diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-8.txt | 2569 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-8.zip | bin | 0 -> 50252 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 775477 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/37586-h.htm | 3241 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/coverf.jpg | bin | 0 -> 56704 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/coverr.jpg | bin | 0 -> 15167 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo01.jpg | bin | 0 -> 59339 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo14.jpg | bin | 0 -> 38760 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo18.png | bin | 0 -> 45651 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo19.png | bin | 0 -> 80001 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo22.png | bin | 0 -> 76832 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo30.jpg | bin | 0 -> 25684 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo33.jpg | bin | 0 -> 45204 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo37.jpg | bin | 0 -> 31002 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo40.jpg | bin | 0 -> 34263 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo42.png | bin | 0 -> 23505 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo43.png | bin | 0 -> 15404 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo44.png | bin | 0 -> 34000 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo49.jpg | bin | 0 -> 22113 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo53.jpg | bin | 0 -> 16598 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo57.jpg | bin | 0 -> 24045 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo59.jpg | bin | 0 -> 23374 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo62.jpg | bin | 0 -> 11699 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586-h/images/illo65.jpg | bin | 0 -> 39907 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586.txt | 2569 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37586.zip | bin | 0 -> 50230 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 |
29 files changed, 8395 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/37586-8.txt b/37586-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b9e85a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2569 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the +United States, by Claudia B. Kidwell + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the United States + +Author: Claudia B. Kidwell + +Release Date: October 1, 2011 [EBook #37586] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING *** + + + + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Harry Lamé and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + + + + + +------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | | + | TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES: | + | | + | The original language has been maintained, including inconsisten-| + | cies in spelling and hyphenation, except as mentioned below. | + | | + | Changes made to the original text: 'chemise type' changed to | + | 'chemise-type' as elsewhere; page 17: closing square bracket | + | deleted after 'what an array'; page 65: quote mark inserted | + | before footnote anchor [65]. | + | | + | Footnotes have been moved to directly underneath the paragraph | + | or section they refer to. | + | | + | Texts printed in italics in the original publication have been | + | transcribed between underscores, as in _text_; bold-face text is | + | represented here between equal signs, as in =text=. Small | + | capitals in the original are transcribed as ALL CAPITALS. | + | | + +------------------------------------------------------------------+ + + + + +UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 250 + +CONTRIBUTIONS FROM + +THE MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGY + +PAPER 64 + + +WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING COSTUME +IN THE UNITED STATES + + +_Claudia B. Kidwell_ + + + + + INTRODUCTION 3 + CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT 6 + BATHING COSTUME 14 + SWIMMING COSTUME 24 + CONCLUSIONS 32 + + +SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS + +CITY OF WASHINGTON + +1968 + + +For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing +Office Washington, D.C. 20402--Price 50 cents (paper cover) + +[Illustration: Figure 1.--BATHING COSTUME, from _The Delineator_, July +1884. (Smithsonian photo 58466.)] + + + + +_Claudia B. Kidwell_ + + +_Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the United States_ + + + _The evolution of the modern swim suit from an unflattering, + restrictive bathing dress into an attractive, functional costume + is traced from colonial times to the present. This evolution in + style reflects not only the increasing involvement of women in + aquatic activities but also the changing motivations for + feminine participation. The nature of the style changes in + aquatic dress were influenced by the fashions of the period, + while functional improvements were limited by prevailing + standards of modesty. This mutation of the bathing dress to the + swim suit demonstrates the changing attitudes and status of + women in the United States, from the traditional image of the + subordinate "weaker sex" to an equal and active member of the + society._ + + THE AUTHOR: _Claudia B. Kidwell is assistant curator of American + costume, department of civil history, in the Smithsonian + Institution's Museum of History and Technology._ + + + + +Introduction + + +Women's bathing dress holds a unique place in the history of American +costume. This specialized garb predates the age of sports costume which +arrived during the last half of the 19th century. Although bathing dress +shares this distinction with riding costume, the aquatic garb was merely +utilitarian in the late 18th century while riding costume had a +fashionable role. From its modest status, bathing gowns and later +bathing dresses became more important until their successor, the +swimming suit, achieved a permanent place among the outfits worn by 20th +century women. The social significance of this accomplishment was best +expressed by Foster Rhea Dulles, author of _America Learns to Play_, in +1940, when he wrote: + + The modern bathing-suit ... symbolized the new status of women + even more than the short skirts and bobbed hair of the jazz age + or the athleticism of the devotees of tennis and golf. It was + the final proof of their successful assertion of the right to + enjoy whatever recreation they chose, costumed according to the + demands of the sport rather than the tabus of an outworn + prudery, and to enjoy it in free and natural association with + men.[1] + + [1] FOSTER RHEA DULLES, _America Learns to Play, 1607-1940_ (New York: + D. Appleton-Century Company, 1940), p. 363. + +Since the prescribed limitations of women's role in any given period are +determined and affected by many social factors, the evolution of the +bathing gown to the swimming suit may not only be dependent upon the +changes in the American woman's way of life, but also may reflect +certain technological and sociological factors that are not readily +identifiable. The purpose of this paper is to describe the changes in +women's bathing dress and wherever pertinent to present the factors +affecting these styles.[2] + + [2] The author is indebted to Mrs. Anne W. Murray, formerly Curator + in Charge of American Costume, Smithsonian Institution, for the + interest she has shown throughout the research and writing of + this paper. The difficulties of this work would have been + greatly compounded without the benefit of her experience and + encouragement. + +Anyone who attempts to research the topic of swimming and related +subjects will be confronted with a history of varying reactions. Ralph +Thomas, in 1904, described his experiences through the years that he +spent compiling a book on swimming: + + When asked what I was doing, I have felt the greatest reluctance + to say a work on the literature of swimming. People who were + writing novels or some other thing of little practical utility + always looked at me with a smile of pity on my mentioning + swimming. Though I am bound to say that, when I gave them some + idea of the work, the pity changed somewhat but then they would + say "Why don't you give us a new edition of your Handbook of + Fictitious Names?" As if the knowledge of the real name of an + author was of any importance in comparison with the discussion + of a subject that more or less concerns every human being.[3] + + [3] RALPH THOMAS, _Swimming_ (London: Sampson Low, Marsten & Company + Limited, 1904), p. 15. + +Such reactions toward research about swimming probably discouraged many +serious efforts of writing about the subject. Its scant coverage and +even omission in histories of recreation or sports may be explained by +the fact that swimming cannot be categorized as simply physical +exercise, skill, recreation, or competitive sport. In trying to +determine the extent to which women swam in times past it is frustrating +to observe the historians' masculine bias in researching and reporting +social history. + +A study of women's bathing dress meets with similar problems, and while +a discussion of bathing dress can evoke considerable interest, its +nature is usually considered more superficial than serious. Descriptions +of, and even brief references to, bathing apparel for women are very +scarce before the third quarter of the 19th century. Before this time +only decorative costume items were considered worthy of description and +bathing costume was not in this category. It is only within +comparatively recent times that costume historians have conceded +sufficient importance to bathing dress to include meaningful +descriptions in their research. + +Participation in water activities was widespread in the ancient world +although the earliest origins of this activity are unknown. For example, +in Greece and, later, in Rome, swimming was valued as a pleasurable +exercise and superb physical training for warriors. The more sedentary +citizens turned to the baths which became the gathering point for +professional men, philosophers, and students. Thus bathing and swimming, +combined originally to fulfill the functions of cleansing and exercise +purely for physical well being, developed the secondary functions of +recreation and social intercourse. + +With the rise of the Christian church and its spreading anti-pagan +attitudes, many of the sumptuous baths were destroyed. Christian +asceticism also may have contributed to the decline of bathing for +cleansing. In addition there was a secular belief that outdoor bathing +helped to spread the fearful epidemics that periodically swept the +continent. Although there is isolated evidence that swimming was valued +as a physical skill,[4] swimming and bathing all but disappeared during +the Middle Ages. + + [4] JOSEPH STRUTT, _The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England_ + (London: Chatto and Windus, 1876), pp. 151-152. + +In 1531, long after the Middle Ages, Sir Thomas Elyot wrote of swimming +that + + There is an exercise, whyche is right profitable in extreme + danger of warres, but ... it hathe not ben of longe tyme muche + used, specially amoge noble men, perchaunce some reders whl + lyttell esteeme it.[5] + + [5] SIR THOMAS ELYOT, _The Boke Named the Governour_ (London, 1557), + vol. 1, pp. 54-55. + +This early English writer gave no instructions, but expounded on the +value of swimming as a skill that could be useful in time of war. + +It herewith becomes necessary to differentiate between bathing and +swimming with their attendant goals, for it was the goals of each +activity which influenced the associated customs and costume designs. +For this discussion we shall define bathing as the act of immersing all +or part of the body in water for cleansing, therapeutic, recreational, +or religious purposes, and swimming as the self-propulsion of the body +through water. When we refer to swimming it is necessary to distinguish +whether it was considered a useful skill, a therapeutic exercise, a +recreation, or a competitive sport. Thus it is important to note that +while bathing for all purposes and swimming as a physical exercise, +recreation, and sport died out during the Middle Ages, the latter +continued to be valued as a skill, particularly for warriors. This +function of swimming survived to form the link between the ancients and +the 17th century. + +According to Ralph Thomas, the first book on swimming was written by +Nicolas Winmann, a professor of languages at Ingolstadt in Bavaria, and +printed in 1528. The first book published in England on swimming was +written in Latin by Everard Digby and printed in 1587. As Thomas has +stated, Digby's book + + ... is entitled to a far more important place than the first of + the world, because, whereas Winmann had never (up to 1866) been + translated or copied or even quoted by any one, Digby has been + three times translated; twice into English and once into French + and through this latter became and probably still is the best + known treatise on the subject.[6] + + [6] THOMAS, op. cit. (footnote 3), p. 172. + +This French version was first published in 1696 with its purported +author being Monsieur Melchisédesh Thévenot. In his introduction +Thévenot indicates that he has made use of Digby's book in his own +treatise and that he knows of Winmann's publication. The English +translation of Thévenot's version became the standard instruction book +for English-speaking peoples. Typically, his reasons in favor of men +swimming were based on its being a useful skill (i.e., to keep from +being drowned in a shipwreck, to escape capture when being pursued by +enemies, and to attack an enemy posted on the opposite side of a +river).[7] + + [7] MELCHISÉDESH THÉVENOT, _The Art of Swimming_ (London: John Lever, + 1789), pp. 4-5. + +In the 18th and 19th centuries numerous other publications on swimming +appeared--too numerous to deal with in this paper. Nevertheless, the +refinement of the art of swimming was not related to the number of +instruction books. Few of these books actually offered new insights in +comparison with those that were outright plagiarisms or filled with +misinformation. In the meantime, bathing was reintroduced and as this +activity became more widespread swimming was regarded as more than a +useful skill, but only for men. + +There is little evidence of women bathing or swimming prior to the 17th +century; these activities seem to have been exclusively for men. +Nevertheless, Thomas refers to Winmann as writing, in 1538, that + + at Zurich in his day (thus implying that he was an elderly man + and that the custom had ceased) the young men and maidens bathed + together around the statue of "Saint Nicolai." Even in those + days his pupil asks "were not the girls ashamed of being naked?" + "No, as they wore bathing drawers--sometimes a marriage was + brought about." If any young man failed to bring up stones from + the bottom, when he dived, he had to suffer the penalty of + wearing drawers like the girls.[8] + + [8] THOMAS, op. cit. (footnote 3), p. 161. + +Thomas goes on to say that the only evidence he had found of women +swimming in England in early days was in a ballad entitled "The Swimming +Lady" and dating from about 1670. Despite these isolated references it +was not until the 19th century that women were encouraged to swim. + +After its decline in the Middle Ages, bathing achieved new popularity as +a medicinal treatment for both men and women. In England this revival +occurred in the 17th century when certain medical men held that bathing +in fresh water had healing properties. The resultant spas, which were +developed at freshwater springs to effect such "cures," expanded rapidly +as the number of their devotees increased. By the mid-18th century, +rival practitioners claimed even greater health-giving properties for +sea water both as a drink and for bathing. An economic benefit resulted +when, tiny, poverty-stricken fishing hamlets became famous through the +patronage of the wealthy in search of health as well as pleasure. + +When the early colonists left England in the first half of the 17th +century, the beliefs and practices they had acquired in their original +homes were brought to the new world. Thus, it is important to note that +during this period in Europe, swimming was a skill practiced by few, +primarily soldiers and sailors. It was not until the second half of the +century that bathing for therapeutic purposes was becoming popular in +the old world. + +The earliest reference to women's bathing costume has been quoted +previously in Winmann's amazing description of mixed bathing at Zurich. +He referred to women, wearing only drawers, bathing with men as a custom +no longer practiced when he wrote his book in 1538. + +One of the earliest illustrations of bathing costume I have located is +part of a painted fan leaf, about 1675, that was reproduced in volume 9 +of Maurice Leloir's _Histoire du Costume de l'Antiquité_ in 1914. In one +corner of this painting, which depicts a variety of activities going on +in the Seine and on the river banks at Paris, women are shown immersing +themselves in water within a covered wooden frame. They are wearing +loose, light-colored gowns and long headdresses. An English source of +the late 17th century described a very similar costume. + + The ladye goes into the bath with garments made of yellow + canvas, which is stiff and made large with great sleeves like a + parson's gown. The water fills it up so that it's borne off that + your shape is not seen, it does not cling close as other + lining.[9] + + [9] CELIA FIENNES, _Through England on Horseback_, as quoted in IRIS + BROOKE and JAMES LAVER, _English Costume from the Fourteenth + through the Nineteenth Century_ (New York: The Macmillan Company, + 1937), p. 252. + +In the course of my contacts with other costume historians I have +encountered the belief that women did not wear any bathing costume +before the mid-19th century. Supporting this theory I have seen a +reproduction of a print, about 1812, showing women bathing nude in the +ocean at Margate, England, but the evidence already presented indicates +clearly that costume was worn earlier. Also certain English secondary +sources refer to a nondescript chemise-type of bathing dress that was +worn during the first quarter of the 19th century. Because little study +has been given European bathing costume, it is not possible to +conjecture under what circumstances costume was or was not used. We do +know, however, that when bathing became popular in the new world bathing +gowns were worn by some women in the old. + + + + +Cultural Environment + + +As many European cultural traits were transmitted to the new world via +England, so was the introduction of water activities. Nevertheless it +required a number of years for such cultural refinements as bathing to +take root in the new environment. The early colonists brought with them +a limited knowledge of swimming, but they did not have the leisure to +cultivate this skill. In New England the Puritan religious and social +beliefs were as restrictive as the lack of leisure time. In this harsh +climate, self-indulgence in swimming and bathing did not fulfill the +requirements of being righteous and useful. Thus the growing popularity +of bathing among the wealthy in Europe during the 17th and early 18th +centuries had little initial impact in the new world. + +Although swimming as a skill predated the introduction of bathing to the +new world, I will first discuss bathing since the customs and facilities +established for it reveal the development of swimming in America, first +for men and then for women. + + +BATHING + +One of the earliest sources showing an appreciation of mineral waters +for bathing in the new world is a 1748 reference in George Washington's +diary to the "fam'd Warm Springs."[10] At that time only open ground +surrounded the springs which were located within a dense forest. + + [10] GEORGE WASHINGTON, _The Writings of George Washington_, John C. + Fitzpatrick, ed. (Washington: United States Congress, 1931), vol. + 1, p. 8. + +Another entry for July 31, 1769, records his departure with Mrs. +Washington for these springs (now known as Berkeley Springs, West +Virginia) where they stayed more than a month. They were accompanied by +her daughter, Patsy Custis, who was probably taken in hope of curing a +form of epilepsy with which she was afflicted. In the latter part of the +18th century hundreds of visitors annually flocked to these springs. +Although the accommodations were primitive, we early note that the +avowed therapeutic aims for visiting these waters were very quickly +combined with a growing social life on dry land. + + Rude log huts, board and canvas tents, and even covered wagons, + served as lodging rooms, while every party brought its own + substantial provisions of flour, meat and bacon, depending for + lighter articles of diet on the "Hill folk," or the success of + their own foragers. A large hollow scooped in the sand, + surrounded by a screen of pine brush, was the only + bathing-house; and this was used alternately by ladies and + gentlemen. The time set apart for the ladies was announced by a + blast on a long tin horn, at which signal all of the opposite + sex retired to a prescribed distance, ... Here day and night + passed in a round of eating and drinking, bathing, fiddling, + dancing, and reveling. Gaming was carried to a great excess and + horse-racing was a daily amusement.[11] + + [11] JOHN J. MOORMAN, _The Virginia Springs_ (Richmond: J. W. + Randolph, 1854), pp. 259-260. + +The more permanent bath houses found at the increasing number of springs +in the early 19th century were really only shanties built where the +water bubbled up. Nevertheless, as civilization moved in upon these +resorts, the current taboos and mores were soon imposed. These gave rise +to customs, facilities, and inventions peculiar to the pastime. The more +permanent facilities carefully separated men from women. Frequently the +women's bath was located a considerable distance from the men's and +surrounded by a high fence. Female attendants were at hand to wait upon +the ladies, and private rooms were prepared for their use both before +and after bathing. + +In the early 19th century the fame of Berkeley Springs was eclipsed +temporarily by the growing popularity of other springs, such as Saratoga +in the north and White Sulphur Springs in the south. The newest +facilities, however, and the completion of the Baltimore and Ohio +Railroad, restored Berkeley to its former prosperity in the early 1850s. + +The bath houses at Berkeley Springs in the 1850s are an example of the +facilities that were considered convenient, extensive, and elegant +during this period. The gentlemen's bath house contained fourteen +dressing rooms and ten large bathing rooms. In addition to the plunge +baths, which were twelve feet long, five feet wide, and four and a half +feet deep, the men had a swimming bath that was sixty feet long, twenty +feet wide, and five feet deep. The ladies' and men's bath houses were +located on opposite sides of the grove. As if this were not reassuring +enough, we are told that the building for the weaker sex was surrounded +by several acres of trees. Thus protected, feminine bathers could choose +either one of the nine private baths or the plunge bath, which was +thirty feet long by sixteen feet wide and four and a half feet deep, as +well as use a shower or artificial warm baths.[12] + + [12] Ibid., p. 264. + +The differences between the two bath houses show that women were not as +active in the water as the men. Judging from the kind of facilities that +were provided at Berkeley Springs, the ladies did less "plunging" than +the men and no swimming. + +Although accepted in England, bathing in =salt= water did not become +popular in the new world until some time after bathing at springs was +established. + +In 1794 a Mr. Bailey announced that he planned to institute "bathing +machines and several species of entertainment" at his resort on Long +Island.[13] "A machine of peculiar construction for bathing in the open +sea" was advertised a few years later by a hotel proprietor at Nahant, +Massachusetts.[14] There is some question as to what the term "bathing +machine" describes. Existing records show that W. Merritt of New York +City received a patent dated February 1, 1814, for a "bathing machine." +Unfortunately neither a description nor a drawing can be found today. +European patents from the first half of the 19th century reveal that a +bathing machine could be a contraption in which an individual bathed in +privacy. This is what the above quotations seem to be describing. In +general usage, however, "bathing machine" could also have been a device +in which an individual removed his clothing to prepare for bathing; this +type will be described later. + + [13] HENRY WANSAY, _An Excursion to the United States_ (Salisbury: J. + Easton, 1798), p. 211, as quoted in DULLES, _America Learns to + Play_, p. 152. + + [14] FRED ALLAN WILSON, _Some Annals of Nahant_ (Boston: Old Corner + Book Store, 1928), p. 77, as quoted in DULLES, _America Learns to + Play_, p. 152. + +By the early 19th century floating baths were established in every city +of any importance including Boston, Salem, Hartford, New York, +Philadelphia, Washington, Richmond, Charleston, and Savannah. One bath +located at the foot of Jay Street in New York City was described as +follows: + + The building is an octagon of seventy feet in diameter, with a + plank floor supported by logs so as to sink the center bath four + feet below the surface of the water, but in the private baths + the water may be reduced to three or even two feet so as to be + perfectly safe for children. It is placed in the current so + always to be supplied with ocean and pure water and rises and + falls with the tide.[15] + + [15] _New York Evening Post_ (June 4, 1813). + +As was true at the springs, men and women were segregated; but in the +floating baths they were only separated by being in different +compartments rather than in different bath houses. + +Although there were a number of these baths there were not enough to +cover all of the inviting river banks and sea shores. There are many +instances of men enjoying the water of undeveloped shores and there is +some evidence of women venturing into the bays and rivers (fig. 2). + +[Illustration: Figure 2.--"BATHING PARTY, 1810," painting by William P. +Chappel. + +(_Courtesy of Museum of the City of New York._)] + +Nevertheless, few women ventured into the open ocean during the early +19th century. They were generally afraid to brave the force of the ocean +waves with only a female companion, since prevailing attitudes regarding +the proper behavior of a lady prevented them from being accompanied by a +man. When a few ignored this dictate, their bold actions gave rise to +"ill-founded stories of want of delicacy on the part of the +females."[16] An unbiased traveler, who gave an account of this mixed +bathing in 1833, stated that parties always went into the water +completely dressed and for that reason he could see no great violation +of modesty. Mixed bathing at the seashore (fig. 3) was gaining +acceptance, however, when it was reported only thirteen years later that +"... ladies and gentlemen bathe in company, as is the fashion all along +the Atlantic Coast...."[17] + + [16] JAMES STUART, _Three Years in North America_ (Edinburgh: Robert + Cadwell, 1833), vol. 1, p. 441. + + [17] J. W. and N. ORR, _Orr's Book of Swimming_ (New York: Burns and + Baner, 1846) as quoted in THOMAS, op. cit. (footnote 3), p. 270. + +In place of the dressing rooms available in the floating baths, special +facilities were frequently provided. The bathing machine--in this case a +device in which one changed clothes--was used where there was a gentle +slope down to the water. This species of bathing machine was a small +wooden cabin set on very high wheels with steps leading down from a door +in the front. The bather entered and, while he was changing, the machine +was pulled into the sea by a horse. When water was well above the axles +the horse was uncoupled and taken ashore. The bather was then free to +enter the sea by descending the steps pointed away from the shore (fig. +4). Machines of the 18th and early 19th century were frequently equipped +with an awning which shielded the bather from public view as she or he +descended the steps to enter the water. These awnings were left off the +bathing machines during the last half of the 19th century. Such machines +were used to a great extent in Europe during the 18th and 19th +centuries. In the United States, however, they were used only to a +limited extent during the first half of the 19th century. By 1870 they +had practically disappeared--being replaced by the stationary, +sentry-box type of individual structure and the large communal bath +house. + +"Sentry-boxes" were used before the 1870s at beaches where the terrain +did not encourage the use of the bathing machines. At Long Branch, New +Jersey, and at one of the beaches at Newport, Rhode Island, lines of +these stationary structures were available to the bather for changing, +one half designated for women and the other half for men. Hours varied +but it was the practice to run up colored flags to signal bathing times +for the ladies and then the gentlemen. A male correspondent wrote from +Newport in 1857: + + If you are social and wish to bathe promiscuously, you put on a + dress and go in with the ladies, if you want to cultivate the + "fine and froggy art of swimming," unencumbered by attire, you + wait until the twelve o'clock red-flag is run up--when the + ladies retire.[18] + + [18] "Life at Watering-Places--Our Newport Correspondent," _Frank + Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (August 29, 1857), vol. 4, no. + 91, p. 197. + +From its early beginnings, in the late 18th and early 19th century, the +summer excursion to the resorts and spas grew in popularity. In 1848, a +writer of a Philadelphia fashion report explained that + + Very few ladies of fashion are now in town, most of them being + birds of passage during the last of July and all of August. Most + Americans seem to have adopted the fashion of visiting + watering-places through the summer.[19] + + [19] "Chit-Chat upon Philadelphia Fashions for August," _Godey's + Lady's Book_ (August 1848), vol. 37, p. 119. + +As the summer excursion became a social event, the recreational +possibilities of bathing overshadowed its earlier therapeutic function. +Bathing became part of an increasingly elaborate schedule of activities +where each event--bathing, dining, concerts, balls, promenades, carriage +rides--had its appointed time, place, and proper costume. + +[Illustration: Figure 3.--"SCENE AT CAPE MAY," _Godey's Lady's Book_, +August 1849. (_Courtesy of The New York Public Library._)] + +In addition to stiff ocean breezes, seaside resorts had an extra appeal +that beguiled visitors away from the spas--namely mixed bathing. For +during the bathing hour at the seashore all the stiffness and etiquette +of select society was abandoned to pleasure. + + Again and again I try it. Deliriusm! I forget even Miss ----, + and dive headforemost into the billows. I rush to meet them. I + jump on their backs. I ride on their combs, or I let them roll + over me.... I am in the thickest of the bathers, and amid the + roar of waves, am driven wild with excitement by the shouts of + laughter; burst of noisy merriment, and little jolly female + shrieks of fun. All are wild with excitement, ducking, diving, + splashing, floating, rollicking.[20] + + [20] "My First Day at Cape May," _Peterson's Magazine_ (August 1856), + vol. 30, no. 2, p. 91. + +Thus bathing was transformed from a medicinal treatment to a pleasurable +pursuit. + +Excursionists had to be hardy individuals, firm in their resolve to +complete their trip. Although many railroad lines had been completed +by the 1850s, transportation problems were by no means solved. For +example, a New York tourist who planned to enjoy a summer at Lake George +had to travel by boat from New York City to Albany and Troy, then by +railroad to Morean Corner, and, finally, by stage to the lake. After +listing the difficulties endured by excursionists, a particularly +embittered correspondent commented in 1856, "... we envy these happy +people in nothing but the power to be idle."[21] + + [21] _Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (July 26, 1856), vol. 2, + no. 33, p. 102. + +[Illustration: Figure 4.--"THE BATHE AT NEWPORT," by Winslow Homer, +_Harper's Weekly Newspaper_, September 1858. (Smithsonian photo 59665.)] + +By the 1870s, travel facilities were rapidly being improved and many new +summer resorts were established which appealed to a larger segment of +the population. + + Comparatively few can stay long at one time at the springs or + seaside resorts, and hence the peculiar value of arrangements + like those for enabling multitudes to take frequent short + pleasant excursions down the New York Bay and along the Atlantic + coast, as well as up the Hudson, and through Long Island + Sound.[22] + + [22] "Summer Recreation," _Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (June + 18, 1870), vol. 30, no. 768, p. 210. + +Beaches that catered to a large cross-section of the population provided +a wide variety of informal activities that replaced the established +functions found at the more select bathing resorts. For example, the +illustration of Coney Island in 1878 (fig. 5) shows a puppet show; pony +rides for children; a hurdy gurdy; vendors of walking sticks, +sunglasses, and food; and guide ropes in the water for timid bathers. + +[Illustration: Figure 5.--"SCENES AND INCIDENTS ON CONEY ISLAND," +_Harper's Weekly Newspaper_, August 1878. + +(Smithsonian photo 59666.)] + +In the 1890s foreign visitors were impressed by American concern with +finding opportunities to play; early in the century they had remarked on +the apparent lack of interest in amusements. The term, "summer resorts," +no longer referred to a relatively small number of fashionable watering +places. The _New York Tribune_ was running eight columns of summer hotel +advertisements aimed directly at the middle class. The popular _Summer +Tourist and Excursion Guide_ listed moderate-priced hotels and railroad +excursions; it was a far departure from the fashionable tour of the +1840s. + +Thus, as economic and technological factors changed, bathing was +transformed from a medicinal treatment for the leisure class to a +recreation enjoyed by a large portion of the population. + + +SWIMMING + +As has been stated earlier, swimming was being practiced by men in +Europe when the early colonists were leaving their old homes. +Nevertheless, the task of establishing new homes left them little time +to practice the "art of swimming" or to teach it to fellow colonists. + +Benjamin Franklin is no doubt the most famous early proponent of +swimming in the colonies. In his autobiography written in the form of a +letter to his son in 1771, Franklin revealed his early interest in +swimming. + + I had from a child been delighted with this exercise, had + studied and practiced Thévenot's motions and position, and added + some of my own, aiming at the graceful and easy, as well as the + useful.[23] + + [23] JARED SPARKS, _The Works of Benjamin Franklin_ (Boston: Tappan + and Whittemore, 1844), vol. I, pp. 63-64. + +Benjamin Franklin used every opportunity to encourage his friends to +learn to swim, + + as I wish all men were taught to do in their youth; they would, + on many occurrences, be the safer for having that skill, and on + many more the happier, as freer from painful apprehensions of + danger, to say nothing of the enjoyment in so delightful and + wholesome an exercise.[24] + + [24] J. FROST, _The Art of Swimming_ (New York: P. W. Gallaudet, + 1818), p. 57. + +Not only was Franklin in favor of being able to swim but when requested +he advised friends on methods for how to teach oneself. His +instructions, in his letter of September 28, 1776 to Mr. Oliver Neale, +were published a number of times even as late as the 1830s. + +America's first swimming school was established at Boston in 1827 by +Francis Liefer. Two expert swimmers, John Quincy Adams and John James +Audubon, the ornithologist, visited the school and each expressed +delight at having found such an establishment. + +Numerous books instructing men how to swim were brought into the United +States in the early 19th century and some were republished here, but the +first original work (i.e., not a plagiarism) by an American was not +published until 1846. In this book the author, James Arlington Bennet, +M.D., LL.D., based his instructions upon his own personal observations +as an experienced swimmer. Dr. Bennet's publication requires special +note not only due to the basic value of the information but because of +the extraordinary title (i.e., _The Art of Swimming Exemplified by +Diagrams from Which Both Sexes May Learn to Swim and Float on the Water; +and Rules for All Kinds of Bathing in the Preservation of Health and +Cure of Disease, with the Management of Diet from Infancy to Old Age, +and a Valuable Remedy Against Sea-sickness_). Thanks to this explicit +title we learn that Dr. Bennet was in favor of women learning to swim. +This energetic aquatic activity had long been considered a masculine +skill and, despite such a significant publication, this attitude +continued until much later in the century. + +We have already noted in a previous discussion that the Berkeley Springs +bath houses of the 1850s provided a swimming bath for men but no similar +facilities for women. Also at certain seaside resorts of the same +period, a special time was set for men to practice the art of swimming +without clothing, but women had no similar opportunity. When the ladies +entered the water they were clothed from head to toe because men were +also present. The description of women's bathing costume, which will +appear in a later section, clearly shows that women could do little more +than try to maintain their footing. Undoubtedly some "brazen" women did +find the opportunity to swim, but the general attitude was that women +should only immerse themselves in water. + +By the 1860s there was a widespread health movement which gave +additional momentum to the belief that physical exercise was good for +one's well-being. As a result, women were being encouraged to emerge +from their state of physical inactivity imposed by social custom. +Swimming had already gained recognition as a healthful exercise for men, +but with this fresh approach it was even being suggested that women +should swim. A column that appeared in 1866, entitled "Physical Exercise +for Females," asserted that + + Bathing, as it is practiced at our coast resorts, is, no doubt, + a delightful recreation; but if to it swimming could be added, + the delight would be increased, and the possible use and + advantage much extended.[25] + + [25] _Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (August 25, 1866), vol. + 22, no. 569, p. 355. + +In answer to the possible objection that the facilities for teaching +were not always available, the writer maintained that in addition to the +seashore there were rivers, lakes, and ponds as well as the swimming +baths found in most large cities. He further asserted that if the demand +were great enough, certain days could be appropriated exclusively to +women as was done in some of the London baths. + +The type of baths referred to in this case were not built simply to +supply a health-giving treatment or for recreation as described earlier. +As part of the health movement mentioned above, there was a growing +concern in regards to personal cleansing; it was realized that merely +splashing water on the face in the morning was not sufficient for good +personal hygiene. While facilities for washing the whole body were being +installed in wealthy homes, there was also a growing concern for the +masses of people who could not afford such extravagance. Thus +philanthropic individuals encouraged the building of public swimming +baths in densely populated, low income areas. It was hoped that, +although the patrons would be covered by bathing costume and would be +seeking refreshment and recreation, this unaccustomed contact with water +would improve their personal hygiene. + +In 1870 a reporter for _Leslie's_, who was describing two elegant large +bathhouses (the type described above) in New York City, stated that +Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays were set apart for ladies and Tuesdays, +Thursdays, and Saturdays for gentlemen. These baths became quite popular +in the large cities, particularly among people who could not afford the +time or money to make trips even to the near seaside resorts. By the +1880s they were so popular that bathing time was scheduled to allow many +sets of bathers to enjoy the water. Thus a number of women who had +probably never been completely covered with water before had the +opportunity to learn to swim. + +While women were being encouraged to practice swimming as a healthful +exercise, this activity was being recognized as a recreation and sport +for men. The increasing affluence during the last three decades of the +19th century, which made possible the widespread popularity of summer +excursions, encouraged swimming as an individual pastime as well as a +growing spectator sport. This was true not only for swimming but for +nearly every sport we enjoy today. In 1871 a reporter wrote: + + It is not underrating the interest attached to yachting or + rowing matches, to say that swimming clubs and swimming matches + can be made to create wider and more useful emulation among "the + Million" who can never participate in or benefit by those + notable trials of skill and muscle.[26] + + [26] Ibid. (July 29, 1871), vol. 32, no. 826, p. 322. + +By the 1890s this growing interest in spectator and individual sports +evidenced several interesting results. Separate sporting pages were +established in the formats of many newspapers. In addition to being a +summer pastime, "the art of swimming" became an intercollegiate and +Olympic sport, and was included on the roster of events for the 1896 +revival of the Olympic Games held in Athens. Innovations in facilities +and techniques helped to alter the character of swimming. The most +notable of these were the development of the indoor pool and the +introductions of the crawl stroke into the United States. + +It was in this time period that swimming for women was becoming socially +acceptable. In 1888, Goucher College, a prominent girls' school, built +its own indoor pool and the following year swimming was listed in its +catalog for the first time. Writers, in turn, no longer felt it +necessary to convince readers that women should be more active in the +water, but concentrated instead on what a woman should know when she +swims. This changing attitude gained world-wide recognition in 1912 at +Stockholm when the 100-meter swimming event for women was included in +the schedule. + +The period of prosperity following World War I brought a marked increase +in the appreciation of recreation, resulting in an increase of swimming +pools and available beaches. Indoor pools, which made swimming a +year-round activity, were becoming even more numerous than beaches. +Swimming was now established as a sport and a recreation for both men +and women. According to a 1924 magazine article in the _Delineator_, +seldom was a swimming meet held anywhere in the country without events +for women. At Palm Beach, however, one of the few remaining citadels of +"high society," an axiom of fashion dictated that a lady or gentleman +not go into the water before 11:45 in the morning; should one do so, one +ran the risk of being taken for a maid or valet. The masses, however, +swam for pleasure without regard to the inhibitions of high fashion. + +This period was also marked by the advent of swimming personalities of +both sexes. Johnny Weissmuller became a popular hero for his +accomplishments in competitive swimming from 1921 to 1929. Even before +the war Annette Kellerman, star of vaudeville and movies, had become +famous for her fancy diving as well as her celebrated figure, which she +daringly exhibited in a form-fitting, one-piece suit. In addition to +writing an autobiography, she authored articles and a swimming +instruction book for women. As an example of what exercise, including +swimming, could do for women, Annette Kellerman also lent her name to a +course of physical culture for less "well-developed" ladies. Another +product of this new age of recreation was Gertrude Ederle, who learned +to swim at the Woman's Swimming Association of New York. She rose to +sudden fame in 1926 as the first woman to swim the English Channel. + +As previously stated, swimming was practiced through the Middle Ages as +a useful skill for men. Gradually this activity became regarded as also +a healthful exercise and then as a recreation. Finally by the late 19th +century swimming also had achieved the status of a competitive +sport--but for men only. It was not until the 1920s that social +attitudes permitted women the same full use of the water as men. + +The restrictive attitudes defining women's proper behavior in the water +prior to the 1920s were one element of the mores defining women's +participation in society. Thus as more liberal attitudes gained +acceptance and modified the original concept of the "weaker sex," women +gradually achieved social acceptance of their full participation in +aquatic activities. + + + + +Bathing Costume + + +Bathing became popular as a medicinal treatment for both men and women +of the new world in the last half of the 18th century. It was the only +aquatic activity, however, that was considered proper for women until +over a hundred years later. + +Like so many other customs, changes in bathing costume styles were +initially introduced by way of England. They were adapted or rejected +according to the special conditions of this continent. To give a clearer +picture of the costume worn in the colonies and in the United States, +descriptions of the English dress will be included where pertinent. I +have not, however, found any evidence showing that bathing nude was a +practice for women in this country. + + +THE EARLY BATHING GOWN + +It is disappointing but not surprising to discover the lack of +descriptions pertaining to early bathing costume. This simple gown was +utilitarian, not decorative. Thus it deserved little attention in the +eyes of the contemporary bather. + +No doubt it is due to the importance of the original owner that the +following example has survived. In the collection of family memorabilia +at Mount Vernon, there is a chemise-type bathing gown that is said to +have been worn by Martha Washington (fig. 6). According to a note +attached to the gown signed by Eliza Parke Custis, and addressed to +"Rosebud," a pet name for her daughter, Martha Washington probably wore +this bathing gown at Berkeley Springs as she accompanied her daughter, +Patsy, in her bath. + +This blue and white checked linen gown has several construction details +similar to the chemise, a woman's undergarment, of the period. The +sleeves were gathered near the shoulder and were set in with a gusset at +the armpit. The skirt of the gown was made wider at the bottom by the +usual method of adding four long triangular pieces--one to each side of +both the front and back. The sleeves, however, are not as full as those +one would expect to find on a chemise of the period. Also a chemise +would probably have had a much wider neckline gathered by a draw-string +threaded through a band at the neck edge. Instead, this bathing gown has +a moderately low neckline made wider by a slit down the front which is +closed by two linen tapes sewn to either edge of the front. Although +less fabric was used for the bathing gown than was normally required to +make a chemise, it was probably not because of functional considerations +as one might like to think, but because of the scarcity of fabric. Close +examination reveals that the triangular sections of fabric used to add +fullness to the skirt consist of several pieces. In fact the two +sections used in the back are made from a different fabric, although it +is still a blue and white checked linen. Frugal use of scraps in linings +and hidden sections of decorative costume was common practice in the +18th century. The piecing of the bathing gown is further evidence of the +fact that it was a garment that had no ornamental purpose. + +[Illustration: Figure 6.--LINEN BATHING GOWN said to have been worn by +Martha Washington. (_Courtesy of The Mount Vernon Ladies' +Association._)] + +Of particular interest are the lead disks which are wrapped in linen and +attached near the hem next to the side seams by means of patches. No +doubt these weights were used to keep the gown in place when the bather +entered the water. + +The following account of bathing in Dover, England, in 1782 suggests how +the bathing gown might have been used at Berkeley Springs: + + The Ladies in a morning when they intend to bathe, put on a long + flannel gown under their other clothes, walk down to the beach, + undress themselves to the flannel, then they walk in as deep as + they please, and lay hold of the guides' hands, three or four + together sometimes. + + Then they dip over head twenty times perhaps; then they come + onto the shore where there are women that attend with towels, + cloaks, chairs, etc. The flannel is stripp'd off, wip'd dry, + etc. Women hold cloaks round them. They dress themselves and go + home.[27] + + [27] _Diary of John Crosier_, 1782, as quoted in C. WILLETT and + PHILLIS CUNNINGTON, _Handbook of English Costume in the + Eighteenth Century_ (London: Faber and Faber, 1957), p. 404. + +The earliest illustration showing costume worn in the United States for +fresh water bathing is dated 1810 (see fig. 2). Unfortunately the +painting reveals only that the bathing gowns were long and dark colored +in comparison with the white dresses of the period. + +An 1848 article which described, in detail, the fashionable dress called +for by each activity at summer resorts, concludes with the following +tantalizing paragraph: + + We have no space for an extended description of suitable + bathing-dresses. They may be procured at any of our town + establishments for the purpose. Much depends upon individual + taste in their arrangement, for uncouth as they often of + necessity are, they can be improved by a little tact.[28] + + [28] Loc. cit. (footnote 19). + +This is the only reference to American bathing costume of the second +quarter of the 19th century that the author has found at this time. +Nevertheless, an English source describes what must have been a +transitional style between the chemise-type bathing gown and the more +fitted costume of the 1850s. + +The _Workwoman's Guide_, published in London, 1840, included +instructions for making both a bathing gown and a bathing cap. Health +and modesty were the main considerations that influenced the choice of +color and type of material. + + Bathing gowns are made of blue or white flannel, stuff, + calimanco, or blue linen. As it is especially desirable that the + water should have free access to the person, and yet that the + dress should not cling to, or weigh down the bather, stuff or + calimanco are preferred to most other materials; the dark + coloured gowns are the best for several reasons, but chiefly + because they do not show the figure, and make the bather less + conspicuous than she would be in a white dress.[29] + + [29] A LADY, _The Workwoman's Guide_ (London: Simpkin, Marshall, and + Co., 1840), p. 61. + +The following details reveal that, in general, this 1840 bathing gown +starts as an unshaped garment similar to the gown attributed to Martha +Washington [brackets are mine]. + + As the width of the materials, of which a bathing gown is made, + varies, it is impossible to say of how many breadths it should + consist. The width at the bottom, when the gown is doubled, + should be about 15 nails [1 nail = 2¼ in.]: fold it like a + pinafore, slope 3½ nails for the shoulders, cut or open slits of + 3½ nails long for the armholes, set in plain sleeves 4½ nails + long, 3½ nails wide, and make a slit in front 5 nails long.[30] + + [30] Loc. cit. (footnote 29). + +The instructions for finishing this gown, however, show that the sleeves +were worn close around the wrists and that the fullness of the skirt was +secured at the waist by a belt. + + In making up, delicacy is the great object to be attended to. + Hem the gown at the bottom, gather it into a band at the top, + and run in strings; hem the opening and the bottom of the + sleeves and put in strings. A broad band should be sewed in + about half a yard from the top, to button round the waist.[31] + + [31] Loc. cit. (footnote 29). + +By the addition of the above details this type of bathing gown more +closely approximates the style of the long-skirted blouse of the 1850s +to be described later. + +In regard to the bathing cap we are told that, + + These are made of oil-silk, and are worn, when bathing, by + ladies who have long hair.... It is advisable, however, for + those who have not long hair, to bathe in plain linen caps, so + as to admit the water without the sand or grit, and thus the + bather, unless prohibited on account of health, enjoys all the + benefit of the shock without injuring the hair.[32] + + [32] Ibid., p. 68. + +The "Scene at Cape May" (fig. 3) shows women wearing long-skirted, +long-sleeved, belted gowns as well as head coverings similar to the type +described in _The Workwoman's Guide_. + +Thus during the period when bathing became popular as a medicinal +treatment, women wore loose, open gowns perhaps patterned after a common +undergarment, the chemise. Although this chemise-type bathing costume +must have been very comfortable when dry, its fullness was restrictive +when wet. The bather could only immerse herself in water which was all +that was necessary for the treatment. As the recreational possibilities +of bathing began to overshadow its health-giving properties, women's +bathing dresses also became more fitted, following the general +silhouette of women's fashions. + +[Illustration: SCENE AT CONEY ISLAND--SEA BATHING ILLUSTRATED. + +Figure 7.--SEA BATHING AT CONEY ISLAND, from _Frank Leslie's Illustrated +Newspaper_, September 1856. + +(Smithsonian photo 58437.)] + + +BIFURCATED BATHING DRESS + +During the first half of the 19th century in England and the United +States, a more tolerant attitude toward feminine exercise led women to +abandon the fiction that they were not bipedal while bathing. This +acknowledgment, however, was not fostered solely by the need for a more +functional bathing dress. It was first evidenced by a few daring +European women who wore lace-edged pantaloons trimmed with several rows +of tucking under their daytime dresses. The shorter, untrimmed, +knee-length drawers which quickly replaced the pantaloons, became an +unseen but essential item in the fashionable English lady's toilette of +the 1840s. These drawers, or a plainer version of the longer pantaloons, +were adapted not only to the female riding habit but the bathing dress +as well. An 1828 English source reported that "Many ladies when riding +wear silk drawers similar to what is worn when bathing."[33] With the +increased interest in physical exercise for women, ankle-length, open +pantaloons also were being worn in the 1840s with a long overdress as an +early form of gymnasium suit. This evidence of the early use of drawers +suggests that, like English ladies, women in the United States were +probably wearing a type of drawers beneath their nondescript bathing +gowns during the second quarter of the 19th century. There is some +slight support of this theory in the following stanza of a poem that +appeared in 1845: + + But go to the beach ere the morning be ended + And look at the bathers--oh what an array + The ladies in trowsers, the _gemmen_ in _blowses_ + E'en red flannel shirts are the "go" at Cape May.[34] + + [33] As quoted in C. WILLETT and PHILLIS CUNNINGTON, _The History of + Underclothes_ (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), p. 130. + + [34] "Cape May," _Godey's Lady's Book_ (December 1845), vol. 31, p. + 268. + +The rather crude but delightful sketch of seabathing at Coney Island in +1856 (fig. 7) shows the ladies wearing very full, ankle-length, trousers +with a sack top extending loosely only a few inches below the waist. +This type of bathing costume, which was primarily a bifurcated garment +instead of a skirted one, became the prevailing fashion as reported in +English women's magazines of the 1860s. + +In contrast to the originally European skirtless costume, the +Philadelphia publication, _Peterson's Magazine_, stated that bathing +dress should consist of a pair of drawers and a long-skirted dress. The +recommended drawers were full and confined at the ankle by a band that +was finished with a ruffle. These drawers were attached to a "body" and +fastened so that, even if the skirt washed up, the individual could not +possibly be exposed. The dress was made by pleating or gathering the +desired length of material onto a deep yoke with a separate belt +securing the fullness at the waist. The bottom of the hem was about +three inches above the ankle and was considered rather short. Loose +shirt sleeves were drawn around the wrist by a band which was finished +with a deep ruffle as a protection against the sun. According to this +article many women wore a small talma or cape which hid the figure to +some extent. It was recommended that the drawers, dress, and talma be +made of the same woolen material. + + Bathing-dresses, although generally very unbecoming can be made + to look very prettily with a little taste. If the dress is of a + plain color, such as grey, blue or brown, a trimming around the + talma, collar, yoke, ruffles etc ..., of crimson, green or + scarlet, is a great addition.[35] + + [35] "Fashions for August, Bathing Dresses," _Peterson's Magazine_ + (August 1856), vol. 30, p. 145. + +To complete a bathing toilette the following items were considered +necessary: a pair of large lisle thread gloves, an oil cap to protect +the hair from the water, a straw hat to shield the face from the sun, +and gum overshoes for tender feet. + +[Illustration: Figure 8.--BATHING DRESS, c. 1855. (_Courtesy of +Philadelphia Museum of Art._ Photograph by A. J. Wyatt, staff +photographer.)] + +The red, tan, and blue-green checked bathing dress shown in figure 8 is +jauntily trimmed with crimson braid edging the collar, belt, and wrist +and ankle bands. This costume is a variation of the style described +previously. The drawers, unlike those described in _Peterson's +Magazine_, are sewn to a linen band with linen suspenders attached. The +unfitted, unshaped skirt (8 ft. 8 in. in circumference) is pulled in at +the waist by a belt attached to the center back. A similar technique for +forming a waistline is described in _The Workwoman's Guide_ of 1840. + +Women's magazines in the United States from the third quarter of the +19th century show illustrations of bathing costume, but in many +instances these publications used European fashion plates. _Harper's +Bazar_, (spelled thus until 1929) particularly in its early years, used +fashion plates and pattern supplements from its German predecessor _Der +Bazar_. Thus, in one issue one can find a fashion plate showing the +predominantly bifurcated European bathing suit and, in a column on New +York fashions, a separate description of long-skirted bathing dresses +with trousers. During the same period _Peterson's Magazine_ had +illustrations previously used in the London publication, _Queen's +Magazine_. + +American women seem to have accepted the majority of styles shown in +European fashion plates, except for the skirtless bathing suits. The +writer of an 1868 column on New York fashions sought to convince his +readers to try the more daring European style although he grudgingly +admitted that the "Bathing suits made with trousers and blouse waist +without skirt are objected to by many ladies as masculine and +fast...."[36] This style was in fact, very similar to the costume worn +by men when they bathed with the ladies. A year later, the writer of the +same fashion column had given up the campaign to dress all women in the +skirtless suits and admitted that these imports "... are worn by expert +swimmers, who do not wish to be encumbered with bulky clothing."[37] +Such practical bathing dress was thus limited to a very small number of +progressive women. + + [36] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (August 8, 1868), vol. 1, + no. 41, p. 643. + + [37] Ibid. (July 10, 1869), vol. 2, no. 28, p. 435. + +The majority, consisting of those who were strictly bathers, wore the +ankle-length drawers beneath a long dress as described or illustrated in +the majority of sources that originated in the United States. Why was +the European bathing suit not fully adopted by American women? +Differences between the bathing customs of the two continents +undoubtedly encouraged the development of different dress. While men and +women in the United States bathed together freely at the seashore during +the latter half of the 19th century, this practice was not widely +accepted in England until the early 1900s. In the presence of men, +American women probably felt compelled to retain their more concealing +dress and drawers. + +In England swimming seems to have been more popular among women than it +was in the United States. While encouraging its readers to swim, during +the late 1860s, _Queen's Magazine_ used forceful language of a kind that +was not found in American publications until the late 19th century. If +swimming was more acceptable as a feminine exercise in England it is +understandable why English women were more receptive to a functional, +skirtless bathing suit--especially since it was worn only in the +presence of other women. + +In 1858, Winslow Homer, who was later to become a well-known American +painter, was welcomed into the society at Newport until it became +apparent that he wanted to sketch the bathers for a weekly newspaper +(see fig. 4). So great were the ensuing objections that he was permitted +to complete his sketches "... provided he depicted the bathers only in +the water and only above the waistline and without divulging the +identity of the bathers."[38] + + [38] B. BROOKE, "Bathing-dress with Hat and Gloves," _Hobbies_ (August + 1958), vol. 63, p. 90. + +As can be seen in figure 4, these sketches serve more as a testament of +Homer's fancy than as an accurate historical statement on style. The two +feminine legs exposed in the water from just below the knee to the toe +and the feminine head coverings appear to be anachronisms. According to +several other illustrations of the period, these women were undoubtedly +wearing long drawers. The young artist at 22, however, has been +described as having an eye for feminine beauty and a sense of fashion. +He seems to have exploited to the full the decorative possibilities of +hoop skirts blown by the breeze or agitated by some pretty accident to +discreetly reveal a trim ankle. A drama of breeze versus long skirt +appears with the small feminine figure in the left background of this +print. The force of the waves and the motion of the frolicking bathers +gave the artist opportunity to show two more pretty accidents. The only +head covering he showed for feminine bathers was a ruffled cap that +framed the face. Other sources show Newport bathers wearing the less +attractive wide-brimmed straw hat (fig. 9). The straw headgear worn over +these caps seems more likely since Newport's fashionable belles would +surely have sacrificed appearances and worn a straw hat to avoid an +unfashionable sunburn and tan. + +[Illustration: Figure 9.--BATHING HAT of natural color and purple straw, +c. 1880. (Smithsonian photo P-65409.)] + +Nevertheless, Homer's sketch reflects characteristics seen in certain +surviving examples from the 1860s--namely that the top was becoming more +fitted, being attached completely to a belt with the fuller skirt +pleated or gathered to the bottom edge of the belt. In the Design +Laboratory Collection of the Brooklyn Museum there is an 1860 black +poplin specimen that may be a bathing dress. This example is trimmed at +the shoulder seam with epaulets, an example of the extent to which +fashion was finally playing a part in bathing costume.[39] + + [39] Photograph and pattern appears in Blanch Payne, _History of + Costume_ (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), pp. 518, 583-584. + +The dresses described above appear peculiar not only to 20th century +eyes, but they also seem to have amused mid-19th century correspondents. +One writer in 1857 declared that, + + We don't think a man could identify his own wife when she comes + out of the bathing-house. A plump figure enters, surrounded with + a multitude of rustly flounces and scarcely able to squeeze an + enormous hoop through the door. She is absent a few minutes, and + presto change! out comes a tall lank apparition, wrapped in the + scanty folds of something that looks more like a superannuated + night-gown than anything else, and a battered straw-chapeau + knocked down over the eyes, and stalks down towards the beach + with the air and gait of a Tartar chieftain![40] [fig. 10.] + + [40] "An Excursion to Long Branch," _Frank Leslie's Illustrated + Newspaper_ (August 22, 1857), vol. 4, no. 90, p. 182. + +Another writer felt that he + + ... must say--even in the columns of _Frank Leslie's + Illustrated_--that they don't look very picturesque or pretty + when _a la Naiade_.... Rather limp, sacks tied in the middle, + eel-bottles, hydropathic coalheavers and "longshoremen," and + preternaturally dilapidated Bloomers, would appear to be the + ideals aimed at.[41] [fig. 11.] + + [41] Loc. cit. (footnote 18). + +This use of the term "Bloomers," referring to long full drawers or +trousers, is a reminder of how similar the 1855 bathing gown with +drawers (see fig. 8) was to the reform dress introduced in 1848 and worn +by Amelia Bloomer, the feminist, in 1852. + +Despite the evident use of a new waistline treatment, the most popular +bathing costume of the 1870s, according to _Harper's Bazar_, continued +to feature the yoke blouse that reached at least to the knee. This +combination of blouse and skirt was held in position at the waist by a +belt. The high neck was finished with a sailor collar or a standing +pleated frill, while the long sleeves and full Turkish trousers, +buttoned on the side of the ankle, concealed the limbs. In 1873 a column +on New York fashions reported an effort to popularize short-sleeved, +low-throated suits then in favor at European bathing places and which +had been illustrated in the _Bazar_. Nevertheless, the writer hedged +this report by adding that + + It is thought best, however, to provide an extra pair of long + sleeves that may be buttoned on or basted in the short puffs + that are sewn in the arm holes. Sometimes a small cape fastening + closely about the throat is also added.[42] + + [42] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (July 19, 1873), vol. 6, + no. 29, p. 451. + +Nevertheless, sketches of bathing scenes from the seventies indicate +that some American women wore even shorter sleeves and trousers than +those prescribed by the fashion magazines. + +Linen and wool fabrics were both suggested in the 1840s, but by the +1870s flannel was most frequently used for bathing dresses, with serge +also being recommended. Navy blue, and to a lesser extent, white, gray, +scarlet, and brown were popular colors in checks as well as solid +colors trimmed with white, red, gray, or blue worsted braid. + +[Illustration: Figure 10.--"HOW SHE WENT IN," from _Harper's Bazar_, +August 1870. (Smithsonian photo 61585A.)] + +Bathing mantles or cloaks were worn to conceal the moist figure when +crossing the beach. These garments were made of Turkish toweling with +wide sleeves and hoods, and were so long as "to barely escape" the +ground. + +In 1873 one good bathing cap was described as an oiled silk bag-crown +cap large enough to hold the hair loosely. The frill around the edge was +bound with colored braid. Many ladies preferred, however, to let their +hair hang loose and under a wide-brimmed hat of coarse straw tied down +on the sides to protect their skin from the sun (fig. 9). + +Bathing shoes or slippers were generally worn when the shore was rough +and uneven. In 1871 manila sandals were worn, but the most functional +bathing shoes are said to have been high buskins of thick unbleached +cotton duck with cork soles. They were secured with checked worsted +braid. Two years later there were bathing shoes of white duck or sail +canvas with manila soles. Slippers for walking in the sand were "mules" +or merely toes and soles made of flannel, braided to match the cloak, +and sewn to cork soles. + +Throughout this period the social aspect of bathing predominated over +the therapeutic goals and women were making a greater effort to +transform their bathing garments into attractive and functional outfits. +Motivated by the presence of men at the seashore and by the competition +with other women for masculine attention, ladies were more concerned +with the style of their bathing dresses and appropriate trimmings. Thus +bathing costume joined the ranks of other fashions described in women's +magazines. + +[Illustration: Figure 11.--"HOW SHE CAME OUT," from _Harper's Bazar_, +August 1870. (Smithsonian photo 61585B.)] + +Now that women were frolicking in the water rather than simply being +dunked several times, their costume became somewhat more functional. +Long trousers gave them greater freedom in the water although the skirts +which continued to be worn, tended to negate this improvement. Even as +early as the 1870s there were efforts to shorten sleeves and eliminate +high necklines. This trend to make bathing dress more practical +increased in momentum toward the end of the century. + +[Illustration: Figure 12.--BATHING COSTUMES from a supplement to _The +Tailor's Review_, July 1895. + +(_Courtesy of Library of Congress._)] + + +PRINCESS STYLE BATHING DRESS + +Although attitudes toward sports were more enlightened by the 1880s, +many women continued to wear the old bathing dress with its belted +blouse extending to a long skirt and a pair of trousers. As an alternate +to this garb, the "princess style" was developed with the blouse and +trousers cut in one piece or else sewn permanently to the same belt. A +separate skirt extending below the knee was buttoned at the waist to +conceal the figure. This new style in bathing costume was probably +derived from an innovation in women's underwear. During the late 1870s a +new style of undergarment, the "combination" of chemise and drawers, had +come into use. Petticoats could be fastened to buttons sewn around the +waist of the combination. This streamlining of undergarments helped the +lady of fashion to maintain a desirably svelte figure. Apparently the +advantages of this streamlining were obvious, because it was not long +before women were quietly adapting this style to bathing dresses. By the +1890s the skirt was often omitted for swimming (fig. 12), giving the +more active women more freedom in the water. Following popular dress +styles, the top of the bathing costume was bloused over the belt. The +sailor collar, either large or small, was a great favorite, but a +straight standing collar with rows of white braid was also worn. + +The "princess style" was not the only innovation available in bathing +dress. _Harper's Bazar_ reported in 1881 that imported French bathing +suits[43] for ladies were made without sleeves, since any covering on +the arm interfered with the freedom desirable for swimming. +Nevertheless, according to other contemporary fashion descriptions, +American bathing suits retained their long sleeves until the early 1880s +when the foreign fashion of short sleeves came to the United States. In +1885 it was reported that + + The sleeves may be the merest 'caps' four or five inches deep + under the arm, curved narrow toward the top, and lapped there or + they may be half-long and straight, reaching to the elbows, or + else they may be the regular coat sleeves covering the arms to + the wrist. With the short sleeves it is customary to add the + sleeves cut from a gauze vest to give the arm some protection + from the sun.[44] + + [43] The term "bathing suit" as opposed to "bathing dress" came into + use in the last quarter of the 19th century when the bifurcated + bathing garment with a shorter skirt was widely accepted. The two + terms, however, continued to be used interchangeably, with + "bathing dress" appearing less frequently. + + [44] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (July 4, 1885), vol. 18, + no. 27, p. 427. + +Sleeves were pushed up in 1890 and puffed high about the shoulders by +means of elastic tape in the hem. By 1893 fashion reports acknowledged +that sleeve length was a matter of individual choice. + +Despite this neat resolution of the diminishing sleeve, contemporary +sketches of bathing scenes indicate that some women in the United States +were wearing the shorter sleeves even earlier. + +Short full trousers, reaching just below the knee, accompanied by +knee-length skirts--sometimes worn even shorter--succeeded the long +Turkish trousers and ankle-length skirt. As the trousers diminished in +length, long stockings or bathing shoes with long stocking tops became a +necessary part of the bathing costume to cover the lower limbs, +particularly in mixed bathing (see fig. 1). The stockings, which were +cotton or wool, plain or fancy, and of any color or combination of +colors in keeping with the costume, were worn with a variety of bathing +shoes, sandals, or slippers when bathing off a rocky shore. Foot +coverings were usually made of white canvas; the slippers were held on +by a spiral arrangement of braid or ribbon about the ankles, while the +laced shoes were often made with heavy cork soles. A gaiter shoe or +combination shoe and stocking was made of waterproof cloth, laced up the +sides, and reached to about the knees. Low rubber shoes were also worn. + +Bathing caps of waxed linen or oiled silk were used to protect the hair. +They had whale bone in the brim and could be adjusted by drawstrings in +the back. Blue, white, or ecru rubber hats were also used. These caps +had large full crowns--which held in all the hair--and wired brims. A +wide-brimmed rough straw hat, tied on with a strip of trimming braid or +with ribbon, was sometimes worn as protection against the sun (fig. 9). + +Bathing mantles like those of the 1870s were still being worn by the +late 19th century and these were frequently trimmed with colored braid. +Cotton tapes sewn in parallel rows, mohair braid, or strips of flannel +were still being used to make the bathing dress more attractive. + +Navy blue and white, as well as ecru, maroon, gray, and olive were +popular colors for the bathing dress. In 1890 the writer of a fashion +column thought it pertinent to add that "... black bathing suits are +worn as a matter of choice, not merely by those dressing in +mourning."[45] Apparently the wearing of black no longer had this +exclusive significance when bathing, but prior to 1890 it did. + + [45] Ibid. (July 5, 1890), vol. 23, no. 27, p. 523. + +As women became more active in the water and were learning to swim they +began to accept more practical changes in bathing costume. Not only the +style, as described previously, but also the fabric was considered for +its functional characteristics. Flannel was still widely used but was +being replaced by serge which was not as heavy when wet. Another +indication of this trend was that stockinet, a knitted material, was +gaining in popularity at the end of the century. + +The "princess style" of the early 1890s combined the drawers and bodice +in one garment: the separate skirt fell just short of the ends of the +drawers which covered the knees. By the mid-1890s, however, the drawers +which were now called knickerbockers, were shortened so as to be +completely covered by the knee-length skirt. These knickerbockers were +either attached to the waist in the popular "princess style" or they +were fastened to the waist by a series of flat bone buttons. + +During this same period, the mid-1890s, knitted, cotton tights were +sometimes worn in place of knickerbockers. Bathing tights differed from +the knickerbockers in that they were hemmed rather than gathered on an +elastic band at the lower edge and that they were not attached to the +waist. When tights were used they were completely concealed by a +one-piece, knee-length bathing dress. The use of the more streamlined +bathing tights was another step toward more functional bathing costume. +Despite these improvements, most women continued to wear stockings, +usually black, when they bathed or swam in public. The dictates of +fashion and standards of modesty continued to conflict with practical +considerations. + +[Illustration: Figure 13.--BATHING DRESS OF BLACK "MOHAIR," c. 1900. +(Smithsonian photo 60383.)] + +As with street dress, corsets seem to have been an important though +unseen bathing article necessary for maintaining smart posture. In 1896 +it was reported that + + Unless a woman is very slender, bathing corsets should be worn. + If they are not laced tightly they are a help instead of a + hindrance to swimming, and some support is needed for a figure + that is accustomed to wearing stays.[46] + + [46] Ibid. (June 13, 1896), vol. 29, no. 24, p. 503. + +While describing the bathing dresses available in 1910 an article noted: +"Some of these are made up with ... princess forms that are boned so as +to do away with the bathing corset."[47] + + [47] Ibid. (July 1910), vol. 43, no. 7, p. 552. + +The bodice of the bathing costume continued to be bloused, but by 1905 +it was modified to be merely loose. An article appearing in 1896 noted +that bathing suits should be cut high in the neck, not tight around the +throat, but close enough to prevent burning by the sun. The sailor +collar continued to be used during the late 1890s but became less +fashionable shortly after the turn of the century. Nevertheless there +had to be some white around the neck for the bathing dress to be +considered smart. The puffed sleeves, which had become popular in the +late 1890s were modified in breadth and length to allow free use of the +muscles in swimming (fig. 13). + +In 1897 fashion magazines were suggesting that skirts of bathing dresses +looked best when the front breadth was shaped narrower toward the belt, +while by 1902 the skirts were fitted over the hips in order to delineate +the figure. In 1905 pleated skirts again became fashionable, although +flared skirts were still acceptable. + +Dark blue and black were the popular colors, although white, red, gray, +and green were also used. Flannel was no longer recommended for bathing +dress; serge and "mohair"--a fabric with a cotton warp and a mohair or +alpaca weft--were widely used. The impractical bathing dress of silk +fabric was worn by those who could afford this extravagance; thus, the +conspicuous consumption of the "leisure class" was even found at the +beaches. + +Bathing hats were still being worn but it was considered more +fashionable to wear a rubber or oil silk cap covered with a bright silk +turban when there was a surf. For the bather who seldom ventured very +far into the water the most fashionable practice was to have no covering +at all. + +Throughout the 19th century bathing costume followed an impelling course +toward becoming more functional. As the popularity of recreational +bathing and then swimming for women increased, the number of yards of +fabric required to make a bathing dress decreased. Nevertheless, by the +1900s, many women knew how to swim, but the majority were still bathers. +Thus bathing suits continued in use through the first quarter of the +20th century. + + + + +Swimming Costume + + +Bathing costume did not evolve gracefully into the swim suit, nor was +there an abrupt replacement of one garment for the other. Instead, a +garb designed for swimming emerged in the 19th century as tentatively +and as poorly received as had the suggestion that women should be active +in the water. The growing popularity of swimming and the changing status +of women eventually made it possible for the swimming suit to replace +the bathing suit in the 1920s. By the 1930s, however, this trend was +accelerated by a growing advertising and ready-to-wear clothing +industry. Thus a history of the swimming costume tends to divide itself +into two sections: early swimming suits and the influence of the swim +suit industry. + + +EARLY SWIMMING SUITS + +The earliest reference to swimming costume I have found was in 1869. At +this date swimming in the United States was considered a masculine +skill, exercise, and recreation; only men were provided with a real +opportunity to swim at popular watering places. As described previously, +_Harper's Bazar_ reported that American women in general rejected the +European bathing suit made with long trousers and a skirtless waist. +Nevertheless, this costume was "... worn by expert swimmers, who do not +wish to be encumbered with bulky clothing."[48] + + [48] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (July 10, 1869), vol. 2, + no. 28, p. 435. + +In the 1870s the rare descriptions of this more functional +garment--called "swimming suit" even at this early date--were limited to +a sentence or two buried within long columns of fine print describing +popular bathing apparel. One mentions a "... single knitted worsted +garment, fitting the figure, with waist and trousers in one."[49] +Another was made without sleeves as "one garment, the blouse and +trousers being cut all in one, like the sleeping garments worn by small +children."[50] These more practical bifurcated garments probably derived +from the European suit of the 1860s that had been rejected by the +majority of American women. For example, an English source reported that +in 1866 the following garment was worn: "... Swimming Costume, a body +and trousers cut in one, secures perfect liberty of action and does not +expose the figure."[51] + + [49] Ibid. (July 13, 1872), vol. 5, no. 28, p. 459. + + [50] Ibid. (July 25, 1874), vol. 7, no. 30, p. 475. + + [51] As quoted in C. WILLETT CUNNINGTON, _English Women's Clothing in + the 19th Century_ (New York: Thomas Yoseloff, 1958), p. 225. + +The descriptions of American swimming suits, however brief, offered +evidence that the pastime was growing in popularity with women. +Generally speaking, 19th century women's magazines were mere +disseminators of fine and decorous ideas and practices for well-mannered +ladies; their editors were not innovators. With such an editorial policy +it is understandable that these magazines would not, as a rule, +publicize trends of popular origin until they were fairly well +established. The skirtless swimming suit of the 1870s was no doubt more +common in the United States than its meager description in _Harper's +Bazar_ would seem to indicate. + +As long as feminine swimming was not generally accepted, however, +efforts to develop practical swimming suits remained isolated owing to +the lack of communication between manufacturer and consumer and to +traditional attitudes. Feminine interest in swimming and physical +activities threatened belief in the "weaker-sex" that contributed to +maintaining the traditional masculine and feminine roles; efforts to +develop functional swimming dress also attacked established standards of +feminine modesty. These challenges to the status quo were met with the +weapon of the complacent majority--silence. Consequently, from the third +quarter of the 19th century, when we find the first reference to a +specialized garment for swimming in the United States, writings on +swimming costume appeared infrequently until the 1920s. + +In 1886 two "ladies' bathing jerseys" and two bathing suits of the +traditional type appeared in the _First Illustrated Catalogue of Knitted +Bathing Suits_ of J. J. Pfister Company in San Francisco. The captions +over the illustrations leave no question that the briefer bathing +jerseys were intended for swimming while the others were for bathing. +These jerseys--form-fitting tunics that were mid-thigh in length--were +made with high necks and cap sleeves. Underneath this garment women wore +trunks that extended to the knee and stockings; there was also the +alternate choice of tights, a combination of trunks and stockings. To +complete the outfit the feminine reader was encouraged to buy a knitted +skull cap. + +Apparently these bathing jerseys were successful; three, instead of two, +jerseys appeared in the same catalog in 1890. It is obvious from this +later catalog, however, that there was a greater demand for bathing +dresses since twelve designs of the skirted costume were featured as +opposed to the two dresses in the first issue. + +[Illustration: Figure 14.--THE RECOMMENDED COSTUME FOR SWIMMING from J. +Parmly Paret, _The Woman's Book of Sports_, 1901. (Smithsonian photo +58436.)] + +Even by the early 20th century it is difficult to find specific +references to a swimming suit in women's magazines; only occasionally +does a concern with swimming obtrude into the traditional descriptions +of bathing dress. In _The Woman's Book of Sports_, however, J. Parmly +Paret was specific about the requirements for a suitable swimming +costume in 1901. + + It is particularly important that nothing tight should be worn + while swimming, no matter how fashionable a dress may be for + bathing. The exercise requires the greatest freedom, and a + swimming costume should never include corsets, tight sleeves, or + a skirt below the knees. The freedom of the shoulders is the + most important of all, but anything tight around the body + interferes with the breathing and the muscles of the back, while + a long skirt--even one a few inches below the knees--binds the + legs constantly in making their strokes.[52] + + [52] J. PARMLY PARET, _The Woman's Book of Sports_ (New York: D. + Appleton & Co., 1901), p. 74. + +Although this costume (fig. 14) more closely resembles the traditional +bathing dress than the jersey described previously, this discussion +illustrates the growing dichotomy between bathing dress and swimming +dress and between fashionable styles and functional styles. + +Photographs of East coast beach scenes in 1903 show a few women wearing +costumes different from the black or navy blue bathing dress worn by the +majority. These independent spirits seem to be wearing close-fitting +knitted trunks that cover the knees or, when with stockings, come within +an inch or two above the knee. Above these trunks they appear to be +wearing knitted one-piece tunics or belted blouses that cover the hips. +This costume, sleeveless or short-sleeved, and with a simplified +neckline, must have been the functional suit of its day. + +An important impetus was given to the development of the swimming suit +with the entrance of women into swimming as a competitive sport. On +September 5, 1909, Adeline Trapp wore a one-piece knitted swimming suit +when she became the first woman to swim across the East River in New +York, through the treacherous waters of Hell Gate. Both the swimming +suit and the swim were part of a campaign devised by Wilbert +Longfellow--of the U.S. Volunteer Life Saving Corps--to encourage women +to learn to swim. + +Adeline Trapp was a summer employee of the Life Saving Corps in 1909. +Mr. Longfellow saw in the 20-year-old Brooklyn school teacher a +respectable young woman who could be a source of publicity. He ordered +her to get a one-piece swimming suit for the swim. As early as 1899 in +England, a woman participating in competitions organized by the Amateur +Swimming Association could have worn a one-piece, skirtless, knitted +costume with a shaped sleeve at least three inches long, a slightly +scooped neck, and legs that extended to within three inches of the knee. +Mr. Longfellow may have had this English suit in mind. He might have +known of similar suits in the United States or he might have simply +wanted to free Adeline of yards of fabric to make her more competitive +with male swimmers. Nevertheless, Adeline Trapp did not know that the +English suits existed, nor did she know where she could find one. She +spent many hours going from one American manufacturer to another trying +on men's knitted suits. She found that they were all cut too low at the +neck and armholes and did not cover enough of the legs to preclude +criticism. At this point a friend who worked for a stocking manufacturer +offered to get her a suitable costume from England. This costume, a +knitted, gray cotton suit--whether originally for a man or woman in +England is not known--was the one Adeline wore when she swam Hell Gate. + +Although more than thirty men attempted the swim, the fact that a woman +accomplished the feat made newspaper headlines. Following this event, +Miss Trapp received a terse letter from the Brooklyn School Board +stating that they thought it improper for an educator of Brooklyn +children to appear in public so scantily dressed in a one-piece swimming +costume. For her future swims Adeline Trapp was careful to have someone +carry a blanket to throw over her as she emerged from the water.[53] + + [53] Telephone interview with Adeline Trapp Mulhenberg, May 1966. + +In 1910, Annette Kellerman arrived in the United States from Australia +by way of England. For her fancy diving exhibitions she wore sleeveless +one-piece knitted swimming tights that covered her from neck to toe--a +costume she had probably adopted in England. + +The decade from 1910 to 1920 was a crucial period in the history of +bathing and swimming costume. Popular attitudes were changing in favor +of the woman who swam but, as frequently occurs in social reforms, there +was a cultural lag between public opinion and the policies of +institutions. The Red Cross, which began its excellent water safety +program in 1914, taught women to swim but did not admit women as Life +Saving Corps members until 1920. Symbolic of the conflict between old +and new attitudes were the relative roles of bathing and swimming +costume during this period. As Annette Kellerman described them: + + There are two kinds ... those that are adapted for use in water, + and those that are unfit for use except on dry land. If you are + going to swim, wear a water bathingsuit. But if you are merely + going to play on the beach, and pose for the camera fiends, you + may safely wear the dry land variety.... I am certain that there + isn't a single reason under the sun why everybody should not + wear lightweight suits. Anyone who persuades you to wear the + heavy skirty kind is endangering your life.[54] + + [54] ANNETTE KELLERMAN, _How to Swim_ (New York: George H. Doran + Company, 1918), p. 47. + +Chic women's magazines, however, were still reluctant to admit in their +fashion pages that a more utilitarian costume existed. The June 1, 1917 +issue of _Vogue_ reported that there were two kinds of bathing suits: a +loose straight suit and those on surplice lines, "... which hold their +place by virtue of being so very becoming."[55] + + [55] _Vogue_ (June 1, 1917), vol. 49, no. 11, p. 85. + +The most popular of these, the surplice, was not a novelty of the season +but a continuation of 19th century bathing suit styles. Fashion +illustrations show that the hemline of the skirt was approaching the +middle of the knee, with the bloomers remaining hidden. There was also a +revival of the style that permitted the bloomers to show several inches +below the skirt. In this case the bloomers reached the knee and the +skirt was several inches shorter. Both versions were shown with short +sleeves or cap sleeves, or sleeveless; "V" necklines with collars and +square necklines were widely used. The more fashionable creations were +made of silk taffeta or "surf satin," while the majority were made of +"mohair," wool jersey, worsted, or closely woven cotton. Black and navy +blue were unquestionably the favorite colors. + +The loose straight suit, which evidently gained its inspiration from the +chemise frock of the period, had no waistline and hung straight from the +shoulders (fig. 15); a belt or sash was frequently looped below the +natural waistline on the hips. The chemise-type of bathing suit differed +from the surplice only in having no fitted waist and requiring less +fabric. + +[Illustration: Figure 15.--BLACK SILK BATHING DRESS, 1923. + +(Smithsonian photo P-65412.)] + +In the June 15, 1917 issue, _Vogue_ modified its position of two weeks +earlier to acknowledge that there was a third style of costume worn in +the water. Again, the descriptions of the surplice and chemise-type +bathing suits were accompanied by numerous illustrations. No drawings, +however, were published to show the knitted jersey suit that was +described as "... usually sleeveless, quite short and fairly straight +..." and "... intended for the woman who swims expertly."[56] + + [56] Ibid. (June 15, 1917), vol. 49, no. 12, p. 67. + +As late as the early 1920s, the fashion pages of _Harper's Bazar_ and +_Vogue_ were concentrated on the bathing suits, aiming at readers +involved in the social life of the seaside resorts--lounging about the +beach with occasional splashing in the water. The growing numbers of +women who wanted swimming suits, however, had only to turn to the +advertising sections of these same magazines to find that even in 1915 +such shops as Bonwit Teller & Co. and B. Altman & Co. were advertising +knitted swimming suits. + +In June 1916, _Delineator_ solved the dilemma of bathing versus swimming +costume in an intriguing article written to sell a pattern for a bathing +costume. In description and presentation of illustrations, the article +emphasized a costume with "all the features essential to a practical +swimming-suit."[57] The blouse and bloomers were attached at the waist +in this garment which had a square neckline and no skirt or sleeves. +Made up in wool jersey, this would have been a practical swimming +costume for the period. But this was not the only style available from +this one pattern. The following variations were included: a sailor +collar on a "V" neckline; a high-standing collar, long sleeves; and a +detachable skirt with the fullness either pleated or gathered into a +waistband, to be worn long to the knees or just short enough to show +several inches of the bloomer. In this way _Delineator_ succeeded in +satisfying nearly every degree of conservatism--an amazing +accomplishment. + + [57] "For the Modern Mermaid," _Delineator_ (June 1916), vol. 38, no. + 6, p. 52. + +The spring edition of _Sears, Roebuck and Co. Catalog_ for 1916 offered +a one-piece, or "California-style," knitted worsted bathing suit with +the underpiece sewn to a skirt. This costume was less elaborate than the +other dresses shown, although it was still knee length. The 1918 spring +catalog showed two one-piece knitted outfits suitable for swimming in +striking contrast to the surplice bathing dresses that were also +offered. By 1920 all of the bathing costumes illustrated in the _Sears, +Roebuck and Co. Catalog_ were of the more abbreviated and functional +type. + +In 1918 Annette Kellerman recommended that serious swimmers wear +close-fitting swimming tights or the two-piece suits commonly worn by +men. Being quick to admit that this costume would not be tolerated at +all beaches, she told dedicated swimmers to + + ... get one-piece tights anyway and wear over the tights the + lightest garment you can get. It should be a loose sleeveless + garment hung from the shoulders. Never have a tight waist band. + It is a hindrance. Also on beaches where stockings are enforced + your one-piece undergarment should have feet, so that the + separate stocking and its attendant garter is abolished.[58] + + [58] Loc. cit. (footnote 54). + +[Illustration: Figure 16.--ONE-PIECE SWIMMING SUIT OF KNITTED WOOL, c. +1918. (Smithsonian photo P-65413.)] + +Knitted swimming suits found in advertisements of the period were either +one-piece or two-piece; the trunks were attached or separate, but they +always extended a few inches below the brief skirt. Although this +costume could be considered sleeveless, in some examples the suit was +built up under the arm--a concession to the demands of modesty (fig. +16). The scooped or "V" neckline with no collar was relatively high; in +order to put on or remove the suit it was unbuttoned at one shoulder. + +It was this type of swimming costume which evolved into the garment that +dominated the fashion pages of the mid-1920s. + +Changes in costume brought about by the acceptance of swimming also +affected leg covering. By 1920 fashion pages showed stockings that +reached only to the calf and many advertisements for the abbreviated +knitted bathing suits presented the lower leg covered with only the high +laced bathing shoe (fig. 17) or, in a few cases, bare. Bathing slippers +were black satin or black or white canvas held on the feet by ribbon +criss-crossed up the leg to tie at mid-calf. Shoes were of satin or +canvas, laced in the front to mid-calf. + +There was a wide variety of colorful rubber caps; some were gathered on +a band or with a ruffle while others were closely fitted with brims. +Also popular was a close-fitting rubber cap with a colorful scarf tied +around it; swimmers did without the scarf. + +Despite the distinction between the two types of bathing apparel, the +beach cloak continued to be used by both the serious swimmer and those +who stayed safely in the shallows. Some bathing wraps had large collars +and were only mid-calf in length. Colorful beach hats, beach parasols, +bags, and blankets were used, particularly by the bather who seldom got +wet. + +The acceptance of swimming as a feminine activity provided an impetus +for the use of the knitted swimming suit; but standards of modesty had +to change before this suit could gain wide acceptance. Bathing dresses +of the 19th century had been designed to cover, conceal, and obscure not +only the torso but the limbs as well. The swimming suit that was gaining +acceptance in the early 1920s not only revealed the arms and a good part +of the legs, but actually dared to follow the lines of the torso. +Contemporary descriptions, that seem amusingly cautious today, included +such statements as "... all Annette Kellerman Bathing Attire is +distinguished by an incomparable, daring beauty of fit that always +remains refined."[59] Even less cautious was a statement that these +bathing suits were "famous ... for their perfect fit and exquisite, +plastic beauty of line."[60] + + [59] _Harper's Bazar_ (June 1920), vol. 55, no. 6, p. 138. + + [60] Ibid. (June 1921), 54th year, no. 2504, p. 101. + +The growing numbers of women who wore the new styles of bathing dress +were a cause of concern to self-appointed guardians of decency. In 1917 +the convention of the American Association of Park Superintendents at +New Orleans adopted a series of bathing regulations for city beaches +which dealt with the problems of the changing bathing suit. In general +these regulations specified that "... No all-white or flesh-colored +suits are permitted or suits that expose the chest lower than a line +drawn on a level with the arm pits."[61] In regard to ladies' bathing +suits these men agreed that + + Blouse and bloomer suits may be worn with or without stockings, + provided the blouse has quarter-arm sleeves or close-fitting arm + holes, and provided the bloomers are full and not shorter than + four inches above the knee.[62] + + [61] "Bathing Regulations for City Beaches," _American City_ (May + 1917), vol. 16, no. 5, p. 537. + + [62] Loc. cit. (footnote 61). + +Regulations for knitted suits were similar, with the added caution that +the skirt hem could be no more than two inches above the lower edge of +the trunks. As late as 1923 these regulations were in effect at public +beaches in Cleveland and Chicago. + +By 1923 a permanent change was occurring in the design of beach apparel. +The chemise-style bathing dress of black taffeta or satin still appeared +in the fashion magazines (fig. 15), but by 1929 it had disappeared. The +result of the struggle between the fancy bathing suit and the plain +knitted suit became obvious even in the popular magazines of the period. +In the opening paragraphs of a short story, Shirley, the villainess, +donned a smart bathing suit of puffy black taffeta, with a +patent-leather belt and a scarlet scarf, and baked in the shadow of a +big umbrella. Margaret, the heroine, in a plain knitted suit and black +cap was intent only upon diving, plunging, and splashing for her own +enjoyment. In another story a young lady, who came out of the sea +wearing a "... bathing suit so scanty it seemed a mere gesture flung +carelessly to the proprieties ..." described herself as a modern young +woman.[63] + + [63] JANE PRIDE, "Pick-up," _Delineator_ (May 1927), vol. 110, no. 5, + p. 15. + +In the early twenties advertisements capitalized on the functional +characteristics of swimming suits. A 1923 advertisement declared: + + No! No! Not a bathing suit! No! The Wil Wite is a swimming suit. + The difference is great--very great. A bathing suit is something + in which to "Sun" oneself and wear on the beach. A swimming suit + is a garment made expressly for those who swim. It is free from + frills and furbelows. It follows the form with the same + sincerity that a neat silk stocking clings to a trim ankle. It + fits when dry or wet ... it is a real swimming suit.[64] + + [64] _Harper's Bazar_ (June 1923), 56th year, no. 2528, p. 5. + +The knitted swimming suit which achieved dominance over the bathing suit +in the 1920s was similar to its earlier version except that both the +armhole and the neckline were lower. This made it possible to put on the +suit without unbuttoning one of the straps at the shoulder--a feature +that was omitted in this newer style. Sometimes a sash was looped +loosely around the waist; a geometrically shaped monogram provided a +smart decoration. The affluent swimmer could distinguish herself from +the masses by wearing silk jersey. During the last half of this decade +women coquettishly adopted a man's swimming suit, consisting of a +striped sleeveless jersey shirt with dark colored trunks and a white +belt. + +[Illustration: Figure 17.--BATHING SHOES, 1910. (Smithsonian photo +P-65417.)] + +Perhaps the last stand for the bathing dress was the appearance of the +"dressmaker suit" toward the end of the 1920s and on into the early +1930s. The neck and shoulder line copied those of currently fashionable +evening dresses, with a parallel treatment of the skirt, which was +shortened to end just below the hips. This suit was worn by women +reluctant to brave the revealingly unadorned but popular swimming suit. + +A depilatory advertisement took advantage of the increasing +"stockingless vogue" and explained that "Women who love swimming for the +sake of the sport, find stockings a great hindrance to their +enjoyment."[65] By the end of the twenties, the stocking for bathing +and swimming had become an article of the past. + + [65] _Delineator_ (June 1923), vol. 102, no. 6, p. 95. + +Although women were accepted in athletics and had achieved a generally +wider role in public life, white, untanned skin was still the ideal in +the 1920s. Thus sunproof creams, beach coats, and beach umbrellas were +still important. + +According to the well-known "trickle-down" theory of fashion, styles of +dress first become fashionable among the socially elite and wealthy and +are then, in time, emulated by those at lower socio-economic levels. The +knitted swimming suit, however, entered the fashion pages by a different +route. It had its insignificant start with the skirtless bifurcated +garments of the late 1860s. Going against popular opinion, some women +did swim. They violated prevalent standards of modesty by continuing to +wear a functional suit. Gradually the demand grew. A plain, utilitarian +garment was needed; pressure increased. Thus, by the 1920s the swimming +suit prevailed, complimenting the image of the newly emancipated "modern +woman." + + +SWIM SUIT INDUSTRY + +Along with the increased popularity of swimming and the appearance of +the knitted swimming suit we note the rapid development of the +ready-to-wear swim suit industry. During the last half of the 19th +century women frequently made their own bathing dresses with the aid of +paper pattern supplements that appeared in women's magazines of the +period. Dressmakers also may have used these patterns to outfit their +clients for their summer excursions. On the other hand, ladies in the +large cities could purchase bathing dresses at furnishing stores or rent +them at the large public beaches. A small advertisement in _Harper's +Bazar_, August 9, 1873, announced that in addition to gauze undershirts, +linen drawers, collars and cuffs, Union Adams & Co. of New York had +bathing dresses for sale. The notice is noteworthy when one considers +that the ready-to-wear clothing industry and the field of advertising +were in their infancy. + +With the increased popularity of the knitted suit, knitting mills +included men's and women's swimming apparel in their more prosaic lines +of underwear and sweaters. Many companies advertised the new product, +steadily increasing their range until the inevitable occurred. In 1921 a +national advertising campaign for swimming suits was initiated by +Jantzen, a hitherto obscure knitting mill whose production had been +limited to sweaters, woolen hosiery, and jackets for Chinese workmen. +Capitalizing on the growing interest in swimming, Jantzen prominently +advertised swimming suits instead of bathing dresses. The retail stores +selling these suits advertised locally, but national advertising became +the domain of the manufacturers, educating the public to associate +certain positive qualities with their names. + +To the delight of the swim suit industry, swimming was more than a +passing vogue. In 1934, a National Recreation Association study on the +use of leisure time found that among ninety-four free-time activities +swimming was second only to movies in popularity.[66] Although the +number of swimmers was increasing, competition caused the swim suit +industry to take a new approach. Manufacturers attempted to increase the +volume of sales through advertising by emphasizing style. In 1927 one +company advertised a national appeal to woman's vanity by declaring that +beach _uniforms_ were out and that beach _styles_ were in. + + [66] _The Leisure Hours of 5,000 People; a Report of a Study of + Leisure Time Activities and Desires_ (New York, National + Recreation Assoc., 1934). + +It was a general characteristic of the 1930s that swimming suits covered +less of the bather. The attached trunks of the swimming suit no longer +extended down the leg but it survived unseen beneath the vestigial +remains of a skirt. + +The diminishing coverage of the swim suit was also related to a changing +attitude toward sun exposure. For years women had protected their +delicate skin to prevent any unladylike, healthy appearance. The barrier +against a lady having a tan deteriorated as women became accepted into +athletic activities. By 1930, women eagerly sought a sun tan. Not only +were there lotions to help the neophyte sun-worshiper acquire a rich +even tan, but creams were available for the impatient who wished an +instant tan. In line with this trend, swim suit manufacturers and +sellers promoted and sold low sun-back or California styles, halter +necks, and cut-out sections that exposed various portions of the +midriff. The favorite suit, however, was the form-fitting maillot of +wool jersey with no skirt. + +In the early 1930s, the textile trade journals applauded the increasing +stress on styling as a means of encouraging the consumer to buy a new +suit rather than to use "last year's." Stylishness was introduced into +knitted suits through the use of a greater range of solid colors. +Parti-colored suits, with stripes and slashes of a second or even a +third color, were also featured (fig. 18). Knitting mills were pressed +to introduce novelty effects such as mesh, waffle motifs, and lace +patterns in knitted fabrics. + +[Illustration: Figure 18. ONE-PIECE SWIMMING SUITS OF KNITTED WOOL, +1930. (_Courtesy of Cole of California._)] + +The insistent emphasis on novelty encouraged the development of such +items as all-rubber swimming suits with embossed surfaces simulating +knitted textiles. Although this innovation was not successful, because +the suits were clammy and easily torn, rubber did find a definite use in +swimming suits with the introduction of Lastex--a yarn made with a core +of rubber wrapped by a fine thread of another fiber. The following +advertisement for swimming suits made with Lastex best explains why this +important innovation is still valued by the industry today: + + There's no wrinkle, no bag, no sag, even under the most ruthless + sun! No other human device can even approximate that utter + freedom, that perfection of fit, at rest or in motion, that airy + but strictly legal sense of wearing nothing at all. There is no + substitute for this elastic yarn, which imparts lasting + elasticity to any fabric.[67] + + [67] _Harper's Bazaar_ (June 1934), 68th year, no. 2660, p. 9. + +Having exhausted the novelty effects of knitted swim suits, women in the +late 1930s began to respond eagerly to the wide range of decorative +possibilities found in woven fabrics. Cotton and the relatively new +man-made fibers such as Celanese acetate and Dupont rayon were used in +fabrics such as ginghams, chambrays, piques, and featherweight elastic +satins. To the pleasure of the fashion editors, who claimed to be +anxious for some relief from the nudity of the maillot, suits of woven +fabrics were made with flared skirts. These had knitted linings of +cotton, acetate, or wool which satisfied any taste as to warmth or +coolness on the beach. The belief was prevalent that a wool swimming +suit was needed for warmth. In the 1940s the two-piece, bare-midriff +suit with tight shorts or flared skirt was a popular and logical +development from the earlier suits with cut-out sections around the +midriff. The more extreme French bikini, however, was not adopted by +American women when it was first introduced in the 1940s. + +By the end of the forties the one-piece swimming suit staged a comeback +with a slight variation: the new suits were structurally sculptured to +mold, control, and stay put while swimming or sunning. They were the +product of ingenious engineering, inside and out. The use of shirring +and skillful cutting and handling of fabric focused attention on the +bust line, while the frequent use of Lastex tended to streamline the +hips like a girdle. Inside, the careful use of wire and plastic boning +permitted many of these suits to assume a shape of their own and even to +be worn without straps. + +A short-lived revival of the covered-up look appeared in the fashion +pages in 1954 but, unlike the suits with covered arms and neck of the +previous century, these suits drew attention to the parts of the body +that were covered. The fate of this unsuccessful novelty is a good +illustration of the fact that, ultimately, the buyer has the final word +in the volatile field of feminine fashion. The swim suit manufacturers +apparently misinterpreted the American woman's readiness to discard the +more revealing two-piece suit in favor of an altered form of the +maillot. Always ready with novelties to make last year's suit obsolete, +the manufacturers tried to encourage women into a more extreme +covered-up look. Despite the power of national advertising women were +unwilling to go back in time. The female beach-goer and sun-worshiper +opposed a suit that might interfere with the tanning process. + +By 1960, the production of swim suits had become a big business with +mass distribution and mass markets. Expanded world-wide transportation +facilities and increased leisure and affluence in the United States +created a demand for midwinter vacation clothing for use in warmer +climates, and the manufacturing of swim suits became a year-round +undertaking, producing 14,728 million knitted and woven suits in +women's, misses, and junior sizes in 1960.[68] + + [68] Compiled from "Production of Selected Items of Knit Outerwear and + Swimwear; 1960-1961," _Apparel Survey 1961_ (1962), series + M23A(61)-2, p. 14. + + + + +Conclusions + + +The earliest bathing dress for women in the United States may have been +an old smock or shift, followed by a bathing gown based on the shift or +chemise. Although women's bathing and swimming costume achieved an +identity of its own during the 19th century, the evolution of this garb +followed certain innovations in women's underclothing, namely, drawers +in the first half of the 19th century, the "combination" of the late +1870s, and the brassiere and panties of the 1930s. The greatest number +of minor style changes, however, were direct reflections of fashions in +street dress. The rising hemline and, at times, the discarding of a +skirt during periods when women wore long dresses for other activities +can be attributed to changes caused by the functional requirements of +bathing and swimming; the shortening of sleeves and trousers in the last +quarter of the 19th century were also functional improvements. The +benefits of the shorter trousers, however, were minimized when modesty +required women to cover their exposed legs with stockings. + +Swimming suits have been considered a 20th century innovation; in fact +one corporation is under the impression that a member of their staff was +responsible for the first use of the term "swimming suit" early in the +century. The findings presented in this paper show that some women were +wearing "swimming suits" that were distinctly different from bathing +dresses as early as the 1870s and that both co-existed for some 50 +years. Bathing dresses disappeared in the 1920s with the widespread +acceptance of its functional counterpart; "bathing suit" no longer +referred to a special type of costume but became interchangeable with +the term "swimming suit." + +The insistent trend toward more functional costume reached its ultimate +conclusion with the refinements of the knitted swimming suit in the +1930s. Subsequent changes have not improved upon the functional design +of this classic suit. In many instances these variations have been +merely to satisfy the feminine desire for distinctive apparel and the +industry's need for perishable fashions. Female competitive swimmers +have continued to wear the simple knitted suit--now of nylon rather than +wool. + +The changes since the 1930s have shown a trend toward diminution in the +coverage of the swimming suit. One cannot be certain what this means for +the future, but it is unlikely that either the swim suit industry or +standards of modesty of the near future will permit a total elimination +of swimming costume. We can be assured, however, that so long as women +swim, they will not repeat history by swathing themselves with yards of +fabric. + + +U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1969 + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume +in the United States, by Claudia B. Kidwell + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING *** + +***** This file should be named 37586-8.txt or 37586-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/5/8/37586/ + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Harry Lamé and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/37586-8.zip b/37586-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c105c0e --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-8.zip diff --git a/37586-h.zip b/37586-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b380cc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h.zip diff --git a/37586-h/37586-h.htm b/37586-h/37586-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5ae0f5e --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/37586-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,3241 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Women’s Bathing and Swimming Costume in the United States, by Claudia B. Kidwell. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + + .blockquot {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;} + body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;} + .caption {font-size: .8em; text-align: center; margin: auto 1em;} + .center {text-align: center;} + .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center;} + .fnanchor {vertical-align: top; font-size: .7em; text-decoration: none;} + .footnote {margin-left: 8%; margin-right: 8%; font-size: .8em;} + .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 86%; text-align: right; font-size: .8em;} + .fsize80 {font-size: .8em;} + .fsize150 {font-size: 1.5em;} + h1,h2 {text-align: center; clear: both;} + h3 {text-align: left; clear: right; font-size: 1em;} + hr {width: 33%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; clear: both;} + hr.c25 {width: 25%;} + .left {text-align: left;} + .lettsymb {font-family: "Arial","Sans-serif";} + .nowrap {white-space: nowrap;} + p {margin-top: .75em; text-align: justify; margin-bottom: .75em;} + .pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; font-size: smaller; text-align: right; color: gray;} + .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;} + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; text-indent: -2em;} + .right {text-align: right;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + sub {font-size: .6em; vertical-align: -20%;} + sup {font-size: .6em; vertical-align: 25%;} + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 1em; border-collapse: collapse;} + td.padr3 {padding-right: 1.5em;} + .tnbox {border: solid 2px; background: #999966; margin: 1em 20%; padding: 1em;} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the +United States, by Claudia B. Kidwell + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the United States + +Author: Claudia B. Kidwell + +Release Date: October 1, 2011 [EBook #37586] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING *** + + + + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Harry Lamé and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + + +<div class="tnbox"> +<p class="center">Please see <a href="#TN">Transcriber's Notes</a> at the end of this document.</p> +</div> + +<hr class="c25" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/coverf.jpg" alt="Front Cover" width="400" height="513" /></div> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<div style="margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;"> +<p class="right" style="line-height: 1.5em;"><span class="smcap">United States National Museum Bulletin 250<br /> +Contributions from<br /> +The Museum of History and Technology<br /> +Paper 64</span></p> + +<p class="right fsize150" style="margin-top: 2em;">WOMEN’S BATHING AND SWIMMING COSTUME +IN THE UNITED STATES</p> + +<p class="right" style="margin-bottom: 2em;"><i>Claudia B. Kidwell</i></p> + +<table class="right" style="margin-right: 0;" summary="ToC"> + +<tr> +<td class="right padr3">INTRODUCTION</td> +<td class="right"><a href="#Page_3">3</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right padr3">CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT</td> +<td class="right"><a href="#Page_6">6</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right padr3">BATHING COSTUME</td> +<td class="right"><a href="#Page_14">14</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right padr3">SWIMMING COSTUME</td> +<td class="right"><a href="#Page_24">24</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right padr3">CONCLUSIONS</td> +<td class="right"><a href="#Page_32">32</a></td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p class="right" style="line-height: 1em; margin-top: 1.5em;"><span class="smcap">Smithsonian Institution Press<br /> +City of Washington</span><br /> +1968</p> + +<p class="left fsize80">For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office<br /> +Washington, D.C. 20402—Price 50 cents (paper cover)</p> + +</div> + +<hr class="c25" /> + +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[2]</a></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"><a name="Fig1" id="Fig1"></a> +<img src="images/illo01.jpg" alt="Bathing costumes c. 1884" width="400" height="505" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 1.—<span class="smcap">Bathing costume</span>, from <i>The Delineator</i>, July 1884. +(Smithsonian photo 58466.)</p></div> + +<hr class="c25" /> + +<p class="right"><i>Claudia B. Kidwell</i></p> + +<h1><i>Women’s Bathing and Swimming Costume +in the United States</i></h1> + +<div class="blockquot"><p><i>The evolution of the modern swim suit from an unflattering, +restrictive bathing dress into an attractive, functional costume is +traced from colonial times to the present. This evolution in style +reflects not only the increasing involvement of women in aquatic +activities but also the changing motivations for feminine participation. +The nature of the style changes in aquatic dress +were influenced by the fashions of the period, while functional +improvements were limited by prevailing standards of modesty. +This mutation of the bathing dress to the swim suit demonstrates +the changing attitudes and status of women in the United States, +from the traditional image of the subordinate “weaker sex” to +an equal and active member of the society.</i></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">The Author</span>: <i>Claudia B. Kidwell is assistant curator +of American costume, department of civil history, in the Smithsonian +Institution’s Museum of History and Technology.</i></p></div> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></p> +<h2>Introduction</h2> + +<p>Women’s bathing dress holds a unique place in +the history of American costume. This specialized +garb predates the age of sports costume which +arrived during the last half of the 19th century. +Although bathing dress shares this distinction with +riding costume, the aquatic garb was merely utilitarian +in the late 18th century while riding costume had +a fashionable role. From its modest status, bathing +gowns and later bathing dresses became more important +until their successor, the swimming suit, +achieved a permanent place among the outfits worn +by 20th century women. The social significance of +this accomplishment was best expressed by Foster +Rhea Dulles, author of <i>America Learns to Play</i>, in 1940, +when he wrote:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The modern bathing-suit ... symbolized the new status +of women even more than the short skirts and bobbed +hair of the jazz age or the athleticism of the devotees of +tennis and golf. It was the final proof of their successful<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span> +assertion of the right to enjoy whatever recreation they +chose, costumed according to the demands of the sport +rather than the tabus of an outworn prudery, and to +enjoy it in free and natural association with men.<a name="FNanchor_1" +id="FNanchor_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p></div> + +<p>Since the prescribed limitations of women’s role in +any given period are determined and affected by +many social factors, the evolution of the bathing +gown to the swimming suit may not only be dependent +upon the changes in the American woman’s way of +life, but also may reflect certain technological and +sociological factors that are not readily identifiable. +The purpose of this paper is to describe the changes +in women’s bathing dress and wherever pertinent +to present the factors affecting these styles.<a name="FNanchor_2" +id="FNanchor_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a></p> + +<p>Anyone who attempts to research the topic of swimming +and related subjects will be confronted with a +history of varying reactions. Ralph Thomas, in 1904, +described his experiences through the years that he +spent compiling a book on swimming:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>When asked what I was doing, I have felt the greatest +reluctance to say a work on the literature of swimming. +People who were writing novels or some other thing of +little practical utility always looked at me with a smile of +pity on my mentioning swimming. Though I am bound +to say that, when I gave them some idea of the work, the +pity changed somewhat but then they would say “Why +don’t you give us a new edition of your Handbook of +Fictitious Names?” As if the knowledge of the real name +of an author was of any importance in comparison with +the discussion of a subject that more or less concerns every +human being.<a name="FNanchor_3" id="FNanchor_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a></p></div> + +<p>Such reactions toward research about swimming +probably discouraged many serious efforts of writing +about the subject. Its scant coverage and even omission +in histories of recreation or sports may be explained +by the fact that swimming cannot be categorized +as simply physical exercise, skill, recreation, or +competitive sport. In trying to determine the extent to +which women swam in times past it is frustrating to +observe the historians’ masculine bias in researching +and reporting social history.</p> + +<p>A study of women’s bathing dress meets with similar +problems, and while a discussion of bathing dress can +evoke considerable interest, its nature is usually considered +more superficial than serious. Descriptions of, +and even brief references to, bathing apparel for women +are very scarce before the third quarter of the +19th century. Before this time only decorative costume +items were considered worthy of description and bathing +costume was not in this category. It is only within +comparatively recent times that costume historians +have conceded sufficient importance to bathing dress +to include meaningful descriptions in their research.</p> + +<p>Participation in water activities was widespread in +the ancient world although the earliest origins of this +activity are unknown. For example, in Greece and, +later, in Rome, swimming was valued as a pleasurable +exercise and superb physical training for warriors. +The more sedentary citizens turned to the baths which +became the gathering point for professional men, +philosophers, and students. Thus bathing and swimming, +combined originally to fulfill the functions of +cleansing and exercise purely for physical well being, +developed the secondary functions of recreation and +social intercourse.</p> + +<p>With the rise of the Christian church and its +spreading anti-pagan attitudes, many of the sumptuous +baths were destroyed. Christian asceticism also +may have contributed to the decline of bathing for +cleansing. In addition there was a secular belief that +outdoor bathing helped to spread the fearful epidemics +that periodically swept the continent. Although +there is isolated evidence that swimming was valued +as a physical skill,<a name="FNanchor_4" id="FNanchor_4"></a><a +href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> swimming and bathing all but +disappeared during the Middle Ages.</p> + +<p>In 1531, long after the Middle Ages, Sir Thomas +Elyot wrote of swimming that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>There is an exercise, whyche is right profitable in extreme +danger of warres, but ... it hathe not ben of longe tyme +muche used, specially amoge noble men, perchaunce some +reders whl lyttell esteeme it.<a name="FNanchor_5" id="FNanchor_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a></p></div> + +<p>This early English writer gave no instructions, but expounded +on the value of swimming as a skill that +could be useful in time of war.</p> + +<p>It herewith becomes necessary to differentiate +between bathing and swimming with their attendant<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span> +goals, for it was the goals of each activity which influenced +the associated customs and costume designs. +For this discussion we shall define bathing as the act +of immersing all or part of the body in water for +cleansing, therapeutic, recreational, or religious +purposes, and swimming as the self-propulsion of the +body through water. When we refer to swimming it is +necessary to distinguish whether it was considered +a useful skill, a therapeutic exercise, a recreation, or a +competitive sport. Thus it is important to note that +while bathing for all purposes and swimming as a +physical exercise, recreation, and sport died out +during the Middle Ages, the latter continued to be +valued as a skill, particularly for warriors. This +function of swimming survived to form the link +between the ancients and the 17th century.</p> + +<p>According to Ralph Thomas, the first book on +swimming was written by Nicolas Winmann, a professor +of languages at Ingolstadt in Bavaria, and +printed in 1528. The first book published in England +on swimming was written in Latin by Everard Digby +and printed in 1587. As Thomas has stated, Digby’s +book</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>... is entitled to a far more important place than the +first of the world, because, whereas Winmann had never +(up to 1866) been translated or copied or even quoted by +any one, Digby has been three times translated; twice +into English and once into French and through this latter +became and probably still is the best known treatise on +the subject.<a name="FNanchor_6" id="FNanchor_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a></p></div> + +<p>This French version was first published in 1696 with +its purported author being Monsieur Melchisédesh +Thévenot. In his introduction Thévenot indicates +that he has made use of Digby’s book in his own +treatise and that he knows of Winmann’s publication. +The English translation of Thévenot’s version became +the standard instruction book for English-speaking +peoples. Typically, his reasons in favor of men swimming +were based on its being a useful skill (i.e., to +keep from being drowned in a shipwreck, to escape +capture when being pursued by enemies, and to attack +an enemy posted on the opposite side of a river).<a name="FNanchor_7" +id="FNanchor_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a></p> + +<p>In the 18th and 19th centuries numerous other +publications on swimming appeared—too numerous +to deal with in this paper. Nevertheless, the refinement +of the art of swimming was not related to the number +of instruction books. Few of these books actually +offered new insights in comparison with those that +were outright plagiarisms or filled with misinformation. +In the meantime, bathing was reintroduced and +as this activity became more widespread swimming +was regarded as more than a useful skill, but only for +men.</p> + +<p>There is little evidence of women bathing or swimming +prior to the 17th century; these activities seem +to have been exclusively for men. Nevertheless, +Thomas refers to Winmann as writing, in 1538, that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>at Zurich in his day (thus implying that he was an elderly +man and that the custom had ceased) the young men and +maidens bathed together around the statue of “Saint +Nicolai.” Even in those days his pupil asks “were not the +girls ashamed of being naked?” “No, as they wore +bathing drawers—sometimes a marriage was brought +about.” If any young man failed to bring up stones from +the bottom, when he dived, he had to suffer the penalty +of wearing drawers like the girls.<a name="FNanchor_8" id="FNanchor_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a></p></div> + +<p>Thomas goes on to say that the only evidence he had +found of women swimming in England in early days +was in a ballad entitled “The Swimming Lady” and +dating from about 1670. Despite these isolated references +it was not until the 19th century that women +were encouraged to swim.</p> + +<p>After its decline in the Middle Ages, bathing +achieved new popularity as a medicinal treatment +for both men and women. In England this revival +occurred in the 17th century when certain medical +men held that bathing in fresh water had healing +properties. The resultant spas, which were developed +at freshwater springs to effect such “cures,” expanded +rapidly as the number of their devotees increased. +By the mid-18th century, rival practitioners claimed +even greater health-giving properties for sea water +both as a drink and for bathing. An economic benefit +resulted when, tiny, poverty-stricken fishing hamlets +became famous through the patronage of the wealthy +in search of health as well as pleasure.</p> + +<p>When the early colonists left England in the first +half of the 17th century, the beliefs and practices they +had acquired in their original homes were brought to +the new world. Thus, it is important to note that +during this period in Europe, swimming was a skill +practiced by few, primarily soldiers and sailors. It +was not until the second half of the century that +bathing for therapeutic purposes was becoming +popular in the old world.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span>The earliest reference to women’s bathing costume +has been quoted previously in Winmann’s amazing +description of mixed bathing at Zurich. He referred +to women, wearing only drawers, bathing with men +as a custom no longer practiced when he wrote his +book in 1538.</p> + +<p>One of the earliest illustrations of bathing costume +I have located is part of a painted fan leaf, about +1675, that was reproduced in volume 9 of Maurice +Leloir’s <i>Histoire du Costume de l’Antiquité</i> in 1914. In +one corner of this painting, which depicts a variety +of activities going on in the Seine and on the river +banks at Paris, women are shown immersing themselves +in water within a covered wooden frame. They +are wearing loose, light-colored gowns and long +headdresses. An English source of the late 17th century +described a very similar costume.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The ladye goes into the bath with garments made of +yellow canvas, which is stiff and made large with great +sleeves like a parson’s gown. The water fills it up so that +it’s borne off that your shape is not seen, it does not cling +close as other lining.<a name="FNanchor_9" id="FNanchor_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p></div> + +<p>In the course of my contacts with other costume +historians I have encountered the belief that women +did not wear any bathing costume before the mid-19th +century. Supporting this theory I have seen a reproduction +of a print, about 1812, showing women +bathing nude in the ocean at Margate, England, but +the evidence already presented indicates clearly that +costume was worn earlier. Also certain English secondary +sources refer to a nondescript chemise-type of +bathing dress that was worn during the first quarter +of the 19th century. Because little study has been given +European bathing costume, it is not possible to conjecture +under what circumstances costume was or was +not used. We do know, however, that when bathing +became popular in the new world bathing gowns +were worn by some women in the old.</p> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<h2>Cultural Environment</h2> + +<p>As many European cultural traits were transmitted +to the new world via England, so was the +introduction of water activities. Nevertheless it +required a number of years for such cultural refinements +as bathing to take root in the new environment. +The early colonists brought with them a limited +knowledge of swimming, but they did not have the +leisure to cultivate this skill. In New England the +Puritan religious and social beliefs were as restrictive +as the lack of leisure time. In this harsh climate, +self-indulgence in swimming and bathing did not +fulfill the requirements of being righteous and useful. +Thus the growing popularity of bathing among the +wealthy in Europe during the 17th and early 18th +centuries had little initial impact in the new world.</p> + +<p>Although swimming as a skill predated the introduction +of bathing to the new world, I will first +discuss bathing since the customs and facilities established +for it reveal the development of swimming +in America, first for men and then for women.</p> + +<h3>BATHING</h3> + +<p>One of the earliest sources showing an appreciation +of mineral waters for bathing in the new world is +a 1748 reference in George Washington’s diary to +the “fam’d Warm Springs.”<a name="FNanchor_10" id="FNanchor_10"></a><a +href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> At that time only +open ground surrounded the springs which were +located within a dense forest.</p> + +<p>Another entry for July 31, 1769, records his departure +with Mrs. Washington for these springs (now +known as Berkeley Springs, West Virginia) where +they stayed more than a month. They were accompanied +by her daughter, Patsy Custis, who was +probably taken in hope of curing a form of epilepsy +with which she was afflicted. In the latter part of the +18th century hundreds of visitors annually flocked +to these springs. Although the accommodations were +primitive, we early note that the avowed therapeutic +aims for visiting these waters were very quickly +combined with a growing social life on dry land.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Rude log huts, board and canvas tents, and even covered +wagons, served as lodging rooms, while every party +brought its own substantial provisions of flour, meat and +bacon, depending for lighter articles of diet on the “Hill +folk,” or the success of their own foragers. A large hollow +scooped in the sand, surrounded by a screen of pine brush, +was the only bathing-house; and this was used alternately +by ladies and gentlemen. The time set apart for the ladies +was announced by a blast on a long tin horn, at which +signal all of the opposite sex retired to a prescribed +distance, ... Here day and night passed in a round of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span> +eating and drinking, bathing, fiddling, dancing, and +reveling. Gaming was carried to a great excess and +horse-racing was a daily amusement.<a name="FNanchor_11" id="FNanchor_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p></div> + +<p>The more permanent bath houses found at the +increasing number of springs in the early 19th +century were really only shanties built where the +water bubbled up. Nevertheless, as civilization moved +in upon these resorts, the current taboos and mores +were soon imposed. These gave rise to customs, +facilities, and inventions peculiar to the pastime. +The more permanent facilities carefully separated +men from women. Frequently the women’s bath +was located a considerable distance from the men’s +and surrounded by a high fence. Female attendants +were at hand to wait upon the ladies, and private +rooms were prepared for their use both before and +after bathing.</p> + +<p>In the early 19th century the fame of Berkeley +Springs was eclipsed temporarily by the growing +popularity of other springs, such as Saratoga in the +north and White Sulphur Springs in the south. The +newest facilities, however, and the completion of +the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, restored Berkeley +to its former prosperity in the early 1850s.</p> + +<p>The bath houses at Berkeley Springs in the 1850s +are an example of the facilities that were considered +convenient, extensive, and elegant during this period. +The gentlemen’s bath house contained fourteen +dressing rooms and ten large bathing rooms. In +addition to the plunge baths, which were twelve +feet long, five feet wide, and four and a half feet deep, +the men had a swimming bath that was sixty feet +long, twenty feet wide, and five feet deep. The +ladies’ and men’s bath houses were located on +opposite sides of the grove. As if this were not reassuring +enough, we are told that the building for +the weaker sex was surrounded by several acres of +trees. Thus protected, feminine bathers could choose +either one of the nine private baths or the plunge +bath, which was thirty feet long by sixteen feet +wide and four and a half feet deep, as well as use +a shower or artificial warm baths.<a name="FNanchor_12" id="FNanchor_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p> + +<p>The differences between the two bath houses show +that women were not as active in the water as the +men. Judging from the kind of facilities that were +provided at Berkeley Springs, the ladies did less +“plunging” than the men and no swimming.</p> + +<p>Although accepted in England, bathing in <b>salt</b> +water did not become popular in the new world +until some time after bathing at springs was established.</p> + +<p>In 1794 a Mr. Bailey announced that he planned +to institute “bathing machines and several species of +entertainment” at his resort on Long Island.<a name="FNanchor_13" id="FNanchor_13"></a><a +href="#Footnote_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> “A +machine of peculiar construction for bathing in the +open sea” was advertised a few years later by a hotel +proprietor at Nahant, Massachusetts.<a name="FNanchor_14" id="FNanchor_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14" +class="fnanchor">[14]</a> There is some +question as to what the term “bathing machine” +describes. Existing records show that W. Merritt of +New York City received a patent dated February 1, +1814, for a “bathing machine.” Unfortunately neither +a description nor a drawing can be found today. +European patents from the first half of the 19th +century reveal that a bathing machine could be a +contraption in which an individual bathed in privacy. +This is what the above quotations seem to be describing. +In general usage, however, “bathing machine” +could also have been a device in which an individual +removed his clothing to prepare for bathing; this +type will be described later.</p> + +<p>By the early 19th century floating baths were +established in every city of any importance including +Boston, Salem, Hartford, New York, Philadelphia, +Washington, Richmond, Charleston, and Savannah. +One bath located at the foot of Jay Street in New +York City was described as follows:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The building is an octagon of seventy feet in diameter, +with a plank floor supported by logs so as to sink the +center bath four feet below the surface of the water, but +in the private baths the water may be reduced to three or +even two feet so as to be perfectly safe for children. It is +placed in the current so always to be supplied with ocean +and pure water and rises and falls with the tide.<a name="FNanchor_15" id="FNanchor_15"></a><a +href="#Footnote_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a></p></div> + +<p>As was true at the springs, men and women were +segregated; but in the floating baths they were only +separated by being in different compartments rather +than in different bath houses.</p> + +<p>Although there were a number of these baths there +were not enough to cover all of the inviting river banks +and sea shores. There are many instances of men enjoying<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span> +the water of undeveloped shores and there is +some evidence of women venturing into the bays and +rivers (<a href="#Fig2">fig. 2</a>).</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"><a name="Fig2" id="Fig2"></a> +<img src="images/illo14.jpg" alt="Painting of Bathing Party, 1810" width="500" height="326" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 2.—“<span class="smcap">Bathing Party</span>, 1810,” painting by William P. Chappel.<br /> +(<i>Courtesy of Museum of the City of New York.</i>)</p></div> + +<p>Nevertheless, few women ventured into the open +ocean during the early 19th century. They were +generally afraid to brave the force of the ocean waves +with only a female companion, since prevailing +attitudes regarding the proper behavior of a lady +prevented them from being accompanied by a man. +When a few ignored this dictate, their bold actions +gave rise to “ill-founded stories of want of delicacy on +the part of the females.”<a name="FNanchor_16" id="FNanchor_16"></a><a +href="#Footnote_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> An unbiased traveler, +who gave an account of this mixed bathing in 1833, +stated that parties always went into the water completely +dressed and for that reason he could see no +great violation of modesty. Mixed bathing at the +seashore (<a href="#Fig3">fig. 3</a>) was gaining acceptance, however, +when it was reported only thirteen years later that +“... ladies and gentlemen bathe in company, as is +the fashion all along the Atlantic Coast....”<a name="FNanchor_17" +id="FNanchor_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"><a name="Fig3" id="Fig3"></a> +<img src="images/illo18.png" alt="Bathing at Cape May, 1849" width="450" height="526" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 3.—“<span class="smcap">Scene at Cape May</span>,” <i>Godey’s Lady’s +Book</i>, August 1849. (<i>Courtesy of The New York Public +Library.</i>)</p></div> + +<p>In place of the dressing rooms available in the floating +baths, special facilities were frequently provided. +The bathing machine—in this case a device in which +one changed clothes—was used where there was a +gentle slope down to the water. This species of bathing +machine was a small wooden cabin set on very +high wheels with steps leading down from a door in +the front. The bather entered and, while he was +changing, the machine was pulled into the sea by a +horse. When water was well above the axles the horse +was uncoupled and taken ashore. The bather was +then free to enter the sea by descending the steps<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span> +pointed away from the shore (<a href="#Fig4">fig. 4</a>). Machines of the +18th and early 19th century were frequently equipped +with an awning which shielded the bather from +public view as she or he descended the steps to enter +the water. These awnings were left off the bathing +machines during the last half of the 19th century. +Such machines were used to a great extent in Europe +during the 18th and 19th centuries. In the United +States, however, they were used only to a limited +extent during the first half of the 19th century. By 1870 +they had practically disappeared—being replaced by +the stationary, sentry-box type of individual structure +and the large communal bath house.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"><a name="Fig4" id="Fig4"></a> +<img src="images/illo19.png" alt="Bathing at Newport, 1858" width="500" height="339" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 4.—“<span class="smcap">The Bathe at Newport</span>,” by +Winslow Homer, <i>Harper’s Weekly Newspaper</i>, September 1858.<br /> +(Smithsonian photo 59665.)</p></div> + +<p>“Sentry-boxes” were used before the 1870s at +beaches where the terrain did not encourage the use +of the bathing machines. At Long Branch, New +Jersey, and at one of the beaches at Newport, Rhode +Island, lines of these stationary structures were available +to the bather for changing, one half designated +for women and the other half for men. Hours varied +but it was the practice to run up colored flags to +signal bathing times for the ladies and then the gentlemen. +A male correspondent wrote from Newport +in 1857:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>If you are social and wish to bathe promiscuously, you +put on a dress and go in with the ladies, if you want to +cultivate the “fine and froggy art of swimming,” unencumbered +by attire, you wait until the twelve o’clock +red-flag is run up—when the ladies retire.<a name="FNanchor_18" +id="FNanchor_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a></p></div> + +<p>From its early beginnings, in the late 18th and +early 19th century, the summer excursion to the resorts +and spas grew in popularity. In 1848, a writer of a +Philadelphia fashion report explained that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Very few ladies of fashion are now in town, most of them +being birds of passage during the last of July and all of +August. Most Americans seem to have adopted the +fashion of visiting watering-places through the summer.<a name="FNanchor_19" +id="FNanchor_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a></p></div> + +<p>As the summer excursion became a social event, +the recreational possibilities of bathing overshadowed +its earlier therapeutic function. Bathing became +part of an increasingly elaborate schedule of activities +where each event—bathing, dining, concerts, balls, +promenades, carriage rides—had its appointed time, +place, and proper costume.</p> + +<p>In addition to stiff ocean breezes, seaside resorts +had an extra appeal that beguiled visitors away +from the spas—namely mixed bathing. For during +the bathing hour at the seashore all the stiffness +and etiquette of select society was abandoned to +pleasure.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Again and again I try it. Deliriusm! I forget even Miss +<span class="nowrap">——,</span> and dive headforemost into the billows. I rush +to meet them. I jump on their backs. I ride on their +combs, or I let them roll over me.... I am in the +thickest of the bathers, and amid the roar of waves, am +driven wild with excitement by the shouts of laughter; +burst of noisy merriment, and little jolly female shrieks of +fun. All are wild with excitement, ducking, diving, +splashing, floating, rollicking.<a name="FNanchor_20" id="FNanchor_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a></p></div> + +<p>Thus bathing was transformed from a medicinal +treatment to a pleasurable pursuit.</p> + +<p>Excursionists had to be hardy individuals, firm +in their resolve to complete their trip. Although<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span> +many railroad lines had been completed by the +1850s, transportation problems were by no means +solved. For example, a New York tourist who planned +to enjoy a summer at Lake George had to travel by +boat from New York City to Albany and Troy, +then by railroad to Morean Corner, and, finally, +by stage to the lake. After listing the difficulties +endured by excursionists, a particularly embittered +correspondent commented in 1856, “... we envy +these happy people in nothing but the power to +be idle.”<a name="FNanchor_21" id="FNanchor_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p> + +<p>By the 1870s, travel facilities were rapidly being +improved and many new summer resorts were +established which appealed to a larger segment of +the population.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Comparatively few can stay long at one time at the springs +or seaside resorts, and hence the peculiar value of arrangements +like those for enabling multitudes to take frequent +short pleasant excursions down the New York Bay and +along the Atlantic coast, as well as up the Hudson, and +through Long Island Sound.<a name="FNanchor_22" id="FNanchor_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p></div> + +<p>Beaches that catered to a large cross-section of the +population provided a wide variety of informal +activities that replaced the established functions +found at the more select bathing resorts. For example, +the illustration of Coney Island in 1878 (<a href="#Fig5">fig. 5</a>) +shows a puppet show; pony rides for children; a +hurdy gurdy; vendors of walking sticks, sunglasses,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span> +and food; and guide ropes in the water for timid +bathers.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"><a name="Fig5" id="Fig5"></a> +<img src="images/illo22.png" alt="Beach Fun on Coney Island" width="500" height="335" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 5.—“<span class="smcap">Scenes and Incidents on Coney Island</span>,” +<i>Harper’s Weekly Newspaper</i>, August 1878.<br /> +(Smithsonian photo 59666.)</p></div> + +<p>In the 1890s foreign visitors were impressed by +American concern with finding opportunities to play; +early in the century they had remarked on the apparent +lack of interest in amusements. The term, “summer +resorts,” no longer referred to a relatively small +number of fashionable watering places. The <i>New +York Tribune</i> was running eight columns of summer +hotel advertisements aimed directly at the middle +class. The popular <i>Summer Tourist and Excursion Guide</i> +listed moderate-priced hotels and railroad excursions; +it was a far departure from the fashionable tour of the +1840s.</p> + +<p>Thus, as economic and technological factors +changed, bathing was transformed from a medicinal +treatment for the leisure class to a recreation enjoyed +by a large portion of the population.</p> + +<h3>SWIMMING</h3> + +<p>As has been stated earlier, swimming was being +practiced by men in Europe when the early colonists +were leaving their old homes. Nevertheless, the task +of establishing new homes left them little time to +practice the “art of swimming” or to teach it to +fellow colonists.</p> + +<p>Benjamin Franklin is no doubt the most famous +early proponent of swimming in the colonies. In his +autobiography written in the form of a letter to his +son in 1771, Franklin revealed his early interest in +swimming.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>I had from a child been delighted with this exercise, had +studied and practiced Thévenot’s motions and position, +and added some of my own, aiming at the graceful and +easy, as well as the useful.<a name="FNanchor_23" id="FNanchor_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a></p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span>Benjamin Franklin used every opportunity to +encourage his friends to learn to swim,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>as I wish all men were taught to do in their youth; they +would, on many occurrences, be the safer for having that +skill, and on many more the happier, as freer from painful +apprehensions of danger, to say nothing of the enjoyment +in so delightful and wholesome an exercise.<a name="FNanchor_24" id="FNanchor_24"></a><a +href="#Footnote_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a></p></div> + +<p>Not only was Franklin in favor of being able to swim +but when requested he advised friends on methods +for how to teach oneself. His instructions, in his letter +of September 28, 1776 to Mr. Oliver Neale, were +published a number of times even as late as the 1830s.</p> + +<p>America’s first swimming school was established at +Boston in 1827 by Francis Liefer. Two expert swimmers, +John Quincy Adams and John James Audubon, +the ornithologist, visited the school and each expressed +delight at having found such an establishment.</p> + +<p>Numerous books instructing men how to swim were +brought into the United States in the early 19th +century and some were republished here, but the +first original work (i.e., not a plagiarism) by an +American was not published until 1846. In this book +the author, James Arlington Bennet, M.D., LL.D., +based his instructions upon his own personal observations +as an experienced swimmer. Dr. Bennet’s +publication requires special note not only due to the +basic value of the information but because of the +extraordinary title (i.e., <i>The Art of Swimming Exemplified +by Diagrams from Which Both Sexes May Learn +to Swim and Float on the Water; and Rules for All Kinds +of Bathing in the Preservation of Health and Cure of +Disease, with the Management of Diet from Infancy to Old +Age, and a Valuable Remedy Against Sea-sickness</i>). Thanks +to this explicit title we learn that Dr. Bennet was in +favor of women learning to swim. This energetic +aquatic activity had long been considered a masculine +skill and, despite such a significant publication, this +attitude continued until much later in the century.</p> + +<p>We have already noted in a previous discussion that +the Berkeley Springs bath houses of the 1850s provided +a swimming bath for men but no similar +facilities for women. Also at certain seaside resorts +of the same period, a special time was set for men to +practice the art of swimming without clothing, but +women had no similar opportunity. When the ladies +entered the water they were clothed from head to toe +because men were also present. The description of +women’s bathing costume, which will appear in a +later section, clearly shows that women could do +little more than try to maintain their footing. Undoubtedly +some “brazen” women did find the opportunity +to swim, but the general attitude was that +women should only immerse themselves in water.</p> + +<p>By the 1860s there was a widespread health +movement which gave additional momentum to the +belief that physical exercise was good for one’s +well-being. As a result, women were being encouraged +to emerge from their state of physical inactivity +imposed by social custom. Swimming had already +gained recognition as a healthful exercise for men, +but with this fresh approach it was even being +suggested that women should swim. A column that +appeared in 1866, entitled “Physical Exercise for +Females,” asserted that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Bathing, as it is practiced at our coast resorts, is, no doubt, +a delightful recreation; but if to it swimming could be +added, the delight would be increased, and the possible +use and advantage much extended.<a name="FNanchor_25" id="FNanchor_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a></p></div> + +<p>In answer to the possible objection that the facilities +for teaching were not always available, the writer +maintained that in addition to the seashore there +were rivers, lakes, and ponds as well as the swimming +baths found in most large cities. He further asserted +that if the demand were great enough, certain days +could be appropriated exclusively to women as +was done in some of the London baths.</p> + +<p>The type of baths referred to in this case were not +built simply to supply a health-giving treatment or +for recreation as described earlier. As part of the +health movement mentioned above, there was a +growing concern in regards to personal cleansing; +it was realized that merely splashing water on the +face in the morning was not sufficient for good personal +hygiene. While facilities for washing the whole body +were being installed in wealthy homes, there was also +a growing concern for the masses of people who +could not afford such extravagance. Thus philanthropic +individuals encouraged the building of +public swimming baths in densely populated, low +income areas. It was hoped that, although the patrons +would be covered by bathing costume and would be +seeking refreshment and recreation, this unaccustomed +contact with water would improve their personal +hygiene.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span>In 1870 a reporter for <i>Leslie’s</i>, who was describing +two elegant large bathhouses (the type described +above) in New York City, stated that Mondays, +Wednesdays, and Fridays were set apart for ladies +and Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays for gentlemen. +These baths became quite popular in the large +cities, particularly among people who could not +afford the time or money to make trips even to the +near seaside resorts. By the 1880s they were so popular +that bathing time was scheduled to allow many sets +of bathers to enjoy the water. Thus a number of +women who had probably never been completely +covered with water before had the opportunity to +learn to swim.</p> + +<p>While women were being encouraged to practice +swimming as a healthful exercise, this activity was +being recognized as a recreation and sport for men. +The increasing affluence during the last three decades +of the 19th century, which made possible the widespread +popularity of summer excursions, encouraged +swimming as an individual pastime as well as a +growing spectator sport. This was true not only for +swimming but for nearly every sport we enjoy today. +In 1871 a reporter wrote:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>It is not underrating the interest attached to yachting or +rowing matches, to say that swimming clubs and swimming +matches can be made to create wider and more +useful emulation among “the Million” who can never +participate in or benefit by those notable trials of skill +and muscle.<a name="FNanchor_26" id="FNanchor_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a></p></div> + +<p>By the 1890s this growing interest in spectator and +individual sports evidenced several interesting results. +Separate sporting pages were established in the formats +of many newspapers. In addition to being a summer +pastime, “the art of swimming” became an intercollegiate +and Olympic sport, and was included on +the roster of events for the 1896 revival of the Olympic +Games held in Athens. Innovations in facilities and +techniques helped to alter the character of swimming. +The most notable of these were the development of +the indoor pool and the introductions of the crawl +stroke into the United States.</p> + +<p>It was in this time period that swimming for women +was becoming socially acceptable. In 1888, Goucher +College, a prominent girls’ school, built its own indoor +pool and the following year swimming was listed in +its catalog for the first time. Writers, in turn, no longer +felt it necessary to convince readers that women should +be more active in the water, but concentrated instead +on what a woman should know when she swims. This +changing attitude gained world-wide recognition in +1912 at Stockholm when the 100-meter swimming +event for women was included in the schedule.</p> + +<p>The period of prosperity following World War I +brought a marked increase in the appreciation of +recreation, resulting in an increase of swimming pools +and available beaches. Indoor pools, which made +swimming a year-round activity, were becoming even +more numerous than beaches. Swimming was now +established as a sport and a recreation for both men +and women. According to a 1924 magazine article in +the <i>Delineator</i>, seldom was a swimming meet held +anywhere in the country without events for women. +At Palm Beach, however, one of the few remaining +citadels of “high society,” an axiom of fashion dictated +that a lady or gentleman not go into the water before +11:45 in the morning; should one do so, one ran the +risk of being taken for a maid or valet. The masses, +however, swam for pleasure without regard to the +inhibitions of high fashion.</p> + +<p>This period was also marked by the advent of +swimming personalities of both sexes. Johnny Weissmuller +became a popular hero for his accomplishments +in competitive swimming from 1921 to 1929. +Even before the war Annette Kellerman, star of +vaudeville and movies, had become famous for her +fancy diving as well as her celebrated figure, which +she daringly exhibited in a form-fitting, one-piece +suit. In addition to writing an autobiography, she +authored articles and a swimming instruction book +for women. As an example of what exercise, including +swimming, could do for women, Annette Kellerman +also lent her name to a course of physical culture +for less “well-developed” ladies. Another product +of this new age of recreation was Gertrude Ederle, +who learned to swim at the Woman’s Swimming +Association of New York. She rose to sudden fame +in 1926 as the first woman to swim the English Channel.</p> + +<p>As previously stated, swimming was practiced +through the Middle Ages as a useful skill for men. +Gradually this activity became regarded as also +a healthful exercise and then as a recreation. Finally +by the late 19th century swimming also had achieved +the status of a competitive sport—but for men only. +It was not until the 1920s that social attitudes permitted +women the same full use of the water as men.</p> + +<p>The restrictive attitudes defining women’s proper +behavior in the water prior to the 1920s were one<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span> +element of the mores defining women’s participation +in society. Thus as more liberal attitudes gained +acceptance and modified the original concept of +the “weaker sex,” women gradually achieved social +acceptance of their full participation in aquatic +activities.</p> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<h2>Bathing Costume</h2> + +<p>Bathing became popular as a medicinal treatment +for both men and women of the new world in the last +half of the 18th century. It was the only aquatic +activity, however, that was considered proper for +women until over a hundred years later.</p> + +<p>Like so many other customs, changes in bathing +costume styles were initially introduced by way of +England. They were adapted or rejected according +to the special conditions of this continent. To give a +clearer picture of the costume worn in the colonies +and in the United States, descriptions of the English +dress will be included where pertinent. I have not, +however, found any evidence showing that bathing +nude was a practice for women in this country.</p> + +<h3>THE EARLY BATHING GOWN</h3> + +<p>It is disappointing but not surprising to discover +the lack of descriptions pertaining to early bathing +costume. This simple gown was utilitarian, not +decorative. Thus it deserved little attention in the +eyes of the contemporary bather.</p> + +<p>No doubt it is due to the importance of the original +owner that the following example has survived. In +the collection of family memorabilia at Mount +Vernon, there is a chemise-type bathing gown that +is said to have been worn by Martha Washington +(<a href="#Fig6">fig. 6</a>). According to a note attached to the gown +signed by Eliza Parke Custis, and addressed to +“Rosebud,” a pet name for her daughter, Martha +Washington probably wore this bathing gown at +Berkeley Springs as she accompanied her daughter, +Patsy, in her bath.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"><a name="Fig6" id="Fig6"></a> +<img src="images/illo30.jpg" alt="Martha Washington's Bathing Gown" width="350" height="359" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 6.—<span class="smcap">Linen bathing gown</span> said to have been +worn by Martha Washington. (<i>Courtesy of The +Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association.</i>)</p></div> + +<p>This blue and white checked linen gown has +several construction details similar to the chemise, a +woman’s undergarment, of the period. The sleeves +were gathered near the shoulder and were set in +with a gusset at the armpit. The skirt of the gown was +made wider at the bottom by the usual method of +adding four long triangular pieces—one to each side +of both the front and back. The sleeves, however, are +not as full as those one would expect to find on a +chemise of the period. Also a chemise would probably +have had a much wider neckline gathered by a +draw-string threaded through a band at the neck +edge. Instead, this bathing gown has a moderately +low neckline made wider by a slit down the front +which is closed by two linen tapes sewn to either +edge of the front. Although less fabric was used for +the bathing gown than was normally required to +make a chemise, it was probably not because of +functional considerations as one might like to think, +but because of the scarcity of fabric. Close examination +reveals that the triangular sections of fabric +used to add fullness to the skirt consist of several +pieces. In fact the two sections used in the back are +made from a different fabric, although it is still a +blue and white checked linen. Frugal use of scraps in +linings and hidden sections of decorative costume was +common practice in the 18th century. The piecing +of the bathing gown is further evidence of the fact +that it was a garment that had no ornamental purpose.</p> + +<p>Of particular interest are the lead disks which are +wrapped in linen and attached near the hem next +to the side seams by means of patches. No doubt +these weights were used to keep the gown in place +when the bather entered the water.</p> + +<p>The following account of bathing in Dover, England, +in 1782 suggests how the bathing gown might have +been used at Berkeley Springs:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span>The +Ladies in a morning when they intend to bathe, put +on a long flannel gown under their other clothes, walk +down to the beach, undress themselves to the flannel, +then they walk in as deep as they please, and lay hold of +the guides’ hands, three or four together sometimes.</p> + +<p>Then they dip over head twenty times perhaps; then +they come onto the shore where there are women that +attend with towels, cloaks, chairs, etc. The flannel is +stripp’d off, wip’d dry, etc. Women hold cloaks round +them. They dress themselves and go home.<a name="FNanchor_27" +id="FNanchor_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a></p></div> + +<p>The earliest illustration showing costume worn in +the United States for fresh water bathing is dated +1810 (see <a href="#Fig2">fig. 2</a>). Unfortunately the painting reveals +only that the bathing gowns were long and dark +colored in comparison with the white dresses of the +period.</p> + +<p>An 1848 article which described, in detail, the +fashionable dress called for by each activity at summer +resorts, concludes with the following tantalizing +paragraph:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>We have no space for an extended description of suitable +bathing-dresses. They may be procured at any of our +town establishments for the purpose. Much depends upon +individual taste in their arrangement, for uncouth as they +often of necessity are, they can be improved by a little +tact.<a name="FNanchor_28" id="FNanchor_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a></p></div> + +<p>This is the only reference to American bathing costume +of the second quarter of the 19th century that the +author has found at this time. Nevertheless, an +English source describes what must have been a +transitional style between the chemise-type bathing +gown and the more fitted costume of the 1850s.</p> + +<p>The <i>Workwoman’s Guide</i>, published in London, +1840, included instructions for making both a bathing +gown and a bathing cap. Health and modesty were +the main considerations that influenced the choice +of color and type of material.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Bathing gowns are made of blue or white flannel, stuff, +calimanco, or blue linen. As it is especially desirable that +the water should have free access to the person, and yet +that the dress should not cling to, or weigh down the +bather, stuff or calimanco are preferred to most other +materials; the dark coloured gowns are the best for +several reasons, but chiefly because they do not show the +figure, and make the bather less conspicuous than she +would be in a white dress.<a name="FNanchor_29" id="FNanchor_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a></p></div> + +<p>The following details reveal that, in general, this +1840 bathing gown starts as an unshaped garment +similar to the gown attributed to Martha Washington +[brackets are mine].</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>As the width of the materials, of which a bathing gown +is made, varies, it is impossible to say of how many +breadths it should consist. The width at the bottom, when +the gown is doubled, should be about 15 nails [1 nail = 2<sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>4</sub> +in.]: fold it like a pinafore, slope 3<sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>2</sub> nails for the +shoulders, cut or open slits of 3<sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>2</sub> nails long for the armholes, +set in plain sleeves 4<sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>2</sub> nails long, 3<sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>2</sub> nails wide, +and make a slit in front 5 nails long.<a name="FNanchor_30" id="FNanchor_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30" +class="fnanchor">[30]</a></p></div> + +<p>The instructions for finishing this gown, however, +show that the sleeves were worn close around the +wrists and that the fullness of the skirt was secured +at the waist by a belt.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>In making up, delicacy is the great object to be attended +to. Hem the gown at the bottom, gather it into a band +at the top, and run in strings; hem the opening and the +bottom of the sleeves and put in strings. A broad band +should be sewed in about half a yard from the top, to +button round the waist.<a name="FNanchor_31" id="FNanchor_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a></p></div> + +<p>By the addition of the above details this type of +bathing gown more closely approximates the style +of the long-skirted blouse of the 1850s to be described +later.</p> + +<p>In regard to the bathing cap we are told that,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>These are made of oil-silk, and are worn, when bathing, +by ladies who have long hair.... It is advisable, however, +for those who have not long hair, to bathe in plain +linen caps, so as to admit the water without the sand or +grit, and thus the bather, unless prohibited on account +of health, enjoys all the benefit of the shock without +injuring the hair.<a name="FNanchor_32" id="FNanchor_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a></p></div> + +<p>The “Scene at Cape May” (<a href="#Fig3">fig. 3</a>) shows women +wearing long-skirted, long-sleeved, belted gowns as +well as head coverings similar to the type described +in <i>The Workwoman’s Guide</i>.</p> + +<p>Thus during the period when bathing became +popular as a medicinal treatment, women wore loose, +open gowns perhaps patterned after a common undergarment, +the chemise. Although this chemise-type +bathing costume must have been very comfortable +when dry, its fullness was restrictive when wet. The +bather could only immerse herself in water which was +all that was necessary for the treatment. As the +recreational possibilities of bathing began to overshadow<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span> +its health-giving properties, women’s bathing +dresses also became more fitted, following the general +silhouette of women’s fashions.</p> + +<h3>BIFURCATED BATHING DRESS</h3> + +<p>During the first half of the 19th century in England +and the United States, a more tolerant attitude toward +feminine exercise led women to abandon the fiction +that they were not bipedal while bathing. This +acknowledgment, however, was not fostered solely +by the need for a more functional bathing dress. It +was first evidenced by a few daring European women +who wore lace-edged pantaloons trimmed with several +rows of tucking under their daytime dresses. The +shorter, untrimmed, knee-length drawers which +quickly replaced the pantaloons, became an unseen +but essential item in the fashionable English lady’s +toilette of the 1840s. These drawers, or a plainer +version of the longer pantaloons, were adapted not +only to the female riding habit but the bathing dress +as well. An 1828 English source reported that “Many +ladies when riding wear silk drawers similar to what +is worn when bathing.”<a name="FNanchor_33" id="FNanchor_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33" +class="fnanchor">[33]</a> With the increased interest +in physical exercise for women, ankle-length, open +pantaloons also were being worn in the 1840s with a +long overdress as an early form of gymnasium suit. +This evidence of the early use of drawers suggests that, +like English ladies, women in the United States were +probably wearing a type of drawers beneath their +nondescript bathing gowns during the second quarter +of the 19th century. There is some slight support of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span> +this theory in the following stanza of a poem that +appeared in 1845:</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">But go to the beach ere the morning be ended<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And look at the bathers—oh what an array<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The ladies in trowsers, the <i>gemmen</i> in <i>blowses</i><br /></span> +<span class="i0">E’en red flannel shirts are the “go” at Cape May.<a name="FNanchor_34" +id="FNanchor_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a><br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>The rather crude but delightful sketch of seabathing +at Coney Island in 1856 (<a href="#Fig7">fig. 7</a>) shows the +ladies wearing very full, ankle-length, trousers with +a sack top extending loosely only a few inches below +the waist. This type of bathing costume, which was +primarily a bifurcated garment instead of a skirted +one, became the prevailing fashion as reported in +English women’s magazines of the 1860s.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"><a name="Fig7" id="Fig7"></a> +<img src="images/illo33.jpg" alt="Men Looking at Ladies Bathing" width="500" height="322" /> +<p class="caption smcap"><b>scene at coney island—sea bathing illustrated.</b></p> +<p class="caption">Figure 7.—<span class="smcap">Sea bathing at Coney Island</span>, from <i>Frank +Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper</i>, September 1856.<br /> +(Smithsonian photo 58437.)</p></div> + +<p>In contrast to the originally European skirtless +costume, the Philadelphia publication, <i>Peterson’s +Magazine</i>, stated that bathing dress should consist +of a pair of drawers and a long-skirted dress. The +recommended drawers were full and confined at +the ankle by a band that was finished with a ruffle. +These drawers were attached to a “body” and +fastened so that, even if the skirt washed up, the +individual could not possibly be exposed. The dress +was made by pleating or gathering the desired +length of material onto a deep yoke with a separate +belt securing the fullness at the waist. The bottom +of the hem was about three inches above the ankle +and was considered rather short. Loose shirt sleeves +were drawn around the wrist by a band which was +finished with a deep ruffle as a protection against +the sun. According to this article many women wore +a small talma or cape which hid the figure to some +extent. It was recommended that the drawers, dress, +and talma be made of the same woolen material.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Bathing-dresses, although generally very unbecoming can +be made to look very prettily with a little taste. If the +dress is of a plain color, such as grey, blue or brown, a +trimming around the talma, collar, yoke, ruffles etc ..., +of crimson, green or scarlet, is a great addition.<a name="FNanchor_35" +id="FNanchor_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a></p></div> + +<p>To complete a bathing toilette the following items +were considered necessary: a pair of large lisle thread +gloves, an oil cap to protect the hair from the water, +a straw hat to shield the face from the sun, and gum +overshoes for tender feet.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"><a name="Fig8" id="Fig8"></a> +<img src="images/illo37.jpg" alt="Bathing dress" width="250" height="537" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 8.—<span class="smcap">Bathing dress</span>, c. 1855. (<i>Courtesy of Philadelphia +Museum of Art.</i> Photograph by A. J. Wyatt, +staff photographer.)</p></div> + +<p>The red, tan, and blue-green checked bathing dress +shown in <a href="#Fig8">figure 8</a> is jauntily trimmed with crimson +braid edging the collar, belt, and wrist and ankle +bands. This costume is a variation of the style described +previously. The drawers, unlike those described<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span> +in <i>Peterson’s Magazine</i>, are sewn to a linen band +with linen suspenders attached. The unfitted, unshaped +skirt (8 ft. 8 in. in circumference) is pulled in +at the waist by a belt attached to the center back. A +similar technique for forming a waistline is described +in <i>The Workwoman’s Guide</i> of 1840.</p> + +<p>Women’s magazines in the United States from the +third quarter of the 19th century show illustrations of +bathing costume, but in many instances these publications +used European fashion plates. <i>Harper’s Bazar</i>, +(spelled thus until 1929) particularly in its early years, +used fashion plates and pattern supplements from its +German predecessor <i>Der Bazar</i>. Thus, in one issue +one can find a fashion plate showing the predominantly +bifurcated European bathing suit and, in a column on +New York fashions, a separate description of long-skirted +bathing dresses with trousers. During the same +period <i>Peterson’s Magazine</i> had illustrations previously +used in the London publication, <i>Queen’s Magazine</i>.</p> + +<p>American women seem to have accepted the majority +of styles shown in European fashion plates, +except for the skirtless bathing suits. The writer of an +1868 column on New York fashions sought to convince +his readers to try the more daring European style +although he grudgingly admitted that the “Bathing +suits made with trousers and blouse waist without +skirt are objected to by many ladies as masculine and +fast....”<a name="FNanchor_36" id="FNanchor_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36" +class="fnanchor">[36]</a> This style was in fact, very similar to +the costume worn by men when they bathed with the +ladies. A year later, the writer of the same fashion +column had given up the campaign to dress all women +in the skirtless suits and admitted that these imports +“... are worn by expert swimmers, who do not +wish to be encumbered with bulky clothing.”<a name="FNanchor_37" +id="FNanchor_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> Such +practical bathing dress was thus limited to a very +small number of progressive women.</p> + +<p>The majority, consisting of those who were strictly +bathers, wore the ankle-length drawers beneath a +long dress as described or illustrated in the majority +of sources that originated in the United States. Why +was the European bathing suit not fully adopted by +American women? Differences between the bathing +customs of the two continents undoubtedly encouraged +the development of different dress. While men and +women in the United States bathed together freely +at the seashore during the latter half of the 19th +century, this practice was not widely accepted in +England until the early 1900s. In the presence of men, +American women probably felt compelled to retain +their more concealing dress and drawers.</p> + +<p>In England swimming seems to have been more +popular among women than it was in the United +States. While encouraging its readers to swim, during +the late 1860s, <i>Queen’s Magazine</i> used forceful language +of a kind that was not found in American publications +until the late 19th century. If swimming was more +acceptable as a feminine exercise in England it is +understandable why English women were more +receptive to a functional, skirtless bathing suit—especially +since it was worn only in the presence of +other women.</p> + +<p>In 1858, Winslow Homer, who was later to become +a well-known American painter, was welcomed +into the society at Newport until it became apparent +that he wanted to sketch the bathers for a weekly +newspaper (see <a href="#Fig4">fig. 4</a>). So great were the ensuing +objections that he was permitted to complete his +sketches “... provided he depicted the bathers +only in the water and only above the waistline and +without divulging the identity of the bathers.”<a name="FNanchor_38" +id="FNanchor_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a></p> + +<p>As can be seen in <a href="#Fig4">figure 4</a>, these sketches serve more +as a testament of Homer’s fancy than as an accurate +historical statement on style. The two feminine +legs exposed in the water from just below the knee +to the toe and the feminine head coverings appear +to be anachronisms. According to several other +illustrations of the period, these women were undoubtedly +wearing long drawers. The young artist +at 22, however, has been described as having an eye +for feminine beauty and a sense of fashion. He seems +to have exploited to the full the decorative possibilities +of hoop skirts blown by the breeze or agitated by some +pretty accident to discreetly reveal a trim ankle. +A drama of breeze versus long skirt appears with the +small feminine figure in the left background of this +print. The force of the waves and the motion of the +frolicking bathers gave the artist opportunity to show +two more pretty accidents. The only head covering +he showed for feminine bathers was a ruffled cap that +framed the face. Other sources show Newport bathers +wearing the less attractive wide-brimmed straw hat +(<a href="#Fig9">fig. 9</a>). The straw headgear worn over these caps +seems more likely since Newport’s fashionable belles<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span> +would surely have sacrificed appearances and worn a +straw hat to avoid an unfashionable sunburn and tan.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"><a name="Fig9" id="Fig9"></a> +<img src="images/illo40.jpg" alt="Straw Bathing Hat" width="350" height="309" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 9.—<span class="smcap">Bathing hat</span> of natural color and purple +straw, c. 1880. (Smithsonian photo P-65409.)</p></div> + +<p>Nevertheless, Homer’s sketch reflects characteristics +seen in certain surviving examples from the 1860s—namely +that the top was becoming more fitted, being +attached completely to a belt with the fuller skirt +pleated or gathered to the bottom edge of the belt. +In the Design Laboratory Collection of the Brooklyn +Museum there is an 1860 black poplin specimen that +may be a bathing dress. This example is trimmed +at the shoulder seam with epaulets, an example of the +extent to which fashion was finally playing a part in +bathing costume.<a name="FNanchor_39" id="FNanchor_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p> + +<p>The dresses described above appear peculiar not +only to 20th century eyes, but they also seem to have +amused mid-19th century correspondents. One writer +in 1857 declared that,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>We don’t think a man could identify his own wife when +she comes out of the bathing-house. A plump figure enters, +surrounded with a multitude of rustly flounces and +scarcely able to squeeze an enormous hoop through the +door. She is absent a few minutes, and presto change! +out comes a tall lank apparition, wrapped in the scanty +folds of something that looks more like a superannuated +night-gown than anything else, and a battered straw-chapeau +knocked down over the eyes, and stalks down +towards the beach with the air and gait of a Tartar +chieftain!<a name="FNanchor_40" id="FNanchor_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> +[<a href="#Fig10">fig. 10</a>.]</p></div> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"><a name="Fig10" id="Fig10"></a> +<img src="images/illo42.png" alt="Young Lady Before Bathing" width="300" height="383" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 10.—“<span class="smcap">How she went in</span>,” from <i>Harper’s Bazar</i>, +August 1870. (Smithsonian photo 61585A.)</p></div> + +<p>Another writer felt that he</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>... must say—even in the columns of <i>Frank Leslie’s +Illustrated</i>—that they don’t look very picturesque or pretty +when <i>a la Naiade</i>.... Rather limp, sacks tied in the +middle, eel-bottles, hydropathic coalheavers and “longshoremen,” +and preternaturally dilapidated Bloomers, +would appear to be the ideals aimed at.<a name="FNanchor_41" +id="FNanchor_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> +[<a href="#Fig11">fig. 11</a>.]</p></div> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"><a name="Fig11" id="Fig11"></a> +<img src="images/illo43.png" alt="Very Wet Young Lady After Bathing" width="300" height="395" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 11.—“<span class="smcap">How she came out</span>,” from <i>Harper’s +Bazar</i>, August 1870. (Smithsonian photo 61585B.)</p></div> + +<p>This use of the term “Bloomers,” referring to long full +drawers or trousers, is a reminder of how similar the +1855 bathing gown with drawers (see <a href="#Fig8">fig. 8</a>) was +to the reform dress introduced in 1848 and worn by +Amelia Bloomer, the feminist, in 1852.</p> + +<p>Despite the evident use of a new waistline treatment, +the most popular bathing costume of the +1870s, according to <i>Harper’s Bazar</i>, continued to +feature the yoke blouse that reached at least to the +knee. This combination of blouse and skirt was held +in position at the waist by a belt. The high neck was +finished with a sailor collar or a standing pleated +frill, while the long sleeves and full Turkish trousers, +buttoned on the side of the ankle, concealed the +limbs. In 1873 a column on New York fashions +reported an effort to popularize short-sleeved, low-throated +suits then in favor at European bathing +places and which had been illustrated in the <i>Bazar</i>. +Nevertheless, the writer hedged this report by adding +that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>It is thought best, however, to provide an extra pair of +long sleeves that may be buttoned on or basted in the +short puffs that are sewn in the arm holes. Sometimes a +small cape fastening closely about the throat is also +added.<a name="FNanchor_42" id="FNanchor_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a></p></div> + +<p>Nevertheless, sketches of bathing scenes from the +seventies indicate that some American women wore +even shorter sleeves and trousers than those prescribed +by the fashion magazines.</p> + +<p>Linen and wool fabrics were both suggested in the +1840s, but by the 1870s flannel was most frequently +used for bathing dresses, with serge also being recommended. +Navy blue, and to a lesser extent, white, +gray, scarlet, and brown were popular colors in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</a></span> +checks as well as solid colors trimmed with white, +red, gray, or blue worsted braid.</p> + +<p>Bathing mantles or cloaks were worn to conceal +the moist figure when crossing the beach. These +garments were made of Turkish toweling with wide +sleeves and hoods, and were so long as “to barely +escape” the ground.</p> + +<p>In 1873 one good bathing cap was described as an +oiled silk bag-crown cap large enough to hold the hair +loosely. The frill around the edge was bound with +colored braid. Many ladies preferred, however, to +let their hair hang loose and under a wide-brimmed +hat of coarse straw tied down on the sides to protect +their skin from the sun (<a href="#Fig9">fig. 9</a>).</p> + +<p>Bathing shoes or slippers were generally worn when +the shore was rough and uneven. In 1871 manila +sandals were worn, but the most functional bathing +shoes are said to have been high buskins of thick +unbleached cotton duck with cork soles. They were +secured with checked worsted braid. Two years later +there were bathing shoes of white duck or sail canvas +with manila soles. Slippers for walking in the sand +were “mules” or merely toes and soles made of +flannel, braided to match the cloak, and sewn to +cork soles.</p> + +<p>Throughout this period the social aspect of bathing +predominated over the therapeutic goals and women +were making a greater effort to transform their bathing +garments into attractive and functional outfits. +Motivated by the presence of men at the seashore and +by the competition with other women for masculine +attention, ladies were more concerned with the style +of their bathing dresses and appropriate trimmings. +Thus bathing costume joined the ranks of other +fashions described in women’s magazines.</p> + +<p>Now that women were frolicking in the water +rather than simply being dunked several times, +their costume became somewhat more functional. +Long trousers gave them greater freedom in the water +although the skirts which continued to be worn,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span> +tended to negate this improvement. Even as early as +the 1870s there were efforts to shorten sleeves and +eliminate high necklines. This trend to make bathing +dress more practical increased in momentum toward +the end of the century.</p> + +<h3>PRINCESS STYLE BATHING DRESS</h3> + +<p>Although attitudes toward sports were more enlightened +by the 1880s, many women continued to +wear the old bathing dress with its belted blouse +extending to a long skirt and a pair of trousers. As an +alternate to this garb, the “princess style” was developed +with the blouse and trousers cut in one piece or +else sewn permanently to the same belt. A separate +skirt extending below the knee was buttoned at the +waist to conceal the figure. This new style in bathing +costume was probably derived from an innovation in +women’s underwear. During the late 1870s a new +style of undergarment, the “combination” of chemise +and drawers, had come into use. Petticoats could be +fastened to buttons sewn around the waist of the +combination. This streamlining of undergarments +helped the lady of fashion to maintain a desirably +svelte figure. Apparently the advantages of this +streamlining were obvious, because it was not long +before women were quietly adapting this style to +bathing dresses. By the 1890s the skirt was often +omitted for swimming (<a href="#Fig12">fig. 12</a>), giving the more +active women more freedom in the water. Following +popular dress styles, the top of the bathing costume +was bloused over the belt. The sailor collar, either +large or small, was a great favorite, but a straight +standing collar with rows of white braid was also worn.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"><a name="Fig12" id="Fig12"></a> +<img src="images/illo44.png" alt="Display of Fashionable Bathing Costumes" width="500" height="326" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 12.—<span class="smcap">Bathing costumes</span> from a supplement to <i>The +Tailor’s Review</i>, July 1895.<br /> +(<i>Courtesy of Library of Congress.</i>)</p></div> + +<p>The “princess style” was not the only innovation +available in bathing dress. <i>Harper’s Bazar</i> reported in +1881 that imported French bathing suits<a name="FNanchor_43" id="FNanchor_43"></a><a +href="#Footnote_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> for ladies<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span> +were made without sleeves, since any covering on the +arm interfered with the freedom desirable for swimming. +Nevertheless, according to other contemporary +fashion descriptions, American bathing suits retained +their long sleeves until the early 1880s when the +foreign fashion of short sleeves came to the United +States. In 1885 it was reported that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The sleeves may be the merest ‘caps’ four or five inches +deep under the arm, curved narrow toward the top, and +lapped there or they may be half-long and straight, +reaching to the elbows, or else they may be the regular +coat sleeves covering the arms to the wrist. With the short +sleeves it is customary to add the sleeves cut from a gauze +vest to give the arm some protection from the sun.<a name="FNanchor_44" +id="FNanchor_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a></p></div> + +<p>Sleeves were pushed up in 1890 and puffed high about +the shoulders by means of elastic tape in the hem. By +1893 fashion reports acknowledged that sleeve length +was a matter of individual choice.</p> + +<p>Despite this neat resolution of the diminishing +sleeve, contemporary sketches of bathing scenes +indicate that some women in the United States were +wearing the shorter sleeves even earlier.</p> + +<p>Short full trousers, reaching just below the knee, +accompanied by knee-length skirts—sometimes worn +even shorter—succeeded the long Turkish trousers +and ankle-length skirt. As the trousers diminished in +length, long stockings or bathing shoes with long +stocking tops became a necessary part of the bathing +costume to cover the lower limbs, particularly in +mixed bathing (see <a href="#Fig1">fig. 1</a>). The stockings, which were +cotton or wool, plain or fancy, and of any color or +combination of colors in keeping with the costume, +were worn with a variety of bathing shoes, sandals, or +slippers when bathing off a rocky shore. Foot coverings +were usually made of white canvas; the slippers +were held on by a spiral arrangement of braid or +ribbon about the ankles, while the laced shoes were +often made with heavy cork soles. A gaiter shoe or +combination shoe and stocking was made of waterproof +cloth, laced up the sides, and reached to about +the knees. Low rubber shoes were also worn.</p> + +<p>Bathing caps of waxed linen or oiled silk were used +to protect the hair. They had whale bone in the brim +and could be adjusted by drawstrings in the back. +Blue, white, or ecru rubber hats were also used. These +caps had large full crowns—which held in all the +hair—and wired brims. A wide-brimmed rough straw +hat, tied on with a strip of trimming braid or with +ribbon, was sometimes worn as protection against +the sun (<a href="#Fig9">fig. 9</a>).</p> + +<p>Bathing mantles like those of the 1870s were still +being worn by the late 19th century and these were +frequently trimmed with colored braid. Cotton tapes +sewn in parallel rows, mohair braid, or strips of +flannel were still being used to make the bathing +dress more attractive.</p> + +<p>Navy blue and white, as well as ecru, maroon, gray, +and olive were popular colors for the bathing dress. +In 1890 the writer of a fashion column thought it +pertinent to add that “... black bathing suits are +worn as a matter of choice, not merely by those +dressing in mourning.”<a name="FNanchor_45" id="FNanchor_45"></a><a +href="#Footnote_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a> Apparently the wearing of +black no longer had this exclusive significance when +bathing, but prior to 1890 it did.</p> + +<p>As women became more active in the water and +were learning to swim they began to accept more +practical changes in bathing costume. Not only the +style, as described previously, but also the fabric was +considered for its functional characteristics. Flannel +was still widely used but was being replaced by serge +which was not as heavy when wet. Another indication +of this trend was that stockinet, a knitted material, +was gaining in popularity at the end of the century.</p> + +<p>The “princess style” of the early 1890s combined +the drawers and bodice in one garment: the separate +skirt fell just short of the ends of the drawers which +covered the knees. By the mid-1890s, however, the +drawers which were now called knickerbockers, were +shortened so as to be completely covered by the knee-length +skirt. These knickerbockers were either attached +to the waist in the popular “princess style” or they +were fastened to the waist by a series of flat bone +buttons.</p> + +<p>During this same period, the mid-1890s, knitted, +cotton tights were sometimes worn in place of +knickerbockers. Bathing tights differed from the +knickerbockers in that they were hemmed rather +than gathered on an elastic band at the lower edge +and that they were not attached to the waist. When +tights were used they were completely concealed +by a one-piece, knee-length bathing dress. The use +of the more streamlined bathing tights was another +step toward more functional bathing costume. +Despite these improvements, most women continued +to wear stockings, usually black, when they<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span> +bathed or swam in public. The dictates of fashion +and standards of modesty continued to conflict with +practical considerations.</p> + +<p>As with street dress, corsets seem to have been an +important though unseen bathing article necessary +for maintaining smart posture. In 1896 it was reported +that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Unless a woman is very slender, bathing corsets should be +worn. If they are not laced tightly they are a help instead +of a hindrance to swimming, and some support is needed +for a figure that is accustomed to wearing stays.<a name="FNanchor_46" +id="FNanchor_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a></p></div> + +<p>While describing the bathing dresses available in +1910 an article noted: “Some of these are made up +with ... princess forms that are boned so as to do +away with the bathing corset.”<a name="FNanchor_47" id="FNanchor_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a></p> + +<p>The bodice of the bathing costume continued to +be bloused, but by 1905 it was modified to be merely +loose. An article appearing in 1896 noted that bathing +suits should be cut high in the neck, not tight around +the throat, but close enough to prevent burning by +the sun. The sailor collar continued to be used during +the late 1890s but became less fashionable shortly +after the turn of the century. Nevertheless there had +to be some white around the neck for the bathing +dress to be considered smart. The puffed sleeves, +which had become popular in the late 1890s were +modified in breadth and length to allow free use of +the muscles in swimming (<a href="#Fig13">fig. 13</a>).</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"><a name="Fig13" id="Fig13"></a> +<img src="images/illo49.jpg" alt="Black Mohair Bathing Dress" width="300" height="516" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 13.—<span class="smcap">Bathing dress of black “mohair,”</span> +c. 1900. (Smithsonian photo 60383.)</p></div> + +<p>In 1897 fashion magazines were suggesting that +skirts of bathing dresses looked best when the front +breadth was shaped narrower toward the belt, +while by 1902 the skirts were fitted over the hips in +order to delineate the figure. In 1905 pleated skirts +again became fashionable, although flared skirts +were still acceptable.</p> + +<p>Dark blue and black were the popular colors, +although white, red, gray, and green were also used. +Flannel was no longer recommended for bathing +dress; serge and “mohair”—a fabric with a cotton +warp and a mohair or alpaca weft—were widely +used. The impractical bathing dress of silk fabric +was worn by those who could afford this extravagance; +thus, the conspicuous consumption of the “leisure +class” was even found at the beaches.</p> + +<p>Bathing hats were still being worn but it was +considered more fashionable to wear a rubber or +oil silk cap covered with a bright silk turban when +there was a surf. For the bather who seldom ventured +very far into the water the most fashionable practice +was to have no covering at all.</p> + +<p>Throughout the 19th century bathing costume +followed an impelling course toward becoming more +functional. As the popularity of recreational bathing +and then swimming for women increased, the number +of yards of fabric required to make a bathing dress +decreased. Nevertheless, by the 1900s, many women +knew how to swim, but the majority were still bathers. +Thus bathing suits continued in use through the +first quarter of the 20th century.</p> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></p> +<h2>Swimming Costume</h2> + +<p>Bathing costume did not evolve gracefully into the +swim suit, nor was there an abrupt replacement of +one garment for the other. Instead, a garb designed +for swimming emerged in the 19th century as tentatively +and as poorly received as had the suggestion +that women should be active in the water. The growing +popularity of swimming and the changing status +of women eventually made it possible for the swimming +suit to replace the bathing suit in the 1920s. By +the 1930s, however, this trend was accelerated by a +growing advertising and ready-to-wear clothing +industry. Thus a history of the swimming costume +tends to divide itself into two sections: early swimming +suits and the influence of the swim suit industry.</p> + +<h3>EARLY SWIMMING SUITS</h3> + +<p>The earliest reference to swimming costume I have +found was in 1869. At this date swimming in the +United States was considered a masculine skill, +exercise, and recreation; only men were provided +with a real opportunity to swim at popular watering +places. As described previously, <i>Harper’s Bazar</i> +reported that American women in general rejected +the European bathing suit made with long trousers +and a skirtless waist. Nevertheless, this costume was +“... worn by expert swimmers, who do not wish to +be encumbered with bulky clothing.”<a name="FNanchor_48" id="FNanchor_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a></p> + +<p>In the 1870s the rare descriptions of this more +functional garment—called “swimming suit” even +at this early date—were limited to a sentence or two +buried within long columns of fine print describing +popular bathing apparel. One mentions a “... +single knitted worsted garment, fitting the figure, with +waist and trousers in one.”<a name="FNanchor_49" id="FNanchor_49"></a><a +href="#Footnote_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> Another was made without +sleeves as “one garment, the blouse and trousers +being cut all in one, like the sleeping garments worn +by small children.”<a name="FNanchor_50" id="FNanchor_50"></a><a +href="#Footnote_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> These more practical bifurcated +garments probably derived from the European suit +of the 1860s that had been rejected by the majority of +American women. For example, an English source +reported that in 1866 the following garment was +worn: “... Swimming Costume, a body and +trousers cut in one, secures perfect liberty of action +and does not expose the figure.”<a name="FNanchor_51" id="FNanchor_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51" class="fnanchor">[51]</a></p> + +<p>The descriptions of American swimming suits, +however brief, offered evidence that the pastime was +growing in popularity with women. Generally +speaking, 19th century women’s magazines were mere +disseminators of fine and decorous ideas and practices +for well-mannered ladies; their editors were not +innovators. With such an editorial policy it is understandable +that these magazines would not, as a rule, +publicize trends of popular origin until they were +fairly well established. The skirtless swimming suit of +the 1870s was no doubt more common in the United +States than its meager description in <i>Harper’s Bazar</i> +would seem to indicate.</p> + +<p>As long as feminine swimming was not generally +accepted, however, efforts to develop practical swimming +suits remained isolated owing to the lack of +communication between manufacturer and consumer +and to traditional attitudes. Feminine interest in +swimming and physical activities threatened belief +in the “weaker-sex” that contributed to maintaining +the traditional masculine and feminine roles; efforts +to develop functional swimming dress also attacked +established standards of feminine modesty. These +challenges to the status quo were met with the weapon +of the complacent majority—silence. Consequently, +from the third quarter of the 19th century, when we +find the first reference to a specialized garment for +swimming in the United States, writings on swimming +costume appeared infrequently until the 1920s.</p> + +<p>In 1886 two “ladies’ bathing jerseys” and two bathing +suits of the traditional type appeared in the <i>First +Illustrated Catalogue of Knitted Bathing Suits</i> of J. J. +Pfister Company in San Francisco. The captions +over the illustrations leave no question that the +briefer bathing jerseys were intended for swimming +while the others were for bathing. These jerseys—form-fitting +tunics that were mid-thigh in length—were +made with high necks and cap sleeves. Underneath +this garment women wore trunks that extended +to the knee and stockings; there was also the alternate +choice of tights, a combination of trunks and stockings. +To complete the outfit the feminine reader was +encouraged to buy a knitted skull cap.</p> + +<p>Apparently these bathing jerseys were successful; +three, instead of two, jerseys appeared in the same<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</a></span> +catalog in 1890. It is obvious from this later catalog, +however, that there was a greater demand for bathing +dresses since twelve designs of the skirted costume +were featured as opposed to the two dresses in the +first issue.</p> + +<p>Even by the early 20th century it is difficult to find +specific references to a swimming suit in women’s +magazines; only occasionally does a concern with +swimming obtrude into the traditional descriptions of +bathing dress. In <i>The Woman’s Book of Sports</i>, however, +J. Parmly Paret was specific about the requirements +for a suitable swimming costume in 1901.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>It is particularly important that nothing tight should be +worn while swimming, no matter how fashionable a dress +may be for bathing. The exercise requires the greatest +freedom, and a swimming costume should never include +corsets, tight sleeves, or a skirt below the knees. The +freedom of the shoulders is the most important of all, but +anything tight around the body interferes with the +breathing and the muscles of the back, while a long skirt—even +one a few inches below the knees—binds the legs +constantly in making their strokes.<a name="FNanchor_52" id="FNanchor_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a></p></div> + +<p>Although this costume (<a href="#Fig14">fig. 14</a>) more closely resembles +the traditional bathing dress than the jersey described +previously, this discussion illustrates the growing +dichotomy between bathing dress and swimming dress +and between fashionable styles and functional styles.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"><a name="Fig14" id="Fig14"></a> +<img src="images/illo53.jpg" alt="Sailor-Style Swimming Suit with Black Stockings" width="175" height="536" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 14.—<span class="smcap">The recommended costume for swimming</span> +from J. Parmly Paret, <i>The Woman’s Book of +Sports</i>, 1901. (Smithsonian photo 58436.)</p></div> + +<p>Photographs of East coast beach scenes in 1903 show +a few women wearing costumes different from the +black or navy blue bathing dress worn by the majority. +These independent spirits seem to be wearing close-fitting +knitted trunks that cover the knees or, when +with stockings, come within an inch or two above the +knee. Above these trunks they appear to be wearing +knitted one-piece tunics or belted blouses that cover +the hips. This costume, sleeveless or short-sleeved, +and with a simplified neckline, must have been the +functional suit of its day.</p> + +<p>An important impetus was given to the development +of the swimming suit with the entrance of women into +swimming as a competitive sport. On September 5, +1909, Adeline Trapp wore a one-piece knitted swimming +suit when she became the first woman to swim +across the East River in New York, through the +treacherous waters of Hell Gate. Both the swimming +suit and the swim were part of a campaign devised by +Wilbert Longfellow—of the U.S. Volunteer Life +Saving Corps—to encourage women to learn to swim.</p> + +<p>Adeline Trapp was a summer employee of the Life +Saving Corps in 1909. Mr. Longfellow saw in the +20-year-old Brooklyn school teacher a respectable +young woman who could be a source of publicity. +He ordered her to get a one-piece swimming suit +for the swim. As early as 1899 in England, a woman<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[26]</a></span> +participating in competitions organized by the Amateur +Swimming Association could have worn a one-piece, +skirtless, knitted costume with a shaped sleeve +at least three inches long, a slightly scooped neck, +and legs that extended to within three inches of the +knee. Mr. Longfellow may have had this English +suit in mind. He might have known of similar suits +in the United States or he might have simply wanted +to free Adeline of yards of fabric to make her more +competitive with male swimmers. Nevertheless, +Adeline Trapp did not know that the English suits +existed, nor did she know where she could find one. +She spent many hours going from one American +manufacturer to another trying on men’s knitted +suits. She found that they were all cut too low at the +neck and armholes and did not cover enough of the +legs to preclude criticism. At this point a friend who +worked for a stocking manufacturer offered to get +her a suitable costume from England. This costume, +a knitted, gray cotton suit—whether originally for a +man or woman in England is not known—was the +one Adeline wore when she swam Hell Gate.</p> + +<p>Although more than thirty men attempted the +swim, the fact that a woman accomplished the feat +made newspaper headlines. Following this event, +Miss Trapp received a terse letter from the Brooklyn +School Board stating that they thought it improper +for an educator of Brooklyn children to appear in +public so scantily dressed in a one-piece swimming +costume. For her future swims Adeline Trapp was +careful to have someone carry a blanket to throw +over her as she emerged from the water.<a name="FNanchor_53" id="FNanchor_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a></p> + +<p>In 1910, Annette Kellerman arrived in the United +States from Australia by way of England. For her +fancy diving exhibitions she wore sleeveless one-piece +knitted swimming tights that covered her from +neck to toe—a costume she had probably adopted +in England.</p> + +<p>The decade from 1910 to 1920 was a crucial period +in the history of bathing and swimming costume. +Popular attitudes were changing in favor of the woman +who swam but, as frequently occurs in social reforms, +there was a cultural lag between public opinion and +the policies of institutions. The Red Cross, which +began its excellent water safety program in 1914, +taught women to swim but did not admit women as +Life Saving Corps members until 1920. Symbolic of +the conflict between old and new attitudes were the +relative roles of bathing and swimming costume during +this period. As Annette Kellerman described them:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>There are two kinds ... those that are adapted for use +in water, and those that are unfit for use except on dry +land. If you are going to swim, wear a water bathingsuit. +But if you are merely going to play on the beach, and +pose for the camera fiends, you may safely wear the dry +land variety.... I am certain that there isn’t a single +reason under the sun why everybody should not wear +lightweight suits. Anyone who persuades you to wear the +heavy skirty kind is endangering your life.<a name="FNanchor_54" +id="FNanchor_54"></a><a href="#Footnote_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a></p></div> + +<p>Chic women’s magazines, however, were still reluctant +to admit in their fashion pages that a more utilitarian +costume existed. The June 1, 1917 issue of +<i>Vogue</i> reported that there were two kinds of bathing +suits: a loose straight suit and those on surplice lines, +“... which hold their place by virtue of being so very +becoming.”<a name="FNanchor_55" id="FNanchor_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</a></p> + +<p>The most popular of these, the surplice, was not a +novelty of the season but a continuation of 19th century +bathing suit styles. Fashion illustrations show +that the hemline of the skirt was approaching the +middle of the knee, with the bloomers remaining +hidden. There was also a revival of the style that permitted +the bloomers to show several inches below the +skirt. In this case the bloomers reached the knee and +the skirt was several inches shorter. Both versions were +shown with short sleeves or cap sleeves, or sleeveless; +“<span class="lettsymb">V</span>” necklines with collars and square necklines were +widely used. The more fashionable creations were +made of silk taffeta or “surf satin,” while the majority +were made of “mohair,” wool jersey, worsted, or +closely woven cotton. Black and navy blue were unquestionably +the favorite colors.</p> + +<p>The loose straight suit, which evidently gained its +inspiration from the chemise frock of the period, had +no waistline and hung straight from the shoulders +(<a href="#Fig15">fig. 15</a>); a belt or sash was frequently looped below +the natural waistline on the hips. The chemise-type of +bathing suit differed from the surplice only in having +no fitted waist and requiring less fabric.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 275px;"><a name="Fig15" id="Fig15"></a> +<img src="images/illo57.jpg" alt="Black Silk Bathing Dress" width="225" height="488" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 15.—<span class="smcap">Black silk bathing dress</span>, 1923.<br /> +(Smithsonian photo P-65412.)</p></div> + +<p>In the June 15, 1917 issue, <i>Vogue</i> modified its +position of two weeks earlier to acknowledge that +there was a third style of costume worn in the water. +Again, the descriptions of the surplice and chemise-type +bathing suits were accompanied by numerous<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</a></span> +illustrations. No drawings, however, were published +to show the knitted jersey suit that was described as +“... usually sleeveless, quite short and fairly +straight ...” and “... intended for the woman +who swims expertly.”<a name="FNanchor_56" id="FNanchor_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</a></p> + +<p>As late as the early 1920s, the fashion pages of +<i>Harper’s Bazar</i> and <i>Vogue</i> were concentrated on the +bathing suits, aiming at readers involved in the +social life of the seaside resorts—lounging about the +beach with occasional splashing in the water. The +growing numbers of women who wanted swimming +suits, however, had only to turn to the advertising +sections of these same magazines to find that even in +1915 such shops as Bonwit Teller & Co. and +B. Altman & Co. were advertising knitted swimming +suits.</p> + +<p>In June 1916, <i>Delineator</i> solved the dilemma of +bathing versus swimming costume in an intriguing +article written to sell a pattern for a bathing costume. +In description and presentation of illustrations, the +article emphasized a costume with “all the features +essential to a practical swimming-suit.”<a name="FNanchor_57" +id="FNanchor_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a> The blouse +and bloomers were attached at the waist in this +garment which had a square neckline and no skirt +or sleeves. Made up in wool jersey, this would have +been a practical swimming costume for the period. +But this was not the only style available from this +one pattern. The following variations were included: +a sailor collar on a “<span class="lettsymb">V</span>” neckline; a high-standing +collar, long sleeves; and a detachable skirt with the +fullness either pleated or gathered into a waistband, +to be worn long to the knees or just short enough to +show several inches of the bloomer. In this way +<i>Delineator</i> succeeded in satisfying nearly every degree +of conservatism—an amazing accomplishment.</p> + +<p>The spring edition of <i>Sears, Roebuck and Co. Catalog</i> +for 1916 offered a one-piece, or “California-style,” +knitted worsted bathing suit with the underpiece +sewn to a skirt. This costume was less elaborate than +the other dresses shown, although it was still knee +length. The 1918 spring catalog showed two one-piece +knitted outfits suitable for swimming in striking +contrast to the surplice bathing dresses that were +also offered. By 1920 all of the bathing costumes +illustrated in the <i>Sears, Roebuck and Co. Catalog</i> were +of the more abbreviated and functional type.</p> + +<p>In 1918 Annette Kellerman recommended that +serious swimmers wear close-fitting swimming tights +or the two-piece suits commonly worn by men. Being<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</a></span> +quick to admit that this costume would not be tolerated +at all beaches, she told dedicated swimmers to</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>... get one-piece tights anyway and wear over the tights +the lightest garment you can get. It should be a loose +sleeveless garment hung from the shoulders. Never have +a tight waist band. It is a hindrance. Also on beaches +where stockings are enforced your one-piece undergarment +should have feet, so that the separate stocking +and its attendant garter is abolished.<a name="FNanchor_58" id="FNanchor_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_58" class="fnanchor">[58]</a></p></div> + +<p>Knitted swimming suits found in advertisements of +the period were either one-piece or two-piece; the +trunks were attached or separate, but they always +extended a few inches below the brief skirt. Although +this costume could be considered sleeveless, in some +examples the suit was built up under the arm—a concession +to the demands of modesty (<a href="#Fig16">fig. 16</a>). The +scooped or “<span class="lettsymb">V</span>” neckline with no collar was relatively +high; in order to put on or remove the suit it was unbuttoned +at one shoulder.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"><a name="Fig16" id="Fig16"></a> +<img src="images/illo59.jpg" alt="Knitted Woolen Swimming Suit" width="350" height="460" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 16.—<span class="smcap">One-piece swimming suit of knitted +wool</span>, c. 1918. (Smithsonian photo P-65413.)</p></div> + +<p>It was this type of swimming costume which evolved +into the garment that dominated the fashion pages of +the mid-1920s.</p> + +<p>Changes in costume brought about by the acceptance +of swimming also affected leg covering. By 1920 +fashion pages showed stockings that reached only to +the calf and many advertisements for the abbreviated +knitted bathing suits presented the lower leg covered +with only the high laced bathing shoe (<a href="#Fig17">fig. 17</a>) or, in a +few cases, bare. Bathing slippers were black satin or +black or white canvas held on the feet by ribbon criss-crossed +up the leg to tie at mid-calf. Shoes were of +satin or canvas, laced in the front to mid-calf.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;"><a name="Fig17" id="Fig17"></a> +<img src="images/illo62.jpg" alt="Bathing Shoes" width="350" height="224" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 17.—<span class="smcap">Bathing shoes</span>, 1910. (Smithsonian photo +P-65417.)</p></div> + +<p>There was a wide variety of colorful rubber caps; +some were gathered on a band or with a ruffle while +others were closely fitted with brims. Also popular +was a close-fitting rubber cap with a colorful scarf tied +around it; swimmers did without the scarf.</p> + +<p>Despite the distinction between the two types of +bathing apparel, the beach cloak continued to be used +by both the serious swimmer and those who stayed +safely in the shallows. Some bathing wraps had large +collars and were only mid-calf in length. Colorful +beach hats, beach parasols, bags, and blankets were +used, particularly by the bather who seldom got wet.</p> + +<p>The acceptance of swimming as a feminine activity +provided an impetus for the use of the knitted swimming +suit; but standards of modesty had to change +before this suit could gain wide acceptance. Bathing +dresses of the 19th century had been designed to +cover, conceal, and obscure not only the torso but the +limbs as well. The swimming suit that was gaining +acceptance in the early 1920s not only revealed the +arms and a good part of the legs, but actually dared to +follow the lines of the torso. Contemporary descriptions, +that seem amusingly cautious today, included +such statements as “... all Annette Kellerman Bathing +Attire is distinguished by an incomparable, daring +beauty of fit that always remains refined.”<a name="FNanchor_59" +id="FNanchor_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_59" class="fnanchor">[59]</a> Even +less cautious was a statement that these bathing suits +were “famous ... for their perfect fit and exquisite, +plastic beauty of line.”<a name="FNanchor_60" id="FNanchor_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_60" class="fnanchor">[60]</a></p> + +<p>The growing numbers of women who wore the +new styles of bathing dress were a cause of concern to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</a></span> +self-appointed guardians of decency. In 1917 the +convention of the American Association of Park +Superintendents at New Orleans adopted a series +of bathing regulations for city beaches which dealt +with the problems of the changing bathing suit. In +general these regulations specified that “... No all-white +or flesh-colored suits are permitted or suits that +expose the chest lower than a line drawn on a level +with the arm pits.”<a name="FNanchor_61" id="FNanchor_61"></a><a +href="#Footnote_61" class="fnanchor">[61]</a> In regard to ladies’ bathing +suits these men agreed that</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Blouse and bloomer suits may be worn with or without +stockings, provided the blouse has quarter-arm sleeves or +close-fitting arm holes, and provided the bloomers are +full and not shorter than four inches above the knee.<a name="FNanchor_62" +id="FNanchor_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62" class="fnanchor">[62]</a></p></div> + +<p>Regulations for knitted suits were similar, with the +added caution that the skirt hem could be no more +than two inches above the lower edge of the trunks. +As late as 1923 these regulations were in effect at +public beaches in Cleveland and Chicago.</p> + +<p>By 1923 a permanent change was occurring in the +design of beach apparel. The chemise-style bathing +dress of black taffeta or satin still appeared in the +fashion magazines (<a href="#Fig15">fig. 15</a>), but by 1929 it had disappeared. +The result of the struggle between the fancy +bathing suit and the plain knitted suit became obvious +even in the popular magazines of the period. In the +opening paragraphs of a short story, Shirley, the villainess, +donned a smart bathing suit of puffy black +taffeta, with a patent-leather belt and a scarlet scarf, +and baked in the shadow of a big umbrella. Margaret, +the heroine, in a plain knitted suit and black cap was +intent only upon diving, plunging, and splashing for +her own enjoyment. In another story a young lady, +who came out of the sea wearing a “... bathing suit +so scanty it seemed a mere gesture flung carelessly to +the proprieties ...” described herself as a modern +young woman.<a name="FNanchor_63" id="FNanchor_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_63" class="fnanchor">[63]</a></p> + +<p>In the early twenties advertisements capitalized on +the functional characteristics of swimming suits. A +1923 advertisement declared:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>No! No! Not a bathing suit! No! The Wil Wite is a +swimming suit. The difference is great—very great. A +bathing suit is something in which to “Sun” oneself and +wear on the beach. A swimming suit is a garment made +expressly for those who swim. It is free from frills and +furbelows. It follows the form with the same sincerity +that a neat silk stocking clings to a trim ankle. It fits when +dry or wet ... it is a real swimming suit.<a name="FNanchor_64" +id="FNanchor_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64" class="fnanchor">[64]</a></p></div> + +<p>The knitted swimming suit which achieved dominance +over the bathing suit in the 1920s was similar to +its earlier version except that both the armhole and +the neckline were lower. This made it possible to put +on the suit without unbuttoning one of the straps at +the shoulder—a feature that was omitted in this newer +style. Sometimes a sash was looped loosely around the +waist; a geometrically shaped monogram provided a +smart decoration. The affluent swimmer could distinguish +herself from the masses by wearing silk jersey. +During the last half of this decade women coquettishly +adopted a man’s swimming suit, consisting of a +striped sleeveless jersey shirt with dark colored trunks +and a white belt.</p> + +<p>Perhaps the last stand for the bathing dress was the +appearance of the “dressmaker suit” toward the end +of the 1920s and on into the early 1930s. The neck and +shoulder line copied those of currently fashionable +evening dresses, with a parallel treatment of the skirt, +which was shortened to end just below the hips. This +suit was worn by women reluctant to brave the revealingly +unadorned but popular swimming suit.</p> + +<p>A depilatory advertisement took advantage of the +increasing “stockingless vogue” and explained that +“Women who love swimming for the sake of the sport, +find stockings a great hindrance to their enjoyment.”<a name="FNanchor_65" +id="FNanchor_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_65" class="fnanchor">[65</a>]<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</a></span> +By the end of the twenties, the stocking for bathing and +swimming had become an article of the past.</p> + +<p>Although women were accepted in athletics and +had achieved a generally wider role in public life, +white, untanned skin was still the ideal in the 1920s. +Thus sunproof creams, beach coats, and beach umbrellas +were still important.</p> + +<p>According to the well-known “trickle-down” +theory of fashion, styles of dress first become fashionable +among the socially elite and wealthy and are +then, in time, emulated by those at lower socio-economic +levels. The knitted swimming suit, however, +entered the fashion pages by a different route. It had +its insignificant start with the skirtless bifurcated +garments of the late 1860s. Going against popular +opinion, some women did swim. They violated prevalent +standards of modesty by continuing to wear a +functional suit. Gradually the demand grew. A plain, +utilitarian garment was needed; pressure increased. +Thus, by the 1920s the swimming suit prevailed, +complimenting the image of the newly emancipated +“modern woman.”</p> + +<h3>SWIM SUIT INDUSTRY</h3> + +<p>Along with the increased popularity of swimming +and the appearance of the knitted swimming suit we +note the rapid development of the ready-to-wear +swim suit industry. During the last half of the 19th +century women frequently made their own bathing +dresses with the aid of paper pattern supplements +that appeared in women’s magazines of the period. +Dressmakers also may have used these patterns to +outfit their clients for their summer excursions. On the +other hand, ladies in the large cities could purchase +bathing dresses at furnishing stores or rent them at +the large public beaches. A small advertisement in +<i>Harper’s Bazar</i>, August 9, 1873, announced that in +addition to gauze undershirts, linen drawers, collars +and cuffs, Union Adams & Co. of New York had +bathing dresses for sale. The notice is noteworthy +when one considers that the ready-to-wear clothing +industry and the field of advertising were in their +infancy.</p> + +<p>With the increased popularity of the knitted suit, +knitting mills included men’s and women’s swimming +apparel in their more prosaic lines of underwear and +sweaters. Many companies advertised the new product, +steadily increasing their range until the inevitable +occurred. In 1921 a national advertising campaign +for swimming suits was initiated by Jantzen, a +hitherto obscure knitting mill whose production had +been limited to sweaters, woolen hosiery, and jackets +for Chinese workmen. Capitalizing on the growing +interest in swimming, Jantzen prominently advertised +swimming suits instead of bathing dresses. The +retail stores selling these suits advertised locally, +but national advertising became the domain of the +manufacturers, educating the public to associate +certain positive qualities with their names.</p> + +<p>To the delight of the swim suit industry, swimming +was more than a passing vogue. In 1934, a National +Recreation Association study on the use of leisure +time found that among ninety-four free-time activities +swimming was second only to movies in popularity.<a name="FNanchor_66" +id="FNanchor_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_66" class="fnanchor">[66]</a> +Although the number of swimmers was increasing, +competition caused the swim suit industry to take +a new approach. Manufacturers attempted to increase +the volume of sales through advertising by emphasizing +style. In 1927 one company advertised a national +appeal to woman’s vanity by declaring that beach +<i>uniforms</i> were out and that beach <i>styles</i> were in.</p> + +<p>It was a general characteristic of the 1930s that +swimming suits covered less of the bather. The +attached trunks of the swimming suit no longer +extended down the leg but it survived unseen beneath +the vestigial remains of a skirt.</p> + +<p>The diminishing coverage of the swim suit was also +related to a changing attitude toward sun exposure. +For years women had protected their delicate skin +to prevent any unladylike, healthy appearance. The +barrier against a lady having a tan deteriorated as +women became accepted into athletic activities. +By 1930, women eagerly sought a sun tan. Not +only were there lotions to help the neophyte sun-worshiper +acquire a rich even tan, but creams were +available for the impatient who wished an instant +tan. In line with this trend, swim suit manufacturers +and sellers promoted and sold low sun-back or +California styles, halter necks, and cut-out sections +that exposed various portions of the midriff. The +favorite suit, however, was the form-fitting maillot +of wool jersey with no skirt.</p> + +<p>In the early 1930s, the textile trade journals +applauded the increasing stress on styling as a means +of encouraging the consumer to buy a new suit +rather than to use “last year’s.” Stylishness was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</a></span> +introduced into knitted suits through the use of a +greater range of solid colors. Parti-colored suits, +with stripes and slashes of a second or even a third +color, were also featured (<a href="#Fig18">fig. 18</a>). Knitting mills +were pressed to introduce novelty effects such as +mesh, waffle motifs, and lace patterns in knitted +fabrics.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"><a name="Fig18" id="Fig18"></a> +<img src="images/illo65.jpg" alt="Ten Woolen Knitted Swimming Suits" width="500" height="285" /> +<p class="caption">Figure 18. <span class="smcap">One-piece swimming suits of knitted wool</span>, 1930. +(<i>Courtesy of Cole of California.</i>)</p></div> + +<p>The insistent emphasis on novelty encouraged the +development of such items as all-rubber swimming +suits with embossed surfaces simulating knitted textiles. +Although this innovation was not successful, +because the suits were clammy and easily torn, rubber +did find a definite use in swimming suits with the +introduction of Lastex—a yarn made with a core of +rubber wrapped by a fine thread of another fiber. +The following advertisement for swimming suits made +with Lastex best explains why this important innovation +is still valued by the industry today:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>There’s no wrinkle, no bag, no sag, even under the most +ruthless sun! No other human device can even approximate +that utter freedom, that perfection of fit, at rest or +in motion, that airy but strictly legal sense of wearing +nothing at all. There is no substitute for this elastic yarn, +which imparts lasting elasticity to any fabric.<a name="FNanchor_67" +id="FNanchor_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67" class="fnanchor">[67]</a></p></div> + +<p>Having exhausted the novelty effects of knitted +swim suits, women in the late 1930s began to respond +eagerly to the wide range of decorative possibilities +found in woven fabrics. Cotton and the relatively new +man-made fibers such as Celanese acetate and Dupont +rayon were used in fabrics such as ginghams, chambrays, +piques, and featherweight elastic satins. To the +pleasure of the fashion editors, who claimed to be +anxious for some relief from the nudity of the maillot, +suits of woven fabrics were made with flared skirts. +These had knitted linings of cotton, acetate, or wool +which satisfied any taste as to warmth or coolness on +the beach. The belief was prevalent that a wool +swimming suit was needed for warmth. In the 1940s +the two-piece, bare-midriff suit with tight shorts or +flared skirt was a popular and logical development +from the earlier suits with cut-out sections around the +midriff. The more extreme French bikini, however, +was not adopted by American women when it was +first introduced in the 1940s.</p> + +<p>By the end of the forties the one-piece swimming suit +staged a comeback with a slight variation: the new +suits were structurally sculptured to mold, control, +and stay put while swimming or sunning. They were<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</a></span> +the product of ingenious engineering, inside and out. +The use of shirring and skillful cutting and handling of +fabric focused attention on the bust line, while the +frequent use of Lastex tended to streamline the hips +like a girdle. Inside, the careful use of wire and plastic +boning permitted many of these suits to assume a +shape of their own and even to be worn without +straps.</p> + +<p>A short-lived revival of the covered-up look appeared +in the fashion pages in 1954 but, unlike the +suits with covered arms and neck of the previous +century, these suits drew attention to the parts of +the body that were covered. The fate of this unsuccessful +novelty is a good illustration of the fact +that, ultimately, the buyer has the final word in the +volatile field of feminine fashion. The swim suit +manufacturers apparently misinterpreted the American +woman’s readiness to discard the more revealing +two-piece suit in favor of an altered form of the +maillot. Always ready with novelties to make last +year’s suit obsolete, the manufacturers tried to encourage +women into a more extreme covered-up +look. Despite the power of national advertising women +were unwilling to go back in time. The female beach-goer +and sun-worshiper opposed a suit that might +interfere with the tanning process.</p> + +<p>By 1960, the production of swim suits had become +a big business with mass distribution and mass markets. +Expanded world-wide transportation facilities +and increased leisure and affluence in the United +States created a demand for midwinter vacation +clothing for use in warmer climates, and the manufacturing +of swim suits became a year-round undertaking, +producing 14,728 million knitted and woven +suits in women’s, misses, and junior sizes in 1960.<a name="FNanchor_68" +id="FNanchor_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_68" class="fnanchor">[68]</a></p> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<h2>Conclusions</h2> + +<p>The earliest bathing dress for women in the United +States may have been an old smock or shift, followed +by a bathing gown based on the shift or chemise. +Although women’s bathing and swimming costume +achieved an identity of its own during the 19th +century, the evolution of this garb followed certain +innovations in women’s underclothing, namely, +drawers in the first half of the 19th century, the +“combination” of the late 1870s, and the brassiere +and panties of the 1930s. The greatest number of +minor style changes, however, were direct reflections +of fashions in street dress. The rising hemline and, +at times, the discarding of a skirt during periods +when women wore long dresses for other activities +can be attributed to changes caused by the functional +requirements of bathing and swimming; the +shortening of sleeves and trousers in the last quarter +of the 19th century were also functional improvements. +The benefits of the shorter trousers, however, +were minimized when modesty required women to +cover their exposed legs with stockings.</p> + +<p>Swimming suits have been considered a 20th +century innovation; in fact one corporation is under +the impression that a member of their staff was +responsible for the first use of the term “swimming +suit” early in the century. The findings presented +in this paper show that some women were wearing +“swimming suits” that were distinctly different +from bathing dresses as early as the 1870s and that both +co-existed for some 50 years. Bathing dresses disappeared +in the 1920s with the widespread acceptance +of its functional counterpart; “bathing suit” no +longer referred to a special type of costume but became +interchangeable with the term “swimming suit.”</p> + +<p>The insistent trend toward more functional costume +reached its ultimate conclusion with the refinements +of the knitted swimming suit in the 1930s. Subsequent +changes have not improved upon the functional +design of this classic suit. In many instances these +variations have been merely to satisfy the feminine +desire for distinctive apparel and the industry’s +need for perishable fashions. Female competitive +swimmers have continued to wear the simple knitted +suit—now of nylon rather than wool.</p> + +<p>The changes since the 1930s have shown a trend +toward diminution in the coverage of the swimming +suit. One cannot be certain what this means for the +future, but it is unlikely that either the swim suit +industry or standards of modesty of the near future +will permit a total elimination of swimming costume. +We can be assured, however, that so long as women +swim, they will not repeat history by swathing themselves +with yards of fabric.</p> + +<hr class="c25" /> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_1" id="Footnote_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Foster Rhea Dulles</span>, <i>America Learns to Play, 1607-1940</i> +(New York: D. Appleton-Century Company, 1940), p. 363.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_2" id="Footnote_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> +The author is indebted to Mrs. Anne W. Murray, formerly +Curator in Charge of American Costume, Smithsonian Institution, +for the interest she has shown throughout the research +and writing of this paper. The difficulties of this work would +have been greatly compounded without the benefit of her +experience and encouragement.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_3" id="Footnote_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Ralph Thomas</span>, <i>Swimming</i> (London: Sampson Low, +Marsten & Company Limited, 1904), p. 15.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_4" id="Footnote_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Joseph Strutt</span>, <i>The Sports and Pastimes of the People of +England</i> (London: Chatto and Windus, 1876), pp. 151-152.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_5" id="Footnote_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Sir Thomas Elyot</span>, <i>The Boke Named the Governour</i> (London, +1557), vol. 1, pp. 54-55.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_6" id="Footnote_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Thomas</span>, op. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_3">footnote 3</a>), p. 172.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_7" id="Footnote_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Melchisédesh Thévenot</span>, <i>The Art of Swimming</i> (London: +John Lever, 1789), pp. 4-5.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_8" id="Footnote_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Thomas</span>, op. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_3">footnote 3</a>), p. 161.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_9" id="Footnote_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Celia Fiennes</span>, <i>Through England on Horseback</i>, as quoted in <span class="smcap">Iris Brooke</span> and +<span class="smcap">James Laver</span>, <i>English Costume from the Fourteenth through the Nineteenth Century</i> (New York: The Macmillan +Company, 1937), p. 252.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_10" id="Footnote_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">George Washington</span>, <i>The Writings of George Washington</i>, +John C. Fitzpatrick, ed. (Washington: United States Congress, +1931), vol. 1, p. 8.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_11" id="Footnote_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">John J. Moorman</span>, <i>The Virginia Springs</i> (Richmond: J. W. +Randolph, 1854), pp. 259-260.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_12" id="Footnote_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Ibid., p. 264.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_13" id="Footnote_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Henry Wansay</span>, <i>An Excursion to the United States</i> (Salisbury: +J. Easton, 1798), p. 211, as quoted in <span class="smcap">Dulles</span>, <i>America Learns +to Play</i>, p. 152.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_14" id="Footnote_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Fred Allan Wilson</span>, <i>Some Annals of Nahant</i> (Boston: Old +Corner Book Store, 1928), p. 77, as quoted in +<span class="smcap">Dulles</span>, <i>America Learns to Play</i>, p. 152.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_15" id="Footnote_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> +<i>New York Evening Post</i> (June 4, 1813).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_16" id="Footnote_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">James Stuart</span>, <i>Three Years in North America</i> (Edinburgh: +Robert Cadwell, 1833), vol. 1, p. 441.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_17" id="Footnote_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> +J. W. and N. <span class="smcap">Orr</span>, <i>Orr’s Book of Swimming</i> (New York: +Burns and Baner, 1846) as quoted in <span class="smcap">Thomas</span>, op. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_3">footnote +3</a>), p. 270.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_18" id="Footnote_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> +“Life at Watering-Places—Our Newport Correspondent,” +<i>Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper</i> (August 29, 1857), vol. +4, no. 91, p. 197.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_19" id="Footnote_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> +“Chit-Chat upon Philadelphia Fashions for August,” +<i>Godey’s Lady’s Book</i> (August 1848), vol. 37, p. 119.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_20" id="Footnote_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> +“My First Day at Cape May,” <i>Peterson’s Magazine</i> (August +1856), vol. 30, no. 2, p. 91.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_21" id="Footnote_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> +<i>Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper</i> (July 26, 1856), vol. 2, +no. 33, p. 102.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_22" id="Footnote_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> +“Summer Recreation,” <i>Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper</i> +(June 18, 1870), vol. 30, no. 768, p. 210.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_23" id="Footnote_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Jared Sparks</span>, <i>The Works of Benjamin Franklin</i> (Boston: +Tappan and Whittemore, 1844), vol. I, pp. 63-64.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_24" id="Footnote_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">J. Frost</span>, <i>The Art of Swimming</i> (New York: P. W. Gallaudet, +1818), p. 57.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_25" id="Footnote_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> +<i>Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper</i> (August 25, 1866), +vol. 22, no. 569, p. 355.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_26" id="Footnote_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> +Ibid. (July 29, 1871), vol. 32, no. 826, p. 322.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_27" id="Footnote_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> +<i>Diary of John Crosier</i>, 1782, as quoted in +<span class="smcap">C. Willett</span> and +<span class="smcap">Phillis Cunnington</span>, <i>Handbook of English Costume in the Eighteenth +Century</i> (London: Faber and Faber, 1957), p. 404.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_28" id="Footnote_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> +Loc. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_19">footnote 19</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_29" id="Footnote_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">A Lady</span>, <i>The Workwoman’s Guide</i> (London: Simpkin, +Marshall, and Co., 1840), p. 61.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_30" id="Footnote_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> +Loc. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_29">footnote 29</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_31" id="Footnote_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> +Loc. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_29">footnote 29</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_32" id="Footnote_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> Ibid., p. 68.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_33" id="Footnote_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> +As quoted in <span class="smcap">C. Willett</span> and +<span class="smcap">Phillis Cunnington</span>, <i>The +History of Underclothes</i> (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), p. 130.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_34" id="Footnote_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> +“Cape May,” <i>Godey’s Lady’s Book</i> (December 1845), vol. +31, p. 268.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_35" id="Footnote_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> +“Fashions for August, Bathing Dresses,” <i>Peterson’s Magazine</i> +(August 1856), vol. 30, p. 145.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_36" id="Footnote_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> +“New York Fashions,” <i>Harper’s Bazar</i> (August 8, 1868), vol. +1, no. 41, p. 643.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_37" id="Footnote_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> +Ibid. (July 10, 1869), vol. 2, no. 28, p. 435.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_38" id="Footnote_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">B. Brooke</span>, “Bathing-dress with Hat and Gloves,” <i>Hobbies</i> +(August 1958), vol. 63, p. 90.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_39" id="Footnote_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> +Photograph and pattern appears in Blanch Payne, <i>History +of Costume</i> (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), pp. 518, +583-584.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_40" id="Footnote_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> +“An Excursion to Long Branch,” <i>Frank Leslie’s Illustrated +Newspaper</i> (August 22, 1857), vol. 4, no. 90, p. 182.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_41" id="Footnote_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> +Loc. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_18">footnote 18</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_42" id="Footnote_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> +“New York Fashions,” <i>Harper’s Bazar</i> (July 19, 1873), +vol. 6, no. 29, p. 451.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_43" id="Footnote_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> +The term “bathing suit” as opposed to “bathing dress” +came into use in the last quarter of the 19th century when the +bifurcated bathing garment with a shorter skirt was widely +accepted. The two terms, however, continued to be used interchangeably, +with “bathing dress” appearing less frequently.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_44" id="Footnote_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> +“New York Fashions,” <i>Harper’s Bazar</i> (July 4, 1885), +vol. 18, no. 27, p. 427.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_45" id="Footnote_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> +Ibid. (July 5, 1890), vol. 23, no. 27, p. 523.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_46" id="Footnote_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> +Ibid. (June 13, 1896), vol. 29, no. 24, p. 503.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_47" id="Footnote_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> +Ibid. (July 1910), vol. 43, no. 7, p. 552.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_48" id="Footnote_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> +“New York Fashions,” <i>Harper’s Bazar</i> (July 10, 1869), vol. +2, no. 28, p. 435.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_49" id="Footnote_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> +Ibid. (July 13, 1872), vol. 5, no. 28, p. 459.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_50" id="Footnote_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> +Ibid. (July 25, 1874), vol. 7, no. 30, p. 475.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_51" id="Footnote_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> As quoted in +<span class="smcap">C. Willett Cunnington</span>, <i>English Women’s +Clothing in the 19th Century</i> (New York: Thomas Yoseloff, 1958), +p. 225.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_52" id="Footnote_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52"><span class="label">[52]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">J. Parmly Paret</span>, <i>The Woman’s Book of Sports</i> (New York: +D. Appleton & Co., 1901), p. 74.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_53" id="Footnote_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53"><span class="label">[53]</span></a> +Telephone interview with Adeline Trapp Mulhenberg, +May 1966.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_54" id="Footnote_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54"><span class="label">[54]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Annette Kellerman</span>, <i>How to Swim</i> (New York: George H. +Doran Company, 1918), p. 47.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_55" id="Footnote_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55"><span class="label">[55]</span></a> +<i>Vogue</i> (June 1, 1917), vol. 49, no. 11, p. 85.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_56" id="Footnote_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56"><span class="label">[56]</span></a> +Ibid. (June 15, 1917), vol. 49, no. 12, p. 67.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_57" id="Footnote_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57"><span class="label">[57]</span></a> +“For the Modern Mermaid,” <i>Delineator</i> (June 1916), +vol. 38, no. 6, p. 52.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_58" id="Footnote_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58"><span class="label">[58]</span></a> +Loc. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_54">footnote 54</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_59" id="Footnote_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59"><span class="label">[59]</span></a> +<i>Harper’s Bazar</i> (June 1920), vol. 55, no. 6, p. 138.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_60" id="Footnote_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60"><span class="label">[60]</span></a> +Ibid. (June 1921), 54th year, no. 2504, p. 101.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_61" id="Footnote_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61"><span class="label">[61]</span></a> +“Bathing Regulations for City Beaches,” <i>American City</i> +(May 1917), vol. 16, no. 5, p. 537.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_62" id="Footnote_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62"><span class="label">[62]</span></a> +Loc. cit. (<a href="#Footnote_61">footnote 61</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_63" id="Footnote_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63"><span class="label">[63]</span></a> +<span class="smcap">Jane Pride</span>, “Pick-up,” <i>Delineator</i> (May 1927), vol. 110, +no. 5, p. 15.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_64" id="Footnote_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64"><span class="label">[64]</span></a> +<i>Harper’s Bazar</i> (June 1923), 56th year, no. 2528, p. 5.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_65" id="Footnote_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65"><span class="label">[65]</span></a> +<i>Delineator</i> (June 1923), vol. 102, no. 6, p. 95.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_66" id="Footnote_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66"><span class="label">[66]</span></a> +<i>The Leisure Hours of 5,000 People; a Report of a Study of +Leisure Time Activities and Desires</i> (New York, National Recreation +Assoc., 1934).</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_67" id="Footnote_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67"><span class="label">[67]</span></a> +<i>Harper’s Bazaar</i> (June 1934), 68th year, no. 2660, p. 9.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_68" id="Footnote_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68"><span class="label">[68]</span></a> +Compiled from “Production of Selected Items of Knit +Outerwear and Swimwear; 1960-1961,” <i>Apparel Survey 1961</i> +(1962), series M23A(61)-2, p. 14.</p> + +</div> + +<hr class="c25" /> + +<p class="right fsize80" style="margin: 3em 10% 3em auto;">U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1969</p> + +<hr class="c25" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/coverr.jpg" alt="Rear Cover" width="400" height="517" /></div> + +<hr class="c25" /> + +<div class="tnbox"><a name="TN" id="TN"></a> + +<h2 style="font-size: 1em;">Transcriber's notes:</h2> + +<p>The original language has been maintained, including inconsistencies in spelling and hyphenation, except as mentioned below.</p> + +<p>Changes made to the original text: <i>chemise type</i> changed to <i>chemise-type</i> as elsewhere; page 17: closing square bracket +deleted after <i>what an array</i>; page 65: quote mark inserted before footnote anchor <i>[65]</i>.</p> + +<p>Footnotes have been moved to the end of the document; illustrations have been moved to +where they fit best in the text.</p> + +</div> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume +in the United States, by Claudia B. Kidwell + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING *** + +***** This file should be named 37586-h.htm or 37586-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/5/8/37586/ + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Harry Lamé and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/37586-h/images/coverf.jpg b/37586-h/images/coverf.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..32424f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/coverf.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/coverr.jpg b/37586-h/images/coverr.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1c98be9 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/coverr.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo01.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo01.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4b3eae1 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo01.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo14.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo14.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..66e3425 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo14.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo18.png b/37586-h/images/illo18.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b416eea --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo18.png diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo19.png b/37586-h/images/illo19.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a74cbab --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo19.png diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo22.png b/37586-h/images/illo22.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..873cd6c --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo22.png diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo30.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo30.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..024f853 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo30.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo33.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo33.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..18c37e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo33.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo37.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo37.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e6abeee --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo37.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo40.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo40.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7910c72 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo40.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo42.png b/37586-h/images/illo42.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7ae7ad4 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo42.png diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo43.png b/37586-h/images/illo43.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b46456c --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo43.png diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo44.png b/37586-h/images/illo44.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..eb28323 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo44.png diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo49.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo49.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8e53a82 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo49.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo53.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo53.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..64ae667 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo53.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo57.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo57.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0074213 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo57.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo59.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo59.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f2cb923 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo59.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo62.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo62.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..409b61e --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo62.jpg diff --git a/37586-h/images/illo65.jpg b/37586-h/images/illo65.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4b72d90 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586-h/images/illo65.jpg diff --git a/37586.txt b/37586.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..72a7b25 --- /dev/null +++ b/37586.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2569 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the +United States, by Claudia B. Kidwell + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the United States + +Author: Claudia B. Kidwell + +Release Date: October 1, 2011 [EBook #37586] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING *** + + + + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Harry Lame and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + + + + + +------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | | + | TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES: | + | | + | The original language has been maintained, including inconsisten-| + | cies in spelling and hyphenation, except as mentioned below. | + | | + | Changes made to the original text: 'chemise type' changed to | + | 'chemise-type' as elsewhere; page 17: closing square bracket | + | deleted after 'what an array'; page 65: quote mark inserted | + | before footnote anchor [65]. | + | | + | Footnotes have been moved to directly underneath the paragraph | + | or section they refer to. | + | | + | Texts printed in italics in the original publication have been | + | transcribed between underscores, as in _text_; bold-face text is | + | represented here between equal signs, as in =text=. Small | + | capitals in the original are transcribed as ALL CAPITALS. | + | | + +------------------------------------------------------------------+ + + + + +UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 250 + +CONTRIBUTIONS FROM + +THE MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGY + +PAPER 64 + + +WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING COSTUME +IN THE UNITED STATES + + +_Claudia B. Kidwell_ + + + + + INTRODUCTION 3 + CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT 6 + BATHING COSTUME 14 + SWIMMING COSTUME 24 + CONCLUSIONS 32 + + +SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS + +CITY OF WASHINGTON + +1968 + + +For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing +Office Washington, D.C. 20402--Price 50 cents (paper cover) + +[Illustration: Figure 1.--BATHING COSTUME, from _The Delineator_, July +1884. (Smithsonian photo 58466.)] + + + + +_Claudia B. Kidwell_ + + +_Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume in the United States_ + + + _The evolution of the modern swim suit from an unflattering, + restrictive bathing dress into an attractive, functional costume + is traced from colonial times to the present. This evolution in + style reflects not only the increasing involvement of women in + aquatic activities but also the changing motivations for + feminine participation. The nature of the style changes in + aquatic dress were influenced by the fashions of the period, + while functional improvements were limited by prevailing + standards of modesty. This mutation of the bathing dress to the + swim suit demonstrates the changing attitudes and status of + women in the United States, from the traditional image of the + subordinate "weaker sex" to an equal and active member of the + society._ + + THE AUTHOR: _Claudia B. Kidwell is assistant curator of American + costume, department of civil history, in the Smithsonian + Institution's Museum of History and Technology._ + + + + +Introduction + + +Women's bathing dress holds a unique place in the history of American +costume. This specialized garb predates the age of sports costume which +arrived during the last half of the 19th century. Although bathing dress +shares this distinction with riding costume, the aquatic garb was merely +utilitarian in the late 18th century while riding costume had a +fashionable role. From its modest status, bathing gowns and later +bathing dresses became more important until their successor, the +swimming suit, achieved a permanent place among the outfits worn by 20th +century women. The social significance of this accomplishment was best +expressed by Foster Rhea Dulles, author of _America Learns to Play_, in +1940, when he wrote: + + The modern bathing-suit ... symbolized the new status of women + even more than the short skirts and bobbed hair of the jazz age + or the athleticism of the devotees of tennis and golf. It was + the final proof of their successful assertion of the right to + enjoy whatever recreation they chose, costumed according to the + demands of the sport rather than the tabus of an outworn + prudery, and to enjoy it in free and natural association with + men.[1] + + [1] FOSTER RHEA DULLES, _America Learns to Play, 1607-1940_ (New York: + D. Appleton-Century Company, 1940), p. 363. + +Since the prescribed limitations of women's role in any given period are +determined and affected by many social factors, the evolution of the +bathing gown to the swimming suit may not only be dependent upon the +changes in the American woman's way of life, but also may reflect +certain technological and sociological factors that are not readily +identifiable. The purpose of this paper is to describe the changes in +women's bathing dress and wherever pertinent to present the factors +affecting these styles.[2] + + [2] The author is indebted to Mrs. Anne W. Murray, formerly Curator + in Charge of American Costume, Smithsonian Institution, for the + interest she has shown throughout the research and writing of + this paper. The difficulties of this work would have been + greatly compounded without the benefit of her experience and + encouragement. + +Anyone who attempts to research the topic of swimming and related +subjects will be confronted with a history of varying reactions. Ralph +Thomas, in 1904, described his experiences through the years that he +spent compiling a book on swimming: + + When asked what I was doing, I have felt the greatest reluctance + to say a work on the literature of swimming. People who were + writing novels or some other thing of little practical utility + always looked at me with a smile of pity on my mentioning + swimming. Though I am bound to say that, when I gave them some + idea of the work, the pity changed somewhat but then they would + say "Why don't you give us a new edition of your Handbook of + Fictitious Names?" As if the knowledge of the real name of an + author was of any importance in comparison with the discussion + of a subject that more or less concerns every human being.[3] + + [3] RALPH THOMAS, _Swimming_ (London: Sampson Low, Marsten & Company + Limited, 1904), p. 15. + +Such reactions toward research about swimming probably discouraged many +serious efforts of writing about the subject. Its scant coverage and +even omission in histories of recreation or sports may be explained by +the fact that swimming cannot be categorized as simply physical +exercise, skill, recreation, or competitive sport. In trying to +determine the extent to which women swam in times past it is frustrating +to observe the historians' masculine bias in researching and reporting +social history. + +A study of women's bathing dress meets with similar problems, and while +a discussion of bathing dress can evoke considerable interest, its +nature is usually considered more superficial than serious. Descriptions +of, and even brief references to, bathing apparel for women are very +scarce before the third quarter of the 19th century. Before this time +only decorative costume items were considered worthy of description and +bathing costume was not in this category. It is only within +comparatively recent times that costume historians have conceded +sufficient importance to bathing dress to include meaningful +descriptions in their research. + +Participation in water activities was widespread in the ancient world +although the earliest origins of this activity are unknown. For example, +in Greece and, later, in Rome, swimming was valued as a pleasurable +exercise and superb physical training for warriors. The more sedentary +citizens turned to the baths which became the gathering point for +professional men, philosophers, and students. Thus bathing and swimming, +combined originally to fulfill the functions of cleansing and exercise +purely for physical well being, developed the secondary functions of +recreation and social intercourse. + +With the rise of the Christian church and its spreading anti-pagan +attitudes, many of the sumptuous baths were destroyed. Christian +asceticism also may have contributed to the decline of bathing for +cleansing. In addition there was a secular belief that outdoor bathing +helped to spread the fearful epidemics that periodically swept the +continent. Although there is isolated evidence that swimming was valued +as a physical skill,[4] swimming and bathing all but disappeared during +the Middle Ages. + + [4] JOSEPH STRUTT, _The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England_ + (London: Chatto and Windus, 1876), pp. 151-152. + +In 1531, long after the Middle Ages, Sir Thomas Elyot wrote of swimming +that + + There is an exercise, whyche is right profitable in extreme + danger of warres, but ... it hathe not ben of longe tyme muche + used, specially amoge noble men, perchaunce some reders whl + lyttell esteeme it.[5] + + [5] SIR THOMAS ELYOT, _The Boke Named the Governour_ (London, 1557), + vol. 1, pp. 54-55. + +This early English writer gave no instructions, but expounded on the +value of swimming as a skill that could be useful in time of war. + +It herewith becomes necessary to differentiate between bathing and +swimming with their attendant goals, for it was the goals of each +activity which influenced the associated customs and costume designs. +For this discussion we shall define bathing as the act of immersing all +or part of the body in water for cleansing, therapeutic, recreational, +or religious purposes, and swimming as the self-propulsion of the body +through water. When we refer to swimming it is necessary to distinguish +whether it was considered a useful skill, a therapeutic exercise, a +recreation, or a competitive sport. Thus it is important to note that +while bathing for all purposes and swimming as a physical exercise, +recreation, and sport died out during the Middle Ages, the latter +continued to be valued as a skill, particularly for warriors. This +function of swimming survived to form the link between the ancients and +the 17th century. + +According to Ralph Thomas, the first book on swimming was written by +Nicolas Winmann, a professor of languages at Ingolstadt in Bavaria, and +printed in 1528. The first book published in England on swimming was +written in Latin by Everard Digby and printed in 1587. As Thomas has +stated, Digby's book + + ... is entitled to a far more important place than the first of + the world, because, whereas Winmann had never (up to 1866) been + translated or copied or even quoted by any one, Digby has been + three times translated; twice into English and once into French + and through this latter became and probably still is the best + known treatise on the subject.[6] + + [6] THOMAS, op. cit. (footnote 3), p. 172. + +This French version was first published in 1696 with its purported +author being Monsieur Melchisedesh Thevenot. In his introduction +Thevenot indicates that he has made use of Digby's book in his own +treatise and that he knows of Winmann's publication. The English +translation of Thevenot's version became the standard instruction book +for English-speaking peoples. Typically, his reasons in favor of men +swimming were based on its being a useful skill (i.e., to keep from +being drowned in a shipwreck, to escape capture when being pursued by +enemies, and to attack an enemy posted on the opposite side of a +river).[7] + + [7] MELCHISEDESH THEVENOT, _The Art of Swimming_ (London: John Lever, + 1789), pp. 4-5. + +In the 18th and 19th centuries numerous other publications on swimming +appeared--too numerous to deal with in this paper. Nevertheless, the +refinement of the art of swimming was not related to the number of +instruction books. Few of these books actually offered new insights in +comparison with those that were outright plagiarisms or filled with +misinformation. In the meantime, bathing was reintroduced and as this +activity became more widespread swimming was regarded as more than a +useful skill, but only for men. + +There is little evidence of women bathing or swimming prior to the 17th +century; these activities seem to have been exclusively for men. +Nevertheless, Thomas refers to Winmann as writing, in 1538, that + + at Zurich in his day (thus implying that he was an elderly man + and that the custom had ceased) the young men and maidens bathed + together around the statue of "Saint Nicolai." Even in those + days his pupil asks "were not the girls ashamed of being naked?" + "No, as they wore bathing drawers--sometimes a marriage was + brought about." If any young man failed to bring up stones from + the bottom, when he dived, he had to suffer the penalty of + wearing drawers like the girls.[8] + + [8] THOMAS, op. cit. (footnote 3), p. 161. + +Thomas goes on to say that the only evidence he had found of women +swimming in England in early days was in a ballad entitled "The Swimming +Lady" and dating from about 1670. Despite these isolated references it +was not until the 19th century that women were encouraged to swim. + +After its decline in the Middle Ages, bathing achieved new popularity as +a medicinal treatment for both men and women. In England this revival +occurred in the 17th century when certain medical men held that bathing +in fresh water had healing properties. The resultant spas, which were +developed at freshwater springs to effect such "cures," expanded rapidly +as the number of their devotees increased. By the mid-18th century, +rival practitioners claimed even greater health-giving properties for +sea water both as a drink and for bathing. An economic benefit resulted +when, tiny, poverty-stricken fishing hamlets became famous through the +patronage of the wealthy in search of health as well as pleasure. + +When the early colonists left England in the first half of the 17th +century, the beliefs and practices they had acquired in their original +homes were brought to the new world. Thus, it is important to note that +during this period in Europe, swimming was a skill practiced by few, +primarily soldiers and sailors. It was not until the second half of the +century that bathing for therapeutic purposes was becoming popular in +the old world. + +The earliest reference to women's bathing costume has been quoted +previously in Winmann's amazing description of mixed bathing at Zurich. +He referred to women, wearing only drawers, bathing with men as a custom +no longer practiced when he wrote his book in 1538. + +One of the earliest illustrations of bathing costume I have located is +part of a painted fan leaf, about 1675, that was reproduced in volume 9 +of Maurice Leloir's _Histoire du Costume de l'Antiquite_ in 1914. In one +corner of this painting, which depicts a variety of activities going on +in the Seine and on the river banks at Paris, women are shown immersing +themselves in water within a covered wooden frame. They are wearing +loose, light-colored gowns and long headdresses. An English source of +the late 17th century described a very similar costume. + + The ladye goes into the bath with garments made of yellow + canvas, which is stiff and made large with great sleeves like a + parson's gown. The water fills it up so that it's borne off that + your shape is not seen, it does not cling close as other + lining.[9] + + [9] CELIA FIENNES, _Through England on Horseback_, as quoted in IRIS + BROOKE and JAMES LAVER, _English Costume from the Fourteenth + through the Nineteenth Century_ (New York: The Macmillan Company, + 1937), p. 252. + +In the course of my contacts with other costume historians I have +encountered the belief that women did not wear any bathing costume +before the mid-19th century. Supporting this theory I have seen a +reproduction of a print, about 1812, showing women bathing nude in the +ocean at Margate, England, but the evidence already presented indicates +clearly that costume was worn earlier. Also certain English secondary +sources refer to a nondescript chemise-type of bathing dress that was +worn during the first quarter of the 19th century. Because little study +has been given European bathing costume, it is not possible to +conjecture under what circumstances costume was or was not used. We do +know, however, that when bathing became popular in the new world bathing +gowns were worn by some women in the old. + + + + +Cultural Environment + + +As many European cultural traits were transmitted to the new world via +England, so was the introduction of water activities. Nevertheless it +required a number of years for such cultural refinements as bathing to +take root in the new environment. The early colonists brought with them +a limited knowledge of swimming, but they did not have the leisure to +cultivate this skill. In New England the Puritan religious and social +beliefs were as restrictive as the lack of leisure time. In this harsh +climate, self-indulgence in swimming and bathing did not fulfill the +requirements of being righteous and useful. Thus the growing popularity +of bathing among the wealthy in Europe during the 17th and early 18th +centuries had little initial impact in the new world. + +Although swimming as a skill predated the introduction of bathing to the +new world, I will first discuss bathing since the customs and facilities +established for it reveal the development of swimming in America, first +for men and then for women. + + +BATHING + +One of the earliest sources showing an appreciation of mineral waters +for bathing in the new world is a 1748 reference in George Washington's +diary to the "fam'd Warm Springs."[10] At that time only open ground +surrounded the springs which were located within a dense forest. + + [10] GEORGE WASHINGTON, _The Writings of George Washington_, John C. + Fitzpatrick, ed. (Washington: United States Congress, 1931), vol. + 1, p. 8. + +Another entry for July 31, 1769, records his departure with Mrs. +Washington for these springs (now known as Berkeley Springs, West +Virginia) where they stayed more than a month. They were accompanied by +her daughter, Patsy Custis, who was probably taken in hope of curing a +form of epilepsy with which she was afflicted. In the latter part of the +18th century hundreds of visitors annually flocked to these springs. +Although the accommodations were primitive, we early note that the +avowed therapeutic aims for visiting these waters were very quickly +combined with a growing social life on dry land. + + Rude log huts, board and canvas tents, and even covered wagons, + served as lodging rooms, while every party brought its own + substantial provisions of flour, meat and bacon, depending for + lighter articles of diet on the "Hill folk," or the success of + their own foragers. A large hollow scooped in the sand, + surrounded by a screen of pine brush, was the only + bathing-house; and this was used alternately by ladies and + gentlemen. The time set apart for the ladies was announced by a + blast on a long tin horn, at which signal all of the opposite + sex retired to a prescribed distance, ... Here day and night + passed in a round of eating and drinking, bathing, fiddling, + dancing, and reveling. Gaming was carried to a great excess and + horse-racing was a daily amusement.[11] + + [11] JOHN J. MOORMAN, _The Virginia Springs_ (Richmond: J. W. + Randolph, 1854), pp. 259-260. + +The more permanent bath houses found at the increasing number of springs +in the early 19th century were really only shanties built where the +water bubbled up. Nevertheless, as civilization moved in upon these +resorts, the current taboos and mores were soon imposed. These gave rise +to customs, facilities, and inventions peculiar to the pastime. The more +permanent facilities carefully separated men from women. Frequently the +women's bath was located a considerable distance from the men's and +surrounded by a high fence. Female attendants were at hand to wait upon +the ladies, and private rooms were prepared for their use both before +and after bathing. + +In the early 19th century the fame of Berkeley Springs was eclipsed +temporarily by the growing popularity of other springs, such as Saratoga +in the north and White Sulphur Springs in the south. The newest +facilities, however, and the completion of the Baltimore and Ohio +Railroad, restored Berkeley to its former prosperity in the early 1850s. + +The bath houses at Berkeley Springs in the 1850s are an example of the +facilities that were considered convenient, extensive, and elegant +during this period. The gentlemen's bath house contained fourteen +dressing rooms and ten large bathing rooms. In addition to the plunge +baths, which were twelve feet long, five feet wide, and four and a half +feet deep, the men had a swimming bath that was sixty feet long, twenty +feet wide, and five feet deep. The ladies' and men's bath houses were +located on opposite sides of the grove. As if this were not reassuring +enough, we are told that the building for the weaker sex was surrounded +by several acres of trees. Thus protected, feminine bathers could choose +either one of the nine private baths or the plunge bath, which was +thirty feet long by sixteen feet wide and four and a half feet deep, as +well as use a shower or artificial warm baths.[12] + + [12] Ibid., p. 264. + +The differences between the two bath houses show that women were not as +active in the water as the men. Judging from the kind of facilities that +were provided at Berkeley Springs, the ladies did less "plunging" than +the men and no swimming. + +Although accepted in England, bathing in =salt= water did not become +popular in the new world until some time after bathing at springs was +established. + +In 1794 a Mr. Bailey announced that he planned to institute "bathing +machines and several species of entertainment" at his resort on Long +Island.[13] "A machine of peculiar construction for bathing in the open +sea" was advertised a few years later by a hotel proprietor at Nahant, +Massachusetts.[14] There is some question as to what the term "bathing +machine" describes. Existing records show that W. Merritt of New York +City received a patent dated February 1, 1814, for a "bathing machine." +Unfortunately neither a description nor a drawing can be found today. +European patents from the first half of the 19th century reveal that a +bathing machine could be a contraption in which an individual bathed in +privacy. This is what the above quotations seem to be describing. In +general usage, however, "bathing machine" could also have been a device +in which an individual removed his clothing to prepare for bathing; this +type will be described later. + + [13] HENRY WANSAY, _An Excursion to the United States_ (Salisbury: J. + Easton, 1798), p. 211, as quoted in DULLES, _America Learns to + Play_, p. 152. + + [14] FRED ALLAN WILSON, _Some Annals of Nahant_ (Boston: Old Corner + Book Store, 1928), p. 77, as quoted in DULLES, _America Learns to + Play_, p. 152. + +By the early 19th century floating baths were established in every city +of any importance including Boston, Salem, Hartford, New York, +Philadelphia, Washington, Richmond, Charleston, and Savannah. One bath +located at the foot of Jay Street in New York City was described as +follows: + + The building is an octagon of seventy feet in diameter, with a + plank floor supported by logs so as to sink the center bath four + feet below the surface of the water, but in the private baths + the water may be reduced to three or even two feet so as to be + perfectly safe for children. It is placed in the current so + always to be supplied with ocean and pure water and rises and + falls with the tide.[15] + + [15] _New York Evening Post_ (June 4, 1813). + +As was true at the springs, men and women were segregated; but in the +floating baths they were only separated by being in different +compartments rather than in different bath houses. + +Although there were a number of these baths there were not enough to +cover all of the inviting river banks and sea shores. There are many +instances of men enjoying the water of undeveloped shores and there is +some evidence of women venturing into the bays and rivers (fig. 2). + +[Illustration: Figure 2.--"BATHING PARTY, 1810," painting by William P. +Chappel. + +(_Courtesy of Museum of the City of New York._)] + +Nevertheless, few women ventured into the open ocean during the early +19th century. They were generally afraid to brave the force of the ocean +waves with only a female companion, since prevailing attitudes regarding +the proper behavior of a lady prevented them from being accompanied by a +man. When a few ignored this dictate, their bold actions gave rise to +"ill-founded stories of want of delicacy on the part of the +females."[16] An unbiased traveler, who gave an account of this mixed +bathing in 1833, stated that parties always went into the water +completely dressed and for that reason he could see no great violation +of modesty. Mixed bathing at the seashore (fig. 3) was gaining +acceptance, however, when it was reported only thirteen years later that +"... ladies and gentlemen bathe in company, as is the fashion all along +the Atlantic Coast...."[17] + + [16] JAMES STUART, _Three Years in North America_ (Edinburgh: Robert + Cadwell, 1833), vol. 1, p. 441. + + [17] J. W. and N. ORR, _Orr's Book of Swimming_ (New York: Burns and + Baner, 1846) as quoted in THOMAS, op. cit. (footnote 3), p. 270. + +In place of the dressing rooms available in the floating baths, special +facilities were frequently provided. The bathing machine--in this case a +device in which one changed clothes--was used where there was a gentle +slope down to the water. This species of bathing machine was a small +wooden cabin set on very high wheels with steps leading down from a door +in the front. The bather entered and, while he was changing, the machine +was pulled into the sea by a horse. When water was well above the axles +the horse was uncoupled and taken ashore. The bather was then free to +enter the sea by descending the steps pointed away from the shore (fig. +4). Machines of the 18th and early 19th century were frequently equipped +with an awning which shielded the bather from public view as she or he +descended the steps to enter the water. These awnings were left off the +bathing machines during the last half of the 19th century. Such machines +were used to a great extent in Europe during the 18th and 19th +centuries. In the United States, however, they were used only to a +limited extent during the first half of the 19th century. By 1870 they +had practically disappeared--being replaced by the stationary, +sentry-box type of individual structure and the large communal bath +house. + +"Sentry-boxes" were used before the 1870s at beaches where the terrain +did not encourage the use of the bathing machines. At Long Branch, New +Jersey, and at one of the beaches at Newport, Rhode Island, lines of +these stationary structures were available to the bather for changing, +one half designated for women and the other half for men. Hours varied +but it was the practice to run up colored flags to signal bathing times +for the ladies and then the gentlemen. A male correspondent wrote from +Newport in 1857: + + If you are social and wish to bathe promiscuously, you put on a + dress and go in with the ladies, if you want to cultivate the + "fine and froggy art of swimming," unencumbered by attire, you + wait until the twelve o'clock red-flag is run up--when the + ladies retire.[18] + + [18] "Life at Watering-Places--Our Newport Correspondent," _Frank + Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (August 29, 1857), vol. 4, no. + 91, p. 197. + +From its early beginnings, in the late 18th and early 19th century, the +summer excursion to the resorts and spas grew in popularity. In 1848, a +writer of a Philadelphia fashion report explained that + + Very few ladies of fashion are now in town, most of them being + birds of passage during the last of July and all of August. Most + Americans seem to have adopted the fashion of visiting + watering-places through the summer.[19] + + [19] "Chit-Chat upon Philadelphia Fashions for August," _Godey's + Lady's Book_ (August 1848), vol. 37, p. 119. + +As the summer excursion became a social event, the recreational +possibilities of bathing overshadowed its earlier therapeutic function. +Bathing became part of an increasingly elaborate schedule of activities +where each event--bathing, dining, concerts, balls, promenades, carriage +rides--had its appointed time, place, and proper costume. + +[Illustration: Figure 3.--"SCENE AT CAPE MAY," _Godey's Lady's Book_, +August 1849. (_Courtesy of The New York Public Library._)] + +In addition to stiff ocean breezes, seaside resorts had an extra appeal +that beguiled visitors away from the spas--namely mixed bathing. For +during the bathing hour at the seashore all the stiffness and etiquette +of select society was abandoned to pleasure. + + Again and again I try it. Deliriusm! I forget even Miss ----, + and dive headforemost into the billows. I rush to meet them. I + jump on their backs. I ride on their combs, or I let them roll + over me.... I am in the thickest of the bathers, and amid the + roar of waves, am driven wild with excitement by the shouts of + laughter; burst of noisy merriment, and little jolly female + shrieks of fun. All are wild with excitement, ducking, diving, + splashing, floating, rollicking.[20] + + [20] "My First Day at Cape May," _Peterson's Magazine_ (August 1856), + vol. 30, no. 2, p. 91. + +Thus bathing was transformed from a medicinal treatment to a pleasurable +pursuit. + +Excursionists had to be hardy individuals, firm in their resolve to +complete their trip. Although many railroad lines had been completed +by the 1850s, transportation problems were by no means solved. For +example, a New York tourist who planned to enjoy a summer at Lake George +had to travel by boat from New York City to Albany and Troy, then by +railroad to Morean Corner, and, finally, by stage to the lake. After +listing the difficulties endured by excursionists, a particularly +embittered correspondent commented in 1856, "... we envy these happy +people in nothing but the power to be idle."[21] + + [21] _Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (July 26, 1856), vol. 2, + no. 33, p. 102. + +[Illustration: Figure 4.--"THE BATHE AT NEWPORT," by Winslow Homer, +_Harper's Weekly Newspaper_, September 1858. (Smithsonian photo 59665.)] + +By the 1870s, travel facilities were rapidly being improved and many new +summer resorts were established which appealed to a larger segment of +the population. + + Comparatively few can stay long at one time at the springs or + seaside resorts, and hence the peculiar value of arrangements + like those for enabling multitudes to take frequent short + pleasant excursions down the New York Bay and along the Atlantic + coast, as well as up the Hudson, and through Long Island + Sound.[22] + + [22] "Summer Recreation," _Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (June + 18, 1870), vol. 30, no. 768, p. 210. + +Beaches that catered to a large cross-section of the population provided +a wide variety of informal activities that replaced the established +functions found at the more select bathing resorts. For example, the +illustration of Coney Island in 1878 (fig. 5) shows a puppet show; pony +rides for children; a hurdy gurdy; vendors of walking sticks, +sunglasses, and food; and guide ropes in the water for timid bathers. + +[Illustration: Figure 5.--"SCENES AND INCIDENTS ON CONEY ISLAND," +_Harper's Weekly Newspaper_, August 1878. + +(Smithsonian photo 59666.)] + +In the 1890s foreign visitors were impressed by American concern with +finding opportunities to play; early in the century they had remarked on +the apparent lack of interest in amusements. The term, "summer resorts," +no longer referred to a relatively small number of fashionable watering +places. The _New York Tribune_ was running eight columns of summer hotel +advertisements aimed directly at the middle class. The popular _Summer +Tourist and Excursion Guide_ listed moderate-priced hotels and railroad +excursions; it was a far departure from the fashionable tour of the +1840s. + +Thus, as economic and technological factors changed, bathing was +transformed from a medicinal treatment for the leisure class to a +recreation enjoyed by a large portion of the population. + + +SWIMMING + +As has been stated earlier, swimming was being practiced by men in +Europe when the early colonists were leaving their old homes. +Nevertheless, the task of establishing new homes left them little time +to practice the "art of swimming" or to teach it to fellow colonists. + +Benjamin Franklin is no doubt the most famous early proponent of +swimming in the colonies. In his autobiography written in the form of a +letter to his son in 1771, Franklin revealed his early interest in +swimming. + + I had from a child been delighted with this exercise, had + studied and practiced Thevenot's motions and position, and added + some of my own, aiming at the graceful and easy, as well as the + useful.[23] + + [23] JARED SPARKS, _The Works of Benjamin Franklin_ (Boston: Tappan + and Whittemore, 1844), vol. I, pp. 63-64. + +Benjamin Franklin used every opportunity to encourage his friends to +learn to swim, + + as I wish all men were taught to do in their youth; they would, + on many occurrences, be the safer for having that skill, and on + many more the happier, as freer from painful apprehensions of + danger, to say nothing of the enjoyment in so delightful and + wholesome an exercise.[24] + + [24] J. FROST, _The Art of Swimming_ (New York: P. W. Gallaudet, + 1818), p. 57. + +Not only was Franklin in favor of being able to swim but when requested +he advised friends on methods for how to teach oneself. His +instructions, in his letter of September 28, 1776 to Mr. Oliver Neale, +were published a number of times even as late as the 1830s. + +America's first swimming school was established at Boston in 1827 by +Francis Liefer. Two expert swimmers, John Quincy Adams and John James +Audubon, the ornithologist, visited the school and each expressed +delight at having found such an establishment. + +Numerous books instructing men how to swim were brought into the United +States in the early 19th century and some were republished here, but the +first original work (i.e., not a plagiarism) by an American was not +published until 1846. In this book the author, James Arlington Bennet, +M.D., LL.D., based his instructions upon his own personal observations +as an experienced swimmer. Dr. Bennet's publication requires special +note not only due to the basic value of the information but because of +the extraordinary title (i.e., _The Art of Swimming Exemplified by +Diagrams from Which Both Sexes May Learn to Swim and Float on the Water; +and Rules for All Kinds of Bathing in the Preservation of Health and +Cure of Disease, with the Management of Diet from Infancy to Old Age, +and a Valuable Remedy Against Sea-sickness_). Thanks to this explicit +title we learn that Dr. Bennet was in favor of women learning to swim. +This energetic aquatic activity had long been considered a masculine +skill and, despite such a significant publication, this attitude +continued until much later in the century. + +We have already noted in a previous discussion that the Berkeley Springs +bath houses of the 1850s provided a swimming bath for men but no similar +facilities for women. Also at certain seaside resorts of the same +period, a special time was set for men to practice the art of swimming +without clothing, but women had no similar opportunity. When the ladies +entered the water they were clothed from head to toe because men were +also present. The description of women's bathing costume, which will +appear in a later section, clearly shows that women could do little more +than try to maintain their footing. Undoubtedly some "brazen" women did +find the opportunity to swim, but the general attitude was that women +should only immerse themselves in water. + +By the 1860s there was a widespread health movement which gave +additional momentum to the belief that physical exercise was good for +one's well-being. As a result, women were being encouraged to emerge +from their state of physical inactivity imposed by social custom. +Swimming had already gained recognition as a healthful exercise for men, +but with this fresh approach it was even being suggested that women +should swim. A column that appeared in 1866, entitled "Physical Exercise +for Females," asserted that + + Bathing, as it is practiced at our coast resorts, is, no doubt, + a delightful recreation; but if to it swimming could be added, + the delight would be increased, and the possible use and + advantage much extended.[25] + + [25] _Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper_ (August 25, 1866), vol. + 22, no. 569, p. 355. + +In answer to the possible objection that the facilities for teaching +were not always available, the writer maintained that in addition to the +seashore there were rivers, lakes, and ponds as well as the swimming +baths found in most large cities. He further asserted that if the demand +were great enough, certain days could be appropriated exclusively to +women as was done in some of the London baths. + +The type of baths referred to in this case were not built simply to +supply a health-giving treatment or for recreation as described earlier. +As part of the health movement mentioned above, there was a growing +concern in regards to personal cleansing; it was realized that merely +splashing water on the face in the morning was not sufficient for good +personal hygiene. While facilities for washing the whole body were being +installed in wealthy homes, there was also a growing concern for the +masses of people who could not afford such extravagance. Thus +philanthropic individuals encouraged the building of public swimming +baths in densely populated, low income areas. It was hoped that, +although the patrons would be covered by bathing costume and would be +seeking refreshment and recreation, this unaccustomed contact with water +would improve their personal hygiene. + +In 1870 a reporter for _Leslie's_, who was describing two elegant large +bathhouses (the type described above) in New York City, stated that +Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays were set apart for ladies and Tuesdays, +Thursdays, and Saturdays for gentlemen. These baths became quite popular +in the large cities, particularly among people who could not afford the +time or money to make trips even to the near seaside resorts. By the +1880s they were so popular that bathing time was scheduled to allow many +sets of bathers to enjoy the water. Thus a number of women who had +probably never been completely covered with water before had the +opportunity to learn to swim. + +While women were being encouraged to practice swimming as a healthful +exercise, this activity was being recognized as a recreation and sport +for men. The increasing affluence during the last three decades of the +19th century, which made possible the widespread popularity of summer +excursions, encouraged swimming as an individual pastime as well as a +growing spectator sport. This was true not only for swimming but for +nearly every sport we enjoy today. In 1871 a reporter wrote: + + It is not underrating the interest attached to yachting or + rowing matches, to say that swimming clubs and swimming matches + can be made to create wider and more useful emulation among "the + Million" who can never participate in or benefit by those + notable trials of skill and muscle.[26] + + [26] Ibid. (July 29, 1871), vol. 32, no. 826, p. 322. + +By the 1890s this growing interest in spectator and individual sports +evidenced several interesting results. Separate sporting pages were +established in the formats of many newspapers. In addition to being a +summer pastime, "the art of swimming" became an intercollegiate and +Olympic sport, and was included on the roster of events for the 1896 +revival of the Olympic Games held in Athens. Innovations in facilities +and techniques helped to alter the character of swimming. The most +notable of these were the development of the indoor pool and the +introductions of the crawl stroke into the United States. + +It was in this time period that swimming for women was becoming socially +acceptable. In 1888, Goucher College, a prominent girls' school, built +its own indoor pool and the following year swimming was listed in its +catalog for the first time. Writers, in turn, no longer felt it +necessary to convince readers that women should be more active in the +water, but concentrated instead on what a woman should know when she +swims. This changing attitude gained world-wide recognition in 1912 at +Stockholm when the 100-meter swimming event for women was included in +the schedule. + +The period of prosperity following World War I brought a marked increase +in the appreciation of recreation, resulting in an increase of swimming +pools and available beaches. Indoor pools, which made swimming a +year-round activity, were becoming even more numerous than beaches. +Swimming was now established as a sport and a recreation for both men +and women. According to a 1924 magazine article in the _Delineator_, +seldom was a swimming meet held anywhere in the country without events +for women. At Palm Beach, however, one of the few remaining citadels of +"high society," an axiom of fashion dictated that a lady or gentleman +not go into the water before 11:45 in the morning; should one do so, one +ran the risk of being taken for a maid or valet. The masses, however, +swam for pleasure without regard to the inhibitions of high fashion. + +This period was also marked by the advent of swimming personalities of +both sexes. Johnny Weissmuller became a popular hero for his +accomplishments in competitive swimming from 1921 to 1929. Even before +the war Annette Kellerman, star of vaudeville and movies, had become +famous for her fancy diving as well as her celebrated figure, which she +daringly exhibited in a form-fitting, one-piece suit. In addition to +writing an autobiography, she authored articles and a swimming +instruction book for women. As an example of what exercise, including +swimming, could do for women, Annette Kellerman also lent her name to a +course of physical culture for less "well-developed" ladies. Another +product of this new age of recreation was Gertrude Ederle, who learned +to swim at the Woman's Swimming Association of New York. She rose to +sudden fame in 1926 as the first woman to swim the English Channel. + +As previously stated, swimming was practiced through the Middle Ages as +a useful skill for men. Gradually this activity became regarded as also +a healthful exercise and then as a recreation. Finally by the late 19th +century swimming also had achieved the status of a competitive +sport--but for men only. It was not until the 1920s that social +attitudes permitted women the same full use of the water as men. + +The restrictive attitudes defining women's proper behavior in the water +prior to the 1920s were one element of the mores defining women's +participation in society. Thus as more liberal attitudes gained +acceptance and modified the original concept of the "weaker sex," women +gradually achieved social acceptance of their full participation in +aquatic activities. + + + + +Bathing Costume + + +Bathing became popular as a medicinal treatment for both men and women +of the new world in the last half of the 18th century. It was the only +aquatic activity, however, that was considered proper for women until +over a hundred years later. + +Like so many other customs, changes in bathing costume styles were +initially introduced by way of England. They were adapted or rejected +according to the special conditions of this continent. To give a clearer +picture of the costume worn in the colonies and in the United States, +descriptions of the English dress will be included where pertinent. I +have not, however, found any evidence showing that bathing nude was a +practice for women in this country. + + +THE EARLY BATHING GOWN + +It is disappointing but not surprising to discover the lack of +descriptions pertaining to early bathing costume. This simple gown was +utilitarian, not decorative. Thus it deserved little attention in the +eyes of the contemporary bather. + +No doubt it is due to the importance of the original owner that the +following example has survived. In the collection of family memorabilia +at Mount Vernon, there is a chemise-type bathing gown that is said to +have been worn by Martha Washington (fig. 6). According to a note +attached to the gown signed by Eliza Parke Custis, and addressed to +"Rosebud," a pet name for her daughter, Martha Washington probably wore +this bathing gown at Berkeley Springs as she accompanied her daughter, +Patsy, in her bath. + +This blue and white checked linen gown has several construction details +similar to the chemise, a woman's undergarment, of the period. The +sleeves were gathered near the shoulder and were set in with a gusset at +the armpit. The skirt of the gown was made wider at the bottom by the +usual method of adding four long triangular pieces--one to each side of +both the front and back. The sleeves, however, are not as full as those +one would expect to find on a chemise of the period. Also a chemise +would probably have had a much wider neckline gathered by a draw-string +threaded through a band at the neck edge. Instead, this bathing gown has +a moderately low neckline made wider by a slit down the front which is +closed by two linen tapes sewn to either edge of the front. Although +less fabric was used for the bathing gown than was normally required to +make a chemise, it was probably not because of functional considerations +as one might like to think, but because of the scarcity of fabric. Close +examination reveals that the triangular sections of fabric used to add +fullness to the skirt consist of several pieces. In fact the two +sections used in the back are made from a different fabric, although it +is still a blue and white checked linen. Frugal use of scraps in linings +and hidden sections of decorative costume was common practice in the +18th century. The piecing of the bathing gown is further evidence of the +fact that it was a garment that had no ornamental purpose. + +[Illustration: Figure 6.--LINEN BATHING GOWN said to have been worn by +Martha Washington. (_Courtesy of The Mount Vernon Ladies' +Association._)] + +Of particular interest are the lead disks which are wrapped in linen and +attached near the hem next to the side seams by means of patches. No +doubt these weights were used to keep the gown in place when the bather +entered the water. + +The following account of bathing in Dover, England, in 1782 suggests how +the bathing gown might have been used at Berkeley Springs: + + The Ladies in a morning when they intend to bathe, put on a long + flannel gown under their other clothes, walk down to the beach, + undress themselves to the flannel, then they walk in as deep as + they please, and lay hold of the guides' hands, three or four + together sometimes. + + Then they dip over head twenty times perhaps; then they come + onto the shore where there are women that attend with towels, + cloaks, chairs, etc. The flannel is stripp'd off, wip'd dry, + etc. Women hold cloaks round them. They dress themselves and go + home.[27] + + [27] _Diary of John Crosier_, 1782, as quoted in C. WILLETT and + PHILLIS CUNNINGTON, _Handbook of English Costume in the + Eighteenth Century_ (London: Faber and Faber, 1957), p. 404. + +The earliest illustration showing costume worn in the United States for +fresh water bathing is dated 1810 (see fig. 2). Unfortunately the +painting reveals only that the bathing gowns were long and dark colored +in comparison with the white dresses of the period. + +An 1848 article which described, in detail, the fashionable dress called +for by each activity at summer resorts, concludes with the following +tantalizing paragraph: + + We have no space for an extended description of suitable + bathing-dresses. They may be procured at any of our town + establishments for the purpose. Much depends upon individual + taste in their arrangement, for uncouth as they often of + necessity are, they can be improved by a little tact.[28] + + [28] Loc. cit. (footnote 19). + +This is the only reference to American bathing costume of the second +quarter of the 19th century that the author has found at this time. +Nevertheless, an English source describes what must have been a +transitional style between the chemise-type bathing gown and the more +fitted costume of the 1850s. + +The _Workwoman's Guide_, published in London, 1840, included +instructions for making both a bathing gown and a bathing cap. Health +and modesty were the main considerations that influenced the choice of +color and type of material. + + Bathing gowns are made of blue or white flannel, stuff, + calimanco, or blue linen. As it is especially desirable that the + water should have free access to the person, and yet that the + dress should not cling to, or weigh down the bather, stuff or + calimanco are preferred to most other materials; the dark + coloured gowns are the best for several reasons, but chiefly + because they do not show the figure, and make the bather less + conspicuous than she would be in a white dress.[29] + + [29] A LADY, _The Workwoman's Guide_ (London: Simpkin, Marshall, and + Co., 1840), p. 61. + +The following details reveal that, in general, this 1840 bathing gown +starts as an unshaped garment similar to the gown attributed to Martha +Washington [brackets are mine]. + + As the width of the materials, of which a bathing gown is made, + varies, it is impossible to say of how many breadths it should + consist. The width at the bottom, when the gown is doubled, + should be about 15 nails [1 nail = 21/4 in.]: fold it like a + pinafore, slope 31/2 nails for the shoulders, cut or open slits of + 31/2 nails long for the armholes, set in plain sleeves 41/2 nails + long, 31/2 nails wide, and make a slit in front 5 nails long.[30] + + [30] Loc. cit. (footnote 29). + +The instructions for finishing this gown, however, show that the sleeves +were worn close around the wrists and that the fullness of the skirt was +secured at the waist by a belt. + + In making up, delicacy is the great object to be attended to. + Hem the gown at the bottom, gather it into a band at the top, + and run in strings; hem the opening and the bottom of the + sleeves and put in strings. A broad band should be sewed in + about half a yard from the top, to button round the waist.[31] + + [31] Loc. cit. (footnote 29). + +By the addition of the above details this type of bathing gown more +closely approximates the style of the long-skirted blouse of the 1850s +to be described later. + +In regard to the bathing cap we are told that, + + These are made of oil-silk, and are worn, when bathing, by + ladies who have long hair.... It is advisable, however, for + those who have not long hair, to bathe in plain linen caps, so + as to admit the water without the sand or grit, and thus the + bather, unless prohibited on account of health, enjoys all the + benefit of the shock without injuring the hair.[32] + + [32] Ibid., p. 68. + +The "Scene at Cape May" (fig. 3) shows women wearing long-skirted, +long-sleeved, belted gowns as well as head coverings similar to the type +described in _The Workwoman's Guide_. + +Thus during the period when bathing became popular as a medicinal +treatment, women wore loose, open gowns perhaps patterned after a common +undergarment, the chemise. Although this chemise-type bathing costume +must have been very comfortable when dry, its fullness was restrictive +when wet. The bather could only immerse herself in water which was all +that was necessary for the treatment. As the recreational possibilities +of bathing began to overshadow its health-giving properties, women's +bathing dresses also became more fitted, following the general +silhouette of women's fashions. + +[Illustration: SCENE AT CONEY ISLAND--SEA BATHING ILLUSTRATED. + +Figure 7.--SEA BATHING AT CONEY ISLAND, from _Frank Leslie's Illustrated +Newspaper_, September 1856. + +(Smithsonian photo 58437.)] + + +BIFURCATED BATHING DRESS + +During the first half of the 19th century in England and the United +States, a more tolerant attitude toward feminine exercise led women to +abandon the fiction that they were not bipedal while bathing. This +acknowledgment, however, was not fostered solely by the need for a more +functional bathing dress. It was first evidenced by a few daring +European women who wore lace-edged pantaloons trimmed with several rows +of tucking under their daytime dresses. The shorter, untrimmed, +knee-length drawers which quickly replaced the pantaloons, became an +unseen but essential item in the fashionable English lady's toilette of +the 1840s. These drawers, or a plainer version of the longer pantaloons, +were adapted not only to the female riding habit but the bathing dress +as well. An 1828 English source reported that "Many ladies when riding +wear silk drawers similar to what is worn when bathing."[33] With the +increased interest in physical exercise for women, ankle-length, open +pantaloons also were being worn in the 1840s with a long overdress as an +early form of gymnasium suit. This evidence of the early use of drawers +suggests that, like English ladies, women in the United States were +probably wearing a type of drawers beneath their nondescript bathing +gowns during the second quarter of the 19th century. There is some +slight support of this theory in the following stanza of a poem that +appeared in 1845: + + But go to the beach ere the morning be ended + And look at the bathers--oh what an array + The ladies in trowsers, the _gemmen_ in _blowses_ + E'en red flannel shirts are the "go" at Cape May.[34] + + [33] As quoted in C. WILLETT and PHILLIS CUNNINGTON, _The History of + Underclothes_ (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), p. 130. + + [34] "Cape May," _Godey's Lady's Book_ (December 1845), vol. 31, p. + 268. + +The rather crude but delightful sketch of seabathing at Coney Island in +1856 (fig. 7) shows the ladies wearing very full, ankle-length, trousers +with a sack top extending loosely only a few inches below the waist. +This type of bathing costume, which was primarily a bifurcated garment +instead of a skirted one, became the prevailing fashion as reported in +English women's magazines of the 1860s. + +In contrast to the originally European skirtless costume, the +Philadelphia publication, _Peterson's Magazine_, stated that bathing +dress should consist of a pair of drawers and a long-skirted dress. The +recommended drawers were full and confined at the ankle by a band that +was finished with a ruffle. These drawers were attached to a "body" and +fastened so that, even if the skirt washed up, the individual could not +possibly be exposed. The dress was made by pleating or gathering the +desired length of material onto a deep yoke with a separate belt +securing the fullness at the waist. The bottom of the hem was about +three inches above the ankle and was considered rather short. Loose +shirt sleeves were drawn around the wrist by a band which was finished +with a deep ruffle as a protection against the sun. According to this +article many women wore a small talma or cape which hid the figure to +some extent. It was recommended that the drawers, dress, and talma be +made of the same woolen material. + + Bathing-dresses, although generally very unbecoming can be made + to look very prettily with a little taste. If the dress is of a + plain color, such as grey, blue or brown, a trimming around the + talma, collar, yoke, ruffles etc ..., of crimson, green or + scarlet, is a great addition.[35] + + [35] "Fashions for August, Bathing Dresses," _Peterson's Magazine_ + (August 1856), vol. 30, p. 145. + +To complete a bathing toilette the following items were considered +necessary: a pair of large lisle thread gloves, an oil cap to protect +the hair from the water, a straw hat to shield the face from the sun, +and gum overshoes for tender feet. + +[Illustration: Figure 8.--BATHING DRESS, c. 1855. (_Courtesy of +Philadelphia Museum of Art._ Photograph by A. J. Wyatt, staff +photographer.)] + +The red, tan, and blue-green checked bathing dress shown in figure 8 is +jauntily trimmed with crimson braid edging the collar, belt, and wrist +and ankle bands. This costume is a variation of the style described +previously. The drawers, unlike those described in _Peterson's +Magazine_, are sewn to a linen band with linen suspenders attached. The +unfitted, unshaped skirt (8 ft. 8 in. in circumference) is pulled in at +the waist by a belt attached to the center back. A similar technique for +forming a waistline is described in _The Workwoman's Guide_ of 1840. + +Women's magazines in the United States from the third quarter of the +19th century show illustrations of bathing costume, but in many +instances these publications used European fashion plates. _Harper's +Bazar_, (spelled thus until 1929) particularly in its early years, used +fashion plates and pattern supplements from its German predecessor _Der +Bazar_. Thus, in one issue one can find a fashion plate showing the +predominantly bifurcated European bathing suit and, in a column on New +York fashions, a separate description of long-skirted bathing dresses +with trousers. During the same period _Peterson's Magazine_ had +illustrations previously used in the London publication, _Queen's +Magazine_. + +American women seem to have accepted the majority of styles shown in +European fashion plates, except for the skirtless bathing suits. The +writer of an 1868 column on New York fashions sought to convince his +readers to try the more daring European style although he grudgingly +admitted that the "Bathing suits made with trousers and blouse waist +without skirt are objected to by many ladies as masculine and +fast...."[36] This style was in fact, very similar to the costume worn +by men when they bathed with the ladies. A year later, the writer of the +same fashion column had given up the campaign to dress all women in the +skirtless suits and admitted that these imports "... are worn by expert +swimmers, who do not wish to be encumbered with bulky clothing."[37] +Such practical bathing dress was thus limited to a very small number of +progressive women. + + [36] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (August 8, 1868), vol. 1, + no. 41, p. 643. + + [37] Ibid. (July 10, 1869), vol. 2, no. 28, p. 435. + +The majority, consisting of those who were strictly bathers, wore the +ankle-length drawers beneath a long dress as described or illustrated in +the majority of sources that originated in the United States. Why was +the European bathing suit not fully adopted by American women? +Differences between the bathing customs of the two continents +undoubtedly encouraged the development of different dress. While men and +women in the United States bathed together freely at the seashore during +the latter half of the 19th century, this practice was not widely +accepted in England until the early 1900s. In the presence of men, +American women probably felt compelled to retain their more concealing +dress and drawers. + +In England swimming seems to have been more popular among women than it +was in the United States. While encouraging its readers to swim, during +the late 1860s, _Queen's Magazine_ used forceful language of a kind that +was not found in American publications until the late 19th century. If +swimming was more acceptable as a feminine exercise in England it is +understandable why English women were more receptive to a functional, +skirtless bathing suit--especially since it was worn only in the +presence of other women. + +In 1858, Winslow Homer, who was later to become a well-known American +painter, was welcomed into the society at Newport until it became +apparent that he wanted to sketch the bathers for a weekly newspaper +(see fig. 4). So great were the ensuing objections that he was permitted +to complete his sketches "... provided he depicted the bathers only in +the water and only above the waistline and without divulging the +identity of the bathers."[38] + + [38] B. BROOKE, "Bathing-dress with Hat and Gloves," _Hobbies_ (August + 1958), vol. 63, p. 90. + +As can be seen in figure 4, these sketches serve more as a testament of +Homer's fancy than as an accurate historical statement on style. The two +feminine legs exposed in the water from just below the knee to the toe +and the feminine head coverings appear to be anachronisms. According to +several other illustrations of the period, these women were undoubtedly +wearing long drawers. The young artist at 22, however, has been +described as having an eye for feminine beauty and a sense of fashion. +He seems to have exploited to the full the decorative possibilities of +hoop skirts blown by the breeze or agitated by some pretty accident to +discreetly reveal a trim ankle. A drama of breeze versus long skirt +appears with the small feminine figure in the left background of this +print. The force of the waves and the motion of the frolicking bathers +gave the artist opportunity to show two more pretty accidents. The only +head covering he showed for feminine bathers was a ruffled cap that +framed the face. Other sources show Newport bathers wearing the less +attractive wide-brimmed straw hat (fig. 9). The straw headgear worn over +these caps seems more likely since Newport's fashionable belles would +surely have sacrificed appearances and worn a straw hat to avoid an +unfashionable sunburn and tan. + +[Illustration: Figure 9.--BATHING HAT of natural color and purple straw, +c. 1880. (Smithsonian photo P-65409.)] + +Nevertheless, Homer's sketch reflects characteristics seen in certain +surviving examples from the 1860s--namely that the top was becoming more +fitted, being attached completely to a belt with the fuller skirt +pleated or gathered to the bottom edge of the belt. In the Design +Laboratory Collection of the Brooklyn Museum there is an 1860 black +poplin specimen that may be a bathing dress. This example is trimmed at +the shoulder seam with epaulets, an example of the extent to which +fashion was finally playing a part in bathing costume.[39] + + [39] Photograph and pattern appears in Blanch Payne, _History of + Costume_ (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), pp. 518, 583-584. + +The dresses described above appear peculiar not only to 20th century +eyes, but they also seem to have amused mid-19th century correspondents. +One writer in 1857 declared that, + + We don't think a man could identify his own wife when she comes + out of the bathing-house. A plump figure enters, surrounded with + a multitude of rustly flounces and scarcely able to squeeze an + enormous hoop through the door. She is absent a few minutes, and + presto change! out comes a tall lank apparition, wrapped in the + scanty folds of something that looks more like a superannuated + night-gown than anything else, and a battered straw-chapeau + knocked down over the eyes, and stalks down towards the beach + with the air and gait of a Tartar chieftain![40] [fig. 10.] + + [40] "An Excursion to Long Branch," _Frank Leslie's Illustrated + Newspaper_ (August 22, 1857), vol. 4, no. 90, p. 182. + +Another writer felt that he + + ... must say--even in the columns of _Frank Leslie's + Illustrated_--that they don't look very picturesque or pretty + when _a la Naiade_.... Rather limp, sacks tied in the middle, + eel-bottles, hydropathic coalheavers and "longshoremen," and + preternaturally dilapidated Bloomers, would appear to be the + ideals aimed at.[41] [fig. 11.] + + [41] Loc. cit. (footnote 18). + +This use of the term "Bloomers," referring to long full drawers or +trousers, is a reminder of how similar the 1855 bathing gown with +drawers (see fig. 8) was to the reform dress introduced in 1848 and worn +by Amelia Bloomer, the feminist, in 1852. + +Despite the evident use of a new waistline treatment, the most popular +bathing costume of the 1870s, according to _Harper's Bazar_, continued +to feature the yoke blouse that reached at least to the knee. This +combination of blouse and skirt was held in position at the waist by a +belt. The high neck was finished with a sailor collar or a standing +pleated frill, while the long sleeves and full Turkish trousers, +buttoned on the side of the ankle, concealed the limbs. In 1873 a column +on New York fashions reported an effort to popularize short-sleeved, +low-throated suits then in favor at European bathing places and which +had been illustrated in the _Bazar_. Nevertheless, the writer hedged +this report by adding that + + It is thought best, however, to provide an extra pair of long + sleeves that may be buttoned on or basted in the short puffs + that are sewn in the arm holes. Sometimes a small cape fastening + closely about the throat is also added.[42] + + [42] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (July 19, 1873), vol. 6, + no. 29, p. 451. + +Nevertheless, sketches of bathing scenes from the seventies indicate +that some American women wore even shorter sleeves and trousers than +those prescribed by the fashion magazines. + +Linen and wool fabrics were both suggested in the 1840s, but by the +1870s flannel was most frequently used for bathing dresses, with serge +also being recommended. Navy blue, and to a lesser extent, white, gray, +scarlet, and brown were popular colors in checks as well as solid +colors trimmed with white, red, gray, or blue worsted braid. + +[Illustration: Figure 10.--"HOW SHE WENT IN," from _Harper's Bazar_, +August 1870. (Smithsonian photo 61585A.)] + +Bathing mantles or cloaks were worn to conceal the moist figure when +crossing the beach. These garments were made of Turkish toweling with +wide sleeves and hoods, and were so long as "to barely escape" the +ground. + +In 1873 one good bathing cap was described as an oiled silk bag-crown +cap large enough to hold the hair loosely. The frill around the edge was +bound with colored braid. Many ladies preferred, however, to let their +hair hang loose and under a wide-brimmed hat of coarse straw tied down +on the sides to protect their skin from the sun (fig. 9). + +Bathing shoes or slippers were generally worn when the shore was rough +and uneven. In 1871 manila sandals were worn, but the most functional +bathing shoes are said to have been high buskins of thick unbleached +cotton duck with cork soles. They were secured with checked worsted +braid. Two years later there were bathing shoes of white duck or sail +canvas with manila soles. Slippers for walking in the sand were "mules" +or merely toes and soles made of flannel, braided to match the cloak, +and sewn to cork soles. + +Throughout this period the social aspect of bathing predominated over +the therapeutic goals and women were making a greater effort to +transform their bathing garments into attractive and functional outfits. +Motivated by the presence of men at the seashore and by the competition +with other women for masculine attention, ladies were more concerned +with the style of their bathing dresses and appropriate trimmings. Thus +bathing costume joined the ranks of other fashions described in women's +magazines. + +[Illustration: Figure 11.--"HOW SHE CAME OUT," from _Harper's Bazar_, +August 1870. (Smithsonian photo 61585B.)] + +Now that women were frolicking in the water rather than simply being +dunked several times, their costume became somewhat more functional. +Long trousers gave them greater freedom in the water although the skirts +which continued to be worn, tended to negate this improvement. Even as +early as the 1870s there were efforts to shorten sleeves and eliminate +high necklines. This trend to make bathing dress more practical +increased in momentum toward the end of the century. + +[Illustration: Figure 12.--BATHING COSTUMES from a supplement to _The +Tailor's Review_, July 1895. + +(_Courtesy of Library of Congress._)] + + +PRINCESS STYLE BATHING DRESS + +Although attitudes toward sports were more enlightened by the 1880s, +many women continued to wear the old bathing dress with its belted +blouse extending to a long skirt and a pair of trousers. As an alternate +to this garb, the "princess style" was developed with the blouse and +trousers cut in one piece or else sewn permanently to the same belt. A +separate skirt extending below the knee was buttoned at the waist to +conceal the figure. This new style in bathing costume was probably +derived from an innovation in women's underwear. During the late 1870s a +new style of undergarment, the "combination" of chemise and drawers, had +come into use. Petticoats could be fastened to buttons sewn around the +waist of the combination. This streamlining of undergarments helped the +lady of fashion to maintain a desirably svelte figure. Apparently the +advantages of this streamlining were obvious, because it was not long +before women were quietly adapting this style to bathing dresses. By the +1890s the skirt was often omitted for swimming (fig. 12), giving the +more active women more freedom in the water. Following popular dress +styles, the top of the bathing costume was bloused over the belt. The +sailor collar, either large or small, was a great favorite, but a +straight standing collar with rows of white braid was also worn. + +The "princess style" was not the only innovation available in bathing +dress. _Harper's Bazar_ reported in 1881 that imported French bathing +suits[43] for ladies were made without sleeves, since any covering on +the arm interfered with the freedom desirable for swimming. +Nevertheless, according to other contemporary fashion descriptions, +American bathing suits retained their long sleeves until the early 1880s +when the foreign fashion of short sleeves came to the United States. In +1885 it was reported that + + The sleeves may be the merest 'caps' four or five inches deep + under the arm, curved narrow toward the top, and lapped there or + they may be half-long and straight, reaching to the elbows, or + else they may be the regular coat sleeves covering the arms to + the wrist. With the short sleeves it is customary to add the + sleeves cut from a gauze vest to give the arm some protection + from the sun.[44] + + [43] The term "bathing suit" as opposed to "bathing dress" came into + use in the last quarter of the 19th century when the bifurcated + bathing garment with a shorter skirt was widely accepted. The two + terms, however, continued to be used interchangeably, with + "bathing dress" appearing less frequently. + + [44] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (July 4, 1885), vol. 18, + no. 27, p. 427. + +Sleeves were pushed up in 1890 and puffed high about the shoulders by +means of elastic tape in the hem. By 1893 fashion reports acknowledged +that sleeve length was a matter of individual choice. + +Despite this neat resolution of the diminishing sleeve, contemporary +sketches of bathing scenes indicate that some women in the United States +were wearing the shorter sleeves even earlier. + +Short full trousers, reaching just below the knee, accompanied by +knee-length skirts--sometimes worn even shorter--succeeded the long +Turkish trousers and ankle-length skirt. As the trousers diminished in +length, long stockings or bathing shoes with long stocking tops became a +necessary part of the bathing costume to cover the lower limbs, +particularly in mixed bathing (see fig. 1). The stockings, which were +cotton or wool, plain or fancy, and of any color or combination of +colors in keeping with the costume, were worn with a variety of bathing +shoes, sandals, or slippers when bathing off a rocky shore. Foot +coverings were usually made of white canvas; the slippers were held on +by a spiral arrangement of braid or ribbon about the ankles, while the +laced shoes were often made with heavy cork soles. A gaiter shoe or +combination shoe and stocking was made of waterproof cloth, laced up the +sides, and reached to about the knees. Low rubber shoes were also worn. + +Bathing caps of waxed linen or oiled silk were used to protect the hair. +They had whale bone in the brim and could be adjusted by drawstrings in +the back. Blue, white, or ecru rubber hats were also used. These caps +had large full crowns--which held in all the hair--and wired brims. A +wide-brimmed rough straw hat, tied on with a strip of trimming braid or +with ribbon, was sometimes worn as protection against the sun (fig. 9). + +Bathing mantles like those of the 1870s were still being worn by the +late 19th century and these were frequently trimmed with colored braid. +Cotton tapes sewn in parallel rows, mohair braid, or strips of flannel +were still being used to make the bathing dress more attractive. + +Navy blue and white, as well as ecru, maroon, gray, and olive were +popular colors for the bathing dress. In 1890 the writer of a fashion +column thought it pertinent to add that "... black bathing suits are +worn as a matter of choice, not merely by those dressing in +mourning."[45] Apparently the wearing of black no longer had this +exclusive significance when bathing, but prior to 1890 it did. + + [45] Ibid. (July 5, 1890), vol. 23, no. 27, p. 523. + +As women became more active in the water and were learning to swim they +began to accept more practical changes in bathing costume. Not only the +style, as described previously, but also the fabric was considered for +its functional characteristics. Flannel was still widely used but was +being replaced by serge which was not as heavy when wet. Another +indication of this trend was that stockinet, a knitted material, was +gaining in popularity at the end of the century. + +The "princess style" of the early 1890s combined the drawers and bodice +in one garment: the separate skirt fell just short of the ends of the +drawers which covered the knees. By the mid-1890s, however, the drawers +which were now called knickerbockers, were shortened so as to be +completely covered by the knee-length skirt. These knickerbockers were +either attached to the waist in the popular "princess style" or they +were fastened to the waist by a series of flat bone buttons. + +During this same period, the mid-1890s, knitted, cotton tights were +sometimes worn in place of knickerbockers. Bathing tights differed from +the knickerbockers in that they were hemmed rather than gathered on an +elastic band at the lower edge and that they were not attached to the +waist. When tights were used they were completely concealed by a +one-piece, knee-length bathing dress. The use of the more streamlined +bathing tights was another step toward more functional bathing costume. +Despite these improvements, most women continued to wear stockings, +usually black, when they bathed or swam in public. The dictates of +fashion and standards of modesty continued to conflict with practical +considerations. + +[Illustration: Figure 13.--BATHING DRESS OF BLACK "MOHAIR," c. 1900. +(Smithsonian photo 60383.)] + +As with street dress, corsets seem to have been an important though +unseen bathing article necessary for maintaining smart posture. In 1896 +it was reported that + + Unless a woman is very slender, bathing corsets should be worn. + If they are not laced tightly they are a help instead of a + hindrance to swimming, and some support is needed for a figure + that is accustomed to wearing stays.[46] + + [46] Ibid. (June 13, 1896), vol. 29, no. 24, p. 503. + +While describing the bathing dresses available in 1910 an article noted: +"Some of these are made up with ... princess forms that are boned so as +to do away with the bathing corset."[47] + + [47] Ibid. (July 1910), vol. 43, no. 7, p. 552. + +The bodice of the bathing costume continued to be bloused, but by 1905 +it was modified to be merely loose. An article appearing in 1896 noted +that bathing suits should be cut high in the neck, not tight around the +throat, but close enough to prevent burning by the sun. The sailor +collar continued to be used during the late 1890s but became less +fashionable shortly after the turn of the century. Nevertheless there +had to be some white around the neck for the bathing dress to be +considered smart. The puffed sleeves, which had become popular in the +late 1890s were modified in breadth and length to allow free use of the +muscles in swimming (fig. 13). + +In 1897 fashion magazines were suggesting that skirts of bathing dresses +looked best when the front breadth was shaped narrower toward the belt, +while by 1902 the skirts were fitted over the hips in order to delineate +the figure. In 1905 pleated skirts again became fashionable, although +flared skirts were still acceptable. + +Dark blue and black were the popular colors, although white, red, gray, +and green were also used. Flannel was no longer recommended for bathing +dress; serge and "mohair"--a fabric with a cotton warp and a mohair or +alpaca weft--were widely used. The impractical bathing dress of silk +fabric was worn by those who could afford this extravagance; thus, the +conspicuous consumption of the "leisure class" was even found at the +beaches. + +Bathing hats were still being worn but it was considered more +fashionable to wear a rubber or oil silk cap covered with a bright silk +turban when there was a surf. For the bather who seldom ventured very +far into the water the most fashionable practice was to have no covering +at all. + +Throughout the 19th century bathing costume followed an impelling course +toward becoming more functional. As the popularity of recreational +bathing and then swimming for women increased, the number of yards of +fabric required to make a bathing dress decreased. Nevertheless, by the +1900s, many women knew how to swim, but the majority were still bathers. +Thus bathing suits continued in use through the first quarter of the +20th century. + + + + +Swimming Costume + + +Bathing costume did not evolve gracefully into the swim suit, nor was +there an abrupt replacement of one garment for the other. Instead, a +garb designed for swimming emerged in the 19th century as tentatively +and as poorly received as had the suggestion that women should be active +in the water. The growing popularity of swimming and the changing status +of women eventually made it possible for the swimming suit to replace +the bathing suit in the 1920s. By the 1930s, however, this trend was +accelerated by a growing advertising and ready-to-wear clothing +industry. Thus a history of the swimming costume tends to divide itself +into two sections: early swimming suits and the influence of the swim +suit industry. + + +EARLY SWIMMING SUITS + +The earliest reference to swimming costume I have found was in 1869. At +this date swimming in the United States was considered a masculine +skill, exercise, and recreation; only men were provided with a real +opportunity to swim at popular watering places. As described previously, +_Harper's Bazar_ reported that American women in general rejected the +European bathing suit made with long trousers and a skirtless waist. +Nevertheless, this costume was "... worn by expert swimmers, who do not +wish to be encumbered with bulky clothing."[48] + + [48] "New York Fashions," _Harper's Bazar_ (July 10, 1869), vol. 2, + no. 28, p. 435. + +In the 1870s the rare descriptions of this more functional +garment--called "swimming suit" even at this early date--were limited to +a sentence or two buried within long columns of fine print describing +popular bathing apparel. One mentions a "... single knitted worsted +garment, fitting the figure, with waist and trousers in one."[49] +Another was made without sleeves as "one garment, the blouse and +trousers being cut all in one, like the sleeping garments worn by small +children."[50] These more practical bifurcated garments probably derived +from the European suit of the 1860s that had been rejected by the +majority of American women. For example, an English source reported that +in 1866 the following garment was worn: "... Swimming Costume, a body +and trousers cut in one, secures perfect liberty of action and does not +expose the figure."[51] + + [49] Ibid. (July 13, 1872), vol. 5, no. 28, p. 459. + + [50] Ibid. (July 25, 1874), vol. 7, no. 30, p. 475. + + [51] As quoted in C. WILLETT CUNNINGTON, _English Women's Clothing in + the 19th Century_ (New York: Thomas Yoseloff, 1958), p. 225. + +The descriptions of American swimming suits, however brief, offered +evidence that the pastime was growing in popularity with women. +Generally speaking, 19th century women's magazines were mere +disseminators of fine and decorous ideas and practices for well-mannered +ladies; their editors were not innovators. With such an editorial policy +it is understandable that these magazines would not, as a rule, +publicize trends of popular origin until they were fairly well +established. The skirtless swimming suit of the 1870s was no doubt more +common in the United States than its meager description in _Harper's +Bazar_ would seem to indicate. + +As long as feminine swimming was not generally accepted, however, +efforts to develop practical swimming suits remained isolated owing to +the lack of communication between manufacturer and consumer and to +traditional attitudes. Feminine interest in swimming and physical +activities threatened belief in the "weaker-sex" that contributed to +maintaining the traditional masculine and feminine roles; efforts to +develop functional swimming dress also attacked established standards of +feminine modesty. These challenges to the status quo were met with the +weapon of the complacent majority--silence. Consequently, from the third +quarter of the 19th century, when we find the first reference to a +specialized garment for swimming in the United States, writings on +swimming costume appeared infrequently until the 1920s. + +In 1886 two "ladies' bathing jerseys" and two bathing suits of the +traditional type appeared in the _First Illustrated Catalogue of Knitted +Bathing Suits_ of J. J. Pfister Company in San Francisco. The captions +over the illustrations leave no question that the briefer bathing +jerseys were intended for swimming while the others were for bathing. +These jerseys--form-fitting tunics that were mid-thigh in length--were +made with high necks and cap sleeves. Underneath this garment women wore +trunks that extended to the knee and stockings; there was also the +alternate choice of tights, a combination of trunks and stockings. To +complete the outfit the feminine reader was encouraged to buy a knitted +skull cap. + +Apparently these bathing jerseys were successful; three, instead of two, +jerseys appeared in the same catalog in 1890. It is obvious from this +later catalog, however, that there was a greater demand for bathing +dresses since twelve designs of the skirted costume were featured as +opposed to the two dresses in the first issue. + +[Illustration: Figure 14.--THE RECOMMENDED COSTUME FOR SWIMMING from J. +Parmly Paret, _The Woman's Book of Sports_, 1901. (Smithsonian photo +58436.)] + +Even by the early 20th century it is difficult to find specific +references to a swimming suit in women's magazines; only occasionally +does a concern with swimming obtrude into the traditional descriptions +of bathing dress. In _The Woman's Book of Sports_, however, J. Parmly +Paret was specific about the requirements for a suitable swimming +costume in 1901. + + It is particularly important that nothing tight should be worn + while swimming, no matter how fashionable a dress may be for + bathing. The exercise requires the greatest freedom, and a + swimming costume should never include corsets, tight sleeves, or + a skirt below the knees. The freedom of the shoulders is the + most important of all, but anything tight around the body + interferes with the breathing and the muscles of the back, while + a long skirt--even one a few inches below the knees--binds the + legs constantly in making their strokes.[52] + + [52] J. PARMLY PARET, _The Woman's Book of Sports_ (New York: D. + Appleton & Co., 1901), p. 74. + +Although this costume (fig. 14) more closely resembles the traditional +bathing dress than the jersey described previously, this discussion +illustrates the growing dichotomy between bathing dress and swimming +dress and between fashionable styles and functional styles. + +Photographs of East coast beach scenes in 1903 show a few women wearing +costumes different from the black or navy blue bathing dress worn by the +majority. These independent spirits seem to be wearing close-fitting +knitted trunks that cover the knees or, when with stockings, come within +an inch or two above the knee. Above these trunks they appear to be +wearing knitted one-piece tunics or belted blouses that cover the hips. +This costume, sleeveless or short-sleeved, and with a simplified +neckline, must have been the functional suit of its day. + +An important impetus was given to the development of the swimming suit +with the entrance of women into swimming as a competitive sport. On +September 5, 1909, Adeline Trapp wore a one-piece knitted swimming suit +when she became the first woman to swim across the East River in New +York, through the treacherous waters of Hell Gate. Both the swimming +suit and the swim were part of a campaign devised by Wilbert +Longfellow--of the U.S. Volunteer Life Saving Corps--to encourage women +to learn to swim. + +Adeline Trapp was a summer employee of the Life Saving Corps in 1909. +Mr. Longfellow saw in the 20-year-old Brooklyn school teacher a +respectable young woman who could be a source of publicity. He ordered +her to get a one-piece swimming suit for the swim. As early as 1899 in +England, a woman participating in competitions organized by the Amateur +Swimming Association could have worn a one-piece, skirtless, knitted +costume with a shaped sleeve at least three inches long, a slightly +scooped neck, and legs that extended to within three inches of the knee. +Mr. Longfellow may have had this English suit in mind. He might have +known of similar suits in the United States or he might have simply +wanted to free Adeline of yards of fabric to make her more competitive +with male swimmers. Nevertheless, Adeline Trapp did not know that the +English suits existed, nor did she know where she could find one. She +spent many hours going from one American manufacturer to another trying +on men's knitted suits. She found that they were all cut too low at the +neck and armholes and did not cover enough of the legs to preclude +criticism. At this point a friend who worked for a stocking manufacturer +offered to get her a suitable costume from England. This costume, a +knitted, gray cotton suit--whether originally for a man or woman in +England is not known--was the one Adeline wore when she swam Hell Gate. + +Although more than thirty men attempted the swim, the fact that a woman +accomplished the feat made newspaper headlines. Following this event, +Miss Trapp received a terse letter from the Brooklyn School Board +stating that they thought it improper for an educator of Brooklyn +children to appear in public so scantily dressed in a one-piece swimming +costume. For her future swims Adeline Trapp was careful to have someone +carry a blanket to throw over her as she emerged from the water.[53] + + [53] Telephone interview with Adeline Trapp Mulhenberg, May 1966. + +In 1910, Annette Kellerman arrived in the United States from Australia +by way of England. For her fancy diving exhibitions she wore sleeveless +one-piece knitted swimming tights that covered her from neck to toe--a +costume she had probably adopted in England. + +The decade from 1910 to 1920 was a crucial period in the history of +bathing and swimming costume. Popular attitudes were changing in favor +of the woman who swam but, as frequently occurs in social reforms, there +was a cultural lag between public opinion and the policies of +institutions. The Red Cross, which began its excellent water safety +program in 1914, taught women to swim but did not admit women as Life +Saving Corps members until 1920. Symbolic of the conflict between old +and new attitudes were the relative roles of bathing and swimming +costume during this period. As Annette Kellerman described them: + + There are two kinds ... those that are adapted for use in water, + and those that are unfit for use except on dry land. If you are + going to swim, wear a water bathingsuit. But if you are merely + going to play on the beach, and pose for the camera fiends, you + may safely wear the dry land variety.... I am certain that there + isn't a single reason under the sun why everybody should not + wear lightweight suits. Anyone who persuades you to wear the + heavy skirty kind is endangering your life.[54] + + [54] ANNETTE KELLERMAN, _How to Swim_ (New York: George H. Doran + Company, 1918), p. 47. + +Chic women's magazines, however, were still reluctant to admit in their +fashion pages that a more utilitarian costume existed. The June 1, 1917 +issue of _Vogue_ reported that there were two kinds of bathing suits: a +loose straight suit and those on surplice lines, "... which hold their +place by virtue of being so very becoming."[55] + + [55] _Vogue_ (June 1, 1917), vol. 49, no. 11, p. 85. + +The most popular of these, the surplice, was not a novelty of the season +but a continuation of 19th century bathing suit styles. Fashion +illustrations show that the hemline of the skirt was approaching the +middle of the knee, with the bloomers remaining hidden. There was also a +revival of the style that permitted the bloomers to show several inches +below the skirt. In this case the bloomers reached the knee and the +skirt was several inches shorter. Both versions were shown with short +sleeves or cap sleeves, or sleeveless; "V" necklines with collars and +square necklines were widely used. The more fashionable creations were +made of silk taffeta or "surf satin," while the majority were made of +"mohair," wool jersey, worsted, or closely woven cotton. Black and navy +blue were unquestionably the favorite colors. + +The loose straight suit, which evidently gained its inspiration from the +chemise frock of the period, had no waistline and hung straight from the +shoulders (fig. 15); a belt or sash was frequently looped below the +natural waistline on the hips. The chemise-type of bathing suit differed +from the surplice only in having no fitted waist and requiring less +fabric. + +[Illustration: Figure 15.--BLACK SILK BATHING DRESS, 1923. + +(Smithsonian photo P-65412.)] + +In the June 15, 1917 issue, _Vogue_ modified its position of two weeks +earlier to acknowledge that there was a third style of costume worn in +the water. Again, the descriptions of the surplice and chemise-type +bathing suits were accompanied by numerous illustrations. No drawings, +however, were published to show the knitted jersey suit that was +described as "... usually sleeveless, quite short and fairly straight +..." and "... intended for the woman who swims expertly."[56] + + [56] Ibid. (June 15, 1917), vol. 49, no. 12, p. 67. + +As late as the early 1920s, the fashion pages of _Harper's Bazar_ and +_Vogue_ were concentrated on the bathing suits, aiming at readers +involved in the social life of the seaside resorts--lounging about the +beach with occasional splashing in the water. The growing numbers of +women who wanted swimming suits, however, had only to turn to the +advertising sections of these same magazines to find that even in 1915 +such shops as Bonwit Teller & Co. and B. Altman & Co. were advertising +knitted swimming suits. + +In June 1916, _Delineator_ solved the dilemma of bathing versus swimming +costume in an intriguing article written to sell a pattern for a bathing +costume. In description and presentation of illustrations, the article +emphasized a costume with "all the features essential to a practical +swimming-suit."[57] The blouse and bloomers were attached at the waist +in this garment which had a square neckline and no skirt or sleeves. +Made up in wool jersey, this would have been a practical swimming +costume for the period. But this was not the only style available from +this one pattern. The following variations were included: a sailor +collar on a "V" neckline; a high-standing collar, long sleeves; and a +detachable skirt with the fullness either pleated or gathered into a +waistband, to be worn long to the knees or just short enough to show +several inches of the bloomer. In this way _Delineator_ succeeded in +satisfying nearly every degree of conservatism--an amazing +accomplishment. + + [57] "For the Modern Mermaid," _Delineator_ (June 1916), vol. 38, no. + 6, p. 52. + +The spring edition of _Sears, Roebuck and Co. Catalog_ for 1916 offered +a one-piece, or "California-style," knitted worsted bathing suit with +the underpiece sewn to a skirt. This costume was less elaborate than the +other dresses shown, although it was still knee length. The 1918 spring +catalog showed two one-piece knitted outfits suitable for swimming in +striking contrast to the surplice bathing dresses that were also +offered. By 1920 all of the bathing costumes illustrated in the _Sears, +Roebuck and Co. Catalog_ were of the more abbreviated and functional +type. + +In 1918 Annette Kellerman recommended that serious swimmers wear +close-fitting swimming tights or the two-piece suits commonly worn by +men. Being quick to admit that this costume would not be tolerated at +all beaches, she told dedicated swimmers to + + ... get one-piece tights anyway and wear over the tights the + lightest garment you can get. It should be a loose sleeveless + garment hung from the shoulders. Never have a tight waist band. + It is a hindrance. Also on beaches where stockings are enforced + your one-piece undergarment should have feet, so that the + separate stocking and its attendant garter is abolished.[58] + + [58] Loc. cit. (footnote 54). + +[Illustration: Figure 16.--ONE-PIECE SWIMMING SUIT OF KNITTED WOOL, c. +1918. (Smithsonian photo P-65413.)] + +Knitted swimming suits found in advertisements of the period were either +one-piece or two-piece; the trunks were attached or separate, but they +always extended a few inches below the brief skirt. Although this +costume could be considered sleeveless, in some examples the suit was +built up under the arm--a concession to the demands of modesty (fig. +16). The scooped or "V" neckline with no collar was relatively high; in +order to put on or remove the suit it was unbuttoned at one shoulder. + +It was this type of swimming costume which evolved into the garment that +dominated the fashion pages of the mid-1920s. + +Changes in costume brought about by the acceptance of swimming also +affected leg covering. By 1920 fashion pages showed stockings that +reached only to the calf and many advertisements for the abbreviated +knitted bathing suits presented the lower leg covered with only the high +laced bathing shoe (fig. 17) or, in a few cases, bare. Bathing slippers +were black satin or black or white canvas held on the feet by ribbon +criss-crossed up the leg to tie at mid-calf. Shoes were of satin or +canvas, laced in the front to mid-calf. + +There was a wide variety of colorful rubber caps; some were gathered on +a band or with a ruffle while others were closely fitted with brims. +Also popular was a close-fitting rubber cap with a colorful scarf tied +around it; swimmers did without the scarf. + +Despite the distinction between the two types of bathing apparel, the +beach cloak continued to be used by both the serious swimmer and those +who stayed safely in the shallows. Some bathing wraps had large collars +and were only mid-calf in length. Colorful beach hats, beach parasols, +bags, and blankets were used, particularly by the bather who seldom got +wet. + +The acceptance of swimming as a feminine activity provided an impetus +for the use of the knitted swimming suit; but standards of modesty had +to change before this suit could gain wide acceptance. Bathing dresses +of the 19th century had been designed to cover, conceal, and obscure not +only the torso but the limbs as well. The swimming suit that was gaining +acceptance in the early 1920s not only revealed the arms and a good part +of the legs, but actually dared to follow the lines of the torso. +Contemporary descriptions, that seem amusingly cautious today, included +such statements as "... all Annette Kellerman Bathing Attire is +distinguished by an incomparable, daring beauty of fit that always +remains refined."[59] Even less cautious was a statement that these +bathing suits were "famous ... for their perfect fit and exquisite, +plastic beauty of line."[60] + + [59] _Harper's Bazar_ (June 1920), vol. 55, no. 6, p. 138. + + [60] Ibid. (June 1921), 54th year, no. 2504, p. 101. + +The growing numbers of women who wore the new styles of bathing dress +were a cause of concern to self-appointed guardians of decency. In 1917 +the convention of the American Association of Park Superintendents at +New Orleans adopted a series of bathing regulations for city beaches +which dealt with the problems of the changing bathing suit. In general +these regulations specified that "... No all-white or flesh-colored +suits are permitted or suits that expose the chest lower than a line +drawn on a level with the arm pits."[61] In regard to ladies' bathing +suits these men agreed that + + Blouse and bloomer suits may be worn with or without stockings, + provided the blouse has quarter-arm sleeves or close-fitting arm + holes, and provided the bloomers are full and not shorter than + four inches above the knee.[62] + + [61] "Bathing Regulations for City Beaches," _American City_ (May + 1917), vol. 16, no. 5, p. 537. + + [62] Loc. cit. (footnote 61). + +Regulations for knitted suits were similar, with the added caution that +the skirt hem could be no more than two inches above the lower edge of +the trunks. As late as 1923 these regulations were in effect at public +beaches in Cleveland and Chicago. + +By 1923 a permanent change was occurring in the design of beach apparel. +The chemise-style bathing dress of black taffeta or satin still appeared +in the fashion magazines (fig. 15), but by 1929 it had disappeared. The +result of the struggle between the fancy bathing suit and the plain +knitted suit became obvious even in the popular magazines of the period. +In the opening paragraphs of a short story, Shirley, the villainess, +donned a smart bathing suit of puffy black taffeta, with a +patent-leather belt and a scarlet scarf, and baked in the shadow of a +big umbrella. Margaret, the heroine, in a plain knitted suit and black +cap was intent only upon diving, plunging, and splashing for her own +enjoyment. In another story a young lady, who came out of the sea +wearing a "... bathing suit so scanty it seemed a mere gesture flung +carelessly to the proprieties ..." described herself as a modern young +woman.[63] + + [63] JANE PRIDE, "Pick-up," _Delineator_ (May 1927), vol. 110, no. 5, + p. 15. + +In the early twenties advertisements capitalized on the functional +characteristics of swimming suits. A 1923 advertisement declared: + + No! No! Not a bathing suit! No! The Wil Wite is a swimming suit. + The difference is great--very great. A bathing suit is something + in which to "Sun" oneself and wear on the beach. A swimming suit + is a garment made expressly for those who swim. It is free from + frills and furbelows. It follows the form with the same + sincerity that a neat silk stocking clings to a trim ankle. It + fits when dry or wet ... it is a real swimming suit.[64] + + [64] _Harper's Bazar_ (June 1923), 56th year, no. 2528, p. 5. + +The knitted swimming suit which achieved dominance over the bathing suit +in the 1920s was similar to its earlier version except that both the +armhole and the neckline were lower. This made it possible to put on the +suit without unbuttoning one of the straps at the shoulder--a feature +that was omitted in this newer style. Sometimes a sash was looped +loosely around the waist; a geometrically shaped monogram provided a +smart decoration. The affluent swimmer could distinguish herself from +the masses by wearing silk jersey. During the last half of this decade +women coquettishly adopted a man's swimming suit, consisting of a +striped sleeveless jersey shirt with dark colored trunks and a white +belt. + +[Illustration: Figure 17.--BATHING SHOES, 1910. (Smithsonian photo +P-65417.)] + +Perhaps the last stand for the bathing dress was the appearance of the +"dressmaker suit" toward the end of the 1920s and on into the early +1930s. The neck and shoulder line copied those of currently fashionable +evening dresses, with a parallel treatment of the skirt, which was +shortened to end just below the hips. This suit was worn by women +reluctant to brave the revealingly unadorned but popular swimming suit. + +A depilatory advertisement took advantage of the increasing +"stockingless vogue" and explained that "Women who love swimming for the +sake of the sport, find stockings a great hindrance to their +enjoyment."[65] By the end of the twenties, the stocking for bathing +and swimming had become an article of the past. + + [65] _Delineator_ (June 1923), vol. 102, no. 6, p. 95. + +Although women were accepted in athletics and had achieved a generally +wider role in public life, white, untanned skin was still the ideal in +the 1920s. Thus sunproof creams, beach coats, and beach umbrellas were +still important. + +According to the well-known "trickle-down" theory of fashion, styles of +dress first become fashionable among the socially elite and wealthy and +are then, in time, emulated by those at lower socio-economic levels. The +knitted swimming suit, however, entered the fashion pages by a different +route. It had its insignificant start with the skirtless bifurcated +garments of the late 1860s. Going against popular opinion, some women +did swim. They violated prevalent standards of modesty by continuing to +wear a functional suit. Gradually the demand grew. A plain, utilitarian +garment was needed; pressure increased. Thus, by the 1920s the swimming +suit prevailed, complimenting the image of the newly emancipated "modern +woman." + + +SWIM SUIT INDUSTRY + +Along with the increased popularity of swimming and the appearance of +the knitted swimming suit we note the rapid development of the +ready-to-wear swim suit industry. During the last half of the 19th +century women frequently made their own bathing dresses with the aid of +paper pattern supplements that appeared in women's magazines of the +period. Dressmakers also may have used these patterns to outfit their +clients for their summer excursions. On the other hand, ladies in the +large cities could purchase bathing dresses at furnishing stores or rent +them at the large public beaches. A small advertisement in _Harper's +Bazar_, August 9, 1873, announced that in addition to gauze undershirts, +linen drawers, collars and cuffs, Union Adams & Co. of New York had +bathing dresses for sale. The notice is noteworthy when one considers +that the ready-to-wear clothing industry and the field of advertising +were in their infancy. + +With the increased popularity of the knitted suit, knitting mills +included men's and women's swimming apparel in their more prosaic lines +of underwear and sweaters. Many companies advertised the new product, +steadily increasing their range until the inevitable occurred. In 1921 a +national advertising campaign for swimming suits was initiated by +Jantzen, a hitherto obscure knitting mill whose production had been +limited to sweaters, woolen hosiery, and jackets for Chinese workmen. +Capitalizing on the growing interest in swimming, Jantzen prominently +advertised swimming suits instead of bathing dresses. The retail stores +selling these suits advertised locally, but national advertising became +the domain of the manufacturers, educating the public to associate +certain positive qualities with their names. + +To the delight of the swim suit industry, swimming was more than a +passing vogue. In 1934, a National Recreation Association study on the +use of leisure time found that among ninety-four free-time activities +swimming was second only to movies in popularity.[66] Although the +number of swimmers was increasing, competition caused the swim suit +industry to take a new approach. Manufacturers attempted to increase the +volume of sales through advertising by emphasizing style. In 1927 one +company advertised a national appeal to woman's vanity by declaring that +beach _uniforms_ were out and that beach _styles_ were in. + + [66] _The Leisure Hours of 5,000 People; a Report of a Study of + Leisure Time Activities and Desires_ (New York, National + Recreation Assoc., 1934). + +It was a general characteristic of the 1930s that swimming suits covered +less of the bather. The attached trunks of the swimming suit no longer +extended down the leg but it survived unseen beneath the vestigial +remains of a skirt. + +The diminishing coverage of the swim suit was also related to a changing +attitude toward sun exposure. For years women had protected their +delicate skin to prevent any unladylike, healthy appearance. The barrier +against a lady having a tan deteriorated as women became accepted into +athletic activities. By 1930, women eagerly sought a sun tan. Not only +were there lotions to help the neophyte sun-worshiper acquire a rich +even tan, but creams were available for the impatient who wished an +instant tan. In line with this trend, swim suit manufacturers and +sellers promoted and sold low sun-back or California styles, halter +necks, and cut-out sections that exposed various portions of the +midriff. The favorite suit, however, was the form-fitting maillot of +wool jersey with no skirt. + +In the early 1930s, the textile trade journals applauded the increasing +stress on styling as a means of encouraging the consumer to buy a new +suit rather than to use "last year's." Stylishness was introduced into +knitted suits through the use of a greater range of solid colors. +Parti-colored suits, with stripes and slashes of a second or even a +third color, were also featured (fig. 18). Knitting mills were pressed +to introduce novelty effects such as mesh, waffle motifs, and lace +patterns in knitted fabrics. + +[Illustration: Figure 18. ONE-PIECE SWIMMING SUITS OF KNITTED WOOL, +1930. (_Courtesy of Cole of California._)] + +The insistent emphasis on novelty encouraged the development of such +items as all-rubber swimming suits with embossed surfaces simulating +knitted textiles. Although this innovation was not successful, because +the suits were clammy and easily torn, rubber did find a definite use in +swimming suits with the introduction of Lastex--a yarn made with a core +of rubber wrapped by a fine thread of another fiber. The following +advertisement for swimming suits made with Lastex best explains why this +important innovation is still valued by the industry today: + + There's no wrinkle, no bag, no sag, even under the most ruthless + sun! No other human device can even approximate that utter + freedom, that perfection of fit, at rest or in motion, that airy + but strictly legal sense of wearing nothing at all. There is no + substitute for this elastic yarn, which imparts lasting + elasticity to any fabric.[67] + + [67] _Harper's Bazaar_ (June 1934), 68th year, no. 2660, p. 9. + +Having exhausted the novelty effects of knitted swim suits, women in the +late 1930s began to respond eagerly to the wide range of decorative +possibilities found in woven fabrics. Cotton and the relatively new +man-made fibers such as Celanese acetate and Dupont rayon were used in +fabrics such as ginghams, chambrays, piques, and featherweight elastic +satins. To the pleasure of the fashion editors, who claimed to be +anxious for some relief from the nudity of the maillot, suits of woven +fabrics were made with flared skirts. These had knitted linings of +cotton, acetate, or wool which satisfied any taste as to warmth or +coolness on the beach. The belief was prevalent that a wool swimming +suit was needed for warmth. In the 1940s the two-piece, bare-midriff +suit with tight shorts or flared skirt was a popular and logical +development from the earlier suits with cut-out sections around the +midriff. The more extreme French bikini, however, was not adopted by +American women when it was first introduced in the 1940s. + +By the end of the forties the one-piece swimming suit staged a comeback +with a slight variation: the new suits were structurally sculptured to +mold, control, and stay put while swimming or sunning. They were the +product of ingenious engineering, inside and out. The use of shirring +and skillful cutting and handling of fabric focused attention on the +bust line, while the frequent use of Lastex tended to streamline the +hips like a girdle. Inside, the careful use of wire and plastic boning +permitted many of these suits to assume a shape of their own and even to +be worn without straps. + +A short-lived revival of the covered-up look appeared in the fashion +pages in 1954 but, unlike the suits with covered arms and neck of the +previous century, these suits drew attention to the parts of the body +that were covered. The fate of this unsuccessful novelty is a good +illustration of the fact that, ultimately, the buyer has the final word +in the volatile field of feminine fashion. The swim suit manufacturers +apparently misinterpreted the American woman's readiness to discard the +more revealing two-piece suit in favor of an altered form of the +maillot. Always ready with novelties to make last year's suit obsolete, +the manufacturers tried to encourage women into a more extreme +covered-up look. Despite the power of national advertising women were +unwilling to go back in time. The female beach-goer and sun-worshiper +opposed a suit that might interfere with the tanning process. + +By 1960, the production of swim suits had become a big business with +mass distribution and mass markets. Expanded world-wide transportation +facilities and increased leisure and affluence in the United States +created a demand for midwinter vacation clothing for use in warmer +climates, and the manufacturing of swim suits became a year-round +undertaking, producing 14,728 million knitted and woven suits in +women's, misses, and junior sizes in 1960.[68] + + [68] Compiled from "Production of Selected Items of Knit Outerwear and + Swimwear; 1960-1961," _Apparel Survey 1961_ (1962), series + M23A(61)-2, p. 14. + + + + +Conclusions + + +The earliest bathing dress for women in the United States may have been +an old smock or shift, followed by a bathing gown based on the shift or +chemise. Although women's bathing and swimming costume achieved an +identity of its own during the 19th century, the evolution of this garb +followed certain innovations in women's underclothing, namely, drawers +in the first half of the 19th century, the "combination" of the late +1870s, and the brassiere and panties of the 1930s. The greatest number +of minor style changes, however, were direct reflections of fashions in +street dress. The rising hemline and, at times, the discarding of a +skirt during periods when women wore long dresses for other activities +can be attributed to changes caused by the functional requirements of +bathing and swimming; the shortening of sleeves and trousers in the last +quarter of the 19th century were also functional improvements. The +benefits of the shorter trousers, however, were minimized when modesty +required women to cover their exposed legs with stockings. + +Swimming suits have been considered a 20th century innovation; in fact +one corporation is under the impression that a member of their staff was +responsible for the first use of the term "swimming suit" early in the +century. The findings presented in this paper show that some women were +wearing "swimming suits" that were distinctly different from bathing +dresses as early as the 1870s and that both co-existed for some 50 +years. Bathing dresses disappeared in the 1920s with the widespread +acceptance of its functional counterpart; "bathing suit" no longer +referred to a special type of costume but became interchangeable with +the term "swimming suit." + +The insistent trend toward more functional costume reached its ultimate +conclusion with the refinements of the knitted swimming suit in the +1930s. Subsequent changes have not improved upon the functional design +of this classic suit. In many instances these variations have been +merely to satisfy the feminine desire for distinctive apparel and the +industry's need for perishable fashions. Female competitive swimmers +have continued to wear the simple knitted suit--now of nylon rather than +wool. + +The changes since the 1930s have shown a trend toward diminution in the +coverage of the swimming suit. One cannot be certain what this means for +the future, but it is unlikely that either the swim suit industry or +standards of modesty of the near future will permit a total elimination +of swimming costume. We can be assured, however, that so long as women +swim, they will not repeat history by swathing themselves with yards of +fabric. + + +U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1969 + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Women's Bathing and Swimming Costume +in the United States, by Claudia B. Kidwell + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN'S BATHING AND SWIMMING *** + +***** This file should be named 37586.txt or 37586.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/5/8/37586/ + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Harry Lame and +the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/37586.zip b/37586.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f91a60d --- /dev/null +++ b/37586.zip diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2d5e23e --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #37586 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/37586) |
