summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--39283-8.txt7096
-rw-r--r--39283-8.zipbin0 -> 135651 bytes
-rw-r--r--39283-h.zipbin0 -> 202388 bytes
-rw-r--r--39283-h/39283-h.htm11066
-rw-r--r--39283-h/images/i001.jpgbin0 -> 50847 bytes
-rw-r--r--39283.txt7096
-rw-r--r--39283.zipbin0 -> 135551 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
10 files changed, 25274 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/39283-8.txt b/39283-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8e86185
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39283-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,7096 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Letters to the Clergy, by John Ruskin
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Letters to the Clergy
+ On The Lord's Prayer and the Church
+
+Author: John Ruskin
+
+Editor: F. A. Malleson
+
+Release Date: March 27, 2012 [EBook #39283]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS TO THE CLERGY ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Paul Murray, Elizaveta Shevyakhova and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ LETTERS
+ TO THE CLERGY
+
+ ON
+
+ _The Lord's Prayer and the Church_
+
+ BY JOHN RUSKIN, LL.D., D.C.L.
+
+
+ WITH REPLIES FROM CLERGY AND LAITY, AND
+ AN EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN
+
+
+ EDITED, WITH ESSAYS AND COMMENTS, BY THE
+ REV. F. A. MALLESON, M.A.
+ VICAR OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS
+
+
+ THIRD EDITION
+
+
+ _WITH ADDITIONAL LETTERS BY MR. RUSKIN_
+
+
+ LONDON
+
+ GEORGE ALLEN, 156, CHARING CROSS ROAD
+
+ 1896
+
+ [_All rights reserved_]
+
+
+
+
+ _Printed by_ BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO
+
+ _At the Ballantyne Press_
+
+
+
+
+ INTRODUCTION
+
+
+The first reading of the Letters to the Clerical Society to which they
+were first addressed in September 1879, twenty-three clergy being
+present, was prefaced with the following remarks:--
+
+ A few words by way of introduction will be absolutely necessary
+ before I proceed to read Mr. Ruskin's letters. They originated
+ simply in a proposal of mine, which met with so ready and willing a
+ response, that it almost seemed like a simultaneous thought. They
+ are addressed nominally to myself, as representing the body of
+ clergy whose secretary I have the honour to be; they are, in fact,
+ therefore addressed to this Society primarily. But in the course of
+ the next month or two they will also be read to two other Clerical
+ Societies,--the Ormskirk and the Brighton (junior),--who have
+ acceded to my proposals with much kindness, and in the first case
+ have invited me of their own accord. I have undertaken, to the best
+ of my ability, to arrange and set down the various expressions of
+ opinion, which will be freely uttered. In so limited a time, many
+ who may have much to say that would be really valuable will find no
+ time to-day to deliver it. Of these brethren, I beg that they will
+ do me the favour to express their views at their leisure, in
+ writing. The original letters, the discussions, the letters which
+ may be suggested, and a few comments of the Editor's, will be
+ published in a volume which will appear, I trust, in the beginning
+ of the next year.
+
+ I will now, if you please, undertake the somewhat dangerous
+ responsibility of avowing my own impressions of the letters I am
+ about to read to you. I own that I believe I see in these papers
+ the development of a principle of the deepest interest and
+ importance,--namely, the application of the highest standard in the
+ interpretation of the Gospel message _to_ ourselves as clergymen,
+ and _from_ ourselves to our congregations. We have plenty elsewhere
+ of doctrine and dogma, and undefinable shades of theological
+ opinion. Let us turn at last to practical questions presented for
+ our consideration by an eminent layman whose field of work lies
+ quite as much in religion and ethics, as it does, reaching to so
+ splendid an eminence, in Art. A man is wanted to show to both
+ clergy and laity something of the full force and meaning of Gospel
+ teaching. Many there are, and I am of this number, whose cry is
+ "_Exoriare aliquis_."
+
+ I ask you, if possible, to do in an hour what I have been for the
+ last two months trying to do, to divest myself of old forms of
+ thought, to cast off self-indulgent views of our duty as ministers
+ of religion, to lift ourselves out of those grooves in which we are
+ apt to run so smoothly and so complacently, persuading ourselves
+ that all is well just as it is, and to endeavour to strike into a
+ sterner, harder path, beset with difficulties, but still the path
+ of duty. These papers will demand a close, a patient, and in some
+ places, a few will think, an indulgent consideration; but as a
+ whole, the standard taken is, as I firmly believe, speaking only
+ for myself, lofty and Christian to the extent of an almost ideal
+ perfection. If we do go forward straight in the direction which Mr.
+ Ruskin points out, I know we shall come, sooner or later, to a
+ chasm right across our path. Some of us, I hope, will undauntedly
+ cross it. Let each judge for himself, [Greek: tô telei pistin
+ pherôn].
+
+
+
+
+ PREFACE
+
+ TO THE THIRD EDITION
+
+
+Having been urged to bring out a new edition of the volume first edited
+by me in 1880, and having willingly accepted the invitation to do so, it
+will naturally be expected that I should give some account of the
+circumstances which have led me to take the somewhat unusual step of
+reviving a book which has for twelve years been lying in a state of
+suspended animation.
+
+On the first conception of this volume I applied to Messrs. Strahan, to
+produce it before the reading and thinking world. I should have done
+more wisely, no doubt, had I offered the publication to Mr. George
+Allen, Mr. Ruskin's well-known publisher. It avails not to explain why I
+chose a different course, of which subsequent events only too soon
+showed me the error; for after the first edition had been sold off in a
+week, and while the second was partly sold and partly in preparation,
+Messrs. Strahan's failure was announced, greatly to my surprise; my
+somewhat isolated position in the north country so far from London
+keeping me very imperfectly informed as to what was passing in the
+literary world.
+
+Reasonable, business-like people would ask, why did I not make an effort
+to rescue my little barque out of the general wreckage, and why did I
+not, remembering that Mr. Ruskin had with much kindness freely bestowed
+the copyright on me, save the second edition and arrange with another
+publisher to carry the work on? But I was failing at the time with the
+illness which was effectually cured only by a long sojourn amidst or
+very near to the ice and snow of the Alps. I was incapable of much
+exertion, and, in fact, did not much care. Besides which I am not a
+professed literary man, being chiefly interested in the work of my rural
+parish on the borders of the Lake District, and should not think it
+fair, or even possible, if I may use an equestrian metaphor, to attempt
+to ride two horses at once.
+
+So Mr. Ruskin's letters, etc., as edited by the present writer, came to
+be entirely laid by, though not forgotten by the hosts of Mr. Ruskin's
+friends, followers, and admirers, who regretted the suspension of so
+valuable a work and so rich in great thoughts, teachings, and
+suggestions.
+
+So things remained until August 1895, when a new friend, Mr. Smart, gave
+me the pleasure of a visit, and we talked over the circumstances just
+narrated. Passing over several very pleasant meetings in London, let it
+be sufficient to mention that under the impulse of Mr. George Allen's
+encouragement, and cheered by the valuable assistance and co-operation
+of another friend, Mr. T. J. Wise, I agreed to carry forward this Third
+Edition with the full approbation and consent of Mr. Ruskin himself,
+though it should be said that on account of the state of his health, I
+have been unable to consult him on any of the details of the
+publication.
+
+But it will not be exactly the same volume. Mr. Allen and Mr. Wise,
+having gone over much of my correspondence with Mr. Ruskin, were good
+enough to express a desire that some of those letters addressed to
+myself as a friend should be embodied in the present volume, as being
+strongly illustrative of his views on the subjects dealt with in his
+more formal Letters to the Clergy. I may claim pardon for a feeling of
+great satisfaction with the circumstance that in the course of so long
+and so delicate a correspondence as is contained in this volume, never
+has a cloud overshadowed our paths in this matter, never has a cold
+blast from the east sent a shiver through my system, nor, I presume,
+his. For had Mr. Ruskin felt any resentment at anything I wrote, with
+his usual downright frankness he would not have been backward for an
+hour in expressing in vehement language what he felt. But from first to
+last my intercourse with that kind and eminently distinguished friend
+has been kept bright and happy by his unvarying serenity.
+
+The Letters from Clergy and Laity in this Third Edition occupy much less
+space than in the original one. It was Mr. Ruskin's wish that they
+should be subjected to some process of abridgment; besides which the
+allowing of space for the new feature of additional Ruskin Letters made
+a curtailment in another direction necessary. The plan which seemed to
+me the least discourteous to my numerous correspondents of that time has
+been to make a selection of passages from a certain number of the
+Letters.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+ THE VICARAGE,
+
+ BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS,
+
+ _January 1896._
+
+
+
+
+ CONTENTS
+
+
+ PAGE
+
+ INTRODUCTION v
+
+ PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION xi
+
+ MR. RUSKIN'S LETTERS--
+
+ LETTER I. 3
+
+ " II. 5
+
+ " III. 8
+
+ " IV. 9
+
+ " V. 12
+
+ " VI. 15
+
+ " VII. 19
+
+ " VIII. 25
+
+ " IX. 32
+
+ " X. 36
+
+ " XI. 42
+
+ ESSAYS AND COMMENTS. BY THE EDITOR 49
+
+ EXTRACTS OF LETTERS FROM CLERGY AND LAITY 131
+
+ LETTERS FROM BRANTWOOD-ON-THE-LAKE TO THE
+ VICARAGE OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS 219
+
+ EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN 287
+
+ APPENDIX 323
+
+
+
+
+ MR. RUSKIN'S LETTERS
+
+
+
+
+ I
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON, LANCASHIRE,
+ _20th June, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I could not at once answer your important letter:
+for, though I felt at once the impossibility of my venturing to address
+such an audience as you proposed, I am unwilling to fail in answering to
+any call relating to matters respecting which my feelings have been long
+in earnest, if in any wise it may be possible for me to be of service
+therein. My health--or want of it--now utterly forbids my engagement in
+any duty involving excitement or acute intellectual effort; but I
+think, before the first Tuesday in August, I might be able to write one
+or two letters to yourself, referring to, and more or less completing,
+some passages already printed in Fors and elsewhere, which might, on
+your reading any portions you thought available, become matter of
+discussion during the meeting at some leisure time, after its own main
+purposes had been answered.
+
+At all events, I will think over what I should like, and be able, to
+represent to such a meeting, and only beg you not to think me insensible
+of the honour done me by your wish, and of the gravity of the trust
+reposed in me.
+
+ Ever most faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ THE REV. F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ II
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON,
+ _23rd June, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--Walking, and talking, are now alike impossible to
+me;[1] my strength is gone for both; nor do I believe talking on such
+matters to be of the least use except to promote, between sensible
+people, kindly feeling and knowledge of each other's personal
+characters. I have every trust in _your_ kindness and truth; nor do I
+fear being myself misunderstood by you; what I may be able to put into
+written form, so as to admit of being laid before your friends in
+council, must be set down without any question of personal feeling--as
+simply as a mathematical question or demonstration.
+
+ [1] In answer to the proposal of discussing the subject during a
+ mountain walk.
+
+The first exact question which it seems to me such an assembly may be
+earnestly called upon by laymen to solve, is surely axiomatic: the
+definition of themselves as a body, and of their business as such.
+
+Namely: as clergymen of the Church of England, do they consider
+themselves to be so called merely as the attached servants of a
+particular state? Do they, in their quality of guides, hold a position
+similar to that of the guides of Chamouni or Grindelwald, who being a
+numbered body of examined and trustworthy persons belonging to those
+several villages, have nevertheless no Chamounist or Grindelwaldist
+opinions on the subject of Alpine geography or glacier walking: but are
+prepared to put into practice a common and universal science of Locality
+and Athletics, founded on sure survey and successful practice? Are the
+clergymen of the Ecclesia of England thus simply the attached and
+salaried guides of England and the English, in the way, known of all
+good men, that leadeth unto life?--or are they, on the contrary, a body
+of men holding, or in any legal manner required, or compelled to hold,
+opinions on the subject--say, of the height of the Celestial Mountains,
+the crevasses which go down quickest to the pit, and other cognate
+points of science,--differing from, or even contrary to, the tenets of
+the guides of the Church of France, the Church of Italy, and other
+Christian countries?
+
+Is not this the first of all questions which a Clerical Council has to
+answer in open terms?
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ III
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _6th July, 1879_.
+
+My first letter contained a Layman's plea for a clear answer to the
+question, "What is a clergyman of the Church of England?" Supposing the
+answer to this first to be, that the clergy of the Church of England are
+teachers, not of the Gospel to England, but of the Gospel to all
+nations; and not of the Gospel of Luther, nor of the Gospel of
+Augustine, but of the Gospel of Christ,--then the Layman's second
+question would be:
+
+Can this Gospel of Christ be put into such plain words and short terms
+as that a plain man may understand it?--and, if so, would it not be, in
+a quite primal sense, desirable that it should be so, rather than left
+to be gathered out of Thirty-nine Articles, written by no means in
+clear English, and referring, for further explanation of exactly the
+most important point in the whole tenor of their teaching,[2] to a
+"Homily of Justification,"[3] which is not generally in the possession,
+or even probably within the comprehension, of simple persons?
+
+ Ever faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ [2] Art. xi.
+
+ [3] Homily xi. of the Second Table.
+
+
+
+
+ IV
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _8th July, 1879_.
+
+I am so very glad that you approve of the letter plan, as it enables me
+to build up what I would fain try to say, of little stones, without
+lifting too much for my strength at once; and the sense of addressing a
+friend who understands me and sympathizes with me prevents my being
+brought to a stand by continual need for apology, or fear of giving
+offence.
+
+But yet I do not quite see why you should feel my asking for a simple
+and comprehensible statement of the Christian Gospel as startling. Are
+you not bid to go into _all_ the world and preach it to every creature?
+(I should myself think the clergyman most likely to do good who accepted
+the [Greek: pasê tê ktisei] so literally as at least to sympathize with
+St. Francis' sermon to the birds, and to feel that feeding either sheep
+or fowls, or unmuzzling the ox, or keeping the wrens alive in the snow,
+would be received by their Heavenly Feeder as the _perfect_ fulfilment
+of His "Feed My sheep" in the higher sense.)
+
+That's all a parenthesis; for although I should think that your good
+company would all agree that kindness to animals was a kind of preaching
+to them, and that hunting and vivisection were a kind of blasphemy to
+them, I want only to put the sterner question before your council, _how_
+this Gospel is to be preached either "[Greek: pantachou]" or to "[Greek:
+panta ta ethnê]," if first its preachers have not determined quite
+clearly what it _is_? And might not such definition, acceptable to the
+entire body of the Church of Christ, be arrived at by merely explaining,
+in their completeness and life, the terms of the Lord's Prayer--the
+first words taught to children all over the Christian world?
+
+I will try to explain what I mean of its several articles, in following
+letters; and in answer to the question with which you close your last, I
+can only say that you are at perfect liberty to use any, or all, or any
+parts of them, as you think good. Usually, when I am asked if letters of
+mine may be printed, I say: "Assuredly, provided only that you print
+them entire." But in your hands, I withdraw even this condition, and
+trust gladly to your judgment, remaining always
+
+ Faithfully and affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ THE REV. F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ V
+
+ [Greek: pater hêmôn ho en tois ouranois.]
+
+ _Pater noster qui es in cælis._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _10th July, 1879_.
+
+My meaning, in saying that the Lord's Prayer might be made a foundation
+of Gospel-teaching, was not that it contained all that Christian
+ministers have to teach; but that it contains what all Christians are
+agreed upon as first to be taught; and that no good parish-working
+pastor in any district of the world but would be glad to take his part
+in making it clear and living to his congregation.
+
+And the first clause of it, of course rightly explained, gives us the
+ground of what is surely a mighty part of the Gospel--its "first and
+great commandment," namely, that we have a Father whom we _can_ love,
+and are required to love, and to desire to be with Him in Heaven,
+wherever that may be.
+
+And to declare that we have such a loving Father, whose mercy is over
+_all_ His works, and whose will and law is so lovely and lovable that it
+is sweeter than honey, and more precious than gold, to those who can
+"taste" and "see" that the Lord is Good--this, surely, is a most
+pleasant and glorious good message and _spell_ to bring to men--as
+distinguished from the evil message and accursed spell that Satan has
+brought to the nations of the world instead of it, that they have no
+Father, but only "a consuming fire" ready to devour them, unless they
+are delivered from its raging flame by some scheme of pardon for all,
+for which they are to be thankful, not to the Father, but to the Son.
+
+Supposing this first article of the true Gospel agreed to, how would the
+blessing that closes the epistles of that Gospel become intelligible and
+living, instead of dark and dead: "The grace of Christ, and the _love_
+of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost,"--the most _tender_ word
+being that used of the Father!
+
+
+
+
+ VI
+
+ [Greek: hagiasthêtô to onoma sou.]
+
+ _Sanctificetur nomen tuum._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _12th July, 1879_.
+
+I wonder how many, even of those who honestly and attentively join in
+our Church services, attach any distinct idea to the second clause of
+the Lord's Prayer--the _first petition_ of it--the first thing that they
+are ordered by Christ to seek of their Father?
+
+Am I unjust in thinking that most of them have little more notion on the
+matter than that God has forbidden "bad language," and wishes them to
+pray that everybody may be respectful to Him?
+
+Is it any otherwise with the Third Commandment? Do not most look on it
+merely in the light of the statute on swearing? and read the words
+"will not hold him guiltless" merely as a passionless intimation that
+however carelessly a man may let out a round oath, there really _is_
+something wrong in it?
+
+On the other hand, can anything be more tremendous than the words
+themselves--double-negatived:
+
+ "[Greek: ou gar mê katharisê ... kurios]"?
+
+For _other_ sins there is washing;--for this--none! the seventh verse
+(Exod. xx.), in the Septuagint, marking the real power rather than the
+English, which (I suppose) is literal to the Hebrew.
+
+To my layman's mind, of practical needs in the present state of the
+Church, nothing is so immediate as that of explaining to the
+congregation the meaning of being gathered in His name, and having Him
+in the midst of them; as, on the other hand, of being gathered in
+blasphemy of His name, and having the devil in the midst of
+them--presiding over the prayers which have become an abomination.
+
+For the entire body of the texts in the Gospel against hypocrisy are one
+and all nothing but the expansion of the threatening that closes the
+Third Commandment. For as "the name whereby He shall be called is THE
+LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS,"--so the taking that name in vain is the sum of
+"the deceivableness of _un_righteousness in them that perish."
+
+Without dwelling on the possibility--which I do not myself, however, for
+a moment doubt--of an honest clergyman's being able actually to prevent
+the entrance among his congregation of persons leading openly wicked
+lives, could any subject be more vital to the purposes of your meetings
+than the difference between the present and the probable state of the
+Christian Church which would result, were it more the effort of zealous
+parish priests, instead of getting wicked _poor_ people to _come_ to
+church, to get wicked rich ones to stay out of it?
+
+Lest, in any discussion of such question, it might be, as it too often
+is, alleged that "the Lord looketh upon the heart," etc, let me be
+permitted to say--with as much positiveness as may express my deepest
+conviction--that, while indeed it is the Lord's business to look upon
+the heart, it is the pastor's to look upon the hands and the lips; and
+that the foulest oaths of the thief and the street-walker are, in the
+ears of God, sinless as the hawk's cry, or the gnat's murmur, compared
+to the responses, in the Church service, on the lips of the usurer and
+the adulterer, who have destroyed, not their own souls only, but those
+of the outcast ones whom they have made their victims.
+
+It is for the meeting of Clergymen themselves--not for a layman
+addressing them--to ask further, how much the name of God may be taken
+in vain, and profaned instead of hallowed--_in_ the pulpit, as well as
+under it.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ VII
+
+ [Greek: elthetô hê basileia sou.]
+
+ _Adveniat regnum tuum._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _14th July, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--Sincere thanks for both your letters and the proofs
+sent. Your comment and conducting link, when needed, will be of the
+greatest help and value, I am well assured, suggesting what you know
+will be the probable feeling of your hearers, and the point that will
+come into question.
+
+Yes, certainly, that "His" in the fourth line[4] was meant to imply that
+eternal presence of Christ; as in another passage,[5] referring to the
+Creation, "when His right hand strewed the snow on Lebanon, and
+smoothed the slopes of Calvary;" but in so far as we dwell on that
+truth, "Hast thou seen _Me_, Philip, and not the Father?"[6] we are not
+teaching the people what is specially the Gospel of _Christ_ as having a
+distinct function, namely, to _serve_ the Father, and do the Father's
+will. And in all His human relations to us, and commands to us, it is as
+the Son of Man, not as the "power of God and wisdom of God," that He
+acts and speaks. Not as the Power; for _He_ must pray, like one of us.
+Not as the Wisdom; for He must not know "if it be possible" His prayer
+should be heard.
+
+ [4] In a proof sheet of a book of the Editor's at that time in the
+ press.
+
+ [5] Referring to the closing sentence of the third paragraph of the
+ fifth letter, which _seemed_ to express what I felt could not be
+ Mr. Ruskin's full meaning, I pointed out to him the following
+ sentence in "Modern Painters:"--
+
+ "When, in the desert, Jesus was girding Himself for the work of
+ life, angels of life came and ministered unto Him; now, in the
+ fair world, when He is girding Himself for the work of death,
+ the ministrants came to Him from the grave; but from the grave
+ conquered. One from the tomb under Abarim, which _His_ own hand
+ had sealed long ago; the other from the rest which He had
+ entered without seeing corruption."
+
+ On this I made a remark somewhat to the following effect: that I
+ felt sure Mr. Ruskin regarded the loving work of the Father and of
+ the Son as _equal_ in the forgiveness of sins and redemption of
+ mankind; that what is done by the Father is in reality done also by
+ the Son; and that it is by a mere accommodation to human infirmity
+ of understanding that the doctrine of the Trinity is revealed to us
+ in language, inadequate indeed to convey divine truths, but still
+ the only language possible; and I asked whether some such feeling
+ was not present in his mind when he used the pronoun "His" in the
+ above passage from "Modern Painters" of the Son, where it would be
+ usually understood of the Father; and as a corollary, whether, in
+ the letter, he does not himself fully recognise the fact of the
+ redemption of the world by the loving self-sacrifice of the Son
+ being in entire concurrence with the equally loving will of the
+ Father. This, as well as I can recollect, is the origin of the
+ passage in the second paragraph in this seventh letter.--EDITOR OF
+ LETTERS.
+
+ [6] "Yet hast thou not known Me, Philip? he that hath seen Me hath
+ seen the Father" (John xiv. 9).--EDITOR.
+
+And in what I want to say of the third clause of His prayer (_His_, not
+merely as His ordering, but His using), it is especially this comparison
+between _His_ kingdom, and His Father's, that I want to see the
+disciples guarded against. I believe very few, even of the most earnest,
+using that petition, realize that it is the Father's--not the
+Son's--kingdom, that they pray may come,--although the whole prayer is
+foundational on that fact: "_For_ Thine is the kingdom, the power, and
+the glory." And I fancy that the mind of the most faithful Christian is
+quite led away from its proper hope, by dwelling on the reign--or the
+coming again--of Christ; which, indeed, they are to look for, and
+_watch_ for, but not to pray for. Their prayer is to be for the greater
+kingdom to which He, risen and having all His enemies under His feet, is
+to surrender _His_, "that God may be All in All."
+
+And, though the greatest, it is that everlasting kingdom which the
+poorest of us can advance. We cannot hasten Christ's coming. "Of the day
+and the hour, knoweth no man." But the kingdom of God is as a grain of
+mustard-seed:--we can sow of it; it is as a foam-globe of leaven:--we
+can mingle it; and its glory and its joy are that even the birds of the
+air can lodge in the branches thereof.
+
+Forgive me for getting back to my sparrows; but truly in the present
+state of England, the fowls of the air are the only creatures, tormented
+and murdered as they are, that yet have here and there nests, and peace,
+and joy in the Holy Ghost. And it would be well if many of us, in
+reading that text, "The kingdom of God is NOT meat and drink," had even
+got so far as to the understanding that it is at least _as much_, and
+that until we had fed the hungry, there was no power in us to inspire
+the unhappy.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+I will write my feeling about the pieces of the Life of Christ[7] you
+have sent me in a private letter. I may say at once that I am sure it
+will do much good, and will be upright and intelligible, which how few
+religious writings are?
+
+ [7] The Life and Work of Jesus Christ. Ward and Lock.
+
+
+
+
+ VIII
+
+ [Greek: genêthêtô to thelêma sou, hôs en ouranô, kai epi gês.]
+
+ _Fiat voluntas tua sicut in coelo et in terra._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _9th August, 1879_.
+
+I was reading the second chapter of Malachi this morning by chance, and
+wondering how many clergymen ever read it, and took to heart the
+"commandment for _them_."
+
+For they are always ready enough to call themselves priests (though they
+know themselves to be nothing of the sort), whenever there is any
+dignity to be got out of the title; but, whenever there is any good,
+hot scolding or unpleasant advice given them by the prophets, in that
+self-assumed character of theirs, they are as ready to quit it as ever
+Dionysus his lion-skin, when he finds the character of Herakles
+inconvenient.
+
+"Ye have wearied the Lord with your words;" (yes, and some of His people
+too, in your time), "yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied Him? When ye
+say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and He
+delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?"
+
+How many, again and again I wonder, of the lively young ecclesiastics
+supplied to the increasing demand of our west ends of flourishing Cities
+of the Plain, ever consider what sort of sin it is for which God (unless
+they lay it to heart) will "curse their blessings, and spread dung upon
+their faces;" or have understood, even in the dimmest manner, what part
+_they_ had taken, and were taking, in "corrupting the covenant of the
+Lord with Levi, and causing many to stumble at the Law."
+
+Perhaps the most subtle and unconscious way in which the religious
+teachers upon whom the ends of the world are come, have done this, is in
+never telling their people the meaning of the clause in the Lord's
+Prayer, which, of all others, their most earnest hearers have oftenest
+on their lips: "Thy will be done." They allow their people to use it as
+if their Father's will were always to kill their babies, or do something
+unpleasant to them; and following comfort and wealth, instead of
+explaining to them that the first and intensest article of their
+Father's will was their own sanctification; and that the one only path
+to national prosperity and to domestic peace, was to understand what the
+will of the Lord was, and to do all they could to get it done. Whereas
+one would think, by the tone of the eagerest preachers nowadays, that
+they held their blessed office to be that, not of showing men how to do
+their Father's will on earth, but how to get to heaven without doing any
+of it either here or there!
+
+I say, especially, the most eager preachers; for nearly the whole
+Missionary body (with the hottest Evangelistic sect of the English
+Church) is at this moment composed of men who think the Gospel they are
+to carry to mend the world with, forsooth, is that, "If any man sin, he
+hath an Advocate with the Father;" while I have never yet, in my own
+experience, met either with a Missionary or a Town Bishop who so much
+as professed himself "to understand what the will of the Lord" was, far
+less to teach anybody else to do it; and for fifty preachers, yes, and
+fifty hundreds whom I have heard proclaiming the Mediator of the New
+Testament, that "they which were called might receive the promise of
+eternal inheritance," I have never yet heard so much as _one_ heartily
+proclaiming against all those "deceivers with vain words" (Eph. v. 6),
+that "no covetous person which is an idolater, hath _any_ inheritance in
+the kingdom of Christ, or of God;" and on myself personally and publicly
+challenging the Bishops of England generally, and by name the Bishop of
+Manchester, to say whether usury was, or was not, according to the will
+of God, I have received no answer from any one of them.[8]
+
+ [8] Fors Clavigera, Letter lxxxii., p. 323.
+
+
+
+ _13th August._
+
+I have allowed myself, in the beginning of this letter, to dwell on the
+equivocal use of the word "Priest" in the English Church (see
+"Christopher Harvey," Grosart's edition, p. 38), because the assumption
+of the mediatorial, in defect of the pastoral, office by the clergy
+fulfils itself, naturally and always, in their pretending to absolve the
+sinner from his punishment, instead of purging him from his sin; and
+practically, in their general patronage and encouragement of all the
+iniquity of the world, by steadily preaching away the penalties of it.
+So that the great cities of the earth, which ought to be the places set
+on its hills, with the Temple of the Lord in the midst of them, to which
+the tribes should go up,--centres to the Kingdoms and Provinces of
+Honour, Virtue, and the Knowledge of the law of God,--have become,
+instead, loathsome centres of fornication and covetousness--the smoke of
+their sin going up into the face of heaven like the furnace of Sodom,
+and the pollution of it rotting and raging through the bones and the
+souls of the peasant people round them, as if they were each a volcano
+whose ashes broke out in blains upon man and upon beast.
+
+And in the midst of them, their freshly-set-up steeples ring the crowd
+to a weekly prayer that the rest of their lives may be pure and holy,
+while they have not the slightest intention of purifying, sanctifying,
+or changing their lives in any the smallest particular; and their clergy
+gather, each into himself, the curious dual power, and Janus-faced
+majesty in mischief, of the prophet that prophesies falsely, and the
+priest that bears rule by his means.
+
+And the people love to have it so.
+
+
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _12th August_.
+
+I am very glad of your little note from Brighton. I thought it needless
+to send the two letters there, which you will find at home; and they
+pretty nearly end all _I_ want to say; for the remaining clauses of the
+prayer touch on things too high for me. But I will send you one
+concluding letter about them.
+
+
+
+
+ IX
+
+ [Greek: ton arton hêmôn ton epiousion dos hêmin sêmeron.]
+
+ _Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _19th August_.
+
+I retained the foregoing letter by me till now, lest you should think it
+written in any haste or petulance: but it is every word of it
+deliberate, though expressing the bitterness of twenty years of vain
+sorrow and pleading concerning these things. Nor am I able to write,
+otherwise, anything of the next following clause of the prayer;--for no
+words could be burning enough to tell the evils which have come on the
+world from men's using it thoughtlessly and blasphemously, praying God
+to give them what they are deliberately resolved to steal. For all true
+Christianity is known--as its Master was--in breaking of bread, and all
+false Christianity in stealing it.
+
+Let the clergyman only apply--with impartial and level sweep--to his
+congregation the great pastoral order: "The man that will not work,
+neither should he eat;" and be resolute in requiring each member of his
+flock to tell him _what_--day by day--they do to earn their
+dinners;--and he will find an entirely new view of life and its
+sacraments open upon him and them.
+
+For the man who is not--day by day--doing work which will earn his
+dinner, must be stealing his dinner; and the actual fact is, that the
+great mass of men calling themselves Christians do actually live by
+robbing the poor of their bread, and by no other trade whatsoever; and
+the simple examination of the mode of the produce and consumption of
+European food--who digs for it, and who eats it--will prove that to any
+honest human soul.
+
+Nor is it possible for any Christian Church to exist but in pollutions
+and hypocrisies beyond all words, until the virtues of a life moderate
+in its self-indulgence, and wide in its offices of temporal ministry to
+the poor, are insisted on as the normal conditions in which, only, the
+prayer to God for the harvest of the earth is other than blasphemy.
+
+In the second place. Since in the parable in Luke, the bread asked for
+is shown to be also, and chiefly, the Holy Spirit (Luke xi. 13), and the
+prayer, "Give us each day our daily bread" is, in its fulness, the
+disciples' "Lord, evermore give us _this_ bread,"--the clergyman's
+question to his whole flock, primarily literal, "Children, have ye here
+any meat?" must ultimately be always the greater spiritual one:
+"Children, have ye here any Holy Spirit?" or, "Have ye not heard yet
+whether there _be_ any? and, instead of a Holy Ghost the Lord and Giver
+of Life, do you only believe in an unholy mammon, Lord and Giver of
+Death?"
+
+The opposition between the two Lords has been, and will be as long as
+the world lasts, absolute, irreconcilable, mortal; and the clergyman's
+first message to his people of this day is--if he be faithful--"Choose
+ye this day, whom ye will serve."
+
+ Ever faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ X
+
+ [Greek: kai aphes hêmin ta opheilêmata hêmôn, hôs kai
+ hêmeis aphiemen tois opheiletais hêmôn.]
+
+ _Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus
+ debitoribus nostris._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _3rd September_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I have been very long before trying to say so much
+as a word about the sixth clause of the Pater; for whenever I began
+thinking of it, I was stopped by the sorrowful sense of the hopeless
+task you poor clergymen had, nowadays, in recommending and teaching
+people to love their enemies, when their whole energies were already
+devoted to swindling their friends.
+
+But, in any days, past or now, the clause is one of such difficulty,
+that, to understand it, means almost to know the love of God which
+passeth knowledge.
+
+But, at all events, it is surely the pastor's duty to prevent his flock
+from _mis_-understanding it; and above all things to keep them from
+supposing that God's forgiveness is to be had simply for the asking, by
+those who "wilfully sin after they have received the knowledge of the
+truth."
+
+There is one very simple lesson, also, needed especially by people in
+circumstances of happy life, which I have never heard fully enforced
+from the pulpit, and which is usually the more lost sight of, because
+the fine and inaccurate word "trespasses" is so often used instead of
+the simple and accurate one, "debts." Among people well educated and
+happily circumstanced, it may easily chance that long periods of their
+lives pass without any such conscious sin as could, on any discovery or
+memory of it, make them cry out, in truth and in pain, "I have sinned
+against the Lord." But scarcely an hour of their happy days can pass
+over them without leaving--were their hearts open--some evidence written
+there that they have "left undone the things that they ought to have
+done," and giving them bitterer and heavier cause to cry and cry
+again--for ever, in the pure words of their Master's prayer, "Dimitte
+nobis _debita_ nostra."
+
+In connection with the more accurate translation of "debts," rather than
+"trespasses," it would surely be well to keep constantly in the mind of
+complacent and inoffensive congregations, that in Christ's own prophecy
+of the manner of the last judgment, the condemnation is pronounced only
+on the sins of omission: "I was hungry, and ye gave Me no meat."
+
+But, whatever the manner of sin, by offence or defect, which the
+preacher fears in his people, surely he has of late been wholly remiss
+in compelling their definite recognition of it, in its several and
+personal particulars. Nothing in the various inconsistency of human
+nature is more grotesque than its willingness to be taxed with any
+quantity of sins in the gross, and its resentment at the insinuation of
+having committed the smallest parcel of them in detail. And the English
+Liturgy, evidently drawn up with the amiable intention of making
+religion as pleasant as possible to a people desirous of saving their
+souls with no great degree of personal inconvenience, is perhaps in no
+point more unwholesomely lenient than in its concession to the popular
+conviction that we may obtain the present advantage, and escape the
+future punishment, of any sort of iniquity, by dexterously concealing
+the manner of it from man, and triumphantly confessing the quantity of
+it to God.
+
+Finally, whatever the advantages and decencies of a form of prayer, and
+how wide soever the scope given to its collected passages, it cannot be
+at one and the same time fitted for the use of a body of well-taught and
+experienced Christians, such as should join the services of a Church
+nineteen centuries old,--and adapted to the needs of the timid sinner
+who has that day first entered its porch, or of the remorseful publican
+who has only recently become sensible of his call to a pew.
+
+And surely our clergy need not be surprised at the daily increasing
+distrust in the public mind of the efficacy of Prayer, after having so
+long insisted on their offering supplication, _at least_ every Sunday
+morning at eleven o'clock, that the rest of their lives hereafter might
+be pure and holy, leaving them conscious all the while that they would
+be similarly required to inform the Lord next week, at the same hour,
+that "there was no health in them"!
+
+Among the much rebuked follies and abuses of so-called "Ritualism," none
+that I have heard of are indeed so dangerously and darkly "Ritual" as
+this piece of authorized mockery of the most solemn act of human life,
+and only entrance of eternal life--Repentance.
+
+ Believe me, dear Mr. Malleson,
+ Ever faithfully and respectfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ XI
+
+ [Greek: kai mê eisenegkês hêmas eis peirasmon, alla rhusai hêmas apo
+ tou ponêrou; hoti sou estin hê basileia kai hê dunamis kai hê doxa
+ eis tous aiônas; amên.]
+
+ _Et ne nos inducas in tentationem; sed libera nos a malo; Quia tuum
+ est regmum, potentia, et gloria in sæcula sæculorum. Amen._
+
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _14th September, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--The gentle words in your last letter referring to
+the difference between yourself and me in the degree of hope with which
+you could regard what could not but appear to the general mind Utopian
+in designs for the action of the Christian Church, surely might best be
+answered by appeal to the consistent tone of the prayer we have been
+examining.
+
+Is not every one of its petitions for a perfect state? and is not this
+last clause of it, of which we are to think to-day--if fully
+understood--a petition not only for the restoration of Paradise, but of
+Paradise in which there shall be no deadly fruit, or, at least, no
+tempter to praise it? And may we not admit that it is probably only for
+want of the earnest use of this last petition, that not only the
+preceding ones have become formal with us, but that the private and
+simply restricted prayer for the little things we each severally desire,
+has become by some Christians dreaded and unused, and by others used
+faithlessly, and therefore with disappointment?
+
+And is it not for want of this special directness and simplicity of
+petition, and of the sense of its acceptance, that the whole nature of
+prayer has been doubted in our hearts, and disgraced by our lips; that
+we are afraid to ask God's blessing on the earth, when the scientific
+people tell us He has made previous arrangements to curse it; and that,
+instead of obeying, without fear or debate, the plain order, "Ask, and
+ye shall receive, that your joy may be full," we sorrowfully sink back
+into the apology for prayer, that "it is a wholesome exercise, even when
+fruitless," and that we ought piously always to suppose that the text
+really means no more than "Ask, and ye shall _not_ receive, that your
+joy may be _empty_"?
+
+Supposing we were first all of us quite sure that we _had_ prayed,
+honestly, the prayer against temptation, and that we would thankfully be
+refused anything we had set our hearts upon, if indeed God saw that it
+would lead us into evil, might we not have confidence afterwards that He
+in whose hand the King's heart is, as the rivers of water, would turn
+our tiny little hearts also in the way that they should go, and that
+_then_ the special prayer for the joys He taught them to seek, would be
+answered to the last syllable, and to overflowing?
+
+It is surely scarcely necessary to say, farther, what the holy teachers
+of all nations have invariably concurred in showing,--that faithful
+prayer implies always correlative exertion; and that no man can ask
+honestly or hopefully to be delivered from temptation, unless he has
+himself honestly and firmly determined to do the best he can to keep out
+of it. But, in modern days, the first aim of all Christian parents is to
+place their children in circumstances where the temptations (which they
+are apt to call "opportunities") may be as great and as many as
+possible; where the sight and promise of "all these things" in Satan's
+gift may be brilliantly near; and where the act of "falling down to
+worship me" may be partly concealed by the shelter, and partly excused,
+as involuntary, by the pressure, of the concurrent crowd.
+
+In what respect the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of _them_,
+differ from the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory, which are God's for
+ever, is seldom, as far as I have heard, intelligibly explained from the
+pulpit; and still less the irreconcilable hostility between the two
+royalties and realms asserted in its sternness of decision.
+
+Whether it be indeed Utopian to believe that the kingdom we are taught
+to pray for _may_ come--verily come--for the asking, it is surely not
+for man to judge; but it is at least at his choice to resolve that he
+will no longer render obedience, nor ascribe glory and power, to the
+Devil. If he cannot find strength in himself to advance towards Heaven,
+he may at least say to the power of Hell, "Get thee behind me;" and
+staying himself on the testimony of Him who saith, "Surely I come
+quickly," ratify his happy prayer with the faithful "Amen, even so,
+come, Lord Jesus."
+
+ Ever, my dear friend,
+ Believe me affectionately
+ and gratefully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ ESSAYS AND COMMENTS
+
+ ON THE
+
+ FOREGOING LETTERS
+
+ BY THE EDITOR
+
+
+
+
+ ESSAYS AND COMMENTS
+
+
+Feeling deeply, and anxiously, the greatness of the responsibility laid
+upon me to act, as it were, the part of an envoy between so eminent a
+teacher as Mr. Ruskin and my brethren in the Ministry, I have thought
+that it might not be taken amiss if I prefaced my account of the origin
+of the series of letters placed in my hands for publication (see Letter
+8th July, 1879)[9] with just a mere allusion to one written to me four
+years ago.
+
+ [9] No. IV.
+
+One or two imperfect conversations, leading up to the subject of the
+Resurrection, which had been broken off by accidental circumstances,
+together with the letter alluded to, had stimulated in me a feeling of
+something more than curiosity--rather one of anxious interest--to learn
+more of Mr. Ruskin's views upon matters which are at the present day
+giving rise to a good deal of agitated discussion among intellectual
+men.
+
+I am thankful to be able to avow that, for my own part, I am a firm and
+conscientious, not a thoughtless and passive, believer in the doctrines
+of the Church of Christ as held by the majority of serious-minded
+religious men in the Established Church. Mr. Ruskin was mistaken in his
+much too ready assumption that I (simply because I am a clergyman) am a
+believer on compulsion; that for the peace of my soul I have only to
+thank religious anæsthetics, and that I ever preach against the
+wickedness of involuntary doubt. God forbid that I should ever take on
+myself to denounce as wilful sin any scruples of conscience which owe
+their origin to honest inquiries after truth. I trust that he knows me
+better now.
+
+Feeling thus decided and certain as to the ground I stand upon, and
+earnestly desirous on every account to investigate the nature of Mr.
+Ruskin's doubts, whatever they might be, in a most fraternal spirit, as
+a kindly-favoured friend and neighbour (for, in our lake and mountain
+district, an interval of a dozen miles does not destroy neighbourhood
+between spirits with any degree of kinship), I sought for a more
+lengthened conversation, and obtained the opportunity without
+difficulty. The occasion was found in a very delightful summer afternoon
+on the lake, and up the sides of the Old Man of Coniston, to view a
+group of remarkable rocks by the desolate, storm-beaten crags of Goat's
+Water,[10] that saddest and loneliest of mountain tarns, which lies in
+the deep hollow between the mountain and its opposing buttress, the Dow
+Crags. This most interesting ramble in the undivided company of one so
+highly and so deservedly valued in the world of letters and of art and
+higher matters yet, served to my mind for more purposes than one, while
+we wandered amidst impressive scenes, passing from the sweet and gentle
+peaceful loveliness of the bright green vale of Coniston and its
+charming lake to the bleak desolation, the terrible sublimity of the
+mountain tarn barriered in by its stupendous crags, amongst which lay
+those singular-looking, weather-beaten, and lightning-riven rocks which
+were the more immediate object of our visit.
+
+ [10] "Deucalion," p. 222.
+
+But to myself the chief and happiest result of our conversation was the
+firm conviction that neither the censorious and unthinking world, nor
+perhaps even Mr. Ruskin himself, knows how deeply and truly a Christian
+man, in the widest sense of the word, Mr. Ruskin is. It is neither the
+time nor the place, nor indeed would it be consistent with propriety, to
+analyze before others the convictions formed on that memorable summer
+afternoon. It must suffice for the present to say that the opinions then
+formed laid the foundation of a friendship on a happier basis than that
+which had heretofore been permitted me, and prepared my way to enter
+with confidence upon the plan of which the present volume is the fruit.
+
+Last June, in the course of a short visit to Brantwood, I proposed to
+Mr. Ruskin to come to address the members of a Northern Clerical
+Society, a body of some seventy or eighty clergy, who have done me the
+honour to appoint me their honorary secretary, now for about nine
+years, since its foundation. On the ground of impaired health, the
+legacy left behind it by the serious illness which had, two years
+before, threatened even his life, Mr. Ruskin excused himself from
+appearing in person before our Society; but proposed instead to write
+letters to me which might serve as a basis for discussion amongst us.
+
+Letter I. will explain the origin of the series that come after.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER II
+
+
+The question laid down in this letter, cleared of all metaphorical
+ornament, is, as is perfectly natural and instinctive with Mr. Ruskin,
+one which goes down to the foundation of things--here, the character and
+mission of the Christian ministry. Are we (Mr. Ruskin implies, Are we
+_not_?) bound to believe and to teach after certain formulæ, which,
+being many of them peculiar to ourselves, separate us from the national
+Churches of France and Italy? Are we free, or are we bound? Or do we
+enjoy a reasonable amount of liberty and no more? On the platform we
+occupy do we allow none but English Churchmen to stand? Must we keep all
+other Christians at arm's length? Do the conditions attached to the
+emoluments we receive prohibit us from holding or teaching any other
+opinions than those we have subscribed to?
+
+It is a question not to be approached without a tremor. But no abstract
+answer can well be given. Human nature replies for itself in the
+spectacle of the clergy of the Church of England divided and subdivided;
+here deeply sundered, there of different complexions amicably blending
+together, holding every variety of opinion which the Church allows or
+disallows within her borders. Human nature absolutely refuses to be
+shackled in its positive beliefs. Authority may try, or even appear to
+perform, the feat of fettering thought and making men march in step to
+one common end in orderly ranks; but she has invariably at last to
+confess her impotence.[11]
+
+ [11] The clergyman who subscribes still whispers to himself, or
+ soon will, "Nullius addictus jurare in verba magistri."
+
+The ministers of the Church cannot safely be set free by Act of
+Parliament to teach whatever seems good to each. Some respect must be
+shown to congregations too. If the clergy claim on their side the right
+of independent thought, which they are quite justified in doing, the
+congregations on their side have a much greater right to a consistent
+teaching, which shall not distract their minds with strange and unwonted
+forms of Christianity.
+
+Mr. Ruskin, as he often does, is going _too deep_. He asks for that
+which we shall never see in this world,--the simple, pure religion of
+the Bible to be taught in all singleness and simplicity of mind by men
+whose only commission is held from God, by or without the channel of
+human authority, to show men, women, and children the way "to the summit
+of the celestial mountains," and to set an awful warning by conspicuous
+beacons against the "crevasses which go down quickest to the pit." But
+who shall say that he is wrong? Nay, rather, it is we that are wrong in
+resting satisfied with our low views of things, while Ruskin soars above
+our heads.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER III
+
+
+I would preface the few remarks I wish to make upon this letter by an
+extract from a letter just received from a dear good friend:
+
+ "I have already read these deeply interesting letters five times.
+ They are like 'the foam-globes of leaven.' I must say they have
+ exercised my mind very much. Things in them which at first seem
+ rather startling, prove on closer examination to be full of deep
+ truth. The suggestions in them lead to 'great searchings of heart.'
+ There is much with which I entirely agree; much over which to
+ ponder. What an insight into human nature is shown in the remark
+ that though we are so ready to call ourselves 'miserable sinners'
+ we resent being accused of any special fault!
+
+ "S. B."
+
+By the side of this, it will be instructive, though strange, if I place
+an extract from another note from one whom I have long known and highly
+esteemed; and it will be seen what a singular "discerner of hearts" and
+"divider of spirits" is this series of letters:--
+
+ "If they are really meant _au sérieux_, I could not express any
+ opinion of them without implying a reflection upon you also, as you
+ seem to endorse them so fully. I prefer, therefore, to say merely
+ that, as a whole, they offer one of the most remarkable instances I
+ ever met with of the old adage, 'Ne sutor ultra crepidam.'"[12]
+
+ [12] Let me say here, once for all, that I have already three times
+ had this proverb quoted against Mr. Ruskin; and no proverb could be
+ more remote from the purpose. For while it is the shoemaker's
+ business, _as a livelihood_, to make shoes, a painter's to paint
+ pictures, the merchant's to sell goods, and perhaps Mr. Ruskin's to
+ write books which every one reads, _religion is everybody's
+ business_. Christian men and women, of all classes and professions,
+ make the Bible their study, because of its inestimable importance;
+ and who shall say that they are not absolutely right? For my part I
+ should be very glad to hear that my bootmaker was a religious man:
+ his boots would be none the worse for it. I hope the _sutor_ will
+ be brought in no more, unless he can appear with a better grace.
+
+
+In spite of this I retain all my old high opinion of the writer of these
+lines, and feel convinced that he will soon think very differently.
+
+Yes, it is as my first correspondent has said, "Things which at first
+seem startling, on examination prove to be full of deep truth." In the
+short compass of this Letter III. lies enfolded a vast question, which,
+in the midst of the friction and conflict of ages of strife, has been
+shuffled away into odd corners, to be brought out into life only now and
+then, when a man is born into the world who sees what few will even
+glance at, and who will say out that which ought to be spoken, though
+but few may listen. What is the question which is put here so tersely
+and so pointedly? It is this, which I am only putting a little
+differently, not with the most distant idea of improving upon Mr.
+Ruskin's felicitous touches; but, because expressed in twofold fashion,
+what has escaped one may strike another in a different form.
+
+Is a clergyman of the Church of England a teacher of the doctrine and
+practice and discipline of the Church of England within her limits only,
+narrow as they are, when compared with Christendom? or is there not
+rather a wider, more comprehensive Church yet--that of Christ upon
+earth--which he must serve, which he must preach, in forgetfulness of
+the limited boundaries within which by his education and his ordination
+vows he is _apparently_ bound to remain? Is there not enough of
+Christianity common to all the Christian nations upon earth, and which
+ought to be made the subject of teaching to the ignorant and the
+castaway? Is it quite a right thing that the natives of Madagascar, for
+instance, should see parties of missionaries arriving amongst them: one,
+in all the gorgeous trappings and with all the elaborate ritual of Rome;
+another in rusty black coats and hats and dirty white neckties,
+repudiating all but the very barest necessary ceremonial; a third,
+possibly disunited in itself, coming as High Churchmen or Low Churchmen,
+with differing peculiarities? Is this an edifying spectacle for the
+Malagasy? And can the Gospel be preached as effectually in this highly
+diversified fashion as it would be with the simplicity of a reasonable
+and just sufficiently elastic uniformity?
+
+Coming before many people of infinite diversity of mind, it cannot be
+doubted that Christianity must necessarily take a variety of forms, to
+suit different intelligences, and adapt itself to differing situations.
+But in all this large variety of forms of religion, ranging from mere
+paganism at one end, just a little unavoidably altered by the contact of
+Christianity, and at the other extremity a pure religion, but refined
+and intellectual, I do not see exactly what is the form of Christianity
+which the Church of England is to preach to the masses at home and
+abroad. As long as England takes the Gospel to the ignorant in such
+infinitely diversified forms, it is as if an incapable general were to
+divide his forces preparatory to an assault upon a compact and
+well-defended stronghold.
+
+It is enough to make one weep with vexation and humiliation to see what
+sort of religion would be presented to the world if some who claim to
+have all truth on their side could have their own way. I say to have the
+truth on their side,--which is a very different thing from being on the
+side of truth. There is even a new religion--for it is certainly not the
+old--growing popular with "thinkers," who write and read in the three
+great half-crown monthlies, which is evolved in the most curious
+variety out of their inner consciousness by religion-makers, whose
+fertile brains are the only soil that can bring forth such productions.
+What is the vast uneducated world to do with these extraordinary forms
+of religion which are as many-sided and many-faced as their inventors?
+
+Now Mr. Ruskin and many others see this state of things with pity and
+compassion, and ask, "Cannot this Gospel of Christ be put into such
+plain words and short terms as that a plain man may understand it?" Why
+is there no such easy summary provided by authority to teach the poor
+and simple? The Apostles' Creed is good for its own end and purpose, but
+it requires great expansion to be made to include Gospel teaching, and
+it contains nothing practical. The Thirty-nine Articles are not even
+intended (as Mr. Ruskin by some oversight seems to think they are) to be
+a summary of the Gospel. We have no concise and plain, clear and
+intelligible form of sound words to answer this most important end. The
+Church Catechism, from old associations, belongs to childhood.
+
+Every reasonable person must agree with Mr. Ruskin, that there could be
+no harm, but much good, in Christians making a little less of their
+Churchmanship, and a little more of their broad Christianity.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER IV
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin pleads in this letter with touching eloquence for the
+guidance of the law of love, that irresistible law, one effect of which
+is to give to the highest probability the force of a sufficient
+certainty, and establishes in the man the mental habit best described as
+_certitude_.
+
+In Cardinal Newman's "History of My Religious Opinions," p. 18, he
+quotes some beautiful passages from Keble's conversations with himself
+(disagreeing with him all the time), in which he had quoted, "I will
+guide thee _with mine eye_" (Psalm xxxii. 8), as the expression of the
+gentle suasive power that directs the steps of the child and friend of
+God, as distinguished from "the bit and bridle" laid upon horse and
+mule, who represent unwilling slaves recognising no law but that of
+force or coercion. It is an Eye whose gaze is ever fixed on us, the "Eye
+of God's Word," "like that of a portrait uniformly fixed on us, turn
+where we will."[13] And Keble is right so far as concerns the true
+children and friends of God, subject, as their highest control, to the
+law of love. Pure and exalted minds ever strain for, and yearn after, a
+general and outward manifestation of the witness that man is "the image
+and glory of God" (1 Cor. xi. 7).
+
+ [13] "Christian Year," St. Bartholomew's Day, with quotations from
+ Miller's Bampton Lectures.
+
+Unhappily, we are not so constituted by nature. The inroads and ravages
+of sin are but too evident, as well in those upon whom episcopal hands
+have been laid, as in the ranks of the laity. Are not wilfulness and
+pride of intellect and glorification of self ever exercising such a
+power in the earth, that checks and restraints are found absolutely
+necessary to curb and control the determination of many of the ministers
+of the Church not only to _think_ as seems good to them (which they have
+a perfect right to do), but openly to _teach and to preach_ whatever
+doctrines they may have conceived in their own minds, or have learnt
+from others, contrary to the received doctrines of the Church of
+England; which they have no right to do as long as they remain ministers
+of the Church whose doctrines they impugn?
+
+Mr. Ruskin correctly assumes that the terms of the Lord's Prayer, being
+in the very words of Christ, do contain a body of Divine doctrine; and
+they would be the fittest to adopt as a standard of Christian teaching,
+_if_ only all men were as candid, sincere, and straightforward as
+himself. But because there is no certainty that any large and
+preponderating body of men will exhibit these graces of Christianity in
+themselves, and combine with them gentleness, tolerance, and
+forbearance, therefore they _must_ be held in "with bit and
+bridle,"--that is, with Articles and Creeds and declarations,--"lest
+they fall upon thee," and fill the Church more full of sedition,
+disaffection, and disquiet than it already is.
+
+Cardinal Newman himself is an example of the necessity of the restraints
+of creeds, as well, indeed, as of their general inefficiency to
+maintain unity. His "History of my Religious Opinions," at least in its
+beginning, is but the story of a long succession of phases of belief and
+disbelief, originating in--what? In study of the Word of God? in Divine
+contemplation, or in devout and thoughtful meditation? No, indeed; but
+in walks and conversations, now with one friend, now with another, now
+round the Quadrangle of Oriel, then in Christ Church meadows; in
+fanciful, and apparently causeless, changes in his own mind, of which
+sometimes he can give the exact date, sometimes he has forgotten it, but
+which lead him out of one set of opinions into another in a helpless
+kind of way, as if he knew of no motive power but the influence of other
+men's minds or the momentary and fitful fluctuations of a spirit ever
+too much given to introspection to maintain a steady and uniform course.
+
+What a contrast between the downright, manly straightforwardness of a
+Ruskin and the fluttering, uncertain flights of a Newman, ending in the
+cold, dead fixity of the Roman faith, whereof to doubt is to be damned!
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER V
+
+
+The next paragraph to the last in this letter, contains a statement
+which at first might seem to be rashly expressed. But I was not long in
+apprehending that when Mr. Ruskin alludes to a scheme of pardon "for
+which we are supposed to be thankful, not to the Father, but to the
+Son," he was far from impugning that doctrine of the Atonement in which,
+as it is generally understood among Christian people, the whole plan of
+salvation centres.
+
+But there seems to have been a fatality about this sentence. Numbers
+have read it and commented upon it, myself amongst the number, as if Mr.
+Ruskin were here expressing _his own view_; instead of which, he is here
+quoting other men's opinions, to condemn them with severity. The
+_Record_ called it some of Mr. Ruskin's dross; but it is other people's
+dross, for which he would offer us pure gold.
+
+I happened, a very short time previous to receiving this letter, to have
+had my attention attracted by the following passage of Mr. Ruskin's
+own:--"When, in the desert, He was girding Himself for the work of life,
+angels of life came and ministered to Him; now, in the fair world, when
+He is girding Himself for the work of death [at the Transfiguration],
+the ministrants came to Him from the grave. But from the grave
+conquered. One from that tomb under Abarim, which His own hand had
+sealed long ago; the other from the rest which He had entered without
+seeing corruption."
+
+Pleased with the truthful eloquence of this passage, I placed it at the
+head of the chapter on the Transfiguration in my book on the Life and
+Work of Christ (still in the press). Having done so, it struck me that
+Mr. Ruskin, whether intentionally or undesignedly, had made the pronoun
+"His" to apply either to God the Father, or to God the Son. It may
+grammatically refer to either. From this I drew the conclusion which I
+expressed in a short letter to my friend, that, discarding the strictly
+human uses of language, which, from its unavoidable poverty, lacks the
+power of marking the true nature of the difference between the Divine
+Persons of the Holy Trinity, he had spoken of the Father and of the Son
+indiscriminately or indifferently, _i.e._, without a difference.
+
+And so it really is. How shall a man, though at the highest he be "but a
+little lower than the angels," know and comprehend the Godhead in its
+true and exact nature? The names father and son express an earthly
+relation perfectly well understood when belonging to ourselves, but when
+applied to the Supreme Divine Being, they must of necessity fall far
+short of expressing their true connexion with one another. They are,
+when applied to Heavenly beings, merely anthropomorphic terms used in
+compassion to our infirmities, and conveying to us only an approximation
+to the ideas intended. We say the Father sent the Son; the Son suffered
+for our sins. But since Father and Son are One, we are plainly
+expressing something short of the exact state of the case when we speak
+of our thankfulness to the Son as if we had no reason to be equally
+thankful to the Father.
+
+The Athanasian Creed makes no great demand upon our mental powers when
+it requires of us, in speaking of the Trinity, neither to confound the
+Persons nor to divide the Substance; for, in truth, I suppose we are
+equally incapable of doing either.
+
+These are Divine matters, of which, while the simplest may know enough,
+the wisest can never fathom the whole depth. For the Divine power and
+love, knowledge and compassion, will never be fully comprehended until
+we know even as we are known.
+
+But, as I am abstaining from questioning Mr. Ruskin as to his meaning in
+any passage, if it happens to be slightly obscure, awaiting his reply at
+the close of the book, I may here say that I believe that this sentence
+refers to a wild and unscriptural kind of preaching, happily becoming
+less common, in which undue stress is laid upon the wrathfulness of God,
+as contrasted with the mercy of the Saviour, as if we had only the Son
+to thank, and not our loving Father in Heaven, for the blessed hope of
+eternal life. Some there are, and always will be, who habitually err in
+not rightly dividing the Word of God, and giving undue prominence to a
+dark portion of doctrine, which is true enough in itself, but would be
+relieved of much of its gloom, if due prominence were given to other
+parts of the truth of God.
+
+I do not mean to praise caution at the expense of courage. I have a
+constitutional aversion to that caution allied to timidity and cowardice
+which prompts a man to look to his safety, comfort, and worldly repute
+as the first social law that concerns _him_. I admire rather the brave
+man who is ready to sacrifice all that, if he can, by so doing, gain the
+desired right end.
+
+But in the case before us, it is not so. Men talk as if all we had to do
+to convert a sinner from the error of his way was to give him a good
+talking, forgetting that we have not a plastic material to work upon,
+but a most stubborn and intractable one, wherever interest is concerned;
+and that a bold bad man is generally proof against talk, and yields to
+no power but the grace of God exercised directly, and seconded by His
+heavy judgments. Have we not all seen, with shame and astonishment, the
+"wicked rich" regularly in their places at church, much oftener than the
+"wicked poor," who have less interest in playing the hypocrite? And
+have we not felt our utter powerlessness, whether by public preaching or
+by private monition, to find a way to those case-hardened hearts? What
+are we to do with such a man as Tennyson describes in "Sea Dreams," who
+
+ "began to bloat himself, and ooze
+ All over with the fat affectionate smile
+ That makes the widow lean;"
+
+when his victim--
+
+ "Pursued him down the street, and far away,
+ Among the honest shoulders of the crowd,
+ Read rascal in the motions of his back,
+ And scoundrel in the supple-sliding knee."
+
+Here is all that we can do--told us in the last sweet lines:--
+
+ "'She sleeps: let us too, let all evil, sleep.
+ He also sleeps--another sleep than ours.
+ He can do no more wrong: forgive him, dear,
+ And I shall sleep the sounder!'
+ Then the man,
+ 'His deeds yet live, the worst is yet to come;
+ Yet let your sleep for this one night be sound:
+ I do forgive him.'
+ 'Thanks, my love,' she said,
+ 'Your own will be the sweeter;' and they slept."
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER VI
+
+
+As is the manner of our friend, he concludes a letter which was begun
+with thoughtful wisdom, with a proposal which, if gravely made, will
+seem to most of us both unpractical and impracticable.
+
+Very forcible and very true is the emphatic declaration here made of the
+deep, perhaps unpardonable sinfulness of taking in vain the holy name of
+God.
+
+But, to my mind, the irremediable fault in the latter proposition in
+this letter is the assumption that every honest clergyman of average
+capacity, and of ordinary experience of life, is, of course, wise enough
+to discern men's characters and to judge them with that unerring
+sagacity that will enable him to pronounce without favour or distinction
+of persons the severe sentence: "You shall not enter this house of God.
+I interdict your presence here. The comforts and privileges of religion
+are for other than thou. I deny thee the prayers, the preaching, and the
+sacraments of the Church." More briefly--"I excommunicate thee."
+
+Even in the case of a very bad man this would be found impossible to
+accomplish without the direst danger to the clergyman's usefulness and
+influence, to say nothing of his peace. For our experience abundantly
+shows that let a bad man but be audacious, and even ruffianly enough,
+helped by his position, he will always find plenty of support among the
+powerful and influential. The poor and honest clergyman, if he has
+attempted to enforce Church discipline, will be gravely rebuked for his
+want of charity, for his sad lack of discretion or tact, for his utter
+want of worldly wisdom; he will very soon find, to use the familiar
+phrase, the place too hot for him, and he may be thankful if he escapes
+with some small remainder of respect or compassion from the
+nobler-minded of his flock, who are always in a very small minority.
+
+I know not how it really was in the time when the rubrics of the
+Communion Services were framed. One would think, judging from these,
+that the clergyman possessed unlimited power to judge and punish with
+spiritual deprivation, and that he was alone to unite in himself all the
+various offices of accuser and police, counsel, jury, and judge. We are
+required to say every Ash Wednesday that we regret the loss of the godly
+discipline of the Primitive Church--under which, "at the beginning of
+Lent, all such persons as stood convicted of notorious sin were put to
+open penance; and that it is much to be wished that the said discipline
+may be restored again." But few can seriously view a realization of that
+wish without fear for the certain consequences.
+
+The truth is, the world moves on. Human nature may remain the same; but
+the laws and usages of society are subject to changes which it is
+useless to withstand. At the present day, great, rather too great,
+perhaps, are the claims of _charity_. We are told to hope for the best
+in the worst of cases; we are to forgive all, even the still hardened
+and unrepenting; we are to smile upon heresy and schism; we are to treat
+the rude, the churlish, the hard of heart, amidst our flocks, as if we
+had the greatest regard for them! I am not prepared to say that this is
+in every way to be regretted; for these are errors that lean perhaps to
+virtue's side. But I certainly do think that often a little more
+fearlessness in rebuking vice would not come amiss.
+
+But, on the other hand, suppose for a moment the clergy to have the
+undisputed power to bar out both the wicked rich and the wicked poor
+from their churches, this power would be of very little use; nay, it
+would be full of mischief and danger, without a sound judgment, a
+fearless spirit, and a heart little used to the melting mood. The
+clergy, as a class, may perhaps be a trifle superior to the laity in
+moral character, in spiritual knowledge, and in judgment in dealing with
+people, because their profession has early trained (or at any rate,
+ought to have trained) them in the constant and imperative exercise of
+self-examination and self-control, and the careful discernment of
+character in their intercourse with men. But that superiority, if it
+exists at all, is so trifling as to make very little impression on the
+laity, who would naturally be ready at any step to dispute the wisdom or
+expediency of the judicial acts of the clergy.
+
+Further, again: given both the wisdom to judge and the power to doom,
+would it be desirable to establish a rule that the open and notorious
+sinner (though there would always be differences of opinion upon what he
+really is, even among the clergy themselves) should be prevented from
+coming where he might, above all other places, be most likely to hear
+words that would touch his heart and bring him to a better mind? From
+the pulpit, words of counsel, of holy doctrine, and of heart-stirring
+precepts of the Gospel, fall with a power and weight which are rarely to
+be found in private conversations. Many an open and notorious sinner has
+first yielded up his heart to God under the powerful influence of
+preaching. When Jesus sat in the Pharisee's house, all the publicans and
+sinners drew near to hear Him; and the orthodox sinners, the Pharisees,
+made bitter complaints that He received and ate with the scorned and
+rejected sinners. God forbid that the day should ever come when
+spiritual pride and exclusiveness shall shut out even the hardest of
+sinners from the house of God; for who can tell where or when the word
+may be spoken which shall break the stony heart, and replace it with the
+tender heart of flesh, soon to be filled with love and devotion to God
+the Saviour and Redeemer?
+
+But, as this is a subject of great importance, may I also say a word in
+support of Mr. Ruskin's own view that the wicked should be discouraged,
+or even forbidden, to enter the house of God? We have 2 Cor. vi. 14-18,
+which seems to point out that, in the primitive Church, the wicked were
+not allowed in the assemblies of the faithful. And we remember David's
+"I have hated the congregation of evil doers, and will not sit with the
+wicked" (Psalm xxvi. 5). Is not Mr. Ruskin, perhaps, after all, only
+advocating a return to primitive usage?
+
+Mr. Ruskin says in the Preface to his selected works: "What I wrote on
+religion was painstaking, and I think forcible, as compared with most
+religious writing; especially in its frankness and fearlessness."
+Unfortunately he adds, "But it was wholly mistaken."[14] He is still
+equally outspoken, frank, and fearless; but what he wrote upon religion,
+as far as I know it, in the days which he now condemns, will live and do
+good, as long as the noble English language, of which he is one of the
+greatest masters, lives to convey to distant generations the great
+thoughts of the sons that are her proudest boast.
+
+ [14] "Sesame and Lilies," p. iii., 1876.
+
+
+
+
+ ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON THE CENSURES OF THE CHURCH.
+
+ BY THE EDITOR.
+
+
+Since writing my notes on Letter VI., in which Mr. Ruskin gives such
+vehement expression to his desire to see the ancient discipline of the
+Church restored, I have in conversation with himself learned this to be
+one of the objects he has most at heart in writing these letters; and I
+have also read in the Life of Bishop Selwyn, by the Rev. H. W. Tucker
+(vol. i., p. 241) that admirable prelate's view of this disregarded
+question. I believe Selwyn to have been the greatest uninspired
+missionary since the days of St. Paul (if indeed we can with truth
+consider so great a man wholly uninspired). But the great Bishop of the
+South Seas, in the charge from which copious extracts are there given,
+distinctly recommends the revival of spiritual discipline and the
+censures of the Church upon unrepenting offenders. He refers for
+authority to apostolic example and precept, and to the discipline
+rubrics of the Communion Service, and adds the undeniable fact that our
+Anglican communion is the only branch of the Christian Church where such
+discipline is wanting.
+
+I must ask leave to refer my readers to Mr. Tucker's book for the
+grounds in detail of the Bishop's wishes. I am not aware that any
+English prelate has ventured upon so hazardous an experiment; one, I
+should rather say, so certain to fail disastrously. The infancy of the
+Christian Church, and the Divine guidance directly exercised, rendered
+such discipline in the first centuries both practicable and
+effective.[15] But I do not remember that any parish priest of the
+Reformed Church has ever attempted to enforce the Communion rubrics,
+except, as we have learned from the public papers, in recent times, with
+disastrous consequences to the promoters. And what kind of wickedness is
+to be so visited? To prove drunkenness, or impurity, or fraudulent
+practices, or false doctrine (Canon 109), a judicial inquiry must be
+resorted to. Rebukes for lesser offences would certainly lead to
+disputes, if not even to recrimination! The irresistible circumstances
+of the age would entirely defeat any such endeavours. In towns,
+parochial limits are practically unknown or ignored, and families, or
+individuals, attend whatever church or chapel they please, no one
+preventing them, thus making all exercise of sacerdotal authority
+impracticable. In the country, even where only the parish church is
+within reach, it is highly probable that an offender would meet priestly
+excommunication by the easy expedient of cutting himself off from
+communication with his clergyman and his church; and even if he did not,
+it would be a very new state of things if the sentence were received
+with submission on the part of the offender, and acquiescence on that of
+the congregation.
+
+ [15] As these sheets are passing through the press, I happen to
+ meet with these words of Bishop Wilberforce:--"The more I have
+ thought over the matter, the more it seems to me that it was
+ providentially intended that discipline, in the strictest sense of
+ that word, should be the restraint of the early Church, and that it
+ should gradually die out as the Church approached maturity, or
+ rather turn from a formal and external rule to an inner work in the
+ spirit--should run into the opening of God's Word and its
+ application to the individual soul and life."--_Life_, vol. i., p.
+ 230.
+
+In short, the thing is simply impossible; and I do not find that even
+Bishop Selwyn himself visited immorality with ecclesiastical censures,
+or supported his clergy in doing so; and I am using the word
+"immorality" in its full and proper sense, and not with that restricted
+meaning which confines it to a particular sin. It is true, as he says,
+that our Church stands alone in refraining from the exercise of such
+power. But in other religious bodies, the discretionary power to use
+such dangerous weapons is not left to individuals however gifted. It
+rests in a constituted body, on whom the whole responsibility would lie.
+But the isolation of the English clergyman in his church and parish
+forbids him thus to risk his whole usefulness and his social existence.
+Who would confirm him in his judgment? Who would stand by him in the
+troubles which he would assuredly entail upon himself? Would his
+churchwardens, his rural dean, his archdeacon, or his bishop? I think
+there would be little comfort to be found in any of these quarters.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER VII
+
+
+Excellent as is Canon Gray's letter (p. 169), I do not at all concur in
+his somewhat severe censure on the second paragraph in this letter, in
+which Mr. Ruskin, as I conceive, with complete theological accuracy,
+points out how in His human nature our Lord accepted and received some,
+perhaps many, of the deficiencies of our nature, human frailty and
+weakness, even human _liability_ to sin, without, however, once yielding
+to its temptations. I have everywhere in my "Life of Christ" endeavoured
+to give reasons for my faith in this view, which, even if held, I know
+is not often professed.
+
+If Christ had been perfectly insensible to the allurements of sin, where
+would be His fellow-feeling with us? It would be a mere outward
+semblance; nor would there then be any significance in the statement
+that "He was in all points tempted like as we are," if He had been able
+to view with calm indifference the inducements presented to Him from
+time to time to abandon His self-sacrificing work and consult His
+safety. The captain is not to go securely armour-plated into the fight
+while the private soldier marches in his usual unprotected apparel. Nor
+will the Captain of our salvation protect Himself against the dangers
+which He invites us to encounter. If He knew nothing of sin from
+experience of its power, how could He be an example to us? Therefore I
+believe Mr. Ruskin to be perfectly right in affirming that in the words
+of Jesus we listen not to one speaking entirely in the Power and Wisdom
+of God, but to the Son of Man, bowed down, but not conquered, by
+afflictions, firm and unbending in His great purpose to bear in His own
+body the sin of the world--Son of Man, yet God Incarnate.
+
+Nor does it seem to me "a hard way of speaking" when Mr. Ruskin rightly
+and plainly affirms the perfect humanity of Christ, which, however,
+Canon Gray correctly points out to be assumed and borne in accordance
+with His own will as perfect God. I am afraid that, good and kind as he
+is, it is Canon Gray himself who is a little hard in unconsciously
+imputing thoughts which had no existence in the writer's mind!
+
+I cannot help being amused at the gravity with which certain critics
+shake their heads ominously over the last paragraph in this letter, and
+seriously ask, What can Mr. Ruskin mean by the "peace and joy in the
+Holy Ghost" enjoyed by the birds? The Poet Laureate would hardly care to
+be brought to book for each poetical flight with which he charms his
+many appreciative readers, and to be asked to explain exactly what he
+means by each of those noble thoughts which are only revealed from soul
+to soul, and dissolve into fluid, like the beautiful brittle-star of our
+coasts, under the touch of a too curious hand.
+
+How do we know but that the animal existence of these charming
+companions of our quiet hours is not accompanied by a spiritual
+existence too, as much inferior to our own spiritual state as their
+corporeal to ours? And therefore shall we boldly dare to say that they
+perish altogether and for ever? We may neither believe nor disbelieve in
+matters kept so completely secret from us. But we must be pardoned for
+leaning to a belief that the feathered creatures which spend most of
+their brief life in singing loud praises to the loving Creator and Giver
+of all good, do not live quite for nothing beyond the dissolution of
+their little frames. There are no means of ascertaining this by
+scientific experiments, or even by the most ingenious processes of
+induction carefully recorded and duly referred to as occasion may arise.
+But certainly it is a harmless fancy which many have indulged in before
+Mr. Ruskin, without being charged with such unsoundness in doctrine as
+denying the Personality of the Holy Ghost! By-and-by it may be found
+that what men have believed in half in sport will be realized wholly in
+earnest. Just outside the churchyard wall of Ecclesfield may be seen (at
+least I saw it a few years ago) a little monumental stone to a favourite
+dog, with the text, "Thou, Lord, preservest man and beast." And in
+Kingsley's "Prose Idylls" I have just met most _àpropos_ with the
+following beautiful passage, which many will read with pleasure, perhaps
+some with profit:--
+
+ "If anyone shall hint to us that we and the birds may have sprung
+ originally from the same type; that the difference between our
+ intellect and theirs is one of degree, and not of kind, we may
+ believe or doubt: but in either case we shall not be greatly moved.
+ 'So much the better for the birds,' we will say, 'and none the
+ worse for us. You raise the birds towards us: but you do not lower
+ us towards them.' What we are, we are by the grace of God. Our own
+ powers and the burden of them we know full well. It does not lessen
+ their dignity or their beauty in our eyes to hear that the birds of
+ the air partake, even a little, of the same gifts of God as we. Of
+ old said St. Guthlac in Crowland, as the swallows sat upon his
+ knee, 'He who leads his life according to the will of God, to him
+ the wild deer and the wild birds draw more near;' and this new
+ theory of yours may prove St. Guthlac right. St. Francis, too--he
+ called the birds his brothers. Whether he was correct, either
+ theologically or zoologically, he was plainly free from that fear
+ of being mistaken for an ape, which haunts so many in these modern
+ times. Perfectly sure that he himself was a spiritual being, he
+ thought it at least possible that birds might be spiritual beings
+ likewise, incarnate like himself in mortal flesh; and saw no
+ degradation to the dignity of human nature in claiming kindred
+ lovingly with creatures so beautiful, so wonderful, who (as he
+ fancied in his old-fashioned way) praised God in the forest, even
+ as angels did in heaven. In a word, the saint, though he was an
+ ascetic, and certainly no man of science, was yet a poet, and
+ somewhat of a philosopher; and would possibly--so do extremes
+ meet--have hailed as orthodox, while we hail as truly scientific,
+ Wordsworth's great saying--
+
+ 'Therefore am I still
+ A lover of the meadows and the woods
+ And mountains; and of all that we behold
+ From this green earth; of all the mighty world
+ Of eye and ear--both what they half create,
+ And what perceive; well pleased to recognize
+ In Nature and the language of the sense,
+ The anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse,
+ The guide, the guardian of my heart, and soul
+ Of all my moral being.'"
+
+ _Charm of Birds._
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER VIII
+
+
+What generous and enlightened spirit will not be stirred to its
+innermost depths by these words, burning as they are with a
+well-grounded indignation?
+
+I dare say some of the clergy will have a word to say on their claim to
+the priesthood as implying a sacrificial and mediatorial character. On
+this point I will say nothing at present.
+
+But it is an awfully solemn consideration put before us here, whether
+instead of the pure blessings and the bright countenances intended to
+be ours, our accursed blessings and defiled faces are not the natural
+consequences of our wilful misunderstanding of what the will of the Lord
+is.
+
+"Thy will be done" is a petition which can be offered up in two quite
+distinct senses. In the one, it is an expression of resignation to the
+Father's afflictive dispensations; in the other, the heartfelt desire to
+work out the revealed will of God in all the many-sided aspects of life.
+In the first sense, when sorrow or death has entered our door, our first
+impulse, if we are Christians, is to give evidence of, and expression
+to, our resignation by recognizing the _will of God_. Hence Mr. Ruskin
+interposes: "Are you so sure that it _was_ the will of God that your
+child should die, or that you should have got into that trouble?" I look
+in my local paper in the column of deaths, and see in a neighbouring
+large town how extraordinary a proportion of deaths are those of
+children. I have taken occasional cemetery duty in one of the busiest
+centres of industry in Yorkshire, and was shocked at the large numbers
+of funerals in white. Am I to believe it was the _will of God_ that so
+many young children should perish, especially as I look to my own
+beautiful parish, with its sweet sea and mountain breezes mingled, where
+the deaths of children are comparatively rare? and am I not forced to
+believe that, even without the assistance of destitution--neglect and
+overcrowding, and "quieting mixtures" and ardent spirits, and kicks and
+blows have filled most of those little graves? I fear that the will of
+Satan is here being accomplished vastly to his satisfaction. And seldom
+does the Government do more than touch the fringe of these monstrous
+evils. Of course they say "We cannot interfere," or "Legislation in
+these matters is impracticable." But can we not all remember when it was
+just as certain that free trade in food was impracticable? but who does
+not see that it is saving us from famine this dark year 1879?--that
+compulsory education was revolutionary and full of unimaginable perils
+to the country, and yet who are so glad as the poor themselves, now that
+it has been carried into effect? It used to be thought that if people
+chose to kill themselves with unwholesome open drains before their
+doors, there was no power able to prevent them. But we are wiser now.
+Legislators have generally been, or chosen to appear, like cowards till
+the time for action came, very late, and then they were decided enough.
+Now let us hope that a way may be found to save infant life from
+premature extinction by wholesale.
+
+Let me use this opportunity of saying that in the letters we are now
+considering there is a feature which ought not to escape those who are
+desirous of deriving good from them; and that is that in their very
+condensed form no time is taken for explanation or expansion. Mr. Ruskin
+speaks as unto wise men, and asks us to judge for ourselves what he
+says. But my own experience, after frequent perusal of them, shows me
+that there is a vast fund of truth in them which becomes apparent only
+after patient consideration and reflection. Without desiring at all to
+bestow extravagant praise on my kind friend, or any other distinguished
+man, it is only fair and just to own that the truth that is in these
+letters shines out more and more the more closely they are examined. It
+is a gift that God has given him, which has cost him far more pain,
+worry, and vexation, through all kinds of wilful and envious, as well as
+innocent and unconscious misrepresentation, than ever it has gained him
+of credit or renown.
+
+This principle leads me to view _now_ with approbation what I could not
+read at first without an unpleasant feeling. The sentence: "Nearly the
+whole Missionary body (with the hottest Evangelical section of the
+English Church) is at this moment composed of men who think the Gospel
+they are to carry to mend the world with, forsooth, is this, 'If any man
+sin, he hath an Advocate with the Father.'" And when I first read it to
+my reverend brethren, hard words were spoken of this passage, because in
+its terseness, in its elliptic form, it easily allows itself to be
+misunderstood. Yet the paragraph contains the essence of the Gospel
+expressed with a faithful boldness not often met with in pulpit
+addresses.
+
+"If any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father." We have here a
+solemn and momentous truth, expressed in few words, as clearly and as
+briefly as any geometrical definition. But is this _all_ the Gospel?
+Will this alone "mend the world, forsooth"? Now the extreme men of one
+particular school in the English Church do really preach little else
+beside this. When they are entreated to preach upon good works, too, and
+unfold a little of their value and beauty,--if they have any at
+all,--the answer is always to the effect, "Oh, of course; faith in
+Christ must of necessity beget the love of good works. These are the
+signs of that. Preach Christ crucified, and all the rest will be sure to
+follow." And this is what is exclusively called "preaching the Gospel."
+The preacher who teaches us to love our enemies, to live pure lives, to
+be honourable to all men and women, to bring up our families in the
+truth, is frowned upon as a "legal preacher." As a clergyman myself, I
+am not afraid of saying that I look upon this so-called Gospel-preaching
+as fraught with not a little of danger. God knows, wicked sinners are
+found in every congregation and class of men, kneeling to pray, and
+singing praises, exactly like good men. Now I can hardly conceive a
+style and matter of preaching more calculated to excuse and palliate,
+and almost encourage sin, than this narrow and exclusive so-called
+Gospel-preaching. Neither Christ nor His apostles taught thus at all.
+The whole Sermon on the Mount is moral in the highest and purest sense.
+Every epistle has its moral or _legal_ side. "Woe is me if I preach not
+the Gospel!" and I cannot be preaching the Gospel unless, along with the
+great proclamation, "If any man sin, we have an Advocate with the
+Father," I also do my utmost to teach "what the will of the Lord is"
+concerning a pure, holy, and blameless life, full of active, good works,
+done in deep humility and self-abasement; because Christ loved me and
+died for me, and asks me, in love to Him, to walk in His steps.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER IX
+
+
+I fancy I can still hear the murmur of angry dissent pass round as I
+read to my reverend brethren this indignant plea for a higher
+interpretation of the petition for daily bread than that which passes
+current with the unthinking, self-indulgent world. Nevertheless, this
+manifestation of feeling was not general, and I thoroughly agree with
+Mr. Ruskin that the world has, from the first, used this prayer
+thoughtlessly and blasphemously; and probably will continue to do so to
+the end, when the thoughts and imaginations of all men's hearts shall be
+revealed, and no more disguises shall be possible; when the masked
+hypocrite's smile shall be torn from him and reveal the covetousness
+that breeds in his heart to its core; when the honourable man shall no
+longer be confounded with thieves, nor the usurer and extortioner be
+courted and bowed to like an honest man.
+
+The veil that hid the true Christ, as Mr. Ruskin has well remarked, was
+removed in the breaking of bread with the disciples at Emmaus. As the
+Master, so the true disciples. They too may be known both by the
+spiritual breaking of the Bread of Life in the Holy Communion (though
+the canting hypocrite too may be found polluting that holy rite); but
+more especially in the union of the sacred ordinance with obedience to
+the scarcely less sacred command of Christian love and charity to the
+poor. There may be the empty profession, but there will be none of the
+reality of the religion of the Gospel, unless we are partakers of the
+bread broken at the Lord's Table, or unless we eat the bread earned by
+the honest labour of our hands or of our brains, or share some of our
+bread with those, the Lord's brethren, whom He has left for us to care
+for in His name. The absence of either of these three essential
+conditions just lays us open to the charge of flaunting before the world
+a false and spurious Christianity. In the plain words of our friend, our
+bread not being fairly got or fairly used, is stolen bread.
+
+But I would willingly believe that it is only by a strong figure of
+speech that we clergy are here again emphatically called upon to act the
+part of inquisitors by pointedly demanding of every member of our flock
+a precise account of the manner in which he earns his livelihood. Still,
+if the answer was not a surprised and indignant stare, I believe the
+great mass of men would probably be able to give an answer which should
+abundantly satisfy themselves and us, until Mr. Ruskin threw his own
+light upon the answer and demonstrated that the notions of modern
+civilized society are not in accordance with the highest teaching.
+According to our ideas, the artisan, the tradesman, the merchant, the
+members of the learned and the military and naval professions, all those
+engaged in the various departments of government work, from the cabinet
+minister down to the last office clerk,--all these use the labour of
+body or of mind, and in return receive the necessaries or the luxuries
+of life for themselves and their households. Men who are, if they
+please, exempt altogether from such labour, as large landed proprietors,
+are certainly under a temptation to lead a life of ease and leisure. But
+it is very seldom that we are offended with the sight of a landlord so
+unmindful of social duties as to take no personal active interest in the
+welfare and conduct of his tenants, or forgetful of the responsibilities
+to his country imposed upon him by his rank and position.
+
+It is to be hoped that Mr. Ruskin does not in all solemn seriousness
+really expect that after a fair examination of the modes of life of all
+these people, "an entirely new view of life and its sacraments will
+open upon us and them." Is it indeed a fact that "the great mass of men
+calling themselves Christians do actually live by robbing the poor of
+their bread, and by no other trade whatsoever"? Mr. Ruskin is always
+terribly in earnest in whatever he says, and we must look for an
+explanation of this sentence in the very decided views he holds upon
+interest of money, which he calls usury.
+
+Mr. Ruskin classes Usury and Interest together. Here are some of his
+strong words upon this subject: "There is absolutely no debate possible
+as to what usury is, any more than what adultery is. The Church has only
+been polluted by indulgence in it since the 16th century. Usury is any
+kind whatever of interest on loan, and it is the essential modern force
+of Satan." This was written September 9th of this year. In "Fors
+Clavigera," Letter lxxxii., p. 323, he challenged the Bishop of
+Manchester to answer him the question, whether he considered "usury to
+be a work of the Lord"?[16] In the same letter, to place his heavy
+denunciation against the wickedness of usury in the best possible
+company, he pleads: "Plato's scheme was impossible even in his own
+day,--as Bacon's New Atlantis in _his_ day,--as Calvin's reform in _his_
+day,--as Goethe's Academe in his; but of the good there was in all these
+men, the world gathered what it could find of evil."
+
+ [16] See _Contemporary Review_, February 1880.
+
+Let us look a little closer into this matter. It is not because a man
+with fearless frankness breasts the full torrent of popular persuasion
+and universal practice that he is to be thrust aside as a fanatic, with
+hard words and unfeeling sneers concerning his sanity. Here, again, I
+avow my persuasion that Mr. Ruskin is, in one sense, too far in advance,
+and, in another, too far in the rear of the time; and while I attempt an
+explanatory justification of the modern practice, I admit that it is
+only "for the hardness of our hearts" and because the golden age is
+still far off.
+
+The Mosaic law was severe against usury and increase, forbidding it
+under heavy threatenings among the faithful Israelites, but allowing it
+in lending to strangers. "If thy brother be waxen poor, then thou shalt
+relieve him ... take thou no usury of him, or increase" (Lev. xxv. 35,
+36). "Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money,
+usury of victuals, usury of anything that is lent upon usury. _Unto a
+stranger_ thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt
+not lend upon usury" (Deut. xxiii. 19, 20). "Lord, who shall abide in
+Thy tabernacle? ... He that putteth not out his money to usury" (Psalm
+xv. 1, 5. See Ezek. xviii. 7, etc.) And to come to the Christian law, we
+have the mild general principle: "If ye lend to them of whom ye hope to
+receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to
+receive as much again.... Lend, hoping for nothing again, and your
+reward shall be great" (Luke vi. 34, 35).
+
+So far the Law of Moses and the Gospel.
+
+But our Lord, in the Parable of the Talents, appears to actually
+sanction the practice of loans upon interest: "Thou oughtest, therefore,
+to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should
+have received mine own with usury" (Matt. xxv. 27). The preceding verse,
+the 26th, may well be understood to be a question--Didst thou indeed
+think so? It does not even indirectly attribute hardness and oppression
+to our Lord.[17] I am quite aware that it may be replied that this is an
+instance of those strong audacious metaphors, where the fact used by way
+of illustration is instinctively overleaped by the mind of the hearer to
+arrive at the lesson which it marks and emphasizes; as when the Lord is
+represented as an unjust judge, or Paul speaks of grafting the wild
+olive branch upon the good, or James refers to the rust and canker upon
+gold and silver, or Milton speaks of certain bishops as "blind
+mouths."[18] But in all these cases, the hyperbole is manifest; it is an
+untruth or a disguise, which not only does not deceive, but teaches a
+great truth. Our Lord's reference to money-lenders or exchangers appears
+to lend an indirect sanction to a familiar practice.
+
+ [17] The owners of five talents and of two talents are commended
+ for making cent. per cent. of their money; but the man who hid away
+ his one talent, as French peasants do, and brought it to his Lord
+ untouched and undiminished, received a severe rebuke.
+
+ [18] Lycidas. See "Sesame and Lilies," p. 27.
+
+The Law of Moses, therefore, rebuking the practice of lending for
+increase among brethren and encouraging it in dealing with strangers,
+combined with the well-known avarice of the Jews to make them
+money-lenders on a large scale, and at high rates of interest, to the
+prodigals and spendthrifts, the bankrupt barons and needy sovereigns of
+the middle ages. Money was rarely lent for commercial purposes, and to
+advance the real prosperity of the borrower. It was generally to stave
+off want for the time; and principal and interest, when pay-day came,
+had generally to be found in the pastures or strongholds of the enemy.
+High interest was charged, on account of the extraordinary
+precariousness of what was called the security. Grinding and grasping
+undoubtedly the money-lenders would be, from the hardship of their case.
+Reckless extravagance and lavish profusion were, in those non-commercial
+ages, highly applauded. The spendthrift and the prodigal was the
+favourite of the multitude; the rich money-lender was hated and abused,
+while his money-bags were sought after with all the eagerness of
+hard-driving poverty. They reviled the careful and economical Israelite;
+they looked with horror upon his vast accumulations of capital, and
+never remembered to thank him for the safety they owed to him from the
+violent hands of their own soldiers and retainers.
+
+All this went on until the sixteenth or seventeenth century. I have
+before me a very curious old book, lent to me by Mr. Ruskin, entitled,
+"The English Usurer: or, Usury Condemned by the most learned and famous
+Divines of the Church of England. Collected by John Blaxton, Preacher of
+God's Word at Osmington, in Dorsetshire, 1634."
+
+The language throughout the book is of extreme violence against all
+manner of usury. The compiler gives a collection of the most emphatic
+testimonies of the greatest preachers of the day against this
+"detestable vice." Bishop Jewell calls it "a most filthy trade, a trade
+which God detesteth, a trade which is the very overthrow of all
+Christian love." There is, it must be admitted, no sort of argument
+attempted in the long extract from Bishop Jewell's sermon to demonstrate
+the wickedness of the practice against which he launches his fierce
+invectives, but he certainly brings his sermon to a conclusion with a
+threat of extreme measures "if they continue therein. I will open their
+shame and denounce excommunication against them, and publish their names
+in this place before you all, that you may know them, and abhor them as
+the plagues and monsters of this world; that if they be past all fear of
+God, they may yet repent and amend for worldly shame."
+
+This was Bishop Jewell preaching in the middle of the 16th century; and
+such were the strong terms very generally employed by good and
+thoughtful men at that day. Bacon (Essay 41) says that one of the
+objections against usury is that "it is against nature for money to
+beget money!" Antonio, in "The Merchant of Venice," asks:
+
+ "When did friendship take
+ A _breed_ of barren metal of his friend?"
+
+And his practice was "neither to lend nor borrow by taking nor giving of
+excess," which brought upon him the malice and vindictiveness of the
+Jew--
+
+ "that in low simplicity
+ He lends out money gratis, and brings down
+ The rate of usance here with us in Venice."
+
+Philip, in Tennyson's "Brook "--a simple man in later times--
+
+ "Could not understand how money breeds,
+ Thought it a dead thing."
+
+But there were men, too, who saw that the taking of moderate interest
+was a blameless act. Calvin was a contemporary of Bishop Jewell, and his
+mind exhibits a curious mixture of feelings upon the subject. Blaxton
+triumphantly places a sentence from Calvin's "Epistola de Usura" as a
+battle-flag in his title-page:--
+
+"In republica bene constituta nemo fænerator tolerabilis est; sed omnino
+debet e consortio hominum rejici." "An usurer is not tolerable in a
+well-established Commonwealth, but utterly to be rejected out of the
+company of men." So again, in his Commentary on Deuteronomy. But again,
+in a passage quoted from the same author, without reference, in Dugald
+Stewart's Preliminary Dissertation (Encyd. Brit.) we come across a
+different view.
+
+"'Money begets not money!'--What does the sea beget? What the house for
+which I receive rent? Is silver brought forth from the walls and the
+roof? But that is produced from land, and that is drawn forth from the
+sea, which shall produce money; and the convenience of a house is paid
+for with a stipulated sum. Now if better profit can be derived from the
+letting out of money than by the letting of an estate, shall a profit be
+made by letting perhaps some barren land to a farmer, and shall it not
+be allowed to him who lends a sum of money? He who gets an estate by
+purchase, shall he not from that money derive an annual profit? Whence
+then is the merchant's profit? You will say, from his diligence and
+industry. Does anyone suppose that money ought to lie idle and
+unprofitable? He who borrows of me is not going to let the loan lie
+idle. He is not going to draw profit from the money itself, but from the
+goods bought with it. Those reasonings, therefore, against usury are
+subtle, and have a certain plausibility; but they fall as soon as they
+are examined more narrowly. I therefore conclude that we are to judge of
+usury, not from any particular passage of Scripture, but by the ordinary
+rules of justice and equity."
+
+To come at once to modern days and practical views. Let us suppose
+lending on interest forbidden by the Church and the law. Then sums of
+money required for good and legitimate business purposes must be begged
+as a great favour. No honourable man would do this. The instinctive
+repugnance felt by an independent man to place himself under pecuniary
+obligations which he could not reciprocate would stop many a promising
+young man of slender means from going to college, many a good man of
+business from using the most favourable opportunities. I am not speaking
+of borrowing money to gain temporary relief from pecuniary
+embarrassment, but of money honourably desired to realize advantages of
+apparent life-value. So the necessitous would be doomed to remain in
+hopeless necessity until some benevolently-minded person with a mass of
+loose unemployed capital came to his rescue, and such men are not to be
+met with every day.
+
+So far for the man who would like to borrow, but that the law will not
+allow it except as a free loan or gift. Then for the willing lender, if
+he dared. He has, say, a few thousands in hand, which he does not wish
+to spend. He looks round, if he is anxious to use it for good, for an
+object of his charity who seems least likely to disappoint him. Does our
+experience of human nature teach that a sense of gratitude for benefits
+received is a good security for honourable conduct? Alas! in a multitude
+of cases--I fear the majority--the lender would only be met with cold
+and alienated looks when he expected to receive his own again, if indeed
+he found anywhere at all the object of his kindness. The memory of past
+ingratitude, the fear of worse to come, would dry the sources of
+benevolence, and make the upright and honest to suffer equally with the
+swindler and the hypocrite.
+
+But there is no such fear now. The recognized system of lending upon
+approved security for a fair and moderate rate of interest removes the
+irksome, galling sense of obligation, and enables any man to borrow with
+a feeling that if he receives an obligation he is also conferring one;
+that if he makes ten per cent. by trading, or a good stipend by his
+degree, he will divide his profits fairly with the man who served him,
+and that he is helping him in his turn to keep his money together for
+the sake of his children after him. Take away these benefits, and what
+good is done by free lending? Not any that we can see with ordinary
+eyes, but a good deal of suspicion, disappointment, ingratitude, and
+loss.
+
+An honourable man would a hundred times rather accept a loan as a matter
+of profit to the lender than as a charity to himself. The right result
+of an honourable system of borrowing and lending with equal advantage to
+both, _is_ the will of God, and not contrary to sanctification. The
+result of a compulsory system of charitable loans would lead only to the
+destruction of credit and mutual confidence, and the sacrifice of a
+multitude of Christian graces and virtues.
+
+We cannot help observing with what vehemence Mr. Ruskin constantly
+thrusts the thief, the adulterer, and the usurer all into the same boat
+to be tossed against the breakers of his wrath. Now I would ask some one
+of those numerous disciples of his, whose affection almost prompts them
+to say to him, "I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest," "Pray, my
+good friend, what is your own practice? Providence has blessed you with
+ease and affluence far more than you need for daily bread. What do you
+do with your money? Of course you would never think of investing in
+consols, in railway shares, or dock-bonds, would you? you would not lend
+money upon mortgage, or exact rent for your household and landed
+property? I see that you hesitate a little; you have something to
+confess. Come! what is it?" And my amiable friend replies, "Oh, but you
+see all the world is gone after interest of money; all our mutual
+relations are so intimately bound up with that accursed, abominable
+practice, that I have no alternative. _I have_ large sums lodged in
+various safe investments, and employ an agent to collect my rents and
+settle with my tenants." And so I am forced to exclaim, "What! you who
+are persuaded that usury, and theft, and adultery, are all of equal
+blackness, if you find that one sin is unavoidable, what about the other
+two? Would you then invite the robber and the licentious to sin with
+impunity, as you practise your own convenient iniquity, with the
+applause of the world and your own acquiescence?"
+
+Positively I see no escape from this argument. It is the _argumentum ad
+hominem_,--generally an uncivil mode of address; but here, at any rate,
+it is impersonally used.
+
+These are my views frankly stated. If I am wrong, even by the highest
+standard of Christian ethics, I shall be thankful for Mr. Ruskin's
+corrections.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER X
+
+
+The letters which I have received up to the present time (October 31st)
+in reply to Mr. Ruskin's have not failed to bring me not a little of
+disappointment. On the one hand, I see a man noble and elevated in his
+aims, and with highest aspirations, desiring nothing so fervently as to
+see the world and its pastors and teachers rising to the highest
+attainable level of religious and moral excellence; fearlessly rebuking
+the evils he sees so clearly; clothing thoughts that consume him in
+words that stir our inmost hearts; and yet I see him unavoidably missing
+his aim as all men are liable to do, through the defect of possessing
+human language alone as the channel to convey divine meanings; and,
+moreover, who cannot at every turn stay the course of their reasoning to
+explain that that which they speak apparently, and from the necessities
+of language, to _all_, is, as the most ordinary apprehension would
+perceive, really addressed to _some_.
+
+On the other side, while I hear many expressing their thankfulness that
+things are now being said that "wanted saying," and are being spoken out
+with uncompromising boldness, others receive them with impatience, with
+irritation, with exasperation. I have been gravely advised to recommend
+Mr. Ruskin to withdraw these letters, to wash my hands of them, etc.
+Sometimes this arises from unfamiliarity with Mr. Ruskin's most famous
+works; sometimes from entire unacquaintance with their number and their
+nature; as when a friend wrote to me before he saw or heard a word of
+the letters:--
+
+"If Mr. Ruskin thinks we have generally read his _publication_ (_sic_)
+I think he is mistaken; all I know of _it_ is that I have occasionally
+seen _it_ quoted in newspapers, from which I gather that he holds
+peculiar opinions."
+
+A lady, who looked well to the ways of her household, but knew very
+little of books, once asked me if Mr. Ruskin had not written a book
+called the "Old Red Sandstone." I hinted that probably she meant the
+"Stones of Venice," which was indeed the case. She knew it was something
+about stones! But she was an excellent creature nevertheless!
+
+These two traits may fairly be paired together.
+
+It should be observed, by clergymen especially who read these letters
+attentively, that they contain just what we clergy ought to be told
+sometimes by laymen, to whom we preach with perfect impunity, but who as
+a rule rarely make reply. I have just read Lord Carnarvon's excellent
+address on Preaching, delivered at the Winchester Diocesan Conference,
+and thank him as I thank, and for the same reason that I thank, Mr.
+Ruskin. We need to be told wholesome though unpalatable truths
+sometimes, when we have descended from our castle-pulpits to meet, it
+may be, the eyes, and hear the voices, of impatient, irritated, and
+prejudiced critics.
+
+I do not remember that so bold an attack, and yet so friendly, has ever
+before been made upon our weak points in modern times; and I may justly
+claim for Mr. Ruskin's letters a calm, self-searching, and, if need be,
+a self-condemning and self-sacrificing, examination. We are all too apt
+to cry "Peace, peace, where there is no peace." Why should the shepherds
+of Britain claim for themselves a more indulgent regard than the
+shepherds of Israel, whom Ezekiel, by the word of the Lord, addressed in
+the 33rd and 34th chapters of his prophecy?
+
+Concerning the letter before us on the forgiveness of sins--each other's
+sins or debts, and our sins before God--it is not a question of
+theology, but of simple moral right and wrong; and I defy Mr. Ruskin's
+bitterest censors to deny, that, in this wicked world, men are more in
+earnest in deceiving, injuring, and swindling their friends than they
+are in seeking the love of their enemies. Has not our Lord told us long
+ago that "the children of this world are wiser" (that is, more earnest,
+consistent, and thorough-going) "in their generation than the children
+of light"?
+
+It is of extreme difficulty to _understand_ the clause, says Mr. Ruskin.
+Replies some slow-witted preacher: "Where is the difficulty? I both
+understand it and explain it with perfect ease!" What! understand the
+precious conditions on which forgiveness will be extended to us! The
+question of God's forgiveness is not a _simple_ question. It is
+complicated by its relation to men's mutual forgiveness of each other,
+and that again by the practical difficulty of knowing when we can, and
+when, from the very nature of the case, we cannot, forgive. Here are
+surely elements of difficulty quite sufficient to justify the remark
+that "the clause is one of such difficulty that, to understand it, means
+almost to know the love of God which passeth knowledge."
+
+But we may, at any rate, guard our people against _misunderstanding_ it;
+and they are guilty, and full of guilt, who live in sin,--sins of
+avarice, of ill temper, of calumny, of hatred, of sensuality, and of
+unforgivingness, and yet daily ask to be forgiven, because, forsooth,
+they are innocent of any bad intention!
+
+No man or woman who sins with the knowledge that it _is_ sin can have
+God's forgiveness. It is no use to plead the frailty of the flesh. It is
+wilful, knowing, deliberate sin; and it will not be forgiven without a
+very living, earnest, and working faith indeed.
+
+I question much whether we preachers of the Gospel say enough upon this
+point,--not at all that we underrate its importance, nor that we
+overrate the importance of that which we are apt to call Gospel
+preaching [Greek: kat' exochên], namely, the doctrine of the atonement
+by the Blood of Christ, which is the brightness and glory of the Gospel
+message, but is no more all of it than that the sum of the Lord's Prayer
+is contained in one of its clauses.
+
+"As we forgive them that trespass against us." Shall I be pardoned for
+venturing here upon a remark which seems needful to make in the presence
+of so much that appears to be erroneous on the subject of human
+forgiveness? And it is more especially necessary to be understood in
+the case of the clergy, because such large demands are made upon their
+forgiveness as it is impossible to satisfy. I do not at all say that
+there are trespasses which men cannot forgive,--sins, I mean, of the
+ordinary type, and not crimes. But I do say that there are times and
+circumstances under which forgiveness is a moral impossibility. And yet
+the world expects a clergyman to be ever walking up and down in society
+with forgiveness on his lips and forgiveness in both his hands. Our Lord
+said, "If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and _if he
+repent_, forgive him" (Luke xvii. 3); and forgiveness is to follow each
+successive profession of repentance. And in Matt. xviii. 22, though
+repentance is not named, it is manifestly implied. In 2 Cor. ii. 7,
+again, sorrow for the sin is a condition of forgiveness. This, then, is
+the rule and condition of forgiveness, that our brother _repent_; and
+manifestly it must be so; for the act of forgiveness requires a
+correlative disposition to seek and receive forgiveness, just as a gift
+implies not only a giver but a receiver, or it cannot be a gift, do what
+we will. I think this is extremely apt to be overlooked even by the
+larger, that is, the more emotional and impulsive part of the world,
+though not, of course, by the more thoughtful; and clergymen especially
+are asked to speak fair, and sue for peace, and all but ask for
+forgiveness of those who are habitually and obstinately bent upon doing
+them all the wrong and injury in their power, and using them with the
+most intolerable harshness.
+
+What, then, does true religion require of us if such circumstances make
+forgiveness impossible? To be ever ready, ever prepared to forgive; to
+seek every opening, every avenue to peace without sacrifice of
+self-respect and manly independence; to watch for opportunities to do
+kindnesses to the most inveterate enemy,--even where a change of heart
+appears hopeless. This is possible to a Christian, and this is what
+Christ demands. But He does not demand impossibilities. He does not ask
+us to do more than our Heavenly Father Himself, who forgives the
+returning sinner even "a great way off," if his face be but homeward;
+but says nothing of forgiveness to him whose back is towards his home,
+and whose heart dwells far away.
+
+I am sure Mr. Ruskin does not mean that no clergyman is sensible of the
+guilt of sins of omission. But he is speaking as a layman, who has heard
+in his time a great many preachers, and it is very probable indeed that
+he has not heard many dwell long and forcibly on the fact, which is
+indeed a fact, that the guilt of sins of omission is the burden of
+Christ's teaching, and that more parables and more preaching are
+directed against the sin of doing nothing at all than against the
+positive and active wickedness of bad men. If we will be candid, we must
+agree with him that in our general teaching we do lay much less emphasis
+on such sins than our Lord does in _His_ teaching.
+
+But in the paragraph which follows, I confess that, following up a
+charge which is sadly too true, that there is a grotesque inconsistency
+"in the willingness of human nature to be taxed with any quantity of
+sins in the gross, and its resentment at the insinuation of having
+committed the smallest parcel of them in detail," there comes a
+sentence in which the Christian philosopher loses himself in the caustic
+satirist, and that this vein continues to the end of the letter. In
+satire, such is its very essence, truth is ever travestied. It is truth
+still, but the truth in unfamiliar, and, for the most part, unacceptable
+guise. There is just an undercurrent of truth, and no more, in the
+statement, not very seriously made, one would suppose, that the English
+Liturgy was "drawn up with the amiable intention of making religion as
+pleasant as possible, to a people desirous of saving their souls with no
+great degree of personal inconvenience."
+
+If the whole naked truth were spoken with the deepest gravity that the
+awful pressure of our sins demands, the English Liturgy would be a
+continuous wail of grief and repentance. For if anything is great, and
+loud, and urgent, it is the cry of our sins. But co-extensive with our
+sins is the love of our Father; and, therefore, our mourning is changed
+into rejoicing and thankfulness, and this picture of the sinner
+"dexterously concealing the manner of his sin from man, and
+triumphantly confessing the quantity of it to God," is merely a satire.
+
+The next paragraph is more bitter still; but happily for the cause of
+sober truth, it is satire again; and nothing can be more obvious than
+the fact that prayer, to be Common Prayer, cannot at the same time suit
+every condition of mind, the calm and the agitated, the strained and the
+relaxed, the rejoicing and the sorrowful. But we are not dependent upon
+public worship for the satisfaction of our spiritual wants, as long as
+we can resort to private prayer and family prayer. And, indeed, it
+requires no wonderful stretch of our powers of adaptation to use the
+most strenuous private prayer in the midst of the congregation; and the
+"remorseful publican" and the "timid sinner" are not bound to the words
+before them, or if they do follow these words, I am sure there is enough
+depth in them to satisfy the views of the most conscience-stricken.
+Common Prayer is calm to the calm, and passionate to the passionate. It
+is all things to all men, just according to their frame of mind at the
+time.
+
+But alas for my good kind friend! as we get nearer to the end of the
+letter, the satire waxes fiercer, and the adherence to the truth of
+nature grows fainter. Does Mr. Ruskin seriously, or only sarcastically,
+tell us that the assaults upon the divine power of prayer gain any force
+from the circumstance that we are constrained to pray daily for
+forgiveness, never getting so far as to need it no longer? From the
+first day that we lisped at our mother's knee, "Forgive us our
+trespasses," until, bowed with age, we _still_ say, "Forgive us our
+trespasses," we have never stood, and never will stand, one day less in
+need of forgiveness than another day--or our Lord would have provided a
+thanksgiving and a prayer for the perfected.
+
+I believe everywhere else I recognize, even in the most startling
+passages, an element of truth. But in the latter half of this letter,
+not even the large amount of acrimony and severity allowed to the mode
+of address called satire can quite reconcile us to its marvellous
+asperity.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER XI
+
+
+I cannot but feel astonished and grieved at the perversity of those
+who[19] persist in looking upon Mr. Ruskin as altogether a noxious kind
+of a scribbler, and likely to do much injury by the unflagging constancy
+with which he perseveres in pointing his finger at all our weak and sore
+places. And yet it cannot be said that even if he does "lade men with
+burdens grievous to be borne," he himself "touches not the burdens with
+one of his fingers."
+
+ [19] It was but yesterday that a voice reached me from one of the
+ remotest of our Ultima Thules amongst these mountains, affirming,
+ with something like self-gratulation, that he "cared less than
+ nothing for anything Mr. Ruskin might write outside the subject of
+ Art!" Yet one of the best of our Bishops--and we have many good
+ ones--wrote by the same post: "Mr. Ruskin's letters are full of
+ suggestive thoughts, and must do anyone good, if only in getting
+ one out of the ruts." But, alas! against this I must needs set the
+ dictum of another dignitary of the Church, an intensely practical
+ man: "I have a great reverence for Mr. Ruskin's genius, and for
+ what he has written in time past, and on this account I would
+ rather not say a single word in comment upon these letters;" and
+ again--"I really could not discuss them seriously."
+
+But let us consider this last letter. Is not every word of it
+true--severely and austerely true,--but still true? But yet here still
+the fault remains (though I say it with the utmost deference,
+remembering that, after all, I have infinitely more to learn than I have
+to teach), the fault remains that the truth is put too keenly, too
+incisively, to be classed with practical truths.
+
+Yes, the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are for a perfect state in this
+life. We do pray for a Paradise upon earth, where either temptation
+shall no longer exist, or where sin shall have lost its power to injure
+by losing its power to allure. But will the most incessant prayer,
+individual, combined, or congregational, ever bring us to perfection?
+Alas! my friend, you would gladly persuade us so; you would lead the way
+yourself, but that the first half-dozen steps you take would have, or
+have long ago, proved to you that sin is ever present, even in the best
+and purest of men.
+
+I trust they are very few indeed who are so easily persuaded by the
+conceited self-sufficiency of the "scientific people" to cease from
+prayer under the belief that all things move on under the control of
+inflexible laws, which neither prayer nor the will of God, if God has a
+will, can change or modify. Magee[20] has a valuable note on the subject
+of the "Consistency of Prayer with the Divine Immutability," in which he
+puts this truth in a mathematical form. He says, "The relation of God to
+man + prayer is different from the relation of God to man - prayer. Yet
+God remains constant. It is man who is the better or the worse for
+prayer or no prayer."
+
+ [20] On the Atonement.
+
+It is pleasant to reflect that with the simple-minded Christian the
+belief in Christ, because he knows that Christ loved him and died for
+him, is exceedingly little moved by these so-called scientific doubts.
+The propounders of these entangling questions move in a region where he
+would feel cold and his life would be crushed out of him, and he
+declines to follow science at so great a cost, believing besides that
+science might often be better termed nescience, for he has no faith in
+such science. Instead of being presented with clear deductions, drawn
+from observation and experience, he sees but too plainly that, as each
+philosopher frames his own belief out of his inner consciousness, there
+cannot fail to come out a very large variety of beliefs, and that, if
+the religion of the Bible were exploded and became an obsolete thing,
+its place would be usurped by a motley crowd of infinitely varied creeds
+of every shape and hue, each claiming for itself, with more or less
+modesty and reserve, but with just equal rights, the supremacy over
+men's consciences. And in the meanwhile, women and children and the
+poor, and in fact all who are not altogether highly, transcendentally
+intellectual, must, for want of the requisite faculties and
+opportunities, do without any religion at all. I suppose most people can
+see this, and therefore will pay a very limited attention to the claims
+and pretensions of science-worship.
+
+I come to a sentence where once more the proclivity for satire breaks
+out for a minute: "But in modern days the first aim of all Christians is
+to place their children in circumstances where the temptations (which
+they are apt to call opportunities) may be as great and as many as
+possible; where the sight and promise of 'all these things' in Satan's
+gift may be brilliantly near." I was reading this from the MS. to a
+mother, accomplished and amiable, who of course thought in a moment of
+her own little flock of sons and daughters, all the objects of the
+tenderest care and solicitude; and she felt that she at least had not
+deserved this stroke. But the truth is that we must read this sentence
+as we read our Lord's, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth:
+I came not to send peace, but a sword" (Matt. x. 34). The sword was not
+the object of our Lord's coming, but the unhappy result through sin. He
+came to bring peace on earth, yet was He "set for the fall of many in
+Israel." The wisest and best of parents place their sons in the
+profession or position in life where temptations abound, not because
+they desire to see them bow before Satan, and become the possessors of
+"all these things" which he promises "I will give thee," but because
+there is no position in the active life of the world that is free from
+temptations; and those temptations are the strongest and most numerous
+often just where the real and undoubted advantages are the greatest and
+most numerous. Mr. Ruskin, with a strong and legitimate figure of
+speech, is simply putting an inevitable result as the work of apparent
+design.
+
+If the distinction between the glory and the power of the kingdom of God
+and the false lustre of earthly power and worldly allurements is not
+sufficiently dwelt upon in our pulpits, none will regret it more than
+the earnest preachers in whom the modern Church of England abounds. If
+it be granted, as I think it must be granted, that the highest wisdom is
+not always exercised in the choice and preparation of our subjects of
+preaching, every true-hearted and loyal Churchman must be grateful for
+the fearless candour of the writer of the letters we have been
+considering, in pointing out to us our prevailing deficiencies, even if
+he does not, which is not his province, point out how to attain
+perfection.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ LETTERS FROM CLERGY AND LAITY
+
+ (FROM THE FIRST EDITION)
+
+
+The following letters have been entrusted to me for publication in this
+work. The writers of twenty-two of them are clergymen, of whom sixteen
+are members of three Clerical Societies, all of whom have read their
+letters before the Societies to which they belong, except in the case of
+one Society, where it was impracticable. The remaining six have been
+kind enough to write in acceptance of the invitation in the
+_Contemporary Review_ for December, 1879. The remaining letters are from
+members of the laity, attracted by the same proposal. Many others have
+been received; but it would not have been possible to include them all
+in a volume of moderate size, some of them besides being of great
+length; and I was therefore, with regret, obliged to decline them.
+
+It was not originally intended that the invitation to discuss these
+questions should be extended to laymen. But several so understood it
+from the preface in the _Contemporary_, and when I came to examine the
+letters sent on this understanding, I felt a conviction that a true and
+safe light would be thrown upon the subject by their assistance; and,
+using the discretionary power allowed me by Mr. Ruskin, I thought it, on
+the whole, best to give admission to a certain number of communications
+from laymen.
+
+Besides, as they themselves are, in great measure, the subjects of the
+discussion, and, therefore, must feel a lively interest in it, it seems
+but fair that they too should have a voice in the matter. Another reason
+yet had considerable weight with me, that their letters evince a larger
+and more liberal sympathy with Mr. Ruskin himself than those of some of
+my clerical brethren, in whose letters there is but too perceptible a
+degree of irascibility, not unnatural to us, perhaps, in finding
+ourselves rather sharply lectured by a layman--the shepherds by the
+sheep. And I hoped that a more fraternal spirit would be promoted by my
+free acceptance of their ready offer.
+
+The same consenting spirit is all but universal in the notices of the
+press upon Mr. Ruskin's letters. But I do not wish to anticipate the
+judgment of "the Church and the world" upon the whole series of letters
+here presented. Notwithstanding the peculiar and sometimes rather
+bewildering effect of a variety of "cross lights," they appear to myself
+to be invested with singular interest as a faithful reflection of the
+opinions of the clergy and the laity upon some of the most stirring
+religious questions of the day.
+
+Moreover, it will, I am sure, please readers who have endeavoured in
+vain to extract some meaning out of many of the sometimes tedious and
+unintelligible essayists of the day, to observe that the discussion in
+this volume at least is carried on in language perfectly clear and
+within the reach of ordinary understandings. At any rate, I hope it will
+not be said of any of the writers who have together made up this little
+volume: "Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without
+knowledge?"
+
+Before the sheets are sent to press they will be perused by Mr. Ruskin,
+who will then use his privilege of replying, thus bringing the volume to
+a conclusion.
+
+I could not undertake to classify these letters; and have, therefore, as
+the simplest mode, arranged them in the alphabetical order of the
+writers' names.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CHARLES BIGG, D.D., _Rector of Fenny Compton_.
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin compares the clergyman with an Alpine guide, whose business
+it is simply to carry the traveller in safety over rocks and glaciers to
+the mountain top. He is not to trouble himself or his charge with
+needless refinements of doctrine. He is not to exaggerate the dignity of
+his office, or to give himself out as anything but a guide. In
+particular, he is not to assume anything of a mediatorial character. He
+is to preach the Gospel--not of Luther nor of Augustine, but of Christ;
+in plain words and short terms. He is to proclaim aloud, boldly and
+constantly, "This is the will of the Lord,"--to apply, that is, the
+morality of the Gospel, stringently and authoritatively, to the lives of
+his people. To effect this application with more power, he is to
+exercise a rigid discipline, and exclude from his congregation all who
+are not acting up to what he conceives to be the Gospel ideal. He is not
+to hamper himself with any set and formal Liturgy, which can never be
+copious or flexible enough to meet the varied needs of a number of men
+differing widely in knowledge and attainment.
+
+Every one will feel what a crowd of perplexities start up here at every
+sentence. In what sense is a clergyman like a Chamouni guide? There is a
+resemblance, no doubt, but not of a kind on which it would be possible
+to build any argument. It is not the business of the Alpine guide to
+exercise any supervision over the morals of his employers, or to ask how
+they earned the money with which he is paid. Again, what is meant by
+the Gospel of Christ not according to anybody? It is easy to reject the
+authority of St. Paul or St. John, or of Luther or Augustine, but there
+is one commentator whose influence cannot be shaken off, and that is
+ourselves. And our experience of those who have professed to preach the
+Gospel pure and simple is not reassuring. Does Mr. Ruskin mean that we
+are to burn all our theology,--even apparently the Epistles of St.
+Paul,--and to forget all Church history since the day of the
+Crucifixion? Does he mean that we are each to set up a theology--a
+Church of his own? It would be but a poor gain to most of us to exchange
+the great lamps of famous doctors for the uncertain rushlights of our
+own imaginations.
+
+Then again, what is this new and more than Genevan discipline that the
+clergyman is to enforce? He is to take more pains to get wicked rich men
+to stay out of the church than to persuade wicked poor ones to enter it.
+After putting his own interpretation upon the Gospel, he is to lay under
+an interdict all whom his own fire-new formula--for a formula he must
+still have--excludes. He is to force, by the method of Procrustes, the
+visible Church into co-extension with the invisible. No community of
+Christians has ever attempted such a task. Any zealous (surely
+over-zealous) parish priest who should so narrow the limits of his fold,
+who should exclude the "usurer" from the ordinary means of grace, for
+fear lest he should take God's name in vain by joining in the public
+prayers, would expose himself, may we not think? to the reproach of
+being less merciful than He who sends rain on the just and the unjust.
+Nor, as he looked round upon his carefully-selected congregation, could
+he easily flatter himself that he was preaching the Gospel "to every
+creature."
+
+Again, what is the will of the Lord, and what does Mr. Ruskin mean by
+proclaiming it? That He loves righteousness and hates iniquity we know.
+The difficulty is in applying this general rule in detail. What is its
+bearing upon the policy of the Government, upon any particular trade
+strike, upon the tangled web of good and evil motives which makes up the
+moral consciousness of an average shopkeeper? I conceive Mr. Ruskin to
+be thinking of preachers like Bernard, Savonarola, or Latimer, of
+denunciations like those of Isaiah, or of our Lord. He seems to mean
+that the clergyman should stand on a clear mountain summit, looking down
+over the whole field of life, discerning with the eye of a prophet every
+movement of evil on a small scale or on a large. There have been such
+teachers in whose hands science, economy, politics, seemed all to become
+branches of theology, members of one great body of Divine truth. But not
+every man's lips are thus touched with the coal from the altar. Many an
+excellent and most useful preacher would make but wild work if he took
+to denouncing social movements or the spirit of the age. A singular
+illustration of the danger that besets these sweeping moral judgments is
+to be found in Mr. Ruskin's own denunciation of usury, that is, of
+taking interest for money. Few people will agree either with the
+particular opinion that every old lady who lives harmlessly on her
+railway dividends ought to be excommunicated, or with the general
+principle implied in this opinion, that every prohibition in the Old
+Testament is still as valid as ever under social circumstances
+altogether different.
+
+People who need denouncing do not, as a rule, come to church to be
+denounced. And it would be a great error to conclude, from our Lord's
+language to the Pharisees and Sadducees, that the tone in which He
+addressed the individual sinner was harsh or scathing. The preacher must
+remember that he is a physician of souls, and the physician's touch is
+gentle. Think for a moment what worldliness is--how easy it is to say
+bitter things about it!--and then picture to yourselves a little
+tradesman with a wife and seven or eight children to keep on his scanty
+profits. What wonder if he sets too high a value on money? How difficult
+for him to understand the words which bid him take no thought for the
+morrow!
+
+There is a time, no doubt, for fierce language, but it does not often
+come. The preacher is no more exempt than other people from the golden
+rule to put himself in his neighbour's place, and try to see things with
+his neighbour's eyes.
+
+Another difficulty arises out of the manner in which Mr. Ruskin speaks
+of the relation of his Chamouni guides to dogmatic teaching. They ought
+not, he says, to be compelled to hold opinions on the subject, say, of
+the height of the Celestial Mountains, the crevasses which go down
+quickest to the pit, and other cognate points of science, differing
+from, or even contrary to, the tenets of the guides of the Church of
+France.
+
+It is difficult in the extreme to know exactly what is here meant. No
+doubt it is needless for a guide to drop a plumb-line down every
+crevasse that he has to cross. It would be great waste of time to
+lecture his travellers on the laws that regulate the motion of glaciers
+or the dip of the mountain strata. But what are the doctrines that stand
+in this relation, or this no-relation, to the spiritual life? Is it
+meant that all theology should be swept away like a dusty old cobweb?
+
+I would go myself as far as this, that the fewer and simpler the
+doctrines that a clergyman preaches, the better; that all doctrines
+should be required to pass the test of reason and conscience, which are
+also in their degrees Divine revelations, so far, at least, as this,
+that no doctrine can be admitted which is demonstrably repugnant to
+either one or the other. And in the third place, the greatest care
+should be taken to discriminate matters of faith, real axioms of
+religion, from pious opinions or venerable practices which have no vital
+connection with the Christian faith; which, to use Burke's phrase, all
+understandings do not ratify, and all hearts do not approve. A grave
+responsibility rests upon those who neglect this discrimination. It is
+also a point of the highest importance that when most doctrinal a
+clergyman should be least dogmatic; that he should remember that all
+doctrine, by the necessity of the case, is cast into an antithetical,
+more or less paradoxical shape; that he should never lose sight of the
+harmony and balance between intersecting truths, or of that unfortunate
+tendency of the human mind to seize upon and appropriate points of
+difference in their crudest and most antagonistic form, to the exclusion
+of points of agreement; that he should always do his best to show the
+reasonableness of the Christian teaching, its analogy and harmony with
+all the works of God; that where his knowledge fails, he should frankly
+confess that it does fail, and not try to eke it out by guesses, or to
+disguise its insufficiency by rhetoric.
+
+But after all these allowances it remains a fact that the clergyman is
+not a guide only, but a teacher, an ambassador. He is to teach his
+people all that he knows about God and His relation to the soul of man.
+He is to study and meditate himself, and to set forth the conclusion he
+has reached fully and fearlessly. And if he discharges this duty
+reasonably and zealously, he need not be afraid of finding that there is
+a gulf fixed between doctrine and practice. These two must go together.
+There can be no conduct deserving the name without a philosophy of
+conduct, and that philosophy is a sound divinity. Even the loftiest and
+most abstruse doctrines must have an influence upon life. It is a common
+remark that scientific truth should be pursued for its own sake, and
+that the most valuable practical results have often followed from
+investigations carried out with a single eye to the truth. It is an
+equally common remark that those teach the simplest things best whose
+range of knowledge and belief is widest. We might point to Mr. Ruskin
+himself as a striking illustration of this. What is simpler than beauty?
+what more universally apprehended? what at first sight more incapable of
+analysis? Yet as we listen to the great critic, what wonderful laws does
+he point out--what a wealth of knowledge does he bring to bear--how
+clear he makes it to us that the power of feeling (still more the power
+of creating) beauty is the hard-won fruit of labour, study, and
+devotion. So it is with life: those who would create a beautiful life
+must know the laws of spiritual beauty,--and those laws are theology.
+
+But criticism is a thankless task. It is a more gracious and, towards a
+great man, a more respectful office to note those points on which our
+debt to Mr. Ruskin is acknowledged, and our sympathy with him unalloyed.
+These letters are, in spirit at any rate, not unworthy of the man who
+has exercised a deeper and wider influence upon the morality of our time
+than any other, except perhaps Thomas Carlyle. And the great lesson of
+each of these eloquent teachers is the duty of Reality. There are many
+points in which we do not agree with them: let us be all the readier to
+acknowledge the debt that we owe. Both laymen,--like Amos, neither
+prophets nor sons of prophets,--they have done a work which, perhaps,
+under the altered circumstances of society, no professional preacher
+could have achieved. Any one who considers the earnestness and reverence
+of modern intellectual literature; the anxious desire even of the
+Agnostic to lay the foundations of his moral life as deep as possible;
+the manifold efforts, while denying all religion, yet to maintain the
+union of imagination and reason, without which there can be no loftiness
+of character, no nobility of aspiration, yet which nothing but religion
+can consecrate and fructify,--and compares all this with the sneering,
+self-satisfied flippancy of Gibbon and Voltaire, will feel how vast is
+the change for the better; and these two writers have been the chief
+instruments in bringing that change about.
+
+Let me notice briefly two points on which Mr. Ruskin insists in these
+letters with great force and beauty. The first is the love of the
+Father. No text is more familiar than that which tells us that "God is
+love." It is not indeed inconsistent with that other text which tells
+us that He is "a consuming fire." But if its meaning is fully imbibed
+and allowed to bear its natural fruit, it must result in the abandonment
+of those forensic views of our blessed Lord's atonement, which all the
+subtlety of Canon Mozley cannot bring into harmony with the dictates of
+our consciences. If the Father is love, there can be no division, no
+antithesis between the Father and the Son. If He is love, then the idea
+of sacrifice, which is of the essence of love, must enter into our
+conception of the Father also. I say no more about this, because any one
+who chooses to do so may find the Fatherhood of God, and all that it
+implies, treated of with great fulness and a marvellous depth of
+spiritual insight in the letters of Erskine of Linlathen.
+
+It can hardly be doubted that the kind of language which Protestants of
+a certain class have been, and still are, in the habit of using, about
+the "Scheme of Redemption," constitutes a most serious stumbling-block
+in the way of many an earnest spirit. There are few preachers probably,
+and few congregations now,--in the Establishment at any rate,--who
+would not revolt against the hideous calmness with which Jonathan
+Edwards contemplates the "little spiders" dropping off into the flames.
+But a great deal of mischief remains to be undone. Those who are
+acquainted with the biographies of Shelley, of James and of John Stuart
+Mill, know well what effect the fierce doctrines of Calvinism have
+produced upon minds which for the issues of morality and, surely, even
+of religion, were "finely touched." And who can tell what horror and
+indignation have been wrought in some minds, what agonies of despair in
+others, who, when at last the blessed work of repentance began to stir
+within them, and they turned their eyes for comfort to the cross, were
+met by the terrible warning that none but the select few can call God
+their Father, and that in all probability their own eternal tortures
+were decreed before ever they entered the world?
+
+The other point to which I must briefly advert is Mr. Ruskin's protest
+against the use of words which imply--which leave the least possibility
+of hoping for--a mechanical absolution, a pardon of sins that have not
+been abandoned. I do not indeed think that the reproach of using such
+language falls upon those who are fond of the title of priests alone,
+for the doctrines of Calvinism are far more liable to abuse. Nor do I
+think that any preaching of our clergy on this subject can be said to
+have "turned our cities into loathsome centres of fornication and
+covetousness." But here, if anywhere, we ought never to forget the
+danger of even seeming to set Theology against Reason and Conscience, of
+allowing the least pretext for thinking that a mere intellectual assent
+to abstract truths on the one hand, a mere acceptance of ecclesiastical
+ordinances on the other, can wipe away sins; or that a heart unpurified
+by charity and obedience, could be at rest even in the kingdom of
+heaven.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CANON COOPER, _Vicar of Grange-over-Sands_.
+
+
+Thank God, all good men are broader and better than their creed,--better
+and broader, I mean, than those parts of their creed which they insist
+upon most, because they distinguish them from other people. (These
+distinguishing points are always of the least importance, in my
+opinion.) And with my experience of sermons for nearly forty years (for
+I was very early "called upon to hear sermons"), I am not conscious of
+such universal omissions on the part of the "priests" of the Church of
+England as Mr. Ruskin affirms. The universality of the _love_ of God the
+_Father_, embracing even the "_wicked rich_" as well as the "wicked
+poor," is largely dwelt upon by all "schools."
+
+The kingdom of God _in this present sinful world_ is preached and is
+laboured for. In the present, however, it is more correctly described as
+the _kingdom of Christ_. When "the end comes," "He shall deliver up the
+kingdom to God, _even the Father_" (1 Cor. xv. 24, and _seqq._) As for
+denouncing the sins of the rich, this is largely done, and especially by
+"lively young ecclesiastics" in great towns. And as to preaching
+forgiveness without amendment, no man of common sense can do that; but
+Mr. Ruskin may say that common sense is rare among the clergy; and some
+may be afraid to preach morality, because of an old-fashioned
+superstition that _morality_ is opposed to the _Gospel_. However, I do
+not hear much of such preaching. As for the duty of every man to do
+something of the work of the world for his daily bread, that is largely
+taught; and I believe that the kingdom of God is coming in that respect.
+A great deal of the drudgery of the world is done by big men now. Also I
+think that the sinfulness of _omission_ is much insisted on by the
+clergy, as it is abundantly noticed in the Prayer Book, in accordance
+with the clear teaching of Christ. And the same may be said upon the
+_personal guilt_ of sin. A good clergyman never allows his people to
+shelter themselves _in a crowd_.
+
+I do not feel the force of the taunt about our saying every week, "There
+is no health in us," because the most "healthy" Christian finds out
+always fresh failings as his conscience grows more healthy (not morbidly
+sensitive), and he is always ready to join in the general confession to
+his dying day.
+
+There is some value in the remark about Christian parents putting their
+children into situations where they will be tempted to worship the
+devil in order to win the kingdom of the world; but here, as elsewhere,
+the exaggeration, for the sake of being forcible, is too marked.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ HENRY M. FLETCHER.
+
+
+"Yes," I should say, "it is possible to put the Gospel of Christ into
+such plain words and short terms as that a plain man may understand it,
+and plain men do understand it. And it is not left to be gathered out of
+(any of) the Thirty-nine Articles, which are meant not for simple but
+for clerkly people."
+
+You seem to have felt it startling that Mr. Ruskin should ask for a
+simple and comprehensible statement of the Christian Gospel--at least
+Mr. Ruskin represents the case so. What Christ's ministers are bidden to
+go into all the world and preach is--the good news that God has
+reconciled the world unto Himself in Jesus Christ His Son; and that
+whosoever will accept this Jesus as His Lord and Saviour shall have
+eternal life through Him. You could not, I think, arrive at a
+definition of what the Gospel of Christ is by explaining the terms of
+the Lord's Prayer.
+
+You must tell first about _Jesus_, our Lord, and what He has done,
+before child or man can have any proper notion of "the Gospel." The
+Gospel is a message from "Our Father which is in Heaven," of His love,
+and of what His love--the love of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost--has
+devised and executed for the redemption and glorification (through
+sanctification) of His rebellious children.
+
+There can be small objection taken to Mr. Ruskin's proposal to make the
+Lord's Prayer "a foundation of Gospel teaching, as containing what all
+Christians are agreed upon as first to be taught," if the "Gospel
+teaching" is understood to be "teaching the truth to _Christians_." But
+"the Gospel teaching or preaching," which is spoken of by Mr. Ruskin, is
+"Gospel preaching" to the world not yet Christian, either Jewish or
+heathen; and the Lord's Prayer cannot properly be taken as a foundation
+of Gospel teaching to it. It must be told first of Jesus and His work,
+and must have owned Him "Lord," before it can rightly be taught from
+_His_ prayer. This prayer can have no _authority_ but to those who have
+become His disciples. Those who are already His disciples learn
+naturally from Him their relation and their duty to His Father and their
+Father. St. Paul, in preaching to the Athenians, dwells not on the
+Fatherhood _of God_, but on the need of repentance as a preparation for
+the judgment which awaits all. "Jesus and the Resurrection" was what
+they heard of first from this model preacher.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ A. T. DAVIDSON.
+
+
+MY DEAR SIR,--Permit me to say one thing with regard to the
+correspondence which has passed between Mr. Ruskin and yourself.
+
+Profitable as it is to listen to Mr. Ruskin, the student of Mr.
+Maurice's writings will merely find in these remarkable letters an
+additional plea on behalf of those truths for which Mr. Maurice so
+bravely and so passionately contended. It is most refreshing to find two
+such teachers in accord; and probably there will be many who will learn
+from Mr. Ruskin what they never would have learnt, or even sought for,
+from Mr. Maurice. It is, of course, for the truth, and not for his
+individual statement of it, that Mr. Ruskin, even as Mr. Maurice did,
+contends. It will, I am sure, be a matter of small moment to him so long
+as the truth be sought for, whether it be arrived at by means of these
+letters, or by means of Mr. Maurice's books on "The Lord's Prayer," "The
+Prayer Book," and "The Commandments."
+
+Believe me, my dear Sir, to be yours faithfully.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ EDWARD GEOGHEGAN.
+
+
+ BARDSEA VICARAGE, ULVERSTON.
+
+"Open rebuke is better than secret love. Faithful are the wounds of a
+friend. Let the righteous smite me, it shall be a kindness: and let him
+reprove me, it shall be an excellent oil, which shall not break my
+head."
+
+It is in the spirit which is expressed in these words that I desire to
+offer the following notes on Mr. Ruskin's Letters. Among the charges
+which he brings against the clergy are the following:--
+
+That we have no clear idea of our calling, or of the Gospel of Christ
+(Letters III. and IV.)
+
+That we profane the name of God in the pulpit (Letter VI.)
+
+That we teach that every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the
+Lord, and He delighteth in them (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we hold our office to be that, not of showing men how to do their
+Father's will on earth, but how to get to heaven without doing any of it
+either here or there (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we neither profess to understand what the will of the Lord is, nor
+to teach anybody else to do it (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we pretend to absolve the sinner from his punishment, instead of
+purging him from his sin (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we patronize and encourage all the iniquity of the world by
+steadily preaching away the penalties of it (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we gather, each into himself, the curious dual power and
+Janus-faced majesty in mischief of the prophet that prophesies falsely,
+and the priest that bears rule by his means (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we do not exercise discipline by keeping wicked people out of
+church (Letter VI.)
+
+That we do not require each member of our flocks to tell us what they do
+to earn their dinners (Letter IX.)
+
+That we encourage people in hypocrisy, by inviting them to the
+authorized mockery of a confession of sin (Letter X.)
+
+I cannot examine the evidence which Mr. Ruskin possesses in support of
+these charges, as he has not produced it in these Letters. Neither can I
+attempt to refute the accusations. To prove a negative is always
+difficult; it becomes an impossible task when the indictment is laid not
+against any individuals mentioned by name, but against a whole order. I
+will only observe, that even if all these charges be true, the people of
+England are not in such evil case as Mr. Ruskin fancies. The laity of
+England possess the inestimable advantage of not being dependent on the
+sermons of their clergy for either doctrine, or correction, or
+instruction in righteousness. Even though a clergyman should never
+utter certain doctrines of Christ from the pulpit, or reprove certain
+sins, he is obliged to do so at the font, at the lectern, and at the
+altar. Although from the pulpits of the fifty hundreds of clergy whom
+Mr. Ruskin heard, he never heard so much as _one_ clergyman heartily
+proclaiming that no covetous person, which is an idolater, hath any
+inheritance in the kingdom of God, he must have often heard this
+proclamation from the altar, in the epistle for the third Sunday in
+Lent, and from the lectern whenever the fifth chapter of the Epistle to
+the Ephesians is read for the lesson.
+
+Again, if any clergyman teaches from the pulpit that for the redemption
+of the world people ought to be thankful, not to the Father, but to the
+Son (Letter V.), he is obliged to publicly contradict his own teaching
+as often as he says the General Thanksgiving, and the collects in the
+Book of Common Prayer.
+
+Again, if any clergyman teaches from the pulpit that any one who does
+evil is good in the sight of the Lord, or that there is any other
+salvation except a salvation from sin, he is obliged to publicly
+contradict that teaching by everything which he says in the church out
+of the pulpit.
+
+Again, if any clergyman preaches away the penalties of sin (Letter
+VIII.), he is obliged to publicly contradict his preaching every Ash
+Wednesday, when he reads the general sentences of God's cursing against
+impenitent sinners.
+
+Mr. Ruskin asks (Letter III.), "Can this Gospel of Christ be put into
+such plain words and short terms as that a plain man may understand it?"
+I answer that the English Church has tried to do this in the Catechism,
+in which every baptized child is taught in very simple and plain words
+the gospel, or good news, that God the Father has, in His Son Jesus
+Christ, adopted him or her into His family, and therein offers him or
+her the continual help of the Holy Ghost.
+
+Mr. Ruskin complains that the clergy do not teach the people the meaning
+of the Lord's Prayer (Letter VI.) He must assume that the clergy neglect
+to teach children the Church Catechism, in which is an answer to the
+question, "What desirest thou of God in this prayer?" It is an answer
+which would probably satisfy Mr. Ruskin. He would see that "Hallowed be
+Thy name" does not merely mean that people ought to abstain from bad
+language. And in the explanation of the third commandment, he would see
+that something more is forbidden than letting out a round oath (Letter
+VI.)
+
+Mr. Ruskin complains that the clergy do not prevent the entrance among
+their congregations of persons leading openly wicked lives (Letter VI.)
+Before this can be charged on the clergy as a sin, he should show that
+they have power and authority to do this. In the service for Ash
+Wednesday he will find that the clergy express their desire for a
+restoration of the godly discipline of the primitive Church, which Mr.
+Ruskin also desires. But he ought to know that such restoration must be
+the work not of the clergy only, but of the whole body of the faithful.
+
+Mr. Ruskin insinuates that the clergy have no clear idea of their
+calling (Letter III.) If this be so, it is certainly not the fault of
+the Church, seeing that the nature of the calling of a clergyman is
+plainly set forth in the Offices for the Ordering of Bishops, Priests,
+and Deacons. But if one may form an opinion from many published sermons
+by English clergymen of various schools of thought, and from their
+speeches in Church Congresses and elsewhere, and from their pastoral
+work as parish priests, I should be inclined to think that they are not
+quite so ignorant of the nature of their calling and of the Gospel of
+Christ as Mr. Ruskin supposes them to be, and that of some of the sins,
+negligences, and ignorances which, in these Letters, he lays to their
+charge, they may plead not guilty, or at least not proven by Mr. Ruskin.
+
+
+
+
+ BARDSEA, ULVERSTON,
+ _November 3rd, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I thank you for your letter, which I received this
+morning. Second thoughts are not always the best. Your own first thought
+about the motto which I prefixed to my notes was right; your second
+thought was wrong. It never occurred to me that anyone could possibly
+suppose that that motto was by me intended to be applied to myself,
+inasmuch as in these notes there is no "wound" inflicted on Mr. Ruskin,
+or even any "rebuke." On the contrary, I assume that he has evidence in
+support of his charges, although he has not produced it. The "rebuke" to
+which I alluded was _Mr. Ruskin's_ rebuke. _He_ is the "friend" whose
+wounds are faithful, and whose smitings are a kindness. For I have not
+the least doubt of his good-will towards the clergy, or of his earnest
+desire to see them all performing their sacred duties with zeal and
+knowledge. And it was as my acknowledgment of this that I prefixed the
+motto. With you I firmly believe that the standard which he takes is
+"lofty and Christian," and that it is one towards which we ought all of
+us to aim. The object of my notes was to show that the laity of England
+have, in the authorized teaching of the Church, a sufficient safeguard
+against any erroneous teaching which they may possibly hear from the
+pulpit or in the private ministrations of the clergy, and also a
+supplement to any defective teaching.
+
+ Very truly yours,
+ EDWARD GEOGHEGAN.
+
+
+
+
+ _From_ JOSEPH GILBURT, Esq.
+
+
+ _Christmas Day_, 1879.
+
+The words "Thy will be done" are generally coupled with resignation, and
+very often with patience under chastisement. It is always to us a
+sad-coloured sentence, and a sentimental illuminator of the Lord's
+Prayer would in all probability make it so. Now, if we think for a
+moment what the state of things would be if the will of the Lord were
+done, we shall see it should be the brightest sentence we could
+conceive. God's will is our weal. Aspiration, not resignation, is the
+characteristic of its doing. There would certainly be no death,--that is
+decidedly contrary to His will; and by-and-by, when His will is done,
+there will be none. For the present, while His will is not yet done, we
+have the sure and certain hope that death will be--nay, is--conquered by
+anticipation.
+
+If His will were done, all beautiful things would flourish, and all
+minds would answeringly rejoice in them.
+
+Our men of the piercing eye--Turners, Hunts, Ruskins, etc.--show us,
+till we almost worship the state of things in cloud and mountain, river
+and sea, in hedgerow and wayside, even in cathedral and campanile, where
+God's will is done, and we are enchanted with their beauty. It is God's
+will that stones should be laid truly and carven well, and aptly
+described. And our men of the probe and the lens, the scientific openers
+of nature's secrets, are daily demonstrating new beauties in which the
+will of the Lord is done in the formation of bodies and working of
+forces. It is mere truism to add to this that the will of the Lord being
+done, none of the ills that are all of them indirectly or directly the
+result of not doing it could occur, and resignation would have no scope
+for exercise. There was One who always did it, and He for three years
+made sundry parts of Palestine a heaven,--with what results a many
+quondam poor folk testified. This leads me to say that I like to look
+upon the word heaven as a participle instead of a noun, as the state of
+being heaved or raised, rather than a place: and for this reason. The
+experience of every one of us suffices to prove that we are never so
+_heaven_, or raised in true happiness, moral dignity, and worth, as
+when we are in the company of one greater, wiser, or better than
+ourselves. Those who lead a humdrum life among mean persons, can testify
+what a heaven it is to be transplanted for ever so short a time to the
+company of a great and good man. Now the culminating, indeed
+all-absorbing, attraction of the heaven we all look to, is the presence
+and the companionship of the greatest and best; and the experience of
+ourselves tallies with the promise of St. John that it will have the
+effect of making us "like Him," when "we shall see Him as He is." Surely
+being _heaven_, or raised like that, is superior to any Mahomet's
+paradise that we can invent or distil out of the poetical parts of the
+Scriptures.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ ARCHER GURNEY.
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin's view as to the duty of basing all upon the Father's love is
+essentially sound and orthodox; and he is also right in bidding all men
+lead self-denying lives,--in this sense, that they should give up time
+and labour to the endeavour to help their brethren; but he fails
+utterly, hopelessly, to realize the Incarnation and its glorious
+consequences, how all human life and love,--how art, science, knowledge,
+enjoyment, are sanctified by God's becoming man; sharing this human life
+of ours,--not to trample upon it as an unholy thing, but to consecrate
+it to God's service. Such is our call. We must enjoy the beautiful to
+vindicate enjoyment. We do not please God by casting all His choicest
+gifts away. To give all we have to feed the poor is the way to make men
+poor, and is false charity. Use rather the mammon of this world to God's
+honour and glory, and when ye fail, the good works that you have done
+shall plead for your entrance into everlasting habitations; for the way
+to clothe the naked and feed the hungry, permanently, is to teach men
+and women to help themselves, and to find employment and reward for the
+exercise of their powers and energies.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ J. H. A. GIBSON, _Brighton_.
+
+
+To Mr. Ruskin, then, asking us to define ourselves as a body, I reply,
+We are presbyters and deacons, deriving our authority from the
+episcopate, who themselves form links in that spiritual chain which
+binds both ourselves and them, by perpetual succession, in one communion
+and fellowship, with the Apostles, and to whom has been committed the
+office of consecrating and sending forth labourers to work in the Lord's
+vineyard.
+
+But Mr. Ruskin proceeds, "And our business as such." Our business as
+such! Well, if we have in any satisfactory manner proved our first
+point--_that_ is, the authority with which we act--we may fairly say to
+Mr. Ruskin, "Do you put this question, 'What is your business?' to your
+lawyer or doctor?" Does he ask the same question of the clergy of any
+other portion of the Catholic Church? We shall not wish to insult Mr.
+Ruskin by attempting to explain to him the duties of the priesthood,
+with which, doubtless, he is well acquainted.
+
+But he asks, "Do we look upon ourselves as attached to any particular
+State, and bound to the promulgation of any particular tenets?" We are
+undoubtedly attached to the particular sphere to the which we are sent
+by those whose office is to provide the various parts of God's vineyard
+with labourers. The Anglican Church is the legitimate representative of
+the Catholic Church of Christ in England; and we, as clergy of this
+Church, minister for the most part to our countrymen at home, and only
+in other countries as the necessities of our colonists and others may
+require. And, as subscribers to the Prayer Book and priests of the
+Church of England, we are certainly bound to teach faithfully and
+honestly her doctrines, neither adding to them nor taking away from them
+according to our own individual idiosyncrasies.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CANON GRAY.
+
+
+ WOLSINGHAM, _October 13th, 1879_.
+
+MY DEAR PENRHYN,--Will you please to thank Mr. Malleson on my behalf for
+the Letters on the Lord's Prayer? I have ever admired Ruskin, and learn
+much even when I most differ from him. But if I had the good fortune to
+be with you to-morrow, I fear that I should constantly be demurring to
+his teaching,--_e.g._ (Letter III.) his supposition that the Thirty-nine
+Articles were meant to include a summary of the Gospel; (Letter V.) his
+belief that there is need now to warn men against being thankful not to
+the Father but only to the Son,--a remnant of the teaching of his youth;
+(p. 20) his hard way of speaking as to the Son of Man, Whose human soul,
+as that of perfect man, received its knowledge in steps according to His
+own will as perfect God; (Letter VII.) his confused distinction between
+the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Christ (see Eph. v. 5 in the
+Greek, and remember "_tradendo tenet_" on 1 Cor. xv. 24); his belief
+that because no one knoweth the hour of Christ's coming, it cannot be
+hastened by prayer; (Letter VIII.) his seeming identification of
+claiming interest from a poor man who is in need and necessity, and from
+a railway company who borrow money to make more,--speaking, as far as I
+can see, of money as if it had no market value like other things;
+(Letter X.) the belief that we clergy are not awake to the guilt of sins
+of omission; (Letter X.) the inability to see that the nearer and nearer
+by God's grace we come, in answer to prayer, to purity and holiness, the
+more we _realize_ our distance from them; and that his objection to our
+Liturgy might be adapted into one against the Lord's Prayer, in which we
+pray daily for forgiveness of sins, and deliverance from evil, showing
+that we never shall be so delivered as no longer to need forgiveness;
+(Letter XI.) the supposition that any one state of life is necessarily
+more full of temptations than another, as though the fruit of a tree
+were not to Eve what the glory of the world was to the Son of Man, at
+least in the eye of the Tempter.
+
+I am ashamed to jot down thus obscurely the points on which I should
+have liked to speak, and I know that our brethren can fully deal with
+them. On the other hand (Letter VIII.) there is much to move us, and
+lead to searchings of heart. As to the timidity and coldness with which
+the Church is attacking the crying sins of our day, one often feels how
+we need some among us to speak as the prophets did to the men of their
+generation, and we may be thankful to have our shortcomings brought home
+to us by words like Ruskin's.
+
+I wish I were not writing so hurriedly.
+
+Remember me most affectionately to all my old and true friends who are
+with you to-morrow.
+
+
+[NOTE.--_March 12th, 1880_:--
+
+Mr. Malleson has kindly brought this letter of mine again before me.
+Hasty and concise as it was, I have no wish to expand it, as Mr.
+Ruskin's Letters are now _publici juris_, and in the hands of many a
+critic, who will rejoice to deal with them according to his wisdom. I
+should be thankful, however, for leave to add a few words on one point.
+I cannot help having misgivings as to whether I was right in demurring
+without hesitation to "the supposition that one state of life is
+necessarily more free from temptations than another," for I well know
+that in favour of such a supposition there is a strong _consensus_ of
+just men. I am, however, one of those who believe that the shorter
+Beatitude, "Blessed be ye poor," (Luke vi. 20) is explained by the
+longer, "Blessed are the poor in spirit." I see, also, that the
+difficulty with which "they that have riches" enter the kingdom of God
+is reasserted with a qualification in the very next verse, which speaks
+of those "who trust in riches" (St. Mark x. 23, 24). "Who then can be
+saved?" asked the disciples, who, poor men indeed themselves, first
+heard of this difficulty, instinctively perceiving, it may be, that it
+has its root in temptations from which in one shape or other no one is
+free. I read that "the cares of this world," as well as "the
+deceitfulness of riches," choke the Word; and I am sure that into the
+number of those "who will be rich," or "who are wishing to be rich," and
+so "fall into temptation," a poor man may but too easily find his way. I
+like to remember that when "the beggar died," he was carried into the
+bosom of one who had been "very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold;"
+and I think that very deep and far-stretching may be the meaning of the
+words of the wise man, "The rich and poor meet together, and the Lord is
+the Maker of them all."]
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ H. N. GRIMLEY, _Norton Rectory, Bury St. Edmunds_.
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin's Letters have already been closely scrutinized. What have
+seemed to be blemishes in them have been commented on. They have been
+spoken of as somewhat random utterances--as utterances such as are
+pardonable in a layman, but would be inexcusable in a clergyman who
+should endeavour to instruct his brethren. It has been said of them that
+they manifest a want of knowledge of teaching constantly being given
+from Church of England pulpits. It would be quite possible for the
+present paper to be devoted to a continuation of the like free criticism
+of the Letters. I might ask, for instance, whether Mr. Ruskin, after (in
+Letter V.) speaking with condemnation of a plan of salvation which sets
+forth the Divine Son as appeasing the wrath of the Father in heaven,
+does not himself give expression to words, as to the love of the Father,
+which almost imply that in his estimation the Divine mind is not in
+unity in itself? I might further ask for Mr. Ruskin to put more
+definiteness into his remarks on usury, and to particularize the
+special forms of that condemnable practice which the clergy should
+boldly denounce. The few hints which he throws out on this subject show
+that to his own thoughts there is present an exalted socialism. He
+himself in previous writings, while shadowing forth a social system
+based on unselfishness, has carefully deprecated any revolutionary
+attempt to hasten the establishment of such a system, and would prefer
+that it should be waited for while it quietly and with orderliness
+evolves itself out of the present imperfect order of things. Is it not
+so evolving itself? Does not the co-operative movement, now steadily
+advancing, spring out of the recognition of the fact that mutual welfare
+is a far more excellent thing to be attained than the enrichment of the
+few at the expense of the many? And if, with regard to the land
+question, any readjustment of relations is made, will it not be made in
+the light of the same beneficent principle? If, however, the clergy were
+to give heed to Mr. Ruskin's words, and at once proceed to the
+indiscriminate excommunication of usurers, would they not be initiating
+a social revolution, altogether different from that orderly upgrowth of
+a better state of things which has commended itself aforetime to Mr.
+Ruskin himself? My own impression is that I shall be giving voice to a
+wish that will spring up wherever Mr. Ruskin's Letters may be read, if I
+say that a clearer, more definite utterance on the usury question would
+be welcomed. The clergy everywhere would receive with thankfulness any
+hints as to how they might hasten the coming of the day when the Church
+of Christ will no longer embrace within her borders the few, with a
+useless excess of wealth, and around them the unhappy many, hopelessly,
+squalidly destitute; along, too, with a vast number of toiling teachers,
+clergy, artists, and literary workers, living mostly on the verge of
+pennilessness--men of whose existence Mr. Ruskin has, in earlier
+writings, expressed himself as keenly and sympathetically conscious.
+
+But I will not linger on such parts of Mr. Ruskin's Letters as may seem
+to display inconsistency, or to need more precision of language before
+they can be practically useful. I will proceed to speak of those for
+which, as it seems to me, the clergy may unhesitatingly be very
+grateful to Mr. Ruskin for laying them before them.
+
+And first, I think we cannot be other than thankful to Mr. Ruskin for
+sounding at the outset a note of catholicity. He asks the clergy of the
+English Church (let me say he asks us,--he asks you and me), whether we
+look upon ourselves as the clergy of a mere insular Church, or as the
+clergy of the Church Universal. Is the teaching we are continually
+giving utterance to as to the conduct of life in harmony with, or
+different from, the teaching of the Christian Churches on the Continent
+of Europe? Mr. Ruskin's tone, in asking these questions, is such as
+implies that it would be no satisfaction to him to hear from us that we
+rejoice in considering ourselves as severed from the clergy of the
+Christian Church abroad. Indeed, he goes on to assume that we, with one
+consenting voice, admit our fellowship with the rest of
+Christendom--that we recognize as our brothers the clergy of the Church
+of France, and of the Church of Italy, and of the Church everywhere.
+
+Mr. Ruskin thus does not lend the support of his name to any useless
+Protestantism. There are senses in which the whole Christian Church must
+ever be a Protestant Church, and in which even individual members may
+from time to time raise protesting voices. The Church must ever lift up
+her protest against all influences that work in the world for
+evil--against whatsoever tends to overthrow the Christian ideals of
+individual, family, social, national, and international life. She must
+protest against all hindrances, even though they may spring up within
+her own borders, which tend to prevent her from putting any beneficent
+impress upon human handiwork and upon manifestations of human genius.
+She must protest against the very Protestantism in her midst which has
+served to paganize art and to demoralize the drama, by banishing both to
+an outer region of darkness which Gospel rays cannot be expected to
+illumine. She must protest vigorously against the mischievous
+Protestantism which impoverishes the intellect and chills the
+affections, by causing men to devote the whole energies of their lives
+to protesting against systems of thought with which they are very
+imperfectly acquainted, and to maintaining an attitude of perpetual
+suspicion as to others' aims and motives. Under the influence of such
+Protestantism as this, many have been possessed with the assurance that
+a vast number of the clergy of Christendom live for no other end than to
+conspire against freedom, to disseminate falsities, and to work ruin
+amongst human souls. This Protestantism is fast ceasing to have any
+power amongst us; still, as it is not quite extinct, it is comforting to
+find that Mr. Ruskin does not attribute it to the main body of those
+whom he addresses.
+
+To me it seems that an habitual protesting attitude on the part of those
+who are called upon to be the teachers of the Church implies that they
+have not themselves properly entered the temple of Christian truth. He
+to whom Christian doctrine has revealed itself in all its wondrous
+harmony cannot do other than devote himself to unfolding to others what
+is ever present to his own mind, so that he may aid in building up their
+thoughts consistently and symmetrically, and thus help to establish them
+firmly in the Christian faith.
+
+We may, then, it seems to me, express our thankfulness that Mr. Ruskin
+has spoken, though ever so briefly, a word of encouragement to the
+clergy of the English Church amongst whom the thought of a future of
+reunion for Christendom has been welcomed. Mr. Ruskin is familiar with
+the practical working of the Christian Church in Italy and elsewhere on
+the Continent, and seeing, as he has seen, that her influence is exerted
+towards securing an orderly and healthy state of social life, he does
+not give circulation to the indiscriminate calumnies which were once
+wont to be uttered, and which were alike at variance with the truth and
+provocative of a mischievous severance of Christians from one another.
+
+But we must, I think, be more especially grateful to Mr. Ruskin for his
+calling widespread attention to the great Christian doctrine of the
+Fatherhood of God. There is especial need for this being uplifted before
+the thoughts of men at the present day, and it is being so uplifted. The
+more it is upheld, the more fully will it be discerned. It cannot be
+said that the doctrine is not accepted within the English Church. Still,
+it has not yet been received in all its fulness. Amongst the
+separatists outside the borders of our Church, the doctrine that God is
+the Father of all humanity, and the loving Father too, is rejected in
+two extreme ways. The set of "believers" who adopt the one extreme view
+consider that the Lord's Prayer--so luminous, as Mr. Ruskin reminds us,
+with the thought of God's fatherly love--should be used only by the
+elect, such as themselves, and that all others have no right to address
+God as their Father. The other set of so-called "believers" considers
+with a deplorable Pharisaism that they have arrived at such a stage of
+perfection as to be beyond the need for using words which require them
+to ask every day for forgiveness of their trespasses. Why should they
+ask for such, they say, when their trespasses are non-existent? If they
+are children of the Father they are not so in the same sense as those
+who conscientiously use the prayer addressed to the Father in heaven. I
+regret that Mr. Ruskin's facile pen has betrayed him into writing some
+words with reference to our Liturgy which bring him momentarily into
+sympathy with these self-righteous ones who have no need to confess
+that they want more health of soul.
+
+But the doctrine of the loving Fatherhood of God, as revealed to us in
+Christ, is one that is unfolding itself more and more clearly to the
+Christian world. If it has unfolded itself to us we may aid in its
+increased discernment. It is one that involves the acceptance of the
+thought that all human life and every sphere of human endeavour are
+under Divine patronage. God is in every way our Father. All human
+excellences whatsoever exist in their fulness and perfection in Him. As
+they are manifested in us and in our brothers and sisters around us,
+they are Divine excellences becoming incarnate on the realm of humanity.
+
+Childhood, for instance, as it manifests its sweetness and winsomeness
+in Christian homes, is an outcome of the eternal childhood which dwells
+in God, and which was manifested supremely to the world in the life of
+the Divine Child at Bethlehem and Nazareth.
+
+So that the doctrine of the loving Fatherhood of God has sheltering
+beneath it the thought of the divineness of childhood. Clustering with
+it are many kindred thoughts. There is the divineness of youth, the
+frankness of Christian boyhood, the tender grace of Christian
+girlhood,--these are manifestations of the eternal youth abiding in the
+Divine Lord of humanity.
+
+I might speak to you in like manner of the divineness of manhood and of
+womanhood, and of the divineness of old age. All womanly excellences, as
+well as all manly virtues, reside in the Divine One. I might speak to
+you of the divineness of wedded life, the divineness of Christian
+fatherliness and motherliness. The divineness of the student's life and
+of the teacher's life might also be dwelt upon. The divineness of the
+ministry of reconciliation, in which ministry all may take part who help
+others to separate themselves from sin and selfishness and to enter into
+union with God and His life of love,--this I present to you as a
+fruitful thought. The divineness of all efforts tending towards the
+solace and comforting of suffering human souls,--that too is one of the
+beneficent thoughts involved in the great Christian truth that God is
+the Father of humanity.
+
+But the same great truth leads us to the discernment of other useful
+thoughts. I might speak of them as connected with the divineness of all
+toil which has for its object the increase of human knowledge, the
+gathering together of the stored-up lessons of the past, the beautifying
+of the daily life, the refining and spiritualizing of the daily thoughts
+of the great brotherhood and sisterhood. It would thus be quite
+justifiable to speak of the divineness of scientific toil, inasmuch as
+that has for its aim the unfolding of the thoughts of God, of which all
+appearances of the material world are the outcome and manifestation.
+Thus too I might speak of the divineness of the work of those who enable
+us to see the results of the Divine guidance bestowed on the world in
+the ages past. I might speak of the divineness of the work of the artist
+who devotes himself to acquiring skill in subtly entangling in the
+colours he puts on canvas the sentiment underlying the landscape he
+reverently looks at, which to him is a manifestation of a heaven of
+beauty unseen by heedless eyes. I might also speak of the divineness of
+the labours of the Christian poet, who presents to the world truth in
+its feminine and most winning aspects.
+
+When I should have spoken of all these things they could all be summed
+up into one phrase--the divineness of Humanity. And this is what I have
+faintly attempted to show necessarily springs up for recognition as the
+doctrine of the Fatherhood of God presents itself to us in all its
+impressiveness.
+
+I must hasten to a close. I have said that Mr. Ruskin in what he asks us
+with reference to our relation to the Church in other countries sounds a
+note of catholicity. In what I have myself said as to Protestantism I
+have urged nothing inconsistent with a thorough loyalty to the principle
+of Christian individualism. But individualism in utter revolt against
+authority leads only to confusion and to a multiplicity of tyrannies.
+Individualism thrives best under the protection of a generous
+all-embracing authority. Individualism before taking up the attitude of
+revolt should consider that it, by brave patience and a reverent
+submissiveness to all higher influences around it, may contribute
+beneficently to the authority of the future, and increase the
+generousness and catholicity of its sway.
+
+I will further remark that Mr. Ruskin's words as to the Fatherhood of
+God are also a catholic utterance. For the Fatherhood of God when
+pondered upon helps us to see that no sphere of human effort is beyond
+His control; that His house is one of many mansions of thought and
+affection and loving toil; that His heavenly kingdom is one including
+all domains on which human energies can be directed, over which human
+thoughts can roam, on which human love can lavish itself.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CANON E. H. M'NEILE, _Liverpool_.
+
+
+What is the exact question asked in Letter II.?
+
+Is it whether the clergy are or are not teachers of universal science?
+
+If so, we answer, Yes, we are teachers of the science most universal of
+all, namely, the knowledge of God, which is eternal life: and of the way
+to attain it, which is holiness; and the principles of this science,
+which are universal, are not, as in other sciences, discovered by human
+research, but are revealed by God.
+
+Does the question imply that there are points of science on which it is
+of no consequence what opinions a teacher holds? And if so, does it
+further mean that all matters of doctrine, such as are defined in the
+Thirty-nine Articles, are of this nature?
+
+If so, I answer that it is only the theories or speculations of
+scientific investigators about which variety of opinion is immaterial,
+not the essential principles of the science; and that we cannot exclude
+all questions of doctrine from among those principles. I do not know
+what is meant by holding different opinions on points of science. About
+the facts of science there can be no difference of opinion; but there
+may be about the bearings, and the inferences to be drawn from them.
+
+
+LETTER III
+
+Here is a definite question. My answer is, Yes, but we do not refer to
+the Thirty-nine Articles for a statement of the Gospel, but rather to
+the Apostles' Creed, which contains the simplest summary of the facts on
+which the Gospel rests. (See 1 Cor. xv. 1, etc.)
+
+
+LETTER IV
+
+Here I answer, No. The Lord's Prayer was not intended to be a statement
+of the Gospel, but the language of those who have accepted it. No doubt
+the terms of the prayer may be so explained as to bring in a definition
+of the Gospel, working backwards; but a complete explanation would be
+longer than the Thirty-nine Articles. There seems to be a serious
+confusion of thought here between the offer of salvation to sinners
+estranged from God, and the utterance towards God of His reconciled
+children.
+
+
+LETTER V
+
+The Lord's Prayer is elementary teaching for Christians, but it is not
+the first thing to be taught to those outside the family of God. The
+truth that we have a Father in heaven is a fundamental part of the
+Gospel. It is assumed in the Lord's Prayer; and so is the further truth
+that our Father of His tender love towards us has given His Son to die
+for us, that we may be delivered from the "consuming fire" which sin,
+not God, has kindled; and thus we have indeed a blessed scheme of pardon
+for which we are to be thankful to _both_ the Father and the Son. This
+makes _all_ the clauses of the apostolic blessing intelligible and
+living.
+
+
+LETTER VI
+
+Page 14: "For _other_ sins," etc. I think this is an incorrect comment.
+The force of the threat is positive, not comparative. The language of
+the law is similar towards every sin.
+
+In what is said about the abomination of hypocrisy in prayer we
+cordially agree. God give us grace to avoid it ourselves, and to warn
+our brethren faithfully against it! But in what follows there is an
+assumption of a power of discipline which the clergy do not possess,
+and which I fear the laity would be most unwilling to concede to them.
+Mr. Ruskin seems also to slip into the old error of the servants in the
+parable of the tares.
+
+
+LETTER VII
+
+On page 21 St. John xiv. 9 is incorrectly cited, and it is difficult to
+know the exact drift of the writer.
+
+I object to the statement that "in all His relations to us and commands
+to us," etc. (See, _e.g._, St. Matt. xxviii. 18-20.)
+
+As to His not knowing whether His prayer could be heard, see St. John
+xi. 41, 42.
+
+I think it is incorrect to say that our Lord Himself _used_ the prayer
+He gave us, at least in its entirety as it stands.
+
+Pages 20, 21: Mr. Ruskin seems to me to draw most strongly the very
+comparison to which he objects. Surely the kingdom of Christ _is_ the
+kingdom of His Father. (Rev. xi. 15, xii. 10; Eph. v. 5.) Does not an
+unwillingness to accept the true divinity of our Lord underlie this
+passage?
+
+
+LETTER VIII
+
+Page 25: There is surely a mistake here. Personal sanctification and
+national prosperity are very different things. A nation has no existence
+except in this world; therefore its prosperity is the chief end to be
+aimed at; and this is no doubt promoted by the holiness of its people.
+But a man has another life hereafter; and comfort and wealth are not the
+end of his being. If granted, they are means to his sanctification, not
+_vice versâ_.
+
+It seems to me that Mr. Ruskin in this Letter writes somewhat
+recklessly, and that he must have been singularly unfortunate in his
+experience of preachers if he has never heard a faithful sermon against
+covetousness, which is the idolatry of our age. On page 26 he seems to
+fall into a great error in supposing that the proclamation of a free
+pardon for sin tends to encourage it. If a man is to be delivered from
+the power of his sins, he must first be delivered from the guilt of
+them.
+
+No doubt the grace of God has been abused by some; and St. Paul himself
+felt that his doctrine was open to such abuse (Rom. vi. 1, 15). It is
+not, I think, just to attribute the corruption of our great cities to
+the teaching of the clergy. It is rather to be ascribed to the absence
+of that teaching.
+
+
+LETTER X
+
+Whatever justice there may be (and no doubt there is much) in Mr.
+Ruskin's accusations against us clergy, he is surely under an entire
+misapprehension in the charge which he here makes against our Liturgy.
+
+Our Prayer Book is doubtless constructed for the use of believing
+Christians, and is not fitted for the impenitent; but its adaptation to
+the needs of the repentant publican and of the advanced Christian is
+most wonderful. And that a form of prayer may be so adapted is surely
+proved by the Lord's Prayer itself, which Mr. Ruskin says is the _first_
+thing to be taught to all, and which, with all his practice in thinking,
+he feels that he cannot adequately expound.
+
+Surely the repetition of a confession of unholiness casts no slur upon
+the efficacy of our prayers for holiness when we recognize that holiness
+is progressive, and that spiritual growth may express itself not merely
+in new words, but in a heartier utterance of the old ones. As to the
+particular expression, "there is no health in us," it needs either the
+explanation of St. Paul--"I know that in me, _that is, in my flesh_,
+dwelleth no good thing,"--or else to be understood according to the old
+meaning of "health," viz., "_saving health_," _salvation_, _deliverance_
+(Psalm cxix. 123, Prayer Book; Isa. lviii. 8; Jer. viii. 15).
+
+It needs further to be remarked that repentance is not only a single
+definite act, but a state of mind.
+
+I think that underlying all these comments of Mr. Ruskin on the Lord's
+Prayer is a failure to recognize the truth of man's fall.
+
+Human nature is a ruin, not to be restored by a rearrangement of its
+fragments. God has provided a remedy, by sending His Son to be the
+foundation of a new spiritual building; and every man who is to be built
+upon that foundation must himself become a new creature by the
+operation of the Holy Ghost. All efforts to improve humanity in the
+mass, without the renewal of each separate soul, must fail; and no doubt
+the clergy often fall into this mistake.
+
+The Lord's Prayer is not the prayer of all mankind as they are by
+nature. It is a prayer to the possession of which they are brought by
+regeneration, and to the enjoyment by conversion.
+
+ E. H. M'NEILE.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ P. T. OUVRY.
+
+
+On the meaning of usury, I would add a few words. I start with this
+proposition. There is nothing contrary to the will of God for one free
+man to buy from another free man anything he wants. I have two
+houses,--one I live in, one I let. My tenant pays the market rent of
+houses to me, and so both parties are benefited. I have two thousand
+pounds. I have no capacity, or opportunity, or desire to use more than
+one thousand pounds in trade on my own account. My neighbour has energy
+and activity to use more money than he has in trade. He gladly offers me
+five per cent. for my spare thousand pounds. I willingly lend it on
+those terms. He makes ten per cent. by using it. He gives me five pounds
+and has five pounds for himself. If this be usury, it is lawful and
+right.
+
+A number of small cultivators of land have no capital. A money-lender
+supplies what they require on condition that they sell their crops to
+him at a price which he is able to fix. From the circumstances of the
+case the money-lender makes an enormous profit. The cultivator has
+barely the necessaries of life. This is usury, in the bad sense of the
+term, but is more correctly called oppression or extortion.
+
+Again, a man lends money to ignorant inexperienced youths, on promise of
+repayment when they come of age. This, too, is oppression or extortion.
+
+Similar oppression is witnessed when bad houses are let to poor people
+at high rents.
+
+It is not, then, that usury, in the sense of oppression or extortion, is
+inherent in money-lending; but it belongs equally to every transaction
+between man and man, where any unrighteous dealing is practised.
+
+ P. T. OUVRY.
+
+
+
+
+ GRANGE-OVER-SANDS,
+ _October 1st, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I protested strongly yesterday against our remarks,
+made on the spur of the moment, being printed and submitted to Mr.
+Ruskin's criticism, and what I said then I feel as strongly still.
+
+But I have no objection to send, as a comment on his Letters, a volume
+of sermons which I published last year, because I think that, in that
+upon the hallowing of God's name, I have not taken the restricted view
+which Mr. Ruskin accused the clergy of taking, and I think also that
+(except in the sermon upon the doctrine of the Trinity, which was
+written before the others, and is tinged with the prejudices of early
+training), I have set forth God the Father as a Being of infinite,
+tender, fatherly love.
+
+So far as snails may follow in the footsteps of greyhounds, and bats
+look in the same direction as eagles, I think some of us clergymen are
+getting our feet and our eyes into the same track as Mr. Ruskin's.
+
+It seems to me that all of us who think upon religious matters, laity or
+clergy, whether men of genius or commonplace people, are feeling our way
+at present to something better and truer. Men like Mr. Ruskin, like
+steamships, dart on to their destination; and feebler minds, like
+sailing vessels, are a good deal at the mercy of the _popularis aura_
+and the winds of doctrine, but both are on their way to the same point.
+
+I send the volume by the same post as this letter.
+
+ Yours very faithfully,
+ H. R. S.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ A. G. K. SIMPSON, _Brighton_.
+
+
+We are convinced that the love of God is the originating cause of all
+His dealings with mankind, and are glad to meet him on the broad
+platform of "Our Father which art in heaven;" only premising that it is
+a platform not new to us, but on which we have long taken our stand.
+
+But beyond these somewhat general statements of our faith, I doubt
+whether it would be possible to put Divine truth into such plain words
+as would meet with general acceptance. In proportion to the _minuteness_
+would be the _disagreement_. To take one great truth (perhaps the
+greatest of all), would it be possible to put forth a plain and simple
+statement, such as all, or the majority, would receive, of the
+Atonement? Such a mind as Mr. Ruskin's would not be content with the
+forensic view more popular some years ago than now. Wiser, it seems to
+me, it is to accept some such teaching as that of Coleridge in "Aids to
+Reflection." "The mysterious act, the operative cause," he says, "is
+transcendent." "_Factum est_," and beyond the information contained in
+the enunciation of the fact, it can be characterized only by its
+consequences. It is these consequences which (according to Coleridge)
+are illustrated by the four metaphors:--
+
+ 1. Sin-offering or expiation.
+
+ 2. Reconciliation.
+
+ 3. Redemption.
+
+ 4. Payment of a debt.
+
+Now, would not a plain, a simple statement, be apt to press the metaphor
+too far, and attempt to put into words one aspect of the truth as though
+it were the whole? Such a reverent mind as Bishop Butler's reproved the
+curiosity which sought to find out the manner of the atonement. "I do
+not find," he said, "that it is declared in the Scriptures." And yet the
+atonement is only _one_, though perhaps the _chief_, of the many points
+of which a true and simple statement must take cognizance. It would be
+comparatively easy for the private clergyman to put into words his
+thoughts on this subject or that, but then he would be continually
+liable to have it urged against him that he had not sufficiently
+considered some given point--had not walked round it, and seen it in all
+its bearings; that his view was inadequate and incomplete; and, being
+fallible and human, some of the objections would doubtless be true, and
+the simple and plain statement be, in that respect at least,
+misguiding.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ G. W. WALL, _Bickerstaffe_.
+
+
+ LETTER II
+
+This Letter professes to contain an "exact question," which is somewhat
+singularly inexactly put. In its strict grammatical form it asks for a
+definition of the members of a Clerical Council, and their business as
+such. This "exact question" is in fact an illustration of the fallacy of
+asking two questions in one, though a question demanding to be answered
+with "mathematical" precision should have been set with mathematical
+accuracy. But here at the outset a protest must be entered against being
+called upon to answer a question set in ambiguous words and misleading
+phrases, and based upon assumptions which those questioned would reject.
+It is impossible to deal with a so-called "axiomatic" question which
+instantly passes into a cloudy rhetorical illustration.
+
+"The attached servants of a particular State." Does that expression
+mean, "England, with all thy faults, I love thee still"? or, is it used
+in the same sense as "attached to the staff"? But are there many of the
+clergy who would say, "I am an attached and salaried servant of the
+State, and nothing more?" Are there many who would allow that they were
+"salaried" by the State at all? Are there many who would grant that they
+had been "examined" and "numbered" and admitted into a "body of
+trustworthy persons" either by the State or by its agents? And yet all
+these previous questions must be answered before we can consider at all
+the "axiomatic" question which the clergy are "earnestly called upon" to
+solve. The question set down for solution implies some such inquiries as
+these: Is not the Church of England merely a Department of the State of
+England? Does not a clergyman belong to the Ecclesiastical Service just
+as an _employé_ of the Treasury, or the Home Office, or the Post Office,
+belongs to the Civil Service? For example, the authorities at Chamouni
+examine and approve of certain men as guides for mountaineering: does
+not the English State similarly examine and approve of certain men as
+guides for England and the English "in the way known of all good men
+that leadeth unto life"? A most fallacious employment of a "universal"
+for a "particular," for either the clergy must be excluded from the
+number of "all good men," or the assertion that all good men agree in
+their knowledge falls to the ground, seeing that in the fourth Letter
+the clergy are charged with not having "determined quite clearly" what
+the way that leadeth unto life may be.
+
+But taking this Alpine illustration for what it may be worth, we may
+ask, "What does it mean?" Is it not intended to exalt practical
+questions, and to depreciate all doctrine and dogma and theological
+opinion, either from its liability on the one hand to be narrow or
+insular, "Chamounist or Grindelwaldist," or on the other from its
+tendency to be vague and transcendental, dealing with "celestial
+mountains" and unfathomable "crevasses"? Will it not admit of some such
+paraphrase as this, "Your teachings as to Episcopacy or
+Congregationalism, seven sacraments or two, and the like, are mere local
+opinions, and so away with them; your doctrines as to the Holy Trinity,
+the Incarnation, and the like, are mere transcendentalism, and so away
+with them also,--
+
+ 'For modes of faith let zealous bigots fight,
+ He can't be wrong whose life is in the right.'"
+
+Still it may be allowable to hint that the qualifications of a "guide"
+as laid down in this Letter are somewhat peculiar. It might have been
+supposed by a plain man that a Chamounist guide was expected to know at
+least something as to the localities of the Mer de Glace, the Jardin, or
+the Grand Mulets, but he is seemingly to rise superior to any
+"Chamounist opinions on geography," and to be prepared to rely only upon
+a universal science of locality and athletics, a reliance which has been
+the fruitful cause of mountaineering fatalities.
+
+The reply which most Clerical Councils would return respecting the
+"axiomatic" question of this Letter would probably be, "We cannot answer
+a fallacy; we are not careful to answer thee in this matter."
+
+
+ LETTER III
+
+A second question is now propounded respecting the Christian Gospel.
+"The Gospel of Christ" is spoken of in a connection which seems to
+indicate that Luther and Augustine were equally, in the writer's
+opinion, the setters forth of a "gospel." Is this an unintentional
+disclosure of his estimate of our blessed Lord,--"Rabbi, we know that
+Thou art a teacher come from God," and no more than that? For the eighth
+Letter contains a sneer at the Gospel that He is our Advocate with the
+Father, as one to mend the world with. A confused question follows,
+which may mean either, that it is in the first place desirable that the
+Gospel should be put into plain words, or, that the first principles of
+the Gospel should be put into plain words. Its probable meaning is, "Is
+it not desirable that religious teaching should be divested of any
+mysteries?" The extraordinary supposition that the Gospel is intended to
+be set forth in the Thirty-nine Articles can only be equalled by a
+supposition that a treatise on military tactics is embodied in the
+Articles of War. Perhaps even some of the axiomatic principles of
+mathematics, such as that "a point is that which hath no parts," though
+laid down in "plain words and short terms," might sorely perplex "simple
+persons."
+
+But several fallacies underlie this second question. The fallacy that
+the moral principles of our nature are necessarily connected with the
+extent of our intellectual capacities; the fallacy that Divine Truths
+can be adequately expressed through the inaccurate instrument of human
+language; the fallacy that deep things are necessarily made plain by the
+use of plain words; the fallacy that everything upon which we act is
+necessarily understood. A plain man does not refuse to use the telegraph
+because he may know nothing about the Correlation of Force, or a simple
+person to travel because "space" is beyond his comprehension. If the
+Gospel is, as St. Paul says it is, a revelation of the power of God unto
+salvation, an amount of mystery must necessarily surround it. Since it
+is impossible that the Divine Nature should be to us other than a
+mystery, a revelation of Divine purposes such as is the Gospel as
+understood by the Church, must remain mysterious also. Only upon the
+supposition that our Lord was the teacher of a high but still human
+morality can we remove all mystery from the Christian Gospel, if it
+still deserve the name. Such teaching might be conveyed in plain words
+and short terms, but it would cease to be a Gospel which angels desire
+to look into, and could hardly be described as the "manifold wisdom of
+God," or be the story of the "love of Christ, which passeth knowledge."
+
+The Gospel, as the Church understands it, rests upon the revealed fact
+of the Incarnation, or the union of the Infinite with the Finite, that
+He who is very God of very God became man in order to introduce the
+Divine possibility of manhood being made to partake of the Divine
+nature; and so long as the triumphal chant ascends that "the Catholic
+Faith is this," so long will the Church's Faith be veiled indeed with
+mystery, and so long will she continue to gather within her bounds the
+humble and holy men of heart, who are content to say, "I cannot
+understand: I love." That "God sent His only-begotten Son into the
+world that we might live through Him" are short and plain words enough,
+and Gospel enough, surely, but the depth of their meaning is
+unfathomable by even the most cultivated understanding, to which the
+power of God and the wisdom of God may appear to be but foolishness.
+
+
+ LETTER IX
+
+This Letter, after endorsing the expressions of the preceding one, deals
+apparently with Capital and Labour. The clergy, if not required to
+divide the inheritance among their brethren, or to actually serve
+tables, are, taking "Property is theft" as their text, to resolutely and
+daily inquire how the dinners of their flock are earned. The gist of the
+Letter seems to be that the worker earns and the capitalist steals his
+dinner. It is really possible that the clergy do constantly speak the
+truth, boldly rebuke vice, and patiently suffer for the truth's sake,
+even though they may not subscribe to all the articles of some peculiar
+schemes of social science, nor hold some singular doctrines as to
+political economy. Doubtless were they to assimilate their conduct to
+that of an injudicious district-visitor, they would have to take a new
+view of "life and its sacraments," whatever this expression may mean.
+
+It would seem as if the writer had yet to learn that a Christian Church
+may exist teaching the most dogmatic definitions of doctrine, binding,
+even in this respect, burdens on men's shoulders grievous to be borne,
+while its members may be patterns of self-denial in "offices of temporal
+ministry to the poor." He does not appear to regard with favour the
+"Evangelistic sect of the English Church;" if this is intended for the
+"Evangelical" sect, Charles Kingsley could say, in a certain place, of
+its founders, "They were inspired by a strange new instinct that God had
+bidden them 'to clothe the hungry and feed the naked.'" Yet these men
+thought that "justification by faith only" was the Gospel they were "to
+carry to mend the world with, forsooth."
+
+
+ LETTER XI
+
+This concluding Letter calls but for slight remark,--of many portions we
+feel _O si sic omnia_! That there is much sorrowful truth underlying the
+unmeasured denunciations which have gone before few will care to deny.
+Few there are who will not pray to be kept from the evils which the
+writer discerns, and against which he inveighs. Such will be the first
+to regret that the Letters, as they read them, seem to fall short of the
+fulness of the Catholic Faith. "The holy teachers of all nations:" was
+our blessed Lord but one of them? There is nothing in the Letters to
+show that "the full force and meaning" of Gospel teaching is concerned
+with anything beyond wealth, and comfort, and national prosperity, and
+domestic peace. Preaching the acceptable year of the Lord is something
+more surely than an invective against usury.
+
+We read that in old times Bezaleel was filled for his own work with the
+Spirit of God, but we do not read that he aspired to become a religious
+teacher; and when we are told by one eminent in Art that a Church
+nineteen centuries old has yet to learn that the "will of the Lord" is a
+sanctification which brings comfort and wealth in its train, we think of
+a Moses who esteemed the reproach of Christ greater riches than all the
+treasures of Egypt, and then of a Paul who counted all things but loss
+for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus his Lord.
+
+ G. W. WALL.
+
+
+
+
+ _From_ OXONIENSIS.
+
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--Many thanks for the pamphlet. You ask me to send you
+any remarks I may have to make on the Letters, and I gather from your
+note at the beginning of the Letters as they now stand, that you intend
+making use of any remarks sent you that may commend themselves to your
+judgment. I am not vain enough to think mine of any special value. I
+will, however, write you my feelings about them, encouraged to do so by
+your statement in the note to the pamphlet, that the use made of
+remarks sent you will be anonymous, if it is so desired.
+
+First, as regards the general tone of the Letters. You tell me that the
+majority of the comments you have received have been hostile--people not
+taking their medicine without making wry faces. I am only surprised at
+the gentleness of the Letters, and I believe that if anyone will take
+the trouble to put down for himself on paper the sum of their contents,
+he will find it as difficult to gainsay as for careless readers it is
+easy to cavil at. On the other hand, the "hostile spirit" is readily
+provoked by the way in which some of the teaching of the Letters is put.
+Passages like the sixth paragraph in Letter X. appear an objectionable
+joke to some--perhaps to most--people; they do not see that it is really
+a serious jest, so put for brevity's sake, and that Ruskin might have
+put the same note to it as he has put to a passage in the "Crown of Wild
+Olive," p. 85, 8vo ed.: "Quite serious all this, though it reads like
+jest." I remember once asking Ruskin if his apparent joking in some
+Oxford lectures was not likely to lessen his influence, and he at once
+said to me, "Remember that most of my apparent jokes are serious,
+_ghastly_ jests." I think he would be less often misunderstood, if this
+were more often understood.
+
+Your own preface marks the two main points in the spirit of the Letters.
+They are sternly practical, and at the same time their standard is one
+of an ideal perfection. People don't see that because the goal cannot be
+reached, the road towards it can still be trodden, and therefore they
+apply to the road an epithet which applies only to the goal. In this
+respect Ruskin's teaching might be mottoed with George Herbert's--
+
+ "Who aimeth at the sky
+ Shoots higher much than he that means a tree."
+
+In fact, Ruskin's teaching, like that of the Bible, is not unpractical,
+but _unpractised_.
+
+I will now take the Letters in detail. The first four of them are merely
+introductory to the main matter of the eleven. In these first five two
+questions are asked--
+
+1. What is a clergyman of the Church of England? And to this the
+suggested answer is (whom does it offend?), "A teacher of the Gospel of
+Christ to all nations."
+
+2. What is the teaching of the Gospel he is to teach? What is that
+teaching, clearly and simply put?
+
+Then Letter IV. suggests that the Lord's Prayer may be taken as
+containing the cardinal points of that teaching, containing not all that
+is to be learnt, but what all have to learn. And so we come to Letter
+V.; and I tried, in reading the Letters for myself, to do for them what
+Letter III. asks clergymen to do for the Gospel.
+
+Letter V.--A clergyman's first duty is to make the Lord's Prayer clear
+and living to his people. This is what Ruskin has elsewhere insisted on
+in other matters--"clear," know your duty and your belief; "living,"
+realize it in your life--realize it "as a Captain's order, to be obeyed"
+("Crown of Wild Olive," Introduction, p. 13. The whole of this
+Introduction reads well with these Letters). Then the first clause of
+the Prayer is set forth as putting before us God as a loving Father.
+
+Letter VI.--"Hallowed be Thy name." How do we fulfil the hope in our
+lives? How do we betray it? Not in swearing only, as we are apt to
+think, but in the blasphemy of false and hypocritical prayer to, and
+praise of, _preaching about_ God (last paragraph of the Letter).
+Clergymen, it is added, can prevent openly wicked men from being in
+their congregations (they are supposed to do so: Rubrics 2 and 3 before
+the Holy Communion Service); they can not only compel the wicked poor
+into, but expel the wicked rich out of, churches. God sees the heart:
+the clergy should look to the hands and lips.
+
+Letter VII.--"Thy kingdom come:"--not an allusion to the second coming
+of the Son, which we cannot hasten, but to the coming of the kingdom of
+God the Father, which we can. This is again illustrated by the "Crown of
+Wild Olive" (I daresay it is by others of Ruskin's books, but it is
+convenient to refer chiefly to one, and that the one which contains what
+he calls his most biblical lecture), p. 56: "Observe it is a kingdom
+that is to come to us; we are not to go to it. Also it is not to be a
+kingdom of the dead, but of the living. Also it is not to come all at
+once, but quietly ... without observation. _Also it is not to come
+outside of us, but in our hearts: 'the kingdom of God is within you.'_"
+This is the sense in which we can hasten _it_.
+
+Letter VIII. begins with a hit at the pleasure priests take in their
+priesthood's dignity, and at their avoidance of its unpleasant duties,
+and at their sometimes wearisome preaching.
+
+Have they ever taught "Thy will be done," as it should be--1. In our own
+sanctification; 2. In understanding that will, and doing it, and
+striving to get it done (knowing their duty and doing it, and it alone)?
+
+The remarks about the mediatorial (absolving-from-punishment) and the
+pastoral (purging-from-sin) functions of a "pastor," seem to me quite
+admirable.
+
+The end of the Letter is subsequently amplified, Letter X.
+
+Letter IX.--"Give us this day our daily bread." Yes, but we must work
+for it. "The man that will not work, neither shall he eat." A cardinal
+point with Ruskin: "But if you do" (_i.e._, wish for God's kingdom),
+"you must do more than pray for it, you must work for it" ("Crown of
+Wild Olive," p. 56).
+
+And the clergyman has to teach (Letter IX. goes on) what that work is
+and how it is to be done; and the life, to which their teaching should
+lead, is one "moderate in its self-indulgence, wide in its offices of
+temporal ministry to the poor," in the absence of which, prayer for
+harvest is mere blasphemy. For the spiritual bread is the first thing,
+and a clergyman's first message, "Choose ye this day whom ye will
+serve."
+
+Letter X.--"Forgive us our trespasses." The explanation of trespasses,
+and substitution of _debts_ for it, is admirable ("Dimitte nobis
+_debita_ nostra"), and admirably illustrated by the sins of omission
+being condemned in Christ's judgment,--"I was hungry, and ye gave Me no
+meat."
+
+The remarks on the "pleasantness" of the English liturgy recall those on
+the avoidance of unpleasantness by the English clergy in Letter VIII.
+
+I pass over the notes on the advantage of "forms of prayer," and come to
+the end of Letter X. and Letter XI., which go together, and say
+practically, Pray honestly or not at all. "Faithful prayer implies
+always correlative exertions;" "dishonest prayer is blasphemy of the
+worst kind."
+
+"Crown of Wild Olive," p. 55, again: "Everybody in this room has been
+taught to pray daily, 'Thy kingdom come.' Now, if we hear a man swear in
+the streets, we think it very wrong, and say he 'takes God's name in
+vain.' But there is a twenty times worse way of taking His name in vain
+than that. It is to _ask God for what we don't want_. He doesn't like
+that sort of prayer. If you don't want a thing, don't ask for it; such
+asking is the worst mockery of your King you can insult Him with; the
+soldiers striking Him on the head was nothing to that. If you do not
+wish for His kingdom, don't pray for it."
+
+In fact, prayer is worse than useless if not sincere, and it is
+insincere if not carried out in the life of the "pray-er." Thus, "One
+hour in the execution of justice is worth seventy years of (insincere)
+prayer" (Mahometan maxim, "Crown of Wild Olive," p. 49).
+
+I must stop. Only the fifth paragraph in Letter XI., about parents
+looking for "opportunities" for their children, is exactly parallel
+with "Sesame and Lilies," 8vo edition, p. 2 (Sub. 1, § 2), which might
+be added in an illustrative note. I must apologize for my long and
+rambling letter, but if it is of the least service to you I shall be
+content. I feel how inadequate it is to what I meant it to be, only I
+have no time just now to do more than write, as this letter is
+written--at the point of the pen.
+
+ OXONIENSIS.
+
+
+
+
+ LETTERS FROM
+
+ BRANTWOOD-ON-THE-LAKE
+
+ TO THE
+
+ VICARAGE OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS
+
+
+
+
+ PREFACE
+
+
+Some apology will naturally be expected for setting the following
+letters before the searching eye of a critical and possibly censorious
+public. I can only plead that the suggestion of their publication did
+not emanate from myself (for the idea of making these letters public
+property had never once in fifteen years crossed my mind), but was made
+to me by friends to whom it appeared that much in these letters is
+strongly characteristic of Mr. Ruskin, and illustrates (much too
+indulgently, alas!) the estimate he is good enough to form of a
+correspondent who does not to this day clearly understand to what happy
+circumstance he is indebted for so fortunate a partiality. At the same
+time it must be confessed that _Laudari a viro laudato_ is a harmless
+ambition for the possession of a stimulus which is good for every soul
+of man.
+
+I will say no more upon that subject, lest my self-depreciation should
+be set down to vanity. Nevertheless it has always been a source of
+innocent pleasure to me that I have been enabled to bring my ship
+without damage through so perilous a voyage to port in a safe and
+honourable harbourage.
+
+The matters discussed in the following letters range only over a narrow
+field; but it will be found that they present a truly life-like picture
+of the writer with his shrewd common-sense and deeper wisdom, enlivened
+in no small measure by a quick impulsiveness which is sometimes rather
+startling. Some of his sudden sallies serve the purpose of the
+condiments, which displeasing if taken alone, give piquancy to our
+ordinary food.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ 1.
+
+
+ _July 8th, 1879._
+
+MY DEAR MR. MALLESON,--You must make no public announcement of any paper
+by me. I am not able to count on my powers of mind for an hour; and will
+absolutely take no responsibility. What I do send you--if anything--will
+be in the form of a series of short letters to yourself, of which you
+have already the first: This the second for the sake of continuing the
+order unbroken contains the next following question which I should like
+to ask. If when the sequence of letters is in your possession you like
+to read any part or parts of them as a subject of discussion at your
+afternoon meeting, I shall be glad and grateful.
+
+ Ever faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 2.
+
+
+ [_Undated._]
+
+I am so ashamed of keeping R.'s book--but it's impossible for me to look
+at it properly till I have done my lecture, so much must be left undone
+of it anyhow * * *
+
+Yes--you were glad to find we were at one in many thoughts. So was I.
+But we are not yet, you know, at one in our _sight_ of this world and
+the dark ways of it. I hope to have you for a St. George's soldier one
+day.
+
+
+
+
+ 3.
+
+
+ _23rd July, 1879._
+
+Thanks for your note and your kind feelings. But you ought to know more
+about me.
+
+I profess to be a teacher; as you profess also.
+
+But we teach on totally different methods.
+
+_You_ believe what you wish to believe; teach that it is wicked to doubt
+it, and remain at rest and in much self-satisfaction.
+
+_I_ believe what I find to be true, whether I like or dislike it. And I
+teach other people that the chief of all wickednesses is to tell lies in
+God's service, and to disgrace our Master and destroy His sheep as
+_involuntary_ Wolves.
+
+_I_, therefore, am in perpetual effort to learn and discern--in
+perpetual Unrest and Dissatisfaction with myself.
+
+But it would simply require you to do twenty years of such hard work as
+I have done before you could in any true sense speak a word to me on
+such matters. You could not use a word in my sense. It would always mean
+to you something different.
+
+For instance--one of my quite bye works in learning my business of a
+teacher--was to read the New Testament through in the earliest Greek MS.
+(eleventh century) which I could get hold of. I examined every syllable
+of it and have more notes of various readings and on the real meanings
+of perverted passages than you would get through in a year's work. But I
+should require you to do the same work before I would discuss a text
+with you. From that and such work in all kinds I have formed opinions
+which you could no more move than you could Coniston Old Man. They may
+be wrong, God knows; I _trust_ in them infinitely less than you do in
+those which you have formed simply by refusing to examine--or to
+think--or to know what is doing in the world about you; but you cannot
+stir them.
+
+I very very rarely make presents of my books. If people are inclined to
+learn from them, I say to them as a physician would--Pay me my fee--you
+will not obey me if I give you advice for nothing.
+
+But I should like a kind neighbour like you to know something about me,
+and I have therefore desired my publisher to send you one[21] of my many
+books which, after doing the work that I have done, you would have to
+read before you could really use words in my meaning.
+
+ [21] Crown of Wild Olive.--ED.
+
+ If you will read the introduction carefully, and especially dwell
+ on the 10th to 15th lines of the 15th page, you will at least know
+ me a little better than to think I believe in my own
+ resurrection--but not in Christ's: and if you look to the final
+ essay on War, you may find some things in it which will be of
+ interest to you in your own[22] work.
+
+ [22] Translating some of Erckmann-Chatrian's.--ED.
+
+
+
+
+ 4.
+
+
+ VENICE, _8th September, 1879_.
+
+* * * * There is nothing whatever said as far as I remember in the July
+'Fors,' about "people's surrendering their judgment." A colonel does not
+surrender his judgment in obeying his general, nor a soldier in obeying
+his colonel. But there can be no army where they _act_ on their own
+judgments.
+
+The Society of Jesuits is a splendid proof of the power of obedience,
+but its curse is falsehood. When the Master of St. George's Company bids
+you lie, it will be time to compare our discipline to the Jesuits. We
+are their precise opposites--fiercely and at all costs frank, while they
+are calmly and for all interests lying.
+
+
+
+
+ 5.
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON,
+ _July 30th, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I fear I have kept the proofs too long, but I wanted
+to look atain. I am confirmed in my impression that the book will do
+much good.[23] But I think it would have done more if you had written
+the lives of two or three of your parishioners. Such an answer would I
+give to a painter who sent to me a picture of the Last Supper. "You had
+better, it seems to me, have painted a Harvest Home." I am gravely
+doubtful of the possibility, in these days, of writing or painting on
+such subjects, advisedly and securely.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+ [23] Life and Work of Jesus Christ. Ward & Lock.--ED.
+
+
+
+
+ 6.
+
+
+ _July 31st, 1879._
+
+I have received this week the two most astonishing letters I ever yet
+received in my life. And one of them is yours, read this
+morning--telling me--that you don't think you could write the life of an
+old woman! Yet you think you _can_ write the life of Christ!
+
+If you can at all explain this state of your mind to me I will tell you
+more distinctly what I think of the piece I saw. But I don't think you
+will communicate the thought to your publisher; and I never meant you to
+use my former one in that manner.
+
+Mind a publisher thinks only of money, and I know nothing of
+saleableness. The pause in my other letters is one of pure astonishment
+at you; which at present occupies all the time I have to spare on the
+subject, and has culminated to-day.
+
+I am so puzzled. I can scarcely think of anything else till you tell me
+what you mean in the bit about being "called late."
+
+Have you done no work in the vineyard 'yet' then?
+
+
+
+
+ 7.
+
+
+ _August 2nd, 1879._
+
+I am still simply speechless with astonishment at you. It is no question
+of your right to the best I can say; it is all at your command. But for
+the present my tongue cleaves to the roof of my mouth. I can only tell you
+with all the strength I have to read and understand and believe 2 Esdras
+iv. 2, 20, 21.[24]
+
+ [24] Thy heart hath gone too far in this world, and thinkest thou
+ to comprehend the way of the most High? Then answered he me, and
+ said, Thou hast given a right judgment, but why judgest thou not
+ thyself also. For like as the ground is given unto the wood, and
+ the sea to his floods: even so they that dwell upon the earth may
+ understand nothing, but that which is upon the earth: and he only
+ that dwelleth above the heavens, may understand the things that are
+ above the height of the heavens.
+
+
+
+
+ 8.
+
+
+ _August 4th, 1879._
+
+It is just because you undertook the task so _happily_, that I should
+have thought you unfit to write the life of a Man of Sorrows, even had
+he been a Man only. But your last letter, remember, claims inspiration
+for your guide, and recognizes a personal call at sixty, as if the Call
+to the ministry had been none, and the receiving the Holy Ghost by
+imposition of hands an empty ceremony.
+
+In writing the life of a parishioner and in remitting or retaining their
+sins you would in my conception have been fulfilling your appointed
+work. But I cannot conceive the claim to be a fit Evangelist without
+more proof of miraculous appointment than you are conscious of. I know
+you to be conscientious, yes--but I think the judicial doom of this
+country is to have conscience alike of its Priests and Prophets
+_hardened_. Why should any letter of mine make you anxious if you had
+indeed conscience of inspiration?
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 9.
+
+
+ _August 7th._
+
+I hope to be able soon now to resume the series of letters; but it seems
+to me there is no need whatever of more than three or four more
+respecting the last clauses of the Lord's Prayer. Those in your hands
+contain questions enough, if seriously entertained, to occupy twenty
+meetings; and I could only hope that some one of them might be carefully
+taken up by your friends. I think, however, in case of the clerical
+feeling being too strong, that I must ask you, if you print letters at
+all, to print them without omission. And if you do not print them, to
+return them to me for my own expansion and arrangement.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 10.
+
+
+ _August 9th._
+
+I have got to work on the letters again; it would make me nervous to
+think of all these plans of yours. Suppose you leave all that till you
+see what the first debate comes to?[25] And in the meantime I'll finish
+as best I can.
+
+ [25] My clerical friends and brethren must not be displeased with
+ me if I here mention the fact that at the meeting of twenty-three
+ clergy where I _proposed_ to read Mr. Ruskin's letters to them, I
+ was only authorized to do so by a majority of two. I can scarcely
+ describe the dismay and consternation with which the letters
+ themselves were received,--though of course not universally, in
+ another meeting of the same number.
+
+
+
+
+ 11.
+
+
+ _September 2nd._
+
+That there are only a hundred copies in that form,[26] is just a reason
+why the book should be in your library, where it will be enjoyed and
+useful; and not in mine, where it would not be opened once in a
+twelvemonth. It is one of the advantages of a small house (and it has
+many) that one is compelled to consider of all one's books whether they
+are in use or not.
+
+ [26] Grosart, "Poems of Christopher Harvey."
+
+I yesterday ordered a 'Fors' to be sent you containing in its close the
+most important piece of a religious character in the book--this I hope
+you will also allow to stay on your shelves. The two that I sent with
+this note contain so much that is saucy that I only send them in case
+you want to look at the challenge referred to in the Letters to the
+Bishop of Manchester, see October, 1877, pp. 322, 323, and January 1875,
+p. 11. You can keep as long as you like, but please take care of them,
+as my index is not yet done. The next letter will come before the week
+end, but it's a difficult one.
+
+
+
+
+ 12.
+
+
+ THE VICARAGE,
+ BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS,
+ _September 4th, 1879_.
+
+MY DEAR MR. RUSKIN,--These parish engagements having been discharged
+which have taken up my time very closely since I came back from
+Brighton, I am returning to your letters, and I think you would like to
+know what I am doing. I am copying them down, first, as I can read them
+aloud better in my own handwriting, and secondly, because I shall not
+place the originals in the printer's hands.
+
+Then many thoughts arise in my mind as I re-peruse them, and I must
+needs (and I think I am allowed) give expression to my thoughts. Hence
+each letter is followed by my own comments or reflections upon it. But
+this need not make you feel nervous. On the whole there is much
+agreement between your modes of thought on religious subjects and my
+own.
+
+If this is thought a piece of cool assurance, I may reply in the words
+or sense of Euclid, That similar triangles may have the most various
+areas. I am not equal to you, but I claim to be similar. These comments
+I sometimes think I ought to show to you before publication; but perhaps
+you will agree with me that if I am fit to be trusted at all, I had
+better be left unconstrained. I shall certainly come to you first, if I
+find myself seriously at variance with you, which has not happened yet
+as far as the first clause of the Lord's Prayer. Then it is likely that
+I shall read the letters before two or three Clerical Societies,[27]
+including my own, the Furness.
+
+ [27] At Liverpool and Brighton.
+
+The opinions delivered by those clergy it will be my duty, and I hope it
+will be my pleasure, to collect and to record. I propose also to invite
+the clergy who have not time or opportunity to speak in the meeting to
+write to me, and I will use my best judgment in selecting from their
+correspondence all that seems worth preserving.
+
+I am very sensible that this is a most delicate and responsible task
+that is laid upon me, and I wonder to find myself so engaged. It will
+need tact, discretion, and kindness of heart, and I trust I may be
+endued with the necessary qualifications to a much larger extent than I
+think I naturally possess.
+
+I find no small comfort at the foot of the first page of the Preface to
+"Sesame and Lilies." There I feel I am at one with you.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ 13.
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _September 5th, 1879_.
+
+I shall be delighted to have the comments, though it will be well first
+to have the series of letters done--the last but one is coming
+to-morrow. I have only written them in the sense of your sympathy in
+most points, and am sure you will make the best possible use of them.
+
+
+
+
+ 14.
+
+
+ _September 7th, 1879._
+
+It is rather comic that your first reply to my challenge concerning
+usury should be a prospectus of a Company[28] wishing to make 5 per
+cent. out of Broughton poor men's ignorance. You couldn't have sent me a
+project I should have regarded with more abomination.
+
+ [28] A projected Public Hall.
+
+
+
+
+ 15.
+
+
+ _September 9th, 1879._
+
+There is absolutely no debate possible as to what usury is any more
+than what adultery is. The Church has only been polluted by the
+indulgence of it since the 16th century. Usury is _any kind whatever_ of
+interest on loan, and it is the essential modern form of Satan.
+
+I send you an old book full of sound and eternal teaching on this
+matter--please take care of it as a friend's gift, and one I would not
+lose for its weight in gold. Please read first the Sermon by Bishop
+Jewel, page 14, and then the rest at your pleasure or your leisure.
+
+_No halls are wanted_, they are all rich men's excuses for destroying
+the home life of England.
+
+The public library should be at the village school (and I could put ten
+thousand pounds' worth of books into a single cupboard), and all that is
+done for education should be pure Gift. Do you think that this rich
+England, which spends fifty millions a year in drink and gunpowder,
+can't educate her poor without being paid interest for her Charity?
+
+ * * * * *
+
+At the time of writing this the following letters passed between Mr.
+Ruskin and myself:--
+
+
+
+
+ 16.
+
+
+ THE VICARAGE,
+ BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS,
+ _September 12th, 1879_.
+
+MY DEAR MR. RUSKIN,--I feel in a great strait. I have before me a task
+of the utmost delicacy, and one before which I feel that I _ought_ to
+shrink,--that of editing your letters, with the accompaniment of
+comments of my own. You trust me, evidently, or you would have laid down
+limitations to guard yourself against misrepresentation. My anxiety is
+lest I should abuse that large and generous confidence you have so
+kindly placed in me. Let me explain my position, as I see it myself.
+
+The series will consist of eleven letters, when you have sent me your
+last. I have now copied nine, and written concisely the views I have
+presumed to form upon each. With every letter I mostly agree and
+sympathize, looking on them as "counsels of perfection," and viewing the
+great subjects you deal with from a far higher standpoint than (in my
+experience) either laymen or clergymen generally view them. All that
+there is in me of _enthusiasm_ rings in answering chords to the notes
+you strike. Yet I do not _always_ agree. But when I do disagree, I
+acknowledge it is because your standard is excessively high--too high
+for practical purposes.
+
+Now, I ask, shall you consider it strictly fair and honourable in me to
+receive your letters, read them or send them to assemblies of clergy,
+gather their views, both adverse and favourable, and add diffident
+animad-versions of my own? If you will allow this to be right, and if
+you will trust to my sense of what is proper, to deal with your letters
+in the spirit of a Christian and a gentleman, then, hoping to fulfil
+your expectations, I shall proceed in my work with a mind more at ease;
+for I could not endure the thought that, after all was done, I had
+written a single sentence or word that had inflicted pain upon you.
+
+Then comes another question. Do you wish to hear or read my comments
+before they are printed? I say frankly, if you trust me, I would prefer
+not; for it would not, perhaps, be pleasant for me either to read your
+praises, or my poor criticisms, to your face. But still, if you wish it,
+I shall be ready at your bidding; for I recognize your right to require
+it. Only I would rather read them to you myself some quiet autumn
+evening or two.
+
+
+
+
+ 17.
+
+
+ _September 13th._
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I am so very grateful for your proposal to edit the
+letters without further reference to me. I think that will be exactly
+the right way; and I believe I can put you at real ease in the doing of
+it by explaining as I can in very few words the kind of carte-blanche I
+should rejoicingly give you.
+
+Interrupted to-day! more to-morrow, with, I hope, the last letter.
+
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 18.
+
+
+ _Sunday, September 14th._
+
+I've nearly done the last letter, but will keep it to-morrow rather than
+finish hurriedly for the earlier post. Your nice little note has just
+come, and I can only say that you cannot please me better than by acting
+with perfect freedom in all ways, and that I only want to see or reply
+to what you wish me for the matter's sake. And surely there is no
+occasion for any thought for waste of type about _me_ personally, except
+only to express your knowledge of my real desire for the health and
+power of the Church. More than this praise you _must_ not give me, for
+I have learned almost everything I may say that I know by my errors.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 19.
+
+
+ _September 16th, 1879._
+
+I should have returned these two recent letters before now, but have
+been looking for the earlier letters which have got mislaid in a general
+rearrangement of all things by a new secretary. I am almost sure to come
+on them to-morrow in my own packing up for town, where I must be for a
+month hence. Please address, &c.
+
+
+
+
+ 20.
+
+
+ [_Undated._]
+
+I am sincerely grieved by the first part of your letter, and scarcely
+like to trouble you with answer to the close. * * * Surely the first
+thing to be done with the letters is to use them as you propose, and you
+may find fifty suggestions, made by persons or circumstances after that,
+worth considering. I do not doubt that I could easily add to the bulk of
+MS.; but should then, I think, stipulate for having the book published
+by my own publisher.
+
+
+
+
+ 21.
+
+
+ _October 13th._
+
+I did not get your kind and interesting letter till yesterday, and can
+only write in utter haste this morning to say that I think nothing can
+possibly be more satisfactory (to me personally at least) and more
+honourable than what you tell me of the wish of the meeting to have the
+letters printed for their quiet consideration.[29]
+
+ [29] Canon Rawnsley kindly offered to print them at his own
+ expense; only as many were printed as would be sufficient for three
+ or four clerical societies. Had I known how valuable those little
+ pamphlets were destined to become, I should have had many more
+ printed!--ED.
+
+They are entirely at your command and theirs--but don't sell the
+copyright to any publisher. Keep it in your own hands, and after
+expenses are paid of course any profits should go to the poor. Please
+write during this week to me at St. George's Museum, Walkley,
+Sheffield.
+
+
+
+
+ 22.
+
+
+ _From_ CANON FARRAR.
+
+ _October 29th, 1879._
+
+I am much obliged to you for your courtesy in sending me the letters. I
+am not, however, inclined to enter into any controversy, being painfully
+overwhelmed with the very duties which Mr. Ruskin seems to think that we
+don't do--looking after the material and religious interests of the
+sick, the suffering, the hungry, the drunken, and the extremely
+wretched.
+
+ Yours very truly,
+ F. W. FARRAR.
+
+
+
+
+ 23.
+
+
+ SHEFFIELD, _October 17th, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I am sincerely interested and moved by your history
+of your laborious life--and shall be entirely glad to leave the
+completed volume as your property, provided always you sell it to no
+publisher--but take just percentage on the editions: and provided also
+that an edition be issued of the letters themselves in their present
+simple form of which the profits, if any, shall be for the poor of the
+district.[30] It would lower your position in the whole matter if it
+could be hinted that I had written the letters with any semi-purpose of
+serving my friend. On the other hand you will have just and honourable
+right to the profits of the completed edition which your labour and
+judgment will have made possible and guided into the most serviceable
+form.
+
+ [30] This, of course, with Mr. Allen's concurrence, is my
+ intention.--ED.
+
+I am thankful to see that the letters read clearly and easily, and
+contain all that it was in my mind to get said; that nothing can be
+possibly more right in every way than the printing and binding--nor more
+courteous and firm than your preface.
+
+Yes--there _will_ be a chasm to cross--a tauriformis
+Aufidus[31]--greater than Rubicon, and the roar of it for many a year
+has been heard in the distance, through the gathering fog on earth more
+loudly.
+
+ [31] Sic tauriformis volvitur Aufidus,
+ Qui regna Dauni præfluit Appuli
+ Quum sævit, horrendamque cultis
+ Diluviem meditatur agris.
+
+ --HOR. _Carm._ iv. 14.
+
+The River of Spiritual Death in this world--and entrance to Purgatory in
+the other, come down to us.
+
+When will the feet of the Priests be dipped in the still brim of the
+water? Jordan overflows his banks already.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+When you have got your large edition with its correspondence into form,
+I should like to read the sheets as they are issued, and put merely
+letters of reference, _a_, _b_, and _c_, to be taken up in a short
+epilogue. But I don't want to do or say anything till you have all in
+perfect readiness for publication. I should merely add my reference
+letters in the margin, and the shortest possible notes at the end.
+
+Please send me ten more of these private ones for my own friends.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 24.
+
+ _Extract of a Letter from the late_
+
+ MISS SUSANNA BEEVER.
+
+ ("The Younger Lady of the Thwaite, Coniston," to whom Mr. Ruskin
+ dedicated "Frondes Agrestes.")
+
+
+ _October 28th, 1879._
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--My sister has asked me to write and thank you for
+two copies of Mr. Ruskin's Letters, which you have been so good as to
+send to her. It is curious that before the post came this morning I had
+been wondering whether I might ask you for a copy. * * * I have already
+read these deeply interesting Letters five times. They are like the
+"foam globes of leaven," I might say they have exercised my mind very
+much. Things in them which at first seemed rather startling, prove on
+closer examination to be full of deep truth. The suggestions in them
+lead to "great searchings of heart." There is much with which I entirely
+agree; much over which to ponder. What an insight into human nature is
+shown in the remark that though we are so ready to call ourselves
+"miserable sinners," we resent being accused of any special fault. * * *
+
+
+
+
+ 25.
+
+
+ _November 7th, 1879._
+
+I am so glad we understand each other now and that you will carry out
+your plan quietly.
+
+I think you should correct the present little book by my revise, and
+print enough for whatever private circulation the members of the meeting
+wish, but that it should not be made public till well after the large
+book is out. For which I shall look with deepest interest.
+
+
+
+
+ 26.
+
+
+ _November 19th, 1879._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I have not been able to answer a word lately, being
+quite unusually busy in France--and you never remember that it takes
+_me_ as long to write a chapter as you to write a book, and tries me
+more to do it--so that I am sick of the feel of a pen this many a day.
+I'm delighted to hear of your popularity,[32] being sure that all you
+advise people to do will be kind and right. I am not surprised at the
+popularity, but I wonder that you have not had some nasty envious
+reviews.[33]
+
+ [32] Meaning in the press notices of the Editor's "Life of
+ Christ."--ED.
+
+ [33] Seventeen _very good_, five _good_, five _fair_, six _bad_,
+ two _nasty, envious_!--ED.
+
+I like the impudence of these Scotch brats.[34] Do they suppose it would
+have been either pleasure or honour to me to come and lecture there? It
+is perhaps as much their luck as mine that they changed their minds
+about it. I shall be down at Brantwood soon (_D.V._). Poor Mr. Sly's[35]
+death is a much more troublous thing to me than Glasgow Elections.
+
+ [34] Glasgow University.
+
+ [35] Of the Waterhead, Coniston.
+
+
+
+
+ 27.
+
+
+ _January 5th, 1880._
+
+A Happy New Year to you. If I may judge or guess by the efforts made to
+draw me into the business, it is likely to be a busy one for you! Will
+you kindly now send me back my old book on Usury? I've got a letter
+(which for his lordship's sake had better never been written) from the
+Bishop of Manchester, and may want to quote a word or two of my back
+letter. I send the letter with my reply this month to the
+_Contemporary_.
+
+
+
+
+ 28.
+
+
+ _January 7th, 1880._
+
+So many thanks for your kind little note and the book which I have
+received quite safely; and many more thanks for taking all the enemies'
+fire off me and leaving me quiet. I've been all this morning at work on
+finches and buntings; but I must give the Bishop a turn to-morrow. This
+weather takes my little wits out of me wofully; but I am always
+affectionately yours,
+
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 29.
+
+
+ _May 10th, 1880._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--Yes, the omission of the 'Mr.' meant much change in
+all my feelings towards you and estimates of you--for which change,
+believe me, I am more glad and thankful than I can well tell you. Not
+but that of course I always felt your essential goodness and rightness
+of mind, but I did not at all understand the scope of them.
+
+And you will have the reward of the Visitation of the Sick, though every
+day I am more sure of the mistake made by good people universally--in
+trying to pull fallen people up--instead of keeping yet safe ones from
+tumbling after them, and always spending their pains on the worst
+instead of the best material. If they want to be able to save the lost
+like Christ, let them first be sure they can say with Him, "Of those
+Thou gavest Me I have lost none."
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+The 'Epilogue's' an awful bother to me in this May time! I have not done
+a word yet, but you shall have it before the week is out.
+
+
+
+
+ 30.
+
+
+ _April 17._
+
+The letters seem all very nice--I shall have very little to
+say about them, except to explain what you observe and have been
+misunderstood.... Of course my notes shall be sent to you and added to
+when you see need. But I cannot do it quickly.
+
+
+
+
+ 31.
+
+
+ _April 14, 1880._
+
+Thanks for nice new proofs. I haven't found any false references, but I
+didn't look. I'll have all verified by my secretary. I'm busy with an
+article on modern novels and don't feel a bit pious just now; so the
+responses have hung fire.
+
+
+
+
+ 32.
+
+
+ _May 9._
+
+You are really very good about this, and shall have the notes (_D.V._)
+within a fortnight. The Scott could not be put off, being promised for
+June 19, _Nineteenth Century_, and I could not do novels and sermons
+together. I don't think the notes will be long. The letters seem to be
+mostly compliments or small objections not worth noticing.
+
+
+
+
+ 33.
+
+
+ _May 14th, 1880._
+
+I've just done--yesterday with Scott, and took up the letters for the
+first time this morning seriously.
+
+I had never seen _yours_ at all when I wrote last. I fell first on Mr.
+----, whom I read with some attention, and commented on with little
+favour; went on to the next, and remained content with that taste till I
+had done my Scott.
+
+I have this morning been reading your own, on which I very earnestly
+congratulate you. God knows it isn't because they are friendly or
+complimentary, but because you _do_ see what I mean, and people hardly
+ever do--and I think it needs very considerable power and feeling to
+forgive and understand as you do. You have said everything _I_ want to
+say, and much more--except on the one point of excommunication, which
+will be the chief, almost the only subject of my final note.
+
+I write in haste to excuse myself for my former note.
+
+ Ever affectionately
+ and gratefully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+(NOTE.--A legal friend remarks that in his opinion I should refrain from
+printing _extracts_ from letters, and always print the whole; or,
+indeed, in the present case, the whole series of letters, lest it should
+be suspected that I am making a self-indulgent selection only of the
+good words which Mr. Ruskin is kind enough to use in his communications
+with me. Let me here say, however, that had there been in all these
+letters any which conveyed censure, stricture, or blame of any kind, I
+should not have withheld my hand from including them. But no such
+letters ever came to me. Mr. Ruskin is the very pink of courtesy with
+his friends, and he _may_ have suppressed remarks which he thought might
+wound me. But I am reproducing here not my friend's secret thoughts, but
+only those of his letters which remain in my possession.--EDITOR.)
+
+
+
+
+ 34.
+
+
+ _May 26th, 1880._
+
+I'm at work on the 'Epilogue,' but it takes more trouble than I
+expected. I see there's a letter from you which I leave unopened, for
+fear there should be anything in it to put me in a bad temper, which you
+might easily do without meaning it. You shall have the 'Epilogue' as
+soon as I can get it done; but you won't much like it, for there are
+bits in the Clergymen's letters that have put my bristles up. They ought
+either to have said nothing about me, or known more.
+
+I should give that rascally Bishop a dressing "au sérieux," only you
+wouldn't like to godfather it, so I'll keep it for somewhere else.[36]
+
+ [36] Needless to say that in this energetic language, the Master of
+ the Company of St. George is referring to nothing whatever in the
+ stainless character of the great Bishop, of whom it is justly
+ recorded in the inscription on his monument in Manchester Cathedral
+ that "he won all hearts by opening to them his own;" except only in
+ the matter of house-rent and interest of money, opinions which the
+ Bishop shared with the great mass of civilized humanity.
+
+
+
+
+
+ 35.
+
+
+ _June 7th, 1880._
+
+Your letter is a relief to my mind, and shall not be taken advantage of
+for more delay. The wet day or two would get all done: but I simply
+can't think of anything but the sun while it shines.
+
+And I've had second, third, and seventh thoughts about several things:
+as it is coming out I believe it will be a useful contribution to the
+book.
+
+I shall get it in the copyist's hand on Monday, and as it's one of my
+girl secretaries, I shall be teased till it's done, so it's safe for the
+end of the week (_D.V._). I am sadly afraid she'll make me cut out some
+of the spiciest bits: the girl secretaries are always allowed to put
+their pens through anything they choose. Please drop the 'Mr.'; it is a
+matter of friendship, not as if there were any of different powers. God
+only knows of higher and lower, and, as far as I can judge, is likely to
+put ministry to the sick much above public letters.
+
+Thanks for note of Menyanthes Trifoliata.
+
+I haven't seen it, scarcely moving at present beyond my wood or garden.
+
+
+
+
+ 36.
+
+
+ _June 13th, 1880._
+
+You are really very good to put up with all that vicious Epilogue. But
+it won't discredit _you_ in the end, whatever it may do me. I hope much
+otherwise.
+
+I will send you to-morrow the Lincoln, or, possibly, York MS. to look
+at. You will find the Litany following the Quicunque vult, and on the
+leaf marked by me 83, at the top the passage I began quotation with. It
+will need a note; for _domptnum_ is, I believe, strong Yorkshire Latin
+for Donum Apostolicum, not Dominum.
+
+The _e_ in Ecclesie for _æ_ is the proper form in medieval Latin.
+
+The calendar and Litany are invaluable in their splendid lists of
+English saints, and the entire book unreplaceable, so mind you lock it
+up carefully!
+
+
+
+
+ 37.
+
+
+There's a good deal of interest in the enclosed layman's letter, I
+think. Would you like to print any bits of it? I cannot quite make up my
+mind if it's worth or not.
+
+
+
+
+ 38.
+
+
+ _June 27th, 1880._
+
+The 'Epilogue' is all but done to-day, and shall be sent by railway
+guard to-morrow (_D.V._), with a book which will further interest you
+and your good secretary. It is as fine an example of the coloured print
+Prayer-Book as I have seen, date 1507, and full of examples of the way
+Romanism had ruined itself at that date. But it may contain in legible
+form some things of interest. I never could make out so much as its
+Calendar; but the songs about the saints and rhymed hours are very
+pretty. Though the illuminations are all ridiculous and one or two
+frightful, most are more or less pretty, and nearly all interesting. You
+can keep it any time, but you must promise me not to show it to anybody
+who does not know how to handle a book. * * *
+
+(NOTE.--I may mention here, once for all, that wherever there are
+omissions left in Mr. Ruskin's letters, there is nothing of interest or
+importance in those passages for any one but for the receiver of that
+letter.)
+
+
+
+
+ 39.
+
+
+ _July 15th, 1880._
+
+* * * It is a further light to me, on your curious differences from most
+clergymen, very wonderful and venerable to me, that you should
+understand Byron!
+
+
+
+
+ 40.
+
+
+ _June 25th._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--No, I don't want the letter printed in the least; but
+it ought to have interested you very differently. It is by a much older
+man than I, who has never heard of our letters, but has been a very
+useful and influential person in his own parish, and is a practical and
+acceptable contributor to sporting papers. He is an able lawyer also,
+and knows far better than I do and far better than most clergymen know,
+what could really be done in their country parishes if they had a mind.
+
+The bit of manuscript is perfectly fac-similed by your niece, but I
+can't read it: and it will be much better that you mark the places you
+wish certification about, and that I then send the book up to the
+British Museum, and have the whole made clear. The _dompt_ is a very
+important matter indeed.
+
+I have got the last bit of epilogue fairly on foot this morning, and
+can promise it on Monday all well.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 41.
+
+
+ _April 30th, 1881._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--It will be many a day before I recover yet--if ever--but
+with caution I hope not to go wild again, and to get what power belongs
+to my age slowly back. When were you in the same sort of danger? Let me
+very strongly warn you from the whirlpool edge--the going down in the
+middle is gloomier than I can tell you.
+
+But I shall thankfully see you and your friend here. Visiting is out of
+the question for me. I can bear no fatigue nor excitement away from my
+home. I pay visits no more--anywhere (even in old times few). It is
+always a great gladness to me when young students care about old
+books--and I remember as a duty the feeling I used to have in getting a
+Missal, even after I was past a good many other pleasures. You made such
+good use of that book too, that I am happy in yielding to any wish of
+yours about it, so your young friend[37] shall have it if he likes. The
+marked price is quite a fair market one for it, though you might look
+and wait long before such a book came _into_ the market. The British
+Museum people were hastily and superciliously wrong in calling it a
+common book. It is not a _showy_ one; but there are few more interesting
+or more perfect service books in English manuscript, and the Museum
+people buy cart-loads of big folios that are not worth the shelf room.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ [37] Rev. J. R. Haslam, now Vicar of Thwaites, Cumberland. See
+ Appendix.--ED.
+
+
+
+
+ 42.
+
+
+ _April 23rd, 1881._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--These passages of description and illustration of the
+general aspect of Ephesus in St. Paul's time seem to me much more
+forcibly and artistically written than anything you did in the "Life of
+Christ"; and I could not suggest any changes to you which you could now
+carry out under the conditions of time to revise, except a more clear
+statement of the Ephesian goddess.
+
+[I really do not think Mr. Ruskin would wish that _all_ he wrote in the
+next sentence about the Ephesian Diana should be placed before the
+public eye. But I resume in the middle of a sentence.]
+
+... practically at last and chiefly of the Diabolic Suction of the
+Usurer; and her temple, which you luckily liken to the Bank of England,
+was in fact what that establishment would be as the recognised place of
+pious pilgrimage for all Jews, infidels, or prostitutes in the realm of
+England. You could not conceive the real facts of these degraded
+worships of the mixed Greek and Asiatic races, unless you gave a good
+year's work to the study of the decline of Greek art in the 3rd and 4th
+centuries B.C.
+
+Charles Newton's pride in discovering Mausolus, and engineers' whistling
+over his Asiatic mummy, have entirely corrupted and thwarted the uses
+of the British Museum Art Galleries. The Drum of that Diana Temple is
+barbarous rubbish, not worth tenpence a ton; and if I shewed you a
+photograph of the head of Mausolus without telling you what it was, I
+will undertake that you saw with candid eyes in it nothing more than the
+shaggy poll of a common gladiator. But your book will swim with the
+tide. It is best so.
+
+
+
+
+ 43.
+
+
+ _July...._
+
+I'm not in the least anxious about my MS., and shall only be glad if you
+like to keep it long enough to read thoroughly. There must surely be
+published copies of such extant, though, and worth enquiring after?
+
+Partly the fine weather, partly the heat, partly a fit of Scott and
+Byron have stopped the Epilogue utterly for the time! You cannot be in
+any hurry for it surely? There's plenty to go on printing with.
+
+I don't think you will find the n's and m's much bother; the
+contractions are the great nuisance. But I do think this development of
+Gothic writing one of the oddest absurdities of mankind.
+
+The illumination of "the fool hath said in his heart," snapping his
+fingers, or more accurately making the indecent sign called "the fig" by
+the Italians, is a very unusual one in this MS., and peculiarly English.
+
+
+
+
+ 44.
+
+
+There is not the least use in my looking over these sheets: you
+probably know more about Athens than I do, and what I do know is out of
+and in Smith's Dictionary, where you can find it without trouble.
+
+For the rest you must please always remember what I told you once for
+all, that you could never interest _me_ by writing about people, either
+at Athens or Ephesus, but only of those of the parish of
+Broughton-in-Furness.
+
+That new translation could not come out well; that much I know without
+looking at it. One must believe the Bible before one understands it, (I
+mean, believe that it is understandable) and one must understand before
+one can translate it. Two stages in advance of your Twenty-Four
+Co-operative Tyndales!
+
+
+
+
+ 45.
+
+
+ _26th May._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--I should be delighted to see Canon Weston and you any
+day: but I want J---- to be at home, and she is going to town next week
+for a month, and will be fussy till she goes. She promises to be back
+faithfully within the week after that--within the Sunday, I mean. Fix
+any day or any choice of days if one is wet after the said Sunday, and
+we shall both be in comfort ready.
+
+If Canon Weston or you are going away anywhere, come any day before that
+suits you.
+
+In divinity matters I am obliged to stop--for my sins, I suppose. But it
+seems I am almost struck mad when I think earnestly about them, and I'm
+only reading now natural history or nature.
+
+Never mind Autograph people, they are never worth the scratch of a pen.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 46.
+
+
+ _August 26th, 1881._
+
+I'm in furious bad humour with the weather, and cannot receive just now
+at all, having had infinitely too much of indoors, and yet unable to
+draw for darkness, or write for temper. But I will see Mr. ---- if he
+has any other reason than curiosity for wishing to see me--what does he
+want with me?
+
+
+
+
+ 47.
+
+
+ _21st October._
+
+I am fairly well, but have twenty times the work in hand that I am able
+for; and read--Virgil, Plato, and Hesoid, when I have time! But
+assuredly no modern books; least of all my friends', lest I should have
+either to flatter or offend. Still less will I have to say to young men
+proposing to become clergymen. I have distinctly told them their
+business is at present--to dig, not preach.
+
+Let your young friend read his Fors. All that he needs of me is in that.
+
+
+
+
+ 48.
+
+
+ ANNECY, SAVOY,
+ _November 15th, 1882._
+
+I have got your kind little note of the 11th yesterday, and am entirely
+glad to hear of your papers on the Duddon. I shall be very happy indeed
+if you find any pleasure in remembering our walk to the tarn.[38] I hope
+I know now better how to manage myself in all ways, and we may still
+have some pleasant talks, my health not failing me.
+
+ [38] Goat's Water, under the Old Man of Coniston.
+
+
+
+
+ 49.
+
+
+ TALLOIRE, SWITZERLAND,
+ _November 20th, 1882._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I am sincerely grieved that you begin to feel the
+effect of overwork; but as this is the first warning you have had, and
+as you are wise enough to obey it, I trust that the three months' rest
+will restore you all your usual powers on the conditions of using them
+with discretion, and not rising to write at two in the morning.
+
+I am very thankful to find in my own case that a quiet spring of energy
+filters back into the old well-heads--if one does not bucket it out as
+fast as it comes in.
+
+But my last illnesses seriously impaired my walking powers, and I'm
+afraid if you came to Switzerland I should be very jealous of you.
+
+Certainly it is not in this season a country for an invalid, and I
+believe you cannot be safer than by English firesides with no books to
+work at nor parishioners to visit.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 50.
+
+
+ _January 22nd, 1883._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--I am heartily glad to hear that you are better, and that
+you are going to lead the Vicar of Wakefield's quiet life. I am not
+stronger myself, but think it right to keep hold of the Oxford Helm, as
+long as they care to trust it to me.
+
+I've entirely given up reviewing, but if the Editor of the
+_Contemporary_ would send me Mr. Peek's Article, when set up, I might
+perhaps send a note or two on it, which the real reviewer might use or
+not at his pleasure. In the meantime it would greatly oblige me if the
+Editor could give me the reference to an old article of mine on Herbert
+Spencer, (or at least on a saying of his), which I cannot find where I
+thought it was in the _Nineteenth Century_, and suppose therefore to
+have been in the _Contemporary_ before the _Nineteenth Century_ Athena
+arose out of its cleft head.
+
+The Article had a lot about Coniston in it, but I quite forget what else
+it was about. I think it must have been just before the separation.
+Kindest regards and congratulations on your convalescence from all here.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 51.
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _February 6th, 1883_.
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I'm nearly beside myself with a sudden rush of work
+on my return from abroad, and resumption of Oxford duties, and I simply
+_cannot_ yet think over the business of the letters, the rather that _I_
+certainly never would re-publish most of those clergymen's letters at
+all.
+
+My own were a gift to you, and I am quite ready to print _them_ if you
+like, and let you have half profits, the St. George's Guild having the
+other. But that could not be for some time yet.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON, _June 1880_.
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I have glanced at the proofs you send; and _can_ do
+no more than glance, even if it seemed to me desirable that I should do
+more,--which, after said glance, it does in no wise. Let me remind you
+of what it is absolutely necessary that the readers of the book should
+clearly understand--that I wrote these Letters at your request, to be
+read and discussed at the meeting of a private society of clergymen. I
+declined then to be present at the discussion, and I decline still. You
+afterwards asked leave to print the Letters, to which I replied that
+they were yours, for whatever use you saw good to make of them:
+afterwards your plans expanded, while my own notion remained precisely
+what it had been--that the discussion should have been private, and kept
+within the limits of the society, and that its conclusions, if any,
+should have been announced in a few pages of clear print, for the
+parishioners' exclusive reading.
+
+I am, of course, flattered by the wider course you have obtained for the
+Letters, but am not in the slightest degree interested by the debate
+upon them, nor by any religious debates whatever, undertaken without
+serious conviction that there is a jot wrong in matters as they are, or
+serious resolution to make them a tittle better. Which, so far as I can
+read the minds of your correspondents, appears to me the substantial
+state of them.
+
+One thing I cannot pass without protest--the quantity of talk about the
+writer of the Letters. What I am, or am not, is of no moment whatever to
+the matters in hand. I observe with comfort, or at least with
+complacency, that on the strength of a couple of hours' talk, at a time
+when I was thinking chiefly of the weatherings of slate you were good
+enough to show me above Goat's Water, you would have ventured to baptize
+me in the little lake--as not a goat, but a sheep. The best I can be
+sure of, myself, is that I am no wolf, and have never aspired to the
+dignity even of a Dog of the Lord.
+
+You told me, if I remember rightly, that one of the members of the
+original meeting denounced me as an arch-heretic[39]--meaning,
+doubtless, an arch-pagan; for a heretic, or sect-maker, is of all terms
+of reproach the last that can be used of me. And I think he should have
+been answered that it was precisely as an arch-pagan that I ventured to
+request a more intelligible and more unanimous account of the Christian
+Gospel from its preachers.
+
+ [39] Only a heretic!--ED.
+
+If anything in the Letters offended those of you who hold me a brother,
+surely it had been best to tell me between ourselves, or to tell it to
+the Church, or to let me be Anathema Maranatha in peace,--in any case, I
+must at present so abide, correcting only the mistakes about myself
+which have led to graver ones about the things I wanted to speak of.[40]
+
+ [40] I may perhaps be pardoned for vindicating at least my
+ arithmetic, which, with Bishop Colenso, I rather pride myself upon.
+ One of your correspondents greatly doubts my having heard five
+ thousand assertors of evangelical principles (Catholic-absolvent or
+ Protestant-detergent are virtually the same). I am now sixty years
+ old, and for forty-five of them was in church at least once on the
+ Sunday,--say once a month also in afternoons,--and you have above
+ three thousand church services. When I am abroad I am often in
+ half-a-dozen churches in the course of a single day, and never lose
+ a chance of listening to anything that is going on. Add the
+ conversations pursued, not unearnestly, with every sort of reverend
+ person I can get to talk to me--from the Bishop of Strasburg (as
+ good a specimen of a town bishop as I have known), with whom I was
+ studying ecstatic paintings in the year 1850--down to the simplest
+ travelling tinker inclined Gospelwards, whom I perceive to be
+ sincere, and your correspondent will perceive that my rapid
+ numerical expression must be far beneath the truth. He subjoins his
+ more rational doubt of my acquaintance with many town missionaries;
+ to which I can only answer, that as I do not live in town, nor set
+ up for a missionary myself, my spiritual advantages have certainly
+ not been great in that direction. I simply assert that of the few I
+ have known,--beginning with Mr. Spurgeon, under whom I sat with
+ much edification for a year or two,--I have not known any such
+ teaching as I speak of.
+
+The most singular one, perhaps, in all the Letters is that of Mr. ----,
+that I do not attach enough weight to antiquity. My reply to it is
+partly written already, with reference to the wishes of some other of
+your correspondents to know more of my reasons for finding fault with
+the English Liturgy.
+
+If people are taught to use the Liturgy rightly and reverently, it will
+bring them all good; and for some thirty years of my life I used to read
+it always through to my servant and myself, if we had no Protestant
+church to go to, in Alpine or Italian villages. One can always tacitly
+pray of it what one wants, and let the rest pass. But, as I have grown
+older, and watched the decline in the Christian faith of all nations, I
+have got more and more suspicious of the effect of this particular form
+of words on the truthfulness of the English mind (now fast becoming a
+salt which has lost his savour, and is fit only to be trodden under
+foot of men). And during the last ten years, in which my position at
+Oxford has compelled me to examine what authority there was for the code
+of prayer, of which the University is now so ashamed that it no more
+dares compel its youths so much as to hear, much less to utter it, I got
+necessarily into the habit of always looking to the original forms of
+the prayers of the fully developed Christian Church. Nor did I think it
+a mere chance which placed in my own possession a manuscript of the
+perfect Church service of the thirteenth century,[41] written by the
+monks of the Sainte Chapelle for St. Louis; together with one of the
+same date, written in England, probably for the Diocese of Lincoln;
+adding some of the Collects, in which it corresponds with St. Louis's,
+and the Latin hymns so much beloved by Dante, with the appointed music
+for them.
+
+ [41] See Appendix.
+
+And my wonder has been greater every hour, since I examined closely the
+text of these and other early books, that in any state of declining, or
+captive, energy, the Church of England should have contented itself with
+a service which cast out, from beginning to end, all these intensely
+spiritual and passionate utterances of chanted prayer (the whole body,
+that is to say, of the authentic _Christian_ Psalms), and in adopting
+what it timidly preserved of the Collects, mangled or blunted them down
+to the exact degree which would make them either unintelligible or
+inoffensive--so vague that everybody might use them, or so pointless
+that nobody could be offended by them. For a special instance: The
+prayer for "our bishops and curates, and all congregations committed to
+their charge," is, in the Lincoln Service-book, "for our bishop, and all
+congregations committed to _his_ charge." The change from singular to
+plural seems a slight one. But it suffices to take the eyes of the
+people off their own bishop into infinite space; to change a prayer
+which was intended to be uttered in personal anxiety and affection, into
+one for the general good of the Church, of which nobody could judge, and
+for which nobody would particularly care; and, finally, to change a
+prayer to which the answer, if given, would be visible, into one of
+which nobody could tell whether it were answered or not.
+
+In the Collects, the change, though verbally slight, is thus tremendous
+in issue. But in the Litany--word and thought go all wild together. The
+first prayer of the Litany in the Lincoln Service-book is for the Pope
+and all ranks beneath him, implying a very noteworthy piece of
+theology--that the Pope might err in religious matters, and that the
+prayer of the humblest servant of God would be useful to him:--"Ut
+Dompnum Apostolicum, et omnes gradus ecclesie in sancta religione
+conservare digneris." Meaning that whatever errors particular persons
+might, and must, fall into, they prayed God to keep the Pope right, and
+the collective testimony and conduct of the ranks below him. Then
+follows the prayer for their own bishop and _his_ flock--then for the
+king and the princes (chief lords), that they (not all nations) might be
+kept in concord--and then for _our_ bishops and abbots,--the Church of
+England proper; every one of these petitions being direct, limited, and
+personally heartfelt;--and then this lovely one for themselves:--
+
+"Ut obsequium servitutis nostre rationabile facias."--"That thou wouldst
+make the obedience of our service reasonable" ("which is your reasonable
+service").[42]
+
+ [42] See in the Appendix for more of these beautiful prayers.--ED.
+
+This glorious prayer is, I believe, accurately an "early English" one.
+It is not in the St. Louis Litany, nor in a later elaborate French
+fourteenth century one; but I find it softened in an Italian MS. of the
+fifteenth century into "ut nosmet ipsos in tuo sancto servitio
+confortare et conservare digneris,"--"that thou wouldst deign to keep
+and comfort us ourselves in thy sacred service" (the comfort, observe,
+being here asked for whether reasonable or not!); and in the best and
+fullest French service-book I have, printed at Rouen in 1520, it
+becomes, "ut congregationes omnium sanctorum in tuo sancto servitio
+conservare digneris;" while victory as well as concord is asked for the
+king and the princes,--thus leading the way to that for our own Queen's
+victory over all her enemies, a prayer which might now be advisedly
+altered into one that she--and in her, the monarchy of England--might
+find more fidelity in their friends.
+
+I give one more example of the corruption of our Prayer-Book, with
+reference to the objections taken by some of your correspondents to the
+distinction implied in my Letters between the Persons of the Father and
+the Christ.
+
+The "Memoria de Sancta Trinitate," in the St. Louis service-book, runs
+thus:
+
+"Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, qui dedisti famulis tuis in confessione
+vere fidei eterne Trinitatis gloriam agnoscere, et in potentia
+majestatis adorare unitatem, quesumus ut ejus fidei firmitate ab omnibus
+semper muniemur adversis. Qui vivis et regnas Deus, per omnia secula
+seculorum. Amen."
+
+"Almighty and everlasting God, who hast given to Thy servants, in
+confession of true faith to recognize the glory of the Eternal Trinity,
+and in the power of Majesty to pray to the Unity; we ask that by the
+firmness of that faith we may be always defended from all adverse
+things, who livest and reignest God through all ages. Amen."
+
+Turning to our Collect, we find we have first slipped in the word "us"
+before "Thy servants," and by that little insertion have slipped in the
+squire and his jockey, and the public-house landlord--and any one else
+who may chance to have been coaxed, swept, or threatened into church on
+Trinity Sunday, and required the entire company of them to profess
+themselves servants of God, and believers in the mystery of the Trinity.
+And we think we have done God a service!
+
+"Grace." Not a word about grace in the original. You don't believe by
+having grace, but by having wit.
+
+"To acknowledge." "Agnosco" is to recognize, not to acknowledge. To
+_see_ that there are three lights in a chandelier is a great deal more
+than to acknowledge that they are there.
+
+"To worship." "Adorare" is to pray to, not to worship. You may worship a
+mere magistrate; but you _pray_ to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
+
+The last sentence in the English is too horribly mutilated to be dealt
+with in any patience. The meaning of the great old collect is that by
+the shield of that faith we may quench all the fiery darts of the devil.
+The English prayer means, if it means anything, "Please keep us in our
+faith without our taking any trouble; and, besides, please don't let us
+lose our money, nor catch cold."
+
+"Who livest and reignest." Right; but how many of any extant or instant
+congregations understand what the two words mean? That God is a living
+God, not a dead Law; and that He is a reigning God, putting wrong things
+to rights, and that, sooner or later, with a strong hand and a rod of
+iron; and not at all with a soft sponge and warm water, washing
+everybody as clean as a baby every Sunday morning, whatever dirty work
+they may have been about all the week.
+
+On which latter supposition your modern Liturgy, in so far as it has
+supplemented instead of corrected the old one, has entirely modelled
+itself,--producing in its first address to the congregation before the
+Almighty precisely the faultfullest and foolishest piece of English
+language that I know in the whole compass of English or American
+literature. In the seventeen lines of it (as printed in my
+old-fashioned, large-print prayer-book), there are seven times over two
+words for one idea.
+
+ 1. Acknowledge and confess.
+ 2. Sins and wickedness.
+ 3. Dissemble nor cloke.
+ 4. Goodness and mercy.
+ 5. Assemble and meet.
+ 6. Requisite and necessary.
+ 7. Pray and beseech.
+
+There is, indeed, a shade of difference in some of these ideas for a
+good scholar, none for a general congregation;[43] and what difference
+they can guess at merely muddles their heads: to acknowledge sin is
+indeed different from confessing it, but it cannot be done at a minute's
+notice; and goodness is a different thing from mercy, but it is by no
+means God's infinite goodness that forgives our badness, but that judges
+it.
+
+ [43] The only explanation ever offered for this exuberant wordiness
+ is that if worshippers did not understand one term they would the
+ other, and in some cases, in the Exhortation and elsewhere, one
+ word is of Latin and the other of Saxon derivation.[44] But this is
+ surely a very feeble excuse for bad composition. Of a very
+ different kind is that beautiful climax which is reached in the
+ three admirably chosen pairs of words in the Prayer for the
+ Parliament, "peace and happiness, truth and justice, religion and
+ piety."--EDITOR.
+
+ [44] The repetition of synonymous terms is of very frequent
+ occurrence in sixteenth century writing, as "for ever and aye,"
+ "Time and the hour ran through the roughest day" (Macbeth, i. 3).
+
+"The faultfullest," I said, "and the foolishest." After using fourteen
+words where seven would have done, what is it that the whole speech
+gets said with its much speaking? This Morning Service of all England
+begins with the assertion that the Scripture moveth us in sundry places
+to confess our sins before God. _Does_ it so? Have your congregations
+ever been referred to those sundry places? Or do they take the assertion
+on trust, or remain under the impression that, unless with the advantage
+of their own candour, God must remain ill-informed on the subject of
+their sins?
+
+"That we should not dissemble nor cloke them." _Can_ we then? Are these
+grown-up congregations of the enlightened English Church in the
+nineteenth century still so young in their nurseries that the "Thou,
+God, seest me" is still not believed by them if they get under the bed?
+
+Let us look up the sundry moving passages referred to.
+
+(I suppose myself a simple lamb of the flock, and only able to use my
+English Bible.)
+
+I find in my concordance (confess and confession together) forty-two
+occurrences of the word. Sixteen of these, including John's confession
+that he was not the Christ, and the confession of the faithful fathers
+that they were pilgrims on the earth, do indeed move us strongly to
+confess Christ before men. Have you ever taught your congregations what
+that confession means? They are ready enough to confess Him in church,
+that is to say, in their own private synagogue. Will they in Parliament?
+Will they in a ball-room? Will they in a shop? Sixteen of the texts are
+to enforce their doing _that_.
+
+The next most important one (1 Tim. vi. 13) refers to Christ's own good
+confession, which I suppose was not of His sins, but of His obedience.
+How many of your congregations can make any such kind of confession, or
+wish to make it?
+
+The eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth (1 Kings viii. 33, 2 Chron.
+vi. 26, Heb. xiii. 15) speak of confessing thankfully that God is God
+(and not a putrid plasma nor a theory of development), and the
+twenty-first (Job xl. 14) speaks of God's own confession, that no doubt
+we are the people, and that wisdom shall die with us, and on what
+conditions He will make it.
+
+There remain twenty-one texts which do speak of the confession of our
+sins--very moving ones indeed--and Heaven grant that some day the
+British public may be moved by them.
+
+1. The first is Lev. v. 5, "He shall confess that he hath sinned _in
+that thing_." And if you can get any soul of your congregation to say he
+has sinned in _any_thing, he may do it in two words for one if he likes,
+and it will yet be good liturgy.
+
+2. The second is indeed general--Lev. xvi. 21: the command that the
+whole nation should afflict its soul on the great day of atonement once
+a year. The Church of England, I believe, enjoins no such unpleasant
+ceremony. Her festivals are passed by her people often indeed in the
+extinction of their souls, but by no means in their intentional
+affliction.
+
+3. The third, fourth, and fifth (Lev. xxvi. 40, Numb. v. 7, Nehem. i. 6)
+refer all to national humiliation for definite idolatry, accompanied
+with an entire abandonment of that idolatry, and of idolatrous persons.
+How soon _that_ form of confession is likely to find a place in the
+English congregations the defences of their main idol, mammon, in the
+vilest and cruellest shape of it--usury--with which this book has been
+defiled, show very sufficiently.
+
+6. The sixth is Psalm xxxii. 5--virtually the whole of that psalm, which
+does, indeed, entirely refer to the greater confession, once for all
+opening the heart to God, which can be by no means done fifty-two times
+a year, and which, once done, puts men into a state in which they will
+never again say there is no health in them; nor that their hearts are
+desperately wicked; but will obey for ever the instantly following
+order, "Rejoice in the Lord, ye righteous, and shout for joy, all ye
+that are true of heart."
+
+7. The seventh is the one confession in which I can myself
+share:--"After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the Lord
+God of my fathers."
+
+8. The eighth, James v. 16, tells us to confess our faults--not to God,
+but "one to another"--a practice not favoured by English
+catechumens--(by the way, what _do_ you all mean by "auricular"
+confession--confession that can be heard? and is the Protestant
+pleasanter form one that can't be?)
+
+9. The ninth is that passage of St. John (i. 9), the favourite
+evangelical text, which is read and preached by thousands of false
+preachers every day, without once going on to read its great companion,
+"Beloved, if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and
+knoweth all things; but if our heart condemn us _not_, then have we
+confidence toward God." Make your people understand the second text, and
+they will understand the first. At present you leave them understanding
+neither.
+
+And the entire body of the remaining texts is summed in Joshua vii. 19
+and Ezra x. 11, in which, whether it be Achan, with his Babylonish
+garment, or the people of Israel, with their Babylonish lusts, the
+meaning of confession is simply what it is to every brave boy, girl,
+man, and woman, who knows the meaning of the word "honour" before God or
+man--namely, to say what they have done wrong, and to take the
+punishment of it (not to get it blanched over by any means), and to do
+it no more--which is so far from being a tone of mind generally enforced
+either by the English, or any other extant Liturgy, that, though all my
+maids are exceedingly pious, and insist on the privilege of going to
+church as a quite inviolable one, I think it a scarcely to be hoped for
+crown and consummation of virtue in them that they should tell me when
+they have broken a plate; and I should expect to be met only with looks
+of indignation and astonishment if I ventured to ask one of them how she
+had spent her Sunday afternoon.
+
+"Without courage," said Sir Walter Scott, "there is no truth; and
+without truth there is no virtue." The sentence would have been itself
+more true if Sir Walter had written "candour" for "truth," for it is
+possible to be true in insolence, or true in cruelty. But in looking
+back from the ridges of the Hill Difficulty in my own past life, and in
+all the vision that has been given me of the wanderings in the ways of
+others--this, of all principles, has become to me surest--that the first
+virtue to be required of man is frankness of heart and lip: and I
+believe that every youth of sense and honour, putting himself to
+faithful question, would feel that he had the devil for confessor, if he
+had not his father or his friend.
+
+That a clergyman should ever be so truly the friend of his parishioners
+as to deserve their confidence from childhood upwards, may be flouted as
+a sentimental ideal; but he is assuredly only their enemy in showing his
+Lutheran detestation of the sale of indulgences by broadcasting these
+gratis from his pulpit.
+
+The inconvenience and unpleasantness of a catechism concerning itself
+with the personal practice as well as the general theory of duty, are
+indeed perfectly conceivable by me; yet I am not convinced that such
+manner of catechism would therefore be less medicinal; and during the
+past ten years it has often been matter of amazed thought with me, while
+our President at Corpus read prayers to the chapel benches, what might
+by this time have been the effect on the learning as well as the creed
+of the University, if, forty years ago, our stern old Dean Gaisford, of
+the House of Christ, instead of sending us to chapel as to the house of
+correction, when we missed a lecture, had inquired, before he allowed us
+to come to chapel at all, whether we were gamblers, harlot-mongers, or
+in concealed and selfish debt.
+
+I observe with extreme surprise in the preceding letters the
+unconsciousness of some of your correspondents, that there ever was such
+a thing as discipline in the Christian Church. Indeed, the last
+wholesome instance of it I can remember was when my own great-great
+uncle Maitland lifted Lady ---- from his altar rails, and led her back
+to her seat before the congregation, when she offered to take the
+Sacrament, being at enmity with her son.[45] But I believe a few hours
+honestly spent by any clergyman on his Church history would show him
+that the Church's confidence in her prayer has been always exactly
+proportionate to the strictness of her discipline; that her present
+fright at being caught praying by a chemist or an electrician, results
+mainly from her having allowed her twos and threes gathered in the name
+of Christ to become sixes and sevens gathered in the name of Belial;
+and that therefore her now needfullest duty is to explain to her
+stammering votaries, extremely doubtful as they are of the effect of
+their supplications either on politics or the weather, that although
+Elijah was a man subject to like passions as we are, he had them better
+under command; and that while the effectual fervent prayer of a
+righteous man availeth much, the formal and lukewarm one of an
+iniquitous man availeth--much the other way.
+
+ [45] In some of the country districts of Scotland the right of the
+ Church to interfere with the lives of private individuals is still
+ exercised. Only two years ago, a wealthy gentleman farmer was
+ rebuked by the "Kirk Session" of the Dissenting Church to which he
+ belonged, for infidelity to his wife.
+
+ At the Scottish half-yearly Communion the ceremony of "fencing the
+ tables" used to be observed; that is, turning away all those whose
+ lives were supposed to have made them unfit to receive the
+ Sacrament.
+
+Such an instruction, coupled with due explanation of the nature of
+righteousness and iniquity, directed mainly to those who have the power
+of both in their own hands, being makers of law, and holders of
+property, would, without any further debate, bring about a very singular
+change in the position and respectability of English clergymen.
+
+How far they may at present be considered as merely the Squire's left
+hand, bound to know nothing of what he is doing with his right, it is
+for their own consciences to determine.
+
+For instance, a friend wrote to me the other day, "Will you not come
+here? You will see a noble duke destroying a village as old as the
+Conquest, and driving out dozens of families whose names are in Domesday
+Book, because, owing to the neglect of his ancestors and rackrenting for
+a hundred years, the place has fallen out of repair, and the people are
+poor, and may become paupers. A local paper ventured to tell the truth.
+The duke's agent called on the editor, and threatened him with
+destruction if he did not hold his tongue." The noble duke, doubtless,
+has proper Protestant horror of auricular confession. But suppose,
+instead of the local editor, the local parson had ventured to tell the
+truth from his pulpit, and even to intimate to his Grace that he might
+no longer receive the Body and Blood of the Lord at the altar of that
+parish. The parson would scarcely--in these days--have been therefore
+made bonfire of, and had a pretty martyr's memorial by Mr. Scott's
+pupils; but he would have lighted a goodly light, nevertheless, in this
+England of ours, whose pettifogging piety has now neither the courage to
+deny a duke's grace in its church, nor to declare Christ's in its
+Parliament.
+
+Lastly. Several of your contributors, I observe, have rashly dipped
+their feet in the brim of the water of that raging question of Usury;
+and I cannot but express my extreme regret that you should yourself have
+yielded to the temptation of expressing opinions which you have had no
+leisure either to found or to test. My assertion, however, that the rich
+lived mainly by robbing the poor, referred not to Usury, but to Rent;
+and the facts respecting both these methods of extortion are perfectly
+and indubitably ascertainable by any person who himself wishes to
+ascertain them, and is able to take the necessary time and pains. I see
+no sign, throughout the whole of these letters, of any wish whatever, on
+the part of one of their writers, to ascertain the facts, but only to
+defend practices which they hold to be convenient in the world, and are
+afraid to blame in their congregations. Of the presumption with which
+several of the writers utter their notions on the subject, I do not
+think it would be right to speak farther, in an epilogue to which there
+is no reply, in the terms which otherwise would have been deserved. In
+their bearing on other topics, let me earnestly thank you (so far as my
+own feelings may be permitted voice in the matter) for the attention
+with which you have examined, and the courage with which you have
+ratified, or at least endured, letters which could not but bear at first
+the aspect of being written in a hostile--sometimes even in a mocking
+spirit. That aspect is untrue, nor am I answerable for it: the things of
+which I had to speak could not be shortly described but in terms which
+might sound satirical; for all error, if frankly shown, is precisely
+most ridiculous when it is most dangerous, and I have written no word
+which is not chosen as the exactest for its occasion, whether it move
+sigh or smile. In my earlier days I wrote much with the desire to
+please, and the hope of influencing the reader. As I grow older and
+older, I recognize the truth of the Preacher's saying, "Desire shall
+fail, and the mourners go about the streets;" and I content myself with
+saying, to whoso it may concern, that the thing is verily thus, whether
+they will hear or whether they will forbear. No man more than I has ever
+loved the places where God's honour dwells, or yielded truer allegiance
+to the teaching of His evident servants. No man at this time grieves
+more for the danger of the Church which supposes him her enemy, while
+she whispers procrastinating _pax vobiscum_ in answer to the spurious
+kiss of those who would fain toll curfew over the last fires of English
+faith, and watch the sparrow find nest where she may lay her young,
+around the altars of the Lord.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ APPENDIX
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin having kindly entrusted me with his valuable English
+thirteenth century MS. service book, referred to p. 295, I have thought
+it would be interesting to the readers of this volume to see a little
+more in detail some of the origins of our Litany and Collects. I think
+it will be owned that our Reformers failed to mend some of them in the
+translation. I am quite unversed in the reading of ancient MSS., but I
+hope the following, with the translation, will not be found incorrect. I
+have preserved neither the contractions nor the responses repeated after
+each petition, and have changed the mediæval "e" into "æ," as "terre"
+into "terræ."--EDITOR.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Ut dompnum apostolicum et omnes gradus ecclesiæ in sancta religione
+conservare digneris.
+
+ _Te rogamus, audi nos, Domine._
+
+Ut episcopum nostrum et gregem sibi commissum conservare digneris.
+
+ _Te rogamus...._
+
+Ut regi nostro et principibus nostris pacem et veram concordiam atque
+victoriam, donare digneris.
+
+Ut episcopos et abbates nostros et congregationes illis commissas in
+sancta religione conservare digneris.
+
+Ut congregationes omnium sanctorum in tuo sancto servitio conservare
+digneris.
+
+Ut cunctum populum Christianum precioso sanguine tuo conservare
+digneris.
+
+Ut omnibus benefactoribus nostris sempiterna bona retribuas.
+
+Ut animas nostras et parentum nostrorum ab eterna dampnatione eripias.
+
+Ut mentes nostras ad celestia desideria erigas.
+
+Ut obsequium servitutis nostræ rationabile facias.
+
+Ut locum istum et omnes habitantes in eo visitare et consolari digneris.
+
+Ut fructus terræ dare et conservare digneris.
+
+Ut inimicos sanctæ Dei ecclesiæ comprimere digneris.
+
+Ut oculos misericordiæ tuæ super nos reducere digneris.
+
+Ut miserias pauperum et captivorum intueri et relevare digneris.
+
+Ut omnibus fidelibus defunctis requiem eternam dones.
+
+Ut nos exaudire digneris.
+
+Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,
+
+ _Parce nobis Domine._
+
+Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,
+
+ _Exaudi nos._
+
+Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,
+
+ _Miserere nobis._
+
+Deus cui proprium est misereri semper et parcere suscipe deprecationem
+nostram et quos delictorum cathena constringit misericordia tuæ pietatis
+absolvas, per Jesum Christum.
+
+Ecclesiæ tuæ Domine, preces placatus admitte ut destructis
+adversitatibus universis secura tibi serviat libertate.
+
+Omnipotens sempiterne Deus qui facis mirabilia magna solus pretende
+super famulum tuum episcopum nostrum et super cunctas congregationes
+illi commissas spiritum gratiæ tuæ salutaris et ut in veritate tibi
+complaceant perpetuum eis rorem tuæ benedictionis infunde, per Jesum.
+
+Deus in cujus manu corda sunt regum qui es humilium consolator et
+fidelium fortitudo et protector omnium in te sperantium, da regi nostro
+et reginæ populoque Christiano, triumphum virtutis tuæ scienter
+excolere, ut per te semper reparentur ad veniam.
+
+Pretende Domine et famulis et famulabus tuis dexteram celestis auxilii
+ut te toto corde propinquant atque digne postulationes assequantur.
+
+Deus a quo sancta desideria recta consilia et justa sunt opera, da
+servis tuis illam quam mundus dare non potest pacem ut et corda nostra
+mandatis tuis et hostium ublata formidine tempora sint tua protectione
+tranquilla.
+
+Ure igne sancti spiritus renes nostros et cor nostrum, Domine, ut tibi
+corde casto serviamus et mundo corpore placeamus.
+
+
+ TRANSLATION
+
+That it may please Thee to keep the apostolic lord (_i.e._ the Pope) and
+all ranks of the Church in Thy holy religion.
+
+ _O Lord, we beseech Thee, hear us._
+
+That it may please Thee to keep our bishop, and the flock committed to
+him.
+
+That it may please Thee to give to our king and our princes (or chief
+lords), peace, and true concord, and victory.
+
+That it may please Thee to keep our bishops and abbots, and the
+congregations committed to them, in holy religion.
+
+That it may please Thee to keep the congregations of all saints in Thy
+holy service.
+
+That it may please Thee to keep the whole Christian people with Thy
+precious blood.
+
+That it may please Thee to requite all our benefactors with everlasting
+blessings.
+
+That it may please Thee to preserve our souls and the souls of our
+kindred from eternal damnation.
+
+That it may please Thee that Thou wouldest lift up our hearts to
+heavenly desires.
+
+That it may please Thee to make the obedience of our service reasonable.
+
+That it may please Thee to visit and to comfort this place, and all who
+dwell in it.
+
+That it may please Thee to give and preserve the fruits of the earth.
+
+That it may please Thee to restrain the enemies of the Holy Church of
+God.
+
+That it may please Thee to look upon us with eyes of mercy.
+
+That it may please Thee to behold and relieve the miseries of the poor
+and the prisoners.
+
+That it may please Thee to give eternal peace to all the faithful
+departed.
+
+That it may please Thee to hear us.
+
+Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world.
+
+ _Spare us, O Lord._
+
+Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world.
+
+ _Hear us, O Lord._
+
+Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world.
+
+ _Have mercy on us, O Lord._
+
+O God, whose property it is always to pity and to spare, receive our
+supplications, and by the mercy of Thy fatherly love, loose those whom
+the chain of their sins keeps bound, through Jesus Christ our Lord.
+
+O Lord, receive with indulgence the prayers of Thy Church, that all
+adversities being overcome, it may serve Thee in freedom without fear.
+
+Almighty, Eternal God, who alone doest great wonders, grant to Thy
+servant our bishop, and to all the congregations committed to him, the
+healthful spirit of Thy grace; and that they may please Thee in truth,
+pour out upon them the perpetual dew of Thy blessing.
+
+O God, in whose hand are the hearts of kings, who art the consoler of
+the meek and the strength of the faithful, and the protector of all that
+trust in Thee, give to our king and queen and to the Christian people
+wisely to manifest the glory of Thy power, that by Thee they may ever be
+restored to forgiveness.
+
+Extend, O Lord, over Thy servants and handmaidens, the right hand of Thy
+heavenly aid, that they may draw near unto Thee with all their heart,
+and worthily obtain their petitions.
+
+Kindle with the fire of Thy Holy Spirit our reins and our hearts, O
+Lord, that we may serve Thee with a clean heart, and please Thee with a
+pure body.
+
+O God, from whom are all holy desires, right counsels, and just works,
+give unto Thy servants that peace which the world cannot give, that both
+our hearts (may obey) Thy commands, and the fear of the enemy being
+taken away, we may have quiet times by Thy protection.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Upon one of the blank leaves of this MS. are some interesting remarks
+upon its probable date, furnished by Mr. Ruskin himself. "The style, and
+pieces of inner evidence in all this book speak it clearly of the first
+half of the thirteenth century. The architecture is all round
+arched--the roofs of Norman simplicity--unpinnacled--the severe and
+simple forms of letter are essentially Norman, and the leaf and ball
+terminations of the spiral of the extremities, exactly intermediate
+between the Norman and Gothic types. The ivy and geranium leaves begin
+to show themselves long before the end of the thirteenth century, and
+there is not a trace of them in this book." This evidence of early date,
+however, is qualified by the further statement, "old styles sometimes
+hold on long in provincial MSS."
+
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _April 14th, 1881_.
+
+
+ THE END
+
+ _Printed by_ BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO.
+ _Edinburgh and London_
+
+
+
+
+ _WORKS BY JOHN RUSKIN_
+
+ MODERN PAINTERS. In 5 vols. with all the Woodcuts, 1 Lithograph,
+ and the 89 Full-Page Steel Engravings. The text is that of the 1873
+ Edition, with Notes, and a New Epilogue. Cloth, £6, 6s. the 5
+ vols., imp. 8vo.
+
+ THE STONES OF VENICE. Complete Edition. (Imperial 8vo.) 3 vols.
+ with the 53 Plates and the Text as originally issued, and Index.
+ Cloth, £4, 4s. the 3 vols.
+
+ EXAMPLES OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF VENICE. With the Text and the 16
+ Plates as originally published. Cloth cover (unbound), atlas folio
+ (about 25 in. by 17 in.), £2, 2s.
+
+ THE POETRY OF ARCHITECTURE; or, The Architecture of the Nations of
+ Europe considered in its Association with Natural Scenery and
+ National Character. With Frontispiece in Colour, 14 Plates in
+ Photogravure, and 9 Full-Page and other Woodcuts. 4to, cloth,
+ 21s.
+
+ VERONA, AND OTHER LECTURES. Delivered principally at the Royal and
+ London Institutions between 1870 and 1883. With Frontispiece in
+ colour and 11 Photogravure Plates. Med. 8vo, cloth, 15s.
+
+ ON THE OLD ROAD: a Collection of Miscellaneous Pamphlets, Articles,
+ and Essays (1834-84). In 3 vols., 8vo, cloth, 30s. (Not sold
+ separately.)
+
+ ARROWS OF THE CHACE: being a Collection of the Scattered Letters of
+ John Ruskin (1840-1880). With Preface. In 2 vols. cloth, 8vo,
+ 20s. (Not sold separately.)
+
+ PRÆTERITA. Outlines of Scenes and Thoughts perhaps Worthy of Memory
+ in my Past Life. Vols. I. and II. of this autobiography now ready,
+ in cloth, 13s. each, med. 8vo.
+
+ THE ART OF ENGLAND. Six Lectures delivered at Oxford in 1883. With
+ Appendix and Index. Cloth, 6s., 4to.
+
+ UNTO THIS LAST. Four Essays on the First Principles of Political
+ Economy. Tenth Edition. Cloth, 3s.; roan, gilt edges, 4s.,
+ fcap. 8vo.
+
+ SELECTIONS FROM RUSKIN. 2 vols. crown 8vo, with Index. (Sold
+ separately), cloth, 6s. each; roan, gilt edges, 8s. 6d. each.
+
+ THE FIRST SERIES (from Works written between 1843 and 1860), with
+ engraved Portrait.
+
+ THE SECOND SERIES (from Works written between 1860 and 1888), with
+ Photogravure Portrait.
+
+ FRONDES AGRESTES. Readings in "Modern Painters." Thirteenth Edition.
+ Cloth, 3s.; roan, gilt edges, 4s.
+
+
+ _Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. each; roan, gilt edges, 7s. 6d. each._
+
+ SESAME AND LILIES. A Small Complete Edition, containing the Three
+ Lectures, with long Preface and Index.
+
+ MUNERA PULVERIS. Six Essays on the Elements of Political Economy.
+ Second Edition, with Index.
+
+ The EAGLE'S NEST. Ten Lectures on the Relation of Natural Science
+ to Art. Third Edition, with Index.
+
+ TIME and TIDE, by WEARE and TYNE. Twenty-five Letters to a Working
+ Man of Sunderland on Laws of Work. Fourth Edition, with Index.
+
+ The CROWN of WILD OLIVE. Four Essays on Work, Traffic, War, and the
+ Future of England. With Articles on the Economy of the Kings of
+ Prussia. Ninth Edition, with Index.
+
+ QUEEN of the AIR: a Study of the Greek Myths of Cloud and Storm.
+ Sixth Edition, with Index.
+
+ The TWO PATHS. Lectures on Art and its Application to Decoration
+ and Manufacture. Delivered in 1858-59. With New Preface and Added
+ Notes. Third Edition.
+
+ "A JOY FOR EVER" (and its Price in the Market). The Substance of
+ Two Lectures on the Political Economy of Art. With New Preface and
+ Added Articles. Third Edition, with Index.
+
+ LECTURES on ART, delivered at Oxford in 1870. With Preface. Seventh
+ Edition, with Index.
+
+ The ETHICS of the DUST. Ten Lectures to Little Housewives on the
+ Elements of Crystallisation. Eighth Edition.
+
+ The ELEMENTS of DRAWING. In Three Letters to Beginners, with Index.
+ Illustrated.
+
+ The STONES of VENICE: Selections for the Use of Travellers. 2 vols.
+ cloth, 5s. each. Sixth Edition, with Index.
+
+
+ _Small post 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d. each; roan, gilt edges, 10s. each,
+ complete with all the Plates._
+
+ The SEVEN LAMPS of ARCHITECTURE. The 14 Plates for this Edition
+ have been specially prepared from the larger Work. Sixth Edition.
+
+ ARATRA PENTILICI: Seven Lectures on the Elements of Sculpture. With
+ 1 Engraving on Steel and 20 Autotype Plates.
+
+ VAL D'ARNO. Ten Lectures on Art of the Thirteenth Century in Pisa
+ and Florence. With 1 Steel Engraving and 12 Autotype Plates.
+
+ ARIADNE FLORENTINA: Six Lectures on Wood and Metal Engraving, and
+ Appendix. With 4 Full-Page Facsimiles from Holbein's "Dance of
+ Death," and 12 Autotype Plates.
+
+ LECTURES on ARCHITECTURE and PAINTING. Delivered at Edinburgh in
+ November, 1853. With 15 Full-Page Illustrations drawn by the
+ Author.
+
+ THE HARBOURS OF ENGLAND. With the 12 Illustrations by TURNER,
+ reproduced in Photogravure, and an Introduction by T. J. WISE.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ FORS CLAVIGERA: Letters to the Labourers and Workmen of Great
+ Britain. A New Cheap Edition, with all the Illustrations. In Four
+ Volumes, each with an Index, crown 8vo, cloth, 6s. each; roan,
+ gilt edges, 8s. 6d. each.
+
+ VOL. I. containing Letters I. to XXIV., 530 pages. [_Just out._
+ VOL. II. containing Letters XXV. to XLVIII.,
+ about 500 pages. [ _In May._
+ VOL. III. containing Letters XLIX. to LXXII. } _In the
+ VOL. IV. containing Letters LXXIII. to XCVI. } Autumn._
+
+ LETTERS TO THE CLERGY: On the Lord's Prayer and the Church. Edited
+ by Rev. F. A. MALLESON. Third Edition, with Additional Letters by
+ Mr. RUSKIN, crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. The last Edition, published in
+ 1883, has long been out of print.
+
+ THREE LETTERS and AN ESSAY on LITERATURE, 1836-1841. Found in his
+ Tutor's Desk. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3s.
+
+ LETTERS TO A COLLEGE FRIEND, 1840-1845, including an Essay on
+ "Death before Adam Fell." Crown 8vo, cloth, 4s.
+
+ HORTUS INCLUSUS. Messages from the Wood to the Garden. Being
+ Letters to the Sister Ladies of the Thwaite, Coniston. Second
+ Edition. Cloth, 4s.
+
+ THE OXFORD MUSEUM. By Sir HENRY ACLAND. With Letters from JOHN
+ RUSKIN and New Preface by Sir HENRY ACLAND. With Portrait of Mr.
+ Ruskin, taken in 1893, an Engraving of Capital, and a Plan. Crown
+ 8vo, cloth, 4s.
+
+ RUSKIN ON MUSIC: being Extracts from the Works of JOHN RUSKIN.
+ Intended for the Use of all interested in the Art of Music.
+
+ Edited by Miss A. M. WAKEFIELD. With Frontispiece in Colour.
+ Med. 8vo, cloth, 5s. net; half-parchment, 6s. 6d. net.
+
+ STUDIES IN RUSKIN: Some Aspects of Mr. Ruskin's Work and Teaching.
+ By EDWARD T. COOK. 13 Woodcuts. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s.; roan, gilt
+ edges, 7s. 6d. Second Edition.
+
+ Also a Large-Paper Edition, crown 4to, price 12s. 6d.
+ Containing, in addition to the Woodcuts, 13 Autotypes of
+ Drawings by Mr. RUSKIN. With Descriptive Text.
+
+ THE PRINCIPLES OF ART. As Illustrated by Examples in the Ruskin
+ Museum at Sheffield. Compiled by WILLIAM WHITE from Mr. Ruskin's
+ Works, with some unpublished Matter and 6 Photogravure Plates. Demy
+ 8vo, 10s. 6d. net.
+
+
+ _MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS_
+
+ OLD FRENCH ROMANCES. Done into English by WILLIAM MORRIS. With an
+ Introduction by JOSEPH JACOBS.
+
+ "King Coustans the Emperor. The Friendship of Amis and Amile. King
+ Floras and the Fair Jehane. Story of Over Sea." Crown 8vo, cloth,
+ gilt top, 4s. 6d. net.
+
+ THROUGH THE DOLOMITES, from VENICE to TOBLACH. A Practical,
+ Historical, and Descriptive Guide-Book. By the Rev. ALEXANDER
+ ROBERTSON, D.D. (of Venice).
+
+ With 42 Full-Page Illustrations reproduced from Pictures by W.
+ LOGSDAIL, H. G. KEASBEY, and from Photographs, with a Map of the
+ District. Also an Appendix giving Tables of Railway and Diligence
+ Stations, Times, Fares, &c., Carriage Tariffs, Charges for Guides,
+ Hotels, &c. Small crown 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d.
+
+ This is intended to be a supplementary volume to Mr. HARE'S
+ "Cities of Northern Italy," and is the only guide of the kind
+ dealing with the great highway through that beautiful mountain
+ district, which is becoming more and more the resort of
+ travellers.
+
+ "AS OTHERS SEE US." A Series of Volumes giving Impressions of
+ England and of English Life by various Continental Authors. Edited
+ by JOSEPH JACOBS. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. each.
+
+ I. THE ENGLAND OF TO-DAY. From the Portuguese of OLIVEIRA MARTINS.
+ Translated by C. J. WILLDEY, 340 pages.
+
+ II. ACROSS THE CHANNEL. From the French of GABRIEL MOUREY ("GIL
+ BLAS").
+
+ _OTHER VOLUMES TO FOLLOW._
+
+ BROWNING AND THE CHRISTIAN FAITH. On the Evidences of Christianity
+ from Browning's Point of View. By EDWARD BERDOE. Crown 8vo, cloth,
+ 5s.; 256 pages. [_Just out._
+
+ BROWNING STUDIES. By Bishop WESTCOTT, Professor CORSON, Mrs.
+ IRELAND, and other Members of the Browning Society. With an
+ Introduction by EDWARD BERDOE. Demy 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d.
+
+ SPENSER'S "FAERIE QUEENE." With over 90 Full-page Illustrations,
+ besides 150 Headings and Tailpieces by WALTER CRANE.
+
+ A limited Edition on Arnold's Hand-made Paper, large post 4to, in
+ NINETEEN Monthly Parts, price 10s. 6d. net each Part. No odd
+ Parts supplied separately.
+
+ The Text (which has been collated from Four Editions, including
+ that of 1590) is edited by THOMAS J. WISE.
+
+ BOOKS I. to IV., price £1, 11s. 6d. each; cloth, £1, 14s.
+ each.
+
+ PART XIII., with 4 Full-page Designs, 5 Canto Headings, and 4
+ Tailpieces. [_Just out._
+
+ THE MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR. In Eight Designs. By WALTER CRANE.
+ Printed on Japanese silk paper, and mounted on cardboard. Each copy
+ is signed by Mr. CRANE and numbered. Buckram, gilt top, plates
+ guarded, imperial 4to, 21s. net.
+
+ OLD-WORLD JAPAN: Legends of the Land of the Gods. By FRANK RINDER.
+ With 34 Pictures and Cover designed by T. H. ROBINSON. Cloth, gilt
+ top, 6s.
+
+ JACOB AND THE RAVEN. By FRANCES MARY PEARD. With other Stories for
+ Children, and 39 Illustrations by HEYWOOD SUMNER. Large crown 8vo,
+ cloth, gilt edges, 5s.
+
+ THE HISTORY OF HUON OF BORDEAUX: A Legend of the Time of
+ Charlemagne. By ROBERT STEELE. With 22 Illustrations by FRED.
+ MASON. Antique Paper. Fcap. 4to, cloth, 10s. 6d.
+
+ PRIDE AND PREJUDICE. By JANE AUSTEN. With 100 Illustrations by HUGH
+ THOMSON, and an Introduction by GEORGE SAINTSBURY. Crown 8vo, cloth
+ gilt, 6s.
+
+ MARMONTEL'S MORAL TALES. Selected and Re-translated, with
+ Biographical and Critical Introduction and Notes by GEORGE
+ SAINTSBURY, and 45 Illustrations by CHRIS. HAMMOND. Crown 8vo,
+ cloth, gilt top or edges, 6s.
+
+ SIR CHARLES GRANDISON. By SAMUEL RICHARDSON. The Letters being
+ Selected and Arranged to form a connected Narrative, with
+ Biographical and Critical Introduction and Notes, by GEORGE
+ SAINTSBURY, and 60 Drawings by CHRIS. HAMMOND. In 2 vols., crown
+ 8vo, cloth, gilt tops or edges, 12s.
+
+ HANS ANDERSEN'S STORIES AND FAIRY TALES. Translated by H. OSKAR
+ SOMMER. With over One Hundred Pictures and Initial Letters by
+ ARTHUR J. GASKIN. In 2 vols., large crown 8vo, 6s. each. Sold
+ separately.
+
+ A few of the Special Large-Paper Copies on Arnold's Hand-made Paper
+ still remain. Crown 4to, £2, 2s. net, the 2 vols.
+
+ LEGENDS FROM RIVER AND MOUNTAIN. Translated from the Roumanian and
+ German by CARMEN SYLVA (H.M. the Queen of Roumania) and ALMA
+ STRETTELL. With 40 Illustrations by T. H. ROBINSON. Large crown
+ 8vo, cloth, gilt top, 6s.
+
+ SLAV TALES. Translated from the French of CHODSKO, and Illustrated
+ with 60 Drawings by EMILY J. HARDING. Large crown 8vo, cloth, gilt
+ top, 6s.
+
+ THE MEMORIES AND THOUGHTS OF A LIFE. By Judge O'CONNOR MORRIS. This
+ book is chiefly conversant with Ireland during the last Sixty
+ Years. Demy 8vo, cloth. 12s. 6d., with Portrait.
+
+ LULLABIES OF MANY LANDS. Collected and rendered into English by
+ ALMA STRETTELL. With 77 Illustrations and specially designed Cover
+ by EMILY HARDING. Fcap. 4to, cloth, 7s. 6d.
+
+ THE DISAGREEABLE DUKE. A Christmas Whimsicality for Holiday Girls
+ and Boys. By ELLINOR DAVENPORT ADAMS. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3s. 6d.
+
+ A MODEL WIFE, AND OTHER STORIES. By Mrs. COMYNS CARR. Crown 8vo,
+ cloth, 3s. 6d.
+
+ THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF THOMAS PELHAM DALE. By HELEN PELHAM DALE.
+ With 4 Photogravure Portraits, 6 Plates in Colour, and other
+ Illustrations. In 2 vols., crown 8vo, cloth, 12s. 6d.
+
+ SONGS OF A PARISH PRIEST. By Rev. BASIL EDWARDS. With Woodcut of
+ Churchyard Cross. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, parchment, 2s.;
+ cloth, 2s. 6d.
+
+ REVOLUTION AND REACTION IN MODERN FRANCE. By G. LOWES DICKINSON.
+ The Substance of Lectures dealing with the History of France, from
+ 1789 to 1871. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s.
+
+ A BOOK OF PICTURED CAROLS. With 12 Full-Page Designs by Members of
+ the Birmingham Art School. Hand-printed on Hand-made Paper, 74
+ pages. Fcap. 4to, 5s.
+
+ THE GARDEN OF JAPAN: a Year's Diary of its Flowers. By F. T.
+ PIGGOTT, M.A. With Two Full-Page Plates of Japanese Flowers in
+ Colour, and other Illustrations by the Author, including some
+ Coloured Ornaments on Title-Pages. Also Four Pictures by ALFRED
+ EAST, R.I. Hand-printed, demy 4to, Japanese Vellum, 10s. 6d.
+
+ _WORKS BY AUGUSTUS J. C. HARE_
+
+ LIFE AND LETTERS OF FRANCES, BARONESS BUNSEN. Third Edition. With
+ Portraits. 2 vols., crown 8vo, 21s.
+
+ MEMORIALS OF A QUIET LIFE. 3 vols., crown 8vo. Vols. I. and II.,
+ 21s. (Nineteenth Edition); Vol. III., with numerous Photographs,
+ 10s. 6d.
+
+ DAYS NEAR ROME. With more than 100 Illustrations by the Author.
+ Third Edition. 2 vols., crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+ WALKS IN ROME. Thirteenth Edition, revised. With Map. 2 vols.,
+ fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 10s.
+
+ WALKS IN LONDON. Sixth Edition, revised. With additional
+ Illustrations. 2 vols., fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 12s.
+
+ WESTMINSTER. Reprinted from "Walks in London," as a Handy Guide.
+ 120 pages. Paper covers, 6d. _net_; cloth, 1s.
+
+ WANDERINGS IN SPAIN. With 17 full-page Illustrations. Fifth
+ Edition. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+ CITIES OF SOUTHERN ITALY AND SICILY. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo,
+ 10s. 6d.
+
+ CITIES OF NORTHERN ITALY. Second Edition. With Illustrations. 2
+ vols., crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+ CITIES OF CENTRAL ITALY. Second Edition. With Illustrations. 2
+ vols., crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+ SKETCHES IN HOLLAND AND SCANDINAVIA. Crown 8vo, with Illustrations,
+ 3s. 6d.
+
+ STUDIES IN RUSSIA. Crown 8vo, with numerous Illustrations, 10s.
+ 6d.
+
+ FLORENCE. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, Illustrated, cloth limp, 3s.
+
+ VENICE. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 3s. With
+ Illustrations.
+
+ PARIS. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s.; or in 2 vols,
+ cloth limp, 10s. 6d.
+
+ DAYS NEAR PARIS. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s.; or
+ in 2 vols., cloth limp, 10s. 6d.
+
+ NORTH-EASTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and
+ 86 Woodcuts. 532 pages.
+
+ Picardy--Abbeville and Amiens--Paris and its Environs--Arras and
+ the Manufacturing Towns of the North--Champagne--Nancy and the
+ Vosges, &c.
+
+
+ SOUTH-EASTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and 176
+ Woodcuts. 600 pages.
+
+ The different lines to the South--Burgundy--Auvergne--The
+ Cantal--Provence--The Alpes Dauphinaises and Alpes Maritimes;
+ &c.
+
+ SOUTH-WESTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and 232
+ Woodcuts. 664 pages.
+
+ The Loire--The Gironde and Landes--Creuse--Corrèze--The
+ Limousin--Gascony and Languedoc--The Cevennes and the Pyrenees,
+ &c.
+
+ NORTH-WESTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and 73
+ Woodcuts. 410 pages.
+
+ Normandy and Brittany--Rouen--Dieppe--Cherbourg--Bayeux--Caen--
+ Coutances--Chartres--Mont S. Michel--Dinan--Brest--Alençon, &c.
+
+ SUSSEX. With Map and 40 Woodcuts. Crown 8vo, cloth, 6s.
+
+ THE STORY OF TWO NOBLE LIVES: CHARLOTTE, COUNTESS CANNING, and
+ LOUISA, MARCHIONESS OF WATERFORD. In 3 vols. of about 450 pages
+ each. Crown 8vo, cloth, £1, 11s. 6d. 32 Plates in Photogravure from
+ Lady Waterford's Drawings, and 32 Woodcuts.
+
+ Also a Special Large-Paper Edition, with India Proofs of the
+ Plates. Crown 4to, £3, 3s. net.
+
+ THE GURNEYS OF EARLHAM: Being Memoirs and Letters of the Eleven
+ Children of JOHN and CATHERINE GURNEY of Earlham, 1775-1875, and
+ the Story of their Religious Life under Many Different Forms.
+ Illustrated with 33 Photogravure Plates and 19 Woodcuts. In 2
+ vols., crown 8vo, cloth, 25s. 712 pages.
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES: Being Memorial Sketches of ARTHUR PENRHYN
+ STANLEY, Dean of Westminster; HENRY ALFORD, Dean of Canterbury;
+ Mrs. DUNCAN STEWART; and PARAY LE MONIAL. Illustrated with 7
+ Portraits and 17 Woodcuts. 1 vol., crown 8vo, cloth, 8s. 6d.
+
+
+ _GEORGE ALLEN, 156, CHARING CROSS ROAD, LONDON_
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber's Notes:
+
+
+1. P. 37: "Mis-understanding" is chosen to be written with a hyphen
+("But, at all events, it is surely the pastor's duty to prevent his
+flock from _mis_-understanding it...")
+
+2. P. 5 of the Appendix: "Miscellaneons" changed to "Miscellaneous" in
+the header of the page.
+
+3. The words that were chosen to be written with a hyphen: mustard-seed
+(p. 23), Janus-faced (p. 31), thorough-going (p. 116), slow-witted (p.
+116), simple-minded (p. 126), so-called (p. 126), animad-versions (p.
+245), Hand-made (p. 6, Appendix), Hand-printed (p. 7, Appendix)
+
+4. The words that were chosen to be written without a hyphen:
+overcrowding (p. 91), shortcomings (p. 172), overthrow (p. 178),
+widespread (p. 180).
+
+5. Added quotes (p. 153, '... for clerky people."')
+
+6. Added period after the Greek epigraph to letters VII (p. 19) and X
+(p. 36).
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Letters to the Clergy, by John Ruskin
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS TO THE CLERGY ***
+
+***** This file should be named 39283-8.txt or 39283-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/9/2/8/39283/
+
+Produced by Paul Murray, Elizaveta Shevyakhova and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/39283-8.zip b/39283-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..aa593a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39283-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39283-h.zip b/39283-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..60841f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39283-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39283-h/39283-h.htm b/39283-h/39283-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a77c43d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39283-h/39283-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,11066 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<!-- $Id: header.txt 236 2009-12-07 18:57:00Z vlsimpson $ -->
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of Letters to the Clergy on The Lord's Prayer and the Church, by John Ruskin.
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+a:link {
+ color: #838B8B;
+ text-decoration: none;
+ font-weight: bold;
+}
+
+a:visited {
+ color: #8B7355;
+ text-decoration: none;
+ font-weight: bold;
+}
+
+a:hover {
+ color: #CCCCCC;
+ text-decoration: none;
+ font-weight: bold;
+}
+
+a:active {
+ color: #CCCCCC;
+ text-decoration: none;
+ font-weight: bold;
+}
+
+body {
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+
+
+h1,h2,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+h3 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+ margin-top: 3em;
+}
+
+h4 {
+ text-align: center;
+ clear: both;
+ margin-top: 3em;
+}
+
+.heading {
+ margin-top: 0em
+}
+
+p {
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+}
+
+.ad {
+ margin-left: 1em;
+ text-indent: -1em;
+}
+
+.noindent {
+ margin-left: 1em;
+}
+
+hr {
+ width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+table {
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+}
+
+.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ /* visibility: hidden; */
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+ font-size: 75%;
+ text-indent: 0em;
+ border-top: solid gray 1px;
+ border-bottom: solid gray 1px;
+ background-color: inherit;
+ font-weight: normal;
+ font-style: normal;
+ font-variant: normal;
+ text-decoration: none;
+} /* page numbers */
+
+.sidelink {
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+ font-size: 75%;
+ text-indent: 0em;
+ background-color: inherit;
+ font-weight: normal;
+ font-style: normal;
+ font-variant: normal;
+ text-decoration: none;
+}
+
+.linenum {
+ position: absolute;
+ top: auto;
+ left: 4%;
+} /* poetry number */
+
+.blockquot {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+.sidenote {
+ width: 20%;
+ padding-bottom: .5em;
+ padding-top: .5em;
+ padding-left: .5em;
+ padding-right: .5em;
+ margin-left: 1em;
+ float: right;
+ clear: right;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ color: black;
+ background: #eeeeee;
+ border: dashed 1px;
+}
+
+.bb {border-bottom: solid 2px;}
+
+.bl {border-left: solid 2px;}
+
+.bt {border-top: solid 2px;}
+
+.br {border-right: solid 2px;}
+
+.bbox {border: solid 2px;}
+
+.center {text-align: center;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ padding-right: 3em;
+}
+
+.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+
+
+
+.right {
+ text-align: right;
+ margin-top: 1.5em;
+}
+
+.rightsign {
+ text-align: right;
+}
+
+.signature {margin-left: 4em;}
+
+.signlast
+{
+ padding-left: 8em;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+}
+
+.signlast11
+{
+ padding-left: 11em;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+}
+
+.signlast12
+{
+ padding-left: 12em;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+}
+
+.signlast1
+{
+ padding-left: 6em;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+}
+
+.signlast2
+{
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+}
+
+.grk {font-style: normal; font-family:"Palatino Linotype","New Athena Unicode",Gentium,"Lucida Grande", Galilee, "Arial Unicode MS", sans-serif;}
+
+.centgrk {font-style: normal;
+ font-family:"Palatino Linotype","New Athena Unicode",Gentium,"Lucida Grande", Galilee, "Arial Unicode MS", sans-serif;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+
+.smcapcent
+{
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.smcapright
+{
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+ text-align: right;
+}
+
+.smallcent
+{
+ font-size: 75%;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.smcapindent {
+ margin-left: 1em;
+ padding-left: 1em;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+}
+
+.indent {
+ margin-left: 2em;
+}
+
+.u {text-decoration: underline;}
+
+.caption {font-weight: bold;}
+
+/* Images */
+.figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.figleft {
+ float: left;
+ clear: left;
+ margin-left: 0;
+ margin-bottom: 1em;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ padding: 0;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.figright {
+ float: right;
+ clear: right;
+ margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-bottom:
+ 1em;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ margin-right: 0;
+ padding: 0;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.list {
+ margin-left: 2em;
+}
+
+/* Footnotes */
+.footnotes {border: dashed 1px;}
+
+.footnote {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 5%;
+ font-size: 0.9em;
+}
+
+.footfirst {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 5%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ font-size: 0.9em;
+}
+
+
+.footnote .label {
+ position: absolute;
+ right: 84%;
+ text-align: right;
+}
+
+.fnanchor {
+ vertical-align: super;
+ font-size: .8em;
+ text-decoration:
+ none;
+}
+
+/* Poetry */
+.poem {
+ margin-left:10%;
+ margin-right:10%;
+ text-align: left;
+}
+
+.poem br {display: none;}
+
+.poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;}
+
+.poem span.i0 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 0em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i2 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 2em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+.poem span.i3 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 3em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i4 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 4em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i6 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 6em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+.poem span.i8 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 8em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i10 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 10em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i12 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 12em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i16 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 16em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Letters to the Clergy, by John Ruskin
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Letters to the Clergy
+ On The Lord's Prayer and the Church
+
+Author: John Ruskin
+
+Editor: F. A. Malleson
+
+Release Date: March 27, 2012 [EBook #39283]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS TO THE CLERGY ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Paul Murray, Elizaveta Shevyakhova and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/i001.jpg" alt="Ruskin House" title="" />
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h1>LETTERS</h1>
+
+<h1>TO THE CLERGY</h1>
+
+<h4 class="heading">ON</h4>
+
+<h2>The Lord's Prayer and the Church</h2>
+
+<h3><span class="smcap">By</span> JOHN RUSKIN, LL.D., D.C.L.</h3>
+
+
+
+<h4 class="heading">WITH REPLIES FROM CLERGY AND LAITY, AND
+AN EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN</h4>
+
+<p> &nbsp; </p>
+
+<h5>EDITED, WITH ESSAYS AND COMMENTS, BY THE</h5>
+
+<h3 class="heading">REV. F. A. MALLESON, M.A.</h3>
+
+<h5>VICAR OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS</h5>
+<p> &nbsp; </p>
+<p> &nbsp; </p>
+
+
+<h4 class="heading">THIRD EDITION</h4>
+
+
+<h4 class="heading"><i>WITH ADDITIONAL LETTERS BY MR. RUSKIN</i></h4>
+<p> &nbsp; </p>
+<p> &nbsp; </p>
+
+<h4 class="heading">LONDON</h4>
+
+<h4 class="heading">GEORGE ALLEN, 156, CHARING CROSS ROAD</h4>
+
+<h4 class="heading">1896</h4>
+
+<h6>[<i>All rights reserved</i>]</h6>
+
+
+<p> &nbsp; </p>
+<p> &nbsp; </p>
+
+<h6><i>Printed by</i> <span class="smcap">Ballantyne, Hanson &amp; Co</span></h6>
+
+<h6><i>At the Ballantyne Press</i></h6>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">v</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#CONTENTS">ToC</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="INTRODUCTION" id="INTRODUCTION"></a>INTRODUCTION</h2>
+
+
+<p>The first reading of the Letters to the
+Clerical Society to which they were first
+addressed in September 1879, twenty-three
+clergy being present, was prefaced
+with the following remarks:&mdash;</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>A few words by way of introduction
+will be absolutely necessary before I
+proceed to read Mr. Ruskin's letters.
+They originated simply in a proposal
+of mine, which met with so ready and
+willing a response, that it almost seemed
+like a simultaneous thought. They are
+addressed nominally to myself, as representing
+the body of clergy whose
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">vi</a></span>secretary I have the honour to be; they
+are, in fact, therefore addressed to this
+Society primarily. But in the course
+of the next month or two they will also
+be read to two other Clerical Societies,&mdash;the
+Ormskirk and the Brighton
+(junior),&mdash;who have acceded to my proposals
+with much kindness, and in the
+first case have invited me of their own
+accord. I have undertaken, to the
+best of my ability, to arrange and set
+down the various expressions of opinion,
+which will be freely uttered. In so
+limited a time, many who may have
+much to say that would be really valuable
+will find no time to-day to deliver
+it. Of these brethren, I beg that they
+will do me the favour to express their
+views at their leisure, in writing. The
+original letters, the discussions, the
+letters which may be suggested, and a
+few comments of the Editor's, will be
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">vii</a></span>published in a volume which will appear,
+I trust, in the beginning of the next
+year.</p>
+
+<p>I will now, if you please, undertake
+the somewhat dangerous responsibility
+of avowing my own impressions of the
+letters I am about to read to you.
+I own that I believe I see in these
+papers the development of a principle of
+the deepest interest and importance,&mdash;namely,
+the application of the highest
+standard in the interpretation of the
+Gospel message <i>to</i> ourselves as clergymen,
+and <i>from</i> ourselves to our congregations.
+We have plenty elsewhere of
+doctrine and dogma, and undefinable
+shades of theological opinion. Let us
+turn at last to practical questions presented
+for our consideration by an
+eminent layman whose field of work
+lies quite as much in religion and ethics,
+as it does, reaching to so splendid an
+eminence, in Art. A man is wanted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">viii</a></span>
+to show to both clergy and laity something
+of the full force and meaning of
+Gospel teaching. Many there are, and
+I am of this number, whose cry is
+"<i>Exoriare aliquis</i>."</p>
+
+<p>I ask you, if possible, to do in an
+hour what I have been for the last two
+months trying to do, to divest myself
+of old forms of thought, to cast off self-indulgent
+views of our duty as ministers
+of religion, to lift ourselves out of those
+grooves in which we are apt to run so
+smoothly and so complacently, persuading
+ourselves that all is well just as
+it is, and to endeavour to strike into a
+sterner, harder path, beset with difficulties,
+but still the path of duty. These
+papers will demand a close, a patient,
+and in some places, a few will think,
+an indulgent consideration; but as a
+whole, the standard taken is, as I firmly
+believe, speaking only for myself, lofty<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">ix</a></span>
+and Christian to the extent of an almost
+ideal perfection. If we do go forward
+straight in the direction which Mr.
+Ruskin points out, I know we shall
+come, sooner or later, to a chasm right
+across our path. Some of us, I hope,
+will undauntedly cross it. Let each
+judge for himself, <span title="tĂ´ telei pistin pherĂ´n" class="grk">
+<i>τῷ τέλει πίστιν φέÏων</i></span>.</p></blockquote>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">xi</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#CONTENTS">ToC</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="PREFACE" id="PREFACE"></a>PREFACE</h2>
+
+<h3>TO THE THIRD EDITION</h3>
+
+
+<p>Having been urged to bring out a new
+edition of the volume first edited by me
+in 1880, and having willingly accepted
+the invitation to do so, it will naturally
+be expected that I should give some
+account of the circumstances which have
+led me to take the somewhat unusual
+step of reviving a book which has for
+twelve years been lying in a state of
+suspended animation.</p>
+
+<p>On the first conception of this volume
+I applied to Messrs. Strahan, to produce
+it before the reading and thinking world.
+I should have done more wisely, no<span class="pagenum">
+<a name="Page_xii" id="Page_xii">xii</a></span>
+doubt, had I offered the publication to
+Mr. George Allen, Mr. Ruskin's well-known
+publisher. It avails not to explain
+why I chose a different course, of
+which subsequent events only too soon
+showed me the error; for after the
+first edition had been sold off in a
+week, and while the second was partly
+sold and partly in preparation, Messrs.
+Strahan's failure was announced, greatly
+to my surprise; my somewhat isolated
+position in the north country so far
+from London keeping me very imperfectly
+informed as to what was passing
+in the literary world.</p>
+
+<p>Reasonable, business-like people would
+ask, why did I not make an effort to
+rescue my little barque out of the general
+wreckage, and why did I not, remembering
+that Mr. Ruskin had with
+much kindness freely bestowed the
+copyright on me, save the second edition<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiii" id="Page_xiii">xiii</a></span>
+and arrange with another publisher to
+carry the work on? But I was failing
+at the time with the illness which was
+effectually cured only by a long sojourn
+amidst or very near to the ice and snow
+of the Alps. I was incapable of much
+exertion, and, in fact, did not much care.
+Besides which I am not a professed
+literary man, being chiefly interested in
+the work of my rural parish on the
+borders of the Lake District, and should
+not think it fair, or even possible, if
+I may use an equestrian metaphor, to
+attempt to ride two horses at once.</p>
+
+<p>So Mr. Ruskin's letters, etc., as
+edited by the present writer, came to
+be entirely laid by, though not forgotten
+by the hosts of Mr. Ruskin's friends,
+followers, and admirers, who regretted
+the suspension of so valuable a work
+and so rich in great thoughts, teachings,
+and suggestions.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiv" id="Page_xiv">xiv</a></span></p>
+
+<p>So things remained until August
+1895, when a new friend, Mr. Smart,
+gave me the pleasure of a visit, and
+we talked over the circumstances just
+narrated. Passing over several very
+pleasant meetings in London, let it be
+sufficient to mention that under the
+impulse of Mr. George Allen's encouragement,
+and cheered by the valuable
+assistance and co-operation of another
+friend, Mr. T. J. Wise, I agreed to
+carry forward this Third Edition with
+the full approbation and consent of
+Mr. Ruskin himself, though it should be
+said that on account of the state of
+his health, I have been unable to consult
+him on any of the details of the
+publication.</p>
+
+<p>But it will not be exactly the same
+volume. Mr. Allen and Mr. Wise,
+having gone over much of my correspondence
+with Mr. Ruskin, were good<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xv" id="Page_xv">xv</a></span>
+enough to express a desire that some
+of those letters addressed to myself
+as a friend should be embodied in
+the present volume, as being strongly
+illustrative of his views on the subjects
+dealt with in his more formal Letters
+to the Clergy. I may claim pardon
+for a feeling of great satisfaction with
+the circumstance that in the course
+of so long and so delicate a correspondence
+as is contained in this volume,
+never has a cloud overshadowed
+our paths in this matter, never has a
+cold blast from the east sent a shiver
+through my system, nor, I presume,
+his. For had Mr. Ruskin felt any
+resentment at anything I wrote, with
+his usual downright frankness he would
+not have been backward for an hour
+in expressing in vehement language
+what he felt. But from first to last
+my intercourse with that kind and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xvi" id="Page_xvi">xvi</a></span>
+eminently distinguished friend has been
+kept bright and happy by his unvarying
+serenity.</p>
+
+<p>The Letters from Clergy and Laity
+in this Third Edition occupy much less
+space than in the original one. It was
+Mr. Ruskin's wish that they should
+be subjected to some process of abridgment;
+besides which the allowing of
+space for the new feature of additional
+Ruskin Letters made a curtailment in
+another direction necessary. The plan
+which seemed to me the least discourteous
+to my numerous correspondents of
+that time has been to make a selection
+of passages from a certain number of
+the Letters.</p>
+
+<div class="smcapright">F. A. Malleson.</div>
+
+<p>
+<span class="smcapindent">The Vicarage</span>,
+<br />
+<span class="smcap">Broughton-in-Furness</span>,<br />
+
+<span class="smcapindent"><i>January 1896.</i></span>
+
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xvii" id="Page_xvii">xvii</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2><a name="CONTENTS" id="CONTENTS"></a>CONTENTS</h2>
+
+
+
+<div class="center">
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <span class="smcap">page</span>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">Introduction</span>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_v">v</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">Preface to the Third Edition</span>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_xi">xi</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">Mr. Ruskin's Letters</span>&mdash;
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ <span class="smcap">Letter</span>
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ I.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_3">3</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ II.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_5">5</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ III.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_8">8</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ IV.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_9">9</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ V.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_12">12</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ IV.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_15">15</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ VII.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_19">19</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ VIII.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_25">25</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ IX.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_32">32</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ X.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_36">36</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="center">
+ "
+ </td>
+ <td align="left">
+ XI.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_42">42</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">Essays and Comments. By the Editor</span>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_49">49</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">Extracts of Letters from Clergy and Laity</span>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_131">131</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">
+ Letters from Brantwood-on-the-Lake to the</span>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">Vicarage of Broughton-in-Furness</span>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_219">219</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ <span class="smcap">Epilogue by Mr. Ruskin</span>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_287">287</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td align="left" colspan="3">
+ APPENDIX
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ &nbsp;
+ </td>
+ <td align="right">
+ <a href="#Page_323">323</a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<p> <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">3</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="MR_RUSKINS_LETTERS" id="MR_RUSKINS_LETTERS"></a>MR. RUSKIN'S LETTERS</h2>
+
+
+<h3><a name="I" id="I"></a>I</h3>
+
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood, Coniston, Lancashire</span>,<br />
+<i>20th June</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;I could not
+at once answer your important letter:
+for, though I felt at once the impossibility
+of my venturing to address such
+an audience as you proposed, I am unwilling
+to fail in answering to any call
+relating to matters respecting which my
+feelings have been long in earnest, if
+in any wise it may be possible for me
+to be of service therein. My health&mdash;or
+want of it&mdash;now utterly forbids
+my engagement in any duty involving<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">4</a></span>
+excitement or acute intellectual effort;
+but I think, before the first Tuesday in
+August, I might be able to write one
+or two letters to yourself, referring to,
+and more or less completing, some passages
+already printed in Fors and elsewhere,
+which might, on your reading
+any portions you thought available, become
+matter of discussion during the
+meeting at some leisure time, after its
+own main purposes had been answered.</p>
+
+<p>At all events, I will think over what
+I should like, and be able, to represent
+to such a meeting, and only beg you
+not to think me insensible of the honour
+done me by your wish, and of the
+gravity of the trust reposed in me.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever most faithfully yours,<br />
+<span class = "signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="smcap"><br />The Rev. F. A. Malleson.</div>
+
+<p>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">5</a></span>
+</p>
+
+
+<h3><a name="II" id="II"></a>II</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood, Coniston</span>,<br />
+<i>23rd June</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;Walking, and
+talking, are now alike impossible to
+me;<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> my strength is gone for both;
+nor do I believe talking on such matters
+to be of the least use except to promote,
+between sensible people, kindly
+feeling and knowledge of each other's
+personal characters. I have every
+trust in <i>your</i> kindness and truth; nor
+do I fear being myself misunderstood
+by you; what I may be able to put
+into written form, so as to admit of
+being laid before your friends in council,
+must be set down without any question
+of personal feeling&mdash;as simply as a
+mathematical question or demonstration.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">6</a></span>The first exact question which it
+seems to me such an assembly may
+be earnestly called upon by laymen
+to solve, is surely axiomatic: the definition
+of themselves as a body, and
+of their business as such.</p>
+
+<p>Namely: as clergymen of the Church
+of England, do they consider themselves
+to be so called merely as the
+attached servants of a particular state?
+Do they, in their quality of guides, hold
+a position similar to that of the guides
+of Chamouni or Grindelwald, who being
+a numbered body of examined and
+trustworthy persons belonging to those
+several villages, have nevertheless no
+Chamounist or Grindelwaldist opinions
+on the subject of Alpine geography or
+glacier walking: but are prepared to
+put into practice a common and universal
+science of Locality and Athletics,
+founded on sure survey and successful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">7</a></span>
+practice? Are the clergymen of the
+Ecclesia of England thus simply the
+attached and salaried guides of England
+and the English, in the way,
+known of all good men, that leadeth
+unto life?&mdash;or are they, on the contrary,
+a body of men holding, or in
+any legal manner required, or compelled
+to hold, opinions on the subject&mdash;say,
+of the height of the Celestial
+Mountains, the crevasses which go down
+quickest to the pit, and other cognate
+points of science,&mdash;differing from, or
+even contrary to, the tenets of the
+guides of the Church of France, the
+Church of Italy, and other Christian
+countries?</p>
+
+<p>Is not this the first of all questions
+which a Clerical Council has to answer
+in open terms?</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class = "signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="footfirst">
+<a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_1_1">[1]</a>
+In answer to the proposal of discussing the
+subject during a mountain walk.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">8</a></span></p>
+
+
+<h3><a name="III" id="III"></a>III</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>6th July</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>My first letter contained a Layman's
+plea for a clear answer to the question,
+"What is a clergyman of the
+Church of England?" Supposing the
+answer to this first to be, that the
+clergy of the Church of England are
+teachers, not of the Gospel to England,
+but of the Gospel to all nations; and
+not of the Gospel of Luther, nor of
+the Gospel of Augustine, but of the
+Gospel of Christ,&mdash;then the Layman's
+second question would be:</p>
+
+<p>Can this Gospel of Christ be put
+into such plain words and short terms
+as that a plain man may understand
+it?&mdash;and, if so, would it not be, in a
+quite primal sense, desirable that it
+should be so, rather than left to be
+gathered out of Thirty-nine Articles,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">9</a></span>
+written by no means in clear English,
+and referring, for further explanation
+of exactly the most important point
+in the whole tenor of their teaching,<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a>
+to a "Homily of Justification,"<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> which
+is not generally in the possession, or
+even probably within the comprehension,
+of simple persons?</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever faithfully yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast1">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+<div class="footfirst">
+<a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_2_2">[2]</a> Art. xi.</div>
+
+<div class="footnote">
+<a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_3_3">[3]</a>
+Homily xi. of the Second Table.</div>
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="IV" id="IV"></a>IV</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>8th July</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I am so very glad that you approve
+of the letter plan, as it enables me to
+build up what I would fain try to say,
+of little stones, without lifting too much
+for my strength at once; and the sense
+of addressing a friend who understands<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">10</a></span>
+me and sympathizes with me prevents
+my being brought to a stand by
+continual need for apology, or fear of
+giving offence.</p>
+
+<p>But yet I do not quite see why you
+should feel my asking for a simple
+and comprehensible statement of the
+Christian Gospel as startling. Are
+you not bid to go into <i>all</i> the world
+and preach it to every creature? (I
+should myself think the clergyman most
+likely to do good who accepted the
+<span title="pasĂª tĂª ktisei" class="grk"><i>πάση τῆ κτίσει</i></span> so literally as at least to
+sympathize with St. Francis' sermon
+to the birds, and to feel that feeding
+either sheep or fowls, or unmuzzling
+the ox, or keeping the wrens alive in
+the snow, would be received by their
+Heavenly Feeder as the <i>perfect</i> fulfilment
+of His "Feed My sheep" in the
+higher sense.)</p>
+
+<p>That's all a parenthesis; for although<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">11</a></span>
+I should think that your good company
+would all agree that kindness to animals
+was a kind of preaching to them, and
+that hunting and vivisection were a
+kind of blasphemy to them, I want
+only to put the sterner question before
+your council, <i>how</i> this Gospel is to be
+preached either <span title="pantachou" class="grk">"<i>Ï€Î±Î½Ï„Î±Ï‡Ă´Ï…</i>"</span>
+or to <span title="panta ta ethnĂª" class="grk">"<i>πάντα
+τὰ ἔθνη</i></span>," if first its preachers have not
+determined quite clearly what it <i>is</i>?
+And might not such definition, acceptable
+to the entire body of the Church
+of Christ, be arrived at by merely explaining,
+in their completeness and life,
+the terms of the Lord's Prayer&mdash;the
+first words taught to children all over
+the Christian world?</p>
+
+<p>I will try to explain what I mean
+of its several articles, in following
+letters; and in answer to the question
+with which you close your last, I can
+only say that you are at perfect liberty<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">12</a></span>
+to use any, or all, or any parts of them,
+as you think good. Usually, when I
+am asked if letters of mine may be
+printed, I say: "Assuredly, provided
+only that you print them entire." But
+in your hands, I withdraw even this
+condition, and trust gladly to your
+judgment, remaining always</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Faithfully and affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast11">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>
+<span class="smcap"><br />The Rev. F. A. Malleson.</span><br />
+</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="V" id="V"></a>V</h3>
+
+<div title="pater hĂªmĂ´n ho en tois ouranois" class="centgrk">
+<i>Ï€Î¬Ï„ÎµÏ á¼¡Î¼á¿¶Î½ á½ á¼Î½ τοῖς οá½Ïανοῖς.<br />
+<br />
+Pater noster qui es in cælis.</i></div>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>10th July</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>My meaning, in saying that the
+Lord's Prayer might be made a foundation
+of Gospel-teaching, was not that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">13</a></span>
+it contained all that Christian ministers
+have to teach; but that it contains
+what all Christians are agreed upon as
+first to be taught; and that no good
+parish-working pastor in any district
+of the world but would be glad to take
+his part in making it clear and living
+to his congregation.</p>
+
+<p>And the first clause of it, of course
+rightly explained, gives us the ground
+of what is surely a mighty part of the
+Gospel&mdash;its "first and great commandment,"
+namely, that we have a Father
+whom we <i>can</i> love, and are required
+to love, and to desire to be with Him
+in Heaven, wherever that may be.</p>
+
+<p>And to declare that we have such a
+loving Father, whose mercy is over <i>all</i>
+His works, and whose will and law is
+so lovely and lovable that it is sweeter
+than honey, and more precious than
+gold, to those who can "taste" and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">14</a></span>
+"see" that the Lord is Good&mdash;this,
+surely, is a most pleasant and glorious
+good message and <i>spell</i> to bring
+to men&mdash;as distinguished from the evil
+message and accursed spell that Satan
+has brought to the nations of the world
+instead of it, that they have no Father,
+but only "a consuming fire" ready to
+devour them, unless they are delivered
+from its raging flame by some scheme
+of pardon for all, for which they are to
+be thankful, not to the Father, but to
+the Son.</p>
+
+<p>Supposing this first article of the true
+Gospel agreed to, how would the blessing
+that closes the epistles of that
+Gospel become intelligible and living,
+instead of dark and dead: "The grace
+of Christ, and the <i>love</i> of God, and the
+fellowship of the Holy Ghost,"&mdash;the
+most <i>tender</i> word being that used of
+the Father!</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">15</a></span></p>
+
+<h3><a name="VI" id="VI"></a>VI</h3>
+
+<div class="centgrk" title="hagiasthĂªtĂ´ to onoma sou">
+
+<i>á¼Î³Î¹Î±ÏƒÎ¸á½µÏ„ω τὸ ὄνομά σου.<br />
+<br />
+Sanctificetur nomen tuum.</i></div>
+
+
+<div class = "right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>12th July</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I wonder how many, even of those
+who honestly and attentively join in
+our Church services, attach any distinct
+idea to the second clause of the Lord's
+Prayer&mdash;the <i>first petition</i> of it&mdash;the first
+thing that they are ordered by Christ
+to seek of their Father?</p>
+
+<p>Am I unjust in thinking that most
+of them have little more notion on the
+matter than that God has forbidden
+"bad language," and wishes them to
+pray that everybody may be respectful
+to Him?</p>
+
+<p>Is it any otherwise with the Third
+Commandment? Do not most look on
+it merely in the light of the statute on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">16</a></span>
+swearing? and read the words "will not
+hold him guiltless" merely as a passionless
+intimation that however carelessly
+a man may let out a round oath,
+there really <i>is</i> something wrong in it?</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, can anything be
+more tremendous than the words
+themselves&mdash;double-negatived:</p>
+
+<div class="centgrk" title="ou gar mĂª katharisĂª ... kurios">
+<i>"Î¿á½ Î³á½°Ï Î¼á½´ καθαÏίσῃ ... κύÏιος</i>"?<br />
+</div>
+
+<p><a id="For_other"></a>For <i>other</i> sins there is washing;&mdash;for
+this&mdash;none! the seventh verse (Exod.
+xx.), in the Septuagint, marking the
+real power rather than the English,
+which (I suppose) is literal to the
+Hebrew.</p>
+
+<p>To my layman's mind, of practical
+needs in the present state of the Church,
+nothing is so immediate as that of
+explaining to the congregation the
+meaning of being gathered in His
+name, and having Him in the midst<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">17</a></span>
+of them; as, on the other hand, of
+being gathered in blasphemy of His
+name, and having the devil in the midst
+of them&mdash;presiding over the prayers
+which have become an abomination.</p>
+
+<p>For the entire body of the texts in
+the Gospel against hypocrisy are one
+and all nothing but the expansion of
+the threatening that closes the Third
+Commandment. For as "the name
+whereby He shall be called is <span class="smcap">The
+Lord our Righteousness</span>,"&mdash;so the
+taking that name in vain is the sum
+of "the deceivableness of <i>un</i>righteousness
+in them that perish."</p>
+
+<p>Without dwelling on the possibility&mdash;which
+I do not myself, however, for
+a moment doubt&mdash;of an honest clergyman's
+being able actually to prevent
+the entrance among his congregation
+of persons leading openly wicked lives,
+could any subject be more vital to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">18</a></span>
+purposes of your meetings than the
+difference between the present and the
+probable state of the Christian Church
+which would result, were it more the
+effort of zealous parish priests, instead
+of getting wicked <i>poor</i> people to <i>come</i>
+to church, to get wicked rich ones to
+stay out of it?</p>
+
+<p>Lest, in any discussion of such question,
+it might be, as it too often is,
+alleged that "the Lord looketh upon
+the heart," etc, let me be permitted to
+say&mdash;with as much positiveness as may
+express my deepest conviction&mdash;that,
+while indeed it is the Lord's business
+to look upon the heart, it is the pastor's
+to look upon the hands and the lips;
+and that the foulest oaths of the thief
+and the street-walker are, in the ears of
+God, sinless as the hawk's cry, or the
+gnat's murmur, compared to the responses,
+in the Church service, on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">19</a></span>
+lips of the usurer and the adulterer, who
+have destroyed, not their own souls
+only, but those of the outcast ones
+whom they have made their victims.</p>
+
+<p>It is for the meeting of Clergymen
+themselves&mdash;not for a layman addressing
+them&mdash;to ask further, how much
+the name of God may be taken in vain,
+and profaned instead of hallowed&mdash;<i>in</i>
+the pulpit, as well as under it.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="VII" id="VII"></a>VII</h3>
+
+<div class="centgrk" title="elthetĂ´ hĂª basileia sou"><i>á¼Î»Î¸Î­Ï„ω ἡ βασιλεία σου <br />
+<br />
+Adveniat regnum tuum.</i></div>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>14th July</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;Sincere thanks
+for both your letters and the proofs
+sent. Your comment and conducting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">20</a></span>
+link, when needed, will be of the greatest
+help and value, I am well assured,
+suggesting what you know will be the
+probable feeling of your hearers, and
+the point that will come into question.</p>
+
+<p>Yes, certainly, that "His" in the
+fourth line<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> was meant to imply that
+eternal presence of Christ; as in another
+passage,<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> referring to the Creation,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">21</a></span>
+"when His right hand strewed the
+snow on Lebanon, and smoothed the
+slopes of Calvary;" but in so far as
+we dwell on that truth, "Hast thou
+seen <i>Me</i>, Philip, and not the Father?"<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">22</a></span>we are not teaching the people what is
+specially the Gospel of <i>Christ</i> as having
+a distinct function, namely, to <i>serve</i> the
+Father, and do the Father's will. And
+in all His human relations to us, and
+commands to us, it is as the Son of Man,
+not as the "power of God and wisdom
+of God," that He acts and speaks. Not
+as the Power; for <i>He</i> must pray, like
+one of us. Not as the Wisdom; for
+He must not know "if it be possible"
+His prayer should be heard.</p>
+
+
+<p>And in what I want to say of the
+third clause of His prayer (<i>His</i>, not
+merely as His ordering, but His using),
+it is especially this comparison between
+<i>His</i> kingdom, and His Father's, that
+I want to see the disciples guarded
+against. I believe very few, even of
+the most earnest, using that petition,
+realize that it is the Father's&mdash;not the
+Son's&mdash;kingdom, that they pray may<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">23</a></span>
+come,&mdash;although the whole prayer is
+foundational on that fact: "<i>For</i> Thine is
+the kingdom, the power, and the glory."
+And I fancy that the mind of the most
+faithful Christian is quite led away from
+its proper hope, by dwelling on the
+reign&mdash;or the coming again&mdash;of Christ;
+which, indeed, they are to look for, and
+<i>watch</i> for, but not to pray for. Their
+prayer is to be for the greater kingdom
+to which He, risen and having all His
+enemies under His feet, is to surrender
+<i>His</i>, "that God may be All in All."</p>
+
+<p>And, though the greatest, it is that
+everlasting kingdom which the poorest
+of us can advance. We cannot hasten
+Christ's coming. "Of the day and the
+hour, knoweth no man." But the kingdom
+of God is as a grain of mustard-seed:&mdash;we
+can sow of it; it is as a
+foam-globe of leaven:&mdash;we can mingle
+it; and its glory and its joy are that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">24</a></span>
+even the birds of the air can lodge in
+the branches thereof.</p>
+
+<p>Forgive me for getting back to my
+sparrows; but truly in the present state
+of England, the fowls of the air are the
+only creatures, tormented and murdered
+as they are, that yet have here and
+there nests, and peace, and joy in the
+Holy Ghost. And it would be well if
+many of us, in reading that text, "The
+kingdom of God is <span class="smcap">not</span> meat and drink,"
+had even got so far as to the understanding
+that it is at least <i>as much</i>, and that
+until we had fed the hungry, there was
+no power in us to inspire the unhappy.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>I will write my feeling about the
+pieces of the Life of Christ<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> you have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">25</a></span>
+sent me in a private letter. I may say
+at once that I am sure it will do much
+good, and will be upright and intelligible,
+which how few religious writings are?</p>
+
+<div class="footfirst">
+<a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_4_4">[4]</a> In a proof sheet of a book of the Editor's at that
+time in the press.</div>
+
+<div class="footnote">
+<p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5">[5]</a>
+Referring to the closing sentence of the third
+paragraph of the fifth letter, which <i>seemed</i> to express
+what I felt could not be Mr. Ruskin's full meaning,
+I pointed out to him the following sentence in
+"Modern Painters:"&mdash;
+</p><p>
+"When, in the desert, Jesus was girding Himself
+for the work of life, angels of life came and ministered
+unto Him; now, in the fair world, when He is
+girding Himself for the work of death, the ministrants
+came to Him from the grave; but from the
+grave conquered. One from the tomb under Abarim,
+which <i>His</i> own hand had sealed long ago; the other
+from the rest which He had entered without seeing
+corruption."
+</p><p>
+On this I made a remark somewhat to the following
+effect: that I felt sure Mr. Ruskin regarded the
+loving work of the Father and of the Son as <i>equal</i>
+in the forgiveness of sins and redemption of mankind;
+that what is done by the Father is in reality
+done also by the Son; and that it is by a mere
+accommodation to human infirmity of understanding
+that the doctrine of the Trinity is revealed to us in
+language, inadequate indeed to convey divine truths,
+but still the only language possible; and I asked
+whether some such feeling was not present in his
+mind when he used the pronoun "His" in the above
+passage from "Modern Painters" of the Son, where
+it would be usually understood of the Father; and
+as a corollary, whether, in the letter, he does not
+himself fully recognise the fact of the redemption of
+the world by the loving self-sacrifice of the Son being
+in entire concurrence with the equally loving will of
+the Father. This, as well as I can recollect, is the
+origin of the passage in the second paragraph in this
+seventh letter.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Editor of Letters.</span></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6">[6]</a> "Yet hast thou not known Me, Philip? he that
+hath seen Me hath seen the Father" (John xiv. 9).&mdash;<span class="smcap">Editor.</span></p></div>
+
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7">[7]</a> The Life and Work of Jesus Christ. Ward and
+Lock.</p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="VIII" id="VIII"></a>VIII</h3>
+
+<div class="centgrk" title="genĂªthĂªtĂ´ to thelĂªma sou, hĂ´s en ouranĂ´, kai epi gĂªs">
+<i>γενηθήτω τὸ θέλημά σου, ὡς á¼Î½ οá½Ïανᾦ, καὶ á¼Ï€á½¶ γῆς.<br />
+<br />
+Fiat voluntas tua sicut in cœlo et in terra.</i></div>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>9th August</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I was reading the second chapter of
+Malachi this morning by chance, and
+wondering how many clergymen ever
+read it, and took to heart the "commandment
+for <i>them</i>."</p>
+
+<p>For they are always ready enough
+to call themselves priests (though they
+know themselves to be nothing of the
+sort), whenever there is any dignity to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">26</a></span>
+be got out of the title; but, whenever
+there is any good, hot scolding or unpleasant
+advice given them by the prophets,
+in that self-assumed character of
+theirs, they are as ready to quit it as ever
+Dionysus his lion-skin, when he finds
+the character of Herakles inconvenient.</p>
+
+<p>"Ye have wearied the Lord with your
+words;" (yes, and some of His people
+too, in your time), "yet ye say, Wherein
+have we wearied Him? When ye say,
+Every one that doeth evil is good in
+the sight of the Lord, and He delighteth
+in them; or, Where is the God
+of judgment?"</p>
+
+<p>How many, again and again I wonder,
+of the lively young ecclesiastics supplied
+to the increasing demand of our west
+ends of flourishing Cities of the Plain,
+ever consider what sort of sin it is for
+which God (unless they lay it to heart)
+will "curse their blessings, and spread<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">27</a></span>
+dung upon their faces;" or have understood,
+even in the dimmest manner,
+what part <i>they</i> had taken, and were
+taking, in "corrupting the covenant of
+the Lord with Levi, and causing many
+to stumble at the Law."</p>
+
+<p>Perhaps the most subtle and unconscious
+way in which the religious
+teachers upon whom the ends of the
+world are come, have done this, is in
+never telling their people the meaning
+of the clause in the Lord's Prayer,
+which, of all others, their most earnest
+hearers have oftenest on their lips:
+"Thy will be done." They allow their
+people to use it as if their Father's will
+were always to kill their babies, or do
+something unpleasant to them; and
+following comfort and wealth, instead
+of explaining to them that the first and
+intensest article of their Father's will
+was their own sanctification; and that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">28</a></span>
+the one only path to national prosperity
+and to domestic peace, was to understand
+what the will of the Lord was,
+and to do all they could to get it done.
+Whereas one would think, by the tone
+of the eagerest preachers nowadays,
+that they held their blessed office to
+be that, not of showing men how to do
+their Father's will on earth, but how to
+get to heaven without doing any of it
+either here or there!</p>
+
+<p>I say, especially, the most eager
+preachers; for nearly the whole Missionary
+body (with the hottest Evangelistic
+sect of the English Church) is
+at this moment composed of men who
+think the Gospel they are to carry to
+mend the world with, forsooth, is that,
+"If any man sin, he hath an Advocate
+with the Father;" while I have never
+yet, in my own experience, met either
+with a Missionary or a Town Bishop<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">29</a></span>
+who so much as professed himself "to
+understand what the will of the Lord"
+was, far less to teach anybody else to
+do it; and for fifty preachers, yes, and
+fifty hundreds whom I have heard proclaiming
+the Mediator of the New
+Testament, that "they which were
+called might receive the promise of
+eternal inheritance," I have never yet
+heard so much as <i>one</i> heartily proclaiming
+against all those "deceivers with
+vain words" (Eph. v. 6), that "no
+covetous person which is an idolater,
+hath <i>any</i> inheritance in the kingdom
+of Christ, or of God;" and on myself
+personally and publicly challenging the
+Bishops of England generally, and by
+name the Bishop of Manchester, to say
+whether usury was, or was not, according
+to the will of God, I have received
+no answer from any one of them.
+<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a>
+<a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a></p>
+
+
+
+
+<div class="right"><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">30</a></span>
+<i>13th August.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>I have allowed myself, in the beginning
+of this letter, to dwell on the
+equivocal use of the word "Priest" in
+the English Church (see "Christopher
+Harvey," Grosart's edition, p. 38),
+because the assumption of the mediatorial,
+in defect of the pastoral, office
+by the clergy fulfils itself, naturally and
+always, in their pretending to absolve
+the sinner from his punishment, instead
+of purging him from his sin; and practically,
+in their general patronage and
+encouragement of all the iniquity of the
+world, by steadily preaching away the
+penalties of it. So that the great cities
+of the earth, which ought to be the
+places set on its hills, with the Temple
+of the Lord in the midst of them, to
+which the tribes should go up,&mdash;centres
+to the Kingdoms and Provinces of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">31</a></span>
+Honour, Virtue, and the Knowledge of
+the law of God,&mdash;have become, instead,
+loathsome centres of fornication and
+covetousness&mdash;the smoke of their sin
+going up into the face of heaven like
+the furnace of Sodom, and the pollution
+of it rotting and raging through the
+bones and the souls of the peasant
+people round them, as if they were each
+a volcano whose ashes broke out in
+blains upon man and upon beast.</p>
+
+<p>And in the midst of them, their
+freshly-set-up steeples ring the crowd to
+a weekly prayer that the rest of their
+lives may be pure and holy, while they
+have not the slightest intention of purifying,
+sanctifying, or changing their
+lives in any the smallest particular;
+and their clergy gather, each into himself,
+the curious dual power, and Janus-faced
+majesty in mischief, of the
+prophet that prophesies falsely, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">32</a></span>
+the priest that bears rule by his
+means.</p>
+
+<p>And the people love to have it so.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>12th August</i>.<br />
+</div>
+
+<p>I am very glad of your little note
+from Brighton. I thought it needless
+to send the two letters there, which you
+will find at home; and they pretty
+nearly end all <i>I</i> want to say; for the
+remaining clauses of the prayer touch
+on things too high for me. But I will
+send you one concluding letter about
+them.</p>
+
+<div class="footfirst"><p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_8_8">[8]</a> Fors Clavigera, Letter lxxxii., p. 323.</p></div>
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="IX" id="IX"></a>IX</h3>
+
+<div class="centgrk" title="ton arton hĂªmĂ´n ton epiousion dos hĂªmin sĂªmeron">
+<i>τὸν ἄÏτον ἡμῶν τὸν á¼Ï€Î¹Î¿á½»ÏƒÎ¹Î¿Î½ δὸς ἡμῖν σήμεÏον.<br />
+<br />
+Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie.</i>
+</div>
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>19th August</i>.
+</div>
+
+<p>I retained the foregoing letter by me
+till now, lest you should think it written<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">33</a></span>
+in any haste or petulance: but it is
+every word of it deliberate, though expressing
+the bitterness of twenty years
+of vain sorrow and pleading concerning
+these things. Nor am I able to write,
+otherwise, anything of the next following
+clause of the prayer;&mdash;for no words
+could be burning enough to tell the
+evils which have come on the world
+from men's using it thoughtlessly and
+blasphemously, praying God to give
+them what they are deliberately resolved
+to steal. For all true Christianity
+is known&mdash;as its Master was&mdash;in
+breaking of bread, and all false
+Christianity in stealing it.</p>
+
+<p>Let the clergyman only apply&mdash;with
+impartial and level sweep&mdash;to his congregation
+the great pastoral order:
+"The man that will not work, neither
+should he eat;" and be resolute in
+requiring each member of his flock to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">34</a></span>
+tell him <i>what</i>&mdash;day by day&mdash;they do to
+earn their dinners;&mdash;and he will find an
+entirely new view of life and its sacraments
+open upon him and them.</p>
+
+<p>For the man who is not&mdash;day by
+day&mdash;doing work which will earn his
+dinner, must be stealing his dinner;
+and the actual fact is, that the great
+mass of men calling themselves Christians
+do actually live by robbing the
+poor of their bread, and by no other
+trade whatsoever; and the simple examination
+of the mode of the produce
+and consumption of European food&mdash;who
+digs for it, and who eats it&mdash;will
+prove that to any honest human soul.</p>
+
+<p>Nor is it possible for any Christian
+Church to exist but in pollutions and
+hypocrisies beyond all words, until the
+virtues of a life moderate in its self-indulgence,
+and wide in its offices
+of temporal ministry to the poor, are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">35</a></span>
+insisted on as the normal conditions
+in which, only, the prayer to God for
+the harvest of the earth is other than
+blasphemy.</p>
+
+<p>In the second place. Since in the
+parable in Luke, the bread asked for
+is shown to be also, and chiefly, the
+Holy Spirit (Luke xi. 13), and the
+prayer, "Give us each day our daily
+bread" is, in its fulness, the disciples'
+"Lord, evermore give us <i>this</i> bread,"&mdash;the
+clergyman's question to his whole
+flock, primarily literal, "Children, have
+ye here any meat?" must ultimately
+be always the greater spiritual one:
+"Children, have ye here any Holy
+Spirit?" or, "Have ye not heard yet
+whether there <i>be</i> any? and, instead of
+a Holy Ghost the Lord and Giver of
+Life, do you only believe in an unholy
+mammon, Lord and Giver of Death?"</p>
+
+<p>The opposition between the two<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">36</a></span>
+Lords has been, and will be as long as
+the world lasts, absolute, irreconcilable,
+mortal; and the clergyman's first message
+to his people of this day is&mdash;if
+he be faithful&mdash;"Choose ye this day,
+whom ye will serve."</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever faithfully yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast1">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="X" id="X"></a>X</h3>
+
+<div class="centgrk" title="kai aphes hĂªmin ta opheilĂªmata hĂªmĂ´n, hĂ´s kai
+hĂªmeis aphiemen tois opheiletais hĂªmĂ´n">
+<i>καὶ ἄφες ἡμῖν τὰ ὀφειλήματα ἡμῶν, ὡς καὶ<br />
+ἡμεῖς ἀφίεμεν τοῖς ὀφειλέταις ἡμῶν<br />
+<br />
+Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus<br />
+debitoribus nostris.</i>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>3rd September</i>.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;I have been
+very long before trying to say so much
+as a word about the sixth clause of the
+Pater; for whenever I began thinking
+of it, I was stopped by the sorrowful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">37</a></span>
+sense of the hopeless task you poor
+clergymen had, nowadays, in recommending
+and teaching people to love
+their enemies, when their whole energies
+were already devoted to swindling their
+friends.</p>
+
+<p>But, in any days, past or now, the
+clause is one of such difficulty, that,
+to understand it, means almost to
+know the love of God which passeth
+knowledge.</p>
+
+<p>But, at all events, it is surely the pastor's
+duty to prevent his flock from <i>mis</i>-understanding
+it; and above all things
+to keep them from supposing that God's
+forgiveness is to be had simply for the
+asking, by those who "wilfully sin after
+they have received the knowledge of
+the truth."</p>
+
+<p>There is one very simple lesson, also,
+needed especially by people in circumstances
+of happy life, which I have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">38</a></span>
+never heard fully enforced from the
+pulpit, and which is usually the more
+lost sight of, because the fine and inaccurate
+word "trespasses" is so often
+used instead of the simple and accurate
+one, "debts." Among people well
+educated and happily circumstanced, it
+may easily chance that long periods of
+their lives pass without any such conscious
+sin as could, on any discovery
+or memory of it, make them cry out,
+in truth and in pain, "I have sinned
+against the Lord." But scarcely an
+hour of their happy days can pass over
+them without leaving&mdash;were their hearts
+open&mdash;some evidence written there that
+they have "left undone the things that
+they ought to have done," and giving
+them bitterer and heavier cause to cry
+and cry again&mdash;for ever, in the pure
+words of their Master's prayer, "Dimitte
+nobis <i>debita</i> nostra."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">39</a></span></p>
+
+<p>In connection with the more accurate
+translation of "debts," rather than "trespasses,"
+it would surely be well to keep
+constantly in the mind of complacent
+and inoffensive congregations, that in
+Christ's own prophecy of the manner
+of the last judgment, the condemnation
+is pronounced only on the sins of omission:
+"I was hungry, and ye gave Me
+no meat."</p>
+
+<p>But, whatever the manner of sin, by
+offence or defect, which the preacher
+fears in his people, surely he has of late
+been wholly remiss in compelling their
+definite recognition of it, in its several
+and personal particulars. Nothing in the
+various inconsistency of human nature
+is more grotesque than its willingness
+to be taxed with any quantity of sins in
+the gross, and its resentment at the
+insinuation of having committed the
+smallest parcel of them in detail. And<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">40</a></span>
+the English Liturgy, evidently drawn
+up with the amiable intention of making
+religion as pleasant as possible to a
+people desirous of saving their souls
+with no great degree of personal inconvenience,
+is perhaps in no point more
+unwholesomely lenient than in its concession
+to the popular conviction that
+we may obtain the present advantage,
+and escape the future punishment, of
+any sort of iniquity, by dexterously concealing
+the manner of it from man, and
+triumphantly confessing the quantity of
+it to God.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, whatever the advantages and
+decencies of a form of prayer, and how
+wide soever the scope given to its collected
+passages, it cannot be at one and
+the same time fitted for the use of a
+body of well-taught and experienced
+Christians, such as should join the services
+of a Church nineteen centuries old,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">41</a></span>&mdash;and
+adapted to the needs of the timid
+sinner who has that day first entered
+its porch, or of the remorseful publican
+who has only recently become sensible
+of his call to a pew.</p>
+
+<p>And surely our clergy need not be
+surprised at the daily increasing distrust
+in the public mind of the efficacy of
+Prayer, after having so long insisted on
+their offering supplication, <i>at least</i> every
+Sunday morning at eleven o'clock, that
+the rest of their lives hereafter might be
+pure and holy, leaving them conscious
+all the while that they would be similarly
+required to inform the Lord next
+week, at the same hour, that "there was
+no health in them"!</p>
+
+<p>Among the much rebuked follies and
+abuses of so-called "Ritualism," none
+that I have heard of are indeed so
+dangerously and darkly "Ritual" as
+this piece of authorized mockery of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">42</a></span>
+most solemn act of human life, and only
+entrance of eternal life&mdash;Repentance.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Believe me, dear Mr. Malleson,<br />
+
+<div class="signature">Ever faithfully and respectfully
+
+yours,<br />
+
+<span class="signlast12">J. Ruskin.</span></div>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="XI" id="XI"></a>XI</h3>
+
+<div class="centgrk" title="kai mĂª eisenegkĂªs hĂªmas eis peirasmon,
+alla rhusai hĂªmas apo tou ponĂªrou;
+hoti sou estin hĂª basileia kai hĂª dunamis kai hĂª doxa eis tous aiĂ´nas; amĂªn"><i>καὶ μὴ εἰσενέγκης ἡμᾶς εἰς πειÏασμὸν ἀλλὰ
+ῥῦσαι ἡμᾶς ἀπὸ τοῦ πονηÏοῦ; <br />ὅτι σοῦ
+á¼ÏƒÏ„ιν ἡ βασιλεία καὶ ἡ δύναμις καὶ ἡ δόξα
+εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας; ἀμὴν.<br />
+<br />
+Et ne nos inducas in tentationem; sed libera
+nos a malo;<br /> Quia tuum est regmum,
+potentia, et gloria in sæcula sæculorum.
+Amen.</i></div>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>14th September</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;The gentle
+words in your last letter referring to the
+difference between yourself and me in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">43</a></span>
+the degree of hope with which you could
+regard what could not but appear to the
+general mind Utopian in designs for the
+action of the Christian Church, surely
+might best be answered by appeal to
+the consistent tone of the prayer we
+have been examining.</p>
+
+<p>Is not every one of its petitions for a
+perfect state? and is not this last clause
+of it, of which we are to think to-day&mdash;if
+fully understood&mdash;a petition not only
+for the restoration of Paradise, but of
+Paradise in which there shall be no
+deadly fruit, or, at least, no tempter to
+praise it? And may we not admit that
+it is probably only for want of the
+earnest use of this last petition, that not
+only the preceding ones have become
+formal with us, but that the private and
+simply restricted prayer for the little
+things we each severally desire, has become
+by some Christians dreaded and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">44</a></span>
+unused, and by others used faithlessly,
+and therefore with disappointment?</p>
+
+<p>And is it not for want of this special
+directness and simplicity of petition,
+and of the sense of its acceptance, that
+the whole nature of prayer has been
+doubted in our hearts, and disgraced
+by our lips; that we are afraid to
+ask God's blessing on the earth, when
+the scientific people tell us He has
+made previous arrangements to curse
+it; and that, instead of obeying, without
+fear or debate, the plain order,
+"Ask, and ye shall receive, that your
+joy may be full," we sorrowfully sink
+back into the apology for prayer, that
+"it is a wholesome exercise, even when
+fruitless," and that we ought piously
+always to suppose that the text really
+means no more than "Ask, and ye
+shall <i>not</i> receive, that your joy may
+be <i>empty</i>"?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">45</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Supposing we were first all of us
+quite sure that we <i>had</i> prayed, honestly,
+the prayer against temptation, and that
+we would thankfully be refused anything
+we had set our hearts upon, if
+indeed God saw that it would lead us
+into evil, might we not have confidence
+afterwards that He in whose hand the
+King's heart is, as the rivers of water,
+would turn our tiny little hearts also
+in the way that they should go, and
+that <i>then</i> the special prayer for the
+joys He taught them to seek, would
+be answered to the last syllable, and
+to overflowing?</p>
+
+<p>It is surely scarcely necessary to say,
+farther, what the holy teachers of all
+nations have invariably concurred in
+showing,&mdash;that faithful prayer implies
+always correlative exertion; and that
+no man can ask honestly or hopefully
+to be delivered from temptation, unless<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">46</a></span>
+he has himself honestly and firmly determined
+to do the best he can to keep
+out of it. But, in modern days, the
+first aim of all Christian parents is to
+place their children in circumstances
+where the temptations (which they are
+apt to call "opportunities") may be as
+great and as many as possible; where
+the sight and promise of "all these
+things" in Satan's gift may be brilliantly
+near; and where the act of "falling
+down to worship me" may be partly
+concealed by the shelter, and partly
+excused, as involuntary, by the pressure,
+of the concurrent crowd.</p>
+
+<p>In what respect the kingdoms of the
+world, and the glory of <i>them</i>, differ
+from the Kingdom, the Power, and the
+Glory, which are God's for ever, is
+seldom, as far as I have heard, intelligibly
+explained from the pulpit; and
+still less the irreconcilable hostility<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">47</a></span>
+between the two royalties and realms
+asserted in its sternness of decision.</p>
+
+<p>Whether it be indeed Utopian to
+believe that the kingdom we are taught
+to pray for <i>may</i> come&mdash;verily come&mdash;for
+the asking, it is surely not for man
+to judge; but it is at least at his choice
+to resolve that he will no longer render
+obedience, nor ascribe glory and power,
+to the Devil. If he cannot find strength
+in himself to advance towards Heaven,
+he may at least say to the power of
+Hell, "Get thee behind me;" and
+staying himself on the testimony of
+Him who saith, "Surely I come
+quickly," ratify his happy prayer with
+the faithful "Amen, even so, come,
+Lord Jesus."</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever, my dear friend,
+<div class="signature">
+Believe me affectionately
+<div class="signature">
+and gratefully yours,
+<br />
+<span class="signlast1">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49"></a></span></p>
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#CONTENTS">ToC</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="ESSAYS_AND_COMMENTS" id="ESSAYS_AND_COMMENTS"></a>ESSAYS AND COMMENTS</h2>
+
+<h6>ON THE</h6>
+
+<h2>FOREGOING LETTERS</h2>
+
+<h4>BY THE EDITOR</h4>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">51</a></span>
+</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="ESSAYS_AND_COMMENTS_BEGIN" id="ESSAYS_AND_COMMENTS_BEGIN"></a>ESSAYS AND COMMENTS</h3>
+
+
+<p>Feeling deeply, and anxiously, the greatness
+of the responsibility laid upon me to act, as it
+were, the part of an envoy between so eminent
+a teacher as Mr. Ruskin and my brethren in
+the Ministry, I have thought that it might not
+be taken amiss if I prefaced my account of
+the origin of the series of letters placed in
+my hands for publication (see <a href="#IV">Letter 8th July,
+1879</a>)<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> with just a mere allusion to one written
+to me four years ago.</p>
+
+
+<p>One or two imperfect conversations, leading
+up to the subject of the Resurrection, which
+had been broken off by accidental circumstances,
+together with the letter alluded to,
+had stimulated in me a feeling of something
+more than curiosity&mdash;rather one of anxious
+interest&mdash;to learn more of Mr. Ruskin's
+views<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">52</a></span>
+upon matters which are at the present day
+giving rise to a good deal of agitated discussion
+among intellectual men.</p>
+
+<p>I am thankful to be able to avow that, for
+my own part, I am a firm and conscientious,
+not a thoughtless and passive, believer in the
+doctrines of the Church of Christ as held by
+the majority of serious-minded religious men
+in the Established Church. Mr. Ruskin was
+mistaken in his much too ready assumption
+that I (simply because I am a clergyman) am
+a believer on compulsion; that for the peace
+of my soul I have only to thank religious
+anæsthetics, and that I ever preach against
+the wickedness of involuntary doubt. God
+forbid that I should ever take on myself to
+denounce as wilful sin any scruples of conscience
+which owe their origin to honest
+inquiries after truth. I trust that he knows
+me better now.</p>
+
+<p>Feeling thus decided and certain as to the
+ground I stand upon, and earnestly desirous
+on every account to investigate the nature of
+Mr. Ruskin's doubts, whatever they might be,
+in a most fraternal spirit, as a kindly-favoured
+friend and neighbour (for, in our lake and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">53</a></span>
+mountain district, an interval of a dozen
+miles does not destroy neighbourhood between
+spirits with any degree of kinship), I
+sought for a more lengthened conversation,
+and obtained the opportunity without difficulty.
+The occasion was found in a very
+delightful summer afternoon on the lake, and
+up the sides of the Old Man of Coniston, to
+view a group of remarkable rocks by the
+desolate, storm-beaten crags of Goat's Water,<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a>
+that saddest and loneliest of mountain tarns,
+which lies in the deep hollow between the
+mountain and its opposing buttress, the Dow
+Crags. This most interesting ramble in the
+undivided company of one so highly and so
+deservedly valued in the world of letters and
+of art and higher matters yet, served to my
+mind for more purposes than one, while we
+wandered amidst impressive scenes, passing
+from the sweet and gentle peaceful loveliness
+of the bright green vale of Coniston
+and its charming lake to the bleak desolation,
+the terrible sublimity of the mountain
+tarn barriered in by its stupendous crags,
+amongst which lay those singular-looking,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">54</a></span>
+weather-beaten, and lightning-riven rocks
+which were the more immediate object of
+our visit.</p>
+
+
+<p>But to myself the chief and happiest result
+of our conversation was the firm conviction
+that neither the censorious and unthinking
+world, nor perhaps even Mr. Ruskin himself,
+knows how deeply and truly a Christian man,
+in the widest sense of the word, Mr. Ruskin
+is. It is neither the time nor the place, nor
+indeed would it be consistent with propriety,
+to analyze before others the convictions formed
+on that memorable summer afternoon. It must
+suffice for the present to say that the opinions
+then formed laid the foundation of a friendship
+on a happier basis than that which
+had heretofore been permitted me, and prepared
+my way to enter with confidence upon
+the plan of which the present volume is the
+fruit.</p>
+
+<p>Last June, in the course of a short visit to
+Brantwood, I proposed to Mr. Ruskin to come
+to address the members of a Northern Clerical
+Society, a body of some seventy or eighty
+clergy, who have done me the honour to appoint
+me their honorary secretary, now for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">55</a></span>
+about nine years, since its foundation. On
+the ground of impaired health, the legacy left
+behind it by the serious illness which had,
+two years before, threatened even his life,
+Mr. Ruskin excused himself from appearing
+in person before our Society; but proposed
+instead to write letters to me which might
+serve as a basis for discussion amongst us.</p>
+
+<p><a href="#I">Letter I.</a> will explain the origin of the series
+that come after.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#II">Letter II</a></span></p>
+<h4>On Letter II</h4>
+
+
+<p>The question laid down in this letter, cleared
+of all metaphorical ornament, is, as is perfectly
+natural and instinctive with Mr. Ruskin, one
+which goes down to the foundation of things&mdash;here,
+the character and mission of the Christian
+ministry. Are we (Mr. Ruskin implies, Are
+we <i>not</i>?) bound to believe and to teach after
+certain formulæ, which, being many of them
+peculiar to ourselves, separate us from the
+national Churches of France and Italy? Are
+we free, or are we bound? Or do we enjoy
+a reasonable amount of liberty and no more?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">56</a></span>
+On the platform we occupy do we allow none
+but English Churchmen to stand? Must we
+keep all other Christians at arm's length? Do
+the conditions attached to the emoluments we
+receive prohibit us from holding or teaching
+any other opinions than those we have subscribed
+to?</p>
+
+<p>It is a question not to be approached without
+a tremor. But no abstract answer can well
+be given. Human nature replies for itself in
+the spectacle of the clergy of the Church of
+England divided and subdivided; here deeply
+sundered, there of different complexions amicably
+blending together, holding every variety
+of opinion which the Church allows or disallows
+within her borders. Human nature
+absolutely refuses to be shackled in its positive
+beliefs. Authority may try, or even appear
+to perform, the feat of fettering thought and
+making men march in step to one common
+end in orderly ranks; but she has invariably
+at last to confess her impotence.<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
+
+
+
+<p>The ministers of the Church cannot safely be
+set free by Act of Parliament to teach whatever<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">57</a></span>
+seems good to each. Some respect must be
+shown to congregations too. If the clergy
+claim on their side the right of independent
+thought, which they are quite justified in
+doing, the congregations on their side have
+a much greater right to a consistent teaching,
+which shall not distract their minds with
+strange and unwonted forms of Christianity.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin, as he often does, is going <i>too
+deep</i>. He asks for that which we shall never
+see in this world,&mdash;the simple, pure religion of
+the Bible to be taught in all singleness and
+simplicity of mind by men whose only commission
+is held from God, by or without the
+channel of human authority, to show men,
+women, and children the way "to the summit
+of the celestial mountains," and to set an awful
+warning by conspicuous beacons against the
+"crevasses which go down quickest to the
+pit." But who shall say that he is wrong?
+Nay, rather, it is we that are wrong in resting
+satisfied with our low views of things, while
+Ruskin soars above our heads.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">58</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#III">Letter III</a></span></p>
+
+<h4>On Letter III</h4>
+
+<p>I would preface the few remarks I wish to
+make upon this letter by an extract from a
+letter just received from a dear good friend:</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>"I have already read these deeply interesting
+letters five times. They are like 'the
+foam-globes of leaven.' I must say they have
+exercised my mind very much. Things in
+them which at first seem rather startling,
+prove on closer examination to be full of deep
+truth. The suggestions in them lead to 'great
+searchings of heart.' There is much with
+which I entirely agree; much over which to
+ponder. What an insight into human nature
+is shown in the remark that though we are
+so ready to call ourselves 'miserable sinners'
+we resent being accused of any special fault!</p>
+
+<div class="rightsign">
+"S. B."
+</div>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>By the side of this, it will be instructive,
+though strange, if I place an extract from
+another note from one whom I have long
+known and highly esteemed; and it will be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">59</a></span>
+seen what a singular "discerner of hearts"
+and "divider of spirits" is this series of
+letters:&mdash;</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>"If they are really meant <i>au sérieux</i>, I could
+not express any opinion of them without implying
+a reflection upon you also, as you seem
+to endorse them so fully. I prefer, therefore,
+to say merely that, as a whole, they offer
+one of the most remarkable instances I ever
+met with of the old adage, 'Ne sutor ultra
+crepidam.'"<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p></blockquote>
+
+
+
+<p>In spite of this I retain all my old high
+opinion of the writer of these lines, and feel convinced
+that he will soon think very differently.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">60</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Yes, it is as my first correspondent has said,
+"Things which at first seem startling, on
+examination prove to be full of deep truth."
+In the short compass of this <a href="#III">Letter III.</a> lies enfolded
+a vast question, which, in the midst of
+the friction and conflict of ages of strife, has
+been shuffled away into odd corners, to be
+brought out into life only now and then, when
+a man is born into the world who sees what
+few will even glance at, and who will say out
+that which ought to be spoken, though but
+few may listen. What is the question which
+is put here so tersely and so pointedly? It is
+this, which I am only putting a little differently,
+not with the most distant idea of improving
+upon Mr. Ruskin's felicitous touches; but,
+because expressed in twofold fashion, what
+has escaped one may strike another in a
+different form.</p>
+
+<p>Is a clergyman of the Church of England a
+teacher of the doctrine and practice and discipline
+of the Church of England within her
+limits only, narrow as they are, when compared
+with Christendom? or is there not
+rather a wider, more comprehensive Church
+yet&mdash;that of Christ upon earth&mdash;which he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">61</a></span>
+must serve, which he must preach, in forgetfulness
+of the limited boundaries within which
+by his education and his ordination vows he
+is <i>apparently</i> bound to remain? Is there not
+enough of Christianity common to all the
+Christian nations upon earth, and which ought
+to be made the subject of teaching to the
+ignorant and the castaway? Is it quite a
+right thing that the natives of Madagascar, for
+instance, should see parties of missionaries
+arriving amongst them: one, in all the gorgeous
+trappings and with all the elaborate ritual
+of Rome; another in rusty black coats and
+hats and dirty white neckties, repudiating all
+but the very barest necessary ceremonial; a
+third, possibly disunited in itself, coming as
+High Churchmen or Low Churchmen, with
+differing peculiarities? Is this an edifying spectacle
+for the Malagasy? And can the Gospel
+be preached as effectually in this highly diversified
+fashion as it would be with the simplicity
+of a reasonable and just sufficiently elastic
+uniformity?</p>
+
+<p>Coming before many people of infinite
+diversity of mind, it cannot be doubted that
+Christianity must necessarily take a variety of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">62</a></span>
+forms, to suit different intelligences, and adapt
+itself to differing situations. But in all this
+large variety of forms of religion, ranging
+from mere paganism at one end, just a little
+unavoidably altered by the contact of Christianity,
+and at the other extremity a pure
+religion, but refined and intellectual, I do not
+see exactly what is the form of Christianity
+which the Church of England is to preach to
+the masses at home and abroad. As long as
+England takes the Gospel to the ignorant in
+such infinitely diversified forms, it is as if an
+incapable general were to divide his forces
+preparatory to an assault upon a compact and
+well-defended stronghold.</p>
+
+<p>It is enough to make one weep with vexation
+and humiliation to see what sort of religion
+would be presented to the world if some
+who claim to have all truth on their side could
+have their own way. I say to have the truth
+on their side,&mdash;which is a very different thing
+from being on the side of truth. There is
+even a new religion&mdash;for it is certainly not the
+old&mdash;growing popular with "thinkers," who
+write and read in the three great half-crown
+monthlies, which is evolved in the most curious<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">63</a></span>
+variety out of their inner consciousness by
+religion-makers, whose fertile brains are the
+only soil that can bring forth such productions.
+What is the vast uneducated world to do with
+these extraordinary forms of religion which
+are as many-sided and many-faced as their
+inventors?</p>
+
+<p>Now Mr. Ruskin and many others see this
+state of things with pity and compassion, and
+ask, "Cannot this Gospel of Christ be put
+into such plain words and short terms as that
+a plain man may understand it?" Why is
+there no such easy summary provided by
+authority to teach the poor and simple? The
+Apostles' Creed is good for its own end and
+purpose, but it requires great expansion to
+be made to include Gospel teaching, and
+it contains nothing practical. The Thirty-nine
+Articles are not even intended (as Mr.
+Ruskin by some oversight seems to think
+they are) to be a summary of the Gospel.
+We have no concise and plain, clear and
+intelligible form of sound words to answer
+this most important end. The Church Catechism,
+from old associations, belongs to
+childhood.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">64</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Every reasonable person must agree with
+Mr. Ruskin, that there could be no harm, but
+much good, in Christians making a little less
+of their Churchmanship, and a little more of
+their broad Christianity.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#IV">Letter IV</a></span></p>
+
+<h4>On Letter IV</h4>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin pleads in this letter with touching
+eloquence for the guidance of the law of
+love, that irresistible law, one effect of which
+is to give to the highest probability the force
+of a sufficient certainty, and establishes in
+the man the mental habit best described as
+<i>certitude</i>.</p>
+
+<p>In Cardinal Newman's "History of My
+Religious Opinions," p. 18, he quotes some
+beautiful passages from Keble's conversations
+with himself (disagreeing with him all the
+time), in which he had quoted, "I will guide
+thee <i>with mine eye</i>" (Psalm xxxii. 8), as the
+expression of the gentle suasive power that
+directs the steps of the child and friend of
+God, as distinguished from "the bit and bridle"
+laid upon horse and mule, who represent<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">65</a></span>
+unwilling slaves recognising no law but that
+of force or coercion. It is an Eye whose gaze
+is ever fixed on us, the "Eye of God's Word,"
+"like that of a portrait uniformly fixed on us,
+turn where we will."<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> And Keble is right so
+far as concerns the true children and friends
+of God, subject, as their highest control, to
+the law of love. Pure and exalted minds ever
+strain for, and yearn after, a general and outward
+manifestation of the witness that man
+is "the image and glory of God" (1 Cor.
+xi. 7).</p>
+
+
+
+<p>Unhappily, we are not so constituted by
+nature. The inroads and ravages of sin are
+but too evident, as well in those upon whom
+episcopal hands have been laid, as in the ranks
+of the laity. Are not wilfulness and pride of
+intellect and glorification of self ever exercising
+such a power in the earth, that checks
+and restraints are found absolutely necessary
+to curb and control the determination of many
+of the ministers of the Church not only to
+<i>think</i> as seems good to them (which they have
+a perfect right to do), but openly to <i>teach and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">66</a></span>
+to preach</i> whatever doctrines they may have
+conceived in their own minds, or have learnt
+from others, contrary to the received doctrines
+of the Church of England; which they
+have no right to do as long as they remain
+ministers of the Church whose doctrines they
+impugn?</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin correctly assumes that the terms
+of the Lord's Prayer, being in the very words
+of Christ, do contain a body of Divine doctrine;
+and they would be the fittest to adopt as a
+standard of Christian teaching, <i>if</i> only all men
+were as candid, sincere, and straightforward
+as himself. But because there is no certainty
+that any large and preponderating body of men
+will exhibit these graces of Christianity in
+themselves, and combine with them gentleness,
+tolerance, and forbearance, therefore
+they <i>must</i> be held in "with bit and bridle,"&mdash;that
+is, with Articles and Creeds and declarations,&mdash;"lest
+they fall upon thee," and
+fill the Church more full of sedition, disaffection,
+and disquiet than it already is.</p>
+
+<p>Cardinal Newman himself is an example of
+the necessity of the restraints of creeds, as
+well, indeed, as of their general inefficiency to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">67</a></span>
+maintain unity. His "History of my Religious
+Opinions," at least in its beginning,
+is but the story of a long succession of phases
+of belief and disbelief, originating in&mdash;what?
+In study of the Word of God? in Divine
+contemplation, or in devout and thoughtful
+meditation? No, indeed; but in walks and
+conversations, now with one friend, now with
+another, now round the Quadrangle of Oriel,
+then in Christ Church meadows; in fanciful,
+and apparently causeless, changes in his own
+mind, of which sometimes he can give the
+exact date, sometimes he has forgotten it, but
+which lead him out of one set of opinions
+into another in a helpless kind of way, as if
+he knew of no motive power but the influence
+of other men's minds or the momentary and
+fitful fluctuations of a spirit ever too much
+given to introspection to maintain a steady
+and uniform course.</p>
+
+<p>What a contrast between the downright,
+manly straightforwardness of a Ruskin and
+the fluttering, uncertain flights of a Newman,
+ending in the cold, dead fixity of the Roman
+faith, whereof to doubt is to be damned!<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">68</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#V">Letter V</a></span></p>
+
+<h4>On Letter V</h4>
+
+
+<p>The next paragraph to the last in this letter,
+contains a statement which at first might seem
+to be rashly expressed. But I was not long
+in apprehending that when Mr. Ruskin alludes
+to a scheme of pardon "for which we are supposed
+to be thankful, not to the Father, but to
+the Son," he was far from impugning that
+doctrine of the Atonement in which, as it is
+generally understood among Christian people,
+the whole plan of salvation centres.</p>
+
+<p>But there seems to have been a fatality
+about this sentence. Numbers have read it
+and commented upon it, myself amongst the
+number, as if Mr. Ruskin were here expressing
+<i>his own view</i>; instead of which, he is here
+quoting other men's opinions, to condemn
+them with severity. The <i>Record</i> called it
+some of Mr. Ruskin's dross; but it is other
+people's dross, for which he would offer us
+pure gold.</p>
+
+<p>I happened, a very short time previous to
+receiving this letter, to have had my attention
+attracted by the following passage of Mr.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">69</a></span>
+Ruskin's own:&mdash;"When, in the desert, He
+was girding Himself for the work of life,
+angels of life came and ministered to Him;
+now, in the fair world, when He is girding
+Himself for the work of death [at the Transfiguration],
+the ministrants came to Him from
+the grave. But from the grave conquered.
+One from that tomb under Abarim, which
+His own hand had sealed long ago; the
+other from the rest which He had entered
+without seeing corruption."</p>
+
+<p>Pleased with the truthful eloquence of this
+passage, I placed it at the head of the chapter
+on the Transfiguration in my book on the
+Life and Work of Christ (still in the press).
+Having done so, it struck me that Mr. Ruskin,
+whether intentionally or undesignedly, had
+made the pronoun "His" to apply either to
+God the Father, or to God the Son. It may
+grammatically refer to either. From this I
+drew the conclusion which I expressed in a
+short letter to my friend, that, discarding the
+strictly human uses of language, which, from
+its unavoidable poverty, lacks the power of
+marking the true nature of the difference
+between the Divine Persons of the Holy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">70</a></span>
+Trinity, he had spoken of the Father and of
+the Son indiscriminately or indifferently, <i>i.e.</i>,
+without a difference.</p>
+
+<p>And so it really is. How shall a man,
+though at the highest he be "but a little
+lower than the angels," know and comprehend
+the Godhead in its true and exact nature?
+The names father and son express an earthly
+relation perfectly well understood when belonging
+to ourselves, but when applied to
+the Supreme Divine Being, they must of
+necessity fall far short of expressing their
+true connexion with one another. They are,
+when applied to Heavenly beings, merely
+anthropomorphic terms used in compassion
+to our infirmities, and conveying to us only
+an approximation to the ideas intended. We
+say the Father sent the Son; the Son suffered
+for our sins. But since Father and Son are
+One, we are plainly expressing something
+short of the exact state of the case when we
+speak of our thankfulness to the Son as if
+we had no reason to be equally thankful to
+the Father.</p>
+
+<p>The Athanasian Creed makes no great demand
+upon our mental powers when it requires<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">71</a></span>
+of us, in speaking of the Trinity, neither to
+confound the Persons nor to divide the Substance;
+for, in truth, I suppose we are equally
+incapable of doing either.</p>
+
+<p>These are Divine matters, of which, while
+the simplest may know enough, the wisest
+can never fathom the whole depth. For the
+Divine power and love, knowledge and compassion,
+will never be fully comprehended
+until we know even as we are known.</p>
+
+<p>But, as I am abstaining from questioning
+Mr. Ruskin as to his meaning in any passage,
+if it happens to be slightly obscure, awaiting
+his reply at the close of the book, I may here
+say that I believe that this sentence refers to
+a wild and unscriptural kind of preaching,
+happily becoming less common, in which undue
+stress is laid upon the wrathfulness of
+God, as contrasted with the mercy of the
+Saviour, as if we had only the Son to thank,
+and not our loving Father in Heaven, for the
+blessed hope of eternal life. Some there are,
+and always will be, who habitually err in not
+rightly dividing the Word of God, and giving
+undue prominence to a dark portion of doctrine,
+which is true enough in itself, but would be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">72</a></span>
+relieved of much of its gloom, if due prominence
+were given to other parts of the truth
+of God.</p>
+
+<p>I do not mean to praise caution at the
+expense of courage. I have a constitutional
+aversion to that caution allied to timidity and
+cowardice which prompts a man to look to
+his safety, comfort, and worldly repute as
+the first social law that concerns <i>him</i>. I
+admire rather the brave man who is ready
+to sacrifice all that, if he can, by so doing,
+gain the desired right end.</p>
+
+<p>But in the case before us, it is not so.
+Men talk as if all we had to do to convert
+a sinner from the error of his way was to
+give him a good talking, forgetting that we
+have not a plastic material to work upon, but
+a most stubborn and intractable one, wherever
+interest is concerned; and that a bold bad
+man is generally proof against talk, and yields
+to no power but the grace of God exercised
+directly, and seconded by His heavy judgments.
+Have we not all seen, with shame
+and astonishment, the "wicked rich" regularly
+in their places at church, much oftener
+than the "wicked poor," who have less<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">73</a></span>
+interest in playing the hypocrite? And have
+we not felt our utter powerlessness, whether
+by public preaching or by private monition,
+to find a way to those case-hardened hearts?
+What are we to do with such a man as
+Tennyson describes in "Sea Dreams," who</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i8">"began to bloat himself, and ooze<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">All over with the fat affectionate smile<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">That makes the widow lean;"<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>when his victim&mdash;</p>
+
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i4">"Pursued him down the street, and far away,<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">Among the honest shoulders of the crowd,<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">Read rascal in the motions of his back,<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">And scoundrel in the supple-sliding knee."<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+
+
+<p>Here is all that we can do&mdash;told us in the last
+sweet lines:&mdash;</p>
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i4">"'She sleeps: let us too, let all evil, sleep.<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">He also sleeps&mdash;another sleep than ours.<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">He can do no more wrong: forgive him, dear,<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">And I shall sleep the sounder!'<br /></span>
+<span class="i16">Then the man,<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">'His deeds yet live, worst is yet to come;<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">Yet let your sleep for this one night be sound:<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">I do forgive him.'<br /></span>
+<span class="i12">'Thanks, my love,' she said,<br /></span>
+<span class="i4">'Your own will be the sweeter;' and they slept."
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">74</a></span><br /></span>
+
+</div></div>
+<p>
+<span class="sidelink"><a href="#VI">Letter VI</a></span>
+</p>
+
+
+
+<h4>On Letter VI</h4>
+
+<p>As is the manner of our friend, he concludes
+a letter which was begun with thoughtful
+wisdom, with a proposal which, if gravely
+made, will seem to most of us both unpractical
+and impracticable.</p>
+
+<p>Very forcible and very true is the emphatic
+declaration here made of the deep, perhaps
+unpardonable sinfulness of taking in vain the
+holy name of God.</p>
+
+<p>But, to my mind, the irremediable fault
+in the latter proposition in this letter is the
+assumption that every honest clergyman of
+average capacity, and of ordinary experience
+of life, is, of course, wise enough to discern
+men's characters and to judge them with that
+unerring sagacity that will enable him to pronounce
+without favour or distinction of persons
+the severe sentence: "You shall not enter this
+house of God. I interdict your presence here.
+The comforts and privileges of religion are for
+other than thou. I deny thee the prayers, the
+preaching, and the sacraments of the Church."
+More briefly&mdash;"I excommunicate thee."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">75</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Even in the case of a very bad man this
+would be found impossible to accomplish without
+the direst danger to the clergyman's usefulness
+and influence, to say nothing of his
+peace. For our experience abundantly shows
+that let a bad man but be audacious, and even
+ruffianly enough, helped by his position, he
+will always find plenty of support among the
+powerful and influential. The poor and honest
+clergyman, if he has attempted to enforce
+Church discipline, will be gravely rebuked for
+his want of charity, for his sad lack of discretion
+or tact, for his utter want of worldly
+wisdom; he will very soon find, to use the
+familiar phrase, the place too hot for him, and
+he may be thankful if he escapes with some
+small remainder of respect or compassion from
+the nobler-minded of his flock, who are always
+in a very small minority.</p>
+
+<p>I know not how it really was in the time
+when the rubrics of the Communion Services
+were framed. One would think, judging from
+these, that the clergyman possessed unlimited
+power to judge and punish with spiritual deprivation,
+and that he was alone to unite in
+himself all the various offices of accuser and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">76</a></span>
+police, counsel, jury, and judge. We are required
+to say every Ash Wednesday that we
+regret the loss of the godly discipline of the
+Primitive Church&mdash;under which, "at the beginning
+of Lent, all such persons as stood
+convicted of notorious sin were put to open
+penance; and that it is much to be wished
+that the said discipline may be restored
+again." But few can seriously view a realization
+of that wish without fear for the certain
+consequences.</p>
+
+<p>The truth is, the world moves on. Human
+nature may remain the same; but the laws
+and usages of society are subject to changes
+which it is useless to withstand. At the
+present day, great, rather too great, perhaps,
+are the claims of <i>charity</i>. We are told to
+hope for the best in the worst of cases; we
+are to forgive all, even the still hardened and
+unrepenting; we are to smile upon heresy
+and schism; we are to treat the rude, the
+churlish, the hard of heart, amidst our flocks,
+as if we had the greatest regard for them! I
+am not prepared to say that this is in every
+way to be regretted; for these are errors
+that lean perhaps to virtue's side. But I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">77</a></span>
+certainly do think that often a little more
+fearlessness in rebuking vice would not come
+amiss.</p>
+
+<p>But, on the other hand, suppose for a
+moment the clergy to have the undisputed
+power to bar out both the wicked rich and the
+wicked poor from their churches, this power
+would be of very little use; nay, it would be full
+of mischief and danger, without a sound judgment,
+a fearless spirit, and a heart little used
+to the melting mood. The clergy, as a class,
+may perhaps be a trifle superior to the laity in
+moral character, in spiritual knowledge, and
+in judgment in dealing with people, because
+their profession has early trained (or at any
+rate, ought to have trained) them in the constant
+and imperative exercise of self-examination
+and self-control, and the careful discernment
+of character in their intercourse with
+men. But that superiority, if it exists at all,
+is so trifling as to make very little impression
+on the laity, who would naturally be ready
+at any step to dispute the wisdom or expediency
+of the judicial acts of the clergy.</p>
+
+<p>Further, again: given both the wisdom to
+judge and the power to doom, would it be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">78</a></span>
+desirable to establish a rule that the open and
+notorious sinner (though there would always
+be differences of opinion upon what he really
+is, even among the clergy themselves) should
+be prevented from coming where he might,
+above all other places, be most likely to hear
+words that would touch his heart and bring
+him to a better mind? From the pulpit, words
+of counsel, of holy doctrine, and of heart-stirring
+precepts of the Gospel, fall with a power
+and weight which are rarely to be found in
+private conversations. Many an open and
+notorious sinner has first yielded up his heart
+to God under the powerful influence of preaching.
+When Jesus sat in the Pharisee's house,
+all the publicans and sinners drew near to
+hear Him; and the orthodox sinners, the
+Pharisees, made bitter complaints that He received
+and ate with the scorned and rejected
+sinners. God forbid that the day should ever
+come when spiritual pride and exclusiveness
+shall shut out even the hardest of sinners from
+the house of God; for who can tell where or
+when the word may be spoken which shall
+break the stony heart, and replace it with the
+tender heart of flesh, soon to be filled with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">79</a></span>
+love and devotion to God the Saviour and
+Redeemer?</p>
+
+<p>But, as this is a subject of great importance,
+may I also say a word in support
+of Mr. Ruskin's own view that the wicked
+should be discouraged, or even forbidden, to
+enter the house of God? We have 2 Cor. vi.
+14-18, which seems to point out that, in the
+primitive Church, the wicked were not allowed
+in the assemblies of the faithful. And we
+remember David's "I have hated the congregation
+of evil doers, and will not sit with the
+wicked" (Psalm xxvi. 5). Is not Mr. Ruskin,
+perhaps, after all, only advocating a return to
+primitive usage?</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin says in the Preface to his
+selected works: "What I wrote on religion
+was painstaking, and I think forcible, as compared
+with most religious writing; especially
+in its frankness and fearlessness." Unfortunately
+he adds, "But it was wholly mistaken."<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a>
+He is still equally outspoken, frank,
+and fearless; but what he wrote upon religion,
+as far as I know it, in the days which he now
+condemns, will live and do good, as long as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">80</a></span>
+the noble English language, of which he is
+one of the greatest masters, lives to convey to
+distant generations the great thoughts of the
+sons that are her proudest boast.</p>
+
+
+
+<h5>Additional Remarks on the Censures
+of the Church.</h5>
+
+<h6>By the Editor.</h6>
+
+<p>Since writing my notes on <a href="#VI">Letter VI.</a>, in
+which Mr. Ruskin gives such vehement expression
+to his desire to see the ancient discipline
+of the Church restored, I have in
+conversation with himself learned this to be
+one of the objects he has most at heart in
+writing these letters; and I have also read in
+the Life of Bishop Selwyn, by the Rev. H. W.
+Tucker (vol. i., p. 241) that admirable prelate's
+view of this disregarded question. I believe
+Selwyn to have been the greatest uninspired
+missionary since the days of St. Paul (if indeed
+we can with truth consider so great a man
+wholly uninspired). But the great Bishop of
+the South Seas, in the charge from which
+copious extracts are there given, distinctly
+recommends the revival of spiritual discipline<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">81</a></span>
+and the censures of the Church upon unrepenting
+offenders. He refers for authority to
+apostolic example and precept, and to the
+discipline rubrics of the Communion Service,
+and adds the undeniable fact that our Anglican
+communion is the only branch of the Christian
+Church where such discipline is wanting.</p>
+
+<p>I must ask leave to refer my readers to Mr.
+Tucker's book for the grounds in detail of the
+Bishop's wishes. I am not aware that any
+English prelate has ventured upon so hazardous
+an experiment; one, I should rather say, so
+certain to fail disastrously. The infancy of
+the Christian Church, and the Divine guidance
+directly exercised, rendered such discipline in
+the first centuries both practicable and effective.<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a>
+But I do not remember that any
+parish priest of the Reformed Church has ever<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">82</a></span>
+attempted to enforce the Communion rubrics,
+except, as we have learned from the public
+papers, in recent times, with disastrous consequences
+to the promoters. And what kind of
+wickedness is to be so visited? To prove
+drunkenness, or impurity, or fraudulent practices,
+or false doctrine (Canon 109), a judicial
+inquiry must be resorted to. Rebukes for
+lesser offences would certainly lead to disputes,
+if not even to recrimination! The irresistible
+circumstances of the age would entirely defeat
+any such endeavours. In towns, parochial
+limits are practically unknown or ignored, and
+families, or individuals, attend whatever church
+or chapel they please, no one preventing them,
+thus making all exercise of sacerdotal authority
+impracticable. In the country, even where
+only the parish church is within reach, it is
+highly probable that an offender would meet
+priestly excommunication by the easy expedient
+of cutting himself off from communication with
+his clergyman and his church; and even if he
+did not, it would be a very new state of things
+if the sentence were received with submission
+on the part of the offender, and acquiescence
+on that of the congregation.</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">83</a></span>In short, the thing is simply impossible;
+and I do not find that even Bishop Selwyn
+himself visited immorality with ecclesiastical
+censures, or supported his clergy in doing so;
+and I am using the word "immorality" in its
+full and proper sense, and not with that restricted
+meaning which confines it to a particular
+sin. It is true, as he says, that our
+Church stands alone in refraining from the
+exercise of such power. But in other religious
+bodies, the discretionary power to use such
+dangerous weapons is not left to individuals
+however gifted. It rests in a constituted body,
+on whom the whole responsibility would lie.
+But the isolation of the English clergyman in
+his church and parish forbids him thus to risk
+his whole usefulness and his social existence.
+Who would confirm him in his judgment?
+Who would stand by him in the troubles
+which he would assuredly entail upon himself?
+Would his churchwardens, his rural dean, his
+archdeacon, or his bishop? I think there
+would be little comfort to be found in any of
+these quarters.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">84</a></span>
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="sidelink"><a href="#VII">Letter VII</a></span>
+</p>
+
+
+<h4>On Letter VII</h4>
+
+<p>Excellent as is <a href="#From_the_Rev_Canon_Gray">Canon Gray's letter</a> (p. <a href="#Page_169">169</a>),
+I do not at all concur in his somewhat severe
+censure on the second paragraph in this letter,
+in which Mr. Ruskin, as I conceive, with complete
+theological accuracy, points out how in
+His human nature our Lord accepted and received
+some, perhaps many, of the deficiencies
+of our nature, human frailty and weakness,
+even human <i>liability</i> to sin, without, however,
+once yielding to its temptations. I have everywhere
+in my "Life of Christ" endeavoured to
+give reasons for my faith in this view, which,
+even if held, I know is not often professed.</p>
+
+<p>If Christ had been perfectly insensible to
+the allurements of sin, where would be His
+fellow-feeling with us? It would be a mere
+outward semblance; nor would there then be
+any significance in the statement that "He
+was in all points tempted like as we are," if
+He had been able to view with calm indifference
+the inducements presented to Him from
+time to time to abandon His self-sacrificing
+work and consult His safety. The captain is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">85</a></span>
+not to go securely armour-plated into the
+fight while the private soldier marches in
+his usual unprotected apparel. Nor will
+the Captain of our salvation protect Himself
+against the dangers which He invites us to
+encounter. If He knew nothing of sin from
+experience of its power, how could He be
+an example to us? Therefore I believe Mr.
+Ruskin to be perfectly right in affirming that
+in the words of Jesus we listen not to one
+speaking entirely in the Power and Wisdom
+of God, but to the Son of Man, bowed down,
+but not conquered, by afflictions, firm and
+unbending in His great purpose to bear in
+His own body the sin of the world&mdash;Son of
+Man, yet God Incarnate.</p>
+
+<p>Nor does it seem to me "a hard way of
+speaking" when Mr. Ruskin rightly and
+plainly affirms the perfect humanity of Christ,
+which, however, Canon Gray correctly points
+out to be assumed and borne in accordance
+with His own will as perfect God. I am
+afraid that, good and kind as he is, it is
+Canon Gray himself who is a little hard in
+unconsciously imputing thoughts which had
+no existence in the writer's mind!<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">86</a></span></p>
+
+<p>I cannot help being amused at the gravity
+with which certain critics shake their heads
+ominously over the last paragraph in this
+letter, and seriously ask, What can Mr.
+Ruskin mean by the "peace and joy in the
+Holy Ghost" enjoyed by the birds? The
+Poet Laureate would hardly care to be
+brought to book for each poetical flight with
+which he charms his many appreciative
+readers, and to be asked to explain exactly
+what he means by each of those noble
+thoughts which are only revealed from soul
+to soul, and dissolve into fluid, like the beautiful
+brittle-star of our coasts, under the touch
+of a too curious hand.</p>
+
+<p>How do we know but that the animal
+existence of these charming companions of
+our quiet hours is not accompanied by a
+spiritual existence too, as much inferior to
+our own spiritual state as their corporeal to
+ours? And therefore shall we boldly dare
+to say that they perish altogether and for
+ever? We may neither believe nor disbelieve
+in matters kept so completely secret from us.
+But we must be pardoned for leaning to a
+belief that the feathered creatures which spend<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">87</a></span>
+most of their brief life in singing loud praises
+to the loving Creator and Giver of all good,
+do not live quite for nothing beyond the
+dissolution of their little frames. There are
+no means of ascertaining this by scientific
+experiments, or even by the most ingenious
+processes of induction carefully recorded and
+duly referred to as occasion may arise. But
+certainly it is a harmless fancy which many
+have indulged in before Mr. Ruskin, without
+being charged with such unsoundness in
+doctrine as denying the Personality of the
+Holy Ghost! By-and-by it may be found
+that what men have believed in half in sport
+will be realized wholly in earnest. Just
+outside the churchyard wall of Ecclesfield
+may be seen (at least I saw it a few years
+ago) a little monumental stone to a favourite
+dog, with the text, "Thou, Lord, preservest
+man and beast." And in Kingsley's "Prose
+Idylls" I have just met most <i>Ă propos</i> with
+the following beautiful passage, which many
+will read with pleasure, perhaps some with
+profit:&mdash;</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>"If anyone shall hint to us that we and the birds
+may have sprung originally from the same type; that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">88</a></span>
+the difference between our intellect and theirs is one
+of degree, and not of kind, we may believe or doubt:
+but in either case we shall not be greatly moved.
+'So much the better for the birds,' we will say, 'and
+none the worse for us. You raise the birds towards
+us: but you do not lower us towards them.' What we
+are, we are by the grace of God. Our own powers
+and the burden of them we know full well. It does
+not lessen their dignity or their beauty in our eyes
+to hear that the birds of the air partake, even a little,
+of the same gifts of God as we. Of old said St.
+Guthlac in Crowland, as the swallows sat upon his
+knee, 'He who leads his life according to the will of
+God, to him the wild deer and the wild birds draw
+more near;' and this new theory of yours may prove
+St. Guthlac right. St. Francis, too&mdash;he called the
+birds his brothers. Whether he was correct, either
+theologically or zoologically, he was plainly free from
+that fear of being mistaken for an ape, which haunts
+so many in these modern times. Perfectly sure that
+he himself was a spiritual being, he thought it at least
+possible that birds might be spiritual beings likewise,
+incarnate like himself in mortal flesh; and saw no
+degradation to the dignity of human nature in claiming
+kindred lovingly with creatures so beautiful, so
+wonderful, who (as he fancied in his old-fashioned
+way) praised God in the forest, even as angels did
+in heaven. In a word, the saint, though he was
+an ascetic, and certainly no man of science, was
+yet a poet, and somewhat of a philosopher; and
+would possibly&mdash;so do extremes meet&mdash;have hailed as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">89</a></span>
+orthodox, while we hail as truly scientific, Wordsworth's
+great saying&mdash;</p>
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i6">'Therefore am I still<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">A lover of the meadows and the woods<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">And mountains; and of all that we behold<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">From this green earth; of all the mighty world<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Of eye and ear&mdash;both what they half create,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">And what perceive; well pleased to recognize<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">In Nature and the language of the sense,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">The anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">The guide, the guardian of my heart, and soul<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Of all my moral being.'"<br /></span>
+<br />
+<span class="i8"><i>Charm of Birds.</i><br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>
+<span class="sidelink"><a href="#VIII">Letter VIII</a></span>
+</p>
+
+<h4>On Letter VIII</h4>
+
+<p>What generous and enlightened spirit will
+not be stirred to its innermost depths by
+these words, burning as they are with a
+well-grounded indignation?</p>
+
+<p>I dare say some of the clergy will have a
+word to say on their claim to the priesthood
+as implying a sacrificial and mediatorial character.
+On this point I will say nothing at
+present.</p>
+
+<p>But it is an awfully solemn consideration
+put before us here, whether instead of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">90</a></span>
+pure blessings and the bright countenances
+intended to be ours, our accursed blessings
+and defiled faces are not the natural consequences
+of our wilful misunderstanding of
+what the will of the Lord is.</p>
+
+<p>"Thy will be done" is a petition which
+can be offered up in two quite distinct senses.
+In the one, it is an expression of resignation
+to the Father's afflictive dispensations; in the
+other, the heartfelt desire to work out the
+revealed will of God in all the many-sided
+aspects of life. In the first sense, when
+sorrow or death has entered our door, our
+first impulse, if we are Christians, is to give
+evidence of, and expression to, our resignation
+by recognizing the <i>will of God</i>. Hence
+Mr. Ruskin interposes: "Are you so sure
+that it <i>was</i> the will of God that your child
+should die, or that you should have got into
+that trouble?" I look in my local paper
+in the column of deaths, and see in a neighbouring
+large town how extraordinary a proportion
+of deaths are those of children. I
+have taken occasional cemetery duty in one
+of the busiest centres of industry in Yorkshire,
+and was shocked at the large numbers<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">91</a></span>
+of funerals in white. Am I to believe it was
+the <i>will of God</i> that so many young children
+should perish, especially as I look to my own
+beautiful parish, with its sweet sea and mountain
+breezes mingled, where the deaths of
+children are comparatively rare? and am I
+not forced to believe that, even without the
+assistance of destitution&mdash;neglect and overcrowding,
+and "quieting mixtures" and ardent
+spirits, and kicks and blows have filled most
+of those little graves? I fear that the will
+of Satan is here being accomplished vastly
+to his satisfaction. And seldom does the
+Government do more than touch the fringe
+of these monstrous evils. Of course they say
+"We cannot interfere," or "Legislation in
+these matters is impracticable." But can we
+not all remember when it was just as certain
+that free trade in food was impracticable? but
+who does not see that it is saving us from
+famine this dark year 1879?&mdash;that compulsory
+education was revolutionary and full of
+unimaginable perils to the country, and yet who
+are so glad as the poor themselves, now that
+it has been carried into effect? It used to be
+thought that if people chose to kill themselves<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">92</a></span>
+with unwholesome open drains before their
+doors, there was no power able to prevent them.
+But we are wiser now. Legislators have generally
+been, or chosen to appear, like cowards
+till the time for action came, very late, and then
+they were decided enough. Now let us hope
+that a way may be found to save infant life from
+premature extinction by wholesale.</p>
+
+<p>Let me use this opportunity of saying that
+in the letters we are now considering there is
+a feature which ought not to escape those who
+are desirous of deriving good from them; and
+that is that in their very condensed form no
+time is taken for explanation or expansion.
+Mr. Ruskin speaks as unto wise men, and
+asks us to judge for ourselves what he says.
+But my own experience, after frequent perusal
+of them, shows me that there is a vast
+fund of truth in them which becomes apparent
+only after patient consideration and reflection.
+Without desiring at all to bestow extravagant
+praise on my kind friend, or any other distinguished
+man, it is only fair and just to own
+that the truth that is in these letters shines
+out more and more the more closely they are
+examined. It is a gift that God has given<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">93</a></span>
+him, which has cost him far more pain, worry,
+and vexation, through all kinds of wilful and
+envious, as well as innocent and unconscious
+misrepresentation, than ever it has gained him
+of credit or renown.</p>
+
+<p>This principle leads me to view <i>now</i> with
+approbation what I could not read at first
+without an unpleasant feeling. The sentence:
+"Nearly the whole Missionary body (with
+the hottest Evangelical section of the English
+Church) is at this moment composed of men
+who think the Gospel they are to carry to mend
+the world with, forsooth, is this, 'If any man
+sin, he hath an Advocate with the Father.'"
+And when I first read it to my reverend
+brethren, hard words were spoken of this passage,
+because in its terseness, in its elliptic
+form, it easily allows itself to be misunderstood.
+Yet the paragraph contains the essence
+of the Gospel expressed with a faithful boldness
+not often met with in pulpit addresses.</p>
+
+<p>"If any man sin, we have an Advocate with
+the Father." We have here a solemn and
+momentous truth, expressed in few words, as
+clearly and as briefly as any geometrical definition.
+But is this <i>all</i> the Gospel? Will this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">94</a></span>
+alone "mend the world, forsooth"? Now the
+extreme men of one particular school in the
+English Church do really preach little else
+beside this. When they are entreated to
+preach upon good works, too, and unfold a
+little of their value and beauty,&mdash;if they have
+any at all,&mdash;the answer is always to the effect,
+"Oh, of course; faith in Christ must of necessity
+beget the love of good works. These are
+the signs of that. Preach Christ crucified,
+and all the rest will be sure to follow." And
+this is what is exclusively called "preaching
+the Gospel." The preacher who teaches us
+to love our enemies, to live pure lives, to be
+honourable to all men and women, to bring
+up our families in the truth, is frowned upon
+as a "legal preacher." As a clergyman myself,
+I am not afraid of saying that I look upon
+this so-called Gospel-preaching as fraught with
+not a little of danger. God knows, wicked
+sinners are found in every congregation and
+class of men, kneeling to pray, and singing
+praises, exactly like good men. Now I can
+hardly conceive a style and matter of preaching
+more calculated to excuse and palliate,
+and almost encourage sin, than this narrow<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">95</a></span>
+and exclusive so-called Gospel-preaching.
+Neither Christ nor His apostles taught thus
+at all. The whole Sermon on the Mount is
+moral in the highest and purest sense. Every
+epistle has its moral or <i>legal</i> side. "Woe is
+me if I preach not the Gospel!" and I cannot
+be preaching the Gospel unless, along with
+the great proclamation, "If any man sin, we
+have an Advocate with the Father," I also do
+my utmost to teach "what the will of the
+Lord is" concerning a pure, holy, and blameless
+life, full of active, good works, done in
+deep humility and self-abasement; because
+Christ loved me and died for me, and asks
+me, in love to Him, to walk in His steps.</p>
+
+<p>
+<span class="sidelink"><a href="#IX">Letter IX</a></span>
+</p>
+
+<h4>On Letter IX</h4>
+
+<p>I fancy I can still hear the murmur of angry
+dissent pass round as I read to my reverend
+brethren this indignant plea for a higher interpretation
+of the petition for daily bread than
+that which passes current with the unthinking,
+self-indulgent world. Nevertheless, this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">96</a></span>
+manifestation of feeling was not general, and
+I thoroughly agree with Mr. Ruskin that the world
+has, from the first, used this prayer
+thoughtlessly and blasphemously; and probably
+will continue to do so to the end, when
+the thoughts and imaginations of all men's
+hearts shall be revealed, and no more disguises
+shall be possible; when the masked
+hypocrite's smile shall be torn from him and
+reveal the covetousness that breeds in his
+heart to its core; when the honourable man
+shall no longer be confounded with thieves,
+nor the usurer and extortioner be courted and
+bowed to like an honest man.</p>
+
+<p>The veil that hid the true Christ, as Mr.
+Ruskin has well remarked, was removed in
+the breaking of bread with the disciples at
+Emmaus. As the Master, so the true disciples.
+They too may be known both by the
+spiritual breaking of the Bread of Life in the
+Holy Communion (though the canting hypocrite
+too may be found polluting that holy
+rite); but more especially in the union of
+the sacred ordinance with obedience to the
+scarcely less sacred command of Christian love
+and charity to the poor. There may be the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">97</a></span>
+empty profession, but there will be none of
+the reality of the religion of the Gospel, unless
+we are partakers of the bread broken at the
+Lord's Table, or unless we eat the bread
+earned by the honest labour of our hands or
+of our brains, or share some of our bread with
+those, the Lord's brethren, whom He has left
+for us to care for in His name. The absence
+of either of these three essential conditions
+just lays us open to the charge of flaunting
+before the world a false and spurious Christianity.
+In the plain words of our friend, our
+bread not being fairly got or fairly used, is
+stolen bread.</p>
+
+<p>But I would willingly believe that it is only
+by a strong figure of speech that we clergy
+are here again emphatically called upon to
+act the part of inquisitors by pointedly demanding
+of every member of our flock a
+precise account of the manner in which he
+earns his livelihood. Still, if the answer was
+not a surprised and indignant stare, I believe
+the great mass of men would probably be able
+to give an answer which should abundantly
+satisfy themselves and us, until Mr. Ruskin
+threw his own light upon the answer and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">98</a></span>
+demonstrated that the notions of modern
+civilized society are not in accordance with
+the highest teaching. According to our ideas,
+the artisan, the tradesman, the merchant, the
+members of the learned and the military and
+naval professions, all those engaged in the
+various departments of government work, from
+the cabinet minister down to the last office
+clerk,&mdash;all these use the labour of body or of
+mind, and in return receive the necessaries or
+the luxuries of life for themselves and their
+households. Men who are, if they please,
+exempt altogether from such labour, as large
+landed proprietors, are certainly under a
+temptation to lead a life of ease and leisure.
+But it is very seldom that we are offended
+with the sight of a landlord so unmindful of
+social duties as to take no personal active
+interest in the welfare and conduct of his
+tenants, or forgetful of the responsibilities to
+his country imposed upon him by his rank
+and position.</p>
+
+<p>It is to be hoped that Mr. Ruskin does not
+in all solemn seriousness really expect that
+after a fair examination of the modes of life
+of all these people, "an entirely new view of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">99</a></span>
+life and its sacraments will open upon us and
+them." Is it indeed a fact that "the great
+mass of men calling themselves Christians do
+actually live by robbing the poor of their bread,
+and by no other trade whatsoever"? Mr.
+Ruskin is always terribly in earnest in whatever
+he says, and we must look for an explanation
+of this sentence in the very decided
+views he holds upon interest of money, which
+he calls usury.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin classes Usury and Interest together.
+Here are some of his strong words
+upon this subject: "There is absolutely no
+debate possible as to what usury is, any more
+than what adultery is. The Church has only
+been polluted by indulgence in it since the
+16th century. Usury is any kind whatever
+of interest on loan, and it is the essential
+modern force of Satan." This was written
+September 9th of this year. In "Fors Clavigera,"
+Letter lxxxii., p. 323, he challenged
+the Bishop of Manchester to answer him the
+question, whether he considered "usury to be
+a work of the Lord"?<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> In the same letter,
+to place his heavy denunciation against the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">100</a></span>
+wickedness of usury in the best possible
+company, he pleads: "Plato's scheme was
+impossible even in his own day,&mdash;as Bacon's
+New Atlantis in <i>his</i> day,&mdash;as Calvin's reform
+in <i>his</i> day,&mdash;as Goethe's Academe in his; but
+of the good there was in all these men, the
+world gathered what it could find of evil."</p>
+
+
+<p>Let us look a little closer into this matter.
+It is not because a man with fearless frankness
+breasts the full torrent of popular persuasion
+and universal practice that he is to
+be thrust aside as a fanatic, with hard words
+and unfeeling sneers concerning his sanity.
+Here, again, I avow my persuasion that Mr.
+Ruskin is, in one sense, too far in advance,
+and, in another, too far in the rear of the
+time; and while I attempt an explanatory justification
+of the modern practice, I admit that
+it is only "for the hardness of our hearts"
+and because the golden age is still far off.</p>
+
+<p>The Mosaic law was severe against usury
+and increase, forbidding it under heavy threatenings
+among the faithful Israelites, but allowing
+it in lending to strangers. "If thy brother
+be waxen poor, then thou shalt relieve him
+... take thou no usury of him, or increase"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">101</a></span>
+(Lev. xxv. 35, 36). "Thou shalt not lend upon
+usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury
+of victuals, usury of anything that is lent upon
+usury. <i>Unto a stranger</i> thou mayest lend
+upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt
+not lend upon usury" (Deut. xxiii. 19, 20).
+"Lord, who shall abide in Thy tabernacle?
+... He that putteth not out his money to
+usury" (Psalm xv. 1, 5. See Ezek. xviii. 7,
+etc.) And to come to the Christian law, we
+have the mild general principle: "If ye lend
+to them of whom ye hope to receive, what
+thank have ye? for sinners also lend to
+sinners, to receive as much again....
+Lend, hoping for nothing again, and your
+reward shall be great" (Luke vi. 34, 35).</p>
+
+<p>So far the Law of Moses and the Gospel.</p>
+
+<p>But our Lord, in the Parable of the Talents,
+appears to actually sanction the practice of
+loans upon interest: "Thou oughtest, therefore,
+to have put my money to the exchangers,
+and then at my coming I should have received
+mine own with usury" (Matt. xxv. 27). The
+preceding verse, the 26th, may well be understood
+to be a question&mdash;Didst thou indeed
+think so? It does not even indirectly attribute<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">102</a></span>
+hardness and oppression to our Lord.<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> I
+am quite aware that it may be replied that
+this is an instance of those strong audacious
+metaphors, where the fact used by way of
+illustration is instinctively overleaped by the
+mind of the hearer to arrive at the lesson
+which it marks and emphasizes; as when the
+Lord is represented as an unjust judge, or
+Paul speaks of grafting the wild olive branch
+upon the good, or James refers to the rust
+and canker upon gold and silver, or Milton
+speaks of certain bishops as "blind mouths."<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a>
+But in all these cases, the hyperbole is manifest;
+it is an untruth or a disguise, which
+not only does not deceive, but teaches a great
+truth. Our Lord's reference to money-lenders
+or exchangers appears to lend an indirect
+sanction to a familiar practice.</p>
+
+
+<p>The Law of Moses, therefore, rebuking the
+practice of lending for increase among brethren
+and encouraging it in dealing with strangers,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">103</a></span>
+combined with the well-known avarice of
+the Jews to make them money-lenders on a
+large scale, and at high rates of interest, to
+the prodigals and spendthrifts, the bankrupt
+barons and needy sovereigns of the middle
+ages. Money was rarely lent for commercial
+purposes, and to advance the real prosperity
+of the borrower. It was generally to stave off
+want for the time; and principal and interest,
+when pay-day came, had generally to be
+found in the pastures or strongholds of the
+enemy. High interest was charged, on account
+of the extraordinary precariousness
+of what was called the security. Grinding
+and grasping undoubtedly the money-lenders
+would be, from the hardship of their case.
+Reckless extravagance and lavish profusion
+were, in those non-commercial ages, highly
+applauded. The spendthrift and the prodigal
+was the favourite of the multitude; the rich
+money-lender was hated and abused, while
+his money-bags were sought after with all the
+eagerness of hard-driving poverty. They
+reviled the careful and economical Israelite;
+they looked with horror upon his vast accumulations
+of capital, and never remembered<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">104</a></span>
+to thank him for the safety they owed to him
+from the violent hands of their own soldiers
+and retainers.</p>
+
+<p>All this went on until the sixteenth or
+seventeenth century. I have before me a
+very curious old book, lent to me by Mr.
+Ruskin, entitled, "The English Usurer: or,
+Usury Condemned by the most learned and
+famous Divines of the Church of England.
+Collected by John Blaxton, Preacher of God's
+Word at Osmington, in Dorsetshire, 1634."</p>
+
+<p>The language throughout the book is of
+extreme violence against all manner of usury.
+The compiler gives a collection of the most
+emphatic testimonies of the greatest preachers
+of the day against this "detestable vice."
+Bishop Jewell calls it "a most filthy trade, a
+trade which God detesteth, a trade which is
+the very overthrow of all Christian love."
+There is, it must be admitted, no sort of
+argument attempted in the long extract from
+Bishop Jewell's sermon to demonstrate the
+wickedness of the practice against which he
+launches his fierce invectives, but he certainly
+brings his sermon to a conclusion with a
+threat of extreme measures "if they continue<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">105</a></span>
+therein. I will open their shame and denounce
+excommunication against them, and
+publish their names in this place before you
+all, that you may know them, and abhor
+them as the plagues and monsters of this
+world; that if they be past all fear of God,
+they may yet repent and amend for worldly
+shame."</p>
+
+<p>This was Bishop Jewell preaching in the
+middle of the 16th century; and such were
+the strong terms very generally employed
+by good and thoughtful men at that day.
+Bacon (Essay 41) says that one of the objections
+against usury is that "it is against
+nature for money to beget money!" Antonio,
+in "The Merchant of Venice," asks:</p>
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i6">"When did friendship take<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">A <i>breed</i> of barren metal of his friend?"<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<p>And his practice was "neither to lend nor
+borrow by taking nor giving of excess," which
+brought upon him the malice and vindictiveness
+of the Jew&mdash;</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i6">"that in low simplicity<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">He lends out money gratis, and brings down<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">The rate of usance here with us in Venice."<br /></span>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">106</a></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>Philip, in Tennyson's "Brook "&mdash;a simple man
+in later times&mdash;</p>
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i0">"Could not understand how money breeds,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Thought it a dead thing."<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<p>But there were men, too, who saw that the
+taking of moderate interest was a blameless
+act. Calvin was a contemporary of Bishop
+Jewell, and his mind exhibits a curious mixture
+of feelings upon the subject. Blaxton
+triumphantly places a sentence from Calvin's
+"Epistola de Usura" as a battle-flag in his
+title-page:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>"In republica bene constituta nemo fænerator
+tolerabilis est; sed omnino debet e consortio
+hominum rejici." "An usurer is not
+tolerable in a well-established Commonwealth,
+but utterly to be rejected out of the company
+of men." So again, in his Commentary on
+Deuteronomy. But again, in a passage quoted
+from the same author, without reference, in
+Dugald Stewart's Preliminary Dissertation
+(Encyd. Brit.) we come across a different
+view.</p>
+
+<p>"'Money begets not money!'&mdash;What does
+the sea beget? What the house for which I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">107</a></span>
+receive rent? Is silver brought forth from
+the walls and the roof? But that is produced
+from land, and that is drawn forth from the
+sea, which shall produce money; and the convenience
+of a house is paid for with a stipulated
+sum. Now if better profit can be derived
+from the letting out of money than by the
+letting of an estate, shall a profit be made by
+letting perhaps some barren land to a farmer,
+and shall it not be allowed to him who lends
+a sum of money? He who gets an estate by
+purchase, shall he not from that money derive
+an annual profit? Whence then is the merchant's
+profit? You will say, from his diligence
+and industry. Does anyone suppose
+that money ought to lie idle and unprofitable?
+He who borrows of me is not going to let the
+loan lie idle. He is not going to draw profit
+from the money itself, but from the goods
+bought with it. Those reasonings, therefore,
+against usury are subtle, and have a certain
+plausibility; but they fall as soon as they are
+examined more narrowly. I therefore conclude
+that we are to judge of usury, not from any
+particular passage of Scripture, but by the
+ordinary rules of justice and equity."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">108</a></span></p>
+
+<p>To come at once to modern days and practical
+views. Let us suppose lending on interest
+forbidden by the Church and the law. Then
+sums of money required for good and legitimate
+business purposes must be begged as a
+great favour. No honourable man would do
+this. The instinctive repugnance felt by an
+independent man to place himself under pecuniary
+obligations which he could not reciprocate
+would stop many a promising young man
+of slender means from going to college, many
+a good man of business from using the most
+favourable opportunities. I am not speaking
+of borrowing money to gain temporary relief
+from pecuniary embarrassment, but of money
+honourably desired to realize advantages of
+apparent life-value. So the necessitous would
+be doomed to remain in hopeless necessity
+until some benevolently-minded person with
+a mass of loose unemployed capital came to
+his rescue, and such men are not to be met
+with every day.</p>
+
+<p>So far for the man who would like to borrow,
+but that the law will not allow it except as a
+free loan or gift. Then for the willing lender,
+if he dared. He has, say, a few thousands in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">109</a></span>
+hand, which he does not wish to spend.
+He looks round, if he is anxious to use it
+for good, for an object of his charity who
+seems least likely to disappoint him. Does our
+experience of human nature teach that a sense
+of gratitude for benefits received is a good
+security for honourable conduct? Alas! in a
+multitude of cases&mdash;I fear the majority&mdash;the
+lender would only be met with cold and alienated
+looks when he expected to receive his
+own again, if indeed he found anywhere at all
+the object of his kindness. The memory of
+past ingratitude, the fear of worse to come,
+would dry the sources of benevolence, and
+make the upright and honest to suffer equally
+with the swindler and the hypocrite.</p>
+
+<p>But there is no such fear now. The recognized
+system of lending upon approved
+security for a fair and moderate rate of
+interest removes the irksome, galling sense
+of obligation, and enables any man to borrow
+with a feeling that if he receives an obligation
+he is also conferring one; that if he makes
+ten per cent, by trading, or a good stipend
+by his degree, he will divide his profits fairly
+with the man who served him, and that he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">110</a></span>
+is helping him in his turn to keep his money
+together for the sake of his children after
+him. Take away these benefits, and what
+good is done by free lending? Not any
+that we can see with ordinary eyes, but a
+good deal of suspicion, disappointment, ingratitude,
+and loss.</p>
+
+<p>An honourable man would a hundred times
+rather accept a loan as a matter of profit to
+the lender than as a charity to himself. The
+right result of an honourable system of borrowing
+and lending with equal advantage to both,
+<i>is</i> the will of God, and not contrary to sanctification.
+The result of a compulsory system
+of charitable loans would lead only to the
+destruction of credit and mutual confidence,
+and the sacrifice of a multitude of Christian
+graces and virtues.</p>
+
+<p>We cannot help observing with what vehemence
+Mr. Ruskin constantly thrusts the
+thief, the adulterer, and the usurer all into
+the same boat to be tossed against the
+breakers of his wrath. Now I would ask
+some one of those numerous disciples of his,
+whose affection almost prompts them to say
+to him, "I will follow thee whithersoever<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">111</a></span>
+thou goest," "Pray, my good friend, what
+is your own practice? Providence has
+blessed you with ease and affluence far
+more than you need for daily bread. What
+do you do with your money? Of course
+you would never think of investing in consols,
+in railway shares, or dock-bonds, would
+you? you would not lend money upon mortgage,
+or exact rent for your household and
+landed property? I see that you hesitate
+a little; you have something to confess.
+Come! what is it?" And my amiable friend
+replies, "Oh, but you see all the world
+is gone after interest of money; all our
+mutual relations are so intimately bound up
+with that accursed, abominable practice, that
+I have no alternative. <i>I have</i> large sums
+lodged in various safe investments, and
+employ an agent to collect my rents and
+settle with my tenants." And so I am forced
+to exclaim, "What! you who are persuaded
+that usury, and theft, and adultery, are all
+of equal blackness, if you find that one
+sin is unavoidable, what about the other
+two? Would you then invite the robber and
+the licentious to sin with impunity, as you<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">112</a></span>
+practise your own convenient iniquity, with
+the applause of the world and your own
+acquiescence?"</p>
+
+<p>Positively I see no escape from this argument.
+It is the <i>argumentum ad hominem</i>,&mdash;generally
+an uncivil mode of address; but
+here, at any rate, it is impersonally used.</p>
+
+<p>These are my views frankly stated. If
+I am wrong, even by the highest standard
+of Christian ethics, I shall be thankful for
+Mr. Ruskin's corrections.</p>
+
+<p>
+<span class="sidelink"><a href="#X">Letter X</a></span>
+</p>
+
+<h4>On Letter X</h4>
+
+<p>The letters which I have received up to
+the present time (October 31st) in reply to
+Mr. Ruskin's have not failed to bring me not a
+little of disappointment. On the one hand, I
+see a man noble and elevated in his aims, and
+with highest aspirations, desiring nothing so
+fervently as to see the world and its pastors
+and teachers rising to the highest attainable
+level of religious and moral excellence; fearlessly
+rebuking the evils he sees so clearly;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">113</a></span>
+clothing thoughts that consume him in words
+that stir our inmost hearts; and yet I see him
+unavoidably missing his aim as all men are
+liable to do, through the defect of possessing
+human language alone as the channel to convey
+divine meanings; and, moreover, who cannot
+at every turn stay the course of their reasoning
+to explain that that which they speak apparently,
+and from the necessities of language,
+to <i>all</i>, is, as the most ordinary apprehension
+would perceive, really addressed to <i>some</i>.</p>
+
+<p>On the other side, while I hear many expressing
+their thankfulness that things are
+now being said that "wanted saying," and
+are being spoken out with uncompromising
+boldness, others receive them with impatience,
+with irritation, with exasperation. I have been
+gravely advised to recommend Mr. Ruskin to
+withdraw these letters, to wash my hands of
+them, etc. Sometimes this arises from unfamiliarity
+with Mr. Ruskin's most famous
+works; sometimes from entire unacquaintance
+with their number and their nature; as when
+a friend wrote to me before he saw or heard
+a word of the letters:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>"If Mr. Ruskin thinks we have generally<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">114</a></span>
+read his <i>publication</i> (<i>sic</i>) I think he is mistaken;
+all I know of <i>it</i> is that I have occasionally
+seen <i>it</i> quoted in newspapers, from which
+I gather that he holds peculiar opinions."</p>
+
+<p>A lady, who looked well to the ways of her
+household, but knew very little of books, once
+asked me if Mr. Ruskin had not written a
+book called the "Old Red Sandstone." I
+hinted that probably she meant the "Stones
+of Venice," which was indeed the case. She
+knew it was something about stones! But
+she was an excellent creature nevertheless!</p>
+
+<p>These two traits may fairly be paired
+together.</p>
+
+<p>It should be observed, by clergymen especially
+who read these letters attentively, that
+they contain just what we clergy ought to
+be told sometimes by laymen, to whom we
+preach with perfect impunity, but who as a rule
+rarely make reply. I have just read Lord
+Carnarvon's excellent address on Preaching,
+delivered at the Winchester Diocesan Conference,
+and thank him as I thank, and for the
+same reason that I thank, Mr. Ruskin. We
+need to be told wholesome though unpalatable
+truths sometimes, when we have descended<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">115</a></span>
+from our castle-pulpits to meet, it may be, the
+eyes, and hear the voices, of impatient, irritated,
+and prejudiced critics.</p>
+
+<p>I do not remember that so bold an attack,
+and yet so friendly, has ever before been made
+upon our weak points in modern times; and
+I may justly claim for Mr. Ruskin's letters a
+calm, self-searching, and, if need be, a self-condemning
+and self-sacrificing, examination.
+We are all too apt to cry "Peace, peace, where
+there is no peace." Why should the shepherds
+of Britain claim for themselves a more indulgent
+regard than the shepherds of Israel,
+whom Ezekiel, by the word of the Lord,
+addressed in the 33rd and 34th chapters of
+his prophecy?</p>
+
+<p>Concerning the letter before us on the forgiveness
+of sins&mdash;each other's sins or debts,
+and our sins before God&mdash;it is not a question
+of theology, but of simple moral right and
+wrong; and I defy Mr. Ruskin's bitterest
+censors to deny, that, in this wicked world,
+men are more in earnest in deceiving, injuring,
+and swindling their friends than they
+are in seeking the love of their enemies.
+Has not our Lord told us long ago that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">116</a></span>
+"the children of this world are wiser" (that
+is, more earnest, consistent, and thorough-going)
+"in their generation than the children
+of light"?</p>
+
+<p>It is of extreme difficulty to <i>understand</i> the
+clause, says Mr. Ruskin. Replies some slow-witted
+preacher: "Where is the difficulty?
+I both understand it and explain it with perfect
+ease!" What! understand the precious
+conditions on which forgiveness will be extended
+to us! The question of God's forgiveness
+is not a <i>simple</i> question. It is complicated
+by its relation to men's mutual forgiveness
+of each other, and that again by the practical
+difficulty of knowing when we can, and when,
+from the very nature of the case, we cannot,
+forgive. Here are surely elements of difficulty
+quite sufficient to justify the remark that "the
+clause is one of such difficulty that, to understand
+it, means almost to know the love of
+God which passeth knowledge."</p>
+
+<p>But we may, at any rate, guard our people
+against <i>misunderstanding</i> it; and they are
+guilty, and full of guilt, who live in sin,&mdash;sins
+of avarice, of ill temper, of calumny, of
+hatred, of sensuality, and of unforgivingness,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">117</a></span>
+and yet daily ask to be forgiven, because,
+forsooth, they are innocent of any bad
+intention!</p>
+
+<p>No man or woman who sins with the knowledge
+that it <i>is</i> sin can have God's forgiveness.
+It is no use to plead the frailty of the flesh.
+It is wilful, knowing, deliberate sin; and it
+will not be forgiven without a very living,
+earnest, and working faith indeed.</p>
+
+<p>I question much whether we preachers of
+the Gospel say enough upon this point,&mdash;not
+at all that we underrate its importance,
+nor that we overrate the importance of that
+which we are apt to call Gospel preaching
+<span class="grk" title="kat' exochĂªn">κατ' á¼Î¾Î¿Ï‡á½µÎ½</span>, namely, the doctrine of the atonement
+by the Blood of Christ, which is the
+brightness and glory of the Gospel message,
+but is no more all of it than that the sum of
+the Lord's Prayer is contained in one of its
+clauses.</p>
+
+<p>"As we forgive them that trespass against
+us." Shall I be pardoned for venturing here
+upon a remark which seems needful to make
+in the presence of so much that appears to be
+erroneous on the subject of human forgiveness?
+And it is more especially necessary to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">118</a></span>
+be understood in the case of the clergy, because
+such large demands are made upon
+their forgiveness as it is impossible to satisfy.
+I do not at all say that there are trespasses
+which men cannot forgive,&mdash;sins, I mean, of
+the ordinary type, and not crimes. But I do
+say that there are times and circumstances
+under which forgiveness is a moral impossibility.
+And yet the world expects a clergyman
+to be ever walking up and down in
+society with forgiveness on his lips and forgiveness
+in both his hands. Our Lord said,
+"If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke
+him; and <i>if he repent</i>, forgive him" (Luke
+xvii. 3); and forgiveness is to follow each
+successive profession of repentance. And in
+Matt. xviii. 22, though repentance is not
+named, it is manifestly implied. In 2 Cor.
+ii. 7, again, sorrow for the sin is a condition
+of forgiveness. This, then, is the rule and
+condition of forgiveness, that our brother
+<i>repent</i>; and manifestly it must be so; for the
+act of forgiveness requires a correlative disposition
+to seek and receive forgiveness, just
+as a gift implies not only a giver but a
+receiver, or it cannot be a gift, do what we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">119</a></span>
+will. I think this is extremely apt to be
+overlooked even by the larger, that is, the
+more emotional and impulsive part of the
+world, though not, of course, by the more
+thoughtful; and clergymen especially are asked
+to speak fair, and sue for peace, and all but
+ask for forgiveness of those who are habitually
+and obstinately bent upon doing them
+all the wrong and injury in their power,
+and using them with the most intolerable
+harshness.</p>
+
+<p>What, then, does true religion require of
+us if such circumstances make forgiveness
+impossible? To be ever ready, ever prepared
+to forgive; to seek every opening, every
+avenue to peace without sacrifice of self-respect
+and manly independence; to watch
+for opportunities to do kindnesses to the
+most inveterate enemy,&mdash;even where a change
+of heart appears hopeless. This is possible
+to a Christian, and this is what Christ
+demands. But He does not demand impossibilities.
+He does not ask us to do more
+than our Heavenly Father Himself, who forgives
+the returning sinner even "a great
+way off," if his face be but homeward; but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">120</a></span>
+says nothing of forgiveness to him whose back
+is towards his home, and whose heart dwells
+far away.</p>
+
+<p>I am sure Mr. Ruskin does not mean that
+no clergyman is sensible of the guilt of sins
+of omission. But he is speaking as a layman,
+who has heard in his time a great many
+preachers, and it is very probable indeed that
+he has not heard many dwell long and forcibly
+on the fact, which is indeed a fact, that
+the guilt of sins of omission is the burden of
+Christ's teaching, and that more parables and
+more preaching are directed against the sin
+of doing nothing at all than against the positive
+and active wickedness of bad men. If
+we will be candid, we must agree with him
+that in our general teaching we do lay much
+less emphasis on such sins than our Lord
+does in <i>His</i> teaching.</p>
+
+<p>But in the paragraph which follows, I confess
+that, following up a charge which is sadly
+too true, that there is a grotesque inconsistency
+"in the willingness of human nature
+to be taxed with any quantity of sins in the
+gross, and its resentment at the insinuation
+of having committed the smallest parcel of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">121</a></span>
+them in detail," there comes a sentence in
+which the Christian philosopher loses himself
+in the caustic satirist, and that this vein
+continues to the end of the letter. In satire,
+such is its very essence, truth is ever travestied.
+It is truth still, but the truth in
+unfamiliar, and, for the most part, unacceptable
+guise. There is just an undercurrent of
+truth, and no more, in the statement, not very
+seriously made, one would suppose, that the
+English Liturgy was "drawn up with the
+amiable intention of making religion as pleasant
+as possible, to a people desirous of saving
+their souls with no great degree of personal
+inconvenience."</p>
+
+<p>If the whole naked truth were spoken with
+the deepest gravity that the awful pressure of
+our sins demands, the English Liturgy would
+be a continuous wail of grief and repentance.
+For if anything is great, and loud, and urgent,
+it is the cry of our sins. But co-extensive
+with our sins is the love of our Father; and,
+therefore, our mourning is changed into rejoicing
+and thankfulness, and this picture of
+the sinner "dexterously concealing the manner
+of his sin from man, and triumphantly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">122</a></span>
+confessing the quantity of it to God," is merely
+a satire.</p>
+
+<p>The next paragraph is more bitter still; but
+happily for the cause of sober truth, it is
+satire again; and nothing can be more obvious
+than the fact that prayer, to be Common
+Prayer, cannot at the same time suit every
+condition of mind, the calm and the agitated,
+the strained and the relaxed, the rejoicing and
+the sorrowful. But we are not dependent
+upon public worship for the satisfaction of
+our spiritual wants, as long as we can resort
+to private prayer and family prayer. And,
+indeed, it requires no wonderful stretch of
+our powers of adaptation to use the most
+strenuous private prayer in the midst of the
+congregation; and the "remorseful publican"
+and the "timid sinner" are not bound to the
+words before them, or if they do follow these
+words, I am sure there is enough depth in
+them to satisfy the views of the most conscience-stricken.
+Common Prayer is calm to
+the calm, and passionate to the passionate.
+It is all things to all men, just according to
+their frame of mind at the time.</p>
+
+<p>But alas for my good kind friend! as we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">123</a></span>
+get nearer to the end of the letter, the satire
+waxes fiercer, and the adherence to the truth
+of nature grows fainter. Does Mr. Ruskin
+seriously, or only sarcastically, tell us that the
+assaults upon the divine power of prayer gain
+any force from the circumstance that we are
+constrained to pray daily for forgiveness, never
+getting so far as to need it no longer? From
+the first day that we lisped at our mother's
+knee, "Forgive us our trespasses," until, bowed
+with age, we <i>still</i> say, "Forgive us our trespasses,"
+we have never stood, and never will
+stand, one day less in need of forgiveness
+than another day&mdash;or our Lord would have
+provided a thanksgiving and a prayer for the
+perfected.</p>
+
+<p>I believe everywhere else I recognize, even
+in the most startling passages, an element of
+truth. But in the latter half of this letter,
+not even the large amount of acrimony and
+severity allowed to the mode of address called
+satire can quite reconcile us to its marvellous
+asperity.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">124</a></span></p>
+
+<p>
+<span class="sidelink"><a href="#XI">Letter XI</a></span>
+</p>
+
+<h4>On Letter XI</h4>
+
+<p>I cannot but feel astonished and grieved at
+the perversity of those who<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> persist in looking
+upon Mr. Ruskin as altogether a noxious
+kind of a scribbler, and likely to do much
+injury by the unflagging constancy with which
+he perseveres in pointing his finger at all our
+weak and sore places. And yet it cannot
+be said that even if he does "lade men with
+burdens grievous to be borne," he himself
+"touches not the burdens with one of his
+fingers."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum">
+<a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">125</a></span>But let us consider this last letter. Is not
+every word of it true&mdash;severely and austerely
+true,&mdash;but still true? But yet here still the
+fault remains (though I say it with the utmost
+deference, remembering that, after all, I have
+infinitely more to learn than I have to teach),
+the fault remains that the truth is put too
+keenly, too incisively, to be classed with practical
+truths.</p>
+
+<p>Yes, the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are
+for a perfect state in this life. We do pray
+for a Paradise upon earth, where either temptation
+shall no longer exist, or where sin shall
+have lost its power to injure by losing its
+power to allure. But will the most incessant
+prayer, individual, combined, or congregational,
+ever bring us to perfection? Alas! my friend,
+you would gladly persuade us so; you would
+lead the way yourself, but that the first half-dozen
+steps you take would have, or have
+long ago, proved to you that sin is ever present,
+even in the best and purest of men.</p>
+
+<p>I trust they are very few indeed who are
+so easily persuaded by the conceited self-sufficiency
+of the "scientific people" to cease from
+prayer under the belief that all things move<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">126</a></span>
+on under the control of inflexible laws, which
+neither prayer nor the will of God, if God has
+a will, can change or modify. Magee<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> has a
+valuable note on the subject of the "Consistency
+of Prayer with the Divine Immutability,"
+in which he puts this truth in a
+mathematical form. He says, "The relation
+of God to man + prayer is different from the
+relation of God to man &ndash; prayer. Yet God
+remains constant. It is man who is the better
+or the worse for prayer or no prayer."</p>
+
+
+<p>It is pleasant to reflect that with the simple-minded
+Christian the belief in Christ, because
+he knows that Christ loved him and died for
+him, is exceedingly little moved by these so-called
+scientific doubts. The propounders of
+these entangling questions move in a region
+where he would feel cold and his life would be
+crushed out of him, and he declines to follow
+science at so great a cost, believing besides
+that science might often be better termed
+nescience, for he has no faith in such science.
+Instead of being presented with clear deductions,
+drawn from observation and experience,
+he sees but too plainly that, as each<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">127</a></span>
+philosopher frames his own belief out of his
+inner consciousness, there cannot fail to come
+out a very large variety of beliefs, and that, if
+the religion of the Bible were exploded and
+became an obsolete thing, its place would
+be usurped by a motley crowd of infinitely
+varied creeds of every shape and hue, each
+claiming for itself, with more or less modesty
+and reserve, but with just equal rights, the
+supremacy over men's consciences. And in
+the meanwhile, women and children and the
+poor, and in fact all who are not altogether
+highly, transcendentally intellectual, must, for
+want of the requisite faculties and opportunities,
+do without any religion at all. I
+suppose most people can see this, and therefore
+will pay a very limited attention to the
+claims and pretensions of science-worship.</p>
+
+<p>I come to a sentence where once more the
+proclivity for satire breaks out for a minute:
+"But in modern days the first aim of all
+Christians is to place their children in circumstances
+where the temptations (which they are
+apt to call opportunities) may be as great and
+as many as possible; where the sight and
+promise of 'all these things' in Satan's gift<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">128</a></span>
+may be brilliantly near." I was reading this
+from the MS. to a mother, accomplished and
+amiable, who of course thought in a moment
+of her own little flock of sons and daughters,
+all the objects of the tenderest care and solicitude;
+and she felt that she at least had not
+deserved this stroke. But the truth is that
+we must read this sentence as we read our
+Lord's, "Think not that I am come to send
+peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but
+a sword" (Matt. x. 34). The sword was not
+the object of our Lord's coming, but the unhappy
+result through sin. He came to bring
+peace on earth, yet was He "set for the fall
+of many in Israel." The wisest and best of
+parents place their sons in the profession or
+position in life where temptations abound, not
+because they desire to see them bow before
+Satan, and become the possessors of "all
+these things" which he promises "I will give
+thee," but because there is no position in the
+active life of the world that is free from
+temptations; and those temptations are the
+strongest and most numerous often just where
+the real and undoubted advantages are the
+greatest and most numerous. Mr. Ruskin,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">129</a></span>
+with a strong and legitimate figure of speech,
+is simply putting an inevitable result as the
+work of apparent design.</p>
+
+<p>If the distinction between the glory and the
+power of the kingdom of God and the false
+lustre of earthly power and worldly allurements
+is not sufficiently dwelt upon in our
+pulpits, none will regret it more than the
+earnest preachers in whom the modern Church
+of England abounds. If it be granted, as I
+think it must be granted, that the highest
+wisdom is not always exercised in the choice
+and preparation of our subjects of preaching,
+every true-hearted and loyal Churchman must
+be grateful for the fearless candour of the
+writer of the letters we have been considering,
+in pointing out to us our prevailing deficiencies,
+even if he does not, which is not his province,
+point out how to attain perfection.</p>
+
+<div class="smcapright">F. A. Malleson.</div>
+
+<div class="footfirst"><p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9">[9]</a> No. IV.</p></div>
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10">[10]</a> "Deucalion," p. 222.</p></div>
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11">[11]</a> The clergyman who subscribes still whispers to himself,
+or soon will, "Nullius addictus jurare in verba magistri."</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12">[12]</a> Let me say here, once for all, that I have already three
+times had this proverb quoted against Mr. Ruskin; and no
+proverb could be more remote from the purpose. For while
+it is the shoemaker's business, <i>as a livelihood</i>, to make shoes,
+a painter's to paint pictures, the merchant's to sell goods,
+and perhaps Mr. Ruskin's to write books which every one
+reads, <i>religion is everybody's business</i>. Christian men and
+women, of all classes and professions, make the Bible their
+study, because of its inestimable importance; and who shall
+say that they are not absolutely right? For my part I should
+be very glad to hear that my bootmaker was a religious
+man: his boots would be none the worse for it. I hope the
+<i>sutor</i> will be brought in no more, unless he can appear with
+a better grace.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13">[13]</a> "Christian Year," St. Bartholomew's Day, with quotations
+from Miller's Bampton Lectures.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14">[14]</a> "Sesame and Lilies," p. iii., 1876.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15">[15]</a> As these sheets are passing through the press, I happen
+to meet with these words of Bishop Wilberforce:&mdash;"The
+more I have thought over the matter, the more it seems to
+me that it was providentially intended that discipline, in the
+strictest sense of that word, should be the restraint of the
+early Church, and that it should gradually die out as the
+Church approached maturity, or rather turn from a formal
+and external rule to an inner work in the spirit&mdash;should run
+into the opening of God's Word and its application to the
+individual soul and life."&mdash;<i>Life</i>,
+vol. i., p. 230.
+</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16">[16]</a> See <i>Contemporary Review</i>, February 1880.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17">[17]</a> The owners of five talents and of two talents are commended
+for making cent. per cent. of their money; but the
+man who hid away his one talent, as French peasants do,
+and brought it to his Lord untouched and undiminished,
+received a severe rebuke.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_18_18">[18]</a> Lycidas.
+See "Sesame and Lilies," p. 27.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote">
+<p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_19_19">[19]</a> It was but yesterday that a
+voice reached me from one
+of the remotest of our Ultima Thules amongst these mountains,
+affirming, with something like self-gratulation, that
+he "cared less than nothing for anything Mr. Ruskin might
+write outside the subject of Art!" Yet one of the best of
+our Bishops&mdash;and we have many good ones&mdash;wrote by the
+same post: "Mr. Ruskin's letters are full of suggestive
+thoughts, and must do anyone good, if only in getting one
+out of the ruts." But, alas! against this I must needs set
+the dictum of another dignitary of the Church, an intensely
+practical man: "I have a great reverence for Mr. Ruskin's
+genius, and for what he has written in time past, and on
+this account I would rather not say a single word in comment
+upon these letters;" and again&mdash;"I really could not
+discuss them seriously."
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20">[20]</a> On the Atonement.</p></div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">131</a></span></p>
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#CONTENTS">ToC</a></span></p>
+
+<h2><a name="LETTERS_FROM_CLERGY" id="LETTERS_FROM_CLERGY"></a>LETTERS FROM CLERGY
+AND LAITY</h2>
+
+<h5>(FROM THE FIRST EDITION)</h5>
+
+
+<p>The following letters have been entrusted
+to me for publication in this
+work. The writers of twenty-two of
+them are clergymen, of whom sixteen
+are members of three Clerical Societies,
+all of whom have read their letters before
+the Societies to which they belong, except
+in the case of one Society, where it
+was impracticable. The remaining six
+have been kind enough to write in acceptance
+of the invitation in the <i>Contemporary
+Review</i> for December, 1879.
+The remaining letters are from members<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">134</a></span>
+of the laity, attracted by the same proposal.
+Many others have been received;
+but it would not have been possible to
+include them all in a volume of moderate
+size, some of them besides being of
+great length; and I was therefore, with
+regret, obliged to decline them.</p>
+
+<p>It was not originally intended that
+the invitation to discuss these questions
+should be extended to laymen. But
+several so understood it from the preface
+in the <i>Contemporary</i>, and when I
+came to examine the letters sent on this
+understanding, I felt a conviction that
+a true and safe light would be thrown
+upon the subject by their assistance; and,
+using the discretionary power allowed
+me by Mr. Ruskin, I thought it, on the
+whole, best to give admission to a
+certain number of communications from
+laymen.</p>
+
+<p>Besides, as they themselves are, in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">135</a></span>
+great measure, the subjects of the discussion,
+and, therefore, must feel a
+lively interest in it, it seems but fair
+that they too should have a voice in
+the matter. Another reason yet had
+considerable weight with me, that their
+letters evince a larger and more liberal
+sympathy with Mr. Ruskin himself
+than those of some of my clerical
+brethren, in whose letters there is but
+too perceptible a degree of irascibility,
+not unnatural to us, perhaps, in finding
+ourselves rather sharply lectured by a
+layman&mdash;the shepherds by the sheep.
+And I hoped that a more fraternal
+spirit would be promoted by my free
+acceptance of their ready offer.</p>
+
+<p>The same consenting spirit is all but
+universal in the notices of the press
+upon Mr. Ruskin's letters. But I do
+not wish to anticipate the judgment
+of "the Church and the world" upon<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">136</a></span>
+the whole series of letters here presented.
+Notwithstanding the peculiar
+and sometimes rather bewildering effect
+of a variety of "cross lights," they
+appear to myself to be invested with
+singular interest as a faithful reflection
+of the opinions of the clergy and the
+laity upon some of the most stirring
+religious questions of the day.</p>
+
+<p>Moreover, it will, I am sure, please
+readers who have endeavoured in vain
+to extract some meaning out of many
+of the sometimes tedious and unintelligible
+essayists of the day, to observe
+that the discussion in this volume at
+least is carried on in language perfectly
+clear and within the reach of ordinary
+understandings. At any rate, I hope
+it will not be said of any of the writers
+who have together made up this little
+volume: "Who is this that darkeneth
+counsel by words without knowledge?"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">137</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Before the sheets are sent to press
+they will be perused by Mr. Ruskin,
+who will then use his privilege of replying,
+thus bringing the volume to a
+conclusion.</p>
+
+<p>I could not undertake to classify these
+letters; and have, therefore, as the
+simplest mode, arranged them in the
+alphabetical order of the writers' names.</p>
+
+<div class="smcapright">F. A. Malleson.</div>
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_Charles_Bigg_DD_Rector_of" id="From_the_Rev_Charles_Bigg_DD_Rector_of"></a><i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">Charles Bigg, D.D.</span>, <i>Rector of
+Fenny Compton</i>.</h4>
+
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin compares the clergyman with
+an Alpine guide, whose business it is simply
+to carry the traveller in safety over rocks and
+glaciers to the mountain top. He is not to
+trouble himself or his charge with needless
+refinements of doctrine. He is not to exaggerate
+the dignity of his office, or to give
+himself out as anything but a guide. In
+particular, he is not to assume anything of a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">138</a></span>
+mediatorial character. He is to preach the
+Gospel&mdash;not of Luther nor of Augustine, but
+of Christ; in plain words and short terms.
+He is to proclaim aloud, boldly and constantly,
+"This is the will of the Lord,"&mdash;to apply, that
+is, the morality of the Gospel, stringently and
+authoritatively, to the lives of his people. To
+effect this application with more power, he
+is to exercise a rigid discipline, and exclude
+from his congregation all who are not acting
+up to what he conceives to be the Gospel
+ideal. He is not to hamper himself with any
+set and formal Liturgy, which can never be
+copious or flexible enough to meet the varied
+needs of a number of men differing widely in
+knowledge and attainment.</p>
+
+<p>Every one will feel what a crowd of perplexities
+start up here at every sentence. In
+what sense is a clergyman like a Chamouni
+guide? There is a resemblance, no doubt,
+but not of a kind on which it would be possible
+to build any argument. It is not the
+business of the Alpine guide to exercise any
+supervision over the morals of his employers,
+or to ask how they earned the money with
+which he is paid. Again, what is meant by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">139</a></span>
+the Gospel of Christ not according to anybody?
+It is easy to reject the authority of
+St. Paul or St. John, or of Luther or Augustine,
+but there is one commentator whose
+influence cannot be shaken off, and that is
+ourselves. And our experience of those who
+have professed to preach the Gospel pure
+and simple is not reassuring. Does Mr.
+Ruskin mean that we are to burn all our
+theology,&mdash;even apparently the Epistles of St.
+Paul,&mdash;and to forget all Church history since
+the day of the Crucifixion? Does he mean
+that we are each to set up a theology&mdash;a
+Church of his own? It would be but a poor
+gain to most of us to exchange the great
+lamps of famous doctors for the uncertain
+rushlights of our own imaginations.</p>
+
+<p>Then again, what is this new and more
+than Genevan discipline that the clergyman
+is to enforce? He is to take more pains to
+get wicked rich men to stay out of the church
+than to persuade wicked poor ones to enter
+it. After putting his own interpretation upon
+the Gospel, he is to lay under an interdict
+all whom his own fire-new formula&mdash;for a
+formula he must still have&mdash;excludes. He is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">140</a></span>
+to force, by the method of Procrustes, the
+visible Church into co-extension with the invisible.
+No community of Christians has ever
+attempted such a task. Any zealous (surely
+over-zealous) parish priest who should so
+narrow the limits of his fold, who should exclude
+the "usurer" from the ordinary means
+of grace, for fear lest he should take God's
+name in vain by joining in the public prayers,
+would expose himself, may we not think?
+to the reproach of being less merciful than
+He who sends rain on the just and the unjust.
+Nor, as he looked round upon his carefully-selected
+congregation, could he easily flatter
+himself that he was preaching the Gospel "to
+every creature."</p>
+
+<p>Again, what is the will of the Lord, and
+what does Mr. Ruskin mean by proclaiming
+it? That He loves righteousness and hates
+iniquity we know. The difficulty is in applying
+this general rule in detail. What is its
+bearing upon the policy of the Government,
+upon any particular trade strike, upon the
+tangled web of good and evil motives which
+makes up the moral consciousness of an
+average shopkeeper? I conceive Mr. Ruskin<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">141</a></span>
+to be thinking of preachers like Bernard,
+Savonarola, or Latimer, of denunciations like
+those of Isaiah, or of our Lord. He seems
+to mean that the clergyman should stand on
+a clear mountain summit, looking down over
+the whole field of life, discerning with the
+eye of a prophet every movement of evil on
+a small scale or on a large. There have
+been such teachers in whose hands science,
+economy, politics, seemed all to become
+branches of theology, members of one great
+body of Divine truth. But not every man's
+lips are thus touched with the coal from the
+altar. Many an excellent and most useful
+preacher would make but wild work if he took
+to denouncing social movements or the spirit
+of the age. A singular illustration of the
+danger that besets these sweeping moral judgments
+is to be found in Mr. Ruskin's own
+denunciation of usury, that is, of taking interest
+for money. Few people will agree
+either with the particular opinion that every
+old lady who lives harmlessly on her railway
+dividends ought to be excommunicated, or
+with the general principle implied in this
+opinion, that every prohibition in the Old<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">142</a></span>
+Testament is still as valid as ever under social
+circumstances altogether different.</p>
+
+<p>People who need denouncing do not, as a
+rule, come to church to be denounced. And
+it would be a great error to conclude, from
+our Lord's language to the Pharisees and
+Sadducees, that the tone in which He addressed
+the individual sinner was harsh or
+scathing. The preacher must remember that
+he is a physician of souls, and the physician's
+touch is gentle. Think for a moment what
+worldliness is&mdash;how easy it is to say bitter
+things about it!&mdash;and then picture to yourselves
+a little tradesman with a wife and seven
+or eight children to keep on his scanty profits.
+What wonder if he sets too high a value on
+money? How difficult for him to understand
+the words which bid him take no thought for
+the morrow!</p>
+
+<p>There is a time, no doubt, for fierce language,
+but it does not often come. The
+preacher is no more exempt than other people
+from the golden rule to put himself in his
+neighbour's place, and try to see things with
+his neighbour's eyes.</p>
+
+<p>Another difficulty arises out of the manner<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">143</a></span>
+in which Mr. Ruskin speaks of the relation
+of his Chamouni guides to dogmatic teaching.
+They ought not, he says, to be compelled to
+hold opinions on the subject, say, of the height
+of the Celestial Mountains, the crevasses which
+go down quickest to the pit, and other cognate
+points of science, differing from, or even contrary
+to, the tenets of the guides of the Church
+of France.</p>
+
+<p>It is difficult in the extreme to know exactly
+what is here meant. No doubt it is needless
+for a guide to drop a plumb-line down every
+crevasse that he has to cross. It would be
+great waste of time to lecture his travellers on
+the laws that regulate the motion of glaciers
+or the dip of the mountain strata. But what
+are the doctrines that stand in this relation,
+or this no-relation, to the spiritual life? Is it
+meant that all theology should be swept away
+like a dusty old cobweb?</p>
+
+<p>I would go myself as far as this, that the
+fewer and simpler the doctrines that a clergyman
+preaches, the better; that all doctrines
+should be required to pass the test of reason
+and conscience, which are also in their degrees
+Divine revelations, so far, at least, as this, that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">144</a></span>
+no doctrine can be admitted which is demonstrably
+repugnant to either one or the other.
+And in the third place, the greatest care should
+be taken to discriminate matters of faith, real
+axioms of religion, from pious opinions or
+venerable practices which have no vital connection
+with the Christian faith; which, to
+use Burke's phrase, all understandings do not
+ratify, and all hearts do not approve. A grave
+responsibility rests upon those who neglect
+this discrimination. It is also a point of the
+highest importance that when most doctrinal
+a clergyman should be least dogmatic; that
+he should remember that all doctrine, by the
+necessity of the case, is cast into an antithetical,
+more or less paradoxical shape; that he
+should never lose sight of the harmony and
+balance between intersecting truths, or of that
+unfortunate tendency of the human mind to
+seize upon and appropriate points of difference
+in their crudest and most antagonistic form, to
+the exclusion of points of agreement; that he
+should always do his best to show the reasonableness
+of the Christian teaching, its analogy
+and harmony with all the works of God; that
+where his knowledge fails, he should frankly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">145</a></span>
+confess that it does fail, and not try to eke it
+out by guesses, or to disguise its insufficiency
+by rhetoric.</p>
+
+<p>But after all these allowances it remains a
+fact that the clergyman is not a guide only,
+but a teacher, an ambassador. He is to teach
+his people all that he knows about God and
+His relation to the soul of man. He is to
+study and meditate himself, and to set forth
+the conclusion he has reached fully and fearlessly.
+And if he discharges this duty reasonably
+and zealously, he need not be afraid
+of finding that there is a gulf fixed between
+doctrine and practice. These two must go
+together. There can be no conduct deserving
+the name without a philosophy of conduct,
+and that philosophy is a sound divinity. Even
+the loftiest and most abstruse doctrines must
+have an influence upon life. It is a common
+remark that scientific truth should be pursued
+for its own sake, and that the most valuable
+practical results have often followed from investigations
+carried out with a single eye to
+the truth. It is an equally common remark
+that those teach the simplest things best
+whose range of knowledge and belief is widest.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">146</a></span>
+We might point to Mr. Ruskin himself as a
+striking illustration of this. What is simpler
+than beauty? what more universally apprehended?
+what at first sight more incapable of
+analysis? Yet as we listen to the great critic,
+what wonderful laws does he point out&mdash;what
+a wealth of knowledge does he bring to bear&mdash;how
+clear he makes it to us that the power
+of feeling (still more the power of creating)
+beauty is the hard-won fruit of labour, study,
+and devotion. So it is with life: those who
+would create a beautiful life must know the
+laws of spiritual beauty,&mdash;and those laws are
+theology.</p>
+
+<p>But criticism is a thankless task. It is a
+more gracious and, towards a great man, a
+more respectful office to note those points on
+which our debt to Mr. Ruskin is acknowledged,
+and our sympathy with him unalloyed. These
+letters are, in spirit at any rate, not unworthy
+of the man who has exercised a deeper and
+wider influence upon the morality of our time
+than any other, except perhaps Thomas Carlyle.
+And the great lesson of each of these
+eloquent teachers is the duty of Reality. There
+are many points in which we do not agree<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">147</a></span>
+with them: let us be all the readier to acknowledge
+the debt that we owe. Both laymen,&mdash;like
+Amos, neither prophets nor sons of
+prophets,&mdash;they have done a work which,
+perhaps, under the altered circumstances of
+society, no professional preacher could have
+achieved. Any one who considers the earnestness
+and reverence of modern intellectual
+literature; the anxious desire even of the
+Agnostic to lay the foundations of his moral
+life as deep as possible; the manifold efforts,
+while denying all religion, yet to maintain the
+union of imagination and reason, without which
+there can be no loftiness of character, no
+nobility of aspiration, yet which nothing but
+religion can consecrate and fructify,&mdash;and
+compares all this with the sneering, self-satisfied
+flippancy of Gibbon and Voltaire,
+will feel how vast is the change for the better;
+and these two writers have been the chief
+instruments in bringing that change about.</p>
+
+<p>Let me notice briefly two points on which
+Mr. Ruskin insists in these letters with great
+force and beauty. The first is the love of
+the Father. No text is more familiar than
+that which tells us that "God is love." It is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">148</a></span>
+not indeed inconsistent with that other text
+which tells us that He is "a consuming fire."
+But if its meaning is fully imbibed and allowed
+to bear its natural fruit, it must result in the
+abandonment of those forensic views of our
+blessed Lord's atonement, which all the
+subtlety of Canon Mozley cannot bring into
+harmony with the dictates of our consciences.
+If the Father is love, there can be no division,
+no antithesis between the Father and the Son.
+If He is love, then the idea of sacrifice, which
+is of the essence of love, must enter into our
+conception of the Father also. I say no more
+about this, because any one who chooses to
+do so may find the Fatherhood of God, and
+all that it implies, treated of with great fulness
+and a marvellous depth of spiritual insight in
+the letters of Erskine of Linlathen.</p>
+
+<p>It can hardly be doubted that the kind of
+language which Protestants of a certain class
+have been, and still are, in the habit of using,
+about the "Scheme of Redemption," constitutes
+a most serious stumbling-block in the way
+of many an earnest spirit. There are few
+preachers probably, and few congregations
+now,&mdash;in the Establishment at any rate,&mdash;who<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">149</a></span>
+would not revolt against the hideous calmness
+with which Jonathan Edwards contemplates
+the "little spiders" dropping off into the
+flames. But a great deal of mischief remains
+to be undone. Those who are acquainted with
+the biographies of Shelley, of James and of
+John Stuart Mill, know well what effect the
+fierce doctrines of Calvinism have produced
+upon minds which for the issues of morality
+and, surely, even of religion, were "finely
+touched." And who can tell what horror and
+indignation have been wrought in some minds,
+what agonies of despair in others, who, when
+at last the blessed work of repentance began
+to stir within them, and they turned their eyes
+for comfort to the cross, were met by the terrible
+warning that none but the select few can
+call God their Father, and that in all probability
+their own eternal tortures were decreed
+before ever they entered the world?</p>
+
+<p>The other point to which I must briefly
+advert is Mr. Ruskin's protest against the use
+of words which imply&mdash;which leave the least
+possibility of hoping for&mdash;a mechanical absolution,
+a pardon of sins that have not been
+abandoned. I do not indeed think that the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">150</a></span>
+reproach of using such language falls upon
+those who are fond of the title of priests alone,
+for the doctrines of Calvinism are far more
+liable to abuse. Nor do I think that any
+preaching of our clergy on this subject can
+be said to have "turned our cities into loathsome
+centres of fornication and covetousness."
+But here, if anywhere, we ought never to
+forget the danger of even seeming to set
+Theology against Reason and Conscience, of
+allowing the least pretext for thinking that a
+mere intellectual assent to abstract truths on
+the one hand, a mere acceptance of ecclesiastical
+ordinances on the other, can wipe away
+sins; or that a heart unpurified by charity
+and obedience, could be at rest even in the
+kingdom of heaven.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_Canon_Cooper_Vicar_of" id="From_the_Rev_Canon_Cooper_Vicar_of"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i>
+<span class="smcap">Canon Cooper</span>, <i>Vicar of
+Grange-over-Sands</i>.</h4>
+
+
+<p>Thank God, all good men are broader and
+better than their creed,&mdash;better and broader,
+I mean, than those parts of their creed
+which they insist upon most, because they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">151</a></span>
+distinguish them from other people. (These
+distinguishing points are always of the least
+importance, in my opinion.) And with my
+experience of sermons for nearly forty years
+(for I was very early "called upon to hear
+sermons"), I am not conscious of such universal
+omissions on the part of the "priests"
+of the Church of England as Mr. Ruskin
+affirms. The universality of the <i>love</i> of God
+the <i>Father</i>, embracing even the "<i>wicked rich</i>"
+as well as the "wicked poor," is largely dwelt
+upon by all "schools."</p>
+
+<p>The kingdom of God <i>in this present sinful
+world</i> is preached and is laboured for. In the
+present, however, it is more correctly described
+as the <i>kingdom of Christ</i>. When "the end
+comes," "He shall deliver up the kingdom
+to God, <i>even the Father</i>" (1 Cor. xv. 24, and
+<i>seqq.</i>) As for denouncing the sins of the
+rich, this is largely done, and especially by
+"lively young ecclesiastics" in great towns.
+And as to preaching forgiveness without
+amendment, no man of common sense can do
+that; but Mr. Ruskin may say that common
+sense is rare among the clergy; and some
+may be afraid to preach morality, because of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">152</a></span>
+an old-fashioned superstition that <i>morality</i> is
+opposed to the <i>Gospel</i>. However, I do not
+hear much of such preaching. As for the
+duty of every man to do something of the
+work of the world for his daily bread, that is
+largely taught; and I believe that the kingdom
+of God is coming in that respect. A great
+deal of the drudgery of the world is done by
+big men now. Also I think that the sinfulness
+of <i>omission</i> is much insisted on by the
+clergy, as it is abundantly noticed in the
+Prayer Book, in accordance with the clear
+teaching of Christ. And the same may be
+said upon the <i>personal guilt</i> of sin. A good
+clergyman never allows his people to shelter
+themselves <i>in a crowd</i>.</p>
+
+<p>I do not feel the force of the taunt about
+our saying every week, "There is no health
+in us," because the most "healthy" Christian
+finds out always fresh failings as his conscience
+grows more healthy (not morbidly
+sensitive), and he is always ready to join in
+the general confession to his dying day.</p>
+
+<p>There is some value in the remark about
+Christian parents putting their children into
+situations where they will be tempted to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">153</a></span>
+worship the devil in order to win the kingdom
+of the world; but here, as elsewhere, the exaggeration,
+for the sake of being forcible, is
+too marked.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_Henry_M_Fletcher" id="From_the_Rev_Henry_M_Fletcher"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">Henry M. Fletcher</span>.</h4>
+
+
+<p>"Yes," I should say, "it is possible to put
+the Gospel of Christ into such plain words
+and short terms as that a plain man may
+understand it, and plain men do understand
+it. And it is not left to be gathered out of
+(any of) the Thirty-nine Articles, which are
+meant not for simple but for clerkly people."</p>
+
+<p>You seem to have felt it startling that Mr.
+Ruskin should ask for a simple and comprehensible
+statement of the Christian Gospel&mdash;at
+least Mr. Ruskin represents the case so.
+What Christ's ministers are bidden to go into
+all the world and preach is&mdash;the good news
+that God has reconciled the world unto Himself
+in Jesus Christ His Son; and that whosoever
+will accept this Jesus as His Lord and
+Saviour shall have eternal life through Him.
+You could not, I think, arrive at a definition<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">154</a></span>
+of what the Gospel of Christ is by explaining
+the terms of the Lord's Prayer.</p>
+
+<p>You must tell first about <i>Jesus</i>, our Lord,
+and what He has done, before child or man
+can have any proper notion of "the Gospel."
+The Gospel is a message from "Our Father
+which is in Heaven," of His love, and of what
+His love&mdash;the love of Father, Son, and Holy
+Ghost&mdash;has devised and executed for the redemption
+and glorification (through sanctification)
+of His rebellious children.</p>
+
+<p>There can be small objection taken to Mr.
+Ruskin's proposal to make the Lord's Prayer
+"a foundation of Gospel teaching, as containing
+what all Christians are agreed upon as
+first to be taught," if the "Gospel teaching"
+is understood to be "teaching the truth to
+<i>Christians</i>." But "the Gospel teaching or
+preaching," which is spoken of by Mr. Ruskin,
+is "Gospel preaching" to the world not yet
+Christian, either Jewish or heathen; and the
+Lord's Prayer cannot properly be taken as a
+foundation of Gospel teaching to it. It must
+be told first of Jesus and His work, and must
+have owned Him "Lord," before it can rightly
+be taught from <i>His</i> prayer. This prayer can<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">155</a></span>
+have no <i>authority</i> but to those who have
+become His disciples. Those who are already
+His disciples learn naturally from Him their
+relation and their duty to His Father and
+their Father. St. Paul, in preaching to the
+Athenians, dwells not on the Fatherhood <i>of
+God</i>, but on the need of repentance as a preparation
+for the judgment which awaits all.
+"Jesus and the Resurrection" was what they
+heard of first from this model preacher.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_A_T_Davidson" id="From_the_Rev_A_T_Davidson"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">A. T. Davidson</span>.</h4>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My Dear Sir</span>,&mdash;Permit me to say one thing
+with regard to the correspondence which has
+passed between Mr. Ruskin and yourself.</p>
+
+<p>Profitable as it is to listen to Mr. Ruskin,
+the student of Mr. Maurice's writings will
+merely find in these remarkable letters an
+additional plea on behalf of those truths for
+which Mr. Maurice so bravely and so passionately
+contended. It is most refreshing to
+find two such teachers in accord; and probably
+there will be many who will learn from
+Mr. Ruskin what they never would have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">156</a></span>
+learnt, or even sought for, from Mr. Maurice.
+It is, of course, for the truth, and not for his
+individual statement of it, that Mr. Ruskin,
+even as Mr. Maurice did, contends. It will,
+I am sure, be a matter of small moment to
+him so long as the truth be sought for,
+whether it be arrived at by means of these
+letters, or by means of Mr. Maurice's books
+on "The Lord's Prayer," "The Prayer Book,"
+and "The Commandments."</p>
+
+<p>Believe me, my dear Sir, to be yours
+faithfully.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_Edward_Geoghegan" id="From_the_Rev_Edward_Geoghegan"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">Edward Geoghegan</span>.</h4>
+
+
+
+<div class="smcapright">Bardsea Vicarage, Ulverston.</div>
+
+
+<p>"Open rebuke is better than secret love.
+Faithful are the wounds of a friend. Let
+the righteous smite me, it shall be a kindness:
+and let him reprove me, it shall be
+an excellent oil, which shall not break my
+head."</p>
+
+<p>It is in the spirit which is expressed in
+these words that I desire to offer the following
+notes on Mr. Ruskin's Letters. Among the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">157</a></span>
+charges which he brings against the clergy
+are the following:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>That we have no clear idea of our calling,
+or of the Gospel of Christ (Letters <a href="#III">III.</a>
+and <a href="#IV">IV.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we profane the name of God in the
+pulpit (<a href="#VI">Letter VI.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we teach that every one that doeth
+evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and He
+delighteth in them (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we hold our office to be that, not of
+showing men how to do their Father's will on
+earth, but how to get to heaven without doing
+any of it either here or there (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we neither profess to understand what
+the will of the Lord is, nor to teach anybody
+else to do it (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we pretend to absolve the sinner from
+his punishment, instead of purging him from
+his sin (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we patronize and encourage all the
+iniquity of the world by steadily preaching
+away the penalties of it (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we gather, each into himself, the
+curious dual power and Janus-faced majesty
+in mischief of the prophet that prophesies<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">158</a></span>
+falsely, and the priest that bears rule by his
+means (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we do not exercise discipline by keeping
+wicked people out of church (<a href="#VI">Letter VI.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we do not require each member of our
+flocks to tell us what they do to earn their
+dinners (<a href="#IX">Letter IX.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>That we encourage people in hypocrisy, by
+inviting them to the authorized mockery of a
+confession of sin (<a href="#X">Letter X.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>I cannot examine the evidence which Mr.
+Ruskin possesses in support of these charges,
+as he has not produced it in these Letters.
+Neither can I attempt to refute the accusations.
+To prove a negative is always difficult;
+it becomes an impossible task when the indictment
+is laid not against any individuals
+mentioned by name, but against a whole order.
+I will only observe, that even if all these
+charges be true, the people of England are
+not in such evil case as Mr. Ruskin fancies.
+The laity of England possess the inestimable
+advantage of not being dependent on the
+sermons of their clergy for either doctrine,
+or correction, or instruction in righteousness.
+Even though a clergyman should never utter<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">159</a></span>
+certain doctrines of Christ from the pulpit,
+or reprove certain sins, he is obliged to do
+so at the font, at the lectern, and at the altar.
+Although from the pulpits of the fifty hundreds
+of clergy whom Mr. Ruskin heard, he
+never heard so much as <i>one</i> clergyman heartily
+proclaiming that no covetous person, which
+is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the
+kingdom of God, he must have often heard
+this proclamation from the altar, in the epistle
+for the third Sunday in Lent, and from the
+lectern whenever the fifth chapter of the
+Epistle to the Ephesians is read for the
+lesson.</p>
+
+<p>Again, if any clergyman teaches from the
+pulpit that for the redemption of the world
+people ought to be thankful, not to the Father,
+but to the Son (<a href="#V">Letter V.</a>), he is obliged to
+publicly contradict his own teaching as often
+as he says the General Thanksgiving, and the
+collects in the Book of Common Prayer.</p>
+
+<p>Again, if any clergyman teaches from the
+pulpit that any one who does evil is good in
+the sight of the Lord, or that there is any
+other salvation except a salvation from sin, he
+is obliged to publicly contradict that teaching<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">160</a></span>
+by everything which he says in the church
+out of the pulpit.</p>
+
+<p>Again, if any clergyman preaches away the
+penalties of sin (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>), he is obliged to
+publicly contradict his preaching every Ash
+Wednesday, when he reads the general sentences
+of God's cursing against impenitent
+sinners.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin asks (<a href="#III">Letter III.</a>), "Can this
+Gospel of Christ be put into such plain words
+and short terms as that a plain man may
+understand it?" I answer that the English
+Church has tried to do this in the Catechism,
+in which every baptized child is taught in
+very simple and plain words the gospel, or
+good news, that God the Father has, in His
+Son Jesus Christ, adopted him or her into
+His family, and therein offers him or her the
+continual help of the Holy Ghost.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin complains that the clergy do
+not teach the people the meaning of the Lord's
+Prayer (<a href="#VI">Letter VI.</a>) He must assume that
+the clergy neglect to teach children the
+Church Catechism, in which is an answer to
+the question, "What desirest thou of God in
+this prayer?" It is an answer which would<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">161</a></span>
+probably satisfy Mr. Ruskin. He would see
+that "Hallowed be Thy name" does not
+merely mean that people ought to abstain from
+bad language. And in the explanation of the
+third commandment, he would see that something
+more is forbidden than letting out a
+round oath (<a href="#VI">Letter VI.</a>)</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin complains that the clergy do
+not prevent the entrance among their congregations
+of persons leading openly wicked lives
+(<a href="#VI">Letter VI.</a>) Before this can be charged on
+the clergy as a sin, he should show that
+they have power and authority to do this.
+In the service for Ash Wednesday he will
+find that the clergy express their desire for
+a restoration of the godly discipline of the
+primitive Church, which Mr. Ruskin also
+desires. But he ought to know that such
+restoration must be the work not of the
+clergy only, but of the whole body of the
+faithful.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin insinuates that the clergy have
+no clear idea of their calling (<a href="#III">Letter III.</a>) If
+this be so, it is certainly not the fault of the
+Church, seeing that the nature of the calling
+of a clergyman is plainly set forth in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">162</a></span>
+Offices for the Ordering of Bishops, Priests,
+and Deacons. But if one may form an opinion
+from many published sermons by English
+clergymen of various schools of thought, and
+from their speeches in Church Congresses and
+elsewhere, and from their pastoral work as
+parish priests, I should be inclined to think
+that they are not quite so ignorant of the
+nature of their calling and of the Gospel of
+Christ as Mr. Ruskin supposes them to be,
+and that of some of the sins, negligences, and
+ignorances which, in these Letters, he lays
+to their charge, they may plead not guilty, or
+at least not proven by Mr. Ruskin.</p>
+
+
+
+
+
+<div class="right"><span class="smcap"><br />Bardsea, Ulverston,</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
+<span class="right"><i>November 3rd</i></span>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;I thank you for
+your letter, which I received this morning.
+Second thoughts are not always the best.
+Your own first thought about the motto which
+I prefixed to my notes was right; your second
+thought was wrong. It never occurred to me
+that anyone could possibly suppose that that
+motto was by me intended to be applied to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">163</a></span>
+myself, inasmuch as in these notes there is
+no "wound" inflicted on Mr. Ruskin, or even
+any "rebuke." On the contrary, I assume
+that he has evidence in support of his charges,
+although he has not produced it. The "rebuke"
+to which I alluded was <i>Mr. Ruskin's</i>
+rebuke. <i>He</i> is the "friend" whose wounds
+are faithful, and whose smitings are a kindness.
+For I have not the least doubt of his
+good-will towards the clergy, or of his earnest
+desire to see them all performing their sacred
+duties with zeal and knowledge. And it was
+as my acknowledgment of this that I prefixed
+the motto. With you I firmly believe that
+the standard which he takes is "lofty and
+Christian," and that it is one towards which
+we ought all of us to aim. The object of my
+notes was to show that the laity of England
+have, in the authorized teaching of the Church,
+a sufficient safeguard against any erroneous
+teaching which they may possibly hear from
+the pulpit or in the private ministrations of
+the clergy, and also a supplement to any
+defective teaching.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Very truly yours,
+<br />
+<span class="signlast2">Edward Geoghegan</span>.</div>
+<p>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">164</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_Joseph_Gilburt_Esq" id="From_Joseph_Gilburt_Esq"></a>
+<i>From</i> <span class="smcap">Joseph Gilburt</span>, Esq.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>Christmas Day</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>The words "Thy will be done" are generally
+coupled with resignation, and very often with
+patience under chastisement. It is always to
+us a sad-coloured sentence, and a sentimental
+illuminator of the Lord's Prayer would in all
+probability make it so. Now, if we think for
+a moment what the state of things would be
+if the will of the Lord were done, we shall see
+it should be the brightest sentence we could
+conceive. God's will is our weal. Aspiration,
+not resignation, is the characteristic of its
+doing. There would certainly be no death,&mdash;that
+is decidedly contrary to His will; and
+by-and-by, when His will is done, there will
+be none. For the present, while His will is
+not yet done, we have the sure and certain
+hope that death will be&mdash;nay, is&mdash;conquered
+by anticipation.</p>
+
+<p>If His will were done, all beautiful things
+would flourish, and all minds would answeringly
+rejoice in them.</p>
+
+<p>Our men of the piercing eye&mdash;Turners,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">165</a></span>
+Hunts, Ruskins, etc.&mdash;show us, till we almost
+worship the state of things in cloud and mountain,
+river and sea, in hedgerow and wayside,
+even in cathedral and campanile, where God's
+will is done, and we are enchanted with their
+beauty. It is God's will that stones should be
+laid truly and carven well, and aptly described.
+And our men of the probe and the lens, the
+scientific openers of nature's secrets, are daily
+demonstrating new beauties in which the will
+of the Lord is done in the formation of bodies
+and working of forces. It is mere truism to
+add to this that the will of the Lord being
+done, none of the ills that are all of them indirectly
+or directly the result of not doing it
+could occur, and resignation would have no
+scope for exercise. There was One who
+always did it, and He for three years made
+sundry parts of Palestine a heaven,&mdash;with what
+results a many quondam poor folk testified.
+This leads me to say that I like to look upon
+the word heaven as a participle instead of a
+noun, as the state of being heaved or raised,
+rather than a place: and for this reason. The
+experience of every one of us suffices to
+prove that we are never so <i>heaven</i>, or raised<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">166</a></span>
+in true happiness, moral dignity, and worth, as
+when we are in the company of one greater,
+wiser, or better than ourselves. Those who
+lead a humdrum life among mean persons,
+can testify what a heaven it is to be transplanted
+for ever so short a time to the company
+of a great and good man. Now the
+culminating, indeed all-absorbing, attraction
+of the heaven we all look to, is the presence
+and the companionship of the greatest and
+best; and the experience of ourselves tallies
+with the promise of St. John that it will
+have the effect of making us "like Him,"
+when "we shall see Him as He is." Surely
+being <i>heaven</i>, or raised like that, is superior
+to any Mahomet's paradise that we can invent
+or distil out of the poetical parts of the
+Scriptures.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_Archer_Gurney" id="From_the_Rev_Archer_Gurney"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">Archer Gurney</span>.</h4>
+
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin's view as to the duty of basing
+all upon the Father's love is essentially sound
+and orthodox; and he is also right in bidding
+all men lead self-denying lives,&mdash;in this sense,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">167</a></span>
+that they should give up time and labour to
+the endeavour to help their brethren; but
+he fails utterly, hopelessly, to realize the Incarnation
+and its glorious consequences, how
+all human life and love,&mdash;how art, science,
+knowledge, enjoyment, are sanctified by God's
+becoming man; sharing this human life of
+ours,&mdash;not to trample upon it as an unholy
+thing, but to consecrate it to God's service.
+Such is our call. We must enjoy the beautiful
+to vindicate enjoyment. We do not
+please God by casting all His choicest gifts
+away. To give all we have to feed the
+poor is the way to make men poor, and is
+false charity. Use rather the mammon of
+this world to God's honour and glory, and
+when ye fail, the good works that you
+have done shall plead for your entrance
+into everlasting habitations; for the way to
+clothe the naked and feed the hungry, permanently,
+is to teach men and women to
+help themselves, and to find employment and
+reward for the exercise of their powers and
+energies.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">168</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_J_H_A_Gibson_Brighton"
+id="From_the_Rev_J_H_A_Gibson_Brighton"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">J. H. A. Gibson</span>,
+<i>Brighton</i>.</h4>
+
+
+<p>To Mr. Ruskin, then, asking us to define
+ourselves as a body, I reply, We are presbyters
+and deacons, deriving our authority
+from the episcopate, who themselves form
+links in that spiritual chain which binds
+both ourselves and them, by perpetual succession,
+in one communion and fellowship, with
+the Apostles, and to whom has been committed
+the office of consecrating and sending forth
+labourers to work in the Lord's vineyard.</p>
+
+<p>But Mr. Ruskin proceeds, "And our business
+as such." Our business as such! Well,
+if we have in any satisfactory manner proved
+our first point&mdash;<i>that</i> is, the authority with which
+we act&mdash;we may fairly say to Mr. Ruskin, "Do
+you put this question, 'What is your business?'
+to your lawyer or doctor?" Does he
+ask the same question of the clergy of any other
+portion of the Catholic Church? We shall not
+wish to insult Mr. Ruskin by attempting to
+explain to him the duties of the priesthood,
+with which, doubtless, he is well acquainted.</p>
+
+<p>But he asks, "Do we look upon ourselves<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">169</a></span>
+as attached to any particular State, and bound
+to the promulgation of any particular tenets?"
+We are undoubtedly attached to the particular
+sphere to the which we are sent by
+those whose office is to provide the various
+parts of God's vineyard with labourers. The
+Anglican Church is the legitimate representative
+of the Catholic Church of Christ in
+England; and we, as clergy of this Church,
+minister for the most part to our countrymen
+at home, and only in other countries as the
+necessities of our colonists and others may
+require. And, as subscribers to the Prayer
+Book and priests of the Church of England,
+we are certainly bound to teach faithfully
+and honestly her doctrines, neither adding to
+them nor taking away from them according
+to our own individual idiosyncrasies.</p>
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_Canon_Gray" id="From_the_Rev_Canon_Gray"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">Canon Gray</span>.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="right"><span class="smcap">Wolsingham</span>,
+<i>October 13th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Penrhyn</span>,&mdash;Will you please to
+thank Mr. Malleson on my behalf for the
+Letters on the Lord's Prayer? I have ever<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">170</a></span>
+admired Ruskin, and learn much even when
+I most differ from him. But if I had the good
+fortune to be with you to-morrow, I fear that
+I should constantly be demurring to his teaching,&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>
+(<a href="#III">Letter III.</a>) his supposition that
+the Thirty-nine Articles were meant to include
+a summary of the Gospel; (<a href="#V">Letter V.</a>)
+his belief that there is need now to warn men
+against being thankful not to the Father but
+only to the Son,&mdash;a remnant of the teaching
+of his youth; (<a href="#Page_20">p. 20</a>) his hard way of speaking
+as to the Son of Man, Whose human soul, as
+that of perfect man, received its knowledge in
+steps according to His own will as perfect
+God; (<a href="#VII">Letter VII.</a>) his confused distinction
+between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom
+of Christ (see Eph. v. 5 in the Greek, and
+remember "<i>tradendo tenet</i>" on 1 Cor. xv. 24);
+his belief that because no one knoweth the
+hour of Christ's coming, it cannot be hastened
+by prayer; (<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a>) his seeming identification
+of claiming interest from a poor man
+who is in need and necessity, and from a railway
+company who borrow money to make
+more,&mdash;speaking, as far as I can see, of money
+as if it had no market value like other things;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">171</a></span>
+(<a href="#X">Letter X.</a>) the belief that we clergy are not
+awake to the guilt of sins of omission; (<a href="#X">Letter
+X.</a>) the inability to see that the nearer and
+nearer by God's grace we come, in answer
+to prayer, to purity and holiness, the more we
+<i>realize</i> our distance from them; and that his
+objection to our Liturgy might be adapted into
+one against the Lord's Prayer, in which we
+pray daily for forgiveness of sins, and deliverance
+from evil, showing that we never shall
+be so delivered as no longer to need forgiveness;
+(<a href="#XI">Letter XI.</a>) the supposition that any
+one state of life is necessarily more full of
+temptations than another, as though the fruit
+of a tree were not to Eve what the glory of
+the world was to the Son of Man, at least in
+the eye of the Tempter.</p>
+
+<p>I am ashamed to jot down thus obscurely
+the points on which I should have liked to
+speak, and I know that our brethren can fully
+deal with them. On the other hand (<a href="#VIII">Letter
+VIII.</a>) there is much to move us, and lead to
+searchings of heart. As to the timidity and
+coldness with which the Church is attacking
+the crying sins of our day, one often feels
+how we need some among us to speak as the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">172</a></span>
+prophets did to the men of their generation,
+and we may be thankful to have our shortcomings
+brought home to us by words like
+Ruskin's.</p>
+
+<p>I wish I were not writing so hurriedly.</p>
+
+<p>Remember me most affectionately to all my
+old and true friends who are with you to-morrow.</p>
+
+
+<p>[<span class="smcap">Note.</span>&mdash;<i>March 12th</i> 1880:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Malleson has kindly brought this letter
+of mine again before me. Hasty and concise
+as it was, I have no wish to expand it, as Mr.
+Ruskin's Letters are now <i>publici juris</i>, and in
+the hands of many a critic, who will rejoice
+to deal with them according to his wisdom. I
+should be thankful, however, for leave to add
+a few words on one point. I cannot help
+having misgivings as to whether I was right
+in demurring without hesitation to "the supposition
+that one state of life is necessarily
+more free from temptations than another," for
+I well know that in favour of such a supposition
+there is a strong <i>consensus</i> of just men.
+I am, however, one of those who believe that
+the shorter Beatitude, "Blessed be ye poor,"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">173</a></span>
+(Luke vi. 20) is explained by the longer,
+"Blessed are the poor in spirit." I see, also,
+that the difficulty with which "they that have
+riches" enter the kingdom of God is reasserted
+with a qualification in the very next verse,
+which speaks of those "who trust in riches"
+(St. Mark x. 23, 24). "Who then can be
+saved?" asked the disciples, who, poor men
+indeed themselves, first heard of this difficulty,
+instinctively perceiving, it may be, that it has
+its root in temptations from which in one shape
+or other no one is free. I read that "the cares
+of this world," as well as "the deceitfulness
+of riches," choke the Word; and I am sure
+that into the number of those "who will be
+rich," or "who are wishing to be rich," and
+so "fall into temptation," a poor man may but
+too easily find his way. I like to remember
+that when "the beggar died," he was carried
+into the bosom of one who had been "very
+rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold;" and I
+think that very deep and far-stretching may
+be the meaning of the words of the wise man,
+"The rich and poor meet together, and the
+Lord is the Maker of them all."]<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">174</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_H_N_Grimley_Norton_Rectory"
+id="From_the_Rev_H_N_Grimley_Norton_Rectory"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">H. N. Grimley</span>,
+<i>Norton Rectory,<br />
+Bury St. Edmunds</i>.</h4>
+
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin's Letters have already been
+closely scrutinized. What have seemed to
+be blemishes in them have been commented
+on. They have been spoken of as somewhat
+random utterances&mdash;as utterances such as are
+pardonable in a layman, but would be inexcusable
+in a clergyman who should endeavour
+to instruct his brethren. It has been said of
+them that they manifest a want of knowledge
+of teaching constantly being given from Church
+of England pulpits. It would be quite possible
+for the present paper to be devoted to a
+continuation of the like free criticism of the
+Letters. I might ask, for instance, whether
+Mr. Ruskin, after (in <a href="#V">Letter V.</a>) speaking with
+condemnation of a plan of salvation which sets
+forth the Divine Son as appeasing the wrath
+of the Father in heaven, does not himself give
+expression to words, as to the love of the
+Father, which almost imply that in his estimation
+the Divine mind is not in unity in
+itself? I might further ask for Mr. Ruskin
+to put more definiteness into his remarks on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">175</a></span>
+usury, and to particularize the special forms of
+that condemnable practice which the clergy
+should boldly denounce. The few hints which
+he throws out on this subject show that to his
+own thoughts there is present an exalted
+socialism. He himself in previous writings,
+while shadowing forth a social system based
+on unselfishness, has carefully deprecated any
+revolutionary attempt to hasten the establishment
+of such a system, and would prefer that
+it should be waited for while it quietly and
+with orderliness evolves itself out of the
+present imperfect order of things. Is it not so
+evolving itself? Does not the co-operative
+movement, now steadily advancing, spring out
+of the recognition of the fact that mutual
+welfare is a far more excellent thing to be
+attained than the enrichment of the few at the
+expense of the many? And if, with regard to
+the land question, any readjustment of relations
+is made, will it not be made in the light
+of the same beneficent principle? If, however,
+the clergy were to give heed to Mr. Ruskin's
+words, and at once proceed to the indiscriminate
+excommunication of usurers, would they
+not be initiating a social revolution, altogether<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">176</a></span>
+different from that orderly upgrowth of a
+better state of things which has commended
+itself aforetime to Mr. Ruskin himself? My
+own impression is that I shall be giving voice
+to a wish that will spring up wherever Mr.
+Ruskin's Letters may be read, if I say that
+a clearer, more definite utterance on the usury
+question would be welcomed. The clergy
+everywhere would receive with thankfulness
+any hints as to how they might hasten the
+coming of the day when the Church of Christ
+will no longer embrace within her borders
+the few, with a useless excess of wealth, and
+around them the unhappy many, hopelessly,
+squalidly destitute; along, too, with a vast
+number of toiling teachers, clergy, artists,
+and literary workers, living mostly on the
+verge of pennilessness&mdash;men of whose existence
+Mr. Ruskin has, in earlier writings, expressed
+himself as keenly and sympathetically
+conscious.</p>
+
+<p>But I will not linger on such parts of Mr.
+Ruskin's Letters as may seem to display inconsistency,
+or to need more precision of
+language before they can be practically useful.
+I will proceed to speak of those for which, as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">177</a></span>
+it seems to me, the clergy may unhesitatingly
+be very grateful to Mr. Ruskin for laying them
+before them.</p>
+
+<p>And first, I think we cannot be other than
+thankful to Mr. Ruskin for sounding at the
+outset a note of catholicity. He asks the
+clergy of the English Church (let me say he
+asks us,&mdash;he asks you and me), whether we
+look upon ourselves as the clergy of a mere
+insular Church, or as the clergy of the Church
+Universal. Is the teaching we are continually
+giving utterance to as to the conduct of life in
+harmony with, or different from, the teaching
+of the Christian Churches on the Continent of
+Europe? Mr. Ruskin's tone, in asking these
+questions, is such as implies that it would be
+no satisfaction to him to hear from us that we
+rejoice in considering ourselves as severed
+from the clergy of the Christian Church abroad.
+Indeed, he goes on to assume that we, with
+one consenting voice, admit our fellowship
+with the rest of Christendom&mdash;that we recognize
+as our brothers the clergy of the Church
+of France, and of the Church of Italy, and of
+the Church everywhere.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin thus does not lend the support<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">178</a></span>
+of his name to any useless Protestantism.
+There are senses in which the whole Christian
+Church must ever be a Protestant Church,
+and in which even individual members may
+from time to time raise protesting voices.
+The Church must ever lift up her protest
+against all influences that work in the world
+for evil&mdash;against whatsoever tends to overthrow
+the Christian ideals of individual,
+family, social, national, and international life.
+She must protest against all hindrances, even
+though they may spring up within her own
+borders, which tend to prevent her from
+putting any beneficent impress upon human
+handiwork and upon manifestations of human
+genius. She must protest against the very
+Protestantism in her midst which has served
+to paganize art and to demoralize the drama,
+by banishing both to an outer region of darkness
+which Gospel rays cannot be expected
+to illumine. She must protest vigorously
+against the mischievous Protestantism which
+impoverishes the intellect and chills the affections,
+by causing men to devote the whole
+energies of their lives to protesting against
+systems of thought with which they are very<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">179</a></span>
+imperfectly acquainted, and to maintaining an
+attitude of perpetual suspicion as to others'
+aims and motives. Under the influence of
+such Protestantism as this, many have been
+possessed with the assurance that a vast
+number of the clergy of Christendom live for
+no other end than to conspire against freedom,
+to disseminate falsities, and to work ruin
+amongst human souls. This Protestantism is
+fast ceasing to have any power amongst us;
+still, as it is not quite extinct, it is comforting
+to find that Mr. Ruskin does not attribute it
+to the main body of those whom he addresses.</p>
+
+<p>To me it seems that an habitual protesting
+attitude on the part of those who are called
+upon to be the teachers of the Church implies
+that they have not themselves properly entered
+the temple of Christian truth. He to whom
+Christian doctrine has revealed itself in all its
+wondrous harmony cannot do other than devote
+himself to unfolding to others what is
+ever present to his own mind, so that he may
+aid in building up their thoughts consistently
+and symmetrically, and thus help to establish
+them firmly in the Christian faith.</p>
+
+<p>We may, then, it seems to me, express our<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">180</a></span>
+thankfulness that Mr. Ruskin has spoken,
+though ever so briefly, a word of encouragement
+to the clergy of the English Church
+amongst whom the thought of a future of reunion
+for Christendom has been welcomed.
+Mr. Ruskin is familiar with the practical working
+of the Christian Church in Italy and elsewhere
+on the Continent, and seeing, as he has
+seen, that her influence is exerted towards
+securing an orderly and healthy state of
+social life, he does not give circulation to the
+indiscriminate calumnies which were once wont
+to be uttered, and which were alike at variance
+with the truth and provocative of a mischievous
+severance of Christians from one another.</p>
+
+<p>But we must, I think, be more especially
+grateful to Mr. Ruskin for his calling widespread
+attention to the great Christian doctrine
+of the Fatherhood of God. There is
+especial need for this being uplifted before the
+thoughts of men at the present day, and it is
+being so uplifted. The more it is upheld, the
+more fully will it be discerned. It cannot be
+said that the doctrine is not accepted within
+the English Church. Still, it has not yet
+been received in all its fulness. Amongst the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">181</a></span>
+separatists outside the borders of our Church,
+the doctrine that God is the Father of all
+humanity, and the loving Father too, is rejected
+in two extreme ways. The set of
+"believers" who adopt the one extreme view
+consider that the Lord's Prayer&mdash;so luminous,
+as Mr. Ruskin reminds us, with the thought
+of God's fatherly love&mdash;should be used only
+by the elect, such as themselves, and that
+all others have no right to address God as
+their Father. The other set of so-called
+"believers" considers with a deplorable Pharisaism
+that they have arrived at such a stage
+of perfection as to be beyond the need for
+using words which require them to ask
+every day for forgiveness of their trespasses.
+Why should they ask for such, they
+say, when their trespasses are non-existent?
+If they are children of the Father they are
+not so in the same sense as those who
+conscientiously use the prayer addressed to
+the Father in heaven. I regret that Mr.
+Ruskin's facile pen has betrayed him into
+writing some words with reference to our
+Liturgy which bring him momentarily into
+sympathy with these self-righteous ones who<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">182</a></span>
+have no need to confess that they want more
+health of soul.</p>
+
+<p>But the doctrine of the loving Fatherhood of
+God, as revealed to us in Christ, is one that
+is unfolding itself more and more clearly to
+the Christian world. If it has unfolded itself
+to us we may aid in its increased discernment.
+It is one that involves the acceptance
+of the thought that all human life and every
+sphere of human endeavour are under Divine
+patronage. God is in every way our Father.
+All human excellences whatsoever exist in
+their fulness and perfection in Him. As they
+are manifested in us and in our brothers
+and sisters around us, they are Divine excellences
+becoming incarnate on the realm of
+humanity.</p>
+
+<p>Childhood, for instance, as it manifests its
+sweetness and winsomeness in Christian homes,
+is an outcome of the eternal childhood which
+dwells in God, and which was manifested
+supremely to the world in the life of the
+Divine Child at Bethlehem and Nazareth.</p>
+
+<p>So that the doctrine of the loving Fatherhood
+of God has sheltering beneath it the thought
+of the divineness of childhood. Clustering<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">183</a></span>
+with it are many kindred thoughts. There is
+the divineness of youth, the frankness of
+Christian boyhood, the tender grace of Christian
+girlhood,&mdash;these are manifestations of the
+eternal youth abiding in the Divine Lord of
+humanity.</p>
+
+<p>I might speak to you in like manner of the
+divineness of manhood and of womanhood,
+and of the divineness of old age. All womanly
+excellences, as well as all manly virtues, reside
+in the Divine One. I might speak to you of
+the divineness of wedded life, the divineness
+of Christian fatherliness and motherliness.
+The divineness of the student's life and of the
+teacher's life might also be dwelt upon. The
+divineness of the ministry of reconciliation, in
+which ministry all may take part who help
+others to separate themselves from sin and
+selfishness and to enter into union with God
+and His life of love,&mdash;this I present to you as
+a fruitful thought. The divineness of all efforts
+tending towards the solace and comforting of
+suffering human souls,&mdash;that too is one of
+the beneficent thoughts involved in the great
+Christian truth that God is the Father of
+humanity.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">184</a></span></p>
+
+<p>But the same great truth leads us to the
+discernment of other useful thoughts. I might
+speak of them as connected with the divineness
+of all toil which has for its object the
+increase of human knowledge, the gathering
+together of the stored-up lessons of the past,
+the beautifying of the daily life, the refining
+and spiritualizing of the daily thoughts of the
+great brotherhood and sisterhood. It would
+thus be quite justifiable to speak of the divineness
+of scientific toil, inasmuch as that has for
+its aim the unfolding of the thoughts of God,
+of which all appearances of the material world
+are the outcome and manifestation. Thus too
+I might speak of the divineness of the work
+of those who enable us to see the results of
+the Divine guidance bestowed on the world in
+the ages past. I might speak of the divineness
+of the work of the artist who devotes
+himself to acquiring skill in subtly entangling
+in the colours he puts on canvas the sentiment
+underlying the landscape he reverently looks
+at, which to him is a manifestation of a
+heaven of beauty unseen by heedless eyes. I
+might also speak of the divineness of the
+labours of the Christian poet, who presents<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">185</a></span>
+to the world truth in its feminine and most
+winning aspects.</p>
+
+<p>When I should have spoken of all these
+things they could all be summed up into one
+phrase&mdash;the divineness of Humanity. And
+this is what I have faintly attempted to show
+necessarily springs up for recognition as the
+doctrine of the Fatherhood of God presents
+itself to us in all its impressiveness.</p>
+
+<p>I must hasten to a close. I have said
+that Mr. Ruskin in what he asks us with
+reference to our relation to the Church in
+other countries sounds a note of catholicity.
+In what I have myself said as to Protestantism
+I have urged nothing inconsistent
+with a thorough loyalty to the principle of
+Christian individualism. But individualism
+in utter revolt against authority leads only to
+confusion and to a multiplicity of tyrannies.
+Individualism thrives best under the protection
+of a generous all-embracing authority.
+Individualism before taking up the attitude
+of revolt should consider that it, by brave
+patience and a reverent submissiveness to all
+higher influences around it, may contribute
+beneficently to the authority of the future,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">186</a></span>
+and increase the generousness and catholicity
+of its sway.</p>
+
+<p>I will further remark that Mr. Ruskin's
+words as to the Fatherhood of God are also a
+catholic utterance. For the Fatherhood of God
+when pondered upon helps us to see that no
+sphere of human effort is beyond His control;
+that His house is one of many mansions of
+thought and affection and loving toil; that His
+heavenly kingdom is one including all domains
+on which human energies can be directed, over
+which human thoughts can roam, on which
+human love can lavish itself.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h4><a name="From_the_Rev_Canon_E_H_MNeile_Liverpool"
+id="From_the_Rev_Canon_E_H_MNeile_Liverpool"></a>
+<i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">Canon E. H. M'Neile</span>,
+<i>Liverpool</i>.</h4>
+
+
+<p>What is the exact question asked in <a href="#II">Letter
+II.</a>?</p>
+
+<p>Is it whether the clergy are or are not
+teachers of universal science?</p>
+
+<p>If so, we answer, Yes, we are teachers of
+the science most universal of all, namely, the
+knowledge of God, which is eternal life: and of
+the way to attain it, which is holiness; and the
+principles of this science, which are universal,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">187</a></span>
+are not, as in other sciences, discovered by
+human research, but are revealed by God.</p>
+
+<p>Does the question imply that there are
+points of science on which it is of no consequence
+what opinions a teacher holds? And
+if so, does it further mean that all matters of
+doctrine, such as are defined in the Thirty-nine
+Articles, are of this nature?</p>
+
+<p>If so, I answer that it is only the theories
+or speculations of scientific investigators about
+which variety of opinion is immaterial, not the
+essential principles of the science; and that we
+cannot exclude all questions of doctrine from
+among those principles. I do not know
+what is meant by holding different opinions
+on points of science. About the facts of
+science there can be no difference of opinion;
+but there may be about the bearings, and the
+inferences to be drawn from them.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#III">Letter III</a></div>
+
+<p>Here is a definite question. My answer is,
+Yes, but we do not refer to the Thirty-nine
+Articles for a statement of the Gospel, but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">188</a></span>
+rather to the Apostles' Creed, which contains
+the simplest summary of the facts on which
+the Gospel rests. (See 1 Cor. xv. 1, etc.)</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#IV">Letter IV</a></div>
+
+<p>Here I answer, No. The Lord's Prayer was
+not intended to be a statement of the Gospel,
+but the language of those who have accepted
+it. No doubt the terms of the prayer may
+be so explained as to bring in a definition
+of the Gospel, working backwards; but a
+complete explanation would be longer than
+the Thirty-nine Articles. There seems to be
+a serious confusion of thought here between
+the offer of salvation to sinners estranged
+from God, and the utterance towards God of
+His reconciled children.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#V">Letter V</a></div>
+
+<p>The Lord's Prayer is elementary teaching
+for Christians, but it is not the first thing to
+be taught to those outside the family of God.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">189</a></span>
+The truth that we have a Father in heaven
+is a fundamental part of the Gospel. It is
+assumed in the Lord's Prayer; and so is the
+further truth that our Father of His tender
+love towards us has given His Son to die for
+us, that we may be delivered from the "consuming
+fire" which sin, not God, has kindled;
+and thus we have indeed a blessed scheme of
+pardon for which we are to be thankful to <i>both</i>
+the Father and the Son. This makes <i>all</i> the
+clauses of the apostolic blessing intelligible
+and living.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#VI">Letter VI</a></div>
+
+<p><a href="#For_other">Page 14</a>: "For <i>other</i> sins," etc. I think
+this is an incorrect comment. The force of
+the threat is positive, not comparative. The
+language of the law is similar towards every
+sin.</p>
+
+<p>In what is said about the abomination of
+hypocrisy in prayer we cordially agree. God
+give us grace to avoid it ourselves, and to
+warn our brethren faithfully against it! But
+in what follows there is an assumption of a
+power of discipline which the clergy do not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">190</a></span>
+possess, and which I fear the laity would
+be most unwilling to concede to them.
+Mr. Ruskin seems also to slip into the old
+error of the servants in the parable of the
+tares.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#VII">Letter VII</a></div>
+
+<p>On <a href="#Page_21">page 21</a> St. John xiv. 9 is incorrectly
+cited, and it is difficult to know the exact drift
+of the writer.</p>
+
+<p>I object to the statement that "in all His
+relations to us and commands to us," etc.
+(See, <i>e.g.</i>, St. Matt. xxviii. 18-20.)</p>
+
+<p>As to His not knowing whether His prayer
+could be heard, see St. John xi. 41, 42.</p>
+
+<p>I think it is incorrect to say that our Lord
+Himself <i>used</i> the prayer He gave us, at least
+in its entirety as it stands.</p>
+
+<p>Pages <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>: Mr. Ruskin seems to me to
+draw most strongly the very comparison to
+which he objects. Surely the kingdom of
+Christ <i>is</i> the kingdom of His Father. (Rev.
+xi. 15, xii. 10; Eph. v. 5.) Does not an unwillingness
+to accept the true divinity of our
+Lord underlie this passage?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">191</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#VIII">Letter VIII</a></div>
+
+<p><a href="#Page_25">Page 25</a>: There is surely a mistake here.
+Personal sanctification and national prosperity
+are very different things. A nation has no
+existence except in this world; therefore its
+prosperity is the chief end to be aimed at;
+and this is no doubt promoted by the holiness
+of its people. But a man has another life
+hereafter; and comfort and wealth are not the
+end of his being. If granted, they are means
+to his sanctification, not <i>vice versĂ¢</i>.</p>
+
+<p>It seems to me that Mr. Ruskin in this
+Letter writes somewhat recklessly, and that
+he must have been singularly unfortunate in
+his experience of preachers if he has never
+heard a faithful sermon against covetousness,
+which is the idolatry of our age. On <a href="#Page_26">page 26</a>
+he seems to fall into a great error in supposing
+that the proclamation of a free pardon
+for sin tends to encourage it. If a man is
+to be delivered from the power of his sins,
+he must first be delivered from the guilt of
+them.</p>
+
+<p>No doubt the grace of God has been abused<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">192</a></span>
+by some; and St. Paul himself felt that his
+doctrine was open to such abuse (Rom. vi.
+1, 15). It is not, I think, just to attribute the
+corruption of our great cities to the teaching
+of the clergy. It is rather to be ascribed to
+the absence of that teaching.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#X">Letter X</a></div>
+
+<p>Whatever justice there may be (and no
+doubt there is much) in Mr. Ruskin's accusations
+against us clergy, he is surely under
+an entire misapprehension in the charge which
+he here makes against our Liturgy.</p>
+
+<p>Our Prayer Book is doubtless constructed
+for the use of believing Christians, and is not
+fitted for the impenitent; but its adaptation
+to the needs of the repentant publican and
+of the advanced Christian is most wonderful.
+And that a form of prayer may be so adapted
+is surely proved by the Lord's Prayer itself,
+which Mr. Ruskin says is the <i>first</i> thing to be
+taught to all, and which, with all his practice
+in thinking, he feels that he cannot adequately
+expound.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">193</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Surely the repetition of a confession of unholiness
+casts no slur upon the efficacy of our
+prayers for holiness when we recognize that
+holiness is progressive, and that spiritual
+growth may express itself not merely in new
+words, but in a heartier utterance of the
+old ones. As to the particular expression,
+"there is no health in us," it needs either
+the explanation of St. Paul&mdash;"I know that
+in me, <i>that is, in my flesh</i>, dwelleth no
+good thing,"&mdash;or else to be understood according
+to the old meaning of "health,"
+viz., "<i>saving health</i>," <i>salvation</i>, <i>deliverance</i>
+(Psalm cxix. 123, Prayer Book; Isa. lviii. 8;
+Jer. viii. 15).</p>
+
+<p>It needs further to be remarked that repentance
+is not only a single definite act, but a
+state of mind.</p>
+
+<p>I think that underlying all these comments
+of Mr. Ruskin on the Lord's Prayer is a failure
+to recognize the truth of man's fall.</p>
+
+<p>Human nature is a ruin, not to be restored
+by a rearrangement of its fragments. God
+has provided a remedy, by sending His Son
+to be the foundation of a new spiritual building;
+and every man who is to be built upon<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">194</a></span>
+that foundation must himself become a new
+creature by the operation of the Holy Ghost.
+All efforts to improve humanity in the mass,
+without the renewal of each separate soul,
+must fail; and no doubt the clergy often fall
+into this mistake.</p>
+
+<p>The Lord's Prayer is not the prayer of
+all mankind as they are by nature. It is a
+prayer to the possession of which they are
+brought by regeneration, and to the enjoyment
+by conversion.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapright">E. H. M'Neile.
+</div>
+
+
+<h4><i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">P. T. Ouvry</span>.</h4>
+
+<p>On the meaning of usury, I would add
+a few words. I start with this proposition.
+There is nothing contrary to the will of God
+for one free man to buy from another free
+man anything he wants. I have two houses,&mdash;one
+I live in, one I let. My tenant pays
+the market rent of houses to me, and so both
+parties are benefited. I have two thousand
+pounds. I have no capacity, or opportunity,
+or desire to use more than one thousand
+pounds in trade on my own account. My<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">195</a></span>
+neighbour has energy and activity to use more
+money than he has in trade. He gladly
+offers me five per cent. for my spare thousand
+pounds. I willingly lend it on those terms.
+He makes ten per cent. by using it. He
+gives me five pounds and has five pounds for
+himself. If this be usury, it is lawful and
+right.</p>
+
+<p>A number of small cultivators of land have
+no capital. A money-lender supplies what
+they require on condition that they sell their
+crops to him at a price which he is able to
+fix. From the circumstances of the case the
+money-lender makes an enormous profit. The
+cultivator has barely the necessaries of life.
+This is usury, in the bad sense of the term,
+but is more correctly called oppression or
+extortion.</p>
+
+<p>Again, a man lends money to ignorant inexperienced
+youths, on promise of repayment
+when they come of age. This, too, is oppression
+or extortion.</p>
+
+<p>Similar oppression is witnessed when bad
+houses are let to poor people at high rents.</p>
+
+<p>It is not, then, that usury, in the sense
+of oppression or extortion, is inherent in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">196</a></span>
+money-lending; but it belongs equally to every
+transaction between man and man, where any
+unrighteous dealing is practised.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapright">P. T. Ouvry.</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+<div class="right"><span class="smcap">Grange-over-Sands</span>,<br />
+<i>October 1st</i>, 1879.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;I protested strongly
+yesterday against our remarks, made on the
+spur of the moment, being printed and submitted
+to Mr. Ruskin's criticism, and what I
+said then I feel as strongly still.</p>
+
+<p>But I have no objection to send, as a
+comment on his Letters, a volume of sermons
+which I published last year, because I think
+that, in that upon the hallowing of God's
+name, I have not taken the restricted view
+which Mr. Ruskin accused the clergy of
+taking, and I think also that (except in the
+sermon upon the doctrine of the Trinity,
+which was written before the others, and is
+tinged with the prejudices of early training),
+I have set forth God the Father as a Being
+of infinite, tender, fatherly love.</p>
+
+<p>So far as snails may follow in the footsteps<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">197</a></span>
+of greyhounds, and bats look in the same
+direction as eagles, I think some of us clergymen
+are getting our feet and our eyes into
+the same track as Mr. Ruskin's.</p>
+
+<p>It seems to me that all of us who think
+upon religious matters, laity or clergy, whether
+men of genius or commonplace people, are
+feeling our way at present to something better
+and truer. Men like Mr. Ruskin, like steamships,
+dart on to their destination; and feebler
+minds, like sailing vessels, are a good deal
+at the mercy of the <i>popularis aura</i> and the
+winds of doctrine, but both are on their way
+to the same point.</p>
+
+<p>I send the volume by the same post as this
+letter.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Yours very faithfully,<br />
+<span class = "signlast1">H. R. S.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+<h4><i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">A. G. K. Simpson</span>,
+ <i>Brighton</i>.</h4>
+
+<p>We are convinced that the love of God is
+the originating cause of all His dealings with
+mankind, and are glad to meet him on the
+broad platform of "Our Father which art in
+heaven;" only premising that it is a platform<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">198</a></span>
+not new to us, but on which we have long
+taken our stand.</p>
+
+<p>But beyond these somewhat general statements
+of our faith, I doubt whether it would
+be possible to put Divine truth into such
+plain words as would meet with general
+acceptance. In proportion to the <i>minuteness</i>
+would be the <i>disagreement</i>. To take
+one great truth (perhaps the greatest of
+all), would it be possible to put forth a plain
+and simple statement, such as all, or the
+majority, would receive, of the Atonement?
+Such a mind as Mr. Ruskin's would not be
+content with the forensic view more popular
+some years ago than now. Wiser, it seems
+to me, it is to accept some such teaching
+as that of Coleridge in "Aids to Reflection."
+"The mysterious act, the operative
+cause," he says, "is transcendent." "<i>Factum
+est</i>," and beyond the information contained
+in the enunciation of the fact, it can be characterized
+only by its consequences. It is these
+consequences which (according to Coleridge)
+are illustrated by the four metaphors:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>
+1. Sin-offering or expiation.<br />
+<br />
+2. Reconciliation.<br />
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">199</a></span><br />
+3. Redemption.<br />
+<br />
+4. Payment of a debt.<br />
+</p>
+
+<p>Now, would not a plain, a simple statement,
+be apt to press the metaphor too far, and
+attempt to put into words one aspect of the
+truth as though it were the whole? Such a
+reverent mind as Bishop Butler's reproved
+the curiosity which sought to find out the
+manner of the atonement. "I do not find,"
+he said, "that it is declared in the Scriptures."
+And yet the atonement is only <i>one</i>, though
+perhaps the <i>chief</i>, of the many points of which
+a true and simple statement must take cognizance.
+It would be comparatively easy for
+the private clergyman to put into words his
+thoughts on this subject or that, but then he
+would be continually liable to have it urged
+against him that he had not sufficiently considered
+some given point&mdash;had not walked
+round it, and seen it in all its bearings; that
+his view was inadequate and incomplete;
+and, being fallible and human, some of the
+objections would doubtless be true, and the
+simple and plain statement be, in that respect
+at least, misguiding.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">200</a></span></p>
+
+
+<h4><i>From the Rev.</i> <span class="smcap">G. W. Wall</span>,
+<i>Bickerstaffe.</i></h4>
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#II">Letter II</a></div>
+
+<p>This Letter professes to contain an "exact
+question," which is somewhat singularly inexactly
+put. In its strict grammatical form
+it asks for a definition of the members of a
+Clerical Council, and their business as such.
+This "exact question" is in fact an illustration
+of the fallacy of asking two questions in one,
+though a question demanding to be answered
+with "mathematical" precision should have
+been set with mathematical accuracy. But here
+at the outset a protest must be entered against
+being called upon to answer a question set
+in ambiguous words and misleading phrases,
+and based upon assumptions which those
+questioned would reject. It is impossible to
+deal with a so-called "axiomatic" question
+which instantly passes into a cloudy rhetorical
+illustration.</p>
+
+<p>"The attached servants of a particular
+State." Does that expression mean, "England,
+with all thy faults, I love thee still"? or, is
+it used in the same sense as "attached to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">201</a></span>
+the staff"? But are there many of the
+clergy who would say, "I am an attached and
+salaried servant of the State, and nothing
+more?" Are there many who would allow
+that they were "salaried" by the State at all?
+Are there many who would grant that they
+had been "examined" and "numbered" and
+admitted into a "body of trustworthy persons"
+either by the State or by its agents? And
+yet all these previous questions must be
+answered before we can consider at all the
+"axiomatic" question which the clergy are
+"earnestly called upon" to solve. The question
+set down for solution implies some such
+inquiries as these: Is not the Church of
+England merely a Department of the State
+of England? Does not a clergyman belong
+to the Ecclesiastical Service just as an <i>employé</i>
+of the Treasury, or the Home Office, or the
+Post Office, belongs to the Civil Service?
+For example, the authorities at Chamouni
+examine and approve of certain men as guides
+for mountaineering: does not the English
+State similarly examine and approve of certain
+men as guides for England and the
+English "in the way known of all good men<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">202</a></span>
+that leadeth unto life"? A most fallacious
+employment of a "universal" for a "particular,"
+for either the clergy must be excluded
+from the number of "all good men,"
+or the assertion that all good men agree in
+their knowledge falls to the ground, seeing
+that in the <a href="#IV">fourth Letter</a> the clergy are
+charged with not having "determined quite
+clearly" what the way that leadeth unto
+life may be.</p>
+
+<p>But taking this Alpine illustration for what
+it may be worth, we may ask, "What does
+it mean?" Is it not intended to exalt
+practical questions, and to depreciate all
+doctrine and dogma and theological opinion,
+either from its liability on the one hand to
+be narrow or insular, "Chamounist or Grindelwaldist,"
+or on the other from its tendency
+to be vague and transcendental, dealing
+with "celestial mountains" and unfathomable
+"crevasses"? Will it not admit of
+some such paraphrase as this, "Your teachings
+as to Episcopacy or Congregationalism,
+seven sacraments or two, and the like, are
+mere local opinions, and so away with them;
+your doctrines as to the Holy Trinity, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">203</a></span>
+Incarnation, and the like, are mere transcendentalism,
+and so away with them also,&mdash;</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i0">'For modes of faith let zealous bigots fight,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">He can't be wrong whose life is in the right.'"<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>Still it may be allowable to hint that the
+qualifications of a "guide" as laid down in
+this Letter are somewhat peculiar. It might
+have been supposed by a plain man that a
+Chamounist guide was expected to know at
+least something as to the localities of the
+Mer de Glace, the Jardin, or the Grand
+Mulets, but he is seemingly to rise superior
+to any "Chamounist opinions on geography,"
+and to be prepared to rely only upon a universal
+science of locality and athletics, a
+reliance which has been the fruitful cause
+of mountaineering fatalities.</p>
+
+<p>The reply which most Clerical Councils
+would return respecting the "axiomatic"
+question of this Letter would probably be,
+"We cannot answer a fallacy; we are not
+careful to answer thee in this matter."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">204</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#III">Letter III</a></div>
+
+<p>A second question is now propounded respecting
+the Christian Gospel. "The Gospel
+of Christ" is spoken of in a connection
+which seems to indicate that Luther and
+Augustine were equally, in the writer's
+opinion, the setters forth of a "gospel."
+Is this an unintentional disclosure of his
+estimate of our blessed Lord,&mdash;"Rabbi, we
+know that Thou art a teacher come from
+God," and no more than that? For <a href="#VIII">the
+eighth Letter</a> contains a sneer at the Gospel
+that He is our Advocate with the Father,
+as one to mend the world with. A confused
+question follows, which may mean either,
+that it is in the first place desirable that
+the Gospel should be put into plain words,
+or, that the first principles of the Gospel
+should be put into plain words. Its probable
+meaning is, "Is it not desirable that
+religious teaching should be divested of any
+mysteries?" The extraordinary supposition
+that the Gospel is intended to be set forth
+in the Thirty-nine Articles can only be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">205</a></span>
+equalled by a supposition that a treatise on
+military tactics is embodied in the Articles
+of War. Perhaps even some of the axiomatic
+principles of mathematics, such as that
+"a point is that which hath no parts," though
+laid down in "plain words and short terms,"
+might sorely perplex "simple persons."</p>
+
+<p>But several fallacies underlie this second
+question. The fallacy that the moral principles
+of our nature are necessarily connected
+with the extent of our intellectual capacities;
+the fallacy that Divine Truths can be adequately
+expressed through the inaccurate instrument
+of human language; the fallacy that
+deep things are necessarily made plain by the
+use of plain words; the fallacy that everything
+upon which we act is necessarily understood.
+A plain man does not refuse to use the telegraph
+because he may know nothing about
+the Correlation of Force, or a simple person
+to travel because "space" is beyond his comprehension.
+If the Gospel is, as St. Paul
+says it is, a revelation of the power of God
+unto salvation, an amount of mystery must
+necessarily surround it. Since it is impossible
+that the Divine Nature should be to us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">206</a></span>
+other than a mystery, a revelation of Divine
+purposes such as is the Gospel as understood
+by the Church, must remain mysterious also.
+Only upon the supposition that our Lord was
+the teacher of a high but still human morality
+can we remove all mystery from the Christian
+Gospel, if it still deserve the name. Such
+teaching might be conveyed in plain words
+and short terms, but it would cease to be a
+Gospel which angels desire to look into, and
+could hardly be described as the "manifold
+wisdom of God," or be the story of the "love
+of Christ, which passeth knowledge."</p>
+
+<p>The Gospel, as the Church understands it,
+rests upon the revealed fact of the Incarnation,
+or the union of the Infinite with the
+Finite, that He who is very God of very God
+became man in order to introduce the Divine
+possibility of manhood being made to partake
+of the Divine nature; and so long as the
+triumphal chant ascends that "the Catholic
+Faith is this," so long will the Church's Faith
+be veiled indeed with mystery, and so long
+will she continue to gather within her bounds
+the humble and holy men of heart, who are
+content to say, "I cannot understand: I love."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">207</a></span>
+That "God sent His only-begotten Son into
+the world that we might live through Him"
+are short and plain words enough, and Gospel
+enough, surely, but the depth of their meaning
+is unfathomable by even the most cultivated
+understanding, to which the power of
+God and the wisdom of God may appear to
+be but foolishness.</p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#IX">Letter IX</a></div>
+
+<p>This Letter, after endorsing the expressions
+of the preceding one, deals apparently with
+Capital and Labour. The clergy, if not required
+to divide the inheritance among their
+brethren, or to actually serve tables, are, taking
+"Property is theft" as their text, to resolutely
+and daily inquire how the dinners of their
+flock are earned. The gist of the Letter seems
+to be that the worker earns and the capitalist
+steals his dinner. It is really possible that
+the clergy do constantly speak the truth,
+boldly rebuke vice, and patiently suffer for the
+truth's sake, even though they may not subscribe
+to all the articles of some peculiar<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">208</a></span>
+schemes of social science, nor hold some
+singular doctrines as to political economy.
+Doubtless were they to assimilate their conduct
+to that of an injudicious district-visitor,
+they would have to take a new view of "life
+and its sacraments," whatever this expression
+may mean.</p>
+
+<p>It would seem as if the writer had yet to
+learn that a Christian Church may exist teaching
+the most dogmatic definitions of doctrine,
+binding, even in this respect, burdens on
+men's shoulders grievous to be borne, while
+its members may be patterns of self-denial in
+"offices of temporal ministry to the poor."
+He does not appear to regard with favour the
+"Evangelistic sect of the English Church;" if
+this is intended for the "Evangelical" sect,
+Charles Kingsley could say, in a certain place,
+of its founders, "They were inspired by a
+strange new instinct that God had bidden
+them 'to clothe the hungry and feed the
+naked.'" Yet these men thought that "justification
+by faith only" was the Gospel they
+were "to carry to mend the world with,
+forsooth."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">209</a></span></p>
+
+
+<div class="smcapcent"><a href="#XI">Letter XI</a></div>
+
+<p>This concluding Letter calls but for slight
+remark,&mdash;of many portions we feel <i>O si sic
+omnia</i>! That there is much sorrowful truth
+underlying the unmeasured denunciations
+which have gone before few will care to deny.
+Few there are who will not pray to be kept
+from the evils which the writer discerns, and
+against which he inveighs. Such will be the
+first to regret that the Letters, as they read
+them, seem to fall short of the fulness of the
+Catholic Faith. "The holy teachers of all
+nations:" was our blessed Lord but one of
+them? There is nothing in the Letters to
+show that "the full force and meaning" of
+Gospel teaching is concerned with anything
+beyond wealth, and comfort, and national prosperity,
+and domestic peace. Preaching the
+acceptable year of the Lord is something more
+surely than an invective against usury.</p>
+
+<p>We read that in old times Bezaleel was
+filled for his own work with the Spirit of God,
+but we do not read that he aspired to become
+a religious teacher; and when we are told by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">210</a></span>
+one eminent in Art that a Church nineteen
+centuries old has yet to learn that the "will
+of the Lord" is a sanctification which brings
+comfort and wealth in its train, we think of a
+Moses who esteemed the reproach of Christ
+greater riches than all the treasures of Egypt,
+and then of a Paul who counted all things
+but loss for the excellency of the knowledge
+of Christ Jesus his Lord.</p>
+
+<div class="smcapright">G. W. Wall.</div>
+
+
+<h4><i>From</i> <span class="smcap">Oxoniensis</span>.</h4>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;Many thanks for
+the pamphlet. You ask me to send you any
+remarks I may have to make on the Letters,
+and I gather from your note at the beginning
+of the Letters as they now stand, that you
+intend making use of any remarks sent you
+that may commend themselves to your judgment.
+I am not vain enough to think mine
+of any special value. I will, however, write
+you my feelings about them, encouraged to
+do so by your statement in the note to the
+pamphlet, that the use made of remarks<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">211</a></span>
+sent you will be anonymous, if it is so
+desired.</p>
+
+<p>First, as regards the general tone of the
+Letters. You tell me that the majority of the
+comments you have received have been hostile&mdash;people
+not taking their medicine without
+making wry faces. I am only surprised at
+the gentleness of the Letters, and I believe
+that if anyone will take the trouble to put
+down for himself on paper the sum of their
+contents, he will find it as difficult to gainsay
+as for careless readers it is easy to cavil at.
+On the other hand, the "hostile spirit" is
+readily provoked by the way in which some
+of the teaching of the Letters is put. Passages
+like the sixth paragraph in <a href="#X">Letter X.</a> appear
+an objectionable joke to some&mdash;perhaps to
+most&mdash;people; they do not see that it is really
+a serious jest, so put for brevity's sake, and
+that Ruskin might have put the same note to
+it as he has put to a passage in the "Crown
+of Wild Olive," p. 85, 8vo ed.: "Quite serious
+all this, though it reads like jest." I remember
+once asking Ruskin if his apparent joking
+in some Oxford lectures was not likely to
+lessen his influence, and he at once said to me,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">212</a></span>
+"Remember that most of my apparent jokes
+are serious, <i>ghastly</i> jests." I think he would
+be less often misunderstood, if this were more
+often understood.</p>
+
+<p>Your own preface marks the two main
+points in the spirit of the Letters. They
+are sternly practical, and at the same time
+their standard is one of an ideal perfection.
+People don't see that because the
+goal cannot be reached, the road towards it
+can still be trodden, and therefore they
+apply to the road an epithet which applies
+only to the goal. In this respect Ruskin's
+teaching might be mottoed with George
+Herbert's&mdash;</p>
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i8">"Who aimeth at the sky<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Shoots higher much than he that means a tree."<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<p>In fact, Ruskin's teaching, like that of the
+Bible, is not unpractical, but <i>unpractised</i>.</p>
+
+<p>I will now take the Letters in detail. The
+first four of them are merely introductory to
+the main matter of the eleven. In these first
+five two questions are asked&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>1. What is a clergyman of the Church of
+England? And to this the suggested answer<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">213</a></span>
+is (whom does it offend?), "A teacher of the
+Gospel of Christ to all nations."</p>
+
+<p>2. What is the teaching of the Gospel he is
+to teach? What is that teaching, clearly and
+simply put?</p>
+
+<p>Then <a href="#IV">Letter IV.</a> suggests that the Lord's
+Prayer may be taken as containing the cardinal
+points of that teaching, containing not all
+that is to be learnt, but what all have to learn.
+And so we come to <a href="#V">Letter V.</a>; and I tried, in
+reading the Letters for myself, to do for them
+what <a href="#III">Letter III.</a> asks clergymen to do for the
+Gospel.</p>
+
+<p><a href="#V">Letter V.</a>&mdash;A clergyman's first duty is to
+make the Lord's Prayer clear and living to his
+people. This is what Ruskin has elsewhere
+insisted on in other matters&mdash;"clear," know
+your duty and your belief; "living," realize it
+in your life&mdash;realize it "as a Captain's order,
+to be obeyed" ("Crown of Wild Olive," Introduction,
+p. 13. The whole of this Introduction
+reads well with these Letters). Then the first
+clause of the Prayer is set forth as putting
+before us God as a loving Father.</p>
+
+<p><a href="#VI">Letter VI.</a>&mdash;"Hallowed be Thy name." How
+do we fulfil the hope in our lives? How do<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">214</a></span>
+we betray it? Not in swearing only, as we
+are apt to think, but in the blasphemy of false
+and hypocritical prayer to, and praise of,
+<i>preaching about</i> God (last paragraph of the
+Letter). Clergymen, it is added, can prevent
+openly wicked men from being in their congregations
+(they are supposed to do so: Rubrics
+2 and 3 before the Holy Communion Service);
+they can not only compel the wicked poor into,
+but expel the wicked rich out of, churches.
+God sees the heart: the clergy should look to
+the hands and lips.</p>
+
+<p><a href="#VII">Letter VII.</a>&mdash;"Thy kingdom come:"&mdash;not
+an allusion to the second coming of the Son,
+which we cannot hasten, but to the coming of
+the kingdom of God the Father, which we
+can. This is again illustrated by the "Crown
+of Wild Olive" (I daresay it is by others of
+Ruskin's books, but it is convenient to refer
+chiefly to one, and that the one which contains
+what he calls his most biblical lecture), p. 56:
+"Observe it is a kingdom that is to come to
+us; we are not to go to it. Also it is not to
+be a kingdom of the dead, but of the living.
+Also it is not to come all at once, but quietly
+... without observation. <i>Also it is not to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">215</a></span>
+come outside of us, but in our hearts: 'the
+kingdom of God is within you.'</i>" This is
+the sense in which we can hasten <i>it</i>.</p>
+
+<p><a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a> begins with a hit at the pleasure
+priests take in their priesthood's dignity,
+and at their avoidance of its unpleasant
+duties, and at their sometimes wearisome
+preaching.</p>
+
+<p>Have they ever taught "Thy will be done,"
+as it should be&mdash;1. In our own sanctification;
+2. In understanding that will, and doing it,
+and striving to get it done (knowing their duty
+and doing it, and it alone)?</p>
+
+<p>The remarks about the mediatorial (absolving-from-punishment)
+and the pastoral (purging-from-sin)
+functions of a "pastor," seem
+to me quite admirable.</p>
+
+<p>The end of the Letter is subsequently amplified,
+<a href="#X">Letter X.</a></p>
+
+<p><a href="#IX">Letter IX.</a>&mdash;"Give us this day our daily
+bread." Yes, but we must work for it. "The
+man that will not work, neither shall he eat."
+A cardinal point with Ruskin: "But if you
+do" (<i>i.e.</i>, wish for God's kingdom), "you must
+do more than pray for it, you must work for
+it" ("Crown of Wild Olive," p. 56).<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">216</a></span></p>
+
+<p>And the clergyman has to teach (<a href="#IX">Letter IX.</a>
+goes on) what that work is and how it is to
+be done; and the life, to which their teaching
+should lead, is one "moderate in its self-indulgence,
+wide in its offices of temporal ministry
+to the poor," in the absence of which, prayer
+for harvest is mere blasphemy. For the spiritual
+bread is the first thing, and a clergyman's
+first message, "Choose ye this day
+whom ye will serve."</p>
+
+<p><a href="#X">Letter X.</a>&mdash;"Forgive us our trespasses."
+The explanation of trespasses, and substitution
+of <i>debts</i> for it, is admirable ("Dimitte
+nobis <i>debita</i> nostra"), and admirably illustrated
+by the sins of omission being condemned in
+Christ's judgment,&mdash;"I was hungry, and ye
+gave Me no meat."</p>
+
+<p>The remarks on the "pleasantness" of the
+English liturgy recall those on the avoidance
+of unpleasantness by the English clergy in
+<a href="#VIII">Letter VIII.</a></p>
+
+<p>I pass over the notes on the advantage
+of "forms of prayer," and come to the end
+of Letter <a href="#X">X.</a> and Letter <a href="#XI">XI.</a>, which go together,
+and say practically, Pray honestly or
+not at all. "Faithful prayer implies always<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">217</a></span>
+correlative exertions;" "dishonest prayer is
+blasphemy of the worst kind."</p>
+
+<p>"Crown of Wild Olive," p. 55, again:
+"Everybody in this room has been taught to
+pray daily, 'Thy kingdom come.' Now, if we
+hear a man swear in the streets, we think it
+very wrong, and say he 'takes God's name
+in vain.' But there is a twenty times worse
+way of taking His name in vain than that.
+It is to <i>ask God for what we don't want</i>.
+He doesn't like that sort of prayer. If you
+don't want a thing, don't ask for it; such
+asking is the worst mockery of your King
+you can insult Him with; the soldiers striking
+Him on the head was nothing to that. If
+you do not wish for His kingdom, don't pray
+for it."</p>
+
+<p>In fact, prayer is worse than useless if not
+sincere, and it is insincere if not carried out
+in the life of the "pray-er." Thus, "One
+hour in the execution of justice is worth
+seventy years of (insincere) prayer" (Mahometan
+maxim, "Crown of Wild Olive,"
+p. 49).</p>
+
+<p>I must stop. Only the fifth paragraph
+in <a href="#XI">Letter XI.</a>, about parents looking for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">218</a></span>
+"opportunities" for their children, is exactly
+parallel with "Sesame and Lilies," 8vo edition,
+p. 2 (Sub. 1, § 2), which might be added in
+an illustrative note. I must apologize for my
+long and rambling letter, but if it is of the
+least service to you I shall be content. I feel
+how inadequate it is to what I meant it to
+be, only I have no time just now to do more
+than write, as this letter is written&mdash;at the
+point of the pen.</p>
+
+<div class="smcapright">Oxoniensis.</div>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">219</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#CONTENTS">ToC</a></span></p>
+
+<h2><a name="LETTERS_FROM" id="LETTERS_FROM"></a>LETTERS FROM</h2>
+
+
+<h2>BRANTWOOD-ON-THE-LAKE</h2>
+
+<h4>TO THE</h4>
+
+<h2>VICARAGE OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS</h2>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">221</a></span></p>
+<h3><a name="PREFACE_2" id="PREFACE_2"></a>PREFACE</h3>
+
+<p>Some apology will naturally be expected
+for setting the following letters before
+the searching eye of a critical and possibly
+censorious public. I can only
+plead that the suggestion of their publication
+did not emanate from myself
+(for the idea of making these letters
+public property had never once in fifteen
+years crossed my mind), but was made
+to me by friends to whom it appeared
+that much in these letters is strongly
+characteristic of Mr. Ruskin, and illustrates
+(much too indulgently, alas!)
+the estimate he is good enough to form
+of a correspondent who does not to this
+day clearly understand to what happy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">222</a></span>
+circumstance he is indebted for so fortunate
+a partiality. At the same time it
+must be confessed that <i>Laudari a viro
+laudato</i> is a harmless ambition for the
+possession of a stimulus which is good
+for every soul of man.</p>
+
+<p>I will say no more upon that subject,
+lest my self-depreciation should be
+set down to vanity. Nevertheless it has
+always been a source of innocent pleasure
+to me that I have been enabled to
+bring my ship without damage through
+so perilous a voyage to port in a safe
+and honourable harbourage.</p>
+
+<p>The matters discussed in the following
+letters range only over a narrow field;
+but it will be found that they present a
+truly life-like picture of the writer with
+his shrewd common-sense and deeper
+wisdom, enlivened in no small measure
+by a quick impulsiveness which is sometimes
+rather startling. Some of his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">223</a></span>
+sudden sallies serve the purpose of the
+condiments, which displeasing if taken
+alone, give piquancy to our ordinary
+food.</p>
+
+<div class="smcapright">F. A. Malleson.</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let1" id="let1"></a>1.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>July 8th</i>, 1879.</div>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;You must
+make no public announcement of any
+paper by me. I am not able to count
+on my powers of mind for an hour; and
+will absolutely take no responsibility.
+What I do send you&mdash;if anything&mdash;will
+be in the form of a series of short letters
+to yourself, of which you have already
+the first: This the second for the sake
+of continuing the order unbroken contains
+the next following question which
+I should like to ask. If when the sequence
+of letters is in your possession<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">224</a></span>
+you like to read any part or parts of
+them as a subject of discussion at your
+afternoon meeting, I shall be glad and
+grateful.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever faithfully yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast1">J. Ruskin.</span><br />
+</div>
+
+
+<h3><a name="let2" id="let2"></a>2.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="center">[<i>Undated.</i>]</div>
+
+<p>I am so ashamed of keeping R.'s book&mdash;but
+it's impossible for me to look at
+it properly till I have done my lecture,
+so much must be left undone of it
+anyhow * * *</p>
+
+<p>Yes&mdash;you were glad to find we were at
+one in many thoughts. So was I. But
+we are not yet, you know, at one in
+our <i>sight</i> of this world and the dark
+ways of it. I hope to have you for a
+St. George's soldier one day.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">225</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let3" id="let3"></a>3.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>23rd July</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>Thanks for your note and your kind
+feelings. But you ought to know more
+about me.</p>
+
+<p>I profess to be a teacher; as you profess
+also.</p>
+
+<p>But we teach on totally different
+methods.</p>
+
+<p><i>You</i> believe what you wish to believe;
+teach that it is wicked to doubt
+it, and remain at rest and in much
+self-satisfaction.</p>
+
+<p><i>I</i> believe what I find to be true,
+whether I like or dislike it. And I
+teach other people that the chief of all
+wickednesses is to tell lies in God's
+service, and to disgrace our Master
+and destroy His sheep as <i>involuntary</i>
+Wolves.</p>
+
+<p><i>I</i>, therefore, am in perpetual effort to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">226</a></span>
+learn and discern&mdash;in perpetual Unrest
+and Dissatisfaction with myself.</p>
+
+<p>But it would simply require you to
+do twenty years of such hard work as
+I have done before you could in any
+true sense speak a word to me on
+such matters. You could not use a
+word in my sense. It would always
+mean to you something different.</p>
+
+<p>For instance&mdash;one of my quite bye
+works in learning my business of a
+teacher&mdash;was to read the New Testament
+through in the earliest Greek MS.
+(eleventh century) which I could get
+hold of. I examined every syllable of
+it and have more notes of various readings
+and on the real meanings of perverted
+passages than you would get
+through in a year's work. But I should
+require you to do the same work before
+I would discuss a text with you. From
+that and such work in all kinds I have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">227</a></span>
+formed opinions which you could no
+more move than you could Coniston
+Old Man. They may be wrong, God
+knows; I <i>trust</i> in them infinitely less
+than you do in those which you have
+formed simply by refusing to examine&mdash;or
+to think&mdash;or to know what is doing
+in the world about you; but you cannot
+stir them.</p>
+
+<p>I very very rarely make presents of my
+books. If people are inclined to learn
+from them, I say to them as a physician
+would&mdash;Pay me my fee&mdash;you will not
+obey me if I give you advice for nothing.</p>
+
+<p>But I should like a kind neighbour like
+you to know something about me, and I
+have therefore desired my publisher to
+send you one<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> of my many books which,
+after doing the work that I have done,
+you would have to read before you could
+really use words in my meaning.</p>
+
+
+<p>If you will read the introduction carefully,
+and especially dwell on the 10th
+to 15th lines of the 15th page, you will
+at least know me a little better than to
+think I believe in my own resurrection&mdash;but
+not in Christ's: and if you
+look to the final essay on War, you
+may find some things in it which will
+be of interest to you in your own<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a>
+work.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21">[21]</a> Crown of Wild Olive.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">228</a></span></span></p></div>
+
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22">[22]</a> Translating some of Erckmann-Chatrian's.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let4" id="let4"></a>4.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Venice</span>, <i>8th September</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>* * * * There is nothing whatever
+said as far as I remember in the July
+'Fors,' about "people's surrendering
+their judgment." A colonel does not
+surrender his judgment in obeying his
+general, nor a soldier in obeying his
+colonel. But there can be no army<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">229</a></span>
+where they <i>act</i> on their own judgments.</p>
+
+<p>The Society of Jesuits is a splendid
+proof of the power of obedience, but its
+curse is falsehood. When the Master
+of St. George's Company bids you lie,
+it will be time to compare our discipline
+to the Jesuits. We are their precise
+opposites&mdash;fiercely and at all costs
+frank, while they are calmly and for all
+interests lying.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let5" id="let5"></a>5.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood, Coniston</span>,<br />
+<i>July 30th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;I fear I have
+kept the proofs too long, but I wanted
+to look atain. I am confirmed
+in my impression that the book will do
+much good.<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> But I think it would<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">230</a></span>
+have done more if you had written the
+lives of two or three of your parishioners.
+Such an answer would I give
+to a painter who sent to me a picture
+of the Last Supper. "You had better,
+it seems to me, have painted a Harvest
+Home." I am gravely doubtful of the
+possibility, in these days, of writing or
+painting on such subjects, advisedly and
+securely.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. R.</span>
+</div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23">[23]</a> Life and Work of Jesus Christ. Ward &amp; Lock.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let6" id="let6"></a>6.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>July 31st</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I have received this week the two
+most astonishing letters I ever yet
+received in my life. And one of them
+is yours, read this morning&mdash;telling
+me&mdash;that you don't think you could
+write the life of an old woman! Yet<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">231</a></span>
+you think you <i>can</i> write the life of
+Christ!</p>
+
+<p>If you can at all explain this state of
+your mind to me I will tell you more
+distinctly what I think of the piece I
+saw. But I don't think you will communicate
+the thought to your publisher;
+and I never meant you to use
+my former one in that manner.</p>
+
+<p>Mind a publisher thinks only of
+money, and I know nothing of saleableness.
+The pause in my other letters
+is one of pure astonishment at you;
+which at present occupies all the time
+I have to spare on the subject, and has
+culminated to-day.</p>
+
+<p>I am so puzzled. I can scarcely
+think of anything else till you tell me
+what you mean in the bit about being
+"called late."</p>
+
+<p>Have you done no work in the vineyard
+'yet' then?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">232</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let7" id="let7"></a>7.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>August 2nd</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I am still simply speechless with
+astonishment at you. It is no question
+of your right to the best I can say; it
+is all at your command. But for the
+present my tongue cleaves to the roof
+of my mouth. I can only tell you with
+all the strength I have to read and
+understand and believe 2 Esdras iv.
+2, 20, 21.<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a></p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24">[24]</a> Thy heart hath gone too far in this world, and
+thinkest thou to comprehend the way of the most
+High? Then answered he me, and said, Thou hast
+given a right judgment, but why judgest thou not
+thyself also. For like as the ground is given unto the
+wood, and the sea to his floods: even so they that
+dwell upon the earth may understand nothing, but
+that which is upon the earth: and he only that
+dwelleth above the heavens, may understand the
+things that are above the height of the heavens.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">233</a></span></p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let8" id="let8"></a>8.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>August 4th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>It is just because you undertook the
+task so <i>happily</i>, that I should have
+thought you unfit to write the life of
+a Man of Sorrows, even had he been
+a Man only. But your last letter,
+remember, claims inspiration for your
+guide, and recognizes a personal call at
+sixty, as if the Call to the ministry
+had been none, and the receiving the
+Holy Ghost by imposition of hands an
+empty ceremony.</p>
+
+<p>In writing the life of a parishioner
+and in remitting or retaining their sins
+you would in my conception have been
+fulfilling your appointed work. But
+I cannot conceive the claim to be a
+fit Evangelist without more proof of
+miraculous appointment than you are
+conscious of. I know you to be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">234</a></span>
+conscientious, yes&mdash;but I think the
+judicial doom of this country is to have
+conscience alike of its Priests and Prophets
+<i>hardened</i>. Why should any letter
+of mine make you anxious if you had
+indeed conscience of inspiration?</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. R.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let9" id="let9"></a>9.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right"><i>August 7th.</i></div>
+
+<p>I hope to be able soon now to resume
+the series of letters; but it seems to me
+there is no need whatever of more than
+three or four more respecting the last
+clauses of the Lord's Prayer. Those in
+your hands contain questions enough, if
+seriously entertained, to occupy twenty
+meetings; and I could only hope that
+some one of them might be carefully
+taken up by your friends. I think,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">235</a></span>
+however, in case of the clerical feeling
+being too strong, that I must ask you,
+if you print letters at all, to print them
+without omission. And if you do not
+print them, to return them to me for
+my own expansion and arrangement.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. R.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let10" id="let10"></a>10.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>August 9th.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>I have got to work on the letters
+again; it would make me nervous to
+think of all these plans of yours. Suppose
+you leave all that till you see
+what the first debate comes to?<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> And
+in the meantime I'll finish as best I can.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25">[25]</a> My clerical friends and brethren must not be displeased
+with me if I here mention the fact that at
+the meeting of twenty-three clergy where I <i>proposed</i>
+to read Mr. Ruskin's letters to them, I was only
+authorized to do so by a majority of two. I can
+scarcely describe the dismay and consternation with
+which the letters themselves were received,&mdash;though
+of course not universally, in another meeting of the
+same number.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">236</a></span></p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let11" id="let11"></a>11.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>September 2nd.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>That there are only a hundred copies
+in that form,<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> is just a reason why the
+book should be in your library, where
+it will be enjoyed and useful; and not
+in mine, where it would not be opened
+once in a twelvemonth. It is one of
+the advantages of a small house (and
+it has many) that one is compelled to
+consider of all one's books whether they
+are in use or not.</p>
+
+
+<p>I yesterday ordered a 'Fors' to be
+sent you containing in its close the
+most important piece of a religious character
+in the book&mdash;this I hope you<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">237</a></span>
+will also allow to stay on your shelves.
+The two that I sent with this note
+contain so much that is saucy that I
+only send them in case you want to
+look at the challenge referred to in the
+Letters to the Bishop of Manchester,
+see October, 1877, pp. 322, 323, and
+January 1875, p. 11. You can keep as
+long as you like, but please take care
+of them, as my index is not yet done.
+The next letter will come before the
+week end, but it's a difficult one.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26">[26]</a> Grosart, "Poems of Christopher Harvey."</p></div>
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let12" id="let12"></a>12.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">The Vicarage,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
+Broughton-in-Furness</span>,<br />
+<i>September 4th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Mr. Ruskin</span>,&mdash;These parish
+engagements having been discharged
+which have taken up my time very
+closely since I came back from Brighton,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">238</a></span>
+I am returning to your letters, and I
+think you would like to know what
+I am doing. I am copying them down,
+first, as I can read them aloud better
+in my own handwriting, and secondly,
+because I shall not place the originals
+in the printer's hands.</p>
+
+<p>Then many thoughts arise in my
+mind as I re-peruse them, and I must
+needs (and I think I am allowed) give
+expression to my thoughts. Hence each
+letter is followed by my own comments
+or reflections upon it. But this need
+not make you feel nervous. On the
+whole there is much agreement between
+your modes of thought on religious subjects
+and my own.</p>
+
+<p>If this is thought a piece of cool
+assurance, I may reply in the words
+or sense of Euclid, That similar triangles
+may have the most various areas. I
+am not equal to you, but I claim to be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">239</a></span>
+similar. These comments I sometimes
+think I ought to show to you before publication;
+but perhaps you will agree with
+me that if I am fit to be trusted at all,
+I had better be left unconstrained. I
+shall certainly come to you first, if I find
+myself seriously at variance with you,
+which has not happened yet as far as the
+first clause of the Lord's Prayer. Then
+it is likely that I shall read the letters
+before two or three Clerical Societies,<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a>
+including my own, the Furness.</p>
+
+
+<p>The opinions delivered by those
+clergy it will be my duty, and I hope
+it will be my pleasure, to collect and
+to record. I propose also to invite
+the clergy who have not time or opportunity
+to speak in the meeting to write
+to me, and I will use my best judgment
+in selecting from their correspondence
+all that seems worth preserving.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">240</a></span></p>
+
+<p>I am very sensible that this is a
+most delicate and responsible task that
+is laid upon me, and I wonder to find
+myself so engaged. It will need tact,
+discretion, and kindness of heart, and I
+trust I may be endued with the necessary
+qualifications to a much larger extent
+than I think I naturally possess.</p>
+
+<p>I find no small comfort at the foot of
+the first page of the Preface to "Sesame
+and Lilies." There I feel I am at one
+with you.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">F. A. Malleson.</span>
+</div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27">[27]</a> At Liverpool and Brighton.</p></div>
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let13" id="let13"></a>13.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>September 5th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I shall be delighted to have the comments,
+though it will be well first to
+have the series of letters done&mdash;the last
+but one is coming to-morrow. I have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">241</a></span>
+only written them in the sense of your
+sympathy in most points, and am sure
+you will make the best possible use of
+them.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let14" id="let14"></a>14.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>September 7th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>It is rather comic that your first reply
+to my challenge concerning usury should
+be a prospectus of a Company<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> wishing
+to make 5 per cent. out of Broughton
+poor men's ignorance. You couldn't
+have sent me a project I should have
+regarded with more abomination.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28">[28]</a> A projected Public Hall.</p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let15" id="let15"></a>15.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>September 9th, 1879.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>There is absolutely no debate possible
+as to what usury is any more than<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">242</a></span>
+what adultery is. The Church has only
+been polluted by the indulgence of it
+since the 16th century. Usury is <i>any
+kind whatever</i> of interest on loan, and
+it is the essential modern form of
+Satan.</p>
+
+<p>I send you an old book full of sound
+and eternal teaching on this matter&mdash;please
+take care of it as a friend's
+gift, and one I would not lose for its
+weight in gold. Please read first the
+Sermon by Bishop Jewel, page 14, and
+then the rest at your pleasure or your
+leisure.</p>
+
+<p><i>No halls are wanted</i>, they are all rich
+men's excuses for destroying the home
+life of England.</p>
+
+<p>The public library should be at the
+village school (and I could put ten
+thousand pounds' worth of books into
+a single cupboard), and all that is done
+for education should be pure Gift. Do<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">243</a></span>
+you think that this rich England, which
+spends fifty millions a year in drink
+and gunpowder, can't educate her poor
+without being paid interest for her
+Charity?</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p>At the time of writing this the
+following letters passed between Mr.
+Ruskin and myself:&mdash;</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let16" id="let16"></a>16.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">The Vicarage,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
+Broughton-in-Furness,</span><br />
+<i>September 12th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Mr. Ruskin</span>,&mdash;I feel in a
+great strait. I have before me a task of
+the utmost delicacy, and one before which
+I feel that I <i>ought</i> to shrink,&mdash;that of
+editing your letters, with the accompaniment
+of comments of my own. You
+trust me, evidently, or you would have
+laid down limitations to guard yourself<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">244</a></span>
+against misrepresentation. My anxiety
+is lest I should abuse that large and
+generous confidence you have so kindly
+placed in me. Let me explain my position,
+as I see it myself.</p>
+
+<p>The series will consist of eleven
+letters, when you have sent me your
+last. I have now copied nine, and
+written concisely the views I have
+presumed to form upon each. With
+every letter I mostly agree and sympathize,
+looking on them as "counsels
+of perfection," and viewing the great
+subjects you deal with from a far
+higher standpoint than (in my experience)
+either laymen or clergymen
+generally view them. All that there
+is in me of <i>enthusiasm</i> rings in answering
+chords to the notes you
+strike. Yet I do not <i>always</i> agree.
+But when I do disagree, I acknowledge
+it is because your standard is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">245</a></span>
+excessively high&mdash;too high for practical
+purposes.</p>
+
+<p>Now, I ask, shall you consider it
+strictly fair and honourable in me to
+receive your letters, read them or
+send them to assemblies of clergy,
+gather their views, both adverse and
+favourable, and add diffident animad-versions
+of my own? If you will allow
+this to be right, and if you will trust
+to my sense of what is proper, to
+deal with your letters in the spirit of
+a Christian and a gentleman, then,
+hoping to fulfil your expectations, I
+shall proceed in my work with a
+mind more at ease; for I could not
+endure the thought that, after all was
+done, I had written a single sentence
+or word that had inflicted pain upon
+you.</p>
+
+<p>Then comes another question. Do
+you wish to hear or read my comments<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">246</a></span>
+before they are printed? I say frankly,
+if you trust me, I would prefer not;
+for it would not, perhaps, be pleasant
+for me either to read your praises, or
+my poor criticisms, to your face. But
+still, if you wish it, I shall be ready
+at your bidding; for I recognize your
+right to require it. Only I would
+rather read them to you myself some
+quiet autumn evening or two.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let17" id="let17"></a>17.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>September 13th.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;I am so very
+grateful for your proposal to edit the
+letters without further reference to me.
+I think that will be exactly the right
+way; and I believe I can put you at
+real ease in the doing of it by explaining
+as I can in very few words the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">247</a></span>
+kind of carte-blanche I should rejoicingly
+give you.</p>
+
+<p>Interrupted to-day! more to-morrow,
+with, I hope, the last letter.</p>
+
+<div class="smcapright">
+j. r.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let18" id="let18"></a>18.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>Sunday, September 14th.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>I've nearly done the last letter, but
+will keep it to-morrow rather than finish
+hurriedly for the earlier post. Your
+nice little note has just come, and I
+can only say that you cannot please me
+better than by acting with perfect freedom
+in all ways, and that I only want
+to see or reply to what you wish me
+for the matter's sake. And surely there
+is no occasion for any thought for waste
+of type about <i>me</i> personally, except only
+to express your knowledge of my real
+desire for the health and power of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">248</a></span>
+Church. More than this praise you <i>must</i>
+not give me, for I have learned almost
+everything I may say that I know by
+my errors.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let19" id="let19"></a>19.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>September 16th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I should have returned these two
+recent letters before now, but have
+been looking for the earlier letters
+which have got mislaid in a general
+rearrangement of all things by a new
+secretary. I am almost sure to come
+on them to-morrow in my own packing
+up for town, where I must be for a
+month hence. Please address, <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">249</a></span>&amp;c.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let20" id="let20"></a>20.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="center">[<i>Undated.</i>]</div>
+
+<p>I am sincerely grieved by the first
+part of your letter, and scarcely like to
+trouble you with answer to the close.
+* * * Surely the first thing to be done
+with the letters is to use them as you propose,
+and you may find fifty suggestions,
+made by persons or circumstances after
+that, worth considering. I do not doubt
+that I could easily add to the bulk of
+MS.; but should then, I think, stipulate
+for having the book published by my
+own publisher.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let21" id="let21"></a>21.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>October 13th.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>I did not get your kind and interesting
+letter till yesterday, and
+can only write in utter haste this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">250</a></span>
+morning to say that I think nothing
+can possibly be more satisfactory (to
+me personally at least) and more honourable
+than what you tell me of
+the wish of the meeting to have the
+letters printed for their quiet consideration.<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a></p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29">[29]</a> Canon Rawnsley kindly offered to print them at
+his own expense; only as many were printed as would
+be sufficient for three or four clerical societies. Had
+I known how valuable those little pamphlets were
+destined to become, I should have had many more
+printed!&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+
+<p>They are entirely at your command
+and theirs&mdash;but don't sell the copyright
+to any publisher. Keep it in your own
+hands, and after expenses are paid of
+course any profits should go to the
+poor. Please write during this week to
+me at St. George's Museum, Walkley,
+Sheffield.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">251</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let22" id="let22"></a>22.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="center">
+<i>From</i> <span class="smcap">Canon Farrar</span>.
+</div>
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>October 29th</i> 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p>I am much obliged to you for your
+courtesy in sending me the letters. I
+am not, however, inclined to enter into
+any controversy, being painfully overwhelmed
+with the very duties which
+Mr. Ruskin seems to think that we
+don't do&mdash;looking after the material and
+religious interests of the sick, the suffering,
+the hungry, the drunken, and the
+extremely wretched.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Yours very truly,<br />
+<span class="signlast2">F. W. Farrar.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let23" id="let23"></a>23.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Sheffield</span>, <i>October 17th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;I am sincerely
+interested and moved by your<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">252</a></span>
+history of your laborious life&mdash;and
+shall be entirely glad to leave the
+completed volume as your property,
+provided always you sell it to no publisher&mdash;but
+take just percentage on
+the editions: and provided also that
+an edition be issued of the letters
+themselves in their present simple form
+of which the profits, if any, shall be
+for the poor of the district.<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> It would
+lower your position in the whole matter
+if it could be hinted that I had
+written the letters with any semi-purpose
+of serving my friend. On the
+other hand you will have just and
+honourable right to the profits of the
+completed edition which your labour
+and judgment will have made possible
+and guided into the most serviceable
+form.</p>
+
+
+<p>I am thankful to see that the letters
+read clearly and easily, and contain all
+that it was in my mind to get said;
+that nothing can be possibly more right
+in every way than the printing and
+binding&mdash;nor more courteous and firm
+than your preface.</p>
+
+<p>Yes&mdash;there <i>will</i> be a chasm to cross&mdash;a
+tauriformis Aufidus<a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a>&mdash;greater than
+Rubicon, and the roar of it for many a
+year has been heard in the distance,
+through the gathering fog on earth
+more loudly.</p>
+
+
+
+<p>The River of Spiritual Death in this
+world&mdash;and entrance to Purgatory in
+the other, come down to us.</p>
+
+<p>When will the feet of the Priests be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">254</a></span>
+dipped in the still brim of the water?
+Jordan overflows his banks already.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p>When you have got your large edition
+with its correspondence into form, I
+should like to read the sheets as they
+are issued, and put merely letters of
+reference, <i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, and <i>c</i>, to be taken up in
+a short epilogue. But I don't want to
+do or say anything till you have all
+in perfect readiness for publication. I
+should merely add my reference letters
+in the margin, and the shortest possible
+notes at the end.</p>
+
+<p>Please send me ten more of these
+private ones for my own friends.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30">[30]</a> This, of course, with Mr. Allen's concurrence, is
+my intention.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">253</a></span></span></p></div>
+
+
+<div class="footnote"><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_31_31">[31]</a>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+
+<span class="i0"> Aufidus,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Qui regna Dauni præfluit Appuli<br /></span>
+<span class="i2">Quum sævit, horrendamque cultis<br /></span>
+<span class="i3">Diluviem meditatur agris.<br /></span>
+<span class="i8">&mdash;Hor. <i>Carm.</i> iv. 14.<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">255</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let24" id="let24"></a>24.</h3>
+
+<div class="center">
+<i>Extract of a Letter from the late</i><br /><br />
+<span class="smcap">Miss Susanna Beever</span>.
+</div>
+
+<div class="smallcent"><br />("The Younger Lady of the Thwaite, Coniston,"
+to whom Mr. Ruskin dedicated "Frondes Agrestes.")</div>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>October 28th, 1879.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Mr. Malleson</span>,&mdash;My sister has
+asked me to write and thank you for
+two copies of Mr. Ruskin's Letters,
+which you have been so good as
+to send to her. It is curious that
+before the post came this morning I
+had been wondering whether I might
+ask you for a copy. * * * I have
+already read these deeply interesting
+Letters five times. They are like the
+"foam globes of leaven," I might say
+they have exercised my mind very
+much. Things in them which at first
+seemed rather startling, prove on closer<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">256</a></span>
+examination to be full of deep truth.
+The suggestions in them lead to "great
+searchings of heart." There is much
+with which I entirely agree; much
+over which to ponder. What an insight
+into human nature is shown
+in the remark that though we are
+so ready to call ourselves "miserable
+sinners," we resent being accused of
+any special fault. * * *</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let25" id="let25"></a>25.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right"><i>November 7th</i>, 1879.</div>
+
+<p>I am so glad we understand each
+other now and that you will carry out
+your plan quietly.</p>
+
+<p>I think you should correct the present
+little book by my revise, and print
+enough for whatever private circulation
+the members of the meeting wish,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">257</a></span>
+but that it should not be made public
+till well after the large book is out.
+For which I shall look with deepest
+interest.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let26" id="let26"></a>26.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>November 19th</i>, 1879.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;I have not
+been able to answer a word lately,
+being quite unusually busy in France&mdash;and
+you never remember that it
+takes <i>me</i> as long to write a chapter as
+you to write a book, and tries me
+more to do it&mdash;so that I am sick of
+the feel of a pen this many a day.
+I'm delighted to hear of your popularity,<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a>
+being sure that all you advise
+people to do will be kind and right. I
+am not surprised at the popularity, but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">258</a></span>
+I wonder that you have not had some
+nasty envious reviews.<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a></p>
+
+
+<p>I like the impudence of these Scotch
+brats.<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> Do they suppose it would
+have been either pleasure or honour
+to me to come and lecture there? It
+is perhaps as much their luck as mine
+that they changed their minds about
+it. I shall be down at Brantwood
+soon (<i>D.V.</i>). Poor Mr. Sly's<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> death is
+a much more troublous thing to me than
+Glasgow Elections.</p>
+
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32">[32]</a> Meaning in the press notices of the Editor's
+"Life of Christ."&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33">[33]</a> Seventeen <i>very good</i>, five <i>good</i>, five <i>fair</i>, six
+<i>bad</i>, two <i>nasty, envious</i>!&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34">[34]</a> Glasgow University.</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35">[35]</a> Of the Waterhead, Coniston.</p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let27" id="let27"></a>27.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>January 5th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>A Happy New Year to you. If I
+may judge or guess by the efforts<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">259</a></span>
+made to draw me into the business, it
+is likely to be a busy one for you!
+Will you kindly now send me back
+my old book on Usury? I've got a
+letter (which for his lordship's sake had
+better never been written) from the
+Bishop of Manchester, and may want
+to quote a word or two of my back
+letter. I send the letter with my reply
+this month to the <i>Contemporary</i>.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let28" id="let28"></a>28.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>January 7th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>So many thanks for your kind little
+note and the book which I have received
+quite safely; and many more
+thanks for taking all the enemies' fire
+off me and leaving me quiet. I've
+been all this morning at work on finches
+and buntings; but I must give the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">260</a></span>
+Bishop a turn to-morrow. This weather
+takes my little wits out of me wofully;
+but I am always affectionately yours,</p>
+
+<div class="right">
+J. R.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let29" id="let29"></a>29.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>May 10th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;Yes, the
+omission of the 'Mr.' meant much
+change in all my feelings towards you
+and estimates of you&mdash;for which change,
+believe me, I am more glad and thankful
+than I can well tell you. Not but
+that of course I always felt your essential
+goodness and rightness of mind, but
+I did not at all understand the scope of
+them.</p>
+
+<p>And you will have the reward of the
+Visitation of the Sick, though every
+day I am more sure of the mistake
+made by good people universally&mdash;in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">261</a></span>
+trying to pull fallen people up&mdash;instead
+of keeping yet safe ones from tumbling
+after them, and always spending their
+pains on the worst instead of the best
+material. If they want to be able to
+save the lost like Christ, let them first
+be sure they can say with Him, "Of
+those Thou gavest Me I have lost
+none."</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>The 'Epilogue's' an awful bother to
+me in this May time! I have not done
+a word yet, but you shall have it before
+the week is out.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let30" id="let30"></a>30.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>April 17.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>The letters seem all very nice&mdash;I
+shall have very little to say about them,
+except to explain what you observe<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">262</a></span>
+and have been misunderstood.... Of
+course my notes shall be sent to you
+and added to when you see need. But
+I cannot do it quickly.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let31" id="let31"></a>31.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>April 14</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>Thanks for nice new proofs. I
+haven't found any false references, but
+I didn't look. I'll have all verified by
+my secretary. I'm busy with an article
+on modern novels and don't feel a bit
+pious just now; so the responses have
+hung fire.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let32" id="let32"></a>32.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>May 9.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>You are really very good about this,
+and shall have the notes (<i>D.V.</i>) within
+a fortnight. The Scott could not be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">263</a></span>
+put off, being promised for June 19,
+<i>Nineteenth Century</i>, and I could not
+do novels and sermons together. I
+don't think the notes will be long. The
+letters seem to be mostly compliments
+or small objections not worth noticing.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let33" id="let33"></a>33.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>May 14th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>I've just done&mdash;yesterday with Scott,
+and took up the letters for the first time
+this morning seriously.</p>
+
+<p>I had never seen <i>yours</i> at all when
+I wrote last. I fell first on Mr. &mdash;&mdash;,
+whom I read with some attention, and
+commented on with little favour; went
+on to the next, and remained content
+with that taste till I had done my
+Scott.</p>
+
+<p>I have this morning been reading<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">264</a></span>
+your own, on which I very earnestly
+congratulate you. God knows it isn't
+because they are friendly or complimentary,
+but because you <i>do</i> see what
+I mean, and people hardly ever do&mdash;and
+I think it needs very considerable
+power and feeling to forgive and
+understand as you do. You have said
+everything <i>I</i> want to say, and much
+more&mdash;except on the one point of
+excommunication, which will be the
+chief, almost the only subject of my
+final note.</p>
+
+<p>I write in haste to excuse myself for
+my former note.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately<br />
+<div class="signature">and gratefully yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast1">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>(<span class="smcap">Note.</span>&mdash;A legal friend remarks that
+in his opinion I should refrain from printing
+<i>extracts</i> from letters, and always print<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">265</a></span>
+the whole; or, indeed, in the present
+case, the whole series of letters, lest it
+should be suspected that I am making
+a self-indulgent selection only of the
+good words which Mr. Ruskin is kind
+enough to use in his communications
+with me. Let me here say, however,
+that had there been in all these letters
+any which conveyed censure, stricture,
+or blame of any kind, I should not
+have withheld my hand from including
+them. But no such letters ever came
+to me. Mr. Ruskin is the very pink
+of courtesy with his friends, and he
+<i>may</i> have suppressed remarks which
+he thought might wound me. But I
+am reproducing here not my friend's
+secret thoughts, but only those of his
+letters which remain in my possession.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Editor.</span>)<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">266</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let34" id="let34"></a>34.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>May 26th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>I'm at work on the 'Epilogue,' but
+it takes more trouble than I expected.
+I see there's a letter from you which I
+leave unopened, for fear there should
+be anything in it to put me in a bad
+temper, which you might easily do
+without meaning it. You shall have
+the 'Epilogue' as soon as I can get
+it done; but you won't much like it,
+for there are bits in the Clergymen's
+letters that have put my bristles up.
+They ought either to have said nothing
+about me, or known more.</p>
+
+<p>I should give that rascally Bishop
+a dressing "au sérieux," only you
+wouldn't like to godfather it, so I'll
+keep it for somewhere else.<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a></p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36">[36]</a> Needless to say that in this energetic language,
+the Master of the Company of St. George is referring
+to nothing whatever in the stainless character of
+the great Bishop, of whom it is justly recorded in the
+inscription on his monument in Manchester Cathedral
+that "he won all hearts by opening to them his
+own;" except only in the matter of house-rent and
+interest of money, opinions which the Bishop shared
+with the great mass of civilized humanity.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">267</a></span></p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let35" id="let35"></a>35.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>June 7th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>Your letter is a relief to my mind,
+and shall not be taken advantage of for
+more delay. The wet day or two would
+get all done: but I simply can't think of
+anything but the sun while it shines.</p>
+
+<p>And I've had second, third, and
+seventh thoughts about several things:
+as it is coming out I believe it will be
+a useful contribution to the book.</p>
+
+<p>I shall get it in the copyist's hand
+on Monday, and as it's one of my girl
+secretaries, I shall be teased till it's
+done, so it's safe for the end of the
+week (<i>D.V.</i>). I am sadly afraid she'll
+make me cut out some of the spiciest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">268</a></span>
+bits: the girl secretaries are always
+allowed to put their pens through anything
+they choose. Please drop the
+'Mr.'; it is a matter of friendship, not
+as if there were any of different powers.
+God only knows of higher and lower,
+and, as far as I can judge, is likely to
+put ministry to the sick much above
+public letters.</p>
+
+<p>Thanks for note of Menyanthes
+Trifoliata.</p>
+
+<p>I haven't seen it, scarcely moving at
+present beyond my wood or garden.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let36" id="let36"></a>36.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>June 13th</i> 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>You are really very good to put up
+with all that vicious Epilogue. But it
+won't discredit <i>you</i> in the end, whatever
+it may do me. I hope much otherwise.</p>
+
+<p>I will send you to-morrow the Lincoln,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">269</a></span>
+or, possibly, York MS. to look at.
+You will find the Litany following
+the Quicunque vult, and on the leaf
+marked by me 83, at the top the passage
+I began quotation with. It will
+need a note; for <i>domptnum</i> is, I believe,
+strong Yorkshire Latin for Donum
+Apostolicum, not Dominum.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>e</i> in Ecclesie for <i>æ</i> is the proper
+form in medieval Latin.</p>
+
+<p>The calendar and Litany are invaluable
+in their splendid lists of English
+saints, and the entire book unreplaceable,
+so mind you lock it up carefully!</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let37" id="let37"></a>37.</h3>
+
+
+<p>There's a good deal of interest in
+the enclosed layman's letter, I think.
+Would you like to print any bits of it?
+I cannot quite make up my mind if
+it's worth or not.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">270</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let38" id="let38"></a>38.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>June 27th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>The 'Epilogue' is all but done to-day,
+and shall be sent by railway guard
+to-morrow (<i>D.V.</i>), with a book which
+will further interest you and your good
+secretary. It is as fine an example of
+the coloured print Prayer-Book as I
+have seen, date 1507, and full of examples
+of the way Romanism had
+ruined itself at that date. But it may
+contain in legible form some things
+of interest. I never could make out
+so much as its Calendar; but the songs
+about the saints and rhymed hours
+are very pretty. Though the illuminations
+are all ridiculous and one or
+two frightful, most are more or less
+pretty, and nearly all interesting. You
+can keep it any time, but you must
+promise me not to show it to anybody<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">271</a></span>
+who does not know how to handle a
+book. * * *</p>
+
+<p>(<span class="smcap">Note.</span>&mdash;I may mention here, once
+for all, that wherever there are omissions
+left in Mr. Ruskin's letters, there
+is nothing of interest or importance in
+those passages for any one but for the
+receiver of that letter.)</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let39" id="let39"></a>39.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>July 15th</i>, 1880.
+</div>
+
+<p>* * * It is a further light to me,
+on your curious differences from most
+clergymen, very wonderful and venerable
+to me, that you should understand
+Byron!</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let40" id="let40"></a>40.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>June 25th.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;No, I don't want
+the letter printed in the least; but it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">272</a></span>
+ought to have interested you very differently.
+It is by a much older man than
+I, who has never heard of our letters,
+but has been a very useful and influential
+person in his own parish, and
+is a practical and acceptable contributor
+to sporting papers. He is an
+able lawyer also, and knows far better
+than I do and far better than most
+clergymen know, what could really be
+done in their country parishes if they
+had a mind.</p>
+
+<p>The bit of manuscript is perfectly
+fac-similed by your niece, but I can't
+read it: and it will be much better that
+you mark the places you wish certification
+about, and that I then send
+the book up to the British Museum,
+and have the whole made clear. The
+<i>dompt</i> is a very important matter
+indeed.</p>
+
+<p>I have got the last bit of epilogue<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">273</a></span>
+fairly on foot this morning, and can
+promise it on Monday all well.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. R.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let41" id="let41"></a>41.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>April 30th</i>, 1881.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;It will be many a
+day before I recover yet&mdash;if ever&mdash;but
+with caution I hope not to go wild
+again, and to get what power belongs
+to my age slowly back. When were
+you in the same sort of danger? Let
+me very strongly warn you from the
+whirlpool edge&mdash;the going down in the
+middle is gloomier than I can tell you.</p>
+
+<p>But I shall thankfully see you and
+your friend here. Visiting is out of the
+question for me. I can bear no fatigue
+nor excitement away from my home.
+I pay visits no more&mdash;anywhere (even<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">274</a></span>
+in old times few). It is always a
+great gladness to me when young
+students care about old books&mdash;and
+I remember as a duty the feeling I
+used to have in getting a Missal,
+even after I was past a good many
+other pleasures. You made such good
+use of that book too, that I am
+happy in yielding to any wish of
+yours about it, so your young friend<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a>
+shall have it if he likes. The marked
+price is quite a fair market one for it,
+though you might look and wait long
+before such a book came <i>into</i> the
+market. The British Museum people
+were hastily and superciliously wrong
+in calling it a common book. It is
+not a <i>showy</i> one; but there are few
+more interesting or more perfect service
+books in English manuscript, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">275</a></span>
+the Museum people buy cart-loads of
+big folios that are not worth the shelf
+room.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37">[37]</a> Rev. J. R. Haslam, now Vicar of Thwaites,
+Cumberland. See Appendix.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let42" id="let42"></a>42.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right"><i>April 23rd</i> 1881.</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;These passages
+of description and illustration of
+the general aspect of Ephesus in St.
+Paul's time seem to me much more
+forcibly and artistically written than anything
+you did in the "Life of Christ";
+and I could not suggest any changes
+to you which you could now carry out
+under the conditions of time to revise,
+except a more clear statement of the
+Ephesian goddess.</p>
+
+<p>[I really do not think Mr. Ruskin
+would wish that <i>all</i> he wrote in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">276</a></span>
+next sentence about the Ephesian
+Diana should be placed before the
+public eye. But I resume in the middle
+of a sentence.]</p>
+
+<p>... practically at last and chiefly
+of the Diabolic Suction of the Usurer;
+and her temple, which you luckily liken
+to the Bank of England, was in fact
+what that establishment would be as
+the recognised place of pious pilgrimage
+for all Jews, infidels, or prostitutes in
+the realm of England. You could not
+conceive the real facts of these degraded
+worships of the mixed Greek
+and Asiatic races, unless you gave a
+good year's work to the study of the
+decline of Greek art in the 3rd and
+4th centuries <span class="smcap">b.c.</span></p>
+
+<p>Charles Newton's pride in discovering
+Mausolus, and engineers' whistling
+over his Asiatic mummy, have entirely
+corrupted and thwarted the uses of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">277</a></span>
+the British Museum Art Galleries.
+The Drum of that Diana Temple is
+barbarous rubbish, not worth tenpence a
+ton; and if I shewed you a photograph
+of the head of Mausolus without telling
+you what it was, I will undertake that
+you saw with candid eyes in it nothing
+more than the shaggy poll of a common
+gladiator. But your book will swim
+with the tide. It is best so.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let43" id="let43"></a>43.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>July....</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>I'm not in the least anxious about
+my MS., and shall only be glad if you
+like to keep it long enough to read
+thoroughly. There must surely be published
+copies of such extant, though,
+and worth enquiring after?</p>
+
+<p>Partly the fine weather, partly the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">278</a></span>
+heat, partly a fit of Scott and Byron
+have stopped the Epilogue utterly for
+the time! You cannot be in any hurry
+for it surely? There's plenty to go on
+printing with.</p>
+
+<p>I don't think you will find the n's and
+m's much bother; the contractions are
+the great nuisance. But I do think this
+development of Gothic writing one of
+the oddest absurdities of mankind.</p>
+
+<p>The illumination of "the fool hath
+said in his heart," snapping his fingers,
+or more accurately making the indecent
+sign called "the fig" by the Italians,
+is a very unusual one in this MS., and
+peculiarly English.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let44" id="let44"></a>44.</h3>
+
+
+<p>There is not the least use in my looking
+over these sheets: you probably<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">279</a></span>
+know more about Athens than I do,
+and what I do know is out of and in
+Smith's Dictionary, where you can find
+it without trouble.</p>
+
+<p>For the rest you must please always
+remember what I told you once for all,
+that you could never interest <i>me</i> by
+writing about people, either at Athens
+or Ephesus, but only of those of the
+parish of Broughton-in-Furness.</p>
+
+<p>That new translation could not come
+out well; that much I know without
+looking at it. One must believe the
+Bible before one understands it, (I
+mean, believe that it is understandable)
+and one must understand before one
+can translate it. Two stages in advance
+of your Twenty-Four Co-operative
+Tyndales!<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">280</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let45" id="let45"></a>45.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>26th May.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;I should be delighted
+to see Canon Weston and you
+any day: but I want J&mdash;&mdash; to be at home,
+and she is going to town next week
+for a month, and will be fussy till she
+goes. She promises to be back faithfully
+within the week after that&mdash;within
+the Sunday, I mean. Fix any day or
+any choice of days if one is wet after
+the said Sunday, and we shall both be
+in comfort ready.</p>
+
+<p>If Canon Weston or you are going
+away anywhere, come any day before
+that suits you.</p>
+
+<p>In divinity matters I am obliged to
+stop&mdash;for my sins, I suppose. But it
+seems I am almost struck mad when I
+think earnestly about them, and I'm only
+reading now natural history or nature.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">281</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Never mind Autograph people, they
+are never worth the scratch of a pen.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. R.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let46" id="let46"></a>46.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>August 26th</i>, 1881.
+</div>
+
+<p>I'm in furious bad humour with the
+weather, and cannot receive just now
+at all, having had infinitely too much
+of indoors, and yet unable to draw for
+darkness, or write for temper. But I
+will see Mr. &mdash;&mdash; if he has any other
+reason than curiosity for wishing to see
+me&mdash;what does he want with me?</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let47" id="let47"></a>47.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>21st October.</i>
+</div>
+
+<p>I am fairly well, but have twenty
+times the work in hand that I am
+able for; and read&mdash;Virgil, Plato, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">282</a></span>
+Hesoid, when I have time! But assuredly
+no modern books; least of all
+my friends', lest I should have either
+to flatter or offend. Still less will I
+have to say to young men proposing
+to become clergymen. I have distinctly
+told them their business is at present&mdash;to
+dig, not preach.</p>
+
+<p>Let your young friend read his Fors.
+All that he needs of me is in that.</p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let48" id="let48"></a>48.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Annecy, Savoy</span>,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
+<i>November 15th</i>, 1882.
+</div>
+
+<p>I have got your kind little note of the
+11th yesterday, and am entirely glad to
+hear of your papers on the Duddon. I
+shall be very happy indeed if you find
+any pleasure in remembering our walk
+to the tarn.<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a> I hope I know now better<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">283</a></span>
+how to manage myself in all ways, and
+we may still have some pleasant talks,
+my health not failing me.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38">[38]</a> Goat's Water, under the Old Man of Coniston.</p></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let49" id="let49"></a>49.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Talloire, Switzerland</span>,<br />
+<i>November 20th</i>, 1882.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;I am sincerely
+grieved that you begin to feel the effect
+of overwork; but as this is the first
+warning you have had, and as you are
+wise enough to obey it, I trust that the
+three months' rest will restore you all
+your usual powers on the conditions of
+using them with discretion, and not
+rising to write at two in the morning.</p>
+
+<p>I am very thankful to find in my own
+case that a quiet spring of energy filters
+back into the old well-heads&mdash;if one does
+not bucket it out as fast as it comes in.</p>
+
+<p>But my last illnesses seriously impaired<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">284</a></span>
+my walking powers, and I'm afraid if
+you came to Switzerland I should be
+very jealous of you.</p>
+
+<p>Certainly it is not in this season a
+country for an invalid, and I believe
+you cannot be safer than by English
+firesides with no books to work at nor
+parishioners to visit.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let50" id="let50"></a>50.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<i>January 22nd</i>, 1883.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;I am heartily glad
+to hear that you are better, and that you
+are going to lead the Vicar of Wakefield's
+quiet life. I am not stronger
+myself, but think it right to keep hold
+of the Oxford Helm, as long as they
+care to trust it to me.</p>
+
+<p>I've entirely given up reviewing, but
+if the Editor of the <i>Contemporary</i><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">285</a></span>
+would send me Mr. Peek's Article,
+when set up, I might perhaps send a
+note or two on it, which the real reviewer
+might use or not at his pleasure. In
+the meantime it would greatly oblige
+me if the Editor could give me the
+reference to an old article of mine on
+Herbert Spencer, (or at least on a saying
+of his), which I cannot find where
+I thought it was in the <i>Nineteenth
+Century</i>, and suppose therefore to have
+been in the <i>Contemporary</i> before the
+<i>Nineteenth Century</i> Athena arose out
+of its cleft head.</p>
+
+<p>The Article had a lot about Coniston
+in it, but I quite forget what else it
+was about. I think it must have been
+just before the separation. Kindest
+regards and congratulations on your
+convalescence from all here.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span></div>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">286</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+<h3><a name="let51" id="let51"></a>51.</h3>
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>February 6th</i>, 1883.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;I'm nearly
+beside myself with a sudden rush of
+work on my return from abroad, and
+resumption of Oxford duties, and I
+simply <i>cannot</i> yet think over the business
+of the letters, the rather that <i>I</i>
+certainly never would re-publish most
+of those clergymen's letters at all.</p>
+
+<p>My own were a gift to you, and I am
+quite ready to print <i>them</i> if you like,
+and let you have half profits, the St.
+George's Guild having the other. But
+that could not be for some time yet.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">287</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#CONTENTS">ToC</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="EPILOGUE_BY_MR_RUSKIN" id="EPILOGUE_BY_MR_RUSKIN"></a>EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN</h2>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">289</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+
+<div class="right">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood, Coniston</span>, <i>June 1880</i>.
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">My dear Malleson</span>,&mdash;I have glanced
+at the proofs you send; and <i>can</i> do no
+more than glance, even if it seemed to
+me desirable that I should do more,&mdash;which,
+after said glance, it does in no
+wise. Let me remind you of what it
+is absolutely necessary that the readers
+of the book should clearly understand&mdash;that
+I wrote these Letters at your
+request, to be read and discussed at the
+meeting of a private society of clergymen.
+I declined then to be present at
+the discussion, and I decline still. You
+afterwards asked leave to print the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">290</a></span>
+Letters, to which I replied that they
+were yours, for whatever use you saw
+good to make of them: afterwards
+your plans expanded, while my own
+notion remained precisely what it had
+been&mdash;that the discussion should have
+been private, and kept within the
+limits of the society, and that its
+conclusions, if any, should have been
+announced in a few pages of clear
+print, for the parishioners' exclusive
+reading.</p>
+
+<p>I am, of course, flattered by the wider
+course you have obtained for the Letters,
+but am not in the slightest degree interested
+by the debate upon them, nor by
+any religious debates whatever, undertaken
+without serious conviction that
+there is a jot wrong in matters as they
+are, or serious resolution to make them
+a tittle better. Which, so far as I can
+read the minds of your correspondents,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">291</a></span>
+appears to me the substantial state of
+them.</p>
+
+<p>One thing I cannot pass without protest&mdash;the
+quantity of talk about the
+writer of the Letters. What I am, or
+am not, is of no moment whatever to
+the matters in hand. I observe with
+comfort, or at least with complacency,
+that on the strength of a couple of
+hours' talk, at a time when I was
+thinking chiefly of the weatherings of
+slate you were good enough to show
+me above Goat's Water, you would
+have ventured to baptize me in the
+little lake&mdash;as not a goat, but a sheep.
+The best I can be sure of, myself, is
+that I am no wolf, and have never
+aspired to the dignity even of a Dog
+of the Lord.</p>
+
+<p>You told me, if I remember rightly,
+that one of the members of the original
+meeting denounced me as an<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">292</a></span>
+arch-heretic<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a>&mdash;meaning, doubtless, an
+arch-pagan; for a heretic, or sect-maker,
+is of all terms of reproach the last
+that can be used of me. And I think he
+should have been answered that it was
+precisely as an arch-pagan that I ventured
+to request a more intelligible and
+more unanimous account of the Christian
+Gospel from its preachers.</p>
+
+<p>If anything in the Letters offended
+those of you who hold me a brother,
+surely it had been best to tell me
+between ourselves, or to tell it to the
+Church, or to let me be Anathema
+Maranatha in peace,&mdash;in any case, I
+must at present so abide, correcting
+only the mistakes about myself which
+have led to graver ones about the things
+I wanted to speak of.<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a></p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">293</a></span></p>
+<p>The most singular one, perhaps, in
+all the Letters is that of Mr. &mdash;&mdash;,
+that I do not attach enough weight to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">294</a></span>
+antiquity. My reply to it is partly
+written already, with reference to the
+wishes of some other of your correspondents
+to know more of my reasons
+for finding fault with the English
+Liturgy.</p>
+
+<p>If people are taught to use the
+Liturgy rightly and reverently, it will
+bring them all good; and for some
+thirty years of my life I used to read
+it always through to my servant and
+myself, if we had no Protestant church
+to go to, in Alpine or Italian villages.
+One can always tacitly pray of it
+what one wants, and let the rest pass.
+But, as I have grown older, and
+watched the decline in the Christian
+faith of all nations, I have got more
+and more suspicious of the effect of
+this particular form of words on the
+truthfulness of the English mind (now
+fast becoming a salt which has lost his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">295</a></span>
+savour, and is fit only to be trodden
+under foot of men). And during the
+last ten years, in which my position at
+Oxford has compelled me to examine
+what authority there was for the code
+of prayer, of which the University is now
+so ashamed that it no more dares compel
+its youths so much as to hear, much
+less to utter it, I got necessarily into
+the habit of always looking to the
+original forms of the prayers of the fully
+developed Christian Church. Nor did I
+think it a mere chance which placed in
+my own possession a manuscript of the
+perfect Church service of the thirteenth
+century,<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> written by the monks of the
+Sainte Chapelle for St. Louis; together
+with one of the same date, written in
+England, probably for the Diocese of
+Lincoln; adding some of the Collects,
+in which it corresponds with St. Louis's,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">296</a></span>
+and the Latin hymns so much beloved
+by Dante, with the appointed music for
+them.</p>
+
+
+<p>And my wonder has been greater
+every hour, since I examined closely
+the text of these and other early books,
+that in any state of declining, or captive,
+energy, the Church of England should
+have contented itself with a service
+which cast out, from beginning to end,
+all these intensely spiritual and passionate
+utterances of chanted prayer
+(the whole body, that is to say, of
+the authentic <i>Christian</i> Psalms), and in
+adopting what it timidly preserved of
+the Collects, mangled or blunted them
+down to the exact degree which would
+make them either unintelligible or inoffensive&mdash;so
+vague that everybody
+might use them, or so pointless that
+nobody could be offended by them.
+For a special instance: The prayer for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_297" id="Page_297">297</a></span>
+"our bishops and curates, and all congregations
+committed to their charge,"
+is, in the Lincoln Service-book, "for
+our bishop, and all congregations committed
+to <i>his</i> charge." The change from
+singular to plural seems a slight one.
+But it suffices to take the eyes of the
+people off their own bishop into infinite
+space; to change a prayer which was intended
+to be uttered in personal anxiety
+and affection, into one for the general
+good of the Church, of which nobody
+could judge, and for which nobody would
+particularly care; and, finally, to change
+a prayer to which the answer, if given,
+would be visible, into one of which nobody
+could tell whether it were answered
+or not.</p>
+
+<p>In the Collects, the change, though
+verbally slight, is thus tremendous in
+issue. But in the Litany&mdash;word and
+thought go all wild together. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_298" id="Page_298">298</a></span>
+first prayer of the Litany in the Lincoln
+Service-book is for the Pope and all
+ranks beneath him, implying a very
+noteworthy piece of theology&mdash;that the
+Pope might err in religious matters,
+and that the prayer of the humblest
+servant of God would be useful to
+him:&mdash;"Ut Dompnum Apostolicum, et
+omnes gradus ecclesie in sancta religione
+conservare digneris." Meaning
+that whatever errors particular persons
+might, and must, fall into, they prayed
+God to keep the Pope right, and the
+collective testimony and conduct of
+the ranks below him. Then follows
+the prayer for their own bishop and
+<i>his</i> flock&mdash;then for the king and the
+princes (chief lords), that they (not
+all nations) might be kept in concord&mdash;and
+then for <i>our</i> bishops and
+abbots,&mdash;the Church of England proper;
+every one of these petitions being direct,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_299" id="Page_299">299</a></span>
+limited, and personally heartfelt;&mdash;and
+then this lovely one for themselves:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>"Ut obsequium servitutis nostre rationabile
+facias."&mdash;"That thou wouldst
+make the obedience of our service
+reasonable" ("which is your reasonable
+service").<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a></p>
+
+
+<p>This glorious prayer is, I believe,
+accurately an "early English" one. It
+is not in the St. Louis Litany, nor
+in a later elaborate French fourteenth
+century one; but I find it softened in
+an Italian MS. of the fifteenth century
+into "ut nosmet ipsos in tuo sancto
+servitio confortare et conservare digneris,"&mdash;"that
+thou wouldst deign to
+keep and comfort us ourselves in thy
+sacred service" (the comfort, observe,
+being here asked for whether reasonable
+or not!); and in the best and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_300" id="Page_300">300</a></span>
+fullest French service-book I have,
+printed at Rouen in 1520, it becomes,
+"ut congregationes omnium sanctorum
+in tuo sancto servitio conservare digneris;"
+while victory as well as concord
+is asked for the king and the
+princes,&mdash;thus leading the way to that
+for our own Queen's victory over all her
+enemies, a prayer which might now be
+advisedly altered into one that she&mdash;and
+in her, the monarchy of England&mdash;might
+find more fidelity in their
+friends.</p>
+
+<p>I give one more example of the corruption
+of our Prayer-Book, with reference
+to the objections taken by some of
+your correspondents to the distinction
+implied in my Letters between the Persons
+of the Father and the Christ.</p>
+
+<p>The "Memoria de Sancta Trinitate,"
+in the St. Louis service-book, runs thus:</p>
+
+<p>"Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, qui<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_301" id="Page_301">301</a></span>
+dedisti famulis tuis in confessione vere
+fidei eterne Trinitatis gloriam agnoscere,
+et in potentia majestatis adorare
+unitatem, quesumus ut ejus fidei firmitate
+ab omnibus semper muniemur adversis.
+Qui vivis et regnas Deus, per
+omnia secula seculorum. Amen."</p>
+
+<p>"Almighty and everlasting God, who
+hast given to Thy servants, in confession
+of true faith to recognize the
+glory of the Eternal Trinity, and in
+the power of Majesty to pray to the
+Unity; we ask that by the firmness of
+that faith we may be always defended
+from all adverse things, who livest and
+reignest God through all ages. Amen."</p>
+
+<p>Turning to our Collect, we find we
+have first slipped in the word "us"
+before "Thy servants," and by that
+little insertion have slipped in the squire
+and his jockey, and the public-house
+landlord&mdash;and any one else who may<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_302" id="Page_302">302</a></span>
+chance to have been coaxed, swept,
+or threatened into church on Trinity
+Sunday, and required the entire company
+of them to profess themselves
+servants of God, and believers in the
+mystery of the Trinity. And we think
+we have done God a service!</p>
+
+<p>"Grace." Not a word about grace
+in the original. You don't believe by
+having grace, but by having wit.</p>
+
+<p>"To acknowledge." "Agnosco" is
+to recognize, not to acknowledge. To
+<i>see</i> that there are three lights in a
+chandelier is a great deal more than
+to acknowledge that they are there.</p>
+
+<p>"To worship." "Adorare" is to
+pray to, not to worship. You may worship
+a mere magistrate; but you <i>pray</i>
+to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.</p>
+
+<p>The last sentence in the English is
+too horribly mutilated to be dealt with
+in any patience. The meaning of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_303" id="Page_303">303</a></span>
+great old collect is that by the shield
+of that faith we may quench all the
+fiery darts of the devil. The English
+prayer means, if it means anything,
+"Please keep us in our faith without
+our taking any trouble; and, besides,
+please don't let us lose our money, nor
+catch cold."</p>
+
+<p>"Who livest and reignest." Right;
+but how many of any extant or instant
+congregations understand what the two
+words mean? That God is a living
+God, not a dead Law; and that He is
+a reigning God, putting wrong things
+to rights, and that, sooner or later, with
+a strong hand and a rod of iron; and
+not at all with a soft sponge and warm
+water, washing everybody as clean as
+a baby every Sunday morning, whatever
+dirty work they may have been
+about all the week.</p>
+
+<p>On which latter supposition your<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_304" id="Page_304">304</a></span>
+modern Liturgy, in so far as it has supplemented
+instead of corrected the old
+one, has entirely modelled itself,&mdash;producing
+in its first address to the congregation
+before the Almighty precisely
+the faultfullest and foolishest piece of
+English language that I know in the
+whole compass of English or American
+literature. In the seventeen lines of it
+(as printed in my old-fashioned, large-print
+prayer-book), there are seven times
+over two words for one idea.</p>
+
+<div class="list">
+1. Acknowledge and confess.<br />
+2. Sins and wickedness.<br />
+3. Dissemble nor cloke.<br />
+4. Goodness and mercy.<br />
+5. Assemble and meet.<br />
+6. Requisite and necessary.<br />
+7. Pray and beseech.<br />
+</div>
+
+<p>There is, indeed, a shade of difference
+in some of these ideas for a good scholar,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_305" id="Page_305">305</a></span>
+none for a general congregation;<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> and
+what difference they can guess at merely
+muddles their heads: to acknowledge
+sin is indeed different from confessing
+it, but it cannot be done at a minute's
+notice; and goodness is a different thing
+from mercy, but it is by no means
+God's infinite goodness that forgives
+our badness, but that judges it.</p>
+
+
+<p>"The faultfullest," I said, "and the
+foolishest." After using fourteen words<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_306" id="Page_306">306</a></span>
+where seven would have done, what is
+it that the whole speech gets said with
+its much speaking? This Morning
+Service of all England begins with the
+assertion that the Scripture moveth us
+in sundry places to confess our sins
+before God. <i>Does</i> it so? Have your
+congregations ever been referred to those
+sundry places? Or do they take the
+assertion on trust, or remain under the
+impression that, unless with the advantage
+of their own candour, God
+must remain ill-informed on the subject
+of their sins?</p>
+
+<p>"That we should not dissemble nor
+cloke them." <i>Can</i> we then? Are
+these grown-up congregations of the
+enlightened English Church in the
+nineteenth century still so young in
+their nurseries that the "Thou, God,
+seest me" is still not believed by them
+if they get under the bed?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_307" id="Page_307">307</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Let us look up the sundry moving
+passages referred to.</p>
+
+<p>(I suppose myself a simple lamb of
+the flock, and only able to use my
+English Bible.)</p>
+
+<p>I find in my concordance (confess and
+confession together) forty-two occurrences
+of the word. Sixteen of these,
+including John's confession that he was
+not the Christ, and the confession of
+the faithful fathers that they were pilgrims
+on the earth, do indeed move us
+strongly to confess Christ before men.
+Have you ever taught your congregations
+what that confession means?
+They are ready enough to confess
+Him in church, that is to say, in their
+own private synagogue. Will they in
+Parliament? Will they in a ball-room?
+Will they in a shop? Sixteen of the
+texts are to enforce their doing <i>that</i>.</p>
+
+<p>The next most important one (1 Tim.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_308" id="Page_308">308</a></span>
+vi. 13) refers to Christ's own good
+confession, which I suppose was not of
+His sins, but of His obedience. How
+many of your congregations can make
+any such kind of confession, or wish to
+make it?</p>
+
+<p>The eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth
+(1 Kings viii. 33, 2 Chron. vi. 26,
+Heb. xiii. 15) speak of confessing thankfully
+that God is God (and not a putrid
+plasma nor a theory of development),
+and the twenty-first (Job xl. 14) speaks
+of God's own confession, that no doubt
+we are the people, and that wisdom
+shall die with us, and on what conditions
+He will make it.</p>
+
+<p>There remain twenty-one texts which
+do speak of the confession of our sins&mdash;very
+moving ones indeed&mdash;and Heaven
+grant that some day the British public
+may be moved by them.</p>
+
+<p>1. The first is Lev. v. 5, "He shall<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_309" id="Page_309">309</a></span>
+confess that he hath sinned <i>in that
+thing</i>." And if you can get any soul
+of your congregation to say he has
+sinned in <i>any</i>thing, he may do it in two
+words for one if he likes, and it will
+yet be good liturgy.</p>
+
+<p>2. The second is indeed general&mdash;Lev.
+xvi. 21: the command that the whole
+nation should afflict its soul on the great
+day of atonement once a year. The
+Church of England, I believe, enjoins no
+such unpleasant ceremony. Her festivals
+are passed by her people often indeed
+in the extinction of their souls, but by
+no means in their intentional affliction.</p>
+
+<p>3. The third, fourth, and fifth (Lev.
+xxvi. 40, Numb. v. 7, Nehem. i. 6) refer
+all to national humiliation for definite
+idolatry, accompanied with an entire
+abandonment of that idolatry, and of
+idolatrous persons. How soon <i>that</i>
+form of confession is likely to find a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_310" id="Page_310">310</a></span>
+place in the English congregations the
+defences of their main idol, mammon,
+in the vilest and cruellest shape of it&mdash;usury&mdash;with
+which this book has
+been defiled, show very sufficiently.</p>
+
+<p>6. The sixth is Psalm xxxii. 5&mdash;virtually
+the whole of that psalm, which
+does, indeed, entirely refer to the
+greater confession, once for all opening
+the heart to God, which can be by no
+means done fifty-two times a year, and
+which, once done, puts men into a state
+in which they will never again say there
+is no health in them; nor that their
+hearts are desperately wicked; but will
+obey for ever the instantly following
+order, "Rejoice in the Lord, ye righteous,
+and shout for joy, all ye that are
+true of heart."</p>
+
+<p>7. The seventh is the one confession
+in which I can myself share:&mdash;"After
+the way which they call heresy,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_311" id="Page_311">311</a></span>
+so worship I the Lord God of my
+fathers."</p>
+
+<p>8. The eighth, James v. 16, tells us to
+confess our faults&mdash;not to God, but "one
+to another"&mdash;a practice not favoured
+by English catechumens&mdash;(by the way,
+what <i>do</i> you all mean by "auricular"
+confession&mdash;confession that can be
+heard? and is the Protestant pleasanter
+form one that can't be?)</p>
+
+<p>9. The ninth is that passage of St.
+John (i. 9), the favourite evangelical
+text, which is read and preached by
+thousands of false preachers every day,
+without once going on to read its great
+companion, "Beloved, if our heart
+condemn us, God is greater than our
+heart, and knoweth all things; but if
+our heart condemn us <i>not</i>, then have
+we confidence toward God." Make
+your people understand the second text,
+and they will understand the first. At<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_312" id="Page_312">312</a></span>
+present you leave them understanding
+neither.</p>
+
+<p>And the entire body of the remaining
+texts is summed in Joshua vii. 19 and
+Ezra x. 11, in which, whether it be
+Achan, with his Babylonish garment,
+or the people of Israel, with their Babylonish
+lusts, the meaning of confession
+is simply what it is to every brave boy,
+girl, man, and woman, who knows the
+meaning of the word "honour" before
+God or man&mdash;namely, to say what they
+have done wrong, and to take the punishment
+of it (not to get it blanched over by
+any means), and to do it no more&mdash;which
+is so far from being a tone of mind
+generally enforced either by the English,
+or any other extant Liturgy, that,
+though all my maids are exceedingly
+pious, and insist on the privilege of
+going to church as a quite inviolable
+one, I think it a scarcely to be hoped<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_313" id="Page_313">313</a></span>
+for crown and consummation of virtue
+in them that they should tell me when
+they have broken a plate; and I should
+expect to be met only with looks of
+indignation and astonishment if I ventured
+to ask one of them how she had
+spent her Sunday afternoon.</p>
+
+<p>"Without courage," said Sir Walter
+Scott, "there is no truth; and without
+truth there is no virtue." The sentence
+would have been itself more true if
+Sir Walter had written "candour" for
+"truth," for it is possible to be true
+in insolence, or true in cruelty. But
+in looking back from the ridges of the
+Hill Difficulty in my own past life, and
+in all the vision that has been given
+me of the wanderings in the ways of
+others&mdash;this, of all principles, has become
+to me surest&mdash;that the first virtue
+to be required of man is frankness of
+heart and lip: and I believe that every<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_314" id="Page_314">314</a></span>
+youth of sense and honour, putting
+himself to faithful question, would feel
+that he had the devil for confessor, if
+he had not his father or his friend.</p>
+
+<p>That a clergyman should ever be so
+truly the friend of his parishioners as
+to deserve their confidence from childhood
+upwards, may be flouted as a sentimental
+ideal; but he is assuredly only
+their enemy in showing his Lutheran
+detestation of the sale of indulgences by
+broadcasting these gratis from his pulpit.</p>
+
+<p>The inconvenience and unpleasantness
+of a catechism concerning itself
+with the personal practice as well as
+the general theory of duty, are indeed
+perfectly conceivable by me; yet I am
+not convinced that such manner of catechism
+would therefore be less medicinal;
+and during the past ten years it
+has often been matter of amazed
+thought with me, while our President<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_315" id="Page_315">315</a></span>
+at Corpus read prayers to the chapel
+benches, what might by this time have
+been the effect on the learning as well
+as the creed of the University, if, forty
+years ago, our stern old Dean Gaisford,
+of the House of Christ, instead of sending
+us to chapel as to the house of
+correction, when we missed a lecture,
+had inquired, before he allowed us to
+come to chapel at all, whether we were
+gamblers, harlot-mongers, or in concealed
+and selfish debt.</p>
+
+<p>I observe with extreme surprise in
+the preceding letters the unconsciousness
+of some of your correspondents,
+that there ever was such a thing as
+discipline in the Christian Church.
+Indeed, the last wholesome instance
+of it I can remember was when my
+own great-great uncle Maitland lifted
+Lady &mdash;&mdash; from his altar rails, and
+led her back to her seat before the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_316" id="Page_316">316</a></span>
+congregation, when she offered to take
+the Sacrament, being at enmity with
+her son.<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a> But I believe a few hours
+honestly spent by any clergyman on
+his Church history would show him
+that the Church's confidence in her
+prayer has been always exactly proportionate
+to the strictness of her discipline;
+that her present fright at being
+caught praying by a chemist or an
+electrician, results mainly from her
+having allowed her twos and threes
+gathered in the name of Christ to become
+sixes and sevens gathered in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_317" id="Page_317">317</a></span>
+name of Belial; and that therefore her
+now needfullest duty is to explain to
+her stammering votaries, extremely
+doubtful as they are of the effect of
+their supplications either on politics or
+the weather, that although Elijah was
+a man subject to like passions as we
+are, he had them better under command;
+and that while the effectual
+fervent prayer of a righteous man
+availeth much, the formal and lukewarm
+one of an iniquitous man availeth&mdash;much
+the other way.</p>
+
+
+
+<p>Such an instruction, coupled with due
+explanation of the nature of righteousness
+and iniquity, directed mainly to
+those who have the power of both in
+their own hands, being makers of law,
+and holders of property, would, without
+any further debate, bring about a very
+singular change in the position and
+respectability of English clergymen.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_318" id="Page_318">318</a></span></p>
+
+<p>How far they may at present be considered
+as merely the Squire's left hand,
+bound to know nothing of what he is
+doing with his right, it is for their own
+consciences to determine.</p>
+
+<p>For instance, a friend wrote to me
+the other day, "Will you not come
+here? You will see a noble duke destroying
+a village as old as the Conquest,
+and driving out dozens of families whose
+names are in Domesday Book, because,
+owing to the neglect of his ancestors
+and rackrenting for a hundred years,
+the place has fallen out of repair, and
+the people are poor, and may become
+paupers. A local paper ventured to tell
+the truth. The duke's agent called
+on the editor, and threatened him with
+destruction if he did not hold his
+tongue." The noble duke, doubtless,
+has proper Protestant horror of auricular
+confession. But suppose, instead of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_319" id="Page_319">319</a></span>
+the local editor, the local parson had
+ventured to tell the truth from his
+pulpit, and even to intimate to his
+Grace that he might no longer receive
+the Body and Blood of the Lord at the
+altar of that parish. The parson would
+scarcely&mdash;in these days&mdash;have been
+therefore made bonfire of, and had a
+pretty martyr's memorial by Mr. Scott's
+pupils; but he would have lighted a
+goodly light, nevertheless, in this England
+of ours, whose pettifogging piety
+has now neither the courage to deny
+a duke's grace in its church, nor to
+declare Christ's in its Parliament.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly. Several of your contributors,
+I observe, have rashly dipped their feet
+in the brim of the water of that raging
+question of Usury; and I cannot but
+express my extreme regret that you
+should yourself have yielded to the
+temptation of expressing opinions which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_320" id="Page_320">320</a></span>
+you have had no leisure either to
+found or to test. My assertion, however,
+that the rich lived mainly by
+robbing the poor, referred not to Usury,
+but to Rent; and the facts respecting
+both these methods of extortion are
+perfectly and indubitably ascertainable
+by any person who himself wishes to
+ascertain them, and is able to take the
+necessary time and pains. I see no
+sign, throughout the whole of these
+letters, of any wish whatever, on the
+part of one of their writers, to ascertain
+the facts, but only to defend practices
+which they hold to be convenient in the
+world, and are afraid to blame in their
+congregations. Of the presumption
+with which several of the writers utter
+their notions on the subject, I do not
+think it would be right to speak farther,
+in an epilogue to which there is no
+reply, in the terms which otherwise<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_321" id="Page_321">321</a></span>
+would have been deserved. In their
+bearing on other topics, let me earnestly
+thank you (so far as my own feelings
+may be permitted voice in the matter) for
+the attention with which you have examined,
+and the courage with which you
+have ratified, or at least endured, letters
+which could not but bear at first the aspect
+of being written in a hostile&mdash;sometimes
+even in a mocking spirit. That aspect
+is untrue, nor am I answerable for it:
+the things of which I had to speak
+could not be shortly described but in
+terms which might sound satirical; for
+all error, if frankly shown, is precisely
+most ridiculous when it is most dangerous,
+and I have written no word which
+is not chosen as the exactest for its
+occasion, whether it move sigh or smile.
+In my earlier days I wrote much with
+the desire to please, and the hope of
+influencing the reader. As I grow<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_322" id="Page_322">322</a></span>
+older and older, I recognize the truth
+of the Preacher's saying, "Desire shall
+fail, and the mourners go about the
+streets;" and I content myself with
+saying, to whoso it may concern, that
+the thing is verily thus, whether they
+will hear or whether they will forbear.
+No man more than I has ever loved
+the places where God's honour dwells,
+or yielded truer allegiance to the teaching
+of His evident servants. No man
+at this time grieves more for the danger
+of the Church which supposes him her
+enemy, while she whispers procrastinating
+<i>pax vobiscum</i> in answer to the
+spurious kiss of those who would fain
+toll curfew over the last fires of English
+faith, and watch the sparrow find
+nest where she may lay her young,
+around the altars of the Lord.</p>
+
+<div class="signature">
+Ever affectionately yours,<br />
+<span class="signlast">J. Ruskin.</span>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39">[39]</a> Only a heretic!&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40">[40]</a> I may perhaps be pardoned for vindicating at
+least my arithmetic, which, with Bishop Colenso, I
+rather pride myself upon. One of your correspondents
+greatly doubts my having heard five thousand assertors
+of evangelical principles (Catholic-absolvent or
+Protestant-detergent are virtually the same). I am
+now sixty years old, and for forty-five of them was in
+church at least once on the Sunday,&mdash;say once a month
+also in afternoons,&mdash;and you have above three thousand
+church services. When I am abroad I am often
+in half-a-dozen churches in the course of a single day,
+and never lose a chance of listening to anything that
+is going on. Add the conversations pursued, not unearnestly,
+with every sort of reverend person I can
+get to talk to me&mdash;from the Bishop of Strasburg
+(as good a specimen of a town bishop as I have
+known), with whom I was studying ecstatic paintings
+in the year 1850&mdash;down to the simplest travelling
+tinker inclined Gospelwards, whom I perceive to be
+sincere, and your correspondent will perceive that my
+rapid numerical expression must be far beneath the
+truth. He subjoins his more rational doubt of my
+acquaintance with many town missionaries; to which
+I can only answer, that as I do not live in town, nor
+set up for a missionary myself, my spiritual advantages
+have certainly not been great in that direction.
+I simply assert that of the few I have known,&mdash;beginning
+with Mr. Spurgeon, under whom I sat with much
+edification for a year or two,&mdash;I have not known any
+such teaching as I speak of.
+</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41">[41]</a> See Appendix.</p></div>
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42">[42]</a> See in the Appendix for more of these beautiful
+prayers.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p>
+<a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_43_43">[43]</a> The only explanation ever
+offered for this exuberant
+wordiness is that if worshippers did not understand
+one term they would the other, and in some
+cases, in the Exhortation and elsewhere, one word is
+of Latin and the other of Saxon derivation.
+<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a> But
+this is surely a very feeble excuse for bad composition.
+Of a very different kind is that beautiful climax which
+is reached in the three admirably chosen pairs of
+words in the Prayer for the Parliament, "peace and
+happiness, truth and justice, religion
+and piety."&mdash;<span class="smcap">Editor.</span></p></div>
+
+
+
+
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44">[44]</a> The repetition of synonymous terms is of very frequent
+occurrence in sixteenth century writing, as "for ever and
+aye," "Time and the hour ran through the roughest day"
+(Macbeth, i. 3).</p></div>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a>
+<a href="#FNanchor_45_45">[45]</a> In some of the country districts of Scotland the
+right of the Church to interfere with the lives of
+private individuals is still exercised. Only two years
+ago, a wealthy gentleman farmer was rebuked by the
+"Kirk Session" of the Dissenting Church to which
+he belonged, for infidelity to his wife.
+</p><p>
+At the Scottish half-yearly Communion the ceremony
+of "fencing the tables" used to be observed; that is,
+turning away all those whose lives were supposed to
+have made them unfit to receive the Sacrament.</p></div>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_323" id="Page_323">323</a></span></p>
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<p><span class="sidelink"><a href="#CONTENTS">ToC</a></span></p>
+
+<h2><a name="APPENDIX" id="APPENDIX"></a>APPENDIX</h2>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_325" id="Page_325">325</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+
+
+<p>Mr. Ruskin having kindly entrusted me with
+his valuable English thirteenth century MS.
+service book, referred to p. 295, I have thought
+it would be interesting to the readers of this
+volume to see a little more in detail some of
+the origins of our Litany and Collects. I
+think it will be owned that our Reformers
+failed to mend some of them in the translation.
+I am quite unversed in the reading of ancient
+MSS., but I hope the following, with the
+translation, will not be found incorrect. I
+have preserved neither the contractions nor
+the responses repeated after each petition, and
+have changed the mediæval "e" into "æ,"
+as "terre" into "terræ."&mdash;<span class="smcap">Editor.</span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p>Ut dompnum apostolicum et omnes gradus
+ecclesiæ in sancta religione conservare digneris.</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Te rogamus, audi nos, Domine.</i><br />
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_326" id="Page_326">326</a></span></div>
+
+<p>Ut episcopum nostrum et gregem sibi commissum
+conservare digneris.</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Te rogamus....</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>Ut regi nostro et principibus nostris pacem
+et veram concordiam atque victoriam, donare
+digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut episcopos et abbates nostros et congregationes
+illis commissas in sancta religione conservare
+digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut congregationes omnium sanctorum in tuo
+sancto servitio conservare digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut cunctum populum Christianum precioso sanguine
+tuo conservare digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut omnibus benefactoribus nostris sempiterna
+bona retribuas.</p>
+
+<p>Ut animas nostras et parentum nostrorum ab
+eterna dampnatione eripias.</p>
+
+<p>Ut mentes nostras ad celestia desideria erigas.</p>
+
+<p>Ut obsequium servitutis nostræ rationabile
+facias.</p>
+
+<p>Ut locum istum et omnes habitantes in eo visitare
+et consolari digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut fructus terræ dare et conservare digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut inimicos sanctæ Dei ecclesiæ comprimere
+digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut oculos misericordiæ tuæ super nos reducere
+digneris.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_327" id="Page_327">327</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Ut miserias pauperum et captivorum intueri et
+relevare digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Ut omnibus fidelibus defunctis requiem eternam
+dones.</p>
+
+<p>Ut nos exaudire digneris.</p>
+
+<p>Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Parce nobis Domine.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Exaudi nos.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Miserere nobis.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>Deus cui proprium est misereri semper et parcere
+suscipe deprecationem nostram et quos delictorum
+cathena constringit misericordia tuæ pietatis absolvas,
+per Jesum Christum.</p>
+
+<p>Ecclesiæ tuæ Domine, preces placatus admitte
+ut destructis adversitatibus universis secura tibi
+serviat libertate.</p>
+
+<p>Omnipotens sempiterne Deus qui facis mirabilia
+magna solus pretende super famulum tuum episcopum
+nostrum et super cunctas congregationes illi
+commissas spiritum gratiæ tuæ salutaris et ut in
+veritate tibi complaceant perpetuum eis rorem tuæ
+benedictionis infunde, per Jesum.</p>
+
+<p>Deus in cujus manu corda sunt regum qui es
+humilium consolator et fidelium fortitudo et protector
+omnium in te sperantium, da regi nostro et<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_328" id="Page_328">328</a></span>
+reginæ populoque Christiano, triumphum virtutis
+tuæ scienter excolere, ut per te semper reparentur
+ad veniam.</p>
+
+<p>Pretende Domine et famulis et famulabus tuis
+dexteram celestis auxilii ut te toto corde propinquant
+atque digne postulationes assequantur.</p>
+
+<p>Deus a quo sancta desideria recta consilia et
+justa sunt opera, da servis tuis illam quam mundus
+dare non potest pacem ut et corda nostra mandatis
+tuis et hostium ublata formidine tempora sint tua
+protectione tranquilla.</p>
+
+<p>Ure igne sancti spiritus renes nostros et cor
+nostrum, Domine, ut tibi corde casto serviamus et
+mundo corpore placeamus.</p>
+
+
+<h4>Translation</h4>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to keep the apostolic
+lord (<i>i.e.</i> the Pope) and all ranks of the Church in
+Thy holy religion.</p>
+
+<div class="indent"><i>O Lord, we beseech Thee, hear us.</i></div>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to keep our bishop, and
+the flock committed to him.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to give to our king and
+our princes (or chief lords), peace, and true concord,
+and victory.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_329" id="Page_329">329</a></span></p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to keep our bishops
+and abbots, and the congregations committed to
+them, in holy religion.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to keep the congregations
+of all saints in Thy holy service.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to keep the whole
+Christian people with Thy precious blood.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to requite all our benefactors
+with everlasting blessings.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to preserve our
+souls and the souls of our kindred from eternal
+damnation.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee that Thou wouldest
+lift up our hearts to heavenly desires.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to make the obedience
+of our service reasonable.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to visit and to comfort
+this place, and all who dwell in it.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to give and preserve
+the fruits of the earth.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to restrain the enemies
+of the Holy Church of God.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to look upon us with
+eyes of mercy.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to behold and
+relieve the miseries of the poor and the
+prisoners.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_330" id="Page_330">330</a></span></p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to give eternal peace
+to all the faithful departed.</p>
+
+<p>That it may please Thee to hear us.</p>
+
+<p>Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the
+world.</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Spare us, O Lord.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the
+world.</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Hear us, O Lord.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the
+world.</p>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<i>Have mercy on us, O Lord.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p>O God, whose property it is always to pity and
+to spare, receive our supplications, and by the
+mercy of Thy fatherly love, loose those whom the
+chain of their sins keeps bound, through Jesus
+Christ our Lord.</p>
+
+<p>O Lord, receive with indulgence the prayers of
+Thy Church, that all adversities being overcome,
+it may serve Thee in freedom without fear.</p>
+
+<p>Almighty, Eternal God, who alone doest great
+wonders, grant to Thy servant our bishop, and
+to all the congregations committed to him, the
+healthful spirit of Thy grace; and that they may
+please Thee in truth, pour out upon them the
+perpetual dew of Thy blessing.</p>
+
+<p>O God, in whose hand are the hearts of kings,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_331" id="Page_331">331</a></span>
+who art the consoler of the meek and the strength
+of the faithful, and the protector of all that trust
+in Thee, give to our king and queen and to the
+Christian people wisely to manifest the glory of
+Thy power, that by Thee they may ever be restored
+to forgiveness.</p>
+
+<p>Extend, O Lord, over Thy servants and handmaidens,
+the right hand of Thy heavenly aid, that
+they may draw near unto Thee with all their heart,
+and worthily obtain their petitions.</p>
+
+<p>Kindle with the fire of Thy Holy Spirit our
+reins and our hearts, O Lord, that we may serve
+Thee with a clean heart, and please Thee with a
+pure body.</p>
+
+<p>O God, from whom are all holy desires, right
+counsels, and just works, give unto Thy servants
+that peace which the world cannot give, that both
+our hearts (may obey) Thy commands, and the
+fear of the enemy being taken away, we may have
+quiet times by Thy protection.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p>Upon one of the blank leaves of this MS.
+are some interesting remarks upon its probable
+date, furnished by Mr. Ruskin himself.
+"The style, and pieces of inner evidence in
+all this book speak it clearly of the first half of
+the thirteenth century. The architecture is all<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_332" id="Page_332">332</a></span>
+round arched&mdash;the roofs of Norman simplicity&mdash;unpinnacled&mdash;the
+severe and simple forms
+of letter are essentially Norman, and the leaf
+and ball terminations of the spiral of the extremities,
+exactly intermediate between the
+Norman and Gothic types. The ivy and geranium
+leaves begin to show themselves long
+before the end of the thirteenth century, and
+there is not a trace of them in this book."
+This evidence of early date, however, is qualified
+by the further statement, "old styles
+sometimes hold on long in provincial MSS."</p>
+
+<div class="right">
+J. RUSKIN.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</div>
+
+<div class="indent">
+<span class="smcap">Brantwood</span>, <i>April 14th</i>, 1881.<br />
+&nbsp;<br />
+&nbsp;<br />
+&nbsp;<br />
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="center">
+THE END<br />
+&nbsp;<br />
+&nbsp;<br />
+&nbsp;<br />
+</div>
+
+<div class="smallcent">
+<i>Printed by</i> <span class="smcap">Ballantyne, Hanson &amp; Co.</span><br />
+<i>Edinburgh and London</i><br />
+</div>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+<h2><a name="WORKS_BY_JOHN_RUSKIN" id="WORKS_BY_JOHN_RUSKIN"></a><i>WORKS BY JOHN RUSKIN</i></h2>
+
+
+<p class="ad">MODERN PAINTERS. In 5 vols. with all the Woodcuts,
+1 Lithograph, and the 89 Full-Page Steel Engravings.
+The text is that of the 1873 Edition, with Notes, and a New
+Epilogue. Cloth, £6, 6<i>s.</i> the 5 vols., imp. 8vo.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE STONES OF VENICE. Complete Edition.
+(Imperial 8vo.) 3 vols. with the 53 Plates and the Text as
+originally issued, and Index. Cloth, £4, 4<i>s.</i> the 3 vols.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">EXAMPLES OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF
+VENICE. With the Text and the 16 Plates as originally
+published. Cloth cover (unbound), atlas folio (about 25 in.
+by 17 in.), £2, 2<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE POETRY OF ARCHITECTURE; or, The
+Architecture of the Nations of Europe considered in its Association
+with Natural Scenery and National Character. With
+Frontispiece in Colour, 14 Plates in Photogravure, and 9 Full-Page
+and other Woodcuts. 4to, cloth, 21<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">VERONA, AND OTHER LECTURES. Delivered
+principally at the Royal and London Institutions between 1870
+and 1883. With Frontispiece in colour and 11 Photogravure
+Plates. Med. 8vo, cloth, 15<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">ON THE OLD ROAD: a Collection of Miscellaneous
+Pamphlets, Articles, and Essays (1834-84). In 3 vols., 8vo,
+cloth, 30<i>s.</i> (Not sold separately.)</p>
+
+<p class="ad">ARROWS OF THE CHACE: being a Collection of
+the Scattered Letters of John Ruskin (1840-1880). With
+Preface. In 2 vols. cloth, 8vo, 20<i>s.</i> (Not sold separately.)</p>
+
+<p class="ad">PRÆTERITA. Outlines of Scenes and Thoughts
+perhaps Worthy of Memory in my Past Life. Vols. I. and II.
+of this autobiography now ready, in cloth, 13<i>s.</i> each, med. 8vo.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE ART OF ENGLAND. Six Lectures delivered
+at Oxford in 1883. With Appendix and Index. Cloth, 6<i>s.</i>, 4to.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">UNTO THIS LAST. Four Essays on the First
+Principles of Political Economy. Tenth Edition. Cloth, 3<i>s.</i>;
+roan, gilt edges, 4<i>s.</i>, fcap. 8vo.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">SELECTIONS FROM RUSKIN. 2 vols. crown 8vo,
+with Index. (Sold separately), cloth, 6<i>s.</i> each; roan, gilt
+edges, 8<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> each.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">The First Series</span>
+(from Works written between 1843 and
+1860), with engraved Portrait.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">The Second Series</span> (from Works written between 1860 and
+1888), with Photogravure Portrait.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="ApPage_2" id="ApPage_2">2</a></span></p>
+
+<p class="ad">FRONDES AGRESTES. Readings in "Modern
+Painters." Thirteenth Edition. Cloth, 3<i>s.</i>; roan, gilt edges, 4<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class="smallcent">
+<i>Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. each; roan, gilt edges, 7s. 6d. each.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p class="ad">SESAME AND LILIES. A Small Complete Edition,
+containing the Three Lectures, with long Preface and Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">MUNERA PULVERIS. Six Essays on the Elements
+of Political Economy. Second Edition, with Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">The EAGLE'S NEST. Ten Lectures on the Relation
+of Natural Science to Art. Third Edition, with Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">TIME and TIDE, by WEARE and TYNE. Twenty-five
+Letters to a Working Man of Sunderland on Laws of
+Work. Fourth Edition, with Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">The CROWN of WILD OLIVE. Four Essays on
+Work, Traffic, War, and the Future of England. With Articles
+on the Economy of the Kings of Prussia. Ninth Edition, with
+Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">QUEEN of the AIR: a Study of the Greek Myths of
+Cloud and Storm. Sixth Edition, with Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">The TWO PATHS. Lectures on Art and its Application
+to Decoration and Manufacture. Delivered in 1858-59.
+With New Preface and Added Notes. Third Edition.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">"A JOY FOR EVER" (and its Price in the Market).
+The Substance of Two Lectures on the Political Economy of
+Art. With New Preface and Added Articles. Third Edition,
+with Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">LECTURES on ART, delivered at Oxford in 1870.
+With Preface. Seventh Edition, with Index.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">The ETHICS of the DUST. Ten Lectures to Little
+Housewives on the Elements of Crystallisation. Eighth Edition.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">The ELEMENTS of DRAWING. In Three Letters
+to Beginners, with Index. Illustrated.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">The STONES of VENICE: Selections for the Use of
+Travellers. 2 vols. cloth, 5<i>s.</i> each. Sixth Edition, with Index.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="ApPage_3" id="ApPage_3">3</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class="smallcent">
+<i>Small post 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d. each; roan, gilt edges, 10s. each,<br />
+complete with all the Plates.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<p class="ad">The SEVEN LAMPS of ARCHITECTURE. The 14
+Plates for this Edition have been specially prepared from the
+larger Work. Sixth Edition.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">ARATRA PENTILICI: Seven Lectures on the
+Elements of Sculpture. With 1 Engraving on Steel and 20
+Autotype Plates.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">VAL D'ARNO. Ten Lectures on Art of the Thirteenth
+Century in Pisa and Florence. With 1 Steel Engraving and 12
+Autotype Plates.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">ARIADNE FLORENTINA: Six Lectures on Wood
+and Metal Engraving, and Appendix. With 4 Full-Page Facsimiles
+from Holbein's "Dance of Death," and 12 Autotype
+Plates.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">LECTURES on ARCHITECTURE and PAINTING.
+Delivered at Edinburgh in November, 1853. With 15 Full-Page
+Illustrations drawn by the Author.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE HARBOURS OF ENGLAND. With the 12
+Illustrations by <span class="smcap">Turner</span>, reproduced in Photogravure, and an
+Introduction by <span class="smcap">T. J. Wise</span>.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p class="ad">FORS CLAVIGERA: Letters to the Labourers and
+Workmen of Great Britain. A New Cheap Edition, with all
+the Illustrations. In Four Volumes, each with an Index,
+crown 8vo, cloth, 6<i>s.</i> each; roan, gilt edges, 8<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> each.</p>
+
+<div class="smallcent">
+<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="3" summary="">
+
+<tr>
+
+<td align="left"><span class="smcap">Vol. I.</span> containing Letters I. to
+XXIV., 530 pages.</td>
+
+<td align="right"> <i>Just out.</i></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><span class="smcap">Vol. II.</span> containing Letters XXV. to
+XLVIII., about 500 pages. </td>
+
+<td align="right"><i>In May.</i><br /></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+<td align="left"><span class="smcap">Vol. III.</span> containing Letters XLIX. to LXXII.</td>
+
+<td align="right" rowspan="2"><i>In the Autumn.</i></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+<td align="left"><span class="smcap">Vol. IV.</span> containing Letters LXXIII. to XCVI.</td>
+</tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+<p class="ad">LETTERS TO THE CLERGY: On the Lord's Prayer
+and the Church. Edited by Rev. <span class="smcap">F. A. Malleson</span>. Third
+Edition, with Additional Letters by Mr. <span class="smcap">Ruskin</span>, crown 8vo,
+cloth, 5<i>s.</i> The last Edition, published in 1883, has long been
+out of print.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">THREE LETTERS and AN ESSAY on LITERATURE,
+1836-1841. Found in his Tutor's Desk. Crown 8vo,
+cloth, 3<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">LETTERS TO A COLLEGE FRIEND, 1840-1845,
+including an Essay on "Death before Adam Fell." Crown 8vo,
+cloth, 4<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">HORTUS INCLUSUS. Messages from the Wood to
+the Garden. Being Letters to the Sister Ladies of the Thwaite,
+Coniston. Second Edition. Cloth, 4<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="ApPage_4" id="ApPage_4">4</a></span></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE OXFORD MUSEUM. By Sir <span class="smcap">Henry Acland</span>.
+With Letters from <span class="smcap">John Ruskin</span> and New Preface by Sir
+<span class="smcap">Henry Acland</span>. With Portrait of Mr. Ruskin, taken in 1893,
+an Engraving of Capital, and a Plan. Crown 8vo, cloth, 4<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">RUSKIN ON MUSIC: being Extracts from the Works
+of <span class="smcap">John Ruskin</span>. Intended for the Use of all interested in the
+Art of Music.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">Edited by Miss <span class="smcap">A. M. Wakefield</span>. With Frontispiece
+in Colour. Med. 8vo, cloth, 5s. net; half-parchment, 6<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>
+net.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">STUDIES IN RUSKIN: Some Aspects of Mr.
+Ruskin's Work and Teaching. By <span class="smcap">Edward T. Cook</span>. 13
+Woodcuts. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5<i>s.</i>; roan, gilt edges, 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>
+Second Edition.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">Also a Large-Paper Edition, crown 4to, price 12<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>
+Containing, in addition to the Woodcuts, 13 Autotypes of
+Drawings by Mr. <span class="smcap">Ruskin</span>. With Descriptive Text.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE PRINCIPLES OF ART. As Illustrated by
+Examples in the Ruskin Museum at Sheffield. Compiled by
+<span class="smcap">William White</span> from Mr. Ruskin's Works, with some
+unpublished Matter and 6 Photogravure Plates. Demy 8vo,
+10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> net.</p>
+
+<h2><i>MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS</i></h2>
+
+<p class="ad">OLD FRENCH ROMANCES. Done into English
+by <span class="smcap">William Morris</span>. With an Introduction by <span class="smcap">Joseph
+Jacobs</span>.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">"King Coustans the Emperor. The Friendship of Amis
+and Amile. King Floras and the Fair Jehane. Story of Over
+Sea." Crown 8vo, cloth, gilt top, 4<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> net.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">THROUGH THE DOLOMITES, from VENICE to
+TOBLACH. A Practical, Historical, and Descriptive Guide-Book.
+By the Rev. <span class="smcap">Alexander Robertson, D.D.</span> (of
+Venice).</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">With 42 Full-Page Illustrations reproduced from Pictures by
+<span class="smcap">W. Logsdail</span>, <span class="smcap">H. G. Keasbey</span>, and from Photographs, with
+a Map of the District. Also an Appendix giving Tables of
+Railway and Diligence Stations, Times, Fares, &amp;c., Carriage
+Tariffs, Charges for Guides, Hotels, &amp;c. Small crown 8vo,
+cloth, 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="noindent">This is intended to be a supplementary volume to Mr.
+<span class="smcap">Hare's</span> "Cities of Northern Italy," and is the only guide of
+the kind dealing with the great highway through that beautiful
+mountain district, which is becoming more and more the resort
+of travellers.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="ApPage_5" id="ApPage_5">5</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<p class="ad">"AS OTHERS SEE US." A Series of Volumes giving
+Impressions of England and of English Life by various Continental
+Authors. Edited by <span class="smcap">Joseph Jacobs</span>. Crown 8vo,
+cloth, 5<i>s.</i> each.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">I. THE ENGLAND OF TO-DAY. From the Portuguese
+of <span class="smcap">Oliveira Martins</span>. Translated by <span class="smcap">C. J. Willdey</span>,
+340 pages.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">II. ACROSS THE CHANNEL. From the French of
+<span class="smcap">Gabriel Mourey</span> ("<span class="smcap">Gil Blas</span>").</p>
+
+<div class="center"><i>OTHER VOLUMES TO FOLLOW.</i></div>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<div class="ad">BROWNING AND THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.
+On the Evidences of Christianity from Browning's Point of
+View. By <span class="smcap">Edward Berdoe</span>. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s.; 256
+pages.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[<i>Just out.</i></div>
+
+
+
+<p class="ad">BROWNING STUDIES. By Bishop <span class="smcap">Westcott</span>,
+Professor <span class="smcap">Corson</span>, Mrs. <span class="smcap">Ireland</span>, and other Members of
+the Browning Society. With an Introduction by <span class="smcap">Edward
+Berdoe</span>. Demy 8vo, cloth, 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">SPENSER'S "FAERIE QUEENE." With over 90
+Full-page Illustrations, besides 150 Headings and Tailpieces
+by <span class="smcap">Walter Crane</span>.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">A limited Edition on Arnold's Hand-made Paper, large post
+4to, in NINETEEN Monthly Parts, price 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> net each
+Part. No odd Parts supplied separately.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">The Text (which has been collated from Four Editions,
+including that of 1590) is edited by <span class="smcap">Thomas J. Wise</span>.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">Books</span> I. to IV., price £1, 11<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> each; cloth, £1, 14<i>s.</i> each.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">Part XIII.</span>, with 4 Full-page Designs, 5 Canto Headings,
+and 4 Tailpieces.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[<i>Just out.</i></p>
+
+
+<p class="ad">THE MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR. In Eight
+Designs. By <span class="smcap">Walter Crane</span>. Printed on Japanese silk
+paper, and mounted on cardboard. Each copy is signed by
+Mr. <span class="smcap">Crane</span> and numbered. Buckram, gilt top, plates guarded,
+imperial 4to, 21<i>s.</i> net.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">OLD-WORLD JAPAN: Legends of the Land of the
+Gods. By <span class="smcap">Frank Rinder</span>. With 34 Pictures and Cover
+designed by <span class="smcap">T. H. Robinson</span>. Cloth, gilt top, 6<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">JACOB AND THE RAVEN. By <span class="smcap">Frances Mary
+Peard</span>. With other Stories for Children, and 39 Illustrations
+by <span class="smcap">Heywood Sumner</span>. Large crown 8vo, cloth, gilt edges, 5<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE HISTORY OF HUON OF BORDEAUX: A
+Legend of the Time of Charlemagne. By <span class="smcap">Robert Steele</span>.
+With 22 Illustrations by <span class="smcap">Fred. Mason</span>. Antique Paper.
+Fcap. 4to, cloth, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="ApPage_6" id="ApPage_6">6</a></span></p>
+
+<p class="ad">PRIDE AND PREJUDICE. By <span class="smcap">Jane Austen</span>.
+With 100 Illustrations by <span class="smcap">Hugh Thomson</span>, and an Introduction
+by <span class="smcap">George Saintsbury</span>. Crown 8vo, cloth gilt, 6<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">MARMONTEL'S MORAL TALES. Selected and
+Re-translated, with Biographical and Critical Introduction and
+Notes by <span class="smcap">George Saintsbury</span>, and 45 Illustrations by <span class="smcap">Chris.
+Hammond</span>. Crown 8vo, cloth, gilt top or edges, 6<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">SIR CHARLES GRANDISON. By <span class="smcap">Samuel
+Richardson</span>. The Letters being Selected and Arranged to
+form a connected Narrative, with Biographical and Critical
+Introduction and Notes, by <span class="smcap">George Saintsbury</span>, and 60
+Drawings by <span class="smcap">Chris. Hammond</span>. In 2 vols., crown 8vo, cloth,
+gilt tops or edges, 12<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">HANS ANDERSEN'S STORIES AND FAIRY
+TALES. Translated by <span class="smcap">H. Oskar Sommer</span>. With over One
+Hundred Pictures and Initial Letters by <span class="smcap">Arthur J. Gaskin</span>.
+In 2 vols., large crown 8vo, 6<i>s.</i> each. Sold separately.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">A few of the Special Large-Paper Copies on Arnold's Hand-made
+Paper still remain. Crown 4to, £2, 2<i>s.</i> net, the 2 vols.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">LEGENDS FROM RIVER AND MOUNTAIN.
+Translated from the Roumanian and German by <span class="smcap">Carmen
+Sylva</span> (H.M. the Queen of Roumania) and <span class="smcap">Alma Strettell</span>.
+With 40 Illustrations by <span class="smcap">T. H. Robinson</span>. Large crown 8vo,
+cloth, gilt top, 6<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">SLAV TALES. Translated from the French of
+<span class="smcap">Chodsko</span>, and Illustrated with 60 Drawings by <span class="smcap">Emily J.
+Harding</span>. Large crown 8vo, cloth, gilt top, 6<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE MEMORIES AND THOUGHTS OF A LIFE.
+By Judge <span class="smcap">O'Connor Morris</span>. This book is chiefly conversant
+with Ireland during the last Sixty Years. Demy 8vo, cloth.
+12<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>, with Portrait.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">LULLABIES OF MANY LANDS. Collected and
+rendered into English by <span class="smcap">Alma Strettell</span>. With 77 Illustrations
+and specially designed Cover by <span class="smcap">Emily Harding</span>.
+Fcap. 4to, cloth, 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE DISAGREEABLE DUKE. A Christmas Whimsicality
+for Holiday Girls and Boys. By <span class="smcap">Ellinor Davenport
+Adams</span>. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">A MODEL WIFE, AND OTHER STORIES. By
+Mrs. <span class="smcap">Comyns Carr</span>. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF THOMAS
+PELHAM DALE. By <span class="smcap">Helen Pelham Dale</span>. With 4
+Photogravure Portraits, 6 Plates in Colour, and other Illustrations.
+In 2 vols., crown 8vo, cloth, 12<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">SONGS OF A PARISH PRIEST. By Rev. <span class="smcap">Basil
+Edwards</span>. With Woodcut of Churchyard Cross. Third
+Edition. Fcap. 8vo, parchment, 2<i>s.</i>; cloth, 2<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="ApPage_7" id="ApPage_7">7</a></span></p>
+
+
+<p class="ad">REVOLUTION AND REACTION IN MODERN
+FRANCE. By <span class="smcap">G. Lowes Dickinson</span>. The Substance of
+Lectures dealing with the History of France, from 1789 to
+1871. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">A BOOK OF PICTURED CAROLS. With 12 Full-Page
+Designs by Members of the Birmingham Art School.
+Hand-printed on Hand-made Paper, 74 pages. Fcap. 4to, 5<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE GARDEN OF JAPAN: a Year's Diary of its
+Flowers. By <span class="smcap">F. T. Piggott</span>, M.A. With Two Full-Page
+Plates of Japanese Flowers in Colour, and other Illustrations
+by the Author, including some Coloured Ornaments on Title-Pages.
+Also Four Pictures by <span class="smcap">Alfred East</span>, R.I. Hand-printed,
+demy 4to, Japanese Vellum, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+
+<h2><i>WORKS BY AUGUSTUS J. C. HARE</i></h2>
+
+<p class="ad">LIFE AND LETTERS OF FRANCES, BARONESS
+BUNSEN. Third Edition. With Portraits. 2 vols., crown
+8vo, 21<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">MEMORIALS OF A QUIET LIFE. 3 vols., crown
+8vo. Vols. I. and II., 21<i>s.</i> (Nineteenth Edition); Vol. III.,
+with numerous Photographs, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">DAYS NEAR ROME. With more than 100 Illustrations
+by the Author. Third Edition. 2 vols., crown 8vo, 12<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">WALKS IN ROME. Thirteenth Edition, revised.
+With Map. 2 vols., fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 10<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">WALKS IN LONDON. Sixth Edition, revised. With
+additional Illustrations. 2 vols., fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 12<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">WESTMINSTER. Reprinted from "Walks in London,"
+as a Handy Guide. 120 pages. Paper covers, 6<i>d.</i> <i>net</i>; cloth, 1<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">WANDERINGS IN SPAIN. With 17 full-page Illustrations.
+Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo, 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">CITIES OF SOUTHERN ITALY AND SICILY.
+With Illustrations. Crown 8vo, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">CITIES OF NORTHERN ITALY. Second Edition.
+With Illustrations. 2 vols., crown 8vo, 12<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">CITIES OF CENTRAL ITALY. Second Edition.
+With Illustrations. 2 vols., crown 8vo, 12<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">SKETCHES IN HOLLAND AND SCANDINAVIA.
+Crown 8vo, with Illustrations, 3<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="ApPage_8" id="ApPage_8">8</a></span></p>
+
+<p class="ad">STUDIES IN RUSSIA. Crown 8vo, with numerous
+Illustrations, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">FLORENCE. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, Illustrated,
+cloth limp, 3<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">VENICE. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 3<i>s.</i>
+With Illustrations.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">PARIS. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10<i>s.</i>; or
+in 2 vols, cloth limp, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">DAYS NEAR PARIS. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo,
+cloth, 10<i>s.</i>; or in 2 vols., cloth limp, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">NORTH-EASTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth,
+10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> With Map and 86 Woodcuts. 532 pages.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">Picardy&mdash;Abbeville and
+Amiens&mdash;Paris and its Environs&mdash;Arras and the
+Manufacturing Towns of the North&mdash;Champagne&mdash;Nancy
+and the Vosges, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">SOUTH-EASTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth,
+10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> With Map and 176 Woodcuts. 600 pages.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">The different lines to the South&mdash;Burgundy&mdash;Auvergne&mdash;The Cantal&mdash;Provence&mdash;The
+Alpes Dauphinaises and Alpes Maritimes; &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">SOUTH-WESTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth,
+10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> With Map and 232 Woodcuts. 664 pages.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">The Loire&mdash;The Gironde and Landes&mdash;Creuse&mdash;Corrèze&mdash;The Limousin&mdash;Gascony
+and Languedoc&mdash;The Cevennes and the Pyrenees, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">NORTH-WESTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth,
+10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> With Map and 73 Woodcuts. 410 pages.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">Normandy and Brittany&mdash;Rouen&mdash;Dieppe&mdash;Cherbourg&mdash;Bayeux&mdash;Caen&mdash;Coutances&mdash;Chartres&mdash;Mont
+S. Michel&mdash;Dinan&mdash;Brest&mdash;Alençon, &amp;c.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">SUSSEX. With Map and 40 Woodcuts. Crown 8vo,
+cloth, 6<i>s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE STORY OF TWO NOBLE LIVES: <span class="smcap">Charlotte</span>,
+<span class="smcap">Countess Canning</span>, and <span class="smcap">Louisa, Marchioness of
+Waterford</span>. In 3 vols. of about 450 pages each. Crown
+8vo, cloth, £1, 11<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> 32 Plates in Photogravure from Lady
+Waterford's Drawings, and 32 Woodcuts.</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">Also a Special Large-Paper Edition, with India Proofs of the
+Plates. Crown 4to, £3, 3<i>s.</i> net.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">THE GURNEYS OF EARLHAM: Being Memoirs
+and Letters of the Eleven Children of <span class="smcap">John</span> and <span class="smcap">Catherine
+Gurney</span> of Earlham, 1775-1875, and the Story of their Religious
+Life under Many Different Forms. Illustrated with 33 Photogravure
+Plates and 19 Woodcuts. In 2 vols., crown 8vo, cloth,
+25<i>s.</i> 712 pages.</p>
+
+<p class="ad">BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES: Being Memorial
+Sketches of <span class="smcap">Arthur Penrhyn Stanley</span>, Dean of Westminster;
+<span class="smcap">Henry Alford</span>, Dean of Canterbury; Mrs. <span class="smcap">Duncan
+Stewart</span>; and <span class="smcap">Paray le Monial</span>. Illustrated with 7
+Portraits and 17 Woodcuts. 1 vol., crown 8vo, cloth, 8<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+
+
+
+<h4><i>GEORGE ALLEN, 156, CHARING CROSS ROAD, LONDON</i></h4>
+
+<h3>Transcriber's Notes</h3>
+
+<p>1. P. 37: "Mis-understanding" is chosen to be written with a hyphen ("But, at all events, it is surely the pastor's
+duty to prevent his flock from <i>mis</i>-understanding it...")
+</p>
+<p>2. P. 5 of the Appendix: "Miscellaneons" changed to "Miscellaneous" in the header of the page.
+</p>
+<p>3. The words that were chosen to be written with a hyphen: mustard-seed (p. 23), Janus-faced (p. 31), thorough-going (p. 116), slow-witted (p. 116),
+simple-minded (p. 126), so-called (p. 126), animad-versions (p. 245), Hand-made (p. 6, Appendix), Hand-printed (p. 7, Appendix)
+</p>
+<p>4. The words that were chosen to be written without a hyphen: overcrowding (p. 91),
+shortcomings (p. 172), overthrow (p. 178), widespread (p. 180).
+</p>
+<p>5. Added quotes (p. 153, '... for clerky people."').</p>
+
+<p>6. Added period after the Greek epigraph to letters VII (p. 19) and X (p. 36).</p>
+
+<p>7. Changed <span class="centgrk">á½€u</span> to <span class="centgrk">οá½</span>
+in <span class="centgrk">Î¿á½ Î³á½°Ï Î¼á½´ καθαÏίσῃ ... κύÏιος</span> (p. 16). </p>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Letters to the Clergy, by John Ruskin
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS TO THE CLERGY ***
+
+***** This file should be named 39283-h.htm or 39283-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/9/2/8/39283/
+
+Produced by Paul Murray, Elizaveta Shevyakhova and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/39283-h/images/i001.jpg b/39283-h/images/i001.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..276988a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39283-h/images/i001.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/39283.txt b/39283.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e3cdfa3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39283.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,7096 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Letters to the Clergy, by John Ruskin
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Letters to the Clergy
+ On The Lord's Prayer and the Church
+
+Author: John Ruskin
+
+Editor: F. A. Malleson
+
+Release Date: March 27, 2012 [EBook #39283]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS TO THE CLERGY ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Paul Murray, Elizaveta Shevyakhova and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ LETTERS
+ TO THE CLERGY
+
+ ON
+
+ _The Lord's Prayer and the Church_
+
+ BY JOHN RUSKIN, LL.D., D.C.L.
+
+
+ WITH REPLIES FROM CLERGY AND LAITY, AND
+ AN EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN
+
+
+ EDITED, WITH ESSAYS AND COMMENTS, BY THE
+ REV. F. A. MALLESON, M.A.
+ VICAR OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS
+
+
+ THIRD EDITION
+
+
+ _WITH ADDITIONAL LETTERS BY MR. RUSKIN_
+
+
+ LONDON
+
+ GEORGE ALLEN, 156, CHARING CROSS ROAD
+
+ 1896
+
+ [_All rights reserved_]
+
+
+
+
+ _Printed by_ BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO
+
+ _At the Ballantyne Press_
+
+
+
+
+ INTRODUCTION
+
+
+The first reading of the Letters to the Clerical Society to which they
+were first addressed in September 1879, twenty-three clergy being
+present, was prefaced with the following remarks:--
+
+ A few words by way of introduction will be absolutely necessary
+ before I proceed to read Mr. Ruskin's letters. They originated
+ simply in a proposal of mine, which met with so ready and willing a
+ response, that it almost seemed like a simultaneous thought. They
+ are addressed nominally to myself, as representing the body of
+ clergy whose secretary I have the honour to be; they are, in fact,
+ therefore addressed to this Society primarily. But in the course of
+ the next month or two they will also be read to two other Clerical
+ Societies,--the Ormskirk and the Brighton (junior),--who have
+ acceded to my proposals with much kindness, and in the first case
+ have invited me of their own accord. I have undertaken, to the best
+ of my ability, to arrange and set down the various expressions of
+ opinion, which will be freely uttered. In so limited a time, many
+ who may have much to say that would be really valuable will find no
+ time to-day to deliver it. Of these brethren, I beg that they will
+ do me the favour to express their views at their leisure, in
+ writing. The original letters, the discussions, the letters which
+ may be suggested, and a few comments of the Editor's, will be
+ published in a volume which will appear, I trust, in the beginning
+ of the next year.
+
+ I will now, if you please, undertake the somewhat dangerous
+ responsibility of avowing my own impressions of the letters I am
+ about to read to you. I own that I believe I see in these papers
+ the development of a principle of the deepest interest and
+ importance,--namely, the application of the highest standard in the
+ interpretation of the Gospel message _to_ ourselves as clergymen,
+ and _from_ ourselves to our congregations. We have plenty elsewhere
+ of doctrine and dogma, and undefinable shades of theological
+ opinion. Let us turn at last to practical questions presented for
+ our consideration by an eminent layman whose field of work lies
+ quite as much in religion and ethics, as it does, reaching to so
+ splendid an eminence, in Art. A man is wanted to show to both
+ clergy and laity something of the full force and meaning of Gospel
+ teaching. Many there are, and I am of this number, whose cry is
+ "_Exoriare aliquis_."
+
+ I ask you, if possible, to do in an hour what I have been for the
+ last two months trying to do, to divest myself of old forms of
+ thought, to cast off self-indulgent views of our duty as ministers
+ of religion, to lift ourselves out of those grooves in which we are
+ apt to run so smoothly and so complacently, persuading ourselves
+ that all is well just as it is, and to endeavour to strike into a
+ sterner, harder path, beset with difficulties, but still the path
+ of duty. These papers will demand a close, a patient, and in some
+ places, a few will think, an indulgent consideration; but as a
+ whole, the standard taken is, as I firmly believe, speaking only
+ for myself, lofty and Christian to the extent of an almost ideal
+ perfection. If we do go forward straight in the direction which Mr.
+ Ruskin points out, I know we shall come, sooner or later, to a
+ chasm right across our path. Some of us, I hope, will undauntedly
+ cross it. Let each judge for himself, [Greek: to telei pistin
+ pheron].
+
+
+
+
+ PREFACE
+
+ TO THE THIRD EDITION
+
+
+Having been urged to bring out a new edition of the volume first edited
+by me in 1880, and having willingly accepted the invitation to do so, it
+will naturally be expected that I should give some account of the
+circumstances which have led me to take the somewhat unusual step of
+reviving a book which has for twelve years been lying in a state of
+suspended animation.
+
+On the first conception of this volume I applied to Messrs. Strahan, to
+produce it before the reading and thinking world. I should have done
+more wisely, no doubt, had I offered the publication to Mr. George
+Allen, Mr. Ruskin's well-known publisher. It avails not to explain why I
+chose a different course, of which subsequent events only too soon
+showed me the error; for after the first edition had been sold off in a
+week, and while the second was partly sold and partly in preparation,
+Messrs. Strahan's failure was announced, greatly to my surprise; my
+somewhat isolated position in the north country so far from London
+keeping me very imperfectly informed as to what was passing in the
+literary world.
+
+Reasonable, business-like people would ask, why did I not make an effort
+to rescue my little barque out of the general wreckage, and why did I
+not, remembering that Mr. Ruskin had with much kindness freely bestowed
+the copyright on me, save the second edition and arrange with another
+publisher to carry the work on? But I was failing at the time with the
+illness which was effectually cured only by a long sojourn amidst or
+very near to the ice and snow of the Alps. I was incapable of much
+exertion, and, in fact, did not much care. Besides which I am not a
+professed literary man, being chiefly interested in the work of my rural
+parish on the borders of the Lake District, and should not think it
+fair, or even possible, if I may use an equestrian metaphor, to attempt
+to ride two horses at once.
+
+So Mr. Ruskin's letters, etc., as edited by the present writer, came to
+be entirely laid by, though not forgotten by the hosts of Mr. Ruskin's
+friends, followers, and admirers, who regretted the suspension of so
+valuable a work and so rich in great thoughts, teachings, and
+suggestions.
+
+So things remained until August 1895, when a new friend, Mr. Smart, gave
+me the pleasure of a visit, and we talked over the circumstances just
+narrated. Passing over several very pleasant meetings in London, let it
+be sufficient to mention that under the impulse of Mr. George Allen's
+encouragement, and cheered by the valuable assistance and co-operation
+of another friend, Mr. T. J. Wise, I agreed to carry forward this Third
+Edition with the full approbation and consent of Mr. Ruskin himself,
+though it should be said that on account of the state of his health, I
+have been unable to consult him on any of the details of the
+publication.
+
+But it will not be exactly the same volume. Mr. Allen and Mr. Wise,
+having gone over much of my correspondence with Mr. Ruskin, were good
+enough to express a desire that some of those letters addressed to
+myself as a friend should be embodied in the present volume, as being
+strongly illustrative of his views on the subjects dealt with in his
+more formal Letters to the Clergy. I may claim pardon for a feeling of
+great satisfaction with the circumstance that in the course of so long
+and so delicate a correspondence as is contained in this volume, never
+has a cloud overshadowed our paths in this matter, never has a cold
+blast from the east sent a shiver through my system, nor, I presume,
+his. For had Mr. Ruskin felt any resentment at anything I wrote, with
+his usual downright frankness he would not have been backward for an
+hour in expressing in vehement language what he felt. But from first to
+last my intercourse with that kind and eminently distinguished friend
+has been kept bright and happy by his unvarying serenity.
+
+The Letters from Clergy and Laity in this Third Edition occupy much less
+space than in the original one. It was Mr. Ruskin's wish that they
+should be subjected to some process of abridgment; besides which the
+allowing of space for the new feature of additional Ruskin Letters made
+a curtailment in another direction necessary. The plan which seemed to
+me the least discourteous to my numerous correspondents of that time has
+been to make a selection of passages from a certain number of the
+Letters.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+ THE VICARAGE,
+
+ BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS,
+
+ _January 1896._
+
+
+
+
+ CONTENTS
+
+
+ PAGE
+
+ INTRODUCTION v
+
+ PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION xi
+
+ MR. RUSKIN'S LETTERS--
+
+ LETTER I. 3
+
+ " II. 5
+
+ " III. 8
+
+ " IV. 9
+
+ " V. 12
+
+ " VI. 15
+
+ " VII. 19
+
+ " VIII. 25
+
+ " IX. 32
+
+ " X. 36
+
+ " XI. 42
+
+ ESSAYS AND COMMENTS. BY THE EDITOR 49
+
+ EXTRACTS OF LETTERS FROM CLERGY AND LAITY 131
+
+ LETTERS FROM BRANTWOOD-ON-THE-LAKE TO THE
+ VICARAGE OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS 219
+
+ EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN 287
+
+ APPENDIX 323
+
+
+
+
+ MR. RUSKIN'S LETTERS
+
+
+
+
+ I
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON, LANCASHIRE,
+ _20th June, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I could not at once answer your important letter:
+for, though I felt at once the impossibility of my venturing to address
+such an audience as you proposed, I am unwilling to fail in answering to
+any call relating to matters respecting which my feelings have been long
+in earnest, if in any wise it may be possible for me to be of service
+therein. My health--or want of it--now utterly forbids my engagement in
+any duty involving excitement or acute intellectual effort; but I
+think, before the first Tuesday in August, I might be able to write one
+or two letters to yourself, referring to, and more or less completing,
+some passages already printed in Fors and elsewhere, which might, on
+your reading any portions you thought available, become matter of
+discussion during the meeting at some leisure time, after its own main
+purposes had been answered.
+
+At all events, I will think over what I should like, and be able, to
+represent to such a meeting, and only beg you not to think me insensible
+of the honour done me by your wish, and of the gravity of the trust
+reposed in me.
+
+ Ever most faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ THE REV. F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ II
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON,
+ _23rd June, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--Walking, and talking, are now alike impossible to
+me;[1] my strength is gone for both; nor do I believe talking on such
+matters to be of the least use except to promote, between sensible
+people, kindly feeling and knowledge of each other's personal
+characters. I have every trust in _your_ kindness and truth; nor do I
+fear being myself misunderstood by you; what I may be able to put into
+written form, so as to admit of being laid before your friends in
+council, must be set down without any question of personal feeling--as
+simply as a mathematical question or demonstration.
+
+ [1] In answer to the proposal of discussing the subject during a
+ mountain walk.
+
+The first exact question which it seems to me such an assembly may be
+earnestly called upon by laymen to solve, is surely axiomatic: the
+definition of themselves as a body, and of their business as such.
+
+Namely: as clergymen of the Church of England, do they consider
+themselves to be so called merely as the attached servants of a
+particular state? Do they, in their quality of guides, hold a position
+similar to that of the guides of Chamouni or Grindelwald, who being a
+numbered body of examined and trustworthy persons belonging to those
+several villages, have nevertheless no Chamounist or Grindelwaldist
+opinions on the subject of Alpine geography or glacier walking: but are
+prepared to put into practice a common and universal science of Locality
+and Athletics, founded on sure survey and successful practice? Are the
+clergymen of the Ecclesia of England thus simply the attached and
+salaried guides of England and the English, in the way, known of all
+good men, that leadeth unto life?--or are they, on the contrary, a body
+of men holding, or in any legal manner required, or compelled to hold,
+opinions on the subject--say, of the height of the Celestial Mountains,
+the crevasses which go down quickest to the pit, and other cognate
+points of science,--differing from, or even contrary to, the tenets of
+the guides of the Church of France, the Church of Italy, and other
+Christian countries?
+
+Is not this the first of all questions which a Clerical Council has to
+answer in open terms?
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ III
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _6th July, 1879_.
+
+My first letter contained a Layman's plea for a clear answer to the
+question, "What is a clergyman of the Church of England?" Supposing the
+answer to this first to be, that the clergy of the Church of England are
+teachers, not of the Gospel to England, but of the Gospel to all
+nations; and not of the Gospel of Luther, nor of the Gospel of
+Augustine, but of the Gospel of Christ,--then the Layman's second
+question would be:
+
+Can this Gospel of Christ be put into such plain words and short terms
+as that a plain man may understand it?--and, if so, would it not be, in
+a quite primal sense, desirable that it should be so, rather than left
+to be gathered out of Thirty-nine Articles, written by no means in
+clear English, and referring, for further explanation of exactly the
+most important point in the whole tenor of their teaching,[2] to a
+"Homily of Justification,"[3] which is not generally in the possession,
+or even probably within the comprehension, of simple persons?
+
+ Ever faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ [2] Art. xi.
+
+ [3] Homily xi. of the Second Table.
+
+
+
+
+ IV
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _8th July, 1879_.
+
+I am so very glad that you approve of the letter plan, as it enables me
+to build up what I would fain try to say, of little stones, without
+lifting too much for my strength at once; and the sense of addressing a
+friend who understands me and sympathizes with me prevents my being
+brought to a stand by continual need for apology, or fear of giving
+offence.
+
+But yet I do not quite see why you should feel my asking for a simple
+and comprehensible statement of the Christian Gospel as startling. Are
+you not bid to go into _all_ the world and preach it to every creature?
+(I should myself think the clergyman most likely to do good who accepted
+the [Greek: pase te ktisei] so literally as at least to sympathize with
+St. Francis' sermon to the birds, and to feel that feeding either sheep
+or fowls, or unmuzzling the ox, or keeping the wrens alive in the snow,
+would be received by their Heavenly Feeder as the _perfect_ fulfilment
+of His "Feed My sheep" in the higher sense.)
+
+That's all a parenthesis; for although I should think that your good
+company would all agree that kindness to animals was a kind of preaching
+to them, and that hunting and vivisection were a kind of blasphemy to
+them, I want only to put the sterner question before your council, _how_
+this Gospel is to be preached either "[Greek: pantachou]" or to "[Greek:
+panta ta ethne]," if first its preachers have not determined quite
+clearly what it _is_? And might not such definition, acceptable to the
+entire body of the Church of Christ, be arrived at by merely explaining,
+in their completeness and life, the terms of the Lord's Prayer--the
+first words taught to children all over the Christian world?
+
+I will try to explain what I mean of its several articles, in following
+letters; and in answer to the question with which you close your last, I
+can only say that you are at perfect liberty to use any, or all, or any
+parts of them, as you think good. Usually, when I am asked if letters of
+mine may be printed, I say: "Assuredly, provided only that you print
+them entire." But in your hands, I withdraw even this condition, and
+trust gladly to your judgment, remaining always
+
+ Faithfully and affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ THE REV. F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ V
+
+ [Greek: pater hemon ho en tois ouranois.]
+
+ _Pater noster qui es in caelis._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _10th July, 1879_.
+
+My meaning, in saying that the Lord's Prayer might be made a foundation
+of Gospel-teaching, was not that it contained all that Christian
+ministers have to teach; but that it contains what all Christians are
+agreed upon as first to be taught; and that no good parish-working
+pastor in any district of the world but would be glad to take his part
+in making it clear and living to his congregation.
+
+And the first clause of it, of course rightly explained, gives us the
+ground of what is surely a mighty part of the Gospel--its "first and
+great commandment," namely, that we have a Father whom we _can_ love,
+and are required to love, and to desire to be with Him in Heaven,
+wherever that may be.
+
+And to declare that we have such a loving Father, whose mercy is over
+_all_ His works, and whose will and law is so lovely and lovable that it
+is sweeter than honey, and more precious than gold, to those who can
+"taste" and "see" that the Lord is Good--this, surely, is a most
+pleasant and glorious good message and _spell_ to bring to men--as
+distinguished from the evil message and accursed spell that Satan has
+brought to the nations of the world instead of it, that they have no
+Father, but only "a consuming fire" ready to devour them, unless they
+are delivered from its raging flame by some scheme of pardon for all,
+for which they are to be thankful, not to the Father, but to the Son.
+
+Supposing this first article of the true Gospel agreed to, how would the
+blessing that closes the epistles of that Gospel become intelligible and
+living, instead of dark and dead: "The grace of Christ, and the _love_
+of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost,"--the most _tender_ word
+being that used of the Father!
+
+
+
+
+ VI
+
+ [Greek: hagiastheto to onoma sou.]
+
+ _Sanctificetur nomen tuum._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _12th July, 1879_.
+
+I wonder how many, even of those who honestly and attentively join in
+our Church services, attach any distinct idea to the second clause of
+the Lord's Prayer--the _first petition_ of it--the first thing that they
+are ordered by Christ to seek of their Father?
+
+Am I unjust in thinking that most of them have little more notion on the
+matter than that God has forbidden "bad language," and wishes them to
+pray that everybody may be respectful to Him?
+
+Is it any otherwise with the Third Commandment? Do not most look on it
+merely in the light of the statute on swearing? and read the words
+"will not hold him guiltless" merely as a passionless intimation that
+however carelessly a man may let out a round oath, there really _is_
+something wrong in it?
+
+On the other hand, can anything be more tremendous than the words
+themselves--double-negatived:
+
+ "[Greek: ou gar me katharise ... kurios]"?
+
+For _other_ sins there is washing;--for this--none! the seventh verse
+(Exod. xx.), in the Septuagint, marking the real power rather than the
+English, which (I suppose) is literal to the Hebrew.
+
+To my layman's mind, of practical needs in the present state of the
+Church, nothing is so immediate as that of explaining to the
+congregation the meaning of being gathered in His name, and having Him
+in the midst of them; as, on the other hand, of being gathered in
+blasphemy of His name, and having the devil in the midst of
+them--presiding over the prayers which have become an abomination.
+
+For the entire body of the texts in the Gospel against hypocrisy are one
+and all nothing but the expansion of the threatening that closes the
+Third Commandment. For as "the name whereby He shall be called is THE
+LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS,"--so the taking that name in vain is the sum of
+"the deceivableness of _un_righteousness in them that perish."
+
+Without dwelling on the possibility--which I do not myself, however, for
+a moment doubt--of an honest clergyman's being able actually to prevent
+the entrance among his congregation of persons leading openly wicked
+lives, could any subject be more vital to the purposes of your meetings
+than the difference between the present and the probable state of the
+Christian Church which would result, were it more the effort of zealous
+parish priests, instead of getting wicked _poor_ people to _come_ to
+church, to get wicked rich ones to stay out of it?
+
+Lest, in any discussion of such question, it might be, as it too often
+is, alleged that "the Lord looketh upon the heart," etc, let me be
+permitted to say--with as much positiveness as may express my deepest
+conviction--that, while indeed it is the Lord's business to look upon
+the heart, it is the pastor's to look upon the hands and the lips; and
+that the foulest oaths of the thief and the street-walker are, in the
+ears of God, sinless as the hawk's cry, or the gnat's murmur, compared
+to the responses, in the Church service, on the lips of the usurer and
+the adulterer, who have destroyed, not their own souls only, but those
+of the outcast ones whom they have made their victims.
+
+It is for the meeting of Clergymen themselves--not for a layman
+addressing them--to ask further, how much the name of God may be taken
+in vain, and profaned instead of hallowed--_in_ the pulpit, as well as
+under it.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ VII
+
+ [Greek: eltheto he basileia sou.]
+
+ _Adveniat regnum tuum._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _14th July, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--Sincere thanks for both your letters and the proofs
+sent. Your comment and conducting link, when needed, will be of the
+greatest help and value, I am well assured, suggesting what you know
+will be the probable feeling of your hearers, and the point that will
+come into question.
+
+Yes, certainly, that "His" in the fourth line[4] was meant to imply that
+eternal presence of Christ; as in another passage,[5] referring to the
+Creation, "when His right hand strewed the snow on Lebanon, and
+smoothed the slopes of Calvary;" but in so far as we dwell on that
+truth, "Hast thou seen _Me_, Philip, and not the Father?"[6] we are not
+teaching the people what is specially the Gospel of _Christ_ as having a
+distinct function, namely, to _serve_ the Father, and do the Father's
+will. And in all His human relations to us, and commands to us, it is as
+the Son of Man, not as the "power of God and wisdom of God," that He
+acts and speaks. Not as the Power; for _He_ must pray, like one of us.
+Not as the Wisdom; for He must not know "if it be possible" His prayer
+should be heard.
+
+ [4] In a proof sheet of a book of the Editor's at that time in the
+ press.
+
+ [5] Referring to the closing sentence of the third paragraph of the
+ fifth letter, which _seemed_ to express what I felt could not be
+ Mr. Ruskin's full meaning, I pointed out to him the following
+ sentence in "Modern Painters:"--
+
+ "When, in the desert, Jesus was girding Himself for the work of
+ life, angels of life came and ministered unto Him; now, in the
+ fair world, when He is girding Himself for the work of death,
+ the ministrants came to Him from the grave; but from the grave
+ conquered. One from the tomb under Abarim, which _His_ own hand
+ had sealed long ago; the other from the rest which He had
+ entered without seeing corruption."
+
+ On this I made a remark somewhat to the following effect: that I
+ felt sure Mr. Ruskin regarded the loving work of the Father and of
+ the Son as _equal_ in the forgiveness of sins and redemption of
+ mankind; that what is done by the Father is in reality done also by
+ the Son; and that it is by a mere accommodation to human infirmity
+ of understanding that the doctrine of the Trinity is revealed to us
+ in language, inadequate indeed to convey divine truths, but still
+ the only language possible; and I asked whether some such feeling
+ was not present in his mind when he used the pronoun "His" in the
+ above passage from "Modern Painters" of the Son, where it would be
+ usually understood of the Father; and as a corollary, whether, in
+ the letter, he does not himself fully recognise the fact of the
+ redemption of the world by the loving self-sacrifice of the Son
+ being in entire concurrence with the equally loving will of the
+ Father. This, as well as I can recollect, is the origin of the
+ passage in the second paragraph in this seventh letter.--EDITOR OF
+ LETTERS.
+
+ [6] "Yet hast thou not known Me, Philip? he that hath seen Me hath
+ seen the Father" (John xiv. 9).--EDITOR.
+
+And in what I want to say of the third clause of His prayer (_His_, not
+merely as His ordering, but His using), it is especially this comparison
+between _His_ kingdom, and His Father's, that I want to see the
+disciples guarded against. I believe very few, even of the most earnest,
+using that petition, realize that it is the Father's--not the
+Son's--kingdom, that they pray may come,--although the whole prayer is
+foundational on that fact: "_For_ Thine is the kingdom, the power, and
+the glory." And I fancy that the mind of the most faithful Christian is
+quite led away from its proper hope, by dwelling on the reign--or the
+coming again--of Christ; which, indeed, they are to look for, and
+_watch_ for, but not to pray for. Their prayer is to be for the greater
+kingdom to which He, risen and having all His enemies under His feet, is
+to surrender _His_, "that God may be All in All."
+
+And, though the greatest, it is that everlasting kingdom which the
+poorest of us can advance. We cannot hasten Christ's coming. "Of the day
+and the hour, knoweth no man." But the kingdom of God is as a grain of
+mustard-seed:--we can sow of it; it is as a foam-globe of leaven:--we
+can mingle it; and its glory and its joy are that even the birds of the
+air can lodge in the branches thereof.
+
+Forgive me for getting back to my sparrows; but truly in the present
+state of England, the fowls of the air are the only creatures, tormented
+and murdered as they are, that yet have here and there nests, and peace,
+and joy in the Holy Ghost. And it would be well if many of us, in
+reading that text, "The kingdom of God is NOT meat and drink," had even
+got so far as to the understanding that it is at least _as much_, and
+that until we had fed the hungry, there was no power in us to inspire
+the unhappy.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+I will write my feeling about the pieces of the Life of Christ[7] you
+have sent me in a private letter. I may say at once that I am sure it
+will do much good, and will be upright and intelligible, which how few
+religious writings are?
+
+ [7] The Life and Work of Jesus Christ. Ward and Lock.
+
+
+
+
+ VIII
+
+ [Greek: genetheto to thelema sou, hos en ourano, kai epi ges.]
+
+ _Fiat voluntas tua sicut in coelo et in terra._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _9th August, 1879_.
+
+I was reading the second chapter of Malachi this morning by chance, and
+wondering how many clergymen ever read it, and took to heart the
+"commandment for _them_."
+
+For they are always ready enough to call themselves priests (though they
+know themselves to be nothing of the sort), whenever there is any
+dignity to be got out of the title; but, whenever there is any good,
+hot scolding or unpleasant advice given them by the prophets, in that
+self-assumed character of theirs, they are as ready to quit it as ever
+Dionysus his lion-skin, when he finds the character of Herakles
+inconvenient.
+
+"Ye have wearied the Lord with your words;" (yes, and some of His people
+too, in your time), "yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied Him? When ye
+say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and He
+delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?"
+
+How many, again and again I wonder, of the lively young ecclesiastics
+supplied to the increasing demand of our west ends of flourishing Cities
+of the Plain, ever consider what sort of sin it is for which God (unless
+they lay it to heart) will "curse their blessings, and spread dung upon
+their faces;" or have understood, even in the dimmest manner, what part
+_they_ had taken, and were taking, in "corrupting the covenant of the
+Lord with Levi, and causing many to stumble at the Law."
+
+Perhaps the most subtle and unconscious way in which the religious
+teachers upon whom the ends of the world are come, have done this, is in
+never telling their people the meaning of the clause in the Lord's
+Prayer, which, of all others, their most earnest hearers have oftenest
+on their lips: "Thy will be done." They allow their people to use it as
+if their Father's will were always to kill their babies, or do something
+unpleasant to them; and following comfort and wealth, instead of
+explaining to them that the first and intensest article of their
+Father's will was their own sanctification; and that the one only path
+to national prosperity and to domestic peace, was to understand what the
+will of the Lord was, and to do all they could to get it done. Whereas
+one would think, by the tone of the eagerest preachers nowadays, that
+they held their blessed office to be that, not of showing men how to do
+their Father's will on earth, but how to get to heaven without doing any
+of it either here or there!
+
+I say, especially, the most eager preachers; for nearly the whole
+Missionary body (with the hottest Evangelistic sect of the English
+Church) is at this moment composed of men who think the Gospel they are
+to carry to mend the world with, forsooth, is that, "If any man sin, he
+hath an Advocate with the Father;" while I have never yet, in my own
+experience, met either with a Missionary or a Town Bishop who so much
+as professed himself "to understand what the will of the Lord" was, far
+less to teach anybody else to do it; and for fifty preachers, yes, and
+fifty hundreds whom I have heard proclaiming the Mediator of the New
+Testament, that "they which were called might receive the promise of
+eternal inheritance," I have never yet heard so much as _one_ heartily
+proclaiming against all those "deceivers with vain words" (Eph. v. 6),
+that "no covetous person which is an idolater, hath _any_ inheritance in
+the kingdom of Christ, or of God;" and on myself personally and publicly
+challenging the Bishops of England generally, and by name the Bishop of
+Manchester, to say whether usury was, or was not, according to the will
+of God, I have received no answer from any one of them.[8]
+
+ [8] Fors Clavigera, Letter lxxxii., p. 323.
+
+
+
+ _13th August._
+
+I have allowed myself, in the beginning of this letter, to dwell on the
+equivocal use of the word "Priest" in the English Church (see
+"Christopher Harvey," Grosart's edition, p. 38), because the assumption
+of the mediatorial, in defect of the pastoral, office by the clergy
+fulfils itself, naturally and always, in their pretending to absolve the
+sinner from his punishment, instead of purging him from his sin; and
+practically, in their general patronage and encouragement of all the
+iniquity of the world, by steadily preaching away the penalties of it.
+So that the great cities of the earth, which ought to be the places set
+on its hills, with the Temple of the Lord in the midst of them, to which
+the tribes should go up,--centres to the Kingdoms and Provinces of
+Honour, Virtue, and the Knowledge of the law of God,--have become,
+instead, loathsome centres of fornication and covetousness--the smoke of
+their sin going up into the face of heaven like the furnace of Sodom,
+and the pollution of it rotting and raging through the bones and the
+souls of the peasant people round them, as if they were each a volcano
+whose ashes broke out in blains upon man and upon beast.
+
+And in the midst of them, their freshly-set-up steeples ring the crowd
+to a weekly prayer that the rest of their lives may be pure and holy,
+while they have not the slightest intention of purifying, sanctifying,
+or changing their lives in any the smallest particular; and their clergy
+gather, each into himself, the curious dual power, and Janus-faced
+majesty in mischief, of the prophet that prophesies falsely, and the
+priest that bears rule by his means.
+
+And the people love to have it so.
+
+
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _12th August_.
+
+I am very glad of your little note from Brighton. I thought it needless
+to send the two letters there, which you will find at home; and they
+pretty nearly end all _I_ want to say; for the remaining clauses of the
+prayer touch on things too high for me. But I will send you one
+concluding letter about them.
+
+
+
+
+ IX
+
+ [Greek: ton arton hemon ton epiousion dos hemin semeron.]
+
+ _Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _19th August_.
+
+I retained the foregoing letter by me till now, lest you should think it
+written in any haste or petulance: but it is every word of it
+deliberate, though expressing the bitterness of twenty years of vain
+sorrow and pleading concerning these things. Nor am I able to write,
+otherwise, anything of the next following clause of the prayer;--for no
+words could be burning enough to tell the evils which have come on the
+world from men's using it thoughtlessly and blasphemously, praying God
+to give them what they are deliberately resolved to steal. For all true
+Christianity is known--as its Master was--in breaking of bread, and all
+false Christianity in stealing it.
+
+Let the clergyman only apply--with impartial and level sweep--to his
+congregation the great pastoral order: "The man that will not work,
+neither should he eat;" and be resolute in requiring each member of his
+flock to tell him _what_--day by day--they do to earn their
+dinners;--and he will find an entirely new view of life and its
+sacraments open upon him and them.
+
+For the man who is not--day by day--doing work which will earn his
+dinner, must be stealing his dinner; and the actual fact is, that the
+great mass of men calling themselves Christians do actually live by
+robbing the poor of their bread, and by no other trade whatsoever; and
+the simple examination of the mode of the produce and consumption of
+European food--who digs for it, and who eats it--will prove that to any
+honest human soul.
+
+Nor is it possible for any Christian Church to exist but in pollutions
+and hypocrisies beyond all words, until the virtues of a life moderate
+in its self-indulgence, and wide in its offices of temporal ministry to
+the poor, are insisted on as the normal conditions in which, only, the
+prayer to God for the harvest of the earth is other than blasphemy.
+
+In the second place. Since in the parable in Luke, the bread asked for
+is shown to be also, and chiefly, the Holy Spirit (Luke xi. 13), and the
+prayer, "Give us each day our daily bread" is, in its fulness, the
+disciples' "Lord, evermore give us _this_ bread,"--the clergyman's
+question to his whole flock, primarily literal, "Children, have ye here
+any meat?" must ultimately be always the greater spiritual one:
+"Children, have ye here any Holy Spirit?" or, "Have ye not heard yet
+whether there _be_ any? and, instead of a Holy Ghost the Lord and Giver
+of Life, do you only believe in an unholy mammon, Lord and Giver of
+Death?"
+
+The opposition between the two Lords has been, and will be as long as
+the world lasts, absolute, irreconcilable, mortal; and the clergyman's
+first message to his people of this day is--if he be faithful--"Choose
+ye this day, whom ye will serve."
+
+ Ever faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ X
+
+ [Greek: kai aphes hemin ta opheilemata hemon, hos kai
+ hemeis aphiemen tois opheiletais hemon.]
+
+ _Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus
+ debitoribus nostris._
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _3rd September_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I have been very long before trying to say so much
+as a word about the sixth clause of the Pater; for whenever I began
+thinking of it, I was stopped by the sorrowful sense of the hopeless
+task you poor clergymen had, nowadays, in recommending and teaching
+people to love their enemies, when their whole energies were already
+devoted to swindling their friends.
+
+But, in any days, past or now, the clause is one of such difficulty,
+that, to understand it, means almost to know the love of God which
+passeth knowledge.
+
+But, at all events, it is surely the pastor's duty to prevent his flock
+from _mis_-understanding it; and above all things to keep them from
+supposing that God's forgiveness is to be had simply for the asking, by
+those who "wilfully sin after they have received the knowledge of the
+truth."
+
+There is one very simple lesson, also, needed especially by people in
+circumstances of happy life, which I have never heard fully enforced
+from the pulpit, and which is usually the more lost sight of, because
+the fine and inaccurate word "trespasses" is so often used instead of
+the simple and accurate one, "debts." Among people well educated and
+happily circumstanced, it may easily chance that long periods of their
+lives pass without any such conscious sin as could, on any discovery or
+memory of it, make them cry out, in truth and in pain, "I have sinned
+against the Lord." But scarcely an hour of their happy days can pass
+over them without leaving--were their hearts open--some evidence written
+there that they have "left undone the things that they ought to have
+done," and giving them bitterer and heavier cause to cry and cry
+again--for ever, in the pure words of their Master's prayer, "Dimitte
+nobis _debita_ nostra."
+
+In connection with the more accurate translation of "debts," rather than
+"trespasses," it would surely be well to keep constantly in the mind of
+complacent and inoffensive congregations, that in Christ's own prophecy
+of the manner of the last judgment, the condemnation is pronounced only
+on the sins of omission: "I was hungry, and ye gave Me no meat."
+
+But, whatever the manner of sin, by offence or defect, which the
+preacher fears in his people, surely he has of late been wholly remiss
+in compelling their definite recognition of it, in its several and
+personal particulars. Nothing in the various inconsistency of human
+nature is more grotesque than its willingness to be taxed with any
+quantity of sins in the gross, and its resentment at the insinuation of
+having committed the smallest parcel of them in detail. And the English
+Liturgy, evidently drawn up with the amiable intention of making
+religion as pleasant as possible to a people desirous of saving their
+souls with no great degree of personal inconvenience, is perhaps in no
+point more unwholesomely lenient than in its concession to the popular
+conviction that we may obtain the present advantage, and escape the
+future punishment, of any sort of iniquity, by dexterously concealing
+the manner of it from man, and triumphantly confessing the quantity of
+it to God.
+
+Finally, whatever the advantages and decencies of a form of prayer, and
+how wide soever the scope given to its collected passages, it cannot be
+at one and the same time fitted for the use of a body of well-taught and
+experienced Christians, such as should join the services of a Church
+nineteen centuries old,--and adapted to the needs of the timid sinner
+who has that day first entered its porch, or of the remorseful publican
+who has only recently become sensible of his call to a pew.
+
+And surely our clergy need not be surprised at the daily increasing
+distrust in the public mind of the efficacy of Prayer, after having so
+long insisted on their offering supplication, _at least_ every Sunday
+morning at eleven o'clock, that the rest of their lives hereafter might
+be pure and holy, leaving them conscious all the while that they would
+be similarly required to inform the Lord next week, at the same hour,
+that "there was no health in them"!
+
+Among the much rebuked follies and abuses of so-called "Ritualism," none
+that I have heard of are indeed so dangerously and darkly "Ritual" as
+this piece of authorized mockery of the most solemn act of human life,
+and only entrance of eternal life--Repentance.
+
+ Believe me, dear Mr. Malleson,
+ Ever faithfully and respectfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ XI
+
+ [Greek: kai me eisenegkes hemas eis peirasmon, alla rhusai hemas apo
+ tou ponerou; hoti sou estin he basileia kai he dunamis kai he doxa
+ eis tous aionas; amen.]
+
+ _Et ne nos inducas in tentationem; sed libera nos a malo; Quia tuum
+ est regmum, potentia, et gloria in saecula saeculorum. Amen._
+
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _14th September, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--The gentle words in your last letter referring to
+the difference between yourself and me in the degree of hope with which
+you could regard what could not but appear to the general mind Utopian
+in designs for the action of the Christian Church, surely might best be
+answered by appeal to the consistent tone of the prayer we have been
+examining.
+
+Is not every one of its petitions for a perfect state? and is not this
+last clause of it, of which we are to think to-day--if fully
+understood--a petition not only for the restoration of Paradise, but of
+Paradise in which there shall be no deadly fruit, or, at least, no
+tempter to praise it? And may we not admit that it is probably only for
+want of the earnest use of this last petition, that not only the
+preceding ones have become formal with us, but that the private and
+simply restricted prayer for the little things we each severally desire,
+has become by some Christians dreaded and unused, and by others used
+faithlessly, and therefore with disappointment?
+
+And is it not for want of this special directness and simplicity of
+petition, and of the sense of its acceptance, that the whole nature of
+prayer has been doubted in our hearts, and disgraced by our lips; that
+we are afraid to ask God's blessing on the earth, when the scientific
+people tell us He has made previous arrangements to curse it; and that,
+instead of obeying, without fear or debate, the plain order, "Ask, and
+ye shall receive, that your joy may be full," we sorrowfully sink back
+into the apology for prayer, that "it is a wholesome exercise, even when
+fruitless," and that we ought piously always to suppose that the text
+really means no more than "Ask, and ye shall _not_ receive, that your
+joy may be _empty_"?
+
+Supposing we were first all of us quite sure that we _had_ prayed,
+honestly, the prayer against temptation, and that we would thankfully be
+refused anything we had set our hearts upon, if indeed God saw that it
+would lead us into evil, might we not have confidence afterwards that He
+in whose hand the King's heart is, as the rivers of water, would turn
+our tiny little hearts also in the way that they should go, and that
+_then_ the special prayer for the joys He taught them to seek, would be
+answered to the last syllable, and to overflowing?
+
+It is surely scarcely necessary to say, farther, what the holy teachers
+of all nations have invariably concurred in showing,--that faithful
+prayer implies always correlative exertion; and that no man can ask
+honestly or hopefully to be delivered from temptation, unless he has
+himself honestly and firmly determined to do the best he can to keep out
+of it. But, in modern days, the first aim of all Christian parents is to
+place their children in circumstances where the temptations (which they
+are apt to call "opportunities") may be as great and as many as
+possible; where the sight and promise of "all these things" in Satan's
+gift may be brilliantly near; and where the act of "falling down to
+worship me" may be partly concealed by the shelter, and partly excused,
+as involuntary, by the pressure, of the concurrent crowd.
+
+In what respect the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of _them_,
+differ from the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory, which are God's for
+ever, is seldom, as far as I have heard, intelligibly explained from the
+pulpit; and still less the irreconcilable hostility between the two
+royalties and realms asserted in its sternness of decision.
+
+Whether it be indeed Utopian to believe that the kingdom we are taught
+to pray for _may_ come--verily come--for the asking, it is surely not
+for man to judge; but it is at least at his choice to resolve that he
+will no longer render obedience, nor ascribe glory and power, to the
+Devil. If he cannot find strength in himself to advance towards Heaven,
+he may at least say to the power of Hell, "Get thee behind me;" and
+staying himself on the testimony of Him who saith, "Surely I come
+quickly," ratify his happy prayer with the faithful "Amen, even so,
+come, Lord Jesus."
+
+ Ever, my dear friend,
+ Believe me affectionately
+ and gratefully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ ESSAYS AND COMMENTS
+
+ ON THE
+
+ FOREGOING LETTERS
+
+ BY THE EDITOR
+
+
+
+
+ ESSAYS AND COMMENTS
+
+
+Feeling deeply, and anxiously, the greatness of the responsibility laid
+upon me to act, as it were, the part of an envoy between so eminent a
+teacher as Mr. Ruskin and my brethren in the Ministry, I have thought
+that it might not be taken amiss if I prefaced my account of the origin
+of the series of letters placed in my hands for publication (see Letter
+8th July, 1879)[9] with just a mere allusion to one written to me four
+years ago.
+
+ [9] No. IV.
+
+One or two imperfect conversations, leading up to the subject of the
+Resurrection, which had been broken off by accidental circumstances,
+together with the letter alluded to, had stimulated in me a feeling of
+something more than curiosity--rather one of anxious interest--to learn
+more of Mr. Ruskin's views upon matters which are at the present day
+giving rise to a good deal of agitated discussion among intellectual
+men.
+
+I am thankful to be able to avow that, for my own part, I am a firm and
+conscientious, not a thoughtless and passive, believer in the doctrines
+of the Church of Christ as held by the majority of serious-minded
+religious men in the Established Church. Mr. Ruskin was mistaken in his
+much too ready assumption that I (simply because I am a clergyman) am a
+believer on compulsion; that for the peace of my soul I have only to
+thank religious anaesthetics, and that I ever preach against the
+wickedness of involuntary doubt. God forbid that I should ever take on
+myself to denounce as wilful sin any scruples of conscience which owe
+their origin to honest inquiries after truth. I trust that he knows me
+better now.
+
+Feeling thus decided and certain as to the ground I stand upon, and
+earnestly desirous on every account to investigate the nature of Mr.
+Ruskin's doubts, whatever they might be, in a most fraternal spirit, as
+a kindly-favoured friend and neighbour (for, in our lake and mountain
+district, an interval of a dozen miles does not destroy neighbourhood
+between spirits with any degree of kinship), I sought for a more
+lengthened conversation, and obtained the opportunity without
+difficulty. The occasion was found in a very delightful summer afternoon
+on the lake, and up the sides of the Old Man of Coniston, to view a
+group of remarkable rocks by the desolate, storm-beaten crags of Goat's
+Water,[10] that saddest and loneliest of mountain tarns, which lies in
+the deep hollow between the mountain and its opposing buttress, the Dow
+Crags. This most interesting ramble in the undivided company of one so
+highly and so deservedly valued in the world of letters and of art and
+higher matters yet, served to my mind for more purposes than one, while
+we wandered amidst impressive scenes, passing from the sweet and gentle
+peaceful loveliness of the bright green vale of Coniston and its
+charming lake to the bleak desolation, the terrible sublimity of the
+mountain tarn barriered in by its stupendous crags, amongst which lay
+those singular-looking, weather-beaten, and lightning-riven rocks which
+were the more immediate object of our visit.
+
+ [10] "Deucalion," p. 222.
+
+But to myself the chief and happiest result of our conversation was the
+firm conviction that neither the censorious and unthinking world, nor
+perhaps even Mr. Ruskin himself, knows how deeply and truly a Christian
+man, in the widest sense of the word, Mr. Ruskin is. It is neither the
+time nor the place, nor indeed would it be consistent with propriety, to
+analyze before others the convictions formed on that memorable summer
+afternoon. It must suffice for the present to say that the opinions then
+formed laid the foundation of a friendship on a happier basis than that
+which had heretofore been permitted me, and prepared my way to enter
+with confidence upon the plan of which the present volume is the fruit.
+
+Last June, in the course of a short visit to Brantwood, I proposed to
+Mr. Ruskin to come to address the members of a Northern Clerical
+Society, a body of some seventy or eighty clergy, who have done me the
+honour to appoint me their honorary secretary, now for about nine
+years, since its foundation. On the ground of impaired health, the
+legacy left behind it by the serious illness which had, two years
+before, threatened even his life, Mr. Ruskin excused himself from
+appearing in person before our Society; but proposed instead to write
+letters to me which might serve as a basis for discussion amongst us.
+
+Letter I. will explain the origin of the series that come after.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER II
+
+
+The question laid down in this letter, cleared of all metaphorical
+ornament, is, as is perfectly natural and instinctive with Mr. Ruskin,
+one which goes down to the foundation of things--here, the character and
+mission of the Christian ministry. Are we (Mr. Ruskin implies, Are we
+_not_?) bound to believe and to teach after certain formulae, which,
+being many of them peculiar to ourselves, separate us from the national
+Churches of France and Italy? Are we free, or are we bound? Or do we
+enjoy a reasonable amount of liberty and no more? On the platform we
+occupy do we allow none but English Churchmen to stand? Must we keep all
+other Christians at arm's length? Do the conditions attached to the
+emoluments we receive prohibit us from holding or teaching any other
+opinions than those we have subscribed to?
+
+It is a question not to be approached without a tremor. But no abstract
+answer can well be given. Human nature replies for itself in the
+spectacle of the clergy of the Church of England divided and subdivided;
+here deeply sundered, there of different complexions amicably blending
+together, holding every variety of opinion which the Church allows or
+disallows within her borders. Human nature absolutely refuses to be
+shackled in its positive beliefs. Authority may try, or even appear to
+perform, the feat of fettering thought and making men march in step to
+one common end in orderly ranks; but she has invariably at last to
+confess her impotence.[11]
+
+ [11] The clergyman who subscribes still whispers to himself, or
+ soon will, "Nullius addictus jurare in verba magistri."
+
+The ministers of the Church cannot safely be set free by Act of
+Parliament to teach whatever seems good to each. Some respect must be
+shown to congregations too. If the clergy claim on their side the right
+of independent thought, which they are quite justified in doing, the
+congregations on their side have a much greater right to a consistent
+teaching, which shall not distract their minds with strange and unwonted
+forms of Christianity.
+
+Mr. Ruskin, as he often does, is going _too deep_. He asks for that
+which we shall never see in this world,--the simple, pure religion of
+the Bible to be taught in all singleness and simplicity of mind by men
+whose only commission is held from God, by or without the channel of
+human authority, to show men, women, and children the way "to the summit
+of the celestial mountains," and to set an awful warning by conspicuous
+beacons against the "crevasses which go down quickest to the pit." But
+who shall say that he is wrong? Nay, rather, it is we that are wrong in
+resting satisfied with our low views of things, while Ruskin soars above
+our heads.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER III
+
+
+I would preface the few remarks I wish to make upon this letter by an
+extract from a letter just received from a dear good friend:
+
+ "I have already read these deeply interesting letters five times.
+ They are like 'the foam-globes of leaven.' I must say they have
+ exercised my mind very much. Things in them which at first seem
+ rather startling, prove on closer examination to be full of deep
+ truth. The suggestions in them lead to 'great searchings of heart.'
+ There is much with which I entirely agree; much over which to
+ ponder. What an insight into human nature is shown in the remark
+ that though we are so ready to call ourselves 'miserable sinners'
+ we resent being accused of any special fault!
+
+ "S. B."
+
+By the side of this, it will be instructive, though strange, if I place
+an extract from another note from one whom I have long known and highly
+esteemed; and it will be seen what a singular "discerner of hearts" and
+"divider of spirits" is this series of letters:--
+
+ "If they are really meant _au serieux_, I could not express any
+ opinion of them without implying a reflection upon you also, as you
+ seem to endorse them so fully. I prefer, therefore, to say merely
+ that, as a whole, they offer one of the most remarkable instances I
+ ever met with of the old adage, 'Ne sutor ultra crepidam.'"[12]
+
+ [12] Let me say here, once for all, that I have already three times
+ had this proverb quoted against Mr. Ruskin; and no proverb could be
+ more remote from the purpose. For while it is the shoemaker's
+ business, _as a livelihood_, to make shoes, a painter's to paint
+ pictures, the merchant's to sell goods, and perhaps Mr. Ruskin's to
+ write books which every one reads, _religion is everybody's
+ business_. Christian men and women, of all classes and professions,
+ make the Bible their study, because of its inestimable importance;
+ and who shall say that they are not absolutely right? For my part I
+ should be very glad to hear that my bootmaker was a religious man:
+ his boots would be none the worse for it. I hope the _sutor_ will
+ be brought in no more, unless he can appear with a better grace.
+
+
+In spite of this I retain all my old high opinion of the writer of these
+lines, and feel convinced that he will soon think very differently.
+
+Yes, it is as my first correspondent has said, "Things which at first
+seem startling, on examination prove to be full of deep truth." In the
+short compass of this Letter III. lies enfolded a vast question, which,
+in the midst of the friction and conflict of ages of strife, has been
+shuffled away into odd corners, to be brought out into life only now and
+then, when a man is born into the world who sees what few will even
+glance at, and who will say out that which ought to be spoken, though
+but few may listen. What is the question which is put here so tersely
+and so pointedly? It is this, which I am only putting a little
+differently, not with the most distant idea of improving upon Mr.
+Ruskin's felicitous touches; but, because expressed in twofold fashion,
+what has escaped one may strike another in a different form.
+
+Is a clergyman of the Church of England a teacher of the doctrine and
+practice and discipline of the Church of England within her limits only,
+narrow as they are, when compared with Christendom? or is there not
+rather a wider, more comprehensive Church yet--that of Christ upon
+earth--which he must serve, which he must preach, in forgetfulness of
+the limited boundaries within which by his education and his ordination
+vows he is _apparently_ bound to remain? Is there not enough of
+Christianity common to all the Christian nations upon earth, and which
+ought to be made the subject of teaching to the ignorant and the
+castaway? Is it quite a right thing that the natives of Madagascar, for
+instance, should see parties of missionaries arriving amongst them: one,
+in all the gorgeous trappings and with all the elaborate ritual of Rome;
+another in rusty black coats and hats and dirty white neckties,
+repudiating all but the very barest necessary ceremonial; a third,
+possibly disunited in itself, coming as High Churchmen or Low Churchmen,
+with differing peculiarities? Is this an edifying spectacle for the
+Malagasy? And can the Gospel be preached as effectually in this highly
+diversified fashion as it would be with the simplicity of a reasonable
+and just sufficiently elastic uniformity?
+
+Coming before many people of infinite diversity of mind, it cannot be
+doubted that Christianity must necessarily take a variety of forms, to
+suit different intelligences, and adapt itself to differing situations.
+But in all this large variety of forms of religion, ranging from mere
+paganism at one end, just a little unavoidably altered by the contact of
+Christianity, and at the other extremity a pure religion, but refined
+and intellectual, I do not see exactly what is the form of Christianity
+which the Church of England is to preach to the masses at home and
+abroad. As long as England takes the Gospel to the ignorant in such
+infinitely diversified forms, it is as if an incapable general were to
+divide his forces preparatory to an assault upon a compact and
+well-defended stronghold.
+
+It is enough to make one weep with vexation and humiliation to see what
+sort of religion would be presented to the world if some who claim to
+have all truth on their side could have their own way. I say to have the
+truth on their side,--which is a very different thing from being on the
+side of truth. There is even a new religion--for it is certainly not the
+old--growing popular with "thinkers," who write and read in the three
+great half-crown monthlies, which is evolved in the most curious
+variety out of their inner consciousness by religion-makers, whose
+fertile brains are the only soil that can bring forth such productions.
+What is the vast uneducated world to do with these extraordinary forms
+of religion which are as many-sided and many-faced as their inventors?
+
+Now Mr. Ruskin and many others see this state of things with pity and
+compassion, and ask, "Cannot this Gospel of Christ be put into such
+plain words and short terms as that a plain man may understand it?" Why
+is there no such easy summary provided by authority to teach the poor
+and simple? The Apostles' Creed is good for its own end and purpose, but
+it requires great expansion to be made to include Gospel teaching, and
+it contains nothing practical. The Thirty-nine Articles are not even
+intended (as Mr. Ruskin by some oversight seems to think they are) to be
+a summary of the Gospel. We have no concise and plain, clear and
+intelligible form of sound words to answer this most important end. The
+Church Catechism, from old associations, belongs to childhood.
+
+Every reasonable person must agree with Mr. Ruskin, that there could be
+no harm, but much good, in Christians making a little less of their
+Churchmanship, and a little more of their broad Christianity.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER IV
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin pleads in this letter with touching eloquence for the
+guidance of the law of love, that irresistible law, one effect of which
+is to give to the highest probability the force of a sufficient
+certainty, and establishes in the man the mental habit best described as
+_certitude_.
+
+In Cardinal Newman's "History of My Religious Opinions," p. 18, he
+quotes some beautiful passages from Keble's conversations with himself
+(disagreeing with him all the time), in which he had quoted, "I will
+guide thee _with mine eye_" (Psalm xxxii. 8), as the expression of the
+gentle suasive power that directs the steps of the child and friend of
+God, as distinguished from "the bit and bridle" laid upon horse and
+mule, who represent unwilling slaves recognising no law but that of
+force or coercion. It is an Eye whose gaze is ever fixed on us, the "Eye
+of God's Word," "like that of a portrait uniformly fixed on us, turn
+where we will."[13] And Keble is right so far as concerns the true
+children and friends of God, subject, as their highest control, to the
+law of love. Pure and exalted minds ever strain for, and yearn after, a
+general and outward manifestation of the witness that man is "the image
+and glory of God" (1 Cor. xi. 7).
+
+ [13] "Christian Year," St. Bartholomew's Day, with quotations from
+ Miller's Bampton Lectures.
+
+Unhappily, we are not so constituted by nature. The inroads and ravages
+of sin are but too evident, as well in those upon whom episcopal hands
+have been laid, as in the ranks of the laity. Are not wilfulness and
+pride of intellect and glorification of self ever exercising such a
+power in the earth, that checks and restraints are found absolutely
+necessary to curb and control the determination of many of the ministers
+of the Church not only to _think_ as seems good to them (which they have
+a perfect right to do), but openly to _teach and to preach_ whatever
+doctrines they may have conceived in their own minds, or have learnt
+from others, contrary to the received doctrines of the Church of
+England; which they have no right to do as long as they remain ministers
+of the Church whose doctrines they impugn?
+
+Mr. Ruskin correctly assumes that the terms of the Lord's Prayer, being
+in the very words of Christ, do contain a body of Divine doctrine; and
+they would be the fittest to adopt as a standard of Christian teaching,
+_if_ only all men were as candid, sincere, and straightforward as
+himself. But because there is no certainty that any large and
+preponderating body of men will exhibit these graces of Christianity in
+themselves, and combine with them gentleness, tolerance, and
+forbearance, therefore they _must_ be held in "with bit and
+bridle,"--that is, with Articles and Creeds and declarations,--"lest
+they fall upon thee," and fill the Church more full of sedition,
+disaffection, and disquiet than it already is.
+
+Cardinal Newman himself is an example of the necessity of the restraints
+of creeds, as well, indeed, as of their general inefficiency to
+maintain unity. His "History of my Religious Opinions," at least in its
+beginning, is but the story of a long succession of phases of belief and
+disbelief, originating in--what? In study of the Word of God? in Divine
+contemplation, or in devout and thoughtful meditation? No, indeed; but
+in walks and conversations, now with one friend, now with another, now
+round the Quadrangle of Oriel, then in Christ Church meadows; in
+fanciful, and apparently causeless, changes in his own mind, of which
+sometimes he can give the exact date, sometimes he has forgotten it, but
+which lead him out of one set of opinions into another in a helpless
+kind of way, as if he knew of no motive power but the influence of other
+men's minds or the momentary and fitful fluctuations of a spirit ever
+too much given to introspection to maintain a steady and uniform course.
+
+What a contrast between the downright, manly straightforwardness of a
+Ruskin and the fluttering, uncertain flights of a Newman, ending in the
+cold, dead fixity of the Roman faith, whereof to doubt is to be damned!
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER V
+
+
+The next paragraph to the last in this letter, contains a statement
+which at first might seem to be rashly expressed. But I was not long in
+apprehending that when Mr. Ruskin alludes to a scheme of pardon "for
+which we are supposed to be thankful, not to the Father, but to the
+Son," he was far from impugning that doctrine of the Atonement in which,
+as it is generally understood among Christian people, the whole plan of
+salvation centres.
+
+But there seems to have been a fatality about this sentence. Numbers
+have read it and commented upon it, myself amongst the number, as if Mr.
+Ruskin were here expressing _his own view_; instead of which, he is here
+quoting other men's opinions, to condemn them with severity. The
+_Record_ called it some of Mr. Ruskin's dross; but it is other people's
+dross, for which he would offer us pure gold.
+
+I happened, a very short time previous to receiving this letter, to have
+had my attention attracted by the following passage of Mr. Ruskin's
+own:--"When, in the desert, He was girding Himself for the work of life,
+angels of life came and ministered to Him; now, in the fair world, when
+He is girding Himself for the work of death [at the Transfiguration],
+the ministrants came to Him from the grave. But from the grave
+conquered. One from that tomb under Abarim, which His own hand had
+sealed long ago; the other from the rest which He had entered without
+seeing corruption."
+
+Pleased with the truthful eloquence of this passage, I placed it at the
+head of the chapter on the Transfiguration in my book on the Life and
+Work of Christ (still in the press). Having done so, it struck me that
+Mr. Ruskin, whether intentionally or undesignedly, had made the pronoun
+"His" to apply either to God the Father, or to God the Son. It may
+grammatically refer to either. From this I drew the conclusion which I
+expressed in a short letter to my friend, that, discarding the strictly
+human uses of language, which, from its unavoidable poverty, lacks the
+power of marking the true nature of the difference between the Divine
+Persons of the Holy Trinity, he had spoken of the Father and of the Son
+indiscriminately or indifferently, _i.e._, without a difference.
+
+And so it really is. How shall a man, though at the highest he be "but a
+little lower than the angels," know and comprehend the Godhead in its
+true and exact nature? The names father and son express an earthly
+relation perfectly well understood when belonging to ourselves, but when
+applied to the Supreme Divine Being, they must of necessity fall far
+short of expressing their true connexion with one another. They are,
+when applied to Heavenly beings, merely anthropomorphic terms used in
+compassion to our infirmities, and conveying to us only an approximation
+to the ideas intended. We say the Father sent the Son; the Son suffered
+for our sins. But since Father and Son are One, we are plainly
+expressing something short of the exact state of the case when we speak
+of our thankfulness to the Son as if we had no reason to be equally
+thankful to the Father.
+
+The Athanasian Creed makes no great demand upon our mental powers when
+it requires of us, in speaking of the Trinity, neither to confound the
+Persons nor to divide the Substance; for, in truth, I suppose we are
+equally incapable of doing either.
+
+These are Divine matters, of which, while the simplest may know enough,
+the wisest can never fathom the whole depth. For the Divine power and
+love, knowledge and compassion, will never be fully comprehended until
+we know even as we are known.
+
+But, as I am abstaining from questioning Mr. Ruskin as to his meaning in
+any passage, if it happens to be slightly obscure, awaiting his reply at
+the close of the book, I may here say that I believe that this sentence
+refers to a wild and unscriptural kind of preaching, happily becoming
+less common, in which undue stress is laid upon the wrathfulness of God,
+as contrasted with the mercy of the Saviour, as if we had only the Son
+to thank, and not our loving Father in Heaven, for the blessed hope of
+eternal life. Some there are, and always will be, who habitually err in
+not rightly dividing the Word of God, and giving undue prominence to a
+dark portion of doctrine, which is true enough in itself, but would be
+relieved of much of its gloom, if due prominence were given to other
+parts of the truth of God.
+
+I do not mean to praise caution at the expense of courage. I have a
+constitutional aversion to that caution allied to timidity and cowardice
+which prompts a man to look to his safety, comfort, and worldly repute
+as the first social law that concerns _him_. I admire rather the brave
+man who is ready to sacrifice all that, if he can, by so doing, gain the
+desired right end.
+
+But in the case before us, it is not so. Men talk as if all we had to do
+to convert a sinner from the error of his way was to give him a good
+talking, forgetting that we have not a plastic material to work upon,
+but a most stubborn and intractable one, wherever interest is concerned;
+and that a bold bad man is generally proof against talk, and yields to
+no power but the grace of God exercised directly, and seconded by His
+heavy judgments. Have we not all seen, with shame and astonishment, the
+"wicked rich" regularly in their places at church, much oftener than the
+"wicked poor," who have less interest in playing the hypocrite? And
+have we not felt our utter powerlessness, whether by public preaching or
+by private monition, to find a way to those case-hardened hearts? What
+are we to do with such a man as Tennyson describes in "Sea Dreams," who
+
+ "began to bloat himself, and ooze
+ All over with the fat affectionate smile
+ That makes the widow lean;"
+
+when his victim--
+
+ "Pursued him down the street, and far away,
+ Among the honest shoulders of the crowd,
+ Read rascal in the motions of his back,
+ And scoundrel in the supple-sliding knee."
+
+Here is all that we can do--told us in the last sweet lines:--
+
+ "'She sleeps: let us too, let all evil, sleep.
+ He also sleeps--another sleep than ours.
+ He can do no more wrong: forgive him, dear,
+ And I shall sleep the sounder!'
+ Then the man,
+ 'His deeds yet live, the worst is yet to come;
+ Yet let your sleep for this one night be sound:
+ I do forgive him.'
+ 'Thanks, my love,' she said,
+ 'Your own will be the sweeter;' and they slept."
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER VI
+
+
+As is the manner of our friend, he concludes a letter which was begun
+with thoughtful wisdom, with a proposal which, if gravely made, will
+seem to most of us both unpractical and impracticable.
+
+Very forcible and very true is the emphatic declaration here made of the
+deep, perhaps unpardonable sinfulness of taking in vain the holy name of
+God.
+
+But, to my mind, the irremediable fault in the latter proposition in
+this letter is the assumption that every honest clergyman of average
+capacity, and of ordinary experience of life, is, of course, wise enough
+to discern men's characters and to judge them with that unerring
+sagacity that will enable him to pronounce without favour or distinction
+of persons the severe sentence: "You shall not enter this house of God.
+I interdict your presence here. The comforts and privileges of religion
+are for other than thou. I deny thee the prayers, the preaching, and the
+sacraments of the Church." More briefly--"I excommunicate thee."
+
+Even in the case of a very bad man this would be found impossible to
+accomplish without the direst danger to the clergyman's usefulness and
+influence, to say nothing of his peace. For our experience abundantly
+shows that let a bad man but be audacious, and even ruffianly enough,
+helped by his position, he will always find plenty of support among the
+powerful and influential. The poor and honest clergyman, if he has
+attempted to enforce Church discipline, will be gravely rebuked for his
+want of charity, for his sad lack of discretion or tact, for his utter
+want of worldly wisdom; he will very soon find, to use the familiar
+phrase, the place too hot for him, and he may be thankful if he escapes
+with some small remainder of respect or compassion from the
+nobler-minded of his flock, who are always in a very small minority.
+
+I know not how it really was in the time when the rubrics of the
+Communion Services were framed. One would think, judging from these,
+that the clergyman possessed unlimited power to judge and punish with
+spiritual deprivation, and that he was alone to unite in himself all the
+various offices of accuser and police, counsel, jury, and judge. We are
+required to say every Ash Wednesday that we regret the loss of the godly
+discipline of the Primitive Church--under which, "at the beginning of
+Lent, all such persons as stood convicted of notorious sin were put to
+open penance; and that it is much to be wished that the said discipline
+may be restored again." But few can seriously view a realization of that
+wish without fear for the certain consequences.
+
+The truth is, the world moves on. Human nature may remain the same; but
+the laws and usages of society are subject to changes which it is
+useless to withstand. At the present day, great, rather too great,
+perhaps, are the claims of _charity_. We are told to hope for the best
+in the worst of cases; we are to forgive all, even the still hardened
+and unrepenting; we are to smile upon heresy and schism; we are to treat
+the rude, the churlish, the hard of heart, amidst our flocks, as if we
+had the greatest regard for them! I am not prepared to say that this is
+in every way to be regretted; for these are errors that lean perhaps to
+virtue's side. But I certainly do think that often a little more
+fearlessness in rebuking vice would not come amiss.
+
+But, on the other hand, suppose for a moment the clergy to have the
+undisputed power to bar out both the wicked rich and the wicked poor
+from their churches, this power would be of very little use; nay, it
+would be full of mischief and danger, without a sound judgment, a
+fearless spirit, and a heart little used to the melting mood. The
+clergy, as a class, may perhaps be a trifle superior to the laity in
+moral character, in spiritual knowledge, and in judgment in dealing with
+people, because their profession has early trained (or at any rate,
+ought to have trained) them in the constant and imperative exercise of
+self-examination and self-control, and the careful discernment of
+character in their intercourse with men. But that superiority, if it
+exists at all, is so trifling as to make very little impression on the
+laity, who would naturally be ready at any step to dispute the wisdom or
+expediency of the judicial acts of the clergy.
+
+Further, again: given both the wisdom to judge and the power to doom,
+would it be desirable to establish a rule that the open and notorious
+sinner (though there would always be differences of opinion upon what he
+really is, even among the clergy themselves) should be prevented from
+coming where he might, above all other places, be most likely to hear
+words that would touch his heart and bring him to a better mind? From
+the pulpit, words of counsel, of holy doctrine, and of heart-stirring
+precepts of the Gospel, fall with a power and weight which are rarely to
+be found in private conversations. Many an open and notorious sinner has
+first yielded up his heart to God under the powerful influence of
+preaching. When Jesus sat in the Pharisee's house, all the publicans and
+sinners drew near to hear Him; and the orthodox sinners, the Pharisees,
+made bitter complaints that He received and ate with the scorned and
+rejected sinners. God forbid that the day should ever come when
+spiritual pride and exclusiveness shall shut out even the hardest of
+sinners from the house of God; for who can tell where or when the word
+may be spoken which shall break the stony heart, and replace it with the
+tender heart of flesh, soon to be filled with love and devotion to God
+the Saviour and Redeemer?
+
+But, as this is a subject of great importance, may I also say a word in
+support of Mr. Ruskin's own view that the wicked should be discouraged,
+or even forbidden, to enter the house of God? We have 2 Cor. vi. 14-18,
+which seems to point out that, in the primitive Church, the wicked were
+not allowed in the assemblies of the faithful. And we remember David's
+"I have hated the congregation of evil doers, and will not sit with the
+wicked" (Psalm xxvi. 5). Is not Mr. Ruskin, perhaps, after all, only
+advocating a return to primitive usage?
+
+Mr. Ruskin says in the Preface to his selected works: "What I wrote on
+religion was painstaking, and I think forcible, as compared with most
+religious writing; especially in its frankness and fearlessness."
+Unfortunately he adds, "But it was wholly mistaken."[14] He is still
+equally outspoken, frank, and fearless; but what he wrote upon religion,
+as far as I know it, in the days which he now condemns, will live and do
+good, as long as the noble English language, of which he is one of the
+greatest masters, lives to convey to distant generations the great
+thoughts of the sons that are her proudest boast.
+
+ [14] "Sesame and Lilies," p. iii., 1876.
+
+
+
+
+ ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON THE CENSURES OF THE CHURCH.
+
+ BY THE EDITOR.
+
+
+Since writing my notes on Letter VI., in which Mr. Ruskin gives such
+vehement expression to his desire to see the ancient discipline of the
+Church restored, I have in conversation with himself learned this to be
+one of the objects he has most at heart in writing these letters; and I
+have also read in the Life of Bishop Selwyn, by the Rev. H. W. Tucker
+(vol. i., p. 241) that admirable prelate's view of this disregarded
+question. I believe Selwyn to have been the greatest uninspired
+missionary since the days of St. Paul (if indeed we can with truth
+consider so great a man wholly uninspired). But the great Bishop of the
+South Seas, in the charge from which copious extracts are there given,
+distinctly recommends the revival of spiritual discipline and the
+censures of the Church upon unrepenting offenders. He refers for
+authority to apostolic example and precept, and to the discipline
+rubrics of the Communion Service, and adds the undeniable fact that our
+Anglican communion is the only branch of the Christian Church where such
+discipline is wanting.
+
+I must ask leave to refer my readers to Mr. Tucker's book for the
+grounds in detail of the Bishop's wishes. I am not aware that any
+English prelate has ventured upon so hazardous an experiment; one, I
+should rather say, so certain to fail disastrously. The infancy of the
+Christian Church, and the Divine guidance directly exercised, rendered
+such discipline in the first centuries both practicable and
+effective.[15] But I do not remember that any parish priest of the
+Reformed Church has ever attempted to enforce the Communion rubrics,
+except, as we have learned from the public papers, in recent times, with
+disastrous consequences to the promoters. And what kind of wickedness is
+to be so visited? To prove drunkenness, or impurity, or fraudulent
+practices, or false doctrine (Canon 109), a judicial inquiry must be
+resorted to. Rebukes for lesser offences would certainly lead to
+disputes, if not even to recrimination! The irresistible circumstances
+of the age would entirely defeat any such endeavours. In towns,
+parochial limits are practically unknown or ignored, and families, or
+individuals, attend whatever church or chapel they please, no one
+preventing them, thus making all exercise of sacerdotal authority
+impracticable. In the country, even where only the parish church is
+within reach, it is highly probable that an offender would meet priestly
+excommunication by the easy expedient of cutting himself off from
+communication with his clergyman and his church; and even if he did not,
+it would be a very new state of things if the sentence were received
+with submission on the part of the offender, and acquiescence on that of
+the congregation.
+
+ [15] As these sheets are passing through the press, I happen to
+ meet with these words of Bishop Wilberforce:--"The more I have
+ thought over the matter, the more it seems to me that it was
+ providentially intended that discipline, in the strictest sense of
+ that word, should be the restraint of the early Church, and that it
+ should gradually die out as the Church approached maturity, or
+ rather turn from a formal and external rule to an inner work in the
+ spirit--should run into the opening of God's Word and its
+ application to the individual soul and life."--_Life_, vol. i., p.
+ 230.
+
+In short, the thing is simply impossible; and I do not find that even
+Bishop Selwyn himself visited immorality with ecclesiastical censures,
+or supported his clergy in doing so; and I am using the word
+"immorality" in its full and proper sense, and not with that restricted
+meaning which confines it to a particular sin. It is true, as he says,
+that our Church stands alone in refraining from the exercise of such
+power. But in other religious bodies, the discretionary power to use
+such dangerous weapons is not left to individuals however gifted. It
+rests in a constituted body, on whom the whole responsibility would lie.
+But the isolation of the English clergyman in his church and parish
+forbids him thus to risk his whole usefulness and his social existence.
+Who would confirm him in his judgment? Who would stand by him in the
+troubles which he would assuredly entail upon himself? Would his
+churchwardens, his rural dean, his archdeacon, or his bishop? I think
+there would be little comfort to be found in any of these quarters.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER VII
+
+
+Excellent as is Canon Gray's letter (p. 169), I do not at all concur in
+his somewhat severe censure on the second paragraph in this letter, in
+which Mr. Ruskin, as I conceive, with complete theological accuracy,
+points out how in His human nature our Lord accepted and received some,
+perhaps many, of the deficiencies of our nature, human frailty and
+weakness, even human _liability_ to sin, without, however, once yielding
+to its temptations. I have everywhere in my "Life of Christ" endeavoured
+to give reasons for my faith in this view, which, even if held, I know
+is not often professed.
+
+If Christ had been perfectly insensible to the allurements of sin, where
+would be His fellow-feeling with us? It would be a mere outward
+semblance; nor would there then be any significance in the statement
+that "He was in all points tempted like as we are," if He had been able
+to view with calm indifference the inducements presented to Him from
+time to time to abandon His self-sacrificing work and consult His
+safety. The captain is not to go securely armour-plated into the fight
+while the private soldier marches in his usual unprotected apparel. Nor
+will the Captain of our salvation protect Himself against the dangers
+which He invites us to encounter. If He knew nothing of sin from
+experience of its power, how could He be an example to us? Therefore I
+believe Mr. Ruskin to be perfectly right in affirming that in the words
+of Jesus we listen not to one speaking entirely in the Power and Wisdom
+of God, but to the Son of Man, bowed down, but not conquered, by
+afflictions, firm and unbending in His great purpose to bear in His own
+body the sin of the world--Son of Man, yet God Incarnate.
+
+Nor does it seem to me "a hard way of speaking" when Mr. Ruskin rightly
+and plainly affirms the perfect humanity of Christ, which, however,
+Canon Gray correctly points out to be assumed and borne in accordance
+with His own will as perfect God. I am afraid that, good and kind as he
+is, it is Canon Gray himself who is a little hard in unconsciously
+imputing thoughts which had no existence in the writer's mind!
+
+I cannot help being amused at the gravity with which certain critics
+shake their heads ominously over the last paragraph in this letter, and
+seriously ask, What can Mr. Ruskin mean by the "peace and joy in the
+Holy Ghost" enjoyed by the birds? The Poet Laureate would hardly care to
+be brought to book for each poetical flight with which he charms his
+many appreciative readers, and to be asked to explain exactly what he
+means by each of those noble thoughts which are only revealed from soul
+to soul, and dissolve into fluid, like the beautiful brittle-star of our
+coasts, under the touch of a too curious hand.
+
+How do we know but that the animal existence of these charming
+companions of our quiet hours is not accompanied by a spiritual
+existence too, as much inferior to our own spiritual state as their
+corporeal to ours? And therefore shall we boldly dare to say that they
+perish altogether and for ever? We may neither believe nor disbelieve in
+matters kept so completely secret from us. But we must be pardoned for
+leaning to a belief that the feathered creatures which spend most of
+their brief life in singing loud praises to the loving Creator and Giver
+of all good, do not live quite for nothing beyond the dissolution of
+their little frames. There are no means of ascertaining this by
+scientific experiments, or even by the most ingenious processes of
+induction carefully recorded and duly referred to as occasion may arise.
+But certainly it is a harmless fancy which many have indulged in before
+Mr. Ruskin, without being charged with such unsoundness in doctrine as
+denying the Personality of the Holy Ghost! By-and-by it may be found
+that what men have believed in half in sport will be realized wholly in
+earnest. Just outside the churchyard wall of Ecclesfield may be seen (at
+least I saw it a few years ago) a little monumental stone to a favourite
+dog, with the text, "Thou, Lord, preservest man and beast." And in
+Kingsley's "Prose Idylls" I have just met most _apropos_ with the
+following beautiful passage, which many will read with pleasure, perhaps
+some with profit:--
+
+ "If anyone shall hint to us that we and the birds may have sprung
+ originally from the same type; that the difference between our
+ intellect and theirs is one of degree, and not of kind, we may
+ believe or doubt: but in either case we shall not be greatly moved.
+ 'So much the better for the birds,' we will say, 'and none the
+ worse for us. You raise the birds towards us: but you do not lower
+ us towards them.' What we are, we are by the grace of God. Our own
+ powers and the burden of them we know full well. It does not lessen
+ their dignity or their beauty in our eyes to hear that the birds of
+ the air partake, even a little, of the same gifts of God as we. Of
+ old said St. Guthlac in Crowland, as the swallows sat upon his
+ knee, 'He who leads his life according to the will of God, to him
+ the wild deer and the wild birds draw more near;' and this new
+ theory of yours may prove St. Guthlac right. St. Francis, too--he
+ called the birds his brothers. Whether he was correct, either
+ theologically or zoologically, he was plainly free from that fear
+ of being mistaken for an ape, which haunts so many in these modern
+ times. Perfectly sure that he himself was a spiritual being, he
+ thought it at least possible that birds might be spiritual beings
+ likewise, incarnate like himself in mortal flesh; and saw no
+ degradation to the dignity of human nature in claiming kindred
+ lovingly with creatures so beautiful, so wonderful, who (as he
+ fancied in his old-fashioned way) praised God in the forest, even
+ as angels did in heaven. In a word, the saint, though he was an
+ ascetic, and certainly no man of science, was yet a poet, and
+ somewhat of a philosopher; and would possibly--so do extremes
+ meet--have hailed as orthodox, while we hail as truly scientific,
+ Wordsworth's great saying--
+
+ 'Therefore am I still
+ A lover of the meadows and the woods
+ And mountains; and of all that we behold
+ From this green earth; of all the mighty world
+ Of eye and ear--both what they half create,
+ And what perceive; well pleased to recognize
+ In Nature and the language of the sense,
+ The anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse,
+ The guide, the guardian of my heart, and soul
+ Of all my moral being.'"
+
+ _Charm of Birds._
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER VIII
+
+
+What generous and enlightened spirit will not be stirred to its
+innermost depths by these words, burning as they are with a
+well-grounded indignation?
+
+I dare say some of the clergy will have a word to say on their claim to
+the priesthood as implying a sacrificial and mediatorial character. On
+this point I will say nothing at present.
+
+But it is an awfully solemn consideration put before us here, whether
+instead of the pure blessings and the bright countenances intended to
+be ours, our accursed blessings and defiled faces are not the natural
+consequences of our wilful misunderstanding of what the will of the Lord
+is.
+
+"Thy will be done" is a petition which can be offered up in two quite
+distinct senses. In the one, it is an expression of resignation to the
+Father's afflictive dispensations; in the other, the heartfelt desire to
+work out the revealed will of God in all the many-sided aspects of life.
+In the first sense, when sorrow or death has entered our door, our first
+impulse, if we are Christians, is to give evidence of, and expression
+to, our resignation by recognizing the _will of God_. Hence Mr. Ruskin
+interposes: "Are you so sure that it _was_ the will of God that your
+child should die, or that you should have got into that trouble?" I look
+in my local paper in the column of deaths, and see in a neighbouring
+large town how extraordinary a proportion of deaths are those of
+children. I have taken occasional cemetery duty in one of the busiest
+centres of industry in Yorkshire, and was shocked at the large numbers
+of funerals in white. Am I to believe it was the _will of God_ that so
+many young children should perish, especially as I look to my own
+beautiful parish, with its sweet sea and mountain breezes mingled, where
+the deaths of children are comparatively rare? and am I not forced to
+believe that, even without the assistance of destitution--neglect and
+overcrowding, and "quieting mixtures" and ardent spirits, and kicks and
+blows have filled most of those little graves? I fear that the will of
+Satan is here being accomplished vastly to his satisfaction. And seldom
+does the Government do more than touch the fringe of these monstrous
+evils. Of course they say "We cannot interfere," or "Legislation in
+these matters is impracticable." But can we not all remember when it was
+just as certain that free trade in food was impracticable? but who does
+not see that it is saving us from famine this dark year 1879?--that
+compulsory education was revolutionary and full of unimaginable perils
+to the country, and yet who are so glad as the poor themselves, now that
+it has been carried into effect? It used to be thought that if people
+chose to kill themselves with unwholesome open drains before their
+doors, there was no power able to prevent them. But we are wiser now.
+Legislators have generally been, or chosen to appear, like cowards till
+the time for action came, very late, and then they were decided enough.
+Now let us hope that a way may be found to save infant life from
+premature extinction by wholesale.
+
+Let me use this opportunity of saying that in the letters we are now
+considering there is a feature which ought not to escape those who are
+desirous of deriving good from them; and that is that in their very
+condensed form no time is taken for explanation or expansion. Mr. Ruskin
+speaks as unto wise men, and asks us to judge for ourselves what he
+says. But my own experience, after frequent perusal of them, shows me
+that there is a vast fund of truth in them which becomes apparent only
+after patient consideration and reflection. Without desiring at all to
+bestow extravagant praise on my kind friend, or any other distinguished
+man, it is only fair and just to own that the truth that is in these
+letters shines out more and more the more closely they are examined. It
+is a gift that God has given him, which has cost him far more pain,
+worry, and vexation, through all kinds of wilful and envious, as well as
+innocent and unconscious misrepresentation, than ever it has gained him
+of credit or renown.
+
+This principle leads me to view _now_ with approbation what I could not
+read at first without an unpleasant feeling. The sentence: "Nearly the
+whole Missionary body (with the hottest Evangelical section of the
+English Church) is at this moment composed of men who think the Gospel
+they are to carry to mend the world with, forsooth, is this, 'If any man
+sin, he hath an Advocate with the Father.'" And when I first read it to
+my reverend brethren, hard words were spoken of this passage, because in
+its terseness, in its elliptic form, it easily allows itself to be
+misunderstood. Yet the paragraph contains the essence of the Gospel
+expressed with a faithful boldness not often met with in pulpit
+addresses.
+
+"If any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father." We have here a
+solemn and momentous truth, expressed in few words, as clearly and as
+briefly as any geometrical definition. But is this _all_ the Gospel?
+Will this alone "mend the world, forsooth"? Now the extreme men of one
+particular school in the English Church do really preach little else
+beside this. When they are entreated to preach upon good works, too, and
+unfold a little of their value and beauty,--if they have any at
+all,--the answer is always to the effect, "Oh, of course; faith in
+Christ must of necessity beget the love of good works. These are the
+signs of that. Preach Christ crucified, and all the rest will be sure to
+follow." And this is what is exclusively called "preaching the Gospel."
+The preacher who teaches us to love our enemies, to live pure lives, to
+be honourable to all men and women, to bring up our families in the
+truth, is frowned upon as a "legal preacher." As a clergyman myself, I
+am not afraid of saying that I look upon this so-called Gospel-preaching
+as fraught with not a little of danger. God knows, wicked sinners are
+found in every congregation and class of men, kneeling to pray, and
+singing praises, exactly like good men. Now I can hardly conceive a
+style and matter of preaching more calculated to excuse and palliate,
+and almost encourage sin, than this narrow and exclusive so-called
+Gospel-preaching. Neither Christ nor His apostles taught thus at all.
+The whole Sermon on the Mount is moral in the highest and purest sense.
+Every epistle has its moral or _legal_ side. "Woe is me if I preach not
+the Gospel!" and I cannot be preaching the Gospel unless, along with the
+great proclamation, "If any man sin, we have an Advocate with the
+Father," I also do my utmost to teach "what the will of the Lord is"
+concerning a pure, holy, and blameless life, full of active, good works,
+done in deep humility and self-abasement; because Christ loved me and
+died for me, and asks me, in love to Him, to walk in His steps.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER IX
+
+
+I fancy I can still hear the murmur of angry dissent pass round as I
+read to my reverend brethren this indignant plea for a higher
+interpretation of the petition for daily bread than that which passes
+current with the unthinking, self-indulgent world. Nevertheless, this
+manifestation of feeling was not general, and I thoroughly agree with
+Mr. Ruskin that the world has, from the first, used this prayer
+thoughtlessly and blasphemously; and probably will continue to do so to
+the end, when the thoughts and imaginations of all men's hearts shall be
+revealed, and no more disguises shall be possible; when the masked
+hypocrite's smile shall be torn from him and reveal the covetousness
+that breeds in his heart to its core; when the honourable man shall no
+longer be confounded with thieves, nor the usurer and extortioner be
+courted and bowed to like an honest man.
+
+The veil that hid the true Christ, as Mr. Ruskin has well remarked, was
+removed in the breaking of bread with the disciples at Emmaus. As the
+Master, so the true disciples. They too may be known both by the
+spiritual breaking of the Bread of Life in the Holy Communion (though
+the canting hypocrite too may be found polluting that holy rite); but
+more especially in the union of the sacred ordinance with obedience to
+the scarcely less sacred command of Christian love and charity to the
+poor. There may be the empty profession, but there will be none of the
+reality of the religion of the Gospel, unless we are partakers of the
+bread broken at the Lord's Table, or unless we eat the bread earned by
+the honest labour of our hands or of our brains, or share some of our
+bread with those, the Lord's brethren, whom He has left for us to care
+for in His name. The absence of either of these three essential
+conditions just lays us open to the charge of flaunting before the world
+a false and spurious Christianity. In the plain words of our friend, our
+bread not being fairly got or fairly used, is stolen bread.
+
+But I would willingly believe that it is only by a strong figure of
+speech that we clergy are here again emphatically called upon to act the
+part of inquisitors by pointedly demanding of every member of our flock
+a precise account of the manner in which he earns his livelihood. Still,
+if the answer was not a surprised and indignant stare, I believe the
+great mass of men would probably be able to give an answer which should
+abundantly satisfy themselves and us, until Mr. Ruskin threw his own
+light upon the answer and demonstrated that the notions of modern
+civilized society are not in accordance with the highest teaching.
+According to our ideas, the artisan, the tradesman, the merchant, the
+members of the learned and the military and naval professions, all those
+engaged in the various departments of government work, from the cabinet
+minister down to the last office clerk,--all these use the labour of
+body or of mind, and in return receive the necessaries or the luxuries
+of life for themselves and their households. Men who are, if they
+please, exempt altogether from such labour, as large landed proprietors,
+are certainly under a temptation to lead a life of ease and leisure. But
+it is very seldom that we are offended with the sight of a landlord so
+unmindful of social duties as to take no personal active interest in the
+welfare and conduct of his tenants, or forgetful of the responsibilities
+to his country imposed upon him by his rank and position.
+
+It is to be hoped that Mr. Ruskin does not in all solemn seriousness
+really expect that after a fair examination of the modes of life of all
+these people, "an entirely new view of life and its sacraments will
+open upon us and them." Is it indeed a fact that "the great mass of men
+calling themselves Christians do actually live by robbing the poor of
+their bread, and by no other trade whatsoever"? Mr. Ruskin is always
+terribly in earnest in whatever he says, and we must look for an
+explanation of this sentence in the very decided views he holds upon
+interest of money, which he calls usury.
+
+Mr. Ruskin classes Usury and Interest together. Here are some of his
+strong words upon this subject: "There is absolutely no debate possible
+as to what usury is, any more than what adultery is. The Church has only
+been polluted by indulgence in it since the 16th century. Usury is any
+kind whatever of interest on loan, and it is the essential modern force
+of Satan." This was written September 9th of this year. In "Fors
+Clavigera," Letter lxxxii., p. 323, he challenged the Bishop of
+Manchester to answer him the question, whether he considered "usury to
+be a work of the Lord"?[16] In the same letter, to place his heavy
+denunciation against the wickedness of usury in the best possible
+company, he pleads: "Plato's scheme was impossible even in his own
+day,--as Bacon's New Atlantis in _his_ day,--as Calvin's reform in _his_
+day,--as Goethe's Academe in his; but of the good there was in all these
+men, the world gathered what it could find of evil."
+
+ [16] See _Contemporary Review_, February 1880.
+
+Let us look a little closer into this matter. It is not because a man
+with fearless frankness breasts the full torrent of popular persuasion
+and universal practice that he is to be thrust aside as a fanatic, with
+hard words and unfeeling sneers concerning his sanity. Here, again, I
+avow my persuasion that Mr. Ruskin is, in one sense, too far in advance,
+and, in another, too far in the rear of the time; and while I attempt an
+explanatory justification of the modern practice, I admit that it is
+only "for the hardness of our hearts" and because the golden age is
+still far off.
+
+The Mosaic law was severe against usury and increase, forbidding it
+under heavy threatenings among the faithful Israelites, but allowing it
+in lending to strangers. "If thy brother be waxen poor, then thou shalt
+relieve him ... take thou no usury of him, or increase" (Lev. xxv. 35,
+36). "Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money,
+usury of victuals, usury of anything that is lent upon usury. _Unto a
+stranger_ thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt
+not lend upon usury" (Deut. xxiii. 19, 20). "Lord, who shall abide in
+Thy tabernacle? ... He that putteth not out his money to usury" (Psalm
+xv. 1, 5. See Ezek. xviii. 7, etc.) And to come to the Christian law, we
+have the mild general principle: "If ye lend to them of whom ye hope to
+receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to
+receive as much again.... Lend, hoping for nothing again, and your
+reward shall be great" (Luke vi. 34, 35).
+
+So far the Law of Moses and the Gospel.
+
+But our Lord, in the Parable of the Talents, appears to actually
+sanction the practice of loans upon interest: "Thou oughtest, therefore,
+to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should
+have received mine own with usury" (Matt. xxv. 27). The preceding verse,
+the 26th, may well be understood to be a question--Didst thou indeed
+think so? It does not even indirectly attribute hardness and oppression
+to our Lord.[17] I am quite aware that it may be replied that this is an
+instance of those strong audacious metaphors, where the fact used by way
+of illustration is instinctively overleaped by the mind of the hearer to
+arrive at the lesson which it marks and emphasizes; as when the Lord is
+represented as an unjust judge, or Paul speaks of grafting the wild
+olive branch upon the good, or James refers to the rust and canker upon
+gold and silver, or Milton speaks of certain bishops as "blind
+mouths."[18] But in all these cases, the hyperbole is manifest; it is an
+untruth or a disguise, which not only does not deceive, but teaches a
+great truth. Our Lord's reference to money-lenders or exchangers appears
+to lend an indirect sanction to a familiar practice.
+
+ [17] The owners of five talents and of two talents are commended
+ for making cent. per cent. of their money; but the man who hid away
+ his one talent, as French peasants do, and brought it to his Lord
+ untouched and undiminished, received a severe rebuke.
+
+ [18] Lycidas. See "Sesame and Lilies," p. 27.
+
+The Law of Moses, therefore, rebuking the practice of lending for
+increase among brethren and encouraging it in dealing with strangers,
+combined with the well-known avarice of the Jews to make them
+money-lenders on a large scale, and at high rates of interest, to the
+prodigals and spendthrifts, the bankrupt barons and needy sovereigns of
+the middle ages. Money was rarely lent for commercial purposes, and to
+advance the real prosperity of the borrower. It was generally to stave
+off want for the time; and principal and interest, when pay-day came,
+had generally to be found in the pastures or strongholds of the enemy.
+High interest was charged, on account of the extraordinary
+precariousness of what was called the security. Grinding and grasping
+undoubtedly the money-lenders would be, from the hardship of their case.
+Reckless extravagance and lavish profusion were, in those non-commercial
+ages, highly applauded. The spendthrift and the prodigal was the
+favourite of the multitude; the rich money-lender was hated and abused,
+while his money-bags were sought after with all the eagerness of
+hard-driving poverty. They reviled the careful and economical Israelite;
+they looked with horror upon his vast accumulations of capital, and
+never remembered to thank him for the safety they owed to him from the
+violent hands of their own soldiers and retainers.
+
+All this went on until the sixteenth or seventeenth century. I have
+before me a very curious old book, lent to me by Mr. Ruskin, entitled,
+"The English Usurer: or, Usury Condemned by the most learned and famous
+Divines of the Church of England. Collected by John Blaxton, Preacher of
+God's Word at Osmington, in Dorsetshire, 1634."
+
+The language throughout the book is of extreme violence against all
+manner of usury. The compiler gives a collection of the most emphatic
+testimonies of the greatest preachers of the day against this
+"detestable vice." Bishop Jewell calls it "a most filthy trade, a trade
+which God detesteth, a trade which is the very overthrow of all
+Christian love." There is, it must be admitted, no sort of argument
+attempted in the long extract from Bishop Jewell's sermon to demonstrate
+the wickedness of the practice against which he launches his fierce
+invectives, but he certainly brings his sermon to a conclusion with a
+threat of extreme measures "if they continue therein. I will open their
+shame and denounce excommunication against them, and publish their names
+in this place before you all, that you may know them, and abhor them as
+the plagues and monsters of this world; that if they be past all fear of
+God, they may yet repent and amend for worldly shame."
+
+This was Bishop Jewell preaching in the middle of the 16th century; and
+such were the strong terms very generally employed by good and
+thoughtful men at that day. Bacon (Essay 41) says that one of the
+objections against usury is that "it is against nature for money to
+beget money!" Antonio, in "The Merchant of Venice," asks:
+
+ "When did friendship take
+ A _breed_ of barren metal of his friend?"
+
+And his practice was "neither to lend nor borrow by taking nor giving of
+excess," which brought upon him the malice and vindictiveness of the
+Jew--
+
+ "that in low simplicity
+ He lends out money gratis, and brings down
+ The rate of usance here with us in Venice."
+
+Philip, in Tennyson's "Brook "--a simple man in later times--
+
+ "Could not understand how money breeds,
+ Thought it a dead thing."
+
+But there were men, too, who saw that the taking of moderate interest
+was a blameless act. Calvin was a contemporary of Bishop Jewell, and his
+mind exhibits a curious mixture of feelings upon the subject. Blaxton
+triumphantly places a sentence from Calvin's "Epistola de Usura" as a
+battle-flag in his title-page:--
+
+"In republica bene constituta nemo faenerator tolerabilis est; sed omnino
+debet e consortio hominum rejici." "An usurer is not tolerable in a
+well-established Commonwealth, but utterly to be rejected out of the
+company of men." So again, in his Commentary on Deuteronomy. But again,
+in a passage quoted from the same author, without reference, in Dugald
+Stewart's Preliminary Dissertation (Encyd. Brit.) we come across a
+different view.
+
+"'Money begets not money!'--What does the sea beget? What the house for
+which I receive rent? Is silver brought forth from the walls and the
+roof? But that is produced from land, and that is drawn forth from the
+sea, which shall produce money; and the convenience of a house is paid
+for with a stipulated sum. Now if better profit can be derived from the
+letting out of money than by the letting of an estate, shall a profit be
+made by letting perhaps some barren land to a farmer, and shall it not
+be allowed to him who lends a sum of money? He who gets an estate by
+purchase, shall he not from that money derive an annual profit? Whence
+then is the merchant's profit? You will say, from his diligence and
+industry. Does anyone suppose that money ought to lie idle and
+unprofitable? He who borrows of me is not going to let the loan lie
+idle. He is not going to draw profit from the money itself, but from the
+goods bought with it. Those reasonings, therefore, against usury are
+subtle, and have a certain plausibility; but they fall as soon as they
+are examined more narrowly. I therefore conclude that we are to judge of
+usury, not from any particular passage of Scripture, but by the ordinary
+rules of justice and equity."
+
+To come at once to modern days and practical views. Let us suppose
+lending on interest forbidden by the Church and the law. Then sums of
+money required for good and legitimate business purposes must be begged
+as a great favour. No honourable man would do this. The instinctive
+repugnance felt by an independent man to place himself under pecuniary
+obligations which he could not reciprocate would stop many a promising
+young man of slender means from going to college, many a good man of
+business from using the most favourable opportunities. I am not speaking
+of borrowing money to gain temporary relief from pecuniary
+embarrassment, but of money honourably desired to realize advantages of
+apparent life-value. So the necessitous would be doomed to remain in
+hopeless necessity until some benevolently-minded person with a mass of
+loose unemployed capital came to his rescue, and such men are not to be
+met with every day.
+
+So far for the man who would like to borrow, but that the law will not
+allow it except as a free loan or gift. Then for the willing lender, if
+he dared. He has, say, a few thousands in hand, which he does not wish
+to spend. He looks round, if he is anxious to use it for good, for an
+object of his charity who seems least likely to disappoint him. Does our
+experience of human nature teach that a sense of gratitude for benefits
+received is a good security for honourable conduct? Alas! in a multitude
+of cases--I fear the majority--the lender would only be met with cold
+and alienated looks when he expected to receive his own again, if indeed
+he found anywhere at all the object of his kindness. The memory of past
+ingratitude, the fear of worse to come, would dry the sources of
+benevolence, and make the upright and honest to suffer equally with the
+swindler and the hypocrite.
+
+But there is no such fear now. The recognized system of lending upon
+approved security for a fair and moderate rate of interest removes the
+irksome, galling sense of obligation, and enables any man to borrow with
+a feeling that if he receives an obligation he is also conferring one;
+that if he makes ten per cent. by trading, or a good stipend by his
+degree, he will divide his profits fairly with the man who served him,
+and that he is helping him in his turn to keep his money together for
+the sake of his children after him. Take away these benefits, and what
+good is done by free lending? Not any that we can see with ordinary
+eyes, but a good deal of suspicion, disappointment, ingratitude, and
+loss.
+
+An honourable man would a hundred times rather accept a loan as a matter
+of profit to the lender than as a charity to himself. The right result
+of an honourable system of borrowing and lending with equal advantage to
+both, _is_ the will of God, and not contrary to sanctification. The
+result of a compulsory system of charitable loans would lead only to the
+destruction of credit and mutual confidence, and the sacrifice of a
+multitude of Christian graces and virtues.
+
+We cannot help observing with what vehemence Mr. Ruskin constantly
+thrusts the thief, the adulterer, and the usurer all into the same boat
+to be tossed against the breakers of his wrath. Now I would ask some one
+of those numerous disciples of his, whose affection almost prompts them
+to say to him, "I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest," "Pray, my
+good friend, what is your own practice? Providence has blessed you with
+ease and affluence far more than you need for daily bread. What do you
+do with your money? Of course you would never think of investing in
+consols, in railway shares, or dock-bonds, would you? you would not lend
+money upon mortgage, or exact rent for your household and landed
+property? I see that you hesitate a little; you have something to
+confess. Come! what is it?" And my amiable friend replies, "Oh, but you
+see all the world is gone after interest of money; all our mutual
+relations are so intimately bound up with that accursed, abominable
+practice, that I have no alternative. _I have_ large sums lodged in
+various safe investments, and employ an agent to collect my rents and
+settle with my tenants." And so I am forced to exclaim, "What! you who
+are persuaded that usury, and theft, and adultery, are all of equal
+blackness, if you find that one sin is unavoidable, what about the other
+two? Would you then invite the robber and the licentious to sin with
+impunity, as you practise your own convenient iniquity, with the
+applause of the world and your own acquiescence?"
+
+Positively I see no escape from this argument. It is the _argumentum ad
+hominem_,--generally an uncivil mode of address; but here, at any rate,
+it is impersonally used.
+
+These are my views frankly stated. If I am wrong, even by the highest
+standard of Christian ethics, I shall be thankful for Mr. Ruskin's
+corrections.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER X
+
+
+The letters which I have received up to the present time (October 31st)
+in reply to Mr. Ruskin's have not failed to bring me not a little of
+disappointment. On the one hand, I see a man noble and elevated in his
+aims, and with highest aspirations, desiring nothing so fervently as to
+see the world and its pastors and teachers rising to the highest
+attainable level of religious and moral excellence; fearlessly rebuking
+the evils he sees so clearly; clothing thoughts that consume him in
+words that stir our inmost hearts; and yet I see him unavoidably missing
+his aim as all men are liable to do, through the defect of possessing
+human language alone as the channel to convey divine meanings; and,
+moreover, who cannot at every turn stay the course of their reasoning to
+explain that that which they speak apparently, and from the necessities
+of language, to _all_, is, as the most ordinary apprehension would
+perceive, really addressed to _some_.
+
+On the other side, while I hear many expressing their thankfulness that
+things are now being said that "wanted saying," and are being spoken out
+with uncompromising boldness, others receive them with impatience, with
+irritation, with exasperation. I have been gravely advised to recommend
+Mr. Ruskin to withdraw these letters, to wash my hands of them, etc.
+Sometimes this arises from unfamiliarity with Mr. Ruskin's most famous
+works; sometimes from entire unacquaintance with their number and their
+nature; as when a friend wrote to me before he saw or heard a word of
+the letters:--
+
+"If Mr. Ruskin thinks we have generally read his _publication_ (_sic_)
+I think he is mistaken; all I know of _it_ is that I have occasionally
+seen _it_ quoted in newspapers, from which I gather that he holds
+peculiar opinions."
+
+A lady, who looked well to the ways of her household, but knew very
+little of books, once asked me if Mr. Ruskin had not written a book
+called the "Old Red Sandstone." I hinted that probably she meant the
+"Stones of Venice," which was indeed the case. She knew it was something
+about stones! But she was an excellent creature nevertheless!
+
+These two traits may fairly be paired together.
+
+It should be observed, by clergymen especially who read these letters
+attentively, that they contain just what we clergy ought to be told
+sometimes by laymen, to whom we preach with perfect impunity, but who as
+a rule rarely make reply. I have just read Lord Carnarvon's excellent
+address on Preaching, delivered at the Winchester Diocesan Conference,
+and thank him as I thank, and for the same reason that I thank, Mr.
+Ruskin. We need to be told wholesome though unpalatable truths
+sometimes, when we have descended from our castle-pulpits to meet, it
+may be, the eyes, and hear the voices, of impatient, irritated, and
+prejudiced critics.
+
+I do not remember that so bold an attack, and yet so friendly, has ever
+before been made upon our weak points in modern times; and I may justly
+claim for Mr. Ruskin's letters a calm, self-searching, and, if need be,
+a self-condemning and self-sacrificing, examination. We are all too apt
+to cry "Peace, peace, where there is no peace." Why should the shepherds
+of Britain claim for themselves a more indulgent regard than the
+shepherds of Israel, whom Ezekiel, by the word of the Lord, addressed in
+the 33rd and 34th chapters of his prophecy?
+
+Concerning the letter before us on the forgiveness of sins--each other's
+sins or debts, and our sins before God--it is not a question of
+theology, but of simple moral right and wrong; and I defy Mr. Ruskin's
+bitterest censors to deny, that, in this wicked world, men are more in
+earnest in deceiving, injuring, and swindling their friends than they
+are in seeking the love of their enemies. Has not our Lord told us long
+ago that "the children of this world are wiser" (that is, more earnest,
+consistent, and thorough-going) "in their generation than the children
+of light"?
+
+It is of extreme difficulty to _understand_ the clause, says Mr. Ruskin.
+Replies some slow-witted preacher: "Where is the difficulty? I both
+understand it and explain it with perfect ease!" What! understand the
+precious conditions on which forgiveness will be extended to us! The
+question of God's forgiveness is not a _simple_ question. It is
+complicated by its relation to men's mutual forgiveness of each other,
+and that again by the practical difficulty of knowing when we can, and
+when, from the very nature of the case, we cannot, forgive. Here are
+surely elements of difficulty quite sufficient to justify the remark
+that "the clause is one of such difficulty that, to understand it, means
+almost to know the love of God which passeth knowledge."
+
+But we may, at any rate, guard our people against _misunderstanding_ it;
+and they are guilty, and full of guilt, who live in sin,--sins of
+avarice, of ill temper, of calumny, of hatred, of sensuality, and of
+unforgivingness, and yet daily ask to be forgiven, because, forsooth,
+they are innocent of any bad intention!
+
+No man or woman who sins with the knowledge that it _is_ sin can have
+God's forgiveness. It is no use to plead the frailty of the flesh. It is
+wilful, knowing, deliberate sin; and it will not be forgiven without a
+very living, earnest, and working faith indeed.
+
+I question much whether we preachers of the Gospel say enough upon this
+point,--not at all that we underrate its importance, nor that we
+overrate the importance of that which we are apt to call Gospel
+preaching [Greek: kat' exochen], namely, the doctrine of the atonement
+by the Blood of Christ, which is the brightness and glory of the Gospel
+message, but is no more all of it than that the sum of the Lord's Prayer
+is contained in one of its clauses.
+
+"As we forgive them that trespass against us." Shall I be pardoned for
+venturing here upon a remark which seems needful to make in the presence
+of so much that appears to be erroneous on the subject of human
+forgiveness? And it is more especially necessary to be understood in
+the case of the clergy, because such large demands are made upon their
+forgiveness as it is impossible to satisfy. I do not at all say that
+there are trespasses which men cannot forgive,--sins, I mean, of the
+ordinary type, and not crimes. But I do say that there are times and
+circumstances under which forgiveness is a moral impossibility. And yet
+the world expects a clergyman to be ever walking up and down in society
+with forgiveness on his lips and forgiveness in both his hands. Our Lord
+said, "If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and _if he
+repent_, forgive him" (Luke xvii. 3); and forgiveness is to follow each
+successive profession of repentance. And in Matt. xviii. 22, though
+repentance is not named, it is manifestly implied. In 2 Cor. ii. 7,
+again, sorrow for the sin is a condition of forgiveness. This, then, is
+the rule and condition of forgiveness, that our brother _repent_; and
+manifestly it must be so; for the act of forgiveness requires a
+correlative disposition to seek and receive forgiveness, just as a gift
+implies not only a giver but a receiver, or it cannot be a gift, do what
+we will. I think this is extremely apt to be overlooked even by the
+larger, that is, the more emotional and impulsive part of the world,
+though not, of course, by the more thoughtful; and clergymen especially
+are asked to speak fair, and sue for peace, and all but ask for
+forgiveness of those who are habitually and obstinately bent upon doing
+them all the wrong and injury in their power, and using them with the
+most intolerable harshness.
+
+What, then, does true religion require of us if such circumstances make
+forgiveness impossible? To be ever ready, ever prepared to forgive; to
+seek every opening, every avenue to peace without sacrifice of
+self-respect and manly independence; to watch for opportunities to do
+kindnesses to the most inveterate enemy,--even where a change of heart
+appears hopeless. This is possible to a Christian, and this is what
+Christ demands. But He does not demand impossibilities. He does not ask
+us to do more than our Heavenly Father Himself, who forgives the
+returning sinner even "a great way off," if his face be but homeward;
+but says nothing of forgiveness to him whose back is towards his home,
+and whose heart dwells far away.
+
+I am sure Mr. Ruskin does not mean that no clergyman is sensible of the
+guilt of sins of omission. But he is speaking as a layman, who has heard
+in his time a great many preachers, and it is very probable indeed that
+he has not heard many dwell long and forcibly on the fact, which is
+indeed a fact, that the guilt of sins of omission is the burden of
+Christ's teaching, and that more parables and more preaching are
+directed against the sin of doing nothing at all than against the
+positive and active wickedness of bad men. If we will be candid, we must
+agree with him that in our general teaching we do lay much less emphasis
+on such sins than our Lord does in _His_ teaching.
+
+But in the paragraph which follows, I confess that, following up a
+charge which is sadly too true, that there is a grotesque inconsistency
+"in the willingness of human nature to be taxed with any quantity of
+sins in the gross, and its resentment at the insinuation of having
+committed the smallest parcel of them in detail," there comes a
+sentence in which the Christian philosopher loses himself in the caustic
+satirist, and that this vein continues to the end of the letter. In
+satire, such is its very essence, truth is ever travestied. It is truth
+still, but the truth in unfamiliar, and, for the most part, unacceptable
+guise. There is just an undercurrent of truth, and no more, in the
+statement, not very seriously made, one would suppose, that the English
+Liturgy was "drawn up with the amiable intention of making religion as
+pleasant as possible, to a people desirous of saving their souls with no
+great degree of personal inconvenience."
+
+If the whole naked truth were spoken with the deepest gravity that the
+awful pressure of our sins demands, the English Liturgy would be a
+continuous wail of grief and repentance. For if anything is great, and
+loud, and urgent, it is the cry of our sins. But co-extensive with our
+sins is the love of our Father; and, therefore, our mourning is changed
+into rejoicing and thankfulness, and this picture of the sinner
+"dexterously concealing the manner of his sin from man, and
+triumphantly confessing the quantity of it to God," is merely a satire.
+
+The next paragraph is more bitter still; but happily for the cause of
+sober truth, it is satire again; and nothing can be more obvious than
+the fact that prayer, to be Common Prayer, cannot at the same time suit
+every condition of mind, the calm and the agitated, the strained and the
+relaxed, the rejoicing and the sorrowful. But we are not dependent upon
+public worship for the satisfaction of our spiritual wants, as long as
+we can resort to private prayer and family prayer. And, indeed, it
+requires no wonderful stretch of our powers of adaptation to use the
+most strenuous private prayer in the midst of the congregation; and the
+"remorseful publican" and the "timid sinner" are not bound to the words
+before them, or if they do follow these words, I am sure there is enough
+depth in them to satisfy the views of the most conscience-stricken.
+Common Prayer is calm to the calm, and passionate to the passionate. It
+is all things to all men, just according to their frame of mind at the
+time.
+
+But alas for my good kind friend! as we get nearer to the end of the
+letter, the satire waxes fiercer, and the adherence to the truth of
+nature grows fainter. Does Mr. Ruskin seriously, or only sarcastically,
+tell us that the assaults upon the divine power of prayer gain any force
+from the circumstance that we are constrained to pray daily for
+forgiveness, never getting so far as to need it no longer? From the
+first day that we lisped at our mother's knee, "Forgive us our
+trespasses," until, bowed with age, we _still_ say, "Forgive us our
+trespasses," we have never stood, and never will stand, one day less in
+need of forgiveness than another day--or our Lord would have provided a
+thanksgiving and a prayer for the perfected.
+
+I believe everywhere else I recognize, even in the most startling
+passages, an element of truth. But in the latter half of this letter,
+not even the large amount of acrimony and severity allowed to the mode
+of address called satire can quite reconcile us to its marvellous
+asperity.
+
+
+
+
+ ON LETTER XI
+
+
+I cannot but feel astonished and grieved at the perversity of those
+who[19] persist in looking upon Mr. Ruskin as altogether a noxious kind
+of a scribbler, and likely to do much injury by the unflagging constancy
+with which he perseveres in pointing his finger at all our weak and sore
+places. And yet it cannot be said that even if he does "lade men with
+burdens grievous to be borne," he himself "touches not the burdens with
+one of his fingers."
+
+ [19] It was but yesterday that a voice reached me from one of the
+ remotest of our Ultima Thules amongst these mountains, affirming,
+ with something like self-gratulation, that he "cared less than
+ nothing for anything Mr. Ruskin might write outside the subject of
+ Art!" Yet one of the best of our Bishops--and we have many good
+ ones--wrote by the same post: "Mr. Ruskin's letters are full of
+ suggestive thoughts, and must do anyone good, if only in getting
+ one out of the ruts." But, alas! against this I must needs set the
+ dictum of another dignitary of the Church, an intensely practical
+ man: "I have a great reverence for Mr. Ruskin's genius, and for
+ what he has written in time past, and on this account I would
+ rather not say a single word in comment upon these letters;" and
+ again--"I really could not discuss them seriously."
+
+But let us consider this last letter. Is not every word of it
+true--severely and austerely true,--but still true? But yet here still
+the fault remains (though I say it with the utmost deference,
+remembering that, after all, I have infinitely more to learn than I have
+to teach), the fault remains that the truth is put too keenly, too
+incisively, to be classed with practical truths.
+
+Yes, the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are for a perfect state in this
+life. We do pray for a Paradise upon earth, where either temptation
+shall no longer exist, or where sin shall have lost its power to injure
+by losing its power to allure. But will the most incessant prayer,
+individual, combined, or congregational, ever bring us to perfection?
+Alas! my friend, you would gladly persuade us so; you would lead the way
+yourself, but that the first half-dozen steps you take would have, or
+have long ago, proved to you that sin is ever present, even in the best
+and purest of men.
+
+I trust they are very few indeed who are so easily persuaded by the
+conceited self-sufficiency of the "scientific people" to cease from
+prayer under the belief that all things move on under the control of
+inflexible laws, which neither prayer nor the will of God, if God has a
+will, can change or modify. Magee[20] has a valuable note on the subject
+of the "Consistency of Prayer with the Divine Immutability," in which he
+puts this truth in a mathematical form. He says, "The relation of God to
+man + prayer is different from the relation of God to man - prayer. Yet
+God remains constant. It is man who is the better or the worse for
+prayer or no prayer."
+
+ [20] On the Atonement.
+
+It is pleasant to reflect that with the simple-minded Christian the
+belief in Christ, because he knows that Christ loved him and died for
+him, is exceedingly little moved by these so-called scientific doubts.
+The propounders of these entangling questions move in a region where he
+would feel cold and his life would be crushed out of him, and he
+declines to follow science at so great a cost, believing besides that
+science might often be better termed nescience, for he has no faith in
+such science. Instead of being presented with clear deductions, drawn
+from observation and experience, he sees but too plainly that, as each
+philosopher frames his own belief out of his inner consciousness, there
+cannot fail to come out a very large variety of beliefs, and that, if
+the religion of the Bible were exploded and became an obsolete thing,
+its place would be usurped by a motley crowd of infinitely varied creeds
+of every shape and hue, each claiming for itself, with more or less
+modesty and reserve, but with just equal rights, the supremacy over
+men's consciences. And in the meanwhile, women and children and the
+poor, and in fact all who are not altogether highly, transcendentally
+intellectual, must, for want of the requisite faculties and
+opportunities, do without any religion at all. I suppose most people can
+see this, and therefore will pay a very limited attention to the claims
+and pretensions of science-worship.
+
+I come to a sentence where once more the proclivity for satire breaks
+out for a minute: "But in modern days the first aim of all Christians is
+to place their children in circumstances where the temptations (which
+they are apt to call opportunities) may be as great and as many as
+possible; where the sight and promise of 'all these things' in Satan's
+gift may be brilliantly near." I was reading this from the MS. to a
+mother, accomplished and amiable, who of course thought in a moment of
+her own little flock of sons and daughters, all the objects of the
+tenderest care and solicitude; and she felt that she at least had not
+deserved this stroke. But the truth is that we must read this sentence
+as we read our Lord's, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth:
+I came not to send peace, but a sword" (Matt. x. 34). The sword was not
+the object of our Lord's coming, but the unhappy result through sin. He
+came to bring peace on earth, yet was He "set for the fall of many in
+Israel." The wisest and best of parents place their sons in the
+profession or position in life where temptations abound, not because
+they desire to see them bow before Satan, and become the possessors of
+"all these things" which he promises "I will give thee," but because
+there is no position in the active life of the world that is free from
+temptations; and those temptations are the strongest and most numerous
+often just where the real and undoubted advantages are the greatest and
+most numerous. Mr. Ruskin, with a strong and legitimate figure of
+speech, is simply putting an inevitable result as the work of apparent
+design.
+
+If the distinction between the glory and the power of the kingdom of God
+and the false lustre of earthly power and worldly allurements is not
+sufficiently dwelt upon in our pulpits, none will regret it more than
+the earnest preachers in whom the modern Church of England abounds. If
+it be granted, as I think it must be granted, that the highest wisdom is
+not always exercised in the choice and preparation of our subjects of
+preaching, every true-hearted and loyal Churchman must be grateful for
+the fearless candour of the writer of the letters we have been
+considering, in pointing out to us our prevailing deficiencies, even if
+he does not, which is not his province, point out how to attain
+perfection.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ LETTERS FROM CLERGY AND LAITY
+
+ (FROM THE FIRST EDITION)
+
+
+The following letters have been entrusted to me for publication in this
+work. The writers of twenty-two of them are clergymen, of whom sixteen
+are members of three Clerical Societies, all of whom have read their
+letters before the Societies to which they belong, except in the case of
+one Society, where it was impracticable. The remaining six have been
+kind enough to write in acceptance of the invitation in the
+_Contemporary Review_ for December, 1879. The remaining letters are from
+members of the laity, attracted by the same proposal. Many others have
+been received; but it would not have been possible to include them all
+in a volume of moderate size, some of them besides being of great
+length; and I was therefore, with regret, obliged to decline them.
+
+It was not originally intended that the invitation to discuss these
+questions should be extended to laymen. But several so understood it
+from the preface in the _Contemporary_, and when I came to examine the
+letters sent on this understanding, I felt a conviction that a true and
+safe light would be thrown upon the subject by their assistance; and,
+using the discretionary power allowed me by Mr. Ruskin, I thought it, on
+the whole, best to give admission to a certain number of communications
+from laymen.
+
+Besides, as they themselves are, in great measure, the subjects of the
+discussion, and, therefore, must feel a lively interest in it, it seems
+but fair that they too should have a voice in the matter. Another reason
+yet had considerable weight with me, that their letters evince a larger
+and more liberal sympathy with Mr. Ruskin himself than those of some of
+my clerical brethren, in whose letters there is but too perceptible a
+degree of irascibility, not unnatural to us, perhaps, in finding
+ourselves rather sharply lectured by a layman--the shepherds by the
+sheep. And I hoped that a more fraternal spirit would be promoted by my
+free acceptance of their ready offer.
+
+The same consenting spirit is all but universal in the notices of the
+press upon Mr. Ruskin's letters. But I do not wish to anticipate the
+judgment of "the Church and the world" upon the whole series of letters
+here presented. Notwithstanding the peculiar and sometimes rather
+bewildering effect of a variety of "cross lights," they appear to myself
+to be invested with singular interest as a faithful reflection of the
+opinions of the clergy and the laity upon some of the most stirring
+religious questions of the day.
+
+Moreover, it will, I am sure, please readers who have endeavoured in
+vain to extract some meaning out of many of the sometimes tedious and
+unintelligible essayists of the day, to observe that the discussion in
+this volume at least is carried on in language perfectly clear and
+within the reach of ordinary understandings. At any rate, I hope it will
+not be said of any of the writers who have together made up this little
+volume: "Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without
+knowledge?"
+
+Before the sheets are sent to press they will be perused by Mr. Ruskin,
+who will then use his privilege of replying, thus bringing the volume to
+a conclusion.
+
+I could not undertake to classify these letters; and have, therefore, as
+the simplest mode, arranged them in the alphabetical order of the
+writers' names.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CHARLES BIGG, D.D., _Rector of Fenny Compton_.
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin compares the clergyman with an Alpine guide, whose business
+it is simply to carry the traveller in safety over rocks and glaciers to
+the mountain top. He is not to trouble himself or his charge with
+needless refinements of doctrine. He is not to exaggerate the dignity of
+his office, or to give himself out as anything but a guide. In
+particular, he is not to assume anything of a mediatorial character. He
+is to preach the Gospel--not of Luther nor of Augustine, but of Christ;
+in plain words and short terms. He is to proclaim aloud, boldly and
+constantly, "This is the will of the Lord,"--to apply, that is, the
+morality of the Gospel, stringently and authoritatively, to the lives of
+his people. To effect this application with more power, he is to
+exercise a rigid discipline, and exclude from his congregation all who
+are not acting up to what he conceives to be the Gospel ideal. He is not
+to hamper himself with any set and formal Liturgy, which can never be
+copious or flexible enough to meet the varied needs of a number of men
+differing widely in knowledge and attainment.
+
+Every one will feel what a crowd of perplexities start up here at every
+sentence. In what sense is a clergyman like a Chamouni guide? There is a
+resemblance, no doubt, but not of a kind on which it would be possible
+to build any argument. It is not the business of the Alpine guide to
+exercise any supervision over the morals of his employers, or to ask how
+they earned the money with which he is paid. Again, what is meant by
+the Gospel of Christ not according to anybody? It is easy to reject the
+authority of St. Paul or St. John, or of Luther or Augustine, but there
+is one commentator whose influence cannot be shaken off, and that is
+ourselves. And our experience of those who have professed to preach the
+Gospel pure and simple is not reassuring. Does Mr. Ruskin mean that we
+are to burn all our theology,--even apparently the Epistles of St.
+Paul,--and to forget all Church history since the day of the
+Crucifixion? Does he mean that we are each to set up a theology--a
+Church of his own? It would be but a poor gain to most of us to exchange
+the great lamps of famous doctors for the uncertain rushlights of our
+own imaginations.
+
+Then again, what is this new and more than Genevan discipline that the
+clergyman is to enforce? He is to take more pains to get wicked rich men
+to stay out of the church than to persuade wicked poor ones to enter it.
+After putting his own interpretation upon the Gospel, he is to lay under
+an interdict all whom his own fire-new formula--for a formula he must
+still have--excludes. He is to force, by the method of Procrustes, the
+visible Church into co-extension with the invisible. No community of
+Christians has ever attempted such a task. Any zealous (surely
+over-zealous) parish priest who should so narrow the limits of his fold,
+who should exclude the "usurer" from the ordinary means of grace, for
+fear lest he should take God's name in vain by joining in the public
+prayers, would expose himself, may we not think? to the reproach of
+being less merciful than He who sends rain on the just and the unjust.
+Nor, as he looked round upon his carefully-selected congregation, could
+he easily flatter himself that he was preaching the Gospel "to every
+creature."
+
+Again, what is the will of the Lord, and what does Mr. Ruskin mean by
+proclaiming it? That He loves righteousness and hates iniquity we know.
+The difficulty is in applying this general rule in detail. What is its
+bearing upon the policy of the Government, upon any particular trade
+strike, upon the tangled web of good and evil motives which makes up the
+moral consciousness of an average shopkeeper? I conceive Mr. Ruskin to
+be thinking of preachers like Bernard, Savonarola, or Latimer, of
+denunciations like those of Isaiah, or of our Lord. He seems to mean
+that the clergyman should stand on a clear mountain summit, looking down
+over the whole field of life, discerning with the eye of a prophet every
+movement of evil on a small scale or on a large. There have been such
+teachers in whose hands science, economy, politics, seemed all to become
+branches of theology, members of one great body of Divine truth. But not
+every man's lips are thus touched with the coal from the altar. Many an
+excellent and most useful preacher would make but wild work if he took
+to denouncing social movements or the spirit of the age. A singular
+illustration of the danger that besets these sweeping moral judgments is
+to be found in Mr. Ruskin's own denunciation of usury, that is, of
+taking interest for money. Few people will agree either with the
+particular opinion that every old lady who lives harmlessly on her
+railway dividends ought to be excommunicated, or with the general
+principle implied in this opinion, that every prohibition in the Old
+Testament is still as valid as ever under social circumstances
+altogether different.
+
+People who need denouncing do not, as a rule, come to church to be
+denounced. And it would be a great error to conclude, from our Lord's
+language to the Pharisees and Sadducees, that the tone in which He
+addressed the individual sinner was harsh or scathing. The preacher must
+remember that he is a physician of souls, and the physician's touch is
+gentle. Think for a moment what worldliness is--how easy it is to say
+bitter things about it!--and then picture to yourselves a little
+tradesman with a wife and seven or eight children to keep on his scanty
+profits. What wonder if he sets too high a value on money? How difficult
+for him to understand the words which bid him take no thought for the
+morrow!
+
+There is a time, no doubt, for fierce language, but it does not often
+come. The preacher is no more exempt than other people from the golden
+rule to put himself in his neighbour's place, and try to see things with
+his neighbour's eyes.
+
+Another difficulty arises out of the manner in which Mr. Ruskin speaks
+of the relation of his Chamouni guides to dogmatic teaching. They ought
+not, he says, to be compelled to hold opinions on the subject, say, of
+the height of the Celestial Mountains, the crevasses which go down
+quickest to the pit, and other cognate points of science, differing
+from, or even contrary to, the tenets of the guides of the Church of
+France.
+
+It is difficult in the extreme to know exactly what is here meant. No
+doubt it is needless for a guide to drop a plumb-line down every
+crevasse that he has to cross. It would be great waste of time to
+lecture his travellers on the laws that regulate the motion of glaciers
+or the dip of the mountain strata. But what are the doctrines that stand
+in this relation, or this no-relation, to the spiritual life? Is it
+meant that all theology should be swept away like a dusty old cobweb?
+
+I would go myself as far as this, that the fewer and simpler the
+doctrines that a clergyman preaches, the better; that all doctrines
+should be required to pass the test of reason and conscience, which are
+also in their degrees Divine revelations, so far, at least, as this,
+that no doctrine can be admitted which is demonstrably repugnant to
+either one or the other. And in the third place, the greatest care
+should be taken to discriminate matters of faith, real axioms of
+religion, from pious opinions or venerable practices which have no vital
+connection with the Christian faith; which, to use Burke's phrase, all
+understandings do not ratify, and all hearts do not approve. A grave
+responsibility rests upon those who neglect this discrimination. It is
+also a point of the highest importance that when most doctrinal a
+clergyman should be least dogmatic; that he should remember that all
+doctrine, by the necessity of the case, is cast into an antithetical,
+more or less paradoxical shape; that he should never lose sight of the
+harmony and balance between intersecting truths, or of that unfortunate
+tendency of the human mind to seize upon and appropriate points of
+difference in their crudest and most antagonistic form, to the exclusion
+of points of agreement; that he should always do his best to show the
+reasonableness of the Christian teaching, its analogy and harmony with
+all the works of God; that where his knowledge fails, he should frankly
+confess that it does fail, and not try to eke it out by guesses, or to
+disguise its insufficiency by rhetoric.
+
+But after all these allowances it remains a fact that the clergyman is
+not a guide only, but a teacher, an ambassador. He is to teach his
+people all that he knows about God and His relation to the soul of man.
+He is to study and meditate himself, and to set forth the conclusion he
+has reached fully and fearlessly. And if he discharges this duty
+reasonably and zealously, he need not be afraid of finding that there is
+a gulf fixed between doctrine and practice. These two must go together.
+There can be no conduct deserving the name without a philosophy of
+conduct, and that philosophy is a sound divinity. Even the loftiest and
+most abstruse doctrines must have an influence upon life. It is a common
+remark that scientific truth should be pursued for its own sake, and
+that the most valuable practical results have often followed from
+investigations carried out with a single eye to the truth. It is an
+equally common remark that those teach the simplest things best whose
+range of knowledge and belief is widest. We might point to Mr. Ruskin
+himself as a striking illustration of this. What is simpler than beauty?
+what more universally apprehended? what at first sight more incapable of
+analysis? Yet as we listen to the great critic, what wonderful laws does
+he point out--what a wealth of knowledge does he bring to bear--how
+clear he makes it to us that the power of feeling (still more the power
+of creating) beauty is the hard-won fruit of labour, study, and
+devotion. So it is with life: those who would create a beautiful life
+must know the laws of spiritual beauty,--and those laws are theology.
+
+But criticism is a thankless task. It is a more gracious and, towards a
+great man, a more respectful office to note those points on which our
+debt to Mr. Ruskin is acknowledged, and our sympathy with him unalloyed.
+These letters are, in spirit at any rate, not unworthy of the man who
+has exercised a deeper and wider influence upon the morality of our time
+than any other, except perhaps Thomas Carlyle. And the great lesson of
+each of these eloquent teachers is the duty of Reality. There are many
+points in which we do not agree with them: let us be all the readier to
+acknowledge the debt that we owe. Both laymen,--like Amos, neither
+prophets nor sons of prophets,--they have done a work which, perhaps,
+under the altered circumstances of society, no professional preacher
+could have achieved. Any one who considers the earnestness and reverence
+of modern intellectual literature; the anxious desire even of the
+Agnostic to lay the foundations of his moral life as deep as possible;
+the manifold efforts, while denying all religion, yet to maintain the
+union of imagination and reason, without which there can be no loftiness
+of character, no nobility of aspiration, yet which nothing but religion
+can consecrate and fructify,--and compares all this with the sneering,
+self-satisfied flippancy of Gibbon and Voltaire, will feel how vast is
+the change for the better; and these two writers have been the chief
+instruments in bringing that change about.
+
+Let me notice briefly two points on which Mr. Ruskin insists in these
+letters with great force and beauty. The first is the love of the
+Father. No text is more familiar than that which tells us that "God is
+love." It is not indeed inconsistent with that other text which tells
+us that He is "a consuming fire." But if its meaning is fully imbibed
+and allowed to bear its natural fruit, it must result in the abandonment
+of those forensic views of our blessed Lord's atonement, which all the
+subtlety of Canon Mozley cannot bring into harmony with the dictates of
+our consciences. If the Father is love, there can be no division, no
+antithesis between the Father and the Son. If He is love, then the idea
+of sacrifice, which is of the essence of love, must enter into our
+conception of the Father also. I say no more about this, because any one
+who chooses to do so may find the Fatherhood of God, and all that it
+implies, treated of with great fulness and a marvellous depth of
+spiritual insight in the letters of Erskine of Linlathen.
+
+It can hardly be doubted that the kind of language which Protestants of
+a certain class have been, and still are, in the habit of using, about
+the "Scheme of Redemption," constitutes a most serious stumbling-block
+in the way of many an earnest spirit. There are few preachers probably,
+and few congregations now,--in the Establishment at any rate,--who
+would not revolt against the hideous calmness with which Jonathan
+Edwards contemplates the "little spiders" dropping off into the flames.
+But a great deal of mischief remains to be undone. Those who are
+acquainted with the biographies of Shelley, of James and of John Stuart
+Mill, know well what effect the fierce doctrines of Calvinism have
+produced upon minds which for the issues of morality and, surely, even
+of religion, were "finely touched." And who can tell what horror and
+indignation have been wrought in some minds, what agonies of despair in
+others, who, when at last the blessed work of repentance began to stir
+within them, and they turned their eyes for comfort to the cross, were
+met by the terrible warning that none but the select few can call God
+their Father, and that in all probability their own eternal tortures
+were decreed before ever they entered the world?
+
+The other point to which I must briefly advert is Mr. Ruskin's protest
+against the use of words which imply--which leave the least possibility
+of hoping for--a mechanical absolution, a pardon of sins that have not
+been abandoned. I do not indeed think that the reproach of using such
+language falls upon those who are fond of the title of priests alone,
+for the doctrines of Calvinism are far more liable to abuse. Nor do I
+think that any preaching of our clergy on this subject can be said to
+have "turned our cities into loathsome centres of fornication and
+covetousness." But here, if anywhere, we ought never to forget the
+danger of even seeming to set Theology against Reason and Conscience, of
+allowing the least pretext for thinking that a mere intellectual assent
+to abstract truths on the one hand, a mere acceptance of ecclesiastical
+ordinances on the other, can wipe away sins; or that a heart unpurified
+by charity and obedience, could be at rest even in the kingdom of
+heaven.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CANON COOPER, _Vicar of Grange-over-Sands_.
+
+
+Thank God, all good men are broader and better than their creed,--better
+and broader, I mean, than those parts of their creed which they insist
+upon most, because they distinguish them from other people. (These
+distinguishing points are always of the least importance, in my
+opinion.) And with my experience of sermons for nearly forty years (for
+I was very early "called upon to hear sermons"), I am not conscious of
+such universal omissions on the part of the "priests" of the Church of
+England as Mr. Ruskin affirms. The universality of the _love_ of God the
+_Father_, embracing even the "_wicked rich_" as well as the "wicked
+poor," is largely dwelt upon by all "schools."
+
+The kingdom of God _in this present sinful world_ is preached and is
+laboured for. In the present, however, it is more correctly described as
+the _kingdom of Christ_. When "the end comes," "He shall deliver up the
+kingdom to God, _even the Father_" (1 Cor. xv. 24, and _seqq._) As for
+denouncing the sins of the rich, this is largely done, and especially by
+"lively young ecclesiastics" in great towns. And as to preaching
+forgiveness without amendment, no man of common sense can do that; but
+Mr. Ruskin may say that common sense is rare among the clergy; and some
+may be afraid to preach morality, because of an old-fashioned
+superstition that _morality_ is opposed to the _Gospel_. However, I do
+not hear much of such preaching. As for the duty of every man to do
+something of the work of the world for his daily bread, that is largely
+taught; and I believe that the kingdom of God is coming in that respect.
+A great deal of the drudgery of the world is done by big men now. Also I
+think that the sinfulness of _omission_ is much insisted on by the
+clergy, as it is abundantly noticed in the Prayer Book, in accordance
+with the clear teaching of Christ. And the same may be said upon the
+_personal guilt_ of sin. A good clergyman never allows his people to
+shelter themselves _in a crowd_.
+
+I do not feel the force of the taunt about our saying every week, "There
+is no health in us," because the most "healthy" Christian finds out
+always fresh failings as his conscience grows more healthy (not morbidly
+sensitive), and he is always ready to join in the general confession to
+his dying day.
+
+There is some value in the remark about Christian parents putting their
+children into situations where they will be tempted to worship the
+devil in order to win the kingdom of the world; but here, as elsewhere,
+the exaggeration, for the sake of being forcible, is too marked.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ HENRY M. FLETCHER.
+
+
+"Yes," I should say, "it is possible to put the Gospel of Christ into
+such plain words and short terms as that a plain man may understand it,
+and plain men do understand it. And it is not left to be gathered out of
+(any of) the Thirty-nine Articles, which are meant not for simple but
+for clerkly people."
+
+You seem to have felt it startling that Mr. Ruskin should ask for a
+simple and comprehensible statement of the Christian Gospel--at least
+Mr. Ruskin represents the case so. What Christ's ministers are bidden to
+go into all the world and preach is--the good news that God has
+reconciled the world unto Himself in Jesus Christ His Son; and that
+whosoever will accept this Jesus as His Lord and Saviour shall have
+eternal life through Him. You could not, I think, arrive at a
+definition of what the Gospel of Christ is by explaining the terms of
+the Lord's Prayer.
+
+You must tell first about _Jesus_, our Lord, and what He has done,
+before child or man can have any proper notion of "the Gospel." The
+Gospel is a message from "Our Father which is in Heaven," of His love,
+and of what His love--the love of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost--has
+devised and executed for the redemption and glorification (through
+sanctification) of His rebellious children.
+
+There can be small objection taken to Mr. Ruskin's proposal to make the
+Lord's Prayer "a foundation of Gospel teaching, as containing what all
+Christians are agreed upon as first to be taught," if the "Gospel
+teaching" is understood to be "teaching the truth to _Christians_." But
+"the Gospel teaching or preaching," which is spoken of by Mr. Ruskin, is
+"Gospel preaching" to the world not yet Christian, either Jewish or
+heathen; and the Lord's Prayer cannot properly be taken as a foundation
+of Gospel teaching to it. It must be told first of Jesus and His work,
+and must have owned Him "Lord," before it can rightly be taught from
+_His_ prayer. This prayer can have no _authority_ but to those who have
+become His disciples. Those who are already His disciples learn
+naturally from Him their relation and their duty to His Father and their
+Father. St. Paul, in preaching to the Athenians, dwells not on the
+Fatherhood _of God_, but on the need of repentance as a preparation for
+the judgment which awaits all. "Jesus and the Resurrection" was what
+they heard of first from this model preacher.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ A. T. DAVIDSON.
+
+
+MY DEAR SIR,--Permit me to say one thing with regard to the
+correspondence which has passed between Mr. Ruskin and yourself.
+
+Profitable as it is to listen to Mr. Ruskin, the student of Mr.
+Maurice's writings will merely find in these remarkable letters an
+additional plea on behalf of those truths for which Mr. Maurice so
+bravely and so passionately contended. It is most refreshing to find two
+such teachers in accord; and probably there will be many who will learn
+from Mr. Ruskin what they never would have learnt, or even sought for,
+from Mr. Maurice. It is, of course, for the truth, and not for his
+individual statement of it, that Mr. Ruskin, even as Mr. Maurice did,
+contends. It will, I am sure, be a matter of small moment to him so long
+as the truth be sought for, whether it be arrived at by means of these
+letters, or by means of Mr. Maurice's books on "The Lord's Prayer," "The
+Prayer Book," and "The Commandments."
+
+Believe me, my dear Sir, to be yours faithfully.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ EDWARD GEOGHEGAN.
+
+
+ BARDSEA VICARAGE, ULVERSTON.
+
+"Open rebuke is better than secret love. Faithful are the wounds of a
+friend. Let the righteous smite me, it shall be a kindness: and let him
+reprove me, it shall be an excellent oil, which shall not break my
+head."
+
+It is in the spirit which is expressed in these words that I desire to
+offer the following notes on Mr. Ruskin's Letters. Among the charges
+which he brings against the clergy are the following:--
+
+That we have no clear idea of our calling, or of the Gospel of Christ
+(Letters III. and IV.)
+
+That we profane the name of God in the pulpit (Letter VI.)
+
+That we teach that every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the
+Lord, and He delighteth in them (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we hold our office to be that, not of showing men how to do their
+Father's will on earth, but how to get to heaven without doing any of it
+either here or there (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we neither profess to understand what the will of the Lord is, nor
+to teach anybody else to do it (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we pretend to absolve the sinner from his punishment, instead of
+purging him from his sin (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we patronize and encourage all the iniquity of the world by
+steadily preaching away the penalties of it (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we gather, each into himself, the curious dual power and
+Janus-faced majesty in mischief of the prophet that prophesies falsely,
+and the priest that bears rule by his means (Letter VIII.)
+
+That we do not exercise discipline by keeping wicked people out of
+church (Letter VI.)
+
+That we do not require each member of our flocks to tell us what they do
+to earn their dinners (Letter IX.)
+
+That we encourage people in hypocrisy, by inviting them to the
+authorized mockery of a confession of sin (Letter X.)
+
+I cannot examine the evidence which Mr. Ruskin possesses in support of
+these charges, as he has not produced it in these Letters. Neither can I
+attempt to refute the accusations. To prove a negative is always
+difficult; it becomes an impossible task when the indictment is laid not
+against any individuals mentioned by name, but against a whole order. I
+will only observe, that even if all these charges be true, the people of
+England are not in such evil case as Mr. Ruskin fancies. The laity of
+England possess the inestimable advantage of not being dependent on the
+sermons of their clergy for either doctrine, or correction, or
+instruction in righteousness. Even though a clergyman should never
+utter certain doctrines of Christ from the pulpit, or reprove certain
+sins, he is obliged to do so at the font, at the lectern, and at the
+altar. Although from the pulpits of the fifty hundreds of clergy whom
+Mr. Ruskin heard, he never heard so much as _one_ clergyman heartily
+proclaiming that no covetous person, which is an idolater, hath any
+inheritance in the kingdom of God, he must have often heard this
+proclamation from the altar, in the epistle for the third Sunday in
+Lent, and from the lectern whenever the fifth chapter of the Epistle to
+the Ephesians is read for the lesson.
+
+Again, if any clergyman teaches from the pulpit that for the redemption
+of the world people ought to be thankful, not to the Father, but to the
+Son (Letter V.), he is obliged to publicly contradict his own teaching
+as often as he says the General Thanksgiving, and the collects in the
+Book of Common Prayer.
+
+Again, if any clergyman teaches from the pulpit that any one who does
+evil is good in the sight of the Lord, or that there is any other
+salvation except a salvation from sin, he is obliged to publicly
+contradict that teaching by everything which he says in the church out
+of the pulpit.
+
+Again, if any clergyman preaches away the penalties of sin (Letter
+VIII.), he is obliged to publicly contradict his preaching every Ash
+Wednesday, when he reads the general sentences of God's cursing against
+impenitent sinners.
+
+Mr. Ruskin asks (Letter III.), "Can this Gospel of Christ be put into
+such plain words and short terms as that a plain man may understand it?"
+I answer that the English Church has tried to do this in the Catechism,
+in which every baptized child is taught in very simple and plain words
+the gospel, or good news, that God the Father has, in His Son Jesus
+Christ, adopted him or her into His family, and therein offers him or
+her the continual help of the Holy Ghost.
+
+Mr. Ruskin complains that the clergy do not teach the people the meaning
+of the Lord's Prayer (Letter VI.) He must assume that the clergy neglect
+to teach children the Church Catechism, in which is an answer to the
+question, "What desirest thou of God in this prayer?" It is an answer
+which would probably satisfy Mr. Ruskin. He would see that "Hallowed be
+Thy name" does not merely mean that people ought to abstain from bad
+language. And in the explanation of the third commandment, he would see
+that something more is forbidden than letting out a round oath (Letter
+VI.)
+
+Mr. Ruskin complains that the clergy do not prevent the entrance among
+their congregations of persons leading openly wicked lives (Letter VI.)
+Before this can be charged on the clergy as a sin, he should show that
+they have power and authority to do this. In the service for Ash
+Wednesday he will find that the clergy express their desire for a
+restoration of the godly discipline of the primitive Church, which Mr.
+Ruskin also desires. But he ought to know that such restoration must be
+the work not of the clergy only, but of the whole body of the faithful.
+
+Mr. Ruskin insinuates that the clergy have no clear idea of their
+calling (Letter III.) If this be so, it is certainly not the fault of
+the Church, seeing that the nature of the calling of a clergyman is
+plainly set forth in the Offices for the Ordering of Bishops, Priests,
+and Deacons. But if one may form an opinion from many published sermons
+by English clergymen of various schools of thought, and from their
+speeches in Church Congresses and elsewhere, and from their pastoral
+work as parish priests, I should be inclined to think that they are not
+quite so ignorant of the nature of their calling and of the Gospel of
+Christ as Mr. Ruskin supposes them to be, and that of some of the sins,
+negligences, and ignorances which, in these Letters, he lays to their
+charge, they may plead not guilty, or at least not proven by Mr. Ruskin.
+
+
+
+
+ BARDSEA, ULVERSTON,
+ _November 3rd, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I thank you for your letter, which I received this
+morning. Second thoughts are not always the best. Your own first thought
+about the motto which I prefixed to my notes was right; your second
+thought was wrong. It never occurred to me that anyone could possibly
+suppose that that motto was by me intended to be applied to myself,
+inasmuch as in these notes there is no "wound" inflicted on Mr. Ruskin,
+or even any "rebuke." On the contrary, I assume that he has evidence in
+support of his charges, although he has not produced it. The "rebuke" to
+which I alluded was _Mr. Ruskin's_ rebuke. _He_ is the "friend" whose
+wounds are faithful, and whose smitings are a kindness. For I have not
+the least doubt of his good-will towards the clergy, or of his earnest
+desire to see them all performing their sacred duties with zeal and
+knowledge. And it was as my acknowledgment of this that I prefixed the
+motto. With you I firmly believe that the standard which he takes is
+"lofty and Christian," and that it is one towards which we ought all of
+us to aim. The object of my notes was to show that the laity of England
+have, in the authorized teaching of the Church, a sufficient safeguard
+against any erroneous teaching which they may possibly hear from the
+pulpit or in the private ministrations of the clergy, and also a
+supplement to any defective teaching.
+
+ Very truly yours,
+ EDWARD GEOGHEGAN.
+
+
+
+
+ _From_ JOSEPH GILBURT, Esq.
+
+
+ _Christmas Day_, 1879.
+
+The words "Thy will be done" are generally coupled with resignation, and
+very often with patience under chastisement. It is always to us a
+sad-coloured sentence, and a sentimental illuminator of the Lord's
+Prayer would in all probability make it so. Now, if we think for a
+moment what the state of things would be if the will of the Lord were
+done, we shall see it should be the brightest sentence we could
+conceive. God's will is our weal. Aspiration, not resignation, is the
+characteristic of its doing. There would certainly be no death,--that is
+decidedly contrary to His will; and by-and-by, when His will is done,
+there will be none. For the present, while His will is not yet done, we
+have the sure and certain hope that death will be--nay, is--conquered by
+anticipation.
+
+If His will were done, all beautiful things would flourish, and all
+minds would answeringly rejoice in them.
+
+Our men of the piercing eye--Turners, Hunts, Ruskins, etc.--show us,
+till we almost worship the state of things in cloud and mountain, river
+and sea, in hedgerow and wayside, even in cathedral and campanile, where
+God's will is done, and we are enchanted with their beauty. It is God's
+will that stones should be laid truly and carven well, and aptly
+described. And our men of the probe and the lens, the scientific openers
+of nature's secrets, are daily demonstrating new beauties in which the
+will of the Lord is done in the formation of bodies and working of
+forces. It is mere truism to add to this that the will of the Lord being
+done, none of the ills that are all of them indirectly or directly the
+result of not doing it could occur, and resignation would have no scope
+for exercise. There was One who always did it, and He for three years
+made sundry parts of Palestine a heaven,--with what results a many
+quondam poor folk testified. This leads me to say that I like to look
+upon the word heaven as a participle instead of a noun, as the state of
+being heaved or raised, rather than a place: and for this reason. The
+experience of every one of us suffices to prove that we are never so
+_heaven_, or raised in true happiness, moral dignity, and worth, as
+when we are in the company of one greater, wiser, or better than
+ourselves. Those who lead a humdrum life among mean persons, can testify
+what a heaven it is to be transplanted for ever so short a time to the
+company of a great and good man. Now the culminating, indeed
+all-absorbing, attraction of the heaven we all look to, is the presence
+and the companionship of the greatest and best; and the experience of
+ourselves tallies with the promise of St. John that it will have the
+effect of making us "like Him," when "we shall see Him as He is." Surely
+being _heaven_, or raised like that, is superior to any Mahomet's
+paradise that we can invent or distil out of the poetical parts of the
+Scriptures.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ ARCHER GURNEY.
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin's view as to the duty of basing all upon the Father's love is
+essentially sound and orthodox; and he is also right in bidding all men
+lead self-denying lives,--in this sense, that they should give up time
+and labour to the endeavour to help their brethren; but he fails
+utterly, hopelessly, to realize the Incarnation and its glorious
+consequences, how all human life and love,--how art, science, knowledge,
+enjoyment, are sanctified by God's becoming man; sharing this human life
+of ours,--not to trample upon it as an unholy thing, but to consecrate
+it to God's service. Such is our call. We must enjoy the beautiful to
+vindicate enjoyment. We do not please God by casting all His choicest
+gifts away. To give all we have to feed the poor is the way to make men
+poor, and is false charity. Use rather the mammon of this world to God's
+honour and glory, and when ye fail, the good works that you have done
+shall plead for your entrance into everlasting habitations; for the way
+to clothe the naked and feed the hungry, permanently, is to teach men
+and women to help themselves, and to find employment and reward for the
+exercise of their powers and energies.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ J. H. A. GIBSON, _Brighton_.
+
+
+To Mr. Ruskin, then, asking us to define ourselves as a body, I reply,
+We are presbyters and deacons, deriving our authority from the
+episcopate, who themselves form links in that spiritual chain which
+binds both ourselves and them, by perpetual succession, in one communion
+and fellowship, with the Apostles, and to whom has been committed the
+office of consecrating and sending forth labourers to work in the Lord's
+vineyard.
+
+But Mr. Ruskin proceeds, "And our business as such." Our business as
+such! Well, if we have in any satisfactory manner proved our first
+point--_that_ is, the authority with which we act--we may fairly say to
+Mr. Ruskin, "Do you put this question, 'What is your business?' to your
+lawyer or doctor?" Does he ask the same question of the clergy of any
+other portion of the Catholic Church? We shall not wish to insult Mr.
+Ruskin by attempting to explain to him the duties of the priesthood,
+with which, doubtless, he is well acquainted.
+
+But he asks, "Do we look upon ourselves as attached to any particular
+State, and bound to the promulgation of any particular tenets?" We are
+undoubtedly attached to the particular sphere to the which we are sent
+by those whose office is to provide the various parts of God's vineyard
+with labourers. The Anglican Church is the legitimate representative of
+the Catholic Church of Christ in England; and we, as clergy of this
+Church, minister for the most part to our countrymen at home, and only
+in other countries as the necessities of our colonists and others may
+require. And, as subscribers to the Prayer Book and priests of the
+Church of England, we are certainly bound to teach faithfully and
+honestly her doctrines, neither adding to them nor taking away from them
+according to our own individual idiosyncrasies.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CANON GRAY.
+
+
+ WOLSINGHAM, _October 13th, 1879_.
+
+MY DEAR PENRHYN,--Will you please to thank Mr. Malleson on my behalf for
+the Letters on the Lord's Prayer? I have ever admired Ruskin, and learn
+much even when I most differ from him. But if I had the good fortune to
+be with you to-morrow, I fear that I should constantly be demurring to
+his teaching,--_e.g._ (Letter III.) his supposition that the Thirty-nine
+Articles were meant to include a summary of the Gospel; (Letter V.) his
+belief that there is need now to warn men against being thankful not to
+the Father but only to the Son,--a remnant of the teaching of his youth;
+(p. 20) his hard way of speaking as to the Son of Man, Whose human soul,
+as that of perfect man, received its knowledge in steps according to His
+own will as perfect God; (Letter VII.) his confused distinction between
+the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Christ (see Eph. v. 5 in the
+Greek, and remember "_tradendo tenet_" on 1 Cor. xv. 24); his belief
+that because no one knoweth the hour of Christ's coming, it cannot be
+hastened by prayer; (Letter VIII.) his seeming identification of
+claiming interest from a poor man who is in need and necessity, and from
+a railway company who borrow money to make more,--speaking, as far as I
+can see, of money as if it had no market value like other things;
+(Letter X.) the belief that we clergy are not awake to the guilt of sins
+of omission; (Letter X.) the inability to see that the nearer and nearer
+by God's grace we come, in answer to prayer, to purity and holiness, the
+more we _realize_ our distance from them; and that his objection to our
+Liturgy might be adapted into one against the Lord's Prayer, in which we
+pray daily for forgiveness of sins, and deliverance from evil, showing
+that we never shall be so delivered as no longer to need forgiveness;
+(Letter XI.) the supposition that any one state of life is necessarily
+more full of temptations than another, as though the fruit of a tree
+were not to Eve what the glory of the world was to the Son of Man, at
+least in the eye of the Tempter.
+
+I am ashamed to jot down thus obscurely the points on which I should
+have liked to speak, and I know that our brethren can fully deal with
+them. On the other hand (Letter VIII.) there is much to move us, and
+lead to searchings of heart. As to the timidity and coldness with which
+the Church is attacking the crying sins of our day, one often feels how
+we need some among us to speak as the prophets did to the men of their
+generation, and we may be thankful to have our shortcomings brought home
+to us by words like Ruskin's.
+
+I wish I were not writing so hurriedly.
+
+Remember me most affectionately to all my old and true friends who are
+with you to-morrow.
+
+
+[NOTE.--_March 12th, 1880_:--
+
+Mr. Malleson has kindly brought this letter of mine again before me.
+Hasty and concise as it was, I have no wish to expand it, as Mr.
+Ruskin's Letters are now _publici juris_, and in the hands of many a
+critic, who will rejoice to deal with them according to his wisdom. I
+should be thankful, however, for leave to add a few words on one point.
+I cannot help having misgivings as to whether I was right in demurring
+without hesitation to "the supposition that one state of life is
+necessarily more free from temptations than another," for I well know
+that in favour of such a supposition there is a strong _consensus_ of
+just men. I am, however, one of those who believe that the shorter
+Beatitude, "Blessed be ye poor," (Luke vi. 20) is explained by the
+longer, "Blessed are the poor in spirit." I see, also, that the
+difficulty with which "they that have riches" enter the kingdom of God
+is reasserted with a qualification in the very next verse, which speaks
+of those "who trust in riches" (St. Mark x. 23, 24). "Who then can be
+saved?" asked the disciples, who, poor men indeed themselves, first
+heard of this difficulty, instinctively perceiving, it may be, that it
+has its root in temptations from which in one shape or other no one is
+free. I read that "the cares of this world," as well as "the
+deceitfulness of riches," choke the Word; and I am sure that into the
+number of those "who will be rich," or "who are wishing to be rich," and
+so "fall into temptation," a poor man may but too easily find his way. I
+like to remember that when "the beggar died," he was carried into the
+bosom of one who had been "very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold;"
+and I think that very deep and far-stretching may be the meaning of the
+words of the wise man, "The rich and poor meet together, and the Lord is
+the Maker of them all."]
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ H. N. GRIMLEY, _Norton Rectory, Bury St. Edmunds_.
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin's Letters have already been closely scrutinized. What have
+seemed to be blemishes in them have been commented on. They have been
+spoken of as somewhat random utterances--as utterances such as are
+pardonable in a layman, but would be inexcusable in a clergyman who
+should endeavour to instruct his brethren. It has been said of them that
+they manifest a want of knowledge of teaching constantly being given
+from Church of England pulpits. It would be quite possible for the
+present paper to be devoted to a continuation of the like free criticism
+of the Letters. I might ask, for instance, whether Mr. Ruskin, after (in
+Letter V.) speaking with condemnation of a plan of salvation which sets
+forth the Divine Son as appeasing the wrath of the Father in heaven,
+does not himself give expression to words, as to the love of the Father,
+which almost imply that in his estimation the Divine mind is not in
+unity in itself? I might further ask for Mr. Ruskin to put more
+definiteness into his remarks on usury, and to particularize the
+special forms of that condemnable practice which the clergy should
+boldly denounce. The few hints which he throws out on this subject show
+that to his own thoughts there is present an exalted socialism. He
+himself in previous writings, while shadowing forth a social system
+based on unselfishness, has carefully deprecated any revolutionary
+attempt to hasten the establishment of such a system, and would prefer
+that it should be waited for while it quietly and with orderliness
+evolves itself out of the present imperfect order of things. Is it not
+so evolving itself? Does not the co-operative movement, now steadily
+advancing, spring out of the recognition of the fact that mutual welfare
+is a far more excellent thing to be attained than the enrichment of the
+few at the expense of the many? And if, with regard to the land
+question, any readjustment of relations is made, will it not be made in
+the light of the same beneficent principle? If, however, the clergy were
+to give heed to Mr. Ruskin's words, and at once proceed to the
+indiscriminate excommunication of usurers, would they not be initiating
+a social revolution, altogether different from that orderly upgrowth of
+a better state of things which has commended itself aforetime to Mr.
+Ruskin himself? My own impression is that I shall be giving voice to a
+wish that will spring up wherever Mr. Ruskin's Letters may be read, if I
+say that a clearer, more definite utterance on the usury question would
+be welcomed. The clergy everywhere would receive with thankfulness any
+hints as to how they might hasten the coming of the day when the Church
+of Christ will no longer embrace within her borders the few, with a
+useless excess of wealth, and around them the unhappy many, hopelessly,
+squalidly destitute; along, too, with a vast number of toiling teachers,
+clergy, artists, and literary workers, living mostly on the verge of
+pennilessness--men of whose existence Mr. Ruskin has, in earlier
+writings, expressed himself as keenly and sympathetically conscious.
+
+But I will not linger on such parts of Mr. Ruskin's Letters as may seem
+to display inconsistency, or to need more precision of language before
+they can be practically useful. I will proceed to speak of those for
+which, as it seems to me, the clergy may unhesitatingly be very
+grateful to Mr. Ruskin for laying them before them.
+
+And first, I think we cannot be other than thankful to Mr. Ruskin for
+sounding at the outset a note of catholicity. He asks the clergy of the
+English Church (let me say he asks us,--he asks you and me), whether we
+look upon ourselves as the clergy of a mere insular Church, or as the
+clergy of the Church Universal. Is the teaching we are continually
+giving utterance to as to the conduct of life in harmony with, or
+different from, the teaching of the Christian Churches on the Continent
+of Europe? Mr. Ruskin's tone, in asking these questions, is such as
+implies that it would be no satisfaction to him to hear from us that we
+rejoice in considering ourselves as severed from the clergy of the
+Christian Church abroad. Indeed, he goes on to assume that we, with one
+consenting voice, admit our fellowship with the rest of
+Christendom--that we recognize as our brothers the clergy of the Church
+of France, and of the Church of Italy, and of the Church everywhere.
+
+Mr. Ruskin thus does not lend the support of his name to any useless
+Protestantism. There are senses in which the whole Christian Church must
+ever be a Protestant Church, and in which even individual members may
+from time to time raise protesting voices. The Church must ever lift up
+her protest against all influences that work in the world for
+evil--against whatsoever tends to overthrow the Christian ideals of
+individual, family, social, national, and international life. She must
+protest against all hindrances, even though they may spring up within
+her own borders, which tend to prevent her from putting any beneficent
+impress upon human handiwork and upon manifestations of human genius.
+She must protest against the very Protestantism in her midst which has
+served to paganize art and to demoralize the drama, by banishing both to
+an outer region of darkness which Gospel rays cannot be expected to
+illumine. She must protest vigorously against the mischievous
+Protestantism which impoverishes the intellect and chills the
+affections, by causing men to devote the whole energies of their lives
+to protesting against systems of thought with which they are very
+imperfectly acquainted, and to maintaining an attitude of perpetual
+suspicion as to others' aims and motives. Under the influence of such
+Protestantism as this, many have been possessed with the assurance that
+a vast number of the clergy of Christendom live for no other end than to
+conspire against freedom, to disseminate falsities, and to work ruin
+amongst human souls. This Protestantism is fast ceasing to have any
+power amongst us; still, as it is not quite extinct, it is comforting to
+find that Mr. Ruskin does not attribute it to the main body of those
+whom he addresses.
+
+To me it seems that an habitual protesting attitude on the part of those
+who are called upon to be the teachers of the Church implies that they
+have not themselves properly entered the temple of Christian truth. He
+to whom Christian doctrine has revealed itself in all its wondrous
+harmony cannot do other than devote himself to unfolding to others what
+is ever present to his own mind, so that he may aid in building up their
+thoughts consistently and symmetrically, and thus help to establish them
+firmly in the Christian faith.
+
+We may, then, it seems to me, express our thankfulness that Mr. Ruskin
+has spoken, though ever so briefly, a word of encouragement to the
+clergy of the English Church amongst whom the thought of a future of
+reunion for Christendom has been welcomed. Mr. Ruskin is familiar with
+the practical working of the Christian Church in Italy and elsewhere on
+the Continent, and seeing, as he has seen, that her influence is exerted
+towards securing an orderly and healthy state of social life, he does
+not give circulation to the indiscriminate calumnies which were once
+wont to be uttered, and which were alike at variance with the truth and
+provocative of a mischievous severance of Christians from one another.
+
+But we must, I think, be more especially grateful to Mr. Ruskin for his
+calling widespread attention to the great Christian doctrine of the
+Fatherhood of God. There is especial need for this being uplifted before
+the thoughts of men at the present day, and it is being so uplifted. The
+more it is upheld, the more fully will it be discerned. It cannot be
+said that the doctrine is not accepted within the English Church. Still,
+it has not yet been received in all its fulness. Amongst the
+separatists outside the borders of our Church, the doctrine that God is
+the Father of all humanity, and the loving Father too, is rejected in
+two extreme ways. The set of "believers" who adopt the one extreme view
+consider that the Lord's Prayer--so luminous, as Mr. Ruskin reminds us,
+with the thought of God's fatherly love--should be used only by the
+elect, such as themselves, and that all others have no right to address
+God as their Father. The other set of so-called "believers" considers
+with a deplorable Pharisaism that they have arrived at such a stage of
+perfection as to be beyond the need for using words which require them
+to ask every day for forgiveness of their trespasses. Why should they
+ask for such, they say, when their trespasses are non-existent? If they
+are children of the Father they are not so in the same sense as those
+who conscientiously use the prayer addressed to the Father in heaven. I
+regret that Mr. Ruskin's facile pen has betrayed him into writing some
+words with reference to our Liturgy which bring him momentarily into
+sympathy with these self-righteous ones who have no need to confess
+that they want more health of soul.
+
+But the doctrine of the loving Fatherhood of God, as revealed to us in
+Christ, is one that is unfolding itself more and more clearly to the
+Christian world. If it has unfolded itself to us we may aid in its
+increased discernment. It is one that involves the acceptance of the
+thought that all human life and every sphere of human endeavour are
+under Divine patronage. God is in every way our Father. All human
+excellences whatsoever exist in their fulness and perfection in Him. As
+they are manifested in us and in our brothers and sisters around us,
+they are Divine excellences becoming incarnate on the realm of humanity.
+
+Childhood, for instance, as it manifests its sweetness and winsomeness
+in Christian homes, is an outcome of the eternal childhood which dwells
+in God, and which was manifested supremely to the world in the life of
+the Divine Child at Bethlehem and Nazareth.
+
+So that the doctrine of the loving Fatherhood of God has sheltering
+beneath it the thought of the divineness of childhood. Clustering with
+it are many kindred thoughts. There is the divineness of youth, the
+frankness of Christian boyhood, the tender grace of Christian
+girlhood,--these are manifestations of the eternal youth abiding in the
+Divine Lord of humanity.
+
+I might speak to you in like manner of the divineness of manhood and of
+womanhood, and of the divineness of old age. All womanly excellences, as
+well as all manly virtues, reside in the Divine One. I might speak to
+you of the divineness of wedded life, the divineness of Christian
+fatherliness and motherliness. The divineness of the student's life and
+of the teacher's life might also be dwelt upon. The divineness of the
+ministry of reconciliation, in which ministry all may take part who help
+others to separate themselves from sin and selfishness and to enter into
+union with God and His life of love,--this I present to you as a
+fruitful thought. The divineness of all efforts tending towards the
+solace and comforting of suffering human souls,--that too is one of the
+beneficent thoughts involved in the great Christian truth that God is
+the Father of humanity.
+
+But the same great truth leads us to the discernment of other useful
+thoughts. I might speak of them as connected with the divineness of all
+toil which has for its object the increase of human knowledge, the
+gathering together of the stored-up lessons of the past, the beautifying
+of the daily life, the refining and spiritualizing of the daily thoughts
+of the great brotherhood and sisterhood. It would thus be quite
+justifiable to speak of the divineness of scientific toil, inasmuch as
+that has for its aim the unfolding of the thoughts of God, of which all
+appearances of the material world are the outcome and manifestation.
+Thus too I might speak of the divineness of the work of those who enable
+us to see the results of the Divine guidance bestowed on the world in
+the ages past. I might speak of the divineness of the work of the artist
+who devotes himself to acquiring skill in subtly entangling in the
+colours he puts on canvas the sentiment underlying the landscape he
+reverently looks at, which to him is a manifestation of a heaven of
+beauty unseen by heedless eyes. I might also speak of the divineness of
+the labours of the Christian poet, who presents to the world truth in
+its feminine and most winning aspects.
+
+When I should have spoken of all these things they could all be summed
+up into one phrase--the divineness of Humanity. And this is what I have
+faintly attempted to show necessarily springs up for recognition as the
+doctrine of the Fatherhood of God presents itself to us in all its
+impressiveness.
+
+I must hasten to a close. I have said that Mr. Ruskin in what he asks us
+with reference to our relation to the Church in other countries sounds a
+note of catholicity. In what I have myself said as to Protestantism I
+have urged nothing inconsistent with a thorough loyalty to the principle
+of Christian individualism. But individualism in utter revolt against
+authority leads only to confusion and to a multiplicity of tyrannies.
+Individualism thrives best under the protection of a generous
+all-embracing authority. Individualism before taking up the attitude of
+revolt should consider that it, by brave patience and a reverent
+submissiveness to all higher influences around it, may contribute
+beneficently to the authority of the future, and increase the
+generousness and catholicity of its sway.
+
+I will further remark that Mr. Ruskin's words as to the Fatherhood of
+God are also a catholic utterance. For the Fatherhood of God when
+pondered upon helps us to see that no sphere of human effort is beyond
+His control; that His house is one of many mansions of thought and
+affection and loving toil; that His heavenly kingdom is one including
+all domains on which human energies can be directed, over which human
+thoughts can roam, on which human love can lavish itself.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ CANON E. H. M'NEILE, _Liverpool_.
+
+
+What is the exact question asked in Letter II.?
+
+Is it whether the clergy are or are not teachers of universal science?
+
+If so, we answer, Yes, we are teachers of the science most universal of
+all, namely, the knowledge of God, which is eternal life: and of the way
+to attain it, which is holiness; and the principles of this science,
+which are universal, are not, as in other sciences, discovered by human
+research, but are revealed by God.
+
+Does the question imply that there are points of science on which it is
+of no consequence what opinions a teacher holds? And if so, does it
+further mean that all matters of doctrine, such as are defined in the
+Thirty-nine Articles, are of this nature?
+
+If so, I answer that it is only the theories or speculations of
+scientific investigators about which variety of opinion is immaterial,
+not the essential principles of the science; and that we cannot exclude
+all questions of doctrine from among those principles. I do not know
+what is meant by holding different opinions on points of science. About
+the facts of science there can be no difference of opinion; but there
+may be about the bearings, and the inferences to be drawn from them.
+
+
+LETTER III
+
+Here is a definite question. My answer is, Yes, but we do not refer to
+the Thirty-nine Articles for a statement of the Gospel, but rather to
+the Apostles' Creed, which contains the simplest summary of the facts on
+which the Gospel rests. (See 1 Cor. xv. 1, etc.)
+
+
+LETTER IV
+
+Here I answer, No. The Lord's Prayer was not intended to be a statement
+of the Gospel, but the language of those who have accepted it. No doubt
+the terms of the prayer may be so explained as to bring in a definition
+of the Gospel, working backwards; but a complete explanation would be
+longer than the Thirty-nine Articles. There seems to be a serious
+confusion of thought here between the offer of salvation to sinners
+estranged from God, and the utterance towards God of His reconciled
+children.
+
+
+LETTER V
+
+The Lord's Prayer is elementary teaching for Christians, but it is not
+the first thing to be taught to those outside the family of God. The
+truth that we have a Father in heaven is a fundamental part of the
+Gospel. It is assumed in the Lord's Prayer; and so is the further truth
+that our Father of His tender love towards us has given His Son to die
+for us, that we may be delivered from the "consuming fire" which sin,
+not God, has kindled; and thus we have indeed a blessed scheme of pardon
+for which we are to be thankful to _both_ the Father and the Son. This
+makes _all_ the clauses of the apostolic blessing intelligible and
+living.
+
+
+LETTER VI
+
+Page 14: "For _other_ sins," etc. I think this is an incorrect comment.
+The force of the threat is positive, not comparative. The language of
+the law is similar towards every sin.
+
+In what is said about the abomination of hypocrisy in prayer we
+cordially agree. God give us grace to avoid it ourselves, and to warn
+our brethren faithfully against it! But in what follows there is an
+assumption of a power of discipline which the clergy do not possess,
+and which I fear the laity would be most unwilling to concede to them.
+Mr. Ruskin seems also to slip into the old error of the servants in the
+parable of the tares.
+
+
+LETTER VII
+
+On page 21 St. John xiv. 9 is incorrectly cited, and it is difficult to
+know the exact drift of the writer.
+
+I object to the statement that "in all His relations to us and commands
+to us," etc. (See, _e.g._, St. Matt. xxviii. 18-20.)
+
+As to His not knowing whether His prayer could be heard, see St. John
+xi. 41, 42.
+
+I think it is incorrect to say that our Lord Himself _used_ the prayer
+He gave us, at least in its entirety as it stands.
+
+Pages 20, 21: Mr. Ruskin seems to me to draw most strongly the very
+comparison to which he objects. Surely the kingdom of Christ _is_ the
+kingdom of His Father. (Rev. xi. 15, xii. 10; Eph. v. 5.) Does not an
+unwillingness to accept the true divinity of our Lord underlie this
+passage?
+
+
+LETTER VIII
+
+Page 25: There is surely a mistake here. Personal sanctification and
+national prosperity are very different things. A nation has no existence
+except in this world; therefore its prosperity is the chief end to be
+aimed at; and this is no doubt promoted by the holiness of its people.
+But a man has another life hereafter; and comfort and wealth are not the
+end of his being. If granted, they are means to his sanctification, not
+_vice versa_.
+
+It seems to me that Mr. Ruskin in this Letter writes somewhat
+recklessly, and that he must have been singularly unfortunate in his
+experience of preachers if he has never heard a faithful sermon against
+covetousness, which is the idolatry of our age. On page 26 he seems to
+fall into a great error in supposing that the proclamation of a free
+pardon for sin tends to encourage it. If a man is to be delivered from
+the power of his sins, he must first be delivered from the guilt of
+them.
+
+No doubt the grace of God has been abused by some; and St. Paul himself
+felt that his doctrine was open to such abuse (Rom. vi. 1, 15). It is
+not, I think, just to attribute the corruption of our great cities to
+the teaching of the clergy. It is rather to be ascribed to the absence
+of that teaching.
+
+
+LETTER X
+
+Whatever justice there may be (and no doubt there is much) in Mr.
+Ruskin's accusations against us clergy, he is surely under an entire
+misapprehension in the charge which he here makes against our Liturgy.
+
+Our Prayer Book is doubtless constructed for the use of believing
+Christians, and is not fitted for the impenitent; but its adaptation to
+the needs of the repentant publican and of the advanced Christian is
+most wonderful. And that a form of prayer may be so adapted is surely
+proved by the Lord's Prayer itself, which Mr. Ruskin says is the _first_
+thing to be taught to all, and which, with all his practice in thinking,
+he feels that he cannot adequately expound.
+
+Surely the repetition of a confession of unholiness casts no slur upon
+the efficacy of our prayers for holiness when we recognize that holiness
+is progressive, and that spiritual growth may express itself not merely
+in new words, but in a heartier utterance of the old ones. As to the
+particular expression, "there is no health in us," it needs either the
+explanation of St. Paul--"I know that in me, _that is, in my flesh_,
+dwelleth no good thing,"--or else to be understood according to the old
+meaning of "health," viz., "_saving health_," _salvation_, _deliverance_
+(Psalm cxix. 123, Prayer Book; Isa. lviii. 8; Jer. viii. 15).
+
+It needs further to be remarked that repentance is not only a single
+definite act, but a state of mind.
+
+I think that underlying all these comments of Mr. Ruskin on the Lord's
+Prayer is a failure to recognize the truth of man's fall.
+
+Human nature is a ruin, not to be restored by a rearrangement of its
+fragments. God has provided a remedy, by sending His Son to be the
+foundation of a new spiritual building; and every man who is to be built
+upon that foundation must himself become a new creature by the
+operation of the Holy Ghost. All efforts to improve humanity in the
+mass, without the renewal of each separate soul, must fail; and no doubt
+the clergy often fall into this mistake.
+
+The Lord's Prayer is not the prayer of all mankind as they are by
+nature. It is a prayer to the possession of which they are brought by
+regeneration, and to the enjoyment by conversion.
+
+ E. H. M'NEILE.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ P. T. OUVRY.
+
+
+On the meaning of usury, I would add a few words. I start with this
+proposition. There is nothing contrary to the will of God for one free
+man to buy from another free man anything he wants. I have two
+houses,--one I live in, one I let. My tenant pays the market rent of
+houses to me, and so both parties are benefited. I have two thousand
+pounds. I have no capacity, or opportunity, or desire to use more than
+one thousand pounds in trade on my own account. My neighbour has energy
+and activity to use more money than he has in trade. He gladly offers me
+five per cent. for my spare thousand pounds. I willingly lend it on
+those terms. He makes ten per cent. by using it. He gives me five pounds
+and has five pounds for himself. If this be usury, it is lawful and
+right.
+
+A number of small cultivators of land have no capital. A money-lender
+supplies what they require on condition that they sell their crops to
+him at a price which he is able to fix. From the circumstances of the
+case the money-lender makes an enormous profit. The cultivator has
+barely the necessaries of life. This is usury, in the bad sense of the
+term, but is more correctly called oppression or extortion.
+
+Again, a man lends money to ignorant inexperienced youths, on promise of
+repayment when they come of age. This, too, is oppression or extortion.
+
+Similar oppression is witnessed when bad houses are let to poor people
+at high rents.
+
+It is not, then, that usury, in the sense of oppression or extortion, is
+inherent in money-lending; but it belongs equally to every transaction
+between man and man, where any unrighteous dealing is practised.
+
+ P. T. OUVRY.
+
+
+
+
+ GRANGE-OVER-SANDS,
+ _October 1st, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I protested strongly yesterday against our remarks,
+made on the spur of the moment, being printed and submitted to Mr.
+Ruskin's criticism, and what I said then I feel as strongly still.
+
+But I have no objection to send, as a comment on his Letters, a volume
+of sermons which I published last year, because I think that, in that
+upon the hallowing of God's name, I have not taken the restricted view
+which Mr. Ruskin accused the clergy of taking, and I think also that
+(except in the sermon upon the doctrine of the Trinity, which was
+written before the others, and is tinged with the prejudices of early
+training), I have set forth God the Father as a Being of infinite,
+tender, fatherly love.
+
+So far as snails may follow in the footsteps of greyhounds, and bats
+look in the same direction as eagles, I think some of us clergymen are
+getting our feet and our eyes into the same track as Mr. Ruskin's.
+
+It seems to me that all of us who think upon religious matters, laity or
+clergy, whether men of genius or commonplace people, are feeling our way
+at present to something better and truer. Men like Mr. Ruskin, like
+steamships, dart on to their destination; and feebler minds, like
+sailing vessels, are a good deal at the mercy of the _popularis aura_
+and the winds of doctrine, but both are on their way to the same point.
+
+I send the volume by the same post as this letter.
+
+ Yours very faithfully,
+ H. R. S.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ A. G. K. SIMPSON, _Brighton_.
+
+
+We are convinced that the love of God is the originating cause of all
+His dealings with mankind, and are glad to meet him on the broad
+platform of "Our Father which art in heaven;" only premising that it is
+a platform not new to us, but on which we have long taken our stand.
+
+But beyond these somewhat general statements of our faith, I doubt
+whether it would be possible to put Divine truth into such plain words
+as would meet with general acceptance. In proportion to the _minuteness_
+would be the _disagreement_. To take one great truth (perhaps the
+greatest of all), would it be possible to put forth a plain and simple
+statement, such as all, or the majority, would receive, of the
+Atonement? Such a mind as Mr. Ruskin's would not be content with the
+forensic view more popular some years ago than now. Wiser, it seems to
+me, it is to accept some such teaching as that of Coleridge in "Aids to
+Reflection." "The mysterious act, the operative cause," he says, "is
+transcendent." "_Factum est_," and beyond the information contained in
+the enunciation of the fact, it can be characterized only by its
+consequences. It is these consequences which (according to Coleridge)
+are illustrated by the four metaphors:--
+
+ 1. Sin-offering or expiation.
+
+ 2. Reconciliation.
+
+ 3. Redemption.
+
+ 4. Payment of a debt.
+
+Now, would not a plain, a simple statement, be apt to press the metaphor
+too far, and attempt to put into words one aspect of the truth as though
+it were the whole? Such a reverent mind as Bishop Butler's reproved the
+curiosity which sought to find out the manner of the atonement. "I do
+not find," he said, "that it is declared in the Scriptures." And yet the
+atonement is only _one_, though perhaps the _chief_, of the many points
+of which a true and simple statement must take cognizance. It would be
+comparatively easy for the private clergyman to put into words his
+thoughts on this subject or that, but then he would be continually
+liable to have it urged against him that he had not sufficiently
+considered some given point--had not walked round it, and seen it in all
+its bearings; that his view was inadequate and incomplete; and, being
+fallible and human, some of the objections would doubtless be true, and
+the simple and plain statement be, in that respect at least,
+misguiding.
+
+
+
+
+ _From the Rev._ G. W. WALL, _Bickerstaffe_.
+
+
+ LETTER II
+
+This Letter professes to contain an "exact question," which is somewhat
+singularly inexactly put. In its strict grammatical form it asks for a
+definition of the members of a Clerical Council, and their business as
+such. This "exact question" is in fact an illustration of the fallacy of
+asking two questions in one, though a question demanding to be answered
+with "mathematical" precision should have been set with mathematical
+accuracy. But here at the outset a protest must be entered against being
+called upon to answer a question set in ambiguous words and misleading
+phrases, and based upon assumptions which those questioned would reject.
+It is impossible to deal with a so-called "axiomatic" question which
+instantly passes into a cloudy rhetorical illustration.
+
+"The attached servants of a particular State." Does that expression
+mean, "England, with all thy faults, I love thee still"? or, is it used
+in the same sense as "attached to the staff"? But are there many of the
+clergy who would say, "I am an attached and salaried servant of the
+State, and nothing more?" Are there many who would allow that they were
+"salaried" by the State at all? Are there many who would grant that they
+had been "examined" and "numbered" and admitted into a "body of
+trustworthy persons" either by the State or by its agents? And yet all
+these previous questions must be answered before we can consider at all
+the "axiomatic" question which the clergy are "earnestly called upon" to
+solve. The question set down for solution implies some such inquiries as
+these: Is not the Church of England merely a Department of the State of
+England? Does not a clergyman belong to the Ecclesiastical Service just
+as an _employe_ of the Treasury, or the Home Office, or the Post Office,
+belongs to the Civil Service? For example, the authorities at Chamouni
+examine and approve of certain men as guides for mountaineering: does
+not the English State similarly examine and approve of certain men as
+guides for England and the English "in the way known of all good men
+that leadeth unto life"? A most fallacious employment of a "universal"
+for a "particular," for either the clergy must be excluded from the
+number of "all good men," or the assertion that all good men agree in
+their knowledge falls to the ground, seeing that in the fourth Letter
+the clergy are charged with not having "determined quite clearly" what
+the way that leadeth unto life may be.
+
+But taking this Alpine illustration for what it may be worth, we may
+ask, "What does it mean?" Is it not intended to exalt practical
+questions, and to depreciate all doctrine and dogma and theological
+opinion, either from its liability on the one hand to be narrow or
+insular, "Chamounist or Grindelwaldist," or on the other from its
+tendency to be vague and transcendental, dealing with "celestial
+mountains" and unfathomable "crevasses"? Will it not admit of some such
+paraphrase as this, "Your teachings as to Episcopacy or
+Congregationalism, seven sacraments or two, and the like, are mere local
+opinions, and so away with them; your doctrines as to the Holy Trinity,
+the Incarnation, and the like, are mere transcendentalism, and so away
+with them also,--
+
+ 'For modes of faith let zealous bigots fight,
+ He can't be wrong whose life is in the right.'"
+
+Still it may be allowable to hint that the qualifications of a "guide"
+as laid down in this Letter are somewhat peculiar. It might have been
+supposed by a plain man that a Chamounist guide was expected to know at
+least something as to the localities of the Mer de Glace, the Jardin, or
+the Grand Mulets, but he is seemingly to rise superior to any
+"Chamounist opinions on geography," and to be prepared to rely only upon
+a universal science of locality and athletics, a reliance which has been
+the fruitful cause of mountaineering fatalities.
+
+The reply which most Clerical Councils would return respecting the
+"axiomatic" question of this Letter would probably be, "We cannot answer
+a fallacy; we are not careful to answer thee in this matter."
+
+
+ LETTER III
+
+A second question is now propounded respecting the Christian Gospel.
+"The Gospel of Christ" is spoken of in a connection which seems to
+indicate that Luther and Augustine were equally, in the writer's
+opinion, the setters forth of a "gospel." Is this an unintentional
+disclosure of his estimate of our blessed Lord,--"Rabbi, we know that
+Thou art a teacher come from God," and no more than that? For the eighth
+Letter contains a sneer at the Gospel that He is our Advocate with the
+Father, as one to mend the world with. A confused question follows,
+which may mean either, that it is in the first place desirable that the
+Gospel should be put into plain words, or, that the first principles of
+the Gospel should be put into plain words. Its probable meaning is, "Is
+it not desirable that religious teaching should be divested of any
+mysteries?" The extraordinary supposition that the Gospel is intended to
+be set forth in the Thirty-nine Articles can only be equalled by a
+supposition that a treatise on military tactics is embodied in the
+Articles of War. Perhaps even some of the axiomatic principles of
+mathematics, such as that "a point is that which hath no parts," though
+laid down in "plain words and short terms," might sorely perplex "simple
+persons."
+
+But several fallacies underlie this second question. The fallacy that
+the moral principles of our nature are necessarily connected with the
+extent of our intellectual capacities; the fallacy that Divine Truths
+can be adequately expressed through the inaccurate instrument of human
+language; the fallacy that deep things are necessarily made plain by the
+use of plain words; the fallacy that everything upon which we act is
+necessarily understood. A plain man does not refuse to use the telegraph
+because he may know nothing about the Correlation of Force, or a simple
+person to travel because "space" is beyond his comprehension. If the
+Gospel is, as St. Paul says it is, a revelation of the power of God unto
+salvation, an amount of mystery must necessarily surround it. Since it
+is impossible that the Divine Nature should be to us other than a
+mystery, a revelation of Divine purposes such as is the Gospel as
+understood by the Church, must remain mysterious also. Only upon the
+supposition that our Lord was the teacher of a high but still human
+morality can we remove all mystery from the Christian Gospel, if it
+still deserve the name. Such teaching might be conveyed in plain words
+and short terms, but it would cease to be a Gospel which angels desire
+to look into, and could hardly be described as the "manifold wisdom of
+God," or be the story of the "love of Christ, which passeth knowledge."
+
+The Gospel, as the Church understands it, rests upon the revealed fact
+of the Incarnation, or the union of the Infinite with the Finite, that
+He who is very God of very God became man in order to introduce the
+Divine possibility of manhood being made to partake of the Divine
+nature; and so long as the triumphal chant ascends that "the Catholic
+Faith is this," so long will the Church's Faith be veiled indeed with
+mystery, and so long will she continue to gather within her bounds the
+humble and holy men of heart, who are content to say, "I cannot
+understand: I love." That "God sent His only-begotten Son into the
+world that we might live through Him" are short and plain words enough,
+and Gospel enough, surely, but the depth of their meaning is
+unfathomable by even the most cultivated understanding, to which the
+power of God and the wisdom of God may appear to be but foolishness.
+
+
+ LETTER IX
+
+This Letter, after endorsing the expressions of the preceding one, deals
+apparently with Capital and Labour. The clergy, if not required to
+divide the inheritance among their brethren, or to actually serve
+tables, are, taking "Property is theft" as their text, to resolutely and
+daily inquire how the dinners of their flock are earned. The gist of the
+Letter seems to be that the worker earns and the capitalist steals his
+dinner. It is really possible that the clergy do constantly speak the
+truth, boldly rebuke vice, and patiently suffer for the truth's sake,
+even though they may not subscribe to all the articles of some peculiar
+schemes of social science, nor hold some singular doctrines as to
+political economy. Doubtless were they to assimilate their conduct to
+that of an injudicious district-visitor, they would have to take a new
+view of "life and its sacraments," whatever this expression may mean.
+
+It would seem as if the writer had yet to learn that a Christian Church
+may exist teaching the most dogmatic definitions of doctrine, binding,
+even in this respect, burdens on men's shoulders grievous to be borne,
+while its members may be patterns of self-denial in "offices of temporal
+ministry to the poor." He does not appear to regard with favour the
+"Evangelistic sect of the English Church;" if this is intended for the
+"Evangelical" sect, Charles Kingsley could say, in a certain place, of
+its founders, "They were inspired by a strange new instinct that God had
+bidden them 'to clothe the hungry and feed the naked.'" Yet these men
+thought that "justification by faith only" was the Gospel they were "to
+carry to mend the world with, forsooth."
+
+
+ LETTER XI
+
+This concluding Letter calls but for slight remark,--of many portions we
+feel _O si sic omnia_! That there is much sorrowful truth underlying the
+unmeasured denunciations which have gone before few will care to deny.
+Few there are who will not pray to be kept from the evils which the
+writer discerns, and against which he inveighs. Such will be the first
+to regret that the Letters, as they read them, seem to fall short of the
+fulness of the Catholic Faith. "The holy teachers of all nations:" was
+our blessed Lord but one of them? There is nothing in the Letters to
+show that "the full force and meaning" of Gospel teaching is concerned
+with anything beyond wealth, and comfort, and national prosperity, and
+domestic peace. Preaching the acceptable year of the Lord is something
+more surely than an invective against usury.
+
+We read that in old times Bezaleel was filled for his own work with the
+Spirit of God, but we do not read that he aspired to become a religious
+teacher; and when we are told by one eminent in Art that a Church
+nineteen centuries old has yet to learn that the "will of the Lord" is a
+sanctification which brings comfort and wealth in its train, we think of
+a Moses who esteemed the reproach of Christ greater riches than all the
+treasures of Egypt, and then of a Paul who counted all things but loss
+for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus his Lord.
+
+ G. W. WALL.
+
+
+
+
+ _From_ OXONIENSIS.
+
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--Many thanks for the pamphlet. You ask me to send you
+any remarks I may have to make on the Letters, and I gather from your
+note at the beginning of the Letters as they now stand, that you intend
+making use of any remarks sent you that may commend themselves to your
+judgment. I am not vain enough to think mine of any special value. I
+will, however, write you my feelings about them, encouraged to do so by
+your statement in the note to the pamphlet, that the use made of
+remarks sent you will be anonymous, if it is so desired.
+
+First, as regards the general tone of the Letters. You tell me that the
+majority of the comments you have received have been hostile--people not
+taking their medicine without making wry faces. I am only surprised at
+the gentleness of the Letters, and I believe that if anyone will take
+the trouble to put down for himself on paper the sum of their contents,
+he will find it as difficult to gainsay as for careless readers it is
+easy to cavil at. On the other hand, the "hostile spirit" is readily
+provoked by the way in which some of the teaching of the Letters is put.
+Passages like the sixth paragraph in Letter X. appear an objectionable
+joke to some--perhaps to most--people; they do not see that it is really
+a serious jest, so put for brevity's sake, and that Ruskin might have
+put the same note to it as he has put to a passage in the "Crown of Wild
+Olive," p. 85, 8vo ed.: "Quite serious all this, though it reads like
+jest." I remember once asking Ruskin if his apparent joking in some
+Oxford lectures was not likely to lessen his influence, and he at once
+said to me, "Remember that most of my apparent jokes are serious,
+_ghastly_ jests." I think he would be less often misunderstood, if this
+were more often understood.
+
+Your own preface marks the two main points in the spirit of the Letters.
+They are sternly practical, and at the same time their standard is one
+of an ideal perfection. People don't see that because the goal cannot be
+reached, the road towards it can still be trodden, and therefore they
+apply to the road an epithet which applies only to the goal. In this
+respect Ruskin's teaching might be mottoed with George Herbert's--
+
+ "Who aimeth at the sky
+ Shoots higher much than he that means a tree."
+
+In fact, Ruskin's teaching, like that of the Bible, is not unpractical,
+but _unpractised_.
+
+I will now take the Letters in detail. The first four of them are merely
+introductory to the main matter of the eleven. In these first five two
+questions are asked--
+
+1. What is a clergyman of the Church of England? And to this the
+suggested answer is (whom does it offend?), "A teacher of the Gospel of
+Christ to all nations."
+
+2. What is the teaching of the Gospel he is to teach? What is that
+teaching, clearly and simply put?
+
+Then Letter IV. suggests that the Lord's Prayer may be taken as
+containing the cardinal points of that teaching, containing not all that
+is to be learnt, but what all have to learn. And so we come to Letter
+V.; and I tried, in reading the Letters for myself, to do for them what
+Letter III. asks clergymen to do for the Gospel.
+
+Letter V.--A clergyman's first duty is to make the Lord's Prayer clear
+and living to his people. This is what Ruskin has elsewhere insisted on
+in other matters--"clear," know your duty and your belief; "living,"
+realize it in your life--realize it "as a Captain's order, to be obeyed"
+("Crown of Wild Olive," Introduction, p. 13. The whole of this
+Introduction reads well with these Letters). Then the first clause of
+the Prayer is set forth as putting before us God as a loving Father.
+
+Letter VI.--"Hallowed be Thy name." How do we fulfil the hope in our
+lives? How do we betray it? Not in swearing only, as we are apt to
+think, but in the blasphemy of false and hypocritical prayer to, and
+praise of, _preaching about_ God (last paragraph of the Letter).
+Clergymen, it is added, can prevent openly wicked men from being in
+their congregations (they are supposed to do so: Rubrics 2 and 3 before
+the Holy Communion Service); they can not only compel the wicked poor
+into, but expel the wicked rich out of, churches. God sees the heart:
+the clergy should look to the hands and lips.
+
+Letter VII.--"Thy kingdom come:"--not an allusion to the second coming
+of the Son, which we cannot hasten, but to the coming of the kingdom of
+God the Father, which we can. This is again illustrated by the "Crown of
+Wild Olive" (I daresay it is by others of Ruskin's books, but it is
+convenient to refer chiefly to one, and that the one which contains what
+he calls his most biblical lecture), p. 56: "Observe it is a kingdom
+that is to come to us; we are not to go to it. Also it is not to be a
+kingdom of the dead, but of the living. Also it is not to come all at
+once, but quietly ... without observation. _Also it is not to come
+outside of us, but in our hearts: 'the kingdom of God is within you.'_"
+This is the sense in which we can hasten _it_.
+
+Letter VIII. begins with a hit at the pleasure priests take in their
+priesthood's dignity, and at their avoidance of its unpleasant duties,
+and at their sometimes wearisome preaching.
+
+Have they ever taught "Thy will be done," as it should be--1. In our own
+sanctification; 2. In understanding that will, and doing it, and
+striving to get it done (knowing their duty and doing it, and it alone)?
+
+The remarks about the mediatorial (absolving-from-punishment) and the
+pastoral (purging-from-sin) functions of a "pastor," seem to me quite
+admirable.
+
+The end of the Letter is subsequently amplified, Letter X.
+
+Letter IX.--"Give us this day our daily bread." Yes, but we must work
+for it. "The man that will not work, neither shall he eat." A cardinal
+point with Ruskin: "But if you do" (_i.e._, wish for God's kingdom),
+"you must do more than pray for it, you must work for it" ("Crown of
+Wild Olive," p. 56).
+
+And the clergyman has to teach (Letter IX. goes on) what that work is
+and how it is to be done; and the life, to which their teaching should
+lead, is one "moderate in its self-indulgence, wide in its offices of
+temporal ministry to the poor," in the absence of which, prayer for
+harvest is mere blasphemy. For the spiritual bread is the first thing,
+and a clergyman's first message, "Choose ye this day whom ye will
+serve."
+
+Letter X.--"Forgive us our trespasses." The explanation of trespasses,
+and substitution of _debts_ for it, is admirable ("Dimitte nobis
+_debita_ nostra"), and admirably illustrated by the sins of omission
+being condemned in Christ's judgment,--"I was hungry, and ye gave Me no
+meat."
+
+The remarks on the "pleasantness" of the English liturgy recall those on
+the avoidance of unpleasantness by the English clergy in Letter VIII.
+
+I pass over the notes on the advantage of "forms of prayer," and come to
+the end of Letter X. and Letter XI., which go together, and say
+practically, Pray honestly or not at all. "Faithful prayer implies
+always correlative exertions;" "dishonest prayer is blasphemy of the
+worst kind."
+
+"Crown of Wild Olive," p. 55, again: "Everybody in this room has been
+taught to pray daily, 'Thy kingdom come.' Now, if we hear a man swear in
+the streets, we think it very wrong, and say he 'takes God's name in
+vain.' But there is a twenty times worse way of taking His name in vain
+than that. It is to _ask God for what we don't want_. He doesn't like
+that sort of prayer. If you don't want a thing, don't ask for it; such
+asking is the worst mockery of your King you can insult Him with; the
+soldiers striking Him on the head was nothing to that. If you do not
+wish for His kingdom, don't pray for it."
+
+In fact, prayer is worse than useless if not sincere, and it is
+insincere if not carried out in the life of the "pray-er." Thus, "One
+hour in the execution of justice is worth seventy years of (insincere)
+prayer" (Mahometan maxim, "Crown of Wild Olive," p. 49).
+
+I must stop. Only the fifth paragraph in Letter XI., about parents
+looking for "opportunities" for their children, is exactly parallel
+with "Sesame and Lilies," 8vo edition, p. 2 (Sub. 1, Sec. 2), which might
+be added in an illustrative note. I must apologize for my long and
+rambling letter, but if it is of the least service to you I shall be
+content. I feel how inadequate it is to what I meant it to be, only I
+have no time just now to do more than write, as this letter is
+written--at the point of the pen.
+
+ OXONIENSIS.
+
+
+
+
+ LETTERS FROM
+
+ BRANTWOOD-ON-THE-LAKE
+
+ TO THE
+
+ VICARAGE OF BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS
+
+
+
+
+ PREFACE
+
+
+Some apology will naturally be expected for setting the following
+letters before the searching eye of a critical and possibly censorious
+public. I can only plead that the suggestion of their publication did
+not emanate from myself (for the idea of making these letters public
+property had never once in fifteen years crossed my mind), but was made
+to me by friends to whom it appeared that much in these letters is
+strongly characteristic of Mr. Ruskin, and illustrates (much too
+indulgently, alas!) the estimate he is good enough to form of a
+correspondent who does not to this day clearly understand to what happy
+circumstance he is indebted for so fortunate a partiality. At the same
+time it must be confessed that _Laudari a viro laudato_ is a harmless
+ambition for the possession of a stimulus which is good for every soul
+of man.
+
+I will say no more upon that subject, lest my self-depreciation should
+be set down to vanity. Nevertheless it has always been a source of
+innocent pleasure to me that I have been enabled to bring my ship
+without damage through so perilous a voyage to port in a safe and
+honourable harbourage.
+
+The matters discussed in the following letters range only over a narrow
+field; but it will be found that they present a truly life-like picture
+of the writer with his shrewd common-sense and deeper wisdom, enlivened
+in no small measure by a quick impulsiveness which is sometimes rather
+startling. Some of his sudden sallies serve the purpose of the
+condiments, which displeasing if taken alone, give piquancy to our
+ordinary food.
+
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ 1.
+
+
+ _July 8th, 1879._
+
+MY DEAR MR. MALLESON,--You must make no public announcement of any paper
+by me. I am not able to count on my powers of mind for an hour; and will
+absolutely take no responsibility. What I do send you--if anything--will
+be in the form of a series of short letters to yourself, of which you
+have already the first: This the second for the sake of continuing the
+order unbroken contains the next following question which I should like
+to ask. If when the sequence of letters is in your possession you like
+to read any part or parts of them as a subject of discussion at your
+afternoon meeting, I shall be glad and grateful.
+
+ Ever faithfully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 2.
+
+
+ [_Undated._]
+
+I am so ashamed of keeping R.'s book--but it's impossible for me to look
+at it properly till I have done my lecture, so much must be left undone
+of it anyhow * * *
+
+Yes--you were glad to find we were at one in many thoughts. So was I.
+But we are not yet, you know, at one in our _sight_ of this world and
+the dark ways of it. I hope to have you for a St. George's soldier one
+day.
+
+
+
+
+ 3.
+
+
+ _23rd July, 1879._
+
+Thanks for your note and your kind feelings. But you ought to know more
+about me.
+
+I profess to be a teacher; as you profess also.
+
+But we teach on totally different methods.
+
+_You_ believe what you wish to believe; teach that it is wicked to doubt
+it, and remain at rest and in much self-satisfaction.
+
+_I_ believe what I find to be true, whether I like or dislike it. And I
+teach other people that the chief of all wickednesses is to tell lies in
+God's service, and to disgrace our Master and destroy His sheep as
+_involuntary_ Wolves.
+
+_I_, therefore, am in perpetual effort to learn and discern--in
+perpetual Unrest and Dissatisfaction with myself.
+
+But it would simply require you to do twenty years of such hard work as
+I have done before you could in any true sense speak a word to me on
+such matters. You could not use a word in my sense. It would always mean
+to you something different.
+
+For instance--one of my quite bye works in learning my business of a
+teacher--was to read the New Testament through in the earliest Greek MS.
+(eleventh century) which I could get hold of. I examined every syllable
+of it and have more notes of various readings and on the real meanings
+of perverted passages than you would get through in a year's work. But I
+should require you to do the same work before I would discuss a text
+with you. From that and such work in all kinds I have formed opinions
+which you could no more move than you could Coniston Old Man. They may
+be wrong, God knows; I _trust_ in them infinitely less than you do in
+those which you have formed simply by refusing to examine--or to
+think--or to know what is doing in the world about you; but you cannot
+stir them.
+
+I very very rarely make presents of my books. If people are inclined to
+learn from them, I say to them as a physician would--Pay me my fee--you
+will not obey me if I give you advice for nothing.
+
+But I should like a kind neighbour like you to know something about me,
+and I have therefore desired my publisher to send you one[21] of my many
+books which, after doing the work that I have done, you would have to
+read before you could really use words in my meaning.
+
+ [21] Crown of Wild Olive.--ED.
+
+ If you will read the introduction carefully, and especially dwell
+ on the 10th to 15th lines of the 15th page, you will at least know
+ me a little better than to think I believe in my own
+ resurrection--but not in Christ's: and if you look to the final
+ essay on War, you may find some things in it which will be of
+ interest to you in your own[22] work.
+
+ [22] Translating some of Erckmann-Chatrian's.--ED.
+
+
+
+
+ 4.
+
+
+ VENICE, _8th September, 1879_.
+
+* * * * There is nothing whatever said as far as I remember in the July
+'Fors,' about "people's surrendering their judgment." A colonel does not
+surrender his judgment in obeying his general, nor a soldier in obeying
+his colonel. But there can be no army where they _act_ on their own
+judgments.
+
+The Society of Jesuits is a splendid proof of the power of obedience,
+but its curse is falsehood. When the Master of St. George's Company bids
+you lie, it will be time to compare our discipline to the Jesuits. We
+are their precise opposites--fiercely and at all costs frank, while they
+are calmly and for all interests lying.
+
+
+
+
+ 5.
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON,
+ _July 30th, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I fear I have kept the proofs too long, but I wanted
+to look atain. I am confirmed in my impression that the book will do
+much good.[23] But I think it would have done more if you had written
+the lives of two or three of your parishioners. Such an answer would I
+give to a painter who sent to me a picture of the Last Supper. "You had
+better, it seems to me, have painted a Harvest Home." I am gravely
+doubtful of the possibility, in these days, of writing or painting on
+such subjects, advisedly and securely.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+ [23] Life and Work of Jesus Christ. Ward & Lock.--ED.
+
+
+
+
+ 6.
+
+
+ _July 31st, 1879._
+
+I have received this week the two most astonishing letters I ever yet
+received in my life. And one of them is yours, read this
+morning--telling me--that you don't think you could write the life of an
+old woman! Yet you think you _can_ write the life of Christ!
+
+If you can at all explain this state of your mind to me I will tell you
+more distinctly what I think of the piece I saw. But I don't think you
+will communicate the thought to your publisher; and I never meant you to
+use my former one in that manner.
+
+Mind a publisher thinks only of money, and I know nothing of
+saleableness. The pause in my other letters is one of pure astonishment
+at you; which at present occupies all the time I have to spare on the
+subject, and has culminated to-day.
+
+I am so puzzled. I can scarcely think of anything else till you tell me
+what you mean in the bit about being "called late."
+
+Have you done no work in the vineyard 'yet' then?
+
+
+
+
+ 7.
+
+
+ _August 2nd, 1879._
+
+I am still simply speechless with astonishment at you. It is no question
+of your right to the best I can say; it is all at your command. But for
+the present my tongue cleaves to the roof of my mouth. I can only tell you
+with all the strength I have to read and understand and believe 2 Esdras
+iv. 2, 20, 21.[24]
+
+ [24] Thy heart hath gone too far in this world, and thinkest thou
+ to comprehend the way of the most High? Then answered he me, and
+ said, Thou hast given a right judgment, but why judgest thou not
+ thyself also. For like as the ground is given unto the wood, and
+ the sea to his floods: even so they that dwell upon the earth may
+ understand nothing, but that which is upon the earth: and he only
+ that dwelleth above the heavens, may understand the things that are
+ above the height of the heavens.
+
+
+
+
+ 8.
+
+
+ _August 4th, 1879._
+
+It is just because you undertook the task so _happily_, that I should
+have thought you unfit to write the life of a Man of Sorrows, even had
+he been a Man only. But your last letter, remember, claims inspiration
+for your guide, and recognizes a personal call at sixty, as if the Call
+to the ministry had been none, and the receiving the Holy Ghost by
+imposition of hands an empty ceremony.
+
+In writing the life of a parishioner and in remitting or retaining their
+sins you would in my conception have been fulfilling your appointed
+work. But I cannot conceive the claim to be a fit Evangelist without
+more proof of miraculous appointment than you are conscious of. I know
+you to be conscientious, yes--but I think the judicial doom of this
+country is to have conscience alike of its Priests and Prophets
+_hardened_. Why should any letter of mine make you anxious if you had
+indeed conscience of inspiration?
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 9.
+
+
+ _August 7th._
+
+I hope to be able soon now to resume the series of letters; but it seems
+to me there is no need whatever of more than three or four more
+respecting the last clauses of the Lord's Prayer. Those in your hands
+contain questions enough, if seriously entertained, to occupy twenty
+meetings; and I could only hope that some one of them might be carefully
+taken up by your friends. I think, however, in case of the clerical
+feeling being too strong, that I must ask you, if you print letters at
+all, to print them without omission. And if you do not print them, to
+return them to me for my own expansion and arrangement.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 10.
+
+
+ _August 9th._
+
+I have got to work on the letters again; it would make me nervous to
+think of all these plans of yours. Suppose you leave all that till you
+see what the first debate comes to?[25] And in the meantime I'll finish
+as best I can.
+
+ [25] My clerical friends and brethren must not be displeased with
+ me if I here mention the fact that at the meeting of twenty-three
+ clergy where I _proposed_ to read Mr. Ruskin's letters to them, I
+ was only authorized to do so by a majority of two. I can scarcely
+ describe the dismay and consternation with which the letters
+ themselves were received,--though of course not universally, in
+ another meeting of the same number.
+
+
+
+
+ 11.
+
+
+ _September 2nd._
+
+That there are only a hundred copies in that form,[26] is just a reason
+why the book should be in your library, where it will be enjoyed and
+useful; and not in mine, where it would not be opened once in a
+twelvemonth. It is one of the advantages of a small house (and it has
+many) that one is compelled to consider of all one's books whether they
+are in use or not.
+
+ [26] Grosart, "Poems of Christopher Harvey."
+
+I yesterday ordered a 'Fors' to be sent you containing in its close the
+most important piece of a religious character in the book--this I hope
+you will also allow to stay on your shelves. The two that I sent with
+this note contain so much that is saucy that I only send them in case
+you want to look at the challenge referred to in the Letters to the
+Bishop of Manchester, see October, 1877, pp. 322, 323, and January 1875,
+p. 11. You can keep as long as you like, but please take care of them,
+as my index is not yet done. The next letter will come before the week
+end, but it's a difficult one.
+
+
+
+
+ 12.
+
+
+ THE VICARAGE,
+ BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS,
+ _September 4th, 1879_.
+
+MY DEAR MR. RUSKIN,--These parish engagements having been discharged
+which have taken up my time very closely since I came back from
+Brighton, I am returning to your letters, and I think you would like to
+know what I am doing. I am copying them down, first, as I can read them
+aloud better in my own handwriting, and secondly, because I shall not
+place the originals in the printer's hands.
+
+Then many thoughts arise in my mind as I re-peruse them, and I must
+needs (and I think I am allowed) give expression to my thoughts. Hence
+each letter is followed by my own comments or reflections upon it. But
+this need not make you feel nervous. On the whole there is much
+agreement between your modes of thought on religious subjects and my
+own.
+
+If this is thought a piece of cool assurance, I may reply in the words
+or sense of Euclid, That similar triangles may have the most various
+areas. I am not equal to you, but I claim to be similar. These comments
+I sometimes think I ought to show to you before publication; but perhaps
+you will agree with me that if I am fit to be trusted at all, I had
+better be left unconstrained. I shall certainly come to you first, if I
+find myself seriously at variance with you, which has not happened yet
+as far as the first clause of the Lord's Prayer. Then it is likely that
+I shall read the letters before two or three Clerical Societies,[27]
+including my own, the Furness.
+
+ [27] At Liverpool and Brighton.
+
+The opinions delivered by those clergy it will be my duty, and I hope it
+will be my pleasure, to collect and to record. I propose also to invite
+the clergy who have not time or opportunity to speak in the meeting to
+write to me, and I will use my best judgment in selecting from their
+correspondence all that seems worth preserving.
+
+I am very sensible that this is a most delicate and responsible task
+that is laid upon me, and I wonder to find myself so engaged. It will
+need tact, discretion, and kindness of heart, and I trust I may be
+endued with the necessary qualifications to a much larger extent than I
+think I naturally possess.
+
+I find no small comfort at the foot of the first page of the Preface to
+"Sesame and Lilies." There I feel I am at one with you.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ F. A. MALLESON.
+
+
+
+
+ 13.
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _September 5th, 1879_.
+
+I shall be delighted to have the comments, though it will be well first
+to have the series of letters done--the last but one is coming
+to-morrow. I have only written them in the sense of your sympathy in
+most points, and am sure you will make the best possible use of them.
+
+
+
+
+ 14.
+
+
+ _September 7th, 1879._
+
+It is rather comic that your first reply to my challenge concerning
+usury should be a prospectus of a Company[28] wishing to make 5 per
+cent. out of Broughton poor men's ignorance. You couldn't have sent me a
+project I should have regarded with more abomination.
+
+ [28] A projected Public Hall.
+
+
+
+
+ 15.
+
+
+ _September 9th, 1879._
+
+There is absolutely no debate possible as to what usury is any more
+than what adultery is. The Church has only been polluted by the
+indulgence of it since the 16th century. Usury is _any kind whatever_ of
+interest on loan, and it is the essential modern form of Satan.
+
+I send you an old book full of sound and eternal teaching on this
+matter--please take care of it as a friend's gift, and one I would not
+lose for its weight in gold. Please read first the Sermon by Bishop
+Jewel, page 14, and then the rest at your pleasure or your leisure.
+
+_No halls are wanted_, they are all rich men's excuses for destroying
+the home life of England.
+
+The public library should be at the village school (and I could put ten
+thousand pounds' worth of books into a single cupboard), and all that is
+done for education should be pure Gift. Do you think that this rich
+England, which spends fifty millions a year in drink and gunpowder,
+can't educate her poor without being paid interest for her Charity?
+
+ * * * * *
+
+At the time of writing this the following letters passed between Mr.
+Ruskin and myself:--
+
+
+
+
+ 16.
+
+
+ THE VICARAGE,
+ BROUGHTON-IN-FURNESS,
+ _September 12th, 1879_.
+
+MY DEAR MR. RUSKIN,--I feel in a great strait. I have before me a task
+of the utmost delicacy, and one before which I feel that I _ought_ to
+shrink,--that of editing your letters, with the accompaniment of
+comments of my own. You trust me, evidently, or you would have laid down
+limitations to guard yourself against misrepresentation. My anxiety is
+lest I should abuse that large and generous confidence you have so
+kindly placed in me. Let me explain my position, as I see it myself.
+
+The series will consist of eleven letters, when you have sent me your
+last. I have now copied nine, and written concisely the views I have
+presumed to form upon each. With every letter I mostly agree and
+sympathize, looking on them as "counsels of perfection," and viewing the
+great subjects you deal with from a far higher standpoint than (in my
+experience) either laymen or clergymen generally view them. All that
+there is in me of _enthusiasm_ rings in answering chords to the notes
+you strike. Yet I do not _always_ agree. But when I do disagree, I
+acknowledge it is because your standard is excessively high--too high
+for practical purposes.
+
+Now, I ask, shall you consider it strictly fair and honourable in me to
+receive your letters, read them or send them to assemblies of clergy,
+gather their views, both adverse and favourable, and add diffident
+animad-versions of my own? If you will allow this to be right, and if
+you will trust to my sense of what is proper, to deal with your letters
+in the spirit of a Christian and a gentleman, then, hoping to fulfil
+your expectations, I shall proceed in my work with a mind more at ease;
+for I could not endure the thought that, after all was done, I had
+written a single sentence or word that had inflicted pain upon you.
+
+Then comes another question. Do you wish to hear or read my comments
+before they are printed? I say frankly, if you trust me, I would prefer
+not; for it would not, perhaps, be pleasant for me either to read your
+praises, or my poor criticisms, to your face. But still, if you wish it,
+I shall be ready at your bidding; for I recognize your right to require
+it. Only I would rather read them to you myself some quiet autumn
+evening or two.
+
+
+
+
+ 17.
+
+
+ _September 13th._
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I am so very grateful for your proposal to edit the
+letters without further reference to me. I think that will be exactly
+the right way; and I believe I can put you at real ease in the doing of
+it by explaining as I can in very few words the kind of carte-blanche I
+should rejoicingly give you.
+
+Interrupted to-day! more to-morrow, with, I hope, the last letter.
+
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 18.
+
+
+ _Sunday, September 14th._
+
+I've nearly done the last letter, but will keep it to-morrow rather than
+finish hurriedly for the earlier post. Your nice little note has just
+come, and I can only say that you cannot please me better than by acting
+with perfect freedom in all ways, and that I only want to see or reply
+to what you wish me for the matter's sake. And surely there is no
+occasion for any thought for waste of type about _me_ personally, except
+only to express your knowledge of my real desire for the health and
+power of the Church. More than this praise you _must_ not give me, for
+I have learned almost everything I may say that I know by my errors.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 19.
+
+
+ _September 16th, 1879._
+
+I should have returned these two recent letters before now, but have
+been looking for the earlier letters which have got mislaid in a general
+rearrangement of all things by a new secretary. I am almost sure to come
+on them to-morrow in my own packing up for town, where I must be for a
+month hence. Please address, &c.
+
+
+
+
+ 20.
+
+
+ [_Undated._]
+
+I am sincerely grieved by the first part of your letter, and scarcely
+like to trouble you with answer to the close. * * * Surely the first
+thing to be done with the letters is to use them as you propose, and you
+may find fifty suggestions, made by persons or circumstances after that,
+worth considering. I do not doubt that I could easily add to the bulk of
+MS.; but should then, I think, stipulate for having the book published
+by my own publisher.
+
+
+
+
+ 21.
+
+
+ _October 13th._
+
+I did not get your kind and interesting letter till yesterday, and can
+only write in utter haste this morning to say that I think nothing can
+possibly be more satisfactory (to me personally at least) and more
+honourable than what you tell me of the wish of the meeting to have the
+letters printed for their quiet consideration.[29]
+
+ [29] Canon Rawnsley kindly offered to print them at his own
+ expense; only as many were printed as would be sufficient for three
+ or four clerical societies. Had I known how valuable those little
+ pamphlets were destined to become, I should have had many more
+ printed!--ED.
+
+They are entirely at your command and theirs--but don't sell the
+copyright to any publisher. Keep it in your own hands, and after
+expenses are paid of course any profits should go to the poor. Please
+write during this week to me at St. George's Museum, Walkley,
+Sheffield.
+
+
+
+
+ 22.
+
+
+ _From_ CANON FARRAR.
+
+ _October 29th, 1879._
+
+I am much obliged to you for your courtesy in sending me the letters. I
+am not, however, inclined to enter into any controversy, being painfully
+overwhelmed with the very duties which Mr. Ruskin seems to think that we
+don't do--looking after the material and religious interests of the
+sick, the suffering, the hungry, the drunken, and the extremely
+wretched.
+
+ Yours very truly,
+ F. W. FARRAR.
+
+
+
+
+ 23.
+
+
+ SHEFFIELD, _October 17th, 1879_.
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--I am sincerely interested and moved by your history
+of your laborious life--and shall be entirely glad to leave the
+completed volume as your property, provided always you sell it to no
+publisher--but take just percentage on the editions: and provided also
+that an edition be issued of the letters themselves in their present
+simple form of which the profits, if any, shall be for the poor of the
+district.[30] It would lower your position in the whole matter if it
+could be hinted that I had written the letters with any semi-purpose of
+serving my friend. On the other hand you will have just and honourable
+right to the profits of the completed edition which your labour and
+judgment will have made possible and guided into the most serviceable
+form.
+
+ [30] This, of course, with Mr. Allen's concurrence, is my
+ intention.--ED.
+
+I am thankful to see that the letters read clearly and easily, and
+contain all that it was in my mind to get said; that nothing can be
+possibly more right in every way than the printing and binding--nor more
+courteous and firm than your preface.
+
+Yes--there _will_ be a chasm to cross--a tauriformis
+Aufidus[31]--greater than Rubicon, and the roar of it for many a year
+has been heard in the distance, through the gathering fog on earth more
+loudly.
+
+ [31] Sic tauriformis volvitur Aufidus,
+ Qui regna Dauni praefluit Appuli
+ Quum saevit, horrendamque cultis
+ Diluviem meditatur agris.
+
+ --HOR. _Carm._ iv. 14.
+
+The River of Spiritual Death in this world--and entrance to Purgatory in
+the other, come down to us.
+
+When will the feet of the Priests be dipped in the still brim of the
+water? Jordan overflows his banks already.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+When you have got your large edition with its correspondence into form,
+I should like to read the sheets as they are issued, and put merely
+letters of reference, _a_, _b_, and _c_, to be taken up in a short
+epilogue. But I don't want to do or say anything till you have all in
+perfect readiness for publication. I should merely add my reference
+letters in the margin, and the shortest possible notes at the end.
+
+Please send me ten more of these private ones for my own friends.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 24.
+
+ _Extract of a Letter from the late_
+
+ MISS SUSANNA BEEVER.
+
+ ("The Younger Lady of the Thwaite, Coniston," to whom Mr. Ruskin
+ dedicated "Frondes Agrestes.")
+
+
+ _October 28th, 1879._
+
+DEAR MR. MALLESON,--My sister has asked me to write and thank you for
+two copies of Mr. Ruskin's Letters, which you have been so good as to
+send to her. It is curious that before the post came this morning I had
+been wondering whether I might ask you for a copy. * * * I have already
+read these deeply interesting Letters five times. They are like the
+"foam globes of leaven," I might say they have exercised my mind very
+much. Things in them which at first seemed rather startling, prove on
+closer examination to be full of deep truth. The suggestions in them
+lead to "great searchings of heart." There is much with which I entirely
+agree; much over which to ponder. What an insight into human nature is
+shown in the remark that though we are so ready to call ourselves
+"miserable sinners," we resent being accused of any special fault. * * *
+
+
+
+
+ 25.
+
+
+ _November 7th, 1879._
+
+I am so glad we understand each other now and that you will carry out
+your plan quietly.
+
+I think you should correct the present little book by my revise, and
+print enough for whatever private circulation the members of the meeting
+wish, but that it should not be made public till well after the large
+book is out. For which I shall look with deepest interest.
+
+
+
+
+ 26.
+
+
+ _November 19th, 1879._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I have not been able to answer a word lately, being
+quite unusually busy in France--and you never remember that it takes
+_me_ as long to write a chapter as you to write a book, and tries me
+more to do it--so that I am sick of the feel of a pen this many a day.
+I'm delighted to hear of your popularity,[32] being sure that all you
+advise people to do will be kind and right. I am not surprised at the
+popularity, but I wonder that you have not had some nasty envious
+reviews.[33]
+
+ [32] Meaning in the press notices of the Editor's "Life of
+ Christ."--ED.
+
+ [33] Seventeen _very good_, five _good_, five _fair_, six _bad_,
+ two _nasty, envious_!--ED.
+
+I like the impudence of these Scotch brats.[34] Do they suppose it would
+have been either pleasure or honour to me to come and lecture there? It
+is perhaps as much their luck as mine that they changed their minds
+about it. I shall be down at Brantwood soon (_D.V._). Poor Mr. Sly's[35]
+death is a much more troublous thing to me than Glasgow Elections.
+
+ [34] Glasgow University.
+
+ [35] Of the Waterhead, Coniston.
+
+
+
+
+ 27.
+
+
+ _January 5th, 1880._
+
+A Happy New Year to you. If I may judge or guess by the efforts made to
+draw me into the business, it is likely to be a busy one for you! Will
+you kindly now send me back my old book on Usury? I've got a letter
+(which for his lordship's sake had better never been written) from the
+Bishop of Manchester, and may want to quote a word or two of my back
+letter. I send the letter with my reply this month to the
+_Contemporary_.
+
+
+
+
+ 28.
+
+
+ _January 7th, 1880._
+
+So many thanks for your kind little note and the book which I have
+received quite safely; and many more thanks for taking all the enemies'
+fire off me and leaving me quiet. I've been all this morning at work on
+finches and buntings; but I must give the Bishop a turn to-morrow. This
+weather takes my little wits out of me wofully; but I am always
+affectionately yours,
+
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 29.
+
+
+ _May 10th, 1880._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--Yes, the omission of the 'Mr.' meant much change in
+all my feelings towards you and estimates of you--for which change,
+believe me, I am more glad and thankful than I can well tell you. Not
+but that of course I always felt your essential goodness and rightness
+of mind, but I did not at all understand the scope of them.
+
+And you will have the reward of the Visitation of the Sick, though every
+day I am more sure of the mistake made by good people universally--in
+trying to pull fallen people up--instead of keeping yet safe ones from
+tumbling after them, and always spending their pains on the worst
+instead of the best material. If they want to be able to save the lost
+like Christ, let them first be sure they can say with Him, "Of those
+Thou gavest Me I have lost none."
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+The 'Epilogue's' an awful bother to me in this May time! I have not done
+a word yet, but you shall have it before the week is out.
+
+
+
+
+ 30.
+
+
+ _April 17._
+
+The letters seem all very nice--I shall have very little to
+say about them, except to explain what you observe and have been
+misunderstood.... Of course my notes shall be sent to you and added to
+when you see need. But I cannot do it quickly.
+
+
+
+
+ 31.
+
+
+ _April 14, 1880._
+
+Thanks for nice new proofs. I haven't found any false references, but I
+didn't look. I'll have all verified by my secretary. I'm busy with an
+article on modern novels and don't feel a bit pious just now; so the
+responses have hung fire.
+
+
+
+
+ 32.
+
+
+ _May 9._
+
+You are really very good about this, and shall have the notes (_D.V._)
+within a fortnight. The Scott could not be put off, being promised for
+June 19, _Nineteenth Century_, and I could not do novels and sermons
+together. I don't think the notes will be long. The letters seem to be
+mostly compliments or small objections not worth noticing.
+
+
+
+
+ 33.
+
+
+ _May 14th, 1880._
+
+I've just done--yesterday with Scott, and took up the letters for the
+first time this morning seriously.
+
+I had never seen _yours_ at all when I wrote last. I fell first on Mr.
+----, whom I read with some attention, and commented on with little
+favour; went on to the next, and remained content with that taste till I
+had done my Scott.
+
+I have this morning been reading your own, on which I very earnestly
+congratulate you. God knows it isn't because they are friendly or
+complimentary, but because you _do_ see what I mean, and people hardly
+ever do--and I think it needs very considerable power and feeling to
+forgive and understand as you do. You have said everything _I_ want to
+say, and much more--except on the one point of excommunication, which
+will be the chief, almost the only subject of my final note.
+
+I write in haste to excuse myself for my former note.
+
+ Ever affectionately
+ and gratefully yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+(NOTE.--A legal friend remarks that in his opinion I should refrain from
+printing _extracts_ from letters, and always print the whole; or,
+indeed, in the present case, the whole series of letters, lest it should
+be suspected that I am making a self-indulgent selection only of the
+good words which Mr. Ruskin is kind enough to use in his communications
+with me. Let me here say, however, that had there been in all these
+letters any which conveyed censure, stricture, or blame of any kind, I
+should not have withheld my hand from including them. But no such
+letters ever came to me. Mr. Ruskin is the very pink of courtesy with
+his friends, and he _may_ have suppressed remarks which he thought might
+wound me. But I am reproducing here not my friend's secret thoughts, but
+only those of his letters which remain in my possession.--EDITOR.)
+
+
+
+
+ 34.
+
+
+ _May 26th, 1880._
+
+I'm at work on the 'Epilogue,' but it takes more trouble than I
+expected. I see there's a letter from you which I leave unopened, for
+fear there should be anything in it to put me in a bad temper, which you
+might easily do without meaning it. You shall have the 'Epilogue' as
+soon as I can get it done; but you won't much like it, for there are
+bits in the Clergymen's letters that have put my bristles up. They ought
+either to have said nothing about me, or known more.
+
+I should give that rascally Bishop a dressing "au serieux," only you
+wouldn't like to godfather it, so I'll keep it for somewhere else.[36]
+
+ [36] Needless to say that in this energetic language, the Master of
+ the Company of St. George is referring to nothing whatever in the
+ stainless character of the great Bishop, of whom it is justly
+ recorded in the inscription on his monument in Manchester Cathedral
+ that "he won all hearts by opening to them his own;" except only in
+ the matter of house-rent and interest of money, opinions which the
+ Bishop shared with the great mass of civilized humanity.
+
+
+
+
+
+ 35.
+
+
+ _June 7th, 1880._
+
+Your letter is a relief to my mind, and shall not be taken advantage of
+for more delay. The wet day or two would get all done: but I simply
+can't think of anything but the sun while it shines.
+
+And I've had second, third, and seventh thoughts about several things:
+as it is coming out I believe it will be a useful contribution to the
+book.
+
+I shall get it in the copyist's hand on Monday, and as it's one of my
+girl secretaries, I shall be teased till it's done, so it's safe for the
+end of the week (_D.V._). I am sadly afraid she'll make me cut out some
+of the spiciest bits: the girl secretaries are always allowed to put
+their pens through anything they choose. Please drop the 'Mr.'; it is a
+matter of friendship, not as if there were any of different powers. God
+only knows of higher and lower, and, as far as I can judge, is likely to
+put ministry to the sick much above public letters.
+
+Thanks for note of Menyanthes Trifoliata.
+
+I haven't seen it, scarcely moving at present beyond my wood or garden.
+
+
+
+
+ 36.
+
+
+ _June 13th, 1880._
+
+You are really very good to put up with all that vicious Epilogue. But
+it won't discredit _you_ in the end, whatever it may do me. I hope much
+otherwise.
+
+I will send you to-morrow the Lincoln, or, possibly, York MS. to look
+at. You will find the Litany following the Quicunque vult, and on the
+leaf marked by me 83, at the top the passage I began quotation with. It
+will need a note; for _domptnum_ is, I believe, strong Yorkshire Latin
+for Donum Apostolicum, not Dominum.
+
+The _e_ in Ecclesie for _ae_ is the proper form in medieval Latin.
+
+The calendar and Litany are invaluable in their splendid lists of
+English saints, and the entire book unreplaceable, so mind you lock it
+up carefully!
+
+
+
+
+ 37.
+
+
+There's a good deal of interest in the enclosed layman's letter, I
+think. Would you like to print any bits of it? I cannot quite make up my
+mind if it's worth or not.
+
+
+
+
+ 38.
+
+
+ _June 27th, 1880._
+
+The 'Epilogue' is all but done to-day, and shall be sent by railway
+guard to-morrow (_D.V._), with a book which will further interest you
+and your good secretary. It is as fine an example of the coloured print
+Prayer-Book as I have seen, date 1507, and full of examples of the way
+Romanism had ruined itself at that date. But it may contain in legible
+form some things of interest. I never could make out so much as its
+Calendar; but the songs about the saints and rhymed hours are very
+pretty. Though the illuminations are all ridiculous and one or two
+frightful, most are more or less pretty, and nearly all interesting. You
+can keep it any time, but you must promise me not to show it to anybody
+who does not know how to handle a book. * * *
+
+(NOTE.--I may mention here, once for all, that wherever there are
+omissions left in Mr. Ruskin's letters, there is nothing of interest or
+importance in those passages for any one but for the receiver of that
+letter.)
+
+
+
+
+ 39.
+
+
+ _July 15th, 1880._
+
+* * * It is a further light to me, on your curious differences from most
+clergymen, very wonderful and venerable to me, that you should
+understand Byron!
+
+
+
+
+ 40.
+
+
+ _June 25th._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--No, I don't want the letter printed in the least; but
+it ought to have interested you very differently. It is by a much older
+man than I, who has never heard of our letters, but has been a very
+useful and influential person in his own parish, and is a practical and
+acceptable contributor to sporting papers. He is an able lawyer also,
+and knows far better than I do and far better than most clergymen know,
+what could really be done in their country parishes if they had a mind.
+
+The bit of manuscript is perfectly fac-similed by your niece, but I
+can't read it: and it will be much better that you mark the places you
+wish certification about, and that I then send the book up to the
+British Museum, and have the whole made clear. The _dompt_ is a very
+important matter indeed.
+
+I have got the last bit of epilogue fairly on foot this morning, and
+can promise it on Monday all well.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 41.
+
+
+ _April 30th, 1881._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--It will be many a day before I recover yet--if ever--but
+with caution I hope not to go wild again, and to get what power belongs
+to my age slowly back. When were you in the same sort of danger? Let me
+very strongly warn you from the whirlpool edge--the going down in the
+middle is gloomier than I can tell you.
+
+But I shall thankfully see you and your friend here. Visiting is out of
+the question for me. I can bear no fatigue nor excitement away from my
+home. I pay visits no more--anywhere (even in old times few). It is
+always a great gladness to me when young students care about old
+books--and I remember as a duty the feeling I used to have in getting a
+Missal, even after I was past a good many other pleasures. You made such
+good use of that book too, that I am happy in yielding to any wish of
+yours about it, so your young friend[37] shall have it if he likes. The
+marked price is quite a fair market one for it, though you might look
+and wait long before such a book came _into_ the market. The British
+Museum people were hastily and superciliously wrong in calling it a
+common book. It is not a _showy_ one; but there are few more interesting
+or more perfect service books in English manuscript, and the Museum
+people buy cart-loads of big folios that are not worth the shelf room.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ [37] Rev. J. R. Haslam, now Vicar of Thwaites, Cumberland. See
+ Appendix.--ED.
+
+
+
+
+ 42.
+
+
+ _April 23rd, 1881._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--These passages of description and illustration of the
+general aspect of Ephesus in St. Paul's time seem to me much more
+forcibly and artistically written than anything you did in the "Life of
+Christ"; and I could not suggest any changes to you which you could now
+carry out under the conditions of time to revise, except a more clear
+statement of the Ephesian goddess.
+
+[I really do not think Mr. Ruskin would wish that _all_ he wrote in the
+next sentence about the Ephesian Diana should be placed before the
+public eye. But I resume in the middle of a sentence.]
+
+... practically at last and chiefly of the Diabolic Suction of the
+Usurer; and her temple, which you luckily liken to the Bank of England,
+was in fact what that establishment would be as the recognised place of
+pious pilgrimage for all Jews, infidels, or prostitutes in the realm of
+England. You could not conceive the real facts of these degraded
+worships of the mixed Greek and Asiatic races, unless you gave a good
+year's work to the study of the decline of Greek art in the 3rd and 4th
+centuries B.C.
+
+Charles Newton's pride in discovering Mausolus, and engineers' whistling
+over his Asiatic mummy, have entirely corrupted and thwarted the uses
+of the British Museum Art Galleries. The Drum of that Diana Temple is
+barbarous rubbish, not worth tenpence a ton; and if I shewed you a
+photograph of the head of Mausolus without telling you what it was, I
+will undertake that you saw with candid eyes in it nothing more than the
+shaggy poll of a common gladiator. But your book will swim with the
+tide. It is best so.
+
+
+
+
+ 43.
+
+
+ _July...._
+
+I'm not in the least anxious about my MS., and shall only be glad if you
+like to keep it long enough to read thoroughly. There must surely be
+published copies of such extant, though, and worth enquiring after?
+
+Partly the fine weather, partly the heat, partly a fit of Scott and
+Byron have stopped the Epilogue utterly for the time! You cannot be in
+any hurry for it surely? There's plenty to go on printing with.
+
+I don't think you will find the n's and m's much bother; the
+contractions are the great nuisance. But I do think this development of
+Gothic writing one of the oddest absurdities of mankind.
+
+The illumination of "the fool hath said in his heart," snapping his
+fingers, or more accurately making the indecent sign called "the fig" by
+the Italians, is a very unusual one in this MS., and peculiarly English.
+
+
+
+
+ 44.
+
+
+There is not the least use in my looking over these sheets: you
+probably know more about Athens than I do, and what I do know is out of
+and in Smith's Dictionary, where you can find it without trouble.
+
+For the rest you must please always remember what I told you once for
+all, that you could never interest _me_ by writing about people, either
+at Athens or Ephesus, but only of those of the parish of
+Broughton-in-Furness.
+
+That new translation could not come out well; that much I know without
+looking at it. One must believe the Bible before one understands it, (I
+mean, believe that it is understandable) and one must understand before
+one can translate it. Two stages in advance of your Twenty-Four
+Co-operative Tyndales!
+
+
+
+
+ 45.
+
+
+ _26th May._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--I should be delighted to see Canon Weston and you any
+day: but I want J---- to be at home, and she is going to town next week
+for a month, and will be fussy till she goes. She promises to be back
+faithfully within the week after that--within the Sunday, I mean. Fix
+any day or any choice of days if one is wet after the said Sunday, and
+we shall both be in comfort ready.
+
+If Canon Weston or you are going away anywhere, come any day before that
+suits you.
+
+In divinity matters I am obliged to stop--for my sins, I suppose. But it
+seems I am almost struck mad when I think earnestly about them, and I'm
+only reading now natural history or nature.
+
+Never mind Autograph people, they are never worth the scratch of a pen.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. R.
+
+
+
+
+ 46.
+
+
+ _August 26th, 1881._
+
+I'm in furious bad humour with the weather, and cannot receive just now
+at all, having had infinitely too much of indoors, and yet unable to
+draw for darkness, or write for temper. But I will see Mr. ---- if he
+has any other reason than curiosity for wishing to see me--what does he
+want with me?
+
+
+
+
+ 47.
+
+
+ _21st October._
+
+I am fairly well, but have twenty times the work in hand that I am able
+for; and read--Virgil, Plato, and Hesoid, when I have time! But
+assuredly no modern books; least of all my friends', lest I should have
+either to flatter or offend. Still less will I have to say to young men
+proposing to become clergymen. I have distinctly told them their
+business is at present--to dig, not preach.
+
+Let your young friend read his Fors. All that he needs of me is in that.
+
+
+
+
+ 48.
+
+
+ ANNECY, SAVOY,
+ _November 15th, 1882._
+
+I have got your kind little note of the 11th yesterday, and am entirely
+glad to hear of your papers on the Duddon. I shall be very happy indeed
+if you find any pleasure in remembering our walk to the tarn.[38] I hope
+I know now better how to manage myself in all ways, and we may still
+have some pleasant talks, my health not failing me.
+
+ [38] Goat's Water, under the Old Man of Coniston.
+
+
+
+
+ 49.
+
+
+ TALLOIRE, SWITZERLAND,
+ _November 20th, 1882._
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I am sincerely grieved that you begin to feel the
+effect of overwork; but as this is the first warning you have had, and
+as you are wise enough to obey it, I trust that the three months' rest
+will restore you all your usual powers on the conditions of using them
+with discretion, and not rising to write at two in the morning.
+
+I am very thankful to find in my own case that a quiet spring of energy
+filters back into the old well-heads--if one does not bucket it out as
+fast as it comes in.
+
+But my last illnesses seriously impaired my walking powers, and I'm
+afraid if you came to Switzerland I should be very jealous of you.
+
+Certainly it is not in this season a country for an invalid, and I
+believe you cannot be safer than by English firesides with no books to
+work at nor parishioners to visit.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 50.
+
+
+ _January 22nd, 1883._
+
+DEAR MALLESON,--I am heartily glad to hear that you are better, and that
+you are going to lead the Vicar of Wakefield's quiet life. I am not
+stronger myself, but think it right to keep hold of the Oxford Helm, as
+long as they care to trust it to me.
+
+I've entirely given up reviewing, but if the Editor of the
+_Contemporary_ would send me Mr. Peek's Article, when set up, I might
+perhaps send a note or two on it, which the real reviewer might use or
+not at his pleasure. In the meantime it would greatly oblige me if the
+Editor could give me the reference to an old article of mine on Herbert
+Spencer, (or at least on a saying of his), which I cannot find where I
+thought it was in the _Nineteenth Century_, and suppose therefore to
+have been in the _Contemporary_ before the _Nineteenth Century_ Athena
+arose out of its cleft head.
+
+The Article had a lot about Coniston in it, but I quite forget what else
+it was about. I think it must have been just before the separation.
+Kindest regards and congratulations on your convalescence from all here.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ 51.
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _February 6th, 1883_.
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I'm nearly beside myself with a sudden rush of work
+on my return from abroad, and resumption of Oxford duties, and I simply
+_cannot_ yet think over the business of the letters, the rather that _I_
+certainly never would re-publish most of those clergymen's letters at
+all.
+
+My own were a gift to you, and I am quite ready to print _them_ if you
+like, and let you have half profits, the St. George's Guild having the
+other. But that could not be for some time yet.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ EPILOGUE BY MR. RUSKIN
+
+
+ BRANTWOOD, CONISTON, _June 1880_.
+
+MY DEAR MALLESON,--I have glanced at the proofs you send; and _can_ do
+no more than glance, even if it seemed to me desirable that I should do
+more,--which, after said glance, it does in no wise. Let me remind you
+of what it is absolutely necessary that the readers of the book should
+clearly understand--that I wrote these Letters at your request, to be
+read and discussed at the meeting of a private society of clergymen. I
+declined then to be present at the discussion, and I decline still. You
+afterwards asked leave to print the Letters, to which I replied that
+they were yours, for whatever use you saw good to make of them:
+afterwards your plans expanded, while my own notion remained precisely
+what it had been--that the discussion should have been private, and kept
+within the limits of the society, and that its conclusions, if any,
+should have been announced in a few pages of clear print, for the
+parishioners' exclusive reading.
+
+I am, of course, flattered by the wider course you have obtained for the
+Letters, but am not in the slightest degree interested by the debate
+upon them, nor by any religious debates whatever, undertaken without
+serious conviction that there is a jot wrong in matters as they are, or
+serious resolution to make them a tittle better. Which, so far as I can
+read the minds of your correspondents, appears to me the substantial
+state of them.
+
+One thing I cannot pass without protest--the quantity of talk about the
+writer of the Letters. What I am, or am not, is of no moment whatever to
+the matters in hand. I observe with comfort, or at least with
+complacency, that on the strength of a couple of hours' talk, at a time
+when I was thinking chiefly of the weatherings of slate you were good
+enough to show me above Goat's Water, you would have ventured to baptize
+me in the little lake--as not a goat, but a sheep. The best I can be
+sure of, myself, is that I am no wolf, and have never aspired to the
+dignity even of a Dog of the Lord.
+
+You told me, if I remember rightly, that one of the members of the
+original meeting denounced me as an arch-heretic[39]--meaning,
+doubtless, an arch-pagan; for a heretic, or sect-maker, is of all terms
+of reproach the last that can be used of me. And I think he should have
+been answered that it was precisely as an arch-pagan that I ventured to
+request a more intelligible and more unanimous account of the Christian
+Gospel from its preachers.
+
+ [39] Only a heretic!--ED.
+
+If anything in the Letters offended those of you who hold me a brother,
+surely it had been best to tell me between ourselves, or to tell it to
+the Church, or to let me be Anathema Maranatha in peace,--in any case, I
+must at present so abide, correcting only the mistakes about myself
+which have led to graver ones about the things I wanted to speak of.[40]
+
+ [40] I may perhaps be pardoned for vindicating at least my
+ arithmetic, which, with Bishop Colenso, I rather pride myself upon.
+ One of your correspondents greatly doubts my having heard five
+ thousand assertors of evangelical principles (Catholic-absolvent or
+ Protestant-detergent are virtually the same). I am now sixty years
+ old, and for forty-five of them was in church at least once on the
+ Sunday,--say once a month also in afternoons,--and you have above
+ three thousand church services. When I am abroad I am often in
+ half-a-dozen churches in the course of a single day, and never lose
+ a chance of listening to anything that is going on. Add the
+ conversations pursued, not unearnestly, with every sort of reverend
+ person I can get to talk to me--from the Bishop of Strasburg (as
+ good a specimen of a town bishop as I have known), with whom I was
+ studying ecstatic paintings in the year 1850--down to the simplest
+ travelling tinker inclined Gospelwards, whom I perceive to be
+ sincere, and your correspondent will perceive that my rapid
+ numerical expression must be far beneath the truth. He subjoins his
+ more rational doubt of my acquaintance with many town missionaries;
+ to which I can only answer, that as I do not live in town, nor set
+ up for a missionary myself, my spiritual advantages have certainly
+ not been great in that direction. I simply assert that of the few I
+ have known,--beginning with Mr. Spurgeon, under whom I sat with
+ much edification for a year or two,--I have not known any such
+ teaching as I speak of.
+
+The most singular one, perhaps, in all the Letters is that of Mr. ----,
+that I do not attach enough weight to antiquity. My reply to it is
+partly written already, with reference to the wishes of some other of
+your correspondents to know more of my reasons for finding fault with
+the English Liturgy.
+
+If people are taught to use the Liturgy rightly and reverently, it will
+bring them all good; and for some thirty years of my life I used to read
+it always through to my servant and myself, if we had no Protestant
+church to go to, in Alpine or Italian villages. One can always tacitly
+pray of it what one wants, and let the rest pass. But, as I have grown
+older, and watched the decline in the Christian faith of all nations, I
+have got more and more suspicious of the effect of this particular form
+of words on the truthfulness of the English mind (now fast becoming a
+salt which has lost his savour, and is fit only to be trodden under
+foot of men). And during the last ten years, in which my position at
+Oxford has compelled me to examine what authority there was for the code
+of prayer, of which the University is now so ashamed that it no more
+dares compel its youths so much as to hear, much less to utter it, I got
+necessarily into the habit of always looking to the original forms of
+the prayers of the fully developed Christian Church. Nor did I think it
+a mere chance which placed in my own possession a manuscript of the
+perfect Church service of the thirteenth century,[41] written by the
+monks of the Sainte Chapelle for St. Louis; together with one of the
+same date, written in England, probably for the Diocese of Lincoln;
+adding some of the Collects, in which it corresponds with St. Louis's,
+and the Latin hymns so much beloved by Dante, with the appointed music
+for them.
+
+ [41] See Appendix.
+
+And my wonder has been greater every hour, since I examined closely the
+text of these and other early books, that in any state of declining, or
+captive, energy, the Church of England should have contented itself with
+a service which cast out, from beginning to end, all these intensely
+spiritual and passionate utterances of chanted prayer (the whole body,
+that is to say, of the authentic _Christian_ Psalms), and in adopting
+what it timidly preserved of the Collects, mangled or blunted them down
+to the exact degree which would make them either unintelligible or
+inoffensive--so vague that everybody might use them, or so pointless
+that nobody could be offended by them. For a special instance: The
+prayer for "our bishops and curates, and all congregations committed to
+their charge," is, in the Lincoln Service-book, "for our bishop, and all
+congregations committed to _his_ charge." The change from singular to
+plural seems a slight one. But it suffices to take the eyes of the
+people off their own bishop into infinite space; to change a prayer
+which was intended to be uttered in personal anxiety and affection, into
+one for the general good of the Church, of which nobody could judge, and
+for which nobody would particularly care; and, finally, to change a
+prayer to which the answer, if given, would be visible, into one of
+which nobody could tell whether it were answered or not.
+
+In the Collects, the change, though verbally slight, is thus tremendous
+in issue. But in the Litany--word and thought go all wild together. The
+first prayer of the Litany in the Lincoln Service-book is for the Pope
+and all ranks beneath him, implying a very noteworthy piece of
+theology--that the Pope might err in religious matters, and that the
+prayer of the humblest servant of God would be useful to him:--"Ut
+Dompnum Apostolicum, et omnes gradus ecclesie in sancta religione
+conservare digneris." Meaning that whatever errors particular persons
+might, and must, fall into, they prayed God to keep the Pope right, and
+the collective testimony and conduct of the ranks below him. Then
+follows the prayer for their own bishop and _his_ flock--then for the
+king and the princes (chief lords), that they (not all nations) might be
+kept in concord--and then for _our_ bishops and abbots,--the Church of
+England proper; every one of these petitions being direct, limited, and
+personally heartfelt;--and then this lovely one for themselves:--
+
+"Ut obsequium servitutis nostre rationabile facias."--"That thou wouldst
+make the obedience of our service reasonable" ("which is your reasonable
+service").[42]
+
+ [42] See in the Appendix for more of these beautiful prayers.--ED.
+
+This glorious prayer is, I believe, accurately an "early English" one.
+It is not in the St. Louis Litany, nor in a later elaborate French
+fourteenth century one; but I find it softened in an Italian MS. of the
+fifteenth century into "ut nosmet ipsos in tuo sancto servitio
+confortare et conservare digneris,"--"that thou wouldst deign to keep
+and comfort us ourselves in thy sacred service" (the comfort, observe,
+being here asked for whether reasonable or not!); and in the best and
+fullest French service-book I have, printed at Rouen in 1520, it
+becomes, "ut congregationes omnium sanctorum in tuo sancto servitio
+conservare digneris;" while victory as well as concord is asked for the
+king and the princes,--thus leading the way to that for our own Queen's
+victory over all her enemies, a prayer which might now be advisedly
+altered into one that she--and in her, the monarchy of England--might
+find more fidelity in their friends.
+
+I give one more example of the corruption of our Prayer-Book, with
+reference to the objections taken by some of your correspondents to the
+distinction implied in my Letters between the Persons of the Father and
+the Christ.
+
+The "Memoria de Sancta Trinitate," in the St. Louis service-book, runs
+thus:
+
+"Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, qui dedisti famulis tuis in confessione
+vere fidei eterne Trinitatis gloriam agnoscere, et in potentia
+majestatis adorare unitatem, quesumus ut ejus fidei firmitate ab omnibus
+semper muniemur adversis. Qui vivis et regnas Deus, per omnia secula
+seculorum. Amen."
+
+"Almighty and everlasting God, who hast given to Thy servants, in
+confession of true faith to recognize the glory of the Eternal Trinity,
+and in the power of Majesty to pray to the Unity; we ask that by the
+firmness of that faith we may be always defended from all adverse
+things, who livest and reignest God through all ages. Amen."
+
+Turning to our Collect, we find we have first slipped in the word "us"
+before "Thy servants," and by that little insertion have slipped in the
+squire and his jockey, and the public-house landlord--and any one else
+who may chance to have been coaxed, swept, or threatened into church on
+Trinity Sunday, and required the entire company of them to profess
+themselves servants of God, and believers in the mystery of the Trinity.
+And we think we have done God a service!
+
+"Grace." Not a word about grace in the original. You don't believe by
+having grace, but by having wit.
+
+"To acknowledge." "Agnosco" is to recognize, not to acknowledge. To
+_see_ that there are three lights in a chandelier is a great deal more
+than to acknowledge that they are there.
+
+"To worship." "Adorare" is to pray to, not to worship. You may worship a
+mere magistrate; but you _pray_ to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
+
+The last sentence in the English is too horribly mutilated to be dealt
+with in any patience. The meaning of the great old collect is that by
+the shield of that faith we may quench all the fiery darts of the devil.
+The English prayer means, if it means anything, "Please keep us in our
+faith without our taking any trouble; and, besides, please don't let us
+lose our money, nor catch cold."
+
+"Who livest and reignest." Right; but how many of any extant or instant
+congregations understand what the two words mean? That God is a living
+God, not a dead Law; and that He is a reigning God, putting wrong things
+to rights, and that, sooner or later, with a strong hand and a rod of
+iron; and not at all with a soft sponge and warm water, washing
+everybody as clean as a baby every Sunday morning, whatever dirty work
+they may have been about all the week.
+
+On which latter supposition your modern Liturgy, in so far as it has
+supplemented instead of corrected the old one, has entirely modelled
+itself,--producing in its first address to the congregation before the
+Almighty precisely the faultfullest and foolishest piece of English
+language that I know in the whole compass of English or American
+literature. In the seventeen lines of it (as printed in my
+old-fashioned, large-print prayer-book), there are seven times over two
+words for one idea.
+
+ 1. Acknowledge and confess.
+ 2. Sins and wickedness.
+ 3. Dissemble nor cloke.
+ 4. Goodness and mercy.
+ 5. Assemble and meet.
+ 6. Requisite and necessary.
+ 7. Pray and beseech.
+
+There is, indeed, a shade of difference in some of these ideas for a
+good scholar, none for a general congregation;[43] and what difference
+they can guess at merely muddles their heads: to acknowledge sin is
+indeed different from confessing it, but it cannot be done at a minute's
+notice; and goodness is a different thing from mercy, but it is by no
+means God's infinite goodness that forgives our badness, but that judges
+it.
+
+ [43] The only explanation ever offered for this exuberant wordiness
+ is that if worshippers did not understand one term they would the
+ other, and in some cases, in the Exhortation and elsewhere, one
+ word is of Latin and the other of Saxon derivation.[44] But this is
+ surely a very feeble excuse for bad composition. Of a very
+ different kind is that beautiful climax which is reached in the
+ three admirably chosen pairs of words in the Prayer for the
+ Parliament, "peace and happiness, truth and justice, religion and
+ piety."--EDITOR.
+
+ [44] The repetition of synonymous terms is of very frequent
+ occurrence in sixteenth century writing, as "for ever and aye,"
+ "Time and the hour ran through the roughest day" (Macbeth, i. 3).
+
+"The faultfullest," I said, "and the foolishest." After using fourteen
+words where seven would have done, what is it that the whole speech
+gets said with its much speaking? This Morning Service of all England
+begins with the assertion that the Scripture moveth us in sundry places
+to confess our sins before God. _Does_ it so? Have your congregations
+ever been referred to those sundry places? Or do they take the assertion
+on trust, or remain under the impression that, unless with the advantage
+of their own candour, God must remain ill-informed on the subject of
+their sins?
+
+"That we should not dissemble nor cloke them." _Can_ we then? Are these
+grown-up congregations of the enlightened English Church in the
+nineteenth century still so young in their nurseries that the "Thou,
+God, seest me" is still not believed by them if they get under the bed?
+
+Let us look up the sundry moving passages referred to.
+
+(I suppose myself a simple lamb of the flock, and only able to use my
+English Bible.)
+
+I find in my concordance (confess and confession together) forty-two
+occurrences of the word. Sixteen of these, including John's confession
+that he was not the Christ, and the confession of the faithful fathers
+that they were pilgrims on the earth, do indeed move us strongly to
+confess Christ before men. Have you ever taught your congregations what
+that confession means? They are ready enough to confess Him in church,
+that is to say, in their own private synagogue. Will they in Parliament?
+Will they in a ball-room? Will they in a shop? Sixteen of the texts are
+to enforce their doing _that_.
+
+The next most important one (1 Tim. vi. 13) refers to Christ's own good
+confession, which I suppose was not of His sins, but of His obedience.
+How many of your congregations can make any such kind of confession, or
+wish to make it?
+
+The eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth (1 Kings viii. 33, 2 Chron.
+vi. 26, Heb. xiii. 15) speak of confessing thankfully that God is God
+(and not a putrid plasma nor a theory of development), and the
+twenty-first (Job xl. 14) speaks of God's own confession, that no doubt
+we are the people, and that wisdom shall die with us, and on what
+conditions He will make it.
+
+There remain twenty-one texts which do speak of the confession of our
+sins--very moving ones indeed--and Heaven grant that some day the
+British public may be moved by them.
+
+1. The first is Lev. v. 5, "He shall confess that he hath sinned _in
+that thing_." And if you can get any soul of your congregation to say he
+has sinned in _any_thing, he may do it in two words for one if he likes,
+and it will yet be good liturgy.
+
+2. The second is indeed general--Lev. xvi. 21: the command that the
+whole nation should afflict its soul on the great day of atonement once
+a year. The Church of England, I believe, enjoins no such unpleasant
+ceremony. Her festivals are passed by her people often indeed in the
+extinction of their souls, but by no means in their intentional
+affliction.
+
+3. The third, fourth, and fifth (Lev. xxvi. 40, Numb. v. 7, Nehem. i. 6)
+refer all to national humiliation for definite idolatry, accompanied
+with an entire abandonment of that idolatry, and of idolatrous persons.
+How soon _that_ form of confession is likely to find a place in the
+English congregations the defences of their main idol, mammon, in the
+vilest and cruellest shape of it--usury--with which this book has been
+defiled, show very sufficiently.
+
+6. The sixth is Psalm xxxii. 5--virtually the whole of that psalm, which
+does, indeed, entirely refer to the greater confession, once for all
+opening the heart to God, which can be by no means done fifty-two times
+a year, and which, once done, puts men into a state in which they will
+never again say there is no health in them; nor that their hearts are
+desperately wicked; but will obey for ever the instantly following
+order, "Rejoice in the Lord, ye righteous, and shout for joy, all ye
+that are true of heart."
+
+7. The seventh is the one confession in which I can myself
+share:--"After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the Lord
+God of my fathers."
+
+8. The eighth, James v. 16, tells us to confess our faults--not to God,
+but "one to another"--a practice not favoured by English
+catechumens--(by the way, what _do_ you all mean by "auricular"
+confession--confession that can be heard? and is the Protestant
+pleasanter form one that can't be?)
+
+9. The ninth is that passage of St. John (i. 9), the favourite
+evangelical text, which is read and preached by thousands of false
+preachers every day, without once going on to read its great companion,
+"Beloved, if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and
+knoweth all things; but if our heart condemn us _not_, then have we
+confidence toward God." Make your people understand the second text, and
+they will understand the first. At present you leave them understanding
+neither.
+
+And the entire body of the remaining texts is summed in Joshua vii. 19
+and Ezra x. 11, in which, whether it be Achan, with his Babylonish
+garment, or the people of Israel, with their Babylonish lusts, the
+meaning of confession is simply what it is to every brave boy, girl,
+man, and woman, who knows the meaning of the word "honour" before God or
+man--namely, to say what they have done wrong, and to take the
+punishment of it (not to get it blanched over by any means), and to do
+it no more--which is so far from being a tone of mind generally enforced
+either by the English, or any other extant Liturgy, that, though all my
+maids are exceedingly pious, and insist on the privilege of going to
+church as a quite inviolable one, I think it a scarcely to be hoped for
+crown and consummation of virtue in them that they should tell me when
+they have broken a plate; and I should expect to be met only with looks
+of indignation and astonishment if I ventured to ask one of them how she
+had spent her Sunday afternoon.
+
+"Without courage," said Sir Walter Scott, "there is no truth; and
+without truth there is no virtue." The sentence would have been itself
+more true if Sir Walter had written "candour" for "truth," for it is
+possible to be true in insolence, or true in cruelty. But in looking
+back from the ridges of the Hill Difficulty in my own past life, and in
+all the vision that has been given me of the wanderings in the ways of
+others--this, of all principles, has become to me surest--that the first
+virtue to be required of man is frankness of heart and lip: and I
+believe that every youth of sense and honour, putting himself to
+faithful question, would feel that he had the devil for confessor, if he
+had not his father or his friend.
+
+That a clergyman should ever be so truly the friend of his parishioners
+as to deserve their confidence from childhood upwards, may be flouted as
+a sentimental ideal; but he is assuredly only their enemy in showing his
+Lutheran detestation of the sale of indulgences by broadcasting these
+gratis from his pulpit.
+
+The inconvenience and unpleasantness of a catechism concerning itself
+with the personal practice as well as the general theory of duty, are
+indeed perfectly conceivable by me; yet I am not convinced that such
+manner of catechism would therefore be less medicinal; and during the
+past ten years it has often been matter of amazed thought with me, while
+our President at Corpus read prayers to the chapel benches, what might
+by this time have been the effect on the learning as well as the creed
+of the University, if, forty years ago, our stern old Dean Gaisford, of
+the House of Christ, instead of sending us to chapel as to the house of
+correction, when we missed a lecture, had inquired, before he allowed us
+to come to chapel at all, whether we were gamblers, harlot-mongers, or
+in concealed and selfish debt.
+
+I observe with extreme surprise in the preceding letters the
+unconsciousness of some of your correspondents, that there ever was such
+a thing as discipline in the Christian Church. Indeed, the last
+wholesome instance of it I can remember was when my own great-great
+uncle Maitland lifted Lady ---- from his altar rails, and led her back
+to her seat before the congregation, when she offered to take the
+Sacrament, being at enmity with her son.[45] But I believe a few hours
+honestly spent by any clergyman on his Church history would show him
+that the Church's confidence in her prayer has been always exactly
+proportionate to the strictness of her discipline; that her present
+fright at being caught praying by a chemist or an electrician, results
+mainly from her having allowed her twos and threes gathered in the name
+of Christ to become sixes and sevens gathered in the name of Belial;
+and that therefore her now needfullest duty is to explain to her
+stammering votaries, extremely doubtful as they are of the effect of
+their supplications either on politics or the weather, that although
+Elijah was a man subject to like passions as we are, he had them better
+under command; and that while the effectual fervent prayer of a
+righteous man availeth much, the formal and lukewarm one of an
+iniquitous man availeth--much the other way.
+
+ [45] In some of the country districts of Scotland the right of the
+ Church to interfere with the lives of private individuals is still
+ exercised. Only two years ago, a wealthy gentleman farmer was
+ rebuked by the "Kirk Session" of the Dissenting Church to which he
+ belonged, for infidelity to his wife.
+
+ At the Scottish half-yearly Communion the ceremony of "fencing the
+ tables" used to be observed; that is, turning away all those whose
+ lives were supposed to have made them unfit to receive the
+ Sacrament.
+
+Such an instruction, coupled with due explanation of the nature of
+righteousness and iniquity, directed mainly to those who have the power
+of both in their own hands, being makers of law, and holders of
+property, would, without any further debate, bring about a very singular
+change in the position and respectability of English clergymen.
+
+How far they may at present be considered as merely the Squire's left
+hand, bound to know nothing of what he is doing with his right, it is
+for their own consciences to determine.
+
+For instance, a friend wrote to me the other day, "Will you not come
+here? You will see a noble duke destroying a village as old as the
+Conquest, and driving out dozens of families whose names are in Domesday
+Book, because, owing to the neglect of his ancestors and rackrenting for
+a hundred years, the place has fallen out of repair, and the people are
+poor, and may become paupers. A local paper ventured to tell the truth.
+The duke's agent called on the editor, and threatened him with
+destruction if he did not hold his tongue." The noble duke, doubtless,
+has proper Protestant horror of auricular confession. But suppose,
+instead of the local editor, the local parson had ventured to tell the
+truth from his pulpit, and even to intimate to his Grace that he might
+no longer receive the Body and Blood of the Lord at the altar of that
+parish. The parson would scarcely--in these days--have been therefore
+made bonfire of, and had a pretty martyr's memorial by Mr. Scott's
+pupils; but he would have lighted a goodly light, nevertheless, in this
+England of ours, whose pettifogging piety has now neither the courage to
+deny a duke's grace in its church, nor to declare Christ's in its
+Parliament.
+
+Lastly. Several of your contributors, I observe, have rashly dipped
+their feet in the brim of the water of that raging question of Usury;
+and I cannot but express my extreme regret that you should yourself have
+yielded to the temptation of expressing opinions which you have had no
+leisure either to found or to test. My assertion, however, that the rich
+lived mainly by robbing the poor, referred not to Usury, but to Rent;
+and the facts respecting both these methods of extortion are perfectly
+and indubitably ascertainable by any person who himself wishes to
+ascertain them, and is able to take the necessary time and pains. I see
+no sign, throughout the whole of these letters, of any wish whatever, on
+the part of one of their writers, to ascertain the facts, but only to
+defend practices which they hold to be convenient in the world, and are
+afraid to blame in their congregations. Of the presumption with which
+several of the writers utter their notions on the subject, I do not
+think it would be right to speak farther, in an epilogue to which there
+is no reply, in the terms which otherwise would have been deserved. In
+their bearing on other topics, let me earnestly thank you (so far as my
+own feelings may be permitted voice in the matter) for the attention
+with which you have examined, and the courage with which you have
+ratified, or at least endured, letters which could not but bear at first
+the aspect of being written in a hostile--sometimes even in a mocking
+spirit. That aspect is untrue, nor am I answerable for it: the things of
+which I had to speak could not be shortly described but in terms which
+might sound satirical; for all error, if frankly shown, is precisely
+most ridiculous when it is most dangerous, and I have written no word
+which is not chosen as the exactest for its occasion, whether it move
+sigh or smile. In my earlier days I wrote much with the desire to
+please, and the hope of influencing the reader. As I grow older and
+older, I recognize the truth of the Preacher's saying, "Desire shall
+fail, and the mourners go about the streets;" and I content myself with
+saying, to whoso it may concern, that the thing is verily thus, whether
+they will hear or whether they will forbear. No man more than I has ever
+loved the places where God's honour dwells, or yielded truer allegiance
+to the teaching of His evident servants. No man at this time grieves
+more for the danger of the Church which supposes him her enemy, while
+she whispers procrastinating _pax vobiscum_ in answer to the spurious
+kiss of those who would fain toll curfew over the last fires of English
+faith, and watch the sparrow find nest where she may lay her young,
+around the altars of the Lord.
+
+ Ever affectionately yours,
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+
+
+
+ APPENDIX
+
+
+Mr. Ruskin having kindly entrusted me with his valuable English
+thirteenth century MS. service book, referred to p. 295, I have thought
+it would be interesting to the readers of this volume to see a little
+more in detail some of the origins of our Litany and Collects. I think
+it will be owned that our Reformers failed to mend some of them in the
+translation. I am quite unversed in the reading of ancient MSS., but I
+hope the following, with the translation, will not be found incorrect. I
+have preserved neither the contractions nor the responses repeated after
+each petition, and have changed the mediaeval "e" into "ae," as "terre"
+into "terrae."--EDITOR.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Ut dompnum apostolicum et omnes gradus ecclesiae in sancta religione
+conservare digneris.
+
+ _Te rogamus, audi nos, Domine._
+
+Ut episcopum nostrum et gregem sibi commissum conservare digneris.
+
+ _Te rogamus...._
+
+Ut regi nostro et principibus nostris pacem et veram concordiam atque
+victoriam, donare digneris.
+
+Ut episcopos et abbates nostros et congregationes illis commissas in
+sancta religione conservare digneris.
+
+Ut congregationes omnium sanctorum in tuo sancto servitio conservare
+digneris.
+
+Ut cunctum populum Christianum precioso sanguine tuo conservare
+digneris.
+
+Ut omnibus benefactoribus nostris sempiterna bona retribuas.
+
+Ut animas nostras et parentum nostrorum ab eterna dampnatione eripias.
+
+Ut mentes nostras ad celestia desideria erigas.
+
+Ut obsequium servitutis nostrae rationabile facias.
+
+Ut locum istum et omnes habitantes in eo visitare et consolari digneris.
+
+Ut fructus terrae dare et conservare digneris.
+
+Ut inimicos sanctae Dei ecclesiae comprimere digneris.
+
+Ut oculos misericordiae tuae super nos reducere digneris.
+
+Ut miserias pauperum et captivorum intueri et relevare digneris.
+
+Ut omnibus fidelibus defunctis requiem eternam dones.
+
+Ut nos exaudire digneris.
+
+Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,
+
+ _Parce nobis Domine._
+
+Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,
+
+ _Exaudi nos._
+
+Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi,
+
+ _Miserere nobis._
+
+Deus cui proprium est misereri semper et parcere suscipe deprecationem
+nostram et quos delictorum cathena constringit misericordia tuae pietatis
+absolvas, per Jesum Christum.
+
+Ecclesiae tuae Domine, preces placatus admitte ut destructis
+adversitatibus universis secura tibi serviat libertate.
+
+Omnipotens sempiterne Deus qui facis mirabilia magna solus pretende
+super famulum tuum episcopum nostrum et super cunctas congregationes
+illi commissas spiritum gratiae tuae salutaris et ut in veritate tibi
+complaceant perpetuum eis rorem tuae benedictionis infunde, per Jesum.
+
+Deus in cujus manu corda sunt regum qui es humilium consolator et
+fidelium fortitudo et protector omnium in te sperantium, da regi nostro
+et reginae populoque Christiano, triumphum virtutis tuae scienter
+excolere, ut per te semper reparentur ad veniam.
+
+Pretende Domine et famulis et famulabus tuis dexteram celestis auxilii
+ut te toto corde propinquant atque digne postulationes assequantur.
+
+Deus a quo sancta desideria recta consilia et justa sunt opera, da
+servis tuis illam quam mundus dare non potest pacem ut et corda nostra
+mandatis tuis et hostium ublata formidine tempora sint tua protectione
+tranquilla.
+
+Ure igne sancti spiritus renes nostros et cor nostrum, Domine, ut tibi
+corde casto serviamus et mundo corpore placeamus.
+
+
+ TRANSLATION
+
+That it may please Thee to keep the apostolic lord (_i.e._ the Pope) and
+all ranks of the Church in Thy holy religion.
+
+ _O Lord, we beseech Thee, hear us._
+
+That it may please Thee to keep our bishop, and the flock committed to
+him.
+
+That it may please Thee to give to our king and our princes (or chief
+lords), peace, and true concord, and victory.
+
+That it may please Thee to keep our bishops and abbots, and the
+congregations committed to them, in holy religion.
+
+That it may please Thee to keep the congregations of all saints in Thy
+holy service.
+
+That it may please Thee to keep the whole Christian people with Thy
+precious blood.
+
+That it may please Thee to requite all our benefactors with everlasting
+blessings.
+
+That it may please Thee to preserve our souls and the souls of our
+kindred from eternal damnation.
+
+That it may please Thee that Thou wouldest lift up our hearts to
+heavenly desires.
+
+That it may please Thee to make the obedience of our service reasonable.
+
+That it may please Thee to visit and to comfort this place, and all who
+dwell in it.
+
+That it may please Thee to give and preserve the fruits of the earth.
+
+That it may please Thee to restrain the enemies of the Holy Church of
+God.
+
+That it may please Thee to look upon us with eyes of mercy.
+
+That it may please Thee to behold and relieve the miseries of the poor
+and the prisoners.
+
+That it may please Thee to give eternal peace to all the faithful
+departed.
+
+That it may please Thee to hear us.
+
+Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world.
+
+ _Spare us, O Lord._
+
+Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world.
+
+ _Hear us, O Lord._
+
+Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world.
+
+ _Have mercy on us, O Lord._
+
+O God, whose property it is always to pity and to spare, receive our
+supplications, and by the mercy of Thy fatherly love, loose those whom
+the chain of their sins keeps bound, through Jesus Christ our Lord.
+
+O Lord, receive with indulgence the prayers of Thy Church, that all
+adversities being overcome, it may serve Thee in freedom without fear.
+
+Almighty, Eternal God, who alone doest great wonders, grant to Thy
+servant our bishop, and to all the congregations committed to him, the
+healthful spirit of Thy grace; and that they may please Thee in truth,
+pour out upon them the perpetual dew of Thy blessing.
+
+O God, in whose hand are the hearts of kings, who art the consoler of
+the meek and the strength of the faithful, and the protector of all that
+trust in Thee, give to our king and queen and to the Christian people
+wisely to manifest the glory of Thy power, that by Thee they may ever be
+restored to forgiveness.
+
+Extend, O Lord, over Thy servants and handmaidens, the right hand of Thy
+heavenly aid, that they may draw near unto Thee with all their heart,
+and worthily obtain their petitions.
+
+Kindle with the fire of Thy Holy Spirit our reins and our hearts, O
+Lord, that we may serve Thee with a clean heart, and please Thee with a
+pure body.
+
+O God, from whom are all holy desires, right counsels, and just works,
+give unto Thy servants that peace which the world cannot give, that both
+our hearts (may obey) Thy commands, and the fear of the enemy being
+taken away, we may have quiet times by Thy protection.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Upon one of the blank leaves of this MS. are some interesting remarks
+upon its probable date, furnished by Mr. Ruskin himself. "The style, and
+pieces of inner evidence in all this book speak it clearly of the first
+half of the thirteenth century. The architecture is all round
+arched--the roofs of Norman simplicity--unpinnacled--the severe and
+simple forms of letter are essentially Norman, and the leaf and ball
+terminations of the spiral of the extremities, exactly intermediate
+between the Norman and Gothic types. The ivy and geranium leaves begin
+to show themselves long before the end of the thirteenth century, and
+there is not a trace of them in this book." This evidence of early date,
+however, is qualified by the further statement, "old styles sometimes
+hold on long in provincial MSS."
+
+ J. RUSKIN.
+
+ BRANTWOOD, _April 14th, 1881_.
+
+
+ THE END
+
+ _Printed by_ BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO.
+ _Edinburgh and London_
+
+
+
+
+ _WORKS BY JOHN RUSKIN_
+
+ MODERN PAINTERS. In 5 vols. with all the Woodcuts, 1 Lithograph,
+ and the 89 Full-Page Steel Engravings. The text is that of the 1873
+ Edition, with Notes, and a New Epilogue. Cloth, L6, 6s. the 5
+ vols., imp. 8vo.
+
+ THE STONES OF VENICE. Complete Edition. (Imperial 8vo.) 3 vols.
+ with the 53 Plates and the Text as originally issued, and Index.
+ Cloth, L4, 4s. the 3 vols.
+
+ EXAMPLES OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF VENICE. With the Text and the 16
+ Plates as originally published. Cloth cover (unbound), atlas folio
+ (about 25 in. by 17 in.), L2, 2s.
+
+ THE POETRY OF ARCHITECTURE; or, The Architecture of the Nations of
+ Europe considered in its Association with Natural Scenery and
+ National Character. With Frontispiece in Colour, 14 Plates in
+ Photogravure, and 9 Full-Page and other Woodcuts. 4to, cloth,
+ 21s.
+
+ VERONA, AND OTHER LECTURES. Delivered principally at the Royal and
+ London Institutions between 1870 and 1883. With Frontispiece in
+ colour and 11 Photogravure Plates. Med. 8vo, cloth, 15s.
+
+ ON THE OLD ROAD: a Collection of Miscellaneous Pamphlets, Articles,
+ and Essays (1834-84). In 3 vols., 8vo, cloth, 30s. (Not sold
+ separately.)
+
+ ARROWS OF THE CHACE: being a Collection of the Scattered Letters of
+ John Ruskin (1840-1880). With Preface. In 2 vols. cloth, 8vo,
+ 20s. (Not sold separately.)
+
+ PRAETERITA. Outlines of Scenes and Thoughts perhaps Worthy of Memory
+ in my Past Life. Vols. I. and II. of this autobiography now ready,
+ in cloth, 13s. each, med. 8vo.
+
+ THE ART OF ENGLAND. Six Lectures delivered at Oxford in 1883. With
+ Appendix and Index. Cloth, 6s., 4to.
+
+ UNTO THIS LAST. Four Essays on the First Principles of Political
+ Economy. Tenth Edition. Cloth, 3s.; roan, gilt edges, 4s.,
+ fcap. 8vo.
+
+ SELECTIONS FROM RUSKIN. 2 vols. crown 8vo, with Index. (Sold
+ separately), cloth, 6s. each; roan, gilt edges, 8s. 6d. each.
+
+ THE FIRST SERIES (from Works written between 1843 and 1860), with
+ engraved Portrait.
+
+ THE SECOND SERIES (from Works written between 1860 and 1888), with
+ Photogravure Portrait.
+
+ FRONDES AGRESTES. Readings in "Modern Painters." Thirteenth Edition.
+ Cloth, 3s.; roan, gilt edges, 4s.
+
+
+ _Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. each; roan, gilt edges, 7s. 6d. each._
+
+ SESAME AND LILIES. A Small Complete Edition, containing the Three
+ Lectures, with long Preface and Index.
+
+ MUNERA PULVERIS. Six Essays on the Elements of Political Economy.
+ Second Edition, with Index.
+
+ The EAGLE'S NEST. Ten Lectures on the Relation of Natural Science
+ to Art. Third Edition, with Index.
+
+ TIME and TIDE, by WEARE and TYNE. Twenty-five Letters to a Working
+ Man of Sunderland on Laws of Work. Fourth Edition, with Index.
+
+ The CROWN of WILD OLIVE. Four Essays on Work, Traffic, War, and the
+ Future of England. With Articles on the Economy of the Kings of
+ Prussia. Ninth Edition, with Index.
+
+ QUEEN of the AIR: a Study of the Greek Myths of Cloud and Storm.
+ Sixth Edition, with Index.
+
+ The TWO PATHS. Lectures on Art and its Application to Decoration
+ and Manufacture. Delivered in 1858-59. With New Preface and Added
+ Notes. Third Edition.
+
+ "A JOY FOR EVER" (and its Price in the Market). The Substance of
+ Two Lectures on the Political Economy of Art. With New Preface and
+ Added Articles. Third Edition, with Index.
+
+ LECTURES on ART, delivered at Oxford in 1870. With Preface. Seventh
+ Edition, with Index.
+
+ The ETHICS of the DUST. Ten Lectures to Little Housewives on the
+ Elements of Crystallisation. Eighth Edition.
+
+ The ELEMENTS of DRAWING. In Three Letters to Beginners, with Index.
+ Illustrated.
+
+ The STONES of VENICE: Selections for the Use of Travellers. 2 vols.
+ cloth, 5s. each. Sixth Edition, with Index.
+
+
+ _Small post 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d. each; roan, gilt edges, 10s. each,
+ complete with all the Plates._
+
+ The SEVEN LAMPS of ARCHITECTURE. The 14 Plates for this Edition
+ have been specially prepared from the larger Work. Sixth Edition.
+
+ ARATRA PENTILICI: Seven Lectures on the Elements of Sculpture. With
+ 1 Engraving on Steel and 20 Autotype Plates.
+
+ VAL D'ARNO. Ten Lectures on Art of the Thirteenth Century in Pisa
+ and Florence. With 1 Steel Engraving and 12 Autotype Plates.
+
+ ARIADNE FLORENTINA: Six Lectures on Wood and Metal Engraving, and
+ Appendix. With 4 Full-Page Facsimiles from Holbein's "Dance of
+ Death," and 12 Autotype Plates.
+
+ LECTURES on ARCHITECTURE and PAINTING. Delivered at Edinburgh in
+ November, 1853. With 15 Full-Page Illustrations drawn by the
+ Author.
+
+ THE HARBOURS OF ENGLAND. With the 12 Illustrations by TURNER,
+ reproduced in Photogravure, and an Introduction by T. J. WISE.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ FORS CLAVIGERA: Letters to the Labourers and Workmen of Great
+ Britain. A New Cheap Edition, with all the Illustrations. In Four
+ Volumes, each with an Index, crown 8vo, cloth, 6s. each; roan,
+ gilt edges, 8s. 6d. each.
+
+ VOL. I. containing Letters I. to XXIV., 530 pages. [_Just out._
+ VOL. II. containing Letters XXV. to XLVIII.,
+ about 500 pages. [ _In May._
+ VOL. III. containing Letters XLIX. to LXXII. } _In the
+ VOL. IV. containing Letters LXXIII. to XCVI. } Autumn._
+
+ LETTERS TO THE CLERGY: On the Lord's Prayer and the Church. Edited
+ by Rev. F. A. MALLESON. Third Edition, with Additional Letters by
+ Mr. RUSKIN, crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. The last Edition, published in
+ 1883, has long been out of print.
+
+ THREE LETTERS and AN ESSAY on LITERATURE, 1836-1841. Found in his
+ Tutor's Desk. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3s.
+
+ LETTERS TO A COLLEGE FRIEND, 1840-1845, including an Essay on
+ "Death before Adam Fell." Crown 8vo, cloth, 4s.
+
+ HORTUS INCLUSUS. Messages from the Wood to the Garden. Being
+ Letters to the Sister Ladies of the Thwaite, Coniston. Second
+ Edition. Cloth, 4s.
+
+ THE OXFORD MUSEUM. By Sir HENRY ACLAND. With Letters from JOHN
+ RUSKIN and New Preface by Sir HENRY ACLAND. With Portrait of Mr.
+ Ruskin, taken in 1893, an Engraving of Capital, and a Plan. Crown
+ 8vo, cloth, 4s.
+
+ RUSKIN ON MUSIC: being Extracts from the Works of JOHN RUSKIN.
+ Intended for the Use of all interested in the Art of Music.
+
+ Edited by Miss A. M. WAKEFIELD. With Frontispiece in Colour.
+ Med. 8vo, cloth, 5s. net; half-parchment, 6s. 6d. net.
+
+ STUDIES IN RUSKIN: Some Aspects of Mr. Ruskin's Work and Teaching.
+ By EDWARD T. COOK. 13 Woodcuts. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s.; roan, gilt
+ edges, 7s. 6d. Second Edition.
+
+ Also a Large-Paper Edition, crown 4to, price 12s. 6d.
+ Containing, in addition to the Woodcuts, 13 Autotypes of
+ Drawings by Mr. RUSKIN. With Descriptive Text.
+
+ THE PRINCIPLES OF ART. As Illustrated by Examples in the Ruskin
+ Museum at Sheffield. Compiled by WILLIAM WHITE from Mr. Ruskin's
+ Works, with some unpublished Matter and 6 Photogravure Plates. Demy
+ 8vo, 10s. 6d. net.
+
+
+ _MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS_
+
+ OLD FRENCH ROMANCES. Done into English by WILLIAM MORRIS. With an
+ Introduction by JOSEPH JACOBS.
+
+ "King Coustans the Emperor. The Friendship of Amis and Amile. King
+ Floras and the Fair Jehane. Story of Over Sea." Crown 8vo, cloth,
+ gilt top, 4s. 6d. net.
+
+ THROUGH THE DOLOMITES, from VENICE to TOBLACH. A Practical,
+ Historical, and Descriptive Guide-Book. By the Rev. ALEXANDER
+ ROBERTSON, D.D. (of Venice).
+
+ With 42 Full-Page Illustrations reproduced from Pictures by W.
+ LOGSDAIL, H. G. KEASBEY, and from Photographs, with a Map of the
+ District. Also an Appendix giving Tables of Railway and Diligence
+ Stations, Times, Fares, &c., Carriage Tariffs, Charges for Guides,
+ Hotels, &c. Small crown 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d.
+
+ This is intended to be a supplementary volume to Mr. HARE'S
+ "Cities of Northern Italy," and is the only guide of the kind
+ dealing with the great highway through that beautiful mountain
+ district, which is becoming more and more the resort of
+ travellers.
+
+ "AS OTHERS SEE US." A Series of Volumes giving Impressions of
+ England and of English Life by various Continental Authors. Edited
+ by JOSEPH JACOBS. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. each.
+
+ I. THE ENGLAND OF TO-DAY. From the Portuguese of OLIVEIRA MARTINS.
+ Translated by C. J. WILLDEY, 340 pages.
+
+ II. ACROSS THE CHANNEL. From the French of GABRIEL MOUREY ("GIL
+ BLAS").
+
+ _OTHER VOLUMES TO FOLLOW._
+
+ BROWNING AND THE CHRISTIAN FAITH. On the Evidences of Christianity
+ from Browning's Point of View. By EDWARD BERDOE. Crown 8vo, cloth,
+ 5s.; 256 pages. [_Just out._
+
+ BROWNING STUDIES. By Bishop WESTCOTT, Professor CORSON, Mrs.
+ IRELAND, and other Members of the Browning Society. With an
+ Introduction by EDWARD BERDOE. Demy 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d.
+
+ SPENSER'S "FAERIE QUEENE." With over 90 Full-page Illustrations,
+ besides 150 Headings and Tailpieces by WALTER CRANE.
+
+ A limited Edition on Arnold's Hand-made Paper, large post 4to, in
+ NINETEEN Monthly Parts, price 10s. 6d. net each Part. No odd
+ Parts supplied separately.
+
+ The Text (which has been collated from Four Editions, including
+ that of 1590) is edited by THOMAS J. WISE.
+
+ BOOKS I. to IV., price L1, 11s. 6d. each; cloth, L1, 14s.
+ each.
+
+ PART XIII., with 4 Full-page Designs, 5 Canto Headings, and 4
+ Tailpieces. [_Just out._
+
+ THE MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR. In Eight Designs. By WALTER CRANE.
+ Printed on Japanese silk paper, and mounted on cardboard. Each copy
+ is signed by Mr. CRANE and numbered. Buckram, gilt top, plates
+ guarded, imperial 4to, 21s. net.
+
+ OLD-WORLD JAPAN: Legends of the Land of the Gods. By FRANK RINDER.
+ With 34 Pictures and Cover designed by T. H. ROBINSON. Cloth, gilt
+ top, 6s.
+
+ JACOB AND THE RAVEN. By FRANCES MARY PEARD. With other Stories for
+ Children, and 39 Illustrations by HEYWOOD SUMNER. Large crown 8vo,
+ cloth, gilt edges, 5s.
+
+ THE HISTORY OF HUON OF BORDEAUX: A Legend of the Time of
+ Charlemagne. By ROBERT STEELE. With 22 Illustrations by FRED.
+ MASON. Antique Paper. Fcap. 4to, cloth, 10s. 6d.
+
+ PRIDE AND PREJUDICE. By JANE AUSTEN. With 100 Illustrations by HUGH
+ THOMSON, and an Introduction by GEORGE SAINTSBURY. Crown 8vo, cloth
+ gilt, 6s.
+
+ MARMONTEL'S MORAL TALES. Selected and Re-translated, with
+ Biographical and Critical Introduction and Notes by GEORGE
+ SAINTSBURY, and 45 Illustrations by CHRIS. HAMMOND. Crown 8vo,
+ cloth, gilt top or edges, 6s.
+
+ SIR CHARLES GRANDISON. By SAMUEL RICHARDSON. The Letters being
+ Selected and Arranged to form a connected Narrative, with
+ Biographical and Critical Introduction and Notes, by GEORGE
+ SAINTSBURY, and 60 Drawings by CHRIS. HAMMOND. In 2 vols., crown
+ 8vo, cloth, gilt tops or edges, 12s.
+
+ HANS ANDERSEN'S STORIES AND FAIRY TALES. Translated by H. OSKAR
+ SOMMER. With over One Hundred Pictures and Initial Letters by
+ ARTHUR J. GASKIN. In 2 vols., large crown 8vo, 6s. each. Sold
+ separately.
+
+ A few of the Special Large-Paper Copies on Arnold's Hand-made Paper
+ still remain. Crown 4to, L2, 2s. net, the 2 vols.
+
+ LEGENDS FROM RIVER AND MOUNTAIN. Translated from the Roumanian and
+ German by CARMEN SYLVA (H.M. the Queen of Roumania) and ALMA
+ STRETTELL. With 40 Illustrations by T. H. ROBINSON. Large crown
+ 8vo, cloth, gilt top, 6s.
+
+ SLAV TALES. Translated from the French of CHODSKO, and Illustrated
+ with 60 Drawings by EMILY J. HARDING. Large crown 8vo, cloth, gilt
+ top, 6s.
+
+ THE MEMORIES AND THOUGHTS OF A LIFE. By Judge O'CONNOR MORRIS. This
+ book is chiefly conversant with Ireland during the last Sixty
+ Years. Demy 8vo, cloth. 12s. 6d., with Portrait.
+
+ LULLABIES OF MANY LANDS. Collected and rendered into English by
+ ALMA STRETTELL. With 77 Illustrations and specially designed Cover
+ by EMILY HARDING. Fcap. 4to, cloth, 7s. 6d.
+
+ THE DISAGREEABLE DUKE. A Christmas Whimsicality for Holiday Girls
+ and Boys. By ELLINOR DAVENPORT ADAMS. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3s. 6d.
+
+ A MODEL WIFE, AND OTHER STORIES. By Mrs. COMYNS CARR. Crown 8vo,
+ cloth, 3s. 6d.
+
+ THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF THOMAS PELHAM DALE. By HELEN PELHAM DALE.
+ With 4 Photogravure Portraits, 6 Plates in Colour, and other
+ Illustrations. In 2 vols., crown 8vo, cloth, 12s. 6d.
+
+ SONGS OF A PARISH PRIEST. By Rev. BASIL EDWARDS. With Woodcut of
+ Churchyard Cross. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, parchment, 2s.;
+ cloth, 2s. 6d.
+
+ REVOLUTION AND REACTION IN MODERN FRANCE. By G. LOWES DICKINSON.
+ The Substance of Lectures dealing with the History of France, from
+ 1789 to 1871. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s.
+
+ A BOOK OF PICTURED CAROLS. With 12 Full-Page Designs by Members of
+ the Birmingham Art School. Hand-printed on Hand-made Paper, 74
+ pages. Fcap. 4to, 5s.
+
+ THE GARDEN OF JAPAN: a Year's Diary of its Flowers. By F. T.
+ PIGGOTT, M.A. With Two Full-Page Plates of Japanese Flowers in
+ Colour, and other Illustrations by the Author, including some
+ Coloured Ornaments on Title-Pages. Also Four Pictures by ALFRED
+ EAST, R.I. Hand-printed, demy 4to, Japanese Vellum, 10s. 6d.
+
+ _WORKS BY AUGUSTUS J. C. HARE_
+
+ LIFE AND LETTERS OF FRANCES, BARONESS BUNSEN. Third Edition. With
+ Portraits. 2 vols., crown 8vo, 21s.
+
+ MEMORIALS OF A QUIET LIFE. 3 vols., crown 8vo. Vols. I. and II.,
+ 21s. (Nineteenth Edition); Vol. III., with numerous Photographs,
+ 10s. 6d.
+
+ DAYS NEAR ROME. With more than 100 Illustrations by the Author.
+ Third Edition. 2 vols., crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+ WALKS IN ROME. Thirteenth Edition, revised. With Map. 2 vols.,
+ fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 10s.
+
+ WALKS IN LONDON. Sixth Edition, revised. With additional
+ Illustrations. 2 vols., fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 12s.
+
+ WESTMINSTER. Reprinted from "Walks in London," as a Handy Guide.
+ 120 pages. Paper covers, 6d. _net_; cloth, 1s.
+
+ WANDERINGS IN SPAIN. With 17 full-page Illustrations. Fifth
+ Edition. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
+
+ CITIES OF SOUTHERN ITALY AND SICILY. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo,
+ 10s. 6d.
+
+ CITIES OF NORTHERN ITALY. Second Edition. With Illustrations. 2
+ vols., crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+ CITIES OF CENTRAL ITALY. Second Edition. With Illustrations. 2
+ vols., crown 8vo, 12s. 6d.
+
+ SKETCHES IN HOLLAND AND SCANDINAVIA. Crown 8vo, with Illustrations,
+ 3s. 6d.
+
+ STUDIES IN RUSSIA. Crown 8vo, with numerous Illustrations, 10s.
+ 6d.
+
+ FLORENCE. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, Illustrated, cloth limp, 3s.
+
+ VENICE. Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo, cloth limp, 3s. With
+ Illustrations.
+
+ PARIS. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s.; or in 2 vols,
+ cloth limp, 10s. 6d.
+
+ DAYS NEAR PARIS. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s.; or
+ in 2 vols., cloth limp, 10s. 6d.
+
+ NORTH-EASTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and
+ 86 Woodcuts. 532 pages.
+
+ Picardy--Abbeville and Amiens--Paris and its Environs--Arras and
+ the Manufacturing Towns of the North--Champagne--Nancy and the
+ Vosges, &c.
+
+
+ SOUTH-EASTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and 176
+ Woodcuts. 600 pages.
+
+ The different lines to the South--Burgundy--Auvergne--The
+ Cantal--Provence--The Alpes Dauphinaises and Alpes Maritimes;
+ &c.
+
+ SOUTH-WESTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and 232
+ Woodcuts. 664 pages.
+
+ The Loire--The Gironde and Landes--Creuse--Correze--The
+ Limousin--Gascony and Languedoc--The Cevennes and the Pyrenees,
+ &c.
+
+ NORTH-WESTERN FRANCE. Crown 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d. With Map and 73
+ Woodcuts. 410 pages.
+
+ Normandy and Brittany--Rouen--Dieppe--Cherbourg--Bayeux--Caen--
+ Coutances--Chartres--Mont S. Michel--Dinan--Brest--Alencon, &c.
+
+ SUSSEX. With Map and 40 Woodcuts. Crown 8vo, cloth, 6s.
+
+ THE STORY OF TWO NOBLE LIVES: CHARLOTTE, COUNTESS CANNING, and
+ LOUISA, MARCHIONESS OF WATERFORD. In 3 vols. of about 450 pages
+ each. Crown 8vo, cloth, L1, 11s. 6d. 32 Plates in Photogravure from
+ Lady Waterford's Drawings, and 32 Woodcuts.
+
+ Also a Special Large-Paper Edition, with India Proofs of the
+ Plates. Crown 4to, L3, 3s. net.
+
+ THE GURNEYS OF EARLHAM: Being Memoirs and Letters of the Eleven
+ Children of JOHN and CATHERINE GURNEY of Earlham, 1775-1875, and
+ the Story of their Religious Life under Many Different Forms.
+ Illustrated with 33 Photogravure Plates and 19 Woodcuts. In 2
+ vols., crown 8vo, cloth, 25s. 712 pages.
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES: Being Memorial Sketches of ARTHUR PENRHYN
+ STANLEY, Dean of Westminster; HENRY ALFORD, Dean of Canterbury;
+ Mrs. DUNCAN STEWART; and PARAY LE MONIAL. Illustrated with 7
+ Portraits and 17 Woodcuts. 1 vol., crown 8vo, cloth, 8s. 6d.
+
+
+ _GEORGE ALLEN, 156, CHARING CROSS ROAD, LONDON_
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber's Notes:
+
+
+1. P. 37: "Mis-understanding" is chosen to be written with a hyphen
+("But, at all events, it is surely the pastor's duty to prevent his
+flock from _mis_-understanding it...")
+
+2. P. 5 of the Appendix: "Miscellaneons" changed to "Miscellaneous" in
+the header of the page.
+
+3. The words that were chosen to be written with a hyphen: mustard-seed
+(p. 23), Janus-faced (p. 31), thorough-going (p. 116), slow-witted (p.
+116), simple-minded (p. 126), so-called (p. 126), animad-versions (p.
+245), Hand-made (p. 6, Appendix), Hand-printed (p. 7, Appendix)
+
+4. The words that were chosen to be written without a hyphen:
+overcrowding (p. 91), shortcomings (p. 172), overthrow (p. 178),
+widespread (p. 180).
+
+5. Added quotes (p. 153, '... for clerky people."')
+
+6. Added period after the Greek epigraph to letters VII (p. 19) and X
+(p. 36).
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Letters to the Clergy, by John Ruskin
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS TO THE CLERGY ***
+
+***** This file should be named 39283.txt or 39283.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/9/2/8/39283/
+
+Produced by Paul Murray, Elizaveta Shevyakhova and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/39283.zip b/39283.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2b679c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39283.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..65415c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #39283 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/39283)