diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:09:36 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:09:36 -0700 |
| commit | 976d288c597d233e7582683df0204b568b3eabf9 (patch) | |
| tree | 2513cbf08a757652ffd2b3f4742752ba5d4f3954 | |
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117-8.txt | 17310 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117-8.zip | bin | 0 -> 360492 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 575991 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117-h/38117-h.htm | 16506 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 0 -> 50130 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117-h/images/cover_lg.jpg | bin | 0 -> 150882 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117.txt | 17311 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38117.zip | bin | 0 -> 360410 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 |
11 files changed, 51143 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/38117-8.txt b/38117-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e65504d --- /dev/null +++ b/38117-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,17310 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and Body; +Vol. II Love and Society, by Upton Sinclair + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and Body; Vol. II Love and Society + +Author: Upton Sinclair + +Release Date: November 23, 2011 [EBook #38117] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BOOK OF LIFE *** + + + + +Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images available at The Internet Archive) + + + + + + + + + +The +Book _of_ Life + +UPTON SINCLAIR + + + + +THE BOOK OF LIFE + + + + +_The_ +Book of Life + +_By_ UPTON SINCLAIR + +VOLUME ONE: +MIND AND BODY + +VOLUME TWO: +LOVE AND SOCIETY + +UPTON SINCLAIR +PASADENA, CALIFORNIA + +WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS +_THE PAINE BOOK COMPANY_ +CHICAGO + +COPYRIGHT, 1921, 1922 +BY +UPTON SINCLAIR +_All Rights Reserved._ + + + _To_ + Kate Crane Gartz +in acknowledgment of her unceasing efforts for a +better world, and her fidelity to those + who struggle to achieve it. + + + + +INTRODUCTORY + + +The writer of this book has been in this world some forty-two years. +That may not seem long to some, but it is long enough to have made many +painful mistakes, and to have learned much from them. Looking about him, +he sees others making these same mistakes, suffering for lack of that +same knowledge which he has so painfully acquired. This being the case, +it seems a friendly act to offer his knowledge, minus the blunders and +the pain. + +There come to the writer literally thousands of letters every year, +asking him questions, some of them of the strangest. A man is dying of +cancer, and do I think it can be cured by a fast? A man is unable to +make his wife happy, and can I tell him what is the matter with women? A +man has invested his savings in mining stock, and can I tell him what to +do about it? A man works in a sweatshop, and has only a little time for +self-improvement, and will I tell him what books he ought to read? Many +such questions every day make one aware of a vast mass of people, +earnest, hungry for happiness, and groping as if in a fog. The things +they most need to know they are not taught in the schools, nor in the +newspapers they read, nor in the church they attend. Of these agencies, +the first is not entirely competent, the second is not entirely honest, +and the third is not entirely up to date. Nor is there anywhere a book +in which the effort has been made to give to everyday human beings the +everyday information they need for the successful living of their lives. + +For the present book the following claims may be made. First, it is a +modern book; its writer watches hour by hour the new achievements of the +human mind, he reaches out for information about them, he seeks to +adjust his own thoughts to them and to test them in his own living. +Second, it is, or tries hard to be, a wise book; its writer is not among +those too-ardent young radicals who leap to the conclusion that because +many old things are stupid and tiresome, therefore everything that is +old is to be spurned with contempt, and everything that proclaims itself +new is to be taken at its own valuation. Third, it is an honest book; +its writer will not pretend to know what he only guesses, and where it +is necessary to guess, he will say so frankly. Finally, it is a kind +book; it is not written for its author's glory, nor for his enrichment, +but to tell you things that may be useful to you in the brief span of +your life. It will attempt to tell you how to live, how to find health +and happiness and success, how to work and how to play, how to eat and +how to sleep, how to love and to marry and to care for your children, +how to deal with your fellow men in business and politics and social +life, how to act and how to think, what religion to believe, what art to +enjoy, what books to read. A large order, as the boys phrase it! + +There are several ways for such a book to begin. It might begin with the +child, because we all begin that way; it might begin with love, because +that precedes the child; it might begin with the care of the body, +explaining that sound physical health is the basis of all right living, +and even of right thinking; it might begin as most philosophies do, by +defining life, discussing its origin and fundamental nature. + +The trouble with this last plan is that there are a lot of people who +have their ideas on life made up in tabloid form; they have creeds and +catechisms which they know by heart, and if you suggest to them anything +different, they give you a startled look and get out of your way. And +then there is another, and in our modern world a still larger class, who +say, "Oh, shucks! I don't go in for religion and that kind of thing." +You offer them something that looks like a sermon, and they turn to the +baseball page. + +Who will read this Book of Life? There will be, among others, the great +American tired business man. He wrestles with problems and cares all +day, and when he sits down to read in the evening, he says: "Make it +short and snappy." There is the wife of the tired business man, the +American perfect lady. She does most of the reading for the family; but +she has never got down to anything fundamental in her life, and mostly +she likes to read about exciting love affairs, which she distinguishes +from the unexciting kind she knows by the word "romance." Then there is +the still more tired American workingman, who has been "speeded up" all +day under the bonus system or the piece-work system, and is apt to fall +asleep in his chair before he finishes supper. Then there is the +workingman's wife, who has slaved all day in the kitchen, and has a +chance for a few minutes' intimacy with her husband before he falls +asleep. She would like to have somebody tell her what to do for croup, +but she is not sure that she has time to discuss the question whether +life is worth living. + +Yet, I wonder; is there a single one among all these tired people, or +even among the cynical people, who has not had some moment of awe when +the thought came stabbing into his mind like a knife: "What a strange +thing this life is! What am I anyhow? Where do I come from, and what is +going to become of me? What do I mean, what am I here for?" I have sat +chatting with three hoboes by a railroad track, cooking themselves a +mulligan in an old can, and heard one of them say: "By God, it's a queer +thing, ain't it, mate?" I have sat on the deck of a ship, looking out +over the midnight ocean and talking with a sailor, and heard him use +almost the identical words. It is not only in the class-room and the +schools that the minds of men are grappling with the fundamental +problems; in fact, it was not from the schools that the new religions +and the great moral impulses of humanity took their origin. It was from +lonely shepherds sitting on the hillsides, and from fishermen casting +their nets, and from carpenters and tailors and shoemakers at their +benches. + +Stop and think a bit, and you will realize it does make a difference +what you believe about life, how it comes to be, where it is going, and +what is your place in it. Is there a heaven with a God, who watches you +day and night, and knows every thought you think, and will some day take +you to eternal bliss if you obey his laws? If you really believe that, +you will try to find out about his laws, and you will be comparatively +little concerned about the success or failure of your business. Perhaps, +on the other hand, you have knocked about in the world and lost your +"faith"; you have been cheated and exploited, and have set out to "get +yours," as the phrase is; to "feather your own nest." But some gust of +passion seizes you, and you waste your substance, you wreck your life; +then you wonder, "Who set that trap and baited it? Am I a creature of +blind instincts, jealousies and greeds and hates beyond my own control +entirely? Am I a poor, feeble insect, blown about in a storm and +smashed? Or do I make the storm, and can I in any part control it?" + +No matter how busy you may be, no matter how tired you may be, it will +pay you to get such things straight: to know a little of what the wise +men of the past have thought about them, and more especially what +science with its new tools of knowledge may have discovered. + +The writer of this book spent nine years of his life in colleges and +universities; also he was brought up in a church. So he knows the +orthodox teachings, he can say that he has given to the recognized wise +men of the world every opportunity to tell him what they know. Then, +being dissatisfied, he went to the unrecognized teachers, the +enthusiasts and the "cranks" of a hundred schools. Finally, he thought +for himself; he was even willing to try experiments upon himself. As a +result, he has not found what he claims is ultimate or final truth; but +he has what he might describe as a rough working draft, a practical +outline, good for everyday purposes. He is going to have confidence +enough in you, the reader, to give you the hardest part first; that is, +to begin with the great fundamental questions. What is life, and how +does it come to be? What does it mean, and what have we to do with it? +Are we its masters or its slaves? What does it owe us, and what do we +owe to it? Why is it so hard, and do we have to stand its hardness? And +can we really know about all these matters, or will we be only guessing? +Can we trust ourselves to think about them, or shall we be safer if we +believe what we are told? Shall we be punished if we think wrong, and +how shall we be punished? Shall we be rewarded if we think right, and +will the pay be worth the trouble? + +Such questions as these I am going to try to answer in the simplest +language possible. I would avoid long words altogether, if I could; but +some of these long words mean certain definite things, and there are no +other words to serve the purpose. You do not refuse to engage in the +automobile business because the carburetor and the differential are +words of four syllables. Neither should you refuse to get yourself +straight with the universe because it is too much trouble to go to the +dictionary and learn that the word "phenomenon" means something else +than a little boy who can play the piano or do long division in his +head. + + + + +CONTENTS + + +PART ONE: THE BOOK OF THE MIND + + PAGE + +CHAPTER I. THE NATURE OF LIFE 3 + +Attempts to show what we know about life; to set the +bounds of real truth as distinguished from phrases and +self-deception. + +CHAPTER II. THE NATURE OF FAITH 8 + +Attempts to show what we can prove by our reason, and +what we know intuitively; what is implied in the process +of thinking, and without which no thought could be. + +CHAPTER III. THE USE OF REASON 12 + +Attempts to show that in the field to which reason applies +we are compelled to use it, and are justified in trusting it. + +CHAPTER IV. THE ORIGIN OF MORALITY 17 + +Compares the ways of Nature with human morality, and +tries to show how the latter came to be. + +CHAPTER V. NATURE AND MAN 21 + +Attempts to show how man has taken control of Nature, +and is carrying on her processes and improving upon them. + +CHAPTER VI. MAN THE REBEL 27 + +Shows the transition stage between instinct and reason, +in which man finds himself, and how he can advance to +a securer condition. + +CHAPTER VII. MAKING OUR MORALS 31 + +Attempts to show that human morality must change to fit +human facts, and there can be no judge of it save human +reason. + +CHAPTER VIII. THE VIRTUE OF MODERATION 37 + +Attempts to show that wise conduct is an adjustment of +means to ends, and depends upon the understanding of a +particular set of circumstances. + +CHAPTER IX. THE CHOOSING OF LIFE 42 + +Discusses the standards by which we may judge what is +best in life, and decide what we wish to make of it. + +CHAPTER X. MYSELF AND MY NEIGHBOR 50 + +Compares the new morality with the old, and discusses the +relative importance of our various duties. + +CHAPTER XI. THE MIND AND THE BODY 53 + +Discusses the interaction between physical and mental +things, and the possibility of freedom in a world of fixed +causes. + +CHAPTER XII. THE MIND OF THE BODY 61 + +Discusses the subconscious mind, what it is, what it does +to the body, and how it can be controlled and made use +of by the intelligence. + +CHAPTER XIII. EXPLORING THE SUBCONSCIOUS 67 + +Discusses automatic writing, the analysis of dreams, and +other methods by which a new universe of life has been +brought to human knowledge. + +CHAPTER XIV. THE PROBLEM OF IMMORTALITY 74 + +Discusses the survival of personality from the moral point +of view: that is, have we any claim upon life, entitling +us to live forever? + +CHAPTER XV. THE EVIDENCE FOR SURVIVAL 81 + +Discusses the data of psychic research, and the proofs of +spiritism thus put before us. + +CHAPTER XVI. THE POWERS OF THE MIND 91 + +Sets forth the fact that knowledge is freedom and ignorance +is slavery, and what science means to the people. + +CHAPTER XVII. THE CONDUCT OF THE MIND 98 + +Concludes the Book of the Mind with a study of how to +preserve and develop its powers for the protection of our +lives and the lives of all men. + + +PART TWO: THE BOOK OF THE BODY + +CHAPTER XVIII. THE UNITY OF THE BODY 105 + +Discusses the body as a whole, and shows that health is +not a matter of many different organs and functions, but +is one problem of one organism. + +CHAPTER XIX. EXPERIMENTS IN DIET 115 + +Narrates the author's adventures in search of health, and +his conclusions as to what to eat. + +CHAPTER XX. ERRORS IN DIET 123 + +Discusses the different kinds of foods, and the part they +play in the making of health and disease. + +CHAPTER XXI. DIET STANDARDS 134 + +Discusses various foods and their food values, the quantities +we need, and their money cost. + +CHAPTER XXII. FOODS AND POISONS 145 + +Concludes the subject of diet, and discusses the effect upon +the system of stimulants and narcotics. + +CHAPTER XXIII. MORE ABOUT HEALTH 156 + +Discusses the subjects of breathing and ventilation, clothing, +bathing and sleep. + +CHAPTER XXIV. WORK AND PLAY 163 + +Deals with the question of exercise, both for the idle and +the overworked. + +CHAPTER XXV. THE FASTING CURE 169 + +Deals with Nature's own remedy for disease, and how to +make use of it. + +CHAPTER XXVI. BREAKING THE FAST 177 + +Discusses various methods of building up the body after +a fast, especially the milk diet. + +CHAPTER XXVII. DISEASES AND CURES 182 + +Discusses some of the commoner human ailments, and +what is known about their cause and cure. + + + + +PART ONE + +THE BOOK OF THE MIND + + + + +CHAPTER I + +THE NATURE OF LIFE + + (Attempts to show what we know about life; to set the bounds of + real truth as distinguished from phrases and self-deception.) + + +If I could, I would begin this book by telling you what Life is. But +unfortunately I do not know what Life is. The only consolation I can +find is in the fact that nobody else knows either. + +We ask the churches, and they tell us that male and female created He +them, and put them in the Garden of Eden, and they would have been happy +had not Satan tempted them. But then you ask, who made Satan, and the +explanation grows vague. You ask, if God made Satan, and knew what Satan +was going to do, is it not the same as if God did it himself? So this +explanation of the origin of evil gets you no further than the Hindoo +picture of the world resting on the back of a tortoise, and the tortoise +on the head of a snake--and nothing said as to what the snake rests on. + +Let us go to the scientist. I know a certain physiologist, perhaps the +greatest in the world, and his eager face rises before me, and I hear +his quick, impetuous voice declaring that he knows what Life is; he has +told it in several big volumes, and all I have to do is to read them. +Life is a tropism, caused by the presence of certain combinations of +chemicals; my friend knows this, because he has produced the thing in +his test-tubes. He is an exponent of a way of thought called Monism, +which finds the ultimate source of being in forms of energy manifesting +themselves as matter; he shows how all living things arise from that and +sink back into it. + +But question this scientist more closely. What is this "matter" that you +are so sure of? How do you know it? Obviously, through sensations. You +never know matter itself, you only know its effects upon you, and you +assume that the matter must be there to cause the sensation. In other +words, "matter," which seems so real, turns out to be merely "a +permanent possibility of sensation." And suppose there were to be +sensations, caused, for example, by a sportive demon who liked to make +fun of eminent physiologists--then there might be the appearance of +matter and nothing else; in other words, there might be mind, and +various states of mind. So we discover that the materialist, in the +philosophic sense, is making just as large an act of faith, is +pronouncing just as bold a dogma as any priest of any religion. + +This is an old-time topic of disputation. Before Mother Eddy there was +Bishop Berkeley, and before Berkeley, there was Plato, and they and the +materialists disputed until their hearers cried in despair, "What is +Mind? No matter! What is Matter? Never mind!" But a century or two ago +in a town of Prussia there lived a little, dried-up professor of +philosophy, who sat himself down in his room and fixed his eyes on a +church steeple outside the window, and for years on end devoted himself +to examining the tools of thought with which the human mind is provided, +and deciding just what work and how much of it they are fitted to do. So +came the proof that our minds are incapable of reaching to or dealing +with any ultimate reality whatever, but can comprehend only +phenomena--that is to say, appearances--and their relations one with +another. The Koenigsberg professor proved this once for all time, +setting forth four propositions about ultimate reality, and proving them +by exact and irrefutable logic, and then proving by equally exact and +irrefutable logic their precise opposites and contraries. Anybody who +has read and comprehended the four "antinomies" of Immanuel Kant[A] +knows that metaphysics is as dead a subject as astrology, and that all +the complicated theories which the philosophers from Heraclitus to +Arthur Balfour have spun like spiders out of their inner consciousness, +have no more relation to reality than the intricacies of the game of +chess. + + [A] See Paulsen: "Life of Kant." + +The writer is sorry to make this statement, because he spent a lot of +time reading these philosophers and acquainting himself with their +subtle theories. He learned a whole language of long words, and even the +special meanings which each philosopher or school of philosophers give +to them. When he had got through, he had learned, so far as metaphysics +is concerned, absolutely nothing, and had merely the job of clearing out +of his mind great masses of verbal cobwebs. It was not even good +intellectual training; the metaphysical method of thought is a _trap_. +The person who thinks in absolutes and ultimates is led to believe that +he has come to conclusions about reality, when as a matter of fact he +has merely proved what he wants to believe; if he had wanted to believe +the opposite, he could have proven that exactly as well--as his +opponents will at once demonstrate. + +If you multiply two feet by two feet, the result represents a plain +surface, or figure of two dimensions. If you multiply two feet by two +feet by two feet, you have a solid, or figure of three dimensions--such +as the world in which we live and move. But now, suppose you multiply +two feet by two feet by two feet by two feet, what does that represent? +For ages the minds of mathematicians and philosophers have been tempted +by this fascinating problem of the "fourth dimension." They have worked +out by analogy what such a world would be like. If you went into this +"fourth dimension," you could turn yourself inside out, and come back to +our present world in that condition, and no one of your three-dimension +friends would be able to imagine how you had managed it, or to put you +back again the way you belonged. And in this, it seems to me, we have +the perfect analogy of metaphysical thinking. It is the "fourth +dimension" of the mind, and plays as much havoc with sound thinking as a +physical "fourth dimension" would play with--say, the prison system. A +man who takes up an absolute--God, immortality, the origin of being, a +first cause, free will, absolute right or wrong, infinite time or space, +final truth, original substance, the "thing in itself"--that man +disappears into a fourth dimension, and turns himself inside out or +upside down or hindside foremost, and comes back and exhibits himself in +triumph; then, when he is ready, he effects another disappearance, and +another change, and is back on earth an ordinary human being. + +The world is full of schools of thought, theologians and metaphysicians +and professors of academic philosophy, transcendentalists and +theosophists and Christian Scientists, who perform such mental +monkey-shines continuously before our eyes. They prove what they please, +and the fact that no two of them prove the same thing makes clear to us +in the end that none of them has proved anything. The Christian +Scientist asserts that there is no such thing as matter, but that pain +is merely a delusion of mortal mind; he continues serene in this faith +until he runs into an automobile and sustains a compound fracture of +the femur--whereupon he does exactly what any of the rest of us do, goes +to a competent surgeon and has the bone set. On the other hand, some +devoted young Socialists of my acquaintance have read Haeckel and +Dietzgen, and adopted the dogma that matter is the first cause, and that +all things have grown out of it and return to it; they have seen that +the brain decays after death, they declare that the soul is a function +of the brain--and because of such theories they deliberately reject the +most powerful modes of appeal whereby men can be swayed to faith in +human solidarity. + +The best books I know for the sweeping out of metaphysical cobwebs are +"The Philosophy of Common Sense" and "The Creed of a Layman," by +Frederic Harrison, leader of the English Positivists, a school of +thought established by Auguste Comte. But even as I recommend these +books, I recall the dissatisfaction with which I left them; for it +appears that the Positivists have their dogmas like all the rest. Mr. +Harrison is not content to say that mankind has not the mental tools for +dealing with ultimate realities; he must needs prove that mankind never +will and never can have these tools, I look back upon the long process +of evolution and ask myself, What would an oyster think about +Positivism? What would be the opinion of, let us say, a young turnip on +the subject of Mr. Frederic Harrison's thesis? It may well be that the +difference between a turnip and Mr. Harrison is not so great as will be +the difference between Mr. Harrison and that super-race which some day +takes possession of the earth and of all the universe. It does not seem +to me good science or good sense to dogmatize about what this race will +know, or what will be its tools of thought. What does seem to me good +science and good sense is to take the tools which we now possess and use +them to their utmost capacity. + +What is it that we know about life? We know a seemingly endless stream +of sensations which manifest themselves in certain ways, and seem to +inhere in what we call things and beings. We observe incessant change in +all these phenomena, and we examine these changes and discover their +ways. The ways seem to be invariable; so completely so that for +practical purposes we assume them to be invariable, and base all our +calculations and actions upon this assumption. Manifestly, we could not +live otherwise, and the spread of scientific knowledge is the further +tracing out of such "laws"--that is to say, the ways of behaving of +existence--and the extending of our belief in their invariability to +wider and wider fields. + +Once upon a time we were told that "the wind bloweth where it listeth." +But now we are quite certain that there are causes for the blowing of +the wind, and when our researches have been carried far enough, we shall +be able to account for and to predict every smallest breath of air. Once +we were told that dreams came from a supernatural world; but now we are +beginning to analyze dreams, and to explain what they come from and what +they mean. Perhaps we still find human nature a bewildering and +unaccountable thing; but some day we shall know enough of man's body and +his mind, his past and his present, to be able to explain human nature +and to produce it at will, precisely as today we produce certain +reactions in our test-tubes, and do it so invariably that the most +cautious financier will invest tens of millions of dollars in a process, +and never once reflect that he is putting too much trust in the +permanence of nature. + +In many departments of thought great specialists are now working, +experimenting and observing by the methods of science. If in the course +of this book we speak of "certainty," we mean, of course, not the +"absolute" certainty of any metaphysical dogma, but the practical +certainty of everyday common sense; the certainty we feel that eating +food will satisfy our hunger, and that tomorrow, as today, two and two +will continue to make four. + + + + +CHAPTER II + +THE NATURE OF FAITH + + (Attempts to show what we can prove by our reason, and what we know + intuitively; what is implied in the process of thinking, and + without which no thought could be.) + + +The primary fact that we know about life is growth. Herbert Spencer has +defined this growth, or evolution, in a string of long words which may +be summed up to mean: the process whereby a number of things which are +simple and like one another become different parts of one thing which is +complex. If we observe this process in ourselves, and the symptoms of it +in others, we discover that when it is proceeding successfully, it is +accompanied by a sensation of satisfaction which we call happiness or +pleasure; also that when it is thwarted or repressed, it is accompanied +by a different sensation which we call pain. Subtle metaphysicians, both +inside the churches and out, have set themselves to the task of proving +that there must be some other object of life than the continuance of +these sensations of pleasure which accompany successful growth. They +have proven to their own satisfaction that morality will collapse and +human progress come to an end unless we can find some other motive, +something more permanent and more stimulating, something "higher," as +they phrase it. All I can say is that I gave reverent attention to the +arguments of these moralists and theologians, and that for many years I +believed their doctrines; but I believe them no longer. + +I interpret the purpose of life to be the continuous unfoldment of its +powers, its growth into higher forms--that is to say, forms more complex +and subtly contrived, capable of more intense and enduring kinds of that +satisfaction which is nature's warrant of life. If you wish to take up +this statement and argue about it, please wait until you have read the +chapter "Nature and Man," and noted my distinction between instinctive +life and rational life. For men, the word "growth" does not mean _any_ +growth, _all_ growth, blind and indiscriminate growth. It does not mean +growth for the tubercle bacillus, nor growth for the anopheles mosquito, +nor growth for the house-fly, the spider and the louse. Neither do we +mean that the purpose of man's own life is _any_ pleasure, _all_ +pleasure, blind and indiscriminate pleasure; the pleasure of alcohol, +the pleasure of cannibalism, the pleasure of the modern form of +cannibalism which we call "making money." We have survived in the +struggle for existence by the cooperative and social use of our powers +of judgment; and our judgment is that which selects among forms of +growth, which gives preference to wheat and corn over weeds, and to +self-control and honesty over treachery and greed. + +So when we say that the purpose of life is happiness, we do not mean to +turn mankind loose at a hog-trough; we mean that our duty as thinkers is +to watch life, to test it, to pick and choose among the many forms it +offers, and to say: This kind of growth is more permanent and full of +promise, it is more fertile, more deeply satisfactory; therefore, we +choose this, and sanction the kind of pleasure which it brings. Other +kinds we decide are temporary and delusive; therefore we put in jail +anyone who sells alcoholic drink, and we refuse to invite to our home +people who are lewd, and some day we shall not permit our children to +attend moving picture shows in which the modern form of cannibalism is +glorified. + +The reader, no doubt, has been taught a distinction between "science" +and "faith." He is saying now, "You believe that everything is to be +determined by human reason? You reject all faith?" I answer, No; I am +not rejecting faith; I am merely refusing to apply it to objects with +which it has nothing to do. You do not take it as a matter of faith that +a package of sugar weighs a pound; you put it on the scales and find +out--in other words, you make it a matter of experiment. But all the +creeds of all the religious sects are full of pronouncements which are +no more matters of faith than the question of the weighing of sugar. Is +pork a wholesome article of food or is it not? All Christians will +readily acknowledge that this is a matter to be determined by the +microscope and other devices of experimental science; but then some Jew +rises in the meeting and puts the question: Is dancing injurious to the +character? And immediately all members of the Methodist Episcopal Church +vote to close the discussion. + +What is faith? Faith is the instinct which underlies all being, assuring +us that life is worth while and honest, a thing to be trusted; in other +words, it is the certainty that successful growth always is and always +will be accompanied by pleasure. The most skeptical scientist in the +world, even my friend the physiologist who proves that life is nothing +but a tropism, and can be produced by mixing chemicals in +test-tubes--this eager friend is one of the most faithful men I know. He +is burning up with the faith that knowledge is worth possessing, and +also that it is possible of attainment. With what boundless scorn would +he receive any suggestion to the contrary--for example, the idea that +life might be a series of sensations which some sportive demon is +producing for the torment of man! More than that, this friend is burning +up with the certainty that knowledge can be spread, that his fellow men +will receive it and apply it, and that it will make them happy when they +do. Why else does he write his learned books in defense of the +materialist philosophy? + +And that same faith which animates the great monist animates likewise +every child who toddles off to school, and every chicken which emerges +from an egg, and every blade of grass which thrusts its head above the +ground. Not every chicken survives, of course, and all the blades of +grass wither in the fall; nevertheless, the seeds of grass are spread, +and chickens make food for philosophers, and the great process of life +continues to manifest its faith. In the end the life process produces +man, who, as we shall presently see, takes it up, and judges it, and +makes it over to suit himself. + +You will note from this that I am what is called an optimist; whereas +some of the great philosophers of the world have called themselves +pessimists. But I notice with a smile that these are often the men who +work hardest of all to spread their ideas, and thus testify to the +worthwhileness of truth and the perfectibility of mankind. There has +come to be a saying among settlement workers and physicians, who are +familiar with poverty and its effects upon life, that there are no bad +babies and good babies, there are only sick babies and well babies. In +the same way, I would say there are no pessimists and optimists, there +are only mentally sick people and mentally well people. Everywhere +throughout life, both animal and vegetable, health means happiness, and +gives abundant evidence of that fact. All healthy life is satisfactory +to itself; when it develops reason, it tries to find out why, and this +is yet another testimony to the fact that having power and using it is +pleasant. When I was in college the professor would propound the old +question: "Would you rather be a happy pig or an unhappy philosopher?" +My answer always was: "I would rather be a happy philosopher." The +professor replied: "Perhaps that is not possible." But I said: "I will +prove that it is!" + + + + +CHAPTER III + +THE USE OF REASON + + (Attempts to show that in the field to which reason applies we are + compelled to use it, and are justified in trusting it.) + + +The great majority of people are brought up to believe that some +particular set of dogmas are objects of faith, and that there are +penalties more or less severe for the application of reason to these +dogmas. What particular set it happens to be is a matter of geography; +in a crowded modern city like New York, it is a matter of the particular +block on which the child is born. A child born on Hester Street will be +taught that his welfare depends upon his never eating meat and butter +from the same dish. A child born on Tenth Avenue will be taught that it +is a matter of his not eating meat on Fridays. A child born on Madison +Avenue will be taught that it is a question of the precise metaphysical +process by which bread is changed into human body and wine into human +blood. Each of these children will be assured that his human reason is +fallible, that it is extremely dangerous to apply it to this "sacred" +subject, and that the proper thing to do is to accept the authority of +some ancient tradition, or some institution, or some official, or some +book for which a special sanction is claimed. + +Has there ever been in the world any revelation, outside of or above +human reason? Could there ever be such a thing? In order to test this +possibility, select for yourself the most convincing way by which a +special revelation could be handed down to mankind. Take any of the +ancient orthodox ways, the finding of graven tablets on a mountain-top, +or a voice speaking from a burning bush, or an angel appearing before a +great concourse of people and handing out a written scroll. Suppose that +were to happen, let us say, at the next Yale-Harvard football game; +suppose the news were to be flashed to the ends of the earth that God +had thus presented to mankind an entirely new religion. What would be +the process by which the people of London or Calcutta would decide upon +that revelation? First, they would have to consider the question +whether it was an American newspaper fake--by no means an easy question. +Second, they would have to consider the chances of its being an optical +delusion. Then, assuming they accepted the sworn testimony of ten +thousand mature and competent witnesses, they would have to consider the +possibility of someone having invented a new kind of invisible +aeroplane. Assuming they were convinced that it was really a +supernatural being, they would next have to decide the chances of its +being a visitor from Mars, or from the fourth dimension of space, or +from the devil. In considering all this, they would necessarily have to +examine the alleged revelation. What was the literary quality of it? +What was the moral quality of it? What would be the effect upon mankind +if the alleged revelation were to be universally adopted and applied? + +Manifestly, all these are questions for the human reason, the human +judgment; there is no other method of determining them, there would be +nothing for any individual person, or for men as a whole to do, except +to apply their best powers, and, as the phrase is, "make up their minds" +about the matter. Reason would be the judge, and the new revelation +would be the prisoner at the bar. Humanity might say, this is a real +inspiration, we will submit ourselves to it and follow it, and allow no +one from now on to question it. But inevitably there would be some who +would say, "Tommyrot!" There would be others who would say, "This new +revelation isn't working, it is repressing progress, it is stifling the +mind." These people would stand up for their conviction, they would +become martyrs, and all the world would have to discuss them. And who +would decide between them and the great mass of men? Reason, the judge, +would decide. + +It is perfectly true that human reason is fallible. Infallibility is an +absolute, a concept of the mind, and not a reality. Life has not given +us infallibility, any more than it has given us omniscience, or +omnipotence, or any other of those attributes which we call divine. Life +has given us powers, more or less weak, more or less strong, but all +capable of improvement and development. Reason is the tool whereby +mankind has won supremacy over the rest of the animal kingdom, and is +gradually taking control of the forces of nature. It is the best tool we +have, and because it is the best, we are driven irresistibly to use it. +And how strange that some of us can find no better use for it than to +destroy its own self! Visit one of the Jesuit fathers and hear him seek +to persuade you that reason is powerless against faith and must abdicate +to faith. You answer, "Yes, father, you have persuaded me. I admit the +fallibility of my mortal powers; and I begin by applying my doubts of +them to the arguments by which you have just convinced me. I was +convinced, but of course I cannot be sure of a conviction, attained by +fallible reason. Therefore I am just where I was before--except that I +am no longer in position to be certain of anything." + +You answer in good faith, and take up your hat and depart, closing the +door of the good father's study behind you. But stop a moment, why do +you close the door? You close the door because your reason tells you +that otherwise the cold air outside will blow in and make the good +father uncomfortable. You put your hat on, because your reason has not +yet been applied to the problem of the cause of baldness. You step out +onto the street, and when you hear a sudden noise, you step back onto +the curbstone, because your reason tells you that an automobile is +coming, and that on the sidewalk you are safe from it. So you go on, +using your reason in a million acts of your life whereby your life is +preserved and developed. And if anybody suggested that the fallibility +of your reason should cause you to delay in front of an automobile, you +would apply your reason to the problem of that person and decide that he +was insane. And I say that just as there is insanity in everyday +judgments and relationships, so there is insanity in philosophy, +metaphysics and religion; the seed and source of all this kind of +insanity being the notion that it is the duty of anybody to believe +anything which cannot completely justify itself as reasonable. + +Nowadays, as ideas are spreading, the champions of dogma are hard put to +it, and you will find their minds a muddle of two points of view. The +Jewish rabbi will strive desperately to think of some hygienic objection +to the presence of meat and butter on the same plate; the Catholic +priest will tell you that fish is a very wholesome article of food, and +that anyhow we all eat too much; the Methodist and the Baptist and the +Presbyterian will tell you that if men did not rest one day in seven +their health would break down. Thus they justify faith by reason, and +reconcile the conflict between science and theology. Accepting this +method, I experiment and learn that it improves my digestion and adds to +my working power if I play tennis on Sunday. I follow this indisputably +rational form of conduct--and find myself in conflict with the "faith" +of the ancient State of Delaware, which obliges me to serve a term in +its state's prison for having innocently and unwittingly desecrated its +day of holiness! + +If you read Professor Bury's little book, "A History of Freedom of +Thought," you will discover that there has been a long conflict over the +right of men to use their minds--and the victory is not yet. The term +"free thinker," which ought to be the highest badge a man could wear, is +still almost everywhere throughout America a term of vague terror. In +the State of California today there is a Criminal Syndicalism Act, which +provides a maximum of fourteen years in jail for any person who shall +write or publish or speak any words expressive of the idea that the +United States government should be overthrown in the same way that it +was established--that is, by force; only a few months ago the writer of +this book was on the witness stand for two days, and had the painful, +almost incredible experience of being battered and knocked about by an +inquisitive district attorney, who cross-examined him as to every detail +of his beliefs, and read garbled extracts from his published writings, +in the effort to make it appear that he held some belief which might +possibly prejudice the jury against him. The defendant in this case, a +returned soldier who had spent three years as a volunteer in the +trenches, and had been twice wounded and once gassed, was accused, not +merely of approving the Soviet form of government, but also of having +printed uncomplimentary references to priests and religious +institutions. + +Nowadays it is the propertied class which has taken possession of the +powers of government, and which presumes to censor the thinking of +mankind in its own interest. But whether it be priestcraft or whether it +be capitalism which seeks to bind the human mind, it comes to the same +thing, and the effort must be met by the assertion that, in spite of +errors and blunders, and the serious harm these may do, there is no way +for men to advance save by using the best powers of thinking they +possess, and proclaiming their conclusions to others. Speaking +theologically for the moment, God has given us our reasoning powers, and +also the impulse to use them, and it is inconceivable that He should +seek to restrict their use, or should give to anyone the power to forbid +their use. It is His truth which we seek, and His which we proclaim. In +so doing we perform our highest act of faith, and we refuse to be +troubled by the idea that for this service He will reward us by an +eternity of sulphur and brimstone. + +Throughout the remainder of this book it will be assumed that the reader +accepts this point of view, or, at any rate, that he is willing for +purposes of experiment to give it a trial and see where it leads him. We +shall proceed to consider the problems of human life in the light of +reason, to determine how they come to be, and how they can be solved. + + + + +CHAPTER IV + +THE ORIGIN OF MORALITY + + (Compares the ways of nature with human morality, and tries to show + how the latter came to be.) + + +Seventy years ago Charles Darwin published his book, "The Origin of +Species," in which he defied the theological dogma of his time by the +shocking idea that life had evolved by many stages of progress from the +diatom to man. This of course did not conform to the story of the Garden +of Eden, and so "Darwinism" was fought as an invention of the devil, and +in the interior of America there are numerous sectarian colleges where +the dread term "evolution" is spoken in awed whispers. Only the other +day I read in my newspaper the triumphant proclamation of some clergyman +that "Darwinism" had been overthrown. This reverend gentleman had got +mixed up because some biologists were disputing some detail of the +method by which the evolution of species had been brought about. Do +species change by the gradual elimination of the unfit, or do they +change by sudden leaps, the "mutation" theory of de Vries? Are acquired +powers transmitted to posterity, or is the germ plasm unaffected by its +environment? Concerning such questions the scientists debate. But the +fact that life has evolved in an ordered series from the lower forms to +the higher, and that each individual reproduces in embryo and in infancy +the history of this long process--these facts are now the basis of all +modern thinking, and as generally accepted as the rotation of the earth. + +You may study this process of evolution from the outside, in the +multitude of forms which it has assumed and in their reactions one to +another; or you may study it from the inside in your own soul, the +emotions which accompany it, the impulse or craving which impels it, the +_élan vital_, as it is called by the French philosopher Bergson. The +Christians call it love, and Nietzsche, who hated Christianity, called +it "the will to power," and persuaded himself that it was the opposite +of love. + +You will find in the essays of Professor Huxley, one entitled +"Evolution and Ethics," in which he sets forth the complete unmorality +of nature, and declares that there is no way by which what mankind knows +as morality can have originated in the process of nature or can be +reconciled to natural law. This statement, coming from a leading +agnostic, was welcome to the theologians. But when I first read the +essay, as a student of sixteen, it seemed to me narrow; I thought I saw +a standpoint from which the contradiction disappeared. The difference +between the morality of Christ and the morality of nature is merely the +difference between a lower and a higher stage of mental development. The +animal loves and seeks by instinct to preserve the life which it +knows--that is to say, its own life and the life of its young. The wolf +knows nothing about the feelings of a deer; but man in his savage state +develops reasoning powers enough to realize that there are others like +himself, the members of his own tribe, and he makes for himself taboos +which forbid him to kill and eat the members of that tribe. At the +present time humanity has developed its reason and imaginative sympathy +to include in the "tribe" one or two hundred million people; while to +those outside the tribe it still preserves the attitude of the wolf. + +How came it that a mind so acute as Huxley's went so far astray on the +question of the evolution of morality? The answer is that this was the +factory age in England, and the great scientist, a rebel in theological +matters, was in economics a child of his time. We find him using the +formulas of bourgeois biology to ridicule Henry George and his plea for +the freeing of the land. "Competition is the life of trade," ran the +nineteenth century slogan; and competition was the god of nineteenth +century biology. Tennyson summed it up in the phrase: "Nature red in +tooth and claw with ravin;" and this was found convenient by Manchester +manufacturers who wished to shut little children up for fourteen hours a +day in cotton mills, and to harness women to drag cars in the coal +mines, and to be told by the learned men of their colleges and the holy +men of their churches that this was "the survival of the fittest," it +was nature's way of securing the advancement of the race. + +But now we are preparing for an era of cooperation, and it occurs to our +men of science to go back to nature and find out what really are her +ways. If you will read Kropotkin's "Mutual Aid as a Factor in +Evolution," you will find a complete refutation of the old bourgeois +biology, and a view of nature which reveals in it the germs of human +morality. Kropotkin points out that everywhere throughout nature it is +the social and not the solitary animals which are most numerous and most +successful. There are many millions of ants and bees for every hawk or +eagle, and certainly in the state of nature there were thousands of deer +for every lion or tiger that preyed upon them. And all these social +creatures have their ways of being, which it requires no stress of the +imagination to compare with the tribal customs and the moral codes of +mankind. The different animals prey upon one another, but they do not +prey upon their own species, except in a few rare cases. The only beast +that makes a regular practice of exploiting his own kind is man. + +By hundreds of interesting illustrations Kropotkin shows that mutual aid +and mutual self-protection are the means whereby the higher forms of +being have been evolved. Insects and birds and fish, nearly all the +herbivorous mammals, and even a great many of the carnivores, help one +another and protect one another. The chattering monkeys in the treetops +drove out the saber-tooth tiger from the grove because there were so +many of them, and when they saw him they all set up a shriek and clamor +which deafened and confused him. And when by and by these monkeys +developed an opposed thumb, and broke off a branch of a tree for a club, +and fastened a sharp stone on the end of it for an axe, and fell upon +the saber-toothed tiger and exterminated him, they did it because they +had learned solidarity--even as the workers of the world are today +learning solidarity in the face of the beast of capitalism. + +Man has survived by the cunning of his brain, we are told, and that is +true. But first among the products of that cunning brain has been the +knowledge that by himself he is the most helpless and pitiful of +creatures, while standing together and forming societies and developing +moralities, he is master of the world. He has not yet learned that +lesson entirely; he has learned it only for his own nation. Therefore he +takes the highest skill of his hand and the subtlest wit of his brain, +and uses them to manufacture poison gases. At the present hour he is +painfully realizing that his poison formulas all become known to the +tribes whom he calls his enemies, and so it is his own destruction he is +engaged in contriving. In other words, man has come to a time when his +mechanical skill, his mastery over the forces of nature, has developed +more rapidly than his moral sense and his imaginative sympathy. His +ability to destroy life has become dangerously greater than his desire +to preserve it. So he confronts the fair face of nature as an insane +creature, wrecking not merely everything that he himself has built up, +but everything that nature has built in the ages before him. He is +striving now with infinite agony to make this fact real to himself, and +to mend his evil ways; and the first step in that process is to root out +from his mind the devil's doctrine which in his blindness and greed he +has himself implanted, that there is any way for him to find real +happiness, or to make any worth while progress on this earth, by the +method of inflicting misery and torment upon his fellow men. + + + + +CHAPTER V + +NATURE AND MAN + + (Attempts to show how man has taken control of nature, and is + carrying on her processes and improving upon them.) + + +If the argument of the preceding chapter is sound, human morality is not +a fixed and eternal set of laws, but is, like everything else in the +world, a product of natural evolution. We can trace the history of it, +just as we trace the story of the rocks. It is not a mysterious or +supernatural thing, it is simply the reaction of man to his environment, +and more especially to his fellow men. The source of it is that same +inner impulse, that love of life, that joy in growing, that faith which +appears to be the soul of all being. + +Man is a part of nature and a product of nature; in many fundamental +respects his ways are still nature's ways and his laws still nature's +laws. But there are other and even more significant ways in which man +has separated himself from nature and made himself something quite +different. In order to reveal this clearly, we draw a distinction +between nature and man. This is a proper thing to do, provided we bear +in mind that our classification is not permanent or final. We +distinguish frogs from tadpoles, in spite of the fact that at one stage +the creature is half tadpole and half frog. We distinguish the animal +from the vegetable kingdom, despite the fact that in their lower forms +they cannot be distinguished. + +What, precisely, is the difference between nature and man? The +difference lies in the fact that nature is apparently blind in her +processes; she produces a million eggs in order to give life to one +salmon, she produces countless millions of salmon to be devoured by +other fish apparently no better than salmon. Poets may take up the +doctrine of evolution and dress it out in theological garments, talking +about the "one far off divine event towards which the whole creation +moves," but for all we can see, nature, apart from man, is just as well +satisfied to move in circles, and to come back exactly where she +started. Nature made a whole world of complicated creatures in the +steamy, luke-warm swamps of the Mesozoic era, and then, as if deciding +that the pattern of a large body and a small brain was not a success, +she froze them all to death with a glacial epoch, and we have nothing +but the bones to tell us about them. + +No one understands anything about evolution until he has realized that +the phrase "the survival of the fittest" does not mean the survival of +the best from any human point of view. It merely means the survival of +those capable of surviving in some particular environment. We consider +our present civilization as "fit"; but if astronomical changes should +cause another ice age, we should discover that our "fitness" depended +upon our ability to live on lichens, or on something we could grow by +artificial light in the bowels of the earth. + +So much for our ancient mother, nature. But now--whether we say with the +theologians that it was divine providence, or with the materialist +philosophers that it was an accidental mixing of atoms--at any rate it +has come about that nature has recently produced creatures who are +conscious of her process, who are able to observe and criticize it, to +take up her work and carry it on in their own way, for better or for +worse. Whether by accident or design, there has been on parts of our +planet such a combination of climate and soil as has brought into being +a new product of nature, a heightened form of life which we call +"intelligence." Creation opens its eyes, and beholds the work of the +creator, and decides that it is good--yet not so good as it might be! +Creation takes up the work of the creator, and continues it, in many +respects annulling it, in other respects revising it entirely. Whether a +sonnet is a better or a higher product than a spider is a question it +would be futile to discuss; but this, at least, should be clear--nature +has produced an infinity of spiders, but nature never produced a sonnet, +nor anything resembling it. + +Man, the creature of God, takes over the functions of God. This fact may +shock us, or it may inspire us; to the metaphysically minded it offers a +great variety of fascinating problems. Can it be that God is in process +of becoming, that there is no God until he has become, in us and through +us? H. G. Wells sets forth this curious idea; and then, of course, the +bishops and the clergy rise up in indignation and denounce Mr. Wells as +an upstart and trespasser upon their field. They have been worshipping +their God for some three or four thousand years, and know that He has +been from eternity; He created the world at His will, and how shall +impious man presume to rise up and criticize His product, and imagine +that he can improve upon it? Man, with his cheap and silly little toys, +his sonnets and scientific systems, his symphony concerts and such pale +imitations of celestial harmonies! + +Mr. Wells, in his character of God in the making, has created a bishop +of his own, and no doubt would maintain the thesis that he is a far +better bishop than any created by the God of the Anglican churches. We +will leave Mr. Wells' bishop to argue these problems with God's bishops, +and will merely remind the reader of our warning about these +metaphysical matters. You can prove anything and everything, whichever +and however, all or both; and discussions of the subject are merely your +enunciation of the fact that you have your private truth as you want it. +It may be that there is an Infinite Consciousness, which carries the +whole process of creation in itself, and that all the seeming wastes and +blunders of nature can be explained from some point of view at present +beyond the reach of our minds. On the other hand it may be that +consciousness is now dawning in the universe for the first time. It may +be that it is an accident, a fleeting product like the morning mist on +the mountain top. On the other hand, it may be that it is destined to +grow and expand and take control of the entire universe, as a farmer +takes control of a field for his own purposes. It may be that just as +our individual fragments of intelligence communicate and merge into a +family, a club, a nation, a world culture, so we shall some day grope +our way toward the consciousness of other planets, or of other states of +being subsisting on this planet unknown to us, or perhaps even toward +the cosmic soul, the universal consciousness which we call God. + +But meantime, all we can say with positiveness is this: man, the +created, is becoming the creator. He is taking up the world purpose, he +is imposing upon it new purposes of his own, he is attempting to impose +upon it a moral code, to test it and discipline it by a new standard +which he calls economy. To the present writer this seems the most +significant fact about life, the most fascinating point of view from +which life can be regarded. The reader who wishes to follow it into +greater detail is referred to a little book by Professor E. Ray +Lankester, "The Kingdom of Man"; especially the opening essay, with its +fascinating title, "Nature's Insurgent Son." + +In what ways have the reasoned and deliberate purposes of man revised +and even supplanted the processes of nature? The ways are so many that +it would be easier to mention those in which he has not done so. A +modern civilized man is hardly content with anything that nature does, +nor willing to accept any of nature's products. He will not eat nature's +fruits, he prefers the kinds that he himself has brought into being. He +is not content with the skin that nature has given him; he has made +himself an infinite variety of complicated coverings. He objects to +nature's habit of pouring cold water upon him, and so he has built +himself houses in which he makes his own climate; he has recently taken +to creating for himself houses which roll along the ground, or which fly +through the air, or which swim under the surface of the sea; so he +carries his private climate with him to all these places. It was +nature's custom to remove her blunders and her experiments quickly from +her sight. But man has decided that he loves life so well that he will +preserve even the imbeciles, the lame and the halt and the blind. In a +state of nature, if a man's eyes were not properly focused, he blundered +into the lair of a tiger and was eaten. But civilized man despises such +a method of maintaining the standard of human eyes; he creates for +himself a transparent product, ground to such a curve that it corrects +the focus of his eyes, and makes them as good as any other eyes. In ten +thousand such ways we might name, man has rebelled against the harshness +of his ancient mother, and has freed himself from her control. + +But still he is the child of his mother, and so it is his way to act +first, and then to realize what he has done. So it comes about that very +few, even of the most highly educated men, are aware how completely the +ancient ways of nature have been suppressed by her "insurgent son." It +is a good deal as in the various trades and professions which have +developed with such amazing rapidity in modern civilization; the paper +man knows how to make paper, the shoe man knows how to make shoes, the +optician knows about grinding glasses, but none of these knows very much +about the others' specialties, and has no realization of how far the +other has gone. So it comes about that in our colleges we are still +teaching ancient and immutable "laws of nature," which in the actual +practice of men at work are as extinct and forgotten as the dodo. In all +colleges, except a few which have been tainted by Socialist thought, +the students are solemnly learning the so-called "Malthusian law," that +population presses continually upon the limits of subsistence, there are +always a few more people in every part of the world than that part of +the world is able to maintain. At any time we increase the world's +productive powers, population will increase correspondingly, so there +can never be an end to human misery, and abortion, war and famine are +simply nature's eternal methods of adjusting man to his environment. + +Thus solemnly we are taught in the colleges. And yet, nine out of ten of +the students come from homes where the parents have discovered the +modern practice of birth control; all the students are themselves +finding out about it in one way or another, and will proceed when they +marry to restrict themselves to two or three children. In vain will the +ghost of their favorite statesman and hero, Theodore Roosevelt, be +traveling up and down the land, denouncing them for the dreadful crime +of "race suicide"--that is to say, their presuming to use their reason +to put an end to the ghastly situation revealed by the Malthusian law, +over-population eternally recurring and checked by abortion, war and +famine! In vain will the ghost of their favorite saint and moralist, +Anthony Comstock, be traveling up and down the land, putting people in +jail for daring to teach to poor women what every rich woman knows, and +for attempting to change the entirely man-made state of affairs whereby +an intelligent and self-governing Anglo-Saxon land is being in two or +three generations turned over to a slum population of Italians, Poles, +Hungarians, Portuguese, French-Canadians, Mexicans and Japanese! + +Likewise in every orthodox college the student is taught what his +professors are pleased to call "the law of diminishing returns of +agriculture." That is to say, additional labor expended upon a plot of +land does not result in an equal increase of produce, and the increase +grows less, until finally you come to a time when no matter how much +labor you expend, you can get no more produce from that plot of land. +All professors teach this, because fifty years ago it was true, and +since that time it has not occurred to any professor of political +science to visit a farm. And all the while, out in the suburbs of the +city where the college is located, market gardeners are practicing on an +enormous scale a new system of intensive agriculture which makes the +"law of diminishing returns" a foolish joke. + +As Kropotkin shows in his book, "Fields, Factories and Workshops," the +modern intensive gardener, by use of glass and the chemical test-tube, +has developed an entirely new science of plant raising. He is +independent of climate, he makes his own climate; he is independent of +the defects of the soil, he would just as soon start from nothing and +make his soil upon an asphalt pavement. By doubling his capital +investment he raises, not twice as much produce, but ten times as much. +If his methods were applied to the British Isles, he could raise +sufficient produce on this small surface to feed the population of the +entire globe. + +So we see that by simple and entirely harmless devices man is in +position to restrict or to increase population as he sees fit. Also he +is in position to raise food and produce the necessities of life for a +hundred or thousand times as many people as are now on the earth. But +superstition ordains involuntary parenthood, and capitalism ordains that +land shall be held out of use for speculation, or shall be exploited for +rent! And this is done in the name of "nature"--that old nature of the +"tooth and claw," whose ancient plan it is "that they shall take who +have the power, and they shall keep who can"; that ancient nature which +has been so entirely suppressed and supplanted by civilized man, and +which survives only as a ghost, a skeleton to be resurrected from the +tomb, for the purpose of frightening the enslaved. When a predatory +financier wishes a fur overcoat to protect himself from the cold, or +when he hires a masseur to keep up the circulation of his blood, you do +not find him troubling himself about the laws of "nature"; never will he +mention this old scarecrow, except when he is trying to persuade the +workers of the world to go on paying him tribute for the use of the +natural resources of the earth! + + + + +CHAPTER VI + +MAN THE REBEL + + (Shows the transition stage between instinct and reason, in which + man finds himself, and how he can advance to a securer condition.) + + +In the state of nature you find every creature living a precarious +existence, incessantly beset by enemies; and the creature survives only +so long as it keeps itself at the top of its form. The result is the +maintenance of the type in its full perfection, and, under the +competitive pressure, a gradual increase of its powers. Excepting when +sudden eruptions of natural forces occur, every creature is perfectly +provided with a set of instincts for all emergencies; it is in +harmonious relationship to its environment, it knows how to do what it +has to do, and even its fears and its pains serve for its protection. +But now comes man and overthrows this state of nature, abolishes the +competitive struggle, and changes at his own insolent will both his +environment and his reaction thereto. + +Man's changes are, in the beginning, all along one line; they are for +his own greater comfort, the avoidance of the inconveniences of nature +and the stresses of the competitive struggle. In a state of nature there +are no fat animals, but in civilization there are not merely fat +animals, but fat men to eat the fat animals. In a state of nature no +animal loafs very long; it has to go out and hunt its food again. But +man, by his superior cunning, compels the animals to work for him, and +also his fellow men. So he produces unlimited wealth for himself; not +merely can he eat and drink and sleep all he wants, but he builds a +whole elaborate set of laws and moral customs and religious codes about +this power, he invents manners and customs and literatures and arts, +expressive of his superiority to nature and to his fellow men, and of +his ability to enslave and exploit them. So he destroys for his +imperious self the beneficent guardianship which nature had maintained +over him; he develops a thousand complicated diseases, a thousand +monstrous abnormalities of body and mind and spirit. And each one of +these diseases and abnormalities is a new life of its own; it develops +a body of knowledge, a science, and perhaps an art; it becomes the means +of life, the environment and the determining destiny of thousands, +perhaps millions, of human beings. So continues the growth of the +colossal structure which we call civilization--in part still healthy and +progressive, but in part as foul and deadly as a gigantic cancer. + +What is to be done about this cancer? First of all, it must be +diagnosed, the extent of it precisely mapped out and the causes of it +determined. Man, the rebel, has rejected his mother nature, and has lost +and for the most part forgotten the instincts with which she provided +him. He has destroyed the environment which, however harsh to the +individual, was beneficent to the race, and has set up in the place of +it a gigantic pleasure-house, with talking machines and moving pictures +and soda fountains and manicure parlors and "gents' furnishing +establishments." + +Shall we say that man is to go back to a state of nature, that he shall +no longer make asylums for the insane and homes for the defective, +eye-glasses for the astigmatic and malted milk for the dyspeptic? There +are some who preach that. Among the multitude of strange books and +pamphlets which come in my mail, I found the other day a volume from +England, "Social Chaos and the Way Out," by Alfred Baker Read, a learned +and imposing tome of 364 pages, wherein with all the paraphernalia of +learning it is gravely maintained that the solution for the ills of +civilization is a return to the ancient Greek practice of infanticide. +Every child at birth is to be examined by a committee of physicians, and +if it is found to possess any defect, or if the census has established +that there are enough babies in the world for the present, this baby +shall be mercifully and painlessly asphyxiated. You might think that +this is a joke, after the fashion of Swift's proposal for eating the +children of famine-stricken Ireland. I have spent some time examining +this book before I risk committing myself to the statement that it is +the work of a sober scientist, with no idea whatever of fun. + +If we are going to think clearly on this subject, the first point we +have to understand is that nature has nothing to do with it. We cannot +appeal to nature, because we are many thousands of years beyond her +sway. We left her when the first ape came down from the treetop and +fastened a sharp stone in the end of his club; we bade irrevocable +good-bye to her when the first man kept himself from freezing and +altered his diet by means of fire. Therefore, it is no argument to say +that this, that, or the other remedy is "unnatural." Our choice will lie +among a thousand different courses, but the one thing we may be sure of +is that none of them will be "natural." Bairnsfather, in one of his war +cartoons, portrays a British officer on leave, who got homesick for the +trenches and went out into the garden and dug himself a hole in the mud +and sat shivering in the rain all night. And this amuses us vastly; but +we should be even more amused if any kind of reformer, physician, +moralist, clergyman or legislator should suggest to us any remedy for +our ills that was really "according to nature." + +Civilized man, creature of art and of knowledge, has no love for nature +except as an object for the play of his fancy and his wit. He means to +live his own life, he means to hold himself above nature with all his +powers. Yet, obviously, he cannot go on accumulating diseases, he cannot +give his life-blood to the making of a cancer while his own proper +tissues starve. He must somehow divert the flow of his energies, his +social blood-stream, so to speak, from the cancer to the healthy growth. +To abandon the metaphor, man will determine by the use of his reason +what he wishes life to be; he will choose the highest forms of it to +which he can attain. He will then, by the deliberate act of his own +will, devote his energies to those tasks; he will make for himself new +laws, new moral codes, new customs and ways of thought, calculated to +bring to reality the ideal which he has formed. So only can man justify +himself as a creator, so can he realize the benefit and escape the +penalties of his revolt from his ancient mother. + +And then, perhaps, we shall make the discovery that we have come back to +nature, only in a new form. Nature, harsh and cruel, wasteful and blind +as we call her, yet had her deep wisdom; she cared for the species, she +protected and preserved the type. Man, in his new pride of power, has +invented a philosophy which he dignifies by the name of "individualism." +He lives and works for himself; he chooses to wear silk shirts, and to +break the speed limit, and to pin ribbons and crosses on his chest. Now +what he must do with his new morality, if he wishes to save himself from +degeneration, is to manifest the wisdom and far vision of the old +mother whom he spurned, and to say to himself, deliberately, as an act +of high daring: I will protect the species, I will preserve the type! I +will deny myself the raptures of alcoholic intoxication, because it +damages the health of my offspring; I will deny myself the amusement of +sexual promiscuity for the same reason. I will devise imitations of the +chase and of battle in order that I may keep my physical body up to the +best standard of nature. Because I understand that all civilized life is +based upon intelligence, I will acquire knowledge and spread it among my +fellow men. Because I perceive that civilization is impossible without +sympathy, and because sympathy makes it impossible for me to be happy +while my fellow men are ignorant and degraded, therefore I dedicate my +energies to the extermination of poverty, war, parasitism and all forms +of exploitation of man by his fellows. + +Professor William James is the author of an excellent essay entitled "A +Moral Equivalent for War." He sets forth the idea that men have loved +war through the ages because it has called forth their highest efforts, +has made them more fully aware of the powers of their being. He asks, +May it not be possible for man, of his own free impulse, born of his +love of life and the wonderful potentialities which it unfolds, to +invent for himself a discipline, a code based, not upon the destruction +of other men and their enslavement, but upon cooperative emulation in +the unfoldment of the powers of the mind? That this can be done by men, +I have never doubted. That it will be done, and done quickly, has been +made certain by the late world conflict, which has demonstrated to all +thinking people that the progress of the mechanical arts has been such +that man is now able to inflict upon his own civilization more damage +than it is able to endure. + + + + +CHAPTER VII + +MAKING OUR MORALS + + (Attempts to show that human morality must change to fit human + facts, and there can be no judge of it save human reason.) + + +Assuming the argument of the preceding chapters to be accepted, it +appears that human life is in part at least a product of human will, +guided by human intelligence. Man finds himself in the position of the +crew of a ship in the middle of the ocean; he does not know exactly how +the ship was made, or how it came to be in its present position, but he +has discovered how the engines are run, and how the ship is steered, and +the meaning of the compass. So now he takes charge of the ship, and +keeps it afloat amid many perils; and meantime, on the bridge of the +vessel, there goes on a furious argument over the question what port the +ship shall be steered to and what chart shall be used. + +It is not well as a rule to trust to similes, but this simile is useful +because it helps us to realize how fluid and changeable are the +conditions of man's life, and how incessant and urgent the problems with +which he finds himself confronted. The moral and legal codes of mankind +may be compared to the steering orders which are given to the helmsman +of the vessel. Northeast by north, he is told; and if during the night a +heavy wind arises, and pushes the bow of the vessel off to starboard, +then the helmsman has to push the wheel in the opposite direction. If he +does not do so, he may find that his vessel has swung around and is +going to some other part of the world. Next morning the passengers may +wake up and find the ship on the rocks--because the helmsman persisted +in following certain steering directions which were laid down in an +ancient Hebrew book two or three thousand years ago! + +If life is a continually changing product, then the laws which govern +conduct must also be continually changing, and morality is a problem of +continuous adjustment to new circumstances and new needs. If man is free +to work upon this changing environment, he must be free to make new +tools and devise new processes. If it is the task of reason to choose +among many possible courses and many possible varieties of life, then +clearly it is man's duty to examine and revise every detail of his laws +and customs and moral codes. + +This is, of course, in flat contradiction to the teachings of all +religions. So far as I know there is no religion which does not teach +that the conduct of man in certain matters has been eternally fixed by +some higher power, and that it is man's duty to conform to these rules. +It is considered to be wicked even to suggest any other idea; in fact, +to do so is the most wicked thing in the world, far more dangerous than +any actual infraction of the code, whatever it may be. + +Let us see how this works out in practice. Let us take, for a test, the +Ten Commandments. These commandments were graven upon stone tablets some +four thousand years ago, and are supposed to have been valid ever since. +"Thou shalt not kill," is one; others phrase it, "Thou shall do no +murder"; and in this double version we see at once the beginnings of +controversy. If you are a Quaker, you accept the former version, while +if you are a member of the military general staff of your country you +accept the latter. You maintain the right to kill your fellow men, +provided that those who do the killing have been previously clad in a +special uniform, indicating their distinctive function as killers of +their fellow men. You maintain, in other words, the right of making war; +and presently, when you get into making war, you find yourself +maintaining the right to kill, not merely by the old established method +of the sword and the bullet, but by means of poison gases which destroy +the lives of women and children, perhaps a whole city full at a time. + +And also, of course, you maintain the right to kill, provided the +killing has been formally ordered and sanctioned by a man who sits upon +a raised bench and wears a black robe, and perhaps a powdered wig. You +consider that by the simple device of putting this man into a black robe +and a powdered wig, you endow him with authority to judge and revise the +divine law. In other words, you subject this divine law to human reason; +and if some religious fanatic refuses to be so subjected, you call him +by the dread name "pacifist," and if he attempts to preach his idea, you +send him to prison for ten or twenty years, which means in actual +practice that you kill him by the slow effects of malnutrition and +tubercular infection. If he is ordered to put on the special costume of +killing, and refuses to do so, you call him a "C. O.," and you bully and +beat him, and perhaps administer to him the "water cure" in your +dungeons. + +Or take the commandment that we shall not commit adultery. Surely this +is a law about which we can agree! But presently we discover that +unhappily married couples desire to part, and that if we do not allow +them to part, we actually cause the commission of a great deal more +adultery than otherwise. Therefore, our wise men meet together, and +revise this divine law, and decide that it is not adultery if a man +takes another wife, provided he has received from a judge an engraved +piece of paper permitting him to do so. But some of the followers of +religion refuse to admit this right of mere mortal man. The Catholic +Church attempts to enforce its own laws, and declares that people who +divorce and remarry are really living in adultery and committing mortal +sin. The Episcopal Church does not go quite so far as that; it allows +the innocent party in the divorce to remarry. Other churches are content +to accept the state law as it stands. Is it not manifest that all these +groups are applying human reason, and nothing but human reason, to the +interpreting and revising of their divine commandments? + +Or take the law, "Thou shalt not steal." Surely we can all agree upon +that! Let us do so; but our agreement gets us nowhere, because we have +to set up a human court to decide what is "stealing." Is it stealing to +seize upon land, and kill the occupants of it, and take the land for +your own, and hand it down to your children forever? Yes, of course, +that is stealing, you say; but at once you have to revise your +statement. It is not stealing if it was done a sufficient number of +years ago; in that case the results of it are sanctified by law, and +held unchangeable forever. Also, we run up against the fact that it is +not stealing, if it is done by the State, by men who have been dressed +up in the costume of killers before they commit the act. + +Again, is it stealing to hold land out of use for speculation, while +other men are starving and dying for lack of land to labor upon? Some of +us call this stealing, but we are impolitely referred to as "radicals," +and if we venture to suggest that anyone should resist this kind of +stealing, we are sentenced to slow death from malnutrition and +tubercular infection. Again, is it stealing for a victim of our system +of land monopoly to take a loaf of bread in order to save the life of +his starving child? The law says that this is stealing, and sends the +man to jail for this act; yet the common sense of mankind protests, and +I have heard a great many respectable Americans venture so far in +"radicalism" as to say that they themselves would steal under such +circumstances. + +One could pile up illustrations without limit; but this is enough to +make clear the point, that it is perfectly futile to attempt to talk +about "divine" rules for human conduct. Regardless of any ideas you may +hold, or any wishes, you are forced at every hour of your life to apply +your reason to the problems of your life, and you have no escape from +the task of judging and deciding. All that you do is to judge right or +to judge wrong; and if you judge wrong, you inflict misery upon yourself +and upon all who come into contact with you. How much more sensible, +therefore, to recognize the fact of moral and intellectual +responsibility; to investigate the data of life with which you have to +deal, the environment by which you are surrounded, and to train your +judgment so that you will be able to fit yourself to it with quickness +and certainty! + +"But," the believer in religion will say, "this leaves mankind without +any guide or authority. How can human beings act, how can they deal with +one another, if there are no laws, no permanent moral codes?" + +The answer is that to accept the idea of the evolution of morality does +not mean at all that there will be no permanent laws and working +principles. Many of the facts of life are fixed for all practical +purposes--the purposes not merely of your life and my life, but the life +of many generations. We are not likely to see in our time the end of the +ancient Hebrew announcement that "the sins of the father are visited +upon the children"; therefore it is possible for us to study out a +course of action based upon the duty of every father to hand down to his +children the gift of a sound mind in a sound body. The Catholic Church +has had for a thousand years or more the "mortal sin" of gluttony upon +its list; and today comes experimental science with its new weapons of +research, and discovers autointoxication and the hardening of the +arteries, and makes it very unlikely that the moral codes of men will +ever fail to list gluttony as a mortal sin. Indeed, science has added to +gluttony, not merely drunkenness, but all use of alcoholic liquor for +beverage purposes; we have done this in spite of the manifest fact that +the drinking of wine was not merely an Old Testament virtue, but a New +Testament religious rite. + +To say that human life changes, and that new discoveries and new powers +make necessary new laws and moral customs, is to say something so +obvious that it might seem a waste of paper and ink. Man has invented +the automobile and has crowded himself into cities, and so has to adopt +a rigid set of traffic regulations. So far as I know, it has never +occurred to any religious enthusiast to seek in the book of Revelation +for information as to the advisability of the "left hand turn" at +Broadway and Forty-second Street, New York, at five o'clock in the +afternoon. But modern science has created new economic facts, just as +unprecedented as the automobile; it has created new possibilities of +spending and new possibilities of starving for mankind; it has made new +cravings and new satisfactions, new crimes and new virtues; and yet the +great mass of our people are still seeking to guide themselves in their +readjustments to these new facts by ancient codes which have no more +relationship to these facts than they have to the affairs of Mars! + +I am acquainted with a certain lady, one of the kindest and most devoted +souls alive, who seeks to solve the problems of her life, and of her +large family of children and grand-children, according to sentences +which she picks out, more or less at random, from certain more or less +random chapters of ancient Hebrew literature. This lady will find some +words which she imagines apply to the matter, and will shut her devout +eyes to the fact that there are other "texts," bearing on the matter, +which say exactly the opposite. She will place the strangest and most +unimaginable interpretations upon the words, and yet will be absolutely +certain that her interpretation is the voice of God speaking directly to +her. If you try to tell her about Socialism, she will say, "The poor ye +have always with you"; which means that it is interfering with Divine +Providence to try to remedy poverty on any large scale. This lady is +ready instantly to relieve any single case of want; she regards it as +her duty to do this; in fact, she considers that the purpose of some +people's poverty is to provide her with a chance to do the noble action +of relieving it. You would think that the meaning of the sentence, +"Spare the rod and spoil the child," would be so plain that no one +could mistake it; but this good lady understood it to mean that God +forbade the physical chastisement of children, and preferred them +"spoiled." She held this idea for half a lifetime--until it was pointed +out to her that the sentence was not in the Bible, but in "Hudibras," an +old English poem! + + + + +CHAPTER VIII + +THE VIRTUE OF MODERATION + + (Attempts to show that wise conduct is an adjustment of means to + ends, and depends upon the understanding of a particular set of + circumstances.) + + +Some years ago I used to know an ardent single tax propagandist who +found my way of arguing intensely irritating, because, as he phrased it, +I had "no principles." We would be discussing, for example, a protective +tariff, and I would wish to collect statistics, but discovered to my +bewilderment that to my single tax friend a customs duty was "stealing" +on the part of the government. The government had a right to tax land, +because that was the gift of nature, but it had no right to tax the +products of human labor, and when it took a portion of the goods which +anyone brought into a country, the government was playing the part of a +robber. Of course such a man was annoyed by the suggestion that in the +early stages of a country's development it might possibly be a good +thing for the country to make itself independent and self-sufficient by +encouraging the development of its manufactures; that, on the other +hand, when these manufactures had grown to such a size that they +controlled the government, it might be an excellent thing for the +country to subject them to the pressure of foreign competition, in order +to lower their value as a preliminary to socializing them. + +The reader who comes to this book looking for hard and fast rules of +life will be disappointed. It would be convenient if someone could lay +down for us a moral code, and lift from our shoulders the inconvenient +responsibility of deciding about our own lives. There may be persons so +weak that they have to have the conditions of their lives thus +determined for them; but I am not writing for such persons. I am writing +for adult and responsible individuals, and I bear in mind that every +individual is a separate problem, with separate needs and separate +duties. There are, of course, a good many rules that apply to everybody +in almost all emergencies, but I cannot think of a single rule that I +would be willing to say I would apply in my life without a single +exception. "Thou shalt not kill" is a rule that I have followed, so far +without exception; but as soon as I turn my imagination loose, I can +think of many circumstances under which I should kill. I remember +discussing the matter with a pacifist friend of mine, an out-and-out +religious non-resistant. I pointed out to him that people sometimes went +insane, and in that condition they sometimes seized hatchets and killed +anyone in sight. What would my pacifist friend do if he saw a maniac +attacking his children with a hatchet? It did not help him to say that +he would use all possible means short of killing the maniac; he had +finally to admit that if he were quite sure it was a question of the +life of the maniac or the life of his child, he would kill. And this is +not mere verbal quibbling, because such things do happen in the world, +and people are confronted with such emergencies, and they have to +decide, and no rule is a general rule if it has a single exception. +There is a saying that "the exception proves the rule," but this is very +silly; it is a mistranslation of the Latin word "probat," which means, +not proves, but tests. No exception can prove a rule. What the exception +does is to test the rule by showing that the result does not follow in +the exceptional case. + +The only kind of rule which can be laid down for human conduct is a rule +in such general terms that it escapes exceptions by leaving the matter +open for every man's difference of opinion. Any kind of rule which is +specific will sooner or later pass out of date. Take, by way of +illustration, the ancient and well-established virtue of frugality. +Obviously, under a state of nature, or of economic competition, it is +necessary for every man to lay by a store "for a rainy day." But suppose +we could set up a condition of economic security, under which society +guaranteed to every man the full product of his labor, and the old and +the sick were fully taken care of--then how foolish a man would seem who +troubled to acquire a surplus of goods! It would be as if we saw him +riding on horseback through the main street of our town in a full suit +of armor! + +I devote a good deal of space to this question of a fixed and +unchangeable morality, because it is one of the heaviest burdens that +mankind carries upon its back. The record of human history is sickening, +not so much because of blood and slaughter, but because of fanaticism; +because wherever the mind of man attempts to assert itself, to escape +from the blind rule of animal greed, it adopts a set of formulas, and +proceeds to enforce them, regardless of consequences, upon the whole of +life. Consider, for example, the rule of the Puritans in England. The +Puritans glorified conscience, and it is perfectly proper to glorify +conscience, but not to the entire suppression of the beauty-making +faculties in man. Macaulay summed up the Puritan point of view in the +sentence that they objected to bear-baiting, not because it gave pain to +the bear, but because it gave pleasure to the spectators. As a result of +applying that principle, and lacing mankind in a straight-jacket by +legislation, England swung back into a reaction under the Cavaliers, in +which debauchery held more complete sway than ever before or since in +English life. + +This is a hard lesson, but it must be learned: there is no virtue that +does not become a vice if it is carried to extremes; there is no virtue +that does not become a vice if it is applied at the wrong time, or under +the wrong circumstances, or at the wrong stage of human development. In +fact, we may say that most vices are virtues misapplied. The so-called +natural vices are simply natural impulses carried to excess, while the +unnatural vices result from the suppression and distortion of natural +impulses. The Greeks had as their supreme virtue what they called +"sophrosuné." It is a beautiful word, worth remembering; it means a +beautiful quality called moderation. We shall find, as we come to +investigate, that life is a series of compromises among many different +needs, many different desires, many different duties; and reason sits as +a wise and patient judge, and appoints to each its proper portion, and +denies to it an excess which would starve the others. Such is true +morality, and it is incompatible with the existence of any fixed code, +whether of human origin or divine. + +The fixed morality is a survival of a far-off past, of the days of +instinct and servitude. Human reason has developed but slowly, and +perhaps only a few people are as yet entirely capable of taking control +of their own destiny; perhaps it is really dangerous to think for +oneself! But if we investigate carefully, we may decide that the danger +is not so much to ourselves as it is to others. The most evil of all the +habits that man has inherited from his far-off past is the habit of +exploiting his fellows, and in order to exploit them more safely the +ruling castes of priests and kings and nobles and property owners have +taken possession of the moralities of the world and shaped them for +their own convenience. They have taught the slave virtues of credulity +and submission; they have surrounded their teachings with all the +terrors of the supernatural; they have placed upon rebellion the +penalties, not merely of this world, but of the next, not merely of the +dungeon and the rack, but of hellfire and brimstone. + +I do not wish to go to extremes and say that the moral codes now taught +in the world are made wholly in this evil way. As a matter of fact they +are a queer jumble of the two elements, the slave terrors of the past +and the common sense of the present. There is not one moral code in the +world today, there are many. There is one for the rich, and an entirely +different one for the poor, and the rich have had a great deal more to +do with shaping the code of the poor than the poor have had to do with +shaping the code of the rich. There is one code for governments, and an +entirely different one for the victims of governments. There is one code +for business, and an entirely different one, a far more human and decent +one, for friendship. Above all, there is one code for Sunday and another +code for the other six days of the week. Most of our idealisms and our +sentimental fine phrases we reserve for our Sunday code, while for our +every-day code we go back to the rule of the jungle: "Dog eat dog," or +"Do unto others as they would do unto you, but do it first." When you +attempt to suggest a new moral code to our present day moral +authorities, it is the fine phrases of the Sunday code they bring out +for exhibition purposes; and perhaps you are impressed by their +arguments--until Monday morning, when you attempt to apply this code at +the office, and they stare at you in bewilderment, or burst out laughing +in your face. + +What I am trying to do here is to outline a code that will not be a +matter of phrases but a matter of practice. It will apply to all men, +rich as well as poor, and to all seven days of the week. I am not so +much suggesting a code, as pointing out to you how you can work out your +own code for yourself. I am suggesting that you should adopt it, not +because I tell you to, but because you yourself have taken it and tested +it, precisely as you would test any other of the practical affairs of +your life--potatoes as an article of diet, or some particular sack of +potatoes that a peddler was trying to sell to you. It is not yet +possible for you to be as sure about everything in your life as you can +be about a sack of potatoes; human knowledge has not got that far; but +at least you can know what is to be known, and if anything is a matter +of uncertainty, you can know that. Such knowledge is often the most +important of all--just as the driver of an automobile wants to know if a +bridge is not to be depended on. + +So I say to you that if you want to find happiness in this life, look +with distrust upon all absolutes and ultimates, all hard and fast rules, +all formulas and dogmas and "general principles." Bear in mind that +there are many factors in every case, there are many complications in +every human being, there are many sides to every question. Try to keep +an open mind and an even temper. Try to take an interest in learning +something new every day, and in trying some new experiment. This is the +scientific attitude toward life; this is the way of growth and of true +success. It is inconvenient, because it involves working your brains, +and most people have not been taught to do this, and find it the hardest +kind of work there is. But how much better it is to think for yourself, +and to protect yourself, than to trust your thinking to some group of +people whose only interest may be to exploit you for their advantage! + + + + +CHAPTER IX + +THE CHOOSING OF LIFE + + (Discusses the standards by which we may judge what is best in + life, and decide what we wish to make of it.) + + +We have made the point about evolution, that it may go forward or it may +go backward. There is no guarantee in nature that because a thing +changes, it must necessarily become better than it was. On the contrary, +degeneration is as definitely established a fact as growth, and it is of +the utmost importance, in studying the problem of human happiness and +how to make it, to get clear the fact that nature has produced, and +continues to produce, all kinds of monstrosities and parasites and +failures and abortions. And all these blunders of our great mother +struggle just as hard, desire life just as ardently as normal creatures, +and suffer just as cruelly when they fail. Blind optimism about life is +just as fatuous and just as dangerous as blind pessimism, and if we +propose to take charge of life, and to make it over, we shall find that +we have to get quickly to the task of deciding what our purpose is. + +"Choose well, your choice is brief and yet endless," says Carlyle. You +are driven in your choice by two facts--first, that you have to choose, +regardless of whether you want to or not; and second, that upon your +choice depend infinite possibilities of happiness or of misery. The +interdependence of life is such that you are choosing not merely for the +present, but for the future; you are choosing for your posterity +forever, and to some extent you are choosing for all mankind. Matthew +Arnold has said that "Conduct is three-fourths of life"; but I, for my +part, have never been able to see where he got his figures. It seems to +me that conduct is practically everything in life that really counts. +Conduct is not merely marriage and birth and premature death; it is not +merely eating and drinking and sleeping: it is thinking and aspiring; it +is religion and science, music and literature and art. It is not yet the +lightning and the cyclone, but with the spread of knowledge it is coming +to be these things, and I suspect that some day it may be even the comet +and the rising of the sun. + +We are now going to apply our reason to this enormous problem of human +conduct; we are going to ask ourselves the question: What kind of life +do we want? What kind of life are we going to make? What are the +standards by which we may know excellence in life, and distinguish it +from failure and waste and blunder in life? Obviously, when we have done +this, we shall have solved the moral problem; all we shall have to say +is, act so that your actions help to bring the desirable things into +being, and do not act so as to hinder or weaken them. + +We shall not be able to go to nature to settle this question for us. +This is our problem, not nature's. But we shall find, as usual, that we +can pick up precious hints from her; we shall be wise to study her ways, +and learn from her successes and her failures. We are proud of her +latest product, ourselves. Let us see how she made us; what were the +stages on the way to man? + +First in the scale of evolution, it appears, came inert matter. We call +it inert, because it looks that way, though we know, of course, that it +consists of infinite numbers of molecules vibrating with speed which we +can measure even though we cannot imagine it. This "matter" is +enormously fascinating, and a wise man will hesitate to speak +patronizingly about it. Nevertheless, considering matter apart from the +mind which studies it, we decide that it represents a low stage of +being. We speak contemptuously of stones and clods and lumps of clay. We +award more respect to things like mountains and tempest-tossed oceans, +because they are big; in the early days of our race we used to worship +these things, but now we think of them merely as the raw material of +life, and we should not be in the least interested in becoming a +mountain or an ocean. + +Almost everyone would agree, therefore, that what we call "life" is a +higher and more important achievement of nature. And if we wish to grade +this life, we do so according to its sentience--that is to say, the +amount and intensity of the consciousness which grows in it. We are +interested in the one-celled organisms which swarm everywhere throughout +nature, and we study the mysterious processes by which they nourish and +beget themselves; we suspect that they have a germ of consciousness in +them; but we are surer of the meaning and importance of the +consciousness we detect in some complex organism like a fish or bird. +We learn to know the signs of consciousness, of dawning intelligence, +and we esteem the various kinds of creatures according to the amount of +it they possess. We reject mere physical bigness and mere strength. +Joyce Kilmer may write: + + "Poems are made by men like me, + But only God can make a tree"-- + +And that seems to us a charming bit of fancy; but the common sense of +the thing is voiced to us much better in the lines of old Ben Jonson: + + "It is not growing like a tree + In bulk doth make man better be." + +If we take two animals of equal bulk, the hippopotamus and the elephant, +we shall be far more interested in the elephant, because of the +intelligence and what we call "character" which he displays. There are +good elephants and bad elephants, kind ones and treacherous ones. We +love the dog because we can make a companion of him; that is, because we +can teach him to react to human stimuli. Of all animals we are +fascinated most by the monkey, because he is nearest to man, and +displays the keenest intelligence. + +Someone may say that this is all mere human egotism, and that we have no +way of really being sure that the life of elephants and hippopotami is +not more interesting and significant than the life of men. Never having +been either of these animals, I cannot say with assurance; but I know +that I have the power to exterminate these creatures, or to pen them in +cages, and they are helpless to protect themselves, or even to +understand what is happening to them. So I am irresistibly driven to +conclude that intelligence is more safe and more worth while than +unintelligence; in short, that intelligence is nature's highest product +up to date, and that to foster and develop it is the best guess I can +make as to the path of wisdom--that is, of intelligence! + +When we come to deal with human values, we find that we can trace much +the same kind of evolution. Back in the days of the cave man, it was +physical strength which dominated the horde; but nowadays, except in the +imagination of the small boy, the "strong man" does not cut much of a +figure. We go once, perhaps, to see him lift his heavy weights and +break his iron bars, but then we are tired of him. Mere strength had to +yield in the struggle for life to quickness of eye and hand, to energy +which for lack of a better name we may call "nervous." The pugilist who +has nothing but muscle goes down before his lighter antagonist who can +keep out of his reach, and the crowd loves the football hero who can +duck and dodge and make the long runs. One might cite a thousand +illustrations, such as the British bowmen breaking down the heavily +armored knights, or the quick-moving, light vessels of Britain +overcoming the huge galleons of Spain. And as society develops and +becomes more complex, the fighting man becomes less and less a man of +muscle, and more and more a man of "nerve." Alexander, Cæsar and +Napoleon would have stood a poor chance in personal combat against many +of their followers. They led, because they were men of energy and +cunning, able to maintain the subtle thing we call prestige. + +Now the world has moved into an industrial era, and who are the great +men of our time, the men whose lightest words are heeded, whose doings +are spread upon the front pages of our newspapers? Obviously, they are +the men of money. We may pretend to ourselves that we do not really +stand in awe of a Morgan or a Rockefeller, but that we admire, let us +say, an Edison or a Roosevelt. But Edison himself is a man of money, and +will tell you that he had to be a man of money in order to be free to +conduct his experiments. As for our politicians and statesmen, they +either serve the men of money, or the men of money suppress them, as +they did Roosevelt. The Morgans and the Rockefellers do not do much +talking; they do not have to. They content themselves with being obeyed, +and the shaping of our society is in their hands. + +And yet, some of us really believe that there are higher faculties in +man than the ability to manipulate the stock market. We consider that +the great inventor, the great poet, the great moralist, contributes more +to human happiness than the man who, by cunning and persistence, +succeeds in monopolizing some material necessity of human life. "Poets," +says Shelley, "are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind." If this +strange statement is anywhere near to truth, it is surely of importance +that we should decide what are the higher powers in men, and how they +may be recognized, and how fostered and developed. + +What is, in its essence, the process of evolution from the lower to the +higher forms of mental life? It is a process of expanding consciousness; +the developing of ability to apprehend a wider and wider circle of +existence, to share it, to struggle for it as we do for the life we call +our "own." The test of the higher mental forms is therefore a test of +universality, of sympathetic inclusiveness; or, to use commoner words, +it is a test of enlightened unselfishness. + +Every human individual has the will to life, the instinct of +self-preservation, which persuades him that he is of importance; but the +test of his development is his ability to realize that, important though +he may be, he is but a small part of the universe, and his highest +interests are not in himself alone, his highest duties are not owed to +himself alone. And as the life becomes more of the intellect, this fact +becomes more and more obvious, more and more dominating. Men who +monopolize the material things of the world and their control are +necessarily self-seeking; but in the realm of the higher faculties this +element, in the very nature of the case, is forced into the background. +It is evident that truth is not truth for the Standard Oil Company, nor +for J. P. Morgan and Company, nor yet for the government of the United +States; it is truth for the whole of mankind, and one who sincerely +labors for the truth does so for the universal benefit. + +There may be, of course, an element of selfishness in the activities of +poets and inventors. They may be seeking for fame; they may be hoping to +make money out of their discoveries; but the greatest men we know have +been dominated by an overwhelming impulse of creation, and when we read +their lives, and discover in them signs of petty vanity or jealousy or +greed, we are pained and shocked. What touches us most deeply is some +mark of self-consecration and humility; as, for example, when Newton +tells us that after all his life's labors he felt himself as a little +child gathering sea-shells on the shore of the great ocean of truth; or +when Alfred Russel Wallace, discovering that Darwin had been working +longer than himself over the theory of the origin of species, generously +withdrew and permitted the theory to go to the world in Darwin's name. + +There are three faculties in man, usually described as intellect, +feeling and will. According as one or the other faculty predominates, +we have a great scientist, a great poet, or a great moralist. We might +choose a representative of each type--let us say Newton, Shakespeare and +Jesus--and spend much time in controversy as to which of the three types +is the greatest, which makes the greatest contribution to human +happiness. But it will suffice here to point out that the three +faculties do not exclude one another; every man must have all three, and +a perfectly rounded man should seek to develop all three. Jesus was +considerable of a poet, and we should pay far less heed to Shakespeare +if he had not been a moralist. Also there have been instances of great +poets and painters who were scientists--for example, Leonardo and +Goethe. + +The fundamental difference between the scientist and the poet is that +one is exploring nature and discovering things which actually exist, +whereas the other is creating new life out of his own spirit. But the +poet will find that his creations take but little hold upon life, if +they are not guided and shaped by a deep understanding of life's +fundamental nature and needs--in other words, if the poet is not +something of a scientist. And in the same way, the very greatest +discoveries of science seem to us like leaps of creative imagination; as +if the mind had completed nature, through some intuitive and sympathetic +understanding of what nature wished to be. + +The point about these higher forms of human activity is that they renew +and multiply life. We may say that if Jesus had never lived, others +would have embodied and set forth with equal poignancy the revolutionary +idea of the equality of all men as children of one common father. And +perhaps this is true; but we have no way of being sure that it is true, +and as we look back upon the last nineteen hundred years of human +history, we are unable to imagine just what the life of mankind during +those centuries would have been if Jesus had died when he was a baby. We +do not know what modern thought might have been without Kant, or what +modern music might have been without Beethoven. We are forced to admit +that if it had not been for the patient wisdom and persuasive kindness +of Lincoln, the Slave Power might have won its independence, and America +today might have been a military camp like Europe, and the lives and +thoughts of every one of us would have been different. + +Or take the activities of the poet. Many years ago the writer was asked +to name the men who had exercised the greatest influence upon him, and +after much thought he named three: Jesus, Hamlet and Shelley. And now +consider the significance of this reply. One of these people, Shelley, +was what we call a "real" person; that is, a man who actually lived and +walked upon the earth. Concerning Hamlet, it is believed there was once +a Prince of Denmark by that name, but the character who is known to us +as Hamlet is the creation of a poet's brain. As to the third figure, +Jesus, the authorities dispute. Some say that he was a man who actually +lived; others believe that he was God on earth; yet others, very +learned, maintain that he is a legendary name around which a number of +traditions have gathered. + +To me it does not make a particle of difference which of the three +possibilities happens to be true about Jesus. If he was God on earth, he +was God in human form, under human limitations, and in that sense we are +all gods on earth. And whether he really lived, or whether some poet +invented him, matters not a particle so far as concerns his effect upon +others. The emotions which moved him, the loves, the griefs, the high +resolves, existed in the soul of someone, whether his name were Jesus or +John; and these emotions have been recorded in such form that they +communicate themselves to us, they become a part of our souls, they make +us something different from what we were before we encountered them. + +In other words, the poet makes in his own soul a new life, and then +projects it into the world, and it becomes a force which makes over the +lives of millions of other people. If you read the vast mass of +criticism which has grown up about the figure of Hamlet, you learn that +Hamlet is the type of the "modern man." Shakespeare was able to divine +what the modern man would be; or perhaps we can go farther and say that +Shakespeare helped to make the modern man what he is; the modern man is +more of Hamlet, because he has taken Hamlet to his heart and pondered +over Hamlet's problem. Or take Don Quixote. No doubt the follies of the +"age of chivalry" would have died out of men's hearts in the end; but +how much sooner they died because of the laughter of Cervantes! Or take +"Les Miserables." Our prison system is not ideal by any means, but it is +far less cruel than it was half a century ago, and we owe this in part +to Victor Hugo. Every convict in the world is to some degree a happier +man because of this vision which was projected upon the world from the +soul of one great poet. No one can estimate the part which the writings +of Tolstoi have played in the present revolution in Russia, but this we +may say with certainty: there is not one man, woman or child in Russia +at the present moment who is quite the same as he would have been if +"Resurrection" had never been written. + +In discussing the highest faculties of man we have so far refrained from +using the word "genius." It is a word which has been cheapened by +misuse, but we are now in position to use it. The things which we have +just been considering are the phenomena of genius--and we can say this, +even though we may not know exactly what genius is. Perhaps it is, as +Frederic Myers asserts, a "subliminal uprush," the welling up into the +consciousness of some part of the content of the subconscious mind. Or +perhaps it is something of what man calls "divine." Or perhaps it is the +first dawning, the first hint of that super-race which will some day +replace mankind. Perhaps we are witnessing the same thing that happened +on the earth when glimmerings of reason first broke upon the mind of +some poor, bewildered ape. We cannot be sure; but this much we can say: +the man of genius represents the highest activity of the mind of which +we as yet have knowledge. He represents the spirit of man, fully +emancipated, fully conscious, and taking up the task of creation; taking +human life as raw material, and making it over into something more +subtle, more intense, more significant, more universal than it ever was +before, or ever would have been without the intervention of this new +God-man. + + + + +CHAPTER X + +MYSELF AND MY NEIGHBOR + + (Compares the new morality with the old, and discusses the relative + importance of our various duties.) + + +So now we may say that we know what are the great and important things +in life. Slowly and patiently, with infinite distress and waste and +failure, but yet inevitably, the life of man is being made over and +multiplied to infinity, by the power of the thinking mind, impelled by +the joy and thrill of the creative action, and guided by the sense of +responsibility, the instinct to serve, which we call conscience. To +develop these higher faculties is the task we have before us, and the +supreme act to which we dedicate ourselves. + +So now we are in position to define the word moral. Assuming that our +argument be accepted, that action is moral which tends to foster the +best and highest forms of life we know, and to aid them in developing +their highest powers; that is immoral which tends to destroy the best +life we know, or to hinder its rapid development. + +Let us now proceed to apply these tests to the practices of man; first +as an individual, and then as a social being. What are my duties to +myself, and what are my duties to the world about me? + +You will note that these questions differ somewhat from those of the old +morality. Jesus told us, first, that we should love the Lord our God, +and, second, that we should love our neighbor as ourself. Some would say +that modern thought has dismissed God from consideration; but I would +prefer to say that modern thought has decided that the place where we +encounter God most immediately is in our own miraculously expanding +consciousness. Our duty toward God is our duty to make of ourselves the +most perfect product of the Divine Incarnation that we can become. Our +duty to our neighbor is to help him to do the same. + +Of course, as we come to apply these formulas, we find that they overlap +and mingle inextricably; the two duties are really one duty looked at +from different points of view. We decide that we owe it to ourselves to +develop our best powers of thinking, and we discover that in so doing we +make ourselves better fitted to live as citizens, better equipped to +help our fellow men. We go out into our city to serve others by making +the city clean and decent, and we find that we have helped to save +ourselves from a pestilence. + +The most commonly accepted, or at any rate the most commonly preached, +of all formulas is the "golden rule," "Do unto others as you would have +them do unto you." This formula is good so far as it goes, but you note +that it leaves undetermined the all-important question, what _ought_ we +to want others to do unto us. If I am an untrained child, what I would +have others do unto me is to give me plenty of candy; therefore, under +the golden rule, my highest duty becomes to distribute free candy to the +world. The "golden rule" is obviously consistent with all forms of +self-indulgence, and with all forms of stagnation; it might result in a +civilization more static than China. + +Or let us take the formula which the German philosopher Kant worked out +as the final product of his thinking: "Act so that you would be willing +for your action to become a general rule of conduct." Here again is the +same problem. There are many possible general rules of conduct. Some +would prefer one, some others; and there is no possible way of escape +from the fact that before men can agree what to do, they must decide +what they wish to make of their lives. + +To the formula of Jesus, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself," the +answer is obvious enough: "Suppose my neighbor is not worthy of as much +love as myself?" To be sure, it is a perilous thing for me to have to +decide this question; nevertheless, it may be a fact that I am a great +inventor, and that my neighbor is a sexual pervert. There is, of course, +a sense in which I may love him, even so; I may love the deeper +possibilities of his nature, which religious ecstasy can appeal to and +arouse. But in spite of all ecstasies and all efforts, it may be that +his disease--physical, mental and moral--has progressed to such a point +that it is necessary to confine him, or to castrate him, or even to +asphyxiate him painlessly. To say that I must love such a man as myself +is, to say the least, to be vague. We can see how the indiscriminate +preaching of such a formula would open the flood-gates of sentimentality +and fraud. + +Modern thinking says: Thou shalt love the highest possibilities of life, +and thou shalt labor diligently to foster them; moreover, because life +is always growing, and new possibilities are forever dawning in the +human spirit, thou shalt keep an open mind and an inquiring temper, and +be ready at any time to begin life afresh. + +Such is the formula. It is not simple; and when we come to apply it, we +find that it constantly grows more complex. When we attempt to decide +our duty to ourselves, we find that we have in us a number of different +beings, each with separate and sometimes conflicting duties and needs. +We have in us the physical man and the economic man, and these clamor +for their rights, and must have at least a part of their rights, before +we can go on to be the intellectual man, the moral man, or the artistic +man. So our life becomes a series of compromises and adjustments between +a thousand conflicting desires and duties; between the different beings +which we might be, but can be only to a certain extent, and at certain +times. We shall see, as we come to investigate one field after another +of human activity, that we never have an absolute certainty, never an +absolute right, never an absolute duty; never can we shut our eyes, and +go blindly ahead upon one course of action, to the exclusion of every +other consideration! On the contrary, we sit in the seat of +self-determination as a highly trained and skillful engineer. We keep +our eyes upon a dozen different gauges; we press a lever here and touch +a regulator there; we decide that now is a time for speed, and now for +caution; and knowing all the time that the safety, not merely of +ourselves, but of many passengers, depends upon the decisions of each +moment. + + + + +CHAPTER XI + +THE MIND AND THE BODY + + (Discusses the interaction between physical and mental things, and + the possibility of freedom in a world of fixed causes.) + + +It is our plan, so far as possible, to discuss the problems of the mind +in one section of this book, and the problems of the body in another; +but just as we found that we could not separate our duties to ourself +from our duties to our neighbors, so we find that the mind and the body +are inextricably interwoven, and that whenever we probe deeply into one, +we discover the other. The interaction of the mind and the body is a +fascinating problem into which we must look for a moment, not because we +expect to solve it, but because it illuminates the whole subject. + +The human body is a machine. It takes in carbon and oxygen, and burns +them, and gives out carbon dioxide and other waste products, and +develops energy in proportion to the amount of carbon it consumes. This +machine has its elaborate apparatus of action and reaction, its sensory +organs where outside stimuli are received, its nerves like telegraph +wires to carry these impressions, its brain cells to store them and to +transform them into reactions. We know to some extent how these brain +cells work. We know what portions of the brain are devoted to this or +that activity. We know that if we stick a pin into a certain spot we +shall paralyze the left forefinger. We know that by injecting a certain +drug, or by breathing a certain gas, we can cause this or that sensation +or reaction, such as laughing or weeping or mania. We know what poisons +are generated in the system by anger, and what chemical changes take +place in a muscle that is tired. All this is part of a vast new science +which is called bio-chemistry, or the chemistry of life. + +Our bodies, therefore, are part of the material universe, and subject to +the laws or ways of being of this universe. The first of these laws that +we know is the law of causation. Every change in the universe has its +cause, and that in turn had another cause; this chain is never broken, +no matter how far we go, and the same causes universally produce the +same effects. If you see a ball move on a billiard table, you know that +the ball did not move itself; you know that something struck the ball or +tilted the table. You discover that the motion of the ball moves the air +around it, and the waves of that motion are spread through the room. +They strike the walls, and the motion is carried on through the walls, +and if we had instruments sensitive enough, we could feel the motion of +that billiard ball at the other side of the world, and a few million +years from now at the most remote of the stars. This is what is called +the law of the conservation of energy, and when we discover something +like radium which seems to violate that law by giving out unlimited +quantities of energy, we investigate and discover a new form of energy +locked up in the atom. In the disintegration of the atom we have a +source of power which, when we have learned to use it, will multiply +perhaps millions of times the powers we are now able to use on this +earth. But energy, no matter how many times it is transformed, and in +what strange ways it reappears, always remains, and is never destroyed, +and never created out of nothing. + +My friend the great physiologist once took me into his laboratory and +showed me a little aquarium in which some minute creatures were wiggling +about--young sea-urchins, if I remember. The physiologist took a bottle +containing some chemical, and dropped a single drop into the water, and +instantly all these little black creatures, which had been darting +aimlessly in every direction through the water, turned and swam all in +one direction, toward the light. They swam until they touched the walls +of the aquarium, and there they stuck, trying their best to swim +farther. "And now," said my friend, "that is what we call a 'tropism,' +and all life is a tropism. What you see in that aquarium means that some +day we shall know just what combination of chemicals causes a human +being to move this way or that, to do this thing or that. When +bio-chemistry has progressed sufficiently, we shall be able to make +human qualities, perhaps in the sperm, perhaps in the embryo, perhaps +day by day by means of diet or injection." + +Said I: "Some day, when bio-chemistry has progressed far enough, you +will know what combination of chemicals causes a man to vote the +Democratic or Republican ticket." + +"Why not?" answered my friend. (He has a sense of humor about all things +except this sacred bio-chemistry.) + +Said I: "When you have got to that stage, keep the secret carefully, and +we will fix up a scheme, and a few days before election we will release +some gas in our big cities, and sweep the country for the Socialist +ticket." + +But jesting aside: if the human body is a material thing, existing in +the material world and subject to causation, there must be material +reasons for the actions of human bodies, just the same as for the moving +of billiard balls. We hear the sound of a billiard ball striking the +cushion, and we are prepared to accept the idea that the thing we call +hearing in us is caused by the impinging of sound waves upon our +eardrums. And if we investigate human beings in the mass, we find every +reason to believe that they act according to laws, and that there are +material causes for their acts. If you get up and shout fire in a +theater, you know how the audience will behave. If you study statistics, +you can say that in any large city a certain fixed number of human +beings are going to commit suicide every month; you can even say that +more are going to commit suicide in the month of June than in any other +month. You can say that more people are going to die at two o'clock in +the morning than at any other hour. You know that certain changes in the +weather will cause all human beings to behave in the same way. You know +that an increase of prices or an increase of unemployment will cause a +certain additional number of men to commit crimes, and a certain +additional number of women to become prostitutes. You know that if a man +overeats, his thoughts will change their color; he will have what he +calls "the blues." I might cite a thousand other illustrations to prove +that human minds are subject to material laws, and therefore to +investigation by the bio-chemists. + +But now, stop a moment. Here you sit reading a book. Something in the +book pleases you, and you say, "Good!" Perhaps you slap your knee or +clench your fist. Now here is a motion of your hand, which stirs the air +about you, and which, according to the laws of energy, will spread its +effects to the other side of the world, and even to the farthest of the +stars. Or perhaps the book makes you angry, and you throw it down in +disgust; an entirely different motion, which will affect the other side +of the world and the farthest of the stars in an entirely different +way. The machine of the universe will be forever altered because of that +slapping of your knee or that throwing down of your book. + +And what was the cause of these things? So far as we can see, the +material cause was exactly the same in each case--the reading of certain +letters. Two human beings, sitting side by side and reading exactly the +same letters, might be affected in exactly opposite ways. It seems +hardly rational to maintain that the material difference of two pairs of +eyes, moving over exactly the same set of letters, could have resulted +in two such different motions of the hands. As a matter of fact, the +very same letters may affect the same person in different ways. The +composer, Edward MacDowell, once told me how on his birthday his pupils +sent him a gift, with a card containing some lines from the opera +"Rheingold," beginning, "O singe fort"--that is, "Oh, sing on." But the +composer happened, when glancing at the card, to think French instead of +German, and got the message, "Oh, powerful monkey!" This, of course, was +disconcerting to a famous piano performer, and his pupils, if they had +been watching his face, would have seen an unexpected reaction. It seems +manifest, does it not, that the cause of this difference of reaction was +not any difference of the letters, but purely a difference of _thought_? +So it appears that thoughts may change the material universe; they may +break the chain of causation, and interfere with material events. + +Compare the two things, a state of consciousness and say, a steam +shovel. They are entirely different, and so far as we can see, entirely +incompatible and unrelated. Can anyone imagine how a thought can turn +into a steam shovel, or a steam shovel into a thought? We can understand +how a steam shovel lifts a mass of earth out of the ground, and we can +understand how a human hand moves a lever which causes the shovel to +act; but we are unable to conceive how a state of mind--whether it be a +desire for pay, or an ideal of service, or a vision of the Panama +Canal--can so affect a steam shovel as to cause it to move. We can sit +and think motion at a billiard ball for a thousand years, and it does +not move; but when we think motion at our hand, it moves instantly, and +passes on the motion to the billiard ball or the steam shovel. When fire +touches our hand it sends some kind of vibration to the brain, and in +some inconceivable way that vibration is turned into a state of +consciousness called pain, and that is turned, "as quick as thought," +into another kind of motion, the jerking back of our hand. + +So it seems certain that consciousness really does "butt in" on the +chain of natural causation. And yet, just see in what position this +leaves the scientist who is investigating life! Imagine if you can, the +plight of a doctor who wanted to prescribe a diet for a sick person, if +he knew that every piece of chicken and every piece of fish were free to +decide of its own impulse whether or not it would be digested in the +human stomach. But the plight of this doctor would be nothing to the +plight of the chemist or the biologist or the engineer who was asked to +do his thinking and his planning in a world containing a billion and a +quarter human beings, each one a lawless agent, each one a source of new +and unforeseeable energies, each one acting as a "first cause," and +starting new chains of activity, tearing the universe to pieces +according to his own whims. What kind of a universe would that be? It +would simply be a chaos; there could be no thinking, there could be no +life in it; there could be no two things the same in it, and no laws of +any sort. + +So then we fall back into the hands of the "determinists," who assert +one unbreakable chain of natural causation, and regard the human body as +an automaton. We go back to the bio-chemist, who purposes some day to +ascertain for us just exactly what molecules of matter in just what +positions and combinations in the brain cells of William Shakespeare +caused him to perpetrate a mixed metaphor. We go back to the belief that +human beings act as they must act, because the clock of life, wound up +and started, must move in such and such a fashion. + +But now, let us see what are the implications of that theory! Here am I +writing a book, appealing to men to act in certain ways. Of course, I +know that not all will follow my advice. Some will be foolish--or what +seems to me foolish. Others will be weak, and will resolve to act in +certain ways, and then go and act in other ways. But some will be just; +some will be free; some will use their brains--because, you see, I am +convinced that they _can_ use their brains! I am convinced that ideas +will affect and stir them, in complete defiance of the bio-chemist, who +tells me that they act that way because of certain chemicals in their +brain cells, and that I write my book because of other chemicals, and +that my idea that I am writing the book because I want to write it is a +delusion, and that the whole thing is happening just so because the +universe was wound up that way. + +Now, this an unsolved problem, and I have no solution to offer. What I +have set forth is in substance one of the four "antinomies" of Kant, and +you can see for yourself how it is possible to prove either side, and +impossible to be sure of either. Perhaps there is really a duality in +life. Perhaps there are two aspects of the universe, the material and +the spiritual, and perhaps they do not really interact as they seem to, +but both are guided and determined by some higher reality of life of +which we know nothing. In that case there would really be a chemical +equivalent for every thought, and there would be a trace of +consciousness for every material atom in the universe. Maybe the +theologians are right, and in the universal consciousness of God the +whole future exists predetermined. Maybe to God there is no such thing +as time; the past, the present, and the future are all alike to Him. + +There is nothing more painful to the human mind than to have to confess +its own impotence. Yet I can see no escape from the dilemma we are here +facing. There is not a man alive who does not assume the freedom of the +will, who does not show in all his acts that he agrees with old Dr. +Samuel Johnson: "We know we are free and there's an end on't." Without a +belief in freedom we cannot get beyond the animal, we cannot become the +masters of our own souls. And yet, the man who swallows that idea whole, +and goes out into the world and preaches personal morality to the +neglect of the fundamental economic facts, the facts of the body in its +relationship to all other bodies--we know what happens to that man; he +becomes a shouting fool. Unless he is literally a fool, or a knave, he +quickly discovers his own futility, and proceeds to use his common +sense, in spite of all his theories. "Come to Jesus!" cried William +Booth, and he went out in the streets of London to save souls with a +bass drum; but presently, in day by day contact with the degradation of +the London slums, he realized that he could not save souls so long as +those souls were dwelling in starved and lousy bodies. So William Booth +with his Salvation Army took to starting night shelters and cast-off +clothing bureaus! + +And of exactly the same sort is the bewilderment which falls to the lot +of the scientist who is honest and willing to face the facts. The +bio-chemist with his test tubes and his microscopes and his complex +apparatus of research sits himself down and accumulates a mass of +information about the human body. He investigates the diseases of the +body and learns in detail just how these diseases spread and sometimes +how they are caused; he can present you with a diagnosis, showing the +exact stage to which the degeneration of a certain organ has proceeded, +and perhaps he can suggest to you a change of diet or some drug which +will, for a time at least, check the process of the breakdown. But in +other cases he will be perfectly helpless; he will be, as it were, +buried under the mass of detail which he has accumulated; he will find +the vital energy depressed, and he will not know any way to renew it. +But along will come some mental specialist, who in a half hour's talk +with the patient, by a simple change in the patient's _ideas_, will +completely make over the patient's life, and set going a new vital +process which will restore the body to its former health. A religious +enthusiast may do this, a psychotherapist may do it, a moral genius may +do it; and the physician with all his learning will find himself like a +man on the outside of a house, peering in through the windows and trying +in vain to find out something about the life of the family and its +guests. + +This is humiliating to the chemist and the medical man, but they have to +face it, because it is a fact. In the seat of authority over the human +body there sits a higher being which, without any religious +implications, we may call the soul; or, if it is impossible to get away +from the religious implication of that word, we will call it the +consciousness, or the personality. This master of the house of life is +in many ways dependent upon the house. If the furnace goes out he +freezes, and if the house takes fire and burns up--well, he disappears +and leaves no address. But in other ways the master of the house is +really master, and is a worker of miracles. He does things which we do +not at all understand, and cannot yet even foresee, but which often +completely make the house over. + +William James, a scientist of real authority, has a wonderful essay, +"The Powers of Men," in which he sets forth the fact that human beings +as a general rule make use of only a small portion of the energies which +dwell in their beings, and that one of our problems is to find the ways +by which we can draw upon stores of hidden energy which we have within +us. Also, in a fascinating book, "Varieties of the Religious +Experience," James has endeavored to study and analyze the phenomena +which hitherto the physician and the biologist have been disposed to +ridicule and neglect. But unless I am mistaken, every scientist in the +end will be forced to come back to the central fact, that life is a +unity, and that the heart of it is the spirit; that what we call the +will is not an accident, not a delusion, not some by-product of nature, +but is the very secret of life; and that behind it is a vast ocean of +power, which now and then sweeps away all dykes, and floods into the +human consciousness. + +The writer of this book is now a patient and plodding teacher of a +certain economic doctrine, a preacher of what he might call +anti-parasitism. He has come to the conclusion that the habit of men to +enslave their fellows and exploit them and draw their substance from +them without return--that this habit is destructive to all civilization, +and is incompatible with any of the higher forms of life, intellectual, +moral or artistic. He has come to the conclusion that there is no use +attempting to build a structure of social life until there is a sound +foundation; in other words, until the capitalist system has been +replaced by cooperation. But in his youth he was, or thought he was, a +poet, and touched upon that strange and wonderful thing which we call +genius. He saw his own consciousness, as it were a leaf driven before a +mighty tempest of spiritual energy. And he believes that this experience +was no delusion, but was a revelation of the hidden mysteries of being. +He still has memories of this startling experience, still hints of it in +his consciousness; something still leaps in his memory, like a +race-horse, or like the war-horse of Revelations, which "scenteth the +battle afar off, the thunder of the captains and the shouting." Because +of these things he can never accept any philosophy which shackles the +human spirit, he will never in his thought attempt to set bounds to the +possibilities of human life. The very heart of life beats in us, the +wonder of it and the glory of it swells like a tide behind us. New +universes are born in us, or, if you prefer, they are made by us; and +the process is one of endless joy, of rapture beyond anything that the +average man can at present imagine, or that any instruments invented by +science can weigh or measure. + + + + +CHAPTER XII + +THE MIND OF THE BODY + + (Discusses the subconscious mind, what it is, what it does to the + body, and how it can be controlled and made use of by the + intelligence.) + + +The importance of the mind in matters of health becomes clearer when we +understand that what we commonly call our minds--the mental states which +confront us day by day in our consciousness--are really but a small +portion of our total mind. In addition to this conscious mind there is +an enormous mass of our personality which is like a storehouse attached +to our dwelling, a place to which we do not often go, but to which we +can go in case of need. This storehouse is our memory, the things we +know and can recall at will. And then there is another, still vaster +storehouse--no one has ever measured or guessed the size of it--which +apparently contains everything that we have ever known, perhaps also +everything that our ancestors have known. A common simile for the human +mind is that of an iceberg; a certain portion of it appears above the +surface of the sea, but there is seven times as much of it floating out +of sight under the water. + +This subconscious mind seems to be the portion most closely united with +the body. It has its seat in the back parts of the brain, in the spinal +cord and the greater nervous ganglia, such as the solar plexus. It is +the portion of our mind which controls the activities of our body, all +those miraculous things which went on before we first opened our eyes to +the light, and which go on while we sleep, and never cease until we die. +When we cut our finger and admit foreign germs to our blood, some +mysterious power causes millions of our blood corpuscles to be rushed to +this spot, to destroy and devour the invading enemy. We do not know how +this is done, but it is an intelligent act, measured and precisely +regulated, as much so as a railroad time-table. When the supply of +nourishment in the body becomes low, something issues a notice by way of +our stomach, which we call hunger; when we take food into the stomach, +something pours out the gastric juice to digest it; when this digested +food is prepared and taken up in the blood stream, something decides +what portion of it shall be turned into muscle, what into brain cells, +what into hair, what into finger nails. Sometimes, of course, mistakes +are made and we have diseases. But for the most part all this infinitely +intricate process goes on day and night without a hitch, and it is all +the work of what we might call "the mind of the body." + +And just as our material bodies are the product of an age-long process +of development repeated in embryo by every individual, so is this mental +life a product of long development, and carries memories of this far-off +process. In our instincts there dwells all the past, not merely of the +human race, but of all life, and if we should ever succeed in completely +probing the subconscious mind and bringing it into our consciousness, it +would be the same as if we were free to ramble about in all the past. +Huxley set forth the fact that all the history of evolution is told in a +piece of chalk; and we probably do not exaggerate in saying that all the +history of the universe is in the subconscious mind of every human +being. When the partridge which has just come out of the egg sees the +shadow of the hawk flit by and crouches motionless as a leaf, the +partridge is not acting upon any knowledge which it has acquired in the +few minutes since it was hatched. It is acting upon a knowledge +impressed upon its subconscious mind by the experience of millions of +partridges, perhaps for tens of thousands of years. When the physician +lifts the newly born infant by its ankle and spanks it to make it cry, +the physician is using his conscious reason, because he has learned from +previous experience, or has been taught in the schools that it is +necessary for the child's breathing apparatus to be instantly cleared. +But when the child responds to the spanking with a yell, it is not moved +by reasoned indignation at an undeserved injury; it is following an +automatic reaction, as a result of the experience of infants in the +stone age, experience which in some obscure way has been registered and +stored in the infant cerebellum. + +Science is now groping its way through this underworld of thought. +Obviously we should have here a most powerful means of influencing the +body, if by any chance we could control it. We are continually seeking +in medical and surgical ways to stimulate or to retard activities of the +body, which are controlled entirely by this subconscious mind. If we are +suffering intense pain in a joint, we put on a mustard plaster, what we +call a counter-irritant, to trouble the skin and draw the congested +blood away from the place of the pain. On the other hand, we may +stimulate the functions of the intestines by the application of hot +fomentations, to bring the blood more actively to that region. But if by +any means we could make clear our wishes to the subconscious mind, we +should be dealing with headquarters, and should get quicker and more +permanent results. + +Can we by any possibility do this? To begin with, let me tell you of a +simple experiment that I have witnessed. I once knew a man who had +learned to control the circulation of his blood by his conscious will. I +have seen him lay his two hands on the table, both of the same color, +and without moving the hands, cause one hand to turn red and the other +to turn pale. And, obviously, so far as this man is concerned, the +problem of counter-irritants has been solved. He is a mental mustard +plaster. + +And what was done by this man's own will can be done to others in many +ways. The most obvious is a device which we call hypnotism. This is a +kind of sleep which affects only the conscious control of the body, but +leaves all the senses awake. In this hypnotic sleep or "trance" we +discover that the subconscious mind is a good deal like the Henry Dubb +of the Socialist cartoons; it is faithful and persistent, very strong in +its own limited field, but comically credulous, willing to believe +anything that is told it, and to take orders from any one who climbs +into the seat of authority. You have perhaps attended one of the +exhibitions which traveling hypnotists are accustomed to give in country +villages. You have seen some bumpkin brought upon the stage and +hypnotized, and told that he is in the water and must swim for his life, +or that he is in the midst of a hornets' nest, or that his trousers are +torn in the seat--any comical thing that will cause an audience to howl +with laughter. + +These facts were first discovered nearly a hundred and fifty years ago +by a French doctor named Mesmer. He was a good deal of a charlatan, and +would not reveal his secrets, and probably the scientific men of that +time were glad to despise him, because what he did was so new and +strange. There is a certain type of scientific mind which sits aloft on +a throne with a framed diploma above its head, and says that what it +knows is science and what it does not know is nonsense. And so +"mesmerism" was left for the quacks and traveling showmen. But half a +century later a French physician named Liébault took up this method of +hypnotism, without all the fakery that had been attached to it. He +experimented and discovered that he could cure not merely phobias and +manias, fixed ideas, hysterias and melancholias; he could cure definite +physical diseases of the physical body, such as headache, rheumatism, +and hemorrhage. Later on two other physicians, Janet and Charcot, +developed definite schools of "psychotherapy." They rejected hypnotism +as in most cases too dangerous, but used a milder form which is known as +"hypnoidization." You would be surprised to know how many ailments which +baffle the skill of medical men and surgeons yield completely to a +single brief treatment by such a mental specialist. + +All that is necessary is some method to tap the subconscious mind. In +many cases the subconsciousness knows what is the matter, and will tell +at once--a secret that is completely hidden from the consciousness. For +example, a man's hands shake; they have been shaking for years, and he +has no idea why, but his subconscious mind explains that they first +began to shake with grief over the death of his wife; also, the +subconscious mind meekly and instantly accepts the suggestion that the +time for grief is past, and that the hands will never shake again. + +Or here is a woman who has become convinced that worms are crawling all +over her. Everything that touches her becomes a worm, even the wrinkles +in her dress are worms, and she is wild with nervousness, and of course +is on the way to the lunatic asylum. She is hypnotized and sees the +operator catching these worms one by one and killing them. She is told +that he has killed the last, but she insists, "No, there is one more." +The operator clutches that one, and she is perfectly satisfied, and +completely cured. Her husband writes, expressing his relief that he no +longer has to "sleep every night in a fish pond." This instance with +many others is told by Professor Quackenbos in his book, "Hypnotic +Therapeutics." + +Among the most powerful means to influence the subconscious personality +is religious excitement. Religion has come down to us from ancient +times, and its fears and ecstasies are a part of our instinctive +endowment. Those who can sway religious emotions can cure disease, not +merely fixed ideas, but many diseases which appear to be entirely +physical, but which psycho-analysis reveals to be hysterical in nature. +Of course these religious persons who heal by laying on of hands or by +purely mental means deny indignantly that they are using hypnotism or +anything like it. I am aware that I shall bring upon myself a flood of +letters from Christian Scientists if I identify their methods of curing +with "animal magnetism" and "manipulation," and other devices of the +devil which they repudiate. All I can say is that their miracles are +brought about by affecting the subconscious mind; there is no other way +to bring them about, and for my part I cannot see that it makes a great +difference whether the subconscious mind is affected by a hand laid on +the forehead, or by a hand waved in the air, or by an incantation +pronounced, or by a prayer thought in silence. If you can persuade the +subconscious mind that God is operating upon it, that God is omnipotent +and is directing this particular healing, that is the most powerful +suggestion imaginable, and is the basis of many cures. But if in order +to achieve this, it is necessary for me to persuade myself that I can +find some meaning in the metaphysical moonshine of Mother Eddy--why, +then, I am very sorry, but I really prefer to remain sick. + +But such is not the case. You do not have to believe anything that is +not true; you simply have to understand the machinery of the +subconscious, and how to operate it. We are only beginning to acquire +that knowledge, and we need an open mind, free both from the dogmatism +of the medical men and the fanaticism of the "faith curists." A few +years ago in London I met a number of people who were experimenting in +an entirely open-minded way with mental healing, and I was interested in +their ideas. I happened to be traveling on the Continent, and on the +train my wife was seized by a very dreadful headache. She was lying with +her head in my lap, suffering acutely, and I thought I would try an +experiment, so I put my hand upon her forehead, without telling her what +I was doing, and concentrated my attention with the greatest possible +intensity upon her headache. I had an idea of the cause of it; I +understood that headaches are caused by the irritation of the sensory +nerves of the brain by fatigue poisons, or other waste matter which the +blood has not been able to eliminate. I formed in my mind a vivid +picture of what the blood would have to do to relieve that headache, and +I concentrated my mental energies upon the command to her subconscious +mind that it should perform these particular functions. In a few +minutes my wife sat up with a look of great surprise on her face and +said, "Why, my headache is gone! It went all at once!" + +That, of course, might have been a coincidence; but I tried the +experiment many times, and it happened over and over. On another +occasion I was able to cure the pain of an ulcerated tooth; I was able +to cure it half a dozen times, but never permanently, it always +returned, and finally the tooth had to come out. My wife experimented +with me in the same way, and found that she was able to cure an attack +of dyspepsia; but, curiously enough, she at once gave herself a case of +dyspepsia--something she had never known in her life before. So now I +will not allow her to experiment with me, and she will not allow me to +experiment with her! But we are quite sure that people with psychic +gifts can definitely affect the subconscious mind of others by purely +mental means. We are prepared to believe in the miracles of the New +Testament, and in the wonders of Lourdes, as well as in the healings of +the Christian Scientists and the New Thoughters, which cannot be +disputed by any one who is willing to take the trouble to investigate. +We can face these facts without losing our reason, without ceasing to +believe that everything in life has a cause, and that we can find out +this cause if we investigate thoroughly. + + + + +CHAPTER XIII + +EXPLORING THE SUBCONSCIOUS + + (Discusses automatic writing, the analysis of dreams, and other + methods by which a whole new universe of life has been brought to + human knowledge.) + + +One of the most common methods of exploring the subconscious mind is the +method of automatic writing. I have never tried this myself, but tens of +thousands of people are sitting every night with a "ouija" in front of +them, holding a pencil on a piece of paper and letting their +subconscious minds write what they please. Most of them are hoping to +get messages from the dead--a problem which we shall discuss in the next +chapter. Suffice it for the moment to say that automatic writing and +table rapping and other devices of mediumship have opened up to us a +vast mass of subconscious mentality. A part of the scientific world +still takes a contemptuous attitude and calls this all humbug, but many +of our greatest scientists have been persuaded to investigate, and have +become convinced that in this mass of subconsciousness there is mingled, +not merely the mind of the medium, but the minds of all those present, +and possibly other minds as well. For my part, I do not see how any one +can study disinterestedly the proceedings of the Society for Psychical +Research and not become convinced that telepathy at least is one of the +powers of the subconscious mind. + +Telepathy is what is popularly known as "thought transmission." Every +one must know people who are what is called "psychic," and will know +what is happening to some friend in another part of the world, or will +go upstairs because they "sense" that some one wants them, or will go to +the door because they "have a hunch" that some one is coming. And maybe +these things are only chance, but you will be unscientific if you do not +take the trouble to read and learn what modern investigators have +brought out on such subjects. + +This much is certain, and is denied by no competent investigator: +whatever has been in your mind is there still, and it is possible to +find a way of tapping the buried memory. An old woman, delirious with +fever, begins to babble in a strange language, and it is discovered that +she is talking ancient Hebrew. The woman is entirely illiterate, and her +conscious memory knows no language but her own, her conscious mind has +no ideas beyond those of her domestic life and the gossip of the +village. But investigation is made, and it is discovered that when this +woman was a girl, she worked in the home of a Hebrew scholar, and heard +him reading aloud. She did not understand a word of what she heard, and +was not consciously listening to it; nevertheless, every syllable of it +had been stored away forever by her subconscious mind. Innumerable cases +of this sort have been established; and, as a matter of fact, we might +have been prepared for such discoveries by the memory-feats of the +conscious mind. It is well known that Mozart, when a child, could listen +to a new opera, and go home and play it over note for note. At present +there is a child in America, giving exhibitions in public, carrying on +thirty games of chess at the same time. There have been others who do +sums of mental arithmetic, such as multiplying thirty-two figures by +thirty-two figures, or reciting the Bible backwards. + +All this seems incredible; and yet there is something still more +incredible. Suppose that these same powers, which are stored in our +subconscious minds, were stored also in the minds of animals! A few +years ago Maurice Maeterlinck published a book, "The Unknown Guest," in +the course of which he tells about his experiments with the so-called +Elberfeld horses: two animals which had been trained for years by their +owner to give signals by moving their forefeet, and which apparently +could count and divide and multiply large sums, and extract square and +cube root, and spell out names, and recognize sounds, scents and colors, +and read time from the face of a watch. Of course, it is easy to say +that this is absurd, that the horses must have got some signals from +their trainer; but, as it happened, they would do their work in the +absence of their trainer; they would do it in the dark, or with a sack +over their heads, and the best scientific minds of Germany were unable +to suggest any test conditions which could not be met. There have been +many gigantic frauds in the world, and this may have been one of them; +on the other hand, there have been many new discoveries, and for my part +I will finish exploring the miracles of the subconscious mind of man, +before I presume to say that anything is impossible in the subconscious +mind of a horse or a dog. Also I will wait for some learned person to +explain to me how the subconscious minds of horses and dogs know enough +to build and repair their bones and teeth, so cleverly that modern +architectural and engineering science could teach them nothing. I ask, +also, if it is possible to find a region in the subconsciousness which +is common to two people, why is it absurd to suggest that there might be +a region common to a man and a horse? Why is this any more absurd than +that they should eat the same food and breathe the same air and feel the +same affection and be frightened at the same dangers? + +The only persons who will be dogmatic about such subjects are the +persons who are ignorant. Those who take the trouble to investigate, +discover more wonderful things every day, and they realize that we have +here a whole universe of knowledge, to which we have as yet barely +opened the doors. Consider, for example, the facts which we are +acquiring on the subject of personality and what it means. You would +say, perhaps, that if there is anything you know positively, it is that +you are one person, and have never been anybody else, and that your body +belongs to you, and that nobody else ever has used or ever can use it. +But what would you say if I told you that tomorrow "you" might cease to +be, and somebody else might be in possession of your body, walking it +around and wearing its clothes and spending its money? What if I were to +tell you that there might be in "you," or in your body, half a dozen +different personalities which you have never known or dreamed of, and +that tomorrow there might break out a war between them and "you," as to +which of the half dozen people should hear with your ears and speak with +your tongue and walk about with your clothes on? Unless you are familiar +with the literature of multiple personality, you would surely say that +this was unbelievable--quite as much so as a mathematical horse! + +Let us begin with the case of the Reverend Ansel Bourne, who was many +years ago a perfectly respectable clergyman in a Rhode Island town. One +day he disappeared, and his family did not hear of him. A year or two +later there was a store-keeper in a town in Pennsylvania, who suddenly +came to himself as the Reverend Ansel Bourne, not knowing what he had +been in the meantime, or how he came to be keeping a store. Under +hypnotism it developed that he had in him two personalities, and his +trance personality recollected all that had been happening in the +meantime and told about it freely. + +Or take the still more fascinating case of the young lady who is known +in the literature of psychotherapy as Miss Beauchamp. Her story is told +in a book, "The Dissociation of a Personality," by Dr. Morton Prince of +Boston. Some thirty years ago Miss Beauchamp, a very conscientious and +dignified young lady, became nervous and ill, and took to doing strange +things, which were a source of shame and humiliation to her. Under +hypnotism it was discovered to be a case of multiple personality. The +other personality, who finally gave herself the name of Sally, was +entirely different in character from Miss Beauchamp, being mischievous, +vain, and primitive as a child. She conceived an intense dislike for +Miss Beauchamp, whom she called by abusive names; at times when she +could get possession of Miss Beauchamp's body, she delighted in playing +humiliating tricks upon her enemy, spending her money, running her into +debt, breaking her engagements, disgracing her before her friends. Sally +was always well and Miss Beauchamp was always ill, and Sally would take +the body, for which they fought for possession, and take it for long and +exhausting walks, and leave it cold and miserable, lost and penniless, +in the possession of Miss Beauchamp! And of course this made Miss +Beauchamp more and more a wreck, and Sally took possession of more and +more of her time. Sally knew everything that Miss Beauchamp did and +thought, but Miss Beauchamp did not know about Sally. She only knew that +there were gaps in her life, during which she did things she could not +explain. And because she did not want her friends to think her insane, +she would try to hide this dreadful condition of affairs; but Sally +would spoil her plans by writing letters to her friends, and also by +writing insulting letters for Miss Beauchamp to find when she took +possession again. + +Then one day, after several years of treatment, there appeared yet +another personality, who knew nothing about Miss Beauchamp or Sally +either, and only knew what Miss Beauchamp had known up to some years +before. Miss Beauchamp had a college education, and wrote and spoke +French; Sally knew no French, and tried in vain to learn it; the new +personality did not have a college education at all. Nevertheless, +after long experiment, the story of which is as fascinating as any novel +you ever read, Dr. Prince discovered that this was the real Miss +Beauchamp; the others were "split off" personalities. He traced the +cause to a severe mental shock, and succeeded in the end in combining +the first Miss Beauchamp with the last, and in suppressing the obstinate +and wanton Sally. As you read this story, you watch him mentally +murdering a human being; "Sally" clamors pitifully for life, but he +condemns her to death, and relentlessly executes his sentence. It is a +"movie" thriller with a happy ending, and I should think it would make +disconcerting reading to persons who believe that each of us is one +immortal soul, or "has" one immortal soul, and is responsible for it to +a personal God. + +There is never any end to the problems of these multiple personalities, +and each case is a test of the judgment and ingenuity of the specialist. +He will try to make one personality "stick," and will fail, and will +have to accept another, or a combination of two. In one case, he found +that he could not get the right personality to "stick" except under +hypnosis, so he decided to leave the man in a mild state of trance, and +the new personality lived all the rest of its life in that condition. If +you wish to know more about this subject you can find books in any +well-equipped library. I mention one, "The Riddle of Personality," by H. +Addington Bruce, because it contains in the appendix an excellent list +of the literature of the subconscious in all its many aspects. + +There is another, and most fascinating method of exploring this +underworld of the mind, and that is the study of dreams. Some fifteen +years ago a psychotherapist in New York told me about the discoveries of +a physician in Vienna, and gave me some pamphlets, written in very +difficult and technical German. Since then this Professor Freud has been +translated, and has become a fad, and the absurdities of his followers +make one a little apologetic for him. But we do not give up Jesus +because of the torturers and bigots who call themselves Christians, and +in the same way we have no right to blame Freud for all the absurdities +of the psychoanalysts. + +Probably there never was a time in human history when there were not +people who interpreted dreams, and you can still buy "dream books" for +twenty-five cents, and learn that a white horse means that you are going +to get a letter from your sweetheart tomorrow; then you can buy another +dream book, telling you that a white horse means there is going to be a +death in your family within the year. Naturally this prejudices thinking +people against dream analysis; yet, dreams are facts, and every fact has +its cause, and if you dream about a white horse, there must assuredly be +some reason for your dreaming this particular thing. Of course we know +that if you eat mince-pie and welsh-rabbit at midnight, you will dream +about something terrible; but will it be snakes, or will it be a +railroad wreck, or will it be white horses trampling over you? +Obviously, it may be a million different unpleasant things; and what is +it that picks out this or that from the infinite store of your memory, +and brings it into the region of half-consciousness which we call the +dream? + +Professor Freud's discovery is in brief that the dream is a +wish-fulfillment. Our instincts present to our consciousness a great +mass of impulses and desires, and among these the consciousness selects +what it pleases, and represses and refuses to recognize or to act upon +the others. But maybe these decisions are not altogether satisfactory to +the subconsciousness. The mind of the body is in rebellion against the +mind--shall we say of reason, or shall we say of society? The mind of +society, otherwise known as the moral law, says that you shall be a good +little boy, and shall go to school and learn what you are told, and on +Sunday go to church and sit very still through a long sermon; whereas, +the body of a boy would rather be a savage, hunting birds' nests and +scalping enemies and exploring magic caves full of precious jewels. So +the subconsciousness of the boy, balked and miserable, awaits its time, +and finds its satisfaction when the boy is asleep and his moral censor +has relaxed its control. + +This dream mind is not a logical and orderly thing like the conscious +mind; it is not business-like and civilized, it does not deal in +abstractions. It is far more interested in things than in words; it does +not present us with formulas, but with pictures, and with stories of +weird and wonderful happenings. It is like the mind of the race, which +we study in legends and religions. It does not tell us that the sun is a +mass of incandescent hydrogen gas, so and so many miles in diameter; it +tells us that the sun is a cosmic hero who slays the black dragon of +night. So the mind of our body presents us with innumerable pictures and +symbols, exactly such as we find in poetry. There may be, and frequently +is, dispute as to just what a poet meant by this or that particular +image, but if we read all the work of any particular poet, we get a +certain impression of that poet's individuality. If he is always talking +about the perfume of women's hair and the gleam of the white flesh of +nymphs in the thickets, we are not left in doubt as to what is wrong +with this poet. + +And just so, when the expert sets to work to examine all the dreams that +any one person can remember, day after day, sooner or later the expert +observes that these dreams hover continually about one particular +subject; and by questioning the person, he can find out what is the +secret which is troubling the person, perhaps without the person himself +being aware of it. Of course there are many people who like nothing so +much as to talk about themselves; and many are spending their time and +their money on the latest fad of being "psyched," who would, in any +properly organized world, be put to work at hoeing weeds or washing +their own clothes. Nevertheless, it is a fact that there are real mental +disorders in the world, and innumerable honest and earnest people who +have something the matter with them which they do not understand. Here +is one way by which the conscientious investigator can find out what the +trouble is, and make it clear to them, and by establishing harmony +between their conscious and their subconscious minds, can many times put +them in the way of health and happiness. + +Through psychoanalysis we are enabled to understand the "split" +personality and its cause. We discover that almost everyone has more or +less rudimentary forms of multiple personality hidden within him; made +out of desires and traits which he does not like, or which the world +forces him to drive into the deeps of his being. These may be evil +impulses, of sex or violence; they may be the most noble altruisms, or +artistic yearnings, ridiculous things in a world of "hustle." A quite +normal man or woman may keep a separate self, apart from the world, +living a Jekyll life of business propriety and a Hyde life of religious +or musical ecstasy. Or again, the repressed impulses may integrate +themselves in the unconscious, and you may have genius or lunacy or +both--"great wits to madness near allied." The modern knowledge on such +dark mysteries you may find in Hart's "The Psychology of Insanity." + + + + +CHAPTER XIV + +THE PROBLEM OF IMMORTALITY + + (Discusses the survival of personality from the moral point of + view: that is, have we any claim upon life, entitling us to live + forever?) + + +As we explore the deeps of the subconsciousness, our own and other +people's, we find ourselves confronting the strange question: Is it all +our own mind, and that of other living people, or are we by any chance +dealing with the minds of those who are dead? A great many earnest +people, and some very learned people, are fully convinced that the +latter is the case, and we have now to consider their arguments. + +When I was a little boy I used to read and hear ghost stories, and would +shudder over them; but I was given to understand that all this was just +imagination, I must not take ghosts seriously, any more than fairies or +dragons or nymphs or satyrs. For an educated person to take ghosts +seriously--well, such a person would be almost as comical as that +supremely comical person, the flying-machine man. Would you believe it, +in those days there actually were people who believed they could learn +to fly in the air, and spent their time manufacturing machines for this +purpose! There was a scientist in Washington who had this "bug," and +built himself a machine and started to fly, and fell into the Potomac +river. We all laughed at him--we laughed so long and so loud that we +killed the poor man; and then, a few years later, somebody took that +machine of Professor Langley's and actually did fly with it! But that +was after I had grown up a bit more, and was not quite so ready to laugh +at an idea because it was new. + +I remember vividly my first meeting with a man who believed in ghosts. +He was a Unitarian clergyman, the Reverend Minot J. Savage of New York. +I was sixteen years old, and just breaking out of my theological shell, +and Doctor Savage helped to pry me loose. He was a grave and kindly man, +of great learning and intelligence, and I remember vividly my +consternation when one day he told me--oh, yes, he had seen many ghosts, +he was accustomed to talk with ghosts every now and then. There was no +doubt whatever that ghosts existed! + +He told me many stories. I remember one so well that I do not have to go +back to his books to look up the details. It was in the days before the +Atlantic cable, and he had a friend who took a steamer to England. One +night Doctor Savage was awakened and found the ghost of his friend +standing by his bedside. The ship had gone down off the Irish coast, so +the ghost declared, but the friend did not want Doctor Savage to think +that he had suffered from the pangs of drowning; he had been struck on +the left side of the head by a beam of the ship and had been killed +instantly. Doctor Savage wrote down these circumstances and had them +witnessed by a number of people, and two or three weeks later he +received word that the body of his friend had been found on the Irish +coast, with the left side of the head crushed in. + +So then, of course, I studied the subject of ghosts. I have studied it +off and on ever since, and have read most of the important new +discoveries and arguments of the psychic researchers. To begin with, I +will mention the contents of two large volumes, Gurney's "Phantasms of +the Living." In this book are narrated many hundreds of cases, of which +Doctor Savage's story is a type. It appears that persons at the moment +of death, or in times of great mental stress, do somehow have the power +to communicate with other people, even at the other side of the world. A +few such cases might be attributed to coincidence or to fraud, but when +you have so many cases, attested in minute detail by so many hundreds of +otherwise honest people, you are not being scientific but simply stupid +if you dismiss the whole subject with contempt. + +Gurney discusses the phenomenon and its probable causes. We know, of +course, that hallucinations are among the most common of psychic +phenomenon. Your subconscious mind can be caused to see and hear and +feel anything; likewise it has power to cause you to see and hear and +feel anything. In practically all cases of multiple personality some of +the split-off personalities can cause the others to see and hear and +feel. And the consciousness, you must understand, takes these things to +be just as real as real things; there is no way you can tell an +hallucination from reality--except to ask other people about it. And if +we admit the idea of telepathy, we may say that phantasms are +hallucinations caused by this means; that is, the subconscious mind of +your wife or your mother or your friend who is ill or dying, transmits +to your subconscious mind some vivid impression, which causes your own +subconscious mind to present to your consciousness a perfect image of +that person, walking and talking with you, and your consciousness has no +way of telling but that the image is real. + +So much for phantasms of the living. But are there any phantasms of the +dead? Are there any cases in which the time of the appearance can be +proven to be subsequent to the time of death? Even this would not prove +survival, of course; it is perfectly possible that the telepathic +impulse might be delayed in our own minds, it might not flash into +consciousness until our own state of mind made it possible. Can we say +that there are cases in which the facts communicated are such as to +convince us that the person was already dead, and was telling us +something as a dead person and not as a living one? + +Before we go into this question, let us clear the ground for the subject +by discussing the survival of personality from a more general +standpoint. What is it that we want to prove? What are the probabilities +of its being true? What would be the consequences of its not being true? +Have we any grounds, other than those of psychic research, for thinking +that it is true, or that it may be true, or that it ought to be true? +What, so to speak, are the morals of the doctrine of immortality? + +Well, to begin with, the survival of the soul after death and forever is +one of the principal doctrines of the Christian religion. Many devout +Christians will read this book, and I will seem to them blasphemous when +I say that this argument does not concern me. I count myself one of the +lovers and friends of Jesus, I am presumptuous enough to believe that if +he were on earth, I would understand him and get along with him +excellently; but I do not know any reason why I should believe this, +that, or the other doctrine about life because any religious sect, +founded upon the name of Jesus, commands me so to believe. I see no more +reason for adopting the idea of heaven because it is a Christian idea +than I see for adopting the idea of reincarnation because it is a +precious and holy idea to hundreds of millions of Buddhists. I have some +very good friends who are Theosophists, and are quite convinced of this +idea of reincarnation; that is, that the soul comes back into life over +and over again in many different bodies, thus completing itself and +renewing itself and expiating its sins. My Theosophist friends have a +most elaborate and complicated body of what they consider to be +knowledge on this subject; yet I have to take the liberty of saying that +I cannot see that it has any relation to reality. It seems to me as +completely unproven as any other fairy story, or myth, or legend--for +example, the seven infernos of Dante, and the elaborate and complicated +torments that are suffered there. + +But, it will be argued, Jesus rose from the dead, and thus proved the +immortality of the soul. Now, in the first place, there are many learned +investigators who consider there is insufficient evidence for believing +that Jesus ever lived; and certainly if this be so, it will be difficult +to prove that he rose from the dead. Again, it was a common occurrence +for crucified men not to die; sometimes it happened that their guards +allowed them to be spirited away--even nowadays we have known of prison +guards being bribed to allow a prisoner to escape. Again, the events of +the return of Jesus may have been just such psychic phenomena as we are +trying in this chapter to explain. Or, once more, they may have been +purely legends. A very brief study will convince a thinking person that +the people of that time were ready to believe anything, and to accept +facts upon such authority, and to make them the basis for a scientific +conclusion, is simply to be childish. + +I shall be told, of course, that it is in the Bible, and therefore it +must be true. The Bible is inspired, you say; and perhaps this is so. +But then, a great deal of other literature is inspired, and that does +not relieve me of the task of comparing these various inspirations, and +judging them, and picking out what is of use to me. The Bible is the +literature of the ancient Hebrews for a couple of thousand years. It +represents what the race mind of a great people for one generation after +another judged worth recording and preserving. You may get an idea what +this means, if you will picture to yourself a large volume of English +literature, containing some Teutonic myths, and the Saxon chronicles, +and the "Morte d'Arthur," and several of Chaucer's stories, and some +Irish fairy tales, and some of Bacon's essays, and Shakespeare's "Venus +and Adonis," and the English prayer book, and the architect's +specifications for Westminster Abbey, and a good part of "Burke's +Peerage"; also Blackstone's "Commentaries," a number of Wesley's hymns, +and Pope's "Essay on Man," and some chapters of Carlyle's "Past and +Present," and Gladstone's speeches, and Blake's poems, and Captain +Cook's story of his voyage around the world, and Southey's "Life of +Nelson," and Morris's "News from Nowhere," and Blatchford's "Merrie +England," and scores of pages from Hansard, which is the equivalent of +our Congressional Record. You may find this description irreverent, but +do not think it is meant so. Do me the honor to get out your Bible and +look it over from this point of view! + +But, you say, if we die altogether when we finish this earthly life, +what becomes of moral responsibility and the punishment of sins? What +shall we say to the wicked man to make him be good, if we cannot reward +him with a heaven and frighten him with a hell? Well, my first answer is +that we have been trying this process for a couple of thousand years, +and the results seem to indicate that we might better seek out some +other method of inducing men to behave themselves. They do not believe +so completely in heaven and hell these days, but there were times in +history when they did believe completely, and not merely were the +believers just as cruel, they were just as treacherous and just as +gluttonous and just as drunken. If you want to satisfy yourself on this +point, I refer you to my book "The Profits of Religion," page 129. + +Now, as a matter of fact, I think I can discern the outlines of a system +of rewards and punishments automatically working in the life of men. I +am not sure that I can prove that the wicked always get punished and the +virtuous always rewarded; yet, when I stop and think, I am sure that I +would not care to change places with any of the wicked people that I +know in this world. Life may not always be "getting" them, but it has a +way of "getting" their descendants, and I could not be entirely happy if +I knew that my son and his sons were going to share the fate which I now +observe befalling, for example, the grand dukes of Russia and their +children. Life is one thing, and it does not exist for the individual, +but for the race; its causes and effects do not always manifest +themselves in one individual, but in a line of descendants. "Why are +they called dynasties?" asked one of my professors of history; and a +student brought the session to an end by answering: "Because that is +what they always seem to do!" + +But this is not perfect justice, you will argue. It is not perfect, from +the point of view of you or me; but then, I ask, what else is there in +the world that is perfect from that point of view? Why should our +justice be any more perfect than, for example, our health or our +thinking or our climate or our government? And, may it not very well be +that our justice is up to us, in precisely the same way that some of +these other things are up to us? Maybe what we have to do is to set to +work to see to it that virtue does always get rewarded and vice does +always get punished, right here and now, instead of waiting for an +omnipotent God to attend to it in some hypothetical heaven. + +I find this life of mine very wonderful, and enormously interesting. I +am willing to take it on the terms that it is given, and to try to make +the best of it; and I do not see that I have any right to dictate what +shall be given me in some future life. If my father gives me a Christmas +present, I am happy and grateful; and, of course, if I know that he is +going to give me another present next Christmas, I am still more happy; +but I do not see that I have any right to argue that because he gives me +one Christmas present, he must give me an unlimited number of them, and +I think it would be very ungrateful of me to refuse to thank him for a +Christmas present until I had made sure that I was to get one next time! + +Neither do I find myself such a wonderful person that I can assert that +the morality of the universe absolutely depends upon the fact that I am +immortal. Of course, I should like to live forever, and to know all the +wonderful things that are going to happen in the world, and if it is +true that I am so to live, I shall be immensely delighted. But I cannot +say that it _must_ be true, and all I can do is to investigate the +probabilities. On this point my view is stated in a sentence of +Spinoza's: "He who would love God rightly must not desire that God love +him in return." + +To sum up, the question of immortality is purely a question of fact. It +is one to be approached in a spirit of open-minded inquiry, entirely +unaffected by hopes or fears or dogmas or moral claims. It is worth +while to get clear that we may be immortal, even though we do not now +know it and cannot now prove it; it is possible that all psychic +research might end in telepathy, and still, when we die, we might wake +up and find ourselves alive. It might possibly be that some of us are +immortal and not all of us. It might be that some parts of us are +immortal and not the rest. It might be that our subconsciousness is +immortal and not our consciousness. It might be that all of us, or some +part of us, survive for a time, but not forever. This last is something +which I myself am inclined to think may be the case. + +Also, it seems worthwhile to mention that it is no argument against +immortality that we cannot imagine it, that we cannot picture a universe +consisting of uncountable billions of living souls, or what these souls +would do to pass the time. It may very well be that among these souls +there is no such thing as time. It may be that they are thoroughly +occupied in ways beyond our imagining, or again, that they are not +occupied, and under no necessity of being occupied. Let the person who +presents such arguments begin by picturing to you how the brain cells +manage to store up the uncounted millions of memories which you have, +the thousands of words and combinations of words, and the thoughts which +go with them, musical notes and tunes, colors and odors and visual +impressions, memories of the past and hopes of the future and dreams +that never were. Where are all those hundreds of millions of things, and +what are they like when they are not in our consciousness, and how do +they pass the time, and where were they in the hundreds of millions of +years before we were born, and where will they be in the hundreds of +millions of years of the future? When our wise men can answer these +questions completely, it will be time enough for them to tell us about +the impossibility of immortality. + + + + +CHAPTER XV + +THE EVIDENCE FOR SURVIVAL + + (Discusses the data of psychic research, and the proofs of + spiritism thus put before us.) + + +Let us now take up the question of survival of personality after death +from the strictly scientific point of view; let us consider what facts +we have, and the indications they seem to give. First, we know that to +all appearances the consciousness and the subconsciousness are bound up +with the body. They grow with the body, they decline with the body, they +seem to die with the body. We can irretrievably damage the consciousness +by drawing a whiff of cyanogen gas into the lungs, or by sticking a pin +into the brain, or by clogging one of its tiny blood vessels with waste +matter. It is terrible to us to think that the mind of a great poet or +prophet or statesman may be snuffed out of existence in such a way; but +then, it is no argument against a fact to say that it is terrible. +Insanity is terrible, war is terrible, pestilence is terrible, so also +are tigers and poisonous snakes; but all these things exist, and all +these things have power over the wisest and greatest mind, to put an end +to its work on this earth at least. + +And now we come with the new instrument of psychic research, to probe +the question: What becomes of this consciousness when it disappears? Can +we prove that it is still in existence, and is able by any method to +communicate with us? Those who answer "Yes" argue that the mind of the +dead person, unable to use its own bodily machinery any longer, manages +in the hypnotic trance to use the bodily machinery of another person, +called a "medium," and by it to make some kind of record to identify +itself. + +This, of course, is a strange idea, and requires a good deal of proof. +The law of probability requires us not to accept an unlikely +explanation, if there is any more simple one which can account for the +facts. When we examine the product of automatic writing, table-tipping, +and other psychic phenomena, we have first to ask ourselves, Is there +anything in all this which cannot be explained by what we already know? +Then, second, we have to ask, Is there any other supposition which will +explain the facts, and which is easier to believe than the spirit +theory? + +These "spirits" apparently desire to convince us of their reality, and +they tell us many things which are expected to convince us; they tell us +things which we ourselves do not know, and which spirits might know. But +here again we run up against the problem of the subconsciousness, with +its infinite mass of "forgotten" knowledge. It is not so easy for the +"spirits" to tell us things which we can be sure our subconscious mind +could not possibly contain. Also, there comes the additional element of +telepathy. It appears to be a fact that under trance conditions, or +under any especially exciting conditions of the consciousness, one mind +can reach out and take something out of another mind, or one mind can +cause something to be passed over to another mind; and so information +can be communicated to the mind of a medium, and can appear in automatic +writing, or in clairvoyance, or in crystal gazing. + +One of the most conscientious and earnest of all the investigators of +this subject was the late Professor Hyslop, who many years ago sought to +teach me "practical morality" (from the bourgeois point of view) in +Columbia University. Professor Hyslop worked for fifteen years with a +medium by the name of Mrs. Piper, who was apparently sincere and was +never exposed in any kind of fraud. In Professor Hyslop's books you will +find innumerable instances of amazing facts brought out in Mrs. Piper's +trances. You will find Professor Hyslop arguing that the only way +telepathy can account for these facts is by the supposition that there +is a universal subconscious mind, or that the subconscious mind of the +medium possesses the power to reach into the subconscious mind of every +other living person and take out anything from it. But for my part, I +cannot see that the case is quite so difficult. Professor Hyslop +recites, for example, how Mrs. Piper would tell him facts about some +long dead relative--facts which he did not know, but was later able to +verify. But that proves simply nothing at all, because there could be no +possible way for Professor Hyslop to be sure that he had never known +these facts about his relatives. The facts might have been in his +subconscious mind without having ever been in his conscious mind at all; +he might have heard people talking about these matters while he was +reading a book, or playing as a boy, paying no attention to what was +said. + +And then came Sir Oliver Lodge with his investigations. I will say this +for his work--he was the first person who was able to make real to my +mind the startling idea that perhaps after all the dead might be alive +and able to communicate with us. You will find what he has to say in his +book, "The Survival of Man," and it seems fair that a great scientist +and a great man should have a chance to convince you of what seem to him +the most important facts in the world. + +Sir Oliver's son Raymond was killed in the war, and it is claimed that +he began at once to communicate with his family. Among other things, he +told them of the existence of a picture, which none of them had ever +seen or heard of, a group photograph which he described in detail. But, +of course, other people in this group knew of the existence of the +photograph, and so we have again the possibility that some member of Sir +Oliver's family may have taken into his subconscious mind without +knowing it an impression or description of that picture. If you care to +experiment, you will find that you can frequently play a part in the +dreams of a child by talking to it in its sleep; and that is only one of +a thousand different ways by which some member of a family might +acquire, without knowing it, information of the existence of a +photograph. + +There is another possibility to be considered--that a portion of the +consciousness may survive, and not necessarily forever. We are +accustomed when death takes place to see the body before us, and we know +that we can preserve the body for thousands of years if we wish. Why is +it not possible that when conscious life is brought to a sudden end, +there may remain some portion of the consciousness, or of the +subconsciousness, cut off from the body, and slowly fading back into the +universal mind energy, whatever we please to call it? There is a hard +part of the body, the skeleton, which survives for some time; why might +there not be a central core of the mind which is similarly tough and +enduring? Of course, if consciousness is a function of the brain, it +must decay as the brain decays; but how would it be if the brain were a +function of the consciousness--which is, so far as I can see, quite as +likely a guess. + +I find many facts which seem to indicate the plausibility of this idea. +I notice that in trance phenomena it is the spirits of those recently +dead which seem to manifest the most vitality. Of course, you can go to +any seance in the "white light" district of your city and receive +communications from the souls of Cæsar and Napoleon and Alexander the +Great and Pocahontas, and if the medium does not happen to be literary, +you can communicate with Hamlet and Don Quixote and Siegfried and +Achilles; but you will not find much reality about any of these people, +they will not tell you very much about the everyday details of their +lives. This fact that so much of what the "spirits" tell us is of our +own time tends to cast doubt on the idea that the dead survive forever. +How simple it would be to convince us, if the spirit of Sophocles would +come back to earth and tell us where to dig in order to find copies of +his lost tragedies! You would think that the soul of Sophocles, seeing +our great need of beauty and wisdom, would be interested to give us his +works! From genius, operating under the guidance of the conscious mind, +we get sublimity, majesty and power; but what the trance mediums give us +suggests, both in its moral and intellectual quality, the operation of +the subconscious. It is exactly like what we get, for example, from +dissociated personalities. + +There are, to be sure, the books of Patience Worth, produced by the +automatic writing of a lady in St. Louis, who tells us in evident good +faith that her conscious personality is entirely innocent of Patience, +and all her thought and doings. Patience writes long novels and dramas +in a quaint kind of old English, and the lady in St. Louis knows nothing +about this language. But does she positively know that when she was a +child, she never happened to be in the room with someone who was reading +old English aloud? Nothing seems more likely than that her subconscious +mind heard some quaint, strange language, and took possession of it, and +built up a personality around it, and even made a new language and a new +literature from that starting point. + +That is precisely the kind of thing in which the subconscious revels. It +creates new characters, with an imagination infinite and inexhaustible. +Who has not waked up and been astounded at the variety and reality of a +dream? Who has not told his dreams and laughed over them? The +subconscious will play at games, it will act and rehearse elaborate +rôles; it will put on costumes, and delight in being Cæsar and Napoleon +and Alexander the Great and Pocahontas and Hamlet and Don Quixote and +Siegfried and Achilles. Yes, it will even play at being "spirits"! It +will be mischievous and impish; it will be swallowed up with a sense of +its own importance, taking an insolent delight in convincing the world's +most learned scientists of the fact that its play-acting is reality. It +will call itself "Raymond" to move and thrill a grief-stricken family; +it will call itself "Phinuit" and "Dr. Hodgson," and cause an earnest +professor of "practical morality" to give up a respectable position in +Columbia University and write books to convince the world that the dead +are sending him messages. + +Consider, for example, the multiple personality of Miss Beauchamp. +Remember that here we are not dealing with any guess work about +"spirits"; here we have half a dozen different "controls," none of them +the least bit dead, but all of them a part of the consciousness of one +entirely alive young lady. A specialist has spent some six years +investigating the case, day after day, week after week, writing down the +minute details of what happens. And now consider the miscreant known as +"Sally." Sally is just as real as any child whom you ever held in your +arms. Sally has love and hate, fear and hope, pain and delight--and +Sally is a little demon, created entirely out of the subconsciousness of +a highly refined and conscientious young college graduate of Boston. +Sally spends Miss Beauchamp's money on candy, and eats it; Sally pawns +Miss Beauchamp's watch and deliberately loses the ticket; Sally uses +Miss Beauchamp's lips and tongue to tell lies about Miss Beauchamp; +Sally strikes Miss Beauchamp dumb, or makes her hear exactly the +opposite of what is spoken to her. Yes, and Sally pleads and fights +frantically for her life; Sally enters into intrigues with other parts +of Miss Beauchamp, and for years deliberately fools Doctor Prince, who +is her Recording Angel and Heavenly Judge! + +And can anybody doubt that Sally could have fooled a grieving mother, +and made that mother think she was talking to the ghost of a long lost +child? Can anybody doubt that Sally could and would play the part of any +person she had ever known, or of any historic character she had ever +read about? And don't overlook the all-important fact that the conscious +Miss Beauchamp was absolutely innocent of all this, and was horrified +when she was told about it. So here you have the following situation, no +matter of guesswork, but definitely established: your dearest friend may +act as a medium, and in all good faith may bring to the surface some +part of his or her subconsciousness, which masquerades before you in a +hundred different rôles, and plays upon you with deliberate malice the +most subtle and elaborate and cruel tricks. + +And how much worse the situation becomes when to this there is added the +possibility of conscious fraud! When the medium is a person who is +taking your money, and thrives by making you believe in the "spirits" +she produces! You may go to Lily Dale, in New York state, the home of +the Spiritualists, where they have a convention every summer, and in row +after row of tents you may hear, and even see, every kind of spirit you +ever dreamed of, ringing bells and shaking tambourines and dancing jigs. +And you may see poor farmers' wives, with tears streaming down their +cheeks, listening to the endearments of their dead children, and to +wisdom from the lips of Oliver Wendell Holmes speaking with a Bowery +accent. This kind of thing was exposed many years ago by Will Irwin in a +book called "The Medium Game"; and then--after traveling from one kind +of medium to another, and studying all their frauds, Irwin tells how he +went into a "parlor" on Sixth Avenue, and there by a fat old woman who +had never seen him before, was suddenly told the most intimate secrets +of his life! + +It has recently been announced that Thomas A. Edison is at work upon a +device to enable spirits to communicate with the living, if there really +are spirits seeking to do this. It is Edison's idea that spirits may +inhabit some kind of infinitely rarefied astral body, and he proposes to +manufacture an instrument which is sensitive to an impression many +millions of times fainter than anything the human body can feel. This +should make it easier for the spirits, and should constitute a fairer +test, possibly a decisive one. When that machine is perfected and put to +work by scientific men, I wish to suggest a few tests which will +convince me that there really are spirits, and that the results are not +to be explained by telepathy. + +First, assuming that the spirits live forever, there are some useful +things which were known to the people of ancient time, and are not known +to anyone living now. For example, let one of the Egyptian craftsmen +come forward and tell us the secret of their glass-staining, which I +understand is now a lost art. And then Sophocles, as I have already +suggested, will tell us where we can find his lost dramas; or if he +doesn't know where any copies are buried, let him find in the spirit +world some scribe or librarian or book-lover who can give us this +priceless information. All over the ancient lands are buried and +forgotten cities, and in those cities are papyrus scrolls and graven +tablets and bricks. Infinite stores of knowledge are thus concealed from +us; and how simple for the ancient ones who possess this information to +make it known to us, and so to convince us of their reality! + +Or, again, supposing that spirits are not immortal, but that they slowly +fade from life as do their bodies. Suppose that a Raymond Lodge or other +recently dead soldier wishes to communicate with his father and to +convince his father that it is really an independent being, and not +simply a part of the father's subconscious mind--let him try something +like this. Let the father write six brief notes, and put them in six +envelopes all alike, and shuffle them up and put them in a hat and draw +out one of them. Now, assuming that the experimenter is honest, there is +no living human being who knows the contents of that envelope, and if +the medium is dipping into the subconscious mind of the experimenter, +the chances are one in six of the right note being hit upon. Assuming +that spirits may not be able to get inside an envelope and read a folded +letter, there is no objection to the experimenter, provided he is +honest, and provided there are no mirrors or other tricks, holding the +envelope behind his back, and tearing it open, and spreading it out for +the convenience of the spirit. And now, if the spirit can read that +letter correctly every time, we shall be fairly certain that whatever +force we are dealing with, it is not the subconscious mind of the +experimenter. + +Or, let us take another test. Let us have a roulette wheel in a covered +box, or hidden away so that no one but the spirit can see it. We spin +the wheel, and any one of the habitues of Monte Carlo can figure out the +chance of the little ball dropping into any particular number. If now +the spirit can tell us each time where we shall find the ball, we shall +know that we are dealing with knowledge which does not exist either in +the conscious or the subconscious mind of any living human being. + +Among the things that "spirits" have been accustomed to do, since the +days when they first made their appearance with the Fox sisters in +America, are the lifting of tables and the ringing of bells and the +assuming of visible forms. These are what is known as +"materializations," and when I was a boy, and used to hear people +talking about these things, there was always one test required: let the +materializations manifest themselves upon recording instruments +scientifically devised; let photographs be taken of them, let them be +weighed and measured, and so on. Well, time has moved forward, and these +tests have been met, and it appears that "materializations" are +facts--although it is still as uncertain as ever what they are +materializations of. An English scientist, Professor Crawford, has +published a book entitled "The Reality of Psychic Phenomena," in which +he tells the results of many years of testing materializations by the +strictest scientific methods. When the medium "levitates" a table--that +is, causes it to go up in the air without physical contact--it appears +that her own weight increases by exactly the weight of the table. When +she exerts any force, which apparently she can do at a distance, the +recording instruments show the exact counter-force in her own body. + +The results of these investigations are calculated at first to take your +breath away. It begins to appear that the theosophists may be right, and +that we may have one or more "astral" bodies within or coincident with +the physical body; and that under the trance conditions we mold and make +over this "astral" body in accordance with our imaginations, precisely +as a sculptor molds the clay. At any rate, our subconsciousness has the +power to project from it masses of substance, and to cause these to take +all kinds of forms, for example, human faces, which have been +photographed innumerable times. Or the body can shoot out long rods or +snaky projections, which lift tables, and exert force which has been +recorded upon pressure instruments and weighed by scales. + +As I write, a friend lends me a fifteen-dollar volume, a translation +just published of an elaborate work by Baron von Schrenck-Notzing, a +physician of Munich, giving minute details of four years' experiments in +this field. So rigid was this investigator in his efforts to exclude +fraud, that not merely was the medium stripped and sewed up in black +tights, but the "cabinet" in which she sat was a big sack of black +cloth, everywhere sewed tight by machine. Every crevice of the medium's +body was searched before and after the tests, and every inch of the +"cabinet" gone over. The investigators sat within a couple of feet of +the medium, and would draw back the curtains, and while holding her +hands and her feet, would watch great masses of filmy gray and white +stuff exude from the medium's mouth, from her armpits and breasts and +sides. This would happen in red light of a hundred candle power, by +which print could be easily read; and the medium would herself +illuminate the phenomena with a red electric torch. The investigators +would be privileged to examine these "phantom" forms, to touch them +gently, and be touched by them--soft and slimy, like the tongue of an +animal; but sometimes the things would misbehave, and strike them in the +eye, hurting them. + +The medium, a young French girl living in the home of the wife of a +well-known French playwright, had begun with spiritualist ideas, but +came to take a matter-of-fact attitude to what happened, and in her +trances would labor to mold these emanations into hands or faces, as +requested by those present. She finally succeeded in allowing them to +separate the soft mucous stuff from her body, and keep it for chemical +and bacteriological examination. All this time she would be surrounded +by a battery of cameras, nine at once, some of them inside the cabinet; +and when the desired emanation was in sight, all these cameras would be +set off by flashlight, and in the book you have over two hundred such +photographs, showing faces and hands from every point of view. There are +even moving-pictures, showing the material coming out of her mouth and +going back! + +It is evident that we have here a whole universe of unexplored +phenomena; and it seems that many of the old-time superstitions which +were dumped overboard have now to be dragged back into the boat and +examined in the light of new knowledge. What could smack more of magic +and fraud than crystal-gazing? Yet it appears that the subconsciousness +has power to project an image of its hidden memories into a crystal +ball, where it may be plainly seen. We find so well-recognized an +authority as Dr. Morton Prince using this method to enable one of the +many Miss Beauchamps to recall incidents in her previous life which were +otherwise entirely lost to her. Likewise this exploration of the +disintegration of personality enables us to watch in the making all the +phenomena of trance and ecstasy which have had so much to do with the +making of religions. We know now how Joan of Arc heard the "voices," and +we can make her hear more voices or make her stop hearing voices, as we +prefer. Also we know all about demons and "demoniac possession." We can +cast out demons--and without having to cause them to enter a herd of +swine! We may some day be prepared to investigate the wonder stories +which the Yogis tell us, about their ability to leave their physical +bodies in a trance, and to appear in England at a few moments' notice +for the transaction of their spiritual business! + +But we want things proven to us, and we don't want the people with whom +we work to be animated either by religious fanaticism or by money greed. +We are ready to unlimber our minds, and prepare for long journeys into +strange regions, but we want to move cautiously, and choose our route +carefully, and be sure we do not lose our way! We want to deal +rationally with life; we don't want to make wild guesses, or to choose a +complicated and unlikely solution when a simple one will suffice. But, +on the other hand, we must be alive to the danger of settling down on +our little pile of knowledge, and refusing to take the trouble to +investigate any more. That is a habit of learned men, I am sorry to say; +the law of inertia applies to the scientist, as well as to the objects +he studies. The scientists of our time have had to be prodded into +considering each new discovery about the subconscious mind, precisely as +the scientists of Galileo's time had to be prodded to watch him drop +weights from the tower of Pisa. When he told them that the earth moved +round the sun instead of the sun round the earth, they tortured him in a +dungeon to make him take it back, and he did so, but whispered to +himself, "And yet it moves." And it did move, of course, and continued +to move. And in exactly the same way, if it be true that we have these +hidden forces in us, they will continue to manifest themselves, and +masses of people will continue to flock to Lily Dale, and to pay out +their hard-earned money, until such a time as our learned men set to +work to find out the facts and tell us how we can utilize these forces +without the aid of either superstition or charlatanry. + + + + +CHAPTER XVI + +THE POWERS OF THE MIND + + (Sets forth the fact that knowledge is freedom and ignorance is + slavery, and what science means to the people.) + + +We have now completed a brief survey of the mind and its powers. +Whatever we may have proved or failed to prove, this much we may say +with assurance: the reader who has followed our brief sketch attentively +has been disabused of any idea he may have held that he knows it all; +and this is always the first step towards knowledge. + +The mind is the instrument whereby our race has lifted itself out of +beasthood. It is the instrument whereby we hold ourselves above the +forces which seek to drag us down, and whereby we shall lift ourselves +higher, if higher we are to go. How shall we protect this precious +instrument? How shall we complete our mastery of it? What are the laws +of the conduct of the mind? + +The process of the mind is one of groping outward after new facts, and +digesting and assimilating them, as the body gropes after and digests +and assimilates food. The senses bring us new impressions, and we take +these and analyze them, tear them into the parts which compose them, +compare them with previous sensations, recognize difference in things +which seem to be alike, and resemblances in things which seem to be +different; we classify them, and provide them with names, which are, as +it were, handles for the mind to grasp. Above all, we seek for causes; +those chains of events which make what we know as order in the world of +phenomena. And when the mind has what seems to be a cause, it proceeds +to test it according to methods it has worked out, the rules and +principles of experimental science. + +It is a comparatively small number of sensations which the body brings +to the mind of itself; it is a narrow world in which we should live if +our minds adopted a passive attitude toward life. But some minds possess +what we call curiosity; they set out upon their own impulse to explore +life; they discover new laws and make new experiences and new +sensations for themselves. The mind forms an idea, and at first, after +the fashion of the ancient Greek philosophers, it glorifies that idea +and sets it in the seat of divinity. But presently comes the empirical +method, which refuses authority to any idea unless it can stand the test +of experiment, and prove that it corresponds with reality. Nowadays the +thinker amasses his facts, and forms a theory to explain them, and then +proceeds to try out this theory by the most rigid method that he or his +critics can devise. If the theory doesn't "work"--that is, if it doesn't +explain all the facts and stand all the tests--it is thrown away like a +worn-out shoe. So little by little a body of knowledge is built up which +is real knowledge; which will serve us in our daily lives, which we can +use as foundation-stones in the structure of our civilization. + +By this method of research man is expanding his universe beyond anything +that could have been conceived in the pre-scientific days. Hour by hour, +while we work and play and sleep, the mind of our race is discovering +new worlds in which our posterity will dwell. For uncounted ages man +walked upon the earth, surrounded by infinite swarms of bacterial life +of whose existence he never dreamed. The invisible rays of the spectrum +beat upon him, and he knew nothing of what they did to him, whether good +or evil. He lifted his head and saw vast universes of suns, in +comparison with which his world was a mere speck of dust; yet to him +these universes were globes or lanterns which some divinity had hung in +the sky. + +One of the most fascinating illustrations of how the mind runs ahead of +the senses is the story of the planet Uranus, which, less than two +hundred years ago, had never been beheld by the eye of man. A +mathematician seated in his study, working over the observations of +other planets, their motions in relation to their mass and distance, +discovered that their behavior was not as it should be. At certain times +none of them were in quite the right place, and he decided that this +variation must be due to the existence of an unknown body. He worked out +the problem of what must be the mass and the exact orbit of this body, +in order for it to be responsible for the variations observed; and when +he had completed these calculations, he announced to the astronomical +world, "Turn your telescopes to a certain spot in the heavens at a +certain minute of a certain night, and you will find a new planet of a +certain size." And so for the first time the human senses became aware +of a fact, which by themselves they might not have discovered in all +eternity. + +Now, the importance of exact knowledge concerning a new planet may not +be apparent to the ordinary man; but if the thing which is discovered +is, for example, an unknown ray which will move an engine or destroy a +cancer, then we realize the worthwhileness of research, and the masters +of the world's commerce are willing to give here and there a pittance +for the increase of such knowledge. But men of science, who have by this +time come to a sense of their own dignity and importance, understand +that there is no knowledge about reality which is useless, no research +into nature which is wasted. You might say that to describe and classify +the fleas which inhabit the bodies of rats and ground-squirrels, and to +study under the microscope the bacteria which live in the blood of these +fleas--that this would be an occupation hardly worthy of the divinity +that is in man. But presently, as a result of this knowledge about fleas +and flea diseases being in existence and available, a bacteriologist +discovers the secret of the dread bubonic plague, which hundreds of +times in past history has wiped out a great part of the population of +Europe and Asia. + +Mark Twain tells in his "Connecticut Yankee" how his hero was able to +overcome the wizard Merlin, because he knew in advance of an eclipse of +the sun. And this was fiction, of course; but if you prefer fact, you +may read in the memoirs of Houdin, the French conjurer, how he was able +to bring the Arab tribes into subjection to the French government by +depriving the great chieftains of their strength. He gathered them into +a theatre, and invited their mighty men upon the stage, and there was an +iron weight, and they were able to lift it when Houdin permitted, and +not to lift it when he forbade. These noble barbarians had never heard +of the electro-magnet, and could not conceive of a force that could +operate through a solid wooden floor beneath their feet. + +Such things, trivial as they are, serve to illustrate the difference +between ignorance and knowledge, and the power which knowledge gives. +The man who knows is godlike to those who do not know; he may enslave +them, he may do what he pleases with their lives, and they are powerless +to help themselves. Anyone who would help them must begin by giving them +knowledge, real knowledge. There is no such thing as freedom without +knowledge, and it must be the best knowledge, it must be new knowledge; +he who goes against new knowledge armed with old knowledge is like the +Chinese who went out to meet machine-guns with bows and arrows, and with +umbrellas over their heads. + +Once upon a time knowledge was the prerogative of kings and priests and +ruling castes; but this supreme power has been wrested from them, and +this is the greatest step in human progress so far taken. "Seek and ye +shall find," is the law concerning knowledge today. "Knock, and it shall +be opened unto you." In this, my Book of the Mind, I say to you that +knowledge is your priceless birthright, and that you should repudiate +all men and all institutions and all creeds and all formulas which seek +to keep this heritage from you. Beware of men who bid you believe +something because it is told you, or because your fathers believed it, +or because it is written in some ancient book, or embodied in some +ancient ceremonial. Break the chains of these venerable spells; and at +the same time beware of the modern spells which have been contrived to +replace them! Beware of party cries and shibboleths, the idols of the +forum, as Plato called them, the prejudices which are set as snares for +your feet. Beware of cant--that paraphernalia of noble sentiments, +artificially manufactured by politicians and newspapers for the purpose +of blinding you to their knaveries. Remember that you live in a world of +class conflicts; at every moment of your life your mind is besieged by +secret enemies, it is exposed to poison gas-clouds deliberately released +by people who seek to make use of you for purposes which are theirs and +not yours. In the fairy-tales we used to love, the hero was provided +with magic protection against the perils of those times; but what hero +and what magic will guard the modern man against the propaganda of +militarism, nationalism, and capitalist imperialism? + +The mind is like the body in that it can be trained, it can be taught +sound habits, its powers can be enormously increased. There are many +books on mind and memory training, some of which are useful, and some of +which are trash. There is an English system widely advertised, called +"Pelmanism," of which I have personally made no test, but it has won +endorsements of a great many people who do not give their endorsements +lightly. + +This is the subject of applied psychology, and just as in medicine, or +in law, or in any of the arts, there is a vast amount of charlatanry, +but there is also genuine knowledge being patiently accumulated and +standardized. When the United States government had to have an army in a +hurry it did not make its millions of young men into teamsters or +aviators at random. It used the new methods of determining reaction +times, and testing the coordination of mind and body. Recently I visited +the Whittier Reform School in California, where delinquent boys are +educated by the state. A boy had been set to work in the tailor shop, +and it had been found that he was unable to make the buttons and the +buttonholes of a coat come in the right place. For nine years the state +of California, and before it the state of Georgia, had been laboring to +teach this boy to make buttons and buttonholes meet; the effort had cost +some five thousand dollars, to say nothing of all the coats which were +spoiled, and all the mental suffering of the victim and his teachers. +Finally someone persuaded the state of California to spend a few +thousand dollars and install a psychological bureau for the purpose of +testing all the inmates of the institution; so by a half hour's +examination the fact was developed that this boy was mentally defective. +Although he was eighteen years old in body, his mind was only eight +years old, and so he would never be able to achieve the feat of making +buttons and buttonholes meet. + +This is a new science which you may read about in Terman's "The +Measurement of Intelligence." By testing normal children, it is +established that certain tasks can be performed at certain ages. A child +of three can point to his eyes, his nose and his mouth; he can repeat a +sentence of six syllables, and repeat two digits, and give his family +name. Older children are asked to look at a picture and then tell what +they saw; to note omissions in a picture, to arrange blocks according to +their weight, to arrange words into sentences, to note absurdities in +statements, to count backwards, and to make change. Children of fifteen +are asked to interpret fables, to reverse the hands of a clock, and so +on. Of course there are always variations; every child will be better at +some kinds of tests than at others. But by having a wide variety, and +taking the average, you establish a "mental age" for the child--which +may be widely different from its physical age. You may find some whose +minds have stopped growing altogether, and can only be made to grow by +special methods of education. Enlightened communities are now conducting +separate schools for defective children--replacing the old-fashioned +schoolmaster who wore out birch-rods trying to force poor little +wretches to learn what was beyond their power. + +In the same way psychology can be applied in industry, and in the +detection of crime. Here, too, there is a vast amount of "fake," but +also the beginning of a science. Our laws do not as yet permit the use +of automatic writing and the hypnotic trance in the investigation of +crime, but they have sometimes permitted some of the simpler tests, for +example, those of memory association. The examiner prepares a list of a +hundred names of objects, and reads those names one after another, and +asks the person he is investigating to name the first thing which is +suggested to him by each word in turn. "Engine" will suggest "steam," or +perhaps it will suggest "train"; "coat" will suggest "trousers," or +perhaps it will suggest "pocket," and so on. The examiner holds a +stop-watch, and notes what fraction of a second each one of these +reactions takes. The ordinary man, who is not trying to conceal +anything, will give all his associations promptly, and the reaction +times will be approximately alike. But suppose the man has just murdered +somebody with an axe, and buried the body in a cellar with a fire +shovel, and taken a pocketbook, and a watch, and a locket, and a number +of various objects, and climbed out of the cellar window by breaking the +glass; and now suppose that in his list of a hundred objects the +psychologist introduces unexpectedly a number of these things. In each +case the first memory association of the criminal will be one which he +does not wish to give. He will have to find another, and that inevitably +takes time. One or two such delays might be accidental; but if every +time there is any suggestion of the murder, or the method or scene of +the murder, there is noticed confusion and delay, you may be sure that +the conscious mind is interfering with the subconscious mind. The +difference between the conscious and the subconscious mind is always +possible to detect, and if you are permitted to be thorough in your +experiments, you can make certain what is in the subconscious mind that +the conscious mind is trying to conceal. + +Here, as everywhere in life, knowledge is power, and expert knowledge +confers mastery over the shrewdest untrained mind. The only trouble is +that under our present social system the trained mind is very apt to be +working in the interest of class privilege. The psychologist who is +employed by a great corporation, or by a police department, may be as +little worthy of trust as a chemist who is engaged in making poison +gases to be used by capitalist imperialism for the extermination of its +rebellious slaves. But what this proves is not that scientific knowledge +is untrustworthy, but merely that the workers must acquire it, they must +have their own organizations and their own experiments in every field. +To give knowledge to the masses of mankind, slow and painful as the +process seems, is now the most important task confronting the +enlightened thinker. + +The method of psychoanalysis gives us also much insight into the +phenomena of genius, and the hope that we may ultimately come to +understand it. At present we are embarrassed because genius is so often +closely allied to eccentricity; the supernormal appears in connection +with the subnormal--and it is often hard to tell them apart. Great poets +and painters in revolt against a world of smug commercialism, adopt +irresponsibility as their religion; they live in a world of their own, +they dress like freaks, they refuse to pay their debts, or to be true to +their wives. They are followed by a host of disciples, who adopt the +defects of the master as a substitute for his qualities. And so there +grows up a perverted notion of what genius is, and wholly false +standards of artistic quality. There is nothing mankind needs more than +sure and exact tests of mental superiority; not merely the ability to +acquire languages and to solve mathematical equations, but the ability +to carry in the mind intense emotions, while at the same time shaping +and organizing them by the logical faculty, selecting masses of facts +and weaving them into a pattern calculated to awaken the emotion in +others. This is the last and greatest work of the human spirit, and to +select the men who can do it, and foster their activity, is the ultimate +purpose of all true science. + + + + +CHAPTER XVII + +THE CONDUCT OF THE MIND + + (Concludes the Book of the Mind with a study of how to preserve and + develop its powers for the protection of our lives and the lives of + all men.) + + +Someone wrote me the other day, asking, "When is the best time to +acquire knowledge?" I answer, "The time is now." It is easier to learn +things when you are young, but you cannot be young when you want to be, +and if you are old, the best time to acquire knowledge is when you are +old. It is true that the brain-cells seem to harden like the body, and +it is less easy for them to take on new impressions; but it can be done, +and just as Seneca began to learn Greek at eighty, I know several old +men whom the recent war has shaken out of their grooves of thought and +compelled to deal with modern ideas. + +But if you are young, then so much the better! Then the divine thrill of +curiosity is keenest; then your memory is fresh, and can be trained; +your mind is plastic, and you can form sound habits. You can teach +yourself to respect truth and to seek it, you can teach yourself +accuracy, open-mindedness, flexibility, persistence in the search for +understanding. + +First of all, I think, is accuracy. Learn to think straight! Let your +mind be as a sharp scalpel, penetrating unrealities and falsehoods, +cutting its way to the facts. When you set out to deal with a certain +subject, acquire mastery of it, so that you can say, "I know." And yet, +never be too sure that you know! Never be so sure, that you are not +willing to consider new facts, and to change your way of thinking if it +should be necessary. I look about me at the world, and see tigers and +serpents, dynamite and poison gas and forty-two centimeter shells--yet I +see nothing in the world so deadly to men as an error of the mind. Look +at the mental follies about you! Look at the prejudices, the delusions, +the lies deliberately maintained--and realize the waste of it all, the +pity of it all! + +Every man, it seems, has his pet delusions, which he hugs to his bosom +and loves because they are his own. If you try to deprive him of those +delusions, it is as though you tore from a woman's arms the child she +has borne. I have written a book called "The Profits of Religion," and +never a week passes that there do not come to me letters from people who +tell me they have read this book with pleasure and profit, they are +grateful to me for teaching them so much about the follies and delusions +of mankind, and it is all right and all true, save for two or three +pages, in which I deal with the special hobby which happens to be their +hobby! What I say about all the other creeds is correct--but I fail to +understand that the Mormon religion is a dignified and inspired +religion, a gift from on high, and if only I would carefully study the +"Book of Mormon," I would realize my error! Or it is all right, except +what I say about the Christian Scientists, or the Theosophists, or +perhaps one particular sect of the Theosophists, who are different from +the others. Today there lies upon my desk a letter from a man who has +read many of my books, and now is grief-stricken because he must part +company from me; he discovers that I permit myself to speak +disrespectfully about the Seventh Day Adventist religion, whereas he is +prepared to show the marvels of biblical prophecy now achieving +themselves in the world. How could any save a divinely revealed religion +have foreseen the present movement to establish the Sabbath by law? Yes, +and presently I shall see the last atom of the prophecy fulfilled--there +will be a death penalty for failure to obey the Sabbath law! + +Cultivate the great and precious virtue of open-mindedness. Keep your +thinking free, not merely from outer compulsions, but from the more +deadly compulsions of its own making--from prejudices and superstitions. +The prejudices and superstitions of mankind are like those diseased +mental states which are discovered by the psychoanalyst; what he calls a +"complex" in the subconscious mind, a tangle or knot which is a center +of disturbance, and keeps the whole being in a state of confusion. Each +group of men, each sect or class, have their precious dogmas, their +shibboleths, their sacred words and stock phrases which set their whole +beings aflame with fanaticism. They have also their phobias, their words +of terror, which cannot be spoken in their presence without causing a +brain-storm. + +At present the dread word of our time is "Communist." + +You can scarcely say the word without someone telephoning for the +police. And yet, when you meet a Communist, what is he? A worn and +fragile student, who has thought out a way to make the world a better +place to live in, and whose crime is that he tells others about his +idea! Or perhaps you belong to the other side, and then your word of +terror is the word "Capitalist." You meet a Capitalist, and what do you +find? Very likely you find a man who is kindly, generous in his personal +impulses, but bewildered, possibly a little frightened, still more +irritated and made stubborn. So you realize that nearly all men are +better than the institutions and systems under which they live; you +realize the urgent need of applying your reasoning powers to the problem +of social reorganization. + +Cultivate also, in the affairs of your mind, the ancient virtue of +humility. There is an oldtime poem, which perhaps was in your school +readers, "Oh, why should the spirit of mortal be proud?" My answer is, +for innumerable reasons. The spirit of mortal should be proud and must +be proud because life throbs in it, and because life is a marvelous +thing, and the excitement of life is perpetual. Yesterday I met a young +mother; and of what avail is all the pessimism of poets against the +pride of a young mother? "Oh!" she cried, and her face lighted up with +delight. "He said 'Goo'!" Yes, he said "Goo!"--and never since the world +began had there been a baby which had achieved that marvel. Presently it +will be, "Look, look, he is trying to walk!" Then he will be getting +marks at school, and presently he will be displaying signs of genius. +Always it will take an effort of the mind of that young mother to +realize that there are other children in the world as wonderful as her +own; and perhaps it will take many generations of mental effort before +there will be young mothers capable of realizing that some other child +is more wonderful than her child. + +In other words, it is by a definite process of broadening our minds that +we come to realize the lives of others, to transfer to them the interest +we naturally take in our own lives, and to admit them to a state of +equality with ourselves. This is one of the services the mind must +render for us; it is the process of civilizing us. And there is another, +and yet more important task, which is to make clear to us the fact that +we do not altogether make this life of ours, that there is a universe of +power and wisdom which is not ours, but on which we draw. "The fear of +the Lord is the beginning of wisdom," said the Psalmist. We know now +that fear is an ugly emotion, destructive to life; but it may be +purified and made into a true humility, which every thinking man must +feel towards life and its miracles. + +Also the man will have joy, because it is given him to share the high, +marvelous adventure of being. To the pleasures of the body there is a +limit, and it comes quickly; but the pleasures of the mind are infinite, +and no one who truly understands them can have a moment of boredom in +life. To a man who possesses the key to modern thought, who knows what +knowledge is and where to look for it, the life of the mind is a +panorama of delight perpetually unrolled before him. To the minds of our +ancestors there was one universe; but to our minds there are many +universes, and new ones continually discovered. + +The only question is, which one will you choose? Will you choose the +universe of outer space, the material world of infinity? Consider the +smallest insect that you can see, crawling upon the surface of the +earth; small as that insect is in relation to the earth, it is not so +small, by millions of times, as is the earth in relation to the universe +made visible to our eyes by the high-power telescope, plus the +photographic camera, plus the microscope. If you want to know the +miracles of this world of space, read Arrhenius' "The Life of the +Universe," or Simon Newcomb's "Sidelights on Astronomy." Suffice it here +to say that we have a chemistry of the stars, by means of the +spectroscope; that we can measure the speed and direction of stars by +the same means; that we have learned to measure the size of the stars, +and are studying stars which we cannot even see! And then along comes +Einstein, with his theories of "relativity," and makes it seem that we +have to revise a great part of this knowledge to allow for the fact that +not merely everything we look at, but also we ourselves, are flying +every which way through space! + +Or will you choose the universe of the atom, the infinity of the +material world followed the other way, so to speak? Big as is the +universe in relation to our world, and big as is our world in relation +to the insect that crawls on it, the insect is bigger yet in relation to +the molecules which compose its body; and these in turn are millions of +millions of times bigger than the atoms which compose them; and then, +behold, in the atom there are millions of millions of electrons--tiny +particles of electric energy! We cannot see these infinitely minute +things, any more than we can see the electricity which runs our trolley +cars; but we can see their effects, and we can count and measure them, +and deal with them in complicated mathematical formulas, and be just as +certain of their existence as we are of the dust under our feet. If you +wish to explore this wonderland, read Duncan's "The New Knowledge," or +Dr. Henry Smith Williams' "Miracles of Science." + +Or will you choose the universe of the subconscious, our racial past +locked up in the secret chambers of our mind? Or will you choose the +universe of the superconscious, the infinity of genius manifested in the +arts? By the device of art man not merely creates new life, he tests it, +he weighs it and measures it, he tries experiments with it, as the +physicist with the molecule and the astronomer with light. He finds out +what works, and what does not work, and so develops his moral and +spiritual muscles, training himself for his task as maker of life. + +Written words can give but a feeble idea of the wonders that are found +in these enchanted regions of the mind. Here are palaces of splendor +beyond imagining, here are temples with sacred shrines, and +treasure-chambers full of gold and priceless jewels. Into these places +we enter as Aladdin in the ancient tale; we are the masters here, and +all that we see is ours. He who has once got access to it--he possesses +not merely the magic lamp, he possesses all the wonderful fairy +properties of all the tales of our childhood. His is the Tarnhelm and +the magic ring which gives him power over his foes; his is the sword +Excalibur which none can break, and the silver bullet which brings down +all game, and the flying carpet upon which to travel over the earth, and +the house made of ginger-bread, and the three wishes which always come +true, and the philter of love, and the elixir of youth, and the music of +the spheres, and--who knows, some day he may come upon heaven, with St. +Peter and his golden key, and the seraphim singing, and the happy blest +conversing! + + + + +PART TWO + +THE BOOK OF THE BODY + + + + +CHAPTER XVIII + +THE UNITY OF THE BODY + + (Discusses the body as a whole, and shows that health is not a + matter of many different organs and functions, but is one problem + of one organism.) + + +The reader who has followed our argument this far will understand that +we are seldom willing to think of the body as separate from the mind. +The body is a machine, to be sure, but it is a machine that has a +driver, and while it is possible for a sound machine to have a drunken +and irresponsible driver, such a machine is not apt to remain sound very +long. Frequently, when there is trouble with the machine, we find the +fault to be with the driver; in other words, we find that what is needed +for the body is a change in the mind. + +If you wish to have a sound body, and to keep it sound as long as +possible, the first problem for you to settle is what you want to make +of your life; you must have a purpose, and confront the tasks of life +with energy and interest. What is the use of talking about health to a +man who has no moral purpose? He may answer--indeed, I have heard +victims of alcoholism answer--"Let me alone. I have a right to go to +hell in my own way." + +I am aware, of course, that the opposite of the proposition is equally +true. A man cannot enjoy much mental health while he has a sick body. It +is a good deal like the old question, Which comes first, the hen or the +egg? The mind and the body are bound up together, and you may try to +deal with each by turn, but always you find yourself having to deal with +both. Most physicians have a tendency to overlook the mind, and +Christian Scientists make a religion of overlooking the body, and each +pays the penalty in greatly reduced effectiveness. + +My first criticism of medical science, as it exists today, is that it +has a tendency to concentrate upon organs and functions, and to overlook +the central unity of the system. You will find a doctor who specializes +in the stomach and its diseases, and is apt to talk as if the stomach +were a thing that went around in the world all by itself. He will +discuss the question of what goes into your stomach, and overlook to +point out to you that your stomach is nourished by your blood-stream, +which is controlled by your nervous system, which in turn is controlled +by hope, by ambition, by love, by all the spiritual elements of your +being. A single pulse of anger or of fear may make more trouble with the +contents of your stomach than the doctor's pepsins and digestive +ferments can remedy in a week. + +Of course, you may do yourself some purely local injury, and so for a +time have a purely local problem. You may smash your finger, and that is +a problem of a finger; but neglect it for a few days, and let blood +poison set in, and you will be made aware that the human body is one +organism, and also that, in spite of any metaphysical theories you may +hold, your body does sometimes dominate and control your mind. + +Some one has said that the blood is the life; and certainly the blood is +both the symbol and the instrument of the body's unity. The blood +penetrates to all parts of the body and maintains and renews them. If +the blood is normal, the work of renewal does not often fail. If there +is a failure of renewal--that is, a disease--we shall generally find an +abnormal condition of the blood. The distribution of the blood is +controlled by the heart, a great four-chambered pump. One chamber drives +the blood to the lungs, a mass of fine porous membranes, where it comes +into contact with the air, and gives off the poisons which it has +accumulated in its course through the body, and takes up a fresh supply +of oxygen. By another chamber of the heart the blood is then sucked out +of the lungs, and by the next chamber it is driven to every corner of +the body. It takes to every cell of the body the protein materials which +are necessary for the body's renewal, and also the fuel materials which +are to be burned to supply the body's energy; also it takes some thirty +million millions of microscopic red corpuscles which are the carriers of +oxygen, and an even greater number of the white corpuscles, which are +the body's scavengers, its defenders from invasion by outside germs. + +There are certain outer portions of the body, such as nails and the +scales of the skin, which are dead matter, produced by the body and +pushed out from it and no longer nourished by the blood. But all the +still living parts of the body are fed at every instant by the stream of +life. Each cell in the body takes the fuel which it needs for its +activities, and combines it with the oxygen brought by the red +corpuscles; and when the task of power-production has been achieved, the +cell puts back into the blood-stream, not merely the carbon dioxide, but +many complex chemical products--ammonia, uric acid, and the "fatigue +poisons," indol, phenol and skatol. The blood-stream bears these along, +and delivers some to the sweat glands to be thrown out, and some to the +kidneys, and the rest to the lungs. + +All of this complicated mass of activities is in normal health perfectly +regulated and timed by the nervous system. You lie down to sleep, and +your muscles rest, and the vital activities slow up, your heart beats +only faintly; but let something frighten you, and you sit up, and these +faculties leap into activity, your heart begins to pound, driving a +fresh supply of blood and vital energy. You jump up and run, and these +organs all set to work at top speed. If they did not do so, your muscles +would have no fresh energy; they would become paralyzed by the fatigue +poisons, and you would be, as we say, exhausted. + +All the rest of the body might be described as a shelter and accessory +to the life-giving blood-stream; all the rest is the blood-stream's +means of protecting itself and renewing itself. The stomach is to digest +and prepare new blood material, the teeth are to crush it and grind it, +the hands are to seize it, the eyes are to see it, the brain is to +figure out its whereabouts. Man, in his egotism, imagines his little +world as the center of the universe; but the wise old fellow who lives +somewhere deep in our subconsciousness and looks after the welfare of +our blood-stream--he has far better reason for believing that all our +consciousness and our personality exist for him! + +Now, disease is some failure of this blood-stream properly to renew +itself or properly to protect itself and its various subsidiary organs. +When you find yourself with a disease, you call in a doctor; and unless +this doctor is a modern and progressive man, he makes the mistake of +assuming that the disease is in the particular organ where it shows +itself. You have, let us say, "follicular tonsilitis." (These medical +men have a love for long names, which have the effect of awing you, and +convincing you that you are in desperate need of attention.) Your throat +is sore, your tonsils are swollen and covered with white spots; so the +doctor hauls out his little black bag, and makes a swab of cotton and +dips it, say in lysol, and paints your tonsils. He knows by means of the +microscope that your tonsils are covered and filled with a mass of +foreign germs which are feeding upon them; also he knows that lysol +kills these germs, and he gives you a gargle for the same purpose, puts +you to bed, and gradually the swelling goes down, and he tells you that +he has cured you, and sends you a bill for services rendered. But maybe +the swelling does not go down; maybe it gets worse and you die. Then he +tells your family that nature was to blame. Nature is to blame for your +death, but it never occurs to anyone to ask what nature may have had to +do with your recovery. + +I do not know how many thousands of diseases medical science has now +classified. And for each separate disease there are complex formulas, +and your system is pumped full of various mineral and vegetable +substances which have been found to affect it in certain ways. Perhaps +you have a fever; then we give you a substance which reduces the +temperature of your blood-stream. It never occurs to us to reflect that +maybe nature has some purpose of her own in raising the temperature of +the blood; that this might be, so to speak, the heat of conflict, a +struggle she is waging to drive out invading germs; and that possibly it +would be better for the temperature to stay up until the battle is over. +Or maybe the heart is failing; then our medical man is so eager to get +something into the system that he cannot wait for the slow process of +the mouth and the stomach, he shoots some strychnine directly into the +blood-stream. It does not occur to him to reflect that maybe the heart +is slowing up because it is overloaded with fatigue poisons, of which it +cannot rid itself, and that the effect of stimulating it into fresh +activity will be to leave it more dangerously poisoned than before. + +We are dealing here with processes which our ancient mother nature has +been carrying on for a long time, and which she very thoroughly +understands. We ought, therefore, to be sure that we know what is the +final effect of our actions; more especially we ought to be sure that we +understand the cause of the evil, so that we may remove it, and not +simply waste our time treating symptoms, putting plasters on a cancer. +This is the fundamental problem of health; and in order to make clear +what I mean, I am going to begin by telling a personal experience, a +test which I made of medical science some twelve or fourteen years ago, +in connection with one of the simplest and most external of the body's +problems--the hair. First I will tell you what medical science was able +to do for my hair, and second what I myself was able to do, when I put +my own wits to work on the problem. + +I had been overworking, and was in a badly run down condition. I was +having headaches, insomnia, ulcerated teeth, many symptoms of a general +breakdown; among these I noticed that my hair was coming out. I decided +that it was foolish to become bald before I was thirty, and that I would +take a little time off, and spend a little money and have my hair +attended to. I did not know where to go, but I wanted the best authority +available, so I wrote to the superintendent of the largest hospital in +New York, asking him for the name of a reliable specialist in diseases +of the scalp. The superintendent replied by referring me to a certain +physician, who was the hospital's "consulting dermatologist," and I went +to see this physician, whose home and office were just off Fifth Avenue. + +He examined my scalp, and told me that I had dandruff in my hair, and +that he would give me a prescription which would remove this dandruff +and cause my hair to stop falling out. He charged me ten dollars for the +visit, which in those days was more money than it is at present. Being +of an inquiring turn of mind, I tried to get my money's worth by +learning what there was to learn about the human hair. I questioned this +gentleman, and he told me that the hair is a dead substance, and that +its only life is in the root. He explained that barbers often persuade +people to have their hair singed, to keep it from falling out, and that +this was an utterly futile procedure, and likewise all shampooing and +massage, which only caused the hair to fall out more quickly. It was +better even not to wash the hair too often. All that was needed was a +mixture of chemicals to kill the dandruff germs; and so I had the +prescription put up at a drug store, and for a couple of years I +religiously used it according to order, and it had upon my hair +absolutely no effect whatever. + +So here was the best that medical science could do. But still, I did not +want to be bald, so I went among the health cranks--people who +experiment without license from the medical schools. Also, I +experimented upon myself, and now I know something about the human hair, +something entirely different from what the rich and successful +"consulting dermatologist" taught me, but which has kept me from +becoming entirely bald: + +First, the human hair is made by the body, and it is made, like +everything else in the body, out of the blood-stream. It is perfectly +true that the dandruff germ gets into the roots, and makes trouble, and +that the process of killing this germ can be helped by chemicals; but it +does not take a ten-dollar prescription, it only takes ten cents' worth +of borax and salt from the corner grocery. (Put a little into a saucer, +moisten it, rub it into the scalp, and wash it out again.) But +infinitely more important than this is the fact that healthy hair roots +are a product of healthy blood, and that unhealthy blood produces sick +hair roots, which cannot hold in the hair. Most important of all is the +fact that in order to make healthy hair roots the blood must flow fully +and freely to these hair roots; whereas I had been accustomed for many +hours every day of my life to clap around my scalp a tight band which +almost entirely stopped the circulation of the life-giving blood to my +sick hair roots. In other words, by wearing civilized hats, I was +literally starving my hair to death. + +As soon as I realized this I took off my civilized hat, and have never +worn one since. As a rule, I don't wear anything. On the few occasions +when I go into the city, I wear a soft cap. Now and then I experience +inconvenience from this--the elevator boy in some apartment house tells +me to come in by the delivery entrance, or the porter of a sleeping-car +will not let me in at all. I remember discussing these embarrassments +with Jack London, who went even further in his defiance of civilization, +and wore a soft shirt. It was his custom, he said, to knock down the +elevator boys and sleeping-car porters. I answered that that might be +all right for him, because he could do it; whereas I was reduced to the +painful expedient of explaining politely why I went about without the +customary symbols of my economic superiority. + +The "consulting dermatologist" had very solemnly and elaborately warned +me concerning the danger of moving my hair too violently, and thus +causing it to come out; but now my investigations brought out the fact +that moving the hair, that is, massaging the scalp, increases the flow +of blood to the hair roots, and further increases resistance to disease. +As for causing the hair to fall out, I discovered that the more quickly +you cause a hair to fall out, the greater is the chance of your getting +another hair. If a hair is allowed to die in the root, it kills that +root forever, but if it is pulled out before it dies, the root will make +a new hair. Every "beauty parlor" specialist knows this; she knows that +if a hair is pulled, it grows back bigger and stronger than ever, and so +to pull out hair is the last thing you must do if you want to get rid of +hairs! + +I know a certain poet, who happens to have been well-endowed with +physical graces by our mother nature. He finds it worth while to +preserve them--they being accessory to those amorous experiences which +form so large a part of the theme of poetry. Anyhow, this poet values +his beautiful hair, and you will see him sitting in front of his +fireplace, reading a book, and meanwhile his fingers run here and there +over his head, and he grabs a bunch of hair and pulls and twists it. He +has cultivated this habit for many years, and as a result his hair is as +thick and heavy as the "fuzzy-wuzzies" of Kipling's poem. It is a +favorite sport of this poet to lure some rival poet into a contest. He +will mildly suggest that they take hold of each other's hair and have a +tug of war. The rival poet, all unsuspecting, will accept the challenge, +and my friend will proceed to haul him all over the place, to the +accompaniment of howls of anguish from the victim, and howls of glee +from the victor, who has, of course, a scalp as tough as a rhinoceros +hide. + +I am not a poet, and it is not important that I should be beautiful, and +I have been too busy to remember to pull my hair; but by giving up tight +hats, and by limiting the amount of my overworking, I have managed to +keep what hair I had left when the hair specialist had got through with +me. I tell this anecdote at the beginning of my discussion of health, +because it illustrates so well the factors which appear in every case of +disease, and which you must understand in seeking to remedy the trouble. + +We have a phrase which has come down to us from the ancient Latins, +"vis medicatrix naturae," which means the healing power of nature. So +long ago men realized that it is our ancient mother who heals our +wounds, and not the physician. Out of this have grown the cults of +"nature cure" enthusiasts; and according to the fashion of men, they fly +to extremes just as unreasonable and as dangerous as those of the "pill +doctors" they are opposing. I have in mind a man who taught me probably +more than any other writer on health questions, and with whom I once +discussed the subject of typhoid, how it seemed to affect able-bodied +men in the prime of their physical being. This, of course, was contrary +to the theories of nature cure, and my friend had a simple way of +meeting the argument--he refused to believe it. He insisted that, as +with all other germ infections, it must be a question of bodily tone; no +germ could secure lodgment in the human body unless the body's condition +was reduced. + +"But how can you be sure of that?" I argued. "You know that if you go +into the jungle, you are not immune against the scorpion or the cobra or +the tiger. There is nothing in all nature that is safe against every +enemy. What possible right have you to assert that you are immune +against every enemy which can attack your blood-stream?" + +We shall find here, as we find nearly always, that the truth lies +somewhere between the extremes of two warring schools. Our race has been +existing for a long time in a certain environment, and its very +existence implies superiority to that environment. The weaklings, for +whom its hardships were too severe, were weeded out; hostile parasites +invaded their blood-stream and conquered and devoured them. But those +who survived were able to make in their blood-stream the substances +known as anti-bodies, the "opsonins," to help the white blood corpuscles +devour the germs. As the result of their victory, we carry those +anti-bodies in our system, which gives us immunity to those particular +diseases, or at any rate gives us the ability to have the diseases +without dying. Every time we go into a street car, we take into our +throat and lungs the germs of tuberculosis. Examination proves that we +carry around with us in our mouths the germs of all the common throat +and nose diseases, colds, bronchitis, tonsilitis. No matter what +precautions we might take, no matter if we were to gargle our throats +every few minutes, we could never get rid of such germs. And they wage +continual war upon the body's defenses; they batter in vain upon the +gates of our sound health. But take us to some new environment to which +we are not accustomed; take us to Panama in the old days of yellow +fever, or take us to Africa, and let the tsetse fly bite us, and infect +us with "sleeping sickness." Here are germs to which our systems are not +accustomed; and before them we are as helpless as the ancient +knights-at-arms, who had conquered everything in sight, and ruled the +continent of Europe for many hundreds of years, but were wiped off the +earth by a chemist mixing gunpowder. + +In the Marquesas Islands, in the South Seas, there lived a beautiful and +happy race of savages, believed to have been descended, long ages ago, +from Aryan stock. From the point of view of physical perfection, they +were an ideal race, living a blissful outdoor life, which you may read +about in Melville's "Typee," and in O'Brien's "White Shadows in the +South Seas." This race conformed to all the requirements of the nature +enthusiast. They went practically naked, their houses were open all the +time, they lived on the abundant fruits of the earth. To be sure, they +were cannibals, but this was more a matter of religious ceremony than of +diet. They ate their war captives, but this was only after battle, and +not often enough to count, one way or the other, in matters of health. +They had lived for uncounted ages in perfect harmony with their +environment; they were happy and free; and certainly, if such a thing +were possible to human beings, they should have been proof against +germs. But a ship came to one of these islands, and put ashore a sailor +dying of tuberculosis, and in a few years four-fifths of the population +of this island had been wiped out by the disease. What tuberculosis left +were finished by syphilis and smallpox, and today the Marquesans are an +almost extinct race. + +But there is another side to the argument--and one more favorable to the +nature cure enthusiast. We civilized men, by soft living, by +self-indulgence and lack of exercise, may reduce the tone of our body +too far below the standard which our ancestors set for us; and then the +common disease germs get us, then we have colds, sore throats, +tuberculosis. The nature cure advocate is perfectly right in saying that +there is no use treating such diseases; the thing is to restore the body +to its former tone, so that we may be superior to our normal environment +and its strains. + +You know the poem of the "One Hoss Shay," which was so perfectly built +in every part that it ran for fifty years and then collapsed all at once +in a heap. But the human body is not built that way. It always has one +or more places which are weaker than the others, and which first show +the effects of strain. In one person it will take the form of dyspepsia, +in another it will be headaches, in another colds, in another decaying +teeth, in another hardening of the arteries or stiffening of the joints. +But whatever the symptoms may be, the fundamental cause is always the +same, an abnormal condition of the blood-stream, and a consequent +lowering of the body's tone. Therefore, studying any disease and its +cure, you have first the emergency question, are there any germs lodged +in the body, and if so, how can you destroy them? As part of the +problem, you have to ask whether your blood-stream is normal, and if +not, what are the methods by which you can make it normal and keep it +so? Also you have to ask, what are the reasons why your trouble +manifests itself in this or that particular organ? Is there some +weakness or defect there, and can the defect be remedied, or can your +habits be changed so as to reduce the strain on that organ? Are there +any measures you can take to increase the flow of blood to that organ, +and to promote its activity? In the study of your health, you will find +that circumstances differ, and the importance of one factor or the other +will vary; but you will seldom find any problem in which all these +factors do not enter, and you will seldom find an adequate remedy unless +you take all the factors into consideration. + + + + +CHAPTER XIX + +EXPERIMENTS IN DIET + + (Narrates the author's adventures in search of health, and his + conclusions as to what to eat.) + + +Students of the body assure us that every particle of matter which +composes it is changed in the course of seven years. It is obvious that +everything that is a part of the body has at some time to be taken in as +food; so the problem of our diet today is the problem of what our body +shall consist of seven years from now, and probably a great deal sooner. + +I begin this discussion by telling my own personal experiences with +food. I am not going to recommend my diet for anyone else; because one +of the first things I have to say about the subject is that every human +individual is a separate diet problem. But I am going to try to +establish a few principles for your guidance, and more especially to +point out the commonest mistakes. I tell about my own mistakes, because +it happens that I know them more intimately. + +I was brought up in the South, where it is the custom of people to give +a great deal of time and thought to the subject of eating. Among the +people I knew it was always taken for granted that there should be at +least one person in the kitchen devoting all her time to the preparing +of delicious things for the family to eat. This person was generally a +negress, and, needless to say, she knew nothing about the chemistry of +foods, nothing about their constituents or nutritive qualities. All she +knew was about their taste; she had been trained to prepare them in ways +that tasted best, and was continually being advised and exhorted and +sometimes scolded by the ladies of the family on this subject. At the +table the family and the guests never failed to talk about the food and +its taste, and not infrequently the cook would be behind the door +listening to their comments; or else she would wait until after the +meal, for the report which somebody would bring her. + +In addition to this, the ladies of the family were skilled in what is +called "fancy cooking." They did not bother with the meats and +vegetables, but they mixed batter cakes, and made all kinds of elaborate +desserts, and exchanged these treasures and the recipes for them with +other ladies in the neighborhood. In addition to this, there were +certain periods of the week and of the year especially devoted to the +preparing and consuming of great quantities of foods. Once every seven +days the members of the family expressed their worship of their Creator +by eating twice as much as usual; and at another time they celebrated +the birth of their Redeemer by overeating systematically for a period of +two or three weeks. Needless to say, of course, the children brought up +in such an environment all had large appetites and large stomachs, and +their susceptibility to illness was recognized by the setting apart for +them of a whole classification of troubles--"children's diseases," they +were called. In addition to children's diseases, there were coughs and +colds and sore throats and pains in the stomach and constipation and +diarrhea, which the children shared with their adults. + +I had a little more than my share of all these troubles. Always a doctor +would be sent for, and always he was wise and impressive, and always I +was impressed. He gave me some pills or a bottle of liquid, a +teaspoonful every two hours, or something like that--I can hear the +teaspoon rattle in the glass as I write. I had a profound respect for +each and every one of those doctors. He was wisdom walking about in +trousers, and whenever he came, I knew that I was going to get well; and +I did, which proved the case completely. + +Then I grew up, and at the age of eighteen or nineteen became possessed +of a desire for knowledge, and took to reading and studying literally +every minute of the day and a good part of the night. I seldom let +myself go to sleep before two o'clock in the morning, and was always up +by seven and ready for work again. I did this for ten years or so, until +nature brought me to a complete stop. During these ten years I was a +regular experiment station in health; that is, I had every kind of +common ailment, and had it over and over again, so that I could try all +the ways of curing it, or failing to cure it, and keep on trying until I +was sure, one way or the other. I came recently upon a wonderful saying +by John Burroughs, which will be appreciated by every author. "This +writing is an unnatural business. It makes your head hot and your feet +cold, and it stops the digesting of your food." + +This trouble with my digestion began when I was writing my second novel, +camping out on a lonely island at the foot of Lake Ontario. I went to +see a doctor in a nearby town, and he talked learnedly about dyspepsia. +The cause of it, he said, was failure of the stomach to secrete enough +pepsin, and the remedy was to take artificial pepsin, obtained from the +stomach of a pig. He gave me this pig-pepsin in a bottle of red liquid, +and I religiously took some after each meal. It helped for a time; but +then I noticed that it helped less and less. I got so that a simple meal +of cold meat and boiled potatoes would stay in my stomach for hours, in +spite of any amount of the pig-pepsin; I would lie about in misery, +because I wanted to work, and my accursed stomach would not let me. + +All the time, of course, I was using my mind on this problem, groping +for causes. I found that the trouble was worse if I worked immediately +after eating. I found also that it was worse when I was writing books. +When I got sufficiently desperate, I would stop writing books and go off +on a hunting trip. I would tramp twenty miles a day over the mountains, +looking for deer, and I would come back at night too tired to think, and +in a week or two every trace of my trouble would be gone. So my life +regimen came to be--first the writing of a book, and then a hunting trip +to get over the effects of it. But as time went on, alas, I noticed that +the recuperation was more slow and less certain. The working times grew +shorter, and the hunting times grew longer, until finally I had got to a +point where I couldn't work at all; I would go to pieces in a few days +if I tried it. It was apparently the end of my stomach, and the end of +my sleeping, and the end of my writing books. My teeth were decaying, +not merely outside but inside; I would have abscesses, and most +frightful agonies to endure. I would lie awake all night, and it would +seem to me that I could feel my body going to pieces--an extremely +depressing sensation! + +I had been trying experiments all this time. I had been going to one +doctor after another, and had got to realize that the doctors only +treated symptoms; they treated the "diseases" when they appeared--but +nobody ever told you how to keep the "diseases" from appearing. Why +could there not be a doctor who would look you over thoroughly, and tell +you everything that was wrong with you, and how to set it right? A +doctor who would tell you exactly how to live, so that you might keep +well all the time! I was studying economics, and becoming suspicious of +my fellow man; it occurred to me that possibly it might be embarrassing +to a doctor, if he cured all his patients, and taught them how to live, +so that none of them would ever have to come to him again. It occurred +to me that possibly this might be the reason why "preventive medicine," +constructive health work, was getting so little attention from the +medical fraternity. + +Two things that plagued me were headache and constipation, and they were +obviously related. For constipation, the world had one simple remedy; +you "took something" every night or every morning, and thought no more +about it. My stout and amiable grandmother had drunk a glass of Hunyadi +water every morning for the last thirty or forty years, and that she +finally died of "fatty degeneration of the heart" was not connected with +this in the mind of anyone who knew her. As for the headaches, people +would tell you this, that, and the other remedy, and I would try +them--that is, unless they happened to be drugs. I was getting more and +more shy of drugs. I had some blessed instinct which saved me from +stimulants and narcotics. I had never used tea, coffee, alcohol or +tobacco, and in my worst periods of suffering I never took to putting +myself to sleep with chloral, or to stopping my headaches with +phenacetin. + +At the end of six or eight years of purgatory, I came upon a prospectus +of the Battle Creek Sanitarium. This seemed to me exactly what I wanted; +this was constructive, it dealt with the body as a whole. So I spent a +couple of months at the "San," and paid them something like a thousand +dollars to tell me all they could about myself. + +The first thing they told me was that meat-eating was killing me. It was +perfectly obvious, was it not, that meat is a horrible feeding place for +germs, that rotten meat is dreadfully offensive, and likewise digested +meat--consider the excreta of cats, for example! I listened solemnly +while Doctor Kellogg read off the numbers of billions of bacteria per +gram in the contents of the colon of a carnivorous person. It certainly +seemed proper that the author of "The Jungle" should be a vegetarian, so +I became one, and did my best to persuade myself that I enjoyed the +taste of the patent meat-substitutes which are served in hundred calory +portions in the big Sanitarium dining-room. + +There also I met Horace Fletcher, and learned to chew every particle of +food thirty-two times, and often more. I exercised in the Sanitarium +gymnasium, and watched the sterilized dancing--the men with the men and +the women with the women. I was patiently polite with the Seventh Day +Adventist religion, and laid in a supply of postage stamps on Friday +evening. Finally, and most important of all, I went once a day to the +"treatment rooms," and had my abdomen doctored alternately with hot +cloths and ice. By this means I kept up a flow of blood in the +intestinal tract, and stimulated these organs to activity; so my +constipation was relieved, and my headaches were less severe--so long as +I stayed at the Sanitarium, and was boiled and frozen once every day. +But when I left the Sanitarium, and abandoned the treatments, the +troubles began to return. Meantime, however, I had written a book in +praise of vegetarianism--a book which has got into the libraries, and +cannot be got out again! + +I went on to a new variety of health crank, the real "nature cure" +practitioners. Vegetarianism was not enough, they insisted; the evil had +begun long before, when man first ruined his food and destroyed its +nutritive value by means of fire. There was only one certain road to +health, and that was by the raw food route, the monkey and squirrel +diet. I had gone out to California for a winter's rest, and decided I +would give this plan a thorough trial. For five months I lived by +myself, and the only cooked food I ate was shredded wheat biscuit. For +the rest I lived on nuts and salads and fresh and dried fruits; and +during this period I enjoyed such health as I had never known in my life +before. I had literally not a single ailment. I was not merely well, but +bubbling over with health. I had a friend who said it cheered him up +just to see me walk down the street. + +I thought that it was entirely the raw food, and that I had solved the +problem forever; but I overlooked the fact that during those five months +I had done no hard brain work, no writing. I went back to writing again, +and things began to go wrong; my wonderful raw foods took to making +trouble in my stomach--and I assure you that until you try, you have no +idea the amount of trouble that can be made in your stomach by a load of +bananas and soaked prunes which has gone wrong! For a year or two I +agonized; I could not give up my wonderful raw food diet, because I had +always before me the vision of those months in California, and could +not understand why it was not that way again. + +But the time came when I would eat a meal of raw food, and for hours +afterwards my stomach would feel like a blown-up football. Then somebody +gave me a book by Dr. Salisbury on the subject of the meat diet. Of all +the horrible things in the world, a meat diet sounded to me the worst; I +had been a vegetable enthusiast for three years, and thought of eating +meat as you would think of cannibalism. But there has never been a time +in my life when I would not hear something new, and give it a trial if +it sounded well; so I read the books of Doctor Salisbury, which have +long been out of print, and have been curiously neglected by the medical +profession. Salisbury was a real pioneer, an experimenter. He wrote in +the days before the germ theory, and so missed his guess regarding +tuberculosis, but he perceived that most of the common diseases are +caused by dietetic errors, and he set to work to prove it. He showed +that hog cholera and army diarrhea are the same disease, and come from +the same cause. He took a squad of men and fed them on army biscuit for +two or three weeks, until they were nearly dead, and then he put them on +a diet of lean beef and completely cured them in a few days. He did this +same thing with one kind of food after another, and in each case he +would bring his men as near to death as he dared, and then he would cure +them. He showed that meat is the only food which contains all the +elements of nutrition, the only food upon which a person can live for an +unlimited period. As Salisbury said, "Beef is first, mutton is second, +and the rest nowhere." + +It was his idea that tuberculosis of the lungs is caused by spores of +fermenting starch clogging the minute blood vessels. He claimed that +there is an early stage of tuberculosis, in which the spores are +floating in the blood stream; he put large numbers of patients upon a +diet of lean beef, ground and cooked, and he cured them of tuberculosis, +and if one of them would break the diet and yield to a craving for +starch or sugar, Salisbury claimed that he could find it out an hour or +two later by examining a drop of their blood under the microscope. In +his books he described vividly the effects of an excess of starch and +sugar in the diet. He called it "making a yeast-pot of your stomach"; +and you can imagine how that hit my stomach, full of half digested +bananas and prunes! + +I tried the Salisbury diet, and satisfied myself of this one fact, that +lean meat is for brain-workers the most easily assimilated of all foods. +Salisbury claimed that you could not overeat on meat, but I do not +believe there is any food you cannot overeat on, nor do I believe that +anyone should try to live on one kind of food. We are by nature +omnivorous animals. Our digestive tracts are similar to those of hogs +and monkeys, which eat all varieties of food they can get. One of the +common errors of the nature cure enthusiast is to cite the monkey and +the squirrel as fruit and nut-eating animals, when the fact is that +monkeys and squirrels eat meat when they can get it, and the ardor with +which they go bird-nesting is evidence enough that they crave it. If +there is any race of man which is vegetarian, you will find that it is +from necessity alone. The beautiful South Sea Islanders, who are the +theme of the raw fooders' ecstasy, spend a lot of their time catching +fish, and sometimes they kill a pig, and celebrate the event precisely +as Christians celebrate the birth of their Redeemer. + +From this you may be able to guess my conclusions, as the result of much +painful blundering and experimenting. So far as diet is concerned, I +belong to no school; I have learned something from each one, and what I +have learned from a trial of them all is to be shy of extreme statements +and of hard and fast rules. To my vegetarian friends who argue that it +is morally wrong to take sentient life, I answer that they cannot go for +a walk in the country without committing that offense, for they walk on +innumerable bugs and worms. We cannot live without asserting our right +to subject the lower forms of life to our purposes; we kill innumerable +germs when we swallow a glass of grape juice, or for that matter a glass +of plain water. I shall be much surprised if the advance of science does +not some day prove to us that there are rudimentary forms of +consciousness in all vegetable life; so we shall justify the argument of +Mr. Dooley, who said, in reviewing "The Jungle," that he could not see +how it was any less a crime to cut off a young tomato in its prime, or +to murder a whole cradleful of baby peas in the pod! + +There is no question that meat-eating is inconvenient, expensive, and +dirty. I have no doubt that some day we shall know enough to be able to +find for every individual a diet which will keep him at the top of his +power, without the maintenance of the slaughter-house. But we do not +possess that knowledge at present; at least, I personally do not possess +it. I happen to be one of those individuals--there are many of +them--with whom milk does not agree; and if you rule out milk and meat, +you find yourself compelled to get a great deal of your protein from +vegetable sources, such as peas, beans and nuts. All these contain a +great deal of starch, and thus there is no way you can arrange your diet +to escape an excess of starch. Excess of starch, so my experience has +convinced me, is the deadliest of all dietetic errors. It is also the +commonest of errors, the cause, not merely of the common throat and nose +infections, but of constipation, and likewise of diarrhea, of anemia, +and thus, through the weakening of the blood stream, of all disorders +that spring from this source--decaying teeth and rheumatism, boils, bad +complexion, and tuberculosis. Starch foods are the cheapest, therefore +they form the common diet of the poor, and are responsible for the +diseases of undernourishment to which the poor are liable. + +On the other hand, of course, there are perfectly definite diseases of +overnourishment; high blood pressure, which culminates in apoplexy; +kidney troubles, which result from the inability of these organs to +eliminate all the waste matter that is delivered to them; fatty +degeneration of the heart, or of the liver, or any of the vital organs. +You may cause a headache by clogging the blood stream through +overeating, or you may cause it by eating small quantities of food, if +those foods are unbalanced, and do not contain the mineral elements +necessary to the making of normal blood. Whatever the trouble with your +health, it is my judgment that in two cases out of three you will find +it dates back to errors in diet. I do not think I exaggerate in saying +that a knowledge of what to eat and how much to eat is two-thirds of the +knowledge of how to keep yourself in permanent health. + + + + +CHAPTER XX + +ERRORS IN DIET + + (Discusses the different kinds of foods, and the part they play in + the making of health and disease.) + + +It is my purpose in this chapter to lay down a few general principles to +aid you in the practical problem of selecting the best diet for +yourself. But it must be made clear at the outset that there can be no +hard and fast rule. All human bodies are more or less alike, but on the +other hand all are more or less different. Modern civilization has given +very few bodies the chance to be perfect; nearly all have some weakness, +some abnormality, and need some special modification in diet to fit +their particular problem. The ideal in each case would be a complete +study of the individual system. Some day, no doubt, medical science will +analyze the digestive juices and the gland secretions and the +blood-stream of every human being, and say, you need a certain +percentage of starch and a certain percentage of protein; you need such +and such proportion of phosphorus and iron; you should avoid certain +acids--and so on. But at present we are devoting our science to the task +of killing and maiming other people, instead of enabling ourselves to +live in health and happiness; so it is that most of those who read this +book will be too poor to command the advice of a diet specialist. The +best you can do is to get a few general ideas and try them out, watching +your own body and learning its peculiarities. + +Human food contains three elements: proteins, fats and carbohydrates. +The proteins are the body-building material, and the foods which are +rich in proteins are lean meat, the white of eggs, milk and cheese, +nuts, peas and beans. A certain amount of this kind of food is needed by +the body. If it is missing, the body will gradually waste away. If too +much of it is taken, the body can turn it into energy-making material, +but this is a wasteful process, and the best evidence appears to be that +it is a strain upon the system. Experiments conducted by Professor +Chittenden of Yale have proven conclusively that men can live and +maintain body weight upon much less protein food than previous dietetic +standards had indicated. + +The fats are found in fat meats and dairy products, and in nuts, olives, +and vegetable oils. The body is prepared to digest and assimilate a +certain amount of fat, no one knows how much. I have found in my own +case that I require a great deal less than people ordinarily eat. I have +for many years maintained good health upon a diet containing no more fat +than one gets with lean meat once or twice a day. I never use butter or +olive oil, nor any fat in cooking. My reason for this is that fats are +the most highly concentrated form of food, and the easiest upon which to +overeat. Excess of fat is a cause, not merely of obesity, but also of +boils and pimples and "pasty" complexion, and other signs of a clogged +blood-stream. + +The third variety of food is the carbohydrates, and of these there are +two kinds, starches and sugars. Starch is the white material of the +grains and tubers; the principal food element of bread and cereals, +rice, potatoes, bananas, and many prepared substances such as +corn-starch, tapioca, farina and macaroni. Starchy foods compose +probably half the diet of the average human being. In my own case, they +compose about one-sixth, so you see to what extent my beliefs differ +from the common. Starch is not really necessary in the diet at all. I +have a friend who is subject to headaches, and finds relief from them by +a diet of meat, salads, and fresh fruits exclusively. The first thing +that excess of starch or sugar does is to ferment in the system, and +cause flatulence and gas. But strange as it may seem, if the excess of +starch is perfectly digested and assimilated into the system, the +condition may be worse yet, because you may have a great quantity of +energy-producing material, without the necessary mineral elements which +the body requires in the handling of it. + +If you cremate a human body and study the ashes chemically, you find a +score or more of mineral salts. You find these in the blood, and no +blood is normal and no body can be kept normal which does not contain +the right percentage of these elements. It is not merely that they are +needed to build bones and teeth; they are needed at every instant for +the chemistry of the cells. Every time you move a muscle, you fill the +cells of that muscle with a certain amount of waste matter. You may +prove how deadly this matter is by binding a tight cord about your arm, +and then trying to use the arm. We are only at the beginning of +understanding the subtle chemistry of the body; but this much we know, +the cells transform the waste products, and they are thrown out of the +system as ammonia, uric acid, etc.; and for this process the blood must +have a continual supply of many mineral salts. + +So vital are they, and so fatal to health is their absence, that it is +far better for you to eat nothing at all than to eat improperly balanced +foods, or foods which are deficient in the organic salts. You may prove +this to yourself by a simple experiment. Put two chickens in separate +pens, where nobody can feed them but yourself. Feed one of them on water +and white bread, or corn starch, or sugar, or any energy-making +substance which contains little of the mineral elements. Feed the other +chicken on plain water. You will find that the one which has the food +will quickly become droopy and sickly; its feathers will fall out, it +will have what in human beings would be known as headaches, colds, sore +throats, decaying teeth and boils. At the end of a couple of weeks it +will be a dead chicken. The one which you feed on water alone will not +be a happy chicken, neither will it be a fat chicken, but it will be a +live chicken, and a chicken without disease. I am going later on to +discuss the subject of fasting. For the present I will merely say that a +chicken which has nothing but water is living upon its own flesh, and +therefore has a meat diet, containing the mineral elements necessary to +the elimination of the fatigue poisons. + +I am going to try not to be dogmatic in this book, and not to say things +that I do not know. I confess to innumerable uncertainties about the +subject of diet; but one thing I think I do know, and that is that human +beings should eliminate absolutely from their food those modern +artificial products, which look so nice, and are so easy to handle, and +are put up in packages with pretty labels, and have been in some way +artificially treated to remove the wastes and impurities--including the +vital mineral salts. Among such food substances I include lard and its +imitations made from cottonseed oil, white flour, all the prepared and +refined cereals, polished rice, tapioca, farina, corn starch, and +granulated and powdered sugar. Any of these substances will kill a +chicken in a couple of weeks, and the only reason they take a longer +time to kill you is because you mix them with other kinds of foods. But +to the extent that you eat them, your diet is deficient; and do not +console yourself with the idea that the mineral elements will be made up +from other foods, because you don't know that, and nobody else knows it. +Nobody knows just how much of any particular organic salt the body +needs. All we know is that the primitive races, which ate natural foods, +enjoyed vigorous health, while the American people, who consume the +greatest proportion of the so-called "refined" foods, have the very best +dentists and the very worst teeth in the world. + +There are many kinds of sugar, found in the sugar-cane and the beet, and +in all fruits. Sugar may also be made from any form of starch; this is +glucose, which is put up in cans and sold as an imitation of maple +syrup. The ordinary granulated and powdered sugar is made by taking from +the natural syrup every trace of mineral elements; so I have no +hesitation in saying that the ordinary cane sugar and beet sugar of our +breakfast tables and our confectionery stores is not a food, but a slow +poison. The causes of the wonderful progress of American dentistry, +which is the marvel of the civilized world, are cane sugar, white flour, +and the frying-pan, each of which dietetic crimes I shall take up in +turn. + +We have the richest country in the world; we eat more food, probably by +50 per cent, and we waste more food, probably by 500 per cent, than any +other people in the world; and yet, go to any small farming community in +America, and what do you find? You find the teeth of the young children +rotting in their heads, and having to be pulled out before their second +teeth come. You find these second teeth rotting often before the age of +twenty. A friend of mine, who knows the American farmer, sums it up this +way: "He has two things that he requires if he is to be really +respectable and happy. First, he wants to get all the fireplaces in his +home boarded up, and all the windows nailed tight; and second, he wants +to get all his teeth out, and an artificial set installed. Out of the +farmers' wives in my neighborhood, not one in ten keeps her own teeth +until she is thirty." + +If you go to the Balkans, where the peasants live on sour milk, with +grains which they grind at home; or to southern Italy and Sicily, where +they live on cheese and black bread and olives; or among savage people, +where they hunt and fish and gather the natural fruits, you find old +men without a single decayed tooth. There must be some reason for this, +and the reason is found in our denatured grocery-store foods. The +farmer's wife will gather up her eggs and her butter and cheeses, and +take them to the store and bring back cans of lard and packages of +sugar. The farmer will sell his perfectly good wheat and corn meal, and +bring back in his wagon cases of "refined" cereal foods, for which he +has paid ten times the price of the grain! + +Dentists will tell you that the way candy injures the teeth is by +sticking to them and fermenting, forming acids, which destroy the tooth +structure. And that may be a part of the reason. But the principal +reason why the teeth decay is because the blood-stream is abnormal, and +is unable to keep up the repairs of the body. Your teeth are living +structures, just as much as any other part of you, and they will resist +decay if you supply them with the proper nourishment. + +You need sugar; you need a considerable quantity of it every day. Nature +provides this sugar in combination with the organic salts, and also with +the precious vitamines, whose function in the body we are only beginning +to investigate. All the mineral substances which give the color and +flavor to oranges, apples, peaches, grapes, figs, prunes, raisins--all +these you take out when you make sugar. Or perhaps you put in some +imitations of them, made from coal tar chemicals, and drink them at your +soda fountains! So little appreciation has the American farmer's wife of +natural fruits, that when she preserves them, she considers it necessary +to fill them full of cane sugar; in fact, she has a notion that they +won't keep unless she cooks them up with sugar! So snobbish are we +Americans about our eating, that we make the best of our foods into +bywords. We make jokes in our comic papers about the "boarding-house +prune"; and yet prunes and raisins are among the wholesomest foods we +have, and if we fed them to our children instead of cakes and candy and +coal-tar flavorings, our dental industry would rapidly decline. + +And the same thing is true of bread. When I was a boy, I thought I had +to have hot bread at least twice a day, and if I were called upon to eat +bread that was more than a day old, I felt that I was being badly abused +by life. I used to read fairy stories, in which something called "black +bread" was mentioned, something obscure and terrible; the symbol of +human misery was Cinderella sitting in the ashes and eating a crust of +dry "black bread." But now since I have studied diet, I have taken my +place with Cinderella. I can afford to buy whatever kind of bread I +want; I can have the best white bread, piping hot, three times a day, if +I want it; but what I eat three times a day is a crust of hard dry +"black bread." + +"Black bread" is the fairy story name for bread made of the whole grain. +It is eaten that way by the peasant because he has no patent milling +machinery at his disposal, to fan away the life-giving elements of his +food. Nearly all the mineral elements of the grain are contained in the +outer, dark-colored portion. The white part is almost pure starch; and +when you use white flour, you are not merely starving your blood-stream, +your bones, and your teeth, you are also depriving the digestive tract +of the rough material which it is accustomed to handle, and which it +needs to stimulate it to action. I am aware that whole grain products +are a trifle less easy of digestion, but we should not pamper and weaken +our digestive tract any more than we let our muscles get flabby for lack +of action. We should require our stomachs to handle the ordinary natural +foods, precisely as we accustom our body to react from cold water, and +to stand honest hard work. + +For ages the Japanese peasants have lived on rice, with a little dried +fish. Quite recently there began to spread throughout Japan a mysterious +disease known as beri-beri. It was especially prevalent in the army, and +so the scientists of Japan set out to discover the cause, and it proved +to be the modern practice of polishing rice, which takes off the outer +coating of the grain. Rice is one of the most wholesome of foods, if it +is eaten in the natural state; but in order to get it in that state in +this country, you have to find a special food store of the health +cranks, and have to pay a special price for it. You have to pay a higher +price for whole wheat bread--because ninety-nine people out of a hundred +are ignorant, and insist upon having their foodstuffs pretty to look at! + +Probably you have read sea stories, and know of the horrors of scurvy. +Scurvy and beri-beri are similar diseases, with a similar cause. The men +on the old sailing ships used to have to live on white biscuit and salt +meat, and they always knew that to recover from their gnawing illness, +they must get to port and get fresh vegetables and fruits, especially +onions and lemons, which contain the vitamines as well as the salts. But +you will see the modern housewife going into the grocery store, and +surveying the shelves of "package" goods, and in her ignorance picking +out the scurvy-making products, and frequently paying for them a much +higher price than for the health-making ones! + +Then, when she has got her white flour, and her cane sugar, and her +lard, she will take it home, and mix it up, and put it in the frying +pan, and serve it hot to her husband and children. Nature has so +constituted her husband and children that they digest starch before they +digest fat; that is to say, the starch is digested mainly in the +stomach, while the fat is digested mainly after the food has been passed +on into the small intestine. But by frying the starch before it is +eaten, the housewife carefully takes each grain of the starch and +protects it with a little covering of fat. Thus the digestive juices of +the stomach cannot get at the starch, and the starch goes down into the +small intestine a good part undigested. If some evil spirit, wishing to +make trouble for the human organism, had charge of the laying out of our +diet, he could hardly devise anything worse than that. And yet it would +be no exaggeration to say that the average American, especially the +average farmer, eats out of a frying-pan. If his potatoes have to be +warmed over, they go into the frying-pan; his precious batter-cakes and +doughnuts are cooked in a frying-pan, and all his precious hot breads +are mixed with lard. If it were not for the fact that you cannot broil a +beefsteak over a modern gas range, I would tell you that the first step +toward health for the average American would be to throw the frying-pan +out of the window, and to throw the cook-book after it. + +The whole modern art of cooking is largely a perversion; a product of +idleness, vanity, and sensuality. It is one of the monstrous growths +consequent upon our system of class exploitation. We have a number of +idle people with nothing to do but eat, and who demonstrate their +superiority to the rest of us by their knowledge of superior foods, and +superior ways of preparing them. They have the wealth of the world at +their disposal, also the services of their fellow man without limit, and +they set their fellow man to work to enable them to give elaborate +banquets, and to sit in solemn state and gorge themselves, and to have a +full account of their behavior published in the next morning's +newspapers. A great part of this perverse art we owe to what is called +the "ancient régime" in France--a régime which starved the French +peasantry until they were black skinned beasts hiding in caves and +hollow trees. So it comes about that our modern food depravity parades +itself in French names, and American snobbery requires of its devotees a +course in the French language sufficient to read a menu card. Needless +to say, this elaborate gastronomic art has been developed without any +relation to health, or any thought of the true needs of the body. It is +one of the products of the predatory system which we can say is absolute +waste. Having done my own cooking for the past twenty-five years, I make +bold to say that I can teach anybody all he needs to know about cooking +in one lesson of half an hour, and that the total amount of cooking +required for a large family can be done by one person in twenty minutes +a day. + +In the first place, a great many foods do not have to be cooked at all, +and are made less fit by cooking. In the next place, the only cooking +that is ever required is a little boiling, or in the case of meat, +roasting or broiling. In the next place, the art of combining foods in +cooking is a waste art, because no foods should be combined in cooking. +Every food has its own natural flavor, which is lost in combination, and +if anybody is unable to enjoy the natural flavors of simply cooked +foods, there is one thing to say to that person, and that is to wait +until he is hungry. Let him take a ten-mile walk in the open air, and he +will have more interest in his next meal. I am not a fanatic, and have +no desire to destroy the pleasures of life; I am recommending to people +that they should seek the higher pleasures of the intellect, and those +pleasures are not found in standing over a cook stove, nor in compelling +others to stand over a cook stove. Moreover, I know that the artificial +mixing of foods to tempt peoples' palates is one of the principal causes +of overeating, and therefore of ill health, and therefore of the +ultimate destruction of the pleasures of life. + +I went out from the world of cooks before I was twenty. I wanted to +write a book, and to be let alone while I was doing it. I lived by +myself, and found out about cooking by practical experience. On a few +occasions since then, I have lived in a house with a servant, and had +some cooking done for me, but it was always because somebody else +wanted it, and against my protest. In the last ten years we have had no +servant in our home, and because I want my wife to give her energy to +more important things than feeding me, I do my share of getting every +meal. We have worked out a system of housekeeping by which we get a meal +in five minutes, and when we finish it, it takes three minutes to clear +things away. + +If I tell you what I eat, please do not get the impression that I am +advising you to eat these same things. My diet consists of the foods +which I have found by long experience agree with me. There are many +other foods which are just as wholesome, but which I do not eat, either +because they don't happen to agree with me, or because I don't care for +them so much. I am fond of fruit, and eat more of that than of anything +else. It is not a cheap article of diet, but you can save a good deal if +you buy it in quantities, as I do. A little later I am going to discuss +the prices of foods. + +For breakfast I eat a slice of whole wheat bread, three good-sized +apples, stewed, and eight or ten dates. It takes practically no time to +prepare this breakfast. The bread has to be baked, of course, but this +is done wholesale; we buy four loaves at a time, and it is just as good +at the end of a couple of weeks as when we buy it. When I lived in the +world of cooks, I would call for apple sauce; which meant that somebody +had to pare apples, cut them up, stew them, mix them with sugar, grate a +little nutmeg over them, set them on ice, and serve them to me on a +glass dish, with a little pitcher of cream. But now what happens is that +I put a dozen apples in a big sauce-pan and let them simmer while I am +eating. We have a rule in our family that we do not do any cooking +except while we are eating, because if we try it at any other time of +the day, we get buried in a book or in a manuscript, and forget about it +until the smoke causes somebody in the street to summon the fire +department. So the apples for my breakfast were cooked during last +night's supper; and during the breakfast there will be some vegetable +cooking for lunch. + +At this lunch, which is my "square meal," I eat a large slice of +beefsteak, say a third of a pound. Jack London used to say that the only +man who could cook a beefsteak was the fireman of a railway locomotive, +because he had a hot, clean shovel. The best imitation you can get is a +hot, clean frying-pan; and when you are sure that it is hot, let it get +hotter. The whole secret of cooking meat is to keep the juices inside, +and to do that you must cook it quickly. When you slap it down on a hot +frying-pan, the meat is seared, and the juices stay inside, and if you +do not turn it over until it is almost ready to burn, you don't need to +cook it very long on the other side. That is the one secret of cooking +worth knowing; it doesn't cost anything, and saves time instead of +wasting it. As I have never found anybody else capable of learning it, I +reserve the cooking of the beefsteak as one of my family duties. + +To continue the lunch, a slice of whole wheat bread, and a large +quantity of some fresh salad, such as celery, or lettuce and tomatoes, +without dressing. For a part of this may be substituted a vegetable, one +or two beets or turnips, cooked during a previous meal, and warmed up in +a couple of minutes; and we do not throw away the tops of the turnips +and beets and celery, we put them on and cook them, and they serve for +the next day's meal. If you would eat a large quantity of such "greens" +once a day, you would escape many of the ills that your flesh is at +present heir to. Finally, for dessert, an orange and a small handful of +raisins, or one or two figs. + +The evening meal will be the same as the breakfast; except once in a +while when I am especially hungry, and want some meat. I am writing in +the winter season, so the fruits suggested are those available in +winter. The menu will be varied with every kind of fruit at the season +when it is cheapest and most easily obtained. The beefsteak will appear +at about three meals out of four; occasionally it will be replaced by +the lean meat of pork or mutton, or by fish. The bread may be replaced +by rice, or boiled potatoes, either white or sweet, and occasionally by +graham crackers. I know that these contain a little fat and sugar, but I +try not to be fanatical about my diet, and the rules I suggest do not +carry the death penalty. There was a time when I used to allow my +friends to make themselves miserable by trying to provide me with +special foods when they invited me to a meal, but now I tell them to +"forget it," and I politely nibble a little of everything, and eat most +of what I find wholesome; if there is nothing wholesome, I content +myself with the pretense of a meal. If I find myself in a restaurant, I +quite shamelessly get a piece of apple or pumpkin pie, omitting most of +the crust. As I don't go away from home more than once or twice a month, +I do not have to worry about such indulgence. The main thing is to +arrange one's home diet on sound lines, and learn to enjoy the simple +and wholesome foods, of which there is a great variety obtainable, and +at prices possible to all but the wretchedly poor. + +In conclusion, since everybody likes to have a feast now and then, I +specify that my diet regimen allows for holidays. Assuming that I am +your guest for a day, and that you wish to "blow" me, regardless of +expense, here will be the menu. Breakfast, some graham crackers, a bunch +of raisins, a can of sliced pineapple in winter, or a big chunk of +watermelon in summer. Dinner, or lunch, roast pork, a baked apple, a +baked sweet potato and some spinach. Supper, lettuce, dates, and a dish +of popcorn flavored with peanut butter. Try this next Christmas! + +P. S. After this book had been put into type, I chanced to be looking +over Herbert Quick's illuminating book, "On Board the Good Ship Earth." +Discussing the importance of certain organic salts to the body, Dr. +Quick states: "Animals have been fed, as an experiment, on foods +deficient in phosphorus. For a while they seemed to do well. Then they +collapsed. It takes only three months of a ration without phosphorus to +wreck an animal. Individual creatures were killed after a month of this +diet, and it was found that the flesh was taking the phosphate--for the +phosphorus exists in the body in that form--from the bones to supply its +need. In other words, the body was eating its own bones! When this +process had robbed the bones to the limit, the collapse came, and the +animal could never recover." + + + + +CHAPTER XXI + +DIET STANDARDS + + (Discusses various foods and their food values, the quantities we + need, and their money cost.) + +I think there is no more important single question about health than the +question of how much food we should eat. It is one about which there is +a great deal of controversy, even among the best authorities. We shall +try here for a common-sense solution. At the outset we have to remind +ourselves of the distinction we tried to draw between nature and man. To +what extent can civilized man rely upon his instincts to keep him in +perfect health? + +Let us begin by considering the animals. How is their diet problem +solved? Horses and cattle in a wild state are adjusted to certain foods +which they find in nature, and so long as they can find it, they have no +diet problem. Man comes, and takes these animals and domesticates them; +he observes their habits, and gives to them a diet closely approaching +the natural one, and they get along fairly well. But suppose the man, +with his superior skill in agriculture, taking wild grain and planting +it, reaping and threshing it by machinery, puts before his horse an +unlimited quantity of a concentrated food such as oats, which the horse +can never get in a natural state--will that horse's instincts guide it? +Not at all. Any horse will kill itself by overeating on grain. + +I have read somewhere a clever saying, that a farm is a good place for +an author to live, provided he can be persuaded not to farm it. But once +upon a time I had not heard that wise remark, and I owned and tried to +run a farm. I had two beautiful cows of which I was very proud, and one +morning I woke up and discovered that the cows had got into the pear +orchard and had been feeding on pears all night. In a few hours they +both lay with bloated stomachs, dying. A farmer told me afterwards that +I might have saved their lives, if I had stuck a knife into their +stomachs to let out the gas. I do not know whether this is true or not. +But my two dead cows afford a perfect illustration of the reason why +civilized man cannot rely upon his instincts and his appetites to tell +him when he has had enough to eat. He can only do this, provided he +rigidly restricts himself to the foods which he ate in the days when his +teeth and stomach and bowels were being shaped by the process of natural +selection. If he is going to eat any other than such strictly natural +foods, he will need to apply his reason to his diet schedule. + +In a state of nature man has to hunt his food, and the amount that he +finds is generally limited, and requires a lot of exercise to get. +Explorers in Africa give us a picture of man's life in the savage state, +guided by his instincts and very little interfered with by reason. The +savages will starve for long periods, then they will succeed in killing +a hippopotamus or a buffalo, and they will gorge themselves, and nearly +all of them will be ill, and several of them will die. So you see, even +in a state of nature, and with natural foods, restraint is needed, and +reason and moral sense have a part to play. + +What do reason and moral sense have to tell us about diet? Our bodily +processes go on continuously, and we need at regular intervals a certain +quantity of a number of different foods. The most elementary experiment +will convince us that we can get along, maintain our body weight and our +working efficiency upon a much smaller quantity of food than we +naturally crave. Civilized custom puts before us a great variety of +delicate and appetizing foods, upon which we are disposed to overeat; +and we are slow observers indeed if we do not note the connection +between this overeating and ill health. So we are forced to the +conclusion that if we wish to stay well, we need to establish a +censorship over our habits; we need a different diet regimen from the +haphazard one which has been established for us by a combination of our +instincts with the perversions of civilization. + +Up to a few years ago, it was commonly taken for granted by authorities +on diet that what the average man actually eats must be the normal thing +for him to eat. Governments which were employing men in armies, and at +road building, and had to feed them and keep them in health, made large +scale observations as to what the men ate, and thus were established the +old fashioned "diet standards." They are expressed in calories, which is +a heat unit representing the quantity of fuel required to heat a certain +small quantity of water a certain number of degrees. In order that you +may know what I am talking about, I will give a rough idea of the +quantity of the more common foods which it takes to make 100 calories: +one medium sized slice of bread, a piece of lean cooked steak the size +of two fingers, one large apple, three medium tablespoonfuls of cooked +rice or potatoes, one large banana, a tablespoonful of raisins, five +dates, one large fig, a teaspoonful of sugar, a ball of butter the size +of your thumbnail, a very large head of lettuce, three medium sized +tomatoes, two-thirds of a glass of milk, a tablespoonful of oil. You +observe, if you compare these various items, how little guidance +concerning food is given by its bulk. You may eat a whole head of +lettuce, weighing nearly a pound, and get no more food value than from a +half ounce of olive oil which you pour over it. You may eat enough lean +beefsteak to cover your plate, and you will not have eaten so much as a +generous helping of butter. A big bowl of strawberries will not count +half so much as the cream and sugar you put over them. So you may +realize that when you eat olive oil, butter, cream, and sugar, you are +in the same danger as the horse eating oats, or as my two cows in the +pear orchard; and if some day a surgeon has to come and stick a knife +into you, it may be for the same reason. + +The old-fashioned diet standards are as follows: Swedish laborers at +hard work, over 4,700 calories; Russian workmen at moderate work, German +soldiers in active service, Italian laborers at moderate work, between +3,500 and 3,700 calories; English weavers, nearly 3,500 calories; +Austrian farm laborers, over 5,000 calories. Some twenty years ago the +United States government made observations of over 15,000 persons, and +established the following, known as the "Atwater standards": men at very +hard muscular work, 5,500 calories; men at moderately active muscular +work, 3,400 calories; men at light to moderate muscular work, 3,050 +calories; men at sedentary, or women at moderately active work, 2,700 +calories. + +In the last ten or fifteen years there has arisen a new school of +dietetic experts, headed by Professors Chittenden and Fisher of Yale +University. Professor Chittenden has published an elaborate book, "The +Nutrition of Man," in which he tells of long-continued experiment upon a +squad of soldiers and a group of athletes at Yale University, also upon +average students and professors. He has proved conclusively that all +these various groups have been able to maintain full body weight and +full working efficiency upon less than half the quantity of protein food +hitherto specified, and upon anywhere from one-half to two-thirds the +calory value set forth in the former standards. + +When I first read this book, I set to work to try its theories upon +myself. During the five or six months that I lived on raw food, I took +the trouble to weigh everything that I ate, and to keep a record. It is, +of course, very easy to weigh raw foods exactly, and I found that I +lived an active life and kept physical health upon slightly less than +2,500 calories a day. I have set this as my standard, and have +accustomed myself to follow it instinctively, and without wasting any +thought upon it. Sometimes I fall from grace; for I still crave the +delightful cakes and candies and ice cream upon which I was brought up. +I always pay the penalty, and know that I will not get back to my former +state of health until I skip a meal or two, and give my system a chance +to clean house. The average man will find the regimen set forth in this +book austere and awe-inspiring; I do not wish to pose as a paragon of +virtue, so perhaps I should quote a sarcastic girl cousin, who remarked +when I was a boy that the way to my heart was with a bag of +ginger-snaps. I live in the presence of candy stores and never think of +their existence, but if someone brings candy into the house and puts it +in front of me, I have to waste a lot of moral energy in letting it +alone. A few years ago I had a young man as secretary who discovered +this failing of mine, and used to afford himself immense glee by buying +a box of chocolates and leaving it on top of my desk. I would give him +back the box--with some of the chocolates missing--but he would persist +in "forgetting it" on my desk; he would hide and laugh hilariously +behind the door, until my wife discovered his nefarious doings, and +warned me of them. + +Professor Chittenden states quite simply the common sense procedure in +the matter of food quantity. Find out by practical experiment what is +the very least food upon which you can do your work without losing +weight. That is the correct quantity for you, and if you are eating +more, you certainly cannot be doing your body any good, and all the +evidence indicates that you are doing it harm. You need not have the +least fear in making this experiment that you will starve yourself. +Later on, in a chapter on fasting, I shall prove to you that you carry +around with you in your body sufficient reserve of food to keep you +alive for eighty or ninety days; and if you draw on a small quantity of +this you do not do yourself the slightest harm. Cut down the amount of +your food; eat the bulky foods, which contain less calory value, and +weigh yourself every day, and you will be surprised to discover how much +less you need to eat than you have been accustomed to. + +One of the things you will find out is that your stomach is easily +fooled; it is largely guided by bulk. If you eat a meal consisting of a +moderate quantity of lean meat, a very little bread, a heaping dish of +turnip greens, and a big slice of watermelon, you will feel fully +satisfied, yet you will not have taken in one-third the calory value +that you would at an ordinary meal with gravies and dressings and +dessert. The bulky kind of food is that for which your system was +adapted in the days when it was shaped by nature. You have a large +stomach, many times as large as you would have had if you had lived on +refined and concentrated foods such as butter, sugar, olive oil, cheese +and eggs. You have a long intestinal tract, adapted to slowly digesting +foods, and to the work of extracting nutrition from a mass of roughage. +You have a very large lower bowel, which Metchnikoff, the Russian +scientist, one of the greatest minds who ever examined the problems of +health, declares a survival, the relic of a previous stage of evolution, +and a source of much disease. The best thing you can do with that lower +bowel is to give it lots of hay, as it requires; in other words, to eat +the salads and greens which contain cellulose material. This contains no +food value, and does not ferment, but fills the lower bowel and +stimulates it to activity. + +If you eat too much food, three things may happen. First, it may not be +digested, and in that case it will fill your system with poisons. +Second, it may be assimilated, but not burned up by the body. In that +case it has to be thrown out by the kidneys or the sweat glands, and +this puts upon these organs an extra strain, to which in the long run +they may be unequal. Or third, the surplus material may be stored up as +fat. This is an old-time trick which nature invented to tide you over +the times when food was scarce. If you were a bear, you would naturally +want to eat all you could, and be as fat as possible in November, so +that you might be able to hunt your prey when you came out from your +winter's sleep in April. But you are not a bear, and you expect to eat +your regular meals all winter; you have established a system of +civilization which makes you certain of your food, and the place where +you keep your surplus is in the bank, or sewed up in the mattress, or +hidden in your stocking. In other words, a civilized man saves money, +and the habit of storing globules of grease in the cells of his body is +a survival of an old instinct, and a needless strain upon his health. +Not merely does the fat man have to carry all the extra weight around +with him, but his body has to keep it and tend it; and what are the +effects of this is fully shown by life insurance tables. People who are +five or ten per cent over weight have five or ten per cent more chance +of dying all the time, while people who are five or ten per cent under +weight have five or ten per cent more than the average of life +expectation. There is no answer to these figures, which are the result +of the tabulation of many hundreds of thousands of cases. The meaning of +them to the fat person is to put himself on a diet of lean meat, green +vegetables and fresh fruits, until he has brought himself down, not +merely to the normal fatness of the civilized man, but to the normal +leanness of the athlete, the soldier on campaign, and the student who +has more important things to think about than stuffing his stomach. + +There is, of course, a certain kind of leanness which is the result of +ill health. There are wasting diseases; tuberculosis, for example, and +anemia. There are people who worry themselves thin, and there are a few +rare "spiritual" people, so-called, who fade away from lack of +sufficient interest in their bodies. That is not the kind of leanness +that I mean, but the active, wiry leanness, which sometimes lives a +hundred years. Nearly always you will find that such people are spare +eaters; and you will find that our ideal of rosy plumpness, both for +adults and children, is a wholly false notion. We once had in our home +as servant an Irish girl, who was what is popularly called "a picture of +health," with those beautiful flaming cheeks that Irish and English +women so often have. She was in her early twenties, and nobody who knew +her had any idea but that her health was perfect. But one morning she +was discovered in bed with one side paralyzed, and in a couple of weeks +she was dead with erysipelas. The color in her cheeks had been nothing +but diseased blood vessels, overloaded with food material; and with the +blood in that condition, one of the tiny vessels in the brain had become +clogged. + +In the same way I have seen children, two or three years old, plump and +rosy, and considered to be everything that children should be; but +pneumonia would hit them, and in two or three days they would be at +death's door. I do not mean that children should be kept hungry; on the +contrary, they should have four or five meals a day, so that they do not +have a chance to become too hungry. But at those meals they should eat +in great part the bulky foods, which contain the natural salts needed +for building the body. If a child asks for food, you may give it an +apple, or you may give it a slice of bread and butter with sugar on it. +The child will be equally well content in either case; but it is for +you, with your knowledge of food values, to realize that the bread with +butter and sugar contains two or three times as much nutriment as the +apple, but contains practically none of the precious organic salts which +will make the child's bones and teeth. + +So far I have discussed this subject as if all foods grew on bushes +outside your kitchen door, and all you had to do was to go and pick off +what you wanted. But as a matter of fact, foods cost money, and under +our present system of wage slavery, the amount of money the average +person can spend for food is strictly limited. In a later book I am +going to discuss the problem of poverty, its causes and remedies. All +that I can do here is to tell you what foods you ought to have, and if +society does not pay you enough for your work to enable you to buy such +foods, you may know that society, is starving you, and you may get busy +to demand your rights as human beings. Meantime, however, such money as +you do have, you want to spend wisely, and the vast majority of you +spend it very unwisely indeed. + +In the first place, a great many of the simplest and most wholesome +foods are cheap--often because people do not know enough to value them. +We insist upon having the choice cuts of meats, because they are more +tender to the teeth, but the cheaper cuts are exactly as nutritious. We +insist upon having our meats loaded with fat, although fatness is an +abnormal condition in an animal, and excess of fat is a grave error in +diet. I live in a country where jack rabbits are a pest, and in the +market they sell for perhaps one-fourth the cost of beef, and yet I can +hardly ever get them, because people value them so little as food; they +prefer the meat of a hog which has been wallowing in a filthy pen, and +has been deliberately made so fat that it could hardly walk! + +I have already spoken of prunes, a much despised and invaluable food. +All the dried fruits are rich in food values, and if we could get them +untreated by chemicals, they would be worth their cost. I was brought up +to despise the cheaper vegetables, such as cabbage and turnips; I never +tasted boiled cabbage until I was forty, and then to my great surprise I +made the discovery that it is good. Raw cabbage is as valuable as any +other salad; it is a trifle harder to digest for some people, but I do +not believe in pampering the stomach. Both potatoes and rice are cheap +and wholesome, if only we would get unpolished rice, and if we would +leave the skins on the potatoes until after they are cooked. Nearly all +the mineral salts of the potato are just under the outer skin, and are +removed by the foolish habit of peeling them. + +The prices of food differ so widely at different seasons and in +different parts of the world, that there is not much profit in trying to +figure how cheaply a person can live. I have found that I spend for the +diet I have indicated here, from sixty to eighty cents a day. I do not +buy any fancy foods, but on the other hand, I do not especially try to +economize; I buy what I want of the simple everyday foods in their +season. Most everyone will find that it is a good business proposition +to buy the foods which he needs to keep in health. If the average +workingman would add up the money he spends, not merely in the +restaurants, but in the candy stores, the drug stores, the tobacco +stores, and the offices of doctors and dentists, he would find, I think, +that he could afford to buy himself the necessary quantity of wholesome +natural foods. For a family of three, in the place where I live, enough +of these foods can be purchased for a dollar a day, and this is about +one-fourth what common labor is being paid, and one-eighth of what +skilled labor is being paid. I will specify the foods: a pound and a +half of shoulder steak, a loaf of whole wheat bread or a box of shredded +wheat biscuit, a head of cabbage, a pound of prunes, and four or five +pounds of apples. + +There are many ways of saving in the purchase of food if you put your +mind upon it. If you are buying prunes, you may pay as high as fifty +cents or a dollar a pound for the big ones, and they are not a bit +better than the tiny ones, which you can buy for as low as eight cents a +pound in bulk. When bread is stale, the bakers sell it for half price, +despite the fact that only then has it become fit to eat. If you buy +canned peaches, you will pay a fancy price for them, and they will be +heavy with cane sugar; but if you inquire, you find what are known as +"pie peaches," put up in gallon tins without sugar, and at about half +the price. The butcher will sell you what he calls "hamburg steak" at a +very low price, and if you let him prepare it out of your sight, he will +fill it with fat and gristle; but let him make some while you watch, and +then you have a very good food. One of my diet rules is that I do not +trust the capitalist system to fix me up any kind of mixed or ground or +prepared foods. I have not eaten sausage since I saw it made in Chicago. + +Also there is something to know about the cooking of foods, since it is +possible to take perfectly good foods and spoil them by bad cooking. +Once upon a time our family discovered a fireless cooker, and thought +that was a wonderful invention for an absent-minded author and a wife +who is given to revising manuscripts. But recent investigations which +have been made into the nature of the "vitamines," food ferments which +are only partly understood, suggest that prolonged cooking of food may +be a great mistake. The starch has to be cooked in order to break the +cell walls by the expansion of the material inside. Twenty minutes will +be enough in the case of everything except beans, which need to be +cooked four or five hours. Meat should be eaten rare, except in the case +of pork, which harbors a parasite dangerous to the human body; therefore +pork should always be thoroughly cooked. The white of eggs is made less +digestible by boiling hard or frying. Eggs should never be allowed to +boil; put them on in cold water, and take them off as soon as the water +begins to boil. It is not necessary to cook either fresh fruit or dried. +The dried fruits may be soaked and eaten raw, but I find that several +fruits, especially apples and pears, do not agree with me well if they +are eaten raw, so I stew them for fifteen or twenty minutes. I have no +objection to canned fruits and vegetables, provided one takes the +trouble in opening them to make sure there is no sign of spoiling. If +you put up your own fruits, do not put in any sugar. All you have to do +is to let them boil for a few minutes, and to seal them tightly while +they are boiling hot. The whole secret of preserving is to exclude the +air with its bacteria. + +If you live on a farm, you will have no trouble in following the diet +here outlined, for you can produce for yourselves all the foods that I +have recommended; only do not make the mistake of shipping out your best +foods, and taking back the products of a factory, just because you have +read lying advertisements about them. Take your own wheat and oats and +corn to the mill, and have it ground whole, and make your own breads and +cereals. Try the experiment of mixing whole corn meal with water and a +little salt, and baking it into hard, crisp "corn dodgers." I do not eat +these--but only because I cannot buy them, and have no time to make +them. + +Another common article of food which I do not recommend is salted and +smoked meats. I do not pretend to know the effects of large quantities +of salt and saltpetre and wood smoke upon the human system, but I know +that Dr. Wiley's "poison squad" proved definitely that a number of these +inorganic minerals are injurious to health, and I prefer to take fresh +meat when I can get it. I use a moderate quantity of common salt on meat +and potatoes, because there seems to be a natural craving for this. I +know that many health enthusiasts insist that I am thus putting a strain +on my kidneys, but I will wait until these health enthusiasts make clear +to me why deer and cattle and horses in a wild state will travel many +miles to a salt-lick. I have learned that it is easy to make plausible +statements about health, but not so easy to prove them. For example, I +was told that it is injurious to drink water at meals, and for years I +religiously avoided the habit; but it occurred to some college professor +to find out if this was really true, and he carried on a series of +experiments which proved that the stomach works better when its contents +are diluted. The only point about drinking at meals is that you should +not use the liquid to wash down your food without chewing it. + +I can suggest two other ways by which you may save money on food. One is +by not eating too much, and another is by eating all that you buy. The +amount of food that is wasted by the people of America would feed the +people of any European nation. The amount of food that is thrown out +from any one of our big American leisure class hotels would feed the +children of a European town. I think it may fairly be described as a +crime to throw into the garbage pail food which might nourish human +life. In our family we have no garbage pail. What little waste there is, +we burn in the stove, and my wife turns it into roses. It consists of +the fat which we cannot help getting at the butcher's, and the bones of +meat, and the skins of some fruits and vegetables. It would never enter +into our minds to throw out a particle of bread, or meat, or other +wholesome food. If we have something that we fear may spoil, we do not +throw it out, but put it into a saucepan and cook it for a few minutes. +If you will make the same rule in your home, you will stop at least that +much of the waste of American life; and as to the big leisure class +hotels, and the banquet tables of the rich--just wait a few years, and I +think the social revolution will attend to them! + + + + +CHAPTER XXII + +FOODS AND POISONS + + (Concludes the subject of diet, and discusses the effect upon the + system of stimulants and narcotics.) + + +A few years ago there died an old gentleman who had devoted some twenty +years of his life to teaching people to chew their food. Horace Fletcher +was his name, and his ideas became a fad, and some people carried them +to comical extremes. But Fletcher made a real discovery; what he called +"the food filter." This is the automatic action of the swallowing +apparatus, whereby nature selects the food which has been sufficiently +prepared for digestion. If you chew a mouthful of food without ever +performing the act of swallowing, you will find that the food gradually +disappears. What happens is that all of it which has been reduced to a +thin paste will slip unnoticed down your throat, and you may go on +putting more food into your mouth, and chewing, and can eat a whole meal +without ever performing the act of swallowing. Fletcher claimed that +this is the proper way to eat, and that you can train yourself to follow +this method. I have tried his idea and adopted it. One of my diet rules, +to which there is no exception, is that if I haven't the time to chew my +food properly, I haven't the time to eat; I skip that meal. + +The habit of bolting food is a source of disease. To be sure, the +carnivorous animals bolt their food, but they are tougher than we are, +and do not carry the burden of a large brain and a complex nervous +system. If you swallow your meals half chewed, and wash them down with +liquids, you may get away with it for a while, but some day you will pay +for it with dyspepsia and nervous troubles. And the same thing applies +to your habit of jumping up from meals and rushing away to work, whether +it be work of the muscles, or of brain and nerves. Proper digestion +requires the presence of a quantity of blood in the walls of the stomach +and digestive tract. It requires the attention of your subconscious +mind, and this means rest of muscles and brain centers. If you cannot +rest for an hour after meals, omit that meal, or make it a light one, of +fruit juices, which are almost immediately absorbed by the stomach, and +of salads, which do not ferment. You may rest assured that it will not +hurt you to skip a meal, and make up for it when you have time to be +quiet. I have been many times in my life under very intense and long +continued nervous strain; for example, during the Colorado coal strike, +I led a public demonstration which kept me in a state of excitement all +the day and a good part of the night several weeks. During this period I +ate almost nothing; a baked apple and a cup of custard would be as near +as I would go to a meal, and as a result I came through the experience +without any injury whatever to my health. I lost perhaps ten pounds in +weight, but that was quickly made up when I settled back to a normal way +of life. + +I have been on camping trips when I had a great deal of hard work to do, +carrying a canoe long distances on my back, or paddling it forty miles a +day. On the mornings of such a trip I have seen a guide cook himself an +elaborate breakfast of freshly baked bread, bacon, and even beans, and +make a hearty meal and then go straight to work. My meal, on the +contrary, would consist of a small dish of stewed prunes, or perhaps +some huckleberries or raspberries, if they could be found. I will not +say that I could do as much as the guide, because he was used to it, and +I was not. But I can say this--if I had eaten his breakfast at the start +of the day, I would have been dead before night; and I mean the word +"dead" quite literally. I know a man who started to climb Whiteface +mountain in the Adirondacks. He climbed half way, and then ate lunch, +which consisted of nine hard boiled eggs. Then he started to climb the +rest of the mountain, and dropped dead of acute indigestion. + +There are few poisons which can affect the system more quickly, or more +dangerously, than a mass of food which is not digested. The stomach is +an ideal forcing-house for the breeding of bacteria. It provides warmth +and moisture, and you, in your meal, provide the bacteria and the +material upon which they thrive. Under normal conditions, the stomach +pours out a gastric juice which kills the bacteria; but let this gastric +juice for any reason be lacking--because your nervous energy has gone +somewhere else, or because your blood-stream, from which the gastric +juice must be made, has been drawn away to the muscles by hard labor; +then you have a yeast-pot, with great quantities of gases and poisons. +In acute cases the results are evident enough: violent pains and +convulsions, followed by coma and the turning black of the body. But +what you should understand is that you may produce a milder case of such +poisoning, and may do it day after day habitually, and little by little +your vital organs will be weakened by the strain. + +It does not make any difference at what hour of the twenty-four you take +the great bulk of your food. It is one of the commonest delusions that +you get some strengthening effect from your food immediately, and must +have this strength in order to do hard work. To be sure, there are +substances, such as grape-sugar, which require practically no digesting; +you can hold them in the mouth, and they will be digested by the saliva, +and absorbed at once into the blood-stream. But unless you have been +starved for a long period you do not need to get your strength in this +rush fashion. If you ate your normal meals on the previous day, your +blood-stream is fully supplied with nutriment which has been put through +a long process of preparation, and you can get up in the morning and +work all day, if necessary, upon what is already in your system. To be +sure, you may feel hungry, and even faint, but that is merely a matter +of habit; your system is accustomed to taking food and expects it. But +if you are a laborer doing hard work, you can easily train yourself to +eat a light meal in the morning, and another light meal at noon, and to +eat a hearty meal when your work is done and you can rest. Two light +meals and a hearty meal are all that any system needs, and you can prove +it to yourself by trying it, and watching your weight once a week. + +I have tried many experiments, and the conclusion to which I have come +is that there is no virtue in any particular meal-hours or any +particular number of meals. For several years I tried the experiment of +two meals a day. I was living a retired life, and had little contact +with the world, and I would make a hearty meal at ten o'clock in the +morning, and another at five in the afternoon. But later on I found that +inconvenient, and now I take a light breakfast, and two moderate-sized +meals at the conventional hours of lunch and dinner. I can arrange my +own time, so after meal times is when I get my reading done. Sometimes, +when I am tired, I feel sleepy after meals, but I have learned not to +yield to this impulse. I do not know how to explain this; I have +observed that animals sleep after eating, and it appears to be a natural +thing to do; but I know that if I go to sleep after a meal, nature makes +clear to me that I have made a mistake, and I do not repeat it. I never +eat at night, and always go to bed on an empty stomach, so I am always +hungry when I open my eyes in the morning. I never know what it is not +to be hungry at meal times, and my habits are so regular that I could +set my watch by my stomach. + +Another common habit which is harmful is eating between meals. I have +known people who are accustomed to nibble at food nearly all the time. +Shelley records that he tried it as an experiment, thinking it might be +a convenient way to get digestion done--but he found that it did not +work. The stomach is apparently meant to work in pulses; to do a job of +digesting, and then to rest and accumulate the juices for another job. +It will accustom itself to a certain régime, and will work accordingly, +but if, when it has half digested a load of food, you pile more food in +on top, you make as much trouble as you would make in your kitchen if +you required your cook to prepare another meal before she has cleaned up +after the last one. Three times a day is enough for any adult to eat. +Children require to eat oftener, because their bodies are more active, +and they not merely have to keep up weight, but to add to it. The +simplest way to arrange matters with children is to give them three good +meals at the hours when adults eat, and then to give them a couple of +pieces of fruit between breakfast and lunch, and again between lunch and +supper. I have never seen a child who would not be satisfied with this, +when once the habit was established. + +I have already spoken of the cooking and serving of food. I consider +that the "gastronomic art," as it is pompously called, is ninety-nine +per cent plain rubbish. To be sure, if foods are appetizingly prepared, +and look good and smell good and taste good, they will cause the gastric +juices to flow abundantly, as the Russian scientist Pavlov has +demonstrated by practical experiment with the stomach-pump. But I know +without any stomach-pump that the best thing to make my gastric juices +flow is hard work and a spare diet. When I come home from five sets of +tennis, and have a cold shower and a rub-down, my gastric juices will +flow for a piece of cold beefsteak and a cold sweet potato, quite as +well as for anything that is served by a leisure class "chef." Needless +to say, I want food to be fresh, and I want it to be clean, but I have +other things to do with my time and money than to pamper my appetites +and encourage food whims. + +If you have a grandmother, or ever had one, you know what grandmothers +tell you about "hot nourishing food"; but I have tried the experiment, +and satisfied myself that there is absolutely no difference in +nourishing qualities between hot food and cold food. If you chew your +food sufficiently, it will all be ninety-eight and six-tenths degree +food when it gets to your stomach, and that is the way your stomach +wants it. Of course, if you have been out in a blizzard, and are +chilled, and want to restore the body temperature, a hot drink will be +one of the quickest ways, and if the emergency is extreme, you may even +add a stimulant. On the other hand, if you are suffering from heat, it +is sensible to cool your body by a cold drink. But you should use as +much judgment with yourself as you would with a horse, which you do not +permit to drink a lot of cold water when he is heated up, and is going +into his stall to stand still. + +I have mentioned the word "stimulants," and this opens a large subject. +There are drugs which affect the body in two different ways: some excite +the nerves, and through the nerves the heart and blood-stream, to more +intense activity; others have the effect of deadening the nerves, and +dulling the sense of exhaustion and pain. One of these groups is called +stimulants, and the other is called narcotics; but as a matter of fact +the stimulants are really narcotics, because they operate by dulling the +nerves whose function it is to prevent the over-accumulation of fatigue +poisons; in other words, they keep the nerves and muscles from knowing +that they are tired, and so they go on working. + +It is possible, of course, to conceive of an emergency in which that is +necessary. Once upon a time, on a hunting trip, I had been traveling all +day, and was caught in a rain storm, and exhausted and chilled to the +bone; I had to make camp without a fire, so when I got the tent up I +wrapped myself in blankets and drank a couple of tablespoons full of +whiskey. That is the only time I have ever taken whiskey in my life, +and it warmed me almost instantly, and did me no harm. In the same way +there were two or three occasions when I was on the verge of a nervous +breakdown, and could not sleep, and let the doctor give me a sleeping +powder. But in each case I knew that I was fooling with a dangerous +habit, and I did no more fooling than necessary. No one should make use +of either stimulants or narcotics except in extreme emergency, and never +but a few times in a lifetime. What you should do is to change your +habits so that you will not need to over-strain. + +All these drugs are habit forming; that is to say, they leave the body +no better, and with a craving for a repetition of the relief. When you +are tired, it is because your muscles and nerves are storing up fatigue +poisons more rapidly than your blood-stream can get rid of them. You +need to know about this condition, and exhaustion and pain are nature's +protective warning. If you put a stop to the warning, you are as +unintelligent as the Eastern despots who used to cut off the head of the +messenger who brought bad tidings. If, when you have a headache, you go +into a drug store and let the druggist mix you one of those white fizzy +drinks, what you are doing is not to get rid of the poisons in your +blood-stream, but merely to reduce the action of your heart, so as to +keep the blood from pressing so fast into the aching blood vessels and +nerves. You may try that trick with your heart a number of times, but +sooner or later you will try it once too often--your heart will stop a +little bit quicker than you meant it to! + +Drugs are poisons, and their action depends upon their poisoning some +particular portion of the body, and temporarily paralyzing it. And bear +this in mind, they are none the less poisonous because they are +"natural" products. You can kill yourself by cyanide of potassium, which +comes out of a chemist's retort; but you can kill yourself just as dead +with laudanum, which comes out of a plant, or with the contents of the +venom sac of a snake. You are poisoning yourself none the less certainly +if you use alcohol, which is made from the juices of beautiful fruits, +and has had hosts of famous poets writing songs about it; or you can +poison yourself with the caffein which you get in a lovely brown bean +which comes from Brazil, fragrant to the nostrils and delicious to the +taste. You may drink wine and tea and coffee for a hundred years, and +have your picture published in the newspapers as a proof that these +habits conduce to health; but nothing will be said about the large +number of people who practiced these habits, and didn't live so long, +and about how long they might have lived if they hadn't practiced these +habits. + +I was brought up in the South, and my "elders" belonged to a generation +which had grown up in war time. For this reason many of the men both +drank and smoked to excess, and in my boyhood I lived among them and +watched them, and with the help of advice from a wise mother, I +conceived a horror of every kind of stimulant. The alcoholic poets could +not fool me; I had been in the alcoholic wards of the hospitals. I had +seen one man after another, beautiful and kindly and gracious men, +dragged down into a pit of torment and shame. + +Alcohol is, I think, the greatest trap that nature ever set for the feet +of the human race. It is responsible for more degradation and misery +than any other evil in the world; and I say this, knowing well that my +Socialist friends will cry, "What about Capitalism?" My answer is that I +doubt if there ever would have been any Capitalism in the world, if it +had not been for alcohol. If the workers had not been systematically +poisoned, and all their savings taken from them by the gin-mill, they +would never have submitted to the capitalist system, they would have +built the co-operative commonwealth at the time they were building the +first factories. I listen to the arguments of my radical friends about +"personal liberty," but I note that in Russia, when it was a question of +making a practical revolution and keeping it alive, the first thing the +leaders did was to drag out the contents of the wine-cellars of the +palaces, and smash them in the gutters. + +Tea and coffee are, of course, much milder in their effects than +alcohol; you can play with them longer, and the punishment will be less +severe. But if you make habitual use of them, you will pay the penalty +which all drugs exact from the system. Your brain and your nerve centers +will be less sensitive, less capable of working except under the +influence of drugs; their reacting power will be dulled, and they will +wear out more quickly. I have watched the slaves of the "morning cup of +coffee," and know how they suffer when they do not get it. Likewise, I +have watched the tea drinkers. It is comical to live in England, and see +all the able-bodied men obliged to leave their work at four o'clock in +the afternoon, and seek the regular stimulus for their tired nerves. If +you are to meet anybody, it is always for "tea" that the ceremony is +set, and if you refuse to drink tea, your hostess will be uncomfortable, +unable to talk about anything but the strange, incredible notion that +one can live without tea. I discovered after a while the solution of +this problem; I would say that I preferred a little hot water, if you +please, and so my hostess would pour me a cup of hot water, and I would +sit and gravely sip it, and everybody would be perfectly content: I was +conforming to the outward appearance of normality, which is what the +British conventions require. + +I have never drunk a cup of coffee, so I do not know what its effect on +me would be. But some fifteen years ago I drank a glass of very weak +iced tea at eight o'clock in the evening, and did not get to sleep until +four or five the next morning. So I know that there is really a drug in +tea. I know also that I might accustom my system to it, just as I might +learn to poison my lungs with nicotine without being made immediately +and suddenly ill; but why should I wish to do this? Life is so +interesting to me that I do not need to stimulate my brain centers in +order to appreciate the thrill of it. And when I am tired, I can rest +myself by listening to music, or by reading a worth-while novel--things +which I have found do not leave the after effects of nicotine. + +I remember the first time I met Jack London. Our meeting consisted in +good part of his "kidding" me, because I was lacking in the congenial +vices of the café. He told me how much I had missed, because I had never +been drunk; One ought to try the great adventure, at least once! Poor +Jack is gone, because his kidneys gave out at forty; and nothing could +seem more ungracious than to point out that I am still alive, and +finding life enjoyable. Yet, in this book we are trying to find out how +to live, and if there are habits which wreck and destroy a magnificent +physique, and bring a great genius to death at the age of forty--surely +the rest of us want to know about it, and to be warned in time. I +mention Jack London in this connection, because he has said the last +word on the subject of alcohol. Read "John Barleycorn," and especially +read between the lines of it, and you will not need my argument to +persuade you to be glad that the Eighteenth Amendment has been written +into the Constitution, and that it is your duty as a Socialist, not +merely to obey it, but to vote for its enforcement. + +I am proceeding on the assumption that your life is of importance to +you; that you have a job to do which you know to be worth while, and to +which you desire to apply your powers. You agree with me that the +workers of the world are suffering, and that it is necessary for them to +find their freedom, and that this takes hard work and hard thinking. You +may say that I exaggerate the amount of harm that is done to the system +by tea and coffee, alcohol and tobacco. Well, let us assume that in +moderate quantities they do no harm at all: even so, I have the right to +ask you to show that they do some good; otherwise, surely, it is a +mistake for the workers to spend their savings upon them. + +Consider, for example, the amount of money which the wage slaves of the +world spend upon tobacco. Suppose they could be persuaded for two or +three years to spend this amount upon good reading matter--do you not +think there would be an improvement in their condition? Surely you +cannot maintain that the use of tobacco is necessary to the activities +of the brain! Surely you do not think that a man has to have a cigarette +in order to stimulate his thoughts, or to smoke a pipe to rest himself +after his work is done! I offer myself as evidence in such a +controversy; I have written as many books as any man in the radical +movement, and the sum total of my lifetime smoking amounts to one-half +of one cigarette. I tried that when I was eight years old, and somebody +told me a policeman would arrest me if he caught me, and I threw away +the cigarette, and ran and hid in an alley, and have not yet got over my +scare. + +In the "Journal for Industrial Hygiene" for October, 1920, is an article +entitled "Fatigue and Efficiency of Smokers in a Strenuous Mental +Occupation." Experiments were conducted among telegraph operators, and +the result showed that "the heavy smokers of the group show a higher +output rate at the beginning of the day than the light smokers, but +their rate falls off more markedly in the late hours, and their +production for the whole day is definitely less than that of the light +smokers. The heavy smokers also show less ability than the light smokers +to respond to increasing pressure of work in the late hours of the day +by handling their full share of the work presented." + +One point upon which every medical authority agrees is--that the use of +nicotine is of deadly effect upon the immature organism. Half-grown +youths who smoke cigarettes will never be full-sized men; they will +never have normal lungs or a normal heart. And likewise, all authorities +agree about the effect of smoking upon the organism of women. I gave +what little help I could to the task of helping to set women free, and +to make them the equals of men; but I was always pained when I +discovered that some of my feminist friends understood by woman's +emancipation no more than her right to adopt men's vices. I would say to +these ardent young female radicals, who cultivate the art of dangling a +cigarette from their lower lip, and sip cocktails out of coffee-cups in +Greenwich Village cafés, that they will never be able to bear sound +children; but I know that this would not interest them--they don't want +to bear any children at all. So I say that they will never be able to +think straight thoughts, and will be nervous invalids when they are +thirty. + +We went to war to make the world safe for democracy, and we put several +millions of our young men into armies, and if there were any of them who +did not already know how to smoke cigarettes, they learned it under +official sanction. So now we have a national tobacco bill that runs up +to two billions, and will insure us a new generation of "Class C" +rating. Speaking to the young radicals who are reading my books, I say: +We want to make the world over, to make it a place of freedom and +kindness, instead of the hell of greed and hate that it is today. For +that purpose we need a new moral code, and we can never win our victory +without it. I have attended radical conventions, sitting in unventilated +halls amid clouds of tobacco smoke, and listening to men wrangle all +through the day and a great part of the night; I have watched the fatal +dissensions in the movement, the quarrelings of the right wingers and +the left wingers and all stages and degrees in between, and I have +wondered--not jestingly, but in pitying earnest--how much of all those +personalities and factional misunderstanding had their origin in carbon +dioxide and nicotine. There is no use suggesting such ideas to the older +men, whose habits are fixed; but a new generation is coming on, with a +new vision of the enormous task before it; and is it too much to expect +of these young men and women, that they shall realize in advance the +grim tasks they have to do, and shall learn to run the machine of their +body so as to get out of it the maximum amount of service? Is it too +much to hope for, that some day we shall have a race of young fighters +for truth and justice, who are willing to live abstemious lives, and +consecrate themselves to the task of delivering mankind from wage +slavery and war? + + + + +CHAPTER XXIII + +MORE ABOUT HEALTH + + (Discusses the subjects of breathing and ventilation, clothing, + bathing and sleep.) + + +In discussing the question of health, we have given the greater part of +the space to the subject of diet, for the reason that experience has +convinced us that diet is two-thirds of health, and that nearly always +in disease you find errors of diet playing a part. There are, however, +other important factors of health, now to be discussed. + +Everything of which the body makes use is taken in the form of food and +drink, with the exception of one substance, the oxygen we get out of the +air. Every time we draw a breath we take in a certain amount of oxygen, +and every time we expel a breath, we drive out a certain amount of a gas +called carbon dioxide, which is what the body makes of the fuel it +burns. The body can get along for several days without water, and for +two or three months without food, but it can only get along for two or +three minutes without oxygen. It should be obvious that when the body +expels carbon dioxide, with a slight mixture of other more poisonous +gases, and sucks back what it expects will be a fresh supply of oxygen, +it wants to get oxygen, and not the same gases it has just expelled, nor +gases which have been expelled from the lungs of other people. + +In the days when primitive man lived outdoors, he did not have to think +about this problem. When he breathed poison from his lungs, the moving +air of nature blew it away, and the infinite vegetation of nature took +the carbon dioxide and turned it back into oxygen. And even when man +built himself shelters, he was not cunning enough to make them +air-tight; he had to leave a big hole for the smoke to get out, and +smaller holes through which to get light. But now our wonderful +civilization has solved these problems; we make our walls of air-tight +plaster, and we have invented a substance which will admit light without +admitting air. So we have the "white plague" of tuberculosis, and so we +have innumerable minor plagues of coughs and colds and sore throats. + +In the summer time the solution of the problem is easy. Have as many +doors and windows in your home as possible, and keep them open, and have +nothing in your home to make dust or to retain dust. But then comes +stormy and cold weather, and you have to close your doors and windows, +and keep your home at a higher temperature than the air outside. How +shall you do this, and at the same time get a continual supply of fresh +air? + +I will take the various methods of heating one by one. The problem in +each case is simple and can be made clear in a sentence or two. + +First, the open fireplace. This is a perfect solution, if you have +enough fuel, and do not have to worry about the waste of heat. An open +fireplace draws out all the air in the room in a short time, and you do +not have to bother about opening doors or windows; you may be sure that +the air is getting in through some cracks, or else the fire would not +burn. + +Second, a wood or coal or gas stove in the room, provided with a proper +vent, so that all the gases of combustion are drawn up the chimney. This +changes the air more slowly than an open fireplace, but it does the work +fairly well. All that you have to be careful about is that your vent is +sufficiently large and is working properly. If your fire does not +"draw," you will have smoke or coal-gas in the house, and this is bad +for the lungs; but worse for the lungs is a gas that you can neither see +nor smell nor taste, the deadly carbon monoxide. This gas is produced by +incomplete combustion, and whenever you see yellow flames from gas or +coal, you are apt to have this poisonous substance. Small quantities of +it are sufficient to cause violent headaches, and repeated doses of it +are fatal. Men who work in garages which are not properly ventilated run +this risk all the time, because carbon monoxide is one of the products +of imperfect combustion in the gas engine. + +Next, the furnace. A furnace sends fresh warm air into your house; the +only trouble is that it takes out all the moisture, and some authorities +say that this is bad for the lungs and throat. I do not know whether +this is true, but all furnaces are supposed to have a water chamber to +supply moisture to the air, and you should keep a pan of water on every +stove or radiator in your house. + +Next, steam heat, which includes hot-water heating. This is one of the +abominations of our civilization, and one of the methods by which our +race is committing suicide. There is nothing wrong about steam heat in +itself; the room is warmed in a harmless way; but the trouble is it +stays warm only so long as the doors and windows are kept shut. You are +in an air-tight box, and can be warm provided you do not mind being +suffocated. The moment you open a door or window, you have a cold draft +on your feet, and if you wish to change the air entirely you have to let +out all the heat; so, of course, you never do change it entirely, but go +on breathing the same air over and over, and every time you breathe it +the condition of your body is a little more reduced. + +The solution of this problem is not to heat the air in the room, but to +use your steam coils to heat fresh air, and then drive this air, already +warmed, into the room, at the same time providing a vent through which +the old air can be pushed out. This is the hot air system of heating, +and it requires some kind of engine or dynamo, and therefore is +expensive. It has been installed in a few office buildings and theaters. +One of the most perfect systems I ever inspected is in the building of +the New York Stock Exchange, where the air is warmed in winter, and +cooled in summer, and freed from dust, and exactly the right quantity is +supplied. It is a humorous commentary upon our civilization that we take +perfect care of the breathing apparatus of our stock-gamblers, but pay +no attention to the breathing apparatus of our senators and congressmen, +whose one business in life is to use their lungs. The stately old +building with its white marble domes looks impressive in moving pictures +and on illustrated postcards, but it has no system of ventilation +whatever, and is a death-trap to the poor wretches who are compelled to +spend their days, and sometimes their nights, within its walls. This +contrast is one symptom of the rise of industrial capitalism and the +collapse of political democracy. + +We have reserved to the last a method of heating which is the worst, and +can only be described as a crime against health: the use of gas and oil +stoves set out in the middle of the room, without a vent, and +discharging their fumes into the room. These stoves are simply +instruments of slow death, and their manufacture should be prohibited +by law. In the meantime, what you have to do is to refuse to live in a +room or to work in an office where such stoves are used. I have heard +dealers insist that this or the other kind of gas or oil stove was so +contrived as to consume all the fumes. Do not let anybody fool you with +such nonsense. There has never been any form of combustion devised which +consumes all the fumes. No such thing can be, because the products of +combustion are not combustible. The so-called "wickless blue flame" +stoves do burn all the oil, and a properly regulated gas stove will burn +all the gas, but that simply means that it turns the oil and gas into +carbon dioxide, the very substance which your lungs are working day and +night to get out of your body. + +Moreover, there is no oil or gas stove which ever burns perfectly all +the time, either because there is too much gas or insufficient air. Oil +and gas stoves sometimes give a partly yellow flame. You can cause them +to give a yellow flame at any time by blowing air against them, and that +yellow flame means imperfect combustion, and a probability of the deadly +carbon monoxide. These facts are known to every chemist and to every +student of hygiene, and the fact that civilized people continue to burn +such oil and gas stoves in their homes and offices is simply one more +proof that our civilization values human welfare and health at nothing +whatever in comparison with profits. + +Not merely should you see that you have a continuous supply of fresh air +in your home, but you should try to keep down dust in your home, and +especially fine particles of lint. Once upon a time our ancestors were +unable to make houses and floors tight, and so they put rugs on the +floors and hung tapestries on the walls to keep out the wind. We +civilized people are able to make both floors and walls absolutely +tight, and yet we continue to use rugs and curtains, it being the first +principle of our education that propriety requires us to continue to do +the things which our ancestors did. I am unable to think of a more silly +or stupid thing in the world than a rug or a curtain, but I have lived +in the house with them all my life, because, alas, the ladies cannot be +happy otherwise. They want their homes to be "pretty," and so they +continue to set dust traps, and to set themselves futile jobs of house +cleaning and shopping. + +Not all of us are able to be out of doors as much as we ought to be, but +all of us spend seven or eight hours out of every twenty-four in sleep, +and this time at least we ought to spend out of doors. I understand that +this is futile advice to give to the very poor. I was poor myself for +many years, and had to put all my clothes on at night in order to keep +warm, and even then I could not always do it. Nevertheless, from the +time I first realized the importance of ventilation I never slept in a +room with a closed window. + +I say, sleep outdoors if you possibly can. You do not have to be afraid +of exposure, for cold will not hurt you if you keep your body in proper +condition. I have slept out in a rubber blanket, with the rain beating +on my head and face; I have spread a rubber blanket on a hummock in the +midst of a swamp, and waked up in the morning with my hair and face +soaked in cold, white fog, but I never caught cold from such things; +there is no harm whatever in dampness or in "night air," if you are in +proper condition. Of course, you may get your ears frostbitten in the +middle of winter, but you can have a sleeping hood to remove that +danger. + +The "nature cure" enthusiasts, who lay so much stress upon an outdoor +life, also insist that the wearing of clothes is a harmful civilized +custom. They urge us to take "sun baths" and to "ventilate the skin." +Now, as a matter of fact, the skin does not breathe, it merely gives out +moisture, and it does not give out any less because we have clothing on +us, provided the clothing is dry and clean, and will absorb moisture. +But bye and bye the clothing becomes loaded with the waste substances +given out by the skin, and then it will absorb no more, and if you do +not change your clothing, no doubt it may have some effect upon health. + +But the principal evil of civilized clothing is that it binds the body +and prevents the free play of the muscles, and, more important yet, +stops the free circulation of the blood. I have already discussed hats, +which are the principal cause of baldness. I will go to the other +extremity of the body, and mention tight shoes, which, strange as it may +seem, cause headaches and colds. You will be able to find a few +civilized men with normal feet, but you will hardly ever find a woman +whose toes are not crowded together and misshapen. I have said that the +human body is one organism, and that it is fed and its health +maintained by the blood-stream; I say now that the circulation of the +blood is one thing, and if you block it at any one place, you block it +everywhere. Of course, not all the blood-stream goes down into the feet, +but some of it does, and if it is clogged in the feet, and the blood +vessels cramped and crowded, there is a certain amount of poison kept in +the system, which the system should have got rid of. + +Why do women wear tight shoes? Because the leisure class members of +their sex have been kept in harems and used as the playthings of men. To +be fragile and delicate was the thing admired by the masters of wealth, +and to have small hands and feet was a sign that women belonged to this +parasite class. Therefore at all hazards women's feet must be kept +small, even at the expense of their health and happiness; and so they +put themselves up on several inches of heels, which cause them to toddle +around like marionettes on a stage, with all their toes crowded down +into a lump. + +Why do men wear tight bands around their scalps, which cause their hair +to drop out, and tight, stiff columns around their necks, which stop the +circulation of the blood into their heads, and cause them to have +headaches instead of ideas? The reason is that for ages the rulers of +the tribe have wished to demonstrate publicly their superiority to the +common herd, which does the menial tasks. In England all gentlemen wear +tall black silk band-boxes on their heads, and in America they have a +choice among several varieties of round tight boxes. All men who work in +offices wear stiffly starched collars and cuffs, as a means of +demonstrating their superiority to the common workers, who have to sweat +at their necks. I think it is not too much to hope that when class +exploitation is done away with, we shall also get rid of these class +symbols, and choose our clothing because it is warm and comfortable, and +not according to the perverted imbecilities of "style." + +The skin gives out perspiration which is greasy; also the skin is +constantly growing, putting out layers of cells which dry up and are +worn off. We need to bathe with soap to remove the grease, and we need +to rub with a towel to brush away the dead cells of the skin, so that +the pores may be kept open. No one is taking care of his body who does +not wash and rub it once every twenty-four hours, and once or twice a +week with warm water and soap. It is often stated that hot baths are +weakening, but I have never found it so; however, I think it is a bad +practice to pamper the body, which should be accustomed to the shock of +cold water. The rule as to bathing, both as to temperature and time, is +simple. If, after the bath and rub-down, your body has reacted and you +feel vigorous and fresh, that bath has done you good. If, on the other +hand, you feel chilled and depressed, then you have been too long in the +water, or its temperature was too low. Every person has to find his own +rules in such matters. The only general rule is that as one grows older +the body reacts less quickly. + +All day, as we work and think, we store up more poisons in our cells +than the body can get rid of, and the time comes when the cells are so +loaded with poisons that we have to stop for a while, and let our +blood-stream clean house. The quantity of sleep one needs is a problem +like that of cold water; each person has to find his own rule. In +general, one needs less and less sleep as one grows older. Infants sleep +the greater part of the time; growing children should sleep ten or +eleven hours, adults seven or eight, and old people, unless they have +let themselves get fat, generally do not want to sleep more than six, +and part of this in short naps. When you sleep, your bodily energies +relax, and you make less heat, therefore you need extra clothing; but +this clothing should never cover the mouth and nose, nor should it be so +heavy as to make breathing a burden. If you are in good condition, it +will do you no harm to be chilly when you sleep, except that you do not +sleep so soundly. Sleeping too much is just as harmful as sleeping too +little. Nature will tell you that. The important thing, as in all other +problems of health, is to have something interesting to think about, +some exciting work to do in the world, and then you will sleep as little +as you have too. + + + + +CHAPTER XXIV + +WORK AND PLAY + + (Deals with the question of exercise, both for the idle and the + overworked.) + + +In discussing the important question of exercise, there is one +fundamental fact to begin with: that our present civilization divides +men sharply into two classes, those who do not get enough exercise, and +those who get too much. Obviously it would be folly to make the same +recommendations to the two classes. + +I begin with those who get too much exercise. They include a great +number, probably the majority of those who do the manual work of the +world. They include the farmers and the farm-hands, who work from dawn +to sunset, and sometimes by lantern light. They include also the +farmers' wives, the kitchen slaves of whom the old couplet tells: + + "Man's work ends from sun to sun, + But woman's work is never done." + +I am aware that men have worked that way for countless ages, and yet the +race is still surviving; but I am aware also that men wither up with +rheumatism, and contract chronic diseases of the kidneys and the blood +vessels, consequent upon the creation of greater quantities of fatigue +poisons than the body can regularly eliminate. + +I have very little interest in the past, and none whatever in finding +fault with it. My purpose is to criticize the present for the benefit of +the future, and therefore I say that modern machinery and the whole +development of modern large-scale production make it absolutely +unnecessary that women should slave all their waking hours in kitchens, +or that men should slave all day. I say it is monstrous folly that men +should work for twelve-hour stretches in steel mills, and for ten and +eleven hours in factories and mines. Organized labor has adopted the +slogan, "Eight hours for work, eight hours for sleep, eight hours for +play"; but my slogan is "Four hours for work, four hours for study, +eight hours for sleep, and eight hours for play." + +I know, and am prepared to demonstrate to any thinking man, that modern +civilization can produce, not merely all the necessities, but all the +comforts of life for every man, woman and child in the community, by the +expenditure of four hours a day work of the adult, able-bodied men and +women. So to all the wage slaves of the factories and mines, the fields +and the kitchens, I say that too much exercise is what is the matter +with you, and what you need is to get off in a quiet nook in the woods +and read a good novel, not merely for a few hours, but for a few months, +until you get over the effects of capitalist civilization. I know that +not many of you can get away as yet, but I urge you to insist upon +getting away, to fight for the chance to get away; and I will here +suggest a few of the novels for you to read when finally you do get +away. I choose the easy ones, which the dullest and most tired of you +will love; I say, make up your mind to read these thirty-two books +before you die, and do not let the world cheat you out of your chance! + +Mark Twain: A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Charles D. +Stewart: The Fugitive Blacksmith. W. Clark Russell: The Wreck of the +Grosvenor. R. L. Stevenson: Treasure Island, Kidnapped. Jack London: The +Sea Wolf, The Call of the Wild, Martin Eden. Joseph Conrad: Youth. H. G. +Wells: The War of the Worlds, When the Sleeper Wakes, The Sea Lady, The +History of Mr. Polly, The Food of the Gods, The Island of Dr. Moreau. +Upton Sinclair: The Jungle, King Coal, Jimmie Higgins, 100 Per Cent. +Theodore Dreiser: Sister Carrie. George Moore: Esther Waters. Frank +Norris: The Octopus. Brand Whitlock: The Turn of the Balance. De Foe: +Robinson Crusoe. Fielding: Tom Jones, Jonathan Wild the Great. +Thackeray: The Adventures of Barry Lyndon. Marmaduke Pickthall: The +Adventures of Hadji Baba. Blasco Ibanez: The Fruit of the Vine. Frank +Harris: Montes the Matador. Frederik van Eeden: The Quest. Tolstoi: +Resurrection. + +And now for the people who do not get enough exercise. In the armies of +King Cyrus it was the law that every man was required to sweat once +every twenty-four hours, and that is still the law for every business +man and office-worker and writer of books. There is no substitute for +it, and there is no health without it. I have heard Dr. Kellogg say that +the modern woman sends out her health with her washing, and I have +heard the leisure class ladies at the Sanitarium discuss this cryptic +utterance and wonder what he meant by it. I know that there is use +telling leisure class ladies what exercise at the wash-tub would do for +their abdomens and backs. I will only tell them that unless they can +find some kind of vigorous activity which keeps them in a free +perspiration for an hour or two each day, they will never be really +well, and will never bear children without agony and abortion. + +For myself, I have found that the minimum is three or four times a week. +Unless I get that much hard exercise I am soon in trouble. So my advice +to the business man is to take off his coat and collar and turn out and +help his truck-man; my advice to the white collar slave is to get a +part-time job, and dig ditches the rest of the time. To the man who has +cares which pursue him, and likewise to the ardent student and +brain-worker, I say that they should find, not merely exercise, but +play. The distinction between the two things is important. There can be +play that is not exercise, for example cards and chess; and, of course, +there can be exercise that is not play. What you must have is something +that is both play and exercise; something that not merely causes your +heart to beat fast, and your lungs to pump fast, and your sweat glands +to throw out poisons from your body, but something that fully occupies +your mind and gives your higher brain centers a chance to relax. + +Our civilization has very largely destroyed the possibility of play and +the spirit of play. We civilized people no longer know what play is, and +regard the desire to play as something abnormal--a form of vice. We +allow children to play after school hours, and on Saturdays; but for +grown-up, serious-minded men and women to want to play would be almost +as disreputable as for them to want to get drunk. What could foe more +pitiful than the spectacle of tens of thousands of men crowding into our +baseball parks and amusement fields to watch other men play for them! +Imagine, if you can, a crowd of people gathering in a restaurant or +theater to watch other people _eat_ for them! Imagine yourself a man +from Mars, coming down to a world with so many people in want, and +finding whole classes of men forbidden to do any work, under penalty of +disgrace, and compelled, in order to exercise their muscles, to pull on +rubber straps and lift weights and wave dumb-bells and Indian clubs in +the air--methods of expending their muscular energy which are +respectable because they accomplish nothing! + +When I was a boy, I was fond of all kinds of games. I was a good tennis +player, and in the country an incessant hunter and fisherman. When on +the city streets we boys could not find any other game to play, we would +get up on the roofs of the houses and throw clothes-pins and snow-balls +at the "Dagoes" working in the nearby excavations; so we had the fine +game of being chased by the "Dagoes," with the chance, real or +imaginary, of having a knife stuck into us. But then, as I grew older, +and became aware of the pain and misery of the world, I lost my interest +in games, and for ten years or so I never played; I did nothing but +study and write. So my health gave way, and I had the problem of +restoring it, and I spent some twenty years wrestling with this problem, +before I thoroughly convinced myself on the point that there can be no +such thing as sound and permanent health without a certain amount of +play. + +I don't think there is any kind of hard physical work I failed to try, +in the course of my experiments. I rode horseback, and took long walks, +and climbed mountains, and swam, and dug gardens, and chopped down whole +groves of trees and cut them up and carried them to the fireplace. I +have done this latter work for a whole winter in the country, several +hours every day, and it has done my health no good to speak of; I have +been ready for a breakdown at the end of it. The reason is that all the +time I was doing these things with my body, I was going right on working +my brain. While I was swimming or climbing a mountain or galloping on +horseback, I was absorbed in the next chapter of the book I was writing, +so that I literally did not know where I was. I would make up my mind +that I would not think about my work, and would make desperate efforts +not to do so; but it was like walking along the edge of a slippery +ditch--sooner or later I was bound to fall in, and go floundering along, +unable to get out again! + +And the same thing applies to all gymnastic work. I have experimented +with a dozen different systems of exercises, and with all kinds of water +treatments; I have used dumb-bells and Indian clubs and Swedish +gymnastics, MacFadden's exercises in bed, and the Yogi breathing +exercises, and more kinds of queer things than I can remember now; but +for me there is only one solution of the problem, which is to have an +antagonist. It may be a deer I am trying to shoot, or some trout I am +trying to lure out of their holes; it may be some boys I am trying to +beat at football or hockey, or it may be the game I know best and find +most convenient, which is tennis. If it is tennis, then it has to be +someone who can make me work as hard as I know how; for if it is someone +I can beat easily, why, before I have been playing ten minutes, I am +busily working out the next chapter of a book, or answering letters I +have just got in the mail. + +Recently I came upon a book, "The Psychology of Relaxation," by Dr. +Patrick, in which the theory of this is set forth. Civilized man is +working his higher brain centers more than his body can stand; his brain +is running away with him, absorbing a constantly increasing share of his +energies. True relaxation is only possible where the higher brain +centers are lulled, and the back lobes of the brain brought into +activity. One of the means of doing this is alcohol, and that is why +through the ages all races of men have craved to get drunk. There is a +method which is harmless, and does not break down the system, and that +is play. When we become really interested in play, we are as children, +or as primitive man; we do all the things that our race used to do many +ages ago; we hunt and fight, we pit our wits against the wits of our +enemies, and struggle with desperation to get the better of them. If our +play is physical play, if we are absorbed in a game or bodily contest, +then we are exerting and developing all those portions of us which +civilization tends to atrophy and deaden. + +There are people who will dispute with you about Socialism, and ask, how +we are going to provide incentives if we do away with wage slavery. When +you tell them that activity is natural to human beings, and that if +there were no work, men and women would have to make some, they shake +their heads mournfully and tell you about the problem of "human nature." +But consider games and sports: men do not have to work their bodies, yet +they go out and deliberately hunt for trouble! They invent themselves +subtle and complicated games, and are not content until they find people +who can beat them at it, or at any rate can make them work to the limit +of their strength, until they are in a dripping perspiration and +thoroughly exhausted! I may be too optimistic about "human nature," but +I believe that this is the attitude every normal human being takes +toward the powers, both mental and physical, which he possesses; he +wants to use them, and for all they are worth. If you don't believe it, +just take any group of youngsters, give them a baseball and bat, turn +them loose in a vacant lot, and watch them "choose up sides" and fall to +work, screaming and shouting in wild excitement! There are some races of +the earth which do not yet know baseball, but the Filipinos and the +Japanese have learned it, and even the war-worn "Poilus" and the +supercilious "Tommies" condescended to experiment with it. And if you +think it is only physical competition that young human animals enjoy, +try them at putting on a play, or printing a magazine, or conducting a +debate, or building a house--anything whatever that involves healthy +competition, and is related to the big things of life, but without being +for the profit of some exploiter! Get clear the plain and simple +distinction between work and play: play is what you want to do, while +work is what the profit system makes you do! + + + + +CHAPTER XXV + +THE FASTING CURE + + (Deals with nature's own remedy for disease, and how to make use of + it.) + + +We have next to consider the various human ailments, what causes them, +and how they can be remedied. As it happens, I know of a cure that comes +pretty near being that impossible thing, a "cure-all." At any rate, it +is so far ahead of all other cures, that a discussion of it will cover +three-fourths of the subject. + +When I was a boy living in New York, there was a man by the name of Dr. +Tanner, who took a forty-day fast. He was on public exhibition at the +time, and was supposed to be watched day and night; the newspapers gave +a great deal of attention to the story, and crowds used to come to gaze +at him. I remember very well the conversations I heard about the matter. +People were quite sure that it couldn't be true. The man must be getting +something to eat on the sly; he must have some nourishment in the water +he drank; no human being could fast more than five or six days without +starving to death. + +In the year 1910 I published in the United States and England a magazine +article telling how on several occasions I had fasted ten or twelve +days, and what I had accomplished by it. I found that I had the same +difficulty to confront as old Dr. Tanner; I received scores of letters +from people who called me a "faker," and I read scores of newspaper +editorials to the same effect. The New York Times published a dispatch +about three young ladies on Long Island who were trying a three-day +fast, and the Times commented editorially to the effect that these young +ladies were "the victims of a shallow and unscrupulous sensationalist." + +The notion that human beings can perish for lack of food in a few days +is deeply rooted in people's minds. Recently a group of eleven Irishmen +in jail set to work to starve themselves to death, as a protest against +British rule in their country. Day after day the newspapers reported the +news from Cork prison, and at about the twentieth day they began to +state that the prisoners were dying, that the priest had been sent for, +that their relatives were gathered on the prison steps. Day after day +such reports continued, through the thirties, and the forties, and the +fifties, and the sixties, and the seventies. One man died on the +eighty-eighth day, and MacSwiney died on the seventy-fourth. The other +nine gave up after ninety-four days and were all restored to health. I +watched carefully the newspaper and magazine comment on this incident, +yet I did not see a single remark on the medical aspects of it; I could +not discover that scientific men had learned anything whatever about the +ability of the body to go without food for long periods. + +Get this clear at the outset: Nobody ever "starved to death" in less +than two months, and it is possible for a fat person to go without food +for as long as three or four months. People who "starve to death" in +shorter times do not die of starvation, but of fright. The first time I +fasted happened to be at the time of the Messina earthquake. I was +walking about, perfectly serene and happy, having been without food for +three days, and I read in my newspaper how the rescue ships had reached +Messina, and found the population ravenous, in the agonies of +starvation, some of the people having been without food for seventy-two +hours! (It sounds so much worse, you see, when you state it in hours.) + +The second point to get clear is that the fast is a physiological +process; that is to say, it is something which nature understands and +carries through in her own serene and efficient way. When you take a +fast, you are not carrying out a freak notion of your own, or of mine; +you are discovering a lost instinct. Every cat and dog knows enough not +to take food when it is ill; it is only in hospitals conducted by modern +medical science that the custom prevails of serving elaborate "trays" to +invalids. I remember a story about a man who made himself a reputation +and a fortune by curing the pet dogs of the rich. These beautiful little +creatures, which sleep between silken covers, and have several servants +to wait upon them, and are fed from gold and silver dishes upon rich and +elaborately cooked foods, fall victim to as many diseases as their +mistresses, and they would be brought to this specialist, who conducted +his dog hospital in an old brickyard. In each one of the compartments of +the brick kiln he would shut up a dog with a supply of fresh water, a +crust of stale bread, a piece of bacon rind, and the sole of an old +shoe; and after a few days he would go back and find that the dog had +eaten the crust of bread, and then he would write to the owner that the +dog was on the high road to recovery. He would go back a few days later +and find that the dog had eaten the piece of bacon rind, and then he +would write that the dog was very nearly cured. He would wait until the +dog had eaten the piece of shoe leather, and then he would write that +the dog was completely cured, and the owner might come and take it away. + +Just what is the process of the fast cure? I do not pretend to know +positively. I can only make guesses, and wait for science to +investigate. I believe that the main source of the diseases of civilized +man is improper nutrition, and the clogging of the system with food +poisons in various stages. And when you fast you do two things: first, +you stop entirely the fresh supply of those food poisons, and second, +you allow the whole of the body's digestive and assimilative tract to +rest--to go to sleep, as it were--so that all the body's energy may go +to other organs. The body carries with it at all times a surplus store +of nutriment, which can be taken up and used by the blood stream, +apparently with much less trouble than is required to convert fresh food +to the body's uses. In other words, the body can feed on its own tissues +more easily than it can feed from the stomach. In the fast you may lose +anywhere from half a pound to two pounds in weight per day, and this +will be taken, first from your store of fat, and then from your muscular +tissues. Every part of your muscular tissue will be taken, before +anything is taken from your vital organs, your nerves or your +blood-stream. So long as there is a particle of muscular material left, +so long as you can make even the slightest movement of one finger, you +are still fasting, and it is only when your muscular tissue is all gone +that you begin at last to starve. So far as I know, the cases of +MacSwiney and the other Irishman are the only cases on record where +fasters have died of starvation. + +What the body does during the fast is quite plain, and can be told by +many symptoms. It begins a thorough house-cleaning, throwing out +poisonous material by every channel. The perspiration and the breath +become offensive, the tongue becomes heavily coated, so that you can +scrape the material off with a knife. I have heard vegetarians explain +this by saying that when the body is living off its own tissues, it is +following a cannibal diet; but that is all nonsense, because you can +live on meat exclusively, and quickly satisfy yourself that none of +these symptoms occurs. It is evident that the body is taking advantage +of the opportunity to get rid of waste products; and this will go on for +ten days, for twenty days, in some cases for as long as forty or fifty +days; and then suddenly occurs a strange thing: in spite of the +"cannibal diet" the symptoms all come to a sudden end. The tongue +clears, the breath becomes sweet, the appetite suddenly awakens. + +During the period of a normal fast you lose all interest in food. You +almost forget that there is such a thing as eating; you can look at food +without any more desire for it than you have to swallow marbles and +carpet tacks. But then suddenly appetite returns, as I have explained, +and you find that you can think of nothing but food. This is what +students of the subject describe as a "complete fast," and while I do +not want to go to extremes and say that the "complete fast" will cure +every case of every disease, I can certainly say this: in the letters +which have come to me from people who tried the fast at my suggestion, +there are cases of every kind of common disease. In my book, "The +Fasting Cure," I give the results in cases reported to me after the +publication of my first magazine article. I quote two paragraphs: + +"The total number of fasts taken was 277, and the average number of days +was six. There were 90 of five days or over, 51 of ten days or over, and +six of 30 days or over. Out of the 119 person who wrote to me, 100 +reported benefit, and 17 no benefit. Of these 17 about half give wrong +breaking of the fast as the reason for the failure. In cases where the +cure had not proved permanent, about half mentioned that the recurrence +of the trouble was caused by wrong eating, and about half of the rest +made this quite evident by what they said. Also it is to be noted that +in the cases of the 17 who got no benefit, nearly all were fasts of only +three or four days. + +"Following is the complete list of diseases benefited--45 of the cases +having been diagnosed by physicians: indigestion (usually associated +with nervousness), 27; rheumatism, 5; colds, 8; tuberculosis, 4; +constipation, 14; poor circulation, 3; headaches, 5; anaemia, 3; +scrofula, 1; bronchial trouble, 5; syphilis, 1; liver trouble, 5; +general debility, 5; chills and fever, 1; blood poisoning, 1; ulcerated +leg, 1; neurasthenia, 6; locomotor ataxia, 1; sciatica, 1; asthma, 2; +excess of uric acid, 1; epilepsy, 1; pleurisy, 1; impaction of bowels, +1; eczema, 2; catarrh, 6; appendicitis, 3; valvular disease of heart, 1; +insomnia, 1; gas poisoning, 1; grippe, 1; cancer, 1." + +There are many diseases with many causes, and some yield more quickly +than others to the fast. In the first group I put the diseases of the +digestive and alimentary tract. Stomach and bowel troubles, and the +nervous disorders occasioned by these, stop almost immediately when you +fast. Next come disorders of the blood-stream, which are generally a +second stage of digestive troubles. Everything immediately due to +impurities of the blood, pimples, boils, and ulcers, inflammation, badly +healing wounds, etc., respond to a few days of fasting as to the magic +touch of the old-time legends. When it comes to diseases caused by germ +infections, you have a double aspect of the problem, and must have a +double method of attack. I would not like to say that fasting could cure +such a disease as sleeping sickness, to the germs of which our systems +are not accustomed, and against which they may well be helpless. On the +other hand, in the case of common infections, such as colds and sore +throats, the fast is again the touch of magic. Having been plagued a +great deal by these ailments in past times, I am accustomed to say that +I would not trade my knowledge of fasting for everything else that I +know about health. + +The first thing you must do if you want to take a fast is to read the +literature on the subject and make up your mind that the experiment will +do you no injury. You should also try to get your relatives to make up +their minds, because you are nervous when you are fasting, and cannot +withstand the attacks of the people around you, who will go into a panic +and throw you into a panic. As I said before, it is quite possible for +people to die of panic, but I do not believe that anybody ever died of a +fast. I have known of two or three cases of people dying while they were +fasting, but I feel quite certain that the fast did not cause their +death; they would have died anyhow. You must bear in mind that among the +people who try the fast, a great many are in a desperate condition; some +have been given up by the doctors, and if now and then one of these +should die, we may surely say that they died in spite of the fast, and +not because of it. There is no physician who can save every patient, and +it would be absurd to expect this. I have read scores of letters from +people who were at the point of death from such "fatal" diseases as +Bright's disease, sclerosis of the liver, and fatty degeneration of the +heart, and were literally snatched out of the jaws of death by beginning +a fast. I would not like to guess just what percentage of dying people +in our hospitals might be saved if the doctors would withdraw all food +from them, but I await with interest the time when medical science will +have the intelligence to try that simple experiment and report the +results. + +Just the other day in the Los Angeles county jail, a chiropractor went +on hunger strike, as a protest against imprisonment, and he fasted 41 +days. Then he broke his fast, the reason being given that his pulse was +down to 54, and he was afraid of dying. I smiled to myself. The normal +pulse is 70. I have taken my pulse many times at the end of a ten-day +fast, and it has been as low as 32, and I am not dead yet, and if I wait +to die from the symptoms of a fast, I expect to live a long time indeed! + +The first time I fasted, I felt very weak, and lay around and hardly +cared to lift my head; if I walked from my bed to the lawn, I was tired +in the legs. But since then I have grown used to fasting. I have fasted +for a week probably twenty or thirty times, and on such occasions I have +gone about my business as if nothing were happening. Of course I would +not try to play tennis, or to climb a mountain, but it is a fact that on +the seventh day of a fast in New York, I climbed the five or six flights +of stairs to the top of the Metropolitan Opera House, and felt no ill +effects from doing this. I climbed slowly, and was careful not to tire +myself. The simple rule is not to have anything that you must do on the +fast, and then do what you feel like doing. Lie down and rest, and read +a book, and take as much exercise as you find you enjoy. Keep your mind +quiet and free from worries, and lock out of the house everybody who +tells you that your heart is going to stop beating in the next few +minutes, and that you must have an injection of strychnine to start it, +and some beefsteak and fried onions to "restore your strength." Give +yourself up to the care of your wise old mother nature, who will attend +to your heart just as securely and serenely as she attended to it in the +days before you were born. + +By fasting I mean that you take no food whatever. I know some nature +cure teachers who practice what they call a "fruit fast." All I know is +that if I eat nothing but fruit, I soon have my stomach boiling with +fermentation, and also I suffer with hunger; whereas, if I take a +complete fast, I promptly forget all about food. You must drink all the +water you can on the fast. This helps nature with her house-cleaning; it +is well to drink a glass of water every half hour at least. Do not try +to go without water, and then write me that the fasting cure is a +failure. Also please do not write and ask me if it will be fasting if +you take just a little crackers and milk, or some soup, or something +else that you think doesn't count! + +I recommend a dose of laxative to clean out the system at the beginning +of a fast, because the bowels are apt to become sluggish at once, and +the quicker you get the system cleansed, the better. It does no good to +take laxatives if you are going to pile in more food, but if you are +going to fast, that is a different matter. You should take a full warm +enema every day during the fast, so long as it brings any results. There +are some people whose bowels are so frightfully clogged that I have +known the enema to bring results even in the second and third weeks. On +the other hand, if there is no solid matter to be removed, a small enema +every day will suffice. Take a warm bath every day; and needless to say, +you should get all the fresh air you can, and should sleep as much as +you can. You may have difficulty in sleeping, because the fast is apt to +make you nervous and wakeful. I have known people who could not fast +because they could not sleep, and I have taught them a little trick, to +put a hot water bottle at the feet, and another on the abdomen, to draw +the blood away from the head. So they would quickly fall asleep, and +they got great benefit from their fasts. + +You should supply yourself with good music if you can, and with plenty +of good reading matter. You will be amazed to find how active your mind +becomes; perhaps you had never known before what a mind you had. Your +blood has always been so clogged with food poisons that you didn't know +you could think. My three act play, "The Nature Woman," was conceived +and written in two days and a half on a fast; but I do not recommend +this kind of thing--on the contrary, I strongly urge against it, because +if you work your brain on a fast, you do not get the good from your +fast, and do not recover so quickly. Put off all your problems until you +have got your health back, and seek only to divert your mind while +fasting. + + + + +CHAPTER XXVI + +BREAKING THE FAST + + (Discusses various methods of building up the body after a fast, + especially the milk diet.) + + +There remains the question of how to break the fast, and this is the +most important part of the problem. You may undo all the good of your +fast by breaking it wrong, and you are a thousand times as apt to kill +yourself then, as while you are fasting. When your hunger comes back, it +comes back with a rush, and some people have not the will power to +control it. + +I do not advocate a complete fast in any case except of serious chronic +disease, and then only under the advice of someone with experience; but +I advocate a short fast of a week or ten days for almost every common +ailment, and I know that such a fast will help, even where it may not +completely cure. You may go on fasting so long as you are quiet and +happy; but when you find you are becoming too weak for comfort, or for +the peace of mind of your family physician and your friends, you may +break your fast, and show them that it is possible to restore your +strength and body weight, and then they won't bother so much when you +try it again! Take nothing but liquid foods in the breaking of a fast; I +recommend the juices of fruits and tomatoes, also meat broths. If you +have fasted a week or two, take a quarter of a glass; if you have fasted +a month, take a tablespoonful, and wait and see what the results are. +Remember that your whole alimentary tract is out of action, and give it +a chance to start up slowly. Take small quantities of liquid food every +two hours for the first day. Then you can begin taking larger +quantities, and on the next day you can try some milk, or a soft poached +egg, or the pulp of cooked apples or prunes. Do not take any solid food +until you are quite sure you can digest it, and then take only a very +little. Do not take any starchy food until the third day. + +I have known people to break these rules. I knew a man who broke his +fast on hamburg steak, and had to be helped out with a stomach pump. +Once I broke a week's fast with a plate of rich soup, because I was at a +friend's house and there was nothing else, and I yielded to the claims +of hospitality, and made myself ill and had to fast for several days +longer. + +The easiest way to break a fast is upon a milk diet. I have seen +hundreds of people take this diet, and very few who did not get benefit. +The first time I fasted, which was twelve days, I lost 17 pounds, and I +took the milk diet for 24 days thereafter, and gained 32 pounds. I took +it at MacFadden's Sanitarium, where I had every attention. Since then, I +have many times tried to take a milk diet by myself, but have never been +able to get it to agree with me. I do not know how to explain this fact; +I state it, to show how hard it is to lay down general rules. On the +milk diet you take into your system two or three times as much food as +you can assimilate, and this is a violation of all my diet rules; but it +appears that the bacteria which thrive in milk produce lactic acid, +which is not harmful to the system, and if you do not take other foods +you may safely keep the system flooded with milk. + +After a fast you should begin with small quantities of milk, and by the +third day you may be taking a full glass of warm milk every half hour or +every twenty minutes, until you have taken seven or eight quarts per +day. It is better to take it warm, but sometimes people take it just as +well without warming. Dr. Porter, who has a book on the milk diet, +insists upon complete rest, and makes his patients stay in bed. +MacFadden, on the other hand, recommends gymnastics in the morning +before the milk, and during the afternoon he recommends a rest from the +milk for a couple of hours, followed by abdominal exercises to keep the +bowels open. This is very important during a fast, because you are +taking great quantities of material into your system and it must not be +permitted to clog. Therefore take an enema daily, if necessary to a free +movement. Also take a warm bath daily. Take the juice of oranges and +lemons if you crave them. + +Upon one thing everyone who has had experience with the milk diet +agrees, and that is the necessity of absolute mental rest. If you +become excited, or nervous, or angry on a milk diet, you may turn all +the contents of your stomach into hard curds, and may put yourself into +convulsions. The wonderful thing about the milk diet is the state of +physical and mental bliss it makes possible. It is the ideal way of +breaking a fast, because it leaves you no chance to get hungry; you have +all the food you want, and your system is bathed in happiness, a sense +of peace and well-being which is truly marvelous and not to be +described. You gain anywhere from half a pound to two pounds a day, and +you feel that you have never before in your life known what perfect +health could be. The fast sets you a new standard, you discover how +nature meant you to enjoy life, and never again are you content with +that kind of half existence with which you managed to worry along before +you discovered this remedy. + +But let me hasten to add that I do not recommend the fast as a regular +habit of life. The fast is an emergency measure, to enable the body to +cleanse itself and to cure disease. When you have got your body clean +and free from disease, it is your business to keep it that way, and you +should apply your reason to the problem of how to live so that you will +not have to fast. If you find that you continue to have ailments, then +you must be eating wrongly, or overworking, or committing some other +offense against nature; either that, or else you must have some organic +trouble--a bone in your spine out of place, as the osteopaths tell you, +or your eyes out of focus, or your appendix twisted and infected. I do +not claim that the fasting cure will supplant the surgeons and the +oculists and the dentists. It will not mend your bones if you break +them, and it will not repair your teeth that are already decayed; but it +will help to keep your teeth from decaying in the future, and it will +help you to prepare for a surgical operation, and to recover from it +more quickly. I had to undergo an operation for rupture a couple of +years ago, and I fasted for two days before the operation, and for three +days after it, and I had no particle of nausea from the ether, and was +able to tend to my mail the day after the operation. + +There is one disease for which I hesitate to recommend the fast, and +that is tuberculosis, because I have been told of cases in which the +patient lost weight and did not recover it. However, in my tabulation +of 277 cases, you will note four cases of tuberculosis, and in my book +is given a letter from a patient who claimed great benefit. If I had the +misfortune to contract tuberculosis, I would take a three or four day +fast, followed by a milk diet for a long period. The milk diet is +pleasant to take, and it cannot possibly do any harm. If it did not +effect a cure, I would try the Salisbury treatment--that is, lean meat +ground up and medium cooked, and nothing else, except an abundance of +hot water between meals. Prof. Irving Fisher wrote me that there is +urgent need of experiment to determine proper diet in tuberculosis; and +until these experiments have been made, we can only grope. I am quite +sure that the "stuffing system," ordinarily used by doctors, is a tragic +mistake. + +In the case of any other disease whatever, even though I might take +medical or surgical treatment, I would supplement this by a fast, +because there is no kind of treatment which does not succeed better with +the blood in good condition. In the case of emergencies, accidents, +wounds, etc., I would rest assured that recovery would be more prompt if +I were fasting. When David Graham Phillips was shot, I wrote a letter to +the New York Call, saying that his doctors had killed him, because they +had fed him while he was lying in a critical condition in the hospital. +To take nutriment into the body under such circumstances is the greatest +of blunders. + +The fast will help children, just as it helps adults, only they do not +need to fast so long. It will help the aged and make them feel young. +(You need not be afraid to fast, no matter how old you are.) It is, of +course, an immediate cure for fatness, and strange as it may seem, it is +also a cure for unnatural thinness. People with ravenous appetites are +just as apt to be thin as to be fat, because it is not what you eat that +builds up your body, but only what you assimilate, and if you eat too +much, you can make it impossible to assimilate anything properly. If you +take a fast and break it carefully, your body will come to its normal +weight, and all your functions to their normal activity. + +A physician wrote me, taking me to task for listing among the cures +reported in my tabulation a case of locomotor ataxia. This disease, he +explained, is caused because a portion of a nerve has been entirely +destroyed, and it is a disease that is absolutely and positively and +forever incurable. I answered that I knew this to be the teaching of +present day medical science, but I invited him to consider for a moment +what happens in nature. When a crab loses a claw, we do not take it as a +matter of course that the crab must go about with one claw for the +balance of its life; nature will make that crab another claw. Man has +lost the power of replacing a lost leg, but he stills retains the power +of replacing tissue which has been cut away by a surgeon's knife, and +medical science takes this as a matter of course. How shall anybody say +that nature has forever lost the power of rebuilding a bit of nervous +tissue? How shall anyone say that if the blood-stream is cleansed of +poisons, and the energy of the whole body restored, one of the results +may not be the repairing of a broken nerve connection? I invite my +readers who have ailments, and especially I invite all medical men among +my readers, to make a fair test of the fasting cure. The results will +surprise them, and they will quickly be forced to revise their methods +of treating illness. + + + + +XXVII + +DISEASES AND CURES + + (Discusses some of the commoner human ailments, and what is known + about their cause and cure.) + + +I begin with the commonest of all troubles, known as a "cold." This name +implies that the cause of the trouble lies in exposure or chill. All the +grandmothers of the world are agreed about this. They have a phrase--or +at least they had it when I was a boy: "You will catch your death." +Every time I went out in the rain, every time I played with wet feet, or +sat in a draft, or got under a cold shower, I would hear the formula, +"You will catch your death." + +And, on the other hand, there are the "health cranks," who declare +vehemently that the name "cold" is a misnomer and a trap for people's +thoughts. Cold has nothing to do with it, they say, and point to arctic +explorers who frequently get frozen to death, but do not "catch cold" +until they get back into the warm rooms of civilization. As for drafts, +the "health cranks" aver that a draft is merely "fresh air moving"; +which is supposed to settle the matter. However, when you come to think +about it, you realize that a cyclone is likewise merely "fresh air +moving," so you have not decided the question by a phrase. + +While I was writing these chapters on health I contracted a severe +cold--which was a joke on me. The history of this cold is as clear in my +mind as anything human can be, and it will serve for an illustration, +showing how much truth the grandmothers have on their side, and how much +the "health cranks" have. + +To begin with, I had been overworking. All sorts of appeals come to me; +hundreds of people write me letters, and I cannot bear to leave them +unanswered. I accepted calls to speak, and invitations where I had to +eat a lot of stuff of which my reason disapproves; so one morning I woke +up with a slight sore throat. I fasted all day, and by evening felt all +right. But there came another call, and I consented to take a long +automobile ride on a cold and rainy night, and when I got back home, +after five or six hours, I was thoroughly chilled, and my "cold" came on +during the night. + +This explanation will, I imagine, be satisfactory to all the +grandmothers of the world. All the dear, good grandmothers know that an +automobile ride on a cold, rainy night is enough to give any man "his +death." But listen, grandmothers! I have lain out watching for deer all +night in the late fall, with only a thin blanket to cover me, and gotten +up so stiff with cold that I could hardly move; yet I did not "catch +cold." When I was a youth, I have ridden a bicycle twenty miles to the +beach in April, with snow on the ground, and plunged into the surf and +swam, and then ridden home again. I have bathed in the sea when I had to +run a quarter of a mile in a bathing suit along a frost-covered pier, +and with an icy wind blowing through my bones; yet I never took cold +from that, and never got anything but a feeling of exhilaration. So it +must be that there is some reason why exposure causes colds at one time +and not at another. + +The explanation takes you over to the "health cranks." They understand +that your blood-stream must be clogged, your bodily tone reduced by bad +air and lack of exercise, and more especially by over-eating, or by an +improperly balanced diet. But then most of them go to extremes, and +insist that the automobile ride and the chilled condition of my body had +nothing to do with my cold. But I know otherwise--I have watched the +thing happen so often. In times when I was run down, the slightest +exposure would cause me a cold, literally in a few minutes. I have got +myself a sore throat going out to the wood-pile on a winter day with +nothing on my head. I have got a cold by sitting still with wet feet, or +by sitting in a draft on a warm summer day, when I had been perspiring a +little. How to explain this I am not sure, but my guess is that you +drive the blood away from the surface of the body at a time when it is +weakened and exposed to infection, and you drive away the army of the +white corpuscles, and give the battlefield of your body to the germs. + +I know there are nature curists who argue that germs have nothing to do +with disease; but they have never been able to convince me--germs are +too real, and too many, and too easy to watch. If you leave a piece of +meat exposed to the air in warm temperature, the germs in the air will +settle upon it and begin to feed upon it and to multiply; the meat, +being dead, is powerless to protect itself. But your nose and throat are +also meat, and just as good food for the germs. The only difference is +that this meat is alive, there is a living blood-stream circulating +through it, and several score billions of the body's own kind of germs, +the blood corpuscles. If these blood corpuscles are sound and properly +nourished, and are brought to the place of infection, they are able to +destroy all the common germs; so it is that you do not have diseases, +but instead have health. But your health always implies a struggle of +your organism against other organisms, and it is the business of your +reason to watch your body and give all the help you can in protecting +it. Coughs and colds, sore throats and headaches, are the first warnings +that your defenses are being weakened. As a rule these ailments are not +serious in themselves, but they are signs of a wrong condition, and if +you neglect this condition, pretty soon you will find that you have to +deal with something deadly. + +My cure for a cold is to take an enema and a laxative, eat nothing for +twenty-four hours, and drink plenty of water. If you have a severe cold +or sore throat, you will be wise to lie in bed for a day or two, by an +open window. You may also use sprays and gargles if you wish, but you +will find them of little use, because the germs are deep in your mucous +membranes, and cannot all be reached from the outside. In the old sad +days of my ignorance I would get a cold, and go to the doctor, and have +my throat and nose pumped full of black and green and yellow and purple +liquids, which did me absolutely no good whatever; the cold would stay +on for two or three weeks, sometimes for eight or ten weeks, and I would +be miserable, utterly desperate. I was dying by inches, and not one of +the doctors could tell me why. + +The next most common ailment is a headache, and this means poisons in +your blood-stream. It may be from improper diet, from alcohol, or drugs, +or bad air, or nervous excitement. If it is none of these things, then +you should begin to look for some organic difficulty, eye-strain, for +example, or perhaps defects in the spine. The osteopaths and the +chiropractors specialize on the spine, and have made important +discoveries. Their doctrine is, in brief, that the nervous force which +directs the blood-stream is carried to the organs of the body by nerves +which leave the spinal cord through openings between the vertebrae. If +any of these openings are pinched, you have a diminished nerve supply, +which means ill-health in that part of the body to which the nerve +leads. That such trouble can be corrected by straightening the bones of +the spine, seems perfectly reasonable; but like most people with a new +idea, the discoverers proceed to carry it to absurd extremes. I have +before me an official chiropractic pamphlet which states that vertebral +displacement is "the physical and perpetuating cause of ninety-five per +cent of all cases of disease; the remaining five per cent being due to +subluxations of other skeletal segments." Naturally people who believe +this will devote nearly all their study to the bones and the nervous +system. But surely, there are other parts of your body which are +necessary besides bones and nerves! And what if some of these parts +happen to be malformed or defective? What if your eyes do not focus +properly, and you are continually wearing out the optic nerve, thus +giving yourself headaches and neurasthenia? What if you have an appendix +that has been twisted and malformed from birth, and is a center of +infection so long as it remains in the body? + +Several years ago I had an experience with the appendix, from which I +learned something about one of the commonest of human ailments, +constipation, or sluggishness of the bowels. This is a cause of +innumerable chronic ailments grouped under the head of auto-intoxication, +or the poisoning of the body by the absorption into the system of the +products of fermentation and decay in the bowels. The bowels should move +freely two or three times every day, and the movements should be soft. I +suffered from constipation for some twenty years, and tried, I think, +every remedy known both to science and to crankdom. In the beginning the +doctors gave me drugs which by irritating the intestinal walls cause +them to pour out quantities of water, and hurry the irritating +substances down the intestinal tract. That is all right for an +emergency; if you have swallowed a poison, or food which is spoiled, or +if you have overeaten and are ill, get your system cleaned out by any +and every device. But if you habitually swallow mild poisons, which is +what all laxatives are, you weaken the intestinal tract, and you have to +take more and more of these poisons, and you get less results. We may +set down as positive the statement that drugs are not a remedy for +constipation. + +Next comes diet. Eat the rough and bulky foods, say the nature curists, +and stimulate the intestinal walls to activity. I tried that. I listened +to the extreme enthusiasts, and boiled whole wheat and ate it, and +consumed quantities of bran biscuit, and of a Japanese seaweed which Dr. +Kellogg prepares, and of petroleum oil, and even the skins of oranges, +which are most uncomfortable eating, I assure you. I would eat things +like this until I got myself a case of diarrhea--and so was cured of +constipation for a time! Strange as it may seem to you, there are even +people who tell you to eat sand. I listened to them, and ate many +quarts. + +Then there is exercise. MacFadden taught me a whole series of exercises +for developing the muscles of the abdominal walls and the back, which +are greatly neglected by civilized man. The fundamental cause of +constipation is a sluggish life, and to exercise our bodies is a duty; +but to me it was always an agony of boredom to lie on a bed and wiggle +my abdomen for a quarter of an hour. The same thing applies to hot water +treatments, which are effective, but a nuisance and a waste of time. I +never could keep them up except when I was in trouble. + +Three or four years ago I began to notice a continual irritating pain in +my right side, which I quickly realized must lie in the appendix. I +tried massage, and hot and cold water treatments, and my favorite +remedy, a week's fast. The pain disappeared, but it returned, so finally +I decided, to the dismay of my physical culture friends, to have the +appendix out. For years I had been reading the statements of nature +curists, that the appendix is an important and vital part of the body, +which pours an oil or something into the intestinal tract, and so helps +to prevent constipation. Well, evidently my appendix wasn't doing its +job, so I took it to a good surgeon. What I found was that it had been +twisted and malformed from birth, so that it was a center of continuous +infection. From the time I had that operation, I have never had to think +about the subject of constipation. This experience suggests to me how +easy it is for people to make statements about health which have no +relationship to facts. + +I do not recommend promiscuous surgery, and I perfectly well realize +that if human beings would take proper care of their health, the great +proportion of surgical operations would be unnecessary. I realize, +also, that surgeons get paid by the job, and therefore have a money +interest in operating, and it is perfectly futile to expect that none of +them will ever be influenced by the profit motive. Nevertheless, it is +true that sometimes surgical operations are necessary, and that by +standing a little temporary inconvenience you can save yourself a +life-time of discomfort. + +Take, for example, rupture. The human body has here a natural weakness, +from which there results a dangerous and uncomfortable affliction. +Hundreds of thousands of men are going around all their lives wearing +elaborate and expensive trusses which are almost, if not entirely +useless, and trying advertised "cures" which are entirely fakes. An +operation takes an hour or two, and two or three weeks in bed, and when +our government drafted its young men into the army and found that +fourteen in every thousand of them had rupture, it shipped them into the +hospitals wholesale and sewed them up. It happens that rupture affords +one case where scar tissue is stronger than natural tissue, and there +were practically no returns from the great number of army cases. + +Likewise you find extreme statements repeated concerning the evils of +vaccination; but if you will read Parkman's "History of the Jesuits in +North America," you will see the horrible conditions under which the +Indians lived in the United States--noble savages, you understand, +entirely uncontaminated by civilized white men, and whole populations +regularly wiped out every few years by epidemics of smallpox. That these +epidemics ceased was due to the discovery that by infecting the body +with a mild form of the disease, it could be made to develop substances +which render it immune to the deadly form. Here in California we have a +law which makes vaccination for school children optional, and so we may +some day have another epidemic to test the theories of the +anti-vaccinationists. + +I know, of course, the dreadful stories of people who have been given +syphilis and other diseases by impure vaccines. I don't know whether +such stories are true; but I do know that people who live in houses are +sometimes killed by earthquakes and by lightning, yet we do not cease to +live in houses because of this chance. It seems to me that the remedy +for such vaccination evils is not to abolish vaccination, but to take +more care in the manufacture of our vaccines. + +This danger is removed by using vaccines which are sterile, and are made +especially for each person. Germs are taken from the sick person, and +injected into an animal. The body of the animal develops with great +rapidity the "anti-bodies" necessary to resistance to the germs; and as +these "anti-bodies" are chemical products, not affected by heat, we can +take a serum from the animal, sterilize it, and then inject it into the +system of the patient, thus increasing resistance to the disease. I +admit that the best way to increase such resistance is to take care of +your health; but sometimes we confront an emergency, and must use +emergency remedies. We have serums that really cure diphtheria and +meningitis, and one that will prevent lock-jaw; anyone who has ever seen +with his own eyes how the deadly membranes of diphtheria melt away as a +result of an injection, will be less dogmatic about the efforts of +science to combat disease. + +Of course it is much pleasanter if you can destroy the source of the +disease, and keep it from getting into the human body. Every few years +the southern part of our country used to be devastated by yellow fever +epidemics. Every kind of weird and fantastic remedy was tried; people +would go around with sponges full of vinegar hung under their noses; +they would burn the clothing and bedding of those who died of the +disease; they would wear gloves when they went shopping, so as not to +touch the money with their hands. But at last medical experimenters +traced the disease to a certain kind of mosquito, and now, if we drain +the swamps and screen our houses and stay in doors after sundown, we do +not get yellow fever, nor malaria either. In the same way, if we keep +our bodies clean with soap and hot water, we do not get bitten by lice, +and so do not die of typhus. If we take pains with our drains and water +supply, so that human excrement does not get into it, and if we destroy +the filth-carrying housefly, we do not have epidemics of typhoid. + +But under conditions of battle it is not possible for men to take these +precautions, and so when they go into the army they get a dose of +typhoid serum. And this illustrates the difference between a true or +hygienic remedy for disease, and a temporary or emergency remedy. If you +say that you want to abolish war, and with it the need for typhoid +vaccination, I cheerfully agree with you in this. All that I am trying +to do is to point out the folly of flying to extremes, and rejecting any +remedy which may help. What is the use of making the flat statement that +vaccinations and serums never aid in the cure of disease, when any man +can see with his own eyes the proof that they do? In the Spanish war, +before typhoid vaccination, many times more soldiers died of this +disease than died of bullets; but in the late war there was practically +no typhoid at all in the army camps. On the other hand, it was noticed +that the men who had just come in, and who therefore had just been +vaccinated, were considerably more susceptible to influenza; which shows +that vaccination does reduce the body condition for a time. The reader +may say that in this case I am trying to sit on both sides of the fence; +but the truth is that I am trying to keep an open mind, and to consider +all the facts, and to avoid making rash statements. + +One of the statements you hear most frequently is that drugs can never +remedy disease, or help in remedying it. Now, I abhor the drugging +system of the orthodox medical men; I have talked with them, and heard +them talk with one another, and I know that they will mix up half a +dozen different substances, in the vague hope that some one of them will +have some effect. Even when they know definitely the effects they are +producing, they are in many cases merely suppressing symptoms. On the +other hand, however, it is a fact that medical science has had for a +generation or two a specific which destroys the germs of one disease in +the blood, without at the same time injuring the blood itself. That +disease is malaria, and the drug is quinine. Of course, the way to avoid +malaria is to drain the swamps; but you cannot do that all at once, nor +can you always screen your house and stay in at sundown. When you first +go into a country, you have no house to screen, and some emergency will +certainly arise that exposes you to mosquito bites. So you will need +quinine, and will be foolish not to use it, and know how to use it. + +Recently medical chemists discovered another remedy, this time for +syphilis. It is called salvarsan, and while it does not always cure, it +frequently does. In laboratories today men are working over the problem +of constructing a combination of molecules which will destroy the germ +of sleeping sickness, without at the same time injuring the blood. If +they find it, they will save hundreds of millions of lives. I do not see +why we cannot recognize such a possibility, while at the same time +making use of physical culture, of diet and fasting. + +When the manuscript of this book was sent to the printer, there appeared +in this place a paragraph telling of the work of Dr. Albert Abrams of +San Francisco, in the diagnosis and cure of disease by means of +radio-active vibrations. As the book is going to press, the writer finds +himself in San Francisco, attending Dr. Abrams' clinics; and so he finds +it possible to give a more extended account of some fascinating +discoveries, which seem destined to revolutionize medical science. If I +were to tell all that I have seen with my own eyes in the last twelve +days, I fear the reader would find his powers of credulity +overstretched, so I shall content myself with trying to tell, in very +sober and cautious language, the theory upon which Abrams is working, +and the technic which he has evolved. + +Modern science has demonstrated that all matter is simply the activity +of electrons, minute particles of electric force. This is a statement +which no present-day physicist would dispute. The best evidence appears +to indicate that a molecule of matter is a minute reproduction of the +universe, a system of electrons whirling about a central nucleus. No eye +has ever beheld an electron, for it is billions of times smaller than +anything the microscope makes visible; but we can see the effects of +electronic activity, and all modern books of physics give photographs of +such. It is possible to determine the vibration rates of electrons, and +to Dr. Abrams occurred the idea of determining the vibration rates of +diseased tissue and disease germs. He discovered that it was invariably +the same; not merely does all cancerous material, for example, yield the +same rate, but the blood of a person suffering from cancer yields that +rate, at all times and under all circumstances. The vibration of cancer, +of tuberculosis, of syphilis--each is different, uniform and invariable. +Likewise in the blood are other vibrations, uniform and dependable, +which reveal the sex and age of the patient, the virulence of the +disease and the period of its duration--yes, and even the location in +the body, if there be some definite infected area. So here is a modern +miracle, an infallible device for the diagnosis of disease. Dr. Abrams +does not have to see the patient; all he has to have is a drop of blood +on a piece of white blotting paper, and he sits in his laboratory and +tells all about it, and somewhere several thousand miles away--in +Toronto or Boston or New Orleans--a surgeon operates and finds what he +has been told is there! + +And that is only the beginning of the wonder; because, says Abrams, if +you know the vibration rate of the electrons of germs, you can destroy +those germs. It used to be a favorite trick of Caruso to tap a glass and +determine its musical note, and then sing that note at the glass and +shatter it to bits. It is well known that horses, trotting swiftly on a +bridge, have sometimes coincided in their step with the vibration of the +bridge and thus have broken it down. On that same principle this wizard +of the electron introduces into your body radio-activity of a certain +rate--and shall I say that he cures cancer and syphilis and tuberculosis +of many years standing in a few treatments? I will not say that, because +you would not and could not believe me. I will content myself with +telling what my wife and I have been watching, twice a day for the past +twelve days. + +The scene is a laboratory, with rows of raised seats at one side for the +physicians who attend the clinic. There is a table, with the instruments +of measurement, and Dr. Abrams sits beside it, and before him stands a +young man stripped to the waist. The doctor is tapping upon the abdomen +of this man, and listening to the sounds. You will find this the +weirdest part of the whole procedure, for you will naturally assume that +this young man is being examined, and will be dazed when some one +explains that the patient is in Toronto or Boston or New Orleans, and +that this young man's body is the instrument which the doctor uses in +the determining of the vibration rates of the patient's blood. Dr. +Abrams tried numerous instruments, but has been able to find nothing so +sensitive to electronic activity as a human body. He explains to his +classes that the spinal cord is composed of millions of nerve fibres of +different vibration rates; hence a certain rate communicated to the +body, is automatically sorted out, and appears on a certain precise spot +of the body in the form of increased activity, increased blood pressure +in the cells, and hence what all physicians know as a "dull area," which +can be discovered by what is known as "percussion," a tapping with a +finger. To map out these areas is merely a matter of long and patient +experiment; and Abrams has been studying this subject for some twenty +years--he is author of a text-book on what is known as the "reactions +of Abrams." So now he provides the world with a series of maps of the +human body; and he sits in front of his "subject," and his assistant +places a specimen of blood in a little electrically connected box, and +sets the rheostat at some vibration number--say fifty--and Dr. Abrams +taps on a certain square inch of the abdomen of his "subject," and +announces the dread word "cancer." Then he places the electrode on +another part of the "subject's" body, and taps some more, and announces +that it is cancer of the small intestine, left side; some more tapping, +and he announces that its intensity is twelve ohms, which is severe; and +pretty soon there is speeding a telegram to the physician who has sent +this blood specimen, telling him these facts, and prescribing a certain +vibration rate upon the "oscilloclast," the instrument of radio-activity +which Dr. Abrams has devised. + +Now, you watch this thing for an hour or two, and you say to yourself: +"Here is either the greatest magician in the history of mankind, or else +the greatest maniac." You may have come prepared for some kind of fraud, +but you soon dismiss that, for you realize that this man is desperately +in earnest about what he is doing, and so are all the physicians who +watch him. So you seek refuge in the thought that he must be deluding +himself and them, perhaps unconsciously. But you talk with these men, +and discover that they have come from all over the country, and always +for one reason--they had sent blood specimens to Abrams, and had found +that he never made a mistake; he told them more from a few drops of the +patient's blood than they themselves had been able to find out from the +whole patient. And then into the clinic come the doctor's own +patients--I must have heard sixty or eighty of them tell their story and +many of them have been lifted from the grave. People ten years blind +from syphilis who can see; people operated on several times for cancer +and given up for dying; people with tumors on the brain, or with one +lung gone from tuberculosis. It is literally a fact that when you have +sat in Abrams' clinic for a week, all disease loses its terrors. + +This, you see, is really the mastery of life. If we can measure and +control the minute universe of the electron and the atom, we have +touched the ultimate source of our bodily life. I might take chapters of +this book to tell you of the strange experiments I have seen in this +clinic--showing you, for instance, how these vibrations respond to +thought, how by denying to himself the disease the patient can for a +few moments cancel in his body the activity of the harmful germs; +showing how the reactions differ in the different sexes and at different +ages, and how they respond to different colors and different drugs. +Abrams' method has revealed the secret of such efficacy as drugs +possess--their work is done by their radio-activity, and not by their +chemical properties. Also the problem of vaccination has been +solved--for Abrams has discovered a dread new disease, which is bovine +syphilis, originally caused in cattle by human inoculation, and now +reintroduced in the human being by vaccination, and becoming the agent +which prepares the soil of the body for such disorders as tuberculosis +and cancer. And it appears that we can all be rendered immune to these +diseases, by a few electronic vibrations, introduced into our bodies in +childhood; so is opened up to our eyes a wonderful vision of a new race, +purified and made fit for life. So here at last is science justified of +her optimism, and our faith in human destiny forever vindicated. Take my +advice, whoever you may be that are suffering, and find out about this +new work and help to make it known to the world. + +There are many romances of medical science, some of them fascinating as +murder mysteries and big game hunting. Turn to McMasters' "History of +the People of the United States" and read his account of the terrible +epidemic of yellow fever in Philadelphia a hundred years ago; I have +already referred to the weird and incredible things the people did in +their effort to ward off this plague--sponges of vinegar under their +noses and "fever fires" burning in the streets; and then a mosquito +would fly up and bite them, and in a few hours they would be dead! Or +what could be stranger than the tracing of the bubonic plague, which has +cost literally billions of human lives, to a parasite in the blood of +fleas which live on the bodies of rats! Or what could be more unexpected +than the tracing of our rheumatic aches and twinges to the root canals +of the teeth! + +One of the common ailments which afflict poor humanity is rheumatism, a +cause of endless suffering. It was supposed to be due to damp climate +and exposure, and this is true to a certain extent, in the same way that +colds are due to exposure. But the investigators realized that there +must be some bodily condition rendering one susceptible, and they set to +work to trace this condition down. The pains of rheumatism are caused by +uric acid settling in the joints of the body. What causes the uric +acid? Well, there is uric acid in red meat, so let us forbid rheumatic +people to eat it! But this is overlooking the fact that the human body +itself is a uric acid factory; and also the fact that uric acid taken +into the stomach may not remain uric acid by the time it gets to the +blood-stream. We know that you may eat a great deal of fruit acid +without necessarily making acid blood. On the other hand, you can make +acid blood by eating a lot of sugar! So you see it isn't as simple as it +sounds. + +Rheumatism has been traced to its lair, which is found to be the roots +of the teeth. Here is a part of the body difficult to get at, and as a +consequence of bad diet and unwholesome ways of living, infections will +start there, and pus sacs be formed, and the poisons absorbed into the +blood-stream and distributed through the body. The first thought is to +draw the infected teeth; but that is a serious matter, because you need +your teeth to chew your food. So the dentist has to go through a +complicated process of opening up the tooth and cleaning out the root +canals, and treating the infected spots at the roots. Then he has to +fill the tooth all the way down to the roots, leaving no place for +infection to gather. This, of course, takes time and costs money, and is +one more illustration of the fact that there is one health law for the +rich and another health law for the poor. + +All the time that I write these chapters about health I feel guilty. I +know that the wholesome food I recommend costs money, and I know that +surgery and dentistry cost money--yes, even sunlight and fresh air and +recreation; even a fast, because you have to rest while you take it, and +you have to have a roof over your head, and warmth in winter time, and +somebody to wait upon you when you are weak. I know that for a great +many of the people who read what I write, all these things are +impossible of attainment; I know that for the great majority of the +common people the benefits of science do not exist. Science discovers +how to prevent disease, but the discoveries are not applied, because the +profit system controls the world, and the profit system wants the labor +of the poor, regardless of what happens to their health. If the people +fall ill, they are thrown upon the scrap heap, and the profit system +finds others to take their place. + +Take, for example, tuberculosis. Tuberculosis is a germ infection, but +it practically never gets hold upon a human body except when the body is +reduced by undernourishment and lack of fresh air. Tuberculosis, +therefore, is a disease of slums and jails. It is definitely and +indisputably a disease of poverty. It could be wiped off the face of the +earth in a single generation; and the same is true of typhus and +typhoid. There is another whole host of ailments which could be wiped +out by measures of public hygiene, plus education. This includes all the +infant diseases, and the deadly venereal diseases. But the profit system +stands in the way; and so, in these closing paragraphs of this Book of +the Body, I say that there is one disease which is the deadliest of all, +and the source of all others, and that disease is poverty. + +I know a certain physician to the rich, who is an honest and +conscientious man. He said, "I loath my work. I am wasting my time. I am +called in by these fat, over-fed rich people in their leisure class +hotels, and what am I to say to them? Shall I say to them, 'You are +living an abnormal life, and you can never be well until you cut out +root and branch all your habits of self indulgence which are destroying +you?' But no, I can't say that--not one time in a thousand. I am +expected to be polite and serious, and to listen to them while they tell +the long tiresome story of their symptoms, and I have to encourage them, +and give them some temporary device that will remove some of the +symptoms of their trouble." + +And what should one say to this honest physician? Should one tell him to +go and be a physician to the poor? Would he be any happier there? He +could tell the poor the causes of their diseases, and they would listen +patiently--they are trained to listen, and to accept what they are told. +Here is a girl living in an inside bedroom in a tenement, and working +ten or eleven hours a day in an unventilated factory, and she is ill +with tuberculosis. The physician tells her that she needs plenty of +fresh air and rest, and a lot of eggs and milk in her diet. He tells her +that, and he knows that she has as much chance of carrying out his +orders as of flying to the moon. Or maybe he comes upon a typhoid +epidemic, and discovers, as happened to a friend of mine in Chicago, +that there is defective plumbing in some houses owned by the political +leader of the district. Or maybe it is a case of venereal disease, in a +young man who was drafted into the army and turned loose amid the joys +of Paris. Maybe it is just a commonplace, every-day story of a room full +of school children, 22 per cent of them undernourished, as is the case +in New York City, and the parents out of work a part of the time, and +with no possibility in their lives of ever earning enough to feed the +children properly. When you confront these universal facts of our +present social order, you realize that the problem of disease is not +merely a problem of the body, but is a problem of the mind as well; a +problem of politics and religion and philosophy, of the whole way of +thinking of the so-called civilized world. A book of health which did +not point out these facts would be, not a book of health, but a book of +sham. + +But meantime, while we are trying to change the world's ideas, we have +to live, and we can do our work better if we keep as well as possible. I +have tried to point out the way; it is, as you can see, a matter in part +of the body and in part of the mind. All the bodily régime here laid out +has its basis in mental habits; all wise and wholesome ways of life can, +at the age when our minds are plastic, be made into "second +nature"--things which we do automatically, without effort or temptation +to do otherwise. This is the real secret of true happiness in the +conduct of our personal lives; to acquire self-control, to rule our +desires and our passions, not harshly and spasmodically, but serenely, +as one drives a car which he thoroughly understands. It is in vain that +we preach freedom to men who have not this self-mastery; as the poet +tell us: "The sensual and the dark rebel in vain, slaves of their own +compulsion." And of all the personal possessions which man can attain on +this earth, the most precious is the one of a sound mind controlling a +sound body. I close this book by quoting some verses written by Sir +Henry Wotton three hundred years ago, which I have all my life +considered one of the noblest pieces of poetry in our heritage: + + THE CHARACTER OF A HAPPY LIFE + + How happy is he born and taught + That serveth not another's will; + Whose armour is his honest thought + And simple truth his utmost skill! + + Whose passions not his masters are, + Whose soul is still prepared for death, + Not tied unto the world with care + Of public fame, or private breath. + + Who envies none that chance doth raise + Or vice; who never understood + How deepest wounds are given by praise; + Nor rules of state, but rules of good: + + Who hath his life from rumours freed, + Whose conscience is his strong retreat; + Whose state can neither flatterers feed, + Nor ruin make accusers great: + + Who God doth late and early pray + More of His grace than gifts to lend; + And entertains the harmless day + With a well-chosen book or friend; + + --This man is freed from servile bands + Of hope to rise, or fear to fall; + Lord of himself, though not of lands; + And having nothing, yet hath all. + + + + +INDEX + + +Abrams, Dr., 190 + +Adultery, 33 + +Adventist, 99 + +Agriculture, 25 + +Alcohol, 151 + +Anti-bodies, 188 + +Antinomies, 58 + +Appendix, 186 + +Arnold, 42 + +Arrhenius, 101 + +Automatic writing, 67 + + +Bairnsfather, 29 + +Bathing, 162 + +Battle Creek Sanitarium, 118 + +Beauchamp, 70, 85, 89 + +Beethoven, 47 + +Bergson, 17 + +Beri-beri, 128 + +Bible, 77 + +Bio-chemist, 59 + +Black bread, 128 + +Blood, 106 + +Body, 53, 105 + +Booth, 58 + +Bourne, 69 + +Bruce, 71 + +Bury, 15 + + +Caffein, 150 + +Calories, 135 + +Candy, 137 + +Capitalist, 100 + +Carbohydrates, 124 + +Carbon monoxide, 157 + +Children, 140, 180 + +Chiropractors, 174, 184 + +Chittenden, 136 + +Christian Scientists, 5, 65, 105 + +Clothing, 160 + +Coffee, 151 + +Colds, 183 + +Commandments, 32 + +Communist, 99 + +Complete fast, 172 + +Comstock, 25 + +Conduct, 42 + +Consciousness, 56 + +Constipation, 185 + +Cooking, 129, 142 + +Crawford, 88 + +Cyrus, 164 + + +Dandruff, 109 + +Dante, 77 + +Darwin, 17, 46 + +Dentistry, 126, 190 + +Determinists, 57 + +Diet, 131 + +Diet Standards, 135 + +Digestion, 145 + +Diphtheria, 188 + +Diseases, 107, 117 + +Dogs, 17 + +Draft, 182 + +Drugs, 118, 150, 185, 189 + +Dubb, 63 + +Duncan, 102 + +Dyspepsia, 117 + + +Eddy, 65 + +Edison, 45, 86 + +Einstein, 101 + +Elberfeld horses, 68 + +Evolution, 8, 17 + +Exercise, 163 + + +Faith, 9 + +Faith curists, 65 + +Fast cure, 171 + +Fatness, 139 + +Fats, 124 + +Fever, 108 + +Fireless cooker, 142 + +Fireplace, 157 + +Fisher, 136 + +Fletcher, 119, 145 + +Food filter, 145 + +Fourth dimension, 5 + +Free thinker, 15 + +Freud, 71 + +Fruit fast, 175 + +Frugality, 38 + +Frying-pan, 129 + +Furnace, 157 + + +Gargles, 184 + +Gastronomic art, 148 + +Genius, 49, 60 + +George, 18 + +Germs, 183 + +God, 22, 50 + +Goethe, 47 + +Golden rule, 51 + +Greens, 132 + +Gymnastic work, 166 + + +Hair, 109 + +Hallucinations, 75 + +Hamlet, 48 + +Happiness, 9 + +Harrison, 6 + +Hats, 110 + +Headache, 122, 150, 184 + +Health cranks, 182 + +Heart, 108 + +Houdin, 93 + +Hugo, 48 + +Huxley, 17, 62 + +Hyslop, 82 + + +Iceberg, 61 + +Infanticide, 28 + +Instincts, 134 + +Intelligence, 22 + +Immortality, 79 + +Irwin, Will, 86 + + +James, 30, 59, 60 + +Jesus, 47, 48, 50, 51, 76 + +John Barleycorn, 152 + +Johnson, 58 + +Jonson, 44 + + +Kant, Immanuel, 4, 47, 51, 58 + +Kellogg, Doctor, 118, 164, 186 + +Kilmer, Joyce, 44 + +Knowledge, 94 + +Kropotkin, 18, 26 + + +Langley, 74 + +Lankester, Prof. E. Ray, 23 + +Laxatives, 175, 185 + +Leanness, 139 + +Leonardo, 47 + +Liébault, 64 + +Life, 3 + +Lily Dale, 86, 90 + +Lincoln, 47 + +Locomotor ataxia, 180 + +Lodge, Sir Oliver, 83 + +Lodge, Raymond, 87 + +London, Jack, 152 + + +Macaulay, 39 + +MacDowell, Edward, 56 + +MacFadden, 178, 186 + +MacSwiney, 170 + +Maeterlinck, Maurice, 68 + +Malaria, 189 + +Malthusian law, 25 + +Marquesans, 113 + +Materializations, 88 + +Matter, 3 + +Meal-hour, 147 + +Measurement of Intelligence, Terman's, 95 + +Meat, 121 + +Medical science, 105 + +Mesmer, 63 + +Messina earthquake, 170 + +Metaphysics, 4 + +Metchnikoff, 138 + +Milk diet, 128 + +Moderation, 39 + +Monism, 3 + +Morality, 21, 31, 34, 50 + +Morgan, 45 + +Mormon, 99 + +Mozart, 68 + +Multiple personality, 69 + +Mutation, 17 + +Myers, 49 + + +Nature, 21, 24, 29 + +Nature cure, 160 + +Nature Woman, 176 + +Neighbor, 50 + +Newcomb, Simon, 101 + +Newton, 47 + +New York Times, 169 + +Nicotine, 154 + +Nietzsche, 17 + +Novels, 164 + +Nutrition of Man, 136 + + +Oil stoves, 158 + +Opsonins, 112 + +Optimism, 42 + +Osteopaths, 184 + +Ouija, 67 + +Overeating, 134 + +Oxygen, 156 + + +Patrick, Dr., 167 + +Pavlov, 148 + +Phantasms, 75 + +Phillips, David Graham, 180 + +Piper, Mrs., 68 + +Play, 165 + +Poisons, 146 + +Pork, 142 + +Porter, Dr., 178 + +Positivists, 6 + +Poverty, 194 + +Prices of food, 141 + +Prince, Dr. Morton, 70, 89 + +Profits of Religion, 78, 99 + +Proteins, 123 + +Prunes, 127 + +Psychology, 96 + +Psychotherapy, 64 + +Puritans, 39 + + +Quackenbos, 64 + +Quinine, 188 + +Quixote, 48 + + +Raisins, 127 + +Raw food, 119 + +Read, Alfred Baker, 28 + +Reason, 13 + +Refined foods, 126 + +Relaxation, 167 + +Religion, 32 + +Reincarnation, 76 + +Rest, 146 + +Revelation, 12 + +Rheumatism, 193 + +Rice, 128 + +Rockefeller, 45 + +Roosevelt, Theodore, 25, 45 + +Rugs, 159 + +Rupture, 187 + + +Sabbath, 99 + +Salisbury, 120 + +Sally, 70, 85 + +Salt, 143 + +Meats, salted, 143 + +Salts, 124 + +Salvarsan, 189 + +Savages, 135 + +Savage, Rev. Minot J., 74 + +Schrenck-Notzing, 88 + +Scurvy, 128 + +Seneca, 98 + +Shakespeare, 47 + +Shelley, 45, 48 + +Sleep, 162 + +Sleeping sickness, 113, 173 + +Smokers, 153 + +Socialism, 167 + +Sophocles, 87 + +Sore throat, 183 + +Spencer, 8 + +Spinoza, 79 + +Spirits, 82 + +Spiritualists, 86 + +Starch, 122, 124 + +Stealing, 33 + +Steam heat, 158 + +Stimulant, 149 + +Stock Exchange, 158 + +Stomach, 105, 138, 148 + +Style, 161 + +Subconscious mind, 61 + +Sunday code, 40 + +Sugar, 126 + +Surgery, 186 + +Survival, 81 + +Survival of the fittest, 22 + +Syndicalism, 15 + +Syphilis, 189 + + +Tanner, Dr., 169 + +Tariff, 37 + +Tea, 151 + +Teeth, 127, 193 + +Telepathy, 67, 75 + +Theosophists, 76 + +Tight shoes, 161 + +Tobacco, 153 + +Tolstoi, 49 + +Tonsilitis, 107 + +Trance, 63 + +Tropism, 54 + +Tuberculosis, 112, 120, 179, 194, 195 + +Twain, Mark, 93 + +Typhoid, 112, 188, 192 + + +Uranus, 92 + +Uric acid, 193 + + +Vaccination, 187, 189 + +Vaccines, 188 + +Vegetarian, 121 + +Vitamines, 127, 142 + + +Wallace, 46 + +Wells, H. G., 22 + +Williams, Dr. Henry Smith, 102 + +Worth, Patience, 84 + + +Yellow fever, 188 + +Yogis, 90 + + + + +THE BOOK OF LIFE + +VOLUME TWO: LOVE AND SOCIETY + + _To_ + Kate Crane Gartz +in acknowledgment of her unceasing efforts for a +better world, and her fidelity to those + who struggle to achieve it. + + + + +CONTENTS + +PART THREE: THE BOOK OF LOVE + + PAGE + +CHAPTER XXVIII. THE REALITY OF MARRIAGE 3 +Discusses the sex-customs now existing in the world, +and their relation to the ideal of monogamous love. + +CHAPTER XXIX. THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARRIAGE 8 +Deals with the sex-relationship, its meaning and its history, +the stages of its development in human society. + +CHAPTER XXX. SEX AND YOUNG AMERICA 15 +Discusses present-day sex arrangements, as they affect +the future generation. + +CHAPTER XXXI. SEX AND THE "SMART SET" 23 +Portrays the moral customs of those who set the fashion +in our present-day world. + +CHAPTER XXXII. SEX AND THE POOR 29 +Discusses prostitution, the extent of its prevalence, and +the diseases which result from it. + +CHAPTER XXXIII. SEX AND NATURE 33 +Maintains that our sex disorders are not the result of +natural or physical disharmony. + +CHAPTER XXXIV. LOVE AND ECONOMICS 36 +Maintains that our sex disorders are of social origin, due +to the displacing of love by money as a motive in mating. + +CHAPTER XXXV. MARRIAGE AND MONEY 40 +Discusses the causes of prostitution, and that higher +form of prostitution known as the "marriage of convenience." + +CHAPTER XXXVI. LOVE VERSUS LUST 46 +Discusses the sex impulse, its use and misuse; when it +should be followed and when repressed. + +CHAPTER XXXVII. CELIBACY VERSUS CHASTITY 51 + +The ideal of the repression of the sex-impulse, as against +the ideal of its guidance and cultivation. + +CHAPTER XXXVIII. THE DEFENSE OF LOVE 55 + +Discusses passionate love, its sanction, its place in life, +and its preservation in marriage. + +CHAPTER XXXIX. BIRTH CONTROL 60 + +Deals with the prevention of conception as one of the +greatest of man's discoveries, releasing him from nature's +enslavement, and placing the keys of life in his hands. + +CHAPTER XL. EARLY MARRIAGE 66 + +Discusses love marriages, how they can be made, and the +duty of parents in respect to them. + +CHAPTER XLI. THE MARRIAGE CLUB 71 + +Discusses how parents and elders may help the young to +avoid unhappy marriages. + +CHAPTER XLII. EDUCATION FOR MARRIAGE 75 + +Maintains that the art of love can be taught, and that +we have the right and the duty to teach it. + +CHAPTER XLIII. THE MONEY SIDE OF MARRIAGE 79 + +Deals with the practical side of the life partnership of +matrimony. + +CHAPTER XLIV. THE DEFENSE OF MONOGAMY 83 + +Discusses the permanence of love, and why we should +endeavor to preserve it. + +CHAPTER XLV. THE PROBLEM OF JEALOUSY 89 + +Discusses the question, to what extent one person may +hold another to the pledge of love. + +CHAPTER XLVI. THE PROBLEM OF DIVORCE 93 + +Defends divorce as a protection to monogamous love, and +one of the means of preventing infidelity and prostitution. + +CHAPTER XLVII. THE RESTRICTION OF DIVORCE 97 + +Discusses the circumstances under which society has the +right to forbid divorce, or to impose limitations upon it. + + +PART FOUR: THE BOOK OF SOCIETY + +CHAPTER XLVIII. THE EGO AND THE WORLD 103 + +Discusses the beginning of consciousness, in the infant +and in primitive man, and the problem of its adjustment +to life. + +CHAPTER XLVIX. COMPETITION AND CO-OPERATION 107 + +Discusses the relation of the adult to society, and +the part which selfishness and unselfishness play in the +development of social life. + +CHAPTER L. ARISTOCRACY AND DEMOCRACY 115 + +Discusses the idea of superior classes and races, and +whether there is a natural basis for such a doctrine. + +CHAPTER LI. RULING CLASSES 119 + +Deals with authority in human society, how it is obtained, +and what sanction it can claim. + +CHAPTER LII. THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION 122 + +Discusses the series of changes through which human +society has passed. + +CHAPTER LIII. INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION 126 + +Examines the process of evolution in industry and the +stage which it has so far reached. + +CHAPTER LIV. THE CLASS STRUGGLE 132 + +Discusses history as a battle-ground between ruling and +subject classes, and the method and outcome of this +struggle. + +CHAPTER LV. THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM 136 + +Shows how wealth is produced in modern society, and +the effect of this system upon the minds of the workers. + +CHAPTER LVI. THE CAPITALIST PROCESS 142 + +How profits are made under the present industrial +system and what becomes of them. + +CHAPTER LVII. HARD TIMES 145 + +Explains why capitalist prosperity is a spasmodic thing, +and why abundant production brings distress instead of +plenty. + +CHAPTER LVIII. THE IRON RING 148 +Analyzes further the profit system, which strangles production, +and makes true prosperity impossible. + +CHAPTER LIX. FOREIGN MARKETS 151 +Considers the efforts of capitalism to save itself by marketing +its surplus products abroad, and what results from +these efforts. + +CHAPTER LX. CAPITALIST WAR 155 +Shows how the competition for foreign markets leads +nations automatically into war. + +CHAPTER LXI. THE POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCTION 158 +Shows how much wealth we could produce if we tried +and how we proved it when we had to. + +CHAPTER LXII. THE COST OF COMPETITION 162 +Discusses the losses of friction in our productive machine, +those which are obvious and those which are +hidden. + +CHAPTER LXIII. SOCIALISM AND SYNDICALISM 166 +Discusses the idea of the management of industry by the +state, and the idea of its management by the trade unions. + +CHAPTER LXIV. COMMUNISM AND ANARCHISM 170 +Considers the idea of goods owned in common, and the +idea of a society without compulsion, and how these +ideas have fared in Russia. + +CHAPTER LXV. SOCIAL REVOLUTION 175 +How the great change is coming in different industries, +and how we may prepare to meet it. + +CHAPTER LXVI. CONFISCATION OR COMPENSATION 179 +Shall the workers buy out the capitalists? Can they +afford to do it, and what will be the price? + +CHAPTER LXVII. EXPROPRIATING THE EXPROPRIATORS 183 +Discusses the dictatorship of the proletariat, and its +chances for success in the United States. + +CHAPTER LXVIII. THE PROBLEM OF THE LAND 188 +Discusses the land values tax as a means of social readjustment, +and compares it with other programs. + +CHAPTER LXIX. THE CONTROL OF CREDIT 192 +Deals with money, the part it plays in the restriction of +industry, and may play in the freeing of industry. + +CHAPTER LXX. THE CONTROL OF INDUSTRY 198 +Discusses various programs for the change from industrial +autocracy to industrial democracy. + +CHAPTER LXXI. THE NEW WORLD 202 +Describes the co-operative commonwealth, beginning +with its money aspects; the standard wage and its variations. + +CHAPTER LXXII. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION 206 +Discusses the land in the new world, and how we foster +co-operative farming and co-operative homes. + +CHAPTER LXXIII. INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTION 210 +Discusses scientific, artistic, and religious activities, as +a superstructure built upon the foundation of the standard +wage. + +CHAPTER LXXIV. MANKIND REMADE 215 +Discusses human nature and its weaknesses, and what +happens to these in the new world. + + + + +PART THREE + +THE BOOK OF LOVE + + + + +CHAPTER XXVIII + +THE REALITY OF MARRIAGE + + (Discusses the sex-customs now existing in the world, and their + relation to the ideal of monogamous love.) + + +Just as human beings through wrong religious beliefs torture one +another, and wreck their lives and happiness; just as through wrong +eating and other physical habits they make disease and misery for +themselves; just so they suffer and perish for lack of the most +elementary knowledge concerning the sex relationship. The difference is +that in the field of religious ideas it is now permissible to impart the +truth one possesses. If I tell you there is no devil, and that believing +this will not cause you to suffer in an eternity of sulphur and +brimstone, no one will be able to burn me at the stake, even though he +might like to do so. If I advise you that it is not harmful to eat +beefsteak on Friday, or to eat thoroughly cooked pork any day of the +week, neither the archbishops nor the rabbis nor the vegetarians will be +able to lock me in a dungeon. But if I should impart to you the simplest +and most necessary bit of knowledge concerning the facts of your sex +life--things which every man and woman must know if we are to stop +breeding imbecility and degeneracy in the world--then I should be +liable, under federal statutes, to pay a fine of $5,000, and to serve a +term of five years in a federal penitentiary. Scarcely a week passes +that I do not receive a letter from someone asking for information about +such matters; but I dare not answer the letters, because I know there +are agencies, maintained and paid by religious superstition, employing +spies to trap people into the breaking of this law. + +I shall tell you here as much as I am permitted to tell, in the simplest +language and the most honest spirit. I believe that human beings are +meant to be happy on this earth, and to avoid misery and disease. I +believe that they are given the powers of intelligence in order to seek +the ways of happiness, and I believe that it is a worthy work to give +them the knowledge they need in order to find happiness. + +At the outset of this Book of Love we are going to examine the existing +facts of the sex relationships of men and women in present-day society. +We shall discover that amid all the false and dishonest thinking of +mankind, there is nowhere more falsity and dishonesty than here. The +whole world is a gigantic conspiracy of "hush," and the orthodox and +respectable of the world are like worshippers of some god, who spend +their day-time burning incense before the altar, and in the night-time +steal the sacred jewels and devour the consecrated offerings. These +worshippers confront you with the question, do you believe in marriage; +and they make the assumption that the institution of marriage exists, or +at some time has existed in the world. But if you wish to do any sound +thinking about this subject, you must get one thing clear at the outset; +the institution of marriage is an ideal which has been preached and +taught, but which has never anywhere, in any society, at any stage of +human progress, actually existed as the general practice of mankind. +What has existed and still exists is a very different institution, which +I shall here describe as marriage-plus-prostitution. + +By this statement I do not mean to deny that there are many women, and a +few men, who have been monogamous all their lives; nor that there are +many couples living together happily in monogamous marriage. What I mean +is that, considering society as a whole, wherever you find the +institution of marriage, you also find, co-existent therewith and +complementary thereto, the institution of prostitution. Of this double +arrangement one part is recognized, and written into the law; the other +part is hidden, and prohibited by law; but those who have to do with +enforcing the law all know that it exists, and practically all of them +consider it inevitable, and a great many derive income from it. So I +say: if you believe in marriage-plus-prostitution, that is your right; +but if marriage is what you believe in, then your task is to consider +such questions as these: Is marriage a possible thing? Can it ever +become the sex arrangement of any society? What are the forces which +have so far prevented it from prevailing, and how can these forces be +counteracted? + +It is my belief that monogamous love is the most desirable of human sex +relationships, the most fruitful in happiness and spiritual development. +The laws and institutions of civilized society pretend to defend this +relationship, but the briefest study of the facts will convince anyone +that these laws and institutions are not really meant to protect +monogamous love. What they are is a device of the property-holding male +to secure his property rights to women, and more especially to secure +himself as to the paternity of his heirs. In primitive society, where +land and other sources of wealth were held in common, and sex monogamy +was unknown, there was no way to determine paternity, and no reason for +doing so. But under the system of private property and class privilege, +it is necessary for some one man to support a child, if it is to be +supported; and when a man has fought hard, and robbed hard, and traded +hard, and acquired wealth, he does not want to spend it in maintaining +another man's child. That he should let himself be fooled into doing so +is one of the greatest humiliations his fellowmen can imagine. If you +read Shakespeare's plays, and look up the meaning of old words, so as to +understand old witticisms and allusions, you will discover that this was +the stock jest of Shakespeare's time. + +In order to protect himself from such ridicule, the man maintained in +ancient times his right to kill the faithless woman with cruel tortures. +He maintains today the right to deprive her of her children, and of all +share in his property, even though she may have helped to earn it. But +until quite recent times, the beginning of the revolt of women, there +was never any corresponding penalty for faithlessness in husbands. Under +the English law today, the husband may divorce his wife for infidelity, +but the wife must prove infidelity plus cruelty, and the courts have +held that the cruelty must consist in knocking her down. While I was in +England, the highest court rendered a decision that a man who brought +his mistress to his home and compelled his wife to wait upon her was not +committing "cruelty" in the meaning of the English law. + +This is what is known as the "double standard," and the double standard +prevails everywhere under the system of marriage-plus-prostitution, and +proves that capitalist "monogamy" is not a spiritual ideal, but a matter +of class privilege. It is a breach of honor for the ruling class male to +tamper with the wife of his friend; it is frequently dangerous for him +to tamper with the young females of his own class; but it is in general +practice taken for granted that the young females of lower classes are +his legitimate prey. In England a man may have a marriage annulled, if +he can prove that the woman he married had what is called a "past"; but +everybody takes it for granted that the man has had a "past"; it is +covered by the polite phrase, "sowing his wild oats." Wherever among the +ruling class you find men bold enough to discuss the facts of the sex +order they have set up, you find the idea, expressed or implied, that +this "wild oats" is a necessary and inevitable part of this order, and +that without it the order would break down. The English philosopher, +Lecky, making an elaborate study of morals through the ages, speaks of +the prostitute in the following frank language: + +"Herself the supreme type of vice, she is ultimately the most efficient +guardian of virtue. But for her, the unchallenged purity of countless +happy homes would be polluted, and not a few who, in the pride of their +untempted chastity, think of her with an indignant shudder, would have +known the agony of remorse and despair. On that one degraded and ignoble +form are concentrated the passions that might have filled the world with +shame. She remains, while creeds and civilizations rise and fall, the +eternal priestess of humanity, blasted for the sins of the people." + +I invite you to study these sentences and understand them fully. +Remember that they are the opinion of the most learned historian of sex +customs who has ever written in English; a man whose authority is +recognized in our schools, whose books are in every college library. +William Edward Hartpole Lecky is not in any sense a revolutionist; he is +a conventional English scholar, an upholder of English law and order and +patriotism. He is not of my school of thought, but of those who now own +the world and run it. I quote him, because he tells in plain language +what kind of world they have made; I invite you to study his words, and +then judge my statement that the sex arrangement under which we live in +modern society is not monogamous love, but marriage-plus-prostitution. + +It is my hope to point the way to a higher system. I should like to call +it marriage; but perhaps it would be more precise to call it +marriage-minus-prostitution. In working it out, we shall have to think +for ourselves, and discard all formulas. It is obvious that our +present-day religious creeds, ethical ideals, legal codes, and social +rewards and punishments have been powerless to protect marriage, or to +make it the rule in sex relationships. So we shall have to begin at the +beginning and find new reasons for monogamous love, a new basis of +marriage other than the protection of private property. We shall have to +inform ourselves as to the fundamental purposes of sex; we shall have to +ask ourselves: What are the factors which determine rightness and +wrongness in the sex relationship? What is love, and what ought it to +be? These questions we shall try to approach without any fixed ideas +whatever. We shall decide them by the same tests that we have used in +our thinking about God and immortality, health and disease. We shall +ask, not what our ancestors believed, not what God teaches us, not what +the law ordains, not what is "respectable," nor yet what is "advanced," +according to the claim of modern sex revolutionists and "free lovers." +We shall ask ourselves, what are the facts. We shall ask, what can be +made to work in practice, what can justify itself by the tests of reason +and common sense. + + + + +CHAPTER XXIX + +THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARRIAGE + + (Deals with the sex-relationship, its meaning and its history, the + stages of its development in human society.) + + +What, in the most elemental form, is sex? It is a difference of function +which makes it necessary for two organisms to take part in the +reproduction of the species. The purpose, or at any rate the effect, of +this sex difference is the mixing of characteristics and qualities. If +the sex relationship were unnecessary to reproduction, variations might +begin, and be propagated and carried to extremes in one line of +inheritance, without ever affecting the rest of the species. Very soon +there would be no species, or rather an infinity of them; each line of +descent would fly apart, and become a group all by itself. You have +perhaps heard people comment on the fact that blondes so frequently +prefer brunettes, and that tall men are apt to marry short women, and +vice versa. This is perhaps nature's way of keeping the type uniform, of +spreading qualities widely and testing them thoroughly. Nature is +continually trying out the powers of every individual in every species, +and by the process of sexual selection she chooses, for the reproduction +of the species, the individuals which are best fitted for survival. +This, of course, refers to nature, considered apart from man. In human +society, as I shall presently show, sexual selection has been distorted, +and partly suppressed. + +Sex differentiation and sexual selection exist almost universally +throughout the animal and vegetable kingdoms, everywhere save in the +lowest forms of being. They take strange and startling forms, and like +everything else in nature manifest amazing ingenuity. People who wish to +prove this or that about human sex relations will advance arguments from +nature; but as a matter of fact we can learn nothing whatever from +nature, except her determination to preserve the products of her +activity and to keep them up to standard. Sometimes nature will give the +precedence in power, speed and beauty to the male, and sometimes to the +female. She is perfectly ruthless, and willing in the accomplishment of +her purpose to destroy the individuals of either sex. She will content +the most rabid feminist by causing the female spider to devour her mate +when his purpose has been accomplished; or by causing the male bee to +fall from his mating in the air, a disemboweled shell. + +As for man, he has won his supremacy over nature by his greater power to +combine in groups; by his more intense gregarious, or herd instincts, +which enabled him to fight and destroy creatures which would have +exterminated him if he had fought them alone. So in primitive society +everywhere, we find that the individual is subordinated to the group, +and the "folkways" give but little heed to personal rights. Very +thorough investigations have been made into the life of primitive man in +many parts of the world, and the anthropologists are now arguing over +the exact meaning of the data. We shall not here attempt to decide among +them, but rest content with the statement that communism and tribal +ownership is a widespread social form among primitive man, so much so as +to suggest that it is an early stage in social evolution. + +And this communism includes, not merely property, but sex. In the very +earliest days there was often no barrier whatever to the sex +relationship; not even between brothers and sisters, nor between parents +and children. In fact, we find savages who do not know that the sex +relationship has anything to do with procreation. But as knowledge +increases, sex "tabus" develop, some wise, and some foolish. From causes +not entirely clear, but which we discuss in Chapter XLVIII, there +gradually evolves a widespread form of sex relationship of primitive +man, the system of the "gens," as it is called. This is the Latin word +for family, but it does not mean family in the narrow sense of mother +and father and children, but in the broad sense of all those who have +blood relationship, however far removed--uncles and aunts and cousins, +as far as memory can trace. In primitive communism a man is not +permitted to enter into the sex relationship with a woman of the same +gens, but with all the women of some other gens. It is difficult for us +to imagine a society in which all the men named Jones would be married +to all the women named Smith; but that was the way whole races of +mankind lived for many thousands of years. + +In that primitive communist society, the woman was generally the equal +of the man. It is true that she did the drudgery of the camp, but the +man, on the other hand, faced the hardships of battle and the chase on +land and sea. The woman was as big as the man, and except when +handicapped by pregnancy, as strong as the man; she was as much +respected, if not more so. Her children bore her name, and were under +her control, and she was accustomed to assert herself in all affairs of +the tribe. In Frederick O'Brien's "White Shadows in the South Seas," you +may read a comical story of a journey this traveler made into the +interior of one of the cannibal islands. Everywhere he was treated with +courtesy and hospitality, but was embarrassed by continual offers from +would-be wives. In one case a powerful cannibal lady, whose advances he +rejected, picked him up and proceeded to carry him off, and he was quite +helpless in her grasp; he might have been a cannibal husband today, if +it had not been for the intervention of his fellow travelers. + +The basis of this sex equality under primitive communism is easy to +understand. All goods belonged to the tribe, and were shared alike +according to need. Children were the tribe's most precious possession; +therefore the woman suffered little handicap from having a child to bear +and feed. Primitive woman would bear her child by the roadside, and pick +it up in her arms, and continue her journey; and when she needed food, +she did not have to beg for it--if there was food for anyone, there was +food for her and her child. She did her share of the gathering and +preparing of food, because that was the habit and law of her being; she +had energies, and had never heard of the idea of not using them. + +This primitive communism generally disappears as the tribe progresses. +We cannot be sure of all the stages of its disappearance, or of the +causes, but in a general way we can say that it gives way before the +spread of slavery. In the beginning primitive man does not have any +slaves, he does not have sufficient foresight or self-restraint for +that. When he kills his enemies in battle, he builds a fire and roasts +their flesh and eats them; and those whom he captures alive, he binds +fast and takes with him, to be sacrificed to his voodoo gods. But as he +comes to more settled ways of living, and as the tribe grows larger, it +occurs to the chiefs in battle that the captives would be glad to give +their labor in return for their lives, and that it would be convenient +to have some people to do the hard and dirty work. So gradually there +comes to be a class at the bottom of society, and another class at the +top. Those who capture the slaves and keep them at work lay claim to the +products of their labor--at first better weapons and personal +adornments, then separate homes for the chiefs and priests, separate +gardens, separate flocks and herds, and--what more natural?--separate +women. + +This process becomes complete when the tribe settles down to +agriculture, and the ruling classes take possession of the land. When +once the land is privately owned, classes are fixed, and class +distinctions become the most prominent fact in society. And step by step +as this happens, we see women beaten down, from the position of the +cannibal lady, who could ask for the man she wanted and carry him off by +force if necessary, to the position of the modern woman, who is +physically weak, emotionally unstable, economically dependent, and +socially repressed. You may resent such phrases, but all you have to do +is to read the laws of civilized countries, written into the statute +books by men to define the rights and duties of women; you will see that +everywhere, before the recent feminist revolt, women were classified +under the law with children and imbeciles. + +Maternity imposes on woman a heavy burden, and before the discovery of +birth control, a burden that is continuous. For nine months she carries +the child in her body, and then for a year or two she carries it in her +arms, or on her back; and by that time there is another child, and this +continues until she is broken down. Having this burden, she cannot +possibly compete with the unburdened male for the possession of +property. So wherever there is economic competition; wherever certain +individuals or classes in the tribe or group are allowed to seize and +hold the land; wherever the products of labor cease to be the community +property, and become private property, the objects of economic strife; +then inevitably and by natural process, woman comes to be placed among +those who cannot protect themselves--that is, among the children and the +imbeciles and the slaves. Of course, some children are well cared for, +and so are some imbeciles, and some slaves, and some women. But they are +cared for as a matter of favor, not as a matter of their own power. They +proceed no longer as the cannibal lady, but by adopting and cultivating +the slave virtues, by making themselves agreeable to their masters, by +flattering their masters' vanity and sensuality--in other words by +exercising what we are accustomed to call "feminine charm." + +From early barbaric society up to the present day, we observe that there +are classes of women, just as there are classes of men. The position of +these classes changes within certain limits, but in broad outline the +conditions are fixed, and may be easily defined. There is, first of all, +the ruling class woman. She must have birth; she may or may not have +wealth, according as to whether the laws of that society or tribe permit +her to have possessions of her own, or to inherit anything from her +parents. If she has no wealth, then she will need beauty. She is the +woman who is selected by the ruling class man to bear his name and his +children, and to have charge of the household where these children are +reared, and trained for the inheriting of their father's wealth and the +carrying on of his position. This confers upon the ruling class woman +great dignity, and makes her a person of responsibility. She rules, not +merely over the slaves of the household, but over men of inferior social +classes, and in a few cases an exceptionally able woman has become a +queen, and ruled over men of her own class. This ruling class woman has +been known through all the ages by a special name, and the ways and +customs regarding her have been studied in an entertaining book, "The +Lady," by Emily James Putnam. + +Next in privilege and position to the "lady" is the mistress, the woman +who is selected by the ruling class man, not primarily to bear his +children, but to entertain and divert him. She may, of course, bear +children also. In barbaric societies, and up to quite recent times, the +importance of the ruling class man was indicated by the number of +concubines he had, and the position of these women was hardly inferior +to that of the wife or queen. In the days of the French monarchy, the +king's mistress was frequently more important than the queen; she was a +woman of ability, maintaining her supremacy in the intrigues of the +court. In ancient Greek society, the "hetairae" were a recognized class, +and Aspasia, the mistress of Pericles, was the most brilliant and most +conspicuous woman in Athens. In modern France, the position of the +mistress is recognized by the phrase "demi-monde," or half-world. The +American plutocracy has developed upon a superstructure of Puritanism, +and therefore, in America, hypocrisy is necessary. But in the great +cities of America, the vast majority of the ruling class men keep +mistresses before marriage, and a great many keep them afterwards; and +these mistresses are coming to be more and more openly flaunted, and to +acquire more and more of what is called "social position." It is +possible now in the "smart set" for a lady to accept the status of +mistress, delicately veiled, without losing caste thereby, and actresses +and other free lance women who got their start in life by taking the +position of mistress, are coming more and more to be recognized as +"ladies," and to be received into what are called the "best circles." + +There remains to be considered the position of the lower class women. In +barbarous society these women were very little different from slaves. +They had no rights of their own, except such rights as their master man +chose to allow them for his own convenience. They were sold in marriage +by their parents, and they went where they were sold, and obeyed their +new master. They became his household drudges, and reserved their +affections for him; if they failed to do this, he stoned them to death, +or strangled them with a cord and tied them in a sack and threw them +into the river. + +And, of course, the rights of the master man yielded to the rights of +men of higher classes. The king or nobleman could take any woman he +wished at any time, and he made laws to this effect and enforced them. +In feudal society the lord of the manor claimed the right of the first +night with the wives of his serfs; this was one of the ruling class +privileges which was abolished in the French revolution. Wherever the +French revolution did not succeed in affecting land tenure, the right of +the land owner to prey upon his tenant girls continues as a custom, even +though it is not written in the law, and would be denied by the +hypocritical. It prevails in Poland, as you may discover by reading +Sienkiewicz's "Whirlpools"; it prevails in England, as you may discover +from Hardy's "Tess of the d'Urbervilles." You will find that it prevails +in every part of the world where women have poverty and men have wealth +and prestige, dress suits and automobiles. You will find it wherever +there are leisure class hotels, or colleges, or other gatherings of +ruling class young males. You will find it in the theatrical and moving +picture worlds. It is well understood in the theatrical world of +Broadway that the woman "star" in the profession gets her start in life +by becoming the mistress of a manager or "angel." In the moving picture +world of Southern California it is a recognized convention, known to +everyone familiar with the business, that a young girl parts with her +virtue in exchange for an important job. + + + + +CHAPTER XXX + +SEX AND YOUNG AMERICA + + (Discusses present-day sex arrangements, as they affect the future + generation.) + + +Our first task is to consider how people actually behave in the matter +of sex--as distinguished from the way they pretend to behave. The first +and most necessary step in the cure of any disease is a correct +diagnosis, and in this case we have not merely to make the diagnosis, +but to prove it; because the most conspicuous fact about our present +sex-arrangements is a mass of organized concealment. Not merely do +teachers and preachers for the most part suppress all mention of these +subjects; but the defenders of our present economic disorder are +accustomed to acclaim the private property régime as the only basis of +family life. So long as people hold such an idea, there is no use trying +to teach them anything on the subject. There is no use talking to them +about monogamous love, because all they understand is hypocrisy. In this +chapter, therefore, we shall proceed to hold up the mirror in front of +capitalist morality. + +I pause and consider: Where shall I begin? At the top of society, or at +the bottom? With the city or the country? With the old or the young? I +think you care most of all about your boys and girls, so I am going to +tell you what is happening to the youth of America in these days of +triumphant reaction. + +I have a son, about whom naturally I think a great deal; just now he is +a student at one of our state universities, and he wrote me the other +day: "I went to a dance, and believe me, father, if you knew what these +modern dances mean, you would write something about them." I know what +they mean. They have come to us straight from the brothels of the +Argentine, among the vilest haunts of vice in the world. Others have +come from the jungle, where they were natural. The poor creature of the +jungle has his sex-desire and nothing else; he is not troubled with +brains, he does not have a complicated social organism to build up and +protect, consequently he does not need what are called "morals." But we +civilized people need morals, and we are losing them, and our society is +disintegrating, going back to the howling and fighting and cannibalism +of the jungle. + +Prof. William James, America's greatest psychologist, tells us that +going through the motions appropriate to an emotion automatically causes +that emotion to be felt. If you watch an actor preparing to rush on the +stage in an emotional scene, you will see him walking about, clenching +his fists, stamping his feet, making ferocious faces, "working himself +up." And now, what do you think is going on in the minds of young men +and women, while with their bodies they are going through procedures +which are nothing and can be nothing but imitations of sexual contact? + +The parents, it appears, are ignorant and unsophisticated, and have left +it for the children to find out what these dances mean. In Rhode Island, +one of our oldest states, is Brown College, chosen by New England's +aristocracy for the education of its sons; and these boys go to social +affairs in the best homes in Providence, and they call them +"petting-parties." And here is what they write in their college paper: + +"The modern social bud drinks, not too much, often, but enough. She +smokes unguardedly, swears considerably, and tells 'dirty' stories. All +in all, she is a most frivolous, passionate, sensation-seeking little +thing." + +This statement, published in a college paper, causes a scandal, and a +newspaper reporter goes to interview the college boy who edits the +paper, and this boy talks. He tells how he met a lovely girl at a dance, +and his heart was thrilled with the rapture of young love. "Frankly, +between you and me, I was pretty smitten with this particular little +lady. Felt about her, don't you know, like a real guy feels about the +girl he could imagine himself married to. Thought she was too nice to +touch, almost; you know the grave sort of love affair a man always has +once in a lifetime. Well, we walked a bit, and I guess I didn't say +much, for a while. I felt plenty--respectfully--just the same. And as we +turned the corner of one of the buildings here, she grasped my hand. +Hers was trembling. 'Love and let love is my motto, dearie,' said this +seraph of my dreams; 'come, we're losing a lot of time getting started.' +That girl thought I was dead slow. She didn't know that just then I +imagined the great love of my life was just entering the door. It was +cruel the way she got down from the pedestal I had built for her." + +Suppose I should ask you to name the influence that is having most to do +with shaping the thoughts of young America--what would you answer? +Undoubtedly, the moving pictures. It is from the "movies" that your +children learn what life is; if I can show you that a certain thing is +in the "movies," you can surely not deny that it is passing every day +and night into the hearts and minds of millions of our boys and girls. +Take a vote among the girls, what would they consider the most +delightful destiny in life; surely nine out of ten would answer, to +become a screen star, and pose before a world of admirers, and be paid a +million dollars a year. Make a test and see; and put that fact together +with the one I have already stated, that in order to get an important +job in the "movies," a girl must regularly and as a matter of course +part with her virtue. + +You will be told, no doubt, that this is a slanderous statement, so let +me give you a little evidence. I happened within the past year to be in +the private office of a well known moving picture producer, a man who is +married, and takes care to tell you that he loves his wife. He was +producing a play, the heroine of which was supposed to be a daughter of +Puritan New England. To play this part he had engaged a chaste girl, and +as a result was in the midst of a queer trouble, which he poured out to +me. His "leading man" had refused to act with this girl, insisting that +no girl could act a part of love unless she had had passionate +experience; no such thing had ever been heard of in moving pictures +before. Likewise, the director agreed that no girl who is chaste could +act for the screen, and the producer asked my advice about it. Mr. +William Allen White, of Kansas, was present in the office, and +authorizes me to state that he substantiates this anecdote. We both +advised the producer to stand by the girl, and he did so; and the +picture went out, and proved to be what in trade parlance is termed a +"frost"; that is to say, your children didn't care for it, and it cost +the producer something like a hundred thousand dollars to make this +attempt to defy the conventions of the moving picture world. + +I will tell you another story. I have a friend, a prominent man in Los +Angeles, who was appealed to by a young lady who wished to act in the +"movies." My friend introduced this young lady to a very prominent +screen actor, who in turn introduced her to one of the biggest producers +in America, one of the men whose "million dollar feature pictures" are +regularly exploited. The producer examined the young lady's figure, and +told her that she would "do"; he added, quite casually, and as a matter +of course, that she would be expected to "pay the price." The young lady +took exception to this proposition, and gave up the chance. She told my +friend about it, and he, being a man of the world, accustomed to dealing +with the foibles of his fellowmen, wrote a note to the actor, explaining +that inasmuch as this young lady had been socially introduced to him, +and by him socially introduced to the manager, she should not have been +expected to "pay the price." To this the actor answered that my friend +was correct, and he would see the manager about it. The manager conceded +the point, and the young lady got her chance in the "movies" and made +good without "paying the price." This story tells you all you need to +know about the difference in sex ethics that society applies to the +"lady" and to the daughter of the common people. + +You know, of course, what is the stock theme of all moving pictures--the +virtuous daughter of the people, who resists all temptations, and is +finally rescued from her would-be seducer by the strong and sturdy arm +of a male doll. Could one ask a more perfect illustration of capitalist +hypocrisy than the fact that the girl who plays this role is required to +pay with her virtue for the privilege of playing it! And if you know +anything about young girls, you can watch her playing it on the screen, +and see from her every gesture that what I am telling you is true. My +wife knows young girls, and I took her, the other day, to see a moving +picture. She said: "I have solved a problem. When I come home on the +street-cars, it happens that I ride with a lot of young girls from the +high school. I have been watching them, and I couldn't imagine what was +the matter with them. All simple, girlish straightforwardness is gone +out of them; they are making eyes, in the strangest manner--and at +nobody; just practicing, apparently. They wear yearning facial +expressions; when they start to walk, they do not walk, but writhe and +wiggle. I thought there must be some nervous eye and lip disease got +abroad in the school. But now, when I go to a moving picture, I discover +what it means. They are imitating the 'stars' on the screen!" + +In these pictures, you know, there are "ingenues," young girls engaged +in making a happy ending to the story by capturing a rich lover; and +then there are "vamps," engaged in seducing young men, or breaking up +some happy home. In old-style melodrama it was possible to tell the +"ingenue" from the "vamps"; the former would trip lightly, and glance +coyly out of the corners of her eyes, while the "vamp" moved with slow, +languished writhing, blinking heavy-lidded, sinister eyes. But +now-a-days the "vamps" have learned to pose as "ingenues," and the +"ingenues" are as vicious as the "vamps"; they both make the same +glances, and culminate in the same sensual swoon. It is all sex, and +nothing else--except revolvers and fighting, and wild rushing about. + +And then, too, there are the musical comedies, made wholly out of sex, +being known as "girl shows," or more frankly still, "leg shows." A row +of half naked women, prancing and gyrating on the stage, and in front of +them rows of bald-headed old men, gazing at them greedily; also college +boys, or boys too imbecile to get through college, sending in their +cards with boxes of costly flowers. You will be shocked as you read my +plain statements of fact, but if you are the average American, you will +take your family to a musical show which has come straight from the +brothels of Paris, every allusion of which is obscene. I remember once +being in a small town in the South, when one of these "road shows" +arrived from New York, and I realized that this institution was simply a +traveling house of ill fame; the whole male portion of the town was +a-quiver with excitement, a mixture of lust and fear. + +I live in Southern California, one of many places in America where the +idle rich gather for their diversion. The country is dotted with +palatial hotels, and a golden flood of pleasure-seekers come in every +winter. I have talked with some of the college boys in this part of the +country, and also with teachers who try to save the boys; they report +these "swell" hotels as hot-beds of vice, haunted by married women with +automobiles, and nothing to do, who wish to go into the canyons for +sexual riots. Even elderly women, white-haired women, old enough to be +your grandmother! I have had them pointed out to me in these hotels, +their cheeks and lips covered with rouge, with pink silk tights on their +calves, and nothing else almost up to their knees and nothing at all +half way down their backs. These old women seek to prey on boys, wanting +their youth, and being willing to lavish money upon them. They are +preying on your boys--you prosperous business men, who have preached the +gospel of "each for himself," and are proud of your skill to prey upon +society. You heap up your fortunes, and call it success, and are secure +and happy. You have made your children safe against want, you think; but +how are you going to make them safe against the "vamps" who prey upon +the overwhelming excitements of youth, and betray your sons before your +very eyes--teaching them lust in their youth, so that love may never be +born in their stunted hearts? All the haunts of "gilded vice" are +thriving, and somebody's boy is paying the interest on the capital, to +say nothing of paying the police. + +Many years ago I paid a call upon Anthony Comstock, head of the Society +for the Prevention of Vice. Comstock was an old-style Puritan, and many +insist that he was likewise an old-style grafter. However that may be, +he had a collection of the literature of pornography which would cause +any man to hesitate in condemning his activities. There is a vast +traffic in this kind of thing; it is sold by pack-peddlers all over the +country, and it is sold in little shops in the neighborhood of public +schools. You may be sure that in your school there are some boys who +know where to get it, even though they will not tell what they know. I +will describe just one piece that a school boy brought to me, a +catalogue of obscene literature, for sale in Spain, and to be ordered +wholesale. You know how men with wares to sell will expend their +imaginations and exhaust their vocabulary in describing to you the +charms of each particular article for sale. Here was a catalogue of one +or two hundred pages, listing thousands of items, pictures, pamphlets +and books, and various implements of vice, all set forth in that +imitation ecstasy of department stores and seed catalogues: here was +"something neat," here was a "fancy one," this one was "a peach," and +that one was "a winner." + +When I was a lad, I was tramping in the Adirondack mountains and was +picked up by an itinerant photographer. We rode all day together, and he +became friendly, and showed me some obscene pictures. Presently he +discovered that he was dealing with a young moralist, and apparently it +was the first time he had ever had that experience; he talked honestly, +and we became friends on a different basis. This man had a wife and +children at home, but he traveled all over the mountains, and was like +the sailor with a girl in every port. Also he was thoroughly familiar +with all forms of unnatural vice, and took this also as a matter of +course, and spread it on his journeys. + +The other day I read a statement by a prominent physician in New York; +he had been talking with a police captain, and had asked him to state +what in his opinion was the most significant development in the social +life of New York. The answer was, "The spread of male prostitution." +Here is a subject to which I have to admit my courage is unequal. I +cannot repeat the jokes which I have heard young men tell about these +matters, and about the attitude of the police to them. Suffice it to say +that these hideous forms of vice are now the commonplace of the +under-world of all our great cities. The other day a friend of mine was +talking with a prostitute who had left a high-class resort, where the +price charged was ten dollars, and gone to live in a "fifty-cent house," +frequented by sailors. She was asked the reason, and her explanation +was, "The sailors are natural." Dr. William J. Robinson has written in +his magazine an account of the haunts in Berlin which are frequented by +the victims of unnatural vice, there allowed to meet openly and to +solicit. Frank Harris, in his "Life of Oscar Wilde," tells how when that +scandal was at its height, and further exposure threatened, swarms of +the most prominent men in England suddenly discovered that it was +advisable for them to travel on the Continent. The great public schools +of England are rotten with these practices; the younger boys learn them +from the older ones, and are victims all the rest of their lives. And +the corruption is creeping through our own social body--and you think +that all you have to do is not to know about it! + +My friend Floyd Dell, reading this manuscript, insists that this chapter +and the one following are too severe. In case others should agree with +him, I quote two newspaper items which appear while I am reading the +proofs. The first is from an interview with H. Gordon Selfridge, the +London merchant, telling his impressions of America. He tells about the +"flappers," and then about the "shifters." + +"The other is the newly exploited 'shifters.' The 'shifters' are an +organization of mushroom growth among high school girls and boys which +is spreading through the eastern States and winning converts among +youngsters. It is described as the 'flapper Ku Klux,' and its emblem, if +worn by a girl, according to high school teachers and children's society +leaders who oppose it, to be nothing more nor less than an invitation to +be kissed. + +"To call it an organization even is exaggeration, for the 'shifters' are +better described as a secret understanding without any responsible head. + +"From being a seemingly harmless group whose emblem was originally a +brass paper clip fastened in the coat lapel it has developed by rapid +strides. Manufacturers of emblems are coining money by the sale of +hands, palm outstretched. The significance is take what you want or, as +the motto of the order says, 'be a good fellow; get something for +nothing.' One of the principles is to 'do' one's parents, referred to as +'they.'" + +The second item is an Associated Press despatch: + +"ST. LOUIS, March 10.--In reiterating his statement that a girls' and a +boys' secret organization requiring that all applicants must have +violated the moral code before admission was granted, existed in a local +high school, Victor J. Miller, president of the Board of Police +Commissioners, tonight named the Soldan High School as the one in which +the alleged immoral conditions exist. The school is attended largely by +children of the wealthy West End citizens. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXI + +SEX AND THE "SMART SET" + + (Portrays the moral customs of those who set the fashion in our + present-day world.) + + +We have discussed what is happening to our young people; let us next +consider what our mature people are doing. Having mentioned conditions +in England, I will give a glimpse of London "high life" two years before +the war. + +As a visiting writer, I was invited to luncheon at the home of a woman +novelist, whose books at that time were widely read both in her country +and here. Present at the luncheon was a prominent publisher, who I +afterwards learned was the lady's lover; also the lady's grown and +married son. The publisher looked like a buxom hunting squire, but the +lady told me that he was very unhappy, because his wife would not +divorce him. The lady had just come from a week-end party at the home of +an earl, who at this moment occupies one of the highest posts in the +gift of the British Empire. Things had gone comically wrong at this +country house party, she said, because the hostess had failed to +remember that Lord So-and-so was at present living with Lady +Somebody-else. One of the duties of hostesses at house parties, it +appears, is to know who is living with whom, in order that they may be +put in connecting rooms. In this case his Lordship had been grouchy, and +everybody's pleasure had been spoiled. + +This produced a discussion of the subject of marriage, and the son +remarked that marriage was like an old slipper; you wore it, because you +had got used to it, but you did not talk about it, because it was +unimportant and stupid. I went away, and happened to mention these +matters to a friend, who had met this woman novelist in Nice. The +novelist had there, in a group of people, been introduced to a young +girl who was suffering from neurasthenia. "My dear," said the novelist, +affectionately, "what you need is to have an illegitimate baby." + +This, you will say, is the "old world," and you always knew that it was +corrupt. If so, let me tell you a few things that I have seen among the +"upper circles" of our own great and virtuous democracy. My first +acquaintance with New York "society" came after the publication of "The +Jungle." As the author of that book I was a sensation, almost as much so +as if I had won the heavy-weight championship of the world. Out of +curiosity I accepted an invitation for a weekend amid what is called the +"hunting set" of Long Island. Here was a gorgeous palace with many +tapestries, and soft-footed servants, and decanters and cocktails at +every stage of one's journey about the place, like coaling stations on +the trade routes of the British Empire. One of the first sights that +caught my young eye was a large and stately lady in semi-undress, +smoking a big black cigar. If I were to mention her name, every +newspaper reader in America would know her; and before I had been +introduced to her, I heard two young men in evening dress make an +obscene remark about her, and what she was waiting for that evening. + +I discovered quickly that, while there was a great deal of sex among +these people, there was very little love. There was principally a wish +to score cleverly and subtly at the expense of another person's +feelings. It is called the "smart set," you understand, and I will give +you an idea of how "smart" it is. I was walking down a passage with a +lady, and on a couch sat another lady, side by side with a certain very +famous lawyer, whose golden eloquence you have probably listened to from +platforms, and whom for the purpose of this anecdote I will name Jones. +Mr. Jones and the lady on the sofa were sitting very close together, and +my companion, with a bright smile over her shoulder, called out: "Be +careful, Mary; you'll be scattering a lot of little Joneses around here +if you don't watch out!" Quite "continental," you perceive; and a long +way from the Puritanism of our ancestors! + +From there I went to the billiard-room, and observed a young man of +fashion trying to play billiards when he was half drunk. It was a funny +spectacle, and they took away his cigarette by force, for fear he would +drop it on the cloth of the billiard table. Pretty soon he was telling +about a racing meet, and an orgy with negro women in a stable. Therefore +I returned to where the ladies were gathered, and one middle-aged +matron, who had read widely, including some of my books, engaged me in +serious conversation. I came later on to know her rather well, and she +told me her views of love; the source of all the sex troubles of +humanity was that they took the relationship seriously. Modern +discoveries made it unnecessary to attach importance to it. She herself, +acting upon this theory, probably had had relations with--my friends, +reading the proofs of this book, beg me to omit the number of men, +because you would not believe me! + +You may argue that this is not typical; say that I fell into the +clutches of some particular group of degenerates. All I can tell you is +that these people are as "socially prominent" as any in New York City. I +will say furthermore that I have sat in the home of the best known +corporation lawyer in America, who was paid a million dollars to +organize the steel trust--the late James B. Dill, at that time a member +of the Court of Appeals of New Jersey--and have heard him "muck-rake" +his business friends by the hour with stories of that sort. I have heard +him tell of the "steel crowd" hiring a trolley car and a load of +prostitutes and champagne, and taking an all-night trip from one city to +another, smashing up both the car and the prostitutes. I have heard him +tell of sitting on the deck of a Sound steamer, and overhearing two of +his Wall Street associates and their wives arranging to trade partners +for the night. + +I have mentioned a lady who had a great many lovers. Once in the +dining-room of a club on Fifth Avenue, commonly known as "the +Millionaires'," a companion pointed out various people, many of whom I +had read about in the newspapers, and told me funny stories about them. +"See that old boy with a note-book," said my host. "That is Jacob +So-and-so, and he is entering up the cost of his lunch. He keeps +accounts of everything, even of his women. He told me he had had over a +thousand, and they had cost him over a million." + +It is impossible to say what is the most terrible thing in capitalist +society, but among the most terrible are assuredly the old men. The +richest and most powerful banker in America was in his sex habits the +merry jest of New York society. He took toward women the same attitude +as King Edward VII; if he wanted one, he went up and asked for her, and +it made no difference who she was, or where she was. This man's personal +living expenses were five thousand dollars a day, and all women +understood that they might have anything within reason. + +When I was a boy, living in New York, there was a certain aged +money-lender about whom one read something in the newspapers almost +every day. He was a prominent figure, because he was worth eighty +millions, yet wore an old, rusty black suit, and saved every penny. +Every now and then you would read in the paper how some woman had been +arrested for attempting to blackmail him in his office. It seemed +puzzling, because you wouldn't think of him as a likely subject for +blackmail. Some years later I met Dorothy Richardson, author of "The +Long Day," a very fine book which has been undeservedly forgotten. Miss +Richardson had been a reporter for the New York _Herald_, and had been +sent to interview this old money-lender. She was ushered into his +private office, and as soon as the attendant had gone out and closed the +door, the old man came up, and without a word of preliminaries grabbed +her in his arms like a gorilla. She fought and scratched, and got out, +and was wise enough to say nothing about it; therefore there was nothing +published about another attempt to blackmail the aged money-lender! + +What this means is that men of unlimited means live lives of unbridled +lust, and then in their old age they are helpless victims of their own +impulses. There was a certain enormously wealthy United States Senator +from West Virginia, who came very near being Vice President of the +United States. This doddering old man would go about the streets of +Washington with a couple of very decorous and carefully trained +attendants; and whenever an attractive young woman would pass on the +street, or when one would approach the Senator, these two attendants +would quietly slip their arms into his and hold him fast. They would do +this so that the ordinary person would not suspect what was going on, +but would think the old man was being supported. + +You do not have to take these things on my word; the newspapers are full +of them all the time, and they are proven in court. Just now as I write, +the president of the most powerful bank in America is claiming in court +that his children are not his own, but that their father is an Indian +guide. His wife, on the other hand, is accusing the banker of having +played the role of husband to several other women. He would take these +women traveling on his yacht, which, quaintly enough, was termed the +"Modesty." + +Also the papers have been full of the "Hamon case." Here is a wealthy +man, Republican National Committeeman from Oklahoma, who is about to go +to Washington to advise our new President whom to appoint to office from +that state. Before he goes, he casts off his mistress, and she shoots +him. She was his secretary, it appears, and helped him to make his +fortune; she has made many friends, and a million dollars is spent to +save her life. The prosecuting attorney calls her a "painted snake," and +accuses her of having sat week after week "displaying to the jury +twenty-four inches of silk stockinged shin-bone." The jury, apparently +unable to withstand this allurement, acquits the woman, and she +announces that she intends to bring suit under the man's will to get his +money! Also, she is going into the "movies," and tells us that it is to +be "for educational purposes." Everything in our capitalist society must +be "educational," you understand. It was P. T. Barnum who discovered +that the American people would flock to look at a five-legged calf, if +it was presented as "educational." + +The moving pictures and the theatres are the honey-pots which gather the +feminine beauty and youthful charm of our country for the convenience of +rich men's lust. These girls swarm in the theatrical agencies, and in +the artists' studios; they starve for a while, and finally they yield. +In every great city there are thousands of men of wealth, whose only +occupation is to prey upon such girls. I know a certain theatrical +manager, the most famous in the United States, a sensual, stout little +Jew. He is a man of culture and subtle insight, and in the course of his +conversation he described to me, quite casually and as a matter of +course, the charm of deflowering a virgin. Nothing could equal that +sensation; the first time was the last. + +Many years ago there was a horrible scandal in New York. The most famous +architect in America was murdered, and the newspapers probed into his +life, and it was revealed to us that many of the most famous artists and +men about town in New York maintained elaborate studios, equipped with +every luxury, all the paraphernalia of all the vices of the ages; and +through these places there flowed an endless stream of beautiful young +girls. In every large city in America you will find an "athletic club," +and if you go there and listen to the gossip, you discover that there +are scores of idle rich men with automobiles and private apartments, and +a staff of procurers used in preying, not merely upon young girls, but +also upon young boys. And these are not merely the children of the poor, +they are the children of all but the rich and powerful. In the "movies" +you see pictures of girls lured into automobiles, and carried out into +the country, or seduced by means of "knock-out drops," and you think +this is just "melodrama"; but it is happening all the time. In every big +city of our country the police know that hundreds of young girls +disappear every year. At a recent convention of police chiefs in +Washington, it was stated, from police records, that sixty thousand +girls disappear every year in the United States, leaving no trace. +Unless the parents happen to be in position to make a fuss, not even the +names of the girls are published in the newspapers. I do not ask you to +believe such things on my word; believe District Attorney Sims of +Chicago, who made the most thorough study of this subject ever made in +America, and wrote: + +"When a white slave is sold and landed in a house or dive she becomes a +prisoner.... In each of these places is a room having but one door, to +which the keeper holds the key. Here are locked all the street clothes, +shoes and ordinary apparel.... The finery provided for the girls is of a +nature to make their appearance on the street impossible. Then in +addition to this handicap, the girl is placed at once in debt to the +keeper for a wardrobe.... She cannot escape while she is in debt, and +she can never get out of debt. Not many of the women in this class +expect to live more than ten years--perhaps the average is less. Many +die painful deaths by disease, many by consumption, but it is hardly +beyond the truth to say that suicide is their general expectation." + + + + +CHAPTER XXXII + +SEX AND THE POOR + + (Discusses prostitution, the extent of its prevalence, and the + diseases which result from it.) + + +It is manifest that the rich cannot indulge in vices, without drawing +the poor after them; and in addition to this, the poor have their own +evil instincts, which fester in neglect. There were several hundred +thousand dark rooms, that is rooms without light or ventilation, in New +York City before the war. Now the country is reported to be short a +million homes, and in New York City working girls are sleeping six or +eight in a room. In the homes of the poor in the slums, parents and +children and boarders all sleep in one room indiscriminately, and the +world moves back to that primitive communism, in which incest is an +everyday affair, and little children learn all the vices there are. I +have in my hand a pamphlet by a physician, in charge of a hospital in +New York, who in fifteen years has examined nine hundred children who +have been raped, and the age of the youngest was eight months! I have +another pamphlet by a settlement worker, who discusses the problem of +the thousands of deserted wives, most of them with children, many with +children yet unborn. As I write, there are millions of men out of work +in our country, and these men are desperate, and they quit and take to +the road. They join the army of the casual workers, the "blanket +stiffs"; and, of course, the more there are of these men, the more +prostitutes there have to be, and the more homosexuality there will +inevitably be. + +Also the girls are out of work, and are on the streets. Many years ago I +visited the mill towns of New England, "she-towns" they are called, and +one of the young fellows said to me that you could buy a girl there for +the price of a sandwich. Read "The Long Day," to which I have previously +referred, and see how our working girls live. Dorothy Richardson +describes her room-mate, who read cheap novels which she found in the +gutter weeklies. She read them over and over; when she had got to the +bottom of the pile, she began again, because her mind was so weak that +she had forgotten everything. And then one day Miss Richardson happened +to be groping in a corner of a closet, and came upon a great pile of +bottles, and examined them, and was made sick with horror--abortion +mixtures. + +Dr. William J. Robinson, an authority on the subject, estimates that +there are one million abortions in the United States every year. Some of +these are accidental, caused by venereal disease, but the vast majority +are deliberate acts, crimes under the law, murder of human life. Dr. +Robinson also estimates, from the many thousands of cases which come to +him, that ninety-five per cent of all men have at some time practiced +self-abuse. He is a strenuous opponent of what he calls "hysteria" on +the subject of venereal disease, and insists that its prevalence is +exaggerated; that instead of one person in ten being syphilitic, as is +commonly stated, the proportion is only one in twenty. He insists that +the percentage of persons having had gonorrhea is only twenty-five per +cent, instead of seventy-five or eighty-five. I find that other +authorities generally agree in the statement that fifty per cent of +young men become infected with some venereal disease before they reach +the age of thirty. The Committee of Seven in New York estimated in 1903 +that there were two hundred thousand cases of syphilis in the city, and +eight hundred thousand of gonorrhea. There were villages in France +before the war in which twenty-five per cent of the inhabitants were +syphilitic, and in Russia there were towns in which it was said that +every person was syphilitic. We may safely say that these latter are the +only towns in Europe in which there was not an enormous increase of this +disease during and since the war. + +What are the consequences of these diseases? The consequences are +frightful suffering, not merely to persons guilty of immorality, but to +innocent persons. Dr. Morrow, generally recognized as the leading +authority on this subject, estimates that ten per cent of all wives are +infected with venereal disease by their husbands; he estimates that +thirty per cent of all the infected women in New York were wives who had +got the disease from their husbands. It is estimated that thirty per +cent of all the births, where either parent has syphilis, result in +abortions. It is estimated that fifty per cent of childlessness in +marriage is caused by gonorrhea, and twenty-five per cent of all +existing blindness. In Germany, before the war, there were thirty +thousand persons born blind from this cause. It is estimated that +ninety-five per cent of all abdominal operations performed upon women +are due to gonorrhea. And any of these horrors may fall upon persons who +lead lives of the strictest chastity. There was a case reported in +Germany of 236 children who contracted venereal disease from swimming in +a public bath. + +All these things are products of our system of +marriage-plus-prostitution. They are all part of that system, and no +study of the system is complete without them. Everywhere throughout +modern civilization prostitution is an enormous and lucrative industry. +In New York it is estimated to give employment to two hundred thousand +women, to say nothing of the managers, and the runners, and the men who +live off the women. There are thousands of resorts, large and small, +high-priced and cheap, and the police know all about it, and derive a +handsome income from it. And you find it the same in every great city of +the world; in every port where sailors land, or every place where crowds +of men are expected. If there is to be a football game, or a political +convention, the managers of the industry know about it, and while they +may never have heard the libel that Socialism preaches sexual license, +they all know that capitalism practices it, and they provide the +necessary means. In the United States there are estimated to be a half a +million prostitutes, counting the inmates of houses alone. + +During the late war, at the army bases in France, the British government +maintained official brothels; but if you published anything about this +in England, you ran a chance of having your paper suppressed. During the +occupation of the Rhine country, the French sent in negro troops, +savages from the heart of Africa, whose custom it is to cut off the ears +of their enemies in battle; and the French army compelled the German +population to supply white women for these troops. I have quoted in "The +Brass Check" a pious editorial from the Los Angeles _Times_, bidding the +mothers of America be happy, because "our boys in France" were safe in +the protecting arms of the Y. M. C. A. and the Knights of Columbus. I +dared not publish at this time a passage which I had clipped from the +London _Clarion_, in which A. M. Thompson told how he watched the +"doughboys" in the cafés of Paris, with a girl on each knee, and a +glass of wine in each hand. + +I will add one little anecdote, giving you a glimpse of the sex +conventions of war. The American army made desperate efforts to keep +down venereal disease, and required all men to report to their +regimental surgeon immediately after having had sex relations. Our army +moved into Coblentz, and the regulations strictly forbade any +fraternizing with the inhabitants. But immediately it was discovered +that there was an increase of disease, and investigation was made, and +revealed that men had been ceasing to report to the surgeons, because +they were afraid of being punished for having "fraternized with the +enemy." So a new order was issued, providing that having sexual +intercourse would not be considered as "fraternizing." I do not know any +better way to distinguish my ideal of morality from the military ideal, +than to say that according to my understanding of it, the sex +relationship should always and everywhere imply and include +"fraternizing." + +Finally, in concluding this picture of our present-day sex arrangements, +there is a brief word to be said about divorce. In the year 1916, the +last statistics available as I write, there were just over a million +marriages in the United States, and there were over one hundred and +twelve thousand divorces. This would indicate that one marriage in every +nine resulted in shipwreck. But as a matter of fact the proportion is +greater, because the marriages necessarily precede the divorces, and the +proportion of divorces in 1916 should be calculated upon the number of +marriages which took place some five or ten years previously. Of the one +million marriages in 1916, we may say that one in seven or one in eight +will end in the divorce courts. Let this suffice for a glimpse of the +system of marriage-plus-prostitution--a field of weeds which we have +somehow to plow up and prepare for a harvest of rational and honest +love! + + + + +CHAPTER XXXIII + +SEX AND NATURE + + (Maintains that our sex disorders are not the result of natural or + physical disharmony.) + + +Elie Metchnikoff, one of the greatest of scientists, wrote a book +entitled "The Nature of Man," in which he studied the human organism +from the point of view of biology, demonstrating that in our bodies are +a number of relics of past stages of evolution, no longer useful, but +rather a source of danger and harm. We have, for example, in the inner +corner of the eye a relic of that third eyelid whereby the eagle is +enabled to look at the sun. This is a harmless relic. But we have also +an appendix, a degenerate organ of digestion, or gland of secretion, +which now serves as a center of infection and source of danger. We have +likewise a lower bowel, a survival of our hay-eating days, and a cause +of autointoxication and premature death. Among the sources of trouble, +Metchnikoff names the fact that the human male possesses a far greater +quantity of sexual energy than is required for purposes of procreation. +This becomes a cause of disharmony and excess, it causes man to wreck +his health and destroy himself. + +Manifestly, this is a serious matter; for if it is true, our efforts to +find health and happiness in love are doomed to failure, and Lecky is +right when he describes the prostitute as the "guardian of virtue," the +eternal and necessary scapegoat of humanity. But I do not believe it is +true; I think that here is one more case of the endless blundering of +scientists and philosophers who attempt to teach physiology, politics, +religion and law, without having made a study of economics. I do not +believe that the sex troubles of mankind are physiological in their +nature, but have their origin in our present system of class privilege. +I believe they are caused, not by the blunders of nature, but by the +blunders of man as a social animal. + +Let us take a glimpse at primitive man. I choose the Marquesas Islands, +because we have complete reports about them from numerous observers. +Here was a race of people, not interfered with by civilization, who +manifested all that overplus of sexual energy to which Metchnikoff calls +attention. They placed no restraint whatever upon sex activity, they had +no conception of such an idea. Their games and dances were sex play, and +so also, in great part, was their religion. Yet we do not find that they +wrecked themselves. Physically speaking, they were one of the most +perfect races of which we have record. Both the men and women were +beautiful; they were active and strong from childhood to old age, +and--here is the significant thing--they were happy. They were a +laughing, dancing, singing race. They hardly knew grief or fear at all. +They knew how to live, and they enjoyed every process and aspect of +their lives, just as children do, naively and simply. This included +their sex life; and I think it assures us that there can be no such +fundamental physical disharmony in the human organism as the great +Russian scientist thought he had discovered. + +Is it not a fact that throughout nature a superfluity of any kind of +energy or product may be a source of happiness, rather than of distress? +Consider the singing of the birds! Or consider nature's impulse to cover +a field with useless plants, and how by a little cunning, we are able to +turn it into a harvest for our own use! In the life of our bodies one +may show the same thing again and again. We have within us the +possibility of and the impulse toward more muscular activity than our +survival makes necessary; but we do not regard this additional energy as +a curse of nature, and a peril to our lives--we turn out and play +baseball. We have an impulse to see more than is necessary, so we climb +mountains, or go traveling. We have an impulse to hear more, so we go to +a concert. We have an impulse to think more, so we play chess, or whist, +or write books and accumulate libraries. Never do we think of these +activities as signs of an irrevocable blunder on the part of nature. + +But about the activities of love we feel differently; and why is this? +If I say that it is because we have an unwholesome and degraded attitude +toward love, because, as a result of religious superstition we fear it, +and dare not deal with it honestly, the reader may suspect that I am +preparing to hint at some self-indulgence, some form of sex orgy such as +the "turkey trot" and the "bunny hug" and the "grizzly bear," the +"shimmy" and the "toddle" and the "cuddle." I hasten to explain that I +do not mean any of the abnormalities and monstrosities of present-day +fashionable life. Neither do I mean that we should set out to emulate +the happy cannibals in the South Seas. In the Book of the Mind I set +forth as carefully as I knew how, the difference between nature and man, +the life of instinct and the life of reason. It is my conviction that if +civilized life is to go on, there must be a far wider extension of +judgment and self-control in human affairs; our lost happiness will be +found, not by going "back to nature," but by going forward to a new and +higher state, planned by reason and impelled by moral idealism. + +But we find ourselves face to face with horrible sex disorders, and a +great scientist tells us they are nature's tragic blunder, of which we +are the helpless victims. Manifestly, the way to decide this question is +to go to nature, and see if primitive people, having the same physical +organism as ours, had the same troubles and spent their lives in the +same misery. If they did, then it may be that we are doomed; but if they +did not, then we can say with certainty that it is not nature, but +ourselves, who have blundered. Our task then becomes to apply reason to +the problem; to take our present sex arrangements, our field of +bad-smelling weeds, and plow it thoroughly, and sow it with good seed, +and raise a harvest of happiness in love. It is my belief that, +admitting true love--honest and dignified and rational love--it is +possible to pour into it any amount of sex energy, to invent a whole new +system of beautiful and happy love play. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXIV + +LOVE AND ECONOMICS + + (Maintains that our sex disorders are of social origin, due to the + displacing of love by money as a motive in mating.) + + +If the cause of our sex disorders is not physiological, what is it? +Everything in nature must have a cause, and this includes human nature, +the actions and feelings of men, both as individuals and as groups. We +hear the saying: "You can't change human nature"; but the fact is that +human nature is one of the most changeable things in the world. We can +watch it changing from age to age, for better or for worse, and if we +had the intelligence to use the forces now at our command, we could mold +human nature, as precisely as a brewer converts a carload of hops into a +certain brand of beer. Voltaire was author of the saying, "Vice and +virtue are products like vinegar." + +Our civilization is based upon industrial exploitation and class +privilege, the monopoly of the means of production and the natural +sources of wealth by a group. This enables the privileged group to live +in idleness upon the labor of the rest of society; it confers unlimited +power with practically no responsibility--a strain which not one human +being in a thousand has the moral strength to endure. History for the +past five thousand years is one demonstration after another that the +conferring upon a class of power without responsibility means the +collapse of that class and the downfall of its civilization. + +So far as concerns the ruling class male, what the system of privilege +does is to give him unlimited ability to indulge his sex desires. What +it does for the female is to submit her to the male desires, and to +abolish that mutuality in sex, that interaction between male and female +influence, which is the very essence of its purpose. Woman, in a +predatory society, is subject to a double enslavement, that of class as +well as of sex, and the result is the perverting of sexual selection, +and a constantly increasing tendency towards the survival of the unfit. + +In a state of nature the males compete among themselves for the favor of +the female. The female is not raped, nor is she kidnapped; on the +contrary, she exercises her prerogative, she inspects the various male +charms which are set before her, and selects those which please her, +according to her deeply planted instincts. The result is that the weak +and unfit males seldom have a chance to reproduce themselves, and the +procreating is done by the highest specimens of the type. + +But now we have a world which is ruled by money, in which opportunity, +and indeed survival, depend upon money, and the whole tendency of +society is to make money standards supreme. We do not like to admit +this, of course; our instincts revolt against it, and our higher +faculties reinforce the revolt, so we carefully veil our money motives, +and invent polite phrases to conceal them. You will hear people deny it +is money which determines admission into what is called "society," the +intimate life of the ruling class. They will tell you that it is not +money, it is "good taste," "refinement," "charm of personality," and so +on. But if you analyze all these things, you speedily discover that they +are made out of money; they are symbols of the possession of money, +devised by those who possess it, as a means of keeping themselves apart +from those who do not possess it. I would safely defy a member of the +ruling class to name a single element in what he calls "refinement," or +"good taste," that is not in its ultimate analysis a symbol of the +possession of money. Let it be the pronunciation of a word, or the cut +of a coat, or the method of handling a fork--whatever it may be, it is +part of a code, revealing that the person, or more important yet, the +ancestors of the person, have belonged to the leisure class, and have +had time and opportunity to learn to do things in a certain precise +conventional way. I say "conventional," for very frequently these tests +have no relationship whatever to reality. Considered as a matter of +common sense and convenience, it is a great deal better to eat peas with +a spoon than with a fork, and to use both a knife and fork in eating +lettuce; but if you eat peas with a spoon, or use a knife on lettuce, +every member of the ruling class will instantly know that you are an +interloper, as much so as if you took to throwing the china at your +hostess. + +Our culture is a money culture, our standards are money standards, and +our sex decisions are based upon money, not upon love. Any man can have +money in our society, provided the accident of birth favors him, and it +is everywhere known that any man who has money can get a wife. It is +certainly not true that any man with _no_ money can get a wife, and it +is true that most men who have little money have to take wives who have +less--that is, who belong to a lower class, according to the world's +standards. The average young girl of the propertied classes is trained +for marriage as for any other business. She is taught to be sexually +cold, but to imitate sexual excitement deliberately, so as to arouse it +in the male, and to keep herself surrounded with a swarm of males; this +being the basis of her prestige, the factor which will cause the +"eligible" man, the "catch," to desire her. In polite society this +proceeding is known as "coquetry," or "charm," and it would be no +exaggeration to say that seventy-five per cent of all the novels so far +written in the world are expositions of this activity; also that when we +go to the theater, we go in order to watch and sympathize with these +manifestations of pecuniary sexuality. + +As a rule the young girl knows what she is doing, but she is taught to +camouflage it, to preserve her "innocence." She would not dream of +marrying for money; she wants to marry something "distinguished"--that +is to say, something which has received the stamp of approval from a +world which approves money. She wants to marry somebody who is +"elegant," who is in "good form"; she wants to marry without having to +think about the horrid subject of money at all, and so she is carefully +chaperoned, and confined to a world where nothing but money is to be +met. In Tennyson's poem, "The Northern Farmer," the old fellow is +coaching his son on the subject of marriage, and they are driving along +a road, and the farmer listens to his horses' hoofs, and they are +saying, "Proputty, proputty, proputty!" The farmer sums up in one +sentence the doctrine of pecuniary marriage as it is taught to the +ruling class virgin: "Doän't thee marry for money, but goä wheer money +is." + +In this process, of course, the ruling class virgin must spend a great +deal of money in order to keep up her own prestige; and when she is +married, she must spend it to keep up the prestige of her unmarried +sisters, and then of her children. As a result of this, the only ruling +class males who can afford to marry are the rich ones. There are always +some who are richer, and these are the most desirable; so the tendency +with each generation is to put the period of marriage further off; the +man has to wait until he has accumulated enough "proputty" to satisfy +the girl of his desires--a girl whom he admires because of her pecuniary +prestige. He delays, and meantime he satisfies his passions with the +daughters of the poor. As a result of this, when he does finally come to +marry, he is apt to be unlovely and unlovable. The woman frequently does +not love him at all, but takes him cold-bloodedly because he is +"eligible"; in that case she is a cold and "sexless" wife. Or else, +after she has married him she discovers his unloveliness, and either +decides that all men are selfish brutes, and reconciles herself to a +celibate life, or else she goes out and preys upon the domestic +happiness of other women. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXV + +MARRIAGE AND MONEY + + (Discusses the causes of prostitution, and that higher form of + prostitution known as the "marriage of convenience.") + + +I realize that all these sex problems are complicated. Every case is +individual, and in no two cases can you give exactly the same +explanation. But it is my thesis that whatever the cause, if you trace +down the causes of the cause, you will find economic inequality and +class privilege. It is evident in the lives of the rich, and it is even +more evident in the lives of the poor, who are not permitted the luxury +of pretense. The poor live in a world dominated by forces which they +seldom understand, subjected to enormous pressure which crushes and +destroys them, without their being able to see it or touch it. In the +world of the poor there is first of all poverty; there is insecurity of +employment and insufficiency of wage, and the daily and hourly terror of +starvation and ruin. Above this is a world of power and luxury, a +wonderland of marvels and thrills, seen through a colored mist of +romance. The working-class girl, born to drudgery and perpetual +child-bearing, has a brief hour in which her cheeks are red and her +beauty is ripe; and out of the heaven above her steps a male creature +panoplied in the armor of ruling class prestige--that is to say, a dress +suit--and scattering about him a shower of automobile rides, jewelry and +candy and flowers. She opens her arms to him; and then, when her brief +hour of rapture is past, she becomes the domestic drudge of some +workingman, or else the inmate of a brothel. + +It is a custom of social workers and church people, seeking data about +these painful subjects, to interview numbers of prostitutes, and +question them as to the causes of their "fall"; so you read statistics +to the effect that seventeen per cent of prostitution has an economic +cause, that twenty-six per cent is caused by love of finery, etc. These +pious people, employed by the ruling class to maintain ruling class +prestige by demonstrating that wage slavery has nothing to do with +white slavery, attain their purpose by restricting the word "economic" +to food and shelter; forgetting that young girls do not live by bread +alone, but also by ribbons, and silk stockings, and moving picture +shows, and trips to Coney Island, and everything else that gives a +momentary escape from drudgery into joy. We all understand, of course, +that the daughters of the rich are entitled to joy, and we provide them +with it as a matter of course; but the daughters of the poor are +supposed to work in a cotton mill ten or eleven hours a day from +earliest childhood, and the joy we provide for them is vicarious. As a +woman poet sets it forth: + + "The golf links lie so near the mill + That almost every day + The laboring children can look out + And see the men at play." + +Some years ago my wife and I were invited to meet Mrs. Mary J. Goode, a +keeper of brothels in the "Tenderloin," who had revolted against the +system of police graft, and had exposed it in the newspapers. My wife +questioned her closely as to the psychology of people in her business, +and she insisted that the majority of prostitutes were not oversexed, +nor were they feeble minded; they were women who had loved and trusted, +and had been "thrown down." As Mrs. Goode phrased it, they said to +themselves: "Never again! After this, they'll pay!" + +As a matter of fact, the causes of prostitution are so largely economic +that the other factors are hardly worth mentioning. The sale of sex is +unknown in savage society, and would be unknown in a Socialist society. +If here and there some degenerate individual would rather sell her sex +than do her share of honest labor in a free and just world, such an +individual would become a patient in the psychopathic ward of a public +hospital. Economic forces drive women to prostitution, first, by direct +starvation, and second, by teaching them money standards of prestige, +the ideal of living without working, which is the heaven achieved by the +rich and longed for by the poor. Contributory to the process are +policemen, politicians, and judges who protect the property of the rich, +and prey upon the disinherited; also newspaper editors, college +professors, priests of God and preachers of Jesus, who attribute the +social evil to "original sin," or the "weakness of human nature." + +So far as men are concerned, economic forces operate by three main +channels; late marriage, loveless marriage, and drudgery in wives. You +will find patronizing and maintaining the brothels the following kinds +of males; first, young boys who have been taught that it is "manly" to +gratify their sex impulses; second, young men who take it for granted +that they cannot afford to marry; third, old bachelors who have looked +at marriage and decided that it is not a paying proposition; fourth, +married men who have been picked out for their money, and have come to +the conclusion that "good women" are necessarily sexless; and finally, +married men whose wives have lost the power to charm them by continuous +childbearing, and the physical and nervous strain of domestic slavery. + +This latter applies not merely to the wives of the poor. It applies to +members of the middle classes, and even of the richer classes, because +the job of managing many servants is often as trying as the doing of +one's own work. To explain how domestic drudgery is caused by economic +pressure would require a little essay in itself. The home is the place +where the man keeps his sex property apart under lock and key, and it +is, therefore, the portion of our civilization least influenced by +modern ideas. Women still drudge in separate kitchens and nurseries, as +they have drudged for thousands of years. They cook their dinners over +separate fires, and have each their own little group of children, +generally ill cared for, because the work is done by an untrained +amateur. Moreover, the prestige of this home has to be kept up, because +the social position and future prosperity of the man depend upon it. The +children must be dressed in frilled and starched clothing, which makes +them miserable, and wears out the tempers and pocketbooks of the +mothers. Costly entertainments must be given, and twice a day a meal +must be prepared for the father of the family--all good wives have +learned the ancient formula for the retention of masculine affections: +"Feed the brute!" Living in a world of pecuniary prestige, every +particle of the woman's surplus energy must go into some form of +ostentation, into buying or making things which are futile and +meaningless. In such a blind world, dazed by such a struggle, women +become irritable, they lose their sex charm, they forget all about +love; so the husband gives up hoping for the impossible, accepts the +common idea that love and marriage are incompatible, and adopts the +formula that what his wife doesn't know will not hurt her. + +And step by step, as economic evolution progresses, as vested wealth +becomes more firmly established and claims for itself a larger and +larger share of the total product of society--so step by step you find +the pecuniary ideals becoming more firmly established, you find marriage +becoming more and more a matter of property, and less and less a matter +of love. In European countries there may still be some love marriages +among the poor, but in the upper classes there is no longer any pretense +of such a thing, and if you spoke of it you would be considered absurd. +In countries of fresh and naive commercialism, like America, the women +select the men because of their money prestige; but in Germany, the +process has gone a step further--the men are so firmly established in +their class positions that they insist upon being bought with a fortune. +The same is true when titled foreigners condescend to visit our "land of +the dollar." They will stoop to a vulgar American wife only in case her +parents will make a direct settlement of a fortune upon the husband, and +then they take her back home, and find their escape from boredom in the +highly cultivated mistresses of their own land. + +Everywhere on the Continent, and in Great Britain also, it is accepted +that marriages are matters of business, and only incidentally and very +slightly of affection. The initiative is commonly taken, not by the +young people, but by the heads of the families. Preliminary protocols +are exchanged, and then the family solicitors sit down and bargain over +the matter. If they were making a deal for a carload of hams, they would +be governed by the market price of hams at the moment, also by the +reputation of that particular brand of ham; and similarly, in the case +of marriage, they are governed by the prestige of the family names, and +the market price of husbands prevailing. Always the man exacts a cash +settlement, and in Catholic countries he becomes the outright owner of +all the property of his wife, thus reducing her completely to the status +of a chattel. If any young couple dares to break through these laws of +their class, the whole class unites to trample them down. One of the +greatest of English novelists, George Meredith, wrote his greatest +novel, "The Ordeal of Richard Feverel," to show how, under the most +favorable circumstances, the union of a ruling class youth with a +farmer's daughter could result in nothing but shipwreck. + +The country in which the property marriage is most firmly established is +probably France; and in France the rights of nature are recognized in a +kind of supplementary union, which constitutes what is known as the +"domestic triangle," or in the French language, "_la vie trois_." The +young girl of the French ruling classes is guarded every moment of her +life like a prisoner in jail. She is sold in marriage, and is expected +to bear her husband an heir, possibly two or three children. After that, +she is considered, not under the law or by the church, but by the +general common sense of the community, to be free to seek satisfaction +of her love needs. Her husband has mistresses, and she has a lover, and +to that lover she is faithful, and in her dealings with him she is +guided by an elaborate and subtle code. Practically all French fiction +and drama deal with this "life in threes," and the complications and +tragedies which result from it. I name one novel, simply because it +happens to be the last that I myself have read, "The Red Lily," by +Anatole France. + +Of course, every human being knows in his heart that this is a monstrous +arrangement, and there are periods of revolt when real feeling surges up +in the hearts of men, and we have stories of true love, young and +unselfish love, such for example as Goethe's "Hermann and Dorothea," or +St. Pierre's "Paul and Virginia," or Halévy's "L'Abbe Constantin." +Everybody reads these stories and weeps over them, but everybody knows +that they are like the romantic shepherds and shepherdesses of the +ancient régime; they never had any existence in reality, and are not +meant to be taken seriously. If anybody attempts to carry them into +action, or to preach them seriously to the young, then we know that we +are dealing with a disturber of the foundations of the social order, a +dangerous and incendiary villain, and we give him a name which sends a +shudder down the spine of every friend of law and order--we call him a +"free-lover." + +I see before my eyes the wretch cowering upon the witness stand, and the +virtuous district attorney, who has perhaps spent the previous night in +a brothel, pointing a finger of accusing wrath into his face, and +thundering, "Do you believe in free love?" The wretch, if he is wise, +will not hesitate or parley; he will not ask what the district attorney +means by love, or what he means by freedom. Here in very truth is a case +where "he who hesitates is lost!" Let the wretch instantly answer, No, +he does not believe in free love, he believes in love that pays cash as +it goes; he believes in love that investigates carefully the prevailing +market conditions, decides upon a reasonable price, has the contract in +writing, and lives up to the bargain--"till death do us part." If the +witness be a woman, let the answer be that she believes in slave love; +that she expects to be sold for the benefit of her parents, the prestige +of her family and the social position of her future offspring. Let her +say that she will be a loyal and devoted servant, and will never do +anything at any time to invalidate the contract which is signed for her +by her parents or guardians. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXVI + +LOVE VERSUS LUST + + (Discusses the sex impulse, its use and misuse; when it should be + followed and when repressed.) + + +We have considered the sex disorders of our age and their causes. We +have now to grope our way towards a basis of sanity and health in these +vital matters. + +Consider man, as Metchnikoff describes him, with his overplus of sex +energy. From early youth he is besieged by impulses and desires, and as +a rule is left entirely uninstructed on the subject, having to pick up +his ideas from the conversation of older lads, who have nothing but +misinformation and perversions to give him. Nearly all these older lads +declare and believe that it is necessary to gratify the sex impulse, +that physically it is harmful not to do so. I have even heard physicians +and trainers maintain that idea. Opposed to them are the official +moralists and preachers of religion, who declare that to follow the sex +impulse, except when officially sanctioned by the church, is to commit +sin. + +At different times in my life I have talked with all kinds of people, +young and old, men and women, doctors and clergymen, teachers and +trainers of athletes, and a few wise and loving mothers who have talked +with their own boys and other boys. As a result I have come to agree +with neither side in the debate. I believe that there is a distinction +which must be drawn, and I ask you to consider it carefully, and bear it +in mind in all that I say on the problem of happiness and health in sex. + +I believe that a normal man is one being, manifesting himself in various +aspects, physical, emotional, intellectual. I believe that all these +aspects of human activity go normally together, and cannot normally be +separated, and that the separation of them is a perversion and source of +harm. I believe that the sex impulse, as it normally manifests itself, +and would manifest itself in a man if he were living a normal life, is +an impulse which includes every aspect of the man's being. It is not +merely physical desire and emotional excitement; it is intellectual +curiosity, a deep and intense interest, not merely in the body, but in +the mind and heart and personality of the woman. + +I appreciate that there is opportunity for controversy here. As a matter +of psychology, it is not easy to separate instinct from experience, to +state whether a certain impulse is innate or acquired. Some may argue +that savages know nothing about idealism in sex, neither do those modern +savages whom we breed in city slums; some may make the same assertion +concerning a great mass of loutish and sensual youths. We have got so +far from health and soundness that it is hard to be sure what is +"normal" and what is "ideal." But without going into metaphysics, I +think we can reasonably make the following statement concerning the sex +impulse at its first appearance in the average healthy youth in +civilized societies; that this impulse, going to the roots of the being, +affecting every atom of energy and every faculty, is accompanied, not +merely by happiness, but by sympathetic delight in the happiness of the +woman, by interest in the woman, by desire to be with her, to stay with +her and share her life and protect her from harm. In what I have to say +about the subject from now on, I shall describe this condition of being +and feeling by the word "love." + +But now suppose that men should, for some reason or other, evolve a set +of religious ideas which denied love, and repudiated love, and called it +a sin and a humiliation; or suppose there should be an economic +condition which made love a peril, so that the young couple which +yielded to love would be in danger of starvation, or of seeing their +children starve. Suppose there should be evolved classes of men and +women, held by society in a condition of permanent semi-starvation; +then, under such conditions, the impulse to love would become a trap and +a source of terror. Then the energies of a great many men would be +devoted to suppressing love and strangling it in themselves; then the +intellectual and spiritual sanctions of love would be withdrawn, the +beauty and charm and joy would go out of it, and it would become a +starving beggar at the gates, or a thief skulking in the night-time, or +an assassin with a dagger and club. In other words, sex would become all +the horror that it is today, in the form of purchased vice, and more +highly purchased marriage, and secret shame, and obscure innuendo. So we +should have what is, in a civilized man, a perversion, the possibility +of love which is physical alone; a purely animal thing in a being who is +not purely animal, but is body, mind and spirit all together. So it +would be possible for pitiful, unhappy man, driven by the blind urge of +nature, to conceive of desiring a woman only in the body, and with no +care about what she felt, or what she thought, or what became of her +afterwards. + +That purely physical sex desire I will indicate in our future +discussions by the only convenient word that I can find, which is lust. +The word has religious implications, so I explain that I use it in my +own meaning, as above. There is a great deal of what the churches call +lust, which I call true and honest love; on the other hand, in Christian +churches today, there are celebrated innumerable marriages between +innocent young girls and mature men of property, which I describe as +legalized and consecrated lust. + +We are now in position to make a fundamental distinction. I assert the +proposition that there does not exist, in any man, at any time of his +life, or in any condition of his health, a necessity for yielding to the +impulses of lust; and I say that no man can yield to them without +degrading his nature and injuring himself, not merely morally, but +mentally, and in the long run physically. I assert that it is the duty +of every man, at all times and under all circumstances, to resist the +impulses of lust, to suppress and destroy them in his nature, by +whatever expenditure of will power and moral effort may be required. + +I know physicians who maintain the unpopular thesis that serious damage +may be done to the physical organism of both man and woman by the long +continued suppression of the sex-life. Let me make plain that I am not +disagreeing with such men. I do not deny that repression of the sex-life +may do harm. What I do deny is that it does any harm to repress a +physical desire which is unaccompanied by the higher elements of sex; +that is to say, by affection, admiration, and unselfish concern for the +sex-partner and her welfare. When I advise a man to resist and suppress +and destroy the impulse toward lust in his nature, I am not telling him +to live a sexless life. I am telling him that if he represses lust, then +love will come; whereas, if he yields to lust, then love may never come, +he may make himself incapable of love, incapable of feeling it or of +trusting it, or of inspiring it in a woman. And I say that if, on the +other hand, he resists lust, he will pour all the energies of his being +into the channels of affection and idealism. Instead of having his +thoughts diverted by every passing female form, his energies will become +concentrated upon the search for one woman who appeals to him in +permanent and useful ways. We may be sure that nature has not made men +and women incompatible, but on the contrary, has provided for +fulfillment of the desires of both. The man will find some woman who is +looking for the thing which he has to offer--that is, love. + +And now, what about the suppression of love? Here I am willing to go as +far as any physician could desire, and possibly farther. Speaking +generally, and concerning normal adult human beings, I say that the +suppression of love is a crime against nature and life. I say that long +continued and systematic suppression of love exercises a devastating +effect, not merely upon the body, but upon the mind and all the energies +of the being. I say that the doctrine of the suppression of love, no +matter by whom it is preached, is an affront to nature and to life, and +an insult to the creator of life. I say that it is the duty of all men +and women, not merely to assert their own right to love, but to devote +their energies to a war upon whatever ideas and conventions and laws in +society deny the love-right. + +The belief that long continued suppression of love does grave harm has +been strongly reinforced in the last few years by the discovery of +psycho-analysis, a science which enables us to explore our unconscious +minds, and lay bare the secrets of nature's psychic workshop. These +revelations have made plain that sex plays an even more important part +in our mental lives than we realized. Sex feeling manifests itself, not +merely in grown people, but in the tiniest infants; in these latter it +has of course no object in the opposite sex, but the physical sensations +are there, and some of their outward manifestations; and as the infant +grows, and realizes the outside world, the feelings come to center upon +others, the parents first of all. These manifestations must be guided, +and sometimes repressed; but if this is done violently, by means of +terror, the consequences may be very harmful--the wrong impulses or the +terrors may survive as a "complex" in the unconscious mind, and cause a +long chain of nervous disorders and physical weaknesses in the adult. +These things are no matter of guesswork, they have been proven as +thoroughly as any scientific discovery, and are used in a new technic of +healing. Of course, as with every new theory, there are unbalanced +people who carry it to extremes. There are fanatics of Freudianism who +talk as if everything in the human unconsciousness were sex; but that +need not blind us to the importance of these new discoveries, and the +confirmation they bring to the thesis that sane and normal love, wisely +guided by common sense and reasoned knowledge, is at a certain period of +life a vital necessity to every sound human being. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXVII + +CELIBACY VERSUS CHASTITY + + (The ideal of the repression of the sex impulse, as against the + ideal of its guidance and cultivation.) + + +There are two words which we need in this discussion, and as they are +generally used loosely, they must now be defined precisely. The two +words are celibacy and chastity. We define celibacy as the permanent and +systematic suppression of love. We define chastity, on the other hand, +as the permanent and systematic suppression of lust. Chastity, as the +word is here used, is not a denial of love, but a preparing for it; it +is the practice and the ideal, necessary especially in the young, of +consecrating their beings to the search for love, and to becoming worthy +for love. In that sense we regard chastity as one of the most essential +of virtues in the young. It is widely taught today, but ineffectively, +because unintelligently and without discrimination; because, in other +words, it is confused with celibacy, which is a perversion of life, and +one of humanity's intellectual and moral diseases. + +The origin of the ideal of celibacy is easy to understand. At a certain +stage in human development the eyes of the mind are opened, and to some +man comes a revelation of the life of altruism and sympathetic +imagination. To use the common phrase, the man discovers his spiritual +nature. But under the conditions then prevailing, all the world outside +him is in a conspiracy to strangle that nature, to drag it down and +trample it into the mire. One of the most powerful of these destructive +agencies, as it seems to the man, is sex. By means of sex he is laid +hold upon by strange and terrible creatures who do not understand his +higher vision, but seek only to prey upon him, and use him for their +convenience. At the worst they rob him of everything, money, health, +time and reputation; at best, they saddle him and bridle him, they put +him in harness and set him to dragging a heavy load. In the words of a +wise old man of the world, Francis Bacon, "He who marries and has +children gives hostages to fortune." In a world wherein war, pestilence, +and famine held sway, the man of family had but slight chance of +surviving as a philosopher or prophet or saint. Discovering in himself a +deep-rooted and overwhelming impulse to fall into this snare, he +imagined a devil working in his heart; so he fled away to the desert, +and hid in a cave, and starved himself, and lashed himself with whips, +and allowed worms and lice to devour his body, in the effort to destroy +in himself the impulse of sex. + +So the world had monasteries, and a religious culture, not of much use, +but better than nothing; and so we still have in the world celibate +priesthoods, and what is more dangerous to our social health, we have +the old, degraded notions of the essential vileness of the sex +relationship--notions permeating all our thought, our literature, our +social conventions and laws, making it impossible for us to attain true +wisdom and health and happiness in love. + +I say the ideal of celibacy is an intellectual and moral disease; it is +a violation of nature, and nature devotes all her energies to breaking +it down, and she always succeeds. There never has been a celibate +religious order, no matter how noble its origin and how strict its +discipline, which has not sooner or later become a breeding place of +loathsome unnatural vices. And sooner or later the ideal begins to +weaken, and common sense to take its place, and so we read in history +about popes who had sons, and we see about us priests who have "nieces" +and attractive servant girls. Make the acquaintance of any police +sergeant in any big city of America, and get him to chatting on friendly +terms, and you will discover that it is a common experience for the +police in their raids upon brothels to catch the representatives of +celibate religious orders. As one old-timer in the "Tenderloin" of New +York said to me, "Of course, we don't make any trouble for the good +fathers." Nor was this merely because the old sergeant was an Irishman +and a Catholic; it was because deep down in his heart he knew, as every +man knows, that the craving of a man for the society and companionship +of a woman is an overwhelming craving, which will break down every +barrier that society may set against it. + +There is another form of celibacy which is not based upon religious +ideas, but is economic in its origin, and purely selfish in its nature. +It is unorganized and unreasoned, and is known as "bachelorhood"; it has +as its complements the institutions of old maidenhood and of +prostitution. Both forms of celibacy, the religious and the economic, +are entirely incompatible with chastity, which is only possible where +love is recognized and honored. Chastity is a preparation for love; and +if you forbid love, whether by law, or by social convention, or by +economic strangling, you at once make chastity a Utopian dream. You may +preach it from your pulpits until you are black in the face; you may +call out your Billy Sundays to rave, and dance, and go into convulsions; +you may threaten hell-fire and brimstone until you throw whole audiences +into spasms--but you will never make them chaste. On the contrary, +strange and horrible as it may seem, those very excitements will turn +into sexual excitements before your eyes! So subtle is our ancient +mother nature, and so determined to have her own way! + +The abominable old ideal of celibacy, with its hatred of womanhood, its +distrust of happiness, its terror of devils, is not yet dead in the +world. It is in our very bones, and is forever appearing in new and +supposed to be modern forms. Take a man like Tolstoi, who gained +enormous influence, not merely in Russia, but throughout the world among +people who think themselves liberal--humanitarians, pacifists, +philosophic anarchists. Tolstoi's notions about sex, his teachings and +writings and likewise his behavior toward it, were one continuous +manifestation of disease. All through his youth and middle years, as an +army officer, popular novelist, and darling of the aristocracy, his life +was one of license, and the attitude toward women he thus acquired, he +never got out of his thoughts to his last day. Gorky, meeting him in his +old age, reports his conversation as unpleasantly obscene, and his whole +attitude toward women one of furtive and unwholesome slyness. + +But Tolstoi was in other ways a great soul, one of the great moral +consciences of humanity. He looked about him at a world gone mad with +greed and hate, and he made convulsive efforts to reform his own spirit +and escape the power of evil. As regards sex, his thought took the form +of ancient Christian celibacy. Man must repudiate the physical side of +sex, he must learn to feel toward women a "pure" affection, the +relationship of brother and sister. In his novel, "Resurrection," +Tolstoi portrays a young aristocrat who meets a beautiful peasant girl +and conceives for her such a noble and generous emotion; but gradually +the poison of physical sex-desire steals into his mind, he seduces her, +and she becomes a prostitute. Later in life, when he discovers the crime +he has committed, he humbles himself and follows her into exile, and +wins her to God and goodness by the unselfish and unsexual love which he +should have maintained from the beginning. + +It was Tolstoi's teaching that all men should aspire toward this kind of +love, and when it was pointed out to him that if this doctrine were to +be applied universally, the human race would become extinct, his answer +was that there was no reason to fear that, because only a few people +would be good enough and strong enough to follow the right ideal! Here +you see the reincarnation of the old Christian notion that we are +"conceived in sin and born in iniquity." We may be pure and good, and +cease to exist; or we may sin, and let life continue. Some choose to +sin, and these sinners hand down their sinful qualities to the future; +and so virtue and goodness remain what they have always been, a futile +crying out in the wilderness by a few religious prophets, whom God has +sent to call down destruction upon a world which He had made--through +some mistake never satisfactorily explained! + +It is easy nowadays to persuade intelligent people to laugh at such a +perverted view of life; but the truth is that this attitude toward sex +is written, not merely into our religious creeds and formulas, but into +most of our laws and social conventions. It is this, which for +convenience I will call the "monkish" view of love, which prevents our +dealing frankly and honestly with its problems, distinguishing between +what is wrong and what is right, and doing anything effective to remedy +the evils of marriage-plus-prostitution. That is why I have tried so +carefully to draw the distinction between what I call love and what I +call lust; between the ideal of celibacy, which is a perversion, and the +idea of chastity, which must form an essential part of any regimen of +true and enduring love. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXVIII + +THE DEFENSE OF LOVE + + (Discusses passionate love, its sanction, its place in life, and + its preservation in marriage.) + + +I have before me as I write a newspaper article by Robert Blatchford, a +great writer and great man. He is dealing with the subject of "Love and +Marriage," and his doctrine is summed up in the following sentences: +"There is a difference between loving a woman and falling in love with +her. The love one falls into is a sweet illusion. But that fragrant +dream does not last. In marriage there are no fairies." + +This expresses one of the commonest ideas in the world. Passionate love +is one thing, and marriage is another and different thing, and it is no +more possible to reconcile them than to mix oil and water. Our notions +of "romantic" love took their rise in the Middle Ages, from the songs +and narratives of the troubadours, and this whole tradition was based +upon the glorification of illegitimate and extra-marital love. That +tradition has ruled the world of art ever since, and rules it today. I +do not exaggerate when I say that it is the conventional view of grand +opera and the drama, of moving pictures and novels, that impassioned and +thrilling love is found before marriage, and is found in adultery and in +temptations to adultery, but is never found in marriage. I have a pretty +varied acquaintance with the literature of the world, and I have sat and +thought for quite a while, without being able to recall a single +portrait of life which contradicts this thesis; and certainly anyone +familiar with literature could name ten thousand novels and dramas and +grand operas which support the thesis. + +English and American Puritanism have beaten the tradition down to this +extent: the novelist portrays the glories and thrills of young love, and +carries it as far as the altar and the orange blossoms and white ribbons +and showers of rice--and stops. He leaves you to assume that this +delightful rapture continues forever after; but he does not attempt to +show it to you--he would not dare attempt to show it, because the +general experience of men and women in marriage would make him +ridiculous. So he runs away from the issue; if he tells you a story of +married life, it is a story of a "triangle"--the thrills of love +imperiling marriage, and either crushed out, or else wrecking the lives +of the victims. Such is the unanimous testimony of all our arts today, +and I submit it as evidence of the fact that there must be something +vitally wrong with our marriage system. + +Personally, I am prepared to go as far as the extreme sex-radical in the +defense of love and the right to love. I believe that love is the most +precious of all the gifts of life. I accept its sanctions and its +authority. I believe that it is to be cherished and obeyed, and not to +be run away from or strangled in the heart. I believe that it is the +voice of nature speaking in the depths of us, and speaking from a wisdom +deeper than we have yet attained, or may attain for many centuries to +come. And when I say love, I do not mean merely affection. I do not mean +merely the habit of living in the same home, which is the basis of +marriage as Blatchford describes it. What I mean is the love of the +poets and the dreamers, the "young love" which is thrill and ecstasy, a +glorification and a transfiguration of the whole of life. I say that, +far from giving up this love for marriage, it is the true purpose of +marriage to preserve this love and perpetuate it. + +To save repetition and waste of words, let us agree that from now on +when I use the word love, I mean the passionate love of those who are +"in love." I believe that it is the right of men and women to be "in +love," and that there is no true marriage unless they are "in love," and +stay "in love." I believe that it is possible to apply reason to love, +to learn to understand love and the ways of love, to protect it and keep +it alive in marriage. Blatchford writes the sentence, "Matrimony cannot +be all honeymoon." I answer that assuredly it can be, and if you ask me +how I know, I tell you that I know in the only way we really know +anything--because I have proven it in my own life. I say that if men and +women would recognize the perpetuation of the honeymoon as the purpose +of marriage, and would devote to that end one-hundredth part of the +intelligence and energy they now devote to the killing of their fellow +human beings in war, we might have an end to the wretched "romantic +tradition" which makes the most sacred emotion of the human heart into +a sneak-thief skulking in the darkness, entering our lives by back +alleys and secret stairways--while greed and worldly pomp, dullness and +boredom, parade in by the front entrance. + +In the first place, what is love--young love, passionate love, the love +of those who "fall in"? I know a certain lady, well versed in worldly +affairs, who says that it is at once the greatest nonsense and the +deadliest snare in the world. This lady was trained as a "coquette"; +she, and all the young ladies she knew, made it their business to cause +men to fall in love with them, and their prestige was based upon their +skill in that art. So to them "love" was a joke, and men "in love" were +victims, whether ridiculous or pitiable. To this I answer that I know +nothing in life that cannot be "faked"; but an imitation has value only +as it resembles something that is real, and that has real value. + +I am aware that it is possible for a society to be so corrupted, so +given up to the admiration of imitations, of the paint and powder and +silk-stocking-clad-ankle kind of love, that true and genuine love +interest, with its impulse to self-sacrifice and self-consecration, is +no longer felt or understood. I am aware that in such a society it is +possible for even the very young to be so sophisticated that what they +take to be love is merely vanity, the worship of money, and the grace +and charm which the possession of money confers. I have known girls who +were "head over heels" in love, and thought it was with a man, when +quite clearly they were in love with a dress suit or a social position. +In such a society it is hard to talk about natural emotions, and deep +and abiding and disinterested affections. + +Nevertheless, amid all the false conventions, the sham glories and +cowardices of our civilization, there abides in the heart the craving +for true love, and the idea of it leaps continually into flame in the +young. In spite of the ridicule of the elders, in spite of blunders and +tragic failures, in spite of dishonesties and deceptions--nevertheless, +it continues to happen that out of a thousand maidens the youth finds +one whose presence thrills him with a new and terrible emotion, whose +lightest touch makes him shiver, almost makes his knees give way. + +If you will recall what I have written about instinct and reason, you +will know that I am not a blind worshipper of our ancient mother +nature. I am not humble in my attitude toward her, but perfectly willing +to say when I know more than she does. On the other hand, when I know +nothing or next to nothing, I am shy of contradicting my ancient mother, +and disposed to give respectful heed to her promptings. One of the +things about which we know almost nothing at present is the subject of +eugenics. We are only at the beginning of trying to find out what +matings produce the best offspring. Meantime, we ought to consider those +indications which nature gives us, just as we consider her advice about +what food to eat and what rest to take. + +It is not my idea that science will ever take men and women and marry +them in cold blood, as today we breed our cattle. What I think will +happen is that young men and women will meet one another, as they do at +present, and will find the love impulse awakening; they will then submit +their love to investigation, as to whether they should follow that +impulse, or should wait. In other words, I do not believe that science +will ever do away with the raptures of love, but will make itself the +servant of these raptures, finding out what they mean, and how their +precious essence may be preserved. + +I perfectly understand that the begetting of children is not the only +purpose of love. The children have to be reared and trained, which means +that a home has to be founded, and the parents have to learn to +co-operate. They have to have common aims in life, and temperaments +sufficiently harmonious so that they can live in the house together +without tearing each other's eyes out. This means that in any civilized +society all impulses of love have to be subjected to severe criticism. I +intend, before long, to show just how I think parents and guardians +should co-operate with young people in love; to help them to understand +in advance what they are doing, and how it may be possible for them to +make their love permanent and successful. For the moment I merely state, +to avoid any possible misunderstanding, that I am the last person in the +world to favor what is called "blind" love, the unthinking abandonment +to an impulse of sex passion. What I am trying to show is that the +passionate impulse, the passionate excitement of the young couple, is +the material out of which love and marriage are made. Passion is a part +of us, and a fundamental part. If we do not find a place for it in +marriage, it will seek satisfaction outside of marriage, and that means +lying, or the wrecking of the marriage, or both. + +Passion is what gives to love and marriage its vitality, its energy, its +drive; in fact, it gives these qualities to the whole character. It is a +vivifying force, transfiguring the personality, and if it is crushed and +repressed, the whole life of that person is distorted. Yet it is a fact +which every physician knows, that millions of women marry and live their +whole lives without ever knowing what passionate gratification is. As a +consequence of this, millions of men take it for granted that there are +"good" women and "bad" women, and that only the latter are interesting. +This, of course, is simply one of the abnormalities caused by the +supplanting of love by money as a motive in marriage. Love becomes a +superfluity and a danger, and all the forces of society, including +institutionalized religion, combine to outlaw it and drive it +underground. Or we might say that they lock it in a dungeon--and that +the supreme delight of all the painters, poets, musicians, dramatists +and novelists of all climes and all periods of history, is to portray +the escape of the "young god" from these imprisonments. The story is +told in six words of an old English ballad: "Love will find out the +way!" + +Is it not obvious that there must be something vitally wrong with our +institutions and conventions in matters of sex, when here exists this +eternal war between our moralists and our artists? Why not make up our +minds what we really believe; whether it is true that poets are, as +Shelley said, "the unacknowledged legislators of mankind," or whether +they are, as Plato declared, false teachers and seducers of the young. +If they are the latter, let us have done with them, let us drive them +from the state, together with lovers and all other impassioned persons. +But if, on the other hand, it is truth the poets tell about life, then +let us take the young god out of his dungeon, and bring him into our +homes by the front door, and cast out the false gods of vanity and greed +and worldly prestige which now sit in his place. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXIX + +BIRTH CONTROL + + (Deals with the prevention of conception as one of the greatest of + man's discoveries, releasing him from nature's enslavement, and + placing the keys of life in his hands.) + + +I assume that you have followed my argument, and are prepared to +consider seriously whether it may be possible to establish love in +marriage as the sex institution of civilized society. If you really wish +to bring such an institution into existence, the first thing you have to +do is to accomplish the social revolution; that is, you must wipe out +class control of society, and prestige based upon money exploitation. +But that is a vast change, and will take time, and meanwhile we have to +live, and wish to live with as little misery as possible. So the +practical question becomes this: Suppose that you, as an individual, +wish to find as much happiness in love as may now be possible, what +counsel have I to offer? If you are young, you wish this advice for +yourself; while if you are mature, you wish it for your children. I will +put my advice under four heads: First, marriage for love; second, birth +control; third, early marriage; fourth, education for marriage. + +The first of these we have considered at some length. A part of the +process of social revolution is personal conversion; the giving up by +every individual of the worldly ideal, the surrender of luxury and +self-indulgence, the consecrating of one's life to self education and +the cause of social justice. And do not think that that is an easy +thing, or an unimportant thing, a thing to be taken for granted. On the +contrary, it is something that most of us have to struggle with at every +hour of our lives, because respect for property and worldly conventions +has become one of our deepest instincts; our whole society is poisoned +with it, and I can count on the fingers of one hand the people I have +known in my life who have completely escaped from it. It is not merely a +question of refusing to marry except for love, it is a question of +refusing to love except for honest and worthy qualities. It is a +question of saving our children from the damnable forces of snobbery, +which lay siege to their young minds and destroy the best impulses of +their hearts, while we in our blindness are still thinking of them as +babies. + +Of the other three topics that I have suggested, I begin with birth +control, because it is the most fundamental and most important. Without +birth control there can be no freedom, no happiness, no permanence in +love, and there can be no mastery of life. Birth control is one of the +great fundamental achievements of the human reason, as important to the +life of mankind as the discovery of fire or the invention of printing. +Birth control is the deliverance of womankind, and therefore of mankind +also, from the blind and insane fecundity of nature, which created us +animals, and would keep us animals forever if we did not rebel. + +Ever since the dawn of history, and probably for long ages before that, +our race has been struggling against this blind insanity of nature. +Poor, bewildered Theodore Roosevelt stormed at what he called "race +suicide," thinking it was some brand new and terrible modern corruption; +but nowhere do we find a primitive tribe, nowhere in history do we find +a race which did not seek to save itself from overgrowth and consequent +starvation. They did not know enough to prevent conception, but they did +the best they could by means of abortion and infanticide. And because +today superstition keeps the priceless knowledge of contraception from +the vast majority of women, these crude, savage methods still prevail, +and we have our million abortions a year in the United States. Assuming +that something near one-fourth our population consists of women capable +of bearing children, we have one woman in twenty-five going through this +agonizing and health-wrecking experience every year. They go through +with it, you understand, regardless of everything--all the moralists and +preachers and priests with their hell fire and brimstone. They go +through with it because we have both marriage without love, and love +without marriage; also because we permit some ten or twenty per cent of +our total population to suffer the pangs of perpetual starvation, +because more than half our farms are mortgaged or occupied by tenants, +and some ten or twenty per cent of our workers are out of jobs all the +time. + +Some of our women know about birth control. They are the rich women, who +get what they want in this world. They object to the humiliations and +inconveniences of child bearing, and some of them raise one or two +children, and others of them raise poodle dogs. Also, our middle classes +have found out; our doctors and lawyers and college professors, and +people of that sort. But we deliberately keep the knowledge from our +foreign populations, by the terrors which the church has at its command. +And what is the practical consequence of this procedure? It is that +while all our Anglo-Saxon stock, those who founded our country and +established its institutions, are gradually removing themselves from the +face of the earth, our ignorant and helpless populations, whether in +city slums or on tenant farms, are multiplying like rabbits. Read Jack +London's "The Valley of the Moon" and see what is happening in +California. You will find the same thing happening in any portion of the +United States where you take the trouble to use your own eyes. + +Now, I try to repress such impulses toward race prejudice as I find in +myself. I am willing to admit for the sake of this argument that in the +course of time all the races that are now swarming in America, +Portuguese and Japanese and Mexican and French-Canadian and Polish and +Hungarian and Slovakian, are capable of just as high intellectual +development as our ancestors who wrote the Declaration of Independence. +But no one who sees the conditions under which they now live can deny +that it will take a good deal of labor, teaching them and training them, +as well as scrubbing them, to accomplish that result. And what a waste +of energy, what a farce it makes of culture, to take the people who have +already been scrubbed and taught and trained for self-government, and +exterminate them, and raise up others in their place! It seems time that +we gave thought to the fundamental question, whether or not there is +something self-destroying in the very process of culture. Unless we can +answer this we might as well give up our visions and our efforts to lift +the race. + +Theodore Roosevelt stormed at birth control for something like ten +years, and it would be interesting if we could know how many Anglo-Saxon +babies he succeeded in bringing into the world by his preachments. If +what he wanted was to correct the balance between native and foreign +births, how much more sensible to have taught birth control to those +poor, pathetic, half-starved and overworked foreign mothers of our slums +and tenant farms! I can wager that for every Anglo-Saxon baby that +Theodore Roosevelt brought into the world by his preachings, he could +have kept out ten thousand foreign slum babies, if only he had lent his +aid to Margaret Sanger! + +Ah, but he wanted all the babies to be born, you say! I see before me +the face of a certain devout old Christian lady, known to me, who +settles the question by the Bible quotation, "Be fruitful and multiply." +But what avails it to follow this biblical advice, if we allow one out +of five of the new-born infants to perish from lack of scientific care +before they are two years old? What avails it if we send them to school +hungry, as we do twenty-two per cent of the public school children of +New York City? What avails it if we allow venereal disease to spread, so +that a large percentage of the babies are deformed and miserable? What +avails it if, when they are fully grown, we can think of nothing better +to do with them than to take them by millions at a time and dress them +up in uniforms and send them out to be destroyed by poison gases? Would +it not be the part of common sense to establish universal birth control +for at least a year or two--until we have learned to take care of our +newly born babies, and to feed our school children, and to protect our +youths from vice, and to abolish poverty and war from the earth? + +These are the social aspects of birth control. There are also to be +considered what I might call the personal aspects of it. Because young +people do not know about it, and have no way to find out about it, they +dare not marry, and so the amount of vice in the world is increased. +Because married women do not know about it, love is turned to terror, +and marital happiness is wrecked. Because the harmless and proper +methods are not sensibly taught, people use harmful methods, which cause +nervous disorders, and wreck marital happiness, and break up homes. +Thorough and sound knowledge about birth control is just as essential to +happiness in marriage as knowledge of diet is necessary to health, or as +knowledge of economics is necessary to intelligent action as a voter and +citizen. The suppression by law of knowledge of birth control is just as +grave a crime against human life as ever was committed by religious +bigotry in the blackest days of the Spanish Inquisition. + +Now this law stands on the statute books of our country, and if I should +so much as hint to you in this book what you need to know, or even where +you can find out about it, I should be liable to five years in jail and +a fine of $5,000, and every person who mailed a copy of this book, or +any advertisement of this book, would be in the same plight. But there +is not yet a law to prohibit agitation against the law, so the first +thing I say to every reader of this book is that they should obtain a +copy of the _Birth Control Review_, published at 104 Fifth Avenue, New +York, and also should join the Voluntary Parenthood League, 206 +Broadway, New York. Get the literature of these organizations and +circulate them and help spread the light! + +As to the knowledge which you need, the only advice I am allowed to give +is that you should seek it. Seek it, and persist in seeking, until you +find it. Ask everyone you know; and ask particularly among enlightened +people, those who are willing to face the facts of human life and trust +in reason and common sense. I do not know if I am violating the law in +thus telling you how to find out about birth control. One of the +charming features of this law, and others against the spreading of +knowledge, is that they will never tell you in advance what you may say, +but leave you to say it and take your chances! I believe that I am not +violating any law when I tell you that there are half a dozen simple, +inexpensive, and entirely harmless methods of preventing undesired +parenthood without the destruction of the marital relationship. + +I am one of those who for many years believed that the destruction of +the marital relationship was the only proper and moral method. I was +brought up to take the monkish view of love. I thought it was an animal +thing which required some outside justification. I had been taught +nothing else; but now I have had personal experience of other +justifications of love, and I believe that love is a beautiful and +joyful relationship, which not merely requires no other justification, +but confers justification upon many other things in life. + +I used to believe in that old ideal of celibacy, thinking it a fine +spiritual exercise. But since then I have looked out on life, and have +found so many interesting things to do, so much important work calling +for attention, that I do not have to invent any artificial exercises for +my spirit. I have looked at humanity, and brought myself to recognize +the plain common sense fact--that whatever superfluous energy I may have +to waste upon artificial spirituality, the great mass of the people have +no such energy to spare. They need all their energies to get a living +for themselves and for their wives and little ones. They have their sex +impulses, and will follow them, and the only question is, shall they +follow them wisely or unwisely? The religious people decide that sexual +indulgence is wrong, and they impose a penalty--and what is that +penalty? A poor, unwanted little waif of a soul, which never sinned, and +had nothing to do with the matter, is brought into a hostile world, to +suffer neglect, and perhaps starvation--in order to punish parents who +did not happen to be sufficiently strong willed to practice continence +in marriage! + +I used to believe that there was benefit to health and increase of +power, whether physical or mental, in the celibate life. I have tried +both ways of life, and as a result I know that that old idea is +nonsense. I know now that love is a natural function. Of course, like +any other function it can be abused; just as hunger may become gluttony, +sleeping may become sluggishness, getting the money to pay one's way +through life may become ferocious avarice. But we do not on this account +refuse ever to eat or sleep or get money to pay our debts. I do not say +that I believe, I say I know, that free and happy love, guided by wisdom +and sound knowledge, is not merely conducive to health, but is in the +long run necessary to health. + +People who condemn birth control always argue as if one wished to teach +this knowledge indiscriminately to the young. Perhaps it is natural that +those who oppose the use of reason should assume that others are as +irrational as themselves. All I can say is that I no more believe in +teaching birth control to the young than I believe in feeding beefsteak +to nursing infants. There is a period in life for beefsteaks--or, if my +vegetarian friends prefer, for lentil hash and peanut butter sandwiches; +in exactly the same way there is a time for teaching the fundamentals of +sex, and another time for teaching the art of happiness in marriage, +which includes birth control. That brings me, by a very pleasant +transition, to the other two subjects which I have promised to discuss: +early marriage and education for marriage. + + + + +CHAPTER XL + +EARLY MARRIAGE + + (Discusses love marriages, how they can be made, and the duty of + parents in respect to them.) + + +I have shown how economic forces in our society make for later and later +marriage; and at the present time economic forces are so overwhelming +that all other forces are hardly worth mentioning in comparison. You +are, let us say, the mother of a boy of eighteen, and you have what you +call "common sense"--meaning thereby a grasp of the money facts of life. +If your darling boy of eighteen should come to you with a grave face and +announce, "Mother dear, I have met the girl I love, and we have decided +that we want to get married"--you would consider that the most absurd +thing you had ever heard in all your born days, and you would tell the +lad that he was a baby, and to run along and play. If he persisted in +his crazy notion, you and your husband and all the brothers and sisters +and relatives and friends both of the boy and the girl would set to +work, by scolding and ridiculing, to make life a misery for them, and +ninety-nine times out of a hundred you would break down the young +couple's marital intention. + +But now, let us try another supposition. Let us suppose that your +darling boy of eighteen should come to you again and say, "Mother dear, +some of the boys are going to spend this evening in a brothel, and I +have decided to go along." Would you think that was the most absurd +thing you had ever heard in all your born days? Or would you answer, +"Yes, of course, my boy; that is what I had in mind when I made you give +up the girl you loved"? No, you would not answer that. But here is the +vital fact--it doesn't matter what you would answer, for you would never +have a chance to answer. When a mother's darling wants to get married, +he comes and asks his mother's blessing; but never does a mother's +darling ask a blessing before he goes with the other boys to a brothel. +He just goes. Maybe he borrows the money from some other fellow, and +next day tells you he went to a theater. Or maybe he picks up some poor +man's daughter on the street, and takes her into the park, or up on the +roof of a tenement. Some such thing he does, to find satisfaction for an +instinct which you in your worldly wisdom or your heavenly piety spurn +and ridicule. + +I do not wish to exaggerate. If you are an exceptionally wise and +tactful mother, you may keep the confidence of your boy, and guide him +day by day through his temptations and miseries, and keep him chaste. +But the more you try that, the more apt you will be to come to my +conclusion, that late marriage is a crime against the race; the more +aware you will be of the danger, either that his boy friends may break +him down, or that some lewd woman may come to his bedroom in the +night-time. Never will you be able to be quite sure that he is not lying +to you, because of his shame, and the pain he cannot bear to inflict +upon you. Never will you be quite sure that he is not hiding some cruel +disease, sneaking off to some quack who takes his money and leaves him +worse than before--until finally he shoots off his head, as happened to +a nephew of an old and dear friend of mine. + +Such is the problem of the mother of a son; and now, what about the +mother of a daughter? This seems much simpler; because your daughter is +not generally troubled with sex cravings, and if you teach her the +proprieties, and see that she is carefully chaperoned, you may +reasonably hope that she will be chaste. But some day you expect that +she will marry; and then comes your problem. If you are the usual +mother, you are looking for some one who can maintain her in the state +of life to which she is accustomed. If a fairy prince would come along, +or a plaster saint, you would be pleased; but failing that, you will +take a successful business man, one who has made his way in the world +and secured himself a position. But turn back to the figures I gave you +a while ago. If this man is thirty years of age, there is at least a +fifty-fifty chance that he has had some venereal disease; and while the +doctors claim to cure these diseases absolutely, we must bear in mind +that doctors are human, and sometimes claim more than they perform. +Every doctor will admit, if you pin him down, that these diseases burrow +deeply into the tissues, and many times are supposed to be cured when +they are only hidden. + +Here is, in a nutshell, the problem of the mother of a daughter. If you +marry your daughter at seventeen to a lad of her own age, you have a +very good chance of marrying her to a person who is chaste. If you marry +her to a man of twenty-five, you have perhaps one chance in a hundred. +If you marry her to a man of thirty-five, you have perhaps one chance in +ten thousand. You may not like these facts; I do not like them myself; +but I have learned that facts are none the less facts on that account. + +You know the average society bud of eighteen, and her attitude to a boy +of the same age. She regards him as a child; and you think, perhaps, +that it is natural for a girl to be interested in men of thirty-five and +even forty-five. But I tell you that it is not natural, it is simply one +of the perversions of pecuniary sex. The girl is interested in such men, +because all her young life she has been carefully coached for the +marriage market; because she is dressed for it, and solemnly brought +out, and introduced to other players of this exciting game of marriage +for money, with its incredible prizes of automobiles and jewels and +palaces full of servants, and magic check-books that never grow empty. +But suppose that, instead of regarding her as a prize in a lottery, you +let her grow up naturally, and taught her the truth about herself, both +body and mind; suppose that, instead of dressing her in ways +deliberately contrived to emphasize her sex, you put her in a simple +uniform, and taught her to be honest and straightforward, instead of +mincing and coy; suppose she played athletic games with boys of her own +age, and invited them to her home, not for "jazz" dancing and stuffing +cake and candy, but for the sharing of good music and literature and +art--don't you think that maybe this girl might become interested in a +lad of her own age, and choose him with some understanding of his real +self? + +You take it for granted that young people should not marry until they +can "afford it." But stop and consider, is not this a relic of old days? +Always it takes time, and deliberate effort of the reason, to adjust our +conventions to new facts; so face this fact--marriage today does not +necessarily mean children, it may just mean love. It involves little +more expense, because the young people need cost no more together than +they cost in the separate homes of their parents. If they are children +of the poor, they are already taking care of themselves. If they are +children of the moderately well off, their parents expect to support +them while they are getting an education; and why can they not just as +well live together, and the parents of each contribute their share? Let +the parents of the boy give him, not merely what it costs to keep him at +home, but also the sums which otherwise the boy would pay to the +brothels. By this argument I do not mean that I favor keeping young +people financially dependent upon their parents. My own son is working +his own way through college, and I should be glad to see every young man +doing the same. All that I am saying is that if parents are going to +support their children while they are getting an education, they might +just as well support them married as single, instead of penalizing +matrimony by making all allowances cease at that point. + +I know a certain ardent feminist, who is all for late marriage for +women, and abhors my ideas on this subject. She wants women to get a +chance to develop their personalities; whereas I want to sacrifice them +to the frantic exigencies of the male animal! Young things of seventeen +and eighteen have no idea what they are, or what they want from life; +the mating impulse is a blind frenzy in them, and they must be taught to +control it, just as they are taught not to kill when they are angry! + +In the first place, I point out that young ladies in colleges and in +ballrooms give a lot of time and thought to sex, even though they do not +call it by that inelegant term. I very much question whether, if we +should apply our wisdom to the task of getting our young people happily +mated before we sent them off to college, we should not get a lot more +serious study out of them than we now do, with all their "fussing" and +flirting and dancing. + +Second, I am willing to make heroic moral efforts, where I see any +chance of adequate results, but I have examined the facts, and +definitely made up my mind that it is not worth while, in our present +stage of culture, to preach to the mass of men the doctrine that they +should abstain from sex experience until they are twenty-five or thirty +years of age. You may storm at them, but they only laugh at you; you may +pass laws, and try to put them in jail, but you only provide a harvest +for blackmailers and grafters. As to sacrificing the girl, my answer is +simply that I believe in love; and in this I think the girl will agree +with me, if you will let her! I have never heard any qualified person +maintain that it hurts a girl to respond to love at the age of seventeen +or eighteen; nor do I think that it hurts a boy, provided that he is +taught the virtues of moderation and self-restraint. Without these, it +will hurt him to eat; but that is no argument for starving him. As for +the question of his maturity and power to judge, we are able at present +to keep him from marrying anybody, so I think we might reasonably hope +to keep him from marrying a wanton or a slut. Certainly we might find +somebody better than the peroxide blonde he now picks up in front of the +moving picture palace. + +The question, at what ages we shall advise our young couple to have +children, is a separate one, depending upon many circumstances. First, +of course, they should not have any until they are able financially to +maintain them. As to the age at which it is physically advisable, that +is a question to be settled by physicians and physiologists. I myself +had the idea that the proper age would be when the woman had attained +her full stature; but my friend Dr. William J. Robinson sends me some +statistics from the Johns Hopkins Hospital _Bulletin_, which startle me. +This publication for January, 1922, gives the results in five hundred +childbirths, in which the mother's age was from twelve to sixteen years +inclusive. It appears that pregnancy and labor at these ages are no more +dangerous than in older women; but on the other hand, the duration of +the labor is actually shorter, and the size of the children is not +inferior. These facts are so contrary to the general impression that I +content myself with calling attention to them, and leave the commenting +to be done by feminists and others who oppose themselves to the idea of +early marriage. + + + + +CHAPTER XLI + +THE MARRIAGE CLUB + + (Discusses how parents and elders may help the young to avoid + unhappy marriages.) + + +I will make the assumption that you would like to have a trial of my +cure for prostitution. You would like to do something right here and +now, without waiting for the social revolution. Very well: I propose +that you shall find a few other parents of boys and girls who are in +revolt against our system of hidden vice, and that you will meet and +form a modern marriage club. Only you won't call it that, of course; you +will tactfully describe it as a literary society, or a social circle, or +an Epworth League. The parents who run it will know what it is for, just +as they do today; the only difference being that it will exist to +promote love matches instead of money matches. It happens that I am +myself a tactless sort of a person, not skillful at avoiding saying what +I mean. So, in this chapter, I shall content myself with setting forth +exactly what this marriage club will do, and leaving it to more clever +people to supply the necessary camouflage. + +This club will begin by correcting the most stupid of all our +educational blunders, the assumption of the necessary immaturity of the +young. Our young people nowadays have ten times as much chance to learn +and ten times as much stimulus to learn as we had; and it is a generally +safe assumption that they know much more than we think they do, and are +ready to learn every sensible and interesting thing. I am carrying on an +epistolary acquaintance with a little miss of twelve, who has read half +a dozen of my books--among the "worst" of them--and writes me letters of +grave appreciation. I have talked on Socialism to a thousand school +children, and had them question me for an hour, and heard just as worth +while questions as I have heard from an audience of bankers. Never in my +life have I talked about real things with children that I did not find +them proud to be treated seriously, and eager to show that they were +worthy of that honor. A great part of our foolishness with children is +due to the emptiness of our own heads. + +These parents will delegate one man and one woman to make a thorough +study of the sex education of the young. Of course, there is knowledge +about sex which has to be given to the very youngest child, and more and +more must be given as they grow older and ask more questions. But what I +have in mind here is that detailed and precise knowledge which must be +given to the young when they approach the period of puberty. At this age +of fourteen or fifteen the man will take each of the boys apart, and the +woman will take each of the girls, and will explain to them what they +need to know. This duty will not be trusted to parents, for parents have +an imbecile fear of talking straight to their children, and try to get +by with rubbish about bees and flowers. Let every child know that the +days of the hole-and-corner sex business is forever past, and that here +is an instructed person, who talks real American, and knows what he is +talking about, and will deal with facts, instead of with evasions. + +This club will help to educate the youngsters, and also to give them a +good time, developing both their minds and bodies, and learning to know +them thoroughly. When they are sixteen each one will have another talk, +this time about marriage and what it means; learning that it is not +merely flirtations and delicious thrills, but a business partnership, +and the deepest and best of all friendships. So when John finds that he +likes Mary best of all the girls he knows, this won't be a subject for +"kidding" and sly innuendo, and blushes and simpering on Mary's part, +but an occasion for decent and sensible talk about what each of them +really is, and what each thinks the other to be. If they think they are +in love, then there will be a council of the elder statesmen, to +consider that case, and what are the chances of happiness in that love. +This may sound forbidding, but it is exactly what is done at +present--only it is not done honestly and frankly, and therefore does +not carry proper weight with the young people. + +I am an opponent of long engagements, but I am also an opponent of no +engagements at all; I know no truer proverb than "Marry in haste and +repent at leisure." It would be my idea that a very young couple should +announce their engagement, and then wait six months, and be consulted +again about the matter, and have a chance to withdraw with no hard +feelings, if either party thought best. If they wished to go on, they +might be asked to wait another six months, if their elders felt very +certain there were reasons to doubt the wisdom of the match. + +There are, of course, people who, because of disease or physical defect, +should never be allowed to marry; and others who might marry, but should +not be allowed to have children. There should be laws providing for such +cases, requiring physical examination before marriage, and in extreme +cases providing for a simple and harmless surgical operation to prevent +the hopelessly unfit from passing on their defects to the future. But +dealing for the moment with normal young persons, members of our modern +marriage club, I should say that if, after they have listened to the +warning of their elders, and have waited for a decent interval to think +things over, they still remain of the opinion that they can make a +successful marriage, then it is up to the elders to wish them luck. I +have known of young couples who have refused to heed warnings, and +regretted it; but I have known of others who went ahead and had their +own way and proved they were right. There is a form of wisdom called +experience and there is another form called love. + +I hear the worldly and cynical rail at the blindness of "young love," +and I can see the truth in what they say; but also I can see the deeper +truth in the magic dreams of the young soul. Here is a youth who adores +a girl, and you know the girl, and it is comical to you, because you +know she is not any of the things the youth imagines. But who are you +that claim to know the last thing about a human soul? Look into your +own, and see how many different things you are! Look back, if you can, +to the time when you were young, and remember the visions and the hopes. +They have lost all reality to you now; but who can say how many of them +you might have made real if there had been one other person who believed +in them, and loved them, and would not give them up? + +I write this; and then I think of the other side--the fools that I have +known in love! The trusting women, marrying rotten men to reform them! +The pitiful people who think that fine phrases and sentimentality can +take the place of facts! I implore my young couples to sit down and +face the realities of their own natures, to decide what they are, and +what they want to be--and if there is going to be any change, let it be +made and tried out before marriage! I implore them to begin now to +control their desires by their reason and judgment; to begin, each of +them at the very outset, to carry their share of the burdens and do +their share of the hard work. I implore them to value independence and +self-reliance in the other, and never above all things to marry from +pity, which is a worthy emotion in its place, but has nothing to do with +sex, which should be an affair between equals, a matter of partnership +and not of parasitism. I think that, on the whole, the most dreadful +thing in love is the use of it for preying, for the securing of favors +and advantages of any sort, whether by men or by women. + + + + +CHAPTER XLII + +EDUCATION FOR MARRIAGE + + (Maintains that the art of love can be taught, and that we have the + right and the duty to teach it.) + + +I assume now that our young couple have definitely made up their minds, +and that the wedding day is near. They are therefore, both the man and +the woman, in position to receive information as to the physical aspects +of their future experience. This information is now for the most part +possessed only by pathologists--who impart it too late, after people +have blundered and wrecked their lives. The opponents of birth control +ask in horror if you would teach it to the young; I am now able to +answer just when I would teach it; I would teach it to these young +couples about to marry. I would make it by law compulsory for every +young couple to attend a school of marriage, and to learn, not merely +the regulation of conception, but the whole art of health and happiness +in sex. + +Perhaps the words, "a school of marriage," strike you as funny. When I +was young I remember that Pulitzer founded a school of journalism, and +all newspaper editors made merry--they knew that journalism could only +be learned in practice. But nowadays every city editor gives preference +to an applicant who has taken a college course in reporting; they have +learned that journalism can be taught, just like engineering and +accounting. In the same way I assert that marriage can be taught, and +the art of love, physical, mental, moral, and even financial; I think +that the day will come when enlightened parents would no more dream of +trusting their tender young daughter to a man who had not taken a course +in sex, than they would go up in an aeroplane with a pilot who knew +nothing about an engine. + +The knowledge which I possess upon the art of love I would be glad to +give you in this book; but unfortunately, if I were to do so, my book +would be suppressed, and I should be sent to jail. + +Some ten or twelve years ago I received a pitiful letter from a man who +was in state's prison in Delaware, charged with having imparted +information as to birth control. Under our amiable legal system, a +perfectly innocent man may be thrown into jail, and kept there for a +year or two before he is tried, and if he is without money or friends, +he might as well be buried alive. I went to Wilmington to call on the +United States attorney who had caused the indictment in this case, and +had an illuminating conversation with him. The official was anxious to +justify what he had done. He assured me that he was no bigot, but on the +contrary an extremely liberal man, a Unitarian, a Progressive, etc. "But +Mr. Sinclair," he said, "I assure you this prisoner is not a reformer or +humanitarian or anything like that. He is a depraved person. Look, here +is something we found in his trunk when we arrested him; a pamphlet, +explaining about sex relations. See this paragraph--it says that the +pleasure of intercourse is increased if it is prolonged." + +I looked at the pamphlet, and then I looked at the attorney. "Do you +think you have stated the matter quite fairly?" I asked. "Apparently the +purpose is to explain that the emotions of women are more slow to be +aroused than those of men, and that husbands failing to realize this, +often do not gratify their wives." + +"Well," said the other, "do you consider that a subject to be +discussed?" + +"Pardon me if I discuss it just a moment," I replied. "Do you happen to +know whether the statement is a fact?" + +"No, I don't. It may be, I suppose." + +"You have never investigated the matter?" + +The legal representative of our government was evidently annoyed by my +persistence. "I have not," he answered. + +"But then, suppose I were to tell you that thousands of homes have been +broken up for lack of just that bit of knowledge; that tens of thousands +of marriages are miserable for lack of it." + +"Surely, Mr. Sinclair, you exaggerate!" + +"Not at all. I could prove to you by one medical authority after +another, that if the desire of a woman in marriage is roused, and then +left ungratified, the result is nervous strain, and in the long run it +may be nervous breakdown." + +The above covers only one detail of the pamphlet in question. I read +some pages of it, and argued them out with the attorney. It was a +perfectly simple, straightforward exposition of facts about the +physiology of sex; and one of the reasons a man was to be sent to jail +for several years was--not that he had circulated such a pamphlet, not +that he had showed it to young people, but merely that he had it in his +trunk! + +There is an honest and very useful book, written by an English +physician, Dr. Marie C. Stopes, entitled "Married Love," published by +Dr. Wm. J. Robinson of New York, a specialist of authority and +integrity. The book deals with just such vital facts in a perfectly +dignified and straightforward manner; yet Dr. Robinson has been hounded +by the postoffice department because of it; he was convicted and forced +to pay a fine of $250, and the book was barred from the mails! + +I have so much else of importance to say in this Book of Love that it +would not be sensible to jeopardize it by causing a controversy with our +official censors of knowledge. Therefore I will merely say in general +terms that men and women differ, not merely as a sex, but as +individuals, and every marriage is a separate problem. Every couple has +to solve it in the intimacy of their love life, and for this there are +needed, first of all, gentleness on the part of the man, especially in +the first days of the honeymoon; and on the part of both at all times +consideration for the other's welfare and enjoyment, and above all, +frankness and honesty in talking out the subject. Reticence and shyness +may be virtues elsewhere, but they have no place in the intimacies of +the sex life; if men and women will only ask and answer frankly, they +can find out by experience what makes the other happy, and what causes +pain. + +We are dealing here with the most sacred intimacy of life, and one of +the most vital of life's problems. It is here, in the marriage bed, that +the divorce problem is to be settled, and likewise the problem of +prostitution; for it is when men and women fail to understand each +other, and to gratify each other, that one or the other turns cold and +indifferent, perhaps angry and hateful--and then we have passions +unsatisfied, and ranging the world, breaking up other homes and +spreading disease. So I would say to every young couple, seek knowledge +on this subject. Seek it without shame from others who have had a chance +to acquire it. Seek it also from nature, our wise old mother, who knows +so much about her children! + +Be natural; be simple and straightforward; and beware of fool notions +about sex. If you will look in the code of Hammurabi, which is over four +thousand years old, you will see the provision that a man who has +intercourse with a menstruating woman shall be killed. In Leviticus you +will read that both the man and the woman are to be cast out from their +people. You will find that most people still have some such notion, +which is without any basis whatever in health. And this is only one +illustration of many I might give of ignorance and superstition in the +sex life. I would give this as one very good rule to bear in mind; your +love life exists for the happiness and health of yourself and your +partner, and not for Hammurabi, nor Moses, nor Jehovah, nor your +mother-in-law, nor anybody else on the earth or above it. + +Great numbers of people believe that women are naturally less passionate +than men, and that marital happiness depends upon men's recognizing +this. Of course, there are defective individuals, both men and women; +but the normal woman is every bit as passionate as a man, if once she +has been taught; and if love is given its proper place in life, and +monkish notions not allowed to interfere, she will remain so all through +life, in spite of child-bearing or anything else. I say to married +couples that they should devote themselves to making and preserving +passionate gratification in love; because this is the bright jewel in +the crown of marriage, and if lovers solve this problem, they will find +other problems comparatively simple. + + + + +CHAPTER XLIII + +THE MONEY SIDE OF MARRIAGE + + (Deals with the practical side of the life partnership of + matrimony.) + + +So far we have discussed marriage as if it consisted only of love. But +it is manifest that this is not the case. Marriage is every-day +companionship, and also it is partnership in a complicated business. In +our school of marriage therefore we shall teach the rights and duties of +both partners to the contract, and shall face frankly the money side of +the enterprise. + +One of the first facts we must get clear is that the economics of +marriage are in most parts of the world still based upon the subjection +of woman, and are therefore incompatible with the claims of woman as a +partner and comrade. They will never be right until the social +revolution has abolished privilege, and the state has granted to every +woman a maternity endowment, with a mother's pension for every child +during the entire period of the rearing and education of that child. +Until this is done, the average woman must look to some man for the +support of her child, and that, by the automatic operation of economic +force, makes her subject to the whims of the man. What women have to do +is to agitate for a revision of the property laws of marriage; and +meantime to see that in every marriage there is an extra-legal +understanding, which grants to the woman the equality which laws and +conventions deny her. + +When I was a boy my mother had a woman friend who, if she wanted to go +downtown, would borrow a quarter from my mother. This woman's husband +was earning a generous salary, enough to enable him to buy the best +cigars by the box, and to keep a supply of liquors always on hand; but +he gave his wife no allowance, and if she wanted pocket money she had to +ask him for it, each time a separate favor. Yet this woman was keeping a +home, she was doing just as hard work and just as necessary work as the +man. Manifestly, this was a preposterous arrangement. If a woman is +going to be a home-maker for a husband, it is a simple, common-sense +proposition that the salary of the husband shall be divided into three +parts--first, the part which goes to the home, the benefit of which is +shared in common; second, the part which the husband has for his own +use; and third, the part which the wife has for hers. The second and +third parts should be equal, and the wife should have hers, not as a +favor, but as a right. If the two are making a homestead, or running a +farm, or building up a business, then half the proceeds should be the +woman's; and it should be legally in her name, and this as a matter of +course, as any other business contract. If the woman does not make a +home, but merely displays fine clothes at tea parties, that is of course +another matter. Just what she is to do is something that had better be +determined before marriage; and if a man wants a life-partner, to take +an interest in his work, or to have a useful work of her own, he had +better choose that kind of woman, and not merely one that has a pretty +face and a trim ankle. + +The business side of marriage is something that has to be talked out +from time to time; there have to be meetings of the board of directors, +and at these meetings there ought to be courtesy and kindness, but also +plain facts and common sense, and no shirking of issues. Love is such a +very precious thing that any man or woman ought to be willing to make +money sacrifices to preserve it. But on the other hand, it is a fact +that there are some people with whom you cannot be generous; the more +you give them, the more they take, and with such people the only safe +rule is exact justice. Let married couples decide exactly what +contribution each makes to the family life, and what share of money and +authority each is entitled to. + +I might spend several chapters discussing the various rocks on which I +have seen marriages go to wreck. For example, extravagance and worldly +show; clothes for women. In Paris is a "demi-monde," a world of brutal +lust combined with riotous luxury. The women of this "half-world" are in +touch with the world of art and fashion, and when the rich costumers and +woman-decorators want what they call ideas, it is to these lust-women +they go. The fashions they design are always depraved, of course; always +for the flaunting of sex, never for the suggestion of dignity and grave +intelligence. At several seasons of the year these lust-women are +decked out and paraded at the race-courses and other gathering places +of the rich, and their pictures are published in the papers and spread +over all the world. So forthwith it becomes necessary for your wife in +Oshkosh or Kalamazoo to throw away all the perfectly good clothes she +owns, and get a complete new outfit--because "they" are wearing +something different. Of course the costume-makers have seen that it is +extremely different, so as to make it impossible for your wife and +children to be happy in their last season's clothes. I have a winter +overcoat which I bought fourteen years ago, and as it is still as good +as new I expect to use it another fourteen years, which will mean that +it has cost me a dollar and a half per year. But think what it would +have cost me if I had considered it necessary each year to have an +overcoat cut as the keepers of French mistresses were cutting theirs! + +But then, suppose you put it up to your wife and daughters to wear +sensible clothes, and they do so, and then they observe that on the +street your eyes turn to follow the ladies in the latest disappearing +skirt? The point is, you perceive, that you yourself are partly to blame +for the fashions. They appeal to a dirty little imp you have in your own +heart, and when the decent women discover that, it makes them blazing +hot, and that is one of the ways you may wreck your domestic happiness +if you want to. Unless I am greatly mistaken, when the class war is all +over we are going to see in our world a sex war; but it is not going to +be between the men and the women, it is going to be between the mother +women and the mistress women, and the mistress women are going to have +their hides stripped off. + +Men wreck marriage because they are promiscuous; and women wreck it +because they are parasites. Woman has been for long centuries an +economic inferior, and she has the vices of the subject peoples and +tribes. Now there are some who want to keep these vices, while at the +same time claiming the new privileges which go with equality. Such a +woman picks out a man who is sensitive and chivalrous; who knows that +women suffer handicaps, pains of childbirth, physical weakness, and who +therefore feels impelled to bear more than his share of the burdens. She +makes him her slave; and by and by she gets a child, and then she has +him, because he is bowed down with awe and worship, he thinks that such +a miracle has never happened in the world before, and he spends the rest +of his life waiting on her whims and nursing her vanities. I note that +at the recent convention of the Woman's Party they demanded their rights +and agreed to surrender their privileges. There you have the final test +by which you may know that women really want to be free, and are +prepared to take the responsibilities of freedom. + + + + +CHAPTER XLIV + +THE DEFENSE OF MONOGAMY + + (Discusses the permanence of love, and why we should endeavor to + preserve it.) + + +So far in this discussion we have assumed that love means monogamous +love. We did so, for the reason that we could not consider every +question at once. But we have promised to deal with all the problems of +sex in the light of reason; and so we have now to take up the question, +what are the sanctions of monogamy, and why do we refuse sanction to +other kinds of love? + +First, let us set aside several reasons with which we have nothing to +do. For example, the reason of tradition. It is a fact that Anglo-Saxon +civilization has always refused legal recognition to non-monogamous +marriage. But then, Anglo-Saxon civilization has recognized war, and +slavery, and speculation, and private property in land, and many other +things which we presume to describe as crimes. If tradition cannot +justify itself to our reason, we shall choose martyrdom. + +Second, the religious reason. This is the one that most people give. It +is convenient, because it saves the need of thinking. Suffice it here to +say that we prefer to think. If we cannot justify monogamy by the facts +of life, we shall declare ourselves for polygamy. + +What are the scientific and rational reasons for monogamy? First among +them is venereal disease. This may seem like a vulgar reason, but no one +can deny that it is real. There was a time, apparently, when mankind did +not suffer from these plagues, and we hope there may be such a time +again. I shall not attempt to prescribe the marital customs for the +people of that happy age; I suspect that they will be able to take care +of themselves. Confining myself to my lifetime and yours, I say that the +aim of every sensible man and woman must be to confine sex relations to +the smallest possible limits. I know, of course, that there are +prophylactics, and the army and navy present statistics to show that +they succeed in a great proportion of cases. But if you are one of +those persons in whose case they don't succeed, you will find the +statistics a cold source of comfort to you. + +John and Mary go to the altar, or to the justice of the peace, and John +says: "With all my worldly goods I thee endow." But the formula is +incomplete; it ought to read: "And likewise with the fruits of my wild +oats." Marriage is a contract wherein each of the contracting parties +agrees to share whatever pathogenic bacteria the other party may have or +acquire; surely, therefore, the contract involves a right of each party +to have a say as to how many chances of infection the other shall incur. +John goes off on a business trip, and is lonesome, and meets an +agreeable widow, and figures to himself that there is very little chance +that so charming a person can be dangerous. But maybe Mary wouldn't +agree with his calculations; maybe Mary would not consider it a part of +the marriage bargain that she should take the diseases of the agreeable +widow. What commonly happens is that Mary is not consulted; John revises +the contract in secret, making it read that Mary shall take a chance at +the diseases of the widow. How can any thinking person deny that John +has thus committed an act of treason to Mary? + +I know that there are people who don't mind running such chances; that +is one reason why there are venereal diseases. All I can say is that the +sex-code set forth in this book is based upon the idea that to deliver +mankind from the venereal plague, we wish to confine the sex +relationship within the narrowest limits consistent with health, +happiness and spiritual development; and that to this end we take the +young and teach them chastity, and we marry them early while they are +clean, and then we call upon them to make the utmost effort to make a +success of that union, and to make it a matter of honor to keep the +marital faith. We do this with some hope of effectiveness, because we +have made our program consistent with the requirements of nature, the +genuine needs of love both physical and spiritual. + +The second argument for monogamy is the economic one. We have dreamed a +social order where every child will be guaranteed maintenance by the +state, and where women will be free from dependence on men. What will be +the love arrangements of men and women under this new order is another +problem which we leave for them to decide, in the certainty that they +will know more about it than we do. Meantime, we are for the present +under the private property régime, and have to love and marry and raise +our children accordingly. The children must have homes, and if they are +to be normal children, they must have both the male and female influence +in their lives; which means that their parents must be friends and +partners, not quarreling in secret. This argument, I know, is one of +expediency. I have adopted it, after watching a great number of people +try other than monogamous sex arrangements, and seeing their chances of +happiness and success wrecked by the pressure of economic forces. To +rebel against social compulsion may be heroism, and again it may be +merely bad judgment. For my part, the world's greatest evil is poverty, +the cause of crime, prostitution and war. I concentrate my energies upon +the abolishing of that evil, and I let other problems wait. + +The third reason is that monogamy is economical of human time and +thought. The business of finding and wooing a mate takes a lot of +energy, and adjustment after marriage takes more. To throw away the +results of this labor and do it all over again is certainly not common +sense. Of course, if you bake a cake and burn it, you have to get more +material and make another try; but that is a different matter from +baking a cake with the deliberate intention of throwing it away after a +bite or two. + +The advocates of varietism in love will here declare that we are begging +the question. We are assuming that love and the love chase are not +worthy in themselves, but merely means to some other end. Can it be that +love delights are the keenest and most intense that humans can +experience, and that all other purposes of life are contributory to +them? Certainly a great deal of art lends support to this idea, and many +poets have backed up their words by their deeds. As Coleridge phrased +it: + + "All thoughts, all passions, all delights, + Whatever stirs this mortal frame, + All are but ministers of Love + And feed his sacred flame." + +This is a question not to be played with. Experimenting in love is +costly, and millions have wrecked their lives by it. The sex urge in us +is imperious and cruel; it wants nothing less than the whole of us, +body, mind and spirit, and ofttimes it behaves like the genii in the +bottle--it gets out, and not all the powers in the universe can get it +back. I have talked with many men about sex and heard them say that it +presents itself to them as an unmitigated torment, something they would +give everything they own to be free of. And these, mind you, not men +living in monasteries, trying to repress their natural impulses, but men +of the world, who have lived freely, seeking pleasure and taking it as +it came. The primrose path of dalliance did not lead them to peace, and +the pursuit of variety in love brought them only monotony. + +I stop and think of one after another of these sex-ridden people, and I +cannot think of one whom I would envy. I know one who in a frenzy of +unhappiness seized a razor and castrated himself. I think of another, a +certain classmate in college whom I once stopped in a conversation, +remarking: "Did you ever realize what a state you have got your mind +into? Everything means sex to you. Every phrase you hear, every idea +that is suggested--you try to make some sort of pun, to connect it +somehow or other with sex." The man thought and said, "I guess that's +true." The idea had never occurred to him before; he had just gone on +letting his instincts have their way with him, without ever putting his +reason upon the matter. + +That was a crude kind of sex; but I think of another man, an idealist +and champion of human liberty. One of the forms of liberty he maintained +was the right to love as many women as he pleased, and although he was a +married man, one hardly ever saw him that he was not courting some young +girl. As a result, his mental powers declined, and he did little but +talk about ideas. I do not know anyone today who respects him--except a +few people who live the same sort of life. The thought of him brings to +my mind a sentence of Nietzsche--a man who surely stood for freedom of +personality: "I pity the lovers who have nothing higher than their +love." + +A question like this can be decided only by the experience of the race. +Some will make love the end and aim of life, and others will make it the +means to other ends, and we shall see which kind of people achieve the +best results, which kind are the most useful, the most dignified, the +most original and vital. I have seen a great many young people try the +experiment of "free love," and I have seen some get enough of it and +quit; I could name among these half a dozen of our younger novelists. I +know others who are still in it--and I watch their lives and find them +to be restless, jealous, egotistical and idle. My defense of monogamy is +based upon the fact that I have never known any happy or successful +"free lovers." Of course, I know some noble and sincere people who do +not believe in the marriage contract, and refuse to be bound by law; but +these people are as monogamous as I am, even more tightly bound by honor +than if they were duly married. + +It seems to be in the very nature of true and sincere love to imagine +permanence, to desire it and to pledge it. If you aren't that much in +love, you aren't really in love at all, and you had better content +yourself with strolling together and chatting together and dining +together and playing music together. So many pleasant ways there are in +which men and women can enjoy each other's company without entering upon +the sacred intimacy of sex! You can learn to take sex lightly, of +course, but if you do so, you reduce by so much the chances that true +and deep love will ever come to you; for true and deep love requires +some patience, some reverence, some tending at a shrine. The animals +mate quickly and get it over with; but the great discoveries about love, +and the possibilities of the human soul in love, have come because men +and women have been willing to make sacrifices for it, to take it +seriously--and more especially to take seriously the beloved person, the +rights and needs and virtues of that person. From the lives of such we +learn that love is nature's device for taking us out of ourselves, and +making us truly social creatures. + +Early in my life as a writer I undertook to answer Gertrude Atherton, in +her glorification of the sex-corruptions of capitalist society. She +indicted American literature for its "bourgeois" qualities--among these +the fact that American authors had a prejudice in favor of living with +their own wives. Mrs. Atherton set forth the joys of sex promiscuity as +they are understood by European artists, and I ventured in replying to +remark that "one woman can be more to a man than a dozen can possibly +be." That sounds like a paradox, but it is really a profound truth, and +the person who does not understand it has missed the best there is in +the sex relation. There is a limit to the things of the body, but to +those of the mind and spirit there is no limit, and so there is no +reason why true love should ever fall prey to boredom and satiety. + + + + +CHAPTER XLV + +THE PROBLEM OF JEALOUSY + + (Discusses the question, to what extent one person may hold another + to the pledge of love.) + + +Once upon a time I knew an Anarchist shoemaker, the same who had me sent +to jail for playing tennis on Sunday, as I have narrated in "The Brass +Check." I remember arguing with him concerning his ideas of sex, which +were of the freest. I can hear the very tones of his voice as he put the +great unanswerable question: "What are you going to do about the problem +of jealousy?" And I had no response at hand; for jealousy is truly a +most cruel and devastating and unlovely emotion; and yet, how can you +escape it, if you are going to preserve monogamy? + +The Anarchist shoemaker's solution was to break down all the prejudices +against sexual promiscuity. Free and unlimited license was every +person's right, and for any other person to interfere was enslavement, +for any other person to criticize was superstition. But the power of +superstition is strong in the world, and the shoemaker found men +resentful of his teachings, and disposed to confiscate the rights of +their wives and daughters. Hence the shoemaker's disapproval of +jealousy. + +Other men, less purely physiological in their attitude to sex, have +wrestled with this same problem of jealousy. H. G. Wells has a novel, +"In the Days of the Comet," in which he portrays two men, both nobly and +truly in love with the same woman. One in a passion of jealousy is about +to murder the other, when a great social transformation is magically +brought about, and the would-be murderer wakes up to universal love, and +the two men nobly and lovingly share the same woman. Shelley also +dreamed this dream, inviting two women to share him. I have known others +who tried it, but never permanently. I do not say that it never has +succeeded, or that it never can succeed. In this book I am renouncing +the future--I am trying to give practical advice to people, for the +conduct of their lives here and now, and my advice on this point is +that polygamous and polyandrous experiments in modern capitalist society +cost more than they are worth. + +I once knew a certain high school teacher, who believed religiously in +every kind of freedom. When she married, she and her husband, an artist, +made a vow against jealousy; but as it worked out, this vow meant that +the wife had a steady job and took care of the husband, while he loafed +and loved other women. When finally she grew tired of it, he accused her +of being jealous; also, she had brought it down to the matter of money! +I know another woman, an Anarchist, widely known as a lecturer on sex +freedom. She laid down the general principle of unlimited personal +freedom for all, and she tried to live up to her faith. She entered into +a "free union" with a certain man, and when she discovered that he was +making love to another woman, in the presence of a friend of mine she +threw a vase of flowers at his head. You see, her general principles had +clashed with another general principle, to the effect that a person who +feels deep and strong love inevitably desires that love to endure, and +cannot but suffer to see it preyed upon and destroyed. + +Let us first consider the question, just what are the true and proper +implications of monogamous love? The Roman Catholic church advocates +"monogamy," and understands thereby that a man and woman pledge +themselves "till death do us part," and if either of them cancels this +arrangement it is adultery and mortal sin. I hope that none of my +readers understands by "monogamy" any such system of spiritual +strangulation. My own idea is rather what some churchman has +sarcastically described by the term "progressive polygamy." I believe +that a man and woman should pledge their faith in love, and should keep +that faith, and endeavor with all their best energies to make a success +of it; they should strive each to understand the other's needs, and +unselfishly to fulfill them, within the limits of fair play. But if, +after such an effort has been truly made, it becomes clear that the +union does not mean health and happiness for one of the parties, that +party has a right to withdraw from it, and for any government or church +or other power to deny that right is both folly and cruelty. + +Now, on the basis of this definition of monogamy--or, if you prefer, of +progressive polygamy--we are in position to say what we think about +jealousy. If two people pledge their faith, and one breaks it, and the +other complains, we do not call that jealousy, but just common decency. +Neither do we call it jealousy if one expects the other to avoid the +appearance of guilt; for love is a serious thing, not to be played with, +and I think that a person who truly loves will do everything possible to +make clear to the beloved that he is keeping and means to keep the +plighted faith. + +You may say that I am using words arbitrarily, in endeavoring thus to +distinguish between justifiable and unjustifiable jealousy, and calling +the former by some other name. It does not make much difference about +words, provided I make clear my meaning. I could point out a whole +string of words which have good meanings and bad meanings, and cannot be +discussed without preliminary explanations and distinctions; religion, +for example, and morality, and aristocracy, and justice, to name only a +few. Most people's thinking about marriage and love has been made like +soup in a cheap restaurant, by dumping in all kinds of scraps and +notions from such opposite poles of human thought as Christian monkery +and Renaissance license, absurdly called "romance." So before you can do +any thinking about a problem like jealousy, you have to agree to use the +word to mean something definite, whether good or bad. + +We shall take jealousy as a "bad" word, and use it to mean the setting +up, by a man or woman, of some claim to the love of another person, +which claim cannot be justified in the court of reason and fair play. +This includes, in the first place, all claims based upon a courtship, +not ratified by marriage. It is to the interest of society and the race +that men and women should be free to investigate persons of the other +sex, and to experiment with the affections before pledges of marriage +are made. If sensible customs of love and just laws of marriage were +made, there would be no excuse for a woman's giving herself to a man +before marriage; she should be taught not to do it, and then if she does +it, the risk is her own, and the disgusting perversion of venality and +greed known as the "breach of promise suit" should be unknown in our +law. The young should be taught that it is the other person's right to +change his mind and withdraw at any time before marriage; whatever pains +and pangs this may cause must be borne in silence. + +The second kind of jealousy is that which seeks to keep in the marriage +bond a person who is not happy in it and has asked to be released. The +law sanctions this kind of cowardly selfishness, which manifests itself +every day on the front pages of our newspapers--a spectacle of monstrous +and loathsome passions unleashed and even glorified. Husbands set the +bloodhounds of the law after wives who have fled with some other man, +and send the man to a cell, and drag the woman back to a loveless home. +Wives engage private detectives, and trail their husbands to some "love +nest," and then ensue long public wrangles, with washing of filthy +linen, and the matter is settled by a "separation." The virtuous wife, +who may have driven the man away by neglect or vanity or stupidity, is +granted a share of his earnings for the balance of her life; and two +more people are added to the millions who are denied sexual happiness +under the law, and are thereby impelled to live as law violators. + +For this there is only one remedy conceivable. We have banned +cannibalism and slavery and piracy and duelling, and we must ban one +more ancient and cruel form of human oppression, the effort to hold +people in the bonds of sex by any other power save that of love. I am +aware that the reactionaries who read this book will take this sentence +out of its context and quote it to prove that I am a "free lover." I +shall be sorry to have that done, but even so, I was not willing to live +in slavery myself, and I am not willing to advocate it for others. I am +aware that there are degenerate and defective individuals, and that we +have to make special provision for them, as I shall presently set forth; +but the average, normal human being must be free to decide what is love +for him, and what is happiness for him. Every person in the world will +have to deny himself the right to demand love where love is not freely +given, and all lovers in the world will have to hold themselves ready to +let the loved one go if and when the loved one demands it. I am aware +that this is a hard saying, and a hard duty, but it is one that life +lays upon us, and one that there is no escaping. + + + + +CHAPTER XLVI + +THE PROBLEM OF DIVORCE + + (Defends divorce as a protection to monogamous love, and one of the + means of preventing infidelity and prostitution.) + + +You will hear sermons and read newspaper editorials about the "divorce +evil," and you will find that to the preacher or editor this "evil" +consists of the fact that more and more people are refusing to stay +unhappily married. It does not interest these moralizers if the +statistics show that it is women who are getting most of the divorces, +and that the meaning of the phenomenon is that women are refusing to +continue living with drunken and dissolute men. To the clergy, the +breaking of a marriage is an evil _per se_, and regardless of +circumstances. They know this because God has told them so, and in the +name of God they seek to keep people tied in sex unions which have come +to mean loathing instead of love. + +Now, I will assert it as a mathematical certainty that a considerable +percentage of marriages must fail. It is essential to progress that +human beings should grow, both mentally and spiritually, and manifestly +they cannot all grow in the same way. If they grow differently, must +they not sometimes lose the power to make each other happy in the +marital bonds? Who does not know the man who masters life and becomes a +vital force, while his wife remains dull and empty? If such a man +changes wives, the world in general denounces him as a selfish beast; +but the world does not know nor does it care about those thousands of +men who, not caring to be branded as selfish beasts, fulfill the needs +of their lives by keeping mistresses in secret. + +I knew a certain country school teacher, one of the most narrowly +conventional young women imaginable, who was engaged to a middle-aged +business man. He went to New York on a business trip, and stayed a +couple of months, and wrote her that he had met some Anarchists, and had +discovered that all he had read about them in the newspapers was false, +and that they were the true and pure idealists to whom the rest of his +life must be devoted. The young lady was horrified; nor was she any +happier when she came to New York and met her fiancé's new friends. She +ought in common sense to have broken the engagement; but she was in +love, and she married, as many another fool woman does, with the idea of +"reforming" the man. She failed, and was utterly and unspeakably +wretched. + +I know another man, a conservative capitalist of narrow and aggressive +temper, whose wife turned into an ardent Bolshevik. The man thinks that +all Bolsheviks should be shut up in jail for life, while the wife is +equally certain that all jails should be razed to the ground and all +Bolsheviks placed in control of the government. These two people have +got to a point where they cannot sit down to the breakfast table without +flying into a quarrel. I know another case of a modern scientist, an +agnostic, whose wife, a half-educated, sentimental woman, took to +dabbling in mysticism, and drove him wild by setting up an image of +Buddha in her bedroom, and consorting with "swamis" in long yellow +robes. I know another whose wife turned into an ultra-pious Catholic, +and turned over the care of his domestic life to a priest. Is it not +obvious that the only possible solution of such problems lies in +divorce? Unless, indeed, we are all of us going to turn over the care of +our domestic lives to the priests! + +Our grandfathers and grandmothers believed one thing, and believed the +same thing when they were seventy as when they were twenty; so it was +possible for them to dwell in domestic security and permanence till +death did them part. But we are learning to change our minds; and +whether what we believe is better or worse than what our ancestors +believed, at least it is different. Also we are coming to take what we +believe with more seriousness; the intellectual life means more and more +to us, and it becomes harder and harder for us to find sexual and +domestic happiness with a partner who does not share our convictions, +but, on the contrary, may be contributing to the campaign funds of the +opposition party. + +I do not mean by this that people should get a divorce as soon as they +find they differ about some intellectual idea; on the contrary, I have +advocated that they should do everything possible to understand and to +tolerate each other. But it is a fact that intellectual convictions are +the raw material out of which characters and lives are made, and it is +inevitable that some characters and lives that fit quite well at twenty +should fit very badly at thirty or forty. When we refuse divorce under +such circumstances we are not fostering marriage, as we fondly imagine; +we are really fostering adultery. It is a fact that not one person in +ten who is held by legal or social force in an unhappy sex union will +refrain from seeking satisfaction outside; and because these outside +satisfactions are disgraceful, and in some cases criminal, they seldom +have any permanence. Therefore it follows that "strict" divorce laws, +such as the clerical propaganda urges upon us, are in reality laws for +the promotion of fornication and prostitution. + +There is a short story by Edith Wharton, in which the "divorce evil" is +exhibited to us in its naked horror; the story called "The Other Two," +in the volume "The Descent of Man." A society woman has been divorced +twice and married three times, and by an ingenious set of circumstances +the woman and all three of the men are brought into the same +drawing-room at the same time. Just imagine, if you can, such an +excruciating situation: a woman, her husband, and two men who used to be +her husbands, all compelled to meet together and think of something to +say! I cite this story because it is a perfect illustration of the +extent to which the "divorce problem" is a problem of our lack of sense. +Mrs. Wharton will, I fear, consider me a very vulgar person if I assert +that there is absolutely no reason whatever why any of those four people +in her story should have had a moment's discomfort of mind, except that +they thought there was. There is absolutely nothing to prevent a man and +woman who used to be married from meeting socially and being decent to +each other, or to prevent two men from being decent to each other under +such circumstances. I would not say that they should choose to be +intimate friends--though even that may be possible occasionally. + +I know, because I have seen it happen. In Holland I met a certain +eminent novelist and poet, a great and lovable man. I visited his home, +and met his wife and two little children, and saw a man and woman living +in domestic happiness. The man had also two grown sons, and after a few +days he remarked that he would like me to meet the mother of these young +men. We went for a walk of a mile or so, and met a lady who lived in a +small house by herself, and who received us with a friendly welcome and +talked with us for a couple of hours about music and books and art. This +lady had been the writer's wife for ten years or so, and there had been +a terrible uproar when they voluntarily parted. But they had refused to +pay attention to this uproar; they understood why they did not wish to +remain husband and wife any longer, but they did not consider it +necessary to quarrel about it, nor even to break off the friendship +which their common interests made possible. The two women in the case +were not intimate, I gathered, but they frequently met at the homes of +others, and found no difficulty in being friendly. I suggest to Mrs. +Wharton that this story is at least as interesting as the one she has +told; but I fear she will not care to write it, because apparently she +considers it necessary that people who are well bred and refined should +be the helpless victims of destructive manias. + + + + +CHAPTER XLVII + +THE RESTRICTION OF DIVORCE + + (Discusses the circumstances under which society has the right to + forbid divorce, or to impose limitations upon it.) + + +We have quoted the old maxim, "Marry in haste and repent at leisure," +and we suggested that parents and guardians should have the right to ask +the young to wait before marriage, and make certain of the state of +their hearts. We have now the same advice to give concerning divorce; +the same claim to enter on behalf of society--that it has and should +assert the right to ask people to delay and think carefully before +breaking up a marriage. + +What interest has society in the restriction of divorce? What affair is +it of any other person if I choose to get a divorce and marry a new wife +once a month? There are many reasons, not in any way based upon +religious superstition or conventional prejudice. In the first place, +there are or may be children, and society should try to preserve for +every child a home with a father and a mother in it. Second, there are +property rights, of which every marriage is a tangle, and the settlement +of which the law should always oversee. Third, there is the question of +venereal disease, which society has an unquestionable right to keep +down, by every reasonable restriction upon sexual promiscuity. And +finally, there is the respect which all men and women owe to love. It +seems to me that society has the same right to protect love against +extreme outrage, as it has to forbid indecent exposure of the person on +the street. + +There is in successful operation in Switzerland a wise and sane divorce +law, based upon common sense and not upon superstition. A couple wish to +break their marriage, and they go before a judge, and in private +session, as to a friendly adviser, they tell their troubles. He gives +them advice about their disagreement, and sends them away for three +months to think it over. At the end of three months, if they still +desire a divorce, they meet with him again. If he still thinks there is +a chance of reconciliation, he has the right to require them to wait +another three months. But if at the end of this second period they are +still convinced that the case is hopeless, and that they should part, +the judge is required to grant the divorce. You may note that this is +exactly what I have suggested concerning young couples who become +engaged. In both cases, the parties directly interested have the right +to decide their own fate, but the rest of the world requires them to +think carefully about it, and to listen to counsel. Except for grave +offenses, such as adultery, insanity, crime or venereal disease, I do +not think that anyone should receive a divorce in less than six months, +nor do I think that any personal right is contravened by the imposing of +such a delay. + +Next, what are we going to say to the right, or the claim to the right, +on the part of a man or woman, to be married once a year throughout a +lifetime? In order to illustrate this problem, I will tell you about a +certain man known to me. In his early life he spent a couple of years in +a lunatic asylum. He lays claim to extraordinary spiritual gifts, and +uses the language of the highest idealism known. He is a man of culture +and good family, and thus exerts a peculiar charm upon young women of +refinement and sensitiveness. To my knowledge he was three times married +in six years, and each time he deserted the woman, and forced her to +divorce him, and to take care of herself, and in one case of a child. In +addition, he had begotten one child out of marriage, and left the mother +and child to starve. For ten years or so I used to see him about once in +six months, and invariably he had a new woman, a young girl of fine +character, who had been ensnared by him, and was in the agonizing +process of discovering his moral and mental derangement. Yet there was +absolutely nothing in the law to place restraint upon this man; he could +wander from state to state, or to the other side of the world, preying +upon lovely young girls wherever he went. + +This particular man happens to call himself a "radical"; but I could +tell you of similar men in the highest social circles, or in the +political world, the theatrical world, the "sporting" world; they are in +every rank of life, and are just as definitely and certainly menaces to +human welfare and progress as pirates on the high seas or highwaymen on +the road. Nor are they confined to the males; the world is full of women +who use their sex charms for predatory purposes, and some of them are +far too clever for any law that you or I can contrive at present. But I +think we might begin by refusing to let any man or woman have more than +two divorces in one lifetime, in any state or part of the world. If any +man or woman tries three times to find happiness in love, and fails each +time, we have a right to assume that the fault must lie with that +person, and not with the three partners. + +I think we may go further yet; having made wise laws of love and +marriage, taking into consideration all human needs, we have a right to +require that men and women shall obey the laws. At present the great +mass of the public has sympathy for the law-breaker; just as, in old +days, the peasants could not help admiring the outlaw who resisted +unjust land laws and robbed the rich, or as today, under the capitalist +régime, we can not withhold our sympathy from political prisoners, even +though they have committed acts of violence which we deplore. But when +we have made sex laws that we know are just and sensible--then we shall +consider that we have the right to restrain sex criminals, and in +extreme cases we shall avail ourselves of the skill of science to +perform a surgical operation which will render him unable in future to +prey upon the love needs of people who are placed at his mercy by their +best qualities, their unselfishness and lack of suspicion. + +We clear out foul-smelling weeds from our garden, because we wish to +raise beautiful flowers and useful herbs therein. There lives in +California a student of plant life, who has shown us what we can do, not +by magic or by superhuman efforts, but simply by loving plants, by +watching them ceaselessly, understanding their ways, and guiding their +sex-life to our own purposes. We can perform what to our ignorant +ancestors would have seemed to be miracles; we can actually make all +sorts of new plants, which will continue to breed their own kind, and +survive forever if we give them proper care. In other words, Luther +Burbank has shown us that we can "change plant nature." + +There flash back upon my memory all those dull, weary, sick human +creatures, who have repeated to me that dull, weary, sick old formula, +"You cannot change human nature." I do not think I am indulging either +in religious superstition or in blind optimism, but am speaking +precisely, in saying that whenever human beings get ready to apply +experimental science to themselves, they can change human nature just as +they now change plant nature. By putting human bodies together in love, +we make new bodies of children more beautiful than any who have yet +romped on the earth; and in the same way, by putting minds and souls +together, we can make new kinds of minds and souls, different from those +we have previously known, and greater than either the man-soul or the +woman-soul alone. + +Also, by that magic which is the law of mind and soul life, each new +creation can be multiplied to infinity, and shared by all other minds +and souls that live in the present or may live in the future. We have +shown elsewhere how genius multiplies to infinity the joy and power of +life by means of the arts; and one of the greatest of the arts is the +art of love. Consider the great lovers, the true lovers, of history--how +they have enriched the lives of us all. It does not make any difference +whether these men and women lived in the flesh, or in the brain of a +poet--we learn alike from Dante and Beatrice, from Abélard and Héloïse, +from Robert and Elizabeth Browning, from Tristan and Isolde, from Romeo +and Juliet, what is the depth and the splendor of this passion which +lies hidden within us, and how it may enrich and vivify and glorify all +life. + + + + +PART FOUR + +THE BOOK OF SOCIETY + + + + +CHAPTER XLVIII + +THE EGO AND THE WORLD + + (Discusses the beginning of consciousness, in the infant and in + primitive man, and the problem of its adjustment to life.) + + +We have now to consider the relationship of man to his fellows, with +whom he lives in social groups. Upon this problem floods of light have +been thrown by the new science of psycho-analysis. I will try to give, +briefly and in simple language, an idea of these discoveries. + +One of the laws of biology is that every individual, in his development, +reproduces the history of the race; so that impulses and mental states +of a child reveal to us what our far-off ancestors loved and feared. The +same thing is discovered to be true of neurotics, people who have failed +in adjusting themselves to civilized life, and have gone back, in some +or all of their mental traits, to infantile states. If we analyze the +unconscious minds of "nervous patients," and compare them with what we +find in the minds of infants, and in savages, we discover the same +dreams, the same longings and the same fears. + +The mental life of man begins in the womb. We cannot observe that life +directly, but we know that it is there, because there cannot be organic +life without mind to direct it, and just as there is an unconscious mind +that regulates the bodily processes in adults, so in the embryo there +must be an unconscious mind to direct the flow of blood, the building of +bones, muscle, eyes and brain. The mental life of that unborn creature +is of course purely egotistical; it knows nothing outside itself, and it +finds this universe an agreeable place--everything being supplied to it, +promptly and perfectly, without effort of its own. + +But suddenly it gets its first shock; pain begins, and severe +discomfort, and the creature is shoved out into a cold world, yelling in +protest against the unsought change. And from that moment on, the +new-born infant labors to adjust itself to an entirely new set of +conditions. Discomforts trouble it, and it cries. Quickly it learns that +these cries are answered, and satisfaction of its needs is furnished. +Somehow, magically, things appear; warm and dry covering, a trickle of +delicious hot milk into its mouth. At first the infant mind has no idea +how all this happens; but gradually it comes to realize objects outside +itself, and it forms the idea that these objects exist to serve its +wants. Later on it learns that there are particular sounds which attach +to particular objects, and cause them to function. The sound "Mama," for +example, produces a goddess clothed in beauty and power, performing +miracles. So the infant mind arrives at the "period of magic gestures" +and the "period of magic words"; corresponding to a certain type of myth +and belief which we find in every race and tribe of human being that now +exists or ever has existed on earth. All these stories about magic +wishes and magic rings and magic spells of a thousand sorts; and nowhere +on earth a child which does not listen greedily to such fancies! The +reason is simply that the child has passed through this stage of mental +life, and so recently that the feelings are close to the surface of his +consciousness. + +But gradually the infant makes the painful discovery that not everything +in existence can be got to serve him; there are forces which are proof +against his magic spells; there are some which are hostile, and these +the infant learns to regard with hatred and fear. Sometimes hatred and +fear are strangely mixed with admiration and love. For example, there is +a powerful being known as "father," who is sometimes good and useful, +but at other times takes the attention of the supremely useful "mother," +the source of food and warmth and life. So "father" is hated, and in +fancy he is wished out of the way--which to the infant is the same thing +as killing. Out of this grows a whole universe of fascinating mental +life, which Freud calls by the name "the [OE]dipus complex"--after the +legend of the Greek hero who murdered his father and committed incest +with his mother, and then, when he discovered what he had done, put out +his own eyes. There is a mass of legends, old as human thought, +repeating this story; we cannot be sure whether they have grown out of +the greeds and jealousies of this early wish-life of the infant, or +whether they had their base in the fact that there was a stage in human +progress in which the father really was killed off by the sons. + +This latter idea is discussed by Freud, in his book, "Totem and Taboo." +It appears that primitive man lived in hordes, which were dominated by +one old male, who kept all the women to himself, and either killed the +young males, or drove them out to shift for themselves; so the young men +would combine and murder their father. The forming of human society, of +marriage and the family, depended upon one factor, the decision of the +young victors to live and let live. The only way they could do this was +to agree not to quarrel over the women of their own group, but to seek +other women from other groups. This may account for what is known as +"exogamy," an almost universal marriage custom of primitive man, whereby +a man named Jones is barred by frightful taboos from the women named +Jones, but is permitted relations with all the women named Smith. + +To return to our infant: he is in the midst of a painful process of +adjusting himself to the outside world; discovering that sometimes all +his magic words and gestures fail, his wishes no longer come true. There +are beings outside him, with wills of their own, and power to enforce +them; he has to learn to get along with these beings, and give up his +pleasures to theirs. These processes which go on in the infant soul, the +hopes and the terrors, the griefs and the angers, are of the profoundest +significance for the later adult life. For nothing gets out of the mind +that has once got into it; the infantile cravings which are repressed +and forgotten stay in the unconscious, and work there, and strive still +for expression. The conscious mind will not tolerate them, but they +escape in the form of fairy-tales and stories, of dreams and delusions, +slips of the tongue, and many other mental events which it is +fascinating to examine. Also, if we are weakened by ill health or +nervous strain, these infantile wishes may take the form of "neuroses," +and fully grown people may take to stammering, or become impotent, or +hysterical, or even insane, because of failures of adjustment to life +that happened when they were a year or two old. These things are known, +not merely as a matter of theory, but because, as soon as by analysis +these infant secrets are brought into consciousness and adjusted there, +the trouble instantly ceases. + +So it appears that the whole process of human life, from the very hour +of birth, consists of the correct adjustment of men and women in +relation to their fellows. Not merely is man a social being, but all the +prehuman ancestors of men, for ages upon geologic ages, have been +social beings; they have lived in groups, and their survival has +depended upon their success in fitting themselves snugly into group +relationships. Failure to make correct adjustments means punishment by +the group, or by enemies outside the group; if the failure is serious +enough, it means death. We may assert that the task of understanding +one's fellow men, and making one's self understood by them, is the most +important task that confronts every individual. + +And if we look about the world at present, the most superficial of us +cannot fail to realize that the task is far from being correctly +performed. So many people unhappy, so many striving for what they cannot +get! So many having to be locked behind bars, like savage beasts, +because they demand something which the world is resolved not to let +them have! So many having to be killed, by rifles and machine-guns, by +high explosive shells and poison gas--because they misunderstood the +social facts about them, and thought they could fulfill some wishes +which the rest of mankind wanted them to repress! As I read the +psycho-analyst's picture of the newly born infant with its primitive +ego, its magic cries and magic gestures, I cannot be sure how much of it +is sober science and how much is mordant irony--a sketch of the mental +states of the men and women I see about me--whole classes of men and +women, yes, even whole nations! + +The effort of the following chapters will be to interpret to men and +women the world which they have made, and to which they are trying to +adjust themselves. More especially we shall try to show how, by better +adjustments, men may change both themselves and the world, and make both +into something less cruel and less painful, more serene and more certain +and more free. + + + + +CHAPTER XLVIX + +COMPETITION AND CO-OPERATION + + (Discusses the relation of the adult to society, and the part which + selfishness and unselfishness play in the development of social + life.) + + +Pondering the subject of this chapter, I went for a stroll in the +country, and seating myself in a lonely place, became lost in thought; +when suddenly my eye was caught by something moving. On the bare, hot, +gray sand lay a creature that I could see when it moved and could not +see when it was still, for it was exactly the color of the ground, and +fitted the ground tightly, being flat, and having its edges scalloped so +that they mingled with the dust. It was a lizard, covered with heavy +scales, and with sharp horns to make it unattractive eating. At the +slightest motion from me it vanished into a heap of stones, so quickly +that my eye could scarcely follow it. + +This creature, you perceive, is in its actions and its very form an +expression of terror; terror of devouring enemies, of jackals that +pounce and hawks that swoop, and also of the hot desert air that seeks +to dry out its few precious drops of moisture. Practically all the +energies of this creature are concentrated upon the securing of its own +individual survival. To be sure, it will mate, but the process will be +quick, and the eggs will be left for the sun to hatch out, and the baby +lizards will shift for themselves--that is to say, they will be +incarnations of terror from the moment they open their eyes to the +light. + +The jackal seeks to pounce upon the lizard, and so inspires terror in +the lizard; but when you watch the jackal you find that it exhibits +terror toward more powerful foes. You find that the hawk, which swoops +upon the lizard, is equally quick to swoop away when it comes upon a man +with a gun. This preying and being preyed upon, this mixture of cruelty +and terror, is a conspicuous fact of nature; if you go into any orthodox +school or college in America today, you will be taught that it is +nature's most fundamental law, and governs all living things. If you +should take a course in political economy under a respectable +professor, you would find him explaining that such cruelty-terror +applies equally in human affairs; it is the basis of all economic +science, and the effort to escape from it is like the effort to lift +yourself by your boot-straps. + +The professor calls this cruelty-terror by the name "competition"; and +he creates for his own purposes an abstract being whom he names "the +economic man," a creature who acts according to this law, and exists +under these conditions. One of the professor's formulas is the so-called +"Malthusian law," that population presses always upon the limits of +subsistence. Another is "the law of diminishing returns of agriculture," +that you can get only so much product out of a certain piece of land, no +matter how much labor and capital you put into it. Another is Ricardo's +"iron law of wages," that wages cannot rise above the cost of living. +Another is embodied in the formula of Adam Smith, that "Competition is +the life of trade." The professor enunciates these "laws," coldly and +impersonally, as becomes the scientist; but if you go into the world of +business, you find them set forth cynically, in scores of maxims and +witticisms: "Dog eat dog," "the devil take the hindmost," "business is +business," "do others or they will do you." + +Evidently, however, there is something in man which rebels against these +"natural" laws. In our present society man has set aside six days in the +week in which to live under them, and one day in the week in which to +preach an entirely different and contradictory code--that of Christian +ethics, which bids you "love your neighbor," and "do unto others as you +would they should do unto you." Between these Sunday teachings and the +week-day teachings there is eternal conflict, and one who takes pleasure +in ridiculing his fellow men can find endless opportunity here. The +Sunday preachers are forbidden to interfere with the affairs of the +other six days; that is called "dragging politics into the pulpit." On +the other hand, incredible as it may seem, there are professors of the +week-day doctrine who call themselves Christians, and believe in the +Sunday doctrine, too. They manage this by putting the Sunday doctrine +off into a future world; that is, we are to pounce upon one another and +devour one another under the "iron laws" of economics so long as we live +on earth, but in the next world we shall play on golden harps and have +nothing to do but love one another. If anybody is so foolish as to apply +the Sermon on the Mount to present-day affairs, we regard him as a +harmless crank; if he persists, and sets out to teach others, we call +him a Communist or a Pacifist, and put him in jail for ten or twenty +years. + +In the Book of the Mind, I have referred to Kropotkin's "Mutual Aid as a +Factor in Evolution," which I regard as one of the epoch-making books of +our time. Kropotkin clearly proves that competition is not the only law +of nature, it is everywhere modified by co-operation, and in the great +majority of cases co-operation plays a larger part in the relations of +living creatures than competition. There is no creature in existence +which is entirely selfish; in the nature of the case such a creature +could not exist--save in the imaginations of teachers of special +privilege. If a species is to survive, some portion of the energies of +the individual must go into reproduction; and steadily, as life +advances, we find the amount of this sacrifice increasing. The higher +the type of the creature, the longer is the period of infancy, and the +greater the sacrifice of the parent for the young. Likewise, most +creatures make the discovery that by staying together in herds or +groups, and learning to co-operate instead of competing among +themselves, they increase their chances of survival. You find birds that +live in flocks, and other birds, like hawks and owls and eagles, that +are solitary; and you find the co-operating birds a thousand times as +numerous--that is to say, a thousand times as successful in the struggle +for survival. You find that all man's brain power has been a social +product; the supremacy he has won over nature has depended upon one +thing and one alone--the fact that he has managed to become different +from the "economic man," that product of the imagination of the +defenders of privilege. + +It is evident that both competition and co-operation are necessary to +every individual, and the health of the individual and of the race lies +in the proper combination of the two. If a creature were wholly +unselfish--if it made no effort to look after its own individual +welfare--it would be exterminated before it had a chance to reproduce. +If, on the other hand, it cannot learn to co-operate, its progeny stand +less chance of survival against creatures which have learned this +important lesson. We have a nation of a 110,000,000 people, who have +learned to co-operate to a certain limited extent. Some of us realize +how vastly the happiness of these millions might be increased by a +further extension of co-operation; but we find ourselves opposed by the +professors of privilege--and we wish that these gentlemen would go out +and join the lizards of the desert sands or the sharks of the sea, +creatures which really practice the system of "laissez faire" which the +professors teach. + +The plain truth is that we cannot make a formula out of either +competition or co-operation. We cannot settle any problem of economics, +of business or legislation, by proclaiming, for example, that +"Competition is the life of trade." Competition may just as well turn +out to be the death of trade; it depends entirely upon the kind of +competition, and the stage of trade development to which it is applied. +In the early eighteenth century, when that formula of Adam Smith was +written, competition was observed to keep down prices and provide +stimulus to enterprise, and so to further abundant production. But the +time came when the machinery for producing goods was in excess, not +merely of the needs of the country, but of the available foreign +markets, and then suddenly the large-scale manufacturers made the +discovery that competition was the death of trade to them. They +proceeded, as a matter of practical common sense, and without consulting +their college professors, to abolish competition by forming trusts. We +passed laws forbidding them to do this, but they simply refused to obey +the laws. In the United States they have made good their refusal for +thirty-five years, and in the end have secured the blessing of the +Supreme Court upon their course. + +So now we have co-operation in large-scale production and marketing. It +is known by various names, "pools," "syndicates," "price-fixing," +"gentlemen's agreements." It is a blessing for those who co-operate, but +it proves to be the death of those who labor, and also of those who +consume, and we see these also compelled to combine, forming labor +unions and consumers' societies. Each side to the quarrel insists that +the other side is committing a crime in refusing to compete, and our +whole social life is rent with dissensions over this issue. Manifestly, +we need to clear our minds of dead doctrines; to think out clearly just +what we mean by competition, and what by co-operation, and what is the +proper balance between the two. + +I have been at pains in this book to provide a basis for the deciding of +such questions. It is a practical problem, the fostering of human life +and the furthering of its development. We cannot lay down any fixed +rule; we have to study the facts of each case separately. We shall say, +this kind of competition is right, because it helps to protect human +life and to develop its powers. We shall say, this other kind of +competition is wrong because it has the opposite effect. We shall say, +perhaps, that some kind was right fifty years ago, or even ten years +ago, because it then had certain effects; but meantime some factor has +changed, and it is now having a different effect, and therefore ought to +be abolished. + +There has never been any kind of human competition which men did not +judge and modify in that way; there is no field of human activity in +which ethical codes do not condemn certain practices as unfair. The +average Englishman considers it proper that two men who get into a +dispute shall pull off their coats, and settle the question at issue by +pummeling each other's noses. But let one of these men strike his +opponent in the groin, or let him kick his shins, and instantly there +will be a howl of execration. Likewise, an Anglo-Saxon man who fights +with the fists has a loathing for a Sicilian or Greek or other +Mediterranean man who will pull a knife. That kind of competition is +barred among our breeds; and also the kind which consists of using +poisons, or of starting slanders against your opponent. + +If you look back through history, you find many forms of competition +which were once eminently respectable, but now have been outlawed. There +was a time, for example, when the distinction we draw between piracy and +sea-war was wholly unknown. The ships of the Vikings would go out and +raid the ships and seaports of other peoples, and carry off booty and +captives, and the men who did that were sung as heroes of the nation. +The British sea-captains of the time of Queen Elizabeth--Drake, +Frobisher, and the rest of them--are portrayed in our school books as +valiant and hardy men, and the British colonies were built on the basis +of their activities; yet, according to the sea laws in force today, they +were pirates. We regard a cannibal race with abhorrence; yet there was a +time when all the vigorous races of men were cannibals, and the habit of +eating your enemies in battle may well have given an advantage to the +races which practiced it. + +On the other hand, you find sentimental people who reject all +competition on principle, and would like to abolish every trace of it +from society, and especially from education. But stop and consider for a +moment what that would mean. Would you abolish, for example, the +competition of love, the right of a man to win the girl he wants? You +could not do it, of course; but if you could, you would abolish one of +the principal methods by which our race has been improved. Of course, +what you really want is, not to abolish competition in love, but to +raise it to a higher form. There is an old saying, "All's fair in love +and war," but no one ever meant that. You would not admit that a man +might compete in love by threatening to kill the girl if she preferred a +rival. You would not admit that he might compete by poisoning the other +man. You would not admit that he might compete by telling falsehoods +about the other man. On the other hand, if you are sensible, you admit +that he has a right to compete by making his character known to the +girl, and if the other man is a rascal, by telling the girl that. + +Would you abolish the competition of art, the effort of men to produce +work more beautiful and inspiring than has ever been known before? Would +you abolish the effort of scientists to overthrow theories which have +hitherto been accepted? Obviously not. You make these forms of +competition seem better by calling them "emulation," but you do not in +the least modify the fact that they involve the right of one person to +outdo other persons, to supplant them and take away something from them, +whether it be property or position or love or fame or power. In that +sense, competition is indeed the law of life, and you might as well +reconcile yourself to it, and learn to play your part with spirit and +good humor. + +Also, you might as well train your children to it. You will find you +cannot develop their powers to the fullest without competition; in fact, +you will be forced to go back and utilize forms of competition which are +now out of date among adults. I have told in the Book of the Body how I +myself tried for ten years or more to live without physical competition, +and discovered that I could not; I have had to take up some form of +sport, and hundreds of thousands of other men have had the same +experience. What is sport? It is a deliberate going back, under +carefully devised rules, to the savage struggles of our ancestors. The +very essence of real sport is that the contestants shall, within the +rules laid down, compete with each other to the limit of their powers. +With what contempt would a player of tennis or baseball or whist regard +the proposition that his opponent should be merciful to him, and let him +win now and then! Obviously, these things have no place in the game, and +to be a "good sport" is to conform to the rules, and take with enjoyment +whatever issue of the struggle may come. + +But then again, suppose you are competing with a child; obviously, the +conditions are different. You no longer play the best you can, you let +the child win a part of the time; but you do not let the child know +this, or it would spoil the fun for the child. You pretend to try as +hard as you know how, and you cry out in grief when you are beaten, and +the child crows with delight. And yet, that does not keep you from +loving the child, or the child from loving you. + +The purpose of this elaborate exposition is to make clear the very vital +point that a certain set of social acts may be right under some +conditions, and desperately wrong under other conditions. They may be +right in play, and not in serious things; they may be right in youth, +and not in maturity; they may be right at one period of the world's +development, while at another period they are destructive of social +existence. If, therefore, we wish to know what are right and wrong +actions in the affairs of men, if we wish to judge any particular law or +political platform or program of business readjustment, the first thing +we have to do is to acquire a mass of facts concerning the society to +which the law or platform or program, is to be applied. We need to ask +ourselves, exactly what will be the effect of that change, applied in +that particular way at that particular time. In order to decide +accurately, we need to know the previous stages through which that +society has passed, the forces which have been operating in it, and the +ways in which they have worked. + +But also we must realize that the lessons of history cannot ever be +accepted blindly. The "principles of the founders" apply to us only in +modified form; for the world in which we live today is different from +any world which has ever been before, and the world tomorrow will be +different yet. We are the makers of it, and the masters of it, and what +it will be depends to some extent upon our choice. In fact, that is the +most important lesson of all for us to learn; the final purpose of all +our thought about the world is to enable us to make it a happier and a +better world for ourselves and our posterity to live in. + + + + +CHAPTER L + +ARISTOCRACY AND DEMOCRACY + + (Discusses the idea of superior classes and races, and whether + there is a natural basis for such a doctrine.) + + +In the letters of Thomas Jefferson is found the following passage: + +"All eyes are open or opening to the rights of man. The general spread +of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable +truth that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their +backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them +legitimately, by the grace of God." + +This, which Jefferson, over a hundred years ago, described as a +"palpable truth," is still a long way from prevailing in the world. We +are trying in this book not to take anything for granted, so we do not +assume this truth, but investigate it; and we begin by admitting that +there are many facts which seem to contradict it, and which make it more +difficult of proof than Jefferson realized. It is not enough to point +out the lack of saddles on the backs, and of boots and spurs on the feet +of newly born infants; for the fact is that men are not exploited +because of saddles, nor is the exploiting accomplished by means of boots +and spurs. It is done by means of gold and steel, banks and credit +systems, railroads, machine-guns and battleships. And while it is not +true that certain races and classes are born with these things on them, +they are born to the possession of them, and the vast majority of +mankind are without them all their lives, and without the ability to use +them even if they had them. + +The doctrine that "all men are created equal," or that they ought to be +equal, we shall describe for convenience as the democratic doctrine. It +first came to general attention through Christianity, which proclaimed +the brotherhood of all mankind in a common fatherhood of God. But even +as taught by the Christians, the doctrine had startling limitations. It +was several centuries before a church council summoned the courage to +decide that women were human beings, and had souls; and today many +devout Christians are still uncertain whether Japanese and Chinese and +Filipinos and Negroes are human beings, and have souls. I have heard old +gentlemen in the South gravely maintain that the Negro is not a human +being at all, but a different species of animal. I have heard learned +men in the South set forth that the sutures in the Negro skull close at +some very early age, and thus make moral responsibility impossible for +the black race. And you will find the same ideas maintained, not merely +as to differences of race and color, but as to differences of economic +condition. You will find the average aristocratic Englishman quite +convinced that the "lower orders" are permanently inferior to himself, +and this though they are of the same Anglo-Saxon stock. + +For convenience I will refer to the doctrine that there is some natural +and irremovable inferiority of certain races or classes, as the +aristocratic doctrine. I will probably startle some of my readers by +making the admission that if there is any such natural or irremovable +inferiority, then a belief in political or economic equality is a +blunder. If there are certain classes or races which cannot think, or +cannot learn to think as well as other classes and races, those mentally +inferior classes and races will obey, and they will be made to obey, and +neither you nor I, nor all the preachers and agitators in the world, +will ever be able to arrange it otherwise. Suppose we could do it, we +should be committing a crime against life; we should be holding down the +race and aborting its best development. + +Is there any such natural and irremovable inferiority in human beings? +When we come to study the question we find it complicated by a different +phenomenon, that of racial immaturity, which we have to face frankly and +get clear in our minds. One of the most obvious facts of nature is that +of infancy and childhood. We have just pointed out that if you are +competing with a child, you do it in an entirely different way and under +an entirely different set of rules, and if you fail to do this, you are +unfair and even cruel to the child. And it is a fact of our world that +there are some races more backward in the scale of development than +other races. You may not like this fact, but it is silly to try to evade +it. People who live in savage huts and beat on tom-toms and fight with +bows and arrows and cannot count beyond a dozen--such people are not +the mental or moral equals of our highly civilized races, and to treat +them as equals, and compete with them on that basis, means simply to +exterminate them. And we should either exterminate them at once and be +done with it, or else make up our minds that they are in a childhood +stage of our race, and that we have to guide them and teach them as we +do our children. + +There is no more useful person than the wise and kind teacher. But +suppose we saw some one pretending to be a teacher to our children, +while in reality enslaving and exploiting them, or secretly robbing and +corrupting them--what would we say about that kind of teacher? The name +of that teacher is capitalist commercialism, and his profession is known +as "the white man's burden"; his abuse of power is the cause of our +present racial wars and revolts of subject peoples. A fair-minded man, +desirous of facing all the facts of life, hardly knows what stand to +take in such a controversy; that is, hardly knows from which cause the +colored races suffer more--the white man's exploitation, or their own +native immaturity. + +To say that certain races are in a childhood stage, and need instruction +and discipline, is an entirely different thing from saying they are +permanently inferior and incapable of self-government. Whether they are +permanently inferior is a problem for the man of science, to be +determined by psychological tests, continued possibly over more than one +generation. We have not as yet made a beginning; in fact, we have not +even acquired the scientific impartiality necessary to such an inquiry. + +In the meantime, all that we can do is to look about us and pick up +hints where we can. In places like Massachusetts, where Negroes are +allowed to go to college and are given a chance to show what they can +do, they have not ousted the white man, but many of them have certainly +won his respect, and one finds charming and cultured men among them, who +show no signs of prematurely closed up skulls. And one after another we +see the races which have been held down as being inferior, developing +leadership and organization and power of moral resistance. The Irish are +showing themselves today one of the most vigorous and high-spirited of +all races. The Hindus are developing a movement which in the long run +may prove more powerful than the white man's gold and steel. The +Egyptians, the Persians, the Filipinos, the Koreans, are all devising +ways to break the power of capitalist newspaper censorship. How sad that +the subject races of the world have to get their education through +hatred of their teachers, instead of through love! + +Of course, these rebel leaders are men who have absorbed the white man's +culture, at least in part; practically always they are of the younger +generation, which has been to the white man's schools. But this is the +very answer we have been seeking--as to whether the race is permanently +inferior, or merely immature and in need of training. It is not only +among the brown and black and yellow races that progress depends upon +the young generations; that is a universal fact of life. + +In the course of this argument we shall assume that the Christian or +democratic theory has the weight of probability on its side, and that +nature has not created any permanently and necessarily inferior race or +class. We shall assume that the heritage of culture is a common +heritage, open to all our species. We shall not go so far as the +statement which Jefferson wrote into the Declaration of Independence, +that "all men are created free and equal"; but we shall assert that they +are created "with certain inalienable rights," and that among these is +the right to maintain their lives and to strive for liberty and +happiness. Also, we shall say that there will never be peace or order in +the world until they have found liberty, and recognition of their right +to happiness. + + + + +CHAPTER LI + +RULING CLASSES + + (Deals with authority in human society, how it is obtained, and + what sanction it can claim.) + + +It is possible to conceive an order of nature in which all individuals +were born and developed exactly alike and with exactly equal powers. +Such is apparently the case with lower animals, for example the ants and +the bees. But among human beings there are great differences; some are +born idiots and some are born geniuses. Even supposing that we are able +to do away with blindness and idiocy, it is not likely that we can ever +make a race of uniform genius. There will always be some more capable +minds, who will discover new powers of life, and will compel the others +to learn from them. It is to the interest of the race that this learning +should be done as quickly as possible. In other words, the great problem +of society is how to recognize superior minds and put them in authority. + +We look back over history, and discover a few wise men, and many rulers; +but very, very rarely does it happen that the ruler is a wise man, or a +friend of wise men. Far more often we find the ruler occupied in +suppressing the wise man and his wisdom. There was a ruler who allowed +the mob to crucify Jesus, and another who ordered Socrates to drink the +hemlock, and another who tortured Galileo, and another who chopped off +the head of Sir Walter Raleigh--and so on through a long and tragic +chronicle. And even when the accident of a wise ruler occurs he is apt +to be surrounded by a class of parasites and corrupt officials who are +busy to thwart his will. + +The general run of history is this: some group seizes power by force, +and holds it by the same means, and seeks to augment and perpetuate it. +Those who win the power are frequently men of energy and practical +sense, and do fairly well as governors; but they are never able to hand +on their virtues, and their line becomes corrupted by sensuality and +self-indulgence, and the subject classes are plundered and driven to +revolt. Often the revolt fails, but in the course of time it succeeds, +and there is a new dynasty, or a new ruling class, sometimes a little +better than the old, sometimes worse. + +How shall one judge whether the new régime is better or worse? +Obviously, this is a most important question; it has to do, not merely +with history, but with our daily affairs, our voting. As one who has +read some tens of thousands of pages of history, and has pondered its +lessons with heart-sickness and despair, I lay down this general law by +which revolts and changes of power may be judged: If the change results +in the holding of power by a smaller number of people, it is a reaction; +but if the change results in distributing the power among a larger group +of the community, then that community has made a step in advance. + +I have seen a sketch of the history of some Central American +country--Guatemala, I think--which showed 130 revolutions in less than a +hundred years. Some rascal gets together a gang, and seizes the +government and plunders its revenue. When he has plundered too much, +some other rascal stirs up the people, and gets together another gang. +Such "revolutions" we regard as subjects for comic opera, and for the +Richard Harding Davis type of fiction; but we do not consider them as +having any relationship to progress. We describe them as "palace" +revolutions. + +But compare with this the various English revolutions. We write learned +histories about them, and describe England as "the Mother of +Parliaments." The reason for this is that when there was political +discontent in England, the protesting persons proceeded to organize +themselves, and to understand their trouble and to remedy it. They had +the brain power to do this; they maintained their right to do it, and +when by violence or threats of violence they forced the ruling class to +give way, they brought about a wider extension of liberty, a wider +distribution of power. Tennyson has pictured England as a state "where +freedom slowly broadens down from precedent to precedent." We today, +reading its history, are inclined to put a sarcastic emphasis on the +word "slowly"; but Tennyson would answer that it is better for a +community to move forward slowly than to move forward rapidly and then +move backward nearly as far. + +We have pointed out several times the important fact of biology that +change does not necessarily mean progress from any rational or moral +point of view. Degeneration is just as real a fact as progress, and it +does not at all follow that because things change they are changing for +the better. It is worth while to repeat this in discussing human +society, for it is just as true of governments and morals as of living +species. A nation may pile up wealth, and multiply a hundredfold the +machinery of wealth production, and only be increasing luxury and +wantonness and graft. A nation may change its governmental forms, its +laws and social conventions, and boast noisily of these changes in the +name of progress, while as a matter of fact it is following swiftly the +road to ruin which all the empires of history have traced. So far as I +can discover, there is one test, and only one, by which you can judge, +and that is the test already indicated: Is the actual, effective power +of the state wielded by a larger or a smaller percentage of the +population than before the change took place? + +You will note the words "actual, effective power." Nothing is more +familiar in human life than for forms to survive after the spirit which +created them is dead; and nothing is more familiar than the use of these +forms as masks to deceive the populace. There have been many times in +history when people have gone on voting, long after their votes ceased +to count for anything; there have been many times when people have gone +through the motions of freedom long after they have been slaves. Mexico +under Diaz had one of the most perfect of constitutions, and was in +reality one of the most perfect of despotisms; and we Americans are +sadly familiar with political democracies which do not work. + +Shall we, therefore, join the pessimists and say that history is a blind +struggle for useless power, and that the notion of progress is a +delusion? I do not think so; on the contrary, I think it is easily to be +demonstrated that there has been a steady increase in the amount of +knowledge possessed by the race, and in the spread of this knowledge +among the whole population. I think that through most of the period of +written history we can trace a real development in human society. I +think we can analyze the laws of this development, and explain its +methods; and I think this knowledge is precious to us, because it +enables us to accelerate the process and to make the end more certain. +This task, the analysis of social evolution, is the task we have next to +undertake. + + + + +CHAPTER LII + +THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION + + (Discusses the series of changes through which human society has + passed.) + + +We have now to consider, briefly, the history of man as a social being, +the groups he has formed, and the changes in his group systems. +Everything in life grows, and human societies are no exception to the +rule. They have undergone a long process of evolution, which we can +trace in detail, and which we find conforms exactly to the law laid down +by Herbert Spencer; a process whereby a number of single and similar +things become different parts of one complex thing. In the case of human +societies the units are men and women, and social evolution is a process +whereby a small and simple group, in which the individuals are +practically alike, grows into a large and complex group, in which the +individuals are widely different, and their relations one to another are +complicated and subtle. + +There are two powerful forces pressing upon human beings, and compelling +them to struggle and grow. The first of these forces is fear, the need +of protection against enemies; the second is hunger, the need of food +and the means of producing and storing food. The first causes the +individual to combine with his fellows and establish some form of +government, and this is the origin of political evolution. The second +causes him to accumulate wealth, and to combine industrially, and this +is the origin of economic evolution. Because the first force is a little +more urgent, we observe in the history of human society that evolution +in government precedes evolution in industry. + +I made this statement some twenty years ago, in an article in "Collier's +Weekly." I wrote to the effect that man's first care was to secure +himself against his enemies, and that when he had done this he set out +to secure his food supply. "Collier's" called upon the late Professor +Sumner of Yale University, a prize reactionary and Tory of the old +school, to answer me; and Professor Sumner made merry over my statement, +declaring that man sought for food long before he was safe from his +enemies. Some years later, when Sumner died, one of his admirers wrote +in the New York "Evening Post" that he had completely overwhelmed me, +and I had acknowledged my defeat by failing to reply--something which +struck me as very funny. It was, of course, possible that Sumner had +overwhelmed me, but to say that I had considered myself overwhelmed was +to attribute to me a degree of modesty of which I was wholly incapable. +As a matter of fact, I had had my usual experience with capitalist +magazines; "Collier's Weekly" had promised to publish my rejoinder to +Sumner, but failed to keep the promise, and finally, when I worried +them, they tucked the answer away in the back part of the paper, among +the advertisements of cigars and toilet soaps. + +Professor Sumner is gone, but he has left behind him an army of pupils, +and I will protect myself against them by phrasing my statement with +extreme care. I do not mean to say that man first secures himself +completely against his enemies, and then goes out to hunt for a meal. Of +course he has to eat while he is countering the moves of his enemies; he +has to eat while he is on the march to battle, or in flight from it. But +ask yourself this question: which would you choose, if you had to +choose--to go a couple of days with nothing to eat, or to have your +throat cut by bandits and your wife and children carried away into +slavery? Certainly you would do your fighting first, and meantime you +would scratch together any food you could. While you were devoting your +energies to putting down civil war, or to making a treaty with other +tribes, or to preparing for a military campaign, you would continue to +get food in the way your ancestors had got it; in other words, your +economic evolution would wait, while your political evolution proceeded. +But when you had succeeded in putting down your enemies, and had a long +period of peace before you, then you would plant some fields, and +domesticate some animals, or perhaps discover some new way of weaving +cloth--and so your industrial life would make progress. + +It is easy to see why Professor Sumner wished to confuse this issue. He +could not deny political evolution, because it had happened. He despised +and feared political democracy, but it was here, and he had to speak +politely to it, as to a tiger that had got into his house. But +industrial democracy was a thing that had not yet happened in the +world; it was only a hope and a prophecy, and therefore a prize old Tory +was free to ridicule it. I remember reading somewhere his statement--the +notion that democracy had anything to do with industry, or could in any +way be applied to industry, was a piece of silliness. So, of course, he +sought to demolish my idea that there was a process of evolution in +economic affairs, paralleling the process of political evolution which +had already culminated in democracy. + +Let us consider the process of political evolution, briefly and in its +broad outlines. Take any savage tribe; you find it composed of +individuals who are very much alike. Some are a little stronger than +others, a little more clever, more powerful in battle; but the +difference is slight, and when the tribe chooses someone to lead them, +they might as well choose one man as another. They all have a say in the +tribe councils, both men and women; their "rights" in the tribe are the +same. They are, of course, slaves to ignorance, to degrading +superstition and absurd taboos; but these things apply to everyone +alike, there is no privileged caste, no hereditary inequality. + +But little by little, as the tribe grows in numbers, and in power and +intelligence, as it comes to capture slaves in battle, and to unite with +other tribes, there comes to be an hereditary chieftain and a group of +his leading supporters, his courtiers and henchmen. When the society has +evolved into the stage which we call barbarism, there is a permanent +superior caste; there are hereditary priests, who have in their keeping +the favor of the gods; and there is a subject population of slaves. + +The society moves on into the feudal stage, in which the various grades +and classes are precisely marked off, each with its different functions, +its different privileges and rights and duties. The feudal +principalities and duchies war and struggle among themselves; they are +united by marriage or by conquest, and presently some stronger ruler +brings a great territory under his power, and we have what is called a +kingdom; a society still larger, still more complex in its organization, +and still more rigid in its class distinctions. Take France, under the +ancient régime, and compare a courtier or noble gentleman with a serf; +they are not only different before the law, they are different in the +language they use, in the clothes they wear, in the ideas they hold; +they are different even in their bodies, so that the gentleman regards +the serf as an inferior species of creature. + +The kings warred among themselves and emperors arose. The ultimate ideal +in Europe was a political society which should include the whole +continent, and this ideal was several times almost attained. But it is +the rule of history that wherever a large society is built upon the +basis of privilege and enslavement, the ruling classes prove morally and +intellectually unequal to the burden put upon them; they become +corrupted, and their rule becomes intolerable. This happened in Europe, +and there came political revolutions--first in England, which +accomplished it by gradual stages, and then in the French monarchy, and +quite recently in a dozen monarchies and empires, large and small. + +What precisely is this political revolution? Let us consider the case of +France, where the change was sudden, and the issues precisely drawn. +King Louis XIV had said, "I am the state." To a person of our time that +might seem like boasting, but it was merely an assertion of the existing +political fact. King Louis was the state by universal consent, and by +divine authority, as all men believed. The army was his army, the navy +was his navy, and wars, when he made them, were his wars. Everyone in +the state was his subject, and all the property of the state was his +personal, private property, to dispose of as he pleased. The government +officials carried out his will, and members of the nobility held the +land and ruled in his name. + +But now suddenly the people of France overthrew the king, and put him to +death, and drove the nobles into exile; they seized the power of the +French state, and proclaimed themselves equal citizens in the state, +with equal voices in its government and equal rights before the law. So +we call France a republic, and describe this form of society as +political democracy. It is the completion of the process of political +evolution, and you will see that it moves in a sort of spiral; having +completed a circle and got back where it was before, but upon a higher +plane. The citizens of a modern republic are equal before the law, just +as were the members of the savage tribe; but the political organization +is vastly larger, and infinitely more complicated, and every individual +lives his life upon a higher level, because he shares in the benefits of +this more highly organized and more powerful state. + + + + +CHAPTER LIII + +INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION + + (Examines the process of evolution in industry and the stage which + it has so far reached.) + + +And now let us consider the process of industrial evolution. We shall +find it to be exactly the same thing, reproducing the changes in another +field of activity. You may picture two gigantic waves sweeping over the +ocean. In some places the waves are far apart, and in other places they +are closer together; for a time they may mingle, and perhaps their bases +always mingle. It would be easy for a critic to point out how political +affairs play a leading part in industrial evolution, and vice versa; it +would be easy to argue that property rules the political state, or +again, that the main function of the political state is to protect +property. As I have said, man has to fight his enemies, and he has to +seek food, and often he has to do the two things at the same time; but +nevertheless, broadly speaking, we observe two great waves, sweeping +over human society, and most of the time these waves are clearly +separated and easily distinguished. + +Industry in a savage tribe is, like government, simple and uniform; all +the members of the tribe get their living in the same way. One may be a +little more expert as a fisherman, another as a gatherer of cocoanuts, +but the fisherman gathers cocoanuts and the cocoanut-gatherer fishes. In +the days of primitive communism there is little economic strife and +little change; but as slavery comes in, and the private property system, +there begins industrial war--the members of the tribe trade with one +another, and argue over prices, and gradually some get the better of +others, they accumulate slaves and goods, and later on they appropriate +the land to their private use. Of course, the men who do this are often +the rulers of the tribe, and so politics and industry are mixed; but +even assuming that the state never interfered, assuming that the +government allowed business affairs to work themselves out in their own +way, the tendency of competition is always to end in monopoly. The big +fish eat the little fish, the strong gain advantage over the weak, the +rich grow richer, and the poor grow relatively poorer. As the amount of +trading increases, and men specialize in the arts of bargaining, we see +again and again how money concentrates in the hands of a few. It does +this, even when the political state tries to prevent it; as, for +example, when the princes and dukes of the Middle Ages would torture the +Jewish money-lenders and take away their treasure, but the Jews never +failed to grow rich again. + +It is when political evolution has completed itself, and a republic has +been set up, that a free field is given to economic forces to work +themselves out to their logical end. We have seen this in the United +States, where we all started pretty much on the same economic level, and +where political tyranny has had little hold. Our civilization is a +civilization of the trader--the business man, as we call him; and we see +how big business absorbs little business, and grows constantly larger +and more powerful. We are familiar with what we call "graft," the use by +business men of the powers of government to get trade advantage for +themselves, and we have a school of old-time thinkers, calling +themselves "Jeffersonian Democrats," who insist that if only there had +never been any government favors, economic equality and democracy would +have endured forever in our country. But it is my opinion that +government has done far more to prevent monopoly and special privilege +in business than to favor it; and nevertheless, monopoly has grown. + +In other words, the tendency toward concentration in business, the +absorption of the small business by the big business, is an irresistible +natural process, which neither can be nor should be hindered. The +condition of competition, whether in politics or in industry, is never a +permanent one, and can never be made permanent; it is a struggle which +automatically brings itself to an end. Large-scale production and +distribution is more economical than small-scale, and big business has +irresistible advantages of credit and permanence over little business. +As we shall presently show, the blind and indiscriminate production of +goods under the competitive system leads to the glutting of markets and +to industrial crises. At such times the weaker concerns are weeded out +and the strong ones take their trade; and as a result, we have the +modern great corporation, the most powerful machine of production yet +devised by man, and which corresponds in every aspect to the monarchy in +political society. + +We are accustomed to speak of our "captains of industry," our "coal +kings," and "beef barons" and "lords of steel," and we think we are +using metaphors; but the universality of these metaphors points to a +fundamental truth in them. As a matter of fact, our modern captain of +industry fills in the economic world exactly the same functions as were +filled in ancient days by the head of a feudal state. He has won his +power in a similar struggle, and he holds it by similar methods. He +rules over an organization of human beings, arranged, economically +speaking, in grades and classes, with their authorities and privileges +and duties precisely determined, as under the "ancient régime." And just +as King Louis said, "I am the state," so Mr. Armour considers that he is +Armour & Co., and Mr. Morgan considers that he is the house of Morgan, +and that the business exists for him and is controlled by him under +divine authority. + +If I am correct in my analysis of the situation, this process of +industrial evolution is destined to complete itself, as in the case of +the political state. The subject populations of industry are becoming +more and more discontented with their servitude, more and more resentful +of that authority which compels them to labor while others reap the +benefit. They are organizing themselves, and preparing for a social +transformation which will parallel in every detail the revolution by +which our ancestors overthrew the authority of King George III over the +American colonies, and made inhabitants of those colonies no longer +subjects of a king, but free and equal citizens of a republic. I expect +to see a change throughout the world, which will take the great +instruments of production which we call corporations and trusts, out of +the hands of their present private owners, and make them the property, +either of the entire community, or of those who do the work in them. +This change is the "social revolution," and when it has completed +itself, we shall have in that society an Industrial Republic, a form of +business management which constitutes economic democracy. + +The history of the world's political revolutions has been written almost +exclusively by aristocratic or bourgeois historians; that is to say, by +men who, whatever their attitude toward political democracy, have no +conception of industrial democracy, and believe that industrial strife +and enslavement are the normal conditions of life. If, however, you will +read Kropotkin's "Great French Revolution," you will be interested to +discover how important a part was played in this revolution by economic +forces. Underneath the political discontent of the merchants and middle +classes lay a vast mass of social discontent of the peasants and +workers. It was the masses of the people who made the revolution, but it +was the middle classes who seized it and turned it to their own ends, +putting down attempts toward economic equality, and confining the +changes, so far as possible, to the political field. + +And everywhere throughout history, if you study revolutions, you find +that same thing happening. You find, for example, Martin Luther fighting +for the right to preach the word of God without consulting the Pope; but +when the peasants of Germany rose and sought to set themselves free from +feudal landlords, Luther turned against them, and called upon the +princes to shoot them down. "The ass needs to be beaten, and the +populace needs to be controlled with a strong hand." The landlords and +propertied classes of England were willing to restrict the power of the +king, and to give the vote to the educated and well-to-do; but from the +time of Jack Cade to our own they shoot down the poor. + +But meantime, the industrial process continues; the modern factory +system brings the workers together in larger and larger groups, and +teaches them the lesson of class consciousness. So the time of the +workers draws near. The first attempt in modern times to accomplish the +social revolution and set up industrial democracy was in the Paris +Commune. When the French empire collapsed, after the war with Germany in +1871, the workers of Paris seized control. They were massacred, some +50,000 of them, and the propertied classes of France established the +present bourgeois republic, which has now become the bulwark of reaction +throughout the Continent of Europe. + +Next came the Russian revolution of 1905, and this was an interesting +illustration of the relation between the two waves of social progress. +Russia was a backward country industrially, and according to theory not +at all prepared for the social revolution. But nowadays the thoughts of +men circulate all over the world, and the exiles from Russia had +absorbed Marxian ideas, and were not prepared to accept a purely +political freedom. So in 1905, after the Japanese war, when the people +rose and forced the Czar to grant a parliament, the extremists made an +effort to accomplish the social revolution at the same time. The +peasants began to demand the land, and the workers the factories; +whereupon the capitalists and middle classes, who wanted a parliament, +but did not want Socialism, went over to the side of reaction, and both +the political and social revolutions were crushed. + +But then came the great war, for which Russia with her incompetent +government and her undeveloped industry was unprepared. The strain of it +broke her down long before the other Allies, and in the universal +suffering and ruin the Russian people were again forced to rise. The +political revolution was accomplished, the Czar was imprisoned, and the +Douma reigned supreme. Middle class liberalism throughout the world gave +its blessings to this revolution, and hastened to welcome a new +political democracy to the society of nations. But then occurred what to +orthodox democratic opinion has been the most terrifying spectacle in +human history. The Russian people had been driven too far towards +starvation and despair; the masses had been too embittered, and they +rose again, overthrowing not only their Czar and their grand dukes, but +their capitalists and land-owners. For the first time in history the +social revolution established itself, and the workers were in control of +a great state. Ever since then we have seen exactly what we saw in +Europe from 1789 onward, when the first political republic was +established, and all the monarchies and empires of the world banded +themselves together to stamp it out. We have witnessed a campaign of +war, blockade, intrigue and propaganda against the Soviet government of +Russia, all pretending to be carried on in the name of the Russian +people, and for the purpose of saving them from suffering--but all +obviously based upon one consideration and one alone, the fear that an +effort at industrial self-government might possibly prove to be a +success. + +Whether or not the Soviets will prove permanent, no one can say. But +this much is certain; just as the French revolution sent a thrill around +the world, and planted in the hearts of the common people the wonderful +dream of freedom from kings and ruling classes, just so the Russian +revolution has brought to the working masses the dream of freedom from +masters and landlords. Everywhere in capitalist society this ferment is +working, and in one country after another we see the first pangs of the +new birth. Also we see capitalists and landlords, who once found +"democracy," "free speech" and "equality before the law" useful formulas +to break down the power of kings and aristocrats, now repudiating their +old-time beliefs, and going back to the frankest reaction. We see, in +our own "land of the free," the government refusing to reprint the +Declaration of Independence during the war, and arresting men for +quoting from it and circulating it; we even see the Department of +Justice refusing to allow people to reprint the Sermon on the Mount! + + + + +CHAPTER LIV + +THE CLASS STRUGGLE + + (Discusses history as a battle-ground between ruling and subject + classes, and the method and outcome of this struggle.) + + +There is a theory of social development, sometimes called the +materialistic interpretation of history, and sometimes the economic +interpretation of history. It is one of the contributions to our thought +which we owe to Karl Marx, and like all the rest of Marxian theory, it +is a subject of embittered controversy, not merely between Socialists +and orthodox economists, but between various schools of revolutionary +doctrine. For my part, I have never been a great hand for doctrine, +whether ancient or modern; I am not much more concerned with what Marx +taught than I am with what St. Paul taught, or what Martin Luther +taught. My advice is to look at life with your own eyes, and to state in +simple language the conclusions of your own thinking. + +Man is an eating animal; he has also been described as a tool-making +animal, and might be described as an ideal-making animal. There is a +tendency on the part of those who specialize in the making of ideals to +repudiate the eating and the tool-making sides of man; which accounts +for the quarrel between the Marxians and the moralists. All through +history you find new efforts of man to develop his emotional and +spiritual nature, and to escape from the humiliating limitations of the +flesh. These efforts have many of them been animated by desperate +sincerity, but none of them have changed the fundamental fact that man +is an eating animal, an animal insufficiently provided by nature against +cold, and with an intense repugnance to having streams of cold water run +down back of his neck. The religious teachers go out with empty purse, +and "take no thought for the morrow"; but the forces of nature press +insistently upon them, and little by little they make compromises, they +take to shelter while they are preaching, they consent to live in +houses, and even to own houses, and to keep a bank account. So they make +terms with the powers of this world, and the powers of this world, +which are subtle, and awake to their own interests, find ways to twist +the new doctrine to their ends. + +So the new religion becomes simply another form of the old hypocrisy; +and it comes to us as a breath of fresh air in a room full of corruption +when some one says, "Let us have done with aged shams and false +idealisms. Let us face the facts of life, and admit that man is a +physical animal, and cannot do any sane and constructive thinking until +he has food and shelter provided. Let us look at history with unblinking +eyes, and realize that food and shelter, the material means of life, are +what men have been seeking all through history, and will continue to +seek, until we put production and distribution upon a basis of justice, +instead of a basis of force." + +Such is, as simply as I can phrase it, the materialistic interpretation +of history. Put into its dress of scientific language it reads: the +dominant method of production and exchange in any society determines the +institutions and forms of that society. I do not think I exaggerate in +saying that this formula, applied with judgment and discrimination, is a +key to the understanding of human societies. + +Wherever man has moved into the stage of slavery and private property +there has been some group which has held power and sought to maintain +and increase it. This group has set the standards of behavior and belief +for the community, and if you wish to understand the government and +religion, the manners and morals, the philosophy and literature and art +of that community, the first thing you have to do is to understand the +dominant group and its methods of keeping itself on top. This statement +applies, not merely to those cultural forms which are established and +ordained by the ruling class; it applies equally well to the +revolutionary forms, the behavior and beliefs of those who oppose the +ruling class. For men do not revolt in a vacuum, they revolt against +certain conditions, and the form of their revolt is determined by the +conditions. Take, for example, primitive Christianity, which was +certainly an effort to be unworldly, if ever such an effort was made by +man. But you cannot understand anything about primitive Christianity +unless you see it as a new form of slave revolt against Roman +imperialism and capitalism. + +The theory of the class struggle is the master key to the bewilderments +and confusions of history. Always there is a dominant class, holding +the power of the state, and always there are subject classes; and sooner +or later the subject classes begin protesting and struggling for wider +rights. When they think they are strong enough, they attempt a revolt, +and sometimes they succeed. If they do, they write the histories of the +revolt, and their leaders become heroes and statesmen. If they fail, the +histories are written by their oppressors, and the rebels are portrayed +as criminals. + +One of the commonest of popular assumptions is that if the rebels have +justice on their side, they are bound to succeed in the long run; but +this is merely the sentimental nonsense that is made out of history. It +is perfectly possible for a just revolt to be crushed, and to be crushed +again and again; just as it is possible for a child which is ready to be +born to fail to be born, and to perish miserably. The fact that the +Huguenots had most of the virtue and industry and intelligence of France +did not keep them from being slaughtered by Catholic bigots, and +reaction riveted upon the French people for a couple of hundred years. +The fact that the Moors had most of the industry of Spain did not keep +them from being driven into exile by the Inquisition, and the +intellectual life of the Spanish people strangled for three hundred or +four hundred years. + +Some eight hundred years ago our ancestors in England brought a cruel +and despotic king to battle, and conquered him, and on the field of +Runnymede forced him to sign a grant of rights to Englishmen. That +document is known as Magna Carta, or the Great Charter, and everyone who +writes political history today recognizes it as one of the greatest of +man's achievements, the beginning of a process which we hope will bring +freedom and equality before the law to every human being on earth. + +And now we have come to the stage in our industrial affairs, when the +organized workers seek to bring the monarchs of industry into the +council chamber, and force them to sign a similar Great Charter, which +will grant freedom and self-government to the workers. Just as King John +was forced to admit that the power to tax and spend the public revenue +belonged to the people of England, and not to the ruler; just so the +workers will establish the principle that the finances of industry are a +public concern, that the books are to be opened, and prices fixed and +wages paid by the democratic vote of the citizens of industry. If that +change is accomplished, the historian of the future will recognize it +as another momentous step in progress; and he will heed the protests of +the lords of industry, that they are being deprived of their freedom to +do business, and of their sacred legal rights to their profits, as +little as he heeded the protests of King John against the "treason" and +"usurpation" and infringement of "divine right" by the rebellious +barons. + + + + +CHAPTER LV + +THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM + + (Shows how wealth is produced in modern society, and the effect of + this system upon the minds of the workers.) + + +In the beginning man got his living by hunting and fishing. Then he took +to keeping flocks and herds, and later by slow stages he settled down to +agriculture. With the introduction of slavery and the ownership of the +land by ruling classes, there came to be a subject class of workers, who +toiled on the land from dawn to dark, year in and year out, and got, if +they were fortunate, an existence for themselves and their families. +Whether these workers were called slaves or serfs or peasants, whether +their product was taken from them in the form of taxes by the king, or +of rent by the landlord, made no difference; the workers were bound to +the soil, like the beasts with which they lived in intimate contact. +They were drafted into armies, and made to fight for their lords and +masters; they suffered pestilence and famine, fire and slaughter; but +with infinite patience they would rebuild their huts, and dig and plant +again, whether for the old master or for a new one. + +In the early days these workers made their own crude tools and weapons; +but very early there must have been some who specialized in such arts, +and with the growth of towns and communications came a new kind of +labor, based upon a new system. Some enterprising man would buy slaves, +or hire labor, and obtain a supply of raw material, and manufacture +goods to be bartered or sold. He would pay his workers enough to draw +them from the land, and would sell the product for what he could get, +and the difference would be his profit. That was capitalism, and at +first it was a thing of no importance, and the men who engaged in it had +no social standing. But princes and lords needed weapons and supplies +for their armies, and the men who could furnish these things became more +and more necessary, and the states which encouraged them were the ones +which rose to power. Merchants and sea-traders became the intimates of +kings, and by the time of the Roman empire, capitalism was a great +world power, dominating the state, using the armies of the state for its +purposes. It went down with the rest of Roman civilization, but in the +Middle Ages it began once more to revive, and by the end of the +eighteenth century the merchants and money lenders of France, with their +retainers, the lawyers and journalists, were powerful enough to take the +control of society. + +Then, in the beginning of the nineteenth century, came the invention of +machinery and of the power process. Capitalism began to grow like a +young giant among pygmies. In the course of a century it has ousted all +other methods of production, and all other forms of social activity. A +hundred years ago the British House of Commons was a parliament of +landlords; today it is a Merchants' and Manufacturers' Association. Out +of the 707 members of the British House of Commons, 361 are members of +the "Federation of British Industries," the labor-smashing organization +of British "big business." And the same is true of every other +parliament and congress in the modern capitalist state. Practically all +the wealth of the world today is produced by the capitalist method, and +distributed under capitalist supervision, and therefore capitalist ideas +prevail in our society, to the practical exclusion of all other ideas. I +have shown in "The Profits of Religion" how these ideas dominate the +modern church, and in "The Brass Check" how they dominate the modern +press. I plan to write two books, to show how they dominate education +and literature. + +A hundred years ago an industry consisted of a half a dozen or a dozen +men, working under the personal supervision of an owner, and using crude +hand tools. Today it consists of a gigantic trust, owning and managing +scores and perhaps hundreds of mills and factories, each employing +thousands of workers. A corporation like the Steel Trust owns enough of +the sources of its raw material to give it practical monopoly; it owns a +fleet of vessels especially designed for ore-carrying; it owns its +private railroads, to deliver the ore to the mills. Through its system +of dummy directorates it has practical control of the main railroads +over which it distributes its products; also of banks and trust +companies and insurance companies, to gather the money of the public to +finance its undertakings. It owns huge office buildings, and vast +tracts of land upon which the homes of its workers are built. It has a +private army for the defense of its property--a complete army of +cavalry, infantry and artillery, including a large and highly efficient +secret service department, with a host of informers and spies. It has +newspapers for the purpose of propaganda, and it controls the government +of every village, town and city in which it has important interests. If +you will take the trouble to visit a "steel town," and make inquiries +among public officials, newspaper men, and others who are "on the +inside," you will discover that those in authority consider it necessary +and proper that "steel" should control, and are unable to conceive any +other condition of affairs. If you go to other parts of the country, +where other great industries are located, you find it taken for granted +that "copper" should control, or "lumber," or "coal," or "oil," or +whatever it may be. + +Under the system of large scale capitalism, labor is a commodity, bought +and sold in the market like any other commodity. Some years ago Congress +was requested to pass a law contradicting this fundamental fact of world +capitalism. Congress passed a law, very carefully worded so that no one +could be sure what it meant, and a few years later the Supreme Court +nullified the law. But all through this political and legal controversy +the status of labor remained exactly the same; there was a "labor +market," consisting of those members of the community who, in the +formula of Marx, had nothing but their labor power to sell. These +competed for recognition at the factory gates, and highly skilled +foremen selected those who offered the largest quantity of labor power +for the stated wage. + +So entirely impersonal is this process that there are great industries +in America in which ninety per cent of the common labor force is hired +and fired all over again in the course of a year. These men are put to +work in gangs, under a system which enables one picked man to set the +pace, and compel all the others to keep up with him, under penalty of +being discharged. This process is known as "speeding up," and its +purpose is to obtain from each worker the greatest quantity of energy in +exchange for his daily wage. In the steel industry men work twelve hours +a day for six days in the week, and then finish with a twenty-four-hour +day. If they do not work so long in other industries, it is because +experience has proven that the greatest quantity of energy can be +obtained from them in a shorter time. There are very few men who can +stand this pace for long. Those who are not crippled or killed in +accidents are broken down at forty, and all the great corporations +recognize this fact. Their foremen pick out the younger men, and +practically all concerns have an age rule, and never hire men above +forty or forty-five. + +I shall not in this book go into details concerning the fate of the +worker under the profit system. I have written two novels, "The Jungle" +and "King Coal," in which the facts are portrayed in detail, and it +seems the part of common sense to refer the reader to these text-books. +It will suffice here to set forth the main outlines of the situation. In +every capitalist country of the world the masses of the people are +herded into industries, in whose profits they have no share, and in +whose welfare they have no interest. They do not know the people for +whom they work; they have no human relationship, either with their work +or with their employers. They see the surplus of their product drawn off +to maintain a class of idlers, whose activities they know only through +the scandals of the divorce courts and the luxury-love of the moving +picture screen. They compete with one another for jobs, and bid down one +another's wages; and if they attempt to organize and end this +competition, their efforts are broken by newspaper propaganda and +policemen's clubs. At the same time they know that monopoly, open or +secret, prevails in the fixing of prices, and so they find the struggle +to "get ahead" a losing one. In America it used to be possible for the +young and energetic to "go West"; but now the wave of capitalism has +reached the Pacific coast and been thrown back, and there is no more +frontier. + +The man who works on the land has been through all the ages a solitary +man. He is better friends with his horse and his cow than with his +fellow humans. He is brutalized by incessant toil, he lives amid dirt +and the filth of animals, he is, in the words of Edwin Markham: + + "A thing that grieves not and that never hopes, + Stunted and stunned, a brother to the ox." + +He is a victim of natural forces which he does not understand, and +inevitably therefore he is superstitious. Being alone, he is helpless +against his masters, and only utter desperation drives him to revolt. + +But consider the capitalist system--how different the conditions of its +workers! Here they are gathered into city slums, and their wits are +sharpened by continual contact with their fellows. The printing press +makes cheap the spread of information, and the soap-box makes it even +cheaper. Any man with a grievance can shout aloud, and be sure of an +audience to listen, and he can get a great deal said before the company +watchman or the policeman can throttle him. Moreover, the modern worker +is not struggling with drought and tempest and hail; he does not see his +labors wiped out by volcanic eruption or lightning stroke; he is dealing +with machinery, something that he himself has made, and that he fully +understands. If a machine gets out of order, he does not fall down upon +his knees and pray to God to fix it. All the training of his life +teaches him the relationship of cause and effect, the adjustment of +means to ends. So the modern worker, as a necessary consequence of his +daily work, is practical, skeptical, and unsentimental in his +psychology. And what is more, he is making all the rest of society of +the same temperament. He is building roads out into the country, and +building machines to roll over them; he is running telephone lines and +sending newspapers and magazines and moving picture shows to the peasant +and the farmer; so the young peasants and farmers hunger for the city, +and they learn to fix machinery instead of praying to God. + +Such is the psychology of the modern working class; and the supreme +achievement of their sharpened wits is an understanding of the +capitalist process. As a matter of fact they did not make this discovery +for themselves; it was made for them by middle-class men, lawyers and +teachers and writers--Fourier, Owen, Marx, Lassalle. The modern doctrine +is called by various names: Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Bolshevism, +Syndicalism, Collectivism. Later on I shall define these various terms, +and point out the distinctions between them. For the moment I emphasize +the factor they all have in common, and which is fundamental: they wish +to break the power of class ownership and control of the instruments and +means of production; they wish to replace private capitalism by some +system under which the instruments and means of production are +collectively owned and operated; and they look to the non-owning class, +the proletarian, as the motive power by which this change is to be +compelled. I shall in future refer to this as the "social revolutionary" +doctrine; taking pains to explain that the word "revolutionary" is to be +divested of its popular meaning of physical violence. It is perfectly +conceivable that the change may be brought about peaceably, and I shall +try to show before long that in modern capitalist states the decision as +to whether it is brought about peaceably or by violence rests with the +present masters of industry. + + + + +CHAPTER LVI + +THE CAPITALIST PROCESS + + (How profits are made under the present industrial system and what + becomes of them.) + + +We have next to examine the structure of the capitalist order, basing +our argument on facts which are admitted by everyone, including the most +ardent defenders of the present system. + +All men have to have certain material things which we describe as goods. +As these goods do not produce themselves, it is necessary that some +should work. The workers must have tools; also they must have access to +the land and the sources of raw materials. These means of production are +owned by some individuals in the community, and this ownership gives +them power to direct the work of the rest. Those who own the land and +the natural sources of wealth we call capitalists, or business men, and +those who do not own these things, or whose share in them is +insignificant, are the proletariat, or working class. + +If you state to the average American that there is a capitalist class +and a proletariat in this country, he will point out that many who are +now members of the capitalist class were originally members of the +proletariat; they have worked hard and saved, and accumulated property. +But this is merely confusing the issue. The fact that some proletarians +turn into capitalists and some capitalists into proletarians is +important to the individuals concerned, but it does not alter the fact +that there are two classes, capitalist and proletarian. Consider, by way +of illustrating, a field with trees growing on it; we have earth, and we +have trees, and the distinction between them is unmistakable. The roots +of the trees go down into the earth, and take up portions of the earth +and turn it into tree. The leaves and the dead branches fall, and in the +course of time are turned once more to earth. There are all sorts of +stages between earth and tree, and between tree and earth; but you would +not therefore say that the word "earth" and the word "tree" are +misnomers. + +The working men go to the business man and apply for work. The business +man gives them work, and takes their product, and offers it in the +market at a price which allows him a profit above cost. If he can sell +at a profit, he repeats the process, and the worker has a job. If he +cannot sell at a profit, the worker is out of a job. Here and there may +be a benevolent business man who, rather than turn his workers out of a +job, will sell his goods at cost, or even for a short time at a loss; +but if he keeps the factory going simply for the benefit of his workers, +and with no expectation of ever making a profit, that is a form of +charity, and not the common system under which our business is now +carried on. + +So it appears that the worker is dependent for his wages upon the +ability of the business man to make a profit. The worker's life is +inextricably bound up with the profit of the capitalist--no profit for +the capitalist, no life for the worker. The capitalist, going out to +look for markets for his goods, is seeking, not merely profit for +himself, but life for his workers. + +Now, the business man pays a certain percentage of his total receipts +for labor, another percentage for raw materials, another percentage for +his overhead charges, and the rest is profit in various forms, rent to +the landlord, interest to the bondholder, dividends to the stockholder. +All this total sum goes to human individuals, and each has thus a +certain amount of money to spend. They pay it over to other individuals +for goods or services, and so the money keeps circulating, and business +keeps going. That is as deep as the average mind probes into the +process. + +But let us probe a little deeper. It is evident that, in the course of +all this exchanging of goods, some individuals get a larger share than +other individuals. Our government collects an income tax, and thus we +have statistics representing what people are willing to admit about the +share they get. In 1917 it appeared that, speaking roughly, one family +out of six had an income of over $1,000 a year, and one family out of +twelve had an income of over $2,000. But there were 19,000 families +which admitted incomes of over $50,000 a year, and 300 with over +$1,000,000 a year. + +Now the families that get less than a thousand dollars a year obviously +have to spend the greater part of their income upon their immediate +living expenses. But the families that get $50,000 a year do not need +to spend everything, and most of them take the greater part of their +income and reinvest it--that is, they spend it upon the creating of new +machinery of production, railroads, mills, factories, office buildings, +the whole elaborate structure of capitalist industry. + +Exactly what proportion of the total product of industry is thus taken +and reinvested no one can say; but this we know, our cities are growing +at an enormous rate, our manufacturing power is increasing by leaps and +bounds, we are perfecting processes which enable one man to do the work +of a hundred men, which increase the product of one man's labor a +hundredfold. All this goes on blindly, automatically; a Niagara of goods +of all sorts is poured out, and we call it "prosperity." + +But then suddenly a strange and bewildering thing happens. All at once, +and without warning, orders fall off, values begin to drop, business +collapses, factories are shut down, and millions of men are thrown out +of jobs. Merchants look at one another with blanched faces; each one has +been counting on paying his bills with the profits he was going to make, +and now his profits are gone, and he can't pay. The newspapers and +magazines keep insisting that it can't be true, that business is going +to revive next week, that prosperity is just ahead. But the factories +stay shut, and the millions of men stay idle. + +This is the condition in which we find ourselves as I write this book. +It has been happening regularly in our history every ten years or so, +ever since America started; we have had a hundred years to reflect upon +it and to probe into the causes of it, and such is business intelligence +in the most enlightened country in the world, you may search the pages +of our newspapers from the first column of millionaire divorce suits to +the last column of "situations wanted," and nowhere can you find one +word to explain this mysterious calamity of "hard times"--how it comes +to happen to our social system, or what could be done to prevent it! To +supply this deficiency in present day thinking is our next task. + + + + +CHAPTER LVII + +HARD TIMES + + (Explains why capitalist prosperity is a spasmodic thing, and why + abundant production brings distress instead of plenty.) + + +Let us picture a small island inhabited by six men. One of these men +fishes, another hunts, another gathers cocoanuts, another raises goats +for clothing, and so on. The six men among them produce by their labor +all the necessities of their lives, and they exchange their products +with one another. The island is productive, and each of the men is free, +and makes his exchanges on equal terms; on that basis the industry of +the island can continue indefinitely, and there will never be any +trouble. There may sometimes be over-production, but it will not cause +anyone to starve. If the fisherman is unusually lucky one day, he will +be able to take a vacation for a few days, living on his fish and the +products he exchanges for his fish. For the sake of convenience in +future reference, I will describe this happy island as a "free" society; +meaning that each of the members of this society has access on equal +terms to the sources of wealth, and each owns the product of his own +labor, without paying tribute to any one else for the right to labor, or +to exchange his products. + +But now let us suppose that one of the men on the island is strong and +aggressive; he takes a club and knocks down the other five men, and +compels them to sign a piece of paper agreeing that hereafter he is the +president of the land development company of the island, the chief +stockholder in the goat-raising company, and owner of the fishing +concession and the cocoanut grove; also, that hereafter goods shall not +be bartered in kind, but shall be exchanged for money, and that he is +the banker, and also the government, with the right to issue money. In +this society you will find that the real work, the actually productive +work, is done by five men, instead of by six, and these five do not get +the full value of their labor. The fisherman will fish, but his product +will no longer belong to himself; he will get part of it as wages, while +the "business man" takes charge of the balance. So when there is a +lucky day, there will be prosperity in the fishing industry, but this +prosperity will not benefit the fisherman; he will have only his wage, +and when he has caught too many fish, he will not have a few days' +vacation, but will be out of a job. + +And exactly the same thing will happen to the goat-herd. He will +probably have work all the year round, because goats have to be tended, +but he will get barely enough to keep him alive, and the surplus skins +and milk will go to the owner of the no-longer-happy island. Perhaps it +will occur to the owner that the man who raises cocoanuts might also +keep an eye on the goats, and so the goat-herd will be permanently out +of a job, and will turn into what is called a tramp, or vagrant. +Inasmuch as everything to eat on the island belongs to the owner, the +ex-goat-herd will be tempted to become a criminal, and so it will be +necessary for the owner to arm the cocoanut man with a club and make him +into a policeman; or perhaps he will organize the fisherman and the +hunter into a militia for the preservation of law and order. They will +be glad to serve him, because, owing to the extreme productivity of the +island, they will be out of jobs a great part of the time, and but for +the generosity of the business man, would have no way of earning a +living. + +But suppose that the cocoanut man should invent a machine for gathering +a year's supply of nuts in a week; suppose the fisherman should devise a +scheme to fill his boat with fish in a few minutes; and suppose that as +a result of these inventions the business man got so rich that he moved +to Paris, and no longer saw his workers, or even knew their names. Under +these conditions you can see that overproduction and unemployment might +increase on the island; and also the business man might seem less human +and lovable to his wage slaves, and might need a larger police force. It +might even happen that he would discover the need of a propaganda +department, in order to keep his police force loyal, and a secret +service to make sure that agitators did not get into the schools. + +The five islanders, having filled all the barns and storehouses, would +be turned out to starve; and when they asked the reason, they would be +told it was because they had produced a surplus of food. This may sound +grotesque, but it is what is being said to 5,000,000 men in America as I +write. There are clothing-workers who are going about in rags, and they +are told it is because they have produced too much clothing. There are +shoe-workers whose shoes are falling off their feet, and they are told +it is because they have produced too many shoes. There are carpenters +who have no homes, and they are told that a great many homes are needed, +but unfortunately it doesn't pay the builders to go ahead just now. This +may sound like a caricature, but it happens to be the most prominent +single fact in the consciousness of 5,000,000 Americans at the close of +the year 1921. No wonder they are discontented with the present order. + +The solution of the mystery is so simple that the 5,000,000 unemployed +cannot be kept permanently from understanding it. The reason the five +men on the island are starving is because one man owns the island and +the others own nothing. If the island were community property, the five +men would each own a share of the contents of the barns and storehouses, +and would not be starving. If the 100,000,000 people of America owned +the productive machinery of America, then instantly the unemployment +crisis would pass like an evil dream. The farm-workers who need shoes +would exchange their food with the starving shoe-workers, and the +starving shoe-workers would have jobs. They would want clothing, and so +the clothing-makers would start to work; and so on all the way down the +line. There is only one thing necessary to make this possible, and that +is the thing which we have agreed to call the social revolution. + + + + +CHAPTER LVIII + +THE IRON RING + + (Analyzes further the profit system, which strangles production, + and makes true prosperity impossible.) + + +We have seen that in an exploiting society there is a surplus which is +taken by the exploiter; and that under the modern system this surplus +must be sold at a profit before production can continue. The vital fact +in such a society is that the worker has not the money to buy back all +that he produces; therefore it is inevitable that a surplus product +should accumulate. When this happens, production must be cut down, and +during that period the worker is without a job, and without means of +living. The fact that he needs the product does not help him; the point +is that he has not the money to buy it. In such a society the productive +machinery is never used to the full. The machinery is controlled by a +profit-seeking interest, seeking an opportunity to make sales, and +restricting production according to the prospect of sales. So the actual +product bears no relationship to the possible product, and people who +live in an exploiting society can form no conception of true prosperity. + +For, you see, the market is limited by the competitive wage system. We +have seen that in our own rich, prosperous country only one family out +of six has more than $1,000 a year income; only one family out of twelve +has $2,000 a year. It does not make any difference that the warehouses +are bursting with goods; a family constitutes a market of so many +dollars a year, and then, so far as the profit system is concerned, that +family is non-existent; that family stops consuming, and the productive +machinery is halted to that extent. + +I have been accustomed to portray the profit system under the simile of +an iron ring riveted about the body of a baby. That ring would cause the +baby some discomfort at the beginning, but it would not be serious, and +the baby would get used to it. But as the baby grew the trouble caused +by the ring would increase, and finally there would come a time when +the baby would be suffering from a whole complication of troubles, and +for each of these troubles there would be but one remedy--break the +ring. Does the baby cry all the time? Break the ring! Is its digestion +defective? Break the ring! Is it threatened with convulsions or with +blood poisoning? Break the ring! + +Here is our industrial society, growing at a rate never equalled by any +human baby; and here is this iron ring riveted about its middle. Here is +poverty, here is unemployment, here is graft, here is crime, here is war +and plague and famine; and for all these evils there is but one cause, +and but one remedy. Break the ring! Set production free from the +strangulation of the profit system. + +I will admit that there may have been a time in the history of the +social infant when this ring was necessary. I admit that if the great +industrial machine was to be constructed, it was necessary that the mass +of the people should consume only part of what they produced, and should +allow the balance to be reinvested as capital. But now it has been done, +and the process is complete. We have a machine capable of producing many +times more than we can consume; shall we still go on building that +machine? Shall we go on starving ourselves, to save the money, to +multiply over and over again the products, in order that we may be +thrown out of work, and be starved even more completely? + +A few generations ago we had in colonial America a society that in part +at least was "free." In that society everybody got the necessities of +life. They did not have the modern Sunday supplement and the moving +picture show, but they had bread and meat and good substantial clothing, +and furniture so well made that we still preserve it. The children in +those days grew up to be strong and sturdy men and women, who would have +seen nothing to envy in the bodies or minds of the slum population of +New York and Chicago. In short, they had all the true necessities of +life; and yet their work was done by hand, the power process was unknown +and undreamed of. + +Now comes modern machinery, and multiplies the productive power of the +hand laborer by five, by ten, sometimes by a hundred. Here, for example, +is the "Appeal to Reason" selling millions of cheap books for ten cents +apiece, and making a profit on it; installing a gigantic press which +takes paper, sheet after sheet, prints 128 pages of a book at one +impression, and folds and stitches and binds the books, all in one +process, and turns them out complete at the rate of 10,000 copies per +hour. Here is a factory which turns out 100,000 automobiles a month. +Here is a mill which turns out many millions of yards of cloth a month. +If our colonial ancestors had been told about these marvels, they would +have said instantly: "Then, of course, everybody in that society will +have all the books they want, and all the clothing they want, and all +the automobiles. Everybody in that society will have five or ten or one +hundred times as much goods as we have." + +Imagine the bewilderment of our colonial ancestor if he had been told: +"The majority of the people in that society will not have so much of the +real necessities of life as you have. They will have a few cheap +trinkets, designed to tickle their senses; they will have cheap +newspapers, carefully contrived to keep their minds vacant and to keep +them contented with their lot; they will have moving picture shows +constructed for the same purpose; but all their material things will be +flimsy, put together for show and not for permanence; their food will be +adulterated, their clothing will be shoddy, everything they have will be +made, not for their service, but for the profit of some one who lives by +selling to them. The average wage earned by those who do the work of +this new machine civilization will be less than half the amount +necessary to purchase the necessities of a decent life, and one-tenth of +the total population will be living in such poverty that they are unable +to maintain physical fitness, or to rear their children into full sized +men and women." + + + + +CHAPTER LIX + +FOREIGN MARKETS + + (Considers the efforts of capitalism to save itself by marketing + its surplus products abroad, and what results from these efforts.) + + +If our analysis of present-day society is correct, we have the enormous +populations of the modern industrial countries, living always on the +verge of starvation, their chance for survival depending at all times +upon the ability of their employers to find a profitable market for a +surplus of goods. At first the employer seeks that market at home; but +when the home markets are glutted, he goes abroad; and so develops the +phenomenon of foreign trade and rivalry for foreign trade, as the basic +fact of capitalism, and the fundamental cause of modern war. + +Let us get clear a simple distinction concerning foreign trade. There is +a kind of trade which is normal, and would thrive in a "free" society. +In the United States we can produce nearly all the necessities of life, +but there are a few which we cannot produce--rubber, for example, and +bananas, and good music. These things we wish to import. We buy them +from other countries, and incur a debt, which we pay with products which +the other countries need from us; wheat, for example, and copper, and +moving pictures with cowboys in them. This is equal exchange, and a +natural phenomenon. A "free" society would produce such surplus goods as +were necessary to procure the foreign products that it desired. When it +had produced that much, the workers would stop and take a vacation until +they wanted more foreign products. + +But under capitalism we have an entirely different condition--we produce +a surplus of goods which we _have_ to sell in order to keep our +factories running, and to keep our working population from starving. And +note that it does not help us to get back an equal quantity of foreign +goods in exchange. We must have what we call "a favorable balance"; that +is, we must have other people going into debt to us, so that we can be +continually shipping out more goods than we take back; continually +piling up credits which we can "negotiate," or turn into cash, so that +we can go on and repeat the process of making more goods, selling them +for more profits, and putting the surplus into the form of more +machinery, to make still more goods and still more profits. + +And then, after a while, we come upon this embarrassing phenomenon; +nations which buy and do not sell must either do it by sending us gold, +or by our giving them credit. The sending of gold cannot go on +indefinitely, because then we should have all the gold, and if other +nations had none that would destroy their credit. On the other hand, +business cannot be done by credit indefinitely; for the very essence of +credit is a promise to pay, and payment can only be made in goods, and +how can we take the goods without ruining our own industry? + +Fifteen years ago I pointed this out in a book. The argument was +irrefutable, and the conclusion inescapable, but the few critics who +noted it repeated their usual formula about "dreamers and theorists." +Now, however, the business mills have ground on, and what was theory has +become fact before our eyes. We have trusted the nations of Europe for +some $10,000,000,000 worth of goods, and they are powerless to pay, and +if they did pay, they would bankrupt American industry. France wishes to +collect an enormous indemnity from Germany, but nobody can figure out +how this indemnity can be paid without ruining French industry. The +French have demanded coal from Germany, and have got more than they can +use, and are "dumping" it in Belgium and Holland, with the result that +the British coal industry is ruined. The French clamor that the Germans +must pay for the destruction they wrought in Northern France, and the +Germans offer to send German workmen to rebuild the ruined towns; but +the French denounce this as an insult--it would deprive French +workingmen of their jobs! So I might continue for pages, pointing out +the manifold absurdities which result from a system of industry for the +profit of a few, instead of for the use of all. + +Ever since I first began to read the newspapers, some twenty-five or +thirty years ago, all our political life has been nothing but the +convulsions of a social body tortured by the constricting ring of the +profit system. Everywhere one group struggling for advantage over +another group, and politicians engaged in playing one interest against +another interest! My boyhood recollections of public life consist of +campaign slogans having to do with the tariff: "production and +prosperity," "reciprocity," "the full dinner pail," "the foreigner pays +the tax," etc. + +The workingman, under the profit system, is like a man pounding away at +a pump. He can get a thin trickle of water from the spout of the pump if +he works hard enough, but in order to get it he has to supply ten times +as much to some one who has tapped the pipe. But the tapping has been +done underground, where the workingman cannot see it. All the workingman +knows is that there is no job for him if the products of "cheap foreign +labor" are allowed to be "dumped" on the American market. That is +obvious, and so he votes for a tax on foreign imports, high enough to +enable his own employer to market at a profit. He does not realize that +he is thus raising the price of everything that he buys, and so leaving +himself worse off than he was before. + +All governments are delighted with this tariff device, because they are +thus enabled to get money from the public without the public's knowing +it. "The foreigner pays the tax," we are told, and as a result of this +arrangement the steel trust just before the war was selling its product +at a high price to the American people, and taking its surplus abroad +and selling it to the foreigner at half the domestic price. And we see +this same thing in every line of manufacture, and all over the world. We +see one nation after another withdrawing itself as a market for +manufactured products, and entering the lists as a marketer. One more +nation now able to fill all its own needs, and going out hungrily to +look for foreign customers, adding to the glut of the world's +manufactured products and the ferocity of international competition! + +At the close of the Civil War the total exports of the United States +averaged approximately $300,000,000, and the total imports were about +the same. In 1892 the exports first touched $1,000,000,000, while the +imports were about nine-tenths of that sum. In the year 1913 the exports +were nearly $2,500,000,000, while the imports were $600,000,000 less; +and in the year 1920 our exports were over $8,000,000,000 and our +imports a little over $5,000,000,000! So we have a "favorable balance" +of almost $3,000,000,000 a year--and as a result we are on the verge of +ruin! + +This "iron ring" of overproduction and lack of market exercises upon our +industrial body a steady pressure, a slow strangling. But because the +body is in convulsions, struggling to break the ring, the pressure of +the ring is worse at some times than at others. We have periods of what +we call "prosperity," followed by periods of panic and hard times. You +must understand that only a small part of our business is done by means +of cash payments, whether in gold or silver or paper money. Close to 99% +of our business is done by means of credit, and this introduces into the +process a psychological factor. The business man expects certain +profits, and he capitalizes these expectations. Business booms, because +everybody believes everybody else's promises; credit expands like a huge +balloon, with the breath of everybody's enthusiasm. But meantime real +business, the real market, remains just what it was before; it cannot +increase, because of the iron ring which restricts the buying power of +the mass of the people by the competitive wage. So presently the time +comes when somebody realizes that he has over-capitalized his hopes; he +curtails his orders, he calls in his money, and the impulse thus started +precipitates a crash in the whole business world. We had such a crash in +1907, and I remember a Wall Street man explaining it in a magazine +article entitled, "Somebody Asked for a Dollar." + +We learned one lesson by that panic; at least, the big financial men +learned it, and had Congress pass what is called the "Federal Reserve +Act," a provision whereby in time of need the government issues +practically unlimited credit to banks. This, of course, is fine for the +banks; it puts the credit of everybody else behind them, and all they +have to do is to stop lending money--except to the big insiders--and sit +back and wait, while the little men go to the wall, and the mass of us +live on our savings or starve. We saw this happen in the year 1920, and +for the first time we had "hard times" without having a financial panic. +But instead we see prices staying high--because the banks have issued so +much paper money and bank credits. + + + + +CHAPTER LX + +CAPITALIST WAR + + (Shows how the competition for foreign markets leads nations + automatically into war.) + + +In a discussion of the world's economic situation, published in 1906, +the writer portrayed the ruling class of Germany as sitting in front of +a thermometer, watching the mercury rising, and knowing that when it +reached the top, the thermometer would break. This thermometer was the +German class system of government, and the mercury was the Socialist +vote. In 1870 the vote was 30,000, in 1884 it was 549,000, in 1893 it +was 1,876,000, in 1903 it was 3,008,000, in 1907 it was 3,250,000, in +1911 it was 4,250,000. Writing between 1906 and 1913, I again and again +pointed out that this increase was the symptom of social discontent in +Germany, caused by the overproduction of invested capital throughout the +world, and the intensification of the competition for world markets. I +pointed out that a slight increase in the vote would be sufficient to +transfer to the working class of Germany the political power of the +German state; and I said that the ruling class of Germany would never +permit that to happen--when it was ready to happen Germany would go to +war, to seize the trade privileges of some other nation. + +There was a time when wars were caused by national and racial hatreds. +There are still enough of these venerable prejudices left in the world, +but no student of the subject would deny that the main source of modern +wars is commercial rivalry. In 1917 we sent Eugene V. Debs to prison for +declaring that the late world war was a war of capitalist greed. But two +years later President Wilson, who had waged the war, declared in a +public speech that everybody knew it had been a war of commercial +rivalries. + +The aims of modern war-makers are two. First, capitalism must have raw +materials, including coal and oil, the sources of power, and gold and +silver, the bases of credit. Parts of the world which are so unfortunate +as to be rich in these substances become the bone of contention between +rival financial groups, organized as nations. Some sarcastic writer has +defined a "backward" nation as one which has gold mines and no navy. We +are horrified to read of the wars of the French monarchs, caused by the +jealous quarrels of mistresses; but in 1905 we saw Russia and Japan go +to war and waste a million lives because certain Russian grand dukes had +bribed certain Chinese mandarins and obtained concessions of timber on +the Yalu River. We now observe France and Germany vowed to undying hate +because of iron mines in Lorraine, and the efforts of France to take the +coal mines of Silesia from Germany, and give them to Poland, which is +another name for French capitalism. + +The other end sought by the war-makers is markets for manufactured +products, and control of trade routes, coaling stations and cables +necessary to the building up of foreign trade. England has been +"mistress of the seas" for some 300 years, which meant that her traders +had obtained most of these advantages. But then came Germany, with her +newly developed commercialism, shoving her rival out of the way. The +Englishman was easy-going; he liked to play cricket, and stop and drink +tea every afternoon. But the German worked all day and part of the +night; he trained himself as a specialist, he studied the needs of his +customers--all of which to the Englishman was "unfair" competition. But +here were the populations of the crowded slums, dependent for their +weekly wage and their daily bread upon the ability of the factories to +go on turning out products! Here was the ever-blackening shadow of +unemployment, the mutterings of social discontent, the agitators on the +soap-boxes, the workers listening to them with more and more eager +attention, and the journalists and politicians and bankers watching this +phenomenon with a ghastly fear. + +So came the great war. Social discontent was forgotten over night, and +England and France plunged in to down their hated rival, once and for +all time. Now they have succeeded: Germany's ships have been taken from +her, and likewise her cables and coaling stations; the Berlin-Bagdad +Railroad is a forgotten dream; the British sit in Constantinople, and +the traffic goes by sea. American capitalism wakes up, and rubs its eyes +after a debauch of Presbyterian idealism, and discovers that it has paid +out some $20,000,000,000, in order to confer all these privileges and +advantages upon its rivals! + +Ever since I can remember the world, there have been peace societies; I +look back in history and discover that ever since there have been wars, +there have been prophets declaiming against them in the name of +humanity and God. As I write, there is a great world conference on +disarmament in session in Washington, and all good Americans hope that +war is to be ended and permanent peace made safe. All that I can do at +this juncture is to point out the fundamental and all-controlling fact +of present-day economics: that for the ruling class of any country to +agree to disarmament and the abolition of war, is for that class to sign +its own death warrant and cut its own throat. American capitalism can +survive on this earth only by strangling and destroying Japanese +capitalism and British capitalism, and doing it before long. The +far-sighted capitalists on both sides know that, and are making their +preparations accordingly. + +What the members of the peace societies and the diplomats of the +disarmament conferences do is to cut off the branches of the tree of +war. They leave the roots untouched, and then, when the tree continues +to thrive, they are astounded. I conclude this chapter with a concrete +illustration, cut from my morning newspaper. We went to war against +German militarism, and to make the world safe for democracy--meaning +thereby capitalist commercialism. We commanded the German people to +"beat their swords into plough-shares"; that is, to set their Krupp +factories to making tools of peace; and they did so. We saddled them +with an enormous indemnity, making them our serfs for a generation or +two, and compelling them to hasten out into the world markets, to sell +their goods and raise gold to pay us. And now, how does their behavior +strike us? Do we praise their industry, and fidelity to their +obligations? Here are the headlines of a news despatch, published by the +Los Angeles Times on December 10, 1921, at the top of the front page, +right hand column, the most conspicuous position in the paper. Read it, +and understand the sources of modern war! + + _NEW ATTACK BY BERLIN_ + + * * * * * + + DUMPING GOODS BY WHOLESALE + + * * * * * + +Cheap German Trash Puts Thousands of Americans Out of Employment + + * * * * * + + Glove Plants Shut Down and Potash Industry Killed + by Teuton Intrigue + + + + +CHAPTER LXI + +THE POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCTION + + (Shows how much wealth we could produce if we tried, and how we + proved it when we had to.) + + +One of the commonest arguments in defense of the present business system +runs as follows: The amount of money which is paid to labor is greatly +in excess of the amount which is paid to capital. Suppose that tomorrow +you were to abolish all dividends and profits, and divide the money up +among the wage workers, how much would each one get? The sum is figured +for some big industry, and it is shown that each worker would get one or +two hundred dollars additional per year. Obviously, this would not bring +the millennium; it would hardly be worth while to take the risk of +reducing production in order to gain so small a result. + +But now we are in position to realize the fallacy of such an argument. +The tax which capital levies upon labor is not the amount which capital +takes for itself, but the amount which it prevents labor from producing. +The real injury of the profit system is not that it pays so large a +reward to a ruling class; it is the "iron ring" which it fastens about +industry, barring the workers from access to the machinery of production +except when the product can be sold for a profit. Labor pays an enormous +reward to the business man for his management of industry, but it would +pay labor to reward the business man even more highly, if only he would +take his goods in kind, and would permit labor, after this tax is paid, +to go on making those things which labor itself so desperately needs. + +But, you see, the business man does not take his goods in kind. The +owner of a great automobile factory may make for himself one automobile +or a score of automobiles, but he quickly comes to a limit where he has +no use for any more, and what he wants is to sell automobiles and "make +money." He does not permit his workers to make automobiles for +themselves, or for any one else. He reserves the product of the factory +for himself, and when he can no longer sell automobiles at a profit, he +shuts the workers out and automobile-making comes to an end in that +community. Thus it appears that the "iron ring" which strangles the +income of labor, strangles equally the income of capital. It paralyzes +the whole social body, and so limits production that we can form no +conception of what prosperity might and ought to be. + +Consider the situation before the war. We were all of us at work under +the competitive system, and with the exception of a few parasites, +everybody was occupied pretty close to the limit of his energy. If any +one had said that it would be possible for our community to pitch in and +double or treble our output, you would have laughed at him. But suddenly +we found ourselves at war, and in need of a great increase in output, +and we resolved one and all to achieve this end. We did not waste any +time in theoretical discussions about the rights of private capital, or +the dangers of bureaucracy and the destruction of initiative. Our +government stepped in and took control; it took the railroads and +systematized them, it took the big factories and told them exactly what +to make, it took the raw materials and allotted them, where they were +needed, it fixed the prices of labor, and ordered millions of men to +this or that place, to this or that occupation. It even seized the +foodstuffs and directed what people should eat. In a thousand ways it +suppressed competition and replaced it by order and system. And what was +the result? + +We took five million of our young men, the very cream of our industrial +force, and withdrew them from all productive activities; we put them +into uniforms, and put them through a training which meant that they +were eating more food and wearing more clothing and consuming more goods +than nine-tenths of them had ever done in their lives before. We built +camps for them, and supplied them with all kinds of costly products of +labor, such as guns and cartridges, automobiles and airplanes. We +treated two million of them to an expensive trip to Europe, and there we +set them to work burning up and destroying the products of industry, to +the value of many billions of dollars. And not only did we supply our +own armies, we supplied the armies of all our allies. We built millions +of dollars worth of ships, and we sent over to Europe, whether by +private business or by government loans, some $10,000,000,000 worth of +goods--more than ten years of our exports before the war. + +All the labor necessary to produce all this wealth had to be withdrawn +from industry, so far as concerned our domestic uses and needs. It would +not be too much to say that from domestic industry we withdrew a total +of ten million of our most capable labor force. I think it would be +reasonable to say that two-thirds of our productive energies went to war +purposes, and only one-third was available for home use. And yet, we did +it without a particle of real suffering. Many of us worked hard, but few +of us worked harder than usual. Most of us got along with less wheat and +sugar, but nobody starved, nobody really suffered ill health, and our +poor made higher wages and had better food than ever in their lives +before. If this argument is sound, it proves that our productive +machinery is capable, when properly organized and directed, of producing +three times the common necessities of our population. Assuming that our +average working day is nine hours, we could produce what we at present +consume by three hours of intelligently directed work per day. + +Let us look at the matter from another angle. Just at present the hero +of the American business man is Herbert Hoover; and Mr. Hoover recently +appointed a committee, not of Socialists and "Utopians," but of +engineering experts, to make a study of American productive methods. The +report showed that American industry was only thirty-five or forty per +cent efficient. Incidentally, this "Committee on Waste" assessed, in the +case of the building industry, sixty-five per cent of the blame against +management and only twenty-one per cent against labor; in six +fundamental industries it assessed fifty per cent of the blame against +management and less than twenty-five per cent against labor. Fifteen +years ago a professor of engineering, Sidney A. Reeve by name, made an +elaborate study of the wastes involved in our haphazard and planless +industrial methods, and embodied his findings in a book, "The Cost of +Competition." His conclusion was that of the total amount of energy +expended in America, more than seventy per cent was wasted. We were +doing one hundred per cent of work and getting thirty per cent of +results. If we would get one hundred per cent of results, we should +produce three and one-third times as much wealth, and the income of our +workers would be increased one or two thousand dollars a year. + +Robert Blatchford in his book, "Merrie England," has a saying to the +effect that it makes all the difference, when half a dozen men go out to +catch a horse, whether they spend their time catching the horse or +keeping one another from catching the horse. Our next task will be to +point out a few of the ways in which good, honest American business men +and workingmen, laboring as intelligently and conscientiously as they +know how, waste their energies in keeping one another from producing +goods. + + + + +CHAPTER LXII + +THE COST OF COMPETITION + + (Discusses the losses of friction in our productive machine, those + which are obvious and those which are hidden.) + + +The United States government is by far the largest single business +enterprise in the United States; and a study of congressional +appropriations in 1920, made by the United States Bureau of Standards, +reveals the fact that ninety-three per cent of the total income of the +government went to paying for past wars or preparing for future wars. We +have shown that modern war is a product of the profit system, and if +civilized nations would put their industry upon a co-operative basis, +they could forget the very idea of war, and we should then receive +fourteen times as much benefit from our government as we receive at +present; we should have fourteen times as good roads, fourteen times as +many schools, fourteen times as prompt a postoffice and fourteen times +as efficient a Congress. What it would mean to industry to abolish war +is something wholly beyond the power of our imagination to conceive; for +along with ninety-three per cent of our government money there goes into +military preparation the vast bulk of our intellectual energy and +inventive genius, our moral and emotional equipment. + +Next, strikes and the losses incidental to strikes, and the costs of +preparing against strikes. This includes, not merely the actual loss of +working time, it includes police and militia, private armies of gunmen, +and great secret service agencies, whose total income runs up into +hundreds of millions of dollars per year. Industrial warfare is simply +the method by which capitalists and workers determine the division of +the product of industry; as if two men should co-operate in raising +poultry, and then fall to quarrelling over the ownership of the eggs, +and settle the matter by throwing the eggs at each other's heads. + +Next, bankruptcy. Statistics show that regularly some ten per cent of +our business enterprises fail every year. Take any block occupied by +little business men, grocers and haberdashers and "notions," and you +will see that they are always changing. Each change represents a human +tragedy, and the total is a frightful waste of human energy; it happens +because we can think of no better way to distribute goods than to go +through the work of setting up a business, and then discover that it +cannot succeed because the neighborhood is already overstocked with that +kind of goods. + +Next, fires which are a result of bankruptcy. You may laugh, perhaps, +thinking that I am making a joke; but every little man who fails in +business knows that he has a choice of going down in the social scale, +or of setting fire to his stock some night, and having a big insurance +company set him on his feet again. The result is that a certain +percentage of bankrupts do regularly set fire to their stores. Some +fifteen years ago there was published in "Collier's Weekly" a study of +the costs to society of incendiary fires. The Fire Underwriters' +Association estimated the amount as a quarter of a billion dollars a +year; and all this cost, you understand, is paid out of the pockets of +those who insure their homes and their stores, and do not burn them +down. + +From this follows the costs of insurance, and the whole insurance +industry, which is inevitable under the profit system, but is entire +waste so far as true production is concerned. Big enterprises like the +Steel Trust do not carry insurance, and neither does the United States +Postoffice. They are wealthy enough to stand their own losses. A +national co-operative enterprise would be in the same position, and the +whole business of collecting money for insurance and keeping records and +carrying on lawsuits would be forgotten. + +Next, advertising. It would be no exaggeration to say that seventy per +cent of the material published in American newspapers and magazines +today is pure waste; and therefore seventy per cent of the labor of all +the people who cut down forests and manufacture and transport paper and +set up type and print and distribute publications is wasted. There is, +of course, a small percentage of advertising that is useful, but most of +it is boasting and falsehood, and even where it tells the truth it +simply represents the effort of a merchant to persuade you to buy in his +store instead of in a rival store--an achievement which is profitable to +the merchant, but utterly useless to society as a whole. + +This same statement applies to all traveling salesmen, and to a great +percentage of middlemen. It applies also to a great part of delivery +service. If you live in a crowded part of any city, you see a dozen milk +wagons pass your door every morning, doing the work which could be done +exactly as well by one. That is only one case out of a thousand I might +name. + +Next, crime. I have already discussed the crime of arson, and I might +discuss the crimes of pocket-picking, burglary, forgery, and a hundred +others in the same way. I am aware of the fact that there may be a few +born criminals; there may be a few congenital cheats, whom we should +have to put in hospitals. But we have only to consult the crime records, +during the war and after the war, in order to see that when jobs are +hunting men there are few criminals, and when men are hunting jobs there +are many criminals. I have no figures as to the cost of administering +justice in the United States--policemen, courts and jails--but it must +be hundreds of millions of dollars every year. + +I have discussed at great length the suppression of the productive power +of society. I should not fail to mention the suppression of the +inventive power of society, a factor less obvious, but probably in the +long run even greater. Every one familiar with the inside of a big +industry knows that hundreds and even thousands of useful processes are +entirely suppressed, because it would not pay one particular concern to +stand the expense of the changes involved. You know how, during the war, +our government brought all the makers of engines together and perfected +in triumph a "Liberty motor." But now we have gone back to private +interest and competition, and each concern is jealously engaged in +guarding its own secrets, and depriving industry as a whole of the +benefit of everything that it learns. Each is spying upon the others, +stealing the secrets of the others, stealing likewise from those who +invent new ideas--and thus discouraging them from inventing any more. + +I use this word "discourage," and I might write a chapter upon it. What +human imagination can conceive the amount of social energy that is lost +because of the factor of discouragement, directly caused by the +competitive method? Who can figure what it means to human society that a +great percentage of the people in it should be haunted by fear of one +sort or another--the poor in fear of unemployment, sickness and +starvation, the little business man in fear of bankruptcy and suicide, +the big business man in fear of hard times and treachery of his +competitors, the idle rich in fear of robbery and blackmail, and the +whole community in fear of foreign war and domestic tumult! + +Anyone might go on and elaborate these factors that I have named, and +think of scores of others. Anyone familiar with business life or with +industrial processes would be able to put his finger on this or that +enormous saving which he would be able to make if he and all his rivals +could combine and come to an agreement. This has been proven over and +over again in large-scale industry; it is the fact which has made of +large-scale industry an overwhelming power, sucking all the profits to +itself, reaching out and taking in new fields of human activity, and +setting at naught all popular clamor and even legal terrors. How can +anyone, seeing these facts, bring himself to deny that if we did +systematize production and make it one enterprise, precisely adapted to +one end, we should enormously increase the results of human labor, and +the benefit to all who do the world's work? + +A good deal of this waste we can stop when we get ready, and other parts +of it our bountiful mother nature will replace. When in a world war we +kill some ten or twenty millions of the flower of our young manhood, we +have only to wait several generations, and our race will be as good as +ever. But, on the other hand, there is some waste that can never be +repaired, and this is the thing truly frightful to contemplate. When we +dig the iron ore out of the bowels of the earth and rust it away in +wars, we are doing something our race can never undo. And the same is +true of many of our precious substances: phosphorus, sulphur, potash. +When we cut down the forests from our mountain slopes, and lay bare the +earth, we not merely cause floods and washouts, and silt up our harbors, +we take away from the surface of our land the precious life-giving soil, +and make a habitable land into a desert, which no irrigating and +reforesting can ever completely restore. The Chinese have done that for +many centuries, and we are following in their footsteps; more than six +hundred million wagon-loads of our best soil are washed down to the sea +every year! If you wish to know about these matters, I send you to a +book, "On Board the Good Ship Earth," by Herbert Quick. It is one of the +most heart-breaking books you ever read, yet it is merely a quiet +statement of the facts about our present commercial anarchy. + + + + +CHAPTER LXIII + +SOCIALISM AND SYNDICALISM + + (Discusses the idea of the management of industry by the state, and + the idea of its management by the trade unions.) + + +Let us now assume that we desire to abolish the wastes of the +competitive method, and to put our industry on a basis of co-operation. +How should we effect the change, and how should we run our industry +after it was done? + +Let us take the United States Steel Corporation. What change would be +necessary to the socializing of this concern? United States Steel is +owned by a group of stockholders, and governed by a board of directors +elected by them. The owners are now to be bought out with government +bonds, and the board of directors retired. It may also be necessary to +replace a certain number of the higher executive officials, who are +imbued entirely with the point of view of this board, and have to do +with finance, rather than with production. Of course, some other +governing authority would have to be put in control. What would this +authority be? There are several plans before the world, several +different schools of thought, which we shall consider one by one. + +First, the Socialist program. The Socialist says, "Consider the +postoffice, how that is run. It is run by the President, who appoints a +Postmaster-General as his executive. Let us therefore turn the steel +industry over to the government, and let the President appoint another +member of his cabinet, a Director of Steel; or let there be a +commission, similar to the Interstate Commerce Commission, or the +various war industry boards." Any form of management of the steel +industry which provides for its control and operation by our United +States government is Socialism of one sort or another. + +There has been, of late, a great deal of dissatisfaction with +government, on the part of the general public, and also of labor. The +postoffice clerks, for example, complain that they are inadequately paid +and autocratically managed, deprived of their rights not merely as +workers but as citizens. The steel workers complain that when they go on +strike against their masters, the government sends in troops and +crushes their strike, regardless of the rights or wrongs of it. In order +to meet such tactics, labor goes into politics, and elects here and +there its own representatives; but these representatives become +mysteriously affected by the bureaucratic point of view, and even where +they try hard, they do not accomplish much for labor. Therefore, labor +becomes disgusted with the political process, and labor men do not +welcome the prospect of being managed by government. + +If you ask such men, they will say: "No; the politicians don't know +anything about industry, and can't learn. The people who know about +industry are those who work in it. The true way to run an industry is +through an organization of the workers, both of hand and brain. The true +way to run the Steel Trust is for all the workers in it, men and women, +high and low, to be recognized by law as citizens of that industry; each +shop must elect its own delegates to run that shop, and elect a delegate +to a central parliament of the industry, and this industry in turn must +elect delegates to a great parliament or convention of all the delegates +of all the industries. In such a central gathering every one would be +represented, because every person would be a producer of some sort, and +whether he was a steel worker or a street sweeper or a newsboy, he would +have a vote at the place where he earns his living, and would have a say +in the management of his job. The great central parliament would elect +an executive committee and a president, and so we should have a +government of the workers, by the workers, for the workers." This idea +is known as Syndicalism, derived from the French word "syndicat," +meaning a labor union. Since the Russian revolution it has come to be +known as soviet government, "soviet" being the Russian word for trade +council. + +Now, taking these two ideas of Socialism and Syndicalism, it is evident +that they may be combined in various ways, and applied in varying +degrees. It is perfectly conceivable, for example, that the people of +the United States might elect a president pledged to call a parliament +of industry, and to delegate the control of industry to this parliament. +He might delegate the control to a certain extent, and provide for its +extension, step by step; so our society might move into Syndicalism by +the way of Socialism. You have only to put your mind on the +possibilities of the situation to realize that one method shades into +the other with a great variety of stages. + +Consider next the stages between capitalism and Socialism. We have in +the United States some industries which are purely capitalistic; for +example, the Steel Trust, which is privately owned, and has been +powerful enough, not merely to suppress every effort of its workers to +organize, but every effort of the government to regulate it. On the +other hand, the United States Postoffice represents State Socialism; +although the workers have been forbidden to organize, and the management +of the industry is so arbitrary that I have always preferred to call it +State Capitalism. Likewise the United States army and navy represent +State Socialism. When we had the job of putting the Kaiser out of +business, we did not hire Mr. Rockefeller to do it; it never once +occurred to our advocates of "individualism," of "capitalist enterprise +and initiative," to suggest that we should hire out our army and navy, +or employ the Steel Trust or the Powder Trust to organize its own army +and navy to do the fighting for us. Likewise, for the most part, we run +the job of educating our children by the method of municipal Socialism. +We run our libraries in the same way, and likewise our job of fire +protection. + +It is interesting to note how in every country the line between +capitalism and Socialism is drawn in a different place. In America we +run practically all our libraries for ourselves, but it would seem to us +preposterous to think of running our theatres. In Europe, however, they +have state-owned theatres, which set a far higher standard of art than +anything we know at home. Also, they have state-owned orchestras and +opera-houses, something we Americans leave to the subscriptions of +millionaires. In Europe it seems perfectly natural to the people that +the state should handle their telegrams in connection with the +postoffice; but if you urge government ownership of the telegraphs in +the United States, they tell you that the proposition is "socialistic," +and that saves the need of thinking about it. We take it for granted +that our cities could run the libraries--even though we were glad when +Carnegie came along and saved us the need of appropriating money for +buildings. Just why a city should be able to run a library, and should +not be able to run an opera-house, or a newspaper, is something which +has never been made clear to me. + +Let us next examine the stages between capitalism and Syndicalism. A +great many large corporations are making experiments in what they call +"shop management," allowing the workers membership in the boards of +directors and a voice in the conditions of their labor. This is +Syndicalism so far as it goes. Likewise it is Syndicalism when the +clothing workers and the clothing manufacturers meet together and agree +to the setting up of a permanent committee to work out a set of rules +for the conduct of the industry, and to fix wages from time to time. +Obviously, these things are capable of indefinite extension, and in +Europe they are being developed far more rapidly. For example, in Italy +the agricultural workers are organized, and are gradually taking +possession of the great estates, which are owned by absentee landlords. +They wage war upon these estates by means of sabotage and strikes, and +then they buy up the estates at bargain prices and develop them by +co-operative labor. This has been going on in Italy for ten years, and +has become the most significant movement in the country. It is a triumph +of pure Syndicalism; and such is the power of pure capitalism in the +United States that the American people have not been allowed to know +anything about this change. + +Next, what are the stages between Socialism and Syndicalism? These also +are infinite in number and variety. As a matter of fact, there are very +few Socialists who advocate State Socialism without any admixture of +Syndicalism. The regular formula of the Socialist party is "the social +ownership and democratic control of the instruments and means of +production;" and what the phrase "democratic control" means is simply +that you introduce into your Socialist mixture a certain flavoring of +Syndicalism, greater or less, according to your temperament. In the same +way there are many Syndicalists who are inclined toward Socialism. In +every convention of radical trade unionists, such as, for example, the +I. W. W., you find some who favor political action, and these will have +the same point of view as the more radical members of the Socialist +party, who urge a program of industrial as well as political action. + + + + +CHAPTER LXIV + +COMMUNISM AND ANARCHISM + + (Considers the idea of goods owned in common, and the idea of a + society without compulsion, and how these ideas have fared in + Russia.) + + +The Russian revolution has familiarized us with the word Communism. In +the beginning of the revolutionary movement Communism denoted what we +now call Socialism; for example, the Communist Manifesto of Marx and +Engels became the platform of the Social-democratic parties. But because +most of these parties supported their governments during the war, the +more radical elements have now rejected the word Socialism, and taken up +the old word Communism. In the Russian revolution the Communists went so +far as to seize all the property of the rich, and so the word Communism +has come to bear something of its early Christian significance. + +It is obvious that here, too, it is a question of degree, and Socialism +will shade into Communism by an infinite variety of stages, depending +upon what forms of property it is decided to socialize. The Socialist +formula commonly accepted is that "goods socially used shall be socially +owned, and goods privately used shall be privately owned." If you own a +factory, it will be taken by the state, or by the workers, and made +social property like the postoffice; but no Socialist wants to socialize +your clothing, or your books, any more than he wants to socialize your +toothbrush. + +But when you come to apply this formula, you run quickly into +difficulties. Suppose you are a millionaire, and own a palace with one +or two hundred rooms, and a hundred servants. Do you use that socially, +or do you use it privately? And suppose there is a scarcity of houses, +and thousands of children are dying of tuberculosis in crowded tenement +rooms? You own a dozen automobiles, and do you use them all privately? I +point out to you that in time of emergency the capitalist state does not +hesitate over such a problem; it seizes your palace and turns it into a +hospital, it takes all your cars and uses them to carry troops. It +should be obvious that a proletarian state would be tempted by this +precedent. + +The Communists also have a formula, which reads: "From each according to +his ability, to each according to his necessity." I do not see how any +sensitive person can deny that this is an extremely fine statement of an +ideal in social life. We take it quite for granted in family life; if +you knew a family in which that rule did not apply, you would consider +it an unloving and uncivilized family. I believe that when once industry +has been socialized, and we have a chance to see what production can +become, we shall find ourselves quickly adopting that family custom as +our law, for all except a few congenital criminals and cheats. We shall +find that we can produce so much wealth that it is not worth while +keeping count of unimportant items. If today you meet someone on the +street and ask him for a match or a pin, you do not think of offering to +pay him. This is an automatic consequence of the cheapness of matches +and pins. Once upon a time you were stopped on the road every few miles +and made to pay a few cents toll. I remember seeing toll-gates when I +was a boy, but I don't think I have seen one for twenty years. + +In exactly the same way, under socialized industry, we shall probably +make street-car traffic free, and then railroad traffic; we shall +abolish water meters and gas meters and electric light meters, also +telephone charges, except perhaps for long distances, and telegraph +tolls for personal messages. Then, presently, we shall find ourselves +with such a large wheat crop that we shall make bread free; and then +music and theatres and clothing and books. At present we use furniture +and clothing as a means of manifesting our economic superiority to our +fellowmen. One of the most charming books in our language is Veblen's +"Theory of the Leisure Class," in which these processes are studied. We +shall, of course, have to raise up a new generation, unaccustomed to the +idea of class and of class distinction, before we could undertake to +supply people with all the clothing they wanted free of charge. + +The Russian theorists made haste to carry out these ideas all at once; +they tried to leap several centuries in the evolution of Russian +society. They ordained complete Communism in land; but the peasants +would have nothing to do with such notions--each wanted his own land, +and what he produced on it. The Soviets have now been forced to give +way, not merely to the peasants, but to the traders; and so we see once +again that it is better to take one step forward than to take several +steps forward and then several steps backward. The Russian revolution +is not yet completed, so no one can say how many steps backward it will +be forced to take. + +This revolution was an interesting combination of the ideas of Socialism +and Syndicalism. The trade unionists seized the factories, and made an +effort at democratic control of industry. At the same time the state was +overthrown by a political party, the Bolsheviks, who set up a +dictatorship of the proletariat. Because of civil war and outside +invasion, the democratic elements in the experiment have been more and +more driven into the background, and the authority of the state has +correspondingly increased. This causes us to think of the Soviet system +as necessarily opposed to democracy, but this is not in any way a +necessary thing. There is no inevitable connection between industrial +control by the workers and a dictatorship over the state. In Germany the +state is proceeding to organize a national parliament of industry, and +to provide for management of the factories by the labor unions. The +Italian government has promised to do the same thing. These, of course, +are capitalist governments, and they will keep their promises only as +they are made to; but it is a perfectly possible thing that in either of +these countries a vote of the people might change the government, and +put in authority men who would really proceed to turn industry over to +the control of the workers. That would be the Soviet or Syndicalist +system, brought about by democratic means, without dictatorship or civil +war. + +Another group of revolutionary thinkers whose theories must be mentioned +are the Anarchists. The word Anarchy is commonly used as a synonym for +chaos and disorder, which it does not mean at all. It means the absence +of authority; and it is characteristic of people's view of life that +they are unable to conceive of there being such a thing as order, unless +it is maintained by force. The theory of the Anarchist is that order is +a necessity of the human spirit, and that people would conform to the +requirements of a just order by their own free will and without external +compulsion. The Anarchist believes that the state is an instrument of +class oppression, and has no other reason for being. He wishes the +industries to be organized by free associations of the people who work +in them. + +Some of the greatest of the world's moral teachers have been Anarchists: +Jesus, for example, and Shelley and Thoreau and Tolstoi, and in our time +Kropotkin. These men voiced the highest aspirations of the human +spirit, and the form of society which they dreamed is the one we set +before us as our final goal. But the world does not leap into perfection +all at once, and meantime here we have the capitalist system and the +capitalist state, and what attitude shall we take to them? There are +impassioned idealists who refuse to make any terms with injustice, or to +submit to compulsion, and these preach the immediate destruction of +capitalist government, and capitalist government responds with prison +and torture, and so we have some Anarchists who throw bombs. + +There are those who call themselves "philosophic" Anarchists, wishing to +indicate thereby that they preach this doctrine, but do not attempt to +carry it into action as yet. Some among these verge toward the Communist +point of view, and call themselves Communist-anarchists; such was +Kropotkin, whose theories of social organization you will find in his +book "The Conquest of Bread." There are others who call themselves +Syndicalist-anarchists, finding their centers of free association in the +radical labor unions. + +After the Russian revolution, the Anarchists found themselves in a +dilemma, and their groups were torn apart like every other party and +class in Russia. Here was a new form of state set up in society, a +workers' state, and what attitude should the Anarchists take toward +that? Many of them stood out for their principles, and resisted the +Bolshevik state, and put the Bolsheviks under the embarrassing necessity +of throwing them into jail. We good orthodox Americans, who are +accustomed to dump Socialists and Communists and Syndicalists and +Anarchists all together into one common kettle, took Emma Goldman and +Alexander Berkman and shipped them over to Russia, where we thought they +belonged. Now our capitalist newspapers find it strange that these +Anarchists do not like the Russian government any better than they like +the American government! + +On the other hand, a great many Anarchists have suddenly found +themselves compelled by the Russian situation to face the facts of life. +They have decided that a government is not such a bad thing after +all--when it is your own government! Robert Minor, for example, has +recanted his Anarchist position, and joined the Communists in advocating +the dropping of all differences among the workers, all theories as to +the future, and concentrating upon the immediate task of overthrowing +capitalist government and keeping it overthrown. In every civilized +nation the Russian revolution has had this effect upon the extreme +revolutionists. It has given them a definite aim and a definite program +upon which they can unite; it has presented to capitalist government the +answer of force to force; it has shown the masters of industry in +precise and definite form what they have to face--unless they set +themselves immediately and in good faith to the task of establishing +real democracy in industry. + + + + +CHAPTER LXV + +SOCIAL REVOLUTION + + (How the great change is coming in different industries, and how we + may prepare to meet it.) + + +From a study of the world's political revolutions we observe that a +variety of governmental forms develop, and that different circumstances +in each country produce different institutions. Suppose that back in the +days of the French monarchy some one asked you how France was going to +be governed as a political republic; how would elections be held, what +would be the powers of the deputies, who would choose the premier, who +would choose the president, what would be the duties of each? Who can +explain why in France and England the executive is responsible to the +parliament and must answer its questions, while in the United States the +executive is an autocrat, responsible to no one for four years? Who +could have foreseen that in England, supposed to remain a monarchy, the +constitution would be fluid; while in America, supposed to be a +democracy, the constitution would be rigid, and the supreme power of +rejecting changes in the laws would be vested in a group of reactionary +lawyers appointed for life? There will be similar surprises in the +social revolution, and similar differences between what things pretend +to be and what they are. + +I used to compare the social revolution to the hatching of an egg. You +examine it, and apparently it is all egg; but then suddenly something +begins to happen, and in a few minutes it is all chicken. If, however, +you investigate, you discover that the chicken had been forming inside +the egg for some time. I know that there is a chicken now forming inside +our social egg; but having realized the complexity of social phenomena, +I no longer venture to predict the exact time of the hatching, or the +size and color of the chicken. + +Perhaps it is more useful to compare the social revolution to a +child-birth. A good surgeon knows what is due to happen, but he knows +also that there are a thousand uncertainties, a thousand dangerous +possibilities, and all he can do is to watch the process and be prepared +to meet each emergency as it arises. The birth process consists of one +pang after another, but no one can say which pang will complete the +birth, or whether it will be completed at all. Karl Marx is author of +the saying that "force is the midwife of progress," so you may see that +I am not the inventor of this simile of child-birth. + +There are three factors in the social revolution, each of which will +vary in each country, and in different parts of the country, and at +different periods. First, there is the industrial condition of the +country, a complex set of economic factors. The industrial life of +England depends primarily on shipping and coal. In the United States +shipping is of less importance, and railroads take the place. In the +United States the eastern portion lives mainly by manufacture, the +western by agriculture, while the south is held a generation behind by a +race problem. In France the great estates were broken up, and +agriculture fell into the hands of peasant proprietors, who are the main +support of French capitalism. In Prussia the great estates were held +intact, and remained the basis of a feudal aristocracy. In America land +changes hands freely, and therefore one-third of our farms are +mortgaged, and another third are worked by tenants. In Russia there was +practically no middle class, while in the United States there is +practically nothing but middle class; the rich have been rich for such a +short while that they still look middle class and act middle class, in +spite of all their efforts, while the working class hopes to be middle +class and is persuaded that it can become middle class. Such varying +factors produce in each country a different problem, and make inevitable +a different process of change. + +The second factor is the condition of organization and education of the +workers. This likewise varies in every country, and in every part of +every country. There is a continual struggle on the part of the workers +to organize and educate themselves, and a continual effort on the part +of the ruling class to prevent this. In some industries in America you +find the workers one hundred per cent organized, and in other industries +you find them not organized at all. It is obvious that in the former +case the social change, when it comes, will be comparatively simple, +involving little bloodshed and waste; in the latter case there will be +social convulsions, rioting and destruction of property, disorganization +of industry and widespread distress. + +The third factor is the state of mind of the propertied classes, the +amount of resistance they are willing to make to social change. I have +done a great deal of pleading with the masters of industry in my +country; I have written appeals to Vincent Astor and John D. +Rockefeller, to capitalist newspapers and judges and congressmen and +presidents. I have been told that this is a waste of my time; that these +people cannot learn and will not learn, and that it is foolish to appeal +either to their hearts or their understanding. But I perceive that the +class struggle is like a fraction; it has a numerator and a denominator, +and you can increase the fraction just as well by decreasing the +denominator as by increasing the numerator. To vary the simile, here are +two groups of men engaged in a tug of war, and you can affect the result +just as decisively by persuading one group to pull less hard, as by +persuading the other group to pull harder. + +Picture to yourself two factories. In factory number one the owner is a +hard-driving business man, an active spirit in the so-called "open-shop" +campaign. He believes in his divine right to manage industry, and he +believes also in the gospel of "all that the traffic will bear." He +prevents his men from organizing, and employs spies to weed out the +radicals and to sow dissensions. When a strike comes, he calls in the +police and the strike-breaking agencies, and in every possible way he +makes himself hated and feared by his workers. Then some day comes the +unemployment crisis, and a wave of revolt sweeping over the country. The +workers seize that factory and set up a dictatorship of the proletariat +and a "red terror." If the owner resists, they kill him; in any case, +they wipe out his interest in the business, and do everything possible +to destroy his power over it, even to his very name. They run the +business by a shop committee, and you have for that particular factory a +Syndicalist, or even Anarchist form of social reconstruction. + +Now for factory number two, whose owner is a humane and enlightened man, +studying social questions and realizing his responsibility, and the +temporary nature of his stewardship. He gives his people the best +possible working conditions, he keeps open books and discusses wages and +profits with them, he educates the young workers, he meets with their +union committees on a basis of free discussion. When the unemployment +crisis comes and the wave of revolt sweeps the country, this man and his +workers understand one another. He says: "I can no longer pay profits, +and so I can no longer keep going under the profit system; but if you +are ready to run the plant, I am ready to help you the best I can." +Manifestly, this man will continue the president of the corporation, and +if he trains his sons wisely, they will keep his place; so, instead of +having in that factory a dictatorship and a terror, you will have a +constitutional monarchy, gradually evolving into a democratic republic. + + + + +CHAPTER LXVI + +CONFISCATION OR COMPENSATION + + (Shall the workers buy out the capitalists? Can they afford to do + it, and what will be the price?) + + +The problem of whether the social revolution shall be violent or +peaceable depends in great part upon our answer to the question of +confiscation versus compensation. We are now going to consider, first, +the abstract rights and wrongs of the question, and, second, the +practical aspects of it. + +There is a story very popular among single taxers and other advocates of +freedom of the land. An English land-owner met a stranger walking on his +estate, and rebuked him for trespassing. Said the stranger, "You own +this land?" Said the other, "I do." "And how did you get it?" "I +inherited it from my father." "And how did your father get it?" "He +inherited it from his father." So on for half a dozen more ancestors, +until at last the Englishman answered, "He fought for it." Whereupon the +stranger took off his coat and rolled up his sleeves and said, "I'll +fight you for it." + +This is all there is to say on the subject of the abstract rights of +land titles. There is no title to land which is valid on a historical +basis. Everything rests upon fraud and force, continued through endless +ages of human history. We in the United States took most of our land +from the Indians, and in the process our guiding rule was that the only +good Injun was a dead Injun. We first helped the English kings to take +large sections of our country from the French and Spanish, and then we +took them from the English king by a violent revolution. We purchased +our Southwestern states from Mexico, but not until we had taken the +precaution of killing some thousands of Mexicans in war, which had the +effect of keeping down the purchase price. It would be a simple matter +to show that all public franchises are similarly tainted with fraud. +Proudhon laid down the principle that "property is theft," and from this +principle it is an obvious conclusion that society has the right to +scrap all paper titles to wealth, and to start the world's industries +over again on the basis of share and share alike. + +But stop and consider for a moment. "Property is theft," you say. But go +to your corner grocery, and tell the grocer that you deny his title to +the sack of prunes which he exhibits in front of his counter. He will +tell you that he has paid for them; but you answer that the prunes were +raised on stolen land, and shipped to him over a railroad whose +franchise was obtained by bribery. Will that convince the grocer? It +will not. Neither will it convince the policeman or the judge, nor will +it convince the voters of the country. Most people have a deeply rooted +conviction that there are rights to property now definitely established +and made valid by law. If you have paid taxes on land for a certain +period, the land "belongs" to you; and I am sure you might agitate from +now to kingdom come without persuading the American people that New +Mexico ought to be returned to Mexico, or the western prairies to the +Indian tribes. + +Such are the facts; now let us apply them to the right of exploitation, +embodied in the ownership of a certain number of bonds or shares of +stock in the United States Steel Corporation. "Pass a law," says the +Socialist, "providing for the taking over of United States Steel by the +government." At once to every owner comes one single thought--are you +going to buy this stock, or are you going to confiscate it? If you +attempt confiscation, the courts will declare the law unconstitutional; +and you either have to defy the courts, which is revolutionary action, +or to amend the constitution. If you adopt the latter course, you have +before you a long period of agitation; you have to carry both houses of +Congress by a two-thirds majority, and the legislatures of three-fourths +of the States. You have to do this in the face of the most bitter and +infuriated opposition of those who are defending what they regard as +their rights. You have to meet the arguments of the entire capitalist +press of the country, and you have the certainty of widespread bribery +of your elected officials. + +The prospect of doing all this under the forms of law seems extremely +discouraging; so come the Syndicalists, saying, "Let us seize the +factories, and stop the exploitation at the point of production." So +come the Communists, saying, "Let us overthrow capitalist government, +and break the net of bourgeois legality, and establish a dictatorship of +the proletariat, which will put an end to privilege and class domination +all at once." What are we to say to these different programs? + +Suppose we buy out the stockholders of United States Steel, and issue +to them government bonds, what have we accomplished? Nothing, say the +advocates of confiscation; we have changed the form of exploitation, but +the substance of it remains the same. The stockholders get their money +from the United States government, instead of from the United States +Steel Corporation; but they get their money just the same--the product, +not of their labor, but of the labor of the steel workers. Suppose we +carried out the same procedure all along the line; suppose the +government took over all industries, and paid for their securities with +government bonds. Then we should have capitalism administered by a +capitalist government, instead of by our present masters of industry; we +should have a state capitalism, instead of a private capitalism; we +should have the government buying and selling products, and exploiting +labor, and paying over the profits to an hereditary privileged class. +The capitalist system would go on just the same, except that labor would +have one all-powerful tyrant, instead of many lesser tyrants, as at +present. + +So argue the advocates of confiscation. And the advocates of purchase +reply that in buying the securities of United States Steel, we should +fix the purchase price at the present market value of the property, and +that price, once fixed, would be permanent; all future unearned +increment of the steel industry would belong to the government instead +of to private owners. Consider, for example, what happened during the +world war. When I was a boy, soon after the Steel Trust was launched, +its stock was down to something like six dollars, and I knew small +investors who lost every dollar they had put in. But during the war, +steel stock soared to a hundred and thirty-six dollars per share; it +paid dividends of some thirty per cent per year, and accumulated +enormous surpluses besides. + +The same thing was true of practically all the big corporations. +According to Secretary of the Treasury McAdoo, there were coal companies +which paid as high as eight hundred per cent per year; that is to say, +the profits in one year were eight times the total investment. Assuming +that our government bonds paid five per cent, it appears that the owners +of these coal companies got one hundred and sixty times as much under +our present private property system as they would have got under a +system of state purchase. Even completely dominated by capitalism as our +courts are today, they would not dare require us to pay for industries +more than six per cent on the market value of the investment; and from +what I know of the inside graft of American big business that would be +restricting the private owners to less than one-fourth of what they are +getting at present. + +We have already pointed out the economies that can be made by putting +industry under a uniform system. But all these, important as they are, +amount to little in comparison with the one great consideration, which +is that by purchasing large scale industry, we should break the "iron +ring"; we should thenceforth be able to do our manufacturing for use +instead of for profit, and so we should put an end to unemployment. Our +cheerful workers would throng into the factories, to produce for +themselves instead of for masters; and in one year of that we should so +change the face of our country that a return to the system of private +ownership would be unthinkable. In one year we could raise production to +such a point that the interest on the bonds we had issued would be like +the crumbs left over from a feast. + + + + +CHAPTER LXVII + +EXPROPRIATING THE EXPROPRIATORS + + (Discusses the dictatorship of the proletariat, and its chances for + success in the United States.) + + +I am aware that the suggestion of paying for the industries we socialize +will sound tame and uninspiring to a lot of ardent young radicals of my +acquaintance. They will shake their heads sadly and say that I am +getting middle-aged and tired. We have seen in Russia and Hungary and +other places, so many illustrations of the quick and easy way to +expropriate the expropriators that now there is in every country a +considerable group of radicals who will hear to no program less +picturesque than barricades and councils of action. + +In considering this question, I set aside all considerations of abstract +right or wrong, the justification for violence in the overthrow of +capitalist society. I put the question on the basis of cash, pure and +simple. It will cost a certain amount of money to buy out the owners, +and that money will have to be paid, as it is paid at present, out of +the labor of the useful workers. The workers don't want to pay any more +than they have to; the question they must consider is, which way will +they have to pay most. The advocates of the dictatorship of the +proletariat are lured by the delightful prospect of not having to pay +anything; and if that were really possible it would undoubtedly be the +better way. But we have to consider this question: Is the program of not +having to pay anything a reality, or is it only a dream? Suppose it +should turn out that we have to pay anyhow, and that in the case of +violent revolution we pay much more, and in addition run serious risk of +not getting what we pay for? + +Here are enormous industries, running at full blast, and it is proposed +that some morning the workers shall rise up and seize them, and turn out +the owners and managers, and run the industries themselves. Will anybody +maintain that this can be done without stopping production in those +factories for a single day? Certainly production must stop during the +time you are fighting for possession; and the cruel experience of +Russia proves that it will stop during the further time you are fighting +to keep possession, and to put down counter-revolutionary conspiracies. +Also, alas, it will stop during the time you are looking for somebody +who knows how to run that industry; it will stop during the time you are +organizing your new administrative staff. You may discover to your +consternation that it stops during the time you are arranging to get +other industries to give you credit, and to ship you raw materials; also +during the time you are finding the workers in other industries who want +your product, and are able to pay for it with something that you can +use, or that you can sell in a badly disorganized market. + +And all the time that you are arranging these things, you are going to +have the workers at your back, not getting any pay, or being paid with +your paper money which they distrust, and growling and grumbling at you +because you are not running things as you promised. You see, the mass of +the workers are not going to understand, because you haven't made them +understand; you have brought about the great change by your program of a +dictatorship, of action by an "enlightened minority"; and now you have +the terror that the unenlightened majority may be won back by their +capitalist masters, and may kick you out of control, or even stand you +up against a wall and shoot you by a firing squad. And all the time you +are worrying over these problems, who can estimate the total amount the +factory might have been producing if it had been running at full blast? +Whatever that difference is, remember, it is paid by the workers; and +might that sum not just as well have been used to buy out the owners? + +If we were back in the old days of hand labor and crude, unorganized +production, I admit that the only way to benefit the slaves might be to +turn out the masters by force. But here we have a social system of +infinite complexity, a delicate and sensitive machine, which no one +person in the world, and no group of persons understands thoroughly. In +the running of such a machine a slight blunder may cost a fortune; and +certainly all the skill, all the training, all the loyal services of our +expert engineers and managers is needed if we are to remodel that +machine while keeping it running. The amount of wealth which we could +save by the achieving of that feat would be sufficient to maintain a +class of owners in idleness and luxury for a generation; and so I say, +with all the energy and conviction I possess, _pay them_! Pay them +anything that is necessary, in order to avoid civil war and social +disorganization! Pay them so much that they can have no possible cause +of complaint, that the most hide-bound capitalistic-minded judge in the +country cannot find a legal flaw in the bargain! Pay them so that every +engineer and efficiency expert and manager and foreman and stenographer +and office-boy will stay on the job and work double time to put the +enterprise through! Pay them such a price that even Judge Gary and John +D. Rockefeller will be willing to help us do the job of social +readjustment! + +"Ah, yes," my young radical friends will say, "that sounds all very +beautiful, but it's the old Utopian dream of brotherhood and class +co-operation. That will never happen on this earth, until you have first +abolished capitalism." My answer is, it could happen tomorrow if we had +sufficient intelligence to make it happen. That it does not happen is +simply absence of intelligence. And will anyone maintain that it is the +part of an intelligent man to advocate a less intelligent course than he +knows? What is the use of our intelligence, if we abdicate its +authority, and give ourselves up to programs of action which we know are +blind and destructive and wasteful? We may see a great vessel going on +the rocks; we may feel certain that it is going, in spite of everything +we can do; but shall we fail to do what we can to make those in the +vessel realize how they might get safely into the harbor? + +We have had the Russian revolution before us for four years. Mankind +will spend the next hundred years in studying it, and still have much to +learn, but the broad outlines of the great experiment are now plain +before our eyes. Russia was a backward country, and she tried to fight a +modern war, and it broke her down. She had practically no middle class, +and her ruling class was rotten, and so the revolutionists had their +chance, and they seized it. Perhaps it would be more correct to say that +they came to the rescue of Russia, saving her from the hands of those +who were trying to force her to fight, when she was utterly exhausted +and incapable of fighting. + +Anyhow, here was your dictatorship of the proletariat. It turned out all +the executive experts, or nearly all of them, because they were tainted +with the capitalist psychology; and then straightway it had to call them +back and make terms with them, because industry could not be run without +them. And of course these engineers and managers sabotaged the +revolution--every non-proletarian sabotaged it, both inside Russia and +outside. You denounced this, and protested against this, but all the +same it happened; it was human nature that it should happen, and it is +one of the things you have to count on, in any and every country where +you attempt the social revolution by minority action. + +They have got power in Russia, and they dream of getting power in +America in the same way. But there is no such disorganization in our +country as there was in Russia, and it would take a generation of civil +strife to bring us to such a condition. We have a middle class, +powerful, thoroughly organized, and thoroughly conscious. Moreover, this +class has ideals of majority rule, which are bred in its very bones; and +while they have never realized these ideals, they think they have, and +they are prepared to fight to the last gasp in that belief. All that the +leaders of Moscow have to do is to bring about an attempt at forcible +revolution, and they will discover in American society sufficient power +of organization and of brutal action to put their movement out of +business for a generation. + +A hundred years ago we had chattel slavery firmly fixed as the +industrial system of one-half of these United States. To far-seeing +statesmen it was manifest that chattel slavery was a wasteful system, +and that it could not exist in competition with free labor. There was a +great American, Henry Clay, who came forward with a proposition that the +people of the United States, through their government, should raise the +money, about a billion dollars, and compensate the owners of all the +slaves and set them free. For most of his lifetime Henry Clay pleaded +for that plan. But the masters of the South were making money fast; they +knew how to handle the negro as a slave, they could not imagine handling +him as a free laborer, and they would not hear to the plan. On the other +side of Mason and Dixon's line were fanatical men of "principle," who +said that slavery was wrong, and that was the end of it. There is a +stanza by Emerson discussing this question of confiscation versus +compensation: + + Pay ransom to the owner + And fill the bag to the brim. + Who is the owner? The slave is owner, + And ever was. Pay him. + +This, you see, is magnificent utterance, but as economic philosophy it +is reckless and unsound. The abolitionists of the North took up this +poem, and the slave power of the South answered with a battle-song: + + War to the hilt, + Theirs be the guilt, + Who fetter the freeman to ransom the slave! + +And so the issue had to be fought out. It cost a million human lives and +five billions of treasure, and it set American civilization back a +generation. And now we confront exactly the same kind of emergency, and +are coming to exactly the same method of solution. We have white +wage-slaves clamoring for their freedom, and we have business men making +money out of them, and exercising power over them, and finding it +convenient and pleasant. They are going to fight it out in a civil war, +and which side is going to win I am not sure. But when the historians +come to write about it a couple of generations from now, let them be +able to record that there were a few men in the country who pleaded for +a sane and orderly and human solution of the problem, and who continued +to voice their convictions even in the midst of the cruel and wasteful +strife! + + + + +CHAPTER LXVIII + +THE PROBLEM OF THE LAND + + (Discusses the land values tax as a means of social readjustment, + and compares it with other programs.) + + +The writer of this book has been watching the social process for twenty +years, trying to figure out one thing--how the change from competition +to co-operation can be brought about with the minimum of human waste. He +has come to realize that the first step is a mental one; to get the +people to want the change. That means that the program must be simple, +so that the masses can understand it. As a social engineer you might +work out a perfect plan, but find yourself helpless, because it was hard +to explain. As illustration of what I mean, I cite the single tax, a +theory which has a considerable hold in America, but which politically +has been utterly ineffective. + +A few years ago a devoted enthusiast in Southern California, Luke North, +started what he called the "Great Adventure" to set free the idle land. +In the campaign of 1918 I gave my help to this movement, and when it +failed I went back and took stock, and revised my conclusions concerning +the single tax. Theoretically the movement has a considerable percentage +of right on its side. Land, in the sense that single taxers use it, +meaning all the natural sources of wealth, is certainly an important +basis of exploitation, and if you were to tax land values to the full +extent, you would abolish a large portion of privilege--just how large +would be hard to figure. I was perfectly willing to begin with that +portion, so I helped with the "Great Adventure." But a practical test +convinced me that it could never persuade a majority of the people. + +The single tax proposal is to abolish all taxes except the tax on land +values. Then come the associations of the bankers and merchants and real +estate speculators, crying in outraged horror, "What? You propose to let +the rich man's stocks and bonds go free? You propose to put no tax on +his cash in the vaults and on his wife's jewels? You propose to abolish +the income tax and the inheritance tax, and put all the costs of +government on the poor man's lot?" + +Now, of course, I know perfectly well that the rich man dodges most of +his income tax and most of his inheritance tax. I know that he pays a +nominal pittance on his cash in the bank and on his wife's jewels, and +likewise on his stocks and bonds. I know that the corporations issuing +these stocks and bonds would be far more heavily hit by a tax on the +natural resources they own; they could not evade this tax, and they know +it, and that is why they are moved to such deep concern for the fate of +the poor man and his lot. I know that the tax on the poor man's lot +would be infinitesimal in comparison with the tax on the great +corporation. But how can I explain all this to the poor man? To +understand it requires a knowledge of the complexities of our economic +system which the voters simply have not got. + +How much easier to take the bankers and speculators at their word! To +answer, "All right, gentlemen, since you like the income and inheritance +taxes, the taxes on stocks and bonds and money and jewels, we will leave +these taxes standing. Likewise, we assent to your proposition that the +poor man should not pay taxes on his lot, while there are rich men and +corporations in our state holding twenty million acres of land out of +use for purposes of speculation. We will therefore arrange a land values +tax on a graduated basis, after the plan of the income tax; we will +allow one or two thousand dollars' worth of land exempt from all +taxation, provided it is used by the owner; and we will put a graduated +tax on all individuals and corporations owning a greater quantity of +land, so that in the case of individuals and corporations owning more +than ten thousand dollars' worth of land, we will take the full rental +value, and thus force all idle land into the market." + +Now, the provision above outlined would have spiked every single +argument used by the opposition to the "Great Adventure" in California +in 1918; it would have made the real intent of the measure so plain as +to win automatically the additional votes needed to carry the election. +But I tried for three years, without being able to persuade a single one +of the "Great Adventure" leaders to recognize this plain fact. The +single taxer has his formula, the land values tax and no other tax, and +all else is heresy. Actually, the president of a big single tax +organization in the East declared that by the advocacy of my idea I had +"betrayed the single tax!" We may take this as an illustration of the +difference between dogmatism and science in the strategy of the class +struggle. + +I first suggested my program immediately after the war, with the +provision that the land thrown on the market should be purchased by the +state, and used to establish co-operative agricultural colonies for the +benefit of returned soldiers. But we have preferred to have our returned +soldiers stay without work, or to displace the men and women who had +been gallantly "doing their bit." By this means we soon had five million +men out of work, and many other millions bitterly discontented with +their wages. Again I took up the proposition for a graduated land tax, +with the suggestion that the money should be used to provide a pension, +first for every dependent man or woman over sixty years of age in the +country, and second for every child in the country whose parents were +unable properly to support it, whether because they were dead or sick or +unemployed. + +You may note that in advocating this program, you would not have to +convert anybody to any foreign theories, nor would you have to use any +long words; you would not have to say anything against the constitution, +nor to break any law, nor to give occasion for patriotic mobs to tar and +feather you. To every poor man in your state you could say, "If you own +your own house and lot, this bill will lift the taxes from both, and +therefore it will mean fifty or a hundred dollars a year in your pocket. +If you do not own a home, it will take millions of idle acres out of the +hands of the speculators, and break the price of real estate, so that +you can have either a lot in the city or a farm in the country with +ease." + +Furthermore, you could say, "This measure will have the effect of +drawing the unemployed from the cities at once, and so stopping the +downward course of wages. At the same time that wages hold firm, the +cost of food will go down, because there will be millions more men +working on the land. In addition to that, the state will have an +enormous income, many millions of dollars a year, taken exclusively from +those who are owning and not producing. This money will be expended in +saving from suffering and humiliation the old people of the country, who +have worked hard all their lives and have been thrown on the scrap-heap; +also in making certain that every child in the country has food enough +and care enough to make him into a normal and healthy human being, so +that he can do his share of work in the world and pay his own way +through life." + +I submit the above measure to those who believe that the road to social +freedom lies by some sort of land tax. But before you take it up I +invite you to consider whether there may not be some other way, even +easier. There is a homely old saying to the effect that "molasses +catches more flies than vinegar"; and I am always looking for some way +that will get the poor what they want, without frightening the rich any +more than necessary. + +I know a certain type of radical whom this question always exasperates. +He answers that the opposition will be equally strong to any plan; the +rich will do anything for the poor except get off their backs--and so +on. In reply I mention that among the most ardent radicals I know are +half a dozen millionaires; I know one woman who is worth a million, who +pleads day and night for social revolution, while the people who work +for her are devoted and respectful wage slaves. Herbert Spencer said +that his idea of a tragedy was a generalization killed by a fact. I +shall not say that the existence of millionaire Socialists and parlor +Bolsheviks kills the theory of the class struggle, but I certainly say +it compels us to take thought of the rich as well as of the poor in +planning the strategy of our campaign. + +And manifestly, if we want to consider the rich, the very last device we +shall use is that of a tax. Nobody likes to pay taxes; everybody agrees +in classifying taxes with death. Each feels that he is paying more than +his share already; each knows that the government which collects the tax +is incompetent or worse. Stop and recall what we have proven about the +"iron ring"; the possibilities of production latent in our society. +Realize the bearings of this all-important fact, that we can offer to +mankind a social revolution which will make everybody richer, instead of +making some people poorer! Exactly how to do this is the next thing we +have to inquire. + + + + +CHAPTER LXIX + +THE CONTROL OF CREDIT + + (Deals with money, the part it plays in the restriction of + industry, and may play in the freeing of industry.) + + +How is it that the rich are becoming richer? The single taxer answers +that it is by monopoly of the land, the natural sources of wealth; the +Socialist answers that it is by the control of the machinery of +production. But if you go among the rich and make inquiry, you speedily +learn that these factors, large as they are, amount to little in +comparison with another factor, the control of credit. There are hosts +of little capitalists and business men who deal in land and produce +goods with machinery, but the men who make the real fortunes and +dominate the modern world are those who control credit, and whose +business is, not the production of anything, but speculation and the +manipulation of markets. + +"Money makes the mare go," our ancestors used to say; and money today +determines the destiny of empires. What is money? We think of it as gold +and silver coins, and pieces of engraved paper promising to pay gold and +silver coins. But the report of the U. S. Comptroller of the Currency +for 1919 shows that the business of the country was done, 5% by such +means and 95 % by checks; so, for practical purposes, we may say that +money consists of men's willingness to trust other men, or groups or +organizations of men, when they make written promise to pay. In other +words, money is credit; and the control of credit means the control of +industry. The problem of social readjustment is mainly but the problem +of taking the control of credit out of the hands of private individuals, +and making it a public or social function. + +Who controls credit today? The bankers. And how do they control it? We +give it to them; we, the masses of the people, who take them our money +and leave it with them. A very little real money in hand becomes, under +our banking system, the basis of a great amount of imaginary money. The +Federal Reserve law requires that banks shall hold in reserve from +seven to thirteen per cent of demand deposits; which means, in +substance, that when you leave a dollar with a banker, the banker is +allowed, under the law, to turn that dollar into anywhere from seven to +thirteen dollars, and lend those dollars out. In addition, he deposits +his reserves with the Federal Reserve bank, and that bank keeps only +thirty-five per cent in reserve--in other words, the seven to thirteen +imaginary dollars are multiplied again by three. + +Under the stress of war, this process of credit inflation has been +growing like the genii let out of the bottle. Under the law, the Federal +Reserve banks are supposed to hold a gold reserve of 40% to secure our +currency. But in December, 1919, these banks held a trifle over a +billion dollars' worth of gold, while our paper money was over four +billion. In addition, our banks have over thirty-three billions of +deposits, and all these are supposed to be secured by gold; in addition, +there are twenty-five billions of government bonds, and uncounted +billions of private notes, bonds and accounts, all supposed to be +payable in gold. So it appears that about one per cent of our +outstanding money is real, and the rest is imaginary--that is, it is +credit. + +The point for you to get clear is this: The great mass of this imaginary +money is created by law, and we have the power to abolish it or to +change the ownership of it at any time we develop the necessary +intelligence. Let us consider the ordinary paper money, the one and two +and five and ten dollar "bills," with which we plain people do most of +our business. These are Federal Reserve notes, and there are about three +billions of them; how do they come to be? Why, we grant to the national +banks by law the right to make this money; the government prints it for +them, and they put it into circulation. And what does it cost them? They +pay one per cent for the use of the money; in some cases they pay only +one-half of one per cent; and then they lend it to us, the people--and +what do they charge us? The answer is available in a recent report of +the U. S. Comptroller of the Currency, as follows: + +"I have the record of the loans made by one Texas national bank to a +hard-working woman who owned a little farm a few miles from town. She +borrowed, in the aggregate, $2,375, making about thirty loans during the +year. Listen to the details of the robbery: $162.50 for 30 days at 36 +per cent; $377. for 34 days at 44 per cent; $620.25 for 23 days at 77 +per cent; $11. for 30 days at 120 per cent; $21.50 for 30 days at 90 +per cent; $33. for 2 days at 93 per cent; $27. for 15 days at 195 per +cent; $110. for 30 days at 120 per cent--that was to buy a horse for her +plowing; $20 for 48 days at 187 per cent; $6 for 10 days at 720 per +cent; $7 for 3 days at 2,000 per cent, and so on; every cent paid off by +what sweat and struggle only God knows." + +In Oklahoma, where the legal rate of interest is six per cent, with ten +per cent as the maximum under special contract, harassed farmers paid +all the way from 12 to 2400 per cent, with 40 per cent as the average. +In the case of one bank, the Comptroller proved that not a single +solitary loan had been made under fifteen per cent. He cited one +particular case that he asked to be regarded as typical. In the spring +the farmer went to the bank and arranged for a loan of $200. Out of his +necessity he was compelled to pay 55 per cent interest charge. Unable to +meet the note at maturity, he had to agree to 100 per cent interest in +order to get the renewal. The next renewal forced him up to 125 per +cent. For four years the thing went on, and all the drudgery of the +father and the mother and the six children could never keep down the +terrible interest or wipe out the principal. As a finish the bank +swooped down and sold him out; the wretched man, barefoot and hungry, +went to work clearing a swamp, caught pneumonia and died; the county +buried him, and neighbors raised a purse to send the widow and children +back to friends in Arkansas. + +This is the thing called the Money Trust in action, and this is the +power we have to take out of private control. It is our first job, and +all other jobs are in comparison hardly worth mentioning. How are we +going to do it? + +The farmers of North Dakota have shown one way. They took the control of +their state government into their own hands, and the most important and +significant thing they did was to start a public bank. The interests +fought them tooth and nail; not merely the interests of North Dakota, +not merely of the Northwest, but of the entire United States. They +fought them in the law courts, up to the United States Supreme Court, +which decided in favor of the people of North Dakota. Therefore, make +note of this vital fact--the most important single fact in the strategy +of the class struggle--every state can, under the constitution, have a +public bank; every city and town can have one, and no court can ever +forbid it! + +Therefore, I say to all Socialists, labor men and social reformers of +every shade and variety, nail at the top of your program of action the +demand for a public bank in your community, to take the control of +credit out of the hands of speculators and use it for the welfare of the +people. Make it your first provision that every dollar of public money +shall be deposited in this bank and every detail of public financing +handled by this bank; make it your second provision that the purpose of +this bank shall be to put all private banks out of business, and take +over their power for the people. + +At present, you understand, it is taken for granted that the first +purpose of the government is to foster the private credit system. Take, +for example, the postal savings bank. The private banks fought this for +a generation, and finally they allowed us to have it, on condition that +it should be turned into a device for collecting money for them. Our +postal bank turns over all its money to the private banks, at the +grotesque rate of two per cent interest; and recently I read of the +director of the postal bank appearing before a convention of bankers, +asking for some small favor, and humbly explaining that it was not his +idea to make the postal bank a rival of the private savings banks. Why +should he not do so? Let us nail it to our radical program that the +postal savings bank is to fight for business, just as do the private +banks, and lend its funds direct to the people on good security. + +Let our Federal banking system also become the servant of the public +welfare, and let its energy be devoted to breaking the strangle-hold of +predatory finance on our industry. Let the government issue all money, +and use it for the transfer of industry from private into public hands. +Do we want to socialize our railroads, our coal mines, our telegraphs +and telephones? Do we want to buy them, in order to avoid the wastes of +civil war and insurrection? We have agreed that we do; and here we have +the way of doing it. If the bankers can create, out of our willingness +to trust them, billions upon billions of imaginary money, then so can +we, the people of the United States, create money out of our willingness +to trust ourselves. And do not let anybody fool you for a single second +by talking about "fiat money" and "inflation of the currency." If you +are paying twice as much for everything as you did before the war, you +are paying it because the bankers have doubled the amount of money in +circulation--for that reason and that alone. That double money the +bankers own; the only question now to be decided is, who is to own the +double money that will be created tomorrow? + +Make note of the fact that it costs nothing to start a public bank. If +you want to put the steel trust out of business by competition, you have +several hundred thousand dollars worth of rolling mills and ore land to +buy; but the banks can be put out of business by nothing but a law. The +material parts of a bank, the white marble columns and bronze railings +and mahogany trimmings, are as nothing compared with the inner soul of a +bank, its control of the life-blood of your business and mine; and this +we can have for the taking. We can keep our own "credit"; instead of +sending it to Wall Street, where speculators use it to bleed us white, +we can set it to building up our own community, under the direction of +officials whom we select. Also, we can have our gigantic national bank, +controlling all our thirty-three billions of dollars of deposits, and +likewise the hundreds of billions of credit built upon them. + +The first time you suggest this plan to a banker or business man, you +will be told that increase of money by the government does not benefit +labor or the general consumer; "inflation of the currency" causes prices +to go up correspondingly. To this I will furnish an effective reply: +that at the same time the government issues new money, the government +will also fix prices; and then watch the face of your banker or business +man! If he is a man who can really think, and is not just repeating like +a parrot the formulas he has learned from others, he will perceive that +the combination of currency inflation and price-fixing would catch him +as the two parts of a nut-cracker catch a nut; and he will know that you +can take the meat out of him any time you please. He may argue that it +is not fair; but point out to him that it is exactly what the big banks +and the trusts have been doing to us right along--increasing the amount +of money in circulation, and at the same time raising the prices we pay +for goods, and so taking out the meat from us nuts! + +We have agreed that we do not mean to be unfair either to the banker or +the manufacturer; we are simply going to stop their being unfair to us. +We are going to convince them that their power to catch us in a +nut-cracker is forever at an end. We allow them six per cent on their +investments, and guarantee them this by turning over to them some of our +new money--that is, government bonds. When we have thoroughly convinced +them that they can't get any more, they will take these bonds and quit; +and thus simply, without violence or destruction of property, we shall +slide from our present system of commercial cannibalism into the new +co-operative commonwealth. + +We have had "cheap money" campaigns in the United States many times, and +as this book is written, it becomes evident that we are to have another. +Henry Ford is advocating the idea, and so is Thomas A. Edison. The +present writer would like to make plain that in supporting such a +program, he does it for one purpose, and one only--the taking over of +the industries by the community. The creation of state credit for that +purpose is the next step in the progress of human society; whereas the +creation of state credit for the continuance of the profit system is a +piece of futility amounting to imbecility. This distinction is +fundamental, and is the test by which to judge the usefulness of any new +program, and the intelligence of those who advocate it. + + + + +CHAPTER LXX + +THE CONTROL OF INDUSTRY + + (Discusses various programs for the change from industrial + autocracy to industrial democracy.) + + +The program of the railway workers for the democratic management of +their industry is embodied in the Plumb plan. You may learn about it by +addressing the weekly paper of the railway brotherhoods, which is called +"Labor," and is published in Washington, D. C. It appears that our +transportation industry can be at once socialized, because of a clause +in the constitution which gives the national government power over +"roads and communications." Through decades of mismanagement under the +system of private greed, the railroads have been brought to such a +financial condition that they will be forced into nationalization, +whenever we stop them from dipping their fingers into the public +treasury. + +Under the Plumb plan the government is to purchase the roads from their +present owners, paying with government bonds. The management is to be +under the control of a board consisting in part of representatives of +the government, and in part of the workers--this being a combination of +the methods of Socialism and Syndicalism. The same program can be +applied constitutionally to telegraphs and telephones, to interstate +trolley systems, express companies, oil pipe lines, and all other means +of interstate communication and distribution. + +The Plumb plan also deals with coal and steel and other great +industries. These could not be nationalized without a constitutional +amendment, but it appears that in the majority of the constitutions of +the states are provisions that all corporate charters are held subject +to the power of the legislature to amend, modify, or revoke the same. +That gives us a right to take over these corporations through state +action. The only preliminary is to elect state administrations which +will represent us, instead of representing the corporations. Also, most +state constitutions contain the provision that "no corporation shall +issue its stocks or bonds, except for money, labor, or property actually +received." The word "labor" gives the opening wedge for the Plumb plan. +The state can purchase these industries, giving bonds in exchange, and +can issue to the workers labor stock, which stock will carry part +control of the industry. + +Also, the railroad brotherhoods have started their own bank, in +Cleveland, Ohio, and it is proving an enormous success. Make note of +this point; every large labor union can have its own bank, to finance +its industries and its propaganda. Stop and consider how preposterous it +is that the five million organized workers of the United States should +deposit their hundreds of millions of savings in capitalist banks, to be +used to finance private undertakings which crush unions and hold labor +in bondage. Let every big labor union have its own building, its own +banking and insurance business, its own vacation camp in the country, +its own school for training its future leaders. Also, let every labor +council in every big city start a labor daily, to tell the workers the +truth and point the way to freedom. Let every farmers' organization +follow suit; and let these groups get together, to exchange their +products upon a co-operative basis. Already the railway men are +arranging with the farmers, to buy the farm products and distribute them +co-operatively; they are getting together with the clothing workers, to +have the latter make clothing for them, and with the shoe-workers to +make shoes. + +This is the co-operative movement, which has become the largest single +industry in Great Britain, and is the backbone of industrial democracy +and sound radicalism. It is spreading rapidly in America now. It is +taking the money of the people out of the control of the profit system, +and diverting it into channels of public service. It is training men to +believe in brotherhood instead of in greed. It is giving them business +experience, so that when the time comes the taking over of our +industrial machine will not have to be done by amateurs, but by men who +know what co-operation is, and how to make a success of it. + +This work will go on more rapidly yet when the workers have united +politically, and brought into power a government which will assist them +instead of assisting the bankers. A most interesting program for the +development of working-class financial credit is known as the "Douglas +plan," which is advocated by a London weekly, the "New Age," and is +explained in two books, called "Economic Democracy" and "Credit Power +and Democracy," by Douglas and Orage. This program is in brief that the +furnishing of credit shall become a function of organized labor, based +upon the fact that the true and ultimate basis of all credit is the +power of hand and brain labor to produce wealth. The labor unions, or +"guilds," shall pay the management of industry and pay capital for the +use of the industrial plant, and shall finance production and new +industrial development out of their "credit power," their ability to +promise production and to keep their promises. + +This "Douglas plan" seeks to break the Money Trust by the method of +Syndicalism. Another method of breaking it, through state regulation of +bank loans, you will find most completely set forth in an extremely able +book, "The Strangle Hold," by H. C. Cutting, an American business man, +whom you may address at San Lorenzo, California. Another method, +utilizing the third factor in industry, the consumer, is the method of +banking by consumers' unions. Such are the Raffeisen banks, widely known +in Germany, and a specimen of which exists in the single tax colony at +Arden, Delaware. Those who wish to know about the co-operative bank, or +other forms of co-operation, may apply to the Co-operative League of +America, 2 West 13th Street, New York, whose president is Dr. James P. +Warbasse. Information concerning public ownership may be had from the +Public Ownership League, 127 N. Dearborn Street, Chicago; also from the +Socialist party, 220 South Ashland Boulevard, Chicago, and from the +Bureau of Social Research of the Rand School of Social Science, New +York. + +Also, I ought to mention the very interesting plan for social +reconstruction set forth by Mr. King C. Gillette, inventor of the safety +razor. This plan you may find in your public library in two encyclopedic +volumes, "Gillette's Social Redemption," and "Gillette's World +Solution." The politician seeks to solve the industrial problem by means +of the state, and the labor leader seeks to solve it by the unions; it +is to be expected that Mr. Gillette, a capitalist, should seek to solve +it by means of the corporation. He points out that the modern "trust" is +the greatest instrument of production yet invented by man; and he asks +why the people should not form their own "trust," to handle their own +affairs, and to purchase and take over the industries from their present +private masters. It is interesting to note that Mr. Gillette's solution +is fully as radical and thorough-going as those of the State Socialists +or the Syndicalists. The "People's Corporation" which he projects and +plans some day to launch upon the world would be a gigantic "consumers' +union," whose "credit power" would speedily dominate and absorb all +other powers in modern society; it would make us all stockholders, and +give us our share of the benefits of social productivity. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXI + +THE NEW WORLD + + (Describes the co-operative commonwealth, beginning with its money + aspects; the standard wage and its variations.) + + +It has been indicated that the new society will be different in +different countries and in different parts of the same country, in +different industries and at different times. No one can predict exactly +what it will be, and anyone who tries to predict is unscientific. But +every man can work out his own ideas of the most economical and sensible +arrangements for a co-operative society, and in these final chapters I +set forth my ideas. + +One of the first things people ask is, "Will there be money in the new +society, or how will labor be rewarded and goods paid for?" I answer +that there will be money, and the business methods of the new society +will be so nearly the same as at present that in this respect you would +hardly realize there had been any change. The only difference will be +that in the new society you will be paid several times as much for your +labor; or, if you prefer to put it the other way, you will be able to +buy several times as much with your money. Why should we waste our time +working out systems of "credit-cards," when we already have a system in +the form of gold and silver coins and paper currency? Why should we +bother with "labor checks," when we have a banking and clearing-house +system, understood by everyone but the illiterate? The only difference +we shall make is that nobody can get gold and silver coins or paper +currency, except by performing labor to pay for them; nobody can have +money in the bank and draw checks against it, until he has rendered to +society an equivalent amount of service. + +When you have earned your money in the new world, you will spend it +wherever you please, and for whatever you please; the only difference +being that the price you pay will be the exact labor-cost of producing +that article, with no deduction for any form of exploitation. As I wrote +sixteen years ago in "The Industrial Republic," you will be able to get, +if you insist upon it, a seven-legged spider made of diamonds, and the +only question society will ask is, Have you performed services +equivalent to the material and labor necessary to the creating of that +unusual article of commerce? Of course, society won't put it to you in +that complicated formula; it will simply ask, "Have you got the price?" +Which, you observe, is exactly the question society asks you at present. + +The next thing that everybody wants to know is, "Shall we all be paid +the same wages?" I answer, yes and no, because there will be three +systems of payment. There will be a basic wage, which everybody will get +for every kind of useful service necessary to production; this will be, +as it were, the foundation of our economic structure. On top of this +will be built a system of special payments for special services, which +are of an intellectual nature, and cannot be standardized and dealt with +wholesale. In addition, there will be for a time a third arrangement, +applying to agricultural work, which is in a different stage of +development, and to which different conditions apply. + +Let us take, first, our standard wage. The census of our Utopian +commonwealth reveals that we have ten million able-bodied workers +engaged in mining, manufacturing, and transportation; this including, of +course, office-work and management--everything that enters into these +industries. By scientific management, the best machinery, and the +elimination of all possible waste, we find that they produce eighty +million dollars worth of goods an hour. A portion of this we have to set +aside to pay for the raw materials which they do not produce, and for +the upkeep of the plant, and for margin of error--what our great +corporations call a surplus. We find that we have fifty million dollars +per hour left, and that means that we can pay for labor five dollars per +hour, or twenty dollars for the regular four-hour day. This is our +standard wage, received by all able-bodied workers. + +But quickly we find that our industries are not properly balanced. A +great many men want to work at the jobs which are clean and pleasant, +such as delivering mail, and very few want to work at washing dishes in +restaurants and cleaning the sewers. There is no way we can adjust this, +except by paying a higher wage, or by reducing the number of hours in +the working day, which is the same thing. The only other method would be +to have the state assign men to their work, and that would be +bureaucracy and slavery, the essence of everything we wish to get away +from in our co-operative commonwealth. + +What we shall have, so far as concerns our basic industries, is a +government department, registering with mathematical accuracy the +condition of supply and demand in all the industries of the country. Our +demand for shoes is increasing, for some reason or other; a thousand +more shoe-workers are needed, therefore the price of labor in the shoe +industry is increased five cents per day--or whatever amount will draw +that number of workers from other occupations. On the other hand, there +are too many people applying for the job of driving trucks, therefore we +reduce slightly the compensation for this work. There are more men who +want jobs in Southern California than in Alaska, therefore the payment +for the same grade of work in Alaska has to be higher. All this is not +merely speculation, it is not a matter of anybody's choice; it is an +automatic, self-adjusting system, subject to precise calculations. The +only change from our present system is from guesswork to exact +measurement. At present we do not know how many shoes our country will +require next season, neither do we know how many shoes are going to be +made, neither do we know how many people can make shoes, nor how many +would like to learn, nor how many would like to quit that job and take +to farming. It would be the simplest matter in the world to find out +these things--far simpler that it was to register all our possible +soldiers, and examine them physically and mentally, and train them and +feed them and ship them overseas to "can the Kaiser." + +Of course, we drafted the men for this war job; but in the new world +nobody is drafted for anything. It is any man's privilege to starve if +he feels like it; it is his privilege to go out into the mountains and +live on nuts and berries if he can find them. Nobody makes him go +anywhere, or makes him work at anything--unless, of course, he is a +convicted criminal. To the free citizen all that society has to say is, +if he buys any products, he must pay for those products with his own +labor, and not with some other man's labor. Of course, he may steal, or +cheat, as under capitalism; our new world has laws against stealing and +cheating, and does its best to enforce them. The difference between the +capitalist world and our world is merely that we make it impossible for +any man to get money _legally_ without working. + +Under these conditions the average man wishes to work, and the only +question remaining is, how shall he work? If he wants to work by +himself, and in his own way, nobody objects to it. He is able to buy +anything he pleases, whether raw materials or finished products. If he +wants to buy leather and make shoes after his own pattern, no one stops +him, and if he can find anyone to buy these shoes, he can earn his +living in that way. He is able to get land for as long a time as he +wants it, by paying to the state the full rental value of that land, and +if he wants to farm the land, he can do so, and sell his products. As a +matter of theory, he is perfectly free to hire others to farm the land +for him, or with him. There is no law to prevent it, neither is there +any law to prevent his renting a factory and buying machinery, and +hiring labor to make shoes. + +But, as a matter of practical fact, it is impossible for him to do this, +because the community is in the business of making shoes, and on an +enormous scale, with great factories run democratically by the workers, +and there is very small chance of any private business man being able to +draw the workers away from these factories. The community factories have +all the latest machinery; they apply the latest methods of scientific +management, and they turn out standard shoes at such a rate that private +competition is unthinkable. Of course, there may be some special kind of +shoes, involving an intellectual element, in which there can be private +competition. This kind of manufacture is covered in our second method of +payment; but before we discuss it, let us settle the problem of our most +important basic industry, which is agriculture. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXII + +AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION + + (Discusses the land in the new world, and how we foster + co-operative farming and co-operative homes.) + + +Farming the land is a very ancient industry, and while its tools have +been improved, its social forms have been the same for a long time. The +worker on the land is conservative, and the Russian Bolsheviks, who +tried to rush their peasants into Communism, found that they had only +succeeded in stopping the production of food. We make no such blunder in +our new society. We have found a way to abolish speculation in land, and +exploitation based on land-ownership, while leaving the farmer free to +run his business in the old way if he wants to. + +In our new society we take the full rental value of all land which is +not occupied and used by the state. The farmer and the city dweller +alike "own" their land, in the sense that they have the use of it for as +long as they please, but they pay to the state the rental value of the +land, minus the improvements. So they cannot speculate in the land or +rent it out to others; they can only use it, and they only pay for what +they actually use. They may put improvements on the land, with full +assurance of having the use and benefit thereof, and they may sell the +improvements, and the new owner enters into possession, with no +obligation but to pay the rental value of the unimproved land to the +state. + +The farmer goes on raising his products, and if he wants to drive to +town and deliver them to his customers, he may do so; but he finds it +cheaper to market them through the great labor co-operatives and state +markets. As there is no longer any private interest involved in these +activities, no one has any interest in cheating him, and he gets the +full value of the products, less the cost of marketing. If the farmer +wishes to continue all his life in his old style individualistic method +of working the land, he is free to do so. But here is what he sees going +on within a few miles of his place: + +The state has bought a square mile of land, and has taken down the +fences and established an agricultural co-operative for purposes of +experiment and demonstration. The farm is run under the direction of +experts; the soils are treated with exactly the right fertilizers for +each crop, the best paying crops are raised, the best seed is used, and +the best machinery. The workers of this new agricultural co-operative +receive the standard wage, and they live in homes specially built for +them, with all the conveniences made possible by wholesale production. +Also, these co-operators live in a democratic community; they determine +their own conditions of labor, being represented on the governing board, +along with the experts appointed by the state. + +The farmer watches this experiment, at first with suspicion; but he +finds that his sons have less suspicion than he has, and his sons keep +pointing out to him that their little farm is not making the standard +wage or anything like it; and, moreover, the standard wage is constantly +increasing, whereas, the price of farm-products is dropping. And here is +the state, ready to direct new co-operative ventures, inviting a score +of farmers in the community to combine and buy out the unwilling ones, +and establish a new co-operative. Sooner or later the old farmer gives +way; or he dies, and his sons belong to the new world. + +So ultimately we have our national agricultural system, in which all the +requirements of our people are studied, and all the possibilities of our +soil and climate, and the job of raising the exact quantities of food +that we need, both for our own use and for export, is worked out as one +problem. We know how much lumber we need, and we raise it on all our +hillsides and mountain slopes, and so protect ourselves from floods and +the denuding of our continent. We know where best to raise our wheat, +and where best to raise our potatoes and our cabbages, and we do not do +this by crude hand-labor, nor by the labor of women and children from +daybreak till dark. We have special machines that plant each crop, and +other machines that reap it or dig it out of the ground and prepare it +for market. + +A few days ago I read a discussion in the Chamber of Commerce of +Calcutta. Some one called attention to the wastes involved in the +current method of handling rubber. One consignment of rubber had been +sold more than three hundred separate times, and the cost of these +transactions amounted to three times the value of the rubber. This is +only one illustration, and I might quote a thousand. If you doubt my +figures as to the possibility of production in the new society, remind +yourself that a large percentage of the things you use have been bought +and sold many scores of times before you get them. Consider the cabbage, +for which you pay six or eight cents a pound in the grocery store, and +for which the farmer gets, say, half a cent a pound. + +In this new world the state has an enormous income, derived from its tax +on land values. It no longer has to send around men once a year to ask +you how many diamond rings your wife has, and to tax you on your +honesty, if you have any. It no longer has to make its money by such +lying devices as a tariff, therefore its moral being is no longer +poisoned by a tariff-lobby. It taxes every citizen for the right to use +that which nature created, and leaves free from taxation that which the +citizens' own labor created; this kind of taxation is honest, and fair +to all, because no one can evade it. The state uses the proceeds of this +land tax in the public services, the libraries and research laboratories +and information bureaus; in free insurance against fire and flood and +tempest; and in a pension to every member of society above the working +age of fifty-five, or below the working age of eighteen. Of course, the +state might leave it to every man to save up for his old age, but not +all men are this wise, and the state cannot afford to let the unwise +ones starve. It is more convenient for the state to figure that all men, +or nearly all, are going to be old, and to hold back some of their money +while they are young and strong, in the certainty that when they are +old, they will appreciate this service. Also the state takes care of the +sick and incapacitated, and the mentally or physically defective. But we +do not leave these latter loose in the world to reproduce their defects; +we have in our new world some sense of responsibility to the future, and +there is nothing to which we devote more effort than making certain that +nothing unsound or abnormal is allowed entrance into life. + +The problem of the care of children is a complicated one, and our new +society is in process of solving it. We look back on the old world in +which the having of children was heavily taxed, in the form of an +obligation to care for these children until they were old enough to +work. Then the parents were allowed to exploit the labor of the +children, so that among the very poor the raising of children was a +business speculation, like the raising of slaves or poultry. But in our +new world we consider the interest of the child, and of the society in +which that child is to be a citizen. We decide that this society must +have citizens, and that the raising of the future citizens is a work +just exactly as necessary and useful as the raising of a crop of +cabbages. Therefore, we pay a pension to all mothers while they are +raising and caring for children. At the same time we assert the right to +see that this money is wisely spent, and that the child is really cared +for. If it is neglected, we are quick to take it away from its parents, +and put it in one of our twenty-four-hour-a-day schools. + +We realize that the home is an ancient industry, even more ancient than +agriculture, and we do not try to socialize it all at once. But just as +we demonstrate to farmers that the individual farm does not pay, so we +demonstrate to mothers the wastefulness of the single laundry, the +single kitchen, the single nursery. We establish community laundries, +community kitchens, community nurseries, and invite our women to help in +these activities, and to learn there, under expert guidance, the +advantages of domestic co-operation. We convince them by showing better +results in the health and happiness of the children, and in the time and +strength of the mothers. So, little by little, we widen the field of +co-operative endeavor, and increase the total product of human labor and +the total enjoyment of human life. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXIII + +INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTION + + (Discusses scientific, artistic and religious activities, as a + superstructure built upon the foundation of the standard wage.) + + +Karl Kautsky, intellectual leader of the German Social-democracy, gives +in his book, "The Social Revolution," a useful formula as to the +organization of the future society. This formula is: "Communism in +material production, Anarchism in intellectual production." It will +repay us to study this statement, and see exactly what it means. + +Material production depends directly upon things; and as there is only a +limited quantity of things in the world, if any one person has more than +his share, he deprives some other person to that extent. So there have +to be strict laws concerning the distribution of material products. But +with intellectual things exactly the opposite is the case. There is no +limit in quantity, and any one person can have all he wants without +interfering with anybody else. Everybody in the world can perform a play +by Shakespeare, or play a sonata by Beethoven, and everybody can enjoy +it as much as he pleases without keeping other people from enjoying it +all they please. Also, material production can be standardized; we can +have great factories to turn out millions of boxes of matches, each +match like every other match, and the more alike they are the better. +But in intellectual affairs we want everyone to be different, or at +least we want everyone to be free to be different, and if some one can +become much better than the others, this is the most important kind of +production in the world, for he may make over our whole intellectual and +moral life. + +For the production of material things our new society has great +factories owned in common, and run by majority vote of the workers, and +we place the products of that factory at the disposal of all members of +society upon equal terms. That is our "Communism in material +production." On the other hand, in our intellectual production we leave +everybody free to live his own life, and to associate himself with +others of like aims, and we place as few restrictions as possible upon +their activities. This is the method of free association, or "Anarchism +in intellectual production." + +Our problem would be simple if material and intellectual production +never had to mingle. But, as it happens, every kind of intellectual +production requires a certain amount of material, and every kind of +material production involves an intellectual element. Therefore, our two +methods have to be combined, and we have a complex problem which we have +to solve in a variety of different ways, and upon which we must +experiment with open minds and scientific temper. + +First, let us take the intellectual elements involved in the production +of purely material things, such as matches and shoes and soap. Let us +take invention. Naturally, we do not want to go on making matches and +shoes and soap in the same old way forever. On the contrary, we want to +stimulate all the workers in these industries to use their wits and +improve the processes in every possible way. The whole of society has an +interest in this, and the soap workers have an especial interest. Our +soap industry has an invention department, with a group of experts +appointed by the executive committee of the national council of soap +workers. All soap workers are taxed, say five cents a day, for the +support of this activity. Likewise the state contributes a generous sum +out of its income toward the work of soap research. In addition to this, +the soap industry offers prizes and scholarships for suggestions as to +the improvement of every detail of the work, and at meetings of every +local of soap workers somebody makes new suggestions as to methods of +stimulating their intellectual life--not merely as regards soap, but as +regards citizenship, and art and literature, and human life in general. +Our soap workers, you must understand, are no longer wage-slaves, +brutalized by toil and poverty; they are free citizens of a free +society. Our soap workers' local in every city has its own theatre and +concert hall and lecture bureau, and publishes its own magazine. + +Every industry has its immediate intellectual problems, its trade +journals in which these are discussed, and its research boards in which +they are worked out. The ambitions of the young workers in that industry +are concentrated upon getting into this intellectual part of their +trade. Examinations are held and tests are made to discover the most +competent men, and written suggestions are considered by boards of +control. It is, of course, of great importance to every worker that the +channels of promotion should be kept open, and that the man who really +has inventive talent shall get, not merely distinction and promotion, +but financial reward, so that he may have time and materials to continue +his experiments. + +This research department, you perceive, is a sort of superstructure, +built upon the foundation of our standard wage; and this same simile +applies to numerous other forms of intellectual production. For example, +our community paper mills turn out paper, and our community printers are +prepared to turn out millions of books. How shall we determine what is +to be the intellectual content of these material books? There are many +different methods. First, there is the method of individualism. A man +has something to say, and he writes a book; he works in the soap +factory, and saves a part of his standard wage, and when he has money +enough he orders the community printers to print his book, and the +community booksellers to handle it for him, and the community postoffice +to deliver it for him. Again, a group of men organize themselves into an +association, or club, or scientific society, and publish books. The +Authors' League takes up the work of publishing the writings of its +members, and the Poetry Society does the same. + +This is the method of Anarchism, or free association. But there is no +reason why we should not have along side it the method of Socialism; +there is no reason why we should not have state publishing houses, just +as we have state universities and state libraries. The state should +certainly publish standard works of all sorts, bibles and dictionaries +and directories, and cheap editions of the classics. In this new world +our school boards are not chosen by business men for purposes of graft, +they are chosen by the people to educate our children; so it seems to us +perfectly natural that the National Educational Association should +conduct a publication department, and order the printing of the school +books which the children use. + +In the same way, anyone is free to write a play, or to put on a play, +and invite people to come and see it. But, like the individual farmers +and the individual mothers of families, the play-producer in our society +is in competition with great community enterprises, which set a high +standard and make competition difficult. The same thing applies to the +opera, and to concerts, and to all the arts and sciences. You can start +a private hospital if you wish, but you will be in competition with +public institutions, and you can only succeed if you are a man of +genius--that is, if you have something to teach, too new and startling +for the public boards of control to recognize. You try your new method, +and it works, and that becomes a criticism of the public boards of +control, and before long the people by their votes turn out the old +board of control and put you in. + +That is politics, you say; but we in our new world do not use the word +politics as one of contempt. We really believe that public sentiment is +in the long run the best authority, and the appeal to public sentiment +is at once a social privilege and a social service. What we strive to do +is to clear the channels of appeal, and avoid favoritism and stagnation. +To that end we maintain, in every art and every science and every +department of human thought, endless numbers of centers of free, +independent, co-operative activity, so that every man who has an +inspiration, or a new idea, can find some group to support him or can +form a new group of his own. + +This is our "Anarchism in intellectual production," and it is the method +under which in capitalist society men organize all their clubs and +societies and churches. Devout members of the Roman Catholic Church will +be startled to be told that theirs is an Anarchist organization; but +nevertheless, such is the case. The Catholic Church owns a great deal of +property, and speculates in real estate, and to that extent it is a +capitalist institution. It holds a great many people by fear, and to +that extent it is a feudal institution. But in so far as members of the +church believe in it and love it and contribute of their free will to +its support, they are organizing by the method which all Anarchists +recommend and desire to apply to the whole of society. Anarchist clubs +and Christian churches are both free associations for the advocacy of +certain ideas, the only difference being in the ideas they advocate. + +In our new world such organizations have been multiplied many fold, and +form a vast superstructure of intellectual activity, built upon the +foundation of the standard wage. In this new world all the people are +free. They are free, not merely from oppression, but from the fear of +oppression; they have leisure and plenty, and they take part naturally +and simply in the intellectual life. The old, of course, have not got +over the dullness which a lifetime of drudgery impressed upon them, but +the young are growing up in a world without classes, and in which it +seems natural that everyone should be educated and everyone should have +ideas. They earn their standard wage, and devote their spare time to +some form of intellectual or artistic endeavor, and spend their spare +money in paying writers and artists and musicians and actors to +stimulate and entertain them. + +These latter are the ways of distinction in our new society; these are +the paths to power. The only rich men in our world are the men who +produce intellectual goods; the great artists, orators, musicians, +actors and writers, who are free to serve or not to serve, as they see +fit, and can therefore hold up the public for any price they care to +charge. Just now there is eager discussion going on in our world as to +whether it is proper for an opera singer, or a moving picture star, or a +novelist, to make a million dollars. Our newspapers are full of +discussions of the question whether anyone can make a million dollars +honestly, and whether men of genius should exploit their public. Some +point out that our most eminent opera singer spends his millions in +endowing a conservatory of art; but others maintain that it would be +better if he lowered his prices of admission, and let the public use its +money in its own way. The extremists are busy founding what they call +the Ten-cent Society, whose members agree to boycott all singers and +actors who charge more than ten cents admission, and all moving picture +stars who receive more than a hundred thousand dollars a year for their +service. These "Ten-centers" do not object to paying the money, but they +object to the commercializing of art, and declare especially that the +moral effect of riches is such that no rich person should ever, under +any circumstances, be allowed to influence the youth of the nation. In +this some of the greatest writers join them, and renounce their +copyrights, and agree to accept a laureateship from some union of +workers, who pay them a generous stipend for the joy and honor of being +associated with their names. The greatest poet of our time began life as +a newsboy, and so the National Newsvenders' Society has adopted him, and +taken his name, and pays him ten thousand dollars a year for the +privilege of publishing his works. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXIV + +MANKIND REMADE + + (Discusses human nature and its weaknesses, and what happens to + these in the new world.) + + +We have briefly sketched the economic arrangements of the co-operative +commonwealth. Let us now consider what are the effects of these +arrangements upon the principal social diseases of capitalism. + +The first and most dreadful of capitalism's diseases is war, and the +economic changes here outlined have placed war, along with piracy and +slavery, among the half-forgotten nightmares of history. We have broken +the "iron ring," and are no longer dependent upon foreign concessions +and foreign markets for the preservation of our social system and the +aggrandizement of a ruling class. We can stay quietly at home and do our +own work, and as we produce nearly everything we need, we no longer have +to threaten our neighbors. Our neighbors know this, and therefore they +do not arm against us, and we have no pretext to arm against them. We +take toward all other civilized nations the attitude which we have taken +toward Canada for the past hundred years. + +We have a small and highly trained army, a few regiments of which are +located at strategic points over the country. This army we regard and +use as we do our fire department. When there is widespread damage by +fire or flood or storm or earthquake, we rush the army to the spot to +attend to the work of rescue and rebuilding. Also, we have a small navy +in international service; for, of course, we are no longer an +independent and self-centered nation; we have come to realize that we +are part of the world community, and have taken our place as one state +in the International Socialist Federation. We send our delegates to the +world parliament, and we place our resources at the disposal of the +world government. However, it now takes but a small army and navy to +preserve order in the world. We govern the backward nations, but the +economic arrangements of the world are such that we are no longer driven +to exploit and oppress them. We send them teachers instead of soldiers, +and as there are really very few people in the world who fight for the +love of fighting, we have little difficulty in preserving peace. We pay +the backward peoples a fair price for their products which we need. Our +world government takes no money out of these countries, but spends it +for the benefit of those who live in the countries, to teach them and +train their young generations for self-government. + +Next, what are the effects of our new arrangements upon political +corruption and graft? The social revolution has broken the prestige of +wealth. Money will buy things, but it no longer buys power, the right to +rule other men; it no longer buys men's admiration. Everybody now has +money, and nobody is any longer afraid of starvation. It is no longer +the fashion to save money--any more than it is the fashion to carry +revolvers in drawing-rooms or to wear chain mail in place of +underclothing. So our political life is cleansed of the money influence. +People now get power by persuading their fellows, not by buying them or +threatening them. The world is no longer full of men ravenous for jobs, +and ready to sell their soul for a "position." So it is no longer +possible to build up a "machine" based on desire for office. + +The changes have resulted in an enormous intensification of our +political activities. We have endless meetings and debates; we have so +many propaganda societies that we cannot keep track of them. And some of +these societies, like the Catholic Church, have a large membership, and +large sums of money at their disposal. But a few experiments at carrying +elections by a "campaign-chest" have convinced everybody that to have +the facts on your side is the only permanent way to political power. Our +new society is jealous of attempts to establish any sort of ruling +class, and the surest way to discredit yourself is to advocate any form +of barrier against freedom of discussion, or the right of the people's +will to prevail. + +Next, what is the status of crime? We have too recently escaped from +capitalism to have been able to civilize entirely our slum population, +and we still have occasional crimes of violence, especially crimes of +passion. But we have almost entirely eliminated those classes of crime +which had to do with property, and we have discovered that this was +ninety-five per cent of all crime. We have eliminated them by the simple +device of making them no longer profitable. Anybody can go into our +community factories, and under clean and attractive working conditions, +and without any loss of prestige or social position, can earn the means +of satisfying his reasonable wants by three hours work a day. Almost +everybody finds this easier than stealing or cheating. + +But more important yet, as a factor in abolishing crime, is the +abolition of class domination and the prestige of wealth. We no longer +have in our community a ruling class which lives without working, and +which offers to the weak-minded and viciously inclined the perpetual +example of luxury. We no longer set much store on jewels and fine +raiment; we do not make costly things, except for public purposes, where +all may enjoy them; and nobody stores great quantities of money, because +everyone has a guarantee of security from the state. So we are gradually +putting our policemen and jailers and judges and lawyers to constructive +work. + +Next, what about disease? The diseases of poverty are entirely done away +with. We are now able to apply the knowledge of science to the whole +community, and so we no longer have to do with tuberculosis and typhoid, +or with rickets and anæmia in children, or with heavy infant mortality. +We have sterilized our unfit, the degenerates and the defectives, and so +do not have to reckon with millions of children from these wretched +stocks. We now give to the question of public health that prominence +which in the old days we used to give to war and the suppression of +crime and social protest. Our public health officers now replace our +generals and admirals, and we really obey their orders. + +Next, as to prostitution. Just as in the case of crime, we are still too +close to capitalism not to have among us the victims of social +depravity, both men and women. We still have a great deal of vice which +springs from untrained animal impulse, and we have some cultivated and +highly sophisticated pornography. But we have entirely done away with +commercial vice, and we have done it by cutting the root which nourished +it. Women in our communities are really free; and by that we do not mean +the empty political freedom which existed in the days of wage +slavery--we mean that women are permanently delivered from economic +inferiority, by the recognition on the part of the state of the money +value of their special kind of work, the bearing and training of +children. This kind of work not merely receives the standard wage, it +also receives the best surgical and nursing treatment free. Housework +and home-making are legally recognized services; and the woman before +marriage and after her children have been nursed is free to go into the +community factories and earn for herself the standard wage, with no loss +of social position. Consequently, no woman sells her sex, and no man +buys it. + +This does not mean, of course, that we have solved the sex problem in +our new society. There are two great social problems with which we have +to deal, the first of these being the sex problem, and the second the +race problem. Our scientists are occupied with eugenics, and we are +finding out how to guide our young people in marriage, so that our race +may be built up, and the ravages of capitalism remedied as quickly as +possible. Also we are trying to find out the laws of happiness and +health in love. We are founding societies for the purpose of protecting +love, and, as hinted in the Book of Love, we have a determined social +struggle between two groups of women--the mother-women and the +mistress-women--those who take love gravely, as a means of improving the +race, and those who take it as a decoration, a form of play. Our men are +embarrassed by having to choose between these groups, and occupy +themselves with trying to keep the struggle from turning into civil war. + +Second, the race problem. Our economic changes have, of course, done +away with some of the bitterest phases of this strife. White workingmen +in the North no longer mob and murder negro workingmen for taking their +jobs, and in the South our land values tax prevents the landlord from +exploiting either white or negro labor. But our white race is still +irresistibly bent upon preserving its integrity of blood, and the more +far-seeing among the negroes have come to realize that there can never +be any real happiness for them in a society where they are denied the +higher social privileges. There is a movement for the development of a +genuine Negro Republic in Africa, and for mass emigration. Also there is +a proposition, soon to be settled at an election, for the dividing of +the United States into three districts upon racial lines. First, there +are to be, in the Far South, three or four states which are inhabited +and governed solely by negroes, and to which white men may come only as +temporary visitors; a large group of states in the North which are white +states, and to which negroes may come only as visitors; and finally, a +middle group of states, in which both whites and black are allowed to +live, as at present, but with the proviso that no one may live there +who takes part in any form of racial strife or agitation. This program +gives to race-conscious negroes their own land, their own civilization, +their own chance of self-realization; it gives to race-conscious white +men the same opportunity; and it leaves to those who are not troubled by +the problem, a country where black and white may dwell in quiet good +fellowship. + +Finally, what has been the effect of our economic changes upon the +purely personal vices which gave us so much trouble and unhappiness in +the old days? What, for example, has been the effect upon vanity? You +should see our new crop of children in our high schools! There are no +longer any social classes among them; the rich ones do not arrive in +private automobiles, to make the poor ones envious, and they do not +isolate themselves in little snobbish cliques. They arrive in community +automobiles, and all wear uniforms--one of the simple devices by which +we repress the impulse of the young toward display of personal egotism. +They are all full of health and happy play, and their heads are busily +occupied with interesting ideas. Our girls are trained to thinking, +instead of to personal adornment; they are developing their minds, +instead of catching a rich husband by sexual charms. So we have been +able, in a single generation of training, to make a real and appreciable +difference in the amount of vanity and self-consciousness to be found +among our young people. + +And the same thing applies to a score of other undesirable qualities, +which, under the system of competitive commercialism, were +overstimulated in human beings. In those old days everyone was seeking +his own survival, and certain qualities which had survival value became +the principal characteristics of our race. Those qualities were greed +and persistence in acquisitiveness, cunning and subtlety, also bragging +and self-assertiveness. In that old world people destroyed their fellows +in order to make their own safety and power; they wasted goods in order +to be esteemed, to preserve what they called their "social position." +But now we have cut the roots of all these vile weeds. We have so +adjusted the business relationships of men that we do not have to have +hysterical religious revivals in order to keep the human factors alive +in their hearts. We have established it as a money fact, which everyone +quickly realizes, that it pays better to co-operate; there is more +profit and less bother in being of service to others. So we have +prepared a soil in which virtues grow instead of vices, and we find +that people become decent and kindly and helpful without exhortation, +and with no more moral effort than the average man can comfortably make. +Of course, we have still personal vices to combat, and new virtues to +discover and to propagate; but this has to do with the future, whereas +we are here confining ourselves to those things which have been +demonstrated in our new society. + + + + +INDEX + + +Abortion, 61 + +Abortions, 30 + +Advertising, 163 + +Agricultural co-operative, 206 + +Anarchism, 210 + +Anarchist, 89, 90 + +Anarchy, 172 + +Anglo-Saxon, 62, 111 + +"Appeal to Reason", 149 + +Aristocratic doctrine, 116 + +Armour, 128 + +Atherton, Gertrude, 87 + + +Babies, 63 + +Bachelorhood, 52 + +Bacon, Francis, 51 + +Banking system, 192 + +Bankruptcy, 162 + +Barbarism, 124 + +Barnum, P. T., 27 + +Berkman, Alexander, 173 + +Biology, 103 + +Birth control, 61, 76 + +Birth Control Review, 64 + +Blatchford, Robert, 55, 161 + +"Blind" love, 58 + +Bolsheviks, 172 + +Breach of promise suit, 91 + +Brothel, 66 + +Brothels, 31 + +Burbank, Luther, 99 + +Business man, 143 + + +Capital, 158 + +Capitalism, 136, 168 + +Capitalists, 142 + +Carnegie, 168 + +Catholic Church, 213, 216 + +Celibacy, 51, 52, 64 + +Chastity, 51 + +Chattel slavery, 186 + +Childbirths, 70 + +Children, 70, 72, 85, 208 + +Christianity, 115, 133 + +"Clarion", 31 + +Class struggle, 133, 177 + +Clay, Henry, 186 + +Coleridge, 85 + +"Collier's Weekly", 122, 163 + +Committee on Waste, 160 + +Commune, 129 + +Communism, 10, 170, 210 + +Compensation, 179 + +Competition, 108, 127 + +Competitive wage system, 148 + +"Complex", 49 + +Comstock, Anthony, 20 + +Confiscation, 179 + +Congress, 138 + +Contraception, 61 + +Co-operation, 109, 199, 200 + +Coquetry, 38 + +Corporation, 127 + +Courtship, 91 + +Credit, 152, 154, 192, 200 + +Credit-cards, 202 + +Crime, 164, 216 + +Culture, 62 + +Cutting, H. C., 200 + + +Dances, 15 + +Debs, Eugene V., 155 + +Degeneration, 121 + +"Demi-monde", 80 + +Democratic doctrine, 115 + +Dictatorship, 180, 183, 185 + +Dill, James B., 25 + +Disarmament, 157 + +Discouragement, 164 + +Disease, 217 + +Divorce, 32, 93, 97 + +Double standard, 5 + +"Douglas plan", 199 + +"Dumping", 152 + + +Economic evolution, 123 + +Economic man, 108 + +Emerson, 186 + +Emulation, 112 + +Engagements, 72 + +England, 120, 156, 175 + +Eugenics, 58 + +Evolution, 122 + +Exogamy, 105 + +Exploitation, 181 + +Exploiting, 148 + +Exports, 153 + + +Factory system, 129 + +Farming, 206 + +"Favorable balance", 151 + +Fear, 122, 164 + +Federal Reserve Act, 154 + +Feminist, 69 + +Feudal stage, 124 + +Fires, 163 + +Foreign trade, 151 + +"Free love", 44, 87 + +"Free lover", 92 + +France, 175 + +France, Anatole, 44 + +Freud, 104 + + +Gens, 9 + +Germany, 155, 156 + +Gillette, King C., 200 + +Goldman, Emma, 173 + +Gonorrhea, 30 + +Goode, Mary J., 41 + +Government, 166 + +"Graft", 127, 216 + +"Great Adventure", 188 + + +Hammurabi, 78 + +"Hamon case", 26 + +"Hard times", 144 + +Hardy, 13 + +Harris, Frank, 21 + +"High life", 23 + +Home, 42, 209 + +Honeymoon, 56 + +Hoover, Herbert, 160 + +House of Commons, 137 + +Huguenots, 134 + +Human nature, 99 + +Hunger, 122 + + +Ideals, 132 + +Imports, 153 + +Income tax, 143, 188 + +Industrial evolution, 126 + +Infant, 103 + +Infanticide, 61 + +Inflation, 196 + +Inheritance tax, 188 + +"Ingenues", 19 + +Instinct, 57 + +Insurance, 163 + +Intellectual production, 211 + +"Iron ring", 158 + +Island, 145 + +I. W. W., 169 + + +James, William, 16 + +Jealousy, 89 + +Jews, 127 + + +Kautsky, Karl, 210 + +"King Coal", 139 + +Kropotkin, 109, 129, 173 + + +Labor, 158 + +Labor checks, 202 + +Labor union, 199 + +Laissez faire, 110 + +Land tax, 190 + +Land titles, 179 + +Land values, 208 + +Late marriage, 67 + +Lecky, 6, 33 + +Leviticus, 78 + +Liberty motor, 164 + +London, Jack, 62 + +Los Angeles Times, 157 + +Love, 34, 47, 100, 112, 218 + +Lust, 48 + +Luther, Martin, 129 + +Luxury, 60 + + +Machinery, 149 + +"Magic gestures", 104 + +Magna Carta, 134 + +Malthusian law, 108 + +Markham, Edwin, 139 + +Marquesas Islands, 33 + +Marriage, 4 + +Marriage club, 71 + +Marriage market, 68 + +Marx, Karl, 132, 138, 176 + +Materialistic interpretation, 132 + +Material production 210 + +Maternity endowment 79 + +Meredith, George 43 + +"Merrie England" 161 + +Metchnikoff, Elie 33, 46 + +Mexico 121 + +Middle class 176, 186 + +Minor, Robert 173 + +Mistress 12 + +Money 37, 192, 202 + +Money Trust 194 + +Monogamy 5, 83, 90 + +Moors 134 + +Moralists 59 + +Morgan 128 + +Mother's pension 79 + +Moving pictures 17 + + +Negro 218 + +Negroes 116 + +Neuroses 105 + +Neurotics 103 + +North Dakota 194 + +North, Luke 188 + + +O'Brien, Frederick 10 + +Oedipus complex 104 + +"Open-shop" 177 + + +Panic 154 + +Parasitism 74 + +Passion 58 + +Permanence 87 + +Piracy 111 + +Pity 74 + +Plumb plan 198 + +Political evolution 123 + +Political revolution 125 + +Politics 213 + +Pornography 20 + +Postal savings bank 195 + +Poverty 40 + +Primitive man 9 + +Privilege 36 + +Professor Sumner 122 + +Profit system 148, 158 + +"Progressive polygamy" 90 + +Proletariat 142 + +Promiscuity 87 + +Property marriage 44 + +Prosperity 144 + +Prostitute 6 + +Prostitution 4, 31, 41, 217 + +Proudhon 179 + +Psycho-analysis 49, 103 + +Public bank 194 + +Publishing 212 + + +Quick, Herbert 165 + + +Race prejudice 62 + +Race problem 218 + +Racial immaturity 116 + +Raffeisen bank 200 + +Reeve, Sidney A. 160 + +Republic 125 + +Research 212 + +"Resurrection" 53 + +Revolt 134 + +Ricardo 108 + +Richardson, Dorothy 26 + +Ring 148 + +Robinson, Dr. William, J, 21, 30, 70, 77 + +Roman Catholic church 90 + +"Romance" 91 + +"Romantic" love 55 + +Roosevelt 61 + +Rulers 119 + +Russia 129, 185 + + +Sanger, Margaret 63 + +School of marriage 75 + +Selection 8 + +Sex 8 + +Sex education 72 + +Sex impulse 46 + +Sex problem 218 + +Sex urge 86 + +Sex war 81 + +Shelley 59, 89 + +"She-towns" 29 + +Shop management 168 + +Sienkiewicz 13 + +Sims, District Attorney 28 + +Single tax 188 + +Slavery 10, 126, 136 + +"Smart set" 24 + +Smith, Adam 108 + +Snobbery 61 + +Socialism, 166 + +Social revolution, 128, 147, 175 + +Soviets, 130, 171 + +"Speeding up", 138 + +Spencer, Herbert, 122 + +Spirituality, 64 + +Sport, 113 + +Standard wage, 203 + +Steel Trust, 137 + +Stopes, Dr. Marie C., 77 + +Strikes, 162 + +Syndicalism, 167 + +Syphilis, 30 + + +Tabu, 9 + +Tariff, 153 + +Taxes, 191 + +Tennyson, 38, 120 + +"The Brass Check", 31, 137 + +"The Conquest of Bread", 173 + +"The Cost of Competition", 160 + +"The Industrial Republic", 202 + +"The Jungle", 139 + +"The Lady", 12 + +"The Long Day", 26, 29 + +"The Nature of Man", 33 + +"The Profits of Religion", 137 + +"The Social Revolution", 210 + +"The Strangle Hold", 200 + +Thompson, A. M., 31 + +Tolstoi, 53 + +"Totem and Taboo", 104 + +"Triangle", 56 + + +Unconscious, 105 + +Unemployment, 147 + + +"Vamps", 19 + +Vanity, 219 + +Varietism, 85 + +Venereal disease, 30, 67, 83 + +Voltaire, 36 + +Voluntary Parenthood League, 64 + + +War, 162 + +Wars, 155 + +Waste, 165 + +Wells, H. G., 89 + +Wharton, Edith, 95 + +"Wild oats", 6 + +White man's burden, 117 + +White, William Allen, 17 + +Worker, 140 + +Workers, 176 + +Working class, 140 + +Woman, 12 + + +"Young love", 56, 73 + + * * * * * + +BOOKS BY UPTON SINCLAIR + +Published by the Author, Pasadena, California + +Trade Distributors: The Paine Book Co., Chicago, [I]. + + +The Brass Check + +A Study of American Journalism + +Who owns the press and why? + +When you read your daily paper, are you reading facts or propaganda? And +whose propaganda? + +Who furnishes the raw material for your thoughts about life? Is it +honest material? + +No man can ask more important questions than these; and here for the +first time the questions are answered in a book. + +The first edition of this book, 23,000 copies, was sold out two weeks +after publication. Paper could not be obtained for printing, and a +carload of brown wrapping paper was used. The printings to date amount +to 144,000 copies. The book is being published in Great Britain and +colonies, and in translations in Germany, France, Holland, Norway, +Sweden, Denmark, Italy, Hungary and Japan. + + HERMANN BESSEMER, _in the "Neues Journal," Vienna_: + + "Upton Sinclair deals with names, only with names, with balances, + with figures, with documents, a truly stunning, gigantic + fact-material. His book is an armored military train which with + rushing pistons roars through the jungle of American monsterlies, + whistling, roaring, shooting, chopping off with Berserker rage the + obscene heads of these evils. A breath-taking, clutching, frightful + book is 'The Brass Check.'" + +(=Prices of all books, unless otherwise stated, cloth $1.20, 3 copies $3, +10 copies $9; paper 60c, 3 copies $1.50, 10 copies $4.50. All prices +postpaid.=) + + +THE BOOK OF LIFE + +A book of practical counsel. Volume One--Mind and Body. Discusses truth +and its standards, and the basis of health, both mental and physical. +Tells people how to live, in order to avoid waste and pain, and to find +happiness and achieve progress. + +Volume Two--Love and Society. Discusses health in sex; love and +marriage, chastity, monogamy, birth control, divorce. Explains modern +economic problems, Socialism, revolution, industrial democracy, and the +future society. Prices of volumes one and two bound in one, cloth $1.50, +paper $1.00. Either of the two volumes separately, cloth $1.20, paper +60c. + + +THE JUNGLE + +This novel, first published in 1906, caused an international sensation. +It was the best selling book in the United States for a year; also in +Great Britain and its colonies. It was translated into seventeen +languages, and caused an investigation by President Roosevelt, and +action by Congress. The book has been out of print for ten years, and is +now reprinted by the author at a lower price than when first published, +although the cost of manufacture has since more than doubled. + + "Not since Byron awoke one morning to find himself famous has there + been such an example of world-wide celebrity won in a day by a book + as has come to Upton Sinclair."--_New York Evening World._ + + "It is a book that does for modern industrial slavery what 'Uncle + Tom's Cabin' did for black slavery. But the work is done far better + and more accurately in 'The Jungle' than in 'Uncle Tom's + Cabin.'"--ARTHUR BRISBANE, _in the New York Evening Journal_. + + +KING COAL + +A novel of the Colorado coal country. + + "Clear, convincing, complete."--LINCOLN STEFFENS. + + "I wish that every word of it could be burned deep into the heart + of every American."--ADOLPH GERMER. + + DEBS AND THE POETS: Edited by Ruth Le Prade, with an introduction + by Upton Sinclair. A collection of poetry about Debs. + +SYLVIA: A novel of the South. + +SYLVIA'S MARRIAGE: A sequel. (Both in cloth only.) + + +100% A STORY OF A PATRIOT + +Would you like to go behind the scenes and see the "invisible +government" of your country saving you from the Bolsheviks and the Reds? +Would you like to meet the secret agents and provocateurs of "Big +Business," to know what they look like, how they talk and what they are +doing to make the world safe for democracy? Several of these gentlemen +have been haunting the home of Upton Sinclair during the past three +years and he has had the idea of turning the tables and investigating +the investigators. He has put one of them, Peter Gudge by name, into a +book, together with Peter's ladyloves, and his wife, and his boss, and a +whole group of his fellow-agents and their employers. + + _From_ LOUIS UNTERMEYER, _Author of "Challenge," etc._: + + "Upton Sinclair has done it again. He has loaded his Maxim (no + Silencer attached), taken careful aim, and--bang!--hit the bell + plump in the center. + + "First of all, '100%' is a story; a story full of suspense, drama, + 'heart interest,' plots, counterplots, high life, low life, humor, + hate and other passions--as thrilling as a W. S. Hart movie, as + interest-crammed as (and a darned sight more truthful than) your + daily newspaper." + + +THEY CALL ME CARPENTER: A TALE OF THE SECOND COMING + +Narrates how Jesus came to Los Angeles in the year 1921, and what +happened to Him. To be published in September, 1922. + + +THE CRY FOR JUSTICE + +An anthology of the literature of social protest, with an introduction +by Jack London, who calls it "this humanist Holy-book." Thirty-two +illustrations, 891 pages. Cloth, $1.50; paper, $1.00. + + "It should rank with the very noblest works of all time. You could + scarcely have improved on its contents--it is remarkable in variety + and scope. Buoyant, but never blatant, powerful and passionate, it + has the spirit of a challenge and a battle cry."--LOUIS UNTERMEYER. + + "You have marvelously covered the whole ground. The result is a + book that radicals of every shade have long been waiting for. You + have made one that every student of the world's thought--economic, + philosophic, artistic--has to have."--REGINALD WRIGHT KAUFFMAN. + + +THE PROFITS OF RELIGION + +A study of supernaturalism as a source of income and a shield to +privilege. The first investigation of this subject ever made in any +language. + + "You have put a lot of work into it and you have marshalled your + facts in, masterly fashion."--WILLIAM MARION REEDY. + + * * * * * + +The following typographical errors have been corrected by the text +transcriber: + +worshiping=>worshipping + +changes takes place=>changes take place + +is an impuse=>is an impulse + +center of continous=>center of continuous + +a starvling beggar at the gates=>a starving beggar at the gates + +of fool nations about sex=>of fool notions about sex + +any personal right in contravened=>any personal right is contravened + +industrial evoluton=>industrial evolution + +to the poeple=>to the people + +Social revoluton=>Social revolution + +her hands and and feet=>her hands and her feet + +Liebault=>Liébault + +Sienkewicz's "Whirlpools"=>Sienkiewicz's "Whirlpools" + +Magna Charta, 134=>Magna Carta, 134 + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and +Body; Vol. II Love and Society, by Upton Sinclair + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BOOK OF LIFE *** + +***** This file should be named 38117-8.txt or 38117-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/8/1/1/38117/ + +Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images available at The Internet Archive) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/38117-8.zip b/38117-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..01fdbe7 --- /dev/null +++ b/38117-8.zip diff --git a/38117-h.zip b/38117-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..93b25d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/38117-h.zip diff --git a/38117-h/38117-h.htm b/38117-h/38117-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8d587d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/38117-h/38117-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,16506 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" +"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"> + <head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> +<title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Book of Life, by Upton Sinclair. +</title> +<style type="text/css"> + p {margin-top:.2em;text-align:justify;margin-bottom:.2em;text-indent:2%;} + +.c {text-align:center;text-indent:0%;} + +.cb {text-align:center;text-indent:0%;font-weight:bold;} + +.eng {font-family:old english text MT;} + +.nind {text-indent:0%;} + +small {font-size: 70%;} + + h1 {text-align:center;clear:both;} + + h2 {margin:8% auto 2% auto;text-align:center;clear:both;font-size:110%;} + + hr {width:90%;margin:2em auto 2em auto;clear:both;color:black;} + + hr.full {width: 50%;margin:5% auto 5% auto;border:4px double gray;} + + table {margin:1% auto 1% auto;margin-right:auto;border:none;text-align:left;} + + body{margin-left:2%;margin-right:2%;background:#fdfdfd;color:black;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;font-size:medium;} + +a:link {background-color:#ffffff;color:blue;text-decoration:none;} + + link {background-color:#ffffff;color:blue;text-decoration:none;} + +a:visited {background-color:#ffffff;color:purple;text-decoration:none;} + +a:hover {background-color:#ffffff;color:#FF0000;text-decoration:underline;} + +.smcap {font-variant:small-caps;font-size:95%;} + + img {border:none;} + +.blockquot{margin:2% auto 2% auto;font-size:95%;} + +.boxx {border:solid 3px black;padding:2%; +max-width:50%;margin:auto;} + +.figcenter {margin:8% auto 8% auto;text-align:center;text-indent:0%;} + +.footnote {width:95%;margin:3% 5% 2% 5%;font-size:0.9em;} + +.label {position:relative;left:-.5em;top:0;text-align:left;font-size:.8em;} + +.fnanchor {vertical-align:30%;font-size:.8em;} +</style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and Body; +Vol. II Love and Society, by Upton Sinclair + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and Body; Vol. II Love and Society + +Author: Upton Sinclair + +Release Date: November 23, 2011 [EBook #38117] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BOOK OF LIFE *** + + + + +Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images available at The Internet Archive) + + + + + + +</pre> + +<hr class="full" /> + + +<p class="cb">THE BOOK OF LIFE</p> + +<p class="figcenter"> +<a href="images/cover_lg.jpg"> +<img src="images/cover.jpg" width="363" height="550" alt="image of the book's cover" title="image of the book's cover" /></a> +</p> + + +<p><a name="VOLUME_I" id="VOLUME_I"></a></p> + +<div class="boxx"> +<h1> +<i>The</i><br /> +<big>Book of Life</big></h1> + +<p class="cb"><i>By</i> UPTON SINCLAIR<br /> +<br /><br /><br /><br /> +<a href="#VOLUME_I">VOLUME ONE:<br /> +MIND AND BODY</a><br /> +<br /> +<a href="#VOLUME_II">VOLUME TWO:<br /> +LOVE AND SOCIETY</a><br /> +<br /><br /><br /><br /> +<small><span class="smcap">Upton Sinclair</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">Pasadena, California</span><br /></small> +———<br /> +<small>WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS</small><br /> +<i>THE PAINE BOOK COMPANY</i><br /> +CHICAGO</p> +</div> + +<p> +<br /> +<br /> +</p> + +<p class="c"> +<span class="smcap">Copyright, 1921, 1922</span><br /> +BY<br /> +UPTON SINCLAIR<br /> +<i>All Rights Reserved.</i><br /> +</p> + +<p> +<br /> +<br /> +</p> + +<p class="cb"> +<i>To</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="eng">Kate Crane Gartz</span><br /> +<br /> +in acknowledgment of her unceasing efforts for a<br /> +better world, and her fidelity to those<br /> +who struggle to achieve it.<br /> +</p> + +<p> +<br /> +<br /> +</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" summary="" +style="border:3px double gray;"> +<tr><td align="center"><a href="#VOLUME_I">Volume I</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center"><a href="#CONTENTS_VOL_I">Contents Volume I</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center"><a href="#INDEX_VOL_I">Index Volume I</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">———</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center"><a href="#VOLUME_II">Volume II</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center"><a href="#CONTENTS_VOL_II">Contents Volume II</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center"><a href="#INDEX_VOL_II">Index Volume II</a></td></tr> +</table> + +<h2><a name="INTRODUCTORY" id="INTRODUCTORY"></a>INTRODUCTORY</h2> + +<p>The writer of this book has been in this world some forty-two years. +That may not seem long to some, but it is long enough to have made many +painful mistakes, and to have learned much from them. Looking about him, +he sees others making these same mistakes, suffering for lack of that +same knowledge which he has so painfully acquired. This being the case, +it seems a friendly act to offer his knowledge, minus the blunders and +the pain.</p> + +<p>There come to the writer literally thousands of letters every year, +asking him questions, some of them of the strangest. A man is dying of +cancer, and do I think it can be cured by a fast? A man is unable to +make his wife happy, and can I tell him what is the matter with women? A +man has invested his savings in mining stock, and can I tell him what to +do about it? A man works in a sweatshop, and has only a little time for +self-improvement, and will I tell him what books he ought to read? Many +such questions every day make one aware of a vast mass of people, +earnest, hungry for happiness, and groping as if in a fog. The things +they most need to know they are not taught in the schools, nor in the +newspapers they read, nor in the church they attend. Of these agencies, +the first is not entirely competent, the second is not entirely honest, +and the third is not entirely up to date. Nor is there anywhere a book +in which the effort has been made to give to everyday human beings the +everyday information they need for the successful living of their lives.</p> + +<p>For the present book the following claims may be made. First, it is a +modern book; its writer watches hour by hour the new achievements of the +human mind, he reaches out for information about them, he seeks to +adjust his own thoughts to them and to test them in his own living. +Second, it is, or tries hard to be, a wise book; its writer is not among +those too-ardent young radicals who leap to the conclusion that because +many old things are stupid and tiresome, therefore everything that is +old is to be spurned with contempt, and everything that proclaims itself +new is to be taken at its own valuation. Third, it is an honest book; +its writer will not pretend to know what he only guesses, and where it +is necessary to guess, he will say so frankly. Finally, it is a kind +book; it is not written for its author's glory, nor for his enrichment, +but to tell you things that may be useful to you in the brief span of +your life. It will attempt to tell you how to live, how to find health +and happiness and success, how to work and how to play, how to eat and +how to sleep, how to love and to marry and to care for your children, +how to deal with your fellow men in business and politics and social +life, how to act and how to think, what religion to believe, what art to +enjoy, what books to read. A large order, as the boys phrase it!</p> + +<p>There are several ways for such a book to begin. It might begin with the +child, because we all begin that way; it might begin with love, because +that precedes the child; it might begin with the care of the body, +explaining that sound physical health is the basis of all right living, +and even of right thinking; it might begin as most philosophies do, by +defining life, discussing its origin and fundamental nature.</p> + +<p>The trouble with this last plan is that there are a lot of people who +have their ideas on life made up in tabloid form; they have creeds and +catechisms which they know by heart, and if you suggest to them anything +different, they give you a startled look and get out of your way. And +then there is another, and in our modern world a still larger class, who +say, "Oh, shucks! I don't go in for religion and that kind of thing." +You offer them something that looks like a sermon, and they turn to the +baseball page.</p> + +<p>Who will read this Book of Life? There will be, among others, the great +American tired business man. He wrestles with problems and cares all +day, and when he sits down to read in the evening, he says: "Make it +short and snappy." There is the wife of the tired business man, the +American perfect lady. She does most of the reading for the family; but +she has never got down to anything fundamental in her life, and mostly +she likes to read about exciting love affairs, which she distinguishes +from the unexciting kind she knows by the word "romance." Then there is +the still more tired American workingman, who has been "speeded up" all +day under the bonus system or the piece-work system, and is apt to fall +asleep in his chair before he finishes supper. Then there is the +workingman's wife, who has slaved all day in the kitchen, and has a +chance for a few minutes' intimacy with her husband before he falls +asleep. She would like to have somebody tell her what to do for croup, +but she is not sure that she has time to discuss the question whether +life is worth living.</p> + +<p>Yet, I wonder; is there a single one among all these tired people, or +even among the cynical people, who has not had some moment of awe when +the thought came stabbing into his mind like a knife: "What a strange +thing this life is! What am I anyhow? Where do I come from, and what is +going to become of me? What do I mean, what am I here for?" I have sat +chatting with three hoboes by a railroad track, cooking themselves a +mulligan in an old can, and heard one of them say: "By God, it's a queer +thing, ain't it, mate?" I have sat on the deck of a ship, looking out +over the midnight ocean and talking with a sailor, and heard him use +almost the identical words. It is not only in the class-room and the +schools that the minds of men are grappling with the fundamental +problems; in fact, it was not from the schools that the new religions +and the great moral impulses of humanity took their origin. It was from +lonely shepherds sitting on the hillsides, and from fishermen casting +their nets, and from carpenters and tailors and shoemakers at their +benches.</p> + +<p>Stop and think a bit, and you will realize it does make a difference +what you believe about life, how it comes to be, where it is going, and +what is your place in it. Is there a heaven with a God, who watches you +day and night, and knows every thought you think, and will some day take +you to eternal bliss if you obey his laws? If you really believe that, +you will try to find out about his laws, and you will be comparatively +little concerned about the success or failure of your business. Perhaps, +on the other hand, you have knocked about in the world and lost your +"faith"; you have been cheated and exploited, and have set out to "get +yours," as the phrase is; to "feather your own nest." But some gust of +passion seizes you, and you waste your substance, you wreck your life; +then you wonder, "Who set that trap and baited it? Am I a creature of +blind instincts, jealousies and greeds and hates beyond my own control +entirely? Am I a poor, feeble insect, blown about in a storm and +smashed? Or do I make the storm, and can I in any part control it?"</p> + +<p>No matter how busy you may be, no matter how tired you may be, it will +pay you to get such things straight: to know a little of what the wise +men of the past have thought about them, and more especially what +science with its new tools of knowledge may have discovered.</p> + +<p>The writer of this book spent nine years of his life in colleges and +universities; also he was brought up in a church. So he knows the +orthodox teachings, he can say that he has given to the recognized wise +men of the world every opportunity to tell him what they know. Then, +being dissatisfied, he went to the unrecognized teachers, the +enthusiasts and the "cranks" of a hundred schools. Finally, he thought +for himself; he was even willing to try experiments upon himself. As a +result, he has not found what he claims is ultimate or final truth; but +he has what he might describe as a rough working draft, a practical +outline, good for everyday purposes. He is going to have confidence +enough in you, the reader, to give you the hardest part first; that is, +to begin with the great fundamental questions. What is life, and how +does it come to be? What does it mean, and what have we to do with it? +Are we its masters or its slaves? What does it owe us, and what do we +owe to it? Why is it so hard, and do we have to stand its hardness? And +can we really know about all these matters, or will we be only guessing? +Can we trust ourselves to think about them, or shall we be safer if we +believe what we are told? Shall we be punished if we think wrong, and +how shall we be punished? Shall we be rewarded if we think right, and +will the pay be worth the trouble?</p> + +<p>Such questions as these I am going to try to answer in the simplest +language possible. I would avoid long words altogether, if I could; but +some of these long words mean certain definite things, and there are no +other words to serve the purpose. You do not refuse to engage in the +automobile business because the carburetor and the differential are +words of four syllables. Neither should you refuse to get yourself +straight with the universe because it is too much trouble to go to the +dictionary and learn that the word "phenomenon" means something else +than a little boy who can play the piano or do long division in his +head.</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" summary="CONTENTS"> + +<tr><th colspan="2" align="center"><a name="CONTENTS_VOL_I" id="CONTENTS_VOL_I"></a><big>CONTENTS</big></th></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2" > </td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><a href="#PART_ONE">PART ONE: THE BOOK OF THE MIND</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2" > </td></tr> +<tr><td align="right" colspan="2"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="1"><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_I">Chapter I.</a> The Nature of Life</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_003">3</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Attempts to show what we know about life; to set the<br /> +bounds of real truth as distinguished from phrases and<br /> +self-deception.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_II">Chapter II.</a> The Nature of Faith</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_008">8</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Attempts to show what we can prove by our reason, and<br /> +what we know intuitively; what is implied in the process<br /> +of thinking, and without which no thought could be.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_III">Chapter III.</a> The Use of Reason</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_012">12</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Attempts to show that in the field to which reason applies<br /> +we are compelled to use it, and are justified in trusting it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_IV">Chapter IV.</a> The Origin of Morality</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Compares the ways of Nature with human morality, and<br /> +tries to show how the latter came to be.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_V">Chapter V.</a> Nature and Man</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_021">21</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Attempts to show how man has taken control of Nature,<br /> +and is carrying on her processes and improving upon them.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_VI">Chapter VI.</a> Man the Rebel</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_027">27</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Shows the transition stage between instinct and reason,<br /> +in which man finds himself, and how he can advance to<br /> +a securer condition.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_VII">Chapter VII.</a> Making Our Morals</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_031">31</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Attempts to show that human morality must change to fit<br /> +human facts, and there can be no judge of it save human<br /> +reason.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_VIII">Chapter VIII.</a> The Virtue of Moderation</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_037">37</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Attempts to show that wise conduct is an adjustment of<br /> +means to ends, and depends upon the understanding of a<br /> +particular set of circumstances.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_IX">Chapter IX.</a> The Choosing of Life</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_042">42</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the standards by which we may judge what is<br /> +best in life, and decide what we wish to make of it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_X">Chapter X.</a> Myself and My Neighbor</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_050">50</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Compares the new morality with the old, and discusses the<br /> +relative importance of our various duties.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XI">Chapter XI.</a> The Mind and the Body</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_053">53</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the interaction between physical and mental<br /> +things, and the possibility of freedom in a world of fixed<br /> +causes.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XII">Chapter XII.</a> The Mind of the Body</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_061">61</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the subconscious mind, what it is, what it does<br /> +to the body, and how it can be controlled and made use<br /> +of by the intelligence.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIII">Chapter XIII.</a> Exploring the Subconscious</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_067">67</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses automatic writing, the analysis of dreams, and<br /> +other methods by which a new universe of life has been<br /> +brought to human knowledge.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIV">Chapter XIV.</a> The Problem of Immortality</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_074">74</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the survival of personality from the moral point<br /> +of view: that is, have we any claim upon life, entitling<br /> +us to live forever?</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XV">Chapter XV.</a> The Evidence for Survival</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_081">81</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the data of psychic research, and the proofs of<br /> +spiritism thus put before us.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVI">Chapter XVI.</a> The Powers of the Mind</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_091">91</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Sets forth the fact that knowledge is freedom and ignorance<br /> +is slavery, and what science means to the people.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVII">Chapter XVII.</a> The Conduct of the Mind</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_098">98</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Concludes the Book of the Mind with a study of how to<br /> +preserve and develop its powers for the protection of our<br /> +lives and the lives of all men.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2" > </td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><a href="#PART_TWO">PART TWO: THE BOOK OF THE BODY</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2" > </td></tr> +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVIII">Chapter XVIII.</a> The Unity of the Body</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_105">105</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the body as a whole, and shows that health is<br /> +not a matter of many different organs and functions, but<br /> +is one problem of one organism.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIX">Chapter XIX.</a> Experiments in Diet</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_115">115</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Narrates the author's adventures in search of health, and<br /> +his conclusions as to what to eat.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XX">Chapter XX.</a> Errors in Diet</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_123">123</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the different kinds of foods, and the part they<br /> +play in the making of health and disease.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXI">Chapter XXI.</a> Diet Standards</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_134">134</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses various foods and their food values, the quantities<br /> +we need, and their money cost.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXII">Chapter XXII.</a> Foods and Poisons</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_145">145</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Concludes the subject of diet, and discusses the effect upon<br /> +the system of stimulants and narcotics.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXIII">Chapter XXIII.</a> More About Health</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_156">156</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the subjects of breathing and ventilation, clothing,<br /> +bathing and sleep.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXIV">Chapter XXIV.</a> Work and Play</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_163">163</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Deals with the question of exercise, both for the idle and<br /> +the overworked.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXV">Chapter XXV.</a> The Fasting Cure</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_169">169</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Deals with Nature's own remedy for disease, and how to<br /> +make use of it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXVI">Chapter XXVI.</a> Breaking the Fast</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_177">177</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses various methods of building up the body after<br /> +a fast, especially the milk diet.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXVII">Chapter XXVII.</a> Diseases and Cures</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_i_page_182">182</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses some of the commoner human ailments, and<br /> +what is known about their cause and cure.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><a href="#INDEX_VOL_I">INDEX VOLUME I</a></td></tr> +</table> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_001" id="vol_i_page_001"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="PART_ONE" id="PART_ONE"></a>PART ONE<br /><br /> +THE BOOK OF THE MIND</h2> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_002" id="vol_i_page_002"></a></p> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_003" id="vol_i_page_003"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I"></a>CHAPTER I<br /><br /> +THE NATURE OF LIFE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Attempts to show what we know about life; to set the bounds of +real truth as distinguished from phrases and self-deception.)</p></div> + +<p>If I could, I would begin this book by telling you what Life is. But +unfortunately I do not know what Life is. The only consolation I can +find is in the fact that nobody else knows either.</p> + +<p>We ask the churches, and they tell us that male and female created He +them, and put them in the Garden of Eden, and they would have been happy +had not Satan tempted them. But then you ask, who made Satan, and the +explanation grows vague. You ask, if God made Satan, and knew what Satan +was going to do, is it not the same as if God did it himself? So this +explanation of the origin of evil gets you no further than the Hindoo +picture of the world resting on the back of a tortoise, and the tortoise +on the head of a snake—and nothing said as to what the snake rests on.</p> + +<p>Let us go to the scientist. I know a certain physiologist, perhaps the +greatest in the world, and his eager face rises before me, and I hear +his quick, impetuous voice declaring that he knows what Life is; he has +told it in several big volumes, and all I have to do is to read them. +Life is a tropism, caused by the presence of certain combinations of +chemicals; my friend knows this, because he has produced the thing in +his test-tubes. He is an exponent of a way of thought called Monism, +which finds the ultimate source of being in forms of energy manifesting +themselves as matter; he shows how all living things arise from that and +sink back into it.</p> + +<p>But question this scientist more closely. What is this "matter" that you +are so sure of? How do you know it? Obviously, through sensations. You +never know matter itself, you only know its effects upon you, and you +assume that the matter must be there to cause the sensation. In other +words, "matter," which seems so real, turns out to be merely "a +permanent possibility of sensation." And suppose there were to be +sensations, caused, for example, by a sportive demon<a name="vol_i_page_004" id="vol_i_page_004"></a> who liked to make +fun of eminent physiologists—then there might be the appearance of +matter and nothing else; in other words, there might be mind, and +various states of mind. So we discover that the materialist, in the +philosophic sense, is making just as large an act of faith, is +pronouncing just as bold a dogma as any priest of any religion.</p> + +<p>This is an old-time topic of disputation. Before Mother Eddy there was +Bishop Berkeley, and before Berkeley, there was Plato, and they and the +materialists disputed until their hearers cried in despair, "What is +Mind? No matter! What is Matter? Never mind!" But a century or two ago +in a town of Prussia there lived a little, dried-up professor of +philosophy, who sat himself down in his room and fixed his eyes on a +church steeple outside the window, and for years on end devoted himself +to examining the tools of thought with which the human mind is provided, +and deciding just what work and how much of it they are fitted to do. So +came the proof that our minds are incapable of reaching to or dealing +with any ultimate reality whatever, but can comprehend only +phenomena—that is to say, appearances—and their relations one with +another. The Koenigsberg professor proved this once for all time, +setting forth four propositions about ultimate reality, and proving them +by exact and irrefutable logic, and then proving by equally exact and +irrefutable logic their precise opposites and contraries. Anybody who +has read and comprehended the four "antinomies" of Immanuel Kant<a name="FNanchor_A_1" id="FNanchor_A_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_A_1" class="fnanchor">[A]</a> +knows that metaphysics is as dead a subject as astrology, and that all +the complicated theories which the philosophers from Heraclitus to +Arthur Balfour have spun like spiders out of their inner consciousness, +have no more relation to reality than the intricacies of the game of +chess.</p> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_A_1" id="Footnote_A_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_A_1"><span class="label">[A]</span></a> See Paulsen: "Life of Kant."</p></div> + +<p>The writer is sorry to make this statement, because he spent a lot of +time reading these philosophers and acquainting himself with their +subtle theories. He learned a whole language of long words, and even the +special meanings which each philosopher or school of philosophers give +to them. When he had got through, he had learned, so far as metaphysics +is concerned, absolutely nothing, and had merely the job of clearing out +of his mind great masses of verbal cobwebs. It was not even good +intellectual training; the metaphysical method of thought is a <i>trap</i>. +The person who thinks in absolutes<a name="vol_i_page_005" id="vol_i_page_005"></a> and ultimates is led to believe that +he has come to conclusions about reality, when as a matter of fact he +has merely proved what he wants to believe; if he had wanted to believe +the opposite, he could have proven that exactly as well—as his +opponents will at once demonstrate.</p> + +<p>If you multiply two feet by two feet, the result represents a plain +surface, or figure of two dimensions. If you multiply two feet by two +feet by two feet, you have a solid, or figure of three dimensions—such +as the world in which we live and move. But now, suppose you multiply +two feet by two feet by two feet by two feet, what does that represent? +For ages the minds of mathematicians and philosophers have been tempted +by this fascinating problem of the "fourth dimension." They have worked +out by analogy what such a world would be like. If you went into this +"fourth dimension," you could turn yourself inside out, and come back to +our present world in that condition, and no one of your three-dimension +friends would be able to imagine how you had managed it, or to put you +back again the way you belonged. And in this, it seems to me, we have +the perfect analogy of metaphysical thinking. It is the "fourth +dimension" of the mind, and plays as much havoc with sound thinking as a +physical "fourth dimension" would play with—say, the prison system. A +man who takes up an absolute—God, immortality, the origin of being, a +first cause, free will, absolute right or wrong, infinite time or space, +final truth, original substance, the "thing in itself"—that man +disappears into a fourth dimension, and turns himself inside out or +upside down or hindside foremost, and comes back and exhibits himself in +triumph; then, when he is ready, he effects another disappearance, and +another change, and is back on earth an ordinary human being.</p> + +<p>The world is full of schools of thought, theologians and metaphysicians +and professors of academic philosophy, transcendentalists and +theosophists and Christian Scientists, who perform such mental +monkey-shines continuously before our eyes. They prove what they please, +and the fact that no two of them prove the same thing makes clear to us +in the end that none of them has proved anything. The Christian +Scientist asserts that there is no such thing as matter, but that pain +is merely a delusion of mortal mind; he continues serene in this faith +until he runs into an automobile and sustains a compound<a name="vol_i_page_006" id="vol_i_page_006"></a> fracture of +the femur—whereupon he does exactly what any of the rest of us do, goes +to a competent surgeon and has the bone set. On the other hand, some +devoted young Socialists of my acquaintance have read Haeckel and +Dietzgen, and adopted the dogma that matter is the first cause, and that +all things have grown out of it and return to it; they have seen that +the brain decays after death, they declare that the soul is a function +of the brain—and because of such theories they deliberately reject the +most powerful modes of appeal whereby men can be swayed to faith in +human solidarity.</p> + +<p>The best books I know for the sweeping out of metaphysical cobwebs are +"The Philosophy of Common Sense" and "The Creed of a Layman," by +Frederic Harrison, leader of the English Positivists, a school of +thought established by Auguste Comte. But even as I recommend these +books, I recall the dissatisfaction with which I left them; for it +appears that the Positivists have their dogmas like all the rest. Mr. +Harrison is not content to say that mankind has not the mental tools for +dealing with ultimate realities; he must needs prove that mankind never +will and never can have these tools, I look back upon the long process +of evolution and ask myself, What would an oyster think about +Positivism? What would be the opinion of, let us say, a young turnip on +the subject of Mr. Frederic Harrison's thesis? It may well be that the +difference between a turnip and Mr. Harrison is not so great as will be +the difference between Mr. Harrison and that super-race which some day +takes possession of the earth and of all the universe. It does not seem +to me good science or good sense to dogmatize about what this race will +know, or what will be its tools of thought. What does seem to me good +science and good sense is to take the tools which we now possess and use +them to their utmost capacity.</p> + +<p>What is it that we know about life? We know a seemingly endless stream +of sensations which manifest themselves in certain ways, and seem to +inhere in what we call things and beings. We observe incessant change in +all these phenomena, and we examine these changes and discover their +ways. The ways seem to be invariable; so completely so that for +practical purposes we assume them to be invariable, and base all our +calculations and actions upon this assumption. Manifestly, we could not +live otherwise, and the spread of scientific knowledge<a name="vol_i_page_007" id="vol_i_page_007"></a> is the further +tracing out of such "laws"—that is to say, the ways of behaving of +existence—and the extending of our belief in their invariability to +wider and wider fields.</p> + +<p>Once upon a time we were told that "the wind bloweth where it listeth." +But now we are quite certain that there are causes for the blowing of +the wind, and when our researches have been carried far enough, we shall +be able to account for and to predict every smallest breath of air. Once +we were told that dreams came from a supernatural world; but now we are +beginning to analyze dreams, and to explain what they come from and what +they mean. Perhaps we still find human nature a bewildering and +unaccountable thing; but some day we shall know enough of man's body and +his mind, his past and his present, to be able to explain human nature +and to produce it at will, precisely as today we produce certain +reactions in our test-tubes, and do it so invariably that the most +cautious financier will invest tens of millions of dollars in a process, +and never once reflect that he is putting too much trust in the +permanence of nature.</p> + +<p>In many departments of thought great specialists are now working, +experimenting and observing by the methods of science. If in the course +of this book we speak of "certainty," we mean, of course, not the +"absolute" certainty of any metaphysical dogma, but the practical +certainty of everyday common sense; the certainty we feel that eating +food will satisfy our hunger, and that tomorrow, as today, two and two +will continue to make four.<a name="vol_i_page_008" id="vol_i_page_008"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II"></a>CHAPTER II<br /><br /> +THE NATURE OF FAITH</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Attempts to show what we can prove by our reason, and what we know +intuitively; what is implied in the process of thinking, and +without which no thought could be.)</p></div> + +<p>The primary fact that we know about life is growth. Herbert Spencer has +defined this growth, or evolution, in a string of long words which may +be summed up to mean: the process whereby a number of things which are +simple and like one another become different parts of one thing which is +complex. If we observe this process in ourselves, and the symptoms of it +in others, we discover that when it is proceeding successfully, it is +accompanied by a sensation of satisfaction which we call happiness or +pleasure; also that when it is thwarted or repressed, it is accompanied +by a different sensation which we call pain. Subtle metaphysicians, both +inside the churches and out, have set themselves to the task of proving +that there must be some other object of life than the continuance of +these sensations of pleasure which accompany successful growth. They +have proven to their own satisfaction that morality will collapse and +human progress come to an end unless we can find some other motive, +something more permanent and more stimulating, something "higher," as +they phrase it. All I can say is that I gave reverent attention to the +arguments of these moralists and theologians, and that for many years I +believed their doctrines; but I believe them no longer.</p> + +<p>I interpret the purpose of life to be the continuous unfoldment of its +powers, its growth into higher forms—that is to say, forms more complex +and subtly contrived, capable of more intense and enduring kinds of that +satisfaction which is nature's warrant of life. If you wish to take up +this statement and argue about it, please wait until you have read the +chapter "Nature and Man," and noted my distinction between instinctive +life and rational life. For men, the word "growth" does not mean <i>any</i> +growth, <i>all</i> growth, blind and indiscriminate growth. It does not mean +growth for the tubercle bacillus, nor growth for the anopheles mosquito, +nor growth for the<a name="vol_i_page_009" id="vol_i_page_009"></a> house-fly, the spider and the louse. Neither do we +mean that the purpose of man's own life is <i>any</i> pleasure, <i>all</i> +pleasure, blind and indiscriminate pleasure; the pleasure of alcohol, +the pleasure of cannibalism, the pleasure of the modern form of +cannibalism which we call "making money." We have survived in the +struggle for existence by the cooperative and social use of our powers +of judgment; and our judgment is that which selects among forms of +growth, which gives preference to wheat and corn over weeds, and to +self-control and honesty over treachery and greed.</p> + +<p>So when we say that the purpose of life is happiness, we do not mean to +turn mankind loose at a hog-trough; we mean that our duty as thinkers is +to watch life, to test it, to pick and choose among the many forms it +offers, and to say: This kind of growth is more permanent and full of +promise, it is more fertile, more deeply satisfactory; therefore, we +choose this, and sanction the kind of pleasure which it brings. Other +kinds we decide are temporary and delusive; therefore we put in jail +anyone who sells alcoholic drink, and we refuse to invite to our home +people who are lewd, and some day we shall not permit our children to +attend moving picture shows in which the modern form of cannibalism is +glorified.</p> + +<p>The reader, no doubt, has been taught a distinction between "science" +and "faith." He is saying now, "You believe that everything is to be +determined by human reason? You reject all faith?" I answer, No; I am +not rejecting faith; I am merely refusing to apply it to objects with +which it has nothing to do. You do not take it as a matter of faith that +a package of sugar weighs a pound; you put it on the scales and find +out—in other words, you make it a matter of experiment. But all the +creeds of all the religious sects are full of pronouncements which are +no more matters of faith than the question of the weighing of sugar. Is +pork a wholesome article of food or is it not? All Christians will +readily acknowledge that this is a matter to be determined by the +microscope and other devices of experimental science; but then some Jew +rises in the meeting and puts the question: Is dancing injurious to the +character? And immediately all members of the Methodist Episcopal Church +vote to close the discussion.</p> + +<p>What is faith? Faith is the instinct which underlies all being, assuring +us that life is worth while and honest, a thing to be trusted; in other +words, it is the certainty that successful<a name="vol_i_page_010" id="vol_i_page_010"></a> growth always is and always +will be accompanied by pleasure. The most skeptical scientist in the +world, even my friend the physiologist who proves that life is nothing +but a tropism, and can be produced by mixing chemicals in +test-tubes—this eager friend is one of the most faithful men I know. He +is burning up with the faith that knowledge is worth possessing, and +also that it is possible of attainment. With what boundless scorn would +he receive any suggestion to the contrary—for example, the idea that +life might be a series of sensations which some sportive demon is +producing for the torment of man! More than that, this friend is burning +up with the certainty that knowledge can be spread, that his fellow men +will receive it and apply it, and that it will make them happy when they +do. Why else does he write his learned books in defense of the +materialist philosophy?</p> + +<p>And that same faith which animates the great monist animates likewise +every child who toddles off to school, and every chicken which emerges +from an egg, and every blade of grass which thrusts its head above the +ground. Not every chicken survives, of course, and all the blades of +grass wither in the fall; nevertheless, the seeds of grass are spread, +and chickens make food for philosophers, and the great process of life +continues to manifest its faith. In the end the life process produces +man, who, as we shall presently see, takes it up, and judges it, and +makes it over to suit himself.</p> + +<p>You will note from this that I am what is called an optimist; whereas +some of the great philosophers of the world have called themselves +pessimists. But I notice with a smile that these are often the men who +work hardest of all to spread their ideas, and thus testify to the +worthwhileness of truth and the perfectibility of mankind. There has +come to be a saying among settlement workers and physicians, who are +familiar with poverty and its effects upon life, that there are no bad +babies and good babies, there are only sick babies and well babies. In +the same way, I would say there are no pessimists and optimists, there +are only mentally sick people and mentally well people. Everywhere +throughout life, both animal and vegetable, health means happiness, and +gives abundant evidence of that fact. All healthy life is satisfactory +to itself; when it develops reason, it tries to find out why, and this +is yet another testimony to the fact that having power and using it is +pleasant. When I was in college the professor would<a name="vol_i_page_011" id="vol_i_page_011"></a> propound the old +question: "Would you rather be a happy pig or an unhappy philosopher?" +My answer always was: "I would rather be a happy philosopher." The +professor replied: "Perhaps that is not possible." But I said: "I will +prove that it is!"<a name="vol_i_page_012" id="vol_i_page_012"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III"></a>CHAPTER III<br /><br /> +THE USE OF REASON</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Attempts to show that in the field to which reason applies we are +compelled to use it, and are justified in trusting it.)</p></div> + +<p>The great majority of people are brought up to believe that some +particular set of dogmas are objects of faith, and that there are +penalties more or less severe for the application of reason to these +dogmas. What particular set it happens to be is a matter of geography; +in a crowded modern city like New York, it is a matter of the particular +block on which the child is born. A child born on Hester Street will be +taught that his welfare depends upon his never eating meat and butter +from the same dish. A child born on Tenth Avenue will be taught that it +is a matter of his not eating meat on Fridays. A child born on Madison +Avenue will be taught that it is a question of the precise metaphysical +process by which bread is changed into human body and wine into human +blood. Each of these children will be assured that his human reason is +fallible, that it is extremely dangerous to apply it to this "sacred" +subject, and that the proper thing to do is to accept the authority of +some ancient tradition, or some institution, or some official, or some +book for which a special sanction is claimed.</p> + +<p>Has there ever been in the world any revelation, outside of or above +human reason? Could there ever be such a thing? In order to test this +possibility, select for yourself the most convincing way by which a +special revelation could be handed down to mankind. Take any of the +ancient orthodox ways, the finding of graven tablets on a mountain-top, +or a voice speaking from a burning bush, or an angel appearing before a +great concourse of people and handing out a written scroll. Suppose that +were to happen, let us say, at the next Yale-Harvard football game; +suppose the news were to be flashed to the ends of the earth that God +had thus presented to mankind an entirely new religion. What would be +the process by which the people of London or Calcutta would decide upon +that revelation? First, they would have to consider the question<a name="vol_i_page_013" id="vol_i_page_013"></a> +whether it was an American newspaper fake—by no means an easy question. +Second, they would have to consider the chances of its being an optical +delusion. Then, assuming they accepted the sworn testimony of ten +thousand mature and competent witnesses, they would have to consider the +possibility of someone having invented a new kind of invisible +aeroplane. Assuming they were convinced that it was really a +supernatural being, they would next have to decide the chances of its +being a visitor from Mars, or from the fourth dimension of space, or +from the devil. In considering all this, they would necessarily have to +examine the alleged revelation. What was the literary quality of it? +What was the moral quality of it? What would be the effect upon mankind +if the alleged revelation were to be universally adopted and applied?</p> + +<p>Manifestly, all these are questions for the human reason, the human +judgment; there is no other method of determining them, there would be +nothing for any individual person, or for men as a whole to do, except +to apply their best powers, and, as the phrase is, "make up their minds" +about the matter. Reason would be the judge, and the new revelation +would be the prisoner at the bar. Humanity might say, this is a real +inspiration, we will submit ourselves to it and follow it, and allow no +one from now on to question it. But inevitably there would be some who +would say, "Tommyrot!" There would be others who would say, "This new +revelation isn't working, it is repressing progress, it is stifling the +mind." These people would stand up for their conviction, they would +become martyrs, and all the world would have to discuss them. And who +would decide between them and the great mass of men? Reason, the judge, +would decide.</p> + +<p>It is perfectly true that human reason is fallible. Infallibility is an +absolute, a concept of the mind, and not a reality. Life has not given +us infallibility, any more than it has given us omniscience, or +omnipotence, or any other of those attributes which we call divine. Life +has given us powers, more or less weak, more or less strong, but all +capable of improvement and development. Reason is the tool whereby +mankind has won supremacy over the rest of the animal kingdom, and is +gradually taking control of the forces of nature. It is the best tool we +have, and because it is the best, we are driven irresistibly to use it. +And how strange that some of us can find no better use for it than to +destroy its<a name="vol_i_page_014" id="vol_i_page_014"></a> own self! Visit one of the Jesuit fathers and hear him seek +to persuade you that reason is powerless against faith and must abdicate +to faith. You answer, "Yes, father, you have persuaded me. I admit the +fallibility of my mortal powers; and I begin by applying my doubts of +them to the arguments by which you have just convinced me. I was +convinced, but of course I cannot be sure of a conviction, attained by +fallible reason. Therefore I am just where I was before—except that I +am no longer in position to be certain of anything."</p> + +<p>You answer in good faith, and take up your hat and depart, closing the +door of the good father's study behind you. But stop a moment, why do +you close the door? You close the door because your reason tells you +that otherwise the cold air outside will blow in and make the good +father uncomfortable. You put your hat on, because your reason has not +yet been applied to the problem of the cause of baldness. You step out +onto the street, and when you hear a sudden noise, you step back onto +the curbstone, because your reason tells you that an automobile is +coming, and that on the sidewalk you are safe from it. So you go on, +using your reason in a million acts of your life whereby your life is +preserved and developed. And if anybody suggested that the fallibility +of your reason should cause you to delay in front of an automobile, you +would apply your reason to the problem of that person and decide that he +was insane. And I say that just as there is insanity in everyday +judgments and relationships, so there is insanity in philosophy, +metaphysics and religion; the seed and source of all this kind of +insanity being the notion that it is the duty of anybody to believe +anything which cannot completely justify itself as reasonable.</p> + +<p>Nowadays, as ideas are spreading, the champions of dogma are hard put to +it, and you will find their minds a muddle of two points of view. The +Jewish rabbi will strive desperately to think of some hygienic objection +to the presence of meat and butter on the same plate; the Catholic +priest will tell you that fish is a very wholesome article of food, and +that anyhow we all eat too much; the Methodist and the Baptist and the +Presbyterian will tell you that if men did not rest one day in seven +their health would break down. Thus they justify faith by reason, and +reconcile the conflict between science and theology. Accepting this +method, I experiment and learn that it improves my digestion and adds to +my working power if I<a name="vol_i_page_015" id="vol_i_page_015"></a> play tennis on Sunday. I follow this indisputably +rational form of conduct—and find myself in conflict with the "faith" +of the ancient State of Delaware, which obliges me to serve a term in +its state's prison for having innocently and unwittingly desecrated its +day of holiness!</p> + +<p>If you read Professor Bury's little book, "A History of Freedom of +Thought," you will discover that there has been a long conflict over the +right of men to use their minds—and the victory is not yet. The term +"free thinker," which ought to be the highest badge a man could wear, is +still almost everywhere throughout America a term of vague terror. In +the State of California today there is a Criminal Syndicalism Act, which +provides a maximum of fourteen years in jail for any person who shall +write or publish or speak any words expressive of the idea that the +United States government should be overthrown in the same way that it +was established—that is, by force; only a few months ago the writer of +this book was on the witness stand for two days, and had the painful, +almost incredible experience of being battered and knocked about by an +inquisitive district attorney, who cross-examined him as to every detail +of his beliefs, and read garbled extracts from his published writings, +in the effort to make it appear that he held some belief which might +possibly prejudice the jury against him. The defendant in this case, a +returned soldier who had spent three years as a volunteer in the +trenches, and had been twice wounded and once gassed, was accused, not +merely of approving the Soviet form of government, but also of having +printed uncomplimentary references to priests and religious +institutions.</p> + +<p>Nowadays it is the propertied class which has taken possession of the +powers of government, and which presumes to censor the thinking of +mankind in its own interest. But whether it be priestcraft or whether it +be capitalism which seeks to bind the human mind, it comes to the same +thing, and the effort must be met by the assertion that, in spite of +errors and blunders, and the serious harm these may do, there is no way +for men to advance save by using the best powers of thinking they +possess, and proclaiming their conclusions to others. Speaking +theologically for the moment, God has given us our reasoning powers, and +also the impulse to use them, and it is inconceivable that He should +seek to restrict their use, or should give to anyone the power to forbid +their use.<a name="vol_i_page_016" id="vol_i_page_016"></a> It is His truth which we seek, and His which we proclaim. In +so doing we perform our highest act of faith, and we refuse to be +troubled by the idea that for this service He will reward us by an +eternity of sulphur and brimstone.</p> + +<p>Throughout the remainder of this book it will be assumed that the reader +accepts this point of view, or, at any rate, that he is willing for +purposes of experiment to give it a trial and see where it leads him. We +shall proceed to consider the problems of human life in the light of +reason, to determine how they come to be, and how they can be solved.<a name="vol_i_page_017" id="vol_i_page_017"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></a>CHAPTER IV<br /><br /> +THE ORIGIN OF MORALITY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Compares the ways of nature with human morality, and tries to show +how the latter came to be.)</p></div> + +<p>Seventy years ago Charles Darwin published his book, "The Origin of +Species," in which he defied the theological dogma of his time by the +shocking idea that life had evolved by many stages of progress from the +diatom to man. This of course did not conform to the story of the Garden +of Eden, and so "Darwinism" was fought as an invention of the devil, and +in the interior of America there are numerous sectarian colleges where +the dread term "evolution" is spoken in awed whispers. Only the other +day I read in my newspaper the triumphant proclamation of some clergyman +that "Darwinism" had been overthrown. This reverend gentleman had got +mixed up because some biologists were disputing some detail of the +method by which the evolution of species had been brought about. Do +species change by the gradual elimination of the unfit, or do they +change by sudden leaps, the "mutation" theory of de Vries? Are acquired +powers transmitted to posterity, or is the germ plasm unaffected by its +environment? Concerning such questions the scientists debate. But the +fact that life has evolved in an ordered series from the lower forms to +the higher, and that each individual reproduces in embryo and in infancy +the history of this long process—these facts are now the basis of all +modern thinking, and as generally accepted as the rotation of the earth.</p> + +<p>You may study this process of evolution from the outside, in the +multitude of forms which it has assumed and in their reactions one to +another; or you may study it from the inside in your own soul, the +emotions which accompany it, the impulse or craving which impels it, the +<i>élan vital</i>, as it is called by the French philosopher Bergson. The +Christians call it love, and Nietzsche, who hated Christianity, called +it "the will to power," and persuaded himself that it was the opposite +of love.</p> + +<p>You will find in the essays of Professor Huxley, one entitled<a name="vol_i_page_018" id="vol_i_page_018"></a> +"Evolution and Ethics," in which he sets forth the complete unmorality +of nature, and declares that there is no way by which what mankind knows +as morality can have originated in the process of nature or can be +reconciled to natural law. This statement, coming from a leading +agnostic, was welcome to the theologians. But when I first read the +essay, as a student of sixteen, it seemed to me narrow; I thought I saw +a standpoint from which the contradiction disappeared. The difference +between the morality of Christ and the morality of nature is merely the +difference between a lower and a higher stage of mental development. The +animal loves and seeks by instinct to preserve the life which it +knows—that is to say, its own life and the life of its young. The wolf +knows nothing about the feelings of a deer; but man in his savage state +develops reasoning powers enough to realize that there are others like +himself, the members of his own tribe, and he makes for himself taboos +which forbid him to kill and eat the members of that tribe. At the +present time humanity has developed its reason and imaginative sympathy +to include in the "tribe" one or two hundred million people; while to +those outside the tribe it still preserves the attitude of the wolf.</p> + +<p>How came it that a mind so acute as Huxley's went so far astray on the +question of the evolution of morality? The answer is that this was the +factory age in England, and the great scientist, a rebel in theological +matters, was in economics a child of his time. We find him using the +formulas of bourgeois biology to ridicule Henry George and his plea for +the freeing of the land. "Competition is the life of trade," ran the +nineteenth century slogan; and competition was the god of nineteenth +century biology. Tennyson summed it up in the phrase: "Nature red in +tooth and claw with ravin;" and this was found convenient by Manchester +manufacturers who wished to shut little children up for fourteen hours a +day in cotton mills, and to harness women to drag cars in the coal +mines, and to be told by the learned men of their colleges and the holy +men of their churches that this was "the survival of the fittest," it +was nature's way of securing the advancement of the race.</p> + +<p>But now we are preparing for an era of cooperation, and it occurs to our +men of science to go back to nature and find out what really are her +ways. If you will read Kropotkin's "Mutual Aid as a Factor in +Evolution," you will find a complete<a name="vol_i_page_019" id="vol_i_page_019"></a> refutation of the old bourgeois +biology, and a view of nature which reveals in it the germs of human +morality. Kropotkin points out that everywhere throughout nature it is +the social and not the solitary animals which are most numerous and most +successful. There are many millions of ants and bees for every hawk or +eagle, and certainly in the state of nature there were thousands of deer +for every lion or tiger that preyed upon them. And all these social +creatures have their ways of being, which it requires no stress of the +imagination to compare with the tribal customs and the moral codes of +mankind. The different animals prey upon one another, but they do not +prey upon their own species, except in a few rare cases. The only beast +that makes a regular practice of exploiting his own kind is man.</p> + +<p>By hundreds of interesting illustrations Kropotkin shows that mutual aid +and mutual self-protection are the means whereby the higher forms of +being have been evolved. Insects and birds and fish, nearly all the +herbivorous mammals, and even a great many of the carnivores, help one +another and protect one another. The chattering monkeys in the treetops +drove out the saber-tooth tiger from the grove because there were so +many of them, and when they saw him they all set up a shriek and clamor +which deafened and confused him. And when by and by these monkeys +developed an opposed thumb, and broke off a branch of a tree for a club, +and fastened a sharp stone on the end of it for an axe, and fell upon +the saber-toothed tiger and exterminated him, they did it because they +had learned solidarity—even as the workers of the world are today +learning solidarity in the face of the beast of capitalism.</p> + +<p>Man has survived by the cunning of his brain, we are told, and that is +true. But first among the products of that cunning brain has been the +knowledge that by himself he is the most helpless and pitiful of +creatures, while standing together and forming societies and developing +moralities, he is master of the world. He has not yet learned that +lesson entirely; he has learned it only for his own nation. Therefore he +takes the highest skill of his hand and the subtlest wit of his brain, +and uses them to manufacture poison gases. At the present hour he is +painfully realizing that his poison formulas all become known to the +tribes whom he calls his enemies, and so it is his own destruction he is +engaged in contriving. In<a name="vol_i_page_020" id="vol_i_page_020"></a> other words, man has come to a time when his +mechanical skill, his mastery over the forces of nature, has developed +more rapidly than his moral sense and his imaginative sympathy. His +ability to destroy life has become dangerously greater than his desire +to preserve it. So he confronts the fair face of nature as an insane +creature, wrecking not merely everything that he himself has built up, +but everything that nature has built in the ages before him. He is +striving now with infinite agony to make this fact real to himself, and +to mend his evil ways; and the first step in that process is to root out +from his mind the devil's doctrine which in his blindness and greed he +has himself implanted, that there is any way for him to find real +happiness, or to make any worth while progress on this earth, by the +method of inflicting misery and torment upon his fellow men.<a name="vol_i_page_021" id="vol_i_page_021"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V"></a>CHAPTER V<br /><br /> +NATURE AND MAN</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Attempts to show how man has taken control of nature, and is +carrying on her processes and improving upon them.)</p></div> + +<p>If the argument of the preceding chapter is sound, human morality is not +a fixed and eternal set of laws, but is, like everything else in the +world, a product of natural evolution. We can trace the history of it, +just as we trace the story of the rocks. It is not a mysterious or +supernatural thing, it is simply the reaction of man to his environment, +and more especially to his fellow men. The source of it is that same +inner impulse, that love of life, that joy in growing, that faith which +appears to be the soul of all being.</p> + +<p>Man is a part of nature and a product of nature; in many fundamental +respects his ways are still nature's ways and his laws still nature's +laws. But there are other and even more significant ways in which man +has separated himself from nature and made himself something quite +different. In order to reveal this clearly, we draw a distinction +between nature and man. This is a proper thing to do, provided we bear +in mind that our classification is not permanent or final. We +distinguish frogs from tadpoles, in spite of the fact that at one stage +the creature is half tadpole and half frog. We distinguish the animal +from the vegetable kingdom, despite the fact that in their lower forms +they cannot be distinguished.</p> + +<p>What, precisely, is the difference between nature and man? The +difference lies in the fact that nature is apparently blind in her +processes; she produces a million eggs in order to give life to one +salmon, she produces countless millions of salmon to be devoured by +other fish apparently no better than salmon. Poets may take up the +doctrine of evolution and dress it out in theological garments, talking +about the "one far off divine event towards which the whole creation +moves," but for all we can see, nature, apart from man, is just as well +satisfied to move in circles, and to come back exactly where she +started. Nature made a whole world of complicated creatures in the +steamy, luke-warm swamps of the Mesozoic era, and then, as if deciding<a name="vol_i_page_022" id="vol_i_page_022"></a> +that the pattern of a large body and a small brain was not a success, +she froze them all to death with a glacial epoch, and we have nothing +but the bones to tell us about them.</p> + +<p>No one understands anything about evolution until he has realized that +the phrase "the survival of the fittest" does not mean the survival of +the best from any human point of view. It merely means the survival of +those capable of surviving in some particular environment. We consider +our present civilization as "fit"; but if astronomical changes should +cause another ice age, we should discover that our "fitness" depended +upon our ability to live on lichens, or on something we could grow by +artificial light in the bowels of the earth.</p> + +<p>So much for our ancient mother, nature. But now—whether we say with the +theologians that it was divine providence, or with the materialist +philosophers that it was an accidental mixing of atoms—at any rate it +has come about that nature has recently produced creatures who are +conscious of her process, who are able to observe and criticize it, to +take up her work and carry it on in their own way, for better or for +worse. Whether by accident or design, there has been on parts of our +planet such a combination of climate and soil as has brought into being +a new product of nature, a heightened form of life which we call +"intelligence." Creation opens its eyes, and beholds the work of the +creator, and decides that it is good—yet not so good as it might be! +Creation takes up the work of the creator, and continues it, in many +respects annulling it, in other respects revising it entirely. Whether a +sonnet is a better or a higher product than a spider is a question it +would be futile to discuss; but this, at least, should be clear—nature +has produced an infinity of spiders, but nature never produced a sonnet, +nor anything resembling it.</p> + +<p>Man, the creature of God, takes over the functions of God. This fact may +shock us, or it may inspire us; to the metaphysically minded it offers a +great variety of fascinating problems. Can it be that God is in process +of becoming, that there is no God until he has become, in us and through +us? H. G. Wells sets forth this curious idea; and then, of course, the +bishops and the clergy rise up in indignation and denounce Mr. Wells as +an upstart and trespasser upon their field. They have been worshipping +their God for some three or four thousand years, and know that He has +been from eternity; He created the world at His will, and how shall +impious man<a name="vol_i_page_023" id="vol_i_page_023"></a> presume to rise up and criticize His product, and imagine +that he can improve upon it? Man, with his cheap and silly little toys, +his sonnets and scientific systems, his symphony concerts and such pale +imitations of celestial harmonies!</p> + +<p>Mr. Wells, in his character of God in the making, has created a bishop +of his own, and no doubt would maintain the thesis that he is a far +better bishop than any created by the God of the Anglican churches. We +will leave Mr. Wells' bishop to argue these problems with God's bishops, +and will merely remind the reader of our warning about these +metaphysical matters. You can prove anything and everything, whichever +and however, all or both; and discussions of the subject are merely your +enunciation of the fact that you have your private truth as you want it. +It may be that there is an Infinite Consciousness, which carries the +whole process of creation in itself, and that all the seeming wastes and +blunders of nature can be explained from some point of view at present +beyond the reach of our minds. On the other hand it may be that +consciousness is now dawning in the universe for the first time. It may +be that it is an accident, a fleeting product like the morning mist on +the mountain top. On the other hand, it may be that it is destined to +grow and expand and take control of the entire universe, as a farmer +takes control of a field for his own purposes. It may be that just as +our individual fragments of intelligence communicate and merge into a +family, a club, a nation, a world culture, so we shall some day grope +our way toward the consciousness of other planets, or of other states of +being subsisting on this planet unknown to us, or perhaps even toward +the cosmic soul, the universal consciousness which we call God.</p> + +<p>But meantime, all we can say with positiveness is this: man, the +created, is becoming the creator. He is taking up the world purpose, he +is imposing upon it new purposes of his own, he is attempting to impose +upon it a moral code, to test it and discipline it by a new standard +which he calls economy. To the present writer this seems the most +significant fact about life, the most fascinating point of view from +which life can be regarded. The reader who wishes to follow it into +greater detail is referred to a little book by Professor E. Ray +Lankester, "The Kingdom of Man"; especially the opening essay, with its +fascinating title, "Nature's Insurgent Son."</p> + +<p>In what ways have the reasoned and deliberate purposes of<a name="vol_i_page_024" id="vol_i_page_024"></a> man revised +and even supplanted the processes of nature? The ways are so many that +it would be easier to mention those in which he has not done so. A +modern civilized man is hardly content with anything that nature does, +nor willing to accept any of nature's products. He will not eat nature's +fruits, he prefers the kinds that he himself has brought into being. He +is not content with the skin that nature has given him; he has made +himself an infinite variety of complicated coverings. He objects to +nature's habit of pouring cold water upon him, and so he has built +himself houses in which he makes his own climate; he has recently taken +to creating for himself houses which roll along the ground, or which fly +through the air, or which swim under the surface of the sea; so he +carries his private climate with him to all these places. It was +nature's custom to remove her blunders and her experiments quickly from +her sight. But man has decided that he loves life so well that he will +preserve even the imbeciles, the lame and the halt and the blind. In a +state of nature, if a man's eyes were not properly focused, he blundered +into the lair of a tiger and was eaten. But civilized man despises such +a method of maintaining the standard of human eyes; he creates for +himself a transparent product, ground to such a curve that it corrects +the focus of his eyes, and makes them as good as any other eyes. In ten +thousand such ways we might name, man has rebelled against the harshness +of his ancient mother, and has freed himself from her control.</p> + +<p>But still he is the child of his mother, and so it is his way to act +first, and then to realize what he has done. So it comes about that very +few, even of the most highly educated men, are aware how completely the +ancient ways of nature have been suppressed by her "insurgent son." It +is a good deal as in the various trades and professions which have +developed with such amazing rapidity in modern civilization; the paper +man knows how to make paper, the shoe man knows how to make shoes, the +optician knows about grinding glasses, but none of these knows very much +about the others' specialties, and has no realization of how far the +other has gone. So it comes about that in our colleges we are still +teaching ancient and immutable "laws of nature," which in the actual +practice of men at work are as extinct and forgotten as the dodo. In all +colleges, except a few which have been tainted by<a name="vol_i_page_025" id="vol_i_page_025"></a> Socialist thought, +the students are solemnly learning the so-called "Malthusian law," that +population presses continually upon the limits of subsistence, there are +always a few more people in every part of the world than that part of +the world is able to maintain. At any time we increase the world's +productive powers, population will increase correspondingly, so there +can never be an end to human misery, and abortion, war and famine are +simply nature's eternal methods of adjusting man to his environment.</p> + +<p>Thus solemnly we are taught in the colleges. And yet, nine out of ten of +the students come from homes where the parents have discovered the +modern practice of birth control; all the students are themselves +finding out about it in one way or another, and will proceed when they +marry to restrict themselves to two or three children. In vain will the +ghost of their favorite statesman and hero, Theodore Roosevelt, be +traveling up and down the land, denouncing them for the dreadful crime +of "race suicide"—that is to say, their presuming to use their reason +to put an end to the ghastly situation revealed by the Malthusian law, +over-population eternally recurring and checked by abortion, war and +famine! In vain will the ghost of their favorite saint and moralist, +Anthony Comstock, be traveling up and down the land, putting people in +jail for daring to teach to poor women what every rich woman knows, and +for attempting to change the entirely man-made state of affairs whereby +an intelligent and self-governing Anglo-Saxon land is being in two or +three generations turned over to a slum population of Italians, Poles, +Hungarians, Portuguese, French-Canadians, Mexicans and Japanese!</p> + +<p>Likewise in every orthodox college the student is taught what his +professors are pleased to call "the law of diminishing returns of +agriculture." That is to say, additional labor expended upon a plot of +land does not result in an equal increase of produce, and the increase +grows less, until finally you come to a time when no matter how much +labor you expend, you can get no more produce from that plot of land. +All professors teach this, because fifty years ago it was true, and +since that time it has not occurred to any professor of political +science to visit a farm. And all the while, out in the suburbs of the +city where the college is located, market gardeners are practicing on an +enormous scale a new system of intensive agriculture which makes the +"law of diminishing returns" a foolish joke.<a name="vol_i_page_026" id="vol_i_page_026"></a></p> + +<p>As Kropotkin shows in his book, "Fields, Factories and Workshops," the +modern intensive gardener, by use of glass and the chemical test-tube, +has developed an entirely new science of plant raising. He is +independent of climate, he makes his own climate; he is independent of +the defects of the soil, he would just as soon start from nothing and +make his soil upon an asphalt pavement. By doubling his capital +investment he raises, not twice as much produce, but ten times as much. +If his methods were applied to the British Isles, he could raise +sufficient produce on this small surface to feed the population of the +entire globe.</p> + +<p>So we see that by simple and entirely harmless devices man is in +position to restrict or to increase population as he sees fit. Also he +is in position to raise food and produce the necessities of life for a +hundred or thousand times as many people as are now on the earth. But +superstition ordains involuntary parenthood, and capitalism ordains that +land shall be held out of use for speculation, or shall be exploited for +rent! And this is done in the name of "nature"—that old nature of the +"tooth and claw," whose ancient plan it is "that they shall take who +have the power, and they shall keep who can"; that ancient nature which +has been so entirely suppressed and supplanted by civilized man, and +which survives only as a ghost, a skeleton to be resurrected from the +tomb, for the purpose of frightening the enslaved. When a predatory +financier wishes a fur overcoat to protect himself from the cold, or +when he hires a masseur to keep up the circulation of his blood, you do +not find him troubling himself about the laws of "nature"; never will he +mention this old scarecrow, except when he is trying to persuade the +workers of the world to go on paying him tribute for the use of the +natural resources of the earth!<a name="vol_i_page_027" id="vol_i_page_027"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI"></a>CHAPTER VI<br /><br /> +MAN THE REBEL</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Shows the transition stage between instinct and reason, in which +man finds himself, and how he can advance to a securer condition.)</p></div> + +<p>In the state of nature you find every creature living a precarious +existence, incessantly beset by enemies; and the creature survives only +so long as it keeps itself at the top of its form. The result is the +maintenance of the type in its full perfection, and, under the +competitive pressure, a gradual increase of its powers. Excepting when +sudden eruptions of natural forces occur, every creature is perfectly +provided with a set of instincts for all emergencies; it is in +harmonious relationship to its environment, it knows how to do what it +has to do, and even its fears and its pains serve for its protection. +But now comes man and overthrows this state of nature, abolishes the +competitive struggle, and changes at his own insolent will both his +environment and his reaction thereto.</p> + +<p>Man's changes are, in the beginning, all along one line; they are for +his own greater comfort, the avoidance of the inconveniences of nature +and the stresses of the competitive struggle. In a state of nature there +are no fat animals, but in civilization there are not merely fat +animals, but fat men to eat the fat animals. In a state of nature no +animal loafs very long; it has to go out and hunt its food again. But +man, by his superior cunning, compels the animals to work for him, and +also his fellow men. So he produces unlimited wealth for himself; not +merely can he eat and drink and sleep all he wants, but he builds a +whole elaborate set of laws and moral customs and religious codes about +this power, he invents manners and customs and literatures and arts, +expressive of his superiority to nature and to his fellow men, and of +his ability to enslave and exploit them. So he destroys for his +imperious self the beneficent guardianship which nature had maintained +over him; he develops a thousand complicated diseases, a thousand +monstrous abnormalities of body and mind and spirit. And each one of +these diseases and abnormalities is a new<a name="vol_i_page_028" id="vol_i_page_028"></a> life of its own; it develops +a body of knowledge, a science, and perhaps an art; it becomes the means +of life, the environment and the determining destiny of thousands, +perhaps millions, of human beings. So continues the growth of the +colossal structure which we call civilization—in part still healthy and +progressive, but in part as foul and deadly as a gigantic cancer.</p> + +<p>What is to be done about this cancer? First of all, it must be +diagnosed, the extent of it precisely mapped out and the causes of it +determined. Man, the rebel, has rejected his mother nature, and has lost +and for the most part forgotten the instincts with which she provided +him. He has destroyed the environment which, however harsh to the +individual, was beneficent to the race, and has set up in the place of +it a gigantic pleasure-house, with talking machines and moving pictures +and soda fountains and manicure parlors and "gents' furnishing +establishments."</p> + +<p>Shall we say that man is to go back to a state of nature, that he shall +no longer make asylums for the insane and homes for the defective, +eye-glasses for the astigmatic and malted milk for the dyspeptic? There +are some who preach that. Among the multitude of strange books and +pamphlets which come in my mail, I found the other day a volume from +England, "Social Chaos and the Way Out," by Alfred Baker Read, a learned +and imposing tome of 364 pages, wherein with all the paraphernalia of +learning it is gravely maintained that the solution for the ills of +civilization is a return to the ancient Greek practice of infanticide. +Every child at birth is to be examined by a committee of physicians, and +if it is found to possess any defect, or if the census has established +that there are enough babies in the world for the present, this baby +shall be mercifully and painlessly asphyxiated. You might think that +this is a joke, after the fashion of Swift's proposal for eating the +children of famine-stricken Ireland. I have spent some time examining +this book before I risk committing myself to the statement that it is +the work of a sober scientist, with no idea whatever of fun.</p> + +<p>If we are going to think clearly on this subject, the first point we +have to understand is that nature has nothing to do with it. We cannot +appeal to nature, because we are many thousands of years beyond her +sway. We left her when the first ape came down from the treetop and +fastened a sharp stone in the end of his club; we bade irrevocable +good-bye<a name="vol_i_page_029" id="vol_i_page_029"></a> to her when the first man kept himself from freezing and +altered his diet by means of fire. Therefore, it is no argument to say +that this, that, or the other remedy is "unnatural." Our choice will lie +among a thousand different courses, but the one thing we may be sure of +is that none of them will be "natural." Bairnsfather, in one of his war +cartoons, portrays a British officer on leave, who got homesick for the +trenches and went out into the garden and dug himself a hole in the mud +and sat shivering in the rain all night. And this amuses us vastly; but +we should be even more amused if any kind of reformer, physician, +moralist, clergyman or legislator should suggest to us any remedy for +our ills that was really "according to nature."</p> + +<p>Civilized man, creature of art and of knowledge, has no love for nature +except as an object for the play of his fancy and his wit. He means to +live his own life, he means to hold himself above nature with all his +powers. Yet, obviously, he cannot go on accumulating diseases, he cannot +give his life-blood to the making of a cancer while his own proper +tissues starve. He must somehow divert the flow of his energies, his +social blood-stream, so to speak, from the cancer to the healthy growth. +To abandon the metaphor, man will determine by the use of his reason +what he wishes life to be; he will choose the highest forms of it to +which he can attain. He will then, by the deliberate act of his own +will, devote his energies to those tasks; he will make for himself new +laws, new moral codes, new customs and ways of thought, calculated to +bring to reality the ideal which he has formed. So only can man justify +himself as a creator, so can he realize the benefit and escape the +penalties of his revolt from his ancient mother.</p> + +<p>And then, perhaps, we shall make the discovery that we have come back to +nature, only in a new form. Nature, harsh and cruel, wasteful and blind +as we call her, yet had her deep wisdom; she cared for the species, she +protected and preserved the type. Man, in his new pride of power, has +invented a philosophy which he dignifies by the name of "individualism." +He lives and works for himself; he chooses to wear silk shirts, and to +break the speed limit, and to pin ribbons and crosses on his chest. Now +what he must do with his new morality, if he wishes to save himself from +degeneration, is to manifest the wisdom and far vision of the old<a name="vol_i_page_030" id="vol_i_page_030"></a> +mother whom he spurned, and to say to himself, deliberately, as an act +of high daring: I will protect the species, I will preserve the type! I +will deny myself the raptures of alcoholic intoxication, because it +damages the health of my offspring; I will deny myself the amusement of +sexual promiscuity for the same reason. I will devise imitations of the +chase and of battle in order that I may keep my physical body up to the +best standard of nature. Because I understand that all civilized life is +based upon intelligence, I will acquire knowledge and spread it among my +fellow men. Because I perceive that civilization is impossible without +sympathy, and because sympathy makes it impossible for me to be happy +while my fellow men are ignorant and degraded, therefore I dedicate my +energies to the extermination of poverty, war, parasitism and all forms +of exploitation of man by his fellows.</p> + +<p>Professor William James is the author of an excellent essay entitled "A +Moral Equivalent for War." He sets forth the idea that men have loved +war through the ages because it has called forth their highest efforts, +has made them more fully aware of the powers of their being. He asks, +May it not be possible for man, of his own free impulse, born of his +love of life and the wonderful potentialities which it unfolds, to +invent for himself a discipline, a code based, not upon the destruction +of other men and their enslavement, but upon cooperative emulation in +the unfoldment of the powers of the mind? That this can be done by men, +I have never doubted. That it will be done, and done quickly, has been +made certain by the late world conflict, which has demonstrated to all +thinking people that the progress of the mechanical arts has been such +that man is now able to inflict upon his own civilization more damage +than it is able to endure.<a name="vol_i_page_031" id="vol_i_page_031"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VII" id="CHAPTER_VII"></a>CHAPTER VII<br /><br /> +MAKING OUR MORALS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Attempts to show that human morality must change to fit human +facts, and there can be no judge of it save human reason.)</p></div> + +<p>Assuming the argument of the preceding chapters to be accepted, it +appears that human life is in part at least a product of human will, +guided by human intelligence. Man finds himself in the position of the +crew of a ship in the middle of the ocean; he does not know exactly how +the ship was made, or how it came to be in its present position, but he +has discovered how the engines are run, and how the ship is steered, and +the meaning of the compass. So now he takes charge of the ship, and +keeps it afloat amid many perils; and meantime, on the bridge of the +vessel, there goes on a furious argument over the question what port the +ship shall be steered to and what chart shall be used.</p> + +<p>It is not well as a rule to trust to similes, but this simile is useful +because it helps us to realize how fluid and changeable are the +conditions of man's life, and how incessant and urgent the problems with +which he finds himself confronted. The moral and legal codes of mankind +may be compared to the steering orders which are given to the helmsman +of the vessel. Northeast by north, he is told; and if during the night a +heavy wind arises, and pushes the bow of the vessel off to starboard, +then the helmsman has to push the wheel in the opposite direction. If he +does not do so, he may find that his vessel has swung around and is +going to some other part of the world. Next morning the passengers may +wake up and find the ship on the rocks—because the helmsman persisted +in following certain steering directions which were laid down in an +ancient Hebrew book two or three thousand years ago!</p> + +<p>If life is a continually changing product, then the laws which govern +conduct must also be continually changing, and morality is a problem of +continuous adjustment to new circumstances and new needs. If man is free +to work upon this changing environment, he must be free to make new +tools and devise new processes. If it is the task of reason to choose<a name="vol_i_page_032" id="vol_i_page_032"></a> +among many possible courses and many possible varieties of life, then +clearly it is man's duty to examine and revise every detail of his laws +and customs and moral codes.</p> + +<p>This is, of course, in flat contradiction to the teachings of all +religions. So far as I know there is no religion which does not teach +that the conduct of man in certain matters has been eternally fixed by +some higher power, and that it is man's duty to conform to these rules. +It is considered to be wicked even to suggest any other idea; in fact, +to do so is the most wicked thing in the world, far more dangerous than +any actual infraction of the code, whatever it may be.</p> + +<p>Let us see how this works out in practice. Let us take, for a test, the +Ten Commandments. These commandments were graven upon stone tablets some +four thousand years ago, and are supposed to have been valid ever since. +"Thou shalt not kill," is one; others phrase it, "Thou shall do no +murder"; and in this double version we see at once the beginnings of +controversy. If you are a Quaker, you accept the former version, while +if you are a member of the military general staff of your country you +accept the latter. You maintain the right to kill your fellow men, +provided that those who do the killing have been previously clad in a +special uniform, indicating their distinctive function as killers of +their fellow men. You maintain, in other words, the right of making war; +and presently, when you get into making war, you find yourself +maintaining the right to kill, not merely by the old established method +of the sword and the bullet, but by means of poison gases which destroy +the lives of women and children, perhaps a whole city full at a time.</p> + +<p>And also, of course, you maintain the right to kill, provided the +killing has been formally ordered and sanctioned by a man who sits upon +a raised bench and wears a black robe, and perhaps a powdered wig. You +consider that by the simple device of putting this man into a black robe +and a powdered wig, you endow him with authority to judge and revise the +divine law. In other words, you subject this divine law to human reason; +and if some religious fanatic refuses to be so subjected, you call him +by the dread name "pacifist," and if he attempts to preach his idea, you +send him to prison for ten or twenty years, which means in actual +practice that you kill him by the slow effects of malnutrition and +tubercular infection. If he is ordered to put on the special costume of<a name="vol_i_page_033" id="vol_i_page_033"></a> +killing, and refuses to do so, you call him a "C. O.," and you bully and +beat him, and perhaps administer to him the "water cure" in your +dungeons.</p> + +<p>Or take the commandment that we shall not commit adultery. Surely this +is a law about which we can agree! But presently we discover that +unhappily married couples desire to part, and that if we do not allow +them to part, we actually cause the commission of a great deal more +adultery than otherwise. Therefore, our wise men meet together, and +revise this divine law, and decide that it is not adultery if a man +takes another wife, provided he has received from a judge an engraved +piece of paper permitting him to do so. But some of the followers of +religion refuse to admit this right of mere mortal man. The Catholic +Church attempts to enforce its own laws, and declares that people who +divorce and remarry are really living in adultery and committing mortal +sin. The Episcopal Church does not go quite so far as that; it allows +the innocent party in the divorce to remarry. Other churches are content +to accept the state law as it stands. Is it not manifest that all these +groups are applying human reason, and nothing but human reason, to the +interpreting and revising of their divine commandments?</p> + +<p>Or take the law, "Thou shalt not steal." Surely we can all agree upon +that! Let us do so; but our agreement gets us nowhere, because we have +to set up a human court to decide what is "stealing." Is it stealing to +seize upon land, and kill the occupants of it, and take the land for +your own, and hand it down to your children forever? Yes, of course, +that is stealing, you say; but at once you have to revise your +statement. It is not stealing if it was done a sufficient number of +years ago; in that case the results of it are sanctified by law, and +held unchangeable forever. Also, we run up against the fact that it is +not stealing, if it is done by the State, by men who have been dressed +up in the costume of killers before they commit the act.</p> + +<p>Again, is it stealing to hold land out of use for speculation, while +other men are starving and dying for lack of land to labor upon? Some of +us call this stealing, but we are impolitely referred to as "radicals," +and if we venture to suggest that anyone should resist this kind of +stealing, we are sentenced to slow death from malnutrition and +tubercular infection. Again, is it stealing for a victim of our system +of land<a name="vol_i_page_034" id="vol_i_page_034"></a> monopoly to take a loaf of bread in order to save the life of +his starving child? The law says that this is stealing, and sends the +man to jail for this act; yet the common sense of mankind protests, and +I have heard a great many respectable Americans venture so far in +"radicalism" as to say that they themselves would steal under such +circumstances.</p> + +<p>One could pile up illustrations without limit; but this is enough to +make clear the point, that it is perfectly futile to attempt to talk +about "divine" rules for human conduct. Regardless of any ideas you may +hold, or any wishes, you are forced at every hour of your life to apply +your reason to the problems of your life, and you have no escape from +the task of judging and deciding. All that you do is to judge right or +to judge wrong; and if you judge wrong, you inflict misery upon yourself +and upon all who come into contact with you. How much more sensible, +therefore, to recognize the fact of moral and intellectual +responsibility; to investigate the data of life with which you have to +deal, the environment by which you are surrounded, and to train your +judgment so that you will be able to fit yourself to it with quickness +and certainty!</p> + +<p>"But," the believer in religion will say, "this leaves mankind without +any guide or authority. How can human beings act, how can they deal with +one another, if there are no laws, no permanent moral codes?"</p> + +<p>The answer is that to accept the idea of the evolution of morality does +not mean at all that there will be no permanent laws and working +principles. Many of the facts of life are fixed for all practical +purposes—the purposes not merely of your life and my life, but the life +of many generations. We are not likely to see in our time the end of the +ancient Hebrew announcement that "the sins of the father are visited +upon the children"; therefore it is possible for us to study out a +course of action based upon the duty of every father to hand down to his +children the gift of a sound mind in a sound body. The Catholic Church +has had for a thousand years or more the "mortal sin" of gluttony upon +its list; and today comes experimental science with its new weapons of +research, and discovers autointoxication and the hardening of the +arteries, and makes it very unlikely that the moral codes of men will +ever fail to list gluttony as a mortal sin. Indeed, science has added to +gluttony, not merely drunkenness, but all use of alcoholic liquor for +beverage purposes; we have done this in<a name="vol_i_page_035" id="vol_i_page_035"></a> spite of the manifest fact that +the drinking of wine was not merely an Old Testament virtue, but a New +Testament religious rite.</p> + +<p>To say that human life changes, and that new discoveries and new powers +make necessary new laws and moral customs, is to say something so +obvious that it might seem a waste of paper and ink. Man has invented +the automobile and has crowded himself into cities, and so has to adopt +a rigid set of traffic regulations. So far as I know, it has never +occurred to any religious enthusiast to seek in the book of Revelation +for information as to the advisability of the "left hand turn" at +Broadway and Forty-second Street, New York, at five o'clock in the +afternoon. But modern science has created new economic facts, just as +unprecedented as the automobile; it has created new possibilities of +spending and new possibilities of starving for mankind; it has made new +cravings and new satisfactions, new crimes and new virtues; and yet the +great mass of our people are still seeking to guide themselves in their +readjustments to these new facts by ancient codes which have no more +relationship to these facts than they have to the affairs of Mars!</p> + +<p>I am acquainted with a certain lady, one of the kindest and most devoted +souls alive, who seeks to solve the problems of her life, and of her +large family of children and grand-children, according to sentences +which she picks out, more or less at random, from certain more or less +random chapters of ancient Hebrew literature. This lady will find some +words which she imagines apply to the matter, and will shut her devout +eyes to the fact that there are other "texts," bearing on the matter, +which say exactly the opposite. She will place the strangest and most +unimaginable interpretations upon the words, and yet will be absolutely +certain that her interpretation is the voice of God speaking directly to +her. If you try to tell her about Socialism, she will say, "The poor ye +have always with you"; which means that it is interfering with Divine +Providence to try to remedy poverty on any large scale. This lady is +ready instantly to relieve any single case of want; she regards it as +her duty to do this; in fact, she considers that the purpose of some +people's poverty is to provide her with a chance to do the noble action +of relieving it. You would think that the meaning of the sentence, +"Spare the rod and spoil the child," would be so plain that no one<a name="vol_i_page_036" id="vol_i_page_036"></a> +could mistake it; but this good lady understood it to mean that God +forbade the physical chastisement of children, and preferred them +"spoiled." She held this idea for half a lifetime—until it was pointed +out to her that the sentence was not in the Bible, but in "Hudibras," an +old English poem!<a name="vol_i_page_037" id="vol_i_page_037"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VIII" id="CHAPTER_VIII"></a>CHAPTER VIII<br /><br /> +THE VIRTUE OF MODERATION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Attempts to show that wise conduct is an adjustment of means to +ends, and depends upon the understanding of a particular set of +circumstances.)</p></div> + +<p>Some years ago I used to know an ardent single tax propagandist who +found my way of arguing intensely irritating, because, as he phrased it, +I had "no principles." We would be discussing, for example, a protective +tariff, and I would wish to collect statistics, but discovered to my +bewilderment that to my single tax friend a customs duty was "stealing" +on the part of the government. The government had a right to tax land, +because that was the gift of nature, but it had no right to tax the +products of human labor, and when it took a portion of the goods which +anyone brought into a country, the government was playing the part of a +robber. Of course such a man was annoyed by the suggestion that in the +early stages of a country's development it might possibly be a good +thing for the country to make itself independent and self-sufficient by +encouraging the development of its manufactures; that, on the other +hand, when these manufactures had grown to such a size that they +controlled the government, it might be an excellent thing for the +country to subject them to the pressure of foreign competition, in order +to lower their value as a preliminary to socializing them.</p> + +<p>The reader who comes to this book looking for hard and fast rules of +life will be disappointed. It would be convenient if someone could lay +down for us a moral code, and lift from our shoulders the inconvenient +responsibility of deciding about our own lives. There may be persons so +weak that they have to have the conditions of their lives thus +determined for them; but I am not writing for such persons. I am writing +for adult and responsible individuals, and I bear in mind that every +individual is a separate problem, with separate needs and separate +duties. There are, of course, a good many rules that apply to everybody +in almost all emergencies, but I cannot think of a single rule that I +would be willing to say I would<a name="vol_i_page_038" id="vol_i_page_038"></a> apply in my life without a single +exception. "Thou shalt not kill" is a rule that I have followed, so far +without exception; but as soon as I turn my imagination loose, I can +think of many circumstances under which I should kill. I remember +discussing the matter with a pacifist friend of mine, an out-and-out +religious non-resistant. I pointed out to him that people sometimes went +insane, and in that condition they sometimes seized hatchets and killed +anyone in sight. What would my pacifist friend do if he saw a maniac +attacking his children with a hatchet? It did not help him to say that +he would use all possible means short of killing the maniac; he had +finally to admit that if he were quite sure it was a question of the +life of the maniac or the life of his child, he would kill. And this is +not mere verbal quibbling, because such things do happen in the world, +and people are confronted with such emergencies, and they have to +decide, and no rule is a general rule if it has a single exception. +There is a saying that "the exception proves the rule," but this is very +silly; it is a mistranslation of the Latin word "probat," which means, +not proves, but tests. No exception can prove a rule. What the exception +does is to test the rule by showing that the result does not follow in +the exceptional case.</p> + +<p>The only kind of rule which can be laid down for human conduct is a rule +in such general terms that it escapes exceptions by leaving the matter +open for every man's difference of opinion. Any kind of rule which is +specific will sooner or later pass out of date. Take, by way of +illustration, the ancient and well-established virtue of frugality. +Obviously, under a state of nature, or of economic competition, it is +necessary for every man to lay by a store "for a rainy day." But suppose +we could set up a condition of economic security, under which society +guaranteed to every man the full product of his labor, and the old and +the sick were fully taken care of—then how foolish a man would seem who +troubled to acquire a surplus of goods! It would be as if we saw him +riding on horseback through the main street of our town in a full suit +of armor!</p> + +<p>I devote a good deal of space to this question of a fixed and +unchangeable morality, because it is one of the heaviest burdens that +mankind carries upon its back. The record of human history is sickening, +not so much because of blood and slaughter, but because of fanaticism; +because wherever the<a name="vol_i_page_039" id="vol_i_page_039"></a> mind of man attempts to assert itself, to escape +from the blind rule of animal greed, it adopts a set of formulas, and +proceeds to enforce them, regardless of consequences, upon the whole of +life. Consider, for example, the rule of the Puritans in England. The +Puritans glorified conscience, and it is perfectly proper to glorify +conscience, but not to the entire suppression of the beauty-making +faculties in man. Macaulay summed up the Puritan point of view in the +sentence that they objected to bear-baiting, not because it gave pain to +the bear, but because it gave pleasure to the spectators. As a result of +applying that principle, and lacing mankind in a straight-jacket by +legislation, England swung back into a reaction under the Cavaliers, in +which debauchery held more complete sway than ever before or since in +English life.</p> + +<p>This is a hard lesson, but it must be learned: there is no virtue that +does not become a vice if it is carried to extremes; there is no virtue +that does not become a vice if it is applied at the wrong time, or under +the wrong circumstances, or at the wrong stage of human development. In +fact, we may say that most vices are virtues misapplied. The so-called +natural vices are simply natural impulses carried to excess, while the +unnatural vices result from the suppression and distortion of natural +impulses. The Greeks had as their supreme virtue what they called +"sophrosuné." It is a beautiful word, worth remembering; it means a +beautiful quality called moderation. We shall find, as we come to +investigate, that life is a series of compromises among many different +needs, many different desires, many different duties; and reason sits as +a wise and patient judge, and appoints to each its proper portion, and +denies to it an excess which would starve the others. Such is true +morality, and it is incompatible with the existence of any fixed code, +whether of human origin or divine.</p> + +<p>The fixed morality is a survival of a far-off past, of the days of +instinct and servitude. Human reason has developed but slowly, and +perhaps only a few people are as yet entirely capable of taking control +of their own destiny; perhaps it is really dangerous to think for +oneself! But if we investigate carefully, we may decide that the danger +is not so much to ourselves as it is to others. The most evil of all the +habits that man has inherited from his far-off past is the habit of +exploiting his fellows, and in order to exploit them more<a name="vol_i_page_040" id="vol_i_page_040"></a> safely the +ruling castes of priests and kings and nobles and property owners have +taken possession of the moralities of the world and shaped them for +their own convenience. They have taught the slave virtues of credulity +and submission; they have surrounded their teachings with all the +terrors of the supernatural; they have placed upon rebellion the +penalties, not merely of this world, but of the next, not merely of the +dungeon and the rack, but of hellfire and brimstone.</p> + +<p>I do not wish to go to extremes and say that the moral codes now taught +in the world are made wholly in this evil way. As a matter of fact they +are a queer jumble of the two elements, the slave terrors of the past +and the common sense of the present. There is not one moral code in the +world today, there are many. There is one for the rich, and an entirely +different one for the poor, and the rich have had a great deal more to +do with shaping the code of the poor than the poor have had to do with +shaping the code of the rich. There is one code for governments, and an +entirely different one for the victims of governments. There is one code +for business, and an entirely different one, a far more human and decent +one, for friendship. Above all, there is one code for Sunday and another +code for the other six days of the week. Most of our idealisms and our +sentimental fine phrases we reserve for our Sunday code, while for our +every-day code we go back to the rule of the jungle: "Dog eat dog," or +"Do unto others as they would do unto you, but do it first." When you +attempt to suggest a new moral code to our present day moral +authorities, it is the fine phrases of the Sunday code they bring out +for exhibition purposes; and perhaps you are impressed by their +arguments—until Monday morning, when you attempt to apply this code at +the office, and they stare at you in bewilderment, or burst out laughing +in your face.</p> + +<p>What I am trying to do here is to outline a code that will not be a +matter of phrases but a matter of practice. It will apply to all men, +rich as well as poor, and to all seven days of the week. I am not so +much suggesting a code, as pointing out to you how you can work out your +own code for yourself. I am suggesting that you should adopt it, not +because I tell you to, but because you yourself have taken it and tested +it, precisely as you would test any other of the practical affairs of +your life—potatoes as an article of diet, or some particular sack of +potatoes that a peddler was trying to sell to you. It is<a name="vol_i_page_041" id="vol_i_page_041"></a> not yet +possible for you to be as sure about everything in your life as you can +be about a sack of potatoes; human knowledge has not got that far; but +at least you can know what is to be known, and if anything is a matter +of uncertainty, you can know that. Such knowledge is often the most +important of all—just as the driver of an automobile wants to know if a +bridge is not to be depended on.</p> + +<p>So I say to you that if you want to find happiness in this life, look +with distrust upon all absolutes and ultimates, all hard and fast rules, +all formulas and dogmas and "general principles." Bear in mind that +there are many factors in every case, there are many complications in +every human being, there are many sides to every question. Try to keep +an open mind and an even temper. Try to take an interest in learning +something new every day, and in trying some new experiment. This is the +scientific attitude toward life; this is the way of growth and of true +success. It is inconvenient, because it involves working your brains, +and most people have not been taught to do this, and find it the hardest +kind of work there is. But how much better it is to think for yourself, +and to protect yourself, than to trust your thinking to some group of +people whose only interest may be to exploit you for their advantage!<a name="vol_i_page_042" id="vol_i_page_042"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IX" id="CHAPTER_IX"></a>CHAPTER IX<br /><br /> +THE CHOOSING OF LIFE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the standards by which we may judge what is best in +life, and decide what we wish to make of it.)</p></div> + +<p>We have made the point about evolution, that it may go forward or it may +go backward. There is no guarantee in nature that because a thing +changes, it must necessarily become better than it was. On the contrary, +degeneration is as definitely established a fact as growth, and it is of +the utmost importance, in studying the problem of human happiness and +how to make it, to get clear the fact that nature has produced, and +continues to produce, all kinds of monstrosities and parasites and +failures and abortions. And all these blunders of our great mother +struggle just as hard, desire life just as ardently as normal creatures, +and suffer just as cruelly when they fail. Blind optimism about life is +just as fatuous and just as dangerous as blind pessimism, and if we +propose to take charge of life, and to make it over, we shall find that +we have to get quickly to the task of deciding what our purpose is.</p> + +<p>"Choose well, your choice is brief and yet endless," says Carlyle. You +are driven in your choice by two facts—first, that you have to choose, +regardless of whether you want to or not; and second, that upon your +choice depend infinite possibilities of happiness or of misery. The +interdependence of life is such that you are choosing not merely for the +present, but for the future; you are choosing for your posterity +forever, and to some extent you are choosing for all mankind. Matthew +Arnold has said that "Conduct is three-fourths of life"; but I, for my +part, have never been able to see where he got his figures. It seems to +me that conduct is practically everything in life that really counts. +Conduct is not merely marriage and birth and premature death; it is not +merely eating and drinking and sleeping: it is thinking and aspiring; it +is religion and science, music and literature and art. It is not yet the +lightning and the cyclone, but with the spread of knowledge it is coming +to be these things, and I suspect that some day it may be even the comet +and the rising of the sun.<a name="vol_i_page_043" id="vol_i_page_043"></a></p> + +<p>We are now going to apply our reason to this enormous problem of human +conduct; we are going to ask ourselves the question: What kind of life +do we want? What kind of life are we going to make? What are the +standards by which we may know excellence in life, and distinguish it +from failure and waste and blunder in life? Obviously, when we have done +this, we shall have solved the moral problem; all we shall have to say +is, act so that your actions help to bring the desirable things into +being, and do not act so as to hinder or weaken them.</p> + +<p>We shall not be able to go to nature to settle this question for us. +This is our problem, not nature's. But we shall find, as usual, that we +can pick up precious hints from her; we shall be wise to study her ways, +and learn from her successes and her failures. We are proud of her +latest product, ourselves. Let us see how she made us; what were the +stages on the way to man?</p> + +<p>First in the scale of evolution, it appears, came inert matter. We call +it inert, because it looks that way, though we know, of course, that it +consists of infinite numbers of molecules vibrating with speed which we +can measure even though we cannot imagine it. This "matter" is +enormously fascinating, and a wise man will hesitate to speak +patronizingly about it. Nevertheless, considering matter apart from the +mind which studies it, we decide that it represents a low stage of +being. We speak contemptuously of stones and clods and lumps of clay. We +award more respect to things like mountains and tempest-tossed oceans, +because they are big; in the early days of our race we used to worship +these things, but now we think of them merely as the raw material of +life, and we should not be in the least interested in becoming a +mountain or an ocean.</p> + +<p>Almost everyone would agree, therefore, that what we call "life" is a +higher and more important achievement of nature. And if we wish to grade +this life, we do so according to its sentience—that is to say, the +amount and intensity of the consciousness which grows in it. We are +interested in the one-celled organisms which swarm everywhere throughout +nature, and we study the mysterious processes by which they nourish and +beget themselves; we suspect that they have a germ of consciousness in +them; but we are surer of the meaning and importance of the +consciousness we detect in<a name="vol_i_page_044" id="vol_i_page_044"></a> some complex organism like a fish or bird. +We learn to know the signs of consciousness, of dawning intelligence, +and we esteem the various kinds of creatures according to the amount of +it they possess. We reject mere physical bigness and mere strength. +Joyce Kilmer may write:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">"Poems are made by men like me,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: .25em;">But only God can make a tree"—</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>And that seems to us a charming bit of fancy; but the common sense of +the thing is voiced to us much better in the lines of old Ben Jonson:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">"It is not growing like a tree</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: .25em;">In bulk doth make man better be."</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>If we take two animals of equal bulk, the hippopotamus and the elephant, +we shall be far more interested in the elephant, because of the +intelligence and what we call "character" which he displays. There are +good elephants and bad elephants, kind ones and treacherous ones. We +love the dog because we can make a companion of him; that is, because we +can teach him to react to human stimuli. Of all animals we are +fascinated most by the monkey, because he is nearest to man, and +displays the keenest intelligence.</p> + +<p>Someone may say that this is all mere human egotism, and that we have no +way of really being sure that the life of elephants and hippopotami is +not more interesting and significant than the life of men. Never having +been either of these animals, I cannot say with assurance; but I know +that I have the power to exterminate these creatures, or to pen them in +cages, and they are helpless to protect themselves, or even to +understand what is happening to them. So I am irresistibly driven to +conclude that intelligence is more safe and more worth while than +unintelligence; in short, that intelligence is nature's highest product +up to date, and that to foster and develop it is the best guess I can +make as to the path of wisdom—that is, of intelligence!</p> + +<p>When we come to deal with human values, we find that we can trace much +the same kind of evolution. Back in the days of the cave man, it was +physical strength which dominated the horde; but nowadays, except in the +imagination of the small boy, the "strong man" does not cut much of a +figure.<a name="vol_i_page_045" id="vol_i_page_045"></a> We go once, perhaps, to see him lift his heavy weights and +break his iron bars, but then we are tired of him. Mere strength had to +yield in the struggle for life to quickness of eye and hand, to energy +which for lack of a better name we may call "nervous." The pugilist who +has nothing but muscle goes down before his lighter antagonist who can +keep out of his reach, and the crowd loves the football hero who can +duck and dodge and make the long runs. One might cite a thousand +illustrations, such as the British bowmen breaking down the heavily +armored knights, or the quick-moving, light vessels of Britain +overcoming the huge galleons of Spain. And as society develops and +becomes more complex, the fighting man becomes less and less a man of +muscle, and more and more a man of "nerve." Alexander, Cæsar and +Napoleon would have stood a poor chance in personal combat against many +of their followers. They led, because they were men of energy and +cunning, able to maintain the subtle thing we call prestige.</p> + +<p>Now the world has moved into an industrial era, and who are the great +men of our time, the men whose lightest words are heeded, whose doings +are spread upon the front pages of our newspapers? Obviously, they are +the men of money. We may pretend to ourselves that we do not really +stand in awe of a Morgan or a Rockefeller, but that we admire, let us +say, an Edison or a Roosevelt. But Edison himself is a man of money, and +will tell you that he had to be a man of money in order to be free to +conduct his experiments. As for our politicians and statesmen, they +either serve the men of money, or the men of money suppress them, as +they did Roosevelt. The Morgans and the Rockefellers do not do much +talking; they do not have to. They content themselves with being obeyed, +and the shaping of our society is in their hands.</p> + +<p>And yet, some of us really believe that there are higher faculties in +man than the ability to manipulate the stock market. We consider that +the great inventor, the great poet, the great moralist, contributes more +to human happiness than the man who, by cunning and persistence, +succeeds in monopolizing some material necessity of human life. "Poets," +says Shelley, "are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind." If this +strange statement is anywhere near to truth, it is surely of importance +that we should decide what are the higher powers in men, and how they +may be recognized, and how fostered and developed.<a name="vol_i_page_046" id="vol_i_page_046"></a></p> + +<p>What is, in its essence, the process of evolution from the lower to the +higher forms of mental life? It is a process of expanding consciousness; +the developing of ability to apprehend a wider and wider circle of +existence, to share it, to struggle for it as we do for the life we call +our "own." The test of the higher mental forms is therefore a test of +universality, of sympathetic inclusiveness; or, to use commoner words, +it is a test of enlightened unselfishness.</p> + +<p>Every human individual has the will to life, the instinct of +self-preservation, which persuades him that he is of importance; but the +test of his development is his ability to realize that, important though +he may be, he is but a small part of the universe, and his highest +interests are not in himself alone, his highest duties are not owed to +himself alone. And as the life becomes more of the intellect, this fact +becomes more and more obvious, more and more dominating. Men who +monopolize the material things of the world and their control are +necessarily self-seeking; but in the realm of the higher faculties this +element, in the very nature of the case, is forced into the background. +It is evident that truth is not truth for the Standard Oil Company, nor +for J. P. Morgan and Company, nor yet for the government of the United +States; it is truth for the whole of mankind, and one who sincerely +labors for the truth does so for the universal benefit.</p> + +<p>There may be, of course, an element of selfishness in the activities of +poets and inventors. They may be seeking for fame; they may be hoping to +make money out of their discoveries; but the greatest men we know have +been dominated by an overwhelming impulse of creation, and when we read +their lives, and discover in them signs of petty vanity or jealousy or +greed, we are pained and shocked. What touches us most deeply is some +mark of self-consecration and humility; as, for example, when Newton +tells us that after all his life's labors he felt himself as a little +child gathering sea-shells on the shore of the great ocean of truth; or +when Alfred Russel Wallace, discovering that Darwin had been working +longer than himself over the theory of the origin of species, generously +withdrew and permitted the theory to go to the world in Darwin's name.</p> + +<p>There are three faculties in man, usually described as intellect, +feeling and will. According as one or the other faculty<a name="vol_i_page_047" id="vol_i_page_047"></a> predominates, +we have a great scientist, a great poet, or a great moralist. We might +choose a representative of each type—let us say Newton, Shakespeare and +Jesus—and spend much time in controversy as to which of the three types +is the greatest, which makes the greatest contribution to human +happiness. But it will suffice here to point out that the three +faculties do not exclude one another; every man must have all three, and +a perfectly rounded man should seek to develop all three. Jesus was +considerable of a poet, and we should pay far less heed to Shakespeare +if he had not been a moralist. Also there have been instances of great +poets and painters who were scientists—for example, Leonardo and +Goethe.</p> + +<p>The fundamental difference between the scientist and the poet is that +one is exploring nature and discovering things which actually exist, +whereas the other is creating new life out of his own spirit. But the +poet will find that his creations take but little hold upon life, if +they are not guided and shaped by a deep understanding of life's +fundamental nature and needs—in other words, if the poet is not +something of a scientist. And in the same way, the very greatest +discoveries of science seem to us like leaps of creative imagination; as +if the mind had completed nature, through some intuitive and sympathetic +understanding of what nature wished to be.</p> + +<p>The point about these higher forms of human activity is that they renew +and multiply life. We may say that if Jesus had never lived, others +would have embodied and set forth with equal poignancy the revolutionary +idea of the equality of all men as children of one common father. And +perhaps this is true; but we have no way of being sure that it is true, +and as we look back upon the last nineteen hundred years of human +history, we are unable to imagine just what the life of mankind during +those centuries would have been if Jesus had died when he was a baby. We +do not know what modern thought might have been without Kant, or what +modern music might have been without Beethoven. We are forced to admit +that if it had not been for the patient wisdom and persuasive kindness +of Lincoln, the Slave Power might have won its independence, and America +today might have been a military camp like Europe, and the lives and +thoughts of every one of us would have been different.</p> + +<p>Or take the activities of the poet. Many years ago the writer was asked +to name the men who had exercised<a name="vol_i_page_048" id="vol_i_page_048"></a> the greatest influence upon him, and +after much thought he named three: Jesus, Hamlet and Shelley. And now +consider the significance of this reply. One of these people, Shelley, +was what we call a "real" person; that is, a man who actually lived and +walked upon the earth. Concerning Hamlet, it is believed there was once +a Prince of Denmark by that name, but the character who is known to us +as Hamlet is the creation of a poet's brain. As to the third figure, +Jesus, the authorities dispute. Some say that he was a man who actually +lived; others believe that he was God on earth; yet others, very +learned, maintain that he is a legendary name around which a number of +traditions have gathered.</p> + +<p>To me it does not make a particle of difference which of the three +possibilities happens to be true about Jesus. If he was God on earth, he +was God in human form, under human limitations, and in that sense we are +all gods on earth. And whether he really lived, or whether some poet +invented him, matters not a particle so far as concerns his effect upon +others. The emotions which moved him, the loves, the griefs, the high +resolves, existed in the soul of someone, whether his name were Jesus or +John; and these emotions have been recorded in such form that they +communicate themselves to us, they become a part of our souls, they make +us something different from what we were before we encountered them.</p> + +<p>In other words, the poet makes in his own soul a new life, and then +projects it into the world, and it becomes a force which makes over the +lives of millions of other people. If you read the vast mass of +criticism which has grown up about the figure of Hamlet, you learn that +Hamlet is the type of the "modern man." Shakespeare was able to divine +what the modern man would be; or perhaps we can go farther and say that +Shakespeare helped to make the modern man what he is; the modern man is +more of Hamlet, because he has taken Hamlet to his heart and pondered +over Hamlet's problem. Or take Don Quixote. No doubt the follies of the +"age of chivalry" would have died out of men's hearts in the end; but +how much sooner they died because of the laughter of Cervantes! Or take +"Les Miserables." Our prison system is not ideal by any means, but it is +far less cruel than it was half a century ago, and we owe this in part +to Victor Hugo. Every convict in the world is to some degree a happier +man because of this vision which was projected upon the world<a name="vol_i_page_049" id="vol_i_page_049"></a> from the +soul of one great poet. No one can estimate the part which the writings +of Tolstoi have played in the present revolution in Russia, but this we +may say with certainty: there is not one man, woman or child in Russia +at the present moment who is quite the same as he would have been if +"Resurrection" had never been written.</p> + +<p>In discussing the highest faculties of man we have so far refrained from +using the word "genius." It is a word which has been cheapened by +misuse, but we are now in position to use it. The things which we have +just been considering are the phenomena of genius—and we can say this, +even though we may not know exactly what genius is. Perhaps it is, as +Frederic Myers asserts, a "subliminal uprush," the welling up into the +consciousness of some part of the content of the subconscious mind. Or +perhaps it is something of what man calls "divine." Or perhaps it is the +first dawning, the first hint of that super-race which will some day +replace mankind. Perhaps we are witnessing the same thing that happened +on the earth when glimmerings of reason first broke upon the mind of +some poor, bewildered ape. We cannot be sure; but this much we can say: +the man of genius represents the highest activity of the mind of which +we as yet have knowledge. He represents the spirit of man, fully +emancipated, fully conscious, and taking up the task of creation; taking +human life as raw material, and making it over into something more +subtle, more intense, more significant, more universal than it ever was +before, or ever would have been without the intervention of this new +God-man.<a name="vol_i_page_050" id="vol_i_page_050"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_X" id="CHAPTER_X"></a>CHAPTER X<br /><br /> +MYSELF AND MY NEIGHBOR</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Compares the new morality with the old, and discusses the relative +importance of our various duties.)</p></div> + +<p>So now we may say that we know what are the great and important things +in life. Slowly and patiently, with infinite distress and waste and +failure, but yet inevitably, the life of man is being made over and +multiplied to infinity, by the power of the thinking mind, impelled by +the joy and thrill of the creative action, and guided by the sense of +responsibility, the instinct to serve, which we call conscience. To +develop these higher faculties is the task we have before us, and the +supreme act to which we dedicate ourselves.</p> + +<p>So now we are in position to define the word moral. Assuming that our +argument be accepted, that action is moral which tends to foster the +best and highest forms of life we know, and to aid them in developing +their highest powers; that is immoral which tends to destroy the best +life we know, or to hinder its rapid development.</p> + +<p>Let us now proceed to apply these tests to the practices of man; first +as an individual, and then as a social being. What are my duties to +myself, and what are my duties to the world about me?</p> + +<p>You will note that these questions differ somewhat from those of the old +morality. Jesus told us, first, that we should love the Lord our God, +and, second, that we should love our neighbor as ourself. Some would say +that modern thought has dismissed God from consideration; but I would +prefer to say that modern thought has decided that the place where we +encounter God most immediately is in our own miraculously expanding +consciousness. Our duty toward God is our duty to make of ourselves the +most perfect product of the Divine Incarnation that we can become. Our +duty to our neighbor is to help him to do the same.</p> + +<p>Of course, as we come to apply these formulas, we find that they overlap +and mingle inextricably; the two duties are really one duty looked at +from different points of view. We<a name="vol_i_page_051" id="vol_i_page_051"></a> decide that we owe it to ourselves to +develop our best powers of thinking, and we discover that in so doing we +make ourselves better fitted to live as citizens, better equipped to +help our fellow men. We go out into our city to serve others by making +the city clean and decent, and we find that we have helped to save +ourselves from a pestilence.</p> + +<p>The most commonly accepted, or at any rate the most commonly preached, +of all formulas is the "golden rule," "Do unto others as you would have +them do unto you." This formula is good so far as it goes, but you note +that it leaves undetermined the all-important question, what <i>ought</i> we +to want others to do unto us. If I am an untrained child, what I would +have others do unto me is to give me plenty of candy; therefore, under +the golden rule, my highest duty becomes to distribute free candy to the +world. The "golden rule" is obviously consistent with all forms of +self-indulgence, and with all forms of stagnation; it might result in a +civilization more static than China.</p> + +<p>Or let us take the formula which the German philosopher Kant worked out +as the final product of his thinking: "Act so that you would be willing +for your action to become a general rule of conduct." Here again is the +same problem. There are many possible general rules of conduct. Some +would prefer one, some others; and there is no possible way of escape +from the fact that before men can agree what to do, they must decide +what they wish to make of their lives.</p> + +<p>To the formula of Jesus, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself," the +answer is obvious enough: "Suppose my neighbor is not worthy of as much +love as myself?" To be sure, it is a perilous thing for me to have to +decide this question; nevertheless, it may be a fact that I am a great +inventor, and that my neighbor is a sexual pervert. There is, of course, +a sense in which I may love him, even so; I may love the deeper +possibilities of his nature, which religious ecstasy can appeal to and +arouse. But in spite of all ecstasies and all efforts, it may be that +his disease—physical, mental and moral—has progressed to such a point +that it is necessary to confine him, or to castrate him, or even to +asphyxiate him painlessly. To say that I must love such a man as myself +is, to say the least, to be vague. We can see how the indiscriminate +preaching of such a formula would open the flood-gates of sentimentality +and fraud.<a name="vol_i_page_052" id="vol_i_page_052"></a></p> + +<p>Modern thinking says: Thou shalt love the highest possibilities of life, +and thou shalt labor diligently to foster them; moreover, because life +is always growing, and new possibilities are forever dawning in the +human spirit, thou shalt keep an open mind and an inquiring temper, and +be ready at any time to begin life afresh.</p> + +<p>Such is the formula. It is not simple; and when we come to apply it, we +find that it constantly grows more complex. When we attempt to decide +our duty to ourselves, we find that we have in us a number of different +beings, each with separate and sometimes conflicting duties and needs. +We have in us the physical man and the economic man, and these clamor +for their rights, and must have at least a part of their rights, before +we can go on to be the intellectual man, the moral man, or the artistic +man. So our life becomes a series of compromises and adjustments between +a thousand conflicting desires and duties; between the different beings +which we might be, but can be only to a certain extent, and at certain +times. We shall see, as we come to investigate one field after another +of human activity, that we never have an absolute certainty, never an +absolute right, never an absolute duty; never can we shut our eyes, and +go blindly ahead upon one course of action, to the exclusion of every +other consideration! On the contrary, we sit in the seat of +self-determination as a highly trained and skillful engineer. We keep +our eyes upon a dozen different gauges; we press a lever here and touch +a regulator there; we decide that now is a time for speed, and now for +caution; and knowing all the time that the safety, not merely of +ourselves, but of many passengers, depends upon the decisions of each +moment.<a name="vol_i_page_053" id="vol_i_page_053"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XI" id="CHAPTER_XI"></a>CHAPTER XI<br /><br /> +THE MIND AND THE BODY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the interaction between physical and mental things, and +the possibility of freedom in a world of fixed causes.)</p></div> + +<p>It is our plan, so far as possible, to discuss the problems of the mind +in one section of this book, and the problems of the body in another; +but just as we found that we could not separate our duties to ourself +from our duties to our neighbors, so we find that the mind and the body +are inextricably interwoven, and that whenever we probe deeply into one, +we discover the other. The interaction of the mind and the body is a +fascinating problem into which we must look for a moment, not because we +expect to solve it, but because it illuminates the whole subject.</p> + +<p>The human body is a machine. It takes in carbon and oxygen, and burns +them, and gives out carbon dioxide and other waste products, and +develops energy in proportion to the amount of carbon it consumes. This +machine has its elaborate apparatus of action and reaction, its sensory +organs where outside stimuli are received, its nerves like telegraph +wires to carry these impressions, its brain cells to store them and to +transform them into reactions. We know to some extent how these brain +cells work. We know what portions of the brain are devoted to this or +that activity. We know that if we stick a pin into a certain spot we +shall paralyze the left forefinger. We know that by injecting a certain +drug, or by breathing a certain gas, we can cause this or that sensation +or reaction, such as laughing or weeping or mania. We know what poisons +are generated in the system by anger, and what chemical changes take +place in a muscle that is tired. All this is part of a vast new science +which is called bio-chemistry, or the chemistry of life.</p> + +<p>Our bodies, therefore, are part of the material universe, and subject to +the laws or ways of being of this universe. The first of these laws that +we know is the law of causation. Every change in the universe has its +cause, and that in turn<a name="vol_i_page_054" id="vol_i_page_054"></a> had another cause; this chain is never broken, +no matter how far we go, and the same causes universally produce the +same effects. If you see a ball move on a billiard table, you know that +the ball did not move itself; you know that something struck the ball or +tilted the table. You discover that the motion of the ball moves the air +around it, and the waves of that motion are spread through the room. +They strike the walls, and the motion is carried on through the walls, +and if we had instruments sensitive enough, we could feel the motion of +that billiard ball at the other side of the world, and a few million +years from now at the most remote of the stars. This is what is called +the law of the conservation of energy, and when we discover something +like radium which seems to violate that law by giving out unlimited +quantities of energy, we investigate and discover a new form of energy +locked up in the atom. In the disintegration of the atom we have a +source of power which, when we have learned to use it, will multiply +perhaps millions of times the powers we are now able to use on this +earth. But energy, no matter how many times it is transformed, and in +what strange ways it reappears, always remains, and is never destroyed, +and never created out of nothing.</p> + +<p>My friend the great physiologist once took me into his laboratory and +showed me a little aquarium in which some minute creatures were wiggling +about—young sea-urchins, if I remember. The physiologist took a bottle +containing some chemical, and dropped a single drop into the water, and +instantly all these little black creatures, which had been darting +aimlessly in every direction through the water, turned and swam all in +one direction, toward the light. They swam until they touched the walls +of the aquarium, and there they stuck, trying their best to swim +farther. "And now," said my friend, "that is what we call a 'tropism,' +and all life is a tropism. What you see in that aquarium means that some +day we shall know just what combination of chemicals causes a human +being to move this way or that, to do this thing or that. When +bio-chemistry has progressed sufficiently, we shall be able to make +human qualities, perhaps in the sperm, perhaps in the embryo, perhaps +day by day by means of diet or injection."</p> + +<p>Said I: "Some day, when bio-chemistry has progressed far enough, you +will know what combination of chemicals causes a man to vote the +Democratic or Republican ticket."<a name="vol_i_page_055" id="vol_i_page_055"></a></p> + +<p>"Why not?" answered my friend. (He has a sense of humor about all things +except this sacred bio-chemistry.)</p> + +<p>Said I: "When you have got to that stage, keep the secret carefully, and +we will fix up a scheme, and a few days before election we will release +some gas in our big cities, and sweep the country for the Socialist +ticket."</p> + +<p>But jesting aside: if the human body is a material thing, existing in +the material world and subject to causation, there must be material +reasons for the actions of human bodies, just the same as for the moving +of billiard balls. We hear the sound of a billiard ball striking the +cushion, and we are prepared to accept the idea that the thing we call +hearing in us is caused by the impinging of sound waves upon our +eardrums. And if we investigate human beings in the mass, we find every +reason to believe that they act according to laws, and that there are +material causes for their acts. If you get up and shout fire in a +theater, you know how the audience will behave. If you study statistics, +you can say that in any large city a certain fixed number of human +beings are going to commit suicide every month; you can even say that +more are going to commit suicide in the month of June than in any other +month. You can say that more people are going to die at two o'clock in +the morning than at any other hour. You know that certain changes in the +weather will cause all human beings to behave in the same way. You know +that an increase of prices or an increase of unemployment will cause a +certain additional number of men to commit crimes, and a certain +additional number of women to become prostitutes. You know that if a man +overeats, his thoughts will change their color; he will have what he +calls "the blues." I might cite a thousand other illustrations to prove +that human minds are subject to material laws, and therefore to +investigation by the bio-chemists.</p> + +<p>But now, stop a moment. Here you sit reading a book. Something in the +book pleases you, and you say, "Good!" Perhaps you slap your knee or +clench your fist. Now here is a motion of your hand, which stirs the air +about you, and which, according to the laws of energy, will spread its +effects to the other side of the world, and even to the farthest of the +stars. Or perhaps the book makes you angry, and you throw it down in +disgust; an entirely different motion, which will affect the other side +of the world and the farthest of the<a name="vol_i_page_056" id="vol_i_page_056"></a> stars in an entirely different +way. The machine of the universe will be forever altered because of that +slapping of your knee or that throwing down of your book.</p> + +<p>And what was the cause of these things? So far as we can see, the +material cause was exactly the same in each case—the reading of certain +letters. Two human beings, sitting side by side and reading exactly the +same letters, might be affected in exactly opposite ways. It seems +hardly rational to maintain that the material difference of two pairs of +eyes, moving over exactly the same set of letters, could have resulted +in two such different motions of the hands. As a matter of fact, the +very same letters may affect the same person in different ways. The +composer, Edward MacDowell, once told me how on his birthday his pupils +sent him a gift, with a card containing some lines from the opera +"Rheingold," beginning, "O singe fort"—that is, "Oh, sing on." But the +composer happened, when glancing at the card, to think French instead of +German, and got the message, "Oh, powerful monkey!" This, of course, was +disconcerting to a famous piano performer, and his pupils, if they had +been watching his face, would have seen an unexpected reaction. It seems +manifest, does it not, that the cause of this difference of reaction was +not any difference of the letters, but purely a difference of <i>thought</i>? +So it appears that thoughts may change the material universe; they may +break the chain of causation, and interfere with material events.</p> + +<p>Compare the two things, a state of consciousness and say, a steam +shovel. They are entirely different, and so far as we can see, entirely +incompatible and unrelated. Can anyone imagine how a thought can turn +into a steam shovel, or a steam shovel into a thought? We can understand +how a steam shovel lifts a mass of earth out of the ground, and we can +understand how a human hand moves a lever which causes the shovel to +act; but we are unable to conceive how a state of mind—whether it be a +desire for pay, or an ideal of service, or a vision of the Panama +Canal—can so affect a steam shovel as to cause it to move. We can sit +and think motion at a billiard ball for a thousand years, and it does +not move; but when we think motion at our hand, it moves instantly, and +passes on the motion to the billiard ball or the steam shovel. When fire +touches our hand it sends some kind of vibration to the brain, and in +some inconceivable way that vibration is<a name="vol_i_page_057" id="vol_i_page_057"></a> turned into a state of +consciousness called pain, and that is turned, "as quick as thought," +into another kind of motion, the jerking back of our hand.</p> + +<p>So it seems certain that consciousness really does "butt in" on the +chain of natural causation. And yet, just see in what position this +leaves the scientist who is investigating life! Imagine if you can, the +plight of a doctor who wanted to prescribe a diet for a sick person, if +he knew that every piece of chicken and every piece of fish were free to +decide of its own impulse whether or not it would be digested in the +human stomach. But the plight of this doctor would be nothing to the +plight of the chemist or the biologist or the engineer who was asked to +do his thinking and his planning in a world containing a billion and a +quarter human beings, each one a lawless agent, each one a source of new +and unforeseeable energies, each one acting as a "first cause," and +starting new chains of activity, tearing the universe to pieces +according to his own whims. What kind of a universe would that be? It +would simply be a chaos; there could be no thinking, there could be no +life in it; there could be no two things the same in it, and no laws of +any sort.</p> + +<p>So then we fall back into the hands of the "determinists," who assert +one unbreakable chain of natural causation, and regard the human body as +an automaton. We go back to the bio-chemist, who purposes some day to +ascertain for us just exactly what molecules of matter in just what +positions and combinations in the brain cells of William Shakespeare +caused him to perpetrate a mixed metaphor. We go back to the belief that +human beings act as they must act, because the clock of life, wound up +and started, must move in such and such a fashion.</p> + +<p>But now, let us see what are the implications of that theory! Here am I +writing a book, appealing to men to act in certain ways. Of course, I +know that not all will follow my advice. Some will be foolish—or what +seems to me foolish. Others will be weak, and will resolve to act in +certain ways, and then go and act in other ways. But some will be just; +some will be free; some will use their brains—because, you see, I am +convinced that they <i>can</i> use their brains! I am convinced that ideas +will affect and stir them, in complete defiance of the bio-chemist, who +tells me that they act that way because of certain chemicals in their +brain cells, and that I write my<a name="vol_i_page_058" id="vol_i_page_058"></a> book because of other chemicals, and +that my idea that I am writing the book because I want to write it is a +delusion, and that the whole thing is happening just so because the +universe was wound up that way.</p> + +<p>Now, this an unsolved problem, and I have no solution to offer. What I +have set forth is in substance one of the four "antinomies" of Kant, and +you can see for yourself how it is possible to prove either side, and +impossible to be sure of either. Perhaps there is really a duality in +life. Perhaps there are two aspects of the universe, the material and +the spiritual, and perhaps they do not really interact as they seem to, +but both are guided and determined by some higher reality of life of +which we know nothing. In that case there would really be a chemical +equivalent for every thought, and there would be a trace of +consciousness for every material atom in the universe. Maybe the +theologians are right, and in the universal consciousness of God the +whole future exists predetermined. Maybe to God there is no such thing +as time; the past, the present, and the future are all alike to Him.</p> + +<p>There is nothing more painful to the human mind than to have to confess +its own impotence. Yet I can see no escape from the dilemma we are here +facing. There is not a man alive who does not assume the freedom of the +will, who does not show in all his acts that he agrees with old Dr. +Samuel Johnson: "We know we are free and there's an end on't." Without a +belief in freedom we cannot get beyond the animal, we cannot become the +masters of our own souls. And yet, the man who swallows that idea whole, +and goes out into the world and preaches personal morality to the +neglect of the fundamental economic facts, the facts of the body in its +relationship to all other bodies—we know what happens to that man; he +becomes a shouting fool. Unless he is literally a fool, or a knave, he +quickly discovers his own futility, and proceeds to use his common +sense, in spite of all his theories. "Come to Jesus!" cried William +Booth, and he went out in the streets of London to save souls with a +bass drum; but presently, in day by day contact with the degradation of +the London slums, he realized that he could not save souls so long as +those souls were dwelling in starved and lousy bodies. So William Booth +with his Salvation Army took to starting night shelters and cast-off +clothing bureaus!</p> + +<p>And of exactly the same sort is the bewilderment which<a name="vol_i_page_059" id="vol_i_page_059"></a> falls to the lot +of the scientist who is honest and willing to face the facts. The +bio-chemist with his test tubes and his microscopes and his complex +apparatus of research sits himself down and accumulates a mass of +information about the human body. He investigates the diseases of the +body and learns in detail just how these diseases spread and sometimes +how they are caused; he can present you with a diagnosis, showing the +exact stage to which the degeneration of a certain organ has proceeded, +and perhaps he can suggest to you a change of diet or some drug which +will, for a time at least, check the process of the breakdown. But in +other cases he will be perfectly helpless; he will be, as it were, +buried under the mass of detail which he has accumulated; he will find +the vital energy depressed, and he will not know any way to renew it. +But along will come some mental specialist, who in a half hour's talk +with the patient, by a simple change in the patient's <i>ideas</i>, will +completely make over the patient's life, and set going a new vital +process which will restore the body to its former health. A religious +enthusiast may do this, a psychotherapist may do it, a moral genius may +do it; and the physician with all his learning will find himself like a +man on the outside of a house, peering in through the windows and trying +in vain to find out something about the life of the family and its +guests.</p> + +<p>This is humiliating to the chemist and the medical man, but they have to +face it, because it is a fact. In the seat of authority over the human +body there sits a higher being which, without any religious +implications, we may call the soul; or, if it is impossible to get away +from the religious implication of that word, we will call it the +consciousness, or the personality. This master of the house of life is +in many ways dependent upon the house. If the furnace goes out he +freezes, and if the house takes fire and burns up—well, he disappears +and leaves no address. But in other ways the master of the house is +really master, and is a worker of miracles. He does things which we do +not at all understand, and cannot yet even foresee, but which often +completely make the house over.</p> + +<p>William James, a scientist of real authority, has a wonderful essay, +"The Powers of Men," in which he sets forth the fact that human beings +as a general rule make use of only a small portion of the energies which +dwell in their beings, and that one of our problems is to find the ways +by which we can<a name="vol_i_page_060" id="vol_i_page_060"></a> draw upon stores of hidden energy which we have within +us. Also, in a fascinating book, "Varieties of the Religious +Experience," James has endeavored to study and analyze the phenomena +which hitherto the physician and the biologist have been disposed to +ridicule and neglect. But unless I am mistaken, every scientist in the +end will be forced to come back to the central fact, that life is a +unity, and that the heart of it is the spirit; that what we call the +will is not an accident, not a delusion, not some by-product of nature, +but is the very secret of life; and that behind it is a vast ocean of +power, which now and then sweeps away all dykes, and floods into the +human consciousness.</p> + +<p>The writer of this book is now a patient and plodding teacher of a +certain economic doctrine, a preacher of what he might call +anti-parasitism. He has come to the conclusion that the habit of men to +enslave their fellows and exploit them and draw their substance from +them without return—that this habit is destructive to all civilization, +and is incompatible with any of the higher forms of life, intellectual, +moral or artistic. He has come to the conclusion that there is no use +attempting to build a structure of social life until there is a sound +foundation; in other words, until the capitalist system has been +replaced by cooperation. But in his youth he was, or thought he was, a +poet, and touched upon that strange and wonderful thing which we call +genius. He saw his own consciousness, as it were a leaf driven before a +mighty tempest of spiritual energy. And he believes that this experience +was no delusion, but was a revelation of the hidden mysteries of being. +He still has memories of this startling experience, still hints of it in +his consciousness; something still leaps in his memory, like a +race-horse, or like the war-horse of Revelations, which "scenteth the +battle afar off, the thunder of the captains and the shouting." Because +of these things he can never accept any philosophy which shackles the +human spirit, he will never in his thought attempt to set bounds to the +possibilities of human life. The very heart of life beats in us, the +wonder of it and the glory of it swells like a tide behind us. New +universes are born in us, or, if you prefer, they are made by us; and +the process is one of endless joy, of rapture beyond anything that the +average man can at present imagine, or that any instruments invented by +science can weigh or measure.<a name="vol_i_page_061" id="vol_i_page_061"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XII" id="CHAPTER_XII"></a>CHAPTER XII<br /><br /> +THE MIND OF THE BODY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the subconscious mind, what it is, what it does to the +body, and how it can be controlled and made use of by the +intelligence.)</p></div> + +<p>The importance of the mind in matters of health becomes clearer when we +understand that what we commonly call our minds—the mental states which +confront us day by day in our consciousness—are really but a small +portion of our total mind. In addition to this conscious mind there is +an enormous mass of our personality which is like a storehouse attached +to our dwelling, a place to which we do not often go, but to which we +can go in case of need. This storehouse is our memory, the things we +know and can recall at will. And then there is another, still vaster +storehouse—no one has ever measured or guessed the size of it—which +apparently contains everything that we have ever known, perhaps also +everything that our ancestors have known. A common simile for the human +mind is that of an iceberg; a certain portion of it appears above the +surface of the sea, but there is seven times as much of it floating out +of sight under the water.</p> + +<p>This subconscious mind seems to be the portion most closely united with +the body. It has its seat in the back parts of the brain, in the spinal +cord and the greater nervous ganglia, such as the solar plexus. It is +the portion of our mind which controls the activities of our body, all +those miraculous things which went on before we first opened our eyes to +the light, and which go on while we sleep, and never cease until we die. +When we cut our finger and admit foreign germs to our blood, some +mysterious power causes millions of our blood corpuscles to be rushed to +this spot, to destroy and devour the invading enemy. We do not know how +this is done, but it is an intelligent act, measured and precisely +regulated, as much so as a railroad time-table. When the supply of +nourishment in the body becomes low, something issues a notice by way of +our stomach, which we call hunger; when we take food into the stomach, +something pours out the gastric juice to digest it; when this digested +food is prepared and taken up in the blood<a name="vol_i_page_062" id="vol_i_page_062"></a> stream, something decides +what portion of it shall be turned into muscle, what into brain cells, +what into hair, what into finger nails. Sometimes, of course, mistakes +are made and we have diseases. But for the most part all this infinitely +intricate process goes on day and night without a hitch, and it is all +the work of what we might call "the mind of the body."</p> + +<p>And just as our material bodies are the product of an age-long process +of development repeated in embryo by every individual, so is this mental +life a product of long development, and carries memories of this far-off +process. In our instincts there dwells all the past, not merely of the +human race, but of all life, and if we should ever succeed in completely +probing the subconscious mind and bringing it into our consciousness, it +would be the same as if we were free to ramble about in all the past. +Huxley set forth the fact that all the history of evolution is told in a +piece of chalk; and we probably do not exaggerate in saying that all the +history of the universe is in the subconscious mind of every human +being. When the partridge which has just come out of the egg sees the +shadow of the hawk flit by and crouches motionless as a leaf, the +partridge is not acting upon any knowledge which it has acquired in the +few minutes since it was hatched. It is acting upon a knowledge +impressed upon its subconscious mind by the experience of millions of +partridges, perhaps for tens of thousands of years. When the physician +lifts the newly born infant by its ankle and spanks it to make it cry, +the physician is using his conscious reason, because he has learned from +previous experience, or has been taught in the schools that it is +necessary for the child's breathing apparatus to be instantly cleared. +But when the child responds to the spanking with a yell, it is not moved +by reasoned indignation at an undeserved injury; it is following an +automatic reaction, as a result of the experience of infants in the +stone age, experience which in some obscure way has been registered and +stored in the infant cerebellum.</p> + +<p>Science is now groping its way through this underworld of thought. +Obviously we should have here a most powerful means of influencing the +body, if by any chance we could control it. We are continually seeking +in medical and surgical ways to stimulate or to retard activities of the +body, which are controlled entirely by this subconscious mind. If we are +suffering intense pain in a joint, we put on a mustard plaster, what we +call a counter-irritant, to trouble the skin and draw<a name="vol_i_page_063" id="vol_i_page_063"></a> the congested +blood away from the place of the pain. On the other hand, we may +stimulate the functions of the intestines by the application of hot +fomentations, to bring the blood more actively to that region. But if by +any means we could make clear our wishes to the subconscious mind, we +should be dealing with headquarters, and should get quicker and more +permanent results.</p> + +<p>Can we by any possibility do this? To begin with, let me tell you of a +simple experiment that I have witnessed. I once knew a man who had +learned to control the circulation of his blood by his conscious will. I +have seen him lay his two hands on the table, both of the same color, +and without moving the hands, cause one hand to turn red and the other +to turn pale. And, obviously, so far as this man is concerned, the +problem of counter-irritants has been solved. He is a mental mustard +plaster.</p> + +<p>And what was done by this man's own will can be done to others in many +ways. The most obvious is a device which we call hypnotism. This is a +kind of sleep which affects only the conscious control of the body, but +leaves all the senses awake. In this hypnotic sleep or "trance" we +discover that the subconscious mind is a good deal like the Henry Dubb +of the Socialist cartoons; it is faithful and persistent, very strong in +its own limited field, but comically credulous, willing to believe +anything that is told it, and to take orders from any one who climbs +into the seat of authority. You have perhaps attended one of the +exhibitions which traveling hypnotists are accustomed to give in country +villages. You have seen some bumpkin brought upon the stage and +hypnotized, and told that he is in the water and must swim for his life, +or that he is in the midst of a hornets' nest, or that his trousers are +torn in the seat—any comical thing that will cause an audience to howl +with laughter.</p> + +<p>These facts were first discovered nearly a hundred and fifty years ago +by a French doctor named Mesmer. He was a good deal of a charlatan, and +would not reveal his secrets, and probably the scientific men of that +time were glad to despise him, because what he did was so new and +strange. There is a certain type of scientific mind which sits aloft on +a throne with a framed diploma above its head, and says that what it +knows is science and what it does not know is nonsense. And so +"mesmerism" was left for the quacks and traveling showmen.<a name="vol_i_page_064" id="vol_i_page_064"></a> But half a +century later a French physician named Liébault took up this method of +hypnotism, without all the fakery that had been attached to it. He +experimented and discovered that he could cure not merely phobias and +manias, fixed ideas, hysterias and melancholias; he could cure definite +physical diseases of the physical body, such as headache, rheumatism, +and hemorrhage. Later on two other physicians, Janet and Charcot, +developed definite schools of "psychotherapy." They rejected hypnotism +as in most cases too dangerous, but used a milder form which is known as +"hypnoidization." You would be surprised to know how many ailments which +baffle the skill of medical men and surgeons yield completely to a +single brief treatment by such a mental specialist.</p> + +<p>All that is necessary is some method to tap the subconscious mind. In +many cases the subconsciousness knows what is the matter, and will tell +at once—a secret that is completely hidden from the consciousness. For +example, a man's hands shake; they have been shaking for years, and he +has no idea why, but his subconscious mind explains that they first +began to shake with grief over the death of his wife; also, the +subconscious mind meekly and instantly accepts the suggestion that the +time for grief is past, and that the hands will never shake again.</p> + +<p>Or here is a woman who has become convinced that worms are crawling all +over her. Everything that touches her becomes a worm, even the wrinkles +in her dress are worms, and she is wild with nervousness, and of course +is on the way to the lunatic asylum. She is hypnotized and sees the +operator catching these worms one by one and killing them. She is told +that he has killed the last, but she insists, "No, there is one more." +The operator clutches that one, and she is perfectly satisfied, and +completely cured. Her husband writes, expressing his relief that he no +longer has to "sleep every night in a fish pond." This instance with +many others is told by Professor Quackenbos in his book, "Hypnotic +Therapeutics."</p> + +<p>Among the most powerful means to influence the subconscious personality +is religious excitement. Religion has come down to us from ancient +times, and its fears and ecstasies are a part of our instinctive +endowment. Those who can sway religious emotions can cure disease, not +merely fixed ideas, but many diseases which appear to be entirely +physical, but which psycho-analysis reveals to be hysterical in nature. +Of course<a name="vol_i_page_065" id="vol_i_page_065"></a> these religious persons who heal by laying on of hands or by +purely mental means deny indignantly that they are using hypnotism or +anything like it. I am aware that I shall bring upon myself a flood of +letters from Christian Scientists if I identify their methods of curing +with "animal magnetism" and "manipulation," and other devices of the +devil which they repudiate. All I can say is that their miracles are +brought about by affecting the subconscious mind; there is no other way +to bring them about, and for my part I cannot see that it makes a great +difference whether the subconscious mind is affected by a hand laid on +the forehead, or by a hand waved in the air, or by an incantation +pronounced, or by a prayer thought in silence. If you can persuade the +subconscious mind that God is operating upon it, that God is omnipotent +and is directing this particular healing, that is the most powerful +suggestion imaginable, and is the basis of many cures. But if in order +to achieve this, it is necessary for me to persuade myself that I can +find some meaning in the metaphysical moonshine of Mother Eddy—why, +then, I am very sorry, but I really prefer to remain sick.</p> + +<p>But such is not the case. You do not have to believe anything that is +not true; you simply have to understand the machinery of the +subconscious, and how to operate it. We are only beginning to acquire +that knowledge, and we need an open mind, free both from the dogmatism +of the medical men and the fanaticism of the "faith curists." A few +years ago in London I met a number of people who were experimenting in +an entirely open-minded way with mental healing, and I was interested in +their ideas. I happened to be traveling on the Continent, and on the +train my wife was seized by a very dreadful headache. She was lying with +her head in my lap, suffering acutely, and I thought I would try an +experiment, so I put my hand upon her forehead, without telling her what +I was doing, and concentrated my attention with the greatest possible +intensity upon her headache. I had an idea of the cause of it; I +understood that headaches are caused by the irritation of the sensory +nerves of the brain by fatigue poisons, or other waste matter which the +blood has not been able to eliminate. I formed in my mind a vivid +picture of what the blood would have to do to relieve that headache, and +I concentrated my mental energies upon the command to her subconscious +mind that it should perform these particular functions.<a name="vol_i_page_066" id="vol_i_page_066"></a> In a few +minutes my wife sat up with a look of great surprise on her face and +said, "Why, my headache is gone! It went all at once!"</p> + +<p>That, of course, might have been a coincidence; but I tried the +experiment many times, and it happened over and over. On another +occasion I was able to cure the pain of an ulcerated tooth; I was able +to cure it half a dozen times, but never permanently, it always +returned, and finally the tooth had to come out. My wife experimented +with me in the same way, and found that she was able to cure an attack +of dyspepsia; but, curiously enough, she at once gave herself a case of +dyspepsia—something she had never known in her life before. So now I +will not allow her to experiment with me, and she will not allow me to +experiment with her! But we are quite sure that people with psychic +gifts can definitely affect the subconscious mind of others by purely +mental means. We are prepared to believe in the miracles of the New +Testament, and in the wonders of Lourdes, as well as in the healings of +the Christian Scientists and the New Thoughters, which cannot be +disputed by any one who is willing to take the trouble to investigate. +We can face these facts without losing our reason, without ceasing to +believe that everything in life has a cause, and that we can find out +this cause if we investigate thoroughly.<a name="vol_i_page_067" id="vol_i_page_067"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XIII" id="CHAPTER_XIII"></a>CHAPTER XIII<br /><br /> +EXPLORING THE SUBCONSCIOUS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses automatic writing, the analysis of dreams, and other +methods by which a whole new universe of life has been brought to +human knowledge.)</p></div> + +<p>One of the most common methods of exploring the subconscious mind is the +method of automatic writing. I have never tried this myself, but tens of +thousands of people are sitting every night with a "ouija" in front of +them, holding a pencil on a piece of paper and letting their +subconscious minds write what they please. Most of them are hoping to +get messages from the dead—a problem which we shall discuss in the next +chapter. Suffice it for the moment to say that automatic writing and +table rapping and other devices of mediumship have opened up to us a +vast mass of subconscious mentality. A part of the scientific world +still takes a contemptuous attitude and calls this all humbug, but many +of our greatest scientists have been persuaded to investigate, and have +become convinced that in this mass of subconsciousness there is mingled, +not merely the mind of the medium, but the minds of all those present, +and possibly other minds as well. For my part, I do not see how any one +can study disinterestedly the proceedings of the Society for Psychical +Research and not become convinced that telepathy at least is one of the +powers of the subconscious mind.</p> + +<p>Telepathy is what is popularly known as "thought transmission." Every +one must know people who are what is called "psychic," and will know +what is happening to some friend in another part of the world, or will +go upstairs because they "sense" that some one wants them, or will go to +the door because they "have a hunch" that some one is coming. And maybe +these things are only chance, but you will be unscientific if you do not +take the trouble to read and learn what modern investigators have +brought out on such subjects.</p> + +<p>This much is certain, and is denied by no competent investigator: +whatever has been in your mind is there still, and it is possible to +find a way of tapping the buried memory. An old<a name="vol_i_page_068" id="vol_i_page_068"></a> woman, delirious with +fever, begins to babble in a strange language, and it is discovered that +she is talking ancient Hebrew. The woman is entirely illiterate, and her +conscious memory knows no language but her own, her conscious mind has +no ideas beyond those of her domestic life and the gossip of the +village. But investigation is made, and it is discovered that when this +woman was a girl, she worked in the home of a Hebrew scholar, and heard +him reading aloud. She did not understand a word of what she heard, and +was not consciously listening to it; nevertheless, every syllable of it +had been stored away forever by her subconscious mind. Innumerable cases +of this sort have been established; and, as a matter of fact, we might +have been prepared for such discoveries by the memory-feats of the +conscious mind. It is well known that Mozart, when a child, could listen +to a new opera, and go home and play it over note for note. At present +there is a child in America, giving exhibitions in public, carrying on +thirty games of chess at the same time. There have been others who do +sums of mental arithmetic, such as multiplying thirty-two figures by +thirty-two figures, or reciting the Bible backwards.</p> + +<p>All this seems incredible; and yet there is something still more +incredible. Suppose that these same powers, which are stored in our +subconscious minds, were stored also in the minds of animals! A few +years ago Maurice Maeterlinck published a book, "The Unknown Guest," in +the course of which he tells about his experiments with the so-called +Elberfeld horses: two animals which had been trained for years by their +owner to give signals by moving their forefeet, and which apparently +could count and divide and multiply large sums, and extract square and +cube root, and spell out names, and recognize sounds, scents and colors, +and read time from the face of a watch. Of course, it is easy to say +that this is absurd, that the horses must have got some signals from +their trainer; but, as it happened, they would do their work in the +absence of their trainer; they would do it in the dark, or with a sack +over their heads, and the best scientific minds of Germany were unable +to suggest any test conditions which could not be met. There have been +many gigantic frauds in the world, and this may have been one of them; +on the other hand, there have been many new discoveries, and for my part +I will finish exploring the miracles of the subconscious mind of man,<a name="vol_i_page_069" id="vol_i_page_069"></a> +before I presume to say that anything is impossible in the subconscious +mind of a horse or a dog. Also I will wait for some learned person to +explain to me how the subconscious minds of horses and dogs know enough +to build and repair their bones and teeth, so cleverly that modern +architectural and engineering science could teach them nothing. I ask, +also, if it is possible to find a region in the subconsciousness which +is common to two people, why is it absurd to suggest that there might be +a region common to a man and a horse? Why is this any more absurd than +that they should eat the same food and breathe the same air and feel the +same affection and be frightened at the same dangers?</p> + +<p>The only persons who will be dogmatic about such subjects are the +persons who are ignorant. Those who take the trouble to investigate, +discover more wonderful things every day, and they realize that we have +here a whole universe of knowledge, to which we have as yet barely +opened the doors. Consider, for example, the facts which we are +acquiring on the subject of personality and what it means. You would +say, perhaps, that if there is anything you know positively, it is that +you are one person, and have never been anybody else, and that your body +belongs to you, and that nobody else ever has used or ever can use it. +But what would you say if I told you that tomorrow "you" might cease to +be, and somebody else might be in possession of your body, walking it +around and wearing its clothes and spending its money? What if I were to +tell you that there might be in "you," or in your body, half a dozen +different personalities which you have never known or dreamed of, and +that tomorrow there might break out a war between them and "you," as to +which of the half dozen people should hear with your ears and speak with +your tongue and walk about with your clothes on? Unless you are familiar +with the literature of multiple personality, you would surely say that +this was unbelievable—quite as much so as a mathematical horse!</p> + +<p>Let us begin with the case of the Reverend Ansel Bourne, who was many +years ago a perfectly respectable clergyman in a Rhode Island town. One +day he disappeared, and his family did not hear of him. A year or two +later there was a store-keeper in a town in Pennsylvania, who suddenly +came to himself as the Reverend Ansel Bourne, not knowing what he had +been in the meantime, or how he came to be keeping a store.<a name="vol_i_page_070" id="vol_i_page_070"></a> Under +hypnotism it developed that he had in him two personalities, and his +trance personality recollected all that had been happening in the +meantime and told about it freely.</p> + +<p>Or take the still more fascinating case of the young lady who is known +in the literature of psychotherapy as Miss Beauchamp. Her story is told +in a book, "The Dissociation of a Personality," by Dr. Morton Prince of +Boston. Some thirty years ago Miss Beauchamp, a very conscientious and +dignified young lady, became nervous and ill, and took to doing strange +things, which were a source of shame and humiliation to her. Under +hypnotism it was discovered to be a case of multiple personality. The +other personality, who finally gave herself the name of Sally, was +entirely different in character from Miss Beauchamp, being mischievous, +vain, and primitive as a child. She conceived an intense dislike for +Miss Beauchamp, whom she called by abusive names; at times when she +could get possession of Miss Beauchamp's body, she delighted in playing +humiliating tricks upon her enemy, spending her money, running her into +debt, breaking her engagements, disgracing her before her friends. Sally +was always well and Miss Beauchamp was always ill, and Sally would take +the body, for which they fought for possession, and take it for long and +exhausting walks, and leave it cold and miserable, lost and penniless, +in the possession of Miss Beauchamp! And of course this made Miss +Beauchamp more and more a wreck, and Sally took possession of more and +more of her time. Sally knew everything that Miss Beauchamp did and +thought, but Miss Beauchamp did not know about Sally. She only knew that +there were gaps in her life, during which she did things she could not +explain. And because she did not want her friends to think her insane, +she would try to hide this dreadful condition of affairs; but Sally +would spoil her plans by writing letters to her friends, and also by +writing insulting letters for Miss Beauchamp to find when she took +possession again.</p> + +<p>Then one day, after several years of treatment, there appeared yet +another personality, who knew nothing about Miss Beauchamp or Sally +either, and only knew what Miss Beauchamp had known up to some years +before. Miss Beauchamp had a college education, and wrote and spoke +French; Sally knew no French, and tried in vain to learn it; the new +personality did not have a college education at all. Nevertheless,<a name="vol_i_page_071" id="vol_i_page_071"></a> +after long experiment, the story of which is as fascinating as any novel +you ever read, Dr. Prince discovered that this was the real Miss +Beauchamp; the others were "split off" personalities. He traced the +cause to a severe mental shock, and succeeded in the end in combining +the first Miss Beauchamp with the last, and in suppressing the obstinate +and wanton Sally. As you read this story, you watch him mentally +murdering a human being; "Sally" clamors pitifully for life, but he +condemns her to death, and relentlessly executes his sentence. It is a +"movie" thriller with a happy ending, and I should think it would make +disconcerting reading to persons who believe that each of us is one +immortal soul, or "has" one immortal soul, and is responsible for it to +a personal God.</p> + +<p>There is never any end to the problems of these multiple personalities, +and each case is a test of the judgment and ingenuity of the specialist. +He will try to make one personality "stick," and will fail, and will +have to accept another, or a combination of two. In one case, he found +that he could not get the right personality to "stick" except under +hypnosis, so he decided to leave the man in a mild state of trance, and +the new personality lived all the rest of its life in that condition. If +you wish to know more about this subject you can find books in any +well-equipped library. I mention one, "The Riddle of Personality," by H. +Addington Bruce, because it contains in the appendix an excellent list +of the literature of the subconscious in all its many aspects.</p> + +<p>There is another, and most fascinating method of exploring this +underworld of the mind, and that is the study of dreams. Some fifteen +years ago a psychotherapist in New York told me about the discoveries of +a physician in Vienna, and gave me some pamphlets, written in very +difficult and technical German. Since then this Professor Freud has been +translated, and has become a fad, and the absurdities of his followers +make one a little apologetic for him. But we do not give up Jesus +because of the torturers and bigots who call themselves Christians, and +in the same way we have no right to blame Freud for all the absurdities +of the psychoanalysts.</p> + +<p>Probably there never was a time in human history when there were not +people who interpreted dreams, and you can still buy "dream books" for +twenty-five cents, and learn that a white horse means that you are going +to get a letter from your sweetheart tomorrow; then you can buy another +dream<a name="vol_i_page_072" id="vol_i_page_072"></a> book, telling you that a white horse means there is going to be a +death in your family within the year. Naturally this prejudices thinking +people against dream analysis; yet, dreams are facts, and every fact has +its cause, and if you dream about a white horse, there must assuredly be +some reason for your dreaming this particular thing. Of course we know +that if you eat mince-pie and welsh-rabbit at midnight, you will dream +about something terrible; but will it be snakes, or will it be a +railroad wreck, or will it be white horses trampling over you? +Obviously, it may be a million different unpleasant things; and what is +it that picks out this or that from the infinite store of your memory, +and brings it into the region of half-consciousness which we call the +dream?</p> + +<p>Professor Freud's discovery is in brief that the dream is a +wish-fulfillment. Our instincts present to our consciousness a great +mass of impulses and desires, and among these the consciousness selects +what it pleases, and represses and refuses to recognize or to act upon +the others. But maybe these decisions are not altogether satisfactory to +the subconsciousness. The mind of the body is in rebellion against the +mind—shall we say of reason, or shall we say of society? The mind of +society, otherwise known as the moral law, says that you shall be a good +little boy, and shall go to school and learn what you are told, and on +Sunday go to church and sit very still through a long sermon; whereas, +the body of a boy would rather be a savage, hunting birds' nests and +scalping enemies and exploring magic caves full of precious jewels. So +the subconsciousness of the boy, balked and miserable, awaits its time, +and finds its satisfaction when the boy is asleep and his moral censor +has relaxed its control.</p> + +<p>This dream mind is not a logical and orderly thing like the conscious +mind; it is not business-like and civilized, it does not deal in +abstractions. It is far more interested in things than in words; it does +not present us with formulas, but with pictures, and with stories of +weird and wonderful happenings. It is like the mind of the race, which +we study in legends and religions. It does not tell us that the sun is a +mass of incandescent hydrogen gas, so and so many miles in diameter; it +tells us that the sun is a cosmic hero who slays the black dragon of +night. So the mind of our body presents us with innumerable pictures and +symbols, exactly such as we find in poetry. There may be, and frequently +is, dispute as to just<a name="vol_i_page_073" id="vol_i_page_073"></a> what a poet meant by this or that particular +image, but if we read all the work of any particular poet, we get a +certain impression of that poet's individuality. If he is always talking +about the perfume of women's hair and the gleam of the white flesh of +nymphs in the thickets, we are not left in doubt as to what is wrong +with this poet.</p> + +<p>And just so, when the expert sets to work to examine all the dreams that +any one person can remember, day after day, sooner or later the expert +observes that these dreams hover continually about one particular +subject; and by questioning the person, he can find out what is the +secret which is troubling the person, perhaps without the person himself +being aware of it. Of course there are many people who like nothing so +much as to talk about themselves; and many are spending their time and +their money on the latest fad of being "psyched," who would, in any +properly organized world, be put to work at hoeing weeds or washing +their own clothes. Nevertheless, it is a fact that there are real mental +disorders in the world, and innumerable honest and earnest people who +have something the matter with them which they do not understand. Here +is one way by which the conscientious investigator can find out what the +trouble is, and make it clear to them, and by establishing harmony +between their conscious and their subconscious minds, can many times put +them in the way of health and happiness.</p> + +<p>Through psychoanalysis we are enabled to understand the "split" +personality and its cause. We discover that almost everyone has more or +less rudimentary forms of multiple personality hidden within him; made +out of desires and traits which he does not like, or which the world +forces him to drive into the deeps of his being. These may be evil +impulses, of sex or violence; they may be the most noble altruisms, or +artistic yearnings, ridiculous things in a world of "hustle." A quite +normal man or woman may keep a separate self, apart from the world, +living a Jekyll life of business propriety and a Hyde life of religious +or musical ecstasy. Or again, the repressed impulses may integrate +themselves in the unconscious, and you may have genius or lunacy or +both—"great wits to madness near allied." The modern knowledge on such +dark mysteries you may find in Hart's "The Psychology of Insanity."<a name="vol_i_page_074" id="vol_i_page_074"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XIV" id="CHAPTER_XIV"></a>CHAPTER XIV<br /><br /> +THE PROBLEM OF IMMORTALITY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the survival of personality from the moral point of +view: that is, have we any claim upon life, entitling us to live +forever?)</p></div> + +<p>As we explore the deeps of the subconsciousness, our own and other +people's, we find ourselves confronting the strange question: Is it all +our own mind, and that of other living people, or are we by any chance +dealing with the minds of those who are dead? A great many earnest +people, and some very learned people, are fully convinced that the +latter is the case, and we have now to consider their arguments.</p> + +<p>When I was a little boy I used to read and hear ghost stories, and would +shudder over them; but I was given to understand that all this was just +imagination, I must not take ghosts seriously, any more than fairies or +dragons or nymphs or satyrs. For an educated person to take ghosts +seriously—well, such a person would be almost as comical as that +supremely comical person, the flying-machine man. Would you believe it, +in those days there actually were people who believed they could learn +to fly in the air, and spent their time manufacturing machines for this +purpose! There was a scientist in Washington who had this "bug," and +built himself a machine and started to fly, and fell into the Potomac +river. We all laughed at him—we laughed so long and so loud that we +killed the poor man; and then, a few years later, somebody took that +machine of Professor Langley's and actually did fly with it! But that +was after I had grown up a bit more, and was not quite so ready to laugh +at an idea because it was new.</p> + +<p>I remember vividly my first meeting with a man who believed in ghosts. +He was a Unitarian clergyman, the Reverend Minot J. Savage of New York. +I was sixteen years old, and just breaking out of my theological shell, +and Doctor Savage helped to pry me loose. He was a grave and kindly man, +of great learning and intelligence, and I remember vividly my +consternation when one day he told me—oh, yes, he had seen many ghosts, +he was accustomed to talk with ghosts<a name="vol_i_page_075" id="vol_i_page_075"></a> every now and then. There was no +doubt whatever that ghosts existed!</p> + +<p>He told me many stories. I remember one so well that I do not have to go +back to his books to look up the details. It was in the days before the +Atlantic cable, and he had a friend who took a steamer to England. One +night Doctor Savage was awakened and found the ghost of his friend +standing by his bedside. The ship had gone down off the Irish coast, so +the ghost declared, but the friend did not want Doctor Savage to think +that he had suffered from the pangs of drowning; he had been struck on +the left side of the head by a beam of the ship and had been killed +instantly. Doctor Savage wrote down these circumstances and had them +witnessed by a number of people, and two or three weeks later he +received word that the body of his friend had been found on the Irish +coast, with the left side of the head crushed in.</p> + +<p>So then, of course, I studied the subject of ghosts. I have studied it +off and on ever since, and have read most of the important new +discoveries and arguments of the psychic researchers. To begin with, I +will mention the contents of two large volumes, Gurney's "Phantasms of +the Living." In this book are narrated many hundreds of cases, of which +Doctor Savage's story is a type. It appears that persons at the moment +of death, or in times of great mental stress, do somehow have the power +to communicate with other people, even at the other side of the world. A +few such cases might be attributed to coincidence or to fraud, but when +you have so many cases, attested in minute detail by so many hundreds of +otherwise honest people, you are not being scientific but simply stupid +if you dismiss the whole subject with contempt.</p> + +<p>Gurney discusses the phenomenon and its probable causes. We know, of +course, that hallucinations are among the most common of psychic +phenomenon. Your subconscious mind can be caused to see and hear and +feel anything; likewise it has power to cause you to see and hear and +feel anything. In practically all cases of multiple personality some of +the split-off personalities can cause the others to see and hear and +feel. And the consciousness, you must understand, takes these things to +be just as real as real things; there is no way you can tell an +hallucination from reality—except to ask other people about it. And if +we admit the idea of telepathy, we may say that phantasms are +hallucinations caused by this means;<a name="vol_i_page_076" id="vol_i_page_076"></a> that is, the subconscious mind of +your wife or your mother or your friend who is ill or dying, transmits +to your subconscious mind some vivid impression, which causes your own +subconscious mind to present to your consciousness a perfect image of +that person, walking and talking with you, and your consciousness has no +way of telling but that the image is real.</p> + +<p>So much for phantasms of the living. But are there any phantasms of the +dead? Are there any cases in which the time of the appearance can be +proven to be subsequent to the time of death? Even this would not prove +survival, of course; it is perfectly possible that the telepathic +impulse might be delayed in our own minds, it might not flash into +consciousness until our own state of mind made it possible. Can we say +that there are cases in which the facts communicated are such as to +convince us that the person was already dead, and was telling us +something as a dead person and not as a living one?</p> + +<p>Before we go into this question, let us clear the ground for the subject +by discussing the survival of personality from a more general +standpoint. What is it that we want to prove? What are the probabilities +of its being true? What would be the consequences of its not being true? +Have we any grounds, other than those of psychic research, for thinking +that it is true, or that it may be true, or that it ought to be true? +What, so to speak, are the morals of the doctrine of immortality?</p> + +<p>Well, to begin with, the survival of the soul after death and forever is +one of the principal doctrines of the Christian religion. Many devout +Christians will read this book, and I will seem to them blasphemous when +I say that this argument does not concern me. I count myself one of the +lovers and friends of Jesus, I am presumptuous enough to believe that if +he were on earth, I would understand him and get along with him +excellently; but I do not know any reason why I should believe this, +that, or the other doctrine about life because any religious sect, +founded upon the name of Jesus, commands me so to believe. I see no more +reason for adopting the idea of heaven because it is a Christian idea +than I see for adopting the idea of reincarnation because it is a +precious and holy idea to hundreds of millions of Buddhists. I have some +very good friends who are Theosophists, and are quite convinced of this +idea of reincarnation; that is, that the soul comes back into life over +and over again in many different bodies, thus completing itself and +renewing itself and expiating its sins. My<a name="vol_i_page_077" id="vol_i_page_077"></a> Theosophist friends have a +most elaborate and complicated body of what they consider to be +knowledge on this subject; yet I have to take the liberty of saying that +I cannot see that it has any relation to reality. It seems to me as +completely unproven as any other fairy story, or myth, or legend—for +example, the seven infernos of Dante, and the elaborate and complicated +torments that are suffered there.</p> + +<p>But, it will be argued, Jesus rose from the dead, and thus proved the +immortality of the soul. Now, in the first place, there are many learned +investigators who consider there is insufficient evidence for believing +that Jesus ever lived; and certainly if this be so, it will be difficult +to prove that he rose from the dead. Again, it was a common occurrence +for crucified men not to die; sometimes it happened that their guards +allowed them to be spirited away—even nowadays we have known of prison +guards being bribed to allow a prisoner to escape. Again, the events of +the return of Jesus may have been just such psychic phenomena as we are +trying in this chapter to explain. Or, once more, they may have been +purely legends. A very brief study will convince a thinking person that +the people of that time were ready to believe anything, and to accept +facts upon such authority, and to make them the basis for a scientific +conclusion, is simply to be childish.</p> + +<p>I shall be told, of course, that it is in the Bible, and therefore it +must be true. The Bible is inspired, you say; and perhaps this is so. +But then, a great deal of other literature is inspired, and that does +not relieve me of the task of comparing these various inspirations, and +judging them, and picking out what is of use to me. The Bible is the +literature of the ancient Hebrews for a couple of thousand years. It +represents what the race mind of a great people for one generation after +another judged worth recording and preserving. You may get an idea what +this means, if you will picture to yourself a large volume of English +literature, containing some Teutonic myths, and the Saxon chronicles, +and the "Morte d'Arthur," and several of Chaucer's stories, and some +Irish fairy tales, and some of Bacon's essays, and Shakespeare's "Venus +and Adonis," and the English prayer book, and the architect's +specifications for Westminster Abbey, and a good part of "Burke's +Peerage"; also Blackstone's "Commentaries," a number of Wesley's hymns, +and Pope's "Essay on Man," and some chapters of Carlyle's "Past and +Present," and Gladstone's<a name="vol_i_page_078" id="vol_i_page_078"></a> speeches, and Blake's poems, and Captain +Cook's story of his voyage around the world, and Southey's "Life of +Nelson," and Morris's "News from Nowhere," and Blatchford's "Merrie +England," and scores of pages from Hansard, which is the equivalent of +our Congressional Record. You may find this description irreverent, but +do not think it is meant so. Do me the honor to get out your Bible and +look it over from this point of view!</p> + +<p>But, you say, if we die altogether when we finish this earthly life, +what becomes of moral responsibility and the punishment of sins? What +shall we say to the wicked man to make him be good, if we cannot reward +him with a heaven and frighten him with a hell? Well, my first answer is +that we have been trying this process for a couple of thousand years, +and the results seem to indicate that we might better seek out some +other method of inducing men to behave themselves. They do not believe +so completely in heaven and hell these days, but there were times in +history when they did believe completely, and not merely were the +believers just as cruel, they were just as treacherous and just as +gluttonous and just as drunken. If you want to satisfy yourself on this +point, I refer you to my book "The Profits of Religion," page 129.</p> + +<p>Now, as a matter of fact, I think I can discern the outlines of a system +of rewards and punishments automatically working in the life of men. I +am not sure that I can prove that the wicked always get punished and the +virtuous always rewarded; yet, when I stop and think, I am sure that I +would not care to change places with any of the wicked people that I +know in this world. Life may not always be "getting" them, but it has a +way of "getting" their descendants, and I could not be entirely happy if +I knew that my son and his sons were going to share the fate which I now +observe befalling, for example, the grand dukes of Russia and their +children. Life is one thing, and it does not exist for the individual, +but for the race; its causes and effects do not always manifest +themselves in one individual, but in a line of descendants. "Why are +they called dynasties?" asked one of my professors of history; and a +student brought the session to an end by answering: "Because that is +what they always seem to do!"</p> + +<p>But this is not perfect justice, you will argue. It is not perfect, from +the point of view of you or me; but then, I ask, what else is there in +the world that is perfect from that point<a name="vol_i_page_079" id="vol_i_page_079"></a> of view? Why should our +justice be any more perfect than, for example, our health or our +thinking or our climate or our government? And, may it not very well be +that our justice is up to us, in precisely the same way that some of +these other things are up to us? Maybe what we have to do is to set to +work to see to it that virtue does always get rewarded and vice does +always get punished, right here and now, instead of waiting for an +omnipotent God to attend to it in some hypothetical heaven.</p> + +<p>I find this life of mine very wonderful, and enormously interesting. I +am willing to take it on the terms that it is given, and to try to make +the best of it; and I do not see that I have any right to dictate what +shall be given me in some future life. If my father gives me a Christmas +present, I am happy and grateful; and, of course, if I know that he is +going to give me another present next Christmas, I am still more happy; +but I do not see that I have any right to argue that because he gives me +one Christmas present, he must give me an unlimited number of them, and +I think it would be very ungrateful of me to refuse to thank him for a +Christmas present until I had made sure that I was to get one next time!</p> + +<p>Neither do I find myself such a wonderful person that I can assert that +the morality of the universe absolutely depends upon the fact that I am +immortal. Of course, I should like to live forever, and to know all the +wonderful things that are going to happen in the world, and if it is +true that I am so to live, I shall be immensely delighted. But I cannot +say that it <i>must</i> be true, and all I can do is to investigate the +probabilities. On this point my view is stated in a sentence of +Spinoza's: "He who would love God rightly must not desire that God love +him in return."</p> + +<p>To sum up, the question of immortality is purely a question of fact. It +is one to be approached in a spirit of open-minded inquiry, entirely +unaffected by hopes or fears or dogmas or moral claims. It is worth +while to get clear that we may be immortal, even though we do not now +know it and cannot now prove it; it is possible that all psychic +research might end in telepathy, and still, when we die, we might wake +up and find ourselves alive. It might possibly be that some of us are +immortal and not all of us. It might be that some parts of us are +immortal and not the rest. It might be that our subconsciousness is +immortal and not our consciousness. It might<a name="vol_i_page_080" id="vol_i_page_080"></a> be that all of us, or some +part of us, survive for a time, but not forever. This last is something +which I myself am inclined to think may be the case.</p> + +<p>Also, it seems worthwhile to mention that it is no argument against +immortality that we cannot imagine it, that we cannot picture a universe +consisting of uncountable billions of living souls, or what these souls +would do to pass the time. It may very well be that among these souls +there is no such thing as time. It may be that they are thoroughly +occupied in ways beyond our imagining, or again, that they are not +occupied, and under no necessity of being occupied. Let the person who +presents such arguments begin by picturing to you how the brain cells +manage to store up the uncounted millions of memories which you have, +the thousands of words and combinations of words, and the thoughts which +go with them, musical notes and tunes, colors and odors and visual +impressions, memories of the past and hopes of the future and dreams +that never were. Where are all those hundreds of millions of things, and +what are they like when they are not in our consciousness, and how do +they pass the time, and where were they in the hundreds of millions of +years before we were born, and where will they be in the hundreds of +millions of years of the future? When our wise men can answer these +questions completely, it will be time enough for them to tell us about +the impossibility of immortality.<a name="vol_i_page_081" id="vol_i_page_081"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XV" id="CHAPTER_XV"></a>CHAPTER XV<br /><br /> +THE EVIDENCE FOR SURVIVAL</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the data of psychic research, and the proofs of +spiritism thus put before us.)</p></div> + +<p>Let us now take up the question of survival of personality after death +from the strictly scientific point of view; let us consider what facts +we have, and the indications they seem to give. First, we know that to +all appearances the consciousness and the subconsciousness are bound up +with the body. They grow with the body, they decline with the body, they +seem to die with the body. We can irretrievably damage the consciousness +by drawing a whiff of cyanogen gas into the lungs, or by sticking a pin +into the brain, or by clogging one of its tiny blood vessels with waste +matter. It is terrible to us to think that the mind of a great poet or +prophet or statesman may be snuffed out of existence in such a way; but +then, it is no argument against a fact to say that it is terrible. +Insanity is terrible, war is terrible, pestilence is terrible, so also +are tigers and poisonous snakes; but all these things exist, and all +these things have power over the wisest and greatest mind, to put an end +to its work on this earth at least.</p> + +<p>And now we come with the new instrument of psychic research, to probe +the question: What becomes of this consciousness when it disappears? Can +we prove that it is still in existence, and is able by any method to +communicate with us? Those who answer "Yes" argue that the mind of the +dead person, unable to use its own bodily machinery any longer, manages +in the hypnotic trance to use the bodily machinery of another person, +called a "medium," and by it to make some kind of record to identify +itself.</p> + +<p>This, of course, is a strange idea, and requires a good deal of proof. +The law of probability requires us not to accept an unlikely +explanation, if there is any more simple one which can account for the +facts. When we examine the product of automatic writing, table-tipping, +and other psychic phenomena, we have first to ask ourselves, Is there +anything in all this which <a name="vol_i_page_082" id="vol_i_page_082"></a>cannot be explained by what we already know? +Then, second, we have to ask, Is there any other supposition which will +explain the facts, and which is easier to believe than the spirit +theory?</p> + +<p>These "spirits" apparently desire to convince us of their reality, and +they tell us many things which are expected to convince us; they tell us +things which we ourselves do not know, and which spirits might know. But +here again we run up against the problem of the subconsciousness, with +its infinite mass of "forgotten" knowledge. It is not so easy for the +"spirits" to tell us things which we can be sure our subconscious mind +could not possibly contain. Also, there comes the additional element of +telepathy. It appears to be a fact that under trance conditions, or +under any especially exciting conditions of the consciousness, one mind +can reach out and take something out of another mind, or one mind can +cause something to be passed over to another mind; and so information +can be communicated to the mind of a medium, and can appear in automatic +writing, or in clairvoyance, or in crystal gazing.</p> + +<p>One of the most conscientious and earnest of all the investigators of +this subject was the late Professor Hyslop, who many years ago sought to +teach me "practical morality" (from the bourgeois point of view) in +Columbia University. Professor Hyslop worked for fifteen years with a +medium by the name of Mrs. Piper, who was apparently sincere and was +never exposed in any kind of fraud. In Professor Hyslop's books you will +find innumerable instances of amazing facts brought out in Mrs. Piper's +trances. You will find Professor Hyslop arguing that the only way +telepathy can account for these facts is by the supposition that there +is a universal subconscious mind, or that the subconscious mind of the +medium possesses the power to reach into the subconscious mind of every +other living person and take out anything from it. But for my part, I +cannot see that the case is quite so difficult. Professor Hyslop +recites, for example, how Mrs. Piper would tell him facts about some +long dead relative—facts which he did not know, but was later able to +verify. But that proves simply nothing at all, because there could be no +possible way for Professor Hyslop to be sure that he had never known +these facts about his relatives. The facts might have been in his +subconscious mind without having ever been in his conscious mind at all; +he might have<a name="vol_i_page_083" id="vol_i_page_083"></a> heard people talking about these matters while he was +reading a book, or playing as a boy, paying no attention to what was +said.</p> + +<p>And then came Sir Oliver Lodge with his investigations. I will say this +for his work—he was the first person who was able to make real to my +mind the startling idea that perhaps after all the dead might be alive +and able to communicate with us. You will find what he has to say in his +book, "The Survival of Man," and it seems fair that a great scientist +and a great man should have a chance to convince you of what seem to him +the most important facts in the world.</p> + +<p>Sir Oliver's son Raymond was killed in the war, and it is claimed that +he began at once to communicate with his family. Among other things, he +told them of the existence of a picture, which none of them had ever +seen or heard of, a group photograph which he described in detail. But, +of course, other people in this group knew of the existence of the +photograph, and so we have again the possibility that some member of Sir +Oliver's family may have taken into his subconscious mind without +knowing it an impression or description of that picture. If you care to +experiment, you will find that you can frequently play a part in the +dreams of a child by talking to it in its sleep; and that is only one of +a thousand different ways by which some member of a family might +acquire, without knowing it, information of the existence of a +photograph.</p> + +<p>There is another possibility to be considered—that a portion of the +consciousness may survive, and not necessarily forever. We are +accustomed when death takes place to see the body before us, and we know +that we can preserve the body for thousands of years if we wish. Why is +it not possible that when conscious life is brought to a sudden end, +there may remain some portion of the consciousness, or of the +subconsciousness, cut off from the body, and slowly fading back into the +universal mind energy, whatever we please to call it? There is a hard +part of the body, the skeleton, which survives for some time; why might +there not be a central core of the mind which is similarly tough and +enduring? Of course, if consciousness is a function of the brain, it +must decay as the brain decays; but how would it be if the brain were a +function of the consciousness—which is, so far as I can see, quite as +likely a guess.<a name="vol_i_page_084" id="vol_i_page_084"></a></p> + +<p>I find many facts which seem to indicate the plausibility of this idea. +I notice that in trance phenomena it is the spirits of those recently +dead which seem to manifest the most vitality. Of course, you can go to +any seance in the "white light" district of your city and receive +communications from the souls of Cæsar and Napoleon and Alexander the +Great and Pocahontas, and if the medium does not happen to be literary, +you can communicate with Hamlet and Don Quixote and Siegfried and +Achilles; but you will not find much reality about any of these people, +they will not tell you very much about the everyday details of their +lives. This fact that so much of what the "spirits" tell us is of our +own time tends to cast doubt on the idea that the dead survive forever. +How simple it would be to convince us, if the spirit of Sophocles would +come back to earth and tell us where to dig in order to find copies of +his lost tragedies! You would think that the soul of Sophocles, seeing +our great need of beauty and wisdom, would be interested to give us his +works! From genius, operating under the guidance of the conscious mind, +we get sublimity, majesty and power; but what the trance mediums give us +suggests, both in its moral and intellectual quality, the operation of +the subconscious. It is exactly like what we get, for example, from +dissociated personalities.</p> + +<p>There are, to be sure, the books of Patience Worth, produced by the +automatic writing of a lady in St. Louis, who tells us in evident good +faith that her conscious personality is entirely innocent of Patience, +and all her thought and doings. Patience writes long novels and dramas +in a quaint kind of old English, and the lady in St. Louis knows nothing +about this language. But does she positively know that when she was a +child, she never happened to be in the room with someone who was reading +old English aloud? Nothing seems more likely than that her subconscious +mind heard some quaint, strange language, and took possession of it, and +built up a personality around it, and even made a new language and a new +literature from that starting point.</p> + +<p>That is precisely the kind of thing in which the subconscious revels. It +creates new characters, with an imagination infinite and inexhaustible. +Who has not waked up and been astounded at the variety and reality of a +dream? Who has not told his dreams and laughed over them? The +subconscious will play at games, it will act and rehearse elaborate +rôles;<a name="vol_i_page_085" id="vol_i_page_085"></a> it will put on costumes, and delight in being Cæsar and Napoleon +and Alexander the Great and Pocahontas and Hamlet and Don Quixote and +Siegfried and Achilles. Yes, it will even play at being "spirits"! It +will be mischievous and impish; it will be swallowed up with a sense of +its own importance, taking an insolent delight in convincing the world's +most learned scientists of the fact that its play-acting is reality. It +will call itself "Raymond" to move and thrill a grief-stricken family; +it will call itself "Phinuit" and "Dr. Hodgson," and cause an earnest +professor of "practical morality" to give up a respectable position in +Columbia University and write books to convince the world that the dead +are sending him messages.</p> + +<p>Consider, for example, the multiple personality of Miss Beauchamp. +Remember that here we are not dealing with any guess work about +"spirits"; here we have half a dozen different "controls," none of them +the least bit dead, but all of them a part of the consciousness of one +entirely alive young lady. A specialist has spent some six years +investigating the case, day after day, week after week, writing down the +minute details of what happens. And now consider the miscreant known as +"Sally." Sally is just as real as any child whom you ever held in your +arms. Sally has love and hate, fear and hope, pain and delight—and +Sally is a little demon, created entirely out of the subconsciousness of +a highly refined and conscientious young college graduate of Boston. +Sally spends Miss Beauchamp's money on candy, and eats it; Sally pawns +Miss Beauchamp's watch and deliberately loses the ticket; Sally uses +Miss Beauchamp's lips and tongue to tell lies about Miss Beauchamp; +Sally strikes Miss Beauchamp dumb, or makes her hear exactly the +opposite of what is spoken to her. Yes, and Sally pleads and fights +frantically for her life; Sally enters into intrigues with other parts +of Miss Beauchamp, and for years deliberately fools Doctor Prince, who +is her Recording Angel and Heavenly Judge!</p> + +<p>And can anybody doubt that Sally could have fooled a grieving mother, +and made that mother think she was talking to the ghost of a long lost +child? Can anybody doubt that Sally could and would play the part of any +person she had ever known, or of any historic character she had ever +read about? And don't overlook the all-important fact that the conscious +Miss Beauchamp was absolutely innocent of all this,<a name="vol_i_page_086" id="vol_i_page_086"></a> and was horrified +when she was told about it. So here you have the following situation, no +matter of guesswork, but definitely established: your dearest friend may +act as a medium, and in all good faith may bring to the surface some +part of his or her subconsciousness, which masquerades before you in a +hundred different rôles, and plays upon you with deliberate malice the +most subtle and elaborate and cruel tricks.</p> + +<p>And how much worse the situation becomes when to this there is added the +possibility of conscious fraud! When the medium is a person who is +taking your money, and thrives by making you believe in the "spirits" +she produces! You may go to Lily Dale, in New York state, the home of +the Spiritualists, where they have a convention every summer, and in row +after row of tents you may hear, and even see, every kind of spirit you +ever dreamed of, ringing bells and shaking tambourines and dancing jigs. +And you may see poor farmers' wives, with tears streaming down their +cheeks, listening to the endearments of their dead children, and to +wisdom from the lips of Oliver Wendell Holmes speaking with a Bowery +accent. This kind of thing was exposed many years ago by Will Irwin in a +book called "The Medium Game"; and then—after traveling from one kind +of medium to another, and studying all their frauds, Irwin tells how he +went into a "parlor" on Sixth Avenue, and there by a fat old woman who +had never seen him before, was suddenly told the most intimate secrets +of his life!</p> + +<p>It has recently been announced that Thomas A. Edison is at work upon a +device to enable spirits to communicate with the living, if there really +are spirits seeking to do this. It is Edison's idea that spirits may +inhabit some kind of infinitely rarefied astral body, and he proposes to +manufacture an instrument which is sensitive to an impression many +millions of times fainter than anything the human body can feel. This +should make it easier for the spirits, and should constitute a fairer +test, possibly a decisive one. When that machine is perfected and put to +work by scientific men, I wish to suggest a few tests which will +convince me that there really are spirits, and that the results are not +to be explained by telepathy.</p> + +<p>First, assuming that the spirits live forever, there are some useful +things which were known to the people of ancient time, and are not known +to anyone living now. For example, let one of the Egyptian craftsmen +come forward and tell us<a name="vol_i_page_087" id="vol_i_page_087"></a> the secret of their glass-staining, which I +understand is now a lost art. And then Sophocles, as I have already +suggested, will tell us where we can find his lost dramas; or if he +doesn't know where any copies are buried, let him find in the spirit +world some scribe or librarian or book-lover who can give us this +priceless information. All over the ancient lands are buried and +forgotten cities, and in those cities are papyrus scrolls and graven +tablets and bricks. Infinite stores of knowledge are thus concealed from +us; and how simple for the ancient ones who possess this information to +make it known to us, and so to convince us of their reality!</p> + +<p>Or, again, supposing that spirits are not immortal, but that they slowly +fade from life as do their bodies. Suppose that a Raymond Lodge or other +recently dead soldier wishes to communicate with his father and to +convince his father that it is really an independent being, and not +simply a part of the father's subconscious mind—let him try something +like this. Let the father write six brief notes, and put them in six +envelopes all alike, and shuffle them up and put them in a hat and draw +out one of them. Now, assuming that the experimenter is honest, there is +no living human being who knows the contents of that envelope, and if +the medium is dipping into the subconscious mind of the experimenter, +the chances are one in six of the right note being hit upon. Assuming +that spirits may not be able to get inside an envelope and read a folded +letter, there is no objection to the experimenter, provided he is +honest, and provided there are no mirrors or other tricks, holding the +envelope behind his back, and tearing it open, and spreading it out for +the convenience of the spirit. And now, if the spirit can read that +letter correctly every time, we shall be fairly certain that whatever +force we are dealing with, it is not the subconscious mind of the +experimenter.</p> + +<p>Or, let us take another test. Let us have a roulette wheel in a covered +box, or hidden away so that no one but the spirit can see it. We spin +the wheel, and any one of the habitues of Monte Carlo can figure out the +chance of the little ball dropping into any particular number. If now +the spirit can tell us each time where we shall find the ball, we shall +know that we are dealing with knowledge which does not exist either in +the conscious or the subconscious mind of any living human being.<a name="vol_i_page_088" id="vol_i_page_088"></a></p> + +<p>Among the things that "spirits" have been accustomed to do, since the +days when they first made their appearance with the Fox sisters in +America, are the lifting of tables and the ringing of bells and the +assuming of visible forms. These are what is known as +"materializations," and when I was a boy, and used to hear people +talking about these things, there was always one test required: let the +materializations manifest themselves upon recording instruments +scientifically devised; let photographs be taken of them, let them be +weighed and measured, and so on. Well, time has moved forward, and these +tests have been met, and it appears that "materializations" are +facts—although it is still as uncertain as ever what they are +materializations of. An English scientist, Professor Crawford, has +published a book entitled "The Reality of Psychic Phenomena," in which +he tells the results of many years of testing materializations by the +strictest scientific methods. When the medium "levitates" a table—that +is, causes it to go up in the air without physical contact—it appears +that her own weight increases by exactly the weight of the table. When +she exerts any force, which apparently she can do at a distance, the +recording instruments show the exact counter-force in her own body.</p> + +<p>The results of these investigations are calculated at first to take your +breath away. It begins to appear that the theosophists may be right, and +that we may have one or more "astral" bodies within or coincident with +the physical body; and that under the trance conditions we mold and make +over this "astral" body in accordance with our imaginations, precisely +as a sculptor molds the clay. At any rate, our subconsciousness has the +power to project from it masses of substance, and to cause these to take +all kinds of forms, for example, human faces, which have been +photographed innumerable times. Or the body can shoot out long rods or +snaky projections, which lift tables, and exert force which has been +recorded upon pressure instruments and weighed by scales.</p> + +<p>As I write, a friend lends me a fifteen-dollar volume, a translation +just published of an elaborate work by Baron von Schrenck-Notzing, a +physician of Munich, giving minute details of four years' experiments in +this field. So rigid was this investigator in his efforts to exclude +fraud, that not merely was the medium stripped and sewed up in black +tights, but the "cabinet" in which she sat was a big sack of black +cloth,<a name="vol_i_page_089" id="vol_i_page_089"></a> everywhere sewed tight by machine. Every crevice of the medium's +body was searched before and after the tests, and every inch of the +"cabinet" gone over. The investigators sat within a couple of feet of +the medium, and would draw back the curtains, and while holding her +hands and her feet, would watch great masses of filmy gray and white +stuff exude from the medium's mouth, from her armpits and breasts and +sides. This would happen in red light of a hundred candle power, by +which print could be easily read; and the medium would herself +illuminate the phenomena with a red electric torch. The investigators +would be privileged to examine these "phantom" forms, to touch them +gently, and be touched by them—soft and slimy, like the tongue of an +animal; but sometimes the things would misbehave, and strike them in the +eye, hurting them.</p> + +<p>The medium, a young French girl living in the home of the wife of a +well-known French playwright, had begun with spiritualist ideas, but +came to take a matter-of-fact attitude to what happened, and in her +trances would labor to mold these emanations into hands or faces, as +requested by those present. She finally succeeded in allowing them to +separate the soft mucous stuff from her body, and keep it for chemical +and bacteriological examination. All this time she would be surrounded +by a battery of cameras, nine at once, some of them inside the cabinet; +and when the desired emanation was in sight, all these cameras would be +set off by flashlight, and in the book you have over two hundred such +photographs, showing faces and hands from every point of view. There are +even moving-pictures, showing the material coming out of her mouth and +going back!</p> + +<p>It is evident that we have here a whole universe of unexplored +phenomena; and it seems that many of the old-time superstitions which +were dumped overboard have now to be dragged back into the boat and +examined in the light of new knowledge. What could smack more of magic +and fraud than crystal-gazing? Yet it appears that the subconsciousness +has power to project an image of its hidden memories into a crystal +ball, where it may be plainly seen. We find so well-recognized an +authority as Dr. Morton Prince using this method to enable one of the +many Miss Beauchamps to recall incidents in her previous life which were +otherwise entirely lost to her. Likewise this exploration of the +disintegration of<a name="vol_i_page_090" id="vol_i_page_090"></a> personality enables us to watch in the making all the +phenomena of trance and ecstasy which have had so much to do with the +making of religions. We know now how Joan of Arc heard the "voices," and +we can make her hear more voices or make her stop hearing voices, as we +prefer. Also we know all about demons and "demoniac possession." We can +cast out demons—and without having to cause them to enter a herd of +swine! We may some day be prepared to investigate the wonder stories +which the Yogis tell us, about their ability to leave their physical +bodies in a trance, and to appear in England at a few moments' notice +for the transaction of their spiritual business!</p> + +<p>But we want things proven to us, and we don't want the people with whom +we work to be animated either by religious fanaticism or by money greed. +We are ready to unlimber our minds, and prepare for long journeys into +strange regions, but we want to move cautiously, and choose our route +carefully, and be sure we do not lose our way! We want to deal +rationally with life; we don't want to make wild guesses, or to choose a +complicated and unlikely solution when a simple one will suffice. But, +on the other hand, we must be alive to the danger of settling down on +our little pile of knowledge, and refusing to take the trouble to +investigate any more. That is a habit of learned men, I am sorry to say; +the law of inertia applies to the scientist, as well as to the objects +he studies. The scientists of our time have had to be prodded into +considering each new discovery about the subconscious mind, precisely as +the scientists of Galileo's time had to be prodded to watch him drop +weights from the tower of Pisa. When he told them that the earth moved +round the sun instead of the sun round the earth, they tortured him in a +dungeon to make him take it back, and he did so, but whispered to +himself, "And yet it moves." And it did move, of course, and continued +to move. And in exactly the same way, if it be true that we have these +hidden forces in us, they will continue to manifest themselves, and +masses of people will continue to flock to Lily Dale, and to pay out +their hard-earned money, until such a time as our learned men set to +work to find out the facts and tell us how we can utilize these forces +without the aid of either superstition or charlatanry.<a name="vol_i_page_091" id="vol_i_page_091"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XVI" id="CHAPTER_XVI"></a>CHAPTER XVI<br /><br /> +THE POWERS OF THE MIND</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Sets forth the fact that knowledge is freedom and ignorance is +slavery, and what science means to the people.)</p></div> + +<p>We have now completed a brief survey of the mind and its powers. +Whatever we may have proved or failed to prove, this much we may say +with assurance: the reader who has followed our brief sketch attentively +has been disabused of any idea he may have held that he knows it all; +and this is always the first step towards knowledge.</p> + +<p>The mind is the instrument whereby our race has lifted itself out of +beasthood. It is the instrument whereby we hold ourselves above the +forces which seek to drag us down, and whereby we shall lift ourselves +higher, if higher we are to go. How shall we protect this precious +instrument? How shall we complete our mastery of it? What are the laws +of the conduct of the mind?</p> + +<p>The process of the mind is one of groping outward after new facts, and +digesting and assimilating them, as the body gropes after and digests +and assimilates food. The senses bring us new impressions, and we take +these and analyze them, tear them into the parts which compose them, +compare them with previous sensations, recognize difference in things +which seem to be alike, and resemblances in things which seem to be +different; we classify them, and provide them with names, which are, as +it were, handles for the mind to grasp. Above all, we seek for causes; +those chains of events which make what we know as order in the world of +phenomena. And when the mind has what seems to be a cause, it proceeds +to test it according to methods it has worked out, the rules and +principles of experimental science.</p> + +<p>It is a comparatively small number of sensations which the body brings +to the mind of itself; it is a narrow world in which we should live if +our minds adopted a passive attitude toward life. But some minds possess +what we call curiosity; they set out upon their own impulse to explore +life; they discover new laws and make new experiences and new +sensations<a name="vol_i_page_092" id="vol_i_page_092"></a> for themselves. The mind forms an idea, and at first, after +the fashion of the ancient Greek philosophers, it glorifies that idea +and sets it in the seat of divinity. But presently comes the empirical +method, which refuses authority to any idea unless it can stand the test +of experiment, and prove that it corresponds with reality. Nowadays the +thinker amasses his facts, and forms a theory to explain them, and then +proceeds to try out this theory by the most rigid method that he or his +critics can devise. If the theory doesn't "work"—that is, if it doesn't +explain all the facts and stand all the tests—it is thrown away like a +worn-out shoe. So little by little a body of knowledge is built up which +is real knowledge; which will serve us in our daily lives, which we can +use as foundation-stones in the structure of our civilization.</p> + +<p>By this method of research man is expanding his universe beyond anything +that could have been conceived in the pre-scientific days. Hour by hour, +while we work and play and sleep, the mind of our race is discovering +new worlds in which our posterity will dwell. For uncounted ages man +walked upon the earth, surrounded by infinite swarms of bacterial life +of whose existence he never dreamed. The invisible rays of the spectrum +beat upon him, and he knew nothing of what they did to him, whether good +or evil. He lifted his head and saw vast universes of suns, in +comparison with which his world was a mere speck of dust; yet to him +these universes were globes or lanterns which some divinity had hung in +the sky.</p> + +<p>One of the most fascinating illustrations of how the mind runs ahead of +the senses is the story of the planet Uranus, which, less than two +hundred years ago, had never been beheld by the eye of man. A +mathematician seated in his study, working over the observations of +other planets, their motions in relation to their mass and distance, +discovered that their behavior was not as it should be. At certain times +none of them were in quite the right place, and he decided that this +variation must be due to the existence of an unknown body. He worked out +the problem of what must be the mass and the exact orbit of this body, +in order for it to be responsible for the variations observed; and when +he had completed these calculations, he announced to the astronomical +world, "Turn your telescopes to a certain spot in the heavens at a +certain minute of a certain night, and you will find a new planet of a +certain size." And so for the first time the human senses<a name="vol_i_page_093" id="vol_i_page_093"></a> became aware +of a fact, which by themselves they might not have discovered in all +eternity.</p> + +<p>Now, the importance of exact knowledge concerning a new planet may not +be apparent to the ordinary man; but if the thing which is discovered +is, for example, an unknown ray which will move an engine or destroy a +cancer, then we realize the worthwhileness of research, and the masters +of the world's commerce are willing to give here and there a pittance +for the increase of such knowledge. But men of science, who have by this +time come to a sense of their own dignity and importance, understand +that there is no knowledge about reality which is useless, no research +into nature which is wasted. You might say that to describe and classify +the fleas which inhabit the bodies of rats and ground-squirrels, and to +study under the microscope the bacteria which live in the blood of these +fleas—that this would be an occupation hardly worthy of the divinity +that is in man. But presently, as a result of this knowledge about fleas +and flea diseases being in existence and available, a bacteriologist +discovers the secret of the dread bubonic plague, which hundreds of +times in past history has wiped out a great part of the population of +Europe and Asia.</p> + +<p>Mark Twain tells in his "Connecticut Yankee" how his hero was able to +overcome the wizard Merlin, because he knew in advance of an eclipse of +the sun. And this was fiction, of course; but if you prefer fact, you +may read in the memoirs of Houdin, the French conjurer, how he was able +to bring the Arab tribes into subjection to the French government by +depriving the great chieftains of their strength. He gathered them into +a theatre, and invited their mighty men upon the stage, and there was an +iron weight, and they were able to lift it when Houdin permitted, and +not to lift it when he forbade. These noble barbarians had never heard +of the electro-magnet, and could not conceive of a force that could +operate through a solid wooden floor beneath their feet.</p> + +<p>Such things, trivial as they are, serve to illustrate the difference +between ignorance and knowledge, and the power which knowledge gives. +The man who knows is godlike to those who do not know; he may enslave +them, he may do what he pleases with their lives, and they are powerless +to help themselves. Anyone who would help them must begin by giving them +knowledge, real knowledge. There is no such thing as freedom without +knowledge, and it must be the best<a name="vol_i_page_094" id="vol_i_page_094"></a> knowledge, it must be new knowledge; +he who goes against new knowledge armed with old knowledge is like the +Chinese who went out to meet machine-guns with bows and arrows, and with +umbrellas over their heads.</p> + +<p>Once upon a time knowledge was the prerogative of kings and priests and +ruling castes; but this supreme power has been wrested from them, and +this is the greatest step in human progress so far taken. "Seek and ye +shall find," is the law concerning knowledge today. "Knock, and it shall +be opened unto you." In this, my Book of the Mind, I say to you that +knowledge is your priceless birthright, and that you should repudiate +all men and all institutions and all creeds and all formulas which seek +to keep this heritage from you. Beware of men who bid you believe +something because it is told you, or because your fathers believed it, +or because it is written in some ancient book, or embodied in some +ancient ceremonial. Break the chains of these venerable spells; and at +the same time beware of the modern spells which have been contrived to +replace them! Beware of party cries and shibboleths, the idols of the +forum, as Plato called them, the prejudices which are set as snares for +your feet. Beware of cant—that paraphernalia of noble sentiments, +artificially manufactured by politicians and newspapers for the purpose +of blinding you to their knaveries. Remember that you live in a world of +class conflicts; at every moment of your life your mind is besieged by +secret enemies, it is exposed to poison gas-clouds deliberately released +by people who seek to make use of you for purposes which are theirs and +not yours. In the fairy-tales we used to love, the hero was provided +with magic protection against the perils of those times; but what hero +and what magic will guard the modern man against the propaganda of +militarism, nationalism, and capitalist imperialism?</p> + +<p>The mind is like the body in that it can be trained, it can be taught +sound habits, its powers can be enormously increased. There are many +books on mind and memory training, some of which are useful, and some of +which are trash. There is an English system widely advertised, called +"Pelmanism," of which I have personally made no test, but it has won +endorsements of a great many people who do not give their endorsements +lightly.</p> + +<p>This is the subject of applied psychology, and just as in medicine, or +in law, or in any of the arts, there is a vast amount<a name="vol_i_page_095" id="vol_i_page_095"></a> of charlatanry, +but there is also genuine knowledge being patiently accumulated and +standardized. When the United States government had to have an army in a +hurry it did not make its millions of young men into teamsters or +aviators at random. It used the new methods of determining reaction +times, and testing the coordination of mind and body. Recently I visited +the Whittier Reform School in California, where delinquent boys are +educated by the state. A boy had been set to work in the tailor shop, +and it had been found that he was unable to make the buttons and the +buttonholes of a coat come in the right place. For nine years the state +of California, and before it the state of Georgia, had been laboring to +teach this boy to make buttons and buttonholes meet; the effort had cost +some five thousand dollars, to say nothing of all the coats which were +spoiled, and all the mental suffering of the victim and his teachers. +Finally someone persuaded the state of California to spend a few +thousand dollars and install a psychological bureau for the purpose of +testing all the inmates of the institution; so by a half hour's +examination the fact was developed that this boy was mentally defective. +Although he was eighteen years old in body, his mind was only eight +years old, and so he would never be able to achieve the feat of making +buttons and buttonholes meet.</p> + +<p>This is a new science which you may read about in Terman's "The +Measurement of Intelligence." By testing normal children, it is +established that certain tasks can be performed at certain ages. A child +of three can point to his eyes, his nose and his mouth; he can repeat a +sentence of six syllables, and repeat two digits, and give his family +name. Older children are asked to look at a picture and then tell what +they saw; to note omissions in a picture, to arrange blocks according to +their weight, to arrange words into sentences, to note absurdities in +statements, to count backwards, and to make change. Children of fifteen +are asked to interpret fables, to reverse the hands of a clock, and so +on. Of course there are always variations; every child will be better at +some kinds of tests than at others. But by having a wide variety, and +taking the average, you establish a "mental age" for the child—which +may be widely different from its physical age. You may find some whose +minds have stopped growing altogether, and can only be made to grow by +special methods of education. Enlightened communities are now conducting +separate<a name="vol_i_page_096" id="vol_i_page_096"></a> schools for defective children—replacing the old-fashioned +schoolmaster who wore out birch-rods trying to force poor little +wretches to learn what was beyond their power.</p> + +<p>In the same way psychology can be applied in industry, and in the +detection of crime. Here, too, there is a vast amount of "fake," but +also the beginning of a science. Our laws do not as yet permit the use +of automatic writing and the hypnotic trance in the investigation of +crime, but they have sometimes permitted some of the simpler tests, for +example, those of memory association. The examiner prepares a list of a +hundred names of objects, and reads those names one after another, and +asks the person he is investigating to name the first thing which is +suggested to him by each word in turn. "Engine" will suggest "steam," or +perhaps it will suggest "train"; "coat" will suggest "trousers," or +perhaps it will suggest "pocket," and so on. The examiner holds a +stop-watch, and notes what fraction of a second each one of these +reactions takes. The ordinary man, who is not trying to conceal +anything, will give all his associations promptly, and the reaction +times will be approximately alike. But suppose the man has just murdered +somebody with an axe, and buried the body in a cellar with a fire +shovel, and taken a pocketbook, and a watch, and a locket, and a number +of various objects, and climbed out of the cellar window by breaking the +glass; and now suppose that in his list of a hundred objects the +psychologist introduces unexpectedly a number of these things. In each +case the first memory association of the criminal will be one which he +does not wish to give. He will have to find another, and that inevitably +takes time. One or two such delays might be accidental; but if every +time there is any suggestion of the murder, or the method or scene of +the murder, there is noticed confusion and delay, you may be sure that +the conscious mind is interfering with the subconscious mind. The +difference between the conscious and the subconscious mind is always +possible to detect, and if you are permitted to be thorough in your +experiments, you can make certain what is in the subconscious mind that +the conscious mind is trying to conceal.</p> + +<p>Here, as everywhere in life, knowledge is power, and expert knowledge +confers mastery over the shrewdest untrained mind. The only trouble is +that under our present social system the trained mind is very apt to be +working in<a name="vol_i_page_097" id="vol_i_page_097"></a> the interest of class privilege. The psychologist who is +employed by a great corporation, or by a police department, may be as +little worthy of trust as a chemist who is engaged in making poison +gases to be used by capitalist imperialism for the extermination of its +rebellious slaves. But what this proves is not that scientific knowledge +is untrustworthy, but merely that the workers must acquire it, they must +have their own organizations and their own experiments in every field. +To give knowledge to the masses of mankind, slow and painful as the +process seems, is now the most important task confronting the +enlightened thinker.</p> + +<p>The method of psychoanalysis gives us also much insight into the +phenomena of genius, and the hope that we may ultimately come to +understand it. At present we are embarrassed because genius is so often +closely allied to eccentricity; the supernormal appears in connection +with the subnormal—and it is often hard to tell them apart. Great poets +and painters in revolt against a world of smug commercialism, adopt +irresponsibility as their religion; they live in a world of their own, +they dress like freaks, they refuse to pay their debts, or to be true to +their wives. They are followed by a host of disciples, who adopt the +defects of the master as a substitute for his qualities. And so there +grows up a perverted notion of what genius is, and wholly false +standards of artistic quality. There is nothing mankind needs more than +sure and exact tests of mental superiority; not merely the ability to +acquire languages and to solve mathematical equations, but the ability +to carry in the mind intense emotions, while at the same time shaping +and organizing them by the logical faculty, selecting masses of facts +and weaving them into a pattern calculated to awaken the emotion in +others. This is the last and greatest work of the human spirit, and to +select the men who can do it, and foster their activity, is the ultimate +purpose of all true science.<a name="vol_i_page_098" id="vol_i_page_098"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XVII" id="CHAPTER_XVII"></a>CHAPTER XVII<br /><br /> +THE CONDUCT OF THE MIND</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Concludes the Book of the Mind with a study of how to preserve and +develop its powers for the protection of our lives and the lives of +all men.)</p></div> + +<p>Someone wrote me the other day, asking, "When is the best time to +acquire knowledge?" I answer, "The time is now." It is easier to learn +things when you are young, but you cannot be young when you want to be, +and if you are old, the best time to acquire knowledge is when you are +old. It is true that the brain-cells seem to harden like the body, and +it is less easy for them to take on new impressions; but it can be done, +and just as Seneca began to learn Greek at eighty, I know several old +men whom the recent war has shaken out of their grooves of thought and +compelled to deal with modern ideas.</p> + +<p>But if you are young, then so much the better! Then the divine thrill of +curiosity is keenest; then your memory is fresh, and can be trained; +your mind is plastic, and you can form sound habits. You can teach +yourself to respect truth and to seek it, you can teach yourself +accuracy, open-mindedness, flexibility, persistence in the search for +understanding.</p> + +<p>First of all, I think, is accuracy. Learn to think straight! Let your +mind be as a sharp scalpel, penetrating unrealities and falsehoods, +cutting its way to the facts. When you set out to deal with a certain +subject, acquire mastery of it, so that you can say, "I know." And yet, +never be too sure that you know! Never be so sure, that you are not +willing to consider new facts, and to change your way of thinking if it +should be necessary. I look about me at the world, and see tigers and +serpents, dynamite and poison gas and forty-two centimeter shells—yet I +see nothing in the world so deadly to men as an error of the mind. Look +at the mental follies about you! Look at the prejudices, the delusions, +the lies deliberately maintained—and realize the waste of it all, the +pity of it all!</p> + +<p>Every man, it seems, has his pet delusions, which he hugs<a name="vol_i_page_099" id="vol_i_page_099"></a> to his bosom +and loves because they are his own. If you try to deprive him of those +delusions, it is as though you tore from a woman's arms the child she +has borne. I have written a book called "The Profits of Religion," and +never a week passes that there do not come to me letters from people who +tell me they have read this book with pleasure and profit, they are +grateful to me for teaching them so much about the follies and delusions +of mankind, and it is all right and all true, save for two or three +pages, in which I deal with the special hobby which happens to be their +hobby! What I say about all the other creeds is correct—but I fail to +understand that the Mormon religion is a dignified and inspired +religion, a gift from on high, and if only I would carefully study the +"Book of Mormon," I would realize my error! Or it is all right, except +what I say about the Christian Scientists, or the Theosophists, or +perhaps one particular sect of the Theosophists, who are different from +the others. Today there lies upon my desk a letter from a man who has +read many of my books, and now is grief-stricken because he must part +company from me; he discovers that I permit myself to speak +disrespectfully about the Seventh Day Adventist religion, whereas he is +prepared to show the marvels of biblical prophecy now achieving +themselves in the world. How could any save a divinely revealed religion +have foreseen the present movement to establish the Sabbath by law? Yes, +and presently I shall see the last atom of the prophecy fulfilled—there +will be a death penalty for failure to obey the Sabbath law!</p> + +<p>Cultivate the great and precious virtue of open-mindedness. Keep your +thinking free, not merely from outer compulsions, but from the more +deadly compulsions of its own making—from prejudices and superstitions. +The prejudices and superstitions of mankind are like those diseased +mental states which are discovered by the psychoanalyst; what he calls a +"complex" in the subconscious mind, a tangle or knot which is a center +of disturbance, and keeps the whole being in a state of confusion. Each +group of men, each sect or class, have their precious dogmas, their +shibboleths, their sacred words and stock phrases which set their whole +beings aflame with fanaticism. They have also their phobias, their words +of terror, which cannot be spoken in their presence without causing a +brain-storm.</p> + +<p>At present the dread word of our time is "Communist."<a name="vol_i_page_100" id="vol_i_page_100"></a></p> + +<p>You can scarcely say the word without someone telephoning for the +police. And yet, when you meet a Communist, what is he? A worn and +fragile student, who has thought out a way to make the world a better +place to live in, and whose crime is that he tells others about his +idea! Or perhaps you belong to the other side, and then your word of +terror is the word "Capitalist." You meet a Capitalist, and what do you +find? Very likely you find a man who is kindly, generous in his personal +impulses, but bewildered, possibly a little frightened, still more +irritated and made stubborn. So you realize that nearly all men are +better than the institutions and systems under which they live; you +realize the urgent need of applying your reasoning powers to the problem +of social reorganization.</p> + +<p>Cultivate also, in the affairs of your mind, the ancient virtue of +humility. There is an oldtime poem, which perhaps was in your school +readers, "Oh, why should the spirit of mortal be proud?" My answer is, +for innumerable reasons. The spirit of mortal should be proud and must +be proud because life throbs in it, and because life is a marvelous +thing, and the excitement of life is perpetual. Yesterday I met a young +mother; and of what avail is all the pessimism of poets against the +pride of a young mother? "Oh!" she cried, and her face lighted up with +delight. "He said 'Goo'!" Yes, he said "Goo!"—and never since the world +began had there been a baby which had achieved that marvel. Presently it +will be, "Look, look, he is trying to walk!" Then he will be getting +marks at school, and presently he will be displaying signs of genius. +Always it will take an effort of the mind of that young mother to +realize that there are other children in the world as wonderful as her +own; and perhaps it will take many generations of mental effort before +there will be young mothers capable of realizing that some other child +is more wonderful than her child.</p> + +<p>In other words, it is by a definite process of broadening our minds that +we come to realize the lives of others, to transfer to them the interest +we naturally take in our own lives, and to admit them to a state of +equality with ourselves. This is one of the services the mind must +render for us; it is the process of civilizing us. And there is another, +and yet more important task, which is to make clear to us the fact that +we do not altogether make this life of ours, that there is a universe of +power and wisdom which is not ours, but on which<a name="vol_i_page_101" id="vol_i_page_101"></a> we draw. "The fear of +the Lord is the beginning of wisdom," said the Psalmist. We know now +that fear is an ugly emotion, destructive to life; but it may be +purified and made into a true humility, which every thinking man must +feel towards life and its miracles.</p> + +<p>Also the man will have joy, because it is given him to share the high, +marvelous adventure of being. To the pleasures of the body there is a +limit, and it comes quickly; but the pleasures of the mind are infinite, +and no one who truly understands them can have a moment of boredom in +life. To a man who possesses the key to modern thought, who knows what +knowledge is and where to look for it, the life of the mind is a +panorama of delight perpetually unrolled before him. To the minds of our +ancestors there was one universe; but to our minds there are many +universes, and new ones continually discovered.</p> + +<p>The only question is, which one will you choose? Will you choose the +universe of outer space, the material world of infinity? Consider the +smallest insect that you can see, crawling upon the surface of the +earth; small as that insect is in relation to the earth, it is not so +small, by millions of times, as is the earth in relation to the universe +made visible to our eyes by the high-power telescope, plus the +photographic camera, plus the microscope. If you want to know the +miracles of this world of space, read Arrhenius' "The Life of the +Universe," or Simon Newcomb's "Sidelights on Astronomy." Suffice it here +to say that we have a chemistry of the stars, by means of the +spectroscope; that we can measure the speed and direction of stars by +the same means; that we have learned to measure the size of the stars, +and are studying stars which we cannot even see! And then along comes +Einstein, with his theories of "relativity," and makes it seem that we +have to revise a great part of this knowledge to allow for the fact that +not merely everything we look at, but also we ourselves, are flying +every which way through space!</p> + +<p>Or will you choose the universe of the atom, the infinity of the +material world followed the other way, so to speak? Big as is the +universe in relation to our world, and big as is our world in relation +to the insect that crawls on it, the insect is bigger yet in relation to +the molecules which compose its body; and these in turn are millions of +millions of times bigger than the atoms which compose them; and then, +behold, in the<a name="vol_i_page_102" id="vol_i_page_102"></a> atom there are millions of millions of electrons—tiny +particles of electric energy! We cannot see these infinitely minute +things, any more than we can see the electricity which runs our trolley +cars; but we can see their effects, and we can count and measure them, +and deal with them in complicated mathematical formulas, and be just as +certain of their existence as we are of the dust under our feet. If you +wish to explore this wonderland, read Duncan's "The New Knowledge," or +Dr. Henry Smith Williams' "Miracles of Science."</p> + +<p>Or will you choose the universe of the subconscious, our racial past +locked up in the secret chambers of our mind? Or will you choose the +universe of the superconscious, the infinity of genius manifested in the +arts? By the device of art man not merely creates new life, he tests it, +he weighs it and measures it, he tries experiments with it, as the +physicist with the molecule and the astronomer with light. He finds out +what works, and what does not work, and so develops his moral and +spiritual muscles, training himself for his task as maker of life.</p> + +<p>Written words can give but a feeble idea of the wonders that are found +in these enchanted regions of the mind. Here are palaces of splendor +beyond imagining, here are temples with sacred shrines, and +treasure-chambers full of gold and priceless jewels. Into these places +we enter as Aladdin in the ancient tale; we are the masters here, and +all that we see is ours. He who has once got access to it—he possesses +not merely the magic lamp, he possesses all the wonderful fairy +properties of all the tales of our childhood. His is the Tarnhelm and +the magic ring which gives him power over his foes; his is the sword +Excalibur which none can break, and the silver bullet which brings down +all game, and the flying carpet upon which to travel over the earth, and +the house made of ginger-bread, and the three wishes which always come +true, and the philter of love, and the elixir of youth, and the music of +the spheres, and—who knows, some day he may come upon heaven, with St. +Peter and his golden key, and the seraphim singing, and the happy blest +conversing!<a name="vol_i_page_103" id="vol_i_page_103"></a></p> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_104" id="vol_i_page_104"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="PART_TWO" id="PART_TWO"></a>PART TWO<br /><br /> +THE BOOK OF THE BODY</h2> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_105" id="vol_i_page_105"></a></p> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_106" id="vol_i_page_106"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XVIII" id="CHAPTER_XVIII"></a>CHAPTER XVIII<br /><br /> +THE UNITY OF THE BODY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the body as a whole, and shows that health is not a +matter of many different organs and functions, but is one problem +of one organism.)</p></div> + +<p>The reader who has followed our argument this far will understand that +we are seldom willing to think of the body as separate from the mind. +The body is a machine, to be sure, but it is a machine that has a +driver, and while it is possible for a sound machine to have a drunken +and irresponsible driver, such a machine is not apt to remain sound very +long. Frequently, when there is trouble with the machine, we find the +fault to be with the driver; in other words, we find that what is needed +for the body is a change in the mind.</p> + +<p>If you wish to have a sound body, and to keep it sound as long as +possible, the first problem for you to settle is what you want to make +of your life; you must have a purpose, and confront the tasks of life +with energy and interest. What is the use of talking about health to a +man who has no moral purpose? He may answer—indeed, I have heard +victims of alcoholism answer—"Let me alone. I have a right to go to +hell in my own way."</p> + +<p>I am aware, of course, that the opposite of the proposition is equally +true. A man cannot enjoy much mental health while he has a sick body. It +is a good deal like the old question, Which comes first, the hen or the +egg? The mind and the body are bound up together, and you may try to +deal with each by turn, but always you find yourself having to deal with +both. Most physicians have a tendency to overlook the mind, and +Christian Scientists make a religion of overlooking the body, and each +pays the penalty in greatly reduced effectiveness.</p> + +<p>My first criticism of medical science, as it exists today, is that it +has a tendency to concentrate upon organs and functions, and to overlook +the central unity of the system. You will find a doctor who specializes +in the stomach and its<a name="vol_i_page_107" id="vol_i_page_107"></a> diseases, and is apt to talk as if the stomach +were a thing that went around in the world all by itself. He will +discuss the question of what goes into your stomach, and overlook to +point out to you that your stomach is nourished by your blood-stream, +which is controlled by your nervous system, which in turn is controlled +by hope, by ambition, by love, by all the spiritual elements of your +being. A single pulse of anger or of fear may make more trouble with the +contents of your stomach than the doctor's pepsins and digestive +ferments can remedy in a week.</p> + +<p>Of course, you may do yourself some purely local injury, and so for a +time have a purely local problem. You may smash your finger, and that is +a problem of a finger; but neglect it for a few days, and let blood +poison set in, and you will be made aware that the human body is one +organism, and also that, in spite of any metaphysical theories you may +hold, your body does sometimes dominate and control your mind.</p> + +<p>Some one has said that the blood is the life; and certainly the blood is +both the symbol and the instrument of the body's unity. The blood +penetrates to all parts of the body and maintains and renews them. If +the blood is normal, the work of renewal does not often fail. If there +is a failure of renewal—that is, a disease—we shall generally find an +abnormal condition of the blood. The distribution of the blood is +controlled by the heart, a great four-chambered pump. One chamber drives +the blood to the lungs, a mass of fine porous membranes, where it comes +into contact with the air, and gives off the poisons which it has +accumulated in its course through the body, and takes up a fresh supply +of oxygen. By another chamber of the heart the blood is then sucked out +of the lungs, and by the next chamber it is driven to every corner of +the body. It takes to every cell of the body the protein materials which +are necessary for the body's renewal, and also the fuel materials which +are to be burned to supply the body's energy; also it takes some thirty +million millions of microscopic red corpuscles which are the carriers of +oxygen, and an even greater number of the white corpuscles, which are +the body's scavengers, its defenders from invasion by outside germs.</p> + +<p>There are certain outer portions of the body, such as nails and the +scales of the skin, which are dead matter, produced<a name="vol_i_page_108" id="vol_i_page_108"></a> by the body and +pushed out from it and no longer nourished by the blood. But all the +still living parts of the body are fed at every instant by the stream of +life. Each cell in the body takes the fuel which it needs for its +activities, and combines it with the oxygen brought by the red +corpuscles; and when the task of power-production has been achieved, the +cell puts back into the blood-stream, not merely the carbon dioxide, but +many complex chemical products—ammonia, uric acid, and the "fatigue +poisons," indol, phenol and skatol. The blood-stream bears these along, +and delivers some to the sweat glands to be thrown out, and some to the +kidneys, and the rest to the lungs.</p> + +<p>All of this complicated mass of activities is in normal health perfectly +regulated and timed by the nervous system. You lie down to sleep, and +your muscles rest, and the vital activities slow up, your heart beats +only faintly; but let something frighten you, and you sit up, and these +faculties leap into activity, your heart begins to pound, driving a +fresh supply of blood and vital energy. You jump up and run, and these +organs all set to work at top speed. If they did not do so, your muscles +would have no fresh energy; they would become paralyzed by the fatigue +poisons, and you would be, as we say, exhausted.</p> + +<p>All the rest of the body might be described as a shelter and accessory +to the life-giving blood-stream; all the rest is the blood-stream's +means of protecting itself and renewing itself. The stomach is to digest +and prepare new blood material, the teeth are to crush it and grind it, +the hands are to seize it, the eyes are to see it, the brain is to +figure out its whereabouts. Man, in his egotism, imagines his little +world as the center of the universe; but the wise old fellow who lives +somewhere deep in our subconsciousness and looks after the welfare of +our blood-stream—he has far better reason for believing that all our +consciousness and our personality exist for him!</p> + +<p>Now, disease is some failure of this blood-stream properly to renew +itself or properly to protect itself and its various subsidiary organs. +When you find yourself with a disease, you call in a doctor; and unless +this doctor is a modern and progressive man, he makes the mistake of +assuming that the disease is in the particular organ where it shows +itself. You have, let us say, "follicular tonsilitis." (These medical +men<a name="vol_i_page_109" id="vol_i_page_109"></a> have a love for long names, which have the effect of awing you, and +convincing you that you are in desperate need of attention.) Your throat +is sore, your tonsils are swollen and covered with white spots; so the +doctor hauls out his little black bag, and makes a swab of cotton and +dips it, say in lysol, and paints your tonsils. He knows by means of the +microscope that your tonsils are covered and filled with a mass of +foreign germs which are feeding upon them; also he knows that lysol +kills these germs, and he gives you a gargle for the same purpose, puts +you to bed, and gradually the swelling goes down, and he tells you that +he has cured you, and sends you a bill for services rendered. But maybe +the swelling does not go down; maybe it gets worse and you die. Then he +tells your family that nature was to blame. Nature is to blame for your +death, but it never occurs to anyone to ask what nature may have had to +do with your recovery.</p> + +<p>I do not know how many thousands of diseases medical science has now +classified. And for each separate disease there are complex formulas, +and your system is pumped full of various mineral and vegetable +substances which have been found to affect it in certain ways. Perhaps +you have a fever; then we give you a substance which reduces the +temperature of your blood-stream. It never occurs to us to reflect that +maybe nature has some purpose of her own in raising the temperature of +the blood; that this might be, so to speak, the heat of conflict, a +struggle she is waging to drive out invading germs; and that possibly it +would be better for the temperature to stay up until the battle is over. +Or maybe the heart is failing; then our medical man is so eager to get +something into the system that he cannot wait for the slow process of +the mouth and the stomach, he shoots some strychnine directly into the +blood-stream. It does not occur to him to reflect that maybe the heart +is slowing up because it is overloaded with fatigue poisons, of which it +cannot rid itself, and that the effect of stimulating it into fresh +activity will be to leave it more dangerously poisoned than before.</p> + +<p>We are dealing here with processes which our ancient mother nature has +been carrying on for a long time, and which she very thoroughly +understands. We ought, therefore, to be sure that we know what is the +final effect of our actions; more especially we ought to be sure that we +understand the cause of the evil, so that we may remove it, and<a name="vol_i_page_110" id="vol_i_page_110"></a> not +simply waste our time treating symptoms, putting plasters on a cancer. +This is the fundamental problem of health; and in order to make clear +what I mean, I am going to begin by telling a personal experience, a +test which I made of medical science some twelve or fourteen years ago, +in connection with one of the simplest and most external of the body's +problems—the hair. First I will tell you what medical science was able +to do for my hair, and second what I myself was able to do, when I put +my own wits to work on the problem.</p> + +<p>I had been overworking, and was in a badly run down condition. I was +having headaches, insomnia, ulcerated teeth, many symptoms of a general +breakdown; among these I noticed that my hair was coming out. I decided +that it was foolish to become bald before I was thirty, and that I would +take a little time off, and spend a little money and have my hair +attended to. I did not know where to go, but I wanted the best authority +available, so I wrote to the superintendent of the largest hospital in +New York, asking him for the name of a reliable specialist in diseases +of the scalp. The superintendent replied by referring me to a certain +physician, who was the hospital's "consulting dermatologist," and I went +to see this physician, whose home and office were just off Fifth Avenue.</p> + +<p>He examined my scalp, and told me that I had dandruff in my hair, and +that he would give me a prescription which would remove this dandruff +and cause my hair to stop falling out. He charged me ten dollars for the +visit, which in those days was more money than it is at present. Being +of an inquiring turn of mind, I tried to get my money's worth by +learning what there was to learn about the human hair. I questioned this +gentleman, and he told me that the hair is a dead substance, and that +its only life is in the root. He explained that barbers often persuade +people to have their hair singed, to keep it from falling out, and that +this was an utterly futile procedure, and likewise all shampooing and +massage, which only caused the hair to fall out more quickly. It was +better even not to wash the hair too often. All that was needed was a +mixture of chemicals to kill the dandruff germs; and so I had the +prescription put up at a drug store, and for a couple of years I +religiously used it according to order, and it had upon my hair +absolutely no effect whatever.<a name="vol_i_page_111" id="vol_i_page_111"></a></p> + +<p>So here was the best that medical science could do. But still, I did not +want to be bald, so I went among the health cranks—people who +experiment without license from the medical schools. Also, I +experimented upon myself, and now I know something about the human hair, +something entirely different from what the rich and successful +"consulting dermatologist" taught me, but which has kept me from +becoming entirely bald:</p> + +<p>First, the human hair is made by the body, and it is made, like +everything else in the body, out of the blood-stream. It is perfectly +true that the dandruff germ gets into the roots, and makes trouble, and +that the process of killing this germ can be helped by chemicals; but it +does not take a ten-dollar prescription, it only takes ten cents' worth +of borax and salt from the corner grocery. (Put a little into a saucer, +moisten it, rub it into the scalp, and wash it out again.) But +infinitely more important than this is the fact that healthy hair roots +are a product of healthy blood, and that unhealthy blood produces sick +hair roots, which cannot hold in the hair. Most important of all is the +fact that in order to make healthy hair roots the blood must flow fully +and freely to these hair roots; whereas I had been accustomed for many +hours every day of my life to clap around my scalp a tight band which +almost entirely stopped the circulation of the life-giving blood to my +sick hair roots. In other words, by wearing civilized hats, I was +literally starving my hair to death.</p> + +<p>As soon as I realized this I took off my civilized hat, and have never +worn one since. As a rule, I don't wear anything. On the few occasions +when I go into the city, I wear a soft cap. Now and then I experience +inconvenience from this—the elevator boy in some apartment house tells +me to come in by the delivery entrance, or the porter of a sleeping-car +will not let me in at all. I remember discussing these embarrassments +with Jack London, who went even further in his defiance of civilization, +and wore a soft shirt. It was his custom, he said, to knock down the +elevator boys and sleeping-car porters. I answered that that might be +all right for him, because he could do it; whereas I was reduced to the +painful expedient of explaining politely why I went about without the +customary symbols of my economic superiority.</p> + +<p>The "consulting dermatologist" had very solemnly and<a name="vol_i_page_112" id="vol_i_page_112"></a> elaborately warned +me concerning the danger of moving my hair too violently, and thus +causing it to come out; but now my investigations brought out the fact +that moving the hair, that is, massaging the scalp, increases the flow +of blood to the hair roots, and further increases resistance to disease. +As for causing the hair to fall out, I discovered that the more quickly +you cause a hair to fall out, the greater is the chance of your getting +another hair. If a hair is allowed to die in the root, it kills that +root forever, but if it is pulled out before it dies, the root will make +a new hair. Every "beauty parlor" specialist knows this; she knows that +if a hair is pulled, it grows back bigger and stronger than ever, and so +to pull out hair is the last thing you must do if you want to get rid of +hairs!</p> + +<p>I know a certain poet, who happens to have been well-endowed with +physical graces by our mother nature. He finds it worth while to +preserve them—they being accessory to those amorous experiences which +form so large a part of the theme of poetry. Anyhow, this poet values +his beautiful hair, and you will see him sitting in front of his +fireplace, reading a book, and meanwhile his fingers run here and there +over his head, and he grabs a bunch of hair and pulls and twists it. He +has cultivated this habit for many years, and as a result his hair is as +thick and heavy as the "fuzzy-wuzzies" of Kipling's poem. It is a +favorite sport of this poet to lure some rival poet into a contest. He +will mildly suggest that they take hold of each other's hair and have a +tug of war. The rival poet, all unsuspecting, will accept the challenge, +and my friend will proceed to haul him all over the place, to the +accompaniment of howls of anguish from the victim, and howls of glee +from the victor, who has, of course, a scalp as tough as a rhinoceros +hide.</p> + +<p>I am not a poet, and it is not important that I should be beautiful, and +I have been too busy to remember to pull my hair; but by giving up tight +hats, and by limiting the amount of my overworking, I have managed to +keep what hair I had left when the hair specialist had got through with +me. I tell this anecdote at the beginning of my discussion of health, +because it illustrates so well the factors which appear in every case of +disease, and which you must understand in seeking to remedy the trouble.</p> + +<p>We have a phrase which has come down to us from the<a name="vol_i_page_113" id="vol_i_page_113"></a> ancient Latins, +"vis medicatrix naturae," which means the healing power of nature. So +long ago men realized that it is our ancient mother who heals our +wounds, and not the physician. Out of this have grown the cults of +"nature cure" enthusiasts; and according to the fashion of men, they fly +to extremes just as unreasonable and as dangerous as those of the "pill +doctors" they are opposing. I have in mind a man who taught me probably +more than any other writer on health questions, and with whom I once +discussed the subject of typhoid, how it seemed to affect able-bodied +men in the prime of their physical being. This, of course, was contrary +to the theories of nature cure, and my friend had a simple way of +meeting the argument—he refused to believe it. He insisted that, as +with all other germ infections, it must be a question of bodily tone; no +germ could secure lodgment in the human body unless the body's condition +was reduced.</p> + +<p>"But how can you be sure of that?" I argued. "You know that if you go +into the jungle, you are not immune against the scorpion or the cobra or +the tiger. There is nothing in all nature that is safe against every +enemy. What possible right have you to assert that you are immune +against every enemy which can attack your blood-stream?"</p> + +<p>We shall find here, as we find nearly always, that the truth lies +somewhere between the extremes of two warring schools. Our race has been +existing for a long time in a certain environment, and its very +existence implies superiority to that environment. The weaklings, for +whom its hardships were too severe, were weeded out; hostile parasites +invaded their blood-stream and conquered and devoured them. But those +who survived were able to make in their blood-stream the substances +known as anti-bodies, the "opsonins," to help the white blood corpuscles +devour the germs. As the result of their victory, we carry those +anti-bodies in our system, which gives us immunity to those particular +diseases, or at any rate gives us the ability to have the diseases +without dying. Every time we go into a street car, we take into our +throat and lungs the germs of tuberculosis. Examination proves that we +carry around with us in our mouths the germs of all the common throat +and nose diseases, colds, bronchitis, tonsilitis. No matter what +precautions we might take, no matter if we were to gargle our throats +every few minutes, we could never get rid of such germs. And they<a name="vol_i_page_114" id="vol_i_page_114"></a> wage +continual war upon the body's defenses; they batter in vain upon the +gates of our sound health. But take us to some new environment to which +we are not accustomed; take us to Panama in the old days of yellow +fever, or take us to Africa, and let the tsetse fly bite us, and infect +us with "sleeping sickness." Here are germs to which our systems are not +accustomed; and before them we are as helpless as the ancient +knights-at-arms, who had conquered everything in sight, and ruled the +continent of Europe for many hundreds of years, but were wiped off the +earth by a chemist mixing gunpowder.</p> + +<p>In the Marquesas Islands, in the South Seas, there lived a beautiful and +happy race of savages, believed to have been descended, long ages ago, +from Aryan stock. From the point of view of physical perfection, they +were an ideal race, living a blissful outdoor life, which you may read +about in Melville's "Typee," and in O'Brien's "White Shadows in the +South Seas." This race conformed to all the requirements of the nature +enthusiast. They went practically naked, their houses were open all the +time, they lived on the abundant fruits of the earth. To be sure, they +were cannibals, but this was more a matter of religious ceremony than of +diet. They ate their war captives, but this was only after battle, and +not often enough to count, one way or the other, in matters of health. +They had lived for uncounted ages in perfect harmony with their +environment; they were happy and free; and certainly, if such a thing +were possible to human beings, they should have been proof against +germs. But a ship came to one of these islands, and put ashore a sailor +dying of tuberculosis, and in a few years four-fifths of the population +of this island had been wiped out by the disease. What tuberculosis left +were finished by syphilis and smallpox, and today the Marquesans are an +almost extinct race.</p> + +<p>But there is another side to the argument—and one more favorable to the +nature cure enthusiast. We civilized men, by soft living, by +self-indulgence and lack of exercise, may reduce the tone of our body +too far below the standard which our ancestors set for us; and then the +common disease germs get us, then we have colds, sore throats, +tuberculosis. The nature cure advocate is perfectly right in saying that +there is no use treating such diseases; the thing is to restore the body +to its former tone, so that we may be superior to our normal environment +and its strains.<a name="vol_i_page_115" id="vol_i_page_115"></a></p> + +<p>You know the poem of the "One Hoss Shay," which was so perfectly built +in every part that it ran for fifty years and then collapsed all at once +in a heap. But the human body is not built that way. It always has one +or more places which are weaker than the others, and which first show +the effects of strain. In one person it will take the form of dyspepsia, +in another it will be headaches, in another colds, in another decaying +teeth, in another hardening of the arteries or stiffening of the joints. +But whatever the symptoms may be, the fundamental cause is always the +same, an abnormal condition of the blood-stream, and a consequent +lowering of the body's tone. Therefore, studying any disease and its +cure, you have first the emergency question, are there any germs lodged +in the body, and if so, how can you destroy them? As part of the +problem, you have to ask whether your blood-stream is normal, and if +not, what are the methods by which you can make it normal and keep it +so? Also you have to ask, what are the reasons why your trouble +manifests itself in this or that particular organ? Is there some +weakness or defect there, and can the defect be remedied, or can your +habits be changed so as to reduce the strain on that organ? Are there +any measures you can take to increase the flow of blood to that organ, +and to promote its activity? In the study of your health, you will find +that circumstances differ, and the importance of one factor or the other +will vary; but you will seldom find any problem in which all these +factors do not enter, and you will seldom find an adequate remedy unless +you take all the factors into consideration.<a name="vol_i_page_116" id="vol_i_page_116"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XIX" id="CHAPTER_XIX"></a>CHAPTER XIX<br /><br /> +EXPERIMENTS IN DIET</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Narrates the author's adventures in search of health, and his +conclusions as to what to eat.)</p></div> + +<p>Students of the body assure us that every particle of matter which +composes it is changed in the course of seven years. It is obvious that +everything that is a part of the body has at some time to be taken in as +food; so the problem of our diet today is the problem of what our body +shall consist of seven years from now, and probably a great deal sooner.</p> + +<p>I begin this discussion by telling my own personal experiences with +food. I am not going to recommend my diet for anyone else; because one +of the first things I have to say about the subject is that every human +individual is a separate diet problem. But I am going to try to +establish a few principles for your guidance, and more especially to +point out the commonest mistakes. I tell about my own mistakes, because +it happens that I know them more intimately.</p> + +<p>I was brought up in the South, where it is the custom of people to give +a great deal of time and thought to the subject of eating. Among the +people I knew it was always taken for granted that there should be at +least one person in the kitchen devoting all her time to the preparing +of delicious things for the family to eat. This person was generally a +negress, and, needless to say, she knew nothing about the chemistry of +foods, nothing about their constituents or nutritive qualities. All she +knew was about their taste; she had been trained to prepare them in ways +that tasted best, and was continually being advised and exhorted and +sometimes scolded by the ladies of the family on this subject. At the +table the family and the guests never failed to talk about the food and +its taste, and not infrequently the cook would be behind the door +listening to their comments; or else she would wait until after the +meal, for the report which somebody would bring her.</p> + +<p>In addition to this, the ladies of the family were skilled in what is +called "fancy cooking." They did not bother with<a name="vol_i_page_117" id="vol_i_page_117"></a> the meats and +vegetables, but they mixed batter cakes, and made all kinds of elaborate +desserts, and exchanged these treasures and the recipes for them with +other ladies in the neighborhood. In addition to this, there were +certain periods of the week and of the year especially devoted to the +preparing and consuming of great quantities of foods. Once every seven +days the members of the family expressed their worship of their Creator +by eating twice as much as usual; and at another time they celebrated +the birth of their Redeemer by overeating systematically for a period of +two or three weeks. Needless to say, of course, the children brought up +in such an environment all had large appetites and large stomachs, and +their susceptibility to illness was recognized by the setting apart for +them of a whole classification of troubles—"children's diseases," they +were called. In addition to children's diseases, there were coughs and +colds and sore throats and pains in the stomach and constipation and +diarrhea, which the children shared with their adults.</p> + +<p>I had a little more than my share of all these troubles. Always a doctor +would be sent for, and always he was wise and impressive, and always I +was impressed. He gave me some pills or a bottle of liquid, a +teaspoonful every two hours, or something like that—I can hear the +teaspoon rattle in the glass as I write. I had a profound respect for +each and every one of those doctors. He was wisdom walking about in +trousers, and whenever he came, I knew that I was going to get well; and +I did, which proved the case completely.</p> + +<p>Then I grew up, and at the age of eighteen or nineteen became possessed +of a desire for knowledge, and took to reading and studying literally +every minute of the day and a good part of the night. I seldom let +myself go to sleep before two o'clock in the morning, and was always up +by seven and ready for work again. I did this for ten years or so, until +nature brought me to a complete stop. During these ten years I was a +regular experiment station in health; that is, I had every kind of +common ailment, and had it over and over again, so that I could try all +the ways of curing it, or failing to cure it, and keep on trying until I +was sure, one way or the other. I came recently upon a wonderful saying +by John Burroughs, which will be appreciated by every author. "This +writing is an unnatural business. It makes your head hot and your feet +cold, and it stops the digesting of your food."<a name="vol_i_page_118" id="vol_i_page_118"></a></p> + +<p>This trouble with my digestion began when I was writing my second novel, +camping out on a lonely island at the foot of Lake Ontario. I went to +see a doctor in a nearby town, and he talked learnedly about dyspepsia. +The cause of it, he said, was failure of the stomach to secrete enough +pepsin, and the remedy was to take artificial pepsin, obtained from the +stomach of a pig. He gave me this pig-pepsin in a bottle of red liquid, +and I religiously took some after each meal. It helped for a time; but +then I noticed that it helped less and less. I got so that a simple meal +of cold meat and boiled potatoes would stay in my stomach for hours, in +spite of any amount of the pig-pepsin; I would lie about in misery, +because I wanted to work, and my accursed stomach would not let me.</p> + +<p>All the time, of course, I was using my mind on this problem, groping +for causes. I found that the trouble was worse if I worked immediately +after eating. I found also that it was worse when I was writing books. +When I got sufficiently desperate, I would stop writing books and go off +on a hunting trip. I would tramp twenty miles a day over the mountains, +looking for deer, and I would come back at night too tired to think, and +in a week or two every trace of my trouble would be gone. So my life +regimen came to be—first the writing of a book, and then a hunting trip +to get over the effects of it. But as time went on, alas, I noticed that +the recuperation was more slow and less certain. The working times grew +shorter, and the hunting times grew longer, until finally I had got to a +point where I couldn't work at all; I would go to pieces in a few days +if I tried it. It was apparently the end of my stomach, and the end of +my sleeping, and the end of my writing books. My teeth were decaying, +not merely outside but inside; I would have abscesses, and most +frightful agonies to endure. I would lie awake all night, and it would +seem to me that I could feel my body going to pieces—an extremely +depressing sensation!</p> + +<p>I had been trying experiments all this time. I had been going to one +doctor after another, and had got to realize that the doctors only +treated symptoms; they treated the "diseases" when they appeared—but +nobody ever told you how to keep the "diseases" from appearing. Why +could there not be a doctor who would look you over thoroughly, and tell +you everything that was wrong with you, and how to set it right?<a name="vol_i_page_119" id="vol_i_page_119"></a> A +doctor who would tell you exactly how to live, so that you might keep +well all the time! I was studying economics, and becoming suspicious of +my fellow man; it occurred to me that possibly it might be embarrassing +to a doctor, if he cured all his patients, and taught them how to live, +so that none of them would ever have to come to him again. It occurred +to me that possibly this might be the reason why "preventive medicine," +constructive health work, was getting so little attention from the +medical fraternity.</p> + +<p>Two things that plagued me were headache and constipation, and they were +obviously related. For constipation, the world had one simple remedy; +you "took something" every night or every morning, and thought no more +about it. My stout and amiable grandmother had drunk a glass of Hunyadi +water every morning for the last thirty or forty years, and that she +finally died of "fatty degeneration of the heart" was not connected with +this in the mind of anyone who knew her. As for the headaches, people +would tell you this, that, and the other remedy, and I would try +them—that is, unless they happened to be drugs. I was getting more and +more shy of drugs. I had some blessed instinct which saved me from +stimulants and narcotics. I had never used tea, coffee, alcohol or +tobacco, and in my worst periods of suffering I never took to putting +myself to sleep with chloral, or to stopping my headaches with +phenacetin.</p> + +<p>At the end of six or eight years of purgatory, I came upon a prospectus +of the Battle Creek Sanitarium. This seemed to me exactly what I wanted; +this was constructive, it dealt with the body as a whole. So I spent a +couple of months at the "San," and paid them something like a thousand +dollars to tell me all they could about myself.</p> + +<p>The first thing they told me was that meat-eating was killing me. It was +perfectly obvious, was it not, that meat is a horrible feeding place for +germs, that rotten meat is dreadfully offensive, and likewise digested +meat—consider the excreta of cats, for example! I listened solemnly +while Doctor Kellogg read off the numbers of billions of bacteria per +gram in the contents of the colon of a carnivorous person. It certainly +seemed proper that the author of "The Jungle" should be a vegetarian, so +I became one, and did my best to persuade myself that I enjoyed the +taste of the patent meat-substitutes which are served in hundred calory +portions in the big Sanitarium dining-room.<a name="vol_i_page_120" id="vol_i_page_120"></a></p> + +<p>There also I met Horace Fletcher, and learned to chew every particle of +food thirty-two times, and often more. I exercised in the Sanitarium +gymnasium, and watched the sterilized dancing—the men with the men and +the women with the women. I was patiently polite with the Seventh Day +Adventist religion, and laid in a supply of postage stamps on Friday +evening. Finally, and most important of all, I went once a day to the +"treatment rooms," and had my abdomen doctored alternately with hot +cloths and ice. By this means I kept up a flow of blood in the +intestinal tract, and stimulated these organs to activity; so my +constipation was relieved, and my headaches were less severe—so long as +I stayed at the Sanitarium, and was boiled and frozen once every day. +But when I left the Sanitarium, and abandoned the treatments, the +troubles began to return. Meantime, however, I had written a book in +praise of vegetarianism—a book which has got into the libraries, and +cannot be got out again!</p> + +<p>I went on to a new variety of health crank, the real "nature cure" +practitioners. Vegetarianism was not enough, they insisted; the evil had +begun long before, when man first ruined his food and destroyed its +nutritive value by means of fire. There was only one certain road to +health, and that was by the raw food route, the monkey and squirrel +diet. I had gone out to California for a winter's rest, and decided I +would give this plan a thorough trial. For five months I lived by +myself, and the only cooked food I ate was shredded wheat biscuit. For +the rest I lived on nuts and salads and fresh and dried fruits; and +during this period I enjoyed such health as I had never known in my life +before. I had literally not a single ailment. I was not merely well, but +bubbling over with health. I had a friend who said it cheered him up +just to see me walk down the street.</p> + +<p>I thought that it was entirely the raw food, and that I had solved the +problem forever; but I overlooked the fact that during those five months +I had done no hard brain work, no writing. I went back to writing again, +and things began to go wrong; my wonderful raw foods took to making +trouble in my stomach—and I assure you that until you try, you have no +idea the amount of trouble that can be made in your stomach by a load of +bananas and soaked prunes which has gone wrong! For a year or two I +agonized; I could not give up my wonderful raw food diet, because I had +always before<a name="vol_i_page_121" id="vol_i_page_121"></a> me the vision of those months in California, and could +not understand why it was not that way again.</p> + +<p>But the time came when I would eat a meal of raw food, and for hours +afterwards my stomach would feel like a blown-up football. Then somebody +gave me a book by Dr. Salisbury on the subject of the meat diet. Of all +the horrible things in the world, a meat diet sounded to me the worst; I +had been a vegetable enthusiast for three years, and thought of eating +meat as you would think of cannibalism. But there has never been a time +in my life when I would not hear something new, and give it a trial if +it sounded well; so I read the books of Doctor Salisbury, which have +long been out of print, and have been curiously neglected by the medical +profession. Salisbury was a real pioneer, an experimenter. He wrote in +the days before the germ theory, and so missed his guess regarding +tuberculosis, but he perceived that most of the common diseases are +caused by dietetic errors, and he set to work to prove it. He showed +that hog cholera and army diarrhea are the same disease, and come from +the same cause. He took a squad of men and fed them on army biscuit for +two or three weeks, until they were nearly dead, and then he put them on +a diet of lean beef and completely cured them in a few days. He did this +same thing with one kind of food after another, and in each case he +would bring his men as near to death as he dared, and then he would cure +them. He showed that meat is the only food which contains all the +elements of nutrition, the only food upon which a person can live for an +unlimited period. As Salisbury said, "Beef is first, mutton is second, +and the rest nowhere."</p> + +<p>It was his idea that tuberculosis of the lungs is caused by spores of +fermenting starch clogging the minute blood vessels. He claimed that +there is an early stage of tuberculosis, in which the spores are +floating in the blood stream; he put large numbers of patients upon a +diet of lean beef, ground and cooked, and he cured them of tuberculosis, +and if one of them would break the diet and yield to a craving for +starch or sugar, Salisbury claimed that he could find it out an hour or +two later by examining a drop of their blood under the microscope. In +his books he described vividly the effects of an excess of starch and +sugar in the diet. He called it "making a yeast-pot of your stomach"; +and you can imagine how that hit my stomach, full of half digested +bananas and prunes!<a name="vol_i_page_122" id="vol_i_page_122"></a></p> + +<p>I tried the Salisbury diet, and satisfied myself of this one fact, that +lean meat is for brain-workers the most easily assimilated of all foods. +Salisbury claimed that you could not overeat on meat, but I do not +believe there is any food you cannot overeat on, nor do I believe that +anyone should try to live on one kind of food. We are by nature +omnivorous animals. Our digestive tracts are similar to those of hogs +and monkeys, which eat all varieties of food they can get. One of the +common errors of the nature cure enthusiast is to cite the monkey and +the squirrel as fruit and nut-eating animals, when the fact is that +monkeys and squirrels eat meat when they can get it, and the ardor with +which they go bird-nesting is evidence enough that they crave it. If +there is any race of man which is vegetarian, you will find that it is +from necessity alone. The beautiful South Sea Islanders, who are the +theme of the raw fooders' ecstasy, spend a lot of their time catching +fish, and sometimes they kill a pig, and celebrate the event precisely +as Christians celebrate the birth of their Redeemer.</p> + +<p>From this you may be able to guess my conclusions, as the result of much +painful blundering and experimenting. So far as diet is concerned, I +belong to no school; I have learned something from each one, and what I +have learned from a trial of them all is to be shy of extreme statements +and of hard and fast rules. To my vegetarian friends who argue that it +is morally wrong to take sentient life, I answer that they cannot go for +a walk in the country without committing that offense, for they walk on +innumerable bugs and worms. We cannot live without asserting our right +to subject the lower forms of life to our purposes; we kill innumerable +germs when we swallow a glass of grape juice, or for that matter a glass +of plain water. I shall be much surprised if the advance of science does +not some day prove to us that there are rudimentary forms of +consciousness in all vegetable life; so we shall justify the argument of +Mr. Dooley, who said, in reviewing "The Jungle," that he could not see +how it was any less a crime to cut off a young tomato in its prime, or +to murder a whole cradleful of baby peas in the pod!</p> + +<p>There is no question that meat-eating is inconvenient, expensive, and +dirty. I have no doubt that some day we shall know enough to be able to +find for every individual a diet<a name="vol_i_page_123" id="vol_i_page_123"></a> which will keep him at the top of his +power, without the maintenance of the slaughter-house. But we do not +possess that knowledge at present; at least, I personally do not possess +it. I happen to be one of those individuals—there are many of +them—with whom milk does not agree; and if you rule out milk and meat, +you find yourself compelled to get a great deal of your protein from +vegetable sources, such as peas, beans and nuts. All these contain a +great deal of starch, and thus there is no way you can arrange your diet +to escape an excess of starch. Excess of starch, so my experience has +convinced me, is the deadliest of all dietetic errors. It is also the +commonest of errors, the cause, not merely of the common throat and nose +infections, but of constipation, and likewise of diarrhea, of anemia, +and thus, through the weakening of the blood stream, of all disorders +that spring from this source—decaying teeth and rheumatism, boils, bad +complexion, and tuberculosis. Starch foods are the cheapest, therefore +they form the common diet of the poor, and are responsible for the +diseases of undernourishment to which the poor are liable.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, of course, there are perfectly definite diseases of +overnourishment; high blood pressure, which culminates in apoplexy; +kidney troubles, which result from the inability of these organs to +eliminate all the waste matter that is delivered to them; fatty +degeneration of the heart, or of the liver, or any of the vital organs. +You may cause a headache by clogging the blood stream through +overeating, or you may cause it by eating small quantities of food, if +those foods are unbalanced, and do not contain the mineral elements +necessary to the making of normal blood. Whatever the trouble with your +health, it is my judgment that in two cases out of three you will find +it dates back to errors in diet. I do not think I exaggerate in saying +that a knowledge of what to eat and how much to eat is two-thirds of the +knowledge of how to keep yourself in permanent health.<a name="vol_i_page_124" id="vol_i_page_124"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XX" id="CHAPTER_XX"></a>CHAPTER XX<br /><br /> +ERRORS IN DIET</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the different kinds of foods, and the part they play in +the making of health and disease.)</p></div> + +<p>It is my purpose in this chapter to lay down a few general principles to +aid you in the practical problem of selecting the best diet for +yourself. But it must be made clear at the outset that there can be no +hard and fast rule. All human bodies are more or less alike, but on the +other hand all are more or less different. Modern civilization has given +very few bodies the chance to be perfect; nearly all have some weakness, +some abnormality, and need some special modification in diet to fit +their particular problem. The ideal in each case would be a complete +study of the individual system. Some day, no doubt, medical science will +analyze the digestive juices and the gland secretions and the +blood-stream of every human being, and say, you need a certain +percentage of starch and a certain percentage of protein; you need such +and such proportion of phosphorus and iron; you should avoid certain +acids—and so on. But at present we are devoting our science to the task +of killing and maiming other people, instead of enabling ourselves to +live in health and happiness; so it is that most of those who read this +book will be too poor to command the advice of a diet specialist. The +best you can do is to get a few general ideas and try them out, watching +your own body and learning its peculiarities.</p> + +<p>Human food contains three elements: proteins, fats and carbohydrates. +The proteins are the body-building material, and the foods which are +rich in proteins are lean meat, the white of eggs, milk and cheese, +nuts, peas and beans. A certain amount of this kind of food is needed by +the body. If it is missing, the body will gradually waste away. If too +much of it is taken, the body can turn it into energy-making material, +but this is a wasteful process, and the best evidence appears to be that +it is a strain upon the system. Experiments conducted by Professor +Chittenden of Yale have proven conclusively that men can live and +maintain body weight upon<a name="vol_i_page_125" id="vol_i_page_125"></a> much less protein food than previous dietetic +standards had indicated.</p> + +<p>The fats are found in fat meats and dairy products, and in nuts, olives, +and vegetable oils. The body is prepared to digest and assimilate a +certain amount of fat, no one knows how much. I have found in my own +case that I require a great deal less than people ordinarily eat. I have +for many years maintained good health upon a diet containing no more fat +than one gets with lean meat once or twice a day. I never use butter or +olive oil, nor any fat in cooking. My reason for this is that fats are +the most highly concentrated form of food, and the easiest upon which to +overeat. Excess of fat is a cause, not merely of obesity, but also of +boils and pimples and "pasty" complexion, and other signs of a clogged +blood-stream.</p> + +<p>The third variety of food is the carbohydrates, and of these there are +two kinds, starches and sugars. Starch is the white material of the +grains and tubers; the principal food element of bread and cereals, +rice, potatoes, bananas, and many prepared substances such as +corn-starch, tapioca, farina and macaroni. Starchy foods compose +probably half the diet of the average human being. In my own case, they +compose about one-sixth, so you see to what extent my beliefs differ +from the common. Starch is not really necessary in the diet at all. I +have a friend who is subject to headaches, and finds relief from them by +a diet of meat, salads, and fresh fruits exclusively. The first thing +that excess of starch or sugar does is to ferment in the system, and +cause flatulence and gas. But strange as it may seem, if the excess of +starch is perfectly digested and assimilated into the system, the +condition may be worse yet, because you may have a great quantity of +energy-producing material, without the necessary mineral elements which +the body requires in the handling of it.</p> + +<p>If you cremate a human body and study the ashes chemically, you find a +score or more of mineral salts. You find these in the blood, and no +blood is normal and no body can be kept normal which does not contain +the right percentage of these elements. It is not merely that they are +needed to build bones and teeth; they are needed at every instant for +the chemistry of the cells. Every time you move a muscle, you fill the +cells of that muscle with a certain amount of waste matter. You may +prove how deadly this matter is by binding<a name="vol_i_page_126" id="vol_i_page_126"></a> a tight cord about your arm, +and then trying to use the arm. We are only at the beginning of +understanding the subtle chemistry of the body; but this much we know, +the cells transform the waste products, and they are thrown out of the +system as ammonia, uric acid, etc.; and for this process the blood must +have a continual supply of many mineral salts.</p> + +<p>So vital are they, and so fatal to health is their absence, that it is +far better for you to eat nothing at all than to eat improperly balanced +foods, or foods which are deficient in the organic salts. You may prove +this to yourself by a simple experiment. Put two chickens in separate +pens, where nobody can feed them but yourself. Feed one of them on water +and white bread, or corn starch, or sugar, or any energy-making +substance which contains little of the mineral elements. Feed the other +chicken on plain water. You will find that the one which has the food +will quickly become droopy and sickly; its feathers will fall out, it +will have what in human beings would be known as headaches, colds, sore +throats, decaying teeth and boils. At the end of a couple of weeks it +will be a dead chicken. The one which you feed on water alone will not +be a happy chicken, neither will it be a fat chicken, but it will be a +live chicken, and a chicken without disease. I am going later on to +discuss the subject of fasting. For the present I will merely say that a +chicken which has nothing but water is living upon its own flesh, and +therefore has a meat diet, containing the mineral elements necessary to +the elimination of the fatigue poisons.</p> + +<p>I am going to try not to be dogmatic in this book, and not to say things +that I do not know. I confess to innumerable uncertainties about the +subject of diet; but one thing I think I do know, and that is that human +beings should eliminate absolutely from their food those modern +artificial products, which look so nice, and are so easy to handle, and +are put up in packages with pretty labels, and have been in some way +artificially treated to remove the wastes and impurities—including the +vital mineral salts. Among such food substances I include lard and its +imitations made from cottonseed oil, white flour, all the prepared and +refined cereals, polished rice, tapioca, farina, corn starch, and +granulated and powdered sugar. Any of these substances will kill a +chicken in a couple of weeks, and the only reason they take a longer +time to kill<a name="vol_i_page_127" id="vol_i_page_127"></a> you is because you mix them with other kinds of foods. But +to the extent that you eat them, your diet is deficient; and do not +console yourself with the idea that the mineral elements will be made up +from other foods, because you don't know that, and nobody else knows it. +Nobody knows just how much of any particular organic salt the body +needs. All we know is that the primitive races, which ate natural foods, +enjoyed vigorous health, while the American people, who consume the +greatest proportion of the so-called "refined" foods, have the very best +dentists and the very worst teeth in the world.</p> + +<p>There are many kinds of sugar, found in the sugar-cane and the beet, and +in all fruits. Sugar may also be made from any form of starch; this is +glucose, which is put up in cans and sold as an imitation of maple +syrup. The ordinary granulated and powdered sugar is made by taking from +the natural syrup every trace of mineral elements; so I have no +hesitation in saying that the ordinary cane sugar and beet sugar of our +breakfast tables and our confectionery stores is not a food, but a slow +poison. The causes of the wonderful progress of American dentistry, +which is the marvel of the civilized world, are cane sugar, white flour, +and the frying-pan, each of which dietetic crimes I shall take up in +turn.</p> + +<p>We have the richest country in the world; we eat more food, probably by +50 per cent, and we waste more food, probably by 500 per cent, than any +other people in the world; and yet, go to any small farming community in +America, and what do you find? You find the teeth of the young children +rotting in their heads, and having to be pulled out before their second +teeth come. You find these second teeth rotting often before the age of +twenty. A friend of mine, who knows the American farmer, sums it up this +way: "He has two things that he requires if he is to be really +respectable and happy. First, he wants to get all the fireplaces in his +home boarded up, and all the windows nailed tight; and second, he wants +to get all his teeth out, and an artificial set installed. Out of the +farmers' wives in my neighborhood, not one in ten keeps her own teeth +until she is thirty."</p> + +<p>If you go to the Balkans, where the peasants live on sour milk, with +grains which they grind at home; or to southern Italy and Sicily, where +they live on cheese and black bread and olives; or among savage people, +where they hunt and<a name="vol_i_page_128" id="vol_i_page_128"></a> fish and gather the natural fruits, you find old +men without a single decayed tooth. There must be some reason for this, +and the reason is found in our denatured grocery-store foods. The +farmer's wife will gather up her eggs and her butter and cheeses, and +take them to the store and bring back cans of lard and packages of +sugar. The farmer will sell his perfectly good wheat and corn meal, and +bring back in his wagon cases of "refined" cereal foods, for which he +has paid ten times the price of the grain!</p> + +<p>Dentists will tell you that the way candy injures the teeth is by +sticking to them and fermenting, forming acids, which destroy the tooth +structure. And that may be a part of the reason. But the principal +reason why the teeth decay is because the blood-stream is abnormal, and +is unable to keep up the repairs of the body. Your teeth are living +structures, just as much as any other part of you, and they will resist +decay if you supply them with the proper nourishment.</p> + +<p>You need sugar; you need a considerable quantity of it every day. Nature +provides this sugar in combination with the organic salts, and also with +the precious vitamines, whose function in the body we are only beginning +to investigate. All the mineral substances which give the color and +flavor to oranges, apples, peaches, grapes, figs, prunes, raisins—all +these you take out when you make sugar. Or perhaps you put in some +imitations of them, made from coal tar chemicals, and drink them at your +soda fountains! So little appreciation has the American farmer's wife of +natural fruits, that when she preserves them, she considers it necessary +to fill them full of cane sugar; in fact, she has a notion that they +won't keep unless she cooks them up with sugar! So snobbish are we +Americans about our eating, that we make the best of our foods into +bywords. We make jokes in our comic papers about the "boarding-house +prune"; and yet prunes and raisins are among the wholesomest foods we +have, and if we fed them to our children instead of cakes and candy and +coal-tar flavorings, our dental industry would rapidly decline.</p> + +<p>And the same thing is true of bread. When I was a boy, I thought I had +to have hot bread at least twice a day, and if I were called upon to eat +bread that was more than a day old, I felt that I was being badly abused +by life. I used to read fairy stories, in which something called "black +bread" was mentioned, something obscure and terrible; the symbol of<a name="vol_i_page_129" id="vol_i_page_129"></a> +human misery was Cinderella sitting in the ashes and eating a crust of +dry "black bread." But now since I have studied diet, I have taken my +place with Cinderella. I can afford to buy whatever kind of bread I +want; I can have the best white bread, piping hot, three times a day, if +I want it; but what I eat three times a day is a crust of hard dry +"black bread."</p> + +<p>"Black bread" is the fairy story name for bread made of the whole grain. +It is eaten that way by the peasant because he has no patent milling +machinery at his disposal, to fan away the life-giving elements of his +food. Nearly all the mineral elements of the grain are contained in the +outer, dark-colored portion. The white part is almost pure starch; and +when you use white flour, you are not merely starving your blood-stream, +your bones, and your teeth, you are also depriving the digestive tract +of the rough material which it is accustomed to handle, and which it +needs to stimulate it to action. I am aware that whole grain products +are a trifle less easy of digestion, but we should not pamper and weaken +our digestive tract any more than we let our muscles get flabby for lack +of action. We should require our stomachs to handle the ordinary natural +foods, precisely as we accustom our body to react from cold water, and +to stand honest hard work.</p> + +<p>For ages the Japanese peasants have lived on rice, with a little dried +fish. Quite recently there began to spread throughout Japan a mysterious +disease known as beri-beri. It was especially prevalent in the army, and +so the scientists of Japan set out to discover the cause, and it proved +to be the modern practice of polishing rice, which takes off the outer +coating of the grain. Rice is one of the most wholesome of foods, if it +is eaten in the natural state; but in order to get it in that state in +this country, you have to find a special food store of the health +cranks, and have to pay a special price for it. You have to pay a higher +price for whole wheat bread—because ninety-nine people out of a hundred +are ignorant, and insist upon having their foodstuffs pretty to look at!</p> + +<p>Probably you have read sea stories, and know of the horrors of scurvy. +Scurvy and beri-beri are similar diseases, with a similar cause. The men +on the old sailing ships used to have to live on white biscuit and salt +meat, and they always knew that to recover from their gnawing illness, +they must get to port and get fresh vegetables and fruits, especially<a name="vol_i_page_130" id="vol_i_page_130"></a> +onions and lemons, which contain the vitamines as well as the salts. But +you will see the modern housewife going into the grocery store, and +surveying the shelves of "package" goods, and in her ignorance picking +out the scurvy-making products, and frequently paying for them a much +higher price than for the health-making ones!</p> + +<p>Then, when she has got her white flour, and her cane sugar, and her +lard, she will take it home, and mix it up, and put it in the frying +pan, and serve it hot to her husband and children. Nature has so +constituted her husband and children that they digest starch before they +digest fat; that is to say, the starch is digested mainly in the +stomach, while the fat is digested mainly after the food has been passed +on into the small intestine. But by frying the starch before it is +eaten, the housewife carefully takes each grain of the starch and +protects it with a little covering of fat. Thus the digestive juices of +the stomach cannot get at the starch, and the starch goes down into the +small intestine a good part undigested. If some evil spirit, wishing to +make trouble for the human organism, had charge of the laying out of our +diet, he could hardly devise anything worse than that. And yet it would +be no exaggeration to say that the average American, especially the +average farmer, eats out of a frying-pan. If his potatoes have to be +warmed over, they go into the frying-pan; his precious batter-cakes and +doughnuts are cooked in a frying-pan, and all his precious hot breads +are mixed with lard. If it were not for the fact that you cannot broil a +beefsteak over a modern gas range, I would tell you that the first step +toward health for the average American would be to throw the frying-pan +out of the window, and to throw the cook-book after it.</p> + +<p>The whole modern art of cooking is largely a perversion; a product of +idleness, vanity, and sensuality. It is one of the monstrous growths +consequent upon our system of class exploitation. We have a number of +idle people with nothing to do but eat, and who demonstrate their +superiority to the rest of us by their knowledge of superior foods, and +superior ways of preparing them. They have the wealth of the world at +their disposal, also the services of their fellow man without limit, and +they set their fellow man to work to enable them to give elaborate +banquets, and to sit in solemn state and gorge themselves, and to have a +full account of their behavior<a name="vol_i_page_131" id="vol_i_page_131"></a> published in the next morning's +newspapers. A great part of this perverse art we owe to what is called +the "ancient régime" in France—a régime which starved the French +peasantry until they were black skinned beasts hiding in caves and +hollow trees. So it comes about that our modern food depravity parades +itself in French names, and American snobbery requires of its devotees a +course in the French language sufficient to read a menu card. Needless +to say, this elaborate gastronomic art has been developed without any +relation to health, or any thought of the true needs of the body. It is +one of the products of the predatory system which we can say is absolute +waste. Having done my own cooking for the past twenty-five years, I make +bold to say that I can teach anybody all he needs to know about cooking +in one lesson of half an hour, and that the total amount of cooking +required for a large family can be done by one person in twenty minutes +a day.</p> + +<p>In the first place, a great many foods do not have to be cooked at all, +and are made less fit by cooking. In the next place, the only cooking +that is ever required is a little boiling, or in the case of meat, +roasting or broiling. In the next place, the art of combining foods in +cooking is a waste art, because no foods should be combined in cooking. +Every food has its own natural flavor, which is lost in combination, and +if anybody is unable to enjoy the natural flavors of simply cooked +foods, there is one thing to say to that person, and that is to wait +until he is hungry. Let him take a ten-mile walk in the open air, and he +will have more interest in his next meal. I am not a fanatic, and have +no desire to destroy the pleasures of life; I am recommending to people +that they should seek the higher pleasures of the intellect, and those +pleasures are not found in standing over a cook stove, nor in compelling +others to stand over a cook stove. Moreover, I know that the artificial +mixing of foods to tempt peoples' palates is one of the principal causes +of overeating, and therefore of ill health, and therefore of the +ultimate destruction of the pleasures of life.</p> + +<p>I went out from the world of cooks before I was twenty. I wanted to +write a book, and to be let alone while I was doing it. I lived by +myself, and found out about cooking by practical experience. On a few +occasions since then, I have lived in a house with a servant, and had +some cooking done<a name="vol_i_page_132" id="vol_i_page_132"></a> for me, but it was always because somebody else +wanted it, and against my protest. In the last ten years we have had no +servant in our home, and because I want my wife to give her energy to +more important things than feeding me, I do my share of getting every +meal. We have worked out a system of housekeeping by which we get a meal +in five minutes, and when we finish it, it takes three minutes to clear +things away.</p> + +<p>If I tell you what I eat, please do not get the impression that I am +advising you to eat these same things. My diet consists of the foods +which I have found by long experience agree with me. There are many +other foods which are just as wholesome, but which I do not eat, either +because they don't happen to agree with me, or because I don't care for +them so much. I am fond of fruit, and eat more of that than of anything +else. It is not a cheap article of diet, but you can save a good deal if +you buy it in quantities, as I do. A little later I am going to discuss +the prices of foods.</p> + +<p>For breakfast I eat a slice of whole wheat bread, three good-sized +apples, stewed, and eight or ten dates. It takes practically no time to +prepare this breakfast. The bread has to be baked, of course, but this +is done wholesale; we buy four loaves at a time, and it is just as good +at the end of a couple of weeks as when we buy it. When I lived in the +world of cooks, I would call for apple sauce; which meant that somebody +had to pare apples, cut them up, stew them, mix them with sugar, grate a +little nutmeg over them, set them on ice, and serve them to me on a +glass dish, with a little pitcher of cream. But now what happens is that +I put a dozen apples in a big sauce-pan and let them simmer while I am +eating. We have a rule in our family that we do not do any cooking +except while we are eating, because if we try it at any other time of +the day, we get buried in a book or in a manuscript, and forget about it +until the smoke causes somebody in the street to summon the fire +department. So the apples for my breakfast were cooked during last +night's supper; and during the breakfast there will be some vegetable +cooking for lunch.</p> + +<p>At this lunch, which is my "square meal," I eat a large slice of +beefsteak, say a third of a pound. Jack London used to say that the only +man who could cook a beefsteak was the fireman of a railway locomotive, +because he had a hot,<a name="vol_i_page_133" id="vol_i_page_133"></a> clean shovel. The best imitation you can get is a +hot, clean frying-pan; and when you are sure that it is hot, let it get +hotter. The whole secret of cooking meat is to keep the juices inside, +and to do that you must cook it quickly. When you slap it down on a hot +frying-pan, the meat is seared, and the juices stay inside, and if you +do not turn it over until it is almost ready to burn, you don't need to +cook it very long on the other side. That is the one secret of cooking +worth knowing; it doesn't cost anything, and saves time instead of +wasting it. As I have never found anybody else capable of learning it, I +reserve the cooking of the beefsteak as one of my family duties.</p> + +<p>To continue the lunch, a slice of whole wheat bread, and a large +quantity of some fresh salad, such as celery, or lettuce and tomatoes, +without dressing. For a part of this may be substituted a vegetable, one +or two beets or turnips, cooked during a previous meal, and warmed up in +a couple of minutes; and we do not throw away the tops of the turnips +and beets and celery, we put them on and cook them, and they serve for +the next day's meal. If you would eat a large quantity of such "greens" +once a day, you would escape many of the ills that your flesh is at +present heir to. Finally, for dessert, an orange and a small handful of +raisins, or one or two figs.</p> + +<p>The evening meal will be the same as the breakfast; except once in a +while when I am especially hungry, and want some meat. I am writing in +the winter season, so the fruits suggested are those available in +winter. The menu will be varied with every kind of fruit at the season +when it is cheapest and most easily obtained. The beefsteak will appear +at about three meals out of four; occasionally it will be replaced by +the lean meat of pork or mutton, or by fish. The bread may be replaced +by rice, or boiled potatoes, either white or sweet, and occasionally by +graham crackers. I know that these contain a little fat and sugar, but I +try not to be fanatical about my diet, and the rules I suggest do not +carry the death penalty. There was a time when I used to allow my +friends to make themselves miserable by trying to provide me with +special foods when they invited me to a meal, but now I tell them to +"forget it," and I politely nibble a little of everything, and eat most +of what I find wholesome; if there is nothing wholesome, I content +myself with the pretense of a<a name="vol_i_page_134" id="vol_i_page_134"></a> meal. If I find myself in a restaurant, I +quite shamelessly get a piece of apple or pumpkin pie, omitting most of +the crust. As I don't go away from home more than once or twice a month, +I do not have to worry about such indulgence. The main thing is to +arrange one's home diet on sound lines, and learn to enjoy the simple +and wholesome foods, of which there is a great variety obtainable, and +at prices possible to all but the wretchedly poor.</p> + +<p>In conclusion, since everybody likes to have a feast now and then, I +specify that my diet regimen allows for holidays. Assuming that I am +your guest for a day, and that you wish to "blow" me, regardless of +expense, here will be the menu. Breakfast, some graham crackers, a bunch +of raisins, a can of sliced pineapple in winter, or a big chunk of +watermelon in summer. Dinner, or lunch, roast pork, a baked apple, a +baked sweet potato and some spinach. Supper, lettuce, dates, and a dish +of popcorn flavored with peanut butter. Try this next Christmas!</p> + +<p>P. S. After this book had been put into type, I chanced to be looking +over Herbert Quick's illuminating book, "On Board the Good Ship Earth." +Discussing the importance of certain organic salts to the body, Dr. +Quick states: "Animals have been fed, as an experiment, on foods +deficient in phosphorus. For a while they seemed to do well. Then they +collapsed. It takes only three months of a ration without phosphorus to +wreck an animal. Individual creatures were killed after a month of this +diet, and it was found that the flesh was taking the phosphate—for the +phosphorus exists in the body in that form—from the bones to supply its +need. In other words, the body was eating its own bones! When this +process had robbed the bones to the limit, the collapse came, and the +animal could never recover."<a name="vol_i_page_135" id="vol_i_page_135"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXI" id="CHAPTER_XXI"></a>CHAPTER XXI<br /><br /> +DIET STANDARDS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses various foods and their food values, the quantities we +need, and their money cost.)</p></div> + +<p>I think there is no more important single question about health than the +question of how much food we should eat. It is one about which there is +a great deal of controversy, even among the best authorities. We shall +try here for a common-sense solution. At the outset we have to remind +ourselves of the distinction we tried to draw between nature and man. To +what extent can civilized man rely upon his instincts to keep him in +perfect health?</p> + +<p>Let us begin by considering the animals. How is their diet problem +solved? Horses and cattle in a wild state are adjusted to certain foods +which they find in nature, and so long as they can find it, they have no +diet problem. Man comes, and takes these animals and domesticates them; +he observes their habits, and gives to them a diet closely approaching +the natural one, and they get along fairly well. But suppose the man, +with his superior skill in agriculture, taking wild grain and planting +it, reaping and threshing it by machinery, puts before his horse an +unlimited quantity of a concentrated food such as oats, which the horse +can never get in a natural state—will that horse's instincts guide it? +Not at all. Any horse will kill itself by overeating on grain.</p> + +<p>I have read somewhere a clever saying, that a farm is a good place for +an author to live, provided he can be persuaded not to farm it. But once +upon a time I had not heard that wise remark, and I owned and tried to +run a farm. I had two beautiful cows of which I was very proud, and one +morning I woke up and discovered that the cows had got into the pear +orchard and had been feeding on pears all night. In a few hours they +both lay with bloated stomachs, dying. A farmer told me afterwards that +I might have saved their lives, if I had stuck a knife into their +stomachs to let out the gas. I do not know whether this is true or not. +But my two dead cows afford a perfect illustration of the reason<a name="vol_i_page_136" id="vol_i_page_136"></a> why +civilized man cannot rely upon his instincts and his appetites to tell +him when he has had enough to eat. He can only do this, provided he +rigidly restricts himself to the foods which he ate in the days when his +teeth and stomach and bowels were being shaped by the process of natural +selection. If he is going to eat any other than such strictly natural +foods, he will need to apply his reason to his diet schedule.</p> + +<p>In a state of nature man has to hunt his food, and the amount that he +finds is generally limited, and requires a lot of exercise to get. +Explorers in Africa give us a picture of man's life in the savage state, +guided by his instincts and very little interfered with by reason. The +savages will starve for long periods, then they will succeed in killing +a hippopotamus or a buffalo, and they will gorge themselves, and nearly +all of them will be ill, and several of them will die. So you see, even +in a state of nature, and with natural foods, restraint is needed, and +reason and moral sense have a part to play.</p> + +<p>What do reason and moral sense have to tell us about diet? Our bodily +processes go on continuously, and we need at regular intervals a certain +quantity of a number of different foods. The most elementary experiment +will convince us that we can get along, maintain our body weight and our +working efficiency upon a much smaller quantity of food than we +naturally crave. Civilized custom puts before us a great variety of +delicate and appetizing foods, upon which we are disposed to overeat; +and we are slow observers indeed if we do not note the connection +between this overeating and ill health. So we are forced to the +conclusion that if we wish to stay well, we need to establish a +censorship over our habits; we need a different diet regimen from the +haphazard one which has been established for us by a combination of our +instincts with the perversions of civilization.</p> + +<p>Up to a few years ago, it was commonly taken for granted by authorities +on diet that what the average man actually eats must be the normal thing +for him to eat. Governments which were employing men in armies, and at +road building, and had to feed them and keep them in health, made large +scale observations as to what the men ate, and thus were established the +old fashioned "diet standards." They are expressed in calories, which is +a heat unit representing the quantity of fuel required to heat a certain +small quantity of water a certain number of degrees. In order that you +may<a name="vol_i_page_137" id="vol_i_page_137"></a> know what I am talking about, I will give a rough idea of the +quantity of the more common foods which it takes to make 100 calories: +one medium sized slice of bread, a piece of lean cooked steak the size +of two fingers, one large apple, three medium tablespoonfuls of cooked +rice or potatoes, one large banana, a tablespoonful of raisins, five +dates, one large fig, a teaspoonful of sugar, a ball of butter the size +of your thumbnail, a very large head of lettuce, three medium sized +tomatoes, two-thirds of a glass of milk, a tablespoonful of oil. You +observe, if you compare these various items, how little guidance +concerning food is given by its bulk. You may eat a whole head of +lettuce, weighing nearly a pound, and get no more food value than from a +half ounce of olive oil which you pour over it. You may eat enough lean +beefsteak to cover your plate, and you will not have eaten so much as a +generous helping of butter. A big bowl of strawberries will not count +half so much as the cream and sugar you put over them. So you may +realize that when you eat olive oil, butter, cream, and sugar, you are +in the same danger as the horse eating oats, or as my two cows in the +pear orchard; and if some day a surgeon has to come and stick a knife +into you, it may be for the same reason.</p> + +<p>The old-fashioned diet standards are as follows: Swedish laborers at +hard work, over 4,700 calories; Russian workmen at moderate work, German +soldiers in active service, Italian laborers at moderate work, between +3,500 and 3,700 calories; English weavers, nearly 3,500 calories; +Austrian farm laborers, over 5,000 calories. Some twenty years ago the +United States government made observations of over 15,000 persons, and +established the following, known as the "Atwater standards": men at very +hard muscular work, 5,500 calories; men at moderately active muscular +work, 3,400 calories; men at light to moderate muscular work, 3,050 +calories; men at sedentary, or women at moderately active work, 2,700 +calories.</p> + +<p>In the last ten or fifteen years there has arisen a new school of +dietetic experts, headed by Professors Chittenden and Fisher of Yale +University. Professor Chittenden has published an elaborate book, "The +Nutrition of Man," in which he tells of long-continued experiment upon a +squad of soldiers and a group of athletes at Yale University, also upon +average students and professors. He has proved conclusively that all +these various groups have been able to maintain full body<a name="vol_i_page_138" id="vol_i_page_138"></a> weight and +full working efficiency upon less than half the quantity of protein food +hitherto specified, and upon anywhere from one-half to two-thirds the +calory value set forth in the former standards.</p> + +<p>When I first read this book, I set to work to try its theories upon +myself. During the five or six months that I lived on raw food, I took +the trouble to weigh everything that I ate, and to keep a record. It is, +of course, very easy to weigh raw foods exactly, and I found that I +lived an active life and kept physical health upon slightly less than +2,500 calories a day. I have set this as my standard, and have +accustomed myself to follow it instinctively, and without wasting any +thought upon it. Sometimes I fall from grace; for I still crave the +delightful cakes and candies and ice cream upon which I was brought up. +I always pay the penalty, and know that I will not get back to my former +state of health until I skip a meal or two, and give my system a chance +to clean house. The average man will find the regimen set forth in this +book austere and awe-inspiring; I do not wish to pose as a paragon of +virtue, so perhaps I should quote a sarcastic girl cousin, who remarked +when I was a boy that the way to my heart was with a bag of +ginger-snaps. I live in the presence of candy stores and never think of +their existence, but if someone brings candy into the house and puts it +in front of me, I have to waste a lot of moral energy in letting it +alone. A few years ago I had a young man as secretary who discovered +this failing of mine, and used to afford himself immense glee by buying +a box of chocolates and leaving it on top of my desk. I would give him +back the box—with some of the chocolates missing—but he would persist +in "forgetting it" on my desk; he would hide and laugh hilariously +behind the door, until my wife discovered his nefarious doings, and +warned me of them.</p> + +<p>Professor Chittenden states quite simply the common sense procedure in +the matter of food quantity. Find out by practical experiment what is +the very least food upon which you can do your work without losing +weight. That is the correct quantity for you, and if you are eating +more, you certainly cannot be doing your body any good, and all the +evidence indicates that you are doing it harm. You need not have the +least fear in making this experiment that you will starve yourself. +Later on, in a chapter on fasting, I shall prove to<a name="vol_i_page_139" id="vol_i_page_139"></a> you that you carry +around with you in your body sufficient reserve of food to keep you +alive for eighty or ninety days; and if you draw on a small quantity of +this you do not do yourself the slightest harm. Cut down the amount of +your food; eat the bulky foods, which contain less calory value, and +weigh yourself every day, and you will be surprised to discover how much +less you need to eat than you have been accustomed to.</p> + +<p>One of the things you will find out is that your stomach is easily +fooled; it is largely guided by bulk. If you eat a meal consisting of a +moderate quantity of lean meat, a very little bread, a heaping dish of +turnip greens, and a big slice of watermelon, you will feel fully +satisfied, yet you will not have taken in one-third the calory value +that you would at an ordinary meal with gravies and dressings and +dessert. The bulky kind of food is that for which your system was +adapted in the days when it was shaped by nature. You have a large +stomach, many times as large as you would have had if you had lived on +refined and concentrated foods such as butter, sugar, olive oil, cheese +and eggs. You have a long intestinal tract, adapted to slowly digesting +foods, and to the work of extracting nutrition from a mass of roughage. +You have a very large lower bowel, which Metchnikoff, the Russian +scientist, one of the greatest minds who ever examined the problems of +health, declares a survival, the relic of a previous stage of evolution, +and a source of much disease. The best thing you can do with that lower +bowel is to give it lots of hay, as it requires; in other words, to eat +the salads and greens which contain cellulose material. This contains no +food value, and does not ferment, but fills the lower bowel and +stimulates it to activity.</p> + +<p>If you eat too much food, three things may happen. First, it may not be +digested, and in that case it will fill your system with poisons. +Second, it may be assimilated, but not burned up by the body. In that +case it has to be thrown out by the kidneys or the sweat glands, and +this puts upon these organs an extra strain, to which in the long run +they may be unequal. Or third, the surplus material may be stored up as +fat. This is an old-time trick which nature invented to tide you over +the times when food was scarce. If you were a bear, you would naturally +want to eat all you could, and be as fat as possible in November, so +that you might be able<a name="vol_i_page_140" id="vol_i_page_140"></a> to hunt your prey when you came out from your +winter's sleep in April. But you are not a bear, and you expect to eat +your regular meals all winter; you have established a system of +civilization which makes you certain of your food, and the place where +you keep your surplus is in the bank, or sewed up in the mattress, or +hidden in your stocking. In other words, a civilized man saves money, +and the habit of storing globules of grease in the cells of his body is +a survival of an old instinct, and a needless strain upon his health. +Not merely does the fat man have to carry all the extra weight around +with him, but his body has to keep it and tend it; and what are the +effects of this is fully shown by life insurance tables. People who are +five or ten per cent over weight have five or ten per cent more chance +of dying all the time, while people who are five or ten per cent under +weight have five or ten per cent more than the average of life +expectation. There is no answer to these figures, which are the result +of the tabulation of many hundreds of thousands of cases. The meaning of +them to the fat person is to put himself on a diet of lean meat, green +vegetables and fresh fruits, until he has brought himself down, not +merely to the normal fatness of the civilized man, but to the normal +leanness of the athlete, the soldier on campaign, and the student who +has more important things to think about than stuffing his stomach.</p> + +<p>There is, of course, a certain kind of leanness which is the result of +ill health. There are wasting diseases; tuberculosis, for example, and +anemia. There are people who worry themselves thin, and there are a few +rare "spiritual" people, so-called, who fade away from lack of +sufficient interest in their bodies. That is not the kind of leanness +that I mean, but the active, wiry leanness, which sometimes lives a +hundred years. Nearly always you will find that such people are spare +eaters; and you will find that our ideal of rosy plumpness, both for +adults and children, is a wholly false notion. We once had in our home +as servant an Irish girl, who was what is popularly called "a picture of +health," with those beautiful flaming cheeks that Irish and English +women so often have. She was in her early twenties, and nobody who knew +her had any idea but that her health was perfect. But one morning she +was discovered in bed with one side paralyzed, and in a couple of weeks +she was dead with erysipelas.<a name="vol_i_page_141" id="vol_i_page_141"></a> The color in her cheeks had been nothing +but diseased blood vessels, overloaded with food material; and with the +blood in that condition, one of the tiny vessels in the brain had become +clogged.</p> + +<p>In the same way I have seen children, two or three years old, plump and +rosy, and considered to be everything that children should be; but +pneumonia would hit them, and in two or three days they would be at +death's door. I do not mean that children should be kept hungry; on the +contrary, they should have four or five meals a day, so that they do not +have a chance to become too hungry. But at those meals they should eat +in great part the bulky foods, which contain the natural salts needed +for building the body. If a child asks for food, you may give it an +apple, or you may give it a slice of bread and butter with sugar on it. +The child will be equally well content in either case; but it is for +you, with your knowledge of food values, to realize that the bread with +butter and sugar contains two or three times as much nutriment as the +apple, but contains practically none of the precious organic salts which +will make the child's bones and teeth.</p> + +<p>So far I have discussed this subject as if all foods grew on bushes +outside your kitchen door, and all you had to do was to go and pick off +what you wanted. But as a matter of fact, foods cost money, and under +our present system of wage slavery, the amount of money the average +person can spend for food is strictly limited. In a later book I am +going to discuss the problem of poverty, its causes and remedies. All +that I can do here is to tell you what foods you ought to have, and if +society does not pay you enough for your work to enable you to buy such +foods, you may know that society, is starving you, and you may get busy +to demand your rights as human beings. Meantime, however, such money as +you do have, you want to spend wisely, and the vast majority of you +spend it very unwisely indeed.</p> + +<p>In the first place, a great many of the simplest and most wholesome +foods are cheap—often because people do not know enough to value them. +We insist upon having the choice cuts of meats, because they are more +tender to the teeth, but the cheaper cuts are exactly as nutritious. We +insist upon having our meats loaded with fat, although fatness is an +abnormal condition in an animal, and excess of fat is a<a name="vol_i_page_142" id="vol_i_page_142"></a> grave error in +diet. I live in a country where jack rabbits are a pest, and in the +market they sell for perhaps one-fourth the cost of beef, and yet I can +hardly ever get them, because people value them so little as food; they +prefer the meat of a hog which has been wallowing in a filthy pen, and +has been deliberately made so fat that it could hardly walk!</p> + +<p>I have already spoken of prunes, a much despised and invaluable food. +All the dried fruits are rich in food values, and if we could get them +untreated by chemicals, they would be worth their cost. I was brought up +to despise the cheaper vegetables, such as cabbage and turnips; I never +tasted boiled cabbage until I was forty, and then to my great surprise I +made the discovery that it is good. Raw cabbage is as valuable as any +other salad; it is a trifle harder to digest for some people, but I do +not believe in pampering the stomach. Both potatoes and rice are cheap +and wholesome, if only we would get unpolished rice, and if we would +leave the skins on the potatoes until after they are cooked. Nearly all +the mineral salts of the potato are just under the outer skin, and are +removed by the foolish habit of peeling them.</p> + +<p>The prices of food differ so widely at different seasons and in +different parts of the world, that there is not much profit in trying to +figure how cheaply a person can live. I have found that I spend for the +diet I have indicated here, from sixty to eighty cents a day. I do not +buy any fancy foods, but on the other hand, I do not especially try to +economize; I buy what I want of the simple everyday foods in their +season. Most everyone will find that it is a good business proposition +to buy the foods which he needs to keep in health. If the average +workingman would add up the money he spends, not merely in the +restaurants, but in the candy stores, the drug stores, the tobacco +stores, and the offices of doctors and dentists, he would find, I think, +that he could afford to buy himself the necessary quantity of wholesome +natural foods. For a family of three, in the place where I live, enough +of these foods can be purchased for a dollar a day, and this is about +one-fourth what common labor is being paid, and one-eighth of what +skilled labor is being paid. I will specify the foods: a pound and a +half of shoulder steak, a loaf of whole wheat bread or a box of shredded +wheat biscuit, a head of cabbage, a pound of prunes, and four or five +pounds of apples.<a name="vol_i_page_143" id="vol_i_page_143"></a></p> + +<p>There are many ways of saving in the purchase of food if you put your +mind upon it. If you are buying prunes, you may pay as high as fifty +cents or a dollar a pound for the big ones, and they are not a bit +better than the tiny ones, which you can buy for as low as eight cents a +pound in bulk. When bread is stale, the bakers sell it for half price, +despite the fact that only then has it become fit to eat. If you buy +canned peaches, you will pay a fancy price for them, and they will be +heavy with cane sugar; but if you inquire, you find what are known as +"pie peaches," put up in gallon tins without sugar, and at about half +the price. The butcher will sell you what he calls "hamburg steak" at a +very low price, and if you let him prepare it out of your sight, he will +fill it with fat and gristle; but let him make some while you watch, and +then you have a very good food. One of my diet rules is that I do not +trust the capitalist system to fix me up any kind of mixed or ground or +prepared foods. I have not eaten sausage since I saw it made in Chicago.</p> + +<p>Also there is something to know about the cooking of foods, since it is +possible to take perfectly good foods and spoil them by bad cooking. +Once upon a time our family discovered a fireless cooker, and thought +that was a wonderful invention for an absent-minded author and a wife +who is given to revising manuscripts. But recent investigations which +have been made into the nature of the "vitamines," food ferments which +are only partly understood, suggest that prolonged cooking of food may +be a great mistake. The starch has to be cooked in order to break the +cell walls by the expansion of the material inside. Twenty minutes will +be enough in the case of everything except beans, which need to be +cooked four or five hours. Meat should be eaten rare, except in the case +of pork, which harbors a parasite dangerous to the human body; therefore +pork should always be thoroughly cooked. The white of eggs is made less +digestible by boiling hard or frying. Eggs should never be allowed to +boil; put them on in cold water, and take them off as soon as the water +begins to boil. It is not necessary to cook either fresh fruit or dried. +The dried fruits may be soaked and eaten raw, but I find that several +fruits, especially apples and pears, do not agree with me well if they +are eaten raw, so I stew them for fifteen or twenty minutes. I have no +objection to canned fruits and vegetables, provided one takes<a name="vol_i_page_144" id="vol_i_page_144"></a> the +trouble in opening them to make sure there is no sign of spoiling. If +you put up your own fruits, do not put in any sugar. All you have to do +is to let them boil for a few minutes, and to seal them tightly while +they are boiling hot. The whole secret of preserving is to exclude the +air with its bacteria.</p> + +<p>If you live on a farm, you will have no trouble in following the diet +here outlined, for you can produce for yourselves all the foods that I +have recommended; only do not make the mistake of shipping out your best +foods, and taking back the products of a factory, just because you have +read lying advertisements about them. Take your own wheat and oats and +corn to the mill, and have it ground whole, and make your own breads and +cereals. Try the experiment of mixing whole corn meal with water and a +little salt, and baking it into hard, crisp "corn dodgers." I do not eat +these—but only because I cannot buy them, and have no time to make +them.</p> + +<p>Another common article of food which I do not recommend is salted and +smoked meats. I do not pretend to know the effects of large quantities +of salt and saltpetre and wood smoke upon the human system, but I know +that Dr. Wiley's "poison squad" proved definitely that a number of these +inorganic minerals are injurious to health, and I prefer to take fresh +meat when I can get it. I use a moderate quantity of common salt on meat +and potatoes, because there seems to be a natural craving for this. I +know that many health enthusiasts insist that I am thus putting a strain +on my kidneys, but I will wait until these health enthusiasts make clear +to me why deer and cattle and horses in a wild state will travel many +miles to a salt-lick. I have learned that it is easy to make plausible +statements about health, but not so easy to prove them. For example, I +was told that it is injurious to drink water at meals, and for years I +religiously avoided the habit; but it occurred to some college professor +to find out if this was really true, and he carried on a series of +experiments which proved that the stomach works better when its contents +are diluted. The only point about drinking at meals is that you should +not use the liquid to wash down your food without chewing it.</p> + +<p>I can suggest two other ways by which you may save money on food. One is +by not eating too much, and another<a name="vol_i_page_145" id="vol_i_page_145"></a> is by eating all that you buy. The +amount of food that is wasted by the people of America would feed the +people of any European nation. The amount of food that is thrown out +from any one of our big American leisure class hotels would feed the +children of a European town. I think it may fairly be described as a +crime to throw into the garbage pail food which might nourish human +life. In our family we have no garbage pail. What little waste there is, +we burn in the stove, and my wife turns it into roses. It consists of +the fat which we cannot help getting at the butcher's, and the bones of +meat, and the skins of some fruits and vegetables. It would never enter +into our minds to throw out a particle of bread, or meat, or other +wholesome food. If we have something that we fear may spoil, we do not +throw it out, but put it into a saucepan and cook it for a few minutes. +If you will make the same rule in your home, you will stop at least that +much of the waste of American life; and as to the big leisure class +hotels, and the banquet tables of the rich—just wait a few years, and I +think the social revolution will attend to them!<a name="vol_i_page_146" id="vol_i_page_146"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXII" id="CHAPTER_XXII"></a>CHAPTER XXII<br /><br /> +FOODS AND POISONS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Concludes the subject of diet, and discusses the effect upon the +system of stimulants and narcotics.)</p></div> + +<p>A few years ago there died an old gentleman who had devoted some twenty +years of his life to teaching people to chew their food. Horace Fletcher +was his name, and his ideas became a fad, and some people carried them +to comical extremes. But Fletcher made a real discovery; what he called +"the food filter." This is the automatic action of the swallowing +apparatus, whereby nature selects the food which has been sufficiently +prepared for digestion. If you chew a mouthful of food without ever +performing the act of swallowing, you will find that the food gradually +disappears. What happens is that all of it which has been reduced to a +thin paste will slip unnoticed down your throat, and you may go on +putting more food into your mouth, and chewing, and can eat a whole meal +without ever performing the act of swallowing. Fletcher claimed that +this is the proper way to eat, and that you can train yourself to follow +this method. I have tried his idea and adopted it. One of my diet rules, +to which there is no exception, is that if I haven't the time to chew my +food properly, I haven't the time to eat; I skip that meal.</p> + +<p>The habit of bolting food is a source of disease. To be sure, the +carnivorous animals bolt their food, but they are tougher than we are, +and do not carry the burden of a large brain and a complex nervous +system. If you swallow your meals half chewed, and wash them down with +liquids, you may get away with it for a while, but some day you will pay +for it with dyspepsia and nervous troubles. And the same thing applies +to your habit of jumping up from meals and rushing away to work, whether +it be work of the muscles, or of brain and nerves. Proper digestion +requires the presence of a quantity of blood in the walls of the stomach +and digestive tract. It requires the attention of your subconscious +mind, and this means rest of muscles and brain centers.<a name="vol_i_page_147" id="vol_i_page_147"></a> If you cannot +rest for an hour after meals, omit that meal, or make it a light one, of +fruit juices, which are almost immediately absorbed by the stomach, and +of salads, which do not ferment. You may rest assured that it will not +hurt you to skip a meal, and make up for it when you have time to be +quiet. I have been many times in my life under very intense and long +continued nervous strain; for example, during the Colorado coal strike, +I led a public demonstration which kept me in a state of excitement all +the day and a good part of the night several weeks. During this period I +ate almost nothing; a baked apple and a cup of custard would be as near +as I would go to a meal, and as a result I came through the experience +without any injury whatever to my health. I lost perhaps ten pounds in +weight, but that was quickly made up when I settled back to a normal way +of life.</p> + +<p>I have been on camping trips when I had a great deal of hard work to do, +carrying a canoe long distances on my back, or paddling it forty miles a +day. On the mornings of such a trip I have seen a guide cook himself an +elaborate breakfast of freshly baked bread, bacon, and even beans, and +make a hearty meal and then go straight to work. My meal, on the +contrary, would consist of a small dish of stewed prunes, or perhaps +some huckleberries or raspberries, if they could be found. I will not +say that I could do as much as the guide, because he was used to it, and +I was not. But I can say this—if I had eaten his breakfast at the start +of the day, I would have been dead before night; and I mean the word +"dead" quite literally. I know a man who started to climb Whiteface +mountain in the Adirondacks. He climbed half way, and then ate lunch, +which consisted of nine hard boiled eggs. Then he started to climb the +rest of the mountain, and dropped dead of acute indigestion.</p> + +<p>There are few poisons which can affect the system more quickly, or more +dangerously, than a mass of food which is not digested. The stomach is +an ideal forcing-house for the breeding of bacteria. It provides warmth +and moisture, and you, in your meal, provide the bacteria and the +material upon which they thrive. Under normal conditions, the stomach +pours out a gastric juice which kills the bacteria; but let this gastric +juice for any reason be lacking—because your nervous energy has gone +somewhere else, or because your<a name="vol_i_page_148" id="vol_i_page_148"></a> blood-stream, from which the gastric +juice must be made, has been drawn away to the muscles by hard labor; +then you have a yeast-pot, with great quantities of gases and poisons. +In acute cases the results are evident enough: violent pains and +convulsions, followed by coma and the turning black of the body. But +what you should understand is that you may produce a milder case of such +poisoning, and may do it day after day habitually, and little by little +your vital organs will be weakened by the strain.</p> + +<p>It does not make any difference at what hour of the twenty-four you take +the great bulk of your food. It is one of the commonest delusions that +you get some strengthening effect from your food immediately, and must +have this strength in order to do hard work. To be sure, there are +substances, such as grape-sugar, which require practically no digesting; +you can hold them in the mouth, and they will be digested by the saliva, +and absorbed at once into the blood-stream. But unless you have been +starved for a long period you do not need to get your strength in this +rush fashion. If you ate your normal meals on the previous day, your +blood-stream is fully supplied with nutriment which has been put through +a long process of preparation, and you can get up in the morning and +work all day, if necessary, upon what is already in your system. To be +sure, you may feel hungry, and even faint, but that is merely a matter +of habit; your system is accustomed to taking food and expects it. But +if you are a laborer doing hard work, you can easily train yourself to +eat a light meal in the morning, and another light meal at noon, and to +eat a hearty meal when your work is done and you can rest. Two light +meals and a hearty meal are all that any system needs, and you can prove +it to yourself by trying it, and watching your weight once a week.</p> + +<p>I have tried many experiments, and the conclusion to which I have come +is that there is no virtue in any particular meal-hours or any +particular number of meals. For several years I tried the experiment of +two meals a day. I was living a retired life, and had little contact +with the world, and I would make a hearty meal at ten o'clock in the +morning, and another at five in the afternoon. But later on I found that +inconvenient, and now I take a light breakfast, and two moderate-sized +meals at the conventional hours of lunch and dinner. I can arrange my +own time, so after meal times is<a name="vol_i_page_149" id="vol_i_page_149"></a> when I get my reading done. Sometimes, +when I am tired, I feel sleepy after meals, but I have learned not to +yield to this impulse. I do not know how to explain this; I have +observed that animals sleep after eating, and it appears to be a natural +thing to do; but I know that if I go to sleep after a meal, nature makes +clear to me that I have made a mistake, and I do not repeat it. I never +eat at night, and always go to bed on an empty stomach, so I am always +hungry when I open my eyes in the morning. I never know what it is not +to be hungry at meal times, and my habits are so regular that I could +set my watch by my stomach.</p> + +<p>Another common habit which is harmful is eating between meals. I have +known people who are accustomed to nibble at food nearly all the time. +Shelley records that he tried it as an experiment, thinking it might be +a convenient way to get digestion done—but he found that it did not +work. The stomach is apparently meant to work in pulses; to do a job of +digesting, and then to rest and accumulate the juices for another job. +It will accustom itself to a certain régime, and will work accordingly, +but if, when it has half digested a load of food, you pile more food in +on top, you make as much trouble as you would make in your kitchen if +you required your cook to prepare another meal before she has cleaned up +after the last one. Three times a day is enough for any adult to eat. +Children require to eat oftener, because their bodies are more active, +and they not merely have to keep up weight, but to add to it. The +simplest way to arrange matters with children is to give them three good +meals at the hours when adults eat, and then to give them a couple of +pieces of fruit between breakfast and lunch, and again between lunch and +supper. I have never seen a child who would not be satisfied with this, +when once the habit was established.</p> + +<p>I have already spoken of the cooking and serving of food. I consider +that the "gastronomic art," as it is pompously called, is ninety-nine +per cent plain rubbish. To be sure, if foods are appetizingly prepared, +and look good and smell good and taste good, they will cause the gastric +juices to flow abundantly, as the Russian scientist Pavlov has +demonstrated by practical experiment with the stomach-pump. But I know +without any stomach-pump that the best thing to make my gastric juices +flow is hard work and a spare diet. When I<a name="vol_i_page_150" id="vol_i_page_150"></a> come home from five sets of +tennis, and have a cold shower and a rub-down, my gastric juices will +flow for a piece of cold beefsteak and a cold sweet potato, quite as +well as for anything that is served by a leisure class "chef." Needless +to say, I want food to be fresh, and I want it to be clean, but I have +other things to do with my time and money than to pamper my appetites +and encourage food whims.</p> + +<p>If you have a grandmother, or ever had one, you know what grandmothers +tell you about "hot nourishing food"; but I have tried the experiment, +and satisfied myself that there is absolutely no difference in +nourishing qualities between hot food and cold food. If you chew your +food sufficiently, it will all be ninety-eight and six-tenths degree +food when it gets to your stomach, and that is the way your stomach +wants it. Of course, if you have been out in a blizzard, and are +chilled, and want to restore the body temperature, a hot drink will be +one of the quickest ways, and if the emergency is extreme, you may even +add a stimulant. On the other hand, if you are suffering from heat, it +is sensible to cool your body by a cold drink. But you should use as +much judgment with yourself as you would with a horse, which you do not +permit to drink a lot of cold water when he is heated up, and is going +into his stall to stand still.</p> + +<p>I have mentioned the word "stimulants," and this opens a large subject. +There are drugs which affect the body in two different ways: some excite +the nerves, and through the nerves the heart and blood-stream, to more +intense activity; others have the effect of deadening the nerves, and +dulling the sense of exhaustion and pain. One of these groups is called +stimulants, and the other is called narcotics; but as a matter of fact +the stimulants are really narcotics, because they operate by dulling the +nerves whose function it is to prevent the over-accumulation of fatigue +poisons; in other words, they keep the nerves and muscles from knowing +that they are tired, and so they go on working.</p> + +<p>It is possible, of course, to conceive of an emergency in which that is +necessary. Once upon a time, on a hunting trip, I had been traveling all +day, and was caught in a rain storm, and exhausted and chilled to the +bone; I had to make camp without a fire, so when I got the tent up I +wrapped myself in blankets and drank a couple of tablespoons full of +whiskey. That is the only time I have ever taken whiskey in my life,<a name="vol_i_page_151" id="vol_i_page_151"></a> +and it warmed me almost instantly, and did me no harm. In the same way +there were two or three occasions when I was on the verge of a nervous +breakdown, and could not sleep, and let the doctor give me a sleeping +powder. But in each case I knew that I was fooling with a dangerous +habit, and I did no more fooling than necessary. No one should make use +of either stimulants or narcotics except in extreme emergency, and never +but a few times in a lifetime. What you should do is to change your +habits so that you will not need to over-strain.</p> + +<p>All these drugs are habit forming; that is to say, they leave the body +no better, and with a craving for a repetition of the relief. When you +are tired, it is because your muscles and nerves are storing up fatigue +poisons more rapidly than your blood-stream can get rid of them. You +need to know about this condition, and exhaustion and pain are nature's +protective warning. If you put a stop to the warning, you are as +unintelligent as the Eastern despots who used to cut off the head of the +messenger who brought bad tidings. If, when you have a headache, you go +into a drug store and let the druggist mix you one of those white fizzy +drinks, what you are doing is not to get rid of the poisons in your +blood-stream, but merely to reduce the action of your heart, so as to +keep the blood from pressing so fast into the aching blood vessels and +nerves. You may try that trick with your heart a number of times, but +sooner or later you will try it once too often—your heart will stop a +little bit quicker than you meant it to!</p> + +<p>Drugs are poisons, and their action depends upon their poisoning some +particular portion of the body, and temporarily paralyzing it. And bear +this in mind, they are none the less poisonous because they are +"natural" products. You can kill yourself by cyanide of potassium, which +comes out of a chemist's retort; but you can kill yourself just as dead +with laudanum, which comes out of a plant, or with the contents of the +venom sac of a snake. You are poisoning yourself none the less certainly +if you use alcohol, which is made from the juices of beautiful fruits, +and has had hosts of famous poets writing songs about it; or you can +poison yourself with the caffein which you get in a lovely brown bean +which comes from Brazil, fragrant to the nostrils and delicious to the +taste. You may drink wine and tea and coffee<a name="vol_i_page_152" id="vol_i_page_152"></a> for a hundred years, and +have your picture published in the newspapers as a proof that these +habits conduce to health; but nothing will be said about the large +number of people who practiced these habits, and didn't live so long, +and about how long they might have lived if they hadn't practiced these +habits.</p> + +<p>I was brought up in the South, and my "elders" belonged to a generation +which had grown up in war time. For this reason many of the men both +drank and smoked to excess, and in my boyhood I lived among them and +watched them, and with the help of advice from a wise mother, I +conceived a horror of every kind of stimulant. The alcoholic poets could +not fool me; I had been in the alcoholic wards of the hospitals. I had +seen one man after another, beautiful and kindly and gracious men, +dragged down into a pit of torment and shame.</p> + +<p>Alcohol is, I think, the greatest trap that nature ever set for the feet +of the human race. It is responsible for more degradation and misery +than any other evil in the world; and I say this, knowing well that my +Socialist friends will cry, "What about Capitalism?" My answer is that I +doubt if there ever would have been any Capitalism in the world, if it +had not been for alcohol. If the workers had not been systematically +poisoned, and all their savings taken from them by the gin-mill, they +would never have submitted to the capitalist system, they would have +built the co-operative commonwealth at the time they were building the +first factories. I listen to the arguments of my radical friends about +"personal liberty," but I note that in Russia, when it was a question of +making a practical revolution and keeping it alive, the first thing the +leaders did was to drag out the contents of the wine-cellars of the +palaces, and smash them in the gutters.</p> + +<p>Tea and coffee are, of course, much milder in their effects than +alcohol; you can play with them longer, and the punishment will be less +severe. But if you make habitual use of them, you will pay the penalty +which all drugs exact from the system. Your brain and your nerve centers +will be less sensitive, less capable of working except under the +influence of drugs; their reacting power will be dulled, and they will +wear out more quickly. I have watched the slaves of the "morning cup of +coffee," and know how they suffer when<a name="vol_i_page_153" id="vol_i_page_153"></a> they do not get it. Likewise, I +have watched the tea drinkers. It is comical to live in England, and see +all the able-bodied men obliged to leave their work at four o'clock in +the afternoon, and seek the regular stimulus for their tired nerves. If +you are to meet anybody, it is always for "tea" that the ceremony is +set, and if you refuse to drink tea, your hostess will be uncomfortable, +unable to talk about anything but the strange, incredible notion that +one can live without tea. I discovered after a while the solution of +this problem; I would say that I preferred a little hot water, if you +please, and so my hostess would pour me a cup of hot water, and I would +sit and gravely sip it, and everybody would be perfectly content: I was +conforming to the outward appearance of normality, which is what the +British conventions require.</p> + +<p>I have never drunk a cup of coffee, so I do not know what its effect on +me would be. But some fifteen years ago I drank a glass of very weak +iced tea at eight o'clock in the evening, and did not get to sleep until +four or five the next morning. So I know that there is really a drug in +tea. I know also that I might accustom my system to it, just as I might +learn to poison my lungs with nicotine without being made immediately +and suddenly ill; but why should I wish to do this? Life is so +interesting to me that I do not need to stimulate my brain centers in +order to appreciate the thrill of it. And when I am tired, I can rest +myself by listening to music, or by reading a worth-while novel—things +which I have found do not leave the after effects of nicotine.</p> + +<p>I remember the first time I met Jack London. Our meeting consisted in +good part of his "kidding" me, because I was lacking in the congenial +vices of the café. He told me how much I had missed, because I had never +been drunk; One ought to try the great adventure, at least once! Poor +Jack is gone, because his kidneys gave out at forty; and nothing could +seem more ungracious than to point out that I am still alive, and +finding life enjoyable. Yet, in this book we are trying to find out how +to live, and if there are habits which wreck and destroy a magnificent +physique, and bring a great genius to death at the age of forty—surely +the rest of us want to know about it, and to be warned in time. I +mention Jack London in this connection, because he has said the last +word on the subject of alcohol. Read "John Barleycorn," and especially +read between the lines of it,<a name="vol_i_page_154" id="vol_i_page_154"></a> and you will not need my argument to +persuade you to be glad that the Eighteenth Amendment has been written +into the Constitution, and that it is your duty as a Socialist, not +merely to obey it, but to vote for its enforcement.</p> + +<p>I am proceeding on the assumption that your life is of importance to +you; that you have a job to do which you know to be worth while, and to +which you desire to apply your powers. You agree with me that the +workers of the world are suffering, and that it is necessary for them to +find their freedom, and that this takes hard work and hard thinking. You +may say that I exaggerate the amount of harm that is done to the system +by tea and coffee, alcohol and tobacco. Well, let us assume that in +moderate quantities they do no harm at all: even so, I have the right to +ask you to show that they do some good; otherwise, surely, it is a +mistake for the workers to spend their savings upon them.</p> + +<p>Consider, for example, the amount of money which the wage slaves of the +world spend upon tobacco. Suppose they could be persuaded for two or +three years to spend this amount upon good reading matter—do you not +think there would be an improvement in their condition? Surely you +cannot maintain that the use of tobacco is necessary to the activities +of the brain! Surely you do not think that a man has to have a cigarette +in order to stimulate his thoughts, or to smoke a pipe to rest himself +after his work is done! I offer myself as evidence in such a +controversy; I have written as many books as any man in the radical +movement, and the sum total of my lifetime smoking amounts to one-half +of one cigarette. I tried that when I was eight years old, and somebody +told me a policeman would arrest me if he caught me, and I threw away +the cigarette, and ran and hid in an alley, and have not yet got over my +scare.</p> + +<p>In the "Journal for Industrial Hygiene" for October, 1920, is an article +entitled "Fatigue and Efficiency of Smokers in a Strenuous Mental +Occupation." Experiments were conducted among telegraph operators, and +the result showed that "the heavy smokers of the group show a higher +output rate at the beginning of the day than the light smokers, but +their rate falls off more markedly in the late hours, and their +production for the whole day is definitely less than that of the light +smokers. The heavy smokers also show less ability than the light smokers +to respond to increasing pressure of<a name="vol_i_page_155" id="vol_i_page_155"></a> work in the late hours of the day +by handling their full share of the work presented."</p> + +<p>One point upon which every medical authority agrees is—that the use of +nicotine is of deadly effect upon the immature organism. Half-grown +youths who smoke cigarettes will never be full-sized men; they will +never have normal lungs or a normal heart. And likewise, all authorities +agree about the effect of smoking upon the organism of women. I gave +what little help I could to the task of helping to set women free, and +to make them the equals of men; but I was always pained when I +discovered that some of my feminist friends understood by woman's +emancipation no more than her right to adopt men's vices. I would say to +these ardent young female radicals, who cultivate the art of dangling a +cigarette from their lower lip, and sip cocktails out of coffee-cups in +Greenwich Village cafés, that they will never be able to bear sound +children; but I know that this would not interest them—they don't want +to bear any children at all. So I say that they will never be able to +think straight thoughts, and will be nervous invalids when they are +thirty.</p> + +<p>We went to war to make the world safe for democracy, and we put several +millions of our young men into armies, and if there were any of them who +did not already know how to smoke cigarettes, they learned it under +official sanction. So now we have a national tobacco bill that runs up +to two billions, and will insure us a new generation of "Class C" +rating. Speaking to the young radicals who are reading my books, I say: +We want to make the world over, to make it a place of freedom and +kindness, instead of the hell of greed and hate that it is today. For +that purpose we need a new moral code, and we can never win our victory +without it. I have attended radical conventions, sitting in unventilated +halls amid clouds of tobacco smoke, and listening to men wrangle all +through the day and a great part of the night; I have watched the fatal +dissensions in the movement, the quarrelings of the right wingers and +the left wingers and all stages and degrees in between, and I have +wondered—not jestingly, but in pitying earnest—how much of all those +personalities and factional misunderstanding had their origin in carbon +dioxide and nicotine. There is no use suggesting such ideas to the older +men, whose habits are fixed; but a new generation is coming on, with a +new vision of the enormous<a name="vol_i_page_156" id="vol_i_page_156"></a> task before it; and is it too much to expect +of these young men and women, that they shall realize in advance the +grim tasks they have to do, and shall learn to run the machine of their +body so as to get out of it the maximum amount of service? Is it too +much to hope for, that some day we shall have a race of young fighters +for truth and justice, who are willing to live abstemious lives, and +consecrate themselves to the task of delivering mankind from wage +slavery and war?<a name="vol_i_page_157" id="vol_i_page_157"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXIII" id="CHAPTER_XXIII"></a>CHAPTER XXIII<br /><br /> +MORE ABOUT HEALTH</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the subjects of breathing and ventilation, clothing, +bathing and sleep.)</p></div> + +<p>In discussing the question of health, we have given the greater part of +the space to the subject of diet, for the reason that experience has +convinced us that diet is two-thirds of health, and that nearly always +in disease you find errors of diet playing a part. There are, however, +other important factors of health, now to be discussed.</p> + +<p>Everything of which the body makes use is taken in the form of food and +drink, with the exception of one substance, the oxygen we get out of the +air. Every time we draw a breath we take in a certain amount of oxygen, +and every time we expel a breath, we drive out a certain amount of a gas +called carbon dioxide, which is what the body makes of the fuel it +burns. The body can get along for several days without water, and for +two or three months without food, but it can only get along for two or +three minutes without oxygen. It should be obvious that when the body +expels carbon dioxide, with a slight mixture of other more poisonous +gases, and sucks back what it expects will be a fresh supply of oxygen, +it wants to get oxygen, and not the same gases it has just expelled, nor +gases which have been expelled from the lungs of other people.</p> + +<p>In the days when primitive man lived outdoors, he did not have to think +about this problem. When he breathed poison from his lungs, the moving +air of nature blew it away, and the infinite vegetation of nature took +the carbon dioxide and turned it back into oxygen. And even when man +built himself shelters, he was not cunning enough to make them +air-tight; he had to leave a big hole for the smoke to get out, and +smaller holes through which to get light. But now our wonderful +civilization has solved these problems; we make our walls of air-tight +plaster, and we have invented a substance which will admit light without +admitting air. So we have the "white plague" of tuberculosis, and so we +have<a name="vol_i_page_158" id="vol_i_page_158"></a> innumerable minor plagues of coughs and colds and sore throats.</p> + +<p>In the summer time the solution of the problem is easy. Have as many +doors and windows in your home as possible, and keep them open, and have +nothing in your home to make dust or to retain dust. But then comes +stormy and cold weather, and you have to close your doors and windows, +and keep your home at a higher temperature than the air outside. How +shall you do this, and at the same time get a continual supply of fresh +air?</p> + +<p>I will take the various methods of heating one by one. The problem in +each case is simple and can be made clear in a sentence or two.</p> + +<p>First, the open fireplace. This is a perfect solution, if you have +enough fuel, and do not have to worry about the waste of heat. An open +fireplace draws out all the air in the room in a short time, and you do +not have to bother about opening doors or windows; you may be sure that +the air is getting in through some cracks, or else the fire would not +burn.</p> + +<p>Second, a wood or coal or gas stove in the room, provided with a proper +vent, so that all the gases of combustion are drawn up the chimney. This +changes the air more slowly than an open fireplace, but it does the work +fairly well. All that you have to be careful about is that your vent is +sufficiently large and is working properly. If your fire does not +"draw," you will have smoke or coal-gas in the house, and this is bad +for the lungs; but worse for the lungs is a gas that you can neither see +nor smell nor taste, the deadly carbon monoxide. This gas is produced by +incomplete combustion, and whenever you see yellow flames from gas or +coal, you are apt to have this poisonous substance. Small quantities of +it are sufficient to cause violent headaches, and repeated doses of it +are fatal. Men who work in garages which are not properly ventilated run +this risk all the time, because carbon monoxide is one of the products +of imperfect combustion in the gas engine.</p> + +<p>Next, the furnace. A furnace sends fresh warm air into your house; the +only trouble is that it takes out all the moisture, and some authorities +say that this is bad for the lungs and throat. I do not know whether +this is true, but all furnaces are supposed to have a water chamber to +supply<a name="vol_i_page_159" id="vol_i_page_159"></a> moisture to the air, and you should keep a pan of water on every +stove or radiator in your house.</p> + +<p>Next, steam heat, which includes hot-water heating. This is one of the +abominations of our civilization, and one of the methods by which our +race is committing suicide. There is nothing wrong about steam heat in +itself; the room is warmed in a harmless way; but the trouble is it +stays warm only so long as the doors and windows are kept shut. You are +in an air-tight box, and can be warm provided you do not mind being +suffocated. The moment you open a door or window, you have a cold draft +on your feet, and if you wish to change the air entirely you have to let +out all the heat; so, of course, you never do change it entirely, but go +on breathing the same air over and over, and every time you breathe it +the condition of your body is a little more reduced.</p> + +<p>The solution of this problem is not to heat the air in the room, but to +use your steam coils to heat fresh air, and then drive this air, already +warmed, into the room, at the same time providing a vent through which +the old air can be pushed out. This is the hot air system of heating, +and it requires some kind of engine or dynamo, and therefore is +expensive. It has been installed in a few office buildings and theaters. +One of the most perfect systems I ever inspected is in the building of +the New York Stock Exchange, where the air is warmed in winter, and +cooled in summer, and freed from dust, and exactly the right quantity is +supplied. It is a humorous commentary upon our civilization that we take +perfect care of the breathing apparatus of our stock-gamblers, but pay +no attention to the breathing apparatus of our senators and congressmen, +whose one business in life is to use their lungs. The stately old +building with its white marble domes looks impressive in moving pictures +and on illustrated postcards, but it has no system of ventilation +whatever, and is a death-trap to the poor wretches who are compelled to +spend their days, and sometimes their nights, within its walls. This +contrast is one symptom of the rise of industrial capitalism and the +collapse of political democracy.</p> + +<p>We have reserved to the last a method of heating which is the worst, and +can only be described as a crime against health: the use of gas and oil +stoves set out in the middle of the room, without a vent, and +discharging their fumes into the room. These stoves are simply +instruments of slow death,<a name="vol_i_page_160" id="vol_i_page_160"></a> and their manufacture should be prohibited +by law. In the meantime, what you have to do is to refuse to live in a +room or to work in an office where such stoves are used. I have heard +dealers insist that this or the other kind of gas or oil stove was so +contrived as to consume all the fumes. Do not let anybody fool you with +such nonsense. There has never been any form of combustion devised which +consumes all the fumes. No such thing can be, because the products of +combustion are not combustible. The so-called "wickless blue flame" +stoves do burn all the oil, and a properly regulated gas stove will burn +all the gas, but that simply means that it turns the oil and gas into +carbon dioxide, the very substance which your lungs are working day and +night to get out of your body.</p> + +<p>Moreover, there is no oil or gas stove which ever burns perfectly all +the time, either because there is too much gas or insufficient air. Oil +and gas stoves sometimes give a partly yellow flame. You can cause them +to give a yellow flame at any time by blowing air against them, and that +yellow flame means imperfect combustion, and a probability of the deadly +carbon monoxide. These facts are known to every chemist and to every +student of hygiene, and the fact that civilized people continue to burn +such oil and gas stoves in their homes and offices is simply one more +proof that our civilization values human welfare and health at nothing +whatever in comparison with profits.</p> + +<p>Not merely should you see that you have a continuous supply of fresh air +in your home, but you should try to keep down dust in your home, and +especially fine particles of lint. Once upon a time our ancestors were +unable to make houses and floors tight, and so they put rugs on the +floors and hung tapestries on the walls to keep out the wind. We +civilized people are able to make both floors and walls absolutely +tight, and yet we continue to use rugs and curtains, it being the first +principle of our education that propriety requires us to continue to do +the things which our ancestors did. I am unable to think of a more silly +or stupid thing in the world than a rug or a curtain, but I have lived +in the house with them all my life, because, alas, the ladies cannot be +happy otherwise. They want their homes to be "pretty," and so they +continue to set dust traps, and to set themselves futile jobs of house +cleaning and shopping.<a name="vol_i_page_161" id="vol_i_page_161"></a></p> + +<p>Not all of us are able to be out of doors as much as we ought to be, but +all of us spend seven or eight hours out of every twenty-four in sleep, +and this time at least we ought to spend out of doors. I understand that +this is futile advice to give to the very poor. I was poor myself for +many years, and had to put all my clothes on at night in order to keep +warm, and even then I could not always do it. Nevertheless, from the +time I first realized the importance of ventilation I never slept in a +room with a closed window.</p> + +<p>I say, sleep outdoors if you possibly can. You do not have to be afraid +of exposure, for cold will not hurt you if you keep your body in proper +condition. I have slept out in a rubber blanket, with the rain beating +on my head and face; I have spread a rubber blanket on a hummock in the +midst of a swamp, and waked up in the morning with my hair and face +soaked in cold, white fog, but I never caught cold from such things; +there is no harm whatever in dampness or in "night air," if you are in +proper condition. Of course, you may get your ears frostbitten in the +middle of winter, but you can have a sleeping hood to remove that +danger.</p> + +<p>The "nature cure" enthusiasts, who lay so much stress upon an outdoor +life, also insist that the wearing of clothes is a harmful civilized +custom. They urge us to take "sun baths" and to "ventilate the skin." +Now, as a matter of fact, the skin does not breathe, it merely gives out +moisture, and it does not give out any less because we have clothing on +us, provided the clothing is dry and clean, and will absorb moisture. +But bye and bye the clothing becomes loaded with the waste substances +given out by the skin, and then it will absorb no more, and if you do +not change your clothing, no doubt it may have some effect upon health.</p> + +<p>But the principal evil of civilized clothing is that it binds the body +and prevents the free play of the muscles, and, more important yet, +stops the free circulation of the blood. I have already discussed hats, +which are the principal cause of baldness. I will go to the other +extremity of the body, and mention tight shoes, which, strange as it may +seem, cause headaches and colds. You will be able to find a few +civilized men with normal feet, but you will hardly ever find a woman +whose toes are not crowded together and misshapen. I have said that the +human body is one organism, and that it is fed<a name="vol_i_page_162" id="vol_i_page_162"></a> and its health +maintained by the blood-stream; I say now that the circulation of the +blood is one thing, and if you block it at any one place, you block it +everywhere. Of course, not all the blood-stream goes down into the feet, +but some of it does, and if it is clogged in the feet, and the blood +vessels cramped and crowded, there is a certain amount of poison kept in +the system, which the system should have got rid of.</p> + +<p>Why do women wear tight shoes? Because the leisure class members of +their sex have been kept in harems and used as the playthings of men. To +be fragile and delicate was the thing admired by the masters of wealth, +and to have small hands and feet was a sign that women belonged to this +parasite class. Therefore at all hazards women's feet must be kept +small, even at the expense of their health and happiness; and so they +put themselves up on several inches of heels, which cause them to toddle +around like marionettes on a stage, with all their toes crowded down +into a lump.</p> + +<p>Why do men wear tight bands around their scalps, which cause their hair +to drop out, and tight, stiff columns around their necks, which stop the +circulation of the blood into their heads, and cause them to have +headaches instead of ideas? The reason is that for ages the rulers of +the tribe have wished to demonstrate publicly their superiority to the +common herd, which does the menial tasks. In England all gentlemen wear +tall black silk band-boxes on their heads, and in America they have a +choice among several varieties of round tight boxes. All men who work in +offices wear stiffly starched collars and cuffs, as a means of +demonstrating their superiority to the common workers, who have to sweat +at their necks. I think it is not too much to hope that when class +exploitation is done away with, we shall also get rid of these class +symbols, and choose our clothing because it is warm and comfortable, and +not according to the perverted imbecilities of "style."</p> + +<p>The skin gives out perspiration which is greasy; also the skin is +constantly growing, putting out layers of cells which dry up and are +worn off. We need to bathe with soap to remove the grease, and we need +to rub with a towel to brush away the dead cells of the skin, so that +the pores may be kept open. No one is taking care of his body who does +not wash and rub it once every twenty-four hours, and once or twice a +week with warm water and soap. It is often stated<a name="vol_i_page_163" id="vol_i_page_163"></a> that hot baths are +weakening, but I have never found it so; however, I think it is a bad +practice to pamper the body, which should be accustomed to the shock of +cold water. The rule as to bathing, both as to temperature and time, is +simple. If, after the bath and rub-down, your body has reacted and you +feel vigorous and fresh, that bath has done you good. If, on the other +hand, you feel chilled and depressed, then you have been too long in the +water, or its temperature was too low. Every person has to find his own +rules in such matters. The only general rule is that as one grows older +the body reacts less quickly.</p> + +<p>All day, as we work and think, we store up more poisons in our cells +than the body can get rid of, and the time comes when the cells are so +loaded with poisons that we have to stop for a while, and let our +blood-stream clean house. The quantity of sleep one needs is a problem +like that of cold water; each person has to find his own rule. In +general, one needs less and less sleep as one grows older. Infants sleep +the greater part of the time; growing children should sleep ten or +eleven hours, adults seven or eight, and old people, unless they have +let themselves get fat, generally do not want to sleep more than six, +and part of this in short naps. When you sleep, your bodily energies +relax, and you make less heat, therefore you need extra clothing; but +this clothing should never cover the mouth and nose, nor should it be so +heavy as to make breathing a burden. If you are in good condition, it +will do you no harm to be chilly when you sleep, except that you do not +sleep so soundly. Sleeping too much is just as harmful as sleeping too +little. Nature will tell you that. The important thing, as in all other +problems of health, is to have something interesting to think about, +some exciting work to do in the world, and then you will sleep as little +as you have too.<a name="vol_i_page_164" id="vol_i_page_164"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXIV" id="CHAPTER_XXIV"></a>CHAPTER XXIV<br /><br /> +WORK AND PLAY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Deals with the question of exercise, both for the idle and the +overworked.)</p></div> + +<p>In discussing the important question of exercise, there is one +fundamental fact to begin with: that our present civilization divides +men sharply into two classes, those who do not get enough exercise, and +those who get too much. Obviously it would be folly to make the same +recommendations to the two classes.</p> + +<p>I begin with those who get too much exercise. They include a great +number, probably the majority of those who do the manual work of the +world. They include the farmers and the farm-hands, who work from dawn +to sunset, and sometimes by lantern light. They include also the +farmers' wives, the kitchen slaves of whom the old couplet tells:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">"Man's work ends from sun to sun,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: .25em;">But woman's work is never done."</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>I am aware that men have worked that way for countless ages, and yet the +race is still surviving; but I am aware also that men wither up with +rheumatism, and contract chronic diseases of the kidneys and the blood +vessels, consequent upon the creation of greater quantities of fatigue +poisons than the body can regularly eliminate.</p> + +<p>I have very little interest in the past, and none whatever in finding +fault with it. My purpose is to criticize the present for the benefit of +the future, and therefore I say that modern machinery and the whole +development of modern large-scale production make it absolutely +unnecessary that women should slave all their waking hours in kitchens, +or that men should slave all day. I say it is monstrous folly that men +should work for twelve-hour stretches in steel mills, and for ten and +eleven hours in factories and mines. Organized labor has adopted the +slogan, "Eight hours for work, eight hours for sleep, eight hours for +play"; but my slogan is "Four hours for work, four hours for study, +eight hours for sleep, and eight hours for play."<a name="vol_i_page_165" id="vol_i_page_165"></a></p> + +<p>I know, and am prepared to demonstrate to any thinking man, that modern +civilization can produce, not merely all the necessities, but all the +comforts of life for every man, woman and child in the community, by the +expenditure of four hours a day work of the adult, able-bodied men and +women. So to all the wage slaves of the factories and mines, the fields +and the kitchens, I say that too much exercise is what is the matter +with you, and what you need is to get off in a quiet nook in the woods +and read a good novel, not merely for a few hours, but for a few months, +until you get over the effects of capitalist civilization. I know that +not many of you can get away as yet, but I urge you to insist upon +getting away, to fight for the chance to get away; and I will here +suggest a few of the novels for you to read when finally you do get +away. I choose the easy ones, which the dullest and most tired of you +will love; I say, make up your mind to read these thirty-two books +before you die, and do not let the world cheat you out of your chance!</p> + +<p>Mark Twain: A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Charles D. +Stewart: The Fugitive Blacksmith. W. Clark Russell: The Wreck of the +Grosvenor. R. L. Stevenson: Treasure Island, Kidnapped. Jack London: The +Sea Wolf, The Call of the Wild, Martin Eden. Joseph Conrad: Youth. H. G. +Wells: The War of the Worlds, When the Sleeper Wakes, The Sea Lady, The +History of Mr. Polly, The Food of the Gods, The Island of Dr. Moreau. +Upton Sinclair: The Jungle, King Coal, Jimmie Higgins, 100 Per Cent. +Theodore Dreiser: Sister Carrie. George Moore: Esther Waters. Frank +Norris: The Octopus. Brand Whitlock: The Turn of the Balance. De Foe: +Robinson Crusoe. Fielding: Tom Jones, Jonathan Wild the Great. +Thackeray: The Adventures of Barry Lyndon. Marmaduke Pickthall: The +Adventures of Hadji Baba. Blasco Ibanez: The Fruit of the Vine. Frank +Harris: Montes the Matador. Frederik van Eeden: The Quest. Tolstoi: +Resurrection.</p> + +<p>And now for the people who do not get enough exercise. In the armies of +King Cyrus it was the law that every man was required to sweat once +every twenty-four hours, and that is still the law for every business +man and office-worker and writer of books. There is no substitute for +it, and there is no health without it. I have heard Dr. Kellogg say that +the modern woman sends out her health with her washing, and<a name="vol_i_page_166" id="vol_i_page_166"></a> I have +heard the leisure class ladies at the Sanitarium discuss this cryptic +utterance and wonder what he meant by it. I know that there is use +telling leisure class ladies what exercise at the wash-tub would do for +their abdomens and backs. I will only tell them that unless they can +find some kind of vigorous activity which keeps them in a free +perspiration for an hour or two each day, they will never be really +well, and will never bear children without agony and abortion.</p> + +<p>For myself, I have found that the minimum is three or four times a week. +Unless I get that much hard exercise I am soon in trouble. So my advice +to the business man is to take off his coat and collar and turn out and +help his truck-man; my advice to the white collar slave is to get a +part-time job, and dig ditches the rest of the time. To the man who has +cares which pursue him, and likewise to the ardent student and +brain-worker, I say that they should find, not merely exercise, but +play. The distinction between the two things is important. There can be +play that is not exercise, for example cards and chess; and, of course, +there can be exercise that is not play. What you must have is something +that is both play and exercise; something that not merely causes your +heart to beat fast, and your lungs to pump fast, and your sweat glands +to throw out poisons from your body, but something that fully occupies +your mind and gives your higher brain centers a chance to relax.</p> + +<p>Our civilization has very largely destroyed the possibility of play and +the spirit of play. We civilized people no longer know what play is, and +regard the desire to play as something abnormal—a form of vice. We +allow children to play after school hours, and on Saturdays; but for +grown-up, serious-minded men and women to want to play would be almost +as disreputable as for them to want to get drunk. What could foe more +pitiful than the spectacle of tens of thousands of men crowding into our +baseball parks and amusement fields to watch other men play for them! +Imagine, if you can, a crowd of people gathering in a restaurant or +theater to watch other people <i>eat</i> for them! Imagine yourself a man +from Mars, coming down to a world with so many people in want, and +finding whole classes of men forbidden to do any work, under penalty of +disgrace, and compelled, in order to exercise their muscles, to pull on +rubber straps and lift weights and wave dumb-bells and Indian clubs in +the air—methods of expending<a name="vol_i_page_167" id="vol_i_page_167"></a> their muscular energy which are +respectable because they accomplish nothing!</p> + +<p>When I was a boy, I was fond of all kinds of games. I was a good tennis +player, and in the country an incessant hunter and fisherman. When on +the city streets we boys could not find any other game to play, we would +get up on the roofs of the houses and throw clothes-pins and snow-balls +at the "Dagoes" working in the nearby excavations; so we had the fine +game of being chased by the "Dagoes," with the chance, real or +imaginary, of having a knife stuck into us. But then, as I grew older, +and became aware of the pain and misery of the world, I lost my interest +in games, and for ten years or so I never played; I did nothing but +study and write. So my health gave way, and I had the problem of +restoring it, and I spent some twenty years wrestling with this problem, +before I thoroughly convinced myself on the point that there can be no +such thing as sound and permanent health without a certain amount of +play.</p> + +<p>I don't think there is any kind of hard physical work I failed to try, +in the course of my experiments. I rode horseback, and took long walks, +and climbed mountains, and swam, and dug gardens, and chopped down whole +groves of trees and cut them up and carried them to the fireplace. I +have done this latter work for a whole winter in the country, several +hours every day, and it has done my health no good to speak of; I have +been ready for a breakdown at the end of it. The reason is that all the +time I was doing these things with my body, I was going right on working +my brain. While I was swimming or climbing a mountain or galloping on +horseback, I was absorbed in the next chapter of the book I was writing, +so that I literally did not know where I was. I would make up my mind +that I would not think about my work, and would make desperate efforts +not to do so; but it was like walking along the edge of a slippery +ditch—sooner or later I was bound to fall in, and go floundering along, +unable to get out again!</p> + +<p>And the same thing applies to all gymnastic work. I have experimented +with a dozen different systems of exercises, and with all kinds of water +treatments; I have used dumb-bells and Indian clubs and Swedish +gymnastics, MacFadden's exercises in bed, and the Yogi breathing +exercises, and more kinds of queer things than I can remember now; but +for me<a name="vol_i_page_168" id="vol_i_page_168"></a> there is only one solution of the problem, which is to have an +antagonist. It may be a deer I am trying to shoot, or some trout I am +trying to lure out of their holes; it may be some boys I am trying to +beat at football or hockey, or it may be the game I know best and find +most convenient, which is tennis. If it is tennis, then it has to be +someone who can make me work as hard as I know how; for if it is someone +I can beat easily, why, before I have been playing ten minutes, I am +busily working out the next chapter of a book, or answering letters I +have just got in the mail.</p> + +<p>Recently I came upon a book, "The Psychology of Relaxation," by Dr. +Patrick, in which the theory of this is set forth. Civilized man is +working his higher brain centers more than his body can stand; his brain +is running away with him, absorbing a constantly increasing share of his +energies. True relaxation is only possible where the higher brain +centers are lulled, and the back lobes of the brain brought into +activity. One of the means of doing this is alcohol, and that is why +through the ages all races of men have craved to get drunk. There is a +method which is harmless, and does not break down the system, and that +is play. When we become really interested in play, we are as children, +or as primitive man; we do all the things that our race used to do many +ages ago; we hunt and fight, we pit our wits against the wits of our +enemies, and struggle with desperation to get the better of them. If our +play is physical play, if we are absorbed in a game or bodily contest, +then we are exerting and developing all those portions of us which +civilization tends to atrophy and deaden.</p> + +<p>There are people who will dispute with you about Socialism, and ask, how +we are going to provide incentives if we do away with wage slavery. When +you tell them that activity is natural to human beings, and that if +there were no work, men and women would have to make some, they shake +their heads mournfully and tell you about the problem of "human nature." +But consider games and sports: men do not have to work their bodies, yet +they go out and deliberately hunt for trouble! They invent themselves +subtle and complicated games, and are not content until they find people +who can beat them at it, or at any rate can make them work to the limit +of their strength, until they are in a dripping perspiration and +thoroughly exhausted! I may be too optimistic about<a name="vol_i_page_169" id="vol_i_page_169"></a> "human nature," but +I believe that this is the attitude every normal human being takes +toward the powers, both mental and physical, which he possesses; he +wants to use them, and for all they are worth. If you don't believe it, +just take any group of youngsters, give them a baseball and bat, turn +them loose in a vacant lot, and watch them "choose up sides" and fall to +work, screaming and shouting in wild excitement! There are some races of +the earth which do not yet know baseball, but the Filipinos and the +Japanese have learned it, and even the war-worn "Poilus" and the +supercilious "Tommies" condescended to experiment with it. And if you +think it is only physical competition that young human animals enjoy, +try them at putting on a play, or printing a magazine, or conducting a +debate, or building a house—anything whatever that involves healthy +competition, and is related to the big things of life, but without being +for the profit of some exploiter! Get clear the plain and simple +distinction between work and play: play is what you want to do, while +work is what the profit system makes you do!<a name="vol_i_page_170" id="vol_i_page_170"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXV" id="CHAPTER_XXV"></a>CHAPTER XXV<br /><br /> +THE FASTING CURE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Deals with nature's own remedy for disease, and how to make use of +it.)</p></div> + +<p>We have next to consider the various human ailments, what causes them, +and how they can be remedied. As it happens, I know of a cure that comes +pretty near being that impossible thing, a "cure-all." At any rate, it +is so far ahead of all other cures, that a discussion of it will cover +three-fourths of the subject.</p> + +<p>When I was a boy living in New York, there was a man by the name of Dr. +Tanner, who took a forty-day fast. He was on public exhibition at the +time, and was supposed to be watched day and night; the newspapers gave +a great deal of attention to the story, and crowds used to come to gaze +at him. I remember very well the conversations I heard about the matter. +People were quite sure that it couldn't be true. The man must be getting +something to eat on the sly; he must have some nourishment in the water +he drank; no human being could fast more than five or six days without +starving to death.</p> + +<p>In the year 1910 I published in the United States and England a magazine +article telling how on several occasions I had fasted ten or twelve +days, and what I had accomplished by it. I found that I had the same +difficulty to confront as old Dr. Tanner; I received scores of letters +from people who called me a "faker," and I read scores of newspaper +editorials to the same effect. The New York Times published a dispatch +about three young ladies on Long Island who were trying a three-day +fast, and the Times commented editorially to the effect that these young +ladies were "the victims of a shallow and unscrupulous sensationalist."</p> + +<p>The notion that human beings can perish for lack of food in a few days +is deeply rooted in people's minds. Recently a group of eleven Irishmen +in jail set to work to starve themselves to death, as a protest against +British rule in their country. Day after day the newspapers reported the +news<a name="vol_i_page_171" id="vol_i_page_171"></a> from Cork prison, and at about the twentieth day they began to +state that the prisoners were dying, that the priest had been sent for, +that their relatives were gathered on the prison steps. Day after day +such reports continued, through the thirties, and the forties, and the +fifties, and the sixties, and the seventies. One man died on the +eighty-eighth day, and MacSwiney died on the seventy-fourth. The other +nine gave up after ninety-four days and were all restored to health. I +watched carefully the newspaper and magazine comment on this incident, +yet I did not see a single remark on the medical aspects of it; I could +not discover that scientific men had learned anything whatever about the +ability of the body to go without food for long periods.</p> + +<p>Get this clear at the outset: Nobody ever "starved to death" in less +than two months, and it is possible for a fat person to go without food +for as long as three or four months. People who "starve to death" in +shorter times do not die of starvation, but of fright. The first time I +fasted happened to be at the time of the Messina earthquake. I was +walking about, perfectly serene and happy, having been without food for +three days, and I read in my newspaper how the rescue ships had reached +Messina, and found the population ravenous, in the agonies of +starvation, some of the people having been without food for seventy-two +hours! (It sounds so much worse, you see, when you state it in hours.)</p> + +<p>The second point to get clear is that the fast is a physiological +process; that is to say, it is something which nature understands and +carries through in her own serene and efficient way. When you take a +fast, you are not carrying out a freak notion of your own, or of mine; +you are discovering a lost instinct. Every cat and dog knows enough not +to take food when it is ill; it is only in hospitals conducted by modern +medical science that the custom prevails of serving elaborate "trays" to +invalids. I remember a story about a man who made himself a reputation +and a fortune by curing the pet dogs of the rich. These beautiful little +creatures, which sleep between silken covers, and have several servants +to wait upon them, and are fed from gold and silver dishes upon rich and +elaborately cooked foods, fall victim to as many diseases as their +mistresses, and they would be brought to this specialist, who conducted +his dog hospital in an old brickyard. In each one of the compartments of +the brick kiln he would shut up<a name="vol_i_page_172" id="vol_i_page_172"></a> a dog with a supply of fresh water, a +crust of stale bread, a piece of bacon rind, and the sole of an old +shoe; and after a few days he would go back and find that the dog had +eaten the crust of bread, and then he would write to the owner that the +dog was on the high road to recovery. He would go back a few days later +and find that the dog had eaten the piece of bacon rind, and then he +would write that the dog was very nearly cured. He would wait until the +dog had eaten the piece of shoe leather, and then he would write that +the dog was completely cured, and the owner might come and take it away.</p> + +<p>Just what is the process of the fast cure? I do not pretend to know +positively. I can only make guesses, and wait for science to +investigate. I believe that the main source of the diseases of civilized +man is improper nutrition, and the clogging of the system with food +poisons in various stages. And when you fast you do two things: first, +you stop entirely the fresh supply of those food poisons, and second, +you allow the whole of the body's digestive and assimilative tract to +rest—to go to sleep, as it were—so that all the body's energy may go +to other organs. The body carries with it at all times a surplus store +of nutriment, which can be taken up and used by the blood stream, +apparently with much less trouble than is required to convert fresh food +to the body's uses. In other words, the body can feed on its own tissues +more easily than it can feed from the stomach. In the fast you may lose +anywhere from half a pound to two pounds in weight per day, and this +will be taken, first from your store of fat, and then from your muscular +tissues. Every part of your muscular tissue will be taken, before +anything is taken from your vital organs, your nerves or your +blood-stream. So long as there is a particle of muscular material left, +so long as you can make even the slightest movement of one finger, you +are still fasting, and it is only when your muscular tissue is all gone +that you begin at last to starve. So far as I know, the cases of +MacSwiney and the other Irishman are the only cases on record where +fasters have died of starvation.</p> + +<p>What the body does during the fast is quite plain, and can be told by +many symptoms. It begins a thorough house-cleaning, throwing out +poisonous material by every channel. The perspiration and the breath +become offensive, the tongue becomes heavily coated, so that you can +scrape the material<a name="vol_i_page_173" id="vol_i_page_173"></a> off with a knife. I have heard vegetarians explain +this by saying that when the body is living off its own tissues, it is +following a cannibal diet; but that is all nonsense, because you can +live on meat exclusively, and quickly satisfy yourself that none of +these symptoms occurs. It is evident that the body is taking advantage +of the opportunity to get rid of waste products; and this will go on for +ten days, for twenty days, in some cases for as long as forty or fifty +days; and then suddenly occurs a strange thing: in spite of the +"cannibal diet" the symptoms all come to a sudden end. The tongue +clears, the breath becomes sweet, the appetite suddenly awakens.</p> + +<p>During the period of a normal fast you lose all interest in food. You +almost forget that there is such a thing as eating; you can look at food +without any more desire for it than you have to swallow marbles and +carpet tacks. But then suddenly appetite returns, as I have explained, +and you find that you can think of nothing but food. This is what +students of the subject describe as a "complete fast," and while I do +not want to go to extremes and say that the "complete fast" will cure +every case of every disease, I can certainly say this: in the letters +which have come to me from people who tried the fast at my suggestion, +there are cases of every kind of common disease. In my book, "The +Fasting Cure," I give the results in cases reported to me after the +publication of my first magazine article. I quote two paragraphs:</p> + +<p>"The total number of fasts taken was 277, and the average number of days +was six. There were 90 of five days or over, 51 of ten days or over, and +six of 30 days or over. Out of the 119 person who wrote to me, 100 +reported benefit, and 17 no benefit. Of these 17 about half give wrong +breaking of the fast as the reason for the failure. In cases where the +cure had not proved permanent, about half mentioned that the recurrence +of the trouble was caused by wrong eating, and about half of the rest +made this quite evident by what they said. Also it is to be noted that +in the cases of the 17 who got no benefit, nearly all were fasts of only +three or four days.</p> + +<p>"Following is the complete list of diseases benefited—45 of the cases +having been diagnosed by physicians: indigestion (usually associated +with nervousness), 27; rheumatism, 5; colds, 8; tuberculosis, 4; +constipation, 14; poor circulation, 3;<a name="vol_i_page_174" id="vol_i_page_174"></a> headaches, 5; anaemia, 3; +scrofula, 1; bronchial trouble, 5; syphilis, 1; liver trouble, 5; +general debility, 5; chills and fever, 1; blood poisoning, 1; ulcerated +leg, 1; neurasthenia, 6; locomotor ataxia, 1; sciatica, 1; asthma, 2; +excess of uric acid, 1; epilepsy, 1; pleurisy, 1; impaction of bowels, +1; eczema, 2; catarrh, 6; appendicitis, 3; valvular disease of heart, 1; +insomnia, 1; gas poisoning, 1; grippe, 1; cancer, 1."</p> + +<p>There are many diseases with many causes, and some yield more quickly +than others to the fast. In the first group I put the diseases of the +digestive and alimentary tract. Stomach and bowel troubles, and the +nervous disorders occasioned by these, stop almost immediately when you +fast. Next come disorders of the blood-stream, which are generally a +second stage of digestive troubles. Everything immediately due to +impurities of the blood, pimples, boils, and ulcers, inflammation, badly +healing wounds, etc., respond to a few days of fasting as to the magic +touch of the old-time legends. When it comes to diseases caused by germ +infections, you have a double aspect of the problem, and must have a +double method of attack. I would not like to say that fasting could cure +such a disease as sleeping sickness, to the germs of which our systems +are not accustomed, and against which they may well be helpless. On the +other hand, in the case of common infections, such as colds and sore +throats, the fast is again the touch of magic. Having been plagued a +great deal by these ailments in past times, I am accustomed to say that +I would not trade my knowledge of fasting for everything else that I +know about health.</p> + +<p>The first thing you must do if you want to take a fast is to read the +literature on the subject and make up your mind that the experiment will +do you no injury. You should also try to get your relatives to make up +their minds, because you are nervous when you are fasting, and cannot +withstand the attacks of the people around you, who will go into a panic +and throw you into a panic. As I said before, it is quite possible for +people to die of panic, but I do not believe that anybody ever died of a +fast. I have known of two or three cases of people dying while they were +fasting, but I feel quite certain that the fast did not cause their +death; they would have died anyhow. You must bear in mind that among the +people who try the fast, a great many are in a desperate condition; some +have been given up by the doctors,<a name="vol_i_page_175" id="vol_i_page_175"></a> and if now and then one of these +should die, we may surely say that they died in spite of the fast, and +not because of it. There is no physician who can save every patient, and +it would be absurd to expect this. I have read scores of letters from +people who were at the point of death from such "fatal" diseases as +Bright's disease, sclerosis of the liver, and fatty degeneration of the +heart, and were literally snatched out of the jaws of death by beginning +a fast. I would not like to guess just what percentage of dying people +in our hospitals might be saved if the doctors would withdraw all food +from them, but I await with interest the time when medical science will +have the intelligence to try that simple experiment and report the +results.</p> + +<p>Just the other day in the Los Angeles county jail, a chiropractor went +on hunger strike, as a protest against imprisonment, and he fasted 41 +days. Then he broke his fast, the reason being given that his pulse was +down to 54, and he was afraid of dying. I smiled to myself. The normal +pulse is 70. I have taken my pulse many times at the end of a ten-day +fast, and it has been as low as 32, and I am not dead yet, and if I wait +to die from the symptoms of a fast, I expect to live a long time indeed!</p> + +<p>The first time I fasted, I felt very weak, and lay around and hardly +cared to lift my head; if I walked from my bed to the lawn, I was tired +in the legs. But since then I have grown used to fasting. I have fasted +for a week probably twenty or thirty times, and on such occasions I have +gone about my business as if nothing were happening. Of course I would +not try to play tennis, or to climb a mountain, but it is a fact that on +the seventh day of a fast in New York, I climbed the five or six flights +of stairs to the top of the Metropolitan Opera House, and felt no ill +effects from doing this. I climbed slowly, and was careful not to tire +myself. The simple rule is not to have anything that you must do on the +fast, and then do what you feel like doing. Lie down and rest, and read +a book, and take as much exercise as you find you enjoy. Keep your mind +quiet and free from worries, and lock out of the house everybody who +tells you that your heart is going to stop beating in the next few +minutes, and that you must have an injection of strychnine to start it, +and some beefsteak and fried onions to "restore your strength." Give +yourself up to the care of your wise<a name="vol_i_page_176" id="vol_i_page_176"></a> old mother nature, who will attend +to your heart just as securely and serenely as she attended to it in the +days before you were born.</p> + +<p>By fasting I mean that you take no food whatever. I know some nature +cure teachers who practice what they call a "fruit fast." All I know is +that if I eat nothing but fruit, I soon have my stomach boiling with +fermentation, and also I suffer with hunger; whereas, if I take a +complete fast, I promptly forget all about food. You must drink all the +water you can on the fast. This helps nature with her house-cleaning; it +is well to drink a glass of water every half hour at least. Do not try +to go without water, and then write me that the fasting cure is a +failure. Also please do not write and ask me if it will be fasting if +you take just a little crackers and milk, or some soup, or something +else that you think doesn't count!</p> + +<p>I recommend a dose of laxative to clean out the system at the beginning +of a fast, because the bowels are apt to become sluggish at once, and +the quicker you get the system cleansed, the better. It does no good to +take laxatives if you are going to pile in more food, but if you are +going to fast, that is a different matter. You should take a full warm +enema every day during the fast, so long as it brings any results. There +are some people whose bowels are so frightfully clogged that I have +known the enema to bring results even in the second and third weeks. On +the other hand, if there is no solid matter to be removed, a small enema +every day will suffice. Take a warm bath every day; and needless to say, +you should get all the fresh air you can, and should sleep as much as +you can. You may have difficulty in sleeping, because the fast is apt to +make you nervous and wakeful. I have known people who could not fast +because they could not sleep, and I have taught them a little trick, to +put a hot water bottle at the feet, and another on the abdomen, to draw +the blood away from the head. So they would quickly fall asleep, and +they got great benefit from their fasts.</p> + +<p>You should supply yourself with good music if you can, and with plenty +of good reading matter. You will be amazed to find how active your mind +becomes; perhaps you had never known before what a mind you had. Your +blood has always been so clogged with food poisons that you didn't<a name="vol_i_page_177" id="vol_i_page_177"></a> know +you could think. My three act play, "The Nature Woman," was conceived +and written in two days and a half on a fast; but I do not recommend +this kind of thing—on the contrary, I strongly urge against it, because +if you work your brain on a fast, you do not get the good from your +fast, and do not recover so quickly. Put off all your problems until you +have got your health back, and seek only to divert your mind while +fasting.<a name="vol_i_page_178" id="vol_i_page_178"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXVI" id="CHAPTER_XXVI"></a>CHAPTER XXVI<br /><br /> +BREAKING THE FAST</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses various methods of building up the body after a fast, +especially the milk diet.)</p></div> + +<p>There remains the question of how to break the fast, and this is the +most important part of the problem. You may undo all the good of your +fast by breaking it wrong, and you are a thousand times as apt to kill +yourself then, as while you are fasting. When your hunger comes back, it +comes back with a rush, and some people have not the will power to +control it.</p> + +<p>I do not advocate a complete fast in any case except of serious chronic +disease, and then only under the advice of someone with experience; but +I advocate a short fast of a week or ten days for almost every common +ailment, and I know that such a fast will help, even where it may not +completely cure. You may go on fasting so long as you are quiet and +happy; but when you find you are becoming too weak for comfort, or for +the peace of mind of your family physician and your friends, you may +break your fast, and show them that it is possible to restore your +strength and body weight, and then they won't bother so much when you +try it again! Take nothing but liquid foods in the breaking of a fast; I +recommend the juices of fruits and tomatoes, also meat broths. If you +have fasted a week or two, take a quarter of a glass; if you have fasted +a month, take a tablespoonful, and wait and see what the results are. +Remember that your whole alimentary tract is out of action, and give it +a chance to start up slowly. Take small quantities of liquid food every +two hours for the first day. Then you can begin taking larger +quantities, and on the next day you can try some milk, or a soft poached +egg, or the pulp of cooked apples or prunes. Do not take any solid food +until you are quite sure you can digest it, and then take only a very +little. Do not take any starchy food until the third day.</p> + +<p>I have known people to break these rules. I knew a<a name="vol_i_page_179" id="vol_i_page_179"></a> man who broke his +fast on hamburg steak, and had to be helped out with a stomach pump. +Once I broke a week's fast with a plate of rich soup, because I was at a +friend's house and there was nothing else, and I yielded to the claims +of hospitality, and made myself ill and had to fast for several days +longer.</p> + +<p>The easiest way to break a fast is upon a milk diet. I have seen +hundreds of people take this diet, and very few who did not get benefit. +The first time I fasted, which was twelve days, I lost 17 pounds, and I +took the milk diet for 24 days thereafter, and gained 32 pounds. I took +it at MacFadden's Sanitarium, where I had every attention. Since then, I +have many times tried to take a milk diet by myself, but have never been +able to get it to agree with me. I do not know how to explain this fact; +I state it, to show how hard it is to lay down general rules. On the +milk diet you take into your system two or three times as much food as +you can assimilate, and this is a violation of all my diet rules; but it +appears that the bacteria which thrive in milk produce lactic acid, +which is not harmful to the system, and if you do not take other foods +you may safely keep the system flooded with milk.</p> + +<p>After a fast you should begin with small quantities of milk, and by the +third day you may be taking a full glass of warm milk every half hour or +every twenty minutes, until you have taken seven or eight quarts per +day. It is better to take it warm, but sometimes people take it just as +well without warming. Dr. Porter, who has a book on the milk diet, +insists upon complete rest, and makes his patients stay in bed. +MacFadden, on the other hand, recommends gymnastics in the morning +before the milk, and during the afternoon he recommends a rest from the +milk for a couple of hours, followed by abdominal exercises to keep the +bowels open. This is very important during a fast, because you are +taking great quantities of material into your system and it must not be +permitted to clog. Therefore take an enema daily, if necessary to a free +movement. Also take a warm bath daily. Take the juice of oranges and +lemons if you crave them.</p> + +<p>Upon one thing everyone who has had experience with the milk diet +agrees, and that is the necessity of absolute<a name="vol_i_page_180" id="vol_i_page_180"></a> mental rest. If you +become excited, or nervous, or angry on a milk diet, you may turn all +the contents of your stomach into hard curds, and may put yourself into +convulsions. The wonderful thing about the milk diet is the state of +physical and mental bliss it makes possible. It is the ideal way of +breaking a fast, because it leaves you no chance to get hungry; you have +all the food you want, and your system is bathed in happiness, a sense +of peace and well-being which is truly marvelous and not to be +described. You gain anywhere from half a pound to two pounds a day, and +you feel that you have never before in your life known what perfect +health could be. The fast sets you a new standard, you discover how +nature meant you to enjoy life, and never again are you content with +that kind of half existence with which you managed to worry along before +you discovered this remedy.</p> + +<p>But let me hasten to add that I do not recommend the fast as a regular +habit of life. The fast is an emergency measure, to enable the body to +cleanse itself and to cure disease. When you have got your body clean +and free from disease, it is your business to keep it that way, and you +should apply your reason to the problem of how to live so that you will +not have to fast. If you find that you continue to have ailments, then +you must be eating wrongly, or overworking, or committing some other +offense against nature; either that, or else you must have some organic +trouble—a bone in your spine out of place, as the osteopaths tell you, +or your eyes out of focus, or your appendix twisted and infected. I do +not claim that the fasting cure will supplant the surgeons and the +oculists and the dentists. It will not mend your bones if you break +them, and it will not repair your teeth that are already decayed; but it +will help to keep your teeth from decaying in the future, and it will +help you to prepare for a surgical operation, and to recover from it +more quickly. I had to undergo an operation for rupture a couple of +years ago, and I fasted for two days before the operation, and for three +days after it, and I had no particle of nausea from the ether, and was +able to tend to my mail the day after the operation.</p> + +<p>There is one disease for which I hesitate to recommend the fast, and +that is tuberculosis, because I have been told of cases in which the +patient lost weight and did not recover<a name="vol_i_page_181" id="vol_i_page_181"></a> it. However, in my tabulation +of 277 cases, you will note four cases of tuberculosis, and in my book +is given a letter from a patient who claimed great benefit. If I had the +misfortune to contract tuberculosis, I would take a three or four day +fast, followed by a milk diet for a long period. The milk diet is +pleasant to take, and it cannot possibly do any harm. If it did not +effect a cure, I would try the Salisbury treatment—that is, lean meat +ground up and medium cooked, and nothing else, except an abundance of +hot water between meals. Prof. Irving Fisher wrote me that there is +urgent need of experiment to determine proper diet in tuberculosis; and +until these experiments have been made, we can only grope. I am quite +sure that the "stuffing system," ordinarily used by doctors, is a tragic +mistake.</p> + +<p>In the case of any other disease whatever, even though I might take +medical or surgical treatment, I would supplement this by a fast, +because there is no kind of treatment which does not succeed better with +the blood in good condition. In the case of emergencies, accidents, +wounds, etc., I would rest assured that recovery would be more prompt if +I were fasting. When David Graham Phillips was shot, I wrote a letter to +the New York Call, saying that his doctors had killed him, because they +had fed him while he was lying in a critical condition in the hospital. +To take nutriment into the body under such circumstances is the greatest +of blunders.</p> + +<p>The fast will help children, just as it helps adults, only they do not +need to fast so long. It will help the aged and make them feel young. +(You need not be afraid to fast, no matter how old you are.) It is, of +course, an immediate cure for fatness, and strange as it may seem, it is +also a cure for unnatural thinness. People with ravenous appetites are +just as apt to be thin as to be fat, because it is not what you eat that +builds up your body, but only what you assimilate, and if you eat too +much, you can make it impossible to assimilate anything properly. If you +take a fast and break it carefully, your body will come to its normal +weight, and all your functions to their normal activity.</p> + +<p>A physician wrote me, taking me to task for listing among the cures +reported in my tabulation a case of locomotor ataxia. This disease, he +explained, is caused because a portion of a nerve has been entirely +destroyed, and it is a disease that is<a name="vol_i_page_182" id="vol_i_page_182"></a> absolutely and positively and +forever incurable. I answered that I knew this to be the teaching of +present day medical science, but I invited him to consider for a moment +what happens in nature. When a crab loses a claw, we do not take it as a +matter of course that the crab must go about with one claw for the +balance of its life; nature will make that crab another claw. Man has +lost the power of replacing a lost leg, but he stills retains the power +of replacing tissue which has been cut away by a surgeon's knife, and +medical science takes this as a matter of course. How shall anybody say +that nature has forever lost the power of rebuilding a bit of nervous +tissue? How shall anyone say that if the blood-stream is cleansed of +poisons, and the energy of the whole body restored, one of the results +may not be the repairing of a broken nerve connection? I invite my +readers who have ailments, and especially I invite all medical men among +my readers, to make a fair test of the fasting cure. The results will +surprise them, and they will quickly be forced to revise their methods +of treating illness.<a name="vol_i_page_183" id="vol_i_page_183"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXVII" id="CHAPTER_XXVII"></a>XXVII<br /><br /> +DISEASES AND CURES</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses some of the commoner human ailments, and what is known +about their cause and cure.)</p></div> + +<p>I begin with the commonest of all troubles, known as a "cold." This name +implies that the cause of the trouble lies in exposure or chill. All the +grandmothers of the world are agreed about this. They have a phrase—or +at least they had it when I was a boy: "You will catch your death." +Every time I went out in the rain, every time I played with wet feet, or +sat in a draft, or got under a cold shower, I would hear the formula, +"You will catch your death."</p> + +<p>And, on the other hand, there are the "health cranks," who declare +vehemently that the name "cold" is a misnomer and a trap for people's +thoughts. Cold has nothing to do with it, they say, and point to arctic +explorers who frequently get frozen to death, but do not "catch cold" +until they get back into the warm rooms of civilization. As for drafts, +the "health cranks" aver that a draft is merely "fresh air moving"; +which is supposed to settle the matter. However, when you come to think +about it, you realize that a cyclone is likewise merely "fresh air +moving," so you have not decided the question by a phrase.</p> + +<p>While I was writing these chapters on health I contracted a severe +cold—which was a joke on me. The history of this cold is as clear in my +mind as anything human can be, and it will serve for an illustration, +showing how much truth the grandmothers have on their side, and how much +the "health cranks" have.</p> + +<p>To begin with, I had been overworking. All sorts of appeals come to me; +hundreds of people write me letters, and I cannot bear to leave them +unanswered. I accepted calls to speak, and invitations where I had to +eat a lot of stuff of which my reason disapproves; so one morning I woke +up with a slight sore throat. I fasted all day, and by evening felt all +right. But there came another call, and I consented to take a long +automobile ride on a cold and rainy night, and<a name="vol_i_page_184" id="vol_i_page_184"></a> when I got back home, +after five or six hours, I was thoroughly chilled, and my "cold" came on +during the night.</p> + +<p>This explanation will, I imagine, be satisfactory to all the +grandmothers of the world. All the dear, good grandmothers know that an +automobile ride on a cold, rainy night is enough to give any man "his +death." But listen, grandmothers! I have lain out watching for deer all +night in the late fall, with only a thin blanket to cover me, and gotten +up so stiff with cold that I could hardly move; yet I did not "catch +cold." When I was a youth, I have ridden a bicycle twenty miles to the +beach in April, with snow on the ground, and plunged into the surf and +swam, and then ridden home again. I have bathed in the sea when I had to +run a quarter of a mile in a bathing suit along a frost-covered pier, +and with an icy wind blowing through my bones; yet I never took cold +from that, and never got anything but a feeling of exhilaration. So it +must be that there is some reason why exposure causes colds at one time +and not at another.</p> + +<p>The explanation takes you over to the "health cranks." They understand +that your blood-stream must be clogged, your bodily tone reduced by bad +air and lack of exercise, and more especially by over-eating, or by an +improperly balanced diet. But then most of them go to extremes, and +insist that the automobile ride and the chilled condition of my body had +nothing to do with my cold. But I know otherwise—I have watched the +thing happen so often. In times when I was run down, the slightest +exposure would cause me a cold, literally in a few minutes. I have got +myself a sore throat going out to the wood-pile on a winter day with +nothing on my head. I have got a cold by sitting still with wet feet, or +by sitting in a draft on a warm summer day, when I had been perspiring a +little. How to explain this I am not sure, but my guess is that you +drive the blood away from the surface of the body at a time when it is +weakened and exposed to infection, and you drive away the army of the +white corpuscles, and give the battlefield of your body to the germs.</p> + +<p>I know there are nature curists who argue that germs have nothing to do +with disease; but they have never been able to convince me—germs are +too real, and too many, and too easy to watch. If you leave a piece of +meat exposed to the air in warm temperature, the germs in the air will +settle<a name="vol_i_page_185" id="vol_i_page_185"></a> upon it and begin to feed upon it and to multiply; the meat, +being dead, is powerless to protect itself. But your nose and throat are +also meat, and just as good food for the germs. The only difference is +that this meat is alive, there is a living blood-stream circulating +through it, and several score billions of the body's own kind of germs, +the blood corpuscles. If these blood corpuscles are sound and properly +nourished, and are brought to the place of infection, they are able to +destroy all the common germs; so it is that you do not have diseases, +but instead have health. But your health always implies a struggle of +your organism against other organisms, and it is the business of your +reason to watch your body and give all the help you can in protecting +it. Coughs and colds, sore throats and headaches, are the first warnings +that your defenses are being weakened. As a rule these ailments are not +serious in themselves, but they are signs of a wrong condition, and if +you neglect this condition, pretty soon you will find that you have to +deal with something deadly.</p> + +<p>My cure for a cold is to take an enema and a laxative, eat nothing for +twenty-four hours, and drink plenty of water. If you have a severe cold +or sore throat, you will be wise to lie in bed for a day or two, by an +open window. You may also use sprays and gargles if you wish, but you +will find them of little use, because the germs are deep in your mucous +membranes, and cannot all be reached from the outside. In the old sad +days of my ignorance I would get a cold, and go to the doctor, and have +my throat and nose pumped full of black and green and yellow and purple +liquids, which did me absolutely no good whatever; the cold would stay +on for two or three weeks, sometimes for eight or ten weeks, and I would +be miserable, utterly desperate. I was dying by inches, and not one of +the doctors could tell me why.</p> + +<p>The next most common ailment is a headache, and this means poisons in +your blood-stream. It may be from improper diet, from alcohol, or drugs, +or bad air, or nervous excitement. If it is none of these things, then +you should begin to look for some organic difficulty, eye-strain, for +example, or perhaps defects in the spine. The osteopaths and the +chiropractors specialize on the spine, and have made important +discoveries. Their doctrine is, in brief, that the nervous force which +directs the blood-stream is carried to<a name="vol_i_page_186" id="vol_i_page_186"></a> the organs of the body by nerves +which leave the spinal cord through openings between the vertebrae. If +any of these openings are pinched, you have a diminished nerve supply, +which means ill-health in that part of the body to which the nerve +leads. That such trouble can be corrected by straightening the bones of +the spine, seems perfectly reasonable; but like most people with a new +idea, the discoverers proceed to carry it to absurd extremes. I have +before me an official chiropractic pamphlet which states that vertebral +displacement is "the physical and perpetuating cause of ninety-five per +cent of all cases of disease; the remaining five per cent being due to +subluxations of other skeletal segments." Naturally people who believe +this will devote nearly all their study to the bones and the nervous +system. But surely, there are other parts of your body which are +necessary besides bones and nerves! And what if some of these parts +happen to be malformed or defective? What if your eyes do not focus +properly, and you are continually wearing out the optic nerve, thus +giving yourself headaches and neurasthenia? What if you have an appendix +that has been twisted and malformed from birth, and is a center of +infection so long as it remains in the body?</p> + +<p>Several years ago I had an experience with the appendix, from which I +learned something about one of the commonest of human ailments, +constipation, or sluggishness of the bowels. This is a cause of +innumerable chronic ailments grouped under the head of +auto-intoxication, or the poisoning of the body by the absorption into +the system of the products of fermentation and decay in the bowels. The +bowels should move freely two or three times every day, and the +movements should be soft. I suffered from constipation for some twenty +years, and tried, I think, every remedy known both to science and to +crankdom. In the beginning the doctors gave me drugs which by irritating +the intestinal walls cause them to pour out quantities of water, and +hurry the irritating substances down the intestinal tract. That is all +right for an emergency; if you have swallowed a poison, or food which is +spoiled, or if you have overeaten and are ill, get your system cleaned +out by any and every device. But if you habitually swallow mild poisons, +which is what all laxatives are, you weaken the intestinal tract, and +you have to take more and more of these poisons, and you get less +results. We may set down as positive<a name="vol_i_page_187" id="vol_i_page_187"></a> the statement that drugs are not a +remedy for constipation.</p> + +<p>Next comes diet. Eat the rough and bulky foods, say the nature curists, +and stimulate the intestinal walls to activity. I tried that. I listened +to the extreme enthusiasts, and boiled whole wheat and ate it, and +consumed quantities of bran biscuit, and of a Japanese seaweed which Dr. +Kellogg prepares, and of petroleum oil, and even the skins of oranges, +which are most uncomfortable eating, I assure you. I would eat things +like this until I got myself a case of diarrhea—and so was cured of +constipation for a time! Strange as it may seem to you, there are even +people who tell you to eat sand. I listened to them, and ate many +quarts.</p> + +<p>Then there is exercise. MacFadden taught me a whole series of exercises +for developing the muscles of the abdominal walls and the back, which +are greatly neglected by civilized man. The fundamental cause of +constipation is a sluggish life, and to exercise our bodies is a duty; +but to me it was always an agony of boredom to lie on a bed and wiggle +my abdomen for a quarter of an hour. The same thing applies to hot water +treatments, which are effective, but a nuisance and a waste of time. I +never could keep them up except when I was in trouble.</p> + +<p>Three or four years ago I began to notice a continual irritating pain in +my right side, which I quickly realized must lie in the appendix. I +tried massage, and hot and cold water treatments, and my favorite +remedy, a week's fast. The pain disappeared, but it returned, so finally +I decided, to the dismay of my physical culture friends, to have the +appendix out. For years I had been reading the statements of nature +curists, that the appendix is an important and vital part of the body, +which pours an oil or something into the intestinal tract, and so helps +to prevent constipation. Well, evidently my appendix wasn't doing its +job, so I took it to a good surgeon. What I found was that it had been +twisted and malformed from birth, so that it was a center of continuous +infection. From the time I had that operation, I have never had to think +about the subject of constipation. This experience suggests to me how +easy it is for people to make statements about health which have no +relationship to facts.</p> + +<p>I do not recommend promiscuous surgery, and I perfectly well realize +that if human beings would take proper care of their health, the great +proportion of surgical operations would<a name="vol_i_page_188" id="vol_i_page_188"></a> be unnecessary. I realize, +also, that surgeons get paid by the job, and therefore have a money +interest in operating, and it is perfectly futile to expect that none of +them will ever be influenced by the profit motive. Nevertheless, it is +true that sometimes surgical operations are necessary, and that by +standing a little temporary inconvenience you can save yourself a +life-time of discomfort.</p> + +<p>Take, for example, rupture. The human body has here a natural weakness, +from which there results a dangerous and uncomfortable affliction. +Hundreds of thousands of men are going around all their lives wearing +elaborate and expensive trusses which are almost, if not entirely +useless, and trying advertised "cures" which are entirely fakes. An +operation takes an hour or two, and two or three weeks in bed, and when +our government drafted its young men into the army and found that +fourteen in every thousand of them had rupture, it shipped them into the +hospitals wholesale and sewed them up. It happens that rupture affords +one case where scar tissue is stronger than natural tissue, and there +were practically no returns from the great number of army cases.</p> + +<p>Likewise you find extreme statements repeated concerning the evils of +vaccination; but if you will read Parkman's "History of the Jesuits in +North America," you will see the horrible conditions under which the +Indians lived in the United States—noble savages, you understand, +entirely uncontaminated by civilized white men, and whole populations +regularly wiped out every few years by epidemics of smallpox. That these +epidemics ceased was due to the discovery that by infecting the body +with a mild form of the disease, it could be made to develop substances +which render it immune to the deadly form. Here in California we have a +law which makes vaccination for school children optional, and so we may +some day have another epidemic to test the theories of the +anti-vaccinationists.</p> + +<p>I know, of course, the dreadful stories of people who have been given +syphilis and other diseases by impure vaccines. I don't know whether +such stories are true; but I do know that people who live in houses are +sometimes killed by earthquakes and by lightning, yet we do not cease to +live in houses because of this chance. It seems to me that the remedy +for such vaccination evils is not to abolish vaccination,<a name="vol_i_page_189" id="vol_i_page_189"></a> but to take +more care in the manufacture of our vaccines.</p> + +<p>This danger is removed by using vaccines which are sterile, and are made +especially for each person. Germs are taken from the sick person, and +injected into an animal. The body of the animal develops with great +rapidity the "anti-bodies" necessary to resistance to the germs; and as +these "anti-bodies" are chemical products, not affected by heat, we can +take a serum from the animal, sterilize it, and then inject it into the +system of the patient, thus increasing resistance to the disease. I +admit that the best way to increase such resistance is to take care of +your health; but sometimes we confront an emergency, and must use +emergency remedies. We have serums that really cure diphtheria and +meningitis, and one that will prevent lock-jaw; anyone who has ever seen +with his own eyes how the deadly membranes of diphtheria melt away as a +result of an injection, will be less dogmatic about the efforts of +science to combat disease.</p> + +<p>Of course it is much pleasanter if you can destroy the source of the +disease, and keep it from getting into the human body. Every few years +the southern part of our country used to be devastated by yellow fever +epidemics. Every kind of weird and fantastic remedy was tried; people +would go around with sponges full of vinegar hung under their noses; +they would burn the clothing and bedding of those who died of the +disease; they would wear gloves when they went shopping, so as not to +touch the money with their hands. But at last medical experimenters +traced the disease to a certain kind of mosquito, and now, if we drain +the swamps and screen our houses and stay in doors after sundown, we do +not get yellow fever, nor malaria either. In the same way, if we keep +our bodies clean with soap and hot water, we do not get bitten by lice, +and so do not die of typhus. If we take pains with our drains and water +supply, so that human excrement does not get into it, and if we destroy +the filth-carrying housefly, we do not have epidemics of typhoid.</p> + +<p>But under conditions of battle it is not possible for men to take these +precautions, and so when they go into the army they get a dose of +typhoid serum. And this illustrates the difference between a true or +hygienic remedy for disease, and a temporary or emergency remedy. If you +say that you want to abolish war, and with it the need for typhoid<a name="vol_i_page_190" id="vol_i_page_190"></a> +vaccination, I cheerfully agree with you in this. All that I am trying +to do is to point out the folly of flying to extremes, and rejecting any +remedy which may help. What is the use of making the flat statement that +vaccinations and serums never aid in the cure of disease, when any man +can see with his own eyes the proof that they do? In the Spanish war, +before typhoid vaccination, many times more soldiers died of this +disease than died of bullets; but in the late war there was practically +no typhoid at all in the army camps. On the other hand, it was noticed +that the men who had just come in, and who therefore had just been +vaccinated, were considerably more susceptible to influenza; which shows +that vaccination does reduce the body condition for a time. The reader +may say that in this case I am trying to sit on both sides of the fence; +but the truth is that I am trying to keep an open mind, and to consider +all the facts, and to avoid making rash statements.</p> + +<p>One of the statements you hear most frequently is that drugs can never +remedy disease, or help in remedying it. Now, I abhor the drugging +system of the orthodox medical men; I have talked with them, and heard +them talk with one another, and I know that they will mix up half a +dozen different substances, in the vague hope that some one of them will +have some effect. Even when they know definitely the effects they are +producing, they are in many cases merely suppressing symptoms. On the +other hand, however, it is a fact that medical science has had for a +generation or two a specific which destroys the germs of one disease in +the blood, without at the same time injuring the blood itself. That +disease is malaria, and the drug is quinine. Of course, the way to avoid +malaria is to drain the swamps; but you cannot do that all at once, nor +can you always screen your house and stay in at sundown. When you first +go into a country, you have no house to screen, and some emergency will +certainly arise that exposes you to mosquito bites. So you will need +quinine, and will be foolish not to use it, and know how to use it.</p> + +<p>Recently medical chemists discovered another remedy, this time for +syphilis. It is called salvarsan, and while it does not always cure, it +frequently does. In laboratories today men are working over the problem +of constructing a combination of molecules which will destroy the germ +of sleeping sickness, without at the same time injuring the blood.<a name="vol_i_page_191" id="vol_i_page_191"></a> If +they find it, they will save hundreds of millions of lives. I do not see +why we cannot recognize such a possibility, while at the same time +making use of physical culture, of diet and fasting.</p> + +<p>When the manuscript of this book was sent to the printer, there appeared +in this place a paragraph telling of the work of Dr. Albert Abrams of +San Francisco, in the diagnosis and cure of disease by means of +radio-active vibrations. As the book is going to press, the writer finds +himself in San Francisco, attending Dr. Abrams' clinics; and so he finds +it possible to give a more extended account of some fascinating +discoveries, which seem destined to revolutionize medical science. If I +were to tell all that I have seen with my own eyes in the last twelve +days, I fear the reader would find his powers of credulity +overstretched, so I shall content myself with trying to tell, in very +sober and cautious language, the theory upon which Abrams is working, +and the technic which he has evolved.</p> + +<p>Modern science has demonstrated that all matter is simply the activity +of electrons, minute particles of electric force. This is a statement +which no present-day physicist would dispute. The best evidence appears +to indicate that a molecule of matter is a minute reproduction of the +universe, a system of electrons whirling about a central nucleus. No eye +has ever beheld an electron, for it is billions of times smaller than +anything the microscope makes visible; but we can see the effects of +electronic activity, and all modern books of physics give photographs of +such. It is possible to determine the vibration rates of electrons, and +to Dr. Abrams occurred the idea of determining the vibration rates of +diseased tissue and disease germs. He discovered that it was invariably +the same; not merely does all cancerous material, for example, yield the +same rate, but the blood of a person suffering from cancer yields that +rate, at all times and under all circumstances. The vibration of cancer, +of tuberculosis, of syphilis—each is different, uniform and invariable. +Likewise in the blood are other vibrations, uniform and dependable, +which reveal the sex and age of the patient, the virulence of the +disease and the period of its duration—yes, and even the location in +the body, if there be some definite infected area. So here is a modern +miracle, an infallible device for the diagnosis of disease. Dr. Abrams +does not have to see the patient; all he has to have is a drop of blood +on a piece of white blotting paper, and he sits in his laboratory and +tells all about it,<a name="vol_i_page_192" id="vol_i_page_192"></a> and somewhere several thousand miles away—in +Toronto or Boston or New Orleans—a surgeon operates and finds what he +has been told is there!</p> + +<p>And that is only the beginning of the wonder; because, says Abrams, if +you know the vibration rate of the electrons of germs, you can destroy +those germs. It used to be a favorite trick of Caruso to tap a glass and +determine its musical note, and then sing that note at the glass and +shatter it to bits. It is well known that horses, trotting swiftly on a +bridge, have sometimes coincided in their step with the vibration of the +bridge and thus have broken it down. On that same principle this wizard +of the electron introduces into your body radio-activity of a certain +rate—and shall I say that he cures cancer and syphilis and tuberculosis +of many years standing in a few treatments? I will not say that, because +you would not and could not believe me. I will content myself with +telling what my wife and I have been watching, twice a day for the past +twelve days.</p> + +<p>The scene is a laboratory, with rows of raised seats at one side for the +physicians who attend the clinic. There is a table, with the instruments +of measurement, and Dr. Abrams sits beside it, and before him stands a +young man stripped to the waist. The doctor is tapping upon the abdomen +of this man, and listening to the sounds. You will find this the +weirdest part of the whole procedure, for you will naturally assume that +this young man is being examined, and will be dazed when some one +explains that the patient is in Toronto or Boston or New Orleans, and +that this young man's body is the instrument which the doctor uses in +the determining of the vibration rates of the patient's blood. Dr. +Abrams tried numerous instruments, but has been able to find nothing so +sensitive to electronic activity as a human body. He explains to his +classes that the spinal cord is composed of millions of nerve fibres of +different vibration rates; hence a certain rate communicated to the +body, is automatically sorted out, and appears on a certain precise spot +of the body in the form of increased activity, increased blood pressure +in the cells, and hence what all physicians know as a "dull area," which +can be discovered by what is known as "percussion," a tapping with a +finger. To map out these areas is merely a matter of long and patient +experiment; and Abrams has been studying this subject for some twenty +years—he is author of<a name="vol_i_page_193" id="vol_i_page_193"></a> a text-book on what is known as the "reactions +of Abrams." So now he provides the world with a series of maps of the +human body; and he sits in front of his "subject," and his assistant +places a specimen of blood in a little electrically connected box, and +sets the rheostat at some vibration number—say fifty—and Dr. Abrams +taps on a certain square inch of the abdomen of his "subject," and +announces the dread word "cancer." Then he places the electrode on +another part of the "subject's" body, and taps some more, and announces +that it is cancer of the small intestine, left side; some more tapping, +and he announces that its intensity is twelve ohms, which is severe; and +pretty soon there is speeding a telegram to the physician who has sent +this blood specimen, telling him these facts, and prescribing a certain +vibration rate upon the "oscilloclast," the instrument of radio-activity +which Dr. Abrams has devised.</p> + +<p>Now, you watch this thing for an hour or two, and you say to yourself: +"Here is either the greatest magician in the history of mankind, or else +the greatest maniac." You may have come prepared for some kind of fraud, +but you soon dismiss that, for you realize that this man is desperately +in earnest about what he is doing, and so are all the physicians who +watch him. So you seek refuge in the thought that he must be deluding +himself and them, perhaps unconsciously. But you talk with these men, +and discover that they have come from all over the country, and always +for one reason—they had sent blood specimens to Abrams, and had found +that he never made a mistake; he told them more from a few drops of the +patient's blood than they themselves had been able to find out from the +whole patient. And then into the clinic come the doctor's own +patients—I must have heard sixty or eighty of them tell their story and +many of them have been lifted from the grave. People ten years blind +from syphilis who can see; people operated on several times for cancer +and given up for dying; people with tumors on the brain, or with one +lung gone from tuberculosis. It is literally a fact that when you have +sat in Abrams' clinic for a week, all disease loses its terrors.</p> + +<p>This, you see, is really the mastery of life. If we can measure and +control the minute universe of the electron and the atom, we have +touched the ultimate source of our bodily life. I might take chapters of +this book to tell you of the strange experiments I have seen in this +clinic—showing you, for instance, how these vibrations respond to +thought, how<a name="vol_i_page_194" id="vol_i_page_194"></a> by denying to himself the disease the patient can for a +few moments cancel in his body the activity of the harmful germs; +showing how the reactions differ in the different sexes and at different +ages, and how they respond to different colors and different drugs. +Abrams' method has revealed the secret of such efficacy as drugs +possess—their work is done by their radio-activity, and not by their +chemical properties. Also the problem of vaccination has been +solved—for Abrams has discovered a dread new disease, which is bovine +syphilis, originally caused in cattle by human inoculation, and now +reintroduced in the human being by vaccination, and becoming the agent +which prepares the soil of the body for such disorders as tuberculosis +and cancer. And it appears that we can all be rendered immune to these +diseases, by a few electronic vibrations, introduced into our bodies in +childhood; so is opened up to our eyes a wonderful vision of a new race, +purified and made fit for life. So here at last is science justified of +her optimism, and our faith in human destiny forever vindicated. Take my +advice, whoever you may be that are suffering, and find out about this +new work and help to make it known to the world.</p> + +<p>There are many romances of medical science, some of them fascinating as +murder mysteries and big game hunting. Turn to McMasters' "History of +the People of the United States" and read his account of the terrible +epidemic of yellow fever in Philadelphia a hundred years ago; I have +already referred to the weird and incredible things the people did in +their effort to ward off this plague—sponges of vinegar under their +noses and "fever fires" burning in the streets; and then a mosquito +would fly up and bite them, and in a few hours they would be dead! Or +what could be stranger than the tracing of the bubonic plague, which has +cost literally billions of human lives, to a parasite in the blood of +fleas which live on the bodies of rats! Or what could be more unexpected +than the tracing of our rheumatic aches and twinges to the root canals +of the teeth!</p> + +<p>One of the common ailments which afflict poor humanity is rheumatism, a +cause of endless suffering. It was supposed to be due to damp climate +and exposure, and this is true to a certain extent, in the same way that +colds are due to exposure. But the investigators realized that there +must be some bodily condition rendering one susceptible, and they set to +work to trace this condition down. The pains of rheumatism are caused by +uric acid settling in the joints<a name="vol_i_page_195" id="vol_i_page_195"></a> of the body. What causes the uric +acid? Well, there is uric acid in red meat, so let us forbid rheumatic +people to eat it! But this is overlooking the fact that the human body +itself is a uric acid factory; and also the fact that uric acid taken +into the stomach may not remain uric acid by the time it gets to the +blood-stream. We know that you may eat a great deal of fruit acid +without necessarily making acid blood. On the other hand, you can make +acid blood by eating a lot of sugar! So you see it isn't as simple as it +sounds.</p> + +<p>Rheumatism has been traced to its lair, which is found to be the roots +of the teeth. Here is a part of the body difficult to get at, and as a +consequence of bad diet and unwholesome ways of living, infections will +start there, and pus sacs be formed, and the poisons absorbed into the +blood-stream and distributed through the body. The first thought is to +draw the infected teeth; but that is a serious matter, because you need +your teeth to chew your food. So the dentist has to go through a +complicated process of opening up the tooth and cleaning out the root +canals, and treating the infected spots at the roots. Then he has to +fill the tooth all the way down to the roots, leaving no place for +infection to gather. This, of course, takes time and costs money, and is +one more illustration of the fact that there is one health law for the +rich and another health law for the poor.</p> + +<p>All the time that I write these chapters about health I feel guilty. I +know that the wholesome food I recommend costs money, and I know that +surgery and dentistry cost money—yes, even sunlight and fresh air and +recreation; even a fast, because you have to rest while you take it, and +you have to have a roof over your head, and warmth in winter time, and +somebody to wait upon you when you are weak. I know that for a great +many of the people who read what I write, all these things are +impossible of attainment; I know that for the great majority of the +common people the benefits of science do not exist. Science discovers +how to prevent disease, but the discoveries are not applied, because the +profit system controls the world, and the profit system wants the labor +of the poor, regardless of what happens to their health. If the people +fall ill, they are thrown upon the scrap heap, and the profit system +finds others to take their place.<a name="vol_i_page_196" id="vol_i_page_196"></a></p> + +<p>Take, for example, tuberculosis. Tuberculosis is a germ infection, but +it practically never gets hold upon a human body except when the body is +reduced by undernourishment and lack of fresh air. Tuberculosis, +therefore, is a disease of slums and jails. It is definitely and +indisputably a disease of poverty. It could be wiped off the face of the +earth in a single generation; and the same is true of typhus and +typhoid. There is another whole host of ailments which could be wiped +out by measures of public hygiene, plus education. This includes all the +infant diseases, and the deadly venereal diseases. But the profit system +stands in the way; and so, in these closing paragraphs of this Book of +the Body, I say that there is one disease which is the deadliest of all, +and the source of all others, and that disease is poverty.</p> + +<p>I know a certain physician to the rich, who is an honest and +conscientious man. He said, "I loath my work. I am wasting my time. I am +called in by these fat, over-fed rich people in their leisure class +hotels, and what am I to say to them? Shall I say to them, 'You are +living an abnormal life, and you can never be well until you cut out +root and branch all your habits of self indulgence which are destroying +you?' But no, I can't say that—not one time in a thousand. I am +expected to be polite and serious, and to listen to them while they tell +the long tiresome story of their symptoms, and I have to encourage them, +and give them some temporary device that will remove some of the +symptoms of their trouble."</p> + +<p>And what should one say to this honest physician? Should one tell him to +go and be a physician to the poor? Would he be any happier there? He +could tell the poor the causes of their diseases, and they would listen +patiently—they are trained to listen, and to accept what they are told. +Here is a girl living in an inside bedroom in a tenement, and working +ten or eleven hours a day in an unventilated factory, and she is ill +with tuberculosis. The physician tells her that she needs plenty of +fresh air and rest, and a lot of eggs and milk in her diet. He tells her +that, and he knows that she has as much chance of carrying out his +orders as of flying to the moon. Or maybe he comes upon a typhoid +epidemic, and discovers, as happened to a friend of mine in Chicago, +that there is defective plumbing in some houses owned by the political +leader of the district. Or maybe it is a case<a name="vol_i_page_197" id="vol_i_page_197"></a> of venereal disease, in a +young man who was drafted into the army and turned loose amid the joys +of Paris. Maybe it is just a commonplace, every-day story of a room full +of school children, 22 per cent of them undernourished, as is the case +in New York City, and the parents out of work a part of the time, and +with no possibility in their lives of ever earning enough to feed the +children properly. When you confront these universal facts of our +present social order, you realize that the problem of disease is not +merely a problem of the body, but is a problem of the mind as well; a +problem of politics and religion and philosophy, of the whole way of +thinking of the so-called civilized world. A book of health which did +not point out these facts would be, not a book of health, but a book of +sham.</p> + +<p>But meantime, while we are trying to change the world's ideas, we have +to live, and we can do our work better if we keep as well as possible. I +have tried to point out the way; it is, as you can see, a matter in part +of the body and in part of the mind. All the bodily régime here laid out +has its basis in mental habits; all wise and wholesome ways of life can, +at the age when our minds are plastic, be made into "second +nature"—things which we do automatically, without effort or temptation +to do otherwise. This is the real secret of true happiness in the +conduct of our personal lives; to acquire self-control, to rule our +desires and our passions, not harshly and spasmodically, but serenely, +as one drives a car which he thoroughly understands. It is in vain that +we preach freedom to men who have not this self-mastery; as the poet +tell us: "The sensual and the dark rebel in vain, slaves of their own +compulsion." And of all the personal possessions which man can attain on +this earth, the most precious is the one of a sound mind controlling a +sound body. I close this book by quoting some verses written by Sir +Henry Wotton three hundred years ago, which I have all my life +considered one of the noblest pieces of poetry in our heritage:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">THE CHARACTER OF A HAPPY LIFE</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"> </td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">How happy is he born and taught</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">That serveth not another's will;</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Whose armour is his honest thought</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">And simple truth his utmost skill!<a name="vol_i_page_198" id="vol_i_page_198"></a></span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"> </td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Whose passions not his masters are,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">Whose soul is still prepared for death,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Not tied unto the world with care</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">Of public fame, or private breath.</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"> </td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Who envies none that chance doth raise</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">Or vice; who never understood</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">How deepest wounds are given by praise;</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">Nor rules of state, but rules of good:</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"> </td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Who hath his life from rumours freed,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">Whose conscience is his strong retreat;</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Whose state can neither flatterers feed,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">Nor ruin make accusers great:</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Who God doth late and early pray</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">More of His grace than gifts to lend;</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">And entertains the harmless day</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">With a well-chosen book or friend;</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"> </td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">—This man is freed from servile bands</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">Of hope to rise, or fear to fall;</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Lord of himself, though not of lands;</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">And having nothing, yet hath all.</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_199" id="vol_i_page_199"></a></p> + +<p><a name="vol_i_page_200" id="vol_i_page_200"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="INDEX_VOL_I" id="INDEX_VOL_I"></a>INDEX</h2> + +<p class="cb"><a href="#vol_i_A">A</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_B">B</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_C">C</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_D">D</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_E">E</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_F">F</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_G">G</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_H">H</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_I">I</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_J">J</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_K">K</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_L">L</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_M">M</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_N">N</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_O">O</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_P">P</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_Q">Q</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_R">R</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_S">S</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_T">T</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_U">U</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_V">V</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_W">W</a>, +<a href="#vol_i_Y">Y</a> +</p> + +<p class="nind"> +<a name="vol_i_A" id="vol_i_A"></a>Abrams, Dr., 1<a href="#vol_i_page_090">90</a><br /> +Adultery, <a href="#vol_i_page_033">33</a><br /> +Adventist, <a href="#vol_i_page_099">99</a><br /> +Agriculture, <a href="#vol_i_page_025">25</a><br /> +Alcohol, <a href="#vol_i_page_151">151</a><br /> +Anti-bodies, <a href="#vol_i_page_188">188</a><br /> +Antinomies, <a href="#vol_i_page_058">58</a><br /> +Appendix, <a href="#vol_i_page_186">186</a><br /> +Arnold, <a href="#vol_i_page_042">42</a><br /> +Arrhenius, <a href="#vol_i_page_101">101</a><br /> +Automatic writing, <a href="#vol_i_page_067">67</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_B" id="vol_i_B"></a>Bairnsfather, <a href="#vol_i_page_029">29</a><br /> +Bathing, <a href="#vol_i_page_162">162</a><br /> +Battle Creek Sanitarium, <a href="#vol_i_page_118">118</a><br /> +Beauchamp, <a href="#vol_i_page_070">70</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_085">85</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_089">89</a><br /> +Beethoven, <a href="#vol_i_page_047">47</a><br /> +Bergson, <a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a><br /> +Beri-beri, <a href="#vol_i_page_128">128</a><br /> +Bible, <a href="#vol_i_page_077">77</a><br /> +Bio-chemist, <a href="#vol_i_page_059">59</a><br /> +Black bread, <a href="#vol_i_page_128">128</a><br /> +Blood, <a href="#vol_i_page_106">106</a><br /> +Body, <a href="#vol_i_page_053">53</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_105">105</a><br /> +Booth, <a href="#vol_i_page_058">58</a><br /> +Bourne, <a href="#vol_i_page_069">69</a><br /> +Bruce, <a href="#vol_i_page_071">71</a><br /> +Bury, <a href="#vol_i_page_015">15</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_C" id="vol_i_C"></a>Caffein, <a href="#vol_i_page_150">150</a><br /> +Calories, <a href="#vol_i_page_135">135</a><br /> +Candy, <a href="#vol_i_page_137">137</a><br /> +Capitalist, <a href="#vol_i_page_100">100</a><br /> +Carbohydrates, <a href="#vol_i_page_124">124</a><br /> +Carbon monoxide, <a href="#vol_i_page_157">157</a><br /> +Children, <a href="#vol_i_page_140">140</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_180">180</a><br /> +Chiropractors, <a href="#vol_i_page_174">174</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_184">184</a><br /> +Chittenden, <a href="#vol_i_page_136">136</a><br /> +Christian Scientists, <a href="#vol_i_page_005">5</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_065">65</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_105">105</a><br /> +Clothing, <a href="#vol_i_page_160">160</a><br /> +Coffee, <a href="#vol_i_page_151">151</a><br /> +Colds, <a href="#vol_i_page_183">183</a><br /> +Commandments, <a href="#vol_i_page_032">32</a><br /> +Communist, <a href="#vol_i_page_099">99</a><br /> +Complete fast, <a href="#vol_i_page_172">172</a><br /> +Comstock, <a href="#vol_i_page_025">25</a><br /> +Conduct, <a href="#vol_i_page_042">42</a><br /> +Consciousness, <a href="#vol_i_page_056">56</a><br /> +Constipation, <a href="#vol_i_page_185">185</a><br /> +Cooking, <a href="#vol_i_page_129">129</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_142">142</a><br /> +Crawford, <a href="#vol_i_page_088">88</a><br /> +Cyrus, <a href="#vol_i_page_164">164</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_D" id="vol_i_D"></a>Dandruff, <a href="#vol_i_page_109">109</a><br /> +Dante, <a href="#vol_i_page_077">77</a><br /> +Darwin, <a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_046">46</a><br /> +Dentistry, <a href="#vol_i_page_126">126</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_190">190</a><br /> +Determinists, <a href="#vol_i_page_057">57</a><br /> +Diet, <a href="#vol_i_page_131">131</a><br /> +Diet Standards, <a href="#vol_i_page_135">135</a><br /> +Digestion, <a href="#vol_i_page_145">145</a><br /> +Diphtheria, <a href="#vol_i_page_188">188</a><br /> +Diseases, <a href="#vol_i_page_107">107</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_117">117</a><br /> +Dogs, <a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a><br /> +Draft, <a href="#vol_i_page_182">182</a><br /> +Drugs, <a href="#vol_i_page_118">118</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_150">150</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_185">185</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_189">189</a><br /> +Dubb, <a href="#vol_i_page_063">63</a><br /> +Duncan, <a href="#vol_i_page_102">102</a><br /> +Dyspepsia, <a href="#vol_i_page_117">117</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_E" id="vol_i_E"></a>Eddy, <a href="#vol_i_page_065">65</a><br /> +Edison, <a href="#vol_i_page_045">45</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_086">86</a><br /> +Einstein, <a href="#vol_i_page_101">101</a><br /> +Elberfeld horses, <a href="#vol_i_page_068">68</a><br /> +Evolution, <a href="#vol_i_page_008">8</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a><br /> +Exercise, <a href="#vol_i_page_163">163</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_F" id="vol_i_F"></a>Faith, <a href="#vol_i_page_009">9</a><br /> +Faith curists, <a href="#vol_i_page_065">65</a><br /> +Fast cure, <a href="#vol_i_page_171">171</a><br /> +Fatness, <a href="#vol_i_page_139">139</a><br /> +Fats, <a href="#vol_i_page_124">124</a><br /> +Fever, <a href="#vol_i_page_108">108</a><br /> +Fireless cooker, <a href="#vol_i_page_142">142</a><br /> +Fireplace, <a href="#vol_i_page_157">157</a><br /> +Fisher, <a href="#vol_i_page_136">136</a><br /> +Fletcher, <a href="#vol_i_page_119">119</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_145">145</a><br /> +Food filter, <a href="#vol_i_page_145">145</a><br /> +Fourth dimension, <a href="#vol_i_page_005">5</a><br /> +Free thinker, <a href="#vol_i_page_015">15</a><br /> +Freud, 71<a name="vol_i_page_201" id="vol_i_page_201"></a><br /> +Fruit fast, <a href="#vol_i_page_175">175</a><br /> +Frugality, <a href="#vol_i_page_038">38</a><br /> +Frying-pan, <a href="#vol_i_page_129">129</a><br /> +Furnace, <a href="#vol_i_page_157">157</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_G" id="vol_i_G"></a>Gargles, <a href="#vol_i_page_184">184</a><br /> +Gastronomic art, <a href="#vol_i_page_148">148</a><br /> +Genius, <a href="#vol_i_page_049">49</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_060">60</a><br /> +George, <a href="#vol_i_page_018">18</a><br /> +Germs, <a href="#vol_i_page_183">183</a><br /> +God, <a href="#vol_i_page_022">22</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_050">50</a><br /> +Goethe, <a href="#vol_i_page_047">47</a><br /> +Golden rule, <a href="#vol_i_page_051">51</a><br /> +Greens, <a href="#vol_i_page_132">132</a><br /> +Gymnastic work, <a href="#vol_i_page_166">166</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_H" id="vol_i_H"></a>Hair, <a href="#vol_i_page_109">109</a><br /> +Hallucinations, <a href="#vol_i_page_075">75</a><br /> +Hamlet, <a href="#vol_i_page_048">48</a><br /> +Happiness, <a href="#vol_i_page_009">9</a><br /> +Harrison, <a href="#vol_i_page_006">6</a><br /> +Hats, <a href="#vol_i_page_110">110</a><br /> +Headache, <a href="#vol_i_page_122">122</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_150">150</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_184">184</a><br /> +Health cranks, <a href="#vol_i_page_182">182</a><br /> +Heart, <a href="#vol_i_page_108">108</a><br /> +Houdin, <a href="#vol_i_page_093">93</a><br /> +Hugo, <a href="#vol_i_page_048">48</a><br /> +Huxley, <a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_062">62</a><br /> +Hyslop, <a href="#vol_i_page_082">82</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_I" id="vol_i_I"></a>Iceberg, <a href="#vol_i_page_061">61</a><br /> +Infanticide, <a href="#vol_i_page_028">28</a><br /> +Instincts, <a href="#vol_i_page_134">134</a><br /> +Intelligence, <a href="#vol_i_page_022">22</a><br /> +Immortality, <a href="#vol_i_page_079">79</a><br /> +Irwin, Will, <a href="#vol_i_page_086">86</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_J" id="vol_i_J"></a>James, <a href="#vol_i_page_030">30</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_059">59</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_060">60</a><br /> +Jesus, <a href="#vol_i_page_047">47</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_048">48</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_050">50</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_051">51</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_076">76</a><br /> +John Barleycorn, <a href="#vol_i_page_152">152</a><br /> +Johnson, <a href="#vol_i_page_058">58</a><br /> +Jonson, <a href="#vol_i_page_044">44</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_K" id="vol_i_K"></a>Kant, Immanuel, <a href="#vol_i_page_004">4</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_047">47</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_051">51</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_058">58</a><br /> +Kellogg, Doctor, <a href="#vol_i_page_118">118</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_164">164</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_186">186</a><br /> +Kilmer, Joyce, <a href="#vol_i_page_044">44</a><br /> +Knowledge, <a href="#vol_i_page_094">94</a><br /> +Kropotkin, <a href="#vol_i_page_018">18</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_026">26</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_L" id="vol_i_L"></a>Langley, <a href="#vol_i_page_074">74</a><br /> +Lankester, Prof. E. Ray, <a href="#vol_i_page_023">23</a><br /> +Laxatives, <a href="#vol_i_page_175">175</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_185">185</a><br /> +Leanness, <a href="#vol_i_page_139">139</a><br /> +Leonardo, <a href="#vol_i_page_047">47</a><br /> +Liébault, <a href="#vol_i_page_064">64</a><br /> +Life, <a href="#vol_i_page_003">3</a><br /> +Lily Dale, <a href="#vol_i_page_086">86</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_090">90</a><br /> +Lincoln, <a href="#vol_i_page_047">47</a><br /> +Locomotor ataxia, <a href="#vol_i_page_180">180</a><br /> +Lodge, Sir Oliver, <a href="#vol_i_page_083">83</a><br /> +Lodge, Raymond, <a href="#vol_i_page_087">87</a><br /> +London, Jack, <a href="#vol_i_page_152">152</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_M" id="vol_i_M"></a>Macaulay, <a href="#vol_i_page_039">39</a><br /> +MacDowell, Edward, <a href="#vol_i_page_056">56</a><br /> +MacFadden, <a href="#vol_i_page_178">178</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_186">186</a><br /> +MacSwiney, <a href="#vol_i_page_170">170</a><br /> +Maeterlinck, Maurice, <a href="#vol_i_page_068">68</a><br /> +Malaria, <a href="#vol_i_page_189">189</a><br /> +Malthusian law, <a href="#vol_i_page_025">25</a><br /> +Marquesans, <a href="#vol_i_page_113">113</a><br /> +Materializations, <a href="#vol_i_page_088">88</a><br /> +Matter, <a href="#vol_i_page_003">3</a><br /> +Meal-hour, <a href="#vol_i_page_147">147</a><br /> +Measurement of Intelligence, Terman's, <a href="#vol_i_page_095">95</a><br /> +Meat, <a href="#vol_i_page_121">121</a><br /> +Medical science, <a href="#vol_i_page_105">105</a><br /> +Mesmer, <a href="#vol_i_page_063">63</a><br /> +Messina earthquake, <a href="#vol_i_page_170">170</a><br /> +Metaphysics, <a href="#vol_i_page_004">4</a><br /> +Metchnikoff, <a href="#vol_i_page_138">138</a><br /> +Milk diet, <a href="#vol_i_page_128">128</a><br /> +Moderation, <a href="#vol_i_page_039">39</a><br /> +Monism, <a href="#vol_i_page_003">3</a><br /> +Morality, <a href="#vol_i_page_021">21</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_031">31</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_034">34</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_050">50</a><br /> +Morgan, <a href="#vol_i_page_045">45</a><br /> +Mormon, <a href="#vol_i_page_099">99</a><br /> +Mozart, <a href="#vol_i_page_068">68</a><br /> +Multiple personality, <a href="#vol_i_page_069">69</a><br /> +Mutation, <a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a><br /> +Myers, <a href="#vol_i_page_049">49</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_N" id="vol_i_N"></a>Nature, <a href="#vol_i_page_021">21</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_024">24</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_029">29</a><br /> +Nature cure, <a href="#vol_i_page_160">160</a><br /> +Nature Woman, <a href="#vol_i_page_176">176</a><br /> +Neighbor, <a href="#vol_i_page_050">50</a><br /> +Newcomb, Simon, <a href="#vol_i_page_101">101</a><br /> +Newton, 47<a name="vol_i_page_202" id="vol_i_page_202"></a><br /> +New York Times, <a href="#vol_i_page_169">169</a><br /> +Nicotine, <a href="#vol_i_page_154">154</a><br /> +Nietzsche, <a href="#vol_i_page_017">17</a><br /> +Novels, <a href="#vol_i_page_164">164</a><br /> +Nutrition of Man, <a href="#vol_i_page_136">136</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_O" id="vol_i_O"></a>Oil stoves, <a href="#vol_i_page_158">158</a><br /> +Opsonins, <a href="#vol_i_page_112">112</a><br /> +Optimism, <a href="#vol_i_page_042">42</a><br /> +Osteopaths, <a href="#vol_i_page_184">184</a><br /> +Ouija, <a href="#vol_i_page_067">67</a><br /> +Overeating, <a href="#vol_i_page_134">134</a><br /> +Oxygen, <a href="#vol_i_page_156">156</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_P" id="vol_i_P"></a>Patrick, Dr., <a href="#vol_i_page_167">167</a><br /> +Pavlov, <a href="#vol_i_page_148">148</a><br /> +Phantasms, <a href="#vol_i_page_075">75</a><br /> +Phillips, David Graham, <a href="#vol_i_page_180">180</a><br /> +Piper, Mrs., <a href="#vol_i_page_068">68</a><br /> +Play, <a href="#vol_i_page_165">165</a><br /> +Poisons, <a href="#vol_i_page_146">146</a><br /> +Pork, <a href="#vol_i_page_142">142</a><br /> +Porter, Dr., <a href="#vol_i_page_178">178</a><br /> +Positivists, <a href="#vol_i_page_006">6</a><br /> +Poverty, <a href="#vol_i_page_194">194</a><br /> +Prices of food, <a href="#vol_i_page_141">141</a><br /> +Prince, Dr. Morton, <a href="#vol_i_page_070">70</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_089">89</a><br /> +Profits of Religion, <a href="#vol_i_page_078">78</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_099">99</a><br /> +Proteins, <a href="#vol_i_page_123">123</a><br /> +Prunes, <a href="#vol_i_page_127">127</a><br /> +Psychology, <a href="#vol_i_page_096">96</a><br /> +Psychotherapy, <a href="#vol_i_page_064">64</a><br /> +Puritans, <a href="#vol_i_page_039">39</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_Q" id="vol_i_Q"></a>Quackenbos, <a href="#vol_i_page_064">64</a><br /> +Quinine, <a href="#vol_i_page_188">188</a><br /> +Quixote, <a href="#vol_i_page_048">48</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_R" id="vol_i_R"></a>Raisins, <a href="#vol_i_page_127">127</a><br /> +Raw food, <a href="#vol_i_page_119">119</a><br /> +Read, Alfred Baker, <a href="#vol_i_page_028">28</a><br /> +Reason, <a href="#vol_i_page_013">13</a><br /> +Refined foods, <a href="#vol_i_page_126">126</a><br /> +Relaxation, <a href="#vol_i_page_167">167</a><br /> +Religion, <a href="#vol_i_page_032">32</a><br /> +Reincarnation, <a href="#vol_i_page_076">76</a><br /> +Rest, <a href="#vol_i_page_146">146</a><br /> +Revelation, <a href="#vol_i_page_012">12</a><br /> +Rheumatism, <a href="#vol_i_page_193">193</a><br /> +Rice, <a href="#vol_i_page_128">128</a><br /> +Rockefeller, <a href="#vol_i_page_045">45</a><br /> +Roosevelt, Theodore, <a href="#vol_i_page_025">25</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_045">45</a><br /> +Rugs, <a href="#vol_i_page_159">159</a><br /> +Rupture, <a href="#vol_i_page_187">187</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_S" id="vol_i_S"></a>Sabbath, <a href="#vol_i_page_099">99</a><br /> +Salisbury, <a href="#vol_i_page_120">120</a><br /> +Sally, <a href="#vol_i_page_070">70</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_085">85</a><br /> +Salt, <a href="#vol_i_page_143">143</a><br /> +Meats, salted, <a href="#vol_i_page_143">143</a><br /> +Salts, <a href="#vol_i_page_124">124</a><br /> +Salvarsan, <a href="#vol_i_page_189">189</a><br /> +Savages, <a href="#vol_i_page_135">135</a><br /> +Savage, Rev. Minot J., <a href="#vol_i_page_074">74</a><br /> +Schrenck-Notzing, <a href="#vol_i_page_088">88</a><br /> +Scurvy, <a href="#vol_i_page_128">128</a><br /> +Seneca, <a href="#vol_i_page_098">98</a><br /> +Shakespeare, <a href="#vol_i_page_047">47</a><br /> +Shelley, <a href="#vol_i_page_045">45</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_048">48</a><br /> +Sleep, <a href="#vol_i_page_162">162</a><br /> +Sleeping sickness, <a href="#vol_i_page_113">113</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_173">173</a><br /> +Smokers, <a href="#vol_i_page_153">153</a><br /> +Socialism, <a href="#vol_i_page_167">167</a><br /> +Sophocles, <a href="#vol_i_page_087">87</a><br /> +Sore throat, <a href="#vol_i_page_183">183</a><br /> +Spencer, <a href="#vol_i_page_008">8</a><br /> +Spinoza, <a href="#vol_i_page_079">79</a><br /> +Spirits, <a href="#vol_i_page_082">82</a><br /> +Spiritualists, <a href="#vol_i_page_086">86</a><br /> +Starch, <a href="#vol_i_page_122">122</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_124">124</a><br /> +Stealing, <a href="#vol_i_page_033">33</a><br /> +Steam heat, <a href="#vol_i_page_158">158</a><br /> +Stimulant, <a href="#vol_i_page_149">149</a><br /> +Stock Exchange, <a href="#vol_i_page_158">158</a><br /> +Stomach, <a href="#vol_i_page_105">105</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_138">138</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_148">148</a><br /> +Style, <a href="#vol_i_page_161">161</a><br /> +Subconscious mind, <a href="#vol_i_page_061">61</a><br /> +Sunday code, <a href="#vol_i_page_040">40</a><br /> +Sugar, <a href="#vol_i_page_126">126</a><br /> +Surgery, <a href="#vol_i_page_186">186</a><br /> +Survival, <a href="#vol_i_page_081">81</a><br /> +Survival of the fittest, <a href="#vol_i_page_022">22</a><br /> +Syndicalism, <a href="#vol_i_page_015">15</a><br /> +Syphilis, <a href="#vol_i_page_189">189</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_T" id="vol_i_T"></a>Tanner, Dr., <a href="#vol_i_page_169">169</a><br /> +Tariff, <a href="#vol_i_page_037">37</a><br /> +Tea, <a href="#vol_i_page_151">151</a><br /> +Teeth, <a href="#vol_i_page_127">127</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_193">193</a><br /> +Telepathy, <a href="#vol_i_page_067">67</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_075">75</a><br /> +Theosophists, 76<a name="vol_i_page_203" id="vol_i_page_203"></a><br /> +Tight shoes, <a href="#vol_i_page_161">161</a><br /> +Tobacco, <a href="#vol_i_page_153">153</a><br /> +Tolstoi, <a href="#vol_i_page_049">49</a><br /> +Tonsilitis, <a href="#vol_i_page_107">107</a><br /> +Trance, <a href="#vol_i_page_063">63</a><br /> +Tropism, <a href="#vol_i_page_054">54</a><br /> +Tuberculosis, <a href="#vol_i_page_112">112</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_120">120</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_179">179</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_194">194</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_195">195</a><br /> +Twain, Mark, <a href="#vol_i_page_093">93</a><br /> +Typhoid, <a href="#vol_i_page_112">112</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_188">188</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_192">192</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_U" id="vol_i_U"></a>Uranus, <a href="#vol_i_page_092">92</a><br /> +Uric acid, <a href="#vol_i_page_193">193</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_V" id="vol_i_V"></a>Vaccination, <a href="#vol_i_page_187">187</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_189">189</a><br /> +Vaccines, <a href="#vol_i_page_188">188</a><br /> +Vegetarian, <a href="#vol_i_page_121">121</a><br /> +Vitamines, <a href="#vol_i_page_127">127</a>, <a href="#vol_i_page_142">142</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_W" id="vol_i_W"></a>Wallace, <a href="#vol_i_page_046">46</a><br /> +Wells, H. G., <a href="#vol_i_page_022">22</a><br /> +Williams, Dr. Henry Smith, <a href="#vol_i_page_102">102</a><br /> +Worth, Patience, <a href="#vol_i_page_084">84</a><br /> +<br /> +<a name="vol_i_Y" id="vol_i_Y"></a>Yellow fever, <a href="#vol_i_page_188">188</a><br /> +Yogis, <a href="#vol_i_page_090">90</a><br /> +</p> + +<p><a name="VOLUME_II" id="VOLUME_II"></a></p> + +<h1>THE BOOK OF LIFE</h1> + +<h2>VOLUME TWO: LOVE AND SOCIETY</h2> + +<p class="cb"> +<i>To</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="eng">Kate Crane Gartz</span><br /> +<br /> +in acknowledgment of her unceasing efforts for a<br /> +better world, and her fidelity to those<br /> +who struggle to achieve it.<br /> +</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" summary="CONTENTS"> + +<tr><th colspan="2" align="center"><a name="CONTENTS_VOL_II" id="CONTENTS_VOL_II"></a><big>CONTENTS</big></th></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2" > </td></tr> + +<tr><td align="center" colspan="2"><a href="#PART_THREE">PART THREE: THE BOOK OF LOVE</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td align="right" colspan="2"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXVIII">Chapter XXVIII.</a></span> <span class="smcap">The Reality of Marriage</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_003">3</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the sex-customs now existing in the world,<br /> +and their relation to the ideal of monogamous love.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXIX">Chapter XXIX.</a></span> <span class="smcap">The Development of Marriage</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_008">8</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Deals with the sex-relationship, its meaning and its history,<br /> +the stages of its development in human society.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXX">Chapter XXX.</a></span> <span class="smcap">Sex and Young America</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_015">15</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses present-day sex arrangements, as they affect<br /> +the future generation.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXI">Chapter XXXI.</a></span> <span class="smcap">Sex and the "smart Set"</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_023">23</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Portrays the moral customs of those who set the fashion<br /> +in our present-day world.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXII">Chapter XXXII.</a></span> <span class="smcap">Sex and the Poor</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_029">29</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses prostitution, the extent of its prevalence, and<br /> +the diseases which result from it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXIII">Chapter XXXIII.</a></span> <span class="smcap">Sex and Nature</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_033">33</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Maintains that our sex disorders are not the result of<br /> +natural or physical disharmony.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXIV">Chapter XXXIV.</a></span> <span class="smcap">Love and Economics</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_036">36</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Maintains that our sex disorders are of social origin, due<br /> +to the displacing of love by money as a motive in mating.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXV">Chapter XXXV.</a></span> <span class="smcap">Marriage and Money</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_040">40</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the causes of prostitution, and that higher<br /> +form of prostitution known as the "marriage of convenience."</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXVI">Chapter XXXVI.</a></span> <span class="smcap">Love Versus Lust</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_046">46</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the sex impulse, its use and misuse; when it<br /> +should be followed and when repressed.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXVII">Chapter XXXVII.</a> Celibacy Versus Chastity</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_051">51</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> The ideal of the repression of the sex-impulse, as against<br /> +the ideal of its guidance and cultivation.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXVIII">Chapter XXXVIII.</a> The Defense of Love</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_055">55</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses passionate love, its sanction, its place in life,<br /> +and its preservation in marriage.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXXIX">Chapter XXXIX.</a> Birth Control</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_060">60</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Deals with the prevention of conception as one of the<br /> +greatest of man's discoveries, releasing him from nature's<br /> +enslavement, and placing the keys of life in his hands.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XL">Chapter XL.</a> Early Marriage</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_066">66</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses love marriages, how they can be made, and the<br /> +duty of parents in respect to them.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLI">Chapter XLI.</a> The Marriage Club</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_071">71</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses how parents and elders may help the young to<br /> +avoid unhappy marriages.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLII">Chapter XLII.</a> Education for Marriage</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_075">75</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Maintains that the art of love can be taught, and that<br /> +we have the right and the duty to teach it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLIII">Chapter XLIII.</a> The Money Side of Marriage</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_079">79</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Deals with the practical side of the life partnership of<br /> +matrimony.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLIV">Chapter XLIV.</a> The Defense of Monogamy</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_083">83</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the permanence of love, and why we should<br /> +endeavor to preserve it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLV">Chapter XLV.</a> The Problem of Jealousy</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_089">89</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the question, to what extent one person may<br /> +hold another to the pledge of love.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLVI">Chapter XLVI.</a> The Problem of Divorce</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_093">93</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Defends divorce as a protection to monogamous love, and<br /> +one of the means of preventing infidelity and prostitution.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLVII">Chapter XLVII.</a> The Restriction of Divorce</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_097">97</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the circumstances under which society has the<br /> +right to forbid divorce, or to impose limitations upon it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2" > </td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><a href="#PART_FOUR">PART FOUR: THE BOOK OF SOCIETY</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2" > </td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLVIII">Chapter XLVIII.</a> The Ego and the World</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_103">103</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the beginning of consciousness, in the infant<br /> +and in primitive man, and the problem of its adjustment<br /> +to life.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_XLVIX">Chapter XLVIX.</a> Competition and Co-operation</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_107">107</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the relation of the adult to society, and<br /> +the part which selfishness and unselfishness play in the<br /> +development of social life.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_L">Chapter L.</a> Aristocracy and Democracy</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_115">115</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the idea of superior classes and races, and<br /> +whether there is a natural basis for such a doctrine.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LI">Chapter LI.</a> Ruling Classes</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_119">119</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Deals with authority in human society, how it is obtained,<br /> +and what sanction it can claim.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LII">Chapter LII.</a> The Process of Social Evolution</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_122">122</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the series of changes through which human<br /> +society has passed.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LIII">Chapter LIII.</a> Industrial Evolution</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_126">126</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Examines the process of evolution in industry and the<br /> +stage which it has so far reached.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LIV">Chapter LIV.</a> The Class Struggle</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_132">132</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses history as a battle-ground between ruling and<br /> +subject classes, and the method and outcome of this<br /> +struggle.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LV">Chapter LV.</a> The Capitalist System</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_136">136</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Shows how wealth is produced in modern society, and<br /> +the effect of this system upon the minds of the workers.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LVI">Chapter LVI.</a> The Capitalist Process</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_142">142</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> How profits are made under the present industrial<br /> +system and what becomes of them.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LVII">Chapter LVII.</a> Hard Times</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_145">145</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="2"> Explains why capitalist prosperity is a spasmodic thing,<br /> +and why abundant production brings distress instead of<br /> +plenty.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LVIII">Chapter LVIII.</a> The Iron Ring</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_148">148</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Analyzes further the profit system, which strangles production,<br /> +and makes true prosperity impossible.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LIX">Chapter LIX.</a> Foreign Markets</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_151">151</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Considers the efforts of capitalism to save itself by marketing<br /> +its surplus products abroad, and what results from<br /> +these efforts.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LX">Chapter LX.</a> Capitalist War</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_155">155</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Shows how the competition for foreign markets leads<br /> +nations automatically into war.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXI">Chapter LXI.</a> The Possibilities of Production</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_158">158</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Shows how much wealth we could produce if we tried<br /> +and how we proved it when we had to.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXII">Chapter LXII.</a> The Cost of Competition</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_162">162</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the losses of friction in our productive machine,<br /> +those which are obvious and those which are<br /> +hidden.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXIII">Chapter LXIII.</a> Socialism and Syndicalism</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_166">166</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the idea of the management of industry by the<br /> +state, and the idea of its management by the trade unions.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXIV">Chapter LXIV.</a> Communism and Anarchism</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_170">170</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Considers the idea of goods owned in common, and the<br /> +idea of a society without compulsion, and how these<br /> +ideas have fared in Russia.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXV">Chapter LXV.</a> Social Revolution</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_175">175</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> How the great change is coming in different industries,<br /> +and how we may prepare to meet it.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXVI">Chapter LXVI.</a> Confiscation Or Compensation</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_179">179</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Shall the workers buy out the capitalists? Can they<br /> +afford to do it, and what will be the price?</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXVII">Chapter LXVII.</a> Expropriating the Expropriators</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_183">183</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the dictatorship of the proletariat, and its<br /> +chances for success in the United States.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXVIII">Chapter LXVIII.</a> The Problem of the Land</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_188">188</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the land values tax as a means of social readjustment,<br /> +and compares it with other programs.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXIX">Chapter LXIX.</a> The Control of Credit</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_192">192</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Deals with money, the part it plays in the restriction of<br /> +industry, and may play in the freeing of industry.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXX">Chapter LXX.</a> The Control of Industry</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_198">198</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses various programs for the change from industrial<br /> +autocracy to industrial democracy.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXXI">Chapter LXXI.</a> The New World</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_202">202</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Describes the co-operative commonwealth, beginning<br /> +with its money aspects; the standard wage and its variations.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXXII">Chapter LXXII.</a> Agricultural Production</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_206">206</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses the land in the new world, and how we foster<br /> +co-operative farming and co-operative homes.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXXIII">Chapter LXXIII.</a> Intellectual Production</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_210">210</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses scientific, artistic, and religious activities, as<br /> +a superstructure built upon the foundation of the standard<br /> +wage.</td></tr> + +<tr><td><span class="smcap"><a href="#CHAPTER_LXXIV">Chapter LXXIV.</a> Mankind Remade</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#vol_ii_page_215">215</a></td></tr> +<tr><td colspan="2"> Discusses human nature and its weaknesses, and what<br /> +happens to these in the new world.</td></tr> +</table> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_001" id="vol_ii_page_001"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="PART_THREE" id="PART_THREE"></a>PART THREE<br /><br /> +THE BOOK OF LOVE</h2> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_002" id="vol_ii_page_002"></a></p> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_003" id="vol_ii_page_003"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXVIII" id="CHAPTER_XXVIII"></a>CHAPTER XXVIII<br /><br /> +THE REALITY OF MARRIAGE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the sex-customs now existing in the world, and their +relation to the ideal of monogamous love.)</p></div> + +<p>Just as human beings through wrong religious beliefs torture one +another, and wreck their lives and happiness; just as through wrong +eating and other physical habits they make disease and misery for +themselves; just so they suffer and perish for lack of the most +elementary knowledge concerning the sex relationship. The difference is +that in the field of religious ideas it is now permissible to impart the +truth one possesses. If I tell you there is no devil, and that believing +this will not cause you to suffer in an eternity of sulphur and +brimstone, no one will be able to burn me at the stake, even though he +might like to do so. If I advise you that it is not harmful to eat +beefsteak on Friday, or to eat thoroughly cooked pork any day of the +week, neither the archbishops nor the rabbis nor the vegetarians will be +able to lock me in a dungeon. But if I should impart to you the simplest +and most necessary bit of knowledge concerning the facts of your sex +life—things which every man and woman must know if we are to stop +breeding imbecility and degeneracy in the world—then I should be +liable, under federal statutes, to pay a fine of $5,000, and to serve a +term of five years in a federal penitentiary. Scarcely a week passes +that I do not receive a letter from someone asking for information about +such matters; but I dare not answer the letters, because I know there +are agencies, maintained and paid by religious superstition, employing +spies to trap people into the breaking of this law.</p> + +<p>I shall tell you here as much as I am permitted to tell, in the simplest +language and the most honest spirit. I believe that human beings are +meant to be happy on this earth, and to avoid misery and disease. I +believe that they are given the powers of intelligence in order to seek +the ways of happiness, and I believe that it is a worthy work to give +them the knowledge they need in order to find happiness.<a name="vol_ii_page_004" id="vol_ii_page_004"></a></p> + +<p>At the outset of this Book of Love we are going to examine the existing +facts of the sex relationships of men and women in present-day society. +We shall discover that amid all the false and dishonest thinking of +mankind, there is nowhere more falsity and dishonesty than here. The +whole world is a gigantic conspiracy of "hush," and the orthodox and +respectable of the world are like worshippers of some god, who spend +their day-time burning incense before the altar, and in the night-time +steal the sacred jewels and devour the consecrated offerings. These +worshippers confront you with the question, do you believe in marriage; +and they make the assumption that the institution of marriage exists, or +at some time has existed in the world. But if you wish to do any sound +thinking about this subject, you must get one thing clear at the outset; +the institution of marriage is an ideal which has been preached and +taught, but which has never anywhere, in any society, at any stage of +human progress, actually existed as the general practice of mankind. +What has existed and still exists is a very different institution, which +I shall here describe as marriage-plus-prostitution.</p> + +<p>By this statement I do not mean to deny that there are many women, and a +few men, who have been monogamous all their lives; nor that there are +many couples living together happily in monogamous marriage. What I mean +is that, considering society as a whole, wherever you find the +institution of marriage, you also find, co-existent therewith and +complementary thereto, the institution of prostitution. Of this double +arrangement one part is recognized, and written into the law; the other +part is hidden, and prohibited by law; but those who have to do with +enforcing the law all know that it exists, and practically all of them +consider it inevitable, and a great many derive income from it. So I +say: if you believe in marriage-plus-prostitution, that is your right; +but if marriage is what you believe in, then your task is to consider +such questions as these: Is marriage a possible thing? Can it ever +become the sex arrangement of any society? What are the forces which +have so far prevented it from prevailing, and how can these forces be +counteracted?</p> + +<p>It is my belief that monogamous love is the most desirable of human sex +relationships, the most fruitful in happiness and spiritual development. +The laws and institutions of civilized society pretend to defend this +relationship, but the briefest<a name="vol_ii_page_005" id="vol_ii_page_005"></a> study of the facts will convince anyone +that these laws and institutions are not really meant to protect +monogamous love. What they are is a device of the property-holding male +to secure his property rights to women, and more especially to secure +himself as to the paternity of his heirs. In primitive society, where +land and other sources of wealth were held in common, and sex monogamy +was unknown, there was no way to determine paternity, and no reason for +doing so. But under the system of private property and class privilege, +it is necessary for some one man to support a child, if it is to be +supported; and when a man has fought hard, and robbed hard, and traded +hard, and acquired wealth, he does not want to spend it in maintaining +another man's child. That he should let himself be fooled into doing so +is one of the greatest humiliations his fellowmen can imagine. If you +read Shakespeare's plays, and look up the meaning of old words, so as to +understand old witticisms and allusions, you will discover that this was +the stock jest of Shakespeare's time.</p> + +<p>In order to protect himself from such ridicule, the man maintained in +ancient times his right to kill the faithless woman with cruel tortures. +He maintains today the right to deprive her of her children, and of all +share in his property, even though she may have helped to earn it. But +until quite recent times, the beginning of the revolt of women, there +was never any corresponding penalty for faithlessness in husbands. Under +the English law today, the husband may divorce his wife for infidelity, +but the wife must prove infidelity plus cruelty, and the courts have +held that the cruelty must consist in knocking her down. While I was in +England, the highest court rendered a decision that a man who brought +his mistress to his home and compelled his wife to wait upon her was not +committing "cruelty" in the meaning of the English law.</p> + +<p>This is what is known as the "double standard," and the double standard +prevails everywhere under the system of marriage-plus-prostitution, and +proves that capitalist "monogamy" is not a spiritual ideal, but a matter +of class privilege. It is a breach of honor for the ruling class male to +tamper with the wife of his friend; it is frequently dangerous for him +to tamper with the young females of his own class; but it is in general +practice taken for granted that the young females of lower classes are +his legitimate prey. In England a man may have a marriage annulled, if +he can prove that<a name="vol_ii_page_006" id="vol_ii_page_006"></a> the woman he married had what is called a "past"; but +everybody takes it for granted that the man has had a "past"; it is +covered by the polite phrase, "sowing his wild oats." Wherever among the +ruling class you find men bold enough to discuss the facts of the sex +order they have set up, you find the idea, expressed or implied, that +this "wild oats" is a necessary and inevitable part of this order, and +that without it the order would break down. The English philosopher, +Lecky, making an elaborate study of morals through the ages, speaks of +the prostitute in the following frank language:</p> + +<p>"Herself the supreme type of vice, she is ultimately the most efficient +guardian of virtue. But for her, the unchallenged purity of countless +happy homes would be polluted, and not a few who, in the pride of their +untempted chastity, think of her with an indignant shudder, would have +known the agony of remorse and despair. On that one degraded and ignoble +form are concentrated the passions that might have filled the world with +shame. She remains, while creeds and civilizations rise and fall, the +eternal priestess of humanity, blasted for the sins of the people."</p> + +<p>I invite you to study these sentences and understand them fully. +Remember that they are the opinion of the most learned historian of sex +customs who has ever written in English; a man whose authority is +recognized in our schools, whose books are in every college library. +William Edward Hartpole Lecky is not in any sense a revolutionist; he is +a conventional English scholar, an upholder of English law and order and +patriotism. He is not of my school of thought, but of those who now own +the world and run it. I quote him, because he tells in plain language +what kind of world they have made; I invite you to study his words, and +then judge my statement that the sex arrangement under which we live in +modern society is not monogamous love, but marriage-plus-prostitution.</p> + +<p>It is my hope to point the way to a higher system. I should like to call +it marriage; but perhaps it would be more precise to call it +marriage-minus-prostitution. In working it out, we shall have to think +for ourselves, and discard all formulas. It is obvious that our +present-day religious creeds, ethical ideals, legal codes, and social +rewards and punishments have been powerless to protect marriage, or to +make it the rule in sex relationships. So we shall have to begin at the<a name="vol_ii_page_007" id="vol_ii_page_007"></a> +beginning and find new reasons for monogamous love, a new basis of +marriage other than the protection of private property. We shall have to +inform ourselves as to the fundamental purposes of sex; we shall have to +ask ourselves: What are the factors which determine rightness and +wrongness in the sex relationship? What is love, and what ought it to +be? These questions we shall try to approach without any fixed ideas +whatever. We shall decide them by the same tests that we have used in +our thinking about God and immortality, health and disease. We shall +ask, not what our ancestors believed, not what God teaches us, not what +the law ordains, not what is "respectable," nor yet what is "advanced," +according to the claim of modern sex revolutionists and "free lovers." +We shall ask ourselves, what are the facts. We shall ask, what can be +made to work in practice, what can justify itself by the tests of reason +and common sense.<a name="vol_ii_page_008" id="vol_ii_page_008"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXIX" id="CHAPTER_XXIX"></a>CHAPTER XXIX<br /><br /> +THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARRIAGE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Deals with the sex-relationship, its meaning and its history, the +stages of its development in human society.)</p></div> + +<p>What, in the most elemental form, is sex? It is a difference of function +which makes it necessary for two organisms to take part in the +reproduction of the species. The purpose, or at any rate the effect, of +this sex difference is the mixing of characteristics and qualities. If +the sex relationship were unnecessary to reproduction, variations might +begin, and be propagated and carried to extremes in one line of +inheritance, without ever affecting the rest of the species. Very soon +there would be no species, or rather an infinity of them; each line of +descent would fly apart, and become a group all by itself. You have +perhaps heard people comment on the fact that blondes so frequently +prefer brunettes, and that tall men are apt to marry short women, and +vice versa. This is perhaps nature's way of keeping the type uniform, of +spreading qualities widely and testing them thoroughly. Nature is +continually trying out the powers of every individual in every species, +and by the process of sexual selection she chooses, for the reproduction +of the species, the individuals which are best fitted for survival. +This, of course, refers to nature, considered apart from man. In human +society, as I shall presently show, sexual selection has been distorted, +and partly suppressed.</p> + +<p>Sex differentiation and sexual selection exist almost universally +throughout the animal and vegetable kingdoms, everywhere save in the +lowest forms of being. They take strange and startling forms, and like +everything else in nature manifest amazing ingenuity. People who wish to +prove this or that about human sex relations will advance arguments from +nature; but as a matter of fact we can learn nothing whatever from +nature, except her determination to preserve the products of her +activity and to keep them up to standard. Sometimes nature will give the +precedence in power, speed and beauty to the male, and sometimes to the +female. She<a name="vol_ii_page_009" id="vol_ii_page_009"></a> is perfectly ruthless, and willing in the accomplishment of +her purpose to destroy the individuals of either sex. She will content +the most rabid feminist by causing the female spider to devour her mate +when his purpose has been accomplished; or by causing the male bee to +fall from his mating in the air, a disemboweled shell.</p> + +<p>As for man, he has won his supremacy over nature by his greater power to +combine in groups; by his more intense gregarious, or herd instincts, +which enabled him to fight and destroy creatures which would have +exterminated him if he had fought them alone. So in primitive society +everywhere, we find that the individual is subordinated to the group, +and the "folkways" give but little heed to personal rights. Very +thorough investigations have been made into the life of primitive man in +many parts of the world, and the anthropologists are now arguing over +the exact meaning of the data. We shall not here attempt to decide among +them, but rest content with the statement that communism and tribal +ownership is a widespread social form among primitive man, so much so as +to suggest that it is an early stage in social evolution.</p> + +<p>And this communism includes, not merely property, but sex. In the very +earliest days there was often no barrier whatever to the sex +relationship; not even between brothers and sisters, nor between parents +and children. In fact, we find savages who do not know that the sex +relationship has anything to do with procreation. But as knowledge +increases, sex "tabus" develop, some wise, and some foolish. From causes +not entirely clear, but which we discuss in Chapter XLVIII, there +gradually evolves a widespread form of sex relationship of primitive +man, the system of the "gens," as it is called. This is the Latin word +for family, but it does not mean family in the narrow sense of mother +and father and children, but in the broad sense of all those who have +blood relationship, however far removed—uncles and aunts and cousins, +as far as memory can trace. In primitive communism a man is not +permitted to enter into the sex relationship with a woman of the same +gens, but with all the women of some other gens. It is difficult for us +to imagine a society in which all the men named Jones would be married +to all the women named Smith; but that was the way whole races of +mankind lived for many thousands of years.<a name="vol_ii_page_010" id="vol_ii_page_010"></a></p> + +<p>In that primitive communist society, the woman was generally the equal +of the man. It is true that she did the drudgery of the camp, but the +man, on the other hand, faced the hardships of battle and the chase on +land and sea. The woman was as big as the man, and except when +handicapped by pregnancy, as strong as the man; she was as much +respected, if not more so. Her children bore her name, and were under +her control, and she was accustomed to assert herself in all affairs of +the tribe. In Frederick O'Brien's "White Shadows in the South Seas," you +may read a comical story of a journey this traveler made into the +interior of one of the cannibal islands. Everywhere he was treated with +courtesy and hospitality, but was embarrassed by continual offers from +would-be wives. In one case a powerful cannibal lady, whose advances he +rejected, picked him up and proceeded to carry him off, and he was quite +helpless in her grasp; he might have been a cannibal husband today, if +it had not been for the intervention of his fellow travelers.</p> + +<p>The basis of this sex equality under primitive communism is easy to +understand. All goods belonged to the tribe, and were shared alike +according to need. Children were the tribe's most precious possession; +therefore the woman suffered little handicap from having a child to bear +and feed. Primitive woman would bear her child by the roadside, and pick +it up in her arms, and continue her journey; and when she needed food, +she did not have to beg for it—if there was food for anyone, there was +food for her and her child. She did her share of the gathering and +preparing of food, because that was the habit and law of her being; she +had energies, and had never heard of the idea of not using them.</p> + +<p>This primitive communism generally disappears as the tribe progresses. +We cannot be sure of all the stages of its disappearance, or of the +causes, but in a general way we can say that it gives way before the +spread of slavery. In the beginning primitive man does not have any +slaves, he does not have sufficient foresight or self-restraint for +that. When he kills his enemies in battle, he builds a fire and roasts +their flesh and eats them; and those whom he captures alive, he binds +fast and takes with him, to be sacrificed to his voodoo gods. But as he +comes to more settled ways of living, and as the tribe grows larger, it +occurs to the chiefs in battle that the captives would be glad to give +their labor in return<a name="vol_ii_page_011" id="vol_ii_page_011"></a> for their lives, and that it would be convenient +to have some people to do the hard and dirty work. So gradually there +comes to be a class at the bottom of society, and another class at the +top. Those who capture the slaves and keep them at work lay claim to the +products of their labor—at first better weapons and personal +adornments, then separate homes for the chiefs and priests, separate +gardens, separate flocks and herds, and—what more natural?—separate +women.</p> + +<p>This process becomes complete when the tribe settles down to +agriculture, and the ruling classes take possession of the land. When +once the land is privately owned, classes are fixed, and class +distinctions become the most prominent fact in society. And step by step +as this happens, we see women beaten down, from the position of the +cannibal lady, who could ask for the man she wanted and carry him off by +force if necessary, to the position of the modern woman, who is +physically weak, emotionally unstable, economically dependent, and +socially repressed. You may resent such phrases, but all you have to do +is to read the laws of civilized countries, written into the statute +books by men to define the rights and duties of women; you will see that +everywhere, before the recent feminist revolt, women were classified +under the law with children and imbeciles.</p> + +<p>Maternity imposes on woman a heavy burden, and before the discovery of +birth control, a burden that is continuous. For nine months she carries +the child in her body, and then for a year or two she carries it in her +arms, or on her back; and by that time there is another child, and this +continues until she is broken down. Having this burden, she cannot +possibly compete with the unburdened male for the possession of +property. So wherever there is economic competition; wherever certain +individuals or classes in the tribe or group are allowed to seize and +hold the land; wherever the products of labor cease to be the community +property, and become private property, the objects of economic strife; +then inevitably and by natural process, woman comes to be placed among +those who cannot protect themselves—that is, among the children and the +imbeciles and the slaves. Of course, some children are well cared for, +and so are some imbeciles, and some slaves, and some women. But they are +cared for as a matter of favor, not as a matter of their own power. They +proceed no longer as the cannibal lady, but<a name="vol_ii_page_012" id="vol_ii_page_012"></a> by adopting and cultivating +the slave virtues, by making themselves agreeable to their masters, by +flattering their masters' vanity and sensuality—in other words by +exercising what we are accustomed to call "feminine charm."</p> + +<p>From early barbaric society up to the present day, we observe that there +are classes of women, just as there are classes of men. The position of +these classes changes within certain limits, but in broad outline the +conditions are fixed, and may be easily defined. There is, first of all, +the ruling class woman. She must have birth; she may or may not have +wealth, according as to whether the laws of that society or tribe permit +her to have possessions of her own, or to inherit anything from her +parents. If she has no wealth, then she will need beauty. She is the +woman who is selected by the ruling class man to bear his name and his +children, and to have charge of the household where these children are +reared, and trained for the inheriting of their father's wealth and the +carrying on of his position. This confers upon the ruling class woman +great dignity, and makes her a person of responsibility. She rules, not +merely over the slaves of the household, but over men of inferior social +classes, and in a few cases an exceptionally able woman has become a +queen, and ruled over men of her own class. This ruling class woman has +been known through all the ages by a special name, and the ways and +customs regarding her have been studied in an entertaining book, "The +Lady," by Emily James Putnam.</p> + +<p>Next in privilege and position to the "lady" is the mistress, the woman +who is selected by the ruling class man, not primarily to bear his +children, but to entertain and divert him. She may, of course, bear +children also. In barbaric societies, and up to quite recent times, the +importance of the ruling class man was indicated by the number of +concubines he had, and the position of these women was hardly inferior +to that of the wife or queen. In the days of the French monarchy, the +king's mistress was frequently more important than the queen; she was a +woman of ability, maintaining her supremacy in the intrigues of the +court. In ancient Greek society, the "hetairae" were a recognized class, +and Aspasia, the mistress of Pericles, was the most brilliant and most +conspicuous woman in Athens. In modern France, the position of the +mistress is recognized by the phrase <a name="vol_ii_page_013" id="vol_ii_page_013"></a>"demi-monde," or half-world. The +American plutocracy has developed upon a superstructure of Puritanism, +and therefore, in America, hypocrisy is necessary. But in the great +cities of America, the vast majority of the ruling class men keep +mistresses before marriage, and a great many keep them afterwards; and +these mistresses are coming to be more and more openly flaunted, and to +acquire more and more of what is called "social position." It is +possible now in the "smart set" for a lady to accept the status of +mistress, delicately veiled, without losing caste thereby, and actresses +and other free lance women who got their start in life by taking the +position of mistress, are coming more and more to be recognized as +"ladies," and to be received into what are called the "best circles."</p> + +<p>There remains to be considered the position of the lower class women. In +barbarous society these women were very little different from slaves. +They had no rights of their own, except such rights as their master man +chose to allow them for his own convenience. They were sold in marriage +by their parents, and they went where they were sold, and obeyed their +new master. They became his household drudges, and reserved their +affections for him; if they failed to do this, he stoned them to death, +or strangled them with a cord and tied them in a sack and threw them +into the river.</p> + +<p>And, of course, the rights of the master man yielded to the rights of +men of higher classes. The king or nobleman could take any woman he +wished at any time, and he made laws to this effect and enforced them. +In feudal society the lord of the manor claimed the right of the first +night with the wives of his serfs; this was one of the ruling class +privileges which was abolished in the French revolution. Wherever the +French revolution did not succeed in affecting land tenure, the right of +the land owner to prey upon his tenant girls continues as a custom, even +though it is not written in the law, and would be denied by the +hypocritical. It prevails in Poland, as you may discover by reading +Sienkiewicz's "Whirlpools"; it prevails in England, as you may discover +from Hardy's "Tess of the d'Urbervilles." You will find that it prevails +in every part of the world where women have poverty and men have wealth +and prestige, dress suits and automobiles. You will find it wherever +there are leisure class hotels, or colleges, or other gatherings of +ruling class young males. You<a name="vol_ii_page_014" id="vol_ii_page_014"></a> will find it in the theatrical and moving +picture worlds. It is well understood in the theatrical world of +Broadway that the woman "star" in the profession gets her start in life +by becoming the mistress of a manager or "angel." In the moving picture +world of Southern California it is a recognized convention, known to +everyone familiar with the business, that a young girl parts with her +virtue in exchange for an important job.<a name="vol_ii_page_015" id="vol_ii_page_015"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXX" id="CHAPTER_XXX"></a>CHAPTER XXX<br /><br /> +SEX AND YOUNG AMERICA</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses present-day sex arrangements, as they affect the future +generation.)</p></div> + +<p>Our first task is to consider how people actually behave in the matter +of sex—as distinguished from the way they pretend to behave. The first +and most necessary step in the cure of any disease is a correct +diagnosis, and in this case we have not merely to make the diagnosis, +but to prove it; because the most conspicuous fact about our present +sex-arrangements is a mass of organized concealment. Not merely do +teachers and preachers for the most part suppress all mention of these +subjects; but the defenders of our present economic disorder are +accustomed to acclaim the private property régime as the only basis of +family life. So long as people hold such an idea, there is no use trying +to teach them anything on the subject. There is no use talking to them +about monogamous love, because all they understand is hypocrisy. In this +chapter, therefore, we shall proceed to hold up the mirror in front of +capitalist morality.</p> + +<p>I pause and consider: Where shall I begin? At the top of society, or at +the bottom? With the city or the country? With the old or the young? I +think you care most of all about your boys and girls, so I am going to +tell you what is happening to the youth of America in these days of +triumphant reaction.</p> + +<p>I have a son, about whom naturally I think a great deal; just now he is +a student at one of our state universities, and he wrote me the other +day: "I went to a dance, and believe me, father, if you knew what these +modern dances mean, you would write something about them." I know what +they mean. They have come to us straight from the brothels of the +Argentine, among the vilest haunts of vice in the world. Others have +come from the jungle, where they were natural. The poor creature of the +jungle has his sex-desire and nothing else; he is not troubled with +brains, he does not have a complicated social organism to build up and<a name="vol_ii_page_016" id="vol_ii_page_016"></a> +protect, consequently he does not need what are called "morals." But we +civilized people need morals, and we are losing them, and our society is +disintegrating, going back to the howling and fighting and cannibalism +of the jungle.</p> + +<p>Prof. William James, America's greatest psychologist, tells us that +going through the motions appropriate to an emotion automatically causes +that emotion to be felt. If you watch an actor preparing to rush on the +stage in an emotional scene, you will see him walking about, clenching +his fists, stamping his feet, making ferocious faces, "working himself +up." And now, what do you think is going on in the minds of young men +and women, while with their bodies they are going through procedures +which are nothing and can be nothing but imitations of sexual contact?</p> + +<p>The parents, it appears, are ignorant and unsophisticated, and have left +it for the children to find out what these dances mean. In Rhode Island, +one of our oldest states, is Brown College, chosen by New England's +aristocracy for the education of its sons; and these boys go to social +affairs in the best homes in Providence, and they call them +"petting-parties." And here is what they write in their college paper:</p> + +<p>"The modern social bud drinks, not too much, often, but enough. She +smokes unguardedly, swears considerably, and tells 'dirty' stories. All +in all, she is a most frivolous, passionate, sensation-seeking little +thing."</p> + +<p>This statement, published in a college paper, causes a scandal, and a +newspaper reporter goes to interview the college boy who edits the +paper, and this boy talks. He tells how he met a lovely girl at a dance, +and his heart was thrilled with the rapture of young love. "Frankly, +between you and me, I was pretty smitten with this particular little +lady. Felt about her, don't you know, like a real guy feels about the +girl he could imagine himself married to. Thought she was too nice to +touch, almost; you know the grave sort of love affair a man always has +once in a lifetime. Well, we walked a bit, and I guess I didn't say +much, for a while. I felt plenty—respectfully—just the same. And as we +turned the corner of one of the buildings here, she grasped my hand. +Hers was trembling. 'Love and let love is my motto, dearie,' said this +seraph of my dreams; 'come, we're losing a lot of time getting started.' +That girl thought I was dead slow. She didn't know that just then I +imagined the great love of my<a name="vol_ii_page_017" id="vol_ii_page_017"></a> life was just entering the door. It was +cruel the way she got down from the pedestal I had built for her."</p> + +<p>Suppose I should ask you to name the influence that is having most to do +with shaping the thoughts of young America—what would you answer? +Undoubtedly, the moving pictures. It is from the "movies" that your +children learn what life is; if I can show you that a certain thing is +in the "movies," you can surely not deny that it is passing every day +and night into the hearts and minds of millions of our boys and girls. +Take a vote among the girls, what would they consider the most +delightful destiny in life; surely nine out of ten would answer, to +become a screen star, and pose before a world of admirers, and be paid a +million dollars a year. Make a test and see; and put that fact together +with the one I have already stated, that in order to get an important +job in the "movies," a girl must regularly and as a matter of course +part with her virtue.</p> + +<p>You will be told, no doubt, that this is a slanderous statement, so let +me give you a little evidence. I happened within the past year to be in +the private office of a well known moving picture producer, a man who is +married, and takes care to tell you that he loves his wife. He was +producing a play, the heroine of which was supposed to be a daughter of +Puritan New England. To play this part he had engaged a chaste girl, and +as a result was in the midst of a queer trouble, which he poured out to +me. His "leading man" had refused to act with this girl, insisting that +no girl could act a part of love unless she had had passionate +experience; no such thing had ever been heard of in moving pictures +before. Likewise, the director agreed that no girl who is chaste could +act for the screen, and the producer asked my advice about it. Mr. +William Allen White, of Kansas, was present in the office, and +authorizes me to state that he substantiates this anecdote. We both +advised the producer to stand by the girl, and he did so; and the +picture went out, and proved to be what in trade parlance is termed a +"frost"; that is to say, your children didn't care for it, and it cost +the producer something like a hundred thousand dollars to make this +attempt to defy the conventions of the moving picture world.</p> + +<p>I will tell you another story. I have a friend, a prominent man in Los +Angeles, who was appealed to by a young lady who wished to act in the +"movies." My friend introduced<a name="vol_ii_page_018" id="vol_ii_page_018"></a> this young lady to a very prominent +screen actor, who in turn introduced her to one of the biggest producers +in America, one of the men whose "million dollar feature pictures" are +regularly exploited. The producer examined the young lady's figure, and +told her that she would "do"; he added, quite casually, and as a matter +of course, that she would be expected to "pay the price." The young lady +took exception to this proposition, and gave up the chance. She told my +friend about it, and he, being a man of the world, accustomed to dealing +with the foibles of his fellowmen, wrote a note to the actor, explaining +that inasmuch as this young lady had been socially introduced to him, +and by him socially introduced to the manager, she should not have been +expected to "pay the price." To this the actor answered that my friend +was correct, and he would see the manager about it. The manager conceded +the point, and the young lady got her chance in the "movies" and made +good without "paying the price." This story tells you all you need to +know about the difference in sex ethics that society applies to the +"lady" and to the daughter of the common people.</p> + +<p>You know, of course, what is the stock theme of all moving pictures—the +virtuous daughter of the people, who resists all temptations, and is +finally rescued from her would-be seducer by the strong and sturdy arm +of a male doll. Could one ask a more perfect illustration of capitalist +hypocrisy than the fact that the girl who plays this role is required to +pay with her virtue for the privilege of playing it! And if you know +anything about young girls, you can watch her playing it on the screen, +and see from her every gesture that what I am telling you is true. My +wife knows young girls, and I took her, the other day, to see a moving +picture. She said: "I have solved a problem. When I come home on the +street-cars, it happens that I ride with a lot of young girls from the +high school. I have been watching them, and I couldn't imagine what was +the matter with them. All simple, girlish straightforwardness is gone +out of them; they are making eyes, in the strangest manner—and at +nobody; just practicing, apparently. They wear yearning facial +expressions; when they start to walk, they do not walk, but writhe and +wiggle. I thought there must be some nervous eye and lip disease got +abroad in the school. But now, when I go to a moving picture, I discover +what it means. They are imitating the 'stars' on the screen!"<a name="vol_ii_page_019" id="vol_ii_page_019"></a></p> + +<p>In these pictures, you know, there are "ingenues," young girls engaged +in making a happy ending to the story by capturing a rich lover; and +then there are "vamps," engaged in seducing young men, or breaking up +some happy home. In old-style melodrama it was possible to tell the +"ingenue" from the "vamps"; the former would trip lightly, and glance +coyly out of the corners of her eyes, while the "vamp" moved with slow, +languished writhing, blinking heavy-lidded, sinister eyes. But +now-a-days the "vamps" have learned to pose as "ingenues," and the +"ingenues" are as vicious as the "vamps"; they both make the same +glances, and culminate in the same sensual swoon. It is all sex, and +nothing else—except revolvers and fighting, and wild rushing about.</p> + +<p>And then, too, there are the musical comedies, made wholly out of sex, +being known as "girl shows," or more frankly still, "leg shows." A row +of half naked women, prancing and gyrating on the stage, and in front of +them rows of bald-headed old men, gazing at them greedily; also college +boys, or boys too imbecile to get through college, sending in their +cards with boxes of costly flowers. You will be shocked as you read my +plain statements of fact, but if you are the average American, you will +take your family to a musical show which has come straight from the +brothels of Paris, every allusion of which is obscene. I remember once +being in a small town in the South, when one of these "road shows" +arrived from New York, and I realized that this institution was simply a +traveling house of ill fame; the whole male portion of the town was +a-quiver with excitement, a mixture of lust and fear.</p> + +<p>I live in Southern California, one of many places in America where the +idle rich gather for their diversion. The country is dotted with +palatial hotels, and a golden flood of pleasure-seekers come in every +winter. I have talked with some of the college boys in this part of the +country, and also with teachers who try to save the boys; they report +these "swell" hotels as hot-beds of vice, haunted by married women with +automobiles, and nothing to do, who wish to go into the canyons for +sexual riots. Even elderly women, white-haired women, old enough to be +your grandmother! I have had them pointed out to me in these hotels, +their cheeks and lips covered with rouge, with pink silk tights on their +calves, and nothing else almost up to their knees and nothing at all<a name="vol_ii_page_020" id="vol_ii_page_020"></a> +half way down their backs. These old women seek to prey on boys, wanting +their youth, and being willing to lavish money upon them. They are +preying on your boys—you prosperous business men, who have preached the +gospel of "each for himself," and are proud of your skill to prey upon +society. You heap up your fortunes, and call it success, and are secure +and happy. You have made your children safe against want, you think; but +how are you going to make them safe against the "vamps" who prey upon +the overwhelming excitements of youth, and betray your sons before your +very eyes—teaching them lust in their youth, so that love may never be +born in their stunted hearts? All the haunts of "gilded vice" are +thriving, and somebody's boy is paying the interest on the capital, to +say nothing of paying the police.</p> + +<p>Many years ago I paid a call upon Anthony Comstock, head of the Society +for the Prevention of Vice. Comstock was an old-style Puritan, and many +insist that he was likewise an old-style grafter. However that may be, +he had a collection of the literature of pornography which would cause +any man to hesitate in condemning his activities. There is a vast +traffic in this kind of thing; it is sold by pack-peddlers all over the +country, and it is sold in little shops in the neighborhood of public +schools. You may be sure that in your school there are some boys who +know where to get it, even though they will not tell what they know. I +will describe just one piece that a school boy brought to me, a +catalogue of obscene literature, for sale in Spain, and to be ordered +wholesale. You know how men with wares to sell will expend their +imaginations and exhaust their vocabulary in describing to you the +charms of each particular article for sale. Here was a catalogue of one +or two hundred pages, listing thousands of items, pictures, pamphlets +and books, and various implements of vice, all set forth in that +imitation ecstasy of department stores and seed catalogues: here was +"something neat," here was a "fancy one," this one was "a peach," and +that one was "a winner."</p> + +<p>When I was a lad, I was tramping in the Adirondack mountains and was +picked up by an itinerant photographer. We rode all day together, and he +became friendly, and showed me some obscene pictures. Presently he +discovered that he was dealing with a young moralist, and apparently it +was the first time he had ever had that experience; he talked<a name="vol_ii_page_021" id="vol_ii_page_021"></a> honestly, +and we became friends on a different basis. This man had a wife and +children at home, but he traveled all over the mountains, and was like +the sailor with a girl in every port. Also he was thoroughly familiar +with all forms of unnatural vice, and took this also as a matter of +course, and spread it on his journeys.</p> + +<p>The other day I read a statement by a prominent physician in New York; +he had been talking with a police captain, and had asked him to state +what in his opinion was the most significant development in the social +life of New York. The answer was, "The spread of male prostitution." +Here is a subject to which I have to admit my courage is unequal. I +cannot repeat the jokes which I have heard young men tell about these +matters, and about the attitude of the police to them. Suffice it to say +that these hideous forms of vice are now the commonplace of the +under-world of all our great cities. The other day a friend of mine was +talking with a prostitute who had left a high-class resort, where the +price charged was ten dollars, and gone to live in a "fifty-cent house," +frequented by sailors. She was asked the reason, and her explanation +was, "The sailors are natural." Dr. William J. Robinson has written in +his magazine an account of the haunts in Berlin which are frequented by +the victims of unnatural vice, there allowed to meet openly and to +solicit. Frank Harris, in his "Life of Oscar Wilde," tells how when that +scandal was at its height, and further exposure threatened, swarms of +the most prominent men in England suddenly discovered that it was +advisable for them to travel on the Continent. The great public schools +of England are rotten with these practices; the younger boys learn them +from the older ones, and are victims all the rest of their lives. And +the corruption is creeping through our own social body—and you think +that all you have to do is not to know about it!</p> + +<p>My friend Floyd Dell, reading this manuscript, insists that this chapter +and the one following are too severe. In case others should agree with +him, I quote two newspaper items which appear while I am reading the +proofs. The first is from an interview with H. Gordon Selfridge, the +London merchant, telling his impressions of America. He tells about the +"flappers," and then about the "shifters."</p> + +<p>"The other is the newly exploited 'shifters.' The 'shifters' are an +organization of mushroom growth among high school<a name="vol_ii_page_022" id="vol_ii_page_022"></a> girls and boys which +is spreading through the eastern States and winning converts among +youngsters. It is described as the 'flapper Ku Klux,' and its emblem, if +worn by a girl, according to high school teachers and children's society +leaders who oppose it, to be nothing more nor less than an invitation to +be kissed.</p> + +<p>"To call it an organization even is exaggeration, for the 'shifters' are +better described as a secret understanding without any responsible head.</p> + +<p>"From being a seemingly harmless group whose emblem was originally a +brass paper clip fastened in the coat lapel it has developed by rapid +strides. Manufacturers of emblems are coining money by the sale of +hands, palm outstretched. The significance is take what you want or, as +the motto of the order says, 'be a good fellow; get something for +nothing.' One of the principles is to 'do' one's parents, referred to as +'they.'"</p> + +<p>The second item is an Associated Press despatch:</p> + +<p>"ST. LOUIS, March 10.—In reiterating his statement that a girls' and a +boys' secret organization requiring that all applicants must have +violated the moral code before admission was granted, existed in a local +high school, Victor J. Miller, president of the Board of Police +Commissioners, tonight named the Soldan High School as the one in which +the alleged immoral conditions exist. The school is attended largely by +children of the wealthy West End citizens.<a name="vol_ii_page_023" id="vol_ii_page_023"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXI" id="CHAPTER_XXXI"></a>CHAPTER XXXI<br /><br /> +SEX AND THE "SMART SET"</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Portrays the moral customs of those who set the fashion in our +present-day world.)</p></div> + +<p>We have discussed what is happening to our young people; let us next +consider what our mature people are doing. Having mentioned conditions +in England, I will give a glimpse of London "high life" two years before +the war.</p> + +<p>As a visiting writer, I was invited to luncheon at the home of a woman +novelist, whose books at that time were widely read both in her country +and here. Present at the luncheon was a prominent publisher, who I +afterwards learned was the lady's lover; also the lady's grown and +married son. The publisher looked like a buxom hunting squire, but the +lady told me that he was very unhappy, because his wife would not +divorce him. The lady had just come from a week-end party at the home of +an earl, who at this moment occupies one of the highest posts in the +gift of the British Empire. Things had gone comically wrong at this +country house party, she said, because the hostess had failed to +remember that Lord So-and-so was at present living with Lady +Somebody-else. One of the duties of hostesses at house parties, it +appears, is to know who is living with whom, in order that they may be +put in connecting rooms. In this case his Lordship had been grouchy, and +everybody's pleasure had been spoiled.</p> + +<p>This produced a discussion of the subject of marriage, and the son +remarked that marriage was like an old slipper; you wore it, because you +had got used to it, but you did not talk about it, because it was +unimportant and stupid. I went away, and happened to mention these +matters to a friend, who had met this woman novelist in Nice. The +novelist had there, in a group of people, been introduced to a young +girl who was suffering from neurasthenia. "My dear," said the novelist, +affectionately, "what you need is to have an illegitimate baby."</p> + +<p>This, you will say, is the "old world," and you always<a name="vol_ii_page_024" id="vol_ii_page_024"></a> knew that it was +corrupt. If so, let me tell you a few things that I have seen among the +"upper circles" of our own great and virtuous democracy. My first +acquaintance with New York "society" came after the publication of "The +Jungle." As the author of that book I was a sensation, almost as much so +as if I had won the heavy-weight championship of the world. Out of +curiosity I accepted an invitation for a weekend amid what is called the +"hunting set" of Long Island. Here was a gorgeous palace with many +tapestries, and soft-footed servants, and decanters and cocktails at +every stage of one's journey about the place, like coaling stations on +the trade routes of the British Empire. One of the first sights that +caught my young eye was a large and stately lady in semi-undress, +smoking a big black cigar. If I were to mention her name, every +newspaper reader in America would know her; and before I had been +introduced to her, I heard two young men in evening dress make an +obscene remark about her, and what she was waiting for that evening.</p> + +<p>I discovered quickly that, while there was a great deal of sex among +these people, there was very little love. There was principally a wish +to score cleverly and subtly at the expense of another person's +feelings. It is called the "smart set," you understand, and I will give +you an idea of how "smart" it is. I was walking down a passage with a +lady, and on a couch sat another lady, side by side with a certain very +famous lawyer, whose golden eloquence you have probably listened to from +platforms, and whom for the purpose of this anecdote I will name Jones. +Mr. Jones and the lady on the sofa were sitting very close together, and +my companion, with a bright smile over her shoulder, called out: "Be +careful, Mary; you'll be scattering a lot of little Joneses around here +if you don't watch out!" Quite "continental," you perceive; and a long +way from the Puritanism of our ancestors!</p> + +<p>From there I went to the billiard-room, and observed a young man of +fashion trying to play billiards when he was half drunk. It was a funny +spectacle, and they took away his cigarette by force, for fear he would +drop it on the cloth of the billiard table. Pretty soon he was telling +about a racing meet, and an orgy with negro women in a stable. Therefore +I returned to where the ladies were gathered, and one middle-aged +matron, who had read widely, including some of my books, engaged me in +serious conversation. I came later on to<a name="vol_ii_page_025" id="vol_ii_page_025"></a> know her rather well, and she +told me her views of love; the source of all the sex troubles of +humanity was that they took the relationship seriously. Modern +discoveries made it unnecessary to attach importance to it. She herself, +acting upon this theory, probably had had relations with—my friends, +reading the proofs of this book, beg me to omit the number of men, +because you would not believe me!</p> + +<p>You may argue that this is not typical; say that I fell into the +clutches of some particular group of degenerates. All I can tell you is +that these people are as "socially prominent" as any in New York City. I +will say furthermore that I have sat in the home of the best known +corporation lawyer in America, who was paid a million dollars to +organize the steel trust—the late James B. Dill, at that time a member +of the Court of Appeals of New Jersey—and have heard him "muck-rake" +his business friends by the hour with stories of that sort. I have heard +him tell of the "steel crowd" hiring a trolley car and a load of +prostitutes and champagne, and taking an all-night trip from one city to +another, smashing up both the car and the prostitutes. I have heard him +tell of sitting on the deck of a Sound steamer, and overhearing two of +his Wall Street associates and their wives arranging to trade partners +for the night.</p> + +<p>I have mentioned a lady who had a great many lovers. Once in the +dining-room of a club on Fifth Avenue, commonly known as "the +Millionaires'," a companion pointed out various people, many of whom I +had read about in the newspapers, and told me funny stories about them. +"See that old boy with a note-book," said my host. "That is Jacob +So-and-so, and he is entering up the cost of his lunch. He keeps +accounts of everything, even of his women. He told me he had had over a +thousand, and they had cost him over a million."</p> + +<p>It is impossible to say what is the most terrible thing in capitalist +society, but among the most terrible are assuredly the old men. The +richest and most powerful banker in America was in his sex habits the +merry jest of New York society. He took toward women the same attitude +as King Edward VII; if he wanted one, he went up and asked for her, and +it made no difference who she was, or where she was. This man's personal +living expenses were five thousand dollars a day, and all women +understood that they might have anything within reason.<a name="vol_ii_page_026" id="vol_ii_page_026"></a></p> + +<p>When I was a boy, living in New York, there was a certain aged +money-lender about whom one read something in the newspapers almost +every day. He was a prominent figure, because he was worth eighty +millions, yet wore an old, rusty black suit, and saved every penny. +Every now and then you would read in the paper how some woman had been +arrested for attempting to blackmail him in his office. It seemed +puzzling, because you wouldn't think of him as a likely subject for +blackmail. Some years later I met Dorothy Richardson, author of "The +Long Day," a very fine book which has been undeservedly forgotten. Miss +Richardson had been a reporter for the New York <i>Herald</i>, and had been +sent to interview this old money-lender. She was ushered into his +private office, and as soon as the attendant had gone out and closed the +door, the old man came up, and without a word of preliminaries grabbed +her in his arms like a gorilla. She fought and scratched, and got out, +and was wise enough to say nothing about it; therefore there was nothing +published about another attempt to blackmail the aged money-lender!</p> + +<p>What this means is that men of unlimited means live lives of unbridled +lust, and then in their old age they are helpless victims of their own +impulses. There was a certain enormously wealthy United States Senator +from West Virginia, who came very near being Vice President of the +United States. This doddering old man would go about the streets of +Washington with a couple of very decorous and carefully trained +attendants; and whenever an attractive young woman would pass on the +street, or when one would approach the Senator, these two attendants +would quietly slip their arms into his and hold him fast. They would do +this so that the ordinary person would not suspect what was going on, +but would think the old man was being supported.</p> + +<p>You do not have to take these things on my word; the newspapers are full +of them all the time, and they are proven in court. Just now as I write, +the president of the most powerful bank in America is claiming in court +that his children are not his own, but that their father is an Indian +guide. His wife, on the other hand, is accusing the banker of having +played the role of husband to several other women. He would take these +women traveling on his yacht, which, quaintly enough, was termed the +"Modesty."</p> + +<p>Also the papers have been full of the "Hamon case."<a name="vol_ii_page_027" id="vol_ii_page_027"></a> Here is a wealthy +man, Republican National Committeeman from Oklahoma, who is about to go +to Washington to advise our new President whom to appoint to office from +that state. Before he goes, he casts off his mistress, and she shoots +him. She was his secretary, it appears, and helped him to make his +fortune; she has made many friends, and a million dollars is spent to +save her life. The prosecuting attorney calls her a "painted snake," and +accuses her of having sat week after week "displaying to the jury +twenty-four inches of silk stockinged shin-bone." The jury, apparently +unable to withstand this allurement, acquits the woman, and she +announces that she intends to bring suit under the man's will to get his +money! Also, she is going into the "movies," and tells us that it is to +be "for educational purposes." Everything in our capitalist society must +be "educational," you understand. It was P. T. Barnum who discovered +that the American people would flock to look at a five-legged calf, if +it was presented as "educational."</p> + +<p>The moving pictures and the theatres are the honey-pots which gather the +feminine beauty and youthful charm of our country for the convenience of +rich men's lust. These girls swarm in the theatrical agencies, and in +the artists' studios; they starve for a while, and finally they yield. +In every great city there are thousands of men of wealth, whose only +occupation is to prey upon such girls. I know a certain theatrical +manager, the most famous in the United States, a sensual, stout little +Jew. He is a man of culture and subtle insight, and in the course of his +conversation he described to me, quite casually and as a matter of +course, the charm of deflowering a virgin. Nothing could equal that +sensation; the first time was the last.</p> + +<p>Many years ago there was a horrible scandal in New York. The most famous +architect in America was murdered, and the newspapers probed into his +life, and it was revealed to us that many of the most famous artists and +men about town in New York maintained elaborate studios, equipped with +every luxury, all the paraphernalia of all the vices of the ages; and +through these places there flowed an endless stream of beautiful young +girls. In every large city in America you will find an "athletic club," +and if you go there and listen to the gossip, you discover that there +are scores of idle rich men with automobiles and private apartments, and +a staff of procurers<a name="vol_ii_page_028" id="vol_ii_page_028"></a> used in preying, not merely upon young girls, but +also upon young boys. And these are not merely the children of the poor, +they are the children of all but the rich and powerful. In the "movies" +you see pictures of girls lured into automobiles, and carried out into +the country, or seduced by means of "knock-out drops," and you think +this is just "melodrama"; but it is happening all the time. In every big +city of our country the police know that hundreds of young girls +disappear every year. At a recent convention of police chiefs in +Washington, it was stated, from police records, that sixty thousand +girls disappear every year in the United States, leaving no trace. +Unless the parents happen to be in position to make a fuss, not even the +names of the girls are published in the newspapers. I do not ask you to +believe such things on my word; believe District Attorney Sims of +Chicago, who made the most thorough study of this subject ever made in +America, and wrote:</p> + +<p>"When a white slave is sold and landed in a house or dive she becomes a +prisoner.... In each of these places is a room having but one door, to +which the keeper holds the key. Here are locked all the street clothes, +shoes and ordinary apparel.... The finery provided for the girls is of a +nature to make their appearance on the street impossible. Then in +addition to this handicap, the girl is placed at once in debt to the +keeper for a wardrobe.... She cannot escape while she is in debt, and +she can never get out of debt. Not many of the women in this class +expect to live more than ten years—perhaps the average is less. Many +die painful deaths by disease, many by consumption, but it is hardly +beyond the truth to say that suicide is their general expectation."<a name="vol_ii_page_029" id="vol_ii_page_029"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXII" id="CHAPTER_XXXII"></a>CHAPTER XXXII<br /><br /> +SEX AND THE POOR</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses prostitution, the extent of its prevalence, and the +diseases which result from it.)</p></div> + +<p>It is manifest that the rich cannot indulge in vices, without drawing +the poor after them; and in addition to this, the poor have their own +evil instincts, which fester in neglect. There were several hundred +thousand dark rooms, that is rooms without light or ventilation, in New +York City before the war. Now the country is reported to be short a +million homes, and in New York City working girls are sleeping six or +eight in a room. In the homes of the poor in the slums, parents and +children and boarders all sleep in one room indiscriminately, and the +world moves back to that primitive communism, in which incest is an +everyday affair, and little children learn all the vices there are. I +have in my hand a pamphlet by a physician, in charge of a hospital in +New York, who in fifteen years has examined nine hundred children who +have been raped, and the age of the youngest was eight months! I have +another pamphlet by a settlement worker, who discusses the problem of +the thousands of deserted wives, most of them with children, many with +children yet unborn. As I write, there are millions of men out of work +in our country, and these men are desperate, and they quit and take to +the road. They join the army of the casual workers, the "blanket +stiffs"; and, of course, the more there are of these men, the more +prostitutes there have to be, and the more homosexuality there will +inevitably be.</p> + +<p>Also the girls are out of work, and are on the streets. Many years ago I +visited the mill towns of New England, "she-towns" they are called, and +one of the young fellows said to me that you could buy a girl there for +the price of a sandwich. Read "The Long Day," to which I have previously +referred, and see how our working girls live. Dorothy Richardson +describes her room-mate, who read cheap novels which she found in the +gutter weeklies. She read them over and over; when she had got to the +bottom of the<a name="vol_ii_page_030" id="vol_ii_page_030"></a> pile, she began again, because her mind was so weak that +she had forgotten everything. And then one day Miss Richardson happened +to be groping in a corner of a closet, and came upon a great pile of +bottles, and examined them, and was made sick with horror—abortion +mixtures.</p> + +<p>Dr. William J. Robinson, an authority on the subject, estimates that +there are one million abortions in the United States every year. Some of +these are accidental, caused by venereal disease, but the vast majority +are deliberate acts, crimes under the law, murder of human life. Dr. +Robinson also estimates, from the many thousands of cases which come to +him, that ninety-five per cent of all men have at some time practiced +self-abuse. He is a strenuous opponent of what he calls "hysteria" on +the subject of venereal disease, and insists that its prevalence is +exaggerated; that instead of one person in ten being syphilitic, as is +commonly stated, the proportion is only one in twenty. He insists that +the percentage of persons having had gonorrhea is only twenty-five per +cent, instead of seventy-five or eighty-five. I find that other +authorities generally agree in the statement that fifty per cent of +young men become infected with some venereal disease before they reach +the age of thirty. The Committee of Seven in New York estimated in 1903 +that there were two hundred thousand cases of syphilis in the city, and +eight hundred thousand of gonorrhea. There were villages in France +before the war in which twenty-five per cent of the inhabitants were +syphilitic, and in Russia there were towns in which it was said that +every person was syphilitic. We may safely say that these latter are the +only towns in Europe in which there was not an enormous increase of this +disease during and since the war.</p> + +<p>What are the consequences of these diseases? The consequences are +frightful suffering, not merely to persons guilty of immorality, but to +innocent persons. Dr. Morrow, generally recognized as the leading +authority on this subject, estimates that ten per cent of all wives are +infected with venereal disease by their husbands; he estimates that +thirty per cent of all the infected women in New York were wives who had +got the disease from their husbands. It is estimated that thirty per +cent of all the births, where either parent has syphilis, result in +abortions. It is estimated that fifty per cent of childlessness in +marriage is caused by gonorrhea, and <a name="vol_ii_page_031" id="vol_ii_page_031"></a>twenty-five per cent of all +existing blindness. In Germany, before the war, there were thirty +thousand persons born blind from this cause. It is estimated that +ninety-five per cent of all abdominal operations performed upon women +are due to gonorrhea. And any of these horrors may fall upon persons who +lead lives of the strictest chastity. There was a case reported in +Germany of 236 children who contracted venereal disease from swimming in +a public bath.</p> + +<p>All these things are products of our system of +marriage-plus-prostitution. They are all part of that system, and no +study of the system is complete without them. Everywhere throughout +modern civilization prostitution is an enormous and lucrative industry. +In New York it is estimated to give employment to two hundred thousand +women, to say nothing of the managers, and the runners, and the men who +live off the women. There are thousands of resorts, large and small, +high-priced and cheap, and the police know all about it, and derive a +handsome income from it. And you find it the same in every great city of +the world; in every port where sailors land, or every place where crowds +of men are expected. If there is to be a football game, or a political +convention, the managers of the industry know about it, and while they +may never have heard the libel that Socialism preaches sexual license, +they all know that capitalism practices it, and they provide the +necessary means. In the United States there are estimated to be a half a +million prostitutes, counting the inmates of houses alone.</p> + +<p>During the late war, at the army bases in France, the British government +maintained official brothels; but if you published anything about this +in England, you ran a chance of having your paper suppressed. During the +occupation of the Rhine country, the French sent in negro troops, +savages from the heart of Africa, whose custom it is to cut off the ears +of their enemies in battle; and the French army compelled the German +population to supply white women for these troops. I have quoted in "The +Brass Check" a pious editorial from the Los Angeles <i>Times</i>, bidding the +mothers of America be happy, because "our boys in France" were safe in +the protecting arms of the Y. M. C. A. and the Knights of Columbus. I +dared not publish at this time a passage which I had clipped from the +London <i>Clarion</i>, in which A. M. Thompson told how he watched the +"doughboys" in the cafés<a name="vol_ii_page_032" id="vol_ii_page_032"></a> of Paris, with a girl on each knee, and a +glass of wine in each hand.</p> + +<p>I will add one little anecdote, giving you a glimpse of the sex +conventions of war. The American army made desperate efforts to keep +down venereal disease, and required all men to report to their +regimental surgeon immediately after having had sex relations. Our army +moved into Coblentz, and the regulations strictly forbade any +fraternizing with the inhabitants. But immediately it was discovered +that there was an increase of disease, and investigation was made, and +revealed that men had been ceasing to report to the surgeons, because +they were afraid of being punished for having "fraternized with the +enemy." So a new order was issued, providing that having sexual +intercourse would not be considered as "fraternizing." I do not know any +better way to distinguish my ideal of morality from the military ideal, +than to say that according to my understanding of it, the sex +relationship should always and everywhere imply and include +"fraternizing."</p> + +<p>Finally, in concluding this picture of our present-day sex arrangements, +there is a brief word to be said about divorce. In the year 1916, the +last statistics available as I write, there were just over a million +marriages in the United States, and there were over one hundred and +twelve thousand divorces. This would indicate that one marriage in every +nine resulted in shipwreck. But as a matter of fact the proportion is +greater, because the marriages necessarily precede the divorces, and the +proportion of divorces in 1916 should be calculated upon the number of +marriages which took place some five or ten years previously. Of the one +million marriages in 1916, we may say that one in seven or one in eight +will end in the divorce courts. Let this suffice for a glimpse of the +system of marriage-plus-prostitution—a field of weeds which we have +somehow to plow up and prepare for a harvest of rational and honest +love!<a name="vol_ii_page_033" id="vol_ii_page_033"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXIII" id="CHAPTER_XXXIII"></a>CHAPTER XXXIII<br /><br /> +SEX AND NATURE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Maintains that our sex disorders are not the result of natural or +physical disharmony.)</p></div> + +<p>Elie Metchnikoff, one of the greatest of scientists, wrote a book +entitled "The Nature of Man," in which he studied the human organism +from the point of view of biology, demonstrating that in our bodies are +a number of relics of past stages of evolution, no longer useful, but +rather a source of danger and harm. We have, for example, in the inner +corner of the eye a relic of that third eyelid whereby the eagle is +enabled to look at the sun. This is a harmless relic. But we have also +an appendix, a degenerate organ of digestion, or gland of secretion, +which now serves as a center of infection and source of danger. We have +likewise a lower bowel, a survival of our hay-eating days, and a cause +of autointoxication and premature death. Among the sources of trouble, +Metchnikoff names the fact that the human male possesses a far greater +quantity of sexual energy than is required for purposes of procreation. +This becomes a cause of disharmony and excess, it causes man to wreck +his health and destroy himself.</p> + +<p>Manifestly, this is a serious matter; for if it is true, our efforts to +find health and happiness in love are doomed to failure, and Lecky is +right when he describes the prostitute as the "guardian of virtue," the +eternal and necessary scapegoat of humanity. But I do not believe it is +true; I think that here is one more case of the endless blundering of +scientists and philosophers who attempt to teach physiology, politics, +religion and law, without having made a study of economics. I do not +believe that the sex troubles of mankind are physiological in their +nature, but have their origin in our present system of class privilege. +I believe they are caused, not by the blunders of nature, but by the +blunders of man as a social animal.</p> + +<p>Let us take a glimpse at primitive man. I choose the Marquesas Islands, +because we have complete reports about<a name="vol_ii_page_034" id="vol_ii_page_034"></a> them from numerous observers. +Here was a race of people, not interfered with by civilization, who +manifested all that overplus of sexual energy to which Metchnikoff calls +attention. They placed no restraint whatever upon sex activity, they had +no conception of such an idea. Their games and dances were sex play, and +so also, in great part, was their religion. Yet we do not find that they +wrecked themselves. Physically speaking, they were one of the most +perfect races of which we have record. Both the men and women were +beautiful; they were active and strong from childhood to old age, +and—here is the significant thing—they were happy. They were a +laughing, dancing, singing race. They hardly knew grief or fear at all. +They knew how to live, and they enjoyed every process and aspect of +their lives, just as children do, naively and simply. This included +their sex life; and I think it assures us that there can be no such +fundamental physical disharmony in the human organism as the great +Russian scientist thought he had discovered.</p> + +<p>Is it not a fact that throughout nature a superfluity of any kind of +energy or product may be a source of happiness, rather than of distress? +Consider the singing of the birds! Or consider nature's impulse to cover +a field with useless plants, and how by a little cunning, we are able to +turn it into a harvest for our own use! In the life of our bodies one +may show the same thing again and again. We have within us the +possibility of and the impulse toward more muscular activity than our +survival makes necessary; but we do not regard this additional energy as +a curse of nature, and a peril to our lives—we turn out and play +baseball. We have an impulse to see more than is necessary, so we climb +mountains, or go traveling. We have an impulse to hear more, so we go to +a concert. We have an impulse to think more, so we play chess, or whist, +or write books and accumulate libraries. Never do we think of these +activities as signs of an irrevocable blunder on the part of nature.</p> + +<p>But about the activities of love we feel differently; and why is this? +If I say that it is because we have an unwholesome and degraded attitude +toward love, because, as a result of religious superstition we fear it, +and dare not deal with it honestly, the reader may suspect that I am +preparing to hint at some self-indulgence, some form of sex orgy such as +the "turkey trot" and the "bunny hug" and the "grizzly<a name="vol_ii_page_035" id="vol_ii_page_035"></a> bear," the +"shimmy" and the "toddle" and the "cuddle." I hasten to explain that I +do not mean any of the abnormalities and monstrosities of present-day +fashionable life. Neither do I mean that we should set out to emulate +the happy cannibals in the South Seas. In the Book of the Mind I set +forth as carefully as I knew how, the difference between nature and man, +the life of instinct and the life of reason. It is my conviction that if +civilized life is to go on, there must be a far wider extension of +judgment and self-control in human affairs; our lost happiness will be +found, not by going "back to nature," but by going forward to a new and +higher state, planned by reason and impelled by moral idealism.</p> + +<p>But we find ourselves face to face with horrible sex disorders, and a +great scientist tells us they are nature's tragic blunder, of which we +are the helpless victims. Manifestly, the way to decide this question is +to go to nature, and see if primitive people, having the same physical +organism as ours, had the same troubles and spent their lives in the +same misery. If they did, then it may be that we are doomed; but if they +did not, then we can say with certainty that it is not nature, but +ourselves, who have blundered. Our task then becomes to apply reason to +the problem; to take our present sex arrangements, our field of +bad-smelling weeds, and plow it thoroughly, and sow it with good seed, +and raise a harvest of happiness in love. It is my belief that, +admitting true love—honest and dignified and rational love—it is +possible to pour into it any amount of sex energy, to invent a whole new +system of beautiful and happy love play.<a name="vol_ii_page_036" id="vol_ii_page_036"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXIV" id="CHAPTER_XXXIV"></a>CHAPTER XXXIV<br /><br /> +LOVE AND ECONOMICS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Maintains that our sex disorders are of social origin, due to the +displacing of love by money as a motive in mating.)</p></div> + +<p>If the cause of our sex disorders is not physiological, what is it? +Everything in nature must have a cause, and this includes human nature, +the actions and feelings of men, both as individuals and as groups. We +hear the saying: "You can't change human nature"; but the fact is that +human nature is one of the most changeable things in the world. We can +watch it changing from age to age, for better or for worse, and if we +had the intelligence to use the forces now at our command, we could mold +human nature, as precisely as a brewer converts a carload of hops into a +certain brand of beer. Voltaire was author of the saying, "Vice and +virtue are products like vinegar."</p> + +<p>Our civilization is based upon industrial exploitation and class +privilege, the monopoly of the means of production and the natural +sources of wealth by a group. This enables the privileged group to live +in idleness upon the labor of the rest of society; it confers unlimited +power with practically no responsibility—a strain which not one human +being in a thousand has the moral strength to endure. History for the +past five thousand years is one demonstration after another that the +conferring upon a class of power without responsibility means the +collapse of that class and the downfall of its civilization.</p> + +<p>So far as concerns the ruling class male, what the system of privilege +does is to give him unlimited ability to indulge his sex desires. What +it does for the female is to submit her to the male desires, and to +abolish that mutuality in sex, that interaction between male and female +influence, which is the very essence of its purpose. Woman, in a +predatory society, is subject to a double enslavement, that of class as +well as of sex, and the result is the perverting of sexual selection, +and a constantly increasing tendency towards the survival of the unfit.<a name="vol_ii_page_037" id="vol_ii_page_037"></a></p> + +<p>In a state of nature the males compete among themselves for the favor of +the female. The female is not raped, nor is she kidnapped; on the +contrary, she exercises her prerogative, she inspects the various male +charms which are set before her, and selects those which please her, +according to her deeply planted instincts. The result is that the weak +and unfit males seldom have a chance to reproduce themselves, and the +procreating is done by the highest specimens of the type.</p> + +<p>But now we have a world which is ruled by money, in which opportunity, +and indeed survival, depend upon money, and the whole tendency of +society is to make money standards supreme. We do not like to admit +this, of course; our instincts revolt against it, and our higher +faculties reinforce the revolt, so we carefully veil our money motives, +and invent polite phrases to conceal them. You will hear people deny it +is money which determines admission into what is called "society," the +intimate life of the ruling class. They will tell you that it is not +money, it is "good taste," "refinement," "charm of personality," and so +on. But if you analyze all these things, you speedily discover that they +are made out of money; they are symbols of the possession of money, +devised by those who possess it, as a means of keeping themselves apart +from those who do not possess it. I would safely defy a member of the +ruling class to name a single element in what he calls "refinement," or +"good taste," that is not in its ultimate analysis a symbol of the +possession of money. Let it be the pronunciation of a word, or the cut +of a coat, or the method of handling a fork—whatever it may be, it is +part of a code, revealing that the person, or more important yet, the +ancestors of the person, have belonged to the leisure class, and have +had time and opportunity to learn to do things in a certain precise +conventional way. I say "conventional," for very frequently these tests +have no relationship whatever to reality. Considered as a matter of +common sense and convenience, it is a great deal better to eat peas with +a spoon than with a fork, and to use both a knife and fork in eating +lettuce; but if you eat peas with a spoon, or use a knife on lettuce, +every member of the ruling class will instantly know that you are an +interloper, as much so as if you took to throwing the china at your +hostess.</p> + +<p>Our culture is a money culture, our standards are money<a name="vol_ii_page_038" id="vol_ii_page_038"></a> standards, and +our sex decisions are based upon money, not upon love. Any man can have +money in our society, provided the accident of birth favors him, and it +is everywhere known that any man who has money can get a wife. It is +certainly not true that any man with <i>no</i> money can get a wife, and it +is true that most men who have little money have to take wives who have +less—that is, who belong to a lower class, according to the world's +standards. The average young girl of the propertied classes is trained +for marriage as for any other business. She is taught to be sexually +cold, but to imitate sexual excitement deliberately, so as to arouse it +in the male, and to keep herself surrounded with a swarm of males; this +being the basis of her prestige, the factor which will cause the +"eligible" man, the "catch," to desire her. In polite society this +proceeding is known as "coquetry," or "charm," and it would be no +exaggeration to say that seventy-five per cent of all the novels so far +written in the world are expositions of this activity; also that when we +go to the theater, we go in order to watch and sympathize with these +manifestations of pecuniary sexuality.</p> + +<p>As a rule the young girl knows what she is doing, but she is taught to +camouflage it, to preserve her "innocence." She would not dream of +marrying for money; she wants to marry something "distinguished"—that +is to say, something which has received the stamp of approval from a +world which approves money. She wants to marry somebody who is +"elegant," who is in "good form"; she wants to marry without having to +think about the horrid subject of money at all, and so she is carefully +chaperoned, and confined to a world where nothing but money is to be +met. In Tennyson's poem, "The Northern Farmer," the old fellow is +coaching his son on the subject of marriage, and they are driving along +a road, and the farmer listens to his horses' hoofs, and they are +saying, "Proputty, proputty, proputty!" The farmer sums up in one +sentence the doctrine of pecuniary marriage as it is taught to the +ruling class virgin: "Doän't thee marry for money, but goä wheer money +is."</p> + +<p>In this process, of course, the ruling class virgin must spend a great +deal of money in order to keep up her own prestige; and when she is +married, she must spend it to keep up the prestige of her unmarried +sisters, and then of her children. As a result of this, the only ruling +class males<a name="vol_ii_page_039" id="vol_ii_page_039"></a> who can afford to marry are the rich ones. There are always +some who are richer, and these are the most desirable; so the tendency +with each generation is to put the period of marriage further off; the +man has to wait until he has accumulated enough "proputty" to satisfy +the girl of his desires—a girl whom he admires because of her pecuniary +prestige. He delays, and meantime he satisfies his passions with the +daughters of the poor. As a result of this, when he does finally come to +marry, he is apt to be unlovely and unlovable. The woman frequently does +not love him at all, but takes him cold-bloodedly because he is +"eligible"; in that case she is a cold and "sexless" wife. Or else, +after she has married him she discovers his unloveliness, and either +decides that all men are selfish brutes, and reconciles herself to a +celibate life, or else she goes out and preys upon the domestic +happiness of other women.<a name="vol_ii_page_040" id="vol_ii_page_040"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXV" id="CHAPTER_XXXV"></a>CHAPTER XXXV<br /><br /> +MARRIAGE AND MONEY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the causes of prostitution, and that higher form of +prostitution known as the "marriage of convenience.")</p></div> + +<p>I realize that all these sex problems are complicated. Every case is +individual, and in no two cases can you give exactly the same +explanation. But it is my thesis that whatever the cause, if you trace +down the causes of the cause, you will find economic inequality and +class privilege. It is evident in the lives of the rich, and it is even +more evident in the lives of the poor, who are not permitted the luxury +of pretense. The poor live in a world dominated by forces which they +seldom understand, subjected to enormous pressure which crushes and +destroys them, without their being able to see it or touch it. In the +world of the poor there is first of all poverty; there is insecurity of +employment and insufficiency of wage, and the daily and hourly terror of +starvation and ruin. Above this is a world of power and luxury, a +wonderland of marvels and thrills, seen through a colored mist of +romance. The working-class girl, born to drudgery and perpetual +child-bearing, has a brief hour in which her cheeks are red and her +beauty is ripe; and out of the heaven above her steps a male creature +panoplied in the armor of ruling class prestige—that is to say, a dress +suit—and scattering about him a shower of automobile rides, jewelry and +candy and flowers. She opens her arms to him; and then, when her brief +hour of rapture is past, she becomes the domestic drudge of some +workingman, or else the inmate of a brothel.</p> + +<p>It is a custom of social workers and church people, seeking data about +these painful subjects, to interview numbers of prostitutes, and +question them as to the causes of their "fall"; so you read statistics +to the effect that seventeen per cent of prostitution has an economic +cause, that twenty-six per cent is caused by love of finery, etc. These +pious people, employed by the ruling class to maintain ruling class +prestige by demonstrating that wage slavery has nothing to do with<a name="vol_ii_page_041" id="vol_ii_page_041"></a> +white slavery, attain their purpose by restricting the word "economic" +to food and shelter; forgetting that young girls do not live by bread +alone, but also by ribbons, and silk stockings, and moving picture +shows, and trips to Coney Island, and everything else that gives a +momentary escape from drudgery into joy. We all understand, of course, +that the daughters of the rich are entitled to joy, and we provide them +with it as a matter of course; but the daughters of the poor are +supposed to work in a cotton mill ten or eleven hours a day from +earliest childhood, and the joy we provide for them is vicarious. As a +woman poet sets it forth:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">"The golf links lie so near the mill</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 2em;">That almost every day</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: .25em;">The laboring children can look out</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 2em;">And see the men at play."</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>Some years ago my wife and I were invited to meet Mrs. Mary J. Goode, a +keeper of brothels in the "Tenderloin," who had revolted against the +system of police graft, and had exposed it in the newspapers. My wife +questioned her closely as to the psychology of people in her business, +and she insisted that the majority of prostitutes were not oversexed, +nor were they feeble minded; they were women who had loved and trusted, +and had been "thrown down." As Mrs. Goode phrased it, they said to +themselves: "Never again! After this, they'll pay!"</p> + +<p>As a matter of fact, the causes of prostitution are so largely economic +that the other factors are hardly worth mentioning. The sale of sex is +unknown in savage society, and would be unknown in a Socialist society. +If here and there some degenerate individual would rather sell her sex +than do her share of honest labor in a free and just world, such an +individual would become a patient in the psychopathic ward of a public +hospital. Economic forces drive women to prostitution, first, by direct +starvation, and second, by teaching them money standards of prestige, +the ideal of living without working, which is the heaven achieved by the +rich and longed for by the poor. Contributory to the process are +policemen, politicians, and judges who protect the property of the rich, +and prey upon the disinherited; also newspaper editors, college +professors, priests of God and preachers<a name="vol_ii_page_042" id="vol_ii_page_042"></a> of Jesus, who attribute the +social evil to "original sin," or the "weakness of human nature."</p> + +<p>So far as men are concerned, economic forces operate by three main +channels; late marriage, loveless marriage, and drudgery in wives. You +will find patronizing and maintaining the brothels the following kinds +of males; first, young boys who have been taught that it is "manly" to +gratify their sex impulses; second, young men who take it for granted +that they cannot afford to marry; third, old bachelors who have looked +at marriage and decided that it is not a paying proposition; fourth, +married men who have been picked out for their money, and have come to +the conclusion that "good women" are necessarily sexless; and finally, +married men whose wives have lost the power to charm them by continuous +childbearing, and the physical and nervous strain of domestic slavery.</p> + +<p>This latter applies not merely to the wives of the poor. It applies to +members of the middle classes, and even of the richer classes, because +the job of managing many servants is often as trying as the doing of +one's own work. To explain how domestic drudgery is caused by economic +pressure would require a little essay in itself. The home is the place +where the man keeps his sex property apart under lock and key, and it +is, therefore, the portion of our civilization least influenced by +modern ideas. Women still drudge in separate kitchens and nurseries, as +they have drudged for thousands of years. They cook their dinners over +separate fires, and have each their own little group of children, +generally ill cared for, because the work is done by an untrained +amateur. Moreover, the prestige of this home has to be kept up, because +the social position and future prosperity of the man depend upon it. The +children must be dressed in frilled and starched clothing, which makes +them miserable, and wears out the tempers and pocketbooks of the +mothers. Costly entertainments must be given, and twice a day a meal +must be prepared for the father of the family—all good wives have +learned the ancient formula for the retention of masculine affections: +"Feed the brute!" Living in a world of pecuniary prestige, every +particle of the woman's surplus energy must go into some form of +ostentation, into buying or making things which are futile and +meaningless. In such a blind world, dazed by such a struggle, women +become irritable, they lose their sex<a name="vol_ii_page_043" id="vol_ii_page_043"></a> charm, they forget all about +love; so the husband gives up hoping for the impossible, accepts the +common idea that love and marriage are incompatible, and adopts the +formula that what his wife doesn't know will not hurt her.</p> + +<p>And step by step, as economic evolution progresses, as vested wealth +becomes more firmly established and claims for itself a larger and +larger share of the total product of society—so step by step you find +the pecuniary ideals becoming more firmly established, you find marriage +becoming more and more a matter of property, and less and less a matter +of love. In European countries there may still be some love marriages +among the poor, but in the upper classes there is no longer any pretense +of such a thing, and if you spoke of it you would be considered absurd. +In countries of fresh and naive commercialism, like America, the women +select the men because of their money prestige; but in Germany, the +process has gone a step further—the men are so firmly established in +their class positions that they insist upon being bought with a fortune. +The same is true when titled foreigners condescend to visit our "land of +the dollar." They will stoop to a vulgar American wife only in case her +parents will make a direct settlement of a fortune upon the husband, and +then they take her back home, and find their escape from boredom in the +highly cultivated mistresses of their own land.</p> + +<p>Everywhere on the Continent, and in Great Britain also, it is accepted +that marriages are matters of business, and only incidentally and very +slightly of affection. The initiative is commonly taken, not by the +young people, but by the heads of the families. Preliminary protocols +are exchanged, and then the family solicitors sit down and bargain over +the matter. If they were making a deal for a carload of hams, they would +be governed by the market price of hams at the moment, also by the +reputation of that particular brand of ham; and similarly, in the case +of marriage, they are governed by the prestige of the family names, and +the market price of husbands prevailing. Always the man exacts a cash +settlement, and in Catholic countries he becomes the outright owner of +all the property of his wife, thus reducing her completely to the status +of a chattel. If any young couple dares to break through these laws of +their class, the whole class unites to trample them down. One of the +greatest of English novelists, George Meredith, wrote his greatest +novel, "The Ordeal<a name="vol_ii_page_044" id="vol_ii_page_044"></a> of Richard Feverel," to show how, under the most +favorable circumstances, the union of a ruling class youth with a +farmer's daughter could result in nothing but shipwreck.</p> + +<p>The country in which the property marriage is most firmly established is +probably France; and in France the rights of nature are recognized in a +kind of supplementary union, which constitutes what is known as the +"domestic triangle," or in the French language, "<i>la vie trois</i>." The +young girl of the French ruling classes is guarded every moment of her +life like a prisoner in jail. She is sold in marriage, and is expected +to bear her husband an heir, possibly two or three children. After that, +she is considered, not under the law or by the church, but by the +general common sense of the community, to be free to seek satisfaction +of her love needs. Her husband has mistresses, and she has a lover, and +to that lover she is faithful, and in her dealings with him she is +guided by an elaborate and subtle code. Practically all French fiction +and drama deal with this "life in threes," and the complications and +tragedies which result from it. I name one novel, simply because it +happens to be the last that I myself have read, "The Red Lily," by +Anatole France.</p> + +<p>Of course, every human being knows in his heart that this is a monstrous +arrangement, and there are periods of revolt when real feeling surges up +in the hearts of men, and we have stories of true love, young and +unselfish love, such for example as Goethe's "Hermann and Dorothea," or +St. Pierre's "Paul and Virginia," or Halévy's "L'Abbe Constantin." +Everybody reads these stories and weeps over them, but everybody knows +that they are like the romantic shepherds and shepherdesses of the +ancient régime; they never had any existence in reality, and are not +meant to be taken seriously. If anybody attempts to carry them into +action, or to preach them seriously to the young, then we know that we +are dealing with a disturber of the foundations of the social order, a +dangerous and incendiary villain, and we give him a name which sends a +shudder down the spine of every friend of law and order—we call him a +"free-lover."</p> + +<p>I see before my eyes the wretch cowering upon the witness stand, and the +virtuous district attorney, who has perhaps spent the previous night in +a brothel, pointing a finger of accusing wrath into his face, and +thundering, "Do you believe in free love?" The wretch, if he is wise, +will not hesitate<a name="vol_ii_page_045" id="vol_ii_page_045"></a> or parley; he will not ask what the district attorney +means by love, or what he means by freedom. Here in very truth is a case +where "he who hesitates is lost!" Let the wretch instantly answer, No, +he does not believe in free love, he believes in love that pays cash as +it goes; he believes in love that investigates carefully the prevailing +market conditions, decides upon a reasonable price, has the contract in +writing, and lives up to the bargain—"till death do us part." If the +witness be a woman, let the answer be that she believes in slave love; +that she expects to be sold for the benefit of her parents, the prestige +of her family and the social position of her future offspring. Let her +say that she will be a loyal and devoted servant, and will never do +anything at any time to invalidate the contract which is signed for her +by her parents or guardians.<a name="vol_ii_page_046" id="vol_ii_page_046"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXVI" id="CHAPTER_XXXVI"></a>CHAPTER XXXVI<br /><br /> +LOVE VERSUS LUST</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the sex impulse, its use and misuse; when it should be +followed and when repressed.)</p></div> + +<p>We have considered the sex disorders of our age and their causes. We +have now to grope our way towards a basis of sanity and health in these +vital matters.</p> + +<p>Consider man, as Metchnikoff describes him, with his overplus of sex +energy. From early youth he is besieged by impulses and desires, and as +a rule is left entirely uninstructed on the subject, having to pick up +his ideas from the conversation of older lads, who have nothing but +misinformation and perversions to give him. Nearly all these older lads +declare and believe that it is necessary to gratify the sex impulse, +that physically it is harmful not to do so. I have even heard physicians +and trainers maintain that idea. Opposed to them are the official +moralists and preachers of religion, who declare that to follow the sex +impulse, except when officially sanctioned by the church, is to commit +sin.</p> + +<p>At different times in my life I have talked with all kinds of people, +young and old, men and women, doctors and clergymen, teachers and +trainers of athletes, and a few wise and loving mothers who have talked +with their own boys and other boys. As a result I have come to agree +with neither side in the debate. I believe that there is a distinction +which must be drawn, and I ask you to consider it carefully, and bear it +in mind in all that I say on the problem of happiness and health in sex.</p> + +<p>I believe that a normal man is one being, manifesting himself in various +aspects, physical, emotional, intellectual. I believe that all these +aspects of human activity go normally together, and cannot normally be +separated, and that the separation of them is a perversion and source of +harm. I believe that the sex impulse, as it normally manifests itself, +and would manifest itself in a man if he were living a normal life, is +an impulse which includes every aspect of the man's being. It is not +merely physical desire and emotional excitement;<a name="vol_ii_page_047" id="vol_ii_page_047"></a> it is intellectual +curiosity, a deep and intense interest, not merely in the body, but in +the mind and heart and personality of the woman.</p> + +<p>I appreciate that there is opportunity for controversy here. As a matter +of psychology, it is not easy to separate instinct from experience, to +state whether a certain impulse is innate or acquired. Some may argue +that savages know nothing about idealism in sex, neither do those modern +savages whom we breed in city slums; some may make the same assertion +concerning a great mass of loutish and sensual youths. We have got so +far from health and soundness that it is hard to be sure what is +"normal" and what is "ideal." But without going into metaphysics, I +think we can reasonably make the following statement concerning the sex +impulse at its first appearance in the average healthy youth in +civilized societies; that this impulse, going to the roots of the being, +affecting every atom of energy and every faculty, is accompanied, not +merely by happiness, but by sympathetic delight in the happiness of the +woman, by interest in the woman, by desire to be with her, to stay with +her and share her life and protect her from harm. In what I have to say +about the subject from now on, I shall describe this condition of being +and feeling by the word "love."</p> + +<p>But now suppose that men should, for some reason or other, evolve a set +of religious ideas which denied love, and repudiated love, and called it +a sin and a humiliation; or suppose there should be an economic +condition which made love a peril, so that the young couple which +yielded to love would be in danger of starvation, or of seeing their +children starve. Suppose there should be evolved classes of men and +women, held by society in a condition of permanent semi-starvation; +then, under such conditions, the impulse to love would become a trap and +a source of terror. Then the energies of a great many men would be +devoted to suppressing love and strangling it in themselves; then the +intellectual and spiritual sanctions of love would be withdrawn, the +beauty and charm and joy would go out of it, and it would become a +starving beggar at the gates, or a thief skulking in the night-time, or +an assassin with a dagger and club. In other words, sex would become all +the horror that it is today, in the form of purchased vice, and more +highly purchased marriage, and secret shame, and obscure innuendo. So we +should<a name="vol_ii_page_048" id="vol_ii_page_048"></a> have what is, in a civilized man, a perversion, the possibility +of love which is physical alone; a purely animal thing in a being who is +not purely animal, but is body, mind and spirit all together. So it +would be possible for pitiful, unhappy man, driven by the blind urge of +nature, to conceive of desiring a woman only in the body, and with no +care about what she felt, or what she thought, or what became of her +afterwards.</p> + +<p>That purely physical sex desire I will indicate in our future +discussions by the only convenient word that I can find, which is lust. +The word has religious implications, so I explain that I use it in my +own meaning, as above. There is a great deal of what the churches call +lust, which I call true and honest love; on the other hand, in Christian +churches today, there are celebrated innumerable marriages between +innocent young girls and mature men of property, which I describe as +legalized and consecrated lust.</p> + +<p>We are now in position to make a fundamental distinction. I assert the +proposition that there does not exist, in any man, at any time of his +life, or in any condition of his health, a necessity for yielding to the +impulses of lust; and I say that no man can yield to them without +degrading his nature and injuring himself, not merely morally, but +mentally, and in the long run physically. I assert that it is the duty +of every man, at all times and under all circumstances, to resist the +impulses of lust, to suppress and destroy them in his nature, by +whatever expenditure of will power and moral effort may be required.</p> + +<p>I know physicians who maintain the unpopular thesis that serious damage +may be done to the physical organism of both man and woman by the long +continued suppression of the sex-life. Let me make plain that I am not +disagreeing with such men. I do not deny that repression of the sex-life +may do harm. What I do deny is that it does any harm to repress a +physical desire which is unaccompanied by the higher elements of sex; +that is to say, by affection, admiration, and unselfish concern for the +sex-partner and her welfare. When I advise a man to resist and suppress +and destroy the impulse toward lust in his nature, I am not telling him +to live a sexless life. I am telling him that if he represses lust, then +love will come; whereas, if he yields to lust, then love may never come, +he may make himself incapable of love,<a name="vol_ii_page_049" id="vol_ii_page_049"></a> incapable of feeling it or of +trusting it, or of inspiring it in a woman. And I say that if, on the +other hand, he resists lust, he will pour all the energies of his being +into the channels of affection and idealism. Instead of having his +thoughts diverted by every passing female form, his energies will become +concentrated upon the search for one woman who appeals to him in +permanent and useful ways. We may be sure that nature has not made men +and women incompatible, but on the contrary, has provided for +fulfillment of the desires of both. The man will find some woman who is +looking for the thing which he has to offer—that is, love.</p> + +<p>And now, what about the suppression of love? Here I am willing to go as +far as any physician could desire, and possibly farther. Speaking +generally, and concerning normal adult human beings, I say that the +suppression of love is a crime against nature and life. I say that long +continued and systematic suppression of love exercises a devastating +effect, not merely upon the body, but upon the mind and all the energies +of the being. I say that the doctrine of the suppression of love, no +matter by whom it is preached, is an affront to nature and to life, and +an insult to the creator of life. I say that it is the duty of all men +and women, not merely to assert their own right to love, but to devote +their energies to a war upon whatever ideas and conventions and laws in +society deny the love-right.</p> + +<p>The belief that long continued suppression of love does grave harm has +been strongly reinforced in the last few years by the discovery of +psycho-analysis, a science which enables us to explore our unconscious +minds, and lay bare the secrets of nature's psychic workshop. These +revelations have made plain that sex plays an even more important part +in our mental lives than we realized. Sex feeling manifests itself, not +merely in grown people, but in the tiniest infants; in these latter it +has of course no object in the opposite sex, but the physical sensations +are there, and some of their outward manifestations; and as the infant +grows, and realizes the outside world, the feelings come to center upon +others, the parents first of all. These manifestations must be guided, +and sometimes repressed; but if this is done violently, by means of +terror, the consequences may be very harmful—the wrong impulses or the +terrors may survive as a "complex" in the unconscious mind, and cause a +long chain of nervous disorders<a name="vol_ii_page_050" id="vol_ii_page_050"></a> and physical weaknesses in the adult. +These things are no matter of guesswork, they have been proven as +thoroughly as any scientific discovery, and are used in a new technic of +healing. Of course, as with every new theory, there are unbalanced +people who carry it to extremes. There are fanatics of Freudianism who +talk as if everything in the human unconsciousness were sex; but that +need not blind us to the importance of these new discoveries, and the +confirmation they bring to the thesis that sane and normal love, wisely +guided by common sense and reasoned knowledge, is at a certain period of +life a vital necessity to every sound human being.<a name="vol_ii_page_051" id="vol_ii_page_051"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXVII" id="CHAPTER_XXXVII"></a>CHAPTER XXXVII<br /><br /> +CELIBACY VERSUS CHASTITY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(The ideal of the repression of the sex impulse, as against the +ideal of its guidance and cultivation.)</p></div> + +<p>There are two words which we need in this discussion, and as they are +generally used loosely, they must now be defined precisely. The two +words are celibacy and chastity. We define celibacy as the permanent and +systematic suppression of love. We define chastity, on the other hand, +as the permanent and systematic suppression of lust. Chastity, as the +word is here used, is not a denial of love, but a preparing for it; it +is the practice and the ideal, necessary especially in the young, of +consecrating their beings to the search for love, and to becoming worthy +for love. In that sense we regard chastity as one of the most essential +of virtues in the young. It is widely taught today, but ineffectively, +because unintelligently and without discrimination; because, in other +words, it is confused with celibacy, which is a perversion of life, and +one of humanity's intellectual and moral diseases.</p> + +<p>The origin of the ideal of celibacy is easy to understand. At a certain +stage in human development the eyes of the mind are opened, and to some +man comes a revelation of the life of altruism and sympathetic +imagination. To use the common phrase, the man discovers his spiritual +nature. But under the conditions then prevailing, all the world outside +him is in a conspiracy to strangle that nature, to drag it down and +trample it into the mire. One of the most powerful of these destructive +agencies, as it seems to the man, is sex. By means of sex he is laid +hold upon by strange and terrible creatures who do not understand his +higher vision, but seek only to prey upon him, and use him for their +convenience. At the worst they rob him of everything, money, health, +time and reputation; at best, they saddle him and bridle him, they put +him in harness and set him to dragging a heavy load. In the words of a +wise old man of the world, Francis Bacon, "He who marries and has +children gives hostages to fortune." In a world wherein war, pestilence, +and famine held sway,<a name="vol_ii_page_052" id="vol_ii_page_052"></a> the man of family had but slight chance of +surviving as a philosopher or prophet or saint. Discovering in himself a +deep-rooted and overwhelming impulse to fall into this snare, he +imagined a devil working in his heart; so he fled away to the desert, +and hid in a cave, and starved himself, and lashed himself with whips, +and allowed worms and lice to devour his body, in the effort to destroy +in himself the impulse of sex.</p> + +<p>So the world had monasteries, and a religious culture, not of much use, +but better than nothing; and so we still have in the world celibate +priesthoods, and what is more dangerous to our social health, we have +the old, degraded notions of the essential vileness of the sex +relationship—notions permeating all our thought, our literature, our +social conventions and laws, making it impossible for us to attain true +wisdom and health and happiness in love.</p> + +<p>I say the ideal of celibacy is an intellectual and moral disease; it is +a violation of nature, and nature devotes all her energies to breaking +it down, and she always succeeds. There never has been a celibate +religious order, no matter how noble its origin and how strict its +discipline, which has not sooner or later become a breeding place of +loathsome unnatural vices. And sooner or later the ideal begins to +weaken, and common sense to take its place, and so we read in history +about popes who had sons, and we see about us priests who have "nieces" +and attractive servant girls. Make the acquaintance of any police +sergeant in any big city of America, and get him to chatting on friendly +terms, and you will discover that it is a common experience for the +police in their raids upon brothels to catch the representatives of +celibate religious orders. As one old-timer in the "Tenderloin" of New +York said to me, "Of course, we don't make any trouble for the good +fathers." Nor was this merely because the old sergeant was an Irishman +and a Catholic; it was because deep down in his heart he knew, as every +man knows, that the craving of a man for the society and companionship +of a woman is an overwhelming craving, which will break down every +barrier that society may set against it.</p> + +<p>There is another form of celibacy which is not based upon religious +ideas, but is economic in its origin, and purely selfish in its nature. +It is unorganized and unreasoned, and is known as "bachelorhood"; it has +as its complements the<a name="vol_ii_page_053" id="vol_ii_page_053"></a> institutions of old maidenhood and of +prostitution. Both forms of celibacy, the religious and the economic, +are entirely incompatible with chastity, which is only possible where +love is recognized and honored. Chastity is a preparation for love; and +if you forbid love, whether by law, or by social convention, or by +economic strangling, you at once make chastity a Utopian dream. You may +preach it from your pulpits until you are black in the face; you may +call out your Billy Sundays to rave, and dance, and go into convulsions; +you may threaten hell-fire and brimstone until you throw whole audiences +into spasms—but you will never make them chaste. On the contrary, +strange and horrible as it may seem, those very excitements will turn +into sexual excitements before your eyes! So subtle is our ancient +mother nature, and so determined to have her own way!</p> + +<p>The abominable old ideal of celibacy, with its hatred of womanhood, its +distrust of happiness, its terror of devils, is not yet dead in the +world. It is in our very bones, and is forever appearing in new and +supposed to be modern forms. Take a man like Tolstoi, who gained +enormous influence, not merely in Russia, but throughout the world among +people who think themselves liberal—humanitarians, pacifists, +philosophic anarchists. Tolstoi's notions about sex, his teachings and +writings and likewise his behavior toward it, were one continuous +manifestation of disease. All through his youth and middle years, as an +army officer, popular novelist, and darling of the aristocracy, his life +was one of license, and the attitude toward women he thus acquired, he +never got out of his thoughts to his last day. Gorky, meeting him in his +old age, reports his conversation as unpleasantly obscene, and his whole +attitude toward women one of furtive and unwholesome slyness.</p> + +<p>But Tolstoi was in other ways a great soul, one of the great moral +consciences of humanity. He looked about him at a world gone mad with +greed and hate, and he made convulsive efforts to reform his own spirit +and escape the power of evil. As regards sex, his thought took the form +of ancient Christian celibacy. Man must repudiate the physical side of +sex, he must learn to feel toward women a "pure" affection, the +relationship of brother and sister. In his novel, "Resurrection," +Tolstoi portrays a young aristocrat who meets a beautiful peasant girl +and conceives for her such a noble and<a name="vol_ii_page_054" id="vol_ii_page_054"></a> generous emotion; but gradually +the poison of physical sex-desire steals into his mind, he seduces her, +and she becomes a prostitute. Later in life, when he discovers the crime +he has committed, he humbles himself and follows her into exile, and +wins her to God and goodness by the unselfish and unsexual love which he +should have maintained from the beginning.</p> + +<p>It was Tolstoi's teaching that all men should aspire toward this kind of +love, and when it was pointed out to him that if this doctrine were to +be applied universally, the human race would become extinct, his answer +was that there was no reason to fear that, because only a few people +would be good enough and strong enough to follow the right ideal! Here +you see the reincarnation of the old Christian notion that we are +"conceived in sin and born in iniquity." We may be pure and good, and +cease to exist; or we may sin, and let life continue. Some choose to +sin, and these sinners hand down their sinful qualities to the future; +and so virtue and goodness remain what they have always been, a futile +crying out in the wilderness by a few religious prophets, whom God has +sent to call down destruction upon a world which He had made—through +some mistake never satisfactorily explained!</p> + +<p>It is easy nowadays to persuade intelligent people to laugh at such a +perverted view of life; but the truth is that this attitude toward sex +is written, not merely into our religious creeds and formulas, but into +most of our laws and social conventions. It is this, which for +convenience I will call the "monkish" view of love, which prevents our +dealing frankly and honestly with its problems, distinguishing between +what is wrong and what is right, and doing anything effective to remedy +the evils of marriage-plus-prostitution. That is why I have tried so +carefully to draw the distinction between what I call love and what I +call lust; between the ideal of celibacy, which is a perversion, and the +idea of chastity, which must form an essential part of any regimen of +true and enduring love.<a name="vol_ii_page_055" id="vol_ii_page_055"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXVIII" id="CHAPTER_XXXVIII"></a>CHAPTER XXXVIII<br /><br /> +THE DEFENSE OF LOVE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses passionate love, its sanction, its place in life, and +its preservation in marriage.)</p></div> + +<p>I have before me as I write a newspaper article by Robert Blatchford, a +great writer and great man. He is dealing with the subject of "Love and +Marriage," and his doctrine is summed up in the following sentences: +"There is a difference between loving a woman and falling in love with +her. The love one falls into is a sweet illusion. But that fragrant +dream does not last. In marriage there are no fairies."</p> + +<p>This expresses one of the commonest ideas in the world. Passionate love +is one thing, and marriage is another and different thing, and it is no +more possible to reconcile them than to mix oil and water. Our notions +of "romantic" love took their rise in the Middle Ages, from the songs +and narratives of the troubadours, and this whole tradition was based +upon the glorification of illegitimate and extra-marital love. That +tradition has ruled the world of art ever since, and rules it today. I +do not exaggerate when I say that it is the conventional view of grand +opera and the drama, of moving pictures and novels, that impassioned and +thrilling love is found before marriage, and is found in adultery and in +temptations to adultery, but is never found in marriage. I have a pretty +varied acquaintance with the literature of the world, and I have sat and +thought for quite a while, without being able to recall a single +portrait of life which contradicts this thesis; and certainly anyone +familiar with literature could name ten thousand novels and dramas and +grand operas which support the thesis.</p> + +<p>English and American Puritanism have beaten the tradition down to this +extent: the novelist portrays the glories and thrills of young love, and +carries it as far as the altar and the orange blossoms and white ribbons +and showers of rice—and stops. He leaves you to assume that this +delightful rapture continues forever after; but he does not attempt to +show it to you—he would not dare attempt to show it, because<a name="vol_ii_page_056" id="vol_ii_page_056"></a> the +general experience of men and women in marriage would make him +ridiculous. So he runs away from the issue; if he tells you a story of +married life, it is a story of a "triangle"—the thrills of love +imperiling marriage, and either crushed out, or else wrecking the lives +of the victims. Such is the unanimous testimony of all our arts today, +and I submit it as evidence of the fact that there must be something +vitally wrong with our marriage system.</p> + +<p>Personally, I am prepared to go as far as the extreme sex-radical in the +defense of love and the right to love. I believe that love is the most +precious of all the gifts of life. I accept its sanctions and its +authority. I believe that it is to be cherished and obeyed, and not to +be run away from or strangled in the heart. I believe that it is the +voice of nature speaking in the depths of us, and speaking from a wisdom +deeper than we have yet attained, or may attain for many centuries to +come. And when I say love, I do not mean merely affection. I do not mean +merely the habit of living in the same home, which is the basis of +marriage as Blatchford describes it. What I mean is the love of the +poets and the dreamers, the "young love" which is thrill and ecstasy, a +glorification and a transfiguration of the whole of life. I say that, +far from giving up this love for marriage, it is the true purpose of +marriage to preserve this love and perpetuate it.</p> + +<p>To save repetition and waste of words, let us agree that from now on +when I use the word love, I mean the passionate love of those who are +"in love." I believe that it is the right of men and women to be "in +love," and that there is no true marriage unless they are "in love," and +stay "in love." I believe that it is possible to apply reason to love, +to learn to understand love and the ways of love, to protect it and keep +it alive in marriage. Blatchford writes the sentence, "Matrimony cannot +be all honeymoon." I answer that assuredly it can be, and if you ask me +how I know, I tell you that I know in the only way we really know +anything—because I have proven it in my own life. I say that if men and +women would recognize the perpetuation of the honeymoon as the purpose +of marriage, and would devote to that end one-hundredth part of the +intelligence and energy they now devote to the killing of their fellow +human beings in war, we might have an end to the wretched "romantic +tradition" which makes the most sacred emotion of the human<a name="vol_ii_page_057" id="vol_ii_page_057"></a> heart into +a sneak-thief skulking in the darkness, entering our lives by back +alleys and secret stairways—while greed and worldly pomp, dullness and +boredom, parade in by the front entrance.</p> + +<p>In the first place, what is love—young love, passionate love, the love +of those who "fall in"? I know a certain lady, well versed in worldly +affairs, who says that it is at once the greatest nonsense and the +deadliest snare in the world. This lady was trained as a "coquette"; +she, and all the young ladies she knew, made it their business to cause +men to fall in love with them, and their prestige was based upon their +skill in that art. So to them "love" was a joke, and men "in love" were +victims, whether ridiculous or pitiable. To this I answer that I know +nothing in life that cannot be "faked"; but an imitation has value only +as it resembles something that is real, and that has real value.</p> + +<p>I am aware that it is possible for a society to be so corrupted, so +given up to the admiration of imitations, of the paint and powder and +silk-stocking-clad-ankle kind of love, that true and genuine love +interest, with its impulse to self-sacrifice and self-consecration, is +no longer felt or understood. I am aware that in such a society it is +possible for even the very young to be so sophisticated that what they +take to be love is merely vanity, the worship of money, and the grace +and charm which the possession of money confers. I have known girls who +were "head over heels" in love, and thought it was with a man, when +quite clearly they were in love with a dress suit or a social position. +In such a society it is hard to talk about natural emotions, and deep +and abiding and disinterested affections.</p> + +<p>Nevertheless, amid all the false conventions, the sham glories and +cowardices of our civilization, there abides in the heart the craving +for true love, and the idea of it leaps continually into flame in the +young. In spite of the ridicule of the elders, in spite of blunders and +tragic failures, in spite of dishonesties and deceptions—nevertheless, +it continues to happen that out of a thousand maidens the youth finds +one whose presence thrills him with a new and terrible emotion, whose +lightest touch makes him shiver, almost makes his knees give way.</p> + +<p>If you will recall what I have written about instinct and reason, you +will know that I am not a blind worshipper of<a name="vol_ii_page_058" id="vol_ii_page_058"></a> our ancient mother +nature. I am not humble in my attitude toward her, but perfectly willing +to say when I know more than she does. On the other hand, when I know +nothing or next to nothing, I am shy of contradicting my ancient mother, +and disposed to give respectful heed to her promptings. One of the +things about which we know almost nothing at present is the subject of +eugenics. We are only at the beginning of trying to find out what +matings produce the best offspring. Meantime, we ought to consider those +indications which nature gives us, just as we consider her advice about +what food to eat and what rest to take.</p> + +<p>It is not my idea that science will ever take men and women and marry +them in cold blood, as today we breed our cattle. What I think will +happen is that young men and women will meet one another, as they do at +present, and will find the love impulse awakening; they will then submit +their love to investigation, as to whether they should follow that +impulse, or should wait. In other words, I do not believe that science +will ever do away with the raptures of love, but will make itself the +servant of these raptures, finding out what they mean, and how their +precious essence may be preserved.</p> + +<p>I perfectly understand that the begetting of children is not the only +purpose of love. The children have to be reared and trained, which means +that a home has to be founded, and the parents have to learn to +co-operate. They have to have common aims in life, and temperaments +sufficiently harmonious so that they can live in the house together +without tearing each other's eyes out. This means that in any civilized +society all impulses of love have to be subjected to severe criticism. I +intend, before long, to show just how I think parents and guardians +should co-operate with young people in love; to help them to understand +in advance what they are doing, and how it may be possible for them to +make their love permanent and successful. For the moment I merely state, +to avoid any possible misunderstanding, that I am the last person in the +world to favor what is called "blind" love, the unthinking abandonment +to an impulse of sex passion. What I am trying to show is that the +passionate impulse, the passionate excitement of the young couple, is +the material out of which love and marriage are made. Passion is a part +of us, and a fundamental part. If we do not find a place for it<a name="vol_ii_page_059" id="vol_ii_page_059"></a> in +marriage, it will seek satisfaction outside of marriage, and that means +lying, or the wrecking of the marriage, or both.</p> + +<p>Passion is what gives to love and marriage its vitality, its energy, its +drive; in fact, it gives these qualities to the whole character. It is a +vivifying force, transfiguring the personality, and if it is crushed and +repressed, the whole life of that person is distorted. Yet it is a fact +which every physician knows, that millions of women marry and live their +whole lives without ever knowing what passionate gratification is. As a +consequence of this, millions of men take it for granted that there are +"good" women and "bad" women, and that only the latter are interesting. +This, of course, is simply one of the abnormalities caused by the +supplanting of love by money as a motive in marriage. Love becomes a +superfluity and a danger, and all the forces of society, including +institutionalized religion, combine to outlaw it and drive it +underground. Or we might say that they lock it in a dungeon—and that +the supreme delight of all the painters, poets, musicians, dramatists +and novelists of all climes and all periods of history, is to portray +the escape of the "young god" from these imprisonments. The story is +told in six words of an old English ballad: "Love will find out the +way!"</p> + +<p>Is it not obvious that there must be something vitally wrong with our +institutions and conventions in matters of sex, when here exists this +eternal war between our moralists and our artists? Why not make up our +minds what we really believe; whether it is true that poets are, as +Shelley said, "the unacknowledged legislators of mankind," or whether +they are, as Plato declared, false teachers and seducers of the young. +If they are the latter, let us have done with them, let us drive them +from the state, together with lovers and all other impassioned persons. +But if, on the other hand, it is truth the poets tell about life, then +let us take the young god out of his dungeon, and bring him into our +homes by the front door, and cast out the false gods of vanity and greed +and worldly prestige which now sit in his place.<a name="vol_ii_page_060" id="vol_ii_page_060"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXIX" id="CHAPTER_XXXIX"></a>CHAPTER XXXIX<br /><br /> +BIRTH CONTROL</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Deals with the prevention of conception as one of the greatest of +man's discoveries, releasing him from nature's enslavement, and +placing the keys of life in his hands.)</p></div> + +<p>I assume that you have followed my argument, and are prepared to +consider seriously whether it may be possible to establish love in +marriage as the sex institution of civilized society. If you really wish +to bring such an institution into existence, the first thing you have to +do is to accomplish the social revolution; that is, you must wipe out +class control of society, and prestige based upon money exploitation. +But that is a vast change, and will take time, and meanwhile we have to +live, and wish to live with as little misery as possible. So the +practical question becomes this: Suppose that you, as an individual, +wish to find as much happiness in love as may now be possible, what +counsel have I to offer? If you are young, you wish this advice for +yourself; while if you are mature, you wish it for your children. I will +put my advice under four heads: First, marriage for love; second, birth +control; third, early marriage; fourth, education for marriage.</p> + +<p>The first of these we have considered at some length. A part of the +process of social revolution is personal conversion; the giving up by +every individual of the worldly ideal, the surrender of luxury and +self-indulgence, the consecrating of one's life to self education and +the cause of social justice. And do not think that that is an easy +thing, or an unimportant thing, a thing to be taken for granted. On the +contrary, it is something that most of us have to struggle with at every +hour of our lives, because respect for property and worldly conventions +has become one of our deepest instincts; our whole society is poisoned +with it, and I can count on the fingers of one hand the people I have +known in my life who have completely escaped from it. It is not merely a +question of refusing to marry except for love, it is a question of +refusing to love except for honest and worthy qualities. It is a +question of saving our children from the damnable forces of<a name="vol_ii_page_061" id="vol_ii_page_061"></a> snobbery, +which lay siege to their young minds and destroy the best impulses of +their hearts, while we in our blindness are still thinking of them as +babies.</p> + +<p>Of the other three topics that I have suggested, I begin with birth +control, because it is the most fundamental and most important. Without +birth control there can be no freedom, no happiness, no permanence in +love, and there can be no mastery of life. Birth control is one of the +great fundamental achievements of the human reason, as important to the +life of mankind as the discovery of fire or the invention of printing. +Birth control is the deliverance of womankind, and therefore of mankind +also, from the blind and insane fecundity of nature, which created us +animals, and would keep us animals forever if we did not rebel.</p> + +<p>Ever since the dawn of history, and probably for long ages before that, +our race has been struggling against this blind insanity of nature. +Poor, bewildered Theodore Roosevelt stormed at what he called "race +suicide," thinking it was some brand new and terrible modern corruption; +but nowhere do we find a primitive tribe, nowhere in history do we find +a race which did not seek to save itself from overgrowth and consequent +starvation. They did not know enough to prevent conception, but they did +the best they could by means of abortion and infanticide. And because +today superstition keeps the priceless knowledge of contraception from +the vast majority of women, these crude, savage methods still prevail, +and we have our million abortions a year in the United States. Assuming +that something near one-fourth our population consists of women capable +of bearing children, we have one woman in twenty-five going through this +agonizing and health-wrecking experience every year. They go through +with it, you understand, regardless of everything—all the moralists and +preachers and priests with their hell fire and brimstone. They go +through with it because we have both marriage without love, and love +without marriage; also because we permit some ten or twenty per cent of +our total population to suffer the pangs of perpetual starvation, +because more than half our farms are mortgaged or occupied by tenants, +and some ten or twenty per cent of our workers are out of jobs all the +time.</p> + +<p>Some of our women know about birth control. They are the rich women, who +get what they want in this world. They object to the humiliations and +inconveniences of child bearing,<a name="vol_ii_page_062" id="vol_ii_page_062"></a> and some of them raise one or two +children, and others of them raise poodle dogs. Also, our middle classes +have found out; our doctors and lawyers and college professors, and +people of that sort. But we deliberately keep the knowledge from our +foreign populations, by the terrors which the church has at its command. +And what is the practical consequence of this procedure? It is that +while all our Anglo-Saxon stock, those who founded our country and +established its institutions, are gradually removing themselves from the +face of the earth, our ignorant and helpless populations, whether in +city slums or on tenant farms, are multiplying like rabbits. Read Jack +London's "The Valley of the Moon" and see what is happening in +California. You will find the same thing happening in any portion of the +United States where you take the trouble to use your own eyes.</p> + +<p>Now, I try to repress such impulses toward race prejudice as I find in +myself. I am willing to admit for the sake of this argument that in the +course of time all the races that are now swarming in America, +Portuguese and Japanese and Mexican and French-Canadian and Polish and +Hungarian and Slovakian, are capable of just as high intellectual +development as our ancestors who wrote the Declaration of Independence. +But no one who sees the conditions under which they now live can deny +that it will take a good deal of labor, teaching them and training them, +as well as scrubbing them, to accomplish that result. And what a waste +of energy, what a farce it makes of culture, to take the people who have +already been scrubbed and taught and trained for self-government, and +exterminate them, and raise up others in their place! It seems time that +we gave thought to the fundamental question, whether or not there is +something self-destroying in the very process of culture. Unless we can +answer this we might as well give up our visions and our efforts to lift +the race.</p> + +<p>Theodore Roosevelt stormed at birth control for something like ten +years, and it would be interesting if we could know how many Anglo-Saxon +babies he succeeded in bringing into the world by his preachments. If +what he wanted was to correct the balance between native and foreign +births, how much more sensible to have taught birth control to those +poor, pathetic, half-starved and overworked foreign mothers of our slums +and tenant farms! I can wager that for every Anglo-Saxon baby that +Theodore Roosevelt brought into the world<a name="vol_ii_page_063" id="vol_ii_page_063"></a> by his preachings, he could +have kept out ten thousand foreign slum babies, if only he had lent his +aid to Margaret Sanger!</p> + +<p>Ah, but he wanted all the babies to be born, you say! I see before me +the face of a certain devout old Christian lady, known to me, who +settles the question by the Bible quotation, "Be fruitful and multiply." +But what avails it to follow this biblical advice, if we allow one out +of five of the new-born infants to perish from lack of scientific care +before they are two years old? What avails it if we send them to school +hungry, as we do twenty-two per cent of the public school children of +New York City? What avails it if we allow venereal disease to spread, so +that a large percentage of the babies are deformed and miserable? What +avails it if, when they are fully grown, we can think of nothing better +to do with them than to take them by millions at a time and dress them +up in uniforms and send them out to be destroyed by poison gases? Would +it not be the part of common sense to establish universal birth control +for at least a year or two—until we have learned to take care of our +newly born babies, and to feed our school children, and to protect our +youths from vice, and to abolish poverty and war from the earth?</p> + +<p>These are the social aspects of birth control. There are also to be +considered what I might call the personal aspects of it. Because young +people do not know about it, and have no way to find out about it, they +dare not marry, and so the amount of vice in the world is increased. +Because married women do not know about it, love is turned to terror, +and marital happiness is wrecked. Because the harmless and proper +methods are not sensibly taught, people use harmful methods, which cause +nervous disorders, and wreck marital happiness, and break up homes. +Thorough and sound knowledge about birth control is just as essential to +happiness in marriage as knowledge of diet is necessary to health, or as +knowledge of economics is necessary to intelligent action as a voter and +citizen. The suppression by law of knowledge of birth control is just as +grave a crime against human life as ever was committed by religious +bigotry in the blackest days of the Spanish Inquisition.</p> + +<p>Now this law stands on the statute books of our country, and if I should +so much as hint to you in this book what you need to know, or even where +you can find out about it, I should be liable to five years in jail and +a fine of $5,000, and<a name="vol_ii_page_064" id="vol_ii_page_064"></a> every person who mailed a copy of this book, or +any advertisement of this book, would be in the same plight. But there +is not yet a law to prohibit agitation against the law, so the first +thing I say to every reader of this book is that they should obtain a +copy of the <i>Birth Control Review</i>, published at 104 Fifth Avenue, New +York, and also should join the Voluntary Parenthood League, 206 +Broadway, New York. Get the literature of these organizations and +circulate them and help spread the light!</p> + +<p>As to the knowledge which you need, the only advice I am allowed to give +is that you should seek it. Seek it, and persist in seeking, until you +find it. Ask everyone you know; and ask particularly among enlightened +people, those who are willing to face the facts of human life and trust +in reason and common sense. I do not know if I am violating the law in +thus telling you how to find out about birth control. One of the +charming features of this law, and others against the spreading of +knowledge, is that they will never tell you in advance what you may say, +but leave you to say it and take your chances! I believe that I am not +violating any law when I tell you that there are half a dozen simple, +inexpensive, and entirely harmless methods of preventing undesired +parenthood without the destruction of the marital relationship.</p> + +<p>I am one of those who for many years believed that the destruction of +the marital relationship was the only proper and moral method. I was +brought up to take the monkish view of love. I thought it was an animal +thing which required some outside justification. I had been taught +nothing else; but now I have had personal experience of other +justifications of love, and I believe that love is a beautiful and +joyful relationship, which not merely requires no other justification, +but confers justification upon many other things in life.</p> + +<p>I used to believe in that old ideal of celibacy, thinking it a fine +spiritual exercise. But since then I have looked out on life, and have +found so many interesting things to do, so much important work calling +for attention, that I do not have to invent any artificial exercises for +my spirit. I have looked at humanity, and brought myself to recognize +the plain common sense fact—that whatever superfluous energy I may have +to waste upon artificial spirituality, the great mass of the people have +no such energy to spare. They need all their<a name="vol_ii_page_065" id="vol_ii_page_065"></a> energies to get a living +for themselves and for their wives and little ones. They have their sex +impulses, and will follow them, and the only question is, shall they +follow them wisely or unwisely? The religious people decide that sexual +indulgence is wrong, and they impose a penalty—and what is that +penalty? A poor, unwanted little waif of a soul, which never sinned, and +had nothing to do with the matter, is brought into a hostile world, to +suffer neglect, and perhaps starvation—in order to punish parents who +did not happen to be sufficiently strong willed to practice continence +in marriage!</p> + +<p>I used to believe that there was benefit to health and increase of +power, whether physical or mental, in the celibate life. I have tried +both ways of life, and as a result I know that that old idea is +nonsense. I know now that love is a natural function. Of course, like +any other function it can be abused; just as hunger may become gluttony, +sleeping may become sluggishness, getting the money to pay one's way +through life may become ferocious avarice. But we do not on this account +refuse ever to eat or sleep or get money to pay our debts. I do not say +that I believe, I say I know, that free and happy love, guided by wisdom +and sound knowledge, is not merely conducive to health, but is in the +long run necessary to health.</p> + +<p>People who condemn birth control always argue as if one wished to teach +this knowledge indiscriminately to the young. Perhaps it is natural that +those who oppose the use of reason should assume that others are as +irrational as themselves. All I can say is that I no more believe in +teaching birth control to the young than I believe in feeding beefsteak +to nursing infants. There is a period in life for beefsteaks—or, if my +vegetarian friends prefer, for lentil hash and peanut butter sandwiches; +in exactly the same way there is a time for teaching the fundamentals of +sex, and another time for teaching the art of happiness in marriage, +which includes birth control. That brings me, by a very pleasant +transition, to the other two subjects which I have promised to discuss: +early marriage and education for marriage.<a name="vol_ii_page_066" id="vol_ii_page_066"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XL" id="CHAPTER_XL"></a>CHAPTER XL<br /><br /> +EARLY MARRIAGE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses love marriages, how they can be made, and the duty of +parents in respect to them.)</p></div> + +<p>I have shown how economic forces in our society make for later and later +marriage; and at the present time economic forces are so overwhelming +that all other forces are hardly worth mentioning in comparison. You +are, let us say, the mother of a boy of eighteen, and you have what you +call "common sense"—meaning thereby a grasp of the money facts of life. +If your darling boy of eighteen should come to you with a grave face and +announce, "Mother dear, I have met the girl I love, and we have decided +that we want to get married"—you would consider that the most absurd +thing you had ever heard in all your born days, and you would tell the +lad that he was a baby, and to run along and play. If he persisted in +his crazy notion, you and your husband and all the brothers and sisters +and relatives and friends both of the boy and the girl would set to +work, by scolding and ridiculing, to make life a misery for them, and +ninety-nine times out of a hundred you would break down the young +couple's marital intention.</p> + +<p>But now, let us try another supposition. Let us suppose that your +darling boy of eighteen should come to you again and say, "Mother dear, +some of the boys are going to spend this evening in a brothel, and I +have decided to go along." Would you think that was the most absurd +thing you had ever heard in all your born days? Or would you answer, +"Yes, of course, my boy; that is what I had in mind when I made you give +up the girl you loved"? No, you would not answer that. But here is the +vital fact—it doesn't matter what you would answer, for you would never +have a chance to answer. When a mother's darling wants to get married, +he comes and asks his mother's blessing; but never does a mother's +darling ask a blessing before he goes with the other boys to a brothel. +He just goes. Maybe he borrows the money from some other fellow, and<a name="vol_ii_page_067" id="vol_ii_page_067"></a> +next day tells you he went to a theater. Or maybe he picks up some poor +man's daughter on the street, and takes her into the park, or up on the +roof of a tenement. Some such thing he does, to find satisfaction for an +instinct which you in your worldly wisdom or your heavenly piety spurn +and ridicule.</p> + +<p>I do not wish to exaggerate. If you are an exceptionally wise and +tactful mother, you may keep the confidence of your boy, and guide him +day by day through his temptations and miseries, and keep him chaste. +But the more you try that, the more apt you will be to come to my +conclusion, that late marriage is a crime against the race; the more +aware you will be of the danger, either that his boy friends may break +him down, or that some lewd woman may come to his bedroom in the +night-time. Never will you be able to be quite sure that he is not lying +to you, because of his shame, and the pain he cannot bear to inflict +upon you. Never will you be quite sure that he is not hiding some cruel +disease, sneaking off to some quack who takes his money and leaves him +worse than before—until finally he shoots off his head, as happened to +a nephew of an old and dear friend of mine.</p> + +<p>Such is the problem of the mother of a son; and now, what about the +mother of a daughter? This seems much simpler; because your daughter is +not generally troubled with sex cravings, and if you teach her the +proprieties, and see that she is carefully chaperoned, you may +reasonably hope that she will be chaste. But some day you expect that +she will marry; and then comes your problem. If you are the usual +mother, you are looking for some one who can maintain her in the state +of life to which she is accustomed. If a fairy prince would come along, +or a plaster saint, you would be pleased; but failing that, you will +take a successful business man, one who has made his way in the world +and secured himself a position. But turn back to the figures I gave you +a while ago. If this man is thirty years of age, there is at least a +fifty-fifty chance that he has had some venereal disease; and while the +doctors claim to cure these diseases absolutely, we must bear in mind +that doctors are human, and sometimes claim more than they perform. +Every doctor will admit, if you pin him down, that these diseases burrow +deeply into the tissues, and many times are supposed to be cured when +they are only hidden.<a name="vol_ii_page_068" id="vol_ii_page_068"></a></p> + +<p>Here is, in a nutshell, the problem of the mother of a daughter. If you +marry your daughter at seventeen to a lad of her own age, you have a +very good chance of marrying her to a person who is chaste. If you marry +her to a man of twenty-five, you have perhaps one chance in a hundred. +If you marry her to a man of thirty-five, you have perhaps one chance in +ten thousand. You may not like these facts; I do not like them myself; +but I have learned that facts are none the less facts on that account.</p> + +<p>You know the average society bud of eighteen, and her attitude to a boy +of the same age. She regards him as a child; and you think, perhaps, +that it is natural for a girl to be interested in men of thirty-five and +even forty-five. But I tell you that it is not natural, it is simply one +of the perversions of pecuniary sex. The girl is interested in such men, +because all her young life she has been carefully coached for the +marriage market; because she is dressed for it, and solemnly brought +out, and introduced to other players of this exciting game of marriage +for money, with its incredible prizes of automobiles and jewels and +palaces full of servants, and magic check-books that never grow empty. +But suppose that, instead of regarding her as a prize in a lottery, you +let her grow up naturally, and taught her the truth about herself, both +body and mind; suppose that, instead of dressing her in ways +deliberately contrived to emphasize her sex, you put her in a simple +uniform, and taught her to be honest and straightforward, instead of +mincing and coy; suppose she played athletic games with boys of her own +age, and invited them to her home, not for "jazz" dancing and stuffing +cake and candy, but for the sharing of good music and literature and +art—don't you think that maybe this girl might become interested in a +lad of her own age, and choose him with some understanding of his real +self?</p> + +<p>You take it for granted that young people should not marry until they +can "afford it." But stop and consider, is not this a relic of old days? +Always it takes time, and deliberate effort of the reason, to adjust our +conventions to new facts; so face this fact—marriage today does not +necessarily mean children, it may just mean love. It involves little +more expense, because the young people need cost no more together than +they cost in the separate homes of their parents. If they are children +of the poor, they are already taking care<a name="vol_ii_page_069" id="vol_ii_page_069"></a> of themselves. If they are +children of the moderately well off, their parents expect to support +them while they are getting an education; and why can they not just as +well live together, and the parents of each contribute their share? Let +the parents of the boy give him, not merely what it costs to keep him at +home, but also the sums which otherwise the boy would pay to the +brothels. By this argument I do not mean that I favor keeping young +people financially dependent upon their parents. My own son is working +his own way through college, and I should be glad to see every young man +doing the same. All that I am saying is that if parents are going to +support their children while they are getting an education, they might +just as well support them married as single, instead of penalizing +matrimony by making all allowances cease at that point.</p> + +<p>I know a certain ardent feminist, who is all for late marriage for +women, and abhors my ideas on this subject. She wants women to get a +chance to develop their personalities; whereas I want to sacrifice them +to the frantic exigencies of the male animal! Young things of seventeen +and eighteen have no idea what they are, or what they want from life; +the mating impulse is a blind frenzy in them, and they must be taught to +control it, just as they are taught not to kill when they are angry!</p> + +<p>In the first place, I point out that young ladies in colleges and in +ballrooms give a lot of time and thought to sex, even though they do not +call it by that inelegant term. I very much question whether, if we +should apply our wisdom to the task of getting our young people happily +mated before we sent them off to college, we should not get a lot more +serious study out of them than we now do, with all their "fussing" and +flirting and dancing.</p> + +<p>Second, I am willing to make heroic moral efforts, where I see any +chance of adequate results, but I have examined the facts, and +definitely made up my mind that it is not worth while, in our present +stage of culture, to preach to the mass of men the doctrine that they +should abstain from sex experience until they are twenty-five or thirty +years of age. You may storm at them, but they only laugh at you; you may +pass laws, and try to put them in jail, but you only provide a harvest +for blackmailers and grafters. As to sacrificing the girl, my answer is +simply that I believe in love;<a name="vol_ii_page_070" id="vol_ii_page_070"></a> and in this I think the girl will agree +with me, if you will let her! I have never heard any qualified person +maintain that it hurts a girl to respond to love at the age of seventeen +or eighteen; nor do I think that it hurts a boy, provided that he is +taught the virtues of moderation and self-restraint. Without these, it +will hurt him to eat; but that is no argument for starving him. As for +the question of his maturity and power to judge, we are able at present +to keep him from marrying anybody, so I think we might reasonably hope +to keep him from marrying a wanton or a slut. Certainly we might find +somebody better than the peroxide blonde he now picks up in front of the +moving picture palace.</p> + +<p>The question, at what ages we shall advise our young couple to have +children, is a separate one, depending upon many circumstances. First, +of course, they should not have any until they are able financially to +maintain them. As to the age at which it is physically advisable, that +is a question to be settled by physicians and physiologists. I myself +had the idea that the proper age would be when the woman had attained +her full stature; but my friend Dr. William J. Robinson sends me some +statistics from the Johns Hopkins Hospital <i>Bulletin</i>, which startle me. +This publication for January, 1922, gives the results in five hundred +childbirths, in which the mother's age was from twelve to sixteen years +inclusive. It appears that pregnancy and labor at these ages are no more +dangerous than in older women; but on the other hand, the duration of +the labor is actually shorter, and the size of the children is not +inferior. These facts are so contrary to the general impression that I +content myself with calling attention to them, and leave the commenting +to be done by feminists and others who oppose themselves to the idea of +early marriage.<a name="vol_ii_page_071" id="vol_ii_page_071"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLI" id="CHAPTER_XLI"></a>CHAPTER XLI<br /><br /> +THE MARRIAGE CLUB</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses how parents and elders may help the young to avoid +unhappy marriages.)</p></div> + +<p>I will make the assumption that you would like to have a trial of my +cure for prostitution. You would like to do something right here and +now, without waiting for the social revolution. Very well: I propose +that you shall find a few other parents of boys and girls who are in +revolt against our system of hidden vice, and that you will meet and +form a modern marriage club. Only you won't call it that, of course; you +will tactfully describe it as a literary society, or a social circle, or +an Epworth League. The parents who run it will know what it is for, just +as they do today; the only difference being that it will exist to +promote love matches instead of money matches. It happens that I am +myself a tactless sort of a person, not skillful at avoiding saying what +I mean. So, in this chapter, I shall content myself with setting forth +exactly what this marriage club will do, and leaving it to more clever +people to supply the necessary camouflage.</p> + +<p>This club will begin by correcting the most stupid of all our +educational blunders, the assumption of the necessary immaturity of the +young. Our young people nowadays have ten times as much chance to learn +and ten times as much stimulus to learn as we had; and it is a generally +safe assumption that they know much more than we think they do, and are +ready to learn every sensible and interesting thing. I am carrying on an +epistolary acquaintance with a little miss of twelve, who has read half +a dozen of my books—among the "worst" of them—and writes me letters of +grave appreciation. I have talked on Socialism to a thousand school +children, and had them question me for an hour, and heard just as worth +while questions as I have heard from an audience of bankers. Never in my +life have I talked about real things with children that I did not find +them proud to be treated seriously, and eager to show that<a name="vol_ii_page_072" id="vol_ii_page_072"></a> they were +worthy of that honor. A great part of our foolishness with children is +due to the emptiness of our own heads.</p> + +<p>These parents will delegate one man and one woman to make a thorough +study of the sex education of the young. Of course, there is knowledge +about sex which has to be given to the very youngest child, and more and +more must be given as they grow older and ask more questions. But what I +have in mind here is that detailed and precise knowledge which must be +given to the young when they approach the period of puberty. At this age +of fourteen or fifteen the man will take each of the boys apart, and the +woman will take each of the girls, and will explain to them what they +need to know. This duty will not be trusted to parents, for parents have +an imbecile fear of talking straight to their children, and try to get +by with rubbish about bees and flowers. Let every child know that the +days of the hole-and-corner sex business is forever past, and that here +is an instructed person, who talks real American, and knows what he is +talking about, and will deal with facts, instead of with evasions.</p> + +<p>This club will help to educate the youngsters, and also to give them a +good time, developing both their minds and bodies, and learning to know +them thoroughly. When they are sixteen each one will have another talk, +this time about marriage and what it means; learning that it is not +merely flirtations and delicious thrills, but a business partnership, +and the deepest and best of all friendships. So when John finds that he +likes Mary best of all the girls he knows, this won't be a subject for +"kidding" and sly innuendo, and blushes and simpering on Mary's part, +but an occasion for decent and sensible talk about what each of them +really is, and what each thinks the other to be. If they think they are +in love, then there will be a council of the elder statesmen, to +consider that case, and what are the chances of happiness in that love. +This may sound forbidding, but it is exactly what is done at +present—only it is not done honestly and frankly, and therefore does +not carry proper weight with the young people.</p> + +<p>I am an opponent of long engagements, but I am also an opponent of no +engagements at all; I know no truer proverb than "Marry in haste and +repent at leisure." It would be my idea that a very young couple should +announce their<a name="vol_ii_page_073" id="vol_ii_page_073"></a> engagement, and then wait six months, and be consulted +again about the matter, and have a chance to withdraw with no hard +feelings, if either party thought best. If they wished to go on, they +might be asked to wait another six months, if their elders felt very +certain there were reasons to doubt the wisdom of the match.</p> + +<p>There are, of course, people who, because of disease or physical defect, +should never be allowed to marry; and others who might marry, but should +not be allowed to have children. There should be laws providing for such +cases, requiring physical examination before marriage, and in extreme +cases providing for a simple and harmless surgical operation to prevent +the hopelessly unfit from passing on their defects to the future. But +dealing for the moment with normal young persons, members of our modern +marriage club, I should say that if, after they have listened to the +warning of their elders, and have waited for a decent interval to think +things over, they still remain of the opinion that they can make a +successful marriage, then it is up to the elders to wish them luck. I +have known of young couples who have refused to heed warnings, and +regretted it; but I have known of others who went ahead and had their +own way and proved they were right. There is a form of wisdom called +experience and there is another form called love.</p> + +<p>I hear the worldly and cynical rail at the blindness of "young love," +and I can see the truth in what they say; but also I can see the deeper +truth in the magic dreams of the young soul. Here is a youth who adores +a girl, and you know the girl, and it is comical to you, because you +know she is not any of the things the youth imagines. But who are you +that claim to know the last thing about a human soul? Look into your +own, and see how many different things you are! Look back, if you can, +to the time when you were young, and remember the visions and the hopes. +They have lost all reality to you now; but who can say how many of them +you might have made real if there had been one other person who believed +in them, and loved them, and would not give them up?</p> + +<p>I write this; and then I think of the other side—the fools that I have +known in love! The trusting women, marrying rotten men to reform them! +The pitiful people who think that fine phrases and sentimentality can +take the place of<a name="vol_ii_page_074" id="vol_ii_page_074"></a> facts! I implore my young couples to sit down and +face the realities of their own natures, to decide what they are, and +what they want to be—and if there is going to be any change, let it be +made and tried out before marriage! I implore them to begin now to +control their desires by their reason and judgment; to begin, each of +them at the very outset, to carry their share of the burdens and do +their share of the hard work. I implore them to value independence and +self-reliance in the other, and never above all things to marry from +pity, which is a worthy emotion in its place, but has nothing to do with +sex, which should be an affair between equals, a matter of partnership +and not of parasitism. I think that, on the whole, the most dreadful +thing in love is the use of it for preying, for the securing of favors +and advantages of any sort, whether by men or by women.<a name="vol_ii_page_075" id="vol_ii_page_075"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLII" id="CHAPTER_XLII"></a>CHAPTER XLII<br /><br /> +EDUCATION FOR MARRIAGE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Maintains that the art of love can be taught, and that we have the +right and the duty to teach it.)</p></div> + +<p>I assume now that our young couple have definitely made up their minds, +and that the wedding day is near. They are therefore, both the man and +the woman, in position to receive information as to the physical aspects +of their future experience. This information is now for the most part +possessed only by pathologists—who impart it too late, after people +have blundered and wrecked their lives. The opponents of birth control +ask in horror if you would teach it to the young; I am now able to +answer just when I would teach it; I would teach it to these young +couples about to marry. I would make it by law compulsory for every +young couple to attend a school of marriage, and to learn, not merely +the regulation of conception, but the whole art of health and happiness +in sex.</p> + +<p>Perhaps the words, "a school of marriage," strike you as funny. When I +was young I remember that Pulitzer founded a school of journalism, and +all newspaper editors made merry—they knew that journalism could only +be learned in practice. But nowadays every city editor gives preference +to an applicant who has taken a college course in reporting; they have +learned that journalism can be taught, just like engineering and +accounting. In the same way I assert that marriage can be taught, and +the art of love, physical, mental, moral, and even financial; I think +that the day will come when enlightened parents would no more dream of +trusting their tender young daughter to a man who had not taken a course +in sex, than they would go up in an aeroplane with a pilot who knew +nothing about an engine.</p> + +<p>The knowledge which I possess upon the art of love I would be glad to +give you in this book; but unfortunately, if I were to do so, my book +would be suppressed, and I should be sent to jail.</p> + +<p>Some ten or twelve years ago I received a pitiful letter<a name="vol_ii_page_076" id="vol_ii_page_076"></a> from a man who +was in state's prison in Delaware, charged with having imparted +information as to birth control. Under our amiable legal system, a +perfectly innocent man may be thrown into jail, and kept there for a +year or two before he is tried, and if he is without money or friends, +he might as well be buried alive. I went to Wilmington to call on the +United States attorney who had caused the indictment in this case, and +had an illuminating conversation with him. The official was anxious to +justify what he had done. He assured me that he was no bigot, but on the +contrary an extremely liberal man, a Unitarian, a Progressive, etc. "But +Mr. Sinclair," he said, "I assure you this prisoner is not a reformer or +humanitarian or anything like that. He is a depraved person. Look, here +is something we found in his trunk when we arrested him; a pamphlet, +explaining about sex relations. See this paragraph—it says that the +pleasure of intercourse is increased if it is prolonged."</p> + +<p>I looked at the pamphlet, and then I looked at the attorney. "Do you +think you have stated the matter quite fairly?" I asked. "Apparently the +purpose is to explain that the emotions of women are more slow to be +aroused than those of men, and that husbands failing to realize this, +often do not gratify their wives."</p> + +<p>"Well," said the other, "do you consider that a subject to be +discussed?"</p> + +<p>"Pardon me if I discuss it just a moment," I replied. "Do you happen to +know whether the statement is a fact?"</p> + +<p>"No, I don't. It may be, I suppose."</p> + +<p>"You have never investigated the matter?"</p> + +<p>The legal representative of our government was evidently annoyed by my +persistence. "I have not," he answered.</p> + +<p>"But then, suppose I were to tell you that thousands of homes have been +broken up for lack of just that bit of knowledge; that tens of thousands +of marriages are miserable for lack of it."</p> + +<p>"Surely, Mr. Sinclair, you exaggerate!"</p> + +<p>"Not at all. I could prove to you by one medical authority after +another, that if the desire of a woman in marriage is roused, and then +left ungratified, the result is nervous strain, and in the long run it +may be nervous breakdown."</p> + +<p>The above covers only one detail of the pamphlet in question. I read +some pages of it, and argued them out with<a name="vol_ii_page_077" id="vol_ii_page_077"></a> the attorney. It was a +perfectly simple, straightforward exposition of facts about the +physiology of sex; and one of the reasons a man was to be sent to jail +for several years was—not that he had circulated such a pamphlet, not +that he had showed it to young people, but merely that he had it in his +trunk!</p> + +<p>There is an honest and very useful book, written by an English +physician, Dr. Marie C. Stopes, entitled "Married Love," published by +Dr. Wm. J. Robinson of New York, a specialist of authority and +integrity. The book deals with just such vital facts in a perfectly +dignified and straightforward manner; yet Dr. Robinson has been hounded +by the postoffice department because of it; he was convicted and forced +to pay a fine of $250, and the book was barred from the mails!</p> + +<p>I have so much else of importance to say in this Book of Love that it +would not be sensible to jeopardize it by causing a controversy with our +official censors of knowledge. Therefore I will merely say in general +terms that men and women differ, not merely as a sex, but as +individuals, and every marriage is a separate problem. Every couple has +to solve it in the intimacy of their love life, and for this there are +needed, first of all, gentleness on the part of the man, especially in +the first days of the honeymoon; and on the part of both at all times +consideration for the other's welfare and enjoyment, and above all, +frankness and honesty in talking out the subject. Reticence and shyness +may be virtues elsewhere, but they have no place in the intimacies of +the sex life; if men and women will only ask and answer frankly, they +can find out by experience what makes the other happy, and what causes +pain.</p> + +<p>We are dealing here with the most sacred intimacy of life, and one of +the most vital of life's problems. It is here, in the marriage bed, that +the divorce problem is to be settled, and likewise the problem of +prostitution; for it is when men and women fail to understand each +other, and to gratify each other, that one or the other turns cold and +indifferent, perhaps angry and hateful—and then we have passions +unsatisfied, and ranging the world, breaking up other homes and +spreading disease. So I would say to every young couple, seek knowledge +on this subject. Seek it without shame from others who have had a chance +to acquire it. Seek it also<a name="vol_ii_page_078" id="vol_ii_page_078"></a> from nature, our wise old mother, who knows +so much about her children!</p> + +<p>Be natural; be simple and straightforward; and beware of fool notions +about sex. If you will look in the code of Hammurabi, which is over four +thousand years old, you will see the provision that a man who has +intercourse with a menstruating woman shall be killed. In Leviticus you +will read that both the man and the woman are to be cast out from their +people. You will find that most people still have some such notion, +which is without any basis whatever in health. And this is only one +illustration of many I might give of ignorance and superstition in the +sex life. I would give this as one very good rule to bear in mind; your +love life exists for the happiness and health of yourself and your +partner, and not for Hammurabi, nor Moses, nor Jehovah, nor your +mother-in-law, nor anybody else on the earth or above it.</p> + +<p>Great numbers of people believe that women are naturally less passionate +than men, and that marital happiness depends upon men's recognizing +this. Of course, there are defective individuals, both men and women; +but the normal woman is every bit as passionate as a man, if once she +has been taught; and if love is given its proper place in life, and +monkish notions not allowed to interfere, she will remain so all through +life, in spite of child-bearing or anything else. I say to married +couples that they should devote themselves to making and preserving +passionate gratification in love; because this is the bright jewel in +the crown of marriage, and if lovers solve this problem, they will find +other problems comparatively simple.<a name="vol_ii_page_079" id="vol_ii_page_079"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLIII" id="CHAPTER_XLIII"></a>CHAPTER XLIII<br /><br /> +THE MONEY SIDE OF MARRIAGE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Deals with the practical side of the life partnership of +matrimony.)</p></div> + +<p>So far we have discussed marriage as if it consisted only of love. But +it is manifest that this is not the case. Marriage is every-day +companionship, and also it is partnership in a complicated business. In +our school of marriage therefore we shall teach the rights and duties of +both partners to the contract, and shall face frankly the money side of +the enterprise.</p> + +<p>One of the first facts we must get clear is that the economics of +marriage are in most parts of the world still based upon the subjection +of woman, and are therefore incompatible with the claims of woman as a +partner and comrade. They will never be right until the social +revolution has abolished privilege, and the state has granted to every +woman a maternity endowment, with a mother's pension for every child +during the entire period of the rearing and education of that child. +Until this is done, the average woman must look to some man for the +support of her child, and that, by the automatic operation of economic +force, makes her subject to the whims of the man. What women have to do +is to agitate for a revision of the property laws of marriage; and +meantime to see that in every marriage there is an extra-legal +understanding, which grants to the woman the equality which laws and +conventions deny her.</p> + +<p>When I was a boy my mother had a woman friend who, if she wanted to go +downtown, would borrow a quarter from my mother. This woman's husband +was earning a generous salary, enough to enable him to buy the best +cigars by the box, and to keep a supply of liquors always on hand; but +he gave his wife no allowance, and if she wanted pocket money she had to +ask him for it, each time a separate favor. Yet this woman was keeping a +home, she was doing just as hard work and just as necessary work as the +man. Manifestly, this was a preposterous arrangement. If a woman<a name="vol_ii_page_080" id="vol_ii_page_080"></a> is +going to be a home-maker for a husband, it is a simple, common-sense +proposition that the salary of the husband shall be divided into three +parts—first, the part which goes to the home, the benefit of which is +shared in common; second, the part which the husband has for his own +use; and third, the part which the wife has for hers. The second and +third parts should be equal, and the wife should have hers, not as a +favor, but as a right. If the two are making a homestead, or running a +farm, or building up a business, then half the proceeds should be the +woman's; and it should be legally in her name, and this as a matter of +course, as any other business contract. If the woman does not make a +home, but merely displays fine clothes at tea parties, that is of course +another matter. Just what she is to do is something that had better be +determined before marriage; and if a man wants a life-partner, to take +an interest in his work, or to have a useful work of her own, he had +better choose that kind of woman, and not merely one that has a pretty +face and a trim ankle.</p> + +<p>The business side of marriage is something that has to be talked out +from time to time; there have to be meetings of the board of directors, +and at these meetings there ought to be courtesy and kindness, but also +plain facts and common sense, and no shirking of issues. Love is such a +very precious thing that any man or woman ought to be willing to make +money sacrifices to preserve it. But on the other hand, it is a fact +that there are some people with whom you cannot be generous; the more +you give them, the more they take, and with such people the only safe +rule is exact justice. Let married couples decide exactly what +contribution each makes to the family life, and what share of money and +authority each is entitled to.</p> + +<p>I might spend several chapters discussing the various rocks on which I +have seen marriages go to wreck. For example, extravagance and worldly +show; clothes for women. In Paris is a "demi-monde," a world of brutal +lust combined with riotous luxury. The women of this "half-world" are in +touch with the world of art and fashion, and when the rich costumers and +woman-decorators want what they call ideas, it is to these lust-women +they go. The fashions they design are always depraved, of course; always +for the flaunting of sex, never for the suggestion of dignity and grave +intelligence. At several seasons of the year these lust-women are +decked<a name="vol_ii_page_081" id="vol_ii_page_081"></a> out and paraded at the race-courses and other gathering places +of the rich, and their pictures are published in the papers and spread +over all the world. So forthwith it becomes necessary for your wife in +Oshkosh or Kalamazoo to throw away all the perfectly good clothes she +owns, and get a complete new outfit—because "they" are wearing +something different. Of course the costume-makers have seen that it is +extremely different, so as to make it impossible for your wife and +children to be happy in their last season's clothes. I have a winter +overcoat which I bought fourteen years ago, and as it is still as good +as new I expect to use it another fourteen years, which will mean that +it has cost me a dollar and a half per year. But think what it would +have cost me if I had considered it necessary each year to have an +overcoat cut as the keepers of French mistresses were cutting theirs!</p> + +<p>But then, suppose you put it up to your wife and daughters to wear +sensible clothes, and they do so, and then they observe that on the +street your eyes turn to follow the ladies in the latest disappearing +skirt? The point is, you perceive, that you yourself are partly to blame +for the fashions. They appeal to a dirty little imp you have in your own +heart, and when the decent women discover that, it makes them blazing +hot, and that is one of the ways you may wreck your domestic happiness +if you want to. Unless I am greatly mistaken, when the class war is all +over we are going to see in our world a sex war; but it is not going to +be between the men and the women, it is going to be between the mother +women and the mistress women, and the mistress women are going to have +their hides stripped off.</p> + +<p>Men wreck marriage because they are promiscuous; and women wreck it +because they are parasites. Woman has been for long centuries an +economic inferior, and she has the vices of the subject peoples and +tribes. Now there are some who want to keep these vices, while at the +same time claiming the new privileges which go with equality. Such a +woman picks out a man who is sensitive and chivalrous; who knows that +women suffer handicaps, pains of childbirth, physical weakness, and who +therefore feels impelled to bear more than his share of the burdens. She +makes him her slave; and by and by she gets a child, and then she has +him, because he is bowed down with awe and worship, he thinks<a name="vol_ii_page_082" id="vol_ii_page_082"></a> that such +a miracle has never happened in the world before, and he spends the rest +of his life waiting on her whims and nursing her vanities. I note that +at the recent convention of the Woman's Party they demanded their rights +and agreed to surrender their privileges. There you have the final test +by which you may know that women really want to be free, and are +prepared to take the responsibilities of freedom.<a name="vol_ii_page_083" id="vol_ii_page_083"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLIV" id="CHAPTER_XLIV"></a>CHAPTER XLIV<br /><br /> +THE DEFENSE OF MONOGAMY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the permanence of love, and why we should endeavor to +preserve it.)</p></div> + +<p>So far in this discussion we have assumed that love means monogamous +love. We did so, for the reason that we could not consider every +question at once. But we have promised to deal with all the problems of +sex in the light of reason; and so we have now to take up the question, +what are the sanctions of monogamy, and why do we refuse sanction to +other kinds of love?</p> + +<p>First, let us set aside several reasons with which we have nothing to +do. For example, the reason of tradition. It is a fact that Anglo-Saxon +civilization has always refused legal recognition to non-monogamous +marriage. But then, Anglo-Saxon civilization has recognized war, and +slavery, and speculation, and private property in land, and many other +things which we presume to describe as crimes. If tradition cannot +justify itself to our reason, we shall choose martyrdom.</p> + +<p>Second, the religious reason. This is the one that most people give. It +is convenient, because it saves the need of thinking. Suffice it here to +say that we prefer to think. If we cannot justify monogamy by the facts +of life, we shall declare ourselves for polygamy.</p> + +<p>What are the scientific and rational reasons for monogamy? First among +them is venereal disease. This may seem like a vulgar reason, but no one +can deny that it is real. There was a time, apparently, when mankind did +not suffer from these plagues, and we hope there may be such a time +again. I shall not attempt to prescribe the marital customs for the +people of that happy age; I suspect that they will be able to take care +of themselves. Confining myself to my lifetime and yours, I say that the +aim of every sensible man and woman must be to confine sex relations to +the smallest possible limits. I know, of course, that there are +prophylactics, and the army and navy present statistics to show that +they succeed in a great proportion of cases. But if you are<a name="vol_ii_page_084" id="vol_ii_page_084"></a> one of +those persons in whose case they don't succeed, you will find the +statistics a cold source of comfort to you.</p> + +<p>John and Mary go to the altar, or to the justice of the peace, and John +says: "With all my worldly goods I thee endow." But the formula is +incomplete; it ought to read: "And likewise with the fruits of my wild +oats." Marriage is a contract wherein each of the contracting parties +agrees to share whatever pathogenic bacteria the other party may have or +acquire; surely, therefore, the contract involves a right of each party +to have a say as to how many chances of infection the other shall incur. +John goes off on a business trip, and is lonesome, and meets an +agreeable widow, and figures to himself that there is very little chance +that so charming a person can be dangerous. But maybe Mary wouldn't +agree with his calculations; maybe Mary would not consider it a part of +the marriage bargain that she should take the diseases of the agreeable +widow. What commonly happens is that Mary is not consulted; John revises +the contract in secret, making it read that Mary shall take a chance at +the diseases of the widow. How can any thinking person deny that John +has thus committed an act of treason to Mary?</p> + +<p>I know that there are people who don't mind running such chances; that +is one reason why there are venereal diseases. All I can say is that the +sex-code set forth in this book is based upon the idea that to deliver +mankind from the venereal plague, we wish to confine the sex +relationship within the narrowest limits consistent with health, +happiness and spiritual development; and that to this end we take the +young and teach them chastity, and we marry them early while they are +clean, and then we call upon them to make the utmost effort to make a +success of that union, and to make it a matter of honor to keep the +marital faith. We do this with some hope of effectiveness, because we +have made our program consistent with the requirements of nature, the +genuine needs of love both physical and spiritual.</p> + +<p>The second argument for monogamy is the economic one. We have dreamed a +social order where every child will be guaranteed maintenance by the +state, and where women will be free from dependence on men. What will be +the love arrangements of men and women under this new order is another +problem which we leave for them to decide, in the certainty that they +will know more about it than we do. Meantime,<a name="vol_ii_page_085" id="vol_ii_page_085"></a> we are for the present +under the private property régime, and have to love and marry and raise +our children accordingly. The children must have homes, and if they are +to be normal children, they must have both the male and female influence +in their lives; which means that their parents must be friends and +partners, not quarreling in secret. This argument, I know, is one of +expediency. I have adopted it, after watching a great number of people +try other than monogamous sex arrangements, and seeing their chances of +happiness and success wrecked by the pressure of economic forces. To +rebel against social compulsion may be heroism, and again it may be +merely bad judgment. For my part, the world's greatest evil is poverty, +the cause of crime, prostitution and war. I concentrate my energies upon +the abolishing of that evil, and I let other problems wait.</p> + +<p>The third reason is that monogamy is economical of human time and +thought. The business of finding and wooing a mate takes a lot of +energy, and adjustment after marriage takes more. To throw away the +results of this labor and do it all over again is certainly not common +sense. Of course, if you bake a cake and burn it, you have to get more +material and make another try; but that is a different matter from +baking a cake with the deliberate intention of throwing it away after a +bite or two.</p> + +<p>The advocates of varietism in love will here declare that we are begging +the question. We are assuming that love and the love chase are not +worthy in themselves, but merely means to some other end. Can it be that +love delights are the keenest and most intense that humans can +experience, and that all other purposes of life are contributory to +them? Certainly a great deal of art lends support to this idea, and many +poets have backed up their words by their deeds. As Coleridge phrased +it:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">"All thoughts, all passions, all delights,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0.25em;">Whatever stirs this mortal frame,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0.25em;">All are but ministers of Love</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0.25em;">And feed his sacred flame."</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>This is a question not to be played with. Experimenting in love is +costly, and millions have wrecked their lives by<a name="vol_ii_page_086" id="vol_ii_page_086"></a> it. The sex urge in us +is imperious and cruel; it wants nothing less than the whole of us, +body, mind and spirit, and ofttimes it behaves like the genii in the +bottle—it gets out, and not all the powers in the universe can get it +back. I have talked with many men about sex and heard them say that it +presents itself to them as an unmitigated torment, something they would +give everything they own to be free of. And these, mind you, not men +living in monasteries, trying to repress their natural impulses, but men +of the world, who have lived freely, seeking pleasure and taking it as +it came. The primrose path of dalliance did not lead them to peace, and +the pursuit of variety in love brought them only monotony.</p> + +<p>I stop and think of one after another of these sex-ridden people, and I +cannot think of one whom I would envy. I know one who in a frenzy of +unhappiness seized a razor and castrated himself. I think of another, a +certain classmate in college whom I once stopped in a conversation, +remarking: "Did you ever realize what a state you have got your mind +into? Everything means sex to you. Every phrase you hear, every idea +that is suggested—you try to make some sort of pun, to connect it +somehow or other with sex." The man thought and said, "I guess that's +true." The idea had never occurred to him before; he had just gone on +letting his instincts have their way with him, without ever putting his +reason upon the matter.</p> + +<p>That was a crude kind of sex; but I think of another man, an idealist +and champion of human liberty. One of the forms of liberty he maintained +was the right to love as many women as he pleased, and although he was a +married man, one hardly ever saw him that he was not courting some young +girl. As a result, his mental powers declined, and he did little but +talk about ideas. I do not know anyone today who respects him—except a +few people who live the same sort of life. The thought of him brings to +my mind a sentence of Nietzsche—a man who surely stood for freedom of +personality: "I pity the lovers who have nothing higher than their +love."</p> + +<p>A question like this can be decided only by the experience of the race. +Some will make love the end and aim of life, and others will make it the +means to other ends, and we shall see which kind of people achieve the +best results, which<a name="vol_ii_page_087" id="vol_ii_page_087"></a> kind are the most useful, the most dignified, the +most original and vital. I have seen a great many young people try the +experiment of "free love," and I have seen some get enough of it and +quit; I could name among these half a dozen of our younger novelists. I +know others who are still in it—and I watch their lives and find them +to be restless, jealous, egotistical and idle. My defense of monogamy is +based upon the fact that I have never known any happy or successful +"free lovers." Of course, I know some noble and sincere people who do +not believe in the marriage contract, and refuse to be bound by law; but +these people are as monogamous as I am, even more tightly bound by honor +than if they were duly married.</p> + +<p>It seems to be in the very nature of true and sincere love to imagine +permanence, to desire it and to pledge it. If you aren't that much in +love, you aren't really in love at all, and you had better content +yourself with strolling together and chatting together and dining +together and playing music together. So many pleasant ways there are in +which men and women can enjoy each other's company without entering upon +the sacred intimacy of sex! You can learn to take sex lightly, of +course, but if you do so, you reduce by so much the chances that true +and deep love will ever come to you; for true and deep love requires +some patience, some reverence, some tending at a shrine. The animals +mate quickly and get it over with; but the great discoveries about love, +and the possibilities of the human soul in love, have come because men +and women have been willing to make sacrifices for it, to take it +seriously—and more especially to take seriously the beloved person, the +rights and needs and virtues of that person. From the lives of such we +learn that love is nature's device for taking us out of ourselves, and +making us truly social creatures.</p> + +<p>Early in my life as a writer I undertook to answer Gertrude Atherton, in +her glorification of the sex-corruptions of capitalist society. She +indicted American literature for its "bourgeois" qualities—among these +the fact that American authors had a prejudice in favor of living with +their own wives. Mrs. Atherton set forth the joys of sex promiscuity as +they are understood by European artists, and I ventured in replying to +remark that "one woman can be more to a man than a dozen can possibly +be." That sounds like a paradox,<a name="vol_ii_page_088" id="vol_ii_page_088"></a> but it is really a profound truth, and +the person who does not understand it has missed the best there is in +the sex relation. There is a limit to the things of the body, but to +those of the mind and spirit there is no limit, and so there is no +reason why true love should ever fall prey to boredom and satiety.<a name="vol_ii_page_089" id="vol_ii_page_089"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLV" id="CHAPTER_XLV"></a>CHAPTER XLV<br /><br /> +THE PROBLEM OF JEALOUSY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the question, to what extent one person may hold another +to the pledge of love.)</p></div> + +<p>Once upon a time I knew an Anarchist shoemaker, the same who had me sent +to jail for playing tennis on Sunday, as I have narrated in "The Brass +Check." I remember arguing with him concerning his ideas of sex, which +were of the freest. I can hear the very tones of his voice as he put the +great unanswerable question: "What are you going to do about the problem +of jealousy?" And I had no response at hand; for jealousy is truly a +most cruel and devastating and unlovely emotion; and yet, how can you +escape it, if you are going to preserve monogamy?</p> + +<p>The Anarchist shoemaker's solution was to break down all the prejudices +against sexual promiscuity. Free and unlimited license was every +person's right, and for any other person to interfere was enslavement, +for any other person to criticize was superstition. But the power of +superstition is strong in the world, and the shoemaker found men +resentful of his teachings, and disposed to confiscate the rights of +their wives and daughters. Hence the shoemaker's disapproval of +jealousy.</p> + +<p>Other men, less purely physiological in their attitude to sex, have +wrestled with this same problem of jealousy. H. G. Wells has a novel, +"In the Days of the Comet," in which he portrays two men, both nobly and +truly in love with the same woman. One in a passion of jealousy is about +to murder the other, when a great social transformation is magically +brought about, and the would-be murderer wakes up to universal love, and +the two men nobly and lovingly share the same woman. Shelley also +dreamed this dream, inviting two women to share him. I have known others +who tried it, but never permanently. I do not say that it never has +succeeded, or that it never can succeed. In this book I am renouncing +the future—I am trying to give practical advice to people, for the +conduct of their lives here and now, and my advice on<a name="vol_ii_page_090" id="vol_ii_page_090"></a> this point is +that polygamous and polyandrous experiments in modern capitalist society +cost more than they are worth.</p> + +<p>I once knew a certain high school teacher, who believed religiously in +every kind of freedom. When she married, she and her husband, an artist, +made a vow against jealousy; but as it worked out, this vow meant that +the wife had a steady job and took care of the husband, while he loafed +and loved other women. When finally she grew tired of it, he accused her +of being jealous; also, she had brought it down to the matter of money! +I know another woman, an Anarchist, widely known as a lecturer on sex +freedom. She laid down the general principle of unlimited personal +freedom for all, and she tried to live up to her faith. She entered into +a "free union" with a certain man, and when she discovered that he was +making love to another woman, in the presence of a friend of mine she +threw a vase of flowers at his head. You see, her general principles had +clashed with another general principle, to the effect that a person who +feels deep and strong love inevitably desires that love to endure, and +cannot but suffer to see it preyed upon and destroyed.</p> + +<p>Let us first consider the question, just what are the true and proper +implications of monogamous love? The Roman Catholic church advocates +"monogamy," and understands thereby that a man and woman pledge +themselves "till death do us part," and if either of them cancels this +arrangement it is adultery and mortal sin. I hope that none of my +readers understands by "monogamy" any such system of spiritual +strangulation. My own idea is rather what some churchman has +sarcastically described by the term "progressive polygamy." I believe +that a man and woman should pledge their faith in love, and should keep +that faith, and endeavor with all their best energies to make a success +of it; they should strive each to understand the other's needs, and +unselfishly to fulfill them, within the limits of fair play. But if, +after such an effort has been truly made, it becomes clear that the +union does not mean health and happiness for one of the parties, that +party has a right to withdraw from it, and for any government or church +or other power to deny that right is both folly and cruelty.</p> + +<p>Now, on the basis of this definition of monogamy—or, if you prefer, of +progressive polygamy—we are in position to say what we think about +jealousy. If two people pledge<a name="vol_ii_page_091" id="vol_ii_page_091"></a> their faith, and one breaks it, and the +other complains, we do not call that jealousy, but just common decency. +Neither do we call it jealousy if one expects the other to avoid the +appearance of guilt; for love is a serious thing, not to be played with, +and I think that a person who truly loves will do everything possible to +make clear to the beloved that he is keeping and means to keep the +plighted faith.</p> + +<p>You may say that I am using words arbitrarily, in endeavoring thus to +distinguish between justifiable and unjustifiable jealousy, and calling +the former by some other name. It does not make much difference about +words, provided I make clear my meaning. I could point out a whole +string of words which have good meanings and bad meanings, and cannot be +discussed without preliminary explanations and distinctions; religion, +for example, and morality, and aristocracy, and justice, to name only a +few. Most people's thinking about marriage and love has been made like +soup in a cheap restaurant, by dumping in all kinds of scraps and +notions from such opposite poles of human thought as Christian monkery +and Renaissance license, absurdly called "romance." So before you can do +any thinking about a problem like jealousy, you have to agree to use the +word to mean something definite, whether good or bad.</p> + +<p>We shall take jealousy as a "bad" word, and use it to mean the setting +up, by a man or woman, of some claim to the love of another person, +which claim cannot be justified in the court of reason and fair play. +This includes, in the first place, all claims based upon a courtship, +not ratified by marriage. It is to the interest of society and the race +that men and women should be free to investigate persons of the other +sex, and to experiment with the affections before pledges of marriage +are made. If sensible customs of love and just laws of marriage were +made, there would be no excuse for a woman's giving herself to a man +before marriage; she should be taught not to do it, and then if she does +it, the risk is her own, and the disgusting perversion of venality and +greed known as the "breach of promise suit" should be unknown in our +law. The young should be taught that it is the other person's right to +change his mind and withdraw at any time before marriage; whatever pains +and pangs this may cause must be borne in silence.</p> + +<p>The second kind of jealousy is that which seeks to keep<a name="vol_ii_page_092" id="vol_ii_page_092"></a> in the marriage +bond a person who is not happy in it and has asked to be released. The +law sanctions this kind of cowardly selfishness, which manifests itself +every day on the front pages of our newspapers—a spectacle of monstrous +and loathsome passions unleashed and even glorified. Husbands set the +bloodhounds of the law after wives who have fled with some other man, +and send the man to a cell, and drag the woman back to a loveless home. +Wives engage private detectives, and trail their husbands to some "love +nest," and then ensue long public wrangles, with washing of filthy +linen, and the matter is settled by a "separation." The virtuous wife, +who may have driven the man away by neglect or vanity or stupidity, is +granted a share of his earnings for the balance of her life; and two +more people are added to the millions who are denied sexual happiness +under the law, and are thereby impelled to live as law violators.</p> + +<p>For this there is only one remedy conceivable. We have banned +cannibalism and slavery and piracy and duelling, and we must ban one +more ancient and cruel form of human oppression, the effort to hold +people in the bonds of sex by any other power save that of love. I am +aware that the reactionaries who read this book will take this sentence +out of its context and quote it to prove that I am a "free lover." I +shall be sorry to have that done, but even so, I was not willing to live +in slavery myself, and I am not willing to advocate it for others. I am +aware that there are degenerate and defective individuals, and that we +have to make special provision for them, as I shall presently set forth; +but the average, normal human being must be free to decide what is love +for him, and what is happiness for him. Every person in the world will +have to deny himself the right to demand love where love is not freely +given, and all lovers in the world will have to hold themselves ready to +let the loved one go if and when the loved one demands it. I am aware +that this is a hard saying, and a hard duty, but it is one that life +lays upon us, and one that there is no escaping.<a name="vol_ii_page_093" id="vol_ii_page_093"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLVI" id="CHAPTER_XLVI"></a>CHAPTER XLVI<br /><br /> +THE PROBLEM OF DIVORCE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Defends divorce as a protection to monogamous love, and one of the +means of preventing infidelity and prostitution.)</p></div> + +<p>You will hear sermons and read newspaper editorials about the "divorce +evil," and you will find that to the preacher or editor this "evil" +consists of the fact that more and more people are refusing to stay +unhappily married. It does not interest these moralizers if the +statistics show that it is women who are getting most of the divorces, +and that the meaning of the phenomenon is that women are refusing to +continue living with drunken and dissolute men. To the clergy, the +breaking of a marriage is an evil <i>per se</i>, and regardless of +circumstances. They know this because God has told them so, and in the +name of God they seek to keep people tied in sex unions which have come +to mean loathing instead of love.</p> + +<p>Now, I will assert it as a mathematical certainty that a considerable +percentage of marriages must fail. It is essential to progress that +human beings should grow, both mentally and spiritually, and manifestly +they cannot all grow in the same way. If they grow differently, must +they not sometimes lose the power to make each other happy in the +marital bonds? Who does not know the man who masters life and becomes a +vital force, while his wife remains dull and empty? If such a man +changes wives, the world in general denounces him as a selfish beast; +but the world does not know nor does it care about those thousands of +men who, not caring to be branded as selfish beasts, fulfill the needs +of their lives by keeping mistresses in secret.</p> + +<p>I knew a certain country school teacher, one of the most narrowly +conventional young women imaginable, who was engaged to a middle-aged +business man. He went to New York on a business trip, and stayed a +couple of months, and wrote her that he had met some Anarchists, and had +discovered that all he had read about them in the newspapers was false, +and that they were the true and pure idealists to whom the rest of his +life must be devoted. The young lady was horrified; nor was she any +happier when she came to New York and met her<a name="vol_ii_page_094" id="vol_ii_page_094"></a> fiancé's new friends. She +ought in common sense to have broken the engagement; but she was in +love, and she married, as many another fool woman does, with the idea of +"reforming" the man. She failed, and was utterly and unspeakably +wretched.</p> + +<p>I know another man, a conservative capitalist of narrow and aggressive +temper, whose wife turned into an ardent Bolshevik. The man thinks that +all Bolsheviks should be shut up in jail for life, while the wife is +equally certain that all jails should be razed to the ground and all +Bolsheviks placed in control of the government. These two people have +got to a point where they cannot sit down to the breakfast table without +flying into a quarrel. I know another case of a modern scientist, an +agnostic, whose wife, a half-educated, sentimental woman, took to +dabbling in mysticism, and drove him wild by setting up an image of +Buddha in her bedroom, and consorting with "swamis" in long yellow +robes. I know another whose wife turned into an ultra-pious Catholic, +and turned over the care of his domestic life to a priest. Is it not +obvious that the only possible solution of such problems lies in +divorce? Unless, indeed, we are all of us going to turn over the care of +our domestic lives to the priests!</p> + +<p>Our grandfathers and grandmothers believed one thing, and believed the +same thing when they were seventy as when they were twenty; so it was +possible for them to dwell in domestic security and permanence till +death did them part. But we are learning to change our minds; and +whether what we believe is better or worse than what our ancestors +believed, at least it is different. Also we are coming to take what we +believe with more seriousness; the intellectual life means more and more +to us, and it becomes harder and harder for us to find sexual and +domestic happiness with a partner who does not share our convictions, +but, on the contrary, may be contributing to the campaign funds of the +opposition party.</p> + +<p>I do not mean by this that people should get a divorce as soon as they +find they differ about some intellectual idea; on the contrary, I have +advocated that they should do everything possible to understand and to +tolerate each other. But it is a fact that intellectual convictions are +the raw material out of which characters and lives are made, and it is +inevitable that some characters and lives that fit quite well at twenty +should fit very badly at thirty or forty. When we refuse divorce under +such<a name="vol_ii_page_095" id="vol_ii_page_095"></a> circumstances we are not fostering marriage, as we fondly imagine; +we are really fostering adultery. It is a fact that not one person in +ten who is held by legal or social force in an unhappy sex union will +refrain from seeking satisfaction outside; and because these outside +satisfactions are disgraceful, and in some cases criminal, they seldom +have any permanence. Therefore it follows that "strict" divorce laws, +such as the clerical propaganda urges upon us, are in reality laws for +the promotion of fornication and prostitution.</p> + +<p>There is a short story by Edith Wharton, in which the "divorce evil" is +exhibited to us in its naked horror; the story called "The Other Two," +in the volume "The Descent of Man." A society woman has been divorced +twice and married three times, and by an ingenious set of circumstances +the woman and all three of the men are brought into the same +drawing-room at the same time. Just imagine, if you can, such an +excruciating situation: a woman, her husband, and two men who used to be +her husbands, all compelled to meet together and think of something to +say! I cite this story because it is a perfect illustration of the +extent to which the "divorce problem" is a problem of our lack of sense. +Mrs. Wharton will, I fear, consider me a very vulgar person if I assert +that there is absolutely no reason whatever why any of those four people +in her story should have had a moment's discomfort of mind, except that +they thought there was. There is absolutely nothing to prevent a man and +woman who used to be married from meeting socially and being decent to +each other, or to prevent two men from being decent to each other under +such circumstances. I would not say that they should choose to be +intimate friends—though even that may be possible occasionally.</p> + +<p>I know, because I have seen it happen. In Holland I met a certain +eminent novelist and poet, a great and lovable man. I visited his home, +and met his wife and two little children, and saw a man and woman living +in domestic happiness. The man had also two grown sons, and after a few +days he remarked that he would like me to meet the mother of these young +men. We went for a walk of a mile or so, and met a lady who lived in a +small house by herself, and who received us with a friendly welcome and +talked with us for a couple of hours about music and books and art. This +lady had been the writer's wife for ten years or so, and there had been +a terrible uproar when they voluntarily parted. But they had refused to<a name="vol_ii_page_096" id="vol_ii_page_096"></a> +pay attention to this uproar; they understood why they did not wish to +remain husband and wife any longer, but they did not consider it +necessary to quarrel about it, nor even to break off the friendship +which their common interests made possible. The two women in the case +were not intimate, I gathered, but they frequently met at the homes of +others, and found no difficulty in being friendly. I suggest to Mrs. +Wharton that this story is at least as interesting as the one she has +told; but I fear she will not care to write it, because apparently she +considers it necessary that people who are well bred and refined should +be the helpless victims of destructive manias.<a name="vol_ii_page_097" id="vol_ii_page_097"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLVII" id="CHAPTER_XLVII"></a>CHAPTER XLVII<br /><br /> +THE RESTRICTION OF DIVORCE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the circumstances under which society has the right to +forbid divorce, or to impose limitations upon it.)</p></div> + +<p>We have quoted the old maxim, "Marry in haste and repent at leisure," +and we suggested that parents and guardians should have the right to ask +the young to wait before marriage, and make certain of the state of +their hearts. We have now the same advice to give concerning divorce; +the same claim to enter on behalf of society—that it has and should +assert the right to ask people to delay and think carefully before +breaking up a marriage.</p> + +<p>What interest has society in the restriction of divorce? What affair is +it of any other person if I choose to get a divorce and marry a new wife +once a month? There are many reasons, not in any way based upon +religious superstition or conventional prejudice. In the first place, +there are or may be children, and society should try to preserve for +every child a home with a father and a mother in it. Second, there are +property rights, of which every marriage is a tangle, and the settlement +of which the law should always oversee. Third, there is the question of +venereal disease, which society has an unquestionable right to keep +down, by every reasonable restriction upon sexual promiscuity. And +finally, there is the respect which all men and women owe to love. It +seems to me that society has the same right to protect love against +extreme outrage, as it has to forbid indecent exposure of the person on +the street.</p> + +<p>There is in successful operation in Switzerland a wise and sane divorce +law, based upon common sense and not upon superstition. A couple wish to +break their marriage, and they go before a judge, and in private +session, as to a friendly adviser, they tell their troubles. He gives +them advice about their disagreement, and sends them away for three +months to think it over. At the end of three months, if they still +desire a divorce, they meet with him again. If he still thinks there is +a chance of reconciliation, he has the right to require them to wait +another three months. But if at the end of this second period<a name="vol_ii_page_098" id="vol_ii_page_098"></a> they are +still convinced that the case is hopeless, and that they should part, +the judge is required to grant the divorce. You may note that this is +exactly what I have suggested concerning young couples who become +engaged. In both cases, the parties directly interested have the right +to decide their own fate, but the rest of the world requires them to +think carefully about it, and to listen to counsel. Except for grave +offenses, such as adultery, insanity, crime or venereal disease, I do +not think that anyone should receive a divorce in less than six months, +nor do I think that any personal right is contravened by the imposing of +such a delay.</p> + +<p>Next, what are we going to say to the right, or the claim to the right, +on the part of a man or woman, to be married once a year throughout a +lifetime? In order to illustrate this problem, I will tell you about a +certain man known to me. In his early life he spent a couple of years in +a lunatic asylum. He lays claim to extraordinary spiritual gifts, and +uses the language of the highest idealism known. He is a man of culture +and good family, and thus exerts a peculiar charm upon young women of +refinement and sensitiveness. To my knowledge he was three times married +in six years, and each time he deserted the woman, and forced her to +divorce him, and to take care of herself, and in one case of a child. In +addition, he had begotten one child out of marriage, and left the mother +and child to starve. For ten years or so I used to see him about once in +six months, and invariably he had a new woman, a young girl of fine +character, who had been ensnared by him, and was in the agonizing +process of discovering his moral and mental derangement. Yet there was +absolutely nothing in the law to place restraint upon this man; he could +wander from state to state, or to the other side of the world, preying +upon lovely young girls wherever he went.</p> + +<p>This particular man happens to call himself a "radical"; but I could +tell you of similar men in the highest social circles, or in the +political world, the theatrical world, the "sporting" world; they are in +every rank of life, and are just as definitely and certainly menaces to +human welfare and progress as pirates on the high seas or highwaymen on +the road. Nor are they confined to the males; the world is full of women +who use their sex charms for predatory purposes, and some of them are +far too clever for any law that you or I can contrive at present. But I +think we might begin by refusing to let any man or<a name="vol_ii_page_099" id="vol_ii_page_099"></a> woman have more than +two divorces in one lifetime, in any state or part of the world. If any +man or woman tries three times to find happiness in love, and fails each +time, we have a right to assume that the fault must lie with that +person, and not with the three partners.</p> + +<p>I think we may go further yet; having made wise laws of love and +marriage, taking into consideration all human needs, we have a right to +require that men and women shall obey the laws. At present the great +mass of the public has sympathy for the law-breaker; just as, in old +days, the peasants could not help admiring the outlaw who resisted +unjust land laws and robbed the rich, or as today, under the capitalist +régime, we can not withhold our sympathy from political prisoners, even +though they have committed acts of violence which we deplore. But when +we have made sex laws that we know are just and sensible—then we shall +consider that we have the right to restrain sex criminals, and in +extreme cases we shall avail ourselves of the skill of science to +perform a surgical operation which will render him unable in future to +prey upon the love needs of people who are placed at his mercy by their +best qualities, their unselfishness and lack of suspicion.</p> + +<p>We clear out foul-smelling weeds from our garden, because we wish to +raise beautiful flowers and useful herbs therein. There lives in +California a student of plant life, who has shown us what we can do, not +by magic or by superhuman efforts, but simply by loving plants, by +watching them ceaselessly, understanding their ways, and guiding their +sex-life to our own purposes. We can perform what to our ignorant +ancestors would have seemed to be miracles; we can actually make all +sorts of new plants, which will continue to breed their own kind, and +survive forever if we give them proper care. In other words, Luther +Burbank has shown us that we can "change plant nature."</p> + +<p>There flash back upon my memory all those dull, weary, sick human +creatures, who have repeated to me that dull, weary, sick old formula, +"You cannot change human nature." I do not think I am indulging either +in religious superstition or in blind optimism, but am speaking +precisely, in saying that whenever human beings get ready to apply +experimental science to themselves, they can change human nature just as +they now change plant nature. By putting human bodies together in love, +we make new bodies of children more beautiful<a name="vol_ii_page_100" id="vol_ii_page_100"></a> than any who have yet +romped on the earth; and in the same way, by putting minds and souls +together, we can make new kinds of minds and souls, different from those +we have previously known, and greater than either the man-soul or the +woman-soul alone.</p> + +<p>Also, by that magic which is the law of mind and soul life, each new +creation can be multiplied to infinity, and shared by all other minds +and souls that live in the present or may live in the future. We have +shown elsewhere how genius multiplies to infinity the joy and power of +life by means of the arts; and one of the greatest of the arts is the +art of love. Consider the great lovers, the true lovers, of history—how +they have enriched the lives of us all. It does not make any difference +whether these men and women lived in the flesh, or in the brain of a +poet—we learn alike from Dante and Beatrice, from Abélard and Héloïse, +from Robert and Elizabeth Browning, from Tristan and Isolde, from Romeo +and Juliet, what is the depth and the splendor of this passion which +lies hidden within us, and how it may enrich and vivify and glorify all +life.<a name="vol_ii_page_101" id="vol_ii_page_101"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="PART_FOUR" id="PART_FOUR"></a>PART FOUR<br /><br /> + +THE BOOK OF SOCIETY</h2> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_102" id="vol_ii_page_102"></a></p> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_103" id="vol_ii_page_103"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLVIII" id="CHAPTER_XLVIII"></a>CHAPTER XLVIII<br /><br /> +THE EGO AND THE WORLD</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the beginning of consciousness, in the infant and in +primitive man, and the problem of its adjustment to life.)</p></div> + +<p>We have now to consider the relationship of man to his fellows, with +whom he lives in social groups. Upon this problem floods of light have +been thrown by the new science of psycho-analysis. I will try to give, +briefly and in simple language, an idea of these discoveries.</p> + +<p>One of the laws of biology is that every individual, in his development, +reproduces the history of the race; so that impulses and mental states +of a child reveal to us what our far-off ancestors loved and feared. The +same thing is discovered to be true of neurotics, people who have failed +in adjusting themselves to civilized life, and have gone back, in some +or all of their mental traits, to infantile states. If we analyze the +unconscious minds of "nervous patients," and compare them with what we +find in the minds of infants, and in savages, we discover the same +dreams, the same longings and the same fears.</p> + +<p>The mental life of man begins in the womb. We cannot observe that life +directly, but we know that it is there, because there cannot be organic +life without mind to direct it, and just as there is an unconscious mind +that regulates the bodily processes in adults, so in the embryo there +must be an unconscious mind to direct the flow of blood, the building of +bones, muscle, eyes and brain. The mental life of that unborn creature +is of course purely egotistical; it knows nothing outside itself, and it +finds this universe an agreeable place—everything being supplied to it, +promptly and perfectly, without effort of its own.</p> + +<p>But suddenly it gets its first shock; pain begins, and severe +discomfort, and the creature is shoved out into a cold world, yelling in +protest against the unsought change. And from that moment on, the +new-born infant labors to adjust itself to an entirely new set of +conditions. Discomforts trouble it, and it cries. Quickly it learns that +these cries are<a name="vol_ii_page_104" id="vol_ii_page_104"></a> answered, and satisfaction of its needs is furnished. +Somehow, magically, things appear; warm and dry covering, a trickle of +delicious hot milk into its mouth. At first the infant mind has no idea +how all this happens; but gradually it comes to realize objects outside +itself, and it forms the idea that these objects exist to serve its +wants. Later on it learns that there are particular sounds which attach +to particular objects, and cause them to function. The sound "Mama," for +example, produces a goddess clothed in beauty and power, performing +miracles. So the infant mind arrives at the "period of magic gestures" +and the "period of magic words"; corresponding to a certain type of myth +and belief which we find in every race and tribe of human being that now +exists or ever has existed on earth. All these stories about magic +wishes and magic rings and magic spells of a thousand sorts; and nowhere +on earth a child which does not listen greedily to such fancies! The +reason is simply that the child has passed through this stage of mental +life, and so recently that the feelings are close to the surface of his +consciousness.</p> + +<p>But gradually the infant makes the painful discovery that not everything +in existence can be got to serve him; there are forces which are proof +against his magic spells; there are some which are hostile, and these +the infant learns to regard with hatred and fear. Sometimes hatred and +fear are strangely mixed with admiration and love. For example, there is +a powerful being known as "father," who is sometimes good and useful, +but at other times takes the attention of the supremely useful "mother," +the source of food and warmth and life. So "father" is hated, and in +fancy he is wished out of the way—which to the infant is the same thing +as killing. Out of this grows a whole universe of fascinating mental +life, which Freud calls by the name "the Œdipus complex"—after the +legend of the Greek hero who murdered his father and committed incest +with his mother, and then, when he discovered what he had done, put out +his own eyes. There is a mass of legends, old as human thought, +repeating this story; we cannot be sure whether they have grown out of +the greeds and jealousies of this early wish-life of the infant, or +whether they had their base in the fact that there was a stage in human +progress in which the father really was killed off by the sons.</p> + +<p>This latter idea is discussed by Freud, in his book, "Totem<a name="vol_ii_page_105" id="vol_ii_page_105"></a> and Taboo." +It appears that primitive man lived in hordes, which were dominated by +one old male, who kept all the women to himself, and either killed the +young males, or drove them out to shift for themselves; so the young men +would combine and murder their father. The forming of human society, of +marriage and the family, depended upon one factor, the decision of the +young victors to live and let live. The only way they could do this was +to agree not to quarrel over the women of their own group, but to seek +other women from other groups. This may account for what is known as +"exogamy," an almost universal marriage custom of primitive man, whereby +a man named Jones is barred by frightful taboos from the women named +Jones, but is permitted relations with all the women named Smith.</p> + +<p>To return to our infant: he is in the midst of a painful process of +adjusting himself to the outside world; discovering that sometimes all +his magic words and gestures fail, his wishes no longer come true. There +are beings outside him, with wills of their own, and power to enforce +them; he has to learn to get along with these beings, and give up his +pleasures to theirs. These processes which go on in the infant soul, the +hopes and the terrors, the griefs and the angers, are of the profoundest +significance for the later adult life. For nothing gets out of the mind +that has once got into it; the infantile cravings which are repressed +and forgotten stay in the unconscious, and work there, and strive still +for expression. The conscious mind will not tolerate them, but they +escape in the form of fairy-tales and stories, of dreams and delusions, +slips of the tongue, and many other mental events which it is +fascinating to examine. Also, if we are weakened by ill health or +nervous strain, these infantile wishes may take the form of "neuroses," +and fully grown people may take to stammering, or become impotent, or +hysterical, or even insane, because of failures of adjustment to life +that happened when they were a year or two old. These things are known, +not merely as a matter of theory, but because, as soon as by analysis +these infant secrets are brought into consciousness and adjusted there, +the trouble instantly ceases.</p> + +<p>So it appears that the whole process of human life, from the very hour +of birth, consists of the correct adjustment of men and women in +relation to their fellows. Not merely is man a social being, but all the +prehuman ancestors of men,<a name="vol_ii_page_106" id="vol_ii_page_106"></a> for ages upon geologic ages, have been +social beings; they have lived in groups, and their survival has +depended upon their success in fitting themselves snugly into group +relationships. Failure to make correct adjustments means punishment by +the group, or by enemies outside the group; if the failure is serious +enough, it means death. We may assert that the task of understanding +one's fellow men, and making one's self understood by them, is the most +important task that confronts every individual.</p> + +<p>And if we look about the world at present, the most superficial of us +cannot fail to realize that the task is far from being correctly +performed. So many people unhappy, so many striving for what they cannot +get! So many having to be locked behind bars, like savage beasts, +because they demand something which the world is resolved not to let +them have! So many having to be killed, by rifles and machine-guns, by +high explosive shells and poison gas—because they misunderstood the +social facts about them, and thought they could fulfill some wishes +which the rest of mankind wanted them to repress! As I read the +psycho-analyst's picture of the newly born infant with its primitive +ego, its magic cries and magic gestures, I cannot be sure how much of it +is sober science and how much is mordant irony—a sketch of the mental +states of the men and women I see about me—whole classes of men and +women, yes, even whole nations!</p> + +<p>The effort of the following chapters will be to interpret to men and +women the world which they have made, and to which they are trying to +adjust themselves. More especially we shall try to show how, by better +adjustments, men may change both themselves and the world, and make both +into something less cruel and less painful, more serene and more certain +and more free.<a name="vol_ii_page_107" id="vol_ii_page_107"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XLVIX" id="CHAPTER_XLVIX"></a>CHAPTER XLVIX<br /><br /> +COMPETITION AND CO-OPERATION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the relation of the adult to society, and the part which +selfishness and unselfishness play in the development of social +life.)</p></div> + +<p>Pondering the subject of this chapter, I went for a stroll in the +country, and seating myself in a lonely place, became lost in thought; +when suddenly my eye was caught by something moving. On the bare, hot, +gray sand lay a creature that I could see when it moved and could not +see when it was still, for it was exactly the color of the ground, and +fitted the ground tightly, being flat, and having its edges scalloped so +that they mingled with the dust. It was a lizard, covered with heavy +scales, and with sharp horns to make it unattractive eating. At the +slightest motion from me it vanished into a heap of stones, so quickly +that my eye could scarcely follow it.</p> + +<p>This creature, you perceive, is in its actions and its very form an +expression of terror; terror of devouring enemies, of jackals that +pounce and hawks that swoop, and also of the hot desert air that seeks +to dry out its few precious drops of moisture. Practically all the +energies of this creature are concentrated upon the securing of its own +individual survival. To be sure, it will mate, but the process will be +quick, and the eggs will be left for the sun to hatch out, and the baby +lizards will shift for themselves—that is to say, they will be +incarnations of terror from the moment they open their eyes to the +light.</p> + +<p>The jackal seeks to pounce upon the lizard, and so inspires terror in +the lizard; but when you watch the jackal you find that it exhibits +terror toward more powerful foes. You find that the hawk, which swoops +upon the lizard, is equally quick to swoop away when it comes upon a man +with a gun. This preying and being preyed upon, this mixture of cruelty +and terror, is a conspicuous fact of nature; if you go into any orthodox +school or college in America today, you will be taught that it is +nature's most fundamental law, and governs all living things. If you +should take a course in political<a name="vol_ii_page_108" id="vol_ii_page_108"></a> economy under a respectable +professor, you would find him explaining that such cruelty-terror +applies equally in human affairs; it is the basis of all economic +science, and the effort to escape from it is like the effort to lift +yourself by your boot-straps.</p> + +<p>The professor calls this cruelty-terror by the name "competition"; and +he creates for his own purposes an abstract being whom he names "the +economic man," a creature who acts according to this law, and exists +under these conditions. One of the professor's formulas is the so-called +"Malthusian law," that population presses always upon the limits of +subsistence. Another is "the law of diminishing returns of agriculture," +that you can get only so much product out of a certain piece of land, no +matter how much labor and capital you put into it. Another is Ricardo's +"iron law of wages," that wages cannot rise above the cost of living. +Another is embodied in the formula of Adam Smith, that "Competition is +the life of trade." The professor enunciates these "laws," coldly and +impersonally, as becomes the scientist; but if you go into the world of +business, you find them set forth cynically, in scores of maxims and +witticisms: "Dog eat dog," "the devil take the hindmost," "business is +business," "do others or they will do you."</p> + +<p>Evidently, however, there is something in man which rebels against these +"natural" laws. In our present society man has set aside six days in the +week in which to live under them, and one day in the week in which to +preach an entirely different and contradictory code—that of Christian +ethics, which bids you "love your neighbor," and "do unto others as you +would they should do unto you." Between these Sunday teachings and the +week-day teachings there is eternal conflict, and one who takes pleasure +in ridiculing his fellow men can find endless opportunity here. The +Sunday preachers are forbidden to interfere with the affairs of the +other six days; that is called "dragging politics into the pulpit." On +the other hand, incredible as it may seem, there are professors of the +week-day doctrine who call themselves Christians, and believe in the +Sunday doctrine, too. They manage this by putting the Sunday doctrine +off into a future world; that is, we are to pounce upon one another and +devour one another under the "iron laws" of economics so long as we live +on earth, but in the next world we shall play on golden harps and have<a name="vol_ii_page_109" id="vol_ii_page_109"></a> +nothing to do but love one another. If anybody is so foolish as to apply +the Sermon on the Mount to present-day affairs, we regard him as a +harmless crank; if he persists, and sets out to teach others, we call +him a Communist or a Pacifist, and put him in jail for ten or twenty +years.</p> + +<p>In the Book of the Mind, I have referred to Kropotkin's "Mutual Aid as a +Factor in Evolution," which I regard as one of the epoch-making books of +our time. Kropotkin clearly proves that competition is not the only law +of nature, it is everywhere modified by co-operation, and in the great +majority of cases co-operation plays a larger part in the relations of +living creatures than competition. There is no creature in existence +which is entirely selfish; in the nature of the case such a creature +could not exist—save in the imaginations of teachers of special +privilege. If a species is to survive, some portion of the energies of +the individual must go into reproduction; and steadily, as life +advances, we find the amount of this sacrifice increasing. The higher +the type of the creature, the longer is the period of infancy, and the +greater the sacrifice of the parent for the young. Likewise, most +creatures make the discovery that by staying together in herds or +groups, and learning to co-operate instead of competing among +themselves, they increase their chances of survival. You find birds that +live in flocks, and other birds, like hawks and owls and eagles, that +are solitary; and you find the co-operating birds a thousand times as +numerous—that is to say, a thousand times as successful in the struggle +for survival. You find that all man's brain power has been a social +product; the supremacy he has won over nature has depended upon one +thing and one alone—the fact that he has managed to become different +from the "economic man," that product of the imagination of the +defenders of privilege.</p> + +<p>It is evident that both competition and co-operation are necessary to +every individual, and the health of the individual and of the race lies +in the proper combination of the two. If a creature were wholly +unselfish—if it made no effort to look after its own individual +welfare—it would be exterminated before it had a chance to reproduce. +If, on the other hand, it cannot learn to co-operate, its progeny stand +less chance of survival against creatures which have learned this +important lesson. We have a nation of a 110,000,000 people, who have +learned to co-operate to a certain limited extent.<a name="vol_ii_page_110" id="vol_ii_page_110"></a> Some of us realize +how vastly the happiness of these millions might be increased by a +further extension of co-operation; but we find ourselves opposed by the +professors of privilege—and we wish that these gentlemen would go out +and join the lizards of the desert sands or the sharks of the sea, +creatures which really practice the system of "laissez faire" which the +professors teach.</p> + +<p>The plain truth is that we cannot make a formula out of either +competition or co-operation. We cannot settle any problem of economics, +of business or legislation, by proclaiming, for example, that +"Competition is the life of trade." Competition may just as well turn +out to be the death of trade; it depends entirely upon the kind of +competition, and the stage of trade development to which it is applied. +In the early eighteenth century, when that formula of Adam Smith was +written, competition was observed to keep down prices and provide +stimulus to enterprise, and so to further abundant production. But the +time came when the machinery for producing goods was in excess, not +merely of the needs of the country, but of the available foreign +markets, and then suddenly the large-scale manufacturers made the +discovery that competition was the death of trade to them. They +proceeded, as a matter of practical common sense, and without consulting +their college professors, to abolish competition by forming trusts. We +passed laws forbidding them to do this, but they simply refused to obey +the laws. In the United States they have made good their refusal for +thirty-five years, and in the end have secured the blessing of the +Supreme Court upon their course.</p> + +<p>So now we have co-operation in large-scale production and marketing. It +is known by various names, "pools," "syndicates," "price-fixing," +"gentlemen's agreements." It is a blessing for those who co-operate, but +it proves to be the death of those who labor, and also of those who +consume, and we see these also compelled to combine, forming labor +unions and consumers' societies. Each side to the quarrel insists that +the other side is committing a crime in refusing to compete, and our +whole social life is rent with dissensions over this issue. Manifestly, +we need to clear our minds of dead doctrines; to think out clearly just +what we mean by competition, and what by co-operation, and what is the +proper balance between the two.<a name="vol_ii_page_111" id="vol_ii_page_111"></a></p> + +<p>I have been at pains in this book to provide a basis for the deciding of +such questions. It is a practical problem, the fostering of human life +and the furthering of its development. We cannot lay down any fixed +rule; we have to study the facts of each case separately. We shall say, +this kind of competition is right, because it helps to protect human +life and to develop its powers. We shall say, this other kind of +competition is wrong because it has the opposite effect. We shall say, +perhaps, that some kind was right fifty years ago, or even ten years +ago, because it then had certain effects; but meantime some factor has +changed, and it is now having a different effect, and therefore ought to +be abolished.</p> + +<p>There has never been any kind of human competition which men did not +judge and modify in that way; there is no field of human activity in +which ethical codes do not condemn certain practices as unfair. The +average Englishman considers it proper that two men who get into a +dispute shall pull off their coats, and settle the question at issue by +pummeling each other's noses. But let one of these men strike his +opponent in the groin, or let him kick his shins, and instantly there +will be a howl of execration. Likewise, an Anglo-Saxon man who fights +with the fists has a loathing for a Sicilian or Greek or other +Mediterranean man who will pull a knife. That kind of competition is +barred among our breeds; and also the kind which consists of using +poisons, or of starting slanders against your opponent.</p> + +<p>If you look back through history, you find many forms of competition +which were once eminently respectable, but now have been outlawed. There +was a time, for example, when the distinction we draw between piracy and +sea-war was wholly unknown. The ships of the Vikings would go out and +raid the ships and seaports of other peoples, and carry off booty and +captives, and the men who did that were sung as heroes of the nation. +The British sea-captains of the time of Queen Elizabeth—Drake, +Frobisher, and the rest of them—are portrayed in our school books as +valiant and hardy men, and the British colonies were built on the basis +of their activities; yet, according to the sea laws in force today, they +were pirates. We regard a cannibal race with abhorrence; yet there was a +time when all the vigorous races of men were cannibals, and the habit of +eating your enemies in<a name="vol_ii_page_112" id="vol_ii_page_112"></a> battle may well have given an advantage to the +races which practiced it.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, you find sentimental people who reject all +competition on principle, and would like to abolish every trace of it +from society, and especially from education. But stop and consider for a +moment what that would mean. Would you abolish, for example, the +competition of love, the right of a man to win the girl he wants? You +could not do it, of course; but if you could, you would abolish one of +the principal methods by which our race has been improved. Of course, +what you really want is, not to abolish competition in love, but to +raise it to a higher form. There is an old saying, "All's fair in love +and war," but no one ever meant that. You would not admit that a man +might compete in love by threatening to kill the girl if she preferred a +rival. You would not admit that he might compete by poisoning the other +man. You would not admit that he might compete by telling falsehoods +about the other man. On the other hand, if you are sensible, you admit +that he has a right to compete by making his character known to the +girl, and if the other man is a rascal, by telling the girl that.</p> + +<p>Would you abolish the competition of art, the effort of men to produce +work more beautiful and inspiring than has ever been known before? Would +you abolish the effort of scientists to overthrow theories which have +hitherto been accepted? Obviously not. You make these forms of +competition seem better by calling them "emulation," but you do not in +the least modify the fact that they involve the right of one person to +outdo other persons, to supplant them and take away something from them, +whether it be property or position or love or fame or power. In that +sense, competition is indeed the law of life, and you might as well +reconcile yourself to it, and learn to play your part with spirit and +good humor.</p> + +<p>Also, you might as well train your children to it. You will find you +cannot develop their powers to the fullest without competition; in fact, +you will be forced to go back and utilize forms of competition which are +now out of date among adults. I have told in the Book of the Body how I +myself tried for ten years or more to live without physical competition, +and discovered that I could not; I have had to take up some form of +sport, and hundreds of thousands of other men<a name="vol_ii_page_113" id="vol_ii_page_113"></a> have had the same +experience. What is sport? It is a deliberate going back, under +carefully devised rules, to the savage struggles of our ancestors. The +very essence of real sport is that the contestants shall, within the +rules laid down, compete with each other to the limit of their powers. +With what contempt would a player of tennis or baseball or whist regard +the proposition that his opponent should be merciful to him, and let him +win now and then! Obviously, these things have no place in the game, and +to be a "good sport" is to conform to the rules, and take with enjoyment +whatever issue of the struggle may come.</p> + +<p>But then again, suppose you are competing with a child; obviously, the +conditions are different. You no longer play the best you can, you let +the child win a part of the time; but you do not let the child know +this, or it would spoil the fun for the child. You pretend to try as +hard as you know how, and you cry out in grief when you are beaten, and +the child crows with delight. And yet, that does not keep you from +loving the child, or the child from loving you.</p> + +<p>The purpose of this elaborate exposition is to make clear the very vital +point that a certain set of social acts may be right under some +conditions, and desperately wrong under other conditions. They may be +right in play, and not in serious things; they may be right in youth, +and not in maturity; they may be right at one period of the world's +development, while at another period they are destructive of social +existence. If, therefore, we wish to know what are right and wrong +actions in the affairs of men, if we wish to judge any particular law or +political platform or program of business readjustment, the first thing +we have to do is to acquire a mass of facts concerning the society to +which the law or platform or program, is to be applied. We need to ask +ourselves, exactly what will be the effect of that change, applied in +that particular way at that particular time. In order to decide +accurately, we need to know the previous stages through which that +society has passed, the forces which have been operating in it, and the +ways in which they have worked.</p> + +<p>But also we must realize that the lessons of history cannot ever be +accepted blindly. The "principles of the founders" apply to us only in +modified form; for the world in which we live today is different from +any world which has ever been before, and the world tomorrow will be +different yet. We<a name="vol_ii_page_114" id="vol_ii_page_114"></a> are the makers of it, and the masters of it, and what +it will be depends to some extent upon our choice. In fact, that is the +most important lesson of all for us to learn; the final purpose of all +our thought about the world is to enable us to make it a happier and a +better world for ourselves and our posterity to live in.<a name="vol_ii_page_115" id="vol_ii_page_115"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_L" id="CHAPTER_L"></a>CHAPTER L<br /><br /> +ARISTOCRACY AND DEMOCRACY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the idea of superior classes and races, and whether +there is a natural basis for such a doctrine.)</p></div> + +<p>In the letters of Thomas Jefferson is found the following passage:</p> + +<p>"All eyes are open or opening to the rights of man. The general spread +of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable +truth that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their +backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them +legitimately, by the grace of God."</p> + +<p>This, which Jefferson, over a hundred years ago, described as a +"palpable truth," is still a long way from prevailing in the world. We +are trying in this book not to take anything for granted, so we do not +assume this truth, but investigate it; and we begin by admitting that +there are many facts which seem to contradict it, and which make it more +difficult of proof than Jefferson realized. It is not enough to point +out the lack of saddles on the backs, and of boots and spurs on the feet +of newly born infants; for the fact is that men are not exploited +because of saddles, nor is the exploiting accomplished by means of boots +and spurs. It is done by means of gold and steel, banks and credit +systems, railroads, machine-guns and battleships. And while it is not +true that certain races and classes are born with these things on them, +they are born to the possession of them, and the vast majority of +mankind are without them all their lives, and without the ability to use +them even if they had them.</p> + +<p>The doctrine that "all men are created equal," or that they ought to be +equal, we shall describe for convenience as the democratic doctrine. It +first came to general attention through Christianity, which proclaimed +the brotherhood of all mankind in a common fatherhood of God. But even +as taught by the Christians, the doctrine had startling limitations. It +was several centuries before a church council summoned the courage to +decide that women were human beings,<a name="vol_ii_page_116" id="vol_ii_page_116"></a> and had souls; and today many +devout Christians are still uncertain whether Japanese and Chinese and +Filipinos and Negroes are human beings, and have souls. I have heard old +gentlemen in the South gravely maintain that the Negro is not a human +being at all, but a different species of animal. I have heard learned +men in the South set forth that the sutures in the Negro skull close at +some very early age, and thus make moral responsibility impossible for +the black race. And you will find the same ideas maintained, not merely +as to differences of race and color, but as to differences of economic +condition. You will find the average aristocratic Englishman quite +convinced that the "lower orders" are permanently inferior to himself, +and this though they are of the same Anglo-Saxon stock.</p> + +<p>For convenience I will refer to the doctrine that there is some natural +and irremovable inferiority of certain races or classes, as the +aristocratic doctrine. I will probably startle some of my readers by +making the admission that if there is any such natural or irremovable +inferiority, then a belief in political or economic equality is a +blunder. If there are certain classes or races which cannot think, or +cannot learn to think as well as other classes and races, those mentally +inferior classes and races will obey, and they will be made to obey, and +neither you nor I, nor all the preachers and agitators in the world, +will ever be able to arrange it otherwise. Suppose we could do it, we +should be committing a crime against life; we should be holding down the +race and aborting its best development.</p> + +<p>Is there any such natural and irremovable inferiority in human beings? +When we come to study the question we find it complicated by a different +phenomenon, that of racial immaturity, which we have to face frankly and +get clear in our minds. One of the most obvious facts of nature is that +of infancy and childhood. We have just pointed out that if you are +competing with a child, you do it in an entirely different way and under +an entirely different set of rules, and if you fail to do this, you are +unfair and even cruel to the child. And it is a fact of our world that +there are some races more backward in the scale of development than +other races. You may not like this fact, but it is silly to try to evade +it. People who live in savage huts and beat on tom-toms and fight with +bows and arrows and cannot count beyond<a name="vol_ii_page_117" id="vol_ii_page_117"></a> a dozen—such people are not +the mental or moral equals of our highly civilized races, and to treat +them as equals, and compete with them on that basis, means simply to +exterminate them. And we should either exterminate them at once and be +done with it, or else make up our minds that they are in a childhood +stage of our race, and that we have to guide them and teach them as we +do our children.</p> + +<p>There is no more useful person than the wise and kind teacher. But +suppose we saw some one pretending to be a teacher to our children, +while in reality enslaving and exploiting them, or secretly robbing and +corrupting them—what would we say about that kind of teacher? The name +of that teacher is capitalist commercialism, and his profession is known +as "the white man's burden"; his abuse of power is the cause of our +present racial wars and revolts of subject peoples. A fair-minded man, +desirous of facing all the facts of life, hardly knows what stand to +take in such a controversy; that is, hardly knows from which cause the +colored races suffer more—the white man's exploitation, or their own +native immaturity.</p> + +<p>To say that certain races are in a childhood stage, and need instruction +and discipline, is an entirely different thing from saying they are +permanently inferior and incapable of self-government. Whether they are +permanently inferior is a problem for the man of science, to be +determined by psychological tests, continued possibly over more than one +generation. We have not as yet made a beginning; in fact, we have not +even acquired the scientific impartiality necessary to such an inquiry.</p> + +<p>In the meantime, all that we can do is to look about us and pick up +hints where we can. In places like Massachusetts, where Negroes are +allowed to go to college and are given a chance to show what they can +do, they have not ousted the white man, but many of them have certainly +won his respect, and one finds charming and cultured men among them, who +show no signs of prematurely closed up skulls. And one after another we +see the races which have been held down as being inferior, developing +leadership and organization and power of moral resistance. The Irish are +showing themselves today one of the most vigorous and high-spirited of +all races. The Hindus are developing a movement which in the long run +may prove more powerful than the white man's gold and<a name="vol_ii_page_118" id="vol_ii_page_118"></a> steel. The +Egyptians, the Persians, the Filipinos, the Koreans, are all devising +ways to break the power of capitalist newspaper censorship. How sad that +the subject races of the world have to get their education through +hatred of their teachers, instead of through love!</p> + +<p>Of course, these rebel leaders are men who have absorbed the white man's +culture, at least in part; practically always they are of the younger +generation, which has been to the white man's schools. But this is the +very answer we have been seeking—as to whether the race is permanently +inferior, or merely immature and in need of training. It is not only +among the brown and black and yellow races that progress depends upon +the young generations; that is a universal fact of life.</p> + +<p>In the course of this argument we shall assume that the Christian or +democratic theory has the weight of probability on its side, and that +nature has not created any permanently and necessarily inferior race or +class. We shall assume that the heritage of culture is a common +heritage, open to all our species. We shall not go so far as the +statement which Jefferson wrote into the Declaration of Independence, +that "all men are created free and equal"; but we shall assert that they +are created "with certain inalienable rights," and that among these is +the right to maintain their lives and to strive for liberty and +happiness. Also, we shall say that there will never be peace or order in +the world until they have found liberty, and recognition of their right +to happiness.<a name="vol_ii_page_119" id="vol_ii_page_119"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LI" id="CHAPTER_LI"></a>CHAPTER LI<br /><br /> +RULING CLASSES</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Deals with authority in human society, how it is obtained, and +what sanction it can claim.)</p></div> + +<p>It is possible to conceive an order of nature in which all individuals +were born and developed exactly alike and with exactly equal powers. +Such is apparently the case with lower animals, for example the ants and +the bees. But among human beings there are great differences; some are +born idiots and some are born geniuses. Even supposing that we are able +to do away with blindness and idiocy, it is not likely that we can ever +make a race of uniform genius. There will always be some more capable +minds, who will discover new powers of life, and will compel the others +to learn from them. It is to the interest of the race that this learning +should be done as quickly as possible. In other words, the great problem +of society is how to recognize superior minds and put them in authority.</p> + +<p>We look back over history, and discover a few wise men, and many rulers; +but very, very rarely does it happen that the ruler is a wise man, or a +friend of wise men. Far more often we find the ruler occupied in +suppressing the wise man and his wisdom. There was a ruler who allowed +the mob to crucify Jesus, and another who ordered Socrates to drink the +hemlock, and another who tortured Galileo, and another who chopped off +the head of Sir Walter Raleigh—and so on through a long and tragic +chronicle. And even when the accident of a wise ruler occurs he is apt +to be surrounded by a class of parasites and corrupt officials who are +busy to thwart his will.</p> + +<p>The general run of history is this: some group seizes power by force, +and holds it by the same means, and seeks to augment and perpetuate it. +Those who win the power are frequently men of energy and practical +sense, and do fairly well as governors; but they are never able to hand +on their virtues, and their line becomes corrupted by sensuality and +self-indulgence, and the subject classes are plundered and driven to +revolt. Often the revolt fails, but in the course<a name="vol_ii_page_120" id="vol_ii_page_120"></a> of time it succeeds, +and there is a new dynasty, or a new ruling class, sometimes a little +better than the old, sometimes worse.</p> + +<p>How shall one judge whether the new régime is better or worse? +Obviously, this is a most important question; it has to do, not merely +with history, but with our daily affairs, our voting. As one who has +read some tens of thousands of pages of history, and has pondered its +lessons with heart-sickness and despair, I lay down this general law by +which revolts and changes of power may be judged: If the change results +in the holding of power by a smaller number of people, it is a reaction; +but if the change results in distributing the power among a larger group +of the community, then that community has made a step in advance.</p> + +<p>I have seen a sketch of the history of some Central American +country—Guatemala, I think—which showed 130 revolutions in less than a +hundred years. Some rascal gets together a gang, and seizes the +government and plunders its revenue. When he has plundered too much, +some other rascal stirs up the people, and gets together another gang. +Such "revolutions" we regard as subjects for comic opera, and for the +Richard Harding Davis type of fiction; but we do not consider them as +having any relationship to progress. We describe them as "palace" +revolutions.</p> + +<p>But compare with this the various English revolutions. We write learned +histories about them, and describe England as "the Mother of +Parliaments." The reason for this is that when there was political +discontent in England, the protesting persons proceeded to organize +themselves, and to understand their trouble and to remedy it. They had +the brain power to do this; they maintained their right to do it, and +when by violence or threats of violence they forced the ruling class to +give way, they brought about a wider extension of liberty, a wider +distribution of power. Tennyson has pictured England as a state "where +freedom slowly broadens down from precedent to precedent." We today, +reading its history, are inclined to put a sarcastic emphasis on the +word "slowly"; but Tennyson would answer that it is better for a +community to move forward slowly than to move forward rapidly and then +move backward nearly as far.</p> + +<p>We have pointed out several times the important fact of biology that +change does not necessarily mean progress from<a name="vol_ii_page_121" id="vol_ii_page_121"></a> any rational or moral +point of view. Degeneration is just as real a fact as progress, and it +does not at all follow that because things change they are changing for +the better. It is worth while to repeat this in discussing human +society, for it is just as true of governments and morals as of living +species. A nation may pile up wealth, and multiply a hundredfold the +machinery of wealth production, and only be increasing luxury and +wantonness and graft. A nation may change its governmental forms, its +laws and social conventions, and boast noisily of these changes in the +name of progress, while as a matter of fact it is following swiftly the +road to ruin which all the empires of history have traced. So far as I +can discover, there is one test, and only one, by which you can judge, +and that is the test already indicated: Is the actual, effective power +of the state wielded by a larger or a smaller percentage of the +population than before the change took place?</p> + +<p>You will note the words "actual, effective power." Nothing is more +familiar in human life than for forms to survive after the spirit which +created them is dead; and nothing is more familiar than the use of these +forms as masks to deceive the populace. There have been many times in +history when people have gone on voting, long after their votes ceased +to count for anything; there have been many times when people have gone +through the motions of freedom long after they have been slaves. Mexico +under Diaz had one of the most perfect of constitutions, and was in +reality one of the most perfect of despotisms; and we Americans are +sadly familiar with political democracies which do not work.</p> + +<p>Shall we, therefore, join the pessimists and say that history is a blind +struggle for useless power, and that the notion of progress is a +delusion? I do not think so; on the contrary, I think it is easily to be +demonstrated that there has been a steady increase in the amount of +knowledge possessed by the race, and in the spread of this knowledge +among the whole population. I think that through most of the period of +written history we can trace a real development in human society. I +think we can analyze the laws of this development, and explain its +methods; and I think this knowledge is precious to us, because it +enables us to accelerate the process and to make the end more certain. +This task, the analysis of social evolution, is the task we have next to +undertake.<a name="vol_ii_page_122" id="vol_ii_page_122"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LII" id="CHAPTER_LII"></a>CHAPTER LII<br /><br /> +THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the series of changes through which human society has +passed.)</p></div> + +<p>We have now to consider, briefly, the history of man as a social being, +the groups he has formed, and the changes in his group systems. +Everything in life grows, and human societies are no exception to the +rule. They have undergone a long process of evolution, which we can +trace in detail, and which we find conforms exactly to the law laid down +by Herbert Spencer; a process whereby a number of single and similar +things become different parts of one complex thing. In the case of human +societies the units are men and women, and social evolution is a process +whereby a small and simple group, in which the individuals are +practically alike, grows into a large and complex group, in which the +individuals are widely different, and their relations one to another are +complicated and subtle.</p> + +<p>There are two powerful forces pressing upon human beings, and compelling +them to struggle and grow. The first of these forces is fear, the need +of protection against enemies; the second is hunger, the need of food +and the means of producing and storing food. The first causes the +individual to combine with his fellows and establish some form of +government, and this is the origin of political evolution. The second +causes him to accumulate wealth, and to combine industrially, and this +is the origin of economic evolution. Because the first force is a little +more urgent, we observe in the history of human society that evolution +in government precedes evolution in industry.</p> + +<p>I made this statement some twenty years ago, in an article in "Collier's +Weekly." I wrote to the effect that man's first care was to secure +himself against his enemies, and that when he had done this he set out +to secure his food supply. "Collier's" called upon the late Professor +Sumner of Yale University, a prize reactionary and Tory of the old +school, to answer me; and Professor Sumner made merry over my statement, +declaring<a name="vol_ii_page_123" id="vol_ii_page_123"></a> that man sought for food long before he was safe from his +enemies. Some years later, when Sumner died, one of his admirers wrote +in the New York "Evening Post" that he had completely overwhelmed me, +and I had acknowledged my defeat by failing to reply—something which +struck me as very funny. It was, of course, possible that Sumner had +overwhelmed me, but to say that I had considered myself overwhelmed was +to attribute to me a degree of modesty of which I was wholly incapable. +As a matter of fact, I had had my usual experience with capitalist +magazines; "Collier's Weekly" had promised to publish my rejoinder to +Sumner, but failed to keep the promise, and finally, when I worried +them, they tucked the answer away in the back part of the paper, among +the advertisements of cigars and toilet soaps.</p> + +<p>Professor Sumner is gone, but he has left behind him an army of pupils, +and I will protect myself against them by phrasing my statement with +extreme care. I do not mean to say that man first secures himself +completely against his enemies, and then goes out to hunt for a meal. Of +course he has to eat while he is countering the moves of his enemies; he +has to eat while he is on the march to battle, or in flight from it. But +ask yourself this question: which would you choose, if you had to +choose—to go a couple of days with nothing to eat, or to have your +throat cut by bandits and your wife and children carried away into +slavery? Certainly you would do your fighting first, and meantime you +would scratch together any food you could. While you were devoting your +energies to putting down civil war, or to making a treaty with other +tribes, or to preparing for a military campaign, you would continue to +get food in the way your ancestors had got it; in other words, your +economic evolution would wait, while your political evolution proceeded. +But when you had succeeded in putting down your enemies, and had a long +period of peace before you, then you would plant some fields, and +domesticate some animals, or perhaps discover some new way of weaving +cloth—and so your industrial life would make progress.</p> + +<p>It is easy to see why Professor Sumner wished to confuse this issue. He +could not deny political evolution, because it had happened. He despised +and feared political democracy, but it was here, and he had to speak +politely to it, as to a tiger that had got into his house. But +industrial democracy<a name="vol_ii_page_124" id="vol_ii_page_124"></a> was a thing that had not yet happened in the +world; it was only a hope and a prophecy, and therefore a prize old Tory +was free to ridicule it. I remember reading somewhere his statement—the +notion that democracy had anything to do with industry, or could in any +way be applied to industry, was a piece of silliness. So, of course, he +sought to demolish my idea that there was a process of evolution in +economic affairs, paralleling the process of political evolution which +had already culminated in democracy.</p> + +<p>Let us consider the process of political evolution, briefly and in its +broad outlines. Take any savage tribe; you find it composed of +individuals who are very much alike. Some are a little stronger than +others, a little more clever, more powerful in battle; but the +difference is slight, and when the tribe chooses someone to lead them, +they might as well choose one man as another. They all have a say in the +tribe councils, both men and women; their "rights" in the tribe are the +same. They are, of course, slaves to ignorance, to degrading +superstition and absurd taboos; but these things apply to everyone +alike, there is no privileged caste, no hereditary inequality.</p> + +<p>But little by little, as the tribe grows in numbers, and in power and +intelligence, as it comes to capture slaves in battle, and to unite with +other tribes, there comes to be an hereditary chieftain and a group of +his leading supporters, his courtiers and henchmen. When the society has +evolved into the stage which we call barbarism, there is a permanent +superior caste; there are hereditary priests, who have in their keeping +the favor of the gods; and there is a subject population of slaves.</p> + +<p>The society moves on into the feudal stage, in which the various grades +and classes are precisely marked off, each with its different functions, +its different privileges and rights and duties. The feudal +principalities and duchies war and struggle among themselves; they are +united by marriage or by conquest, and presently some stronger ruler +brings a great territory under his power, and we have what is called a +kingdom; a society still larger, still more complex in its organization, +and still more rigid in its class distinctions. Take France, under the +ancient régime, and compare a courtier or noble gentleman with a serf; +they are not only different before the law, they are different in the +language they use, in the clothes they wear, in the ideas they hold; +they are<a name="vol_ii_page_125" id="vol_ii_page_125"></a> different even in their bodies, so that the gentleman regards +the serf as an inferior species of creature.</p> + +<p>The kings warred among themselves and emperors arose. The ultimate ideal +in Europe was a political society which should include the whole +continent, and this ideal was several times almost attained. But it is +the rule of history that wherever a large society is built upon the +basis of privilege and enslavement, the ruling classes prove morally and +intellectually unequal to the burden put upon them; they become +corrupted, and their rule becomes intolerable. This happened in Europe, +and there came political revolutions—first in England, which +accomplished it by gradual stages, and then in the French monarchy, and +quite recently in a dozen monarchies and empires, large and small.</p> + +<p>What precisely is this political revolution? Let us consider the case of +France, where the change was sudden, and the issues precisely drawn. +King Louis XIV had said, "I am the state." To a person of our time that +might seem like boasting, but it was merely an assertion of the existing +political fact. King Louis was the state by universal consent, and by +divine authority, as all men believed. The army was his army, the navy +was his navy, and wars, when he made them, were his wars. Everyone in +the state was his subject, and all the property of the state was his +personal, private property, to dispose of as he pleased. The government +officials carried out his will, and members of the nobility held the +land and ruled in his name.</p> + +<p>But now suddenly the people of France overthrew the king, and put him to +death, and drove the nobles into exile; they seized the power of the +French state, and proclaimed themselves equal citizens in the state, +with equal voices in its government and equal rights before the law. So +we call France a republic, and describe this form of society as +political democracy. It is the completion of the process of political +evolution, and you will see that it moves in a sort of spiral; having +completed a circle and got back where it was before, but upon a higher +plane. The citizens of a modern republic are equal before the law, just +as were the members of the savage tribe; but the political organization +is vastly larger, and infinitely more complicated, and every individual +lives his life upon a higher level, because he shares in the benefits of +this more highly organized and more powerful state.<a name="vol_ii_page_126" id="vol_ii_page_126"></a>.</p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LIII" id="CHAPTER_LIII"></a>CHAPTER LIII<br /><br /> +INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Examines the process of evolution in industry and the stage which +it has so far reached.)</p></div> + +<p>And now let us consider the process of industrial evolution. We shall +find it to be exactly the same thing, reproducing the changes in another +field of activity. You may picture two gigantic waves sweeping over the +ocean. In some places the waves are far apart, and in other places they +are closer together; for a time they may mingle, and perhaps their bases +always mingle. It would be easy for a critic to point out how political +affairs play a leading part in industrial evolution, and vice versa; it +would be easy to argue that property rules the political state, or +again, that the main function of the political state is to protect +property. As I have said, man has to fight his enemies, and he has to +seek food, and often he has to do the two things at the same time; but +nevertheless, broadly speaking, we observe two great waves, sweeping +over human society, and most of the time these waves are clearly +separated and easily distinguished.</p> + +<p>Industry in a savage tribe is, like government, simple and uniform; all +the members of the tribe get their living in the same way. One may be a +little more expert as a fisherman, another as a gatherer of cocoanuts, +but the fisherman gathers cocoanuts and the cocoanut-gatherer fishes. In +the days of primitive communism there is little economic strife and +little change; but as slavery comes in, and the private property system, +there begins industrial war—the members of the tribe trade with one +another, and argue over prices, and gradually some get the better of +others, they accumulate slaves and goods, and later on they appropriate +the land to their private use. Of course, the men who do this are often +the rulers of the tribe, and so politics and industry are mixed; but +even assuming that the state never interfered, assuming that the +government allowed business affairs to work themselves out in their own +way, the tendency of competition is always to end in monopoly. The big +fish eat the little fish, the strong gain advantage over the weak, the +rich grow richer, and the poor<a name="vol_ii_page_127" id="vol_ii_page_127"></a> grow relatively poorer. As the amount of +trading increases, and men specialize in the arts of bargaining, we see +again and again how money concentrates in the hands of a few. It does +this, even when the political state tries to prevent it; as, for +example, when the princes and dukes of the Middle Ages would torture the +Jewish money-lenders and take away their treasure, but the Jews never +failed to grow rich again.</p> + +<p>It is when political evolution has completed itself, and a republic has +been set up, that a free field is given to economic forces to work +themselves out to their logical end. We have seen this in the United +States, where we all started pretty much on the same economic level, and +where political tyranny has had little hold. Our civilization is a +civilization of the trader—the business man, as we call him; and we see +how big business absorbs little business, and grows constantly larger +and more powerful. We are familiar with what we call "graft," the use by +business men of the powers of government to get trade advantage for +themselves, and we have a school of old-time thinkers, calling +themselves "Jeffersonian Democrats," who insist that if only there had +never been any government favors, economic equality and democracy would +have endured forever in our country. But it is my opinion that +government has done far more to prevent monopoly and special privilege +in business than to favor it; and nevertheless, monopoly has grown.</p> + +<p>In other words, the tendency toward concentration in business, the +absorption of the small business by the big business, is an irresistible +natural process, which neither can be nor should be hindered. The +condition of competition, whether in politics or in industry, is never a +permanent one, and can never be made permanent; it is a struggle which +automatically brings itself to an end. Large-scale production and +distribution is more economical than small-scale, and big business has +irresistible advantages of credit and permanence over little business. +As we shall presently show, the blind and indiscriminate production of +goods under the competitive system leads to the glutting of markets and +to industrial crises. At such times the weaker concerns are weeded out +and the strong ones take their trade; and as a result, we have the +modern great corporation, the most powerful machine of production yet +devised by man, and which corresponds in every aspect to the monarchy in +political society.<a name="vol_ii_page_128" id="vol_ii_page_128"></a></p> + +<p>We are accustomed to speak of our "captains of industry," our "coal +kings," and "beef barons" and "lords of steel," and we think we are +using metaphors; but the universality of these metaphors points to a +fundamental truth in them. As a matter of fact, our modern captain of +industry fills in the economic world exactly the same functions as were +filled in ancient days by the head of a feudal state. He has won his +power in a similar struggle, and he holds it by similar methods. He +rules over an organization of human beings, arranged, economically +speaking, in grades and classes, with their authorities and privileges +and duties precisely determined, as under the "ancient régime." And just +as King Louis said, "I am the state," so Mr. Armour considers that he is +Armour & Co., and Mr. Morgan considers that he is the house of Morgan, +and that the business exists for him and is controlled by him under +divine authority.</p> + +<p>If I am correct in my analysis of the situation, this process of +industrial evolution is destined to complete itself, as in the case of +the political state. The subject populations of industry are becoming +more and more discontented with their servitude, more and more resentful +of that authority which compels them to labor while others reap the +benefit. They are organizing themselves, and preparing for a social +transformation which will parallel in every detail the revolution by +which our ancestors overthrew the authority of King George III over the +American colonies, and made inhabitants of those colonies no longer +subjects of a king, but free and equal citizens of a republic. I expect +to see a change throughout the world, which will take the great +instruments of production which we call corporations and trusts, out of +the hands of their present private owners, and make them the property, +either of the entire community, or of those who do the work in them. +This change is the "social revolution," and when it has completed +itself, we shall have in that society an Industrial Republic, a form of +business management which constitutes economic democracy.</p> + +<p>The history of the world's political revolutions has been written almost +exclusively by aristocratic or bourgeois historians; that is to say, by +men who, whatever their attitude toward political democracy, have no +conception of industrial democracy, and believe that industrial strife +and enslavement are the normal conditions of life. If, however, you will +read<a name="vol_ii_page_129" id="vol_ii_page_129"></a> Kropotkin's "Great French Revolution," you will be interested to +discover how important a part was played in this revolution by economic +forces. Underneath the political discontent of the merchants and middle +classes lay a vast mass of social discontent of the peasants and +workers. It was the masses of the people who made the revolution, but it +was the middle classes who seized it and turned it to their own ends, +putting down attempts toward economic equality, and confining the +changes, so far as possible, to the political field.</p> + +<p>And everywhere throughout history, if you study revolutions, you find +that same thing happening. You find, for example, Martin Luther fighting +for the right to preach the word of God without consulting the Pope; but +when the peasants of Germany rose and sought to set themselves free from +feudal landlords, Luther turned against them, and called upon the +princes to shoot them down. "The ass needs to be beaten, and the +populace needs to be controlled with a strong hand." The landlords and +propertied classes of England were willing to restrict the power of the +king, and to give the vote to the educated and well-to-do; but from the +time of Jack Cade to our own they shoot down the poor.</p> + +<p>But meantime, the industrial process continues; the modern factory +system brings the workers together in larger and larger groups, and +teaches them the lesson of class consciousness. So the time of the +workers draws near. The first attempt in modern times to accomplish the +social revolution and set up industrial democracy was in the Paris +Commune. When the French empire collapsed, after the war with Germany in +1871, the workers of Paris seized control. They were massacred, some +50,000 of them, and the propertied classes of France established the +present bourgeois republic, which has now become the bulwark of reaction +throughout the Continent of Europe.</p> + +<p>Next came the Russian revolution of 1905, and this was an interesting +illustration of the relation between the two waves of social progress. +Russia was a backward country industrially, and according to theory not +at all prepared for the social revolution. But nowadays the thoughts of +men circulate all over the world, and the exiles from Russia had +absorbed Marxian ideas, and were not prepared to accept a purely +political freedom. So in 1905, after the Japanese war, when the people +rose and forced the Czar to grant a parliament,<a name="vol_ii_page_130" id="vol_ii_page_130"></a> the extremists made an +effort to accomplish the social revolution at the same time. The +peasants began to demand the land, and the workers the factories; +whereupon the capitalists and middle classes, who wanted a parliament, +but did not want Socialism, went over to the side of reaction, and both +the political and social revolutions were crushed.</p> + +<p>But then came the great war, for which Russia with her incompetent +government and her undeveloped industry was unprepared. The strain of it +broke her down long before the other Allies, and in the universal +suffering and ruin the Russian people were again forced to rise. The +political revolution was accomplished, the Czar was imprisoned, and the +Douma reigned supreme. Middle class liberalism throughout the world gave +its blessings to this revolution, and hastened to welcome a new +political democracy to the society of nations. But then occurred what to +orthodox democratic opinion has been the most terrifying spectacle in +human history. The Russian people had been driven too far towards +starvation and despair; the masses had been too embittered, and they +rose again, overthrowing not only their Czar and their grand dukes, but +their capitalists and land-owners. For the first time in history the +social revolution established itself, and the workers were in control of +a great state. Ever since then we have seen exactly what we saw in +Europe from 1789 onward, when the first political republic was +established, and all the monarchies and empires of the world banded +themselves together to stamp it out. We have witnessed a campaign of +war, blockade, intrigue and propaganda against the Soviet government of +Russia, all pretending to be carried on in the name of the Russian +people, and for the purpose of saving them from suffering—but all +obviously based upon one consideration and one alone, the fear that an +effort at industrial self-government might possibly prove to be a +success.</p> + +<p>Whether or not the Soviets will prove permanent, no one can say. But +this much is certain; just as the French revolution sent a thrill around +the world, and planted in the hearts of the common people the wonderful +dream of freedom from kings and ruling classes, just so the Russian +revolution has brought to the working masses the dream of freedom from +masters and landlords. Everywhere in capitalist society this ferment is +working, and in one country after another we<a name="vol_ii_page_131" id="vol_ii_page_131"></a> see the first pangs of the +new birth. Also we see capitalists and landlords, who once found +"democracy," "free speech" and "equality before the law" useful formulas +to break down the power of kings and aristocrats, now repudiating their +old-time beliefs, and going back to the frankest reaction. We see, in +our own "land of the free," the government refusing to reprint the +Declaration of Independence during the war, and arresting men for +quoting from it and circulating it; we even see the Department of +Justice refusing to allow people to reprint the Sermon on the Mount!<a name="vol_ii_page_132" id="vol_ii_page_132"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LIV" id="CHAPTER_LIV"></a>CHAPTER LIV<br /><br /> +THE CLASS STRUGGLE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses history as a battle-ground between ruling and subject +classes, and the method and outcome of this struggle.)</p></div> + +<p>There is a theory of social development, sometimes called the +materialistic interpretation of history, and sometimes the economic +interpretation of history. It is one of the contributions to our thought +which we owe to Karl Marx, and like all the rest of Marxian theory, it +is a subject of embittered controversy, not merely between Socialists +and orthodox economists, but between various schools of revolutionary +doctrine. For my part, I have never been a great hand for doctrine, +whether ancient or modern; I am not much more concerned with what Marx +taught than I am with what St. Paul taught, or what Martin Luther +taught. My advice is to look at life with your own eyes, and to state in +simple language the conclusions of your own thinking.</p> + +<p>Man is an eating animal; he has also been described as a tool-making +animal, and might be described as an ideal-making animal. There is a +tendency on the part of those who specialize in the making of ideals to +repudiate the eating and the tool-making sides of man; which accounts +for the quarrel between the Marxians and the moralists. All through +history you find new efforts of man to develop his emotional and +spiritual nature, and to escape from the humiliating limitations of the +flesh. These efforts have many of them been animated by desperate +sincerity, but none of them have changed the fundamental fact that man +is an eating animal, an animal insufficiently provided by nature against +cold, and with an intense repugnance to having streams of cold water run +down back of his neck. The religious teachers go out with empty purse, +and "take no thought for the morrow"; but the forces of nature press +insistently upon them, and little by little they make compromises, they +take to shelter while they are preaching, they consent to live in +houses, and even to own houses, and to keep a bank account. So they make +terms with the powers of this world, and the powers of<a name="vol_ii_page_133" id="vol_ii_page_133"></a> this world, +which are subtle, and awake to their own interests, find ways to twist +the new doctrine to their ends.</p> + +<p>So the new religion becomes simply another form of the old hypocrisy; +and it comes to us as a breath of fresh air in a room full of corruption +when some one says, "Let us have done with aged shams and false +idealisms. Let us face the facts of life, and admit that man is a +physical animal, and cannot do any sane and constructive thinking until +he has food and shelter provided. Let us look at history with unblinking +eyes, and realize that food and shelter, the material means of life, are +what men have been seeking all through history, and will continue to +seek, until we put production and distribution upon a basis of justice, +instead of a basis of force."</p> + +<p>Such is, as simply as I can phrase it, the materialistic interpretation +of history. Put into its dress of scientific language it reads: the +dominant method of production and exchange in any society determines the +institutions and forms of that society. I do not think I exaggerate in +saying that this formula, applied with judgment and discrimination, is a +key to the understanding of human societies.</p> + +<p>Wherever man has moved into the stage of slavery and private property +there has been some group which has held power and sought to maintain +and increase it. This group has set the standards of behavior and belief +for the community, and if you wish to understand the government and +religion, the manners and morals, the philosophy and literature and art +of that community, the first thing you have to do is to understand the +dominant group and its methods of keeping itself on top. This statement +applies, not merely to those cultural forms which are established and +ordained by the ruling class; it applies equally well to the +revolutionary forms, the behavior and beliefs of those who oppose the +ruling class. For men do not revolt in a vacuum, they revolt against +certain conditions, and the form of their revolt is determined by the +conditions. Take, for example, primitive Christianity, which was +certainly an effort to be unworldly, if ever such an effort was made by +man. But you cannot understand anything about primitive Christianity +unless you see it as a new form of slave revolt against Roman +imperialism and capitalism.</p> + +<p>The theory of the class struggle is the master key to the bewilderments +and confusions of history. Always there is a<a name="vol_ii_page_134" id="vol_ii_page_134"></a> dominant class, holding +the power of the state, and always there are subject classes; and sooner +or later the subject classes begin protesting and struggling for wider +rights. When they think they are strong enough, they attempt a revolt, +and sometimes they succeed. If they do, they write the histories of the +revolt, and their leaders become heroes and statesmen. If they fail, the +histories are written by their oppressors, and the rebels are portrayed +as criminals.</p> + +<p>One of the commonest of popular assumptions is that if the rebels have +justice on their side, they are bound to succeed in the long run; but +this is merely the sentimental nonsense that is made out of history. It +is perfectly possible for a just revolt to be crushed, and to be crushed +again and again; just as it is possible for a child which is ready to be +born to fail to be born, and to perish miserably. The fact that the +Huguenots had most of the virtue and industry and intelligence of France +did not keep them from being slaughtered by Catholic bigots, and +reaction riveted upon the French people for a couple of hundred years. +The fact that the Moors had most of the industry of Spain did not keep +them from being driven into exile by the Inquisition, and the +intellectual life of the Spanish people strangled for three hundred or +four hundred years.</p> + +<p>Some eight hundred years ago our ancestors in England brought a cruel +and despotic king to battle, and conquered him, and on the field of +Runnymede forced him to sign a grant of rights to Englishmen. That +document is known as Magna Carta, or the Great Charter, and everyone who +writes political history today recognizes it as one of the greatest of +man's achievements, the beginning of a process which we hope will bring +freedom and equality before the law to every human being on earth.</p> + +<p>And now we have come to the stage in our industrial affairs, when the +organized workers seek to bring the monarchs of industry into the +council chamber, and force them to sign a similar Great Charter, which +will grant freedom and self-government to the workers. Just as King John +was forced to admit that the power to tax and spend the public revenue +belonged to the people of England, and not to the ruler; just so the +workers will establish the principle that the finances of industry are a +public concern, that the books are to be opened, and prices fixed and +wages paid by the democratic vote of the citizens of industry. If that +change is<a name="vol_ii_page_135" id="vol_ii_page_135"></a> accomplished, the historian of the future will recognize it +as another momentous step in progress; and he will heed the protests of +the lords of industry, that they are being deprived of their freedom to +do business, and of their sacred legal rights to their profits, as +little as he heeded the protests of King John against the "treason" and +"usurpation" and infringement of "divine right" by the rebellious +barons.<a name="vol_ii_page_136" id="vol_ii_page_136"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LV" id="CHAPTER_LV"></a>CHAPTER LV<br /><br /> +THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Shows how wealth is produced in modern society, and the effect of +this system upon the minds of the workers.)</p></div> + +<p>In the beginning man got his living by hunting and fishing. Then he took +to keeping flocks and herds, and later by slow stages he settled down to +agriculture. With the introduction of slavery and the ownership of the +land by ruling classes, there came to be a subject class of workers, who +toiled on the land from dawn to dark, year in and year out, and got, if +they were fortunate, an existence for themselves and their families. +Whether these workers were called slaves or serfs or peasants, whether +their product was taken from them in the form of taxes by the king, or +of rent by the landlord, made no difference; the workers were bound to +the soil, like the beasts with which they lived in intimate contact. +They were drafted into armies, and made to fight for their lords and +masters; they suffered pestilence and famine, fire and slaughter; but +with infinite patience they would rebuild their huts, and dig and plant +again, whether for the old master or for a new one.</p> + +<p>In the early days these workers made their own crude tools and weapons; +but very early there must have been some who specialized in such arts, +and with the growth of towns and communications came a new kind of +labor, based upon a new system. Some enterprising man would buy slaves, +or hire labor, and obtain a supply of raw material, and manufacture +goods to be bartered or sold. He would pay his workers enough to draw +them from the land, and would sell the product for what he could get, +and the difference would be his profit. That was capitalism, and at +first it was a thing of no importance, and the men who engaged in it had +no social standing. But princes and lords needed weapons and supplies +for their armies, and the men who could furnish these things became more +and more necessary, and the states which encouraged them were the ones +which rose to power. Merchants and sea-traders became the intimates of +kings, and by<a name="vol_ii_page_137" id="vol_ii_page_137"></a> the time of the Roman empire, capitalism was a great +world power, dominating the state, using the armies of the state for its +purposes. It went down with the rest of Roman civilization, but in the +Middle Ages it began once more to revive, and by the end of the +eighteenth century the merchants and money lenders of France, with their +retainers, the lawyers and journalists, were powerful enough to take the +control of society.</p> + +<p>Then, in the beginning of the nineteenth century, came the invention of +machinery and of the power process. Capitalism began to grow like a +young giant among pygmies. In the course of a century it has ousted all +other methods of production, and all other forms of social activity. A +hundred years ago the British House of Commons was a parliament of +landlords; today it is a Merchants' and Manufacturers' Association. Out +of the 707 members of the British House of Commons, 361 are members of +the "Federation of British Industries," the labor-smashing organization +of British "big business." And the same is true of every other +parliament and congress in the modern capitalist state. Practically all +the wealth of the world today is produced by the capitalist method, and +distributed under capitalist supervision, and therefore capitalist ideas +prevail in our society, to the practical exclusion of all other ideas. I +have shown in "The Profits of Religion" how these ideas dominate the +modern church, and in "The Brass Check" how they dominate the modern +press. I plan to write two books, to show how they dominate education +and literature.</p> + +<p>A hundred years ago an industry consisted of a half a dozen or a dozen +men, working under the personal supervision of an owner, and using crude +hand tools. Today it consists of a gigantic trust, owning and managing +scores and perhaps hundreds of mills and factories, each employing +thousands of workers. A corporation like the Steel Trust owns enough of +the sources of its raw material to give it practical monopoly; it owns a +fleet of vessels especially designed for ore-carrying; it owns its +private railroads, to deliver the ore to the mills. Through its system +of dummy directorates it has practical control of the main railroads +over which it distributes its products; also of banks and trust +companies and insurance companies, to gather the money of the public to +finance its undertakings. It owns huge office buildings,<a name="vol_ii_page_138" id="vol_ii_page_138"></a> and vast +tracts of land upon which the homes of its workers are built. It has a +private army for the defense of its property—a complete army of +cavalry, infantry and artillery, including a large and highly efficient +secret service department, with a host of informers and spies. It has +newspapers for the purpose of propaganda, and it controls the government +of every village, town and city in which it has important interests. If +you will take the trouble to visit a "steel town," and make inquiries +among public officials, newspaper men, and others who are "on the +inside," you will discover that those in authority consider it necessary +and proper that "steel" should control, and are unable to conceive any +other condition of affairs. If you go to other parts of the country, +where other great industries are located, you find it taken for granted +that "copper" should control, or "lumber," or "coal," or "oil," or +whatever it may be.</p> + +<p>Under the system of large scale capitalism, labor is a commodity, bought +and sold in the market like any other commodity. Some years ago Congress +was requested to pass a law contradicting this fundamental fact of world +capitalism. Congress passed a law, very carefully worded so that no one +could be sure what it meant, and a few years later the Supreme Court +nullified the law. But all through this political and legal controversy +the status of labor remained exactly the same; there was a "labor +market," consisting of those members of the community who, in the +formula of Marx, had nothing but their labor power to sell. These +competed for recognition at the factory gates, and highly skilled +foremen selected those who offered the largest quantity of labor power +for the stated wage.</p> + +<p>So entirely impersonal is this process that there are great industries +in America in which ninety per cent of the common labor force is hired +and fired all over again in the course of a year. These men are put to +work in gangs, under a system which enables one picked man to set the +pace, and compel all the others to keep up with him, under penalty of +being discharged. This process is known as "speeding up," and its +purpose is to obtain from each worker the greatest quantity of energy in +exchange for his daily wage. In the steel industry men work twelve hours +a day for six days in the week, and then finish with a twenty-four-hour +day. If they do not work so long in other industries, it is because +experience has<a name="vol_ii_page_139" id="vol_ii_page_139"></a> proven that the greatest quantity of energy can be +obtained from them in a shorter time. There are very few men who can +stand this pace for long. Those who are not crippled or killed in +accidents are broken down at forty, and all the great corporations +recognize this fact. Their foremen pick out the younger men, and +practically all concerns have an age rule, and never hire men above +forty or forty-five.</p> + +<p>I shall not in this book go into details concerning the fate of the +worker under the profit system. I have written two novels, "The Jungle" +and "King Coal," in which the facts are portrayed in detail, and it +seems the part of common sense to refer the reader to these text-books. +It will suffice here to set forth the main outlines of the situation. In +every capitalist country of the world the masses of the people are +herded into industries, in whose profits they have no share, and in +whose welfare they have no interest. They do not know the people for +whom they work; they have no human relationship, either with their work +or with their employers. They see the surplus of their product drawn off +to maintain a class of idlers, whose activities they know only through +the scandals of the divorce courts and the luxury-love of the moving +picture screen. They compete with one another for jobs, and bid down one +another's wages; and if they attempt to organize and end this +competition, their efforts are broken by newspaper propaganda and +policemen's clubs. At the same time they know that monopoly, open or +secret, prevails in the fixing of prices, and so they find the struggle +to "get ahead" a losing one. In America it used to be possible for the +young and energetic to "go West"; but now the wave of capitalism has +reached the Pacific coast and been thrown back, and there is no more +frontier.</p> + +<p>The man who works on the land has been through all the ages a solitary +man. He is better friends with his horse and his cow than with his +fellow humans. He is brutalized by incessant toil, he lives amid dirt +and the filth of animals, he is, in the words of Edwin Markham:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">"A thing that grieves not and that never hopes,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: .25em;">Stunted and stunned, a brother to the ox."</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>He is a victim of natural forces which he does not understand, and +inevitably therefore he is superstitious. Being alone,<a name="vol_ii_page_140" id="vol_ii_page_140"></a> he is helpless +against his masters, and only utter desperation drives him to revolt.</p> + +<p>But consider the capitalist system—how different the conditions of its +workers! Here they are gathered into city slums, and their wits are +sharpened by continual contact with their fellows. The printing press +makes cheap the spread of information, and the soap-box makes it even +cheaper. Any man with a grievance can shout aloud, and be sure of an +audience to listen, and he can get a great deal said before the company +watchman or the policeman can throttle him. Moreover, the modern worker +is not struggling with drought and tempest and hail; he does not see his +labors wiped out by volcanic eruption or lightning stroke; he is dealing +with machinery, something that he himself has made, and that he fully +understands. If a machine gets out of order, he does not fall down upon +his knees and pray to God to fix it. All the training of his life +teaches him the relationship of cause and effect, the adjustment of +means to ends. So the modern worker, as a necessary consequence of his +daily work, is practical, skeptical, and unsentimental in his +psychology. And what is more, he is making all the rest of society of +the same temperament. He is building roads out into the country, and +building machines to roll over them; he is running telephone lines and +sending newspapers and magazines and moving picture shows to the peasant +and the farmer; so the young peasants and farmers hunger for the city, +and they learn to fix machinery instead of praying to God.</p> + +<p>Such is the psychology of the modern working class; and the supreme +achievement of their sharpened wits is an understanding of the +capitalist process. As a matter of fact they did not make this discovery +for themselves; it was made for them by middle-class men, lawyers and +teachers and writers—Fourier, Owen, Marx, Lassalle. The modern doctrine +is called by various names: Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Bolshevism, +Syndicalism, Collectivism. Later on I shall define these various terms, +and point out the distinctions between them. For the moment I emphasize +the factor they all have in common, and which is fundamental: they wish +to break the power of class ownership and control of the instruments and +means of production; they wish to replace private capitalism by some +system under which the<a name="vol_ii_page_141" id="vol_ii_page_141"></a> instruments and means of production are +collectively owned and operated; and they look to the non-owning class, +the proletarian, as the motive power by which this change is to be +compelled. I shall in future refer to this as the "social revolutionary" +doctrine; taking pains to explain that the word "revolutionary" is to be +divested of its popular meaning of physical violence. It is perfectly +conceivable that the change may be brought about peaceably, and I shall +try to show before long that in modern capitalist states the decision as +to whether it is brought about peaceably or by violence rests with the +present masters of industry.<a name="vol_ii_page_142" id="vol_ii_page_142"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LVI" id="CHAPTER_LVI"></a>CHAPTER LVI<br /><br /> +THE CAPITALIST PROCESS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(How profits are made under the present industrial system and what +becomes of them.)</p></div> + +<p>We have next to examine the structure of the capitalist order, basing +our argument on facts which are admitted by everyone, including the most +ardent defenders of the present system.</p> + +<p>All men have to have certain material things which we describe as goods. +As these goods do not produce themselves, it is necessary that some +should work. The workers must have tools; also they must have access to +the land and the sources of raw materials. These means of production are +owned by some individuals in the community, and this ownership gives +them power to direct the work of the rest. Those who own the land and +the natural sources of wealth we call capitalists, or business men, and +those who do not own these things, or whose share in them is +insignificant, are the proletariat, or working class.</p> + +<p>If you state to the average American that there is a capitalist class +and a proletariat in this country, he will point out that many who are +now members of the capitalist class were originally members of the +proletariat; they have worked hard and saved, and accumulated property. +But this is merely confusing the issue. The fact that some proletarians +turn into capitalists and some capitalists into proletarians is +important to the individuals concerned, but it does not alter the fact +that there are two classes, capitalist and proletarian. Consider, by way +of illustrating, a field with trees growing on it; we have earth, and we +have trees, and the distinction between them is unmistakable. The roots +of the trees go down into the earth, and take up portions of the earth +and turn it into tree. The leaves and the dead branches fall, and in the +course of time are turned once more to earth. There are all sorts of +stages between earth and tree, and between tree and earth; but you would +not therefore say that the word "earth" and the word "tree" are +misnomers.<a name="vol_ii_page_143" id="vol_ii_page_143"></a></p> + +<p>The working men go to the business man and apply for work. The business +man gives them work, and takes their product, and offers it in the +market at a price which allows him a profit above cost. If he can sell +at a profit, he repeats the process, and the worker has a job. If he +cannot sell at a profit, the worker is out of a job. Here and there may +be a benevolent business man who, rather than turn his workers out of a +job, will sell his goods at cost, or even for a short time at a loss; +but if he keeps the factory going simply for the benefit of his workers, +and with no expectation of ever making a profit, that is a form of +charity, and not the common system under which our business is now +carried on.</p> + +<p>So it appears that the worker is dependent for his wages upon the +ability of the business man to make a profit. The worker's life is +inextricably bound up with the profit of the capitalist—no profit for +the capitalist, no life for the worker. The capitalist, going out to +look for markets for his goods, is seeking, not merely profit for +himself, but life for his workers.</p> + +<p>Now, the business man pays a certain percentage of his total receipts +for labor, another percentage for raw materials, another percentage for +his overhead charges, and the rest is profit in various forms, rent to +the landlord, interest to the bondholder, dividends to the stockholder. +All this total sum goes to human individuals, and each has thus a +certain amount of money to spend. They pay it over to other individuals +for goods or services, and so the money keeps circulating, and business +keeps going. That is as deep as the average mind probes into the +process.</p> + +<p>But let us probe a little deeper. It is evident that, in the course of +all this exchanging of goods, some individuals get a larger share than +other individuals. Our government collects an income tax, and thus we +have statistics representing what people are willing to admit about the +share they get. In 1917 it appeared that, speaking roughly, one family +out of six had an income of over $1,000 a year, and one family out of +twelve had an income of over $2,000. But there were 19,000 families +which admitted incomes of over $50,000 a year, and 300 with over +$1,000,000 a year.</p> + +<p>Now the families that get less than a thousand dollars a year obviously +have to spend the greater part of their income upon their immediate +living expenses. But the families that<a name="vol_ii_page_144" id="vol_ii_page_144"></a> get $50,000 a year do not need +to spend everything, and most of them take the greater part of their +income and reinvest it—that is, they spend it upon the creating of new +machinery of production, railroads, mills, factories, office buildings, +the whole elaborate structure of capitalist industry.</p> + +<p>Exactly what proportion of the total product of industry is thus taken +and reinvested no one can say; but this we know, our cities are growing +at an enormous rate, our manufacturing power is increasing by leaps and +bounds, we are perfecting processes which enable one man to do the work +of a hundred men, which increase the product of one man's labor a +hundredfold. All this goes on blindly, automatically; a Niagara of goods +of all sorts is poured out, and we call it "prosperity."</p> + +<p>But then suddenly a strange and bewildering thing happens. All at once, +and without warning, orders fall off, values begin to drop, business +collapses, factories are shut down, and millions of men are thrown out +of jobs. Merchants look at one another with blanched faces; each one has +been counting on paying his bills with the profits he was going to make, +and now his profits are gone, and he can't pay. The newspapers and +magazines keep insisting that it can't be true, that business is going +to revive next week, that prosperity is just ahead. But the factories +stay shut, and the millions of men stay idle.</p> + +<p>This is the condition in which we find ourselves as I write this book. +It has been happening regularly in our history every ten years or so, +ever since America started; we have had a hundred years to reflect upon +it and to probe into the causes of it, and such is business intelligence +in the most enlightened country in the world, you may search the pages +of our newspapers from the first column of millionaire divorce suits to +the last column of "situations wanted," and nowhere can you find one +word to explain this mysterious calamity of "hard times"—how it comes +to happen to our social system, or what could be done to prevent it! To +supply this deficiency in present day thinking is our next task.<a name="vol_ii_page_145" id="vol_ii_page_145"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LVII" id="CHAPTER_LVII"></a>CHAPTER LVII<br /><br /> +HARD TIMES</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Explains why capitalist prosperity is a spasmodic thing, and why +abundant production brings distress instead of plenty.)</p></div> + +<p>Let us picture a small island inhabited by six men. One of these men +fishes, another hunts, another gathers cocoanuts, another raises goats +for clothing, and so on. The six men among them produce by their labor +all the necessities of their lives, and they exchange their products +with one another. The island is productive, and each of the men is free, +and makes his exchanges on equal terms; on that basis the industry of +the island can continue indefinitely, and there will never be any +trouble. There may sometimes be over-production, but it will not cause +anyone to starve. If the fisherman is unusually lucky one day, he will +be able to take a vacation for a few days, living on his fish and the +products he exchanges for his fish. For the sake of convenience in +future reference, I will describe this happy island as a "free" society; +meaning that each of the members of this society has access on equal +terms to the sources of wealth, and each owns the product of his own +labor, without paying tribute to any one else for the right to labor, or +to exchange his products.</p> + +<p>But now let us suppose that one of the men on the island is strong and +aggressive; he takes a club and knocks down the other five men, and +compels them to sign a piece of paper agreeing that hereafter he is the +president of the land development company of the island, the chief +stockholder in the goat-raising company, and owner of the fishing +concession and the cocoanut grove; also, that hereafter goods shall not +be bartered in kind, but shall be exchanged for money, and that he is +the banker, and also the government, with the right to issue money. In +this society you will find that the real work, the actually productive +work, is done by five men, instead of by six, and these five do not get +the full value of their labor. The fisherman will fish, but his product +will no longer belong to himself; he will get part of it as wages, while +the "business man" takes charge of the balance. So<a name="vol_ii_page_146" id="vol_ii_page_146"></a> when there is a +lucky day, there will be prosperity in the fishing industry, but this +prosperity will not benefit the fisherman; he will have only his wage, +and when he has caught too many fish, he will not have a few days' +vacation, but will be out of a job.</p> + +<p>And exactly the same thing will happen to the goat-herd. He will +probably have work all the year round, because goats have to be tended, +but he will get barely enough to keep him alive, and the surplus skins +and milk will go to the owner of the no-longer-happy island. Perhaps it +will occur to the owner that the man who raises cocoanuts might also +keep an eye on the goats, and so the goat-herd will be permanently out +of a job, and will turn into what is called a tramp, or vagrant. +Inasmuch as everything to eat on the island belongs to the owner, the +ex-goat-herd will be tempted to become a criminal, and so it will be +necessary for the owner to arm the cocoanut man with a club and make him +into a policeman; or perhaps he will organize the fisherman and the +hunter into a militia for the preservation of law and order. They will +be glad to serve him, because, owing to the extreme productivity of the +island, they will be out of jobs a great part of the time, and but for +the generosity of the business man, would have no way of earning a +living.</p> + +<p>But suppose that the cocoanut man should invent a machine for gathering +a year's supply of nuts in a week; suppose the fisherman should devise a +scheme to fill his boat with fish in a few minutes; and suppose that as +a result of these inventions the business man got so rich that he moved +to Paris, and no longer saw his workers, or even knew their names. Under +these conditions you can see that overproduction and unemployment might +increase on the island; and also the business man might seem less human +and lovable to his wage slaves, and might need a larger police force. It +might even happen that he would discover the need of a propaganda +department, in order to keep his police force loyal, and a secret +service to make sure that agitators did not get into the schools.</p> + +<p>The five islanders, having filled all the barns and storehouses, would +be turned out to starve; and when they asked the reason, they would be +told it was because they had produced a surplus of food. This may sound +grotesque, but it is what is being said to 5,000,000 men in America as I +write. There are clothing-workers who are going about in<a name="vol_ii_page_147" id="vol_ii_page_147"></a> rags, and they +are told it is because they have produced too much clothing. There are +shoe-workers whose shoes are falling off their feet, and they are told +it is because they have produced too many shoes. There are carpenters +who have no homes, and they are told that a great many homes are needed, +but unfortunately it doesn't pay the builders to go ahead just now. This +may sound like a caricature, but it happens to be the most prominent +single fact in the consciousness of 5,000,000 Americans at the close of +the year 1921. No wonder they are discontented with the present order.</p> + +<p>The solution of the mystery is so simple that the 5,000,000 unemployed +cannot be kept permanently from understanding it. The reason the five +men on the island are starving is because one man owns the island and +the others own nothing. If the island were community property, the five +men would each own a share of the contents of the barns and storehouses, +and would not be starving. If the 100,000,000 people of America owned +the productive machinery of America, then instantly the unemployment +crisis would pass like an evil dream. The farm-workers who need shoes +would exchange their food with the starving shoe-workers, and the +starving shoe-workers would have jobs. They would want clothing, and so +the clothing-makers would start to work; and so on all the way down the +line. There is only one thing necessary to make this possible, and that +is the thing which we have agreed to call the social revolution.<a name="vol_ii_page_148" id="vol_ii_page_148"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LVIII" id="CHAPTER_LVIII"></a>CHAPTER LVIII<br /><br /> +THE IRON RING</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Analyzes further the profit system, which strangles production, +and makes true prosperity impossible.)</p></div> + +<p>We have seen that in an exploiting society there is a surplus which is +taken by the exploiter; and that under the modern system this surplus +must be sold at a profit before production can continue. The vital fact +in such a society is that the worker has not the money to buy back all +that he produces; therefore it is inevitable that a surplus product +should accumulate. When this happens, production must be cut down, and +during that period the worker is without a job, and without means of +living. The fact that he needs the product does not help him; the point +is that he has not the money to buy it. In such a society the productive +machinery is never used to the full. The machinery is controlled by a +profit-seeking interest, seeking an opportunity to make sales, and +restricting production according to the prospect of sales. So the actual +product bears no relationship to the possible product, and people who +live in an exploiting society can form no conception of true prosperity.</p> + +<p>For, you see, the market is limited by the competitive wage system. We +have seen that in our own rich, prosperous country only one family out +of six has more than $1,000 a year income; only one family out of twelve +has $2,000 a year. It does not make any difference that the warehouses +are bursting with goods; a family constitutes a market of so many +dollars a year, and then, so far as the profit system is concerned, that +family is non-existent; that family stops consuming, and the productive +machinery is halted to that extent.</p> + +<p>I have been accustomed to portray the profit system under the simile of +an iron ring riveted about the body of a baby. That ring would cause the +baby some discomfort at the beginning, but it would not be serious, and +the baby would get used to it. But as the baby grew the trouble caused +by the ring would increase, and finally there would come a time<a name="vol_ii_page_149" id="vol_ii_page_149"></a> when +the baby would be suffering from a whole complication of troubles, and +for each of these troubles there would be but one remedy—break the +ring. Does the baby cry all the time? Break the ring! Is its digestion +defective? Break the ring! Is it threatened with convulsions or with +blood poisoning? Break the ring!</p> + +<p>Here is our industrial society, growing at a rate never equalled by any +human baby; and here is this iron ring riveted about its middle. Here is +poverty, here is unemployment, here is graft, here is crime, here is war +and plague and famine; and for all these evils there is but one cause, +and but one remedy. Break the ring! Set production free from the +strangulation of the profit system.</p> + +<p>I will admit that there may have been a time in the history of the +social infant when this ring was necessary. I admit that if the great +industrial machine was to be constructed, it was necessary that the mass +of the people should consume only part of what they produced, and should +allow the balance to be reinvested as capital. But now it has been done, +and the process is complete. We have a machine capable of producing many +times more than we can consume; shall we still go on building that +machine? Shall we go on starving ourselves, to save the money, to +multiply over and over again the products, in order that we may be +thrown out of work, and be starved even more completely?</p> + +<p>A few generations ago we had in colonial America a society that in part +at least was "free." In that society everybody got the necessities of +life. They did not have the modern Sunday supplement and the moving +picture show, but they had bread and meat and good substantial clothing, +and furniture so well made that we still preserve it. The children in +those days grew up to be strong and sturdy men and women, who would have +seen nothing to envy in the bodies or minds of the slum population of +New York and Chicago. In short, they had all the true necessities of +life; and yet their work was done by hand, the power process was unknown +and undreamed of.</p> + +<p>Now comes modern machinery, and multiplies the productive power of the +hand laborer by five, by ten, sometimes by a hundred. Here, for example, +is the "Appeal to Reason" selling millions of cheap books for ten cents +apiece, and making a profit on it; installing a gigantic press which +takes<a name="vol_ii_page_150" id="vol_ii_page_150"></a> paper, sheet after sheet, prints 128 pages of a book at one +impression, and folds and stitches and binds the books, all in one +process, and turns them out complete at the rate of 10,000 copies per +hour. Here is a factory which turns out 100,000 automobiles a month. +Here is a mill which turns out many millions of yards of cloth a month. +If our colonial ancestors had been told about these marvels, they would +have said instantly: "Then, of course, everybody in that society will +have all the books they want, and all the clothing they want, and all +the automobiles. Everybody in that society will have five or ten or one +hundred times as much goods as we have."</p> + +<p>Imagine the bewilderment of our colonial ancestor if he had been told: +"The majority of the people in that society will not have so much of the +real necessities of life as you have. They will have a few cheap +trinkets, designed to tickle their senses; they will have cheap +newspapers, carefully contrived to keep their minds vacant and to keep +them contented with their lot; they will have moving picture shows +constructed for the same purpose; but all their material things will be +flimsy, put together for show and not for permanence; their food will be +adulterated, their clothing will be shoddy, everything they have will be +made, not for their service, but for the profit of some one who lives by +selling to them. The average wage earned by those who do the work of +this new machine civilization will be less than half the amount +necessary to purchase the necessities of a decent life, and one-tenth of +the total population will be living in such poverty that they are unable +to maintain physical fitness, or to rear their children into full sized +men and women."<a name="vol_ii_page_151" id="vol_ii_page_151"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LIX" id="CHAPTER_LIX"></a>CHAPTER LIX<br /><br /> +FOREIGN MARKETS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Considers the efforts of capitalism to save itself by marketing +its surplus products abroad, and what results from these efforts.)</p></div> + +<p>If our analysis of present-day society is correct, we have the enormous +populations of the modern industrial countries, living always on the +verge of starvation, their chance for survival depending at all times +upon the ability of their employers to find a profitable market for a +surplus of goods. At first the employer seeks that market at home; but +when the home markets are glutted, he goes abroad; and so develops the +phenomenon of foreign trade and rivalry for foreign trade, as the basic +fact of capitalism, and the fundamental cause of modern war.</p> + +<p>Let us get clear a simple distinction concerning foreign trade. There is +a kind of trade which is normal, and would thrive in a "free" society. +In the United States we can produce nearly all the necessities of life, +but there are a few which we cannot produce—rubber, for example, and +bananas, and good music. These things we wish to import. We buy them +from other countries, and incur a debt, which we pay with products which +the other countries need from us; wheat, for example, and copper, and +moving pictures with cowboys in them. This is equal exchange, and a +natural phenomenon. A "free" society would produce such surplus goods as +were necessary to procure the foreign products that it desired. When it +had produced that much, the workers would stop and take a vacation until +they wanted more foreign products.</p> + +<p>But under capitalism we have an entirely different condition—we produce +a surplus of goods which we <i>have</i> to sell in order to keep our +factories running, and to keep our working population from starving. And +note that it does not help us to get back an equal quantity of foreign +goods in exchange. We must have what we call "a favorable balance"; that +is, we must have other people going into debt to us, so<a name="vol_ii_page_152" id="vol_ii_page_152"></a> that we can be +continually shipping out more goods than we take back; continually +piling up credits which we can "negotiate," or turn into cash, so that +we can go on and repeat the process of making more goods, selling them +for more profits, and putting the surplus into the form of more +machinery, to make still more goods and still more profits.</p> + +<p>And then, after a while, we come upon this embarrassing phenomenon; +nations which buy and do not sell must either do it by sending us gold, +or by our giving them credit. The sending of gold cannot go on +indefinitely, because then we should have all the gold, and if other +nations had none that would destroy their credit. On the other hand, +business cannot be done by credit indefinitely; for the very essence of +credit is a promise to pay, and payment can only be made in goods, and +how can we take the goods without ruining our own industry?</p> + +<p>Fifteen years ago I pointed this out in a book. The argument was +irrefutable, and the conclusion inescapable, but the few critics who +noted it repeated their usual formula about "dreamers and theorists." +Now, however, the business mills have ground on, and what was theory has +become fact before our eyes. We have trusted the nations of Europe for +some $10,000,000,000 worth of goods, and they are powerless to pay, and +if they did pay, they would bankrupt American industry. France wishes to +collect an enormous indemnity from Germany, but nobody can figure out +how this indemnity can be paid without ruining French industry. The +French have demanded coal from Germany, and have got more than they can +use, and are "dumping" it in Belgium and Holland, with the result that +the British coal industry is ruined. The French clamor that the Germans +must pay for the destruction they wrought in Northern France, and the +Germans offer to send German workmen to rebuild the ruined towns; but +the French denounce this as an insult—it would deprive French +workingmen of their jobs! So I might continue for pages, pointing out +the manifold absurdities which result from a system of industry for the +profit of a few, instead of for the use of all.</p> + +<p>Ever since I first began to read the newspapers, some twenty-five or +thirty years ago, all our political life has been nothing but the +convulsions of a social body tortured by the constricting ring of the +profit system. Everywhere one group<a name="vol_ii_page_153" id="vol_ii_page_153"></a> struggling for advantage over +another group, and politicians engaged in playing one interest against +another interest! My boyhood recollections of public life consist of +campaign slogans having to do with the tariff: "production and +prosperity," "reciprocity," "the full dinner pail," "the foreigner pays +the tax," etc.</p> + +<p>The workingman, under the profit system, is like a man pounding away at +a pump. He can get a thin trickle of water from the spout of the pump if +he works hard enough, but in order to get it he has to supply ten times +as much to some one who has tapped the pipe. But the tapping has been +done underground, where the workingman cannot see it. All the workingman +knows is that there is no job for him if the products of "cheap foreign +labor" are allowed to be "dumped" on the American market. That is +obvious, and so he votes for a tax on foreign imports, high enough to +enable his own employer to market at a profit. He does not realize that +he is thus raising the price of everything that he buys, and so leaving +himself worse off than he was before.</p> + +<p>All governments are delighted with this tariff device, because they are +thus enabled to get money from the public without the public's knowing +it. "The foreigner pays the tax," we are told, and as a result of this +arrangement the steel trust just before the war was selling its product +at a high price to the American people, and taking its surplus abroad +and selling it to the foreigner at half the domestic price. And we see +this same thing in every line of manufacture, and all over the world. We +see one nation after another withdrawing itself as a market for +manufactured products, and entering the lists as a marketer. One more +nation now able to fill all its own needs, and going out hungrily to +look for foreign customers, adding to the glut of the world's +manufactured products and the ferocity of international competition!</p> + +<p>At the close of the Civil War the total exports of the United States +averaged approximately $300,000,000, and the total imports were about +the same. In 1892 the exports first touched $1,000,000,000, while the +imports were about nine-tenths of that sum. In the year 1913 the exports +were nearly $2,500,000,000, while the imports were $600,000,000 less; +and in the year 1920 our exports were over $8,000,000,000 and our +imports a little over $5,000,000,000! So we have a "favorable<a name="vol_ii_page_154" id="vol_ii_page_154"></a> balance" +of almost $3,000,000,000 a year—and as a result we are on the verge of +ruin!</p> + +<p>This "iron ring" of overproduction and lack of market exercises upon our +industrial body a steady pressure, a slow strangling. But because the +body is in convulsions, struggling to break the ring, the pressure of +the ring is worse at some times than at others. We have periods of what +we call "prosperity," followed by periods of panic and hard times. You +must understand that only a small part of our business is done by means +of cash payments, whether in gold or silver or paper money. Close to 99% +of our business is done by means of credit, and this introduces into the +process a psychological factor. The business man expects certain +profits, and he capitalizes these expectations. Business booms, because +everybody believes everybody else's promises; credit expands like a huge +balloon, with the breath of everybody's enthusiasm. But meantime real +business, the real market, remains just what it was before; it cannot +increase, because of the iron ring which restricts the buying power of +the mass of the people by the competitive wage. So presently the time +comes when somebody realizes that he has over-capitalized his hopes; he +curtails his orders, he calls in his money, and the impulse thus started +precipitates a crash in the whole business world. We had such a crash in +1907, and I remember a Wall Street man explaining it in a magazine +article entitled, "Somebody Asked for a Dollar."</p> + +<p>We learned one lesson by that panic; at least, the big financial men +learned it, and had Congress pass what is called the "Federal Reserve +Act," a provision whereby in time of need the government issues +practically unlimited credit to banks. This, of course, is fine for the +banks; it puts the credit of everybody else behind them, and all they +have to do is to stop lending money—except to the big insiders—and sit +back and wait, while the little men go to the wall, and the mass of us +live on our savings or starve. We saw this happen in the year 1920, and +for the first time we had "hard times" without having a financial panic. +But instead we see prices staying high—because the banks have issued so +much paper money and bank credits.<a name="vol_ii_page_155" id="vol_ii_page_155"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LX" id="CHAPTER_LX"></a>CHAPTER LX<br /><br /> +CAPITALIST WAR</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Shows how the competition for foreign markets leads nations +automatically into war.)</p></div> + +<p>In a discussion of the world's economic situation, published in 1906, +the writer portrayed the ruling class of Germany as sitting in front of +a thermometer, watching the mercury rising, and knowing that when it +reached the top, the thermometer would break. This thermometer was the +German class system of government, and the mercury was the Socialist +vote. In 1870 the vote was 30,000, in 1884 it was 549,000, in 1893 it +was 1,876,000, in 1903 it was 3,008,000, in 1907 it was 3,250,000, in +1911 it was 4,250,000. Writing between 1906 and 1913, I again and again +pointed out that this increase was the symptom of social discontent in +Germany, caused by the overproduction of invested capital throughout the +world, and the intensification of the competition for world markets. I +pointed out that a slight increase in the vote would be sufficient to +transfer to the working class of Germany the political power of the +German state; and I said that the ruling class of Germany would never +permit that to happen—when it was ready to happen Germany would go to +war, to seize the trade privileges of some other nation.</p> + +<p>There was a time when wars were caused by national and racial hatreds. +There are still enough of these venerable prejudices left in the world, +but no student of the subject would deny that the main source of modern +wars is commercial rivalry. In 1917 we sent Eugene V. Debs to prison for +declaring that the late world war was a war of capitalist greed. But two +years later President Wilson, who had waged the war, declared in a +public speech that everybody knew it had been a war of commercial +rivalries.</p> + +<p>The aims of modern war-makers are two. First, capitalism must have raw +materials, including coal and oil, the sources of power, and gold and +silver, the bases of credit. Parts of the world which are so unfortunate +as to be rich in these substances become the bone of contention between +rival financial groups, organized as nations. Some sarcastic writer has +defined a "backward" nation as one which has gold mines and no navy. We +are horrified to read of the<a name="vol_ii_page_156" id="vol_ii_page_156"></a> wars of the French monarchs, caused by the +jealous quarrels of mistresses; but in 1905 we saw Russia and Japan go +to war and waste a million lives because certain Russian grand dukes had +bribed certain Chinese mandarins and obtained concessions of timber on +the Yalu River. We now observe France and Germany vowed to undying hate +because of iron mines in Lorraine, and the efforts of France to take the +coal mines of Silesia from Germany, and give them to Poland, which is +another name for French capitalism.</p> + +<p>The other end sought by the war-makers is markets for manufactured +products, and control of trade routes, coaling stations and cables +necessary to the building up of foreign trade. England has been +"mistress of the seas" for some 300 years, which meant that her traders +had obtained most of these advantages. But then came Germany, with her +newly developed commercialism, shoving her rival out of the way. The +Englishman was easy-going; he liked to play cricket, and stop and drink +tea every afternoon. But the German worked all day and part of the +night; he trained himself as a specialist, he studied the needs of his +customers—all of which to the Englishman was "unfair" competition. But +here were the populations of the crowded slums, dependent for their +weekly wage and their daily bread upon the ability of the factories to +go on turning out products! Here was the ever-blackening shadow of +unemployment, the mutterings of social discontent, the agitators on the +soap-boxes, the workers listening to them with more and more eager +attention, and the journalists and politicians and bankers watching this +phenomenon with a ghastly fear.</p> + +<p>So came the great war. Social discontent was forgotten over night, and +England and France plunged in to down their hated rival, once and for +all time. Now they have succeeded: Germany's ships have been taken from +her, and likewise her cables and coaling stations; the Berlin-Bagdad +Railroad is a forgotten dream; the British sit in Constantinople, and +the traffic goes by sea. American capitalism wakes up, and rubs its eyes +after a debauch of Presbyterian idealism, and discovers that it has paid +out some $20,000,000,000, in order to confer all these privileges and +advantages upon its rivals!</p> + +<p>Ever since I can remember the world, there have been peace societies; I +look back in history and discover that ever since there have been wars, +there have been prophets declaiming<a name="vol_ii_page_157" id="vol_ii_page_157"></a> against them in the name of +humanity and God. As I write, there is a great world conference on +disarmament in session in Washington, and all good Americans hope that +war is to be ended and permanent peace made safe. All that I can do at +this juncture is to point out the fundamental and all-controlling fact +of present-day economics: that for the ruling class of any country to +agree to disarmament and the abolition of war, is for that class to sign +its own death warrant and cut its own throat. American capitalism can +survive on this earth only by strangling and destroying Japanese +capitalism and British capitalism, and doing it before long. The +far-sighted capitalists on both sides know that, and are making their +preparations accordingly.</p> + +<p>What the members of the peace societies and the diplomats of the +disarmament conferences do is to cut off the branches of the tree of +war. They leave the roots untouched, and then, when the tree continues +to thrive, they are astounded. I conclude this chapter with a concrete +illustration, cut from my morning newspaper. We went to war against +German militarism, and to make the world safe for democracy—meaning +thereby capitalist commercialism. We commanded the German people to +"beat their swords into plough-shares"; that is, to set their Krupp +factories to making tools of peace; and they did so. We saddled them +with an enormous indemnity, making them our serfs for a generation or +two, and compelling them to hasten out into the world markets, to sell +their goods and raise gold to pay us. And now, how does their behavior +strike us? Do we praise their industry, and fidelity to their +obligations? Here are the headlines of a news despatch, published by the +Los Angeles Times on December 10, 1921, at the top of the front page, +right hand column, the most conspicuous position in the paper. Read it, +and understand the sources of modern war!</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p class="c"><i>NEW ATTACK BY BERLIN</i><br /> + +————<br /> + +DUMPING GOODS BY WHOLESALE<br /> + +————<br /> + +Cheap German Trash Puts Thousands of Americans Out of Employment<br /> + +————<br /> +Glove Plants Shut Down and Potash Industry Killed by Teuton +Intrigue</p> +</div> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_158" id="vol_ii_page_158"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXI" id="CHAPTER_LXI"></a>CHAPTER LXI<br /><br /> +THE POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCTION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Shows how much wealth we could produce if we tried, and how we +proved it when we had to.)</p></div> + +<p>One of the commonest arguments in defense of the present business system +runs as follows: The amount of money which is paid to labor is greatly +in excess of the amount which is paid to capital. Suppose that tomorrow +you were to abolish all dividends and profits, and divide the money up +among the wage workers, how much would each one get? The sum is figured +for some big industry, and it is shown that each worker would get one or +two hundred dollars additional per year. Obviously, this would not bring +the millennium; it would hardly be worth while to take the risk of +reducing production in order to gain so small a result.</p> + +<p>But now we are in position to realize the fallacy of such an argument. +The tax which capital levies upon labor is not the amount which capital +takes for itself, but the amount which it prevents labor from producing. +The real injury of the profit system is not that it pays so large a +reward to a ruling class; it is the "iron ring" which it fastens about +industry, barring the workers from access to the machinery of production +except when the product can be sold for a profit. Labor pays an enormous +reward to the business man for his management of industry, but it would +pay labor to reward the business man even more highly, if only he would +take his goods in kind, and would permit labor, after this tax is paid, +to go on making those things which labor itself so desperately needs.</p> + +<p>But, you see, the business man does not take his goods in kind. The +owner of a great automobile factory may make for himself one automobile +or a score of automobiles, but he quickly comes to a limit where he has +no use for any more, and what he wants is to sell automobiles and "make +money." He does not permit his workers to make automobiles for +themselves, or for any one else. He reserves the product of the factory +for himself, and when he can<a name="vol_ii_page_159" id="vol_ii_page_159"></a> no longer sell automobiles at a profit, he +shuts the workers out and automobile-making comes to an end in that +community. Thus it appears that the "iron ring" which strangles the +income of labor, strangles equally the income of capital. It paralyzes +the whole social body, and so limits production that we can form no +conception of what prosperity might and ought to be.</p> + +<p>Consider the situation before the war. We were all of us at work under +the competitive system, and with the exception of a few parasites, +everybody was occupied pretty close to the limit of his energy. If any +one had said that it would be possible for our community to pitch in and +double or treble our output, you would have laughed at him. But suddenly +we found ourselves at war, and in need of a great increase in output, +and we resolved one and all to achieve this end. We did not waste any +time in theoretical discussions about the rights of private capital, or +the dangers of bureaucracy and the destruction of initiative. Our +government stepped in and took control; it took the railroads and +systematized them, it took the big factories and told them exactly what +to make, it took the raw materials and allotted them, where they were +needed, it fixed the prices of labor, and ordered millions of men to +this or that place, to this or that occupation. It even seized the +foodstuffs and directed what people should eat. In a thousand ways it +suppressed competition and replaced it by order and system. And what was +the result?</p> + +<p>We took five million of our young men, the very cream of our industrial +force, and withdrew them from all productive activities; we put them +into uniforms, and put them through a training which meant that they +were eating more food and wearing more clothing and consuming more goods +than nine-tenths of them had ever done in their lives before. We built +camps for them, and supplied them with all kinds of costly products of +labor, such as guns and cartridges, automobiles and airplanes. We +treated two million of them to an expensive trip to Europe, and there we +set them to work burning up and destroying the products of industry, to +the value of many billions of dollars. And not only did we supply our +own armies, we supplied the armies of all our allies. We built millions +of dollars worth of ships, and we sent over to Europe, whether by +private business or by government loans,<a name="vol_ii_page_160" id="vol_ii_page_160"></a> some $10,000,000,000 worth of +goods—more than ten years of our exports before the war.</p> + +<p>All the labor necessary to produce all this wealth had to be withdrawn +from industry, so far as concerned our domestic uses and needs. It would +not be too much to say that from domestic industry we withdrew a total +of ten million of our most capable labor force. I think it would be +reasonable to say that two-thirds of our productive energies went to war +purposes, and only one-third was available for home use. And yet, we did +it without a particle of real suffering. Many of us worked hard, but few +of us worked harder than usual. Most of us got along with less wheat and +sugar, but nobody starved, nobody really suffered ill health, and our +poor made higher wages and had better food than ever in their lives +before. If this argument is sound, it proves that our productive +machinery is capable, when properly organized and directed, of producing +three times the common necessities of our population. Assuming that our +average working day is nine hours, we could produce what we at present +consume by three hours of intelligently directed work per day.</p> + +<p>Let us look at the matter from another angle. Just at present the hero +of the American business man is Herbert Hoover; and Mr. Hoover recently +appointed a committee, not of Socialists and "Utopians," but of +engineering experts, to make a study of American productive methods. The +report showed that American industry was only thirty-five or forty per +cent efficient. Incidentally, this "Committee on Waste" assessed, in the +case of the building industry, sixty-five per cent of the blame against +management and only twenty-one per cent against labor; in six +fundamental industries it assessed fifty per cent of the blame against +management and less than twenty-five per cent against labor. Fifteen +years ago a professor of engineering, Sidney A. Reeve by name, made an +elaborate study of the wastes involved in our haphazard and planless +industrial methods, and embodied his findings in a book, "The Cost of +Competition." His conclusion was that of the total amount of energy +expended in America, more than seventy per cent was wasted. We were +doing one hundred per cent of work and getting thirty per cent of +results. If we would get one hundred per cent of results, we should +produce three and one-third times as much wealth,<a name="vol_ii_page_161" id="vol_ii_page_161"></a> and the income of our +workers would be increased one or two thousand dollars a year.</p> + +<p>Robert Blatchford in his book, "Merrie England," has a saying to the +effect that it makes all the difference, when half a dozen men go out to +catch a horse, whether they spend their time catching the horse or +keeping one another from catching the horse. Our next task will be to +point out a few of the ways in which good, honest American business men +and workingmen, laboring as intelligently and conscientiously as they +know how, waste their energies in keeping one another from producing +goods.<a name="vol_ii_page_162" id="vol_ii_page_162"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXII" id="CHAPTER_LXII"></a>CHAPTER LXII<br /><br /> +THE COST OF COMPETITION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the losses of friction in our productive machine, those +which are obvious and those which are hidden.)</p></div> + +<p>The United States government is by far the largest single business +enterprise in the United States; and a study of congressional +appropriations in 1920, made by the United States Bureau of Standards, +reveals the fact that ninety-three per cent of the total income of the +government went to paying for past wars or preparing for future wars. We +have shown that modern war is a product of the profit system, and if +civilized nations would put their industry upon a co-operative basis, +they could forget the very idea of war, and we should then receive +fourteen times as much benefit from our government as we receive at +present; we should have fourteen times as good roads, fourteen times as +many schools, fourteen times as prompt a postoffice and fourteen times +as efficient a Congress. What it would mean to industry to abolish war +is something wholly beyond the power of our imagination to conceive; for +along with ninety-three per cent of our government money there goes into +military preparation the vast bulk of our intellectual energy and +inventive genius, our moral and emotional equipment.</p> + +<p>Next, strikes and the losses incidental to strikes, and the costs of +preparing against strikes. This includes, not merely the actual loss of +working time, it includes police and militia, private armies of gunmen, +and great secret service agencies, whose total income runs up into +hundreds of millions of dollars per year. Industrial warfare is simply +the method by which capitalists and workers determine the division of +the product of industry; as if two men should co-operate in raising +poultry, and then fall to quarrelling over the ownership of the eggs, +and settle the matter by throwing the eggs at each other's heads.</p> + +<p>Next, bankruptcy. Statistics show that regularly some ten per cent of +our business enterprises fail every year. Take any block occupied by +little business men, grocers and haberdashers<a name="vol_ii_page_163" id="vol_ii_page_163"></a> and "notions," and you +will see that they are always changing. Each change represents a human +tragedy, and the total is a frightful waste of human energy; it happens +because we can think of no better way to distribute goods than to go +through the work of setting up a business, and then discover that it +cannot succeed because the neighborhood is already overstocked with that +kind of goods.</p> + +<p>Next, fires which are a result of bankruptcy. You may laugh, perhaps, +thinking that I am making a joke; but every little man who fails in +business knows that he has a choice of going down in the social scale, +or of setting fire to his stock some night, and having a big insurance +company set him on his feet again. The result is that a certain +percentage of bankrupts do regularly set fire to their stores. Some +fifteen years ago there was published in "Collier's Weekly" a study of +the costs to society of incendiary fires. The Fire Underwriters' +Association estimated the amount as a quarter of a billion dollars a +year; and all this cost, you understand, is paid out of the pockets of +those who insure their homes and their stores, and do not burn them +down.</p> + +<p>From this follows the costs of insurance, and the whole insurance +industry, which is inevitable under the profit system, but is entire +waste so far as true production is concerned. Big enterprises like the +Steel Trust do not carry insurance, and neither does the United States +Postoffice. They are wealthy enough to stand their own losses. A +national co-operative enterprise would be in the same position, and the +whole business of collecting money for insurance and keeping records and +carrying on lawsuits would be forgotten.</p> + +<p>Next, advertising. It would be no exaggeration to say that seventy per +cent of the material published in American newspapers and magazines +today is pure waste; and therefore seventy per cent of the labor of all +the people who cut down forests and manufacture and transport paper and +set up type and print and distribute publications is wasted. There is, +of course, a small percentage of advertising that is useful, but most of +it is boasting and falsehood, and even where it tells the truth it +simply represents the effort of a merchant to persuade you to buy in his +store instead of in a rival store—an achievement which is profitable to +the merchant, but utterly useless to society as a whole.</p> + +<p>This same statement applies to all traveling salesmen, and<a name="vol_ii_page_164" id="vol_ii_page_164"></a> to a great +percentage of middlemen. It applies also to a great part of delivery +service. If you live in a crowded part of any city, you see a dozen milk +wagons pass your door every morning, doing the work which could be done +exactly as well by one. That is only one case out of a thousand I might +name.</p> + +<p>Next, crime. I have already discussed the crime of arson, and I might +discuss the crimes of pocket-picking, burglary, forgery, and a hundred +others in the same way. I am aware of the fact that there may be a few +born criminals; there may be a few congenital cheats, whom we should +have to put in hospitals. But we have only to consult the crime records, +during the war and after the war, in order to see that when jobs are +hunting men there are few criminals, and when men are hunting jobs there +are many criminals. I have no figures as to the cost of administering +justice in the United States—policemen, courts and jails—but it must +be hundreds of millions of dollars every year.</p> + +<p>I have discussed at great length the suppression of the productive power +of society. I should not fail to mention the suppression of the +inventive power of society, a factor less obvious, but probably in the +long run even greater. Every one familiar with the inside of a big +industry knows that hundreds and even thousands of useful processes are +entirely suppressed, because it would not pay one particular concern to +stand the expense of the changes involved. You know how, during the war, +our government brought all the makers of engines together and perfected +in triumph a "Liberty motor." But now we have gone back to private +interest and competition, and each concern is jealously engaged in +guarding its own secrets, and depriving industry as a whole of the +benefit of everything that it learns. Each is spying upon the others, +stealing the secrets of the others, stealing likewise from those who +invent new ideas—and thus discouraging them from inventing any more.</p> + +<p>I use this word "discourage," and I might write a chapter upon it. What +human imagination can conceive the amount of social energy that is lost +because of the factor of discouragement, directly caused by the +competitive method? Who can figure what it means to human society that a +great percentage of the people in it should be haunted by fear of one +sort or another—the poor in fear of unemployment, sickness and +starvation, the little business man in fear of bankruptcy and<a name="vol_ii_page_165" id="vol_ii_page_165"></a> suicide, +the big business man in fear of hard times and treachery of his +competitors, the idle rich in fear of robbery and blackmail, and the +whole community in fear of foreign war and domestic tumult!</p> + +<p>Anyone might go on and elaborate these factors that I have named, and +think of scores of others. Anyone familiar with business life or with +industrial processes would be able to put his finger on this or that +enormous saving which he would be able to make if he and all his rivals +could combine and come to an agreement. This has been proven over and +over again in large-scale industry; it is the fact which has made of +large-scale industry an overwhelming power, sucking all the profits to +itself, reaching out and taking in new fields of human activity, and +setting at naught all popular clamor and even legal terrors. How can +anyone, seeing these facts, bring himself to deny that if we did +systematize production and make it one enterprise, precisely adapted to +one end, we should enormously increase the results of human labor, and +the benefit to all who do the world's work?</p> + +<p>A good deal of this waste we can stop when we get ready, and other parts +of it our bountiful mother nature will replace. When in a world war we +kill some ten or twenty millions of the flower of our young manhood, we +have only to wait several generations, and our race will be as good as +ever. But, on the other hand, there is some waste that can never be +repaired, and this is the thing truly frightful to contemplate. When we +dig the iron ore out of the bowels of the earth and rust it away in +wars, we are doing something our race can never undo. And the same is +true of many of our precious substances: phosphorus, sulphur, potash. +When we cut down the forests from our mountain slopes, and lay bare the +earth, we not merely cause floods and washouts, and silt up our harbors, +we take away from the surface of our land the precious life-giving soil, +and make a habitable land into a desert, which no irrigating and +reforesting can ever completely restore. The Chinese have done that for +many centuries, and we are following in their footsteps; more than six +hundred million wagon-loads of our best soil are washed down to the sea +every year! If you wish to know about these matters, I send you to a +book, "On Board the Good Ship Earth," by Herbert Quick. It is one of the +most heart-breaking books you ever read, yet it is merely a quiet +statement of the facts about our present commercial anarchy.<a name="vol_ii_page_166" id="vol_ii_page_166"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXIII" id="CHAPTER_LXIII"></a>CHAPTER LXIII<br /><br /> +SOCIALISM AND SYNDICALISM</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the idea of the management of industry by the state, and +the idea of its management by the trade unions.)</p></div> + +<p>Let us now assume that we desire to abolish the wastes of the +competitive method, and to put our industry on a basis of co-operation. +How should we effect the change, and how should we run our industry +after it was done?</p> + +<p>Let us take the United States Steel Corporation. What change would be +necessary to the socializing of this concern? United States Steel is +owned by a group of stockholders, and governed by a board of directors +elected by them. The owners are now to be bought out with government +bonds, and the board of directors retired. It may also be necessary to +replace a certain number of the higher executive officials, who are +imbued entirely with the point of view of this board, and have to do +with finance, rather than with production. Of course, some other +governing authority would have to be put in control. What would this +authority be? There are several plans before the world, several +different schools of thought, which we shall consider one by one.</p> + +<p>First, the Socialist program. The Socialist says, "Consider the +postoffice, how that is run. It is run by the President, who appoints a +Postmaster-General as his executive. Let us therefore turn the steel +industry over to the government, and let the President appoint another +member of his cabinet, a Director of Steel; or let there be a +commission, similar to the Interstate Commerce Commission, or the +various war industry boards." Any form of management of the steel +industry which provides for its control and operation by our United +States government is Socialism of one sort or another.</p> + +<p>There has been, of late, a great deal of dissatisfaction with +government, on the part of the general public, and also of labor. The +postoffice clerks, for example, complain that they are inadequately paid +and autocratically managed, deprived of their rights not merely as +workers but as citizens. The steel workers complain that when they go on +strike against their masters, the<a name="vol_ii_page_167" id="vol_ii_page_167"></a> government sends in troops and +crushes their strike, regardless of the rights or wrongs of it. In order +to meet such tactics, labor goes into politics, and elects here and +there its own representatives; but these representatives become +mysteriously affected by the bureaucratic point of view, and even where +they try hard, they do not accomplish much for labor. Therefore, labor +becomes disgusted with the political process, and labor men do not +welcome the prospect of being managed by government.</p> + +<p>If you ask such men, they will say: "No; the politicians don't know +anything about industry, and can't learn. The people who know about +industry are those who work in it. The true way to run an industry is +through an organization of the workers, both of hand and brain. The true +way to run the Steel Trust is for all the workers in it, men and women, +high and low, to be recognized by law as citizens of that industry; each +shop must elect its own delegates to run that shop, and elect a delegate +to a central parliament of the industry, and this industry in turn must +elect delegates to a great parliament or convention of all the delegates +of all the industries. In such a central gathering every one would be +represented, because every person would be a producer of some sort, and +whether he was a steel worker or a street sweeper or a newsboy, he would +have a vote at the place where he earns his living, and would have a say +in the management of his job. The great central parliament would elect +an executive committee and a president, and so we should have a +government of the workers, by the workers, for the workers." This idea +is known as Syndicalism, derived from the French word "syndicat," +meaning a labor union. Since the Russian revolution it has come to be +known as soviet government, "soviet" being the Russian word for trade +council.</p> + +<p>Now, taking these two ideas of Socialism and Syndicalism, it is evident +that they may be combined in various ways, and applied in varying +degrees. It is perfectly conceivable, for example, that the people of +the United States might elect a president pledged to call a parliament +of industry, and to delegate the control of industry to this parliament. +He might delegate the control to a certain extent, and provide for its +extension, step by step; so our society might move into Syndicalism by +the way of Socialism. You have only to put your mind on the +possibilities of the situation to realize that one method shades into +the other with a great variety of stages.<a name="vol_ii_page_168" id="vol_ii_page_168"></a></p> + +<p>Consider next the stages between capitalism and Socialism. We have in +the United States some industries which are purely capitalistic; for +example, the Steel Trust, which is privately owned, and has been +powerful enough, not merely to suppress every effort of its workers to +organize, but every effort of the government to regulate it. On the +other hand, the United States Postoffice represents State Socialism; +although the workers have been forbidden to organize, and the management +of the industry is so arbitrary that I have always preferred to call it +State Capitalism. Likewise the United States army and navy represent +State Socialism. When we had the job of putting the Kaiser out of +business, we did not hire Mr. Rockefeller to do it; it never once +occurred to our advocates of "individualism," of "capitalist enterprise +and initiative," to suggest that we should hire out our army and navy, +or employ the Steel Trust or the Powder Trust to organize its own army +and navy to do the fighting for us. Likewise, for the most part, we run +the job of educating our children by the method of municipal Socialism. +We run our libraries in the same way, and likewise our job of fire +protection.</p> + +<p>It is interesting to note how in every country the line between +capitalism and Socialism is drawn in a different place. In America we +run practically all our libraries for ourselves, but it would seem to us +preposterous to think of running our theatres. In Europe, however, they +have state-owned theatres, which set a far higher standard of art than +anything we know at home. Also, they have state-owned orchestras and +opera-houses, something we Americans leave to the subscriptions of +millionaires. In Europe it seems perfectly natural to the people that +the state should handle their telegrams in connection with the +postoffice; but if you urge government ownership of the telegraphs in +the United States, they tell you that the proposition is "socialistic," +and that saves the need of thinking about it. We take it for granted +that our cities could run the libraries—even though we were glad when +Carnegie came along and saved us the need of appropriating money for +buildings. Just why a city should be able to run a library, and should +not be able to run an opera-house, or a newspaper, is something which +has never been made clear to me.</p> + +<p>Let us next examine the stages between capitalism and Syndicalism. A +great many large corporations are making experiments in what they call +"shop management," allowing the workers<a name="vol_ii_page_169" id="vol_ii_page_169"></a> membership in the boards of +directors and a voice in the conditions of their labor. This is +Syndicalism so far as it goes. Likewise it is Syndicalism when the +clothing workers and the clothing manufacturers meet together and agree +to the setting up of a permanent committee to work out a set of rules +for the conduct of the industry, and to fix wages from time to time. +Obviously, these things are capable of indefinite extension, and in +Europe they are being developed far more rapidly. For example, in Italy +the agricultural workers are organized, and are gradually taking +possession of the great estates, which are owned by absentee landlords. +They wage war upon these estates by means of sabotage and strikes, and +then they buy up the estates at bargain prices and develop them by +co-operative labor. This has been going on in Italy for ten years, and +has become the most significant movement in the country. It is a triumph +of pure Syndicalism; and such is the power of pure capitalism in the +United States that the American people have not been allowed to know +anything about this change.</p> + +<p>Next, what are the stages between Socialism and Syndicalism? These also +are infinite in number and variety. As a matter of fact, there are very +few Socialists who advocate State Socialism without any admixture of +Syndicalism. The regular formula of the Socialist party is "the social +ownership and democratic control of the instruments and means of +production;" and what the phrase "democratic control" means is simply +that you introduce into your Socialist mixture a certain flavoring of +Syndicalism, greater or less, according to your temperament. In the same +way there are many Syndicalists who are inclined toward Socialism. In +every convention of radical trade unionists, such as, for example, the +I. W. W., you find some who favor political action, and these will have +the same point of view as the more radical members of the Socialist +party, who urge a program of industrial as well as political action.<a name="vol_ii_page_170" id="vol_ii_page_170"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXIV" id="CHAPTER_LXIV"></a>CHAPTER LXIV<br /><br /> +COMMUNISM AND ANARCHISM</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Considers the idea of goods owned in common, and the idea of a +society without compulsion, and how these ideas have fared in +Russia.)</p></div> + +<p>The Russian revolution has familiarized us with the word Communism. In +the beginning of the revolutionary movement Communism denoted what we +now call Socialism; for example, the Communist Manifesto of Marx and +Engels became the platform of the Social-democratic parties. But because +most of these parties supported their governments during the war, the +more radical elements have now rejected the word Socialism, and taken up +the old word Communism. In the Russian revolution the Communists went so +far as to seize all the property of the rich, and so the word Communism +has come to bear something of its early Christian significance.</p> + +<p>It is obvious that here, too, it is a question of degree, and Socialism +will shade into Communism by an infinite variety of stages, depending +upon what forms of property it is decided to socialize. The Socialist +formula commonly accepted is that "goods socially used shall be socially +owned, and goods privately used shall be privately owned." If you own a +factory, it will be taken by the state, or by the workers, and made +social property like the postoffice; but no Socialist wants to socialize +your clothing, or your books, any more than he wants to socialize your +toothbrush.</p> + +<p>But when you come to apply this formula, you run quickly into +difficulties. Suppose you are a millionaire, and own a palace with one +or two hundred rooms, and a hundred servants. Do you use that socially, +or do you use it privately? And suppose there is a scarcity of houses, +and thousands of children are dying of tuberculosis in crowded tenement +rooms? You own a dozen automobiles, and do you use them all privately? I +point out to you that in time of emergency the capitalist state does not +hesitate over such a problem; it seizes your palace and turns it into a +hospital, it takes all your cars and uses them to carry troops. It +should be obvious that a proletarian state would be tempted by this +precedent.<a name="vol_ii_page_171" id="vol_ii_page_171"></a></p> + +<p>The Communists also have a formula, which reads: "From each according to +his ability, to each according to his necessity." I do not see how any +sensitive person can deny that this is an extremely fine statement of an +ideal in social life. We take it quite for granted in family life; if +you knew a family in which that rule did not apply, you would consider +it an unloving and uncivilized family. I believe that when once industry +has been socialized, and we have a chance to see what production can +become, we shall find ourselves quickly adopting that family custom as +our law, for all except a few congenital criminals and cheats. We shall +find that we can produce so much wealth that it is not worth while +keeping count of unimportant items. If today you meet someone on the +street and ask him for a match or a pin, you do not think of offering to +pay him. This is an automatic consequence of the cheapness of matches +and pins. Once upon a time you were stopped on the road every few miles +and made to pay a few cents toll. I remember seeing toll-gates when I +was a boy, but I don't think I have seen one for twenty years.</p> + +<p>In exactly the same way, under socialized industry, we shall probably +make street-car traffic free, and then railroad traffic; we shall +abolish water meters and gas meters and electric light meters, also +telephone charges, except perhaps for long distances, and telegraph +tolls for personal messages. Then, presently, we shall find ourselves +with such a large wheat crop that we shall make bread free; and then +music and theatres and clothing and books. At present we use furniture +and clothing as a means of manifesting our economic superiority to our +fellowmen. One of the most charming books in our language is Veblen's +"Theory of the Leisure Class," in which these processes are studied. We +shall, of course, have to raise up a new generation, unaccustomed to the +idea of class and of class distinction, before we could undertake to +supply people with all the clothing they wanted free of charge.</p> + +<p>The Russian theorists made haste to carry out these ideas all at once; +they tried to leap several centuries in the evolution of Russian +society. They ordained complete Communism in land; but the peasants +would have nothing to do with such notions—each wanted his own land, +and what he produced on it. The Soviets have now been forced to give +way, not merely to the peasants, but to the traders; and so we see once +again that it is better to take one step forward than to take several +steps<a name="vol_ii_page_172" id="vol_ii_page_172"></a> forward and then several steps backward. The Russian revolution +is not yet completed, so no one can say how many steps backward it will +be forced to take.</p> + +<p>This revolution was an interesting combination of the ideas of Socialism +and Syndicalism. The trade unionists seized the factories, and made an +effort at democratic control of industry. At the same time the state was +overthrown by a political party, the Bolsheviks, who set up a +dictatorship of the proletariat. Because of civil war and outside +invasion, the democratic elements in the experiment have been more and +more driven into the background, and the authority of the state has +correspondingly increased. This causes us to think of the Soviet system +as necessarily opposed to democracy, but this is not in any way a +necessary thing. There is no inevitable connection between industrial +control by the workers and a dictatorship over the state. In Germany the +state is proceeding to organize a national parliament of industry, and +to provide for management of the factories by the labor unions. The +Italian government has promised to do the same thing. These, of course, +are capitalist governments, and they will keep their promises only as +they are made to; but it is a perfectly possible thing that in either of +these countries a vote of the people might change the government, and +put in authority men who would really proceed to turn industry over to +the control of the workers. That would be the Soviet or Syndicalist +system, brought about by democratic means, without dictatorship or civil +war.</p> + +<p>Another group of revolutionary thinkers whose theories must be mentioned +are the Anarchists. The word Anarchy is commonly used as a synonym for +chaos and disorder, which it does not mean at all. It means the absence +of authority; and it is characteristic of people's view of life that +they are unable to conceive of there being such a thing as order, unless +it is maintained by force. The theory of the Anarchist is that order is +a necessity of the human spirit, and that people would conform to the +requirements of a just order by their own free will and without external +compulsion. The Anarchist believes that the state is an instrument of +class oppression, and has no other reason for being. He wishes the +industries to be organized by free associations of the people who work +in them.</p> + +<p>Some of the greatest of the world's moral teachers have been Anarchists: +Jesus, for example, and Shelley and Thoreau and Tolstoi, and in our time +Kropotkin. These men voiced the<a name="vol_ii_page_173" id="vol_ii_page_173"></a> highest aspirations of the human +spirit, and the form of society which they dreamed is the one we set +before us as our final goal. But the world does not leap into perfection +all at once, and meantime here we have the capitalist system and the +capitalist state, and what attitude shall we take to them? There are +impassioned idealists who refuse to make any terms with injustice, or to +submit to compulsion, and these preach the immediate destruction of +capitalist government, and capitalist government responds with prison +and torture, and so we have some Anarchists who throw bombs.</p> + +<p>There are those who call themselves "philosophic" Anarchists, wishing to +indicate thereby that they preach this doctrine, but do not attempt to +carry it into action as yet. Some among these verge toward the Communist +point of view, and call themselves Communist-anarchists; such was +Kropotkin, whose theories of social organization you will find in his +book "The Conquest of Bread." There are others who call themselves +Syndicalist-anarchists, finding their centers of free association in the +radical labor unions.</p> + +<p>After the Russian revolution, the Anarchists found themselves in a +dilemma, and their groups were torn apart like every other party and +class in Russia. Here was a new form of state set up in society, a +workers' state, and what attitude should the Anarchists take toward +that? Many of them stood out for their principles, and resisted the +Bolshevik state, and put the Bolsheviks under the embarrassing necessity +of throwing them into jail. We good orthodox Americans, who are +accustomed to dump Socialists and Communists and Syndicalists and +Anarchists all together into one common kettle, took Emma Goldman and +Alexander Berkman and shipped them over to Russia, where we thought they +belonged. Now our capitalist newspapers find it strange that these +Anarchists do not like the Russian government any better than they like +the American government!</p> + +<p>On the other hand, a great many Anarchists have suddenly found +themselves compelled by the Russian situation to face the facts of life. +They have decided that a government is not such a bad thing after +all—when it is your own government! Robert Minor, for example, has +recanted his Anarchist position, and joined the Communists in advocating +the dropping of all differences among the workers, all theories as to +the future, and concentrating upon the immediate task of overthrowing +capitalist<a name="vol_ii_page_174" id="vol_ii_page_174"></a> government and keeping it overthrown. In every civilized +nation the Russian revolution has had this effect upon the extreme +revolutionists. It has given them a definite aim and a definite program +upon which they can unite; it has presented to capitalist government the +answer of force to force; it has shown the masters of industry in +precise and definite form what they have to face—unless they set +themselves immediately and in good faith to the task of establishing +real democracy in industry.<a name="vol_ii_page_175" id="vol_ii_page_175"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXV" id="CHAPTER_LXV"></a>CHAPTER LXV<br /><br /> +SOCIAL REVOLUTION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(How the great change is coming in different industries, and how we +may prepare to meet it.)</p></div> + +<p>From a study of the world's political revolutions we observe that a +variety of governmental forms develop, and that different circumstances +in each country produce different institutions. Suppose that back in the +days of the French monarchy some one asked you how France was going to +be governed as a political republic; how would elections be held, what +would be the powers of the deputies, who would choose the premier, who +would choose the president, what would be the duties of each? Who can +explain why in France and England the executive is responsible to the +parliament and must answer its questions, while in the United States the +executive is an autocrat, responsible to no one for four years? Who +could have foreseen that in England, supposed to remain a monarchy, the +constitution would be fluid; while in America, supposed to be a +democracy, the constitution would be rigid, and the supreme power of +rejecting changes in the laws would be vested in a group of reactionary +lawyers appointed for life? There will be similar surprises in the +social revolution, and similar differences between what things pretend +to be and what they are.</p> + +<p>I used to compare the social revolution to the hatching of an egg. You +examine it, and apparently it is all egg; but then suddenly something +begins to happen, and in a few minutes it is all chicken. If, however, +you investigate, you discover that the chicken had been forming inside +the egg for some time. I know that there is a chicken now forming inside +our social egg; but having realized the complexity of social phenomena, +I no longer venture to predict the exact time of the hatching, or the +size and color of the chicken.</p> + +<p>Perhaps it is more useful to compare the social revolution to a +child-birth. A good surgeon knows what is due to happen, but he knows +also that there are a thousand uncertainties, a thousand dangerous +possibilities, and all he can do is to watch the process and be prepared +to meet each emergency as it arises.<a name="vol_ii_page_176" id="vol_ii_page_176"></a> The birth process consists of one +pang after another, but no one can say which pang will complete the +birth, or whether it will be completed at all. Karl Marx is author of +the saying that "force is the midwife of progress," so you may see that +I am not the inventor of this simile of child-birth.</p> + +<p>There are three factors in the social revolution, each of which will +vary in each country, and in different parts of the country, and at +different periods. First, there is the industrial condition of the +country, a complex set of economic factors. The industrial life of +England depends primarily on shipping and coal. In the United States +shipping is of less importance, and railroads take the place. In the +United States the eastern portion lives mainly by manufacture, the +western by agriculture, while the south is held a generation behind by a +race problem. In France the great estates were broken up, and +agriculture fell into the hands of peasant proprietors, who are the main +support of French capitalism. In Prussia the great estates were held +intact, and remained the basis of a feudal aristocracy. In America land +changes hands freely, and therefore one-third of our farms are +mortgaged, and another third are worked by tenants. In Russia there was +practically no middle class, while in the United States there is +practically nothing but middle class; the rich have been rich for such a +short while that they still look middle class and act middle class, in +spite of all their efforts, while the working class hopes to be middle +class and is persuaded that it can become middle class. Such varying +factors produce in each country a different problem, and make inevitable +a different process of change.</p> + +<p>The second factor is the condition of organization and education of the +workers. This likewise varies in every country, and in every part of +every country. There is a continual struggle on the part of the workers +to organize and educate themselves, and a continual effort on the part +of the ruling class to prevent this. In some industries in America you +find the workers one hundred per cent organized, and in other industries +you find them not organized at all. It is obvious that in the former +case the social change, when it comes, will be comparatively simple, +involving little bloodshed and waste; in the latter case there will be +social convulsions, rioting and destruction of property, disorganization +of industry and widespread distress.</p> + +<p>The third factor is the state of mind of the propertied classes, the +amount of resistance they are willing to make to<a name="vol_ii_page_177" id="vol_ii_page_177"></a> social change. I have +done a great deal of pleading with the masters of industry in my +country; I have written appeals to Vincent Astor and John D. +Rockefeller, to capitalist newspapers and judges and congressmen and +presidents. I have been told that this is a waste of my time; that these +people cannot learn and will not learn, and that it is foolish to appeal +either to their hearts or their understanding. But I perceive that the +class struggle is like a fraction; it has a numerator and a denominator, +and you can increase the fraction just as well by decreasing the +denominator as by increasing the numerator. To vary the simile, here are +two groups of men engaged in a tug of war, and you can affect the result +just as decisively by persuading one group to pull less hard, as by +persuading the other group to pull harder.</p> + +<p>Picture to yourself two factories. In factory number one the owner is a +hard-driving business man, an active spirit in the so-called "open-shop" +campaign. He believes in his divine right to manage industry, and he +believes also in the gospel of "all that the traffic will bear." He +prevents his men from organizing, and employs spies to weed out the +radicals and to sow dissensions. When a strike comes, he calls in the +police and the strike-breaking agencies, and in every possible way he +makes himself hated and feared by his workers. Then some day comes the +unemployment crisis, and a wave of revolt sweeping over the country. The +workers seize that factory and set up a dictatorship of the proletariat +and a "red terror." If the owner resists, they kill him; in any case, +they wipe out his interest in the business, and do everything possible +to destroy his power over it, even to his very name. They run the +business by a shop committee, and you have for that particular factory a +Syndicalist, or even Anarchist form of social reconstruction.</p> + +<p>Now for factory number two, whose owner is a humane and enlightened man, +studying social questions and realizing his responsibility, and the +temporary nature of his stewardship. He gives his people the best +possible working conditions, he keeps open books and discusses wages and +profits with them, he educates the young workers, he meets with their +union committees on a basis of free discussion. When the unemployment +crisis comes and the wave of revolt sweeps the country, this man and his +workers understand one another. He says: "I can no longer pay profits, +and so I can no longer keep going under the profit system; but if you +are ready to run the plant, I am<a name="vol_ii_page_178" id="vol_ii_page_178"></a> ready to help you the best I can." +Manifestly, this man will continue the president of the corporation, and +if he trains his sons wisely, they will keep his place; so, instead of +having in that factory a dictatorship and a terror, you will have a +constitutional monarchy, gradually evolving into a democratic republic.<a name="vol_ii_page_179" id="vol_ii_page_179"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXVI" id="CHAPTER_LXVI"></a>CHAPTER LXVI<br /><br /> +CONFISCATION OR COMPENSATION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Shall the workers buy out the capitalists? Can they afford to do +it, and what will be the price?)</p></div> + +<p>The problem of whether the social revolution shall be violent or +peaceable depends in great part upon our answer to the question of +confiscation versus compensation. We are now going to consider, first, +the abstract rights and wrongs of the question, and, second, the +practical aspects of it.</p> + +<p>There is a story very popular among single taxers and other advocates of +freedom of the land. An English land-owner met a stranger walking on his +estate, and rebuked him for trespassing. Said the stranger, "You own +this land?" Said the other, "I do." "And how did you get it?" "I +inherited it from my father." "And how did your father get it?" "He +inherited it from his father." So on for half a dozen more ancestors, +until at last the Englishman answered, "He fought for it." Whereupon the +stranger took off his coat and rolled up his sleeves and said, "I'll +fight you for it."</p> + +<p>This is all there is to say on the subject of the abstract rights of +land titles. There is no title to land which is valid on a historical +basis. Everything rests upon fraud and force, continued through endless +ages of human history. We in the United States took most of our land +from the Indians, and in the process our guiding rule was that the only +good Injun was a dead Injun. We first helped the English kings to take +large sections of our country from the French and Spanish, and then we +took them from the English king by a violent revolution. We purchased +our Southwestern states from Mexico, but not until we had taken the +precaution of killing some thousands of Mexicans in war, which had the +effect of keeping down the purchase price. It would be a simple matter +to show that all public franchises are similarly tainted with fraud. +Proudhon laid down the principle that "property is theft," and from this +principle it is an obvious conclusion that society has the right to +scrap all paper titles to wealth, and to start the world's industries +over again on the basis of share and share alike.<a name="vol_ii_page_180" id="vol_ii_page_180"></a></p> + +<p>But stop and consider for a moment. "Property is theft," you say. But go +to your corner grocery, and tell the grocer that you deny his title to +the sack of prunes which he exhibits in front of his counter. He will +tell you that he has paid for them; but you answer that the prunes were +raised on stolen land, and shipped to him over a railroad whose +franchise was obtained by bribery. Will that convince the grocer? It +will not. Neither will it convince the policeman or the judge, nor will +it convince the voters of the country. Most people have a deeply rooted +conviction that there are rights to property now definitely established +and made valid by law. If you have paid taxes on land for a certain +period, the land "belongs" to you; and I am sure you might agitate from +now to kingdom come without persuading the American people that New +Mexico ought to be returned to Mexico, or the western prairies to the +Indian tribes.</p> + +<p>Such are the facts; now let us apply them to the right of exploitation, +embodied in the ownership of a certain number of bonds or shares of +stock in the United States Steel Corporation. "Pass a law," says the +Socialist, "providing for the taking over of United States Steel by the +government." At once to every owner comes one single thought—are you +going to buy this stock, or are you going to confiscate it? If you +attempt confiscation, the courts will declare the law unconstitutional; +and you either have to defy the courts, which is revolutionary action, +or to amend the constitution. If you adopt the latter course, you have +before you a long period of agitation; you have to carry both houses of +Congress by a two-thirds majority, and the legislatures of three-fourths +of the States. You have to do this in the face of the most bitter and +infuriated opposition of those who are defending what they regard as +their rights. You have to meet the arguments of the entire capitalist +press of the country, and you have the certainty of widespread bribery +of your elected officials.</p> + +<p>The prospect of doing all this under the forms of law seems extremely +discouraging; so come the Syndicalists, saying, "Let us seize the +factories, and stop the exploitation at the point of production." So +come the Communists, saying, "Let us overthrow capitalist government, +and break the net of bourgeois legality, and establish a dictatorship of +the proletariat, which will put an end to privilege and class domination +all at once." What are we to say to these different programs?</p> + +<p>Suppose we buy out the stockholders of United States Steel,<a name="vol_ii_page_181" id="vol_ii_page_181"></a> and issue +to them government bonds, what have we accomplished? Nothing, say the +advocates of confiscation; we have changed the form of exploitation, but +the substance of it remains the same. The stockholders get their money +from the United States government, instead of from the United States +Steel Corporation; but they get their money just the same—the product, +not of their labor, but of the labor of the steel workers. Suppose we +carried out the same procedure all along the line; suppose the +government took over all industries, and paid for their securities with +government bonds. Then we should have capitalism administered by a +capitalist government, instead of by our present masters of industry; we +should have a state capitalism, instead of a private capitalism; we +should have the government buying and selling products, and exploiting +labor, and paying over the profits to an hereditary privileged class. +The capitalist system would go on just the same, except that labor would +have one all-powerful tyrant, instead of many lesser tyrants, as at +present.</p> + +<p>So argue the advocates of confiscation. And the advocates of purchase +reply that in buying the securities of United States Steel, we should +fix the purchase price at the present market value of the property, and +that price, once fixed, would be permanent; all future unearned +increment of the steel industry would belong to the government instead +of to private owners. Consider, for example, what happened during the +world war. When I was a boy, soon after the Steel Trust was launched, +its stock was down to something like six dollars, and I knew small +investors who lost every dollar they had put in. But during the war, +steel stock soared to a hundred and thirty-six dollars per share; it +paid dividends of some thirty per cent per year, and accumulated +enormous surpluses besides.</p> + +<p>The same thing was true of practically all the big corporations. +According to Secretary of the Treasury McAdoo, there were coal companies +which paid as high as eight hundred per cent per year; that is to say, +the profits in one year were eight times the total investment. Assuming +that our government bonds paid five per cent, it appears that the owners +of these coal companies got one hundred and sixty times as much under +our present private property system as they would have got under a +system of state purchase. Even completely dominated by capitalism as our +courts are today, they would not dare require us to pay for industries +more than six per cent on the market value<a name="vol_ii_page_182" id="vol_ii_page_182"></a> of the investment; and from +what I know of the inside graft of American big business that would be +restricting the private owners to less than one-fourth of what they are +getting at present.</p> + +<p>We have already pointed out the economies that can be made by putting +industry under a uniform system. But all these, important as they are, +amount to little in comparison with the one great consideration, which +is that by purchasing large scale industry, we should break the "iron +ring"; we should thenceforth be able to do our manufacturing for use +instead of for profit, and so we should put an end to unemployment. Our +cheerful workers would throng into the factories, to produce for +themselves instead of for masters; and in one year of that we should so +change the face of our country that a return to the system of private +ownership would be unthinkable. In one year we could raise production to +such a point that the interest on the bonds we had issued would be like +the crumbs left over from a feast.<a name="vol_ii_page_183" id="vol_ii_page_183"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXVII" id="CHAPTER_LXVII"></a>CHAPTER LXVII<br /><br /> +EXPROPRIATING THE EXPROPRIATORS</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the dictatorship of the proletariat, and its chances for +success in the United States.)</p></div> + +<p>I am aware that the suggestion of paying for the industries we socialize +will sound tame and uninspiring to a lot of ardent young radicals of my +acquaintance. They will shake their heads sadly and say that I am +getting middle-aged and tired. We have seen in Russia and Hungary and +other places, so many illustrations of the quick and easy way to +expropriate the expropriators that now there is in every country a +considerable group of radicals who will hear to no program less +picturesque than barricades and councils of action.</p> + +<p>In considering this question, I set aside all considerations of abstract +right or wrong, the justification for violence in the overthrow of +capitalist society. I put the question on the basis of cash, pure and +simple. It will cost a certain amount of money to buy out the owners, +and that money will have to be paid, as it is paid at present, out of +the labor of the useful workers. The workers don't want to pay any more +than they have to; the question they must consider is, which way will +they have to pay most. The advocates of the dictatorship of the +proletariat are lured by the delightful prospect of not having to pay +anything; and if that were really possible it would undoubtedly be the +better way. But we have to consider this question: Is the program of not +having to pay anything a reality, or is it only a dream? Suppose it +should turn out that we have to pay anyhow, and that in the case of +violent revolution we pay much more, and in addition run serious risk of +not getting what we pay for?</p> + +<p>Here are enormous industries, running at full blast, and it is proposed +that some morning the workers shall rise up and seize them, and turn out +the owners and managers, and run the industries themselves. Will anybody +maintain that this can be done without stopping production in those +factories for a single day? Certainly production must stop during the +time you are<a name="vol_ii_page_184" id="vol_ii_page_184"></a> fighting for possession; and the cruel experience of +Russia proves that it will stop during the further time you are fighting +to keep possession, and to put down counter-revolutionary conspiracies. +Also, alas, it will stop during the time you are looking for somebody +who knows how to run that industry; it will stop during the time you are +organizing your new administrative staff. You may discover to your +consternation that it stops during the time you are arranging to get +other industries to give you credit, and to ship you raw materials; also +during the time you are finding the workers in other industries who want +your product, and are able to pay for it with something that you can +use, or that you can sell in a badly disorganized market.</p> + +<p>And all the time that you are arranging these things, you are going to +have the workers at your back, not getting any pay, or being paid with +your paper money which they distrust, and growling and grumbling at you +because you are not running things as you promised. You see, the mass of +the workers are not going to understand, because you haven't made them +understand; you have brought about the great change by your program of a +dictatorship, of action by an "enlightened minority"; and now you have +the terror that the unenlightened majority may be won back by their +capitalist masters, and may kick you out of control, or even stand you +up against a wall and shoot you by a firing squad. And all the time you +are worrying over these problems, who can estimate the total amount the +factory might have been producing if it had been running at full blast? +Whatever that difference is, remember, it is paid by the workers; and +might that sum not just as well have been used to buy out the owners?</p> + +<p>If we were back in the old days of hand labor and crude, unorganized +production, I admit that the only way to benefit the slaves might be to +turn out the masters by force. But here we have a social system of +infinite complexity, a delicate and sensitive machine, which no one +person in the world, and no group of persons understands thoroughly. In +the running of such a machine a slight blunder may cost a fortune; and +certainly all the skill, all the training, all the loyal services of our +expert engineers and managers is needed if we are to remodel that +machine while keeping it running. The amount of wealth which we could +save by the achieving of that feat would be sufficient to maintain a +class of owners in idleness and luxury<a name="vol_ii_page_185" id="vol_ii_page_185"></a> for a generation; and so I say, +with all the energy and conviction I possess, <i>pay them</i>! Pay them +anything that is necessary, in order to avoid civil war and social +disorganization! Pay them so much that they can have no possible cause +of complaint, that the most hide-bound capitalistic-minded judge in the +country cannot find a legal flaw in the bargain! Pay them so that every +engineer and efficiency expert and manager and foreman and stenographer +and office-boy will stay on the job and work double time to put the +enterprise through! Pay them such a price that even Judge Gary and John +D. Rockefeller will be willing to help us do the job of social +readjustment!</p> + +<p>"Ah, yes," my young radical friends will say, "that sounds all very +beautiful, but it's the old Utopian dream of brotherhood and class +co-operation. That will never happen on this earth, until you have first +abolished capitalism." My answer is, it could happen tomorrow if we had +sufficient intelligence to make it happen. That it does not happen is +simply absence of intelligence. And will anyone maintain that it is the +part of an intelligent man to advocate a less intelligent course than he +knows? What is the use of our intelligence, if we abdicate its +authority, and give ourselves up to programs of action which we know are +blind and destructive and wasteful? We may see a great vessel going on +the rocks; we may feel certain that it is going, in spite of everything +we can do; but shall we fail to do what we can to make those in the +vessel realize how they might get safely into the harbor?</p> + +<p>We have had the Russian revolution before us for four years. Mankind +will spend the next hundred years in studying it, and still have much to +learn, but the broad outlines of the great experiment are now plain +before our eyes. Russia was a backward country, and she tried to fight a +modern war, and it broke her down. She had practically no middle class, +and her ruling class was rotten, and so the revolutionists had their +chance, and they seized it. Perhaps it would be more correct to say that +they came to the rescue of Russia, saving her from the hands of those +who were trying to force her to fight, when she was utterly exhausted +and incapable of fighting.</p> + +<p>Anyhow, here was your dictatorship of the proletariat. It turned out all +the executive experts, or nearly all of them, because they were tainted +with the capitalist psychology; and then straightway it had to call them +back and make terms with them, because industry could not be run without +them. And of<a name="vol_ii_page_186" id="vol_ii_page_186"></a> course these engineers and managers sabotaged the +revolution—every non-proletarian sabotaged it, both inside Russia and +outside. You denounced this, and protested against this, but all the +same it happened; it was human nature that it should happen, and it is +one of the things you have to count on, in any and every country where +you attempt the social revolution by minority action.</p> + +<p>They have got power in Russia, and they dream of getting power in +America in the same way. But there is no such disorganization in our +country as there was in Russia, and it would take a generation of civil +strife to bring us to such a condition. We have a middle class, +powerful, thoroughly organized, and thoroughly conscious. Moreover, this +class has ideals of majority rule, which are bred in its very bones; and +while they have never realized these ideals, they think they have, and +they are prepared to fight to the last gasp in that belief. All that the +leaders of Moscow have to do is to bring about an attempt at forcible +revolution, and they will discover in American society sufficient power +of organization and of brutal action to put their movement out of +business for a generation.</p> + +<p>A hundred years ago we had chattel slavery firmly fixed as the +industrial system of one-half of these United States. To far-seeing +statesmen it was manifest that chattel slavery was a wasteful system, +and that it could not exist in competition with free labor. There was a +great American, Henry Clay, who came forward with a proposition that the +people of the United States, through their government, should raise the +money, about a billion dollars, and compensate the owners of all the +slaves and set them free. For most of his lifetime Henry Clay pleaded +for that plan. But the masters of the South were making money fast; they +knew how to handle the negro as a slave, they could not imagine handling +him as a free laborer, and they would not hear to the plan. On the other +side of Mason and Dixon's line were fanatical men of "principle," who +said that slavery was wrong, and that was the end of it. There is a +stanza by Emerson discussing this question of confiscation versus +compensation:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Pay ransom to the owner</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">And fill the bag to the brim.</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Who is the owner? The slave is owner,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 1em;">And ever was. Pay him.</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_187" id="vol_ii_page_187"></a></p> + +<p>This, you see, is magnificent utterance, but as economic philosophy it +is reckless and unsound. The abolitionists of the North took up this +poem, and the slave power of the South answered with a battle-song:</p> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="poetry"> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">War to the hilt,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Theirs be the guilt,</span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 0em;">Who fetter the freeman to ransom the slave!</span></td></tr> +</table> + +<p>And so the issue had to be fought out. It cost a million human lives and +five billions of treasure, and it set American civilization back a +generation. And now we confront exactly the same kind of emergency, and +are coming to exactly the same method of solution. We have white +wage-slaves clamoring for their freedom, and we have business men making +money out of them, and exercising power over them, and finding it +convenient and pleasant. They are going to fight it out in a civil war, +and which side is going to win I am not sure. But when the historians +come to write about it a couple of generations from now, let them be +able to record that there were a few men in the country who pleaded for +a sane and orderly and human solution of the problem, and who continued +to voice their convictions even in the midst of the cruel and wasteful +strife!<a name="vol_ii_page_188" id="vol_ii_page_188"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXVIII" id="CHAPTER_LXVIII"></a>CHAPTER LXVIII<br /><br /> +THE PROBLEM OF THE LAND</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the land values tax as a means of social readjustment, +and compares it with other programs.)</p></div> + +<p>The writer of this book has been watching the social process for twenty +years, trying to figure out one thing—how the change from competition +to co-operation can be brought about with the minimum of human waste. He +has come to realize that the first step is a mental one; to get the +people to want the change. That means that the program must be simple, +so that the masses can understand it. As a social engineer you might +work out a perfect plan, but find yourself helpless, because it was hard +to explain. As illustration of what I mean, I cite the single tax, a +theory which has a considerable hold in America, but which politically +has been utterly ineffective.</p> + +<p>A few years ago a devoted enthusiast in Southern California, Luke North, +started what he called the "Great Adventure" to set free the idle land. +In the campaign of 1918 I gave my help to this movement, and when it +failed I went back and took stock, and revised my conclusions concerning +the single tax. Theoretically the movement has a considerable percentage +of right on its side. Land, in the sense that single taxers use it, +meaning all the natural sources of wealth, is certainly an important +basis of exploitation, and if you were to tax land values to the full +extent, you would abolish a large portion of privilege—just how large +would be hard to figure. I was perfectly willing to begin with that +portion, so I helped with the "Great Adventure." But a practical test +convinced me that it could never persuade a majority of the people.</p> + +<p>The single tax proposal is to abolish all taxes except the tax on land +values. Then come the associations of the bankers and merchants and real +estate speculators, crying in outraged horror, "What? You propose to let +the rich man's stocks and bonds go free? You propose to put no tax on +his cash in the vaults and on his wife's jewels? You propose to abolish +the income tax and the inheritance tax, and put all the costs of +government on the poor man's lot?"</p> + +<p>Now, of course, I know perfectly well that the rich man dodges most of +his income tax and most of his inheritance<a name="vol_ii_page_189" id="vol_ii_page_189"></a> tax. I know that he pays a +nominal pittance on his cash in the bank and on his wife's jewels, and +likewise on his stocks and bonds. I know that the corporations issuing +these stocks and bonds would be far more heavily hit by a tax on the +natural resources they own; they could not evade this tax, and they know +it, and that is why they are moved to such deep concern for the fate of +the poor man and his lot. I know that the tax on the poor man's lot +would be infinitesimal in comparison with the tax on the great +corporation. But how can I explain all this to the poor man? To +understand it requires a knowledge of the complexities of our economic +system which the voters simply have not got.</p> + +<p>How much easier to take the bankers and speculators at their word! To +answer, "All right, gentlemen, since you like the income and inheritance +taxes, the taxes on stocks and bonds and money and jewels, we will leave +these taxes standing. Likewise, we assent to your proposition that the +poor man should not pay taxes on his lot, while there are rich men and +corporations in our state holding twenty million acres of land out of +use for purposes of speculation. We will therefore arrange a land values +tax on a graduated basis, after the plan of the income tax; we will +allow one or two thousand dollars' worth of land exempt from all +taxation, provided it is used by the owner; and we will put a graduated +tax on all individuals and corporations owning a greater quantity of +land, so that in the case of individuals and corporations owning more +than ten thousand dollars' worth of land, we will take the full rental +value, and thus force all idle land into the market."</p> + +<p>Now, the provision above outlined would have spiked every single +argument used by the opposition to the "Great Adventure" in California +in 1918; it would have made the real intent of the measure so plain as +to win automatically the additional votes needed to carry the election. +But I tried for three years, without being able to persuade a single one +of the "Great Adventure" leaders to recognize this plain fact. The +single taxer has his formula, the land values tax and no other tax, and +all else is heresy. Actually, the president of a big single tax +organization in the East declared that by the advocacy of my idea I had +"betrayed the single tax!" We may take this as an illustration of the +difference between dogmatism and science in the strategy of the class +struggle.</p> + +<p>I first suggested my program immediately after the war,<a name="vol_ii_page_190" id="vol_ii_page_190"></a> with the +provision that the land thrown on the market should be purchased by the +state, and used to establish co-operative agricultural colonies for the +benefit of returned soldiers. But we have preferred to have our returned +soldiers stay without work, or to displace the men and women who had +been gallantly "doing their bit." By this means we soon had five million +men out of work, and many other millions bitterly discontented with +their wages. Again I took up the proposition for a graduated land tax, +with the suggestion that the money should be used to provide a pension, +first for every dependent man or woman over sixty years of age in the +country, and second for every child in the country whose parents were +unable properly to support it, whether because they were dead or sick or +unemployed.</p> + +<p>You may note that in advocating this program, you would not have to +convert anybody to any foreign theories, nor would you have to use any +long words; you would not have to say anything against the constitution, +nor to break any law, nor to give occasion for patriotic mobs to tar and +feather you. To every poor man in your state you could say, "If you own +your own house and lot, this bill will lift the taxes from both, and +therefore it will mean fifty or a hundred dollars a year in your pocket. +If you do not own a home, it will take millions of idle acres out of the +hands of the speculators, and break the price of real estate, so that +you can have either a lot in the city or a farm in the country with +ease."</p> + +<p>Furthermore, you could say, "This measure will have the effect of +drawing the unemployed from the cities at once, and so stopping the +downward course of wages. At the same time that wages hold firm, the +cost of food will go down, because there will be millions more men +working on the land. In addition to that, the state will have an +enormous income, many millions of dollars a year, taken exclusively from +those who are owning and not producing. This money will be expended in +saving from suffering and humiliation the old people of the country, who +have worked hard all their lives and have been thrown on the scrap-heap; +also in making certain that every child in the country has food enough +and care enough to make him into a normal and healthy human being, so +that he can do his share of work in the world and pay his own way +through life."</p> + +<p>I submit the above measure to those who believe that the road to social +freedom lies by some sort of land tax. But before<a name="vol_ii_page_191" id="vol_ii_page_191"></a> you take it up I +invite you to consider whether there may not be some other way, even +easier. There is a homely old saying to the effect that "molasses +catches more flies than vinegar"; and I am always looking for some way +that will get the poor what they want, without frightening the rich any +more than necessary.</p> + +<p>I know a certain type of radical whom this question always exasperates. +He answers that the opposition will be equally strong to any plan; the +rich will do anything for the poor except get off their backs—and so +on. In reply I mention that among the most ardent radicals I know are +half a dozen millionaires; I know one woman who is worth a million, who +pleads day and night for social revolution, while the people who work +for her are devoted and respectful wage slaves. Herbert Spencer said +that his idea of a tragedy was a generalization killed by a fact. I +shall not say that the existence of millionaire Socialists and parlor +Bolsheviks kills the theory of the class struggle, but I certainly say +it compels us to take thought of the rich as well as of the poor in +planning the strategy of our campaign.</p> + +<p>And manifestly, if we want to consider the rich, the very last device we +shall use is that of a tax. Nobody likes to pay taxes; everybody agrees +in classifying taxes with death. Each feels that he is paying more than +his share already; each knows that the government which collects the tax +is incompetent or worse. Stop and recall what we have proven about the +"iron ring"; the possibilities of production latent in our society. +Realize the bearings of this all-important fact, that we can offer to +mankind a social revolution which will make everybody richer, instead of +making some people poorer! Exactly how to do this is the next thing we +have to inquire.<a name="vol_ii_page_192" id="vol_ii_page_192"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXIX" id="CHAPTER_LXIX"></a>CHAPTER LXIX<br /><br /> +THE CONTROL OF CREDIT</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Deals with money, the part it plays in the restriction of +industry, and may play in the freeing of industry.)</p></div> + +<p>How is it that the rich are becoming richer? The single taxer answers +that it is by monopoly of the land, the natural sources of wealth; the +Socialist answers that it is by the control of the machinery of +production. But if you go among the rich and make inquiry, you speedily +learn that these factors, large as they are, amount to little in +comparison with another factor, the control of credit. There are hosts +of little capitalists and business men who deal in land and produce +goods with machinery, but the men who make the real fortunes and +dominate the modern world are those who control credit, and whose +business is, not the production of anything, but speculation and the +manipulation of markets.</p> + +<p>"Money makes the mare go," our ancestors used to say; and money today +determines the destiny of empires. What is money? We think of it as gold +and silver coins, and pieces of engraved paper promising to pay gold and +silver coins. But the report of the U. S. Comptroller of the Currency +for 1919 shows that the business of the country was done, 5% by such +means and 95 % by checks; so, for practical purposes, we may say that +money consists of men's willingness to trust other men, or groups or +organizations of men, when they make written promise to pay. In other +words, money is credit; and the control of credit means the control of +industry. The problem of social readjustment is mainly but the problem +of taking the control of credit out of the hands of private individuals, +and making it a public or social function.</p> + +<p>Who controls credit today? The bankers. And how do they control it? We +give it to them; we, the masses of the people, who take them our money +and leave it with them. A very little real money in hand becomes, under +our banking system, the basis of a great amount of imaginary money. The +Federal Reserve law requires that banks shall hold in reserve from +seven<a name="vol_ii_page_193" id="vol_ii_page_193"></a> to thirteen per cent of demand deposits; which means, in +substance, that when you leave a dollar with a banker, the banker is +allowed, under the law, to turn that dollar into anywhere from seven to +thirteen dollars, and lend those dollars out. In addition, he deposits +his reserves with the Federal Reserve bank, and that bank keeps only +thirty-five per cent in reserve—in other words, the seven to thirteen +imaginary dollars are multiplied again by three.</p> + +<p>Under the stress of war, this process of credit inflation has been +growing like the genii let out of the bottle. Under the law, the Federal +Reserve banks are supposed to hold a gold reserve of 40% to secure our +currency. But in December, 1919, these banks held a trifle over a +billion dollars' worth of gold, while our paper money was over four +billion. In addition, our banks have over thirty-three billions of +deposits, and all these are supposed to be secured by gold; in addition, +there are twenty-five billions of government bonds, and uncounted +billions of private notes, bonds and accounts, all supposed to be +payable in gold. So it appears that about one per cent of our +outstanding money is real, and the rest is imaginary—that is, it is +credit.</p> + +<p>The point for you to get clear is this: The great mass of this imaginary +money is created by law, and we have the power to abolish it or to +change the ownership of it at any time we develop the necessary +intelligence. Let us consider the ordinary paper money, the one and two +and five and ten dollar "bills," with which we plain people do most of +our business. These are Federal Reserve notes, and there are about three +billions of them; how do they come to be? Why, we grant to the national +banks by law the right to make this money; the government prints it for +them, and they put it into circulation. And what does it cost them? They +pay one per cent for the use of the money; in some cases they pay only +one-half of one per cent; and then they lend it to us, the people—and +what do they charge us? The answer is available in a recent report of +the U. S. Comptroller of the Currency, as follows:</p> + +<p>"I have the record of the loans made by one Texas national bank to a +hard-working woman who owned a little farm a few miles from town. She +borrowed, in the aggregate, $2,375, making about thirty loans during the +year. Listen to the details of the robbery: $162.50 for 30 days at 36 +per cent; $377. for 34 days at 44 per cent; $620.25 for 23 days at 77 +per cent;<a name="vol_ii_page_194" id="vol_ii_page_194"></a> $11. for 30 days at 120 per cent; $21.50 for 30 days at 90 +per cent; $33. for 2 days at 93 per cent; $27. for 15 days at 195 per +cent; $110. for 30 days at 120 per cent—that was to buy a horse for her +plowing; $20 for 48 days at 187 per cent; $6 for 10 days at 720 per +cent; $7 for 3 days at 2,000 per cent, and so on; every cent paid off by +what sweat and struggle only God knows."</p> + +<p>In Oklahoma, where the legal rate of interest is six per cent, with ten +per cent as the maximum under special contract, harassed farmers paid +all the way from 12 to 2400 per cent, with 40 per cent as the average. +In the case of one bank, the Comptroller proved that not a single +solitary loan had been made under fifteen per cent. He cited one +particular case that he asked to be regarded as typical. In the spring +the farmer went to the bank and arranged for a loan of $200. Out of his +necessity he was compelled to pay 55 per cent interest charge. Unable to +meet the note at maturity, he had to agree to 100 per cent interest in +order to get the renewal. The next renewal forced him up to 125 per +cent. For four years the thing went on, and all the drudgery of the +father and the mother and the six children could never keep down the +terrible interest or wipe out the principal. As a finish the bank +swooped down and sold him out; the wretched man, barefoot and hungry, +went to work clearing a swamp, caught pneumonia and died; the county +buried him, and neighbors raised a purse to send the widow and children +back to friends in Arkansas.</p> + +<p>This is the thing called the Money Trust in action, and this is the +power we have to take out of private control. It is our first job, and +all other jobs are in comparison hardly worth mentioning. How are we +going to do it?</p> + +<p>The farmers of North Dakota have shown one way. They took the control of +their state government into their own hands, and the most important and +significant thing they did was to start a public bank. The interests +fought them tooth and nail; not merely the interests of North Dakota, +not merely of the Northwest, but of the entire United States. They +fought them in the law courts, up to the United States Supreme Court, +which decided in favor of the people of North Dakota. Therefore, make +note of this vital fact—the most important single fact in the strategy +of the class struggle—every state can, under the constitution, have a +public bank; every city and town can have one, and no court can ever +forbid it!<a name="vol_ii_page_195" id="vol_ii_page_195"></a></p> + +<p>Therefore, I say to all Socialists, labor men and social reformers of +every shade and variety, nail at the top of your program of action the +demand for a public bank in your community, to take the control of +credit out of the hands of speculators and use it for the welfare of the +people. Make it your first provision that every dollar of public money +shall be deposited in this bank and every detail of public financing +handled by this bank; make it your second provision that the purpose of +this bank shall be to put all private banks out of business, and take +over their power for the people.</p> + +<p>At present, you understand, it is taken for granted that the first +purpose of the government is to foster the private credit system. Take, +for example, the postal savings bank. The private banks fought this for +a generation, and finally they allowed us to have it, on condition that +it should be turned into a device for collecting money for them. Our +postal bank turns over all its money to the private banks, at the +grotesque rate of two per cent interest; and recently I read of the +director of the postal bank appearing before a convention of bankers, +asking for some small favor, and humbly explaining that it was not his +idea to make the postal bank a rival of the private savings banks. Why +should he not do so? Let us nail it to our radical program that the +postal savings bank is to fight for business, just as do the private +banks, and lend its funds direct to the people on good security.</p> + +<p>Let our Federal banking system also become the servant of the public +welfare, and let its energy be devoted to breaking the strangle-hold of +predatory finance on our industry. Let the government issue all money, +and use it for the transfer of industry from private into public hands. +Do we want to socialize our railroads, our coal mines, our telegraphs +and telephones? Do we want to buy them, in order to avoid the wastes of +civil war and insurrection? We have agreed that we do; and here we have +the way of doing it. If the bankers can create, out of our willingness +to trust them, billions upon billions of imaginary money, then so can +we, the people of the United States, create money out of our willingness +to trust ourselves. And do not let anybody fool you for a single second +by talking about "fiat money" and "inflation of the currency." If you +are paying twice as much for everything as you did before the war, you +are paying it because the bankers have doubled the amount of money in +circulation—for that reason and that alone. That<a name="vol_ii_page_196" id="vol_ii_page_196"></a> double money the +bankers own; the only question now to be decided is, who is to own the +double money that will be created tomorrow?</p> + +<p>Make note of the fact that it costs nothing to start a public bank. If +you want to put the steel trust out of business by competition, you have +several hundred thousand dollars worth of rolling mills and ore land to +buy; but the banks can be put out of business by nothing but a law. The +material parts of a bank, the white marble columns and bronze railings +and mahogany trimmings, are as nothing compared with the inner soul of a +bank, its control of the life-blood of your business and mine; and this +we can have for the taking. We can keep our own "credit"; instead of +sending it to Wall Street, where speculators use it to bleed us white, +we can set it to building up our own community, under the direction of +officials whom we select. Also, we can have our gigantic national bank, +controlling all our thirty-three billions of dollars of deposits, and +likewise the hundreds of billions of credit built upon them.</p> + +<p>The first time you suggest this plan to a banker or business man, you +will be told that increase of money by the government does not benefit +labor or the general consumer; "inflation of the currency" causes prices +to go up correspondingly. To this I will furnish an effective reply: +that at the same time the government issues new money, the government +will also fix prices; and then watch the face of your banker or business +man! If he is a man who can really think, and is not just repeating like +a parrot the formulas he has learned from others, he will perceive that +the combination of currency inflation and price-fixing would catch him +as the two parts of a nut-cracker catch a nut; and he will know that you +can take the meat out of him any time you please. He may argue that it +is not fair; but point out to him that it is exactly what the big banks +and the trusts have been doing to us right along—increasing the amount +of money in circulation, and at the same time raising the prices we pay +for goods, and so taking out the meat from us nuts!</p> + +<p>We have agreed that we do not mean to be unfair either to the banker or +the manufacturer; we are simply going to stop their being unfair to us. +We are going to convince them that their power to catch us in a +nut-cracker is forever at an end. We allow them six per cent on their +investments, and guarantee them this by turning over to them some of our +new money—that is, government bonds. When we have thoroughly<a name="vol_ii_page_197" id="vol_ii_page_197"></a> convinced +them that they can't get any more, they will take these bonds and quit; +and thus simply, without violence or destruction of property, we shall +slide from our present system of commercial cannibalism into the new +co-operative commonwealth.</p> + +<p>We have had "cheap money" campaigns in the United States many times, and +as this book is written, it becomes evident that we are to have another. +Henry Ford is advocating the idea, and so is Thomas A. Edison. The +present writer would like to make plain that in supporting such a +program, he does it for one purpose, and one only—the taking over of +the industries by the community. The creation of state credit for that +purpose is the next step in the progress of human society; whereas the +creation of state credit for the continuance of the profit system is a +piece of futility amounting to imbecility. This distinction is +fundamental, and is the test by which to judge the usefulness of any new +program, and the intelligence of those who advocate it.<a name="vol_ii_page_198" id="vol_ii_page_198"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXX" id="CHAPTER_LXX"></a>CHAPTER LXX<br /><br /> +THE CONTROL OF INDUSTRY</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses various programs for the change from industrial +autocracy to industrial democracy.)</p></div> + +<p>The program of the railway workers for the democratic management of +their industry is embodied in the Plumb plan. You may learn about it by +addressing the weekly paper of the railway brotherhoods, which is called +"Labor," and is published in Washington, D. C. It appears that our +transportation industry can be at once socialized, because of a clause +in the constitution which gives the national government power over +"roads and communications." Through decades of mismanagement under the +system of private greed, the railroads have been brought to such a +financial condition that they will be forced into nationalization, +whenever we stop them from dipping their fingers into the public +treasury.</p> + +<p>Under the Plumb plan the government is to purchase the roads from their +present owners, paying with government bonds. The management is to be +under the control of a board consisting in part of representatives of +the government, and in part of the workers—this being a combination of +the methods of Socialism and Syndicalism. The same program can be +applied constitutionally to telegraphs and telephones, to interstate +trolley systems, express companies, oil pipe lines, and all other means +of interstate communication and distribution.</p> + +<p>The Plumb plan also deals with coal and steel and other great +industries. These could not be nationalized without a constitutional +amendment, but it appears that in the majority of the constitutions of +the states are provisions that all corporate charters are held subject +to the power of the legislature to amend, modify, or revoke the same. +That gives us a right to take over these corporations through state +action. The only preliminary is to elect state administrations which +will represent us, instead of representing the corporations. Also, most +state constitutions contain the provision that "no corporation shall<a name="vol_ii_page_199" id="vol_ii_page_199"></a> +issue its stocks or bonds, except for money, labor, or property actually +received." The word "labor" gives the opening wedge for the Plumb plan. +The state can purchase these industries, giving bonds in exchange, and +can issue to the workers labor stock, which stock will carry part +control of the industry.</p> + +<p>Also, the railroad brotherhoods have started their own bank, in +Cleveland, Ohio, and it is proving an enormous success. Make note of +this point; every large labor union can have its own bank, to finance +its industries and its propaganda. Stop and consider how preposterous it +is that the five million organized workers of the United States should +deposit their hundreds of millions of savings in capitalist banks, to be +used to finance private undertakings which crush unions and hold labor +in bondage. Let every big labor union have its own building, its own +banking and insurance business, its own vacation camp in the country, +its own school for training its future leaders. Also, let every labor +council in every big city start a labor daily, to tell the workers the +truth and point the way to freedom. Let every farmers' organization +follow suit; and let these groups get together, to exchange their +products upon a co-operative basis. Already the railway men are +arranging with the farmers, to buy the farm products and distribute them +co-operatively; they are getting together with the clothing workers, to +have the latter make clothing for them, and with the shoe-workers to +make shoes.</p> + +<p>This is the co-operative movement, which has become the largest single +industry in Great Britain, and is the backbone of industrial democracy +and sound radicalism. It is spreading rapidly in America now. It is +taking the money of the people out of the control of the profit system, +and diverting it into channels of public service. It is training men to +believe in brotherhood instead of in greed. It is giving them business +experience, so that when the time comes the taking over of our +industrial machine will not have to be done by amateurs, but by men who +know what co-operation is, and how to make a success of it.</p> + +<p>This work will go on more rapidly yet when the workers have united +politically, and brought into power a government which will assist them +instead of assisting the bankers. A most interesting program for the +development of working-class financial credit is known as the "Douglas +plan," which is advocated by a London weekly, the "New Age," and is +explained in<a name="vol_ii_page_200" id="vol_ii_page_200"></a> two books, called "Economic Democracy" and "Credit Power +and Democracy," by Douglas and Orage. This program is in brief that the +furnishing of credit shall become a function of organized labor, based +upon the fact that the true and ultimate basis of all credit is the +power of hand and brain labor to produce wealth. The labor unions, or +"guilds," shall pay the management of industry and pay capital for the +use of the industrial plant, and shall finance production and new +industrial development out of their "credit power," their ability to +promise production and to keep their promises.</p> + +<p>This "Douglas plan" seeks to break the Money Trust by the method of +Syndicalism. Another method of breaking it, through state regulation of +bank loans, you will find most completely set forth in an extremely able +book, "The Strangle Hold," by H. C. Cutting, an American business man, +whom you may address at San Lorenzo, California. Another method, +utilizing the third factor in industry, the consumer, is the method of +banking by consumers' unions. Such are the Raffeisen banks, widely known +in Germany, and a specimen of which exists in the single tax colony at +Arden, Delaware. Those who wish to know about the co-operative bank, or +other forms of co-operation, may apply to the Co-operative League of +America, 2 West 13th Street, New York, whose president is Dr. James P. +Warbasse. Information concerning public ownership may be had from the +Public Ownership League, 127 N. Dearborn Street, Chicago; also from the +Socialist party, 220 South Ashland Boulevard, Chicago, and from the +Bureau of Social Research of the Rand School of Social Science, New +York.</p> + +<p>Also, I ought to mention the very interesting plan for social +reconstruction set forth by Mr. King C. Gillette, inventor of the safety +razor. This plan you may find in your public library in two encyclopedic +volumes, "Gillette's Social Redemption," and "Gillette's World +Solution." The politician seeks to solve the industrial problem by means +of the state, and the labor leader seeks to solve it by the unions; it +is to be expected that Mr. Gillette, a capitalist, should seek to solve +it by means of the corporation. He points out that the modern "trust" is +the greatest instrument of production yet invented by man; and he asks +why the people should not form their own "trust," to handle their own +affairs, and to purchase and take over the industries from their present +private masters. It is interesting to note that Mr. Gillette's solution +is fully as radical and thorough-going as those<a name="vol_ii_page_201" id="vol_ii_page_201"></a> of the State Socialists +or the Syndicalists. The "People's Corporation" which he projects and +plans some day to launch upon the world would be a gigantic "consumers' +union," whose "credit power" would speedily dominate and absorb all +other powers in modern society; it would make us all stockholders, and +give us our share of the benefits of social productivity.<a name="vol_ii_page_202" id="vol_ii_page_202"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXXI" id="CHAPTER_LXXI"></a>CHAPTER LXXI<br /><br /> +THE NEW WORLD</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Describes the co-operative commonwealth, beginning with its money +aspects; the standard wage and its variations.)</p></div> + +<p>It has been indicated that the new society will be different in +different countries and in different parts of the same country, in +different industries and at different times. No one can predict exactly +what it will be, and anyone who tries to predict is unscientific. But +every man can work out his own ideas of the most economical and sensible +arrangements for a co-operative society, and in these final chapters I +set forth my ideas.</p> + +<p>One of the first things people ask is, "Will there be money in the new +society, or how will labor be rewarded and goods paid for?" I answer +that there will be money, and the business methods of the new society +will be so nearly the same as at present that in this respect you would +hardly realize there had been any change. The only difference will be +that in the new society you will be paid several times as much for your +labor; or, if you prefer to put it the other way, you will be able to +buy several times as much with your money. Why should we waste our time +working out systems of "credit-cards," when we already have a system in +the form of gold and silver coins and paper currency? Why should we +bother with "labor checks," when we have a banking and clearing-house +system, understood by everyone but the illiterate? The only difference +we shall make is that nobody can get gold and silver coins or paper +currency, except by performing labor to pay for them; nobody can have +money in the bank and draw checks against it, until he has rendered to +society an equivalent amount of service.</p> + +<p>When you have earned your money in the new world, you will spend it +wherever you please, and for whatever you please; the only difference +being that the price you pay will be the exact labor-cost of producing +that article, with no deduction for any form of exploitation. As I wrote +sixteen years ago in "The Industrial Republic," you will be able to get, +if you insist upon it, a seven-legged spider made of diamonds, and the +only<a name="vol_ii_page_203" id="vol_ii_page_203"></a> question society will ask is, Have you performed services +equivalent to the material and labor necessary to the creating of that +unusual article of commerce? Of course, society won't put it to you in +that complicated formula; it will simply ask, "Have you got the price?" +Which, you observe, is exactly the question society asks you at present.</p> + +<p>The next thing that everybody wants to know is, "Shall we all be paid +the same wages?" I answer, yes and no, because there will be three +systems of payment. There will be a basic wage, which everybody will get +for every kind of useful service necessary to production; this will be, +as it were, the foundation of our economic structure. On top of this +will be built a system of special payments for special services, which +are of an intellectual nature, and cannot be standardized and dealt with +wholesale. In addition, there will be for a time a third arrangement, +applying to agricultural work, which is in a different stage of +development, and to which different conditions apply.</p> + +<p>Let us take, first, our standard wage. The census of our Utopian +commonwealth reveals that we have ten million able-bodied workers +engaged in mining, manufacturing, and transportation; this including, of +course, office-work and management—everything that enters into these +industries. By scientific management, the best machinery, and the +elimination of all possible waste, we find that they produce eighty +million dollars worth of goods an hour. A portion of this we have to set +aside to pay for the raw materials which they do not produce, and for +the upkeep of the plant, and for margin of error—what our great +corporations call a surplus. We find that we have fifty million dollars +per hour left, and that means that we can pay for labor five dollars per +hour, or twenty dollars for the regular four-hour day. This is our +standard wage, received by all able-bodied workers.</p> + +<p>But quickly we find that our industries are not properly balanced. A +great many men want to work at the jobs which are clean and pleasant, +such as delivering mail, and very few want to work at washing dishes in +restaurants and cleaning the sewers. There is no way we can adjust this, +except by paying a higher wage, or by reducing the number of hours in +the working day, which is the same thing. The only other method would be +to have the state assign men to their work, and that would be +bureaucracy and slavery, the essence of everything we wish to get away +from in our co-operative commonwealth.<a name="vol_ii_page_204" id="vol_ii_page_204"></a></p> + +<p>What we shall have, so far as concerns our basic industries, is a +government department, registering with mathematical accuracy the +condition of supply and demand in all the industries of the country. Our +demand for shoes is increasing, for some reason or other; a thousand +more shoe-workers are needed, therefore the price of labor in the shoe +industry is increased five cents per day—or whatever amount will draw +that number of workers from other occupations. On the other hand, there +are too many people applying for the job of driving trucks, therefore we +reduce slightly the compensation for this work. There are more men who +want jobs in Southern California than in Alaska, therefore the payment +for the same grade of work in Alaska has to be higher. All this is not +merely speculation, it is not a matter of anybody's choice; it is an +automatic, self-adjusting system, subject to precise calculations. The +only change from our present system is from guesswork to exact +measurement. At present we do not know how many shoes our country will +require next season, neither do we know how many shoes are going to be +made, neither do we know how many people can make shoes, nor how many +would like to learn, nor how many would like to quit that job and take +to farming. It would be the simplest matter in the world to find out +these things—far simpler that it was to register all our possible +soldiers, and examine them physically and mentally, and train them and +feed them and ship them overseas to "can the Kaiser."</p> + +<p>Of course, we drafted the men for this war job; but in the new world +nobody is drafted for anything. It is any man's privilege to starve if +he feels like it; it is his privilege to go out into the mountains and +live on nuts and berries if he can find them. Nobody makes him go +anywhere, or makes him work at anything—unless, of course, he is a +convicted criminal. To the free citizen all that society has to say is, +if he buys any products, he must pay for those products with his own +labor, and not with some other man's labor. Of course, he may steal, or +cheat, as under capitalism; our new world has laws against stealing and +cheating, and does its best to enforce them. The difference between the +capitalist world and our world is merely that we make it impossible for +any man to get money <i>legally</i> without working.</p> + +<p>Under these conditions the average man wishes to work, and the only +question remaining is, how shall he work? If he wants to work by +himself, and in his own way, nobody objects<a name="vol_ii_page_205" id="vol_ii_page_205"></a> to it. He is able to buy +anything he pleases, whether raw materials or finished products. If he +wants to buy leather and make shoes after his own pattern, no one stops +him, and if he can find anyone to buy these shoes, he can earn his +living in that way. He is able to get land for as long a time as he +wants it, by paying to the state the full rental value of that land, and +if he wants to farm the land, he can do so, and sell his products. As a +matter of theory, he is perfectly free to hire others to farm the land +for him, or with him. There is no law to prevent it, neither is there +any law to prevent his renting a factory and buying machinery, and +hiring labor to make shoes.</p> + +<p>But, as a matter of practical fact, it is impossible for him to do this, +because the community is in the business of making shoes, and on an +enormous scale, with great factories run democratically by the workers, +and there is very small chance of any private business man being able to +draw the workers away from these factories. The community factories have +all the latest machinery; they apply the latest methods of scientific +management, and they turn out standard shoes at such a rate that private +competition is unthinkable. Of course, there may be some special kind of +shoes, involving an intellectual element, in which there can be private +competition. This kind of manufacture is covered in our second method of +payment; but before we discuss it, let us settle the problem of our most +important basic industry, which is agriculture.<a name="vol_ii_page_206" id="vol_ii_page_206"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXXII" id="CHAPTER_LXXII"></a>CHAPTER LXXII<br /><br /> +AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses the land in the new world, and how we foster +co-operative farming and co-operative homes.)</p></div> + +<p>Farming the land is a very ancient industry, and while its tools have +been improved, its social forms have been the same for a long time. The +worker on the land is conservative, and the Russian Bolsheviks, who +tried to rush their peasants into Communism, found that they had only +succeeded in stopping the production of food. We make no such blunder in +our new society. We have found a way to abolish speculation in land, and +exploitation based on land-ownership, while leaving the farmer free to +run his business in the old way if he wants to.</p> + +<p>In our new society we take the full rental value of all land which is +not occupied and used by the state. The farmer and the city dweller +alike "own" their land, in the sense that they have the use of it for as +long as they please, but they pay to the state the rental value of the +land, minus the improvements. So they cannot speculate in the land or +rent it out to others; they can only use it, and they only pay for what +they actually use. They may put improvements on the land, with full +assurance of having the use and benefit thereof, and they may sell the +improvements, and the new owner enters into possession, with no +obligation but to pay the rental value of the unimproved land to the +state.</p> + +<p>The farmer goes on raising his products, and if he wants to drive to +town and deliver them to his customers, he may do so; but he finds it +cheaper to market them through the great labor co-operatives and state +markets. As there is no longer any private interest involved in these +activities, no one has any interest in cheating him, and he gets the +full value of the products, less the cost of marketing. If the farmer +wishes to continue all his life in his old style individualistic method +of working the land, he is free to do so. But here is what he sees going +on within a few miles of his place:</p> + +<p>The state has bought a square mile of land, and has taken down the +fences and established an agricultural co-operative for<a name="vol_ii_page_207" id="vol_ii_page_207"></a> purposes of +experiment and demonstration. The farm is run under the direction of +experts; the soils are treated with exactly the right fertilizers for +each crop, the best paying crops are raised, the best seed is used, and +the best machinery. The workers of this new agricultural co-operative +receive the standard wage, and they live in homes specially built for +them, with all the conveniences made possible by wholesale production. +Also, these co-operators live in a democratic community; they determine +their own conditions of labor, being represented on the governing board, +along with the experts appointed by the state.</p> + +<p>The farmer watches this experiment, at first with suspicion; but he +finds that his sons have less suspicion than he has, and his sons keep +pointing out to him that their little farm is not making the standard +wage or anything like it; and, moreover, the standard wage is constantly +increasing, whereas, the price of farm-products is dropping. And here is +the state, ready to direct new co-operative ventures, inviting a score +of farmers in the community to combine and buy out the unwilling ones, +and establish a new co-operative. Sooner or later the old farmer gives +way; or he dies, and his sons belong to the new world.</p> + +<p>So ultimately we have our national agricultural system, in which all the +requirements of our people are studied, and all the possibilities of our +soil and climate, and the job of raising the exact quantities of food +that we need, both for our own use and for export, is worked out as one +problem. We know how much lumber we need, and we raise it on all our +hillsides and mountain slopes, and so protect ourselves from floods and +the denuding of our continent. We know where best to raise our wheat, +and where best to raise our potatoes and our cabbages, and we do not do +this by crude hand-labor, nor by the labor of women and children from +daybreak till dark. We have special machines that plant each crop, and +other machines that reap it or dig it out of the ground and prepare it +for market.</p> + +<p>A few days ago I read a discussion in the Chamber of Commerce of +Calcutta. Some one called attention to the wastes involved in the +current method of handling rubber. One consignment of rubber had been +sold more than three hundred separate times, and the cost of these +transactions amounted to three times the value of the rubber. This is +only one illustration, and I might quote a thousand. If you doubt my +figures as to the possibility of production in the new society, remind +yourself that a large percentage of the things you use<a name="vol_ii_page_208" id="vol_ii_page_208"></a> have been bought +and sold many scores of times before you get them. Consider the cabbage, +for which you pay six or eight cents a pound in the grocery store, and +for which the farmer gets, say, half a cent a pound.</p> + +<p>In this new world the state has an enormous income, derived from its tax +on land values. It no longer has to send around men once a year to ask +you how many diamond rings your wife has, and to tax you on your +honesty, if you have any. It no longer has to make its money by such +lying devices as a tariff, therefore its moral being is no longer +poisoned by a tariff-lobby. It taxes every citizen for the right to use +that which nature created, and leaves free from taxation that which the +citizens' own labor created; this kind of taxation is honest, and fair +to all, because no one can evade it. The state uses the proceeds of this +land tax in the public services, the libraries and research laboratories +and information bureaus; in free insurance against fire and flood and +tempest; and in a pension to every member of society above the working +age of fifty-five, or below the working age of eighteen. Of course, the +state might leave it to every man to save up for his old age, but not +all men are this wise, and the state cannot afford to let the unwise +ones starve. It is more convenient for the state to figure that all men, +or nearly all, are going to be old, and to hold back some of their money +while they are young and strong, in the certainty that when they are +old, they will appreciate this service. Also the state takes care of the +sick and incapacitated, and the mentally or physically defective. But we +do not leave these latter loose in the world to reproduce their defects; +we have in our new world some sense of responsibility to the future, and +there is nothing to which we devote more effort than making certain that +nothing unsound or abnormal is allowed entrance into life.</p> + +<p>The problem of the care of children is a complicated one, and our new +society is in process of solving it. We look back on the old world in +which the having of children was heavily taxed, in the form of an +obligation to care for these children until they were old enough to +work. Then the parents were allowed to exploit the labor of the +children, so that among the very poor the raising of children was a +business speculation, like the raising of slaves or poultry. But in our +new world we consider the interest of the child, and of the society in +which that child is to be a citizen. We decide that this society must +have citizens, and that the raising of the future citizens is a<a name="vol_ii_page_209" id="vol_ii_page_209"></a> work +just exactly as necessary and useful as the raising of a crop of +cabbages. Therefore, we pay a pension to all mothers while they are +raising and caring for children. At the same time we assert the right to +see that this money is wisely spent, and that the child is really cared +for. If it is neglected, we are quick to take it away from its parents, +and put it in one of our twenty-four-hour-a-day schools.</p> + +<p>We realize that the home is an ancient industry, even more ancient than +agriculture, and we do not try to socialize it all at once. But just as +we demonstrate to farmers that the individual farm does not pay, so we +demonstrate to mothers the wastefulness of the single laundry, the +single kitchen, the single nursery. We establish community laundries, +community kitchens, community nurseries, and invite our women to help in +these activities, and to learn there, under expert guidance, the +advantages of domestic co-operation. We convince them by showing better +results in the health and happiness of the children, and in the time and +strength of the mothers. So, little by little, we widen the field of +co-operative endeavor, and increase the total product of human labor and +the total enjoyment of human life.<a name="vol_ii_page_210" id="vol_ii_page_210"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXXIII" id="CHAPTER_LXXIII"></a>CHAPTER LXXIII<br /><br /> +INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTION</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses scientific, artistic and religious activities, as a +superstructure built upon the foundation of the standard wage.)</p></div> + +<p>Karl Kautsky, intellectual leader of the German Social-democracy, gives +in his book, "The Social Revolution," a useful formula as to the +organization of the future society. This formula is: "Communism in +material production, Anarchism in intellectual production." It will +repay us to study this statement, and see exactly what it means.</p> + +<p>Material production depends directly upon things; and as there is only a +limited quantity of things in the world, if any one person has more than +his share, he deprives some other person to that extent. So there have +to be strict laws concerning the distribution of material products. But +with intellectual things exactly the opposite is the case. There is no +limit in quantity, and any one person can have all he wants without +interfering with anybody else. Everybody in the world can perform a play +by Shakespeare, or play a sonata by Beethoven, and everybody can enjoy +it as much as he pleases without keeping other people from enjoying it +all they please. Also, material production can be standardized; we can +have great factories to turn out millions of boxes of matches, each +match like every other match, and the more alike they are the better. +But in intellectual affairs we want everyone to be different, or at +least we want everyone to be free to be different, and if some one can +become much better than the others, this is the most important kind of +production in the world, for he may make over our whole intellectual and +moral life.</p> + +<p>For the production of material things our new society has great +factories owned in common, and run by majority vote of the workers, and +we place the products of that factory at the disposal of all members of +society upon equal terms. That is our "Communism in material +production." On the other hand, in our intellectual production we leave +everybody free to live his own life, and to associate himself with +others of like aims, and we place as few restrictions as possible upon +their activities.<a name="vol_ii_page_211" id="vol_ii_page_211"></a> This is the method of free association, or "Anarchism +in intellectual production."</p> + +<p>Our problem would be simple if material and intellectual production +never had to mingle. But, as it happens, every kind of intellectual +production requires a certain amount of material, and every kind of +material production involves an intellectual element. Therefore, our two +methods have to be combined, and we have a complex problem which we have +to solve in a variety of different ways, and upon which we must +experiment with open minds and scientific temper.</p> + +<p>First, let us take the intellectual elements involved in the production +of purely material things, such as matches and shoes and soap. Let us +take invention. Naturally, we do not want to go on making matches and +shoes and soap in the same old way forever. On the contrary, we want to +stimulate all the workers in these industries to use their wits and +improve the processes in every possible way. The whole of society has an +interest in this, and the soap workers have an especial interest. Our +soap industry has an invention department, with a group of experts +appointed by the executive committee of the national council of soap +workers. All soap workers are taxed, say five cents a day, for the +support of this activity. Likewise the state contributes a generous sum +out of its income toward the work of soap research. In addition to this, +the soap industry offers prizes and scholarships for suggestions as to +the improvement of every detail of the work, and at meetings of every +local of soap workers somebody makes new suggestions as to methods of +stimulating their intellectual life—not merely as regards soap, but as +regards citizenship, and art and literature, and human life in general. +Our soap workers, you must understand, are no longer wage-slaves, +brutalized by toil and poverty; they are free citizens of a free +society. Our soap workers' local in every city has its own theatre and +concert hall and lecture bureau, and publishes its own magazine.</p> + +<p>Every industry has its immediate intellectual problems, its trade +journals in which these are discussed, and its research boards in which +they are worked out. The ambitions of the young workers in that industry +are concentrated upon getting into this intellectual part of their +trade. Examinations are held and tests are made to discover the most +competent men, and written suggestions are considered by boards of +control. It is, of course, of great importance to every worker that the +channels<a name="vol_ii_page_212" id="vol_ii_page_212"></a> of promotion should be kept open, and that the man who really +has inventive talent shall get, not merely distinction and promotion, +but financial reward, so that he may have time and materials to continue +his experiments.</p> + +<p>This research department, you perceive, is a sort of superstructure, +built upon the foundation of our standard wage; and this same simile +applies to numerous other forms of intellectual production. For example, +our community paper mills turn out paper, and our community printers are +prepared to turn out millions of books. How shall we determine what is +to be the intellectual content of these material books? There are many +different methods. First, there is the method of individualism. A man +has something to say, and he writes a book; he works in the soap +factory, and saves a part of his standard wage, and when he has money +enough he orders the community printers to print his book, and the +community booksellers to handle it for him, and the community postoffice +to deliver it for him. Again, a group of men organize themselves into an +association, or club, or scientific society, and publish books. The +Authors' League takes up the work of publishing the writings of its +members, and the Poetry Society does the same.</p> + +<p>This is the method of Anarchism, or free association. But there is no +reason why we should not have along side it the method of Socialism; +there is no reason why we should not have state publishing houses, just +as we have state universities and state libraries. The state should +certainly publish standard works of all sorts, bibles and dictionaries +and directories, and cheap editions of the classics. In this new world +our school boards are not chosen by business men for purposes of graft, +they are chosen by the people to educate our children; so it seems to us +perfectly natural that the National Educational Association should +conduct a publication department, and order the printing of the school +books which the children use.</p> + +<p>In the same way, anyone is free to write a play, or to put on a play, +and invite people to come and see it. But, like the individual farmers +and the individual mothers of families, the play-producer in our society +is in competition with great community enterprises, which set a high +standard and make competition difficult. The same thing applies to the +opera, and to concerts, and to all the arts and sciences. You can start +a private hospital if you wish, but you will be in competition with +public institutions, and you can only succeed if you are a man<a name="vol_ii_page_213" id="vol_ii_page_213"></a> of +genius—that is, if you have something to teach, too new and startling +for the public boards of control to recognize. You try your new method, +and it works, and that becomes a criticism of the public boards of +control, and before long the people by their votes turn out the old +board of control and put you in.</p> + +<p>That is politics, you say; but we in our new world do not use the word +politics as one of contempt. We really believe that public sentiment is +in the long run the best authority, and the appeal to public sentiment +is at once a social privilege and a social service. What we strive to do +is to clear the channels of appeal, and avoid favoritism and stagnation. +To that end we maintain, in every art and every science and every +department of human thought, endless numbers of centers of free, +independent, co-operative activity, so that every man who has an +inspiration, or a new idea, can find some group to support him or can +form a new group of his own.</p> + +<p>This is our "Anarchism in intellectual production," and it is the method +under which in capitalist society men organize all their clubs and +societies and churches. Devout members of the Roman Catholic Church will +be startled to be told that theirs is an Anarchist organization; but +nevertheless, such is the case. The Catholic Church owns a great deal of +property, and speculates in real estate, and to that extent it is a +capitalist institution. It holds a great many people by fear, and to +that extent it is a feudal institution. But in so far as members of the +church believe in it and love it and contribute of their free will to +its support, they are organizing by the method which all Anarchists +recommend and desire to apply to the whole of society. Anarchist clubs +and Christian churches are both free associations for the advocacy of +certain ideas, the only difference being in the ideas they advocate.</p> + +<p>In our new world such organizations have been multiplied many fold, and +form a vast superstructure of intellectual activity, built upon the +foundation of the standard wage. In this new world all the people are +free. They are free, not merely from oppression, but from the fear of +oppression; they have leisure and plenty, and they take part naturally +and simply in the intellectual life. The old, of course, have not got +over the dullness which a lifetime of drudgery impressed upon them, but +the young are growing up in a world without classes, and in which it +seems natural that everyone should be educated and everyone should have +ideas. They earn their standard wage,<a name="vol_ii_page_214" id="vol_ii_page_214"></a> and devote their spare time to +some form of intellectual or artistic endeavor, and spend their spare +money in paying writers and artists and musicians and actors to +stimulate and entertain them.</p> + +<p>These latter are the ways of distinction in our new society; these are +the paths to power. The only rich men in our world are the men who +produce intellectual goods; the great artists, orators, musicians, +actors and writers, who are free to serve or not to serve, as they see +fit, and can therefore hold up the public for any price they care to +charge. Just now there is eager discussion going on in our world as to +whether it is proper for an opera singer, or a moving picture star, or a +novelist, to make a million dollars. Our newspapers are full of +discussions of the question whether anyone can make a million dollars +honestly, and whether men of genius should exploit their public. Some +point out that our most eminent opera singer spends his millions in +endowing a conservatory of art; but others maintain that it would be +better if he lowered his prices of admission, and let the public use its +money in its own way. The extremists are busy founding what they call +the Ten-cent Society, whose members agree to boycott all singers and +actors who charge more than ten cents admission, and all moving picture +stars who receive more than a hundred thousand dollars a year for their +service. These "Ten-centers" do not object to paying the money, but they +object to the commercializing of art, and declare especially that the +moral effect of riches is such that no rich person should ever, under +any circumstances, be allowed to influence the youth of the nation. In +this some of the greatest writers join them, and renounce their +copyrights, and agree to accept a laureateship from some union of +workers, who pay them a generous stipend for the joy and honor of being +associated with their names. The greatest poet of our time began life as +a newsboy, and so the National Newsvenders' Society has adopted him, and +taken his name, and pays him ten thousand dollars a year for the +privilege of publishing his works.<a name="vol_ii_page_215" id="vol_ii_page_215"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_LXXIV" id="CHAPTER_LXXIV"></a>CHAPTER LXXIV<br /><br /> +MANKIND REMADE</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(Discusses human nature and its weaknesses, and what happens to +these in the new world.)</p></div> + +<p>We have briefly sketched the economic arrangements of the co-operative +commonwealth. Let us now consider what are the effects of these +arrangements upon the principal social diseases of capitalism.</p> + +<p>The first and most dreadful of capitalism's diseases is war, and the +economic changes here outlined have placed war, along with piracy and +slavery, among the half-forgotten nightmares of history. We have broken +the "iron ring," and are no longer dependent upon foreign concessions +and foreign markets for the preservation of our social system and the +aggrandizement of a ruling class. We can stay quietly at home and do our +own work, and as we produce nearly everything we need, we no longer have +to threaten our neighbors. Our neighbors know this, and therefore they +do not arm against us, and we have no pretext to arm against them. We +take toward all other civilized nations the attitude which we have taken +toward Canada for the past hundred years.</p> + +<p>We have a small and highly trained army, a few regiments of which are +located at strategic points over the country. This army we regard and +use as we do our fire department. When there is widespread damage by +fire or flood or storm or earthquake, we rush the army to the spot to +attend to the work of rescue and rebuilding. Also, we have a small navy +in international service; for, of course, we are no longer an +independent and self-centered nation; we have come to realize that we +are part of the world community, and have taken our place as one state +in the International Socialist Federation. We send our delegates to the +world parliament, and we place our resources at the disposal of the +world government. However, it now takes but a small army and navy to +preserve order in the world. We govern the backward nations, but the +economic arrangements of the world are such that we are no longer driven +to exploit and oppress them. We send them teachers instead of<a name="vol_ii_page_216" id="vol_ii_page_216"></a> soldiers, +and as there are really very few people in the world who fight for the +love of fighting, we have little difficulty in preserving peace. We pay +the backward peoples a fair price for their products which we need. Our +world government takes no money out of these countries, but spends it +for the benefit of those who live in the countries, to teach them and +train their young generations for self-government.</p> + +<p>Next, what are the effects of our new arrangements upon political +corruption and graft? The social revolution has broken the prestige of +wealth. Money will buy things, but it no longer buys power, the right to +rule other men; it no longer buys men's admiration. Everybody now has +money, and nobody is any longer afraid of starvation. It is no longer +the fashion to save money—any more than it is the fashion to carry +revolvers in drawing-rooms or to wear chain mail in place of +underclothing. So our political life is cleansed of the money influence. +People now get power by persuading their fellows, not by buying them or +threatening them. The world is no longer full of men ravenous for jobs, +and ready to sell their soul for a "position." So it is no longer +possible to build up a "machine" based on desire for office.</p> + +<p>The changes have resulted in an enormous intensification of our +political activities. We have endless meetings and debates; we have so +many propaganda societies that we cannot keep track of them. And some of +these societies, like the Catholic Church, have a large membership, and +large sums of money at their disposal. But a few experiments at carrying +elections by a "campaign-chest" have convinced everybody that to have +the facts on your side is the only permanent way to political power. Our +new society is jealous of attempts to establish any sort of ruling +class, and the surest way to discredit yourself is to advocate any form +of barrier against freedom of discussion, or the right of the people's +will to prevail.</p> + +<p>Next, what is the status of crime? We have too recently escaped from +capitalism to have been able to civilize entirely our slum population, +and we still have occasional crimes of violence, especially crimes of +passion. But we have almost entirely eliminated those classes of crime +which had to do with property, and we have discovered that this was +ninety-five per cent of all crime. We have eliminated them by the simple +device of making them no longer profitable. Anybody can go into our +community factories, and under clean and attractive working conditions,<a name="vol_ii_page_217" id="vol_ii_page_217"></a> +and without any loss of prestige or social position, can earn the means +of satisfying his reasonable wants by three hours work a day. Almost +everybody finds this easier than stealing or cheating.</p> + +<p>But more important yet, as a factor in abolishing crime, is the +abolition of class domination and the prestige of wealth. We no longer +have in our community a ruling class which lives without working, and +which offers to the weak-minded and viciously inclined the perpetual +example of luxury. We no longer set much store on jewels and fine +raiment; we do not make costly things, except for public purposes, where +all may enjoy them; and nobody stores great quantities of money, because +everyone has a guarantee of security from the state. So we are gradually +putting our policemen and jailers and judges and lawyers to constructive +work.</p> + +<p>Next, what about disease? The diseases of poverty are entirely done away +with. We are now able to apply the knowledge of science to the whole +community, and so we no longer have to do with tuberculosis and typhoid, +or with rickets and anæmia in children, or with heavy infant mortality. +We have sterilized our unfit, the degenerates and the defectives, and so +do not have to reckon with millions of children from these wretched +stocks. We now give to the question of public health that prominence +which in the old days we used to give to war and the suppression of +crime and social protest. Our public health officers now replace our +generals and admirals, and we really obey their orders.</p> + +<p>Next, as to prostitution. Just as in the case of crime, we are still too +close to capitalism not to have among us the victims of social +depravity, both men and women. We still have a great deal of vice which +springs from untrained animal impulse, and we have some cultivated and +highly sophisticated pornography. But we have entirely done away with +commercial vice, and we have done it by cutting the root which nourished +it. Women in our communities are really free; and by that we do not mean +the empty political freedom which existed in the days of wage +slavery—we mean that women are permanently delivered from economic +inferiority, by the recognition on the part of the state of the money +value of their special kind of work, the bearing and training of +children. This kind of work not merely receives the standard wage, it +also receives the best surgical and nursing treatment free. Housework +and home-making are<a name="vol_ii_page_218" id="vol_ii_page_218"></a> legally recognized services; and the woman before +marriage and after her children have been nursed is free to go into the +community factories and earn for herself the standard wage, with no loss +of social position. Consequently, no woman sells her sex, and no man +buys it.</p> + +<p>This does not mean, of course, that we have solved the sex problem in +our new society. There are two great social problems with which we have +to deal, the first of these being the sex problem, and the second the +race problem. Our scientists are occupied with eugenics, and we are +finding out how to guide our young people in marriage, so that our race +may be built up, and the ravages of capitalism remedied as quickly as +possible. Also we are trying to find out the laws of happiness and +health in love. We are founding societies for the purpose of protecting +love, and, as hinted in the Book of Love, we have a determined social +struggle between two groups of women—the mother-women and the +mistress-women—those who take love gravely, as a means of improving the +race, and those who take it as a decoration, a form of play. Our men are +embarrassed by having to choose between these groups, and occupy +themselves with trying to keep the struggle from turning into civil war.</p> + +<p>Second, the race problem. Our economic changes have, of course, done +away with some of the bitterest phases of this strife. White workingmen +in the North no longer mob and murder negro workingmen for taking their +jobs, and in the South our land values tax prevents the landlord from +exploiting either white or negro labor. But our white race is still +irresistibly bent upon preserving its integrity of blood, and the more +far-seeing among the negroes have come to realize that there can never +be any real happiness for them in a society where they are denied the +higher social privileges. There is a movement for the development of a +genuine Negro Republic in Africa, and for mass emigration. Also there is +a proposition, soon to be settled at an election, for the dividing of +the United States into three districts upon racial lines. First, there +are to be, in the Far South, three or four states which are inhabited +and governed solely by negroes, and to which white men may come only as +temporary visitors; a large group of states in the North which are white +states, and to which negroes may come only as visitors; and finally, a +middle group of states, in which both whites and black are allowed to +live, as at present, but with<a name="vol_ii_page_219" id="vol_ii_page_219"></a> the proviso that no one may live there +who takes part in any form of racial strife or agitation. This program +gives to race-conscious negroes their own land, their own civilization, +their own chance of self-realization; it gives to race-conscious white +men the same opportunity; and it leaves to those who are not troubled by +the problem, a country where black and white may dwell in quiet good +fellowship.</p> + +<p>Finally, what has been the effect of our economic changes upon the +purely personal vices which gave us so much trouble and unhappiness in +the old days? What, for example, has been the effect upon vanity? You +should see our new crop of children in our high schools! There are no +longer any social classes among them; the rich ones do not arrive in +private automobiles, to make the poor ones envious, and they do not +isolate themselves in little snobbish cliques. They arrive in community +automobiles, and all wear uniforms—one of the simple devices by which +we repress the impulse of the young toward display of personal egotism. +They are all full of health and happy play, and their heads are busily +occupied with interesting ideas. Our girls are trained to thinking, +instead of to personal adornment; they are developing their minds, +instead of catching a rich husband by sexual charms. So we have been +able, in a single generation of training, to make a real and appreciable +difference in the amount of vanity and self-consciousness to be found +among our young people.</p> + +<p>And the same thing applies to a score of other undesirable qualities, +which, under the system of competitive commercialism, were +overstimulated in human beings. In those old days everyone was seeking +his own survival, and certain qualities which had survival value became +the principal characteristics of our race. Those qualities were greed +and persistence in acquisitiveness, cunning and subtlety, also bragging +and self-assertiveness. In that old world people destroyed their fellows +in order to make their own safety and power; they wasted goods in order +to be esteemed, to preserve what they called their "social position." +But now we have cut the roots of all these vile weeds. We have so +adjusted the business relationships of men that we do not have to have +hysterical religious revivals in order to keep the human factors alive +in their hearts. We have established it as a money fact, which everyone +quickly realizes, that it pays better to co-operate; there is more +profit and less bother in being of service to others. So we have +prepared a soil in<a name="vol_ii_page_220" id="vol_ii_page_220"></a> which virtues grow instead of vices, and we find +that people become decent and kindly and helpful without exhortation, +and with no more moral effort than the average man can comfortably make. +Of course, we have still personal vices to combat, and new virtues to +discover and to propagate; but this has to do with the future, whereas +we are here confining ourselves to those things which have been +demonstrated in our new society.<a name="vol_ii_page_221" id="vol_ii_page_221"></a></p> + +<h2><a name="INDEX_VOL_II" id="INDEX_VOL_II"></a>INDEX</h2> + +<p class="cb"> +<a href="#vol_ii_A">A</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_B">B</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_C">C</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_D">D</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_E">E</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_F">F</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_G">G</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_H">H</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_I">I</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_J">J</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_K">K</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_L">L</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_M">M</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_N">N</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_O">O</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_P">P</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_Q">Q</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_R">R</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_S">S</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_T">T</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_U">U</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_V">V</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_W">W</a>, +<a href="#vol_ii_Y">Y</a> + +</p> + +<p class="nind"> +<a name="vol_ii_A" id="vol_ii_A"></a>Abortion, 6<a href="#vol_ii_page_001">1</a><br /> +Abortions, <a href="#vol_ii_page_030">30</a><br /> +Advertising, <a href="#vol_ii_page_163">163</a><br /> +Agricultural co-operative, <a href="#vol_ii_page_206">206</a><br /> +Anarchism, <a href="#vol_ii_page_210">210</a><br /> +Anarchist, <a href="#vol_ii_page_089">89</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_090">90</a><br /> +Anarchy, <a href="#vol_ii_page_172">172</a><br /> +Anglo-Saxon, <a href="#vol_ii_page_062">62</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_111">111</a><br /> +"Appeal to Reason", <a href="#vol_ii_page_149">149</a><br /> +Aristocratic doctrine, <a href="#vol_ii_page_116">116</a><br /> +Armour, <a href="#vol_ii_page_128">128</a><br /> +Atherton, Gertrude, <a href="#vol_ii_page_087">87</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_B" id="vol_ii_B"></a>Babies, <a href="#vol_ii_page_063">63</a><br /> +Bachelorhood, <a href="#vol_ii_page_052">52</a><br /> +Bacon, Francis, <a href="#vol_ii_page_051">51</a><br /> +Banking system, <a href="#vol_ii_page_192">192</a><br /> +Bankruptcy, <a href="#vol_ii_page_162">162</a><br /> +Barbarism, <a href="#vol_ii_page_124">124</a><br /> +Barnum, P. T., <a href="#vol_ii_page_027">27</a><br /> +Berkman, Alexander, <a href="#vol_ii_page_173">173</a><br /> +Biology, <a href="#vol_ii_page_103">103</a><br /> +Birth control, <a href="#vol_ii_page_061">61</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_076">76</a><br /> +Birth Control Review, <a href="#vol_ii_page_064">64</a><br /> +Blatchford, Robert, <a href="#vol_ii_page_055">55</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_161">161</a><br /> +"Blind" love, <a href="#vol_ii_page_058">58</a><br /> +Bolsheviks, <a href="#vol_ii_page_172">172</a><br /> +Breach of promise suit, <a href="#vol_ii_page_091">91</a><br /> +Brothel, <a href="#vol_ii_page_066">66</a><br /> +Brothels, <a href="#vol_ii_page_031">31</a><br /> +Burbank, Luther, <a href="#vol_ii_page_099">99</a><br /> +Business man, <a href="#vol_ii_page_143">143</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_C" id="vol_ii_C"></a>Capital, <a href="#vol_ii_page_158">158</a><br /> +Capitalism, <a href="#vol_ii_page_136">136</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_168">168</a><br /> +Capitalists, <a href="#vol_ii_page_142">142</a><br /> +Carnegie, <a href="#vol_ii_page_168">168</a><br /> +Catholic Church, <a href="#vol_ii_page_213">213</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_216">216</a><br /> +Celibacy, <a href="#vol_ii_page_051">51</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_052">52</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_064">64</a><br /> +Chastity, <a href="#vol_ii_page_051">51</a><br /> +Chattel slavery, <a href="#vol_ii_page_186">186</a><br /> +Childbirths, <a href="#vol_ii_page_070">70</a><br /> +Children, <a href="#vol_ii_page_070">70</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_072">72</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_085">85</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_208">208</a><br /> +Christianity, <a href="#vol_ii_page_115">115</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_133">133</a><br /> +"Clarion", <a href="#vol_ii_page_031">31</a><br /> +Class struggle, <a href="#vol_ii_page_133">133</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_177">177</a><br /> +Clay, Henry, <a href="#vol_ii_page_186">186</a><br /> +Coleridge, <a href="#vol_ii_page_085">85</a><br /> +"Collier's Weekly", <a href="#vol_ii_page_122">122</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_163">163</a><br /> +Committee on Waste, <a href="#vol_ii_page_160">160</a><br /> +Commune, <a href="#vol_ii_page_129">129</a><br /> +Communism, <a href="#vol_ii_page_010">10</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_170">170</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_210">210</a><br /> +Compensation, <a href="#vol_ii_page_179">179</a><br /> +Competition, <a href="#vol_ii_page_108">108</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_127">127</a><br /> +Competitive wage system, <a href="#vol_ii_page_148">148</a><br /> +"Complex", <a href="#vol_ii_page_049">49</a><br /> +Comstock, Anthony, <a href="#vol_ii_page_020">20</a><br /> +Confiscation, <a href="#vol_ii_page_179">179</a><br /> +Congress, <a href="#vol_ii_page_138">138</a><br /> +Contraception, <a href="#vol_ii_page_061">61</a><br /> +Co-operation, <a href="#vol_ii_page_109">109</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_199">199</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_200">200</a><br /> +Coquetry, <a href="#vol_ii_page_038">38</a><br /> +Corporation, <a href="#vol_ii_page_127">127</a><br /> +Courtship, <a href="#vol_ii_page_091">91</a><br /> +Credit, <a href="#vol_ii_page_152">152</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_154">154</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_192">192</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_200">200</a><br /> +Credit-cards, <a href="#vol_ii_page_202">202</a><br /> +Crime, <a href="#vol_ii_page_164">164</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_216">216</a><br /> +Culture, <a href="#vol_ii_page_062">62</a><br /> +Cutting, H. C., <a href="#vol_ii_page_200">200</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_D" id="vol_ii_D"></a>Dances, <a href="#vol_ii_page_015">15</a><br /> +Debs, Eugene V., <a href="#vol_ii_page_155">155</a><br /> +Degeneration, <a href="#vol_ii_page_121">121</a><br /> +"Demi-monde", <a href="#vol_ii_page_080">80</a><br /> +Democratic doctrine, <a href="#vol_ii_page_115">115</a><br /> +Dictatorship, <a href="#vol_ii_page_180">180</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_183">183</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_185">185</a><br /> +Dill, James B., <a href="#vol_ii_page_025">25</a><br /> +Disarmament, <a href="#vol_ii_page_157">157</a><br /> +Discouragement, <a href="#vol_ii_page_164">164</a><br /> +Disease, <a href="#vol_ii_page_217">217</a><br /> +Divorce, <a href="#vol_ii_page_032">32</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_093">93</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_097">97</a><br /> +Double standard, <a href="#vol_ii_page_005">5</a><br /> +"Douglas plan", <a href="#vol_ii_page_199">199</a><br /> +"Dumping", <a href="#vol_ii_page_152">152</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_E" id="vol_ii_E"></a>Economic evolution, <a href="#vol_ii_page_123">123</a><br /> +Economic man, <a href="#vol_ii_page_108">108</a><br /> +Emerson, <a href="#vol_ii_page_186">186</a><br /> +Emulation, <a href="#vol_ii_page_112">112</a><br /> +Engagements, <a href="#vol_ii_page_072">72</a><br /> +England, <a href="#vol_ii_page_120">120</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_156">156</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_175">175</a><br /> +Eugenics, 58<a name="vol_ii_page_222" id="vol_ii_page_222"></a><br /> +Evolution, <a href="#vol_ii_page_122">122</a><br /> +Exogamy, <a href="#vol_ii_page_105">105</a><br /> +Exploitation, <a href="#vol_ii_page_181">181</a><br /> +Exploiting, <a href="#vol_ii_page_148">148</a><br /> +Exports, <a href="#vol_ii_page_153">153</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_F" id="vol_ii_F"></a>Factory system, <a href="#vol_ii_page_129">129</a><br /> +Farming, <a href="#vol_ii_page_206">206</a><br /> +"Favorable balance", <a href="#vol_ii_page_151">151</a><br /> +Fear, <a href="#vol_ii_page_122">122</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_164">164</a><br /> +Federal Reserve Act, <a href="#vol_ii_page_154">154</a><br /> +Feminist, <a href="#vol_ii_page_069">69</a><br /> +Feudal stage, <a href="#vol_ii_page_124">124</a><br /> +Fires, <a href="#vol_ii_page_163">163</a><br /> +Foreign trade, <a href="#vol_ii_page_151">151</a><br /> +"Free love", <a href="#vol_ii_page_044">44</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_087">87</a><br /> +"Free lover", <a href="#vol_ii_page_092">92</a><br /> +France, <a href="#vol_ii_page_175">175</a><br /> +France, Anatole, <a href="#vol_ii_page_044">44</a><br /> +Freud, <a href="#vol_ii_page_104">104</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_G" id="vol_ii_G"></a>Gens, <a href="#vol_ii_page_009">9</a><br /> +Germany, <a href="#vol_ii_page_155">155</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_156">156</a><br /> +Gillette, King C., <a href="#vol_ii_page_200">200</a><br /> +Goldman, Emma, <a href="#vol_ii_page_173">173</a><br /> +Gonorrhea, <a href="#vol_ii_page_030">30</a><br /> +Goode, Mary J., <a href="#vol_ii_page_041">41</a><br /> +Government, <a href="#vol_ii_page_166">166</a><br /> +"Graft", <a href="#vol_ii_page_127">127</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_216">216</a><br /> +"Great Adventure", <a href="#vol_ii_page_188">188</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_H" id="vol_ii_H"></a>Hammurabi, <a href="#vol_ii_page_078">78</a><br /> +"Hamon case", <a href="#vol_ii_page_026">26</a><br /> +"Hard times", <a href="#vol_ii_page_144">144</a><br /> +Hardy, <a href="#vol_ii_page_013">13</a><br /> +Harris, Frank, <a href="#vol_ii_page_021">21</a><br /> +"High life", <a href="#vol_ii_page_023">23</a><br /> +Home, <a href="#vol_ii_page_042">42</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_209">209</a><br /> +Honeymoon, <a href="#vol_ii_page_056">56</a><br /> +Hoover, Herbert, <a href="#vol_ii_page_160">160</a><br /> +House of Commons, <a href="#vol_ii_page_137">137</a><br /> +Huguenots, <a href="#vol_ii_page_134">134</a><br /> +Human nature, <a href="#vol_ii_page_099">99</a><br /> +Hunger, <a href="#vol_ii_page_122">122</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_I" id="vol_ii_I"></a>Ideals, <a href="#vol_ii_page_132">132</a><br /> +Imports, <a href="#vol_ii_page_153">153</a><br /> +Income tax, <a href="#vol_ii_page_143">143</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_188">188</a><br /> +Industrial evolution, <a href="#vol_ii_page_126">126</a><br /> +Infant, <a href="#vol_ii_page_103">103</a><br /> +Infanticide, <a href="#vol_ii_page_061">61</a><br /> +Inflation, <a href="#vol_ii_page_196">196</a><br /> +Inheritance tax, <a href="#vol_ii_page_188">188</a><br /> +"Ingenues", <a href="#vol_ii_page_019">19</a><br /> +Instinct, <a href="#vol_ii_page_057">57</a><br /> +Insurance, <a href="#vol_ii_page_163">163</a><br /> +Intellectual production, <a href="#vol_ii_page_211">211</a><br /> +"Iron ring", <a href="#vol_ii_page_158">158</a><br /> +Island, <a href="#vol_ii_page_145">145</a><br /> +I. W. W., <a href="#vol_ii_page_169">169</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_J" id="vol_ii_J"></a>James, William, <a href="#vol_ii_page_016">16</a><br /> +Jealousy, <a href="#vol_ii_page_089">89</a><br /> +Jews, <a href="#vol_ii_page_127">127</a> +<br />v +<a name="vol_ii_K" id="vol_ii_K"></a>Kautsky, Karl, <a href="#vol_ii_page_210">210</a><br /> +"King Coal", <a href="#vol_ii_page_139">139</a><br /> +Kropotkin, <a href="#vol_ii_page_109">109</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_129">129</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_173">173</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_L" id="vol_ii_L"></a>Labor, <a href="#vol_ii_page_158">158</a><br /> +Labor checks, <a href="#vol_ii_page_202">202</a><br /> +Labor union, <a href="#vol_ii_page_199">199</a><br /> +Laissez faire, <a href="#vol_ii_page_110">110</a><br /> +Land tax, <a href="#vol_ii_page_190">190</a><br /> +Land titles, <a href="#vol_ii_page_179">179</a><br /> +Land values, <a href="#vol_ii_page_208">208</a><br /> +Late marriage, <a href="#vol_ii_page_067">67</a><br /> +Lecky, <a href="#vol_ii_page_006">6</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_033">33</a><br /> +Leviticus, <a href="#vol_ii_page_078">78</a><br /> +Liberty motor, <a href="#vol_ii_page_164">164</a><br /> +London, Jack, <a href="#vol_ii_page_062">62</a><br /> +Los Angeles Times, <a href="#vol_ii_page_157">157</a><br /> +Love, <a href="#vol_ii_page_034">34</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_047">47</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_100">100</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_112">112</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_218">218</a><br /> +Lust, <a href="#vol_ii_page_048">48</a><br /> +Luther, Martin, <a href="#vol_ii_page_129">129</a><br /> +Luxury, <a href="#vol_ii_page_060">60</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_M" id="vol_ii_M"></a>Machinery, <a href="#vol_ii_page_149">149</a><br /> +"Magic gestures", <a href="#vol_ii_page_104">104</a><br /> +Magna Carta, <a href="#vol_ii_page_134">134</a><br /> +Malthusian law, <a href="#vol_ii_page_108">108</a><br /> +Markham, Edwin, <a href="#vol_ii_page_139">139</a><br /> +Marquesas Islands, <a href="#vol_ii_page_033">33</a><br /> +Marriage, <a href="#vol_ii_page_004">4</a><br /> +Marriage club, <a href="#vol_ii_page_071">71</a><br /> +Marriage market, <a href="#vol_ii_page_068">68</a><br /> +Marx, Karl, <a href="#vol_ii_page_132">132</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_138">138</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_176">176</a><br /> +Materialistic interpretation, 132<a name="vol_ii_page_223" id="vol_ii_page_223"></a><br /> +Material production <a href="#vol_ii_page_210">210</a><br /> +Maternity endowment <a href="#vol_ii_page_079">79</a><br /> +Meredith, George <a href="#vol_ii_page_043">43</a><br /> +"Merrie England" <a href="#vol_ii_page_161">161</a><br /> +Metchnikoff, Elie <a href="#vol_ii_page_033">33</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_046">46</a><br /> +Mexico <a href="#vol_ii_page_121">121</a><br /> +Middle class <a href="#vol_ii_page_176">176</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_186">186</a><br /> +Minor, Robert <a href="#vol_ii_page_173">173</a><br /> +Mistress <a href="#vol_ii_page_012">12</a><br /> +Money <a href="#vol_ii_page_037">37</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_192">192</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_202">202</a><br /> +Money Trust <a href="#vol_ii_page_194">194</a><br /> +Monogamy <a href="#vol_ii_page_005">5</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_083">83</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_090">90</a><br /> +Moors <a href="#vol_ii_page_134">134</a><br /> +Moralists <a href="#vol_ii_page_059">59</a><br /> +Morgan <a href="#vol_ii_page_128">128</a><br /> +Mother's pension <a href="#vol_ii_page_079">79</a><br /> +Moving pictures <a href="#vol_ii_page_017">17</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_N" id="vol_ii_N"></a>Negro <a href="#vol_ii_page_218">218</a><br /> +Negroes <a href="#vol_ii_page_116">116</a><br /> +Neuroses <a href="#vol_ii_page_105">105</a><br /> +Neurotics <a href="#vol_ii_page_103">103</a><br /> +North Dakota <a href="#vol_ii_page_194">194</a><br /> +North, Luke <a href="#vol_ii_page_188">188</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_O" id="vol_ii_O"></a>O'Brien, Frederick <a href="#vol_ii_page_010">10</a><br /> +Oedipus complex <a href="#vol_ii_page_104">104</a><br /> +"Open-shop" <a href="#vol_ii_page_177">177</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_P" id="vol_ii_P"></a>Panic <a href="#vol_ii_page_154">154</a><br /> +Parasitism <a href="#vol_ii_page_074">74</a><br /> +Passion <a href="#vol_ii_page_058">58</a><br /> +Permanence <a href="#vol_ii_page_087">87</a><br /> +Piracy <a href="#vol_ii_page_111">111</a><br /> +Pity <a href="#vol_ii_page_074">74</a><br /> +Plumb plan <a href="#vol_ii_page_198">198</a><br /> +Political evolution <a href="#vol_ii_page_123">123</a><br /> +Political revolution <a href="#vol_ii_page_125">125</a><br /> +Politics <a href="#vol_ii_page_213">213</a><br /> +Pornography <a href="#vol_ii_page_020">20</a><br /> +Postal savings bank <a href="#vol_ii_page_195">195</a><br /> +Poverty <a href="#vol_ii_page_040">40</a><br /> +Primitive man <a href="#vol_ii_page_009">9</a><br /> +Privilege <a href="#vol_ii_page_036">36</a><br /> +Professor Sumner <a href="#vol_ii_page_122">122</a><br /> +Profit system <a href="#vol_ii_page_148">148</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_158">158</a><br /> +"Progressive polygamy" <a href="#vol_ii_page_090">90</a><br /> +Proletariat <a href="#vol_ii_page_142">142</a><br /> +Promiscuity <a href="#vol_ii_page_087">87</a><br /> +Property marriage <a href="#vol_ii_page_044">44</a><br /> +Prosperity <a href="#vol_ii_page_144">144</a><br /> +Prostitute <a href="#vol_ii_page_006">6</a><br /> +Prostitution <a href="#vol_ii_page_004">4</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_031">31</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_041">41</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_217">217</a><br /> +Proudhon <a href="#vol_ii_page_179">179</a><br /> +Psycho-analysis <a href="#vol_ii_page_049">49</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_103">103</a><br /> +Public bank <a href="#vol_ii_page_194">194</a><br /> +Publishing <a href="#vol_ii_page_212">212</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_Q" id="vol_ii_Q"></a>Quick, Herbert <a href="#vol_ii_page_165">165</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_R" id="vol_ii_R"></a>Race prejudice <a href="#vol_ii_page_062">62</a><br /> +Race problem <a href="#vol_ii_page_218">218</a><br /> +Racial immaturity <a href="#vol_ii_page_116">116</a><br /> +Raffeisen bank <a href="#vol_ii_page_200">200</a><br /> +Reeve, Sidney A. <a href="#vol_ii_page_160">160</a><br /> +Republic <a href="#vol_ii_page_125">125</a><br /> +Research <a href="#vol_ii_page_212">212</a><br /> +"Resurrection" <a href="#vol_ii_page_053">53</a><br /> +Revolt <a href="#vol_ii_page_134">134</a><br /> +Ricardo <a href="#vol_ii_page_108">108</a><br /> +Richardson, Dorothy <a href="#vol_ii_page_026">26</a><br /> +Ring <a href="#vol_ii_page_148">148</a><br /> +Robinson, Dr. William, J, <a href="#vol_ii_page_021">21</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_030">30</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_070">70</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_077">77</a><br /> +Roman Catholic church <a href="#vol_ii_page_090">90</a><br /> +"Romance" <a href="#vol_ii_page_091">91</a><br /> +"Romantic" love <a href="#vol_ii_page_055">55</a><br /> +Roosevelt <a href="#vol_ii_page_061">61</a><br /> +Rulers <a href="#vol_ii_page_119">119</a><br /> +Russia <a href="#vol_ii_page_129">129</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_185">185</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_S" id="vol_ii_S"></a>Sanger, Margaret <a href="#vol_ii_page_063">63</a><br /> +School of marriage <a href="#vol_ii_page_075">75</a><br /> +Selection <a href="#vol_ii_page_008">8</a><br /> +Sex <a href="#vol_ii_page_008">8</a><br /> +Sex education <a href="#vol_ii_page_072">72</a><br /> +Sex impulse <a href="#vol_ii_page_046">46</a><br /> +Sex problem <a href="#vol_ii_page_218">218</a><br /> +Sex urge <a href="#vol_ii_page_086">86</a><br /> +Sex war <a href="#vol_ii_page_081">81</a><br /> +Shelley <a href="#vol_ii_page_059">59</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_089">89</a><br /> +"She-towns" <a href="#vol_ii_page_029">29</a><br /> +Shop management <a href="#vol_ii_page_168">168</a><br /> +Sienkiewicz <a href="#vol_ii_page_013">13</a><br /> +Sims, District Attorney <a href="#vol_ii_page_028">28</a><br /> +Single tax <a href="#vol_ii_page_188">188</a><br /> +Slavery <a href="#vol_ii_page_010">10</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_126">126</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_136">136</a><br /> +"Smart set" <a href="#vol_ii_page_024">24</a><br /> +Smith, Adam <a href="#vol_ii_page_108">108</a><br /> +Snobbery 61<a name="vol_ii_page_224" id="vol_ii_page_224"></a><br /> +Socialism, <a href="#vol_ii_page_166">166</a><br /> +Social revolution, <a href="#vol_ii_page_128">128</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_147">147</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_175">175</a><br /> +Soviets, <a href="#vol_ii_page_130">130</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_171">171</a><br /> +"Speeding up", <a href="#vol_ii_page_138">138</a><br /> +Spencer, Herbert, <a href="#vol_ii_page_122">122</a><br /> +Spirituality, <a href="#vol_ii_page_064">64</a><br /> +Sport, <a href="#vol_ii_page_113">113</a><br /> +Standard wage, <a href="#vol_ii_page_203">203</a><br /> +Steel Trust, <a href="#vol_ii_page_137">137</a><br /> +Stopes, Dr. Marie C., <a href="#vol_ii_page_077">77</a><br /> +Strikes, <a href="#vol_ii_page_162">162</a><br /> +Syndicalism, <a href="#vol_ii_page_167">167</a><br /> +Syphilis, <a href="#vol_ii_page_030">30</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_T" id="vol_ii_T"></a>Tabu, <a href="#vol_ii_page_009">9</a><br /> +Tariff, <a href="#vol_ii_page_153">153</a><br /> +Taxes, <a href="#vol_ii_page_191">191</a><br /> +Tennyson, <a href="#vol_ii_page_038">38</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_120">120</a><br /> +"The Brass Check", <a href="#vol_ii_page_031">31</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_137">137</a><br /> +"The Conquest of Bread", <a href="#vol_ii_page_173">173</a><br /> +"The Cost of Competition", <a href="#vol_ii_page_160">160</a><br /> +"The Industrial Republic", <a href="#vol_ii_page_202">202</a><br /> +"The Jungle", <a href="#vol_ii_page_139">139</a><br /> +"The Lady", <a href="#vol_ii_page_012">12</a><br /> +"The Long Day", <a href="#vol_ii_page_026">26</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_029">29</a><br /> +"The Nature of Man", <a href="#vol_ii_page_033">33</a><br /> +"The Profits of Religion", <a href="#vol_ii_page_137">137</a><br /> +"The Social Revolution", <a href="#vol_ii_page_210">210</a><br /> +"The Strangle Hold", <a href="#vol_ii_page_200">200</a><br /> +Thompson, A. M., <a href="#vol_ii_page_031">31</a><br /> +Tolstoi, <a href="#vol_ii_page_053">53</a><br /> +"Totem and Taboo", <a href="#vol_ii_page_104">104</a><br /> +"Triangle", <a href="#vol_ii_page_056">56</a> +<br /><br /> +<a name="vol_ii_U" id="vol_ii_U"></a>Unconscious, <a href="#vol_ii_page_105">105</a><br /> +Unemployment, <a href="#vol_ii_page_147">147</a><br /> +<br /> +"<a name="vol_ii_V" id="vol_ii_V"></a>Vamps", <a href="#vol_ii_page_019">19</a><br /> +Vanity, <a href="#vol_ii_page_219">219</a><br /> +Varietism, <a href="#vol_ii_page_085">85</a><br /> +Venereal disease, <a href="#vol_ii_page_030">30</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_067">67</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_083">83</a><br /> +Voltaire, <a href="#vol_ii_page_036">36</a><br /> +Voluntary Parenthood League, <a href="#vol_ii_page_064">64</a> +<br /> +<a name="vol_ii_W" id="vol_ii_W"></a>War, <a href="#vol_ii_page_162">162</a><br /> +Wars, <a href="#vol_ii_page_155">155</a><br /> +Waste, <a href="#vol_ii_page_165">165</a><br /> +Wells, H. G., <a href="#vol_ii_page_089">89</a><br /> +Wharton, Edith, <a href="#vol_ii_page_095">95</a><br /> +"Wild oats", <a href="#vol_ii_page_006">6</a><br /> +White man's burden, <a href="#vol_ii_page_117">117</a><br /> +White, William Allen, <a href="#vol_ii_page_017">17</a><br /> +Worker, <a href="#vol_ii_page_140">140</a><br /> +Workers, <a href="#vol_ii_page_176">176</a><br /> +Working class, <a href="#vol_ii_page_140">140</a><br /> +Woman, <a href="#vol_ii_page_012">12</a><br /> +<br /> +"<a name="vol_ii_Y" id="vol_ii_Y"></a>Young love", <a href="#vol_ii_page_056">56</a>, <a href="#vol_ii_page_073">73</a><br /> +</p> + +<p><a name="vol_ii_page_225" id="vol_ii_page_225"></a></p> + +<hr /> + +<p class="cb">BOOKS BY UPTON SINCLAIR</p> + +<p>Published by the Author, Pasadena, California</p> + +<p>Trade Distributors: The Paine Book Co., Chicago, [I].</p> + +<p class="cb"><big><big>The Brass Check</big></big></p> + +<p class="cb">A Study of American Journalism</p> + +<p>Who owns the press and why?</p> + +<p>When you read your daily paper, are you reading facts or propaganda? And +whose propaganda?</p> + +<p>Who furnishes the raw material for your thoughts about life? Is it +honest material?</p> + +<p>No man can ask more important questions than these; and here for the +first time the questions are answered in a book.</p> + +<p>The first edition of this book, 23,000 copies, was sold out two weeks +after publication. Paper could not be obtained for printing, and a +carload of brown wrapping paper was used. The printings to date amount +to 144,000 copies. The book is being published in Great Britain and +colonies, and in translations in Germany, France, Holland, Norway, +Sweden, Denmark, Italy, Hungary and Japan.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p><span class="smcap">Hermann Bessemer</span>, <i>in the "Neues Journal," Vienna</i>:</p> + +<p>"Upton Sinclair deals with names, only with names, with balances, +with figures, with documents, a truly stunning, gigantic +fact-material. His book is an armored military train which with +rushing pistons roars through the jungle of American monsterlies, +whistling, roaring, shooting, chopping off with Berserker rage the +obscene heads of these evils. A breath-taking, clutching, frightful +book is 'The Brass Check.'"</p></div> + +<p>(<b>Prices of all books, unless otherwise stated, cloth $1.20, 3 copies $3, +10 copies $9; paper 60c, 3 copies $1.50, 10 copies $4.50. All prices +postpaid.</b>)<a name="vol_ii_page_226" id="vol_ii_page_226"></a></p> + +<p class="nind"><b><big>THE BOOK OF LIFE</big></b></p> + +<p>A book of practical counsel. Volume One—Mind and Body. Discusses truth +and its standards, and the basis of health, both mental and physical. +Tells people how to live, in order to avoid waste and pain, and to find +happiness and achieve progress.</p> + +<p>Volume Two—Love and Society. Discusses health in sex; love and +marriage, chastity, monogamy, birth control, divorce. Explains modern +economic problems, Socialism, revolution, industrial democracy, and the +future society. Prices of volumes one and two bound in one, cloth $1.50, +paper $1.00. Either of the two volumes separately, cloth $1.20, paper +60c.</p> + +<p class="nind"><b><big>THE JUNGLE</big></b></p> + +<p>This novel, first published in 1906, caused an international sensation. +It was the best selling book in the United States for a year; also in +Great Britain and its colonies. It was translated into seventeen +languages, and caused an investigation by President Roosevelt, and +action by Congress. The book has been out of print for ten years, and is +now reprinted by the author at a lower price than when first published, +although the cost of manufacture has since more than doubled.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"Not since Byron awoke one morning to find himself famous has there +been such an example of world-wide celebrity won in a day by a book +as has come to Upton Sinclair."—<i>New York Evening World.</i></p> + +<p>"It is a book that does for modern industrial slavery what 'Uncle +Tom's Cabin' did for black slavery. But the work is done far better +and more accurately in 'The Jungle' than in 'Uncle Tom's +Cabin.'"—<span class="smcap">Arthur Brisbane</span>, <i>in the New York Evening Journal</i>.</p></div> + +<p class="nind"><b><big>KING COAL</big></b></p> + +<p>A novel of the Colorado coal country.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"Clear, convincing, complete."—<span class="smcap">Lincoln Steffens.</span></p> + +<p>"I wish that every word of it could be burned deep into the heart +of every American."—<span class="smcap">Adolph Germer.</span></p></div> + +<div class="blockquot"><p><span class="smcap">Debs and the Poets</span>: Edited by Ruth Le Prade, with an introduction +by Upton Sinclair. A collection of poetry about Debs.</p></div> + +<p><span class="smcap">Sylvia</span>: A novel of the South.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Sylvia's Marriage</span>: A sequel. (Both in cloth only.)</p> + +<p class="nind"><b><big>100% A STORY OF A PATRIOT</big></b></p> + +<p>Would you like to go behind the scenes and see the "invisible +government" of your country saving you from the Bolsheviks and the Reds? +Would you like to meet the secret agents and provocateurs of "Big +Business," to know what they look like, how they talk and what they are +doing to make the world safe for democracy? Several of these gentlemen +have been haunting the home of Upton Sinclair during the past three +years and he has had the idea of turning the tables and investigating +the investigators. He has put one of them, Peter Gudge by name, into a +book, together with Peter's ladyloves, and his wife, and his boss, and a +whole group of his fellow-agents and their employers.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p><i>From</i> <span class="smcap">Louis Untermeyer,</span> <i>Author of "Challenge," etc.</i>:</p> + +<p>"Upton Sinclair has done it again. He has loaded his Maxim (no +Silencer attached), taken careful aim, and—bang!—hit the bell +plump in the center.</p> + +<p>"First of all, '100%' is a story; a story full of suspense, drama, +'heart interest,' plots, counterplots, high life, low life, humor, +hate and other passions—as thrilling as a W. S. Hart movie, as +interest-crammed as (and a darned sight more truthful than) your +daily newspaper."</p></div> + +<p class="nind"><b><big>THEY CALL ME CARPENTER: A TALE OF THE SECOND COMING</big></b></p> + +<p>Narrates how Jesus came to Los Angeles in the year 1921, and what +happened to Him. To be published in September, 1922.</p> + +<p class="nind"><b><big>THE CRY FOR JUSTICE</big></b></p> + +<p>An anthology of the literature of social protest, with an introduction +by Jack London, who calls it "this humanist Holy-book." Thirty-two +illustrations, 891 pages. Cloth, $1.50; paper, $1.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"It should rank with the very noblest works of all time. You could +scarcely have improved on its contents—it is remarkable in variety +and scope. Buoyant, but never blatant, powerful and passionate, it +has the spirit of a challenge and a battle cry."—<span class="smcap">Louis Untermeyer.</span></p> + +<p>"You have marvelously covered the whole ground. The result is a +book that radicals of every shade have long been waiting for. You +have made one that every student of the world's thought—economic, +philosophic, artistic—has to have."—<span class="smcap">Reginald Wright Kauffman.</span></p></div> + +<p class="nind"><b><big>THE PROFITS OF RELIGION</big></b></p> + +<p>A study of supernaturalism as a source of income and a shield to +privilege. The first investigation of this subject ever made in any +language.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"You have put a lot of work into it and you have marshalled your +facts in, masterly fashion."—<span class="smcap">William Marion Reedy.</span></p></div> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary=""> +<tr><td align="center">The following typographical errors have been corrected by the text +transcriber:</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">worshiping=>worshipping</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">changes takes place=>changes take place</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">is an impuse=>is an impulse</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">center of continous=>center of continuous</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">a starvling beggar at the gates=>a starving beggar at the gates</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">of fool nations about sex=>of fool notions about sex</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">any personal right in contravened=>any personal right is contravened</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">industrial evoluton=>industrial evolution</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">to the poeple=>to the people</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">Social revoluton=>Social revolution</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">her hands and and feet=>her hands and her feet</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">Liebault=>Liébault</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">Sienkewicz's "Whirlpools"=>Sienkiewicz's "Whirlpools"</td></tr> +<tr><td align="center">Magna Charta, 134=>Magna Carta, 134</td></tr> +</table> + +<hr class="full" /> + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and +Body; Vol. II Love and Society, by Upton Sinclair + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BOOK OF LIFE *** + +***** This file should be named 38117-h.htm or 38117-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/8/1/1/38117/ + +Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images available at The Internet Archive) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/38117-h/images/cover.jpg b/38117-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5beba5c --- /dev/null +++ b/38117-h/images/cover.jpg diff --git a/38117-h/images/cover_lg.jpg b/38117-h/images/cover_lg.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6a4d027 --- /dev/null +++ b/38117-h/images/cover_lg.jpg diff --git a/38117.txt b/38117.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a27adc --- /dev/null +++ b/38117.txt @@ -0,0 +1,17311 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and Body; +Vol. II Love and Society, by Upton Sinclair + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and Body; Vol. II Love and Society + +Author: Upton Sinclair + +Release Date: November 23, 2011 [EBook #38117] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BOOK OF LIFE *** + + + + +Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images available at The Internet Archive) + + + + + + + + + +The +Book _of_ Life + +UPTON SINCLAIR + + + + +THE BOOK OF LIFE + + + + +_The_ +Book of Life + +_By_ UPTON SINCLAIR + +VOLUME ONE: +MIND AND BODY + +VOLUME TWO: +LOVE AND SOCIETY + +UPTON SINCLAIR +PASADENA, CALIFORNIA + +WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS +_THE PAINE BOOK COMPANY_ +CHICAGO + +COPYRIGHT, 1921, 1922 +BY +UPTON SINCLAIR +_All Rights Reserved._ + + + _To_ + Kate Crane Gartz +in acknowledgment of her unceasing efforts for a +better world, and her fidelity to those + who struggle to achieve it. + + + + +INTRODUCTORY + + +The writer of this book has been in this world some forty-two years. +That may not seem long to some, but it is long enough to have made many +painful mistakes, and to have learned much from them. Looking about him, +he sees others making these same mistakes, suffering for lack of that +same knowledge which he has so painfully acquired. This being the case, +it seems a friendly act to offer his knowledge, minus the blunders and +the pain. + +There come to the writer literally thousands of letters every year, +asking him questions, some of them of the strangest. A man is dying of +cancer, and do I think it can be cured by a fast? A man is unable to +make his wife happy, and can I tell him what is the matter with women? A +man has invested his savings in mining stock, and can I tell him what to +do about it? A man works in a sweatshop, and has only a little time for +self-improvement, and will I tell him what books he ought to read? Many +such questions every day make one aware of a vast mass of people, +earnest, hungry for happiness, and groping as if in a fog. The things +they most need to know they are not taught in the schools, nor in the +newspapers they read, nor in the church they attend. Of these agencies, +the first is not entirely competent, the second is not entirely honest, +and the third is not entirely up to date. Nor is there anywhere a book +in which the effort has been made to give to everyday human beings the +everyday information they need for the successful living of their lives. + +For the present book the following claims may be made. First, it is a +modern book; its writer watches hour by hour the new achievements of the +human mind, he reaches out for information about them, he seeks to +adjust his own thoughts to them and to test them in his own living. +Second, it is, or tries hard to be, a wise book; its writer is not among +those too-ardent young radicals who leap to the conclusion that because +many old things are stupid and tiresome, therefore everything that is +old is to be spurned with contempt, and everything that proclaims itself +new is to be taken at its own valuation. Third, it is an honest book; +its writer will not pretend to know what he only guesses, and where it +is necessary to guess, he will say so frankly. Finally, it is a kind +book; it is not written for its author's glory, nor for his enrichment, +but to tell you things that may be useful to you in the brief span of +your life. It will attempt to tell you how to live, how to find health +and happiness and success, how to work and how to play, how to eat and +how to sleep, how to love and to marry and to care for your children, +how to deal with your fellow men in business and politics and social +life, how to act and how to think, what religion to believe, what art to +enjoy, what books to read. A large order, as the boys phrase it! + +There are several ways for such a book to begin. It might begin with the +child, because we all begin that way; it might begin with love, because +that precedes the child; it might begin with the care of the body, +explaining that sound physical health is the basis of all right living, +and even of right thinking; it might begin as most philosophies do, by +defining life, discussing its origin and fundamental nature. + +The trouble with this last plan is that there are a lot of people who +have their ideas on life made up in tabloid form; they have creeds and +catechisms which they know by heart, and if you suggest to them anything +different, they give you a startled look and get out of your way. And +then there is another, and in our modern world a still larger class, who +say, "Oh, shucks! I don't go in for religion and that kind of thing." +You offer them something that looks like a sermon, and they turn to the +baseball page. + +Who will read this Book of Life? There will be, among others, the great +American tired business man. He wrestles with problems and cares all +day, and when he sits down to read in the evening, he says: "Make it +short and snappy." There is the wife of the tired business man, the +American perfect lady. She does most of the reading for the family; but +she has never got down to anything fundamental in her life, and mostly +she likes to read about exciting love affairs, which she distinguishes +from the unexciting kind she knows by the word "romance." Then there is +the still more tired American workingman, who has been "speeded up" all +day under the bonus system or the piece-work system, and is apt to fall +asleep in his chair before he finishes supper. Then there is the +workingman's wife, who has slaved all day in the kitchen, and has a +chance for a few minutes' intimacy with her husband before he falls +asleep. She would like to have somebody tell her what to do for croup, +but she is not sure that she has time to discuss the question whether +life is worth living. + +Yet, I wonder; is there a single one among all these tired people, or +even among the cynical people, who has not had some moment of awe when +the thought came stabbing into his mind like a knife: "What a strange +thing this life is! What am I anyhow? Where do I come from, and what is +going to become of me? What do I mean, what am I here for?" I have sat +chatting with three hoboes by a railroad track, cooking themselves a +mulligan in an old can, and heard one of them say: "By God, it's a queer +thing, ain't it, mate?" I have sat on the deck of a ship, looking out +over the midnight ocean and talking with a sailor, and heard him use +almost the identical words. It is not only in the class-room and the +schools that the minds of men are grappling with the fundamental +problems; in fact, it was not from the schools that the new religions +and the great moral impulses of humanity took their origin. It was from +lonely shepherds sitting on the hillsides, and from fishermen casting +their nets, and from carpenters and tailors and shoemakers at their +benches. + +Stop and think a bit, and you will realize it does make a difference +what you believe about life, how it comes to be, where it is going, and +what is your place in it. Is there a heaven with a God, who watches you +day and night, and knows every thought you think, and will some day take +you to eternal bliss if you obey his laws? If you really believe that, +you will try to find out about his laws, and you will be comparatively +little concerned about the success or failure of your business. Perhaps, +on the other hand, you have knocked about in the world and lost your +"faith"; you have been cheated and exploited, and have set out to "get +yours," as the phrase is; to "feather your own nest." But some gust of +passion seizes you, and you waste your substance, you wreck your life; +then you wonder, "Who set that trap and baited it? Am I a creature of +blind instincts, jealousies and greeds and hates beyond my own control +entirely? Am I a poor, feeble insect, blown about in a storm and +smashed? Or do I make the storm, and can I in any part control it?" + +No matter how busy you may be, no matter how tired you may be, it will +pay you to get such things straight: to know a little of what the wise +men of the past have thought about them, and more especially what +science with its new tools of knowledge may have discovered. + +The writer of this book spent nine years of his life in colleges and +universities; also he was brought up in a church. So he knows the +orthodox teachings, he can say that he has given to the recognized wise +men of the world every opportunity to tell him what they know. Then, +being dissatisfied, he went to the unrecognized teachers, the +enthusiasts and the "cranks" of a hundred schools. Finally, he thought +for himself; he was even willing to try experiments upon himself. As a +result, he has not found what he claims is ultimate or final truth; but +he has what he might describe as a rough working draft, a practical +outline, good for everyday purposes. He is going to have confidence +enough in you, the reader, to give you the hardest part first; that is, +to begin with the great fundamental questions. What is life, and how +does it come to be? What does it mean, and what have we to do with it? +Are we its masters or its slaves? What does it owe us, and what do we +owe to it? Why is it so hard, and do we have to stand its hardness? And +can we really know about all these matters, or will we be only guessing? +Can we trust ourselves to think about them, or shall we be safer if we +believe what we are told? Shall we be punished if we think wrong, and +how shall we be punished? Shall we be rewarded if we think right, and +will the pay be worth the trouble? + +Such questions as these I am going to try to answer in the simplest +language possible. I would avoid long words altogether, if I could; but +some of these long words mean certain definite things, and there are no +other words to serve the purpose. You do not refuse to engage in the +automobile business because the carburetor and the differential are +words of four syllables. Neither should you refuse to get yourself +straight with the universe because it is too much trouble to go to the +dictionary and learn that the word "phenomenon" means something else +than a little boy who can play the piano or do long division in his +head. + + + + +CONTENTS + + +PART ONE: THE BOOK OF THE MIND + + PAGE + +CHAPTER I. THE NATURE OF LIFE 3 + +Attempts to show what we know about life; to set the +bounds of real truth as distinguished from phrases and +self-deception. + +CHAPTER II. THE NATURE OF FAITH 8 + +Attempts to show what we can prove by our reason, and +what we know intuitively; what is implied in the process +of thinking, and without which no thought could be. + +CHAPTER III. THE USE OF REASON 12 + +Attempts to show that in the field to which reason applies +we are compelled to use it, and are justified in trusting it. + +CHAPTER IV. THE ORIGIN OF MORALITY 17 + +Compares the ways of Nature with human morality, and +tries to show how the latter came to be. + +CHAPTER V. NATURE AND MAN 21 + +Attempts to show how man has taken control of Nature, +and is carrying on her processes and improving upon them. + +CHAPTER VI. MAN THE REBEL 27 + +Shows the transition stage between instinct and reason, +in which man finds himself, and how he can advance to +a securer condition. + +CHAPTER VII. MAKING OUR MORALS 31 + +Attempts to show that human morality must change to fit +human facts, and there can be no judge of it save human +reason. + +CHAPTER VIII. THE VIRTUE OF MODERATION 37 + +Attempts to show that wise conduct is an adjustment of +means to ends, and depends upon the understanding of a +particular set of circumstances. + +CHAPTER IX. THE CHOOSING OF LIFE 42 + +Discusses the standards by which we may judge what is +best in life, and decide what we wish to make of it. + +CHAPTER X. MYSELF AND MY NEIGHBOR 50 + +Compares the new morality with the old, and discusses the +relative importance of our various duties. + +CHAPTER XI. THE MIND AND THE BODY 53 + +Discusses the interaction between physical and mental +things, and the possibility of freedom in a world of fixed +causes. + +CHAPTER XII. THE MIND OF THE BODY 61 + +Discusses the subconscious mind, what it is, what it does +to the body, and how it can be controlled and made use +of by the intelligence. + +CHAPTER XIII. EXPLORING THE SUBCONSCIOUS 67 + +Discusses automatic writing, the analysis of dreams, and +other methods by which a new universe of life has been +brought to human knowledge. + +CHAPTER XIV. THE PROBLEM OF IMMORTALITY 74 + +Discusses the survival of personality from the moral point +of view: that is, have we any claim upon life, entitling +us to live forever? + +CHAPTER XV. THE EVIDENCE FOR SURVIVAL 81 + +Discusses the data of psychic research, and the proofs of +spiritism thus put before us. + +CHAPTER XVI. THE POWERS OF THE MIND 91 + +Sets forth the fact that knowledge is freedom and ignorance +is slavery, and what science means to the people. + +CHAPTER XVII. THE CONDUCT OF THE MIND 98 + +Concludes the Book of the Mind with a study of how to +preserve and develop its powers for the protection of our +lives and the lives of all men. + + +PART TWO: THE BOOK OF THE BODY + +CHAPTER XVIII. THE UNITY OF THE BODY 105 + +Discusses the body as a whole, and shows that health is +not a matter of many different organs and functions, but +is one problem of one organism. + +CHAPTER XIX. EXPERIMENTS IN DIET 115 + +Narrates the author's adventures in search of health, and +his conclusions as to what to eat. + +CHAPTER XX. ERRORS IN DIET 123 + +Discusses the different kinds of foods, and the part they +play in the making of health and disease. + +CHAPTER XXI. DIET STANDARDS 134 + +Discusses various foods and their food values, the quantities +we need, and their money cost. + +CHAPTER XXII. FOODS AND POISONS 145 + +Concludes the subject of diet, and discusses the effect upon +the system of stimulants and narcotics. + +CHAPTER XXIII. MORE ABOUT HEALTH 156 + +Discusses the subjects of breathing and ventilation, clothing, +bathing and sleep. + +CHAPTER XXIV. WORK AND PLAY 163 + +Deals with the question of exercise, both for the idle and +the overworked. + +CHAPTER XXV. THE FASTING CURE 169 + +Deals with Nature's own remedy for disease, and how to +make use of it. + +CHAPTER XXVI. BREAKING THE FAST 177 + +Discusses various methods of building up the body after +a fast, especially the milk diet. + +CHAPTER XXVII. DISEASES AND CURES 182 + +Discusses some of the commoner human ailments, and +what is known about their cause and cure. + + + + +PART ONE + +THE BOOK OF THE MIND + + + + +CHAPTER I + +THE NATURE OF LIFE + + (Attempts to show what we know about life; to set the bounds of + real truth as distinguished from phrases and self-deception.) + + +If I could, I would begin this book by telling you what Life is. But +unfortunately I do not know what Life is. The only consolation I can +find is in the fact that nobody else knows either. + +We ask the churches, and they tell us that male and female created He +them, and put them in the Garden of Eden, and they would have been happy +had not Satan tempted them. But then you ask, who made Satan, and the +explanation grows vague. You ask, if God made Satan, and knew what Satan +was going to do, is it not the same as if God did it himself? So this +explanation of the origin of evil gets you no further than the Hindoo +picture of the world resting on the back of a tortoise, and the tortoise +on the head of a snake--and nothing said as to what the snake rests on. + +Let us go to the scientist. I know a certain physiologist, perhaps the +greatest in the world, and his eager face rises before me, and I hear +his quick, impetuous voice declaring that he knows what Life is; he has +told it in several big volumes, and all I have to do is to read them. +Life is a tropism, caused by the presence of certain combinations of +chemicals; my friend knows this, because he has produced the thing in +his test-tubes. He is an exponent of a way of thought called Monism, +which finds the ultimate source of being in forms of energy manifesting +themselves as matter; he shows how all living things arise from that and +sink back into it. + +But question this scientist more closely. What is this "matter" that you +are so sure of? How do you know it? Obviously, through sensations. You +never know matter itself, you only know its effects upon you, and you +assume that the matter must be there to cause the sensation. In other +words, "matter," which seems so real, turns out to be merely "a +permanent possibility of sensation." And suppose there were to be +sensations, caused, for example, by a sportive demon who liked to make +fun of eminent physiologists--then there might be the appearance of +matter and nothing else; in other words, there might be mind, and +various states of mind. So we discover that the materialist, in the +philosophic sense, is making just as large an act of faith, is +pronouncing just as bold a dogma as any priest of any religion. + +This is an old-time topic of disputation. Before Mother Eddy there was +Bishop Berkeley, and before Berkeley, there was Plato, and they and the +materialists disputed until their hearers cried in despair, "What is +Mind? No matter! What is Matter? Never mind!" But a century or two ago +in a town of Prussia there lived a little, dried-up professor of +philosophy, who sat himself down in his room and fixed his eyes on a +church steeple outside the window, and for years on end devoted himself +to examining the tools of thought with which the human mind is provided, +and deciding just what work and how much of it they are fitted to do. So +came the proof that our minds are incapable of reaching to or dealing +with any ultimate reality whatever, but can comprehend only +phenomena--that is to say, appearances--and their relations one with +another. The Koenigsberg professor proved this once for all time, +setting forth four propositions about ultimate reality, and proving them +by exact and irrefutable logic, and then proving by equally exact and +irrefutable logic their precise opposites and contraries. Anybody who +has read and comprehended the four "antinomies" of Immanuel Kant[A] +knows that metaphysics is as dead a subject as astrology, and that all +the complicated theories which the philosophers from Heraclitus to +Arthur Balfour have spun like spiders out of their inner consciousness, +have no more relation to reality than the intricacies of the game of +chess. + + [A] See Paulsen: "Life of Kant." + +The writer is sorry to make this statement, because he spent a lot of +time reading these philosophers and acquainting himself with their +subtle theories. He learned a whole language of long words, and even the +special meanings which each philosopher or school of philosophers give +to them. When he had got through, he had learned, so far as metaphysics +is concerned, absolutely nothing, and had merely the job of clearing out +of his mind great masses of verbal cobwebs. It was not even good +intellectual training; the metaphysical method of thought is a _trap_. +The person who thinks in absolutes and ultimates is led to believe that +he has come to conclusions about reality, when as a matter of fact he +has merely proved what he wants to believe; if he had wanted to believe +the opposite, he could have proven that exactly as well--as his +opponents will at once demonstrate. + +If you multiply two feet by two feet, the result represents a plain +surface, or figure of two dimensions. If you multiply two feet by two +feet by two feet, you have a solid, or figure of three dimensions--such +as the world in which we live and move. But now, suppose you multiply +two feet by two feet by two feet by two feet, what does that represent? +For ages the minds of mathematicians and philosophers have been tempted +by this fascinating problem of the "fourth dimension." They have worked +out by analogy what such a world would be like. If you went into this +"fourth dimension," you could turn yourself inside out, and come back to +our present world in that condition, and no one of your three-dimension +friends would be able to imagine how you had managed it, or to put you +back again the way you belonged. And in this, it seems to me, we have +the perfect analogy of metaphysical thinking. It is the "fourth +dimension" of the mind, and plays as much havoc with sound thinking as a +physical "fourth dimension" would play with--say, the prison system. A +man who takes up an absolute--God, immortality, the origin of being, a +first cause, free will, absolute right or wrong, infinite time or space, +final truth, original substance, the "thing in itself"--that man +disappears into a fourth dimension, and turns himself inside out or +upside down or hindside foremost, and comes back and exhibits himself in +triumph; then, when he is ready, he effects another disappearance, and +another change, and is back on earth an ordinary human being. + +The world is full of schools of thought, theologians and metaphysicians +and professors of academic philosophy, transcendentalists and +theosophists and Christian Scientists, who perform such mental +monkey-shines continuously before our eyes. They prove what they please, +and the fact that no two of them prove the same thing makes clear to us +in the end that none of them has proved anything. The Christian +Scientist asserts that there is no such thing as matter, but that pain +is merely a delusion of mortal mind; he continues serene in this faith +until he runs into an automobile and sustains a compound fracture of +the femur--whereupon he does exactly what any of the rest of us do, goes +to a competent surgeon and has the bone set. On the other hand, some +devoted young Socialists of my acquaintance have read Haeckel and +Dietzgen, and adopted the dogma that matter is the first cause, and that +all things have grown out of it and return to it; they have seen that +the brain decays after death, they declare that the soul is a function +of the brain--and because of such theories they deliberately reject the +most powerful modes of appeal whereby men can be swayed to faith in +human solidarity. + +The best books I know for the sweeping out of metaphysical cobwebs are +"The Philosophy of Common Sense" and "The Creed of a Layman," by +Frederic Harrison, leader of the English Positivists, a school of +thought established by Auguste Comte. But even as I recommend these +books, I recall the dissatisfaction with which I left them; for it +appears that the Positivists have their dogmas like all the rest. Mr. +Harrison is not content to say that mankind has not the mental tools for +dealing with ultimate realities; he must needs prove that mankind never +will and never can have these tools, I look back upon the long process +of evolution and ask myself, What would an oyster think about +Positivism? What would be the opinion of, let us say, a young turnip on +the subject of Mr. Frederic Harrison's thesis? It may well be that the +difference between a turnip and Mr. Harrison is not so great as will be +the difference between Mr. Harrison and that super-race which some day +takes possession of the earth and of all the universe. It does not seem +to me good science or good sense to dogmatize about what this race will +know, or what will be its tools of thought. What does seem to me good +science and good sense is to take the tools which we now possess and use +them to their utmost capacity. + +What is it that we know about life? We know a seemingly endless stream +of sensations which manifest themselves in certain ways, and seem to +inhere in what we call things and beings. We observe incessant change in +all these phenomena, and we examine these changes and discover their +ways. The ways seem to be invariable; so completely so that for +practical purposes we assume them to be invariable, and base all our +calculations and actions upon this assumption. Manifestly, we could not +live otherwise, and the spread of scientific knowledge is the further +tracing out of such "laws"--that is to say, the ways of behaving of +existence--and the extending of our belief in their invariability to +wider and wider fields. + +Once upon a time we were told that "the wind bloweth where it listeth." +But now we are quite certain that there are causes for the blowing of +the wind, and when our researches have been carried far enough, we shall +be able to account for and to predict every smallest breath of air. Once +we were told that dreams came from a supernatural world; but now we are +beginning to analyze dreams, and to explain what they come from and what +they mean. Perhaps we still find human nature a bewildering and +unaccountable thing; but some day we shall know enough of man's body and +his mind, his past and his present, to be able to explain human nature +and to produce it at will, precisely as today we produce certain +reactions in our test-tubes, and do it so invariably that the most +cautious financier will invest tens of millions of dollars in a process, +and never once reflect that he is putting too much trust in the +permanence of nature. + +In many departments of thought great specialists are now working, +experimenting and observing by the methods of science. If in the course +of this book we speak of "certainty," we mean, of course, not the +"absolute" certainty of any metaphysical dogma, but the practical +certainty of everyday common sense; the certainty we feel that eating +food will satisfy our hunger, and that tomorrow, as today, two and two +will continue to make four. + + + + +CHAPTER II + +THE NATURE OF FAITH + + (Attempts to show what we can prove by our reason, and what we know + intuitively; what is implied in the process of thinking, and + without which no thought could be.) + + +The primary fact that we know about life is growth. Herbert Spencer has +defined this growth, or evolution, in a string of long words which may +be summed up to mean: the process whereby a number of things which are +simple and like one another become different parts of one thing which is +complex. If we observe this process in ourselves, and the symptoms of it +in others, we discover that when it is proceeding successfully, it is +accompanied by a sensation of satisfaction which we call happiness or +pleasure; also that when it is thwarted or repressed, it is accompanied +by a different sensation which we call pain. Subtle metaphysicians, both +inside the churches and out, have set themselves to the task of proving +that there must be some other object of life than the continuance of +these sensations of pleasure which accompany successful growth. They +have proven to their own satisfaction that morality will collapse and +human progress come to an end unless we can find some other motive, +something more permanent and more stimulating, something "higher," as +they phrase it. All I can say is that I gave reverent attention to the +arguments of these moralists and theologians, and that for many years I +believed their doctrines; but I believe them no longer. + +I interpret the purpose of life to be the continuous unfoldment of its +powers, its growth into higher forms--that is to say, forms more complex +and subtly contrived, capable of more intense and enduring kinds of that +satisfaction which is nature's warrant of life. If you wish to take up +this statement and argue about it, please wait until you have read the +chapter "Nature and Man," and noted my distinction between instinctive +life and rational life. For men, the word "growth" does not mean _any_ +growth, _all_ growth, blind and indiscriminate growth. It does not mean +growth for the tubercle bacillus, nor growth for the anopheles mosquito, +nor growth for the house-fly, the spider and the louse. Neither do we +mean that the purpose of man's own life is _any_ pleasure, _all_ +pleasure, blind and indiscriminate pleasure; the pleasure of alcohol, +the pleasure of cannibalism, the pleasure of the modern form of +cannibalism which we call "making money." We have survived in the +struggle for existence by the cooperative and social use of our powers +of judgment; and our judgment is that which selects among forms of +growth, which gives preference to wheat and corn over weeds, and to +self-control and honesty over treachery and greed. + +So when we say that the purpose of life is happiness, we do not mean to +turn mankind loose at a hog-trough; we mean that our duty as thinkers is +to watch life, to test it, to pick and choose among the many forms it +offers, and to say: This kind of growth is more permanent and full of +promise, it is more fertile, more deeply satisfactory; therefore, we +choose this, and sanction the kind of pleasure which it brings. Other +kinds we decide are temporary and delusive; therefore we put in jail +anyone who sells alcoholic drink, and we refuse to invite to our home +people who are lewd, and some day we shall not permit our children to +attend moving picture shows in which the modern form of cannibalism is +glorified. + +The reader, no doubt, has been taught a distinction between "science" +and "faith." He is saying now, "You believe that everything is to be +determined by human reason? You reject all faith?" I answer, No; I am +not rejecting faith; I am merely refusing to apply it to objects with +which it has nothing to do. You do not take it as a matter of faith that +a package of sugar weighs a pound; you put it on the scales and find +out--in other words, you make it a matter of experiment. But all the +creeds of all the religious sects are full of pronouncements which are +no more matters of faith than the question of the weighing of sugar. Is +pork a wholesome article of food or is it not? All Christians will +readily acknowledge that this is a matter to be determined by the +microscope and other devices of experimental science; but then some Jew +rises in the meeting and puts the question: Is dancing injurious to the +character? And immediately all members of the Methodist Episcopal Church +vote to close the discussion. + +What is faith? Faith is the instinct which underlies all being, assuring +us that life is worth while and honest, a thing to be trusted; in other +words, it is the certainty that successful growth always is and always +will be accompanied by pleasure. The most skeptical scientist in the +world, even my friend the physiologist who proves that life is nothing +but a tropism, and can be produced by mixing chemicals in +test-tubes--this eager friend is one of the most faithful men I know. He +is burning up with the faith that knowledge is worth possessing, and +also that it is possible of attainment. With what boundless scorn would +he receive any suggestion to the contrary--for example, the idea that +life might be a series of sensations which some sportive demon is +producing for the torment of man! More than that, this friend is burning +up with the certainty that knowledge can be spread, that his fellow men +will receive it and apply it, and that it will make them happy when they +do. Why else does he write his learned books in defense of the +materialist philosophy? + +And that same faith which animates the great monist animates likewise +every child who toddles off to school, and every chicken which emerges +from an egg, and every blade of grass which thrusts its head above the +ground. Not every chicken survives, of course, and all the blades of +grass wither in the fall; nevertheless, the seeds of grass are spread, +and chickens make food for philosophers, and the great process of life +continues to manifest its faith. In the end the life process produces +man, who, as we shall presently see, takes it up, and judges it, and +makes it over to suit himself. + +You will note from this that I am what is called an optimist; whereas +some of the great philosophers of the world have called themselves +pessimists. But I notice with a smile that these are often the men who +work hardest of all to spread their ideas, and thus testify to the +worthwhileness of truth and the perfectibility of mankind. There has +come to be a saying among settlement workers and physicians, who are +familiar with poverty and its effects upon life, that there are no bad +babies and good babies, there are only sick babies and well babies. In +the same way, I would say there are no pessimists and optimists, there +are only mentally sick people and mentally well people. Everywhere +throughout life, both animal and vegetable, health means happiness, and +gives abundant evidence of that fact. All healthy life is satisfactory +to itself; when it develops reason, it tries to find out why, and this +is yet another testimony to the fact that having power and using it is +pleasant. When I was in college the professor would propound the old +question: "Would you rather be a happy pig or an unhappy philosopher?" +My answer always was: "I would rather be a happy philosopher." The +professor replied: "Perhaps that is not possible." But I said: "I will +prove that it is!" + + + + +CHAPTER III + +THE USE OF REASON + + (Attempts to show that in the field to which reason applies we are + compelled to use it, and are justified in trusting it.) + + +The great majority of people are brought up to believe that some +particular set of dogmas are objects of faith, and that there are +penalties more or less severe for the application of reason to these +dogmas. What particular set it happens to be is a matter of geography; +in a crowded modern city like New York, it is a matter of the particular +block on which the child is born. A child born on Hester Street will be +taught that his welfare depends upon his never eating meat and butter +from the same dish. A child born on Tenth Avenue will be taught that it +is a matter of his not eating meat on Fridays. A child born on Madison +Avenue will be taught that it is a question of the precise metaphysical +process by which bread is changed into human body and wine into human +blood. Each of these children will be assured that his human reason is +fallible, that it is extremely dangerous to apply it to this "sacred" +subject, and that the proper thing to do is to accept the authority of +some ancient tradition, or some institution, or some official, or some +book for which a special sanction is claimed. + +Has there ever been in the world any revelation, outside of or above +human reason? Could there ever be such a thing? In order to test this +possibility, select for yourself the most convincing way by which a +special revelation could be handed down to mankind. Take any of the +ancient orthodox ways, the finding of graven tablets on a mountain-top, +or a voice speaking from a burning bush, or an angel appearing before a +great concourse of people and handing out a written scroll. Suppose that +were to happen, let us say, at the next Yale-Harvard football game; +suppose the news were to be flashed to the ends of the earth that God +had thus presented to mankind an entirely new religion. What would be +the process by which the people of London or Calcutta would decide upon +that revelation? First, they would have to consider the question +whether it was an American newspaper fake--by no means an easy question. +Second, they would have to consider the chances of its being an optical +delusion. Then, assuming they accepted the sworn testimony of ten +thousand mature and competent witnesses, they would have to consider the +possibility of someone having invented a new kind of invisible +aeroplane. Assuming they were convinced that it was really a +supernatural being, they would next have to decide the chances of its +being a visitor from Mars, or from the fourth dimension of space, or +from the devil. In considering all this, they would necessarily have to +examine the alleged revelation. What was the literary quality of it? +What was the moral quality of it? What would be the effect upon mankind +if the alleged revelation were to be universally adopted and applied? + +Manifestly, all these are questions for the human reason, the human +judgment; there is no other method of determining them, there would be +nothing for any individual person, or for men as a whole to do, except +to apply their best powers, and, as the phrase is, "make up their minds" +about the matter. Reason would be the judge, and the new revelation +would be the prisoner at the bar. Humanity might say, this is a real +inspiration, we will submit ourselves to it and follow it, and allow no +one from now on to question it. But inevitably there would be some who +would say, "Tommyrot!" There would be others who would say, "This new +revelation isn't working, it is repressing progress, it is stifling the +mind." These people would stand up for their conviction, they would +become martyrs, and all the world would have to discuss them. And who +would decide between them and the great mass of men? Reason, the judge, +would decide. + +It is perfectly true that human reason is fallible. Infallibility is an +absolute, a concept of the mind, and not a reality. Life has not given +us infallibility, any more than it has given us omniscience, or +omnipotence, or any other of those attributes which we call divine. Life +has given us powers, more or less weak, more or less strong, but all +capable of improvement and development. Reason is the tool whereby +mankind has won supremacy over the rest of the animal kingdom, and is +gradually taking control of the forces of nature. It is the best tool we +have, and because it is the best, we are driven irresistibly to use it. +And how strange that some of us can find no better use for it than to +destroy its own self! Visit one of the Jesuit fathers and hear him seek +to persuade you that reason is powerless against faith and must abdicate +to faith. You answer, "Yes, father, you have persuaded me. I admit the +fallibility of my mortal powers; and I begin by applying my doubts of +them to the arguments by which you have just convinced me. I was +convinced, but of course I cannot be sure of a conviction, attained by +fallible reason. Therefore I am just where I was before--except that I +am no longer in position to be certain of anything." + +You answer in good faith, and take up your hat and depart, closing the +door of the good father's study behind you. But stop a moment, why do +you close the door? You close the door because your reason tells you +that otherwise the cold air outside will blow in and make the good +father uncomfortable. You put your hat on, because your reason has not +yet been applied to the problem of the cause of baldness. You step out +onto the street, and when you hear a sudden noise, you step back onto +the curbstone, because your reason tells you that an automobile is +coming, and that on the sidewalk you are safe from it. So you go on, +using your reason in a million acts of your life whereby your life is +preserved and developed. And if anybody suggested that the fallibility +of your reason should cause you to delay in front of an automobile, you +would apply your reason to the problem of that person and decide that he +was insane. And I say that just as there is insanity in everyday +judgments and relationships, so there is insanity in philosophy, +metaphysics and religion; the seed and source of all this kind of +insanity being the notion that it is the duty of anybody to believe +anything which cannot completely justify itself as reasonable. + +Nowadays, as ideas are spreading, the champions of dogma are hard put to +it, and you will find their minds a muddle of two points of view. The +Jewish rabbi will strive desperately to think of some hygienic objection +to the presence of meat and butter on the same plate; the Catholic +priest will tell you that fish is a very wholesome article of food, and +that anyhow we all eat too much; the Methodist and the Baptist and the +Presbyterian will tell you that if men did not rest one day in seven +their health would break down. Thus they justify faith by reason, and +reconcile the conflict between science and theology. Accepting this +method, I experiment and learn that it improves my digestion and adds to +my working power if I play tennis on Sunday. I follow this indisputably +rational form of conduct--and find myself in conflict with the "faith" +of the ancient State of Delaware, which obliges me to serve a term in +its state's prison for having innocently and unwittingly desecrated its +day of holiness! + +If you read Professor Bury's little book, "A History of Freedom of +Thought," you will discover that there has been a long conflict over the +right of men to use their minds--and the victory is not yet. The term +"free thinker," which ought to be the highest badge a man could wear, is +still almost everywhere throughout America a term of vague terror. In +the State of California today there is a Criminal Syndicalism Act, which +provides a maximum of fourteen years in jail for any person who shall +write or publish or speak any words expressive of the idea that the +United States government should be overthrown in the same way that it +was established--that is, by force; only a few months ago the writer of +this book was on the witness stand for two days, and had the painful, +almost incredible experience of being battered and knocked about by an +inquisitive district attorney, who cross-examined him as to every detail +of his beliefs, and read garbled extracts from his published writings, +in the effort to make it appear that he held some belief which might +possibly prejudice the jury against him. The defendant in this case, a +returned soldier who had spent three years as a volunteer in the +trenches, and had been twice wounded and once gassed, was accused, not +merely of approving the Soviet form of government, but also of having +printed uncomplimentary references to priests and religious +institutions. + +Nowadays it is the propertied class which has taken possession of the +powers of government, and which presumes to censor the thinking of +mankind in its own interest. But whether it be priestcraft or whether it +be capitalism which seeks to bind the human mind, it comes to the same +thing, and the effort must be met by the assertion that, in spite of +errors and blunders, and the serious harm these may do, there is no way +for men to advance save by using the best powers of thinking they +possess, and proclaiming their conclusions to others. Speaking +theologically for the moment, God has given us our reasoning powers, and +also the impulse to use them, and it is inconceivable that He should +seek to restrict their use, or should give to anyone the power to forbid +their use. It is His truth which we seek, and His which we proclaim. In +so doing we perform our highest act of faith, and we refuse to be +troubled by the idea that for this service He will reward us by an +eternity of sulphur and brimstone. + +Throughout the remainder of this book it will be assumed that the reader +accepts this point of view, or, at any rate, that he is willing for +purposes of experiment to give it a trial and see where it leads him. We +shall proceed to consider the problems of human life in the light of +reason, to determine how they come to be, and how they can be solved. + + + + +CHAPTER IV + +THE ORIGIN OF MORALITY + + (Compares the ways of nature with human morality, and tries to show + how the latter came to be.) + + +Seventy years ago Charles Darwin published his book, "The Origin of +Species," in which he defied the theological dogma of his time by the +shocking idea that life had evolved by many stages of progress from the +diatom to man. This of course did not conform to the story of the Garden +of Eden, and so "Darwinism" was fought as an invention of the devil, and +in the interior of America there are numerous sectarian colleges where +the dread term "evolution" is spoken in awed whispers. Only the other +day I read in my newspaper the triumphant proclamation of some clergyman +that "Darwinism" had been overthrown. This reverend gentleman had got +mixed up because some biologists were disputing some detail of the +method by which the evolution of species had been brought about. Do +species change by the gradual elimination of the unfit, or do they +change by sudden leaps, the "mutation" theory of de Vries? Are acquired +powers transmitted to posterity, or is the germ plasm unaffected by its +environment? Concerning such questions the scientists debate. But the +fact that life has evolved in an ordered series from the lower forms to +the higher, and that each individual reproduces in embryo and in infancy +the history of this long process--these facts are now the basis of all +modern thinking, and as generally accepted as the rotation of the earth. + +You may study this process of evolution from the outside, in the +multitude of forms which it has assumed and in their reactions one to +another; or you may study it from the inside in your own soul, the +emotions which accompany it, the impulse or craving which impels it, the +_elan vital_, as it is called by the French philosopher Bergson. The +Christians call it love, and Nietzsche, who hated Christianity, called +it "the will to power," and persuaded himself that it was the opposite +of love. + +You will find in the essays of Professor Huxley, one entitled +"Evolution and Ethics," in which he sets forth the complete unmorality +of nature, and declares that there is no way by which what mankind knows +as morality can have originated in the process of nature or can be +reconciled to natural law. This statement, coming from a leading +agnostic, was welcome to the theologians. But when I first read the +essay, as a student of sixteen, it seemed to me narrow; I thought I saw +a standpoint from which the contradiction disappeared. The difference +between the morality of Christ and the morality of nature is merely the +difference between a lower and a higher stage of mental development. The +animal loves and seeks by instinct to preserve the life which it +knows--that is to say, its own life and the life of its young. The wolf +knows nothing about the feelings of a deer; but man in his savage state +develops reasoning powers enough to realize that there are others like +himself, the members of his own tribe, and he makes for himself taboos +which forbid him to kill and eat the members of that tribe. At the +present time humanity has developed its reason and imaginative sympathy +to include in the "tribe" one or two hundred million people; while to +those outside the tribe it still preserves the attitude of the wolf. + +How came it that a mind so acute as Huxley's went so far astray on the +question of the evolution of morality? The answer is that this was the +factory age in England, and the great scientist, a rebel in theological +matters, was in economics a child of his time. We find him using the +formulas of bourgeois biology to ridicule Henry George and his plea for +the freeing of the land. "Competition is the life of trade," ran the +nineteenth century slogan; and competition was the god of nineteenth +century biology. Tennyson summed it up in the phrase: "Nature red in +tooth and claw with ravin;" and this was found convenient by Manchester +manufacturers who wished to shut little children up for fourteen hours a +day in cotton mills, and to harness women to drag cars in the coal +mines, and to be told by the learned men of their colleges and the holy +men of their churches that this was "the survival of the fittest," it +was nature's way of securing the advancement of the race. + +But now we are preparing for an era of cooperation, and it occurs to our +men of science to go back to nature and find out what really are her +ways. If you will read Kropotkin's "Mutual Aid as a Factor in +Evolution," you will find a complete refutation of the old bourgeois +biology, and a view of nature which reveals in it the germs of human +morality. Kropotkin points out that everywhere throughout nature it is +the social and not the solitary animals which are most numerous and most +successful. There are many millions of ants and bees for every hawk or +eagle, and certainly in the state of nature there were thousands of deer +for every lion or tiger that preyed upon them. And all these social +creatures have their ways of being, which it requires no stress of the +imagination to compare with the tribal customs and the moral codes of +mankind. The different animals prey upon one another, but they do not +prey upon their own species, except in a few rare cases. The only beast +that makes a regular practice of exploiting his own kind is man. + +By hundreds of interesting illustrations Kropotkin shows that mutual aid +and mutual self-protection are the means whereby the higher forms of +being have been evolved. Insects and birds and fish, nearly all the +herbivorous mammals, and even a great many of the carnivores, help one +another and protect one another. The chattering monkeys in the treetops +drove out the saber-tooth tiger from the grove because there were so +many of them, and when they saw him they all set up a shriek and clamor +which deafened and confused him. And when by and by these monkeys +developed an opposed thumb, and broke off a branch of a tree for a club, +and fastened a sharp stone on the end of it for an axe, and fell upon +the saber-toothed tiger and exterminated him, they did it because they +had learned solidarity--even as the workers of the world are today +learning solidarity in the face of the beast of capitalism. + +Man has survived by the cunning of his brain, we are told, and that is +true. But first among the products of that cunning brain has been the +knowledge that by himself he is the most helpless and pitiful of +creatures, while standing together and forming societies and developing +moralities, he is master of the world. He has not yet learned that +lesson entirely; he has learned it only for his own nation. Therefore he +takes the highest skill of his hand and the subtlest wit of his brain, +and uses them to manufacture poison gases. At the present hour he is +painfully realizing that his poison formulas all become known to the +tribes whom he calls his enemies, and so it is his own destruction he is +engaged in contriving. In other words, man has come to a time when his +mechanical skill, his mastery over the forces of nature, has developed +more rapidly than his moral sense and his imaginative sympathy. His +ability to destroy life has become dangerously greater than his desire +to preserve it. So he confronts the fair face of nature as an insane +creature, wrecking not merely everything that he himself has built up, +but everything that nature has built in the ages before him. He is +striving now with infinite agony to make this fact real to himself, and +to mend his evil ways; and the first step in that process is to root out +from his mind the devil's doctrine which in his blindness and greed he +has himself implanted, that there is any way for him to find real +happiness, or to make any worth while progress on this earth, by the +method of inflicting misery and torment upon his fellow men. + + + + +CHAPTER V + +NATURE AND MAN + + (Attempts to show how man has taken control of nature, and is + carrying on her processes and improving upon them.) + + +If the argument of the preceding chapter is sound, human morality is not +a fixed and eternal set of laws, but is, like everything else in the +world, a product of natural evolution. We can trace the history of it, +just as we trace the story of the rocks. It is not a mysterious or +supernatural thing, it is simply the reaction of man to his environment, +and more especially to his fellow men. The source of it is that same +inner impulse, that love of life, that joy in growing, that faith which +appears to be the soul of all being. + +Man is a part of nature and a product of nature; in many fundamental +respects his ways are still nature's ways and his laws still nature's +laws. But there are other and even more significant ways in which man +has separated himself from nature and made himself something quite +different. In order to reveal this clearly, we draw a distinction +between nature and man. This is a proper thing to do, provided we bear +in mind that our classification is not permanent or final. We +distinguish frogs from tadpoles, in spite of the fact that at one stage +the creature is half tadpole and half frog. We distinguish the animal +from the vegetable kingdom, despite the fact that in their lower forms +they cannot be distinguished. + +What, precisely, is the difference between nature and man? The +difference lies in the fact that nature is apparently blind in her +processes; she produces a million eggs in order to give life to one +salmon, she produces countless millions of salmon to be devoured by +other fish apparently no better than salmon. Poets may take up the +doctrine of evolution and dress it out in theological garments, talking +about the "one far off divine event towards which the whole creation +moves," but for all we can see, nature, apart from man, is just as well +satisfied to move in circles, and to come back exactly where she +started. Nature made a whole world of complicated creatures in the +steamy, luke-warm swamps of the Mesozoic era, and then, as if deciding +that the pattern of a large body and a small brain was not a success, +she froze them all to death with a glacial epoch, and we have nothing +but the bones to tell us about them. + +No one understands anything about evolution until he has realized that +the phrase "the survival of the fittest" does not mean the survival of +the best from any human point of view. It merely means the survival of +those capable of surviving in some particular environment. We consider +our present civilization as "fit"; but if astronomical changes should +cause another ice age, we should discover that our "fitness" depended +upon our ability to live on lichens, or on something we could grow by +artificial light in the bowels of the earth. + +So much for our ancient mother, nature. But now--whether we say with the +theologians that it was divine providence, or with the materialist +philosophers that it was an accidental mixing of atoms--at any rate it +has come about that nature has recently produced creatures who are +conscious of her process, who are able to observe and criticize it, to +take up her work and carry it on in their own way, for better or for +worse. Whether by accident or design, there has been on parts of our +planet such a combination of climate and soil as has brought into being +a new product of nature, a heightened form of life which we call +"intelligence." Creation opens its eyes, and beholds the work of the +creator, and decides that it is good--yet not so good as it might be! +Creation takes up the work of the creator, and continues it, in many +respects annulling it, in other respects revising it entirely. Whether a +sonnet is a better or a higher product than a spider is a question it +would be futile to discuss; but this, at least, should be clear--nature +has produced an infinity of spiders, but nature never produced a sonnet, +nor anything resembling it. + +Man, the creature of God, takes over the functions of God. This fact may +shock us, or it may inspire us; to the metaphysically minded it offers a +great variety of fascinating problems. Can it be that God is in process +of becoming, that there is no God until he has become, in us and through +us? H. G. Wells sets forth this curious idea; and then, of course, the +bishops and the clergy rise up in indignation and denounce Mr. Wells as +an upstart and trespasser upon their field. They have been worshipping +their God for some three or four thousand years, and know that He has +been from eternity; He created the world at His will, and how shall +impious man presume to rise up and criticize His product, and imagine +that he can improve upon it? Man, with his cheap and silly little toys, +his sonnets and scientific systems, his symphony concerts and such pale +imitations of celestial harmonies! + +Mr. Wells, in his character of God in the making, has created a bishop +of his own, and no doubt would maintain the thesis that he is a far +better bishop than any created by the God of the Anglican churches. We +will leave Mr. Wells' bishop to argue these problems with God's bishops, +and will merely remind the reader of our warning about these +metaphysical matters. You can prove anything and everything, whichever +and however, all or both; and discussions of the subject are merely your +enunciation of the fact that you have your private truth as you want it. +It may be that there is an Infinite Consciousness, which carries the +whole process of creation in itself, and that all the seeming wastes and +blunders of nature can be explained from some point of view at present +beyond the reach of our minds. On the other hand it may be that +consciousness is now dawning in the universe for the first time. It may +be that it is an accident, a fleeting product like the morning mist on +the mountain top. On the other hand, it may be that it is destined to +grow and expand and take control of the entire universe, as a farmer +takes control of a field for his own purposes. It may be that just as +our individual fragments of intelligence communicate and merge into a +family, a club, a nation, a world culture, so we shall some day grope +our way toward the consciousness of other planets, or of other states of +being subsisting on this planet unknown to us, or perhaps even toward +the cosmic soul, the universal consciousness which we call God. + +But meantime, all we can say with positiveness is this: man, the +created, is becoming the creator. He is taking up the world purpose, he +is imposing upon it new purposes of his own, he is attempting to impose +upon it a moral code, to test it and discipline it by a new standard +which he calls economy. To the present writer this seems the most +significant fact about life, the most fascinating point of view from +which life can be regarded. The reader who wishes to follow it into +greater detail is referred to a little book by Professor E. Ray +Lankester, "The Kingdom of Man"; especially the opening essay, with its +fascinating title, "Nature's Insurgent Son." + +In what ways have the reasoned and deliberate purposes of man revised +and even supplanted the processes of nature? The ways are so many that +it would be easier to mention those in which he has not done so. A +modern civilized man is hardly content with anything that nature does, +nor willing to accept any of nature's products. He will not eat nature's +fruits, he prefers the kinds that he himself has brought into being. He +is not content with the skin that nature has given him; he has made +himself an infinite variety of complicated coverings. He objects to +nature's habit of pouring cold water upon him, and so he has built +himself houses in which he makes his own climate; he has recently taken +to creating for himself houses which roll along the ground, or which fly +through the air, or which swim under the surface of the sea; so he +carries his private climate with him to all these places. It was +nature's custom to remove her blunders and her experiments quickly from +her sight. But man has decided that he loves life so well that he will +preserve even the imbeciles, the lame and the halt and the blind. In a +state of nature, if a man's eyes were not properly focused, he blundered +into the lair of a tiger and was eaten. But civilized man despises such +a method of maintaining the standard of human eyes; he creates for +himself a transparent product, ground to such a curve that it corrects +the focus of his eyes, and makes them as good as any other eyes. In ten +thousand such ways we might name, man has rebelled against the harshness +of his ancient mother, and has freed himself from her control. + +But still he is the child of his mother, and so it is his way to act +first, and then to realize what he has done. So it comes about that very +few, even of the most highly educated men, are aware how completely the +ancient ways of nature have been suppressed by her "insurgent son." It +is a good deal as in the various trades and professions which have +developed with such amazing rapidity in modern civilization; the paper +man knows how to make paper, the shoe man knows how to make shoes, the +optician knows about grinding glasses, but none of these knows very much +about the others' specialties, and has no realization of how far the +other has gone. So it comes about that in our colleges we are still +teaching ancient and immutable "laws of nature," which in the actual +practice of men at work are as extinct and forgotten as the dodo. In all +colleges, except a few which have been tainted by Socialist thought, +the students are solemnly learning the so-called "Malthusian law," that +population presses continually upon the limits of subsistence, there are +always a few more people in every part of the world than that part of +the world is able to maintain. At any time we increase the world's +productive powers, population will increase correspondingly, so there +can never be an end to human misery, and abortion, war and famine are +simply nature's eternal methods of adjusting man to his environment. + +Thus solemnly we are taught in the colleges. And yet, nine out of ten of +the students come from homes where the parents have discovered the +modern practice of birth control; all the students are themselves +finding out about it in one way or another, and will proceed when they +marry to restrict themselves to two or three children. In vain will the +ghost of their favorite statesman and hero, Theodore Roosevelt, be +traveling up and down the land, denouncing them for the dreadful crime +of "race suicide"--that is to say, their presuming to use their reason +to put an end to the ghastly situation revealed by the Malthusian law, +over-population eternally recurring and checked by abortion, war and +famine! In vain will the ghost of their favorite saint and moralist, +Anthony Comstock, be traveling up and down the land, putting people in +jail for daring to teach to poor women what every rich woman knows, and +for attempting to change the entirely man-made state of affairs whereby +an intelligent and self-governing Anglo-Saxon land is being in two or +three generations turned over to a slum population of Italians, Poles, +Hungarians, Portuguese, French-Canadians, Mexicans and Japanese! + +Likewise in every orthodox college the student is taught what his +professors are pleased to call "the law of diminishing returns of +agriculture." That is to say, additional labor expended upon a plot of +land does not result in an equal increase of produce, and the increase +grows less, until finally you come to a time when no matter how much +labor you expend, you can get no more produce from that plot of land. +All professors teach this, because fifty years ago it was true, and +since that time it has not occurred to any professor of political +science to visit a farm. And all the while, out in the suburbs of the +city where the college is located, market gardeners are practicing on an +enormous scale a new system of intensive agriculture which makes the +"law of diminishing returns" a foolish joke. + +As Kropotkin shows in his book, "Fields, Factories and Workshops," the +modern intensive gardener, by use of glass and the chemical test-tube, +has developed an entirely new science of plant raising. He is +independent of climate, he makes his own climate; he is independent of +the defects of the soil, he would just as soon start from nothing and +make his soil upon an asphalt pavement. By doubling his capital +investment he raises, not twice as much produce, but ten times as much. +If his methods were applied to the British Isles, he could raise +sufficient produce on this small surface to feed the population of the +entire globe. + +So we see that by simple and entirely harmless devices man is in +position to restrict or to increase population as he sees fit. Also he +is in position to raise food and produce the necessities of life for a +hundred or thousand times as many people as are now on the earth. But +superstition ordains involuntary parenthood, and capitalism ordains that +land shall be held out of use for speculation, or shall be exploited for +rent! And this is done in the name of "nature"--that old nature of the +"tooth and claw," whose ancient plan it is "that they shall take who +have the power, and they shall keep who can"; that ancient nature which +has been so entirely suppressed and supplanted by civilized man, and +which survives only as a ghost, a skeleton to be resurrected from the +tomb, for the purpose of frightening the enslaved. When a predatory +financier wishes a fur overcoat to protect himself from the cold, or +when he hires a masseur to keep up the circulation of his blood, you do +not find him troubling himself about the laws of "nature"; never will he +mention this old scarecrow, except when he is trying to persuade the +workers of the world to go on paying him tribute for the use of the +natural resources of the earth! + + + + +CHAPTER VI + +MAN THE REBEL + + (Shows the transition stage between instinct and reason, in which + man finds himself, and how he can advance to a securer condition.) + + +In the state of nature you find every creature living a precarious +existence, incessantly beset by enemies; and the creature survives only +so long as it keeps itself at the top of its form. The result is the +maintenance of the type in its full perfection, and, under the +competitive pressure, a gradual increase of its powers. Excepting when +sudden eruptions of natural forces occur, every creature is perfectly +provided with a set of instincts for all emergencies; it is in +harmonious relationship to its environment, it knows how to do what it +has to do, and even its fears and its pains serve for its protection. +But now comes man and overthrows this state of nature, abolishes the +competitive struggle, and changes at his own insolent will both his +environment and his reaction thereto. + +Man's changes are, in the beginning, all along one line; they are for +his own greater comfort, the avoidance of the inconveniences of nature +and the stresses of the competitive struggle. In a state of nature there +are no fat animals, but in civilization there are not merely fat +animals, but fat men to eat the fat animals. In a state of nature no +animal loafs very long; it has to go out and hunt its food again. But +man, by his superior cunning, compels the animals to work for him, and +also his fellow men. So he produces unlimited wealth for himself; not +merely can he eat and drink and sleep all he wants, but he builds a +whole elaborate set of laws and moral customs and religious codes about +this power, he invents manners and customs and literatures and arts, +expressive of his superiority to nature and to his fellow men, and of +his ability to enslave and exploit them. So he destroys for his +imperious self the beneficent guardianship which nature had maintained +over him; he develops a thousand complicated diseases, a thousand +monstrous abnormalities of body and mind and spirit. And each one of +these diseases and abnormalities is a new life of its own; it develops +a body of knowledge, a science, and perhaps an art; it becomes the means +of life, the environment and the determining destiny of thousands, +perhaps millions, of human beings. So continues the growth of the +colossal structure which we call civilization--in part still healthy and +progressive, but in part as foul and deadly as a gigantic cancer. + +What is to be done about this cancer? First of all, it must be +diagnosed, the extent of it precisely mapped out and the causes of it +determined. Man, the rebel, has rejected his mother nature, and has lost +and for the most part forgotten the instincts with which she provided +him. He has destroyed the environment which, however harsh to the +individual, was beneficent to the race, and has set up in the place of +it a gigantic pleasure-house, with talking machines and moving pictures +and soda fountains and manicure parlors and "gents' furnishing +establishments." + +Shall we say that man is to go back to a state of nature, that he shall +no longer make asylums for the insane and homes for the defective, +eye-glasses for the astigmatic and malted milk for the dyspeptic? There +are some who preach that. Among the multitude of strange books and +pamphlets which come in my mail, I found the other day a volume from +England, "Social Chaos and the Way Out," by Alfred Baker Read, a learned +and imposing tome of 364 pages, wherein with all the paraphernalia of +learning it is gravely maintained that the solution for the ills of +civilization is a return to the ancient Greek practice of infanticide. +Every child at birth is to be examined by a committee of physicians, and +if it is found to possess any defect, or if the census has established +that there are enough babies in the world for the present, this baby +shall be mercifully and painlessly asphyxiated. You might think that +this is a joke, after the fashion of Swift's proposal for eating the +children of famine-stricken Ireland. I have spent some time examining +this book before I risk committing myself to the statement that it is +the work of a sober scientist, with no idea whatever of fun. + +If we are going to think clearly on this subject, the first point we +have to understand is that nature has nothing to do with it. We cannot +appeal to nature, because we are many thousands of years beyond her +sway. We left her when the first ape came down from the treetop and +fastened a sharp stone in the end of his club; we bade irrevocable +good-bye to her when the first man kept himself from freezing and +altered his diet by means of fire. Therefore, it is no argument to say +that this, that, or the other remedy is "unnatural." Our choice will lie +among a thousand different courses, but the one thing we may be sure of +is that none of them will be "natural." Bairnsfather, in one of his war +cartoons, portrays a British officer on leave, who got homesick for the +trenches and went out into the garden and dug himself a hole in the mud +and sat shivering in the rain all night. And this amuses us vastly; but +we should be even more amused if any kind of reformer, physician, +moralist, clergyman or legislator should suggest to us any remedy for +our ills that was really "according to nature." + +Civilized man, creature of art and of knowledge, has no love for nature +except as an object for the play of his fancy and his wit. He means to +live his own life, he means to hold himself above nature with all his +powers. Yet, obviously, he cannot go on accumulating diseases, he cannot +give his life-blood to the making of a cancer while his own proper +tissues starve. He must somehow divert the flow of his energies, his +social blood-stream, so to speak, from the cancer to the healthy growth. +To abandon the metaphor, man will determine by the use of his reason +what he wishes life to be; he will choose the highest forms of it to +which he can attain. He will then, by the deliberate act of his own +will, devote his energies to those tasks; he will make for himself new +laws, new moral codes, new customs and ways of thought, calculated to +bring to reality the ideal which he has formed. So only can man justify +himself as a creator, so can he realize the benefit and escape the +penalties of his revolt from his ancient mother. + +And then, perhaps, we shall make the discovery that we have come back to +nature, only in a new form. Nature, harsh and cruel, wasteful and blind +as we call her, yet had her deep wisdom; she cared for the species, she +protected and preserved the type. Man, in his new pride of power, has +invented a philosophy which he dignifies by the name of "individualism." +He lives and works for himself; he chooses to wear silk shirts, and to +break the speed limit, and to pin ribbons and crosses on his chest. Now +what he must do with his new morality, if he wishes to save himself from +degeneration, is to manifest the wisdom and far vision of the old +mother whom he spurned, and to say to himself, deliberately, as an act +of high daring: I will protect the species, I will preserve the type! I +will deny myself the raptures of alcoholic intoxication, because it +damages the health of my offspring; I will deny myself the amusement of +sexual promiscuity for the same reason. I will devise imitations of the +chase and of battle in order that I may keep my physical body up to the +best standard of nature. Because I understand that all civilized life is +based upon intelligence, I will acquire knowledge and spread it among my +fellow men. Because I perceive that civilization is impossible without +sympathy, and because sympathy makes it impossible for me to be happy +while my fellow men are ignorant and degraded, therefore I dedicate my +energies to the extermination of poverty, war, parasitism and all forms +of exploitation of man by his fellows. + +Professor William James is the author of an excellent essay entitled "A +Moral Equivalent for War." He sets forth the idea that men have loved +war through the ages because it has called forth their highest efforts, +has made them more fully aware of the powers of their being. He asks, +May it not be possible for man, of his own free impulse, born of his +love of life and the wonderful potentialities which it unfolds, to +invent for himself a discipline, a code based, not upon the destruction +of other men and their enslavement, but upon cooperative emulation in +the unfoldment of the powers of the mind? That this can be done by men, +I have never doubted. That it will be done, and done quickly, has been +made certain by the late world conflict, which has demonstrated to all +thinking people that the progress of the mechanical arts has been such +that man is now able to inflict upon his own civilization more damage +than it is able to endure. + + + + +CHAPTER VII + +MAKING OUR MORALS + + (Attempts to show that human morality must change to fit human + facts, and there can be no judge of it save human reason.) + + +Assuming the argument of the preceding chapters to be accepted, it +appears that human life is in part at least a product of human will, +guided by human intelligence. Man finds himself in the position of the +crew of a ship in the middle of the ocean; he does not know exactly how +the ship was made, or how it came to be in its present position, but he +has discovered how the engines are run, and how the ship is steered, and +the meaning of the compass. So now he takes charge of the ship, and +keeps it afloat amid many perils; and meantime, on the bridge of the +vessel, there goes on a furious argument over the question what port the +ship shall be steered to and what chart shall be used. + +It is not well as a rule to trust to similes, but this simile is useful +because it helps us to realize how fluid and changeable are the +conditions of man's life, and how incessant and urgent the problems with +which he finds himself confronted. The moral and legal codes of mankind +may be compared to the steering orders which are given to the helmsman +of the vessel. Northeast by north, he is told; and if during the night a +heavy wind arises, and pushes the bow of the vessel off to starboard, +then the helmsman has to push the wheel in the opposite direction. If he +does not do so, he may find that his vessel has swung around and is +going to some other part of the world. Next morning the passengers may +wake up and find the ship on the rocks--because the helmsman persisted +in following certain steering directions which were laid down in an +ancient Hebrew book two or three thousand years ago! + +If life is a continually changing product, then the laws which govern +conduct must also be continually changing, and morality is a problem of +continuous adjustment to new circumstances and new needs. If man is free +to work upon this changing environment, he must be free to make new +tools and devise new processes. If it is the task of reason to choose +among many possible courses and many possible varieties of life, then +clearly it is man's duty to examine and revise every detail of his laws +and customs and moral codes. + +This is, of course, in flat contradiction to the teachings of all +religions. So far as I know there is no religion which does not teach +that the conduct of man in certain matters has been eternally fixed by +some higher power, and that it is man's duty to conform to these rules. +It is considered to be wicked even to suggest any other idea; in fact, +to do so is the most wicked thing in the world, far more dangerous than +any actual infraction of the code, whatever it may be. + +Let us see how this works out in practice. Let us take, for a test, the +Ten Commandments. These commandments were graven upon stone tablets some +four thousand years ago, and are supposed to have been valid ever since. +"Thou shalt not kill," is one; others phrase it, "Thou shall do no +murder"; and in this double version we see at once the beginnings of +controversy. If you are a Quaker, you accept the former version, while +if you are a member of the military general staff of your country you +accept the latter. You maintain the right to kill your fellow men, +provided that those who do the killing have been previously clad in a +special uniform, indicating their distinctive function as killers of +their fellow men. You maintain, in other words, the right of making war; +and presently, when you get into making war, you find yourself +maintaining the right to kill, not merely by the old established method +of the sword and the bullet, but by means of poison gases which destroy +the lives of women and children, perhaps a whole city full at a time. + +And also, of course, you maintain the right to kill, provided the +killing has been formally ordered and sanctioned by a man who sits upon +a raised bench and wears a black robe, and perhaps a powdered wig. You +consider that by the simple device of putting this man into a black robe +and a powdered wig, you endow him with authority to judge and revise the +divine law. In other words, you subject this divine law to human reason; +and if some religious fanatic refuses to be so subjected, you call him +by the dread name "pacifist," and if he attempts to preach his idea, you +send him to prison for ten or twenty years, which means in actual +practice that you kill him by the slow effects of malnutrition and +tubercular infection. If he is ordered to put on the special costume of +killing, and refuses to do so, you call him a "C. O.," and you bully and +beat him, and perhaps administer to him the "water cure" in your +dungeons. + +Or take the commandment that we shall not commit adultery. Surely this +is a law about which we can agree! But presently we discover that +unhappily married couples desire to part, and that if we do not allow +them to part, we actually cause the commission of a great deal more +adultery than otherwise. Therefore, our wise men meet together, and +revise this divine law, and decide that it is not adultery if a man +takes another wife, provided he has received from a judge an engraved +piece of paper permitting him to do so. But some of the followers of +religion refuse to admit this right of mere mortal man. The Catholic +Church attempts to enforce its own laws, and declares that people who +divorce and remarry are really living in adultery and committing mortal +sin. The Episcopal Church does not go quite so far as that; it allows +the innocent party in the divorce to remarry. Other churches are content +to accept the state law as it stands. Is it not manifest that all these +groups are applying human reason, and nothing but human reason, to the +interpreting and revising of their divine commandments? + +Or take the law, "Thou shalt not steal." Surely we can all agree upon +that! Let us do so; but our agreement gets us nowhere, because we have +to set up a human court to decide what is "stealing." Is it stealing to +seize upon land, and kill the occupants of it, and take the land for +your own, and hand it down to your children forever? Yes, of course, +that is stealing, you say; but at once you have to revise your +statement. It is not stealing if it was done a sufficient number of +years ago; in that case the results of it are sanctified by law, and +held unchangeable forever. Also, we run up against the fact that it is +not stealing, if it is done by the State, by men who have been dressed +up in the costume of killers before they commit the act. + +Again, is it stealing to hold land out of use for speculation, while +other men are starving and dying for lack of land to labor upon? Some of +us call this stealing, but we are impolitely referred to as "radicals," +and if we venture to suggest that anyone should resist this kind of +stealing, we are sentenced to slow death from malnutrition and +tubercular infection. Again, is it stealing for a victim of our system +of land monopoly to take a loaf of bread in order to save the life of +his starving child? The law says that this is stealing, and sends the +man to jail for this act; yet the common sense of mankind protests, and +I have heard a great many respectable Americans venture so far in +"radicalism" as to say that they themselves would steal under such +circumstances. + +One could pile up illustrations without limit; but this is enough to +make clear the point, that it is perfectly futile to attempt to talk +about "divine" rules for human conduct. Regardless of any ideas you may +hold, or any wishes, you are forced at every hour of your life to apply +your reason to the problems of your life, and you have no escape from +the task of judging and deciding. All that you do is to judge right or +to judge wrong; and if you judge wrong, you inflict misery upon yourself +and upon all who come into contact with you. How much more sensible, +therefore, to recognize the fact of moral and intellectual +responsibility; to investigate the data of life with which you have to +deal, the environment by which you are surrounded, and to train your +judgment so that you will be able to fit yourself to it with quickness +and certainty! + +"But," the believer in religion will say, "this leaves mankind without +any guide or authority. How can human beings act, how can they deal with +one another, if there are no laws, no permanent moral codes?" + +The answer is that to accept the idea of the evolution of morality does +not mean at all that there will be no permanent laws and working +principles. Many of the facts of life are fixed for all practical +purposes--the purposes not merely of your life and my life, but the life +of many generations. We are not likely to see in our time the end of the +ancient Hebrew announcement that "the sins of the father are visited +upon the children"; therefore it is possible for us to study out a +course of action based upon the duty of every father to hand down to his +children the gift of a sound mind in a sound body. The Catholic Church +has had for a thousand years or more the "mortal sin" of gluttony upon +its list; and today comes experimental science with its new weapons of +research, and discovers autointoxication and the hardening of the +arteries, and makes it very unlikely that the moral codes of men will +ever fail to list gluttony as a mortal sin. Indeed, science has added to +gluttony, not merely drunkenness, but all use of alcoholic liquor for +beverage purposes; we have done this in spite of the manifest fact that +the drinking of wine was not merely an Old Testament virtue, but a New +Testament religious rite. + +To say that human life changes, and that new discoveries and new powers +make necessary new laws and moral customs, is to say something so +obvious that it might seem a waste of paper and ink. Man has invented +the automobile and has crowded himself into cities, and so has to adopt +a rigid set of traffic regulations. So far as I know, it has never +occurred to any religious enthusiast to seek in the book of Revelation +for information as to the advisability of the "left hand turn" at +Broadway and Forty-second Street, New York, at five o'clock in the +afternoon. But modern science has created new economic facts, just as +unprecedented as the automobile; it has created new possibilities of +spending and new possibilities of starving for mankind; it has made new +cravings and new satisfactions, new crimes and new virtues; and yet the +great mass of our people are still seeking to guide themselves in their +readjustments to these new facts by ancient codes which have no more +relationship to these facts than they have to the affairs of Mars! + +I am acquainted with a certain lady, one of the kindest and most devoted +souls alive, who seeks to solve the problems of her life, and of her +large family of children and grand-children, according to sentences +which she picks out, more or less at random, from certain more or less +random chapters of ancient Hebrew literature. This lady will find some +words which she imagines apply to the matter, and will shut her devout +eyes to the fact that there are other "texts," bearing on the matter, +which say exactly the opposite. She will place the strangest and most +unimaginable interpretations upon the words, and yet will be absolutely +certain that her interpretation is the voice of God speaking directly to +her. If you try to tell her about Socialism, she will say, "The poor ye +have always with you"; which means that it is interfering with Divine +Providence to try to remedy poverty on any large scale. This lady is +ready instantly to relieve any single case of want; she regards it as +her duty to do this; in fact, she considers that the purpose of some +people's poverty is to provide her with a chance to do the noble action +of relieving it. You would think that the meaning of the sentence, +"Spare the rod and spoil the child," would be so plain that no one +could mistake it; but this good lady understood it to mean that God +forbade the physical chastisement of children, and preferred them +"spoiled." She held this idea for half a lifetime--until it was pointed +out to her that the sentence was not in the Bible, but in "Hudibras," an +old English poem! + + + + +CHAPTER VIII + +THE VIRTUE OF MODERATION + + (Attempts to show that wise conduct is an adjustment of means to + ends, and depends upon the understanding of a particular set of + circumstances.) + + +Some years ago I used to know an ardent single tax propagandist who +found my way of arguing intensely irritating, because, as he phrased it, +I had "no principles." We would be discussing, for example, a protective +tariff, and I would wish to collect statistics, but discovered to my +bewilderment that to my single tax friend a customs duty was "stealing" +on the part of the government. The government had a right to tax land, +because that was the gift of nature, but it had no right to tax the +products of human labor, and when it took a portion of the goods which +anyone brought into a country, the government was playing the part of a +robber. Of course such a man was annoyed by the suggestion that in the +early stages of a country's development it might possibly be a good +thing for the country to make itself independent and self-sufficient by +encouraging the development of its manufactures; that, on the other +hand, when these manufactures had grown to such a size that they +controlled the government, it might be an excellent thing for the +country to subject them to the pressure of foreign competition, in order +to lower their value as a preliminary to socializing them. + +The reader who comes to this book looking for hard and fast rules of +life will be disappointed. It would be convenient if someone could lay +down for us a moral code, and lift from our shoulders the inconvenient +responsibility of deciding about our own lives. There may be persons so +weak that they have to have the conditions of their lives thus +determined for them; but I am not writing for such persons. I am writing +for adult and responsible individuals, and I bear in mind that every +individual is a separate problem, with separate needs and separate +duties. There are, of course, a good many rules that apply to everybody +in almost all emergencies, but I cannot think of a single rule that I +would be willing to say I would apply in my life without a single +exception. "Thou shalt not kill" is a rule that I have followed, so far +without exception; but as soon as I turn my imagination loose, I can +think of many circumstances under which I should kill. I remember +discussing the matter with a pacifist friend of mine, an out-and-out +religious non-resistant. I pointed out to him that people sometimes went +insane, and in that condition they sometimes seized hatchets and killed +anyone in sight. What would my pacifist friend do if he saw a maniac +attacking his children with a hatchet? It did not help him to say that +he would use all possible means short of killing the maniac; he had +finally to admit that if he were quite sure it was a question of the +life of the maniac or the life of his child, he would kill. And this is +not mere verbal quibbling, because such things do happen in the world, +and people are confronted with such emergencies, and they have to +decide, and no rule is a general rule if it has a single exception. +There is a saying that "the exception proves the rule," but this is very +silly; it is a mistranslation of the Latin word "probat," which means, +not proves, but tests. No exception can prove a rule. What the exception +does is to test the rule by showing that the result does not follow in +the exceptional case. + +The only kind of rule which can be laid down for human conduct is a rule +in such general terms that it escapes exceptions by leaving the matter +open for every man's difference of opinion. Any kind of rule which is +specific will sooner or later pass out of date. Take, by way of +illustration, the ancient and well-established virtue of frugality. +Obviously, under a state of nature, or of economic competition, it is +necessary for every man to lay by a store "for a rainy day." But suppose +we could set up a condition of economic security, under which society +guaranteed to every man the full product of his labor, and the old and +the sick were fully taken care of--then how foolish a man would seem who +troubled to acquire a surplus of goods! It would be as if we saw him +riding on horseback through the main street of our town in a full suit +of armor! + +I devote a good deal of space to this question of a fixed and +unchangeable morality, because it is one of the heaviest burdens that +mankind carries upon its back. The record of human history is sickening, +not so much because of blood and slaughter, but because of fanaticism; +because wherever the mind of man attempts to assert itself, to escape +from the blind rule of animal greed, it adopts a set of formulas, and +proceeds to enforce them, regardless of consequences, upon the whole of +life. Consider, for example, the rule of the Puritans in England. The +Puritans glorified conscience, and it is perfectly proper to glorify +conscience, but not to the entire suppression of the beauty-making +faculties in man. Macaulay summed up the Puritan point of view in the +sentence that they objected to bear-baiting, not because it gave pain to +the bear, but because it gave pleasure to the spectators. As a result of +applying that principle, and lacing mankind in a straight-jacket by +legislation, England swung back into a reaction under the Cavaliers, in +which debauchery held more complete sway than ever before or since in +English life. + +This is a hard lesson, but it must be learned: there is no virtue that +does not become a vice if it is carried to extremes; there is no virtue +that does not become a vice if it is applied at the wrong time, or under +the wrong circumstances, or at the wrong stage of human development. In +fact, we may say that most vices are virtues misapplied. The so-called +natural vices are simply natural impulses carried to excess, while the +unnatural vices result from the suppression and distortion of natural +impulses. The Greeks had as their supreme virtue what they called +"sophrosune." It is a beautiful word, worth remembering; it means a +beautiful quality called moderation. We shall find, as we come to +investigate, that life is a series of compromises among many different +needs, many different desires, many different duties; and reason sits as +a wise and patient judge, and appoints to each its proper portion, and +denies to it an excess which would starve the others. Such is true +morality, and it is incompatible with the existence of any fixed code, +whether of human origin or divine. + +The fixed morality is a survival of a far-off past, of the days of +instinct and servitude. Human reason has developed but slowly, and +perhaps only a few people are as yet entirely capable of taking control +of their own destiny; perhaps it is really dangerous to think for +oneself! But if we investigate carefully, we may decide that the danger +is not so much to ourselves as it is to others. The most evil of all the +habits that man has inherited from his far-off past is the habit of +exploiting his fellows, and in order to exploit them more safely the +ruling castes of priests and kings and nobles and property owners have +taken possession of the moralities of the world and shaped them for +their own convenience. They have taught the slave virtues of credulity +and submission; they have surrounded their teachings with all the +terrors of the supernatural; they have placed upon rebellion the +penalties, not merely of this world, but of the next, not merely of the +dungeon and the rack, but of hellfire and brimstone. + +I do not wish to go to extremes and say that the moral codes now taught +in the world are made wholly in this evil way. As a matter of fact they +are a queer jumble of the two elements, the slave terrors of the past +and the common sense of the present. There is not one moral code in the +world today, there are many. There is one for the rich, and an entirely +different one for the poor, and the rich have had a great deal more to +do with shaping the code of the poor than the poor have had to do with +shaping the code of the rich. There is one code for governments, and an +entirely different one for the victims of governments. There is one code +for business, and an entirely different one, a far more human and decent +one, for friendship. Above all, there is one code for Sunday and another +code for the other six days of the week. Most of our idealisms and our +sentimental fine phrases we reserve for our Sunday code, while for our +every-day code we go back to the rule of the jungle: "Dog eat dog," or +"Do unto others as they would do unto you, but do it first." When you +attempt to suggest a new moral code to our present day moral +authorities, it is the fine phrases of the Sunday code they bring out +for exhibition purposes; and perhaps you are impressed by their +arguments--until Monday morning, when you attempt to apply this code at +the office, and they stare at you in bewilderment, or burst out laughing +in your face. + +What I am trying to do here is to outline a code that will not be a +matter of phrases but a matter of practice. It will apply to all men, +rich as well as poor, and to all seven days of the week. I am not so +much suggesting a code, as pointing out to you how you can work out your +own code for yourself. I am suggesting that you should adopt it, not +because I tell you to, but because you yourself have taken it and tested +it, precisely as you would test any other of the practical affairs of +your life--potatoes as an article of diet, or some particular sack of +potatoes that a peddler was trying to sell to you. It is not yet +possible for you to be as sure about everything in your life as you can +be about a sack of potatoes; human knowledge has not got that far; but +at least you can know what is to be known, and if anything is a matter +of uncertainty, you can know that. Such knowledge is often the most +important of all--just as the driver of an automobile wants to know if a +bridge is not to be depended on. + +So I say to you that if you want to find happiness in this life, look +with distrust upon all absolutes and ultimates, all hard and fast rules, +all formulas and dogmas and "general principles." Bear in mind that +there are many factors in every case, there are many complications in +every human being, there are many sides to every question. Try to keep +an open mind and an even temper. Try to take an interest in learning +something new every day, and in trying some new experiment. This is the +scientific attitude toward life; this is the way of growth and of true +success. It is inconvenient, because it involves working your brains, +and most people have not been taught to do this, and find it the hardest +kind of work there is. But how much better it is to think for yourself, +and to protect yourself, than to trust your thinking to some group of +people whose only interest may be to exploit you for their advantage! + + + + +CHAPTER IX + +THE CHOOSING OF LIFE + + (Discusses the standards by which we may judge what is best in + life, and decide what we wish to make of it.) + + +We have made the point about evolution, that it may go forward or it may +go backward. There is no guarantee in nature that because a thing +changes, it must necessarily become better than it was. On the contrary, +degeneration is as definitely established a fact as growth, and it is of +the utmost importance, in studying the problem of human happiness and +how to make it, to get clear the fact that nature has produced, and +continues to produce, all kinds of monstrosities and parasites and +failures and abortions. And all these blunders of our great mother +struggle just as hard, desire life just as ardently as normal creatures, +and suffer just as cruelly when they fail. Blind optimism about life is +just as fatuous and just as dangerous as blind pessimism, and if we +propose to take charge of life, and to make it over, we shall find that +we have to get quickly to the task of deciding what our purpose is. + +"Choose well, your choice is brief and yet endless," says Carlyle. You +are driven in your choice by two facts--first, that you have to choose, +regardless of whether you want to or not; and second, that upon your +choice depend infinite possibilities of happiness or of misery. The +interdependence of life is such that you are choosing not merely for the +present, but for the future; you are choosing for your posterity +forever, and to some extent you are choosing for all mankind. Matthew +Arnold has said that "Conduct is three-fourths of life"; but I, for my +part, have never been able to see where he got his figures. It seems to +me that conduct is practically everything in life that really counts. +Conduct is not merely marriage and birth and premature death; it is not +merely eating and drinking and sleeping: it is thinking and aspiring; it +is religion and science, music and literature and art. It is not yet the +lightning and the cyclone, but with the spread of knowledge it is coming +to be these things, and I suspect that some day it may be even the comet +and the rising of the sun. + +We are now going to apply our reason to this enormous problem of human +conduct; we are going to ask ourselves the question: What kind of life +do we want? What kind of life are we going to make? What are the +standards by which we may know excellence in life, and distinguish it +from failure and waste and blunder in life? Obviously, when we have done +this, we shall have solved the moral problem; all we shall have to say +is, act so that your actions help to bring the desirable things into +being, and do not act so as to hinder or weaken them. + +We shall not be able to go to nature to settle this question for us. +This is our problem, not nature's. But we shall find, as usual, that we +can pick up precious hints from her; we shall be wise to study her ways, +and learn from her successes and her failures. We are proud of her +latest product, ourselves. Let us see how she made us; what were the +stages on the way to man? + +First in the scale of evolution, it appears, came inert matter. We call +it inert, because it looks that way, though we know, of course, that it +consists of infinite numbers of molecules vibrating with speed which we +can measure even though we cannot imagine it. This "matter" is +enormously fascinating, and a wise man will hesitate to speak +patronizingly about it. Nevertheless, considering matter apart from the +mind which studies it, we decide that it represents a low stage of +being. We speak contemptuously of stones and clods and lumps of clay. We +award more respect to things like mountains and tempest-tossed oceans, +because they are big; in the early days of our race we used to worship +these things, but now we think of them merely as the raw material of +life, and we should not be in the least interested in becoming a +mountain or an ocean. + +Almost everyone would agree, therefore, that what we call "life" is a +higher and more important achievement of nature. And if we wish to grade +this life, we do so according to its sentience--that is to say, the +amount and intensity of the consciousness which grows in it. We are +interested in the one-celled organisms which swarm everywhere throughout +nature, and we study the mysterious processes by which they nourish and +beget themselves; we suspect that they have a germ of consciousness in +them; but we are surer of the meaning and importance of the +consciousness we detect in some complex organism like a fish or bird. +We learn to know the signs of consciousness, of dawning intelligence, +and we esteem the various kinds of creatures according to the amount of +it they possess. We reject mere physical bigness and mere strength. +Joyce Kilmer may write: + + "Poems are made by men like me, + But only God can make a tree"-- + +And that seems to us a charming bit of fancy; but the common sense of +the thing is voiced to us much better in the lines of old Ben Jonson: + + "It is not growing like a tree + In bulk doth make man better be." + +If we take two animals of equal bulk, the hippopotamus and the elephant, +we shall be far more interested in the elephant, because of the +intelligence and what we call "character" which he displays. There are +good elephants and bad elephants, kind ones and treacherous ones. We +love the dog because we can make a companion of him; that is, because we +can teach him to react to human stimuli. Of all animals we are +fascinated most by the monkey, because he is nearest to man, and +displays the keenest intelligence. + +Someone may say that this is all mere human egotism, and that we have no +way of really being sure that the life of elephants and hippopotami is +not more interesting and significant than the life of men. Never having +been either of these animals, I cannot say with assurance; but I know +that I have the power to exterminate these creatures, or to pen them in +cages, and they are helpless to protect themselves, or even to +understand what is happening to them. So I am irresistibly driven to +conclude that intelligence is more safe and more worth while than +unintelligence; in short, that intelligence is nature's highest product +up to date, and that to foster and develop it is the best guess I can +make as to the path of wisdom--that is, of intelligence! + +When we come to deal with human values, we find that we can trace much +the same kind of evolution. Back in the days of the cave man, it was +physical strength which dominated the horde; but nowadays, except in the +imagination of the small boy, the "strong man" does not cut much of a +figure. We go once, perhaps, to see him lift his heavy weights and +break his iron bars, but then we are tired of him. Mere strength had to +yield in the struggle for life to quickness of eye and hand, to energy +which for lack of a better name we may call "nervous." The pugilist who +has nothing but muscle goes down before his lighter antagonist who can +keep out of his reach, and the crowd loves the football hero who can +duck and dodge and make the long runs. One might cite a thousand +illustrations, such as the British bowmen breaking down the heavily +armored knights, or the quick-moving, light vessels of Britain +overcoming the huge galleons of Spain. And as society develops and +becomes more complex, the fighting man becomes less and less a man of +muscle, and more and more a man of "nerve." Alexander, Caesar and +Napoleon would have stood a poor chance in personal combat against many +of their followers. They led, because they were men of energy and +cunning, able to maintain the subtle thing we call prestige. + +Now the world has moved into an industrial era, and who are the great +men of our time, the men whose lightest words are heeded, whose doings +are spread upon the front pages of our newspapers? Obviously, they are +the men of money. We may pretend to ourselves that we do not really +stand in awe of a Morgan or a Rockefeller, but that we admire, let us +say, an Edison or a Roosevelt. But Edison himself is a man of money, and +will tell you that he had to be a man of money in order to be free to +conduct his experiments. As for our politicians and statesmen, they +either serve the men of money, or the men of money suppress them, as +they did Roosevelt. The Morgans and the Rockefellers do not do much +talking; they do not have to. They content themselves with being obeyed, +and the shaping of our society is in their hands. + +And yet, some of us really believe that there are higher faculties in +man than the ability to manipulate the stock market. We consider that +the great inventor, the great poet, the great moralist, contributes more +to human happiness than the man who, by cunning and persistence, +succeeds in monopolizing some material necessity of human life. "Poets," +says Shelley, "are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind." If this +strange statement is anywhere near to truth, it is surely of importance +that we should decide what are the higher powers in men, and how they +may be recognized, and how fostered and developed. + +What is, in its essence, the process of evolution from the lower to the +higher forms of mental life? It is a process of expanding consciousness; +the developing of ability to apprehend a wider and wider circle of +existence, to share it, to struggle for it as we do for the life we call +our "own." The test of the higher mental forms is therefore a test of +universality, of sympathetic inclusiveness; or, to use commoner words, +it is a test of enlightened unselfishness. + +Every human individual has the will to life, the instinct of +self-preservation, which persuades him that he is of importance; but the +test of his development is his ability to realize that, important though +he may be, he is but a small part of the universe, and his highest +interests are not in himself alone, his highest duties are not owed to +himself alone. And as the life becomes more of the intellect, this fact +becomes more and more obvious, more and more dominating. Men who +monopolize the material things of the world and their control are +necessarily self-seeking; but in the realm of the higher faculties this +element, in the very nature of the case, is forced into the background. +It is evident that truth is not truth for the Standard Oil Company, nor +for J. P. Morgan and Company, nor yet for the government of the United +States; it is truth for the whole of mankind, and one who sincerely +labors for the truth does so for the universal benefit. + +There may be, of course, an element of selfishness in the activities of +poets and inventors. They may be seeking for fame; they may be hoping to +make money out of their discoveries; but the greatest men we know have +been dominated by an overwhelming impulse of creation, and when we read +their lives, and discover in them signs of petty vanity or jealousy or +greed, we are pained and shocked. What touches us most deeply is some +mark of self-consecration and humility; as, for example, when Newton +tells us that after all his life's labors he felt himself as a little +child gathering sea-shells on the shore of the great ocean of truth; or +when Alfred Russel Wallace, discovering that Darwin had been working +longer than himself over the theory of the origin of species, generously +withdrew and permitted the theory to go to the world in Darwin's name. + +There are three faculties in man, usually described as intellect, +feeling and will. According as one or the other faculty predominates, +we have a great scientist, a great poet, or a great moralist. We might +choose a representative of each type--let us say Newton, Shakespeare and +Jesus--and spend much time in controversy as to which of the three types +is the greatest, which makes the greatest contribution to human +happiness. But it will suffice here to point out that the three +faculties do not exclude one another; every man must have all three, and +a perfectly rounded man should seek to develop all three. Jesus was +considerable of a poet, and we should pay far less heed to Shakespeare +if he had not been a moralist. Also there have been instances of great +poets and painters who were scientists--for example, Leonardo and +Goethe. + +The fundamental difference between the scientist and the poet is that +one is exploring nature and discovering things which actually exist, +whereas the other is creating new life out of his own spirit. But the +poet will find that his creations take but little hold upon life, if +they are not guided and shaped by a deep understanding of life's +fundamental nature and needs--in other words, if the poet is not +something of a scientist. And in the same way, the very greatest +discoveries of science seem to us like leaps of creative imagination; as +if the mind had completed nature, through some intuitive and sympathetic +understanding of what nature wished to be. + +The point about these higher forms of human activity is that they renew +and multiply life. We may say that if Jesus had never lived, others +would have embodied and set forth with equal poignancy the revolutionary +idea of the equality of all men as children of one common father. And +perhaps this is true; but we have no way of being sure that it is true, +and as we look back upon the last nineteen hundred years of human +history, we are unable to imagine just what the life of mankind during +those centuries would have been if Jesus had died when he was a baby. We +do not know what modern thought might have been without Kant, or what +modern music might have been without Beethoven. We are forced to admit +that if it had not been for the patient wisdom and persuasive kindness +of Lincoln, the Slave Power might have won its independence, and America +today might have been a military camp like Europe, and the lives and +thoughts of every one of us would have been different. + +Or take the activities of the poet. Many years ago the writer was asked +to name the men who had exercised the greatest influence upon him, and +after much thought he named three: Jesus, Hamlet and Shelley. And now +consider the significance of this reply. One of these people, Shelley, +was what we call a "real" person; that is, a man who actually lived and +walked upon the earth. Concerning Hamlet, it is believed there was once +a Prince of Denmark by that name, but the character who is known to us +as Hamlet is the creation of a poet's brain. As to the third figure, +Jesus, the authorities dispute. Some say that he was a man who actually +lived; others believe that he was God on earth; yet others, very +learned, maintain that he is a legendary name around which a number of +traditions have gathered. + +To me it does not make a particle of difference which of the three +possibilities happens to be true about Jesus. If he was God on earth, he +was God in human form, under human limitations, and in that sense we are +all gods on earth. And whether he really lived, or whether some poet +invented him, matters not a particle so far as concerns his effect upon +others. The emotions which moved him, the loves, the griefs, the high +resolves, existed in the soul of someone, whether his name were Jesus or +John; and these emotions have been recorded in such form that they +communicate themselves to us, they become a part of our souls, they make +us something different from what we were before we encountered them. + +In other words, the poet makes in his own soul a new life, and then +projects it into the world, and it becomes a force which makes over the +lives of millions of other people. If you read the vast mass of +criticism which has grown up about the figure of Hamlet, you learn that +Hamlet is the type of the "modern man." Shakespeare was able to divine +what the modern man would be; or perhaps we can go farther and say that +Shakespeare helped to make the modern man what he is; the modern man is +more of Hamlet, because he has taken Hamlet to his heart and pondered +over Hamlet's problem. Or take Don Quixote. No doubt the follies of the +"age of chivalry" would have died out of men's hearts in the end; but +how much sooner they died because of the laughter of Cervantes! Or take +"Les Miserables." Our prison system is not ideal by any means, but it is +far less cruel than it was half a century ago, and we owe this in part +to Victor Hugo. Every convict in the world is to some degree a happier +man because of this vision which was projected upon the world from the +soul of one great poet. No one can estimate the part which the writings +of Tolstoi have played in the present revolution in Russia, but this we +may say with certainty: there is not one man, woman or child in Russia +at the present moment who is quite the same as he would have been if +"Resurrection" had never been written. + +In discussing the highest faculties of man we have so far refrained from +using the word "genius." It is a word which has been cheapened by +misuse, but we are now in position to use it. The things which we have +just been considering are the phenomena of genius--and we can say this, +even though we may not know exactly what genius is. Perhaps it is, as +Frederic Myers asserts, a "subliminal uprush," the welling up into the +consciousness of some part of the content of the subconscious mind. Or +perhaps it is something of what man calls "divine." Or perhaps it is the +first dawning, the first hint of that super-race which will some day +replace mankind. Perhaps we are witnessing the same thing that happened +on the earth when glimmerings of reason first broke upon the mind of +some poor, bewildered ape. We cannot be sure; but this much we can say: +the man of genius represents the highest activity of the mind of which +we as yet have knowledge. He represents the spirit of man, fully +emancipated, fully conscious, and taking up the task of creation; taking +human life as raw material, and making it over into something more +subtle, more intense, more significant, more universal than it ever was +before, or ever would have been without the intervention of this new +God-man. + + + + +CHAPTER X + +MYSELF AND MY NEIGHBOR + + (Compares the new morality with the old, and discusses the relative + importance of our various duties.) + + +So now we may say that we know what are the great and important things +in life. Slowly and patiently, with infinite distress and waste and +failure, but yet inevitably, the life of man is being made over and +multiplied to infinity, by the power of the thinking mind, impelled by +the joy and thrill of the creative action, and guided by the sense of +responsibility, the instinct to serve, which we call conscience. To +develop these higher faculties is the task we have before us, and the +supreme act to which we dedicate ourselves. + +So now we are in position to define the word moral. Assuming that our +argument be accepted, that action is moral which tends to foster the +best and highest forms of life we know, and to aid them in developing +their highest powers; that is immoral which tends to destroy the best +life we know, or to hinder its rapid development. + +Let us now proceed to apply these tests to the practices of man; first +as an individual, and then as a social being. What are my duties to +myself, and what are my duties to the world about me? + +You will note that these questions differ somewhat from those of the old +morality. Jesus told us, first, that we should love the Lord our God, +and, second, that we should love our neighbor as ourself. Some would say +that modern thought has dismissed God from consideration; but I would +prefer to say that modern thought has decided that the place where we +encounter God most immediately is in our own miraculously expanding +consciousness. Our duty toward God is our duty to make of ourselves the +most perfect product of the Divine Incarnation that we can become. Our +duty to our neighbor is to help him to do the same. + +Of course, as we come to apply these formulas, we find that they overlap +and mingle inextricably; the two duties are really one duty looked at +from different points of view. We decide that we owe it to ourselves to +develop our best powers of thinking, and we discover that in so doing we +make ourselves better fitted to live as citizens, better equipped to +help our fellow men. We go out into our city to serve others by making +the city clean and decent, and we find that we have helped to save +ourselves from a pestilence. + +The most commonly accepted, or at any rate the most commonly preached, +of all formulas is the "golden rule," "Do unto others as you would have +them do unto you." This formula is good so far as it goes, but you note +that it leaves undetermined the all-important question, what _ought_ we +to want others to do unto us. If I am an untrained child, what I would +have others do unto me is to give me plenty of candy; therefore, under +the golden rule, my highest duty becomes to distribute free candy to the +world. The "golden rule" is obviously consistent with all forms of +self-indulgence, and with all forms of stagnation; it might result in a +civilization more static than China. + +Or let us take the formula which the German philosopher Kant worked out +as the final product of his thinking: "Act so that you would be willing +for your action to become a general rule of conduct." Here again is the +same problem. There are many possible general rules of conduct. Some +would prefer one, some others; and there is no possible way of escape +from the fact that before men can agree what to do, they must decide +what they wish to make of their lives. + +To the formula of Jesus, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself," the +answer is obvious enough: "Suppose my neighbor is not worthy of as much +love as myself?" To be sure, it is a perilous thing for me to have to +decide this question; nevertheless, it may be a fact that I am a great +inventor, and that my neighbor is a sexual pervert. There is, of course, +a sense in which I may love him, even so; I may love the deeper +possibilities of his nature, which religious ecstasy can appeal to and +arouse. But in spite of all ecstasies and all efforts, it may be that +his disease--physical, mental and moral--has progressed to such a point +that it is necessary to confine him, or to castrate him, or even to +asphyxiate him painlessly. To say that I must love such a man as myself +is, to say the least, to be vague. We can see how the indiscriminate +preaching of such a formula would open the flood-gates of sentimentality +and fraud. + +Modern thinking says: Thou shalt love the highest possibilities of life, +and thou shalt labor diligently to foster them; moreover, because life +is always growing, and new possibilities are forever dawning in the +human spirit, thou shalt keep an open mind and an inquiring temper, and +be ready at any time to begin life afresh. + +Such is the formula. It is not simple; and when we come to apply it, we +find that it constantly grows more complex. When we attempt to decide +our duty to ourselves, we find that we have in us a number of different +beings, each with separate and sometimes conflicting duties and needs. +We have in us the physical man and the economic man, and these clamor +for their rights, and must have at least a part of their rights, before +we can go on to be the intellectual man, the moral man, or the artistic +man. So our life becomes a series of compromises and adjustments between +a thousand conflicting desires and duties; between the different beings +which we might be, but can be only to a certain extent, and at certain +times. We shall see, as we come to investigate one field after another +of human activity, that we never have an absolute certainty, never an +absolute right, never an absolute duty; never can we shut our eyes, and +go blindly ahead upon one course of action, to the exclusion of every +other consideration! On the contrary, we sit in the seat of +self-determination as a highly trained and skillful engineer. We keep +our eyes upon a dozen different gauges; we press a lever here and touch +a regulator there; we decide that now is a time for speed, and now for +caution; and knowing all the time that the safety, not merely of +ourselves, but of many passengers, depends upon the decisions of each +moment. + + + + +CHAPTER XI + +THE MIND AND THE BODY + + (Discusses the interaction between physical and mental things, and + the possibility of freedom in a world of fixed causes.) + + +It is our plan, so far as possible, to discuss the problems of the mind +in one section of this book, and the problems of the body in another; +but just as we found that we could not separate our duties to ourself +from our duties to our neighbors, so we find that the mind and the body +are inextricably interwoven, and that whenever we probe deeply into one, +we discover the other. The interaction of the mind and the body is a +fascinating problem into which we must look for a moment, not because we +expect to solve it, but because it illuminates the whole subject. + +The human body is a machine. It takes in carbon and oxygen, and burns +them, and gives out carbon dioxide and other waste products, and +develops energy in proportion to the amount of carbon it consumes. This +machine has its elaborate apparatus of action and reaction, its sensory +organs where outside stimuli are received, its nerves like telegraph +wires to carry these impressions, its brain cells to store them and to +transform them into reactions. We know to some extent how these brain +cells work. We know what portions of the brain are devoted to this or +that activity. We know that if we stick a pin into a certain spot we +shall paralyze the left forefinger. We know that by injecting a certain +drug, or by breathing a certain gas, we can cause this or that sensation +or reaction, such as laughing or weeping or mania. We know what poisons +are generated in the system by anger, and what chemical changes take +place in a muscle that is tired. All this is part of a vast new science +which is called bio-chemistry, or the chemistry of life. + +Our bodies, therefore, are part of the material universe, and subject to +the laws or ways of being of this universe. The first of these laws that +we know is the law of causation. Every change in the universe has its +cause, and that in turn had another cause; this chain is never broken, +no matter how far we go, and the same causes universally produce the +same effects. If you see a ball move on a billiard table, you know that +the ball did not move itself; you know that something struck the ball or +tilted the table. You discover that the motion of the ball moves the air +around it, and the waves of that motion are spread through the room. +They strike the walls, and the motion is carried on through the walls, +and if we had instruments sensitive enough, we could feel the motion of +that billiard ball at the other side of the world, and a few million +years from now at the most remote of the stars. This is what is called +the law of the conservation of energy, and when we discover something +like radium which seems to violate that law by giving out unlimited +quantities of energy, we investigate and discover a new form of energy +locked up in the atom. In the disintegration of the atom we have a +source of power which, when we have learned to use it, will multiply +perhaps millions of times the powers we are now able to use on this +earth. But energy, no matter how many times it is transformed, and in +what strange ways it reappears, always remains, and is never destroyed, +and never created out of nothing. + +My friend the great physiologist once took me into his laboratory and +showed me a little aquarium in which some minute creatures were wiggling +about--young sea-urchins, if I remember. The physiologist took a bottle +containing some chemical, and dropped a single drop into the water, and +instantly all these little black creatures, which had been darting +aimlessly in every direction through the water, turned and swam all in +one direction, toward the light. They swam until they touched the walls +of the aquarium, and there they stuck, trying their best to swim +farther. "And now," said my friend, "that is what we call a 'tropism,' +and all life is a tropism. What you see in that aquarium means that some +day we shall know just what combination of chemicals causes a human +being to move this way or that, to do this thing or that. When +bio-chemistry has progressed sufficiently, we shall be able to make +human qualities, perhaps in the sperm, perhaps in the embryo, perhaps +day by day by means of diet or injection." + +Said I: "Some day, when bio-chemistry has progressed far enough, you +will know what combination of chemicals causes a man to vote the +Democratic or Republican ticket." + +"Why not?" answered my friend. (He has a sense of humor about all things +except this sacred bio-chemistry.) + +Said I: "When you have got to that stage, keep the secret carefully, and +we will fix up a scheme, and a few days before election we will release +some gas in our big cities, and sweep the country for the Socialist +ticket." + +But jesting aside: if the human body is a material thing, existing in +the material world and subject to causation, there must be material +reasons for the actions of human bodies, just the same as for the moving +of billiard balls. We hear the sound of a billiard ball striking the +cushion, and we are prepared to accept the idea that the thing we call +hearing in us is caused by the impinging of sound waves upon our +eardrums. And if we investigate human beings in the mass, we find every +reason to believe that they act according to laws, and that there are +material causes for their acts. If you get up and shout fire in a +theater, you know how the audience will behave. If you study statistics, +you can say that in any large city a certain fixed number of human +beings are going to commit suicide every month; you can even say that +more are going to commit suicide in the month of June than in any other +month. You can say that more people are going to die at two o'clock in +the morning than at any other hour. You know that certain changes in the +weather will cause all human beings to behave in the same way. You know +that an increase of prices or an increase of unemployment will cause a +certain additional number of men to commit crimes, and a certain +additional number of women to become prostitutes. You know that if a man +overeats, his thoughts will change their color; he will have what he +calls "the blues." I might cite a thousand other illustrations to prove +that human minds are subject to material laws, and therefore to +investigation by the bio-chemists. + +But now, stop a moment. Here you sit reading a book. Something in the +book pleases you, and you say, "Good!" Perhaps you slap your knee or +clench your fist. Now here is a motion of your hand, which stirs the air +about you, and which, according to the laws of energy, will spread its +effects to the other side of the world, and even to the farthest of the +stars. Or perhaps the book makes you angry, and you throw it down in +disgust; an entirely different motion, which will affect the other side +of the world and the farthest of the stars in an entirely different +way. The machine of the universe will be forever altered because of that +slapping of your knee or that throwing down of your book. + +And what was the cause of these things? So far as we can see, the +material cause was exactly the same in each case--the reading of certain +letters. Two human beings, sitting side by side and reading exactly the +same letters, might be affected in exactly opposite ways. It seems +hardly rational to maintain that the material difference of two pairs of +eyes, moving over exactly the same set of letters, could have resulted +in two such different motions of the hands. As a matter of fact, the +very same letters may affect the same person in different ways. The +composer, Edward MacDowell, once told me how on his birthday his pupils +sent him a gift, with a card containing some lines from the opera +"Rheingold," beginning, "O singe fort"--that is, "Oh, sing on." But the +composer happened, when glancing at the card, to think French instead of +German, and got the message, "Oh, powerful monkey!" This, of course, was +disconcerting to a famous piano performer, and his pupils, if they had +been watching his face, would have seen an unexpected reaction. It seems +manifest, does it not, that the cause of this difference of reaction was +not any difference of the letters, but purely a difference of _thought_? +So it appears that thoughts may change the material universe; they may +break the chain of causation, and interfere with material events. + +Compare the two things, a state of consciousness and say, a steam +shovel. They are entirely different, and so far as we can see, entirely +incompatible and unrelated. Can anyone imagine how a thought can turn +into a steam shovel, or a steam shovel into a thought? We can understand +how a steam shovel lifts a mass of earth out of the ground, and we can +understand how a human hand moves a lever which causes the shovel to +act; but we are unable to conceive how a state of mind--whether it be a +desire for pay, or an ideal of service, or a vision of the Panama +Canal--can so affect a steam shovel as to cause it to move. We can sit +and think motion at a billiard ball for a thousand years, and it does +not move; but when we think motion at our hand, it moves instantly, and +passes on the motion to the billiard ball or the steam shovel. When fire +touches our hand it sends some kind of vibration to the brain, and in +some inconceivable way that vibration is turned into a state of +consciousness called pain, and that is turned, "as quick as thought," +into another kind of motion, the jerking back of our hand. + +So it seems certain that consciousness really does "butt in" on the +chain of natural causation. And yet, just see in what position this +leaves the scientist who is investigating life! Imagine if you can, the +plight of a doctor who wanted to prescribe a diet for a sick person, if +he knew that every piece of chicken and every piece of fish were free to +decide of its own impulse whether or not it would be digested in the +human stomach. But the plight of this doctor would be nothing to the +plight of the chemist or the biologist or the engineer who was asked to +do his thinking and his planning in a world containing a billion and a +quarter human beings, each one a lawless agent, each one a source of new +and unforeseeable energies, each one acting as a "first cause," and +starting new chains of activity, tearing the universe to pieces +according to his own whims. What kind of a universe would that be? It +would simply be a chaos; there could be no thinking, there could be no +life in it; there could be no two things the same in it, and no laws of +any sort. + +So then we fall back into the hands of the "determinists," who assert +one unbreakable chain of natural causation, and regard the human body as +an automaton. We go back to the bio-chemist, who purposes some day to +ascertain for us just exactly what molecules of matter in just what +positions and combinations in the brain cells of William Shakespeare +caused him to perpetrate a mixed metaphor. We go back to the belief that +human beings act as they must act, because the clock of life, wound up +and started, must move in such and such a fashion. + +But now, let us see what are the implications of that theory! Here am I +writing a book, appealing to men to act in certain ways. Of course, I +know that not all will follow my advice. Some will be foolish--or what +seems to me foolish. Others will be weak, and will resolve to act in +certain ways, and then go and act in other ways. But some will be just; +some will be free; some will use their brains--because, you see, I am +convinced that they _can_ use their brains! I am convinced that ideas +will affect and stir them, in complete defiance of the bio-chemist, who +tells me that they act that way because of certain chemicals in their +brain cells, and that I write my book because of other chemicals, and +that my idea that I am writing the book because I want to write it is a +delusion, and that the whole thing is happening just so because the +universe was wound up that way. + +Now, this an unsolved problem, and I have no solution to offer. What I +have set forth is in substance one of the four "antinomies" of Kant, and +you can see for yourself how it is possible to prove either side, and +impossible to be sure of either. Perhaps there is really a duality in +life. Perhaps there are two aspects of the universe, the material and +the spiritual, and perhaps they do not really interact as they seem to, +but both are guided and determined by some higher reality of life of +which we know nothing. In that case there would really be a chemical +equivalent for every thought, and there would be a trace of +consciousness for every material atom in the universe. Maybe the +theologians are right, and in the universal consciousness of God the +whole future exists predetermined. Maybe to God there is no such thing +as time; the past, the present, and the future are all alike to Him. + +There is nothing more painful to the human mind than to have to confess +its own impotence. Yet I can see no escape from the dilemma we are here +facing. There is not a man alive who does not assume the freedom of the +will, who does not show in all his acts that he agrees with old Dr. +Samuel Johnson: "We know we are free and there's an end on't." Without a +belief in freedom we cannot get beyond the animal, we cannot become the +masters of our own souls. And yet, the man who swallows that idea whole, +and goes out into the world and preaches personal morality to the +neglect of the fundamental economic facts, the facts of the body in its +relationship to all other bodies--we know what happens to that man; he +becomes a shouting fool. Unless he is literally a fool, or a knave, he +quickly discovers his own futility, and proceeds to use his common +sense, in spite of all his theories. "Come to Jesus!" cried William +Booth, and he went out in the streets of London to save souls with a +bass drum; but presently, in day by day contact with the degradation of +the London slums, he realized that he could not save souls so long as +those souls were dwelling in starved and lousy bodies. So William Booth +with his Salvation Army took to starting night shelters and cast-off +clothing bureaus! + +And of exactly the same sort is the bewilderment which falls to the lot +of the scientist who is honest and willing to face the facts. The +bio-chemist with his test tubes and his microscopes and his complex +apparatus of research sits himself down and accumulates a mass of +information about the human body. He investigates the diseases of the +body and learns in detail just how these diseases spread and sometimes +how they are caused; he can present you with a diagnosis, showing the +exact stage to which the degeneration of a certain organ has proceeded, +and perhaps he can suggest to you a change of diet or some drug which +will, for a time at least, check the process of the breakdown. But in +other cases he will be perfectly helpless; he will be, as it were, +buried under the mass of detail which he has accumulated; he will find +the vital energy depressed, and he will not know any way to renew it. +But along will come some mental specialist, who in a half hour's talk +with the patient, by a simple change in the patient's _ideas_, will +completely make over the patient's life, and set going a new vital +process which will restore the body to its former health. A religious +enthusiast may do this, a psychotherapist may do it, a moral genius may +do it; and the physician with all his learning will find himself like a +man on the outside of a house, peering in through the windows and trying +in vain to find out something about the life of the family and its +guests. + +This is humiliating to the chemist and the medical man, but they have to +face it, because it is a fact. In the seat of authority over the human +body there sits a higher being which, without any religious +implications, we may call the soul; or, if it is impossible to get away +from the religious implication of that word, we will call it the +consciousness, or the personality. This master of the house of life is +in many ways dependent upon the house. If the furnace goes out he +freezes, and if the house takes fire and burns up--well, he disappears +and leaves no address. But in other ways the master of the house is +really master, and is a worker of miracles. He does things which we do +not at all understand, and cannot yet even foresee, but which often +completely make the house over. + +William James, a scientist of real authority, has a wonderful essay, +"The Powers of Men," in which he sets forth the fact that human beings +as a general rule make use of only a small portion of the energies which +dwell in their beings, and that one of our problems is to find the ways +by which we can draw upon stores of hidden energy which we have within +us. Also, in a fascinating book, "Varieties of the Religious +Experience," James has endeavored to study and analyze the phenomena +which hitherto the physician and the biologist have been disposed to +ridicule and neglect. But unless I am mistaken, every scientist in the +end will be forced to come back to the central fact, that life is a +unity, and that the heart of it is the spirit; that what we call the +will is not an accident, not a delusion, not some by-product of nature, +but is the very secret of life; and that behind it is a vast ocean of +power, which now and then sweeps away all dykes, and floods into the +human consciousness. + +The writer of this book is now a patient and plodding teacher of a +certain economic doctrine, a preacher of what he might call +anti-parasitism. He has come to the conclusion that the habit of men to +enslave their fellows and exploit them and draw their substance from +them without return--that this habit is destructive to all civilization, +and is incompatible with any of the higher forms of life, intellectual, +moral or artistic. He has come to the conclusion that there is no use +attempting to build a structure of social life until there is a sound +foundation; in other words, until the capitalist system has been +replaced by cooperation. But in his youth he was, or thought he was, a +poet, and touched upon that strange and wonderful thing which we call +genius. He saw his own consciousness, as it were a leaf driven before a +mighty tempest of spiritual energy. And he believes that this experience +was no delusion, but was a revelation of the hidden mysteries of being. +He still has memories of this startling experience, still hints of it in +his consciousness; something still leaps in his memory, like a +race-horse, or like the war-horse of Revelations, which "scenteth the +battle afar off, the thunder of the captains and the shouting." Because +of these things he can never accept any philosophy which shackles the +human spirit, he will never in his thought attempt to set bounds to the +possibilities of human life. The very heart of life beats in us, the +wonder of it and the glory of it swells like a tide behind us. New +universes are born in us, or, if you prefer, they are made by us; and +the process is one of endless joy, of rapture beyond anything that the +average man can at present imagine, or that any instruments invented by +science can weigh or measure. + + + + +CHAPTER XII + +THE MIND OF THE BODY + + (Discusses the subconscious mind, what it is, what it does to the + body, and how it can be controlled and made use of by the + intelligence.) + + +The importance of the mind in matters of health becomes clearer when we +understand that what we commonly call our minds--the mental states which +confront us day by day in our consciousness--are really but a small +portion of our total mind. In addition to this conscious mind there is +an enormous mass of our personality which is like a storehouse attached +to our dwelling, a place to which we do not often go, but to which we +can go in case of need. This storehouse is our memory, the things we +know and can recall at will. And then there is another, still vaster +storehouse--no one has ever measured or guessed the size of it--which +apparently contains everything that we have ever known, perhaps also +everything that our ancestors have known. A common simile for the human +mind is that of an iceberg; a certain portion of it appears above the +surface of the sea, but there is seven times as much of it floating out +of sight under the water. + +This subconscious mind seems to be the portion most closely united with +the body. It has its seat in the back parts of the brain, in the spinal +cord and the greater nervous ganglia, such as the solar plexus. It is +the portion of our mind which controls the activities of our body, all +those miraculous things which went on before we first opened our eyes to +the light, and which go on while we sleep, and never cease until we die. +When we cut our finger and admit foreign germs to our blood, some +mysterious power causes millions of our blood corpuscles to be rushed to +this spot, to destroy and devour the invading enemy. We do not know how +this is done, but it is an intelligent act, measured and precisely +regulated, as much so as a railroad time-table. When the supply of +nourishment in the body becomes low, something issues a notice by way of +our stomach, which we call hunger; when we take food into the stomach, +something pours out the gastric juice to digest it; when this digested +food is prepared and taken up in the blood stream, something decides +what portion of it shall be turned into muscle, what into brain cells, +what into hair, what into finger nails. Sometimes, of course, mistakes +are made and we have diseases. But for the most part all this infinitely +intricate process goes on day and night without a hitch, and it is all +the work of what we might call "the mind of the body." + +And just as our material bodies are the product of an age-long process +of development repeated in embryo by every individual, so is this mental +life a product of long development, and carries memories of this far-off +process. In our instincts there dwells all the past, not merely of the +human race, but of all life, and if we should ever succeed in completely +probing the subconscious mind and bringing it into our consciousness, it +would be the same as if we were free to ramble about in all the past. +Huxley set forth the fact that all the history of evolution is told in a +piece of chalk; and we probably do not exaggerate in saying that all the +history of the universe is in the subconscious mind of every human +being. When the partridge which has just come out of the egg sees the +shadow of the hawk flit by and crouches motionless as a leaf, the +partridge is not acting upon any knowledge which it has acquired in the +few minutes since it was hatched. It is acting upon a knowledge +impressed upon its subconscious mind by the experience of millions of +partridges, perhaps for tens of thousands of years. When the physician +lifts the newly born infant by its ankle and spanks it to make it cry, +the physician is using his conscious reason, because he has learned from +previous experience, or has been taught in the schools that it is +necessary for the child's breathing apparatus to be instantly cleared. +But when the child responds to the spanking with a yell, it is not moved +by reasoned indignation at an undeserved injury; it is following an +automatic reaction, as a result of the experience of infants in the +stone age, experience which in some obscure way has been registered and +stored in the infant cerebellum. + +Science is now groping its way through this underworld of thought. +Obviously we should have here a most powerful means of influencing the +body, if by any chance we could control it. We are continually seeking +in medical and surgical ways to stimulate or to retard activities of the +body, which are controlled entirely by this subconscious mind. If we are +suffering intense pain in a joint, we put on a mustard plaster, what we +call a counter-irritant, to trouble the skin and draw the congested +blood away from the place of the pain. On the other hand, we may +stimulate the functions of the intestines by the application of hot +fomentations, to bring the blood more actively to that region. But if by +any means we could make clear our wishes to the subconscious mind, we +should be dealing with headquarters, and should get quicker and more +permanent results. + +Can we by any possibility do this? To begin with, let me tell you of a +simple experiment that I have witnessed. I once knew a man who had +learned to control the circulation of his blood by his conscious will. I +have seen him lay his two hands on the table, both of the same color, +and without moving the hands, cause one hand to turn red and the other +to turn pale. And, obviously, so far as this man is concerned, the +problem of counter-irritants has been solved. He is a mental mustard +plaster. + +And what was done by this man's own will can be done to others in many +ways. The most obvious is a device which we call hypnotism. This is a +kind of sleep which affects only the conscious control of the body, but +leaves all the senses awake. In this hypnotic sleep or "trance" we +discover that the subconscious mind is a good deal like the Henry Dubb +of the Socialist cartoons; it is faithful and persistent, very strong in +its own limited field, but comically credulous, willing to believe +anything that is told it, and to take orders from any one who climbs +into the seat of authority. You have perhaps attended one of the +exhibitions which traveling hypnotists are accustomed to give in country +villages. You have seen some bumpkin brought upon the stage and +hypnotized, and told that he is in the water and must swim for his life, +or that he is in the midst of a hornets' nest, or that his trousers are +torn in the seat--any comical thing that will cause an audience to howl +with laughter. + +These facts were first discovered nearly a hundred and fifty years ago +by a French doctor named Mesmer. He was a good deal of a charlatan, and +would not reveal his secrets, and probably the scientific men of that +time were glad to despise him, because what he did was so new and +strange. There is a certain type of scientific mind which sits aloft on +a throne with a framed diploma above its head, and says that what it +knows is science and what it does not know is nonsense. And so +"mesmerism" was left for the quacks and traveling showmen. But half a +century later a French physician named Liebault took up this method of +hypnotism, without all the fakery that had been attached to it. He +experimented and discovered that he could cure not merely phobias and +manias, fixed ideas, hysterias and melancholias; he could cure definite +physical diseases of the physical body, such as headache, rheumatism, +and hemorrhage. Later on two other physicians, Janet and Charcot, +developed definite schools of "psychotherapy." They rejected hypnotism +as in most cases too dangerous, but used a milder form which is known as +"hypnoidization." You would be surprised to know how many ailments which +baffle the skill of medical men and surgeons yield completely to a +single brief treatment by such a mental specialist. + +All that is necessary is some method to tap the subconscious mind. In +many cases the subconsciousness knows what is the matter, and will tell +at once--a secret that is completely hidden from the consciousness. For +example, a man's hands shake; they have been shaking for years, and he +has no idea why, but his subconscious mind explains that they first +began to shake with grief over the death of his wife; also, the +subconscious mind meekly and instantly accepts the suggestion that the +time for grief is past, and that the hands will never shake again. + +Or here is a woman who has become convinced that worms are crawling all +over her. Everything that touches her becomes a worm, even the wrinkles +in her dress are worms, and she is wild with nervousness, and of course +is on the way to the lunatic asylum. She is hypnotized and sees the +operator catching these worms one by one and killing them. She is told +that he has killed the last, but she insists, "No, there is one more." +The operator clutches that one, and she is perfectly satisfied, and +completely cured. Her husband writes, expressing his relief that he no +longer has to "sleep every night in a fish pond." This instance with +many others is told by Professor Quackenbos in his book, "Hypnotic +Therapeutics." + +Among the most powerful means to influence the subconscious personality +is religious excitement. Religion has come down to us from ancient +times, and its fears and ecstasies are a part of our instinctive +endowment. Those who can sway religious emotions can cure disease, not +merely fixed ideas, but many diseases which appear to be entirely +physical, but which psycho-analysis reveals to be hysterical in nature. +Of course these religious persons who heal by laying on of hands or by +purely mental means deny indignantly that they are using hypnotism or +anything like it. I am aware that I shall bring upon myself a flood of +letters from Christian Scientists if I identify their methods of curing +with "animal magnetism" and "manipulation," and other devices of the +devil which they repudiate. All I can say is that their miracles are +brought about by affecting the subconscious mind; there is no other way +to bring them about, and for my part I cannot see that it makes a great +difference whether the subconscious mind is affected by a hand laid on +the forehead, or by a hand waved in the air, or by an incantation +pronounced, or by a prayer thought in silence. If you can persuade the +subconscious mind that God is operating upon it, that God is omnipotent +and is directing this particular healing, that is the most powerful +suggestion imaginable, and is the basis of many cures. But if in order +to achieve this, it is necessary for me to persuade myself that I can +find some meaning in the metaphysical moonshine of Mother Eddy--why, +then, I am very sorry, but I really prefer to remain sick. + +But such is not the case. You do not have to believe anything that is +not true; you simply have to understand the machinery of the +subconscious, and how to operate it. We are only beginning to acquire +that knowledge, and we need an open mind, free both from the dogmatism +of the medical men and the fanaticism of the "faith curists." A few +years ago in London I met a number of people who were experimenting in +an entirely open-minded way with mental healing, and I was interested in +their ideas. I happened to be traveling on the Continent, and on the +train my wife was seized by a very dreadful headache. She was lying with +her head in my lap, suffering acutely, and I thought I would try an +experiment, so I put my hand upon her forehead, without telling her what +I was doing, and concentrated my attention with the greatest possible +intensity upon her headache. I had an idea of the cause of it; I +understood that headaches are caused by the irritation of the sensory +nerves of the brain by fatigue poisons, or other waste matter which the +blood has not been able to eliminate. I formed in my mind a vivid +picture of what the blood would have to do to relieve that headache, and +I concentrated my mental energies upon the command to her subconscious +mind that it should perform these particular functions. In a few +minutes my wife sat up with a look of great surprise on her face and +said, "Why, my headache is gone! It went all at once!" + +That, of course, might have been a coincidence; but I tried the +experiment many times, and it happened over and over. On another +occasion I was able to cure the pain of an ulcerated tooth; I was able +to cure it half a dozen times, but never permanently, it always +returned, and finally the tooth had to come out. My wife experimented +with me in the same way, and found that she was able to cure an attack +of dyspepsia; but, curiously enough, she at once gave herself a case of +dyspepsia--something she had never known in her life before. So now I +will not allow her to experiment with me, and she will not allow me to +experiment with her! But we are quite sure that people with psychic +gifts can definitely affect the subconscious mind of others by purely +mental means. We are prepared to believe in the miracles of the New +Testament, and in the wonders of Lourdes, as well as in the healings of +the Christian Scientists and the New Thoughters, which cannot be +disputed by any one who is willing to take the trouble to investigate. +We can face these facts without losing our reason, without ceasing to +believe that everything in life has a cause, and that we can find out +this cause if we investigate thoroughly. + + + + +CHAPTER XIII + +EXPLORING THE SUBCONSCIOUS + + (Discusses automatic writing, the analysis of dreams, and other + methods by which a whole new universe of life has been brought to + human knowledge.) + + +One of the most common methods of exploring the subconscious mind is the +method of automatic writing. I have never tried this myself, but tens of +thousands of people are sitting every night with a "ouija" in front of +them, holding a pencil on a piece of paper and letting their +subconscious minds write what they please. Most of them are hoping to +get messages from the dead--a problem which we shall discuss in the next +chapter. Suffice it for the moment to say that automatic writing and +table rapping and other devices of mediumship have opened up to us a +vast mass of subconscious mentality. A part of the scientific world +still takes a contemptuous attitude and calls this all humbug, but many +of our greatest scientists have been persuaded to investigate, and have +become convinced that in this mass of subconsciousness there is mingled, +not merely the mind of the medium, but the minds of all those present, +and possibly other minds as well. For my part, I do not see how any one +can study disinterestedly the proceedings of the Society for Psychical +Research and not become convinced that telepathy at least is one of the +powers of the subconscious mind. + +Telepathy is what is popularly known as "thought transmission." Every +one must know people who are what is called "psychic," and will know +what is happening to some friend in another part of the world, or will +go upstairs because they "sense" that some one wants them, or will go to +the door because they "have a hunch" that some one is coming. And maybe +these things are only chance, but you will be unscientific if you do not +take the trouble to read and learn what modern investigators have +brought out on such subjects. + +This much is certain, and is denied by no competent investigator: +whatever has been in your mind is there still, and it is possible to +find a way of tapping the buried memory. An old woman, delirious with +fever, begins to babble in a strange language, and it is discovered that +she is talking ancient Hebrew. The woman is entirely illiterate, and her +conscious memory knows no language but her own, her conscious mind has +no ideas beyond those of her domestic life and the gossip of the +village. But investigation is made, and it is discovered that when this +woman was a girl, she worked in the home of a Hebrew scholar, and heard +him reading aloud. She did not understand a word of what she heard, and +was not consciously listening to it; nevertheless, every syllable of it +had been stored away forever by her subconscious mind. Innumerable cases +of this sort have been established; and, as a matter of fact, we might +have been prepared for such discoveries by the memory-feats of the +conscious mind. It is well known that Mozart, when a child, could listen +to a new opera, and go home and play it over note for note. At present +there is a child in America, giving exhibitions in public, carrying on +thirty games of chess at the same time. There have been others who do +sums of mental arithmetic, such as multiplying thirty-two figures by +thirty-two figures, or reciting the Bible backwards. + +All this seems incredible; and yet there is something still more +incredible. Suppose that these same powers, which are stored in our +subconscious minds, were stored also in the minds of animals! A few +years ago Maurice Maeterlinck published a book, "The Unknown Guest," in +the course of which he tells about his experiments with the so-called +Elberfeld horses: two animals which had been trained for years by their +owner to give signals by moving their forefeet, and which apparently +could count and divide and multiply large sums, and extract square and +cube root, and spell out names, and recognize sounds, scents and colors, +and read time from the face of a watch. Of course, it is easy to say +that this is absurd, that the horses must have got some signals from +their trainer; but, as it happened, they would do their work in the +absence of their trainer; they would do it in the dark, or with a sack +over their heads, and the best scientific minds of Germany were unable +to suggest any test conditions which could not be met. There have been +many gigantic frauds in the world, and this may have been one of them; +on the other hand, there have been many new discoveries, and for my part +I will finish exploring the miracles of the subconscious mind of man, +before I presume to say that anything is impossible in the subconscious +mind of a horse or a dog. Also I will wait for some learned person to +explain to me how the subconscious minds of horses and dogs know enough +to build and repair their bones and teeth, so cleverly that modern +architectural and engineering science could teach them nothing. I ask, +also, if it is possible to find a region in the subconsciousness which +is common to two people, why is it absurd to suggest that there might be +a region common to a man and a horse? Why is this any more absurd than +that they should eat the same food and breathe the same air and feel the +same affection and be frightened at the same dangers? + +The only persons who will be dogmatic about such subjects are the +persons who are ignorant. Those who take the trouble to investigate, +discover more wonderful things every day, and they realize that we have +here a whole universe of knowledge, to which we have as yet barely +opened the doors. Consider, for example, the facts which we are +acquiring on the subject of personality and what it means. You would +say, perhaps, that if there is anything you know positively, it is that +you are one person, and have never been anybody else, and that your body +belongs to you, and that nobody else ever has used or ever can use it. +But what would you say if I told you that tomorrow "you" might cease to +be, and somebody else might be in possession of your body, walking it +around and wearing its clothes and spending its money? What if I were to +tell you that there might be in "you," or in your body, half a dozen +different personalities which you have never known or dreamed of, and +that tomorrow there might break out a war between them and "you," as to +which of the half dozen people should hear with your ears and speak with +your tongue and walk about with your clothes on? Unless you are familiar +with the literature of multiple personality, you would surely say that +this was unbelievable--quite as much so as a mathematical horse! + +Let us begin with the case of the Reverend Ansel Bourne, who was many +years ago a perfectly respectable clergyman in a Rhode Island town. One +day he disappeared, and his family did not hear of him. A year or two +later there was a store-keeper in a town in Pennsylvania, who suddenly +came to himself as the Reverend Ansel Bourne, not knowing what he had +been in the meantime, or how he came to be keeping a store. Under +hypnotism it developed that he had in him two personalities, and his +trance personality recollected all that had been happening in the +meantime and told about it freely. + +Or take the still more fascinating case of the young lady who is known +in the literature of psychotherapy as Miss Beauchamp. Her story is told +in a book, "The Dissociation of a Personality," by Dr. Morton Prince of +Boston. Some thirty years ago Miss Beauchamp, a very conscientious and +dignified young lady, became nervous and ill, and took to doing strange +things, which were a source of shame and humiliation to her. Under +hypnotism it was discovered to be a case of multiple personality. The +other personality, who finally gave herself the name of Sally, was +entirely different in character from Miss Beauchamp, being mischievous, +vain, and primitive as a child. She conceived an intense dislike for +Miss Beauchamp, whom she called by abusive names; at times when she +could get possession of Miss Beauchamp's body, she delighted in playing +humiliating tricks upon her enemy, spending her money, running her into +debt, breaking her engagements, disgracing her before her friends. Sally +was always well and Miss Beauchamp was always ill, and Sally would take +the body, for which they fought for possession, and take it for long and +exhausting walks, and leave it cold and miserable, lost and penniless, +in the possession of Miss Beauchamp! And of course this made Miss +Beauchamp more and more a wreck, and Sally took possession of more and +more of her time. Sally knew everything that Miss Beauchamp did and +thought, but Miss Beauchamp did not know about Sally. She only knew that +there were gaps in her life, during which she did things she could not +explain. And because she did not want her friends to think her insane, +she would try to hide this dreadful condition of affairs; but Sally +would spoil her plans by writing letters to her friends, and also by +writing insulting letters for Miss Beauchamp to find when she took +possession again. + +Then one day, after several years of treatment, there appeared yet +another personality, who knew nothing about Miss Beauchamp or Sally +either, and only knew what Miss Beauchamp had known up to some years +before. Miss Beauchamp had a college education, and wrote and spoke +French; Sally knew no French, and tried in vain to learn it; the new +personality did not have a college education at all. Nevertheless, +after long experiment, the story of which is as fascinating as any novel +you ever read, Dr. Prince discovered that this was the real Miss +Beauchamp; the others were "split off" personalities. He traced the +cause to a severe mental shock, and succeeded in the end in combining +the first Miss Beauchamp with the last, and in suppressing the obstinate +and wanton Sally. As you read this story, you watch him mentally +murdering a human being; "Sally" clamors pitifully for life, but he +condemns her to death, and relentlessly executes his sentence. It is a +"movie" thriller with a happy ending, and I should think it would make +disconcerting reading to persons who believe that each of us is one +immortal soul, or "has" one immortal soul, and is responsible for it to +a personal God. + +There is never any end to the problems of these multiple personalities, +and each case is a test of the judgment and ingenuity of the specialist. +He will try to make one personality "stick," and will fail, and will +have to accept another, or a combination of two. In one case, he found +that he could not get the right personality to "stick" except under +hypnosis, so he decided to leave the man in a mild state of trance, and +the new personality lived all the rest of its life in that condition. If +you wish to know more about this subject you can find books in any +well-equipped library. I mention one, "The Riddle of Personality," by H. +Addington Bruce, because it contains in the appendix an excellent list +of the literature of the subconscious in all its many aspects. + +There is another, and most fascinating method of exploring this +underworld of the mind, and that is the study of dreams. Some fifteen +years ago a psychotherapist in New York told me about the discoveries of +a physician in Vienna, and gave me some pamphlets, written in very +difficult and technical German. Since then this Professor Freud has been +translated, and has become a fad, and the absurdities of his followers +make one a little apologetic for him. But we do not give up Jesus +because of the torturers and bigots who call themselves Christians, and +in the same way we have no right to blame Freud for all the absurdities +of the psychoanalysts. + +Probably there never was a time in human history when there were not +people who interpreted dreams, and you can still buy "dream books" for +twenty-five cents, and learn that a white horse means that you are going +to get a letter from your sweetheart tomorrow; then you can buy another +dream book, telling you that a white horse means there is going to be a +death in your family within the year. Naturally this prejudices thinking +people against dream analysis; yet, dreams are facts, and every fact has +its cause, and if you dream about a white horse, there must assuredly be +some reason for your dreaming this particular thing. Of course we know +that if you eat mince-pie and welsh-rabbit at midnight, you will dream +about something terrible; but will it be snakes, or will it be a +railroad wreck, or will it be white horses trampling over you? +Obviously, it may be a million different unpleasant things; and what is +it that picks out this or that from the infinite store of your memory, +and brings it into the region of half-consciousness which we call the +dream? + +Professor Freud's discovery is in brief that the dream is a +wish-fulfillment. Our instincts present to our consciousness a great +mass of impulses and desires, and among these the consciousness selects +what it pleases, and represses and refuses to recognize or to act upon +the others. But maybe these decisions are not altogether satisfactory to +the subconsciousness. The mind of the body is in rebellion against the +mind--shall we say of reason, or shall we say of society? The mind of +society, otherwise known as the moral law, says that you shall be a good +little boy, and shall go to school and learn what you are told, and on +Sunday go to church and sit very still through a long sermon; whereas, +the body of a boy would rather be a savage, hunting birds' nests and +scalping enemies and exploring magic caves full of precious jewels. So +the subconsciousness of the boy, balked and miserable, awaits its time, +and finds its satisfaction when the boy is asleep and his moral censor +has relaxed its control. + +This dream mind is not a logical and orderly thing like the conscious +mind; it is not business-like and civilized, it does not deal in +abstractions. It is far more interested in things than in words; it does +not present us with formulas, but with pictures, and with stories of +weird and wonderful happenings. It is like the mind of the race, which +we study in legends and religions. It does not tell us that the sun is a +mass of incandescent hydrogen gas, so and so many miles in diameter; it +tells us that the sun is a cosmic hero who slays the black dragon of +night. So the mind of our body presents us with innumerable pictures and +symbols, exactly such as we find in poetry. There may be, and frequently +is, dispute as to just what a poet meant by this or that particular +image, but if we read all the work of any particular poet, we get a +certain impression of that poet's individuality. If he is always talking +about the perfume of women's hair and the gleam of the white flesh of +nymphs in the thickets, we are not left in doubt as to what is wrong +with this poet. + +And just so, when the expert sets to work to examine all the dreams that +any one person can remember, day after day, sooner or later the expert +observes that these dreams hover continually about one particular +subject; and by questioning the person, he can find out what is the +secret which is troubling the person, perhaps without the person himself +being aware of it. Of course there are many people who like nothing so +much as to talk about themselves; and many are spending their time and +their money on the latest fad of being "psyched," who would, in any +properly organized world, be put to work at hoeing weeds or washing +their own clothes. Nevertheless, it is a fact that there are real mental +disorders in the world, and innumerable honest and earnest people who +have something the matter with them which they do not understand. Here +is one way by which the conscientious investigator can find out what the +trouble is, and make it clear to them, and by establishing harmony +between their conscious and their subconscious minds, can many times put +them in the way of health and happiness. + +Through psychoanalysis we are enabled to understand the "split" +personality and its cause. We discover that almost everyone has more or +less rudimentary forms of multiple personality hidden within him; made +out of desires and traits which he does not like, or which the world +forces him to drive into the deeps of his being. These may be evil +impulses, of sex or violence; they may be the most noble altruisms, or +artistic yearnings, ridiculous things in a world of "hustle." A quite +normal man or woman may keep a separate self, apart from the world, +living a Jekyll life of business propriety and a Hyde life of religious +or musical ecstasy. Or again, the repressed impulses may integrate +themselves in the unconscious, and you may have genius or lunacy or +both--"great wits to madness near allied." The modern knowledge on such +dark mysteries you may find in Hart's "The Psychology of Insanity." + + + + +CHAPTER XIV + +THE PROBLEM OF IMMORTALITY + + (Discusses the survival of personality from the moral point of + view: that is, have we any claim upon life, entitling us to live + forever?) + + +As we explore the deeps of the subconsciousness, our own and other +people's, we find ourselves confronting the strange question: Is it all +our own mind, and that of other living people, or are we by any chance +dealing with the minds of those who are dead? A great many earnest +people, and some very learned people, are fully convinced that the +latter is the case, and we have now to consider their arguments. + +When I was a little boy I used to read and hear ghost stories, and would +shudder over them; but I was given to understand that all this was just +imagination, I must not take ghosts seriously, any more than fairies or +dragons or nymphs or satyrs. For an educated person to take ghosts +seriously--well, such a person would be almost as comical as that +supremely comical person, the flying-machine man. Would you believe it, +in those days there actually were people who believed they could learn +to fly in the air, and spent their time manufacturing machines for this +purpose! There was a scientist in Washington who had this "bug," and +built himself a machine and started to fly, and fell into the Potomac +river. We all laughed at him--we laughed so long and so loud that we +killed the poor man; and then, a few years later, somebody took that +machine of Professor Langley's and actually did fly with it! But that +was after I had grown up a bit more, and was not quite so ready to laugh +at an idea because it was new. + +I remember vividly my first meeting with a man who believed in ghosts. +He was a Unitarian clergyman, the Reverend Minot J. Savage of New York. +I was sixteen years old, and just breaking out of my theological shell, +and Doctor Savage helped to pry me loose. He was a grave and kindly man, +of great learning and intelligence, and I remember vividly my +consternation when one day he told me--oh, yes, he had seen many ghosts, +he was accustomed to talk with ghosts every now and then. There was no +doubt whatever that ghosts existed! + +He told me many stories. I remember one so well that I do not have to go +back to his books to look up the details. It was in the days before the +Atlantic cable, and he had a friend who took a steamer to England. One +night Doctor Savage was awakened and found the ghost of his friend +standing by his bedside. The ship had gone down off the Irish coast, so +the ghost declared, but the friend did not want Doctor Savage to think +that he had suffered from the pangs of drowning; he had been struck on +the left side of the head by a beam of the ship and had been killed +instantly. Doctor Savage wrote down these circumstances and had them +witnessed by a number of people, and two or three weeks later he +received word that the body of his friend had been found on the Irish +coast, with the left side of the head crushed in. + +So then, of course, I studied the subject of ghosts. I have studied it +off and on ever since, and have read most of the important new +discoveries and arguments of the psychic researchers. To begin with, I +will mention the contents of two large volumes, Gurney's "Phantasms of +the Living." In this book are narrated many hundreds of cases, of which +Doctor Savage's story is a type. It appears that persons at the moment +of death, or in times of great mental stress, do somehow have the power +to communicate with other people, even at the other side of the world. A +few such cases might be attributed to coincidence or to fraud, but when +you have so many cases, attested in minute detail by so many hundreds of +otherwise honest people, you are not being scientific but simply stupid +if you dismiss the whole subject with contempt. + +Gurney discusses the phenomenon and its probable causes. We know, of +course, that hallucinations are among the most common of psychic +phenomenon. Your subconscious mind can be caused to see and hear and +feel anything; likewise it has power to cause you to see and hear and +feel anything. In practically all cases of multiple personality some of +the split-off personalities can cause the others to see and hear and +feel. And the consciousness, you must understand, takes these things to +be just as real as real things; there is no way you can tell an +hallucination from reality--except to ask other people about it. And if +we admit the idea of telepathy, we may say that phantasms are +hallucinations caused by this means; that is, the subconscious mind of +your wife or your mother or your friend who is ill or dying, transmits +to your subconscious mind some vivid impression, which causes your own +subconscious mind to present to your consciousness a perfect image of +that person, walking and talking with you, and your consciousness has no +way of telling but that the image is real. + +So much for phantasms of the living. But are there any phantasms of the +dead? Are there any cases in which the time of the appearance can be +proven to be subsequent to the time of death? Even this would not prove +survival, of course; it is perfectly possible that the telepathic +impulse might be delayed in our own minds, it might not flash into +consciousness until our own state of mind made it possible. Can we say +that there are cases in which the facts communicated are such as to +convince us that the person was already dead, and was telling us +something as a dead person and not as a living one? + +Before we go into this question, let us clear the ground for the subject +by discussing the survival of personality from a more general +standpoint. What is it that we want to prove? What are the probabilities +of its being true? What would be the consequences of its not being true? +Have we any grounds, other than those of psychic research, for thinking +that it is true, or that it may be true, or that it ought to be true? +What, so to speak, are the morals of the doctrine of immortality? + +Well, to begin with, the survival of the soul after death and forever is +one of the principal doctrines of the Christian religion. Many devout +Christians will read this book, and I will seem to them blasphemous when +I say that this argument does not concern me. I count myself one of the +lovers and friends of Jesus, I am presumptuous enough to believe that if +he were on earth, I would understand him and get along with him +excellently; but I do not know any reason why I should believe this, +that, or the other doctrine about life because any religious sect, +founded upon the name of Jesus, commands me so to believe. I see no more +reason for adopting the idea of heaven because it is a Christian idea +than I see for adopting the idea of reincarnation because it is a +precious and holy idea to hundreds of millions of Buddhists. I have some +very good friends who are Theosophists, and are quite convinced of this +idea of reincarnation; that is, that the soul comes back into life over +and over again in many different bodies, thus completing itself and +renewing itself and expiating its sins. My Theosophist friends have a +most elaborate and complicated body of what they consider to be +knowledge on this subject; yet I have to take the liberty of saying that +I cannot see that it has any relation to reality. It seems to me as +completely unproven as any other fairy story, or myth, or legend--for +example, the seven infernos of Dante, and the elaborate and complicated +torments that are suffered there. + +But, it will be argued, Jesus rose from the dead, and thus proved the +immortality of the soul. Now, in the first place, there are many learned +investigators who consider there is insufficient evidence for believing +that Jesus ever lived; and certainly if this be so, it will be difficult +to prove that he rose from the dead. Again, it was a common occurrence +for crucified men not to die; sometimes it happened that their guards +allowed them to be spirited away--even nowadays we have known of prison +guards being bribed to allow a prisoner to escape. Again, the events of +the return of Jesus may have been just such psychic phenomena as we are +trying in this chapter to explain. Or, once more, they may have been +purely legends. A very brief study will convince a thinking person that +the people of that time were ready to believe anything, and to accept +facts upon such authority, and to make them the basis for a scientific +conclusion, is simply to be childish. + +I shall be told, of course, that it is in the Bible, and therefore it +must be true. The Bible is inspired, you say; and perhaps this is so. +But then, a great deal of other literature is inspired, and that does +not relieve me of the task of comparing these various inspirations, and +judging them, and picking out what is of use to me. The Bible is the +literature of the ancient Hebrews for a couple of thousand years. It +represents what the race mind of a great people for one generation after +another judged worth recording and preserving. You may get an idea what +this means, if you will picture to yourself a large volume of English +literature, containing some Teutonic myths, and the Saxon chronicles, +and the "Morte d'Arthur," and several of Chaucer's stories, and some +Irish fairy tales, and some of Bacon's essays, and Shakespeare's "Venus +and Adonis," and the English prayer book, and the architect's +specifications for Westminster Abbey, and a good part of "Burke's +Peerage"; also Blackstone's "Commentaries," a number of Wesley's hymns, +and Pope's "Essay on Man," and some chapters of Carlyle's "Past and +Present," and Gladstone's speeches, and Blake's poems, and Captain +Cook's story of his voyage around the world, and Southey's "Life of +Nelson," and Morris's "News from Nowhere," and Blatchford's "Merrie +England," and scores of pages from Hansard, which is the equivalent of +our Congressional Record. You may find this description irreverent, but +do not think it is meant so. Do me the honor to get out your Bible and +look it over from this point of view! + +But, you say, if we die altogether when we finish this earthly life, +what becomes of moral responsibility and the punishment of sins? What +shall we say to the wicked man to make him be good, if we cannot reward +him with a heaven and frighten him with a hell? Well, my first answer is +that we have been trying this process for a couple of thousand years, +and the results seem to indicate that we might better seek out some +other method of inducing men to behave themselves. They do not believe +so completely in heaven and hell these days, but there were times in +history when they did believe completely, and not merely were the +believers just as cruel, they were just as treacherous and just as +gluttonous and just as drunken. If you want to satisfy yourself on this +point, I refer you to my book "The Profits of Religion," page 129. + +Now, as a matter of fact, I think I can discern the outlines of a system +of rewards and punishments automatically working in the life of men. I +am not sure that I can prove that the wicked always get punished and the +virtuous always rewarded; yet, when I stop and think, I am sure that I +would not care to change places with any of the wicked people that I +know in this world. Life may not always be "getting" them, but it has a +way of "getting" their descendants, and I could not be entirely happy if +I knew that my son and his sons were going to share the fate which I now +observe befalling, for example, the grand dukes of Russia and their +children. Life is one thing, and it does not exist for the individual, +but for the race; its causes and effects do not always manifest +themselves in one individual, but in a line of descendants. "Why are +they called dynasties?" asked one of my professors of history; and a +student brought the session to an end by answering: "Because that is +what they always seem to do!" + +But this is not perfect justice, you will argue. It is not perfect, from +the point of view of you or me; but then, I ask, what else is there in +the world that is perfect from that point of view? Why should our +justice be any more perfect than, for example, our health or our +thinking or our climate or our government? And, may it not very well be +that our justice is up to us, in precisely the same way that some of +these other things are up to us? Maybe what we have to do is to set to +work to see to it that virtue does always get rewarded and vice does +always get punished, right here and now, instead of waiting for an +omnipotent God to attend to it in some hypothetical heaven. + +I find this life of mine very wonderful, and enormously interesting. I +am willing to take it on the terms that it is given, and to try to make +the best of it; and I do not see that I have any right to dictate what +shall be given me in some future life. If my father gives me a Christmas +present, I am happy and grateful; and, of course, if I know that he is +going to give me another present next Christmas, I am still more happy; +but I do not see that I have any right to argue that because he gives me +one Christmas present, he must give me an unlimited number of them, and +I think it would be very ungrateful of me to refuse to thank him for a +Christmas present until I had made sure that I was to get one next time! + +Neither do I find myself such a wonderful person that I can assert that +the morality of the universe absolutely depends upon the fact that I am +immortal. Of course, I should like to live forever, and to know all the +wonderful things that are going to happen in the world, and if it is +true that I am so to live, I shall be immensely delighted. But I cannot +say that it _must_ be true, and all I can do is to investigate the +probabilities. On this point my view is stated in a sentence of +Spinoza's: "He who would love God rightly must not desire that God love +him in return." + +To sum up, the question of immortality is purely a question of fact. It +is one to be approached in a spirit of open-minded inquiry, entirely +unaffected by hopes or fears or dogmas or moral claims. It is worth +while to get clear that we may be immortal, even though we do not now +know it and cannot now prove it; it is possible that all psychic +research might end in telepathy, and still, when we die, we might wake +up and find ourselves alive. It might possibly be that some of us are +immortal and not all of us. It might be that some parts of us are +immortal and not the rest. It might be that our subconsciousness is +immortal and not our consciousness. It might be that all of us, or some +part of us, survive for a time, but not forever. This last is something +which I myself am inclined to think may be the case. + +Also, it seems worthwhile to mention that it is no argument against +immortality that we cannot imagine it, that we cannot picture a universe +consisting of uncountable billions of living souls, or what these souls +would do to pass the time. It may very well be that among these souls +there is no such thing as time. It may be that they are thoroughly +occupied in ways beyond our imagining, or again, that they are not +occupied, and under no necessity of being occupied. Let the person who +presents such arguments begin by picturing to you how the brain cells +manage to store up the uncounted millions of memories which you have, +the thousands of words and combinations of words, and the thoughts which +go with them, musical notes and tunes, colors and odors and visual +impressions, memories of the past and hopes of the future and dreams +that never were. Where are all those hundreds of millions of things, and +what are they like when they are not in our consciousness, and how do +they pass the time, and where were they in the hundreds of millions of +years before we were born, and where will they be in the hundreds of +millions of years of the future? When our wise men can answer these +questions completely, it will be time enough for them to tell us about +the impossibility of immortality. + + + + +CHAPTER XV + +THE EVIDENCE FOR SURVIVAL + + (Discusses the data of psychic research, and the proofs of + spiritism thus put before us.) + + +Let us now take up the question of survival of personality after death +from the strictly scientific point of view; let us consider what facts +we have, and the indications they seem to give. First, we know that to +all appearances the consciousness and the subconsciousness are bound up +with the body. They grow with the body, they decline with the body, they +seem to die with the body. We can irretrievably damage the consciousness +by drawing a whiff of cyanogen gas into the lungs, or by sticking a pin +into the brain, or by clogging one of its tiny blood vessels with waste +matter. It is terrible to us to think that the mind of a great poet or +prophet or statesman may be snuffed out of existence in such a way; but +then, it is no argument against a fact to say that it is terrible. +Insanity is terrible, war is terrible, pestilence is terrible, so also +are tigers and poisonous snakes; but all these things exist, and all +these things have power over the wisest and greatest mind, to put an end +to its work on this earth at least. + +And now we come with the new instrument of psychic research, to probe +the question: What becomes of this consciousness when it disappears? Can +we prove that it is still in existence, and is able by any method to +communicate with us? Those who answer "Yes" argue that the mind of the +dead person, unable to use its own bodily machinery any longer, manages +in the hypnotic trance to use the bodily machinery of another person, +called a "medium," and by it to make some kind of record to identify +itself. + +This, of course, is a strange idea, and requires a good deal of proof. +The law of probability requires us not to accept an unlikely +explanation, if there is any more simple one which can account for the +facts. When we examine the product of automatic writing, table-tipping, +and other psychic phenomena, we have first to ask ourselves, Is there +anything in all this which cannot be explained by what we already know? +Then, second, we have to ask, Is there any other supposition which will +explain the facts, and which is easier to believe than the spirit +theory? + +These "spirits" apparently desire to convince us of their reality, and +they tell us many things which are expected to convince us; they tell us +things which we ourselves do not know, and which spirits might know. But +here again we run up against the problem of the subconsciousness, with +its infinite mass of "forgotten" knowledge. It is not so easy for the +"spirits" to tell us things which we can be sure our subconscious mind +could not possibly contain. Also, there comes the additional element of +telepathy. It appears to be a fact that under trance conditions, or +under any especially exciting conditions of the consciousness, one mind +can reach out and take something out of another mind, or one mind can +cause something to be passed over to another mind; and so information +can be communicated to the mind of a medium, and can appear in automatic +writing, or in clairvoyance, or in crystal gazing. + +One of the most conscientious and earnest of all the investigators of +this subject was the late Professor Hyslop, who many years ago sought to +teach me "practical morality" (from the bourgeois point of view) in +Columbia University. Professor Hyslop worked for fifteen years with a +medium by the name of Mrs. Piper, who was apparently sincere and was +never exposed in any kind of fraud. In Professor Hyslop's books you will +find innumerable instances of amazing facts brought out in Mrs. Piper's +trances. You will find Professor Hyslop arguing that the only way +telepathy can account for these facts is by the supposition that there +is a universal subconscious mind, or that the subconscious mind of the +medium possesses the power to reach into the subconscious mind of every +other living person and take out anything from it. But for my part, I +cannot see that the case is quite so difficult. Professor Hyslop +recites, for example, how Mrs. Piper would tell him facts about some +long dead relative--facts which he did not know, but was later able to +verify. But that proves simply nothing at all, because there could be no +possible way for Professor Hyslop to be sure that he had never known +these facts about his relatives. The facts might have been in his +subconscious mind without having ever been in his conscious mind at all; +he might have heard people talking about these matters while he was +reading a book, or playing as a boy, paying no attention to what was +said. + +And then came Sir Oliver Lodge with his investigations. I will say this +for his work--he was the first person who was able to make real to my +mind the startling idea that perhaps after all the dead might be alive +and able to communicate with us. You will find what he has to say in his +book, "The Survival of Man," and it seems fair that a great scientist +and a great man should have a chance to convince you of what seem to him +the most important facts in the world. + +Sir Oliver's son Raymond was killed in the war, and it is claimed that +he began at once to communicate with his family. Among other things, he +told them of the existence of a picture, which none of them had ever +seen or heard of, a group photograph which he described in detail. But, +of course, other people in this group knew of the existence of the +photograph, and so we have again the possibility that some member of Sir +Oliver's family may have taken into his subconscious mind without +knowing it an impression or description of that picture. If you care to +experiment, you will find that you can frequently play a part in the +dreams of a child by talking to it in its sleep; and that is only one of +a thousand different ways by which some member of a family might +acquire, without knowing it, information of the existence of a +photograph. + +There is another possibility to be considered--that a portion of the +consciousness may survive, and not necessarily forever. We are +accustomed when death takes place to see the body before us, and we know +that we can preserve the body for thousands of years if we wish. Why is +it not possible that when conscious life is brought to a sudden end, +there may remain some portion of the consciousness, or of the +subconsciousness, cut off from the body, and slowly fading back into the +universal mind energy, whatever we please to call it? There is a hard +part of the body, the skeleton, which survives for some time; why might +there not be a central core of the mind which is similarly tough and +enduring? Of course, if consciousness is a function of the brain, it +must decay as the brain decays; but how would it be if the brain were a +function of the consciousness--which is, so far as I can see, quite as +likely a guess. + +I find many facts which seem to indicate the plausibility of this idea. +I notice that in trance phenomena it is the spirits of those recently +dead which seem to manifest the most vitality. Of course, you can go to +any seance in the "white light" district of your city and receive +communications from the souls of Caesar and Napoleon and Alexander the +Great and Pocahontas, and if the medium does not happen to be literary, +you can communicate with Hamlet and Don Quixote and Siegfried and +Achilles; but you will not find much reality about any of these people, +they will not tell you very much about the everyday details of their +lives. This fact that so much of what the "spirits" tell us is of our +own time tends to cast doubt on the idea that the dead survive forever. +How simple it would be to convince us, if the spirit of Sophocles would +come back to earth and tell us where to dig in order to find copies of +his lost tragedies! You would think that the soul of Sophocles, seeing +our great need of beauty and wisdom, would be interested to give us his +works! From genius, operating under the guidance of the conscious mind, +we get sublimity, majesty and power; but what the trance mediums give us +suggests, both in its moral and intellectual quality, the operation of +the subconscious. It is exactly like what we get, for example, from +dissociated personalities. + +There are, to be sure, the books of Patience Worth, produced by the +automatic writing of a lady in St. Louis, who tells us in evident good +faith that her conscious personality is entirely innocent of Patience, +and all her thought and doings. Patience writes long novels and dramas +in a quaint kind of old English, and the lady in St. Louis knows nothing +about this language. But does she positively know that when she was a +child, she never happened to be in the room with someone who was reading +old English aloud? Nothing seems more likely than that her subconscious +mind heard some quaint, strange language, and took possession of it, and +built up a personality around it, and even made a new language and a new +literature from that starting point. + +That is precisely the kind of thing in which the subconscious revels. It +creates new characters, with an imagination infinite and inexhaustible. +Who has not waked up and been astounded at the variety and reality of a +dream? Who has not told his dreams and laughed over them? The +subconscious will play at games, it will act and rehearse elaborate +roles; it will put on costumes, and delight in being Caesar and Napoleon +and Alexander the Great and Pocahontas and Hamlet and Don Quixote and +Siegfried and Achilles. Yes, it will even play at being "spirits"! It +will be mischievous and impish; it will be swallowed up with a sense of +its own importance, taking an insolent delight in convincing the world's +most learned scientists of the fact that its play-acting is reality. It +will call itself "Raymond" to move and thrill a grief-stricken family; +it will call itself "Phinuit" and "Dr. Hodgson," and cause an earnest +professor of "practical morality" to give up a respectable position in +Columbia University and write books to convince the world that the dead +are sending him messages. + +Consider, for example, the multiple personality of Miss Beauchamp. +Remember that here we are not dealing with any guess work about +"spirits"; here we have half a dozen different "controls," none of them +the least bit dead, but all of them a part of the consciousness of one +entirely alive young lady. A specialist has spent some six years +investigating the case, day after day, week after week, writing down the +minute details of what happens. And now consider the miscreant known as +"Sally." Sally is just as real as any child whom you ever held in your +arms. Sally has love and hate, fear and hope, pain and delight--and +Sally is a little demon, created entirely out of the subconsciousness of +a highly refined and conscientious young college graduate of Boston. +Sally spends Miss Beauchamp's money on candy, and eats it; Sally pawns +Miss Beauchamp's watch and deliberately loses the ticket; Sally uses +Miss Beauchamp's lips and tongue to tell lies about Miss Beauchamp; +Sally strikes Miss Beauchamp dumb, or makes her hear exactly the +opposite of what is spoken to her. Yes, and Sally pleads and fights +frantically for her life; Sally enters into intrigues with other parts +of Miss Beauchamp, and for years deliberately fools Doctor Prince, who +is her Recording Angel and Heavenly Judge! + +And can anybody doubt that Sally could have fooled a grieving mother, +and made that mother think she was talking to the ghost of a long lost +child? Can anybody doubt that Sally could and would play the part of any +person she had ever known, or of any historic character she had ever +read about? And don't overlook the all-important fact that the conscious +Miss Beauchamp was absolutely innocent of all this, and was horrified +when she was told about it. So here you have the following situation, no +matter of guesswork, but definitely established: your dearest friend may +act as a medium, and in all good faith may bring to the surface some +part of his or her subconsciousness, which masquerades before you in a +hundred different roles, and plays upon you with deliberate malice the +most subtle and elaborate and cruel tricks. + +And how much worse the situation becomes when to this there is added the +possibility of conscious fraud! When the medium is a person who is +taking your money, and thrives by making you believe in the "spirits" +she produces! You may go to Lily Dale, in New York state, the home of +the Spiritualists, where they have a convention every summer, and in row +after row of tents you may hear, and even see, every kind of spirit you +ever dreamed of, ringing bells and shaking tambourines and dancing jigs. +And you may see poor farmers' wives, with tears streaming down their +cheeks, listening to the endearments of their dead children, and to +wisdom from the lips of Oliver Wendell Holmes speaking with a Bowery +accent. This kind of thing was exposed many years ago by Will Irwin in a +book called "The Medium Game"; and then--after traveling from one kind +of medium to another, and studying all their frauds, Irwin tells how he +went into a "parlor" on Sixth Avenue, and there by a fat old woman who +had never seen him before, was suddenly told the most intimate secrets +of his life! + +It has recently been announced that Thomas A. Edison is at work upon a +device to enable spirits to communicate with the living, if there really +are spirits seeking to do this. It is Edison's idea that spirits may +inhabit some kind of infinitely rarefied astral body, and he proposes to +manufacture an instrument which is sensitive to an impression many +millions of times fainter than anything the human body can feel. This +should make it easier for the spirits, and should constitute a fairer +test, possibly a decisive one. When that machine is perfected and put to +work by scientific men, I wish to suggest a few tests which will +convince me that there really are spirits, and that the results are not +to be explained by telepathy. + +First, assuming that the spirits live forever, there are some useful +things which were known to the people of ancient time, and are not known +to anyone living now. For example, let one of the Egyptian craftsmen +come forward and tell us the secret of their glass-staining, which I +understand is now a lost art. And then Sophocles, as I have already +suggested, will tell us where we can find his lost dramas; or if he +doesn't know where any copies are buried, let him find in the spirit +world some scribe or librarian or book-lover who can give us this +priceless information. All over the ancient lands are buried and +forgotten cities, and in those cities are papyrus scrolls and graven +tablets and bricks. Infinite stores of knowledge are thus concealed from +us; and how simple for the ancient ones who possess this information to +make it known to us, and so to convince us of their reality! + +Or, again, supposing that spirits are not immortal, but that they slowly +fade from life as do their bodies. Suppose that a Raymond Lodge or other +recently dead soldier wishes to communicate with his father and to +convince his father that it is really an independent being, and not +simply a part of the father's subconscious mind--let him try something +like this. Let the father write six brief notes, and put them in six +envelopes all alike, and shuffle them up and put them in a hat and draw +out one of them. Now, assuming that the experimenter is honest, there is +no living human being who knows the contents of that envelope, and if +the medium is dipping into the subconscious mind of the experimenter, +the chances are one in six of the right note being hit upon. Assuming +that spirits may not be able to get inside an envelope and read a folded +letter, there is no objection to the experimenter, provided he is +honest, and provided there are no mirrors or other tricks, holding the +envelope behind his back, and tearing it open, and spreading it out for +the convenience of the spirit. And now, if the spirit can read that +letter correctly every time, we shall be fairly certain that whatever +force we are dealing with, it is not the subconscious mind of the +experimenter. + +Or, let us take another test. Let us have a roulette wheel in a covered +box, or hidden away so that no one but the spirit can see it. We spin +the wheel, and any one of the habitues of Monte Carlo can figure out the +chance of the little ball dropping into any particular number. If now +the spirit can tell us each time where we shall find the ball, we shall +know that we are dealing with knowledge which does not exist either in +the conscious or the subconscious mind of any living human being. + +Among the things that "spirits" have been accustomed to do, since the +days when they first made their appearance with the Fox sisters in +America, are the lifting of tables and the ringing of bells and the +assuming of visible forms. These are what is known as +"materializations," and when I was a boy, and used to hear people +talking about these things, there was always one test required: let the +materializations manifest themselves upon recording instruments +scientifically devised; let photographs be taken of them, let them be +weighed and measured, and so on. Well, time has moved forward, and these +tests have been met, and it appears that "materializations" are +facts--although it is still as uncertain as ever what they are +materializations of. An English scientist, Professor Crawford, has +published a book entitled "The Reality of Psychic Phenomena," in which +he tells the results of many years of testing materializations by the +strictest scientific methods. When the medium "levitates" a table--that +is, causes it to go up in the air without physical contact--it appears +that her own weight increases by exactly the weight of the table. When +she exerts any force, which apparently she can do at a distance, the +recording instruments show the exact counter-force in her own body. + +The results of these investigations are calculated at first to take your +breath away. It begins to appear that the theosophists may be right, and +that we may have one or more "astral" bodies within or coincident with +the physical body; and that under the trance conditions we mold and make +over this "astral" body in accordance with our imaginations, precisely +as a sculptor molds the clay. At any rate, our subconsciousness has the +power to project from it masses of substance, and to cause these to take +all kinds of forms, for example, human faces, which have been +photographed innumerable times. Or the body can shoot out long rods or +snaky projections, which lift tables, and exert force which has been +recorded upon pressure instruments and weighed by scales. + +As I write, a friend lends me a fifteen-dollar volume, a translation +just published of an elaborate work by Baron von Schrenck-Notzing, a +physician of Munich, giving minute details of four years' experiments in +this field. So rigid was this investigator in his efforts to exclude +fraud, that not merely was the medium stripped and sewed up in black +tights, but the "cabinet" in which she sat was a big sack of black +cloth, everywhere sewed tight by machine. Every crevice of the medium's +body was searched before and after the tests, and every inch of the +"cabinet" gone over. The investigators sat within a couple of feet of +the medium, and would draw back the curtains, and while holding her +hands and her feet, would watch great masses of filmy gray and white +stuff exude from the medium's mouth, from her armpits and breasts and +sides. This would happen in red light of a hundred candle power, by +which print could be easily read; and the medium would herself +illuminate the phenomena with a red electric torch. The investigators +would be privileged to examine these "phantom" forms, to touch them +gently, and be touched by them--soft and slimy, like the tongue of an +animal; but sometimes the things would misbehave, and strike them in the +eye, hurting them. + +The medium, a young French girl living in the home of the wife of a +well-known French playwright, had begun with spiritualist ideas, but +came to take a matter-of-fact attitude to what happened, and in her +trances would labor to mold these emanations into hands or faces, as +requested by those present. She finally succeeded in allowing them to +separate the soft mucous stuff from her body, and keep it for chemical +and bacteriological examination. All this time she would be surrounded +by a battery of cameras, nine at once, some of them inside the cabinet; +and when the desired emanation was in sight, all these cameras would be +set off by flashlight, and in the book you have over two hundred such +photographs, showing faces and hands from every point of view. There are +even moving-pictures, showing the material coming out of her mouth and +going back! + +It is evident that we have here a whole universe of unexplored +phenomena; and it seems that many of the old-time superstitions which +were dumped overboard have now to be dragged back into the boat and +examined in the light of new knowledge. What could smack more of magic +and fraud than crystal-gazing? Yet it appears that the subconsciousness +has power to project an image of its hidden memories into a crystal +ball, where it may be plainly seen. We find so well-recognized an +authority as Dr. Morton Prince using this method to enable one of the +many Miss Beauchamps to recall incidents in her previous life which were +otherwise entirely lost to her. Likewise this exploration of the +disintegration of personality enables us to watch in the making all the +phenomena of trance and ecstasy which have had so much to do with the +making of religions. We know now how Joan of Arc heard the "voices," and +we can make her hear more voices or make her stop hearing voices, as we +prefer. Also we know all about demons and "demoniac possession." We can +cast out demons--and without having to cause them to enter a herd of +swine! We may some day be prepared to investigate the wonder stories +which the Yogis tell us, about their ability to leave their physical +bodies in a trance, and to appear in England at a few moments' notice +for the transaction of their spiritual business! + +But we want things proven to us, and we don't want the people with whom +we work to be animated either by religious fanaticism or by money greed. +We are ready to unlimber our minds, and prepare for long journeys into +strange regions, but we want to move cautiously, and choose our route +carefully, and be sure we do not lose our way! We want to deal +rationally with life; we don't want to make wild guesses, or to choose a +complicated and unlikely solution when a simple one will suffice. But, +on the other hand, we must be alive to the danger of settling down on +our little pile of knowledge, and refusing to take the trouble to +investigate any more. That is a habit of learned men, I am sorry to say; +the law of inertia applies to the scientist, as well as to the objects +he studies. The scientists of our time have had to be prodded into +considering each new discovery about the subconscious mind, precisely as +the scientists of Galileo's time had to be prodded to watch him drop +weights from the tower of Pisa. When he told them that the earth moved +round the sun instead of the sun round the earth, they tortured him in a +dungeon to make him take it back, and he did so, but whispered to +himself, "And yet it moves." And it did move, of course, and continued +to move. And in exactly the same way, if it be true that we have these +hidden forces in us, they will continue to manifest themselves, and +masses of people will continue to flock to Lily Dale, and to pay out +their hard-earned money, until such a time as our learned men set to +work to find out the facts and tell us how we can utilize these forces +without the aid of either superstition or charlatanry. + + + + +CHAPTER XVI + +THE POWERS OF THE MIND + + (Sets forth the fact that knowledge is freedom and ignorance is + slavery, and what science means to the people.) + + +We have now completed a brief survey of the mind and its powers. +Whatever we may have proved or failed to prove, this much we may say +with assurance: the reader who has followed our brief sketch attentively +has been disabused of any idea he may have held that he knows it all; +and this is always the first step towards knowledge. + +The mind is the instrument whereby our race has lifted itself out of +beasthood. It is the instrument whereby we hold ourselves above the +forces which seek to drag us down, and whereby we shall lift ourselves +higher, if higher we are to go. How shall we protect this precious +instrument? How shall we complete our mastery of it? What are the laws +of the conduct of the mind? + +The process of the mind is one of groping outward after new facts, and +digesting and assimilating them, as the body gropes after and digests +and assimilates food. The senses bring us new impressions, and we take +these and analyze them, tear them into the parts which compose them, +compare them with previous sensations, recognize difference in things +which seem to be alike, and resemblances in things which seem to be +different; we classify them, and provide them with names, which are, as +it were, handles for the mind to grasp. Above all, we seek for causes; +those chains of events which make what we know as order in the world of +phenomena. And when the mind has what seems to be a cause, it proceeds +to test it according to methods it has worked out, the rules and +principles of experimental science. + +It is a comparatively small number of sensations which the body brings +to the mind of itself; it is a narrow world in which we should live if +our minds adopted a passive attitude toward life. But some minds possess +what we call curiosity; they set out upon their own impulse to explore +life; they discover new laws and make new experiences and new +sensations for themselves. The mind forms an idea, and at first, after +the fashion of the ancient Greek philosophers, it glorifies that idea +and sets it in the seat of divinity. But presently comes the empirical +method, which refuses authority to any idea unless it can stand the test +of experiment, and prove that it corresponds with reality. Nowadays the +thinker amasses his facts, and forms a theory to explain them, and then +proceeds to try out this theory by the most rigid method that he or his +critics can devise. If the theory doesn't "work"--that is, if it doesn't +explain all the facts and stand all the tests--it is thrown away like a +worn-out shoe. So little by little a body of knowledge is built up which +is real knowledge; which will serve us in our daily lives, which we can +use as foundation-stones in the structure of our civilization. + +By this method of research man is expanding his universe beyond anything +that could have been conceived in the pre-scientific days. Hour by hour, +while we work and play and sleep, the mind of our race is discovering +new worlds in which our posterity will dwell. For uncounted ages man +walked upon the earth, surrounded by infinite swarms of bacterial life +of whose existence he never dreamed. The invisible rays of the spectrum +beat upon him, and he knew nothing of what they did to him, whether good +or evil. He lifted his head and saw vast universes of suns, in +comparison with which his world was a mere speck of dust; yet to him +these universes were globes or lanterns which some divinity had hung in +the sky. + +One of the most fascinating illustrations of how the mind runs ahead of +the senses is the story of the planet Uranus, which, less than two +hundred years ago, had never been beheld by the eye of man. A +mathematician seated in his study, working over the observations of +other planets, their motions in relation to their mass and distance, +discovered that their behavior was not as it should be. At certain times +none of them were in quite the right place, and he decided that this +variation must be due to the existence of an unknown body. He worked out +the problem of what must be the mass and the exact orbit of this body, +in order for it to be responsible for the variations observed; and when +he had completed these calculations, he announced to the astronomical +world, "Turn your telescopes to a certain spot in the heavens at a +certain minute of a certain night, and you will find a new planet of a +certain size." And so for the first time the human senses became aware +of a fact, which by themselves they might not have discovered in all +eternity. + +Now, the importance of exact knowledge concerning a new planet may not +be apparent to the ordinary man; but if the thing which is discovered +is, for example, an unknown ray which will move an engine or destroy a +cancer, then we realize the worthwhileness of research, and the masters +of the world's commerce are willing to give here and there a pittance +for the increase of such knowledge. But men of science, who have by this +time come to a sense of their own dignity and importance, understand +that there is no knowledge about reality which is useless, no research +into nature which is wasted. You might say that to describe and classify +the fleas which inhabit the bodies of rats and ground-squirrels, and to +study under the microscope the bacteria which live in the blood of these +fleas--that this would be an occupation hardly worthy of the divinity +that is in man. But presently, as a result of this knowledge about fleas +and flea diseases being in existence and available, a bacteriologist +discovers the secret of the dread bubonic plague, which hundreds of +times in past history has wiped out a great part of the population of +Europe and Asia. + +Mark Twain tells in his "Connecticut Yankee" how his hero was able to +overcome the wizard Merlin, because he knew in advance of an eclipse of +the sun. And this was fiction, of course; but if you prefer fact, you +may read in the memoirs of Houdin, the French conjurer, how he was able +to bring the Arab tribes into subjection to the French government by +depriving the great chieftains of their strength. He gathered them into +a theatre, and invited their mighty men upon the stage, and there was an +iron weight, and they were able to lift it when Houdin permitted, and +not to lift it when he forbade. These noble barbarians had never heard +of the electro-magnet, and could not conceive of a force that could +operate through a solid wooden floor beneath their feet. + +Such things, trivial as they are, serve to illustrate the difference +between ignorance and knowledge, and the power which knowledge gives. +The man who knows is godlike to those who do not know; he may enslave +them, he may do what he pleases with their lives, and they are powerless +to help themselves. Anyone who would help them must begin by giving them +knowledge, real knowledge. There is no such thing as freedom without +knowledge, and it must be the best knowledge, it must be new knowledge; +he who goes against new knowledge armed with old knowledge is like the +Chinese who went out to meet machine-guns with bows and arrows, and with +umbrellas over their heads. + +Once upon a time knowledge was the prerogative of kings and priests and +ruling castes; but this supreme power has been wrested from them, and +this is the greatest step in human progress so far taken. "Seek and ye +shall find," is the law concerning knowledge today. "Knock, and it shall +be opened unto you." In this, my Book of the Mind, I say to you that +knowledge is your priceless birthright, and that you should repudiate +all men and all institutions and all creeds and all formulas which seek +to keep this heritage from you. Beware of men who bid you believe +something because it is told you, or because your fathers believed it, +or because it is written in some ancient book, or embodied in some +ancient ceremonial. Break the chains of these venerable spells; and at +the same time beware of the modern spells which have been contrived to +replace them! Beware of party cries and shibboleths, the idols of the +forum, as Plato called them, the prejudices which are set as snares for +your feet. Beware of cant--that paraphernalia of noble sentiments, +artificially manufactured by politicians and newspapers for the purpose +of blinding you to their knaveries. Remember that you live in a world of +class conflicts; at every moment of your life your mind is besieged by +secret enemies, it is exposed to poison gas-clouds deliberately released +by people who seek to make use of you for purposes which are theirs and +not yours. In the fairy-tales we used to love, the hero was provided +with magic protection against the perils of those times; but what hero +and what magic will guard the modern man against the propaganda of +militarism, nationalism, and capitalist imperialism? + +The mind is like the body in that it can be trained, it can be taught +sound habits, its powers can be enormously increased. There are many +books on mind and memory training, some of which are useful, and some of +which are trash. There is an English system widely advertised, called +"Pelmanism," of which I have personally made no test, but it has won +endorsements of a great many people who do not give their endorsements +lightly. + +This is the subject of applied psychology, and just as in medicine, or +in law, or in any of the arts, there is a vast amount of charlatanry, +but there is also genuine knowledge being patiently accumulated and +standardized. When the United States government had to have an army in a +hurry it did not make its millions of young men into teamsters or +aviators at random. It used the new methods of determining reaction +times, and testing the coordination of mind and body. Recently I visited +the Whittier Reform School in California, where delinquent boys are +educated by the state. A boy had been set to work in the tailor shop, +and it had been found that he was unable to make the buttons and the +buttonholes of a coat come in the right place. For nine years the state +of California, and before it the state of Georgia, had been laboring to +teach this boy to make buttons and buttonholes meet; the effort had cost +some five thousand dollars, to say nothing of all the coats which were +spoiled, and all the mental suffering of the victim and his teachers. +Finally someone persuaded the state of California to spend a few +thousand dollars and install a psychological bureau for the purpose of +testing all the inmates of the institution; so by a half hour's +examination the fact was developed that this boy was mentally defective. +Although he was eighteen years old in body, his mind was only eight +years old, and so he would never be able to achieve the feat of making +buttons and buttonholes meet. + +This is a new science which you may read about in Terman's "The +Measurement of Intelligence." By testing normal children, it is +established that certain tasks can be performed at certain ages. A child +of three can point to his eyes, his nose and his mouth; he can repeat a +sentence of six syllables, and repeat two digits, and give his family +name. Older children are asked to look at a picture and then tell what +they saw; to note omissions in a picture, to arrange blocks according to +their weight, to arrange words into sentences, to note absurdities in +statements, to count backwards, and to make change. Children of fifteen +are asked to interpret fables, to reverse the hands of a clock, and so +on. Of course there are always variations; every child will be better at +some kinds of tests than at others. But by having a wide variety, and +taking the average, you establish a "mental age" for the child--which +may be widely different from its physical age. You may find some whose +minds have stopped growing altogether, and can only be made to grow by +special methods of education. Enlightened communities are now conducting +separate schools for defective children--replacing the old-fashioned +schoolmaster who wore out birch-rods trying to force poor little +wretches to learn what was beyond their power. + +In the same way psychology can be applied in industry, and in the +detection of crime. Here, too, there is a vast amount of "fake," but +also the beginning of a science. Our laws do not as yet permit the use +of automatic writing and the hypnotic trance in the investigation of +crime, but they have sometimes permitted some of the simpler tests, for +example, those of memory association. The examiner prepares a list of a +hundred names of objects, and reads those names one after another, and +asks the person he is investigating to name the first thing which is +suggested to him by each word in turn. "Engine" will suggest "steam," or +perhaps it will suggest "train"; "coat" will suggest "trousers," or +perhaps it will suggest "pocket," and so on. The examiner holds a +stop-watch, and notes what fraction of a second each one of these +reactions takes. The ordinary man, who is not trying to conceal +anything, will give all his associations promptly, and the reaction +times will be approximately alike. But suppose the man has just murdered +somebody with an axe, and buried the body in a cellar with a fire +shovel, and taken a pocketbook, and a watch, and a locket, and a number +of various objects, and climbed out of the cellar window by breaking the +glass; and now suppose that in his list of a hundred objects the +psychologist introduces unexpectedly a number of these things. In each +case the first memory association of the criminal will be one which he +does not wish to give. He will have to find another, and that inevitably +takes time. One or two such delays might be accidental; but if every +time there is any suggestion of the murder, or the method or scene of +the murder, there is noticed confusion and delay, you may be sure that +the conscious mind is interfering with the subconscious mind. The +difference between the conscious and the subconscious mind is always +possible to detect, and if you are permitted to be thorough in your +experiments, you can make certain what is in the subconscious mind that +the conscious mind is trying to conceal. + +Here, as everywhere in life, knowledge is power, and expert knowledge +confers mastery over the shrewdest untrained mind. The only trouble is +that under our present social system the trained mind is very apt to be +working in the interest of class privilege. The psychologist who is +employed by a great corporation, or by a police department, may be as +little worthy of trust as a chemist who is engaged in making poison +gases to be used by capitalist imperialism for the extermination of its +rebellious slaves. But what this proves is not that scientific knowledge +is untrustworthy, but merely that the workers must acquire it, they must +have their own organizations and their own experiments in every field. +To give knowledge to the masses of mankind, slow and painful as the +process seems, is now the most important task confronting the +enlightened thinker. + +The method of psychoanalysis gives us also much insight into the +phenomena of genius, and the hope that we may ultimately come to +understand it. At present we are embarrassed because genius is so often +closely allied to eccentricity; the supernormal appears in connection +with the subnormal--and it is often hard to tell them apart. Great poets +and painters in revolt against a world of smug commercialism, adopt +irresponsibility as their religion; they live in a world of their own, +they dress like freaks, they refuse to pay their debts, or to be true to +their wives. They are followed by a host of disciples, who adopt the +defects of the master as a substitute for his qualities. And so there +grows up a perverted notion of what genius is, and wholly false +standards of artistic quality. There is nothing mankind needs more than +sure and exact tests of mental superiority; not merely the ability to +acquire languages and to solve mathematical equations, but the ability +to carry in the mind intense emotions, while at the same time shaping +and organizing them by the logical faculty, selecting masses of facts +and weaving them into a pattern calculated to awaken the emotion in +others. This is the last and greatest work of the human spirit, and to +select the men who can do it, and foster their activity, is the ultimate +purpose of all true science. + + + + +CHAPTER XVII + +THE CONDUCT OF THE MIND + + (Concludes the Book of the Mind with a study of how to preserve and + develop its powers for the protection of our lives and the lives of + all men.) + + +Someone wrote me the other day, asking, "When is the best time to +acquire knowledge?" I answer, "The time is now." It is easier to learn +things when you are young, but you cannot be young when you want to be, +and if you are old, the best time to acquire knowledge is when you are +old. It is true that the brain-cells seem to harden like the body, and +it is less easy for them to take on new impressions; but it can be done, +and just as Seneca began to learn Greek at eighty, I know several old +men whom the recent war has shaken out of their grooves of thought and +compelled to deal with modern ideas. + +But if you are young, then so much the better! Then the divine thrill of +curiosity is keenest; then your memory is fresh, and can be trained; +your mind is plastic, and you can form sound habits. You can teach +yourself to respect truth and to seek it, you can teach yourself +accuracy, open-mindedness, flexibility, persistence in the search for +understanding. + +First of all, I think, is accuracy. Learn to think straight! Let your +mind be as a sharp scalpel, penetrating unrealities and falsehoods, +cutting its way to the facts. When you set out to deal with a certain +subject, acquire mastery of it, so that you can say, "I know." And yet, +never be too sure that you know! Never be so sure, that you are not +willing to consider new facts, and to change your way of thinking if it +should be necessary. I look about me at the world, and see tigers and +serpents, dynamite and poison gas and forty-two centimeter shells--yet I +see nothing in the world so deadly to men as an error of the mind. Look +at the mental follies about you! Look at the prejudices, the delusions, +the lies deliberately maintained--and realize the waste of it all, the +pity of it all! + +Every man, it seems, has his pet delusions, which he hugs to his bosom +and loves because they are his own. If you try to deprive him of those +delusions, it is as though you tore from a woman's arms the child she +has borne. I have written a book called "The Profits of Religion," and +never a week passes that there do not come to me letters from people who +tell me they have read this book with pleasure and profit, they are +grateful to me for teaching them so much about the follies and delusions +of mankind, and it is all right and all true, save for two or three +pages, in which I deal with the special hobby which happens to be their +hobby! What I say about all the other creeds is correct--but I fail to +understand that the Mormon religion is a dignified and inspired +religion, a gift from on high, and if only I would carefully study the +"Book of Mormon," I would realize my error! Or it is all right, except +what I say about the Christian Scientists, or the Theosophists, or +perhaps one particular sect of the Theosophists, who are different from +the others. Today there lies upon my desk a letter from a man who has +read many of my books, and now is grief-stricken because he must part +company from me; he discovers that I permit myself to speak +disrespectfully about the Seventh Day Adventist religion, whereas he is +prepared to show the marvels of biblical prophecy now achieving +themselves in the world. How could any save a divinely revealed religion +have foreseen the present movement to establish the Sabbath by law? Yes, +and presently I shall see the last atom of the prophecy fulfilled--there +will be a death penalty for failure to obey the Sabbath law! + +Cultivate the great and precious virtue of open-mindedness. Keep your +thinking free, not merely from outer compulsions, but from the more +deadly compulsions of its own making--from prejudices and superstitions. +The prejudices and superstitions of mankind are like those diseased +mental states which are discovered by the psychoanalyst; what he calls a +"complex" in the subconscious mind, a tangle or knot which is a center +of disturbance, and keeps the whole being in a state of confusion. Each +group of men, each sect or class, have their precious dogmas, their +shibboleths, their sacred words and stock phrases which set their whole +beings aflame with fanaticism. They have also their phobias, their words +of terror, which cannot be spoken in their presence without causing a +brain-storm. + +At present the dread word of our time is "Communist." + +You can scarcely say the word without someone telephoning for the +police. And yet, when you meet a Communist, what is he? A worn and +fragile student, who has thought out a way to make the world a better +place to live in, and whose crime is that he tells others about his +idea! Or perhaps you belong to the other side, and then your word of +terror is the word "Capitalist." You meet a Capitalist, and what do you +find? Very likely you find a man who is kindly, generous in his personal +impulses, but bewildered, possibly a little frightened, still more +irritated and made stubborn. So you realize that nearly all men are +better than the institutions and systems under which they live; you +realize the urgent need of applying your reasoning powers to the problem +of social reorganization. + +Cultivate also, in the affairs of your mind, the ancient virtue of +humility. There is an oldtime poem, which perhaps was in your school +readers, "Oh, why should the spirit of mortal be proud?" My answer is, +for innumerable reasons. The spirit of mortal should be proud and must +be proud because life throbs in it, and because life is a marvelous +thing, and the excitement of life is perpetual. Yesterday I met a young +mother; and of what avail is all the pessimism of poets against the +pride of a young mother? "Oh!" she cried, and her face lighted up with +delight. "He said 'Goo'!" Yes, he said "Goo!"--and never since the world +began had there been a baby which had achieved that marvel. Presently it +will be, "Look, look, he is trying to walk!" Then he will be getting +marks at school, and presently he will be displaying signs of genius. +Always it will take an effort of the mind of that young mother to +realize that there are other children in the world as wonderful as her +own; and perhaps it will take many generations of mental effort before +there will be young mothers capable of realizing that some other child +is more wonderful than her child. + +In other words, it is by a definite process of broadening our minds that +we come to realize the lives of others, to transfer to them the interest +we naturally take in our own lives, and to admit them to a state of +equality with ourselves. This is one of the services the mind must +render for us; it is the process of civilizing us. And there is another, +and yet more important task, which is to make clear to us the fact that +we do not altogether make this life of ours, that there is a universe of +power and wisdom which is not ours, but on which we draw. "The fear of +the Lord is the beginning of wisdom," said the Psalmist. We know now +that fear is an ugly emotion, destructive to life; but it may be +purified and made into a true humility, which every thinking man must +feel towards life and its miracles. + +Also the man will have joy, because it is given him to share the high, +marvelous adventure of being. To the pleasures of the body there is a +limit, and it comes quickly; but the pleasures of the mind are infinite, +and no one who truly understands them can have a moment of boredom in +life. To a man who possesses the key to modern thought, who knows what +knowledge is and where to look for it, the life of the mind is a +panorama of delight perpetually unrolled before him. To the minds of our +ancestors there was one universe; but to our minds there are many +universes, and new ones continually discovered. + +The only question is, which one will you choose? Will you choose the +universe of outer space, the material world of infinity? Consider the +smallest insect that you can see, crawling upon the surface of the +earth; small as that insect is in relation to the earth, it is not so +small, by millions of times, as is the earth in relation to the universe +made visible to our eyes by the high-power telescope, plus the +photographic camera, plus the microscope. If you want to know the +miracles of this world of space, read Arrhenius' "The Life of the +Universe," or Simon Newcomb's "Sidelights on Astronomy." Suffice it here +to say that we have a chemistry of the stars, by means of the +spectroscope; that we can measure the speed and direction of stars by +the same means; that we have learned to measure the size of the stars, +and are studying stars which we cannot even see! And then along comes +Einstein, with his theories of "relativity," and makes it seem that we +have to revise a great part of this knowledge to allow for the fact that +not merely everything we look at, but also we ourselves, are flying +every which way through space! + +Or will you choose the universe of the atom, the infinity of the +material world followed the other way, so to speak? Big as is the +universe in relation to our world, and big as is our world in relation +to the insect that crawls on it, the insect is bigger yet in relation to +the molecules which compose its body; and these in turn are millions of +millions of times bigger than the atoms which compose them; and then, +behold, in the atom there are millions of millions of electrons--tiny +particles of electric energy! We cannot see these infinitely minute +things, any more than we can see the electricity which runs our trolley +cars; but we can see their effects, and we can count and measure them, +and deal with them in complicated mathematical formulas, and be just as +certain of their existence as we are of the dust under our feet. If you +wish to explore this wonderland, read Duncan's "The New Knowledge," or +Dr. Henry Smith Williams' "Miracles of Science." + +Or will you choose the universe of the subconscious, our racial past +locked up in the secret chambers of our mind? Or will you choose the +universe of the superconscious, the infinity of genius manifested in the +arts? By the device of art man not merely creates new life, he tests it, +he weighs it and measures it, he tries experiments with it, as the +physicist with the molecule and the astronomer with light. He finds out +what works, and what does not work, and so develops his moral and +spiritual muscles, training himself for his task as maker of life. + +Written words can give but a feeble idea of the wonders that are found +in these enchanted regions of the mind. Here are palaces of splendor +beyond imagining, here are temples with sacred shrines, and +treasure-chambers full of gold and priceless jewels. Into these places +we enter as Aladdin in the ancient tale; we are the masters here, and +all that we see is ours. He who has once got access to it--he possesses +not merely the magic lamp, he possesses all the wonderful fairy +properties of all the tales of our childhood. His is the Tarnhelm and +the magic ring which gives him power over his foes; his is the sword +Excalibur which none can break, and the silver bullet which brings down +all game, and the flying carpet upon which to travel over the earth, and +the house made of ginger-bread, and the three wishes which always come +true, and the philter of love, and the elixir of youth, and the music of +the spheres, and--who knows, some day he may come upon heaven, with St. +Peter and his golden key, and the seraphim singing, and the happy blest +conversing! + + + + +PART TWO + +THE BOOK OF THE BODY + + + + +CHAPTER XVIII + +THE UNITY OF THE BODY + + (Discusses the body as a whole, and shows that health is not a + matter of many different organs and functions, but is one problem + of one organism.) + + +The reader who has followed our argument this far will understand that +we are seldom willing to think of the body as separate from the mind. +The body is a machine, to be sure, but it is a machine that has a +driver, and while it is possible for a sound machine to have a drunken +and irresponsible driver, such a machine is not apt to remain sound very +long. Frequently, when there is trouble with the machine, we find the +fault to be with the driver; in other words, we find that what is needed +for the body is a change in the mind. + +If you wish to have a sound body, and to keep it sound as long as +possible, the first problem for you to settle is what you want to make +of your life; you must have a purpose, and confront the tasks of life +with energy and interest. What is the use of talking about health to a +man who has no moral purpose? He may answer--indeed, I have heard +victims of alcoholism answer--"Let me alone. I have a right to go to +hell in my own way." + +I am aware, of course, that the opposite of the proposition is equally +true. A man cannot enjoy much mental health while he has a sick body. It +is a good deal like the old question, Which comes first, the hen or the +egg? The mind and the body are bound up together, and you may try to +deal with each by turn, but always you find yourself having to deal with +both. Most physicians have a tendency to overlook the mind, and +Christian Scientists make a religion of overlooking the body, and each +pays the penalty in greatly reduced effectiveness. + +My first criticism of medical science, as it exists today, is that it +has a tendency to concentrate upon organs and functions, and to overlook +the central unity of the system. You will find a doctor who specializes +in the stomach and its diseases, and is apt to talk as if the stomach +were a thing that went around in the world all by itself. He will +discuss the question of what goes into your stomach, and overlook to +point out to you that your stomach is nourished by your blood-stream, +which is controlled by your nervous system, which in turn is controlled +by hope, by ambition, by love, by all the spiritual elements of your +being. A single pulse of anger or of fear may make more trouble with the +contents of your stomach than the doctor's pepsins and digestive +ferments can remedy in a week. + +Of course, you may do yourself some purely local injury, and so for a +time have a purely local problem. You may smash your finger, and that is +a problem of a finger; but neglect it for a few days, and let blood +poison set in, and you will be made aware that the human body is one +organism, and also that, in spite of any metaphysical theories you may +hold, your body does sometimes dominate and control your mind. + +Some one has said that the blood is the life; and certainly the blood is +both the symbol and the instrument of the body's unity. The blood +penetrates to all parts of the body and maintains and renews them. If +the blood is normal, the work of renewal does not often fail. If there +is a failure of renewal--that is, a disease--we shall generally find an +abnormal condition of the blood. The distribution of the blood is +controlled by the heart, a great four-chambered pump. One chamber drives +the blood to the lungs, a mass of fine porous membranes, where it comes +into contact with the air, and gives off the poisons which it has +accumulated in its course through the body, and takes up a fresh supply +of oxygen. By another chamber of the heart the blood is then sucked out +of the lungs, and by the next chamber it is driven to every corner of +the body. It takes to every cell of the body the protein materials which +are necessary for the body's renewal, and also the fuel materials which +are to be burned to supply the body's energy; also it takes some thirty +million millions of microscopic red corpuscles which are the carriers of +oxygen, and an even greater number of the white corpuscles, which are +the body's scavengers, its defenders from invasion by outside germs. + +There are certain outer portions of the body, such as nails and the +scales of the skin, which are dead matter, produced by the body and +pushed out from it and no longer nourished by the blood. But all the +still living parts of the body are fed at every instant by the stream of +life. Each cell in the body takes the fuel which it needs for its +activities, and combines it with the oxygen brought by the red +corpuscles; and when the task of power-production has been achieved, the +cell puts back into the blood-stream, not merely the carbon dioxide, but +many complex chemical products--ammonia, uric acid, and the "fatigue +poisons," indol, phenol and skatol. The blood-stream bears these along, +and delivers some to the sweat glands to be thrown out, and some to the +kidneys, and the rest to the lungs. + +All of this complicated mass of activities is in normal health perfectly +regulated and timed by the nervous system. You lie down to sleep, and +your muscles rest, and the vital activities slow up, your heart beats +only faintly; but let something frighten you, and you sit up, and these +faculties leap into activity, your heart begins to pound, driving a +fresh supply of blood and vital energy. You jump up and run, and these +organs all set to work at top speed. If they did not do so, your muscles +would have no fresh energy; they would become paralyzed by the fatigue +poisons, and you would be, as we say, exhausted. + +All the rest of the body might be described as a shelter and accessory +to the life-giving blood-stream; all the rest is the blood-stream's +means of protecting itself and renewing itself. The stomach is to digest +and prepare new blood material, the teeth are to crush it and grind it, +the hands are to seize it, the eyes are to see it, the brain is to +figure out its whereabouts. Man, in his egotism, imagines his little +world as the center of the universe; but the wise old fellow who lives +somewhere deep in our subconsciousness and looks after the welfare of +our blood-stream--he has far better reason for believing that all our +consciousness and our personality exist for him! + +Now, disease is some failure of this blood-stream properly to renew +itself or properly to protect itself and its various subsidiary organs. +When you find yourself with a disease, you call in a doctor; and unless +this doctor is a modern and progressive man, he makes the mistake of +assuming that the disease is in the particular organ where it shows +itself. You have, let us say, "follicular tonsilitis." (These medical +men have a love for long names, which have the effect of awing you, and +convincing you that you are in desperate need of attention.) Your throat +is sore, your tonsils are swollen and covered with white spots; so the +doctor hauls out his little black bag, and makes a swab of cotton and +dips it, say in lysol, and paints your tonsils. He knows by means of the +microscope that your tonsils are covered and filled with a mass of +foreign germs which are feeding upon them; also he knows that lysol +kills these germs, and he gives you a gargle for the same purpose, puts +you to bed, and gradually the swelling goes down, and he tells you that +he has cured you, and sends you a bill for services rendered. But maybe +the swelling does not go down; maybe it gets worse and you die. Then he +tells your family that nature was to blame. Nature is to blame for your +death, but it never occurs to anyone to ask what nature may have had to +do with your recovery. + +I do not know how many thousands of diseases medical science has now +classified. And for each separate disease there are complex formulas, +and your system is pumped full of various mineral and vegetable +substances which have been found to affect it in certain ways. Perhaps +you have a fever; then we give you a substance which reduces the +temperature of your blood-stream. It never occurs to us to reflect that +maybe nature has some purpose of her own in raising the temperature of +the blood; that this might be, so to speak, the heat of conflict, a +struggle she is waging to drive out invading germs; and that possibly it +would be better for the temperature to stay up until the battle is over. +Or maybe the heart is failing; then our medical man is so eager to get +something into the system that he cannot wait for the slow process of +the mouth and the stomach, he shoots some strychnine directly into the +blood-stream. It does not occur to him to reflect that maybe the heart +is slowing up because it is overloaded with fatigue poisons, of which it +cannot rid itself, and that the effect of stimulating it into fresh +activity will be to leave it more dangerously poisoned than before. + +We are dealing here with processes which our ancient mother nature has +been carrying on for a long time, and which she very thoroughly +understands. We ought, therefore, to be sure that we know what is the +final effect of our actions; more especially we ought to be sure that we +understand the cause of the evil, so that we may remove it, and not +simply waste our time treating symptoms, putting plasters on a cancer. +This is the fundamental problem of health; and in order to make clear +what I mean, I am going to begin by telling a personal experience, a +test which I made of medical science some twelve or fourteen years ago, +in connection with one of the simplest and most external of the body's +problems--the hair. First I will tell you what medical science was able +to do for my hair, and second what I myself was able to do, when I put +my own wits to work on the problem. + +I had been overworking, and was in a badly run down condition. I was +having headaches, insomnia, ulcerated teeth, many symptoms of a general +breakdown; among these I noticed that my hair was coming out. I decided +that it was foolish to become bald before I was thirty, and that I would +take a little time off, and spend a little money and have my hair +attended to. I did not know where to go, but I wanted the best authority +available, so I wrote to the superintendent of the largest hospital in +New York, asking him for the name of a reliable specialist in diseases +of the scalp. The superintendent replied by referring me to a certain +physician, who was the hospital's "consulting dermatologist," and I went +to see this physician, whose home and office were just off Fifth Avenue. + +He examined my scalp, and told me that I had dandruff in my hair, and +that he would give me a prescription which would remove this dandruff +and cause my hair to stop falling out. He charged me ten dollars for the +visit, which in those days was more money than it is at present. Being +of an inquiring turn of mind, I tried to get my money's worth by +learning what there was to learn about the human hair. I questioned this +gentleman, and he told me that the hair is a dead substance, and that +its only life is in the root. He explained that barbers often persuade +people to have their hair singed, to keep it from falling out, and that +this was an utterly futile procedure, and likewise all shampooing and +massage, which only caused the hair to fall out more quickly. It was +better even not to wash the hair too often. All that was needed was a +mixture of chemicals to kill the dandruff germs; and so I had the +prescription put up at a drug store, and for a couple of years I +religiously used it according to order, and it had upon my hair +absolutely no effect whatever. + +So here was the best that medical science could do. But still, I did not +want to be bald, so I went among the health cranks--people who +experiment without license from the medical schools. Also, I +experimented upon myself, and now I know something about the human hair, +something entirely different from what the rich and successful +"consulting dermatologist" taught me, but which has kept me from +becoming entirely bald: + +First, the human hair is made by the body, and it is made, like +everything else in the body, out of the blood-stream. It is perfectly +true that the dandruff germ gets into the roots, and makes trouble, and +that the process of killing this germ can be helped by chemicals; but it +does not take a ten-dollar prescription, it only takes ten cents' worth +of borax and salt from the corner grocery. (Put a little into a saucer, +moisten it, rub it into the scalp, and wash it out again.) But +infinitely more important than this is the fact that healthy hair roots +are a product of healthy blood, and that unhealthy blood produces sick +hair roots, which cannot hold in the hair. Most important of all is the +fact that in order to make healthy hair roots the blood must flow fully +and freely to these hair roots; whereas I had been accustomed for many +hours every day of my life to clap around my scalp a tight band which +almost entirely stopped the circulation of the life-giving blood to my +sick hair roots. In other words, by wearing civilized hats, I was +literally starving my hair to death. + +As soon as I realized this I took off my civilized hat, and have never +worn one since. As a rule, I don't wear anything. On the few occasions +when I go into the city, I wear a soft cap. Now and then I experience +inconvenience from this--the elevator boy in some apartment house tells +me to come in by the delivery entrance, or the porter of a sleeping-car +will not let me in at all. I remember discussing these embarrassments +with Jack London, who went even further in his defiance of civilization, +and wore a soft shirt. It was his custom, he said, to knock down the +elevator boys and sleeping-car porters. I answered that that might be +all right for him, because he could do it; whereas I was reduced to the +painful expedient of explaining politely why I went about without the +customary symbols of my economic superiority. + +The "consulting dermatologist" had very solemnly and elaborately warned +me concerning the danger of moving my hair too violently, and thus +causing it to come out; but now my investigations brought out the fact +that moving the hair, that is, massaging the scalp, increases the flow +of blood to the hair roots, and further increases resistance to disease. +As for causing the hair to fall out, I discovered that the more quickly +you cause a hair to fall out, the greater is the chance of your getting +another hair. If a hair is allowed to die in the root, it kills that +root forever, but if it is pulled out before it dies, the root will make +a new hair. Every "beauty parlor" specialist knows this; she knows that +if a hair is pulled, it grows back bigger and stronger than ever, and so +to pull out hair is the last thing you must do if you want to get rid of +hairs! + +I know a certain poet, who happens to have been well-endowed with +physical graces by our mother nature. He finds it worth while to +preserve them--they being accessory to those amorous experiences which +form so large a part of the theme of poetry. Anyhow, this poet values +his beautiful hair, and you will see him sitting in front of his +fireplace, reading a book, and meanwhile his fingers run here and there +over his head, and he grabs a bunch of hair and pulls and twists it. He +has cultivated this habit for many years, and as a result his hair is as +thick and heavy as the "fuzzy-wuzzies" of Kipling's poem. It is a +favorite sport of this poet to lure some rival poet into a contest. He +will mildly suggest that they take hold of each other's hair and have a +tug of war. The rival poet, all unsuspecting, will accept the challenge, +and my friend will proceed to haul him all over the place, to the +accompaniment of howls of anguish from the victim, and howls of glee +from the victor, who has, of course, a scalp as tough as a rhinoceros +hide. + +I am not a poet, and it is not important that I should be beautiful, and +I have been too busy to remember to pull my hair; but by giving up tight +hats, and by limiting the amount of my overworking, I have managed to +keep what hair I had left when the hair specialist had got through with +me. I tell this anecdote at the beginning of my discussion of health, +because it illustrates so well the factors which appear in every case of +disease, and which you must understand in seeking to remedy the trouble. + +We have a phrase which has come down to us from the ancient Latins, +"vis medicatrix naturae," which means the healing power of nature. So +long ago men realized that it is our ancient mother who heals our +wounds, and not the physician. Out of this have grown the cults of +"nature cure" enthusiasts; and according to the fashion of men, they fly +to extremes just as unreasonable and as dangerous as those of the "pill +doctors" they are opposing. I have in mind a man who taught me probably +more than any other writer on health questions, and with whom I once +discussed the subject of typhoid, how it seemed to affect able-bodied +men in the prime of their physical being. This, of course, was contrary +to the theories of nature cure, and my friend had a simple way of +meeting the argument--he refused to believe it. He insisted that, as +with all other germ infections, it must be a question of bodily tone; no +germ could secure lodgment in the human body unless the body's condition +was reduced. + +"But how can you be sure of that?" I argued. "You know that if you go +into the jungle, you are not immune against the scorpion or the cobra or +the tiger. There is nothing in all nature that is safe against every +enemy. What possible right have you to assert that you are immune +against every enemy which can attack your blood-stream?" + +We shall find here, as we find nearly always, that the truth lies +somewhere between the extremes of two warring schools. Our race has been +existing for a long time in a certain environment, and its very +existence implies superiority to that environment. The weaklings, for +whom its hardships were too severe, were weeded out; hostile parasites +invaded their blood-stream and conquered and devoured them. But those +who survived were able to make in their blood-stream the substances +known as anti-bodies, the "opsonins," to help the white blood corpuscles +devour the germs. As the result of their victory, we carry those +anti-bodies in our system, which gives us immunity to those particular +diseases, or at any rate gives us the ability to have the diseases +without dying. Every time we go into a street car, we take into our +throat and lungs the germs of tuberculosis. Examination proves that we +carry around with us in our mouths the germs of all the common throat +and nose diseases, colds, bronchitis, tonsilitis. No matter what +precautions we might take, no matter if we were to gargle our throats +every few minutes, we could never get rid of such germs. And they wage +continual war upon the body's defenses; they batter in vain upon the +gates of our sound health. But take us to some new environment to which +we are not accustomed; take us to Panama in the old days of yellow +fever, or take us to Africa, and let the tsetse fly bite us, and infect +us with "sleeping sickness." Here are germs to which our systems are not +accustomed; and before them we are as helpless as the ancient +knights-at-arms, who had conquered everything in sight, and ruled the +continent of Europe for many hundreds of years, but were wiped off the +earth by a chemist mixing gunpowder. + +In the Marquesas Islands, in the South Seas, there lived a beautiful and +happy race of savages, believed to have been descended, long ages ago, +from Aryan stock. From the point of view of physical perfection, they +were an ideal race, living a blissful outdoor life, which you may read +about in Melville's "Typee," and in O'Brien's "White Shadows in the +South Seas." This race conformed to all the requirements of the nature +enthusiast. They went practically naked, their houses were open all the +time, they lived on the abundant fruits of the earth. To be sure, they +were cannibals, but this was more a matter of religious ceremony than of +diet. They ate their war captives, but this was only after battle, and +not often enough to count, one way or the other, in matters of health. +They had lived for uncounted ages in perfect harmony with their +environment; they were happy and free; and certainly, if such a thing +were possible to human beings, they should have been proof against +germs. But a ship came to one of these islands, and put ashore a sailor +dying of tuberculosis, and in a few years four-fifths of the population +of this island had been wiped out by the disease. What tuberculosis left +were finished by syphilis and smallpox, and today the Marquesans are an +almost extinct race. + +But there is another side to the argument--and one more favorable to the +nature cure enthusiast. We civilized men, by soft living, by +self-indulgence and lack of exercise, may reduce the tone of our body +too far below the standard which our ancestors set for us; and then the +common disease germs get us, then we have colds, sore throats, +tuberculosis. The nature cure advocate is perfectly right in saying that +there is no use treating such diseases; the thing is to restore the body +to its former tone, so that we may be superior to our normal environment +and its strains. + +You know the poem of the "One Hoss Shay," which was so perfectly built +in every part that it ran for fifty years and then collapsed all at once +in a heap. But the human body is not built that way. It always has one +or more places which are weaker than the others, and which first show +the effects of strain. In one person it will take the form of dyspepsia, +in another it will be headaches, in another colds, in another decaying +teeth, in another hardening of the arteries or stiffening of the joints. +But whatever the symptoms may be, the fundamental cause is always the +same, an abnormal condition of the blood-stream, and a consequent +lowering of the body's tone. Therefore, studying any disease and its +cure, you have first the emergency question, are there any germs lodged +in the body, and if so, how can you destroy them? As part of the +problem, you have to ask whether your blood-stream is normal, and if +not, what are the methods by which you can make it normal and keep it +so? Also you have to ask, what are the reasons why your trouble +manifests itself in this or that particular organ? Is there some +weakness or defect there, and can the defect be remedied, or can your +habits be changed so as to reduce the strain on that organ? Are there +any measures you can take to increase the flow of blood to that organ, +and to promote its activity? In the study of your health, you will find +that circumstances differ, and the importance of one factor or the other +will vary; but you will seldom find any problem in which all these +factors do not enter, and you will seldom find an adequate remedy unless +you take all the factors into consideration. + + + + +CHAPTER XIX + +EXPERIMENTS IN DIET + + (Narrates the author's adventures in search of health, and his + conclusions as to what to eat.) + + +Students of the body assure us that every particle of matter which +composes it is changed in the course of seven years. It is obvious that +everything that is a part of the body has at some time to be taken in as +food; so the problem of our diet today is the problem of what our body +shall consist of seven years from now, and probably a great deal sooner. + +I begin this discussion by telling my own personal experiences with +food. I am not going to recommend my diet for anyone else; because one +of the first things I have to say about the subject is that every human +individual is a separate diet problem. But I am going to try to +establish a few principles for your guidance, and more especially to +point out the commonest mistakes. I tell about my own mistakes, because +it happens that I know them more intimately. + +I was brought up in the South, where it is the custom of people to give +a great deal of time and thought to the subject of eating. Among the +people I knew it was always taken for granted that there should be at +least one person in the kitchen devoting all her time to the preparing +of delicious things for the family to eat. This person was generally a +negress, and, needless to say, she knew nothing about the chemistry of +foods, nothing about their constituents or nutritive qualities. All she +knew was about their taste; she had been trained to prepare them in ways +that tasted best, and was continually being advised and exhorted and +sometimes scolded by the ladies of the family on this subject. At the +table the family and the guests never failed to talk about the food and +its taste, and not infrequently the cook would be behind the door +listening to their comments; or else she would wait until after the +meal, for the report which somebody would bring her. + +In addition to this, the ladies of the family were skilled in what is +called "fancy cooking." They did not bother with the meats and +vegetables, but they mixed batter cakes, and made all kinds of elaborate +desserts, and exchanged these treasures and the recipes for them with +other ladies in the neighborhood. In addition to this, there were +certain periods of the week and of the year especially devoted to the +preparing and consuming of great quantities of foods. Once every seven +days the members of the family expressed their worship of their Creator +by eating twice as much as usual; and at another time they celebrated +the birth of their Redeemer by overeating systematically for a period of +two or three weeks. Needless to say, of course, the children brought up +in such an environment all had large appetites and large stomachs, and +their susceptibility to illness was recognized by the setting apart for +them of a whole classification of troubles--"children's diseases," they +were called. In addition to children's diseases, there were coughs and +colds and sore throats and pains in the stomach and constipation and +diarrhea, which the children shared with their adults. + +I had a little more than my share of all these troubles. Always a doctor +would be sent for, and always he was wise and impressive, and always I +was impressed. He gave me some pills or a bottle of liquid, a +teaspoonful every two hours, or something like that--I can hear the +teaspoon rattle in the glass as I write. I had a profound respect for +each and every one of those doctors. He was wisdom walking about in +trousers, and whenever he came, I knew that I was going to get well; and +I did, which proved the case completely. + +Then I grew up, and at the age of eighteen or nineteen became possessed +of a desire for knowledge, and took to reading and studying literally +every minute of the day and a good part of the night. I seldom let +myself go to sleep before two o'clock in the morning, and was always up +by seven and ready for work again. I did this for ten years or so, until +nature brought me to a complete stop. During these ten years I was a +regular experiment station in health; that is, I had every kind of +common ailment, and had it over and over again, so that I could try all +the ways of curing it, or failing to cure it, and keep on trying until I +was sure, one way or the other. I came recently upon a wonderful saying +by John Burroughs, which will be appreciated by every author. "This +writing is an unnatural business. It makes your head hot and your feet +cold, and it stops the digesting of your food." + +This trouble with my digestion began when I was writing my second novel, +camping out on a lonely island at the foot of Lake Ontario. I went to +see a doctor in a nearby town, and he talked learnedly about dyspepsia. +The cause of it, he said, was failure of the stomach to secrete enough +pepsin, and the remedy was to take artificial pepsin, obtained from the +stomach of a pig. He gave me this pig-pepsin in a bottle of red liquid, +and I religiously took some after each meal. It helped for a time; but +then I noticed that it helped less and less. I got so that a simple meal +of cold meat and boiled potatoes would stay in my stomach for hours, in +spite of any amount of the pig-pepsin; I would lie about in misery, +because I wanted to work, and my accursed stomach would not let me. + +All the time, of course, I was using my mind on this problem, groping +for causes. I found that the trouble was worse if I worked immediately +after eating. I found also that it was worse when I was writing books. +When I got sufficiently desperate, I would stop writing books and go off +on a hunting trip. I would tramp twenty miles a day over the mountains, +looking for deer, and I would come back at night too tired to think, and +in a week or two every trace of my trouble would be gone. So my life +regimen came to be--first the writing of a book, and then a hunting trip +to get over the effects of it. But as time went on, alas, I noticed that +the recuperation was more slow and less certain. The working times grew +shorter, and the hunting times grew longer, until finally I had got to a +point where I couldn't work at all; I would go to pieces in a few days +if I tried it. It was apparently the end of my stomach, and the end of +my sleeping, and the end of my writing books. My teeth were decaying, +not merely outside but inside; I would have abscesses, and most +frightful agonies to endure. I would lie awake all night, and it would +seem to me that I could feel my body going to pieces--an extremely +depressing sensation! + +I had been trying experiments all this time. I had been going to one +doctor after another, and had got to realize that the doctors only +treated symptoms; they treated the "diseases" when they appeared--but +nobody ever told you how to keep the "diseases" from appearing. Why +could there not be a doctor who would look you over thoroughly, and tell +you everything that was wrong with you, and how to set it right? A +doctor who would tell you exactly how to live, so that you might keep +well all the time! I was studying economics, and becoming suspicious of +my fellow man; it occurred to me that possibly it might be embarrassing +to a doctor, if he cured all his patients, and taught them how to live, +so that none of them would ever have to come to him again. It occurred +to me that possibly this might be the reason why "preventive medicine," +constructive health work, was getting so little attention from the +medical fraternity. + +Two things that plagued me were headache and constipation, and they were +obviously related. For constipation, the world had one simple remedy; +you "took something" every night or every morning, and thought no more +about it. My stout and amiable grandmother had drunk a glass of Hunyadi +water every morning for the last thirty or forty years, and that she +finally died of "fatty degeneration of the heart" was not connected with +this in the mind of anyone who knew her. As for the headaches, people +would tell you this, that, and the other remedy, and I would try +them--that is, unless they happened to be drugs. I was getting more and +more shy of drugs. I had some blessed instinct which saved me from +stimulants and narcotics. I had never used tea, coffee, alcohol or +tobacco, and in my worst periods of suffering I never took to putting +myself to sleep with chloral, or to stopping my headaches with +phenacetin. + +At the end of six or eight years of purgatory, I came upon a prospectus +of the Battle Creek Sanitarium. This seemed to me exactly what I wanted; +this was constructive, it dealt with the body as a whole. So I spent a +couple of months at the "San," and paid them something like a thousand +dollars to tell me all they could about myself. + +The first thing they told me was that meat-eating was killing me. It was +perfectly obvious, was it not, that meat is a horrible feeding place for +germs, that rotten meat is dreadfully offensive, and likewise digested +meat--consider the excreta of cats, for example! I listened solemnly +while Doctor Kellogg read off the numbers of billions of bacteria per +gram in the contents of the colon of a carnivorous person. It certainly +seemed proper that the author of "The Jungle" should be a vegetarian, so +I became one, and did my best to persuade myself that I enjoyed the +taste of the patent meat-substitutes which are served in hundred calory +portions in the big Sanitarium dining-room. + +There also I met Horace Fletcher, and learned to chew every particle of +food thirty-two times, and often more. I exercised in the Sanitarium +gymnasium, and watched the sterilized dancing--the men with the men and +the women with the women. I was patiently polite with the Seventh Day +Adventist religion, and laid in a supply of postage stamps on Friday +evening. Finally, and most important of all, I went once a day to the +"treatment rooms," and had my abdomen doctored alternately with hot +cloths and ice. By this means I kept up a flow of blood in the +intestinal tract, and stimulated these organs to activity; so my +constipation was relieved, and my headaches were less severe--so long as +I stayed at the Sanitarium, and was boiled and frozen once every day. +But when I left the Sanitarium, and abandoned the treatments, the +troubles began to return. Meantime, however, I had written a book in +praise of vegetarianism--a book which has got into the libraries, and +cannot be got out again! + +I went on to a new variety of health crank, the real "nature cure" +practitioners. Vegetarianism was not enough, they insisted; the evil had +begun long before, when man first ruined his food and destroyed its +nutritive value by means of fire. There was only one certain road to +health, and that was by the raw food route, the monkey and squirrel +diet. I had gone out to California for a winter's rest, and decided I +would give this plan a thorough trial. For five months I lived by +myself, and the only cooked food I ate was shredded wheat biscuit. For +the rest I lived on nuts and salads and fresh and dried fruits; and +during this period I enjoyed such health as I had never known in my life +before. I had literally not a single ailment. I was not merely well, but +bubbling over with health. I had a friend who said it cheered him up +just to see me walk down the street. + +I thought that it was entirely the raw food, and that I had solved the +problem forever; but I overlooked the fact that during those five months +I had done no hard brain work, no writing. I went back to writing again, +and things began to go wrong; my wonderful raw foods took to making +trouble in my stomach--and I assure you that until you try, you have no +idea the amount of trouble that can be made in your stomach by a load of +bananas and soaked prunes which has gone wrong! For a year or two I +agonized; I could not give up my wonderful raw food diet, because I had +always before me the vision of those months in California, and could +not understand why it was not that way again. + +But the time came when I would eat a meal of raw food, and for hours +afterwards my stomach would feel like a blown-up football. Then somebody +gave me a book by Dr. Salisbury on the subject of the meat diet. Of all +the horrible things in the world, a meat diet sounded to me the worst; I +had been a vegetable enthusiast for three years, and thought of eating +meat as you would think of cannibalism. But there has never been a time +in my life when I would not hear something new, and give it a trial if +it sounded well; so I read the books of Doctor Salisbury, which have +long been out of print, and have been curiously neglected by the medical +profession. Salisbury was a real pioneer, an experimenter. He wrote in +the days before the germ theory, and so missed his guess regarding +tuberculosis, but he perceived that most of the common diseases are +caused by dietetic errors, and he set to work to prove it. He showed +that hog cholera and army diarrhea are the same disease, and come from +the same cause. He took a squad of men and fed them on army biscuit for +two or three weeks, until they were nearly dead, and then he put them on +a diet of lean beef and completely cured them in a few days. He did this +same thing with one kind of food after another, and in each case he +would bring his men as near to death as he dared, and then he would cure +them. He showed that meat is the only food which contains all the +elements of nutrition, the only food upon which a person can live for an +unlimited period. As Salisbury said, "Beef is first, mutton is second, +and the rest nowhere." + +It was his idea that tuberculosis of the lungs is caused by spores of +fermenting starch clogging the minute blood vessels. He claimed that +there is an early stage of tuberculosis, in which the spores are +floating in the blood stream; he put large numbers of patients upon a +diet of lean beef, ground and cooked, and he cured them of tuberculosis, +and if one of them would break the diet and yield to a craving for +starch or sugar, Salisbury claimed that he could find it out an hour or +two later by examining a drop of their blood under the microscope. In +his books he described vividly the effects of an excess of starch and +sugar in the diet. He called it "making a yeast-pot of your stomach"; +and you can imagine how that hit my stomach, full of half digested +bananas and prunes! + +I tried the Salisbury diet, and satisfied myself of this one fact, that +lean meat is for brain-workers the most easily assimilated of all foods. +Salisbury claimed that you could not overeat on meat, but I do not +believe there is any food you cannot overeat on, nor do I believe that +anyone should try to live on one kind of food. We are by nature +omnivorous animals. Our digestive tracts are similar to those of hogs +and monkeys, which eat all varieties of food they can get. One of the +common errors of the nature cure enthusiast is to cite the monkey and +the squirrel as fruit and nut-eating animals, when the fact is that +monkeys and squirrels eat meat when they can get it, and the ardor with +which they go bird-nesting is evidence enough that they crave it. If +there is any race of man which is vegetarian, you will find that it is +from necessity alone. The beautiful South Sea Islanders, who are the +theme of the raw fooders' ecstasy, spend a lot of their time catching +fish, and sometimes they kill a pig, and celebrate the event precisely +as Christians celebrate the birth of their Redeemer. + +From this you may be able to guess my conclusions, as the result of much +painful blundering and experimenting. So far as diet is concerned, I +belong to no school; I have learned something from each one, and what I +have learned from a trial of them all is to be shy of extreme statements +and of hard and fast rules. To my vegetarian friends who argue that it +is morally wrong to take sentient life, I answer that they cannot go for +a walk in the country without committing that offense, for they walk on +innumerable bugs and worms. We cannot live without asserting our right +to subject the lower forms of life to our purposes; we kill innumerable +germs when we swallow a glass of grape juice, or for that matter a glass +of plain water. I shall be much surprised if the advance of science does +not some day prove to us that there are rudimentary forms of +consciousness in all vegetable life; so we shall justify the argument of +Mr. Dooley, who said, in reviewing "The Jungle," that he could not see +how it was any less a crime to cut off a young tomato in its prime, or +to murder a whole cradleful of baby peas in the pod! + +There is no question that meat-eating is inconvenient, expensive, and +dirty. I have no doubt that some day we shall know enough to be able to +find for every individual a diet which will keep him at the top of his +power, without the maintenance of the slaughter-house. But we do not +possess that knowledge at present; at least, I personally do not possess +it. I happen to be one of those individuals--there are many of +them--with whom milk does not agree; and if you rule out milk and meat, +you find yourself compelled to get a great deal of your protein from +vegetable sources, such as peas, beans and nuts. All these contain a +great deal of starch, and thus there is no way you can arrange your diet +to escape an excess of starch. Excess of starch, so my experience has +convinced me, is the deadliest of all dietetic errors. It is also the +commonest of errors, the cause, not merely of the common throat and nose +infections, but of constipation, and likewise of diarrhea, of anemia, +and thus, through the weakening of the blood stream, of all disorders +that spring from this source--decaying teeth and rheumatism, boils, bad +complexion, and tuberculosis. Starch foods are the cheapest, therefore +they form the common diet of the poor, and are responsible for the +diseases of undernourishment to which the poor are liable. + +On the other hand, of course, there are perfectly definite diseases of +overnourishment; high blood pressure, which culminates in apoplexy; +kidney troubles, which result from the inability of these organs to +eliminate all the waste matter that is delivered to them; fatty +degeneration of the heart, or of the liver, or any of the vital organs. +You may cause a headache by clogging the blood stream through +overeating, or you may cause it by eating small quantities of food, if +those foods are unbalanced, and do not contain the mineral elements +necessary to the making of normal blood. Whatever the trouble with your +health, it is my judgment that in two cases out of three you will find +it dates back to errors in diet. I do not think I exaggerate in saying +that a knowledge of what to eat and how much to eat is two-thirds of the +knowledge of how to keep yourself in permanent health. + + + + +CHAPTER XX + +ERRORS IN DIET + + (Discusses the different kinds of foods, and the part they play in + the making of health and disease.) + + +It is my purpose in this chapter to lay down a few general principles to +aid you in the practical problem of selecting the best diet for +yourself. But it must be made clear at the outset that there can be no +hard and fast rule. All human bodies are more or less alike, but on the +other hand all are more or less different. Modern civilization has given +very few bodies the chance to be perfect; nearly all have some weakness, +some abnormality, and need some special modification in diet to fit +their particular problem. The ideal in each case would be a complete +study of the individual system. Some day, no doubt, medical science will +analyze the digestive juices and the gland secretions and the +blood-stream of every human being, and say, you need a certain +percentage of starch and a certain percentage of protein; you need such +and such proportion of phosphorus and iron; you should avoid certain +acids--and so on. But at present we are devoting our science to the task +of killing and maiming other people, instead of enabling ourselves to +live in health and happiness; so it is that most of those who read this +book will be too poor to command the advice of a diet specialist. The +best you can do is to get a few general ideas and try them out, watching +your own body and learning its peculiarities. + +Human food contains three elements: proteins, fats and carbohydrates. +The proteins are the body-building material, and the foods which are +rich in proteins are lean meat, the white of eggs, milk and cheese, +nuts, peas and beans. A certain amount of this kind of food is needed by +the body. If it is missing, the body will gradually waste away. If too +much of it is taken, the body can turn it into energy-making material, +but this is a wasteful process, and the best evidence appears to be that +it is a strain upon the system. Experiments conducted by Professor +Chittenden of Yale have proven conclusively that men can live and +maintain body weight upon much less protein food than previous dietetic +standards had indicated. + +The fats are found in fat meats and dairy products, and in nuts, olives, +and vegetable oils. The body is prepared to digest and assimilate a +certain amount of fat, no one knows how much. I have found in my own +case that I require a great deal less than people ordinarily eat. I have +for many years maintained good health upon a diet containing no more fat +than one gets with lean meat once or twice a day. I never use butter or +olive oil, nor any fat in cooking. My reason for this is that fats are +the most highly concentrated form of food, and the easiest upon which to +overeat. Excess of fat is a cause, not merely of obesity, but also of +boils and pimples and "pasty" complexion, and other signs of a clogged +blood-stream. + +The third variety of food is the carbohydrates, and of these there are +two kinds, starches and sugars. Starch is the white material of the +grains and tubers; the principal food element of bread and cereals, +rice, potatoes, bananas, and many prepared substances such as +corn-starch, tapioca, farina and macaroni. Starchy foods compose +probably half the diet of the average human being. In my own case, they +compose about one-sixth, so you see to what extent my beliefs differ +from the common. Starch is not really necessary in the diet at all. I +have a friend who is subject to headaches, and finds relief from them by +a diet of meat, salads, and fresh fruits exclusively. The first thing +that excess of starch or sugar does is to ferment in the system, and +cause flatulence and gas. But strange as it may seem, if the excess of +starch is perfectly digested and assimilated into the system, the +condition may be worse yet, because you may have a great quantity of +energy-producing material, without the necessary mineral elements which +the body requires in the handling of it. + +If you cremate a human body and study the ashes chemically, you find a +score or more of mineral salts. You find these in the blood, and no +blood is normal and no body can be kept normal which does not contain +the right percentage of these elements. It is not merely that they are +needed to build bones and teeth; they are needed at every instant for +the chemistry of the cells. Every time you move a muscle, you fill the +cells of that muscle with a certain amount of waste matter. You may +prove how deadly this matter is by binding a tight cord about your arm, +and then trying to use the arm. We are only at the beginning of +understanding the subtle chemistry of the body; but this much we know, +the cells transform the waste products, and they are thrown out of the +system as ammonia, uric acid, etc.; and for this process the blood must +have a continual supply of many mineral salts. + +So vital are they, and so fatal to health is their absence, that it is +far better for you to eat nothing at all than to eat improperly balanced +foods, or foods which are deficient in the organic salts. You may prove +this to yourself by a simple experiment. Put two chickens in separate +pens, where nobody can feed them but yourself. Feed one of them on water +and white bread, or corn starch, or sugar, or any energy-making +substance which contains little of the mineral elements. Feed the other +chicken on plain water. You will find that the one which has the food +will quickly become droopy and sickly; its feathers will fall out, it +will have what in human beings would be known as headaches, colds, sore +throats, decaying teeth and boils. At the end of a couple of weeks it +will be a dead chicken. The one which you feed on water alone will not +be a happy chicken, neither will it be a fat chicken, but it will be a +live chicken, and a chicken without disease. I am going later on to +discuss the subject of fasting. For the present I will merely say that a +chicken which has nothing but water is living upon its own flesh, and +therefore has a meat diet, containing the mineral elements necessary to +the elimination of the fatigue poisons. + +I am going to try not to be dogmatic in this book, and not to say things +that I do not know. I confess to innumerable uncertainties about the +subject of diet; but one thing I think I do know, and that is that human +beings should eliminate absolutely from their food those modern +artificial products, which look so nice, and are so easy to handle, and +are put up in packages with pretty labels, and have been in some way +artificially treated to remove the wastes and impurities--including the +vital mineral salts. Among such food substances I include lard and its +imitations made from cottonseed oil, white flour, all the prepared and +refined cereals, polished rice, tapioca, farina, corn starch, and +granulated and powdered sugar. Any of these substances will kill a +chicken in a couple of weeks, and the only reason they take a longer +time to kill you is because you mix them with other kinds of foods. But +to the extent that you eat them, your diet is deficient; and do not +console yourself with the idea that the mineral elements will be made up +from other foods, because you don't know that, and nobody else knows it. +Nobody knows just how much of any particular organic salt the body +needs. All we know is that the primitive races, which ate natural foods, +enjoyed vigorous health, while the American people, who consume the +greatest proportion of the so-called "refined" foods, have the very best +dentists and the very worst teeth in the world. + +There are many kinds of sugar, found in the sugar-cane and the beet, and +in all fruits. Sugar may also be made from any form of starch; this is +glucose, which is put up in cans and sold as an imitation of maple +syrup. The ordinary granulated and powdered sugar is made by taking from +the natural syrup every trace of mineral elements; so I have no +hesitation in saying that the ordinary cane sugar and beet sugar of our +breakfast tables and our confectionery stores is not a food, but a slow +poison. The causes of the wonderful progress of American dentistry, +which is the marvel of the civilized world, are cane sugar, white flour, +and the frying-pan, each of which dietetic crimes I shall take up in +turn. + +We have the richest country in the world; we eat more food, probably by +50 per cent, and we waste more food, probably by 500 per cent, than any +other people in the world; and yet, go to any small farming community in +America, and what do you find? You find the teeth of the young children +rotting in their heads, and having to be pulled out before their second +teeth come. You find these second teeth rotting often before the age of +twenty. A friend of mine, who knows the American farmer, sums it up this +way: "He has two things that he requires if he is to be really +respectable and happy. First, he wants to get all the fireplaces in his +home boarded up, and all the windows nailed tight; and second, he wants +to get all his teeth out, and an artificial set installed. Out of the +farmers' wives in my neighborhood, not one in ten keeps her own teeth +until she is thirty." + +If you go to the Balkans, where the peasants live on sour milk, with +grains which they grind at home; or to southern Italy and Sicily, where +they live on cheese and black bread and olives; or among savage people, +where they hunt and fish and gather the natural fruits, you find old +men without a single decayed tooth. There must be some reason for this, +and the reason is found in our denatured grocery-store foods. The +farmer's wife will gather up her eggs and her butter and cheeses, and +take them to the store and bring back cans of lard and packages of +sugar. The farmer will sell his perfectly good wheat and corn meal, and +bring back in his wagon cases of "refined" cereal foods, for which he +has paid ten times the price of the grain! + +Dentists will tell you that the way candy injures the teeth is by +sticking to them and fermenting, forming acids, which destroy the tooth +structure. And that may be a part of the reason. But the principal +reason why the teeth decay is because the blood-stream is abnormal, and +is unable to keep up the repairs of the body. Your teeth are living +structures, just as much as any other part of you, and they will resist +decay if you supply them with the proper nourishment. + +You need sugar; you need a considerable quantity of it every day. Nature +provides this sugar in combination with the organic salts, and also with +the precious vitamines, whose function in the body we are only beginning +to investigate. All the mineral substances which give the color and +flavor to oranges, apples, peaches, grapes, figs, prunes, raisins--all +these you take out when you make sugar. Or perhaps you put in some +imitations of them, made from coal tar chemicals, and drink them at your +soda fountains! So little appreciation has the American farmer's wife of +natural fruits, that when she preserves them, she considers it necessary +to fill them full of cane sugar; in fact, she has a notion that they +won't keep unless she cooks them up with sugar! So snobbish are we +Americans about our eating, that we make the best of our foods into +bywords. We make jokes in our comic papers about the "boarding-house +prune"; and yet prunes and raisins are among the wholesomest foods we +have, and if we fed them to our children instead of cakes and candy and +coal-tar flavorings, our dental industry would rapidly decline. + +And the same thing is true of bread. When I was a boy, I thought I had +to have hot bread at least twice a day, and if I were called upon to eat +bread that was more than a day old, I felt that I was being badly abused +by life. I used to read fairy stories, in which something called "black +bread" was mentioned, something obscure and terrible; the symbol of +human misery was Cinderella sitting in the ashes and eating a crust of +dry "black bread." But now since I have studied diet, I have taken my +place with Cinderella. I can afford to buy whatever kind of bread I +want; I can have the best white bread, piping hot, three times a day, if +I want it; but what I eat three times a day is a crust of hard dry +"black bread." + +"Black bread" is the fairy story name for bread made of the whole grain. +It is eaten that way by the peasant because he has no patent milling +machinery at his disposal, to fan away the life-giving elements of his +food. Nearly all the mineral elements of the grain are contained in the +outer, dark-colored portion. The white part is almost pure starch; and +when you use white flour, you are not merely starving your blood-stream, +your bones, and your teeth, you are also depriving the digestive tract +of the rough material which it is accustomed to handle, and which it +needs to stimulate it to action. I am aware that whole grain products +are a trifle less easy of digestion, but we should not pamper and weaken +our digestive tract any more than we let our muscles get flabby for lack +of action. We should require our stomachs to handle the ordinary natural +foods, precisely as we accustom our body to react from cold water, and +to stand honest hard work. + +For ages the Japanese peasants have lived on rice, with a little dried +fish. Quite recently there began to spread throughout Japan a mysterious +disease known as beri-beri. It was especially prevalent in the army, and +so the scientists of Japan set out to discover the cause, and it proved +to be the modern practice of polishing rice, which takes off the outer +coating of the grain. Rice is one of the most wholesome of foods, if it +is eaten in the natural state; but in order to get it in that state in +this country, you have to find a special food store of the health +cranks, and have to pay a special price for it. You have to pay a higher +price for whole wheat bread--because ninety-nine people out of a hundred +are ignorant, and insist upon having their foodstuffs pretty to look at! + +Probably you have read sea stories, and know of the horrors of scurvy. +Scurvy and beri-beri are similar diseases, with a similar cause. The men +on the old sailing ships used to have to live on white biscuit and salt +meat, and they always knew that to recover from their gnawing illness, +they must get to port and get fresh vegetables and fruits, especially +onions and lemons, which contain the vitamines as well as the salts. But +you will see the modern housewife going into the grocery store, and +surveying the shelves of "package" goods, and in her ignorance picking +out the scurvy-making products, and frequently paying for them a much +higher price than for the health-making ones! + +Then, when she has got her white flour, and her cane sugar, and her +lard, she will take it home, and mix it up, and put it in the frying +pan, and serve it hot to her husband and children. Nature has so +constituted her husband and children that they digest starch before they +digest fat; that is to say, the starch is digested mainly in the +stomach, while the fat is digested mainly after the food has been passed +on into the small intestine. But by frying the starch before it is +eaten, the housewife carefully takes each grain of the starch and +protects it with a little covering of fat. Thus the digestive juices of +the stomach cannot get at the starch, and the starch goes down into the +small intestine a good part undigested. If some evil spirit, wishing to +make trouble for the human organism, had charge of the laying out of our +diet, he could hardly devise anything worse than that. And yet it would +be no exaggeration to say that the average American, especially the +average farmer, eats out of a frying-pan. If his potatoes have to be +warmed over, they go into the frying-pan; his precious batter-cakes and +doughnuts are cooked in a frying-pan, and all his precious hot breads +are mixed with lard. If it were not for the fact that you cannot broil a +beefsteak over a modern gas range, I would tell you that the first step +toward health for the average American would be to throw the frying-pan +out of the window, and to throw the cook-book after it. + +The whole modern art of cooking is largely a perversion; a product of +idleness, vanity, and sensuality. It is one of the monstrous growths +consequent upon our system of class exploitation. We have a number of +idle people with nothing to do but eat, and who demonstrate their +superiority to the rest of us by their knowledge of superior foods, and +superior ways of preparing them. They have the wealth of the world at +their disposal, also the services of their fellow man without limit, and +they set their fellow man to work to enable them to give elaborate +banquets, and to sit in solemn state and gorge themselves, and to have a +full account of their behavior published in the next morning's +newspapers. A great part of this perverse art we owe to what is called +the "ancient regime" in France--a regime which starved the French +peasantry until they were black skinned beasts hiding in caves and +hollow trees. So it comes about that our modern food depravity parades +itself in French names, and American snobbery requires of its devotees a +course in the French language sufficient to read a menu card. Needless +to say, this elaborate gastronomic art has been developed without any +relation to health, or any thought of the true needs of the body. It is +one of the products of the predatory system which we can say is absolute +waste. Having done my own cooking for the past twenty-five years, I make +bold to say that I can teach anybody all he needs to know about cooking +in one lesson of half an hour, and that the total amount of cooking +required for a large family can be done by one person in twenty minutes +a day. + +In the first place, a great many foods do not have to be cooked at all, +and are made less fit by cooking. In the next place, the only cooking +that is ever required is a little boiling, or in the case of meat, +roasting or broiling. In the next place, the art of combining foods in +cooking is a waste art, because no foods should be combined in cooking. +Every food has its own natural flavor, which is lost in combination, and +if anybody is unable to enjoy the natural flavors of simply cooked +foods, there is one thing to say to that person, and that is to wait +until he is hungry. Let him take a ten-mile walk in the open air, and he +will have more interest in his next meal. I am not a fanatic, and have +no desire to destroy the pleasures of life; I am recommending to people +that they should seek the higher pleasures of the intellect, and those +pleasures are not found in standing over a cook stove, nor in compelling +others to stand over a cook stove. Moreover, I know that the artificial +mixing of foods to tempt peoples' palates is one of the principal causes +of overeating, and therefore of ill health, and therefore of the +ultimate destruction of the pleasures of life. + +I went out from the world of cooks before I was twenty. I wanted to +write a book, and to be let alone while I was doing it. I lived by +myself, and found out about cooking by practical experience. On a few +occasions since then, I have lived in a house with a servant, and had +some cooking done for me, but it was always because somebody else +wanted it, and against my protest. In the last ten years we have had no +servant in our home, and because I want my wife to give her energy to +more important things than feeding me, I do my share of getting every +meal. We have worked out a system of housekeeping by which we get a meal +in five minutes, and when we finish it, it takes three minutes to clear +things away. + +If I tell you what I eat, please do not get the impression that I am +advising you to eat these same things. My diet consists of the foods +which I have found by long experience agree with me. There are many +other foods which are just as wholesome, but which I do not eat, either +because they don't happen to agree with me, or because I don't care for +them so much. I am fond of fruit, and eat more of that than of anything +else. It is not a cheap article of diet, but you can save a good deal if +you buy it in quantities, as I do. A little later I am going to discuss +the prices of foods. + +For breakfast I eat a slice of whole wheat bread, three good-sized +apples, stewed, and eight or ten dates. It takes practically no time to +prepare this breakfast. The bread has to be baked, of course, but this +is done wholesale; we buy four loaves at a time, and it is just as good +at the end of a couple of weeks as when we buy it. When I lived in the +world of cooks, I would call for apple sauce; which meant that somebody +had to pare apples, cut them up, stew them, mix them with sugar, grate a +little nutmeg over them, set them on ice, and serve them to me on a +glass dish, with a little pitcher of cream. But now what happens is that +I put a dozen apples in a big sauce-pan and let them simmer while I am +eating. We have a rule in our family that we do not do any cooking +except while we are eating, because if we try it at any other time of +the day, we get buried in a book or in a manuscript, and forget about it +until the smoke causes somebody in the street to summon the fire +department. So the apples for my breakfast were cooked during last +night's supper; and during the breakfast there will be some vegetable +cooking for lunch. + +At this lunch, which is my "square meal," I eat a large slice of +beefsteak, say a third of a pound. Jack London used to say that the only +man who could cook a beefsteak was the fireman of a railway locomotive, +because he had a hot, clean shovel. The best imitation you can get is a +hot, clean frying-pan; and when you are sure that it is hot, let it get +hotter. The whole secret of cooking meat is to keep the juices inside, +and to do that you must cook it quickly. When you slap it down on a hot +frying-pan, the meat is seared, and the juices stay inside, and if you +do not turn it over until it is almost ready to burn, you don't need to +cook it very long on the other side. That is the one secret of cooking +worth knowing; it doesn't cost anything, and saves time instead of +wasting it. As I have never found anybody else capable of learning it, I +reserve the cooking of the beefsteak as one of my family duties. + +To continue the lunch, a slice of whole wheat bread, and a large +quantity of some fresh salad, such as celery, or lettuce and tomatoes, +without dressing. For a part of this may be substituted a vegetable, one +or two beets or turnips, cooked during a previous meal, and warmed up in +a couple of minutes; and we do not throw away the tops of the turnips +and beets and celery, we put them on and cook them, and they serve for +the next day's meal. If you would eat a large quantity of such "greens" +once a day, you would escape many of the ills that your flesh is at +present heir to. Finally, for dessert, an orange and a small handful of +raisins, or one or two figs. + +The evening meal will be the same as the breakfast; except once in a +while when I am especially hungry, and want some meat. I am writing in +the winter season, so the fruits suggested are those available in +winter. The menu will be varied with every kind of fruit at the season +when it is cheapest and most easily obtained. The beefsteak will appear +at about three meals out of four; occasionally it will be replaced by +the lean meat of pork or mutton, or by fish. The bread may be replaced +by rice, or boiled potatoes, either white or sweet, and occasionally by +graham crackers. I know that these contain a little fat and sugar, but I +try not to be fanatical about my diet, and the rules I suggest do not +carry the death penalty. There was a time when I used to allow my +friends to make themselves miserable by trying to provide me with +special foods when they invited me to a meal, but now I tell them to +"forget it," and I politely nibble a little of everything, and eat most +of what I find wholesome; if there is nothing wholesome, I content +myself with the pretense of a meal. If I find myself in a restaurant, I +quite shamelessly get a piece of apple or pumpkin pie, omitting most of +the crust. As I don't go away from home more than once or twice a month, +I do not have to worry about such indulgence. The main thing is to +arrange one's home diet on sound lines, and learn to enjoy the simple +and wholesome foods, of which there is a great variety obtainable, and +at prices possible to all but the wretchedly poor. + +In conclusion, since everybody likes to have a feast now and then, I +specify that my diet regimen allows for holidays. Assuming that I am +your guest for a day, and that you wish to "blow" me, regardless of +expense, here will be the menu. Breakfast, some graham crackers, a bunch +of raisins, a can of sliced pineapple in winter, or a big chunk of +watermelon in summer. Dinner, or lunch, roast pork, a baked apple, a +baked sweet potato and some spinach. Supper, lettuce, dates, and a dish +of popcorn flavored with peanut butter. Try this next Christmas! + +P. S. After this book had been put into type, I chanced to be looking +over Herbert Quick's illuminating book, "On Board the Good Ship Earth." +Discussing the importance of certain organic salts to the body, Dr. +Quick states: "Animals have been fed, as an experiment, on foods +deficient in phosphorus. For a while they seemed to do well. Then they +collapsed. It takes only three months of a ration without phosphorus to +wreck an animal. Individual creatures were killed after a month of this +diet, and it was found that the flesh was taking the phosphate--for the +phosphorus exists in the body in that form--from the bones to supply its +need. In other words, the body was eating its own bones! When this +process had robbed the bones to the limit, the collapse came, and the +animal could never recover." + + + + +CHAPTER XXI + +DIET STANDARDS + + (Discusses various foods and their food values, the quantities we + need, and their money cost.) + +I think there is no more important single question about health than the +question of how much food we should eat. It is one about which there is +a great deal of controversy, even among the best authorities. We shall +try here for a common-sense solution. At the outset we have to remind +ourselves of the distinction we tried to draw between nature and man. To +what extent can civilized man rely upon his instincts to keep him in +perfect health? + +Let us begin by considering the animals. How is their diet problem +solved? Horses and cattle in a wild state are adjusted to certain foods +which they find in nature, and so long as they can find it, they have no +diet problem. Man comes, and takes these animals and domesticates them; +he observes their habits, and gives to them a diet closely approaching +the natural one, and they get along fairly well. But suppose the man, +with his superior skill in agriculture, taking wild grain and planting +it, reaping and threshing it by machinery, puts before his horse an +unlimited quantity of a concentrated food such as oats, which the horse +can never get in a natural state--will that horse's instincts guide it? +Not at all. Any horse will kill itself by overeating on grain. + +I have read somewhere a clever saying, that a farm is a good place for +an author to live, provided he can be persuaded not to farm it. But once +upon a time I had not heard that wise remark, and I owned and tried to +run a farm. I had two beautiful cows of which I was very proud, and one +morning I woke up and discovered that the cows had got into the pear +orchard and had been feeding on pears all night. In a few hours they +both lay with bloated stomachs, dying. A farmer told me afterwards that +I might have saved their lives, if I had stuck a knife into their +stomachs to let out the gas. I do not know whether this is true or not. +But my two dead cows afford a perfect illustration of the reason why +civilized man cannot rely upon his instincts and his appetites to tell +him when he has had enough to eat. He can only do this, provided he +rigidly restricts himself to the foods which he ate in the days when his +teeth and stomach and bowels were being shaped by the process of natural +selection. If he is going to eat any other than such strictly natural +foods, he will need to apply his reason to his diet schedule. + +In a state of nature man has to hunt his food, and the amount that he +finds is generally limited, and requires a lot of exercise to get. +Explorers in Africa give us a picture of man's life in the savage state, +guided by his instincts and very little interfered with by reason. The +savages will starve for long periods, then they will succeed in killing +a hippopotamus or a buffalo, and they will gorge themselves, and nearly +all of them will be ill, and several of them will die. So you see, even +in a state of nature, and with natural foods, restraint is needed, and +reason and moral sense have a part to play. + +What do reason and moral sense have to tell us about diet? Our bodily +processes go on continuously, and we need at regular intervals a certain +quantity of a number of different foods. The most elementary experiment +will convince us that we can get along, maintain our body weight and our +working efficiency upon a much smaller quantity of food than we +naturally crave. Civilized custom puts before us a great variety of +delicate and appetizing foods, upon which we are disposed to overeat; +and we are slow observers indeed if we do not note the connection +between this overeating and ill health. So we are forced to the +conclusion that if we wish to stay well, we need to establish a +censorship over our habits; we need a different diet regimen from the +haphazard one which has been established for us by a combination of our +instincts with the perversions of civilization. + +Up to a few years ago, it was commonly taken for granted by authorities +on diet that what the average man actually eats must be the normal thing +for him to eat. Governments which were employing men in armies, and at +road building, and had to feed them and keep them in health, made large +scale observations as to what the men ate, and thus were established the +old fashioned "diet standards." They are expressed in calories, which is +a heat unit representing the quantity of fuel required to heat a certain +small quantity of water a certain number of degrees. In order that you +may know what I am talking about, I will give a rough idea of the +quantity of the more common foods which it takes to make 100 calories: +one medium sized slice of bread, a piece of lean cooked steak the size +of two fingers, one large apple, three medium tablespoonfuls of cooked +rice or potatoes, one large banana, a tablespoonful of raisins, five +dates, one large fig, a teaspoonful of sugar, a ball of butter the size +of your thumbnail, a very large head of lettuce, three medium sized +tomatoes, two-thirds of a glass of milk, a tablespoonful of oil. You +observe, if you compare these various items, how little guidance +concerning food is given by its bulk. You may eat a whole head of +lettuce, weighing nearly a pound, and get no more food value than from a +half ounce of olive oil which you pour over it. You may eat enough lean +beefsteak to cover your plate, and you will not have eaten so much as a +generous helping of butter. A big bowl of strawberries will not count +half so much as the cream and sugar you put over them. So you may +realize that when you eat olive oil, butter, cream, and sugar, you are +in the same danger as the horse eating oats, or as my two cows in the +pear orchard; and if some day a surgeon has to come and stick a knife +into you, it may be for the same reason. + +The old-fashioned diet standards are as follows: Swedish laborers at +hard work, over 4,700 calories; Russian workmen at moderate work, German +soldiers in active service, Italian laborers at moderate work, between +3,500 and 3,700 calories; English weavers, nearly 3,500 calories; +Austrian farm laborers, over 5,000 calories. Some twenty years ago the +United States government made observations of over 15,000 persons, and +established the following, known as the "Atwater standards": men at very +hard muscular work, 5,500 calories; men at moderately active muscular +work, 3,400 calories; men at light to moderate muscular work, 3,050 +calories; men at sedentary, or women at moderately active work, 2,700 +calories. + +In the last ten or fifteen years there has arisen a new school of +dietetic experts, headed by Professors Chittenden and Fisher of Yale +University. Professor Chittenden has published an elaborate book, "The +Nutrition of Man," in which he tells of long-continued experiment upon a +squad of soldiers and a group of athletes at Yale University, also upon +average students and professors. He has proved conclusively that all +these various groups have been able to maintain full body weight and +full working efficiency upon less than half the quantity of protein food +hitherto specified, and upon anywhere from one-half to two-thirds the +calory value set forth in the former standards. + +When I first read this book, I set to work to try its theories upon +myself. During the five or six months that I lived on raw food, I took +the trouble to weigh everything that I ate, and to keep a record. It is, +of course, very easy to weigh raw foods exactly, and I found that I +lived an active life and kept physical health upon slightly less than +2,500 calories a day. I have set this as my standard, and have +accustomed myself to follow it instinctively, and without wasting any +thought upon it. Sometimes I fall from grace; for I still crave the +delightful cakes and candies and ice cream upon which I was brought up. +I always pay the penalty, and know that I will not get back to my former +state of health until I skip a meal or two, and give my system a chance +to clean house. The average man will find the regimen set forth in this +book austere and awe-inspiring; I do not wish to pose as a paragon of +virtue, so perhaps I should quote a sarcastic girl cousin, who remarked +when I was a boy that the way to my heart was with a bag of +ginger-snaps. I live in the presence of candy stores and never think of +their existence, but if someone brings candy into the house and puts it +in front of me, I have to waste a lot of moral energy in letting it +alone. A few years ago I had a young man as secretary who discovered +this failing of mine, and used to afford himself immense glee by buying +a box of chocolates and leaving it on top of my desk. I would give him +back the box--with some of the chocolates missing--but he would persist +in "forgetting it" on my desk; he would hide and laugh hilariously +behind the door, until my wife discovered his nefarious doings, and +warned me of them. + +Professor Chittenden states quite simply the common sense procedure in +the matter of food quantity. Find out by practical experiment what is +the very least food upon which you can do your work without losing +weight. That is the correct quantity for you, and if you are eating +more, you certainly cannot be doing your body any good, and all the +evidence indicates that you are doing it harm. You need not have the +least fear in making this experiment that you will starve yourself. +Later on, in a chapter on fasting, I shall prove to you that you carry +around with you in your body sufficient reserve of food to keep you +alive for eighty or ninety days; and if you draw on a small quantity of +this you do not do yourself the slightest harm. Cut down the amount of +your food; eat the bulky foods, which contain less calory value, and +weigh yourself every day, and you will be surprised to discover how much +less you need to eat than you have been accustomed to. + +One of the things you will find out is that your stomach is easily +fooled; it is largely guided by bulk. If you eat a meal consisting of a +moderate quantity of lean meat, a very little bread, a heaping dish of +turnip greens, and a big slice of watermelon, you will feel fully +satisfied, yet you will not have taken in one-third the calory value +that you would at an ordinary meal with gravies and dressings and +dessert. The bulky kind of food is that for which your system was +adapted in the days when it was shaped by nature. You have a large +stomach, many times as large as you would have had if you had lived on +refined and concentrated foods such as butter, sugar, olive oil, cheese +and eggs. You have a long intestinal tract, adapted to slowly digesting +foods, and to the work of extracting nutrition from a mass of roughage. +You have a very large lower bowel, which Metchnikoff, the Russian +scientist, one of the greatest minds who ever examined the problems of +health, declares a survival, the relic of a previous stage of evolution, +and a source of much disease. The best thing you can do with that lower +bowel is to give it lots of hay, as it requires; in other words, to eat +the salads and greens which contain cellulose material. This contains no +food value, and does not ferment, but fills the lower bowel and +stimulates it to activity. + +If you eat too much food, three things may happen. First, it may not be +digested, and in that case it will fill your system with poisons. +Second, it may be assimilated, but not burned up by the body. In that +case it has to be thrown out by the kidneys or the sweat glands, and +this puts upon these organs an extra strain, to which in the long run +they may be unequal. Or third, the surplus material may be stored up as +fat. This is an old-time trick which nature invented to tide you over +the times when food was scarce. If you were a bear, you would naturally +want to eat all you could, and be as fat as possible in November, so +that you might be able to hunt your prey when you came out from your +winter's sleep in April. But you are not a bear, and you expect to eat +your regular meals all winter; you have established a system of +civilization which makes you certain of your food, and the place where +you keep your surplus is in the bank, or sewed up in the mattress, or +hidden in your stocking. In other words, a civilized man saves money, +and the habit of storing globules of grease in the cells of his body is +a survival of an old instinct, and a needless strain upon his health. +Not merely does the fat man have to carry all the extra weight around +with him, but his body has to keep it and tend it; and what are the +effects of this is fully shown by life insurance tables. People who are +five or ten per cent over weight have five or ten per cent more chance +of dying all the time, while people who are five or ten per cent under +weight have five or ten per cent more than the average of life +expectation. There is no answer to these figures, which are the result +of the tabulation of many hundreds of thousands of cases. The meaning of +them to the fat person is to put himself on a diet of lean meat, green +vegetables and fresh fruits, until he has brought himself down, not +merely to the normal fatness of the civilized man, but to the normal +leanness of the athlete, the soldier on campaign, and the student who +has more important things to think about than stuffing his stomach. + +There is, of course, a certain kind of leanness which is the result of +ill health. There are wasting diseases; tuberculosis, for example, and +anemia. There are people who worry themselves thin, and there are a few +rare "spiritual" people, so-called, who fade away from lack of +sufficient interest in their bodies. That is not the kind of leanness +that I mean, but the active, wiry leanness, which sometimes lives a +hundred years. Nearly always you will find that such people are spare +eaters; and you will find that our ideal of rosy plumpness, both for +adults and children, is a wholly false notion. We once had in our home +as servant an Irish girl, who was what is popularly called "a picture of +health," with those beautiful flaming cheeks that Irish and English +women so often have. She was in her early twenties, and nobody who knew +her had any idea but that her health was perfect. But one morning she +was discovered in bed with one side paralyzed, and in a couple of weeks +she was dead with erysipelas. The color in her cheeks had been nothing +but diseased blood vessels, overloaded with food material; and with the +blood in that condition, one of the tiny vessels in the brain had become +clogged. + +In the same way I have seen children, two or three years old, plump and +rosy, and considered to be everything that children should be; but +pneumonia would hit them, and in two or three days they would be at +death's door. I do not mean that children should be kept hungry; on the +contrary, they should have four or five meals a day, so that they do not +have a chance to become too hungry. But at those meals they should eat +in great part the bulky foods, which contain the natural salts needed +for building the body. If a child asks for food, you may give it an +apple, or you may give it a slice of bread and butter with sugar on it. +The child will be equally well content in either case; but it is for +you, with your knowledge of food values, to realize that the bread with +butter and sugar contains two or three times as much nutriment as the +apple, but contains practically none of the precious organic salts which +will make the child's bones and teeth. + +So far I have discussed this subject as if all foods grew on bushes +outside your kitchen door, and all you had to do was to go and pick off +what you wanted. But as a matter of fact, foods cost money, and under +our present system of wage slavery, the amount of money the average +person can spend for food is strictly limited. In a later book I am +going to discuss the problem of poverty, its causes and remedies. All +that I can do here is to tell you what foods you ought to have, and if +society does not pay you enough for your work to enable you to buy such +foods, you may know that society, is starving you, and you may get busy +to demand your rights as human beings. Meantime, however, such money as +you do have, you want to spend wisely, and the vast majority of you +spend it very unwisely indeed. + +In the first place, a great many of the simplest and most wholesome +foods are cheap--often because people do not know enough to value them. +We insist upon having the choice cuts of meats, because they are more +tender to the teeth, but the cheaper cuts are exactly as nutritious. We +insist upon having our meats loaded with fat, although fatness is an +abnormal condition in an animal, and excess of fat is a grave error in +diet. I live in a country where jack rabbits are a pest, and in the +market they sell for perhaps one-fourth the cost of beef, and yet I can +hardly ever get them, because people value them so little as food; they +prefer the meat of a hog which has been wallowing in a filthy pen, and +has been deliberately made so fat that it could hardly walk! + +I have already spoken of prunes, a much despised and invaluable food. +All the dried fruits are rich in food values, and if we could get them +untreated by chemicals, they would be worth their cost. I was brought up +to despise the cheaper vegetables, such as cabbage and turnips; I never +tasted boiled cabbage until I was forty, and then to my great surprise I +made the discovery that it is good. Raw cabbage is as valuable as any +other salad; it is a trifle harder to digest for some people, but I do +not believe in pampering the stomach. Both potatoes and rice are cheap +and wholesome, if only we would get unpolished rice, and if we would +leave the skins on the potatoes until after they are cooked. Nearly all +the mineral salts of the potato are just under the outer skin, and are +removed by the foolish habit of peeling them. + +The prices of food differ so widely at different seasons and in +different parts of the world, that there is not much profit in trying to +figure how cheaply a person can live. I have found that I spend for the +diet I have indicated here, from sixty to eighty cents a day. I do not +buy any fancy foods, but on the other hand, I do not especially try to +economize; I buy what I want of the simple everyday foods in their +season. Most everyone will find that it is a good business proposition +to buy the foods which he needs to keep in health. If the average +workingman would add up the money he spends, not merely in the +restaurants, but in the candy stores, the drug stores, the tobacco +stores, and the offices of doctors and dentists, he would find, I think, +that he could afford to buy himself the necessary quantity of wholesome +natural foods. For a family of three, in the place where I live, enough +of these foods can be purchased for a dollar a day, and this is about +one-fourth what common labor is being paid, and one-eighth of what +skilled labor is being paid. I will specify the foods: a pound and a +half of shoulder steak, a loaf of whole wheat bread or a box of shredded +wheat biscuit, a head of cabbage, a pound of prunes, and four or five +pounds of apples. + +There are many ways of saving in the purchase of food if you put your +mind upon it. If you are buying prunes, you may pay as high as fifty +cents or a dollar a pound for the big ones, and they are not a bit +better than the tiny ones, which you can buy for as low as eight cents a +pound in bulk. When bread is stale, the bakers sell it for half price, +despite the fact that only then has it become fit to eat. If you buy +canned peaches, you will pay a fancy price for them, and they will be +heavy with cane sugar; but if you inquire, you find what are known as +"pie peaches," put up in gallon tins without sugar, and at about half +the price. The butcher will sell you what he calls "hamburg steak" at a +very low price, and if you let him prepare it out of your sight, he will +fill it with fat and gristle; but let him make some while you watch, and +then you have a very good food. One of my diet rules is that I do not +trust the capitalist system to fix me up any kind of mixed or ground or +prepared foods. I have not eaten sausage since I saw it made in Chicago. + +Also there is something to know about the cooking of foods, since it is +possible to take perfectly good foods and spoil them by bad cooking. +Once upon a time our family discovered a fireless cooker, and thought +that was a wonderful invention for an absent-minded author and a wife +who is given to revising manuscripts. But recent investigations which +have been made into the nature of the "vitamines," food ferments which +are only partly understood, suggest that prolonged cooking of food may +be a great mistake. The starch has to be cooked in order to break the +cell walls by the expansion of the material inside. Twenty minutes will +be enough in the case of everything except beans, which need to be +cooked four or five hours. Meat should be eaten rare, except in the case +of pork, which harbors a parasite dangerous to the human body; therefore +pork should always be thoroughly cooked. The white of eggs is made less +digestible by boiling hard or frying. Eggs should never be allowed to +boil; put them on in cold water, and take them off as soon as the water +begins to boil. It is not necessary to cook either fresh fruit or dried. +The dried fruits may be soaked and eaten raw, but I find that several +fruits, especially apples and pears, do not agree with me well if they +are eaten raw, so I stew them for fifteen or twenty minutes. I have no +objection to canned fruits and vegetables, provided one takes the +trouble in opening them to make sure there is no sign of spoiling. If +you put up your own fruits, do not put in any sugar. All you have to do +is to let them boil for a few minutes, and to seal them tightly while +they are boiling hot. The whole secret of preserving is to exclude the +air with its bacteria. + +If you live on a farm, you will have no trouble in following the diet +here outlined, for you can produce for yourselves all the foods that I +have recommended; only do not make the mistake of shipping out your best +foods, and taking back the products of a factory, just because you have +read lying advertisements about them. Take your own wheat and oats and +corn to the mill, and have it ground whole, and make your own breads and +cereals. Try the experiment of mixing whole corn meal with water and a +little salt, and baking it into hard, crisp "corn dodgers." I do not eat +these--but only because I cannot buy them, and have no time to make +them. + +Another common article of food which I do not recommend is salted and +smoked meats. I do not pretend to know the effects of large quantities +of salt and saltpetre and wood smoke upon the human system, but I know +that Dr. Wiley's "poison squad" proved definitely that a number of these +inorganic minerals are injurious to health, and I prefer to take fresh +meat when I can get it. I use a moderate quantity of common salt on meat +and potatoes, because there seems to be a natural craving for this. I +know that many health enthusiasts insist that I am thus putting a strain +on my kidneys, but I will wait until these health enthusiasts make clear +to me why deer and cattle and horses in a wild state will travel many +miles to a salt-lick. I have learned that it is easy to make plausible +statements about health, but not so easy to prove them. For example, I +was told that it is injurious to drink water at meals, and for years I +religiously avoided the habit; but it occurred to some college professor +to find out if this was really true, and he carried on a series of +experiments which proved that the stomach works better when its contents +are diluted. The only point about drinking at meals is that you should +not use the liquid to wash down your food without chewing it. + +I can suggest two other ways by which you may save money on food. One is +by not eating too much, and another is by eating all that you buy. The +amount of food that is wasted by the people of America would feed the +people of any European nation. The amount of food that is thrown out +from any one of our big American leisure class hotels would feed the +children of a European town. I think it may fairly be described as a +crime to throw into the garbage pail food which might nourish human +life. In our family we have no garbage pail. What little waste there is, +we burn in the stove, and my wife turns it into roses. It consists of +the fat which we cannot help getting at the butcher's, and the bones of +meat, and the skins of some fruits and vegetables. It would never enter +into our minds to throw out a particle of bread, or meat, or other +wholesome food. If we have something that we fear may spoil, we do not +throw it out, but put it into a saucepan and cook it for a few minutes. +If you will make the same rule in your home, you will stop at least that +much of the waste of American life; and as to the big leisure class +hotels, and the banquet tables of the rich--just wait a few years, and I +think the social revolution will attend to them! + + + + +CHAPTER XXII + +FOODS AND POISONS + + (Concludes the subject of diet, and discusses the effect upon the + system of stimulants and narcotics.) + + +A few years ago there died an old gentleman who had devoted some twenty +years of his life to teaching people to chew their food. Horace Fletcher +was his name, and his ideas became a fad, and some people carried them +to comical extremes. But Fletcher made a real discovery; what he called +"the food filter." This is the automatic action of the swallowing +apparatus, whereby nature selects the food which has been sufficiently +prepared for digestion. If you chew a mouthful of food without ever +performing the act of swallowing, you will find that the food gradually +disappears. What happens is that all of it which has been reduced to a +thin paste will slip unnoticed down your throat, and you may go on +putting more food into your mouth, and chewing, and can eat a whole meal +without ever performing the act of swallowing. Fletcher claimed that +this is the proper way to eat, and that you can train yourself to follow +this method. I have tried his idea and adopted it. One of my diet rules, +to which there is no exception, is that if I haven't the time to chew my +food properly, I haven't the time to eat; I skip that meal. + +The habit of bolting food is a source of disease. To be sure, the +carnivorous animals bolt their food, but they are tougher than we are, +and do not carry the burden of a large brain and a complex nervous +system. If you swallow your meals half chewed, and wash them down with +liquids, you may get away with it for a while, but some day you will pay +for it with dyspepsia and nervous troubles. And the same thing applies +to your habit of jumping up from meals and rushing away to work, whether +it be work of the muscles, or of brain and nerves. Proper digestion +requires the presence of a quantity of blood in the walls of the stomach +and digestive tract. It requires the attention of your subconscious +mind, and this means rest of muscles and brain centers. If you cannot +rest for an hour after meals, omit that meal, or make it a light one, of +fruit juices, which are almost immediately absorbed by the stomach, and +of salads, which do not ferment. You may rest assured that it will not +hurt you to skip a meal, and make up for it when you have time to be +quiet. I have been many times in my life under very intense and long +continued nervous strain; for example, during the Colorado coal strike, +I led a public demonstration which kept me in a state of excitement all +the day and a good part of the night several weeks. During this period I +ate almost nothing; a baked apple and a cup of custard would be as near +as I would go to a meal, and as a result I came through the experience +without any injury whatever to my health. I lost perhaps ten pounds in +weight, but that was quickly made up when I settled back to a normal way +of life. + +I have been on camping trips when I had a great deal of hard work to do, +carrying a canoe long distances on my back, or paddling it forty miles a +day. On the mornings of such a trip I have seen a guide cook himself an +elaborate breakfast of freshly baked bread, bacon, and even beans, and +make a hearty meal and then go straight to work. My meal, on the +contrary, would consist of a small dish of stewed prunes, or perhaps +some huckleberries or raspberries, if they could be found. I will not +say that I could do as much as the guide, because he was used to it, and +I was not. But I can say this--if I had eaten his breakfast at the start +of the day, I would have been dead before night; and I mean the word +"dead" quite literally. I know a man who started to climb Whiteface +mountain in the Adirondacks. He climbed half way, and then ate lunch, +which consisted of nine hard boiled eggs. Then he started to climb the +rest of the mountain, and dropped dead of acute indigestion. + +There are few poisons which can affect the system more quickly, or more +dangerously, than a mass of food which is not digested. The stomach is +an ideal forcing-house for the breeding of bacteria. It provides warmth +and moisture, and you, in your meal, provide the bacteria and the +material upon which they thrive. Under normal conditions, the stomach +pours out a gastric juice which kills the bacteria; but let this gastric +juice for any reason be lacking--because your nervous energy has gone +somewhere else, or because your blood-stream, from which the gastric +juice must be made, has been drawn away to the muscles by hard labor; +then you have a yeast-pot, with great quantities of gases and poisons. +In acute cases the results are evident enough: violent pains and +convulsions, followed by coma and the turning black of the body. But +what you should understand is that you may produce a milder case of such +poisoning, and may do it day after day habitually, and little by little +your vital organs will be weakened by the strain. + +It does not make any difference at what hour of the twenty-four you take +the great bulk of your food. It is one of the commonest delusions that +you get some strengthening effect from your food immediately, and must +have this strength in order to do hard work. To be sure, there are +substances, such as grape-sugar, which require practically no digesting; +you can hold them in the mouth, and they will be digested by the saliva, +and absorbed at once into the blood-stream. But unless you have been +starved for a long period you do not need to get your strength in this +rush fashion. If you ate your normal meals on the previous day, your +blood-stream is fully supplied with nutriment which has been put through +a long process of preparation, and you can get up in the morning and +work all day, if necessary, upon what is already in your system. To be +sure, you may feel hungry, and even faint, but that is merely a matter +of habit; your system is accustomed to taking food and expects it. But +if you are a laborer doing hard work, you can easily train yourself to +eat a light meal in the morning, and another light meal at noon, and to +eat a hearty meal when your work is done and you can rest. Two light +meals and a hearty meal are all that any system needs, and you can prove +it to yourself by trying it, and watching your weight once a week. + +I have tried many experiments, and the conclusion to which I have come +is that there is no virtue in any particular meal-hours or any +particular number of meals. For several years I tried the experiment of +two meals a day. I was living a retired life, and had little contact +with the world, and I would make a hearty meal at ten o'clock in the +morning, and another at five in the afternoon. But later on I found that +inconvenient, and now I take a light breakfast, and two moderate-sized +meals at the conventional hours of lunch and dinner. I can arrange my +own time, so after meal times is when I get my reading done. Sometimes, +when I am tired, I feel sleepy after meals, but I have learned not to +yield to this impulse. I do not know how to explain this; I have +observed that animals sleep after eating, and it appears to be a natural +thing to do; but I know that if I go to sleep after a meal, nature makes +clear to me that I have made a mistake, and I do not repeat it. I never +eat at night, and always go to bed on an empty stomach, so I am always +hungry when I open my eyes in the morning. I never know what it is not +to be hungry at meal times, and my habits are so regular that I could +set my watch by my stomach. + +Another common habit which is harmful is eating between meals. I have +known people who are accustomed to nibble at food nearly all the time. +Shelley records that he tried it as an experiment, thinking it might be +a convenient way to get digestion done--but he found that it did not +work. The stomach is apparently meant to work in pulses; to do a job of +digesting, and then to rest and accumulate the juices for another job. +It will accustom itself to a certain regime, and will work accordingly, +but if, when it has half digested a load of food, you pile more food in +on top, you make as much trouble as you would make in your kitchen if +you required your cook to prepare another meal before she has cleaned up +after the last one. Three times a day is enough for any adult to eat. +Children require to eat oftener, because their bodies are more active, +and they not merely have to keep up weight, but to add to it. The +simplest way to arrange matters with children is to give them three good +meals at the hours when adults eat, and then to give them a couple of +pieces of fruit between breakfast and lunch, and again between lunch and +supper. I have never seen a child who would not be satisfied with this, +when once the habit was established. + +I have already spoken of the cooking and serving of food. I consider +that the "gastronomic art," as it is pompously called, is ninety-nine +per cent plain rubbish. To be sure, if foods are appetizingly prepared, +and look good and smell good and taste good, they will cause the gastric +juices to flow abundantly, as the Russian scientist Pavlov has +demonstrated by practical experiment with the stomach-pump. But I know +without any stomach-pump that the best thing to make my gastric juices +flow is hard work and a spare diet. When I come home from five sets of +tennis, and have a cold shower and a rub-down, my gastric juices will +flow for a piece of cold beefsteak and a cold sweet potato, quite as +well as for anything that is served by a leisure class "chef." Needless +to say, I want food to be fresh, and I want it to be clean, but I have +other things to do with my time and money than to pamper my appetites +and encourage food whims. + +If you have a grandmother, or ever had one, you know what grandmothers +tell you about "hot nourishing food"; but I have tried the experiment, +and satisfied myself that there is absolutely no difference in +nourishing qualities between hot food and cold food. If you chew your +food sufficiently, it will all be ninety-eight and six-tenths degree +food when it gets to your stomach, and that is the way your stomach +wants it. Of course, if you have been out in a blizzard, and are +chilled, and want to restore the body temperature, a hot drink will be +one of the quickest ways, and if the emergency is extreme, you may even +add a stimulant. On the other hand, if you are suffering from heat, it +is sensible to cool your body by a cold drink. But you should use as +much judgment with yourself as you would with a horse, which you do not +permit to drink a lot of cold water when he is heated up, and is going +into his stall to stand still. + +I have mentioned the word "stimulants," and this opens a large subject. +There are drugs which affect the body in two different ways: some excite +the nerves, and through the nerves the heart and blood-stream, to more +intense activity; others have the effect of deadening the nerves, and +dulling the sense of exhaustion and pain. One of these groups is called +stimulants, and the other is called narcotics; but as a matter of fact +the stimulants are really narcotics, because they operate by dulling the +nerves whose function it is to prevent the over-accumulation of fatigue +poisons; in other words, they keep the nerves and muscles from knowing +that they are tired, and so they go on working. + +It is possible, of course, to conceive of an emergency in which that is +necessary. Once upon a time, on a hunting trip, I had been traveling all +day, and was caught in a rain storm, and exhausted and chilled to the +bone; I had to make camp without a fire, so when I got the tent up I +wrapped myself in blankets and drank a couple of tablespoons full of +whiskey. That is the only time I have ever taken whiskey in my life, +and it warmed me almost instantly, and did me no harm. In the same way +there were two or three occasions when I was on the verge of a nervous +breakdown, and could not sleep, and let the doctor give me a sleeping +powder. But in each case I knew that I was fooling with a dangerous +habit, and I did no more fooling than necessary. No one should make use +of either stimulants or narcotics except in extreme emergency, and never +but a few times in a lifetime. What you should do is to change your +habits so that you will not need to over-strain. + +All these drugs are habit forming; that is to say, they leave the body +no better, and with a craving for a repetition of the relief. When you +are tired, it is because your muscles and nerves are storing up fatigue +poisons more rapidly than your blood-stream can get rid of them. You +need to know about this condition, and exhaustion and pain are nature's +protective warning. If you put a stop to the warning, you are as +unintelligent as the Eastern despots who used to cut off the head of the +messenger who brought bad tidings. If, when you have a headache, you go +into a drug store and let the druggist mix you one of those white fizzy +drinks, what you are doing is not to get rid of the poisons in your +blood-stream, but merely to reduce the action of your heart, so as to +keep the blood from pressing so fast into the aching blood vessels and +nerves. You may try that trick with your heart a number of times, but +sooner or later you will try it once too often--your heart will stop a +little bit quicker than you meant it to! + +Drugs are poisons, and their action depends upon their poisoning some +particular portion of the body, and temporarily paralyzing it. And bear +this in mind, they are none the less poisonous because they are +"natural" products. You can kill yourself by cyanide of potassium, which +comes out of a chemist's retort; but you can kill yourself just as dead +with laudanum, which comes out of a plant, or with the contents of the +venom sac of a snake. You are poisoning yourself none the less certainly +if you use alcohol, which is made from the juices of beautiful fruits, +and has had hosts of famous poets writing songs about it; or you can +poison yourself with the caffein which you get in a lovely brown bean +which comes from Brazil, fragrant to the nostrils and delicious to the +taste. You may drink wine and tea and coffee for a hundred years, and +have your picture published in the newspapers as a proof that these +habits conduce to health; but nothing will be said about the large +number of people who practiced these habits, and didn't live so long, +and about how long they might have lived if they hadn't practiced these +habits. + +I was brought up in the South, and my "elders" belonged to a generation +which had grown up in war time. For this reason many of the men both +drank and smoked to excess, and in my boyhood I lived among them and +watched them, and with the help of advice from a wise mother, I +conceived a horror of every kind of stimulant. The alcoholic poets could +not fool me; I had been in the alcoholic wards of the hospitals. I had +seen one man after another, beautiful and kindly and gracious men, +dragged down into a pit of torment and shame. + +Alcohol is, I think, the greatest trap that nature ever set for the feet +of the human race. It is responsible for more degradation and misery +than any other evil in the world; and I say this, knowing well that my +Socialist friends will cry, "What about Capitalism?" My answer is that I +doubt if there ever would have been any Capitalism in the world, if it +had not been for alcohol. If the workers had not been systematically +poisoned, and all their savings taken from them by the gin-mill, they +would never have submitted to the capitalist system, they would have +built the co-operative commonwealth at the time they were building the +first factories. I listen to the arguments of my radical friends about +"personal liberty," but I note that in Russia, when it was a question of +making a practical revolution and keeping it alive, the first thing the +leaders did was to drag out the contents of the wine-cellars of the +palaces, and smash them in the gutters. + +Tea and coffee are, of course, much milder in their effects than +alcohol; you can play with them longer, and the punishment will be less +severe. But if you make habitual use of them, you will pay the penalty +which all drugs exact from the system. Your brain and your nerve centers +will be less sensitive, less capable of working except under the +influence of drugs; their reacting power will be dulled, and they will +wear out more quickly. I have watched the slaves of the "morning cup of +coffee," and know how they suffer when they do not get it. Likewise, I +have watched the tea drinkers. It is comical to live in England, and see +all the able-bodied men obliged to leave their work at four o'clock in +the afternoon, and seek the regular stimulus for their tired nerves. If +you are to meet anybody, it is always for "tea" that the ceremony is +set, and if you refuse to drink tea, your hostess will be uncomfortable, +unable to talk about anything but the strange, incredible notion that +one can live without tea. I discovered after a while the solution of +this problem; I would say that I preferred a little hot water, if you +please, and so my hostess would pour me a cup of hot water, and I would +sit and gravely sip it, and everybody would be perfectly content: I was +conforming to the outward appearance of normality, which is what the +British conventions require. + +I have never drunk a cup of coffee, so I do not know what its effect on +me would be. But some fifteen years ago I drank a glass of very weak +iced tea at eight o'clock in the evening, and did not get to sleep until +four or five the next morning. So I know that there is really a drug in +tea. I know also that I might accustom my system to it, just as I might +learn to poison my lungs with nicotine without being made immediately +and suddenly ill; but why should I wish to do this? Life is so +interesting to me that I do not need to stimulate my brain centers in +order to appreciate the thrill of it. And when I am tired, I can rest +myself by listening to music, or by reading a worth-while novel--things +which I have found do not leave the after effects of nicotine. + +I remember the first time I met Jack London. Our meeting consisted in +good part of his "kidding" me, because I was lacking in the congenial +vices of the cafe. He told me how much I had missed, because I had never +been drunk; One ought to try the great adventure, at least once! Poor +Jack is gone, because his kidneys gave out at forty; and nothing could +seem more ungracious than to point out that I am still alive, and +finding life enjoyable. Yet, in this book we are trying to find out how +to live, and if there are habits which wreck and destroy a magnificent +physique, and bring a great genius to death at the age of forty--surely +the rest of us want to know about it, and to be warned in time. I +mention Jack London in this connection, because he has said the last +word on the subject of alcohol. Read "John Barleycorn," and especially +read between the lines of it, and you will not need my argument to +persuade you to be glad that the Eighteenth Amendment has been written +into the Constitution, and that it is your duty as a Socialist, not +merely to obey it, but to vote for its enforcement. + +I am proceeding on the assumption that your life is of importance to +you; that you have a job to do which you know to be worth while, and to +which you desire to apply your powers. You agree with me that the +workers of the world are suffering, and that it is necessary for them to +find their freedom, and that this takes hard work and hard thinking. You +may say that I exaggerate the amount of harm that is done to the system +by tea and coffee, alcohol and tobacco. Well, let us assume that in +moderate quantities they do no harm at all: even so, I have the right to +ask you to show that they do some good; otherwise, surely, it is a +mistake for the workers to spend their savings upon them. + +Consider, for example, the amount of money which the wage slaves of the +world spend upon tobacco. Suppose they could be persuaded for two or +three years to spend this amount upon good reading matter--do you not +think there would be an improvement in their condition? Surely you +cannot maintain that the use of tobacco is necessary to the activities +of the brain! Surely you do not think that a man has to have a cigarette +in order to stimulate his thoughts, or to smoke a pipe to rest himself +after his work is done! I offer myself as evidence in such a +controversy; I have written as many books as any man in the radical +movement, and the sum total of my lifetime smoking amounts to one-half +of one cigarette. I tried that when I was eight years old, and somebody +told me a policeman would arrest me if he caught me, and I threw away +the cigarette, and ran and hid in an alley, and have not yet got over my +scare. + +In the "Journal for Industrial Hygiene" for October, 1920, is an article +entitled "Fatigue and Efficiency of Smokers in a Strenuous Mental +Occupation." Experiments were conducted among telegraph operators, and +the result showed that "the heavy smokers of the group show a higher +output rate at the beginning of the day than the light smokers, but +their rate falls off more markedly in the late hours, and their +production for the whole day is definitely less than that of the light +smokers. The heavy smokers also show less ability than the light smokers +to respond to increasing pressure of work in the late hours of the day +by handling their full share of the work presented." + +One point upon which every medical authority agrees is--that the use of +nicotine is of deadly effect upon the immature organism. Half-grown +youths who smoke cigarettes will never be full-sized men; they will +never have normal lungs or a normal heart. And likewise, all authorities +agree about the effect of smoking upon the organism of women. I gave +what little help I could to the task of helping to set women free, and +to make them the equals of men; but I was always pained when I +discovered that some of my feminist friends understood by woman's +emancipation no more than her right to adopt men's vices. I would say to +these ardent young female radicals, who cultivate the art of dangling a +cigarette from their lower lip, and sip cocktails out of coffee-cups in +Greenwich Village cafes, that they will never be able to bear sound +children; but I know that this would not interest them--they don't want +to bear any children at all. So I say that they will never be able to +think straight thoughts, and will be nervous invalids when they are +thirty. + +We went to war to make the world safe for democracy, and we put several +millions of our young men into armies, and if there were any of them who +did not already know how to smoke cigarettes, they learned it under +official sanction. So now we have a national tobacco bill that runs up +to two billions, and will insure us a new generation of "Class C" +rating. Speaking to the young radicals who are reading my books, I say: +We want to make the world over, to make it a place of freedom and +kindness, instead of the hell of greed and hate that it is today. For +that purpose we need a new moral code, and we can never win our victory +without it. I have attended radical conventions, sitting in unventilated +halls amid clouds of tobacco smoke, and listening to men wrangle all +through the day and a great part of the night; I have watched the fatal +dissensions in the movement, the quarrelings of the right wingers and +the left wingers and all stages and degrees in between, and I have +wondered--not jestingly, but in pitying earnest--how much of all those +personalities and factional misunderstanding had their origin in carbon +dioxide and nicotine. There is no use suggesting such ideas to the older +men, whose habits are fixed; but a new generation is coming on, with a +new vision of the enormous task before it; and is it too much to expect +of these young men and women, that they shall realize in advance the +grim tasks they have to do, and shall learn to run the machine of their +body so as to get out of it the maximum amount of service? Is it too +much to hope for, that some day we shall have a race of young fighters +for truth and justice, who are willing to live abstemious lives, and +consecrate themselves to the task of delivering mankind from wage +slavery and war? + + + + +CHAPTER XXIII + +MORE ABOUT HEALTH + + (Discusses the subjects of breathing and ventilation, clothing, + bathing and sleep.) + + +In discussing the question of health, we have given the greater part of +the space to the subject of diet, for the reason that experience has +convinced us that diet is two-thirds of health, and that nearly always +in disease you find errors of diet playing a part. There are, however, +other important factors of health, now to be discussed. + +Everything of which the body makes use is taken in the form of food and +drink, with the exception of one substance, the oxygen we get out of the +air. Every time we draw a breath we take in a certain amount of oxygen, +and every time we expel a breath, we drive out a certain amount of a gas +called carbon dioxide, which is what the body makes of the fuel it +burns. The body can get along for several days without water, and for +two or three months without food, but it can only get along for two or +three minutes without oxygen. It should be obvious that when the body +expels carbon dioxide, with a slight mixture of other more poisonous +gases, and sucks back what it expects will be a fresh supply of oxygen, +it wants to get oxygen, and not the same gases it has just expelled, nor +gases which have been expelled from the lungs of other people. + +In the days when primitive man lived outdoors, he did not have to think +about this problem. When he breathed poison from his lungs, the moving +air of nature blew it away, and the infinite vegetation of nature took +the carbon dioxide and turned it back into oxygen. And even when man +built himself shelters, he was not cunning enough to make them +air-tight; he had to leave a big hole for the smoke to get out, and +smaller holes through which to get light. But now our wonderful +civilization has solved these problems; we make our walls of air-tight +plaster, and we have invented a substance which will admit light without +admitting air. So we have the "white plague" of tuberculosis, and so we +have innumerable minor plagues of coughs and colds and sore throats. + +In the summer time the solution of the problem is easy. Have as many +doors and windows in your home as possible, and keep them open, and have +nothing in your home to make dust or to retain dust. But then comes +stormy and cold weather, and you have to close your doors and windows, +and keep your home at a higher temperature than the air outside. How +shall you do this, and at the same time get a continual supply of fresh +air? + +I will take the various methods of heating one by one. The problem in +each case is simple and can be made clear in a sentence or two. + +First, the open fireplace. This is a perfect solution, if you have +enough fuel, and do not have to worry about the waste of heat. An open +fireplace draws out all the air in the room in a short time, and you do +not have to bother about opening doors or windows; you may be sure that +the air is getting in through some cracks, or else the fire would not +burn. + +Second, a wood or coal or gas stove in the room, provided with a proper +vent, so that all the gases of combustion are drawn up the chimney. This +changes the air more slowly than an open fireplace, but it does the work +fairly well. All that you have to be careful about is that your vent is +sufficiently large and is working properly. If your fire does not +"draw," you will have smoke or coal-gas in the house, and this is bad +for the lungs; but worse for the lungs is a gas that you can neither see +nor smell nor taste, the deadly carbon monoxide. This gas is produced by +incomplete combustion, and whenever you see yellow flames from gas or +coal, you are apt to have this poisonous substance. Small quantities of +it are sufficient to cause violent headaches, and repeated doses of it +are fatal. Men who work in garages which are not properly ventilated run +this risk all the time, because carbon monoxide is one of the products +of imperfect combustion in the gas engine. + +Next, the furnace. A furnace sends fresh warm air into your house; the +only trouble is that it takes out all the moisture, and some authorities +say that this is bad for the lungs and throat. I do not know whether +this is true, but all furnaces are supposed to have a water chamber to +supply moisture to the air, and you should keep a pan of water on every +stove or radiator in your house. + +Next, steam heat, which includes hot-water heating. This is one of the +abominations of our civilization, and one of the methods by which our +race is committing suicide. There is nothing wrong about steam heat in +itself; the room is warmed in a harmless way; but the trouble is it +stays warm only so long as the doors and windows are kept shut. You are +in an air-tight box, and can be warm provided you do not mind being +suffocated. The moment you open a door or window, you have a cold draft +on your feet, and if you wish to change the air entirely you have to let +out all the heat; so, of course, you never do change it entirely, but go +on breathing the same air over and over, and every time you breathe it +the condition of your body is a little more reduced. + +The solution of this problem is not to heat the air in the room, but to +use your steam coils to heat fresh air, and then drive this air, already +warmed, into the room, at the same time providing a vent through which +the old air can be pushed out. This is the hot air system of heating, +and it requires some kind of engine or dynamo, and therefore is +expensive. It has been installed in a few office buildings and theaters. +One of the most perfect systems I ever inspected is in the building of +the New York Stock Exchange, where the air is warmed in winter, and +cooled in summer, and freed from dust, and exactly the right quantity is +supplied. It is a humorous commentary upon our civilization that we take +perfect care of the breathing apparatus of our stock-gamblers, but pay +no attention to the breathing apparatus of our senators and congressmen, +whose one business in life is to use their lungs. The stately old +building with its white marble domes looks impressive in moving pictures +and on illustrated postcards, but it has no system of ventilation +whatever, and is a death-trap to the poor wretches who are compelled to +spend their days, and sometimes their nights, within its walls. This +contrast is one symptom of the rise of industrial capitalism and the +collapse of political democracy. + +We have reserved to the last a method of heating which is the worst, and +can only be described as a crime against health: the use of gas and oil +stoves set out in the middle of the room, without a vent, and +discharging their fumes into the room. These stoves are simply +instruments of slow death, and their manufacture should be prohibited +by law. In the meantime, what you have to do is to refuse to live in a +room or to work in an office where such stoves are used. I have heard +dealers insist that this or the other kind of gas or oil stove was so +contrived as to consume all the fumes. Do not let anybody fool you with +such nonsense. There has never been any form of combustion devised which +consumes all the fumes. No such thing can be, because the products of +combustion are not combustible. The so-called "wickless blue flame" +stoves do burn all the oil, and a properly regulated gas stove will burn +all the gas, but that simply means that it turns the oil and gas into +carbon dioxide, the very substance which your lungs are working day and +night to get out of your body. + +Moreover, there is no oil or gas stove which ever burns perfectly all +the time, either because there is too much gas or insufficient air. Oil +and gas stoves sometimes give a partly yellow flame. You can cause them +to give a yellow flame at any time by blowing air against them, and that +yellow flame means imperfect combustion, and a probability of the deadly +carbon monoxide. These facts are known to every chemist and to every +student of hygiene, and the fact that civilized people continue to burn +such oil and gas stoves in their homes and offices is simply one more +proof that our civilization values human welfare and health at nothing +whatever in comparison with profits. + +Not merely should you see that you have a continuous supply of fresh air +in your home, but you should try to keep down dust in your home, and +especially fine particles of lint. Once upon a time our ancestors were +unable to make houses and floors tight, and so they put rugs on the +floors and hung tapestries on the walls to keep out the wind. We +civilized people are able to make both floors and walls absolutely +tight, and yet we continue to use rugs and curtains, it being the first +principle of our education that propriety requires us to continue to do +the things which our ancestors did. I am unable to think of a more silly +or stupid thing in the world than a rug or a curtain, but I have lived +in the house with them all my life, because, alas, the ladies cannot be +happy otherwise. They want their homes to be "pretty," and so they +continue to set dust traps, and to set themselves futile jobs of house +cleaning and shopping. + +Not all of us are able to be out of doors as much as we ought to be, but +all of us spend seven or eight hours out of every twenty-four in sleep, +and this time at least we ought to spend out of doors. I understand that +this is futile advice to give to the very poor. I was poor myself for +many years, and had to put all my clothes on at night in order to keep +warm, and even then I could not always do it. Nevertheless, from the +time I first realized the importance of ventilation I never slept in a +room with a closed window. + +I say, sleep outdoors if you possibly can. You do not have to be afraid +of exposure, for cold will not hurt you if you keep your body in proper +condition. I have slept out in a rubber blanket, with the rain beating +on my head and face; I have spread a rubber blanket on a hummock in the +midst of a swamp, and waked up in the morning with my hair and face +soaked in cold, white fog, but I never caught cold from such things; +there is no harm whatever in dampness or in "night air," if you are in +proper condition. Of course, you may get your ears frostbitten in the +middle of winter, but you can have a sleeping hood to remove that +danger. + +The "nature cure" enthusiasts, who lay so much stress upon an outdoor +life, also insist that the wearing of clothes is a harmful civilized +custom. They urge us to take "sun baths" and to "ventilate the skin." +Now, as a matter of fact, the skin does not breathe, it merely gives out +moisture, and it does not give out any less because we have clothing on +us, provided the clothing is dry and clean, and will absorb moisture. +But bye and bye the clothing becomes loaded with the waste substances +given out by the skin, and then it will absorb no more, and if you do +not change your clothing, no doubt it may have some effect upon health. + +But the principal evil of civilized clothing is that it binds the body +and prevents the free play of the muscles, and, more important yet, +stops the free circulation of the blood. I have already discussed hats, +which are the principal cause of baldness. I will go to the other +extremity of the body, and mention tight shoes, which, strange as it may +seem, cause headaches and colds. You will be able to find a few +civilized men with normal feet, but you will hardly ever find a woman +whose toes are not crowded together and misshapen. I have said that the +human body is one organism, and that it is fed and its health +maintained by the blood-stream; I say now that the circulation of the +blood is one thing, and if you block it at any one place, you block it +everywhere. Of course, not all the blood-stream goes down into the feet, +but some of it does, and if it is clogged in the feet, and the blood +vessels cramped and crowded, there is a certain amount of poison kept in +the system, which the system should have got rid of. + +Why do women wear tight shoes? Because the leisure class members of +their sex have been kept in harems and used as the playthings of men. To +be fragile and delicate was the thing admired by the masters of wealth, +and to have small hands and feet was a sign that women belonged to this +parasite class. Therefore at all hazards women's feet must be kept +small, even at the expense of their health and happiness; and so they +put themselves up on several inches of heels, which cause them to toddle +around like marionettes on a stage, with all their toes crowded down +into a lump. + +Why do men wear tight bands around their scalps, which cause their hair +to drop out, and tight, stiff columns around their necks, which stop the +circulation of the blood into their heads, and cause them to have +headaches instead of ideas? The reason is that for ages the rulers of +the tribe have wished to demonstrate publicly their superiority to the +common herd, which does the menial tasks. In England all gentlemen wear +tall black silk band-boxes on their heads, and in America they have a +choice among several varieties of round tight boxes. All men who work in +offices wear stiffly starched collars and cuffs, as a means of +demonstrating their superiority to the common workers, who have to sweat +at their necks. I think it is not too much to hope that when class +exploitation is done away with, we shall also get rid of these class +symbols, and choose our clothing because it is warm and comfortable, and +not according to the perverted imbecilities of "style." + +The skin gives out perspiration which is greasy; also the skin is +constantly growing, putting out layers of cells which dry up and are +worn off. We need to bathe with soap to remove the grease, and we need +to rub with a towel to brush away the dead cells of the skin, so that +the pores may be kept open. No one is taking care of his body who does +not wash and rub it once every twenty-four hours, and once or twice a +week with warm water and soap. It is often stated that hot baths are +weakening, but I have never found it so; however, I think it is a bad +practice to pamper the body, which should be accustomed to the shock of +cold water. The rule as to bathing, both as to temperature and time, is +simple. If, after the bath and rub-down, your body has reacted and you +feel vigorous and fresh, that bath has done you good. If, on the other +hand, you feel chilled and depressed, then you have been too long in the +water, or its temperature was too low. Every person has to find his own +rules in such matters. The only general rule is that as one grows older +the body reacts less quickly. + +All day, as we work and think, we store up more poisons in our cells +than the body can get rid of, and the time comes when the cells are so +loaded with poisons that we have to stop for a while, and let our +blood-stream clean house. The quantity of sleep one needs is a problem +like that of cold water; each person has to find his own rule. In +general, one needs less and less sleep as one grows older. Infants sleep +the greater part of the time; growing children should sleep ten or +eleven hours, adults seven or eight, and old people, unless they have +let themselves get fat, generally do not want to sleep more than six, +and part of this in short naps. When you sleep, your bodily energies +relax, and you make less heat, therefore you need extra clothing; but +this clothing should never cover the mouth and nose, nor should it be so +heavy as to make breathing a burden. If you are in good condition, it +will do you no harm to be chilly when you sleep, except that you do not +sleep so soundly. Sleeping too much is just as harmful as sleeping too +little. Nature will tell you that. The important thing, as in all other +problems of health, is to have something interesting to think about, +some exciting work to do in the world, and then you will sleep as little +as you have too. + + + + +CHAPTER XXIV + +WORK AND PLAY + + (Deals with the question of exercise, both for the idle and the + overworked.) + + +In discussing the important question of exercise, there is one +fundamental fact to begin with: that our present civilization divides +men sharply into two classes, those who do not get enough exercise, and +those who get too much. Obviously it would be folly to make the same +recommendations to the two classes. + +I begin with those who get too much exercise. They include a great +number, probably the majority of those who do the manual work of the +world. They include the farmers and the farm-hands, who work from dawn +to sunset, and sometimes by lantern light. They include also the +farmers' wives, the kitchen slaves of whom the old couplet tells: + + "Man's work ends from sun to sun, + But woman's work is never done." + +I am aware that men have worked that way for countless ages, and yet the +race is still surviving; but I am aware also that men wither up with +rheumatism, and contract chronic diseases of the kidneys and the blood +vessels, consequent upon the creation of greater quantities of fatigue +poisons than the body can regularly eliminate. + +I have very little interest in the past, and none whatever in finding +fault with it. My purpose is to criticize the present for the benefit of +the future, and therefore I say that modern machinery and the whole +development of modern large-scale production make it absolutely +unnecessary that women should slave all their waking hours in kitchens, +or that men should slave all day. I say it is monstrous folly that men +should work for twelve-hour stretches in steel mills, and for ten and +eleven hours in factories and mines. Organized labor has adopted the +slogan, "Eight hours for work, eight hours for sleep, eight hours for +play"; but my slogan is "Four hours for work, four hours for study, +eight hours for sleep, and eight hours for play." + +I know, and am prepared to demonstrate to any thinking man, that modern +civilization can produce, not merely all the necessities, but all the +comforts of life for every man, woman and child in the community, by the +expenditure of four hours a day work of the adult, able-bodied men and +women. So to all the wage slaves of the factories and mines, the fields +and the kitchens, I say that too much exercise is what is the matter +with you, and what you need is to get off in a quiet nook in the woods +and read a good novel, not merely for a few hours, but for a few months, +until you get over the effects of capitalist civilization. I know that +not many of you can get away as yet, but I urge you to insist upon +getting away, to fight for the chance to get away; and I will here +suggest a few of the novels for you to read when finally you do get +away. I choose the easy ones, which the dullest and most tired of you +will love; I say, make up your mind to read these thirty-two books +before you die, and do not let the world cheat you out of your chance! + +Mark Twain: A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Charles D. +Stewart: The Fugitive Blacksmith. W. Clark Russell: The Wreck of the +Grosvenor. R. L. Stevenson: Treasure Island, Kidnapped. Jack London: The +Sea Wolf, The Call of the Wild, Martin Eden. Joseph Conrad: Youth. H. G. +Wells: The War of the Worlds, When the Sleeper Wakes, The Sea Lady, The +History of Mr. Polly, The Food of the Gods, The Island of Dr. Moreau. +Upton Sinclair: The Jungle, King Coal, Jimmie Higgins, 100 Per Cent. +Theodore Dreiser: Sister Carrie. George Moore: Esther Waters. Frank +Norris: The Octopus. Brand Whitlock: The Turn of the Balance. De Foe: +Robinson Crusoe. Fielding: Tom Jones, Jonathan Wild the Great. +Thackeray: The Adventures of Barry Lyndon. Marmaduke Pickthall: The +Adventures of Hadji Baba. Blasco Ibanez: The Fruit of the Vine. Frank +Harris: Montes the Matador. Frederik van Eeden: The Quest. Tolstoi: +Resurrection. + +And now for the people who do not get enough exercise. In the armies of +King Cyrus it was the law that every man was required to sweat once +every twenty-four hours, and that is still the law for every business +man and office-worker and writer of books. There is no substitute for +it, and there is no health without it. I have heard Dr. Kellogg say that +the modern woman sends out her health with her washing, and I have +heard the leisure class ladies at the Sanitarium discuss this cryptic +utterance and wonder what he meant by it. I know that there is use +telling leisure class ladies what exercise at the wash-tub would do for +their abdomens and backs. I will only tell them that unless they can +find some kind of vigorous activity which keeps them in a free +perspiration for an hour or two each day, they will never be really +well, and will never bear children without agony and abortion. + +For myself, I have found that the minimum is three or four times a week. +Unless I get that much hard exercise I am soon in trouble. So my advice +to the business man is to take off his coat and collar and turn out and +help his truck-man; my advice to the white collar slave is to get a +part-time job, and dig ditches the rest of the time. To the man who has +cares which pursue him, and likewise to the ardent student and +brain-worker, I say that they should find, not merely exercise, but +play. The distinction between the two things is important. There can be +play that is not exercise, for example cards and chess; and, of course, +there can be exercise that is not play. What you must have is something +that is both play and exercise; something that not merely causes your +heart to beat fast, and your lungs to pump fast, and your sweat glands +to throw out poisons from your body, but something that fully occupies +your mind and gives your higher brain centers a chance to relax. + +Our civilization has very largely destroyed the possibility of play and +the spirit of play. We civilized people no longer know what play is, and +regard the desire to play as something abnormal--a form of vice. We +allow children to play after school hours, and on Saturdays; but for +grown-up, serious-minded men and women to want to play would be almost +as disreputable as for them to want to get drunk. What could foe more +pitiful than the spectacle of tens of thousands of men crowding into our +baseball parks and amusement fields to watch other men play for them! +Imagine, if you can, a crowd of people gathering in a restaurant or +theater to watch other people _eat_ for them! Imagine yourself a man +from Mars, coming down to a world with so many people in want, and +finding whole classes of men forbidden to do any work, under penalty of +disgrace, and compelled, in order to exercise their muscles, to pull on +rubber straps and lift weights and wave dumb-bells and Indian clubs in +the air--methods of expending their muscular energy which are +respectable because they accomplish nothing! + +When I was a boy, I was fond of all kinds of games. I was a good tennis +player, and in the country an incessant hunter and fisherman. When on +the city streets we boys could not find any other game to play, we would +get up on the roofs of the houses and throw clothes-pins and snow-balls +at the "Dagoes" working in the nearby excavations; so we had the fine +game of being chased by the "Dagoes," with the chance, real or +imaginary, of having a knife stuck into us. But then, as I grew older, +and became aware of the pain and misery of the world, I lost my interest +in games, and for ten years or so I never played; I did nothing but +study and write. So my health gave way, and I had the problem of +restoring it, and I spent some twenty years wrestling with this problem, +before I thoroughly convinced myself on the point that there can be no +such thing as sound and permanent health without a certain amount of +play. + +I don't think there is any kind of hard physical work I failed to try, +in the course of my experiments. I rode horseback, and took long walks, +and climbed mountains, and swam, and dug gardens, and chopped down whole +groves of trees and cut them up and carried them to the fireplace. I +have done this latter work for a whole winter in the country, several +hours every day, and it has done my health no good to speak of; I have +been ready for a breakdown at the end of it. The reason is that all the +time I was doing these things with my body, I was going right on working +my brain. While I was swimming or climbing a mountain or galloping on +horseback, I was absorbed in the next chapter of the book I was writing, +so that I literally did not know where I was. I would make up my mind +that I would not think about my work, and would make desperate efforts +not to do so; but it was like walking along the edge of a slippery +ditch--sooner or later I was bound to fall in, and go floundering along, +unable to get out again! + +And the same thing applies to all gymnastic work. I have experimented +with a dozen different systems of exercises, and with all kinds of water +treatments; I have used dumb-bells and Indian clubs and Swedish +gymnastics, MacFadden's exercises in bed, and the Yogi breathing +exercises, and more kinds of queer things than I can remember now; but +for me there is only one solution of the problem, which is to have an +antagonist. It may be a deer I am trying to shoot, or some trout I am +trying to lure out of their holes; it may be some boys I am trying to +beat at football or hockey, or it may be the game I know best and find +most convenient, which is tennis. If it is tennis, then it has to be +someone who can make me work as hard as I know how; for if it is someone +I can beat easily, why, before I have been playing ten minutes, I am +busily working out the next chapter of a book, or answering letters I +have just got in the mail. + +Recently I came upon a book, "The Psychology of Relaxation," by Dr. +Patrick, in which the theory of this is set forth. Civilized man is +working his higher brain centers more than his body can stand; his brain +is running away with him, absorbing a constantly increasing share of his +energies. True relaxation is only possible where the higher brain +centers are lulled, and the back lobes of the brain brought into +activity. One of the means of doing this is alcohol, and that is why +through the ages all races of men have craved to get drunk. There is a +method which is harmless, and does not break down the system, and that +is play. When we become really interested in play, we are as children, +or as primitive man; we do all the things that our race used to do many +ages ago; we hunt and fight, we pit our wits against the wits of our +enemies, and struggle with desperation to get the better of them. If our +play is physical play, if we are absorbed in a game or bodily contest, +then we are exerting and developing all those portions of us which +civilization tends to atrophy and deaden. + +There are people who will dispute with you about Socialism, and ask, how +we are going to provide incentives if we do away with wage slavery. When +you tell them that activity is natural to human beings, and that if +there were no work, men and women would have to make some, they shake +their heads mournfully and tell you about the problem of "human nature." +But consider games and sports: men do not have to work their bodies, yet +they go out and deliberately hunt for trouble! They invent themselves +subtle and complicated games, and are not content until they find people +who can beat them at it, or at any rate can make them work to the limit +of their strength, until they are in a dripping perspiration and +thoroughly exhausted! I may be too optimistic about "human nature," but +I believe that this is the attitude every normal human being takes +toward the powers, both mental and physical, which he possesses; he +wants to use them, and for all they are worth. If you don't believe it, +just take any group of youngsters, give them a baseball and bat, turn +them loose in a vacant lot, and watch them "choose up sides" and fall to +work, screaming and shouting in wild excitement! There are some races of +the earth which do not yet know baseball, but the Filipinos and the +Japanese have learned it, and even the war-worn "Poilus" and the +supercilious "Tommies" condescended to experiment with it. And if you +think it is only physical competition that young human animals enjoy, +try them at putting on a play, or printing a magazine, or conducting a +debate, or building a house--anything whatever that involves healthy +competition, and is related to the big things of life, but without being +for the profit of some exploiter! Get clear the plain and simple +distinction between work and play: play is what you want to do, while +work is what the profit system makes you do! + + + + +CHAPTER XXV + +THE FASTING CURE + + (Deals with nature's own remedy for disease, and how to make use of + it.) + + +We have next to consider the various human ailments, what causes them, +and how they can be remedied. As it happens, I know of a cure that comes +pretty near being that impossible thing, a "cure-all." At any rate, it +is so far ahead of all other cures, that a discussion of it will cover +three-fourths of the subject. + +When I was a boy living in New York, there was a man by the name of Dr. +Tanner, who took a forty-day fast. He was on public exhibition at the +time, and was supposed to be watched day and night; the newspapers gave +a great deal of attention to the story, and crowds used to come to gaze +at him. I remember very well the conversations I heard about the matter. +People were quite sure that it couldn't be true. The man must be getting +something to eat on the sly; he must have some nourishment in the water +he drank; no human being could fast more than five or six days without +starving to death. + +In the year 1910 I published in the United States and England a magazine +article telling how on several occasions I had fasted ten or twelve +days, and what I had accomplished by it. I found that I had the same +difficulty to confront as old Dr. Tanner; I received scores of letters +from people who called me a "faker," and I read scores of newspaper +editorials to the same effect. The New York Times published a dispatch +about three young ladies on Long Island who were trying a three-day +fast, and the Times commented editorially to the effect that these young +ladies were "the victims of a shallow and unscrupulous sensationalist." + +The notion that human beings can perish for lack of food in a few days +is deeply rooted in people's minds. Recently a group of eleven Irishmen +in jail set to work to starve themselves to death, as a protest against +British rule in their country. Day after day the newspapers reported the +news from Cork prison, and at about the twentieth day they began to +state that the prisoners were dying, that the priest had been sent for, +that their relatives were gathered on the prison steps. Day after day +such reports continued, through the thirties, and the forties, and the +fifties, and the sixties, and the seventies. One man died on the +eighty-eighth day, and MacSwiney died on the seventy-fourth. The other +nine gave up after ninety-four days and were all restored to health. I +watched carefully the newspaper and magazine comment on this incident, +yet I did not see a single remark on the medical aspects of it; I could +not discover that scientific men had learned anything whatever about the +ability of the body to go without food for long periods. + +Get this clear at the outset: Nobody ever "starved to death" in less +than two months, and it is possible for a fat person to go without food +for as long as three or four months. People who "starve to death" in +shorter times do not die of starvation, but of fright. The first time I +fasted happened to be at the time of the Messina earthquake. I was +walking about, perfectly serene and happy, having been without food for +three days, and I read in my newspaper how the rescue ships had reached +Messina, and found the population ravenous, in the agonies of +starvation, some of the people having been without food for seventy-two +hours! (It sounds so much worse, you see, when you state it in hours.) + +The second point to get clear is that the fast is a physiological +process; that is to say, it is something which nature understands and +carries through in her own serene and efficient way. When you take a +fast, you are not carrying out a freak notion of your own, or of mine; +you are discovering a lost instinct. Every cat and dog knows enough not +to take food when it is ill; it is only in hospitals conducted by modern +medical science that the custom prevails of serving elaborate "trays" to +invalids. I remember a story about a man who made himself a reputation +and a fortune by curing the pet dogs of the rich. These beautiful little +creatures, which sleep between silken covers, and have several servants +to wait upon them, and are fed from gold and silver dishes upon rich and +elaborately cooked foods, fall victim to as many diseases as their +mistresses, and they would be brought to this specialist, who conducted +his dog hospital in an old brickyard. In each one of the compartments of +the brick kiln he would shut up a dog with a supply of fresh water, a +crust of stale bread, a piece of bacon rind, and the sole of an old +shoe; and after a few days he would go back and find that the dog had +eaten the crust of bread, and then he would write to the owner that the +dog was on the high road to recovery. He would go back a few days later +and find that the dog had eaten the piece of bacon rind, and then he +would write that the dog was very nearly cured. He would wait until the +dog had eaten the piece of shoe leather, and then he would write that +the dog was completely cured, and the owner might come and take it away. + +Just what is the process of the fast cure? I do not pretend to know +positively. I can only make guesses, and wait for science to +investigate. I believe that the main source of the diseases of civilized +man is improper nutrition, and the clogging of the system with food +poisons in various stages. And when you fast you do two things: first, +you stop entirely the fresh supply of those food poisons, and second, +you allow the whole of the body's digestive and assimilative tract to +rest--to go to sleep, as it were--so that all the body's energy may go +to other organs. The body carries with it at all times a surplus store +of nutriment, which can be taken up and used by the blood stream, +apparently with much less trouble than is required to convert fresh food +to the body's uses. In other words, the body can feed on its own tissues +more easily than it can feed from the stomach. In the fast you may lose +anywhere from half a pound to two pounds in weight per day, and this +will be taken, first from your store of fat, and then from your muscular +tissues. Every part of your muscular tissue will be taken, before +anything is taken from your vital organs, your nerves or your +blood-stream. So long as there is a particle of muscular material left, +so long as you can make even the slightest movement of one finger, you +are still fasting, and it is only when your muscular tissue is all gone +that you begin at last to starve. So far as I know, the cases of +MacSwiney and the other Irishman are the only cases on record where +fasters have died of starvation. + +What the body does during the fast is quite plain, and can be told by +many symptoms. It begins a thorough house-cleaning, throwing out +poisonous material by every channel. The perspiration and the breath +become offensive, the tongue becomes heavily coated, so that you can +scrape the material off with a knife. I have heard vegetarians explain +this by saying that when the body is living off its own tissues, it is +following a cannibal diet; but that is all nonsense, because you can +live on meat exclusively, and quickly satisfy yourself that none of +these symptoms occurs. It is evident that the body is taking advantage +of the opportunity to get rid of waste products; and this will go on for +ten days, for twenty days, in some cases for as long as forty or fifty +days; and then suddenly occurs a strange thing: in spite of the +"cannibal diet" the symptoms all come to a sudden end. The tongue +clears, the breath becomes sweet, the appetite suddenly awakens. + +During the period of a normal fast you lose all interest in food. You +almost forget that there is such a thing as eating; you can look at food +without any more desire for it than you have to swallow marbles and +carpet tacks. But then suddenly appetite returns, as I have explained, +and you find that you can think of nothing but food. This is what +students of the subject describe as a "complete fast," and while I do +not want to go to extremes and say that the "complete fast" will cure +every case of every disease, I can certainly say this: in the letters +which have come to me from people who tried the fast at my suggestion, +there are cases of every kind of common disease. In my book, "The +Fasting Cure," I give the results in cases reported to me after the +publication of my first magazine article. I quote two paragraphs: + +"The total number of fasts taken was 277, and the average number of days +was six. There were 90 of five days or over, 51 of ten days or over, and +six of 30 days or over. Out of the 119 person who wrote to me, 100 +reported benefit, and 17 no benefit. Of these 17 about half give wrong +breaking of the fast as the reason for the failure. In cases where the +cure had not proved permanent, about half mentioned that the recurrence +of the trouble was caused by wrong eating, and about half of the rest +made this quite evident by what they said. Also it is to be noted that +in the cases of the 17 who got no benefit, nearly all were fasts of only +three or four days. + +"Following is the complete list of diseases benefited--45 of the cases +having been diagnosed by physicians: indigestion (usually associated +with nervousness), 27; rheumatism, 5; colds, 8; tuberculosis, 4; +constipation, 14; poor circulation, 3; headaches, 5; anaemia, 3; +scrofula, 1; bronchial trouble, 5; syphilis, 1; liver trouble, 5; +general debility, 5; chills and fever, 1; blood poisoning, 1; ulcerated +leg, 1; neurasthenia, 6; locomotor ataxia, 1; sciatica, 1; asthma, 2; +excess of uric acid, 1; epilepsy, 1; pleurisy, 1; impaction of bowels, +1; eczema, 2; catarrh, 6; appendicitis, 3; valvular disease of heart, 1; +insomnia, 1; gas poisoning, 1; grippe, 1; cancer, 1." + +There are many diseases with many causes, and some yield more quickly +than others to the fast. In the first group I put the diseases of the +digestive and alimentary tract. Stomach and bowel troubles, and the +nervous disorders occasioned by these, stop almost immediately when you +fast. Next come disorders of the blood-stream, which are generally a +second stage of digestive troubles. Everything immediately due to +impurities of the blood, pimples, boils, and ulcers, inflammation, badly +healing wounds, etc., respond to a few days of fasting as to the magic +touch of the old-time legends. When it comes to diseases caused by germ +infections, you have a double aspect of the problem, and must have a +double method of attack. I would not like to say that fasting could cure +such a disease as sleeping sickness, to the germs of which our systems +are not accustomed, and against which they may well be helpless. On the +other hand, in the case of common infections, such as colds and sore +throats, the fast is again the touch of magic. Having been plagued a +great deal by these ailments in past times, I am accustomed to say that +I would not trade my knowledge of fasting for everything else that I +know about health. + +The first thing you must do if you want to take a fast is to read the +literature on the subject and make up your mind that the experiment will +do you no injury. You should also try to get your relatives to make up +their minds, because you are nervous when you are fasting, and cannot +withstand the attacks of the people around you, who will go into a panic +and throw you into a panic. As I said before, it is quite possible for +people to die of panic, but I do not believe that anybody ever died of a +fast. I have known of two or three cases of people dying while they were +fasting, but I feel quite certain that the fast did not cause their +death; they would have died anyhow. You must bear in mind that among the +people who try the fast, a great many are in a desperate condition; some +have been given up by the doctors, and if now and then one of these +should die, we may surely say that they died in spite of the fast, and +not because of it. There is no physician who can save every patient, and +it would be absurd to expect this. I have read scores of letters from +people who were at the point of death from such "fatal" diseases as +Bright's disease, sclerosis of the liver, and fatty degeneration of the +heart, and were literally snatched out of the jaws of death by beginning +a fast. I would not like to guess just what percentage of dying people +in our hospitals might be saved if the doctors would withdraw all food +from them, but I await with interest the time when medical science will +have the intelligence to try that simple experiment and report the +results. + +Just the other day in the Los Angeles county jail, a chiropractor went +on hunger strike, as a protest against imprisonment, and he fasted 41 +days. Then he broke his fast, the reason being given that his pulse was +down to 54, and he was afraid of dying. I smiled to myself. The normal +pulse is 70. I have taken my pulse many times at the end of a ten-day +fast, and it has been as low as 32, and I am not dead yet, and if I wait +to die from the symptoms of a fast, I expect to live a long time indeed! + +The first time I fasted, I felt very weak, and lay around and hardly +cared to lift my head; if I walked from my bed to the lawn, I was tired +in the legs. But since then I have grown used to fasting. I have fasted +for a week probably twenty or thirty times, and on such occasions I have +gone about my business as if nothing were happening. Of course I would +not try to play tennis, or to climb a mountain, but it is a fact that on +the seventh day of a fast in New York, I climbed the five or six flights +of stairs to the top of the Metropolitan Opera House, and felt no ill +effects from doing this. I climbed slowly, and was careful not to tire +myself. The simple rule is not to have anything that you must do on the +fast, and then do what you feel like doing. Lie down and rest, and read +a book, and take as much exercise as you find you enjoy. Keep your mind +quiet and free from worries, and lock out of the house everybody who +tells you that your heart is going to stop beating in the next few +minutes, and that you must have an injection of strychnine to start it, +and some beefsteak and fried onions to "restore your strength." Give +yourself up to the care of your wise old mother nature, who will attend +to your heart just as securely and serenely as she attended to it in the +days before you were born. + +By fasting I mean that you take no food whatever. I know some nature +cure teachers who practice what they call a "fruit fast." All I know is +that if I eat nothing but fruit, I soon have my stomach boiling with +fermentation, and also I suffer with hunger; whereas, if I take a +complete fast, I promptly forget all about food. You must drink all the +water you can on the fast. This helps nature with her house-cleaning; it +is well to drink a glass of water every half hour at least. Do not try +to go without water, and then write me that the fasting cure is a +failure. Also please do not write and ask me if it will be fasting if +you take just a little crackers and milk, or some soup, or something +else that you think doesn't count! + +I recommend a dose of laxative to clean out the system at the beginning +of a fast, because the bowels are apt to become sluggish at once, and +the quicker you get the system cleansed, the better. It does no good to +take laxatives if you are going to pile in more food, but if you are +going to fast, that is a different matter. You should take a full warm +enema every day during the fast, so long as it brings any results. There +are some people whose bowels are so frightfully clogged that I have +known the enema to bring results even in the second and third weeks. On +the other hand, if there is no solid matter to be removed, a small enema +every day will suffice. Take a warm bath every day; and needless to say, +you should get all the fresh air you can, and should sleep as much as +you can. You may have difficulty in sleeping, because the fast is apt to +make you nervous and wakeful. I have known people who could not fast +because they could not sleep, and I have taught them a little trick, to +put a hot water bottle at the feet, and another on the abdomen, to draw +the blood away from the head. So they would quickly fall asleep, and +they got great benefit from their fasts. + +You should supply yourself with good music if you can, and with plenty +of good reading matter. You will be amazed to find how active your mind +becomes; perhaps you had never known before what a mind you had. Your +blood has always been so clogged with food poisons that you didn't know +you could think. My three act play, "The Nature Woman," was conceived +and written in two days and a half on a fast; but I do not recommend +this kind of thing--on the contrary, I strongly urge against it, because +if you work your brain on a fast, you do not get the good from your +fast, and do not recover so quickly. Put off all your problems until you +have got your health back, and seek only to divert your mind while +fasting. + + + + +CHAPTER XXVI + +BREAKING THE FAST + + (Discusses various methods of building up the body after a fast, + especially the milk diet.) + + +There remains the question of how to break the fast, and this is the +most important part of the problem. You may undo all the good of your +fast by breaking it wrong, and you are a thousand times as apt to kill +yourself then, as while you are fasting. When your hunger comes back, it +comes back with a rush, and some people have not the will power to +control it. + +I do not advocate a complete fast in any case except of serious chronic +disease, and then only under the advice of someone with experience; but +I advocate a short fast of a week or ten days for almost every common +ailment, and I know that such a fast will help, even where it may not +completely cure. You may go on fasting so long as you are quiet and +happy; but when you find you are becoming too weak for comfort, or for +the peace of mind of your family physician and your friends, you may +break your fast, and show them that it is possible to restore your +strength and body weight, and then they won't bother so much when you +try it again! Take nothing but liquid foods in the breaking of a fast; I +recommend the juices of fruits and tomatoes, also meat broths. If you +have fasted a week or two, take a quarter of a glass; if you have fasted +a month, take a tablespoonful, and wait and see what the results are. +Remember that your whole alimentary tract is out of action, and give it +a chance to start up slowly. Take small quantities of liquid food every +two hours for the first day. Then you can begin taking larger +quantities, and on the next day you can try some milk, or a soft poached +egg, or the pulp of cooked apples or prunes. Do not take any solid food +until you are quite sure you can digest it, and then take only a very +little. Do not take any starchy food until the third day. + +I have known people to break these rules. I knew a man who broke his +fast on hamburg steak, and had to be helped out with a stomach pump. +Once I broke a week's fast with a plate of rich soup, because I was at a +friend's house and there was nothing else, and I yielded to the claims +of hospitality, and made myself ill and had to fast for several days +longer. + +The easiest way to break a fast is upon a milk diet. I have seen +hundreds of people take this diet, and very few who did not get benefit. +The first time I fasted, which was twelve days, I lost 17 pounds, and I +took the milk diet for 24 days thereafter, and gained 32 pounds. I took +it at MacFadden's Sanitarium, where I had every attention. Since then, I +have many times tried to take a milk diet by myself, but have never been +able to get it to agree with me. I do not know how to explain this fact; +I state it, to show how hard it is to lay down general rules. On the +milk diet you take into your system two or three times as much food as +you can assimilate, and this is a violation of all my diet rules; but it +appears that the bacteria which thrive in milk produce lactic acid, +which is not harmful to the system, and if you do not take other foods +you may safely keep the system flooded with milk. + +After a fast you should begin with small quantities of milk, and by the +third day you may be taking a full glass of warm milk every half hour or +every twenty minutes, until you have taken seven or eight quarts per +day. It is better to take it warm, but sometimes people take it just as +well without warming. Dr. Porter, who has a book on the milk diet, +insists upon complete rest, and makes his patients stay in bed. +MacFadden, on the other hand, recommends gymnastics in the morning +before the milk, and during the afternoon he recommends a rest from the +milk for a couple of hours, followed by abdominal exercises to keep the +bowels open. This is very important during a fast, because you are +taking great quantities of material into your system and it must not be +permitted to clog. Therefore take an enema daily, if necessary to a free +movement. Also take a warm bath daily. Take the juice of oranges and +lemons if you crave them. + +Upon one thing everyone who has had experience with the milk diet +agrees, and that is the necessity of absolute mental rest. If you +become excited, or nervous, or angry on a milk diet, you may turn all +the contents of your stomach into hard curds, and may put yourself into +convulsions. The wonderful thing about the milk diet is the state of +physical and mental bliss it makes possible. It is the ideal way of +breaking a fast, because it leaves you no chance to get hungry; you have +all the food you want, and your system is bathed in happiness, a sense +of peace and well-being which is truly marvelous and not to be +described. You gain anywhere from half a pound to two pounds a day, and +you feel that you have never before in your life known what perfect +health could be. The fast sets you a new standard, you discover how +nature meant you to enjoy life, and never again are you content with +that kind of half existence with which you managed to worry along before +you discovered this remedy. + +But let me hasten to add that I do not recommend the fast as a regular +habit of life. The fast is an emergency measure, to enable the body to +cleanse itself and to cure disease. When you have got your body clean +and free from disease, it is your business to keep it that way, and you +should apply your reason to the problem of how to live so that you will +not have to fast. If you find that you continue to have ailments, then +you must be eating wrongly, or overworking, or committing some other +offense against nature; either that, or else you must have some organic +trouble--a bone in your spine out of place, as the osteopaths tell you, +or your eyes out of focus, or your appendix twisted and infected. I do +not claim that the fasting cure will supplant the surgeons and the +oculists and the dentists. It will not mend your bones if you break +them, and it will not repair your teeth that are already decayed; but it +will help to keep your teeth from decaying in the future, and it will +help you to prepare for a surgical operation, and to recover from it +more quickly. I had to undergo an operation for rupture a couple of +years ago, and I fasted for two days before the operation, and for three +days after it, and I had no particle of nausea from the ether, and was +able to tend to my mail the day after the operation. + +There is one disease for which I hesitate to recommend the fast, and +that is tuberculosis, because I have been told of cases in which the +patient lost weight and did not recover it. However, in my tabulation +of 277 cases, you will note four cases of tuberculosis, and in my book +is given a letter from a patient who claimed great benefit. If I had the +misfortune to contract tuberculosis, I would take a three or four day +fast, followed by a milk diet for a long period. The milk diet is +pleasant to take, and it cannot possibly do any harm. If it did not +effect a cure, I would try the Salisbury treatment--that is, lean meat +ground up and medium cooked, and nothing else, except an abundance of +hot water between meals. Prof. Irving Fisher wrote me that there is +urgent need of experiment to determine proper diet in tuberculosis; and +until these experiments have been made, we can only grope. I am quite +sure that the "stuffing system," ordinarily used by doctors, is a tragic +mistake. + +In the case of any other disease whatever, even though I might take +medical or surgical treatment, I would supplement this by a fast, +because there is no kind of treatment which does not succeed better with +the blood in good condition. In the case of emergencies, accidents, +wounds, etc., I would rest assured that recovery would be more prompt if +I were fasting. When David Graham Phillips was shot, I wrote a letter to +the New York Call, saying that his doctors had killed him, because they +had fed him while he was lying in a critical condition in the hospital. +To take nutriment into the body under such circumstances is the greatest +of blunders. + +The fast will help children, just as it helps adults, only they do not +need to fast so long. It will help the aged and make them feel young. +(You need not be afraid to fast, no matter how old you are.) It is, of +course, an immediate cure for fatness, and strange as it may seem, it is +also a cure for unnatural thinness. People with ravenous appetites are +just as apt to be thin as to be fat, because it is not what you eat that +builds up your body, but only what you assimilate, and if you eat too +much, you can make it impossible to assimilate anything properly. If you +take a fast and break it carefully, your body will come to its normal +weight, and all your functions to their normal activity. + +A physician wrote me, taking me to task for listing among the cures +reported in my tabulation a case of locomotor ataxia. This disease, he +explained, is caused because a portion of a nerve has been entirely +destroyed, and it is a disease that is absolutely and positively and +forever incurable. I answered that I knew this to be the teaching of +present day medical science, but I invited him to consider for a moment +what happens in nature. When a crab loses a claw, we do not take it as a +matter of course that the crab must go about with one claw for the +balance of its life; nature will make that crab another claw. Man has +lost the power of replacing a lost leg, but he stills retains the power +of replacing tissue which has been cut away by a surgeon's knife, and +medical science takes this as a matter of course. How shall anybody say +that nature has forever lost the power of rebuilding a bit of nervous +tissue? How shall anyone say that if the blood-stream is cleansed of +poisons, and the energy of the whole body restored, one of the results +may not be the repairing of a broken nerve connection? I invite my +readers who have ailments, and especially I invite all medical men among +my readers, to make a fair test of the fasting cure. The results will +surprise them, and they will quickly be forced to revise their methods +of treating illness. + + + + +XXVII + +DISEASES AND CURES + + (Discusses some of the commoner human ailments, and what is known + about their cause and cure.) + + +I begin with the commonest of all troubles, known as a "cold." This name +implies that the cause of the trouble lies in exposure or chill. All the +grandmothers of the world are agreed about this. They have a phrase--or +at least they had it when I was a boy: "You will catch your death." +Every time I went out in the rain, every time I played with wet feet, or +sat in a draft, or got under a cold shower, I would hear the formula, +"You will catch your death." + +And, on the other hand, there are the "health cranks," who declare +vehemently that the name "cold" is a misnomer and a trap for people's +thoughts. Cold has nothing to do with it, they say, and point to arctic +explorers who frequently get frozen to death, but do not "catch cold" +until they get back into the warm rooms of civilization. As for drafts, +the "health cranks" aver that a draft is merely "fresh air moving"; +which is supposed to settle the matter. However, when you come to think +about it, you realize that a cyclone is likewise merely "fresh air +moving," so you have not decided the question by a phrase. + +While I was writing these chapters on health I contracted a severe +cold--which was a joke on me. The history of this cold is as clear in my +mind as anything human can be, and it will serve for an illustration, +showing how much truth the grandmothers have on their side, and how much +the "health cranks" have. + +To begin with, I had been overworking. All sorts of appeals come to me; +hundreds of people write me letters, and I cannot bear to leave them +unanswered. I accepted calls to speak, and invitations where I had to +eat a lot of stuff of which my reason disapproves; so one morning I woke +up with a slight sore throat. I fasted all day, and by evening felt all +right. But there came another call, and I consented to take a long +automobile ride on a cold and rainy night, and when I got back home, +after five or six hours, I was thoroughly chilled, and my "cold" came on +during the night. + +This explanation will, I imagine, be satisfactory to all the +grandmothers of the world. All the dear, good grandmothers know that an +automobile ride on a cold, rainy night is enough to give any man "his +death." But listen, grandmothers! I have lain out watching for deer all +night in the late fall, with only a thin blanket to cover me, and gotten +up so stiff with cold that I could hardly move; yet I did not "catch +cold." When I was a youth, I have ridden a bicycle twenty miles to the +beach in April, with snow on the ground, and plunged into the surf and +swam, and then ridden home again. I have bathed in the sea when I had to +run a quarter of a mile in a bathing suit along a frost-covered pier, +and with an icy wind blowing through my bones; yet I never took cold +from that, and never got anything but a feeling of exhilaration. So it +must be that there is some reason why exposure causes colds at one time +and not at another. + +The explanation takes you over to the "health cranks." They understand +that your blood-stream must be clogged, your bodily tone reduced by bad +air and lack of exercise, and more especially by over-eating, or by an +improperly balanced diet. But then most of them go to extremes, and +insist that the automobile ride and the chilled condition of my body had +nothing to do with my cold. But I know otherwise--I have watched the +thing happen so often. In times when I was run down, the slightest +exposure would cause me a cold, literally in a few minutes. I have got +myself a sore throat going out to the wood-pile on a winter day with +nothing on my head. I have got a cold by sitting still with wet feet, or +by sitting in a draft on a warm summer day, when I had been perspiring a +little. How to explain this I am not sure, but my guess is that you +drive the blood away from the surface of the body at a time when it is +weakened and exposed to infection, and you drive away the army of the +white corpuscles, and give the battlefield of your body to the germs. + +I know there are nature curists who argue that germs have nothing to do +with disease; but they have never been able to convince me--germs are +too real, and too many, and too easy to watch. If you leave a piece of +meat exposed to the air in warm temperature, the germs in the air will +settle upon it and begin to feed upon it and to multiply; the meat, +being dead, is powerless to protect itself. But your nose and throat are +also meat, and just as good food for the germs. The only difference is +that this meat is alive, there is a living blood-stream circulating +through it, and several score billions of the body's own kind of germs, +the blood corpuscles. If these blood corpuscles are sound and properly +nourished, and are brought to the place of infection, they are able to +destroy all the common germs; so it is that you do not have diseases, +but instead have health. But your health always implies a struggle of +your organism against other organisms, and it is the business of your +reason to watch your body and give all the help you can in protecting +it. Coughs and colds, sore throats and headaches, are the first warnings +that your defenses are being weakened. As a rule these ailments are not +serious in themselves, but they are signs of a wrong condition, and if +you neglect this condition, pretty soon you will find that you have to +deal with something deadly. + +My cure for a cold is to take an enema and a laxative, eat nothing for +twenty-four hours, and drink plenty of water. If you have a severe cold +or sore throat, you will be wise to lie in bed for a day or two, by an +open window. You may also use sprays and gargles if you wish, but you +will find them of little use, because the germs are deep in your mucous +membranes, and cannot all be reached from the outside. In the old sad +days of my ignorance I would get a cold, and go to the doctor, and have +my throat and nose pumped full of black and green and yellow and purple +liquids, which did me absolutely no good whatever; the cold would stay +on for two or three weeks, sometimes for eight or ten weeks, and I would +be miserable, utterly desperate. I was dying by inches, and not one of +the doctors could tell me why. + +The next most common ailment is a headache, and this means poisons in +your blood-stream. It may be from improper diet, from alcohol, or drugs, +or bad air, or nervous excitement. If it is none of these things, then +you should begin to look for some organic difficulty, eye-strain, for +example, or perhaps defects in the spine. The osteopaths and the +chiropractors specialize on the spine, and have made important +discoveries. Their doctrine is, in brief, that the nervous force which +directs the blood-stream is carried to the organs of the body by nerves +which leave the spinal cord through openings between the vertebrae. If +any of these openings are pinched, you have a diminished nerve supply, +which means ill-health in that part of the body to which the nerve +leads. That such trouble can be corrected by straightening the bones of +the spine, seems perfectly reasonable; but like most people with a new +idea, the discoverers proceed to carry it to absurd extremes. I have +before me an official chiropractic pamphlet which states that vertebral +displacement is "the physical and perpetuating cause of ninety-five per +cent of all cases of disease; the remaining five per cent being due to +subluxations of other skeletal segments." Naturally people who believe +this will devote nearly all their study to the bones and the nervous +system. But surely, there are other parts of your body which are +necessary besides bones and nerves! And what if some of these parts +happen to be malformed or defective? What if your eyes do not focus +properly, and you are continually wearing out the optic nerve, thus +giving yourself headaches and neurasthenia? What if you have an appendix +that has been twisted and malformed from birth, and is a center of +infection so long as it remains in the body? + +Several years ago I had an experience with the appendix, from which I +learned something about one of the commonest of human ailments, +constipation, or sluggishness of the bowels. This is a cause of +innumerable chronic ailments grouped under the head of auto-intoxication, +or the poisoning of the body by the absorption into the system of the +products of fermentation and decay in the bowels. The bowels should move +freely two or three times every day, and the movements should be soft. I +suffered from constipation for some twenty years, and tried, I think, +every remedy known both to science and to crankdom. In the beginning the +doctors gave me drugs which by irritating the intestinal walls cause +them to pour out quantities of water, and hurry the irritating +substances down the intestinal tract. That is all right for an +emergency; if you have swallowed a poison, or food which is spoiled, or +if you have overeaten and are ill, get your system cleaned out by any +and every device. But if you habitually swallow mild poisons, which is +what all laxatives are, you weaken the intestinal tract, and you have to +take more and more of these poisons, and you get less results. We may +set down as positive the statement that drugs are not a remedy for +constipation. + +Next comes diet. Eat the rough and bulky foods, say the nature curists, +and stimulate the intestinal walls to activity. I tried that. I listened +to the extreme enthusiasts, and boiled whole wheat and ate it, and +consumed quantities of bran biscuit, and of a Japanese seaweed which Dr. +Kellogg prepares, and of petroleum oil, and even the skins of oranges, +which are most uncomfortable eating, I assure you. I would eat things +like this until I got myself a case of diarrhea--and so was cured of +constipation for a time! Strange as it may seem to you, there are even +people who tell you to eat sand. I listened to them, and ate many +quarts. + +Then there is exercise. MacFadden taught me a whole series of exercises +for developing the muscles of the abdominal walls and the back, which +are greatly neglected by civilized man. The fundamental cause of +constipation is a sluggish life, and to exercise our bodies is a duty; +but to me it was always an agony of boredom to lie on a bed and wiggle +my abdomen for a quarter of an hour. The same thing applies to hot water +treatments, which are effective, but a nuisance and a waste of time. I +never could keep them up except when I was in trouble. + +Three or four years ago I began to notice a continual irritating pain in +my right side, which I quickly realized must lie in the appendix. I +tried massage, and hot and cold water treatments, and my favorite +remedy, a week's fast. The pain disappeared, but it returned, so finally +I decided, to the dismay of my physical culture friends, to have the +appendix out. For years I had been reading the statements of nature +curists, that the appendix is an important and vital part of the body, +which pours an oil or something into the intestinal tract, and so helps +to prevent constipation. Well, evidently my appendix wasn't doing its +job, so I took it to a good surgeon. What I found was that it had been +twisted and malformed from birth, so that it was a center of continuous +infection. From the time I had that operation, I have never had to think +about the subject of constipation. This experience suggests to me how +easy it is for people to make statements about health which have no +relationship to facts. + +I do not recommend promiscuous surgery, and I perfectly well realize +that if human beings would take proper care of their health, the great +proportion of surgical operations would be unnecessary. I realize, +also, that surgeons get paid by the job, and therefore have a money +interest in operating, and it is perfectly futile to expect that none of +them will ever be influenced by the profit motive. Nevertheless, it is +true that sometimes surgical operations are necessary, and that by +standing a little temporary inconvenience you can save yourself a +life-time of discomfort. + +Take, for example, rupture. The human body has here a natural weakness, +from which there results a dangerous and uncomfortable affliction. +Hundreds of thousands of men are going around all their lives wearing +elaborate and expensive trusses which are almost, if not entirely +useless, and trying advertised "cures" which are entirely fakes. An +operation takes an hour or two, and two or three weeks in bed, and when +our government drafted its young men into the army and found that +fourteen in every thousand of them had rupture, it shipped them into the +hospitals wholesale and sewed them up. It happens that rupture affords +one case where scar tissue is stronger than natural tissue, and there +were practically no returns from the great number of army cases. + +Likewise you find extreme statements repeated concerning the evils of +vaccination; but if you will read Parkman's "History of the Jesuits in +North America," you will see the horrible conditions under which the +Indians lived in the United States--noble savages, you understand, +entirely uncontaminated by civilized white men, and whole populations +regularly wiped out every few years by epidemics of smallpox. That these +epidemics ceased was due to the discovery that by infecting the body +with a mild form of the disease, it could be made to develop substances +which render it immune to the deadly form. Here in California we have a +law which makes vaccination for school children optional, and so we may +some day have another epidemic to test the theories of the +anti-vaccinationists. + +I know, of course, the dreadful stories of people who have been given +syphilis and other diseases by impure vaccines. I don't know whether +such stories are true; but I do know that people who live in houses are +sometimes killed by earthquakes and by lightning, yet we do not cease to +live in houses because of this chance. It seems to me that the remedy +for such vaccination evils is not to abolish vaccination, but to take +more care in the manufacture of our vaccines. + +This danger is removed by using vaccines which are sterile, and are made +especially for each person. Germs are taken from the sick person, and +injected into an animal. The body of the animal develops with great +rapidity the "anti-bodies" necessary to resistance to the germs; and as +these "anti-bodies" are chemical products, not affected by heat, we can +take a serum from the animal, sterilize it, and then inject it into the +system of the patient, thus increasing resistance to the disease. I +admit that the best way to increase such resistance is to take care of +your health; but sometimes we confront an emergency, and must use +emergency remedies. We have serums that really cure diphtheria and +meningitis, and one that will prevent lock-jaw; anyone who has ever seen +with his own eyes how the deadly membranes of diphtheria melt away as a +result of an injection, will be less dogmatic about the efforts of +science to combat disease. + +Of course it is much pleasanter if you can destroy the source of the +disease, and keep it from getting into the human body. Every few years +the southern part of our country used to be devastated by yellow fever +epidemics. Every kind of weird and fantastic remedy was tried; people +would go around with sponges full of vinegar hung under their noses; +they would burn the clothing and bedding of those who died of the +disease; they would wear gloves when they went shopping, so as not to +touch the money with their hands. But at last medical experimenters +traced the disease to a certain kind of mosquito, and now, if we drain +the swamps and screen our houses and stay in doors after sundown, we do +not get yellow fever, nor malaria either. In the same way, if we keep +our bodies clean with soap and hot water, we do not get bitten by lice, +and so do not die of typhus. If we take pains with our drains and water +supply, so that human excrement does not get into it, and if we destroy +the filth-carrying housefly, we do not have epidemics of typhoid. + +But under conditions of battle it is not possible for men to take these +precautions, and so when they go into the army they get a dose of +typhoid serum. And this illustrates the difference between a true or +hygienic remedy for disease, and a temporary or emergency remedy. If you +say that you want to abolish war, and with it the need for typhoid +vaccination, I cheerfully agree with you in this. All that I am trying +to do is to point out the folly of flying to extremes, and rejecting any +remedy which may help. What is the use of making the flat statement that +vaccinations and serums never aid in the cure of disease, when any man +can see with his own eyes the proof that they do? In the Spanish war, +before typhoid vaccination, many times more soldiers died of this +disease than died of bullets; but in the late war there was practically +no typhoid at all in the army camps. On the other hand, it was noticed +that the men who had just come in, and who therefore had just been +vaccinated, were considerably more susceptible to influenza; which shows +that vaccination does reduce the body condition for a time. The reader +may say that in this case I am trying to sit on both sides of the fence; +but the truth is that I am trying to keep an open mind, and to consider +all the facts, and to avoid making rash statements. + +One of the statements you hear most frequently is that drugs can never +remedy disease, or help in remedying it. Now, I abhor the drugging +system of the orthodox medical men; I have talked with them, and heard +them talk with one another, and I know that they will mix up half a +dozen different substances, in the vague hope that some one of them will +have some effect. Even when they know definitely the effects they are +producing, they are in many cases merely suppressing symptoms. On the +other hand, however, it is a fact that medical science has had for a +generation or two a specific which destroys the germs of one disease in +the blood, without at the same time injuring the blood itself. That +disease is malaria, and the drug is quinine. Of course, the way to avoid +malaria is to drain the swamps; but you cannot do that all at once, nor +can you always screen your house and stay in at sundown. When you first +go into a country, you have no house to screen, and some emergency will +certainly arise that exposes you to mosquito bites. So you will need +quinine, and will be foolish not to use it, and know how to use it. + +Recently medical chemists discovered another remedy, this time for +syphilis. It is called salvarsan, and while it does not always cure, it +frequently does. In laboratories today men are working over the problem +of constructing a combination of molecules which will destroy the germ +of sleeping sickness, without at the same time injuring the blood. If +they find it, they will save hundreds of millions of lives. I do not see +why we cannot recognize such a possibility, while at the same time +making use of physical culture, of diet and fasting. + +When the manuscript of this book was sent to the printer, there appeared +in this place a paragraph telling of the work of Dr. Albert Abrams of +San Francisco, in the diagnosis and cure of disease by means of +radio-active vibrations. As the book is going to press, the writer finds +himself in San Francisco, attending Dr. Abrams' clinics; and so he finds +it possible to give a more extended account of some fascinating +discoveries, which seem destined to revolutionize medical science. If I +were to tell all that I have seen with my own eyes in the last twelve +days, I fear the reader would find his powers of credulity +overstretched, so I shall content myself with trying to tell, in very +sober and cautious language, the theory upon which Abrams is working, +and the technic which he has evolved. + +Modern science has demonstrated that all matter is simply the activity +of electrons, minute particles of electric force. This is a statement +which no present-day physicist would dispute. The best evidence appears +to indicate that a molecule of matter is a minute reproduction of the +universe, a system of electrons whirling about a central nucleus. No eye +has ever beheld an electron, for it is billions of times smaller than +anything the microscope makes visible; but we can see the effects of +electronic activity, and all modern books of physics give photographs of +such. It is possible to determine the vibration rates of electrons, and +to Dr. Abrams occurred the idea of determining the vibration rates of +diseased tissue and disease germs. He discovered that it was invariably +the same; not merely does all cancerous material, for example, yield the +same rate, but the blood of a person suffering from cancer yields that +rate, at all times and under all circumstances. The vibration of cancer, +of tuberculosis, of syphilis--each is different, uniform and invariable. +Likewise in the blood are other vibrations, uniform and dependable, +which reveal the sex and age of the patient, the virulence of the +disease and the period of its duration--yes, and even the location in +the body, if there be some definite infected area. So here is a modern +miracle, an infallible device for the diagnosis of disease. Dr. Abrams +does not have to see the patient; all he has to have is a drop of blood +on a piece of white blotting paper, and he sits in his laboratory and +tells all about it, and somewhere several thousand miles away--in +Toronto or Boston or New Orleans--a surgeon operates and finds what he +has been told is there! + +And that is only the beginning of the wonder; because, says Abrams, if +you know the vibration rate of the electrons of germs, you can destroy +those germs. It used to be a favorite trick of Caruso to tap a glass and +determine its musical note, and then sing that note at the glass and +shatter it to bits. It is well known that horses, trotting swiftly on a +bridge, have sometimes coincided in their step with the vibration of the +bridge and thus have broken it down. On that same principle this wizard +of the electron introduces into your body radio-activity of a certain +rate--and shall I say that he cures cancer and syphilis and tuberculosis +of many years standing in a few treatments? I will not say that, because +you would not and could not believe me. I will content myself with +telling what my wife and I have been watching, twice a day for the past +twelve days. + +The scene is a laboratory, with rows of raised seats at one side for the +physicians who attend the clinic. There is a table, with the instruments +of measurement, and Dr. Abrams sits beside it, and before him stands a +young man stripped to the waist. The doctor is tapping upon the abdomen +of this man, and listening to the sounds. You will find this the +weirdest part of the whole procedure, for you will naturally assume that +this young man is being examined, and will be dazed when some one +explains that the patient is in Toronto or Boston or New Orleans, and +that this young man's body is the instrument which the doctor uses in +the determining of the vibration rates of the patient's blood. Dr. +Abrams tried numerous instruments, but has been able to find nothing so +sensitive to electronic activity as a human body. He explains to his +classes that the spinal cord is composed of millions of nerve fibres of +different vibration rates; hence a certain rate communicated to the +body, is automatically sorted out, and appears on a certain precise spot +of the body in the form of increased activity, increased blood pressure +in the cells, and hence what all physicians know as a "dull area," which +can be discovered by what is known as "percussion," a tapping with a +finger. To map out these areas is merely a matter of long and patient +experiment; and Abrams has been studying this subject for some twenty +years--he is author of a text-book on what is known as the "reactions +of Abrams." So now he provides the world with a series of maps of the +human body; and he sits in front of his "subject," and his assistant +places a specimen of blood in a little electrically connected box, and +sets the rheostat at some vibration number--say fifty--and Dr. Abrams +taps on a certain square inch of the abdomen of his "subject," and +announces the dread word "cancer." Then he places the electrode on +another part of the "subject's" body, and taps some more, and announces +that it is cancer of the small intestine, left side; some more tapping, +and he announces that its intensity is twelve ohms, which is severe; and +pretty soon there is speeding a telegram to the physician who has sent +this blood specimen, telling him these facts, and prescribing a certain +vibration rate upon the "oscilloclast," the instrument of radio-activity +which Dr. Abrams has devised. + +Now, you watch this thing for an hour or two, and you say to yourself: +"Here is either the greatest magician in the history of mankind, or else +the greatest maniac." You may have come prepared for some kind of fraud, +but you soon dismiss that, for you realize that this man is desperately +in earnest about what he is doing, and so are all the physicians who +watch him. So you seek refuge in the thought that he must be deluding +himself and them, perhaps unconsciously. But you talk with these men, +and discover that they have come from all over the country, and always +for one reason--they had sent blood specimens to Abrams, and had found +that he never made a mistake; he told them more from a few drops of the +patient's blood than they themselves had been able to find out from the +whole patient. And then into the clinic come the doctor's own +patients--I must have heard sixty or eighty of them tell their story and +many of them have been lifted from the grave. People ten years blind +from syphilis who can see; people operated on several times for cancer +and given up for dying; people with tumors on the brain, or with one +lung gone from tuberculosis. It is literally a fact that when you have +sat in Abrams' clinic for a week, all disease loses its terrors. + +This, you see, is really the mastery of life. If we can measure and +control the minute universe of the electron and the atom, we have +touched the ultimate source of our bodily life. I might take chapters of +this book to tell you of the strange experiments I have seen in this +clinic--showing you, for instance, how these vibrations respond to +thought, how by denying to himself the disease the patient can for a +few moments cancel in his body the activity of the harmful germs; +showing how the reactions differ in the different sexes and at different +ages, and how they respond to different colors and different drugs. +Abrams' method has revealed the secret of such efficacy as drugs +possess--their work is done by their radio-activity, and not by their +chemical properties. Also the problem of vaccination has been +solved--for Abrams has discovered a dread new disease, which is bovine +syphilis, originally caused in cattle by human inoculation, and now +reintroduced in the human being by vaccination, and becoming the agent +which prepares the soil of the body for such disorders as tuberculosis +and cancer. And it appears that we can all be rendered immune to these +diseases, by a few electronic vibrations, introduced into our bodies in +childhood; so is opened up to our eyes a wonderful vision of a new race, +purified and made fit for life. So here at last is science justified of +her optimism, and our faith in human destiny forever vindicated. Take my +advice, whoever you may be that are suffering, and find out about this +new work and help to make it known to the world. + +There are many romances of medical science, some of them fascinating as +murder mysteries and big game hunting. Turn to McMasters' "History of +the People of the United States" and read his account of the terrible +epidemic of yellow fever in Philadelphia a hundred years ago; I have +already referred to the weird and incredible things the people did in +their effort to ward off this plague--sponges of vinegar under their +noses and "fever fires" burning in the streets; and then a mosquito +would fly up and bite them, and in a few hours they would be dead! Or +what could be stranger than the tracing of the bubonic plague, which has +cost literally billions of human lives, to a parasite in the blood of +fleas which live on the bodies of rats! Or what could be more unexpected +than the tracing of our rheumatic aches and twinges to the root canals +of the teeth! + +One of the common ailments which afflict poor humanity is rheumatism, a +cause of endless suffering. It was supposed to be due to damp climate +and exposure, and this is true to a certain extent, in the same way that +colds are due to exposure. But the investigators realized that there +must be some bodily condition rendering one susceptible, and they set to +work to trace this condition down. The pains of rheumatism are caused by +uric acid settling in the joints of the body. What causes the uric +acid? Well, there is uric acid in red meat, so let us forbid rheumatic +people to eat it! But this is overlooking the fact that the human body +itself is a uric acid factory; and also the fact that uric acid taken +into the stomach may not remain uric acid by the time it gets to the +blood-stream. We know that you may eat a great deal of fruit acid +without necessarily making acid blood. On the other hand, you can make +acid blood by eating a lot of sugar! So you see it isn't as simple as it +sounds. + +Rheumatism has been traced to its lair, which is found to be the roots +of the teeth. Here is a part of the body difficult to get at, and as a +consequence of bad diet and unwholesome ways of living, infections will +start there, and pus sacs be formed, and the poisons absorbed into the +blood-stream and distributed through the body. The first thought is to +draw the infected teeth; but that is a serious matter, because you need +your teeth to chew your food. So the dentist has to go through a +complicated process of opening up the tooth and cleaning out the root +canals, and treating the infected spots at the roots. Then he has to +fill the tooth all the way down to the roots, leaving no place for +infection to gather. This, of course, takes time and costs money, and is +one more illustration of the fact that there is one health law for the +rich and another health law for the poor. + +All the time that I write these chapters about health I feel guilty. I +know that the wholesome food I recommend costs money, and I know that +surgery and dentistry cost money--yes, even sunlight and fresh air and +recreation; even a fast, because you have to rest while you take it, and +you have to have a roof over your head, and warmth in winter time, and +somebody to wait upon you when you are weak. I know that for a great +many of the people who read what I write, all these things are +impossible of attainment; I know that for the great majority of the +common people the benefits of science do not exist. Science discovers +how to prevent disease, but the discoveries are not applied, because the +profit system controls the world, and the profit system wants the labor +of the poor, regardless of what happens to their health. If the people +fall ill, they are thrown upon the scrap heap, and the profit system +finds others to take their place. + +Take, for example, tuberculosis. Tuberculosis is a germ infection, but +it practically never gets hold upon a human body except when the body is +reduced by undernourishment and lack of fresh air. Tuberculosis, +therefore, is a disease of slums and jails. It is definitely and +indisputably a disease of poverty. It could be wiped off the face of the +earth in a single generation; and the same is true of typhus and +typhoid. There is another whole host of ailments which could be wiped +out by measures of public hygiene, plus education. This includes all the +infant diseases, and the deadly venereal diseases. But the profit system +stands in the way; and so, in these closing paragraphs of this Book of +the Body, I say that there is one disease which is the deadliest of all, +and the source of all others, and that disease is poverty. + +I know a certain physician to the rich, who is an honest and +conscientious man. He said, "I loath my work. I am wasting my time. I am +called in by these fat, over-fed rich people in their leisure class +hotels, and what am I to say to them? Shall I say to them, 'You are +living an abnormal life, and you can never be well until you cut out +root and branch all your habits of self indulgence which are destroying +you?' But no, I can't say that--not one time in a thousand. I am +expected to be polite and serious, and to listen to them while they tell +the long tiresome story of their symptoms, and I have to encourage them, +and give them some temporary device that will remove some of the +symptoms of their trouble." + +And what should one say to this honest physician? Should one tell him to +go and be a physician to the poor? Would he be any happier there? He +could tell the poor the causes of their diseases, and they would listen +patiently--they are trained to listen, and to accept what they are told. +Here is a girl living in an inside bedroom in a tenement, and working +ten or eleven hours a day in an unventilated factory, and she is ill +with tuberculosis. The physician tells her that she needs plenty of +fresh air and rest, and a lot of eggs and milk in her diet. He tells her +that, and he knows that she has as much chance of carrying out his +orders as of flying to the moon. Or maybe he comes upon a typhoid +epidemic, and discovers, as happened to a friend of mine in Chicago, +that there is defective plumbing in some houses owned by the political +leader of the district. Or maybe it is a case of venereal disease, in a +young man who was drafted into the army and turned loose amid the joys +of Paris. Maybe it is just a commonplace, every-day story of a room full +of school children, 22 per cent of them undernourished, as is the case +in New York City, and the parents out of work a part of the time, and +with no possibility in their lives of ever earning enough to feed the +children properly. When you confront these universal facts of our +present social order, you realize that the problem of disease is not +merely a problem of the body, but is a problem of the mind as well; a +problem of politics and religion and philosophy, of the whole way of +thinking of the so-called civilized world. A book of health which did +not point out these facts would be, not a book of health, but a book of +sham. + +But meantime, while we are trying to change the world's ideas, we have +to live, and we can do our work better if we keep as well as possible. I +have tried to point out the way; it is, as you can see, a matter in part +of the body and in part of the mind. All the bodily regime here laid out +has its basis in mental habits; all wise and wholesome ways of life can, +at the age when our minds are plastic, be made into "second +nature"--things which we do automatically, without effort or temptation +to do otherwise. This is the real secret of true happiness in the +conduct of our personal lives; to acquire self-control, to rule our +desires and our passions, not harshly and spasmodically, but serenely, +as one drives a car which he thoroughly understands. It is in vain that +we preach freedom to men who have not this self-mastery; as the poet +tell us: "The sensual and the dark rebel in vain, slaves of their own +compulsion." And of all the personal possessions which man can attain on +this earth, the most precious is the one of a sound mind controlling a +sound body. I close this book by quoting some verses written by Sir +Henry Wotton three hundred years ago, which I have all my life +considered one of the noblest pieces of poetry in our heritage: + + THE CHARACTER OF A HAPPY LIFE + + How happy is he born and taught + That serveth not another's will; + Whose armour is his honest thought + And simple truth his utmost skill! + + Whose passions not his masters are, + Whose soul is still prepared for death, + Not tied unto the world with care + Of public fame, or private breath. + + Who envies none that chance doth raise + Or vice; who never understood + How deepest wounds are given by praise; + Nor rules of state, but rules of good: + + Who hath his life from rumours freed, + Whose conscience is his strong retreat; + Whose state can neither flatterers feed, + Nor ruin make accusers great: + + Who God doth late and early pray + More of His grace than gifts to lend; + And entertains the harmless day + With a well-chosen book or friend; + + --This man is freed from servile bands + Of hope to rise, or fear to fall; + Lord of himself, though not of lands; + And having nothing, yet hath all. + + + + +INDEX + + +Abrams, Dr., 190 + +Adultery, 33 + +Adventist, 99 + +Agriculture, 25 + +Alcohol, 151 + +Anti-bodies, 188 + +Antinomies, 58 + +Appendix, 186 + +Arnold, 42 + +Arrhenius, 101 + +Automatic writing, 67 + + +Bairnsfather, 29 + +Bathing, 162 + +Battle Creek Sanitarium, 118 + +Beauchamp, 70, 85, 89 + +Beethoven, 47 + +Bergson, 17 + +Beri-beri, 128 + +Bible, 77 + +Bio-chemist, 59 + +Black bread, 128 + +Blood, 106 + +Body, 53, 105 + +Booth, 58 + +Bourne, 69 + +Bruce, 71 + +Bury, 15 + + +Caffein, 150 + +Calories, 135 + +Candy, 137 + +Capitalist, 100 + +Carbohydrates, 124 + +Carbon monoxide, 157 + +Children, 140, 180 + +Chiropractors, 174, 184 + +Chittenden, 136 + +Christian Scientists, 5, 65, 105 + +Clothing, 160 + +Coffee, 151 + +Colds, 183 + +Commandments, 32 + +Communist, 99 + +Complete fast, 172 + +Comstock, 25 + +Conduct, 42 + +Consciousness, 56 + +Constipation, 185 + +Cooking, 129, 142 + +Crawford, 88 + +Cyrus, 164 + + +Dandruff, 109 + +Dante, 77 + +Darwin, 17, 46 + +Dentistry, 126, 190 + +Determinists, 57 + +Diet, 131 + +Diet Standards, 135 + +Digestion, 145 + +Diphtheria, 188 + +Diseases, 107, 117 + +Dogs, 17 + +Draft, 182 + +Drugs, 118, 150, 185, 189 + +Dubb, 63 + +Duncan, 102 + +Dyspepsia, 117 + + +Eddy, 65 + +Edison, 45, 86 + +Einstein, 101 + +Elberfeld horses, 68 + +Evolution, 8, 17 + +Exercise, 163 + + +Faith, 9 + +Faith curists, 65 + +Fast cure, 171 + +Fatness, 139 + +Fats, 124 + +Fever, 108 + +Fireless cooker, 142 + +Fireplace, 157 + +Fisher, 136 + +Fletcher, 119, 145 + +Food filter, 145 + +Fourth dimension, 5 + +Free thinker, 15 + +Freud, 71 + +Fruit fast, 175 + +Frugality, 38 + +Frying-pan, 129 + +Furnace, 157 + + +Gargles, 184 + +Gastronomic art, 148 + +Genius, 49, 60 + +George, 18 + +Germs, 183 + +God, 22, 50 + +Goethe, 47 + +Golden rule, 51 + +Greens, 132 + +Gymnastic work, 166 + + +Hair, 109 + +Hallucinations, 75 + +Hamlet, 48 + +Happiness, 9 + +Harrison, 6 + +Hats, 110 + +Headache, 122, 150, 184 + +Health cranks, 182 + +Heart, 108 + +Houdin, 93 + +Hugo, 48 + +Huxley, 17, 62 + +Hyslop, 82 + + +Iceberg, 61 + +Infanticide, 28 + +Instincts, 134 + +Intelligence, 22 + +Immortality, 79 + +Irwin, Will, 86 + + +James, 30, 59, 60 + +Jesus, 47, 48, 50, 51, 76 + +John Barleycorn, 152 + +Johnson, 58 + +Jonson, 44 + + +Kant, Immanuel, 4, 47, 51, 58 + +Kellogg, Doctor, 118, 164, 186 + +Kilmer, Joyce, 44 + +Knowledge, 94 + +Kropotkin, 18, 26 + + +Langley, 74 + +Lankester, Prof. E. Ray, 23 + +Laxatives, 175, 185 + +Leanness, 139 + +Leonardo, 47 + +Liebault, 64 + +Life, 3 + +Lily Dale, 86, 90 + +Lincoln, 47 + +Locomotor ataxia, 180 + +Lodge, Sir Oliver, 83 + +Lodge, Raymond, 87 + +London, Jack, 152 + + +Macaulay, 39 + +MacDowell, Edward, 56 + +MacFadden, 178, 186 + +MacSwiney, 170 + +Maeterlinck, Maurice, 68 + +Malaria, 189 + +Malthusian law, 25 + +Marquesans, 113 + +Materializations, 88 + +Matter, 3 + +Meal-hour, 147 + +Measurement of Intelligence, Terman's, 95 + +Meat, 121 + +Medical science, 105 + +Mesmer, 63 + +Messina earthquake, 170 + +Metaphysics, 4 + +Metchnikoff, 138 + +Milk diet, 128 + +Moderation, 39 + +Monism, 3 + +Morality, 21, 31, 34, 50 + +Morgan, 45 + +Mormon, 99 + +Mozart, 68 + +Multiple personality, 69 + +Mutation, 17 + +Myers, 49 + + +Nature, 21, 24, 29 + +Nature cure, 160 + +Nature Woman, 176 + +Neighbor, 50 + +Newcomb, Simon, 101 + +Newton, 47 + +New York Times, 169 + +Nicotine, 154 + +Nietzsche, 17 + +Novels, 164 + +Nutrition of Man, 136 + + +Oil stoves, 158 + +Opsonins, 112 + +Optimism, 42 + +Osteopaths, 184 + +Ouija, 67 + +Overeating, 134 + +Oxygen, 156 + + +Patrick, Dr., 167 + +Pavlov, 148 + +Phantasms, 75 + +Phillips, David Graham, 180 + +Piper, Mrs., 68 + +Play, 165 + +Poisons, 146 + +Pork, 142 + +Porter, Dr., 178 + +Positivists, 6 + +Poverty, 194 + +Prices of food, 141 + +Prince, Dr. Morton, 70, 89 + +Profits of Religion, 78, 99 + +Proteins, 123 + +Prunes, 127 + +Psychology, 96 + +Psychotherapy, 64 + +Puritans, 39 + + +Quackenbos, 64 + +Quinine, 188 + +Quixote, 48 + + +Raisins, 127 + +Raw food, 119 + +Read, Alfred Baker, 28 + +Reason, 13 + +Refined foods, 126 + +Relaxation, 167 + +Religion, 32 + +Reincarnation, 76 + +Rest, 146 + +Revelation, 12 + +Rheumatism, 193 + +Rice, 128 + +Rockefeller, 45 + +Roosevelt, Theodore, 25, 45 + +Rugs, 159 + +Rupture, 187 + + +Sabbath, 99 + +Salisbury, 120 + +Sally, 70, 85 + +Salt, 143 + +Meats, salted, 143 + +Salts, 124 + +Salvarsan, 189 + +Savages, 135 + +Savage, Rev. Minot J., 74 + +Schrenck-Notzing, 88 + +Scurvy, 128 + +Seneca, 98 + +Shakespeare, 47 + +Shelley, 45, 48 + +Sleep, 162 + +Sleeping sickness, 113, 173 + +Smokers, 153 + +Socialism, 167 + +Sophocles, 87 + +Sore throat, 183 + +Spencer, 8 + +Spinoza, 79 + +Spirits, 82 + +Spiritualists, 86 + +Starch, 122, 124 + +Stealing, 33 + +Steam heat, 158 + +Stimulant, 149 + +Stock Exchange, 158 + +Stomach, 105, 138, 148 + +Style, 161 + +Subconscious mind, 61 + +Sunday code, 40 + +Sugar, 126 + +Surgery, 186 + +Survival, 81 + +Survival of the fittest, 22 + +Syndicalism, 15 + +Syphilis, 189 + + +Tanner, Dr., 169 + +Tariff, 37 + +Tea, 151 + +Teeth, 127, 193 + +Telepathy, 67, 75 + +Theosophists, 76 + +Tight shoes, 161 + +Tobacco, 153 + +Tolstoi, 49 + +Tonsilitis, 107 + +Trance, 63 + +Tropism, 54 + +Tuberculosis, 112, 120, 179, 194, 195 + +Twain, Mark, 93 + +Typhoid, 112, 188, 192 + + +Uranus, 92 + +Uric acid, 193 + + +Vaccination, 187, 189 + +Vaccines, 188 + +Vegetarian, 121 + +Vitamines, 127, 142 + + +Wallace, 46 + +Wells, H. G., 22 + +Williams, Dr. Henry Smith, 102 + +Worth, Patience, 84 + + +Yellow fever, 188 + +Yogis, 90 + + + + +THE BOOK OF LIFE + +VOLUME TWO: LOVE AND SOCIETY + + _To_ + Kate Crane Gartz +in acknowledgment of her unceasing efforts for a +better world, and her fidelity to those + who struggle to achieve it. + + + + +CONTENTS + +PART THREE: THE BOOK OF LOVE + + PAGE + +CHAPTER XXVIII. THE REALITY OF MARRIAGE 3 +Discusses the sex-customs now existing in the world, +and their relation to the ideal of monogamous love. + +CHAPTER XXIX. THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARRIAGE 8 +Deals with the sex-relationship, its meaning and its history, +the stages of its development in human society. + +CHAPTER XXX. SEX AND YOUNG AMERICA 15 +Discusses present-day sex arrangements, as they affect +the future generation. + +CHAPTER XXXI. SEX AND THE "SMART SET" 23 +Portrays the moral customs of those who set the fashion +in our present-day world. + +CHAPTER XXXII. SEX AND THE POOR 29 +Discusses prostitution, the extent of its prevalence, and +the diseases which result from it. + +CHAPTER XXXIII. SEX AND NATURE 33 +Maintains that our sex disorders are not the result of +natural or physical disharmony. + +CHAPTER XXXIV. LOVE AND ECONOMICS 36 +Maintains that our sex disorders are of social origin, due +to the displacing of love by money as a motive in mating. + +CHAPTER XXXV. MARRIAGE AND MONEY 40 +Discusses the causes of prostitution, and that higher +form of prostitution known as the "marriage of convenience." + +CHAPTER XXXVI. LOVE VERSUS LUST 46 +Discusses the sex impulse, its use and misuse; when it +should be followed and when repressed. + +CHAPTER XXXVII. CELIBACY VERSUS CHASTITY 51 + +The ideal of the repression of the sex-impulse, as against +the ideal of its guidance and cultivation. + +CHAPTER XXXVIII. THE DEFENSE OF LOVE 55 + +Discusses passionate love, its sanction, its place in life, +and its preservation in marriage. + +CHAPTER XXXIX. BIRTH CONTROL 60 + +Deals with the prevention of conception as one of the +greatest of man's discoveries, releasing him from nature's +enslavement, and placing the keys of life in his hands. + +CHAPTER XL. EARLY MARRIAGE 66 + +Discusses love marriages, how they can be made, and the +duty of parents in respect to them. + +CHAPTER XLI. THE MARRIAGE CLUB 71 + +Discusses how parents and elders may help the young to +avoid unhappy marriages. + +CHAPTER XLII. EDUCATION FOR MARRIAGE 75 + +Maintains that the art of love can be taught, and that +we have the right and the duty to teach it. + +CHAPTER XLIII. THE MONEY SIDE OF MARRIAGE 79 + +Deals with the practical side of the life partnership of +matrimony. + +CHAPTER XLIV. THE DEFENSE OF MONOGAMY 83 + +Discusses the permanence of love, and why we should +endeavor to preserve it. + +CHAPTER XLV. THE PROBLEM OF JEALOUSY 89 + +Discusses the question, to what extent one person may +hold another to the pledge of love. + +CHAPTER XLVI. THE PROBLEM OF DIVORCE 93 + +Defends divorce as a protection to monogamous love, and +one of the means of preventing infidelity and prostitution. + +CHAPTER XLVII. THE RESTRICTION OF DIVORCE 97 + +Discusses the circumstances under which society has the +right to forbid divorce, or to impose limitations upon it. + + +PART FOUR: THE BOOK OF SOCIETY + +CHAPTER XLVIII. THE EGO AND THE WORLD 103 + +Discusses the beginning of consciousness, in the infant +and in primitive man, and the problem of its adjustment +to life. + +CHAPTER XLVIX. COMPETITION AND CO-OPERATION 107 + +Discusses the relation of the adult to society, and +the part which selfishness and unselfishness play in the +development of social life. + +CHAPTER L. ARISTOCRACY AND DEMOCRACY 115 + +Discusses the idea of superior classes and races, and +whether there is a natural basis for such a doctrine. + +CHAPTER LI. RULING CLASSES 119 + +Deals with authority in human society, how it is obtained, +and what sanction it can claim. + +CHAPTER LII. THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION 122 + +Discusses the series of changes through which human +society has passed. + +CHAPTER LIII. INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION 126 + +Examines the process of evolution in industry and the +stage which it has so far reached. + +CHAPTER LIV. THE CLASS STRUGGLE 132 + +Discusses history as a battle-ground between ruling and +subject classes, and the method and outcome of this +struggle. + +CHAPTER LV. THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM 136 + +Shows how wealth is produced in modern society, and +the effect of this system upon the minds of the workers. + +CHAPTER LVI. THE CAPITALIST PROCESS 142 + +How profits are made under the present industrial +system and what becomes of them. + +CHAPTER LVII. HARD TIMES 145 + +Explains why capitalist prosperity is a spasmodic thing, +and why abundant production brings distress instead of +plenty. + +CHAPTER LVIII. THE IRON RING 148 +Analyzes further the profit system, which strangles production, +and makes true prosperity impossible. + +CHAPTER LIX. FOREIGN MARKETS 151 +Considers the efforts of capitalism to save itself by marketing +its surplus products abroad, and what results from +these efforts. + +CHAPTER LX. CAPITALIST WAR 155 +Shows how the competition for foreign markets leads +nations automatically into war. + +CHAPTER LXI. THE POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCTION 158 +Shows how much wealth we could produce if we tried +and how we proved it when we had to. + +CHAPTER LXII. THE COST OF COMPETITION 162 +Discusses the losses of friction in our productive machine, +those which are obvious and those which are +hidden. + +CHAPTER LXIII. SOCIALISM AND SYNDICALISM 166 +Discusses the idea of the management of industry by the +state, and the idea of its management by the trade unions. + +CHAPTER LXIV. COMMUNISM AND ANARCHISM 170 +Considers the idea of goods owned in common, and the +idea of a society without compulsion, and how these +ideas have fared in Russia. + +CHAPTER LXV. SOCIAL REVOLUTION 175 +How the great change is coming in different industries, +and how we may prepare to meet it. + +CHAPTER LXVI. CONFISCATION OR COMPENSATION 179 +Shall the workers buy out the capitalists? Can they +afford to do it, and what will be the price? + +CHAPTER LXVII. EXPROPRIATING THE EXPROPRIATORS 183 +Discusses the dictatorship of the proletariat, and its +chances for success in the United States. + +CHAPTER LXVIII. THE PROBLEM OF THE LAND 188 +Discusses the land values tax as a means of social readjustment, +and compares it with other programs. + +CHAPTER LXIX. THE CONTROL OF CREDIT 192 +Deals with money, the part it plays in the restriction of +industry, and may play in the freeing of industry. + +CHAPTER LXX. THE CONTROL OF INDUSTRY 198 +Discusses various programs for the change from industrial +autocracy to industrial democracy. + +CHAPTER LXXI. THE NEW WORLD 202 +Describes the co-operative commonwealth, beginning +with its money aspects; the standard wage and its variations. + +CHAPTER LXXII. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION 206 +Discusses the land in the new world, and how we foster +co-operative farming and co-operative homes. + +CHAPTER LXXIII. INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTION 210 +Discusses scientific, artistic, and religious activities, as +a superstructure built upon the foundation of the standard +wage. + +CHAPTER LXXIV. MANKIND REMADE 215 +Discusses human nature and its weaknesses, and what +happens to these in the new world. + + + + +PART THREE + +THE BOOK OF LOVE + + + + +CHAPTER XXVIII + +THE REALITY OF MARRIAGE + + (Discusses the sex-customs now existing in the world, and their + relation to the ideal of monogamous love.) + + +Just as human beings through wrong religious beliefs torture one +another, and wreck their lives and happiness; just as through wrong +eating and other physical habits they make disease and misery for +themselves; just so they suffer and perish for lack of the most +elementary knowledge concerning the sex relationship. The difference is +that in the field of religious ideas it is now permissible to impart the +truth one possesses. If I tell you there is no devil, and that believing +this will not cause you to suffer in an eternity of sulphur and +brimstone, no one will be able to burn me at the stake, even though he +might like to do so. If I advise you that it is not harmful to eat +beefsteak on Friday, or to eat thoroughly cooked pork any day of the +week, neither the archbishops nor the rabbis nor the vegetarians will be +able to lock me in a dungeon. But if I should impart to you the simplest +and most necessary bit of knowledge concerning the facts of your sex +life--things which every man and woman must know if we are to stop +breeding imbecility and degeneracy in the world--then I should be +liable, under federal statutes, to pay a fine of $5,000, and to serve a +term of five years in a federal penitentiary. Scarcely a week passes +that I do not receive a letter from someone asking for information about +such matters; but I dare not answer the letters, because I know there +are agencies, maintained and paid by religious superstition, employing +spies to trap people into the breaking of this law. + +I shall tell you here as much as I am permitted to tell, in the simplest +language and the most honest spirit. I believe that human beings are +meant to be happy on this earth, and to avoid misery and disease. I +believe that they are given the powers of intelligence in order to seek +the ways of happiness, and I believe that it is a worthy work to give +them the knowledge they need in order to find happiness. + +At the outset of this Book of Love we are going to examine the existing +facts of the sex relationships of men and women in present-day society. +We shall discover that amid all the false and dishonest thinking of +mankind, there is nowhere more falsity and dishonesty than here. The +whole world is a gigantic conspiracy of "hush," and the orthodox and +respectable of the world are like worshippers of some god, who spend +their day-time burning incense before the altar, and in the night-time +steal the sacred jewels and devour the consecrated offerings. These +worshippers confront you with the question, do you believe in marriage; +and they make the assumption that the institution of marriage exists, or +at some time has existed in the world. But if you wish to do any sound +thinking about this subject, you must get one thing clear at the outset; +the institution of marriage is an ideal which has been preached and +taught, but which has never anywhere, in any society, at any stage of +human progress, actually existed as the general practice of mankind. +What has existed and still exists is a very different institution, which +I shall here describe as marriage-plus-prostitution. + +By this statement I do not mean to deny that there are many women, and a +few men, who have been monogamous all their lives; nor that there are +many couples living together happily in monogamous marriage. What I mean +is that, considering society as a whole, wherever you find the +institution of marriage, you also find, co-existent therewith and +complementary thereto, the institution of prostitution. Of this double +arrangement one part is recognized, and written into the law; the other +part is hidden, and prohibited by law; but those who have to do with +enforcing the law all know that it exists, and practically all of them +consider it inevitable, and a great many derive income from it. So I +say: if you believe in marriage-plus-prostitution, that is your right; +but if marriage is what you believe in, then your task is to consider +such questions as these: Is marriage a possible thing? Can it ever +become the sex arrangement of any society? What are the forces which +have so far prevented it from prevailing, and how can these forces be +counteracted? + +It is my belief that monogamous love is the most desirable of human sex +relationships, the most fruitful in happiness and spiritual development. +The laws and institutions of civilized society pretend to defend this +relationship, but the briefest study of the facts will convince anyone +that these laws and institutions are not really meant to protect +monogamous love. What they are is a device of the property-holding male +to secure his property rights to women, and more especially to secure +himself as to the paternity of his heirs. In primitive society, where +land and other sources of wealth were held in common, and sex monogamy +was unknown, there was no way to determine paternity, and no reason for +doing so. But under the system of private property and class privilege, +it is necessary for some one man to support a child, if it is to be +supported; and when a man has fought hard, and robbed hard, and traded +hard, and acquired wealth, he does not want to spend it in maintaining +another man's child. That he should let himself be fooled into doing so +is one of the greatest humiliations his fellowmen can imagine. If you +read Shakespeare's plays, and look up the meaning of old words, so as to +understand old witticisms and allusions, you will discover that this was +the stock jest of Shakespeare's time. + +In order to protect himself from such ridicule, the man maintained in +ancient times his right to kill the faithless woman with cruel tortures. +He maintains today the right to deprive her of her children, and of all +share in his property, even though she may have helped to earn it. But +until quite recent times, the beginning of the revolt of women, there +was never any corresponding penalty for faithlessness in husbands. Under +the English law today, the husband may divorce his wife for infidelity, +but the wife must prove infidelity plus cruelty, and the courts have +held that the cruelty must consist in knocking her down. While I was in +England, the highest court rendered a decision that a man who brought +his mistress to his home and compelled his wife to wait upon her was not +committing "cruelty" in the meaning of the English law. + +This is what is known as the "double standard," and the double standard +prevails everywhere under the system of marriage-plus-prostitution, and +proves that capitalist "monogamy" is not a spiritual ideal, but a matter +of class privilege. It is a breach of honor for the ruling class male to +tamper with the wife of his friend; it is frequently dangerous for him +to tamper with the young females of his own class; but it is in general +practice taken for granted that the young females of lower classes are +his legitimate prey. In England a man may have a marriage annulled, if +he can prove that the woman he married had what is called a "past"; but +everybody takes it for granted that the man has had a "past"; it is +covered by the polite phrase, "sowing his wild oats." Wherever among the +ruling class you find men bold enough to discuss the facts of the sex +order they have set up, you find the idea, expressed or implied, that +this "wild oats" is a necessary and inevitable part of this order, and +that without it the order would break down. The English philosopher, +Lecky, making an elaborate study of morals through the ages, speaks of +the prostitute in the following frank language: + +"Herself the supreme type of vice, she is ultimately the most efficient +guardian of virtue. But for her, the unchallenged purity of countless +happy homes would be polluted, and not a few who, in the pride of their +untempted chastity, think of her with an indignant shudder, would have +known the agony of remorse and despair. On that one degraded and ignoble +form are concentrated the passions that might have filled the world with +shame. She remains, while creeds and civilizations rise and fall, the +eternal priestess of humanity, blasted for the sins of the people." + +I invite you to study these sentences and understand them fully. +Remember that they are the opinion of the most learned historian of sex +customs who has ever written in English; a man whose authority is +recognized in our schools, whose books are in every college library. +William Edward Hartpole Lecky is not in any sense a revolutionist; he is +a conventional English scholar, an upholder of English law and order and +patriotism. He is not of my school of thought, but of those who now own +the world and run it. I quote him, because he tells in plain language +what kind of world they have made; I invite you to study his words, and +then judge my statement that the sex arrangement under which we live in +modern society is not monogamous love, but marriage-plus-prostitution. + +It is my hope to point the way to a higher system. I should like to call +it marriage; but perhaps it would be more precise to call it +marriage-minus-prostitution. In working it out, we shall have to think +for ourselves, and discard all formulas. It is obvious that our +present-day religious creeds, ethical ideals, legal codes, and social +rewards and punishments have been powerless to protect marriage, or to +make it the rule in sex relationships. So we shall have to begin at the +beginning and find new reasons for monogamous love, a new basis of +marriage other than the protection of private property. We shall have to +inform ourselves as to the fundamental purposes of sex; we shall have to +ask ourselves: What are the factors which determine rightness and +wrongness in the sex relationship? What is love, and what ought it to +be? These questions we shall try to approach without any fixed ideas +whatever. We shall decide them by the same tests that we have used in +our thinking about God and immortality, health and disease. We shall +ask, not what our ancestors believed, not what God teaches us, not what +the law ordains, not what is "respectable," nor yet what is "advanced," +according to the claim of modern sex revolutionists and "free lovers." +We shall ask ourselves, what are the facts. We shall ask, what can be +made to work in practice, what can justify itself by the tests of reason +and common sense. + + + + +CHAPTER XXIX + +THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARRIAGE + + (Deals with the sex-relationship, its meaning and its history, the + stages of its development in human society.) + + +What, in the most elemental form, is sex? It is a difference of function +which makes it necessary for two organisms to take part in the +reproduction of the species. The purpose, or at any rate the effect, of +this sex difference is the mixing of characteristics and qualities. If +the sex relationship were unnecessary to reproduction, variations might +begin, and be propagated and carried to extremes in one line of +inheritance, without ever affecting the rest of the species. Very soon +there would be no species, or rather an infinity of them; each line of +descent would fly apart, and become a group all by itself. You have +perhaps heard people comment on the fact that blondes so frequently +prefer brunettes, and that tall men are apt to marry short women, and +vice versa. This is perhaps nature's way of keeping the type uniform, of +spreading qualities widely and testing them thoroughly. Nature is +continually trying out the powers of every individual in every species, +and by the process of sexual selection she chooses, for the reproduction +of the species, the individuals which are best fitted for survival. +This, of course, refers to nature, considered apart from man. In human +society, as I shall presently show, sexual selection has been distorted, +and partly suppressed. + +Sex differentiation and sexual selection exist almost universally +throughout the animal and vegetable kingdoms, everywhere save in the +lowest forms of being. They take strange and startling forms, and like +everything else in nature manifest amazing ingenuity. People who wish to +prove this or that about human sex relations will advance arguments from +nature; but as a matter of fact we can learn nothing whatever from +nature, except her determination to preserve the products of her +activity and to keep them up to standard. Sometimes nature will give the +precedence in power, speed and beauty to the male, and sometimes to the +female. She is perfectly ruthless, and willing in the accomplishment of +her purpose to destroy the individuals of either sex. She will content +the most rabid feminist by causing the female spider to devour her mate +when his purpose has been accomplished; or by causing the male bee to +fall from his mating in the air, a disemboweled shell. + +As for man, he has won his supremacy over nature by his greater power to +combine in groups; by his more intense gregarious, or herd instincts, +which enabled him to fight and destroy creatures which would have +exterminated him if he had fought them alone. So in primitive society +everywhere, we find that the individual is subordinated to the group, +and the "folkways" give but little heed to personal rights. Very +thorough investigations have been made into the life of primitive man in +many parts of the world, and the anthropologists are now arguing over +the exact meaning of the data. We shall not here attempt to decide among +them, but rest content with the statement that communism and tribal +ownership is a widespread social form among primitive man, so much so as +to suggest that it is an early stage in social evolution. + +And this communism includes, not merely property, but sex. In the very +earliest days there was often no barrier whatever to the sex +relationship; not even between brothers and sisters, nor between parents +and children. In fact, we find savages who do not know that the sex +relationship has anything to do with procreation. But as knowledge +increases, sex "tabus" develop, some wise, and some foolish. From causes +not entirely clear, but which we discuss in Chapter XLVIII, there +gradually evolves a widespread form of sex relationship of primitive +man, the system of the "gens," as it is called. This is the Latin word +for family, but it does not mean family in the narrow sense of mother +and father and children, but in the broad sense of all those who have +blood relationship, however far removed--uncles and aunts and cousins, +as far as memory can trace. In primitive communism a man is not +permitted to enter into the sex relationship with a woman of the same +gens, but with all the women of some other gens. It is difficult for us +to imagine a society in which all the men named Jones would be married +to all the women named Smith; but that was the way whole races of +mankind lived for many thousands of years. + +In that primitive communist society, the woman was generally the equal +of the man. It is true that she did the drudgery of the camp, but the +man, on the other hand, faced the hardships of battle and the chase on +land and sea. The woman was as big as the man, and except when +handicapped by pregnancy, as strong as the man; she was as much +respected, if not more so. Her children bore her name, and were under +her control, and she was accustomed to assert herself in all affairs of +the tribe. In Frederick O'Brien's "White Shadows in the South Seas," you +may read a comical story of a journey this traveler made into the +interior of one of the cannibal islands. Everywhere he was treated with +courtesy and hospitality, but was embarrassed by continual offers from +would-be wives. In one case a powerful cannibal lady, whose advances he +rejected, picked him up and proceeded to carry him off, and he was quite +helpless in her grasp; he might have been a cannibal husband today, if +it had not been for the intervention of his fellow travelers. + +The basis of this sex equality under primitive communism is easy to +understand. All goods belonged to the tribe, and were shared alike +according to need. Children were the tribe's most precious possession; +therefore the woman suffered little handicap from having a child to bear +and feed. Primitive woman would bear her child by the roadside, and pick +it up in her arms, and continue her journey; and when she needed food, +she did not have to beg for it--if there was food for anyone, there was +food for her and her child. She did her share of the gathering and +preparing of food, because that was the habit and law of her being; she +had energies, and had never heard of the idea of not using them. + +This primitive communism generally disappears as the tribe progresses. +We cannot be sure of all the stages of its disappearance, or of the +causes, but in a general way we can say that it gives way before the +spread of slavery. In the beginning primitive man does not have any +slaves, he does not have sufficient foresight or self-restraint for +that. When he kills his enemies in battle, he builds a fire and roasts +their flesh and eats them; and those whom he captures alive, he binds +fast and takes with him, to be sacrificed to his voodoo gods. But as he +comes to more settled ways of living, and as the tribe grows larger, it +occurs to the chiefs in battle that the captives would be glad to give +their labor in return for their lives, and that it would be convenient +to have some people to do the hard and dirty work. So gradually there +comes to be a class at the bottom of society, and another class at the +top. Those who capture the slaves and keep them at work lay claim to the +products of their labor--at first better weapons and personal +adornments, then separate homes for the chiefs and priests, separate +gardens, separate flocks and herds, and--what more natural?--separate +women. + +This process becomes complete when the tribe settles down to +agriculture, and the ruling classes take possession of the land. When +once the land is privately owned, classes are fixed, and class +distinctions become the most prominent fact in society. And step by step +as this happens, we see women beaten down, from the position of the +cannibal lady, who could ask for the man she wanted and carry him off by +force if necessary, to the position of the modern woman, who is +physically weak, emotionally unstable, economically dependent, and +socially repressed. You may resent such phrases, but all you have to do +is to read the laws of civilized countries, written into the statute +books by men to define the rights and duties of women; you will see that +everywhere, before the recent feminist revolt, women were classified +under the law with children and imbeciles. + +Maternity imposes on woman a heavy burden, and before the discovery of +birth control, a burden that is continuous. For nine months she carries +the child in her body, and then for a year or two she carries it in her +arms, or on her back; and by that time there is another child, and this +continues until she is broken down. Having this burden, she cannot +possibly compete with the unburdened male for the possession of +property. So wherever there is economic competition; wherever certain +individuals or classes in the tribe or group are allowed to seize and +hold the land; wherever the products of labor cease to be the community +property, and become private property, the objects of economic strife; +then inevitably and by natural process, woman comes to be placed among +those who cannot protect themselves--that is, among the children and the +imbeciles and the slaves. Of course, some children are well cared for, +and so are some imbeciles, and some slaves, and some women. But they are +cared for as a matter of favor, not as a matter of their own power. They +proceed no longer as the cannibal lady, but by adopting and cultivating +the slave virtues, by making themselves agreeable to their masters, by +flattering their masters' vanity and sensuality--in other words by +exercising what we are accustomed to call "feminine charm." + +From early barbaric society up to the present day, we observe that there +are classes of women, just as there are classes of men. The position of +these classes changes within certain limits, but in broad outline the +conditions are fixed, and may be easily defined. There is, first of all, +the ruling class woman. She must have birth; she may or may not have +wealth, according as to whether the laws of that society or tribe permit +her to have possessions of her own, or to inherit anything from her +parents. If she has no wealth, then she will need beauty. She is the +woman who is selected by the ruling class man to bear his name and his +children, and to have charge of the household where these children are +reared, and trained for the inheriting of their father's wealth and the +carrying on of his position. This confers upon the ruling class woman +great dignity, and makes her a person of responsibility. She rules, not +merely over the slaves of the household, but over men of inferior social +classes, and in a few cases an exceptionally able woman has become a +queen, and ruled over men of her own class. This ruling class woman has +been known through all the ages by a special name, and the ways and +customs regarding her have been studied in an entertaining book, "The +Lady," by Emily James Putnam. + +Next in privilege and position to the "lady" is the mistress, the woman +who is selected by the ruling class man, not primarily to bear his +children, but to entertain and divert him. She may, of course, bear +children also. In barbaric societies, and up to quite recent times, the +importance of the ruling class man was indicated by the number of +concubines he had, and the position of these women was hardly inferior +to that of the wife or queen. In the days of the French monarchy, the +king's mistress was frequently more important than the queen; she was a +woman of ability, maintaining her supremacy in the intrigues of the +court. In ancient Greek society, the "hetairae" were a recognized class, +and Aspasia, the mistress of Pericles, was the most brilliant and most +conspicuous woman in Athens. In modern France, the position of the +mistress is recognized by the phrase "demi-monde," or half-world. The +American plutocracy has developed upon a superstructure of Puritanism, +and therefore, in America, hypocrisy is necessary. But in the great +cities of America, the vast majority of the ruling class men keep +mistresses before marriage, and a great many keep them afterwards; and +these mistresses are coming to be more and more openly flaunted, and to +acquire more and more of what is called "social position." It is +possible now in the "smart set" for a lady to accept the status of +mistress, delicately veiled, without losing caste thereby, and actresses +and other free lance women who got their start in life by taking the +position of mistress, are coming more and more to be recognized as +"ladies," and to be received into what are called the "best circles." + +There remains to be considered the position of the lower class women. In +barbarous society these women were very little different from slaves. +They had no rights of their own, except such rights as their master man +chose to allow them for his own convenience. They were sold in marriage +by their parents, and they went where they were sold, and obeyed their +new master. They became his household drudges, and reserved their +affections for him; if they failed to do this, he stoned them to death, +or strangled them with a cord and tied them in a sack and threw them +into the river. + +And, of course, the rights of the master man yielded to the rights of +men of higher classes. The king or nobleman could take any woman he +wished at any time, and he made laws to this effect and enforced them. +In feudal society the lord of the manor claimed the right of the first +night with the wives of his serfs; this was one of the ruling class +privileges which was abolished in the French revolution. Wherever the +French revolution did not succeed in affecting land tenure, the right of +the land owner to prey upon his tenant girls continues as a custom, even +though it is not written in the law, and would be denied by the +hypocritical. It prevails in Poland, as you may discover by reading +Sienkiewicz's "Whirlpools"; it prevails in England, as you may discover +from Hardy's "Tess of the d'Urbervilles." You will find that it prevails +in every part of the world where women have poverty and men have wealth +and prestige, dress suits and automobiles. You will find it wherever +there are leisure class hotels, or colleges, or other gatherings of +ruling class young males. You will find it in the theatrical and moving +picture worlds. It is well understood in the theatrical world of +Broadway that the woman "star" in the profession gets her start in life +by becoming the mistress of a manager or "angel." In the moving picture +world of Southern California it is a recognized convention, known to +everyone familiar with the business, that a young girl parts with her +virtue in exchange for an important job. + + + + +CHAPTER XXX + +SEX AND YOUNG AMERICA + + (Discusses present-day sex arrangements, as they affect the future + generation.) + + +Our first task is to consider how people actually behave in the matter +of sex--as distinguished from the way they pretend to behave. The first +and most necessary step in the cure of any disease is a correct +diagnosis, and in this case we have not merely to make the diagnosis, +but to prove it; because the most conspicuous fact about our present +sex-arrangements is a mass of organized concealment. Not merely do +teachers and preachers for the most part suppress all mention of these +subjects; but the defenders of our present economic disorder are +accustomed to acclaim the private property regime as the only basis of +family life. So long as people hold such an idea, there is no use trying +to teach them anything on the subject. There is no use talking to them +about monogamous love, because all they understand is hypocrisy. In this +chapter, therefore, we shall proceed to hold up the mirror in front of +capitalist morality. + +I pause and consider: Where shall I begin? At the top of society, or at +the bottom? With the city or the country? With the old or the young? I +think you care most of all about your boys and girls, so I am going to +tell you what is happening to the youth of America in these days of +triumphant reaction. + +I have a son, about whom naturally I think a great deal; just now he is +a student at one of our state universities, and he wrote me the other +day: "I went to a dance, and believe me, father, if you knew what these +modern dances mean, you would write something about them." I know what +they mean. They have come to us straight from the brothels of the +Argentine, among the vilest haunts of vice in the world. Others have +come from the jungle, where they were natural. The poor creature of the +jungle has his sex-desire and nothing else; he is not troubled with +brains, he does not have a complicated social organism to build up and +protect, consequently he does not need what are called "morals." But we +civilized people need morals, and we are losing them, and our society is +disintegrating, going back to the howling and fighting and cannibalism +of the jungle. + +Prof. William James, America's greatest psychologist, tells us that +going through the motions appropriate to an emotion automatically causes +that emotion to be felt. If you watch an actor preparing to rush on the +stage in an emotional scene, you will see him walking about, clenching +his fists, stamping his feet, making ferocious faces, "working himself +up." And now, what do you think is going on in the minds of young men +and women, while with their bodies they are going through procedures +which are nothing and can be nothing but imitations of sexual contact? + +The parents, it appears, are ignorant and unsophisticated, and have left +it for the children to find out what these dances mean. In Rhode Island, +one of our oldest states, is Brown College, chosen by New England's +aristocracy for the education of its sons; and these boys go to social +affairs in the best homes in Providence, and they call them +"petting-parties." And here is what they write in their college paper: + +"The modern social bud drinks, not too much, often, but enough. She +smokes unguardedly, swears considerably, and tells 'dirty' stories. All +in all, she is a most frivolous, passionate, sensation-seeking little +thing." + +This statement, published in a college paper, causes a scandal, and a +newspaper reporter goes to interview the college boy who edits the +paper, and this boy talks. He tells how he met a lovely girl at a dance, +and his heart was thrilled with the rapture of young love. "Frankly, +between you and me, I was pretty smitten with this particular little +lady. Felt about her, don't you know, like a real guy feels about the +girl he could imagine himself married to. Thought she was too nice to +touch, almost; you know the grave sort of love affair a man always has +once in a lifetime. Well, we walked a bit, and I guess I didn't say +much, for a while. I felt plenty--respectfully--just the same. And as we +turned the corner of one of the buildings here, she grasped my hand. +Hers was trembling. 'Love and let love is my motto, dearie,' said this +seraph of my dreams; 'come, we're losing a lot of time getting started.' +That girl thought I was dead slow. She didn't know that just then I +imagined the great love of my life was just entering the door. It was +cruel the way she got down from the pedestal I had built for her." + +Suppose I should ask you to name the influence that is having most to do +with shaping the thoughts of young America--what would you answer? +Undoubtedly, the moving pictures. It is from the "movies" that your +children learn what life is; if I can show you that a certain thing is +in the "movies," you can surely not deny that it is passing every day +and night into the hearts and minds of millions of our boys and girls. +Take a vote among the girls, what would they consider the most +delightful destiny in life; surely nine out of ten would answer, to +become a screen star, and pose before a world of admirers, and be paid a +million dollars a year. Make a test and see; and put that fact together +with the one I have already stated, that in order to get an important +job in the "movies," a girl must regularly and as a matter of course +part with her virtue. + +You will be told, no doubt, that this is a slanderous statement, so let +me give you a little evidence. I happened within the past year to be in +the private office of a well known moving picture producer, a man who is +married, and takes care to tell you that he loves his wife. He was +producing a play, the heroine of which was supposed to be a daughter of +Puritan New England. To play this part he had engaged a chaste girl, and +as a result was in the midst of a queer trouble, which he poured out to +me. His "leading man" had refused to act with this girl, insisting that +no girl could act a part of love unless she had had passionate +experience; no such thing had ever been heard of in moving pictures +before. Likewise, the director agreed that no girl who is chaste could +act for the screen, and the producer asked my advice about it. Mr. +William Allen White, of Kansas, was present in the office, and +authorizes me to state that he substantiates this anecdote. We both +advised the producer to stand by the girl, and he did so; and the +picture went out, and proved to be what in trade parlance is termed a +"frost"; that is to say, your children didn't care for it, and it cost +the producer something like a hundred thousand dollars to make this +attempt to defy the conventions of the moving picture world. + +I will tell you another story. I have a friend, a prominent man in Los +Angeles, who was appealed to by a young lady who wished to act in the +"movies." My friend introduced this young lady to a very prominent +screen actor, who in turn introduced her to one of the biggest producers +in America, one of the men whose "million dollar feature pictures" are +regularly exploited. The producer examined the young lady's figure, and +told her that she would "do"; he added, quite casually, and as a matter +of course, that she would be expected to "pay the price." The young lady +took exception to this proposition, and gave up the chance. She told my +friend about it, and he, being a man of the world, accustomed to dealing +with the foibles of his fellowmen, wrote a note to the actor, explaining +that inasmuch as this young lady had been socially introduced to him, +and by him socially introduced to the manager, she should not have been +expected to "pay the price." To this the actor answered that my friend +was correct, and he would see the manager about it. The manager conceded +the point, and the young lady got her chance in the "movies" and made +good without "paying the price." This story tells you all you need to +know about the difference in sex ethics that society applies to the +"lady" and to the daughter of the common people. + +You know, of course, what is the stock theme of all moving pictures--the +virtuous daughter of the people, who resists all temptations, and is +finally rescued from her would-be seducer by the strong and sturdy arm +of a male doll. Could one ask a more perfect illustration of capitalist +hypocrisy than the fact that the girl who plays this role is required to +pay with her virtue for the privilege of playing it! And if you know +anything about young girls, you can watch her playing it on the screen, +and see from her every gesture that what I am telling you is true. My +wife knows young girls, and I took her, the other day, to see a moving +picture. She said: "I have solved a problem. When I come home on the +street-cars, it happens that I ride with a lot of young girls from the +high school. I have been watching them, and I couldn't imagine what was +the matter with them. All simple, girlish straightforwardness is gone +out of them; they are making eyes, in the strangest manner--and at +nobody; just practicing, apparently. They wear yearning facial +expressions; when they start to walk, they do not walk, but writhe and +wiggle. I thought there must be some nervous eye and lip disease got +abroad in the school. But now, when I go to a moving picture, I discover +what it means. They are imitating the 'stars' on the screen!" + +In these pictures, you know, there are "ingenues," young girls engaged +in making a happy ending to the story by capturing a rich lover; and +then there are "vamps," engaged in seducing young men, or breaking up +some happy home. In old-style melodrama it was possible to tell the +"ingenue" from the "vamps"; the former would trip lightly, and glance +coyly out of the corners of her eyes, while the "vamp" moved with slow, +languished writhing, blinking heavy-lidded, sinister eyes. But +now-a-days the "vamps" have learned to pose as "ingenues," and the +"ingenues" are as vicious as the "vamps"; they both make the same +glances, and culminate in the same sensual swoon. It is all sex, and +nothing else--except revolvers and fighting, and wild rushing about. + +And then, too, there are the musical comedies, made wholly out of sex, +being known as "girl shows," or more frankly still, "leg shows." A row +of half naked women, prancing and gyrating on the stage, and in front of +them rows of bald-headed old men, gazing at them greedily; also college +boys, or boys too imbecile to get through college, sending in their +cards with boxes of costly flowers. You will be shocked as you read my +plain statements of fact, but if you are the average American, you will +take your family to a musical show which has come straight from the +brothels of Paris, every allusion of which is obscene. I remember once +being in a small town in the South, when one of these "road shows" +arrived from New York, and I realized that this institution was simply a +traveling house of ill fame; the whole male portion of the town was +a-quiver with excitement, a mixture of lust and fear. + +I live in Southern California, one of many places in America where the +idle rich gather for their diversion. The country is dotted with +palatial hotels, and a golden flood of pleasure-seekers come in every +winter. I have talked with some of the college boys in this part of the +country, and also with teachers who try to save the boys; they report +these "swell" hotels as hot-beds of vice, haunted by married women with +automobiles, and nothing to do, who wish to go into the canyons for +sexual riots. Even elderly women, white-haired women, old enough to be +your grandmother! I have had them pointed out to me in these hotels, +their cheeks and lips covered with rouge, with pink silk tights on their +calves, and nothing else almost up to their knees and nothing at all +half way down their backs. These old women seek to prey on boys, wanting +their youth, and being willing to lavish money upon them. They are +preying on your boys--you prosperous business men, who have preached the +gospel of "each for himself," and are proud of your skill to prey upon +society. You heap up your fortunes, and call it success, and are secure +and happy. You have made your children safe against want, you think; but +how are you going to make them safe against the "vamps" who prey upon +the overwhelming excitements of youth, and betray your sons before your +very eyes--teaching them lust in their youth, so that love may never be +born in their stunted hearts? All the haunts of "gilded vice" are +thriving, and somebody's boy is paying the interest on the capital, to +say nothing of paying the police. + +Many years ago I paid a call upon Anthony Comstock, head of the Society +for the Prevention of Vice. Comstock was an old-style Puritan, and many +insist that he was likewise an old-style grafter. However that may be, +he had a collection of the literature of pornography which would cause +any man to hesitate in condemning his activities. There is a vast +traffic in this kind of thing; it is sold by pack-peddlers all over the +country, and it is sold in little shops in the neighborhood of public +schools. You may be sure that in your school there are some boys who +know where to get it, even though they will not tell what they know. I +will describe just one piece that a school boy brought to me, a +catalogue of obscene literature, for sale in Spain, and to be ordered +wholesale. You know how men with wares to sell will expend their +imaginations and exhaust their vocabulary in describing to you the +charms of each particular article for sale. Here was a catalogue of one +or two hundred pages, listing thousands of items, pictures, pamphlets +and books, and various implements of vice, all set forth in that +imitation ecstasy of department stores and seed catalogues: here was +"something neat," here was a "fancy one," this one was "a peach," and +that one was "a winner." + +When I was a lad, I was tramping in the Adirondack mountains and was +picked up by an itinerant photographer. We rode all day together, and he +became friendly, and showed me some obscene pictures. Presently he +discovered that he was dealing with a young moralist, and apparently it +was the first time he had ever had that experience; he talked honestly, +and we became friends on a different basis. This man had a wife and +children at home, but he traveled all over the mountains, and was like +the sailor with a girl in every port. Also he was thoroughly familiar +with all forms of unnatural vice, and took this also as a matter of +course, and spread it on his journeys. + +The other day I read a statement by a prominent physician in New York; +he had been talking with a police captain, and had asked him to state +what in his opinion was the most significant development in the social +life of New York. The answer was, "The spread of male prostitution." +Here is a subject to which I have to admit my courage is unequal. I +cannot repeat the jokes which I have heard young men tell about these +matters, and about the attitude of the police to them. Suffice it to say +that these hideous forms of vice are now the commonplace of the +under-world of all our great cities. The other day a friend of mine was +talking with a prostitute who had left a high-class resort, where the +price charged was ten dollars, and gone to live in a "fifty-cent house," +frequented by sailors. She was asked the reason, and her explanation +was, "The sailors are natural." Dr. William J. Robinson has written in +his magazine an account of the haunts in Berlin which are frequented by +the victims of unnatural vice, there allowed to meet openly and to +solicit. Frank Harris, in his "Life of Oscar Wilde," tells how when that +scandal was at its height, and further exposure threatened, swarms of +the most prominent men in England suddenly discovered that it was +advisable for them to travel on the Continent. The great public schools +of England are rotten with these practices; the younger boys learn them +from the older ones, and are victims all the rest of their lives. And +the corruption is creeping through our own social body--and you think +that all you have to do is not to know about it! + +My friend Floyd Dell, reading this manuscript, insists that this chapter +and the one following are too severe. In case others should agree with +him, I quote two newspaper items which appear while I am reading the +proofs. The first is from an interview with H. Gordon Selfridge, the +London merchant, telling his impressions of America. He tells about the +"flappers," and then about the "shifters." + +"The other is the newly exploited 'shifters.' The 'shifters' are an +organization of mushroom growth among high school girls and boys which +is spreading through the eastern States and winning converts among +youngsters. It is described as the 'flapper Ku Klux,' and its emblem, if +worn by a girl, according to high school teachers and children's society +leaders who oppose it, to be nothing more nor less than an invitation to +be kissed. + +"To call it an organization even is exaggeration, for the 'shifters' are +better described as a secret understanding without any responsible head. + +"From being a seemingly harmless group whose emblem was originally a +brass paper clip fastened in the coat lapel it has developed by rapid +strides. Manufacturers of emblems are coining money by the sale of +hands, palm outstretched. The significance is take what you want or, as +the motto of the order says, 'be a good fellow; get something for +nothing.' One of the principles is to 'do' one's parents, referred to as +'they.'" + +The second item is an Associated Press despatch: + +"ST. LOUIS, March 10.--In reiterating his statement that a girls' and a +boys' secret organization requiring that all applicants must have +violated the moral code before admission was granted, existed in a local +high school, Victor J. Miller, president of the Board of Police +Commissioners, tonight named the Soldan High School as the one in which +the alleged immoral conditions exist. The school is attended largely by +children of the wealthy West End citizens. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXI + +SEX AND THE "SMART SET" + + (Portrays the moral customs of those who set the fashion in our + present-day world.) + + +We have discussed what is happening to our young people; let us next +consider what our mature people are doing. Having mentioned conditions +in England, I will give a glimpse of London "high life" two years before +the war. + +As a visiting writer, I was invited to luncheon at the home of a woman +novelist, whose books at that time were widely read both in her country +and here. Present at the luncheon was a prominent publisher, who I +afterwards learned was the lady's lover; also the lady's grown and +married son. The publisher looked like a buxom hunting squire, but the +lady told me that he was very unhappy, because his wife would not +divorce him. The lady had just come from a week-end party at the home of +an earl, who at this moment occupies one of the highest posts in the +gift of the British Empire. Things had gone comically wrong at this +country house party, she said, because the hostess had failed to +remember that Lord So-and-so was at present living with Lady +Somebody-else. One of the duties of hostesses at house parties, it +appears, is to know who is living with whom, in order that they may be +put in connecting rooms. In this case his Lordship had been grouchy, and +everybody's pleasure had been spoiled. + +This produced a discussion of the subject of marriage, and the son +remarked that marriage was like an old slipper; you wore it, because you +had got used to it, but you did not talk about it, because it was +unimportant and stupid. I went away, and happened to mention these +matters to a friend, who had met this woman novelist in Nice. The +novelist had there, in a group of people, been introduced to a young +girl who was suffering from neurasthenia. "My dear," said the novelist, +affectionately, "what you need is to have an illegitimate baby." + +This, you will say, is the "old world," and you always knew that it was +corrupt. If so, let me tell you a few things that I have seen among the +"upper circles" of our own great and virtuous democracy. My first +acquaintance with New York "society" came after the publication of "The +Jungle." As the author of that book I was a sensation, almost as much so +as if I had won the heavy-weight championship of the world. Out of +curiosity I accepted an invitation for a weekend amid what is called the +"hunting set" of Long Island. Here was a gorgeous palace with many +tapestries, and soft-footed servants, and decanters and cocktails at +every stage of one's journey about the place, like coaling stations on +the trade routes of the British Empire. One of the first sights that +caught my young eye was a large and stately lady in semi-undress, +smoking a big black cigar. If I were to mention her name, every +newspaper reader in America would know her; and before I had been +introduced to her, I heard two young men in evening dress make an +obscene remark about her, and what she was waiting for that evening. + +I discovered quickly that, while there was a great deal of sex among +these people, there was very little love. There was principally a wish +to score cleverly and subtly at the expense of another person's +feelings. It is called the "smart set," you understand, and I will give +you an idea of how "smart" it is. I was walking down a passage with a +lady, and on a couch sat another lady, side by side with a certain very +famous lawyer, whose golden eloquence you have probably listened to from +platforms, and whom for the purpose of this anecdote I will name Jones. +Mr. Jones and the lady on the sofa were sitting very close together, and +my companion, with a bright smile over her shoulder, called out: "Be +careful, Mary; you'll be scattering a lot of little Joneses around here +if you don't watch out!" Quite "continental," you perceive; and a long +way from the Puritanism of our ancestors! + +From there I went to the billiard-room, and observed a young man of +fashion trying to play billiards when he was half drunk. It was a funny +spectacle, and they took away his cigarette by force, for fear he would +drop it on the cloth of the billiard table. Pretty soon he was telling +about a racing meet, and an orgy with negro women in a stable. Therefore +I returned to where the ladies were gathered, and one middle-aged +matron, who had read widely, including some of my books, engaged me in +serious conversation. I came later on to know her rather well, and she +told me her views of love; the source of all the sex troubles of +humanity was that they took the relationship seriously. Modern +discoveries made it unnecessary to attach importance to it. She herself, +acting upon this theory, probably had had relations with--my friends, +reading the proofs of this book, beg me to omit the number of men, +because you would not believe me! + +You may argue that this is not typical; say that I fell into the +clutches of some particular group of degenerates. All I can tell you is +that these people are as "socially prominent" as any in New York City. I +will say furthermore that I have sat in the home of the best known +corporation lawyer in America, who was paid a million dollars to +organize the steel trust--the late James B. Dill, at that time a member +of the Court of Appeals of New Jersey--and have heard him "muck-rake" +his business friends by the hour with stories of that sort. I have heard +him tell of the "steel crowd" hiring a trolley car and a load of +prostitutes and champagne, and taking an all-night trip from one city to +another, smashing up both the car and the prostitutes. I have heard him +tell of sitting on the deck of a Sound steamer, and overhearing two of +his Wall Street associates and their wives arranging to trade partners +for the night. + +I have mentioned a lady who had a great many lovers. Once in the +dining-room of a club on Fifth Avenue, commonly known as "the +Millionaires'," a companion pointed out various people, many of whom I +had read about in the newspapers, and told me funny stories about them. +"See that old boy with a note-book," said my host. "That is Jacob +So-and-so, and he is entering up the cost of his lunch. He keeps +accounts of everything, even of his women. He told me he had had over a +thousand, and they had cost him over a million." + +It is impossible to say what is the most terrible thing in capitalist +society, but among the most terrible are assuredly the old men. The +richest and most powerful banker in America was in his sex habits the +merry jest of New York society. He took toward women the same attitude +as King Edward VII; if he wanted one, he went up and asked for her, and +it made no difference who she was, or where she was. This man's personal +living expenses were five thousand dollars a day, and all women +understood that they might have anything within reason. + +When I was a boy, living in New York, there was a certain aged +money-lender about whom one read something in the newspapers almost +every day. He was a prominent figure, because he was worth eighty +millions, yet wore an old, rusty black suit, and saved every penny. +Every now and then you would read in the paper how some woman had been +arrested for attempting to blackmail him in his office. It seemed +puzzling, because you wouldn't think of him as a likely subject for +blackmail. Some years later I met Dorothy Richardson, author of "The +Long Day," a very fine book which has been undeservedly forgotten. Miss +Richardson had been a reporter for the New York _Herald_, and had been +sent to interview this old money-lender. She was ushered into his +private office, and as soon as the attendant had gone out and closed the +door, the old man came up, and without a word of preliminaries grabbed +her in his arms like a gorilla. She fought and scratched, and got out, +and was wise enough to say nothing about it; therefore there was nothing +published about another attempt to blackmail the aged money-lender! + +What this means is that men of unlimited means live lives of unbridled +lust, and then in their old age they are helpless victims of their own +impulses. There was a certain enormously wealthy United States Senator +from West Virginia, who came very near being Vice President of the +United States. This doddering old man would go about the streets of +Washington with a couple of very decorous and carefully trained +attendants; and whenever an attractive young woman would pass on the +street, or when one would approach the Senator, these two attendants +would quietly slip their arms into his and hold him fast. They would do +this so that the ordinary person would not suspect what was going on, +but would think the old man was being supported. + +You do not have to take these things on my word; the newspapers are full +of them all the time, and they are proven in court. Just now as I write, +the president of the most powerful bank in America is claiming in court +that his children are not his own, but that their father is an Indian +guide. His wife, on the other hand, is accusing the banker of having +played the role of husband to several other women. He would take these +women traveling on his yacht, which, quaintly enough, was termed the +"Modesty." + +Also the papers have been full of the "Hamon case." Here is a wealthy +man, Republican National Committeeman from Oklahoma, who is about to go +to Washington to advise our new President whom to appoint to office from +that state. Before he goes, he casts off his mistress, and she shoots +him. She was his secretary, it appears, and helped him to make his +fortune; she has made many friends, and a million dollars is spent to +save her life. The prosecuting attorney calls her a "painted snake," and +accuses her of having sat week after week "displaying to the jury +twenty-four inches of silk stockinged shin-bone." The jury, apparently +unable to withstand this allurement, acquits the woman, and she +announces that she intends to bring suit under the man's will to get his +money! Also, she is going into the "movies," and tells us that it is to +be "for educational purposes." Everything in our capitalist society must +be "educational," you understand. It was P. T. Barnum who discovered +that the American people would flock to look at a five-legged calf, if +it was presented as "educational." + +The moving pictures and the theatres are the honey-pots which gather the +feminine beauty and youthful charm of our country for the convenience of +rich men's lust. These girls swarm in the theatrical agencies, and in +the artists' studios; they starve for a while, and finally they yield. +In every great city there are thousands of men of wealth, whose only +occupation is to prey upon such girls. I know a certain theatrical +manager, the most famous in the United States, a sensual, stout little +Jew. He is a man of culture and subtle insight, and in the course of his +conversation he described to me, quite casually and as a matter of +course, the charm of deflowering a virgin. Nothing could equal that +sensation; the first time was the last. + +Many years ago there was a horrible scandal in New York. The most famous +architect in America was murdered, and the newspapers probed into his +life, and it was revealed to us that many of the most famous artists and +men about town in New York maintained elaborate studios, equipped with +every luxury, all the paraphernalia of all the vices of the ages; and +through these places there flowed an endless stream of beautiful young +girls. In every large city in America you will find an "athletic club," +and if you go there and listen to the gossip, you discover that there +are scores of idle rich men with automobiles and private apartments, and +a staff of procurers used in preying, not merely upon young girls, but +also upon young boys. And these are not merely the children of the poor, +they are the children of all but the rich and powerful. In the "movies" +you see pictures of girls lured into automobiles, and carried out into +the country, or seduced by means of "knock-out drops," and you think +this is just "melodrama"; but it is happening all the time. In every big +city of our country the police know that hundreds of young girls +disappear every year. At a recent convention of police chiefs in +Washington, it was stated, from police records, that sixty thousand +girls disappear every year in the United States, leaving no trace. +Unless the parents happen to be in position to make a fuss, not even the +names of the girls are published in the newspapers. I do not ask you to +believe such things on my word; believe District Attorney Sims of +Chicago, who made the most thorough study of this subject ever made in +America, and wrote: + +"When a white slave is sold and landed in a house or dive she becomes a +prisoner.... In each of these places is a room having but one door, to +which the keeper holds the key. Here are locked all the street clothes, +shoes and ordinary apparel.... The finery provided for the girls is of a +nature to make their appearance on the street impossible. Then in +addition to this handicap, the girl is placed at once in debt to the +keeper for a wardrobe.... She cannot escape while she is in debt, and +she can never get out of debt. Not many of the women in this class +expect to live more than ten years--perhaps the average is less. Many +die painful deaths by disease, many by consumption, but it is hardly +beyond the truth to say that suicide is their general expectation." + + + + +CHAPTER XXXII + +SEX AND THE POOR + + (Discusses prostitution, the extent of its prevalence, and the + diseases which result from it.) + + +It is manifest that the rich cannot indulge in vices, without drawing +the poor after them; and in addition to this, the poor have their own +evil instincts, which fester in neglect. There were several hundred +thousand dark rooms, that is rooms without light or ventilation, in New +York City before the war. Now the country is reported to be short a +million homes, and in New York City working girls are sleeping six or +eight in a room. In the homes of the poor in the slums, parents and +children and boarders all sleep in one room indiscriminately, and the +world moves back to that primitive communism, in which incest is an +everyday affair, and little children learn all the vices there are. I +have in my hand a pamphlet by a physician, in charge of a hospital in +New York, who in fifteen years has examined nine hundred children who +have been raped, and the age of the youngest was eight months! I have +another pamphlet by a settlement worker, who discusses the problem of +the thousands of deserted wives, most of them with children, many with +children yet unborn. As I write, there are millions of men out of work +in our country, and these men are desperate, and they quit and take to +the road. They join the army of the casual workers, the "blanket +stiffs"; and, of course, the more there are of these men, the more +prostitutes there have to be, and the more homosexuality there will +inevitably be. + +Also the girls are out of work, and are on the streets. Many years ago I +visited the mill towns of New England, "she-towns" they are called, and +one of the young fellows said to me that you could buy a girl there for +the price of a sandwich. Read "The Long Day," to which I have previously +referred, and see how our working girls live. Dorothy Richardson +describes her room-mate, who read cheap novels which she found in the +gutter weeklies. She read them over and over; when she had got to the +bottom of the pile, she began again, because her mind was so weak that +she had forgotten everything. And then one day Miss Richardson happened +to be groping in a corner of a closet, and came upon a great pile of +bottles, and examined them, and was made sick with horror--abortion +mixtures. + +Dr. William J. Robinson, an authority on the subject, estimates that +there are one million abortions in the United States every year. Some of +these are accidental, caused by venereal disease, but the vast majority +are deliberate acts, crimes under the law, murder of human life. Dr. +Robinson also estimates, from the many thousands of cases which come to +him, that ninety-five per cent of all men have at some time practiced +self-abuse. He is a strenuous opponent of what he calls "hysteria" on +the subject of venereal disease, and insists that its prevalence is +exaggerated; that instead of one person in ten being syphilitic, as is +commonly stated, the proportion is only one in twenty. He insists that +the percentage of persons having had gonorrhea is only twenty-five per +cent, instead of seventy-five or eighty-five. I find that other +authorities generally agree in the statement that fifty per cent of +young men become infected with some venereal disease before they reach +the age of thirty. The Committee of Seven in New York estimated in 1903 +that there were two hundred thousand cases of syphilis in the city, and +eight hundred thousand of gonorrhea. There were villages in France +before the war in which twenty-five per cent of the inhabitants were +syphilitic, and in Russia there were towns in which it was said that +every person was syphilitic. We may safely say that these latter are the +only towns in Europe in which there was not an enormous increase of this +disease during and since the war. + +What are the consequences of these diseases? The consequences are +frightful suffering, not merely to persons guilty of immorality, but to +innocent persons. Dr. Morrow, generally recognized as the leading +authority on this subject, estimates that ten per cent of all wives are +infected with venereal disease by their husbands; he estimates that +thirty per cent of all the infected women in New York were wives who had +got the disease from their husbands. It is estimated that thirty per +cent of all the births, where either parent has syphilis, result in +abortions. It is estimated that fifty per cent of childlessness in +marriage is caused by gonorrhea, and twenty-five per cent of all +existing blindness. In Germany, before the war, there were thirty +thousand persons born blind from this cause. It is estimated that +ninety-five per cent of all abdominal operations performed upon women +are due to gonorrhea. And any of these horrors may fall upon persons who +lead lives of the strictest chastity. There was a case reported in +Germany of 236 children who contracted venereal disease from swimming in +a public bath. + +All these things are products of our system of +marriage-plus-prostitution. They are all part of that system, and no +study of the system is complete without them. Everywhere throughout +modern civilization prostitution is an enormous and lucrative industry. +In New York it is estimated to give employment to two hundred thousand +women, to say nothing of the managers, and the runners, and the men who +live off the women. There are thousands of resorts, large and small, +high-priced and cheap, and the police know all about it, and derive a +handsome income from it. And you find it the same in every great city of +the world; in every port where sailors land, or every place where crowds +of men are expected. If there is to be a football game, or a political +convention, the managers of the industry know about it, and while they +may never have heard the libel that Socialism preaches sexual license, +they all know that capitalism practices it, and they provide the +necessary means. In the United States there are estimated to be a half a +million prostitutes, counting the inmates of houses alone. + +During the late war, at the army bases in France, the British government +maintained official brothels; but if you published anything about this +in England, you ran a chance of having your paper suppressed. During the +occupation of the Rhine country, the French sent in negro troops, +savages from the heart of Africa, whose custom it is to cut off the ears +of their enemies in battle; and the French army compelled the German +population to supply white women for these troops. I have quoted in "The +Brass Check" a pious editorial from the Los Angeles _Times_, bidding the +mothers of America be happy, because "our boys in France" were safe in +the protecting arms of the Y. M. C. A. and the Knights of Columbus. I +dared not publish at this time a passage which I had clipped from the +London _Clarion_, in which A. M. Thompson told how he watched the +"doughboys" in the cafes of Paris, with a girl on each knee, and a +glass of wine in each hand. + +I will add one little anecdote, giving you a glimpse of the sex +conventions of war. The American army made desperate efforts to keep +down venereal disease, and required all men to report to their +regimental surgeon immediately after having had sex relations. Our army +moved into Coblentz, and the regulations strictly forbade any +fraternizing with the inhabitants. But immediately it was discovered +that there was an increase of disease, and investigation was made, and +revealed that men had been ceasing to report to the surgeons, because +they were afraid of being punished for having "fraternized with the +enemy." So a new order was issued, providing that having sexual +intercourse would not be considered as "fraternizing." I do not know any +better way to distinguish my ideal of morality from the military ideal, +than to say that according to my understanding of it, the sex +relationship should always and everywhere imply and include +"fraternizing." + +Finally, in concluding this picture of our present-day sex arrangements, +there is a brief word to be said about divorce. In the year 1916, the +last statistics available as I write, there were just over a million +marriages in the United States, and there were over one hundred and +twelve thousand divorces. This would indicate that one marriage in every +nine resulted in shipwreck. But as a matter of fact the proportion is +greater, because the marriages necessarily precede the divorces, and the +proportion of divorces in 1916 should be calculated upon the number of +marriages which took place some five or ten years previously. Of the one +million marriages in 1916, we may say that one in seven or one in eight +will end in the divorce courts. Let this suffice for a glimpse of the +system of marriage-plus-prostitution--a field of weeds which we have +somehow to plow up and prepare for a harvest of rational and honest +love! + + + + +CHAPTER XXXIII + +SEX AND NATURE + + (Maintains that our sex disorders are not the result of natural or + physical disharmony.) + + +Elie Metchnikoff, one of the greatest of scientists, wrote a book +entitled "The Nature of Man," in which he studied the human organism +from the point of view of biology, demonstrating that in our bodies are +a number of relics of past stages of evolution, no longer useful, but +rather a source of danger and harm. We have, for example, in the inner +corner of the eye a relic of that third eyelid whereby the eagle is +enabled to look at the sun. This is a harmless relic. But we have also +an appendix, a degenerate organ of digestion, or gland of secretion, +which now serves as a center of infection and source of danger. We have +likewise a lower bowel, a survival of our hay-eating days, and a cause +of autointoxication and premature death. Among the sources of trouble, +Metchnikoff names the fact that the human male possesses a far greater +quantity of sexual energy than is required for purposes of procreation. +This becomes a cause of disharmony and excess, it causes man to wreck +his health and destroy himself. + +Manifestly, this is a serious matter; for if it is true, our efforts to +find health and happiness in love are doomed to failure, and Lecky is +right when he describes the prostitute as the "guardian of virtue," the +eternal and necessary scapegoat of humanity. But I do not believe it is +true; I think that here is one more case of the endless blundering of +scientists and philosophers who attempt to teach physiology, politics, +religion and law, without having made a study of economics. I do not +believe that the sex troubles of mankind are physiological in their +nature, but have their origin in our present system of class privilege. +I believe they are caused, not by the blunders of nature, but by the +blunders of man as a social animal. + +Let us take a glimpse at primitive man. I choose the Marquesas Islands, +because we have complete reports about them from numerous observers. +Here was a race of people, not interfered with by civilization, who +manifested all that overplus of sexual energy to which Metchnikoff calls +attention. They placed no restraint whatever upon sex activity, they had +no conception of such an idea. Their games and dances were sex play, and +so also, in great part, was their religion. Yet we do not find that they +wrecked themselves. Physically speaking, they were one of the most +perfect races of which we have record. Both the men and women were +beautiful; they were active and strong from childhood to old age, +and--here is the significant thing--they were happy. They were a +laughing, dancing, singing race. They hardly knew grief or fear at all. +They knew how to live, and they enjoyed every process and aspect of +their lives, just as children do, naively and simply. This included +their sex life; and I think it assures us that there can be no such +fundamental physical disharmony in the human organism as the great +Russian scientist thought he had discovered. + +Is it not a fact that throughout nature a superfluity of any kind of +energy or product may be a source of happiness, rather than of distress? +Consider the singing of the birds! Or consider nature's impulse to cover +a field with useless plants, and how by a little cunning, we are able to +turn it into a harvest for our own use! In the life of our bodies one +may show the same thing again and again. We have within us the +possibility of and the impulse toward more muscular activity than our +survival makes necessary; but we do not regard this additional energy as +a curse of nature, and a peril to our lives--we turn out and play +baseball. We have an impulse to see more than is necessary, so we climb +mountains, or go traveling. We have an impulse to hear more, so we go to +a concert. We have an impulse to think more, so we play chess, or whist, +or write books and accumulate libraries. Never do we think of these +activities as signs of an irrevocable blunder on the part of nature. + +But about the activities of love we feel differently; and why is this? +If I say that it is because we have an unwholesome and degraded attitude +toward love, because, as a result of religious superstition we fear it, +and dare not deal with it honestly, the reader may suspect that I am +preparing to hint at some self-indulgence, some form of sex orgy such as +the "turkey trot" and the "bunny hug" and the "grizzly bear," the +"shimmy" and the "toddle" and the "cuddle." I hasten to explain that I +do not mean any of the abnormalities and monstrosities of present-day +fashionable life. Neither do I mean that we should set out to emulate +the happy cannibals in the South Seas. In the Book of the Mind I set +forth as carefully as I knew how, the difference between nature and man, +the life of instinct and the life of reason. It is my conviction that if +civilized life is to go on, there must be a far wider extension of +judgment and self-control in human affairs; our lost happiness will be +found, not by going "back to nature," but by going forward to a new and +higher state, planned by reason and impelled by moral idealism. + +But we find ourselves face to face with horrible sex disorders, and a +great scientist tells us they are nature's tragic blunder, of which we +are the helpless victims. Manifestly, the way to decide this question is +to go to nature, and see if primitive people, having the same physical +organism as ours, had the same troubles and spent their lives in the +same misery. If they did, then it may be that we are doomed; but if they +did not, then we can say with certainty that it is not nature, but +ourselves, who have blundered. Our task then becomes to apply reason to +the problem; to take our present sex arrangements, our field of +bad-smelling weeds, and plow it thoroughly, and sow it with good seed, +and raise a harvest of happiness in love. It is my belief that, +admitting true love--honest and dignified and rational love--it is +possible to pour into it any amount of sex energy, to invent a whole new +system of beautiful and happy love play. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXIV + +LOVE AND ECONOMICS + + (Maintains that our sex disorders are of social origin, due to the + displacing of love by money as a motive in mating.) + + +If the cause of our sex disorders is not physiological, what is it? +Everything in nature must have a cause, and this includes human nature, +the actions and feelings of men, both as individuals and as groups. We +hear the saying: "You can't change human nature"; but the fact is that +human nature is one of the most changeable things in the world. We can +watch it changing from age to age, for better or for worse, and if we +had the intelligence to use the forces now at our command, we could mold +human nature, as precisely as a brewer converts a carload of hops into a +certain brand of beer. Voltaire was author of the saying, "Vice and +virtue are products like vinegar." + +Our civilization is based upon industrial exploitation and class +privilege, the monopoly of the means of production and the natural +sources of wealth by a group. This enables the privileged group to live +in idleness upon the labor of the rest of society; it confers unlimited +power with practically no responsibility--a strain which not one human +being in a thousand has the moral strength to endure. History for the +past five thousand years is one demonstration after another that the +conferring upon a class of power without responsibility means the +collapse of that class and the downfall of its civilization. + +So far as concerns the ruling class male, what the system of privilege +does is to give him unlimited ability to indulge his sex desires. What +it does for the female is to submit her to the male desires, and to +abolish that mutuality in sex, that interaction between male and female +influence, which is the very essence of its purpose. Woman, in a +predatory society, is subject to a double enslavement, that of class as +well as of sex, and the result is the perverting of sexual selection, +and a constantly increasing tendency towards the survival of the unfit. + +In a state of nature the males compete among themselves for the favor of +the female. The female is not raped, nor is she kidnapped; on the +contrary, she exercises her prerogative, she inspects the various male +charms which are set before her, and selects those which please her, +according to her deeply planted instincts. The result is that the weak +and unfit males seldom have a chance to reproduce themselves, and the +procreating is done by the highest specimens of the type. + +But now we have a world which is ruled by money, in which opportunity, +and indeed survival, depend upon money, and the whole tendency of +society is to make money standards supreme. We do not like to admit +this, of course; our instincts revolt against it, and our higher +faculties reinforce the revolt, so we carefully veil our money motives, +and invent polite phrases to conceal them. You will hear people deny it +is money which determines admission into what is called "society," the +intimate life of the ruling class. They will tell you that it is not +money, it is "good taste," "refinement," "charm of personality," and so +on. But if you analyze all these things, you speedily discover that they +are made out of money; they are symbols of the possession of money, +devised by those who possess it, as a means of keeping themselves apart +from those who do not possess it. I would safely defy a member of the +ruling class to name a single element in what he calls "refinement," or +"good taste," that is not in its ultimate analysis a symbol of the +possession of money. Let it be the pronunciation of a word, or the cut +of a coat, or the method of handling a fork--whatever it may be, it is +part of a code, revealing that the person, or more important yet, the +ancestors of the person, have belonged to the leisure class, and have +had time and opportunity to learn to do things in a certain precise +conventional way. I say "conventional," for very frequently these tests +have no relationship whatever to reality. Considered as a matter of +common sense and convenience, it is a great deal better to eat peas with +a spoon than with a fork, and to use both a knife and fork in eating +lettuce; but if you eat peas with a spoon, or use a knife on lettuce, +every member of the ruling class will instantly know that you are an +interloper, as much so as if you took to throwing the china at your +hostess. + +Our culture is a money culture, our standards are money standards, and +our sex decisions are based upon money, not upon love. Any man can have +money in our society, provided the accident of birth favors him, and it +is everywhere known that any man who has money can get a wife. It is +certainly not true that any man with _no_ money can get a wife, and it +is true that most men who have little money have to take wives who have +less--that is, who belong to a lower class, according to the world's +standards. The average young girl of the propertied classes is trained +for marriage as for any other business. She is taught to be sexually +cold, but to imitate sexual excitement deliberately, so as to arouse it +in the male, and to keep herself surrounded with a swarm of males; this +being the basis of her prestige, the factor which will cause the +"eligible" man, the "catch," to desire her. In polite society this +proceeding is known as "coquetry," or "charm," and it would be no +exaggeration to say that seventy-five per cent of all the novels so far +written in the world are expositions of this activity; also that when we +go to the theater, we go in order to watch and sympathize with these +manifestations of pecuniary sexuality. + +As a rule the young girl knows what she is doing, but she is taught to +camouflage it, to preserve her "innocence." She would not dream of +marrying for money; she wants to marry something "distinguished"--that +is to say, something which has received the stamp of approval from a +world which approves money. She wants to marry somebody who is +"elegant," who is in "good form"; she wants to marry without having to +think about the horrid subject of money at all, and so she is carefully +chaperoned, and confined to a world where nothing but money is to be +met. In Tennyson's poem, "The Northern Farmer," the old fellow is +coaching his son on the subject of marriage, and they are driving along +a road, and the farmer listens to his horses' hoofs, and they are +saying, "Proputty, proputty, proputty!" The farmer sums up in one +sentence the doctrine of pecuniary marriage as it is taught to the +ruling class virgin: "Doaen't thee marry for money, but goae wheer money +is." + +In this process, of course, the ruling class virgin must spend a great +deal of money in order to keep up her own prestige; and when she is +married, she must spend it to keep up the prestige of her unmarried +sisters, and then of her children. As a result of this, the only ruling +class males who can afford to marry are the rich ones. There are always +some who are richer, and these are the most desirable; so the tendency +with each generation is to put the period of marriage further off; the +man has to wait until he has accumulated enough "proputty" to satisfy +the girl of his desires--a girl whom he admires because of her pecuniary +prestige. He delays, and meantime he satisfies his passions with the +daughters of the poor. As a result of this, when he does finally come to +marry, he is apt to be unlovely and unlovable. The woman frequently does +not love him at all, but takes him cold-bloodedly because he is +"eligible"; in that case she is a cold and "sexless" wife. Or else, +after she has married him she discovers his unloveliness, and either +decides that all men are selfish brutes, and reconciles herself to a +celibate life, or else she goes out and preys upon the domestic +happiness of other women. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXV + +MARRIAGE AND MONEY + + (Discusses the causes of prostitution, and that higher form of + prostitution known as the "marriage of convenience.") + + +I realize that all these sex problems are complicated. Every case is +individual, and in no two cases can you give exactly the same +explanation. But it is my thesis that whatever the cause, if you trace +down the causes of the cause, you will find economic inequality and +class privilege. It is evident in the lives of the rich, and it is even +more evident in the lives of the poor, who are not permitted the luxury +of pretense. The poor live in a world dominated by forces which they +seldom understand, subjected to enormous pressure which crushes and +destroys them, without their being able to see it or touch it. In the +world of the poor there is first of all poverty; there is insecurity of +employment and insufficiency of wage, and the daily and hourly terror of +starvation and ruin. Above this is a world of power and luxury, a +wonderland of marvels and thrills, seen through a colored mist of +romance. The working-class girl, born to drudgery and perpetual +child-bearing, has a brief hour in which her cheeks are red and her +beauty is ripe; and out of the heaven above her steps a male creature +panoplied in the armor of ruling class prestige--that is to say, a dress +suit--and scattering about him a shower of automobile rides, jewelry and +candy and flowers. She opens her arms to him; and then, when her brief +hour of rapture is past, she becomes the domestic drudge of some +workingman, or else the inmate of a brothel. + +It is a custom of social workers and church people, seeking data about +these painful subjects, to interview numbers of prostitutes, and +question them as to the causes of their "fall"; so you read statistics +to the effect that seventeen per cent of prostitution has an economic +cause, that twenty-six per cent is caused by love of finery, etc. These +pious people, employed by the ruling class to maintain ruling class +prestige by demonstrating that wage slavery has nothing to do with +white slavery, attain their purpose by restricting the word "economic" +to food and shelter; forgetting that young girls do not live by bread +alone, but also by ribbons, and silk stockings, and moving picture +shows, and trips to Coney Island, and everything else that gives a +momentary escape from drudgery into joy. We all understand, of course, +that the daughters of the rich are entitled to joy, and we provide them +with it as a matter of course; but the daughters of the poor are +supposed to work in a cotton mill ten or eleven hours a day from +earliest childhood, and the joy we provide for them is vicarious. As a +woman poet sets it forth: + + "The golf links lie so near the mill + That almost every day + The laboring children can look out + And see the men at play." + +Some years ago my wife and I were invited to meet Mrs. Mary J. Goode, a +keeper of brothels in the "Tenderloin," who had revolted against the +system of police graft, and had exposed it in the newspapers. My wife +questioned her closely as to the psychology of people in her business, +and she insisted that the majority of prostitutes were not oversexed, +nor were they feeble minded; they were women who had loved and trusted, +and had been "thrown down." As Mrs. Goode phrased it, they said to +themselves: "Never again! After this, they'll pay!" + +As a matter of fact, the causes of prostitution are so largely economic +that the other factors are hardly worth mentioning. The sale of sex is +unknown in savage society, and would be unknown in a Socialist society. +If here and there some degenerate individual would rather sell her sex +than do her share of honest labor in a free and just world, such an +individual would become a patient in the psychopathic ward of a public +hospital. Economic forces drive women to prostitution, first, by direct +starvation, and second, by teaching them money standards of prestige, +the ideal of living without working, which is the heaven achieved by the +rich and longed for by the poor. Contributory to the process are +policemen, politicians, and judges who protect the property of the rich, +and prey upon the disinherited; also newspaper editors, college +professors, priests of God and preachers of Jesus, who attribute the +social evil to "original sin," or the "weakness of human nature." + +So far as men are concerned, economic forces operate by three main +channels; late marriage, loveless marriage, and drudgery in wives. You +will find patronizing and maintaining the brothels the following kinds +of males; first, young boys who have been taught that it is "manly" to +gratify their sex impulses; second, young men who take it for granted +that they cannot afford to marry; third, old bachelors who have looked +at marriage and decided that it is not a paying proposition; fourth, +married men who have been picked out for their money, and have come to +the conclusion that "good women" are necessarily sexless; and finally, +married men whose wives have lost the power to charm them by continuous +childbearing, and the physical and nervous strain of domestic slavery. + +This latter applies not merely to the wives of the poor. It applies to +members of the middle classes, and even of the richer classes, because +the job of managing many servants is often as trying as the doing of +one's own work. To explain how domestic drudgery is caused by economic +pressure would require a little essay in itself. The home is the place +where the man keeps his sex property apart under lock and key, and it +is, therefore, the portion of our civilization least influenced by +modern ideas. Women still drudge in separate kitchens and nurseries, as +they have drudged for thousands of years. They cook their dinners over +separate fires, and have each their own little group of children, +generally ill cared for, because the work is done by an untrained +amateur. Moreover, the prestige of this home has to be kept up, because +the social position and future prosperity of the man depend upon it. The +children must be dressed in frilled and starched clothing, which makes +them miserable, and wears out the tempers and pocketbooks of the +mothers. Costly entertainments must be given, and twice a day a meal +must be prepared for the father of the family--all good wives have +learned the ancient formula for the retention of masculine affections: +"Feed the brute!" Living in a world of pecuniary prestige, every +particle of the woman's surplus energy must go into some form of +ostentation, into buying or making things which are futile and +meaningless. In such a blind world, dazed by such a struggle, women +become irritable, they lose their sex charm, they forget all about +love; so the husband gives up hoping for the impossible, accepts the +common idea that love and marriage are incompatible, and adopts the +formula that what his wife doesn't know will not hurt her. + +And step by step, as economic evolution progresses, as vested wealth +becomes more firmly established and claims for itself a larger and +larger share of the total product of society--so step by step you find +the pecuniary ideals becoming more firmly established, you find marriage +becoming more and more a matter of property, and less and less a matter +of love. In European countries there may still be some love marriages +among the poor, but in the upper classes there is no longer any pretense +of such a thing, and if you spoke of it you would be considered absurd. +In countries of fresh and naive commercialism, like America, the women +select the men because of their money prestige; but in Germany, the +process has gone a step further--the men are so firmly established in +their class positions that they insist upon being bought with a fortune. +The same is true when titled foreigners condescend to visit our "land of +the dollar." They will stoop to a vulgar American wife only in case her +parents will make a direct settlement of a fortune upon the husband, and +then they take her back home, and find their escape from boredom in the +highly cultivated mistresses of their own land. + +Everywhere on the Continent, and in Great Britain also, it is accepted +that marriages are matters of business, and only incidentally and very +slightly of affection. The initiative is commonly taken, not by the +young people, but by the heads of the families. Preliminary protocols +are exchanged, and then the family solicitors sit down and bargain over +the matter. If they were making a deal for a carload of hams, they would +be governed by the market price of hams at the moment, also by the +reputation of that particular brand of ham; and similarly, in the case +of marriage, they are governed by the prestige of the family names, and +the market price of husbands prevailing. Always the man exacts a cash +settlement, and in Catholic countries he becomes the outright owner of +all the property of his wife, thus reducing her completely to the status +of a chattel. If any young couple dares to break through these laws of +their class, the whole class unites to trample them down. One of the +greatest of English novelists, George Meredith, wrote his greatest +novel, "The Ordeal of Richard Feverel," to show how, under the most +favorable circumstances, the union of a ruling class youth with a +farmer's daughter could result in nothing but shipwreck. + +The country in which the property marriage is most firmly established is +probably France; and in France the rights of nature are recognized in a +kind of supplementary union, which constitutes what is known as the +"domestic triangle," or in the French language, "_la vie trois_." The +young girl of the French ruling classes is guarded every moment of her +life like a prisoner in jail. She is sold in marriage, and is expected +to bear her husband an heir, possibly two or three children. After that, +she is considered, not under the law or by the church, but by the +general common sense of the community, to be free to seek satisfaction +of her love needs. Her husband has mistresses, and she has a lover, and +to that lover she is faithful, and in her dealings with him she is +guided by an elaborate and subtle code. Practically all French fiction +and drama deal with this "life in threes," and the complications and +tragedies which result from it. I name one novel, simply because it +happens to be the last that I myself have read, "The Red Lily," by +Anatole France. + +Of course, every human being knows in his heart that this is a monstrous +arrangement, and there are periods of revolt when real feeling surges up +in the hearts of men, and we have stories of true love, young and +unselfish love, such for example as Goethe's "Hermann and Dorothea," or +St. Pierre's "Paul and Virginia," or Halevy's "L'Abbe Constantin." +Everybody reads these stories and weeps over them, but everybody knows +that they are like the romantic shepherds and shepherdesses of the +ancient regime; they never had any existence in reality, and are not +meant to be taken seriously. If anybody attempts to carry them into +action, or to preach them seriously to the young, then we know that we +are dealing with a disturber of the foundations of the social order, a +dangerous and incendiary villain, and we give him a name which sends a +shudder down the spine of every friend of law and order--we call him a +"free-lover." + +I see before my eyes the wretch cowering upon the witness stand, and the +virtuous district attorney, who has perhaps spent the previous night in +a brothel, pointing a finger of accusing wrath into his face, and +thundering, "Do you believe in free love?" The wretch, if he is wise, +will not hesitate or parley; he will not ask what the district attorney +means by love, or what he means by freedom. Here in very truth is a case +where "he who hesitates is lost!" Let the wretch instantly answer, No, +he does not believe in free love, he believes in love that pays cash as +it goes; he believes in love that investigates carefully the prevailing +market conditions, decides upon a reasonable price, has the contract in +writing, and lives up to the bargain--"till death do us part." If the +witness be a woman, let the answer be that she believes in slave love; +that she expects to be sold for the benefit of her parents, the prestige +of her family and the social position of her future offspring. Let her +say that she will be a loyal and devoted servant, and will never do +anything at any time to invalidate the contract which is signed for her +by her parents or guardians. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXVI + +LOVE VERSUS LUST + + (Discusses the sex impulse, its use and misuse; when it should be + followed and when repressed.) + + +We have considered the sex disorders of our age and their causes. We +have now to grope our way towards a basis of sanity and health in these +vital matters. + +Consider man, as Metchnikoff describes him, with his overplus of sex +energy. From early youth he is besieged by impulses and desires, and as +a rule is left entirely uninstructed on the subject, having to pick up +his ideas from the conversation of older lads, who have nothing but +misinformation and perversions to give him. Nearly all these older lads +declare and believe that it is necessary to gratify the sex impulse, +that physically it is harmful not to do so. I have even heard physicians +and trainers maintain that idea. Opposed to them are the official +moralists and preachers of religion, who declare that to follow the sex +impulse, except when officially sanctioned by the church, is to commit +sin. + +At different times in my life I have talked with all kinds of people, +young and old, men and women, doctors and clergymen, teachers and +trainers of athletes, and a few wise and loving mothers who have talked +with their own boys and other boys. As a result I have come to agree +with neither side in the debate. I believe that there is a distinction +which must be drawn, and I ask you to consider it carefully, and bear it +in mind in all that I say on the problem of happiness and health in sex. + +I believe that a normal man is one being, manifesting himself in various +aspects, physical, emotional, intellectual. I believe that all these +aspects of human activity go normally together, and cannot normally be +separated, and that the separation of them is a perversion and source of +harm. I believe that the sex impulse, as it normally manifests itself, +and would manifest itself in a man if he were living a normal life, is +an impulse which includes every aspect of the man's being. It is not +merely physical desire and emotional excitement; it is intellectual +curiosity, a deep and intense interest, not merely in the body, but in +the mind and heart and personality of the woman. + +I appreciate that there is opportunity for controversy here. As a matter +of psychology, it is not easy to separate instinct from experience, to +state whether a certain impulse is innate or acquired. Some may argue +that savages know nothing about idealism in sex, neither do those modern +savages whom we breed in city slums; some may make the same assertion +concerning a great mass of loutish and sensual youths. We have got so +far from health and soundness that it is hard to be sure what is +"normal" and what is "ideal." But without going into metaphysics, I +think we can reasonably make the following statement concerning the sex +impulse at its first appearance in the average healthy youth in +civilized societies; that this impulse, going to the roots of the being, +affecting every atom of energy and every faculty, is accompanied, not +merely by happiness, but by sympathetic delight in the happiness of the +woman, by interest in the woman, by desire to be with her, to stay with +her and share her life and protect her from harm. In what I have to say +about the subject from now on, I shall describe this condition of being +and feeling by the word "love." + +But now suppose that men should, for some reason or other, evolve a set +of religious ideas which denied love, and repudiated love, and called it +a sin and a humiliation; or suppose there should be an economic +condition which made love a peril, so that the young couple which +yielded to love would be in danger of starvation, or of seeing their +children starve. Suppose there should be evolved classes of men and +women, held by society in a condition of permanent semi-starvation; +then, under such conditions, the impulse to love would become a trap and +a source of terror. Then the energies of a great many men would be +devoted to suppressing love and strangling it in themselves; then the +intellectual and spiritual sanctions of love would be withdrawn, the +beauty and charm and joy would go out of it, and it would become a +starving beggar at the gates, or a thief skulking in the night-time, or +an assassin with a dagger and club. In other words, sex would become all +the horror that it is today, in the form of purchased vice, and more +highly purchased marriage, and secret shame, and obscure innuendo. So we +should have what is, in a civilized man, a perversion, the possibility +of love which is physical alone; a purely animal thing in a being who is +not purely animal, but is body, mind and spirit all together. So it +would be possible for pitiful, unhappy man, driven by the blind urge of +nature, to conceive of desiring a woman only in the body, and with no +care about what she felt, or what she thought, or what became of her +afterwards. + +That purely physical sex desire I will indicate in our future +discussions by the only convenient word that I can find, which is lust. +The word has religious implications, so I explain that I use it in my +own meaning, as above. There is a great deal of what the churches call +lust, which I call true and honest love; on the other hand, in Christian +churches today, there are celebrated innumerable marriages between +innocent young girls and mature men of property, which I describe as +legalized and consecrated lust. + +We are now in position to make a fundamental distinction. I assert the +proposition that there does not exist, in any man, at any time of his +life, or in any condition of his health, a necessity for yielding to the +impulses of lust; and I say that no man can yield to them without +degrading his nature and injuring himself, not merely morally, but +mentally, and in the long run physically. I assert that it is the duty +of every man, at all times and under all circumstances, to resist the +impulses of lust, to suppress and destroy them in his nature, by +whatever expenditure of will power and moral effort may be required. + +I know physicians who maintain the unpopular thesis that serious damage +may be done to the physical organism of both man and woman by the long +continued suppression of the sex-life. Let me make plain that I am not +disagreeing with such men. I do not deny that repression of the sex-life +may do harm. What I do deny is that it does any harm to repress a +physical desire which is unaccompanied by the higher elements of sex; +that is to say, by affection, admiration, and unselfish concern for the +sex-partner and her welfare. When I advise a man to resist and suppress +and destroy the impulse toward lust in his nature, I am not telling him +to live a sexless life. I am telling him that if he represses lust, then +love will come; whereas, if he yields to lust, then love may never come, +he may make himself incapable of love, incapable of feeling it or of +trusting it, or of inspiring it in a woman. And I say that if, on the +other hand, he resists lust, he will pour all the energies of his being +into the channels of affection and idealism. Instead of having his +thoughts diverted by every passing female form, his energies will become +concentrated upon the search for one woman who appeals to him in +permanent and useful ways. We may be sure that nature has not made men +and women incompatible, but on the contrary, has provided for +fulfillment of the desires of both. The man will find some woman who is +looking for the thing which he has to offer--that is, love. + +And now, what about the suppression of love? Here I am willing to go as +far as any physician could desire, and possibly farther. Speaking +generally, and concerning normal adult human beings, I say that the +suppression of love is a crime against nature and life. I say that long +continued and systematic suppression of love exercises a devastating +effect, not merely upon the body, but upon the mind and all the energies +of the being. I say that the doctrine of the suppression of love, no +matter by whom it is preached, is an affront to nature and to life, and +an insult to the creator of life. I say that it is the duty of all men +and women, not merely to assert their own right to love, but to devote +their energies to a war upon whatever ideas and conventions and laws in +society deny the love-right. + +The belief that long continued suppression of love does grave harm has +been strongly reinforced in the last few years by the discovery of +psycho-analysis, a science which enables us to explore our unconscious +minds, and lay bare the secrets of nature's psychic workshop. These +revelations have made plain that sex plays an even more important part +in our mental lives than we realized. Sex feeling manifests itself, not +merely in grown people, but in the tiniest infants; in these latter it +has of course no object in the opposite sex, but the physical sensations +are there, and some of their outward manifestations; and as the infant +grows, and realizes the outside world, the feelings come to center upon +others, the parents first of all. These manifestations must be guided, +and sometimes repressed; but if this is done violently, by means of +terror, the consequences may be very harmful--the wrong impulses or the +terrors may survive as a "complex" in the unconscious mind, and cause a +long chain of nervous disorders and physical weaknesses in the adult. +These things are no matter of guesswork, they have been proven as +thoroughly as any scientific discovery, and are used in a new technic of +healing. Of course, as with every new theory, there are unbalanced +people who carry it to extremes. There are fanatics of Freudianism who +talk as if everything in the human unconsciousness were sex; but that +need not blind us to the importance of these new discoveries, and the +confirmation they bring to the thesis that sane and normal love, wisely +guided by common sense and reasoned knowledge, is at a certain period of +life a vital necessity to every sound human being. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXVII + +CELIBACY VERSUS CHASTITY + + (The ideal of the repression of the sex impulse, as against the + ideal of its guidance and cultivation.) + + +There are two words which we need in this discussion, and as they are +generally used loosely, they must now be defined precisely. The two +words are celibacy and chastity. We define celibacy as the permanent and +systematic suppression of love. We define chastity, on the other hand, +as the permanent and systematic suppression of lust. Chastity, as the +word is here used, is not a denial of love, but a preparing for it; it +is the practice and the ideal, necessary especially in the young, of +consecrating their beings to the search for love, and to becoming worthy +for love. In that sense we regard chastity as one of the most essential +of virtues in the young. It is widely taught today, but ineffectively, +because unintelligently and without discrimination; because, in other +words, it is confused with celibacy, which is a perversion of life, and +one of humanity's intellectual and moral diseases. + +The origin of the ideal of celibacy is easy to understand. At a certain +stage in human development the eyes of the mind are opened, and to some +man comes a revelation of the life of altruism and sympathetic +imagination. To use the common phrase, the man discovers his spiritual +nature. But under the conditions then prevailing, all the world outside +him is in a conspiracy to strangle that nature, to drag it down and +trample it into the mire. One of the most powerful of these destructive +agencies, as it seems to the man, is sex. By means of sex he is laid +hold upon by strange and terrible creatures who do not understand his +higher vision, but seek only to prey upon him, and use him for their +convenience. At the worst they rob him of everything, money, health, +time and reputation; at best, they saddle him and bridle him, they put +him in harness and set him to dragging a heavy load. In the words of a +wise old man of the world, Francis Bacon, "He who marries and has +children gives hostages to fortune." In a world wherein war, pestilence, +and famine held sway, the man of family had but slight chance of +surviving as a philosopher or prophet or saint. Discovering in himself a +deep-rooted and overwhelming impulse to fall into this snare, he +imagined a devil working in his heart; so he fled away to the desert, +and hid in a cave, and starved himself, and lashed himself with whips, +and allowed worms and lice to devour his body, in the effort to destroy +in himself the impulse of sex. + +So the world had monasteries, and a religious culture, not of much use, +but better than nothing; and so we still have in the world celibate +priesthoods, and what is more dangerous to our social health, we have +the old, degraded notions of the essential vileness of the sex +relationship--notions permeating all our thought, our literature, our +social conventions and laws, making it impossible for us to attain true +wisdom and health and happiness in love. + +I say the ideal of celibacy is an intellectual and moral disease; it is +a violation of nature, and nature devotes all her energies to breaking +it down, and she always succeeds. There never has been a celibate +religious order, no matter how noble its origin and how strict its +discipline, which has not sooner or later become a breeding place of +loathsome unnatural vices. And sooner or later the ideal begins to +weaken, and common sense to take its place, and so we read in history +about popes who had sons, and we see about us priests who have "nieces" +and attractive servant girls. Make the acquaintance of any police +sergeant in any big city of America, and get him to chatting on friendly +terms, and you will discover that it is a common experience for the +police in their raids upon brothels to catch the representatives of +celibate religious orders. As one old-timer in the "Tenderloin" of New +York said to me, "Of course, we don't make any trouble for the good +fathers." Nor was this merely because the old sergeant was an Irishman +and a Catholic; it was because deep down in his heart he knew, as every +man knows, that the craving of a man for the society and companionship +of a woman is an overwhelming craving, which will break down every +barrier that society may set against it. + +There is another form of celibacy which is not based upon religious +ideas, but is economic in its origin, and purely selfish in its nature. +It is unorganized and unreasoned, and is known as "bachelorhood"; it has +as its complements the institutions of old maidenhood and of +prostitution. Both forms of celibacy, the religious and the economic, +are entirely incompatible with chastity, which is only possible where +love is recognized and honored. Chastity is a preparation for love; and +if you forbid love, whether by law, or by social convention, or by +economic strangling, you at once make chastity a Utopian dream. You may +preach it from your pulpits until you are black in the face; you may +call out your Billy Sundays to rave, and dance, and go into convulsions; +you may threaten hell-fire and brimstone until you throw whole audiences +into spasms--but you will never make them chaste. On the contrary, +strange and horrible as it may seem, those very excitements will turn +into sexual excitements before your eyes! So subtle is our ancient +mother nature, and so determined to have her own way! + +The abominable old ideal of celibacy, with its hatred of womanhood, its +distrust of happiness, its terror of devils, is not yet dead in the +world. It is in our very bones, and is forever appearing in new and +supposed to be modern forms. Take a man like Tolstoi, who gained +enormous influence, not merely in Russia, but throughout the world among +people who think themselves liberal--humanitarians, pacifists, +philosophic anarchists. Tolstoi's notions about sex, his teachings and +writings and likewise his behavior toward it, were one continuous +manifestation of disease. All through his youth and middle years, as an +army officer, popular novelist, and darling of the aristocracy, his life +was one of license, and the attitude toward women he thus acquired, he +never got out of his thoughts to his last day. Gorky, meeting him in his +old age, reports his conversation as unpleasantly obscene, and his whole +attitude toward women one of furtive and unwholesome slyness. + +But Tolstoi was in other ways a great soul, one of the great moral +consciences of humanity. He looked about him at a world gone mad with +greed and hate, and he made convulsive efforts to reform his own spirit +and escape the power of evil. As regards sex, his thought took the form +of ancient Christian celibacy. Man must repudiate the physical side of +sex, he must learn to feel toward women a "pure" affection, the +relationship of brother and sister. In his novel, "Resurrection," +Tolstoi portrays a young aristocrat who meets a beautiful peasant girl +and conceives for her such a noble and generous emotion; but gradually +the poison of physical sex-desire steals into his mind, he seduces her, +and she becomes a prostitute. Later in life, when he discovers the crime +he has committed, he humbles himself and follows her into exile, and +wins her to God and goodness by the unselfish and unsexual love which he +should have maintained from the beginning. + +It was Tolstoi's teaching that all men should aspire toward this kind of +love, and when it was pointed out to him that if this doctrine were to +be applied universally, the human race would become extinct, his answer +was that there was no reason to fear that, because only a few people +would be good enough and strong enough to follow the right ideal! Here +you see the reincarnation of the old Christian notion that we are +"conceived in sin and born in iniquity." We may be pure and good, and +cease to exist; or we may sin, and let life continue. Some choose to +sin, and these sinners hand down their sinful qualities to the future; +and so virtue and goodness remain what they have always been, a futile +crying out in the wilderness by a few religious prophets, whom God has +sent to call down destruction upon a world which He had made--through +some mistake never satisfactorily explained! + +It is easy nowadays to persuade intelligent people to laugh at such a +perverted view of life; but the truth is that this attitude toward sex +is written, not merely into our religious creeds and formulas, but into +most of our laws and social conventions. It is this, which for +convenience I will call the "monkish" view of love, which prevents our +dealing frankly and honestly with its problems, distinguishing between +what is wrong and what is right, and doing anything effective to remedy +the evils of marriage-plus-prostitution. That is why I have tried so +carefully to draw the distinction between what I call love and what I +call lust; between the ideal of celibacy, which is a perversion, and the +idea of chastity, which must form an essential part of any regimen of +true and enduring love. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXVIII + +THE DEFENSE OF LOVE + + (Discusses passionate love, its sanction, its place in life, and + its preservation in marriage.) + + +I have before me as I write a newspaper article by Robert Blatchford, a +great writer and great man. He is dealing with the subject of "Love and +Marriage," and his doctrine is summed up in the following sentences: +"There is a difference between loving a woman and falling in love with +her. The love one falls into is a sweet illusion. But that fragrant +dream does not last. In marriage there are no fairies." + +This expresses one of the commonest ideas in the world. Passionate love +is one thing, and marriage is another and different thing, and it is no +more possible to reconcile them than to mix oil and water. Our notions +of "romantic" love took their rise in the Middle Ages, from the songs +and narratives of the troubadours, and this whole tradition was based +upon the glorification of illegitimate and extra-marital love. That +tradition has ruled the world of art ever since, and rules it today. I +do not exaggerate when I say that it is the conventional view of grand +opera and the drama, of moving pictures and novels, that impassioned and +thrilling love is found before marriage, and is found in adultery and in +temptations to adultery, but is never found in marriage. I have a pretty +varied acquaintance with the literature of the world, and I have sat and +thought for quite a while, without being able to recall a single +portrait of life which contradicts this thesis; and certainly anyone +familiar with literature could name ten thousand novels and dramas and +grand operas which support the thesis. + +English and American Puritanism have beaten the tradition down to this +extent: the novelist portrays the glories and thrills of young love, and +carries it as far as the altar and the orange blossoms and white ribbons +and showers of rice--and stops. He leaves you to assume that this +delightful rapture continues forever after; but he does not attempt to +show it to you--he would not dare attempt to show it, because the +general experience of men and women in marriage would make him +ridiculous. So he runs away from the issue; if he tells you a story of +married life, it is a story of a "triangle"--the thrills of love +imperiling marriage, and either crushed out, or else wrecking the lives +of the victims. Such is the unanimous testimony of all our arts today, +and I submit it as evidence of the fact that there must be something +vitally wrong with our marriage system. + +Personally, I am prepared to go as far as the extreme sex-radical in the +defense of love and the right to love. I believe that love is the most +precious of all the gifts of life. I accept its sanctions and its +authority. I believe that it is to be cherished and obeyed, and not to +be run away from or strangled in the heart. I believe that it is the +voice of nature speaking in the depths of us, and speaking from a wisdom +deeper than we have yet attained, or may attain for many centuries to +come. And when I say love, I do not mean merely affection. I do not mean +merely the habit of living in the same home, which is the basis of +marriage as Blatchford describes it. What I mean is the love of the +poets and the dreamers, the "young love" which is thrill and ecstasy, a +glorification and a transfiguration of the whole of life. I say that, +far from giving up this love for marriage, it is the true purpose of +marriage to preserve this love and perpetuate it. + +To save repetition and waste of words, let us agree that from now on +when I use the word love, I mean the passionate love of those who are +"in love." I believe that it is the right of men and women to be "in +love," and that there is no true marriage unless they are "in love," and +stay "in love." I believe that it is possible to apply reason to love, +to learn to understand love and the ways of love, to protect it and keep +it alive in marriage. Blatchford writes the sentence, "Matrimony cannot +be all honeymoon." I answer that assuredly it can be, and if you ask me +how I know, I tell you that I know in the only way we really know +anything--because I have proven it in my own life. I say that if men and +women would recognize the perpetuation of the honeymoon as the purpose +of marriage, and would devote to that end one-hundredth part of the +intelligence and energy they now devote to the killing of their fellow +human beings in war, we might have an end to the wretched "romantic +tradition" which makes the most sacred emotion of the human heart into +a sneak-thief skulking in the darkness, entering our lives by back +alleys and secret stairways--while greed and worldly pomp, dullness and +boredom, parade in by the front entrance. + +In the first place, what is love--young love, passionate love, the love +of those who "fall in"? I know a certain lady, well versed in worldly +affairs, who says that it is at once the greatest nonsense and the +deadliest snare in the world. This lady was trained as a "coquette"; +she, and all the young ladies she knew, made it their business to cause +men to fall in love with them, and their prestige was based upon their +skill in that art. So to them "love" was a joke, and men "in love" were +victims, whether ridiculous or pitiable. To this I answer that I know +nothing in life that cannot be "faked"; but an imitation has value only +as it resembles something that is real, and that has real value. + +I am aware that it is possible for a society to be so corrupted, so +given up to the admiration of imitations, of the paint and powder and +silk-stocking-clad-ankle kind of love, that true and genuine love +interest, with its impulse to self-sacrifice and self-consecration, is +no longer felt or understood. I am aware that in such a society it is +possible for even the very young to be so sophisticated that what they +take to be love is merely vanity, the worship of money, and the grace +and charm which the possession of money confers. I have known girls who +were "head over heels" in love, and thought it was with a man, when +quite clearly they were in love with a dress suit or a social position. +In such a society it is hard to talk about natural emotions, and deep +and abiding and disinterested affections. + +Nevertheless, amid all the false conventions, the sham glories and +cowardices of our civilization, there abides in the heart the craving +for true love, and the idea of it leaps continually into flame in the +young. In spite of the ridicule of the elders, in spite of blunders and +tragic failures, in spite of dishonesties and deceptions--nevertheless, +it continues to happen that out of a thousand maidens the youth finds +one whose presence thrills him with a new and terrible emotion, whose +lightest touch makes him shiver, almost makes his knees give way. + +If you will recall what I have written about instinct and reason, you +will know that I am not a blind worshipper of our ancient mother +nature. I am not humble in my attitude toward her, but perfectly willing +to say when I know more than she does. On the other hand, when I know +nothing or next to nothing, I am shy of contradicting my ancient mother, +and disposed to give respectful heed to her promptings. One of the +things about which we know almost nothing at present is the subject of +eugenics. We are only at the beginning of trying to find out what +matings produce the best offspring. Meantime, we ought to consider those +indications which nature gives us, just as we consider her advice about +what food to eat and what rest to take. + +It is not my idea that science will ever take men and women and marry +them in cold blood, as today we breed our cattle. What I think will +happen is that young men and women will meet one another, as they do at +present, and will find the love impulse awakening; they will then submit +their love to investigation, as to whether they should follow that +impulse, or should wait. In other words, I do not believe that science +will ever do away with the raptures of love, but will make itself the +servant of these raptures, finding out what they mean, and how their +precious essence may be preserved. + +I perfectly understand that the begetting of children is not the only +purpose of love. The children have to be reared and trained, which means +that a home has to be founded, and the parents have to learn to +co-operate. They have to have common aims in life, and temperaments +sufficiently harmonious so that they can live in the house together +without tearing each other's eyes out. This means that in any civilized +society all impulses of love have to be subjected to severe criticism. I +intend, before long, to show just how I think parents and guardians +should co-operate with young people in love; to help them to understand +in advance what they are doing, and how it may be possible for them to +make their love permanent and successful. For the moment I merely state, +to avoid any possible misunderstanding, that I am the last person in the +world to favor what is called "blind" love, the unthinking abandonment +to an impulse of sex passion. What I am trying to show is that the +passionate impulse, the passionate excitement of the young couple, is +the material out of which love and marriage are made. Passion is a part +of us, and a fundamental part. If we do not find a place for it in +marriage, it will seek satisfaction outside of marriage, and that means +lying, or the wrecking of the marriage, or both. + +Passion is what gives to love and marriage its vitality, its energy, its +drive; in fact, it gives these qualities to the whole character. It is a +vivifying force, transfiguring the personality, and if it is crushed and +repressed, the whole life of that person is distorted. Yet it is a fact +which every physician knows, that millions of women marry and live their +whole lives without ever knowing what passionate gratification is. As a +consequence of this, millions of men take it for granted that there are +"good" women and "bad" women, and that only the latter are interesting. +This, of course, is simply one of the abnormalities caused by the +supplanting of love by money as a motive in marriage. Love becomes a +superfluity and a danger, and all the forces of society, including +institutionalized religion, combine to outlaw it and drive it +underground. Or we might say that they lock it in a dungeon--and that +the supreme delight of all the painters, poets, musicians, dramatists +and novelists of all climes and all periods of history, is to portray +the escape of the "young god" from these imprisonments. The story is +told in six words of an old English ballad: "Love will find out the +way!" + +Is it not obvious that there must be something vitally wrong with our +institutions and conventions in matters of sex, when here exists this +eternal war between our moralists and our artists? Why not make up our +minds what we really believe; whether it is true that poets are, as +Shelley said, "the unacknowledged legislators of mankind," or whether +they are, as Plato declared, false teachers and seducers of the young. +If they are the latter, let us have done with them, let us drive them +from the state, together with lovers and all other impassioned persons. +But if, on the other hand, it is truth the poets tell about life, then +let us take the young god out of his dungeon, and bring him into our +homes by the front door, and cast out the false gods of vanity and greed +and worldly prestige which now sit in his place. + + + + +CHAPTER XXXIX + +BIRTH CONTROL + + (Deals with the prevention of conception as one of the greatest of + man's discoveries, releasing him from nature's enslavement, and + placing the keys of life in his hands.) + + +I assume that you have followed my argument, and are prepared to +consider seriously whether it may be possible to establish love in +marriage as the sex institution of civilized society. If you really wish +to bring such an institution into existence, the first thing you have to +do is to accomplish the social revolution; that is, you must wipe out +class control of society, and prestige based upon money exploitation. +But that is a vast change, and will take time, and meanwhile we have to +live, and wish to live with as little misery as possible. So the +practical question becomes this: Suppose that you, as an individual, +wish to find as much happiness in love as may now be possible, what +counsel have I to offer? If you are young, you wish this advice for +yourself; while if you are mature, you wish it for your children. I will +put my advice under four heads: First, marriage for love; second, birth +control; third, early marriage; fourth, education for marriage. + +The first of these we have considered at some length. A part of the +process of social revolution is personal conversion; the giving up by +every individual of the worldly ideal, the surrender of luxury and +self-indulgence, the consecrating of one's life to self education and +the cause of social justice. And do not think that that is an easy +thing, or an unimportant thing, a thing to be taken for granted. On the +contrary, it is something that most of us have to struggle with at every +hour of our lives, because respect for property and worldly conventions +has become one of our deepest instincts; our whole society is poisoned +with it, and I can count on the fingers of one hand the people I have +known in my life who have completely escaped from it. It is not merely a +question of refusing to marry except for love, it is a question of +refusing to love except for honest and worthy qualities. It is a +question of saving our children from the damnable forces of snobbery, +which lay siege to their young minds and destroy the best impulses of +their hearts, while we in our blindness are still thinking of them as +babies. + +Of the other three topics that I have suggested, I begin with birth +control, because it is the most fundamental and most important. Without +birth control there can be no freedom, no happiness, no permanence in +love, and there can be no mastery of life. Birth control is one of the +great fundamental achievements of the human reason, as important to the +life of mankind as the discovery of fire or the invention of printing. +Birth control is the deliverance of womankind, and therefore of mankind +also, from the blind and insane fecundity of nature, which created us +animals, and would keep us animals forever if we did not rebel. + +Ever since the dawn of history, and probably for long ages before that, +our race has been struggling against this blind insanity of nature. +Poor, bewildered Theodore Roosevelt stormed at what he called "race +suicide," thinking it was some brand new and terrible modern corruption; +but nowhere do we find a primitive tribe, nowhere in history do we find +a race which did not seek to save itself from overgrowth and consequent +starvation. They did not know enough to prevent conception, but they did +the best they could by means of abortion and infanticide. And because +today superstition keeps the priceless knowledge of contraception from +the vast majority of women, these crude, savage methods still prevail, +and we have our million abortions a year in the United States. Assuming +that something near one-fourth our population consists of women capable +of bearing children, we have one woman in twenty-five going through this +agonizing and health-wrecking experience every year. They go through +with it, you understand, regardless of everything--all the moralists and +preachers and priests with their hell fire and brimstone. They go +through with it because we have both marriage without love, and love +without marriage; also because we permit some ten or twenty per cent of +our total population to suffer the pangs of perpetual starvation, +because more than half our farms are mortgaged or occupied by tenants, +and some ten or twenty per cent of our workers are out of jobs all the +time. + +Some of our women know about birth control. They are the rich women, who +get what they want in this world. They object to the humiliations and +inconveniences of child bearing, and some of them raise one or two +children, and others of them raise poodle dogs. Also, our middle classes +have found out; our doctors and lawyers and college professors, and +people of that sort. But we deliberately keep the knowledge from our +foreign populations, by the terrors which the church has at its command. +And what is the practical consequence of this procedure? It is that +while all our Anglo-Saxon stock, those who founded our country and +established its institutions, are gradually removing themselves from the +face of the earth, our ignorant and helpless populations, whether in +city slums or on tenant farms, are multiplying like rabbits. Read Jack +London's "The Valley of the Moon" and see what is happening in +California. You will find the same thing happening in any portion of the +United States where you take the trouble to use your own eyes. + +Now, I try to repress such impulses toward race prejudice as I find in +myself. I am willing to admit for the sake of this argument that in the +course of time all the races that are now swarming in America, +Portuguese and Japanese and Mexican and French-Canadian and Polish and +Hungarian and Slovakian, are capable of just as high intellectual +development as our ancestors who wrote the Declaration of Independence. +But no one who sees the conditions under which they now live can deny +that it will take a good deal of labor, teaching them and training them, +as well as scrubbing them, to accomplish that result. And what a waste +of energy, what a farce it makes of culture, to take the people who have +already been scrubbed and taught and trained for self-government, and +exterminate them, and raise up others in their place! It seems time that +we gave thought to the fundamental question, whether or not there is +something self-destroying in the very process of culture. Unless we can +answer this we might as well give up our visions and our efforts to lift +the race. + +Theodore Roosevelt stormed at birth control for something like ten +years, and it would be interesting if we could know how many Anglo-Saxon +babies he succeeded in bringing into the world by his preachments. If +what he wanted was to correct the balance between native and foreign +births, how much more sensible to have taught birth control to those +poor, pathetic, half-starved and overworked foreign mothers of our slums +and tenant farms! I can wager that for every Anglo-Saxon baby that +Theodore Roosevelt brought into the world by his preachings, he could +have kept out ten thousand foreign slum babies, if only he had lent his +aid to Margaret Sanger! + +Ah, but he wanted all the babies to be born, you say! I see before me +the face of a certain devout old Christian lady, known to me, who +settles the question by the Bible quotation, "Be fruitful and multiply." +But what avails it to follow this biblical advice, if we allow one out +of five of the new-born infants to perish from lack of scientific care +before they are two years old? What avails it if we send them to school +hungry, as we do twenty-two per cent of the public school children of +New York City? What avails it if we allow venereal disease to spread, so +that a large percentage of the babies are deformed and miserable? What +avails it if, when they are fully grown, we can think of nothing better +to do with them than to take them by millions at a time and dress them +up in uniforms and send them out to be destroyed by poison gases? Would +it not be the part of common sense to establish universal birth control +for at least a year or two--until we have learned to take care of our +newly born babies, and to feed our school children, and to protect our +youths from vice, and to abolish poverty and war from the earth? + +These are the social aspects of birth control. There are also to be +considered what I might call the personal aspects of it. Because young +people do not know about it, and have no way to find out about it, they +dare not marry, and so the amount of vice in the world is increased. +Because married women do not know about it, love is turned to terror, +and marital happiness is wrecked. Because the harmless and proper +methods are not sensibly taught, people use harmful methods, which cause +nervous disorders, and wreck marital happiness, and break up homes. +Thorough and sound knowledge about birth control is just as essential to +happiness in marriage as knowledge of diet is necessary to health, or as +knowledge of economics is necessary to intelligent action as a voter and +citizen. The suppression by law of knowledge of birth control is just as +grave a crime against human life as ever was committed by religious +bigotry in the blackest days of the Spanish Inquisition. + +Now this law stands on the statute books of our country, and if I should +so much as hint to you in this book what you need to know, or even where +you can find out about it, I should be liable to five years in jail and +a fine of $5,000, and every person who mailed a copy of this book, or +any advertisement of this book, would be in the same plight. But there +is not yet a law to prohibit agitation against the law, so the first +thing I say to every reader of this book is that they should obtain a +copy of the _Birth Control Review_, published at 104 Fifth Avenue, New +York, and also should join the Voluntary Parenthood League, 206 +Broadway, New York. Get the literature of these organizations and +circulate them and help spread the light! + +As to the knowledge which you need, the only advice I am allowed to give +is that you should seek it. Seek it, and persist in seeking, until you +find it. Ask everyone you know; and ask particularly among enlightened +people, those who are willing to face the facts of human life and trust +in reason and common sense. I do not know if I am violating the law in +thus telling you how to find out about birth control. One of the +charming features of this law, and others against the spreading of +knowledge, is that they will never tell you in advance what you may say, +but leave you to say it and take your chances! I believe that I am not +violating any law when I tell you that there are half a dozen simple, +inexpensive, and entirely harmless methods of preventing undesired +parenthood without the destruction of the marital relationship. + +I am one of those who for many years believed that the destruction of +the marital relationship was the only proper and moral method. I was +brought up to take the monkish view of love. I thought it was an animal +thing which required some outside justification. I had been taught +nothing else; but now I have had personal experience of other +justifications of love, and I believe that love is a beautiful and +joyful relationship, which not merely requires no other justification, +but confers justification upon many other things in life. + +I used to believe in that old ideal of celibacy, thinking it a fine +spiritual exercise. But since then I have looked out on life, and have +found so many interesting things to do, so much important work calling +for attention, that I do not have to invent any artificial exercises for +my spirit. I have looked at humanity, and brought myself to recognize +the plain common sense fact--that whatever superfluous energy I may have +to waste upon artificial spirituality, the great mass of the people have +no such energy to spare. They need all their energies to get a living +for themselves and for their wives and little ones. They have their sex +impulses, and will follow them, and the only question is, shall they +follow them wisely or unwisely? The religious people decide that sexual +indulgence is wrong, and they impose a penalty--and what is that +penalty? A poor, unwanted little waif of a soul, which never sinned, and +had nothing to do with the matter, is brought into a hostile world, to +suffer neglect, and perhaps starvation--in order to punish parents who +did not happen to be sufficiently strong willed to practice continence +in marriage! + +I used to believe that there was benefit to health and increase of +power, whether physical or mental, in the celibate life. I have tried +both ways of life, and as a result I know that that old idea is +nonsense. I know now that love is a natural function. Of course, like +any other function it can be abused; just as hunger may become gluttony, +sleeping may become sluggishness, getting the money to pay one's way +through life may become ferocious avarice. But we do not on this account +refuse ever to eat or sleep or get money to pay our debts. I do not say +that I believe, I say I know, that free and happy love, guided by wisdom +and sound knowledge, is not merely conducive to health, but is in the +long run necessary to health. + +People who condemn birth control always argue as if one wished to teach +this knowledge indiscriminately to the young. Perhaps it is natural that +those who oppose the use of reason should assume that others are as +irrational as themselves. All I can say is that I no more believe in +teaching birth control to the young than I believe in feeding beefsteak +to nursing infants. There is a period in life for beefsteaks--or, if my +vegetarian friends prefer, for lentil hash and peanut butter sandwiches; +in exactly the same way there is a time for teaching the fundamentals of +sex, and another time for teaching the art of happiness in marriage, +which includes birth control. That brings me, by a very pleasant +transition, to the other two subjects which I have promised to discuss: +early marriage and education for marriage. + + + + +CHAPTER XL + +EARLY MARRIAGE + + (Discusses love marriages, how they can be made, and the duty of + parents in respect to them.) + + +I have shown how economic forces in our society make for later and later +marriage; and at the present time economic forces are so overwhelming +that all other forces are hardly worth mentioning in comparison. You +are, let us say, the mother of a boy of eighteen, and you have what you +call "common sense"--meaning thereby a grasp of the money facts of life. +If your darling boy of eighteen should come to you with a grave face and +announce, "Mother dear, I have met the girl I love, and we have decided +that we want to get married"--you would consider that the most absurd +thing you had ever heard in all your born days, and you would tell the +lad that he was a baby, and to run along and play. If he persisted in +his crazy notion, you and your husband and all the brothers and sisters +and relatives and friends both of the boy and the girl would set to +work, by scolding and ridiculing, to make life a misery for them, and +ninety-nine times out of a hundred you would break down the young +couple's marital intention. + +But now, let us try another supposition. Let us suppose that your +darling boy of eighteen should come to you again and say, "Mother dear, +some of the boys are going to spend this evening in a brothel, and I +have decided to go along." Would you think that was the most absurd +thing you had ever heard in all your born days? Or would you answer, +"Yes, of course, my boy; that is what I had in mind when I made you give +up the girl you loved"? No, you would not answer that. But here is the +vital fact--it doesn't matter what you would answer, for you would never +have a chance to answer. When a mother's darling wants to get married, +he comes and asks his mother's blessing; but never does a mother's +darling ask a blessing before he goes with the other boys to a brothel. +He just goes. Maybe he borrows the money from some other fellow, and +next day tells you he went to a theater. Or maybe he picks up some poor +man's daughter on the street, and takes her into the park, or up on the +roof of a tenement. Some such thing he does, to find satisfaction for an +instinct which you in your worldly wisdom or your heavenly piety spurn +and ridicule. + +I do not wish to exaggerate. If you are an exceptionally wise and +tactful mother, you may keep the confidence of your boy, and guide him +day by day through his temptations and miseries, and keep him chaste. +But the more you try that, the more apt you will be to come to my +conclusion, that late marriage is a crime against the race; the more +aware you will be of the danger, either that his boy friends may break +him down, or that some lewd woman may come to his bedroom in the +night-time. Never will you be able to be quite sure that he is not lying +to you, because of his shame, and the pain he cannot bear to inflict +upon you. Never will you be quite sure that he is not hiding some cruel +disease, sneaking off to some quack who takes his money and leaves him +worse than before--until finally he shoots off his head, as happened to +a nephew of an old and dear friend of mine. + +Such is the problem of the mother of a son; and now, what about the +mother of a daughter? This seems much simpler; because your daughter is +not generally troubled with sex cravings, and if you teach her the +proprieties, and see that she is carefully chaperoned, you may +reasonably hope that she will be chaste. But some day you expect that +she will marry; and then comes your problem. If you are the usual +mother, you are looking for some one who can maintain her in the state +of life to which she is accustomed. If a fairy prince would come along, +or a plaster saint, you would be pleased; but failing that, you will +take a successful business man, one who has made his way in the world +and secured himself a position. But turn back to the figures I gave you +a while ago. If this man is thirty years of age, there is at least a +fifty-fifty chance that he has had some venereal disease; and while the +doctors claim to cure these diseases absolutely, we must bear in mind +that doctors are human, and sometimes claim more than they perform. +Every doctor will admit, if you pin him down, that these diseases burrow +deeply into the tissues, and many times are supposed to be cured when +they are only hidden. + +Here is, in a nutshell, the problem of the mother of a daughter. If you +marry your daughter at seventeen to a lad of her own age, you have a +very good chance of marrying her to a person who is chaste. If you marry +her to a man of twenty-five, you have perhaps one chance in a hundred. +If you marry her to a man of thirty-five, you have perhaps one chance in +ten thousand. You may not like these facts; I do not like them myself; +but I have learned that facts are none the less facts on that account. + +You know the average society bud of eighteen, and her attitude to a boy +of the same age. She regards him as a child; and you think, perhaps, +that it is natural for a girl to be interested in men of thirty-five and +even forty-five. But I tell you that it is not natural, it is simply one +of the perversions of pecuniary sex. The girl is interested in such men, +because all her young life she has been carefully coached for the +marriage market; because she is dressed for it, and solemnly brought +out, and introduced to other players of this exciting game of marriage +for money, with its incredible prizes of automobiles and jewels and +palaces full of servants, and magic check-books that never grow empty. +But suppose that, instead of regarding her as a prize in a lottery, you +let her grow up naturally, and taught her the truth about herself, both +body and mind; suppose that, instead of dressing her in ways +deliberately contrived to emphasize her sex, you put her in a simple +uniform, and taught her to be honest and straightforward, instead of +mincing and coy; suppose she played athletic games with boys of her own +age, and invited them to her home, not for "jazz" dancing and stuffing +cake and candy, but for the sharing of good music and literature and +art--don't you think that maybe this girl might become interested in a +lad of her own age, and choose him with some understanding of his real +self? + +You take it for granted that young people should not marry until they +can "afford it." But stop and consider, is not this a relic of old days? +Always it takes time, and deliberate effort of the reason, to adjust our +conventions to new facts; so face this fact--marriage today does not +necessarily mean children, it may just mean love. It involves little +more expense, because the young people need cost no more together than +they cost in the separate homes of their parents. If they are children +of the poor, they are already taking care of themselves. If they are +children of the moderately well off, their parents expect to support +them while they are getting an education; and why can they not just as +well live together, and the parents of each contribute their share? Let +the parents of the boy give him, not merely what it costs to keep him at +home, but also the sums which otherwise the boy would pay to the +brothels. By this argument I do not mean that I favor keeping young +people financially dependent upon their parents. My own son is working +his own way through college, and I should be glad to see every young man +doing the same. All that I am saying is that if parents are going to +support their children while they are getting an education, they might +just as well support them married as single, instead of penalizing +matrimony by making all allowances cease at that point. + +I know a certain ardent feminist, who is all for late marriage for +women, and abhors my ideas on this subject. She wants women to get a +chance to develop their personalities; whereas I want to sacrifice them +to the frantic exigencies of the male animal! Young things of seventeen +and eighteen have no idea what they are, or what they want from life; +the mating impulse is a blind frenzy in them, and they must be taught to +control it, just as they are taught not to kill when they are angry! + +In the first place, I point out that young ladies in colleges and in +ballrooms give a lot of time and thought to sex, even though they do not +call it by that inelegant term. I very much question whether, if we +should apply our wisdom to the task of getting our young people happily +mated before we sent them off to college, we should not get a lot more +serious study out of them than we now do, with all their "fussing" and +flirting and dancing. + +Second, I am willing to make heroic moral efforts, where I see any +chance of adequate results, but I have examined the facts, and +definitely made up my mind that it is not worth while, in our present +stage of culture, to preach to the mass of men the doctrine that they +should abstain from sex experience until they are twenty-five or thirty +years of age. You may storm at them, but they only laugh at you; you may +pass laws, and try to put them in jail, but you only provide a harvest +for blackmailers and grafters. As to sacrificing the girl, my answer is +simply that I believe in love; and in this I think the girl will agree +with me, if you will let her! I have never heard any qualified person +maintain that it hurts a girl to respond to love at the age of seventeen +or eighteen; nor do I think that it hurts a boy, provided that he is +taught the virtues of moderation and self-restraint. Without these, it +will hurt him to eat; but that is no argument for starving him. As for +the question of his maturity and power to judge, we are able at present +to keep him from marrying anybody, so I think we might reasonably hope +to keep him from marrying a wanton or a slut. Certainly we might find +somebody better than the peroxide blonde he now picks up in front of the +moving picture palace. + +The question, at what ages we shall advise our young couple to have +children, is a separate one, depending upon many circumstances. First, +of course, they should not have any until they are able financially to +maintain them. As to the age at which it is physically advisable, that +is a question to be settled by physicians and physiologists. I myself +had the idea that the proper age would be when the woman had attained +her full stature; but my friend Dr. William J. Robinson sends me some +statistics from the Johns Hopkins Hospital _Bulletin_, which startle me. +This publication for January, 1922, gives the results in five hundred +childbirths, in which the mother's age was from twelve to sixteen years +inclusive. It appears that pregnancy and labor at these ages are no more +dangerous than in older women; but on the other hand, the duration of +the labor is actually shorter, and the size of the children is not +inferior. These facts are so contrary to the general impression that I +content myself with calling attention to them, and leave the commenting +to be done by feminists and others who oppose themselves to the idea of +early marriage. + + + + +CHAPTER XLI + +THE MARRIAGE CLUB + + (Discusses how parents and elders may help the young to avoid + unhappy marriages.) + + +I will make the assumption that you would like to have a trial of my +cure for prostitution. You would like to do something right here and +now, without waiting for the social revolution. Very well: I propose +that you shall find a few other parents of boys and girls who are in +revolt against our system of hidden vice, and that you will meet and +form a modern marriage club. Only you won't call it that, of course; you +will tactfully describe it as a literary society, or a social circle, or +an Epworth League. The parents who run it will know what it is for, just +as they do today; the only difference being that it will exist to +promote love matches instead of money matches. It happens that I am +myself a tactless sort of a person, not skillful at avoiding saying what +I mean. So, in this chapter, I shall content myself with setting forth +exactly what this marriage club will do, and leaving it to more clever +people to supply the necessary camouflage. + +This club will begin by correcting the most stupid of all our +educational blunders, the assumption of the necessary immaturity of the +young. Our young people nowadays have ten times as much chance to learn +and ten times as much stimulus to learn as we had; and it is a generally +safe assumption that they know much more than we think they do, and are +ready to learn every sensible and interesting thing. I am carrying on an +epistolary acquaintance with a little miss of twelve, who has read half +a dozen of my books--among the "worst" of them--and writes me letters of +grave appreciation. I have talked on Socialism to a thousand school +children, and had them question me for an hour, and heard just as worth +while questions as I have heard from an audience of bankers. Never in my +life have I talked about real things with children that I did not find +them proud to be treated seriously, and eager to show that they were +worthy of that honor. A great part of our foolishness with children is +due to the emptiness of our own heads. + +These parents will delegate one man and one woman to make a thorough +study of the sex education of the young. Of course, there is knowledge +about sex which has to be given to the very youngest child, and more and +more must be given as they grow older and ask more questions. But what I +have in mind here is that detailed and precise knowledge which must be +given to the young when they approach the period of puberty. At this age +of fourteen or fifteen the man will take each of the boys apart, and the +woman will take each of the girls, and will explain to them what they +need to know. This duty will not be trusted to parents, for parents have +an imbecile fear of talking straight to their children, and try to get +by with rubbish about bees and flowers. Let every child know that the +days of the hole-and-corner sex business is forever past, and that here +is an instructed person, who talks real American, and knows what he is +talking about, and will deal with facts, instead of with evasions. + +This club will help to educate the youngsters, and also to give them a +good time, developing both their minds and bodies, and learning to know +them thoroughly. When they are sixteen each one will have another talk, +this time about marriage and what it means; learning that it is not +merely flirtations and delicious thrills, but a business partnership, +and the deepest and best of all friendships. So when John finds that he +likes Mary best of all the girls he knows, this won't be a subject for +"kidding" and sly innuendo, and blushes and simpering on Mary's part, +but an occasion for decent and sensible talk about what each of them +really is, and what each thinks the other to be. If they think they are +in love, then there will be a council of the elder statesmen, to +consider that case, and what are the chances of happiness in that love. +This may sound forbidding, but it is exactly what is done at +present--only it is not done honestly and frankly, and therefore does +not carry proper weight with the young people. + +I am an opponent of long engagements, but I am also an opponent of no +engagements at all; I know no truer proverb than "Marry in haste and +repent at leisure." It would be my idea that a very young couple should +announce their engagement, and then wait six months, and be consulted +again about the matter, and have a chance to withdraw with no hard +feelings, if either party thought best. If they wished to go on, they +might be asked to wait another six months, if their elders felt very +certain there were reasons to doubt the wisdom of the match. + +There are, of course, people who, because of disease or physical defect, +should never be allowed to marry; and others who might marry, but should +not be allowed to have children. There should be laws providing for such +cases, requiring physical examination before marriage, and in extreme +cases providing for a simple and harmless surgical operation to prevent +the hopelessly unfit from passing on their defects to the future. But +dealing for the moment with normal young persons, members of our modern +marriage club, I should say that if, after they have listened to the +warning of their elders, and have waited for a decent interval to think +things over, they still remain of the opinion that they can make a +successful marriage, then it is up to the elders to wish them luck. I +have known of young couples who have refused to heed warnings, and +regretted it; but I have known of others who went ahead and had their +own way and proved they were right. There is a form of wisdom called +experience and there is another form called love. + +I hear the worldly and cynical rail at the blindness of "young love," +and I can see the truth in what they say; but also I can see the deeper +truth in the magic dreams of the young soul. Here is a youth who adores +a girl, and you know the girl, and it is comical to you, because you +know she is not any of the things the youth imagines. But who are you +that claim to know the last thing about a human soul? Look into your +own, and see how many different things you are! Look back, if you can, +to the time when you were young, and remember the visions and the hopes. +They have lost all reality to you now; but who can say how many of them +you might have made real if there had been one other person who believed +in them, and loved them, and would not give them up? + +I write this; and then I think of the other side--the fools that I have +known in love! The trusting women, marrying rotten men to reform them! +The pitiful people who think that fine phrases and sentimentality can +take the place of facts! I implore my young couples to sit down and +face the realities of their own natures, to decide what they are, and +what they want to be--and if there is going to be any change, let it be +made and tried out before marriage! I implore them to begin now to +control their desires by their reason and judgment; to begin, each of +them at the very outset, to carry their share of the burdens and do +their share of the hard work. I implore them to value independence and +self-reliance in the other, and never above all things to marry from +pity, which is a worthy emotion in its place, but has nothing to do with +sex, which should be an affair between equals, a matter of partnership +and not of parasitism. I think that, on the whole, the most dreadful +thing in love is the use of it for preying, for the securing of favors +and advantages of any sort, whether by men or by women. + + + + +CHAPTER XLII + +EDUCATION FOR MARRIAGE + + (Maintains that the art of love can be taught, and that we have the + right and the duty to teach it.) + + +I assume now that our young couple have definitely made up their minds, +and that the wedding day is near. They are therefore, both the man and +the woman, in position to receive information as to the physical aspects +of their future experience. This information is now for the most part +possessed only by pathologists--who impart it too late, after people +have blundered and wrecked their lives. The opponents of birth control +ask in horror if you would teach it to the young; I am now able to +answer just when I would teach it; I would teach it to these young +couples about to marry. I would make it by law compulsory for every +young couple to attend a school of marriage, and to learn, not merely +the regulation of conception, but the whole art of health and happiness +in sex. + +Perhaps the words, "a school of marriage," strike you as funny. When I +was young I remember that Pulitzer founded a school of journalism, and +all newspaper editors made merry--they knew that journalism could only +be learned in practice. But nowadays every city editor gives preference +to an applicant who has taken a college course in reporting; they have +learned that journalism can be taught, just like engineering and +accounting. In the same way I assert that marriage can be taught, and +the art of love, physical, mental, moral, and even financial; I think +that the day will come when enlightened parents would no more dream of +trusting their tender young daughter to a man who had not taken a course +in sex, than they would go up in an aeroplane with a pilot who knew +nothing about an engine. + +The knowledge which I possess upon the art of love I would be glad to +give you in this book; but unfortunately, if I were to do so, my book +would be suppressed, and I should be sent to jail. + +Some ten or twelve years ago I received a pitiful letter from a man who +was in state's prison in Delaware, charged with having imparted +information as to birth control. Under our amiable legal system, a +perfectly innocent man may be thrown into jail, and kept there for a +year or two before he is tried, and if he is without money or friends, +he might as well be buried alive. I went to Wilmington to call on the +United States attorney who had caused the indictment in this case, and +had an illuminating conversation with him. The official was anxious to +justify what he had done. He assured me that he was no bigot, but on the +contrary an extremely liberal man, a Unitarian, a Progressive, etc. "But +Mr. Sinclair," he said, "I assure you this prisoner is not a reformer or +humanitarian or anything like that. He is a depraved person. Look, here +is something we found in his trunk when we arrested him; a pamphlet, +explaining about sex relations. See this paragraph--it says that the +pleasure of intercourse is increased if it is prolonged." + +I looked at the pamphlet, and then I looked at the attorney. "Do you +think you have stated the matter quite fairly?" I asked. "Apparently the +purpose is to explain that the emotions of women are more slow to be +aroused than those of men, and that husbands failing to realize this, +often do not gratify their wives." + +"Well," said the other, "do you consider that a subject to be +discussed?" + +"Pardon me if I discuss it just a moment," I replied. "Do you happen to +know whether the statement is a fact?" + +"No, I don't. It may be, I suppose." + +"You have never investigated the matter?" + +The legal representative of our government was evidently annoyed by my +persistence. "I have not," he answered. + +"But then, suppose I were to tell you that thousands of homes have been +broken up for lack of just that bit of knowledge; that tens of thousands +of marriages are miserable for lack of it." + +"Surely, Mr. Sinclair, you exaggerate!" + +"Not at all. I could prove to you by one medical authority after +another, that if the desire of a woman in marriage is roused, and then +left ungratified, the result is nervous strain, and in the long run it +may be nervous breakdown." + +The above covers only one detail of the pamphlet in question. I read +some pages of it, and argued them out with the attorney. It was a +perfectly simple, straightforward exposition of facts about the +physiology of sex; and one of the reasons a man was to be sent to jail +for several years was--not that he had circulated such a pamphlet, not +that he had showed it to young people, but merely that he had it in his +trunk! + +There is an honest and very useful book, written by an English +physician, Dr. Marie C. Stopes, entitled "Married Love," published by +Dr. Wm. J. Robinson of New York, a specialist of authority and +integrity. The book deals with just such vital facts in a perfectly +dignified and straightforward manner; yet Dr. Robinson has been hounded +by the postoffice department because of it; he was convicted and forced +to pay a fine of $250, and the book was barred from the mails! + +I have so much else of importance to say in this Book of Love that it +would not be sensible to jeopardize it by causing a controversy with our +official censors of knowledge. Therefore I will merely say in general +terms that men and women differ, not merely as a sex, but as +individuals, and every marriage is a separate problem. Every couple has +to solve it in the intimacy of their love life, and for this there are +needed, first of all, gentleness on the part of the man, especially in +the first days of the honeymoon; and on the part of both at all times +consideration for the other's welfare and enjoyment, and above all, +frankness and honesty in talking out the subject. Reticence and shyness +may be virtues elsewhere, but they have no place in the intimacies of +the sex life; if men and women will only ask and answer frankly, they +can find out by experience what makes the other happy, and what causes +pain. + +We are dealing here with the most sacred intimacy of life, and one of +the most vital of life's problems. It is here, in the marriage bed, that +the divorce problem is to be settled, and likewise the problem of +prostitution; for it is when men and women fail to understand each +other, and to gratify each other, that one or the other turns cold and +indifferent, perhaps angry and hateful--and then we have passions +unsatisfied, and ranging the world, breaking up other homes and +spreading disease. So I would say to every young couple, seek knowledge +on this subject. Seek it without shame from others who have had a chance +to acquire it. Seek it also from nature, our wise old mother, who knows +so much about her children! + +Be natural; be simple and straightforward; and beware of fool notions +about sex. If you will look in the code of Hammurabi, which is over four +thousand years old, you will see the provision that a man who has +intercourse with a menstruating woman shall be killed. In Leviticus you +will read that both the man and the woman are to be cast out from their +people. You will find that most people still have some such notion, +which is without any basis whatever in health. And this is only one +illustration of many I might give of ignorance and superstition in the +sex life. I would give this as one very good rule to bear in mind; your +love life exists for the happiness and health of yourself and your +partner, and not for Hammurabi, nor Moses, nor Jehovah, nor your +mother-in-law, nor anybody else on the earth or above it. + +Great numbers of people believe that women are naturally less passionate +than men, and that marital happiness depends upon men's recognizing +this. Of course, there are defective individuals, both men and women; +but the normal woman is every bit as passionate as a man, if once she +has been taught; and if love is given its proper place in life, and +monkish notions not allowed to interfere, she will remain so all through +life, in spite of child-bearing or anything else. I say to married +couples that they should devote themselves to making and preserving +passionate gratification in love; because this is the bright jewel in +the crown of marriage, and if lovers solve this problem, they will find +other problems comparatively simple. + + + + +CHAPTER XLIII + +THE MONEY SIDE OF MARRIAGE + + (Deals with the practical side of the life partnership of + matrimony.) + + +So far we have discussed marriage as if it consisted only of love. But +it is manifest that this is not the case. Marriage is every-day +companionship, and also it is partnership in a complicated business. In +our school of marriage therefore we shall teach the rights and duties of +both partners to the contract, and shall face frankly the money side of +the enterprise. + +One of the first facts we must get clear is that the economics of +marriage are in most parts of the world still based upon the subjection +of woman, and are therefore incompatible with the claims of woman as a +partner and comrade. They will never be right until the social +revolution has abolished privilege, and the state has granted to every +woman a maternity endowment, with a mother's pension for every child +during the entire period of the rearing and education of that child. +Until this is done, the average woman must look to some man for the +support of her child, and that, by the automatic operation of economic +force, makes her subject to the whims of the man. What women have to do +is to agitate for a revision of the property laws of marriage; and +meantime to see that in every marriage there is an extra-legal +understanding, which grants to the woman the equality which laws and +conventions deny her. + +When I was a boy my mother had a woman friend who, if she wanted to go +downtown, would borrow a quarter from my mother. This woman's husband +was earning a generous salary, enough to enable him to buy the best +cigars by the box, and to keep a supply of liquors always on hand; but +he gave his wife no allowance, and if she wanted pocket money she had to +ask him for it, each time a separate favor. Yet this woman was keeping a +home, she was doing just as hard work and just as necessary work as the +man. Manifestly, this was a preposterous arrangement. If a woman is +going to be a home-maker for a husband, it is a simple, common-sense +proposition that the salary of the husband shall be divided into three +parts--first, the part which goes to the home, the benefit of which is +shared in common; second, the part which the husband has for his own +use; and third, the part which the wife has for hers. The second and +third parts should be equal, and the wife should have hers, not as a +favor, but as a right. If the two are making a homestead, or running a +farm, or building up a business, then half the proceeds should be the +woman's; and it should be legally in her name, and this as a matter of +course, as any other business contract. If the woman does not make a +home, but merely displays fine clothes at tea parties, that is of course +another matter. Just what she is to do is something that had better be +determined before marriage; and if a man wants a life-partner, to take +an interest in his work, or to have a useful work of her own, he had +better choose that kind of woman, and not merely one that has a pretty +face and a trim ankle. + +The business side of marriage is something that has to be talked out +from time to time; there have to be meetings of the board of directors, +and at these meetings there ought to be courtesy and kindness, but also +plain facts and common sense, and no shirking of issues. Love is such a +very precious thing that any man or woman ought to be willing to make +money sacrifices to preserve it. But on the other hand, it is a fact +that there are some people with whom you cannot be generous; the more +you give them, the more they take, and with such people the only safe +rule is exact justice. Let married couples decide exactly what +contribution each makes to the family life, and what share of money and +authority each is entitled to. + +I might spend several chapters discussing the various rocks on which I +have seen marriages go to wreck. For example, extravagance and worldly +show; clothes for women. In Paris is a "demi-monde," a world of brutal +lust combined with riotous luxury. The women of this "half-world" are in +touch with the world of art and fashion, and when the rich costumers and +woman-decorators want what they call ideas, it is to these lust-women +they go. The fashions they design are always depraved, of course; always +for the flaunting of sex, never for the suggestion of dignity and grave +intelligence. At several seasons of the year these lust-women are +decked out and paraded at the race-courses and other gathering places +of the rich, and their pictures are published in the papers and spread +over all the world. So forthwith it becomes necessary for your wife in +Oshkosh or Kalamazoo to throw away all the perfectly good clothes she +owns, and get a complete new outfit--because "they" are wearing +something different. Of course the costume-makers have seen that it is +extremely different, so as to make it impossible for your wife and +children to be happy in their last season's clothes. I have a winter +overcoat which I bought fourteen years ago, and as it is still as good +as new I expect to use it another fourteen years, which will mean that +it has cost me a dollar and a half per year. But think what it would +have cost me if I had considered it necessary each year to have an +overcoat cut as the keepers of French mistresses were cutting theirs! + +But then, suppose you put it up to your wife and daughters to wear +sensible clothes, and they do so, and then they observe that on the +street your eyes turn to follow the ladies in the latest disappearing +skirt? The point is, you perceive, that you yourself are partly to blame +for the fashions. They appeal to a dirty little imp you have in your own +heart, and when the decent women discover that, it makes them blazing +hot, and that is one of the ways you may wreck your domestic happiness +if you want to. Unless I am greatly mistaken, when the class war is all +over we are going to see in our world a sex war; but it is not going to +be between the men and the women, it is going to be between the mother +women and the mistress women, and the mistress women are going to have +their hides stripped off. + +Men wreck marriage because they are promiscuous; and women wreck it +because they are parasites. Woman has been for long centuries an +economic inferior, and she has the vices of the subject peoples and +tribes. Now there are some who want to keep these vices, while at the +same time claiming the new privileges which go with equality. Such a +woman picks out a man who is sensitive and chivalrous; who knows that +women suffer handicaps, pains of childbirth, physical weakness, and who +therefore feels impelled to bear more than his share of the burdens. She +makes him her slave; and by and by she gets a child, and then she has +him, because he is bowed down with awe and worship, he thinks that such +a miracle has never happened in the world before, and he spends the rest +of his life waiting on her whims and nursing her vanities. I note that +at the recent convention of the Woman's Party they demanded their rights +and agreed to surrender their privileges. There you have the final test +by which you may know that women really want to be free, and are +prepared to take the responsibilities of freedom. + + + + +CHAPTER XLIV + +THE DEFENSE OF MONOGAMY + + (Discusses the permanence of love, and why we should endeavor to + preserve it.) + + +So far in this discussion we have assumed that love means monogamous +love. We did so, for the reason that we could not consider every +question at once. But we have promised to deal with all the problems of +sex in the light of reason; and so we have now to take up the question, +what are the sanctions of monogamy, and why do we refuse sanction to +other kinds of love? + +First, let us set aside several reasons with which we have nothing to +do. For example, the reason of tradition. It is a fact that Anglo-Saxon +civilization has always refused legal recognition to non-monogamous +marriage. But then, Anglo-Saxon civilization has recognized war, and +slavery, and speculation, and private property in land, and many other +things which we presume to describe as crimes. If tradition cannot +justify itself to our reason, we shall choose martyrdom. + +Second, the religious reason. This is the one that most people give. It +is convenient, because it saves the need of thinking. Suffice it here to +say that we prefer to think. If we cannot justify monogamy by the facts +of life, we shall declare ourselves for polygamy. + +What are the scientific and rational reasons for monogamy? First among +them is venereal disease. This may seem like a vulgar reason, but no one +can deny that it is real. There was a time, apparently, when mankind did +not suffer from these plagues, and we hope there may be such a time +again. I shall not attempt to prescribe the marital customs for the +people of that happy age; I suspect that they will be able to take care +of themselves. Confining myself to my lifetime and yours, I say that the +aim of every sensible man and woman must be to confine sex relations to +the smallest possible limits. I know, of course, that there are +prophylactics, and the army and navy present statistics to show that +they succeed in a great proportion of cases. But if you are one of +those persons in whose case they don't succeed, you will find the +statistics a cold source of comfort to you. + +John and Mary go to the altar, or to the justice of the peace, and John +says: "With all my worldly goods I thee endow." But the formula is +incomplete; it ought to read: "And likewise with the fruits of my wild +oats." Marriage is a contract wherein each of the contracting parties +agrees to share whatever pathogenic bacteria the other party may have or +acquire; surely, therefore, the contract involves a right of each party +to have a say as to how many chances of infection the other shall incur. +John goes off on a business trip, and is lonesome, and meets an +agreeable widow, and figures to himself that there is very little chance +that so charming a person can be dangerous. But maybe Mary wouldn't +agree with his calculations; maybe Mary would not consider it a part of +the marriage bargain that she should take the diseases of the agreeable +widow. What commonly happens is that Mary is not consulted; John revises +the contract in secret, making it read that Mary shall take a chance at +the diseases of the widow. How can any thinking person deny that John +has thus committed an act of treason to Mary? + +I know that there are people who don't mind running such chances; that +is one reason why there are venereal diseases. All I can say is that the +sex-code set forth in this book is based upon the idea that to deliver +mankind from the venereal plague, we wish to confine the sex +relationship within the narrowest limits consistent with health, +happiness and spiritual development; and that to this end we take the +young and teach them chastity, and we marry them early while they are +clean, and then we call upon them to make the utmost effort to make a +success of that union, and to make it a matter of honor to keep the +marital faith. We do this with some hope of effectiveness, because we +have made our program consistent with the requirements of nature, the +genuine needs of love both physical and spiritual. + +The second argument for monogamy is the economic one. We have dreamed a +social order where every child will be guaranteed maintenance by the +state, and where women will be free from dependence on men. What will be +the love arrangements of men and women under this new order is another +problem which we leave for them to decide, in the certainty that they +will know more about it than we do. Meantime, we are for the present +under the private property regime, and have to love and marry and raise +our children accordingly. The children must have homes, and if they are +to be normal children, they must have both the male and female influence +in their lives; which means that their parents must be friends and +partners, not quarreling in secret. This argument, I know, is one of +expediency. I have adopted it, after watching a great number of people +try other than monogamous sex arrangements, and seeing their chances of +happiness and success wrecked by the pressure of economic forces. To +rebel against social compulsion may be heroism, and again it may be +merely bad judgment. For my part, the world's greatest evil is poverty, +the cause of crime, prostitution and war. I concentrate my energies upon +the abolishing of that evil, and I let other problems wait. + +The third reason is that monogamy is economical of human time and +thought. The business of finding and wooing a mate takes a lot of +energy, and adjustment after marriage takes more. To throw away the +results of this labor and do it all over again is certainly not common +sense. Of course, if you bake a cake and burn it, you have to get more +material and make another try; but that is a different matter from +baking a cake with the deliberate intention of throwing it away after a +bite or two. + +The advocates of varietism in love will here declare that we are begging +the question. We are assuming that love and the love chase are not +worthy in themselves, but merely means to some other end. Can it be that +love delights are the keenest and most intense that humans can +experience, and that all other purposes of life are contributory to +them? Certainly a great deal of art lends support to this idea, and many +poets have backed up their words by their deeds. As Coleridge phrased +it: + + "All thoughts, all passions, all delights, + Whatever stirs this mortal frame, + All are but ministers of Love + And feed his sacred flame." + +This is a question not to be played with. Experimenting in love is +costly, and millions have wrecked their lives by it. The sex urge in us +is imperious and cruel; it wants nothing less than the whole of us, +body, mind and spirit, and ofttimes it behaves like the genii in the +bottle--it gets out, and not all the powers in the universe can get it +back. I have talked with many men about sex and heard them say that it +presents itself to them as an unmitigated torment, something they would +give everything they own to be free of. And these, mind you, not men +living in monasteries, trying to repress their natural impulses, but men +of the world, who have lived freely, seeking pleasure and taking it as +it came. The primrose path of dalliance did not lead them to peace, and +the pursuit of variety in love brought them only monotony. + +I stop and think of one after another of these sex-ridden people, and I +cannot think of one whom I would envy. I know one who in a frenzy of +unhappiness seized a razor and castrated himself. I think of another, a +certain classmate in college whom I once stopped in a conversation, +remarking: "Did you ever realize what a state you have got your mind +into? Everything means sex to you. Every phrase you hear, every idea +that is suggested--you try to make some sort of pun, to connect it +somehow or other with sex." The man thought and said, "I guess that's +true." The idea had never occurred to him before; he had just gone on +letting his instincts have their way with him, without ever putting his +reason upon the matter. + +That was a crude kind of sex; but I think of another man, an idealist +and champion of human liberty. One of the forms of liberty he maintained +was the right to love as many women as he pleased, and although he was a +married man, one hardly ever saw him that he was not courting some young +girl. As a result, his mental powers declined, and he did little but +talk about ideas. I do not know anyone today who respects him--except a +few people who live the same sort of life. The thought of him brings to +my mind a sentence of Nietzsche--a man who surely stood for freedom of +personality: "I pity the lovers who have nothing higher than their +love." + +A question like this can be decided only by the experience of the race. +Some will make love the end and aim of life, and others will make it the +means to other ends, and we shall see which kind of people achieve the +best results, which kind are the most useful, the most dignified, the +most original and vital. I have seen a great many young people try the +experiment of "free love," and I have seen some get enough of it and +quit; I could name among these half a dozen of our younger novelists. I +know others who are still in it--and I watch their lives and find them +to be restless, jealous, egotistical and idle. My defense of monogamy is +based upon the fact that I have never known any happy or successful +"free lovers." Of course, I know some noble and sincere people who do +not believe in the marriage contract, and refuse to be bound by law; but +these people are as monogamous as I am, even more tightly bound by honor +than if they were duly married. + +It seems to be in the very nature of true and sincere love to imagine +permanence, to desire it and to pledge it. If you aren't that much in +love, you aren't really in love at all, and you had better content +yourself with strolling together and chatting together and dining +together and playing music together. So many pleasant ways there are in +which men and women can enjoy each other's company without entering upon +the sacred intimacy of sex! You can learn to take sex lightly, of +course, but if you do so, you reduce by so much the chances that true +and deep love will ever come to you; for true and deep love requires +some patience, some reverence, some tending at a shrine. The animals +mate quickly and get it over with; but the great discoveries about love, +and the possibilities of the human soul in love, have come because men +and women have been willing to make sacrifices for it, to take it +seriously--and more especially to take seriously the beloved person, the +rights and needs and virtues of that person. From the lives of such we +learn that love is nature's device for taking us out of ourselves, and +making us truly social creatures. + +Early in my life as a writer I undertook to answer Gertrude Atherton, in +her glorification of the sex-corruptions of capitalist society. She +indicted American literature for its "bourgeois" qualities--among these +the fact that American authors had a prejudice in favor of living with +their own wives. Mrs. Atherton set forth the joys of sex promiscuity as +they are understood by European artists, and I ventured in replying to +remark that "one woman can be more to a man than a dozen can possibly +be." That sounds like a paradox, but it is really a profound truth, and +the person who does not understand it has missed the best there is in +the sex relation. There is a limit to the things of the body, but to +those of the mind and spirit there is no limit, and so there is no +reason why true love should ever fall prey to boredom and satiety. + + + + +CHAPTER XLV + +THE PROBLEM OF JEALOUSY + + (Discusses the question, to what extent one person may hold another + to the pledge of love.) + + +Once upon a time I knew an Anarchist shoemaker, the same who had me sent +to jail for playing tennis on Sunday, as I have narrated in "The Brass +Check." I remember arguing with him concerning his ideas of sex, which +were of the freest. I can hear the very tones of his voice as he put the +great unanswerable question: "What are you going to do about the problem +of jealousy?" And I had no response at hand; for jealousy is truly a +most cruel and devastating and unlovely emotion; and yet, how can you +escape it, if you are going to preserve monogamy? + +The Anarchist shoemaker's solution was to break down all the prejudices +against sexual promiscuity. Free and unlimited license was every +person's right, and for any other person to interfere was enslavement, +for any other person to criticize was superstition. But the power of +superstition is strong in the world, and the shoemaker found men +resentful of his teachings, and disposed to confiscate the rights of +their wives and daughters. Hence the shoemaker's disapproval of +jealousy. + +Other men, less purely physiological in their attitude to sex, have +wrestled with this same problem of jealousy. H. G. Wells has a novel, +"In the Days of the Comet," in which he portrays two men, both nobly and +truly in love with the same woman. One in a passion of jealousy is about +to murder the other, when a great social transformation is magically +brought about, and the would-be murderer wakes up to universal love, and +the two men nobly and lovingly share the same woman. Shelley also +dreamed this dream, inviting two women to share him. I have known others +who tried it, but never permanently. I do not say that it never has +succeeded, or that it never can succeed. In this book I am renouncing +the future--I am trying to give practical advice to people, for the +conduct of their lives here and now, and my advice on this point is +that polygamous and polyandrous experiments in modern capitalist society +cost more than they are worth. + +I once knew a certain high school teacher, who believed religiously in +every kind of freedom. When she married, she and her husband, an artist, +made a vow against jealousy; but as it worked out, this vow meant that +the wife had a steady job and took care of the husband, while he loafed +and loved other women. When finally she grew tired of it, he accused her +of being jealous; also, she had brought it down to the matter of money! +I know another woman, an Anarchist, widely known as a lecturer on sex +freedom. She laid down the general principle of unlimited personal +freedom for all, and she tried to live up to her faith. She entered into +a "free union" with a certain man, and when she discovered that he was +making love to another woman, in the presence of a friend of mine she +threw a vase of flowers at his head. You see, her general principles had +clashed with another general principle, to the effect that a person who +feels deep and strong love inevitably desires that love to endure, and +cannot but suffer to see it preyed upon and destroyed. + +Let us first consider the question, just what are the true and proper +implications of monogamous love? The Roman Catholic church advocates +"monogamy," and understands thereby that a man and woman pledge +themselves "till death do us part," and if either of them cancels this +arrangement it is adultery and mortal sin. I hope that none of my +readers understands by "monogamy" any such system of spiritual +strangulation. My own idea is rather what some churchman has +sarcastically described by the term "progressive polygamy." I believe +that a man and woman should pledge their faith in love, and should keep +that faith, and endeavor with all their best energies to make a success +of it; they should strive each to understand the other's needs, and +unselfishly to fulfill them, within the limits of fair play. But if, +after such an effort has been truly made, it becomes clear that the +union does not mean health and happiness for one of the parties, that +party has a right to withdraw from it, and for any government or church +or other power to deny that right is both folly and cruelty. + +Now, on the basis of this definition of monogamy--or, if you prefer, of +progressive polygamy--we are in position to say what we think about +jealousy. If two people pledge their faith, and one breaks it, and the +other complains, we do not call that jealousy, but just common decency. +Neither do we call it jealousy if one expects the other to avoid the +appearance of guilt; for love is a serious thing, not to be played with, +and I think that a person who truly loves will do everything possible to +make clear to the beloved that he is keeping and means to keep the +plighted faith. + +You may say that I am using words arbitrarily, in endeavoring thus to +distinguish between justifiable and unjustifiable jealousy, and calling +the former by some other name. It does not make much difference about +words, provided I make clear my meaning. I could point out a whole +string of words which have good meanings and bad meanings, and cannot be +discussed without preliminary explanations and distinctions; religion, +for example, and morality, and aristocracy, and justice, to name only a +few. Most people's thinking about marriage and love has been made like +soup in a cheap restaurant, by dumping in all kinds of scraps and +notions from such opposite poles of human thought as Christian monkery +and Renaissance license, absurdly called "romance." So before you can do +any thinking about a problem like jealousy, you have to agree to use the +word to mean something definite, whether good or bad. + +We shall take jealousy as a "bad" word, and use it to mean the setting +up, by a man or woman, of some claim to the love of another person, +which claim cannot be justified in the court of reason and fair play. +This includes, in the first place, all claims based upon a courtship, +not ratified by marriage. It is to the interest of society and the race +that men and women should be free to investigate persons of the other +sex, and to experiment with the affections before pledges of marriage +are made. If sensible customs of love and just laws of marriage were +made, there would be no excuse for a woman's giving herself to a man +before marriage; she should be taught not to do it, and then if she does +it, the risk is her own, and the disgusting perversion of venality and +greed known as the "breach of promise suit" should be unknown in our +law. The young should be taught that it is the other person's right to +change his mind and withdraw at any time before marriage; whatever pains +and pangs this may cause must be borne in silence. + +The second kind of jealousy is that which seeks to keep in the marriage +bond a person who is not happy in it and has asked to be released. The +law sanctions this kind of cowardly selfishness, which manifests itself +every day on the front pages of our newspapers--a spectacle of monstrous +and loathsome passions unleashed and even glorified. Husbands set the +bloodhounds of the law after wives who have fled with some other man, +and send the man to a cell, and drag the woman back to a loveless home. +Wives engage private detectives, and trail their husbands to some "love +nest," and then ensue long public wrangles, with washing of filthy +linen, and the matter is settled by a "separation." The virtuous wife, +who may have driven the man away by neglect or vanity or stupidity, is +granted a share of his earnings for the balance of her life; and two +more people are added to the millions who are denied sexual happiness +under the law, and are thereby impelled to live as law violators. + +For this there is only one remedy conceivable. We have banned +cannibalism and slavery and piracy and duelling, and we must ban one +more ancient and cruel form of human oppression, the effort to hold +people in the bonds of sex by any other power save that of love. I am +aware that the reactionaries who read this book will take this sentence +out of its context and quote it to prove that I am a "free lover." I +shall be sorry to have that done, but even so, I was not willing to live +in slavery myself, and I am not willing to advocate it for others. I am +aware that there are degenerate and defective individuals, and that we +have to make special provision for them, as I shall presently set forth; +but the average, normal human being must be free to decide what is love +for him, and what is happiness for him. Every person in the world will +have to deny himself the right to demand love where love is not freely +given, and all lovers in the world will have to hold themselves ready to +let the loved one go if and when the loved one demands it. I am aware +that this is a hard saying, and a hard duty, but it is one that life +lays upon us, and one that there is no escaping. + + + + +CHAPTER XLVI + +THE PROBLEM OF DIVORCE + + (Defends divorce as a protection to monogamous love, and one of the + means of preventing infidelity and prostitution.) + + +You will hear sermons and read newspaper editorials about the "divorce +evil," and you will find that to the preacher or editor this "evil" +consists of the fact that more and more people are refusing to stay +unhappily married. It does not interest these moralizers if the +statistics show that it is women who are getting most of the divorces, +and that the meaning of the phenomenon is that women are refusing to +continue living with drunken and dissolute men. To the clergy, the +breaking of a marriage is an evil _per se_, and regardless of +circumstances. They know this because God has told them so, and in the +name of God they seek to keep people tied in sex unions which have come +to mean loathing instead of love. + +Now, I will assert it as a mathematical certainty that a considerable +percentage of marriages must fail. It is essential to progress that +human beings should grow, both mentally and spiritually, and manifestly +they cannot all grow in the same way. If they grow differently, must +they not sometimes lose the power to make each other happy in the +marital bonds? Who does not know the man who masters life and becomes a +vital force, while his wife remains dull and empty? If such a man +changes wives, the world in general denounces him as a selfish beast; +but the world does not know nor does it care about those thousands of +men who, not caring to be branded as selfish beasts, fulfill the needs +of their lives by keeping mistresses in secret. + +I knew a certain country school teacher, one of the most narrowly +conventional young women imaginable, who was engaged to a middle-aged +business man. He went to New York on a business trip, and stayed a +couple of months, and wrote her that he had met some Anarchists, and had +discovered that all he had read about them in the newspapers was false, +and that they were the true and pure idealists to whom the rest of his +life must be devoted. The young lady was horrified; nor was she any +happier when she came to New York and met her fiance's new friends. She +ought in common sense to have broken the engagement; but she was in +love, and she married, as many another fool woman does, with the idea of +"reforming" the man. She failed, and was utterly and unspeakably +wretched. + +I know another man, a conservative capitalist of narrow and aggressive +temper, whose wife turned into an ardent Bolshevik. The man thinks that +all Bolsheviks should be shut up in jail for life, while the wife is +equally certain that all jails should be razed to the ground and all +Bolsheviks placed in control of the government. These two people have +got to a point where they cannot sit down to the breakfast table without +flying into a quarrel. I know another case of a modern scientist, an +agnostic, whose wife, a half-educated, sentimental woman, took to +dabbling in mysticism, and drove him wild by setting up an image of +Buddha in her bedroom, and consorting with "swamis" in long yellow +robes. I know another whose wife turned into an ultra-pious Catholic, +and turned over the care of his domestic life to a priest. Is it not +obvious that the only possible solution of such problems lies in +divorce? Unless, indeed, we are all of us going to turn over the care of +our domestic lives to the priests! + +Our grandfathers and grandmothers believed one thing, and believed the +same thing when they were seventy as when they were twenty; so it was +possible for them to dwell in domestic security and permanence till +death did them part. But we are learning to change our minds; and +whether what we believe is better or worse than what our ancestors +believed, at least it is different. Also we are coming to take what we +believe with more seriousness; the intellectual life means more and more +to us, and it becomes harder and harder for us to find sexual and +domestic happiness with a partner who does not share our convictions, +but, on the contrary, may be contributing to the campaign funds of the +opposition party. + +I do not mean by this that people should get a divorce as soon as they +find they differ about some intellectual idea; on the contrary, I have +advocated that they should do everything possible to understand and to +tolerate each other. But it is a fact that intellectual convictions are +the raw material out of which characters and lives are made, and it is +inevitable that some characters and lives that fit quite well at twenty +should fit very badly at thirty or forty. When we refuse divorce under +such circumstances we are not fostering marriage, as we fondly imagine; +we are really fostering adultery. It is a fact that not one person in +ten who is held by legal or social force in an unhappy sex union will +refrain from seeking satisfaction outside; and because these outside +satisfactions are disgraceful, and in some cases criminal, they seldom +have any permanence. Therefore it follows that "strict" divorce laws, +such as the clerical propaganda urges upon us, are in reality laws for +the promotion of fornication and prostitution. + +There is a short story by Edith Wharton, in which the "divorce evil" is +exhibited to us in its naked horror; the story called "The Other Two," +in the volume "The Descent of Man." A society woman has been divorced +twice and married three times, and by an ingenious set of circumstances +the woman and all three of the men are brought into the same +drawing-room at the same time. Just imagine, if you can, such an +excruciating situation: a woman, her husband, and two men who used to be +her husbands, all compelled to meet together and think of something to +say! I cite this story because it is a perfect illustration of the +extent to which the "divorce problem" is a problem of our lack of sense. +Mrs. Wharton will, I fear, consider me a very vulgar person if I assert +that there is absolutely no reason whatever why any of those four people +in her story should have had a moment's discomfort of mind, except that +they thought there was. There is absolutely nothing to prevent a man and +woman who used to be married from meeting socially and being decent to +each other, or to prevent two men from being decent to each other under +such circumstances. I would not say that they should choose to be +intimate friends--though even that may be possible occasionally. + +I know, because I have seen it happen. In Holland I met a certain +eminent novelist and poet, a great and lovable man. I visited his home, +and met his wife and two little children, and saw a man and woman living +in domestic happiness. The man had also two grown sons, and after a few +days he remarked that he would like me to meet the mother of these young +men. We went for a walk of a mile or so, and met a lady who lived in a +small house by herself, and who received us with a friendly welcome and +talked with us for a couple of hours about music and books and art. This +lady had been the writer's wife for ten years or so, and there had been +a terrible uproar when they voluntarily parted. But they had refused to +pay attention to this uproar; they understood why they did not wish to +remain husband and wife any longer, but they did not consider it +necessary to quarrel about it, nor even to break off the friendship +which their common interests made possible. The two women in the case +were not intimate, I gathered, but they frequently met at the homes of +others, and found no difficulty in being friendly. I suggest to Mrs. +Wharton that this story is at least as interesting as the one she has +told; but I fear she will not care to write it, because apparently she +considers it necessary that people who are well bred and refined should +be the helpless victims of destructive manias. + + + + +CHAPTER XLVII + +THE RESTRICTION OF DIVORCE + + (Discusses the circumstances under which society has the right to + forbid divorce, or to impose limitations upon it.) + + +We have quoted the old maxim, "Marry in haste and repent at leisure," +and we suggested that parents and guardians should have the right to ask +the young to wait before marriage, and make certain of the state of +their hearts. We have now the same advice to give concerning divorce; +the same claim to enter on behalf of society--that it has and should +assert the right to ask people to delay and think carefully before +breaking up a marriage. + +What interest has society in the restriction of divorce? What affair is +it of any other person if I choose to get a divorce and marry a new wife +once a month? There are many reasons, not in any way based upon +religious superstition or conventional prejudice. In the first place, +there are or may be children, and society should try to preserve for +every child a home with a father and a mother in it. Second, there are +property rights, of which every marriage is a tangle, and the settlement +of which the law should always oversee. Third, there is the question of +venereal disease, which society has an unquestionable right to keep +down, by every reasonable restriction upon sexual promiscuity. And +finally, there is the respect which all men and women owe to love. It +seems to me that society has the same right to protect love against +extreme outrage, as it has to forbid indecent exposure of the person on +the street. + +There is in successful operation in Switzerland a wise and sane divorce +law, based upon common sense and not upon superstition. A couple wish to +break their marriage, and they go before a judge, and in private +session, as to a friendly adviser, they tell their troubles. He gives +them advice about their disagreement, and sends them away for three +months to think it over. At the end of three months, if they still +desire a divorce, they meet with him again. If he still thinks there is +a chance of reconciliation, he has the right to require them to wait +another three months. But if at the end of this second period they are +still convinced that the case is hopeless, and that they should part, +the judge is required to grant the divorce. You may note that this is +exactly what I have suggested concerning young couples who become +engaged. In both cases, the parties directly interested have the right +to decide their own fate, but the rest of the world requires them to +think carefully about it, and to listen to counsel. Except for grave +offenses, such as adultery, insanity, crime or venereal disease, I do +not think that anyone should receive a divorce in less than six months, +nor do I think that any personal right is contravened by the imposing of +such a delay. + +Next, what are we going to say to the right, or the claim to the right, +on the part of a man or woman, to be married once a year throughout a +lifetime? In order to illustrate this problem, I will tell you about a +certain man known to me. In his early life he spent a couple of years in +a lunatic asylum. He lays claim to extraordinary spiritual gifts, and +uses the language of the highest idealism known. He is a man of culture +and good family, and thus exerts a peculiar charm upon young women of +refinement and sensitiveness. To my knowledge he was three times married +in six years, and each time he deserted the woman, and forced her to +divorce him, and to take care of herself, and in one case of a child. In +addition, he had begotten one child out of marriage, and left the mother +and child to starve. For ten years or so I used to see him about once in +six months, and invariably he had a new woman, a young girl of fine +character, who had been ensnared by him, and was in the agonizing +process of discovering his moral and mental derangement. Yet there was +absolutely nothing in the law to place restraint upon this man; he could +wander from state to state, or to the other side of the world, preying +upon lovely young girls wherever he went. + +This particular man happens to call himself a "radical"; but I could +tell you of similar men in the highest social circles, or in the +political world, the theatrical world, the "sporting" world; they are in +every rank of life, and are just as definitely and certainly menaces to +human welfare and progress as pirates on the high seas or highwaymen on +the road. Nor are they confined to the males; the world is full of women +who use their sex charms for predatory purposes, and some of them are +far too clever for any law that you or I can contrive at present. But I +think we might begin by refusing to let any man or woman have more than +two divorces in one lifetime, in any state or part of the world. If any +man or woman tries three times to find happiness in love, and fails each +time, we have a right to assume that the fault must lie with that +person, and not with the three partners. + +I think we may go further yet; having made wise laws of love and +marriage, taking into consideration all human needs, we have a right to +require that men and women shall obey the laws. At present the great +mass of the public has sympathy for the law-breaker; just as, in old +days, the peasants could not help admiring the outlaw who resisted +unjust land laws and robbed the rich, or as today, under the capitalist +regime, we can not withhold our sympathy from political prisoners, even +though they have committed acts of violence which we deplore. But when +we have made sex laws that we know are just and sensible--then we shall +consider that we have the right to restrain sex criminals, and in +extreme cases we shall avail ourselves of the skill of science to +perform a surgical operation which will render him unable in future to +prey upon the love needs of people who are placed at his mercy by their +best qualities, their unselfishness and lack of suspicion. + +We clear out foul-smelling weeds from our garden, because we wish to +raise beautiful flowers and useful herbs therein. There lives in +California a student of plant life, who has shown us what we can do, not +by magic or by superhuman efforts, but simply by loving plants, by +watching them ceaselessly, understanding their ways, and guiding their +sex-life to our own purposes. We can perform what to our ignorant +ancestors would have seemed to be miracles; we can actually make all +sorts of new plants, which will continue to breed their own kind, and +survive forever if we give them proper care. In other words, Luther +Burbank has shown us that we can "change plant nature." + +There flash back upon my memory all those dull, weary, sick human +creatures, who have repeated to me that dull, weary, sick old formula, +"You cannot change human nature." I do not think I am indulging either +in religious superstition or in blind optimism, but am speaking +precisely, in saying that whenever human beings get ready to apply +experimental science to themselves, they can change human nature just as +they now change plant nature. By putting human bodies together in love, +we make new bodies of children more beautiful than any who have yet +romped on the earth; and in the same way, by putting minds and souls +together, we can make new kinds of minds and souls, different from those +we have previously known, and greater than either the man-soul or the +woman-soul alone. + +Also, by that magic which is the law of mind and soul life, each new +creation can be multiplied to infinity, and shared by all other minds +and souls that live in the present or may live in the future. We have +shown elsewhere how genius multiplies to infinity the joy and power of +life by means of the arts; and one of the greatest of the arts is the +art of love. Consider the great lovers, the true lovers, of history--how +they have enriched the lives of us all. It does not make any difference +whether these men and women lived in the flesh, or in the brain of a +poet--we learn alike from Dante and Beatrice, from Abelard and Heloise, +from Robert and Elizabeth Browning, from Tristan and Isolde, from Romeo +and Juliet, what is the depth and the splendor of this passion which +lies hidden within us, and how it may enrich and vivify and glorify all +life. + + + + +PART FOUR + +THE BOOK OF SOCIETY + + + + +CHAPTER XLVIII + +THE EGO AND THE WORLD + + (Discusses the beginning of consciousness, in the infant and in + primitive man, and the problem of its adjustment to life.) + + +We have now to consider the relationship of man to his fellows, with +whom he lives in social groups. Upon this problem floods of light have +been thrown by the new science of psycho-analysis. I will try to give, +briefly and in simple language, an idea of these discoveries. + +One of the laws of biology is that every individual, in his development, +reproduces the history of the race; so that impulses and mental states +of a child reveal to us what our far-off ancestors loved and feared. The +same thing is discovered to be true of neurotics, people who have failed +in adjusting themselves to civilized life, and have gone back, in some +or all of their mental traits, to infantile states. If we analyze the +unconscious minds of "nervous patients," and compare them with what we +find in the minds of infants, and in savages, we discover the same +dreams, the same longings and the same fears. + +The mental life of man begins in the womb. We cannot observe that life +directly, but we know that it is there, because there cannot be organic +life without mind to direct it, and just as there is an unconscious mind +that regulates the bodily processes in adults, so in the embryo there +must be an unconscious mind to direct the flow of blood, the building of +bones, muscle, eyes and brain. The mental life of that unborn creature +is of course purely egotistical; it knows nothing outside itself, and it +finds this universe an agreeable place--everything being supplied to it, +promptly and perfectly, without effort of its own. + +But suddenly it gets its first shock; pain begins, and severe +discomfort, and the creature is shoved out into a cold world, yelling in +protest against the unsought change. And from that moment on, the +new-born infant labors to adjust itself to an entirely new set of +conditions. Discomforts trouble it, and it cries. Quickly it learns that +these cries are answered, and satisfaction of its needs is furnished. +Somehow, magically, things appear; warm and dry covering, a trickle of +delicious hot milk into its mouth. At first the infant mind has no idea +how all this happens; but gradually it comes to realize objects outside +itself, and it forms the idea that these objects exist to serve its +wants. Later on it learns that there are particular sounds which attach +to particular objects, and cause them to function. The sound "Mama," for +example, produces a goddess clothed in beauty and power, performing +miracles. So the infant mind arrives at the "period of magic gestures" +and the "period of magic words"; corresponding to a certain type of myth +and belief which we find in every race and tribe of human being that now +exists or ever has existed on earth. All these stories about magic +wishes and magic rings and magic spells of a thousand sorts; and nowhere +on earth a child which does not listen greedily to such fancies! The +reason is simply that the child has passed through this stage of mental +life, and so recently that the feelings are close to the surface of his +consciousness. + +But gradually the infant makes the painful discovery that not everything +in existence can be got to serve him; there are forces which are proof +against his magic spells; there are some which are hostile, and these +the infant learns to regard with hatred and fear. Sometimes hatred and +fear are strangely mixed with admiration and love. For example, there is +a powerful being known as "father," who is sometimes good and useful, +but at other times takes the attention of the supremely useful "mother," +the source of food and warmth and life. So "father" is hated, and in +fancy he is wished out of the way--which to the infant is the same thing +as killing. Out of this grows a whole universe of fascinating mental +life, which Freud calls by the name "the [OE]dipus complex"--after the +legend of the Greek hero who murdered his father and committed incest +with his mother, and then, when he discovered what he had done, put out +his own eyes. There is a mass of legends, old as human thought, +repeating this story; we cannot be sure whether they have grown out of +the greeds and jealousies of this early wish-life of the infant, or +whether they had their base in the fact that there was a stage in human +progress in which the father really was killed off by the sons. + +This latter idea is discussed by Freud, in his book, "Totem and Taboo." +It appears that primitive man lived in hordes, which were dominated by +one old male, who kept all the women to himself, and either killed the +young males, or drove them out to shift for themselves; so the young men +would combine and murder their father. The forming of human society, of +marriage and the family, depended upon one factor, the decision of the +young victors to live and let live. The only way they could do this was +to agree not to quarrel over the women of their own group, but to seek +other women from other groups. This may account for what is known as +"exogamy," an almost universal marriage custom of primitive man, whereby +a man named Jones is barred by frightful taboos from the women named +Jones, but is permitted relations with all the women named Smith. + +To return to our infant: he is in the midst of a painful process of +adjusting himself to the outside world; discovering that sometimes all +his magic words and gestures fail, his wishes no longer come true. There +are beings outside him, with wills of their own, and power to enforce +them; he has to learn to get along with these beings, and give up his +pleasures to theirs. These processes which go on in the infant soul, the +hopes and the terrors, the griefs and the angers, are of the profoundest +significance for the later adult life. For nothing gets out of the mind +that has once got into it; the infantile cravings which are repressed +and forgotten stay in the unconscious, and work there, and strive still +for expression. The conscious mind will not tolerate them, but they +escape in the form of fairy-tales and stories, of dreams and delusions, +slips of the tongue, and many other mental events which it is +fascinating to examine. Also, if we are weakened by ill health or +nervous strain, these infantile wishes may take the form of "neuroses," +and fully grown people may take to stammering, or become impotent, or +hysterical, or even insane, because of failures of adjustment to life +that happened when they were a year or two old. These things are known, +not merely as a matter of theory, but because, as soon as by analysis +these infant secrets are brought into consciousness and adjusted there, +the trouble instantly ceases. + +So it appears that the whole process of human life, from the very hour +of birth, consists of the correct adjustment of men and women in +relation to their fellows. Not merely is man a social being, but all the +prehuman ancestors of men, for ages upon geologic ages, have been +social beings; they have lived in groups, and their survival has +depended upon their success in fitting themselves snugly into group +relationships. Failure to make correct adjustments means punishment by +the group, or by enemies outside the group; if the failure is serious +enough, it means death. We may assert that the task of understanding +one's fellow men, and making one's self understood by them, is the most +important task that confronts every individual. + +And if we look about the world at present, the most superficial of us +cannot fail to realize that the task is far from being correctly +performed. So many people unhappy, so many striving for what they cannot +get! So many having to be locked behind bars, like savage beasts, +because they demand something which the world is resolved not to let +them have! So many having to be killed, by rifles and machine-guns, by +high explosive shells and poison gas--because they misunderstood the +social facts about them, and thought they could fulfill some wishes +which the rest of mankind wanted them to repress! As I read the +psycho-analyst's picture of the newly born infant with its primitive +ego, its magic cries and magic gestures, I cannot be sure how much of it +is sober science and how much is mordant irony--a sketch of the mental +states of the men and women I see about me--whole classes of men and +women, yes, even whole nations! + +The effort of the following chapters will be to interpret to men and +women the world which they have made, and to which they are trying to +adjust themselves. More especially we shall try to show how, by better +adjustments, men may change both themselves and the world, and make both +into something less cruel and less painful, more serene and more certain +and more free. + + + + +CHAPTER XLVIX + +COMPETITION AND CO-OPERATION + + (Discusses the relation of the adult to society, and the part which + selfishness and unselfishness play in the development of social + life.) + + +Pondering the subject of this chapter, I went for a stroll in the +country, and seating myself in a lonely place, became lost in thought; +when suddenly my eye was caught by something moving. On the bare, hot, +gray sand lay a creature that I could see when it moved and could not +see when it was still, for it was exactly the color of the ground, and +fitted the ground tightly, being flat, and having its edges scalloped so +that they mingled with the dust. It was a lizard, covered with heavy +scales, and with sharp horns to make it unattractive eating. At the +slightest motion from me it vanished into a heap of stones, so quickly +that my eye could scarcely follow it. + +This creature, you perceive, is in its actions and its very form an +expression of terror; terror of devouring enemies, of jackals that +pounce and hawks that swoop, and also of the hot desert air that seeks +to dry out its few precious drops of moisture. Practically all the +energies of this creature are concentrated upon the securing of its own +individual survival. To be sure, it will mate, but the process will be +quick, and the eggs will be left for the sun to hatch out, and the baby +lizards will shift for themselves--that is to say, they will be +incarnations of terror from the moment they open their eyes to the +light. + +The jackal seeks to pounce upon the lizard, and so inspires terror in +the lizard; but when you watch the jackal you find that it exhibits +terror toward more powerful foes. You find that the hawk, which swoops +upon the lizard, is equally quick to swoop away when it comes upon a man +with a gun. This preying and being preyed upon, this mixture of cruelty +and terror, is a conspicuous fact of nature; if you go into any orthodox +school or college in America today, you will be taught that it is +nature's most fundamental law, and governs all living things. If you +should take a course in political economy under a respectable +professor, you would find him explaining that such cruelty-terror +applies equally in human affairs; it is the basis of all economic +science, and the effort to escape from it is like the effort to lift +yourself by your boot-straps. + +The professor calls this cruelty-terror by the name "competition"; and +he creates for his own purposes an abstract being whom he names "the +economic man," a creature who acts according to this law, and exists +under these conditions. One of the professor's formulas is the so-called +"Malthusian law," that population presses always upon the limits of +subsistence. Another is "the law of diminishing returns of agriculture," +that you can get only so much product out of a certain piece of land, no +matter how much labor and capital you put into it. Another is Ricardo's +"iron law of wages," that wages cannot rise above the cost of living. +Another is embodied in the formula of Adam Smith, that "Competition is +the life of trade." The professor enunciates these "laws," coldly and +impersonally, as becomes the scientist; but if you go into the world of +business, you find them set forth cynically, in scores of maxims and +witticisms: "Dog eat dog," "the devil take the hindmost," "business is +business," "do others or they will do you." + +Evidently, however, there is something in man which rebels against these +"natural" laws. In our present society man has set aside six days in the +week in which to live under them, and one day in the week in which to +preach an entirely different and contradictory code--that of Christian +ethics, which bids you "love your neighbor," and "do unto others as you +would they should do unto you." Between these Sunday teachings and the +week-day teachings there is eternal conflict, and one who takes pleasure +in ridiculing his fellow men can find endless opportunity here. The +Sunday preachers are forbidden to interfere with the affairs of the +other six days; that is called "dragging politics into the pulpit." On +the other hand, incredible as it may seem, there are professors of the +week-day doctrine who call themselves Christians, and believe in the +Sunday doctrine, too. They manage this by putting the Sunday doctrine +off into a future world; that is, we are to pounce upon one another and +devour one another under the "iron laws" of economics so long as we live +on earth, but in the next world we shall play on golden harps and have +nothing to do but love one another. If anybody is so foolish as to apply +the Sermon on the Mount to present-day affairs, we regard him as a +harmless crank; if he persists, and sets out to teach others, we call +him a Communist or a Pacifist, and put him in jail for ten or twenty +years. + +In the Book of the Mind, I have referred to Kropotkin's "Mutual Aid as a +Factor in Evolution," which I regard as one of the epoch-making books of +our time. Kropotkin clearly proves that competition is not the only law +of nature, it is everywhere modified by co-operation, and in the great +majority of cases co-operation plays a larger part in the relations of +living creatures than competition. There is no creature in existence +which is entirely selfish; in the nature of the case such a creature +could not exist--save in the imaginations of teachers of special +privilege. If a species is to survive, some portion of the energies of +the individual must go into reproduction; and steadily, as life +advances, we find the amount of this sacrifice increasing. The higher +the type of the creature, the longer is the period of infancy, and the +greater the sacrifice of the parent for the young. Likewise, most +creatures make the discovery that by staying together in herds or +groups, and learning to co-operate instead of competing among +themselves, they increase their chances of survival. You find birds that +live in flocks, and other birds, like hawks and owls and eagles, that +are solitary; and you find the co-operating birds a thousand times as +numerous--that is to say, a thousand times as successful in the struggle +for survival. You find that all man's brain power has been a social +product; the supremacy he has won over nature has depended upon one +thing and one alone--the fact that he has managed to become different +from the "economic man," that product of the imagination of the +defenders of privilege. + +It is evident that both competition and co-operation are necessary to +every individual, and the health of the individual and of the race lies +in the proper combination of the two. If a creature were wholly +unselfish--if it made no effort to look after its own individual +welfare--it would be exterminated before it had a chance to reproduce. +If, on the other hand, it cannot learn to co-operate, its progeny stand +less chance of survival against creatures which have learned this +important lesson. We have a nation of a 110,000,000 people, who have +learned to co-operate to a certain limited extent. Some of us realize +how vastly the happiness of these millions might be increased by a +further extension of co-operation; but we find ourselves opposed by the +professors of privilege--and we wish that these gentlemen would go out +and join the lizards of the desert sands or the sharks of the sea, +creatures which really practice the system of "laissez faire" which the +professors teach. + +The plain truth is that we cannot make a formula out of either +competition or co-operation. We cannot settle any problem of economics, +of business or legislation, by proclaiming, for example, that +"Competition is the life of trade." Competition may just as well turn +out to be the death of trade; it depends entirely upon the kind of +competition, and the stage of trade development to which it is applied. +In the early eighteenth century, when that formula of Adam Smith was +written, competition was observed to keep down prices and provide +stimulus to enterprise, and so to further abundant production. But the +time came when the machinery for producing goods was in excess, not +merely of the needs of the country, but of the available foreign +markets, and then suddenly the large-scale manufacturers made the +discovery that competition was the death of trade to them. They +proceeded, as a matter of practical common sense, and without consulting +their college professors, to abolish competition by forming trusts. We +passed laws forbidding them to do this, but they simply refused to obey +the laws. In the United States they have made good their refusal for +thirty-five years, and in the end have secured the blessing of the +Supreme Court upon their course. + +So now we have co-operation in large-scale production and marketing. It +is known by various names, "pools," "syndicates," "price-fixing," +"gentlemen's agreements." It is a blessing for those who co-operate, but +it proves to be the death of those who labor, and also of those who +consume, and we see these also compelled to combine, forming labor +unions and consumers' societies. Each side to the quarrel insists that +the other side is committing a crime in refusing to compete, and our +whole social life is rent with dissensions over this issue. Manifestly, +we need to clear our minds of dead doctrines; to think out clearly just +what we mean by competition, and what by co-operation, and what is the +proper balance between the two. + +I have been at pains in this book to provide a basis for the deciding of +such questions. It is a practical problem, the fostering of human life +and the furthering of its development. We cannot lay down any fixed +rule; we have to study the facts of each case separately. We shall say, +this kind of competition is right, because it helps to protect human +life and to develop its powers. We shall say, this other kind of +competition is wrong because it has the opposite effect. We shall say, +perhaps, that some kind was right fifty years ago, or even ten years +ago, because it then had certain effects; but meantime some factor has +changed, and it is now having a different effect, and therefore ought to +be abolished. + +There has never been any kind of human competition which men did not +judge and modify in that way; there is no field of human activity in +which ethical codes do not condemn certain practices as unfair. The +average Englishman considers it proper that two men who get into a +dispute shall pull off their coats, and settle the question at issue by +pummeling each other's noses. But let one of these men strike his +opponent in the groin, or let him kick his shins, and instantly there +will be a howl of execration. Likewise, an Anglo-Saxon man who fights +with the fists has a loathing for a Sicilian or Greek or other +Mediterranean man who will pull a knife. That kind of competition is +barred among our breeds; and also the kind which consists of using +poisons, or of starting slanders against your opponent. + +If you look back through history, you find many forms of competition +which were once eminently respectable, but now have been outlawed. There +was a time, for example, when the distinction we draw between piracy and +sea-war was wholly unknown. The ships of the Vikings would go out and +raid the ships and seaports of other peoples, and carry off booty and +captives, and the men who did that were sung as heroes of the nation. +The British sea-captains of the time of Queen Elizabeth--Drake, +Frobisher, and the rest of them--are portrayed in our school books as +valiant and hardy men, and the British colonies were built on the basis +of their activities; yet, according to the sea laws in force today, they +were pirates. We regard a cannibal race with abhorrence; yet there was a +time when all the vigorous races of men were cannibals, and the habit of +eating your enemies in battle may well have given an advantage to the +races which practiced it. + +On the other hand, you find sentimental people who reject all +competition on principle, and would like to abolish every trace of it +from society, and especially from education. But stop and consider for a +moment what that would mean. Would you abolish, for example, the +competition of love, the right of a man to win the girl he wants? You +could not do it, of course; but if you could, you would abolish one of +the principal methods by which our race has been improved. Of course, +what you really want is, not to abolish competition in love, but to +raise it to a higher form. There is an old saying, "All's fair in love +and war," but no one ever meant that. You would not admit that a man +might compete in love by threatening to kill the girl if she preferred a +rival. You would not admit that he might compete by poisoning the other +man. You would not admit that he might compete by telling falsehoods +about the other man. On the other hand, if you are sensible, you admit +that he has a right to compete by making his character known to the +girl, and if the other man is a rascal, by telling the girl that. + +Would you abolish the competition of art, the effort of men to produce +work more beautiful and inspiring than has ever been known before? Would +you abolish the effort of scientists to overthrow theories which have +hitherto been accepted? Obviously not. You make these forms of +competition seem better by calling them "emulation," but you do not in +the least modify the fact that they involve the right of one person to +outdo other persons, to supplant them and take away something from them, +whether it be property or position or love or fame or power. In that +sense, competition is indeed the law of life, and you might as well +reconcile yourself to it, and learn to play your part with spirit and +good humor. + +Also, you might as well train your children to it. You will find you +cannot develop their powers to the fullest without competition; in fact, +you will be forced to go back and utilize forms of competition which are +now out of date among adults. I have told in the Book of the Body how I +myself tried for ten years or more to live without physical competition, +and discovered that I could not; I have had to take up some form of +sport, and hundreds of thousands of other men have had the same +experience. What is sport? It is a deliberate going back, under +carefully devised rules, to the savage struggles of our ancestors. The +very essence of real sport is that the contestants shall, within the +rules laid down, compete with each other to the limit of their powers. +With what contempt would a player of tennis or baseball or whist regard +the proposition that his opponent should be merciful to him, and let him +win now and then! Obviously, these things have no place in the game, and +to be a "good sport" is to conform to the rules, and take with enjoyment +whatever issue of the struggle may come. + +But then again, suppose you are competing with a child; obviously, the +conditions are different. You no longer play the best you can, you let +the child win a part of the time; but you do not let the child know +this, or it would spoil the fun for the child. You pretend to try as +hard as you know how, and you cry out in grief when you are beaten, and +the child crows with delight. And yet, that does not keep you from +loving the child, or the child from loving you. + +The purpose of this elaborate exposition is to make clear the very vital +point that a certain set of social acts may be right under some +conditions, and desperately wrong under other conditions. They may be +right in play, and not in serious things; they may be right in youth, +and not in maturity; they may be right at one period of the world's +development, while at another period they are destructive of social +existence. If, therefore, we wish to know what are right and wrong +actions in the affairs of men, if we wish to judge any particular law or +political platform or program of business readjustment, the first thing +we have to do is to acquire a mass of facts concerning the society to +which the law or platform or program, is to be applied. We need to ask +ourselves, exactly what will be the effect of that change, applied in +that particular way at that particular time. In order to decide +accurately, we need to know the previous stages through which that +society has passed, the forces which have been operating in it, and the +ways in which they have worked. + +But also we must realize that the lessons of history cannot ever be +accepted blindly. The "principles of the founders" apply to us only in +modified form; for the world in which we live today is different from +any world which has ever been before, and the world tomorrow will be +different yet. We are the makers of it, and the masters of it, and what +it will be depends to some extent upon our choice. In fact, that is the +most important lesson of all for us to learn; the final purpose of all +our thought about the world is to enable us to make it a happier and a +better world for ourselves and our posterity to live in. + + + + +CHAPTER L + +ARISTOCRACY AND DEMOCRACY + + (Discusses the idea of superior classes and races, and whether + there is a natural basis for such a doctrine.) + + +In the letters of Thomas Jefferson is found the following passage: + +"All eyes are open or opening to the rights of man. The general spread +of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable +truth that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their +backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them +legitimately, by the grace of God." + +This, which Jefferson, over a hundred years ago, described as a +"palpable truth," is still a long way from prevailing in the world. We +are trying in this book not to take anything for granted, so we do not +assume this truth, but investigate it; and we begin by admitting that +there are many facts which seem to contradict it, and which make it more +difficult of proof than Jefferson realized. It is not enough to point +out the lack of saddles on the backs, and of boots and spurs on the feet +of newly born infants; for the fact is that men are not exploited +because of saddles, nor is the exploiting accomplished by means of boots +and spurs. It is done by means of gold and steel, banks and credit +systems, railroads, machine-guns and battleships. And while it is not +true that certain races and classes are born with these things on them, +they are born to the possession of them, and the vast majority of +mankind are without them all their lives, and without the ability to use +them even if they had them. + +The doctrine that "all men are created equal," or that they ought to be +equal, we shall describe for convenience as the democratic doctrine. It +first came to general attention through Christianity, which proclaimed +the brotherhood of all mankind in a common fatherhood of God. But even +as taught by the Christians, the doctrine had startling limitations. It +was several centuries before a church council summoned the courage to +decide that women were human beings, and had souls; and today many +devout Christians are still uncertain whether Japanese and Chinese and +Filipinos and Negroes are human beings, and have souls. I have heard old +gentlemen in the South gravely maintain that the Negro is not a human +being at all, but a different species of animal. I have heard learned +men in the South set forth that the sutures in the Negro skull close at +some very early age, and thus make moral responsibility impossible for +the black race. And you will find the same ideas maintained, not merely +as to differences of race and color, but as to differences of economic +condition. You will find the average aristocratic Englishman quite +convinced that the "lower orders" are permanently inferior to himself, +and this though they are of the same Anglo-Saxon stock. + +For convenience I will refer to the doctrine that there is some natural +and irremovable inferiority of certain races or classes, as the +aristocratic doctrine. I will probably startle some of my readers by +making the admission that if there is any such natural or irremovable +inferiority, then a belief in political or economic equality is a +blunder. If there are certain classes or races which cannot think, or +cannot learn to think as well as other classes and races, those mentally +inferior classes and races will obey, and they will be made to obey, and +neither you nor I, nor all the preachers and agitators in the world, +will ever be able to arrange it otherwise. Suppose we could do it, we +should be committing a crime against life; we should be holding down the +race and aborting its best development. + +Is there any such natural and irremovable inferiority in human beings? +When we come to study the question we find it complicated by a different +phenomenon, that of racial immaturity, which we have to face frankly and +get clear in our minds. One of the most obvious facts of nature is that +of infancy and childhood. We have just pointed out that if you are +competing with a child, you do it in an entirely different way and under +an entirely different set of rules, and if you fail to do this, you are +unfair and even cruel to the child. And it is a fact of our world that +there are some races more backward in the scale of development than +other races. You may not like this fact, but it is silly to try to evade +it. People who live in savage huts and beat on tom-toms and fight with +bows and arrows and cannot count beyond a dozen--such people are not +the mental or moral equals of our highly civilized races, and to treat +them as equals, and compete with them on that basis, means simply to +exterminate them. And we should either exterminate them at once and be +done with it, or else make up our minds that they are in a childhood +stage of our race, and that we have to guide them and teach them as we +do our children. + +There is no more useful person than the wise and kind teacher. But +suppose we saw some one pretending to be a teacher to our children, +while in reality enslaving and exploiting them, or secretly robbing and +corrupting them--what would we say about that kind of teacher? The name +of that teacher is capitalist commercialism, and his profession is known +as "the white man's burden"; his abuse of power is the cause of our +present racial wars and revolts of subject peoples. A fair-minded man, +desirous of facing all the facts of life, hardly knows what stand to +take in such a controversy; that is, hardly knows from which cause the +colored races suffer more--the white man's exploitation, or their own +native immaturity. + +To say that certain races are in a childhood stage, and need instruction +and discipline, is an entirely different thing from saying they are +permanently inferior and incapable of self-government. Whether they are +permanently inferior is a problem for the man of science, to be +determined by psychological tests, continued possibly over more than one +generation. We have not as yet made a beginning; in fact, we have not +even acquired the scientific impartiality necessary to such an inquiry. + +In the meantime, all that we can do is to look about us and pick up +hints where we can. In places like Massachusetts, where Negroes are +allowed to go to college and are given a chance to show what they can +do, they have not ousted the white man, but many of them have certainly +won his respect, and one finds charming and cultured men among them, who +show no signs of prematurely closed up skulls. And one after another we +see the races which have been held down as being inferior, developing +leadership and organization and power of moral resistance. The Irish are +showing themselves today one of the most vigorous and high-spirited of +all races. The Hindus are developing a movement which in the long run +may prove more powerful than the white man's gold and steel. The +Egyptians, the Persians, the Filipinos, the Koreans, are all devising +ways to break the power of capitalist newspaper censorship. How sad that +the subject races of the world have to get their education through +hatred of their teachers, instead of through love! + +Of course, these rebel leaders are men who have absorbed the white man's +culture, at least in part; practically always they are of the younger +generation, which has been to the white man's schools. But this is the +very answer we have been seeking--as to whether the race is permanently +inferior, or merely immature and in need of training. It is not only +among the brown and black and yellow races that progress depends upon +the young generations; that is a universal fact of life. + +In the course of this argument we shall assume that the Christian or +democratic theory has the weight of probability on its side, and that +nature has not created any permanently and necessarily inferior race or +class. We shall assume that the heritage of culture is a common +heritage, open to all our species. We shall not go so far as the +statement which Jefferson wrote into the Declaration of Independence, +that "all men are created free and equal"; but we shall assert that they +are created "with certain inalienable rights," and that among these is +the right to maintain their lives and to strive for liberty and +happiness. Also, we shall say that there will never be peace or order in +the world until they have found liberty, and recognition of their right +to happiness. + + + + +CHAPTER LI + +RULING CLASSES + + (Deals with authority in human society, how it is obtained, and + what sanction it can claim.) + + +It is possible to conceive an order of nature in which all individuals +were born and developed exactly alike and with exactly equal powers. +Such is apparently the case with lower animals, for example the ants and +the bees. But among human beings there are great differences; some are +born idiots and some are born geniuses. Even supposing that we are able +to do away with blindness and idiocy, it is not likely that we can ever +make a race of uniform genius. There will always be some more capable +minds, who will discover new powers of life, and will compel the others +to learn from them. It is to the interest of the race that this learning +should be done as quickly as possible. In other words, the great problem +of society is how to recognize superior minds and put them in authority. + +We look back over history, and discover a few wise men, and many rulers; +but very, very rarely does it happen that the ruler is a wise man, or a +friend of wise men. Far more often we find the ruler occupied in +suppressing the wise man and his wisdom. There was a ruler who allowed +the mob to crucify Jesus, and another who ordered Socrates to drink the +hemlock, and another who tortured Galileo, and another who chopped off +the head of Sir Walter Raleigh--and so on through a long and tragic +chronicle. And even when the accident of a wise ruler occurs he is apt +to be surrounded by a class of parasites and corrupt officials who are +busy to thwart his will. + +The general run of history is this: some group seizes power by force, +and holds it by the same means, and seeks to augment and perpetuate it. +Those who win the power are frequently men of energy and practical +sense, and do fairly well as governors; but they are never able to hand +on their virtues, and their line becomes corrupted by sensuality and +self-indulgence, and the subject classes are plundered and driven to +revolt. Often the revolt fails, but in the course of time it succeeds, +and there is a new dynasty, or a new ruling class, sometimes a little +better than the old, sometimes worse. + +How shall one judge whether the new regime is better or worse? +Obviously, this is a most important question; it has to do, not merely +with history, but with our daily affairs, our voting. As one who has +read some tens of thousands of pages of history, and has pondered its +lessons with heart-sickness and despair, I lay down this general law by +which revolts and changes of power may be judged: If the change results +in the holding of power by a smaller number of people, it is a reaction; +but if the change results in distributing the power among a larger group +of the community, then that community has made a step in advance. + +I have seen a sketch of the history of some Central American +country--Guatemala, I think--which showed 130 revolutions in less than a +hundred years. Some rascal gets together a gang, and seizes the +government and plunders its revenue. When he has plundered too much, +some other rascal stirs up the people, and gets together another gang. +Such "revolutions" we regard as subjects for comic opera, and for the +Richard Harding Davis type of fiction; but we do not consider them as +having any relationship to progress. We describe them as "palace" +revolutions. + +But compare with this the various English revolutions. We write learned +histories about them, and describe England as "the Mother of +Parliaments." The reason for this is that when there was political +discontent in England, the protesting persons proceeded to organize +themselves, and to understand their trouble and to remedy it. They had +the brain power to do this; they maintained their right to do it, and +when by violence or threats of violence they forced the ruling class to +give way, they brought about a wider extension of liberty, a wider +distribution of power. Tennyson has pictured England as a state "where +freedom slowly broadens down from precedent to precedent." We today, +reading its history, are inclined to put a sarcastic emphasis on the +word "slowly"; but Tennyson would answer that it is better for a +community to move forward slowly than to move forward rapidly and then +move backward nearly as far. + +We have pointed out several times the important fact of biology that +change does not necessarily mean progress from any rational or moral +point of view. Degeneration is just as real a fact as progress, and it +does not at all follow that because things change they are changing for +the better. It is worth while to repeat this in discussing human +society, for it is just as true of governments and morals as of living +species. A nation may pile up wealth, and multiply a hundredfold the +machinery of wealth production, and only be increasing luxury and +wantonness and graft. A nation may change its governmental forms, its +laws and social conventions, and boast noisily of these changes in the +name of progress, while as a matter of fact it is following swiftly the +road to ruin which all the empires of history have traced. So far as I +can discover, there is one test, and only one, by which you can judge, +and that is the test already indicated: Is the actual, effective power +of the state wielded by a larger or a smaller percentage of the +population than before the change took place? + +You will note the words "actual, effective power." Nothing is more +familiar in human life than for forms to survive after the spirit which +created them is dead; and nothing is more familiar than the use of these +forms as masks to deceive the populace. There have been many times in +history when people have gone on voting, long after their votes ceased +to count for anything; there have been many times when people have gone +through the motions of freedom long after they have been slaves. Mexico +under Diaz had one of the most perfect of constitutions, and was in +reality one of the most perfect of despotisms; and we Americans are +sadly familiar with political democracies which do not work. + +Shall we, therefore, join the pessimists and say that history is a blind +struggle for useless power, and that the notion of progress is a +delusion? I do not think so; on the contrary, I think it is easily to be +demonstrated that there has been a steady increase in the amount of +knowledge possessed by the race, and in the spread of this knowledge +among the whole population. I think that through most of the period of +written history we can trace a real development in human society. I +think we can analyze the laws of this development, and explain its +methods; and I think this knowledge is precious to us, because it +enables us to accelerate the process and to make the end more certain. +This task, the analysis of social evolution, is the task we have next to +undertake. + + + + +CHAPTER LII + +THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION + + (Discusses the series of changes through which human society has + passed.) + + +We have now to consider, briefly, the history of man as a social being, +the groups he has formed, and the changes in his group systems. +Everything in life grows, and human societies are no exception to the +rule. They have undergone a long process of evolution, which we can +trace in detail, and which we find conforms exactly to the law laid down +by Herbert Spencer; a process whereby a number of single and similar +things become different parts of one complex thing. In the case of human +societies the units are men and women, and social evolution is a process +whereby a small and simple group, in which the individuals are +practically alike, grows into a large and complex group, in which the +individuals are widely different, and their relations one to another are +complicated and subtle. + +There are two powerful forces pressing upon human beings, and compelling +them to struggle and grow. The first of these forces is fear, the need +of protection against enemies; the second is hunger, the need of food +and the means of producing and storing food. The first causes the +individual to combine with his fellows and establish some form of +government, and this is the origin of political evolution. The second +causes him to accumulate wealth, and to combine industrially, and this +is the origin of economic evolution. Because the first force is a little +more urgent, we observe in the history of human society that evolution +in government precedes evolution in industry. + +I made this statement some twenty years ago, in an article in "Collier's +Weekly." I wrote to the effect that man's first care was to secure +himself against his enemies, and that when he had done this he set out +to secure his food supply. "Collier's" called upon the late Professor +Sumner of Yale University, a prize reactionary and Tory of the old +school, to answer me; and Professor Sumner made merry over my statement, +declaring that man sought for food long before he was safe from his +enemies. Some years later, when Sumner died, one of his admirers wrote +in the New York "Evening Post" that he had completely overwhelmed me, +and I had acknowledged my defeat by failing to reply--something which +struck me as very funny. It was, of course, possible that Sumner had +overwhelmed me, but to say that I had considered myself overwhelmed was +to attribute to me a degree of modesty of which I was wholly incapable. +As a matter of fact, I had had my usual experience with capitalist +magazines; "Collier's Weekly" had promised to publish my rejoinder to +Sumner, but failed to keep the promise, and finally, when I worried +them, they tucked the answer away in the back part of the paper, among +the advertisements of cigars and toilet soaps. + +Professor Sumner is gone, but he has left behind him an army of pupils, +and I will protect myself against them by phrasing my statement with +extreme care. I do not mean to say that man first secures himself +completely against his enemies, and then goes out to hunt for a meal. Of +course he has to eat while he is countering the moves of his enemies; he +has to eat while he is on the march to battle, or in flight from it. But +ask yourself this question: which would you choose, if you had to +choose--to go a couple of days with nothing to eat, or to have your +throat cut by bandits and your wife and children carried away into +slavery? Certainly you would do your fighting first, and meantime you +would scratch together any food you could. While you were devoting your +energies to putting down civil war, or to making a treaty with other +tribes, or to preparing for a military campaign, you would continue to +get food in the way your ancestors had got it; in other words, your +economic evolution would wait, while your political evolution proceeded. +But when you had succeeded in putting down your enemies, and had a long +period of peace before you, then you would plant some fields, and +domesticate some animals, or perhaps discover some new way of weaving +cloth--and so your industrial life would make progress. + +It is easy to see why Professor Sumner wished to confuse this issue. He +could not deny political evolution, because it had happened. He despised +and feared political democracy, but it was here, and he had to speak +politely to it, as to a tiger that had got into his house. But +industrial democracy was a thing that had not yet happened in the +world; it was only a hope and a prophecy, and therefore a prize old Tory +was free to ridicule it. I remember reading somewhere his statement--the +notion that democracy had anything to do with industry, or could in any +way be applied to industry, was a piece of silliness. So, of course, he +sought to demolish my idea that there was a process of evolution in +economic affairs, paralleling the process of political evolution which +had already culminated in democracy. + +Let us consider the process of political evolution, briefly and in its +broad outlines. Take any savage tribe; you find it composed of +individuals who are very much alike. Some are a little stronger than +others, a little more clever, more powerful in battle; but the +difference is slight, and when the tribe chooses someone to lead them, +they might as well choose one man as another. They all have a say in the +tribe councils, both men and women; their "rights" in the tribe are the +same. They are, of course, slaves to ignorance, to degrading +superstition and absurd taboos; but these things apply to everyone +alike, there is no privileged caste, no hereditary inequality. + +But little by little, as the tribe grows in numbers, and in power and +intelligence, as it comes to capture slaves in battle, and to unite with +other tribes, there comes to be an hereditary chieftain and a group of +his leading supporters, his courtiers and henchmen. When the society has +evolved into the stage which we call barbarism, there is a permanent +superior caste; there are hereditary priests, who have in their keeping +the favor of the gods; and there is a subject population of slaves. + +The society moves on into the feudal stage, in which the various grades +and classes are precisely marked off, each with its different functions, +its different privileges and rights and duties. The feudal +principalities and duchies war and struggle among themselves; they are +united by marriage or by conquest, and presently some stronger ruler +brings a great territory under his power, and we have what is called a +kingdom; a society still larger, still more complex in its organization, +and still more rigid in its class distinctions. Take France, under the +ancient regime, and compare a courtier or noble gentleman with a serf; +they are not only different before the law, they are different in the +language they use, in the clothes they wear, in the ideas they hold; +they are different even in their bodies, so that the gentleman regards +the serf as an inferior species of creature. + +The kings warred among themselves and emperors arose. The ultimate ideal +in Europe was a political society which should include the whole +continent, and this ideal was several times almost attained. But it is +the rule of history that wherever a large society is built upon the +basis of privilege and enslavement, the ruling classes prove morally and +intellectually unequal to the burden put upon them; they become +corrupted, and their rule becomes intolerable. This happened in Europe, +and there came political revolutions--first in England, which +accomplished it by gradual stages, and then in the French monarchy, and +quite recently in a dozen monarchies and empires, large and small. + +What precisely is this political revolution? Let us consider the case of +France, where the change was sudden, and the issues precisely drawn. +King Louis XIV had said, "I am the state." To a person of our time that +might seem like boasting, but it was merely an assertion of the existing +political fact. King Louis was the state by universal consent, and by +divine authority, as all men believed. The army was his army, the navy +was his navy, and wars, when he made them, were his wars. Everyone in +the state was his subject, and all the property of the state was his +personal, private property, to dispose of as he pleased. The government +officials carried out his will, and members of the nobility held the +land and ruled in his name. + +But now suddenly the people of France overthrew the king, and put him to +death, and drove the nobles into exile; they seized the power of the +French state, and proclaimed themselves equal citizens in the state, +with equal voices in its government and equal rights before the law. So +we call France a republic, and describe this form of society as +political democracy. It is the completion of the process of political +evolution, and you will see that it moves in a sort of spiral; having +completed a circle and got back where it was before, but upon a higher +plane. The citizens of a modern republic are equal before the law, just +as were the members of the savage tribe; but the political organization +is vastly larger, and infinitely more complicated, and every individual +lives his life upon a higher level, because he shares in the benefits of +this more highly organized and more powerful state. + + + + +CHAPTER LIII + +INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION + + (Examines the process of evolution in industry and the stage which + it has so far reached.) + + +And now let us consider the process of industrial evolution. We shall +find it to be exactly the same thing, reproducing the changes in another +field of activity. You may picture two gigantic waves sweeping over the +ocean. In some places the waves are far apart, and in other places they +are closer together; for a time they may mingle, and perhaps their bases +always mingle. It would be easy for a critic to point out how political +affairs play a leading part in industrial evolution, and vice versa; it +would be easy to argue that property rules the political state, or +again, that the main function of the political state is to protect +property. As I have said, man has to fight his enemies, and he has to +seek food, and often he has to do the two things at the same time; but +nevertheless, broadly speaking, we observe two great waves, sweeping +over human society, and most of the time these waves are clearly +separated and easily distinguished. + +Industry in a savage tribe is, like government, simple and uniform; all +the members of the tribe get their living in the same way. One may be a +little more expert as a fisherman, another as a gatherer of cocoanuts, +but the fisherman gathers cocoanuts and the cocoanut-gatherer fishes. In +the days of primitive communism there is little economic strife and +little change; but as slavery comes in, and the private property system, +there begins industrial war--the members of the tribe trade with one +another, and argue over prices, and gradually some get the better of +others, they accumulate slaves and goods, and later on they appropriate +the land to their private use. Of course, the men who do this are often +the rulers of the tribe, and so politics and industry are mixed; but +even assuming that the state never interfered, assuming that the +government allowed business affairs to work themselves out in their own +way, the tendency of competition is always to end in monopoly. The big +fish eat the little fish, the strong gain advantage over the weak, the +rich grow richer, and the poor grow relatively poorer. As the amount of +trading increases, and men specialize in the arts of bargaining, we see +again and again how money concentrates in the hands of a few. It does +this, even when the political state tries to prevent it; as, for +example, when the princes and dukes of the Middle Ages would torture the +Jewish money-lenders and take away their treasure, but the Jews never +failed to grow rich again. + +It is when political evolution has completed itself, and a republic has +been set up, that a free field is given to economic forces to work +themselves out to their logical end. We have seen this in the United +States, where we all started pretty much on the same economic level, and +where political tyranny has had little hold. Our civilization is a +civilization of the trader--the business man, as we call him; and we see +how big business absorbs little business, and grows constantly larger +and more powerful. We are familiar with what we call "graft," the use by +business men of the powers of government to get trade advantage for +themselves, and we have a school of old-time thinkers, calling +themselves "Jeffersonian Democrats," who insist that if only there had +never been any government favors, economic equality and democracy would +have endured forever in our country. But it is my opinion that +government has done far more to prevent monopoly and special privilege +in business than to favor it; and nevertheless, monopoly has grown. + +In other words, the tendency toward concentration in business, the +absorption of the small business by the big business, is an irresistible +natural process, which neither can be nor should be hindered. The +condition of competition, whether in politics or in industry, is never a +permanent one, and can never be made permanent; it is a struggle which +automatically brings itself to an end. Large-scale production and +distribution is more economical than small-scale, and big business has +irresistible advantages of credit and permanence over little business. +As we shall presently show, the blind and indiscriminate production of +goods under the competitive system leads to the glutting of markets and +to industrial crises. At such times the weaker concerns are weeded out +and the strong ones take their trade; and as a result, we have the +modern great corporation, the most powerful machine of production yet +devised by man, and which corresponds in every aspect to the monarchy in +political society. + +We are accustomed to speak of our "captains of industry," our "coal +kings," and "beef barons" and "lords of steel," and we think we are +using metaphors; but the universality of these metaphors points to a +fundamental truth in them. As a matter of fact, our modern captain of +industry fills in the economic world exactly the same functions as were +filled in ancient days by the head of a feudal state. He has won his +power in a similar struggle, and he holds it by similar methods. He +rules over an organization of human beings, arranged, economically +speaking, in grades and classes, with their authorities and privileges +and duties precisely determined, as under the "ancient regime." And just +as King Louis said, "I am the state," so Mr. Armour considers that he is +Armour & Co., and Mr. Morgan considers that he is the house of Morgan, +and that the business exists for him and is controlled by him under +divine authority. + +If I am correct in my analysis of the situation, this process of +industrial evolution is destined to complete itself, as in the case of +the political state. The subject populations of industry are becoming +more and more discontented with their servitude, more and more resentful +of that authority which compels them to labor while others reap the +benefit. They are organizing themselves, and preparing for a social +transformation which will parallel in every detail the revolution by +which our ancestors overthrew the authority of King George III over the +American colonies, and made inhabitants of those colonies no longer +subjects of a king, but free and equal citizens of a republic. I expect +to see a change throughout the world, which will take the great +instruments of production which we call corporations and trusts, out of +the hands of their present private owners, and make them the property, +either of the entire community, or of those who do the work in them. +This change is the "social revolution," and when it has completed +itself, we shall have in that society an Industrial Republic, a form of +business management which constitutes economic democracy. + +The history of the world's political revolutions has been written almost +exclusively by aristocratic or bourgeois historians; that is to say, by +men who, whatever their attitude toward political democracy, have no +conception of industrial democracy, and believe that industrial strife +and enslavement are the normal conditions of life. If, however, you will +read Kropotkin's "Great French Revolution," you will be interested to +discover how important a part was played in this revolution by economic +forces. Underneath the political discontent of the merchants and middle +classes lay a vast mass of social discontent of the peasants and +workers. It was the masses of the people who made the revolution, but it +was the middle classes who seized it and turned it to their own ends, +putting down attempts toward economic equality, and confining the +changes, so far as possible, to the political field. + +And everywhere throughout history, if you study revolutions, you find +that same thing happening. You find, for example, Martin Luther fighting +for the right to preach the word of God without consulting the Pope; but +when the peasants of Germany rose and sought to set themselves free from +feudal landlords, Luther turned against them, and called upon the +princes to shoot them down. "The ass needs to be beaten, and the +populace needs to be controlled with a strong hand." The landlords and +propertied classes of England were willing to restrict the power of the +king, and to give the vote to the educated and well-to-do; but from the +time of Jack Cade to our own they shoot down the poor. + +But meantime, the industrial process continues; the modern factory +system brings the workers together in larger and larger groups, and +teaches them the lesson of class consciousness. So the time of the +workers draws near. The first attempt in modern times to accomplish the +social revolution and set up industrial democracy was in the Paris +Commune. When the French empire collapsed, after the war with Germany in +1871, the workers of Paris seized control. They were massacred, some +50,000 of them, and the propertied classes of France established the +present bourgeois republic, which has now become the bulwark of reaction +throughout the Continent of Europe. + +Next came the Russian revolution of 1905, and this was an interesting +illustration of the relation between the two waves of social progress. +Russia was a backward country industrially, and according to theory not +at all prepared for the social revolution. But nowadays the thoughts of +men circulate all over the world, and the exiles from Russia had +absorbed Marxian ideas, and were not prepared to accept a purely +political freedom. So in 1905, after the Japanese war, when the people +rose and forced the Czar to grant a parliament, the extremists made an +effort to accomplish the social revolution at the same time. The +peasants began to demand the land, and the workers the factories; +whereupon the capitalists and middle classes, who wanted a parliament, +but did not want Socialism, went over to the side of reaction, and both +the political and social revolutions were crushed. + +But then came the great war, for which Russia with her incompetent +government and her undeveloped industry was unprepared. The strain of it +broke her down long before the other Allies, and in the universal +suffering and ruin the Russian people were again forced to rise. The +political revolution was accomplished, the Czar was imprisoned, and the +Douma reigned supreme. Middle class liberalism throughout the world gave +its blessings to this revolution, and hastened to welcome a new +political democracy to the society of nations. But then occurred what to +orthodox democratic opinion has been the most terrifying spectacle in +human history. The Russian people had been driven too far towards +starvation and despair; the masses had been too embittered, and they +rose again, overthrowing not only their Czar and their grand dukes, but +their capitalists and land-owners. For the first time in history the +social revolution established itself, and the workers were in control of +a great state. Ever since then we have seen exactly what we saw in +Europe from 1789 onward, when the first political republic was +established, and all the monarchies and empires of the world banded +themselves together to stamp it out. We have witnessed a campaign of +war, blockade, intrigue and propaganda against the Soviet government of +Russia, all pretending to be carried on in the name of the Russian +people, and for the purpose of saving them from suffering--but all +obviously based upon one consideration and one alone, the fear that an +effort at industrial self-government might possibly prove to be a +success. + +Whether or not the Soviets will prove permanent, no one can say. But +this much is certain; just as the French revolution sent a thrill around +the world, and planted in the hearts of the common people the wonderful +dream of freedom from kings and ruling classes, just so the Russian +revolution has brought to the working masses the dream of freedom from +masters and landlords. Everywhere in capitalist society this ferment is +working, and in one country after another we see the first pangs of the +new birth. Also we see capitalists and landlords, who once found +"democracy," "free speech" and "equality before the law" useful formulas +to break down the power of kings and aristocrats, now repudiating their +old-time beliefs, and going back to the frankest reaction. We see, in +our own "land of the free," the government refusing to reprint the +Declaration of Independence during the war, and arresting men for +quoting from it and circulating it; we even see the Department of +Justice refusing to allow people to reprint the Sermon on the Mount! + + + + +CHAPTER LIV + +THE CLASS STRUGGLE + + (Discusses history as a battle-ground between ruling and subject + classes, and the method and outcome of this struggle.) + + +There is a theory of social development, sometimes called the +materialistic interpretation of history, and sometimes the economic +interpretation of history. It is one of the contributions to our thought +which we owe to Karl Marx, and like all the rest of Marxian theory, it +is a subject of embittered controversy, not merely between Socialists +and orthodox economists, but between various schools of revolutionary +doctrine. For my part, I have never been a great hand for doctrine, +whether ancient or modern; I am not much more concerned with what Marx +taught than I am with what St. Paul taught, or what Martin Luther +taught. My advice is to look at life with your own eyes, and to state in +simple language the conclusions of your own thinking. + +Man is an eating animal; he has also been described as a tool-making +animal, and might be described as an ideal-making animal. There is a +tendency on the part of those who specialize in the making of ideals to +repudiate the eating and the tool-making sides of man; which accounts +for the quarrel between the Marxians and the moralists. All through +history you find new efforts of man to develop his emotional and +spiritual nature, and to escape from the humiliating limitations of the +flesh. These efforts have many of them been animated by desperate +sincerity, but none of them have changed the fundamental fact that man +is an eating animal, an animal insufficiently provided by nature against +cold, and with an intense repugnance to having streams of cold water run +down back of his neck. The religious teachers go out with empty purse, +and "take no thought for the morrow"; but the forces of nature press +insistently upon them, and little by little they make compromises, they +take to shelter while they are preaching, they consent to live in +houses, and even to own houses, and to keep a bank account. So they make +terms with the powers of this world, and the powers of this world, +which are subtle, and awake to their own interests, find ways to twist +the new doctrine to their ends. + +So the new religion becomes simply another form of the old hypocrisy; +and it comes to us as a breath of fresh air in a room full of corruption +when some one says, "Let us have done with aged shams and false +idealisms. Let us face the facts of life, and admit that man is a +physical animal, and cannot do any sane and constructive thinking until +he has food and shelter provided. Let us look at history with unblinking +eyes, and realize that food and shelter, the material means of life, are +what men have been seeking all through history, and will continue to +seek, until we put production and distribution upon a basis of justice, +instead of a basis of force." + +Such is, as simply as I can phrase it, the materialistic interpretation +of history. Put into its dress of scientific language it reads: the +dominant method of production and exchange in any society determines the +institutions and forms of that society. I do not think I exaggerate in +saying that this formula, applied with judgment and discrimination, is a +key to the understanding of human societies. + +Wherever man has moved into the stage of slavery and private property +there has been some group which has held power and sought to maintain +and increase it. This group has set the standards of behavior and belief +for the community, and if you wish to understand the government and +religion, the manners and morals, the philosophy and literature and art +of that community, the first thing you have to do is to understand the +dominant group and its methods of keeping itself on top. This statement +applies, not merely to those cultural forms which are established and +ordained by the ruling class; it applies equally well to the +revolutionary forms, the behavior and beliefs of those who oppose the +ruling class. For men do not revolt in a vacuum, they revolt against +certain conditions, and the form of their revolt is determined by the +conditions. Take, for example, primitive Christianity, which was +certainly an effort to be unworldly, if ever such an effort was made by +man. But you cannot understand anything about primitive Christianity +unless you see it as a new form of slave revolt against Roman +imperialism and capitalism. + +The theory of the class struggle is the master key to the bewilderments +and confusions of history. Always there is a dominant class, holding +the power of the state, and always there are subject classes; and sooner +or later the subject classes begin protesting and struggling for wider +rights. When they think they are strong enough, they attempt a revolt, +and sometimes they succeed. If they do, they write the histories of the +revolt, and their leaders become heroes and statesmen. If they fail, the +histories are written by their oppressors, and the rebels are portrayed +as criminals. + +One of the commonest of popular assumptions is that if the rebels have +justice on their side, they are bound to succeed in the long run; but +this is merely the sentimental nonsense that is made out of history. It +is perfectly possible for a just revolt to be crushed, and to be crushed +again and again; just as it is possible for a child which is ready to be +born to fail to be born, and to perish miserably. The fact that the +Huguenots had most of the virtue and industry and intelligence of France +did not keep them from being slaughtered by Catholic bigots, and +reaction riveted upon the French people for a couple of hundred years. +The fact that the Moors had most of the industry of Spain did not keep +them from being driven into exile by the Inquisition, and the +intellectual life of the Spanish people strangled for three hundred or +four hundred years. + +Some eight hundred years ago our ancestors in England brought a cruel +and despotic king to battle, and conquered him, and on the field of +Runnymede forced him to sign a grant of rights to Englishmen. That +document is known as Magna Carta, or the Great Charter, and everyone who +writes political history today recognizes it as one of the greatest of +man's achievements, the beginning of a process which we hope will bring +freedom and equality before the law to every human being on earth. + +And now we have come to the stage in our industrial affairs, when the +organized workers seek to bring the monarchs of industry into the +council chamber, and force them to sign a similar Great Charter, which +will grant freedom and self-government to the workers. Just as King John +was forced to admit that the power to tax and spend the public revenue +belonged to the people of England, and not to the ruler; just so the +workers will establish the principle that the finances of industry are a +public concern, that the books are to be opened, and prices fixed and +wages paid by the democratic vote of the citizens of industry. If that +change is accomplished, the historian of the future will recognize it +as another momentous step in progress; and he will heed the protests of +the lords of industry, that they are being deprived of their freedom to +do business, and of their sacred legal rights to their profits, as +little as he heeded the protests of King John against the "treason" and +"usurpation" and infringement of "divine right" by the rebellious +barons. + + + + +CHAPTER LV + +THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM + + (Shows how wealth is produced in modern society, and the effect of + this system upon the minds of the workers.) + + +In the beginning man got his living by hunting and fishing. Then he took +to keeping flocks and herds, and later by slow stages he settled down to +agriculture. With the introduction of slavery and the ownership of the +land by ruling classes, there came to be a subject class of workers, who +toiled on the land from dawn to dark, year in and year out, and got, if +they were fortunate, an existence for themselves and their families. +Whether these workers were called slaves or serfs or peasants, whether +their product was taken from them in the form of taxes by the king, or +of rent by the landlord, made no difference; the workers were bound to +the soil, like the beasts with which they lived in intimate contact. +They were drafted into armies, and made to fight for their lords and +masters; they suffered pestilence and famine, fire and slaughter; but +with infinite patience they would rebuild their huts, and dig and plant +again, whether for the old master or for a new one. + +In the early days these workers made their own crude tools and weapons; +but very early there must have been some who specialized in such arts, +and with the growth of towns and communications came a new kind of +labor, based upon a new system. Some enterprising man would buy slaves, +or hire labor, and obtain a supply of raw material, and manufacture +goods to be bartered or sold. He would pay his workers enough to draw +them from the land, and would sell the product for what he could get, +and the difference would be his profit. That was capitalism, and at +first it was a thing of no importance, and the men who engaged in it had +no social standing. But princes and lords needed weapons and supplies +for their armies, and the men who could furnish these things became more +and more necessary, and the states which encouraged them were the ones +which rose to power. Merchants and sea-traders became the intimates of +kings, and by the time of the Roman empire, capitalism was a great +world power, dominating the state, using the armies of the state for its +purposes. It went down with the rest of Roman civilization, but in the +Middle Ages it began once more to revive, and by the end of the +eighteenth century the merchants and money lenders of France, with their +retainers, the lawyers and journalists, were powerful enough to take the +control of society. + +Then, in the beginning of the nineteenth century, came the invention of +machinery and of the power process. Capitalism began to grow like a +young giant among pygmies. In the course of a century it has ousted all +other methods of production, and all other forms of social activity. A +hundred years ago the British House of Commons was a parliament of +landlords; today it is a Merchants' and Manufacturers' Association. Out +of the 707 members of the British House of Commons, 361 are members of +the "Federation of British Industries," the labor-smashing organization +of British "big business." And the same is true of every other +parliament and congress in the modern capitalist state. Practically all +the wealth of the world today is produced by the capitalist method, and +distributed under capitalist supervision, and therefore capitalist ideas +prevail in our society, to the practical exclusion of all other ideas. I +have shown in "The Profits of Religion" how these ideas dominate the +modern church, and in "The Brass Check" how they dominate the modern +press. I plan to write two books, to show how they dominate education +and literature. + +A hundred years ago an industry consisted of a half a dozen or a dozen +men, working under the personal supervision of an owner, and using crude +hand tools. Today it consists of a gigantic trust, owning and managing +scores and perhaps hundreds of mills and factories, each employing +thousands of workers. A corporation like the Steel Trust owns enough of +the sources of its raw material to give it practical monopoly; it owns a +fleet of vessels especially designed for ore-carrying; it owns its +private railroads, to deliver the ore to the mills. Through its system +of dummy directorates it has practical control of the main railroads +over which it distributes its products; also of banks and trust +companies and insurance companies, to gather the money of the public to +finance its undertakings. It owns huge office buildings, and vast +tracts of land upon which the homes of its workers are built. It has a +private army for the defense of its property--a complete army of +cavalry, infantry and artillery, including a large and highly efficient +secret service department, with a host of informers and spies. It has +newspapers for the purpose of propaganda, and it controls the government +of every village, town and city in which it has important interests. If +you will take the trouble to visit a "steel town," and make inquiries +among public officials, newspaper men, and others who are "on the +inside," you will discover that those in authority consider it necessary +and proper that "steel" should control, and are unable to conceive any +other condition of affairs. If you go to other parts of the country, +where other great industries are located, you find it taken for granted +that "copper" should control, or "lumber," or "coal," or "oil," or +whatever it may be. + +Under the system of large scale capitalism, labor is a commodity, bought +and sold in the market like any other commodity. Some years ago Congress +was requested to pass a law contradicting this fundamental fact of world +capitalism. Congress passed a law, very carefully worded so that no one +could be sure what it meant, and a few years later the Supreme Court +nullified the law. But all through this political and legal controversy +the status of labor remained exactly the same; there was a "labor +market," consisting of those members of the community who, in the +formula of Marx, had nothing but their labor power to sell. These +competed for recognition at the factory gates, and highly skilled +foremen selected those who offered the largest quantity of labor power +for the stated wage. + +So entirely impersonal is this process that there are great industries +in America in which ninety per cent of the common labor force is hired +and fired all over again in the course of a year. These men are put to +work in gangs, under a system which enables one picked man to set the +pace, and compel all the others to keep up with him, under penalty of +being discharged. This process is known as "speeding up," and its +purpose is to obtain from each worker the greatest quantity of energy in +exchange for his daily wage. In the steel industry men work twelve hours +a day for six days in the week, and then finish with a twenty-four-hour +day. If they do not work so long in other industries, it is because +experience has proven that the greatest quantity of energy can be +obtained from them in a shorter time. There are very few men who can +stand this pace for long. Those who are not crippled or killed in +accidents are broken down at forty, and all the great corporations +recognize this fact. Their foremen pick out the younger men, and +practically all concerns have an age rule, and never hire men above +forty or forty-five. + +I shall not in this book go into details concerning the fate of the +worker under the profit system. I have written two novels, "The Jungle" +and "King Coal," in which the facts are portrayed in detail, and it +seems the part of common sense to refer the reader to these text-books. +It will suffice here to set forth the main outlines of the situation. In +every capitalist country of the world the masses of the people are +herded into industries, in whose profits they have no share, and in +whose welfare they have no interest. They do not know the people for +whom they work; they have no human relationship, either with their work +or with their employers. They see the surplus of their product drawn off +to maintain a class of idlers, whose activities they know only through +the scandals of the divorce courts and the luxury-love of the moving +picture screen. They compete with one another for jobs, and bid down one +another's wages; and if they attempt to organize and end this +competition, their efforts are broken by newspaper propaganda and +policemen's clubs. At the same time they know that monopoly, open or +secret, prevails in the fixing of prices, and so they find the struggle +to "get ahead" a losing one. In America it used to be possible for the +young and energetic to "go West"; but now the wave of capitalism has +reached the Pacific coast and been thrown back, and there is no more +frontier. + +The man who works on the land has been through all the ages a solitary +man. He is better friends with his horse and his cow than with his +fellow humans. He is brutalized by incessant toil, he lives amid dirt +and the filth of animals, he is, in the words of Edwin Markham: + + "A thing that grieves not and that never hopes, + Stunted and stunned, a brother to the ox." + +He is a victim of natural forces which he does not understand, and +inevitably therefore he is superstitious. Being alone, he is helpless +against his masters, and only utter desperation drives him to revolt. + +But consider the capitalist system--how different the conditions of its +workers! Here they are gathered into city slums, and their wits are +sharpened by continual contact with their fellows. The printing press +makes cheap the spread of information, and the soap-box makes it even +cheaper. Any man with a grievance can shout aloud, and be sure of an +audience to listen, and he can get a great deal said before the company +watchman or the policeman can throttle him. Moreover, the modern worker +is not struggling with drought and tempest and hail; he does not see his +labors wiped out by volcanic eruption or lightning stroke; he is dealing +with machinery, something that he himself has made, and that he fully +understands. If a machine gets out of order, he does not fall down upon +his knees and pray to God to fix it. All the training of his life +teaches him the relationship of cause and effect, the adjustment of +means to ends. So the modern worker, as a necessary consequence of his +daily work, is practical, skeptical, and unsentimental in his +psychology. And what is more, he is making all the rest of society of +the same temperament. He is building roads out into the country, and +building machines to roll over them; he is running telephone lines and +sending newspapers and magazines and moving picture shows to the peasant +and the farmer; so the young peasants and farmers hunger for the city, +and they learn to fix machinery instead of praying to God. + +Such is the psychology of the modern working class; and the supreme +achievement of their sharpened wits is an understanding of the +capitalist process. As a matter of fact they did not make this discovery +for themselves; it was made for them by middle-class men, lawyers and +teachers and writers--Fourier, Owen, Marx, Lassalle. The modern doctrine +is called by various names: Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Bolshevism, +Syndicalism, Collectivism. Later on I shall define these various terms, +and point out the distinctions between them. For the moment I emphasize +the factor they all have in common, and which is fundamental: they wish +to break the power of class ownership and control of the instruments and +means of production; they wish to replace private capitalism by some +system under which the instruments and means of production are +collectively owned and operated; and they look to the non-owning class, +the proletarian, as the motive power by which this change is to be +compelled. I shall in future refer to this as the "social revolutionary" +doctrine; taking pains to explain that the word "revolutionary" is to be +divested of its popular meaning of physical violence. It is perfectly +conceivable that the change may be brought about peaceably, and I shall +try to show before long that in modern capitalist states the decision as +to whether it is brought about peaceably or by violence rests with the +present masters of industry. + + + + +CHAPTER LVI + +THE CAPITALIST PROCESS + + (How profits are made under the present industrial system and what + becomes of them.) + + +We have next to examine the structure of the capitalist order, basing +our argument on facts which are admitted by everyone, including the most +ardent defenders of the present system. + +All men have to have certain material things which we describe as goods. +As these goods do not produce themselves, it is necessary that some +should work. The workers must have tools; also they must have access to +the land and the sources of raw materials. These means of production are +owned by some individuals in the community, and this ownership gives +them power to direct the work of the rest. Those who own the land and +the natural sources of wealth we call capitalists, or business men, and +those who do not own these things, or whose share in them is +insignificant, are the proletariat, or working class. + +If you state to the average American that there is a capitalist class +and a proletariat in this country, he will point out that many who are +now members of the capitalist class were originally members of the +proletariat; they have worked hard and saved, and accumulated property. +But this is merely confusing the issue. The fact that some proletarians +turn into capitalists and some capitalists into proletarians is +important to the individuals concerned, but it does not alter the fact +that there are two classes, capitalist and proletarian. Consider, by way +of illustrating, a field with trees growing on it; we have earth, and we +have trees, and the distinction between them is unmistakable. The roots +of the trees go down into the earth, and take up portions of the earth +and turn it into tree. The leaves and the dead branches fall, and in the +course of time are turned once more to earth. There are all sorts of +stages between earth and tree, and between tree and earth; but you would +not therefore say that the word "earth" and the word "tree" are +misnomers. + +The working men go to the business man and apply for work. The business +man gives them work, and takes their product, and offers it in the +market at a price which allows him a profit above cost. If he can sell +at a profit, he repeats the process, and the worker has a job. If he +cannot sell at a profit, the worker is out of a job. Here and there may +be a benevolent business man who, rather than turn his workers out of a +job, will sell his goods at cost, or even for a short time at a loss; +but if he keeps the factory going simply for the benefit of his workers, +and with no expectation of ever making a profit, that is a form of +charity, and not the common system under which our business is now +carried on. + +So it appears that the worker is dependent for his wages upon the +ability of the business man to make a profit. The worker's life is +inextricably bound up with the profit of the capitalist--no profit for +the capitalist, no life for the worker. The capitalist, going out to +look for markets for his goods, is seeking, not merely profit for +himself, but life for his workers. + +Now, the business man pays a certain percentage of his total receipts +for labor, another percentage for raw materials, another percentage for +his overhead charges, and the rest is profit in various forms, rent to +the landlord, interest to the bondholder, dividends to the stockholder. +All this total sum goes to human individuals, and each has thus a +certain amount of money to spend. They pay it over to other individuals +for goods or services, and so the money keeps circulating, and business +keeps going. That is as deep as the average mind probes into the +process. + +But let us probe a little deeper. It is evident that, in the course of +all this exchanging of goods, some individuals get a larger share than +other individuals. Our government collects an income tax, and thus we +have statistics representing what people are willing to admit about the +share they get. In 1917 it appeared that, speaking roughly, one family +out of six had an income of over $1,000 a year, and one family out of +twelve had an income of over $2,000. But there were 19,000 families +which admitted incomes of over $50,000 a year, and 300 with over +$1,000,000 a year. + +Now the families that get less than a thousand dollars a year obviously +have to spend the greater part of their income upon their immediate +living expenses. But the families that get $50,000 a year do not need +to spend everything, and most of them take the greater part of their +income and reinvest it--that is, they spend it upon the creating of new +machinery of production, railroads, mills, factories, office buildings, +the whole elaborate structure of capitalist industry. + +Exactly what proportion of the total product of industry is thus taken +and reinvested no one can say; but this we know, our cities are growing +at an enormous rate, our manufacturing power is increasing by leaps and +bounds, we are perfecting processes which enable one man to do the work +of a hundred men, which increase the product of one man's labor a +hundredfold. All this goes on blindly, automatically; a Niagara of goods +of all sorts is poured out, and we call it "prosperity." + +But then suddenly a strange and bewildering thing happens. All at once, +and without warning, orders fall off, values begin to drop, business +collapses, factories are shut down, and millions of men are thrown out +of jobs. Merchants look at one another with blanched faces; each one has +been counting on paying his bills with the profits he was going to make, +and now his profits are gone, and he can't pay. The newspapers and +magazines keep insisting that it can't be true, that business is going +to revive next week, that prosperity is just ahead. But the factories +stay shut, and the millions of men stay idle. + +This is the condition in which we find ourselves as I write this book. +It has been happening regularly in our history every ten years or so, +ever since America started; we have had a hundred years to reflect upon +it and to probe into the causes of it, and such is business intelligence +in the most enlightened country in the world, you may search the pages +of our newspapers from the first column of millionaire divorce suits to +the last column of "situations wanted," and nowhere can you find one +word to explain this mysterious calamity of "hard times"--how it comes +to happen to our social system, or what could be done to prevent it! To +supply this deficiency in present day thinking is our next task. + + + + +CHAPTER LVII + +HARD TIMES + + (Explains why capitalist prosperity is a spasmodic thing, and why + abundant production brings distress instead of plenty.) + + +Let us picture a small island inhabited by six men. One of these men +fishes, another hunts, another gathers cocoanuts, another raises goats +for clothing, and so on. The six men among them produce by their labor +all the necessities of their lives, and they exchange their products +with one another. The island is productive, and each of the men is free, +and makes his exchanges on equal terms; on that basis the industry of +the island can continue indefinitely, and there will never be any +trouble. There may sometimes be over-production, but it will not cause +anyone to starve. If the fisherman is unusually lucky one day, he will +be able to take a vacation for a few days, living on his fish and the +products he exchanges for his fish. For the sake of convenience in +future reference, I will describe this happy island as a "free" society; +meaning that each of the members of this society has access on equal +terms to the sources of wealth, and each owns the product of his own +labor, without paying tribute to any one else for the right to labor, or +to exchange his products. + +But now let us suppose that one of the men on the island is strong and +aggressive; he takes a club and knocks down the other five men, and +compels them to sign a piece of paper agreeing that hereafter he is the +president of the land development company of the island, the chief +stockholder in the goat-raising company, and owner of the fishing +concession and the cocoanut grove; also, that hereafter goods shall not +be bartered in kind, but shall be exchanged for money, and that he is +the banker, and also the government, with the right to issue money. In +this society you will find that the real work, the actually productive +work, is done by five men, instead of by six, and these five do not get +the full value of their labor. The fisherman will fish, but his product +will no longer belong to himself; he will get part of it as wages, while +the "business man" takes charge of the balance. So when there is a +lucky day, there will be prosperity in the fishing industry, but this +prosperity will not benefit the fisherman; he will have only his wage, +and when he has caught too many fish, he will not have a few days' +vacation, but will be out of a job. + +And exactly the same thing will happen to the goat-herd. He will +probably have work all the year round, because goats have to be tended, +but he will get barely enough to keep him alive, and the surplus skins +and milk will go to the owner of the no-longer-happy island. Perhaps it +will occur to the owner that the man who raises cocoanuts might also +keep an eye on the goats, and so the goat-herd will be permanently out +of a job, and will turn into what is called a tramp, or vagrant. +Inasmuch as everything to eat on the island belongs to the owner, the +ex-goat-herd will be tempted to become a criminal, and so it will be +necessary for the owner to arm the cocoanut man with a club and make him +into a policeman; or perhaps he will organize the fisherman and the +hunter into a militia for the preservation of law and order. They will +be glad to serve him, because, owing to the extreme productivity of the +island, they will be out of jobs a great part of the time, and but for +the generosity of the business man, would have no way of earning a +living. + +But suppose that the cocoanut man should invent a machine for gathering +a year's supply of nuts in a week; suppose the fisherman should devise a +scheme to fill his boat with fish in a few minutes; and suppose that as +a result of these inventions the business man got so rich that he moved +to Paris, and no longer saw his workers, or even knew their names. Under +these conditions you can see that overproduction and unemployment might +increase on the island; and also the business man might seem less human +and lovable to his wage slaves, and might need a larger police force. It +might even happen that he would discover the need of a propaganda +department, in order to keep his police force loyal, and a secret +service to make sure that agitators did not get into the schools. + +The five islanders, having filled all the barns and storehouses, would +be turned out to starve; and when they asked the reason, they would be +told it was because they had produced a surplus of food. This may sound +grotesque, but it is what is being said to 5,000,000 men in America as I +write. There are clothing-workers who are going about in rags, and they +are told it is because they have produced too much clothing. There are +shoe-workers whose shoes are falling off their feet, and they are told +it is because they have produced too many shoes. There are carpenters +who have no homes, and they are told that a great many homes are needed, +but unfortunately it doesn't pay the builders to go ahead just now. This +may sound like a caricature, but it happens to be the most prominent +single fact in the consciousness of 5,000,000 Americans at the close of +the year 1921. No wonder they are discontented with the present order. + +The solution of the mystery is so simple that the 5,000,000 unemployed +cannot be kept permanently from understanding it. The reason the five +men on the island are starving is because one man owns the island and +the others own nothing. If the island were community property, the five +men would each own a share of the contents of the barns and storehouses, +and would not be starving. If the 100,000,000 people of America owned +the productive machinery of America, then instantly the unemployment +crisis would pass like an evil dream. The farm-workers who need shoes +would exchange their food with the starving shoe-workers, and the +starving shoe-workers would have jobs. They would want clothing, and so +the clothing-makers would start to work; and so on all the way down the +line. There is only one thing necessary to make this possible, and that +is the thing which we have agreed to call the social revolution. + + + + +CHAPTER LVIII + +THE IRON RING + + (Analyzes further the profit system, which strangles production, + and makes true prosperity impossible.) + + +We have seen that in an exploiting society there is a surplus which is +taken by the exploiter; and that under the modern system this surplus +must be sold at a profit before production can continue. The vital fact +in such a society is that the worker has not the money to buy back all +that he produces; therefore it is inevitable that a surplus product +should accumulate. When this happens, production must be cut down, and +during that period the worker is without a job, and without means of +living. The fact that he needs the product does not help him; the point +is that he has not the money to buy it. In such a society the productive +machinery is never used to the full. The machinery is controlled by a +profit-seeking interest, seeking an opportunity to make sales, and +restricting production according to the prospect of sales. So the actual +product bears no relationship to the possible product, and people who +live in an exploiting society can form no conception of true prosperity. + +For, you see, the market is limited by the competitive wage system. We +have seen that in our own rich, prosperous country only one family out +of six has more than $1,000 a year income; only one family out of twelve +has $2,000 a year. It does not make any difference that the warehouses +are bursting with goods; a family constitutes a market of so many +dollars a year, and then, so far as the profit system is concerned, that +family is non-existent; that family stops consuming, and the productive +machinery is halted to that extent. + +I have been accustomed to portray the profit system under the simile of +an iron ring riveted about the body of a baby. That ring would cause the +baby some discomfort at the beginning, but it would not be serious, and +the baby would get used to it. But as the baby grew the trouble caused +by the ring would increase, and finally there would come a time when +the baby would be suffering from a whole complication of troubles, and +for each of these troubles there would be but one remedy--break the +ring. Does the baby cry all the time? Break the ring! Is its digestion +defective? Break the ring! Is it threatened with convulsions or with +blood poisoning? Break the ring! + +Here is our industrial society, growing at a rate never equalled by any +human baby; and here is this iron ring riveted about its middle. Here is +poverty, here is unemployment, here is graft, here is crime, here is war +and plague and famine; and for all these evils there is but one cause, +and but one remedy. Break the ring! Set production free from the +strangulation of the profit system. + +I will admit that there may have been a time in the history of the +social infant when this ring was necessary. I admit that if the great +industrial machine was to be constructed, it was necessary that the mass +of the people should consume only part of what they produced, and should +allow the balance to be reinvested as capital. But now it has been done, +and the process is complete. We have a machine capable of producing many +times more than we can consume; shall we still go on building that +machine? Shall we go on starving ourselves, to save the money, to +multiply over and over again the products, in order that we may be +thrown out of work, and be starved even more completely? + +A few generations ago we had in colonial America a society that in part +at least was "free." In that society everybody got the necessities of +life. They did not have the modern Sunday supplement and the moving +picture show, but they had bread and meat and good substantial clothing, +and furniture so well made that we still preserve it. The children in +those days grew up to be strong and sturdy men and women, who would have +seen nothing to envy in the bodies or minds of the slum population of +New York and Chicago. In short, they had all the true necessities of +life; and yet their work was done by hand, the power process was unknown +and undreamed of. + +Now comes modern machinery, and multiplies the productive power of the +hand laborer by five, by ten, sometimes by a hundred. Here, for example, +is the "Appeal to Reason" selling millions of cheap books for ten cents +apiece, and making a profit on it; installing a gigantic press which +takes paper, sheet after sheet, prints 128 pages of a book at one +impression, and folds and stitches and binds the books, all in one +process, and turns them out complete at the rate of 10,000 copies per +hour. Here is a factory which turns out 100,000 automobiles a month. +Here is a mill which turns out many millions of yards of cloth a month. +If our colonial ancestors had been told about these marvels, they would +have said instantly: "Then, of course, everybody in that society will +have all the books they want, and all the clothing they want, and all +the automobiles. Everybody in that society will have five or ten or one +hundred times as much goods as we have." + +Imagine the bewilderment of our colonial ancestor if he had been told: +"The majority of the people in that society will not have so much of the +real necessities of life as you have. They will have a few cheap +trinkets, designed to tickle their senses; they will have cheap +newspapers, carefully contrived to keep their minds vacant and to keep +them contented with their lot; they will have moving picture shows +constructed for the same purpose; but all their material things will be +flimsy, put together for show and not for permanence; their food will be +adulterated, their clothing will be shoddy, everything they have will be +made, not for their service, but for the profit of some one who lives by +selling to them. The average wage earned by those who do the work of +this new machine civilization will be less than half the amount +necessary to purchase the necessities of a decent life, and one-tenth of +the total population will be living in such poverty that they are unable +to maintain physical fitness, or to rear their children into full sized +men and women." + + + + +CHAPTER LIX + +FOREIGN MARKETS + + (Considers the efforts of capitalism to save itself by marketing + its surplus products abroad, and what results from these efforts.) + + +If our analysis of present-day society is correct, we have the enormous +populations of the modern industrial countries, living always on the +verge of starvation, their chance for survival depending at all times +upon the ability of their employers to find a profitable market for a +surplus of goods. At first the employer seeks that market at home; but +when the home markets are glutted, he goes abroad; and so develops the +phenomenon of foreign trade and rivalry for foreign trade, as the basic +fact of capitalism, and the fundamental cause of modern war. + +Let us get clear a simple distinction concerning foreign trade. There is +a kind of trade which is normal, and would thrive in a "free" society. +In the United States we can produce nearly all the necessities of life, +but there are a few which we cannot produce--rubber, for example, and +bananas, and good music. These things we wish to import. We buy them +from other countries, and incur a debt, which we pay with products which +the other countries need from us; wheat, for example, and copper, and +moving pictures with cowboys in them. This is equal exchange, and a +natural phenomenon. A "free" society would produce such surplus goods as +were necessary to procure the foreign products that it desired. When it +had produced that much, the workers would stop and take a vacation until +they wanted more foreign products. + +But under capitalism we have an entirely different condition--we produce +a surplus of goods which we _have_ to sell in order to keep our +factories running, and to keep our working population from starving. And +note that it does not help us to get back an equal quantity of foreign +goods in exchange. We must have what we call "a favorable balance"; that +is, we must have other people going into debt to us, so that we can be +continually shipping out more goods than we take back; continually +piling up credits which we can "negotiate," or turn into cash, so that +we can go on and repeat the process of making more goods, selling them +for more profits, and putting the surplus into the form of more +machinery, to make still more goods and still more profits. + +And then, after a while, we come upon this embarrassing phenomenon; +nations which buy and do not sell must either do it by sending us gold, +or by our giving them credit. The sending of gold cannot go on +indefinitely, because then we should have all the gold, and if other +nations had none that would destroy their credit. On the other hand, +business cannot be done by credit indefinitely; for the very essence of +credit is a promise to pay, and payment can only be made in goods, and +how can we take the goods without ruining our own industry? + +Fifteen years ago I pointed this out in a book. The argument was +irrefutable, and the conclusion inescapable, but the few critics who +noted it repeated their usual formula about "dreamers and theorists." +Now, however, the business mills have ground on, and what was theory has +become fact before our eyes. We have trusted the nations of Europe for +some $10,000,000,000 worth of goods, and they are powerless to pay, and +if they did pay, they would bankrupt American industry. France wishes to +collect an enormous indemnity from Germany, but nobody can figure out +how this indemnity can be paid without ruining French industry. The +French have demanded coal from Germany, and have got more than they can +use, and are "dumping" it in Belgium and Holland, with the result that +the British coal industry is ruined. The French clamor that the Germans +must pay for the destruction they wrought in Northern France, and the +Germans offer to send German workmen to rebuild the ruined towns; but +the French denounce this as an insult--it would deprive French +workingmen of their jobs! So I might continue for pages, pointing out +the manifold absurdities which result from a system of industry for the +profit of a few, instead of for the use of all. + +Ever since I first began to read the newspapers, some twenty-five or +thirty years ago, all our political life has been nothing but the +convulsions of a social body tortured by the constricting ring of the +profit system. Everywhere one group struggling for advantage over +another group, and politicians engaged in playing one interest against +another interest! My boyhood recollections of public life consist of +campaign slogans having to do with the tariff: "production and +prosperity," "reciprocity," "the full dinner pail," "the foreigner pays +the tax," etc. + +The workingman, under the profit system, is like a man pounding away at +a pump. He can get a thin trickle of water from the spout of the pump if +he works hard enough, but in order to get it he has to supply ten times +as much to some one who has tapped the pipe. But the tapping has been +done underground, where the workingman cannot see it. All the workingman +knows is that there is no job for him if the products of "cheap foreign +labor" are allowed to be "dumped" on the American market. That is +obvious, and so he votes for a tax on foreign imports, high enough to +enable his own employer to market at a profit. He does not realize that +he is thus raising the price of everything that he buys, and so leaving +himself worse off than he was before. + +All governments are delighted with this tariff device, because they are +thus enabled to get money from the public without the public's knowing +it. "The foreigner pays the tax," we are told, and as a result of this +arrangement the steel trust just before the war was selling its product +at a high price to the American people, and taking its surplus abroad +and selling it to the foreigner at half the domestic price. And we see +this same thing in every line of manufacture, and all over the world. We +see one nation after another withdrawing itself as a market for +manufactured products, and entering the lists as a marketer. One more +nation now able to fill all its own needs, and going out hungrily to +look for foreign customers, adding to the glut of the world's +manufactured products and the ferocity of international competition! + +At the close of the Civil War the total exports of the United States +averaged approximately $300,000,000, and the total imports were about +the same. In 1892 the exports first touched $1,000,000,000, while the +imports were about nine-tenths of that sum. In the year 1913 the exports +were nearly $2,500,000,000, while the imports were $600,000,000 less; +and in the year 1920 our exports were over $8,000,000,000 and our +imports a little over $5,000,000,000! So we have a "favorable balance" +of almost $3,000,000,000 a year--and as a result we are on the verge of +ruin! + +This "iron ring" of overproduction and lack of market exercises upon our +industrial body a steady pressure, a slow strangling. But because the +body is in convulsions, struggling to break the ring, the pressure of +the ring is worse at some times than at others. We have periods of what +we call "prosperity," followed by periods of panic and hard times. You +must understand that only a small part of our business is done by means +of cash payments, whether in gold or silver or paper money. Close to 99% +of our business is done by means of credit, and this introduces into the +process a psychological factor. The business man expects certain +profits, and he capitalizes these expectations. Business booms, because +everybody believes everybody else's promises; credit expands like a huge +balloon, with the breath of everybody's enthusiasm. But meantime real +business, the real market, remains just what it was before; it cannot +increase, because of the iron ring which restricts the buying power of +the mass of the people by the competitive wage. So presently the time +comes when somebody realizes that he has over-capitalized his hopes; he +curtails his orders, he calls in his money, and the impulse thus started +precipitates a crash in the whole business world. We had such a crash in +1907, and I remember a Wall Street man explaining it in a magazine +article entitled, "Somebody Asked for a Dollar." + +We learned one lesson by that panic; at least, the big financial men +learned it, and had Congress pass what is called the "Federal Reserve +Act," a provision whereby in time of need the government issues +practically unlimited credit to banks. This, of course, is fine for the +banks; it puts the credit of everybody else behind them, and all they +have to do is to stop lending money--except to the big insiders--and sit +back and wait, while the little men go to the wall, and the mass of us +live on our savings or starve. We saw this happen in the year 1920, and +for the first time we had "hard times" without having a financial panic. +But instead we see prices staying high--because the banks have issued so +much paper money and bank credits. + + + + +CHAPTER LX + +CAPITALIST WAR + + (Shows how the competition for foreign markets leads nations + automatically into war.) + + +In a discussion of the world's economic situation, published in 1906, +the writer portrayed the ruling class of Germany as sitting in front of +a thermometer, watching the mercury rising, and knowing that when it +reached the top, the thermometer would break. This thermometer was the +German class system of government, and the mercury was the Socialist +vote. In 1870 the vote was 30,000, in 1884 it was 549,000, in 1893 it +was 1,876,000, in 1903 it was 3,008,000, in 1907 it was 3,250,000, in +1911 it was 4,250,000. Writing between 1906 and 1913, I again and again +pointed out that this increase was the symptom of social discontent in +Germany, caused by the overproduction of invested capital throughout the +world, and the intensification of the competition for world markets. I +pointed out that a slight increase in the vote would be sufficient to +transfer to the working class of Germany the political power of the +German state; and I said that the ruling class of Germany would never +permit that to happen--when it was ready to happen Germany would go to +war, to seize the trade privileges of some other nation. + +There was a time when wars were caused by national and racial hatreds. +There are still enough of these venerable prejudices left in the world, +but no student of the subject would deny that the main source of modern +wars is commercial rivalry. In 1917 we sent Eugene V. Debs to prison for +declaring that the late world war was a war of capitalist greed. But two +years later President Wilson, who had waged the war, declared in a +public speech that everybody knew it had been a war of commercial +rivalries. + +The aims of modern war-makers are two. First, capitalism must have raw +materials, including coal and oil, the sources of power, and gold and +silver, the bases of credit. Parts of the world which are so unfortunate +as to be rich in these substances become the bone of contention between +rival financial groups, organized as nations. Some sarcastic writer has +defined a "backward" nation as one which has gold mines and no navy. We +are horrified to read of the wars of the French monarchs, caused by the +jealous quarrels of mistresses; but in 1905 we saw Russia and Japan go +to war and waste a million lives because certain Russian grand dukes had +bribed certain Chinese mandarins and obtained concessions of timber on +the Yalu River. We now observe France and Germany vowed to undying hate +because of iron mines in Lorraine, and the efforts of France to take the +coal mines of Silesia from Germany, and give them to Poland, which is +another name for French capitalism. + +The other end sought by the war-makers is markets for manufactured +products, and control of trade routes, coaling stations and cables +necessary to the building up of foreign trade. England has been +"mistress of the seas" for some 300 years, which meant that her traders +had obtained most of these advantages. But then came Germany, with her +newly developed commercialism, shoving her rival out of the way. The +Englishman was easy-going; he liked to play cricket, and stop and drink +tea every afternoon. But the German worked all day and part of the +night; he trained himself as a specialist, he studied the needs of his +customers--all of which to the Englishman was "unfair" competition. But +here were the populations of the crowded slums, dependent for their +weekly wage and their daily bread upon the ability of the factories to +go on turning out products! Here was the ever-blackening shadow of +unemployment, the mutterings of social discontent, the agitators on the +soap-boxes, the workers listening to them with more and more eager +attention, and the journalists and politicians and bankers watching this +phenomenon with a ghastly fear. + +So came the great war. Social discontent was forgotten over night, and +England and France plunged in to down their hated rival, once and for +all time. Now they have succeeded: Germany's ships have been taken from +her, and likewise her cables and coaling stations; the Berlin-Bagdad +Railroad is a forgotten dream; the British sit in Constantinople, and +the traffic goes by sea. American capitalism wakes up, and rubs its eyes +after a debauch of Presbyterian idealism, and discovers that it has paid +out some $20,000,000,000, in order to confer all these privileges and +advantages upon its rivals! + +Ever since I can remember the world, there have been peace societies; I +look back in history and discover that ever since there have been wars, +there have been prophets declaiming against them in the name of +humanity and God. As I write, there is a great world conference on +disarmament in session in Washington, and all good Americans hope that +war is to be ended and permanent peace made safe. All that I can do at +this juncture is to point out the fundamental and all-controlling fact +of present-day economics: that for the ruling class of any country to +agree to disarmament and the abolition of war, is for that class to sign +its own death warrant and cut its own throat. American capitalism can +survive on this earth only by strangling and destroying Japanese +capitalism and British capitalism, and doing it before long. The +far-sighted capitalists on both sides know that, and are making their +preparations accordingly. + +What the members of the peace societies and the diplomats of the +disarmament conferences do is to cut off the branches of the tree of +war. They leave the roots untouched, and then, when the tree continues +to thrive, they are astounded. I conclude this chapter with a concrete +illustration, cut from my morning newspaper. We went to war against +German militarism, and to make the world safe for democracy--meaning +thereby capitalist commercialism. We commanded the German people to +"beat their swords into plough-shares"; that is, to set their Krupp +factories to making tools of peace; and they did so. We saddled them +with an enormous indemnity, making them our serfs for a generation or +two, and compelling them to hasten out into the world markets, to sell +their goods and raise gold to pay us. And now, how does their behavior +strike us? Do we praise their industry, and fidelity to their +obligations? Here are the headlines of a news despatch, published by the +Los Angeles Times on December 10, 1921, at the top of the front page, +right hand column, the most conspicuous position in the paper. Read it, +and understand the sources of modern war! + + _NEW ATTACK BY BERLIN_ + + * * * * * + + DUMPING GOODS BY WHOLESALE + + * * * * * + +Cheap German Trash Puts Thousands of Americans Out of Employment + + * * * * * + + Glove Plants Shut Down and Potash Industry Killed + by Teuton Intrigue + + + + +CHAPTER LXI + +THE POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCTION + + (Shows how much wealth we could produce if we tried, and how we + proved it when we had to.) + + +One of the commonest arguments in defense of the present business system +runs as follows: The amount of money which is paid to labor is greatly +in excess of the amount which is paid to capital. Suppose that tomorrow +you were to abolish all dividends and profits, and divide the money up +among the wage workers, how much would each one get? The sum is figured +for some big industry, and it is shown that each worker would get one or +two hundred dollars additional per year. Obviously, this would not bring +the millennium; it would hardly be worth while to take the risk of +reducing production in order to gain so small a result. + +But now we are in position to realize the fallacy of such an argument. +The tax which capital levies upon labor is not the amount which capital +takes for itself, but the amount which it prevents labor from producing. +The real injury of the profit system is not that it pays so large a +reward to a ruling class; it is the "iron ring" which it fastens about +industry, barring the workers from access to the machinery of production +except when the product can be sold for a profit. Labor pays an enormous +reward to the business man for his management of industry, but it would +pay labor to reward the business man even more highly, if only he would +take his goods in kind, and would permit labor, after this tax is paid, +to go on making those things which labor itself so desperately needs. + +But, you see, the business man does not take his goods in kind. The +owner of a great automobile factory may make for himself one automobile +or a score of automobiles, but he quickly comes to a limit where he has +no use for any more, and what he wants is to sell automobiles and "make +money." He does not permit his workers to make automobiles for +themselves, or for any one else. He reserves the product of the factory +for himself, and when he can no longer sell automobiles at a profit, he +shuts the workers out and automobile-making comes to an end in that +community. Thus it appears that the "iron ring" which strangles the +income of labor, strangles equally the income of capital. It paralyzes +the whole social body, and so limits production that we can form no +conception of what prosperity might and ought to be. + +Consider the situation before the war. We were all of us at work under +the competitive system, and with the exception of a few parasites, +everybody was occupied pretty close to the limit of his energy. If any +one had said that it would be possible for our community to pitch in and +double or treble our output, you would have laughed at him. But suddenly +we found ourselves at war, and in need of a great increase in output, +and we resolved one and all to achieve this end. We did not waste any +time in theoretical discussions about the rights of private capital, or +the dangers of bureaucracy and the destruction of initiative. Our +government stepped in and took control; it took the railroads and +systematized them, it took the big factories and told them exactly what +to make, it took the raw materials and allotted them, where they were +needed, it fixed the prices of labor, and ordered millions of men to +this or that place, to this or that occupation. It even seized the +foodstuffs and directed what people should eat. In a thousand ways it +suppressed competition and replaced it by order and system. And what was +the result? + +We took five million of our young men, the very cream of our industrial +force, and withdrew them from all productive activities; we put them +into uniforms, and put them through a training which meant that they +were eating more food and wearing more clothing and consuming more goods +than nine-tenths of them had ever done in their lives before. We built +camps for them, and supplied them with all kinds of costly products of +labor, such as guns and cartridges, automobiles and airplanes. We +treated two million of them to an expensive trip to Europe, and there we +set them to work burning up and destroying the products of industry, to +the value of many billions of dollars. And not only did we supply our +own armies, we supplied the armies of all our allies. We built millions +of dollars worth of ships, and we sent over to Europe, whether by +private business or by government loans, some $10,000,000,000 worth of +goods--more than ten years of our exports before the war. + +All the labor necessary to produce all this wealth had to be withdrawn +from industry, so far as concerned our domestic uses and needs. It would +not be too much to say that from domestic industry we withdrew a total +of ten million of our most capable labor force. I think it would be +reasonable to say that two-thirds of our productive energies went to war +purposes, and only one-third was available for home use. And yet, we did +it without a particle of real suffering. Many of us worked hard, but few +of us worked harder than usual. Most of us got along with less wheat and +sugar, but nobody starved, nobody really suffered ill health, and our +poor made higher wages and had better food than ever in their lives +before. If this argument is sound, it proves that our productive +machinery is capable, when properly organized and directed, of producing +three times the common necessities of our population. Assuming that our +average working day is nine hours, we could produce what we at present +consume by three hours of intelligently directed work per day. + +Let us look at the matter from another angle. Just at present the hero +of the American business man is Herbert Hoover; and Mr. Hoover recently +appointed a committee, not of Socialists and "Utopians," but of +engineering experts, to make a study of American productive methods. The +report showed that American industry was only thirty-five or forty per +cent efficient. Incidentally, this "Committee on Waste" assessed, in the +case of the building industry, sixty-five per cent of the blame against +management and only twenty-one per cent against labor; in six +fundamental industries it assessed fifty per cent of the blame against +management and less than twenty-five per cent against labor. Fifteen +years ago a professor of engineering, Sidney A. Reeve by name, made an +elaborate study of the wastes involved in our haphazard and planless +industrial methods, and embodied his findings in a book, "The Cost of +Competition." His conclusion was that of the total amount of energy +expended in America, more than seventy per cent was wasted. We were +doing one hundred per cent of work and getting thirty per cent of +results. If we would get one hundred per cent of results, we should +produce three and one-third times as much wealth, and the income of our +workers would be increased one or two thousand dollars a year. + +Robert Blatchford in his book, "Merrie England," has a saying to the +effect that it makes all the difference, when half a dozen men go out to +catch a horse, whether they spend their time catching the horse or +keeping one another from catching the horse. Our next task will be to +point out a few of the ways in which good, honest American business men +and workingmen, laboring as intelligently and conscientiously as they +know how, waste their energies in keeping one another from producing +goods. + + + + +CHAPTER LXII + +THE COST OF COMPETITION + + (Discusses the losses of friction in our productive machine, those + which are obvious and those which are hidden.) + + +The United States government is by far the largest single business +enterprise in the United States; and a study of congressional +appropriations in 1920, made by the United States Bureau of Standards, +reveals the fact that ninety-three per cent of the total income of the +government went to paying for past wars or preparing for future wars. We +have shown that modern war is a product of the profit system, and if +civilized nations would put their industry upon a co-operative basis, +they could forget the very idea of war, and we should then receive +fourteen times as much benefit from our government as we receive at +present; we should have fourteen times as good roads, fourteen times as +many schools, fourteen times as prompt a postoffice and fourteen times +as efficient a Congress. What it would mean to industry to abolish war +is something wholly beyond the power of our imagination to conceive; for +along with ninety-three per cent of our government money there goes into +military preparation the vast bulk of our intellectual energy and +inventive genius, our moral and emotional equipment. + +Next, strikes and the losses incidental to strikes, and the costs of +preparing against strikes. This includes, not merely the actual loss of +working time, it includes police and militia, private armies of gunmen, +and great secret service agencies, whose total income runs up into +hundreds of millions of dollars per year. Industrial warfare is simply +the method by which capitalists and workers determine the division of +the product of industry; as if two men should co-operate in raising +poultry, and then fall to quarrelling over the ownership of the eggs, +and settle the matter by throwing the eggs at each other's heads. + +Next, bankruptcy. Statistics show that regularly some ten per cent of +our business enterprises fail every year. Take any block occupied by +little business men, grocers and haberdashers and "notions," and you +will see that they are always changing. Each change represents a human +tragedy, and the total is a frightful waste of human energy; it happens +because we can think of no better way to distribute goods than to go +through the work of setting up a business, and then discover that it +cannot succeed because the neighborhood is already overstocked with that +kind of goods. + +Next, fires which are a result of bankruptcy. You may laugh, perhaps, +thinking that I am making a joke; but every little man who fails in +business knows that he has a choice of going down in the social scale, +or of setting fire to his stock some night, and having a big insurance +company set him on his feet again. The result is that a certain +percentage of bankrupts do regularly set fire to their stores. Some +fifteen years ago there was published in "Collier's Weekly" a study of +the costs to society of incendiary fires. The Fire Underwriters' +Association estimated the amount as a quarter of a billion dollars a +year; and all this cost, you understand, is paid out of the pockets of +those who insure their homes and their stores, and do not burn them +down. + +From this follows the costs of insurance, and the whole insurance +industry, which is inevitable under the profit system, but is entire +waste so far as true production is concerned. Big enterprises like the +Steel Trust do not carry insurance, and neither does the United States +Postoffice. They are wealthy enough to stand their own losses. A +national co-operative enterprise would be in the same position, and the +whole business of collecting money for insurance and keeping records and +carrying on lawsuits would be forgotten. + +Next, advertising. It would be no exaggeration to say that seventy per +cent of the material published in American newspapers and magazines +today is pure waste; and therefore seventy per cent of the labor of all +the people who cut down forests and manufacture and transport paper and +set up type and print and distribute publications is wasted. There is, +of course, a small percentage of advertising that is useful, but most of +it is boasting and falsehood, and even where it tells the truth it +simply represents the effort of a merchant to persuade you to buy in his +store instead of in a rival store--an achievement which is profitable to +the merchant, but utterly useless to society as a whole. + +This same statement applies to all traveling salesmen, and to a great +percentage of middlemen. It applies also to a great part of delivery +service. If you live in a crowded part of any city, you see a dozen milk +wagons pass your door every morning, doing the work which could be done +exactly as well by one. That is only one case out of a thousand I might +name. + +Next, crime. I have already discussed the crime of arson, and I might +discuss the crimes of pocket-picking, burglary, forgery, and a hundred +others in the same way. I am aware of the fact that there may be a few +born criminals; there may be a few congenital cheats, whom we should +have to put in hospitals. But we have only to consult the crime records, +during the war and after the war, in order to see that when jobs are +hunting men there are few criminals, and when men are hunting jobs there +are many criminals. I have no figures as to the cost of administering +justice in the United States--policemen, courts and jails--but it must +be hundreds of millions of dollars every year. + +I have discussed at great length the suppression of the productive power +of society. I should not fail to mention the suppression of the +inventive power of society, a factor less obvious, but probably in the +long run even greater. Every one familiar with the inside of a big +industry knows that hundreds and even thousands of useful processes are +entirely suppressed, because it would not pay one particular concern to +stand the expense of the changes involved. You know how, during the war, +our government brought all the makers of engines together and perfected +in triumph a "Liberty motor." But now we have gone back to private +interest and competition, and each concern is jealously engaged in +guarding its own secrets, and depriving industry as a whole of the +benefit of everything that it learns. Each is spying upon the others, +stealing the secrets of the others, stealing likewise from those who +invent new ideas--and thus discouraging them from inventing any more. + +I use this word "discourage," and I might write a chapter upon it. What +human imagination can conceive the amount of social energy that is lost +because of the factor of discouragement, directly caused by the +competitive method? Who can figure what it means to human society that a +great percentage of the people in it should be haunted by fear of one +sort or another--the poor in fear of unemployment, sickness and +starvation, the little business man in fear of bankruptcy and suicide, +the big business man in fear of hard times and treachery of his +competitors, the idle rich in fear of robbery and blackmail, and the +whole community in fear of foreign war and domestic tumult! + +Anyone might go on and elaborate these factors that I have named, and +think of scores of others. Anyone familiar with business life or with +industrial processes would be able to put his finger on this or that +enormous saving which he would be able to make if he and all his rivals +could combine and come to an agreement. This has been proven over and +over again in large-scale industry; it is the fact which has made of +large-scale industry an overwhelming power, sucking all the profits to +itself, reaching out and taking in new fields of human activity, and +setting at naught all popular clamor and even legal terrors. How can +anyone, seeing these facts, bring himself to deny that if we did +systematize production and make it one enterprise, precisely adapted to +one end, we should enormously increase the results of human labor, and +the benefit to all who do the world's work? + +A good deal of this waste we can stop when we get ready, and other parts +of it our bountiful mother nature will replace. When in a world war we +kill some ten or twenty millions of the flower of our young manhood, we +have only to wait several generations, and our race will be as good as +ever. But, on the other hand, there is some waste that can never be +repaired, and this is the thing truly frightful to contemplate. When we +dig the iron ore out of the bowels of the earth and rust it away in +wars, we are doing something our race can never undo. And the same is +true of many of our precious substances: phosphorus, sulphur, potash. +When we cut down the forests from our mountain slopes, and lay bare the +earth, we not merely cause floods and washouts, and silt up our harbors, +we take away from the surface of our land the precious life-giving soil, +and make a habitable land into a desert, which no irrigating and +reforesting can ever completely restore. The Chinese have done that for +many centuries, and we are following in their footsteps; more than six +hundred million wagon-loads of our best soil are washed down to the sea +every year! If you wish to know about these matters, I send you to a +book, "On Board the Good Ship Earth," by Herbert Quick. It is one of the +most heart-breaking books you ever read, yet it is merely a quiet +statement of the facts about our present commercial anarchy. + + + + +CHAPTER LXIII + +SOCIALISM AND SYNDICALISM + + (Discusses the idea of the management of industry by the state, and + the idea of its management by the trade unions.) + + +Let us now assume that we desire to abolish the wastes of the +competitive method, and to put our industry on a basis of co-operation. +How should we effect the change, and how should we run our industry +after it was done? + +Let us take the United States Steel Corporation. What change would be +necessary to the socializing of this concern? United States Steel is +owned by a group of stockholders, and governed by a board of directors +elected by them. The owners are now to be bought out with government +bonds, and the board of directors retired. It may also be necessary to +replace a certain number of the higher executive officials, who are +imbued entirely with the point of view of this board, and have to do +with finance, rather than with production. Of course, some other +governing authority would have to be put in control. What would this +authority be? There are several plans before the world, several +different schools of thought, which we shall consider one by one. + +First, the Socialist program. The Socialist says, "Consider the +postoffice, how that is run. It is run by the President, who appoints a +Postmaster-General as his executive. Let us therefore turn the steel +industry over to the government, and let the President appoint another +member of his cabinet, a Director of Steel; or let there be a +commission, similar to the Interstate Commerce Commission, or the +various war industry boards." Any form of management of the steel +industry which provides for its control and operation by our United +States government is Socialism of one sort or another. + +There has been, of late, a great deal of dissatisfaction with +government, on the part of the general public, and also of labor. The +postoffice clerks, for example, complain that they are inadequately paid +and autocratically managed, deprived of their rights not merely as +workers but as citizens. The steel workers complain that when they go on +strike against their masters, the government sends in troops and +crushes their strike, regardless of the rights or wrongs of it. In order +to meet such tactics, labor goes into politics, and elects here and +there its own representatives; but these representatives become +mysteriously affected by the bureaucratic point of view, and even where +they try hard, they do not accomplish much for labor. Therefore, labor +becomes disgusted with the political process, and labor men do not +welcome the prospect of being managed by government. + +If you ask such men, they will say: "No; the politicians don't know +anything about industry, and can't learn. The people who know about +industry are those who work in it. The true way to run an industry is +through an organization of the workers, both of hand and brain. The true +way to run the Steel Trust is for all the workers in it, men and women, +high and low, to be recognized by law as citizens of that industry; each +shop must elect its own delegates to run that shop, and elect a delegate +to a central parliament of the industry, and this industry in turn must +elect delegates to a great parliament or convention of all the delegates +of all the industries. In such a central gathering every one would be +represented, because every person would be a producer of some sort, and +whether he was a steel worker or a street sweeper or a newsboy, he would +have a vote at the place where he earns his living, and would have a say +in the management of his job. The great central parliament would elect +an executive committee and a president, and so we should have a +government of the workers, by the workers, for the workers." This idea +is known as Syndicalism, derived from the French word "syndicat," +meaning a labor union. Since the Russian revolution it has come to be +known as soviet government, "soviet" being the Russian word for trade +council. + +Now, taking these two ideas of Socialism and Syndicalism, it is evident +that they may be combined in various ways, and applied in varying +degrees. It is perfectly conceivable, for example, that the people of +the United States might elect a president pledged to call a parliament +of industry, and to delegate the control of industry to this parliament. +He might delegate the control to a certain extent, and provide for its +extension, step by step; so our society might move into Syndicalism by +the way of Socialism. You have only to put your mind on the +possibilities of the situation to realize that one method shades into +the other with a great variety of stages. + +Consider next the stages between capitalism and Socialism. We have in +the United States some industries which are purely capitalistic; for +example, the Steel Trust, which is privately owned, and has been +powerful enough, not merely to suppress every effort of its workers to +organize, but every effort of the government to regulate it. On the +other hand, the United States Postoffice represents State Socialism; +although the workers have been forbidden to organize, and the management +of the industry is so arbitrary that I have always preferred to call it +State Capitalism. Likewise the United States army and navy represent +State Socialism. When we had the job of putting the Kaiser out of +business, we did not hire Mr. Rockefeller to do it; it never once +occurred to our advocates of "individualism," of "capitalist enterprise +and initiative," to suggest that we should hire out our army and navy, +or employ the Steel Trust or the Powder Trust to organize its own army +and navy to do the fighting for us. Likewise, for the most part, we run +the job of educating our children by the method of municipal Socialism. +We run our libraries in the same way, and likewise our job of fire +protection. + +It is interesting to note how in every country the line between +capitalism and Socialism is drawn in a different place. In America we +run practically all our libraries for ourselves, but it would seem to us +preposterous to think of running our theatres. In Europe, however, they +have state-owned theatres, which set a far higher standard of art than +anything we know at home. Also, they have state-owned orchestras and +opera-houses, something we Americans leave to the subscriptions of +millionaires. In Europe it seems perfectly natural to the people that +the state should handle their telegrams in connection with the +postoffice; but if you urge government ownership of the telegraphs in +the United States, they tell you that the proposition is "socialistic," +and that saves the need of thinking about it. We take it for granted +that our cities could run the libraries--even though we were glad when +Carnegie came along and saved us the need of appropriating money for +buildings. Just why a city should be able to run a library, and should +not be able to run an opera-house, or a newspaper, is something which +has never been made clear to me. + +Let us next examine the stages between capitalism and Syndicalism. A +great many large corporations are making experiments in what they call +"shop management," allowing the workers membership in the boards of +directors and a voice in the conditions of their labor. This is +Syndicalism so far as it goes. Likewise it is Syndicalism when the +clothing workers and the clothing manufacturers meet together and agree +to the setting up of a permanent committee to work out a set of rules +for the conduct of the industry, and to fix wages from time to time. +Obviously, these things are capable of indefinite extension, and in +Europe they are being developed far more rapidly. For example, in Italy +the agricultural workers are organized, and are gradually taking +possession of the great estates, which are owned by absentee landlords. +They wage war upon these estates by means of sabotage and strikes, and +then they buy up the estates at bargain prices and develop them by +co-operative labor. This has been going on in Italy for ten years, and +has become the most significant movement in the country. It is a triumph +of pure Syndicalism; and such is the power of pure capitalism in the +United States that the American people have not been allowed to know +anything about this change. + +Next, what are the stages between Socialism and Syndicalism? These also +are infinite in number and variety. As a matter of fact, there are very +few Socialists who advocate State Socialism without any admixture of +Syndicalism. The regular formula of the Socialist party is "the social +ownership and democratic control of the instruments and means of +production;" and what the phrase "democratic control" means is simply +that you introduce into your Socialist mixture a certain flavoring of +Syndicalism, greater or less, according to your temperament. In the same +way there are many Syndicalists who are inclined toward Socialism. In +every convention of radical trade unionists, such as, for example, the +I. W. W., you find some who favor political action, and these will have +the same point of view as the more radical members of the Socialist +party, who urge a program of industrial as well as political action. + + + + +CHAPTER LXIV + +COMMUNISM AND ANARCHISM + + (Considers the idea of goods owned in common, and the idea of a + society without compulsion, and how these ideas have fared in + Russia.) + + +The Russian revolution has familiarized us with the word Communism. In +the beginning of the revolutionary movement Communism denoted what we +now call Socialism; for example, the Communist Manifesto of Marx and +Engels became the platform of the Social-democratic parties. But because +most of these parties supported their governments during the war, the +more radical elements have now rejected the word Socialism, and taken up +the old word Communism. In the Russian revolution the Communists went so +far as to seize all the property of the rich, and so the word Communism +has come to bear something of its early Christian significance. + +It is obvious that here, too, it is a question of degree, and Socialism +will shade into Communism by an infinite variety of stages, depending +upon what forms of property it is decided to socialize. The Socialist +formula commonly accepted is that "goods socially used shall be socially +owned, and goods privately used shall be privately owned." If you own a +factory, it will be taken by the state, or by the workers, and made +social property like the postoffice; but no Socialist wants to socialize +your clothing, or your books, any more than he wants to socialize your +toothbrush. + +But when you come to apply this formula, you run quickly into +difficulties. Suppose you are a millionaire, and own a palace with one +or two hundred rooms, and a hundred servants. Do you use that socially, +or do you use it privately? And suppose there is a scarcity of houses, +and thousands of children are dying of tuberculosis in crowded tenement +rooms? You own a dozen automobiles, and do you use them all privately? I +point out to you that in time of emergency the capitalist state does not +hesitate over such a problem; it seizes your palace and turns it into a +hospital, it takes all your cars and uses them to carry troops. It +should be obvious that a proletarian state would be tempted by this +precedent. + +The Communists also have a formula, which reads: "From each according to +his ability, to each according to his necessity." I do not see how any +sensitive person can deny that this is an extremely fine statement of an +ideal in social life. We take it quite for granted in family life; if +you knew a family in which that rule did not apply, you would consider +it an unloving and uncivilized family. I believe that when once industry +has been socialized, and we have a chance to see what production can +become, we shall find ourselves quickly adopting that family custom as +our law, for all except a few congenital criminals and cheats. We shall +find that we can produce so much wealth that it is not worth while +keeping count of unimportant items. If today you meet someone on the +street and ask him for a match or a pin, you do not think of offering to +pay him. This is an automatic consequence of the cheapness of matches +and pins. Once upon a time you were stopped on the road every few miles +and made to pay a few cents toll. I remember seeing toll-gates when I +was a boy, but I don't think I have seen one for twenty years. + +In exactly the same way, under socialized industry, we shall probably +make street-car traffic free, and then railroad traffic; we shall +abolish water meters and gas meters and electric light meters, also +telephone charges, except perhaps for long distances, and telegraph +tolls for personal messages. Then, presently, we shall find ourselves +with such a large wheat crop that we shall make bread free; and then +music and theatres and clothing and books. At present we use furniture +and clothing as a means of manifesting our economic superiority to our +fellowmen. One of the most charming books in our language is Veblen's +"Theory of the Leisure Class," in which these processes are studied. We +shall, of course, have to raise up a new generation, unaccustomed to the +idea of class and of class distinction, before we could undertake to +supply people with all the clothing they wanted free of charge. + +The Russian theorists made haste to carry out these ideas all at once; +they tried to leap several centuries in the evolution of Russian +society. They ordained complete Communism in land; but the peasants +would have nothing to do with such notions--each wanted his own land, +and what he produced on it. The Soviets have now been forced to give +way, not merely to the peasants, but to the traders; and so we see once +again that it is better to take one step forward than to take several +steps forward and then several steps backward. The Russian revolution +is not yet completed, so no one can say how many steps backward it will +be forced to take. + +This revolution was an interesting combination of the ideas of Socialism +and Syndicalism. The trade unionists seized the factories, and made an +effort at democratic control of industry. At the same time the state was +overthrown by a political party, the Bolsheviks, who set up a +dictatorship of the proletariat. Because of civil war and outside +invasion, the democratic elements in the experiment have been more and +more driven into the background, and the authority of the state has +correspondingly increased. This causes us to think of the Soviet system +as necessarily opposed to democracy, but this is not in any way a +necessary thing. There is no inevitable connection between industrial +control by the workers and a dictatorship over the state. In Germany the +state is proceeding to organize a national parliament of industry, and +to provide for management of the factories by the labor unions. The +Italian government has promised to do the same thing. These, of course, +are capitalist governments, and they will keep their promises only as +they are made to; but it is a perfectly possible thing that in either of +these countries a vote of the people might change the government, and +put in authority men who would really proceed to turn industry over to +the control of the workers. That would be the Soviet or Syndicalist +system, brought about by democratic means, without dictatorship or civil +war. + +Another group of revolutionary thinkers whose theories must be mentioned +are the Anarchists. The word Anarchy is commonly used as a synonym for +chaos and disorder, which it does not mean at all. It means the absence +of authority; and it is characteristic of people's view of life that +they are unable to conceive of there being such a thing as order, unless +it is maintained by force. The theory of the Anarchist is that order is +a necessity of the human spirit, and that people would conform to the +requirements of a just order by their own free will and without external +compulsion. The Anarchist believes that the state is an instrument of +class oppression, and has no other reason for being. He wishes the +industries to be organized by free associations of the people who work +in them. + +Some of the greatest of the world's moral teachers have been Anarchists: +Jesus, for example, and Shelley and Thoreau and Tolstoi, and in our time +Kropotkin. These men voiced the highest aspirations of the human +spirit, and the form of society which they dreamed is the one we set +before us as our final goal. But the world does not leap into perfection +all at once, and meantime here we have the capitalist system and the +capitalist state, and what attitude shall we take to them? There are +impassioned idealists who refuse to make any terms with injustice, or to +submit to compulsion, and these preach the immediate destruction of +capitalist government, and capitalist government responds with prison +and torture, and so we have some Anarchists who throw bombs. + +There are those who call themselves "philosophic" Anarchists, wishing to +indicate thereby that they preach this doctrine, but do not attempt to +carry it into action as yet. Some among these verge toward the Communist +point of view, and call themselves Communist-anarchists; such was +Kropotkin, whose theories of social organization you will find in his +book "The Conquest of Bread." There are others who call themselves +Syndicalist-anarchists, finding their centers of free association in the +radical labor unions. + +After the Russian revolution, the Anarchists found themselves in a +dilemma, and their groups were torn apart like every other party and +class in Russia. Here was a new form of state set up in society, a +workers' state, and what attitude should the Anarchists take toward +that? Many of them stood out for their principles, and resisted the +Bolshevik state, and put the Bolsheviks under the embarrassing necessity +of throwing them into jail. We good orthodox Americans, who are +accustomed to dump Socialists and Communists and Syndicalists and +Anarchists all together into one common kettle, took Emma Goldman and +Alexander Berkman and shipped them over to Russia, where we thought they +belonged. Now our capitalist newspapers find it strange that these +Anarchists do not like the Russian government any better than they like +the American government! + +On the other hand, a great many Anarchists have suddenly found +themselves compelled by the Russian situation to face the facts of life. +They have decided that a government is not such a bad thing after +all--when it is your own government! Robert Minor, for example, has +recanted his Anarchist position, and joined the Communists in advocating +the dropping of all differences among the workers, all theories as to +the future, and concentrating upon the immediate task of overthrowing +capitalist government and keeping it overthrown. In every civilized +nation the Russian revolution has had this effect upon the extreme +revolutionists. It has given them a definite aim and a definite program +upon which they can unite; it has presented to capitalist government the +answer of force to force; it has shown the masters of industry in +precise and definite form what they have to face--unless they set +themselves immediately and in good faith to the task of establishing +real democracy in industry. + + + + +CHAPTER LXV + +SOCIAL REVOLUTION + + (How the great change is coming in different industries, and how we + may prepare to meet it.) + + +From a study of the world's political revolutions we observe that a +variety of governmental forms develop, and that different circumstances +in each country produce different institutions. Suppose that back in the +days of the French monarchy some one asked you how France was going to +be governed as a political republic; how would elections be held, what +would be the powers of the deputies, who would choose the premier, who +would choose the president, what would be the duties of each? Who can +explain why in France and England the executive is responsible to the +parliament and must answer its questions, while in the United States the +executive is an autocrat, responsible to no one for four years? Who +could have foreseen that in England, supposed to remain a monarchy, the +constitution would be fluid; while in America, supposed to be a +democracy, the constitution would be rigid, and the supreme power of +rejecting changes in the laws would be vested in a group of reactionary +lawyers appointed for life? There will be similar surprises in the +social revolution, and similar differences between what things pretend +to be and what they are. + +I used to compare the social revolution to the hatching of an egg. You +examine it, and apparently it is all egg; but then suddenly something +begins to happen, and in a few minutes it is all chicken. If, however, +you investigate, you discover that the chicken had been forming inside +the egg for some time. I know that there is a chicken now forming inside +our social egg; but having realized the complexity of social phenomena, +I no longer venture to predict the exact time of the hatching, or the +size and color of the chicken. + +Perhaps it is more useful to compare the social revolution to a +child-birth. A good surgeon knows what is due to happen, but he knows +also that there are a thousand uncertainties, a thousand dangerous +possibilities, and all he can do is to watch the process and be prepared +to meet each emergency as it arises. The birth process consists of one +pang after another, but no one can say which pang will complete the +birth, or whether it will be completed at all. Karl Marx is author of +the saying that "force is the midwife of progress," so you may see that +I am not the inventor of this simile of child-birth. + +There are three factors in the social revolution, each of which will +vary in each country, and in different parts of the country, and at +different periods. First, there is the industrial condition of the +country, a complex set of economic factors. The industrial life of +England depends primarily on shipping and coal. In the United States +shipping is of less importance, and railroads take the place. In the +United States the eastern portion lives mainly by manufacture, the +western by agriculture, while the south is held a generation behind by a +race problem. In France the great estates were broken up, and +agriculture fell into the hands of peasant proprietors, who are the main +support of French capitalism. In Prussia the great estates were held +intact, and remained the basis of a feudal aristocracy. In America land +changes hands freely, and therefore one-third of our farms are +mortgaged, and another third are worked by tenants. In Russia there was +practically no middle class, while in the United States there is +practically nothing but middle class; the rich have been rich for such a +short while that they still look middle class and act middle class, in +spite of all their efforts, while the working class hopes to be middle +class and is persuaded that it can become middle class. Such varying +factors produce in each country a different problem, and make inevitable +a different process of change. + +The second factor is the condition of organization and education of the +workers. This likewise varies in every country, and in every part of +every country. There is a continual struggle on the part of the workers +to organize and educate themselves, and a continual effort on the part +of the ruling class to prevent this. In some industries in America you +find the workers one hundred per cent organized, and in other industries +you find them not organized at all. It is obvious that in the former +case the social change, when it comes, will be comparatively simple, +involving little bloodshed and waste; in the latter case there will be +social convulsions, rioting and destruction of property, disorganization +of industry and widespread distress. + +The third factor is the state of mind of the propertied classes, the +amount of resistance they are willing to make to social change. I have +done a great deal of pleading with the masters of industry in my +country; I have written appeals to Vincent Astor and John D. +Rockefeller, to capitalist newspapers and judges and congressmen and +presidents. I have been told that this is a waste of my time; that these +people cannot learn and will not learn, and that it is foolish to appeal +either to their hearts or their understanding. But I perceive that the +class struggle is like a fraction; it has a numerator and a denominator, +and you can increase the fraction just as well by decreasing the +denominator as by increasing the numerator. To vary the simile, here are +two groups of men engaged in a tug of war, and you can affect the result +just as decisively by persuading one group to pull less hard, as by +persuading the other group to pull harder. + +Picture to yourself two factories. In factory number one the owner is a +hard-driving business man, an active spirit in the so-called "open-shop" +campaign. He believes in his divine right to manage industry, and he +believes also in the gospel of "all that the traffic will bear." He +prevents his men from organizing, and employs spies to weed out the +radicals and to sow dissensions. When a strike comes, he calls in the +police and the strike-breaking agencies, and in every possible way he +makes himself hated and feared by his workers. Then some day comes the +unemployment crisis, and a wave of revolt sweeping over the country. The +workers seize that factory and set up a dictatorship of the proletariat +and a "red terror." If the owner resists, they kill him; in any case, +they wipe out his interest in the business, and do everything possible +to destroy his power over it, even to his very name. They run the +business by a shop committee, and you have for that particular factory a +Syndicalist, or even Anarchist form of social reconstruction. + +Now for factory number two, whose owner is a humane and enlightened man, +studying social questions and realizing his responsibility, and the +temporary nature of his stewardship. He gives his people the best +possible working conditions, he keeps open books and discusses wages and +profits with them, he educates the young workers, he meets with their +union committees on a basis of free discussion. When the unemployment +crisis comes and the wave of revolt sweeps the country, this man and his +workers understand one another. He says: "I can no longer pay profits, +and so I can no longer keep going under the profit system; but if you +are ready to run the plant, I am ready to help you the best I can." +Manifestly, this man will continue the president of the corporation, and +if he trains his sons wisely, they will keep his place; so, instead of +having in that factory a dictatorship and a terror, you will have a +constitutional monarchy, gradually evolving into a democratic republic. + + + + +CHAPTER LXVI + +CONFISCATION OR COMPENSATION + + (Shall the workers buy out the capitalists? Can they afford to do + it, and what will be the price?) + + +The problem of whether the social revolution shall be violent or +peaceable depends in great part upon our answer to the question of +confiscation versus compensation. We are now going to consider, first, +the abstract rights and wrongs of the question, and, second, the +practical aspects of it. + +There is a story very popular among single taxers and other advocates of +freedom of the land. An English land-owner met a stranger walking on his +estate, and rebuked him for trespassing. Said the stranger, "You own +this land?" Said the other, "I do." "And how did you get it?" "I +inherited it from my father." "And how did your father get it?" "He +inherited it from his father." So on for half a dozen more ancestors, +until at last the Englishman answered, "He fought for it." Whereupon the +stranger took off his coat and rolled up his sleeves and said, "I'll +fight you for it." + +This is all there is to say on the subject of the abstract rights of +land titles. There is no title to land which is valid on a historical +basis. Everything rests upon fraud and force, continued through endless +ages of human history. We in the United States took most of our land +from the Indians, and in the process our guiding rule was that the only +good Injun was a dead Injun. We first helped the English kings to take +large sections of our country from the French and Spanish, and then we +took them from the English king by a violent revolution. We purchased +our Southwestern states from Mexico, but not until we had taken the +precaution of killing some thousands of Mexicans in war, which had the +effect of keeping down the purchase price. It would be a simple matter +to show that all public franchises are similarly tainted with fraud. +Proudhon laid down the principle that "property is theft," and from this +principle it is an obvious conclusion that society has the right to +scrap all paper titles to wealth, and to start the world's industries +over again on the basis of share and share alike. + +But stop and consider for a moment. "Property is theft," you say. But go +to your corner grocery, and tell the grocer that you deny his title to +the sack of prunes which he exhibits in front of his counter. He will +tell you that he has paid for them; but you answer that the prunes were +raised on stolen land, and shipped to him over a railroad whose +franchise was obtained by bribery. Will that convince the grocer? It +will not. Neither will it convince the policeman or the judge, nor will +it convince the voters of the country. Most people have a deeply rooted +conviction that there are rights to property now definitely established +and made valid by law. If you have paid taxes on land for a certain +period, the land "belongs" to you; and I am sure you might agitate from +now to kingdom come without persuading the American people that New +Mexico ought to be returned to Mexico, or the western prairies to the +Indian tribes. + +Such are the facts; now let us apply them to the right of exploitation, +embodied in the ownership of a certain number of bonds or shares of +stock in the United States Steel Corporation. "Pass a law," says the +Socialist, "providing for the taking over of United States Steel by the +government." At once to every owner comes one single thought--are you +going to buy this stock, or are you going to confiscate it? If you +attempt confiscation, the courts will declare the law unconstitutional; +and you either have to defy the courts, which is revolutionary action, +or to amend the constitution. If you adopt the latter course, you have +before you a long period of agitation; you have to carry both houses of +Congress by a two-thirds majority, and the legislatures of three-fourths +of the States. You have to do this in the face of the most bitter and +infuriated opposition of those who are defending what they regard as +their rights. You have to meet the arguments of the entire capitalist +press of the country, and you have the certainty of widespread bribery +of your elected officials. + +The prospect of doing all this under the forms of law seems extremely +discouraging; so come the Syndicalists, saying, "Let us seize the +factories, and stop the exploitation at the point of production." So +come the Communists, saying, "Let us overthrow capitalist government, +and break the net of bourgeois legality, and establish a dictatorship of +the proletariat, which will put an end to privilege and class domination +all at once." What are we to say to these different programs? + +Suppose we buy out the stockholders of United States Steel, and issue +to them government bonds, what have we accomplished? Nothing, say the +advocates of confiscation; we have changed the form of exploitation, but +the substance of it remains the same. The stockholders get their money +from the United States government, instead of from the United States +Steel Corporation; but they get their money just the same--the product, +not of their labor, but of the labor of the steel workers. Suppose we +carried out the same procedure all along the line; suppose the +government took over all industries, and paid for their securities with +government bonds. Then we should have capitalism administered by a +capitalist government, instead of by our present masters of industry; we +should have a state capitalism, instead of a private capitalism; we +should have the government buying and selling products, and exploiting +labor, and paying over the profits to an hereditary privileged class. +The capitalist system would go on just the same, except that labor would +have one all-powerful tyrant, instead of many lesser tyrants, as at +present. + +So argue the advocates of confiscation. And the advocates of purchase +reply that in buying the securities of United States Steel, we should +fix the purchase price at the present market value of the property, and +that price, once fixed, would be permanent; all future unearned +increment of the steel industry would belong to the government instead +of to private owners. Consider, for example, what happened during the +world war. When I was a boy, soon after the Steel Trust was launched, +its stock was down to something like six dollars, and I knew small +investors who lost every dollar they had put in. But during the war, +steel stock soared to a hundred and thirty-six dollars per share; it +paid dividends of some thirty per cent per year, and accumulated +enormous surpluses besides. + +The same thing was true of practically all the big corporations. +According to Secretary of the Treasury McAdoo, there were coal companies +which paid as high as eight hundred per cent per year; that is to say, +the profits in one year were eight times the total investment. Assuming +that our government bonds paid five per cent, it appears that the owners +of these coal companies got one hundred and sixty times as much under +our present private property system as they would have got under a +system of state purchase. Even completely dominated by capitalism as our +courts are today, they would not dare require us to pay for industries +more than six per cent on the market value of the investment; and from +what I know of the inside graft of American big business that would be +restricting the private owners to less than one-fourth of what they are +getting at present. + +We have already pointed out the economies that can be made by putting +industry under a uniform system. But all these, important as they are, +amount to little in comparison with the one great consideration, which +is that by purchasing large scale industry, we should break the "iron +ring"; we should thenceforth be able to do our manufacturing for use +instead of for profit, and so we should put an end to unemployment. Our +cheerful workers would throng into the factories, to produce for +themselves instead of for masters; and in one year of that we should so +change the face of our country that a return to the system of private +ownership would be unthinkable. In one year we could raise production to +such a point that the interest on the bonds we had issued would be like +the crumbs left over from a feast. + + + + +CHAPTER LXVII + +EXPROPRIATING THE EXPROPRIATORS + + (Discusses the dictatorship of the proletariat, and its chances for + success in the United States.) + + +I am aware that the suggestion of paying for the industries we socialize +will sound tame and uninspiring to a lot of ardent young radicals of my +acquaintance. They will shake their heads sadly and say that I am +getting middle-aged and tired. We have seen in Russia and Hungary and +other places, so many illustrations of the quick and easy way to +expropriate the expropriators that now there is in every country a +considerable group of radicals who will hear to no program less +picturesque than barricades and councils of action. + +In considering this question, I set aside all considerations of abstract +right or wrong, the justification for violence in the overthrow of +capitalist society. I put the question on the basis of cash, pure and +simple. It will cost a certain amount of money to buy out the owners, +and that money will have to be paid, as it is paid at present, out of +the labor of the useful workers. The workers don't want to pay any more +than they have to; the question they must consider is, which way will +they have to pay most. The advocates of the dictatorship of the +proletariat are lured by the delightful prospect of not having to pay +anything; and if that were really possible it would undoubtedly be the +better way. But we have to consider this question: Is the program of not +having to pay anything a reality, or is it only a dream? Suppose it +should turn out that we have to pay anyhow, and that in the case of +violent revolution we pay much more, and in addition run serious risk of +not getting what we pay for? + +Here are enormous industries, running at full blast, and it is proposed +that some morning the workers shall rise up and seize them, and turn out +the owners and managers, and run the industries themselves. Will anybody +maintain that this can be done without stopping production in those +factories for a single day? Certainly production must stop during the +time you are fighting for possession; and the cruel experience of +Russia proves that it will stop during the further time you are fighting +to keep possession, and to put down counter-revolutionary conspiracies. +Also, alas, it will stop during the time you are looking for somebody +who knows how to run that industry; it will stop during the time you are +organizing your new administrative staff. You may discover to your +consternation that it stops during the time you are arranging to get +other industries to give you credit, and to ship you raw materials; also +during the time you are finding the workers in other industries who want +your product, and are able to pay for it with something that you can +use, or that you can sell in a badly disorganized market. + +And all the time that you are arranging these things, you are going to +have the workers at your back, not getting any pay, or being paid with +your paper money which they distrust, and growling and grumbling at you +because you are not running things as you promised. You see, the mass of +the workers are not going to understand, because you haven't made them +understand; you have brought about the great change by your program of a +dictatorship, of action by an "enlightened minority"; and now you have +the terror that the unenlightened majority may be won back by their +capitalist masters, and may kick you out of control, or even stand you +up against a wall and shoot you by a firing squad. And all the time you +are worrying over these problems, who can estimate the total amount the +factory might have been producing if it had been running at full blast? +Whatever that difference is, remember, it is paid by the workers; and +might that sum not just as well have been used to buy out the owners? + +If we were back in the old days of hand labor and crude, unorganized +production, I admit that the only way to benefit the slaves might be to +turn out the masters by force. But here we have a social system of +infinite complexity, a delicate and sensitive machine, which no one +person in the world, and no group of persons understands thoroughly. In +the running of such a machine a slight blunder may cost a fortune; and +certainly all the skill, all the training, all the loyal services of our +expert engineers and managers is needed if we are to remodel that +machine while keeping it running. The amount of wealth which we could +save by the achieving of that feat would be sufficient to maintain a +class of owners in idleness and luxury for a generation; and so I say, +with all the energy and conviction I possess, _pay them_! Pay them +anything that is necessary, in order to avoid civil war and social +disorganization! Pay them so much that they can have no possible cause +of complaint, that the most hide-bound capitalistic-minded judge in the +country cannot find a legal flaw in the bargain! Pay them so that every +engineer and efficiency expert and manager and foreman and stenographer +and office-boy will stay on the job and work double time to put the +enterprise through! Pay them such a price that even Judge Gary and John +D. Rockefeller will be willing to help us do the job of social +readjustment! + +"Ah, yes," my young radical friends will say, "that sounds all very +beautiful, but it's the old Utopian dream of brotherhood and class +co-operation. That will never happen on this earth, until you have first +abolished capitalism." My answer is, it could happen tomorrow if we had +sufficient intelligence to make it happen. That it does not happen is +simply absence of intelligence. And will anyone maintain that it is the +part of an intelligent man to advocate a less intelligent course than he +knows? What is the use of our intelligence, if we abdicate its +authority, and give ourselves up to programs of action which we know are +blind and destructive and wasteful? We may see a great vessel going on +the rocks; we may feel certain that it is going, in spite of everything +we can do; but shall we fail to do what we can to make those in the +vessel realize how they might get safely into the harbor? + +We have had the Russian revolution before us for four years. Mankind +will spend the next hundred years in studying it, and still have much to +learn, but the broad outlines of the great experiment are now plain +before our eyes. Russia was a backward country, and she tried to fight a +modern war, and it broke her down. She had practically no middle class, +and her ruling class was rotten, and so the revolutionists had their +chance, and they seized it. Perhaps it would be more correct to say that +they came to the rescue of Russia, saving her from the hands of those +who were trying to force her to fight, when she was utterly exhausted +and incapable of fighting. + +Anyhow, here was your dictatorship of the proletariat. It turned out all +the executive experts, or nearly all of them, because they were tainted +with the capitalist psychology; and then straightway it had to call them +back and make terms with them, because industry could not be run without +them. And of course these engineers and managers sabotaged the +revolution--every non-proletarian sabotaged it, both inside Russia and +outside. You denounced this, and protested against this, but all the +same it happened; it was human nature that it should happen, and it is +one of the things you have to count on, in any and every country where +you attempt the social revolution by minority action. + +They have got power in Russia, and they dream of getting power in +America in the same way. But there is no such disorganization in our +country as there was in Russia, and it would take a generation of civil +strife to bring us to such a condition. We have a middle class, +powerful, thoroughly organized, and thoroughly conscious. Moreover, this +class has ideals of majority rule, which are bred in its very bones; and +while they have never realized these ideals, they think they have, and +they are prepared to fight to the last gasp in that belief. All that the +leaders of Moscow have to do is to bring about an attempt at forcible +revolution, and they will discover in American society sufficient power +of organization and of brutal action to put their movement out of +business for a generation. + +A hundred years ago we had chattel slavery firmly fixed as the +industrial system of one-half of these United States. To far-seeing +statesmen it was manifest that chattel slavery was a wasteful system, +and that it could not exist in competition with free labor. There was a +great American, Henry Clay, who came forward with a proposition that the +people of the United States, through their government, should raise the +money, about a billion dollars, and compensate the owners of all the +slaves and set them free. For most of his lifetime Henry Clay pleaded +for that plan. But the masters of the South were making money fast; they +knew how to handle the negro as a slave, they could not imagine handling +him as a free laborer, and they would not hear to the plan. On the other +side of Mason and Dixon's line were fanatical men of "principle," who +said that slavery was wrong, and that was the end of it. There is a +stanza by Emerson discussing this question of confiscation versus +compensation: + + Pay ransom to the owner + And fill the bag to the brim. + Who is the owner? The slave is owner, + And ever was. Pay him. + +This, you see, is magnificent utterance, but as economic philosophy it +is reckless and unsound. The abolitionists of the North took up this +poem, and the slave power of the South answered with a battle-song: + + War to the hilt, + Theirs be the guilt, + Who fetter the freeman to ransom the slave! + +And so the issue had to be fought out. It cost a million human lives and +five billions of treasure, and it set American civilization back a +generation. And now we confront exactly the same kind of emergency, and +are coming to exactly the same method of solution. We have white +wage-slaves clamoring for their freedom, and we have business men making +money out of them, and exercising power over them, and finding it +convenient and pleasant. They are going to fight it out in a civil war, +and which side is going to win I am not sure. But when the historians +come to write about it a couple of generations from now, let them be +able to record that there were a few men in the country who pleaded for +a sane and orderly and human solution of the problem, and who continued +to voice their convictions even in the midst of the cruel and wasteful +strife! + + + + +CHAPTER LXVIII + +THE PROBLEM OF THE LAND + + (Discusses the land values tax as a means of social readjustment, + and compares it with other programs.) + + +The writer of this book has been watching the social process for twenty +years, trying to figure out one thing--how the change from competition +to co-operation can be brought about with the minimum of human waste. He +has come to realize that the first step is a mental one; to get the +people to want the change. That means that the program must be simple, +so that the masses can understand it. As a social engineer you might +work out a perfect plan, but find yourself helpless, because it was hard +to explain. As illustration of what I mean, I cite the single tax, a +theory which has a considerable hold in America, but which politically +has been utterly ineffective. + +A few years ago a devoted enthusiast in Southern California, Luke North, +started what he called the "Great Adventure" to set free the idle land. +In the campaign of 1918 I gave my help to this movement, and when it +failed I went back and took stock, and revised my conclusions concerning +the single tax. Theoretically the movement has a considerable percentage +of right on its side. Land, in the sense that single taxers use it, +meaning all the natural sources of wealth, is certainly an important +basis of exploitation, and if you were to tax land values to the full +extent, you would abolish a large portion of privilege--just how large +would be hard to figure. I was perfectly willing to begin with that +portion, so I helped with the "Great Adventure." But a practical test +convinced me that it could never persuade a majority of the people. + +The single tax proposal is to abolish all taxes except the tax on land +values. Then come the associations of the bankers and merchants and real +estate speculators, crying in outraged horror, "What? You propose to let +the rich man's stocks and bonds go free? You propose to put no tax on +his cash in the vaults and on his wife's jewels? You propose to abolish +the income tax and the inheritance tax, and put all the costs of +government on the poor man's lot?" + +Now, of course, I know perfectly well that the rich man dodges most of +his income tax and most of his inheritance tax. I know that he pays a +nominal pittance on his cash in the bank and on his wife's jewels, and +likewise on his stocks and bonds. I know that the corporations issuing +these stocks and bonds would be far more heavily hit by a tax on the +natural resources they own; they could not evade this tax, and they know +it, and that is why they are moved to such deep concern for the fate of +the poor man and his lot. I know that the tax on the poor man's lot +would be infinitesimal in comparison with the tax on the great +corporation. But how can I explain all this to the poor man? To +understand it requires a knowledge of the complexities of our economic +system which the voters simply have not got. + +How much easier to take the bankers and speculators at their word! To +answer, "All right, gentlemen, since you like the income and inheritance +taxes, the taxes on stocks and bonds and money and jewels, we will leave +these taxes standing. Likewise, we assent to your proposition that the +poor man should not pay taxes on his lot, while there are rich men and +corporations in our state holding twenty million acres of land out of +use for purposes of speculation. We will therefore arrange a land values +tax on a graduated basis, after the plan of the income tax; we will +allow one or two thousand dollars' worth of land exempt from all +taxation, provided it is used by the owner; and we will put a graduated +tax on all individuals and corporations owning a greater quantity of +land, so that in the case of individuals and corporations owning more +than ten thousand dollars' worth of land, we will take the full rental +value, and thus force all idle land into the market." + +Now, the provision above outlined would have spiked every single +argument used by the opposition to the "Great Adventure" in California +in 1918; it would have made the real intent of the measure so plain as +to win automatically the additional votes needed to carry the election. +But I tried for three years, without being able to persuade a single one +of the "Great Adventure" leaders to recognize this plain fact. The +single taxer has his formula, the land values tax and no other tax, and +all else is heresy. Actually, the president of a big single tax +organization in the East declared that by the advocacy of my idea I had +"betrayed the single tax!" We may take this as an illustration of the +difference between dogmatism and science in the strategy of the class +struggle. + +I first suggested my program immediately after the war, with the +provision that the land thrown on the market should be purchased by the +state, and used to establish co-operative agricultural colonies for the +benefit of returned soldiers. But we have preferred to have our returned +soldiers stay without work, or to displace the men and women who had +been gallantly "doing their bit." By this means we soon had five million +men out of work, and many other millions bitterly discontented with +their wages. Again I took up the proposition for a graduated land tax, +with the suggestion that the money should be used to provide a pension, +first for every dependent man or woman over sixty years of age in the +country, and second for every child in the country whose parents were +unable properly to support it, whether because they were dead or sick or +unemployed. + +You may note that in advocating this program, you would not have to +convert anybody to any foreign theories, nor would you have to use any +long words; you would not have to say anything against the constitution, +nor to break any law, nor to give occasion for patriotic mobs to tar and +feather you. To every poor man in your state you could say, "If you own +your own house and lot, this bill will lift the taxes from both, and +therefore it will mean fifty or a hundred dollars a year in your pocket. +If you do not own a home, it will take millions of idle acres out of the +hands of the speculators, and break the price of real estate, so that +you can have either a lot in the city or a farm in the country with +ease." + +Furthermore, you could say, "This measure will have the effect of +drawing the unemployed from the cities at once, and so stopping the +downward course of wages. At the same time that wages hold firm, the +cost of food will go down, because there will be millions more men +working on the land. In addition to that, the state will have an +enormous income, many millions of dollars a year, taken exclusively from +those who are owning and not producing. This money will be expended in +saving from suffering and humiliation the old people of the country, who +have worked hard all their lives and have been thrown on the scrap-heap; +also in making certain that every child in the country has food enough +and care enough to make him into a normal and healthy human being, so +that he can do his share of work in the world and pay his own way +through life." + +I submit the above measure to those who believe that the road to social +freedom lies by some sort of land tax. But before you take it up I +invite you to consider whether there may not be some other way, even +easier. There is a homely old saying to the effect that "molasses +catches more flies than vinegar"; and I am always looking for some way +that will get the poor what they want, without frightening the rich any +more than necessary. + +I know a certain type of radical whom this question always exasperates. +He answers that the opposition will be equally strong to any plan; the +rich will do anything for the poor except get off their backs--and so +on. In reply I mention that among the most ardent radicals I know are +half a dozen millionaires; I know one woman who is worth a million, who +pleads day and night for social revolution, while the people who work +for her are devoted and respectful wage slaves. Herbert Spencer said +that his idea of a tragedy was a generalization killed by a fact. I +shall not say that the existence of millionaire Socialists and parlor +Bolsheviks kills the theory of the class struggle, but I certainly say +it compels us to take thought of the rich as well as of the poor in +planning the strategy of our campaign. + +And manifestly, if we want to consider the rich, the very last device we +shall use is that of a tax. Nobody likes to pay taxes; everybody agrees +in classifying taxes with death. Each feels that he is paying more than +his share already; each knows that the government which collects the tax +is incompetent or worse. Stop and recall what we have proven about the +"iron ring"; the possibilities of production latent in our society. +Realize the bearings of this all-important fact, that we can offer to +mankind a social revolution which will make everybody richer, instead of +making some people poorer! Exactly how to do this is the next thing we +have to inquire. + + + + +CHAPTER LXIX + +THE CONTROL OF CREDIT + + (Deals with money, the part it plays in the restriction of + industry, and may play in the freeing of industry.) + + +How is it that the rich are becoming richer? The single taxer answers +that it is by monopoly of the land, the natural sources of wealth; the +Socialist answers that it is by the control of the machinery of +production. But if you go among the rich and make inquiry, you speedily +learn that these factors, large as they are, amount to little in +comparison with another factor, the control of credit. There are hosts +of little capitalists and business men who deal in land and produce +goods with machinery, but the men who make the real fortunes and +dominate the modern world are those who control credit, and whose +business is, not the production of anything, but speculation and the +manipulation of markets. + +"Money makes the mare go," our ancestors used to say; and money today +determines the destiny of empires. What is money? We think of it as gold +and silver coins, and pieces of engraved paper promising to pay gold and +silver coins. But the report of the U. S. Comptroller of the Currency +for 1919 shows that the business of the country was done, 5% by such +means and 95 % by checks; so, for practical purposes, we may say that +money consists of men's willingness to trust other men, or groups or +organizations of men, when they make written promise to pay. In other +words, money is credit; and the control of credit means the control of +industry. The problem of social readjustment is mainly but the problem +of taking the control of credit out of the hands of private individuals, +and making it a public or social function. + +Who controls credit today? The bankers. And how do they control it? We +give it to them; we, the masses of the people, who take them our money +and leave it with them. A very little real money in hand becomes, under +our banking system, the basis of a great amount of imaginary money. The +Federal Reserve law requires that banks shall hold in reserve from +seven to thirteen per cent of demand deposits; which means, in +substance, that when you leave a dollar with a banker, the banker is +allowed, under the law, to turn that dollar into anywhere from seven to +thirteen dollars, and lend those dollars out. In addition, he deposits +his reserves with the Federal Reserve bank, and that bank keeps only +thirty-five per cent in reserve--in other words, the seven to thirteen +imaginary dollars are multiplied again by three. + +Under the stress of war, this process of credit inflation has been +growing like the genii let out of the bottle. Under the law, the Federal +Reserve banks are supposed to hold a gold reserve of 40% to secure our +currency. But in December, 1919, these banks held a trifle over a +billion dollars' worth of gold, while our paper money was over four +billion. In addition, our banks have over thirty-three billions of +deposits, and all these are supposed to be secured by gold; in addition, +there are twenty-five billions of government bonds, and uncounted +billions of private notes, bonds and accounts, all supposed to be +payable in gold. So it appears that about one per cent of our +outstanding money is real, and the rest is imaginary--that is, it is +credit. + +The point for you to get clear is this: The great mass of this imaginary +money is created by law, and we have the power to abolish it or to +change the ownership of it at any time we develop the necessary +intelligence. Let us consider the ordinary paper money, the one and two +and five and ten dollar "bills," with which we plain people do most of +our business. These are Federal Reserve notes, and there are about three +billions of them; how do they come to be? Why, we grant to the national +banks by law the right to make this money; the government prints it for +them, and they put it into circulation. And what does it cost them? They +pay one per cent for the use of the money; in some cases they pay only +one-half of one per cent; and then they lend it to us, the people--and +what do they charge us? The answer is available in a recent report of +the U. S. Comptroller of the Currency, as follows: + +"I have the record of the loans made by one Texas national bank to a +hard-working woman who owned a little farm a few miles from town. She +borrowed, in the aggregate, $2,375, making about thirty loans during the +year. Listen to the details of the robbery: $162.50 for 30 days at 36 +per cent; $377. for 34 days at 44 per cent; $620.25 for 23 days at 77 +per cent; $11. for 30 days at 120 per cent; $21.50 for 30 days at 90 +per cent; $33. for 2 days at 93 per cent; $27. for 15 days at 195 per +cent; $110. for 30 days at 120 per cent--that was to buy a horse for her +plowing; $20 for 48 days at 187 per cent; $6 for 10 days at 720 per +cent; $7 for 3 days at 2,000 per cent, and so on; every cent paid off by +what sweat and struggle only God knows." + +In Oklahoma, where the legal rate of interest is six per cent, with ten +per cent as the maximum under special contract, harassed farmers paid +all the way from 12 to 2400 per cent, with 40 per cent as the average. +In the case of one bank, the Comptroller proved that not a single +solitary loan had been made under fifteen per cent. He cited one +particular case that he asked to be regarded as typical. In the spring +the farmer went to the bank and arranged for a loan of $200. Out of his +necessity he was compelled to pay 55 per cent interest charge. Unable to +meet the note at maturity, he had to agree to 100 per cent interest in +order to get the renewal. The next renewal forced him up to 125 per +cent. For four years the thing went on, and all the drudgery of the +father and the mother and the six children could never keep down the +terrible interest or wipe out the principal. As a finish the bank +swooped down and sold him out; the wretched man, barefoot and hungry, +went to work clearing a swamp, caught pneumonia and died; the county +buried him, and neighbors raised a purse to send the widow and children +back to friends in Arkansas. + +This is the thing called the Money Trust in action, and this is the +power we have to take out of private control. It is our first job, and +all other jobs are in comparison hardly worth mentioning. How are we +going to do it? + +The farmers of North Dakota have shown one way. They took the control of +their state government into their own hands, and the most important and +significant thing they did was to start a public bank. The interests +fought them tooth and nail; not merely the interests of North Dakota, +not merely of the Northwest, but of the entire United States. They +fought them in the law courts, up to the United States Supreme Court, +which decided in favor of the people of North Dakota. Therefore, make +note of this vital fact--the most important single fact in the strategy +of the class struggle--every state can, under the constitution, have a +public bank; every city and town can have one, and no court can ever +forbid it! + +Therefore, I say to all Socialists, labor men and social reformers of +every shade and variety, nail at the top of your program of action the +demand for a public bank in your community, to take the control of +credit out of the hands of speculators and use it for the welfare of the +people. Make it your first provision that every dollar of public money +shall be deposited in this bank and every detail of public financing +handled by this bank; make it your second provision that the purpose of +this bank shall be to put all private banks out of business, and take +over their power for the people. + +At present, you understand, it is taken for granted that the first +purpose of the government is to foster the private credit system. Take, +for example, the postal savings bank. The private banks fought this for +a generation, and finally they allowed us to have it, on condition that +it should be turned into a device for collecting money for them. Our +postal bank turns over all its money to the private banks, at the +grotesque rate of two per cent interest; and recently I read of the +director of the postal bank appearing before a convention of bankers, +asking for some small favor, and humbly explaining that it was not his +idea to make the postal bank a rival of the private savings banks. Why +should he not do so? Let us nail it to our radical program that the +postal savings bank is to fight for business, just as do the private +banks, and lend its funds direct to the people on good security. + +Let our Federal banking system also become the servant of the public +welfare, and let its energy be devoted to breaking the strangle-hold of +predatory finance on our industry. Let the government issue all money, +and use it for the transfer of industry from private into public hands. +Do we want to socialize our railroads, our coal mines, our telegraphs +and telephones? Do we want to buy them, in order to avoid the wastes of +civil war and insurrection? We have agreed that we do; and here we have +the way of doing it. If the bankers can create, out of our willingness +to trust them, billions upon billions of imaginary money, then so can +we, the people of the United States, create money out of our willingness +to trust ourselves. And do not let anybody fool you for a single second +by talking about "fiat money" and "inflation of the currency." If you +are paying twice as much for everything as you did before the war, you +are paying it because the bankers have doubled the amount of money in +circulation--for that reason and that alone. That double money the +bankers own; the only question now to be decided is, who is to own the +double money that will be created tomorrow? + +Make note of the fact that it costs nothing to start a public bank. If +you want to put the steel trust out of business by competition, you have +several hundred thousand dollars worth of rolling mills and ore land to +buy; but the banks can be put out of business by nothing but a law. The +material parts of a bank, the white marble columns and bronze railings +and mahogany trimmings, are as nothing compared with the inner soul of a +bank, its control of the life-blood of your business and mine; and this +we can have for the taking. We can keep our own "credit"; instead of +sending it to Wall Street, where speculators use it to bleed us white, +we can set it to building up our own community, under the direction of +officials whom we select. Also, we can have our gigantic national bank, +controlling all our thirty-three billions of dollars of deposits, and +likewise the hundreds of billions of credit built upon them. + +The first time you suggest this plan to a banker or business man, you +will be told that increase of money by the government does not benefit +labor or the general consumer; "inflation of the currency" causes prices +to go up correspondingly. To this I will furnish an effective reply: +that at the same time the government issues new money, the government +will also fix prices; and then watch the face of your banker or business +man! If he is a man who can really think, and is not just repeating like +a parrot the formulas he has learned from others, he will perceive that +the combination of currency inflation and price-fixing would catch him +as the two parts of a nut-cracker catch a nut; and he will know that you +can take the meat out of him any time you please. He may argue that it +is not fair; but point out to him that it is exactly what the big banks +and the trusts have been doing to us right along--increasing the amount +of money in circulation, and at the same time raising the prices we pay +for goods, and so taking out the meat from us nuts! + +We have agreed that we do not mean to be unfair either to the banker or +the manufacturer; we are simply going to stop their being unfair to us. +We are going to convince them that their power to catch us in a +nut-cracker is forever at an end. We allow them six per cent on their +investments, and guarantee them this by turning over to them some of our +new money--that is, government bonds. When we have thoroughly convinced +them that they can't get any more, they will take these bonds and quit; +and thus simply, without violence or destruction of property, we shall +slide from our present system of commercial cannibalism into the new +co-operative commonwealth. + +We have had "cheap money" campaigns in the United States many times, and +as this book is written, it becomes evident that we are to have another. +Henry Ford is advocating the idea, and so is Thomas A. Edison. The +present writer would like to make plain that in supporting such a +program, he does it for one purpose, and one only--the taking over of +the industries by the community. The creation of state credit for that +purpose is the next step in the progress of human society; whereas the +creation of state credit for the continuance of the profit system is a +piece of futility amounting to imbecility. This distinction is +fundamental, and is the test by which to judge the usefulness of any new +program, and the intelligence of those who advocate it. + + + + +CHAPTER LXX + +THE CONTROL OF INDUSTRY + + (Discusses various programs for the change from industrial + autocracy to industrial democracy.) + + +The program of the railway workers for the democratic management of +their industry is embodied in the Plumb plan. You may learn about it by +addressing the weekly paper of the railway brotherhoods, which is called +"Labor," and is published in Washington, D. C. It appears that our +transportation industry can be at once socialized, because of a clause +in the constitution which gives the national government power over +"roads and communications." Through decades of mismanagement under the +system of private greed, the railroads have been brought to such a +financial condition that they will be forced into nationalization, +whenever we stop them from dipping their fingers into the public +treasury. + +Under the Plumb plan the government is to purchase the roads from their +present owners, paying with government bonds. The management is to be +under the control of a board consisting in part of representatives of +the government, and in part of the workers--this being a combination of +the methods of Socialism and Syndicalism. The same program can be +applied constitutionally to telegraphs and telephones, to interstate +trolley systems, express companies, oil pipe lines, and all other means +of interstate communication and distribution. + +The Plumb plan also deals with coal and steel and other great +industries. These could not be nationalized without a constitutional +amendment, but it appears that in the majority of the constitutions of +the states are provisions that all corporate charters are held subject +to the power of the legislature to amend, modify, or revoke the same. +That gives us a right to take over these corporations through state +action. The only preliminary is to elect state administrations which +will represent us, instead of representing the corporations. Also, most +state constitutions contain the provision that "no corporation shall +issue its stocks or bonds, except for money, labor, or property actually +received." The word "labor" gives the opening wedge for the Plumb plan. +The state can purchase these industries, giving bonds in exchange, and +can issue to the workers labor stock, which stock will carry part +control of the industry. + +Also, the railroad brotherhoods have started their own bank, in +Cleveland, Ohio, and it is proving an enormous success. Make note of +this point; every large labor union can have its own bank, to finance +its industries and its propaganda. Stop and consider how preposterous it +is that the five million organized workers of the United States should +deposit their hundreds of millions of savings in capitalist banks, to be +used to finance private undertakings which crush unions and hold labor +in bondage. Let every big labor union have its own building, its own +banking and insurance business, its own vacation camp in the country, +its own school for training its future leaders. Also, let every labor +council in every big city start a labor daily, to tell the workers the +truth and point the way to freedom. Let every farmers' organization +follow suit; and let these groups get together, to exchange their +products upon a co-operative basis. Already the railway men are +arranging with the farmers, to buy the farm products and distribute them +co-operatively; they are getting together with the clothing workers, to +have the latter make clothing for them, and with the shoe-workers to +make shoes. + +This is the co-operative movement, which has become the largest single +industry in Great Britain, and is the backbone of industrial democracy +and sound radicalism. It is spreading rapidly in America now. It is +taking the money of the people out of the control of the profit system, +and diverting it into channels of public service. It is training men to +believe in brotherhood instead of in greed. It is giving them business +experience, so that when the time comes the taking over of our +industrial machine will not have to be done by amateurs, but by men who +know what co-operation is, and how to make a success of it. + +This work will go on more rapidly yet when the workers have united +politically, and brought into power a government which will assist them +instead of assisting the bankers. A most interesting program for the +development of working-class financial credit is known as the "Douglas +plan," which is advocated by a London weekly, the "New Age," and is +explained in two books, called "Economic Democracy" and "Credit Power +and Democracy," by Douglas and Orage. This program is in brief that the +furnishing of credit shall become a function of organized labor, based +upon the fact that the true and ultimate basis of all credit is the +power of hand and brain labor to produce wealth. The labor unions, or +"guilds," shall pay the management of industry and pay capital for the +use of the industrial plant, and shall finance production and new +industrial development out of their "credit power," their ability to +promise production and to keep their promises. + +This "Douglas plan" seeks to break the Money Trust by the method of +Syndicalism. Another method of breaking it, through state regulation of +bank loans, you will find most completely set forth in an extremely able +book, "The Strangle Hold," by H. C. Cutting, an American business man, +whom you may address at San Lorenzo, California. Another method, +utilizing the third factor in industry, the consumer, is the method of +banking by consumers' unions. Such are the Raffeisen banks, widely known +in Germany, and a specimen of which exists in the single tax colony at +Arden, Delaware. Those who wish to know about the co-operative bank, or +other forms of co-operation, may apply to the Co-operative League of +America, 2 West 13th Street, New York, whose president is Dr. James P. +Warbasse. Information concerning public ownership may be had from the +Public Ownership League, 127 N. Dearborn Street, Chicago; also from the +Socialist party, 220 South Ashland Boulevard, Chicago, and from the +Bureau of Social Research of the Rand School of Social Science, New +York. + +Also, I ought to mention the very interesting plan for social +reconstruction set forth by Mr. King C. Gillette, inventor of the safety +razor. This plan you may find in your public library in two encyclopedic +volumes, "Gillette's Social Redemption," and "Gillette's World +Solution." The politician seeks to solve the industrial problem by means +of the state, and the labor leader seeks to solve it by the unions; it +is to be expected that Mr. Gillette, a capitalist, should seek to solve +it by means of the corporation. He points out that the modern "trust" is +the greatest instrument of production yet invented by man; and he asks +why the people should not form their own "trust," to handle their own +affairs, and to purchase and take over the industries from their present +private masters. It is interesting to note that Mr. Gillette's solution +is fully as radical and thorough-going as those of the State Socialists +or the Syndicalists. The "People's Corporation" which he projects and +plans some day to launch upon the world would be a gigantic "consumers' +union," whose "credit power" would speedily dominate and absorb all +other powers in modern society; it would make us all stockholders, and +give us our share of the benefits of social productivity. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXI + +THE NEW WORLD + + (Describes the co-operative commonwealth, beginning with its money + aspects; the standard wage and its variations.) + + +It has been indicated that the new society will be different in +different countries and in different parts of the same country, in +different industries and at different times. No one can predict exactly +what it will be, and anyone who tries to predict is unscientific. But +every man can work out his own ideas of the most economical and sensible +arrangements for a co-operative society, and in these final chapters I +set forth my ideas. + +One of the first things people ask is, "Will there be money in the new +society, or how will labor be rewarded and goods paid for?" I answer +that there will be money, and the business methods of the new society +will be so nearly the same as at present that in this respect you would +hardly realize there had been any change. The only difference will be +that in the new society you will be paid several times as much for your +labor; or, if you prefer to put it the other way, you will be able to +buy several times as much with your money. Why should we waste our time +working out systems of "credit-cards," when we already have a system in +the form of gold and silver coins and paper currency? Why should we +bother with "labor checks," when we have a banking and clearing-house +system, understood by everyone but the illiterate? The only difference +we shall make is that nobody can get gold and silver coins or paper +currency, except by performing labor to pay for them; nobody can have +money in the bank and draw checks against it, until he has rendered to +society an equivalent amount of service. + +When you have earned your money in the new world, you will spend it +wherever you please, and for whatever you please; the only difference +being that the price you pay will be the exact labor-cost of producing +that article, with no deduction for any form of exploitation. As I wrote +sixteen years ago in "The Industrial Republic," you will be able to get, +if you insist upon it, a seven-legged spider made of diamonds, and the +only question society will ask is, Have you performed services +equivalent to the material and labor necessary to the creating of that +unusual article of commerce? Of course, society won't put it to you in +that complicated formula; it will simply ask, "Have you got the price?" +Which, you observe, is exactly the question society asks you at present. + +The next thing that everybody wants to know is, "Shall we all be paid +the same wages?" I answer, yes and no, because there will be three +systems of payment. There will be a basic wage, which everybody will get +for every kind of useful service necessary to production; this will be, +as it were, the foundation of our economic structure. On top of this +will be built a system of special payments for special services, which +are of an intellectual nature, and cannot be standardized and dealt with +wholesale. In addition, there will be for a time a third arrangement, +applying to agricultural work, which is in a different stage of +development, and to which different conditions apply. + +Let us take, first, our standard wage. The census of our Utopian +commonwealth reveals that we have ten million able-bodied workers +engaged in mining, manufacturing, and transportation; this including, of +course, office-work and management--everything that enters into these +industries. By scientific management, the best machinery, and the +elimination of all possible waste, we find that they produce eighty +million dollars worth of goods an hour. A portion of this we have to set +aside to pay for the raw materials which they do not produce, and for +the upkeep of the plant, and for margin of error--what our great +corporations call a surplus. We find that we have fifty million dollars +per hour left, and that means that we can pay for labor five dollars per +hour, or twenty dollars for the regular four-hour day. This is our +standard wage, received by all able-bodied workers. + +But quickly we find that our industries are not properly balanced. A +great many men want to work at the jobs which are clean and pleasant, +such as delivering mail, and very few want to work at washing dishes in +restaurants and cleaning the sewers. There is no way we can adjust this, +except by paying a higher wage, or by reducing the number of hours in +the working day, which is the same thing. The only other method would be +to have the state assign men to their work, and that would be +bureaucracy and slavery, the essence of everything we wish to get away +from in our co-operative commonwealth. + +What we shall have, so far as concerns our basic industries, is a +government department, registering with mathematical accuracy the +condition of supply and demand in all the industries of the country. Our +demand for shoes is increasing, for some reason or other; a thousand +more shoe-workers are needed, therefore the price of labor in the shoe +industry is increased five cents per day--or whatever amount will draw +that number of workers from other occupations. On the other hand, there +are too many people applying for the job of driving trucks, therefore we +reduce slightly the compensation for this work. There are more men who +want jobs in Southern California than in Alaska, therefore the payment +for the same grade of work in Alaska has to be higher. All this is not +merely speculation, it is not a matter of anybody's choice; it is an +automatic, self-adjusting system, subject to precise calculations. The +only change from our present system is from guesswork to exact +measurement. At present we do not know how many shoes our country will +require next season, neither do we know how many shoes are going to be +made, neither do we know how many people can make shoes, nor how many +would like to learn, nor how many would like to quit that job and take +to farming. It would be the simplest matter in the world to find out +these things--far simpler that it was to register all our possible +soldiers, and examine them physically and mentally, and train them and +feed them and ship them overseas to "can the Kaiser." + +Of course, we drafted the men for this war job; but in the new world +nobody is drafted for anything. It is any man's privilege to starve if +he feels like it; it is his privilege to go out into the mountains and +live on nuts and berries if he can find them. Nobody makes him go +anywhere, or makes him work at anything--unless, of course, he is a +convicted criminal. To the free citizen all that society has to say is, +if he buys any products, he must pay for those products with his own +labor, and not with some other man's labor. Of course, he may steal, or +cheat, as under capitalism; our new world has laws against stealing and +cheating, and does its best to enforce them. The difference between the +capitalist world and our world is merely that we make it impossible for +any man to get money _legally_ without working. + +Under these conditions the average man wishes to work, and the only +question remaining is, how shall he work? If he wants to work by +himself, and in his own way, nobody objects to it. He is able to buy +anything he pleases, whether raw materials or finished products. If he +wants to buy leather and make shoes after his own pattern, no one stops +him, and if he can find anyone to buy these shoes, he can earn his +living in that way. He is able to get land for as long a time as he +wants it, by paying to the state the full rental value of that land, and +if he wants to farm the land, he can do so, and sell his products. As a +matter of theory, he is perfectly free to hire others to farm the land +for him, or with him. There is no law to prevent it, neither is there +any law to prevent his renting a factory and buying machinery, and +hiring labor to make shoes. + +But, as a matter of practical fact, it is impossible for him to do this, +because the community is in the business of making shoes, and on an +enormous scale, with great factories run democratically by the workers, +and there is very small chance of any private business man being able to +draw the workers away from these factories. The community factories have +all the latest machinery; they apply the latest methods of scientific +management, and they turn out standard shoes at such a rate that private +competition is unthinkable. Of course, there may be some special kind of +shoes, involving an intellectual element, in which there can be private +competition. This kind of manufacture is covered in our second method of +payment; but before we discuss it, let us settle the problem of our most +important basic industry, which is agriculture. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXII + +AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION + + (Discusses the land in the new world, and how we foster + co-operative farming and co-operative homes.) + + +Farming the land is a very ancient industry, and while its tools have +been improved, its social forms have been the same for a long time. The +worker on the land is conservative, and the Russian Bolsheviks, who +tried to rush their peasants into Communism, found that they had only +succeeded in stopping the production of food. We make no such blunder in +our new society. We have found a way to abolish speculation in land, and +exploitation based on land-ownership, while leaving the farmer free to +run his business in the old way if he wants to. + +In our new society we take the full rental value of all land which is +not occupied and used by the state. The farmer and the city dweller +alike "own" their land, in the sense that they have the use of it for as +long as they please, but they pay to the state the rental value of the +land, minus the improvements. So they cannot speculate in the land or +rent it out to others; they can only use it, and they only pay for what +they actually use. They may put improvements on the land, with full +assurance of having the use and benefit thereof, and they may sell the +improvements, and the new owner enters into possession, with no +obligation but to pay the rental value of the unimproved land to the +state. + +The farmer goes on raising his products, and if he wants to drive to +town and deliver them to his customers, he may do so; but he finds it +cheaper to market them through the great labor co-operatives and state +markets. As there is no longer any private interest involved in these +activities, no one has any interest in cheating him, and he gets the +full value of the products, less the cost of marketing. If the farmer +wishes to continue all his life in his old style individualistic method +of working the land, he is free to do so. But here is what he sees going +on within a few miles of his place: + +The state has bought a square mile of land, and has taken down the +fences and established an agricultural co-operative for purposes of +experiment and demonstration. The farm is run under the direction of +experts; the soils are treated with exactly the right fertilizers for +each crop, the best paying crops are raised, the best seed is used, and +the best machinery. The workers of this new agricultural co-operative +receive the standard wage, and they live in homes specially built for +them, with all the conveniences made possible by wholesale production. +Also, these co-operators live in a democratic community; they determine +their own conditions of labor, being represented on the governing board, +along with the experts appointed by the state. + +The farmer watches this experiment, at first with suspicion; but he +finds that his sons have less suspicion than he has, and his sons keep +pointing out to him that their little farm is not making the standard +wage or anything like it; and, moreover, the standard wage is constantly +increasing, whereas, the price of farm-products is dropping. And here is +the state, ready to direct new co-operative ventures, inviting a score +of farmers in the community to combine and buy out the unwilling ones, +and establish a new co-operative. Sooner or later the old farmer gives +way; or he dies, and his sons belong to the new world. + +So ultimately we have our national agricultural system, in which all the +requirements of our people are studied, and all the possibilities of our +soil and climate, and the job of raising the exact quantities of food +that we need, both for our own use and for export, is worked out as one +problem. We know how much lumber we need, and we raise it on all our +hillsides and mountain slopes, and so protect ourselves from floods and +the denuding of our continent. We know where best to raise our wheat, +and where best to raise our potatoes and our cabbages, and we do not do +this by crude hand-labor, nor by the labor of women and children from +daybreak till dark. We have special machines that plant each crop, and +other machines that reap it or dig it out of the ground and prepare it +for market. + +A few days ago I read a discussion in the Chamber of Commerce of +Calcutta. Some one called attention to the wastes involved in the +current method of handling rubber. One consignment of rubber had been +sold more than three hundred separate times, and the cost of these +transactions amounted to three times the value of the rubber. This is +only one illustration, and I might quote a thousand. If you doubt my +figures as to the possibility of production in the new society, remind +yourself that a large percentage of the things you use have been bought +and sold many scores of times before you get them. Consider the cabbage, +for which you pay six or eight cents a pound in the grocery store, and +for which the farmer gets, say, half a cent a pound. + +In this new world the state has an enormous income, derived from its tax +on land values. It no longer has to send around men once a year to ask +you how many diamond rings your wife has, and to tax you on your +honesty, if you have any. It no longer has to make its money by such +lying devices as a tariff, therefore its moral being is no longer +poisoned by a tariff-lobby. It taxes every citizen for the right to use +that which nature created, and leaves free from taxation that which the +citizens' own labor created; this kind of taxation is honest, and fair +to all, because no one can evade it. The state uses the proceeds of this +land tax in the public services, the libraries and research laboratories +and information bureaus; in free insurance against fire and flood and +tempest; and in a pension to every member of society above the working +age of fifty-five, or below the working age of eighteen. Of course, the +state might leave it to every man to save up for his old age, but not +all men are this wise, and the state cannot afford to let the unwise +ones starve. It is more convenient for the state to figure that all men, +or nearly all, are going to be old, and to hold back some of their money +while they are young and strong, in the certainty that when they are +old, they will appreciate this service. Also the state takes care of the +sick and incapacitated, and the mentally or physically defective. But we +do not leave these latter loose in the world to reproduce their defects; +we have in our new world some sense of responsibility to the future, and +there is nothing to which we devote more effort than making certain that +nothing unsound or abnormal is allowed entrance into life. + +The problem of the care of children is a complicated one, and our new +society is in process of solving it. We look back on the old world in +which the having of children was heavily taxed, in the form of an +obligation to care for these children until they were old enough to +work. Then the parents were allowed to exploit the labor of the +children, so that among the very poor the raising of children was a +business speculation, like the raising of slaves or poultry. But in our +new world we consider the interest of the child, and of the society in +which that child is to be a citizen. We decide that this society must +have citizens, and that the raising of the future citizens is a work +just exactly as necessary and useful as the raising of a crop of +cabbages. Therefore, we pay a pension to all mothers while they are +raising and caring for children. At the same time we assert the right to +see that this money is wisely spent, and that the child is really cared +for. If it is neglected, we are quick to take it away from its parents, +and put it in one of our twenty-four-hour-a-day schools. + +We realize that the home is an ancient industry, even more ancient than +agriculture, and we do not try to socialize it all at once. But just as +we demonstrate to farmers that the individual farm does not pay, so we +demonstrate to mothers the wastefulness of the single laundry, the +single kitchen, the single nursery. We establish community laundries, +community kitchens, community nurseries, and invite our women to help in +these activities, and to learn there, under expert guidance, the +advantages of domestic co-operation. We convince them by showing better +results in the health and happiness of the children, and in the time and +strength of the mothers. So, little by little, we widen the field of +co-operative endeavor, and increase the total product of human labor and +the total enjoyment of human life. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXIII + +INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTION + + (Discusses scientific, artistic and religious activities, as a + superstructure built upon the foundation of the standard wage.) + + +Karl Kautsky, intellectual leader of the German Social-democracy, gives +in his book, "The Social Revolution," a useful formula as to the +organization of the future society. This formula is: "Communism in +material production, Anarchism in intellectual production." It will +repay us to study this statement, and see exactly what it means. + +Material production depends directly upon things; and as there is only a +limited quantity of things in the world, if any one person has more than +his share, he deprives some other person to that extent. So there have +to be strict laws concerning the distribution of material products. But +with intellectual things exactly the opposite is the case. There is no +limit in quantity, and any one person can have all he wants without +interfering with anybody else. Everybody in the world can perform a play +by Shakespeare, or play a sonata by Beethoven, and everybody can enjoy +it as much as he pleases without keeping other people from enjoying it +all they please. Also, material production can be standardized; we can +have great factories to turn out millions of boxes of matches, each +match like every other match, and the more alike they are the better. +But in intellectual affairs we want everyone to be different, or at +least we want everyone to be free to be different, and if some one can +become much better than the others, this is the most important kind of +production in the world, for he may make over our whole intellectual and +moral life. + +For the production of material things our new society has great +factories owned in common, and run by majority vote of the workers, and +we place the products of that factory at the disposal of all members of +society upon equal terms. That is our "Communism in material +production." On the other hand, in our intellectual production we leave +everybody free to live his own life, and to associate himself with +others of like aims, and we place as few restrictions as possible upon +their activities. This is the method of free association, or "Anarchism +in intellectual production." + +Our problem would be simple if material and intellectual production +never had to mingle. But, as it happens, every kind of intellectual +production requires a certain amount of material, and every kind of +material production involves an intellectual element. Therefore, our two +methods have to be combined, and we have a complex problem which we have +to solve in a variety of different ways, and upon which we must +experiment with open minds and scientific temper. + +First, let us take the intellectual elements involved in the production +of purely material things, such as matches and shoes and soap. Let us +take invention. Naturally, we do not want to go on making matches and +shoes and soap in the same old way forever. On the contrary, we want to +stimulate all the workers in these industries to use their wits and +improve the processes in every possible way. The whole of society has an +interest in this, and the soap workers have an especial interest. Our +soap industry has an invention department, with a group of experts +appointed by the executive committee of the national council of soap +workers. All soap workers are taxed, say five cents a day, for the +support of this activity. Likewise the state contributes a generous sum +out of its income toward the work of soap research. In addition to this, +the soap industry offers prizes and scholarships for suggestions as to +the improvement of every detail of the work, and at meetings of every +local of soap workers somebody makes new suggestions as to methods of +stimulating their intellectual life--not merely as regards soap, but as +regards citizenship, and art and literature, and human life in general. +Our soap workers, you must understand, are no longer wage-slaves, +brutalized by toil and poverty; they are free citizens of a free +society. Our soap workers' local in every city has its own theatre and +concert hall and lecture bureau, and publishes its own magazine. + +Every industry has its immediate intellectual problems, its trade +journals in which these are discussed, and its research boards in which +they are worked out. The ambitions of the young workers in that industry +are concentrated upon getting into this intellectual part of their +trade. Examinations are held and tests are made to discover the most +competent men, and written suggestions are considered by boards of +control. It is, of course, of great importance to every worker that the +channels of promotion should be kept open, and that the man who really +has inventive talent shall get, not merely distinction and promotion, +but financial reward, so that he may have time and materials to continue +his experiments. + +This research department, you perceive, is a sort of superstructure, +built upon the foundation of our standard wage; and this same simile +applies to numerous other forms of intellectual production. For example, +our community paper mills turn out paper, and our community printers are +prepared to turn out millions of books. How shall we determine what is +to be the intellectual content of these material books? There are many +different methods. First, there is the method of individualism. A man +has something to say, and he writes a book; he works in the soap +factory, and saves a part of his standard wage, and when he has money +enough he orders the community printers to print his book, and the +community booksellers to handle it for him, and the community postoffice +to deliver it for him. Again, a group of men organize themselves into an +association, or club, or scientific society, and publish books. The +Authors' League takes up the work of publishing the writings of its +members, and the Poetry Society does the same. + +This is the method of Anarchism, or free association. But there is no +reason why we should not have along side it the method of Socialism; +there is no reason why we should not have state publishing houses, just +as we have state universities and state libraries. The state should +certainly publish standard works of all sorts, bibles and dictionaries +and directories, and cheap editions of the classics. In this new world +our school boards are not chosen by business men for purposes of graft, +they are chosen by the people to educate our children; so it seems to us +perfectly natural that the National Educational Association should +conduct a publication department, and order the printing of the school +books which the children use. + +In the same way, anyone is free to write a play, or to put on a play, +and invite people to come and see it. But, like the individual farmers +and the individual mothers of families, the play-producer in our society +is in competition with great community enterprises, which set a high +standard and make competition difficult. The same thing applies to the +opera, and to concerts, and to all the arts and sciences. You can start +a private hospital if you wish, but you will be in competition with +public institutions, and you can only succeed if you are a man of +genius--that is, if you have something to teach, too new and startling +for the public boards of control to recognize. You try your new method, +and it works, and that becomes a criticism of the public boards of +control, and before long the people by their votes turn out the old +board of control and put you in. + +That is politics, you say; but we in our new world do not use the word +politics as one of contempt. We really believe that public sentiment is +in the long run the best authority, and the appeal to public sentiment +is at once a social privilege and a social service. What we strive to do +is to clear the channels of appeal, and avoid favoritism and stagnation. +To that end we maintain, in every art and every science and every +department of human thought, endless numbers of centers of free, +independent, co-operative activity, so that every man who has an +inspiration, or a new idea, can find some group to support him or can +form a new group of his own. + +This is our "Anarchism in intellectual production," and it is the method +under which in capitalist society men organize all their clubs and +societies and churches. Devout members of the Roman Catholic Church will +be startled to be told that theirs is an Anarchist organization; but +nevertheless, such is the case. The Catholic Church owns a great deal of +property, and speculates in real estate, and to that extent it is a +capitalist institution. It holds a great many people by fear, and to +that extent it is a feudal institution. But in so far as members of the +church believe in it and love it and contribute of their free will to +its support, they are organizing by the method which all Anarchists +recommend and desire to apply to the whole of society. Anarchist clubs +and Christian churches are both free associations for the advocacy of +certain ideas, the only difference being in the ideas they advocate. + +In our new world such organizations have been multiplied many fold, and +form a vast superstructure of intellectual activity, built upon the +foundation of the standard wage. In this new world all the people are +free. They are free, not merely from oppression, but from the fear of +oppression; they have leisure and plenty, and they take part naturally +and simply in the intellectual life. The old, of course, have not got +over the dullness which a lifetime of drudgery impressed upon them, but +the young are growing up in a world without classes, and in which it +seems natural that everyone should be educated and everyone should have +ideas. They earn their standard wage, and devote their spare time to +some form of intellectual or artistic endeavor, and spend their spare +money in paying writers and artists and musicians and actors to +stimulate and entertain them. + +These latter are the ways of distinction in our new society; these are +the paths to power. The only rich men in our world are the men who +produce intellectual goods; the great artists, orators, musicians, +actors and writers, who are free to serve or not to serve, as they see +fit, and can therefore hold up the public for any price they care to +charge. Just now there is eager discussion going on in our world as to +whether it is proper for an opera singer, or a moving picture star, or a +novelist, to make a million dollars. Our newspapers are full of +discussions of the question whether anyone can make a million dollars +honestly, and whether men of genius should exploit their public. Some +point out that our most eminent opera singer spends his millions in +endowing a conservatory of art; but others maintain that it would be +better if he lowered his prices of admission, and let the public use its +money in its own way. The extremists are busy founding what they call +the Ten-cent Society, whose members agree to boycott all singers and +actors who charge more than ten cents admission, and all moving picture +stars who receive more than a hundred thousand dollars a year for their +service. These "Ten-centers" do not object to paying the money, but they +object to the commercializing of art, and declare especially that the +moral effect of riches is such that no rich person should ever, under +any circumstances, be allowed to influence the youth of the nation. In +this some of the greatest writers join them, and renounce their +copyrights, and agree to accept a laureateship from some union of +workers, who pay them a generous stipend for the joy and honor of being +associated with their names. The greatest poet of our time began life as +a newsboy, and so the National Newsvenders' Society has adopted him, and +taken his name, and pays him ten thousand dollars a year for the +privilege of publishing his works. + + + + +CHAPTER LXXIV + +MANKIND REMADE + + (Discusses human nature and its weaknesses, and what happens to + these in the new world.) + + +We have briefly sketched the economic arrangements of the co-operative +commonwealth. Let us now consider what are the effects of these +arrangements upon the principal social diseases of capitalism. + +The first and most dreadful of capitalism's diseases is war, and the +economic changes here outlined have placed war, along with piracy and +slavery, among the half-forgotten nightmares of history. We have broken +the "iron ring," and are no longer dependent upon foreign concessions +and foreign markets for the preservation of our social system and the +aggrandizement of a ruling class. We can stay quietly at home and do our +own work, and as we produce nearly everything we need, we no longer have +to threaten our neighbors. Our neighbors know this, and therefore they +do not arm against us, and we have no pretext to arm against them. We +take toward all other civilized nations the attitude which we have taken +toward Canada for the past hundred years. + +We have a small and highly trained army, a few regiments of which are +located at strategic points over the country. This army we regard and +use as we do our fire department. When there is widespread damage by +fire or flood or storm or earthquake, we rush the army to the spot to +attend to the work of rescue and rebuilding. Also, we have a small navy +in international service; for, of course, we are no longer an +independent and self-centered nation; we have come to realize that we +are part of the world community, and have taken our place as one state +in the International Socialist Federation. We send our delegates to the +world parliament, and we place our resources at the disposal of the +world government. However, it now takes but a small army and navy to +preserve order in the world. We govern the backward nations, but the +economic arrangements of the world are such that we are no longer driven +to exploit and oppress them. We send them teachers instead of soldiers, +and as there are really very few people in the world who fight for the +love of fighting, we have little difficulty in preserving peace. We pay +the backward peoples a fair price for their products which we need. Our +world government takes no money out of these countries, but spends it +for the benefit of those who live in the countries, to teach them and +train their young generations for self-government. + +Next, what are the effects of our new arrangements upon political +corruption and graft? The social revolution has broken the prestige of +wealth. Money will buy things, but it no longer buys power, the right to +rule other men; it no longer buys men's admiration. Everybody now has +money, and nobody is any longer afraid of starvation. It is no longer +the fashion to save money--any more than it is the fashion to carry +revolvers in drawing-rooms or to wear chain mail in place of +underclothing. So our political life is cleansed of the money influence. +People now get power by persuading their fellows, not by buying them or +threatening them. The world is no longer full of men ravenous for jobs, +and ready to sell their soul for a "position." So it is no longer +possible to build up a "machine" based on desire for office. + +The changes have resulted in an enormous intensification of our +political activities. We have endless meetings and debates; we have so +many propaganda societies that we cannot keep track of them. And some of +these societies, like the Catholic Church, have a large membership, and +large sums of money at their disposal. But a few experiments at carrying +elections by a "campaign-chest" have convinced everybody that to have +the facts on your side is the only permanent way to political power. Our +new society is jealous of attempts to establish any sort of ruling +class, and the surest way to discredit yourself is to advocate any form +of barrier against freedom of discussion, or the right of the people's +will to prevail. + +Next, what is the status of crime? We have too recently escaped from +capitalism to have been able to civilize entirely our slum population, +and we still have occasional crimes of violence, especially crimes of +passion. But we have almost entirely eliminated those classes of crime +which had to do with property, and we have discovered that this was +ninety-five per cent of all crime. We have eliminated them by the simple +device of making them no longer profitable. Anybody can go into our +community factories, and under clean and attractive working conditions, +and without any loss of prestige or social position, can earn the means +of satisfying his reasonable wants by three hours work a day. Almost +everybody finds this easier than stealing or cheating. + +But more important yet, as a factor in abolishing crime, is the +abolition of class domination and the prestige of wealth. We no longer +have in our community a ruling class which lives without working, and +which offers to the weak-minded and viciously inclined the perpetual +example of luxury. We no longer set much store on jewels and fine +raiment; we do not make costly things, except for public purposes, where +all may enjoy them; and nobody stores great quantities of money, because +everyone has a guarantee of security from the state. So we are gradually +putting our policemen and jailers and judges and lawyers to constructive +work. + +Next, what about disease? The diseases of poverty are entirely done away +with. We are now able to apply the knowledge of science to the whole +community, and so we no longer have to do with tuberculosis and typhoid, +or with rickets and anaemia in children, or with heavy infant mortality. +We have sterilized our unfit, the degenerates and the defectives, and so +do not have to reckon with millions of children from these wretched +stocks. We now give to the question of public health that prominence +which in the old days we used to give to war and the suppression of +crime and social protest. Our public health officers now replace our +generals and admirals, and we really obey their orders. + +Next, as to prostitution. Just as in the case of crime, we are still too +close to capitalism not to have among us the victims of social +depravity, both men and women. We still have a great deal of vice which +springs from untrained animal impulse, and we have some cultivated and +highly sophisticated pornography. But we have entirely done away with +commercial vice, and we have done it by cutting the root which nourished +it. Women in our communities are really free; and by that we do not mean +the empty political freedom which existed in the days of wage +slavery--we mean that women are permanently delivered from economic +inferiority, by the recognition on the part of the state of the money +value of their special kind of work, the bearing and training of +children. This kind of work not merely receives the standard wage, it +also receives the best surgical and nursing treatment free. Housework +and home-making are legally recognized services; and the woman before +marriage and after her children have been nursed is free to go into the +community factories and earn for herself the standard wage, with no loss +of social position. Consequently, no woman sells her sex, and no man +buys it. + +This does not mean, of course, that we have solved the sex problem in +our new society. There are two great social problems with which we have +to deal, the first of these being the sex problem, and the second the +race problem. Our scientists are occupied with eugenics, and we are +finding out how to guide our young people in marriage, so that our race +may be built up, and the ravages of capitalism remedied as quickly as +possible. Also we are trying to find out the laws of happiness and +health in love. We are founding societies for the purpose of protecting +love, and, as hinted in the Book of Love, we have a determined social +struggle between two groups of women--the mother-women and the +mistress-women--those who take love gravely, as a means of improving the +race, and those who take it as a decoration, a form of play. Our men are +embarrassed by having to choose between these groups, and occupy +themselves with trying to keep the struggle from turning into civil war. + +Second, the race problem. Our economic changes have, of course, done +away with some of the bitterest phases of this strife. White workingmen +in the North no longer mob and murder negro workingmen for taking their +jobs, and in the South our land values tax prevents the landlord from +exploiting either white or negro labor. But our white race is still +irresistibly bent upon preserving its integrity of blood, and the more +far-seeing among the negroes have come to realize that there can never +be any real happiness for them in a society where they are denied the +higher social privileges. There is a movement for the development of a +genuine Negro Republic in Africa, and for mass emigration. Also there is +a proposition, soon to be settled at an election, for the dividing of +the United States into three districts upon racial lines. First, there +are to be, in the Far South, three or four states which are inhabited +and governed solely by negroes, and to which white men may come only as +temporary visitors; a large group of states in the North which are white +states, and to which negroes may come only as visitors; and finally, a +middle group of states, in which both whites and black are allowed to +live, as at present, but with the proviso that no one may live there +who takes part in any form of racial strife or agitation. This program +gives to race-conscious negroes their own land, their own civilization, +their own chance of self-realization; it gives to race-conscious white +men the same opportunity; and it leaves to those who are not troubled by +the problem, a country where black and white may dwell in quiet good +fellowship. + +Finally, what has been the effect of our economic changes upon the +purely personal vices which gave us so much trouble and unhappiness in +the old days? What, for example, has been the effect upon vanity? You +should see our new crop of children in our high schools! There are no +longer any social classes among them; the rich ones do not arrive in +private automobiles, to make the poor ones envious, and they do not +isolate themselves in little snobbish cliques. They arrive in community +automobiles, and all wear uniforms--one of the simple devices by which +we repress the impulse of the young toward display of personal egotism. +They are all full of health and happy play, and their heads are busily +occupied with interesting ideas. Our girls are trained to thinking, +instead of to personal adornment; they are developing their minds, +instead of catching a rich husband by sexual charms. So we have been +able, in a single generation of training, to make a real and appreciable +difference in the amount of vanity and self-consciousness to be found +among our young people. + +And the same thing applies to a score of other undesirable qualities, +which, under the system of competitive commercialism, were +overstimulated in human beings. In those old days everyone was seeking +his own survival, and certain qualities which had survival value became +the principal characteristics of our race. Those qualities were greed +and persistence in acquisitiveness, cunning and subtlety, also bragging +and self-assertiveness. In that old world people destroyed their fellows +in order to make their own safety and power; they wasted goods in order +to be esteemed, to preserve what they called their "social position." +But now we have cut the roots of all these vile weeds. We have so +adjusted the business relationships of men that we do not have to have +hysterical religious revivals in order to keep the human factors alive +in their hearts. We have established it as a money fact, which everyone +quickly realizes, that it pays better to co-operate; there is more +profit and less bother in being of service to others. So we have +prepared a soil in which virtues grow instead of vices, and we find +that people become decent and kindly and helpful without exhortation, +and with no more moral effort than the average man can comfortably make. +Of course, we have still personal vices to combat, and new virtues to +discover and to propagate; but this has to do with the future, whereas +we are here confining ourselves to those things which have been +demonstrated in our new society. + + + + +INDEX + + +Abortion, 61 + +Abortions, 30 + +Advertising, 163 + +Agricultural co-operative, 206 + +Anarchism, 210 + +Anarchist, 89, 90 + +Anarchy, 172 + +Anglo-Saxon, 62, 111 + +"Appeal to Reason", 149 + +Aristocratic doctrine, 116 + +Armour, 128 + +Atherton, Gertrude, 87 + + +Babies, 63 + +Bachelorhood, 52 + +Bacon, Francis, 51 + +Banking system, 192 + +Bankruptcy, 162 + +Barbarism, 124 + +Barnum, P. T., 27 + +Berkman, Alexander, 173 + +Biology, 103 + +Birth control, 61, 76 + +Birth Control Review, 64 + +Blatchford, Robert, 55, 161 + +"Blind" love, 58 + +Bolsheviks, 172 + +Breach of promise suit, 91 + +Brothel, 66 + +Brothels, 31 + +Burbank, Luther, 99 + +Business man, 143 + + +Capital, 158 + +Capitalism, 136, 168 + +Capitalists, 142 + +Carnegie, 168 + +Catholic Church, 213, 216 + +Celibacy, 51, 52, 64 + +Chastity, 51 + +Chattel slavery, 186 + +Childbirths, 70 + +Children, 70, 72, 85, 208 + +Christianity, 115, 133 + +"Clarion", 31 + +Class struggle, 133, 177 + +Clay, Henry, 186 + +Coleridge, 85 + +"Collier's Weekly", 122, 163 + +Committee on Waste, 160 + +Commune, 129 + +Communism, 10, 170, 210 + +Compensation, 179 + +Competition, 108, 127 + +Competitive wage system, 148 + +"Complex", 49 + +Comstock, Anthony, 20 + +Confiscation, 179 + +Congress, 138 + +Contraception, 61 + +Co-operation, 109, 199, 200 + +Coquetry, 38 + +Corporation, 127 + +Courtship, 91 + +Credit, 152, 154, 192, 200 + +Credit-cards, 202 + +Crime, 164, 216 + +Culture, 62 + +Cutting, H. C., 200 + + +Dances, 15 + +Debs, Eugene V., 155 + +Degeneration, 121 + +"Demi-monde", 80 + +Democratic doctrine, 115 + +Dictatorship, 180, 183, 185 + +Dill, James B., 25 + +Disarmament, 157 + +Discouragement, 164 + +Disease, 217 + +Divorce, 32, 93, 97 + +Double standard, 5 + +"Douglas plan", 199 + +"Dumping", 152 + + +Economic evolution, 123 + +Economic man, 108 + +Emerson, 186 + +Emulation, 112 + +Engagements, 72 + +England, 120, 156, 175 + +Eugenics, 58 + +Evolution, 122 + +Exogamy, 105 + +Exploitation, 181 + +Exploiting, 148 + +Exports, 153 + + +Factory system, 129 + +Farming, 206 + +"Favorable balance", 151 + +Fear, 122, 164 + +Federal Reserve Act, 154 + +Feminist, 69 + +Feudal stage, 124 + +Fires, 163 + +Foreign trade, 151 + +"Free love", 44, 87 + +"Free lover", 92 + +France, 175 + +France, Anatole, 44 + +Freud, 104 + + +Gens, 9 + +Germany, 155, 156 + +Gillette, King C., 200 + +Goldman, Emma, 173 + +Gonorrhea, 30 + +Goode, Mary J., 41 + +Government, 166 + +"Graft", 127, 216 + +"Great Adventure", 188 + + +Hammurabi, 78 + +"Hamon case", 26 + +"Hard times", 144 + +Hardy, 13 + +Harris, Frank, 21 + +"High life", 23 + +Home, 42, 209 + +Honeymoon, 56 + +Hoover, Herbert, 160 + +House of Commons, 137 + +Huguenots, 134 + +Human nature, 99 + +Hunger, 122 + + +Ideals, 132 + +Imports, 153 + +Income tax, 143, 188 + +Industrial evolution, 126 + +Infant, 103 + +Infanticide, 61 + +Inflation, 196 + +Inheritance tax, 188 + +"Ingenues", 19 + +Instinct, 57 + +Insurance, 163 + +Intellectual production, 211 + +"Iron ring", 158 + +Island, 145 + +I. W. W., 169 + + +James, William, 16 + +Jealousy, 89 + +Jews, 127 + + +Kautsky, Karl, 210 + +"King Coal", 139 + +Kropotkin, 109, 129, 173 + + +Labor, 158 + +Labor checks, 202 + +Labor union, 199 + +Laissez faire, 110 + +Land tax, 190 + +Land titles, 179 + +Land values, 208 + +Late marriage, 67 + +Lecky, 6, 33 + +Leviticus, 78 + +Liberty motor, 164 + +London, Jack, 62 + +Los Angeles Times, 157 + +Love, 34, 47, 100, 112, 218 + +Lust, 48 + +Luther, Martin, 129 + +Luxury, 60 + + +Machinery, 149 + +"Magic gestures", 104 + +Magna Carta, 134 + +Malthusian law, 108 + +Markham, Edwin, 139 + +Marquesas Islands, 33 + +Marriage, 4 + +Marriage club, 71 + +Marriage market, 68 + +Marx, Karl, 132, 138, 176 + +Materialistic interpretation, 132 + +Material production 210 + +Maternity endowment 79 + +Meredith, George 43 + +"Merrie England" 161 + +Metchnikoff, Elie 33, 46 + +Mexico 121 + +Middle class 176, 186 + +Minor, Robert 173 + +Mistress 12 + +Money 37, 192, 202 + +Money Trust 194 + +Monogamy 5, 83, 90 + +Moors 134 + +Moralists 59 + +Morgan 128 + +Mother's pension 79 + +Moving pictures 17 + + +Negro 218 + +Negroes 116 + +Neuroses 105 + +Neurotics 103 + +North Dakota 194 + +North, Luke 188 + + +O'Brien, Frederick 10 + +Oedipus complex 104 + +"Open-shop" 177 + + +Panic 154 + +Parasitism 74 + +Passion 58 + +Permanence 87 + +Piracy 111 + +Pity 74 + +Plumb plan 198 + +Political evolution 123 + +Political revolution 125 + +Politics 213 + +Pornography 20 + +Postal savings bank 195 + +Poverty 40 + +Primitive man 9 + +Privilege 36 + +Professor Sumner 122 + +Profit system 148, 158 + +"Progressive polygamy" 90 + +Proletariat 142 + +Promiscuity 87 + +Property marriage 44 + +Prosperity 144 + +Prostitute 6 + +Prostitution 4, 31, 41, 217 + +Proudhon 179 + +Psycho-analysis 49, 103 + +Public bank 194 + +Publishing 212 + + +Quick, Herbert 165 + + +Race prejudice 62 + +Race problem 218 + +Racial immaturity 116 + +Raffeisen bank 200 + +Reeve, Sidney A. 160 + +Republic 125 + +Research 212 + +"Resurrection" 53 + +Revolt 134 + +Ricardo 108 + +Richardson, Dorothy 26 + +Ring 148 + +Robinson, Dr. William, J, 21, 30, 70, 77 + +Roman Catholic church 90 + +"Romance" 91 + +"Romantic" love 55 + +Roosevelt 61 + +Rulers 119 + +Russia 129, 185 + + +Sanger, Margaret 63 + +School of marriage 75 + +Selection 8 + +Sex 8 + +Sex education 72 + +Sex impulse 46 + +Sex problem 218 + +Sex urge 86 + +Sex war 81 + +Shelley 59, 89 + +"She-towns" 29 + +Shop management 168 + +Sienkiewicz 13 + +Sims, District Attorney 28 + +Single tax 188 + +Slavery 10, 126, 136 + +"Smart set" 24 + +Smith, Adam 108 + +Snobbery 61 + +Socialism, 166 + +Social revolution, 128, 147, 175 + +Soviets, 130, 171 + +"Speeding up", 138 + +Spencer, Herbert, 122 + +Spirituality, 64 + +Sport, 113 + +Standard wage, 203 + +Steel Trust, 137 + +Stopes, Dr. Marie C., 77 + +Strikes, 162 + +Syndicalism, 167 + +Syphilis, 30 + + +Tabu, 9 + +Tariff, 153 + +Taxes, 191 + +Tennyson, 38, 120 + +"The Brass Check", 31, 137 + +"The Conquest of Bread", 173 + +"The Cost of Competition", 160 + +"The Industrial Republic", 202 + +"The Jungle", 139 + +"The Lady", 12 + +"The Long Day", 26, 29 + +"The Nature of Man", 33 + +"The Profits of Religion", 137 + +"The Social Revolution", 210 + +"The Strangle Hold", 200 + +Thompson, A. M., 31 + +Tolstoi, 53 + +"Totem and Taboo", 104 + +"Triangle", 56 + + +Unconscious, 105 + +Unemployment, 147 + + +"Vamps", 19 + +Vanity, 219 + +Varietism, 85 + +Venereal disease, 30, 67, 83 + +Voltaire, 36 + +Voluntary Parenthood League, 64 + + +War, 162 + +Wars, 155 + +Waste, 165 + +Wells, H. G., 89 + +Wharton, Edith, 95 + +"Wild oats", 6 + +White man's burden, 117 + +White, William Allen, 17 + +Worker, 140 + +Workers, 176 + +Working class, 140 + +Woman, 12 + + +"Young love", 56, 73 + + * * * * * + + +BOOKS BY UPTON SINCLAIR + +Published by the Author, Pasadena, California + +Trade Distributors: The Paine Book Co., Chicago, [I]. + + +The Brass Check + +A Study of American Journalism + +Who owns the press and why? + +When you read your daily paper, are you reading facts or propaganda? And +whose propaganda? + +Who furnishes the raw material for your thoughts about life? Is it +honest material? + +No man can ask more important questions than these; and here for the +first time the questions are answered in a book. + +The first edition of this book, 23,000 copies, was sold out two weeks +after publication. Paper could not be obtained for printing, and a +carload of brown wrapping paper was used. The printings to date amount +to 144,000 copies. The book is being published in Great Britain and +colonies, and in translations in Germany, France, Holland, Norway, +Sweden, Denmark, Italy, Hungary and Japan. + + HERMANN BESSEMER, _in the "Neues Journal," Vienna_: + + "Upton Sinclair deals with names, only with names, with balances, + with figures, with documents, a truly stunning, gigantic + fact-material. His book is an armored military train which with + rushing pistons roars through the jungle of American monsterlies, + whistling, roaring, shooting, chopping off with Berserker rage the + obscene heads of these evils. A breath-taking, clutching, frightful + book is 'The Brass Check.'" + +(=Prices of all books, unless otherwise stated, cloth $1.20, 3 copies $3, +10 copies $9; paper 60c, 3 copies $1.50, 10 copies $4.50. All prices +postpaid.=) + + +THE BOOK OF LIFE + +A book of practical counsel. Volume One--Mind and Body. Discusses truth +and its standards, and the basis of health, both mental and physical. +Tells people how to live, in order to avoid waste and pain, and to find +happiness and achieve progress. + +Volume Two--Love and Society. Discusses health in sex; love and +marriage, chastity, monogamy, birth control, divorce. Explains modern +economic problems, Socialism, revolution, industrial democracy, and the +future society. Prices of volumes one and two bound in one, cloth $1.50, +paper $1.00. Either of the two volumes separately, cloth $1.20, paper +60c. + + +THE JUNGLE + +This novel, first published in 1906, caused an international sensation. +It was the best selling book in the United States for a year; also in +Great Britain and its colonies. It was translated into seventeen +languages, and caused an investigation by President Roosevelt, and +action by Congress. The book has been out of print for ten years, and is +now reprinted by the author at a lower price than when first published, +although the cost of manufacture has since more than doubled. + + "Not since Byron awoke one morning to find himself famous has there + been such an example of world-wide celebrity won in a day by a book + as has come to Upton Sinclair."--_New York Evening World._ + + "It is a book that does for modern industrial slavery what 'Uncle + Tom's Cabin' did for black slavery. But the work is done far better + and more accurately in 'The Jungle' than in 'Uncle Tom's + Cabin.'"--ARTHUR BRISBANE, _in the New York Evening Journal_. + + +KING COAL + +A novel of the Colorado coal country. + + "Clear, convincing, complete."--LINCOLN STEFFENS. + + "I wish that every word of it could be burned deep into the heart + of every American."--ADOLPH GERMER. + + DEBS AND THE POETS: Edited by Ruth Le Prade, with an introduction + by Upton Sinclair. A collection of poetry about Debs. + +SYLVIA: A novel of the South. + +SYLVIA'S MARRIAGE: A sequel. (Both in cloth only.) + + +100% A STORY OF A PATRIOT + +Would you like to go behind the scenes and see the "invisible +government" of your country saving you from the Bolsheviks and the Reds? +Would you like to meet the secret agents and provocateurs of "Big +Business," to know what they look like, how they talk and what they are +doing to make the world safe for democracy? Several of these gentlemen +have been haunting the home of Upton Sinclair during the past three +years and he has had the idea of turning the tables and investigating +the investigators. He has put one of them, Peter Gudge by name, into a +book, together with Peter's ladyloves, and his wife, and his boss, and a +whole group of his fellow-agents and their employers. + + _From_ LOUIS UNTERMEYER, _Author of "Challenge," etc._: + + "Upton Sinclair has done it again. He has loaded his Maxim (no + Silencer attached), taken careful aim, and--bang!--hit the bell + plump in the center. + + "First of all, '100%' is a story; a story full of suspense, drama, + 'heart interest,' plots, counterplots, high life, low life, humor, + hate and other passions--as thrilling as a W. S. Hart movie, as + interest-crammed as (and a darned sight more truthful than) your + daily newspaper." + + +THEY CALL ME CARPENTER: A TALE OF THE SECOND COMING + +Narrates how Jesus came to Los Angeles in the year 1921, and what +happened to Him. To be published in September, 1922. + + +THE CRY FOR JUSTICE + +An anthology of the literature of social protest, with an introduction +by Jack London, who calls it "this humanist Holy-book." Thirty-two +illustrations, 891 pages. Cloth, $1.50; paper, $1.00. + + "It should rank with the very noblest works of all time. You could + scarcely have improved on its contents--it is remarkable in variety + and scope. Buoyant, but never blatant, powerful and passionate, it + has the spirit of a challenge and a battle cry."--LOUIS UNTERMEYER. + + "You have marvelously covered the whole ground. The result is a + book that radicals of every shade have long been waiting for. You + have made one that every student of the world's thought--economic, + philosophic, artistic--has to have."--REGINALD WRIGHT KAUFFMAN. + + +THE PROFITS OF RELIGION + +A study of supernaturalism as a source of income and a shield to +privilege. The first investigation of this subject ever made in any +language. + + "You have put a lot of work into it and you have marshalled your + facts in, masterly fashion."--WILLIAM MARION REEDY. + + * * * * * + +The following typographical errors have been corrected by the text +transcriber: + +worshiping=>worshipping + +changes takes place=>changes take place + +is an impuse=>is an impulse + +center of continous=>center of continuous + +a starvling beggar at the gates=>a starving beggar at the gates + +of fool nations about sex=>of fool notions about sex + +any personal right in contravened=>any personal right is contravened + +industrial evoluton=>industrial evolution + +to the poeple=>to the people + +Social revoluton=>Social revolution + +her hands and and feet=>her hands and her feet + +Liebault=>Liebault + +Sienkewicz's "Whirlpools"=>Sienkiewicz's "Whirlpools" + +Magna Charta, 134=>Magna Carta, 134 + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and +Body; Vol. II Love and Society, by Upton Sinclair + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BOOK OF LIFE *** + +***** This file should be named 38117.txt or 38117.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/8/1/1/38117/ + +Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was +produced from images available at The Internet Archive) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/38117.zip b/38117.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2ef4bfd --- /dev/null +++ b/38117.zip diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9bc3fd --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #38117 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/38117) |
