diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:25:58 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:25:58 -0700 |
| commit | 0830223112c7639072325554186de337144b763d (patch) | |
| tree | 734191ef5c622fefd49bc8c0774d80e0b13f186c | |
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 5681-0.txt | 2789 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 5681-0.zip | bin | 0 -> 57184 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 5681-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 59384 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 5681-h/5681-h.htm | 3443 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/5681.txt | 2978 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/5681.zip | bin | 0 -> 56598 bytes |
9 files changed, 9226 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/5681-0.txt b/5681-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ca6b344 --- /dev/null +++ b/5681-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2789 @@ +The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Laws of Etiquette, by A Gentleman + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and +most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions +whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms +of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at +www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you +will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before +using this eBook. + +Title: The Laws of Etiquette + +Author: A Gentleman + +Release Date: August 7, 2002 [eBook #5681] +[Most recently updated: September 8, 2021] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + +Produced by: Holly Ingraham + +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAWS OF ETIQUETTE *** + + + + +The Laws of Etiquette + +or, +Short Rules and Reflections + +for +CONDUCT IN SOCIETY. + +by A Gentleman + +PHILADELPHIA: + +1836. + + + + +Transcriber’s Note: Note the inconsistency of “Brummell” in one place +of the original, and “Brummel” all other places. Also “Shakspeare,” +“Don Quixotte,” “Sir Piercy,” and “Esop” are as in the original. + + +Contents + + PREFACE + INTRODUCTION + CHAPTER I. GOOD BREEDING. + CHAPTER II. DRESS. + CHAPTER III. SALUTATIONS. + CHAPTER IV. THE DRAWING-ROOM. COMPANY. CONVERSATION. + CHAPTER V. THE ENTRANCE INTO SOCIETY. + CHAPTER VI. LETTERS. + CHAPTER VII. VISITS. + CHAPTER VIII. APPOINTMENTS AND PUNCTUALITY. + CHAPTER IX. DINNER. + CHAPTER X. TRAVELLING. + CHAPTER XI. BALLS. + CHAPTER XII. FUNERALS. + CHAPTER XIII. SERVANTS. + CHAPTER XIV. FASHION. + CHAPTER XV. MISCELLANEOUS. + + + + +PREFACE + + +The author of the present volume has endeavoured to embody, in as short +a space as possible, some of the results of his own experience and +observation in society, and submits the work to the public, with the +hope that the remarks which are contained in it, may prove available +for the benefit of others. It is, of course, scarcely possible that +anything original should be found in a volume like this: almost all +that it contains must have fallen under the notice of every man of +penetration who has been in the habit of frequenting good society. Many +of the precepts have probably been contained in works of a similar +character which have appeared in England and France since the days of +Lord Chesterfield. Nothing however has been copied from them in the +compilation of this work, the author having in fact scarcely any +acquaintance with books of this description, and many years having +elapsed since he has opened even the pages of the noble oracle. He has +drawn entirely from his own resources, with the exception of some hints +for arrangement, and a few brief reflections, which have been derived +from the French. + +The present volume is almost apart from criticism. It has no +pretensions to be judged as a literary work—its sole merit depending +upon its correctness and fitness of application. Upon these grounds he +ventures to hope for it a favourable reception. + + + + +INTRODUCTION + + +The great error into which nearly all foreigners and most Americans +fall, who write or speak of society in this country, arises from +confounding the political with the social system. In most other +countries, in England, France, and all those nations whose government +is monarchical or aristocratic, these systems are indeed similar. +Society is there intimately connected with the government, and the +distinctions in one are the origin of gradations in the other. The +chief part of the society of the kingdom is assembled in the capital, +and the same persons who legislate for the country legislate also for +it. But in America the two systems are totally unconnected, and +altogether different in character. In remodelling the form of the +administration, society remained unrepublican. There is perfect freedom +of political privilege, all are the same upon the hustings, or at a +political meeting; but this equality does not extend to the +drawing-room or the parlour. None are excluded from the highest +councils of the nation, but it does not follow that all can enter into +the highest ranks, of society. In point of fact, we think that there is +more exclusiveness in the society of this country, than there is in +that even of England—far more than there is in France. And the +explanation may perhaps be found in the fact which we hate mentioned +above. There being _there_ less danger of permanent disarrangement or +confusion of ranks by the occasional admission of the low-born +aspirant, there does not exist the same necessity for a jealous +guarding of the barriers as there does here. The distinction of +classes, also, after the first or second, is actually more clearly +defined, and more rigidly observed in America, than in any country of +Europe. Persons unaccustomed to look searchingly at these matters, may +be surprised to hear it; but we know from observation, that there are +among the respectable, in any city of the United States, at least ten +distinct ranks. We cannot, of course, here point them out, because we +could not do it without mentioning names. + +Every man is naturally desirous of finding entrance into the best +society of his country, and it becomes therefore a matter of importance +to ascertain what qualifications are demanded for admittance. + +A writer who is popularly unpopular, has remarked, that the test of +standing in Boston, is literary eminence; in New York, wealth; and in +Philadelphia, purity of blood. + +To this remark, we can only oppose our opinion, that none of these are +indispensable, and none of them sufficient. The society of this +country, unlike that of England, does not court literary talent. We +have cases in our recollection, which prove the remark, in relation to +the highest ranks, even of Boston. Wealth has no pretensions to be the +standard anywhere. In New York, the Liverpool of America, although the +rich may make greater display and _bruit_, yet all of the merely rich, +will find that there does exist a small and unchanging circle, whether +above or below them, ‘it is not ours to say,’ yet completely apart from +them, into which they would rejoice to find entrance, and from which +they would be glad to receive emigrants. + +Whatever may be the accomplishments necessary to render one capable of +reaching the highest platform of social eminence, and it is not easy to +define clearly what they are, there is one thing, and one alone, which +will enable any man to _retain_ his station there; and that is, GOOD +BREEDING. Without it, we believe that literature, wealth, and even +blood, will be unsuccessful. By it, if it co-exist with a certain +capacity of affording pleasure by conversation, any one, we imagine, +could frequent the very best society in every city of America, and +_perhaps the very best alone._ To obtain, then, the manners of a +gentleman is a matter of no small importance. + +We do not pretend that a man will be metamorphosed into a gentleman by +reading this book, or any other book. Refined manners are like refined +style which Cicero compares to the colour of the cheeks, which is not +acquired by sudden or violent exposure to heat, but by continual +walking in the sun. Good manners can certainly only be acquired by much +usage in good company. But there are a number of little forms, +imperiously enacted by custom, which may be taught in this manner, and +the conscious ignorance of which often prevents persons from going into +company at all. + +These forms may be abundantly absurd, but still they _must_ be attended +to; for one half the world does and always will observe them, and the +other half is at a great disadvantage if it does not. Intercourse is +constantly taking place, and an awkward man of letters, in the society +of a polished man of the world, is like a strong man contending with a +skilful fencer. Mr. Addison says, that he once saw the ablest +mathematician in the kingdom utterly embarrassed, from not knowing +whether he ought to stand or sit when my lord duke drank his health. + +Some of the many errors which are liable to be committed through +ignorance of usage, are pleasantly pointed out in the following story, +which is related by a French writer. + +The Abbé Cosson, professor in the _Collége Mazarin_, thoroughly +accomplished in the art of teaching, saturated with Greek, Latin, and +literature, considered himself a perfect well of science: he had no +conception that a man who knew all Persius and Horace by heart could +possibly commit an error—above all, an error at table. But it was not +long before he discovered his mistake. One day, after dining with the +Abbé de Radonvillers at Versailles, in company with several courtiers +and marshals of France, he was boasting of the rare acquaintance with +etiquette and custom which he had exhibited at dinner. The Abbé +Delille, who heard this eulogy upon his own conduct, interrupted his +harangue, by offering to wager that he had committed at least a hundred +improprieties at the table. “How is it possible!” exclaimed Cosson. “I +did exactly like the rest of the company.” + +“What absurdity!” said the other. “You did a thousand things which no +one else did. First, when you sat down at the table, what did you do +with your napkin?” “My napkin? Why just what every body else did with +theirs. I unfolded it entire]y, and fastened it to my buttonhole.” +“Well, my dear friend,” said Delille, “you were the only one that did +_that_, at all events. No one hangs up his napkin in that style; they +are contented with placing it on their knees. And what did you, do when +you took your soup?” “Like the others, I believe. I took my spoon in +one hand, and my fork in the other—” “Your fork! Who ever eat soup with +a fork?—But to proceed; after your soup, what did you eat?” “A fresh +egg.” “And what did you do with the shell?” “Handed it to the servant +who stood behind my chair.” “With out breaking it?” “Without breaking +it, of course.” “Well, my dear Abbé, nobody ever eats an egg without +breaking the shell. And after your egg—?” “I asked the Abbé +Radonvillers to send me a piece of the hen near him.” “Bless my soul! a +piece of the _hen_? You never speak of hens excepting in the barn-yard. +You should have asked for fowl or chicken. But you say nothing of your +mode of drinking.” “Like all the rest, I asked for _claret_ and +_champagne._” “Let me inform you, then, that persons always ask for +_claret wine_ and _champagne wine._ But, tell me, how did you eat your +bread?” “Surely I did that properly. I cut it with my knife, in the +most regular manner possible.” “Bread should always be broken, not cut. +But the coffee, how did you manage it?” “It was rather too hot, and I +poured a little of it into my saucer.” “Well, you committed here the +greatest fault of all. You should never pour your coffee into the +saucer, but always drink it from the cup.” The poor Abbé was +confounded. He felt that though one might be master of the seven +sciences, yet that there was another species of knowledge which, if +less dignified, was equally important. + +This occurred many years ago, but there is not one of the observances +neglected by the Abbé Cosson, which is not enforced with equal +rigidness in the present day. + + + + +CHAPTER I. +GOOD BREEDING. + + +The formalities of refined society were at first established for the +purpose of facilitating the intercourse of persons of the same +standing, and increasing the happiness of all to whom they apply. They +are now kept up, both to assist the convenience of intercourse and to +prevent too great familiarity. If they are carried too far, and escape +from the control of good sense, they become impediments to enjoyment. +Among the Chinese they serve only the purpose of annoying to an +incalculable degree. “The government,” says De Marcy, in writing of +China, “constantly applies itself to preserve, not only in the court +and among the great, but among the people themselves, a constant habit +of civility and courtesy. The Chinese have an infinity of books upon +such subjects; one of these treatises contains more than three thousand +articles.— Everything is pointed out with the most minute detail; the +manner of saluting, of visiting, of making presents, of writing +letters, of eating, etc.: and these customs have the force of laws—no +one can dispense with them. There is a special tribunal at Peking, of +which it is one of the chief duties, to ensure the observance of these +civil ordinances?” + +One would think that one was here reading an account of the capital of +France. It depends, then, upon the spirit in which these forms are +observed, whether their result shall be beneficial or not. The French +and the Chinese are the most formal of all the nations. Yet the one is +the stiffest and most distant; the other, the easiest and most social. + +“We may define politeness,” says La Bruyère, “though we cannot tell +where to fix it in practice. It observes received usages and customs, +is bound to times and places, and is not the same thing in the two +sexes or in different conditions. Wit alone cannot obtain it: it is +acquired and brought to perfection by emulation. Some dispositions +alone are susceptible of politeness, as others are only capable of +great talents or solid virtues. It is true politeness puts merit +forward, and renders it agreeable, and a man must have eminent +qualifications to support himself without it.” Perhaps even the +greatest merit cannot successfully straggle against unfortunate and +disagreeable manners. Lord Chesterfield says that the Duke of +Marlborough owed his first promotions to the suavity of his manners, +and that without it he could not have risen. + +La Bruyère has elsewhere given this happy definition of politeness, the +other passage being rather a description of it. “Politeness seems to be +a certain care, by the manner of our words and actions, to make others +pleased with us and themselves.” + +We must here stop to point out an error which is often committed both +in practice and opinion, and which consists in confounding together the +gentleman and the man of fashion. No two characters can be more +distinct than these. Good sense and self-respect are the foundations of +the one—notoriety and influence the objects of the other. Men of +fashion are to be seen everywhere: a pure and mere gentleman is the +rarest thing alive. Brummel was a man of fashion; but it would be a +perversion of terms to apply to him “a very expressive word in our +language,—a word, denoting an assemblage of many real virtues and of +many qualities approaching to virtues, and an union of manners at once +pleasing and commanding respect,— the word gentleman.”* The requisites +to compose this last character are natural ease of manner, and an +acquaintance with the “outward habit of encounter”—dignity and +self-possession—a respect for all the decencies of life, and perfect +freedom from all affectation. Dr. Johnson’s bearing during his +interview with the king showed him to be a thorough gentleman, and +demonstrates how rare and elevated that character is. When his majesty +expressed in the language of compliment his high opinion of Johnson’s +merits, the latter bowed in silence. If Chesterfield could have +retained sufficient presence of mind to have done the same on such an +occasion, he would have applauded himself to the end of his days. So +delicate is the nature of those qualities that constitute a gentleman, +that there is but one exhibition of this description of persons in all +the literary and dramatic fictions from Shakespeare downward. Scott has +not attempted it. Bulwer, in “Pelham,” has shot wide of the mark. It +was reserved for the author of two very singular productions, +“Sydenham” and its continuation “Alice Paulet”—works of extraordinary +merits and extraordinary faults—to portray this character completely, +in the person of Mr. Paulet. + +* Charles Butler’s Reminiscences + + + + +CHAPTER II. +DRESS. + + +First impressions are apt to be permanent; it is therefore of +importance that they should be favourable. The dress of an individual +is that circumstance from which you first form your opinion of him. It +is even more prominent than manner, It is indeed the only thing which +is remarked in a casual encounter, or during the first interview. It, +therefore, should be the first care. + +What style is to our thoughts, dress is to our persons. It may supply +the place of more solid qualities, and without it the most solid are +of little avail. Numbers have owed their elevation to their attention +to the toilet. Place, fortune, marriage have all been lost by +neglecting it. A man need not mingle long with the world to find +occasion to exclaim with Sedaine, “Ah! mon habit, que je vous +remercie!” In spite of the proverb, the dress often _does_ make the +monk. + +Your dress should always be consistent with your age and your natural +exterior. That which looks outr, on one man, will be agreeable on +another. As success in this respect depends almost entirely upon +particular circumstances and personal peculiarities, it is impossible +to give general directions of much importance. We can only point out +the field for study and research; it belongs to each one’s own genius +and industry to deduce the results. However ugly you may be, rest +assured that there is some style of habiliment which will make you +passable. + +If, for example, you have a stain upon your cheek which rivals in +brilliancy the best Chateau-Margout; or, are afflicted with a nose +whose lustre dims the ruby, you may employ such hues of dress, that the +eye, instead of being shocked by the strangeness of the defect, will be +charmed by the graceful harmony of the colours. Every one cannot indeed +be an Adonis, but it is his own fault if he is an Esop. + +If you have bad, squinting eyes, which have lost their lashes and are +bordered with red, you should wear spectacles. If the defect be great, +your glasses should be coloured. In such cases emulate the sky rather +than the sea: green spectacles are an abomination, fitted only for +students in divinity,— blue ones are respectable and even _distingué._ + +Almost every defect of face may be concealed by a judicious use and +arrangement of hair. Take care, however, that your hair be not of one +colour and your whiskers of another; and let your wig be large enough +to cover the _whole_ of your red or white hair. + +It is evident, therefore, that though a man may be ugly, there is no +necessity for his being shocking. Would that all men were convinced of +this! I verily believe that if Mr. — in his walking-dress, and Mr. — in +his evening costume were to meet alone, in some solitary place, where +there was nothing to divert their attention from one another, they +would expire of mutual hideousness. + +If you have any defect, so striking and so ridiculous as to procure you +a _nickname_ then indeed there is but one remedy,—renounce society. + +In the morning, before eleven o’clock even if you go out, you should +not be dressed. You would be stamped a _parvenu_ if you were seen in +anything better than a reputable old frock coat. If you remain at home, +and are a bachelor, it is permitted to receive visitors in a morning +gown. In summer, calico; in winter, figured cloth, faced with fur. At +dinner, a coat, of course, is indispensable. + +The effect of a frock coat is to conceal the height. If, therefore, you +are beneath the ordinary statue, or much above it, you should affect +frock coats on all occasions that etiquette permits. + +Before going to a ball or party it is not sufficient that you consult +your mirror twenty times. You must be personally inspected by your +servant or a friend. Through defect of this, I once saw a gentleman +enter a ball-room, attired with scrupulous elegance, but with one of +his suspenders curling in graceful festoons about his feet. His glass +could not show what was behind. + +If you are about to present yourself in a company composed only of men, +you may wear boots. If there be but one lady present, pumps and +silk-stockings are indispensable. + +There is a common proverb which says, that if a man be well dressed as +to head and feet, he may present himself everywhere. The assertion is +as false as Mr. Kemble’s voice. Happy indeed if it were necessary to +perfect only the extremities. The coat, the waistcoat, the gloves, and, +above all, the cravat, must be alike ignorant of blemish. + +Upon the subject of the cravat—(for heaven’s sake and Brummel’s, never +appear in a stock after twelve o’clock)—We cannot at present say +anything. If we were to say anything, we could not be content without +saying all, and to say all would require a folio. A book has been +published upon the subject, entitled “The Cravat considered in its +moral, literary, political, military, and religious attributes.” This +and a clever, though less profound, treatise on “The art of tying the +Cravat,” are as indispensable to a gentleman as an ice at twelve +o’clock. + +When we speak of excellence in dress we do not mean richness of +clothing, nor manifested elaboration. Faultless propriety, perfect +harmony, and a refined simplicity,—these are the charms which fascinate +here. + +It is as great a sin to be finical in dress as to be negligent. + +Upon this subject the ladies are the only infallible oracles. Apart +from the perfection to which they must of necessity arrive, from +devoting their entire existence to such considerations, they seem to be +endued with an inexpressible tact, a sort of sixth sense, which reveals +intuitively the proper distinctions. That your dress is approved by a +man is nothing;—you cannot enjoy the high satisfaction of being +perfectly comme il faut, until your performance has received the seal +of a woman’s approbation. + +If the benefits to be derived from cultivating your exterior do not +appear sufficiently powerful to induce attention, the inconveniences +arising from too great disregard may perhaps prevail. Sir Matthew Hale, +in the earlier part of his life, dressed so badly that he was once +seized by the press-gang. Not long since, as I entered the hall of a +public hotel, I saw a person so villainously habited, that supposing +him to be one of the servants, I desired him to take my luggage +upstairs, and was on the point of offering him a shilling, when I +discovered that I was addressing the Honorable Mr. * * *, one of the +most eminent American statesmen. + + + + +CHAPTER III. +SALUTATIONS. + + +The salutation, says a French writer, is the touchstone of good +breeding. According to circumstances, it should be respectful, cordial, +civil, affectionate or familiar:—an inclination of the head, a gesture +with the hand, the touching or doffing of the hat. + +If you remove your hat you need not at the same time bend the dorsal +vertebræ of your body, unless you wish to be very reverential, as in +saluting a bishop. + +It is a mark of high breeding not to speak to a lady in the street, +until you perceive that she has noticed you by an inclination of the +head. + +Some ladies _courtesy_ in the street, a movement not gracefully +consistent with locomotion. They should always _bow._ + +If an individual of the lowest rank, or without any rank at all, takes +off his hat to you, you should do the same in return. A bow, says La +Fontaine, is a note drawn at sight. If you acknowledge it, you must pay +the full amount. The two best-bred men in England, Charles the Second +and George the Fourth, never failed to take off their hats to the +meanest of their subjects. + +Avoid condescending bows to your friends and equals. If you meet a rich +parvenu, whose consequence you wish to reprove, you may salute him in a +very patronizing manner: or else, in acknowledging his bow, look +somewhat surprised and say, “Mister—eh—eh?” + +If you have remarkably fine teeth, you may smile affectionately upon +the bowee, without speaking. + +In passing ladies of rank, whom you meet in society, bow, but do not +speak. + +If you have anything to say to any one in the street, especially a +lady, however intimate you may be, do not stop the person, but turn +round and walk in company; you can take leave at the end of the street. + +If there is any one of your acquaintance, with whom you have a +difference, do not avoid looking at him, unless from the nature of +things the quarrel is necessarily for life. It is almost always better +to bow with cold civility, though without speaking. + +As a general rule never _cut_ any one in the street. Even political and +steamboat acquaintances should be noticed by the slightest movement in +the world. If they presume to converse with you, or stop you to +introduce their companion, it is then time to use your eye-glass, and +say, “I never knew you.” + +If you address a lady in the open air, you remain uncovered until she +has desired you _twice_ to put on your hat. In general, if you are in +any place where _etiquette_ requires you to remain uncovered or +standing, and a lady, or one much your superior, requests you to be +covered or to sit, you may how off the command. If it is repeated, you +should comply. You thereby pay the person a marked, but delicate, +compliment, by allowing their will to be superior to the general +obligations of etiquette. + +When two Americans, who “have not been introduced,” meet in some public +place, as in a theatre, a stagecoach, or a steamboat, they will sit for +an hour staring in one another’s faces, but without a word of +conversation. This form of unpoliteness has been adopted from the +English, and it is as little worthy of imitation as the form of their +government. Good sense and convenience are the foundations of good +breeding; and it is assuredly vastly more reasonable and more agreeable +to enjoy a passing gratification, when no sequent evil is to be +apprehended, than to be rendered uncomfortable by an ill-founded pride. +It is therefore better to carry on an easy and civil conversation. A +snuff-box, or some polite accommodation rendered, may serve for an +opening. Talk only about generalities,—the play, the roads, the +weather. Avoid speaking of persons or politics, for, if the individual +is of the opposite party to yourself, you will be engaged in a +controversy: if he holds the same opinions, you will be overwhelmed +with a flood of vulgar intelligence, which may soil your mind. Be +reservedly civil while the colloquy lasts, and let the acquaintance +cease with the occasion. + +When you are introduced to a gentleman do not give your hand, but +merely bow with politeness: and if you have requested the introduction, +or know the person by reputation, you may make a speech. I am aware +that high authority might easily be found in this country to sanction +the custom of giving the hand upon a first meeting, but it is +undoubtedly a solecism in manners. The habit has been adopted by us, +with some improvement for the worse, from France. When two Frenchmen +are presented to one another, each _presses_ the other’s hand with +delicate affection. The English, however, never do so: and the +practice, if abstractly correct, is altogether inconsistent with the +caution of manner which is characteristic of their nation and our own. +If we are to follow the French, in shaking hands with one whom we have +never before seen, we should certainly imitate them also in kissing our +_intimate_ male acquaintances. If, however, you ought only to bow to a +new acquaintance, you surely should do more to old ones. If you meet an +intimate friend fifty times in a morning, give your hand every time,—an +observance of propriety, which, though worthy of universal adoption, is +in this country only followed by the purists in politeness. The +requisitions of etiquette, if they should be obeyed at all, should be +obeyed fully. This decent formality prevents acquaintance from being +too distant, while, at the same time, it preserves the “familiar” from +becoming “vulgar.” They may be little things, but + +“These little things are great to little men.” + +Goldsmith. + + + + +CHAPTER IV. +THE DRAWING-ROOM. COMPANY. CONVERSATION. + + +The grand object for which a gentleman exists, is to excel in company. +Conversation is the mean of his distinction,—the drawing-room the scene +of his glory. + +When you enter a drawing-room, where there is a ball or a party, you +salute the lady of the house before speaking to any one else. Even your +most intimate friends are enveloped in an opaque atmosphere until you +have made your bow to your entertainer. We must take occasion here to +obelize a custom which prevails too generally in this country. The +company enter the back door of the back parlour, and the mistress of +the house is seated at the other extremity of the front parlour. It is +therefore necessary to traverse the length of two rooms in order to +reach her. A voyage of this kind is by no means an easy undertaking, +when there are Circes and Calypsos assailing one on every side; and +when one has reached the conclusion, one cannot perhaps distinguish the +object of one’s search at a _coup d’œil._ It would be in every point of +view more appropriate if the lady were to stand directly opposite to +the door of the back parlour. Such is the custom in the best companies +abroad. Upon a single gentleman entering at a late hour, it is not so +obligatory to speak first to the mistress of the ceremonies. He may be +allowed to converge his way up to her. When you leave a room before the +others, go without speaking to any one, and, if possible, unseen. + +Never permit the sanctity of the drawing-room to be violated by a boot. + +Fashionable society is divided into _sets_, in all of which there is +some peculiarity of manner, or some dominant tone of feeling. It is +necessary to study these peculiarities before entering the circle. + +In each of these sets there is generally some _gentleman_, who rules, +and gives it its character, or, rather, who is not ruler, but the first +and most favoured subject, and the prime minister of the ladies’ will. +Him you must endeavour to imitate, taking care not to imitate him so +well as to excel him. To differ in manner or opinion from him is to +render yourself unfit for that circle. To speak disrespectfully of him +is to insult personally every lady who composes it. + +In company, though none are “free,” yet all are “equal.” All therefore +whom you meet, should be treated with equal respect, although interest +may dictate toward each different degrees of attention. It is +disrespectful to the inviter to shun any of her guests. Those whom she +has honoured by asking to her house, you should sanction by admitting +to your acquaintance. + +If you meet any one whom you have never heard of before at the table of +a gentleman, or in the drawing-room of a lady, you may converse with +him with entire propriety. The form of “introduction” is nothing more +than a statement by a mutual friend that two gentlemen are by rank and +manners fit acquaintances for one another. All this may be presumed +from the fact, that both meet at a respectable house. This is the +theory of the matter. Custom, however, requires that you should take +the earliest opportunity afterwards to be regularly presented to such +an one. + +Men of all sorts of occupations meet in society. As they go there to +unbend their minds and escape from the fetters of business, you should +never, in an evening, speak to a man about his professions. Do not talk +of politics with a journalist, of fevers to a physician, of stocks to a +broker,—nor, unless you wish to enrage him to the utmost, of +education to a collegian. The error which is here condemned is often +committed from mere good nature and a desire to be affable. But it +betrays to a gentleman, ignorance of the world—to a philosopher, +ignorance of human nature. The one considers that “Tous les hommes sont +égaux devant la politesse:” the other remembers that though it may be +agreeable to be patronised and assisted, yet it is still more agreeable +to be treated as if you needed no patronage, and were above assistance. + +Sir Joshua Reynolds once received from two noblemen invitations to +visit them on Sunday morning. The first, whom he waited upon, welcomed +him with the most obsequious condescension, treated him with all the +attention in the world, professed that he was so desirous of seeing +him, that he had mentioned Sunday as the time for his visit, supposing +him to be too much engaged during the week, to spare time enough for +the purpose, concluded his compliments by an eulogy on painting, and +smiled him affectionately to the door. Sir Joshua left him, to call +upon the other. That one received him with respectful civility, and +behaved to him as he would have behaved to an equal in the +peerage:—said nothing about Raphael nor Correggio, but conversed with +ease about literature and men. This nobleman was the Earl of +Chesterfield. Sir Joshua felt, that though the one had said that he +respected him, the other had proved that he did, and went away from +this one gratified rather than from the first. Reader, there is wisdom +in this anecdote. Mark, learn, and inwardly digest it: and let this be +the moral which you deduce,—that there is distinction in society, but +that there are no distinctions. + +The great business in company is conversation. It should be studied as +art. Style in conversation is as important, and as capable of +cultivation as style in writing. The manner of saying things is what +gives them their value. + +The most important requisite for succeeding here, is constant and +unfaltering attention. That which Churchill has noted as the greatest +virtue on the stage, is also the most necessary in company,—to be +“always attentive to the business of the scene.” Your understanding +should, like your person, be armed at all points. Never go into society +with your mind _en deshabille._ It is fatal to success to be all absent +or _distrait._ The secret of conversation has been said to consist in +building upon the remark of your companion. Men of the strongest minds, +who have solitary habits and bookish dispositions, rarely excel in +sprightly colloquy, because they seize upon the _thing_ itself,—the +subject abstractly,—instead of attending to the _language_ of other +speakers, and do not cultivate _verbal_ pleasantries and refinements. +He who does otherwise gains a reputation for quickness, and pleases by +showing that he has regarded the observation of others. + +It is an error to suppose that conversation consists in talking. A more +important thing is to listen discreetly. Mirabeau said, that to succeed +in the world, it is necessary to submit to be taught many things which +you understand, by persons who know nothing about them. Flattery is the +smoothest path to success; and the most refined and gratifying +compliment you can pay, is to listen. “The wit of conversation consists +more in finding it in others,” says La Bruyère, “than in showing a +great deal yourself: he who goes from your conversation pleased with +himself and his own wit, is perfectly well pleased with you. Most men +had rather please than admire you, and seek less to be instructed,—nay, +delighted,—than to be approved and applauded. The most delicate +pleasure is to please another.” + +It is certainly proper enough to convince others of your merits. But +the highest idea which you can give a man of your own penetration, is +to be thoroughly impressed with his. + +Patience is a social engine, as well as a Christian virtue. To listen, +to wait, and to be wearied are the certain elements of good fortune. + +If there be any foreigner present at a dinner party, or small evening +party, who does not understand the language which is spoken, good +breeding requires that the conversation should be carried on entirely +in his language. Even among your most intimate friends, never address +any one in a language not understood by all the others. It is as bad as +whispering. + +Never speak to any one in company about a private affair which is not +understood by others, as asking how _that_ matter is coming on, &c. In +so doing you indicate your opinion that the rest are _de trop._ If you +wish to make any such inquiries, always explain to others the business +about which you inquire, if the subject admit of it. + +If upon the entrance of a visitor you continue a conversation begun +before, you should always explain the subject to the new-comer. + +If there is any one in the company whom you do not know, be careful how +you let off any epigrams or pleasant little sarcasms. You might be very +witty upon halters to a man whose father had been hanged. The first +requisite for successful conversation is to know your company well. + +We have spoken above of the necessity of relinquishing the prerogative +of our race, and being contented with recipient silence. There is +another precept of a kindred nature to be observed, namely, not to talk +too well when you do talk. You do not raise yourself much in the +opinion of another, if at the same time that you amuse him, you wound +him in the nicest point,—his self-love. Besides irritating vanity, a +constant flow of wit is excessively fatiguing to the listeners. A witty +man is an agreeable acquaintance, but a tiresome friend. “The wit of +the company, next to the butt of the company,” says Mrs. Montagu, “is +the meanest person in it. The great duty of conversation is to follow +suit, as you do at whist: if the eldest hand plays the deuce of +diamonds, let not his next neighbour dash down the king of hearts, +because his hand is full of honours. I do not love to see a man of wit +win all the tricks in conversation.” + +In addressing any one, always look at him; and if there are several +present, you will please more by directing some portion of your +conversation, as an anecdote or statement, to each one individually in +turn. This was the great secret of Sheridan’s charming manner. His +bon-mots were not numerous. + +Never ask a question under any circumstances. In the first place it is +too proud; in the second place, it may be very inconvenient or very +awkward to give a reply. A lady lately inquired of what branch of +medical practice a certain gentleman was professor. He held the chair +of _midwifery_! + +It is indispensable for conversation to be well acquainted with the +current news and the historical events of the last few years. It is not +convenient to be quite so far behind the rest of the world in such +matters, as the Courier des Etats-Unis. That sapient journal lately +announced the dethronement of Charles X. We may expect soon to hear of +the accession of Louis Philippe. + +In society never quote. If you get entangled in a dispute with some +learned blockhead, you may silence him with a few extemporary +quotations. Select the author for whom he has the greatest admiration, +and give him a passage in the style of that writer, which most +pointedly condemns the opinion he supports. If it does not convince +him, he will be so much stunned with amazement that you can make your +escape, and avoid the unpleasant necessity of knocking him down. + +The ordinary weapons which one employs in social encounter, are, +whether dignified or not, always at least honourable. There are some, +however, who habitually prefer to bribe the judge, rather than +strengthen their cause. The instrument of such is flattery. There are, +indeed, cases in which a man of honour may use the same weapon; as +there are cases in which a poisoned sword may be employed for +self-defence. + +Flattery prevails over all, always, and in all places; it conquers the +conqueror of Danäe: few are beneath it, none above it: the court, the +camp, the church, are the scenes of its victories, and all mankind the +subjects of its triumphs. It will be acknowledged, then, that a man +possesses no very contemptible power who can flatter skillfully. + +The power of flattery may be derived from several sources. It may be, +that the person flattered, finding himself gratified, and conscious +that it is to the flatterer that he is indebted for this gratification, +feels an obligation to him, without inquiring the reason; or it may be, +that imagining ourselves to stand high in the good opinion of the one +that praises us, We comply with what he desires, rather than forfeit +that esteem: or, finally, flattery may be only a marked politeness, and +we submit ourselves to the control of the flatterer rather than be +guilty of the rudeness of opposing him. + +Flattery never should be direct. It should not be stated, but inferred. +It is better acted than uttered. Flattery should seem to be the +unwitting and even unwilling expression of genuine admiration. Some +very weak persons do not require that expressions of praise and esteem +toward them should be sincere. They are pleased with the incense, +although they perceive whence it arises: they are pleased that they are +of importance enough to have their favour courted. But in most eases it +is necessary that the flattery should appear to be the honest offspring +of the feelings. _Such_ flattery _must_ succeed; for, it is founded +upon a principle in our nature which is as deep as life; namely, that +we always love those who we think love us. + +It is sometimes flattery to accept praises. + +Never flatter one person in the presence of another. + +Never commend a lady’s musical skill to another lady who herself plays. + +It has often, however, a good effect to praise one man to his +particular friend, if it be for something to which that friend has +himself no pretensions. + +It is an error to imagine that men are less intoxicated with flattery +than women. The only difference is that esteem must be expressed to +women, but proved to men. + +Flattery is of course efficacious to obtain positive benefits. It is +of, more constant use, however, for purposes of defence. You conquer an +attack of rudeness by courtesy: you avert an attack of accusation by +flattery. Every:one remembers the anecdote of Dr. Johnson and Mr. +Ewing. “Prince,” said Napoleon to Talleyrand, “they tell me that you +sometimes speculate improperly in the funds.” “They do me wrong then,” +said Talleyrand. “But how did you acquire so much money!” “I bought +stock the day before you were proclaimed First Consul,” replied the +ex-bishop, “and I sold it the day after.” + +Compliments are light skirmishes in the war of flattery, for the +purpose of obtaining an occasional object. They are little false coins +that you receive with one hand and pay away with the other. To flatter +requires a profound knowledge of human nature and of the character of +your subject; to compliment skillfully, it is sufficient that you are a +pupil of Spurzheim. + +It is a common practice with men to abstain from grave conversation +with women. And the habit is in general judicious. If the woman is +young, gay and trifling, talk to her only of the latest fashions, the +gossip of the day, etc. But this in other cases is not to be done. Most +women who are a little old, particularly married women — and even some +who are young — wish to obtain a reputation for intellect and an +acquaintance With science. You therefore pay them a real compliment, +and gratify their self-love, by conversing occasionally upon grave +matters, which they do not understand, and do not really relish. You +may interrupt a discussion on the beauty of a dahlia, by observing that +as you know that they take an interest in such things you mention the +discovery of a new method of analyzing curves of double curvature. Men +who talk only of trifles will rarely be popular with women past +twenty-five. + +Talk to a mother about her children. Women are never tired of hearing +of themselves and their children. + +If you go to a house where there are children you should take especial +care to conciliate their good will by a little manly _tete-a-tete_, +otherwise you may get a ball against your skins, or be tumbled from a +three-legged chair. + +To be able to converse with women you must study their vocabulary. You +would make a great mistake in interpreting _never, forever_, as they +are explained in Johnson. + +Do not be for ever telling a woman that she is handsome, witty, etc. +She knows that a vast deal better than you do. + +Do not allow your love for one woman to prevent your paying attention +to others. The object of your love is the only one who ought to +perceive it. + +A little pride, which reminds you what is due to yourself, and a little +good nature, which suggests what is due to others, are the +pre-requisites for the moral constitution of a gentleman. + +Too much vivacity and too much inertness are both fatal to politeness. +By the former we are hurried too far, by the latter we are kept too +much back. + +_Nil admirari_, the precept of stoicism, is the precept for conduct +among gentlemen. All excitement must be studiously avoided. When you +are with ladies the case is different. Among them, wonder, +astonishment, ecstacy, and enthusiasm, are necessary in order to be +believed. + +Never dispute in the presence of other persons. If a man states an +opinion which you cannot adopt, say nothing. If he states a fact which +is of little importance, you may carelessly assent. When you differ let +it be indirectly; rather a want of assent than actual dissent. + +If you wish to inquire about anything, do not do it by asking a +question; but introduce the subject, and give the person an opportunity +of saying as much as he finds it agreeable to impart. Do not even say, +“How is your brother to-day?” but “I hope your brother is quite well.” + +Never ask a lady a question about anything whatever. + +It is a point of courtly etiquette which is observed rigorously by +every one who draws nigh, that a question must never be put to a king. + +Never ask a question about the price of a thing. This horrible error is +often committed by a _nouveau riche._ + +If you have accepted an invitation to a party never fail to keep your +promise. It is cruel to the lady of the house to accept, and then send +an apology at the last moment. Especially do not break your word on +account of bad weather. You may be certain that many others will, and +the inciter will be mortified by the paucity of her guests. A cloak and +a carriage will secure you from all inconvenience, and you will be +conferring a real benefit. + + + + +CHAPTER V. +THE ENTRANCE INTO SOCIETY. + + +Women, particularly women a little on the decline, are those who make +the reputation of a young man. When the lustre of their distinction +begins to fade, a slight feeling of less wonted leisure, perhaps a +little spite, makes them observe attentively those who surround them. +Eager to gain new admirers, they encourage the first steps of a +_debutant_ in the career of society, and exert themselves to fit him to +do honour to their patronage. + +A young man, therefore, in entering the world, cannot be too attentive +to conciliate the goodwill of women. Their approbation and support will +serve him instead of a thousand good qualities. Their judgment +dispenses with fortune, talent, and even intelligence. “Les hommes font +les lois: les femmes font les reputations.” + +The desire of pleasing is, of course, the basis of social connexion. +Persons who enter society with the intention of producing an effect, +and of being distinguished, however clever they may be, are never +agreeable. They are always tiresome, and often ridiculous. Persons, who +enter life with such pretensions, have no opportunity for improving +themselves and profiting by experience. They are not in a proper state +to _observe_: indeed, they look only for the effect which they produce, +and with that they are not often gratified. They thrust themselves into +all conversations, indulge in continual anecdotes, which are varied +only by dull disquisitions, listen to others with impatience and +heedlessness, and are angry that they seem to be attending to +themselves. Such men go through scenes of pleasure, enjoying nothing. +They are equally disagreeable to themselves and others. Young men +should, therefore, content themselves with being natural. Let them +present themselves with a modest assurance: let them observe, hear, and +examine, and before long they will rival their models. + +The conversation of those women who are not the most lavishly supplied +with personal beauty, will be of the most advantage to the young +aspirant. Such persons have cultivated their manners and conversation +more than those who can rely upon their natural endowments. The absence +of pride and pretension has improved their good nature and their +affability. They are not too much occupied in contemplating their own +charms, to be disposed to indulge in gentle criticism on others. One +acquires from them an elegance in one’s manners as well as one’s +expressions. Their kindness pardons every error, and to instruct or +reprove, their acts are so delicate that the lesson which they give, +always without offending, is sure to be profitable, though it may be +often unperceived. + +Women observe all the delicacies of propriety in manners, and all the +shades of impropriety, much better than men; not only because they +attend to them earlier and longer, but because their perceptions are +more refined than those of the other sex, who are habitually employed +about greater things. Women divine, rather than arrive at, proper +conclusions. + +The whims and caprices of women in society should of course be +tolerated by men, who themselves require toleration for greater +inconveniences. But this must not be carried too far. There are certain +limits to empire which, if they themselves forget, should be pointed +out to them with delicacy and politeness. You should be the slave of +women, but not of all their fancies. + +Compliment is the language of intercourse from men to women. But be +careful to avoid elaborate and common-place forms of gallant speech. Do +not strive to make those long eulogies on a woman, which have the +regularity and nice dependency of a proposition in Euclid, and might be +fittingly concluded by Q. E. D. Do not be always undervaluing her rival +in a woman’s presence, nor mistaking a woman’s daughter for her sister. +These antiquated and exploded attempts denote a person who has learned +the world more from books than men. + +The quality which a young man should most affect in intercourse with +gentlemen, is a decent modesty: but he must avoid all bashfulness or +timidity. His flights must not go too far; but, so far as they go, let +them be marked by perfect assurance. + +Among persons who are much your seniors behave with the utmost +respectful deference. As they find themselves sliding out of importance +they may be easily conciliated by a little respect. + +By far the most important thing to be attended to, is ease of manner. +Grace may be added afterwards, or be omitted altogether: it is of much +less moment than is commonly believed. Perfect propriety and entire +ease are sufficient qualifications for standing in society, and +abundant prerequisites for distinction. + +There is the most delicate shade of difference between civility and +intrusiveness, familiarity and common-place, pleasantry and sharpness, +the natural and the rude, gaiety and carelessness; hence the +inconveniences of society, and the errors of its members. To define +well in conduct these distinctions, is the great art of a man of the +world. It is easy to know what to do; the difficulty is to know what to +avoid. + +Long usage—a sort of moral magnetism, a tact acquired by frequent and +long associating with others—alone give those qualities which keep one +always from error, and entitle him to the name of a thorough gentleman. + +A young man upon first entering into society should select those +persons who are most celebrated for the propriety and elegance of their +manners. He should frequent their company and imitate their conduct. +There is a disposition inherent, in all, which has been noticed by +Horace and by Dr. Johnson, to imitate faults, because they are more +readily observed and more easily followed. There are, also, many +foibles of manner and many refinements of affectation, which sit +agreeably upon one man, which if adopted by another would become +unpleasant. There are even some excellences of deportment which would +not suit another whose character is different. For successful imitation +in anything, good sense is indispensable. It is requisite correctly to +appreciate the natural differences between your model and yourself, and +to introduce such modifications in the copy as may be consistent with +it. + +Let not any man imagine, that he shall easily acquire these qualities +which will constitute him a gentleman. It is necessary not only to +exert the highest degree of art, but to attain also that higher +accomplishment of concealing art. The serene and elevated dignity which +mark that character, are the result of untiring and arduous effort. +After the sculpture has attained the shape of propriety, it remains to +smooth off all the marks of the chisel. “A gentleman,” says a +celebrated French author, “is one who has reflected deeply upon all the +obligations which belong to his station, and who has applied himself +ardently to fulfil them with grace.” + +Polite without importunity, gallant without being offensive, attentive +to the comfort of all; employing a well-regulated kindness, witty at +the proper times, discreet, indulgent, generous, he exercises, in his +sphere, a high degree of moral authority; he it is, and he alone, that +one should imitate. + + + + +CHAPTER VI. +LETTERS. + + +Always remember that the terms of compliment at the close of a +letter—“I have the honour to be your very obedient servant,” etc. are +merely forms—“signifying nothing.” Do not therefore avoid them on +account of pride, or a dislike to the person addressed. Do not presume, +as some do, to found expectations of favour or promotion from great men +who profess themselves your obliged servant. + +In writing a letter of business it is extremely vulgar to use satin or +glazed gold-edged paper. Always employ, on such occasions, plain +American paper. Place the date at the top of the page, and if you +please, the name of the person at the top also, just above the ‘Sir;’ +though this last is indifferent. + +In letters to gentlemen always place the date at the end of the letter, +below his name. Use the best paper, but not figured, and never fail to +enclose it in an envelope. Attention to these matters is indispensable. + +To a person whom you do not know well, say Sir, not ‘Dear Sir.’ It +formerly was usual in writing to a distinguished man to employ the form +‘Respected Sir,’ or something of the kind. This is now out of fashion. + +There are a great many forms observed by the French in their letters, +which are necessary to be known before addressing one of that nation. +You will find them in their books upon such subjects, or learn them +from your French master. One custom of theirs is worthy of adoption +among us: to proportion the distance between the ‘Sir’ and the first +line of the letter, to the rank of the person to whom you write. Among +the French to neglect attending to this would give mortal offence. It +obtains also in other European nations. When the Duke of Buckingham was +at the court of Spain, some letters passed between the Spanish minister +Olivez and himself,—the two proudest men on earth. The Spaniard wrote a +letter to the Englishman, and put the ‘Monsieur’ on a line with the +beginning of his letter. The other, in his reply, placed the ‘Monsieur’ +a little below it. + +A note of invitation or reply is always to be enclosed in an envelope. + +Wafers are now entirely exploded. A letter of business is sealed with +red wax, and marked with some common stamp. Letters to gentlemen demand +red wax sealed with your arms. In notes to ladies employ coloured wax, +but not perfumed. + + + + +CHAPTER VII. +VISITS. + + +Of visits there are various sorts; visits of congratulation, visits of +condolence, visits of ceremony, visits of friendship. To each belong +different customs. + +A visit and an insult must be always returned. + +Visits of ceremony should be very short. Go at some time when business +demands the employment of every moment. In visits of friendship adopt a +different course. + +If you call to see an acquaintance at lodgings, and cannot find any one +to announce you, you knock very lightly at the door, and wait some time +before entering. If you are in too great a hurry, you might find the +person drawing off a night-cap. + +Respectable visitors should be received and treated with the utmost +courtesy. But if a tiresome fellow, after wearying all his friends, +becomes weary of himself, and arrives to bestow his tediousness upon +you, pull out your watch with restlessness, talk about your great +occupations and the value of time. Politeness is one thing; to be made +a convenience of is another. + +The style of your conversation should always be in keeping with the +character of the visit. You must not talk about literature in a visit +of condolence, nor about political economy in a visit of ceremony. + +When a lady visits you, upon her retiring, you offer her your arm, and +conduct her to her carriage. If you are visiting at the same time with +another lady, you should take leave at the same time, and hand her into +her carriage. + +After a hall, a dinner, or a concert, you visit during the week. + +Pay the first visit to a friend just returned from a voyage. + +Annual visits are paid to persons with whom you have a cool +acquaintance, They visit you in the autumn, you return a card in the +spring. + +In paying a visit under ordinary circumstances, you leave a single +card. If there be residing in the family, a married daughter, an +unmarried sister, a transient guest, or any person in a distinct +situation from the mistress of the house, you leave two cards, one for +each party. If you are acquainted with only one member of a family, as +the husband, or the wife, and you wish to indicate that your visit is +to both, you leave two cards. Ladies have a fashion of pinching down +one corner of a card to denote that the visit is to only one of two +parties in a house, and two corners, or one side of the card, when the +visit is to both; but this is a transient mode, and of dubious +respectability. + +If, in paying a morning visit, you are not recognized when you enter, +mention your name immediately. If you call to visit one member, and you +find others only in the parlour, introduce yourself to them. Much +awkwardness may occur through defect of attention to this point. + +When a gentleman is about to be married, he sends cards, a day or two +before the event, to all whom he is in the habit of visiting. These +visits are never paid in person, but the cards sent by a servant, at +any hour in the morning; or the gentleman goes in a carriage, and sends +them in. After marriage, some day is appointed and made known to all, +as the day on which he receives company. His friends then all call upon +him. Would that this also were performed by cards! + + + + +CHAPTER VIII. +APPOINTMENTS AND PUNCTUALITY. + + +When you make an appointment, always be exact in observing it. In some +places, and on some occasions, a quarter of an hour’s _grace_ is given. +This depends on custom, and it is always better not to avail yourself +of it. In Philadelphia it is necessary to be punctual to a second, for +there everybody breathes by the State-house clock If you make an +appointment to meet anywhere, your body must be in a right line with +the frame of the door at the instant the first stroke of the great +clock sounds. If you are a moment later, your character is gone. It is +useless to plead the evidence of your watch, or detention by a friend. +You read your condemnation in the action of the old fellows who, with +polite regard to your feelings, simultaneously pull out their vast +chronometers, as you enter. The tardy man is worse off than the +murderer. _He_ may be pardoned by one person, (the Governor); the +unpunctual is pardoned by none. _Haud inexpectus loquor._ + +If you make an appointment with another at your own house, you should +be invisible to the rest of the world, and consecrate your time solely +to him. + +If you make an appointment with a lady, especially if it be upon a +promenade, or other public place, you must be there a little before the +time. + +If you accept an appointment at the house of a public officer, or a man +of business, be very punctual, transact the affair with despatch, and +retire the moment it is finished. + + + + +CHAPTER IX. +DINNER. + + +The hour of dinner has been said, by Dr. Johnson, to be the most +important hour in civilized life. The etiquette of the dinner-table has +a prominence commensurate with the dignity of the ceremony. Like the +historian of Peter Bell, we commence at the commencement, and thence +proceed to the moment when you take leave officially, or vanish unseen. + +In order to dine, the first requisite is—to be invited. The length of +time which the invitation precedes the dinner is always proportioned to +the grandeur of the occasion, and varies from two days to two weeks. To +an invitation received less than two days in advance, you will lose +little by replying in the negative, for as it was probably sent as soon +as the preparations of the host commenced, you may be sure that there +will be little on the table fit to eat. Those abominations, y’clept +“plain family dinners,” eschew like the plague. + +You reply to a note of invitation immediately, and in the most direct +and unequivocal terms. If you accept, you arrive at the house +rigorously at the hour specified. It is equally inconvenient to be too +late and to be too early. If you fall into the latter error, you find +every thing in disorder; the master of the house is in his +dressing-room, changing his waistcoat; the lady is still in the pantry; +the fire not yet lighted in the parlour. If by accident or +thoughtlessness you arrive too soon, you may pretend that you called to +inquire the exact hour at which they dine, having mislaid the note, and +then retire to walk for an appetite. If you are too late, the evil is +still greater, and indeed almost without a remedy. Your delay spoils +the dinner and destroys the appetite and temper of the guests; and you +yourself are so much embarrassed at the inconvenience you have +occasioned, that you commit a thousand errors at table. If you do not +reach the house until dinner is served, you had better retire to a +restaurateurs, and thence send an apology, and not interrupt the +harmony of the courses by awkward excuses and cold acceptances. + +When the guests have all entered, and been presented to one another, if +any delay occurs, the conversation should be of the lightest and least +exciting kind; mere common-places about the weather and late arrivals. +You should not amuse the company by animated relations of one person +who has just cut his throat from ear to ear, or of another who, the +evening before, was choked by a tough beef-steak and was buried that +morning. + +When dinner is announced, the inviter rises and requests all to walk to +the dining-room. He then leads the way, that they may not be at a loss +to know whither they should proceed. Each gentleman offers his arm to a +lady, and they follow in solemn order. + +The great distinction now becomes evident between the host and the +guests, which distinction it is the chief effort of good breeding to +remove. To perform faultlessly the honours of the table, is one of the +most difficult things in society: it might indeed be asserted without +much fear of contradiction, that no man has as yet ever reached exact +propriety in his office as host, has hit the mean between exerting +himself too much and too little. His great business is to put every one +entirely at his ease, to gratify all his desires, and make him, in a +word, absolutely contented with men and things. To accomplish this, he +must have the genius of tact to perceive, and the genius of finesse to +execute; ease and frankness of manner; a knowledge of the world that +nothing can surprise; a calmness of temper that nothing can disturb, +and a kindness of disposition that can never be exhausted. When he +receives others, he must be content to forget himself; he must +relinquish all desire to shine, and even all attempts to please his +guests by conversation, and rather, do all in his power to let them +please one another. He behaves to them without agitation, without +affectation; he pays attention without an air of protection; he +encourages the timid, draws out the silent, and directs conversation +without Sustaining it himself. He who does not do all this, is wanting +in his duty as host; he who does, is more than mortal. + +When all are seated, the gentleman at the head of the table sends soup +to every one, from the pile of plates which stand at his right hand. He +helps the person at his right hand first, and at his left next, and so +through the whole. + +There are an immensity of petty usages at the dinner table, such as +those mentioned in the story of the Abbé Delille and the Abbé Cosson in +the Introduction to this volume, which it would be trifling and tedious +to enumerate hers, and which will be learned by an observing man after +assisting at two or three dinners. + +You should never ask a gentleman or lady at the table to help you to +any thing, but always apply to the servants. + +Your first duty at the table is to attend to the wants of the lady who +sits next to you, the second, to attend to your own. In performing the +first, you should take care that the lady has all that she wishes, yet +without appearing to direct your attention too much to her plate, for +nothing is more ill-bred than to watch a person eating. If the lady be +something of a _gourmande_, and in ever-zealous pursuit of the aroma of +the wing of a pigeon, should raise an unmanageable portion to her +mouth, you should cease all conversation with her, and look steadfastly +into the opposite part of the room. + +In France, a dish, after having been placed upon the table for +approval, is removed by the servants, and carved at a sideboard, and +after. wards handed to each in succession. This is extremely +convenient, and worthy of acceptation in this country. But +unfortunately it does not as yet prevail here. Carving therefore +becomes an indispensable branch of a gentleman’s education. You should +no more think of going to a dinner without a knowledge of this art, +than you should think of going without your shoes. The gentleman of the +house selects the various dishes in the order in which they should be +cut, and invites some particular one to perform the office. It is +excessively awkward to be obliged to decline, yet it is a thing too +often occurring in,his country. When you carve, you should never rise +from your seat. + +Some persons, in helping their guests, or recommending dishes to their +taste, preface every such action with an eulogy on its merits, and draw +every bottle of wine with an account of its virtues. Others, running +into the contrary extreme, regret or fear that each dish is not exactly +as it should be; that the cook, etc., etc. Both of these habits are +grievous errors. You should leave it to your guests alone to approve, +or suffer one of your intimate friends who is present, to vaunt your +wine. When you draw a bottle, merely state its age and brand, and of +what particular vintage it is. + +Do not insist upon your guests partaking of particular dishes, never +ask persons more than once, and never put anything by force upon their +plates. It is extremely ill-bred, though extremely common, to press +one to eat of anything. You should do all that you can to make your +guests feel themselves at home, which they never can do while you are +so constantly forcing upon their minds the recollection of the +difference between yourself and them. You should never send away your +own plate until all your guests have finished. + +Before the cloth is removed you do not drink wine unless with another. +If you are asked to take wine it is uncivil to refuse. When you drink +with another, you catch the person’s eye and bow with politeness. It is +not necessary to say anything, but smile with an air of great kindness. + +Some one who sits near the lady of the house, should, immediately upon +the removal of the soup, request the honor of drinking wine with her, +which movement is the signal for all the others. If this is not done, +the master of the house should select some lady. _He_ never asks +gentlemen, but they ask him; this is a refined custom, attended to in +the best company. + +If you have drunk with every one at the table, and wish more wine, you +must wait till the cloth is removed. The decanter is then sent round +from the head of the table, each person fills his glass, and all the +company drinks the Health of all the company. It is enough if you bow +to the master and mistress of the house, and to your opposite +neighbour. After this the ladies retire. Some one rises to open the +door for them, and they go into the parlour, the gentlemen remaining to +drink more wine. + +After the ladies have retired, the service of the decanters is done. +The host draws the bottles which have been standing in a wine cooler +since the commencement of the dinner. The bottle goes down the left +side and up the right, and the same bottle never passes twice. If you +do not drink, always pass the bottle to your neighbour. + +At dinner never call for ale or porter; it is coarse, and injures the +taste for wine. + +It was formerly the custom to drink _porter_ with cheese. One of the +few real improvements introduced by the “Napoleon of the realms of +fashion” was to banish this tavern liquor and substitute _port._ The +dictum of Brummell was thus enunciated: “A gentleman never _malts_, he +_ports._” + +A gentleman should always express his preference for some one sort of +wine over others; because, as there is always a natural preference for +one kind, if you say that you are indifferent, you show that you are +not accustomed to drink wines. Your preference should not of course be +guided by your real disposition; if you are afflicted by nature with a +partiality for port, you should never think of indulging it except in +your closet with your chamber-door locked. The only index of choice is +fashion;—either permanent fashion (if the phrase may be used), or some +temporary fashion created by the custom of any individual who happens +to rule for a season in society. Port was drunk by our ancestors, but +George the Fourth, upon his accession to the regency, announced his +royal preference for sherry. It has since been fashionable to like +sherry. This is what we call a _permanent_ fashion. + +Champagne wine is drunk after the removal of the first cloth; that is +to say, between the meats and the dessert. One servant goes round and +places before each guest a proper-shaped glass; another follows and +fills them, and they are immediately drunk. Sometimes this is done +twice in succession. The bottle does not again make its appearance, and +it would excite a stare to ask at a later period for a glass of +champagne wine. + +If you should happen to be blessed with those rely nuisances, children, +and should be entertaining company, never allow them to be brought in +after dinner, unless they are particularly asked for, and even then it +is better to say they are at school. Some persons, with the intention +of paying their court to the father, express great desire to see the +sons; but they should have some mercy upon the rest of the party, +particularly as they know that they themselves would be the most +disturbed of all, if their urgent entreaty was granted. + +Never at any time, whether at a formal or a familiar dinner party, +commit the impropriety of talking to a servant: nor ever address any +remark about one of them to one of the party. Nothing can be more +ill-bred. You merely ask for what you want in a grave and civil tone, +and wait with patience till your order is obeyed. + +It is a piece of refined coarseness to employ the fingers instead of +the fork to effect certain operations at the dinner table, and on some +other similar occasions. To know how and when to follow the fashion of +Eden, and when that of more civilized life, is one of the many points +which distinguish a gentleman from one not a gentleman; or rather, in +this case, which shows the difference between a man of the world, and +one who has not “the tune of the time.”* Cardinal Richelieu detected an +adventurer who passed himself off for a nobleman, by his helping +himself to olives with a fork. He might have applied the test to a vast +many other things. Yet, on the other hand, a gentleman would lose his +reputation, if he were to take up a piece of sugar with his fingers and +not with the sugar-tongs. + +* Shakspeare + + +It is of course needless to say that your own knife should never be +brought near to the butter, or salt, or to a dish of any kind. If, +however, a gentleman should send his plate for anything near you, and a +knife cannot be obtained immediately, you may skillfully avoid all +censure by using _his_ knife to procure it. + +When you send your plate for anything, you leave your knife and fork +upon it, crossed. When you have done, you lay both in parallel lines on +one side. A render who occupies himself about greater matters, may +smile at this precept. It may, indeed, be very absurd, yet such is the +tyranny of custom, that if you were to cross your knife and fork when +you have finished, the most reasonable and strong-minded man at the +table could not help setting you down, in his own mind, as a low-bred +person. _Magis sequor quam probo._ + +The chief matter of consideration at the dinner table, as indeed +everywhere else in the life of a gentleman, is to be perfectly composed +and at his ease. He speaks deliberately, he performs the most important +act of the day as if he were performing the most ordinary. Yet there is +no appearance of trifling or want of gravity in his manner; he +maintains the dignity which is becoming on so vital an occasion. He +performs all the ceremonies, yet in the style of one who performs no +_ceremony_ at all. He goes through all the complicated duties of the +scene, as if he were “to the manner born.” + +Some persons, who cannot draw the nice distinction between too much and +too little, desiring to be particularly respectable, make a point of +appearing unconcerned and quite indifferent to enjoyment at dinner. +Such conduct not only exhibits a want of sense and a profane levity, +but is in the highest degree rude to your obliging host. He has taken a +great deal of trouble to give you pleasure, and it is your business to +be, or at least to appear, pleased. It is one thing, indeed, to stare +and wonder, and to ask for all the delicacies on the table in the style +of a person who had lived all his life behind a counter, but it is +quite another to throw into your manner the spirit and gratified air of +a man who is indeed not unused to such matters, but who yet esteems +them at their fall value. + +When the Duke of Wellington was at Paris, as commander of the allied +armies, he was invited to dine with Cambaceres, one of the most +distinguished statesmen and _gourmands_ of the time of Napoleon. In the +course of the dinner, his host having helped him to some particularly +_recherché_ dish, expressed a hope that he found it agreeable. “Very +good,” said the hero of Waterloo, who was probably speculating upon +what he would have done if Blucher had not come up: “Very good; but I +really do not care what I eat.” “Good God!” exclaimed Cambaceres,—as he +started back and dropped his fork, quite “frighted from his +propriety,”—“Don’t care what you eat! What _did_ you come here for, +then?” + +After the wine is finished, you retire to the drawing-room, where the +ladies are assembled; the master of the house rising first from the +table, but going out of the room last. If you wish to go before this, +you must vanish unseen. + +We conclude this chapter by a word of important counsel to the +host:—Never make an apology. + + + + +CHAPTER X. +TRAVELLING. + + +It is an extremely difficult affair to travel in a coach, with perfect +propriety. Ten to one the person next to you is an English nobleman +_incognito_; and a hundred to one, the man opposite to you is a brute +or a knave. To behave so that you may not be uncivil to the one, nor a +dupe to the other, is an art of some niceness. + +As the seats are assigned to passengers in the order in which they are +booked, you should send to have your place taken a day or two before +the journey, so that you may be certain of a back seat. It is also +advisable to arrive at the place of departure early, so that you assume +your place without dispute. + +When women appear at the door of the coach to obtain admittance, it is +a matter of some question to know exactly what conduct it is necessary +to pursue. If the women are servants, or persons in a low rank of life, +I do not see upon what ground of politeness or decency you are called +upon to yield your seat. _Etiquette_, and the deference due to ladies +have, of course, no operation in the case of such persons. +Chivalry—(and the gentleman is the legitimate descendant of the knight +of old)—was ever a devotion to rank rather than to sex. Don Quixotte, +or Sir Piercy Shafestone would not willingly have given place to +servant girls. And upon considerations of humanity and regard to +weakness, the case is no stronger. Such people have nerves considerably +more robust than you have, and are quite as capable of riding +backwards, or the top, as yourself. The only reason for _politeness_ in +the case is, that perhaps the other passengers are of the same standing +with the women, and might eject you from the window if you refuse to +give place. + +If _ladies_ enter—and a gentleman distinguishes them in an instant—the +case is altered. The sooner you move the better is it for yourself, +since the rest will in the end have to concede, and you will give +yourself a reputation among the party and secure a better seat, by +rising at once. + +The principle that guides you in society is politeness; that which +guides you in a coach is good humour. You lay aside all attention to +form, and all strife after effect, and take instead, kindness of +disposition and a willingness to please. You pay a constant regard to +the comfort of your. fellow-prisoners. You take care not to lean upon +the shoulder of your neighbour when you sleep. You are attentive not to +make the stage wait for you at the stopping-places. When the ladies get +out, you offer them your arm, and you do the same when the coachman is +driving rapidly over a rough place. You should make all the +accommodations to others, which you can do consistently with your own +convenience; for, after all, the individuals are each like little +nations; and as, in the one case, the first duty is to your country, so +in the other, the first duty is to yourself. + +Some surly creatures, upon entering a coach, wrap about their persons a +great coat of cloth, and about their minds a mantle of silence, which +are not thrown off during the whole journey. This is doing more harm to +themselves than to others. You should make a point of conversing with +an appearance of entire freedom, though with real reserve, with all +those who are so disposed. + +One purpose and pleasure of travelling is to gain information, and to +observe the various characters of persons. You will be asked by others +about the road you passed over, and it will be awkward if you can give +no account of it. Converse, therefore, with all. Relate amusing +stories, chiefly of other countries, and even of other times, so as not +to offend any one. If engaged in discussion—and a coach is almost the +only place where discussion should _not_ be avoided—state facts and +arguments rather than opinions. Never answer impudent questions-and +never ask them. + +At the meals which occur during a journey, you see beautiful +exemplification of the _dictum_ of Hobbes, “that war is the natural +state of man.” The entire scene is one of unintermitted war of every +person with every other person, with the viands, and with good manners. +You open your mouth only to admit edibles and to bellow to the waiters. +Your sole object is yourself. You drink wine without asking your +neighbour to join you; and if he should be so silly as to ask you to +hand him some specified dish, you blandly comply; but in the passage to +him, you transfer the whole of its contents to your own plate. There is +no halving in these matters. Rapacity, roaring, and rapidity are the +three requisites for dining during a journey. When you have resumed +your seat in the coach, you are as bland as a morning in spring. + +Never assume any unreal importance in a stage-coach, founded on the +ignorance of your fellows, and their inability to detect it. It is +excessively absurd, and can only gratify a momentary and foolish +vanity; for, whenever you might make use of your importance, you would +probably be at once discovered. There is an admirable paper upon this +point in one of Johnson’s Adventurers. + +The friendship which has subsisted between travellers terminates with +the journey. When you get out, a word, a bow, and the most unpleasant +act of life is finished and forgotten. + + + + +CHAPTER XI. +BALLS. + + +Invitations to a ball should be issued at least ten days in advance, in +order to give an opportunity to the men to clear away engagements; and +to women, time to prepare the artillery of their toilet. Cards of +invitation should be sent—not notes. + +Upon the entrance of ladies, or persons entitled to deference, the +master of the house precedes them across the room: he addresses +compliments to them, and will lose his life to procure them seats. + +While dancing with a lady whom you have never seen before, you should +not talk to her much. + +The master of the ceremonies must take care that every lady dances, and +press into service for that purpose these young gentlemen who are +hanging round the room like fossils. If desired by him to dance with a +particular lady you should refuse on no account. + +If you have no ear, that is, a false one, never dance. + +To usurp the seat of a person who is dancing is the height of +incivility. + +Never go to a public ball. + + + + +CHAPTER XII. +FUNERALS. + + +When any member of a family is dead, it is customary to send +intelligence of the misfortune to all who have been connected with the +deceased in relations of business or friendship. The letters which are +sent contain a special invitation to assist at the funeral. + +An invitation of this sort should never be refused, though, of course, +you do not send a reply, for no other reason that I know of, excepting +the impossibility of framing any formula of acceptance. + +You render yourself at the house an hour or two after the time +specified. If you were to sit long in the mournful circle you might be +rendered unfit for doing any thing for a week. + +Your dress is black, and during the time of waiting you compose your +visage into a “tristful ’haviour,” and lean in silent solemnity upon +the top of your cane, thinking about— last night’s party. This is a +necessary hypocrisy, and assists marvellously the sadness of the +ceremony. You walk in a procession with the others, your carriage +following in the street. The first places are yielded to the relations +of the deceased. + +The coffins of persons of distinction are carried in the hands of +bearers, who walk with their hats off. + +You walk with another, in seemly order, and converse in a low tone; +first upon the property of the defunct, and next upon the politics of +the day. You walk with the others into the church, where service is +said over the body. It is optional to go to the grave or not. When you +go away, you enter your carriage and return to your business or your +pleasures. + +A funeral in the morning, a ball in the evening,—“so runs the world +away.” + + + + +CHAPTER XIII. +SERVANTS. + + +Servants are a necessary evil. He who shall contrive to obviate their +necessity, or remove their inconveniences, will render to human comfort +a greater benefit than has yet been conferred by all the +useful-knowledge societies of the age. They are domestic spies, who +continually embarrass the intercourse of the members of a family, or +possess themselves of private information that renders their presence +hateful, and their absence dangerous. It is a rare thing to see persons +who are not controlled by their servants. Theirs, too, is not the only +kitchen cabinet which begins by serving and ends by ruling. + +If we judge from the frequency and inconvenience of an opposite course, +we should say that the most important precept to be observed is, never +to be afraid of your servants. We have known many ladies who, without +any reason in the world, lived in a state of perfect subjugation to +their servants, who were afraid to give a direction, and who submitted +to disobedience and insult, where no danger could be apprehended from +discharging them. + +If a servant offends you by any trifling or occasional omission of +duty, reprove the fault with mild severity; if the error be repeated +often, and be of a gross description, never hesitate, but discharge the +servant instantly, without any altercation of language. You cannot +easily find another who will serve you worse. + +As for those precautions which are ordinarily taken, to secure the +procurence of good servants, they are, without exception, utterly +useless. The author of the Rambler has remarked, that a written +_character_ of a servant is worth about as much as a discharge from the +Old Bailey. I never, but once, took any trouble to inquire what +reputation a servant had held in former situations. On that occasion, I +heard that I had engaged the very Shakespeare of menials,— Aristides +was not more honest,—Zeno more truth-telling,—nor Abdiel more faithful. +This fellow, after insulting me daily for a week, disappeared with my +watch and three pair of boots. + +Those offices which profess to recommend good domestics, are +“bosh,—nothing.” In nine cases out of ten, the keepers are in league +with the servants; and in the tenth, ignorance, dishonesty, or +carelessness will prevent any benefit resulting from,their +“intelligence.” All that you can do is, to take the most decent +creature who applies; trust in Providence, and lock every thing up. + +Never speak harshly, or superciliously, or hastily to a servant. There +are many little actions which distinguish, to the eye of the most +careless observer, a gentleman from one not a gentleman; but there is +none more striking than the manner of addressing a servant. Issue your +commands with gravity and gentleness, and in a reserved manner. Let +your voice be composed, but avoid a tone of familiarity or sympathy +with them. It is better in addressing them to use a higher key of +voice, and not to suffer it to fall at the end of a sentence. The best +bred man whom we ever had the pleasure of meeting, always employed, in +addressing servants, such forms of speech as these—“I’ll thank you for +so and so,”—“Such a thing, if you please,”—with a gentle tone, but +very elevated key. The perfection of manner, in this particular, is, to +indicate by your language, that the performance is a favour, and by +your tone that it is a matter of course. + +While, however, you practise the utmost mildness and forbearance in +your language, avoid the dangerous and common error of exercising too +great humanity in action. No servant, from the time of the first +Gibeonite downwards, has ever had too much labour imposed upon him; +while thousands have been ruined by the mistaken kindness of their +masters. + +Servants should always be allowed, and indeed directed, to go to church +on Sunday afternoon. For this purpose, dinner is served earlier on that +day than usual. If it can be accomplished, the servants should be +induced to attend the same church as the family with whom they live; +because there may be reason to fear that if they profess to go +elsewhere, they may not go to church at all; and the habit of wandering +about the streets with idlers, will speedily ruin the best servant that +ever stood behind a chair. + +Servants should be directed to announce visitors. This is always done +abroad, and is a convenient custom. + +Never allow a female servant to enter a parlour. If all the male +domestics are gone out, it is better that there should be no attendance +at all. + +Some ladies are in the habit of amusing their friends with accounts of +the difficulty of getting good servants, etc. This denotes decided ill +breeding. Such subjects should never be made topics of conversation. + +If a servant offends you by any grossness of conduct, never rebuke the +offence upon the spot, nor indeed notice it at all at the time; for you +cannot do it without anger, and without giving rise to a _scene._ +Prince Puckler Muskaw was, very properly, turned out of the Travellers’ +Club for throwing a fork at one of the waiters. + +In the house of another, or when there is any company present in your +own, never converse with the servants. This most vulgar, but not +uncommon, habit, is judiciously censured in that best of novels,—the +Zeluco of Dr. Moore. + + + + +CHAPTER XIV. +FASHION. + + +Fashion is a tyranny founded only on assumption. The principle upon +which its influence rests, is one deeply based in the human heart, and +one which has long been observed and long practised upon in every +department of life. In the literary, the religious, and the political +world, it has been an assured and very profitable conclusion, that the +public, + +“Like women, born to be controlled, +Stoops to the forward and the bold.” + + +“Qui sibi fidit, dux regit examen,” is a maxim of universal truth. +Pococurante, in Candide, was admired for despising Homer and Michel +Angelo; he would have gained little distinction by praising them. The +judicious application of this rule to society, is the origin of +fashion. In despair of attaining greatness of quality, it founds its +distinction only on peculiarity. + +We have spoken elsewhere of those complex and very rare +accomplishments, whose union is requisite to constitute a gentleman. We +know of but one quality which is demanded for a man of +fashion,—impudence. An impudence (self-confidence “the wise it call”) +as impenetrable as the gates of Pandemonium—a coolness and +imperturbability of self-admiration, which the boaster in Spencer +might envy—a contempt of every decency, as such, and an utter +imperviousness to ridicule,—these are the amiable and dignified +qualities which serve to rear an empire over the weakness and cowardice +of men. + +To define the character of that which is changing even while we survey +it, is a task of no small difficulty. We imagine that there is only one +means by which it may be always described, viz., that it consists in an +entire avoidance of all that is natural and rational. Its essence is +affectation; effeminacy takes the place of manliness; drawling +stupidity, of wit; stiffness and hauteur, of ease and civility; and +self-illustration, of a decent and respectful regard to others. + +A man of fashion must never allow himself to be pleased. Nothing is +more decidedly _de mauvais ton_ than any expression of delight. He must +never laugh, nor, unless his penetration is very great, must he even +smile; for he might by ignorance smile at the wrong place or time. All +real emotion is to be avoided; all sympathy with the great or the +beautiful is to be shunned; yet the liveliest feeling may be exhibited +upon the death of a poodle-dog. + +At the house of an acquaintance, he must never praise, nor even look, +at the pictures, the carpets, the curtains, or the ottomans, because if +he did, it might be supposed that he was not accustomed to such things. + +About two years ago, it began to be considered improper to pay +compliments to women, because if they are not paid gracefully they are +awkward, and to pay them gracefully is difficult. At the present time +it is considered dangerous to a man’s pretensions to fashion, in +England, to speak to women at all. Women are voted bores, and are to be +treated with refined rudeness. + +There is no possible system of manners that will serve to exhibit at +once the uncivility and the high refinement which should characterize +the man of fashion. He must therefore have no manners at all. He must +behave with tame and passive insolence, never breaking into active +effrontery excepting towards unprotected women and clergymen. Persons +of no importance he does not see, and is not conscious of their +existence; those who have the same standing, he treats with easy scorn, +and he acknowledges the distinction of superiors only by patronizing +and protecting them. A man of fashion does not despise wealth; he +cannot but think _that_ valuable which procures to others the honour of +paying for his suppers. + +Fashion is so completely distinguished from good breeding, that it is +even opposed to it. It is in fact a system of refined vulgarity. What, +for example can be more vulgar than incessantly _talking_ about forms +and customs? About silver forks and French soup? A gentleman follows +these conventional habits; but he follows them as matters of course. He +looks upon them as the ordinary and essential customs of refined +society. French forks are to him things as indispensable as a +table-cloth; and he thinks it as unnecessary to insist upon the one as +upon the other. If he sees a person who eats with his knife, he +concludes that that person is ignorant of the usages of the world, but +he does not shriek and faint away like a Bond-street dandy. If he dines +at a table where there are no silver forks, he eats his dinner in +perfect propriety with steel, and exhibits, neither by manner nor by +speech, that he perceives any error. To be sure, he forms his own +opinion about the rank of his entertainer, but he leaves it to such +new-made gentry as Mr. Theodore Hook, in his vulgar fashionable novels, +to harangue about such delinquencies. The vulgarity of insisting upon +these matters is scarcely less offensive than the vulgarity of +neglecting them. Lady Frances Pelham is but one remove better than a +Brancton. + +A man of fashion never goes to the theatre; he is waiting for the +opera. + +He, of course, goes out of town in the summer; or, if he cannot afford +to do so, he merely closes his window-shutters, and appears to be gone. + +Fashion makes all great things little, and all little things great. + +It is commonly said, that it requires more wit to perform the part of +the fool in a farce than that of the master. Without intending any +offence to the fool by the comparison, we may remark, that qualities of +an elevated character are required for the support of the _role_ of a +man of fashion in the solemn farce of life. He must have invention, to +vary his absurdities when they cease to be striking; he must have wit +enough to obtain the reputation of a great deal more; and he must +possess tact to know when and where to crouch, and where and when to +insult. + +Brummel, whose career is one of the most extraordinary on record, must +have exercised, during the period of his social reign, many qualities +of conduct which rank among the highest endowments of our race. For an +obscure individual, without fortune or rank, to have conceived the idea +of placing himself at the head of society in a country the most +thoroughly aristocratic in Europe, relying too upon no other weapon +than well-directed insolence; for the same individual to have triumphed +splendidly over the highest and the mightiest—to have maintained a +contest with royalty itself, and to have come off victorious even in +that struggle—for such an one no ordinary faculties must have been +demanded. Of the sayings of Brummel which have been preserved, it is +difficult to distinguish whether they contain real wit, or are only so +sublimely and so absurdly impudent that they look like witty. + +We add here a few anecdotes of Brummel, which will serve to show, +better than any precepts, the style of conduct which a man of fashion +may pursue. + +When Brummel was at the height of his power, he was once, in the +company of some gentlemen, speaking of the Prince of Wales as a very +good sort of man, who behaved himself very decently, _considering +circumstances_; some one present offered a wager that he would not dare +to give a direction to this very good sort of man. Brummel looked +astonished at the remark, and declined accepting a wager upon such +point. They happened to be dining with the regent the next day, and +after being pretty well fortified. with wine, Brummel interrupted a +remark of the prince’s, by exclaiming very mildly and naturally, +“Wales, ring the bell!” His royal highness immediately obeyed the +command, and when the servant entered, said to him, with the utmost +coolness and firmness, “Show Mr. Brummel to his carriage.” The dandy +was not in the least dejected by his expulsion; but meeting the prince +regent, walking with a gentleman, the next day in the street, he did +not bow to him, but stopping the other, drew him aside and said, in a +loud whisper, “Who is that FAT FRIEND of ours?” It must be remembered +that the object of this sarcasm was at that time exceedingly annoyed by +his increasing corpulency; so manifestly so, that Sheridan remarked, +that “though the regent professed himself a Whig, he believed that in +his heart he was no friend to _new measures._” + +Shortly after this occurrence at Carlton-House, Brummel remarked to one +of his friends, that “he had half a mind to cut the young one, and +bring old George into fashion.” + +In describing a short visit which he had paid to a nobleman in the +country, he said, that he had only carried with him a night-cap and a +silver basin to spit in, “Because, you know, it is utterly impossible +to spit in clay.” + +Brummel was once present at a party to which he had not been invited. +After he had been some time in the room, the gentleman of the house, +willing to mortify him, went up to him and said that he believed that +there must be some mistake, as he did not recollect having had the +honour of sending him an invitation. “What is the name?” said the other +very drawlingly, at the same time affecting to feel in his waistcoat +pocket for a card. “Johnson,” replied the gentleman. “Jauhnson?” said +Brummel, “oh! I remember now that the name was Thaunson (Thompson); and +Jauhnson and Thaunson, Thaunson and Jauhnson, you know, are so much the +same kind of thing.” + +Brummel was once asked how much a year he thought would be required to +keep a single man in clothes. “Why, with tolerable economy,” said he, +“I think it might be done for £800.” + +He once went down to a gentleman’s house in the country, without having +been asked to do so. He was given to understand, the next morning, that +his absence would be more agreeable, and he took his departure. Some +one having heard of his discomfiture, asked him how he liked the +accommodations there. He replied coolly, that “it was a very decent +house to spend a single night in.” + +We have mentioned that this dreaded arbiter of modes had threatened +that he would put the prince regent out of fashion. Alas! for the peace +of the British monarch, this was not an idle boast. His dangerous rival +resolved in the unfathomable recesses of a mind capacious of such +things, to commence and to carry on a war whose terror and grandeur +should astound society, to administer to audacious royalty a lesson +which should never be forgotten, and finally to retire, when retire he +must, with mementos of his tremendous power around him, and with the +mightiest of the earth at his feet. Inventive and deliberate were the +counsels which he meditated; sublime and resolute was the conduct he +adopted. He decided, with an originality of genius to which the +conqueror of Marengo might have vailed, that the _neck_ of the foe was +the point at which the first fatal shaft of his excommunicating ire +should be hurled. With rapid and decisive energy he concentrated all +his powers for instantaneous action. He retired for a day to the +seclusion of solitude, to summon and to spur the energies of the most +self-reliant mind in Europe, as the lion draws back to gather courage +for the leap. As, like the lion, he drew back; so, like the lion, did +he spring forward upon his prey. At a ball given by the Duchess of +Devonshire, when the whole assembly were conversing upon his supposed +disgrace, and insulting by their malevolence one whom they had +disgusted by their adulation, Brummel suddenly stood in the midst of +them. Could it be indeed Brummel? Could it be mortal who thus appeared +with such an encincture of radiant glory about his neck? Every eye was +upon him, fixed in stupid admiration; every tongue, as it slowly +recovered from its speechless paralysis, faltered forth “what a +cravat!” What a cravat indeed! Hundreds that had, a moment before, +exulted in unwonted freedom, bowed before it with the homage of servile +adoration. What a cravat! There it stood; there was no doubting its +entity, no believing it an illusion. There it stood, smooth and stiff, +yet light and almost transparent; delicate as the music of Ariel, yet +firm as the spirit of Regulus; bending with the grace of Apollo’s +locks, yet erect with the majesty of the Olympian Jove: without a +wrinkle, without an indentation. What a cravat! The regent “saw and +shook;” and uttering a faint gurgle from beneath the wadded bag which +surrounded his royal thorax, he was heard to whisper with dismay, “D—n +him! what a cravat!” The triumph was complete. + +It is stated, upon what authority we know not, that his royal highness, +after passing a sleepless night in vain conjectures, despatched at an +early hour, one of his privy-counsellors to Brummel, offering _carte +blanche_ if he would disclose the secret of that mysterious cravat. But +the “_atrox animus Catonis_” disdained the bribe. He preferred being +supplicated, to being bought, by kings. “Go,” said he to the messenger, +with the spirit of Marius mantling in his veins, “Go, and tell _you_r +master that you have seen _his_ master.” + +For the truth of another anecdote, connected with this cravat, we have +indisputable evidence. A young nobleman of distinguished talents and +high pretensions as to fortune and rank, saw this fatal band, and eager +to advance himself in the rolls of fashion, retired to his chamber to +endeavour to penetrate the method of its construction. He tried every +sort of known, and many sorts of unknown stiffeners to accomplish the +end—paper and pasteboard, and wadding, shavings, and shingles, and +planks,—all were vainly experienced. Gargantua could not have exhibited +a greater invention of expedients than he did; but vainly. After a +fortnight of the closest application, ardour of study and anxiety of +mind combined, brought him to the brink of the grave. His mother having +ascertained the origin of his complaint, waited upon Brummel, who was +the only living man that could remove it. She implored him, by every +human motive, to say but one word, to save the life of her son and +prevent her own misery. But the tyrant was immoveable, and the young +man expired a victim of his sternness. + +When, at length, yielding to that strong necessity which no man can +control, Brummel was obliged, like Napoleon, to abdicate, the mystery +of that mighty cravat was unfolded. There was found, after his +departure to Calais, written on sheet of paper upon his table, the +following epigram of scorn: “STARCH IS THE MAN.” The cravat of Brummel +was merely—starched! Henceforth starch was introduced into every cravat +in Europe. + +Brummel still lives, an obscure consul in a petty European town. + +Physically there is something to command our admiration in the history +of a man who thus lays at his mercy all ranks of men,—the lofty and the +low, the great, the powerful and the vain: but morally and seriously, +no character is more despicable than that of the mere man of fashion, +Seeking nothing but notoriety, his path to that end is over the ruins +of all that is worthy in our nature. He knows virtue only to despise +it; he makes himself acquainted with human feelings only to outrage +them. He commences his career beyond the limits of decency, and ends it +far in the regions of infamy. Feared by all and respected by none, +hated by his worshippers and despised by himself, he rules,—an object +of pity and contempt: and when his power is past, his existence is +forgotten; he lives on in an, oblivion which is to him worse than +death, and the stings of memory goad him to the grave. + +The devotee of fashion is a trifler unworthy of his race; the _mere_ +gentleman is a character which may in time become somewhat tiresome; +there is a just mean between the two, where a better conduct than +either is to be found. It is that of a man who, yielding to others, +still maintains his self-respect, and whose concessions to folly are +controlled by good sense; who remembers the value of trifles without +forgetting the importance of duties, and resolves so to regulate his +conduct that neither others may be offended by his stiffness, nor +himself have to regret his levity. + +Live therefore among men—to conclude our homily after the manner of +Quarles—live therefore among men, like them, yet not disliking thyself; +and let the hues of fashion be reflected from thee, but let them not +enter and colour thee within. + + + + +CHAPTER XV. +MISCELLANEOUS. + + +There is nothing more ill bred in the world than continual talking +about good breeding. + +You should never employ the word “_genteel_;” the proper word is +“_respectable._” + +If you are walking down the street with another person on your arm, and +stop to say something to one of your friends, do not commit the too +common and most awkward error of introducing such persons to one +another. Never introduce morning visitors, who happen to meet in your +parlour without being acquainted. If _you_ should be so introduced, +remember that the acquaintance afterwards goes for nothing: you have +not the slightest right to expect that the other should ever speak to +you. + +If you wish to be introduced to a lady, you must always have her +consent previously asked; this formality it is not necessary to observe +in the case of gentlemen alone. + +Presents are the gauge of friendship. They also serve to increase it, +and give it permanence. + +Among friends presents ought to be made of things of small value; or, +if valuable, their worth should be derived from the style of the +workmanship, or from some accidental circumstance, rather than from the +inherent and solid richness. Especially never offer to a lady a gift of +great cost: it is in the highest degree indelicate, and looks as if you +were desirous of placing her under an obligation to you, and of buying +her good will. The gifts made by ladies to gentlemen are of the most +refined nature possible: they should be little articles not purchased, +but deriving a priceless value as being the offspring of their gentle +skill; a little picture from their pencil, or a trifle from their +needle. + +To persons much your superiors, or gentlemen whom you do not know +intimately, there is but one species of appropriate present—game. + +If you make a present, and it is praised by the receiver, you should +not yourself commence undervaluing it. If one is offered to you, always +accept it; and however small it may be, receive it with civil and +expressed thanks, without any kind of affectation. Avoid all such +deprecatory phrases, as “I fear I rob you,” etc. + +To children, the only presents which you offer are sugar-plums and +bon-bons. + +Avoid the habit of employing French words in English conversation; it +is in extremely bad taste to be always employing such expressions as +_ci-devant_, _soi-disant_, _en masse_, _couleur de rose_, etc. Do not +salute your acquaintances with _bon jour_, nor reply to every +proposition, _volontiers._ + +In speaking of French cities and towns, it is a mark of refinement in +education to pronounce them rigidly according to English rules of +speech. Mr. Fox, the best French scholar, and one of the best bred men +in England, always sounded the x in _Bourdeaux_, and the s in Calais, +and on all occasions pronounced such names just as they are written. + +In society, avoid having those peculiar preferences for some subjects, +which are vulgarly denominated. “_hobby horses._” They make your +company a _bore_ to all your friends; and some kind-hearted creature +will take advantage of them and _trot_ you, for the amusement of the +company. + +A certain degree of reserve, or the appearance of it, should be +maintained in your intercourse with your most intimate friends. To +ordinary acquaintances retain the utmost reserve—never allowing them to +read your feelings, not, on the other hand, attempting to take any +liberties with them. Familiarity of manner is the greatest vice of +society. “Ah! allow me, my dear fellow,” says a rough voice, and at the +same moment a thumb and finger are extended into my snuff-box, which, +in removing their prey drop half of it upon my clothes,—I look up, and +recognize a person to whom I was introduced by mistake last night at +the opera. I would be glad to have less fellowship with such _fellows._ +In former times great philosophers were said to have demons for +familiars,—thereby indicating that a familiar man is the very devil. + +Remember, that all deviations from prescribed forms, on common +occasions, are vulgar; such as sending invitations, or replies, couched +in some unusual forms of speech. Always adhere to the immemorial +phrase,—“Mrs. X. requests the honour of Mr, Y.’s company,” and “Mr. Y. +has the honour of accepting Mrs. X.’s polite invitation.” Never +introduce persons with any outlandish or new-coined expressions; but +perform the operation with mathematical precision—“Mr. A., Mr. A’; Mr. +A’, Mr. A.” + +When two gentlemen are walking with a lady in the street, they should +not be both upon the same side of her, but one of them should walk upon +the outside and the other upon the inside. + +When you walk with a lady, even if the lady be young and unmarried, +offer your arm to her. This is always done in France, and is practised +in this country by the best bred persons. To be sure, this is done only +to married women in France, because unmarried women never walk alone +with gentlemen, but as in America the latter have the same freedom as +the former, this custom should here be extended to them. + +If you are walking with a woman who has your arm, and you cross the +street, it is better not to disengage your arm, and go round upon the +outside. Such effort evinces a palpable attention to form, and _that_ +is always to be avoided. + +A woman should never take the arms of two men, one being upon either +side; nor should a man carry a woman upon each arm. The latter of these +iniquities is practised only in Ireland; the former perhaps in +Kamskatcha. There are, to be sure, some cases in which it is necessary +for the protection of the women, that they should both take his arm, as +in coming home from a concert, or in passing, on any occasion, through +a crowd. + +When you receive company in your own house, you should never be much +dressed. This is a circumstance of the first importance in good +breeding. + +A gentleman should never use perfumes; they are agreeable, however, +upon ladies. + +Avoid the use of proverbs in conversation, and all sorts of cant +phrases. This error is, I believe, censured by Lord Chesterfield, and +is one of the most offensively vulgar things which a person can commit. +We have frequently been astonished to hear such a slang phrase as “the +whole hog” used by persons who had pretensions to very superior +standing. We would be disposed to apply to such an expression a +criticism of Dr. Johnson’s, which rivals it in Coarseness: “It has not +enough salt to keep it from stinking, enough wit to prevent its being +offensive.” We do not wish to advocate any false refinement, or to +encourage any cockney delicacy: but we may be decent without being +affected. The stable language and raft humour of Crockett and Downing +may do very well to amuse one in a morning paper, but it exhibits +little wit and less good sense to adopt them in the drawing-room. This +matter should be “reformed altogether.” + +If a plate be sent to you, at dinner, by the master or mistress of the +house, you should always take it, without offering it to all your +neighbours as was in older times considered necessary. The spirit of +antique manners consisted in exhibiting an attention to ceremony; the +spirit of modern manners consists in avoiding all possible appearance +of form. The old custom of deferring punctiliously to others was +awkward and inconvenient. For, the person, in favor of whom the +courtesy was shown, shocked at the idea of being exceeded in +politeness, of course declined it, and a plate was thus often kept +vibrating between two bowing mandarins, till its contents were cold, +and the victims of ceremony were deprived of their dinner. In a case +like this, to reverse the decision which the host has made as to the +relative standing of his guests, is but a poor compliment to him, as it +seems to reprove his choice, and may, besides, materially interfere +with his arrangements by rendering _unhelped_ a person whom he supposes +attended to. + +The same avoidance of too much attention to yielding place is proper in +most other cases. Shenstone, in some clever verses, has ridiculed the +folly; and Goldsmith, in his “Vicar,” has censured the inconvenience, +of such outrageous formality. These things are now managed better. One +person yields and another accepts without any controversy. + +When you are helped to anything at a dinner table, do not wait, with +your plate untouched, until others have begun to eat. This stiff-piece +of mannerism is often occurring in the country, and indeed among all +persons who are not thoroughly bred. As soon as your plate is placed +before you, you should take up your knife and arrange the table +furniture around you, if you do not actually eat. + +As to the instruments by which the operation of dining is conducted, it +is a matter of much consequence that entire propriety should be +observed as to their use. We have said nothing about the use of silver +forks, because we do not write for savages; and where, excepting among +savages, shall we find any who at present eat with other than a French +fork?. There are occasionally to be found some ancients, gentlemen of +the old school, as it is termed, who persist in preferring steel, and +who will insist on calling for a steel fork if there is none on the +table. They consider the modem custom an affectation, and deem that all +affectation should be avoided. They tread upon the pride of Plato, with +more pride. There is often affectation in shunning affectation. It is +better in things not material to submit to the established habits, +especially when, as in the present case, the balance of convenience is +decidedly on the part of fashion. The ordinary custom among well bred +persons, is as follows:—soup is taken with a spoon. Some foolish +_fashionables_ employ a fork! They might as well make use of a +broomstick. The fish which follows is eaten with a fork, a knife not +being used at all. The fork is held in the right hand, and a piece of +bread in the left. For any dish in which cutting is not indispensable, +the same arrangement is correct. When you have upon your plate, before +the dessert, anything partially liquid, or any sauces, you must not +take them up with a knife, but with a piece of bread, which is to be +saturated with the juices, and then lifted to the mouth. If such an +article forms part of the dessert, you should eat it with a spoon. In +carving, steel instruments alone are employed. For fowls a peculiar +knife is used, having the blade short and the handle very long. For +fish a broad and pierced silver blade is used. + +A dinner—we allude to _dinner-parties_—in this country, is generally +despatched with too much hurry. We do not mean, that persons commonly +eat too fast, but that the courses succeed one another too +precipitately. Dinner is the last operation of the day, and there is no +subsequent business which demands haste. It is usually intended, +especially when there are no ladies, to sit at the table till nine, +ten, or eleven o’clock, and it is more agreeable that the _eating_ +should be prolonged through a considerable portion of the entire time. +The conveniences of digestion also require more deliberation, and it +would therefore not be unpleasant if an interval of a quarter of an +hour or half an hour were allowed to intervene between the meats and +the dessert. + +At dinner, avoid taking upon your plate too many things at once. One +variety of meat and one kind of vegetable is the _maximum._ When you +take another sort of meat, or any dish not properly a vegetable, you +always change your plate. + +The fashion of dining inordinately late in this country is foolish. It +is borrowed from England without any regard to the difference in +circumstances between the two nations. In London, the whole system of +daily duties is much later. The fact of parliament’s sitting during the +evening and not in the morning, tends to remove the active part of the +day to a much more advanced hour. When persons rise at ten or two +o’clock, it is not to be expected that they should dine till eight or +twelve in the evening. There is nothing of this sort in France. There +they dine at three, or earlier. We have known some fashionable dinners +in different cities in this country at so late an hour as eight or nine +o’clock. This is absurd, where the persons have all breakfasted at +eight in the morning. From four o’clock till five varies the proper +hour for a dinner party here. + +Never talk about politics at a dinner table or in a drawing room. + +When you are going into a company it is of advantage to run over in +your mind, beforehand, the topics of conversation which you intend to +bring up, and to arrange the manner in which you will introduce them. +You may also refresh your general ideas upon the subjects, and run +through the details of the few very brief and sprightly anecdotes which +you are going to repeat; and also have in readiness one or two +brilliant phrases or striking words which you will use upon occasion. +Further than this it is dangerous to make much preparation. If you +commit to memory long speeches with the design of delivering them, your +conversation will become formal, and you will be negligent of the +observations of your company. It will tend also to impair that habit of +readiness and quickness which it is necessary to cultivate in order to +be agreeable. + +You must be very careful that you do not repeat the same anecdotes or +let off the same good things twice to the same person. Richard Sharpe, +the “conversationist” as he was called in London, kept a regular book +of entry, in which he recorded where and before whom he had uttered +severally his choice sayings. The celebrated Bubb Doddington prepared a +manuscript book of original _facetiæ_, which he was accustomed to read +over when he expected any distinguished company, trusting to an +excellent memory to preserve him from iteration. + +If you accompany your wife to a ball, be very careful not to dance with +her. + +The lady who gives a ball dances but little, and always selects her +partners. + +If you are visited by any company whom you wish to drive away forever, +or any friends whom you wish to alienate, entertain them by reading to +them your own productions. + +If you ask a lady to dance, and she is engaged, do not prefer a request +for her hand at the next set after that, because she may be engaged for +that also, and for many more; and you would have to run through a long +list of interrogatories, which would be absurd and awkward. + +A gentleman must not expect to shine in society, even the most +frivolous, without a considerable stock of knowledge. He must be +acquainted with facts rather than principles. He needs no very sublime +sciences; but a knowledge of biography and literary history, of the +fine arts, as painting, engraving, music, etc., will be of great +service to him. + +Some men are always seen in the streets with an umbrella under their +arm. Such a foible may be permitted to such men as Mr. Southey and the +Duke of Wellington: but in ordinary men it looks like affectation, and +the monotony is exceedingly _boring_ to the sight. + +To applaud at a play is not _fashionable_; but it is _respectable_ to +evince by a gentle concurrence of one finger and a hand that you +perceive and enjoy a good stroke in an actor. + +If you are at a concert, or a private musical party, never beat time +with your feet or your cane. Nothing is more unpleasant. + +Few things are more agreeable or more difficult, than to relate +anecdotes with entire propriety. They should be introduced gracefully, +have fit connexion with the previous remarks, and be in perfect keeping +with the company, the subject and the tone of the conversation; they +should be short, witty and eloquent, and they should be new but not +far-fetched. + +In rapid and eager discourse, when persons are excited and impatient, +as at a ball or in a promenade, repeat nothing but the spirit and soul +of a story, leaping over the particulars. There are however many places +and occasions in which you may bring out the details with advantage, +precisely, but not tediously. When you repeat a true story be always +extremely exact. Mem. Not to forget the point of your story, like most +narrators. + +When you are telling a flat anecdote by mistake, laugh egregiously, +that others may do the same: when you repeat a spirited and striking +bon mot, be grave and composed, in order that others may not be the +same. + +For one who has travelled much, to hit the proper medium between too +much reserve and too much intrusion, on the subject of his adventures, +is not easy. Such a person is expected to give amusement by pleasant +histories of his travels, and it is agreeable that he should do so, yet +with moderation; he should not reply to every remark by a memoir, +commencing, “When I was in Japan.” + +Rampant witticisms which require one to laugh, are apt to grow +fatiguing: it is better to have a sprightly and amusing vein running +through your conversation, which, betraying no effort, allows one to be +grave without offence, or to smile without pain. + +Punning is now decidedly out of date. It is a silly and displeasing +thing, when it becomes a habit. Some one has called it the wit of +fools. It is within the reach of the most trifling, and is often used +by them to puzzle and degrade the wise. Whatever may be its merits, it +is now out of fashion. + +It is respectable to go to church once on Sunday. When you are there, +behave with decency. You should never walk in fashionable places on +Sunday afternoon. It is notoriously vulgar. If your health requires you +to take the air, you should seek some retired street. + +In conversation avoid such phrases as “My _dear_ sir or madam.” + +A gentleman is distinguished as much by his composure as by any other +quality. His exertions are always subdued, and his efforts easy. He is +never surprised into an exclamation or startled by anything. Throughout +life he avoids what the French call _scenes_, occasions of exhibition, +in which the vulgar delight. He of course has feelings, but he never +exhibits any to the world. He hears of the death of his pointer or the +loss of an estate with entire calmness when others are present. + +It is very difficult for a literary man to preserve the perfect manners +and exact semblance of a gentleman. He must be able to throw aside all +the qualities which authorship tends to stamp so deeply upon him, and +thoroughly to despise the cant of the profession. Yet this must be done +without any affectation. Upon the whole, unless he has rare tact, he +will please as much by going into company with all the marks of his +employment upon his manners, than by awkwardly attempting to throw off +his load. One would rather see a man with his fingers inked, than to +see him nervously striving to cover them with a tattered kid glove. As +to literary ladies, they make up their minds to sacrifice all present +and personal admiration for future and abiding renown. + +It is not considered fashionable to carry a watch. What has a +fashionable man to do with time? Besides he never goes into those +obscure parts of the town where there are no public clocks, and his +servant will tell him when it is time to dress for dinner. A gentleman +carries his watch in his pantaloons with a plain black ribbon attached. +It is only worthy of a shop-boy to put it in his waistcoat pocket. + +Custom allows to men the privilege of taking snuff, however unneat this +habit may appear. If you affect the “tangible smell,” always take it +from a box, and not from your waistcoat pocket or a paper. The common +opinion, that Napoleon took snuff from his pocket, (which fact, by the +way, is denied by Bourrienne,) has for ever driven this convenient +custom from the practice of gentlemen, for the same reason that Lord +Byron’s anti-neckcloth fashion has compelled every man of sense to bind +a cravat religiously about his throat. As to taking snuff from a paper, +it is vile. + +Women should abstain most scrupulously from tobacco, for nothing can be +more fatal to their divinity: they should at least avoid it until past +fifty;—that is to say, if a woman past fifty can anywhere be found. +Chewing is permitted only to galley-slaves and metaphysicians. + +It was a favourite maxim of Rivarol, “Do you wish to succeed? Cite +proper names.” Rivarol is dead in exile, having left behind him little +property and less reputation. Judging from all experience, if we were +to frame an extreme maxim, it should be, “If you wish to succeed never +cite a proper name.” It will make you agreeable and hated. Your +conversation will be listened to with interest, and your company +shunned with horror. You will obtain the reputation of a gossip and a +scandal-bearer, and you will soon be obliged either to purchase a razor +or apply for a passport. If you are holding a tete-a-tete with a +notorious Mrs. Candour, then, indeed, your tongue should be as sharp +and nimble as the forked lightning. You must beat her at her own +weapons, and convince her that it would be dangerous to traduce your +character to others. + +A bachelor is a person who enjoys everything and pays for nothing; a +married man is one that pays for everything and enjoys nothing. The one +drives a sulky through life, and is not expected to take care of any +one but himself: the other keeps a carriage, which is always too full +to afford him a comfortable seat. Be cautious then how you exchange +your sulky for a carriage. + +In ordinary conversation about persons employ the expressions _men_ and +_women_; _gentleman_ and _lady_ are _distinctive_ appellations, and not +to be used upon general occasions. + +You should say _forte-piano_, not _piano-forte_: and the _street door_, +not the _front door._ + +“A man may have virtue, capacity, and good conduct,” says La Bruyère, +“and yet be insupportable; the air and manner which we neglect, as +little things, are frequently what the world judges us by, and makes +them decide for or against us.” + +In your intercourse with the world you must take persons as they are, +and society as you find it. You must never oppose the one, nor attempt +to alter the other. Society is a harlequin stage, upon which you never +appear in your own dress nor without a mask. Keep your real +dispositions for your fireside, and your real character for your +private friend. In public, never differ from anybody, nor from +anything. The _agreeable_ man is one who _agrees._ + +THE END. + + + + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAWS OF ETIQUETTE *** + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will +be renamed. + +Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright +law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, +so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the +United States without permission and without paying copyright +royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part +of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm +concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, +and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following +the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use +of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for +copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very +easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation +of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project +Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may +do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected +by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark +license, especially commercial redistribution. + +START: FULL LICENSE + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full +Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at +www.gutenberg.org/license. + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or +destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your +possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a +Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound +by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the +person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph +1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this +agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the +Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection +of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual +works in the collection are in the public domain in the United +States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the +United States and you are located in the United States, we do not +claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, +displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as +all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope +that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting +free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm +works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the +Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily +comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the +same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when +you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are +in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, +check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this +agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, +distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any +other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no +representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any +country other than the United States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other +immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear +prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work +on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, +performed, viewed, copied or distributed: + + This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and + most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no + restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it + under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this + eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the + United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where + you are located before using this eBook. + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is +derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not +contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the +copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in +the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are +redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply +either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or +obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm +trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any +additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms +will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works +posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the +beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including +any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access +to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format +other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official +version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website +(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense +to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means +of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain +Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the +full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +provided that: + +* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed + to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has + agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid + within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are + legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty + payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in + Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg + Literary Archive Foundation." + +* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all + copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue + all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm + works. + +* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of + any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of + receipt of the work. + +* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than +are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing +from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of +the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set +forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project +Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may +contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate +or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or +other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or +cannot be read by your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium +with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you +with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in +lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person +or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second +opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If +the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing +without further opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO +OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of +damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement +violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the +agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or +limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or +unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the +remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in +accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the +production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, +including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of +the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this +or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or +additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any +Defect you cause. + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of +computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It +exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations +from people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future +generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see +Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at +www.gutenberg.org + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by +U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, +Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up +to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website +and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without +widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND +DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular +state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To +donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project +Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be +freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and +distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of +volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in +the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not +necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper +edition. + +Most people start at our website which has the main PG search +facility: www.gutenberg.org + +This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + diff --git a/5681-0.zip b/5681-0.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..227c013 --- /dev/null +++ b/5681-0.zip diff --git a/5681-h.zip b/5681-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d3e68e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/5681-h.zip diff --git a/5681-h/5681-h.htm b/5681-h/5681-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4f06c90 --- /dev/null +++ b/5681-h/5681-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,3443 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" +"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> +<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Laws of Etiquette, by A Gentleman</title> + +<style type="text/css"> + +body { margin-left: 20%; + margin-right: 20%; + text-align: justify; } + +h1, h2, h3, h4, h5 {text-align: center; font-style: normal; font-weight: +normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-top: .5em; margin-bottom: .5em;} + +h1 {font-size: 300%; + margin-top: 0.6em; + margin-bottom: 0.6em; + letter-spacing: 0.12em; + word-spacing: 0.2em; + text-indent: 0em;} +h2 {font-size: 150%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em;} +h3 {font-size: 130%; margin-top: 1em;} +h4 {font-size: 120%;} +h5 {font-size: 110%;} + +.no-break {page-break-before: avoid;} /* for epubs */ + +div.chapter {page-break-before: always; margin-top: 4em;} + +hr {width: 80%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em;} + +p {text-indent: 1em; + margin-top: 0.25em; + margin-bottom: 0.25em; } + +p.poem {text-indent: 0%; + margin-left: 10%; + font-size: 90%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; } + +p.letter {text-indent: 0%; + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; } + +p.center {text-align: center; + text-indent: 0em; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; } + +p.footnote {font-size: 90%; + text-indent: 0%; + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; } + +a:link {color:blue; text-decoration:none} +a:visited {color:blue; text-decoration:none} +a:hover {color:red} + +</style> + +</head> + +<body> + +<div style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Laws of Etiquette, by A Gentleman</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and +most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions +whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms +of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online +at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you +are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the +country where you are located before using this eBook. +</div> +<div style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: The Laws of Etiquette</div> +<div style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: A Gentleman</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: August 7, 2002 [eBook #5681]<br /> +[Most recently updated: September 8, 2021]</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Character set encoding: UTF-8</div> +<div style='display:block; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Produced by: Holly Ingraham</div> +<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAWS OF ETIQUETTE ***</div> + +<h1>The Laws of Etiquette</h1> + +<h3>or,<br /> +Short Rules and Reflections<br /> +for<br /> +CONDUCT IN SOCIETY.</h3> + +<h2 class="no-break">by A Gentleman</h2> + +<h4>PHILADELPHIA:</h4> + +<h5>1836.</h5> + +<hr /> + +<p class="letter"> +Transcriber’s Note: Note the inconsistency of “Brummell” in +one place of the original, and “Brummel” all other places. Also +“Shakspeare,” “Don Quixotte,” “Sir Piercy,” +and “Esop” are as in the original. +</p> + +<hr /> + +<h2>Contents</h2> + +<table summary="" style=""> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#pref01">PREFACE</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#pref02">INTRODUCTION</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap01">CHAPTER I. GOOD BREEDING.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap02">CHAPTER II. DRESS.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap03">CHAPTER III. SALUTATIONS.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap04">CHAPTER IV. THE DRAWING-ROOM. COMPANY. CONVERSATION.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap05">CHAPTER V. THE ENTRANCE INTO SOCIETY.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap06">CHAPTER VI. LETTERS.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap07">CHAPTER VII. VISITS.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap08">CHAPTER VIII. APPOINTMENTS AND PUNCTUALITY.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap09">CHAPTER IX. DINNER.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap10">CHAPTER X. TRAVELLING.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap11">CHAPTER XI. BALLS.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap12">CHAPTER XII. FUNERALS.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap13">CHAPTER XIII. SERVANTS.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap14">CHAPTER XIV. FASHION.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> <a href="#chap15">CHAPTER XV. MISCELLANEOUS.</a></td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="pref01"></a>PREFACE</h2> + +<p> +The author of the present volume has endeavoured to embody, in as short a space +as possible, some of the results of his own experience and observation in +society, and submits the work to the public, with the hope that the remarks +which are contained in it, may prove available for the benefit of others. It +is, of course, scarcely possible that anything original should be found in a +volume like this: almost all that it contains must have fallen under the notice +of every man of penetration who has been in the habit of frequenting good +society. Many of the precepts have probably been contained in works of a +similar character which have appeared in England and France since the days of +Lord Chesterfield. Nothing however has been copied from them in the compilation +of this work, the author having in fact scarcely any acquaintance with books of +this description, and many years having elapsed since he has opened even the +pages of the noble oracle. He has drawn entirely from his own resources, with +the exception of some hints for arrangement, and a few brief reflections, which +have been derived from the French. +</p> + +<p> +The present volume is almost apart from criticism. It has no pretensions to be +judged as a literary work—its sole merit depending upon its correctness +and fitness of application. Upon these grounds he ventures to hope for it a +favourable reception. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="pref02"></a>INTRODUCTION</h2> + +<p> +The great error into which nearly all foreigners and most Americans fall, who +write or speak of society in this country, arises from confounding the +political with the social system. In most other countries, in England, France, +and all those nations whose government is monarchical or aristocratic, these +systems are indeed similar. Society is there intimately connected with the +government, and the distinctions in one are the origin of gradations in the +other. The chief part of the society of the kingdom is assembled in the +capital, and the same persons who legislate for the country legislate also for +it. But in America the two systems are totally unconnected, and altogether +different in character. In remodelling the form of the administration, society +remained unrepublican. There is perfect freedom of political privilege, all are +the same upon the hustings, or at a political meeting; but this equality does +not extend to the drawing-room or the parlour. None are excluded from the +highest councils of the nation, but it does not follow that all can enter into +the highest ranks, of society. In point of fact, we think that there is more +exclusiveness in the society of this country, than there is in that even of +England—far more than there is in France. And the explanation may perhaps +be found in the fact which we hate mentioned above. There being <i>there</i> +less danger of permanent disarrangement or confusion of ranks by the occasional +admission of the low-born aspirant, there does not exist the same necessity for +a jealous guarding of the barriers as there does here. The distinction of +classes, also, after the first or second, is actually more clearly defined, and +more rigidly observed in America, than in any country of Europe. Persons +unaccustomed to look searchingly at these matters, may be surprised to hear it; +but we know from observation, that there are among the respectable, in any city +of the United States, at least ten distinct ranks. We cannot, of course, here +point them out, because we could not do it without mentioning names. +</p> + +<p> +Every man is naturally desirous of finding entrance into the best society of +his country, and it becomes therefore a matter of importance to ascertain what +qualifications are demanded for admittance. +</p> + +<p> +A writer who is popularly unpopular, has remarked, that the test of standing in +Boston, is literary eminence; in New York, wealth; and in Philadelphia, purity +of blood. +</p> + +<p> +To this remark, we can only oppose our opinion, that none of these are +indispensable, and none of them sufficient. The society of this country, unlike +that of England, does not court literary talent. We have cases in our +recollection, which prove the remark, in relation to the highest ranks, even of +Boston. Wealth has no pretensions to be the standard anywhere. In New York, the +Liverpool of America, although the rich may make greater display and +<i>bruit</i>, yet all of the merely rich, will find that there does exist a +small and unchanging circle, whether above or below them, ‘it is not ours +to say,’ yet completely apart from them, into which they would rejoice to +find entrance, and from which they would be glad to receive emigrants. +</p> + +<p> +Whatever may be the accomplishments necessary to render one capable of reaching +the highest platform of social eminence, and it is not easy to define clearly +what they are, there is one thing, and one alone, which will enable any man to +<i>retain</i> his station there; and that is, GOOD BREEDING. Without it, we +believe that literature, wealth, and even blood, will be unsuccessful. By it, +if it co-exist with a certain capacity of affording pleasure by conversation, +any one, we imagine, could frequent the very best society in every city of +America, and <i>perhaps the very best alone.</i> To obtain, then, the manners +of a gentleman is a matter of no small importance. +</p> + +<p> +We do not pretend that a man will be metamorphosed into a gentleman by reading +this book, or any other book. Refined manners are like refined style which +Cicero compares to the colour of the cheeks, which is not acquired by sudden or +violent exposure to heat, but by continual walking in the sun. Good manners can +certainly only be acquired by much usage in good company. But there are a +number of little forms, imperiously enacted by custom, which may be taught in +this manner, and the conscious ignorance of which often prevents persons from +going into company at all. +</p> + +<p> +These forms may be abundantly absurd, but still they <i>must</i> be attended +to; for one half the world does and always will observe them, and the other +half is at a great disadvantage if it does not. Intercourse is constantly +taking place, and an awkward man of letters, in the society of a polished man +of the world, is like a strong man contending with a skilful fencer. Mr. +Addison says, that he once saw the ablest mathematician in the kingdom utterly +embarrassed, from not knowing whether he ought to stand or sit when my lord +duke drank his health. +</p> + +<p> +Some of the many errors which are liable to be committed through ignorance of +usage, are pleasantly pointed out in the following story, which is related by a +French writer. +</p> + +<p> +The Abbé Cosson, professor in the <i>Collége Mazarin</i>, thoroughly +accomplished in the art of teaching, saturated with Greek, Latin, and +literature, considered himself a perfect well of science: he had no conception +that a man who knew all Persius and Horace by heart could possibly commit an +error—above all, an error at table. But it was not long before he +discovered his mistake. One day, after dining with the Abbé de Radonvillers at +Versailles, in company with several courtiers and marshals of France, he was +boasting of the rare acquaintance with etiquette and custom which he had +exhibited at dinner. The Abbé Delille, who heard this eulogy upon his own +conduct, interrupted his harangue, by offering to wager that he had committed +at least a hundred improprieties at the table. “How is it +possible!” exclaimed Cosson. “I did exactly like the rest of the +company.” +</p> + +<p> +“What absurdity!” said the other. “You did a thousand things +which no one else did. First, when you sat down at the table, what did you do +with your napkin?” “My napkin? Why just what every body else did +with theirs. I unfolded it entire]y, and fastened it to my buttonhole.” +“Well, my dear friend,” said Delille, “you were the only one +that did <i>that</i>, at all events. No one hangs up his napkin in that style; +they are contented with placing it on their knees. And what did you, do when +you took your soup?” “Like the others, I believe. I took my spoon +in one hand, and my fork in the other—” “Your fork! Who ever +eat soup with a fork?—But to proceed; after your soup, what did you +eat?” “A fresh egg.” “And what did you do with the +shell?” “Handed it to the servant who stood behind my chair.” +“With out breaking it?” “Without breaking it, of +course.” “Well, my dear Abbé, nobody ever eats an egg without +breaking the shell. And after your egg—?” “I asked the Abbé +Radonvillers to send me a piece of the hen near him.” “Bless my +soul! a piece of the <i>hen</i>? You never speak of hens excepting in the +barn-yard. You should have asked for fowl or chicken. But you say nothing of +your mode of drinking.” “Like all the rest, I asked for +<i>claret</i> and <i>champagne.</i>” “Let me inform you, then, that +persons always ask for <i>claret wine</i> and <i>champagne wine.</i> But, tell +me, how did you eat your bread?” “Surely I did that properly. I cut +it with my knife, in the most regular manner possible.” “Bread +should always be broken, not cut. But the coffee, how did you manage it?” +“It was rather too hot, and I poured a little of it into my +saucer.” “Well, you committed here the greatest fault of all. You +should never pour your coffee into the saucer, but always drink it from the +cup.” The poor Abbé was confounded. He felt that though one might be +master of the seven sciences, yet that there was another species of knowledge +which, if less dignified, was equally important. +</p> + +<p> +This occurred many years ago, but there is not one of the observances neglected +by the Abbé Cosson, which is not enforced with equal rigidness in the present +day. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap01"></a>CHAPTER I.<br /> +GOOD BREEDING.</h2> + +<p> +The formalities of refined society were at first established for the purpose of +facilitating the intercourse of persons of the same standing, and increasing +the happiness of all to whom they apply. They are now kept up, both to assist +the convenience of intercourse and to prevent too great familiarity. If they +are carried too far, and escape from the control of good sense, they become +impediments to enjoyment. Among the Chinese they serve only the purpose of +annoying to an incalculable degree. “The government,” says De +Marcy, in writing of China, “constantly applies itself to preserve, not +only in the court and among the great, but among the people themselves, a +constant habit of civility and courtesy. The Chinese have an infinity of books +upon such subjects; one of these treatises contains more than three thousand +articles.— Everything is pointed out with the most minute detail; the +manner of saluting, of visiting, of making presents, of writing letters, of +eating, etc.: and these customs have the force of laws—no one can +dispense with them. There is a special tribunal at Peking, of which it is one +of the chief duties, to ensure the observance of these civil ordinances?” +</p> + +<p> +One would think that one was here reading an account of the capital of France. +It depends, then, upon the spirit in which these forms are observed, whether +their result shall be beneficial or not. The French and the Chinese are the +most formal of all the nations. Yet the one is the stiffest and most distant; +the other, the easiest and most social. +</p> + +<p> +“We may define politeness,” says La Bruyère, “though we +cannot tell where to fix it in practice. It observes received usages and +customs, is bound to times and places, and is not the same thing in the two +sexes or in different conditions. Wit alone cannot obtain it: it is acquired +and brought to perfection by emulation. Some dispositions alone are susceptible +of politeness, as others are only capable of great talents or solid virtues. It +is true politeness puts merit forward, and renders it agreeable, and a man must +have eminent qualifications to support himself without it.” Perhaps even +the greatest merit cannot successfully straggle against unfortunate and +disagreeable manners. Lord Chesterfield says that the Duke of Marlborough owed +his first promotions to the suavity of his manners, and that without it he +could not have risen. +</p> + +<p> +La Bruyère has elsewhere given this happy definition of politeness, the other +passage being rather a description of it. “Politeness seems to be a +certain care, by the manner of our words and actions, to make others pleased +with us and themselves.” +</p> + +<p> +We must here stop to point out an error which is often committed both in +practice and opinion, and which consists in confounding together the gentleman +and the man of fashion. No two characters can be more distinct than these. Good +sense and self-respect are the foundations of the one—notoriety and +influence the objects of the other. Men of fashion are to be seen everywhere: a +pure and mere gentleman is the rarest thing alive. Brummel was a man of +fashion; but it would be a perversion of terms to apply to him “a very +expressive word in our language,—a word, denoting an assemblage of many +real virtues and of many qualities approaching to virtues, and an union of +manners at once pleasing and commanding respect,— the word +gentleman.”* The requisites to compose this last character are natural +ease of manner, and an acquaintance with the “outward habit of +encounter”—dignity and self-possession—a respect for all the +decencies of life, and perfect freedom from all affectation. Dr. +Johnson’s bearing during his interview with the king showed him to be a +thorough gentleman, and demonstrates how rare and elevated that character is. +When his majesty expressed in the language of compliment his high opinion of +Johnson’s merits, the latter bowed in silence. If Chesterfield could have +retained sufficient presence of mind to have done the same on such an occasion, +he would have applauded himself to the end of his days. So delicate is the +nature of those qualities that constitute a gentleman, that there is but one +exhibition of this description of persons in all the literary and dramatic +fictions from Shakespeare downward. Scott has not attempted it. Bulwer, in +“Pelham,” has shot wide of the mark. It was reserved for the author +of two very singular productions, “Sydenham” and its continuation +“Alice Paulet”—works of extraordinary merits and +extraordinary faults—to portray this character completely, in the person +of Mr. Paulet. +</p> + +<p class="footnote"> +* Charles Butler’s Reminiscences +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap02"></a>CHAPTER II.<br /> +DRESS.</h2> + +<p> +First impressions are apt to be permanent; it is therefore of importance that +they should be favourable. The dress of an individual is that circumstance from +which you first form your opinion of him. It is even more prominent than +manner, It is indeed the only thing which is remarked in a casual encounter, or +during the first interview. It, therefore, should be the first care. +</p> + +<p> +What style is to our thoughts, dress is to our persons. It may supply the place +of more solid qualities, and without it the most solid are of little avail. +Numbers have owed their elevation to their attention to the toilet. Place, +fortune, marriage have all been lost by neglecting it. A man need not mingle +long with the world to find occasion to exclaim with Sedaine, “Ah! mon +habit, que je vous remercie!” In spite of the proverb, the dress often +<i>does</i> make the monk. +</p> + +<p> +Your dress should always be consistent with your age and your natural exterior. +That which looks outr, on one man, will be agreeable on another. As success in +this respect depends almost entirely upon particular circumstances and personal +peculiarities, it is impossible to give general directions of much importance. +We can only point out the field for study and research; it belongs to each +one’s own genius and industry to deduce the results. However ugly you may +be, rest assured that there is some style of habiliment which will make you +passable. +</p> + +<p> +If, for example, you have a stain upon your cheek which rivals in brilliancy +the best Chateau-Margout; or, are afflicted with a nose whose lustre dims the +ruby, you may employ such hues of dress, that the eye, instead of being shocked +by the strangeness of the defect, will be charmed by the graceful harmony of +the colours. Every one cannot indeed be an Adonis, but it is his own fault if +he is an Esop. +</p> + +<p> +If you have bad, squinting eyes, which have lost their lashes and are bordered +with red, you should wear spectacles. If the defect be great, your glasses +should be coloured. In such cases emulate the sky rather than the sea: green +spectacles are an abomination, fitted only for students in divinity,— +blue ones are respectable and even <i>distingué.</i> +</p> + +<p> +Almost every defect of face may be concealed by a judicious use and arrangement +of hair. Take care, however, that your hair be not of one colour and your +whiskers of another; and let your wig be large enough to cover the <i>whole</i> +of your red or white hair. +</p> + +<p> +It is evident, therefore, that though a man may be ugly, there is no necessity +for his being shocking. Would that all men were convinced of this! I verily +believe that if Mr. — in his walking-dress, and Mr. — in his +evening costume were to meet alone, in some solitary place, where there was +nothing to divert their attention from one another, they would expire of mutual +hideousness. +</p> + +<p> +If you have any defect, so striking and so ridiculous as to procure you a +<i>nickname</i> then indeed there is but one remedy,—renounce society. +</p> + +<p> +In the morning, before eleven o’clock even if you go out, you should not +be dressed. You would be stamped a <i>parvenu</i> if you were seen in anything +better than a reputable old frock coat. If you remain at home, and are a +bachelor, it is permitted to receive visitors in a morning gown. In summer, +calico; in winter, figured cloth, faced with fur. At dinner, a coat, of course, +is indispensable. +</p> + +<p> +The effect of a frock coat is to conceal the height. If, therefore, you are +beneath the ordinary statue, or much above it, you should affect frock coats on +all occasions that etiquette permits. +</p> + +<p> +Before going to a ball or party it is not sufficient that you consult your +mirror twenty times. You must be personally inspected by your servant or a +friend. Through defect of this, I once saw a gentleman enter a ball-room, +attired with scrupulous elegance, but with one of his suspenders curling in +graceful festoons about his feet. His glass could not show what was behind. +</p> + +<p> +If you are about to present yourself in a company composed only of men, you may +wear boots. If there be but one lady present, pumps and silk-stockings are +indispensable. +</p> + +<p> +There is a common proverb which says, that if a man be well dressed as to head +and feet, he may present himself everywhere. The assertion is as false as Mr. +Kemble’s voice. Happy indeed if it were necessary to perfect only the +extremities. The coat, the waistcoat, the gloves, and, above all, the cravat, +must be alike ignorant of blemish. +</p> + +<p> +Upon the subject of the cravat—(for heaven’s sake and +Brummel’s, never appear in a stock after twelve o’clock)—We +cannot at present say anything. If we were to say anything, we could not be +content without saying all, and to say all would require a folio. A book has +been published upon the subject, entitled “The Cravat considered in its +moral, literary, political, military, and religious attributes.” This and +a clever, though less profound, treatise on “The art of tying the +Cravat,” are as indispensable to a gentleman as an ice at twelve +o’clock. +</p> + +<p> +When we speak of excellence in dress we do not mean richness of clothing, nor +manifested elaboration. Faultless propriety, perfect harmony, and a refined +simplicity,—these are the charms which fascinate here. +</p> + +<p> +It is as great a sin to be finical in dress as to be negligent. +</p> + +<p> +Upon this subject the ladies are the only infallible oracles. Apart from the +perfection to which they must of necessity arrive, from devoting their entire +existence to such considerations, they seem to be endued with an inexpressible +tact, a sort of sixth sense, which reveals intuitively the proper distinctions. +That your dress is approved by a man is nothing;—you cannot enjoy the +high satisfaction of being perfectly comme il faut, until your performance has +received the seal of a woman’s approbation. +</p> + +<p> +If the benefits to be derived from cultivating your exterior do not appear +sufficiently powerful to induce attention, the inconveniences arising from too +great disregard may perhaps prevail. Sir Matthew Hale, in the earlier part of +his life, dressed so badly that he was once seized by the press-gang. Not long +since, as I entered the hall of a public hotel, I saw a person so villainously +habited, that supposing him to be one of the servants, I desired him to take my +luggage upstairs, and was on the point of offering him a shilling, when I +discovered that I was addressing the Honorable Mr. * * *, one of the most +eminent American statesmen. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap03"></a>CHAPTER III.<br /> +SALUTATIONS.</h2> + +<p> +The salutation, says a French writer, is the touchstone of good breeding. +According to circumstances, it should be respectful, cordial, civil, +affectionate or familiar:—an inclination of the head, a gesture with the +hand, the touching or doffing of the hat. +</p> + +<p> +If you remove your hat you need not at the same time bend the dorsal vertebræ +of your body, unless you wish to be very reverential, as in saluting a bishop. +</p> + +<p> +It is a mark of high breeding not to speak to a lady in the street, until you +perceive that she has noticed you by an inclination of the head. +</p> + +<p> +Some ladies <i>courtesy</i> in the street, a movement not gracefully consistent +with locomotion. They should always <i>bow.</i> +</p> + +<p> +If an individual of the lowest rank, or without any rank at all, takes off his +hat to you, you should do the same in return. A bow, says La Fontaine, is a +note drawn at sight. If you acknowledge it, you must pay the full amount. The +two best-bred men in England, Charles the Second and George the Fourth, never +failed to take off their hats to the meanest of their subjects. +</p> + +<p> +Avoid condescending bows to your friends and equals. If you meet a rich +parvenu, whose consequence you wish to reprove, you may salute him in a very +patronizing manner: or else, in acknowledging his bow, look somewhat surprised +and say, “Mister—eh—eh?” +</p> + +<p> +If you have remarkably fine teeth, you may smile affectionately upon the bowee, +without speaking. +</p> + +<p> +In passing ladies of rank, whom you meet in society, bow, but do not speak. +</p> + +<p> +If you have anything to say to any one in the street, especially a lady, +however intimate you may be, do not stop the person, but turn round and walk in +company; you can take leave at the end of the street. +</p> + +<p> +If there is any one of your acquaintance, with whom you have a difference, do +not avoid looking at him, unless from the nature of things the quarrel is +necessarily for life. It is almost always better to bow with cold civility, +though without speaking. +</p> + +<p> +As a general rule never <i>cut</i> any one in the street. Even political and +steamboat acquaintances should be noticed by the slightest movement in the +world. If they presume to converse with you, or stop you to introduce their +companion, it is then time to use your eye-glass, and say, “I never knew +you.” +</p> + +<p> +If you address a lady in the open air, you remain uncovered until she has +desired you <i>twice</i> to put on your hat. In general, if you are in any +place where <i>etiquette</i> requires you to remain uncovered or standing, and +a lady, or one much your superior, requests you to be covered or to sit, you +may how off the command. If it is repeated, you should comply. You thereby pay +the person a marked, but delicate, compliment, by allowing their will to be +superior to the general obligations of etiquette. +</p> + +<p> +When two Americans, who “have not been introduced,” meet in some +public place, as in a theatre, a stagecoach, or a steamboat, they will sit for +an hour staring in one another’s faces, but without a word of +conversation. This form of unpoliteness has been adopted from the English, and +it is as little worthy of imitation as the form of their government. Good sense +and convenience are the foundations of good breeding; and it is assuredly +vastly more reasonable and more agreeable to enjoy a passing gratification, +when no sequent evil is to be apprehended, than to be rendered uncomfortable by +an ill-founded pride. It is therefore better to carry on an easy and civil +conversation. A snuff-box, or some polite accommodation rendered, may serve for +an opening. Talk only about generalities,—the play, the roads, the +weather. Avoid speaking of persons or politics, for, if the individual is of +the opposite party to yourself, you will be engaged in a controversy: if he +holds the same opinions, you will be overwhelmed with a flood of vulgar +intelligence, which may soil your mind. Be reservedly civil while the colloquy +lasts, and let the acquaintance cease with the occasion. +</p> + +<p> +When you are introduced to a gentleman do not give your hand, but merely bow +with politeness: and if you have requested the introduction, or know the person +by reputation, you may make a speech. I am aware that high authority might +easily be found in this country to sanction the custom of giving the hand upon +a first meeting, but it is undoubtedly a solecism in manners. The habit has +been adopted by us, with some improvement for the worse, from France. When two +Frenchmen are presented to one another, each <i>presses</i> the other’s +hand with delicate affection. The English, however, never do so: and the +practice, if abstractly correct, is altogether inconsistent with the caution of +manner which is characteristic of their nation and our own. If we are to follow +the French, in shaking hands with one whom we have never before seen, we should +certainly imitate them also in kissing our <i>intimate</i> male acquaintances. +If, however, you ought only to bow to a new acquaintance, you surely should do +more to old ones. If you meet an intimate friend fifty times in a morning, give +your hand every time,—an observance of propriety, which, though worthy of +universal adoption, is in this country only followed by the purists in +politeness. The requisitions of etiquette, if they should be obeyed at all, +should be obeyed fully. This decent formality prevents acquaintance from being +too distant, while, at the same time, it preserves the “familiar” +from becoming “vulgar.” They may be little things, but +</p> + +<p> +“These little things are great to little men.” +</p> + +<p> +Goldsmith. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap04"></a>CHAPTER IV.<br /> +THE DRAWING-ROOM. COMPANY. CONVERSATION.</h2> + +<p> +The grand object for which a gentleman exists, is to excel in company. +Conversation is the mean of his distinction,—the drawing-room the scene +of his glory. +</p> + +<p> +When you enter a drawing-room, where there is a ball or a party, you salute the +lady of the house before speaking to any one else. Even your most intimate +friends are enveloped in an opaque atmosphere until you have made your bow to +your entertainer. We must take occasion here to obelize a custom which prevails +too generally in this country. The company enter the back door of the back +parlour, and the mistress of the house is seated at the other extremity of the +front parlour. It is therefore necessary to traverse the length of two rooms in +order to reach her. A voyage of this kind is by no means an easy undertaking, +when there are Circes and Calypsos assailing one on every side; and when one +has reached the conclusion, one cannot perhaps distinguish the object of +one’s search at a <i>coup d’œil.</i> It would be in every point of +view more appropriate if the lady were to stand directly opposite to the door +of the back parlour. Such is the custom in the best companies abroad. Upon a +single gentleman entering at a late hour, it is not so obligatory to speak +first to the mistress of the ceremonies. He may be allowed to converge his way +up to her. When you leave a room before the others, go without speaking to any +one, and, if possible, unseen. +</p> + +<p> +Never permit the sanctity of the drawing-room to be violated by a boot. +</p> + +<p> +Fashionable society is divided into <i>sets</i>, in all of which there is some +peculiarity of manner, or some dominant tone of feeling. It is necessary to +study these peculiarities before entering the circle. +</p> + +<p> +In each of these sets there is generally some <i>gentleman</i>, who rules, and +gives it its character, or, rather, who is not ruler, but the first and most +favoured subject, and the prime minister of the ladies’ will. Him you +must endeavour to imitate, taking care not to imitate him so well as to excel +him. To differ in manner or opinion from him is to render yourself unfit for +that circle. To speak disrespectfully of him is to insult personally every lady +who composes it. +</p> + +<p> +In company, though none are “free,” yet all are +“equal.” All therefore whom you meet, should be treated with equal +respect, although interest may dictate toward each different degrees of +attention. It is disrespectful to the inviter to shun any of her guests. Those +whom she has honoured by asking to her house, you should sanction by admitting +to your acquaintance. +</p> + +<p> +If you meet any one whom you have never heard of before at the table of a +gentleman, or in the drawing-room of a lady, you may converse with him with +entire propriety. The form of “introduction” is nothing more than a +statement by a mutual friend that two gentlemen are by rank and manners fit +acquaintances for one another. All this may be presumed from the fact, that +both meet at a respectable house. This is the theory of the matter. Custom, +however, requires that you should take the earliest opportunity afterwards to +be regularly presented to such an one. +</p> + +<p> +Men of all sorts of occupations meet in society. As they go there to unbend +their minds and escape from the fetters of business, you should never, in an +evening, speak to a man about his professions. Do not talk of politics with a +journalist, of fevers to a physician, of stocks to a broker,—nor, unless +you wish to enrage him to the utmost, of education to a collegian. The error +which is here condemned is often committed from mere good nature and a desire +to be affable. But it betrays to a gentleman, ignorance of the world—to a +philosopher, ignorance of human nature. The one considers that “Tous les +hommes sont égaux devant la politesse:” the other remembers that though +it may be agreeable to be patronised and assisted, yet it is still more +agreeable to be treated as if you needed no patronage, and were above +assistance. +</p> + +<p> +Sir Joshua Reynolds once received from two noblemen invitations to visit them +on Sunday morning. The first, whom he waited upon, welcomed him with the most +obsequious condescension, treated him with all the attention in the world, +professed that he was so desirous of seeing him, that he had mentioned Sunday +as the time for his visit, supposing him to be too much engaged during the +week, to spare time enough for the purpose, concluded his compliments by an +eulogy on painting, and smiled him affectionately to the door. Sir Joshua left +him, to call upon the other. That one received him with respectful civility, +and behaved to him as he would have behaved to an equal in the +peerage:—said nothing about Raphael nor Correggio, but conversed with +ease about literature and men. This nobleman was the Earl of Chesterfield. Sir +Joshua felt, that though the one had said that he respected him, the other had +proved that he did, and went away from this one gratified rather than from the +first. Reader, there is wisdom in this anecdote. Mark, learn, and inwardly +digest it: and let this be the moral which you deduce,—that there is +distinction in society, but that there are no distinctions. +</p> + +<p> +The great business in company is conversation. It should be studied as art. +Style in conversation is as important, and as capable of cultivation as style +in writing. The manner of saying things is what gives them their value. +</p> + +<p> +The most important requisite for succeeding here, is constant and unfaltering +attention. That which Churchill has noted as the greatest virtue on the stage, +is also the most necessary in company,—to be “always attentive to +the business of the scene.” Your understanding should, like your person, +be armed at all points. Never go into society with your mind <i>en +deshabille.</i> It is fatal to success to be all absent or <i>distrait.</i> The +secret of conversation has been said to consist in building upon the remark of +your companion. Men of the strongest minds, who have solitary habits and +bookish dispositions, rarely excel in sprightly colloquy, because they seize +upon the <i>thing</i> itself,—the subject abstractly,—instead of +attending to the <i>language</i> of other speakers, and do not cultivate +<i>verbal</i> pleasantries and refinements. He who does otherwise gains a +reputation for quickness, and pleases by showing that he has regarded the +observation of others. +</p> + +<p> +It is an error to suppose that conversation consists in talking. A more +important thing is to listen discreetly. Mirabeau said, that to succeed in the +world, it is necessary to submit to be taught many things which you understand, +by persons who know nothing about them. Flattery is the smoothest path to +success; and the most refined and gratifying compliment you can pay, is to +listen. “The wit of conversation consists more in finding it in +others,” says La Bruyère, “than in showing a great deal yourself: +he who goes from your conversation pleased with himself and his own wit, is +perfectly well pleased with you. Most men had rather please than admire you, +and seek less to be instructed,—nay, delighted,—than to be approved +and applauded. The most delicate pleasure is to please another.” +</p> + +<p> +It is certainly proper enough to convince others of your merits. But the +highest idea which you can give a man of your own penetration, is to be +thoroughly impressed with his. +</p> + +<p> +Patience is a social engine, as well as a Christian virtue. To listen, to wait, +and to be wearied are the certain elements of good fortune. +</p> + +<p> +If there be any foreigner present at a dinner party, or small evening party, +who does not understand the language which is spoken, good breeding requires +that the conversation should be carried on entirely in his language. Even among +your most intimate friends, never address any one in a language not understood +by all the others. It is as bad as whispering. +</p> + +<p> +Never speak to any one in company about a private affair which is not +understood by others, as asking how <i>that</i> matter is coming on, &c. In +so doing you indicate your opinion that the rest are <i>de trop.</i> If you +wish to make any such inquiries, always explain to others the business about +which you inquire, if the subject admit of it. +</p> + +<p> +If upon the entrance of a visitor you continue a conversation begun before, you +should always explain the subject to the new-comer. +</p> + +<p> +If there is any one in the company whom you do not know, be careful how you let +off any epigrams or pleasant little sarcasms. You might be very witty upon +halters to a man whose father had been hanged. The first requisite for +successful conversation is to know your company well. +</p> + +<p> +We have spoken above of the necessity of relinquishing the prerogative of our +race, and being contented with recipient silence. There is another precept of a +kindred nature to be observed, namely, not to talk too well when you do talk. +You do not raise yourself much in the opinion of another, if at the same time +that you amuse him, you wound him in the nicest point,—his self-love. +Besides irritating vanity, a constant flow of wit is excessively fatiguing to +the listeners. A witty man is an agreeable acquaintance, but a tiresome friend. +“The wit of the company, next to the butt of the company,” says +Mrs. Montagu, “is the meanest person in it. The great duty of +conversation is to follow suit, as you do at whist: if the eldest hand plays +the deuce of diamonds, let not his next neighbour dash down the king of hearts, +because his hand is full of honours. I do not love to see a man of wit win all +the tricks in conversation.” +</p> + +<p> +In addressing any one, always look at him; and if there are several present, +you will please more by directing some portion of your conversation, as an +anecdote or statement, to each one individually in turn. This was the great +secret of Sheridan’s charming manner. His bon-mots were not numerous. +</p> + +<p> +Never ask a question under any circumstances. In the first place it is too +proud; in the second place, it may be very inconvenient or very awkward to give +a reply. A lady lately inquired of what branch of medical practice a certain +gentleman was professor. He held the chair of <i>midwifery</i>! +</p> + +<p> +It is indispensable for conversation to be well acquainted with the current +news and the historical events of the last few years. It is not convenient to +be quite so far behind the rest of the world in such matters, as the Courier +des Etats-Unis. That sapient journal lately announced the dethronement of +Charles X. We may expect soon to hear of the accession of Louis Philippe. +</p> + +<p> +In society never quote. If you get entangled in a dispute with some learned +blockhead, you may silence him with a few extemporary quotations. Select the +author for whom he has the greatest admiration, and give him a passage in the +style of that writer, which most pointedly condemns the opinion he supports. If +it does not convince him, he will be so much stunned with amazement that you +can make your escape, and avoid the unpleasant necessity of knocking him down. +</p> + +<p> +The ordinary weapons which one employs in social encounter, are, whether +dignified or not, always at least honourable. There are some, however, who +habitually prefer to bribe the judge, rather than strengthen their cause. The +instrument of such is flattery. There are, indeed, cases in which a man of +honour may use the same weapon; as there are cases in which a poisoned sword +may be employed for self-defence. +</p> + +<p> +Flattery prevails over all, always, and in all places; it conquers the +conqueror of Danäe: few are beneath it, none above it: the court, the camp, the +church, are the scenes of its victories, and all mankind the subjects of its +triumphs. It will be acknowledged, then, that a man possesses no very +contemptible power who can flatter skillfully. +</p> + +<p> +The power of flattery may be derived from several sources. It may be, that the +person flattered, finding himself gratified, and conscious that it is to the +flatterer that he is indebted for this gratification, feels an obligation to +him, without inquiring the reason; or it may be, that imagining ourselves to +stand high in the good opinion of the one that praises us, We comply with what +he desires, rather than forfeit that esteem: or, finally, flattery may be only +a marked politeness, and we submit ourselves to the control of the flatterer +rather than be guilty of the rudeness of opposing him. +</p> + +<p> +Flattery never should be direct. It should not be stated, but inferred. It is +better acted than uttered. Flattery should seem to be the unwitting and even +unwilling expression of genuine admiration. Some very weak persons do not +require that expressions of praise and esteem toward them should be sincere. +They are pleased with the incense, although they perceive whence it arises: +they are pleased that they are of importance enough to have their favour +courted. But in most eases it is necessary that the flattery should appear to +be the honest offspring of the feelings. <i>Such</i> flattery <i>must</i> +succeed; for, it is founded upon a principle in our nature which is as deep as +life; namely, that we always love those who we think love us. +</p> + +<p> +It is sometimes flattery to accept praises. +</p> + +<p> +Never flatter one person in the presence of another. +</p> + +<p> +Never commend a lady’s musical skill to another lady who herself plays. +</p> + +<p> +It has often, however, a good effect to praise one man to his particular +friend, if it be for something to which that friend has himself no pretensions. +</p> + +<p> +It is an error to imagine that men are less intoxicated with flattery than +women. The only difference is that esteem must be expressed to women, but +proved to men. +</p> + +<p> +Flattery is of course efficacious to obtain positive benefits. It is of, more +constant use, however, for purposes of defence. You conquer an attack of +rudeness by courtesy: you avert an attack of accusation by flattery. Every:one +remembers the anecdote of Dr. Johnson and Mr. Ewing. “Prince,” said +Napoleon to Talleyrand, “they tell me that you sometimes speculate +improperly in the funds.” “They do me wrong then,” said +Talleyrand. “But how did you acquire so much money!” “I +bought stock the day before you were proclaimed First Consul,” replied +the ex-bishop, “and I sold it the day after.” +</p> + +<p> +Compliments are light skirmishes in the war of flattery, for the purpose of +obtaining an occasional object. They are little false coins that you receive +with one hand and pay away with the other. To flatter requires a profound +knowledge of human nature and of the character of your subject; to compliment +skillfully, it is sufficient that you are a pupil of Spurzheim. +</p> + +<p> +It is a common practice with men to abstain from grave conversation with women. +And the habit is in general judicious. If the woman is young, gay and +trifling, talk to her only of the latest fashions, the gossip of the day, etc. +But this in other cases is not to be done. Most women who are a little old, +particularly married women — and even some who are young — wish to +obtain a reputation for intellect and an acquaintance With science. You +therefore pay them a real compliment, and gratify their self-love, by +conversing occasionally upon grave matters, which they do not understand, and +do not really relish. You may interrupt a discussion on the beauty of a dahlia, +by observing that as you know that they take an interest in such things you +mention the discovery of a new method of analyzing curves of double curvature. +Men who talk only of trifles will rarely be popular with women past +twenty-five. +</p> + +<p> +Talk to a mother about her children. Women are never tired of hearing of +themselves and their children. +</p> + +<p> +If you go to a house where there are children you should take especial care to +conciliate their good will by a little manly <i>tete-a-tete</i>, otherwise you +may get a ball against your skins, or be tumbled from a three-legged chair. +</p> + +<p> +To be able to converse with women you must study their vocabulary. You would +make a great mistake in interpreting <i>never, forever</i>, as they are +explained in Johnson. +</p> + +<p> +Do not be for ever telling a woman that she is handsome, witty, etc. She knows +that a vast deal better than you do. +</p> + +<p> +Do not allow your love for one woman to prevent your paying attention to +others. The object of your love is the only one who ought to perceive it. +</p> + +<p> +A little pride, which reminds you what is due to yourself, and a little good +nature, which suggests what is due to others, are the pre-requisites for the +moral constitution of a gentleman. +</p> + +<p> +Too much vivacity and too much inertness are both fatal to politeness. By the +former we are hurried too far, by the latter we are kept too much back. +</p> + +<p> +<i>Nil admirari</i>, the precept of stoicism, is the precept for conduct among +gentlemen. All excitement must be studiously avoided. When you are with ladies +the case is different. Among them, wonder, astonishment, ecstacy, and +enthusiasm, are necessary in order to be believed. +</p> + +<p> +Never dispute in the presence of other persons. If a man states an opinion +which you cannot adopt, say nothing. If he states a fact which is of little +importance, you may carelessly assent. When you differ let it be indirectly; +rather a want of assent than actual dissent. +</p> + +<p> +If you wish to inquire about anything, do not do it by asking a question; but +introduce the subject, and give the person an opportunity of saying as much as +he finds it agreeable to impart. Do not even say, “How is your brother +to-day?” but “I hope your brother is quite well.” +</p> + +<p> +Never ask a lady a question about anything whatever. +</p> + +<p> +It is a point of courtly etiquette which is observed rigorously by every one +who draws nigh, that a question must never be put to a king. +</p> + +<p> +Never ask a question about the price of a thing. This horrible error is often +committed by a <i>nouveau riche.</i> +</p> + +<p> +If you have accepted an invitation to a party never fail to keep your promise. +It is cruel to the lady of the house to accept, and then send an apology at the +last moment. Especially do not break your word on account of bad weather. You +may be certain that many others will, and the inciter will be mortified by the +paucity of her guests. A cloak and a carriage will secure you from all +inconvenience, and you will be conferring a real benefit. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap05"></a>CHAPTER V.<br /> +THE ENTRANCE INTO SOCIETY.</h2> + +<p> +Women, particularly women a little on the decline, are those who make the +reputation of a young man. When the lustre of their distinction begins to fade, +a slight feeling of less wonted leisure, perhaps a little spite, makes them +observe attentively those who surround them. Eager to gain new admirers, they +encourage the first steps of a <i>debutant</i> in the career of society, and +exert themselves to fit him to do honour to their patronage. +</p> + +<p> +A young man, therefore, in entering the world, cannot be too attentive to +conciliate the goodwill of women. Their approbation and support will serve him +instead of a thousand good qualities. Their judgment dispenses with fortune, +talent, and even intelligence. “Les hommes font les lois: les femmes font +les reputations.” +</p> + +<p> +The desire of pleasing is, of course, the basis of social connexion. Persons +who enter society with the intention of producing an effect, and of being +distinguished, however clever they may be, are never agreeable. They are always +tiresome, and often ridiculous. Persons, who enter life with such pretensions, +have no opportunity for improving themselves and profiting by experience. They +are not in a proper state to <i>observe</i>: indeed, they look only for the +effect which they produce, and with that they are not often gratified. They +thrust themselves into all conversations, indulge in continual anecdotes, which +are varied only by dull disquisitions, listen to others with impatience and +heedlessness, and are angry that they seem to be attending to themselves. Such +men go through scenes of pleasure, enjoying nothing. They are equally +disagreeable to themselves and others. Young men should, therefore, content +themselves with being natural. Let them present themselves with a modest +assurance: let them observe, hear, and examine, and before long they will rival +their models. +</p> + +<p> +The conversation of those women who are not the most lavishly supplied with +personal beauty, will be of the most advantage to the young aspirant. Such +persons have cultivated their manners and conversation more than those who can +rely upon their natural endowments. The absence of pride and pretension has +improved their good nature and their affability. They are not too much occupied +in contemplating their own charms, to be disposed to indulge in gentle +criticism on others. One acquires from them an elegance in one’s manners +as well as one’s expressions. Their kindness pardons every error, and to +instruct or reprove, their acts are so delicate that the lesson which they +give, always without offending, is sure to be profitable, though it may be +often unperceived. +</p> + +<p> +Women observe all the delicacies of propriety in manners, and all the shades of +impropriety, much better than men; not only because they attend to them earlier +and longer, but because their perceptions are more refined than those of the +other sex, who are habitually employed about greater things. Women divine, +rather than arrive at, proper conclusions. +</p> + +<p> +The whims and caprices of women in society should of course be tolerated by +men, who themselves require toleration for greater inconveniences. But this +must not be carried too far. There are certain limits to empire which, if they +themselves forget, should be pointed out to them with delicacy and politeness. +You should be the slave of women, but not of all their fancies. +</p> + +<p> +Compliment is the language of intercourse from men to women. But be careful to +avoid elaborate and common-place forms of gallant speech. Do not strive to make +those long eulogies on a woman, which have the regularity and nice dependency +of a proposition in Euclid, and might be fittingly concluded by Q. E. D. Do not +be always undervaluing her rival in a woman’s presence, nor mistaking a +woman’s daughter for her sister. These antiquated and exploded attempts +denote a person who has learned the world more from books than men. +</p> + +<p> +The quality which a young man should most affect in intercourse with gentlemen, +is a decent modesty: but he must avoid all bashfulness or timidity. His flights +must not go too far; but, so far as they go, let them be marked by perfect +assurance. +</p> + +<p> +Among persons who are much your seniors behave with the utmost respectful +deference. As they find themselves sliding out of importance they may be easily +conciliated by a little respect. +</p> + +<p> +By far the most important thing to be attended to, is ease of manner. Grace may +be added afterwards, or be omitted altogether: it is of much less moment than +is commonly believed. Perfect propriety and entire ease are sufficient +qualifications for standing in society, and abundant prerequisites for +distinction. +</p> + +<p> +There is the most delicate shade of difference between civility and +intrusiveness, familiarity and common-place, pleasantry and sharpness, the +natural and the rude, gaiety and carelessness; hence the inconveniences of +society, and the errors of its members. To define well in conduct these +distinctions, is the great art of a man of the world. It is easy to know what +to do; the difficulty is to know what to avoid. +</p> + +<p> +Long usage—a sort of moral magnetism, a tact acquired by frequent and +long associating with others—alone give those qualities which keep one +always from error, and entitle him to the name of a thorough gentleman. +</p> + +<p> +A young man upon first entering into society should select those persons who +are most celebrated for the propriety and elegance of their manners. He should +frequent their company and imitate their conduct. There is a disposition +inherent, in all, which has been noticed by Horace and by Dr. Johnson, to +imitate faults, because they are more readily observed and more easily +followed. There are, also, many foibles of manner and many refinements of +affectation, which sit agreeably upon one man, which if adopted by another +would become unpleasant. There are even some excellences of deportment which +would not suit another whose character is different. For successful imitation +in anything, good sense is indispensable. It is requisite correctly to +appreciate the natural differences between your model and yourself, and to +introduce such modifications in the copy as may be consistent with it. +</p> + +<p> +Let not any man imagine, that he shall easily acquire these qualities which +will constitute him a gentleman. It is necessary not only to exert the highest +degree of art, but to attain also that higher accomplishment of concealing art. +The serene and elevated dignity which mark that character, are the result of +untiring and arduous effort. After the sculpture has attained the shape of +propriety, it remains to smooth off all the marks of the chisel. “A +gentleman,” says a celebrated French author, “is one who has +reflected deeply upon all the obligations which belong to his station, and who +has applied himself ardently to fulfil them with grace.” +</p> + +<p> +Polite without importunity, gallant without being offensive, attentive to the +comfort of all; employing a well-regulated kindness, witty at the proper times, +discreet, indulgent, generous, he exercises, in his sphere, a high degree of +moral authority; he it is, and he alone, that one should imitate. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap06"></a>CHAPTER VI.<br /> +LETTERS.</h2> + +<p> +Always remember that the terms of compliment at the close of a +letter—“I have the honour to be your very obedient servant,” +etc. are merely forms—“signifying nothing.” Do not therefore +avoid them on account of pride, or a dislike to the person addressed. Do not +presume, as some do, to found expectations of favour or promotion from great +men who profess themselves your obliged servant. +</p> + +<p> +In writing a letter of business it is extremely vulgar to use satin or glazed +gold-edged paper. Always employ, on such occasions, plain American paper. Place +the date at the top of the page, and if you please, the name of the person at +the top also, just above the ‘Sir;’ though this last is +indifferent. +</p> + +<p> +In letters to gentlemen always place the date at the end of the letter, below +his name. Use the best paper, but not figured, and never fail to enclose it in +an envelope. Attention to these matters is indispensable. +</p> + +<p> +To a person whom you do not know well, say Sir, not ‘Dear Sir.’ It +formerly was usual in writing to a distinguished man to employ the form +‘Respected Sir,’ or something of the kind. This is now out of +fashion. +</p> + +<p> +There are a great many forms observed by the French in their letters, which are +necessary to be known before addressing one of that nation. You will find them +in their books upon such subjects, or learn them from your French master. One +custom of theirs is worthy of adoption among us: to proportion the distance +between the ‘Sir’ and the first line of the letter, to the rank of +the person to whom you write. Among the French to neglect attending to this +would give mortal offence. It obtains also in other European nations. When the +Duke of Buckingham was at the court of Spain, some letters passed between the +Spanish minister Olivez and himself,—the two proudest men on earth. The +Spaniard wrote a letter to the Englishman, and put the ‘Monsieur’ +on a line with the beginning of his letter. The other, in his reply, placed the +‘Monsieur’ a little below it. +</p> + +<p> +A note of invitation or reply is always to be enclosed in an envelope. +</p> + +<p> +Wafers are now entirely exploded. A letter of business is sealed with red wax, +and marked with some common stamp. Letters to gentlemen demand red wax sealed +with your arms. In notes to ladies employ coloured wax, but not perfumed. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap07"></a>CHAPTER VII.<br /> +VISITS.</h2> + +<p> +Of visits there are various sorts; visits of congratulation, visits of +condolence, visits of ceremony, visits of friendship. To each belong different +customs. +</p> + +<p> +A visit and an insult must be always returned. +</p> + +<p> +Visits of ceremony should be very short. Go at some time when business demands +the employment of every moment. In visits of friendship adopt a different +course. +</p> + +<p> +If you call to see an acquaintance at lodgings, and cannot find any one to +announce you, you knock very lightly at the door, and wait some time before +entering. If you are in too great a hurry, you might find the person drawing +off a night-cap. +</p> + +<p> +Respectable visitors should be received and treated with the utmost courtesy. +But if a tiresome fellow, after wearying all his friends, becomes weary of +himself, and arrives to bestow his tediousness upon you, pull out your watch +with restlessness, talk about your great occupations and the value of time. +Politeness is one thing; to be made a convenience of is another. +</p> + +<p> +The style of your conversation should always be in keeping with the character +of the visit. You must not talk about literature in a visit of condolence, nor +about political economy in a visit of ceremony. +</p> + +<p> +When a lady visits you, upon her retiring, you offer her your arm, and conduct +her to her carriage. If you are visiting at the same time with another lady, +you should take leave at the same time, and hand her into her carriage. +</p> + +<p> +After a hall, a dinner, or a concert, you visit during the week. +</p> + +<p> +Pay the first visit to a friend just returned from a voyage. +</p> + +<p> +Annual visits are paid to persons with whom you have a cool acquaintance, They +visit you in the autumn, you return a card in the spring. +</p> + +<p> +In paying a visit under ordinary circumstances, you leave a single card. If +there be residing in the family, a married daughter, an unmarried sister, a +transient guest, or any person in a distinct situation from the mistress of the +house, you leave two cards, one for each party. If you are acquainted with only +one member of a family, as the husband, or the wife, and you wish to indicate +that your visit is to both, you leave two cards. Ladies have a fashion of +pinching down one corner of a card to denote that the visit is to only one of +two parties in a house, and two corners, or one side of the card, when the +visit is to both; but this is a transient mode, and of dubious respectability. +</p> + +<p> +If, in paying a morning visit, you are not recognized when you enter, mention +your name immediately. If you call to visit one member, and you find others +only in the parlour, introduce yourself to them. Much awkwardness may occur +through defect of attention to this point. +</p> + +<p> +When a gentleman is about to be married, he sends cards, a day or two before +the event, to all whom he is in the habit of visiting. These visits are never +paid in person, but the cards sent by a servant, at any hour in the morning; or +the gentleman goes in a carriage, and sends them in. After marriage, some day +is appointed and made known to all, as the day on which he receives company. +His friends then all call upon him. Would that this also were performed by +cards! +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap08"></a>CHAPTER VIII.<br /> +APPOINTMENTS AND PUNCTUALITY.</h2> + +<p> +When you make an appointment, always be exact in observing it. In some places, +and on some occasions, a quarter of an hour’s <i>grace</i> is given. This +depends on custom, and it is always better not to avail yourself of it. In +Philadelphia it is necessary to be punctual to a second, for there everybody +breathes by the State-house clock If you make an appointment to meet anywhere, +your body must be in a right line with the frame of the door at the instant the +first stroke of the great clock sounds. If you are a moment later, your +character is gone. It is useless to plead the evidence of your watch, or +detention by a friend. You read your condemnation in the action of the old +fellows who, with polite regard to your feelings, simultaneously pull out their +vast chronometers, as you enter. The tardy man is worse off than the murderer. +<i>He</i> may be pardoned by one person, (the Governor); the unpunctual is +pardoned by none. <i>Haud inexpectus loquor.</i> +</p> + +<p> +If you make an appointment with another at your own house, you should be +invisible to the rest of the world, and consecrate your time solely to him. +</p> + +<p> +If you make an appointment with a lady, especially if it be upon a promenade, +or other public place, you must be there a little before the time. +</p> + +<p> +If you accept an appointment at the house of a public officer, or a man of +business, be very punctual, transact the affair with despatch, and retire the +moment it is finished. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap09"></a>CHAPTER IX.<br /> +DINNER.</h2> + +<p> +The hour of dinner has been said, by Dr. Johnson, to be the most important hour +in civilized life. The etiquette of the dinner-table has a prominence +commensurate with the dignity of the ceremony. Like the historian of Peter +Bell, we commence at the commencement, and thence proceed to the moment when +you take leave officially, or vanish unseen. +</p> + +<p> +In order to dine, the first requisite is—to be invited. The length of +time which the invitation precedes the dinner is always proportioned to the +grandeur of the occasion, and varies from two days to two weeks. To an +invitation received less than two days in advance, you will lose little by +replying in the negative, for as it was probably sent as soon as the +preparations of the host commenced, you may be sure that there will be little +on the table fit to eat. Those abominations, y’clept “plain family +dinners,” eschew like the plague. +</p> + +<p> +You reply to a note of invitation immediately, and in the most direct and +unequivocal terms. If you accept, you arrive at the house rigorously at the +hour specified. It is equally inconvenient to be too late and to be too early. +If you fall into the latter error, you find every thing in disorder; the master +of the house is in his dressing-room, changing his waistcoat; the lady is still +in the pantry; the fire not yet lighted in the parlour. If by accident or +thoughtlessness you arrive too soon, you may pretend that you called to inquire +the exact hour at which they dine, having mislaid the note, and then retire to +walk for an appetite. If you are too late, the evil is still greater, and +indeed almost without a remedy. Your delay spoils the dinner and destroys the +appetite and temper of the guests; and you yourself are so much embarrassed at +the inconvenience you have occasioned, that you commit a thousand errors at +table. If you do not reach the house until dinner is served, you had better +retire to a restaurateurs, and thence send an apology, and not interrupt the +harmony of the courses by awkward excuses and cold acceptances. +</p> + +<p> +When the guests have all entered, and been presented to one another, if any +delay occurs, the conversation should be of the lightest and least exciting +kind; mere common-places about the weather and late arrivals. You should not +amuse the company by animated relations of one person who has just cut his +throat from ear to ear, or of another who, the evening before, was choked by a +tough beef-steak and was buried that morning. +</p> + +<p> +When dinner is announced, the inviter rises and requests all to walk to the +dining-room. He then leads the way, that they may not be at a loss to know +whither they should proceed. Each gentleman offers his arm to a lady, and they +follow in solemn order. +</p> + +<p> +The great distinction now becomes evident between the host and the guests, +which distinction it is the chief effort of good breeding to remove. To perform +faultlessly the honours of the table, is one of the most difficult things in +society: it might indeed be asserted without much fear of contradiction, that +no man has as yet ever reached exact propriety in his office as host, has hit +the mean between exerting himself too much and too little. His great business +is to put every one entirely at his ease, to gratify all his desires, and make +him, in a word, absolutely contented with men and things. To accomplish this, +he must have the genius of tact to perceive, and the genius of finesse to +execute; ease and frankness of manner; a knowledge of the world that nothing +can surprise; a calmness of temper that nothing can disturb, and a kindness of +disposition that can never be exhausted. When he receives others, he must be +content to forget himself; he must relinquish all desire to shine, and even all +attempts to please his guests by conversation, and rather, do all in his power +to let them please one another. He behaves to them without agitation, without +affectation; he pays attention without an air of protection; he encourages the +timid, draws out the silent, and directs conversation without Sustaining it +himself. He who does not do all this, is wanting in his duty as host; he who +does, is more than mortal. +</p> + +<p> +When all are seated, the gentleman at the head of the table sends soup to every +one, from the pile of plates which stand at his right hand. He helps the person +at his right hand first, and at his left next, and so through the whole. +</p> + +<p> +There are an immensity of petty usages at the dinner table, such as those +mentioned in the story of the Abbé Delille and the Abbé Cosson in the +Introduction to this volume, which it would be trifling and tedious to +enumerate hers, and which will be learned by an observing man after assisting +at two or three dinners. +</p> + +<p> +You should never ask a gentleman or lady at the table to help you to any thing, +but always apply to the servants. +</p> + +<p> +Your first duty at the table is to attend to the wants of the lady who sits +next to you, the second, to attend to your own. In performing the first, you +should take care that the lady has all that she wishes, yet without appearing +to direct your attention too much to her plate, for nothing is more ill-bred +than to watch a person eating. If the lady be something of a <i>gourmande</i>, +and in ever-zealous pursuit of the aroma of the wing of a pigeon, should raise +an unmanageable portion to her mouth, you should cease all conversation with +her, and look steadfastly into the opposite part of the room. +</p> + +<p> +In France, a dish, after having been placed upon the table for approval, is +removed by the servants, and carved at a sideboard, and after. wards handed to +each in succession. This is extremely convenient, and worthy of acceptation in +this country. But unfortunately it does not as yet prevail here. Carving +therefore becomes an indispensable branch of a gentleman’s education. You +should no more think of going to a dinner without a knowledge of this art, than +you should think of going without your shoes. The gentleman of the house +selects the various dishes in the order in which they should be cut, and +invites some particular one to perform the office. It is excessively awkward to +be obliged to decline, yet it is a thing too often occurring in,his country. +When you carve, you should never rise from your seat. +</p> + +<p> +Some persons, in helping their guests, or recommending dishes to their taste, +preface every such action with an eulogy on its merits, and draw every bottle +of wine with an account of its virtues. Others, running into the contrary +extreme, regret or fear that each dish is not exactly as it should be; that the +cook, etc., etc. Both of these habits are grievous errors. You should leave it +to your guests alone to approve, or suffer one of your intimate friends who is +present, to vaunt your wine. When you draw a bottle, merely state its age and +brand, and of what particular vintage it is. +</p> + +<p> +Do not insist upon your guests partaking of particular dishes, never ask +persons more than once, and never put anything by force upon their plates. It +is extremely ill-bred, though extremely common, to press one to eat of +anything. You should do all that you can to make your guests feel themselves at +home, which they never can do while you are so constantly forcing upon their +minds the recollection of the difference between yourself and them. You should +never send away your own plate until all your guests have finished. +</p> + +<p> +Before the cloth is removed you do not drink wine unless with another. If you +are asked to take wine it is uncivil to refuse. When you drink with another, +you catch the person’s eye and bow with politeness. It is not necessary +to say anything, but smile with an air of great kindness. +</p> + +<p> +Some one who sits near the lady of the house, should, immediately upon the +removal of the soup, request the honor of drinking wine with her, which +movement is the signal for all the others. If this is not done, the master of +the house should select some lady. <i>He</i> never asks gentlemen, but they ask +him; this is a refined custom, attended to in the best company. +</p> + +<p> +If you have drunk with every one at the table, and wish more wine, you must +wait till the cloth is removed. The decanter is then sent round from the head +of the table, each person fills his glass, and all the company drinks the +Health of all the company. It is enough if you bow to the master and mistress +of the house, and to your opposite neighbour. After this the ladies retire. +Some one rises to open the door for them, and they go into the parlour, the +gentlemen remaining to drink more wine. +</p> + +<p> +After the ladies have retired, the service of the decanters is done. The host +draws the bottles which have been standing in a wine cooler since the +commencement of the dinner. The bottle goes down the left side and up the +right, and the same bottle never passes twice. If you do not drink, always pass +the bottle to your neighbour. +</p> + +<p> +At dinner never call for ale or porter; it is coarse, and injures the taste for +wine. +</p> + +<p> +It was formerly the custom to drink <i>porter</i> with cheese. One of the few +real improvements introduced by the “Napoleon of the realms of +fashion” was to banish this tavern liquor and substitute <i>port.</i> The +dictum of Brummell was thus enunciated: “A gentleman never <i>malts</i>, +he <i>ports.</i>” +</p> + +<p> +A gentleman should always express his preference for some one sort of wine over +others; because, as there is always a natural preference for one kind, if you +say that you are indifferent, you show that you are not accustomed to drink +wines. Your preference should not of course be guided by your real disposition; +if you are afflicted by nature with a partiality for port, you should never +think of indulging it except in your closet with your chamber-door locked. The +only index of choice is fashion;—either permanent fashion (if the phrase +may be used), or some temporary fashion created by the custom of any individual +who happens to rule for a season in society. Port was drunk by our ancestors, +but George the Fourth, upon his accession to the regency, announced his royal +preference for sherry. It has since been fashionable to like sherry. This is +what we call a <i>permanent</i> fashion. +</p> + +<p> +Champagne wine is drunk after the removal of the first cloth; that is to say, +between the meats and the dessert. One servant goes round and places before +each guest a proper-shaped glass; another follows and fills them, and they are +immediately drunk. Sometimes this is done twice in succession. The bottle does +not again make its appearance, and it would excite a stare to ask at a later +period for a glass of champagne wine. +</p> + +<p> +If you should happen to be blessed with those rely nuisances, children, and +should be entertaining company, never allow them to be brought in after dinner, +unless they are particularly asked for, and even then it is better to say they +are at school. Some persons, with the intention of paying their court to the +father, express great desire to see the sons; but they should have some mercy +upon the rest of the party, particularly as they know that they themselves +would be the most disturbed of all, if their urgent entreaty was granted. +</p> + +<p> +Never at any time, whether at a formal or a familiar dinner party, commit the +impropriety of talking to a servant: nor ever address any remark about one of +them to one of the party. Nothing can be more ill-bred. You merely ask for what +you want in a grave and civil tone, and wait with patience till your order is +obeyed. +</p> + +<p> +It is a piece of refined coarseness to employ the fingers instead of the fork +to effect certain operations at the dinner table, and on some other similar +occasions. To know how and when to follow the fashion of Eden, and when that of +more civilized life, is one of the many points which distinguish a gentleman +from one not a gentleman; or rather, in this case, which shows the difference +between a man of the world, and one who has not “the tune of the +time.”* Cardinal Richelieu detected an adventurer who passed himself off +for a nobleman, by his helping himself to olives with a fork. He might have +applied the test to a vast many other things. Yet, on the other hand, a +gentleman would lose his reputation, if he were to take up a piece of sugar +with his fingers and not with the sugar-tongs. +</p> + +<p class="footnote"> +* Shakspeare +</p> + +<p> +It is of course needless to say that your own knife should never be brought +near to the butter, or salt, or to a dish of any kind. If, however, a gentleman +should send his plate for anything near you, and a knife cannot be obtained +immediately, you may skillfully avoid all censure by using <i>his</i> knife to +procure it. +</p> + +<p> +When you send your plate for anything, you leave your knife and fork upon it, +crossed. When you have done, you lay both in parallel lines on one side. A +render who occupies himself about greater matters, may smile at this precept. +It may, indeed, be very absurd, yet such is the tyranny of custom, that if you +were to cross your knife and fork when you have finished, the most reasonable +and strong-minded man at the table could not help setting you down, in his own +mind, as a low-bred person. <i>Magis sequor quam probo.</i> +</p> + +<p> +The chief matter of consideration at the dinner table, as indeed everywhere +else in the life of a gentleman, is to be perfectly composed and at his ease. +He speaks deliberately, he performs the most important act of the day as if he +were performing the most ordinary. Yet there is no appearance of trifling or +want of gravity in his manner; he maintains the dignity which is becoming on so +vital an occasion. He performs all the ceremonies, yet in the style of one who +performs no <i>ceremony</i> at all. He goes through all the complicated duties +of the scene, as if he were “to the manner born.” +</p> + +<p> +Some persons, who cannot draw the nice distinction between too much and too +little, desiring to be particularly respectable, make a point of appearing +unconcerned and quite indifferent to enjoyment at dinner. Such conduct not only +exhibits a want of sense and a profane levity, but is in the highest degree +rude to your obliging host. He has taken a great deal of trouble to give you +pleasure, and it is your business to be, or at least to appear, pleased. It is +one thing, indeed, to stare and wonder, and to ask for all the delicacies on +the table in the style of a person who had lived all his life behind a counter, +but it is quite another to throw into your manner the spirit and gratified air +of a man who is indeed not unused to such matters, but who yet esteems them at +their fall value. +</p> + +<p> +When the Duke of Wellington was at Paris, as commander of the allied armies, he +was invited to dine with Cambaceres, one of the most distinguished statesmen +and <i>gourmands</i> of the time of Napoleon. In the course of the dinner, his +host having helped him to some particularly <i>recherché</i> dish, expressed a +hope that he found it agreeable. “Very good,” said the hero of +Waterloo, who was probably speculating upon what he would have done if Blucher +had not come up: “Very good; but I really do not care what I eat.” +“Good God!” exclaimed Cambaceres,—as he started back and +dropped his fork, quite “frighted from his +propriety,”—“Don’t care what you eat! What <i>did</i> +you come here for, then?” +</p> + +<p> +After the wine is finished, you retire to the drawing-room, where the ladies +are assembled; the master of the house rising first from the table, but going +out of the room last. If you wish to go before this, you must vanish unseen. +</p> + +<p> +We conclude this chapter by a word of important counsel to the +host:—Never make an apology. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap10"></a>CHAPTER X.<br /> +TRAVELLING.</h2> + +<p> +It is an extremely difficult affair to travel in a coach, with perfect +propriety. Ten to one the person next to you is an English nobleman +<i>incognito</i>; and a hundred to one, the man opposite to you is a brute or a +knave. To behave so that you may not be uncivil to the one, nor a dupe to the +other, is an art of some niceness. +</p> + +<p> +As the seats are assigned to passengers in the order in which they are booked, +you should send to have your place taken a day or two before the journey, so +that you may be certain of a back seat. It is also advisable to arrive at the +place of departure early, so that you assume your place without dispute. +</p> + +<p> +When women appear at the door of the coach to obtain admittance, it is a matter +of some question to know exactly what conduct it is necessary to pursue. If the +women are servants, or persons in a low rank of life, I do not see upon what +ground of politeness or decency you are called upon to yield your seat. +<i>Etiquette</i>, and the deference due to ladies have, of course, no operation +in the case of such persons. Chivalry—(and the gentleman is the +legitimate descendant of the knight of old)—was ever a devotion to rank +rather than to sex. Don Quixotte, or Sir Piercy Shafestone would not willingly +have given place to servant girls. And upon considerations of humanity and +regard to weakness, the case is no stronger. Such people have nerves +considerably more robust than you have, and are quite as capable of riding +backwards, or the top, as yourself. The only reason for <i>politeness</i> in +the case is, that perhaps the other passengers are of the same standing with +the women, and might eject you from the window if you refuse to give place. +</p> + +<p> +If <i>ladies</i> enter—and a gentleman distinguishes them in an +instant—the case is altered. The sooner you move the better is it for +yourself, since the rest will in the end have to concede, and you will give +yourself a reputation among the party and secure a better seat, by rising at +once. +</p> + +<p> +The principle that guides you in society is politeness; that which guides you +in a coach is good humour. You lay aside all attention to form, and all strife +after effect, and take instead, kindness of disposition and a willingness to +please. You pay a constant regard to the comfort of your. fellow-prisoners. +You take care not to lean upon the shoulder of your neighbour when you sleep. +You are attentive not to make the stage wait for you at the stopping-places. +When the ladies get out, you offer them your arm, and you do the same when the +coachman is driving rapidly over a rough place. You should make all the +accommodations to others, which you can do consistently with your own +convenience; for, after all, the individuals are each like little nations; and +as, in the one case, the first duty is to your country, so in the other, the +first duty is to yourself. +</p> + +<p> +Some surly creatures, upon entering a coach, wrap about their persons a great +coat of cloth, and about their minds a mantle of silence, which are not thrown +off during the whole journey. This is doing more harm to themselves than to +others. You should make a point of conversing with an appearance of entire +freedom, though with real reserve, with all those who are so disposed. +</p> + +<p> +One purpose and pleasure of travelling is to gain information, and to observe +the various characters of persons. You will be asked by others about the road +you passed over, and it will be awkward if you can give no account of it. +Converse, therefore, with all. Relate amusing stories, chiefly of other +countries, and even of other times, so as not to offend any one. If engaged in +discussion—and a coach is almost the only place where discussion should +<i>not</i> be avoided—state facts and arguments rather than opinions. +Never answer impudent questions-and never ask them. +</p> + +<p> +At the meals which occur during a journey, you see beautiful exemplification of +the <i>dictum</i> of Hobbes, “that war is the natural state of +man.” The entire scene is one of unintermitted war of every person with +every other person, with the viands, and with good manners. You open your mouth +only to admit edibles and to bellow to the waiters. Your sole object is +yourself. You drink wine without asking your neighbour to join you; and if he +should be so silly as to ask you to hand him some specified dish, you blandly +comply; but in the passage to him, you transfer the whole of its contents to +your own plate. There is no halving in these matters. Rapacity, roaring, and +rapidity are the three requisites for dining during a journey. When you have +resumed your seat in the coach, you are as bland as a morning in spring. +</p> + +<p> +Never assume any unreal importance in a stage-coach, founded on the ignorance +of your fellows, and their inability to detect it. It is excessively absurd, +and can only gratify a momentary and foolish vanity; for, whenever you might +make use of your importance, you would probably be at once discovered. There is +an admirable paper upon this point in one of Johnson’s Adventurers. +</p> + +<p> +The friendship which has subsisted between travellers terminates with the +journey. When you get out, a word, a bow, and the most unpleasant act of life +is finished and forgotten. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap11"></a>CHAPTER XI.<br /> +BALLS.</h2> + +<p> +Invitations to a ball should be issued at least ten days in advance, in order +to give an opportunity to the men to clear away engagements; and to women, time +to prepare the artillery of their toilet. Cards of invitation should be +sent—not notes. +</p> + +<p> +Upon the entrance of ladies, or persons entitled to deference, the master of +the house precedes them across the room: he addresses compliments to them, and +will lose his life to procure them seats. +</p> + +<p> +While dancing with a lady whom you have never seen before, you should not talk +to her much. +</p> + +<p> +The master of the ceremonies must take care that every lady dances, and press +into service for that purpose these young gentlemen who are hanging round the +room like fossils. If desired by him to dance with a particular lady you should +refuse on no account. +</p> + +<p> +If you have no ear, that is, a false one, never dance. +</p> + +<p> +To usurp the seat of a person who is dancing is the height of incivility. +</p> + +<p> +Never go to a public ball. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap12"></a>CHAPTER XII.<br /> +FUNERALS.</h2> + +<p> +When any member of a family is dead, it is customary to send intelligence of +the misfortune to all who have been connected with the deceased in relations of +business or friendship. The letters which are sent contain a special invitation +to assist at the funeral. +</p> + +<p> +An invitation of this sort should never be refused, though, of course, you do +not send a reply, for no other reason that I know of, excepting the +impossibility of framing any formula of acceptance. +</p> + +<p> +You render yourself at the house an hour or two after the time specified. If +you were to sit long in the mournful circle you might be rendered unfit for +doing any thing for a week. +</p> + +<p> +Your dress is black, and during the time of waiting you compose your visage +into a “tristful ’haviour,” and lean in silent solemnity upon +the top of your cane, thinking about— last night’s party. This is a +necessary hypocrisy, and assists marvellously the sadness of the ceremony. You +walk in a procession with the others, your carriage following in the street. +The first places are yielded to the relations of the deceased. +</p> + +<p> +The coffins of persons of distinction are carried in the hands of bearers, who +walk with their hats off. +</p> + +<p> +You walk with another, in seemly order, and converse in a low tone; first upon +the property of the defunct, and next upon the politics of the day. You walk +with the others into the church, where service is said over the body. It is +optional to go to the grave or not. When you go away, you enter your carriage +and return to your business or your pleasures. +</p> + +<p> +A funeral in the morning, a ball in the evening,—“so runs the world +away.” +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap13"></a>CHAPTER XIII.<br /> +SERVANTS.</h2> + +<p> +Servants are a necessary evil. He who shall contrive to obviate their +necessity, or remove their inconveniences, will render to human comfort a +greater benefit than has yet been conferred by all the useful-knowledge +societies of the age. They are domestic spies, who continually embarrass the +intercourse of the members of a family, or possess themselves of private +information that renders their presence hateful, and their absence dangerous. +It is a rare thing to see persons who are not controlled by their servants. +Theirs, too, is not the only kitchen cabinet which begins by serving and ends +by ruling. +</p> + +<p> +If we judge from the frequency and inconvenience of an opposite course, we +should say that the most important precept to be observed is, never to be +afraid of your servants. We have known many ladies who, without any reason in +the world, lived in a state of perfect subjugation to their servants, who were +afraid to give a direction, and who submitted to disobedience and insult, where +no danger could be apprehended from discharging them. +</p> + +<p> +If a servant offends you by any trifling or occasional omission of duty, +reprove the fault with mild severity; if the error be repeated often, and be of +a gross description, never hesitate, but discharge the servant instantly, +without any altercation of language. You cannot easily find another who will +serve you worse. +</p> + +<p> +As for those precautions which are ordinarily taken, to secure the procurence +of good servants, they are, without exception, utterly useless. The author of +the Rambler has remarked, that a written <i>character</i> of a servant is worth +about as much as a discharge from the Old Bailey. I never, but once, took any +trouble to inquire what reputation a servant had held in former situations. On +that occasion, I heard that I had engaged the very Shakespeare of +menials,— Aristides was not more honest,—Zeno more +truth-telling,—nor Abdiel more faithful. This fellow, after insulting me +daily for a week, disappeared with my watch and three pair of boots. +</p> + +<p> +Those offices which profess to recommend good domestics, are +“bosh,—nothing.” In nine cases out of ten, the keepers are in +league with the servants; and in the tenth, ignorance, dishonesty, or +carelessness will prevent any benefit resulting from,their +“intelligence.” All that you can do is, to take the most decent +creature who applies; trust in Providence, and lock every thing up. +</p> + +<p> +Never speak harshly, or superciliously, or hastily to a servant. There are many +little actions which distinguish, to the eye of the most careless observer, a +gentleman from one not a gentleman; but there is none more striking than the +manner of addressing a servant. Issue your commands with gravity and +gentleness, and in a reserved manner. Let your voice be composed, but avoid a +tone of familiarity or sympathy with them. It is better in addressing them to +use a higher key of voice, and not to suffer it to fall at the end of a +sentence. The best bred man whom we ever had the pleasure of meeting, always +employed, in addressing servants, such forms of speech as +these—“I’ll thank you for so and so,”—“Such +a thing, if you please,”—with a gentle tone, but very elevated key. +The perfection of manner, in this particular, is, to indicate by your language, +that the performance is a favour, and by your tone that it is a matter of +course. +</p> + +<p> +While, however, you practise the utmost mildness and forbearance in your +language, avoid the dangerous and common error of exercising too great humanity +in action. No servant, from the time of the first Gibeonite downwards, has ever +had too much labour imposed upon him; while thousands have been ruined by the +mistaken kindness of their masters. +</p> + +<p> +Servants should always be allowed, and indeed directed, to go to church on +Sunday afternoon. For this purpose, dinner is served earlier on that day than +usual. If it can be accomplished, the servants should be induced to attend the +same church as the family with whom they live; because there may be reason to +fear that if they profess to go elsewhere, they may not go to church at all; +and the habit of wandering about the streets with idlers, will speedily ruin +the best servant that ever stood behind a chair. +</p> + +<p> +Servants should be directed to announce visitors. This is always done abroad, +and is a convenient custom. +</p> + +<p> +Never allow a female servant to enter a parlour. If all the male domestics are +gone out, it is better that there should be no attendance at all. +</p> + +<p> +Some ladies are in the habit of amusing their friends with accounts of the +difficulty of getting good servants, etc. This denotes decided ill breeding. +Such subjects should never be made topics of conversation. +</p> + +<p> +If a servant offends you by any grossness of conduct, never rebuke the offence +upon the spot, nor indeed notice it at all at the time; for you cannot do it +without anger, and without giving rise to a <i>scene.</i> Prince Puckler Muskaw +was, very properly, turned out of the Travellers’ Club for throwing a +fork at one of the waiters. +</p> + +<p> +In the house of another, or when there is any company present in your own, +never converse with the servants. This most vulgar, but not uncommon, habit, is +judiciously censured in that best of novels,—the Zeluco of Dr. Moore. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap14"></a>CHAPTER XIV.<br /> +FASHION.</h2> + +<p> +Fashion is a tyranny founded only on assumption. The principle upon which its +influence rests, is one deeply based in the human heart, and one which has long +been observed and long practised upon in every department of life. In the +literary, the religious, and the political world, it has been an assured and +very profitable conclusion, that the public, +</p> + +<p class="poem"> +“Like women, born to be controlled,<br /> +Stoops to the forward and the bold.” +</p> + +<p> +“Qui sibi fidit, dux regit examen,” is a maxim of universal truth. +Pococurante, in Candide, was admired for despising Homer and Michel Angelo; he +would have gained little distinction by praising them. The judicious +application of this rule to society, is the origin of fashion. In despair of +attaining greatness of quality, it founds its distinction only on peculiarity. +</p> + +<p> +We have spoken elsewhere of those complex and very rare accomplishments, whose +union is requisite to constitute a gentleman. We know of but one quality which +is demanded for a man of fashion,—impudence. An impudence +(self-confidence “the wise it call”) as impenetrable as the gates +of Pandemonium—a coolness and imperturbability of self-admiration, which +the boaster in Spencer might envy—a contempt of every decency, as such, +and an utter imperviousness to ridicule,—these are the amiable and +dignified qualities which serve to rear an empire over the weakness and +cowardice of men. +</p> + +<p> +To define the character of that which is changing even while we survey it, is a +task of no small difficulty. We imagine that there is only one means by which +it may be always described, viz., that it consists in an entire avoidance of +all that is natural and rational. Its essence is affectation; effeminacy takes +the place of manliness; drawling stupidity, of wit; stiffness and hauteur, of +ease and civility; and self-illustration, of a decent and respectful regard to +others. +</p> + +<p> +A man of fashion must never allow himself to be pleased. Nothing is more +decidedly <i>de mauvais ton</i> than any expression of delight. He must never +laugh, nor, unless his penetration is very great, must he even smile; for he +might by ignorance smile at the wrong place or time. All real emotion is to be +avoided; all sympathy with the great or the beautiful is to be shunned; yet the +liveliest feeling may be exhibited upon the death of a poodle-dog. +</p> + +<p> +At the house of an acquaintance, he must never praise, nor even look, at the +pictures, the carpets, the curtains, or the ottomans, because if he did, it +might be supposed that he was not accustomed to such things. +</p> + +<p> +About two years ago, it began to be considered improper to pay compliments to +women, because if they are not paid gracefully they are awkward, and to pay +them gracefully is difficult. At the present time it is considered dangerous to +a man’s pretensions to fashion, in England, to speak to women at all. +Women are voted bores, and are to be treated with refined rudeness. +</p> + +<p> +There is no possible system of manners that will serve to exhibit at once the +uncivility and the high refinement which should characterize the man of +fashion. He must therefore have no manners at all. He must behave with tame and +passive insolence, never breaking into active effrontery excepting towards +unprotected women and clergymen. Persons of no importance he does not see, and +is not conscious of their existence; those who have the same standing, he +treats with easy scorn, and he acknowledges the distinction of superiors only +by patronizing and protecting them. A man of fashion does not despise wealth; +he cannot but think <i>that</i> valuable which procures to others the honour of +paying for his suppers. +</p> + +<p> +Fashion is so completely distinguished from good breeding, that it is even +opposed to it. It is in fact a system of refined vulgarity. What, for example +can be more vulgar than incessantly <i>talking</i> about forms and customs? +About silver forks and French soup? A gentleman follows these conventional +habits; but he follows them as matters of course. He looks upon them as the +ordinary and essential customs of refined society. French forks are to him +things as indispensable as a table-cloth; and he thinks it as unnecessary to +insist upon the one as upon the other. If he sees a person who eats with his +knife, he concludes that that person is ignorant of the usages of the world, +but he does not shriek and faint away like a Bond-street dandy. If he dines at +a table where there are no silver forks, he eats his dinner in perfect +propriety with steel, and exhibits, neither by manner nor by speech, that he +perceives any error. To be sure, he forms his own opinion about the rank of his +entertainer, but he leaves it to such new-made gentry as Mr. Theodore Hook, in +his vulgar fashionable novels, to harangue about such delinquencies. The +vulgarity of insisting upon these matters is scarcely less offensive than the +vulgarity of neglecting them. Lady Frances Pelham is but one remove better than +a Brancton. +</p> + +<p> +A man of fashion never goes to the theatre; he is waiting for the opera. +</p> + +<p> +He, of course, goes out of town in the summer; or, if he cannot afford to do +so, he merely closes his window-shutters, and appears to be gone. +</p> + +<p> +Fashion makes all great things little, and all little things great. +</p> + +<p> +It is commonly said, that it requires more wit to perform the part of the fool +in a farce than that of the master. Without intending any offence to the fool +by the comparison, we may remark, that qualities of an elevated character are +required for the support of the <i>role</i> of a man of fashion in the solemn +farce of life. He must have invention, to vary his absurdities when they cease +to be striking; he must have wit enough to obtain the reputation of a great +deal more; and he must possess tact to know when and where to crouch, and where +and when to insult. +</p> + +<p> +Brummel, whose career is one of the most extraordinary on record, must have +exercised, during the period of his social reign, many qualities of conduct +which rank among the highest endowments of our race. For an obscure individual, +without fortune or rank, to have conceived the idea of placing himself at the +head of society in a country the most thoroughly aristocratic in Europe, +relying too upon no other weapon than well-directed insolence; for the same +individual to have triumphed splendidly over the highest and the +mightiest—to have maintained a contest with royalty itself, and to have +come off victorious even in that struggle—for such an one no ordinary +faculties must have been demanded. Of the sayings of Brummel which have been +preserved, it is difficult to distinguish whether they contain real wit, or are +only so sublimely and so absurdly impudent that they look like witty. +</p> + +<p> +We add here a few anecdotes of Brummel, which will serve to show, better than +any precepts, the style of conduct which a man of fashion may pursue. +</p> + +<p> +When Brummel was at the height of his power, he was once, in the company of +some gentlemen, speaking of the Prince of Wales as a very good sort of man, who +behaved himself very decently, <i>considering circumstances</i>; some one +present offered a wager that he would not dare to give a direction to this very +good sort of man. Brummel looked astonished at the remark, and declined +accepting a wager upon such point. They happened to be dining with the regent +the next day, and after being pretty well fortified. with wine, Brummel +interrupted a remark of the prince’s, by exclaiming very mildly and +naturally, “Wales, ring the bell!” His royal highness immediately +obeyed the command, and when the servant entered, said to him, with the utmost +coolness and firmness, “Show Mr. Brummel to his carriage.” The +dandy was not in the least dejected by his expulsion; but meeting the prince +regent, walking with a gentleman, the next day in the street, he did not bow to +him, but stopping the other, drew him aside and said, in a loud whisper, +“Who is that FAT FRIEND of ours?” It must be remembered that the +object of this sarcasm was at that time exceedingly annoyed by his increasing +corpulency; so manifestly so, that Sheridan remarked, that “though the +regent professed himself a Whig, he believed that in his heart he was no friend +to <i>new measures.</i>” +</p> + +<p> +Shortly after this occurrence at Carlton-House, Brummel remarked to one of his +friends, that “he had half a mind to cut the young one, and bring old +George into fashion.” +</p> + +<p> +In describing a short visit which he had paid to a nobleman in the country, he +said, that he had only carried with him a night-cap and a silver basin to spit +in, “Because, you know, it is utterly impossible to spit in clay.” +</p> + +<p> +Brummel was once present at a party to which he had not been invited. After he +had been some time in the room, the gentleman of the house, willing to mortify +him, went up to him and said that he believed that there must be some mistake, +as he did not recollect having had the honour of sending him an invitation. +“What is the name?” said the other very drawlingly, at the same +time affecting to feel in his waistcoat pocket for a card. +“Johnson,” replied the gentleman. “Jauhnson?” said +Brummel, “oh! I remember now that the name was Thaunson (Thompson); and +Jauhnson and Thaunson, Thaunson and Jauhnson, you know, are so much the same +kind of thing.” +</p> + +<p> +Brummel was once asked how much a year he thought would be required to keep a +single man in clothes. “Why, with tolerable economy,” said he, +“I think it might be done for £800.” +</p> + +<p> +He once went down to a gentleman’s house in the country, without having +been asked to do so. He was given to understand, the next morning, that his +absence would be more agreeable, and he took his departure. Some one having +heard of his discomfiture, asked him how he liked the accommodations there. He +replied coolly, that “it was a very decent house to spend a single night +in.” +</p> + +<p> +We have mentioned that this dreaded arbiter of modes had threatened that he +would put the prince regent out of fashion. Alas! for the peace of the British +monarch, this was not an idle boast. His dangerous rival resolved in the +unfathomable recesses of a mind capacious of such things, to commence and to +carry on a war whose terror and grandeur should astound society, to administer +to audacious royalty a lesson which should never be forgotten, and finally to +retire, when retire he must, with mementos of his tremendous power around him, +and with the mightiest of the earth at his feet. Inventive and deliberate were +the counsels which he meditated; sublime and resolute was the conduct he +adopted. He decided, with an originality of genius to which the conqueror of +Marengo might have vailed, that the <i>neck</i> of the foe was the point at +which the first fatal shaft of his excommunicating ire should be hurled. With +rapid and decisive energy he concentrated all his powers for instantaneous +action. He retired for a day to the seclusion of solitude, to summon and to +spur the energies of the most self-reliant mind in Europe, as the lion draws +back to gather courage for the leap. As, like the lion, he drew back; so, like +the lion, did he spring forward upon his prey. At a ball given by the Duchess +of Devonshire, when the whole assembly were conversing upon his supposed +disgrace, and insulting by their malevolence one whom they had disgusted by +their adulation, Brummel suddenly stood in the midst of them. Could it be +indeed Brummel? Could it be mortal who thus appeared with such an encincture of +radiant glory about his neck? Every eye was upon him, fixed in stupid +admiration; every tongue, as it slowly recovered from its speechless paralysis, +faltered forth “what a cravat!” What a cravat indeed! Hundreds that +had, a moment before, exulted in unwonted freedom, bowed before it with the +homage of servile adoration. What a cravat! There it stood; there was no +doubting its entity, no believing it an illusion. There it stood, smooth and +stiff, yet light and almost transparent; delicate as the music of Ariel, yet +firm as the spirit of Regulus; bending with the grace of Apollo’s locks, +yet erect with the majesty of the Olympian Jove: without a wrinkle, without an +indentation. What a cravat! The regent “saw and shook;” and +uttering a faint gurgle from beneath the wadded bag which surrounded his royal +thorax, he was heard to whisper with dismay, “D—n him! what a +cravat!” The triumph was complete. +</p> + +<p> +It is stated, upon what authority we know not, that his royal highness, after +passing a sleepless night in vain conjectures, despatched at an early hour, one +of his privy-counsellors to Brummel, offering <i>carte blanche</i> if he would +disclose the secret of that mysterious cravat. But the “<i>atrox animus +Catonis</i>” disdained the bribe. He preferred being supplicated, to +being bought, by kings. “Go,” said he to the messenger, with the +spirit of Marius mantling in his veins, “Go, and tell <i>you</i>r master +that you have seen <i>his</i> master.” +</p> + +<p> +For the truth of another anecdote, connected with this cravat, we have +indisputable evidence. A young nobleman of distinguished talents and high +pretensions as to fortune and rank, saw this fatal band, and eager to advance +himself in the rolls of fashion, retired to his chamber to endeavour to +penetrate the method of its construction. He tried every sort of known, and +many sorts of unknown stiffeners to accomplish the end—paper and +pasteboard, and wadding, shavings, and shingles, and planks,—all were +vainly experienced. Gargantua could not have exhibited a greater invention of +expedients than he did; but vainly. After a fortnight of the closest +application, ardour of study and anxiety of mind combined, brought him to the +brink of the grave. His mother having ascertained the origin of his complaint, +waited upon Brummel, who was the only living man that could remove it. She +implored him, by every human motive, to say but one word, to save the life of +her son and prevent her own misery. But the tyrant was immoveable, and the +young man expired a victim of his sternness. +</p> + +<p> +When, at length, yielding to that strong necessity which no man can control, +Brummel was obliged, like Napoleon, to abdicate, the mystery of that mighty +cravat was unfolded. There was found, after his departure to Calais, written on +sheet of paper upon his table, the following epigram of scorn: “STARCH IS +THE MAN.” The cravat of Brummel was merely—starched! Henceforth +starch was introduced into every cravat in Europe. +</p> + +<p> +Brummel still lives, an obscure consul in a petty European town. +</p> + +<p> +Physically there is something to command our admiration in the history of a man +who thus lays at his mercy all ranks of men,—the lofty and the low, the +great, the powerful and the vain: but morally and seriously, no character is +more despicable than that of the mere man of fashion, Seeking nothing but +notoriety, his path to that end is over the ruins of all that is worthy in our +nature. He knows virtue only to despise it; he makes himself acquainted with +human feelings only to outrage them. He commences his career beyond the limits +of decency, and ends it far in the regions of infamy. Feared by all and +respected by none, hated by his worshippers and despised by himself, he +rules,—an object of pity and contempt: and when his power is past, his +existence is forgotten; he lives on in an, oblivion which is to him worse than +death, and the stings of memory goad him to the grave. +</p> + +<p> +The devotee of fashion is a trifler unworthy of his race; the <i>mere</i> +gentleman is a character which may in time become somewhat tiresome; there is a +just mean between the two, where a better conduct than either is to be found. +It is that of a man who, yielding to others, still maintains his self-respect, +and whose concessions to folly are controlled by good sense; who remembers the +value of trifles without forgetting the importance of duties, and resolves so +to regulate his conduct that neither others may be offended by his stiffness, +nor himself have to regret his levity. +</p> + +<p> +Live therefore among men—to conclude our homily after the manner of +Quarles—live therefore among men, like them, yet not disliking thyself; +and let the hues of fashion be reflected from thee, but let them not enter and +colour thee within. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2><a name="chap15"></a>CHAPTER XV.<br /> +MISCELLANEOUS.</h2> + +<p> +There is nothing more ill bred in the world than continual talking about good +breeding. +</p> + +<p> +You should never employ the word “<i>genteel</i>;” the proper word +is “<i>respectable.</i>” +</p> + +<p> +If you are walking down the street with another person on your arm, and stop to +say something to one of your friends, do not commit the too common and most +awkward error of introducing such persons to one another. Never introduce +morning visitors, who happen to meet in your parlour without being acquainted. +If <i>you</i> should be so introduced, remember that the acquaintance +afterwards goes for nothing: you have not the slightest right to expect that +the other should ever speak to you. +</p> + +<p> +If you wish to be introduced to a lady, you must always have her consent +previously asked; this formality it is not necessary to observe in the case of +gentlemen alone. +</p> + +<p> +Presents are the gauge of friendship. They also serve to increase it, and give +it permanence. +</p> + +<p> +Among friends presents ought to be made of things of small value; or, if +valuable, their worth should be derived from the style of the workmanship, or +from some accidental circumstance, rather than from the inherent and solid +richness. Especially never offer to a lady a gift of great cost: it is in the +highest degree indelicate, and looks as if you were desirous of placing her +under an obligation to you, and of buying her good will. The gifts made by +ladies to gentlemen are of the most refined nature possible: they should be +little articles not purchased, but deriving a priceless value as being the +offspring of their gentle skill; a little picture from their pencil, or a +trifle from their needle. +</p> + +<p> +To persons much your superiors, or gentlemen whom you do not know intimately, +there is but one species of appropriate present—game. +</p> + +<p> +If you make a present, and it is praised by the receiver, you should not +yourself commence undervaluing it. If one is offered to you, always accept it; +and however small it may be, receive it with civil and expressed thanks, +without any kind of affectation. Avoid all such deprecatory phrases, as +“I fear I rob you,” etc. +</p> + +<p> +To children, the only presents which you offer are sugar-plums and bon-bons. +</p> + +<p> +Avoid the habit of employing French words in English conversation; it is in +extremely bad taste to be always employing such expressions as +<i>ci-devant</i>, <i>soi-disant</i>, <i>en masse</i>, <i>couleur de rose</i>, +etc. Do not salute your acquaintances with <i>bon jour</i>, nor reply to every +proposition, <i>volontiers.</i> +</p> + +<p> +In speaking of French cities and towns, it is a mark of refinement in education +to pronounce them rigidly according to English rules of speech. Mr. Fox, the +best French scholar, and one of the best bred men in England, always sounded +the x in <i>Bourdeaux</i>, and the s in Calais, and on all occasions pronounced +such names just as they are written. +</p> + +<p> +In society, avoid having those peculiar preferences for some subjects, which +are vulgarly denominated. “<i>hobby horses.</i>” They make your +company a <i>bore</i> to all your friends; and some kind-hearted creature will +take advantage of them and <i>trot</i> you, for the amusement of the company. +</p> + +<p> +A certain degree of reserve, or the appearance of it, should be maintained in +your intercourse with your most intimate friends. To ordinary acquaintances +retain the utmost reserve—never allowing them to read your feelings, not, +on the other hand, attempting to take any liberties with them. Familiarity of +manner is the greatest vice of society. “Ah! allow me, my dear +fellow,” says a rough voice, and at the same moment a thumb and finger +are extended into my snuff-box, which, in removing their prey drop half of it +upon my clothes,—I look up, and recognize a person to whom I was +introduced by mistake last night at the opera. I would be glad to have less +fellowship with such <i>fellows.</i> In former times great philosophers were +said to have demons for familiars,—thereby indicating that a familiar man +is the very devil. +</p> + +<p> +Remember, that all deviations from prescribed forms, on common occasions, are +vulgar; such as sending invitations, or replies, couched in some unusual forms +of speech. Always adhere to the immemorial phrase,—“Mrs. X. +requests the honour of Mr, Y.’s company,” and “Mr. Y. has the +honour of accepting Mrs. X.’s polite invitation.” Never introduce +persons with any outlandish or new-coined expressions; but perform the +operation with mathematical precision—“Mr. A., Mr. A’; Mr. +A’, Mr. A.” +</p> + +<p> +When two gentlemen are walking with a lady in the street, they should not be +both upon the same side of her, but one of them should walk upon the outside +and the other upon the inside. +</p> + +<p> +When you walk with a lady, even if the lady be young and unmarried, offer your +arm to her. This is always done in France, and is practised in this country by +the best bred persons. To be sure, this is done only to married women in +France, because unmarried women never walk alone with gentlemen, but as in +America the latter have the same freedom as the former, this custom should here +be extended to them. +</p> + +<p> +If you are walking with a woman who has your arm, and you cross the street, it +is better not to disengage your arm, and go round upon the outside. Such effort +evinces a palpable attention to form, and <i>that</i> is always to be avoided. +</p> + +<p> +A woman should never take the arms of two men, one being upon either side; nor +should a man carry a woman upon each arm. The latter of these iniquities is +practised only in Ireland; the former perhaps in Kamskatcha. There are, to be +sure, some cases in which it is necessary for the protection of the women, that +they should both take his arm, as in coming home from a concert, or in passing, +on any occasion, through a crowd. +</p> + +<p> +When you receive company in your own house, you should never be much dressed. +This is a circumstance of the first importance in good breeding. +</p> + +<p> +A gentleman should never use perfumes; they are agreeable, however, upon +ladies. +</p> + +<p> +Avoid the use of proverbs in conversation, and all sorts of cant phrases. This +error is, I believe, censured by Lord Chesterfield, and is one of the most +offensively vulgar things which a person can commit. We have frequently been +astonished to hear such a slang phrase as “the whole hog” used by +persons who had pretensions to very superior standing. We would be disposed to +apply to such an expression a criticism of Dr. Johnson’s, which rivals it +in Coarseness: “It has not enough salt to keep it from stinking, enough +wit to prevent its being offensive.” We do not wish to advocate any false +refinement, or to encourage any cockney delicacy: but we may be decent without +being affected. The stable language and raft humour of Crockett and Downing may +do very well to amuse one in a morning paper, but it exhibits little wit and +less good sense to adopt them in the drawing-room. This matter should be +“reformed altogether.” +</p> + +<p> +If a plate be sent to you, at dinner, by the master or mistress of the house, +you should always take it, without offering it to all your neighbours as was in +older times considered necessary. The spirit of antique manners consisted in +exhibiting an attention to ceremony; the spirit of modern manners consists in +avoiding all possible appearance of form. The old custom of deferring +punctiliously to others was awkward and inconvenient. For, the person, in favor +of whom the courtesy was shown, shocked at the idea of being exceeded in +politeness, of course declined it, and a plate was thus often kept vibrating +between two bowing mandarins, till its contents were cold, and the victims of +ceremony were deprived of their dinner. In a case like this, to reverse the +decision which the host has made as to the relative standing of his guests, is +but a poor compliment to him, as it seems to reprove his choice, and may, +besides, materially interfere with his arrangements by rendering +<i>unhelped</i> a person whom he supposes attended to. +</p> + +<p> +The same avoidance of too much attention to yielding place is proper in most +other cases. Shenstone, in some clever verses, has ridiculed the folly; and +Goldsmith, in his “Vicar,” has censured the inconvenience, of such +outrageous formality. These things are now managed better. One person yields +and another accepts without any controversy. +</p> + +<p> +When you are helped to anything at a dinner table, do not wait, with your plate +untouched, until others have begun to eat. This stiff-piece of mannerism is +often occurring in the country, and indeed among all persons who are not +thoroughly bred. As soon as your plate is placed before you, you should take up +your knife and arrange the table furniture around you, if you do not actually +eat. +</p> + +<p> +As to the instruments by which the operation of dining is conducted, it is a +matter of much consequence that entire propriety should be observed as to their +use. We have said nothing about the use of silver forks, because we do not +write for savages; and where, excepting among savages, shall we find any who at +present eat with other than a French fork?. There are occasionally to be found +some ancients, gentlemen of the old school, as it is termed, who persist in +preferring steel, and who will insist on calling for a steel fork if there is +none on the table. They consider the modem custom an affectation, and deem that +all affectation should be avoided. They tread upon the pride of Plato, with +more pride. There is often affectation in shunning affectation. It is better in +things not material to submit to the established habits, especially when, as in +the present case, the balance of convenience is decidedly on the part of +fashion. The ordinary custom among well bred persons, is as follows:—soup +is taken with a spoon. Some foolish <i>fashionables</i> employ a fork! They +might as well make use of a broomstick. The fish which follows is eaten with a +fork, a knife not being used at all. The fork is held in the right hand, and a +piece of bread in the left. For any dish in which cutting is not indispensable, +the same arrangement is correct. When you have upon your plate, before the +dessert, anything partially liquid, or any sauces, you must not take them up +with a knife, but with a piece of bread, which is to be saturated with the +juices, and then lifted to the mouth. If such an article forms part of the +dessert, you should eat it with a spoon. In carving, steel instruments alone +are employed. For fowls a peculiar knife is used, having the blade short and +the handle very long. For fish a broad and pierced silver blade is used. +</p> + +<p> +A dinner—we allude to <i>dinner-parties</i>—in this country, is +generally despatched with too much hurry. We do not mean, that persons commonly +eat too fast, but that the courses succeed one another too precipitately. +Dinner is the last operation of the day, and there is no subsequent business +which demands haste. It is usually intended, especially when there are no +ladies, to sit at the table till nine, ten, or eleven o’clock, and it is +more agreeable that the <i>eating</i> should be prolonged through a +considerable portion of the entire time. The conveniences of digestion also +require more deliberation, and it would therefore not be unpleasant if an +interval of a quarter of an hour or half an hour were allowed to intervene +between the meats and the dessert. +</p> + +<p> +At dinner, avoid taking upon your plate too many things at once. One variety of +meat and one kind of vegetable is the <i>maximum.</i> When you take another +sort of meat, or any dish not properly a vegetable, you always change your +plate. +</p> + +<p> +The fashion of dining inordinately late in this country is foolish. It is +borrowed from England without any regard to the difference in circumstances +between the two nations. In London, the whole system of daily duties is much +later. The fact of parliament’s sitting during the evening and not in the +morning, tends to remove the active part of the day to a much more advanced +hour. When persons rise at ten or two o’clock, it is not to be expected +that they should dine till eight or twelve in the evening. There is nothing of +this sort in France. There they dine at three, or earlier. We have known some +fashionable dinners in different cities in this country at so late an hour as +eight or nine o’clock. This is absurd, where the persons have all +breakfasted at eight in the morning. From four o’clock till five varies +the proper hour for a dinner party here. +</p> + +<p> +Never talk about politics at a dinner table or in a drawing room. +</p> + +<p> +When you are going into a company it is of advantage to run over in your mind, +beforehand, the topics of conversation which you intend to bring up, and to +arrange the manner in which you will introduce them. You may also refresh your +general ideas upon the subjects, and run through the details of the few very +brief and sprightly anecdotes which you are going to repeat; and also have in +readiness one or two brilliant phrases or striking words which you will use +upon occasion. Further than this it is dangerous to make much preparation. If +you commit to memory long speeches with the design of delivering them, your +conversation will become formal, and you will be negligent of the observations +of your company. It will tend also to impair that habit of readiness and +quickness which it is necessary to cultivate in order to be agreeable. +</p> + +<p> +You must be very careful that you do not repeat the same anecdotes or let off +the same good things twice to the same person. Richard Sharpe, the +“conversationist” as he was called in London, kept a regular book +of entry, in which he recorded where and before whom he had uttered severally +his choice sayings. The celebrated Bubb Doddington prepared a manuscript book +of original <i>facetiæ</i>, which he was accustomed to read over when he +expected any distinguished company, trusting to an excellent memory to preserve +him from iteration. +</p> + +<p> +If you accompany your wife to a ball, be very careful not to dance with her. +</p> + +<p> +The lady who gives a ball dances but little, and always selects her partners. +</p> + +<p> +If you are visited by any company whom you wish to drive away forever, or any +friends whom you wish to alienate, entertain them by reading to them your own +productions. +</p> + +<p> +If you ask a lady to dance, and she is engaged, do not prefer a request for her +hand at the next set after that, because she may be engaged for that also, and +for many more; and you would have to run through a long list of +interrogatories, which would be absurd and awkward. +</p> + +<p> +A gentleman must not expect to shine in society, even the most frivolous, +without a considerable stock of knowledge. He must be acquainted with facts +rather than principles. He needs no very sublime sciences; but a knowledge of +biography and literary history, of the fine arts, as painting, engraving, +music, etc., will be of great service to him. +</p> + +<p> +Some men are always seen in the streets with an umbrella under their arm. Such +a foible may be permitted to such men as Mr. Southey and the Duke of +Wellington: but in ordinary men it looks like affectation, and the monotony is +exceedingly <i>boring</i> to the sight. +</p> + +<p> +To applaud at a play is not <i>fashionable</i>; but it is <i>respectable</i> to +evince by a gentle concurrence of one finger and a hand that you perceive and +enjoy a good stroke in an actor. +</p> + +<p> +If you are at a concert, or a private musical party, never beat time with your +feet or your cane. Nothing is more unpleasant. +</p> + +<p> +Few things are more agreeable or more difficult, than to relate anecdotes with +entire propriety. They should be introduced gracefully, have fit connexion with +the previous remarks, and be in perfect keeping with the company, the subject +and the tone of the conversation; they should be short, witty and eloquent, and +they should be new but not far-fetched. +</p> + +<p> +In rapid and eager discourse, when persons are excited and impatient, as at a +ball or in a promenade, repeat nothing but the spirit and soul of a story, +leaping over the particulars. There are however many places and occasions in +which you may bring out the details with advantage, precisely, but not +tediously. When you repeat a true story be always extremely exact. Mem. Not to +forget the point of your story, like most narrators. +</p> + +<p> +When you are telling a flat anecdote by mistake, laugh egregiously, that others +may do the same: when you repeat a spirited and striking bon mot, be grave and +composed, in order that others may not be the same. +</p> + +<p> +For one who has travelled much, to hit the proper medium between too much +reserve and too much intrusion, on the subject of his adventures, is not easy. +Such a person is expected to give amusement by pleasant histories of his +travels, and it is agreeable that he should do so, yet with moderation; he +should not reply to every remark by a memoir, commencing, “When I was in +Japan.” +</p> + +<p> +Rampant witticisms which require one to laugh, are apt to grow fatiguing: it is +better to have a sprightly and amusing vein running through your conversation, +which, betraying no effort, allows one to be grave without offence, or to smile +without pain. +</p> + +<p> +Punning is now decidedly out of date. It is a silly and displeasing thing, when +it becomes a habit. Some one has called it the wit of fools. It is within the +reach of the most trifling, and is often used by them to puzzle and degrade the +wise. Whatever may be its merits, it is now out of fashion. +</p> + +<p> +It is respectable to go to church once on Sunday. When you are there, behave +with decency. You should never walk in fashionable places on Sunday afternoon. +It is notoriously vulgar. If your health requires you to take the air, you +should seek some retired street. +</p> + +<p> +In conversation avoid such phrases as “My <i>dear</i> sir or +madam.” +</p> + +<p> +A gentleman is distinguished as much by his composure as by any other quality. +His exertions are always subdued, and his efforts easy. He is never surprised +into an exclamation or startled by anything. Throughout life he avoids what the +French call <i>scenes</i>, occasions of exhibition, in which the vulgar +delight. He of course has feelings, but he never exhibits any to the world. He +hears of the death of his pointer or the loss of an estate with entire calmness +when others are present. +</p> + +<p> +It is very difficult for a literary man to preserve the perfect manners and +exact semblance of a gentleman. He must be able to throw aside all the +qualities which authorship tends to stamp so deeply upon him, and thoroughly to +despise the cant of the profession. Yet this must be done without any +affectation. Upon the whole, unless he has rare tact, he will please as much by +going into company with all the marks of his employment upon his manners, than +by awkwardly attempting to throw off his load. One would rather see a man with +his fingers inked, than to see him nervously striving to cover them with a +tattered kid glove. As to literary ladies, they make up their minds to +sacrifice all present and personal admiration for future and abiding renown. +</p> + +<p> +It is not considered fashionable to carry a watch. What has a fashionable man +to do with time? Besides he never goes into those obscure parts of the town +where there are no public clocks, and his servant will tell him when it is time +to dress for dinner. A gentleman carries his watch in his pantaloons with a +plain black ribbon attached. It is only worthy of a shop-boy to put it in his +waistcoat pocket. +</p> + +<p> +Custom allows to men the privilege of taking snuff, however unneat this habit +may appear. If you affect the “tangible smell,” always take it from +a box, and not from your waistcoat pocket or a paper. The common opinion, that +Napoleon took snuff from his pocket, (which fact, by the way, is denied by +Bourrienne,) has for ever driven this convenient custom from the practice of +gentlemen, for the same reason that Lord Byron’s anti-neckcloth fashion +has compelled every man of sense to bind a cravat religiously about his throat. +As to taking snuff from a paper, it is vile. +</p> + +<p> +Women should abstain most scrupulously from tobacco, for nothing can be more +fatal to their divinity: they should at least avoid it until past +fifty;—that is to say, if a woman past fifty can anywhere be found. +Chewing is permitted only to galley-slaves and metaphysicians. +</p> + +<p> +It was a favourite maxim of Rivarol, “Do you wish to succeed? Cite proper +names.” Rivarol is dead in exile, having left behind him little property +and less reputation. Judging from all experience, if we were to frame an +extreme maxim, it should be, “If you wish to succeed never cite a proper +name.” It will make you agreeable and hated. Your conversation will be +listened to with interest, and your company shunned with horror. You will +obtain the reputation of a gossip and a scandal-bearer, and you will soon be +obliged either to purchase a razor or apply for a passport. If you are holding +a tete-a-tete with a notorious Mrs. Candour, then, indeed, your tongue should +be as sharp and nimble as the forked lightning. You must beat her at her own +weapons, and convince her that it would be dangerous to traduce your character +to others. +</p> + +<p> +A bachelor is a person who enjoys everything and pays for nothing; a married +man is one that pays for everything and enjoys nothing. The one drives a sulky +through life, and is not expected to take care of any one but himself: the +other keeps a carriage, which is always too full to afford him a comfortable +seat. Be cautious then how you exchange your sulky for a carriage. +</p> + +<p> +In ordinary conversation about persons employ the expressions <i>men</i> and +<i>women</i>; <i>gentleman</i> and <i>lady</i> are <i>distinctive</i> +appellations, and not to be used upon general occasions. +</p> + +<p> +You should say <i>forte-piano</i>, not <i>piano-forte</i>: and the <i>street +door</i>, not the <i>front door.</i> +</p> + +<p> +“A man may have virtue, capacity, and good conduct,” says La +Bruyère, “and yet be insupportable; the air and manner which we neglect, +as little things, are frequently what the world judges us by, and makes them +decide for or against us.” +</p> + +<p> +In your intercourse with the world you must take persons as they are, and +society as you find it. You must never oppose the one, nor attempt to alter the +other. Society is a harlequin stage, upon which you never appear in your own +dress nor without a mask. Keep your real dispositions for your fireside, and +your real character for your private friend. In public, never differ from +anybody, nor from anything. The <i>agreeable</i> man is one who <i>agrees.</i> +</p> + +<p class="center"> +THE END. +</p> + +</div><!--end chapter--> + +<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAWS OF ETIQUETTE ***</div> +<div style='text-align:left'> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will +be renamed. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright +law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, +so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United +States without permission and without paying copyright +royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part +of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project +Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ +concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, +and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following +the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use +of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for +copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very +easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation +of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project +Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may +do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected +by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark +license, especially commercial redistribution. +</div> + +<div style='margin:0.83em 0; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE<br /> +<span style='font-size:smaller'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE<br /> +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</span> +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project +Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full +Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at +www.gutenberg.org/license. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or +destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your +possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a +Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound +by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person +or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this +agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ +electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the +Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection +of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual +works in the collection are in the public domain in the United +States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the +United States and you are located in the United States, we do not +claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, +displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as +all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope +that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting +free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ +works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the +Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily +comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the +same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when +you share it without charge with others. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are +in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, +check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this +agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, +distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any +other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no +representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any +country other than the United States. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other +immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear +prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work +on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the +phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, +performed, viewed, copied or distributed: +</div> + +<blockquote> + <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> + This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most + other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions + whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms + of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online + at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you + are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws + of the country where you are located before using this eBook. + </div> +</blockquote> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is +derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not +contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the +copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in +the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are +redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project +Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply +either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or +obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ +trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any +additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms +will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works +posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the +beginning of this work. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg™ License. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including +any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access +to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format +other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official +version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website +(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense +to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means +of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain +Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the +full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +provided that: +</div> + +<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'> + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed + to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has + agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid + within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are + legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty + payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in + Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg + Literary Archive Foundation.” + </div> + + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ + License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all + copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue + all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ + works. + </div> + + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of + any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of + receipt of the work. + </div> + + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works. + </div> +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project +Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than +are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing +from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of +the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set +forth in Section 3 below. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project +Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ +electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may +contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate +or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or +other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or +cannot be read by your equipment. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right +of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium +with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you +with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in +lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person +or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second +opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If +the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing +without further opportunities to fix the problem. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO +OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of +damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement +violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the +agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or +limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or +unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the +remaining provisions. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in +accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the +production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ +electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, +including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of +the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this +or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or +additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any +Defect you cause. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™ +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of +computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It +exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations +from people in all walks of life. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future +generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see +Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by +U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, +Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up +to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website +and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread +public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND +DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state +visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To +donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project +Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be +freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and +distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of +volunteer support. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in +the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not +necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper +edition. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Most people start at our website which has the main PG search +facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. +</div> + +</div> + +</body> + +</html> + + diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..96cdea2 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #5681 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5681) diff --git a/old/5681.txt b/old/5681.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..809531b --- /dev/null +++ b/old/5681.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2978 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Laws of Etiquette, by A Gentleman + +Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the +copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing +this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. + +This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project +Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the +header without written permission. + +Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the +eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is +important information about your specific rights and restrictions in +how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a +donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. + + +**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** + +**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** + +*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** + + +Title: The Laws of Etiquette + +Author: A Gentleman + +Release Date: May, 2004 [EBook #5681] +[Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule] +[This file was first posted on August 7, 2002] + +Edition: 10 + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK, THE LAWS OF ETIQUETTE *** + + + + +This eBook was produced by Holly Ingraham + +Transcriber's Note: Note the inconsistency of "Brummell" in +one place of the original, and "Brummel" all other places. +Also "Shakspeare," "Don Quixotte," "Sir Piercy," and "Esop" +are as in the original. There was no table of contents. The +original uses both all caps and italics. I have indicated the +last with bracketing blanks, _like this._ + + +********************************** + +THE + +LAWS OF ETIQUETTE; + +or, + +Short Rules and Reflections + +for + +CONDUCT IN SOCIETY. + +BY A GENTLEMAN. + +PHILADELPHIA: + +1836. + + + +PREFACE + +The author of the present volume has endeavoured to embody, +in as short a space as possible, some of the results of his +own experience and observation in society, and submits the +work to the public, with the hope that the remarks which are +contained in it, may prove available for the benefit of +others. It is, of course, scarcely possible that anything +original should be found in a volume like this: almost all +that it contains must have fallen under the notice of every +man of penetration who has been in the habit of frequenting +good society. Many of the precepts have probably been +contained in works of a similar character which have appeared +in England and France since the days of Lord Chesterfield. +Nothing however has been copied from them in the compilation +of this work, the author having in fact scarcely any +acquaintance with books of this description, and many years +having elapsed since he has opened even the pages of the +noble oracle. He has drawn entirely from his own resources, +with the exception of some hints for arrangement, and a few +brief reflections, which have been derived from the French. + +The present volume is almost apart from criticism. It has no +pretensions to be judged as a literary work--its sole merit +depending upon its correctness and fitness of application. +Upon these grounds he ventures to hope for it a favourable +reception. + +INTRODUCTION + +The great error into which nearly all foreigners and most +Americans fall, who write or speak of society in this +country, arises from confounding the political with the +social system. In most other countries, in England, France, +and all those nations whose government is monarchical or +aristocratic, these systems are indeed similar. Society is +there intimately connected with the government, and the +distinctions in one are the origin of gradations in the +other. The chief part of the society of the kingdom is +assembled in the capital, and the same persons who legislate +for the country legislate also for it. But in America the two +systems are totally unconnected, and altogether different in +character. In remodelling the form of the administration, +society remained unrepublican. There is perfect freedom of +political privilege, all are the same upon the hustings, or +at a political meeting; but this equality does not extend to +the drawing-room or the parlour. None are excluded from the +highest councils of the nation, but it does not follow that +all can enter into the highest ranks, of society. In point of +fact, we think that there is more exclusiveness in the +society of this country, than there is in that even of +England--far more than there is in France. And the +explanation may perhaps be found in the fact which we hate +mentioned above. There being there less danger of permanent +disarrangement or confusion of ranks by the occasional +admission of the low-born aspirant, there does not exist the +same necessity for a jealous guarding of the barriers as +there does here. The distinction of classes, also, after the +first or second, is actually more clearly defined, and more +rigidly observed in America, than in any country of Europe. +Persons unaccustomed to look searchingly at these matters, +may be surprised to hear it; but we know from observation, +that there are among the respectable, in any city of the +United States, at least ten distinct ranks. We cannot, of +course, here point them out, because we could not do it +without mentioning names. + +Every man is naturally desirous of finding entrance into the +best society of his country, and it becomes therefore a +matter of importance to ascertain what qualifications are +demanded for admittance. + +A writer who is popularly unpopular, has remarked, that the +test of standing in Boston, is literary eminence; in New +York, wealth; and in Philadelphia, purity of blood. + +To this remark, we can only oppose our opinion, that none of +these are indispensable, and none of them sufficient. The +society of this country, unlike that of England, does not +court literary talent. We have cases in our recollection, +which prove the remark, in relation to the highest ranks, +even of Boston. Wealth has no pretensions to be the standard +anywhere. In New York, the Liverpool of America, although the +rich may make greater display and _bruit,_ yet all of the +merely rich, will find that there does exist a small and +unchanging circle, whether above or below them, 'it is not +ours to say,' yet completely apart from them, into which they +would rejoice to find entrance, and from which they would be +glad to receive emigrants. + +Whatever may be the accomplishments necessary to render one +capable of reaching the highest platform of social eminence, +and it is not easy to define clearly what they are, there is +one thing, and one alone, which will enable any man to +_retain_ his station there; and that is, GOOD BREEDING. +Without it, we believe that literature, wealth, and even +blood, will be unsuccessful. By it, if it co-exist with a +certain capacity of affording pleasure by conversation, any +one, we imagine, could frequent the very best society in +every city of America, and _perhaps the very best alone._ To +obtain, then, the manners of a gentleman is a matter of no +small importance. + +We do not pretend that a man will be metamorphosed into a +gentleman by reading this book, or any other book. Refined +manners are like refined style which Cicero compares to the +colour of the cheeks, which is not acquired by sudden or +violent exposure to heat, but by continual walking in the +sun. Good manners can certainly only be acquired by much +usage in good company. But there are a number of little +forms, imperiously enacted by custom, which may be taught in +this manner, and the conscious ignorance of which often +prevents persons from going into company at all. + +These forms may be abundantly absurd, but still they _must_ +be attended to; for one half the world does and always will +observe them, and the other half is at a great disadvantage +if it does not. Intercourse is constantly taking place, and +an awkward man of letters, in the society of a polished man +of the world, is like a strong man contending with a skilful +fencer. Mr. Addison says, that he once saw the ablest +mathematician in the kingdom utterly embarrassed, from not +knowing whether he ought to stand or sit when my lord duke +drank his health. + +Some of the many errors which are liable to be committed +through ignorance of usage, are pleasantly pointed out in the +following story, which is related by a French writer. + +The Abb, Cosson, professor in the _College Mazarin,_ +thoroughly accomplished in the art of teaching, saturated +with Greek, Latin, and literature, considered himself a +perfect well of science: he had no conception that a man who +knew all Persius and Horace by heart could possibly commit an +error--above all, an error at table. But it was not long +before he discovered his mistake. One day, after dining with +the Abb, de Radonvillers at Versailles, in company with +several courtiers and marshals of France, he was boasting of +the rare acquaintance with etiquette and custom which he had +exhibited at dinner. The Abb, Delille, who heard this eulogy +upon his own conduct, interrupted his harangue, by offering +to wager that he had committed at least a hundred +improprieties at the table. "How is it possible!" exclaimed +Cosson. "I did exactly like the rest of the company." + +"What absurdity!" said the other. "You did a thousand things +which no one else did. First, when you sat down at the table, +what did you do with your napkin?" "My napkin? Why just what +every body else did with theirs. I unfolded it entire]y, and +fastened it to my buttonhole." "Well, my dear friend," said +Delille, "you were the only one that did _that,_ at all +events. No one hangs up his napkin in that style; they are +contented with placing it on their knees. And what did you, +do when you took your soup?" "Like the others, I believe. I +took my spoon in one hand, and my fork in the other--" "Your +fork! Who ever eat soup with a fork?--But to proceed; after +your soup, what did you eat?" "A fresh egg." "And what did +you do with the shell?" "Handed it to the servant who stood +behind my chair." "With out breaking it?" "Without breaking +it, of course." "Well, my dear Abb,, nobody ever eats an egg +without breaking the shell. And after your egg--?" "I asked +the Abb, Radonvillers to send me a piece of the hen near +him." "Bless my soul! a piece of the _hen_? You never speak +of hens excepting in the barn-yard. You should have asked for +fowl or chicken. But you say nothing of your mode of +drinking." "Like all the rest, I asked for _claret_ and +_champagne._" "Let me inform you, then, that persons always +ask for _claret wine_ and _champagne wine._ But, tell me, how +did you eat your bread?" "Surely I did that properly. I cut +it with my knife, in the most regular manner possible." +"Bread should always be broken, not cut. But the coffee, how +did you manage it?" "It was rather too hot, and I poured a +little of it into my saucer." "Well, you committed here the +greatest fault of all. You should never pour your coffee +into the saucer, but always drink it from the cup." The poor +Abb, was confounded. He felt that though one might be master +of the seven sciences, yet that there was another species of +knowledge which, if less dignified, was equally important. + +This occurred many years ago, but there is not one of the +observances neglected by the Abb, Cosson, which is not +enforced with equal rigidness in the present day. + +CHAPTER I. GOOD BREEDING. + +The formalities of refined society were at first established +for the purpose of facilitating the intercourse of persons of +the same standing, and increasing the happiness of all to +whom they apply. They are now kept up, both to assist the +convenience of intercourse and to prevent too great +familiarity. If they are carried too far, and escape from the +control of good sense, they become impediments to enjoyment. +Among the Chinese they serve only the purpose of annoying to +an incalculable degree. "The government," says De Marcy, in +writing of China, "constantly applies itself to preserve, not +only in the court and among the great, but among the people +themselves, a constant habit of civility and courtesy. The +Chinese have an infinity of books upon such subjects; one of +these treatises contains more than three thousand articles.-- +Everything is pointed out with the most minute detail; the +manner of saluting, of visiting, of making presents, of +writing letters, of eating, etc.: and these customs have the +force of laws--no one can dispense with them. There is a +special tribunal at Peking, of which it is one of the chief +duties, to ensure the observance of these civil ordinances?" + +One would think that one was here reading an account of the +capital of France. It depends, then, upon the spirit in which +these forms are observed, whether their result shall be +beneficial or not. The French and the Chinese are the most +formal of all the nations. Yet the one is the stiffest and +most distant; the other, the easiest and most social. + +"We may define politeness," says La Bruy,re, "though we +cannot tell where to fix it in practice. It observes received +usages and customs, is bound to times and places, and is not +the same thing in the two sexes or in different conditions. +Wit alone cannot obtain it: it is acquired and brought to +perfection by emulation. Some dispositions alone are +susceptible of politeness, as others are only capable of +great talents or solid virtues. It is true politeness puts +merit forward, and renders it agreeable, and a man must have +eminent qualifications to support himself without it." +Perhaps even the greatest merit cannot successfully straggle +against unfortunate and disagreeable manners. Lord +Chesterfield says that the Duke of Marlborough owed his first +promotions to the suavity of his manners, and that without it +he could not have risen. + +La Bruy,re has elsewhere given this happy definition of +politeness, the other passage being rather a description of +it. "Politeness seems to be a certain care, by the manner of +our words and actions, to make others pleased with us and +themselves." + +We must here stop to point out an error which is often +committed both in practice and opinion, and which consists in +confounding together the gentleman and the man of fashion. No +two characters can be more distinct than these. Good sense +and self-respect are the foundations of the one--notoriety +and influence the objects of the other. Men of fashion are to +be seen everywhere: a pure and mere gentleman is the rarest +thing alive. Brummel was a man of fashion; but it would be a +perversion of terms to apply to him "a very expressive word +in our language,--a word, denoting an assemblage of many real +virtues and of many qualities approaching to virtues, and an +union of manners at once pleasing and commanding respect,-- +the word gentleman."* The requisites to compose this last +character are natural ease of manner, and an acquaintance +with the "outward habit of encounter"--dignity and self- +possession--a respect for all the decencies of life, and +perfect freedom from all affectation. Dr. Johnson's bearing +during his interview with the king showed him to be a +thorough gentleman, and demonstrates how rare and elevated +that character is. When his majesty expressed in the language +of compliment his high opinion of Johnson's merits, the +latter bowed in silence. If Chesterfield could have retained +sufficient presence of mind to have done the same on such an +occasion, he would have applauded himself to the end of his +days. So delicate is the nature of those qualities that +constitute a gentleman, that there is but one exhibition of +this description of persons in all the literary and dramatic +fictions from Shakespeare downward. Scott has not attempted +it. Bulwer, in "Pelham," has shot wide of the mark. It was +reserved for the author of two very singular productions, +"Sydenham" and its continuation "Alice Paulet"--works of +extraordinary merits and extraordinary faults--to portray +this character completely, in the person of Mr. Paulet + +* Charles Butler's Reminiscences + +CHAPTER II. DRESS. + +First impressions are apt to be permanent; it is therefore of +importance that they should be favourable. The dress of an +individual is that circumstance from which you first form +your opinion of him. It is even more prominent than manner, +It is indeed the only thing which is remarked in a casual +encounter, or during the first interview. It, therefore, +should be the first care. + +What style is to our thoughts, dress is to our persons. It +may supply the place of more solid qualities, and without it +the most solid are of little avail. Numbers have owed their +elevation to their attention to the toilet. Place, fortune, +marriage have all been lost by neglecting it. A man need not +mingle long with the world to find occasion to exclaim with +Sedaine, "Ah! mon habit, que je vous remercie!" In spite of +the proverb, the dress often _does_ make the monk. + +Your dress should always be consistent with your age and your +natural exterior. That which looks outr, on one man, will be +agreeable on another. As success in this respect depends +almost entirely upon particular circumstances and personal +peculiarities, it is impossible to give general directions of +much importance. We can only point out the field for study +and research; it belongs to each one's own genius and +industry to deduce the results. However ugly you may be, rest +assured that there is some style of habiliment which will +make you passable. + +If, for example, you have a stain upon your cheek which +rivals in brilliancy the best Chateau-Margout; or, are +afflicted with a nose whose lustre dims the ruby, you may +employ such hues of dress, that the eye, instead of being +shocked by the strangeness of the defect, will be charmed by +the graceful harmony of the colours. Every one cannot indeed +be an Adonis, but it is his own fault if he is an Esop. + +If you have bad, squinting eyes, which have lost their lashes +and are bordered with red, you should wear spectacles. If the +defect be great, your glasses should be coloured. In such +cases emulate the sky rather than the sea: green spectacles +are an abomination, fitted only for students in divinity,-- +blue ones are respectable and even _distingue._ + +Almost every defect of face may be concealed by a judicious +use and arrangement of hair. Take care, however, that your +hair be not of one colour and your whiskers of another; and +let your wig be large enough to cover the _whole_ of your red +or white hair. + +It is evident, therefore, that though a man may be ugly, +there is no necessity for his being shocking. Would that all +men were convinced of this! I verily believe that if Mr. -- +in his walking-dress, and Mr. -- in his evening costume were +to meet alone, in some solitary place, where there was +nothing to divert their attention from one another, they +would expire of mutual hideousness. + +If you have any defect, so striking and so ridiculous as to +procure you a _nickname_ then indeed there is but one +remedy,--renounce society. + +In the morning, before eleven o'clock even if you go out, you +should not be dressed. You would be stamped a _parvenu_ if +you were seen in anything better than a reputable old frock +coat. If you remain at home, and are a bachelor, it is +permitted to receive visitors in a morning gown. In summer, +calico; in winter, figured cloth, faced with fur. At dinner, +a coat, of course, is indispensable. + +The effect of a frock coat is to conceal the height. If, +therefore, you are beneath the ordinary statue, or much above +it, you should affect frock coats on all occasions that +etiquette permits. + +Before going to a ball or party it is not sufficient that you +consult your mirror twenty times. You must be personally +inspected by your servant or a friend. Through defect of +this, I once saw a gentleman enter a ball-room, attired with +scrupulous elegance, but with one of his suspenders curling +in graceful festoons about his feet. His glass could not show +what was behind. + +If you are about to present yourself in a company composed +only of men, you may wear boots. If there be but one lady +present, pumps and silk-stockings are indispensable. + +There is a common proverb which says, that if a man be well +dressed as to head and feet, he may present himself +everywhere. The assertion is as false as Mr. Kemble's voice. +Happy indeed if it were necessary to perfect only the +extremities. The coat, the waistcoat, the gloves, and, above +all, the cravat, must be alike ignorant of blemish. + +Upon the subject of the cravat--(for heaven's sake and +Brummel's, never appear in a stock after twelve o'clock)--We +cannot at present say anything. If we were to say anything, +we could not be content without saying all, and to say all +would require a folio. A book has been published upon the +subject, entitled "The Cravat considered in its moral, +literary, political, military, and religious attributes." +This and a clever, though less profound, treatise on "The art +of tying the Cravat," are as indispensable to a gentleman as +an ice at twelve o'clock. + +When we speak of excellence in dress we do not mean richness +of clothing, nor manifested elaboration. Faultless propriety, +perfect harmony, and a refined simplicity,--these are the +charms which fascinate here. + +It is as great a sin to be finical in dress as to be +negligent. + +Upon this subject the ladies are the only infallible oracles. +Apart from the perfection to which they must of necessity +arrive, from devoting their entire existence to such +considerations, they seem to be endued with an inexpressible +tact, a sort of sixth sense, which reveals intuitively the +proper distinctions. That your dress is approved by a man is +nothing;--you cannot enjoy the high satisfaction of being +perfectly comme il faut, until your performance has received +the seal of a woman's approbation. + +If the benefits to be derived from cultivating your exterior +do not appear sufficiently powerful to induce attention, the +inconveniences arising from too great disregard may perhaps +prevail. Sir Matthew Hale, in the earlier part of his life, +dressed so badly that he was once seized by the press-gang. +Not long since, as I entered the hall of a public hotel, I +saw a person so villainously habited, that supposing him to +be one of the servants, I desired him to take my luggage +upstairs, and was on the point of offering him a shilling, +when I discovered that I was addressing the Honorable Mr. * * +*, one of the most eminent American statesmen. + +CHAPTER III. SALUTATIONS. + +The salutation, says a French writer, is the touchstone of +good breeding. According to circumstances, it should be +respectful, cordial, civil, affectionate or familiar:--an +inclination of the head, a gesture with the hand, the +touching or doffing of the hat. + +If you remove your hat you need not at the same time bend the +dorsal vertebr' of your body, unless you wish to be very +reverential, as in saluting a bishop. + +It is a mark of high breeding not to speak to a lady in the +street, until you perceive that she has noticed you by an +inclination of the head. + +Some ladies _courtesy_ in the street, a movement not +gracefully consistent with locomotion. They should always +_bow._ + +If an individual of the lowest rank, or without any rank at +all, takes off his hat to you, you should do the same in +return. A bow, says La Fontaine, is a note drawn at sight. If +you acknowledge it, you must pay the full amount. The two +best-bred men in England, Charles the Second and George the +Fourth, never failed to take off their hats to the meanest of +their subjects. + +Avoid condescending bows to your friends and equals. If you +meet a rich parvenu, whose consequence you wish to reprove, +you may salute him in a very patronizing manner: or else, in +acknowledging his bow, look somewhat surprised and say, +"Mister--eh--eh?" + +If you have remarkably fine teeth, you may smile +affectionately upon the bowee, without speaking. + +In passing ladies of rank, whom you meet in society, bow, but +do not speak. + +If you have anything to say to any one in the street, +especially a lady, however intimate you may be, do not stop +the person, but turn round and walk in company; you can take +leave at the end of the street. + +If there is any one of your acquaintance, with whom you have +a difference, do not avoid looking at him, unless from the +nature of things the quarrel is necessarily for life. It is +almost always better to bow with cold civility, though +without speaking. + +As a general rule never _cut_ any one in the street. Even +political and steamboat acquaintances should be noticed by +the slightest movement in the world. If they presume to +converse with you, or stop you to introduce their companion, +it is then time to use your eye-glass, and say, "I never knew +you." + +If you address a lady in the open air, you remain uncovered +until she has desired you _twice_ to put on your hat. In +general, if you are in any place where _etiquette_ requires +you to remain uncovered or standing, and a lady, or one much +your superior, requests you to be covered or to sit, you may +how off the command. If it is repeated, you should comply. +You thereby pay the person a marked, but delicate, +compliment, by allowing their will to be superior to the +general obligations of etiquette. + +When two Americans, who "have not been introduced," meet in +some public place, as in a theatre, a stagecoach, or a +steamboat, they will sit for an hour staring in one another's +faces, but without a word of conversation. This form of +unpoliteness has been adopted from the English, and it is as +little worthy of imitation as the form of their government. +Good sense and convenience are the foundations of good +breeding; and it is assuredly vastly more reasonable and more +agreeable to enjoy a passing gratification, when no sequent +evil is to be apprehended, than to be rendered uncomfortable +by an ill-founded pride. It is therefore better to carry on +an easy and civil conversation. A snuff-box, or some polite +accommodation rendered, may serve for an opening. Talk only +about generalities,--the play, the roads, the weather. Avoid +speaking of persons or politics, for, if the individual is of +the opposite party to yourself, you will be engaged in a +controversy: if he holds the same opinions, you will be +overwhelmed with a flood of vulgar intelligence, which may +soil your mind. Be reservedly civil while the colloquy lasts, +and let the acquaintance cease with the occasion. + +When you are introduced to a gentleman do not give your hand, +but merely bow with politeness: and if you have requested the +introduction, or know the person by reputation, you may make +a speech. I am aware that high authority might easily be +found in this country to sanction the custom of giving the +hand upon a first meeting, but it is undoubtedly a solecism +in manners. The habit has been adopted by us, with some +improvement for the worse, from France. When two Frenchmen +are presented to one another, each _presses_ the other's hand +with delicate affection. The English, however, never do so: +and the practice, if abstractly correct, is altogether +inconsistent with the caution of manner which is +characteristic of their nation and our own. If we are to +follow the French, in shaking hands with one whom we have +never before seen, we should certainly imitate them also in +kissing our _intimate_ male acquaintances. If, however, you +ought only to bow to a new acquaintance, you surely should do +more to old ones. If you meet an intimate friend fifty times +in a morning, give your hand every time,--an observance of +propriety, which, though worthy of universal adoption, is in +this country only followed by the purists in politeness. The +requisitions of etiquette, if they should be obeyed at all, +should be obeyed fully. This decent formality prevents +acquaintance from being too distant, while, at the same time, +it preserves the "familiar" from becoming "vulgar." They may +be little things, but + +"These little things are great to little men." + +Goldsmith. + +CHAPTER IV. THE DRAWING-ROOM. COMPANY. CONVERSATION. + +The grand object for which a gentleman exists, is to excel in +company. Conversation is the mean of his distinction,--the +drawing-room the scene of his glory. + +When you enter a drawing-room, where there is a ball or a +party, you salute the lady of the house before speaking to +any one else. Even your most intimate friends are enveloped +in an opaque atmosphere until you have made your bow to your +entertainer. We must take occasion here to obelize a custom +which prevails too generally in this country. The company +enter the back door of the back parlour, and the mistress of +the house is seated at the other extremity of the front +parlour. It is therefore necessary to traverse the length of +two rooms in order to reach her. A voyage of this kind is by +no means an easy undertaking, when there are Circes and +Calypsos assailing one on every side; and when one has +reached the conclusion, one cannot perhaps distinguish the +object of one's search at a _coup d'oeil._ It would be in +every point of view more appropriate if the lady were to +stand directly opposite to the door of the back parlour. Such +is the custom in the best companies abroad. Upon a single +gentleman entering at a late hour, it is not so obligatory to +speak first to the mistress of the ceremonies. He may be +allowed to converge his way up to her. When you leave a room +before the others, go without speaking to any one, and, if +possible, unseen. + +Never permit the sanctity of the drawing-room to be violated +by a boot. + +Fashionable society is divided into _sets,_ in all of which +there is some peculiarity of manner, or some dominant tone of +feeling. It is necessary to study these peculiarities before +entering the circle. + +In each of these sets there is generally some _gentleman,_ +who rules, and gives it its character, or, rather, who is not +ruler, but the first and most favoured subject, and the prime +minister of the ladies' will. Him you must endeavour to +imitate, taking care not to imitate him so well as to excel +him. To differ in manner or opinion from him is to render +yourself unfit for that circle. To speak disrespectfully of +him is to insult personally every lady who composes it. + +In company, though none are "free," yet all are "equal." All +therefore whom you meet, should be treated with equal +respect, although interest may dictate toward each different +degrees of attention. It is disrespectful to the inviter to +shun any of her guests. Those whom she has honoured by asking +to her house, you should sanction by admitting to your +acquaintance. + +If you meet any one whom you have never heard of before at +the table of a gentleman, or in the drawing-room of a lady, +you may converse with him with entire propriety. The form of +"introduction" is nothing more than a statement by a mutual +friend that two gentlemen are by rank and manners fit +acquaintances for one another. All this may be presumed from +the fact, that both meet at a respectable house. This is the +theory of the matter. Custom, however, requires that you +should take the earliest opportunity afterwards to be +regularly presented to such an one. + +Men of all sorts of occupations meet in society. As they go +there to unbend their minds and escape from the fetters of +business, you should never, in an evening, speak to a man +about his professions. Do not talk of politics with a +journalist, of fevers to a physician, of stocks to a broker,- +-nor, unless you wish to enrage him to the utmost, of +education to a collegian. The error which is here condemned +is often committed from mere good nature and a desire to be +affable. But it betrays to a gentleman, ignorance of the +world--to a philosopher, ignorance of human nature. The one +considers that "Tous les hommes sont ,gaux devant la +politesse:" the other remembers that though it may be +agreeable to be patronised and assisted, yet it is still more +agreeable to be treated as if you needed no patronage, and +were above assistance. + +Sir Joshua Reynolds once received from two noblemen +invitations to visit them on Sunday morning. The first, whom +he waited upon, welcomed him with the most obsequious +condescension, treated him with all the attention in the +world, professed that he was so desirous of seeing him, that +he had mentioned Sunday as the time for his visit, supposing +him to be too much engaged during the week, to spare time +enough for the purpose, concluded his compliments by an +eulogy on painting, and smiled him affectionately to the +door. Sir Joshua left him, to call upon the other. That one +received him with respectful civility, and behaved to him as +he would have behaved to an equal in the peerage:--said +nothing about Raphael nor Correggio, but conversed with ease +about literature and men. This nobleman was the Earl of +Chesterfield. Sir Joshua felt, that though the one had said +that he respected him, the other had proved that he did, and +went away from this one gratified rather than from the first. +Reader, there is wisdom in this anecdote. Mark, learn, and +inwardly digest it: and let this be the moral which you +deduce,--that there is distinction in society, but that there +are no distinctions. + +The great business in company is conversation. It should be +studied as art. Style in conversation is as important, and as +capable of cultivation as style in writing. The manner of +saying things is what gives them their value. + +The most important requisite for succeeding here, is constant +and unfaltering attention. That which Churchill has noted as +the greatest virtue on the stage, is also the most necessary +in company,--to be "always attentive to the business of the +scene." Your understanding should, like your person, be armed +at all points. Never go into society with your mind _en +deshabille._ It is fatal to success to be all absent or +_distrait._ The secret of conversation has been said to +consist in building upon the remark of your companion. Men of +the strongest minds, who have solitary habits and bookish +dispositions, rarely excel in sprightly colloquy, because +they seize upon the _thing_ itself,--the subject abstractly,- +-instead of attending to the _language_ of other speakers, +and do not cultivate _verbal_ pleasantries and refinements. +He who does otherwise gains a reputation for quickness, and +pleases by showing that he has regarded the observation of +others. + +It is an error to suppose that conversation consists in +talking. A more important thing is to listen discreetly. +Mirabeau said, that to succeed in the world, it is necessary +to submit to be taught many things which you understand, by +persons who know nothing about them. Flattery is the +smoothest path to success; and the most refined and +gratifying compliment you can pay, is to listen. "The wit of +conversation consists more in finding it in others," says La +Bruy,re, "than in showing a great deal yourself: he who goes +from your conversation pleased with himself and his own wit, +is perfectly well pleased with you. Most men had rather +please than admire you, and seek less to be instructed,--nay, +delighted,--than to be approved and applauded. The most +delicate pleasure is to please another." + +It is certainly proper enough to convince others of your +merits. But the highest idea which you can give a man of your +own penetration, is to be thoroughly impressed with his. + +Patience is a social engine, as well as a Christian virtue. +To listen, to wait, and to he wearied are the certain +elements of good fortune. + +If there be any foreigner present at a dinner party, or small +evening party, who does not understand the language which is +spoken, good breeding requires that the conversation should +be carried on entirely in his language. Even among your most +intimate friends, never address any one in a language not +understood by all the others. It is as bad as whispering. + +Never speak to any one in company about a private affair +which is not understood by others, as asking how _tha_t +matter is coming on, &c. In so doing you indicate your +opinion that the rest are _de trop._ If you wish to make any +such inquiries, always explain to others the business about +which you inquire, if the subject admit of it. + +If upon the entrance of a visitor you continue a conversation +begun before, you should always explain the subject to the +new-comer. + +If there is any one in the company whom you do not know, be +careful how you let off any epigrams or pleasant little +sarcasms. You might be very witty upon halters to a man whose +father had been hanged. The first requisite for successful +conversation is to know your company well. + +We have spoken above of the necessity of relinquishing the +prerogative of our race, and being contented with recipient +silence. There is another precept of a kindred nature to be +observed, namely, not to talk too well when you do talk. You +do not raise yourself much in the opinion of another, if at +the same time that you amuse him, you wound him in the nicest +point,--his self-love. Besides irritating vanity, a constant +flow of wit is excessively fatiguing to the listeners. A +witty man is an agreeable acquaintance, but a tiresome +friend. "The wit of the company, next to the butt of the +company," says Mrs. Montagu, "is the meanest person in it. +The great duty of conversation is to follow suit, as you do +at whist: if the eldest hand plays the deuce of diamonds, let +not his next neighbour dash down the king of hearts, because +his hand is full of honours. I do not love to see a man of +wit win all the tricks in conversation." + +In addressing any one, always look at him; and if there are +several present, you will please more by directing some +portion of your conversation, as an anecdote or statement, to +each one individually in turn. This was the great secret of +Sheridan's charming manner. His bon-mots were not numerous. + +Never ask a question under any circumstances. In the first +place it is too proud; in the second place, it may be very +inconvenient or very awkward to give a reply. A lady lately +inquired of what branch of medical practice a certain +gentleman was professor. He held the chair of _midwifery_! + +It is indispensable for conversation to be well acquainted +with the current news and the historical events of the last +few years. It is not convenient to be quite so far behind the +rest of the world in such matters, as the Courier des Etats- +Unis. That sapient journal lately announced the dethronement +of Charles X. We may expect soon to hear of the accession of +Louis Philippe. + +In society never quote. If you get entangled in a dispute +with some learned blockhead, you may silence him with a few +extemporary quotations. Select the author for whom he has the +greatest admiration, and give him a passage in the style of +that writer, which most pointedly condemns the opinion he +supports. If it does not convince him, he will be so much +stunned with amazement that you can make your escape, and +avoid the unpleasant necessity of knocking him down. + +The ordinary weapons which one employs in social encounter, +are, whether dignified or not, always at least honourable. +There are some, however, who habitually prefer to bribe the +judge, rather than strengthen their cause. The instrument of +such is flattery. There are, indeed, cases in which a man of +honour may use the same weapon; as there are cases in which a +poisoned sword may be employed for self-defence. + +Flattery prevails over all, always, and in all places; it +conquers the conqueror of Dan"e: few are beneath it, none +above it: the court, the camp, the church, are the scenes of +its victories, and all mankind the subjects of its triumphs. +It will be acknowledged, then, that a man possesses no very +contemptible power who can flatter skillfully. + +The power of flattery may be derived from several sources. It +may be, that the person flattered, finding himself gratified, +and conscious that it is to the flatterer that he is indebted +for this gratification, feels an obligation to him, without +inquiring the reason; or it may be, that imagining ourselves +to stand high in the good opinion of the one that praises us, +We comply with what he desires, rather than forfeit that +esteem: or, finally, flattery may be only a marked +politeness, and we submit ourselves to the control of the +flatterer rather than be guilty of the rudeness of opposing +him. + +Flattery never should be direct. It should not be stated, but +inferred. It is better acted than uttered. Flattery should +seem to be the unwitting and even unwilling expression of +genuine admiration. Some very weak persons do not require +that expressions of praise and esteem toward them should be +sincere. They are pleased with the incense, although they +perceive whence it arises: they are pleased that they are of +importance enough to have their favour courted. But in most +eases it is necessary that the flattery should appear to be +the honest offspring of the feelings. _Such_ flattery _must_ +succeed; for, it is founded upon a principle in our nature +which is as deep as life; namely, that we always love those +who we think love us. + +It is sometimes flattery to accept praises. + +Never flatter one person in the presence of another. + +Never commend a lady's musical skill to another lady who +herself plays. + +It has often, however, a good effect to praise one man to his +particular friend, if it be for something to which that +friend has himself no pretensions. + +It is an error to imagine that men are less intoxicated with +flattery than women. The only difference is that esteem must +be expressed to women, but proved to men. + +Flattery is of course efficacious to obtain positive +benefits. It is of, more constant use, however, for purposes +of defence. You conquer an attack of rudeness by courtesy: +you avert an attack of accusation by flattery. Every:one +remembers the anecdote of Dr. Johnson and Mr. Ewing. +"Prince," said Napoleon to Talleyrand, "they tell me that you +sometimes speculate improperly in the funds. "They do me +wrong then," said Talleyrand. "But how did you acquire so +much money!" "I bought stock the day before you were +proclaimed First Consul," replied the ex-bishop, "and I sold +it the day after." + +Compliments are light skirmishes in the war of flattery, for +the purpose of obtaining an occasional object. They are +little false coins that you receive with one hand and pay +away with the other. To flatter requires a profound knowledge +of human nature and of the character of your subject; to +compliment skillfully, it is sufficient that you are a pupil +of Spurzheim. + +It is a common practice with men to abstain from grave +conversation with women. And the habit is in general +judicious. If the woman is young, gay and trifling, talk to +her only of the latest fashions, the gossip of the day, etc. +But this in other cases is not to be done. Most women who are +a little old, particularly married women -- and even some who +are young -- wish to obtain a reputation for intellect and an +acquaintance With science. You therefore pay them a real +compliment, and gratify their self-love, by conversing +occasionally upon grave matters, which they do not +understand, and do not really relish. You may interrupt a +discussion on the beauty of a dahlia, by observing that as +you know that they take an interest in such things you +mention the discovery of a new method of analyzing curves of +double curvature. Men who talk only of trifles will rarely be +popular with women past twenty-five. + +Talk to a mother about her children. Women are never tired of +hearing of themselves and their children. + +If you go to a house where there are children you should take +especial care to conciliate their good will by a little manly +_tete-a-tete,_ otherwise you may get a ball against your +skins, or be tumbled from a three-legged chair. + +To be able to converse with women you must study their +vocabulary. You would make a great mistake in interpreting +_never, forever,_ as they are explained in Johnson. + +Do not be for ever telling a woman that she is handsome, +witty, etc. She knows that a vast deal better than you do. + +Do not allow your love for one woman to prevent your paying +attention to others. The object of your love is the only one +who ought to perceive it. + +A little pride, which reminds you what is due to yourself, +and a little good nature, which suggests what is due to +others, are the pre-requisites for the moral constitution of +a gentleman. + +Too much vivacity and too much inertness are both fatal to +politeness. By the former we are hurried too far, by the +latter we are kept too much back. + +_Nil admirari,_ the precept of stoicism, is the precept for +conduct among gentlemen. All excitement must be studiously +avoided. When you are with ladies the case is different. +Among them, wonder, astonishment, ecstacy, and enthusiasm, +are necessary in order to be believed. + +Never dispute in the presence of other persons. If a man +states an opinion which you cannot adopt, say nothing. If he +states a fact which is of little importance, you may +carelessly assent. When you differ let it be indirectly; +rather a want of assent than actual dissent. + +If you wish to inquire about anything, do not do it by asking +a question; but introduce the subject, and give the person an +opportunity of saying as much as he finds it agreeable to +impart. Do not even say, "How is your brother to-day?" but "I +hope your brother is quite well." + +Never ask a lady a question about anything whatever. + +It is a point of courtly etiquette which is observed +rigorously by every one who draws nigh, that a question must +never be put to a king. + +Never ask a question about the price of a thing. This +horrible error is often committed by a _nouveau riche._ + +If you have accepted an invitation to a party never fail to +keep your promise. It is cruel to the lady of the house to +accept, and then send an apology at the last moment. +Especially do not break your word on account of bad weather. +You may be certain that many others will, and the inciter +will be mortified by the paucity of her guests. A cloak and a +carriage will secure you from all inconvenience, and you will +be conferring a real benefit. + +CHAPTER V. THE ENTRANCE INTO SOCIETY. + +Women, particularly women a little on the decline, are those +who make the reputation of a young man. When the lustre of +their distinction begins to fade, a slight feeling of less +wonted leisure, perhaps a little spite, makes them observe +attentively those who surround them. Eager to gain new +admirers, they encourage the first steps of a _debutant_ in +the career of society, and exert themselves to fit him to do +honour to their patronage. + +A young man, therefore, in entering the world, cannot be too +attentive to conciliate the goodwill of women. Their +approbation and support will serve him instead of a thousand +good qualities. Their judgment dispenses with fortune, +talent, and even intelligence. "Les hommes font les lois: les +femmes font les reputations." + +The desire of pleasing is, of course, the basis of social +connexion. Persons who enter society with the intention of +producing an effect, and of being distinguished, however +clever they may be, are never agreeable. They are always +tiresome, and often ridiculous. Persons, who enter life with +such pretensions, have no opportunity for improving +themselves and profiting by experience. They are not in a +proper state to _observe_: indeed, they look only for the +effect which they produce, and with that they are not often +gratified. They thrust themselves into all conversations, +indulge in continual anecdotes, which are varied only by dull +disquisitions, listen to others with impatience and +heedlessness, and are angry that they seem to be attending to +themselves. Such men go through scenes of pleasure, enjoying +nothing. They are equally disagreeable to themselves and +others. Young men should, therefore, content themselves with +being natural. Let them present themselves with a modest +assurance: let them observe, hear, and examine, and before +long they will rival their models. + +The conversation of those women who are not the most lavishly +supplied with personal beauty, will be of the most advantage +to the young aspirant. Such persons have cultivated their +manners and conversation more than those who can rely upon +their natural endowments. The absence of pride and pretension +has improved their good nature and their affability. They are +not too much occupied in contemplating their own charms, to +be disposed to indulge in gentle criticism on others. One +acquires from them an elegance in one's manners as well as +one's expressions. Their kindness pardons every error, and to +instruct or reprove, their acts are so delicate that the +lesson which they give, always without offending, is sure to +be profitable, though it may be often unperceived. + +Women observe all the delicacies of propriety in manners, and +all the shades of impropriety, much better than men; not only +because they attend to them earlier and longer, but because +their perceptions are more refined than those of the other +sex, who are habitually employed about greater things. Women +divine, rather than arrive at, proper conclusions. + +The whims and caprices of women in society should of course +be tolerated by men, who themselves require toleration for +greater inconveniences. But this must not be carried too far. +There are certain limits to empire which, if they themselves +forget, should be pointed out to them with delicacy and +politeness. You should be the slave of women, but not of all +their fancies. + +Compliment is the language of intercourse from men to women. +But be careful to avoid elaborate and common-place forms of +gallant speech. Do not strive to make those long eulogies on +a woman, which have the regularity and nice dependency of a +proposition in Euclid, and might be fittingly concluded by Q. +E. D. Do not be always undervaluing her rival in a woman's +presence, nor mistaking a woman's daughter for her sister. +These antiquated and exploded attempts denote a person who +has learned the world more from books than men. + +The quality which a young man should most affect in +intercourse with gentlemen, is a decent modesty: but he must +avoid all bashfulness or timidity. His flights must not go +too far; but, so far as they go, let them be marked by +perfect assurance. + +Among persons who are much your seniors behave with the +utmost respectful deference. As they find themselves sliding +out of importance they may be easily conciliated by a little +respect. + +By far the most important thing to be attended to, is ease of +manner. Grace may be added afterwards, or be omitted +altogether: it is of much less moment than is commonly +believed. Perfect propriety and entire ease are sufficient +qualifications for standing in society, and abundant +prerequisites for distinction. + +There is the most delicate shade of difference between +civility and intrusiveness, familiarity and common-place, +pleasantry and sharpness, the natural and the rude, gaiety +and carelessness; hence the inconveniences of society, and +the errors of its members. To define well in conduct these +distinctions, is the great art of a man of the world. It is +easy to know what to do; the difficulty is to know what to +avoid. + +Long usage--a sort of moral magnetism, a tact acquired by +frequent and long associating with others--alone give those +qualities which keep one always from error, and entitle him +to the name of a thorough gentleman. + +A young man upon first entering into society should select +those persons who are most celebrated for the propriety and +elegance of their manners. He should frequent their company +and imitate their conduct. There is a disposition inherent, +in all, which has been noticed by Horace and by Dr. Johnson, +to imitate faults, because they are more readily observed and +more easily followed. There are, also, many foibles of manner +and many refinements of affectation, which sit agreeably upon +one man, which if adopted by another would become unpleasant. +There are even some excellences of deportment which would not +suit another whose character is different. For successful +imitation in anything, good sense is indispensable. It is +requisite correctly to appreciate the natural differences +between your model and yourself, and to introduce such +modifications in the copy as may be consistent with it. + +Let not any man imagine, that he shall easily acquire these +qualities which will constitute him a gentleman. It is +necessary not only to exert the highest degree of art, but to +attain also that higher accomplishment of concealing art. The +serene and elevated dignity which mark that character, are +the result of untiring and arduous effort. After the +sculpture has attained the shape of propriety, it remains to +smooth off all the marks of the chisel. "A gentleman," says a +celebrated French author, "is one who has reflected deeply +upon all the obligations which belong to his station, and who +has applied himself ardently to fulfil them with grace." + +Polite without importunity, gallant without being offensive, +attentive to the comfort of all; employing a well-regulated +kindness, witty at the proper times, discreet, indulgent, +generous, he exercises, in his sphere, a high degree of moral +authority; he it is, and he alone, that one should imitate. + +CHAPTER VI. LETTERS. + +Always remember that the terms of compliment at the close of +a letter--"I have the honour to be your very obedient +servant," etc. are merely forms--"signifying nothing." Do not +therefore avoid them on account of pride, or a dislike to the +person addressed. Do not presume, as some do, to found +expectations of favour or promotion from great men who +profess themselves your obliged servant. + +In writing a letter of business it is extremely vulgar to use +satin or glazed gold-edged paper. Always employ, on such +occasions, plain American paper. Place the date at the top of +the page, and if you please, the name of the person at the +top also, just above the 'Sir;' though this last is +indifferent. + +In letters to gentlemen always place the date at the end of +the letter, below his name. Use the best paper, but not +figured, and never fail to enclose it in an envelope. +Attention to these matters is indispensable. + +To a person whom you do not know well, say Sir, not 'Dear +Sir.' It formerly was usual in writing to a distinguished man +to employ the form 'Respected Sir,' or something of the kind. +This is now out of fashion. + +There are a great many forms observed by the French in their +letters, which are necessary to be known before addressing +one of that nation. You will find them in their books upon +such subjects, or learn them from your French master. One +custom of theirs is worthy of adoption among us: to +proportion the distance between the 'Sir' and the first line +of the letter, to the rank of the person to whom you write. +Among the French to neglect attending to this would give +mortal offence. It obtains also in other European nations. +When the Duke of Buckingham was at the court of Spain, some +letters passed between the Spanish minister Olivez and +himself,--the two proudest men on earth. The Spaniard wrote a +letter to the Englishman, and put the 'Monsieur' on a line +with the beginning of his letter. The other, in his reply, +placed the 'Monsieur' a little below it. + +A note of invitation or reply is always to be enclosed in an +envelope. + +Wafers are now entirely exploded. A letter of business is +sealed with red wax, and marked with some common stamp. +Letters to gentlemen demand red wax sealed with your arms. In +notes to ladies employ coloured wax, but not perfumed. + +CHAPTER VII. VISITS. + +Of visits there are various sorts; visits of congratulation, +visits of condolence, visits of ceremony, visits of +friendship. To each belong different customs. + +A visit and an insult must be always returned. + +Visits of ceremony should be very short. Go at some time when +business demands the employment of every moment. In visits of +friendship adopt a different course. + +If you call to see an acquaintance at lodgings, and cannot +find any one to announce you, you knock very lightly at the +door, and wait some time before entering. If you are in too +great a hurry, you might find the person drawing off a night- +cap. + +Respectable visitors should be received and treated with the +utmost courtesy. But if a tiresome fellow, after wearying all +his friends, becomes weary of himself, and arrives to bestow +his tediousness upon you, pull out your watch with +restlessness, talk about your great occupations and the value +of time. Politeness is one thing; to be made a convenience of +is another. + +The style of your conversation should always be in keeping +with the character of the visit. You must not talk about +literature in a visit of condolence, nor about political +economy in a visit of ceremony. + +When a lady visits you, upon her retiring, you offer her your +arm, and conduct her to her carriage. If you are visiting at +the same time with another lady, you should take leave at the +same time, and hand her into her carriage. + +After a hall, a dinner, or a concert, you visit during the +week. + +Pay the first visit to a friend just returned from a voyage. + +Annual visits are paid to persons with whom you have a cool +acquaintance, They visit you in the autumn, you return a card +in the spring. + +In paying a visit under ordinary circumstances, you leave a +single card. If there be residing in the family, a married +daughter, an unmarried sister, a transient guest, or any +person in a distinct situation from the mistress of the +house, you leave two cards, one for each party. If you are +acquainted with only one member of a family, as the husband, +or the wife, and you wish to indicate that your visit is to +both, you leave two cards. Ladies have a fashion of pinching +down one corner of a card to denote that the visit is to only +one of two parties in a house, and two corners, or one side +of the card, when the visit is to both; but this is a +transient mode, and of dubious respectability. + +If, in paying a morning visit, you are not recognized when +you enter, mention your name immediately. If you call to +visit one member, and you find others only in the parlour, +introduce yourself to them. Much awkwardness may occur +through defect of attention to this point. + +When a gentleman is about to be married, he sends cards, a +day or two before the event, to all whom he is in the habit +of visiting. These visits are never paid in person, but the +cards sent by a servant, at any hour in the morning; or the +gentleman goes in a carriage, and sends them in. After +marriage, some day is appointed and made known to all, as the +day on which he receives company. His friends then all call +upon him. Would that this also were performed by cards! + +CHAPTER VIII. APPOINTMENTS AND PUNCTUALITY. + +When you make an appointment, always be exact in observing +it. In some places, and on some occasions, a quarter of an +hour's _grace_ is given. This depends on custom, and it is +always better not to avail yourself of it. In Philadelphia it +is necessary to be punctual to a second, for there everybody +breathes by the State-house clock If you make an appointment +to meet anywhere, your body must be in a right line with the +frame of the door at the instant the first stroke of the +great clock sounds. If you are a moment later, your character +is gone. It is useless to plead the evidence of your watch, +or detention by a friend. You read your condemnation in the +action of the old fellows who, with polite regard to your +feelings, simultaneously pull out their vast chronometers, as +you enter. The tardy man is worse off than the murderer. _He_ +may be pardoned by one person, (the Governor); the unpunctual +is pardoned by none. _Haud inexpectus loquor._ + +If you make an appointment with another at your own house, +you should be invisible to the rest of the world, and +consecrate your time solely to him. + +If you make an appointment with a lady, especially if it be +upon a promenade, or other public place, you must be there a +little before the time. + +If you accept an appointment at the house of a public +officer, or a man of business, be very punctual, transact the +affair with despatch, and retire the moment it is finished. + +CHAPTER IX. DINNER. + +The hour of dinner has been said, by Dr. Johnson, to be the +most important hour in civilized life. The etiquette of the +dinner-table has a prominence commensurate with the dignity +of the ceremony. Like the historian of Peter Bell, we +commence at the commencement, and thence proceed to the +moment when you take leave officially, or vanish unseen. + +In order to dine, the first requisite is--to be invited. The +length of time which the invitation precedes the dinner is +always proportioned to the grandeur of the occasion, and +varies from two days to two weeks. To an invitation received +less than two days in advance, you will lose little by +replying in the negative, for as it was probably sent as soon +as the preparations of the host commenced, you may be sure +that there will be little on the table fit to eat. Those +abominations, y'clept "plain family dinners," eschew like the +plague. + +You reply to a note of invitation immediately, and in the +most direct and unequivocal terms. If you accept, you arrive +at the house rigorously at the hour specified. It is equally +inconvenient to be too late and to be too early. If you fall +into the latter error, you find every thing in disorder; the +master of the house is in his dressing-room, changing his +waistcoat; the lady is still in the pantry; the fire not yet +lighted in the parlour. If by accident or thoughtlessness you +arrive too soon, you may pretend that you called to inquire +the exact hour at which they dine, having mislaid the note, +and then retire to walk for an appetite. If you are too late, +the evil is still greater, and indeed almost without a +remedy. Your delay spoils the dinner and destroys the +appetite and temper of the guests; and you yourself are so +much embarrassed at the inconvenience you have occasioned, +that you commit a thousand errors at table. If you do not +reach the house until dinner is served, you had better retire +to a restaurateurs, and thence send an apology, and not +interrupt the harmony of the courses by awkward excuses and +cold acceptances. + +When the guests have all entered, and been presented to one +another, if any delay occurs, the conversation should be of +the lightest and least exciting kind; mere common-places +about the weather and late arrivals. You should not amuse the +company by animated relations of one person who has just cut +his throat from ear to ear, or of another who, the evening +before, was choked by a tough beef-steak and was buried that +morning. + +When dinner is announced, the inviter rises and requests all +to walk to the dining-room. He then leads the way, that they +may not be at a loss to know whither they should proceed. +Each gentleman offers his arm to a lady, and they follow in +solemn order. + +The great distinction now becomes evident between the host +and the guests, which distinction it is the chief effort of +good breeding to remove. To perform faultlessly the honours +of the table, is one of the most difficult things in society: +it might indeed be asserted without much fear of +contradiction, that no man has as yet ever reached exact +propriety in his office as host, has hit the mean between +exerting himself too much and too little. His great business +is to put every one entirely at his ease, to gratify all his +desires, and make him, in a word, absolutely contented with +men and things. To accomplish this, he must have the genius +of tact to perceive, and the genius of finesse to execute; +ease and frankness of manner; a knowledge of the world that +nothing can surprise; a calmness of temper that nothing can +disturb, and a kindness of disposition that can never be +exhausted. When he receives others, he must be content to +forget himself; he must relinquish all desire to shine, and +even all attempts to please his guests by conversation, and +rather, do all in his power to let them please one another. +He behaves to them without agitation, without affectation; he +pays attention without an air of protection; he encourages +the timid, draws out the silent, and directs conversation +without Sustaining it himself. He who does not do all this, +is wanting in his duty as host; he who does, is more than +mortal. + +When all are seated, the gentleman at the head of the table +sends soup to every one, from the pile of plates which stand +at his right hand. He helps the person at his right hand +first, and at his left next, and so through the whole. + +There are an immensity of petty usages at the dinner table, +such as those mentioned in the story of the Abb, Delille and +the Abb, Cossen in the Introduction to this volume, which it +would be trifling and tedious to enumerate hers, and which +will be learned by an observing man after assisting at two or +three dinners. + +You should never ask a gentleman or lady at the table to help +you to any thing, but always apply to the servants. + +Your first duty at the table is to attend to the wants of the +lady who sits next to you, the second, to attend to your own. +In performing the first, you should take care that the lady +has all that she wishes, yet without appearing to direct your +attention too much to her plate, for nothing is more ill-bred +than to watch a person eating. If the lady be something of a +_gourmande,_ and in ever-zealous pursuit of the aroma of the +wing of a pigeon, should raise an unmanageable portion to her +mouth, you should cease all conversation with her, and look +steadfastly into the opposite part of the room. + +In France, a dish, after having been placed upon the table +for approval, is removed by the servants, and carved at a +sideboard, and after. wards handed to each in succession. +This is extremely convenient, and worthy of acceptation in +this country. But unfortunately it does not as yet prevail +here. Carving therefore becomes an indispensable branch of a +gentleman's education. You should no more think of going to a +dinner without a knowledge of this art, than you should think +of going without your shoes. The gentleman of the house +selects the various dishes in the order in which they should +be cut, and invites some particular one to perform the +office. It is excessively awkward to be obliged to decline, +yet it is a thing too often occurring in,his country. When +you carve, you should never rise from your seat. + +Some persons, in helping their guests, or recommending dishes +to their taste, preface every such action with an eulogy on +its merits, and draw every bottle of wine with an account of +its virtues. Others, running into the contrary extreme, +regret or fear that each dish is not exactly as it should be; +that the cook, etc., etc. Both of these habits are grievous +errors. You should leave it to your guests alone to approve, +or suffer one of your intimate friends who is present, to +vaunt your wine. When you draw a bottle, merely state its age +and brand, and of what particular vintage it is. + +Do not insist upon your guests partaking of particular +dishes, never ask persons more than once, and never put +anything by force upon their plates. It is extremely ill- +bred, though extremely common, to press one to eat of +anything. You should do all that you can to make your guests +feel themselves at home, which they never can do while you +are so constantly forcing upon their minds the recollection +of the difference between yourself and them. You should never +send away your own plate until all your guests have finished. + +Before the cloth is removed you do not drink wine unless with +another. If you are asked to take wine it is uncivil to +refuse. When you drink with another, you catch the person's +eye and bow with politeness. It is not necessary to say +anything, but smile with an air of great kindness. + +Some one who sits near the lady of the house, should, +immediately upon the removal of the soup, request the honor +of drinking wine with her, which movement is the signal for +all the others. If this is not done, the master of the house +should select some lady. _He_ never asks gentlemen, but they +ask him; this is a refined custom, attended to in the best +company. + +If you have drunk with every one at the table, and wish more +wine, you must wait till the cloth is removed. The decanter +is then sent round from the head of the table, each person +fills his glass, and all the company drinks the Health of all +the company. It is enough if you bow to the master and +mistress of the house, and to your opposite neighbour. After +this the ladies retire. Some one rises to open the door for +them, and they go into the parlour, the gentlemen remaining +to drink more wine. + +After the ladies have retired, the service of the decanters +is done. The host draws the bottles which have been standing +in a wine cooler since the commencement of the dinner. The +bottle goes down the left side and up the right, and the same +bottle never passes twice. If you do not drink, always pass +the bottle to your neighbour. + +At dinner never call for ale or porter; it is coarse, and +injures the taste for wine. + +It was formerly the custom to drink _porter_ with cheese. One +of the few real improvements introduced by the "Napoleon of +the realms of fashion" was to banish this tavern liquor and +substitute _port._ The dictum of Brummell was thus +enunciated: "A gentleman never _malts,_ he _ports._" + +A gentleman should always express his preference for some one +sort of wine over others; because, as there is always a +natural preference for one kind, if you say that you are +indifferent, you show that you are not accustomed to drink +wines. Your preference should not of course be guided by your +real disposition; if you are afflicted by nature with a +partiality for port, you should never think of indulging it +except in your closet with your chamber-door locked. The only +index of choice is fashion;--either permanent fashion (if the +phrase may be used), or some temporary fashion created by the +custom of any individual who happens to rule for a season in +society. Port was drunk by our ancestors, but George the +Fourth, upon his accession to the regency, announced his +royal preference for sherry. It has since been fashionable to +like sherry. This is what we call a _permanent_ fashion. + +Champagne wine is drunk after the removal of the first cloth; +that is to say, between the meats and the dessert. One +servant goes round and places before each guest a proper- +shaped glass; another follows and fills them, and they are +immediately drunk. Sometimes this is done twice in +succession. The bottle does not again make its appearance, +and it would excite a stare to ask at a later period for a +glass of champagne wine. + +If you should happen to be blessed with those rely nuisances, +children, and should be entertaining company, never allow +them to be brought in after dinner, unless they are +particularly asked for, and even then it is better to say +they are at school. Some persons, with the intention of +paying their court to the father, express great desire to see +the sons; but they should have some mercy upon the rest of +the party, particularly as they know that they themselves +would be the most disturbed of all, if their urgent entreaty +was granted. + +Never at any time, whether at a formal or a familiar dinner +party, commit the impropriety of talking to a servant: nor +ever address any remark about one of them to one of the +party. Nothing can be more ill-bred. You merely ask for what +you want in a grave and civil tone, and wait with patience +till your order is obeyed. + +It is a piece of refined coarseness to employ the fingers +instead of the fork to effect certain operations at the +dinner table, and on some other similar occasions. To know +how and when to follow the fashion of Eden, and when that of +more civilized life, is one of the many points which +distinguish a gentleman from one not a gentleman; or rather, +in this case, which shows the difference between a man of the +world, and one who has not "the tune of the time."* Cardinal +Richelieu detected an adventurer who passed himself off for a +nobleman, by his helping himself to olives with a fork. He +might have applied the test to a vast many other things. Yet, +on the other hand, a gentleman would lose his reputation, if +he were to take up a piece of sugar with his fingers and not +with the sugar-tongs. + +* Shakspeare + +It is of course needless to say that your own knife should +never be brought near to the butter, or salt, or to a dish of +any kind. If, however, a gentleman should send his plate for +anything near you, and a knife cannot be obtained +immediately, you may skillfully avoid all censure by using +_his_ knife to procure it. + +When you send your plate for anything, you leave your knife +and fork upon it, crossed. When you have done, you lay both +in parallel lines on one side. A render who occupies himself +about greater matters, may smile at this precept. It may, +indeed, be very absurd, yet such is the tyranny of custom, +that if you were to cross your knife and fork when you have +finished, the most reasonable and strong-minded man at the +table could not help setting you down, in his own mind, as a +low-bred person. _Magis sequor quam probo._ + +The chief matter of consideration at the dinner table, as +indeed everywhere else in the life of a gentleman, is to be +perfectly composed and at his ease. He speaks deliberately, +he performs the most important act of the day as if he were +performing the most ordinary. Yet there is no appearance of +trifling or want of gravity in his manner; he maintains the +dignity which is becoming on so vital an occasion. He +performs all the ceremonies, yet in the style of one who +performs no _ceremony_ at all. He goes through all the +complicated duties of the scene, as if he were "to the manner +born." + +Some persons, who cannot draw the nice distinction between +too much and too little, desiring to be particularly +respectable, make a point of appearing unconcerned and quite +indifferent to enjoyment at dinner. Such conduct not only +exhibits a want of sense and a profane levity, but is in the +highest degree rude to your obliging host. He has taken a +great deal of trouble to give you pleasure, and it is your +business to be, or at least to appear, pleased. It is one +thing, indeed, to stare and wonder, and to ask for all the +delicacies on the table in the style of a person who had +lived all his life behind a counter, but it is quite another +to throw into your manner the spirit and gratified air of a +man who is indeed not unused to such matters, but who yet +esteems them at their fall value. + +When the Duke of Wellington was at Paris, as commander of the +allied armies, he was invited to dine with Cambaceres, one of +the most distinguished statesmen and _gourmands_ of the time +of Napoleon. In the course of the dinner, his host having +helped him to some particularly _recherche_ dish, expressed a +hope that he found it agreeable. "Very good," said the hero +of Waterloo, who was probably speculating upon what he would +have done if Blucher had not come up: "Very good; but I +really do not care what I eat." "Good God!" exclaimed +Cambaceres,--as he started back and dropped his fork, quite +"frighted from his propriety,"--"Don't care what you eat! +What _did_ you come here for, then?" + +After the wine is finished, you retire to the drawing-room, +where the ladies are assembled; the master of the house +rising first from the table, but going out of the room last. +If you wish to go before this, you must vanish unseen. + +We conclude this chapter by a word of important counsel to +the host:--Never make an apology. + +CHAPTER X. TRAVELLING. + +It is an extremely difficult affair to travel in a coach, +with perfect propriety. Ten to one the person next to you is +an English nobleman _incognito_; and a hundred to one, the +man opposite to you is a brute or a knave. To behave so that +you may not be uncivil to the one, nor a dupe to the other, +is an art of some niceness. + +As the seats are assigned to passengers in the order in which +they are booked, you should send to have your place taken a +day or two before the journey, so that you may be certain of +a back seat. It is also advisable to arrive at the place of +departure early, so that you assume your place without +dispute. + +When women appear at the door of the coach to obtain +admittance, it is a matter of some question to know exactly +what conduct it is necessary to pursue. If the women are +servants, or persons in a low rank of life, I do not see upon +what ground of politeness or decency you are called upon to +yield your seat. _Etiquette,_ and the deference due to ladies +have, of course, no operation in the case of such persons. +Chivalry--(and the gentleman is the legitimate descendant of +the knight of old)--was ever a devotion to rank rather than +to sex. Don Quixotte, or Sir Piercy Shafestone would not +willingly have given place to servant girls. And upon +considerations of humanity and regard to weakness, the case +is no stronger. Such people have nerves considerably more +robust than you have, and are quite as capable of riding +backwards, or the top, as yourself. The only reason for +_politeness_ in the case is, that perhaps the other +passengers are of the same standing with the women, and might +eject you from the window if you refuse to give place. + +If _ladies_ enter--and a gentleman distinguishes them in an +instant--the case is altered. The sooner you move the better +is it for yourself, since the rest will in the end have to +concede, and you will give yourself a reputation among the +party and secure a better seat, by rising at once. + +The principle that guides you in society is politeness; that +which guides you in a coach is good humour. You lay aside all +attention to form, and all strife after effect, and take +instead, kindness of disposition and a willingness to please. +You pay a constant regard to the comfort of your. fellow- +prisoners. You take care not to lean upon the shoulder of +your neighbour when you sleep. You are attentive not to make +the stage wait for you at the stopping-places. When the +ladies get out, you offer them your arm, and you do the same +when the coachman is driving rapidly over a rough place. You +should make all the accommodations to others, which you can +do consistently with your own convenience; for, after all, +the individuals are each like little nations; and as, in the +one case, the first duty is to your country, so in the other, +the first duty is to yourself. + +Some surly creatures, upon entering a coach, wrap about their +persons a great coat of cloth, and about their minds a mantle +of silence, which are not thrown off during the whole +journey. This is doing more harm to themselves than to +others. You should make a point of conversing with an +appearance of entire freedom, though with real reserve, with +all those who are so disposed. + +One purpose and pleasure of travelling is to gain +information, and to observe the various characters of +persons. You will be asked by others about the road you +passed over, and it will be awkward if you can give no +account of it. Converse, therefore, with all. Relate amusing +stories, chiefly of other countries, and even of other times, +so as not to offend any one. If engaged in discussion--and a +coach is almost the only place where discussion should _not_ +be avoided--state facts and arguments rather than opinions. +Never answer impudent questions-and never ask them. + +At the meals which occur during a journey, you see beautiful +exemplification of the _dictum_ of Hobbes, "that war is the +natural state of man." The entire scene is one of +unintermitted war of every person with every other person, +with the viands, and with good manners. You open your mouth +only to admit edibles and to bellow to the waiters. Your sole +object is yourself. You drink wine without asking your +neighbour to join you; and if he should be so silly as to ask +you to hand him some specified dish, you blandly comply; but +in the passage to him, you transfer the whole of its contents +to your own plate. There is no halving in these matters. +Rapacity, roaring, and rapidity are the three requisites for +dining during a journey. When you have resumed your seat in +the coach, you are as bland as a morning in spring. + +Never assume any unreal importance in a stage-coach, founded +on the ignorance of your fellows, and their inability to +detect it. It is excessively absurd, and can only gratify a +momentary and foolish vanity; for, whenever you might make +use of your importance, you would probably be at once +discovered. There is an admirable paper upon this point in +one of Johnson's Adventurers. + +The friendship which has subsisted between travellers +terminates with the journey. When you get out, a word, a bow, +and the most unpleasant act of life is finished and +forgotten. + +CHAPTER XI. BALLS. + +Invitations to a ball should be issued at least ten days in +advance, in order to give an opportunity to the men to clear +away engagements; and to women, time to prepare the artillery +of their toilet. Cards of invitation should be sent--not +notes. + +Upon the entrance of ladies, or persons entitled to +deference, the master of the house precedes them across the +room: he addresses compliments to them, and will lose his +life to procure them seats. + +While dancing with a lady whom you have never seen before, +you should not talk to her much. + +The master of the ceremonies must take care that every lady +dances, and press into service for that purpose these young +gentlemen who are hanging round the room like fossils. If +desired by him to dance with a particular lady you should +refuse on no account. + +If you have no ear, that is, a false one, never dance. + +To usurp the seat of a person who is dancing is the height of +incivility. + +Never go to a public ball. + +CHAPTER XII. FUNERALS. + +When any member of a family is dead, it is customary to send +intelligence of the misfortune to all who have been connected +with the deceased in relations of business or friendship. The +letters which are sent contain a special invitation to assist +at the funeral. + +An invitation of this sort should never he refused, though, +of course, you do not send a reply, for no other reason that +I know of, excepting the impossibility of framing any formula +of acceptance. + +You render yourself at the house an hour or two after the +time specified. If you were to sit long in the mournful +circle you might be rendered unfit for doing any thing for a +week. + +Your dress is black, and during the time of waiting you +compose your visage into a "tristful 'haviour," and lean in +silent solemnity upon the top of your cane, thinking about-- +last night's party. This is a necessary hypocrisy, and +assists marvellously the sadness of the ceremony. You walk in +a procession with the others, your carriage following in the +street. The first places are yielded to the relations of the +deceased. + +The coffins of persons of distinction are carried in the +hands of bearers, who walk with their hats off. + +You walk with another, in seemly order, and converse in a low +tone; first upon the property of the defunct, and next upon +the politics of the day. You walk with the others into the +church, where service is said over the body. It is optional +to go to the grave or not. When you go away, you enter your +carriage and return to your business or your pleasures. + +A funeral in the morning, a ball in the evening,"--so runs +the world away." + +CHAPTER XIII. SERVANTS. + +Servants are a necessary evil. He who shall contrive to +obviate their necessity, or remove their inconveniences, will +render to human comfort a greater benefit than has yet been +conferred by all the useful-knowledge societies of the age. +They are domestic spies, who continually embarrass the +intercourse of the members of a family, or possess themselves +of private information that renders their presence hateful, +and their absence dangerous. It is a rare thing to see +persons who are not controlled by their servants. Theirs, +too, is not the only kitchen cabinet which begins by serving +and ends by ruling. + +If we judge from the frequency and inconvenience of an +opposite course, we should say that the most important +precept to be observed is, never to be afraid of your +servants. We have known many ladies who, without any reason +in the world, lived in a state of perfect subjugation to +their servants, who were afraid to give a direction, and who +submitted to disobedience and insult, where no danger could +be apprehended from discharging them. + +If a servant offends you by any trifling or occasional +omission of duty, reprove the fault with mild severity; if +the error be repeated often, and be of a gross description, +never hesitate, but discharge the servant instantly, without +any altercation of language. You cannot easily find another +who will serve you worse. + +As for those precautions which are ordinarily taken, to +secure the procurence of good servants, they are, without +exception, utterly useless. The author of the Rambler has +remarked, that a written _character_ of a servant is worth +about as much as a discharge from the Old Bailey. I never, +but once, took any trouble to inquire what reputation a +servant had held in former situations. On that occasion, I +heard that I had engaged the very Shakespeare of menials,-- +Aristides was not more honest,--Zeno more truth-telling,--nor +Abdiel more faithful. This fellow, after insulting me daily +for a week, disappeared with my watch and three pair of +boots. + +Those offices which profess to recommend good domestics, are +"bosh,--nothing." In nine cases out of ten, the keepers are +in league with the servants; and in the tenth, ignorance, +dishonesty, or carelessness will prevent any benefit +resulting from,their "intelligence." All that you can do is, +to take the most decent creature who applies; trust in +Providence, and lock every thing up. + +Never speak harshly, or superciliously, or hastily to a +servant. There are many little actions which distinguish, to +the eye of the most careless observer, a gentleman from one +not a gentleman; but there is none more striking than the +manner of addressing a servant. Issue your commands with +gravity and gentleness, and in a reserved manner. Let your +voice be composed, but avoid a tone of familiarity or +sympathy with them. It is better in addressing them to use a +higher key of voice, and not to suffer it to fall at the end +of a sentence. The best bred man whom we ever had the +pleasure of meeting, always employed, in addressing servants, +such forms of speech as these--"I'll thank you for so and +so,"--" Such a thing, if you please,"--with a gentle tone, +but very elevated key. The perfection of manner, in this +particular, is, to indicate by your language, that the +performance is a favour, and by your tone that it is a matter +of course. + +While, however, you practise the utmost mildness and +forbearance in your language, avoid the dangerous and common +error of exercising too great humanity in action. No servant, +from the time of the first Gibeonite downwards, has ever had +too much labour imposed upon him; while thousands have been +ruined by the mistaken kindness of their masters. + +Servants should always be allowed, and indeed directed, to go +to church on Sunday afternoon. For this purpose, dinner is +served earlier on that day than usual. If it can be +accomplished, the servants should be induced to attend the +same church as the family with whom they live; because there +may be reason to fear that if they profess to go elsewhere, +they may not go to church at all; and the habit of wandering +about the streets with idlers, will speedily ruin the best +servant that ever stood behind a chair. + +Servants should be directed to announce visitors. This is +always done abroad, and is a convenient custom. + +Never allow a female servant to enter a parlour. If all the +male domestics are gone out, it is better that there should +be no attendance at all. + +Some ladies are in the habit of amusing their friends with +accounts of the difficulty of getting good servants, etc. +This denotes decided ill breeding. Such subjects should never +be made topics of conversation. + +If a servant offends you by any grossness of conduct, never +rebuke the offence upon the spot, nor indeed notice it at all +at the time; for you cannot do it without anger, and without +giving rise to a _scene._ Prince Puckler Muskaw was, very +properly, turned out of the Travellers' Club for throwing a +fork at one of the waiters. + +In the house of another, or when there is any company present +in your own, never converse with the servants. This most +vulgar, but not uncommon, habit, is judiciously censured in +that best of novels,--the Zeluco of Dr. Moore. + +CHAPTER XIV. FASHION. + +Fashion is a tyranny founded only on assumption. The +principle upon which its influence rests, is one deeply based +in the human heart, and one which has long been observed and +long practised upon in every department of life. In the +literary, the religious, and the political world, it has been +an assured and very profitable conclusion, that the public, + +"Like women, born to be controlled, Stoops to the forward and +the bold." + +"Qui sibi fidit, dux regit examen," is a maxim of universal +truth. Pococurante, in Candide, was admired for despising +Homer and Michel Angelo; he would have gained little +distinction by praising them. The judicious application of +this rule to society, is the origin of fashion. In despair of +attaining greatness of quality, it founds its distinction +only on peculiarity. + +We have spoken elsewhere of those complex and very rare +accomplishments, whose union is requisite to constitute a +gentleman. We know of but one quality which is demanded for a +man of fashion,--impudence. An impudence (self-confidence +"the wise it call") as impenetrable as the gates of +Pandemonium--a coolness and imperturbability of self- +admiration, which the boaster in Spencer might envy--a +contempt of every decency, as such, and an utter +imperviousness to ridicule,--these are the amiable and +dignified qualities which serve to rear an empire over the +weakness and cowardice of men. + +To define the character of that which is changing even while +we survey it, is a task of no small difficulty. We imagine +that there is only one means by which it may be always +described, viz., that it consists in an entire avoidance of +all that is natural and rational. Its essence is affectation; +effeminacy takes the place of manliness; drawling stupidity, +of wit; stiffness and hauteur, of ease and civility; and +self-illustration, of a decent and respectful regard to +others. + +A man of fashion must never allow himself to be pleased. +Nothing is more decidedly _de mauvais ton_ than any +expression of delight. He must never laugh, nor, unless his +penetration is very great, must he even smile; for he might +by ignorance smile at the wrong place or time. All real +emotion is to be avoided; all sympathy with the great or the +beautiful is to be shunned; yet the liveliest feeling may be +exhibited upon the death of a poodle-dog. + +At the house of an acquaintance, he must never praise, nor +even look, at the pictures, the carpets, the curtains, or the +ottomans, because if he did, it might be supposed that he was +not accustomed to such things. + +About two years ago, it began to be considered improper to +pay compliments to women, because if they are not paid +gracefully they are awkward, and to pay them gracefully is +difficult. At the present time it is considered dangerous to +a man's pretensions to fashion, in England, to speak to women +at all. Women are voted bores, and are to be treated with +refined rudeness. + +There is no possible system of manners that will serve to +exhibit at once the uncivility and the high refinement which +should characterize the man of fashion. He must therefore +have no manners at all. He must behave with tame and passive +insolence, never breaking into active effrontery excepting +towards unprotected women and clergymen. Persons of no +importance he does not see, and is not conscious of their +existence; those who have the same standing, he treats with +easy scorn, and he acknowledges the distinction of superiors +only by patronizing and protecting them. A man of fashion +does not despise wealth; he cannot but think _that_ valuable +which procures to others the honour of paying for his +suppers. + +Fashion is so completely distinguished from good breeding, +that it is even opposed to it. It is in fact a system of +refined vulgarity. What, for example can be more vulgar than +incessantly _talkin_g about forms and customs? About silver +forks and French soup? A gentleman follows these conventional +habits; but he follows them as matters of course. He looks +upon them as the ordinary and essential customs of refined +society. French forks are to him things as indispensable as a +table-cloth; and he thinks it as unnecessary to insist upon +the one as upon the other. If he sees a person who eats with +his knife, he concludes that that person is ignorant of the +usages of the world, but he does not shriek and faint away +like a Bond-street dandy. If he dines at a table where there +are no silver forks, he eats his dinner in perfect propriety +with steel, and exhibits, neither by manner nor by speech, +that he perceives any error. To be sure, he forms his own +opinion about the rank of his entertainer, but he leaves it +to such new-made gentry as Mr. Theodore Hook, in his vulgar +fashionable novels, to harangue about such delinquencies. The +vulgarity of insisting upon these matters is scarcely less +offensive than the vulgarity of neglecting them. Lady Frances +Pelham is but one remove better than a Brancton. + +A man of fashion never goes to the theatre; he is waiting for +the opera. + +He, of course, goes out of town in the summer; or, if he +cannot afford to do so, he merely closes his window-shutters, +and appears to be gone. + +Fashion makes all great things little, and all little things +great. + +It is commonly said, that it requires more wit to perform the +part of the fool in a farce than that of the master. Without +intending any offence to the fool by the comparison, we may +remark, that qualities of an elevated character are required +for the support of the _rol_e of a man of fashion in the +solemn farce of life. He must have invention, to vary his +absurdities when they cease to be striking; he must have wit +enough to obtain the reputation of a great deal more; and he +must possess tact to know when and where to crouch, and where +and when to insult. + +Brummel, whose career is one of the most extraordinary on +record, must have exercised, during the period of his social +reign, many qualities of conduct which rank among the highest +endowments of our race. For an obscure individual, without +fortune or rank, to have conceived the idea of placing +himself at the head of society in a country the most +thoroughly aristocratic in Europe, relying too upon no other +weapon than well-directed insolence; for the same individual +to have triumphed splendidly over the highest and the +mightiest--to have maintained a contest with royalty itself, +and to have come off victorious even in that struggle--for +such an one no ordinary faculties must have been demanded. Of +the sayings of Brummel which have been preserved, it is +difficult to distinguish whether they contain real wit, or +are only so sublimely and so absurdly impudent that they look +like witty. + +We add here a few anecdotes of Brummel, which will serve to +show, better than any precepts, the style of conduct which a +man of fashion may pursue. + +When Brummel was at the height of his power, he was once, in +the company of some gentlemen, speaking of the Prince of +Wales as a very good sort of man, who behaved himself very +decently, _considering circumstances_; some one present +offered a wager that he would not dare to give a direction to +this very good sort of man. Brummel looked astonished at the +remark, and declined accepting a wager upon such point. They +happened to be dining with the regent the next-day, and after +being pretty well fortified. with wine, Brummel interrupted a +remark of the prince's, by exclaiming very mildly and +naturally, "Wales, ring the bell!" His royal highness +immediately obeyed the command, and when the servant entered, +said to him, with the utmost coolness and firmness, "Show Mr. +Brummel to his carriage." The dandy was not in the least +dejected by his expulsion; but meeting the prince regent, +walking with a gentleman, the next day in the street, he did +not bow to him, but stopping the other, drew him aside and +said, in a loud whisper, "Who is that FAT FRIEND of ours?" It +must be remembered that the object of this sarcasm was at +that time exceedingly annoyed by his increasing corpulency; +so manifestly so, that Sheridan remarked, that "though the +regent professed himself a Whig, he believed that in his +heart he was no friend to _new measures._" + +Shortly after this occurrence at Carlton-House, Brummel +remarked to one of his friends, that "he had half a mind to +cut the young one, and bring old George into fashion." + +In describing a short visit which he had paid to a nobleman +in the country, he said, that he had only carried with him a +night-cap and a silver basin to spit in, "Because, you know, +it is utterly impossible to spit in clay." + +Brummel was once present at a party to which he had not been +invited. After he had been some time in the room, the +gentleman of the house, willing to mortify him, went up to +him and said that he believed that there must be some +mistake, as he did not recollect having had the honour of +sending him an invitation. "What is the name?" said the other +very drawlingly, at the same time affecting to feel in his +waistcoat pocket for a card. "Johnson," replied the +gentleman. "Jauhnson?" said Brummel, "oh! I remember now that +the name was Thaunson (Thompson); and Jauhnson and Thaunson, +Thaunson and Jauhnson, you know, are so much the same kind of +thing." + +Brummel was once asked how much a year he thought would be +required to keep a single man in clothes. "Why, with +tolerable economy," said he, "I think it might be done for +L800." + +He once went down to a gentleman's house in the country, +without having been asked to do so. He was given to +understand, the next morning, that his absence would be more +agreeable, and he took his departure. Some one having heard +of his discomfiture, asked him how he liked the +accommodations there. He replied coolly, that "it was a very +decent house to spend a single night in." + +We have mentioned that this dreaded arbiter of modes had +threatened that he would put the prince regent out of +fashion. Alas! for the peace of the British monarch, this was +not an idle boast. His dangerous rival resolved in the +unfathomable recesses of a mind capacious of such things, to +commence and to carry on a war whose terror and grandeur +should astound society, to administer to audacious royalty a +lesson which should never be forgotten, and finally to +retire, when retire he must, with mementos of his tremendous +power around him, and with the mightiest of the earth at his +feet. Inventive and deliberate were the counsels which he +meditated; sublime and resolute was the conduct he adopted. +He decided, with an originality of genius to which the +conqueror of Marengo might have vailed, that the _neck_ of +the foe was the point at which the first fatal shaft of his +excommunicating ire should be hurled. With rapid and decisive +energy he concentrated all his powers for instantaneous +action. He retired for a day to the seclusion of solitude, to +summon and to spur the energies of the most self-reliant mind +in Europe, as the lion draws back to gather courage for the +leap. As, like the lion, he drew back; so, like the lion, did +he spring forward upon his prey. At a ball given by the +Duchess of Devonshire, when the whole assembly were +conversing upon his supposed disgrace, and insulting by their +malevolence one whom they had disgusted by their adulation, +Brummel suddenly stood in the midst of them. Could it be +indeed Brummel? Could it be mortal who thus appeared with +such an encincture of radiant glory about his neck? Every eye +was upon him, fixed in stupid admiration; every tongue, as it +slowly recovered from its speechless paralysis, faltered +forth "what a cravat!" What a cravat indeed! Hundreds that +had, a moment before, exulted in unwonted freedom, bowed +before it with the homage of servile adoration. What a +cravat! There it stood; there was no doubting its entity, no +believing it an illusion. There it stood, smooth and stiff, +yet light and almost transparent; delicate as the music of +Ariel, yet firm as the spirit of Regulus; bending with the +grace of Apollo's locks, yet erect with the majesty of the +Olympian Jove: without a wrinkle, without an indentation. +What a cravat! The regent "saw and shook;" and uttering a +faint gurgle from beneath the wadded bag which surrounded his +royal thorax, he was heard to whisper with dismay, "D--n him! +what a cravat!" The triumph was complete. + +It is stated, upon what authority we know not, that his royal +highness, after passing a sleepless night in vain +conjectures, despatched at an early hour, one of his privy- +counsellors to Brummel, offering _carte blanche_ if he would +disclose the secret of that mysterious cravat. But the +"_atrox animus Catonis_" disdained the bribe. He preferred +being supplicated, to being bought, by kings. "Go," said he +to the messenger, with the spirit of Marius mantling in his +veins, "Go, and tell _you_r master that you have seen _his_ +master." + +For the truth of another anecdote, connected with this +cravat, we have indisputable evidence. A young nobleman of +distinguished talents and high pretensions as to fortune and +rank, saw this fatal band, and eager to advance himself in +the rolls of fashion, retired to his chamber to endeavour to +penetrate the method of its construction. He tried every sort +of known, and many sorts of unknown stiffeners to accomplish +the end--paper and pasteboard, and wadding, shavings, and +shingles, and planks,--all were vainly experienced. Gargantua +could not have exhibited a greater invention of expedients +than he did; but vainly. After a fortnight of the closest +application, ardour of study and anxiety of mind combined, +brought him to the brink of the grave. His mother having +ascertained the origin of his complaint, waited upon Brummel, +who was the only living man that could remove it. She +implored him, by every human motive, to say but one word, to +save the life of her son and prevent her own misery. But the +tyrant was immoveable, and the young man expired a victim of +his sternness. + +When, at length, yielding to that strong necessity which no +man can control, Brummel was obliged, like Napoleon, to +abdicate, the mystery of that mighty cravat was unfolded. +There was found, after his departure to Calais, written on +sheet of paper upon his table, the following epigram of +scorn: "STARCH IS THE MAN." The cravat of Brummel was merely- +-starched! Henceforth starch was introduced into every cravat +in Europe. + +Brummel still lives, an obscure consul in a petty European +town. + +Physically there is something to command our admiration in +the history of a man who thus lays at his mercy all ranks of +men,--the lofty and the low, the great, the powerful and the +vain: but morally and seriously, no character is more +despicable than that of the mere man of fashion, Seeking +nothing but notoriety, his path to that end is over the ruins +of all that is worthy in our nature. He knows virtue only to +despise it; he makes himself acquainted with human feelings +only to outrage them. He commences his career beyond the +limits of decency, and ends it far in the regions of infamy. +Feared by all and respected by none, hated by his worshippers +and despised by himself, he rules,--an object of pity and +contempt: and when his power is past, his existence is +forgotten; he lives on in an, oblivion which is to him worse +than death, and the stings of memory goad him to the grave. + +The devotee of fashion is a trifler unworthy of his race; the +_mere_ gentleman is a character which may in time become +somewhat tiresome; there is a just mean between the two, +where a better conduct than either is to be found. It is that +of a man who, yielding to others, still maintains his self- +respect, and whose concessions to folly are controlled by +good sense; who remembers the value of trifles without +forgetting the importance of duties, and resolves so to +regulate his conduct that neither others may be offended by +his stiffness, nor himself have to regret his levity. + +Live therefore among men--to conclude our homily after the +manner of Quarles--live therefore among men, like them, yet +not disliking thyself; and let the hues of fashion be +reflected from thee, but let them not enter and colour thee +within. + +CHAPTER VIII. MISCELLANEOUS. + +There is nothing more ill bred in the world than continual +talking about good breeding. + +You should never employ the word "_genteel_;" the proper word +is "_respectable._" + +If you are walking down the street with another person on +your arm, and stop to say something to one of your friends, +do not commit the too common and most awkward error of +introducing such persons to one another. Never introduce +morning visitors, who happen to meet in your parlour without +being acquainted. If _you_ should be so introduced, remember +that the acquaintance afterwards goes for nothing: you have +not the slightest right to expect that the other should ever +speak to you. + +If you wish to be introduced to a lady, you must always have +her consent previously asked; this formality it is not +necessary to observe in the case of gentlemen alone. + +Presents are the gauge of friendship. They also serve to +increase it, and give it permanence. + +Among friends presents ought to be made of things of small +value; or, if valuable, their worth should be derived from +the style of the workmanship, or from some accidental +circumstance, rather than from the inherent and solid +richness. Especially never offer to a lady a gift of great +cost: it is in the highest degree indelicate, and looks as if +you were desirous of placing her under an obligation to you, +and of buying her good will. The gifts made by ladies to +gentlemen are of the most refined nature possible: they +should be little articles not purchased, but deriving a +priceless value as being the offspring of their gentle skill; +a little picture from their pencil, or a trifle from their +needle. + +To persons much your superiors, or gentlemen whom you do not +know intimately, there is but one species of appropriate +present--game. + +If you make a present, and it is praised by the receiver, you +should not yourself commence undervaluing it. If one is +offered to you, always accept it; and however small it may +be, receive it with civil and expressed thanks, without any +kind of affectation. Avoid all such deprecatory phrases, as +"I fear I rob you," etc. + +To children, the only presents which you offer are sugar- +plums and bon-bons. + +Avoid the habit of employing French words in English +conversation; it is in extremely bad taste to be always +employing such expressions as _ci-devant,_ _soi-disant,_ _en +masse,_ _couleur de rose,_ etc. Do not salute your +acquaintances with _bon jour,_ nor reply to every +proposition, _volontiers._ + +In speaking of French cities and towns, it is a mark of +refinement in education to pronounce them rigidly according +to English rules of speech. Mr. Fox, the best French scholar, +and one of the best bred men in England, always sounded the x +in _Bourdeaux,_ and the s in Calais, and on all occasions +pronounced such names just as they are written. + +In society, avoid having those peculiar preferences for some +subjects, which are vulgarly denominated. "_hobby horses._" +They make your company a _bore_ to all your friends; and some +kind-hearted creature will take advantage of them and _trot_ +you, for the amusement of the company. + +A certain degree of reserve, or the appearance of it, should +be maintained in your intercourse with your most intimate +friends. To ordinary acquaintances retain the utmost reserve- +-never allowing them to read your feelings, not, on the other +hand, attempting to take any liberties with them. Familiarity +of manner is the greatest vice of society. "Ah! allow me, my +dear fellow," says a rough voice, and at the same moment a +thumb and finger are extended into my snuff-box, which, in +removing their prey drop half of it upon my clothes,--I look +up, and recognize a person to whom I was introduced by +mistake last night at the opera. I would be glad to have less +fellowship with such _fellows._ In former times great +philosophers were said to have demons for familiars,--thereby +indicating that a familiar man is the very devil. + +Remember, that all deviations from prescribed forms, on +common occasions, are vulgar; such as sending invitations, or +replies, couched in some unusual forms of speech. Always +adhere to the immemorial phrase,--"Mrs. X. requests the +honour of Mr, Y.'s company," and "Mr. Y. has the honour of +accepting Mrs. X.'s polite invitation." Never introduce +persons with any outlandish or new-coined expressions; but +perform the operation with mathematical precision--"Mr. A., +Mr. A'; Mr. A', Mr. A." + +When two gentlemen are walking with a lady in the street, +they should not be both upon the same side of her, but one of +them should walk upon the outside and the other upon the +inside. + +When you walk with a lady, even if the lady be young and +unmarried, offer your arm to her. This is always done in +France, and is practised in this country by the best bred +persons. To be sure, this is done only to married women in +France, because unmarried women never walk alone with +gentlemen, but as in America the latter have the same freedom +as the former, this custom should here be extended to them. + +If you are walking with a woman who has your arm, and you +cross the street, it is better not to disengage your arm, and +go round upon the outside. Such effort evinces a palpable +attention to form, and _that_ is always to be avoided. + +A woman should never take the arms of two men, one being upon +either side; nor should a man carry a woman upon each arm. +The latter of these iniquities is practised only in Ireland; +the former perhaps in Kamskatcha. There are, to be sure, some +cases in which it is necessary for the protection of the +women, that they should both take his arm, as in coming home +from a concert, or in passing, on any occasion, through a +crowd. + +When you receive company in your own house, you should never +be much dressed. This is a circumstance of the first +importance in good breeding. + +A gentleman should never use perfumes; they are agreeable, +however, upon ladies. + +Avoid the use of proverbs in conversation, and all sorts of +cant phrases. This error is, I believe, censured by Lord +Chesterfield, and is one of the most offensively vulgar +things which a person can commit. We have frequently been +astonished to hear such a slang phrase as "the whole hog" +used by persons who had pretensions to very superior +standing. We would be disposed to apply to such an expression +a criticism of Dr. Johnson's, which rivals it in Coarseness: +"It has not enough salt to keep it from stinking, enough wit +to prevent its being offensive." We do not wish to advocate +any false refinement, or to encourage any cockney delicacy: +but we may be decent without being affected. The stable +language and raft humour of Crockett and Downing may do very +well to amuse one in a morning paper, but it exhibits little +wit and less good sense to adopt them in the drawing-room. +This matter should be "reformed altogether." + +If a plate be sent to you, at dinner, by the master or +mistress of the house, you should always take it, without +offering it to all your neighbours as was in older times +considered necessary. The spirit of antique manners consisted +in exhibiting an attention to ceremony; the spirit of modern +manners consists in avoiding all possible appearance of form. +The old custom of deferring punctiliously to others was +awkward and inconvenient. For, the person, in favor of whom +the courtesy was shown, shocked at the idea of being exceeded +in politeness, of course declined it, and a plate was thus +often kept vibrating between two bowing mandarins, till its +contents were cold, and the victims of ceremony were deprived +of their dinner. In a case like this, to reverse the decision +which the host has made as to the relative standing of his +guests, is but a poor compliment to him, as it seems to +reprove his choice, and may, besides, materially interfere +with his arrangements by rendering _unhelped_ a person whom +he supposes attended to. + +The same avoidance of too much attention to yielding place is +proper in most other cases. Shenstone, in some clever verses, +has ridiculed the folly; and Goldsmith, in his "Vicar," has +censured the inconvenience, of such outrageous formality. +These things are now managed better. One person yields and +another accepts without any controversy. + +When you are helped to anything at a dinner table, do not +wait, with your plate untouched, until others have begun to +eat. This stiff-piece of mannerism is often occurring in the +country, and indeed among all persons who are not thoroughly +bred. As soon as your plate is placed before you, you should +take up your knife and arrange the table furniture around +you, if you do not actually eat. + +As to the instruments by which the operation of dining is +conducted, it is a matter of much consequence that entire +propriety should be observed as to their use. We have said +nothing about the use of silver forks, because we do not +write for savages; and where, excepting among savages, shall +we find any who at present eat with other than a French +fork?. There are occasionally to be found some ancients, +gentlemen of the old school, as it is termed, who persist in +preferring steel, and who will insist on calling for a steel +fork if there is none on the table. They consider the modem +custom an affectation, and deem that all affectation should +be avoided. They tread upon the pride of Plato, with more +pride. There is often affectation in shunning affectation. It +is better in things not material to submit to the established +habits, especially when, as in the present case, the balance +of convenience is decidedly on the part of fashion. The +ordinary custom among well bred persons, is as follows:--soup +is taken with a spoon. Some foolish _fashionables_ employ a +fork! They might as well make use of a broomstick. The fish +which follows is eaten with a fork, a knife not being used at +all. The fork is held in the right hand, and a piece of bread +in the left. For any dish in which cutting is not +indispensable, the same arrangement is correct. When you have +upon your plate, before the dessert, anything partially +liquid, or any sauces, you must not take them up with a +knife, but with a piece of bread, which is to be saturated +with the juices, and then lifted to the mouth. If such an +article forms part of the dessert, you should eat it with a +spoon. In carving, steel instruments alone are employed. For +fowls a peculiar knife is used, having the blade short and +the handle very long. For fish a broad and pierced silver +blade is used. + +A dinner--we allude to _dinner-parties_--in this country, is +generally despatched with too much hurry. We do not mean, +that persons commonly eat too fast, but that the courses +succeed one another too precipitately. Dinner is the last +operation of the day, and there is no subsequent business +which demands haste. It is usually intended, especially when +there are no ladies, to sit at the table till nine, ten, or +eleven o'clock, and it is more agreeable that the _eating_ +should be prolonged through a considerable portion of the +entire time. The conveniences of digestion also require more +deliberation, and it would therefore not be unpleasant if an +interval of a quarter of an hour or half an hour were allowed +to intervene between the meats and the dessert. + +At dinner, avoid taking upon your plate too many things at +once. One variety of meat and one kind of vegetable is the +_maximum._ When you take another sort of meat, or any dish +not properly a vegetable, you always change your plate. + +The fashion of dining inordinately late in this country is +foolish. It is borrowed from England without any regard to +the difference in circumstances between the two nations. In +London, the whole system of daily duties is much later. The +fact of parliament's sitting during the evening and not in +the morning, tends to remove the active part of the day to a +much more advanced hour. When persons rise at ten or two +o'clock, it is not to be expected that they should dine till +eight or twelve in the evening. There is nothing of this sort +in France. There they dine at three, or earlier. We have +known some fashionable dinners in different cities in this +country at so late an hour as eight or nine o'clock. This is +absurd, where the persons have all breakfasted at eight in +the morning. From four o'clock till five varies the proper +hour for a dinner party here. + +Never talk about politics at a dinner table or in a drawing +room. + +When you are going into a company it is of advantage to run +over in your mind, beforehand, the topics of conversation +which you intend to bring up, and to arrange the manner in +which you will introduce them. You may also refresh your +general ideas upon the subjects, and run through the details +of the few very brief and sprightly anecdotes which you are +going to repeat; and also have in readiness one or two +brilliant phrases or striking words which you will use upon +occasion. Further than this it is dangerous to make much +preparation. If you commit to memory long speeches with the +design of delivering them, your conversation will become +formal, and you will be negligent of the observations of your +company. It will tend also to impair that habit of readiness +and quickness which it is necessary to cultivate in order to +be agreeable. + +You must be very careful that you do not repeat the same +anecdotes or let off the same good things twice to the same +person. Richard Sharpe, the "conversationist" as he was +called in London, kept a regular book of entry, in which he +recorded where and before whom he had uttered severally his +choice sayings. The celebrated Bubb Doddington prepared a +manuscript book of original _faceti',_ which he was +accustomed to read over when he expected any distinguished +company, trusting to an excellent memory to preserve him from +iteration. + +If you accompany your wife to a ball, be very careful not to +dance with her. + +The lady who gives a ball dances but little, and always +selects her partners. + +If you are visited by any company whom you wish to drive away +forever, or any friends whom you wish to alienate, entertain +them by reading to them your own productions. + +If you ask a lady to dance, and she is engaged, do not prefer +a request for her hand at the next set after that, because +she may be engaged for that also, and for many more; and you +would have to run through a long list of interrogatories, +which would be absurd and awkward. + +A gentleman must not expect to shine in society, even the +most frivolous, without a considerable stock of knowledge. He +must be acquainted with facts rather than principles. He +needs no very sublime sciences; but a knowledge of biography +and literary history, of the fine arts, as painting, +engraving, music, etc., will be of great service to him. + +Some men are always seen in the streets with an umbrella +under their arm. Such a foible may be permitted to such men +as Mr. Southey and the Duke of Wellington: but in ordinary +men it looks like affectation, and the monotony is +exceedingly _boring_ to the sight. + +To applaud at a play is not _fashionable_; but it is +_respectable_ to evince by a gentle concurrence of one finger +and a hand that you perceive and enjoy a good stroke in an +actor. + +If you are at a concert, or a private musical party, never +beat time with your feet or your cane. Nothing is more +unpleasant. + +Few things are more agreeable or more difficult, than to +relate anecdotes with entire propriety. They should be +introduced gracefully, have fit connexion with the previous +remarks, and be in perfect keeping with the company, the +subject and the tone of the conversation; they should be +short, witty and eloquent, and they should be new but not +far-fetched. + +In rapid and eager discourse, when persons are excited and +impatient, as at a ball or in a promenade, repeat nothing but +the spirit and soul of a story, leaping over the particulars. +There are however many places and occasions in which you may +bring out the details with advantage, precisely, but not +tediously. When you repeat a true story be always extremely +exact. Mem. Not to forget the point of your story, like most +narrators. + +When you are telling a flat anecdote by mistake, laugh +egregiously, that others may do the same: when you repeat a +spirited and striking bon mot, be grave and composed, in +order that others may not be the same. + +For one who has travelled much, to hit the proper medium +between too much reserve and too much intrusion, on the +subject of his adventures, is not easy. Such a person is +expected to give amusement by pleasant histories of his +travels, and it is agreeable that he should do so, yet with +moderation; he should not reply to every remark by a memoir, +commencing, "When I was in Japan." + +Rampant witticisms which require one to laugh, are apt to +grow fatiguing: it is better to have a sprightly and amusing +vein running through your conversation, which, betraying no +effort, allows one to be grave without offence, or to smile +without pain. + +Punning is now decidedly out of date. It is a silly and +displeasing thing, when it becomes a habit. Some one has +called it the wit of fools. It is within the reach of the +most trifling, and is often used by them to puzzle and +degrade the wise. Whatever may be its merits, it is now out +of fashion. + +It is respectable to go to church once on Sunday. When you +are there, behave with decency. You should never walk in +fashionable places on Sunday afternoon. It is notoriously +vulgar. If your health requires you to take the air, you +should seek some retired street. + +In conversation avoid such phrases as "My _dear_ sir or +madam." + +A gentleman is distinguished as much by his composure as by +any other quality. His exertions are always subdued, and his +efforts easy. He is never surprised into an exclamation or +startled by anything. Throughout life he avoids what the +French call _scenes,_ occasions of exhibition, in which the +vulgar delight. He of course has feelings, but he never +exhibits any to the world. He hears of the death of his +pointer or the loss of an estate with entire calmness when +others are present. + +It is very difficult for a literary man to preserve the +perfect manners and exact semblance of a gentleman. He must +be able to throw aside all the qualities which authorship +tends to stamp so deeply upon him, and thoroughly to despise +the cant of the profession. Yet this must be done without any +affectation. Upon the whole, unless he has rare tact, he will +please as much by going into company with all the marks of +his employment upon his manners, than by awkwardly attempting +to throw off his load. One would rather see a man with his +fingers inked, than to see him nervously striving to cover +them with a tattered kid glove. As to literary ladies, they +make up their minds to sacrifice all present and personal +admiration for future and abiding renown. + +It is not considered fashionable to carry a watch. What has a +fashionable man to do with time? Besides he never goes into +those obscure parts of the town where there are no public +clocks, and his servant will tell him when it is time to +dress for dinner. A gentleman carries his watch in his +pantaloons with a plain black ribbon attached. It is only +worthy of a shop-boy to put it in his waistcoat pocket. + +Custom allows to men the privilege of taking snuff, however +unneat this habit may appear. If you affect the "tangible +smell," always take it from a box, and not from your +waistcoat pocket or a paper. The common opinion, that +Napoleon took snuff from his pocket, (which fact, by the way, +is denied by Bourrienne,) has for ever driven this convenient +custom from the practice of gentlemen, for the same reason +that Lord Byron's anti-neckcloth fashion has compelled every +man of sense to bind a cravat religiously about his throat. +As to taking snuff from a paper, it is vile. + +Women should abstain most scrupulously from tobacco, for +nothing can be more fatal to their divinity: they should at +least avoid it until past fifty;--that is to say, if a woman +past fifty can anywhere be found. Chewing is permitted only +to galley-slaves and metaphysicians. + +It was a favourite maxim of Rivarol, "Do you wish to succeed? +Cite proper names." Rivarol is dead in exile, having left +behind him little property and less reputation. Judging from +all experience, if we were to frame an extreme maxim, it +should be, "If you wish to succeed never cite a proper name." +It will make you agreeable and hated. Your conversation will +be listened to with interest, and your company shunned with +horror. You will obtain the reputation of a gossip and a +scandal-bearer, and you will soon be obliged either to +purchase a razor or apply for a passport. If you are holding +a tete-a-tete with a notorious Mrs. Candour, then, indeed, +your tongue should be as sharp and nimble as the forked +lightning. You must beat her at her own weapons, and convince +her that it would be dangerous to traduce your character to +others. + +A bachelor is a person who enjoys everything and pays for +nothing; a married man is one that pays for everything and +enjoys nothing. The one drives a sulky through life, and is +not expected to take care of any one but himself: the other +keeps a carriage, which is always too full to afford him a +comfortable seat. Be cautious then how you exchange your +sulky for a carriage. + +In ordinary conversation about persons employ the expressions +_men_ and _women_; _gentleman_ and _lady_ are _distinctive_ +appellations, and not to be used upon general occasions. + +You should say _forte-piano,_ not _piano-forte_: and the +_street door,_ not the _front door._ + +"A man may have virtue, capacity, and good conduct," says La +Bruy,re, "and yet be insupportable; the air and manner which +we neglect, as little things, are frequently what the world +judges us by, and makes them decide for or against us." + +In your intercourse with the world you must take persons as +they are, and society as you find it. You must never oppose +the one, nor attempt to alter the other. Society is a +harlequin stage, upon which you never appear in your own +dress nor without a mask. Keep your real dispositions for +your fireside, and your real character for your private +friend. In public, never differ from anybody, nor from +anything. The _agreeable_ man is one who _agrees._ + +THE END. + + + + + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK, THE LAWS OF ETIQUETTE *** + +This file should be named 5681.txt or 5681.zip +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks get a new NUMBER, letiq11.txt +VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, letiq10a.txt + +Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +We are now trying to release all our eBooks one year in advance +of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing. +Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections, +even years after the official publication date. + +Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til +midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement. +The official release date of all Project Gutenberg eBooks is at +Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A +preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment +and editing by those who wish to do so. + +Most people start at our Web sites at: +https://gutenberg.org or +http://promo.net/pg + +These Web sites include award-winning information about Project +Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new +eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!). + + +Those of you who want to download any eBook before announcement +can get to them as follows, and just download by date. This is +also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the +indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an +announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter. + +http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext04 or +ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext04 + +Or /etext03, 02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90 + +Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want, +as it appears in our Newsletters. + + +Information about Project Gutenberg (one page) + +We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The +time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours +to get any eBook selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright +searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. Our +projected audience is one hundred million readers. If the value +per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2 +million dollars per hour in 2002 as we release over 100 new text +files per month: 1240 more eBooks in 2001 for a total of 4000+ +We are already on our way to trying for 2000 more eBooks in 2002 +If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total +will reach over half a trillion eBooks given away by year's end. + +The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks! +This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers, +which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users. + +Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated): + +eBooks Year Month + + 1 1971 July + 10 1991 January + 100 1994 January + 1000 1997 August + 1500 1998 October + 2000 1999 December + 2500 2000 December + 3000 2001 November + 4000 2001 October/November + 6000 2002 December* + 9000 2003 November* +10000 2004 January* + + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created +to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +As of February, 2002, contributions are being solicited from people +and organizations in: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, +Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, +Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, +Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New +Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, +Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South +Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West +Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. + +We have filed in all 50 states now, but these are the only ones +that have responded. + +As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list +will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states. +Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state. + +In answer to various questions we have received on this: + +We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally +request donations in all 50 states. If your state is not listed and +you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have, +just ask. + +While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are +not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting +donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to +donate. + +International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about +how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made +deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are +ways. + +Donations by check or money order may be sent to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Ave. +Oxford, MS 38655-4109 + +Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment +method other than by check or money order. + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by +the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN +[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154. Donations are +tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law. As fund-raising +requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be +made and fund-raising will begin in the additional states. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +You can get up to date donation information online at: + +https://www.gutenberg.org/donation.html + + +*** + +If you can't reach Project Gutenberg, +you can always email directly to: + +Michael S. Hart <hart@pobox.com> + +Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message. + +We would prefer to send you information by email. + + +**The Legal Small Print** + + +(Three Pages) + +***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS**START*** +Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers. +They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with +your copy of this eBook, even if you got it for free from +someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our +fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement +disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how +you may distribute copies of this eBook if you want to. + +*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS EBOOK +By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm +eBook, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept +this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive +a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this eBook by +sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person +you got it from. If you received this eBook on a physical +medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request. + +ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM EBOOKS +This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBooks, +is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart +through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project"). +Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright +on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and +distribute it in the United States without permission and +without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth +below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this eBook +under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark. + +Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market +any commercial products without permission. + +To create these eBooks, the Project expends considerable +efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain +works. Despite these efforts, the Project's eBooks and any +medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other +things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged +disk or other eBook medium, a computer virus, or computer +codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. + +LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES +But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below, +[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may +receive this eBook from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook) disclaims +all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including +legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR +UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT, +INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE +OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE +POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. + +If you discover a Defect in this eBook within 90 days of +receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) +you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that +time to the person you received it from. If you received it +on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and +such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement +copy. If you received it electronically, such person may +choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to +receive it electronically. + +THIS EBOOK IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS +TO THE EBOOK OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A +PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or +the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the +above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you +may have other legal rights. + +INDEMNITY +You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation, +and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated +with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm +texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including +legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the +following that you do or cause: [1] distribution of this eBook, +[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the eBook, +or [3] any Defect. + +DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm" +You may distribute copies of this eBook electronically, or by +disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this +"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg, +or: + +[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this + requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the + eBook or this "small print!" statement. You may however, + if you wish, distribute this eBook in machine readable + binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form, + including any form resulting from conversion by word + processing or hypertext software, but only so long as + *EITHER*: + + [*] The eBook, when displayed, is clearly readable, and + does *not* contain characters other than those + intended by the author of the work, although tilde + (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may + be used to convey punctuation intended by the + author, and additional characters may be used to + indicate hypertext links; OR + + [*] The eBook may be readily converted by the reader at + no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent + form by the program that displays the eBook (as is + the case, for instance, with most word processors); + OR + + [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at + no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the + eBook in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC + or other equivalent proprietary form). + +[2] Honor the eBook refund and replacement provisions of this + "Small Print!" statement. + +[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the + gross profits you derive calculated using the method you + already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you + don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are + payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation" + the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were + legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent + periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to + let us know your plans and to work out the details. + +WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO? +Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of +public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed +in machine readable form. + +The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time, +public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses. +Money should be paid to the: +"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or +software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at: +hart@pobox.com + +[Portions of this eBook's header and trailer may be reprinted only +when distributed free of all fees. Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 by +Michael S. Hart. Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be +used in any sales of Project Gutenberg eBooks or other materials be +they hardware or software or any other related product without +express permission.] + +*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS*Ver.02/11/02*END* + diff --git a/old/5681.zip b/old/5681.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1999348 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/5681.zip |
