summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--42865-0.txt (renamed from 42865.txt)539
-rw-r--r--42865-8.txt3737
-rw-r--r--42865-8.zipbin85731 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--42865-h.zipbin171284 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--42865-h/42865-h.htm567
-rw-r--r--42865.zipbin85658 -> 0 bytes
6 files changed, 144 insertions, 4699 deletions
diff --git a/42865.txt b/42865-0.txt
index cb026e6..a99b351 100644
--- a/42865.txt
+++ b/42865-0.txt
@@ -1,39 +1,4 @@
-Project Gutenberg's English Conferences of Ernest Renan, by Ernest Renan
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-
-Title: English Conferences of Ernest Renan
- Rome and Christianity. Marcus Aurelius
-
-Author: Ernest Renan
-
-Translator: Clara Erskine Clement
-
-Release Date: June 3, 2013 [EBook #42865]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: ASCII
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLISH CONFERENCES ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Charlene Taylor, Michael Seow and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 42865 ***
ENGLISH CONFERENCES
OF
@@ -125,8 +90,8 @@ THE SENSE IN WHICH CHRISTIANITY IS A ROMAN WORK.
Ladies and Gentlemen,--I was proud and happy to receive from the
curators of this noble institution an invitation to continue here an
-instruction inaugurated by my illustrious confrere and friend, Max
-Mueller, the usefulness of which will be more and more appreciated. A
+instruction inaugurated by my illustrious confrère and friend, Max
+Müller, the usefulness of which will be more and more appreciated. A
broad and sincere thought always bears fruit. It is thirty years since
the venerable Robert Hibbert made a legacy for the purpose of aiding the
progress of enlightened Christianity, inseparable, according to his
@@ -275,7 +240,7 @@ him.
The consequence of this essentially political character was, that the
Roman religion remained always an aristocratic religion. A man became
-pontiff as he became praetor or consul. When a man desired these
+pontiff as he became prætor or consul. When a man desired these
religious functions, he submitted to no examination; he went into no
retreat in a seminary; he did not ask himself whether he had the
ecclesiastical vocation: he proved that he had served his country well,
@@ -302,7 +267,7 @@ priesthood for a long time forbidden to the plebeians, but they were
also excluded from the public worship. In the great struggle for civil
equality which fills the history of Rome, religion is the great argument
with which the revolutionists are opposed. "How," say they, "could you
-become a praetor or consul? You have not the right to take the omens."
+become a prætor or consul? You have not the right to take the omens."
Above all, the people were very little attached to religion. Each
popular victory was followed, as one may say, by an anti-clerical
re-action: on the contrary, the aristocracy remained always faithful to
@@ -360,10 +325,10 @@ II.
If one studies in fact the progress of the primitive Christian missions,
he remarks that they are all directed towards the West: in other words,
they take the Roman Empire as their theatre and limit. If one excepts
-some small portions of the vassal territory of the Arsacidae, lying
+some small portions of the vassal territory of the Arsacidæ, lying
between the Euphrates and the Tigris, the empire of the Parthians
received no Christian missions during the first century. The Tigris was
-an eastern boundary which Christianity did not pass under the Sassanidae.
+an eastern boundary which Christianity did not pass under the Sassanidæ.
Two great causes--the Mediterranean and the Roman Empire--determined
this capital fact.
@@ -410,7 +375,7 @@ socialism and religion. At the close of the frightful wars which for
some centuries had rent the world, the empire had an era of prosperity
and of welfare such as it had never known: we may even be permitted to
add (without a paradox) liberty. Liberty of thought, at least, increased
-under this new _regime_. This liberty is often more prosperous under a
+under this new _régime_. This liberty is often more prosperous under a
king or a prince than under the jealous and narrow-minded plebeian. The
ancient republics did not have it. The Greeks did great things without
it, thanks to the incomparable power of their genius; but it must not be
@@ -449,7 +414,7 @@ been under the Roman authority, would have stifled it. It was the Roman
magistrates who hindered the Pharisees from killing Christianity. Some
lofty ideas of universal brotherhood--results, in the main, of
stoicism,--a sort of general sentiment of humanity, were the fruit of
-the least narrow _regime_ and of the least exclusive education to which
+the least narrow _régime_ and of the least exclusive education to which
the individual was submitted. The people dreamed of a new era and new
worlds. The public riches were great; and, in spite of the imperfection
of the economical doctrines of the time, there was general comfort.
@@ -463,7 +428,7 @@ which goodness, conjugal fidelity, the domestic virtues, and uprightness
were commonly practised. Does there anywhere exist, in a world of honest
people in small villages, an ideal of family life more charming than
that which Plutarch has left us? What good fellowship! What sweetness of
-manners! What chaste and attractive simplicity! Chaeronea was evidently
+manners! What chaste and attractive simplicity! Chæronea was evidently
not the only place where life was so pure and so innocent.
The customs, even outside of Rome, were still somewhat cruel, either
@@ -484,7 +449,7 @@ that he is capable of virtue, of fidelity, of devotion, and he gives
proofs of it. The prejudices concerning noble birth grow less. Some very
humane and just laws are made, even under the worst emperors. Tiberius
was a skilful financier: he founded upon an excellent basis an
-establishment of _credit foncier_. Nero inaugurated in the system of
+establishment of _crédit foncier_. Nero inaugurated in the system of
taxation, until then unjust and barbarous, some improvements which shame
even our own time. Legislation was considerably advanced, while the
punishment of death was stupidly prodigal. Love of the poor, sympathy
@@ -518,14 +483,14 @@ the legends, the customs, the misfortunes, the hopes, the common
sorrows: the body is the soil, the race, the language, the mountains,
the rivers, the characteristic productions. Now, was a people ever more
wanting in all this than the first Christians? They did not cling to
-Judaea; after a few years they had forgotten Galilee; the glory of Greece
+Judæa; after a few years they had forgotten Galilee; the glory of Greece
and Rome was indifferent to them. The countries in which Christianity
was first established--Syria, Cyprus, and Asia Minor--no longer
remembered the time when they were free. Greece and Rome, it is true,
still had a grand national sentiment. At Rome, patriotism survived in a
few families; in Greece, Christianity flourished only at Corinth,--a
city which, since its destruction by Mummius, and its reconstruction by
-Caesar, was the resort of men of all races. The true Greek countries,
+Cæsar, was the resort of men of all races. The true Greek countries,
then, as to-day, very jealous, very much absorbed in the memories of
their past, gave little countenance to the new doctrines: they were
always lukewarm Christians. On the contrary, those gay, indolent,
@@ -552,7 +517,7 @@ expelled as a mortal poison to the State.
And here was one of the causes of the grandeur of the new religion.
Humanity is a multiform, changeable thing, tormented by conflicting
-desires. _La patrie_ is grand, and the heroes of Marathon and Thermopylae
+desires. _La patrie_ is grand, and the heroes of Marathon and Thermopylæ
are saints. But one's country is not all here below: one is a man and a
son of God, before he is a Frenchman, or a German. The kingdom of God,
an eternal dream which is never destroyed in the heart of man, is a
@@ -665,7 +630,7 @@ been found in him.
We shall see, however, in our next conference, that the religious reign
of the future belonged neither to Serapis, nor to Mithra. The
-predestined religion grew imperceptibly in Judaea. This would have
+predestined religion grew imperceptibly in Judæa. This would have
greatly astonished the most sagacious Romans, if it had been announced
to them. It would have been shocking to them in the highest degree. But
so often in history have improbable predictions become true, so often
@@ -754,7 +719,7 @@ I.
The establishment of the Jews at Rome dated nearly sixty years before
Jesus Christ. They multiplied rapidly. Cicero represented it as an act
-of courage to dare to oppose them. Caesar favored them, and found them
+of courage to dare to oppose them. Cæsar favored them, and found them
faithful. The people detested them, thought them malevolent, accused
them of forming a secret society whose members were advanced at any
price, to the detriment of others. But all did not approve these
@@ -894,7 +859,7 @@ pronounced on the quay of Rome the name of Jesus.
A capital trait, which it is important to note in any case, is, that the
Church of Rome was not, like the churches of Asia Minor, Macedonia, and
Greece, a foundation of the school of Paul. It was fundamentally
-Judaean-Christian, re-attaching itself directly to the Church of
+Judæan-Christian, re-attaching itself directly to the Church of
Jerusalem. Paul here will never be on his own ground: he will find in
this great church many weaknesses which he will treat with indulgence,
but which will wound his exalted idealism. Attached to circumcision and
@@ -945,7 +910,7 @@ contrary, thought that to maintain the ancient law was an injury to
Jesus, since thus it might be supposed, that, outside the merits of
Jesus, such or such a work could serve for the justification of the
faithful. However strange it may appear, it is certain that the
-Judaean-Christians of Jerusalem, with James at their head, organized some
+Judæan-Christians of Jerusalem, with James at their head, organized some
active contra-missions in order to combat the effect of the missions of
Paul, and that the emissaries of these ardent conservatives followed in
some sort the lead of the apostle of the Gentiles. Peter belonged to the
@@ -1078,7 +1043,7 @@ It originated in that portion of the great Circus near to the Palatine
and C[oe]lian Hills. In this quarter there were many little shops,
filled with inflammable matter, in which the flames spread with
prodigious rapidity. Thence it made the turn of the Palatine, ravaged
-the Velabra, the Forum, the Carinae, ascended the hills, greatly injured
+the Velabra, the Forum, the Carinæ, ascended the hills, greatly injured
the Palatine, descended again to the valleys, devouring compact
quarters, and piercing tortuous streets, continuing six days and seven
nights. An enormous pile of houses which were torn down near the foot of
@@ -1106,7 +1071,7 @@ when it seemed about to die out.
These suspicions were confirmed by the fact, that, after the fire, Nero,
under pretext of removing the ruins at his own cost, in order to leave
-the place free to the proprietors, undertook to clear away the _debris_;
+the place free to the proprietors, undertook to clear away the _débris_;
and the people were not allowed to approach. This seemed worse when it
was seen that he drew from the ruins what belonged to the country, when
the new palace, that "golden house" which had been the plaything of his
@@ -1176,7 +1141,7 @@ had never been seen. Almost all those arrested were of the _humiliores_
(the poorest classes). The sentence of these unfortunates, when it
concerned high treason or sacrilege, was to be thrown to the beasts, or
to be burned alive in the amphitheatre. One of the most hideous traits
-of Roman manners was that of making a _fete_, a public amusement, of
+of Roman manners was that of making a _fête_, a public amusement, of
these tortures. The amphitheatres had become places of execution: the
tribunals furnished the victims. The condemned of the entire world were
forwarded to Rome for the provisionment of the circus and the amusement
@@ -1187,7 +1152,7 @@ consecrated to the combats of animals, presented an appearance hitherto
unknown. The condemned, covered with the tawny skins of beasts, were
hurried into the arena, where they were torn by dogs. Some were
crucified: others, reclothed with tunics steeped in oil, wax, or resin,
-were bound to posts, and reserved to light up the evening _fetes_. When
+were bound to posts, and reserved to light up the evening _fêtes_. When
the day lowered, these living torches were ignited. For this spectacle,
Nero offered his magnificent gardens beyond the Tiber, which occupied
the site of the present Borgo, the Square, and the Church of St. Peter.
@@ -1205,7 +1170,7 @@ hideous torches, Nero, who had established the custom of evening
entertainments, showed himself in the arena, sometimes mingling with the
people in the dress of a charioteer, sometimes conducting his chariot
and seeking applause. Women and young girls were involved in these
-horrible games: a _fete_ was made of the nameless indignities which they
+horrible games: a _fête_ was made of the nameless indignities which they
suffered. Under Nero, the custom was established of compelling the
condemned to play in the amphitheatre some mythological part entailing
the death of the actor. These hideous operas, where mechanical science
@@ -1214,28 +1179,28 @@ was introduced into the arena, richly costumed as god or hero devoted to
death. He then represented by his suffering some tragic scene of the
fables consecrated by sculptors and poets. Sometimes it was the furious
Hercules burned on Mount [OE]ta, tearing the waxed tunic from his skin;
-sometimes Orpheus torn in pieces by a bear; Daedalus thrown from heaven,
-and devoured by beasts; Pasiphae struggling in the embraces of the bull;
+sometimes Orpheus torn in pieces by a bear; Dædalus thrown from heaven,
+and devoured by beasts; Pasiphæ struggling in the embraces of the bull;
Attys murdered. Sometimes there were horrible masquerades, in which the
men were dressed like priests of Saturn with a red cloak, the women as
priestesses of Ceres with fillets on the brow; finally, at other times,
some dramatic work of the time, in which the hero was really condemned
to death as Laureolus; or the representations were those of such tragic
-acts as that of Mucius Scaevola. At the end of these hideous spectacles,
+acts as that of Mucius Scævola. At the end of these hideous spectacles,
Mercury, with a red-hot iron wand, touched each corpse to see if it
moved. Some masked valets, dressed like Pluto or Orcus, dragged away the
dead by the feet, killing with hammers all who still breathed. The
Christian ladies of the highest respectability even suffered these
-monstrosities. Some played the _role_ of the Danaides, others that of
+monstrosities. Some played the _rôle_ of the Danaïdes, others that of
Dirce. It is difficult to say what fable furnishes a more bloody picture
-than that of the Danaides. The suffering which all mythological
+than that of the Danaïdes. The suffering which all mythological
tradition attributes to these guilty women was not cruel enough to
-suffice for the pleasure of Nero and the _habitues_ of his amphitheatre.
+suffice for the pleasure of Nero and the _habitués_ of his amphitheatre.
Sometimes they were led out bearing urns, and received the fatal blow
from an actor figuring as Lynceus. Sometimes these unhappy beings went
through the series of the sufferings of Tartarus before the spectators,
and only died after hours of torments. The representations of Hell were
-quite _a la mode_. Some years previous (the year 41), some Egyptians and
+quite _à la mode_. Some years previous (the year 41), some Egyptians and
Nubians came to Rome, and made a great success in giving evening
performances, in which they displayed in order the horrors of the
subterranean world, conforming to the paintings of the burial-places of
@@ -1245,7 +1210,7 @@ As for the sufferings of the Dirces, there was no doubt about them.
People know the colossal group now in the Museum of Naples, called the
_Toro Farnese_,--Amphion and Zethus attaching Dirce to the horns of an
unmanageable bull, which is to drag her over the rocks and briers of
-Cithaeron. This mediocre Rhodian marble, brought to Rome in the time of
+Cithæron. This mediocre Rhodian marble, brought to Rome in the time of
Augustus, was the object of universal admiration. How could there be a
finer subject for the hideous art which the cruelty of the time had made
in vogue, and which consisted in reproducing the celebrated statues in
@@ -1257,7 +1222,7 @@ people. Some of the Christians immolated in this way were feeble in
body: their courage was superhuman. But the infamous crowd had eyes
alone for their torn bowels and lacerated bosoms.
-After the day when Jesus expired in Golgotha, the _fete_ day in the
+After the day when Jesus expired in Golgotha, the _fête_ day in the
Gardens of Nero (it may be fixed about the first of August, 64) was the
most solemn in the history of Christianity. The solidity of any
construction is in proportion to the sum of virtue, of sacrifices, and
@@ -1265,7 +1230,7 @@ of devotion which has been laid down at its base. Only fanatics lay
foundations. Judaism endures still on account of the intense frenzy of
its zealots; Christianity, on account of its first witnesses. The orgy
of Nero was the grand baptism of blood which set Rome apart as the city
-of martyrs in order to play a distinct _role_ in the history of
+of martyrs in order to play a distinct _rôle_ in the history of
Christianity and to be the second Holy City. It was the taking
possession of the Vatican Hill by conquerors hitherto unknown there. The
odious, hair-brained man who governed the world did not perceive that he
@@ -1298,7 +1263,7 @@ shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not"--includes
some allusion to a peculiarity in the suffering of Peter. Paul, in his
quality of _honestior_, had his head cut off. It is also probable that
he was judged regularly, and that he was not included in the summary
-condemnations of the victims in the _fete_ of Nero. All that, I repeat,
+condemnations of the victims in the _fête_ of Nero. All that, I repeat,
is doubtful, and of little importance. True or not, the legend is
believed. At the commencement of the third century, near Rome, there
were already seen two monuments bearing the names of Peter and Paul. One
@@ -1326,16 +1291,16 @@ the less for our remembrance one of the spots most truly hallowed by
Christianity. The place which the seventeenth century surrounded with a
theatrical colonnade was a second Calvary; and, even supposing that
Peter was not crucified there, at least we cannot doubt the sufferings
-of the Danaides and the Dirces.
+of the Danaïdes and the Dirces.
* * * * *
We shall show in our next assembly how tradition disposes of all these
doubts, and how the Church consummates reconciliation between Peter and
Paul, which death perhaps began. This was the price of success. The
-Judaean-Christianity of Peter and the Hellenism of Paul, apparently
+Judæan-Christianity of Peter and the Hellenism of Paul, apparently
irreconcilable, were equally necessary to the success of the future
-work. The Judaean-Christianity represented the conservative spirit
+work. The Judæan-Christianity represented the conservative spirit
without which nothing is solid; Hellenism, advance and progress, without
which nothing truly exists. Life is the result of a conflict between two
contrary forces. The absence of all revolutionary spirit is as fatal as
@@ -1363,7 +1328,7 @@ ROME THE CENTRE OF THE FORMATION OF ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY.
I.
Almost always the nations created to play a part in universal
-civilization, like Judaea, Greece, and the Italy of the renaissance,
+civilization, like Judæa, Greece, and the Italy of the renaissance,
exercise their full action upon the world, only after becoming victims
to their own grandeur. They must first die; then the world lives on
them, assimilates to itself that which they have created at the price of
@@ -1374,8 +1339,8 @@ humanity. The nation which works out social and religious problems in
its own bosom is almost always weak politically. Every country which
dreams of a kingdom of God, which lives for general ideas, which pursues
a work of universal interest, sacrifices through the same its individual
-destiny, enfeebles and destroys its _role_ as a terrestrial country.
-One can never set himself on fire with impunity. Since Judaea made the
+destiny, enfeebles and destroys its _rôle_ as a terrestrial country.
+One can never set himself on fire with impunity. Since Judæa made the
religious conquest of the world, it was necessary that she should
disappear as a nation. A revolution of extreme violence broke out in
this country in the year 66. During four years, this strange race, which
@@ -1405,7 +1370,7 @@ feudality, tolerant towards all provincial differences, almost analogous
to the Califat of Bagdad and to the Ottoman Empire, was the rule under
which the Jews found themselves most at ease. The Ptolemaic rule in the
third century before Jesus Christ seemed equally sympathetic to them:
-there were even no Seleucidae. Antioch had become an active centre of
+there were even no Seleucidæ. Antioch had become an active centre of
Hellenic propagandism. Antiochus Epiphanus felt it necessary to set up
everywhere the image of Jupiter Olympus as the sign of his power. Then
broke out the first great Jewish revolt against profane civilization.
@@ -1413,7 +1378,7 @@ Israel had patiently supported the disappearance of its political
existence since Nebuchadnezzar. It retained no measure in which it saw a
danger to its religious institutions. A race, in general not military,
was seized with an access of heroism; without a regular army, without
-generals, without tactics, it conquered the Seleucidae, maintained its
+generals, without tactics, it conquered the Seleucidæ, maintained its
revealed rights, and created a second period of autonomy. The Asmonean
royalty, nevertheless, was always distracted by profound interior vices.
It endured but one century. The destiny of the Jewish people was not to
@@ -1430,7 +1395,7 @@ rightly so, if we mean by it that the profound idea of the Semitic
religions, and of the empires which came out from them, is the kingdom
of God considered as the master of the world, and universal suzerain.
But theocracy with these nations was not synonymous with the domination
-of priests. The priest, properly speaking, plays an unimportant _role_
+of priests. The priest, properly speaking, plays an unimportant _rôle_
in the history of Judaism and Islamism. The power belongs to the
representative of God,--to him whom God inspires, to the prophet, to the
holy man, to him who has received his mission from Heaven, and who
@@ -1449,7 +1414,7 @@ _animus_ has been to form communities with their own laws and their own
magistrates in the midst of other states, until modern liberalism
introduced the principle of the equality of all before the law.
-The Roman rule, established in Judaea sixty-three years before Christ by
+The Roman rule, established in Judæa sixty-three years before Christ by
the armies of Pompey, seemed at first to realize some of the conditions
of Jewish life. Rome at this epoch did not pursue the policy of
assimilating the countries which she annexed to her vast empire. She
@@ -1591,7 +1556,7 @@ hate and exclusion once destroyed, the reconciliation of the opposing
parties in the Church of Jesus will become easy. Peter and Paul will be
brought into accord, and the terrible duality of the new-born
Christianity will cease to be a mortal sore. Lost in the depth of the
-interior of the Batanaea and the Hauran, the little group which attached
+interior of the Batanæa and the Hauran, the little group which attached
itself to James and Clopas becomes the Ebionite sect, and slowly dies.
These relatives of Jesus were pious, tranquil, mild, modest,
@@ -1823,7 +1788,7 @@ right of the other to be called Christian. James, the partisan of
absolute Judaism, was sacrificed, although he had been the true chief of
the circumcision. Peter, who was much less objectionable to the
disciples of Paul, was preferred before him. James retained no devoted
-partisans outside of the Judaean-Christians.
+partisans outside of the Judæan-Christians.
It is difficult to say who gained the most in this reconciliation. The
concessions came principally from the side of Paul: all Paul's disciples
@@ -1832,7 +1797,7 @@ the followers of Paul. But concessions usually come from the strong. In
truth, each day confirmed Paul's victory.
Each Gentile convert weighted the balance on his side. Outside of Syria,
-the Judaean-Christians were swallowed up by the wave of new converts. The
+the Judæan-Christians were swallowed up by the wave of new converts. The
churches of Paul prospered: they had good judgment, solidity of mind,
and some pecuniary resources which the others had not. The Ebionite
churches, on the contrary, grew poorer each day. The money of the
@@ -1863,14 +1828,14 @@ parties, and gave an opportunity for the most diverse combinations. The
tissue of tradition grew in this respect, by an instinctive travail,
almost as imperious as that which had presided at the construction of
the legend of Jesus. The end of the life of Peter and of Paul was
-commanded _a priori_. It was maintained that Christ had predicted the
+commanded _à priori_. It was maintained that Christ had predicted the
martyrdom of Peter, as he had announced the death of the sons of
Zebedee. The need was felt of associating in death the two persons who
had been reconciled by force. It was hoped, and perhaps this was not far
from right, that they died together, or at least as the consequence of
the same event. The places which were believed to have been sanctified
by this bloody drama were early fixed upon, and consecrated by
-_memoriae_. In each case, whatever the people desired came in the end to
+_memoriæ_. In each case, whatever the people desired came in the end to
be true. Tradition makes history, retrospectively, as it ought to have
been, and as it never is. Not long ago the portraits of Victor Emmanuel
and Pius IX. hung side by side in every frequented place in Italy; and
@@ -1986,7 +1951,7 @@ I.
From the year 120 to 130 the Episcopate was elaborated in the Christian
Church, and the creation of the Episcopate was eminently a Roman work.
-All _ecclesiae_ imply a little hierarchy,--a bureau as it is called
+All _ecclesiæ_ imply a little hierarchy,--a bureau as it is called
to-day,--a president, some assessors, and a small staff of men in its
service. Democratic associations are careful that these functions shall
be limited as far as possible as to power and duration; but from this
@@ -2183,7 +2148,7 @@ those of our own day, are nearly the same thing.
Thus the grand organisms which have become so essential a part of the
moral and political life of European nations were all created by those
-_naive_ and sincere Christians, whose faith has become inseparable from
+_naïve_ and sincere Christians, whose faith has become inseparable from
the moral culture of humanity. The Episcopate under Marcus Aurelius was
fully ripe: the Papacy existed in germ. [OE]cumenical councils were
impossible. The Christian Empire alone could authorize great assemblies;
@@ -2217,7 +2182,7 @@ second century by certain clear indications. The writing made at Rome
about 180, of which the Roman fragment known as the "_Canon de
Muratori_" makes a part, shows us Rome already regulating the canon of
the churches, making the passion of Peter the basis of Catholicity, and
-repulsing equally Montanism and Gnosticism. Irenaeus refutes all
+repulsing equally Montanism and Gnosticism. Irenæus refutes all
heresies by the faith of this church, "the grandest, the most ancient,
the most illustrious, which possesses by continuous succession the true
tradition of the apostles Peter and Paul; to which, on account of its
@@ -2230,7 +2195,7 @@ other churches. The heretics condemned to the mines received a subsidy
from it: the common treasury was in a certain sense at Rome. The Sunday
collection, practised continually in the Roman Church, was probably
already established. A marvellous spirit of tradition animated this
-little community, in which Judaea, Greece, and Latium seemed to have
+little community, in which Judæa, Greece, and Latium seemed to have
confounded their very different gifts, in view of a prodigious future.
While the Jewish Monotheism furnished the immovable base of the new
formation, while Greece continued through Gnosticism its work of free
@@ -2308,7 +2273,7 @@ Universal Church, the most illustrious province, because it had not bent
its traditions before the Roman discipline. He published a decree by
virtue of which Asia was placed under the ban of the Christian
community. But the other bishops opposed this violent measure, and
-recalled Victor to charity. St. Irenaeus, in particular, who, through the
+recalled Victor to charity. St. Irenæus, in particular, who, through the
necessity of the country in which he lived, had accepted for himself and
his churches in Gaul the Occidental custom, could not support the
thought that the mother-churches of Asia, to which he felt himself bound
@@ -2317,7 +2282,7 @@ Universal Church. He energetically persuaded Victor from the
excommunication of the churches which held to the traditions of their
fathers, and recalled to him the examples of his more tolerant
predecessors. This act of rare good sense prevented the schism of the
-Orient and the Occident from occurring in the second century. Irenaeus
+Orient and the Occident from occurring in the second century. Irenæus
wrote to the bishops on all sides, and the question remained open to the
churches of Asia.
@@ -2378,7 +2343,7 @@ identified with Babylon. Such were the authors of apocalypses and
sibylline writings. But the faithful of the great churches were of quite
a different way of thinking. In 70, the Church of Jerusalem, with a
sentiment more Christian than patriotic, left the revolutionary city,
-and sought peace beyond the Jordan. In the revolt of Barkokebas, the
+and sought peace beyond the Jordan. In the revolt of Barkokébas, the
division was still more pronounced. Not a single Christian was willing
to take part in this attempt of blind despair. St. Justin in his
Apologies never combats the principle of empire. He desired that the
@@ -2422,7 +2387,7 @@ where it hopes for favors is already very transparent. It is shown,
contrary to all truth, that Hadrian and Antonine sought to repair the
evil done by Nero and Domitian. Tertullian and his generation say the
same thing of Marcus Aurelius. Tertullian doubted, it is true, whether
-one could be at the same time a Caesar and a Christian; but this
+one could be at the same time a Cæsar and a Christian; but this
incompatibility a century later struck no one, and Constantine proved
that Meliton of Sardis was a very sagacious man when he discerned so
well--a century and a half in advance, seeing through the proconsular
@@ -2481,7 +2446,7 @@ of realization. This is seen most plainly under those Syrian emperors
whom their quality of foreigners and base origin placed beyond
prejudices, and who, in spite of their vices, inaugurated a largeness of
ideas and a tolerance hitherto unknown. Those Syrian women of
-Emesa,--Julia Domna, Julia Maesa, Julia Mammaea, Julia Soemia,--beautiful,
+Emesa,--Julia Domna, Julia Mæsa, Julia Mammæa, Julia Soemia,--beautiful,
intelligent, perfectly fearless, and held by no tradition or social law,
hesitated at nothing. They did what Roman women would never have dared.
They entered the Senate, deliberated there, and governed the empire
@@ -2511,7 +2476,7 @@ humbled. Constantine saw the interior strength of the Church. The
population of Asia Minor, Syria, Thrace, and Macedonia, in a word the
eastern part of the empire, was already more than half Christian. His
mother, who had been a servant in an inn at Nicomedia, dazzled his eyes
-with the picture of an Eastern empire having its centre near Nicaea or
+with the picture of an Eastern empire having its centre near Nicæa or
Nicomedia, whose nerves should be the bishops and those multitudes of
poor matriculates of the Church who controlled opinion in large cities.
Constantine made the empire Christian. From the Occidental point of
@@ -2652,7 +2617,7 @@ duped. No: liberty is the great dissolvent of all fanaticisms. In giving
back liberty to my enemy, who would suppress me if he had the power, I
shall really make him the worst gift. I oblige him to drink a strong
beverage which shall turn his head, while I shall keep my own. Science
-supports the strange _regime_ of liberty: fanaticism and superstition do
+supports the strange _régime_ of liberty: fanaticism and superstition do
not support it. We do more harm to dogmatism by treating it with an
implacable sweetness than by persecuting it. By this sweetness we even
inculcate the principle which destroys all dogmatism at its root, by
@@ -2709,7 +2674,7 @@ discourse to you, not one of those subtleties which divide, but one of
those themes, dear to the soul, which bring nearer, and reconcile. I
shall speak to you of that book resplendent with the divine spirit, that
manual of submissive life which the most godly of men has left us,--the
-Caesar, Marcus Aurelius Antonine. It is the glory of sovereigns that the
+Cæsar, Marcus Aurelius Antonine. It is the glory of sovereigns that the
most irreproachable model of virtue may be found in their ranks, and
that the most beautiful lessons of patience and of self-control may come
from a condition which one naturally believes to be subject to all the
@@ -2720,7 +2685,7 @@ I.
The inheritance of wisdom with a throne is always rare: I find in
history but two striking examples of it,--in India, the succession of
-the three Mongol emperors, Baber, Hoomayoon, and Akbar; at Rome, at the
+the three Mongol emperors, Bâber, Hoomâyoon, and Akbar; at Rome, at the
head of the greatest empire that ever existed, the two admirable reigns
of Antonine the Pious and Marcus Aurelius. Of the last two, I consider
Antonine the greatest. His goodness did not lead him into faults: he was
@@ -2748,7 +2713,7 @@ endured it without submission were honored as heroes. The accession of
the Antonines was only the coming to power of the society of sages, of
whose just anger Tacitus has informed us,--a society of wise men formed
by the league of all those who had revolted against the despotism of the
-first Caesars.
+first Cæsars.
The salutary principle of adoption made the imperial court of the second
century a true cradle of virtue. The noble and learned Nerva, in
@@ -2767,12 +2732,12 @@ hastening the hour. Marcus Aurelius was made emperor so young, that the
idea of ruling had scarcely occurred to him, and had not for a moment
exercised its charm upon his mind.
-At eight years, when he was already _praesul_ of the Salian priests,
+At eight years, when he was already _præsul_ of the Salian priests,
Hadrian remarked this sad child, and loved him for his good-nature, his
docility, and his incapability of falsehood. At eighteen years the
empire was assured to him. He awaited it patiently for twenty-two years.
The evening when Antonine, feeling himself about to die, after having
-given to the tribune the watchword, _AEquanimitas_, commanded the golden
+given to the tribune the watchword, _Æquanimitas_, commanded the golden
statue of Fortune, which was always in the apartment of the emperor, to
be borne into that of his adopted son, he experienced neither surprise
nor joy.
@@ -2862,7 +2827,7 @@ military chieftain: it was a sort of grand civil magistracy, without
resembling a court in any way, or depriving the emperor of his private
character. Marcus Aurelius, in particular, was neither much nor little a
king in the true sense of the word. His fortune was immense, but all
-employed for good: his aversion for "the Caesars," whom he considered as
+employed for good: his aversion for "the Cæsars," whom he considered as
a species of Sardanapali, magnificent, debauched, and cruel, burst out
at each instant. The civility of his manners was extreme. He gave to the
Senate all its ancient importance: when he was at Rome, he never missed
@@ -3061,7 +3026,7 @@ to have remained three or five years? That which is governed by laws is
unjust for no one. What is there, then, so sorrowful in being sent from
the city, not by a tyrant, not by an unjust judge, but by the same
nature which allowed thee to enter there? It is as if a comedian is
-discharged from the theatre by the same praetor who engaged him. But wilt
+discharged from the theatre by the same prætor who engaged him. But wilt
thou say, 'I have not played the five acts; I have played but three?'
Thou sayest well; but in life three acts suffice to complete the entire
piece.... Go, then, content, since he who dismisses thee is content."
@@ -3093,7 +3058,7 @@ contrary to justice and right."
Ah! is it too much resignation, ladies and gentlemen? If it is veritably
thus, we have the right to complain. To say, that, if this world has not
its counterpart, the man who is sacrificed to truth or right ought to
-leave it content, and absolve the gods,--that is too _naive_. No, he has
+leave it content, and absolve the gods,--that is too _naïve_. No, he has
a right to blaspheme them. For, in short, why has his credulity been
thus abused? Why should he have been endowed with deceitful instincts,
of which he has been the honest dupe? Wherefore is this premium given to
@@ -3221,7 +3186,7 @@ After the birth of Commodus, in 161, he presented him alone to the
people, although he had a twin-brother: he frequently took him in his
arms and renewed this act, which was a sort of proclamation. In 166
Lucius Verus demanded that the two sons of Marcus, Commodus and Annius
-Verus, should be made Caesars. In 172 Commodus shared with his father the
+Verus, should be made Cæsars. In 172 Commodus shared with his father the
title of Germanicus. In 173, after the repression of the revolt of
Avidius, the Senate, in order to recognize in some way the family
disinterestedness which Marcus Aurelius had shown, demanded by
@@ -3362,7 +3327,7 @@ revolution, no change, no discovery, will have power to affect it.
Typos corrected:
pg 32 "Pysche" --> "Psyche"
pg 54 "apochryphal" --> "apocryphal"
- pg 95 "Judean" --> "Judaean" (2 occurrences)
+ pg 95 "Judean" --> "Judæan" (2 occurrences)
pg 109 "Mithracism" --> "Mithraicism"
pg 150 "ctizens" --> "citizens"
@@ -3371,367 +3336,7 @@ revolution, no change, no discovery, will have power to affect it.
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of English Conferences of Ernest Renan, by
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of English Conferences of Ernest Renan, by
Ernest Renan
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLISH CONFERENCES ***
-
-***** This file should be named 42865.txt or 42865.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/4/2/8/6/42865/
-
-Produced by Charlene Taylor, Michael Seow and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
-http://gutenberg.org/license).
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
-http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
-809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
-business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
-information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
-page at http://pglaf.org
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit http://pglaf.org
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- http://www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 42865 ***
diff --git a/42865-8.txt b/42865-8.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index e75be9f..0000000
--- a/42865-8.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3737 +0,0 @@
-Project Gutenberg's English Conferences of Ernest Renan, by Ernest Renan
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-
-Title: English Conferences of Ernest Renan
- Rome and Christianity. Marcus Aurelius
-
-Author: Ernest Renan
-
-Translator: Clara Erskine Clement
-
-Release Date: June 3, 2013 [EBook #42865]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLISH CONFERENCES ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Charlene Taylor, Michael Seow and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ENGLISH CONFERENCES
- OF
- ERNEST RENAN.
-
- ROME AND CHRISTIANITY.
- MARCUS AURELIUS.
-
- TRANSLATED BY
- CLARA ERSKINE CLEMENT.
-
- [Illustration]
-
- BOSTON:
- JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY.
- 1880.
-
-
-
-
- Copyright, 1880,
- By JAMES R. OSGOOD & COMPANY.
-
- Franklin Press:
- Stereotyped and Printed by
- Rand, Avery, & Co.,
- Boston.
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS.
-
-
- PAGE.
-
- The Hibbert Conferences.
-
- _First Conference._ The Sense in which Christianity
- is a Roman Work 9
-
- _Second Conference._ The Legend of the Roman
- Church.--Peter and Paul 39
-
- _Third Conference._ Rome, the Centre of the Formation
- of Ecclesiastical Authority 73
-
- _Fourth Conference._ Rome, the Capital of Catholicism 103
-
- The Royal Institution Conference.
-
- Marcus Aurelius 139
-
-
-
-
-NOTE.
-
-
-The lectures contained in this volume were delivered by M. Ernest Renan
-in London during April of the present year. The first four, upon "Rome
-and Christianity," were given under the auspices of "The Hibbert
-Foundation," in response to an invitation under which the distinguished
-author visited England. The fifth, "Marcus Aurelius," was incidental to
-the visit, and was given before "The Royal Institution." The word
-"Conferences," though somewhat new to English usage in its present
-sense, has been retained as best expressing the author's original title,
-"_Conferences d'Angleterre_."
-
-
-
-
- ROME AND CHRISTIANITY.
-
- FIRST CONFERENCE,
-
- London, April 6, 1880.
-
- THE SENSE IN WHICH CHRISTIANITY
- IS A ROMAN WORK.
-
-
-
-
-FIRST CONFERENCE.
-
-THE SENSE IN WHICH CHRISTIANITY IS A ROMAN WORK.
-
-
-Ladies and Gentlemen,--I was proud and happy to receive from the
-curators of this noble institution an invitation to continue here an
-instruction inaugurated by my illustrious confrère and friend, Max
-Müller, the usefulness of which will be more and more appreciated. A
-broad and sincere thought always bears fruit. It is thirty years since
-the venerable Robert Hibbert made a legacy for the purpose of aiding the
-progress of enlightened Christianity, inseparable, according to his
-idea, from the progress of science and reason. Wisely carried out, this
-foundation has become, in the hands of intelligent administrators, the
-centre of conferences upon all the great chapters of the history of
-religion and humanity: the promoters of this reform have asked, with
-reason, why the method which has proved good in all departments of
-intellectual culture should not also be good in the domain of religion?
-why the pursuit of truth, without regard to consequences, should be
-dangerous in theology, when it is approved of in the entire domain of
-social and natural science? You believed the truth, gentlemen, and you
-were right. There is but one truth; and we are wanting in respect to its
-revelation, if we allow that the critic ought to soften his severe
-processes when he treats of it. No, gentlemen, the truth is able to
-dispense with compliments. I come gladly at your call; for I understand
-the duties towards the right exactly as you do. With you, I should
-believe that I injured a faith in admitting that it required to be
-treated with a certain softness. I believe with you that the worship due
-from man to the ideal consists in independent scientific research,
-without regard to results, and that the true manner of rendering homage
-to the truth is to pursue it without ceasing, with the firm resolution
-of sacrificing all to it. You desire that these conferences shall
-present a great historic _ensemble_ of the efforts which the human race
-has made to resolve the problems which surround it, and affect its
-destiny. In the present state of the human mind, no one can hope to
-resolve these problems: we suspect all dogmatism simply because it is
-dogmatism. We grant willingly that a religious or philosophical system
-can, indeed, or that it ought to, enclose a certain portion of truth;
-but we deny to it, without examination, the possibility of enclosing the
-absolute truth. What we love is history. History well written is always
-good; for, even if it should prove that man in seeking to seize the
-infinite has pursued a chimera, the history of these attempts, more
-generous than successful, will always be useful. It proves, that, in
-reality, man goes beyond the circle of his limited life through his
-aspirations. It shows what energy he has expended for the sake of his
-love of the good and true; it teaches us to estimate him,--this poor
-disinherited one, who, in addition to the sufferings which nature
-imposes upon him, imposes still further upon himself the torture of the
-unknown, the torture of doubt, the severe resistances of virtue, the
-abstinences of austerity, the voluntary sufferings of the ascetic. Is
-all this a pure loss? Is this unceasing effort to attain the
-unattainable as vain as the course of the child who pursues the ever
-flying object of his desire? It pains me to believe it; and the faith
-which eludes me when I examine in detail each of the systems scattered
-throughout the world, I find, in a measure, when I reflect upon all
-these systems together. All religions may be defective and incomplete;
-religion in humanity is nothing less than divine, and a mark of superior
-destiny. No, they have not labored in vain--those grand founders, those
-reformers, those prophets of all ages--who have protested against the
-false evidences of gross materialism, who have beaten themselves
-against the wall of the apparent fatality that encloses us; who have
-employed their thought, given their life, for the accomplishment of a
-mission which the spirit of their age had imposed upon them. If the fact
-of the existence of the martyrs does not prove the exclusive truth of
-this or that sect (all sects can show a rich martyrology), this fact in
-general proves that religious zeal responds to something mysterious.
-All,--as many as we are,--we are sons of martyrs. Those who talk the
-most of scepticism are frequently the most satisfied and indifferent.
-Those who have founded among you religious and political liberty, those
-who have founded in all Europe liberty of thought and research, those
-who have labored for the amelioration of the fate of men, those who will
-doubtless find means for further amelioration, have suffered, or will
-suffer, for their good work; for no one is ever recompensed for what he
-does for the good of humanity. Nevertheless they will always have
-imitators. There will always be some to carry on the work of the
-incorrigibles; some, possessed of the divine spirit, who will sacrifice
-their personal interest to truth and justice. Be it so: they have chosen
-the better part. I know not what assures me that he who, without knowing
-why, through simple nobility of nature, has chosen for himself in this
-world the essentially unproductive lot of doing good, is the true sage,
-and has discovered the legitimate use of life with more sagacity than
-the selfish man.
-
-
-I.
-
-You have asked me to retrace before you one of those pages of religious
-history which places the thoughts which I come to express in their
-fullest aspect. The origins of Christianity form the most heroic episode
-in the history of humanity. Man never drew from his heart more devotion,
-more love of the ideal, than in the one hundred and fifty years which
-elapsed from the sweet Galilean vision, under Tiberius, to the death of
-Marcus Aurelius. The religious consciousness was never more eminently
-creative, and never laid down with more authority the law of the future.
-This extraordinary movement, to which no other can be compared, came
-forth from the bosom of Judaism. But it is doubtful if Judaism alone
-would have conquered the world. It was necessary that a young and bold
-school, coming out of its midst, should take the audacious part of
-renouncing the largest portion of the Mosaic ritual. It was necessary,
-above all, that the new movement should be transported into the midst of
-the Greeks and Latins, while awaiting the Barbarians, and become like
-yeast in the bosom of those European races by which humanity
-accomplishes its destinies. What a beautiful subject he will discourse
-upon who shall one day explain to you the part which Greece took in that
-great common work! You have commissioned me to show to you the part of
-Rome. The action of Rome is the first in date. It was scarcely until the
-beginning of the third century that the Greek genius, with Clement of
-Alexandria and Origen, really seized upon Christianity. I hope to show
-you, that, since the second century, Rome has exercised a decisive
-influence upon the Church of Jesus.
-
-In one sense, Rome has diffused religion through the world, as she has
-diffused civilization, as she has founded the idea of a central
-government, extending itself over a considerable part of the world. But
-even as the civilization which Rome has diffused has not been the small,
-narrow, austere culture of ancient Latium, but in fact the grand and
-large civilization which Greece created, so the religion to which she
-definitely lent her support was not the niggardly superstition which was
-sufficient to the rude and primitive inhabitants of the Palatine: it was
-Judaism, that is to say, in fact, the religion which Rome scorned and
-hated most, that which two or three times she believed herself to have
-finally vanquished to the profit of her own national worship. This
-ancient religion of Latium, which contented a race endowed with narrow
-intellectual wants and morals, among which customs and social rank
-almost held the place of a religion during some centuries, was a
-sufficiently despicable thing. As M. Boissier has perfectly proved, a
-more false conception of the divinity was never seen. In the Roman
-worship, as in most of the ancient Italiote worships, prayer was a magic
-formula, acting by its own virtue, independent of the moral dispositions
-of him who prayed. People prayed only for a selfish end. There exist
-some registers called _indigitamenta_, containing lists of the gods who
-supply all the wants of men; thus there was no need of being deceived.
-If the god was not addressed by his true name, by that under which it
-pleased him to be invoked, he was capable of misapprehension, or of
-interpreting capriciously. Now these gods, who are in some degree the
-forces of the world, are innumerable. There was a little god who made
-the infant utter his first cry (_Vaticanus_); there was another who
-presided over his first word (_Fabulinus_); another who taught the baby
-to eat (_Educa_); another who taught him to drink (_Potina_); another
-who made him keep quiet in his cradle (_Cuba_). In truth, the good wife
-of Petronius was right, when, in speaking of the Campagna, she said,
-"This country is so peopled with divinities, that it is easier to find a
-god than a man." Besides these, there were unending series of
-allegories, or deified abstractions, Fear, the Cough, Fever, Manly
-Fortune, Patrician Chastity, Plebeian Chastity, the Security of the Age,
-the Genius of the Customs (or of the _octroi_), and above all (listen,
-that one who, to say the truth, was the great god of Rome), the Safety
-of the Roman People. It was a civil religion in the full force of the
-term. It was essentially the religion of the State. There was no
-priesthood distinct from the functions of the State: the State was the
-veritable god of Rome. The father had there the right of life and death
-over his son; but if this son had the least function, and the father met
-him in his path, he descended from his horse, and bent himself before
-him.
-
-The consequence of this essentially political character was, that the
-Roman religion remained always an aristocratic religion. A man became
-pontiff as he became prætor or consul. When a man desired these
-religious functions, he submitted to no examination; he went into no
-retreat in a seminary; he did not ask himself whether he had the
-ecclesiastical vocation: he proved that he had served his country well,
-and that he had been wounded in a certain battle. There was no
-sacerdotal spirit. These civil pontiffs remained cold, practical men,
-and had not the least idea that their functions should separate them
-from the world. The religion of Rome is, in every respect, the inversion
-of theocracy. Civil law rules acts: it does not trouble itself with
-thoughts; thus did the Roman religion. Rome never had the least idea of
-dogma. The exact observation of the rites commanded by the divinity, in
-which it did not regard piety or the sentiments of the heart, if the
-request was in form, was all that was required. Even more,--devotion was
-a fault; calmness, order, regularity, only, were necessary: more than
-that was an excess (_superstitio_). Cato absolutely forbade that a slave
-should be allowed to conceive any sentiment of piety. "Know," said he,
-"that it is the master who sacrifices for all the household." It was not
-needful to neglect what was due to the gods; but it was not needful to
-give them more than was due: that was superstition, of which the true
-Roman had as much horror as of impiety.
-
-Was there ever, I ask you, a religion less capable of becoming the
-religion of the human race than that? Not only was the access to the
-priesthood for a long time forbidden to the plebeians, but they were
-also excluded from the public worship. In the great struggle for civil
-equality which fills the history of Rome, religion is the great argument
-with which the revolutionists are opposed. "How," say they, "could you
-become a prætor or consul? You have not the right to take the omens."
-Above all, the people were very little attached to religion. Each
-popular victory was followed, as one may say, by an anti-clerical
-re-action: on the contrary, the aristocracy remained always faithful to
-a worship which gave a divine sanction to its privileges.
-
-The matter became still more pressing when the Roman people, by their
-manly, patriotic virtues, had conquered all the nations upon the borders
-of the Mediterranean. What interest, think you an African, a Gaul, a
-Syrian, took in a worship which concerned only a small number of high
-and often tyrannical families? The local religions were continued
-everywhere; but Augustus, who was still more a religious organizer than
-a great politician, made the Roman idea to hover everywhere by the
-establishment of the Roman worship. The altars of Rome and of Augustus
-became the centre of a hierarchical organization of Flamens and Augustan
-_Sevirs_, who served to found, more than one imagines, the divisions of
-the dioceses and ecclesiastical provinces. Augustus admitted all the
-local gods as Lares; he allowed more than the number of Lares in each
-house; at each cross-road an additional Lare was placed,--the Genius of
-the Emperor. Thanks to this fellowship, all the local gods and all the
-special gods became "Augustan gods." It was a great advance. But this
-grand attempt of the worship of the Roman State was notoriously
-insufficient to satisfy the religious needs of the heart. There was
-elsewhere a god who could not accommodate himself in any way to this
-fraternity: it was the God of the Jews. It was impossible to make
-Jehovah pass for a Lare, and associate with the Genius of the Emperor.
-It was evident that a conflict must be established between the Roman
-State and this unchangeable and refractory God, who did not bend to the
-complaisant transformations exacted by the politics of the times.
-
-Ah, well! behold the most extraordinary historical phenomenon, the most
-intense irony of all history: it is that the worship which Rome has
-diffused through the world is not in the least the old worship of
-Jupiter Capitolinus, or Latiaris, still less the worship of Augustus and
-of the Genius of the Emperor: it is, in truth, the worship of Jehovah.
-It is Judaism in its Christian form that Rome has propagated, without
-wishing it, in so powerful a manner, that, from a certain epoch,
-Romanism and Christianity have become almost synonymous words.
-
-Truly, I repeat it, it is more than doubtful if pure Judaism--that which
-is developed under the Talmudical form, and which is still in our day so
-powerful--would have had this extraordinary fortune. Judaism propagates
-itself through Christianity. But one understands nothing of religious
-history (some one, I hope, will demonstrate it to you some day), unless
-it is fixed as a fundamental principle that Christianity had its origin
-in Judaism itself,--Judaism with its fruitful principles of alms and
-charity, with its absolute confidence in the future of humanity, with
-that joy of the heart of which it has always had the secret,--only
-Judaism freed from some observances and distinctive traits which had
-been invented to characterize the special religion of the children of
-Israel.
-
-
-II.
-
-If one studies in fact the progress of the primitive Christian missions,
-he remarks that they are all directed towards the West: in other words,
-they take the Roman Empire as their theatre and limit. If one excepts
-some small portions of the vassal territory of the Arsacidæ, lying
-between the Euphrates and the Tigris, the empire of the Parthians
-received no Christian missions during the first century. The Tigris was
-an eastern boundary which Christianity did not pass under the Sassanidæ.
-Two great causes--the Mediterranean and the Roman Empire--determined
-this capital fact.
-
-The Mediterranean had been, during a thousand years, the great route on
-which all civilizations and all ideas had passed each other. The Romans,
-having freed it from piracy, had made it an unequalled way of
-communication. It was in a sense the railroad of that time. A numerous
-marine of coasting-vessels rendered the voyages along the borders of
-this great lake very easy. The relative security which the routes of the
-empire afforded, the sure guaranties found in the public powers, the
-scattering of the Jews over all the coasts of the Mediterranean, the use
-of the Greek tongue in the eastern portion of this sea, the unity of
-civilization which the Greeks first, and then the Romans, had created,
-made the map of the empire also the map of the countries reserved to the
-Christian missions and destined to become Christian. The Roman _orbis_
-became the Christian _orbis_ in the sense in which it may be said that
-the founders of the empire were the founders of the Christian monarchy,
-or, at least, that they have drawn its outlines. Every province
-conquered by the Roman Empire became a province conquered by
-Christianity. Let the figures of the apostles be imagined in the
-presence of Asia Minor, of Greece, of Italy divided into a hundred
-little republics, of Gaul, of Spain, of Africa, of Egypt, with its old
-national institutions, and their success can no more be thought of, or
-rather it would seem that their project could never have had birth. The
-union of the empire was the necessary preliminary condition of all great
-religious propagandism, placing it above nationalities. The empire
-recognized this in the fourth century. It became Christian. It saw that
-Christianity was the religion which it had accepted without knowing
-it,--the religion limited by its frontiers, identified with it, capable
-of bringing it a second life.
-
-The Church, on its side, made itself entirely Roman, and has remained to
-this day a fragment of the empire. During the middle ages the Church was
-the old Rome, seizing again its authority over the barbarians, imposing
-on them its decretals, as formerly it had imposed its laws, governing
-them by its cardinals, as it had before governed through its imperial
-legates and proconsuls.
-
-In creating its vast empire, Rome imposed, then, the material condition
-of the propagation of Christianity. She raised up, above all, the moral
-state which served as an atmosphere and a medium for the new doctrine.
-While destroying politics everywhere, it created what may be called
-socialism and religion. At the close of the frightful wars which for
-some centuries had rent the world, the empire had an era of prosperity
-and of welfare such as it had never known: we may even be permitted to
-add (without a paradox) liberty. Liberty of thought, at least, increased
-under this new _régime_. This liberty is often more prosperous under a
-king or a prince than under the jealous and narrow-minded plebeian. The
-ancient republics did not have it. The Greeks did great things without
-it, thanks to the incomparable power of their genius; but it must not be
-forgotten that Athens had a fine and noble Inquisition. The king Archon
-was the inquisitor; the royal Portico was the holy office in which the
-accusations of impiety were adjudged. These were the cases in which the
-Attic orators were most frequently engaged. Not only philosophical
-crimes, such as the denial of God or of a Providence, but the lightest
-attaint of the municipal worship, the preaching of strange religions,
-the most puerile infractions of the scrupulous legislation of the
-mysteries, were crimes guilty of death. The gods whom Aristophanes
-mocked on the stage sometimes destroyed. They destroyed Socrates; they
-failed to kill Alcibiades. Anaxagoras, Protagoras, Diagoras of Melas,
-Prodicus of Ceos, Stilpo, Aristotle, Theophrastus, Aspasia, Euripides,
-were more or less seriously disturbed. Liberty of thought was, in truth,
-the fruit of the royalties resulting from the Macedonian conquest. It
-was the Attali, the Ptolemies, who first gave to men of thought the
-freedom which no one of the old republics had ever offered them. The
-Roman Empire held to the same traditions. There was under the empire
-more than one arbitrary law against the philosophers; but these always
-resulted from their meddling with political affairs. In the laws of the
-Romans, before the time of Constantine, no clause is found against the
-liberty of thought; in the history of the emperors, no process of
-abstract doctrine. No _savant_ was disturbed in his researches. Men
-whom the middle ages would have burned, such as Galen, Lucian, Plotinus,
-lived tranquilly, protected by law. The empire inaugurated a period of
-liberty in the sense that it destroyed the absolute sovereignty of the
-family, the city, the tribe, and replaced or modified these
-sovereignties by those of the State. Now, an absolute power is as much
-more vexatious as the circle in which it is exercised is more narrow.
-The ancient republics, the feudalities, tyrannized over the individual
-much more than did the State. Unquestionably the Roman Empire persecuted
-Christianity severely at times; but at least it did not destroy it. Now
-the republics would have rendered it impossible. Judaism, if it had not
-been under the Roman authority, would have stifled it. It was the Roman
-magistrates who hindered the Pharisees from killing Christianity. Some
-lofty ideas of universal brotherhood--results, in the main, of
-stoicism,--a sort of general sentiment of humanity, were the fruit of
-the least narrow _régime_ and of the least exclusive education to which
-the individual was submitted. The people dreamed of a new era and new
-worlds. The public riches were great; and, in spite of the imperfection
-of the economical doctrines of the time, there was general comfort.
-
-General customs were not such as are often imagined. It is true, that,
-in Rome, all the vices were publicly displayed with a revolting
-cynicism: the spectacles, above all, had introduced a frightful
-corruption. Certain countries, as Egypt, had descended to the lowest
-baseness. But there existed in most of the provinces a middle class, in
-which goodness, conjugal fidelity, the domestic virtues, and uprightness
-were commonly practised. Does there anywhere exist, in a world of honest
-people in small villages, an ideal of family life more charming than
-that which Plutarch has left us? What good fellowship! What sweetness of
-manners! What chaste and attractive simplicity! Chæronea was evidently
-not the only place where life was so pure and so innocent.
-
-The customs, even outside of Rome, were still somewhat cruel, either
-through the remaining spirit of ancient manners, everywhere sanguinary,
-or through the special influence of Roman harshness. But there was
-progress during this period. What sweet and pure sentiment, what feeling
-of melancholy tenderness, has not found expression by the pen of Virgil
-or of Tibullus? The world unbent, lost its ancient severity, and
-acquired some softness and tenderness. Some maxims for humanity were
-spread abroad. Equality and the abstract idea of the rights of man were
-boldly preached by stoicism. Woman became more and more the mistress of
-herself. The precepts for the treatment of slaves were improved. The
-slave was no longer that necessarily grotesque and wicked being which
-the Latin comedy introduced in order to provoke bursts of laughter, and
-whom Cato recommended to be treated as a beast of burden. Now, times are
-much changed. The slave is morally equal to his master: it is admitted
-that he is capable of virtue, of fidelity, of devotion, and he gives
-proofs of it. The prejudices concerning noble birth grow less. Some very
-humane and just laws are made, even under the worst emperors. Tiberius
-was a skilful financier: he founded upon an excellent basis an
-establishment of _crédit foncier_. Nero inaugurated in the system of
-taxation, until then unjust and barbarous, some improvements which shame
-even our own time. Legislation was considerably advanced, while the
-punishment of death was stupidly prodigal. Love of the poor, sympathy
-for all, and almsgiving, came to be considered virtues.
-
-
-III.
-
-Unquestionably I understand and share the indignation of sincere
-liberals against a government which diffused a frightful despotism over
-the world. But is it our fault that the wants of humanity are diverse,
-its aspirations manifold, its aims contradictory? Politics is not every
-thing here below. What the world desired, after those frightful
-butcheries of the earlier centuries, was gentleness, humanity. They had
-enough of heroism: those vigorous goddesses, eternally brandishing their
-spears on the height of the Acropolis, inspired sentiment no longer. The
-earth, as in the time of Cadmus, had swallowed her most noble sons. The
-proud Grecian races had killed each other. The Peloponessus was a
-desert. The sweet voice of Virgil gently took up the cry of humanity,
-peace, pity!
-
-The establishment of Christianity responded to this cry of all tender
-and weary souls. Christianity could only have had birth and expansion in
-a time when there were no longer free cities. If there was any thing
-totally lacking in the founders of the Church, it was patriotism. They
-were not cosmopolites, for the entire planet was to them a place of
-exile: they were idealists in the most absolute sense.
-
-A country is a composition of soul and body. The soul is the souvenirs,
-the legends, the customs, the misfortunes, the hopes, the common
-sorrows: the body is the soil, the race, the language, the mountains,
-the rivers, the characteristic productions. Now, was a people ever more
-wanting in all this than the first Christians? They did not cling to
-Judæa; after a few years they had forgotten Galilee; the glory of Greece
-and Rome was indifferent to them. The countries in which Christianity
-was first established--Syria, Cyprus, and Asia Minor--no longer
-remembered the time when they were free. Greece and Rome, it is true,
-still had a grand national sentiment. At Rome, patriotism survived in a
-few families; in Greece, Christianity flourished only at Corinth,--a
-city which, since its destruction by Mummius, and its reconstruction by
-Cæsar, was the resort of men of all races. The true Greek countries,
-then, as to-day, very jealous, very much absorbed in the memories of
-their past, gave little countenance to the new doctrines: they were
-always lukewarm Christians. On the contrary, those gay, indolent,
-voluptuous countries of Asia and Syria, countries of pleasure, of free
-manners, _de laisser aller_, accustomed to receive life and government
-from others, had nothing to resign in the way of pride and traditions.
-The most ancient capitals of Christianity--Antioch, Ephesus,
-Thessalonica, Corinth, and Rome--were common cities, so to speak, cities
-of the modern type of Alexandria, in which all races met, where that
-marriage between man and the soil, which constitutes a nation, was
-absolutely broken.
-
-The importance given to social questions is always the inverse of
-political pre-occupations. Socialism takes the lead when patriotism
-grows weak. Christianity exploded the social and religious ideas, as was
-inevitable, since Augustus had put an end to political struggles.
-Christianity, if a universal worship, would, like Islamism, in reality
-be the enemy of nationalities. Only centuries, only schisms, could form
-national churches from a religion which was from the beginning a denial
-of all terrestrial countries, which had its birth at an epoch in which
-there were no longer in the world either cities or citizens, and which
-the old and powerful republics of Italy and of Greece would surely have
-expelled as a mortal poison to the State.
-
-And here was one of the causes of the grandeur of the new religion.
-Humanity is a multiform, changeable thing, tormented by conflicting
-desires. _La patrie_ is grand, and the heroes of Marathon and Thermopylæ
-are saints. But one's country is not all here below: one is a man and a
-son of God, before he is a Frenchman, or a German. The kingdom of God,
-an eternal dream which is never destroyed in the heart of man, is a
-protestation against a too exclusive patriotism. The thought of an
-organization of humanity, in view of its greatest happiness and its
-moral amelioration, is legitimate. The State knows, and can only know,
-one thing,--to organize a collective egoism. This is not indifference,
-because egoism is the most powerful and seizable of human motives, but
-is not sufficient. The governments which have rested upon the
-supposition that man is composed of covetous instincts only, have
-deceived themselves. Devotion is as natural as egoism to a true-born
-man. The organization of devotion is religion: let no one hope, then, to
-dispense with religion, or religious associations. Each progression of
-modern society will render this want more imperious.
-
-A great exaltation of religious sentiment was, then, the consequence of
-the _Roman peace_ established by Augustus. Augustus realized it. But I
-ask, What satisfaction could the institutions which Rome dared to
-believe eternal present to the religious wants which were arising?
-Surely almost nothing. All the old worships, of very different origin,
-had one common trait. They shared equally the impossibility of reaching
-a theological teaching, a practical morality, an edifying preaching, a
-pastoral ministry truly fruitful for the people. The Pagan temple, in
-its best time, was the same thing as the synagogue and the church: I
-wish to say the common house, the school, the inn, the hospital, the
-shelter in which the poor sought an asylum, it was a cold _cella_, into
-which one seldom entered, where one learned nothing. The affectation
-which led the Roman patricians to distinguish the "religion," that is to
-say, their own worship, from the "superstition," that is to say, the
-worship of strangers, appears to us puerile. All the Pagan worships were
-essentially superstitious. The peasant who in our day places a sou in
-the box of a miraculous chapel, who invokes some saint on account of his
-oxen, or his horses, who drinks certain waters for certain maladies, is
-in these acts a Pagan. Indeed, nearly all our superstitions are the
-remains of a religion anterior to Christianity, which that has not been
-able to entirely uproot. If one would find the image of Paganism in our
-day, it must be sought in some obscure village in the depth of some
-out-of-the-way country.
-
-Having as guardians a popular, vacillating tradition, and selfish
-sacristans, the Pagan religion could but degenerate in worship.
-Augustus, although with a certain reserve, accepted the adoration of his
-subjects in the provinces. Tiberius allowed, under his own eyes, that
-ignoble concourse of the cities of Asia to dispute the honor of raising
-a temple to him. The extravagant impieties of Caligula produced no
-re-action: outside of Judaism there was not found a single priest to
-resist such follies. Coming forth, for the most part, from a primitive
-worship of natural forces ten times transformed by minglings of all
-sorts, and by the imagination of the peoples, the Pagan worships were
-limited by their past. One could never draw from them what had never
-existed in them,--Deism or instruction. The fathers of the church amuse
-us when they bring to notice the misdeeds of Saturn as the father of a
-family, and of Jupiter as a husband. But without doubt, it was still
-more ridiculous to set up Jupiter (that is to say, the atmosphere) as a
-moral god who commands, defends, rewards, and punishes. In a world which
-aspires to possess a catechism, what could one do with a worship like
-that of Venus, which arose from an old social necessity of the first
-Ph[oe]nician navigation in the Mediterranean, but became in time an
-outrage to that which one regards more and more as the essence of
-religion?
-
-Here is the explanation of that singular attraction, which, towards the
-commencement of our era, drew the populations of the Old World towards
-the worships of the East. These worships had something more profound
-than the Greek and Latin worships: they appealed, moreover, to the
-religious sentiment. Almost all were relative to the state of the soul
-in another life, and they were believed to contain some pledges of
-immortality. From this arose that favor which the Thracian and Sabasian
-mysteries enjoyed, the worshippers of Bacchus, and brotherhoods of all
-sorts. There was less of coldness in these little circles, in which one
-pressed against another, than in the great glacial world elsewhere. Some
-minor religions, like that of Psyche, destined solely to console for
-death, had immense popularity. Those noble Egyptian worships which
-concealed the emptiness within by grand splendor of ceremonies counted
-their devotees throughout the empire. Isis and Serapis had their altars
-at the extremities of the world. In visiting the ruins of Pompeii, one
-would be tempted to believe that the worship of Isis was the principal
-one practised there. Those little Egyptian temples had some assiduous
-devotees, among whom were counted a large number of persons of the class
-of the friends of Catullus and Tibullus. There was a service each
-morning,--a sort of mass, celebrated by a tonsured and beardless priest;
-there were some sprinklings of holy water, and perhaps an evening
-service: it occupied, amused, and quieted. What more is necessary?
-
-But, more than all others, the Mithraic worship enjoyed in the second
-and third centuries an extraordinary popularity. I sometimes allow
-myself to say, that, had not Christianity taken the lead, Mithraicism
-would have become the religion of the world. Mithraicism had mysterious
-re-unions, and chapels which strongly resembled little churches. It
-established a very solid bond of brotherhood between its votaries; it
-had the Eucharist, the Lord's Supper, and bore such a resemblance to the
-Christian mysteries, that the good Justin the Apologist saw only one
-explanation of these resemblances: it is that Satan, in order to deceive
-the human race, sought to mimic the Christian ceremonies, and committed
-this plagiarism. The Mithraic tomb of the Catacombs of Rome is as
-edifying and deeply mysterious as the Christian tombs. There were some
-devoted Mithraists, who, even after the triumph of Christianity,
-defended the sincerity of their faith with courage. The people grouped
-themselves around these foreign gods: around the Greek and Italiote gods
-there were no gatherings. We must say a good word for it: it is only the
-small sects that lay the foundation and build up. It is so sweet to
-believe one's self a little aristocracy of truth, to imagine, that, in
-common with a very few, one owns the repository of truth! Such a foolish
-sect in our own time gives to its adherents more consolation than a more
-healthy philosophy. In his day, Abracadabra secured some joyous
-followers, and, by means of a little good-will, a sublime theology has
-been found in him.
-
- * * * * *
-
-We shall see, however, in our next conference, that the religious reign
-of the future belonged neither to Serapis, nor to Mithra. The
-predestined religion grew imperceptibly in Judæa. This would have
-greatly astonished the most sagacious Romans, if it had been announced
-to them. It would have been shocking to them in the highest degree. But
-so often in history have improbable predictions become true, so often
-has wisdom been mistaken, that it is not best to rely too much upon the
-likes and dislikes of enlightened men, of _bons esprits_ as we say, when
-they undertake to predict the future.
-
-
-
-
- SECOND CONFERENCE,
-
- London, April 9, 1880.
-
- THE LEGEND OF THE ROMAN CHURCH.--PETER
- AND PAUL.
-
-
-
-
-SECOND CONFERENCE.
-
-PETER AND PAUL.
-
-
-Ladies and Gentlemen,--At our last meeting we attempted to show the
-situation of the Roman Empire in regard to religious questions during
-the first century. There was in the vast gathering of populations which
-composed the empire a pressing want of religion, a true moral progress,
-which called for a pure worship without superstitious practices or
-bloody sacrifices; a tendency to Monotheism, which made the old
-mythological recitals appear ridiculous; a general sentiment of sympathy
-and of charity, which inspired the desire of association, of assembling
-together for prayer, for support, for consolation, for the assurance
-that after death one would be interred by his brethren, who would also
-make a little feast in his memory. Asia Minor, Greece, Syria, and Egypt
-contained masses of the poor,--very honest men, after their manner,
-humble, and without distinction; but revolted at the spectacle which the
-Roman aristocracy made, full of horror at those hideous representations
-in the theatres, in which Rome made a diversion of suffering. The moral
-conscience of the human race sent up an immense protestation, and there
-was no priest to interpret it, no pitying God to reply to the sighs of
-poor suffering humanity. Slavery, in spite of the protestations of the
-sages, remained very cruel. Claudius thought to do a grand and humane
-act in making a law that the master who should drive from his house an
-old and sick slave should lose his right in that slave, if he were
-cured. How could gods without compassion, and born of joy and the
-primitive imagination, be expected to console for such evils? A Father
-in heaven was required, who kept a record of the efforts of man, and
-promised him a recompense. A future of justice was desired, in which the
-earth belonged to the feeble and the poor. The assurance was necessary,
-that, when a man suffered, it was not an entire loss, and that beyond
-those sad horizons, veiled by tears, there were happy fields in which
-one day he should console himself for his sorrows. Judaism indeed had
-all that. By the institution of the synagogues (do not forget,
-gentlemen, that it is from the synagogue that the church comes), it
-established association in the most powerful form in which it had ever
-been realized. In appearance, at least, the worship was pure Deism; no
-images, only scorn and sarcasm for idols. But that which above all
-characterized the Jew was his confidence in a brilliant and happy
-future for humanity. Having no idea based upon the immortality of the
-soul, nor upon the remunerations and punishments beyond the tomb, the
-Jew, disciple of the ancient prophet, was as if intoxicated with the
-sentiment of justice: he wished justice now upon earth. Having little
-confidence in the assurances of the eternity which made the Christians
-so easily resigned, the Jew grumbled at Jehovah, reproached him with his
-ignorance, and demanded how he could leave the earth so long in the
-power of the impious. As for himself, he did not doubt that the earth
-would one day be his, and that his law would make love and justice to
-reign therein.
-
-In this struggle, gentlemen, the Jew will be victorious. Hope, that
-which the Jew calls the _Tiqva_, that assurance of something which
-nothing proves, but to which one attaches himself with so much the more
-frenzy because it is not sure, is the soul of the Jew. His psalms were
-like the continuous sound of a harp, filling life with harmony and a
-melancholy faith: his prophets held the words of eternity. For example,
-that second Isaiah, the prophet of the captivity, pictured the future
-with more dazzling colors than man had ever seen in his dreams. The
-Thora, besides that, gives the recipe for being happy (for being happy
-here below, I mean), by observing the moral law, the spirit of the
-family, and the spirit of duty.
-
-
-I.
-
-The establishment of the Jews at Rome dated nearly sixty years before
-Jesus Christ. They multiplied rapidly. Cicero represented it as an act
-of courage to dare to oppose them. Cæsar favored them, and found them
-faithful. The people detested them, thought them malevolent, accused
-them of forming a secret society whose members were advanced at any
-price, to the detriment of others. But all did not approve these
-superficial judgments. The Jews had as many friends as detractors:
-something superior was noticeable in them. The poor Jewish colporter of
-the Trastevere often in the evening returned home rich with the
-charities received from a pious hand. Women, above all, were attracted
-by these missionaries in rags. Juvenal counts the weakness towards the
-Jewish religion among the vices of the ladies of his time. The word of
-Zachariah was verified to the letter: the world seized upon the garments
-of the Jews, and said, "Lead us to Jerusalem."
-
-The principal Jewish quarter of Rome was situated beyond the Tiber, that
-is to say, in the poorest and dirtiest part of the city, probably near
-the present _Porta Portese_. There, or rather opposite to the foot of
-the Aventine, the gate of Rome was formerly situated, where the
-merchandise brought from Ostia in barges was discharged. It was a
-quarter of Jews and Syrians,--"nations born for servitude," as Cicero
-said. The nucleus of the Jewish population at Rome was formed, in truth,
-of freedmen, descended, for the most part, from those prisoners whom
-Pompey had carried there. They had passed through slavery, without
-changing their religious customs in the least. That which is admirable
-in Judaism is that simplicity of faith which makes the Jew, transported
-a thousand leagues from his country, at the end of several generations,
-always a very Jew. The intercourse between the synagogues of Rome and
-Jerusalem was continual. The first colony had been re-enforced with
-numerous emigrants. These poor men disembarked by hundreds at the Ripa,
-and lived together in the adjacent quarter of the Trastevere, serving as
-street-porters, engaged in small affairs, exchanging matches for broken
-glasses, and showing to the proud Italiote populations a type which
-later became too familiar to them,--that of the beggar accomplished in
-his art. A Roman who respected himself never placed his foot in these
-abject quarters. It was as a suburb given up to despised classes and to
-infectious employments: the tanneries, the gut-works, the rotting vats
-were banished there. These unhappy people lived tranquilly enough in
-this remote corner, in the midst of bales of merchandise, low inns, and
-porters of manure (_Syri_), who had there their general headquarters.
-The police only entered there when affrays were bloody, or occurred too
-often. Few quarters of Rome were so free: politics had nothing to do
-there. Worship was not only practised there in ordinary times without
-obstacles, but its propagation was also accomplished with great
-facility.
-
-Protected by the disdain which they inspired, caring little, moreover,
-for the railleries of the men of the world, the Jews of the Trastevere
-led a very active religious and social life. They had some schools of
-_hakamin_: nowhere was the ritual and ceremonial of the law observed
-more scrupulously: the organization of the synagogue was the most
-complete ever known. The titles of "father and mother" of the synagogues
-were much prized. Some rich converts took biblical names; they brought
-their slaves into the church with them, they had the Scriptures
-explained by the doctors, built places of prayer, and manifested their
-pride of the consideration which they enjoyed in this little world. The
-poor Jew found the means, while begging with a trembling voice, to
-whisper in the ear of the great Roman lady some words of the law, and
-frequently won over the matron who opened to him her hand full of small
-coin. To observe the sabbath and the Jewish feasts was to Horace the
-trait which classed a man in the crowd of weak minds. The universal
-benevolence, the happiness of reposing with the just, the assistance of
-the poor, the purity of manners, the gentle acceptance of death
-considered as a sleep, are some of the sentiments which are found in the
-Jewish inscriptions, with that particular accent of touching unction, of
-certain hope, which characterizes the Christian inscriptions. There have
-been many rich and powerful Jews in the world, such as Tiberius
-Alexander, who arrived at the greatest honors of the empire, who
-exercised two or three times the strongest influence upon public
-affairs, and even had, to the great grief of the Romans, his statue in
-the Forum; but those were not good Jews. The Herods, though practising
-their worship at Rome with much show, were also far from being true
-Israelites, even if their only sins were their relations with the
-Pagans.
-
-A world of ideas was thus set in motion on the vulgar quay where the
-merchandise of the whole world was piled up; but all that would be lost
-in a great city like Paris. Undoubtedly the proud patricians, who, in
-their promenades on the Aventine, cast their eyes upon the other side of
-the Tiber, did not imagine the future that was forming itself in that
-little cluster of poor houses at the foot of Janiculum.
-
-Near the port was a sort of lodging-house well known to the people and
-the soldiers under the name of _Taberna Meritoria_. In order to attract
-the loungers, a pretended spring of oil coming out of a rock was shown
-there. From a very early time this spring of oil was considered by the
-Christians as symbolic: it was pretended that its appearance was
-coincident with the birth of Jesus. It seems that later the _Taberna_
-became a church. Under Alexander Severus we find the Christians and the
-inn-keepers in a contest over a place which formerly had been public:
-that good emperor gave it to the Christians. This is probably the origin
-of the Church of the Santa Maria of the Trastevere.
-
-It is natural that the capital should have fully accepted the name of
-Jesus before the intermediate countries could be evangelized, as a high
-summit is lighted up while the valleys between it and the sun are still
-obscure. Rome was the rendezvous for all the Oriental worships,--the
-point upon the coast of the Mediterranean with which the Syrians had the
-most intercourse. They arrived there in enormous bands. Like all the
-poor populations rising for the assault of the great cities to which
-they come to seek their fortunes, they were serviceable and humble. All
-the world spoke Greek. The ancient Roman plebeians, attached to the old
-customs, lost ground each day, drowned as they were in this wave of
-strangers.
-
-We admit then, that towards the year 50 of our era, some Syrian Jews,
-already Christians, entered the capital of the empire, and communicated
-the faith which rendered them happy to their companions. At this time no
-one suspected that the founder of a second empire was in Rome,--a second
-Romulus, lodging at the port in a bed of straw. A little band was
-formed. These ancestors of the Roman prelates were poor, dirty, common
-people, without distinction, without manners, clothed with fetid
-garments, having the bad breath of men who are badly fed. Their
-dwellings had that odor of misery which is exhaled from persons grossly
-clothed and nourished, and huddled together in narrow rooms. We know the
-names of two Jews who were the most prominent in these movements. They
-were Aquila, a Jew, originally from Pontus, who was like St. Paul an
-upholsterer, and Priscilla his wife,--a pious couple. Banished from Rome
-they took refuge at Corinth, where they soon became the intimate friends
-of St. Paul, and zealous workers with him. Thus Aquila and Priscilla are
-the most ancient known members of the Church of Rome. There is scarcely
-a souvenir of them there. Tradition, always unjust, because it is always
-ruled by political motives, has expelled these two obscure workmen from
-the Christian Pantheon in order to attribute the honor of the foundation
-of the Church of Rome to a name more in keeping with its proud
-pretensions. We do not see the original point of the origin of
-Occidental Christianity in the theatrical Basilica consecrated to St.
-Peter: it is at that ancient _Ghetto_, the _Porta Portese_. It is in
-tracing these poor vagabond Jews, who bore with them the religion of the
-world,--these suffering men, dreaming in their misery of the kingdom of
-God,--that we shall find it again. We do not dispute with Rome its
-essential title. Rome was probably the first point in the Western World,
-and even in Europe, where Christianity was established.
-
-But, instead of these lofty basilicas, in place of these insulting
-devices,--_Christus vincit_, _Christus regnat_, _Christus imperat_,--it
-would be better to raise a poor chapel to these good Jews who first
-pronounced on the quay of Rome the name of Jesus.
-
-A capital trait, which it is important to note in any case, is, that the
-Church of Rome was not, like the churches of Asia Minor, Macedonia, and
-Greece, a foundation of the school of Paul. It was fundamentally
-Judæan-Christian, re-attaching itself directly to the Church of
-Jerusalem. Paul here will never be on his own ground: he will find in
-this great church many weaknesses which he will treat with indulgence,
-but which will wound his exalted idealism. Attached to circumcision and
-outward observances, Ebionite through its taste for abstinences, and by
-its doctrine concerning the person and death of Jesus more Jewish than
-Christian, leaning strongly towards Millenarianism, the Roman Church
-showed, since its first days, the essential traits which will
-distinguish it through its long history. Own daughter of Jerusalem, the
-Roman Church will always have an ascetic, sacerdotal character, opposed
-to the Protestant tendencies of Paul. Peter will be its veritable head;
-then, the political and hierarchical spirit of old Rome penetrating it,
-it will indeed become the new Jerusalem, the city of the Pontificate, of
-the hieratic and solemn religion, of the material sacraments which
-justify of themselves, the city of the ascetics of the manner of Jacques
-Ohliam with his callous knees and his plate of gold upon his brow. It
-will be the authoritative church. If we can believe it, the only mark of
-the apostolic mission will be to show a letter signed by the apostles,
-to produce a certificate of orthodoxy. The good and the evil which the
-Church of Jerusalem did in giving birth to Christianity, the Church of
-Rome will do for the Universal Church. It is in vain that Paul will
-address to it his beautiful epistle to explain the mystery of the cross
-of Jesus and of salvation by faith alone. The Church of Rome will
-scarcely comprehend it; but Luther four and a half centuries later will
-comprehend it, and will open a new era in a secular series of the
-alternate triumphs of Peter and Paul.
-
-
-II.
-
-An important event in the history of the world took place in the year
-61. Paul was led a prisoner to Rome in order to follow up the appeal
-which he had made to the tribunal of the emperor. A sort of profound
-instinct had always made Paul desire this journey. His arrival at Rome
-was almost as marked an event in his life as his conversion. He believed
-that he had attained the summit of his apostolic life; and doubtless he
-recalled the dream in which, after one of his days of struggle, Christ
-had appeared to him, and said, "Be of good cheer, Paul; for as thou hast
-testified of me in Jerusalem, so must thou bear witness also at Rome."
-
-You will not forget the wide divisions which separated the disciples
-of Jesus during the first century from the foundation of
-Christianity,--divisions so broad, that all the differences which to-day
-separate the orthodox, the heretics, and the schismatics of the whole
-world, are nothing beside the dissensions of Peter and Paul. The Church
-of Jerusalem, obstinately attached to Judaism, refused all intercourse
-with the uncircumcised, however pious they might be. Paul, on the
-contrary, thought that to maintain the ancient law was an injury to
-Jesus, since thus it might be supposed, that, outside the merits of
-Jesus, such or such a work could serve for the justification of the
-faithful. However strange it may appear, it is certain that the
-Judæan-Christians of Jerusalem, with James at their head, organized some
-active contra-missions in order to combat the effect of the missions of
-Paul, and that the emissaries of these ardent conservatives followed in
-some sort the lead of the apostle of the Gentiles. Peter belonged to the
-party at Jerusalem, but showed in his conduct that sort of timid
-moderation which seems to have been the foundation of his character. Did
-Peter also come to Rome? Formerly, gentlemen, this question was one of
-the most exciting which could be agitated. Formerly the history of
-religion was written, not to recount it, but in order to prove it:
-religious history was an annex of theology. During the grand revolt, so
-full of courage and of ardent conviction, which, during the sixteenth
-century, placed one-half of Europe in opposition to Rome, the negation
-of the sojourn of Peter at Rome became a sort of dogma. The Bishop of
-Rome is the successor of St. Peter, said the Catholics, and as such the
-head of Christendom. How could that reasoning be more strongly refuted
-than by maintaining that Peter never placed his foot in Rome?
-
-As for us, we are permitted to regard this question with the most
-perfect disinterestedness. We do not believe, in any sense, that Jesus
-intended to give any head whatever to his church; and above all, it is
-doubtful whether the idea of such a church as developed later had
-existed in the mind of the founder of Christianity. The word _ecclesia_
-occurs only in the Gospel of St. Matthew. The idea of the _episcopos_,
-as it existed in the second century, had no place in the mind of Jesus.
-He himself was the living _episcopos_ during his brief Galilean
-appearance: from that time it is the Spirit who inspires each one until
-he may return. In any case, if it had been possible that Jesus should
-have had any idea whatever of the _ecclesia_ and _episcopos_, it is
-absolutely beyond doubt, that Jesus never thought of giving the future
-_episcopos_ of the city of Rome to be the head of his church,--that
-impious city, the centre of all the impurities of the earth, of whose
-existence he perhaps knew scarcely any thing, and of which he should
-have entertained the gloomy opinions which all the Jews professed. If
-there is any thing in the world which was not instituted by Jesus, it is
-the Papacy, that is to say, the idea that the Church is a monarchy. We
-are, then, perfectly at liberty to discuss the question of Peter's
-coming to Rome. This question is absolutely without consequence for us;
-and from our solution the only result will be to say whether Leo XIII.
-is or is not the head of the Christian conscience. Whether Peter was or
-was not in Rome, it has for us no political nor moral bearing. It is a
-curious question of history: it is useless to pursue it further.
-
-First, let us say, that the Catholics have laid themselves open to the
-peremptory objections of their adversaries by their unfortunate
-reckoning of the coming of Peter to Rome in the year 42,--a reckoning
-borrowed from Eusebius and St. Jerome, which extends the duration of the
-pontificate of Peter to twenty-three or twenty-four years. There is
-nothing more inadmissible. In order to leave no doubt in regard to this,
-it is sufficient to consider that the persecution of Peter at Jerusalem
-by Herod Agrippa occurred in the year 44. It would be superfluous to
-oppose longer a thesis which can have no one reasonable defence. It is
-possible, in fact, to go much further, and to affirm that Peter had not
-yet come to Rome when Paul was taken there, that is to say, in the year
-61. The Epistle of Paul to the Romans, written about the year 58, is a
-very considerable argument here. One can scarcely imagine St. Paul
-writing to the faithful, of whom St. Peter was the head, without making
-the least mention of the latter. The last chapter of the Acts of the
-Apostles is still more demonstrative. This chapter, especially from the
-seventeenth to the twenty-ninth verse, cannot be explained, if Peter
-was at Rome when Paul arrived there. Let us, then, consider it
-absolutely certain that Peter did not come to Rome before Paul, that is
-to say, before or about the year 61.
-
-But did he not come there after Paul? This has never been positively
-proved; this late journey of Peter's to Rome was not only probable, but
-there are strong arguments in its favor. Besides the testimony of the
-Fathers of the second and third centuries, there are three reasons which
-do not appear to me unworthy:--
-
-1st, It is indisputably certain that Peter suffered a martyr's death.
-The testimony of the fourth evangelist, of Clement Romanus, of the
-fragment which is called the "_Canon de Muratori_," of Denis of Corinth,
-of Caius, of Tertullian, leave no doubt in this respect. Let the fourth
-Gospel be apocryphal, allow that chapter xxi. has been added in later
-times, it makes no difference. It is clear, that, in the verses in which
-Jesus announces to Peter that he shall die by the same suffering as his
-own, we have the expression of an opinion established in the Church
-about 120 or 130, to which allusions are made as to a fact known to all.
-Now, it is not possible to imagine that Peter died a martyr outside of
-Rome. It was only at Rome, in fact, that the persecution of Nero was
-violent. At Jerusalem, at Antioch, the martyrdom of Peter would have
-been much less probable.
-
-2d, The second reason is found in the Epistle attributed to St. Peter
-(v. 13): "The church that is at Babylon ... saluteth you." Babylon, in
-this passage, evidently indicates Rome. If the Epistle is authentic, the
-passage is decisive: if it is apocryphal, the conclusion to be drawn
-from the text is not weakened. The author, in short, whoever he may be,
-wishes it to be regarded as the work of Peter. He was consequently
-forced, in order to give an appearance of truth to his fraud, to arrange
-the circumstances which he related, according to what he knew, or
-believed was known in his time, of the life of Peter. If, in such a
-spirit, he dated the letter at Rome, it shows, that, in his day, it was
-the general opinion that Peter had resided at Rome. But, in any case,
-the First Epistle of Peter is a very ancient work, and had very early a
-high authority.
-
-3d, The theory which is founded upon the Ebionite Acts of St. Peter is
-also worthy of much consideration. This theory represents St. Peter as
-following Simon the Magician everywhere (according to St. Paul), in
-order to dispute his false doctrines. M. Lipsius has shown an admirable
-critical sagacity in his analysis of this legend. He has shown that the
-base of all the different versions of it which have come to us was
-written about the year 130. It seems improbable that an Ebionite author
-of such early date could have given so much importance to Peter's
-journey to Rome, if this journey had not taken place in reality. The
-theory of the Ebionite legend must contain some truth at the bottom, in
-spite of the fables which are mingled with it. It is quite admissible
-that St. Peter might have come to Rome, as he went to Antioch, following
-St. Paul, and in part to neutralize his influence. The missions of St.
-Paul, and the facility which the Jews had acquired in their voyages had
-made long expeditions quite the custom. The apostle Philip is even
-represented by an ancient and persistent tradition as having settled
-himself in Hierapolis, in Asia Minor.
-
-I regard, then, as probable, the tradition of the sojourn of Peter at
-Rome; but I believe that this sojourn was short, and that Peter suffered
-martyrdom soon after his arrival in the Eternal City.
-
-
-III.
-
-You know the mystery which hovers above the history of primitive
-Christianity, which we might desire to know more in detail. The death of
-the apostles Peter and Paul remains enveloped in a veil which will never
-be penetrated. That which appears the most probable is, that they both
-disappeared in the great massacre of Christians commanded by Nero.
-
-On the 19th of July, in the year 64, a violent fire burst out at Rome.
-It originated in that portion of the great Circus near to the Palatine
-and C[oe]lian Hills. In this quarter there were many little shops,
-filled with inflammable matter, in which the flames spread with
-prodigious rapidity. Thence it made the turn of the Palatine, ravaged
-the Velabra, the Forum, the Carinæ, ascended the hills, greatly injured
-the Palatine, descended again to the valleys, devouring compact
-quarters, and piercing tortuous streets, continuing six days and seven
-nights. An enormous pile of houses which were torn down near the foot of
-the Esquiline, arrested its progress for a time; then it again broke
-out, and endured three days more. A considerable number of people
-perished. Of the fourteen portions which composed the city, three were
-entirely destroyed; of seven, only blackened walls remained. Rome was an
-extremely compact city, and the population very dense. This disaster was
-frightful, and the like of it had never before been seen.
-
-When the fire broke out, Nero was at Antium. He returned to the city
-about the time when it approached his "transitory" house. It was not
-possible to arrest the flames. The imperial houses of the Palatine, the
-"transitory" house itself with its dependencies, and the whole
-surrounding quarter, were destroyed. Nero did not seem much to regret
-the loss of his house. The sublime horror of the spectacle transported
-him. Later it was said that he had watched the fire from a tower, where,
-in a theatrical costume, with a lyre in his hand, he chanted the ruin of
-Ilion to the rhythm of an ancient elegy.
-
-This was a legend, the fruit of a period of successive exaggerations;
-but one point upon which the universal opinion was decisive from the
-first was, that Nero had commanded this fire, or at least had revived it
-when it seemed about to die out.
-
-These suspicions were confirmed by the fact, that, after the fire, Nero,
-under pretext of removing the ruins at his own cost, in order to leave
-the place free to the proprietors, undertook to clear away the _débris_;
-and the people were not allowed to approach. This seemed worse when it
-was seen that he drew from the ruins what belonged to the country, when
-the new palace, that "golden house" which had been the plaything of his
-delirious imagination, was seen rising upon the site of the ancient
-provisory residence, enlarged by the spaces which the fire had cleared.
-
-It was believed that he had desired to prepare the place for his new
-palace, to justify the reconstruction which he had long contemplated, to
-procure money by appropriating the wreck of the fire, in short, to
-satisfy his mad vanity, which led him to desire to rebuild the whole of
-Rome, so that it might date from him, and be called Neropolis.
-
-All the honest men of the city were outraged. The most precious
-antiquities of Rome, the houses of the ancient leaders, decorated with
-triumphal spoils, the most holy objects, the trophies, the ancient
-_ex-votos_, the most revered temples, all the belongings of the old
-worship of the Romans, had disappeared. It was as if they mourned the
-souvenirs and the traditions of the whole country. They celebrated
-expiatory services; they consulted the books of the Sibyl: the ladies
-especially observed various _piacula_. But the secret consciousness of a
-crime and infamy still remained.
-
-Then an infernal idea took possession of the mind of Nero. He cast about
-to see if he could find anywhere some miserable wretches, still more
-detested by the Roman plebeians than himself, upon whom he could rest
-the odium of the incendiarism. He thought of the Christians. The horror
-which they testified towards the temples and the most venerated edifices
-of the Romans made the idea plausible, that they should have been the
-authors of this fire, the result of which was the destruction of these
-sanctuaries. Their air of sadness in regarding the monuments appeared
-like an injury to the nation. Rome was a very religious city, and
-whoever protested against the national worship was at once remarked. It
-should be remembered that certain rigorous Jews went so far as to refuse
-to touch money which bore an effigy: they even saw a great crime in
-bearing or looking at an image, unless engaged in the occupation of
-carving. Others refused to pass beneath a city gate surmounted by a
-statue. All this excited the ridicule and ill-will of the people.
-Perhaps the idea that the Christians were incendiaries gained force from
-their manner of talking about the final conflagration, their sinister
-prophecies, their love of reiterating that the world would soon be
-ended, and ended by fire. It is even admissible that some of the
-faithful might have committed imprudences, and that there were pretexts
-for accusing them of having wished, by anticipating the celestial
-flames, to justify their oracles, at any price. Four and a half years
-later the Apocalypse was to present a chant upon the burning of Rome,
-for which the event of 64 probably furnished more than one feature. The
-destruction of Rome by fire had been a Christian and Jewish dream; and
-it was not merely a dream: the pious sectaries were pleased to see in
-spirit the saints and angels applauding from the heights of heaven what
-they regarded as a just expiation.
-
-A certain number of persons suspected of belonging to the new sect were
-arrested, and thrown into prison, which was of itself a punishment. The
-first arrests were followed by many others. The people were surprised at
-the multitude of converts who had accepted these gloomy doctrines: it
-was only spoken of with alarm. All sensible men considered the
-accusation of having caused the fire as extremely weak. "Their true
-crime," said they, "is hatred of the human race." Although persuaded
-that the burning was the crime of Nero, many serious Romans saw in this
-work of the police a mode of delivering the city from a dreadful
-nuisance. Tacitus, in spite of his pity, was of this opinion. And
-Suetonius counted the sufferings which Nero heaped upon the partisans of
-the new and mischievous superstitions as among his laudable measures.
-
-These sufferings were something frightful. Such refinements of cruelty
-had never been seen. Almost all those arrested were of the _humiliores_
-(the poorest classes). The sentence of these unfortunates, when it
-concerned high treason or sacrilege, was to be thrown to the beasts, or
-to be burned alive in the amphitheatre. One of the most hideous traits
-of Roman manners was that of making a _fête_, a public amusement, of
-these tortures. The amphitheatres had become places of execution: the
-tribunals furnished the victims. The condemned of the entire world were
-forwarded to Rome for the provisionment of the circus and the amusement
-of the people. At this time derision was added to the barbarism of these
-tortures. The victims were kept for a feast day, to which was given,
-without doubt, an expiatory character. "The morning spectacle,"
-consecrated to the combats of animals, presented an appearance hitherto
-unknown. The condemned, covered with the tawny skins of beasts, were
-hurried into the arena, where they were torn by dogs. Some were
-crucified: others, reclothed with tunics steeped in oil, wax, or resin,
-were bound to posts, and reserved to light up the evening _fêtes_. When
-the day lowered, these living torches were ignited. For this spectacle,
-Nero offered his magnificent gardens beyond the Tiber, which occupied
-the site of the present Borgo, the Square, and the Church of St. Peter.
-Near by was a circus commenced by Caligula, in which the middle of the
-_Spina_ was marked by an obelisk brought from Heliopolis (the same one
-which in our day stands in the centre of the Square of St. Peter). This
-place had already been the scene of massacres by the light of torches.
-Caligula, in one of his walks, decapitated a certain number of consular
-personages, senators, and Roman ladies, by the light of torches. The
-idea of replacing lanterns by human bodies impregnated with inflammable
-substances had occurred to the ingenious Nero. Burning alive was not a
-new mode of suffering; it was the ordinary penance of incendiaries: but
-it had never been made a system of illumination. By the light of these
-hideous torches, Nero, who had established the custom of evening
-entertainments, showed himself in the arena, sometimes mingling with the
-people in the dress of a charioteer, sometimes conducting his chariot
-and seeking applause. Women and young girls were involved in these
-horrible games: a _fête_ was made of the nameless indignities which they
-suffered. Under Nero, the custom was established of compelling the
-condemned to play in the amphitheatre some mythological part entailing
-the death of the actor. These hideous operas, where mechanical science
-attained to prodigious effects, were very popular. The miserable wretch
-was introduced into the arena, richly costumed as god or hero devoted to
-death. He then represented by his suffering some tragic scene of the
-fables consecrated by sculptors and poets. Sometimes it was the furious
-Hercules burned on Mount [OE]ta, tearing the waxed tunic from his skin;
-sometimes Orpheus torn in pieces by a bear; Dædalus thrown from heaven,
-and devoured by beasts; Pasiphæ struggling in the embraces of the bull;
-Attys murdered. Sometimes there were horrible masquerades, in which the
-men were dressed like priests of Saturn with a red cloak, the women as
-priestesses of Ceres with fillets on the brow; finally, at other times,
-some dramatic work of the time, in which the hero was really condemned
-to death as Laureolus; or the representations were those of such tragic
-acts as that of Mucius Scævola. At the end of these hideous spectacles,
-Mercury, with a red-hot iron wand, touched each corpse to see if it
-moved. Some masked valets, dressed like Pluto or Orcus, dragged away the
-dead by the feet, killing with hammers all who still breathed. The
-Christian ladies of the highest respectability even suffered these
-monstrosities. Some played the _rôle_ of the Danaïdes, others that of
-Dirce. It is difficult to say what fable furnishes a more bloody picture
-than that of the Danaïdes. The suffering which all mythological
-tradition attributes to these guilty women was not cruel enough to
-suffice for the pleasure of Nero and the _habitués_ of his amphitheatre.
-Sometimes they were led out bearing urns, and received the fatal blow
-from an actor figuring as Lynceus. Sometimes these unhappy beings went
-through the series of the sufferings of Tartarus before the spectators,
-and only died after hours of torments. The representations of Hell were
-quite _à la mode_. Some years previous (the year 41), some Egyptians and
-Nubians came to Rome, and made a great success in giving evening
-performances, in which they displayed in order the horrors of the
-subterranean world, conforming to the paintings of the burial-places of
-Thebes, notably those of the tomb of Seti I.
-
-As for the sufferings of the Dirces, there was no doubt about them.
-People know the colossal group now in the Museum of Naples, called the
-_Toro Farnese_,--Amphion and Zethus attaching Dirce to the horns of an
-unmanageable bull, which is to drag her over the rocks and briers of
-Cithæron. This mediocre Rhodian marble, brought to Rome in the time of
-Augustus, was the object of universal admiration. How could there be a
-finer subject for the hideous art which the cruelty of the time had made
-in vogue, and which consisted in reproducing the celebrated statues in
-living tableaux? An inscription and a fresco of Pompeii seem to prove
-that this terrible scene was frequently repeated in the arenas, when a
-woman was the sufferer. Naked, attached by the hair to the horns of a
-furious bull, these poor wretches glutted the eyes of a ferocious
-people. Some of the Christians immolated in this way were feeble in
-body: their courage was superhuman. But the infamous crowd had eyes
-alone for their torn bowels and lacerated bosoms.
-
-After the day when Jesus expired in Golgotha, the _fête_ day in the
-Gardens of Nero (it may be fixed about the first of August, 64) was the
-most solemn in the history of Christianity. The solidity of any
-construction is in proportion to the sum of virtue, of sacrifices, and
-of devotion which has been laid down at its base. Only fanatics lay
-foundations. Judaism endures still on account of the intense frenzy of
-its zealots; Christianity, on account of its first witnesses. The orgy
-of Nero was the grand baptism of blood which set Rome apart as the city
-of martyrs in order to play a distinct _rôle_ in the history of
-Christianity and to be the second Holy City. It was the taking
-possession of the Vatican Hill by conquerors hitherto unknown there. The
-odious, hair-brained man who governed the world did not perceive that he
-was the founder of a new order, and that he signed a charter for the
-future, the effects of which would be claimed after eighteen hundred
-years.
-
-
-IV.
-
-As we have said, it is allowable, without improbability, to connect the
-deaths of the apostles Peter and Paul with the account which we have
-just given. The only historical incident known, by which the martyrdom
-of Peter can be explained, is the episode recounted by Tacitus. Some
-solid reasons also lead us to believe that Paul suffered the death of a
-martyr at Rome. It is then natural to suppose that he also died in the
-massacre of July and August, 64. As to the manner of death of the two
-apostles, we know with certainty that Peter was crucified. According to
-some ancient writings, his wife was executed with him, and he saw her
-led to the sacrifice. One accepted account of the third century says,
-that, too humble to equal Jesus, he suffered with his head down. The
-characteristic trait of the butchery of 64 having been the search for
-odious rarities in torture, it is possible that in truth Peter was shown
-to the crowd in this hideous attitude. Seneca mentions some cases in
-which tyrants have been known to turn the heads of the crucified towards
-the earth. Christian piety has seen a mystical refinement in that which
-was indeed an odd caprice of the executioner. Perhaps this extract from
-the Fourth Gospel--"Thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another
-shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not"--includes
-some allusion to a peculiarity in the suffering of Peter. Paul, in his
-quality of _honestior_, had his head cut off. It is also probable that
-he was judged regularly, and that he was not included in the summary
-condemnations of the victims in the _fête_ of Nero. All that, I repeat,
-is doubtful, and of little importance. True or not, the legend is
-believed. At the commencement of the third century, near Rome, there
-were already seen two monuments bearing the names of Peter and Paul. One
-was situated at the foot of the Vatican Hill, that of St. Peter: the
-other, in the way to Ostia, was that of St. Paul. They were called in
-oratorial style the trophies of the apostles. In the fourth century two
-basilicas were raised above these trophies. One of them is the present
-basilica of St. Peter: the other, St. Paul-without-the-Walls, has
-retained its essential features until our own century.
-
-Did the trophies which the Christians venerated about the year 200
-designate the spots upon which these apostles suffered? It is possible.
-It is not unlikely that Paul, toward the end of his life, dwelt in the
-suburb which extended beyond the Lavernal gate as far as the pine of the
-Salvian springs in the way to Ostia. The shade of Peter, on the other
-hand, wanders always, according to the Christian legend, towards the
-turpentine-tree of the Vatican, not far from the gardens of the Circus
-of Nero, and especially about the obelisk. It may be that the ancient
-place of the obelisk in the sacristy of St. Peter, now indicated by an
-inscription, is nearer to the place where St. Peter upon the cross of
-his frightful agony surfeited the eyes of a populace greedy to see him
-suffer. However, that is a secondary question. If the basilica of the
-Vatican does not really cover the tomb of St. Peter, it points out not
-the less for our remembrance one of the spots most truly hallowed by
-Christianity. The place which the seventeenth century surrounded with a
-theatrical colonnade was a second Calvary; and, even supposing that
-Peter was not crucified there, at least we cannot doubt the sufferings
-of the Danaïdes and the Dirces.
-
- * * * * *
-
-We shall show in our next assembly how tradition disposes of all these
-doubts, and how the Church consummates reconciliation between Peter and
-Paul, which death perhaps began. This was the price of success. The
-Judæan-Christianity of Peter and the Hellenism of Paul, apparently
-irreconcilable, were equally necessary to the success of the future
-work. The Judæan-Christianity represented the conservative spirit
-without which nothing is solid; Hellenism, advance and progress, without
-which nothing truly exists. Life is the result of a conflict between two
-contrary forces. The absence of all revolutionary spirit is as fatal as
-the excess of revolution.
-
-
-
-
- THIRD CONFERENCE,
-
- London, April 13, 1880.
-
- ROME,
- THE CENTRE OF THE FORMATION OF ECCLESIASTICAL
- AUTHORITY.
-
-
-
-
-THIRD CONFERENCE.
-
-ROME THE CENTRE OF THE FORMATION OF ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY.
-
-
-I.
-
-Almost always the nations created to play a part in universal
-civilization, like Judæa, Greece, and the Italy of the renaissance,
-exercise their full action upon the world, only after becoming victims
-to their own grandeur. They must first die; then the world lives on
-them, assimilates to itself that which they have created at the price of
-their fever and their sufferings. Nations ought to choose in fact
-between the long, tranquil, obscure destiny of that which lives for
-itself, and the troubled, stormy career of that which lives for
-humanity. The nation which works out social and religious problems in
-its own bosom is almost always weak politically. Every country which
-dreams of a kingdom of God, which lives for general ideas, which pursues
-a work of universal interest, sacrifices through the same its individual
-destiny, enfeebles and destroys its _rôle_ as a terrestrial country.
-One can never set himself on fire with impunity. Since Judæa made the
-religious conquest of the world, it was necessary that she should
-disappear as a nation. A revolution of extreme violence broke out in
-this country in the year 66. During four years, this strange race, which
-seemed created to defy equally that which blessed and that which cursed
-it, was in a convulsion before which the historian should pause with
-respect as he would before all mystery.
-
-The causes of this crisis were very old, and the crisis itself was
-inevitable. The Mosaic law, a work of exalted Utopians possessed of a
-powerful socialist ideal,--the least politic of men,--was, like the
-Islam, exclusive of a civil society parallel with a religious society.
-This law, which appears to have been drawn up, as we now read it, in the
-seventh century before Jesus Christ, would have been the means of
-destroying the little kingdom of the descendants of David, even without
-the Assyrian conquest. Since the preponderance assumed by the prophetic
-element, the kingdom of Judah--embroiled with all its neighbors, seized
-with a permanent rage against Tyre, hating Edom, Moab, and Ammon--could
-no longer survive. I repeat, a nation which devotes itself to social and
-religious problems neglects its politics. The day in which Israel became
-"a peculiar people of God, a kingdom of priests, a holy nation," it was
-written that she should no longer be a nation as other nations.
-Contrary destinies cannot be united: an exaltation is always expiated by
-an abasement.
-
-The Achemenidean kingdom gave Israel little repose. This grand
-feudality, tolerant towards all provincial differences, almost analogous
-to the Califat of Bagdad and to the Ottoman Empire, was the rule under
-which the Jews found themselves most at ease. The Ptolemaic rule in the
-third century before Jesus Christ seemed equally sympathetic to them:
-there were even no Seleucidæ. Antioch had become an active centre of
-Hellenic propagandism. Antiochus Epiphanus felt it necessary to set up
-everywhere the image of Jupiter Olympus as the sign of his power. Then
-broke out the first great Jewish revolt against profane civilization.
-Israel had patiently supported the disappearance of its political
-existence since Nebuchadnezzar. It retained no measure in which it saw a
-danger to its religious institutions. A race, in general not military,
-was seized with an access of heroism; without a regular army, without
-generals, without tactics, it conquered the Seleucidæ, maintained its
-revealed rights, and created a second period of autonomy. The Asmonean
-royalty, nevertheless, was always distracted by profound interior vices.
-It endured but one century. The destiny of the Jewish people was not to
-constitute a separate nationality. That people dreamed always of
-something international. Its ideal was not the city, it was the
-synagogue, the free congregation. The same is true of the Islam, which
-has created an immense empire, but has destroyed all nationality, in the
-sense in which we understand it, among the peoples which it has
-subjugated, and leaves them no other country than the mosque and the
-_Zaouia_.
-
-The name of theocracy is often applied to such a social condition, and
-rightly so, if we mean by it that the profound idea of the Semitic
-religions, and of the empires which came out from them, is the kingdom
-of God considered as the master of the world, and universal suzerain.
-But theocracy with these nations was not synonymous with the domination
-of priests. The priest, properly speaking, plays an unimportant _rôle_
-in the history of Judaism and Islamism. The power belongs to the
-representative of God,--to him whom God inspires, to the prophet, to the
-holy man, to him who has received his mission from Heaven, and who
-proves his mission by a miracle, that is to say, by success. In default
-of a prophet, the power belongs to the author of apocalypses, and of
-apocryphal books attributed to the ancient prophets, or, better, to the
-doctor who interprets the divine law, to the head of the synagogue, and,
-still more, to the head of the family who guards the depository of the
-law, and transmits it to his children. A civil power, a royalty, has
-little to do with such social organization. This organization never
-works better than among spread-out peoples, under the rights of
-tolerated foreigners, in a grand empire where uniformity does not rule.
-It is the nature of Judaism to be politically subordinate, since it
-cannot draw from its own bosom a principle of military power. Its
-_animus_ has been to form communities with their own laws and their own
-magistrates in the midst of other states, until modern liberalism
-introduced the principle of the equality of all before the law.
-
-The Roman rule, established in Judæa sixty-three years before Christ by
-the armies of Pompey, seemed at first to realize some of the conditions
-of Jewish life. Rome at this epoch did not pursue the policy of
-assimilating the countries which she annexed to her vast empire. She
-robbed them of the right of peace and war, and arrogated to herself only
-the arbitration in great political questions.
-
-Under the degenerated remains of the Asmonean dynasty and under the
-Herods, the Jewish nation preserved a half independence, in which its
-religious state was respected. But the interior feeling of the people
-was too strong. Beyond a certain degree of religious fanaticism, man is
-ungovernable. It should be said that Rome strove without ceasing to
-render her power in the East more effective. The little vassal kingdoms
-which she had at first preserved, disappeared day by day, and the
-provinces made returns to the empire pure and simple. The administrative
-customs of the Romans, even in their most reasonable aspects, were
-odious to the Jews. In general, the Romans showed the greatest
-condescension to the fastidious scruples of the nation; but that was not
-sufficient: things had come to a point where nothing could be done
-without touching upon a canonical question. These absolute religions,
-like Islamism and Judaism, allow no participation: if they do not reign,
-they call themselves persecuted. If they feel themselves protected, they
-become exacting, and seek to render life impossible to other worships
-about them.
-
-I should depart from my plan if I recounted to you that strange struggle
-of which Josephus tells us,--the terror in Jerusalem, Simon Bar-Gioras,
-commandant in the city, John of Giscala with his assassins, master of
-the temple. Fanatical movements are far from excluding hate, jealousy,
-and defiance, from those who take part in them. Very decided and
-passionate men associated together ordinarily suspect each other, and in
-this there is a force; for reciprocal suspicion establishes terror among
-them, binds them as with an iron chain, hinders defections and moments
-of weakness. Interest creates the _coterie_. Absolute principles create
-division, and inspire the temptation to decimate, to expel, to kill
-enemies. Those who judge human affairs superficially believe that a
-revolution is quelled when the revolutionists "eat one another," as it
-is expressed. It is, on the contrary, a proof that the revolution has
-all its energy, that an impersonal ardor presides over it. This is
-nowhere more clearly seen than in the terrible drama at Jerusalem. The
-actors seem to have entered into the compact of death like some infernal
-rounds, in which, according to the belief of the middle ages, Satan was
-seen forming a chain to draw into a fantastic gulf numbers of men,
-dancing, and holding each other by the hand. So revolution allows no one
-to escape from the dance which it leads. Terror is behind the lukewarm.
-Turn by turn, exalting some, and exalted by others, they rush into the
-abyss. None can recede; for behind each one is a concealed sword, which,
-at the moment that he wishes to draw back, forces him to advance.
-
-The strangest thing of all is that these madmen were not wholly wrong.
-The fanatics of Jerusalem, who affirmed that Jerusalem was eternal even
-while it was burning, were nearer the truth than those who regarded them
-as mere assassins. They deceived themselves upon the military question,
-but not upon the distant religious result. These troubled days point
-out, in fact, the moment when Jerusalem became the spiritual capital of
-the world. The Apocalypse, a burning expression of the love which she
-inspired, has taken its place among the religious writings of humanity,
-and has there consecrated the image of the beloved city. Ah, how
-important it is never to predict the future of a saint or a villain, a
-fool or a sage! Jerusalem, a city of common people, would have pursued
-indefinitely its uninteresting history. It is because it had the
-incomparable honor of being the cradle of Christianity, that it was the
-victim of the Johns of Giscala, of the Bar-Gioras,--in appearance the
-scourges of their country, in reality the instruments of its apotheosis.
-These zealots, whom Josephus treats as brigands and assassins, were
-politicians of the highest order, but unskilful soldiers: still they
-lost heroically a country which could not be saved. They lost a material
-city: they established the spiritual reign of Jerusalem, sitting in her
-desolation far more glorious than she was in the days of Herod and of
-Solomon. What did these conservatives, these Sadducees, really desire?
-They wished something mean,--the continuation of a city of priests like
-Emesa, Tyane, Comane. Assuredly they did not deceive themselves when
-they declared that the surging enthusiasm was the ruin of the nation.
-Revolution and Messianism destroyed the national existence of the Jewish
-people; but revolution and Messianism were the true vocation of this
-people,--that by which they contributed to the universal civilization.
-
-
-II.
-
-The victory of Rome was complete. A captain of our race, of our blood, a
-man like us, at the head of legions in whose roll, if we could read it,
-we should meet many of our ancestors, had come to crush the fortress of
-Semitism, to inflict upon the revealed, accepted law the greatest injury
-which it had received. It was the triumph of Roman right, or rather
-rational right, a creation utterly philosophical, presupposing no
-revelation, above the Jewish Thora, the fruit of a revelation. This
-right, whose roots were partly Greek, but in which the practical genius
-of the Latins made so fine a part, was the excellent gift which Rome
-brought to the vanquished in return for their independence. Each victory
-for Rome was a victory for right. Rome bore into the world a better
-principle in several respects than that of the Jews: I mean the profane
-state, reposing on a purely civil conception of society.
-
-The triumph of Titus was then legitimate in many ways, and still there
-never was a more useless triumph. The deplorable religious nothingness
-of Rome rendered its victory unfruitful. This victory did not retard the
-progress of Judaism a single day: it did not give the religion of the
-empire an added chance to struggle against this redoubtable rival. The
-national existence of the Jewish people was lost forever; but that was a
-blessing. The true glory of Judaism was Christianity, about to be born.
-The ruin of Jerusalem and the temple was an unequalled good for
-Christianity.
-
-If the reasoning of Titus according to Tacitus is correctly reported,
-the victorious general believed that the destruction of the temple would
-be the ruin of Christianity as well as that of Judaism. No one was ever
-more completely deceived. The Romans imagined, that, in tearing up the
-root, they should eradicate the shoot at the same time; but the shoot
-was already a shrub that lived its own life. If the temple had survived,
-Christianity would certainly have been arrested in its development. The
-surviving temple would have continued to be the centre of all Judaic
-works. It would always have been regarded as the most holy place of the
-world: pilgrims would have come there, and would there have brought
-their tributes. The Church of Jerusalem, grouped around by consecrated
-parvises, would have continued, by the strength of its primacy, to
-receive the homage of all the world, to persecute the Christians of the
-Church of Paul, to exact, that, in order to have the right to call one's
-self the disciple of Jesus, one should practise the circumcision, and
-observe the Mosaic code. All effectual propagandism would have been
-interdicted: letters of obedience signed at Jerusalem would have been
-exacted from the missionary. A centre of irrefragable authority, a
-patriarchate composed of a sort of college of cardinals under the
-presidency of men like James, pure Jews belonging to the family of
-Jesus, would have been established, and would have constituted an
-immense danger for the new-born Church. When one sees St. Paul after so
-many mishaps remaining always attached to the Church of Jerusalem, one
-understands what difficulties a rupture with these holy personages would
-have presented. Such a schism would have been considered as an enormity.
-The separation from Judaism would have been impossible; and this
-separation was the indispensable condition of the existence of the new
-religion. The mother was about to kill the child. The temple, on the
-contrary, once destroyed, the Christians thought no more of it: very
-soon, indeed, they will consider it a profane place: Jesus will be every
-thing to them. The Christian Church of Jerusalem was by the same stroke
-reduced to a secondary importance. It was re-organized around the
-element which made its force, the _desposyni_, the members of the family
-of Jesus, the sons of Clopas; but it will reign no more. This centre of
-hate and exclusion once destroyed, the reconciliation of the opposing
-parties in the Church of Jesus will become easy. Peter and Paul will be
-brought into accord, and the terrible duality of the new-born
-Christianity will cease to be a mortal sore. Lost in the depth of the
-interior of the Batanæa and the Hauran, the little group which attached
-itself to James and Clopas becomes the Ebionite sect, and slowly dies.
-
-These relatives of Jesus were pious, tranquil, mild, modest,
-hard-working men, faithful to the severest precepts of Jesus concerning
-poverty, but at the same time very exact Jews, considering the title of
-"Child of Israel" before every other advantage. From the year 70 to
-about the year 110, they really governed the churches beyond the Jordan,
-and formed a sort of Christian senate. There is no need to demonstrate
-the immense danger which these pre-occupations, with genealogies, were
-to the new-born Christianity. A sort of nobility of Christianity was
-about to be formed. In the political order the nobility is almost a
-necessity to the state. Politics having elements of gross struggles
-which render it more material than ideal, a state is very strong only
-when a certain number of families has, by tradition and privilege, the
-duty and interest of guarding its welfare, representing and defending
-it. But, in the order of the ideal government, birth is nothing: each
-one is valued in proportion to the truth he shows, and the good he does.
-The institutions which have a religious, literary, moral end, are lost,
-when considerations of family, caste, heredity, prevail in them. The
-nephews and cousins of Jesus would have ruined Christianity, if the
-churches of Paul had not already been strong enough to act as a
-counterpoise to this aristocracy, the tendency of which would have been
-to proclaim itself alone respectable, and to treat all converts as
-intruders. Some pretensions analogous to those of the Alides in Islam
-were established. Islamism would certainly have perished under the
-embarrassment caused by the family of the prophet, if the result of the
-struggles of the first century of the Hegira had not been to reject,
-upon second thought, all those who were too near the person of the
-prophet. The true heirs of a great man are those who continue his work,
-and not his relatives by blood. Considering the tradition of Jesus as
-his own possession, the little _coterie_ of the Nazarenes, as they are
-called, would certainly have stifled it. Happily this narrow circle
-disappeared in good season: the relatives of Jesus were soon forgotten
-in the interior of the Hauran. They lost all importance, and left Jesus
-to his true family, the only one which he has recognized,--those of whom
-he said, "They hear the word of God, and keep it."
-
-
-III.
-
-According as the Church of Jerusalem sank, the Church of Rome rose, or,
-rather, a phenomenon was evidently manifested in the years which
-followed the victory of Titus. It was that the Church of Rome became
-more and more the inheritor and the substitute of the Church of
-Jerusalem. The spirit of the two churches was the same: what was a
-danger at Jerusalem became an advantage at Rome. The taste for tradition
-and the hierarchy, and the respect for authority, were in some sort
-transplanted from the parvises of the temple to the Occident. James, the
-brother of the Lord, had been a sort of pope at Jerusalem. Rome is about
-to take up the part of James. We shall have the pope at Rome. Without
-Titus, we should have had the pope in Jerusalem, but with this great
-difference, that the pope at Jerusalem would have extinguished
-Christianity in about one or two hundred years, while the Pope of Rome
-has made it the religion of the universe.
-
-Here appears a very important person, who seems to have been the head of
-the Roman Church in the early years of the first century, concerning
-whom I am happy to find myself in accord with one of your most scholarly
-and enlightened critics, Mr. Lightfoot. I speak of Clement Romanus. In
-the penumbra in which he remains, enveloped and almost lost in the
-luminous dust of a beautiful far-off history, Clement is one of the
-grand figures of early Christianity: one would say that it was the head
-of an old effaced fresco of Giotto's, recognizable still from his golden
-aureola, and some dim features of striking purity and sweetness. One
-thing is beyond doubt: it is the high rank which he held in the utterly
-spiritual hierarchy of the church of his time, and the unequalled credit
-with which he sustained it. His approval made the law. All parties clung
-to him, and wished to shield themselves under his authority. It is
-probable that he was one of the most energetic agents of the grand work
-that was about to be accomplished: I mean the posthumous reconciliation
-of Peter and Paul, without which union the work of Christ could only
-have perished. His high personality, aggrandized by tradition, was,
-after that of Peter, the most holy figure of the primitive Christian
-Rome.
-
-Already the idea of a certain primacy in the Church of Rome began to
-show itself. The right of advising the other churches and of settling
-their differences was accorded to this church. It is believed that like
-privileges had been allowed to Peter among the disciples. Now a still
-closer bond was established between Peter and Rome. In the time of
-Clement, great dissensions divided the Church at Corinth. The Roman
-Church, being applied to in these troubles, replied by an epistle,
-which has been preserved to us. The epistle is anonymous; but a very
-ancient tradition teaches that Clement was the author of it. The Church
-at Corinth had changed but little since St. Paul. It had the same proud,
-disputant, feeble spirit. It is evident that the principal opposition to
-the hierarchy was found in this Greek spirit, always mobile, because it
-was always full of life, undisciplined (and for my part I like it), not
-knowing how to form a flock from a crowd. The women and the children
-were in full revolt. Some superior doctors imagined that they possessed
-a profound sense in every thing, and mystic secrets analogous to the
-gift of tongues and the discernment of spirits. Those who were honored
-with these supernatural gifts scorned the ancients, and aspired to
-replace them. Corinth had a respectable presbytery, which, however, did
-not receive the highest mysticism. The advanced pretenders cast it in
-the shade, and put themselves in its place. Some of the _presbyteri_
-were even dismissed. The struggle between the established hierarchy and
-personal revelations began, and this struggle fills the history of the
-Church; the privileged soul complaining, that, in spite of the favors
-with which it is honored, a gross clergy, wanting in spiritual life,
-dominates it officially. We see that this was the heresy of individual
-mysticism, maintaining the rights of the spirit against authority,
-pretending to rise above common mortals and the ordinary clergy by right
-of its direct intercourse with divinity.
-
-The Roman Church was always the church of order, of subordination, and
-of rule. Its fundamental principle was that humility and submission were
-of more value than the most sublime gifts. Its epistle is the first
-manifestation in the Christian Church of the principle of authority.
-
-A few years since, there was much surprise when a French archbishop,
-then a senator, said in the Tribune, "My clergy is my regiment." Clement
-had said this before him. Order and obedience were the supreme laws of
-the family and the church. "Let us consider the soldiers who serve under
-our sovereigns. With what order, what punctuality, what submission, they
-obey their commands: all are not prefects, nor tribunes, nor centurions;
-but each one in his rank executes the orders of the emperor and of his
-chiefs. The great cannot exist without the small, nor the small without
-the great. In every thing there is a mingling of diverse elements, and
-by this mingling all advances. Let us take, for example, our bodies. The
-head is nothing without the feet; the feet are nothing without the head.
-The smallest of our organs are necessary, and serve the whole body: all
-conspire, and obey the same principle of subordination for the
-preservation of the whole."
-
-The history of the ecclesiastical hierarchy is the history of a triple
-abdication; the community of the faithful first placing all its powers
-in the hands of the ancients, or _presbyteri_; the presbyteral body at
-length delegating its authority to one person who was the _episcopos_;
-then the _episcopi_ of the Latin Church recognized as their head one of
-themselves, who became the pope. This last progress, if we may call it
-so, was not accomplished until our time. The creation of the episcopate,
-on the contrary, was the work of the second century. The absorption of
-the church by the _presbyteri_ was accomplished before the year 100. In
-the Epistle of Clement Romanus it is not yet with the episcopate, but
-with the presbytery, that he deals. We find there no trace of a
-_presbyteros_ superior to the others, and entitled to dethrone them; but
-the author proclaims positively that the presbytery and the clergy are
-above the people. The apostles, in establishing churches, chose through
-the inspiration of the Spirit the "bishops and the deacons of the future
-believers." The power emanating from the apostles has been transmitted
-by regular succession. No church has then the right to dethrone its
-seniors. The privilege of the rich is nothing in the church.
-Accordingly, those who are favored with mystic gifts, instead of
-believing themselves above the hierarchy, should be the more submissive.
-This involves the great problem, "Who exists in the church? Is it the
-people? Is it the clergy? Is it inspiration?" This problem was already
-given in the time of St. Paul, who resolved it in the true manner by
-mutual charity. One epistle trenches upon the question in the sense of
-pure Catholicism. The apostolic title is every thing: the right of the
-people is reduced to nothing. We may then safely assert that Catholicism
-had its origin at Rome, since the Church of Rome laid down its first
-rules. Prescience pertains to spiritual gifts, to science and
-distinction: it belongs to the hierarchy, to the powers transmitted
-through the medium of the canonical ordination, which attaches itself to
-the apostles by an unbroken chain. The free church as Christ conceived
-it, and as St. Paul also regarded it, was a Utopia which held nothing
-for the future. Evangelical liberty had destroyed it; and it was not
-realized, that, with the hierarchy uniformity and death would come in
-time.
-
-
-IV.
-
-Clement had probably not seen either Peter or Paul. His great practical
-sense showed him that the salvation of the Christian Church demanded the
-reconciliation of the two founders. Did he influence the author of the
-Acts which represent to us this reconciliation as accomplished, and with
-whom he seems to have had some intercourse, or did these two pious souls
-spontaneously fall into accord on account of the bias which he had given
-to Christian opinion? We are ignorant for want of proofs. One thing is
-sure, the reconciliation of Peter and Paul was a Roman work. Rome had
-two churches,--one coming from Peter, the other from Paul. Those
-numerous converts who came to Jesus--some through the school of Peter,
-and some through that of Paul--were tempted to exclaim, "What! Are
-there, then, two Christs?" It was necessary to be able to reply, "No:
-Peter and Paul understand each other perfectly: the Christianity of one
-is the Christianity of the other." Perhaps (this is an ingenious
-hypothesis of M. Strauss) a light cloud was introduced for this purpose
-into the evangelical legend of the miraculous fishing. According to the
-recital of Luke, the nets of Peter would not contain the multitudes of
-fish which could easily have been taken; Peter was obliged to make a
-sign to his co-workers to come to his aid. A second bark (Paul and his
-friends) was filled as the first, and the fishing of the kingdom of God
-was superabundant.
-
-The life of the apostles begins to become obscure. All those who have
-seen them have disappeared: most of them left no writings. One had
-entire liberty to embroider on this virgin canvas still. Friends and
-enemies profited by the unknown to set up arguments in support of their
-theses, and to satisfy their hates. Towards the year 130, that is to say
-about sixty-six years after the death of the apostles, a vast Ebionite
-legend was produced at Rome, and designated by the title of the
-preaching, or the travels, of Peter. The missions of the chief of the
-apostles were recounted there, principally those along the coast of
-Ph[oe]nicia; the conversions which he had made; above all, his struggles
-against the great anti-Christ, Simon the Magician, who was at this epoch
-the spectre of the Christian conscience. But frequently under this
-abhorred name another person was concealed: it was the false apostle
-Paul, the enemy of the law, the veritable destroyer of the Church. The
-true Church was that at Jerusalem, presided over by James, the brother
-of the Lord. No apostolate was of any value, if it could not show
-letters emanating from this central college. Paul had none: therefore he
-was an intruder. He was the "man enemy," who came behind to sow the
-tares in the steps of the true sower. With what fury Peter gave the
-denial to his impostures, to his false allegations of personal
-revelations, his ascension to the third heaven, his, pretension of
-knowing about Jesus some things which the hearers of the gospel had not
-understood, the exaggerated manner in which he and his disciples
-interpreted the divinity of Jesus!
-
-These strange ideas of half ignorant sectaries would have been without
-consequences outside of Rome; but every thing which related to Peter
-assumed importance in the capital of the world. In spite of its
-heresies, "The Preachings of Peter" had much interest for the orthodox.
-The primacy of Peter was there proclaimed. St. Paul was thus injured;
-but a few retouches extenuated what was shocking in these attacks.
-Several attempts were made to diminish the peculiarities of the new
-book, and adapt it to the Catholics. This mode of re-modelling books to
-suit the sect to which one belonged was the order of the day. Little by
-little the force of things was understood: all sensible men saw that
-there was safety for the work of Jesus only in the perfect
-reconciliation of the two heads of the Christian doctrine. Paul had,
-even in the sixth century, some bitter enemies: he had always some
-enthusiastic followers like Marcion. Outside of these obstinate men of
-the right and left, there was a union of the moderate masses, who,
-before their Christianism in one of the schools, fully recognized the
-right of the other to be called Christian. James, the partisan of
-absolute Judaism, was sacrificed, although he had been the true chief of
-the circumcision. Peter, who was much less objectionable to the
-disciples of Paul, was preferred before him. James retained no devoted
-partisans outside of the Judæan-Christians.
-
-It is difficult to say who gained the most in this reconciliation. The
-concessions came principally from the side of Paul: all Paul's disciples
-received the others without difficulty, while those of Peter repulsed
-the followers of Paul. But concessions usually come from the strong. In
-truth, each day confirmed Paul's victory.
-
-Each Gentile convert weighted the balance on his side. Outside of Syria,
-the Judæan-Christians were swallowed up by the wave of new converts. The
-churches of Paul prospered: they had good judgment, solidity of mind,
-and some pecuniary resources which the others had not. The Ebionite
-churches, on the contrary, grew poorer each day. The money of the
-churches of Paul was spent in the support of some glorious poor men, who
-were unable to earn any thing, but who possessed the traditional life of
-the primitive spirit. The elevated piety and severe manners of these
-last were admired by the Christian communities of Pagan origin, who
-imitated and assimilated themselves to these customs. It soon happened
-that no distinction was manifest: the sweet and conciliatory spirit of
-St. Luke and Clement Romanus prevailed. The compact of peace was sealed.
-It was agreed that Peter had converted the first-fruits of the
-Gentiles, that he had first absolved them from the yoke of the law. It
-was admitted that Peter and Paul had been the two heads, the founders of
-the Church of Rome; Peter and Paul became the halves of an inseparable
-couple,--two luminaries, like the sun and moon. What one taught, the
-other taught also. They had always been in accord: they had opposed the
-same enemies, had been victims of Simon the Magician. At Rome they lived
-like brothers; the Church of Rome was their common work. The supremacy
-of this church was established for ages.
-
-Thus, from the reconciliation of these parties, the settlement of these
-primitive struggles, there came forth a grand unity,--the Catholic
-Church, the Church of Peter and of Paul, a stranger to the rivalries
-which had marked the first century.
-
-It was, above all, the death of the two apostles which pre-occupied the
-parties, and gave an opportunity for the most diverse combinations. The
-tissue of tradition grew in this respect, by an instinctive travail,
-almost as imperious as that which had presided at the construction of
-the legend of Jesus. The end of the life of Peter and of Paul was
-commanded _à priori_. It was maintained that Christ had predicted the
-martyrdom of Peter, as he had announced the death of the sons of
-Zebedee. The need was felt of associating in death the two persons who
-had been reconciled by force. It was hoped, and perhaps this was not far
-from right, that they died together, or at least as the consequence of
-the same event. The places which were believed to have been sanctified
-by this bloody drama were early fixed upon, and consecrated by
-_memoriæ_. In each case, whatever the people desired came in the end to
-be true. Tradition makes history, retrospectively, as it ought to have
-been, and as it never is. Not long ago the portraits of Victor Emmanuel
-and Pius IX. hung side by side in every frequented place in Italy; and
-the people desired that these two men, who represented principles whose
-reconciliation was generally considered necessary to Italy, should be in
-reality completely united. If, in our time, such views impose themselves
-on history, it will one day appear, in documents reputed to be serious,
-that Victor Emmanuel and Pius IX. (probably Garibaldi will be added) met
-each other secretly, understood and loved each other. During the middle
-ages, at different times, similar attempts were made to appease the
-hatreds of the Dominicans and Franciscans; to prove that the founders of
-these two orders were two brothers living together in the most
-affectionate intercourse; that at first their rules were the same; and
-that St. Dominic girded himself with the cord of St. Francis.
-
-Concerning Peter and Paul, the increase of the legend was rich and
-rapid. Rome and all its environs, above all the way to Ostia, were full
-of souvenirs which were pretended to be connected with the last days of
-the two apostles. A crowd of touching circumstances; the flight of
-Peter; the vision of Jesus bearing his cross, _iterum crucifigi_; the
-final adieu of Peter and Paul; the meeting of Peter with his wife; Paul
-at the Salvian waters; Plautilla sending the handkerchief which bound
-her hair to bandage the eyes of Paul,--all this presented a beautiful
-ensemble, to which was only wanting an ingenuous and skilful writer. It
-was too late; the vein of the first Christian literature was spent; the
-serenity of the narrator of the Acts was lost; his voice was raised no
-more in story or in romance. It is impossible to choose between a crowd
-of equally apocryphal writings: in vain one seeks to shield these
-recitals with the most venerable names (pseudo-Linus, pseudo-Marcellus);
-the Roman legend of Peter and Paul remains always in a sporadic state.
-It was more often recounted by the pious guides than seriously read. It
-was a local affair: no text concerning it has been consecrated and made
-authoritative for reading in the churches.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Many among you, ladies and gentlemen, will go to Rome, or will return
-there. Ah, well! if you preserve any good remembrance of these
-conferences, go, in memory of me, to the Salvian waters, _alle tre
-fontane_, to St. Paul-without-the-Walls. It is one of the most beautiful
-parts of the Roman Campagna,--deserted, damp, green, and sad. There, in
-a deep depression in the soil, crowned by those grand horizontal lines,
-disturbed by no living detail,--there are some clear and cold springs.
-The fever and mouldiness of the tomb are inhaled there. Some Trappists
-are there established, conscientiously practising their religious
-suicide. When you are there, sit down a moment, not too long (one
-quickly catches the fever there), and, while the Trappists give you to
-drink the water which gushes from the three bounds which the head of
-Paul made, think of him who came here to talk of these legends with you,
-and to whom you have listened with so much courtesy and kind attention.
-
-
-
-
- FOURTH CONFERENCE,
-
- London, April 14, 1880.
-
- ROME,
- THE CAPITAL OF CATHOLICISM.
-
-
-
-
-FOURTH CONFERENCE.
-
-ROME, THE CAPITAL OF CATHOLICISM.
-
-
-Ladies and Gentlemen,--It is plain that the importance of the churches
-in the primitive Christian community was in proportion to their
-apostolic nobility. The guaranty of orthodoxy was in the succession of
-the bishops, by which the great churches were linked to the apostles. A
-direct line appeared to afford a very strong assurance of conformity of
-doctrine, and it was jealously maintained. Now, what can be said of a
-church founded by both Peter and Paul? It is clear that such a church
-ought to endure in order to have a veritable superiority over others.
-The _chef-d'[oe]uvre_ of the competency of the Roman Church was the
-establishment of this superiority. That once assured, the ecclesiastical
-destiny of Rome was established. When this city should have cast off her
-secular character, she would have another,--a sacred capacity,
-corresponding to that of Jerusalem.
-
-She would know how to confiscate to her profit this Christianity which
-she had so cruelly combated,--so much had humanity suffered, to escape
-from those whom fate had designed for this great secular task, _regere
-imperio populos!_
-
-Under Antonine and Marcus Aurelius, Rome reached its highest grandeur;
-its rule of the whole world seemed to be undisputed; no cloud could be
-seen upon its horizon. The emigration from the provinces, above all from
-the Orient, was augmented rather than lessened. The Greek-speaking
-population was larger than it had ever been. All who desired a place in
-the world aspired to come to Rome: nothing was sanctioned until it had
-received the stamp of this universal exposition of the products of the
-entire universe.
-
-The centre of a future catholic orthodoxy was evidently there. The
-well-developed germ of the Papacy existed under Antonine. The Church of
-Rome showed itself more and more indifferent to those crude Gnostic
-speculations which occupied some minds filled with the intellectual
-activity of the Greeks, but tainted with the reveries of the Orient. The
-organization of Christian society was the principal labor at Rome. This
-extraordinary city applied to this object the energetic moral strength
-and the practical genius which she has employed in the most diverse
-causes. Careless of speculation, decidedly hostile to dogmatic
-innovations, she presided there,--a mistress already trained by all the
-changes which had been brought about in discipline and in the
-hierarchy.
-
-
-I.
-
-From the year 120 to 130 the Episcopate was elaborated in the Christian
-Church, and the creation of the Episcopate was eminently a Roman work.
-All _ecclesiæ_ imply a little hierarchy,--a bureau as it is called
-to-day,--a president, some assessors, and a small staff of men in its
-service. Democratic associations are careful that these functions shall
-be limited as far as possible as to power and duration; but from this
-arises that precarious something which has prevented any democratic
-association from outlasting the circumstances which have created it. The
-Jewish synagogues have had more continuity, although the synagogical
-body has never come to be a clergy. This is the result of the
-subordinate place which Judaism has held during several centuries: the
-pressure from without has counteracted the effects of internal
-divisions. If the Christian Church had been left with the same absence
-of directorship, it would doubtless have missed its destiny.
-
-If its ecclesiastical powers had continued to be regarded as emanating
-from the Church itself, it would have lost all its hieratic and
-theocratic character. It was written, on the contrary, that a clergy
-should monopolize the Christian Church, and substitute themselves for
-it. Acting as its spokesman, presenting itself as having the sole power
-of attorney in every thing, this clergy will be its strength, and at the
-same time its gnawing worm,--the principal cause of its future falls.
-
-I repeat, that history has no example of a more complete transformation
-than that which occurred in the government of the Christian Church about
-the time of Hadrian and Antonine. What happened in the Christian Church
-will happen in any association in which the subordinates could resign in
-favor of the bureau, and that again in favor of the president; so that
-afterwards the subordinates and the seniors would have no deliberative
-voice nor influence, nor any control in the management of the funds, and
-the president would be able to say, "I alone, I, am the association."
-The _presbyteri_ (seniors) or _episcopi_ (superintending officers)
-became very soon the only representatives of the Church; and almost
-immediately another still more important revolution took place. Among
-the _presbyteri_ or _episcopi_, there had been one, who, through the
-habit of occupying the principal seat, absorbed the power of the others,
-and became pre-eminently the _episcopos_ or the _presbyteros_. The form
-of worship contributed powerfully to the establishment of this unity.
-The eucharistic act could only be celebrated by one person, and gave to
-the celebrant an extreme importance. That _episcopos_, with a surprising
-rapidity, became the head of the presbytery, and, consequently, the
-entire Church. His _cathedra_ was placed apart, and, having the form of
-an arm-chair, became the seat of honor, the symbol of primacy. From this
-time, each church has but one chief _presbyteros_, who is thus called to
-the exclusion of the other _episcopi_. Beside this bishop, there were
-deacons, widows, and a council of _presbyteri_: but the great step has
-been taken; the bishop is the sole successor of the prophets, his
-associates have disappeared. Apostolic authority, reputed as transmitted
-by the laying-on of hands, suppressed the authority of the community.
-The bishops of the various churches soon placed themselves in
-communication with the others, and formed of the Universal Church a sort
-of oligarchy, which held assemblies, censured its members, decided
-questions of faith, and was in itself a true sovereign power. On one
-side, the shepherds; on the other, the flock. Primitive equality no
-longer existed: in fact, it had endured but a single day. The Church,
-however, was only an instrument in the hands of those who guided her;
-and these held their power, not from the community, but from the
-spiritual inheritance of a transmission claiming to date back to the
-apostles in a continuous line. It is evident that the representative
-system will never be in any degree whatever the law of the Christian
-Church.
-
-It was the Episcopate, without the intervention of civil power, with no
-support from the tribunals, which thus established order above liberty
-in a society originally founded upon individual inspiration. This is why
-the Ebionites, who had no Episcopate, had also no idea of Catholicity.
-At first sight, the work of Jesus was not made to last. Founded upon a
-belief in the destruction of the world, which, as years rolled on, was
-proved an error, it seemed that his congregation could only dissolve in
-anarchy. The prophetic book, the _charismes_, the speaking of tongues,
-individual inspiration, were no more than were necessary to bring all
-again into the proportions of a common chapel. Individual inspiration
-created, but immediately destroyed what it created. After liberty, law
-is necessary. The work of Jesus might be considered as saved the day in
-which it was admitted that the Church has a direct power, a power
-representing that of Jesus. Since then the Church dominates the
-individual, drawing him to her bosom through his need. Inspiration
-passes from the individual to the community. The clergy is the dispenser
-of all pardons, the intermediary between God and the faithful.
-Obedience, first to the Church, then to the bishop, becomes the highest
-duty. Innovation is the sign of error: schism, henceforth, will be for
-the Christian the worst of crimes.
-
-In a certain regard one may say that this was a decadence, a diminution
-of that spontaneity which had been eminently creative until now. It was
-evident that ecclesiastical forms were about to absorb, to stifle, the
-work of Jesus, that all free manifestations of Christian life would soon
-be arrested. Under the censure of the Episcopate, the speaking of
-tongues, prophecy, the creation of legends, the making of new sacred
-books, would soon become withered powers, the _charismes_ would be
-reduced to official sacraments. In another sense, however, such a
-transformation was the essential condition of the strength of humanity.
-And, moreover, the centralization of powers became necessary when
-churches were more numerous: intercourse between these little pious
-societies would be impossible, unless they had representatives appointed
-to act for them. It is undeniable, moreover, that, without the
-Episcopate, the churches, re-united for a time by the souvenirs of
-Jesus, would gradually have been dispersed. The divergences of opinion,
-the difference in the turn of imagination, and, above all, the
-rivalries, and the unsatisfied _amours-propres_, would have operated by
-their infinite effects of disunion and disintegration. Christianity
-would have expired at the end of three or four centuries, like
-Mithraicism and so many other sects which were not allowed to endure.
-Democracy is sometimes eminently creative; but it is upon the condition
-that the democracy comes forth from conservative institutions which
-prevent the revolutionary fever from prolonging itself indefinitely.
-
-Here was the greatest miracle of the new Christianity. It drew order,
-hierarchy, authority, and obedience from the free subjection of desires:
-it organized the crowd; it disciplined anarchy. What does this miracle
-accomplish other than to strike at the pretended derogations to the laws
-of physical nature? The spirit of Jesus strongly inoculated in his
-disciples that spirit of sweetness, of abnegation, of forgetfulness of
-the present; that unique pursuit of interior joys which kills ambition;
-that strong preference given to childhood; those words repeated without
-ceasing, as from Jesus, "Whoever is first among you, let him be the
-servant of all." The influence of the apostles was not less in that
-direction. The apostles lived and ruled after their death. The idea that
-the head of the Church held his command under the members of the Church
-who had elected him never once occurs in the literature of this time.
-The Church thus escaped through the supernatural origin of its power,
-that element of decay which exists in delegated authority. A legislative
-and executive authority may come from the people; but sacraments and
-dispensations of celestial pardons have nothing in common with universal
-suffrage. Such privileges come from heaven, or, according to the
-Christian formula, from Jesus Christ, the source of all pardon and of
-all good.
-
-The religion of Jesus thus became something solid and consistent. The
-great danger of Gnosticism, which was to divide Christianity into
-numberless sects, was exorcised. The word "Catholic Church" resounded
-everywhere, as the name of that great body which would thenceforth
-survive the ages unbroken. The character of this catholicity is already
-seen. The Montanists are regarded as sectarian; the Marcionites are
-convinced of the falseness of the apostolic doctrine; the different
-Gnostic schools are more and more driven from the bosom of the general
-church. Something had arisen which was neither Montanism, nor
-Marcionism, nor Gnosticism; which was Christianity, not sectarian,--the
-Christianity of the majority of bishops, resisting sects, and using them
-all, having, if you will, only negative characters, but preserved by
-these negative characters from the pietist aberrations, and from
-dissolving rationalism. Christianity, like all parties who wish to live,
-disciplines itself, and restrains its own excesses. It unites to
-mystical exaltation a fund of good sense and moderation which will kill
-Millenarism, Charisms, Glossolaly, and all the primitive phenomenal
-spirits. A handful of excited men, like the Montanists, running into
-martyrdom, discouraging penitence, condemning marriage, are not the
-Church. The _juste milieu_ triumphs. Radicals of any sort will never be
-allowed to destroy the work of Jesus. The Church is always of a medium
-opinion: it belongs to all the world, and is not the privilege of an
-aristocracy. The pietist aristocracy of the Phrygian sects and the
-speculative aristocracy of the Gnostics are equally stripped of their
-pretensions.
-
-In the midst of the enormous variety of opinions which fill the first
-Christian age, the Catholic opinion constitutes a sort of standard. It
-was not necessary to reason with the heretic in order to convince him.
-It was sufficient to show him that he was not in communion with the
-Catholic Church, with the grand churches which trace the succession of
-their bishops to the apostles. _Quod semper, quod ubique_ became the
-absolute rule of truth. The argument of prescription to which Tertullian
-gave such eloquent force reviews all the Catholic controversy. To prove
-to any one that he was an innovator, a disturber, was to prove that he
-was wrong,--an insufficient rule, since, by a singular irony of fate,
-the doctor himself who developed this method of refutation in so
-imperious a manner, Tertullian, died a heretic.
-
-Correspondence between the churches was an early custom. Circular
-letters from the heads of the great churches, read on Sunday in the
-re-unions of the faithful, were a sort of continuation of the apostolic
-literature. The ecclesiastical province, questioning the precedency of
-the great churches, appeared in germ. The Church, like the synagogue and
-the mosque, is essentially a citadel. Christianity, like Judaism and
-Islamism, is a religion of cities. The countryman, the _paganus_, will
-be the last resistance which Christianity will encounter. The few rural
-Christians came to the church of the neighboring city. The Roman
-municipality thus enclosed the church. Among the cities, the _civitas_,
-the grand city, was alone a veritable church, with an _episcopos_. The
-small city was in ecclesiastical dependence on the great city. This
-primacy of the great cities was an important fact. The great city once
-converted, the small city and the country followed the movement. The
-diocese was thus the unity of the conglomerate Christians. As for the
-ecclesiastical province, it corresponded to the Roman province: the
-divisions of worship of Rome and Augustus were the secret law which
-ruled all. Those cities which had a flamen, or _archiereus_, are those
-which later had an archbishop: the _flamen civitatis_ became the bishop.
-After the third century, the flamen held the rank in the city which was
-later that of the bishop in the diocese. Thus it happened that the
-ecclesiastical geography of a country was very nearly the geography of
-the same country in the Roman epoch. The picture of the bishops and the
-archbishops is that of the ancient _civitates_, according to their line
-of subordination. The empire was as the mould in which the new religion
-was formed. The interior framework, the outlines, the hierarchical
-divisions, were those of the empire. The ancient archives of the Roman
-administration, and the church-registers of the middle ages, and even
-those of our own day, are nearly the same thing.
-
-Thus the grand organisms which have become so essential a part of the
-moral and political life of European nations were all created by those
-_naïve_ and sincere Christians, whose faith has become inseparable from
-the moral culture of humanity. The Episcopate under Marcus Aurelius was
-fully ripe: the Papacy existed in germ. [OE]cumenical councils were
-impossible. The Christian Empire alone could authorize great assemblies;
-but the provincial synod was used in the affairs of the Montanists and
-of the Passover. The bishop of the capital of the province was allowed
-to preside without contest.
-
-
-II.
-
-Rome was the place in which the grand idea of Catholicity was conceived.
-Rome became each day more and more the capital of Christianity, and
-replaced Jerusalem as the religious centre of humanity. Its church had a
-generally recognized precedence over others. All doubtful questions
-which disturbed the Christian conscience demanded an arbitration, if not
-a solution, at Rome. This very defective reasoning was used,--that,
-since Christ had made Cephas the corner-stone of his church, this
-privilege ought to extend to his successors. By an unequalled stroke,
-the Church of Rome had succeeded in making itself at the same time the
-Church of Peter and the Church of Paul, a new mythical duality,
-replacing that of Romulus and Remus. The Bishop of Rome became the
-bishop of bishops, the one who admonished others. Rome proclaims its
-right (a dangerous right) to excommunicate those who do not entirely
-agree with her. The poor Artemonites (a sort of anticipated Arians) had
-much to complain of in the injustice of the fate which made them
-heretics; while, even until Victor, all the Church of Rome thought with
-them; but they were not heard. From this point, the Church of Rome
-placed itself above history. The spirit which in 1870 could proclaim the
-infallibility of the Pope might see itself reflected at the end of the
-second century by certain clear indications. The writing made at Rome
-about 180, of which the Roman fragment known as the "_Canon de
-Muratori_" makes a part, shows us Rome already regulating the canon of
-the churches, making the passion of Peter the basis of Catholicity, and
-repulsing equally Montanism and Gnosticism. Irenæus refutes all
-heresies by the faith of this church, "the grandest, the most ancient,
-the most illustrious, which possesses by continuous succession the true
-tradition of the apostles Peter and Paul; to which, on account of its
-primacy, all the rest of the Church should have recourse."
-
-One material cause contributed much to that pre-eminence which most of
-the churches recognized in the Church of Rome. This Church was extremely
-rich: its goods, skilfully administered, served to succor and propagate
-other churches. The heretics condemned to the mines received a subsidy
-from it: the common treasury was in a certain sense at Rome. The Sunday
-collection, practised continually in the Roman Church, was probably
-already established. A marvellous spirit of tradition animated this
-little community, in which Judæa, Greece, and Latium seemed to have
-confounded their very different gifts, in view of a prodigious future.
-While the Jewish Monotheism furnished the immovable base of the new
-formation, while Greece continued through Gnosticism its work of free
-speculation, Rome attached itself with an astonishing readiness to the
-work of the government. All its authorities and artifices served well
-for that. Politics recoils not before fraud. Now, politics had already
-taken up its home in the most secret councils of the Church of Rome.
-Some veins of apocryphal literature, constantly refilled, sometimes
-under the name of the apostles, sometimes under that of apostolic
-personages, such as Clement and Hermas, were received with confidence to
-the limits of the Christian world on account of the guaranty of Rome.
-
-This precedence of the Church of Rome continued to increase up to the
-third century. The bishops of Rome showed a rare competency, evading
-theological questions, but always in the first rank in matters of
-organization and administration. The tradition of the Roman Church
-passes for the most ancient of all. Pope Cornelius took the lead in the
-matter of substitution. This was particularly seen in the dismissal of
-the bishops of Italy, and the appointment of their successors. Rome was
-also the central authority of the churches of Africa.
-
-This authority was already excessive, and showed itself above all in the
-affair of the Passover. This question was much more important than it
-appears to us. In the early times all Christians continued to make the
-Jewish Passover their principal feast. They celebrated this feast on the
-same day as the Jews,--on the 14th of Nisan, upon whatever day of the
-week it happened to fall. Persuaded, according to the account of all the
-old gospels, that Jesus, the evening before his death, had eaten the
-Passover with his disciples, they regarded such a solemnity as a
-commemoration of the last supper, rather than as a memorial of the
-resurrection. As Christianity became more and more separated from
-Judaism, such a manner of regarding it was very much questioned. At
-first a new tradition was promulgated,--that Jesus, being about to die,
-had not eaten the Passover, but had died the very day of the Jewish
-feast, thus constituting himself the Pascal Lamb. Moreover, this purely
-Jewish feast wounded the Christian conscience, especially in the
-churches of Paul. The great feast of the Christians, the resurrection of
-Jesus, occurred in any case the Sunday after the Jewish Passover.
-According to this idea, the feast was celebrated the Sunday which
-followed the Friday after the 14th of Nisan.
-
-In Rome this custom prevailed, at least since the pontificates of Xystus
-and Telesphorus (about 120). In Asia there were great divisions. The
-conservatives, like Polycarp, Meliton, and all the ancient school,
-believed that the old Jewish custom conformed to the first Gospels and
-to the usage of the apostles John and Philip. This was the object of the
-voyage to Rome which Polycarp undertook about the year 154, under the
-Pope Anicetus. The interview between Polycarp and Anicetus was very
-cordial. The discussion of certain points appears to have been sharp,
-but they understood each other. Polycarp was not able to persuade
-Anicetus to renounce a practice which had been that of the bishops of
-Rome before his time. Anicetus, on the other hand, hesitated when
-Polycarp told him that he governed himself according to the rule of John
-and the other apostles, with whom he had lived on a familiar footing.
-The two religious leaders remained in full communion with each other;
-and Anicetus showed Polycarp an almost unprecedented honor. In fact he
-desired that Polycarp, in the Assembly of the Faithful at Rome, should
-pronounce, in his stead and in his presence, the words of the
-eucharistic consecration. These ardent men were full of too lofty a
-sentiment to rest the unity of their souls upon the uniformity of rites
-and exterior observances.
-
-Later, unhappily, Rome took the stand of insisting upon its right. About
-the year 196 the question was more exciting than ever. The churches of
-Asia persisted in their old usage. Rome, always enthusiastic for unity,
-wished to coerce them. Upon the invitation of Pope Victor, convocations
-of bishops were held: a vast correspondence was exchanged. But the
-bishops of Asia, strong in the tradition of two apostles and of so many
-illustrious men, would not submit. The old Polycrates, Bishop of
-Ephesus, wrote in their name a very sharp letter to Victor and to the
-Church of Rome. The incredible design which Victor conceived on account
-of the acrimony of this letter proves that the Papacy was already born,
-and well born. He pretended to excommunicate, to separate from the
-Universal Church, the most illustrious province, because it had not bent
-its traditions before the Roman discipline. He published a decree by
-virtue of which Asia was placed under the ban of the Christian
-community. But the other bishops opposed this violent measure, and
-recalled Victor to charity. St. Irenæus, in particular, who, through the
-necessity of the country in which he lived, had accepted for himself and
-his churches in Gaul the Occidental custom, could not support the
-thought that the mother-churches of Asia, to which he felt himself bound
-in the depths of his soul, should be separated from the body of the
-Universal Church. He energetically persuaded Victor from the
-excommunication of the churches which held to the traditions of their
-fathers, and recalled to him the examples of his more tolerant
-predecessors. This act of rare good sense prevented the schism of the
-Orient and the Occident from occurring in the second century. Irenæus
-wrote to the bishops on all sides, and the question remained open to the
-churches of Asia.
-
-In one sense, the process which brought about the debate was of more
-importance than the debate itself. By reason of this difference, the
-Church was brought to a clearer idea of its organization. And first it
-was evident that the laity were no longer any thing. The bishops alone
-handled questions, and promulgated their opinions. The bishops collected
-together in provincial synods, over which the bishop of the capital of
-the province presided (the archbishop of the future), or, at times, the
-oldest bishop. The synodal assembly came out with a letter, which was
-sent to other churches. This was then like an attempt at federative
-organization,--an attempt to resolve questions by means of provincial
-assemblies, presided over by bishops agreeing among themselves. Later,
-questions concerning the presiding over synods and the hierarchy of the
-Church sought solution in the documents of this great debate. Among all
-the churches, that of Rome appeared to have a particular initiative
-right. But that initiative was far from being synonymous with
-infallibility; for Eusebius declares that he read the letters in which
-the bishops severely blamed the conduct of Victor.
-
-
-III.
-
-Authority, gentlemen, loves authority. The authoritaires, as we say
-to-day, in the most diverse ranks, extend the hand to each other. Men as
-conservative as the leaders of the Church of Rome must be strongly
-tempted to favor public force, the effect of which is often for good,
-as they must admit. This tendency had been manifest since the first days
-of Christianity. Jesus had laid down the rule. The image of the money
-was for him the supreme criterion of its lawfulness, beyond which there
-was nothing to seek. In the height of the reign of Nero, St. Paul wrote,
-"Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power
-but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever,
-therefore, resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God." Some
-years later, Peter, or the person who wrote in his name the Epistle
-known as the First of Peter, expresses himself in an identical manner.
-Clement was an equally devoted subject of the Roman Empire.
-
-In fine, one of the traits of St. Luke (according to my idea there was a
-bond between St. Luke and the spirit of the church at Rome) is his
-respect of the imperial authority, and the precautions which he took not
-to injure it. The author of the Acts evaded every thing which would
-present the Romans as the enemies of Christ. On the contrary, he seeks
-to show, that, under many circumstances, they defended St. Paul and the
-Christians against the Jews. Never a disparaging word against the civil
-magistrates. Luke loved to show how the Roman functionaries were
-favorable to the new religion, sometimes even embracing it; and how
-Roman justice was equitable, and superior to the passions of the local
-powers. He insists upon the advantages which Paul owed to his title of
-Roman citizen. If he ends his recital with the arrival of Paul at Rome,
-it is perhaps in order not to recount the monstrosities of Nero.
-
-Without doubt, there were in other parts of the empire devoted
-Christians who sympathized entirely with the anger of the Jews, and
-dreamed only of the destruction of the idolatrous city which they
-identified with Babylon. Such were the authors of apocalypses and
-sibylline writings. But the faithful of the great churches were of quite
-a different way of thinking. In 70, the Church of Jerusalem, with a
-sentiment more Christian than patriotic, left the revolutionary city,
-and sought peace beyond the Jordan. In the revolt of Barkokébas, the
-division was still more pronounced. Not a single Christian was willing
-to take part in this attempt of blind despair. St. Justin in his
-Apologies never combats the principle of empire. He desired that the
-empire should examine the Christian doctrine, approve and countersign it
-in some way, and condemn those who calumniated it. The most learned
-doctor of the time of Marcus Aurelius, Meliton, Bishop of Sardis, made
-still more decided advances, and undertook to show that there is always
-in Christianity something to recommend it to a true Roman. In his
-Treaty upon Truth, preserved in Syriac, Meliton expresses himself in the
-same way as a bishop of the fourth century, explaining to one Theodosius
-that his first duty is to establish by his authority the triumph of
-truth (without telling us, alas! by what sign one recognizes truth). Let
-the empire become Christian, and the persecuted of to-day would find
-that the interference of the state in the domain of conscience is
-perfectly legitimate.
-
-The system of the apologists, so warmly sustained by Tertullian,
-according to which the good emperors favored Christianity, and the bad
-ones persecuted it, was already full blown. "Born together," said they,
-"Christianity and the empire have grown up together, and prospered
-together." Their interests, their sufferings, their fortunes, their
-future,--all was in common. The apologists were advocates; and advocates
-in all orders resemble each other. They have arguments for every
-situation and all tastes. Nearly a hundred and fifty years rolled on
-before these sweet and half sincere invitations were understood. But the
-only impression they made in the time of Marcus Aurelius upon the mind
-of one of the most enlightened leaders of the Church was as a prognostic
-of the future. Christianity and the empire will become reconciled. They
-are made for each other. The shade of Meliton will tremble with joy
-when the empire becomes Christian, and the emperor takes in hand the
-cause of truth.
-
-Thus the Church already took more than one step toward empire. Through
-politeness, without doubt, but only as a very legitimate consequence of
-his principles, Meliton does not allow that an emperor can give an
-unjust order. It was easy to believe that certain emperors had not been
-absolutely opposed to Christianity. It is pleasant to relate that
-Tiberius had proposed to place Jesus in the rank of the gods: it was the
-senate which objected. The decided preference of Christianity for power
-where it hopes for favors is already very transparent. It is shown,
-contrary to all truth, that Hadrian and Antonine sought to repair the
-evil done by Nero and Domitian. Tertullian and his generation say the
-same thing of Marcus Aurelius. Tertullian doubted, it is true, whether
-one could be at the same time a Cæsar and a Christian; but this
-incompatibility a century later struck no one, and Constantine proved
-that Meliton of Sardis was a very sagacious man when he discerned so
-well--a century and a half in advance, seeing through the proconsular
-persecutions--the possibility of a Christian Empire.
-
-The hatred of Christianity and of the empire was that of men who must
-one day love them. Under the Severi, the language of the Church remained
-plaintive and tender, as it had been under the Antonines. The
-apologists affixed a species of legitimism, a pretension that the Church
-had always from the first saluted the emperor. "There were never among
-us," said Tertullian, "partisans of Cassius, partisans of Albinus,
-partisans of Niger." Foolish illusion! Certainly the revolt of Avidius
-Cassius against Marcus Aurelius was a political crime, and the
-Christians did well not to be involved in it. As for Severus, Albinus,
-and Niger, it was success that decided between them; and the Church had
-no other merit in attaching itself to Severus than that of seeing
-clearly who would be the strongest. This pretended worship of legitimacy
-was in truth only the worship of a fixed fact. The principle of St. Paul
-bore fruit: "All power comes from God: he who holds the sword holds it
-from God for good."
-
-This correct attitude in regard to power clung to exterior necessities
-as much as to the principles which the Church had received from its
-founders. The Church was already a powerful association. It was
-essentially conservative. It needed order and legal guaranties. This was
-admirably shown in the act of Paul of Samos, Bishop of Antioch, under
-Aurelian. The Bishop of Antioch had become a powerful personage at this
-epoch. The goods of the Church were in his keeping: a crowd of men lived
-on his favors. Paul was a brilliant man, somewhat mystical, worldly, a
-great secular lord, seeking to render Christianity acceptable to men of
-the world and authority. The Pietists, as might be expected, considered
-him heretical, and dismissed him. Paul resisted, and refused to quit the
-Episcopal house. See into what the most exalted sects are led! They were
-in possession, and who could decide a question of proprietorship and
-possession, if not the civil authority. Aurelian, about this time,
-passed on his way towards Antioch; and the question was referred to him.
-Here was seen this original spectacle of an infidel sovereign and
-persecutor deputed to decide which was the true bishop. Aurelian showed
-under these circumstances remarkably good sense for a layman. He
-examined the correspondence of the two bishops, took note as to which
-was in relation with Rome and Italy, and decided that he was the true
-Bishop of Antioch.
-
-Aurelian made some objections to the theological reasoning used on this
-occasion; but one fact was evident: it was, that Christianity could not
-live without the empire, and that the empire, on the other hand, could
-not do better than adopt Christianity as its religion. The world desired
-a religion of congregations, of churches, or of synagogues and
-chapels,--a religion in which the essence of the worship should be
-re-union, association, and fraternity. Christianity answered to all
-these conditions. Its admirable worship, its well-organized clergy,
-assured its future.
-
-Several times in the third century this historical necessity fell short
-of realization. This is seen most plainly under those Syrian emperors
-whom their quality of foreigners and base origin placed beyond
-prejudices, and who, in spite of their vices, inaugurated a largeness of
-ideas and a tolerance hitherto unknown. Those Syrian women of
-Emesa,--Julia Domna, Julia Mæsa, Julia Mammæa, Julia Soemia,--beautiful,
-intelligent, perfectly fearless, and held by no tradition or social law,
-hesitated at nothing. They did what Roman women would never have dared.
-They entered the Senate, deliberated there, and governed the empire
-effectively, dreaming of Semiramis and Nitocris. The Roman worship
-seemed cold and insignificant to them. Not being bound by any family
-reasons, and their imagination being more in harmony with Christianity
-than with Italian Paganism, these women amused themselves with the
-recitals of the deed of the gods upon earth. Philostratus enchanted them
-with his "Life of Apollonius Tyane." Perhaps they had more than one
-secret affinity with Christianity. Certainly Heliogabalus was mad; and
-yet his chimera of a central, Monotheistic worship, established at Rome,
-and absorbing all the other worships, proved that the narrow circle of
-ideas of the Antonines was broken. Alexander Severus went still farther.
-He was sympathetic with the Christians: not content with according them
-liberty, he placed Jesus in his lararium with a touching eclecticism.
-Peace seemed to be made, not, as under Constantine, by the defection of
-one of the parties, but by a large reconciliation. The same thing was
-seen again under Philip the Arab, in the East under Zenobia, and
-generally under those emperors whose foreign origin placed them beyond
-Roman patriotism.
-
-The struggle redoubled in rage when those grand reformers, Diocletian
-and Maximian, animated by the ancient spirit, believed themselves able
-to give new life for the empire by holding it to the narrow circle of
-Roman ideas. The Church triumphed through its martyrs. Roman pride was
-humbled. Constantine saw the interior strength of the Church. The
-population of Asia Minor, Syria, Thrace, and Macedonia, in a word the
-eastern part of the empire, was already more than half Christian. His
-mother, who had been a servant in an inn at Nicomedia, dazzled his eyes
-with the picture of an Eastern empire having its centre near Nicæa or
-Nicomedia, whose nerves should be the bishops and those multitudes of
-poor matriculates of the Church who controlled opinion in large cities.
-Constantine made the empire Christian. From the Occidental point of
-view, that was astonishing; for the Christians were still but a feeble
-minority in the West: in the Orient, the politics of Constantine was not
-only natural, but commanded.
-
-Wonderful thing! The city of Rome received from that politics the
-heaviest blow it had ever suffered. Christianity was successful under
-Constantine; but it was Oriental Christianity. In building a new Rome on
-the Bosphorus, Constantine made the old Rome the capital of the West
-alone. The cataclysms which followed, the invasions of the barbarians
-who spared Constantinople, and fell upon Rome with all their weight,
-reduced the ancient capital of the world to a limited and often humble
-condition. That ecclesiastical primacy of Rome which burst with so much
-effect upon the second and third centuries flourished no longer when the
-Orient had an existence and a separate capital. Constantine was the real
-author of the schism of the Latin Church and the Church of the Orient.
-
-Rome took its revenge, principally by the seriousness and depth of its
-spirit of organization. What men were St. Sylvester, St. Damasus, and
-Gregory the Great! With an admirable courage they labored for the
-conversion of the barbarians, attached them to themselves, and made them
-their friends and subjects. The master-work of its politics was its
-alliance with the Carlovingian house, and the bold stroke by which it
-re-established in that house the empire which had been dead three
-hundred years. The Church of Rome rose again more powerful than ever,
-and became again the centre of all the grand affairs of the Occident
-during eight centuries.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Here my task is ended, gentlemen. You will confide to others the care of
-recounting the prodigious history of the feudal church, its grandeurs
-and its abuses. Another still will show you the re-action against these
-abuses,--Protestantism returning to the primitive idea of Christianity,
-and dividing, in its turn, the Latin Church. Each one of these grand
-historical pages will have its charm and its instruction. What I have
-recounted to you is full of grandeur. One is impartial only to the dead.
-Since Catholicism was an inimical power, a danger to the liberty of the
-human mind, it was right to oppose it. Our age is the age of history,
-because it is the age of doubt upon dogmatic matters: it is the age in
-which, without entering into the discussion of systems, an enlightened
-mind says to itself, "If, since right exists, and so many thousand
-symbols have made the pretension of presenting the complete truth, and
-if this pretension is always found vain, is it indeed probable that I
-shall be more happy than so many others, and that the truth has awaited
-my coming here below in order to make its definite revelation?" There is
-no definite revelation. It is the touching effort of man to render his
-destiny supportable. But its reward is not disdain, it is gratitude.
-Whoever believes that he has something to teach us concerning our
-destiny and our end should be welcome. Recall the account in your old
-histories of the judicious and discreet words of the Saxon chief of
-Northumbria, in the assembly where the question was discussed concerning
-the adoption of the doctrine of the Roman missionaries.
-
-"Perhaps thou rememberest, O king! something which happens sometimes in
-the winter days, when thou art seated at table with thy captains and thy
-men-at-arms; that a good fire is lighted, that thy chamber is very warm,
-while it rains, snows, and blows without. There comes a little bird,
-which crosses the chamber on the wing, entering at one door, and going
-out by the other. The moment of this passage is full of sweetness for
-him: he no more feels the rain nor the storm. The bird is gone in an
-instant, and from the winter he passes again into the winter. Such seems
-to me the life of men on this earth, and its course of a moment,
-compared to the length of time which precedes and follows it. The time
-before birth and after death is gloomy. It torments us by its
-impossibility of comprehension: if, then, the new doctrine can teach us
-any thing a little certain, it deserves to be considered."
-
-Alas! the Roman missionaries did not bear this minimum of certainty,
-with which the old Northumbrian chief, sage as he was, declared himself
-content. Life always appears to us a short passage between two long
-nights. Happy those who can sleep in the empty noise of menaces which
-trouble at times the human conscience, and should no more than cradle
-it! One thing is certain: it is the paternal smile which at certain
-hours pierces nature, attesting that one eye regards us, and one heart
-follows us. Let us guard ourselves from all absolute formula which might
-become one day an obstacle to the free expansion of our spirits. There
-is no religious communion which does not still possess some gifts of
-life and pardon; but it is on the condition only that an humble docility
-succeeds sympathetic adhesion. The comparison of the regiment, invented
-by Clement Romanus, and since so many times repeated, ought to be
-utterly abandoned.
-
-You wished that I should recall to you the grandeurs of Catholicism in
-its finest epoch. I thank you for it. Some associations of childhood,
-the most profound of all, attach me to Catholicism; and, although I am
-separated from it, I am often tempted to say, as Job said (at least in
-our Latin version), "_Etiam si occideret me, in ipso sperabo._" This
-great Catholic family is too numerous not to have still a grand future.
-The strange excesses which it has supported during fifty years, this
-unequalled pontificate of Pius IX., the most astonishing in history,
-cannot be terminated in any ordinary way. There will be thunders and
-lightnings such as accompany all the great judgment-days of God. And
-will she have much to do in order to still remain acceptable to those
-who love her,--this old mother, who will not die so soon? Perhaps she
-will find, in order to arrest the arms of her conqueror, which is modern
-reason, some magician's arts, some words such as Balder murmured.
-
-The Catholic Church is a woman: let us distrust the charming words of
-her agony. Let us imagine that she says to us, "My children, every thing
-here below is but a symbol and a dream. In this world there is only one
-little ray of light which pierces the darkness, and seems to be the
-reflection of a benevolent will. Come into my bosom, where one finds
-forgetfulness. For those who wish fetishes, I have them; to those who
-wish works, I offer them; for those who wish intoxication of heart, I
-have the milk of my breast, which will make drunk; for those who desire
-love, I have an abundance; to those who crave irony, I pour out freely.
-Come all: the time of dogmatic sadness is past. I have music and incense
-for your funerals, flowers for your marriages, the joyous welcome of
-bells for your new-born ones." Ah, well! if she should say that, our
-embarrassment would be extreme. But she never will.
-
-Your great and glorious England has resolved, gentlemen, the practical
-part of the question. It is as easy to trace the line of conduct which
-the state and individuals should follow in the same matter, as it is
-impossible to arrive at a theoretic solution of the religious problem.
-All this may be conveyed in a single word, gentlemen,--_liberty_. What
-could be more simple? Faith does not control itself. We believe what we
-believe true. No one is bound to believe what he thinks false, whether
-it is false or not. To deny liberty of thought is a sort of
-contradiction. From liberty of thought to the right to express one's
-thought, there is but one step; for right is the same for all. I have no
-right to prevent a person from expressing his mind; but no one has the
-right to prevent me from expressing mine. Here is a theory which will
-appear very humble to the learned doctors who believe themselves to be
-in possession of absolute truth. We have a great advantage over them,
-gentlemen. They are obliged to be persecutors in order to be consistent;
-to us it is permitted to be tolerant,--tolerant for all, even for those,
-who, if they could, would not be so to us. Yes, let us even make this
-paradox: liberty is the best weapon against the enemies of liberty. Some
-fanatics say to us with sincerity, "We take your liberty, because you
-owe it to us according to your principles; but you shall not have ours,
-because we do not owe it to you." Ah, well! let us give them liberty
-all the same, and we do not imagine that in this exchange we shall be
-duped. No: liberty is the great dissolvent of all fanaticisms. In giving
-back liberty to my enemy, who would suppress me if he had the power, I
-shall really make him the worst gift. I oblige him to drink a strong
-beverage which shall turn his head, while I shall keep my own. Science
-supports the strange _régime_ of liberty: fanaticism and superstition do
-not support it. We do more harm to dogmatism by treating it with an
-implacable sweetness than by persecuting it. By this sweetness we even
-inculcate the principle which destroys all dogmatism at its root, by
-understanding that all metaphysical controversy is sterile, and that,
-for this reason, the truth for each one is as he believes it. The
-essential, then, is not to silence dangerous teaching, and hush the
-discordant voice: the essential is to place the human mind in a state in
-which the mass can see the uselessness of its rage. When this spirit
-becomes the atmosphere of society, the fanatic can no longer live. He is
-conquered by a pervading gentleness. If, instead of conducting
-Polyeuctus to punishment, the Roman magistrate had dismissed him
-smiling, and taken him amicably by the hand, Polyeuctus would not have
-continued: perhaps even in his old age he would have laughed at his
-escapade, and would have become a man of good sense.
-
-
-
-
- CONFERENCE,
-
- Royal Academy, London, April 16, 1880.
-
- MARCUS AURELIUS.
-
-
-
-
-CONFERENCE AT THE ROYAL INSTITUTION.
-
-MARCUS AURELIUS.
-
-
-Ladies and Gentlemen,--I have accepted with great pleasure the
-invitation to address you in this illustrious institution devoted to the
-noblest researches of science and of true philosophy. I have dreamed
-since my childhood of this island, where I have so many friends, and
-which I visit so tardily.
-
-I am a Briton of France. In our old books, England is always called the
-Island of the Saints; and, in truth, all our saints of Armorican
-Brittany, those saints of doubtful orthodoxy, who, if they were again
-alive, would be more in harmony with us than with the Jesuits, came from
-the Island of Britain. I have seen in their chapel the trough of stone
-in which they crossed the sea. Of all races, the Britain race is that
-which has ever taken religion the most seriously. Even when the progress
-of reflection has shown us that some articles among the catalogues of
-things which we have always regarded as fixed should be modified, we
-never break away from the symbol under which we have from the first
-approved the ideal.
-
-For our faith is not contained in obscure metaphysical propositions: it
-is in the affirmations of the heart. I have therefore chosen for my
-discourse to you, not one of those subtleties which divide, but one of
-those themes, dear to the soul, which bring nearer, and reconcile. I
-shall speak to you of that book resplendent with the divine spirit, that
-manual of submissive life which the most godly of men has left us,--the
-Cæsar, Marcus Aurelius Antonine. It is the glory of sovereigns that the
-most irreproachable model of virtue may be found in their ranks, and
-that the most beautiful lessons of patience and of self-control may come
-from a condition which one naturally believes to be subject to all the
-seductions of pleasure and of vanity.
-
-
-I.
-
-The inheritance of wisdom with a throne is always rare: I find in
-history but two striking examples of it,--in India, the succession of
-the three Mongol emperors, Bâber, Hoomâyoon, and Akbar; at Rome, at the
-head of the greatest empire that ever existed, the two admirable reigns
-of Antonine the Pious and Marcus Aurelius. Of the last two, I consider
-Antonine the greatest. His goodness did not lead him into faults: he was
-not tormented with that internal trouble which disturbed without
-ceasing the heart of his adopted son. This strange malady, this restless
-study of himself, this demon of scrupulousness, this fever of
-perfection, are signs of a less strong and distinguished nature. As the
-finest thoughts are those which are not written, Antonine had in this
-respect also a superiority over Marcus Aurelius. But let us add that we
-should be ignorant of Antonine, if Marcus Aurelius had not transmitted
-to us that exquisite portrait of his adopted father, in which he seems
-to have applied himself, through humility, to painting the picture of a
-better man than himself.
-
-It is he who has sketched in the first book of his "Thoughts,"--that
-admirable background where the noble and pure forms of his father,
-mother, grandfather, and tutors, move in a celestial light. Thanks to
-Marcus Aurelius, we are able to understand how these old Roman families,
-who had seen the reign of the wicked emperors, still retained honesty,
-dignity, justice, the civil, and, if I may dare to say it, the
-republican spirit. They lived there in admiration of Cato, of Brutus, of
-Thrasea, and of the great stoics whose souls had never bowed under
-tyranny. The reign of Domitian was abhorred by them. The sages who had
-endured it without submission were honored as heroes. The accession of
-the Antonines was only the coming to power of the society of sages, of
-whose just anger Tacitus has informed us,--a society of wise men formed
-by the league of all those who had revolted against the despotism of the
-first Cæsars.
-
-The salutary principle of adoption made the imperial court of the second
-century a true cradle of virtue. The noble and learned Nerva, in
-establishing this principle, assured the happiness of the human race
-during almost a hundred years, and gave to the world the best century of
-progress of which any knowledge has been preserved. The sovereignty thus
-possessed in common by a group of choice men who delegated it or shared
-it, according to the needs of the moment, lost a part of that attraction
-which renders it so dangerous.
-
-Men came to the throne without seeking it, but also without the right of
-birth, or in any sense the divine right: men came there understanding
-themselves, experienced, having been long prepared. The empire was a
-civil burden which each accepted in his turn, without dreaming of
-hastening the hour. Marcus Aurelius was made emperor so young, that the
-idea of ruling had scarcely occurred to him, and had not for a moment
-exercised its charm upon his mind.
-
-At eight years, when he was already _præsul_ of the Salian priests,
-Hadrian remarked this sad child, and loved him for his good-nature, his
-docility, and his incapability of falsehood. At eighteen years the
-empire was assured to him. He awaited it patiently for twenty-two years.
-The evening when Antonine, feeling himself about to die, after having
-given to the tribune the watchword, _Æquanimitas_, commanded the golden
-statue of Fortune, which was always in the apartment of the emperor, to
-be borne into that of his adopted son, he experienced neither surprise
-nor joy.
-
-He had long been sated with all joys, without having tasted them: he had
-seen the absolute vanity of them by the profoundness of his philosophy.
-
-The great inconvenience of practical life, and that which renders it
-insupportable to a superior man, is, that, if one carries into it the
-principles of the ideal, talents become defects; so that very often the
-accomplished man is less successful in it than one who is fitted by
-egotism or ordinary routine. Three or four times the virtue of Marcus
-Aurelius came near being his ruin. The first fault into which it led him
-was that of sharing the empire with Lucius Verus, to whom he was under
-no obligation. Verus was a frivolous and worthless man. Prodigies of
-goodness and delicacy were necessary in order to prevent his committing
-disastrous follies. The wise emperor, earnest and industrious, took with
-him in his _lectica_ (sedan) the senseless colleague whom he had given
-himself. He persisted in treating him seriously: he never once revolted
-against this sorry companionship. Like all well-bred men, Marcus
-Aurelius discommoded himself continually: his manners came from a
-general habit of firmness and dignity. Souls of this kind, either from
-respect for human nature, or in order not to wound others, resign
-themselves to the appearance of seeing no evil. Their life is a
-perpetual dissimulation.
-
-According to some, he even deceived himself, since, in his intimate
-intercourse with the gods, on the borders of the Granicus, speaking of
-his unworthy wife, he thanked them for having given him a wife "so
-amiable, so affectionate, so pure." I have shown elsewhere that the
-patience, or, if one chooses, the weakness, on this point, of Marcus
-Aurelius, has been somewhat exaggerated. Faustina had faults: the
-greatest one was that she disliked the friends of her husband; and, as
-these friends wrote history, she has paid the penalty before posterity.
-But a discriminating critic has no trouble in showing the exaggerations
-of the legend. Every thing indicates that Faustina at first found
-happiness and love in that villa at Lorium, or in that beautiful retreat
-at Lanuvium upon the highest points of the Alban mount, which Marcus
-Aurelius described to his tutor Fronto as an abode full of the purest
-joys. Then she became weary of too much wisdom. Let us tell all: the
-beautiful sentences of Marcus Aurelius, his austere virtue, his
-perpetual melancholy, might have become tiresome to a young and
-capricious woman possessed of an ardent temperament and marvellous
-beauty. He understood it, suffered it, and spoke not. Faustina remained
-always his "very good and very faithful wife." No one succeeded, even
-after her death, in persuading him to give up this pious lie. In a
-bas-relief which is still seen in the Museum of the Capitol at Rome,
-while Faustina is borne to heaven by a messenger of the gods, the
-excellent emperor regards her with a look full of love. It seems that at
-last he had deceived himself, and forgotten all. But through what a
-struggle he must have passed in order to do this! During long years, a
-sickness at heart slowly consumed him. The desperate effort which was
-the essence of his philosophy, this frenzy of renunciation, carried
-sometimes even to sophism, concealed an immense wound at the bottom. How
-necessary it must have been to bid adieu to happiness in order to reach
-such an excess! No one will ever understand all that this poor wounded
-heart suffered, the bitterness which that pale face concealed, always
-calm, always smiling. It is true that the farewell to happiness is the
-beginning of wisdom and the surest means of finding peace. There is
-nothing so sweet as the return of joy which follows the renunciation of
-joy; nothing so keen, so profound, so charming, as the enchantment of
-the disenchanted.
-
-Some historians, more or less imbued with that policy which believes
-itself to be superior, because it is not suspected of any philosophy,
-have naturally sought to prove that so accomplished a man was a bad
-administrator and a mediocre sovereign. It appears, in fact, that Marcus
-Aurelius sinned more than once by too much lenity. But never was there a
-reign more fruitful in reforms and progress. The public charity founded
-by Nerva and Trajan was admirably developed by him. New schools were
-established for poor children; the superintendents of provisions became
-functionaries of the first rank, and were chosen with extreme care;
-while the wants of poor young girls were cared for by the Institute of
-_Jeunes Faustiniennes_. The principle that the state has duties in some
-degree paternal towards its members (a principle which should be
-remembered with gratitude, even when it has been dispensed with),--this
-principle, I say, was proclaimed for the first time in the world by
-Trajan and his successors. Neither the puerile pomp of Oriental
-kingdoms, founded on the baseness and stupidity of men, nor the pedantic
-pride of the kingdoms of the middle ages, founded on an exaggerated
-sentiment for hereditary succession, and on a simple faith in the rights
-of blood, could give an idea of the utterly republican sovereignty of
-Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonine, and Marcus Aurelius.
-
-Nothing of the prince by hereditary or divine right, nothing of the
-military chieftain: it was a sort of grand civil magistracy, without
-resembling a court in any way, or depriving the emperor of his private
-character. Marcus Aurelius, in particular, was neither much nor little a
-king in the true sense of the word. His fortune was immense, but all
-employed for good: his aversion for "the Cæsars," whom he considered as
-a species of Sardanapali, magnificent, debauched, and cruel, burst out
-at each instant. The civility of his manners was extreme. He gave to the
-Senate all its ancient importance: when he was at Rome, he never missed
-a session, and left his place only when the Consul had pronounced the
-formula, "_Nihil vos moramar, patres conscripti_." Almost every year of
-his reign he made war, and he made it well, although he found in it only
-_ennui_. His listless campaigns against the Quadi and Marcomanni were
-very well conducted: the disgust which he felt for them did not prevent
-his most conscientious attention to them. It was in the course of one of
-these expeditions, that, encamped on the banks of the Granicus, in the
-midst of the monotonous plains of Hungary, he wrote the most beautiful
-pages of the exquisite book which has revealed his whole soul to us. It
-is probable, that, when very young, he kept a journal of his secret
-thoughts. He inscribed there the maxims to which he had recourse in
-order to fortify himself, the reminiscences of his favorite authors, the
-passages of the moralists which appealed most to him, the principles
-which had sustained him through the day, sometimes the reproaches which
-his scrupulous conscience addressed to him. "One seeks for himself
-solitary retreats, rustic cottages, sea-shore, or mountains: like
-others, thou lovest to dream of these good things. To what end, since it
-is permitted to thee to retire within thy soul each hour? Man has
-nowhere a more tranquil retreat, above all, if he has within himself
-those things, the contemplation of which will calm him. Learn, then, how
-to enjoy this retreat, and there renew thy strength. Let there be those
-short fundamental maxims, which above all will give again serenity to
-thy soul, and restore thee to a state in which to support with
-resignation the world to which thou shouldest return."
-
-During the sad winters of the North, this consolation became still more
-necessary to him. He was nearly sixty years old: old age was premature
-with him. One evening all the pictures of his pious youth returned to
-his remembrance, and he passed some delicious hours in calculating how
-much he owed to each one of the virtuous beings who had surrounded him.
-
-"Examples of my grandfather Verus,--sweetness of manners, unchangeable
-patience."
-
-"Qualities which one valued in my father, the souvenir which he has left
-me,--modesty, manly character."
-
-"To imitate the piety of my mother, her benevolence; to abstain, like
-her, not only from doing evil, but from conceiving the thought of it; to
-lead her frugal life, which so little resembled the habitual luxury of
-the rich."
-
-Then appeared to him, in turn, Diagnotus, who had inspired him with a
-taste for philosophy, and made agreeable to his eyes the pallet, the
-covering made of a simple skin, and all the apparel of Hellenic
-discipline; Junius Rusticus, who taught him to avoid all affectation of
-elegance in style, and loaned him the Conversations of Epictetus;
-Apollonius of Chalcis, who realized the Stoic ideal of extreme firmness
-and perfect sweetness; Sextus of Chaeroneia, so grave and so good;
-Alexander the grammarian, who censured with such refined politeness;
-Fronto, "who taught him the envy, duplicity, and hypocrisy of a tyrant,
-and the hardness which may exist in the heart of a patrician;" his
-brother Severus, "who made him understand Thrasia, Helvidius, Cato,
-Brutus, who gave him the idea of what a free government is, where the
-rule is the natural equality of the citizens and the equality of their
-rights; of a royalty which places before all else the respect for the
-liberty of the citizens;" and, rising above all others in his immaculate
-grandeur, Antonine, his father by adoption, whose picture he traces for
-us with redoubled gratitude and love. "I thank the gods," said he
-finally, "for having given me good ancestors, good parents, a good
-sister, good teachers, and in my surroundings, in my relations, in my
-friends, men almost all filled with goodness. I never allowed myself to
-be wanting in deference towards them: from my natural disposition, I
-could sometimes have shown irreverence; but the benevolence of the gods
-never permitted the occasion to present itself. I am also indebted to
-the gods, who preserved pure the flower of my youth, for having been
-reared under the rule of a prince, and a father who strove to free my
-soul from all trace of pride, to make me understand that it is possible,
-while living in a palace, to dispense with guards, with splendid
-clothes, with torches, with statues, to teach me, in short, that a
-prince can almost contract his life within the limits of that of a
-simple citizen, without, on that account, showing less nobility and
-vigor when he comes to be an emperor, and transact the affairs of state.
-They gave me a brother, whose manners were a continual exhortation to
-watch over myself, while his deference and attachment should have made
-the joy of my heart.
-
-"Thanks to the gods again, that I have made haste to raise those who
-have cared for my education, to the honors which they seemed to desire.
-They have enabled me to understand Apollonius, Rusticus, Maximus, and
-have held out to me, surrounded with brilliant light, the picture of a
-life conformed to nature. I have fallen short of it in the end, it is
-true; but it is my fault. If my body has long supported the rude life
-which I lead; if, in spite of my frequent neglect of Rusticus, I have
-never overstepped the bounds, or done any thing of which I should
-repent; if my mother, who died young, was able, nevertheless, to pass
-her last years near me; if, whenever I have wished to succor the poor or
-afflicted, money has never been wanting; if I have never needed to
-accept any thing from others; if I have a wife of an amiable,
-affectionate, and pure character; if I have found many capable men for
-the education of my children; if, at the beginning of my passion for
-philosophy, I did not become the prey of a sophist,--it is to the gods
-that I owe it all. Yes, so many blessings could only be the result of
-the aid of the gods and a happy fortune."
-
-This divine candor breathes in every page. No one has ever written more
-simply than did he for the sole purpose of unburdening his heart to
-God, his only witness. There is not a shadow of system in it. Marcus
-Aurelius, to speak exactly, had no philosophy: although he owed almost
-every thing to stoicism transformed by the Roman spirit, it is of no
-school. According to our idea, he has too little curiosity; for he knows
-not all that a contemporary of Ptolemy and Galen should know: he has
-some opinions on the system of the world, which were not up to the
-highest science of his time. But his moral thought, thus detached from
-all alliance with a system, reaches a singular height. The author of the
-book, "The Imitation," himself, although free from the quarrels of the
-schools, does not rise to this, for his manner of feeling is essentially
-Christian. Take away his Christian dogmas, and his book retains only a
-portion of its charm. The book of Marcus Aurelius, having no dogmatic
-base, preserves its freshness eternally. Every one, from the atheist, or
-he who believes himself one, to the man who is the most devoted to the
-especial creeds of each worship, can find in it some fruits of
-edification. It is the most purely human book which exists. It deals
-with no question of controversy. In theology, Marcus Aurelius floats
-between pure Deism, Polytheism interpreted in a physical sense according
-to the manner of the Stoics, and a sort of cosmic Pantheism. He holds
-not much more firmly to one hypothesis than to the other, and he uses
-indiscriminately the three vocabularies of the Deist, Polytheist, and
-Pantheist. His considerations have always two sides, according as God
-and the soul have, or have not, reality. It is the reasoning which we do
-each hour; for, if the most complete Materialism is right, we who have
-believed in truth and goodness shall be no more duped than others. If
-Idealism is right, we have been the true sages, and we have been wise in
-the only manner which becomes us, that is to say, with no selfish
-waiting, without having looked for a remuneration.
-
-
-II.
-
-We here touch a great secret of moral philosophy and religion. Marcus
-Aurelius has no speculative philosophy; his theology is utterly
-contradictory; he has no idea founded upon the soul and immortality. How
-could he be so moral without the beliefs that are now regarded as the
-foundations of morality? how so profoundly religious, without having
-professed one of the dogmas of what is called natural religion? It is
-important to make this inquiry.
-
-The doubts, which, to the view of speculative reason, hover above the
-truths of natural religion, are not, as Kant has admirably shown,
-accidental doubts, capable of being removed, belonging, as is sometimes
-imagined, to certain conditions of the human mind. These doubts are
-inherent to the nature even of these truths, if one may say it without a
-paradox; and, if these doubts were removed, the truths with which they
-quarrel would disappear at the same time. Let us suppose, in short, a
-direct, positive proof, evident to all, of future sufferings and
-rewards: where will be the merit of doing good? They would be but fools
-whom gayety of heart should hasten to damnation. A crowd of base souls
-would secure their salvation without concealment: they would, in a
-sense, force the divine power. Who does not see, that, in such a system,
-there is neither morality nor religion? In the moral and religious order
-it is indispensable to believe without demonstration. It deals not with
-certainty: it acts by faith. This is what Deism forgets, with its habits
-of intemperate affirmation. It forgets that creeds too precise
-concerning human destiny would destroy all moral merit. For us, they
-would say that we should do as did St. Louis when he was told of the
-miraculous wafer,--we should refuse to see it. What need have we of
-these brutal proofs which trammel our liberty?
-
-We should fear to become assimilated to those speculators in virtue, or
-those vulgar cowards, who mingle with spiritual things the gross
-selfishness of practical life. In the days which followed the belief in
-the resurrection of Jesus, this sentiment was manifested in the most
-touching manner. The faithful in heart, the sensitive ones, preferred to
-believe without seeing. "Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet
-have believed," became the word for the time. Charming words! Eternal
-symbol of tender and generous Idealism, which has a horror of touching
-with the hands that which should only be seen with the heart!
-
-Our good Marcus Aurelius, on this point as on all others, was in advance
-of the ages. He never cared to argue with himself concerning God and the
-soul. As if he had read the "Criticism of Practical Reason," he saw
-clearly, that, where the Infinite is concerned, no formula is absolute;
-and that, in such matters, one has no chance of seeing the truth during
-his life, without much self-contradiction. He distinctly separates moral
-beauty from all theoretical theology. He allows duty to depend on no
-metaphysical opinion of the First Cause. The intimate union with an
-unseen god was never carried to a more unheard-of delicacy. "To offer to
-the government of God that which is within thee,--a strong being ripened
-by age, a friend of the public good, a Roman, an emperor, a soldier at
-his post awaiting the signal of the trumpet, a man ready to quit life
-without regret." "There are many grains of incense destined to the same
-altar: one falls sooner, the other later, in the fire; but the
-difference is nothing." "Man should live according to nature during the
-few days that are given him on the earth, and, when the moment of
-leaving it comes, should submit himself sweetly, as an olive, which, in
-falling, blesses the tree which has produced it, and renders thanks to
-the branch which has borne it." "All that which thou arrangest is suited
-to me, O Cosmos! Nothing of that which comes from thee is premature or
-backward to me. I find my fruit in that which thy seasons bear, O
-Nature! From thee comes all; in thee is all; to thee all returns." "O
-man! thou hast been a citizen in the great city: what matters it to thee
-to have remained three or five years? That which is governed by laws is
-unjust for no one. What is there, then, so sorrowful in being sent from
-the city, not by a tyrant, not by an unjust judge, but by the same
-nature which allowed thee to enter there? It is as if a comedian is
-discharged from the theatre by the same prætor who engaged him. But wilt
-thou say, 'I have not played the five acts; I have played but three?'
-Thou sayest well; but in life three acts suffice to complete the entire
-piece.... Go, then, content, since he who dismisses thee is content."
-
-Is this to say that he never revolted against the strange fate which
-leaves man alone face to face with the needs of devotion, of sacrifice,
-of heroism, and nature with its transcendent immorality, its supreme
-disdain for virtue? No. Once at least the absurdity, the colossal
-iniquity, of death, strikes him. But soon his temperament, completely
-mortified, resumes its power, and he becomes calm. "How happens it that
-the gods, who have ordered all things so well, and with so much love for
-men, should have forgotten one thing only; that is, that men of tried
-virtue, who during their lives have had a sort of interchange of
-relations with divinity, who have made themselves loved by it on account
-of their pious acts and their sacrifices, live not after death, but may
-be extinguished forever?
-
-"Since it is so, be sure, that, if it should be otherwise, they (the
-gods) would not have failed; for, if it had been just, it would have
-been possible; if it had been suitable to nature, nature would have
-permitted it. Consequently, when it is not thus, strengthen thyself in
-this consideration, that it was not necessary that it should be thus.
-Thou thyself seest plainly that to make such a demand is to dispute his
-right with God. Now, we would not thus contend with the gods if they
-were not absolutely good and absolutely just: if they are so, they have
-allowed nothing to make a part of the order of the world which is
-contrary to justice and right."
-
-Ah! is it too much resignation, ladies and gentlemen? If it is veritably
-thus, we have the right to complain. To say, that, if this world has not
-its counterpart, the man who is sacrificed to truth or right ought to
-leave it content, and absolve the gods,--that is too _naïve_. No, he has
-a right to blaspheme them. For, in short, why has his credulity been
-thus abused? Why should he have been endowed with deceitful instincts,
-of which he has been the honest dupe? Wherefore is this premium given to
-the frivolous or wicked man? Is it, then, he who is not deceived who is
-the wise man? Then cursed be the gods who so adjudge their preferences!
-I desire that the future may be an enigma; but, if there is no future,
-then this world is a frightful ambuscade. Take notice that our wish is
-not that of the vulgar clown. We wish not to see the chastisement of the
-culpable, nor to meddle with the interests of our virtue. Our wish has
-no selfishness: it is simply to be, to remain in accord with light, to
-continue the thought we have begun, to know more of it, to enjoy some
-day that truth which we seek with so much labor, to see the triumph of
-the good which we have loved. Nothing is more legitimate. The worthy
-emperor, moreover, was also sensible of it: "What! the light of a lamp
-burns until the moment in which it is extinguished, and loses nothing of
-its brilliancy, and the truth, justice, temperance, which are in thee
-shall be extinguished with thee!" All his life was passed in this noble
-hesitation. If he sinned, it was through too much piety. Less resigned,
-he would have been more just; for surely to demand that there should be
-an intimate and sympathetic witness of the struggles which we endure for
-goodness and truth is not to ask too much.
-
-It is possible, also, that if his philosophy had been less exclusively
-moral, if it had implied a more curious study of history and of the
-universe, it would have escaped a certain excessive rigor. Like the
-ascetic Christians, Marcus Aurelius sometimes carried renunciation to
-dryness and subtlety. One feels that this calmness, which never belies
-itself, is obtained through an immense effort. Certainly, evil had never
-an attraction for him: he had no passion to struggle against. "Whatever
-one may do or say," writes he, "it is necessary that I should be a good
-man; as the emerald might say, 'Whatever one may say or do, I must
-remain an emerald, and retain my color.'" But, in order to hold one's
-self always upon the icy summit of stoicism, it is necessary to do cruel
-violence to nature, and to cut away from it more than one noble element.
-This perpetual repetition of the same reasoning, the thousand figures
-under which he seeks to represent to himself the vanity of all things,
-these frequently artless proofs of universal frivolity, testify to
-strifes which he has passed through in order to extinguish all desire in
-himself. At times we find in it something harsh and sad. The reading of
-Marcus Aurelius strengthens, but it does not console: it leaves a void
-in the soul which is at once cruel and delightful, which one would not
-exchange for full satisfaction. Humility, renunciation, severity towards
-self, were never carried further. Glory--that last illusion of great
-souls--is reduced to nothingness. It is needful to do right without
-disturbing one's self as to whether any one knows that we do it. He
-perceives that history will speak of him: he sometimes dreams of the men
-of the past with whom the future will associate him. "If they have only
-played the part of tragic actors," said he, "no one has condemned me to
-imitate them." The absolute mortification at which he had arrived had
-destroyed the last fibre of self-love in him.
-
-The consequences of this austere philosophy might have been hardness and
-obstinacy. It is here that the rare goodness of the nature of Marcus
-Aurelius shines out in its full brilliancy. His severity is only for
-himself. The fruit of this great tension of soul is an infinite
-benevolence. All his life was a study of how to return good for evil. At
-evening, after some sad experience of human perversity, he wrote only
-as follows: "If thou canst, correct them; on the other hand, remember
-that thou shouldest exercise benevolence towards those who have been
-given to thee. The gods themselves are benevolent to men: they aid
-them,--so great is their goodness!--to acquire health, riches, glory.
-Thou art permitted to be like the gods." Another day, some one was very
-wicked; for see what he wrote upon his tablets: "Such is the order of
-nature: men of this sort must act thus from necessity. To wish it to be
-otherwise is to wish that the fig-tree shall bear no figs. Remember,
-thou, in one word, this thing: in a very short time thou and he will
-die; soon after, your names even will be known no more." The thoughts of
-a universal pardon recur without ceasing. At times a scarcely
-perceptible smile is mingled with this charming goodness,--"The best
-method of avenging one's self upon the wicked is not to be like them;"
-or a light stroke of pride,--"It is a royal thing to hear evil said of
-one's self when one does right." One day he thus reproached himself:
-"Thou hast forgotten," said he, "what holy relationship unites each man
-to the human race,--a relationship not of blood, or of birth, but the
-participation in the same intelligence. Thou hast forgotten that the
-reasoning power of each one is a god, derived from the Supreme Being."
-
-In the business of life he was always exact, although a little
-ingenuous, as very good men usually are. The nine reasons for
-forbearance which he valued for himself (book xi. art. 18) show us his
-charming good-nature before family troubles, which perhaps came to him
-through his unworthy son. "If, upon occasion," said he to himself, "thou
-exhortest him quietly, and shalt give to him without anger some lessons
-like these,--'No, my child; we are born for each other. It is not I who
-suffer the evil, it is thou who doest it thyself, my child!'--show him
-adroitly, by a general consideration, that such is the rule; that
-neither the bees, nor the animals who live naturally in herds, resemble
-him. Say this without mockery or insult, with an air of true affection,
-with a heart which is not excited by anger; not as a pedant, not for the
-sake of being admired by those who are present; think only of him."
-
-Commodus (if it was for him that he thus acted) was, without doubt,
-little touched by this good paternal rhetoric. One of the maxims of the
-excellent emperor was, that the wicked are unhappy, that one is only
-wicked in spite of himself, and through ignorance. He pitied those who
-were not like himself: he did not believe that he had the right to
-obtrude himself upon them.
-
-He well understood the baseness of men; but he did not avow it. This
-willing blindness is the defect of choice spirits. The world not being
-all that they could wish, they lie to themselves in order not to see it
-as it is. From thence arises an expediency in their judgments. In Marcus
-Aurelius, this expediency sometimes provokes us a little. If we wished
-to believe him, his instructors, several of whom were men of mediocrity,
-were, without exception, superior men. One would say that every one near
-him had been virtuous. This is carried to such a point, that one is
-forced to ask if the brother for whom he pronounces such a grand eulogy
-in his thanks to the gods was not his adopted brother, Lucius Verus. It
-is certain that the good emperor was capable of strong illusions when he
-undertook to lend to others his own virtues.
-
-This quality, expressed as an ancient opinion, especially by the pen of
-the Emperor Julian, caused him to commit an enormous error, which was
-that of not disinheriting Commodus. This is one of those things which it
-is easy to say at a distance, when there are no obstacles present, and
-when one reasons without facts. It is forgotten at first that the
-emperors, who, after Nerva, made adoption so fruitful a political
-system, had no sons. Adoption, with the exheredation of the son or
-grandson, occurred in the first century of the empire without good
-results. Marcus Aurelius was evidently from principle in favor of
-direct inheritance, in which he saw the advantage of the prevention of
-competition.
-
-After the birth of Commodus, in 161, he presented him alone to the
-people, although he had a twin-brother: he frequently took him in his
-arms and renewed this act, which was a sort of proclamation. In 166
-Lucius Verus demanded that the two sons of Marcus, Commodus and Annius
-Verus, should be made Cæsars. In 172 Commodus shared with his father the
-title of Germanicus. In 173, after the repression of the revolt of
-Avidius, the Senate, in order to recognize in some way the family
-disinterestedness which Marcus Aurelius had shown, demanded by
-acclamation the empire and the tribunitial power for Commodus.
-
-Already the natural wickedness of the latter had betrayed itself by more
-than one symptom known to his tutors; but how shall one foresee the
-future from a few naughty acts of a child of twelve years? In 176-177
-his father made him _Imperator_, Consul, Augustus. This was certainly an
-imprudence; but he was bound by his previous acts: Commodus, moreover,
-still restrained himself. In later years, the evil completely revealed
-itself. On each page of the last books of the "Thoughts," we see the
-trace of the martyr within the excellent father, of the accomplished
-emperor, who saw a monster growing up beside him, ready to succeed him,
-and to take in every thing through antipathy, the opposite course from
-that which he had believed to be for the good of men. The thought of
-disinheriting Commodus must, without doubt, have come often to Marcus
-Aurelius. But it was too late. After having associated him in the
-empire, after having so many times proclaimed him to the legions as
-perfect and accomplished, to come before the world and declare him to be
-unworthy would be a scandal. Marcus was caught in his own phrases, by
-that style of benevolent expediency which was too habitual with him.
-And, after all, Commodus was only seventeen years old: who could be sure
-that he would not reform? Even after the death of Marcus Aurelius this
-was hoped for. Commodus at first showed the intention of following the
-counsels of meritorious persons with whom his father had surrounded him.
-
-The reproach which is made, then, against Marcus Aurelius, is not that
-of not having, but of having, a son. It was not his fault if the age
-could not support so much wisdom. In philosophy, the great emperor had
-placed the ideal of virtue so high, that no one would care to follow
-him. In politics, his benevolent optimism had enfeebled the state
-services, above all, the army. In religion, in order not to be too much
-bound by a religion of the state, of which he saw the weakness, he
-prepared the great triumph of the non-official worship, and left a
-reproach to hover above his memory,--unjust, it is true; but even its
-shadow should not be found in so pure a life. We touch here upon one of
-the most delicate points in the biography of Marcus Aurelius. It is
-unhappily certain, that, under his reign, Christians were condemned to
-death, and executed. The policy of his predecessors had been firm in
-this particular. Trajan, Antonine, Hadrian himself, saw in the
-Christians a secret sect, anti-social, dreaming of overturning the
-empire. Like all men true to the old Roman principles, they believed in
-the necessity of repressing them. There was no need of special edicts:
-the laws against the _c[oe]tus illiciti_, the _illicita collegia_, were
-numerous. The Christians fell in the most explicit sense under the force
-of these laws. Truly, it would have been worthy of the wise emperor who
-introduced so many reforms full of humanity, to suppress the edicts
-which entailed such cruel and unjust consequences. But it is necessary
-to observe primarily, that the true spirit of liberty, as we understand
-it, was not then understood by any one; and that Christianity, when it
-was master, practised it no more than the Pagan emperors. In the second
-place, the abrogation of the laws against illicit societies would have
-been the ruin of the empire, founded essentially upon the principle that
-the state ought not to admit within its bosom any society differing
-from it. The principle was bad, according to our ideas: it is very
-certain, at least, that it was the corner-stone in the Roman
-constitution. Marcus Aurelius, far from exaggerating it, extenuated it
-with all his powers; and one of the glories of his reign is the
-extension of the right of association. However, he did not go to the
-root: he did not completely abolish the laws against the _collegia
-illicita_, and in the provinces there resulted from them some processes
-infinitely to be regretted. The reproach which can be made against him
-is the same that might be made to the rulers of our day, who do not
-suppress with a stroke of the pen all the laws restrictive of the
-liberties of re-union, of association, and of the press.
-
-From the distance at which we stand, we can see that Marcus Aurelius, in
-being more completely liberal, would have been wiser. Perhaps
-Christianity left free would have developed in a manner less disastrous
-the theocratic and absolute principle which was in it; but one cannot
-reproach a man with not having stirred up a radical revolution on
-account of a prevision of what would occur several centuries after him.
-Trajan, Hadrian, Antonine, Marcus Aurelius, could not know the
-principles of general history and political economy which have been
-understood only in our time, and which only our last revolutions could
-reveal. In any case, the mansuetude of the good emperor was in this
-respect shielded from all reproach. No one has the right to be more
-exacting in this respect than was Tertullian. "Consult your annals,"
-said he to the Roman magistrates. "You will then see that the princes
-who have been severe towards us are of those who have held to the honor
-of having been our persecutors. On the contrary, all the princes who
-have respected divine and human laws include but one who persecuted the
-Christians. We can even name one of them who declared himself their
-protector,--the wise Marcus Aurelius. If he did not openly revoke the
-edicts against our brethren, he destroyed their power by the severe
-penalties which he declared against their accusers." It is necessary to
-remember that the Roman Empire was ten or twelve times as large as
-France, and that the responsibility of the emperor was very little in
-the judgments which were rendered in the provinces. It is necessary,
-moreover, to recall the fact that Christianity claimed not only the
-liberty of worship: all the creeds which tolerated each other were
-allowed much freedom in the empire. Christianity and Judaism were the
-exceptions to this rule on account of their intolerance and spirit of
-exclusion.
-
-We have, then, good reason to mourn sincerely for Marcus Aurelius. Under
-him philosophy reigned. One moment, thanks to him, the world was
-governed by the best and greatest man of his age. Frightful decadences
-followed; but the little casket which contained the "Thoughts" on the
-banks of the Granicus was saved. From it came forth that incomparable
-book in which Epictetus was surpassed, that Evangel of those who believe
-not in the supernatural, which has not been comprehended until our day.
-Veritable, eternal Evangel, the book of "Thoughts," which will never
-grow old, because it asserts no dogma. The virtue of Marcus Aurelius,
-like our own, rests upon reason, upon nature. St. Louis was a very
-virtuous man, because he was a Christian: Marcus Aurelius was the most
-godly of men, not because he was a Pagan, but because he was a gifted
-man. He was the honor of human nature, and not of an established
-religion. Science may yet destroy, in appearance, God and the immortal
-soul; but the book of the "Thoughts" will still remain young with life
-and truth.
-
-The religion of Marcus Aurelius is the absolute religion, that which
-results from the simple fact of a high moral conscience placed face to
-face with the universe. It is of no race, neither of any country. No
-revolution, no change, no discovery, will have power to affect it.
-
-
-
-
- Transcriber's Notes:
-
- Phrases in italics are indicated by _italics_.
-
- Words in the text which were in small-caps were
- converted to title-case.
-
- The "oe" ligature is indicated by "[oe]" (e.g. Ph[oe]nician).
-
- Missing word added:
- pg 34 the word "it" has been added to the phrase:
- "if (it) had been announced"
-
- Words re-arranged:
- pg 126 "the be strongest" --> "be the strongest"
-
- Typos corrected:
- pg 32 "Pysche" --> "Psyche"
- pg 54 "apochryphal" --> "apocryphal"
- pg 95 "Judean" --> "Judæan" (2 occurrences)
- pg 109 "Mithracism" --> "Mithraicism"
- pg 150 "ctizens" --> "citizens"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of English Conferences of Ernest Renan, by
-Ernest Renan
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLISH CONFERENCES ***
-
-***** This file should be named 42865-8.txt or 42865-8.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/4/2/8/6/42865/
-
-Produced by Charlene Taylor, Michael Seow and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
-http://gutenberg.org/license).
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
-http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
-809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
-business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
-information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
-page at http://pglaf.org
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit http://pglaf.org
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- http://www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/42865-8.zip b/42865-8.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index fd57b6e..0000000
--- a/42865-8.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/42865-h.zip b/42865-h.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index e2d9967..0000000
--- a/42865-h.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/42865-h/42865-h.htm b/42865-h/42865-h.htm
index 9917270..5a8c4a5 100644
--- a/42865-h/42865-h.htm
+++ b/42865-h/42865-h.htm
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
<title>
The Project Gutenberg eBook of English Conferences of Ernest Renan, translated by Clara Erskine Clement.
@@ -105,49 +105,7 @@ table {
</style>
</head>
<body>
-
-
-<pre>
-
-Project Gutenberg's English Conferences of Ernest Renan, by Ernest Renan
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-
-Title: English Conferences of Ernest Renan
- Rome and Christianity. Marcus Aurelius
-
-Author: Ernest Renan
-
-Translator: Clara Erskine Clement
-
-Release Date: June 3, 2013 [EBook #42865]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLISH CONFERENCES ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Charlene Taylor, Michael Seow and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-
-
-
-
-</pre>
-
-
-
-
+<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 42865 ***</div>
<h1 class="higher"><span class="larger">ENGLISH CONFERENCES</span><br />
<span class="smaller">OF</span><br />
@@ -280,8 +238,8 @@ sense, has been retained as best expressing the author's original title,
<p>Ladies and Gentlemen,&mdash;I was proud and happy to receive from the
curators of this noble institution an invitation to continue here an
-instruction inaugurated by my illustrious confrère and friend, Max
-Müller, the usefulness of which will be more and more appreciated. A
+instruction inaugurated by my illustrious confrère and friend, Max
+Müller, the usefulness of which will be more and more appreciated. A
broad and sincere thought always bears fruit. It is thirty years since
the venerable Robert Hibbert made a legacy for the purpose of aiding the
progress of enlightened Christianity, inseparable, according to his
@@ -430,7 +388,7 @@ him.</p>
<p>The consequence of this essentially political character was, that the
Roman religion remained always an aristocratic religion. A man became
-pontiff as he became prætor or consul. When a man desired these
+pontiff as he became prætor or consul. When a man desired these
religious functions, he submitted to no examination; he went into no
retreat in a seminary; he did not ask himself whether he had the
ecclesiastical vocation: he proved that he had served his country well,
@@ -457,7 +415,7 @@ priesthood for a long time forbidden to the plebeians, but they were
also excluded from the public worship. In the great struggle for civil
equality which fills the history of Rome, religion is the great argument
with which the revolutionists are opposed. "How," say they, "could you
-become a prætor or consul? You have not the right to take the omens."
+become a prætor or consul? You have not the right to take the omens."
Above all, the people were very little attached to religion. Each
popular victory was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span> followed, as one may say, by an anti-clerical
re-action: on the contrary, the aristocracy remained always faithful to
@@ -515,10 +473,10 @@ Israel.</p>
<p>If one studies in fact the progress of the primitive Christian missions,
he remarks that they are all directed towards the West: in other words,
they take the Roman Empire as their theatre and limit. If one excepts
-some small portions of the vassal territory of the Arsacidæ, lying
+some small portions of the vassal territory of the Arsacidæ, lying
between the Euphrates and the Tigris, the empire of the Parthians
received no Christian missions during the first century. The Tigris was
-an eastern boundary which Christianity did not pass under the Sassanidæ.
+an eastern boundary which Christianity did not pass under the Sassanidæ.
Two great causes&mdash;the Mediterranean and the Roman Empire&mdash;determined
this capital fact.</p>
@@ -565,7 +523,7 @@ socialism and religion. At the close of the frightful wars which for
some centuries had rent the world, the empire had an era of prosperity
and of welfare such as it had never known: we may even be permitted to
add (without a paradox) liberty. Liberty of thought, at least, increased
-under this new <i>régime</i>. This liberty is often more prosperous under a
+under this new <i>régime</i>. This liberty is often more prosperous under a
king or a prince than under the jealous and narrow-minded plebeian. The
ancient republics did not have it. The Greeks did great things without
it, thanks to the incomparable power of their genius; but it must not be
@@ -604,7 +562,7 @@ been under the Roman authority, would have stifled it. It was the Roman
magistrates who hindered the Pharisees from killing Christianity. Some
lofty ideas of universal brotherhood&mdash;results, in the main, of
stoicism,&mdash;a sort of general sentiment of humanity, were the fruit of
-the least narrow <i>régime</i> and of the least exclusive education to which
+the least narrow <i>régime</i> and of the least exclusive education to which
the individual was submitted. The people dreamed of a new era and new
worlds. The public riches were great; and, in spite of the imperfection
of the economical doctrines of the time, there was general comfort.</p>
@@ -618,7 +576,7 @@ which goodness, conjugal fidelity, the domestic virtues, and uprightness
were commonly practised. Does there anywhere exist, in a world of honest
people in small villages, an ideal of family life more charming than
that which Plutarch has left us? What good fellowship! What sweetness of
-manners! What chaste and attractive simplicity! Chæronea was evidently
+manners! What chaste and attractive simplicity! Chæronea was evidently
not the only place where life was so pure and so innocent.</p>
<p>The customs, even outside of Rome, were still somewhat cruel, either
@@ -639,7 +597,7 @@ that he is capable of virtue, of fidelity, of devotion, and he gives
proofs of it. The prejudices concerning noble birth grow less. Some very
humane and just laws are made, even under the worst emperors. Tiberius
was a skilful financier: he founded upon an excellent basis an
-establishment of <i>crédit foncier</i>. Nero inaugurated in the system of
+establishment of <i>crédit foncier</i>. Nero inaugurated in the system of
taxation, until then unjust and barbarous, some improvements which shame
even our own time. Legislation was considerably advanced, while the
punishment of death was stupidly prodigal. Love of the poor, sympathy
@@ -673,14 +631,14 @@ the legends, the customs, the misfortunes, the hopes, the common
sorrows: the body is the soil, the race, the language, the mountains,
the rivers, the characteristic productions. Now, was a people ever more
wanting in all this than the first Christians? They did not cling to
-Judæa; after a few years they had forgotten Galilee; the glory of Greece
+Judæa; after a few years they had forgotten Galilee; the glory of Greece
and Rome was indifferent to them. The countries in which Christianity
was first established&mdash;Syria, Cyprus,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span> and Asia Minor&mdash;no longer
remembered the time when they were free. Greece and Rome, it is true,
still had a grand national sentiment. At Rome, patriotism survived in a
few families; in Greece, Christianity flourished only at Corinth,&mdash;a
city which, since its destruction by Mummius, and its reconstruction by
-Cæsar, was the resort of men of all races. The true Greek countries,
+Cæsar, was the resort of men of all races. The true Greek countries,
then, as to-day, very jealous, very much absorbed in the memories of
their past, gave little countenance to the new doctrines: they were
always lukewarm Christians. On the contrary, those gay, indolent,
@@ -707,7 +665,7 @@ expelled as a mortal poison to the State.</p>
<p>And here was one of the causes of the grandeur of the new religion.
Humanity is a multiform, changeable thing, tormented by conflicting
-desires. <i>La patrie</i> is grand, and the heroes of Marathon and Thermopylæ
+desires. <i>La patrie</i> is grand, and the heroes of Marathon and Thermopylæ
are saints. But one's country is not all here below: one is a man and a
son of God, before he is a Frenchman, or a German. The kingdom of God,
an eternal dream which is never destroyed in the heart of man, is a
@@ -820,7 +778,7 @@ been found in him.</p>
<p>We shall see, however, in our next conference, that the religious reign
of the future belonged neither to Serapis, nor to Mithra. The
-predestined religion grew imperceptibly in Judæa. This would have
+predestined religion grew imperceptibly in Judæa. This would have
greatly astonished the most sagacious Romans, if <a id="note_pg34">it</a> had been announced
to them. It would have been shocking to them in the highest degree. But
so often in history have improbable predictions become true, so often
@@ -918,7 +876,7 @@ family, and the spirit of duty.</p>
<p>The establishment of the Jews at Rome dated nearly sixty years before
Jesus Christ. They multiplied rapidly. Cicero represented it as an act
-of courage to dare to oppose them. Cæsar favored them, and found them
+of courage to dare to oppose them. Cæsar favored them, and found them
faithful. The people detested them, thought them malevolent, accused
them of forming a secret society whose members were advanced at any
price, to the detriment of others. But all did not approve these
@@ -1060,7 +1018,7 @@ pronounced on the quay of Rome the name of Jesus.</p>
<p>A capital trait, which it is important to note in any case, is, that the
Church of Rome was not, like the churches of Asia Minor, Macedonia, and
Greece, a foundation of the school of Paul. It was fundamentally
-Judæan-Christian, re-attaching itself directly to the Church of
+Judæan-Christian, re-attaching itself directly to the Church of
Jerusalem. Paul here will never be on his own ground: he will find in
this great church many weaknesses which he will treat with indulgence,
but which will wound his exalted idealism. Attached to circumcision and
@@ -1111,7 +1069,7 @@ con<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span>trary,
Jesus, since thus it might be supposed, that, outside the merits of
Jesus, such or such a work could serve for the justification of the
faithful. However strange it may appear, it is certain that the
-Judæan-Christians of Jerusalem, with James at their head, organized some
+Judæan-Christians of Jerusalem, with James at their head, organized some
active contra-missions in order to combat the effect of the missions of
Paul, and that the emissaries of these ardent conservatives followed in
some sort the lead of the apostle of the Gentiles. Peter belonged to the
@@ -1250,7 +1208,7 @@ It originated in that portion of the great Circus near to the Palatine
and C&oelig;lian Hills. In this quarter there were many little shops,
filled with inflammable matter, in which the flames spread with
prodigious rapidity. Thence it made the turn of the Palatine, ravaged
-the Velabra, the Forum, the Carinæ, ascended the hills, greatly injured
+the Velabra, the Forum, the Carinæ, ascended the hills, greatly injured
the Palatine, descended again to the valleys, devouring compact
quarters, and piercing tortuous streets, continuing six days and seven
nights. An enormous pile of houses which were torn down near the foot of
@@ -1278,7 +1236,7 @@ when it seemed about to die out.</p>
<p>These suspicions were confirmed by the fact, that, after the fire, Nero,
under pretext of removing the ruins at his own cost, in order to leave
-the place free to the proprietors, undertook to clear away the <i>débris</i>;
+the place free to the proprietors, undertook to clear away the <i>débris</i>;
and the people were not allowed to approach. This seemed worse when it
was seen that he drew from the ruins what belonged to the country, when
the new palace, that "golden house" which had been the plaything of his
@@ -1348,7 +1306,7 @@ had never been seen. Almost all those arrested were of the <i>humiliores</i>
(the poorest classes). The sentence of these unfortunates, when it
concerned high treason or sacrilege, was to be thrown to the beasts, or
to be burned alive in the amphitheatre. One of the most hideous traits
-of Roman manners was that of making a <i>fête</i>, a public amusement, of
+of Roman manners was that of making a <i>fête</i>, a public amusement, of
these tortures. The amphitheatres had become places of execution: the
tribunals furnished the victims. The condemned of the entire world were
forwarded to Rome for the provisionment of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span> circus and the amusement
@@ -1359,7 +1317,7 @@ consecrated to the combats of animals, presented an appearance hitherto
unknown. The condemned, covered with the tawny skins of beasts, were
hurried into the arena, where they were torn by dogs. Some were
crucified: others, reclothed with tunics steeped in oil, wax, or resin,
-were bound to posts, and reserved to light up the evening <i>fêtes</i>. When
+were bound to posts, and reserved to light up the evening <i>fêtes</i>. When
the day lowered, these living torches were ignited. For this spectacle,
Nero offered his magnificent gardens beyond the Tiber, which occupied
the site of the present Borgo, the Square, and the Church of St. Peter.
@@ -1377,7 +1335,7 @@ hideous torches, Nero, who had established the custom of evening
entertainments, showed himself in the arena, sometimes mingling with the
people in the dress of a charioteer, sometimes conducting his chariot
and seeking applause. Women and young girls were involved in these
-horrible games: a <i>fête</i> was made of the nameless indignities which they
+horrible games: a <i>fête</i> was made of the nameless indignities which they
suffered. Under Nero, the custom was established of compelling the
condemned to play in the amphitheatre some mythological part entailing
the death of the actor. These hideous operas, where mechanical science
@@ -1386,28 +1344,28 @@ was introduced into the arena, richly costumed as god or hero devoted to
death. He then represented by his suffering some tragic scene of the
fables consecrated by sculptors and poets. Sometimes it was the furious
Hercules burned on Mount &OElig;ta, tearing the waxed tunic from his skin;
-sometimes Orpheus torn in pieces by a bear; Dædalus thrown from heaven,
-and devoured by beasts; Pasiphæ struggling in the embraces of the bull;
+sometimes Orpheus torn in pieces by a bear; Dædalus thrown from heaven,
+and devoured by beasts; Pasiphæ struggling in the embraces of the bull;
Attys murdered. Sometimes there were horrible masquerades, in which the
men were dressed like priests of Saturn with a red cloak, the women as
priestesses of Ceres with fillets on the brow; finally, at other times,
some dramatic work of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span> time, in which the hero was really condemned
to death as Laureolus; or the representations were those of such tragic
-acts as that of Mucius Scævola. At the end of these hideous spectacles,
+acts as that of Mucius Scævola. At the end of these hideous spectacles,
Mercury, with a red-hot iron wand, touched each corpse to see if it
moved. Some masked valets, dressed like Pluto or Orcus, dragged away the
dead by the feet, killing with hammers all who still breathed. The
Christian ladies of the highest respectability even suffered these
-monstrosities. Some played the <i>rôle</i> of the Danaïdes, others that of
+monstrosities. Some played the <i>rôle</i> of the Danaïdes, others that of
Dirce. It is difficult to say what fable furnishes a more bloody picture
-than that of the Danaïdes. The suffering which all mythological
+than that of the Danaïdes. The suffering which all mythological
tradition attributes to these guilty women was not cruel enough to
-suffice for the pleasure of Nero and the <i>habitués</i> of his amphitheatre.
+suffice for the pleasure of Nero and the <i>habitués</i> of his amphitheatre.
Sometimes they were led out bearing urns, and received the fatal blow
from an actor figuring as Lynceus. Sometimes these unhappy beings went
through the series of the sufferings of Tartarus before the spectators,
and only died after hours of torments. The representations of Hell were
-quite <i>à la mode</i>. Some years previous (the year 41), some Egyptians and
+quite <i>à la mode</i>. Some years previous (the year 41), some Egyptians and
Nubians came to Rome, and made a great success in giving evening
performances, in which they displayed in order the horrors of the
subterranean world, conforming to the paintings of the burial-places of
@@ -1419,7 +1377,7 @@ Thebes, notably those of the tomb of Seti I.</p>
People know the colossal group now in the Museum of Naples, called the
<i>Toro Farnese</i>,&mdash;Amphion and Zethus attaching Dirce to the horns of an
unmanageable bull, which is to drag her over the rocks and briers of
-Cithæron. This mediocre Rhodian marble, brought to Rome in the time of
+Cithæron. This mediocre Rhodian marble, brought to Rome in the time of
Augustus, was the object of universal admiration. How could there be a
finer subject for the hideous art which the cruelty of the time had made
in vogue, and which consisted in reproducing the celebrated statues in
@@ -1431,7 +1389,7 @@ people. Some of the Christians immolated in this way were feeble in
body: their courage was superhuman. But the infamous crowd had eyes
alone for their torn bowels and lacerated bosoms.</p>
-<p>After the day when Jesus expired in Golgotha, the <i>fête</i> day in the
+<p>After the day when Jesus expired in Golgotha, the <i>fête</i> day in the
Gardens of Nero (it may be fixed about the first of August, 64) was the
most solemn in the history of Christianity. The solidity of any
construction is in proportion to the sum of virtue, of sacrifices, and
@@ -1439,7 +1397,7 @@ of devotion which has been laid down at its base. Only fanatics lay<span class="
foundations. Judaism endures still on account of the intense frenzy of
its zealots; Christianity, on account of its first witnesses. The orgy
of Nero was the grand baptism of blood which set Rome apart as the city
-of martyrs in order to play a distinct <i>rôle</i> in the history of
+of martyrs in order to play a distinct <i>rôle</i> in the history of
Christianity and to be the second Holy City. It was the taking
possession of the Vatican Hill by conquerors hitherto unknown there. The
odious, hair-brained man who governed the world did not perceive that he
@@ -1472,7 +1430,7 @@ shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not"&mdash;includes
some allusion to a peculiarity in the suffering of Peter. Paul, in his
quality of <i>honestior</i>, had his head cut off. It is also probable that
he was judged regularly, and that he was not included in the summary
-condemnations of the victims in the <i>fête</i> of Nero. All that, I repeat,
+condemnations of the victims in the <i>fête</i> of Nero. All that, I repeat,
is doubtful, and of little importance. True or not, the legend is
believed. At the commencement of the third century, near Rome, there
were already seen two monuments bearing the names of Peter and Paul. One
@@ -1500,16 +1458,16 @@ the less for our remembrance one of the spots most truly hallowed by
Christianity. The place which the seventeenth century surrounded with a
theatrical colonnade was a second Calvary; and, even supposing that
Peter was not crucified there, at least we cannot<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span> doubt the sufferings
-of the Danaïdes and the Dirces.</p>
+of the Danaïdes and the Dirces.</p>
<hr class="tb" />
<p>We shall show in our next assembly how tradition disposes of all these
doubts, and how the Church consummates reconciliation between Peter and
Paul, which death perhaps began. This was the price of success. The
-Judæan-Christianity of Peter and the Hellenism of Paul, apparently
+Judæan-Christianity of Peter and the Hellenism of Paul, apparently
irreconcilable, were equally necessary to the success of the future
-work. The Judæan-Christianity represented the conservative spirit
+work. The Judæan-Christianity represented the conservative spirit
without which nothing is solid; Hellenism, advance and progress, without
which nothing truly exists. Life is the result of a conflict between two
contrary forces. The absence of all revolutionary spirit is as fatal as
@@ -1546,7 +1504,7 @@ AUTHORITY.
<h4>I.</h4>
<p>Almost always the nations created to play a part in universal
-civilization, like Judæa, Greece, and the Italy of the renaissance,
+civilization, like Judæa, Greece, and the Italy of the renaissance,
exercise their full action upon the world, only after becoming victims
to their own grandeur. They must first die; then the world lives on
them, assimilates to itself that which they have created at the price of
@@ -1557,8 +1515,8 @@ humanity. The nation which works out social and religious problems in
its own bosom is almost always weak politically. Every country which
dreams of a kingdom of God, which lives for general ideas, which pursues
a work of universal interest, sacrifices through the same its individual
-destiny, enfeebles and destroys its <i>rôle</i> as a terrestrial<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span> country.
-One can never set himself on fire with impunity. Since Judæa made the
+destiny, enfeebles and destroys its <i>rôle</i> as a terrestrial<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span> country.
+One can never set himself on fire with impunity. Since Judæa made the
religious conquest of the world, it was necessary that she should
disappear as a nation. A revolution of extreme violence broke out in
this country in the year 66. During four years, this strange race, which
@@ -1588,7 +1546,7 @@ feudality, tolerant towards all provincial differences, almost analogous
to the Califat of Bagdad and to the Ottoman Empire, was the rule under
which the Jews found themselves most at ease. The Ptolemaic rule in the
third century before Jesus Christ seemed equally sympathetic to them:
-there were even no Seleucidæ. Antioch had become an active centre of
+there were even no Seleucidæ. Antioch had become an active centre of
Hellenic propagandism. Antiochus Epiphanus felt it necessary to set up
everywhere the image of Jupiter Olympus as the sign of his power. Then
broke out the first great Jewish revolt against profane civilization.
@@ -1596,7 +1554,7 @@ Israel had patiently supported the disappearance of its political
existence since Nebuchadnezzar. It retained no measure in which it saw a
danger to its religious institutions. A race, in general not military,
was seized with an access of heroism; without a regular army, without
-generals, without tactics, it conquered the Seleucidæ, maintained its
+generals, without tactics, it conquered the Seleucidæ, maintained its
revealed rights, and created a second period of autonomy. The Asmonean
royalty, nevertheless, was always distracted by profound interior vices.
It endured but one century. The destiny of the Jewish people was not to
@@ -1613,7 +1571,7 @@ rightly so, if we mean by it that the profound idea of the Semitic
religions, and of the empires which came out from them, is the kingdom
of God considered as the master of the world, and universal suzerain.
But theocracy with these nations was not synonymous with the domination
-of priests. The priest, properly speaking, plays an unimportant <i>rôle</i>
+of priests. The priest, properly speaking, plays an unimportant <i>rôle</i>
in the history of Judaism and Islamism. The power belongs to the
representative of God,&mdash;to him whom God inspires, to the prophet, to the
holy man, to him who has received his mission from Heaven, and who
@@ -1632,7 +1590,7 @@ cannot draw from its own bosom a principle of military power. Its
magistrates in the midst of other states, until modern liberalism
introduced the principle of the equality of all before the law.</p>
-<p>The Roman rule, established in Judæa sixty-three years before Christ by
+<p>The Roman rule, established in Judæa sixty-three years before Christ by
the armies of Pompey, seemed at first to realize some of the conditions
of Jewish life. Rome at this epoch did not pursue the policy of
assimilating the countries which she annexed to her vast empire. She
@@ -1774,7 +1732,7 @@ hate and exclusion once destroyed, the reconciliation of the opposing
parties in the Church of Jesus will become easy. Peter and Paul will be
brought into accord, and the terrible duality of the new-born
Christianity will cease to be a mortal sore. Lost in the depth of the
-interior of the Batanæa and the Hauran, the little group which attached
+interior of the Batanæa and the Hauran, the little group which attached
itself to James and Clopas becomes the Ebionite sect, and slowly dies.</p>
<p>These relatives of Jesus were pious, tranquil, mild, modest,
@@ -2008,7 +1966,7 @@ right of the other to be called Christian. James, the partisan of
absolute Judaism, was sacrificed, although he had been the true chief of
the circumcision. Peter,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span> who was much less objectionable to the
disciples of Paul, was preferred before him. James retained no devoted
-partisans outside of the <a id="note1_pg95">Judæan</a>-Christians.</p>
+partisans outside of the <a id="note1_pg95">Judæan</a>-Christians.</p>
<p>It is difficult to say who gained the most in this reconciliation. The
concessions came principally from the side of Paul: all Paul's disciples
@@ -2017,7 +1975,7 @@ the followers of Paul. But concessions usually come from the strong. In
truth, each day confirmed Paul's victory.</p>
<p>Each Gentile convert weighted the balance on his side. Outside of Syria,
-the <a id="note2_pg95">Judæan</a>-Christians were swallowed up by the wave of new converts. The
+the <a id="note2_pg95">Judæan</a>-Christians were swallowed up by the wave of new converts. The
churches of Paul prospered: they had good judgment, solidity of mind,
and some pecuniary resources which the others had not. The Ebionite
churches, on the contrary, grew poorer each day. The money of the
@@ -2048,14 +2006,14 @@ parties, and gave an opportunity for the most diverse combinations. The
tissue of tradition grew in this respect, by an instinctive travail,
almost as imperious as that which had presided at the construction of
the legend of Jesus. The end of the life of Peter and of Paul was
-commanded <i>à priori</i>. It was maintained that Christ had predicted the
+commanded <i>à priori</i>. It was maintained that Christ had predicted the
martyrdom of Peter, as he had announced the death of the sons of
Zebedee. The need was felt of associating in death<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span> the two persons who
had been reconciled by force. It was hoped, and perhaps this was not far
from right, that they died together, or at least as the consequence of
the same event. The places which were believed to have been sanctified
by this bloody drama were early fixed upon, and consecrated by
-<i>memoriæ</i>. In each case, whatever the people desired came in the end to
+<i>memoriæ</i>. In each case, whatever the people desired came in the end to
be true. Tradition makes history, retrospectively, as it ought to have
been, and as it never is. Not long ago the portraits of Victor Emmanuel
and Pius IX. hung side by side in every frequented place in Italy; and
@@ -2183,7 +2141,7 @@ hierarchy.</p>
<p>From the year 120 to 130 the Episcopate was elaborated in the Christian
Church, and the creation of the Episcopate was eminently a Roman work.
-All <i>ecclesiæ</i> imply a little hierarchy,&mdash;a bureau as it is called
+All <i>ecclesiæ</i> imply a little hierarchy,&mdash;a bureau as it is called
to-day,&mdash;a president, some assessors, and a small staff of men in its
service. Democratic associations are careful that these functions shall
be limited as far as possible as to power and duration; but from this
@@ -2380,7 +2338,7 @@ those of our own day, are nearly the same thing.</p>
<p>Thus the grand organisms which have become so essential a part of the
moral and political life of European nations were all created by those
-<i>naïve</i> and sincere Christians, whose faith has become inseparable from
+<i>naïve</i> and sincere Christians, whose faith has become inseparable from
the moral culture of humanity. The Episcopate under Marcus Aurelius was
fully ripe: the Papacy existed in germ. &OElig;cumenical councils were
impossible. The Christian Empire alone could authorize great assemblies;
@@ -2414,7 +2372,7 @@ second century by certain clear indications. The writing made at Rome
about 180, of which the Roman fragment known as the "<i>Canon de
Muratori</i>" makes a part, shows us Rome already regulating the canon of
the churches, making the passion of Peter the basis of Catholicity, and
-repulsing equally Montanism and Gnosticism.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span> Irenæus refutes all
+repulsing equally Montanism and Gnosticism.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span> Irenæus refutes all
heresies by the faith of this church, "the grandest, the most ancient,
the most illustrious, which possesses by continuous succession the true
tradition of the apostles Peter and Paul; to which, on account of its
@@ -2427,7 +2385,7 @@ other churches. The heretics condemned to the mines received a subsidy
from it: the common treasury was in a certain sense at Rome. The Sunday
collection, practised continually in the Roman Church, was probably
already established. A marvellous spirit of tradition animated this
-little community, in which Judæa, Greece, and Latium seemed to have
+little community, in which Judæa, Greece, and Latium seemed to have
confounded their very different gifts, in view of a prodigious future.
While the Jewish Monotheism furnished the immovable base of the new
formation, while Greece continued through Gnosticism its work of free
@@ -2505,7 +2463,7 @@ Universal Church, the most illustrious province, because it had not bent
its traditions before the Roman discipline. He published a decree by
virtue of which Asia was placed under the ban of the Christian
community. But the other bishops opposed this violent measure, and
-recalled Victor to charity. St. Irenæus, in particular, who, through the
+recalled Victor to charity. St. Irenæus, in particular, who, through the
necessity of the country in which he lived, had accepted for himself and
his churches in Gaul the Occidental custom, could not support the
thought that the mother-churches of Asia, to which he felt himself bound
@@ -2514,7 +2472,7 @@ Universal Church. He energetically persuaded Victor from the
excommunication of the churches which held to the traditions of their
fathers, and recalled to him the examples of his more tolerant
predecessors. This act of rare good sense prevented the schism of the
-Orient and the Occident from occurring in the second century. Irenæus
+Orient and the Occident from occurring in the second century. Irenæus
wrote to the bishops on all sides, and the question remained open to the
churches of Asia.</p>
@@ -2575,7 +2533,7 @@ identified with Babylon. Such were the authors of apocalypses and
sibylline writings. But the faithful of the great churches were of quite
a different way of thinking. In 70, the Church of Jerusalem, with a
sentiment more Christian than patriotic, left the revolutionary city,
-and sought peace beyond the Jordan. In the revolt of Barkokébas, the
+and sought peace beyond the Jordan. In the revolt of Barkokébas, the
division was still more pronounced. Not a single Christian was willing
to take part in this attempt of blind despair. St. Justin in his
Apologies never combats the principle of empire. He desired that the
@@ -2619,7 +2577,7 @@ where it hopes for favors is already very transparent. It is shown,
contrary to all truth, that Hadrian and Antonine sought to repair the
evil done by Nero and Domitian. Tertullian and his generation say the
same thing of Marcus Aurelius. Tertullian doubted, it is true, whether
-one could be at the same time a Cæsar and a Christian; but this
+one could be at the same time a Cæsar and a Christian; but this
incompatibility a century later struck no one, and Constantine proved
that Meliton of Sardis was a very sagacious man when he discerned so
well&mdash;a century and a half in advance, seeing through the proconsular
@@ -2680,7 +2638,7 @@ of realization. This is seen most plainly under those Syrian emperors
whom their quality of foreigners and base origin placed beyond
prejudices, and who, in spite of their vices, inaugurated a largeness of
ideas and a tolerance hitherto unknown. Those Syrian women of
-Emesa,&mdash;Julia Domna, Julia Mæsa, Julia Mammæa, Julia Soemia,&mdash;beautiful,
+Emesa,&mdash;Julia Domna, Julia Mæsa, Julia Mammæa, Julia Soemia,&mdash;beautiful,
intelligent, perfectly fearless, and held by no tradition or social law,
hesitated at nothing. They did what Roman women would never have dared.
They entered the Senate, deliberated there, and governed the empire
@@ -2710,7 +2668,7 @@ humbled. Constantine saw the interior strength of the Church. The
population of Asia Minor, Syria, Thrace, and Macedonia, in a word the
eastern part of the empire, was already more than half Christian. His
mother, who had been a servant in an inn at Nicomedia, dazzled his eyes
-with the picture of an Eastern empire having its centre near Nicæa or
+with the picture of an Eastern empire having its centre near Nicæa or
Nicomedia, whose nerves should be the bishops and those multitudes of
poor matriculates of the Church who controlled opinion in large cities.
Constantine made the empire Christian. From the Occidental point of
@@ -2855,7 +2813,7 @@ duped. No: liberty is the great dissolvent of all fanaticisms. In giving
back liberty to my enemy, who would suppress me if he had the power, I
shall really make him the worst gift. I oblige him to drink a strong
beverage which shall turn his head, while I shall keep my own. Science
-supports the strange <i>régime</i> of liberty: fanaticism and superstition do
+supports the strange <i>régime</i> of liberty: fanaticism and superstition do
not support it. We do more harm to dogmatism by treating it with an
implacable sweetness than by persecuting it. By this sweetness we even
inculcate the principle which destroys all dogmatism at its root, by
@@ -2919,7 +2877,7 @@ discourse to you, not one of those subtleties which divide, but one of
those themes, dear to the soul, which bring nearer, and reconcile. I
shall speak to you of that book resplendent with the divine spirit, that
manual of submissive life which the most godly of men has left us,&mdash;the
-Cæsar, Marcus Aurelius Antonine. It is the glory of sovereigns that the
+Cæsar, Marcus Aurelius Antonine. It is the glory of sovereigns that the
most irreproachable model of virtue may be found in their ranks, and
that the most beautiful lessons of patience and of self-control may come
from a condition which one naturally believes to be subject to all the
@@ -2930,7 +2888,7 @@ seductions of pleasure and of vanity.</p>
<p>The inheritance of wisdom with a throne is always rare: I find in
history but two striking examples of it,&mdash;in India, the succession of
-the three Mongol emperors, Bâber, Hoomâyoon, and Akbar; at Rome, at the
+the three Mongol emperors, Bâber, Hoomâyoon, and Akbar; at Rome, at the
head of the greatest empire that ever existed, the two admirable reigns
of Antonine the Pious and Marcus Aurelius. Of the last two, I consider
Antonine the greatest. His goodness did not lead him into faults: he was
@@ -2958,7 +2916,7 @@ endured it without submission were honored as heroes. The accession of
the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</a></span> Antonines was only the coming to power of the society of sages, of
whose just anger Tacitus has informed us,&mdash;a society of wise men formed
by the league of all those who had revolted against the despotism of the
-first Cæsars.</p>
+first Cæsars.</p>
<p>The salutary principle of adoption made the imperial court of the second
century a true cradle of virtue. The noble and learned Nerva, in
@@ -2977,12 +2935,12 @@ hastening the hour. Marcus Aurelius was made emperor so young, that the
idea of ruling had scarcely occurred to him, and had not for a moment
exercised its charm upon his mind.</p>
-<p>At eight years, when he was already <i>præsul</i> of the Salian priests,
+<p>At eight years, when he was already <i>præsul</i> of the Salian priests,
Hadrian remarked this sad child, and loved him for his good-nature, his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</a></span>
docility, and his incapability of falsehood. At eighteen years the
empire was assured to him. He awaited it patiently for twenty-two years.
The evening when Antonine, feeling himself about to die, after having
-given to the tribune the watchword, <i>Æquanimitas</i>, commanded the golden
+given to the tribune the watchword, <i>Æquanimitas</i>, commanded the golden
statue of Fortune, which was always in the apartment of the emperor, to
be borne into that of his adopted son, he experienced neither surprise
nor joy.</p>
@@ -3072,7 +3030,7 @@ military chieftain: it was a sort of grand civil magistracy, without
resembling a court in any way, or depriving the emperor of his private
character. Marcus Aurelius, in particular, was neither much nor little a
king in the true sense of the word. His fortune was immense, but all
-employed for good: his aversion for "the Cæsars," whom he considered as
+employed for good: his aversion for "the Cæsars," whom he considered as
a species of Sardanapali, magnificent, debauched, and cruel, burst out
at each instant. The civility of his manners was extreme. He gave to the
Senate all its ancient importance: when he was at Rome, he never missed
@@ -3271,7 +3229,7 @@ to have remained three or five years? That which is governed by laws is
unjust for no one. What is there, then, so sorrowful in being sent from
the city, not by a tyrant, not by an unjust judge, but by the same
nature which allowed thee to enter there? It is as if a comedian is
-discharged from the theatre by the same prætor who engaged him. But wilt
+discharged from the theatre by the same prætor who engaged him. But wilt
thou say, 'I have not played the five acts; I have played but three?'
Thou sayest well; but in life three acts suffice to complete the entire
piece.... Go, then, content, since he who dismisses thee is content."</p>
@@ -3305,7 +3263,7 @@ contrary to justice and right."</p>
<p>Ah! is it too much resignation, ladies and gentlemen? If it is veritably
thus, we have the right to complain. To say, that, if this world has not
its counterpart, the man who is sacrificed to truth or right ought to
-leave it content, and absolve the gods,&mdash;that is too <i>naïve</i>. No, he has
+leave it content, and absolve the gods,&mdash;that is too <i>naïve</i>. No, he has
a right to blaspheme them. For, in short, why has his credulity been
thus abused? Why should he have been endowed with deceitful instincts,
of which he has been the honest dupe? Wherefore is this premium given to
@@ -3435,7 +3393,7 @@ competition.</p>
people, although he had a twin-brother: he frequently took him in his
arms and renewed this act, which was a sort of proclamation. In 166
Lucius Verus demanded that the two sons of Marcus, Commodus and Annius
-Verus, should be made Cæsars. In 172 Commodus shared with his father the
+Verus, should be made Cæsars. In 172 Commodus shared with his father the
title of Germanicus. In 173, after the repression of the revolt of
Avidius, the Senate, in order to recognize in some way the family
disinterestedness which Marcus Aurelius had shown, demanded by
@@ -3566,7 +3524,7 @@ revolution, no change, no discovery, will have power to affect it.</p>
<p>page 54: "apochryphal" changed to "<a href="#note_pg54">apocryphal</a>"</p>
-<p>page 95: "Judean" changed to "<a href="#note1_pg95">Judæan</a>" and "<a href="#note2_pg95">Judæan</a>" (2 instances)</p>
+<p>page 95: "Judean" changed to "<a href="#note1_pg95">Judæan</a>" and "<a href="#note2_pg95">Judæan</a>" (2 instances)</p>
<p>page 109: "Mithracism" changed to "<a href="#note_pg109">Mithraicism</a>"</p>
@@ -3577,387 +3535,6 @@ revolution, no change, no discovery, will have power to affect it.</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-<pre>
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of English Conferences of Ernest Renan, by
-Ernest Renan
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLISH CONFERENCES ***
-
-***** This file should be named 42865-h.htm or 42865-h.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/4/2/8/6/42865/
-
-Produced by Charlene Taylor, Michael Seow and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
-http://gutenberg.org/license).
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
-http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
-809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
-business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
-information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
-page at http://pglaf.org
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit http://pglaf.org
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- http://www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-
-
-</pre>
-
+<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 42865 ***</div>
</body>
</html>
diff --git a/42865.zip b/42865.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index ea231a0..0000000
--- a/42865.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ