summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--39686-8.txt1029
-rw-r--r--39686-8.zipbin0 -> 21711 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h.zipbin0 -> 333618 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h/39686-h.htm1185
-rw-r--r--39686-h/images/i-p002.jpgbin0 -> 21487 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h/images/i-p005.jpgbin0 -> 49543 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h/images/i-p008.jpgbin0 -> 110241 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h/images/i-p012a.jpgbin0 -> 19919 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h/images/i-p012b.jpgbin0 -> 32528 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h/images/i-p013a.jpgbin0 -> 22725 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686-h/images/i-p013b.jpgbin0 -> 55034 bytes
-rw-r--r--39686.txt1029
-rw-r--r--39686.zipbin0 -> 21682 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
16 files changed, 3259 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/39686-8.txt b/39686-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b4f34f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1029 @@
+Project Gutenberg's North American Stone Implements, by Charles Rau
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: North American Stone Implements
+
+Author: Charles Rau
+
+Release Date: May 13, 2012 [EBook #39686]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by K Nordquist, JoAnn Greenwood, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS.
+
+ BY
+
+ CHARLES RAU.
+
+ REPRINTED FROM THE REPORT OF THE SMITHSONIAN
+ INSTITUTION FOR 1872.
+
+ WASHINGTON:
+ GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
+ 1873.
+
+
+
+
+NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS.
+
+BY CHARLES RAU.
+
+
+The division of the European stone age into a period of chipped stone,
+and a succeeding one of ground or polished stone, or, into the
+palaeolithic and neolithic periods, seems to be fully borne out by
+facts, and is likely to remain an uncontroverted basis for future
+investigation in Europe. In North America chipped as well as ground
+implements are abundant; yet they occur promiscuously, and thus far
+cannot be referred respectively to certain epochs in the development
+of the aborigines of the country. Archæological investigation in North
+America, however, is but of recent date, and a careful examination of
+our caves and drift-beds possibly may lead to results similar to those
+obtained in Europe. When in the latter part of the world man lived
+contemporaneously with the now extinct large pachydermatous and
+carnivorous animals, he used unground flint tools of rude workmanship,
+which were superseded in the later stages of the European stone age,
+comprising the neolithic period, by more finished articles of flint
+and other stone, many of which were brought into final shape by the
+processes of grinding and polishing. In North America stone implements
+likewise have been found associated with the osseous remains of
+extinct animals; yet these implements, it appears, differed in no wise
+from those in use among the aborigines at the period of their first
+intercourse with the whites.
+
+In the year 1839, the late Dr. Albert C. Koch discovered in the bottom
+of the Bourbeuse River, in Gasconade County, Missouri, the remains of
+a _Mastodon giganteus_ under very peculiar circumstances. The greater
+portion of the bones appeared more or less burned, and there was
+sufficient evidence that the fire had been kindled by human agency,
+and with the design of killing the huge creature, which had been found
+mired in the mud, and in an entirely helpless condition. The animal's
+fore and hind legs, untouched by the fire, were in a perpendicular
+position, with the toes attached to the feet, showing that the ground
+in which the animal had sunk, now a grayish-colored clay, was in a
+plastic condition when the occurrence took place. Those portions of
+the skeleton, however, which had been exposed above the surface of the
+clay, were partially consumed by the fire, and a layer of wood-ashes
+and charred bones, varying in thickness from two to six inches,
+indicated that the burning had been continued for some length of time.
+The fire appeared to have been most destructive around the head of the
+animal. Mingled with the ashes and bones was a large number of broken
+pieces of rock, which evidently had been carried to the spot from the
+bank of the Bourbeuse River to be hurled at the animal. But the
+burning and hurling of stones, it seems, did not satisfy the
+assailants of the mastodon; for Dr. Koch found among the ashes, bones,
+and rocks _several stone arrow-heads, a spear-head, and some stone
+axes_, which were taken out in the presence of a number of witnesses,
+consisting of the people of the neighborhood, who had been attracted
+by the novelty of the excavation. The layer of ashes and bones was
+covered by strata of alluvial deposits, consisting of clay, sand, and
+soil, from eight to nine feet thick, which form the bottom of the
+Bourbeuse River in general.
+
+About one year after this excavation, Dr. Koch found at another place,
+in Benton County, Missouri, in the bottom of the Pomme de Terre River,
+about ten miles above its junction with the Osage, _several stone
+arrow-heads_ mingled with the bones of a nearly entire skeleton of the
+Missourium. The two arrow-heads found with the bones "were in such a
+position as to furnish evidence still more conclusive, perhaps, than
+in the other case, of their being of equal, if not older date, than
+the bones themselves; for, besides that they were found in a layer of
+vegetable mold which was covered by twenty feet in thickness of
+alternate layers of sand, clay, and gravel, one of the arrow-heads lay
+underneath the thigh-bone of the skeleton, the bone actually resting
+in contact upon it, so that it could not have been brought thither
+after the deposit of the bone; a fact which I was careful thoroughly
+to investigate."[1]
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 1.]
+
+It affords me particular satisfaction to present in Fig. 1 a full-size
+drawing of the last-named arrow-head, which is still in the possession
+of Mrs. Elizabeth Koch, of Saint Louis, the widow of the discoverer.
+The drawing was made after a photograph, for which I am indebted to
+Mrs. Koch. It will be noticed that the point, one of the barbs, and a
+corner of the stem of this arrow-head--if it really was an arrow-head,
+and not the armature of a javelin or spear--are broken off; but there
+remains enough of it to make out its original shape, which is exactly
+that of similar weapons used by the aborigines in historical times.
+The specimen in question, which, as I presume, was found by Dr. Koch
+in its present mutilated shape, consists of a light-brown, somewhat
+mottled flint.[2]
+
+In referring to these discoveries of Dr. Koch, and some other
+indications of the high antiquity of man in America, Sir John Lubbock
+concludes that "there does not as yet appear to be any satisfactory
+proof that man co-existed in America with the Mammoth and
+Mastodon."[3] Yet, it may be expected, almost with certainty, that the
+results of future investigations in North America will fully
+corroborate Dr. Koch's discoveries, and vindicate the truthfulness of
+his statements. Indeed, some facts have come to light during the late
+geological survey of Illinois, which confirm, in a general way, the
+conclusions arrived at by the above-named explorer. According to this
+survey, the blue clays at the base of the drift contain fragments of
+wood and trunks of trees, but no fossil remains of animals; but the
+brown clays above, underlying the Loess, contain remains of the
+Mammoth, the Mastodon, and the Peccary; and bones of the Mastodon were
+found in a bed of "local drift," near Alton, underlying the Loess _in
+situ_ above, and also _in the same horizon, stone axes and flint
+spear-heads_, indicating the co-existence of the human race with the
+extinct mammalia of the Quaternary period.[4]
+
+It must not be overlooked that both Dr. Koch and the Illinois survey
+mention flint arrow and spear-heads as well as stone axes as being
+associated, directly or indirectly, with the remains of extinct animals.
+These stone axes undoubtedly were _ground_ implements; for, had they
+differed in any way from the ordinary Indian manufactures of the same
+class, the fact certainly would have been noticed by the observers. Thus
+far, then, we are not entitled to speak of a North American palaeolithic
+and neolithic period. In the new world, therefore, the human
+contemporary of the Mastodon and the Mammoth, it would seem, was more
+advanced in the manufacture of stone weapons than his savage brother of
+the European drift period, a circumstance which favors the view that the
+extinct large mammalia ceased to exist at a later epoch in America than
+in Europe. The remarks of Lieutenant-Colonel C. H. Smith on this point
+are of interest. "Over a considerable part of the eastern side of the
+great (American) mountain ridge," he says, "more particularly where
+ancient lakes have been converted into morasses, or have been filled by
+alluvials, organic remains of above thirty species of mammals, of the
+same orders and genera, in some cases of the same species, (as in
+Europe,) have been discovered, demonstrating their existence in a
+contemporary era with those of the old continent, and under similar
+circumstances. But their period of duration in the new world may have
+been prolonged to dates of a subsequent time, since the Pachyderms of
+the United States, as well as those of the Pampas of Brazil, are much
+more perfect; and, in many cases, possess characters ascribed to bones
+in a recent state. Alligators and crocodiles, moreover, continue to
+exist in latitudes where they endure a winter state of torpidity beneath
+ice, as an evidence that the great Saurians in that region have not yet
+entirely worked out their mission; whereas, on the old continent they
+had ceased to exist in high latitudes long before the extinction of the
+great Ungulata."[5]
+
+Flint implements of the European "drift type," however, are by no
+means scarce in North America, although they cannot (thus far) be
+referred to any particular period, but must be classed with the other
+chipped and ground implements in use among the North American
+aborigines during historical times.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 2.]
+
+In the first place I will mention certain leaf-shaped flint implements
+which have been found in mounds and on the surface, as well as in
+deposits below it. They are comparatively thin, of regular outline,
+and exhibit well-chipped edges all around the circumferences. On the
+whole, they are among the best North American flint articles which
+have fallen under my notice. The specimens found by Messrs. Squier and
+Davis in a mound of the inclosure called Mound City, on the Scioto
+River, some miles north of Chillicothe, Ohio, belong to this class.
+Most of them were broken, but a few were found entire, one of which is
+represented in half-size by Fig. 100 on page 211 of the "Ancient
+Monuments of the Mississippi Valley." This specimen measures four
+inches in length and about three inches across the broad rounded end.
+I have a still larger one, consisting of a reddish mottled flint,
+which was found on the surface in Jefferson County, Missouri. The
+annexed full-size drawing, Fig. 2, shows its outline. The edge on the
+right side is a little damaged by subsequent fractures, but for the
+sake of greater distinctness I have represented it as perfect. The
+finest leaf-shaped implements which I have had occasion to examine,
+are in the possession of Mr. M. Cowing, of Seneca Falls, New York. The
+owner told me he had more than a hundred of them, which were all
+derived from a locality in the State of New York, where they were
+accidentally discovered, forming a deposit under the surface. Mr.
+Cowing, who is constantly engaged in collecting and buying up Indian
+relics, refused to give me any information concerning the place and
+precise character of the deposit, basing his refusal on the ground
+that a few of these implements were still in the hands of individuals
+in the neighborhood, and that he would reveal nothing in relation to
+the deposit until he had obtained every specimen originally belonging
+to it. I am, therefore, unable to give any particulars, and must
+confine myself to the statement that the specimens shown to me present
+in general the outline of the original of Fig. 2, though they are a
+little smaller; and that they are thin, sharp-edged, and exquisitely
+wrought, and consist of a beautiful, variously-colored flint, which
+bears some resemblance to chalcedony.
+
+Concerning the use or uses of North American leaf-shaped articles, I
+am hardly prepared to give a definite opinion, though I think it
+probable that they served for purposes of cutting. They were certainly
+not intended for spear-heads, their shape being ill-adapted for that
+end; nor do I think that they were used as scrapers, as other more
+massive implements of a kindred character probably were, of which I
+shall speak hereafter.
+
+The aborigines were in the habit of burying articles of flint in the
+ground, and such deposits, sometimes quite large, have been discovered
+in various parts of the United States. These deposits consist of
+articles representing various types, among which I will mention the
+leaf-shaped implements in the possession of Mr. Cowing; the
+agricultural tools found at East Saint Louis, Illinois, of which I
+have given an account in the Smithsonian report for 1868; and the rude
+flint articles of an elongated oval shape, which were found about 1860
+on the bank of the Mississippi, between Carondelet and Saint Louis,
+Missouri, and doubtless belonged to a deposit. I have described them
+in the above-named Smithsonian report, (p. 405,) and have also given
+there a drawing of one of the specimens in my possession. This drawing
+has been reproduced by Mr. E. T. Stevens, on page 441 of his valuable
+work entitled "Flint Chips," (London, 1870,) with remarks tending to
+show that the specimen does not represent an unfinished implement, as
+I am inclined to believe, but a complete one. I must admit that my
+drawing is not a very good one. It gives the object a more definite
+character than it really possesses, the chipping appearing in the
+representation far less superficial than it is in the original, which,
+indeed, has such a shape that it could easily be reduced to a smaller
+size by blows aimed at its circumference. I have myself scaled off
+large flat flakes from similarly-shaped pieces of flint, using a small
+iron hammer and directing my blows against the edge, and have thus
+become convinced that the further working of objects like that in
+question could offer no serious difficulties to a practised
+flint-chipper. My collection, moreover, contains several smaller flint
+objects of similar shape, which are undoubtedly the rudiments of arrow
+and spear-heads, and I may add that I obtained a few from places where
+the manufacture of such weapons was carried on.
+
+Yet the most important deposit of flint implements resembling certain
+types of the European drift, is that discovered by Messrs. Squier and
+Davis during their researches in Ohio. They have described this
+interesting find in the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley,"
+and a _résumé_ of their account was given by me in the Smithsonian
+report for 1868, (p. 404.) The implements in question, I stated,
+occurred in one of the so-called sacrificial mounds of Clark's Work,
+on North Fork of Paint Creek, Ross County, Ohio. This flat, but very
+broad mound contained, instead of the hearth usually found in this
+class of earth-structures, an enormous number of flint discs, standing
+on their edges and arranged in two layers, one above the other, at the
+bottom of the mound. The whole extent of these layers has not been
+ascertained, but an excavation six feet long and four broad disclosed
+upward of six hundred of those discs, rudely blocked out of a superior
+kind of dark flint. I had occasion to examine the specimens from this
+mound, which were formerly in the collection of Dr. Davis, and have
+now in my collection a number that belonged to the same deposit. They
+are either roundish, oval, or heart-shaped, and of various sizes, but
+on an average six inches long, four inches wide, and from
+three-quarters to an inch in thickness. These flint discs are believed
+to have been buried as a religious offering, and the peculiar
+structure of the mound which inclosed them rather favors this opinion,
+while their enormous number, on the other hand, affords some
+probability to the view that they constituted a depot or magazine.
+Many of them are clumsy, and roughly chipped around their edges; and
+hence it has been suggested that they are no finished implements, but
+merely rudimentary forms, destined to receive more symmetry of outline
+by subsequent labor. Many of the discs under notice bear a striking
+resemblance to the flint "hatchets" discovered by Boucher de Perthes
+and Dr. Rigollot in the diluvial gravels of the valley of the Somme,
+in Northern France. The similarity in form, however, is the only
+analogy that can be claimed for the rude flint articles of both
+continents, considering that they occurred under totally different
+circumstances. The drift implements of Europe represent the most
+primitive attempts of man in the art of working stone, while the Ohio
+discs, if finished at all, are certainly very rough samples of the
+handicraft of a race that constructed earthworks of astonishing
+regularity and magnitude, and was already highly skilled in the art of
+chipping flint into various shapes.
+
+On page 214 of the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley," a
+group of the flint articles from Clark's Work is represented. The
+drawing exhibits pretty correctly the irregular outline and general
+rudeness of these specimens; yet Mr. Stevens states (Flint Chips, p.
+440) that "the representations are not at all satisfactory." The only
+fault, I think, that can be found with these drawings is their small
+scale, a fault which is very excusable, considering that at the period
+when Messrs. Squier and Davis published their work, (1848,) flint
+articles of such shape were no objects of particular attention; for
+just then the results of the researches of Boucher de Perthes were
+first laid before the scientific world, which, it is well known,
+ignored for a long time the significance of the rude flint tools
+discovered by the indefatigable and enthusiastic French savant in the
+diluvial gravel-beds of the Somme. It is true, however, that some of
+the flint discs of Clark's Work are wrought with more care than those
+represented in the "Ancient Monuments." This fact may be ascribed to a
+whim of the worker or workers, who gave some of the articles a greater
+degree of regularity by some additional blows. Mr. Stevens has only
+seen specimens of this better class, for such were those which Dr.
+Davis sold to the Blackmore Museum among his collection of Indian
+relics, and hence the author of "Flint Chips" seems to attribute to
+them a better general character than they really possess. I learn,
+however, that Mr. Blackmore, during a recent visit to Ohio, has
+succeeded in recovering a considerable number of the implements of
+Clark's Work, and thus an opportunity will be afforded again to
+investigate the true nature of these relics of a bygone people.
+
+The objects in question consist of the compact silicious stone of
+"Flint Ridge," in Ohio, a locality described on page 214 of the
+"Ancient Monuments."[6] A careful comparison has established this fact
+beyond any doubt. The flint or hornstone which occurs in that region,
+is a beautiful material of a dark color, resembling somewhat the real
+flint found in nodules in the cretaceous formations of Europe. It is
+occasionally marked with darker or lighter concentric stripes or
+bands, the centre of which is formed by a small nucleus of blue
+chalcedony; and this internal structure appears particularly distinct
+in specimens which, by exposure, have undergone a superficial change
+of color. The stone, in general, possesses peculiarities by which it
+can be recognized at once, even when met in a wrought state far from
+its original site. According to Mr. Squier, arrow-heads made of this
+hornstone have been found in Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, and
+Michigan. That they occur in Illinois, I can attest from personal
+experience.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 3.]
+
+A few years ago, when treating of the flint implements of Clark's
+Work, I was not prepared to express a definite opinion concerning the
+manner in which they were used. In the mean time, however, I have
+obtained additional information in relation to the class of implements
+under notice, which enables me, as I think, to point out the purposes
+for which those of Clark's Work, as well as similar ones from other
+localities, were designed. In the summer of 1869, some children, who
+were amusing themselves near the barn on the farm of Oliver H. Mullen,
+in the neighborhood of Fayetteville, Saint Clair County, Illinois, dug
+into the ground and discovered a deposit of fifty-two disc-shaped
+flint implements, which lay closely heaped together. Several of them
+came into my possession through the assistance of Dr. Patrick, of
+Belleville, in the same county. They consist, like those of Clark's
+Work, of the peculiar stone of Flint Ridge. This I noticed at first
+sight, and so did Messrs. Squier and Davis, to whom I showed them.
+They resemble, in general shape, the objects of Clark's Work, but are
+somewhat smaller and of perfectly symmetrical outline, having a
+well-chipped, though strong edge; in one word, they are highly
+finished implements, far superior to those of Clark's Work. In Fig. 3
+I give a full-size drawing of one of my specimens from Fayetteville,
+which is twenty millimeters thick in the middle. The slight
+irregularities observable in the circumference are owing to later
+accidental fractures. In this specimen, as in the others from the same
+find, the edge is produced by small, carefully-measured blows. The
+edges of my specimens from Fayetteville, moreover, exhibit traces of
+wear, being rubbed off to a small degree, and this circumstance, in
+connection with their shape, induces me to believe that they were used
+as _scraping_ or _smoothing implements_. The aborigines, it is well
+known, hollowed their canoes and wooden mortars with the assistance of
+fire, and the implements just described, were, as I presume, employed
+for removing the charred portions of the wood. They are well adapted
+to the grasp of the hand, and, indeed, of the most convenient form and
+size to serve in that operation. Probably they were likewise used in
+cleaning hides, and for other purposes. The tools of Fayetteville,
+however, are much more handy than those of Clark's Work.
+
+The fact that implements made of the hornstone of Flint Ridge are
+found in Illinois--a distance of about four hundred miles
+intervening--is of particular interest, as it shows that the material
+was quarried for exportation to remote parts of the country. It
+doubtless formed an article of traffic among the natives, like copper,
+sea-shells, and other natural productions which they applied to the
+exigencies of common life or used for personal adornment.
+
+Concerning North American flint implements of the European drift type
+in general, Mr. Stevens expresses himself thus: "The legitimate
+conclusion at which we may at present arrive, is that implements, in
+form resembling some of the European palaeolithic types, were made by
+the aborigines of America at a comparatively late period, and that the
+people usually termed the 'mound-builders,' were, probably, the makers
+of these implements." (p. 443.)
+
+There is no sufficient ground, I think, for attributing these
+implements exclusively to the mound-builders, considering that they
+occur on the surface, and in deposits below it, in regions where the
+people designated as the mound-builders are not supposed to have left
+their traces. In the States of New York and New Jersey, for instance,
+such articles repeatedly have been met. I will only refer to the
+leaf-shaped implements in possession of Mr. Cowing, which were found
+in New York, and are the finest specimens of that kind ever brought to
+my notice. That the people who erected the mounds made and used tools
+resembling the palaeolithic types of Europe, is proved by the
+occurrence of those tools in the mounds; but it follows by no means
+that they are to be considered as the sole makers of that class of
+implements. Supposing that the mound-builders really were a people
+superior in their attainments to the aborigines found in possession of
+the country by the whites, it is certainly very difficult to draw a
+line of demarcation between the manufactures of the ancient and those
+of the more recent indigenous inhabitants of North America. The
+mound-builders--to preserve the adopted term--certainly did not stow
+away all their articles of use and ornament in the mounds, but
+necessarily left a great many of them scattered over the surface,
+which became mingled with those of the succeeding occupants of the
+soil. Both the mound-builders and the later Indians lived in an age of
+stone, and as their wants were the same, they resorted to the same
+means to satisfy them. Their manufactures, therefore, must exhibit a
+considerable degree of similarity, and hence the great difficulty of
+separating them.
+
+Yet Mr. Stevens goes in this respect farther than any one before him.
+He is particularly orthodox in the matter of pipes. Those who have
+paid some attention to the antiquities of North America, are aware of
+the fact that Messrs. Squier and Davis found in the mounds of Ohio,
+especially in one mound near Chillicothe, a number of stone pipes of
+peculiar shape, which they have described in the "Ancient Monuments of
+the Mississippi Valley." In these pipes the bowl rises from the middle
+of a flat and somewhat curved base, one side of which communicates by
+means of a narrow perforation, usually one-sixth of an inch (about
+four millimeters) in diameter, with the hollow of the bowl, and
+represents the tube, or rather the mouth-piece of the pipe, while the
+other unperforated end forms the handle by which the smoker held the
+implement and approached it to his mouth. In the more elaborate
+specimens the bowl is formed, in some instances, in imitation of the
+human head, but generally of the body of an animal--mammal, bird, or
+reptile. These pipes, then, were smoked either without any stem, which
+seems probable, or by means of a very diminutive tube of some kind,
+the narrow bore of the base not allowing the insertion of anything
+like a massive stem. The authors of the "Ancient Monuments" called
+these pipes "mound-pipes," merely to designate that particular class
+of smoking utensils; it was not their intention to convey the idea
+that the mound-builders had been unacquainted with pipes into which
+stems were inserted. On the contrary, they distinctly assign a
+beautiful pipe of the latter kind, representing the body of a bird
+with a human head,[7] to the mound-builders, though this specimen was
+not found in a mound, but within an ancient inclosure twelve miles
+below the city of Chillicothe. Referring to this pipe, Mr. Stevens
+says: "Squier and Davis consider that this object is a relic of the
+mound-builders; but it does not appear that any pipe of similar form,
+or indeed _any_ pipe intended to be smoked by means of an inserted
+stem, has been found in any of the Ohio mounds." Upon inquiry I
+learned from Dr. Davis that mounds had been leveled by the plough
+within the inclosure where the pipe in question was found, which, he
+is convinced, belonged to the original contents of one of those
+obliterated mounds. In the Smithsonian report for 1868, I published
+(on page 399) the drawing of a pipe then in possession of Dr. Davis.
+Its shape is that of a barrel somewhat narrowing at the bottom, and
+its material an almost transparent rock-crystal. The two hollows, one
+for the reception of the smoking material, and the other for
+inserting a stem, meet under an obtuse angle. This pipe was taken from
+a mound near Bainbridge, Ross County, Ohio. Mr. Stevens suggests it
+had been associated with a secondary interment, (p. 524.) Dr. Davis,
+however, who is acquainted with the circumstances of its discovery,
+told me that it belonged, with various other objects, to the _primary_
+deposit of the mound. Thus it would seem that the mound-builders
+confined themselves by no means to the use of one particular class of
+pipes.
+
+Those who advocate a strict classification of North American relics
+according to earlier or later periods, should bear in mind that
+mound-building was still in use--if not in Ohio, at least in other
+parts of the present United States--when the first Europeans arrived,
+though the practice seems to have been abandoned soon after the
+colonization of the country by the whites. Yet, even in comparatively
+modern times, isolated cases of mound-building have been recorded,[8]
+which fact would indicate, perhaps, a lingering inclination to
+perpetuate an ancient, almost forgotten custom. Many of the earthworks
+in the Southern States doubtless were built by the race of Indians
+inhabiting the country when the Spaniards under De Soto made a vain
+attempt to take possession of that vast territory, then comprised
+under the name of Florida. For this we have Garcilasso de la Vega's
+often-quoted statement relating to the earth-structures of the
+Indians. The Floridians, we also know, erected at the same period
+mounds to mark the resting-places of their defunct chieftains. Le
+Moyne de Morgues has left in the "Brevis Narratio" a representation
+and description of a funeral of this kind. When the mound was heaped
+up, the mourners stuck arrows in the ground around its base, and
+placed the drinking vessel of the deceased, made of a large sea-shell,
+on the apex of the pile.[9] But even without such historical
+testimony, the continuance of mound-building might be deduced from the
+fact that articles of European origin are met, though rarely, among
+the primary deposits of mounds. The following interesting
+communication, for which I am indebted to Colonel Charles C. Jones,
+will serve to illustrate one case of mound-burial that can be referred
+with certainty to a period posterior to the European occupation of the
+country:
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 4.]
+
+"I have found in several mounds," says my informant, "glass beads and
+silver ornaments, and, in one instance, a part of a rifle-barrel,
+which were evidently buried with the dead. These, however, were
+secondary interments, the graves being upon the top, or sides, or near
+the base of the mound, and only a few feet deep. Never but in one case
+have I discovered any article of European manufacture interred with
+the dead in whose honor the mound was clearly erected. Upon opening a
+small earth-mound on the Georgia coast, a few miles below Savannah, I
+found a clay vessel, several flint arrow-heads, a hand-axe of stone,
+_and a portion of an old-fashioned sword_ deposited with the decayed
+bones of the skeleton. This tumulus was conical in shape, about seven
+feet high, and possessed a base diameter of some twenty feet. It
+contained only one skeleton, and that lay, with the articles I have
+enumerated, at the bottom of the mound, and on a level with the plain.
+The oaken hilt, most of the guard, and about seven inches of the blade
+of the sword still remained. The rest of the blade had perished from
+rust. Strange to say, the oak had best resisted the 'gnawing tooth of
+time.' This mound had never been opened or in any way disturbed,
+except by the winds and rains of the changing seasons. I have no doubt
+but that the interment was primary, and that all the articles
+enumerated were deposited with the dead before this mound-tomb was
+heaped above him. This, within the range of my observation, is an
+interesting and exceptional case. I am persuaded that mound-building,
+at least upon the Georgia coast, was abandoned by the natives very
+shortly after their primal contact with the whites."
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 5.]
+
+From mound-building I turn again to North American flint implements.
+Mr. Stevens refers in his work to the absence of flint scrapers in the
+series from the United States exhibited in the Blackmore Museum.
+Scrapers of the European spoon-shaped type, however, are not as scarce
+in the United States as Mr. Stevens seems to suppose. The collection
+of the Smithsonian Institution contains a number of them; and I found
+myself two characteristic specimens in the Kjökkenmödding at Keyport,
+New Jersey, described by me in the Smithsonian report for 1864. They
+lay upon the shell-covered ground, a short distance from each other,
+and were perhaps made by the same hand. In Fig. 4 I give a full-size
+drawing of one of my specimens, both of which consist of a brown kind
+of flint, such as probably would be called jasper by mineralogists.
+The figured specimen, it will be seen, possesses all the
+characteristics of a European scraper. Its lower surface is formed by
+a single curved fracture. The rounded head is somewhat turned toward
+the right, a feature likewise exhibited in the other specimen, which
+is a little larger, but not quite as typical as the original of Fig.
+4. As the peculiar curve of the broad part is observable in both
+specimens, it must be considered as having been produced
+intentionally. Indeed, I have among my flint scrapers from the
+pilework at Robenhausen one which is curved in the same direction. In
+fashioning their implements in this particular manner, the Indian and
+the ancient lake-man possibly had the same object in view.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 6.]
+
+There is, however, another somewhat different class of North American
+flint articles, which, as I believe, were employed by the aborigines
+for scraping and smoothing wood, horn, and other materials in which
+they worked, or perhaps, also, in the preparation of skins. They
+resemble stemmed arrow-heads, which, instead of being pointed,
+terminate in a semi-lunar, regularly chipped edge. It is probable that
+they were partly made from arrow-heads which had lost their points.
+Schoolcraft gives in Fig. 3, of Plate 18, in the first volume of his
+large work, the drawing of an object of this class, calling it "the
+blunt arrow or _Beekwuk_, (Algonkin,) which was fired at a mark." It
+is likely enough that these articles served in part the purpose
+assigned to them by Mr. Schoolcraft. Yet, I have in my collection
+several in which the rounded edge is worn and polished, while the
+remaining part retains its original sharpness of fracture, a
+circumstance that can only be ascribed to continued use, and therefore
+leads me to believe that they were employed in the manner already
+indicated. These implements hardly could be used without handles. Fig.
+5 represents, in natural size, one of my specimens, which was found on
+the surface near West Belleville, Saint Clair County, Illinois. The
+material is a yellowish-brown flint. The edge, it will be seen, is
+perfectly scraper-like. Inserted into a stout handle, this object
+would make an excellent scraper. The edge of this specimen is not
+polished, but it seems as if small particles of the edge had been
+scaled off by the pressure exerted in the use of the implement. In the
+original of the above full-size representation, Fig. 6, on the
+contrary, the curved edge is rubbed off to a considerable extent and
+perfectly polished, while the portion opposite the edge bears not the
+slightest trace of friction. This specimen, which consists of a
+whitish flint, was found in Saint Clair County, Illinois. In Fig. 7,
+lastly, I represent, in natural size, a fine large specimen, which I
+class among the implements under notice. I formerly supposed it to be
+a tool destined for cutting purposes, but the condition of the edge,
+which is rather blunt and hardly fit for cutting, afterward induced me
+to change my opinion. Originally, perhaps, one of those unusually
+large spear-heads, which are occasionally found, it may have been
+reduced subsequently, after having lost the point, to its present
+shape. Yet, it may never have possessed a form different from that
+which it now exhibits. This specimen is chipped from a fine reddish
+flint which contains encrinites. I obtained it from quarrymen near
+West Belleville, who found it in the earth while they were engaged in
+baring the rock for extending the quarry. In conclusion, I will state
+that, since writing the preceding pages, I received a number of stone
+implements from Muncy, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania, among which
+there are some large scrapers of the European type. Their material,
+however, is not flint, but either graywacke or a kind of tough slate.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 7.]
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Koch, in Transactions of the Academy of Science of Saint Louis,
+vol. i, (1860,) p. 61, &c.
+
+[2] I am well aware that the reality of Dr. Koch's discovery has been
+doubted by some, although it is difficult to perceive why he should
+have made those statements, if not true, at a time when the antiquity
+of man was not yet discussed, either in Europe or here, and he,
+therefore, could expect nothing but contradiction, public opinion
+being totally unprepared for such revelations. Not being a scientific
+palaeontologist, he certainly made some mistakes in putting together
+the bones of the animals exhumed by him; but these failings, in my
+opinion, have no bearing on his observations relative to the
+co-existence of man with extinct animals in North America. Only a
+short time ago some remarks tending to depreciate Dr. Koch's account
+were made by Dr. Schmidt, in an article on the antiquity of man in
+America, published in vol. v, of the _Archiv für Anthropologie_. I may
+state here that I was personally acquainted with Dr. Koch, whom I saw
+repeatedly at the meetings of the Academy of Science of Saint Louis.
+
+[3] Prehistoric Times, 1st ed., p. 236.
+
+[4] Geological Survey of Illinois, by A. H. Worthen, vol. i, (1866,)
+p. 38; quoted in Transactions of the Academy of Science of Saint
+Louis, vol. ii, (1868,) p. 567.
+
+[5] The Natural History of the Human Species, London, 1852, p. 89. The
+comparative freshness of the bones of extinct North American animals
+was noticed by Cuvier.
+
+[6] More particularly in Squier's "Aboriginal Monuments of New York,"
+Buffalo, 1851, p. 126.
+
+[7] Fig. 147 on p. 247 of the "Ancient Monuments;" Fig. 106 on p. 509
+of "Flint Chips."
+
+[8] Squier, Aboriginal Monuments of New York, p. 112, &c.
+
+[9] Le Moyne, in De Bry, vol. ii, Francoforti ad Moenum, 1591, pl. XL.
+
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Transcriber's Note:
+
+Obvious typographical errors repaired.
+
+Illustrations have been moved to paragraph breaks.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's North American Stone Implements, by Charles Rau
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 39686-8.txt or 39686-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/9/6/8/39686/
+
+Produced by K Nordquist, JoAnn Greenwood, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+ www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
+North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/39686-8.zip b/39686-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f72c32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h.zip b/39686-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dfe45d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h/39686-h.htm b/39686-h/39686-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d18847b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/39686-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,1185 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<!-- $Id: header.txt 236 2009-12-07 18:57:00Z vlsimpson $ -->
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of North American Stone Implements, by Charles Rau.
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+body {
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+small { font-size:60%; }
+
+p {
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+}
+
+hr {
+ width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ /* visibility: hidden; */
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+} /* page numbers */
+
+
+/* Vertical Spacing */
+
+.hugeskip {
+padding-top: 3em;
+}
+
+
+.transnote {background-color:#EEE; color: inherit; margin: 2em 10% 1em 10%;
+font-size: 100%; padding: 0.5em 1em 0.5em 1em; text-align: left;}
+
+.center {text-align: center;}
+
+.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+
+.caption {font-weight: bold;}
+
+/* Images */
+.figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.figleft {
+ float: left;
+ clear: left;
+ margin-left: 0;
+ margin-bottom: 1em;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ padding: 0;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.figright {
+ float: right;
+ clear: right;
+ margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-bottom:
+ 1em;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ margin-right: 0;
+ padding: 0;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+/* Footnotes */
+.footnotes {border: dashed 1px;}
+
+.footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
+
+.footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
+
+.fnanchor {
+ vertical-align: super;
+ font-size: .8em;
+ text-decoration:
+ none;
+}
+
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+Project Gutenberg's North American Stone Implements, by Charles Rau
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: North American Stone Implements
+
+Author: Charles Rau
+
+Release Date: May 13, 2012 [EBook #39686]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by K Nordquist, JoAnn Greenwood, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+<div class="hugeskip"></div>
+
+<h1>
+NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS.</h1>
+
+<div class="hugeskip"></div>
+
+<h2><small>BY</small><br /><br />
+
+CHARLES RAU.</h2>
+
+<div class="hugeskip"></div>
+
+<hr style="width: 35%;" />
+<div class="center">REPRINTED FROM THE REPORT OF THE SMITHSONIAN
+INSTITUTION FOR 1872.</div>
+<hr style="width: 35%;" />
+
+<div class="hugeskip"></div>
+<div class="center">WASHINGTON:<br />
+GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.<br />
+1873.
+</div>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2>NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS.</h2>
+
+<h3><span class="smcap">By Charles Rau.</span></h3>
+
+
+<p>The division of the European stone age into a period of chipped stone,
+and a succeeding one of ground or polished stone, or, into the palaeolithic
+and neolithic periods, seems to be fully borne out by facts, and is
+likely to remain an uncontroverted basis for future investigation in
+Europe. In North America chipped as well as ground implements are
+abundant; yet they occur promiscuously, and thus far cannot be referred
+respectively to certain epochs in the development of the aborigines
+of the country. Archæological investigation in North America,
+however, is but of recent date, and a careful examination of our caves
+and drift-beds possibly may lead to results similar to those obtained in
+Europe. When in the latter part of the world man lived contemporaneously
+with the now extinct large pachydermatous and carnivorous
+animals, he used unground flint tools of rude workmanship, which were
+superseded in the later stages of the European stone age, comprising
+the neolithic period, by more finished articles of flint and other stone,
+many of which were brought into final shape by the processes of grinding
+and polishing. In North America stone implements likewise have
+been found associated with the osseous remains of extinct animals; yet
+these implements, it appears, differed in no wise from those in use among
+the aborigines at the period of their first intercourse with the whites.</p>
+
+<p>In the year 1839, the late Dr. Albert C. Koch discovered in the bottom
+of the Bourbeuse River, in Gasconade County, Missouri, the remains
+of a <i lang="la" xml:lang="la">Mastodon giganteus</i> under very peculiar circumstances. The
+greater portion of the bones appeared more or less burned, and there
+was sufficient evidence that the fire had been kindled by human agency,
+and with the design of killing the huge creature, which had been found
+mired in the mud, and in an entirely helpless condition. The animal's
+fore and hind legs, untouched by the fire, were in a perpendicular position,
+with the toes attached to the feet, showing that the ground in
+which the animal had sunk, now a grayish-colored clay, was in a plastic
+condition when the occurrence took place. Those portions of the skeleton,
+however, which had been exposed above the surface of the clay,
+were partially consumed by the fire, and a layer of wood-ashes and
+charred bones, varying in thickness from two to six inches, indicated
+that the burning had been continued for some length of time. The fire
+appeared to have been most destructive around the head of the animal.
+Mingled with the ashes and bones was a large number of broken pieces
+of rock, which evidently had been carried to the spot from the bank of
+the Bourbeuse River to be hurled at the animal. But the burning and
+hurling of stones, it seems, did not satisfy the assailants of the mastodon;
+for Dr. Koch found among the ashes, bones, and rocks <i>several
+stone arrow-heads, a spear-head, and some stone axes</i>, which were taken
+out in the presence of a number of witnesses, consisting of the people of
+the neighborhood, who had been attracted by the novelty of the excavation.
+The layer of ashes and bones was covered by strata of alluvial
+deposits, consisting of clay, sand, and soil, from eight to nine feet thick,
+which form the bottom of the Bourbeuse River in general.</p>
+
+<p>About one year after this excavation, Dr. Koch found at another
+place, in Benton County, Missouri, in the bottom of the Pomme de Terre
+River, about ten miles above its junction with the Osage, <i>several stone
+arrow-heads</i> mingled with the bones of a nearly entire skeleton of the
+Missourium. The two arrow-heads found with the bones "were in such
+a position as to furnish evidence still more conclusive, perhaps, than in
+the other case, of their being of equal, if not older date, than the bones
+themselves; for, besides that they were found in a layer of vegetable
+mold which was covered by twenty feet in thickness of alternate layers
+of sand, clay, and gravel, one of the arrow-heads lay underneath the
+thigh-bone of the skeleton, the bone actually resting in contact upon it,
+so that it could not have been brought thither after the deposit of the
+bone; a fact which I was careful thoroughly to investigate."<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p>
+
+<div class="figleft" style="width: 235px;">
+<img src="images/i-p002.jpg" width="235" height="350" alt="Fig. 1." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 1.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>It affords me particular satisfaction to present in Fig. 1 a
+full-size drawing of the last-named arrow-head, which is still in
+the possession of Mrs. Elizabeth Koch, of Saint Louis, the widow
+of the discoverer. The drawing was made after a photograph, for
+which I am indebted to Mrs. Koch. It will be noticed that the
+point, one of the barbs, and a corner of the stem of this
+arrow-head&mdash;if it really was an arrow-head, and not the
+armature of a javelin or spear&mdash;are broken off; but there
+remains enough of it to make out its original shape, which is
+exactly that of similar weapons used by the aborigines in
+historical times. The specimen in question, which, as I presume,
+was found by Dr. Koch in its present mutilated shape, consists of
+a light-brown, somewhat mottled flint.<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a></p>
+
+<p>In referring to these discoveries of Dr. Koch, and some other indications
+of the high antiquity of man in America, Sir John Lubbock concludes
+that "there does not as yet appear to be any satisfactory proof
+that man co-existed in America with the Mammoth and Mastodon."<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a>
+Yet, it may be expected, almost with certainty, that the results of future
+investigations in North America will fully corroborate Dr. Koch's
+discoveries, and vindicate the truthfulness of his statements. Indeed,
+some facts have come to light during the late geological survey of Illinois,
+which confirm, in a general way, the conclusions arrived at by the
+above-named explorer. According to this survey, the blue clays at the
+base of the drift contain fragments of wood and trunks of trees, but
+no fossil remains of animals; but the brown clays above, underlying
+the Loess, contain remains of the Mammoth, the Mastodon, and the Peccary;
+and bones of the Mastodon were found in a bed of "local drift,"
+near Alton, underlying the Loess <i lang="la" xml:lang="la">in situ</i> above, and also <i>in the same horizon,
+stone axes and flint spear-heads</i>, indicating the co-existence of the
+human race with the extinct mammalia of the Quaternary period.<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a></p>
+
+<p>It must not be overlooked that both Dr. Koch and the Illinois survey
+mention flint arrow and spear-heads as well as stone axes as being associated,
+directly or indirectly, with the remains of extinct animals.
+These stone axes undoubtedly were <i>ground</i> implements; for, had they
+differed in any way from the ordinary Indian manufactures of the same
+class, the fact certainly would have been noticed by the observers.
+Thus far, then, we are not entitled to speak of a North American palaeolithic
+and neolithic period. In the new world, therefore, the human
+contemporary of the Mastodon and the Mammoth, it would seem, was
+more advanced in the manufacture of stone weapons than his savage
+brother of the European drift period, a circumstance which favors the
+view that the extinct large mammalia ceased to exist at a later epoch
+in America than in Europe. The remarks of Lieutenant-Colonel C. H.
+Smith on this point are of interest. "Over a considerable part of the
+eastern side of the great (American) mountain ridge," he says, "more
+particularly where ancient lakes have been converted into morasses, or
+have been filled by alluvials, organic remains of above thirty species of
+mammals, of the same orders and genera, in some cases of the same
+species, (as in Europe,) have been discovered, demonstrating their existence
+in a contemporary era with those of the old continent, and under
+similar circumstances. But their period of duration in the new world
+may have been prolonged to dates of a subsequent time, since the Pachyderms
+of the United States, as well as those of the Pampas of Brazil,
+are much more perfect; and, in many cases, possess characters ascribed
+to bones in a recent state. Alligators and crocodiles, moreover, continue
+to exist in latitudes where they endure a winter state of torpidity
+beneath ice, as an evidence that the great Saurians in that region have
+not yet entirely worked out their mission; whereas, on the old continent
+they had ceased to exist in high latitudes long before the extinction
+of the great Ungulata."<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a></p>
+
+<p>Flint implements of the European "drift type," however, are by no
+means scarce in North America, although they cannot (thus far) be
+referred to any particular period, but must be classed with the other
+chipped and ground implements in use among the North American aborigines
+during historical times.</p>
+
+<div class="figright" style="width: 366px;">
+<img src="images/i-p005.jpg" width="366" height="600" alt="Fig. 2." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 2.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>In the first place I will mention certain leaf-shaped flint implements
+which have been found in mounds and on the surface, as well as in deposits
+below it. They are comparatively thin, of regular outline, and
+exhibit well-chipped edges all around the circumferences. On the whole,
+they are among the best North American flint articles which have
+fallen under my notice. The specimens found by Messrs. Squier and
+Davis in a mound of the inclosure called Mound City, on the Scioto
+River, some miles north of Chillicothe, Ohio, belong to this class. Most
+of them were broken, but a few were found entire, one of which is represented
+in half-size by Fig. 100 on page 211 of the "Ancient Monuments
+of the Mississippi Valley." This specimen measures four inches in
+length and about three inches across the broad rounded end. I have a
+still larger one, consisting of a reddish mottled flint, which was found
+on the surface in Jefferson County, Missouri. The annexed full-size
+drawing, Fig. 2, shows its outline. The edge on the right side is a little
+damaged by subsequent fractures, but for the sake of greater distinctness
+I have represented it as perfect. The finest leaf-shaped implements
+which I have had occasion to examine, are in the possession of
+Mr. M. Cowing, of Seneca Falls, New York. The owner told me he had
+more than a hundred of them, which were all derived from a locality in
+the State of New York, where they were accidentally discovered, forming
+a deposit under the surface. Mr. Cowing, who is constantly engaged
+in collecting and buying up Indian relics, refused to give me any information
+concerning the place and precise character of the deposit,
+basing his refusal on the ground that a few of these implements were
+still in the hands of individuals in the neighborhood, and that he would
+reveal nothing in relation to the deposit until he had obtained every
+specimen originally belonging to it. I am, therefore, unable to give any
+particulars, and must confine myself to the statement that the specimens
+shown to me present in general the outline of the original of Fig. 2,
+though they are a little smaller; and that they are thin, sharp-edged,
+and exquisitely wrought, and consist of a beautiful, variously-colored
+flint, which bears some resemblance to chalcedony.</p>
+
+<p>Concerning the use or uses of North American leaf-shaped
+articles, I am hardly prepared to give a definite opinion, though
+I think it probable that they served for purposes of cutting.
+They were certainly not intended for spear-heads, their shape
+being ill-adapted for that end; nor do I think that they were
+used as scrapers, as other more massive implements of a kindred
+character probably were, of which I shall speak hereafter.</p>
+
+<p>The aborigines were in the habit of burying articles of flint in
+the ground, and such deposits, sometimes quite large, have been
+discovered in various parts of the United States. These deposits
+consist of articles representing various types, among which I
+will mention the leaf-shaped implements in the possession of Mr.
+Cowing; the agricultural tools found at East Saint Louis,
+Illinois, of which I have given an account in the Smithsonian
+report for 1868; and the rude flint articles of an elongated oval
+shape, which were found about 1860 on the bank of the
+Mississippi, between Carondelet and Saint Louis, Missouri, and
+doubtless belonged to a deposit. I have described them in the
+above-named Smithsonian report, (p. 405,) and have also given
+there a drawing of one of the specimens in my possession. This
+drawing has been reproduced by Mr. E. T. Stevens, on page 441 of
+his valuable work entitled "Flint Chips," (London, 1870,) with
+remarks tending to show that the specimen does not represent an
+unfinished implement, as I am inclined to believe, but a
+complete one. I must admit that my drawing is not a very good
+one. It gives the object a more definite character than it really
+possesses, the chipping appearing in the representation far less
+superficial than it is in the original, which, indeed, has such a
+shape that it could easily be reduced to a smaller size by blows
+aimed at its circumference. I have myself scaled off large flat
+flakes from similarly-shaped pieces of flint, using a small iron
+hammer and directing my blows against the edge, and have thus
+become convinced that the further working of objects like that in
+question could offer no serious difficulties to a practised
+flint-chipper. My collection, moreover, contains several smaller
+flint objects of similar shape, which are undoubtedly the
+rudiments of arrow and spear-heads, and I may add that I obtained
+a few from places where the manufacture of such weapons was
+carried on.</p>
+
+<p>Yet the most important deposit of flint implements resembling certain
+types of the European drift, is that discovered by Messrs. Squier
+and Davis during their researches in Ohio. They have described this
+interesting find in the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley,"
+and a <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">résumé</i> of their account was given by me in the Smithsonian report
+for 1868, (p. 404.) The implements in question, I stated, occurred
+in one of the so-called sacrificial mounds of Clark's Work, on North
+Fork of Paint Creek, Ross County, Ohio. This flat, but very broad
+mound contained, instead of the hearth usually found in this class of
+earth-structures, an enormous number of flint discs, standing on their
+edges and arranged in two layers, one above the other, at the bottom of
+the mound. The whole extent of these layers has not been ascertained,
+but an excavation six feet long and four broad disclosed upward of six
+hundred of those discs, rudely blocked out of a superior kind of dark
+flint. I had occasion to examine the specimens from this mound, which
+were formerly in the collection of Dr. Davis, and have now in my collection
+a number that belonged to the same deposit. They are either
+roundish, oval, or heart-shaped, and of various sizes, but on an average
+six inches long, four inches wide, and from three-quarters to an inch in
+thickness. These flint discs are believed to have been buried as a religious
+offering, and the peculiar structure of the mound which inclosed
+them rather favors this opinion, while their enormous number, on the
+other hand, affords some probability to the view that they constituted a
+depot or magazine. Many of them are clumsy, and roughly chipped
+around their edges; and hence it has been suggested that they are no
+finished implements, but merely rudimentary forms, destined to receive
+more symmetry of outline by subsequent labor. Many of the discs under
+notice bear a striking resemblance to the flint "hatchets" discovered
+by Boucher de Perthes and Dr. Rigollot in the diluvial gravels of the
+valley of the Somme, in Northern France. The similarity in form, however,
+is the only analogy that can be claimed for the rude flint articles
+of both continents, considering that they occurred under totally different
+circumstances. The drift implements of Europe represent the most
+primitive attempts of man in the art of working stone, while the Ohio
+discs, if finished at all, are certainly very rough samples of the handicraft
+of a race that constructed earthworks of astonishing regularity and
+magnitude, and was already highly skilled in the art of chipping flint
+into various shapes.</p>
+
+<p>On page 214 of the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley," a
+group of the flint articles from Clark's Work is represented. The drawing
+exhibits pretty correctly the irregular outline and general rudeness of
+these specimens; yet Mr. Stevens states (Flint Chips, p. 440) that "the
+representations are not at all satisfactory." The only fault, I think, that
+can be found with these drawings is their small scale, a fault which is very
+excusable, considering that at the period when Messrs. Squier and Davis
+published their work, (1848,) flint articles of such shape were no objects
+of particular attention; for just then the results of the researches of
+Boucher de Perthes were first laid before the scientific world, which, it
+is well known, ignored for a long time the significance of the rude flint
+tools discovered by the indefatigable and enthusiastic French savant in
+the diluvial gravel-beds of the Somme. It is true, however, that some
+of the flint discs of Clark's Work are wrought with more care than those
+represented in the "Ancient Monuments." This fact may be ascribed
+to a whim of the worker or workers, who gave some of the articles a
+greater degree of regularity by some additional blows. Mr. Stevens has
+only seen specimens of this better class, for such were those which Dr.
+Davis sold to the Blackmore Museum among his collection of Indian
+relics, and hence the author of "Flint Chips" seems to attribute to them
+a better general character than they really possess. I learn, however,
+that Mr. Blackmore, during a recent visit to Ohio, has succeeded in recovering
+a considerable number of the implements of Clark's Work, and
+thus an opportunity will be afforded again to investigate the true nature
+of these relics of a bygone people.</p>
+
+<p>The objects in question consist of the compact silicious stone of "Flint
+Ridge," in Ohio, a locality described on page 214 of the "Ancient Monuments."<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a>
+A careful comparison has established this fact beyond any
+doubt. The flint or hornstone which occurs in that region, is a beautiful
+material of a dark color, resembling somewhat the real flint found in
+nodules in the cretaceous formations of Europe. It is occasionally
+marked with darker or lighter concentric stripes or bands, the centre of
+which is formed by a small nucleus of blue chalcedony; and this internal
+structure appears particularly distinct in specimens which, by exposure,
+have undergone a superficial change of color. The stone, in
+general, possesses peculiarities by which it can be recognized at once,
+even when met in a wrought state far from its original site. According
+to Mr. Squier, arrow-heads made of this hornstone have been found in
+Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan. That they occur in Illinois,
+I can attest from personal experience.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 529px;">
+<img src="images/i-p008.jpg" width="529" height="600" alt="Fig 3." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 3.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>A few years ago, when treating of the flint implements of Clark's
+Work, I was not prepared to express a definite opinion concerning the
+manner in which they were used. In the mean time, however, I have obtained
+additional information in relation to the class of implements under
+notice, which enables me, as I think, to point out the purposes for which
+those of Clark's Work, as well as similar ones from other localities, were
+designed. In the summer of 1869, some children, who were amusing
+themselves near the barn on the farm of Oliver H. Mullen, in the neighborhood
+of Fayetteville, Saint Clair County, Illinois, dug into the ground
+and discovered a deposit of fifty-two disc-shaped flint implements, which
+lay closely heaped together. Several of them came into my possession
+through the assistance of Dr. Patrick, of Belleville, in the same county.
+They consist, like those of Clark's Work, of the peculiar stone of Flint
+Ridge. This I noticed at first sight, and so did Messrs. Squier and
+Davis, to whom I showed them. They resemble, in general shape, the
+objects of Clark's Work, but are somewhat smaller and of perfectly symmetrical
+outline, having a well-chipped, though strong edge; in one
+word, they are highly finished implements, far superior to those of
+Clark's Work. In Fig. 3 I give a full-size drawing of one of my specimens
+from Fayetteville, which is twenty millimeters thick in the middle.
+The slight irregularities observable in the circumference are owing to
+later accidental fractures. In this specimen, as in the others from the
+same find, the edge is produced by small, carefully-measured blows.
+The edges of my specimens from Fayetteville, moreover, exhibit traces of
+wear, being rubbed off to a small degree, and this circumstance, in connection
+with their shape, induces me to believe that they were used as
+<i>scraping</i> or <i>smoothing implements</i>. The aborigines, it is well known, hollowed
+their canoes and wooden mortars with the assistance of fire, and
+the implements just described, were, as I presume, employed for removing
+the charred portions of the wood. They are well adapted to the grasp
+of the hand, and, indeed, of the most convenient form and size to serve
+in that operation. Probably they were likewise used in cleaning hides,
+and for other purposes. The tools of Fayetteville, however, are much
+more handy than those of Clark's Work.</p>
+
+<p>The fact that implements made of the hornstone of Flint Ridge are
+found in Illinois&mdash;a distance of about four hundred miles intervening&mdash;is
+of particular interest, as it shows that the material was quarried for
+exportation to remote parts of the country. It doubtless formed an article
+of traffic among the natives, like copper, sea-shells, and other natural
+productions which they applied to the exigencies of common life
+or used for personal adornment.</p>
+
+<p>Concerning North American flint implements of the European drift
+type in general, Mr. Stevens expresses himself thus: "The legitimate
+conclusion at which we may at present arrive, is that implements, in form
+resembling some of the European palaeolithic types, were made by the
+aborigines of America at a comparatively late period, and that the people
+usually termed the 'mound-builders,' were, probably, the makers of
+these implements." (p. 443.)</p>
+
+<p>There is no sufficient ground, I think, for attributing these implements
+exclusively to the mound-builders, considering that they occur on the
+surface, and in deposits below it, in regions where the people designated
+as the mound-builders are not supposed to have left their traces. In
+the States of New York and New Jersey, for instance, such articles
+repeatedly have been met. I will only refer to the leaf-shaped implements
+in possession of Mr. Cowing, which were found in New York, and
+are the finest specimens of that kind ever brought to my notice. That
+the people who erected the mounds made and used tools resembling the
+palaeolithic types of Europe, is proved by the occurrence of those tools
+in the mounds; but it follows by no means that they are to be considered
+as the sole makers of that class of implements. Supposing that
+the mound-builders really were a people superior in their attainments
+to the aborigines found in possession of the country by the whites, it is
+certainly very difficult to draw a line of demarcation between the manufactures
+of the ancient and those of the more recent indigenous inhabitants
+of North America. The mound-builders&mdash;to preserve the adopted
+term&mdash;certainly did not stow away all their articles of use and ornament
+in the mounds, but necessarily left a great many of them scattered over
+the surface, which became mingled with those of the succeeding occupants
+of the soil. Both the mound-builders and the later Indians lived
+in an age of stone, and as their wants were the same, they resorted to
+the same means to satisfy them. Their manufactures, therefore, must
+exhibit a considerable degree of similarity, and hence the great difficulty
+of separating them.</p>
+
+<p>Yet Mr. Stevens goes in this respect farther than any one before him.
+He is particularly orthodox in the matter of pipes. Those who have
+paid some attention to the antiquities of North America, are aware of
+the fact that Messrs. Squier and Davis found in the mounds of Ohio,
+especially in one mound near Chillicothe, a number of stone pipes of
+peculiar shape, which they have described in the "Ancient Monuments
+of the Mississippi Valley." In these pipes the bowl rises from the middle
+of a flat and somewhat curved base, one side of which communicates
+by means of a narrow perforation, usually one-sixth of an inch (about
+four millimeters) in diameter, with the hollow of the bowl, and represents
+the tube, or rather the mouth-piece of the pipe, while the other
+unperforated end forms the handle by which the smoker held the implement
+and approached it to his mouth. In the more elaborate specimens
+the bowl is formed, in some instances, in imitation of the human
+head, but generally of the body of an animal&mdash;mammal, bird, or reptile.
+These pipes, then, were smoked either without any stem, which seems
+probable, or by means of a very diminutive tube of some kind, the narrow
+bore of the base not allowing the insertion of anything like a massive
+stem. The authors of the "Ancient Monuments" called these pipes
+"mound-pipes," merely to designate that particular class of smoking
+utensils; it was not their intention to convey the idea that the mound-builders
+had been unacquainted with pipes into which stems were inserted.
+On the contrary, they distinctly assign a beautiful pipe of the
+latter kind, representing the body of a bird with a human head,<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> to the
+mound-builders, though this specimen was not found in a mound, but
+within an ancient inclosure twelve miles below the city of Chillicothe.
+Referring to this pipe, Mr. Stevens says: "Squier and Davis consider
+that this object is a relic of the mound-builders; but it does not appear
+that any pipe of similar form, or indeed <i>any</i> pipe intended to be smoked
+by means of an inserted stem, has been found in any of the Ohio mounds."
+Upon inquiry I learned from Dr. Davis that mounds had been leveled
+by the plough within the inclosure where the pipe in question was found,
+which, he is convinced, belonged to the original contents of one of those
+obliterated mounds. In the Smithsonian report for 1868, I published
+(on page 399) the drawing of a pipe then in possession of Dr. Davis.
+Its shape is that of a barrel somewhat narrowing at the bottom, and its
+material an almost transparent rock-crystal. The two hollows, one for
+the reception of the smoking material, and the other for inserting a
+stem, meet under an obtuse angle. This pipe was taken from a mound
+near Bainbridge, Ross County, Ohio. Mr. Stevens suggests it had been
+associated with a secondary interment, (p. 524.) Dr. Davis, however,
+who is acquainted with the circumstances of its discovery, told me that
+it belonged, with various other objects, to the <i>primary</i> deposit of the
+mound. Thus it would seem that the mound-builders confined themselves
+by no means to the use of one particular class of pipes.</p>
+
+<p>Those who advocate a strict classification of North American relics
+according to earlier or later periods, should bear in mind that mound-building
+was still in use&mdash;if not in Ohio, at least in other parts of the
+present United States&mdash;when the first Europeans arrived, though the
+practice seems to have been abandoned soon after the colonization of
+the country by the whites. Yet, even in comparatively modern times,
+isolated cases of mound-building have been recorded,<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> which fact would
+indicate, perhaps, a lingering inclination to perpetuate an ancient,
+almost forgotten custom. Many of the earthworks in the Southern
+States doubtless were built by the race of Indians inhabiting the country
+when the Spaniards under De Soto made a vain attempt to take possession
+of that vast territory, then comprised under the name of Florida.
+For this we have Garcilasso de la Vega's often-quoted statement relating
+to the earth-structures of the Indians. The Floridians, we also
+know, erected at the same period mounds to mark the resting-places of
+their defunct chieftains. Le Moyne de Morgues has left in the "Brevis
+Narratio" a representation and description of a funeral of this kind.
+When the mound was heaped up, the mourners stuck arrows in the
+ground around its base, and placed the drinking vessel of the deceased,
+made of a large sea-shell, on the apex of the pile.<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> But even without
+such historical testimony, the continuance of mound-building might be
+deduced from the fact that articles of European origin are met, though
+rarely, among the primary deposits of mounds. The following interesting
+communication, for which I am indebted to Colonel Charles C.
+Jones, will serve to illustrate one case of mound-burial that can be referred
+with certainty to a period posterior to the European occupation
+of the country:</p>
+
+<div class="figleft" style="width: 169px;">
+<img src="images/i-p012a.jpg" width="169" height="350" alt="Fig. 4." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 4.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+<p>"I have found in several mounds," says my informant, "glass beads
+and silver ornaments, and, in one instance, a part of a
+rifle-barrel, which were evidently buried with the dead. These,
+however, were secondary interments, the graves being upon the
+top, or sides, or near the base of the mound, and only a few feet
+deep. Never but in one case have I discovered any article of
+European manufacture interred with the dead in whose honor the
+mound was clearly erected. Upon opening a small earth-mound on
+the Georgia coast, a few miles below Savannah, I found a clay
+vessel, several flint arrow-heads, a hand-axe of stone, <i>and a
+portion of an old-fashioned sword</i> deposited with the decayed
+bones of the skeleton. This tumulus was conical in shape, about
+seven feet high, and possessed a base diameter of some twenty
+feet. It contained only one skeleton, and that lay, with the
+articles I have enumerated, at the bottom of the mound, and on a
+level with the plain. The oaken hilt, most of the guard, and
+about seven inches of the blade of the sword still remained. The
+rest of the blade had perished from rust. Strange to say, the oak
+had best resisted the 'gnawing tooth of time.' This mound had
+never been opened or in any way disturbed, except by the winds
+and rains of the changing seasons. I have no doubt but that the
+interment was primary, and that all the articles enumerated were
+deposited with the dead before this mound-tomb was heaped above
+him. This, within the range of my observation, is an interesting
+and exceptional case. I am persuaded that mound-building, at
+least upon the Georgia coast, was abandoned by the natives very
+shortly after their primal contact with the whites."</p>
+
+<div class="figleft" style="width: 277px;">
+<img src="images/i-p012b.jpg" width="277" height="350" alt="Fig. 5" title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 5.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+<p>From mound-building I turn again to North American flint
+implements. Mr. Stevens refers in his work to the absence of
+flint scrapers in the series from the United States exhibited in
+the Blackmore Museum. Scrapers of the European spoon-shaped type,
+however, are not as scarce in the United States as Mr. Stevens
+seems to suppose. The collection of the Smithsonian Institution
+contains a number of them; and I found myself two characteristic
+specimens in the Kjökkenmödding at Keyport, New Jersey, described
+by me in the Smithsonian report for 1864. They lay upon the
+shell-covered ground, a short distance from each other, and were
+perhaps made by the same hand. In Fig. 4 I give a full-size
+drawing of one of my specimens, both of which consist of a brown
+kind of flint, such as probably would be called jasper by
+mineralogists. The figured specimen, it will be seen, possesses
+all the characteristics of a European scraper. Its lower surface
+is formed by a single curved fracture. The rounded head is
+somewhat turned toward the right, a feature likewise exhibited in
+the other specimen, which is a little larger, but not quite as
+typical as the original of Fig. 4. As the peculiar curve of the
+broad part is observable in both specimens, it must be considered
+as having been produced intentionally. Indeed, I have among my
+flint scrapers from the pilework at Robenhausen one which is
+curved in the same direction. In fashioning their implements in
+this particular manner, the Indian and the ancient lake-man
+possibly had the same object in view.</p>
+
+
+<div class="figright" style="width: 300px;">
+<img src="images/i-p013a.jpg" width="300" height="261" alt="Fig. 6." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 6.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>There is, however, another somewhat different class of North
+American flint articles, which, as I believe, were employed by
+the aborigines for scraping and smoothing wood, horn, and other
+materials in which they worked, or perhaps, also, in the
+preparation of skins. They resemble stemmed arrow-heads, which,
+instead of being pointed, terminate in a semi-lunar, regularly
+chipped edge. It is probable that they were partly made from
+arrow-heads which had lost their points. Schoolcraft gives in
+Fig. 3, of Plate 18, in the first volume of his large work, the
+drawing of an object of this class, calling it "the blunt arrow
+or <i>Beekwuk</i>, (Algonkin,) which was fired at a mark." It is
+likely enough that these articles served in part the purpose
+assigned to them by Mr. Schoolcraft. Yet, I have in my collection
+several in which the rounded edge is worn and polished, while the
+remaining part retains its original sharpness of fracture, a
+circumstance that can only be ascribed to continued use, and
+therefore leads me to believe that they were employed in the
+manner already indicated. These implements hardly could be used
+without handles. Fig. 5 represents, in natural size, one of my
+specimens, which was found on the surface near West Belleville,
+Saint Clair County, Illinois. The material is a yellowish-brown
+flint. The edge, it will be seen, is perfectly scraper-like.
+Inserted into a stout handle, this object would make an excellent
+scraper. The edge of this specimen is not polished, but it seems
+as if small particles of the edge had been scaled off by the
+pressure exerted in the use of the implement. In the original of
+the above full-size representation, Fig. 6, on the contrary, the
+curved edge is rubbed off to a considerable extent and perfectly
+polished, while the portion opposite the edge bears not the
+slightest trace of friction. This specimen, which consists of a
+whitish flint, was found in Saint Clair County, Illinois. In Fig.
+7, lastly, I represent, in natural size, a fine large specimen,
+which I class among the implements under notice. I formerly
+supposed it to be a tool destined for cutting purposes, but the
+condition of the edge, which is rather blunt and hardly fit for
+cutting, afterward induced me to change my opinion. Originally,
+perhaps, one of those unusually large spear-heads, which are
+occasionally found, it may have been reduced subsequently, after
+having lost the point, to its present shape. Yet, it may never
+have possessed a form different from that which it now exhibits.
+This specimen is chipped from a fine reddish flint which contains
+encrinites. I obtained it from quarrymen near West Belleville,
+who found it in the earth while they were engaged in baring the
+rock for extending the quarry. In conclusion, I will state that,
+since writing the preceding pages, I received a number of stone
+implements from Muncy, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania, among which
+there are some large scrapers of the European type. Their
+material, however, is not flint, but either graywacke or a kind
+of tough slate.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;">
+<img src="images/i-p013b.jpg" width="500" height="460" alt="Fig. 7." title="" />
+<span class="caption">Fig. 7.</span>
+<br /></div>
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Koch, in Transactions of the Academy of Science of Saint Louis, vol. i, (1860,) p. 61, &amp;c.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> I am well aware that the reality of Dr. Koch's discovery has been doubted by some,
+although it is difficult to perceive why he should have made those statements, if not
+true, at a time when the antiquity of man was not yet discussed, either in Europe or
+here, and he, therefore, could expect nothing but contradiction, public opinion being totally
+unprepared for such revelations. Not being a scientific palaeontologist, he certainly
+made some mistakes in putting together the bones of the animals exhumed by
+him; but these failings, in my opinion, have no bearing on his observations relative to
+the co-existence of man with extinct animals in North America. Only a short time
+ago some remarks tending to depreciate Dr. Koch's account were made by Dr. Schmidt,
+in an article on the antiquity of man in America, published in vol. v, of the <i lang="de" xml:lang="de">Archiv für
+Anthropologie</i>. I may state here that I was personally acquainted with Dr. Koch, whom
+I saw repeatedly at the meetings of the Academy of Science of Saint Louis.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Prehistoric Times, 1st ed., p. 236.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> Geological Survey of Illinois, by A. H. Worthen, vol. i, (1866,) p. 38; quoted in
+Transactions of the Academy of Science of Saint Louis, vol. ii, (1868,) p. 567.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> The Natural History of the Human Species, London, 1852, p. 89. The comparative
+freshness of the bones of extinct North American animals was noticed by Cuvier.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> More particularly in Squier's "Aboriginal Monuments of New York," Buffalo, 1851,
+p. 126.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> Fig. 147 on p. 247 of the "Ancient Monuments;" Fig. 106 on p. 509 of "Flint Chips."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Squier, Aboriginal Monuments of New York, p. 112, &amp;c.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Le Moyne, in De Bry, vol. ii, <span lang="la" xml:lang="la">Francoforti ad Moenum</span>, 1591, pl. XL.</p></div>
+
+</div>
+
+<div class="transnote"><h3>Transcriber's Note</h3>
+
+<p>Obvious typographical errors repaired.</p>
+<p>Illustrations have been moved to paragraph breaks.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's North American Stone Implements, by Charles Rau
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 39686-h.htm or 39686-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/9/6/8/39686/
+
+Produced by K Nordquist, JoAnn Greenwood, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+ www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
+North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/39686-h/images/i-p002.jpg b/39686-h/images/i-p002.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1316d3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/images/i-p002.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h/images/i-p005.jpg b/39686-h/images/i-p005.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2e25957
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/images/i-p005.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h/images/i-p008.jpg b/39686-h/images/i-p008.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f5f4a8a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/images/i-p008.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h/images/i-p012a.jpg b/39686-h/images/i-p012a.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..45e2468
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/images/i-p012a.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h/images/i-p012b.jpg b/39686-h/images/i-p012b.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eeb9852
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/images/i-p012b.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h/images/i-p013a.jpg b/39686-h/images/i-p013a.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4eddbc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/images/i-p013a.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686-h/images/i-p013b.jpg b/39686-h/images/i-p013b.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e04daf1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686-h/images/i-p013b.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39686.txt b/39686.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..685b201
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1029 @@
+Project Gutenberg's North American Stone Implements, by Charles Rau
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: North American Stone Implements
+
+Author: Charles Rau
+
+Release Date: May 13, 2012 [EBook #39686]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by K Nordquist, JoAnn Greenwood, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS.
+
+ BY
+
+ CHARLES RAU.
+
+ REPRINTED FROM THE REPORT OF THE SMITHSONIAN
+ INSTITUTION FOR 1872.
+
+ WASHINGTON:
+ GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
+ 1873.
+
+
+
+
+NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS.
+
+BY CHARLES RAU.
+
+
+The division of the European stone age into a period of chipped stone,
+and a succeeding one of ground or polished stone, or, into the
+palaeolithic and neolithic periods, seems to be fully borne out by
+facts, and is likely to remain an uncontroverted basis for future
+investigation in Europe. In North America chipped as well as ground
+implements are abundant; yet they occur promiscuously, and thus far
+cannot be referred respectively to certain epochs in the development
+of the aborigines of the country. Archaeological investigation in North
+America, however, is but of recent date, and a careful examination of
+our caves and drift-beds possibly may lead to results similar to those
+obtained in Europe. When in the latter part of the world man lived
+contemporaneously with the now extinct large pachydermatous and
+carnivorous animals, he used unground flint tools of rude workmanship,
+which were superseded in the later stages of the European stone age,
+comprising the neolithic period, by more finished articles of flint
+and other stone, many of which were brought into final shape by the
+processes of grinding and polishing. In North America stone implements
+likewise have been found associated with the osseous remains of
+extinct animals; yet these implements, it appears, differed in no wise
+from those in use among the aborigines at the period of their first
+intercourse with the whites.
+
+In the year 1839, the late Dr. Albert C. Koch discovered in the bottom
+of the Bourbeuse River, in Gasconade County, Missouri, the remains of
+a _Mastodon giganteus_ under very peculiar circumstances. The greater
+portion of the bones appeared more or less burned, and there was
+sufficient evidence that the fire had been kindled by human agency,
+and with the design of killing the huge creature, which had been found
+mired in the mud, and in an entirely helpless condition. The animal's
+fore and hind legs, untouched by the fire, were in a perpendicular
+position, with the toes attached to the feet, showing that the ground
+in which the animal had sunk, now a grayish-colored clay, was in a
+plastic condition when the occurrence took place. Those portions of
+the skeleton, however, which had been exposed above the surface of the
+clay, were partially consumed by the fire, and a layer of wood-ashes
+and charred bones, varying in thickness from two to six inches,
+indicated that the burning had been continued for some length of time.
+The fire appeared to have been most destructive around the head of the
+animal. Mingled with the ashes and bones was a large number of broken
+pieces of rock, which evidently had been carried to the spot from the
+bank of the Bourbeuse River to be hurled at the animal. But the
+burning and hurling of stones, it seems, did not satisfy the
+assailants of the mastodon; for Dr. Koch found among the ashes, bones,
+and rocks _several stone arrow-heads, a spear-head, and some stone
+axes_, which were taken out in the presence of a number of witnesses,
+consisting of the people of the neighborhood, who had been attracted
+by the novelty of the excavation. The layer of ashes and bones was
+covered by strata of alluvial deposits, consisting of clay, sand, and
+soil, from eight to nine feet thick, which form the bottom of the
+Bourbeuse River in general.
+
+About one year after this excavation, Dr. Koch found at another place,
+in Benton County, Missouri, in the bottom of the Pomme de Terre River,
+about ten miles above its junction with the Osage, _several stone
+arrow-heads_ mingled with the bones of a nearly entire skeleton of the
+Missourium. The two arrow-heads found with the bones "were in such a
+position as to furnish evidence still more conclusive, perhaps, than
+in the other case, of their being of equal, if not older date, than
+the bones themselves; for, besides that they were found in a layer of
+vegetable mold which was covered by twenty feet in thickness of
+alternate layers of sand, clay, and gravel, one of the arrow-heads lay
+underneath the thigh-bone of the skeleton, the bone actually resting
+in contact upon it, so that it could not have been brought thither
+after the deposit of the bone; a fact which I was careful thoroughly
+to investigate."[1]
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 1.]
+
+It affords me particular satisfaction to present in Fig. 1 a full-size
+drawing of the last-named arrow-head, which is still in the possession
+of Mrs. Elizabeth Koch, of Saint Louis, the widow of the discoverer.
+The drawing was made after a photograph, for which I am indebted to
+Mrs. Koch. It will be noticed that the point, one of the barbs, and a
+corner of the stem of this arrow-head--if it really was an arrow-head,
+and not the armature of a javelin or spear--are broken off; but there
+remains enough of it to make out its original shape, which is exactly
+that of similar weapons used by the aborigines in historical times.
+The specimen in question, which, as I presume, was found by Dr. Koch
+in its present mutilated shape, consists of a light-brown, somewhat
+mottled flint.[2]
+
+In referring to these discoveries of Dr. Koch, and some other
+indications of the high antiquity of man in America, Sir John Lubbock
+concludes that "there does not as yet appear to be any satisfactory
+proof that man co-existed in America with the Mammoth and
+Mastodon."[3] Yet, it may be expected, almost with certainty, that the
+results of future investigations in North America will fully
+corroborate Dr. Koch's discoveries, and vindicate the truthfulness of
+his statements. Indeed, some facts have come to light during the late
+geological survey of Illinois, which confirm, in a general way, the
+conclusions arrived at by the above-named explorer. According to this
+survey, the blue clays at the base of the drift contain fragments of
+wood and trunks of trees, but no fossil remains of animals; but the
+brown clays above, underlying the Loess, contain remains of the
+Mammoth, the Mastodon, and the Peccary; and bones of the Mastodon were
+found in a bed of "local drift," near Alton, underlying the Loess _in
+situ_ above, and also _in the same horizon, stone axes and flint
+spear-heads_, indicating the co-existence of the human race with the
+extinct mammalia of the Quaternary period.[4]
+
+It must not be overlooked that both Dr. Koch and the Illinois survey
+mention flint arrow and spear-heads as well as stone axes as being
+associated, directly or indirectly, with the remains of extinct animals.
+These stone axes undoubtedly were _ground_ implements; for, had they
+differed in any way from the ordinary Indian manufactures of the same
+class, the fact certainly would have been noticed by the observers. Thus
+far, then, we are not entitled to speak of a North American palaeolithic
+and neolithic period. In the new world, therefore, the human
+contemporary of the Mastodon and the Mammoth, it would seem, was more
+advanced in the manufacture of stone weapons than his savage brother of
+the European drift period, a circumstance which favors the view that the
+extinct large mammalia ceased to exist at a later epoch in America than
+in Europe. The remarks of Lieutenant-Colonel C. H. Smith on this point
+are of interest. "Over a considerable part of the eastern side of the
+great (American) mountain ridge," he says, "more particularly where
+ancient lakes have been converted into morasses, or have been filled by
+alluvials, organic remains of above thirty species of mammals, of the
+same orders and genera, in some cases of the same species, (as in
+Europe,) have been discovered, demonstrating their existence in a
+contemporary era with those of the old continent, and under similar
+circumstances. But their period of duration in the new world may have
+been prolonged to dates of a subsequent time, since the Pachyderms of
+the United States, as well as those of the Pampas of Brazil, are much
+more perfect; and, in many cases, possess characters ascribed to bones
+in a recent state. Alligators and crocodiles, moreover, continue to
+exist in latitudes where they endure a winter state of torpidity beneath
+ice, as an evidence that the great Saurians in that region have not yet
+entirely worked out their mission; whereas, on the old continent they
+had ceased to exist in high latitudes long before the extinction of the
+great Ungulata."[5]
+
+Flint implements of the European "drift type," however, are by no
+means scarce in North America, although they cannot (thus far) be
+referred to any particular period, but must be classed with the other
+chipped and ground implements in use among the North American
+aborigines during historical times.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 2.]
+
+In the first place I will mention certain leaf-shaped flint implements
+which have been found in mounds and on the surface, as well as in
+deposits below it. They are comparatively thin, of regular outline,
+and exhibit well-chipped edges all around the circumferences. On the
+whole, they are among the best North American flint articles which
+have fallen under my notice. The specimens found by Messrs. Squier and
+Davis in a mound of the inclosure called Mound City, on the Scioto
+River, some miles north of Chillicothe, Ohio, belong to this class.
+Most of them were broken, but a few were found entire, one of which is
+represented in half-size by Fig. 100 on page 211 of the "Ancient
+Monuments of the Mississippi Valley." This specimen measures four
+inches in length and about three inches across the broad rounded end.
+I have a still larger one, consisting of a reddish mottled flint,
+which was found on the surface in Jefferson County, Missouri. The
+annexed full-size drawing, Fig. 2, shows its outline. The edge on the
+right side is a little damaged by subsequent fractures, but for the
+sake of greater distinctness I have represented it as perfect. The
+finest leaf-shaped implements which I have had occasion to examine,
+are in the possession of Mr. M. Cowing, of Seneca Falls, New York. The
+owner told me he had more than a hundred of them, which were all
+derived from a locality in the State of New York, where they were
+accidentally discovered, forming a deposit under the surface. Mr.
+Cowing, who is constantly engaged in collecting and buying up Indian
+relics, refused to give me any information concerning the place and
+precise character of the deposit, basing his refusal on the ground
+that a few of these implements were still in the hands of individuals
+in the neighborhood, and that he would reveal nothing in relation to
+the deposit until he had obtained every specimen originally belonging
+to it. I am, therefore, unable to give any particulars, and must
+confine myself to the statement that the specimens shown to me present
+in general the outline of the original of Fig. 2, though they are a
+little smaller; and that they are thin, sharp-edged, and exquisitely
+wrought, and consist of a beautiful, variously-colored flint, which
+bears some resemblance to chalcedony.
+
+Concerning the use or uses of North American leaf-shaped articles, I
+am hardly prepared to give a definite opinion, though I think it
+probable that they served for purposes of cutting. They were certainly
+not intended for spear-heads, their shape being ill-adapted for that
+end; nor do I think that they were used as scrapers, as other more
+massive implements of a kindred character probably were, of which I
+shall speak hereafter.
+
+The aborigines were in the habit of burying articles of flint in the
+ground, and such deposits, sometimes quite large, have been discovered
+in various parts of the United States. These deposits consist of
+articles representing various types, among which I will mention the
+leaf-shaped implements in the possession of Mr. Cowing; the
+agricultural tools found at East Saint Louis, Illinois, of which I
+have given an account in the Smithsonian report for 1868; and the rude
+flint articles of an elongated oval shape, which were found about 1860
+on the bank of the Mississippi, between Carondelet and Saint Louis,
+Missouri, and doubtless belonged to a deposit. I have described them
+in the above-named Smithsonian report, (p. 405,) and have also given
+there a drawing of one of the specimens in my possession. This drawing
+has been reproduced by Mr. E. T. Stevens, on page 441 of his valuable
+work entitled "Flint Chips," (London, 1870,) with remarks tending to
+show that the specimen does not represent an unfinished implement, as
+I am inclined to believe, but a complete one. I must admit that my
+drawing is not a very good one. It gives the object a more definite
+character than it really possesses, the chipping appearing in the
+representation far less superficial than it is in the original, which,
+indeed, has such a shape that it could easily be reduced to a smaller
+size by blows aimed at its circumference. I have myself scaled off
+large flat flakes from similarly-shaped pieces of flint, using a small
+iron hammer and directing my blows against the edge, and have thus
+become convinced that the further working of objects like that in
+question could offer no serious difficulties to a practised
+flint-chipper. My collection, moreover, contains several smaller flint
+objects of similar shape, which are undoubtedly the rudiments of arrow
+and spear-heads, and I may add that I obtained a few from places where
+the manufacture of such weapons was carried on.
+
+Yet the most important deposit of flint implements resembling certain
+types of the European drift, is that discovered by Messrs. Squier and
+Davis during their researches in Ohio. They have described this
+interesting find in the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley,"
+and a _resume_ of their account was given by me in the Smithsonian
+report for 1868, (p. 404.) The implements in question, I stated,
+occurred in one of the so-called sacrificial mounds of Clark's Work,
+on North Fork of Paint Creek, Ross County, Ohio. This flat, but very
+broad mound contained, instead of the hearth usually found in this
+class of earth-structures, an enormous number of flint discs, standing
+on their edges and arranged in two layers, one above the other, at the
+bottom of the mound. The whole extent of these layers has not been
+ascertained, but an excavation six feet long and four broad disclosed
+upward of six hundred of those discs, rudely blocked out of a superior
+kind of dark flint. I had occasion to examine the specimens from this
+mound, which were formerly in the collection of Dr. Davis, and have
+now in my collection a number that belonged to the same deposit. They
+are either roundish, oval, or heart-shaped, and of various sizes, but
+on an average six inches long, four inches wide, and from
+three-quarters to an inch in thickness. These flint discs are believed
+to have been buried as a religious offering, and the peculiar
+structure of the mound which inclosed them rather favors this opinion,
+while their enormous number, on the other hand, affords some
+probability to the view that they constituted a depot or magazine.
+Many of them are clumsy, and roughly chipped around their edges; and
+hence it has been suggested that they are no finished implements, but
+merely rudimentary forms, destined to receive more symmetry of outline
+by subsequent labor. Many of the discs under notice bear a striking
+resemblance to the flint "hatchets" discovered by Boucher de Perthes
+and Dr. Rigollot in the diluvial gravels of the valley of the Somme,
+in Northern France. The similarity in form, however, is the only
+analogy that can be claimed for the rude flint articles of both
+continents, considering that they occurred under totally different
+circumstances. The drift implements of Europe represent the most
+primitive attempts of man in the art of working stone, while the Ohio
+discs, if finished at all, are certainly very rough samples of the
+handicraft of a race that constructed earthworks of astonishing
+regularity and magnitude, and was already highly skilled in the art of
+chipping flint into various shapes.
+
+On page 214 of the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley," a
+group of the flint articles from Clark's Work is represented. The
+drawing exhibits pretty correctly the irregular outline and general
+rudeness of these specimens; yet Mr. Stevens states (Flint Chips, p.
+440) that "the representations are not at all satisfactory." The only
+fault, I think, that can be found with these drawings is their small
+scale, a fault which is very excusable, considering that at the period
+when Messrs. Squier and Davis published their work, (1848,) flint
+articles of such shape were no objects of particular attention; for
+just then the results of the researches of Boucher de Perthes were
+first laid before the scientific world, which, it is well known,
+ignored for a long time the significance of the rude flint tools
+discovered by the indefatigable and enthusiastic French savant in the
+diluvial gravel-beds of the Somme. It is true, however, that some of
+the flint discs of Clark's Work are wrought with more care than those
+represented in the "Ancient Monuments." This fact may be ascribed to a
+whim of the worker or workers, who gave some of the articles a greater
+degree of regularity by some additional blows. Mr. Stevens has only
+seen specimens of this better class, for such were those which Dr.
+Davis sold to the Blackmore Museum among his collection of Indian
+relics, and hence the author of "Flint Chips" seems to attribute to
+them a better general character than they really possess. I learn,
+however, that Mr. Blackmore, during a recent visit to Ohio, has
+succeeded in recovering a considerable number of the implements of
+Clark's Work, and thus an opportunity will be afforded again to
+investigate the true nature of these relics of a bygone people.
+
+The objects in question consist of the compact silicious stone of
+"Flint Ridge," in Ohio, a locality described on page 214 of the
+"Ancient Monuments."[6] A careful comparison has established this fact
+beyond any doubt. The flint or hornstone which occurs in that region,
+is a beautiful material of a dark color, resembling somewhat the real
+flint found in nodules in the cretaceous formations of Europe. It is
+occasionally marked with darker or lighter concentric stripes or
+bands, the centre of which is formed by a small nucleus of blue
+chalcedony; and this internal structure appears particularly distinct
+in specimens which, by exposure, have undergone a superficial change
+of color. The stone, in general, possesses peculiarities by which it
+can be recognized at once, even when met in a wrought state far from
+its original site. According to Mr. Squier, arrow-heads made of this
+hornstone have been found in Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, and
+Michigan. That they occur in Illinois, I can attest from personal
+experience.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 3.]
+
+A few years ago, when treating of the flint implements of Clark's
+Work, I was not prepared to express a definite opinion concerning the
+manner in which they were used. In the mean time, however, I have
+obtained additional information in relation to the class of implements
+under notice, which enables me, as I think, to point out the purposes
+for which those of Clark's Work, as well as similar ones from other
+localities, were designed. In the summer of 1869, some children, who
+were amusing themselves near the barn on the farm of Oliver H. Mullen,
+in the neighborhood of Fayetteville, Saint Clair County, Illinois, dug
+into the ground and discovered a deposit of fifty-two disc-shaped
+flint implements, which lay closely heaped together. Several of them
+came into my possession through the assistance of Dr. Patrick, of
+Belleville, in the same county. They consist, like those of Clark's
+Work, of the peculiar stone of Flint Ridge. This I noticed at first
+sight, and so did Messrs. Squier and Davis, to whom I showed them.
+They resemble, in general shape, the objects of Clark's Work, but are
+somewhat smaller and of perfectly symmetrical outline, having a
+well-chipped, though strong edge; in one word, they are highly
+finished implements, far superior to those of Clark's Work. In Fig. 3
+I give a full-size drawing of one of my specimens from Fayetteville,
+which is twenty millimeters thick in the middle. The slight
+irregularities observable in the circumference are owing to later
+accidental fractures. In this specimen, as in the others from the same
+find, the edge is produced by small, carefully-measured blows. The
+edges of my specimens from Fayetteville, moreover, exhibit traces of
+wear, being rubbed off to a small degree, and this circumstance, in
+connection with their shape, induces me to believe that they were used
+as _scraping_ or _smoothing implements_. The aborigines, it is well
+known, hollowed their canoes and wooden mortars with the assistance of
+fire, and the implements just described, were, as I presume, employed
+for removing the charred portions of the wood. They are well adapted
+to the grasp of the hand, and, indeed, of the most convenient form and
+size to serve in that operation. Probably they were likewise used in
+cleaning hides, and for other purposes. The tools of Fayetteville,
+however, are much more handy than those of Clark's Work.
+
+The fact that implements made of the hornstone of Flint Ridge are
+found in Illinois--a distance of about four hundred miles
+intervening--is of particular interest, as it shows that the material
+was quarried for exportation to remote parts of the country. It
+doubtless formed an article of traffic among the natives, like copper,
+sea-shells, and other natural productions which they applied to the
+exigencies of common life or used for personal adornment.
+
+Concerning North American flint implements of the European drift type
+in general, Mr. Stevens expresses himself thus: "The legitimate
+conclusion at which we may at present arrive, is that implements, in
+form resembling some of the European palaeolithic types, were made by
+the aborigines of America at a comparatively late period, and that the
+people usually termed the 'mound-builders,' were, probably, the makers
+of these implements." (p. 443.)
+
+There is no sufficient ground, I think, for attributing these
+implements exclusively to the mound-builders, considering that they
+occur on the surface, and in deposits below it, in regions where the
+people designated as the mound-builders are not supposed to have left
+their traces. In the States of New York and New Jersey, for instance,
+such articles repeatedly have been met. I will only refer to the
+leaf-shaped implements in possession of Mr. Cowing, which were found
+in New York, and are the finest specimens of that kind ever brought to
+my notice. That the people who erected the mounds made and used tools
+resembling the palaeolithic types of Europe, is proved by the
+occurrence of those tools in the mounds; but it follows by no means
+that they are to be considered as the sole makers of that class of
+implements. Supposing that the mound-builders really were a people
+superior in their attainments to the aborigines found in possession of
+the country by the whites, it is certainly very difficult to draw a
+line of demarcation between the manufactures of the ancient and those
+of the more recent indigenous inhabitants of North America. The
+mound-builders--to preserve the adopted term--certainly did not stow
+away all their articles of use and ornament in the mounds, but
+necessarily left a great many of them scattered over the surface,
+which became mingled with those of the succeeding occupants of the
+soil. Both the mound-builders and the later Indians lived in an age of
+stone, and as their wants were the same, they resorted to the same
+means to satisfy them. Their manufactures, therefore, must exhibit a
+considerable degree of similarity, and hence the great difficulty of
+separating them.
+
+Yet Mr. Stevens goes in this respect farther than any one before him.
+He is particularly orthodox in the matter of pipes. Those who have
+paid some attention to the antiquities of North America, are aware of
+the fact that Messrs. Squier and Davis found in the mounds of Ohio,
+especially in one mound near Chillicothe, a number of stone pipes of
+peculiar shape, which they have described in the "Ancient Monuments of
+the Mississippi Valley." In these pipes the bowl rises from the middle
+of a flat and somewhat curved base, one side of which communicates by
+means of a narrow perforation, usually one-sixth of an inch (about
+four millimeters) in diameter, with the hollow of the bowl, and
+represents the tube, or rather the mouth-piece of the pipe, while the
+other unperforated end forms the handle by which the smoker held the
+implement and approached it to his mouth. In the more elaborate
+specimens the bowl is formed, in some instances, in imitation of the
+human head, but generally of the body of an animal--mammal, bird, or
+reptile. These pipes, then, were smoked either without any stem, which
+seems probable, or by means of a very diminutive tube of some kind,
+the narrow bore of the base not allowing the insertion of anything
+like a massive stem. The authors of the "Ancient Monuments" called
+these pipes "mound-pipes," merely to designate that particular class
+of smoking utensils; it was not their intention to convey the idea
+that the mound-builders had been unacquainted with pipes into which
+stems were inserted. On the contrary, they distinctly assign a
+beautiful pipe of the latter kind, representing the body of a bird
+with a human head,[7] to the mound-builders, though this specimen was
+not found in a mound, but within an ancient inclosure twelve miles
+below the city of Chillicothe. Referring to this pipe, Mr. Stevens
+says: "Squier and Davis consider that this object is a relic of the
+mound-builders; but it does not appear that any pipe of similar form,
+or indeed _any_ pipe intended to be smoked by means of an inserted
+stem, has been found in any of the Ohio mounds." Upon inquiry I
+learned from Dr. Davis that mounds had been leveled by the plough
+within the inclosure where the pipe in question was found, which, he
+is convinced, belonged to the original contents of one of those
+obliterated mounds. In the Smithsonian report for 1868, I published
+(on page 399) the drawing of a pipe then in possession of Dr. Davis.
+Its shape is that of a barrel somewhat narrowing at the bottom, and
+its material an almost transparent rock-crystal. The two hollows, one
+for the reception of the smoking material, and the other for
+inserting a stem, meet under an obtuse angle. This pipe was taken from
+a mound near Bainbridge, Ross County, Ohio. Mr. Stevens suggests it
+had been associated with a secondary interment, (p. 524.) Dr. Davis,
+however, who is acquainted with the circumstances of its discovery,
+told me that it belonged, with various other objects, to the _primary_
+deposit of the mound. Thus it would seem that the mound-builders
+confined themselves by no means to the use of one particular class of
+pipes.
+
+Those who advocate a strict classification of North American relics
+according to earlier or later periods, should bear in mind that
+mound-building was still in use--if not in Ohio, at least in other
+parts of the present United States--when the first Europeans arrived,
+though the practice seems to have been abandoned soon after the
+colonization of the country by the whites. Yet, even in comparatively
+modern times, isolated cases of mound-building have been recorded,[8]
+which fact would indicate, perhaps, a lingering inclination to
+perpetuate an ancient, almost forgotten custom. Many of the earthworks
+in the Southern States doubtless were built by the race of Indians
+inhabiting the country when the Spaniards under De Soto made a vain
+attempt to take possession of that vast territory, then comprised
+under the name of Florida. For this we have Garcilasso de la Vega's
+often-quoted statement relating to the earth-structures of the
+Indians. The Floridians, we also know, erected at the same period
+mounds to mark the resting-places of their defunct chieftains. Le
+Moyne de Morgues has left in the "Brevis Narratio" a representation
+and description of a funeral of this kind. When the mound was heaped
+up, the mourners stuck arrows in the ground around its base, and
+placed the drinking vessel of the deceased, made of a large sea-shell,
+on the apex of the pile.[9] But even without such historical
+testimony, the continuance of mound-building might be deduced from the
+fact that articles of European origin are met, though rarely, among
+the primary deposits of mounds. The following interesting
+communication, for which I am indebted to Colonel Charles C. Jones,
+will serve to illustrate one case of mound-burial that can be referred
+with certainty to a period posterior to the European occupation of the
+country:
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 4.]
+
+"I have found in several mounds," says my informant, "glass beads and
+silver ornaments, and, in one instance, a part of a rifle-barrel,
+which were evidently buried with the dead. These, however, were
+secondary interments, the graves being upon the top, or sides, or near
+the base of the mound, and only a few feet deep. Never but in one case
+have I discovered any article of European manufacture interred with
+the dead in whose honor the mound was clearly erected. Upon opening a
+small earth-mound on the Georgia coast, a few miles below Savannah, I
+found a clay vessel, several flint arrow-heads, a hand-axe of stone,
+_and a portion of an old-fashioned sword_ deposited with the decayed
+bones of the skeleton. This tumulus was conical in shape, about seven
+feet high, and possessed a base diameter of some twenty feet. It
+contained only one skeleton, and that lay, with the articles I have
+enumerated, at the bottom of the mound, and on a level with the plain.
+The oaken hilt, most of the guard, and about seven inches of the blade
+of the sword still remained. The rest of the blade had perished from
+rust. Strange to say, the oak had best resisted the 'gnawing tooth of
+time.' This mound had never been opened or in any way disturbed,
+except by the winds and rains of the changing seasons. I have no doubt
+but that the interment was primary, and that all the articles
+enumerated were deposited with the dead before this mound-tomb was
+heaped above him. This, within the range of my observation, is an
+interesting and exceptional case. I am persuaded that mound-building,
+at least upon the Georgia coast, was abandoned by the natives very
+shortly after their primal contact with the whites."
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 5.]
+
+From mound-building I turn again to North American flint implements.
+Mr. Stevens refers in his work to the absence of flint scrapers in the
+series from the United States exhibited in the Blackmore Museum.
+Scrapers of the European spoon-shaped type, however, are not as scarce
+in the United States as Mr. Stevens seems to suppose. The collection
+of the Smithsonian Institution contains a number of them; and I found
+myself two characteristic specimens in the Kjoekkenmoedding at Keyport,
+New Jersey, described by me in the Smithsonian report for 1864. They
+lay upon the shell-covered ground, a short distance from each other,
+and were perhaps made by the same hand. In Fig. 4 I give a full-size
+drawing of one of my specimens, both of which consist of a brown kind
+of flint, such as probably would be called jasper by mineralogists.
+The figured specimen, it will be seen, possesses all the
+characteristics of a European scraper. Its lower surface is formed by
+a single curved fracture. The rounded head is somewhat turned toward
+the right, a feature likewise exhibited in the other specimen, which
+is a little larger, but not quite as typical as the original of Fig.
+4. As the peculiar curve of the broad part is observable in both
+specimens, it must be considered as having been produced
+intentionally. Indeed, I have among my flint scrapers from the
+pilework at Robenhausen one which is curved in the same direction. In
+fashioning their implements in this particular manner, the Indian and
+the ancient lake-man possibly had the same object in view.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 6.]
+
+There is, however, another somewhat different class of North American
+flint articles, which, as I believe, were employed by the aborigines
+for scraping and smoothing wood, horn, and other materials in which
+they worked, or perhaps, also, in the preparation of skins. They
+resemble stemmed arrow-heads, which, instead of being pointed,
+terminate in a semi-lunar, regularly chipped edge. It is probable that
+they were partly made from arrow-heads which had lost their points.
+Schoolcraft gives in Fig. 3, of Plate 18, in the first volume of his
+large work, the drawing of an object of this class, calling it "the
+blunt arrow or _Beekwuk_, (Algonkin,) which was fired at a mark." It
+is likely enough that these articles served in part the purpose
+assigned to them by Mr. Schoolcraft. Yet, I have in my collection
+several in which the rounded edge is worn and polished, while the
+remaining part retains its original sharpness of fracture, a
+circumstance that can only be ascribed to continued use, and therefore
+leads me to believe that they were employed in the manner already
+indicated. These implements hardly could be used without handles. Fig.
+5 represents, in natural size, one of my specimens, which was found on
+the surface near West Belleville, Saint Clair County, Illinois. The
+material is a yellowish-brown flint. The edge, it will be seen, is
+perfectly scraper-like. Inserted into a stout handle, this object
+would make an excellent scraper. The edge of this specimen is not
+polished, but it seems as if small particles of the edge had been
+scaled off by the pressure exerted in the use of the implement. In the
+original of the above full-size representation, Fig. 6, on the
+contrary, the curved edge is rubbed off to a considerable extent and
+perfectly polished, while the portion opposite the edge bears not the
+slightest trace of friction. This specimen, which consists of a
+whitish flint, was found in Saint Clair County, Illinois. In Fig. 7,
+lastly, I represent, in natural size, a fine large specimen, which I
+class among the implements under notice. I formerly supposed it to be
+a tool destined for cutting purposes, but the condition of the edge,
+which is rather blunt and hardly fit for cutting, afterward induced me
+to change my opinion. Originally, perhaps, one of those unusually
+large spear-heads, which are occasionally found, it may have been
+reduced subsequently, after having lost the point, to its present
+shape. Yet, it may never have possessed a form different from that
+which it now exhibits. This specimen is chipped from a fine reddish
+flint which contains encrinites. I obtained it from quarrymen near
+West Belleville, who found it in the earth while they were engaged in
+baring the rock for extending the quarry. In conclusion, I will state
+that, since writing the preceding pages, I received a number of stone
+implements from Muncy, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania, among which
+there are some large scrapers of the European type. Their material,
+however, is not flint, but either graywacke or a kind of tough slate.
+
+[Illustration: Fig. 7.]
+
+FOOTNOTES:
+
+[1] Koch, in Transactions of the Academy of Science of Saint Louis,
+vol. i, (1860,) p. 61, &c.
+
+[2] I am well aware that the reality of Dr. Koch's discovery has been
+doubted by some, although it is difficult to perceive why he should
+have made those statements, if not true, at a time when the antiquity
+of man was not yet discussed, either in Europe or here, and he,
+therefore, could expect nothing but contradiction, public opinion
+being totally unprepared for such revelations. Not being a scientific
+palaeontologist, he certainly made some mistakes in putting together
+the bones of the animals exhumed by him; but these failings, in my
+opinion, have no bearing on his observations relative to the
+co-existence of man with extinct animals in North America. Only a
+short time ago some remarks tending to depreciate Dr. Koch's account
+were made by Dr. Schmidt, in an article on the antiquity of man in
+America, published in vol. v, of the _Archiv fuer Anthropologie_. I may
+state here that I was personally acquainted with Dr. Koch, whom I saw
+repeatedly at the meetings of the Academy of Science of Saint Louis.
+
+[3] Prehistoric Times, 1st ed., p. 236.
+
+[4] Geological Survey of Illinois, by A. H. Worthen, vol. i, (1866,)
+p. 38; quoted in Transactions of the Academy of Science of Saint
+Louis, vol. ii, (1868,) p. 567.
+
+[5] The Natural History of the Human Species, London, 1852, p. 89. The
+comparative freshness of the bones of extinct North American animals
+was noticed by Cuvier.
+
+[6] More particularly in Squier's "Aboriginal Monuments of New York,"
+Buffalo, 1851, p. 126.
+
+[7] Fig. 147 on p. 247 of the "Ancient Monuments;" Fig. 106 on p. 509
+of "Flint Chips."
+
+[8] Squier, Aboriginal Monuments of New York, p. 112, &c.
+
+[9] Le Moyne, in De Bry, vol. ii, Francoforti ad Moenum, 1591, pl. XL.
+
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Transcriber's Note:
+
+Obvious typographical errors repaired.
+
+Illustrations have been moved to paragraph breaks.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's North American Stone Implements, by Charles Rau
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NORTH AMERICAN STONE IMPLEMENTS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 39686.txt or 39686.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/9/6/8/39686/
+
+Produced by K Nordquist, JoAnn Greenwood, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+ www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
+North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/39686.zip b/39686.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5e68606
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39686.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3601621
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #39686 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/39686)