diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:06:59 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:06:59 -0700 |
| commit | fc9495ec54d0e3ad36c3524c4aa2837b0efac30e (patch) | |
| tree | 950d5b205d3495fd7664bdfa67a866241fe3afbf | |
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-8.txt | 2809 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-8.zip | bin | 0 -> 51406 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 1568852 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/37004-h.htm | 2899 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing21.jpg | bin | 0 -> 83126 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing27.jpg | bin | 0 -> 71635 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing59.jpg | bin | 0 -> 34449 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing69.jpg | bin | 0 -> 51848 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing71a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 56053 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing71b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 52388 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing75.jpg | bin | 0 -> 82183 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing76.jpg | bin | 0 -> 48401 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing77a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 9728 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing77b.jpg | bin | 0 -> 15207 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing77c.jpg | bin | 0 -> 6596 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing90.jpg | bin | 0 -> 141472 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/facing90_tmb.jpg | bin | 0 -> 54265 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/frontis.jpg | bin | 0 -> 69070 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page44.jpg | bin | 0 -> 142525 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page44_tmb.jpg | bin | 0 -> 78654 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page79.jpg | bin | 0 -> 112363 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page79_tmb.jpg | bin | 0 -> 105431 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page8.jpg | bin | 0 -> 84409 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page89.jpg | bin | 0 -> 195382 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page89_tmb.jpg | bin | 0 -> 116715 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004-h/images/page8_tmb.jpg | bin | 0 -> 59652 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004.txt | 2809 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 37004.zip | bin | 0 -> 51386 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 |
31 files changed, 8533 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/37004-8.txt b/37004-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3afbebc --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2809 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Three Accounts of Peterloo, by +Edward Stanley and William Jolliffe and John Benjamin Smith + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Three Accounts of Peterloo + By Eyewitnesses Bishop Stanley, Lord Hylton, John Benjamin + Smith with Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the Trial + +Author: Edward Stanley + William Jolliffe + John Benjamin Smith + +Editor: F. A. Bruton + +Release Date: August 7, 2011 [EBook #37004] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THREE ACCOUNTS OF PETERLOO *** + + + + +Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images +generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian +Libraries.) + + + + + + + + + + PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER + + HISTORICAL SERIES + No. XXXIX. + + THREE ACCOUNTS OF + PETERLOO. + + + + + Published by the University of Manchester at + THE UNIVERSITY PRESS (H. M. MCKECHNIE, M.A., Secretary) + 12 LIME GROVE, OXFORD ROAD, MANCHESTER + + LONGMANS, GREEN & CO. + + LONDON: + 39 Paternoster Row, E.C.4 + + NEW YORK: + 443-449 Fourth Avenue and Thirtieth Street + + BOMBAY: + 336 Hornby Road + + CALCUTTA: + 6 Old Court House Street + + MADRAS: + 167 Mount Road + + + + +[Illustration: BISHOP STANLEY 1779-1849 + +_From a Print lent by Lord Sheffield_ + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_Frontispiece_] + + + + + Three Accounts + OF + Peterloo + + BY EYEWITNESSES + + BISHOP STANLEY + LORD HYLTON + JOHN BENJAMIN SMITH + + with + + Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the Trial + + + Edited by F. A. BRUTON, M.A., Litt.D + of the Manchester Grammar School + + + MANCHESTER: + AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS + + LONGMANS, GREEN & CO. + LONDON, NEW YORK, BOMBAY, etc. + 1921 + + + + +PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER + +No. CXL. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + PAGE + + Introduction vii + + Bishop Stanley 1 + + Stanley's Account of Peterloo 10 + + Stanley's Evidence at the Trial in 1822 24 + + Sir William Jolliffe, afterwards Lord Hylton 45 + + Lieutenant Jolliffe's Account of Peterloo 48 + + John Benjamin Smith 59 + + Mr. J. B. Smith's Account of Peterloo 62 + + + APPENDIX A 75 + Some Relics of Peterloo:-- + 1. A Banner carried at Peterloo. + 2. Bamford's Cottage at Middleton. + 3. Constables' Staves. + 4. Head of Flagstaff. + 5. Hussar's Plume. + 6. Account-Book of the Relief Committee. + 7. Account-Book recording amounts raised + for the relief of Special Constables + and their families. + + APPENDIX B 81 + 1. Note on the Casualties at Peterloo. + 2. Presence of women and children at Peterloo. + 3. Some gleanings from the Scrap-Books. + 4. Explanation of the Contemporary Plan and + Picture of Peterloo. + + + + +ILLUSTRATIONS. + + + PAGE + + Portrait of Bishop Stanley _Frontispiece_ + + Stanley's Plan of Peterloo 8 + + Nadin, the Deputy Constable _Facing_ 21 + + "Orator Hunt" " 27 + + Plan of Peterloo, compiled from the + contemporary Plans and modern Street Maps 44 + + Portrait of Mr. John Benjamin Smith _Facing_ 59 + + The Hunt Memorial at the Manchester Reform + Club " 69 + + The Peterloo Medal " 71 + + The Banner carried at Peterloo by the + Middleton Contingent " 75 + + Samuel Bamford's Cottage at Middleton " 76 + + Three Relics picked up on the Field of Peterloo " 77 + + A Page of the Relief Committee's Account Book 79 + + Plan of Peterloo published with the Report of + the Trial in 1822 89 + + Wroe's Picture of Peterloo, showing the + Manchester Yeomanry riding for the Hustings _Facing_ 90 + + + + +INTRODUCTION. + + +Of the three accounts of the Tragedy of Peterloo given here, two (the +first and third) have never been published before. The second appeared in +the "Life of Lord Sidmouth" in 1847. All three, written with care and +judgment, by men who afterwards rose to eminence, form a valuable +contribution to the understanding of an event, the accounts of which have +been for the most part distorted and misleading. Moreover, as each of the +three writers deals with a different phase of the day's happenings, the +accounts complement one another. + +The Editor had already arranged for the publication of the first, when he +received the following letter from Lord Sheffield, dated Penrhos, +Holyhead, August 21st, 1919:-- + + "It is many years since I had the copy of the Rev. E. Stanley's + report, and no doubt it was one of the lithographed copies you + mention. + + I think it would be well if it were published, along with the evidence + to which you refer. I also think the Plan, of which you speak, should + be added, and the reports of Jolliffe and J. B. Smith." + +Lord Sheffield supported his suggestion by enclosing a cheque towards the +cost of printing, and this made easy the publication of the whole. Lord +Sheffield also kindly lent the portrait of Bishop Stanley, which appears +as the Frontispiece. + +Acknowledgments are due, besides: (1) to Mr. Henry Guppy, M.A., for +permission to use the blocks of Wroe's picture of Peterloo, and the Plan +from the "Story of Peterloo" in the Bulletin of the John Rylands Library +for October, 1919; and to copy a page of the Account-book of the Relief +Committee; (2) to Lady Durning Lawrence, who (with the late Mr. C. W. +Sutton, M.A.) gave permission to print the Extract from the Reminiscences +of Mr. J. B. Smith, and to reproduce his portrait; (3) to Mr. W. Marcroft +of Southport; and Messrs. Hirst & Rennie of Oldham, for the loan of the +blocks of "Orator Hunt," the "Hunt Memorial," and the "Peterloo Medal"; +(4) to Mr. John Murray for leave to reprint Lieutenant Jolliffe's letter; +(5) to Mr. W. W. Manfield, for the loan of the three Relics of Peterloo; +and (6) to Mr. R. H. Fletcher, amateur photographer, of Eccles, for +photographing the relics, etc. + +F. A. B. + + + + +Three Accounts of Peterloo + +BISHOP STANLEY + + +The Rev. Edward Stanley (1779-1849) was the second son of Sir J. T. +Stanley, the Sixth Baronet, and Margaret Owen, of Penrhos, Anglesey. His +elder brother was the first Baron Stanley of Alderley. As a boy, he had a +natural inclination for the sea, but this was not encouraged. For +thirty-two years he was Rector of Alderley, in Cheshire. While making +himself beloved as a Parish Priest, he found time for many scientific and +other interests. His _Familiar History of Birds_ is a standard work; he +advocated, and assisted in, the teaching of Science and Temperance at +Alderley; and he became one of the first Presidents of the Manchester +Statistical Society. Though he declined the See of Manchester, when it was +offered him, he accepted from Lord Melbourne, in 1837, the Bishopric of +Norwich, and introduced a number of reforms into that diocese. A short +memoir of him was written by his son, the famous Dean of Westminster. + +At the date of Peterloo, a number of clergymen sat on the Bench of +Magistrates for Lancashire and Cheshire, but Stanley stated clearly at the +Trial that he was not a Magistrate. He was then forty years of age, and +Rector of Alderley, and in his evidence he was careful to say that his +narrative of Peterloo was compiled about two months after the event, for +private circulation among his friends, and had never been published. It is +clear that a copy was in the hands of Counsel who cross-examined him at +the Trial in 1822. The manuscript is very neatly written (I should +conjecture by Stanley himself) on nine large quarto pages, the plan being +drawn by the same hand, and the notes given at the end. I have thought it +more convenient for the reader to have the notes thrown to the foot of the +respective pages. The manuscript was lithographed, in 1819, by the +Lithographic Press, Westminster, and entered at Stationers' Hall. I found +on enquiry that there was one copy in the Manuscript Department of the +British Museum (Add. MSS., 30142, ff. 78-83). It is addressed to +Major-Gen. Sir Robert Wilson, and sealed with the Stanley crest. The +authorship was not known, and the Keeper of the MSS. was glad to be able +to add this to the document as the result of my communication. In the +Printed Book Department of the British Museum there is a second copy, +catalogued under Manchester, with press-mark 8133i. There is no trace of +Stanley's MS. in the Public Records Office. I can find no other copy but +the one at the Manchester Reference Library, which is in excellent +preservation, and has recently been rebound. Mr. J. C. Hobhouse quoted +from Stanley's narrative once in a speech in the House of Commons. +Speaking on May 19th, 1821, in support of a Petition for an enquiry as to +the outrage at Manchester, Mr. Hobhouse, following Sir Francis Burdett, +said: "The Rev. Mr. Stanley, who watched from a room above the +magistrates, saw no stones or sticks used, though if any stone larger than +a pebble had been thrown, he must have seen it." I have not found any +other reference to the narrative except that made by Counsel at the Trial, +and that is recorded in the Evidence which follows. + + * * * * * + +Three notes may find a place here. The first two refer to points mentioned +by Stanley:-- + +1. Pigot and Dean's _Manchester Directory_ for 1819 mentions: + + (_a_) Edmund Buxton, Builder, &c., No. 6, Mount Street, Dickinson + Street. + + (_b_) Thomas & Matthew Pickford & Co., Carriers, Oxford Street. + +I do not find Mr. Buxton's "shop," which is mentioned by Stanley; nor are +Pickfords described as "timber merchants," though timber may easily have +been stacked in their yard. + +Stanley's movements on reaching Manchester are not, at a first reading, +quite clear. Riding in from Alderley, he seems to have approached by way +of Oxford Road, passing (as he tells us) the Manchester Yeomanry, posted +at Pickford's yard. At twelve o'clock, he turned up Mosley Street (very +likely to avoid the crowd which was already filling the Square) and in +Mosley Street he met the contingent of Reformers coming from Ashton. He +then proceeded to Mr. Buxton's _shop_, which seems to have been near the +lower end of Deansgate. Not finding Mr. Buxton there, he was directed to +his _residence_ in Mount Street. The shortest way to Mount Street from +Alport would have taken him through the crowd. He therefore approached +Mount Street "by a circuitous route to avoid the meeting" (possibly by +Fleet Street and Lower Mosley Street, the route afterwards taken by the +Hussars), and met Mr. Buxton on the steps of his house. + +Stanley evidently knew little of Manchester. He confesses in his narrative +that he had not been in St. Peter's field before or since the tragedy; in +his evidence he said: "I know no street," and stated that he could not +locate the Friends' Meeting-house. + +2. Stanley's estimate of a hundred yards, as the distance from the +hustings to Mr. Buxton's house can be demonstrated to-day to be almost +exactly correct. This is only one of many points in his narrative which +show what a shrewd, quick, and accurate observer he was. When Mr. Hulton +was asked, at the Trial, to estimate the same distance, he conjectured +four hundred yards, and this was actually quoted as the distance in one of +the standard histories of the period. + +For the rest, it seems better to leave Stanley's extremely lucid account +to speak for itself. To annotate it in detail would be to spoil its +completeness. As has been stated above, each observer witnessed the scene +from his own stand-point. A complete picture can only be obtained by +forming a mosaic of the various reports. Stanley's narrative is that of an +outsider, who came upon the scene unexpectedly, and watched the whole with +the eye of a statesman and a statistician. Lieutenant Jolliffe's account +gives the view of a young soldier, a stranger to Manchester, who rode in +the charge of the Hussars, and afterwards took part with them in the +patrol of the town. Mr. J. B. Smith speaks from the point of view of a +Manchester business man, familiar with the civic and economic conditions +that led to the catastrophe, and his narrative reaches a few days beyond +the tragedy itself. Samuel Bamford's account--too well-known to need +repetition here--was written from the stand-point of a local weaver, who +had already suffered for his outspoken advocacy of Parliamentary Reform, +had a large share in organising the Peterloo meeting, and served a term of +imprisonment for his share in the proceedings. An attempt to dovetail +these and other Reports into a continuous narrative has already been made +in _The Story of Peterloo_ (Rylands Library Lectures, 1919.). + +3. Stanley's Evidence at the Trial, which is here printed immediately +after his connected narrative, has been taken from McDonnell's _State +Trials_, supplemented--where passages are omitted by McDonnell--by +Farquharson's verbatim report, issued by the Defence after the Trial. As a +matter of fact McDonnell made use of Farquharson's version. + + * * * * * + +The portrait of Bishop Stanley which appears here is from a print kindly +lent for the purpose by Lord Sheffield. + + + + +Stanley's Notes attached to his Plan + + +Never having seen St. Peter's fields before or since, I cannot pretend to +speak accurately as to distance, etc. I should, at a guess, state the +distance from the hustings to Mr. Buxton's house to be about a hundred +yards, which may serve as a general scale to the rest of the plan. + + +KEY TO STANLEY'S PLAN. + +1. The hustings. The arrow shows the direction in which the orators +addressed the mob, the great majority being in front: F, F, F. + +2. The Barouche in which Hunt arrived, the line from it showing its +entrance and approach. + +3. The spot on which the Manchester Yeomanry Cavalry halted previous to +their charge; the dotted lines in front showing the direction of their +charge on attacking the hustings. + + +[Illustration: Stanley's Plan] + + +4. On this spot the woman alluded to in the account (p. 15) was wounded +and remained apparently dead, till removed at the conclusion of the +business. + +5. Here the 15th Dragoons paused for a few moments before they proceeded +in the direction marked by the dotted line. + +6. The Cheshire Cavalry; my attention was so much taken up with the +proceedings of the Manchester Yeomanry Cavalry, etc., and the dispersion +in front of the hustings, that I cannot speak accurately as to their +subsequent movements. + +7, 7, 7. The band of special constables, _apparently_ surrounding the +hustings. + +8, 8, 8. The mob in dense mass; their banners displayed in different +parts, as at x, x. + +9, 9, 9. A space comparatively vacant; partially occupied by stragglers; +the mob condensing near the hustings for the purpose of seeing and +hearing. + +10, 10, 10. Raised ground on which many spectators had taken a position; a +commotion amongst them first announced the approach of the cavalry; their +elevated situation commanding a more extensive view. + + + + +Bishop Stanley's Account of Peterloo + + +Soon after one o'clock on the 16th of August, I went to call on Mr. +Buxton, with whom I had some private business. I was directed to his house +overlooking St. Peter's field, where I unexpectedly found the magistrates +assembled.[1] I went up to their room, and remained there seven or eight +minutes. Hunt was not then arrived; a murmur running through the crowd +prepared us for his approach; a numerous vanguard preceded him, and in a +few moments the Barouche appeared in which he sat with his coadjutors, +male and female; a tremendous shout instantly welcomed him; he proceeded +slowly towards the hustings. On approaching the knot of constables the +carriage stopped a short time, I conceive from the difficulty of making +way through a band of men who were little inclined to fall back for his +admission. The Barouche at length attained its position close to the +hustings, and the speakers stepped forth, the female--as far as I can +recollect--still remaining on the driver's seat with a banner in her hand. +I then left the magistrates and went to a room immediately above them, +commanding a bird's-eye view of the whole area, in which every movement +and every object was distinctly visible. In the centre were the hustings +surrounded _to all appearance_[2] by a numerous body of constables, +easily distinguished by their respectable dress, staves of office, and +hats _on_; the elevation of the hustings of course eclipsed a portion of +the space immediately beyond them, so as to prevent my seeing, and +consequently asserting positively, whether they were completely surrounded +by this chain of constables. The chain from this its main body was +continued in a double line, two or three deep, forming an avenue to Mr. +Buxton's house, by which _there seemed to be_ free and uninterrupted +access to and from the hustings. Had any interruption of their +communication occurred previous to the change, I think I must have +perceived it from the commanding position I occupied. A vast concourse of +people, in a close and compact mass, surrounded the hustings and +constables, pressing upon each other apparently with a view to be as near +the speakers as possible. They were, generally speaking, bare-headed, +probably for the purpose of giving those behind them a better view. +Between the outside of this mob and the sides of the area the space was +comparatively unoccupied; stragglers were indeed numerous, but not so as +to amount to anything like a crowd, or to create interruption to foot +passengers. Round the edges of the square more compact masses of people +were assembled, the greater part of whom appeared to be spectators. The +radical banners and caps of liberty were conspicuous in different parts +of the concentrated mob, stationed according to the order in which the +respective bands to which they belonged had entered the ground, and taken +up their positions. + +After the orators had ascended the hustings, a few minutes were taken up +in preparing for the business of the day, and then Hunt began his address. +I could distinctly hear his voice, but was too distant to distinguish his +words. He had not spoken above a minute or two before I heard a report in +the room that the cavalry were sent for; the messengers, we were told, +might be seen from a back window. I ran to that window from which I could +see the road leading to a timber yard (I believe) at no great distance, +where, as I entered the town, I had observed the Manchester Yeomanry +stationed. I saw three horsemen ride off, one towards the timber yard, the +others in the direction which I knew led to the cantonments of other +cavalry. + +I immediately returned to the front window, anxiously awaiting the result; +a slight commotion among a body of spectators, chiefly women, who occupied +a mound of raised, broken ground on the left, and to the rear, of the +orators, convinced me they saw something which excited their fears; many +jumped down, and they soon dispersed more rapidly. By this time the alarm +was quickly spreading, and I heard several voices exclaiming: "The +soldiers! the soldiers!"; another moment brought the cavalry into the +field on a gallop,[3] which they continued till the word was given for +halting them, about the middle of the space which I before noticed as +partially occupied by stragglers. + +They halted in great disorder, and so continued for the few minutes they +remained on that spot. This disorder was attributed by several persons in +the room to the undisciplined state of their horses, little accustomed to +act together, and probably frightened by the shout of the populace, which +greeted their arrival. Hunt had evidently seen their approach; his hand +had been pointed towards them, and it was clear from his gestures that he +was addressing the mob respecting their interference. His words, whatever +they were, excited a shout from those immediately about him, which was +re-echoed with fearful animation by the rest of the multitude. Ere that +had subsided, the cavalry, the loyal spectators, and the special +constables, cheered loudly in return, and a pause ensued of about a minute +or two. + +An officer and some few others then advanced rather in front of the troop, +formed, as I before said, in much disorder and with scarcely the semblance +of line, their sabres glistened in the air, and on they went, direct for +the hustings. At first, _i.e._, for a very few paces, their movement was +not rapid, and there was some show of an attempt to follow their officer +in regular succession, five or six abreast; but, as Mr. Francis Phillips +in his pamphlet observes, they soon "increased their speed," and with a +zeal and ardour which might naturally be expected from men acting with +delegated power against a foe by whom it is understood they had long been +insulted with taunts of cowardice, continued their course, seeming +individually to vie with each other which should be first. Some +stragglers, I have remarked, occupied the space in which they halted. On +the commencement of the charge, these fled in all directions; and I +presume escaped, with the exception of a woman who had been standing ten +or twelve yards in front; as the troop passed her body was left, to all +appearance lifeless; and there remained till the close of the business, +when, as it was no great distance from the house, I went towards her. Two +men were then in the act of raising her up; whether she was actually dead +or not I cannot say, but no symptoms of life were visible at the time I +last saw her.[4] + +As the cavalry approached the dense mass of people they used their utmost +efforts to escape: but so closely were they pressed in opposite directions +by the soldiers, the special constables, the position of the hustings, and +their own immense numbers, that immediate escape was impossible. The rapid +course of the troop was of course impeded when it came in contact with the +mob, but a passage was forced in less than a minute; so rapid indeed was +it that the guard of constables close to the hustings shared the fate of +the rest. The whole of this will be intelligible at once by a reference to +the annexed sketch. + +On their arrival at the hustings a scene of dreadful confusion ensued. The +orators fell or were forced off the scaffold in quick succession; +fortunately for them, the stage being rather elevated, they were in great +degree beyond the reach of the many swords which gleamed around them. Hunt +fell--or threw himself--among the constables, and was driven or dragged, +as fast as possible, down the avenue which communicated with the +magistrates' house; his associates were hurried after him in a similar +manner. By this time so much dust had arisen that no accurate account can +be given of what further took place at that particular spot. + +The square was now covered with the flying multitude; though still in +parts the banners and caps of liberty were surrounded by groups. The +Manchester Yeomanry had already taken possession of the hustings, when the +Cheshire Yeomanry entered on my left in excellent order, and formed in the +rear of the hustings as well as could be expected, considering the crowds +who were now pressing in all directions and filling up the space hitherto +partially occupied. + +The Fifteenth Dragoons appeared nearly at the same moment, and paused +rather than halted on our left, parallel to the row of houses. They then +pressed forward, crossing the avenue of constables, which opened to let +them through, and bent their course towards the Manchester Yeomanry. The +people were now in a state of utter rout and confusion, leaving the ground +strewed with hats and shoes, and hundreds were thrown down in the attempt +to escape. The cavalry were hurrying about in all directions, completing +the work of dispersion, which--to use the words given in Wheeler's +_Manchester Chronicle_, referred to by Mr. Francis Phillips--was effected +in so short a space of time as to appear as if done "by magic." + +I saw nothing that gave me an idea of resistance, except in one or two +spots where they showed some disinclination to abandon the banners; these +impulses, however, were but momentary, and banner after banner fell into +the hands of the military power.[5] The extent of their defence may +perhaps best be estimated by the gallant conduct, which I particularly +noticed, of a man on horseback, apparently a gentleman's servant. Unarmed +as far as I could perceive, he separated from the cavalry, and rode +directly into a compact body of people collected round a banner; a scuffle +ensued highly interesting; the banner rose and fell repeatedly, but +ultimately fell into his hands, and he galloped off with it in triumph. + +During the whole of this confusion, heightened at its close by the rattle +of some artillery[6] crossing the square, shrieks were heard in all +directions, and as the crowd of people dispersed the effects of the +conflict became visible. Some were seen bleeding on the ground and unable +to rise; others, less seriously injured but faint with the loss of blood, +were retiring slowly or leaning upon others for support. One special +constable, with a cut down his head, was brought to Mr. Buxton's house. I +saw several others in the passage, congratulating themselves on their +narrow escape, and showing the marks of sabre-cuts on their hats. I saw no +firearms, but distinctly heard four or five shots, towards the close of +the business, on the opposite side of the square, beyond the hustings; but +nobody could inform me by whom they were fired. The whole of this +extraordinary scene was the work of a few minutes. + +The rapid succession of so many important incidents in this short space of +time, the peculiar character of each depending so much on the variation of +a few instants in the detail, sufficiently accounts for the very +contradictory statements that have been given; added to which it should +be observed that no spectator on the ground could possibly form a just +and correct idea of what was passing. When below, I could not have +observed anything accurately beyond a few yards around me, and it was only +by ascending to the upper rooms of Mr. Buxton's house that I could form a +just and correct idea of almost every point which has since afforded so +much discussion and contention. + +The cavalry were now collected in different parts of the area; the centre, +but a few minutes before crowded to excess, was utterly deserted; groups +of radicals were still seen assembled on the outskirts, screening +themselves behind logs of timber or mingling with the spectators on the +pavement. The constables remained in a body in front of the house waiting +for the reappearance of Hunt, who (with his colleagues) was secured in a +small parlour opening into the passage to which I had now descended. I +believe the original intention was to send him to the New Bailey in a +carriage, but it was soon after decided that he should walk. When this was +made known it was received with shouts of approbation and "bring him out, +let the rebel walk," was heard from all quarters. At length he came forth, +and notwithstanding the blows he had received in running the gauntlet down +the avenue of constables, I thought I could perceive a smile of triumph +on his countenance. A person (Nadin, I believe) offered to take his arm, +but he drew himself back, and in a sort of whisper said: "No, no, that's +rather too good a thing," or words to that effect. He then left the house, +and I soon afterwards also went away. + + +[Illustration: JOSEPH NADIN DEPUTY-CONSTABLE OF MANCHESTER AT THE TIME OF +PETERLOO + +_From a Print at the Reference Library_ + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 21_] + + +I saw no symptoms of riot or disturbances before the meeting; the +impression on my mind was that the people were sullenly peaceful, and I +had an excellent opportunity of forming an opinion by suddenly coming in +contact with a large body from Ashton, who met me in Mosley Street, as I +entered the town.[7] They were walking at a moderate pace, six or seven +abreast, arm in arm, which enabled them to keep some sort of regularity in +their march. I was soon surrounded by them as I passed, and though my +horse showed a good deal of alarm, particularly at their band and flags, +they broke rank and offered no molestation whatever. + +As soon, however, as I had quitted Mr. Buxton's house at the conclusion of +the business, I found them in a very different state of feeling. I heard +repeated vows of revenge. "You took us unprepared, we were unarmed to-day, +and it is your day; but when we meet again the day shall be ours." How far +this declaration of being unarmed men may be relied upon, I cannot pretend +to say; I certainly saw nothing like arms either at or before the meeting; +their sticks were, as far as came under my observation, common +walking-sticks; that some, however, were armed I can have no doubt, as a +constable, when I was leaving Mr. Buxton's house, showed me a couple of +short skewers or daggers fixed in wooden handles, which he had taken in +the fray. + +I have heard from the most respectable authority that the cavalry were +assailed by stones during the short time they halted previous to their +charge. I do not wish to contradict positive assertions. What a person +_sees_ must be true. My evidence on that point can only be negative. I +certainly saw nothing of the sort, and yet my eyes were fixed most +steadily upon them, and I think that I must have seen any stone larger +than a pebble at the short distance at which I stood (from thirty to fifty +yards) and the commanding view I had. I indeed saw no missile weapons used +throughout the whole transaction, but as I have before stated, the dust +at the hustings soon partially obscured everything that took place near +that particular spot; but no doubt the people defended themselves to the +best of their power, as it was absolutely impossible for them to get away +and give the cavalry a clear passage till the outer part of the mob had +fallen back. No blame can be fairly attributed to the soldiers for +wounding the constables as well as the radicals, since the chief +distinguishing mark (the former being covered and the latter uncovered) +soon ceased to exist; every man for obvious reasons covering himself in +haste the moment the dispersion commenced. + +Such are the leading features of this event, to which I can speak +positively; comments and opinions I have avoided as much as possible, my +object being to give a clear and impartial account of facts, which whether +for or against the adopted conclusions of either party must speak for +themselves. + + + + +The Evidence of The Rev. Edward Stanley + + +in the Trial of an action for assault, brought by Thomas Redford against +Hugh Hornby Birley and others, members of the Manchester Yeomanry, before +Mr. Justice Holroyd and a Special Jury, at Lancaster on the 4th, 5th, 6th, +7th, 8th, and 9th of April, 1822. + + +_Second day of the Trial._ + +The Rev. EDWARD STANLEY examined by Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE (_Counsel for +the Plaintiff_). + +You, I believe, are the Rector of Alderley, in Cheshire?--I am. + +Brother to Sir Thomas Stanley?--Brother to Sir John Stanley. + +On the 16th of August, 1819, had you any business with Mr. Buxton?--I had. + +How far do you live from Manchester?--Between fifteen and sixteen miles. + +You came into Manchester on the morning; about what time?--As near twelve +o'clock as possible I entered Mosley Street. + +In your passage up Mosley Street, did you meet with any number of +people?--I did. + +Walking?--Walking. + +In what manner?--They were coming down the street, walking in a +procession, six, or seven, or eight abreast, and arm in arm. + +Were you on horseback?--I was. + +Was there any interruption to your passage?--No. Should I explain? + +Tell us the reason?--As I was going down the street, some persons on the +pavement desired me-- + +I do not wish to know what the persons on the pavement desired you to do; +I do not wish you to tell us the conversation, but simply to relate what +happened?--I passed through them. + +By their opening to give you way?--Certainly. + +Did you go on that day to Mr. Buxton's house, and what time did you get +there? I got to Mr. Buxton's house, I should think, a quarter after one. + +Did you go into a room there where the magistrates were assembled?--I did. + +How long did you remain there?--I should think about from eight to ten +minutes. + +During the time you were in the room, did Mr. Hunt arrive on the +ground?--He was called Mr. Hunt; he was in a barouche. + +And a multitude accompanying him?--A vast multitude. + +I believe there was a cheer given by the populace at the time when he did +arrive?--A tremendous shout. + +Did you remain in the room or did you go elsewhere?--I did not remain +there; I went into the room above it. + +Were there any other persons in the room besides you?--Several. + +Did you see the Manchester Yeomanry come on to the ground?--I did. + +And form in front of Mr. Buxton's house?--They formed with their left +flank a little to the right of the special constables, and a few yards to +the right of Mr. Buxton's house. + +You say to the left of the line of special constables?--Their left flank +was on the right of Mr. Buxton's house. + +You saw the line of constables; where did it extend to?--It extended from +the door of Mr. Buxton's house, apparently up to the hustings. + +Was there more than one line of constables?--There were two lines of +constables. + +What was the interval between them?--Near Mr. Buxton's house and the mob, +three or four feet. + + +[Illustration: "ORATOR" HUNT, 1773-1835 CHAIRMAN OF THE PETERLOO MEETING + +_To face page 27_] + + +Afterwards, the line was closed by the pressure of the mob, expanding +again when they came near the hustings?--According to my observation; to +the best of my judgment; such is the impression on my mind. + +Of course you saw the people collected?--Certainly. + +In a large mass?--In a very large mass. + +What was it enabled you to distinguish the special constables from the +rest?--They were superior-dressed people, had their hats on, and their +staffs were constantly appearing, and they were nearer the hustings. + +And the people round the hustings had their hats off?--My general +impression is, all, to speak accurately. + +The people on this side of the area of St. Peter's field were not so +numerous?--There were more stragglers, and no crowd. + +You saw colours and caps of liberty on the ground?--I did. + +What number of either the one or the other? Perhaps you do not distinctly +recollect?--I cannot say. + +You heard Mr. Hunt speak?--No, I could just hear his voice, but I was not +able to distinguish what he said. + +How long had that taken place before you saw the cavalry advance towards +the hustings?--From their halt, I should think three minutes. + +From the time you heard Mr. Hunt?--Not from the time I heard Mr. Hunt; he +was speaking before I arrived. + +Then from the time of the halt?--Two or three minutes. + +When you saw them advance towards the hustings, with what speed did they +go?--They were formed in an irregular mass. Those on the left advanced in +some sort of order. They went on at first, for a few paces, at no very +quick pace; but they soon increased their speed, till it became a sort of +rush or race amongst them all towards the hustings. + +Did you observe the effect that this had upon the people, whether it +caused them to disperse or not?--They could not disperse instantly. + +But on the outside of them?--On the right, in front of the hustings, they +immediately began to melt away, as it were, as far as they could at the +extreme. + +The outward edge of the meeting?--The outward edge, in front of the +hustings. + +Did you observe the cavalry when they got first among the thick part of +the meeting?--Their speed was diminished as soon as they came in contact +with the dense mob. + +Well?--But they worked their way to the hustings still, as fast, under +existing circumstances, as they could. + +From the place in which you were, I believe you had a very commanding view +of the hustings?--I looked down upon it like a map. + +I understood you, you had also been in a room below that, and looked +through there?--I had. + +Which, in your opinion, was the better place for a correct observation of +what passed after the meeting?--Decidedly, the highest room. + +Did you watch the advance of the cavalry from their place up to the +hustings?--I did. + +Did you see either sticks, or stones, or anything of the kind used against +the cavalry in their advance up to the hustings?--Certainly not. + +Did you see any resistance whatever to the cavalry, except the thickness +of the meeting?--None. + +Do I understand you to say you saw them surround the hustings, or +not?--Surround I could not say, for the other side of the hustings, of +course, was partially eclipsed by the people upon it. + +But you saw them encircle part?--Encircle part. + +Did you see what was done when they got there?--Yes. + +Will you tell us what it was that you saw done?--I saw the swords up and +down, the orators tumbled or thrown over, and the mob dispersed. + +In your judgment, what length of time elapsed between the cavalry first +setting off into the meeting and the time of their complete +dispersion?--Starting from their halt to the complete dispersion of the +meeting, I should think from three to five minutes; but I cannot speak to +a minute. + +In your judgment it took from three to five minutes? You did not observe +it by a watch?--No. + +Did you see any other troops come into the field?--I did. + +What were they?-- + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: He says he saw what?-- + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Other troops come into the field. + +When was it that you saw them come into the field?--When the mob around +the hustings were dispersing rapidly, and I think Mr. Hunt was taken off. + +What were those troops that you saw come into the ground then?--First came +in, on the left of Mr. Buxton's row of houses, the Cheshire Yeomanry, who +filed to the left. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: You mean to the left, looking from the house, +then?--From the house. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Where did the Cheshire Yeomanry take up their +position when they came on the ground?--They took up their position in the +rear of the hustings, rather in advance, I think, of some mounds of earth. + +Do you know Windmill Street?--I know no street. + +You don't know its name?--I know no name. + +You say near a rising ground?--There is a sort of little elevated bank or +ground. + +Had the multitude from that part been dispersed?--The multitude in the +rear were pretty much as they had been at first. I think they were +dispersing, but not so rapidly. + +Do you mean in the rear of the cavalry?--In the rear of the hustings. + +The Cheshire Yeomanry's position was in the rear of the hustings?--Part +near amongst these people. + +What other troops beside the Cheshire Yeomanry did you see come on to the +ground?--Soon after the Cheshire Yeomanry had come in and taken their +position, a troop of Dragoons, I think the 15th, came in under the windows +of Mr. Buxton's house. + +You say you think they were the 15th Hussars?--They were called the 15th +Dragoons; they had Waterloo medals. + +Where did they take up their position?-- + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: "Near Mr. Buxton's house," he said. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Did they continue there?--They halted or paused +for a moment or so, a little to the left of Mr. Buxton's house, a very +little to the left, almost in front, inclining to the left. + +What others did you see come on the ground, besides them and the Cheshire +Yeomanry?--At the close of the business I saw some artillery driving +through the place. + +Was there any other besides those that you saw take up any position on the +ground?--None, on the ground. + +At this time, was the whole of the multitude dispersed?--It was dispersing +most rapidly; I may say dispersed, except in partial spots. + +After leaving the hustings, to which part of the field did the Manchester +Yeomanry go?--To all parts. I think more behind the hustings, and on the +right; they did not come back to me so much. + +Do you know the Quakers' meeting-house?--I have heard where it is since; +then I did not know. + +Was it that way that they went?--If you could point out, in a plan, the +Quakers' meeting-house, I could tell you if they went that road. + +There is the Quakers' meeting-house, you will see written on the +plan?--Some went that way. + +Some of the people, too, dispersed in that direction, did they?--The +people dispersed in every direction. + +I am not sure whether I asked you before, whether from your situation in +this window, if any stones, or brickbats, or sticks, had been raised +against the cavalry, on their way to the hustings, you must have seen +it?--I think I must have seen it. + + +Cross-examined by Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: + +Will you venture to swear, Mr. Stanley, that no stones nor brickbats would +be thrown during the advance of the cavalry towards the hustings, without +your perceiving it?--I can only venture to say that I saw none. + +I believe you have favoured the public with an account of this +transaction?--No, I have not. + +You printed or wrote something?--It was in circulation among my friends. I +wrote something which was never published. + +There was a document, written by you, circulated among your +friends?--Among my friends. + +Before that time, had you seen yourself and read any publication, either +in manuscript or print, on this subject?--I had read the reports in some +papers, naturally, after that time, and I might have seen a pamphlet +printed at Manchester. + +Then you had seen several accounts which had been given to the world +before you wrote?--Yes, I saw the reports of the papers immediately after +the meeting. + +Whose account did you see, besides the reports in the paper?--A Mr. +Phillips's. + +You, it seemed, entertained a different view of the transactions that had +taken place upon this day from those which had been given to the world +before that time?--I do not know; I should say a different view from some, +perhaps, and coinciding with the views of others. + +Coinciding with the views of some, and differing from the views of +others?--Respecting stones. + +No matter what. You are a magistrate, I understand?--I am not. + +Of neither Cheshire nor Lancashire?--No. + +I beg your pardon. You, however, were in the magistrates' room, I think +you said, at Mr. Buxton's?--I was. + +Of course you had an acquaintance with the gentlemen who were there +assembled, as acting magistrates of the committee for the counties of +Chester and Lancaster?--With two or three I had. + +Probably upon terms of intimacy with one of them?--Certainly. + +Was that gentleman there at that time?--He was. + +Did it occur to your mind at the time that the cavalry were sent for +(because you went back to a window, and saw the messenger crossing the +field, for the purpose of bringing them to the place, and were told or +heard there was a rumour in the room above, that the cavalry had been +sent for) did it occur (attend to my question) to you, at the time, from +the observations which you had made on the subject, that that step was +improper or premature?--I don't think it occurred to me either one way or +the other. + +Am I to understand from that then that you exercised no judgment upon the +subject at that time?--I certainly did exercise some judgment, some +opinion on it, at that time. + +Having exercised some judgment upon the subject, I ask you whether, in +your judgment, such as you exercised upon that point, the step was either +improper or premature?--I saw no necessity for it. + +Then you deemed it premature?--I saw no necessity for it. + +It struck you then as an unnecessary act?--Certainly. + +Then you would go down, of course, immediately and speak to your friend +upon the subject?--No. + +Nor ever expressed to that friend or to any other, at the time, your +opinion with respect to the impropriety of the step?--I had no other +friend to speak to. + +Did you speak to him?--I did not go down into the room again. + +Probably you might, being a gentleman of considerable acquaintance, meet +with some friend on going home, and might ride home with some gentleman, +at least part of the road?--Part of the road I did. + +Mr Markland, I presume?--I overtook Mr. Markland. + +Did you express any opinion to Mr. Markland upon these +proceedings?--Probably I did; but I have not the most distant +recollection. + +I ask you, upon your oath, Mr. Stanley, if you did not express to him your +entire concurrence in, and approbation of, the measures adopted by the +magistrates?--I answer, upon my oath, that I do not recollect having said +any such thing. + +Can you tell me whether you expressed any disapprobation of the measures +which it had been deemed necessary to adopt?--I have no recollection +whatever of the conversation. + +Then you mean to represent to us now, that your feelings upon the subject +were so indifferent, that you cannot tell now, whether you approved or +disapproved of these steps at the time?--I have not the most distant +recollection of any conversation I had with Mr. Markland. + +That is not an answer to my question. I ask you whether you mean to state +that at this time, you don't remember whether you entertained feelings of +approbation or disapprobation of those steps?--I thought it was a dreadful +occurrence; but I hoped that there were some grounds for it. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: You are speaking of what you thought?--It was in +answer to the question. + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: I am speaking of what you thought then. As I +understand you, you cannot recall to your recollection the impression +under which you laboured at the time you travelled home with Mr. +Markland?--I thought it a dreadful occurrence, but I hoped there were +grounds for it. + +Did you mention that to Mr. Markland?--I cannot recollect. + +It is very important that I should endeavour to extract from you, Mr. +Stanley, without meaning the slightest disrespect to you, every fact +within your knowledge on the subject; you say that after the meeting had +been dispersed, the first cavalry which appeared on the ground was the +Cheshire Yeomanry?--Not after the meeting had dispersed, but whilst in +progress to dispersion. + +Do you mean to state now, to the best of your recollection, that the +Cheshire Yeomanry were the first cavalry advancing on the ground after +that?--It depends on what you call the ground; the Cheshire Yeomanry were +the first, after the Manchester cavalry, that advanced at the left. + +Tell me, according to the best of your recollection, which of these troops +came first upon the ground?--The Cheshire Yeomanry; but you will observe +that, at this time, the disposition of the hustings occupied a good deal +of my attention, and I did not expect the others. + +The Cheshire Yeomanry came over broken and uneven ground?--I cannot tell. + +I observe that you use the word "apparently" twice, in answer to two +questions which were put to you, which were a repetition of the same +question--whether the two lines of constables surrounded the hustings or +not; I think you said they "apparently" did?--Apparently they did. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Surround the hustings?--Apparently. + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: Do you mean to state, then, that in your judgment +the avenue which was formed by the two lines of constables extended from +the house to the hustings?--At that time the impression on my mind was, +and it now is, that it certainly did. + +But of course you won't swear that it did?--I cannot swear; I can only +speak to the impression on my mind. + +In the same way that you swear to the existence of brickbats and +stones?--To the non-existence. + +I think you say you saw Hunt come upon the ground?--I saw the barouche. + +You saw the ladies and gentlemen both. Did you see any female?--I saw a +female. + +What was her use?--I have no conception of that. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Of what?-- + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: I asked whether she was for use or show. + +You did not know any of the parties inside?--I had not the most distant +knowledge of them. + +You had heard of Carlile?--I heard of him in London. + +You have heard since he was in Manchester that day?--I have heard it +to-day, in the course of another examination. I never heard it before. + +Hunt, when he saw the cavalry coming, I think, intimated his +knowledge--his cognisance of the fact--by desiring them to give three +cheers?--I could not hear. + +There was some cheering given?--There was a very loud cheer. + +From the hustings?--From all the mob. + +You say when he was addressing the mob, you did not hear his words, "but I +think, whatever his words were, they excited a shout from those +immediately about him, which was re-echoed with fearful animation by the +rest of the multitude"?--Certainly, that is the impression on my mind; +those were my own words. + +It was tremendous--the shout?--It was not so tremendous as the shout with +which Hunt was received on the ground; the first was the loudest shout. + +And the most appalling?--The first, when Hunt was received on the ground; +I never heard so loud a shout. + +"Terrific," was your word?--I should say terrific. + +You say that the people who were immediately contiguous to the hustings +heard what Hunt said?--I cannot say. + +You inferred that from their shouting?--Certainly. + +Then that shout was re-echoed by the mob at a distance?--I conceived so. + +What proportion, do you think, of the mass of the people, with their eyes +up, and mouths open, looking at that man during the time, could hear one +word he said?--I should think no one beyond ten yards from the hustings, +in the bustle of such a day--that is guess. + +I daresay it is a good guess, too; how do you think they would carry the +resolutions at the outside, at the right flank, the left flank, and beyond +the ten yards, upon the propositions made by this orator?--I have no +opinion to give about that. + +It certainly is a difficult point. It appeared to you that Hunt, as far as +his voice could reach, had a pretty absolute control over his friends; +they shouted as he spoke; it appeared that he was +commander-in-chief?--The thing never occurred to me; I cannot speak +positively. + +Have not you an opinion that he was head and leader of the party?--My +opinion certainly is, that he was. + +And now, I will ask you this question, as a clergyman, and as a man of +character, which I believe you to be--I ask you, upon your oath, whether, +in your judgment, the public tranquillity and the peace of Manchester were +not endangered by a mob of that description, composed in that manner, and +having such a man as Hunt at its head--Hunt and Carlile, for +instance?--Hunt and Carlile are dangerous people, and any mob under their +control must be dangerous. + +Re-examined by Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: + +Do you know, Mr. Stanley, whether this meeting was under the command of +either Hunt or Carlile?--No. + +When you say there was a shout given on the Manchester Yeomanry coming +into the field, was there any other shout besides that given by the +multitude?--There was. + +Whose shout was that?--The Manchester Yeomanry, the special constables, +and the people round the pavement in front of our house. + +May I ask you whether you were terrified by those shouts?--Personally, +certainly not. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Explain what you mean by that?--I myself was not +alarmed about them. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: And whether it did not create terror and +alarm?--Not to me individually, certainly not. + +You have said that you presented a description of what you saw at the +meeting, to some of your friends?--I did. + +How soon was that written after the meeting?--I can scarcely say; I should +think perhaps two months, but I cannot speak accurately. It was when the +impression was clear on my mind. + +Clear and fresh in your recollection. Will you have the goodness to tell +me whether you heard or saw any person read the Riot Act?--I neither heard +it read nor saw it read. + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: If it was read you did not hear it?--I did not hear +it. + +If it should turn out to have been read, and read loudly, there might have +been something else done--but that is conclusion--that is reason. + +Mr. EVANS: Your Lordship has on your note that McKennell said that he did +not[8] hear the Riot Act read. + +Mr. SERJEANT CROSS: He said so. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Yes, I have. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Then that is my case, my Lord. + + +[Illustration: Plan of Peterloo. (_F. A. B._) + +Compiled from a number of Contemporary Plans, and showing (in dotted +outline) the position of modern blocks of buildings. + +_By permission of Mr. H. Guppy._] + + + + +Sir William Jolliffe + +_afterwards_ + +LORD HYLTON + + +William George Hylton Jolliffe (1800-1876), the first Baron Hylton, was +the son of the Rev. W. J. Jolliffe. At the date of Peterloo he was not +quite nineteen years of age, and was serving as a Lieutenant in the 15th +Hussars, then quartered at the Cavalry Barracks at Manchester. He retired +from the Hussars with the rank of Captain. He was created a Baronet in +1821, and sat as member for Petersfield for about thirty years, acting for +a short time as Under Secretary for Home Affairs, and afterwards as +Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. He was exceedingly popular as a +Conservative Whip, and when he was raised to the Peerage in 1866, he took +the title of Baron Hylton from the family's connection with the Hyltons of +Hylton Castle. + +The letter which follows appeared in Dean Pellew's _Life of Lord +Sidmouth_, published in 1847. It will be seen that it is addressed to T. +G. B. Estcourt, Esq.; presumably he obtained the information for Dean +Pellew. The letter is approved and annotated by "E. Smyth, Esq., of +Norwich, who commanded a troop of the Cheshire Yeomanry at Peterloo." +Unfortunately, the Notes to the letter are somewhat confusing: some are +signed by Captain Smyth, others are not signed, and it is not easy to +determine their authorship. Moreover, Captain Smyth's contributions are +not on a level with the letter itself. It has therefore been thought +better to omit the Notes altogether, and allow Lieut. Jolliffe's very +clear and well-balanced report to speak for itself. A few explanatory +words have been inserted in square brackets. + +The Rev. Edward Stanley, in his Evidence, given above, mentioned the fact +that the Hussars who rode at Peterloo were wearing their Waterloo medals. +As a matter of fact, the 15th (the King's) Hussars, whose motto is +"Merebimur," have not only "Waterloo," but also the Peninsula, Vittoria, +Afghanistan and a number of other names inscribed on their colours. The +uniform is blue, with a Busby bag and scarlet plume. Presumably the plume +shown in our photograph came from the helmet of one of the Hussars. It +seems clear from the evidence which was given before the Relief Committee, +after Peterloo, that there was not the same feeling of resentment against +the Hussars as against the local Yeomanry; in fact, it was more than once +asserted that troopers of the Hussars actually restrained the Manchester +Yeomanry from excessive violence. + + * * * * * + +I wrote to the present Lord Hylton to ask if he could lend a portrait of +his Grandfather for reproduction here. He replied that he could not do so, +but added: "As a matter of fact, a full-length portrait (by Sir Francis +Grant, P.R.A., in my possession) has been engraved, and a copy of this +engraving is, I should think, not difficult to procure." I have not been +able to find it. It is not included in the British Museum Series. + + + + +The Charge of the 15th Hussars at Peterloo + +_as described by_ + +SIR WILLIAM G. H. JOLLIFFE, BART., M.P. (who rode in the charge as a +Lieutenant of Hussars) in a letter which appears in Dean Pellew's _Life of +Lord Sidmouth_, Vol. III., p. 253 _et seq._ + +9, ST. JAMES'S PLACE, + +_April 11th, 1845_. + +MY DEAR SIR, + +Twenty-five years have passed since the collision unfortunately occurred +between the population of Manchester and its neighbourhood and the +military stationed in that town, on the sixteenth of August, 1819. + +I was at that time a Lieutenant in the 15th King's Hussars, which Regiment +had been quartered in Manchester Cavalry Barracks about six weeks. This +was my first acquaintance with a large manufacturing population. I had +little knowledge of the condition of that population, whether or no a +great degree of distress was then prevalent, or whether or no the distrust +and bad feeling which appeared to exist between employers and employed, +was wholly or in part caused by the agitation of political questions. I +will not, therefore, enter into any speculation on these points, but I +will endeavour to relate the facts which fell under my own observations, +although acting, as of course I was, under the command of others, and in a +subordinate situation. The military force stationed in Manchester +consisted of six troops of the 15th Hussars, under the command of Colonel +Dalrymple; one troop of Horse Artillery with two guns, under Major +Dyneley; and nearly the whole of the 31st Regiment, under Colonel Guy +L'Estrange (who commanded the whole as senior officer). [Sir John Byng was +then at Pontefract.] Some companies of the 88th Regiment and [six troops +of] the Cheshire Yeomanry had also been brought into the town in +anticipation of disturbances which might result from the expected meeting; +and these latter had only arrived on the morning of the sixteenth, or a +few hours previously; and, lastly, there was a troop of Manchester +Yeomanry Cavalry, consisting of about forty members, who, from the manner +in which they were made use of (to say the least) greatly aggravated the +disasters of the day. Their ranks were filled chiefly by wealthy master +manufacturers; and without the knowledge possessed by a (strictly +speaking) military body, they were placed, most unwisely, as it appeared, +under the immediate command and order of the civil authorities. + +Our Regiment paraded in field-service order at about 8.30 or it might be 9 +o'clock, a.m. Two squadrons of it were marched into the town about ten +o'clock. They were formed up and dismounted in a wide street, the name of +which I forget,[9] to the North of St. Peter's field (the place appointed +for the meeting), and at the distance of nearly a quarter of a mile from +it. + +The Cheshire Yeomanry were formed, on our left, in the same street. One +troop of our Regiment was attached to the artillery, which took up a +position between the Cavalry Barracks and the town; and one troop remained +in charge of the Barracks. + +The two squadrons with which I was stationed must have remained dismounted +nearly two hours. During the greater portion of that period a solid mass +of people continued moving along a street about a hundred yards to our +front on the way to the place of meeting. Other officers as well as myself +occasionally rode to the front (to the end of a street) to see them pass. +They marched at a brisk pace in ranks well closed up, five or six bands of +music being interspersed, and there appeared to be but few women with +them. Mr. Hunt, with two or three other men, and I think two women dressed +in light blue and white, were in an open carriage drawn by the people. +This carriage was adorned with blue and white flags; and the day was fine +and hot. As soon as the great bulk of the procession had passed, we were +ordered to stand to our horses. In a very short time afterwards, the four +troops of the 15th mounted, and at once moved off by the right, at a trot +which was increased to a canter. Someone who had been sent from the place +of meeting to bring us led the way through a number of narrow streets and +by a circuitous route to (what I will call) the South-west[10] corner of +St. Peter's field. We advanced along the South[11] side of this space of +ground without a halt or pause even: the words "Front!" and "Forward!" +were given, and the trumpet sounded the charge at the very moment the +threes wheeled up. When fronted, our line extended quite across the +ground, which in all parts was so filled with people that their hats +seemed to touch. + +It was then for the first time that I saw the Manchester troop of +Yeomanry; they were scattered singly or in small groups over the greater +part of the field, literally hemmed up and hedged into the mob so that +they were powerless either to make an impression or to escape; in fact, +they were in the power of those whom they were designed to overawe, and it +required only a glance to discover their helpless position, and the +necessity of our being brought to their rescue. As I was at the time +informed, this hopeless state of things happened thus: A platform had been +erected near the centre of the field, from which Mr. Hunt and others were +to address the multitude, and the magistrates, having ordered a strong +body of constables to arrest the speakers, unfortunately imagined that +they should support the peace officers by bringing up the troop of +Yeomanry at a walk. The result of this movement, instead of that which the +magistrates desired, was unexpectedly to place this small body of horsemen +(so introduced into a dense mob) entirely at the mercy of the people by +whom they were, on all sides, pressed upon and surrounded. + +The charge of the Hussars, to which I have just alluded, swept this +mingled mass of human beings before it; people, yeomen, and constables, +in their confused attempts to escape, ran one over the other; so that by +the time we had arrived at the end of the field the fugitives were +literally piled up to a considerable elevation above the level of the +ground. (I may here, by the way, state that this field, as it is called, +was merely an open space of ground, surrounded by buildings, and itself, I +rather think, in course of being built upon.). + +The Hussars drove the people forward with the flats of their swords, but +sometimes, as is almost inevitably the case when men are placed in such +situations, the edge was used, both by the Hussars, and, as I have heard, +by the yeomen also; but of this last part I was not cognizant, and +believing though I do that nine out of ten of the sabre-wounds were caused +by the Hussars, I must still consider that it redounds to the humane +forbearance of the men of the 15th that more wounds were not received, +when the vast numbers are taken into consideration with whom they were +brought into hostile collision; beyond all doubt, however, the far greater +amount of injuries were from the pressure of the routed multitude. The +Hussars on the left pursued down the various streets which led from the +place; those on the right met with something more of resistance. + +The mob had taken possession of various buildings on that side, +particularly of a Quakers' chapel and burial ground enclosed with a wall. +This they occupied for some little time, and in attempting to displace +them, some of the men and horses were struck with stones and brickbats. I +was on the left, and as soon as I had passed completely over the ground +and found myself in the street on the other side, I turned back, and then, +seeing a sort of fight still going on on the right, I went in that +direction. At the very moment I reached the Quakers' meeting-house, I saw +a farrier of the 15th ride at a small door in the outer wall, and to my +surprise his horse struck it with such force that it flew open. Two or +three Hussars then rode in, and the place was immediately in their +possession. I then turned towards the elevated platform, which still +remained in the centre of the field with persons upon it; a few straggling +Hussars and yeomen, together with a number of men having the appearance of +peace-officers were congregating about it. On my way thither I met the +Commanding-officer of my Regiment, who directed me to find a Trumpeter, in +order that he might sound the "rally" or "retreat." This sent me again +down the street I had first been in (after the pursuing men of my troop); +but I had not ridden above a hundred yards before I found a Trumpeter, and +returned with him to the Colonel. The field and the adjacent streets now +presented an extraordinary sight: the ground was quite covered with hats, +shoes, musical instruments, and other things. Here and there lay the +unfortunates who were too much injured to move away, and this sight was +rendered the more distressing by observing some women among the sufferers. + +Standing near the corner of the street where I had been sent in search of +a Trumpeter, a brother officer called my attention to a pistol being fired +from a window. I saw it fired twice, and I believe it had been fired once +before I observed it. Some of the 31st Regiment just now arriving on the +ground were ordered to take possession of this house, but I do not know if +this was carried into effect. + +I next went towards a private of the Regiment whose horse had fallen over +a piece of timber nearly in the middle of the square, and who was most +seriously injured. There were many of these pieces of timber (or +timber-trees) lying upon the ground, and as these could not be +distinguished when the mob covered them, they had caused bad falls to one +officer's horse and to many of the troopers'. While I was attending to the +wounded soldier, the artillery troop with the troop of Hussars attached to +it, arrived on the ground from the same direction by which we had entered +the field; these were quickly followed by the Cheshire Yeomanry. The 31st +Regiment came in another direction, and the whole remained formed up till +our squadrons had fallen in again. + +Carriages were brought to convey the wounded to the Manchester Infirmary, +and the troop of Hussars who came up with the guns was marched off to +escort to the gaol a number of persons who had been arrested, and among +these Mr. Hunt. For some time the town was patrolled by the troops, the +streets being nearly empty, and the shops for the most part closed. We +then returned to the Barracks. I should not omit to mention that, before +the men were dismissed, the arms were minutely examined; and that no +carbine or pistol was found to have been fired, and only one pistol to +have been loaded. + +About 8 p.m. one squadron of the 15th Hussars (two troops) was ordered on +duty to form part of a strong night picket, the other part of which +consisted of two companies of the 88th Regiment. This picket was stationed +at a place called the New Cross, at the end of Oldham Street. As soon as +it had taken up its position, a mob assembled about it, which increased as +the darkness came on; stones were thrown at the soldiers, and the Hussars +many times cleared the ground by driving the mob up the streets leading +from the New Cross. But these attempts to get rid of the annoyance were +only successful for the moment, for the people got through the houses or +narrow passages from one street into another, and the troops were again +attacked, and many men and horses struck with stones. This lasted nearly +an hour and a half, and the soldiers being more and more pressed upon, a +town magistrate, who was with the picket, read the Riot Act, and the +officer in command ordered the 88th to fire (which they did by platoon +firing) down three of the streets. The firing lasted only a few minutes; +perhaps not more than thirty shots were fired; but these had a magical +effect; the mob ran away and dispersed forthwith, leaving three or four +persons on the ground with gunshot wounds. At 4 a.m. the picket squadron +was relieved by another squadron of the Regiment. With this latter +squadron I was on duty, and after we had patrolled the town for two hours, +the officer in command sent me to the magistrates (who had remained +assembled during the night) to report to them that the town was perfectly +quiet, and to request their sanction to the return of the military to +their quarters. + +On the afternoon of the 17th I visited, in company with some military +medical officers, the Infirmary. I saw there from twelve to twenty cases +of sabre-wounds, and among these two women who appeared not likely to +recover. One man was in a dying state from a gunshot wound in the head; +another had had his leg amputated; both these casualties arose from the +firing of the 88th the night before. Two or three were reputed dead; one +of them a constable, killed on St. Peter's field, but I saw none of the +bodies. + +As shortly as I could I have now related what fell under my own +observation during these twenty-four hours ... I trust that I have, in +some degree, complied with your wishes. + +WILLIAM G. HYLTON JOLLIFFE. + +_To_ Thomas Grimston Bucknall Estcourt, Esq., M.P. + + + + +[Illustration: JOHN BENJAMIN SMITH 1794-1879 + +_By permission of Lady Durning Lawrence_ + +_Photo by Briggs_ + +_To face page 59_] + + +John Benjamin Smith + +_First Chairman of the Anti-Corn Law League_. + + +John Benjamin Smith (1794-1879), whose account of Peterloo follows, was +better known as a strenuous advocate of Free Trade; even in this capacity, +however, a breakdown of health some years before the Repeal of the Corn +Laws, robbed him of much of the credit which was due to him for the +important spade-work that he had done. He was the first Treasurer of the +Anti-Corn Law Association, and when that developed into the Anti-Corn Law +League, he became its first Chairman. He contested several elections on +Free Trade principles, and used himself to tell how he had converted +Cobden to "total repeal." He sat as member, first for the Stirling Burghs, +and afterwards, during more than twenty years, for Stockport. His +correspondence with John Bright has recently been placed in the Manchester +Reference Library. During the American War he strongly espoused the cause +of the North, and he was one of those who urged the Government to +encourage the growth of cotton in India. + +Mr. Smith was a Trustee of Owens College under the Founder's will; and he +subscribed liberally towards its extension. His name is perpetuated in the +"Smith" Professorship of English Literature, which was endowed in memory +of him by his two daughters and his son-in-law. A short memoir of him, +which appeared in Alderman Thompson's _History of Owens College_, has been +reprinted and published separately. (Manchester, J. E. Cornish, 1887.) + +At the date of Peterloo he was only twenty-five years of age, but he had +already shown great promise as a business man. Entering the office of his +uncle, a Manchester merchant, at the early age of fourteen, he was made +responsible for the whole correspondence of the firm five years later; and +before he was twenty he had negotiated some very profitable purchases of +cotton at the sales of the East India Company. + +The account of Peterloo which follows is an extract from his +"Reminiscences," which were written towards the close of his life at the +earnest request of his family. The manuscript of these is now at the +Manchester Reference Library, as is also a typed and bound copy presented +by his daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. Among his other manuscripts (also +at the Manchester Reference Library) is a shorter account of Peterloo, +apparently written immediately after the event. The statement made +recently that Mr. J. B. Smith was the author of the well-known _Impartial +Narrative of the Melancholy Occurrences at Manchester_ seems to be due to +an error: apparently the _Impartial Narrative_ (which seems to have been +written by another hand) has been confused with Mr. Smith's shorter and +earlier account. + +We have already pointed out that Mr. Smith's narrative, which is not so +detailed as those of Stanley and Jolliffe in its description of the charge +of the troops, is specially valuable for the account it gives of the +circumstances immediately preceding and following the catastrophe, and its +estimate of the character of the crowd. In these details it is strikingly +corroborative of Bamford's story, as told in his _Passages in the Life of +a Radical_, and of the information given by Mr. John Edward Taylor, +who--under the pseudonym of "An Observer"--edited the contemporary tracts +entitled _The Peterloo Massacre_. + + * * * * * + +The portrait of Mr. Smith which appears here is from a photograph kindly +lent by his daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. + + + + +_AN EXTRACT FROM THE_ + +"Reminiscences" of John Benjamin Smith + +_Copied from the original manuscript then in the possession of his +daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. (August 1913.)_ + + +... The people, disappointed in their expectations that prosperity and +plenty would follow the return of peace, and having no faith in a +legislature which as soon as the war terminated inflicted upon them a Corn +Law to deprive them of cheap corn, demanded a better representation in +Parliament. Stimulated by the writings of Cobbett, associations were +formed in all the manufacturing districts to obtain a reform in +Parliament. Lancashire took the lead in this movement. Clubs were +established in 1816 in all the manufacturing towns and villages. At the +small town of Middleton, near Manchester, a Club was formed in which +Bamford, the weaver-poet, took a leading part. They were joined by many +honest and intelligent men from all parts of the district, among whom was +John Knight, a small manufacturer. A meeting of delegates was held on the +first of January, 1817, at which it was decided that the reforms required +could only be accomplished by the establishment of annual parliaments and +universal suffrage. + +The establishment of these clubs alarmed the Government, who saw in them +nothing but an intention to overturn the institutions of the country, and +to revive in this country the enormities of the French Revolution. Spies +and Informers were employed by the Government, and John Knight and +thirty-seven others who had legally assembled to discuss the reforms which +they deemed necessary to obtain a repeal of the Corn Laws and good +government, were arrested on the information of spies, and sent for trial +to Lancaster, but on their trial before Mr. Baron Wood, were all found not +guilty by the Jury. + +The Sidmouth Government suspended the Habeas Corpus Act so that they could +arrest and imprison any person as long as they pleased. The Tories, +following the example of the Radicals, established Associations for the +protection of the Constitution. + +In January, 1818, however, it was announced that the Act for the +suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act would be repealed. No sooner were the +people relieved from the danger of being sent to prison for being present +at a meeting to petition Parliament for reform, as great numbers had been +in Lancashire imprisoned from March, 1817 until January, 1818, and then +discharged without being informed what charges were made against +them--than the Reform Associations were revived. A fresh campaign was +rigorously commenced early in 1819. + +Henry Hunt (commonly called Orator Hunt) had come forward as the champion +of the people's rights. On the 25th of January, he made a public entry +into Manchester from Stockport, accompanied by large crowds with flags and +banners. The meeting was enthusiastic but very peaceable. Meetings were +held in all the surrounding towns and villages to appoint district +delegates to make arrangements for a great meeting to be held in +Manchester. This memorable meeting was held on the 16th of August, 1819, +on a large vacant plot of land called St. Peter's field, adjoining St. +Peter's Street, and in sight of St. Peter's Church. The actors in the +bloody tragedy of that day were called "The Heroes of Peterloo," in +contrast with the brave heroes of Waterloo. + +This meeting was called to petition Parliament for a Reform of Parliament +and the Repeal of the Corn Laws, and it is a curious coincidence that on +the very spot where the largest public meeting was ever held to petition +Parliament for the Repeal of the Corn Laws, in the dispersion of which by +military force six hundred persons were killed and wounded there now +stands the Free Trade Hall, erected twenty years afterwards on Peterloo, +for the peaceful and noble object of obtaining bread for the people by the +repeal of the wicked laws by which it was prohibited. + +I had no intention of going to this meeting, but my Aunt called at the +Counting House and asked me to accompany her to Mrs. Orton's, Mount +Street, St. Peter's field, to see the great meeting--a house overlooking +the whole space, and next but one to where the Magistrates were assembled. +We reached there about half-past eleven o'clock, and on our way saw large +bodies of men and women with bands playing and flags and banners bearing +devices: "No Corn Laws," "Reform," etc. There were crowds of people in all +directions, full of good humour, laughing and shouting and making fun. I +always wore a white hat in summer, and I found that Mr. Hunt also wore a +white hat, and it became the symbol of radicalism, and may have been the +cause of the politeness shown to us by the crowd. + +It seemed to be a gala day with the country people who were mostly dressed +in their best and brought with them their wives, and when I saw boys and +girls taking their father's hand in the procession, I observed to my Aunt: +"These are the guarantees of their peaceable intentions--we need have no +fears," and so we passed on to Mrs. Orton's. When we arrived there we saw +great crowds which were constantly increased by the arrival of successive +country processions until it was estimated that the meeting amounted to +60,000 people. There was a double row of constables formed from Mr. +Buxton's (where the magistrates had taken their station) to the hustings. + +My Father joined us soon after our arrival at Mrs. Orton's. + +At length Hunt made his appearance in an open barouche drawn by two +horses, and a woman dressed in white sitting on the box. On their reaching +the hustings which were prepared for the orator, he was received with +enthusiastic applause; the waving of hats and flags; the blowing of +trumpets; and the playing of music. Hunt stepped on to the hustings, and +was again cheered by the vast assemblage. He began to address them, and I +could distinctly see his motions through the glass I held in my hand, and +I could hear his voice, but could not understand what he said. He paused, +and the people cheered him. + +About this time there was an alarm among the women and children near the +place where I stood, and I could also see a part of the crowd in motion +towards the Deansgate side, but I thought it a false alarm, as many +returned again and joined in the huzzas of the crowd. A second alarm +arose, and I heard the sound of a horn, and immediately the Manchester +Yeomanry appeared, coming from Peter Street, headed by Hugh Birley, the +same man who, in 1815, as Boroughreeve of Manchester, presided at the +public meeting assembled to petition Parliament for the Repeal of the Corn +Laws. They galloped up to the house where the Magistrates were assembled, +halted, and drew up in line. After some hesitation, from what cause I do +not know, I heard the order to form three deep, and then the order to +march. The Trumpeter led the way and galloped towards the hustings, +followed by the yeomanry. + +Whilst this was passing, my attention was called to another movement +coming from the opposite side of the meeting. A troop of soldiers, the +15th Hussars, turned round the corner of the house where we stood and +galloped forwards towards the crowd. They were succeeded by the Cheshire +Yeomanry, and lastly by two pieces of artillery. On the arrival of the +soldiers, the special constables, the magistrates, and the soldiers set +up loud shouts. This was responded to by the crowd with waving of hats. +After this the soldiers galloped amongst the people creating frightful +alarm and disorder. The people ran helter-skelter in every direction. + +It was a hot, dusty day; clouds of dust arose which obscured the view. +When it had subsided a startling scene was presented. Numbers of men, +women, and children were lying on the ground who had been knocked down and +run over by the soldiers. I noticed one woman lying face downwards, +apparently lifeless. A man went up to her and lifted one of her legs; it +fell as if she were lifeless; another man lifted both her legs and let +them fall. I saw her some time after carried off by the legs and arms as +if she were dead. + +My attention was then directed to a number of constables bringing from the +hustings the famous Hunt wearing a white hat, and with him another man, +also wearing a white hat, who was said to be Johnson. The prisoners were +treated in a scandalous manner; many of the constables hissed and beat +them as they passed. When they reached the Magistrates' house he was +surrounded by constables, some pulling him by the collar, others by the +coat. A dastardly attack was made upon him by General Clay, who with a +large stick struck him over the head with both hands as he was +ascending the steps to the Magistrates' house. The blow knocked in his hat +and packed it over his face. He then turned round as if ashamed of himself +and became a quiet spectator. The ground by this time was cleared, and +nothing was to be seen but soldiers and constables. + + +[Illustration: THE HUNT MEMORIAL IN THE VESTIBULE OF THE MANCHESTER REFORM +CLUB + +_Bronze Relief by John Cassidy, R.C.A._ + +_To face page 69_] + + +The Rev. Mr. Hay (the Chairman to the Magistrates) then stood on the steps +of Mr. Buxton's house and addressed the constables. I could not hear what +he said, but he was cheered when he concluded. He then returned into the +house, but came out again soon afterwards with Mr. Marriott, the +Magistrate, and Hunt in the custody of Nadin, Chief Constable, and with +Johnson in the custody of another constable. When Hunt made his +appearance, he was assailed with groans and hisses by the soldiers and +constables. Hunt took off his hat and bowed to them, which appeared to +calm them while they marched towards Deansgate on their way to the New +Bailey prison, escorted by the cavalry. On quitting the windows from +whence we had witnessed so many painful scenes, we descended and found two +special constables who had been brought into the house. One presented a +shocking sight--the face was all over blood from a sword-cut on his head, +and his shoulder was put out. The other was bloody from being rode over +and kicked on the back of his head. + +When the particulars of this bloody tragedy became known, strong feelings +of indignation were expressed all over the country. The Manchester +magistrates, alarmed at the tone of public opinion in London, had a +meeting hastily convened on the 19th of August at the Police Office, which +was adjourned to the Star Inn, where resolutions were passed thanking the +magistrates and the soldiers. I happened by accident to be present at the +meeting. A young man with whom I was acquainted, a clerk in the office of +the Clerk to the Magistrates, happening to meet me in the street on his +way to the meeting, took me by the arm and said: "Come with me." I asked +where he was going, and when I learned, declined to go. He replied: +"Nonsense, you will hear what is going on," and so I somewhat reluctantly +went with him to the Star Inn. On our arrival we found the room pretty +full and I took a seat. The Chairman, Mr. Francis Phillips, rose and said: +"If there be any persons present who do not approve of the objects of this +meeting they are requested to withdraw." I thought he looked at me, and +felt a little uncomfortable. He sat down again and rose to repeat his +request. I thought that as I should know better what the object of the +meeting was after I had heard it explained, I would sit still, and so I +remained to the end. After the meeting I told some of my Reform friends +how I came to be present at the meeting, and they wished me to write out +an account of the proceedings. I did so, and with a few alterations and +the omission of names it was inserted in _Cowdroy's Gazette_. This +statement created great alarm among those who got up the meeting to thank +the magistrates, and they denounced it as a false statement, but another +letter to _Cowdroy's Gazette_ affirmed the truth of the account of the +meeting to thank the magistrates, and threatened to make public the names +of the speakers if its correctness was again called in question. + + +[Illustration: THE PETERLOO MEDAL + +Note the women and children, and the cap of Liberty held aloft in the +centre + +_To face page 71_] + + +The dispersion of a legally convened meeting by military force aroused a +general indignation, and the smuggled passing of thanks to the magistrates +so dishonestly sent forth occasioned an expression of public feeling and +opinion such as had never been manifested in Manchester before. A +"Declaration and Protest" against the Star Inn resolutions was immediately +issued, stating that "We are fully satisfied by personal observation on +undoubted information that the meeting was _perfectly peaceable_; that no +seditious or intemperate harangues were made there; that the Riot Act, _if +read at all_, was read _privately, or without the knowledge of a great +body of the meeting_, and we feel it our bounden duty to protest against +and to express our utter disapprobation of the unexpected and unnecessary +violence by which the assembly was dispersed. + +"We further declare that the meeting convened at the Police Office on the +19th of August for the purpose of thanking the magistrates, municipal +officers, soldiers, etc., was strictly and exclusively _private_, and in +order that the privacy might be more completely ensured was adjourned to +the Star Inn. It is a matter of notoriety that no expression of dissent +from the main object of the meeting was there permitted. We therefore deny +that it had any claim to the title of a 'numerous and highly respectable +meeting of the inhabitants of Manchester and Salford and their +neighbourhood.'" + +In the course of three or four days this protest received 4,800 +signatures. + +By way of counteracting this energetic protest, on the 27th of August Lord +Sidmouth communicated to the Manchester Magistrates and to Major Trafford +and the military serving under him the thanks of the Prince Regent "for +their prompt, decisive, and efficient measures for preservation of the +public peace on August the 16th." + +Meanwhile hundreds of persons wounded on that fatal day were enduring +dreadful suffering. They were disabled from work; not daring to apply for +parish relief; not even daring to apply for surgical aid, lest, in the +arbitrary spirit of the time, their acknowledgment that they had received +their wounds on St. Peter's field might send them to prison--perhaps to +the scaffold. + +A committee was formed for the purpose of making a rigid enquiry into the +cases of those who had been killed and wounded; and subscriptions were +raised for their relief. After an enquiry of many successive weeks the +committee published the cases of eleven killed and five hundred and sixty +wounded, of whom about a hundred and twenty were females. + +The Rev. W. R. Hay, Chairman of the Bench of Magistrates, was rewarded by +being presented to the living of Rochdale, worth £2,000 a year. + +Hunt and his companions were committed to Lancaster, and subsequently +tried at York, where he was found guilty and sentenced to be imprisoned +for two years and a half, and Johnson, Healey, and Bamford to one year's +imprisonment. + +The bloody proceedings at Peterloo startled the whole nation. Meetings +were held everywhere, denouncing them in the strongest terms. Sir Francis +Burdett addressed a letter to the Electors of Westminster, expressing his +"Shame, grief, and indignation" at the proceedings, and was prosecuted by +the Attorney-General for Libel and was fined £2,000 and imprisoned for +three months. Lord Fitzwilliam, for attending a public meeting to express +disapprobation at the means by which the meeting at Peterloo was +dispersed, was dismissed from his office as Lord Lieutenant of Yorkshire. + +These proceedings produced a deep impression on the minds of thoughtful +men, who began to think we were on the brink of despotism, and that the +time had arrived when the country should be no longer ruled by Landowners +and Boroughmongers, but by representatives chosen by the people.... + + + + +[Illustration: BANNER CARRIED AT PETERLOO + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 75_] + + +APPENDIX A. + +Some Relics of Peterloo + + +1.--A BANNER CARRIED AT PETERLOO. + +At the entrance to the Reading-room of the Reform Club at Middleton (on +the left as you reach the door) may be seen one of the Banners carried at +Peterloo by the Middleton contingent, which was led by Samuel Bamford. It +is of green material (or so it seemed to me) and the letters are stamped +on it in gold capitals. The motto facing the entrance is LIBERTY AND +FRATERNITY. On the other side of the Banner (seen from within the room) +are the words: UNITY AND STRENGTH. The explanatory inscription reads: +"This Banner was carried by the Middleton Reformers, with Samuel Bamford +at their head, to Peterloo, and is frequently mentioned in the historical +records of that movement." (See Illustration opposite). + +In chapter XXXIII. of _Passages in the Life of a Radical_ Bamford speaks +of "the colours; a blue one of silk, with inscriptions in golden letters: +UNITY AND STRENGTH, LIBERTY AND FRATERNITY. A green one of silk, with +golden letters, PARLIAMENTS ANNUAL, SUFFRAGE UNIVERSAL." Apparently the +Banner here figured is the one of which he writes later in chapter XXXVI.: +"I rejoined my companions [_i.e._, after Peterloo], and forming about a +thousand of them into file, we set off to the sound of fife and drum, +_with our only banner waving_, and in that form we re-entered the town of +Middleton. The Banner was exhibited from a window of the Suffield's Arms +public-house." The Banner is now carefully preserved between sheets of +glass. The photograph was taken under considerable difficulties as regards +light by Mr. R. H. Fletcher, of Eccles. The Chadderton Banner, though much +dilapidated, is also still in existence, but I could not obtain the +address of the person in whose keeping it is. She had left Chadderton, and +was living at Blackpool. + + +2.--BAMFORD'S COTTAGE. + +Some distance higher up the town may be seen the house where Bamford lived +at the date of Peterloo. Over the door is a stone inscribed: "Samuel +Bamford resided and was arrested in this house, Aug. 26, 1819." Bamford +describes the event in detail in chapter XL of the work named above, +beginning: "About two o'clock on the morning of Thursday, the twenty-sixth +of August, that is, on the tenth morning after the fatal meeting, I was +awoke by footsteps in the street opposite my residence. Presently they +increased in number, etc." The photograph is again by Mr. R. H. Fletcher. +(See Illustration.) In the Churchyard above may be seen Bamford's tomb and +also the monument raised to his memory. + + +[Illustration: SAMUEL BAMFORD'S HOUSE AT MIDDLETON + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 76_] + + +3.--CONSTABLES' STAVES. + +(_a_) In the Catalogue of the _Old Manchester & Salford Exhibition_ (held +at the Art Gallery in 1904), on p. 27, exhibit 157 appears as "Handcuffs +belonging to Joe Nadin, Deputy Constable of Manchester at the time of +Peterloo;" lent by G. C. Yates, Esq. On the same page, exhibit 167 is a +"Special Constable's Staff, used at the time of Peterloo in Manchester, +and then the property of Mr. Beever;" lent by C. Shiel, Esq. This +collection is now for the most part dispersed. + + +[Illustration: THREE RELICS OF PETERLOO + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 77_] + + +(_b_) Mr. T. Swindells, of Monton Green, in the third volume of his +_Manchester Streets and Manchester Men_, mentions "A Special Constable's +Staff" given to him by a descendant of James Fildes. It is inscribed: "A +relic of Peterloo. Special Constable's Staff which belonged to the late +James and Thomas Fildes, grocers, Shudehill, Manchester." + +(_c_) In November, 1919, on the afternoon of the day on which I was to +lecture on _The Story of Peterloo_, at the Rylands Library, Mr. W. W. +Manfield, of Chorlton-cum-Hardy, brought me three interesting relics of +Peterloo, which have been in the possession of his family since 1819. On +the occasion of Peterloo his father and grandfather saw the crowd +streaming through Salford after the catastrophe, and their curiosity led +them to walk out to St. Peter's fields. There they picked up the three +relics, which have been carefully preserved ever since. One of them is a +long, heavy Constable's baton, apparently of rosewood, with the Royal Arms +painted at the thicker end. (See Illustration opposite.) + + +4.--HEAD OF FLAGSTAFF. + +The second of Mr. Manfield's relics is the head of one of the Banner poles +carried at Peterloo. It is shaped like the traditional cap of Liberty, and +inscribed in neat gilt capitals: "Hunt and Liberty." (See Illustration.) + + +5.--HUSSAR'S PLUME. + +The third of Mr. Manfield's relics is a plume of horsehair, apparently +originally dyed red, though (if so) much of the dye has faded. This, it +may be presumed, was the plume from the helmet of one of the Hussars. It +has been mentioned that the 15th Hussars wear a scarlet plume. These three +relics have been photographed on one plate by Mr. Fletcher. (See +Illustration opposite to page 77.) + + +6.--ACCOUNT-BOOK OF THE RELIEF COMMITTEE. + +In the year of the Centenary, Mr. Guppy was fortunate enough to secure for +the Rylands Library the actual Account-Book used by one of the Committees +formed for the relief of those injured in the fray. A single page of this +book has been photographed by Mr. R. H. Fletcher for the present volume. +(See Illustration.) Mr. Guppy's account of the volume (_Bulletin of +Rylands Library_, April to November, 1919, p. 191) is as follows:-- + +"The Library has been fortunate in being able to acquire a small octavo +account-book, leather bound, which seems to have been an official record +of the casualties at Peterloo which were dealt with by one of the Relief +Committees. It contains details of the names, addresses, and injuries of +347 individuals, particulars of the successive grants made to them by one +Committee, and references to the grants made by another Committee +(possibly two others). + +The details given are corroborative of many of the statements in Mr. +Bruton's _Story of Peterloo_. Thus: the cases include those of Elizabeth +Gaunt (mentioned on pp. 274 and 275), of Mrs. Fildes (on p. 274), of +Thomas Redford (on pp. 285, 291, and 294). There are references to the +loose timber (see pp. 269, 284 and 294), the injuries to Special +Constables (see p. 280), the fight near the Friends' Meeting-house (see +pp. 284 and 289), the oak trees growing near that building (see pp. 269, +294), the white hat as a symbol of Radicalism (see p. 273), the fear of +losing employment evinced by the wounded (see p. 291), the infantry +intercepting fugitives (see p. 290), the child killed by a trooper in +Cooper Street (see p. 277), and so on. The sum total voted by this +Committee appears to have been £687; it must be remembered, however, that +the sum of £3,000 mentioned on p. 291 as having been subscribed may have +been used partly for legal expenses. + + +[Illustration: One Page of the Account Book of the Relief Committee. + +_By permission of Mr. H. Guppy._ + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher._] + + +Since this manuscript account-book came to light, Mr. Bruton has +discovered a printed Report of the Relief Committee, in which 560 cases +are described, and the amount raised to date is given as £3,408 1s. 8d., +and pronounced to be inadequate for 600 people. It also gives the amount +spent on legal expenses as £1,077." + + +7.--ACCOUNT-BOOK RECORDING AMOUNTS RAISED FOR THE RELIEF OF SPECIAL +CONSTABLES & THEIR FAMILIES. + +I have to thank Dr. A. A. Mumford for calling my attention to another +account-book connected with Peterloo, which I believe he met with while +going over the Crossley papers at the Chetham Library. Its number in the +Library Catalogue is MS. B. 3. 70. It is a small note-book ruled for cash, +and entitled: "Subscriptions for Special Constables. Nos. 10 and 11." +There is a note of a Resolution carried on August 27th, 1819, to the +effect that a Relief Fund should be raised on behalf of Special Constables +injured at Peterloo and their families. The subscriptions recorded in this +book range from £1 to £10 10s., and amount in all to about £400. + + + + +APPENDIX B. + + +1.--NOTE ON THE CASUALTIES AT PETERLOO. + +On few points do the accounts of Peterloo vary more than on the question +of the casualties. There is sufficient historical material available to +enable us to investigate this matter in detail, but the task would be a +gruesome one, and no useful object would be attained if it were +accomplished. On the other hand, a few words may serve to show whereabouts +the truth lies. + +In the _Cambridge Modern History_ (Vol. X., pp. 580, 581) it is stated +that "a man was killed and forty were injured." In the _Political History +of England_ (1906, Vol. XI., pp. 178, 179) we read that "happily the +actual loss of life did not exceed five or six, but a much larger number +were more or less wounded." A number of the most important school +histories in use at the present time reproduce one or the other of these +statements _verbatim_. + +If we turn to the contemporary records, they are somewhat conflicting. The +hurried estimates given by the local papers immediately after the +catastrophe (_e.g._, one newspaper reported twelve killed) had to be +corrected later. The most general estimate seems to be "eleven killed and +between 500 and 600 wounded." When we come to examine these figures in +detail, however, these points emerge: (1) "Killed" is evidently taken to +include the cases of those who died after lingering (possibly) for some +weeks. (2) The summary includes the casualties due to the firing of the +infantry in the neighbourhood of New Cross, some hours after the great +event; included in the list, also will be the child (Fildes) knocked from +its mother's arms by one of the yeomanry as they were riding to the +meeting. + +Archibald Prentice, in his _Historical Sketches and Personal Recollections +of Manchester_ (p. 167), states that eleven were killed, that 420 were +wounded, and that there still remained (according to the Relief +Committee's Report) 140 cases to be investigated, making a total of 560. +Mr. John Benjamin Smith (who very likely refreshed his memory by looking +up records when writing his Reminiscences) gives the same result. Mr. J. +C. Hobhouse, speaking in the House of Commons, on May 19th, 1821, said +that "he held in his hand a list of killed and wounded running to 25-30 +sheets, and defied them to disprove it." It is clear, then, that these +estimates are quoted from the Committee's Report, and to this it will be +well now to turn. + +With the kind assistance of Mr. Swann, of the Reference Library, I have +been able to find one (and only one) copy of this Report. It is bound up +with a series of papers catalogued as "Lancashire and Yorkshire Tracts," +at the Manchester Reference Library. (The Reference number is "Lancashire +and Yorkshire Tracts; Barlow's Historical Collector. H. 63. 3. No. 3 +(15104)"). It is entitled: "Report of the Metropolitan and Central +Committee appointed for the Relief of the Manchester Sufferers, with an +Appendix containing the names of the sufferers and the nature and extent +of their injuries; also an account of the distribution of funds, and other +documents. Published by order of the Committee. London, 1820." This +Committee seems to have been formed by amalgamating several organisations +in the metropolis which sprang into being as a result of public sympathy +with the sufferers, and it worked in conjunction with the Manchester and +other Lancashire Committees. The subscriptions recorded to date amount to +£3,408 1s. 8d. of which £1,206 13s. 8d. had been distributed, £250 having +been received from the local Manchester Committees. The amount expended on +law charges and expenses of witnesses is given as £1,077 6s. 9d.; +advertisements and sundries cost £355 13s. 6d.; and this leaves a balance +of over £768, which is pronounced inadequate to deal with the cases that +remain. A fresh appeal is therefore made to the British Public. A +Deputation was sent from London to investigate cases, and this Deputation +reports, in January, 1820, that out of 420 sufferers visited and relieved +113 are females; that 130 received severe sabre-cuts, 14 of these being +females. (To be quite safe, we must admit the possibility that the term +"sufferers" may sometimes include members of the families of those killed +or injured.) There follow 38 pages filled with the names of those killed +and wounded at Peterloo, some 430 in all, with full details of their +injuries, and in the case of the former the description is "Killed, _or_, +who have subsequently died in consequence of injuries there received," the +number of these being given as eleven. Of these eleven: two were "sabred;" +one was "sabred and trampled upon;" one was "sabred and stabbed;" one +"sabred and crushed;" two (one of them a woman) "rode over by the +cavalry;" one "trampled by the cavalry;" one "inwardly crushed;" and one +(a woman) "thrown into a cellar." In the case of two of these the words +are added "killed on the spot." The child killed in Cooper Street +completes the total. + +One of the Relief Committees met at Mr. Prentice's warehouse, and the care +with which the various cases were investigated, and successive grants made +from the funds of the different Committees, is clearly shown by the +details given in the account-book secured by Mr. Guppy in 1919 for the +Rylands Library, which is mentioned above. + +Perhaps it will never be possible to say exactly how many were left dead +on the field. One, at anyrate, who died at once, or very shortly +afterwards, was (by a strange irony) a Special Constable, and this is +probably the "one man killed" of some of the accounts. It will be +remembered that Lieut. Jolliffe reported "two women not likely to recover; +one man in a dying state; and two or three reputed dead;" in the letter +quoted above, describing his visit to the Infirmary on the Sunday +following the event. + +Most of the cases investigated by the Committees belonged to the side of +the Reformers; but it must not be forgotten that the other side claimed to +have serious casualties. Mr. Francis Phillips, _e.g._, enumerates the +casualties to the troops, and an estimate of these is given also in the +Centenary Volume of the Cheshire Yeomanry; we have already seen above, +moreover, that a subscription list was opened for the families of the +Special Constables, and that the appeal met with a generous response. It +is a curious feature of the case that each side seems to be anxious to +make its casualty list as imposing as possible. An interesting summary of +the various estimates is given by MacDonnell in his _State Trials_. This +summary includes the Official Report from the Infirmary, and the list of +casualties to the troops. Without pursuing the matter further, we may say +that a careful examination of the somewhat confusing evidence would seem +to show that the estimate "eleven killed and between 500 and 600 wounded" +will not prove to be far wrong, provided that (1) we understand "killed" +to include those who died as the result of injuries received on the field; +(2) we include in the general total the casualties incurred during the +disturbances some hours later in the neighbourhood of New Cross. At least +one list, published subsequently, brings the total of killed up to +fourteen. + + * * * * * + +Two points not directly concerned with this discussion are dealt with by +the Relief Committee, and are sufficiently interesting to be recorded: (1) +The Committee paid out £710 "on account of the Trial at York; the +Manchester Committee voting £100 for the same object." (2) The Deputation +sent from London to investigate the cases, mentioned in their Report some +striking details of the conditions of life amongst the operatives. To +quote only two sentences: "in no one instance among the weavers did your +Deputation see a morsel of animal food, and they ascertained that in most +families where there were children the taste of meat was unknown from one +year to another." "Six shillings a week was the average wage of an +able-bodied and industrious weaver. Many could not get this." + + +2.--PRESENCE OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN AT PETERLOO. + +It has often been asserted that the peaceful intentions of the crowd at +Peterloo are attested by the presence among them of women and young +children. As every detail of evidence is of value, I give here a sentence +from a letter which I received from Principal Reynolds: "My father was +there, in his mother's arms, though only one year old; so my grandmother +told me." + + +3.--SOME GLEANINGS FROM THE SCRAP-BOOKS. + +It was the custom in the early decades of the nineteenth century, when +newspapers were dear and newspaper files were not available, as there were +no free libraries, to collect newspaper cuttings and illustrations, with +tracts and "broadsides," election squibs and so forth, in large +scrap-books. Thus, at the Peel Park Library is preserved the scrap-book of +Joseph Brotherton (for many years Member for Salford), running to over +forty volumes. The Greaves scrap-book at the Reference Library contains a +valuable collection of this kind. The Owen collection at the same Library +fills over eighty volumes. At the Chetham Library may be seen Lord +Ellesmere's scrap-book and a number of others. From many references to +Peterloo in these books we may select the three items which follow: The +Greaves collection contains a rare print of Peterloo, somewhat lurid in +its detail. Mr. Albert Nicholson has in his possession a highly-coloured +copy of this, which he has shown me. No other copies seem to be known. + +I have to thank Mr. J. J. Phelps for calling my attention to two papers in +a scrap-book at the Chetham Library which he conjectures to have been that +of Mr. Francis Phillips, the protagonist on behalf of the magistrates, and +the author of _An Exposure of the Calumnies, &c._ One of these is the +actual subpoena which Mr. Phillips received, summoning him to give +evidence in the trial at York: "there to testify the truth on our behalf +against Henry Hunt and others for certain misdemeanours whereof they are +indicted." (MS. B. 9. 41. 110. p. 43.). + +The other paper is of some importance as it fixes the date of the +embodiment of the Manchester Yeomanry. In _The Story of Peterloo_ (p. 13) +some details are given in support of a conjecture that the corps was +formed later than March in 1817. The scrap-book just quoted confirms this +conjecture, for there appears a printed copy of a letter addressed to the +Boroughreeves and Constables of Manchester and Salford, and bearing over a +hundred signatures (that of Mr. Phillips coming second), asking that a +meeting may be convened with the object of forming such a corps. In +response to this appeal the Boroughreeves and Constables summoned a +meeting for the purpose, in a letter dated Manchester, June the 16th, +1817. (MS B. 9. 41. 110. p. 22). With this date as a guide, it was easy to +find in the advertisement columns of _Wheeler's Manchester Chronicle_ for +Saturday, June the 21st, 1817, a copy of both letters, a list of the +signatures, and the announcement that the proposed meeting was actually +held on June the 19th, 1817, when it was resolved: "that under the present +circumstances it is expedient to form a body of Yeomanry Cavalry in the +Towns and neighbourhood of Manchester and Salford." Details follow as to +Government allowances for uniform, etc., and as to the possibility of +amalgamating with similar corps in the surrounding towns, should such be +formed. Each man was to provide his own horse. + +This information has an important bearing on the tragedy of Peterloo, and +taken in conjunction with the Resolution of the Magistrates mentioned in +_The Story of Peterloo_ (p. 13), leaves no doubt as to what was the nature +of the "present circumstances" that called the corps into being. + + +4.--EXPLANATION OF THE CONTEMPORARY PLAN AND PICTURE OF PETERLOO. + +(_a_) The Contemporary Plan of St. Peter's Field which appears on the +following page was published in Farquharson's verbatim Report of the Trial +in 1822. As the lettering is small, some explanation is necessary. + +The shaded area in the centre represents the open space on which the +tragedy was enacted. To the south of it is clearly seen the "raised +ground" mentioned by Stanley, and shown also in his Plan. The windmill +which stood near, and gave its name to Windmill Street, had disappeared +some years before. The site of it is now occupied by the Central Station +Approach. + +On the shaded space are marked: "Hustings;" "Carriage" (_i.e._, Mr. Hunt's +carriage, marked also on Stanley's Plan); the double line of "Constables;" +and the "Manchester Yeomanry," drawn up in front of the row of houses in +Mount Street, labelled: "Magistrates assembled here." The Friends' Meeting +House is marked "Quaker's Meeting House," and the enclosing wall is stated +to measure in height "3 ft. 7 in. on the inside" and "10 ft. 3 in. on the +outside." These measurements would be inserted, probably, in connection +with the statement that one of the Cavalry jumped his horse over this +wall. Apparently a gate and posts cross Mount Street in front of the +Meeting House, and lead into "St. Peter's Field," across which two dotted +lines indicate the _projected_ line of Peter Street. + + +[Illustration: Plan of Peterloo. From Farquharson's Report of the Trial, +1822. (See page 88.) + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher._] + + +The position of the Troops and the line of their approach to the Field are +shown as follows: The "31st Infantry" are drawn up in Brazennose Street, +the upper end of which is also blocked with a gate and posts; the "88th +Infantry" are lined up in Dickinson Street; in Portland Street are the +"Manchester Yeomanry," and their course is shown by a dotted line up +Portland Street, along Nicholas Street, down Cooper Street, and then round +the corner of Cooper's garden wall (now the site of the north-western +corner of the Midland Hotel) into Mount Street; the Plan stating that "The +Manchester Yeomanry came this way to the ground;" another troop of the +"Manchester Yeomanry" is drawn up in front of St. John's Church, in Byrom +Street; facing them, in the same street, are shown the "15th Hussars" in +two sections, presumably representing the "two squadrons" mentioned by +Lieutenant Jolliffe in his letter; lastly, the "Cheshire Yeomanry" are +drawn up in St. John's Street, off Deansgate, and the line of approach of +all these mounted troops is shown by a dotted line passing along Byrom +Street, St. John's Street, southward down Deansgate, then along Fleet +Street, up Lower Mosley Street, and along the "raised ground" already +mentioned to St. Peter's Field, the inscription on the Plan reading: "The +15th Hussars, one troop of the Manchester and Cheshire Yeomanry came this +way to the ground." The artillery are not shewn. + +The scale of yards given on the Plan shows that Stanley's estimate of a +hundred yards as the distance from Mr. Buxton's house to the Hustings was +exactly correct. + +(_b_) Wroe's Contemporary Picture of Peterloo, which is shewn on the +following page, is perhaps the best of a number of sketches extant. The +details are fairly accurate. In the background, on the extreme left, is +seen (to quote Bamford) "the corner of a garden wall, round which the +Manchester Yeomanry, in blue and white uniform, came trotting, sword in +hand, to the front of a row of new houses." The "corner" is on the site of +the north-western corner of the Midland Hotel. The "new houses" were on +the site of the present Midland Buffet. Mr. Ewart's factory, in the +distance, was just off Lower Mosley Street. The row of houses to the right +of this, in the background, was on the upper side of Windmill Street. The +Hustings are on the site of the south-eastern corner of the Free Trade +Hall. Standing on them we may distinguish Mr. Hunt and the Leader of the +Manchester Female Reformers. Around them are the Banners of the various +contingents; we may even make out the legend "No Corn Laws" on the one in +front. The Banner-poles are shaped to resemble caps of Liberty, as shown +in another of our illustrations. The crowd are occupying the site of the +Free Trade Hall, the Theatre Royal, the Y.M.C.A., the Gaiety, and a number +of adjoining buildings. + + +[Illustration: A VIEW OF St PETER'S PLACE + +_To face page 90_] + + +The moment seized by the artist for his picture is that in which the +Manchester Yeomanry, many of whom are scattered and entangled among the +crowd, have reached the Hustings, while in the distance the Hussars can +just be seen lining up in Mount Street and charging to their relief. The +crowd, consisting of men, women and children, are seen dispersing in all +directions. + +The view might be imagined to have been taken from the roof of a building +which then occupied the site of the present Albert Hall, in Peter Street. +Other contemporary prints include St. Peter's Church and the Friends' +Meeting House in the picture. + + + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[1] I met Mr. Buxton on the steps of his house, not at all aware till then +that his _residence_ was at or near the place of meeting. I had been +directed to his _shop_, considerably beyond the square, to which I was +proceeding. I state this to prove that what I afterwards saw was purely +accidental, and that I had no previous intention of witnessing in detail +the transactions of the day. As I came from the bottom of Alport Street, +on the Altrincham side of Manchester, my original directions were indeed +to pass through St. Peter's field as the shortest line, but I had taken a +circuitous route to avoid the meeting, which led me to the corner of it +near Mr. Buxton's house. + +[2] It has been stated, upon evidence which I should be unwilling to +discredit, that the body of persons more immediately in contact with the +hustings were of Hunt's party. My reasons for believing them at the time +to be (as I was told) special constables, were because they resembled them +in appearance, were connected in their lines, had their hats on, and +staves of office occasionally appeared amongst them. Mr. Hay, in his +official letter, says: "A body of special constables took their ground, +about two hundred in number, close to the hustings, from whence there was +a line of communication to the house where we were." This is precisely my +view of the case; doubtless, had the communication been cut, he would have +noticed it. + +[3] Some, by being better mounted or rather in advance, might have been +more moderate in their pace, but generally speaking it was very rapid, and +I use the word gallop, as conveying the best idea of their approach. + +[4] I am particular in mentioning these minute circumstances, because in +this and some other points in which I could not be mistaken, I have been +strongly contradicted. + +[5] It has been often asked when and where the cavalry struck the people. +I can only say that from the moment they began to force their way through +the crowd towards the hustings swords were up and swords were down, but +whether they fell with the sharp or flat side, of course I cannot pretend +to give an opinion. + +[6] On quitting the ground I for the first time observed that strong +bodies of infantry were posted in the streets, on opposite sides of the +square; their appearance might probably have increased the alarm and would +certainly have impeded the progress of a mob wishing to retreat in either +of those directions. When I saw them they were resting on their arms, and +I believe they remained stationary, taking no part in the transaction. + +[7] On entering Mosley Street at 12 o'clock I stopped to question some +persons on the footway respecting the proceedings of the day. When about +to proceed, I was recommended to move from the middle of the street to the +path, as the mob were advancing. I declined, suspecting my advisers might +be radicals, adding: "I am on the King's highway, and shall remain where I +am." I mention this because I have heard it reported that I was insulted +by the Ashton people, which may have originated from the above account. + +[8] [In the copy of Farquharson's verbatim Report of the Trial, which is +preserved at the Reference Library, Manchester, this "not" is omitted. The +omission is, of course, due to a misprint, and someone has inserted "not" +in pencil. Similarly, in my own copy of Farquharson's Report, someone has +inserted the "not" in ink. McDonnell, in his "State Trials," inserted the +"not." Mr. McKennell's evidence, as reported in Farquharson, is as follows +(pp. 169, 170; he was cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant Hullock):-- + +By whom was the Riot Act read? + +--I never heard it read. + +You heard no such thing? + +--I did not. + +EDITOR.] + +[9] [St. John Street or Byrom Street.--EDITOR.] + +[10] [South-east would be more correct.--EDITOR.] + +[11] [East would be more correct. The Cheshire Yeomanry filed along the +south side. The arrows in Stanley's Plan make this clear.--EDITOR.] + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Three Accounts of Peterloo, by +Edward Stanley and William Jolliffe and John Benjamin Smith + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THREE ACCOUNTS OF PETERLOO *** + +***** This file should be named 37004-8.txt or 37004-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/0/0/37004/ + +Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images +generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian +Libraries.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/37004-8.zip b/37004-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a3d805f --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-8.zip diff --git a/37004-h.zip b/37004-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6f2b7e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h.zip diff --git a/37004-h/37004-h.htm b/37004-h/37004-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..26f2dea --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/37004-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2899 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Three Accounts of Peterloo, edited by F. A. Bruton. + </title> + + <style type="text/css"> + + p {margin-top: .75em; text-align: justify; margin-bottom: .75em;} + + body {margin-left: 12%; margin-right: 12%;} + + .pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; font-size: smaller; text-align: right; font-style: normal;} + + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {text-align: center; clear: both;} + + hr {width: 33%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; clear: both;} + + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;} + .dent {padding-left: 2em;} + .dent2 {padding-left: 4em;} + + .giant {font-size: 200%} + .huge {font-size: 150%} + .large {font-size: 125%} + + .blockquot {margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;} + .note {margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%;} + + .right {text-align: right;} + .center {text-align: center;} + + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + + .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center;} + + .bbox {border: solid 2px; color: gray; margin: auto; text-align: center;} + + p.dropcap:first-letter{float: left; padding-right: 3px; font-size: 250%; line-height: 83%; width:auto;} + .caps {text-transform:uppercase;} + + a:link {color:#0000ff; text-decoration:none} + a:visited {color:#6633cc; text-decoration:none} + + .spacer {padding-left: 1em; padding-right: 1em;} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Three Accounts of Peterloo, by +Edward Stanley and William Jolliffe and John Benjamin Smith + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Three Accounts of Peterloo + By Eyewitnesses Bishop Stanley, Lord Hylton, John Benjamin + Smith with Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the Trial + +Author: Edward Stanley + William Jolliffe + John Benjamin Smith + +Editor: F. A. Bruton + +Release Date: August 7, 2011 [EBook #37004] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THREE ACCOUNTS OF PETERLOO *** + + + + +Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images +generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian +Libraries.) + + + + + + +</pre> + + + + +<p class="center">PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER</p> +<p> </p> +<p class="center">HISTORICAL SERIES<br /> +No. XXXIX.</p> +<p> </p> +<p class="center"><span class="huge">THREE ACCOUNTS OF<br />PETERLOO.</span></p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<p class="center">Published by the University of Manchester at<br /> +THE UNIVERSITY PRESS (<span class="smcap">H. M. McKechnie</span>, M.A., Secretary)<br /> +<span class="smcap">12 Lime Grove, Oxford Road, MANCHESTER</span><br /> +<br /> +LONGMANS, GREEN & CO.<br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">London</span>:<br /> +39 Paternoster Row, E.C.4<br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">New York</span>:<br /> +443-449 Fourth Avenue and Thirtieth Street<br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Bombay</span>:<br /> +336 Hornby Road<br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Calcutta</span>:<br /> +6 Old Court House Street<br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Madras</span>:<br /> +167 Mount Road</p> + + +<p> </p><p><a name="frontis" id="frontis"></a> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/frontis.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<i>From a Print lent by Lord Sheffield</i><span class="spacer"> </span><i>Photo by R. H. Fletcher</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Bishop Stanley</span><br /> +1779-1849<br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 20em;"><i>Frontispiece</i></span></div> + + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<p class="center"><span class="giant">Three Accounts</span><br /> +OF<br /> +<span class="giant">Peterloo</span></p> +<p> </p> +<p class="center"><span class="large">BY EYEWITNESSES</span></p> +<p> </p> +<p class="center">BISHOP STANLEY<br /> +LORD HYLTON<br /> +JOHN BENJAMIN SMITH</p> +<p> </p> +<p class="center">with</p> +<p class="center"><span class="huge">Bishop Stanley’s Evidence at the Trial</span></p> +<p> </p> +<p class="center">Edited by F. A. BRUTON, M.A., Litt.D<br /> +of the Manchester Grammar School</p> +<p> </p><p> </p> +<p class="center">MANCHESTER:<br /> +AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS</p> +<p class="center">LONGMANS, GREEN & CO.<br /> +LONDON, NEW YORK, BOMBAY, etc.<br /> +1921</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p class="center"><span class="large">PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="large">No. CXL.</span></p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[Pg v]</a></span></p> +<h2><span class="smcap">Contents.</span></h2> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" summary="table"> +<tr><td> </td><td align="right"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr> +<tr><td>Introduction</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_vii">vii</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Bishop Stanley</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Stanley’s Account of Peterloo</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_10">10</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Stanley’s Evidence at the Trial in 1822</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_24">24</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Sir William Jolliffe, afterwards Lord Hylton</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_45">45</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Lieutenant Jolliffe’s Account of Peterloo</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>John Benjamin Smith</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_59">59</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Mr. J. B. Smith’s Account of Peterloo</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_62">62</a></td></tr> +<tr><td> </td></tr> +<tr><td>APPENDIX A</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_75">75</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent">Some Relics of Peterloo:—</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">1. A Banner carried at Peterloo.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">2. Bamford’s Cottage at Middleton.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">3. Constables’ Staves.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">4. Head of Flagstaff.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">5. Hussar’s Plume.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">6. Account-Book of the Relief Committee.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">7. Account-Book recording amounts raised for the relief of Special Constables and their families.</td></tr> +<tr><td> </td></tr> +<tr><td>APPENDIX B</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_81">81</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">1. Note on the Casualties at Peterloo.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">2. Presence of women and children at Peterloo.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">3. Some gleanings from the Scrap-Books.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="dent2">4. Explanation of the Contemporary Plan and Picture of Peterloo.</td></tr></table> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[Pg vi]</a></span></p> +<h2><span class="smcap">Illustrations.</span></h2> + +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" summary="table"> +<tr><td> </td><td align="right"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr> +<tr><td>Portrait of Bishop Stanley</td> + <td colspan="2" align="right"><a href="#frontis"><i>Frontispiece</i></a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Stanley’s Plan of Peterloo</td> + <td> </td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_8">8</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Nadin, the Deputy Constable</td> + <td><i>Facing</i></td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_21">21</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>“Orator Hunt”</td> + <td align="center">"</td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_27">27</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Plan of Peterloo, compiled from the contemporary Plans and modern Street Maps</td> + <td> </td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_44">44</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Portrait of Mr. John Benjamin Smith</td> + <td><i>Facing</i></td> + <td align="right"><a href="#facing_59">59</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>The Hunt Memorial at the Manchester Reform Club</td> + <td align="center">"</td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_69">69</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>The Peterloo Medal</td> + <td align="center">"</td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_71">71</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>The Banner carried at Peterloo by the Middleton Contingent</td> + <td align="center">"</td> + <td align="right"><a href="#facing_75">75</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Samuel Bamford’s Cottage at Middleton</td> + <td align="center">"</td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_76">76</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Three Relics picked up on the Field of Peterloo</td> + <td align="center">"</td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_77">77</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>A Page of the Relief Committee’s Account Book</td> + <td> </td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_79">79</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Plan of Peterloo published with the Report of the Trial in 1822</td> + <td> </td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_89">89</a></td></tr> +<tr><td>Wroe’s Picture of Peterloo, showing the Manchester Yeomanry riding for the Hustings </td> + <td><i>Facing</i></td> + <td align="right"><a href="#Page_90">90</a></td></tr></table> + + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</a></span></p> +<h2><span class="smcap">Introduction.</span></h2> + +<p> </p> +<p class="dropcap"><span class="caps">Of</span> the three accounts of the Tragedy of Peterloo given here, two (the +first and third) have never been published before. The second appeared in +the “Life of Lord Sidmouth” in 1847. All three, written with care and +judgment, by men who afterwards rose to eminence, form a valuable +contribution to the understanding of an event, the accounts of which have +been for the most part distorted and misleading. Moreover, as each of the +three writers deals with a different phase of the day’s happenings, the +accounts complement one another.</p> + +<p>The Editor had already arranged for the publication of the first, when he +received the following letter from Lord Sheffield, dated Penrhos, +Holyhead, August 21st, 1919:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“It is many years since I had the copy of the Rev. E. Stanley’s +report, and no doubt it was one of the lithographed copies you +mention.</p> + +<p>I think it would be well if it were published, along with the evidence +to which you refer. I also think the Plan, of which you speak, should +be added, and the reports of Jolliffe and J. B. Smith.”</p></div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</a></span>Lord Sheffield supported his suggestion by enclosing a cheque towards the +cost of printing, and this made easy the publication of the whole. Lord +Sheffield also kindly lent the portrait of Bishop Stanley, which appears +as the Frontispiece.</p> + +<p>Acknowledgments are due, besides: (1) to Mr. Henry Guppy, M.A., for +permission to use the blocks of Wroe’s picture of Peterloo, and the Plan +from the “Story of Peterloo” in the Bulletin of the John Rylands Library +for October, 1919; and to copy a page of the Account-book of the Relief +Committee; (2) to Lady Durning Lawrence, who (with the late Mr. C. W. +Sutton, M.A.) gave permission to print the Extract from the Reminiscences +of Mr. J. B. Smith, and to reproduce his portrait; (3) to Mr. W. Marcroft +of Southport; and Messrs. Hirst & Rennie of Oldham, for the loan of the +blocks of “Orator Hunt,” the “Hunt Memorial,” and the “Peterloo Medal”; +(4) to Mr. John Murray for leave to reprint Lieutenant Jolliffe’s letter; +(5) to Mr. W. W. Manfield, for the loan of the three Relics of Peterloo; +and (6) to Mr. R. H. Fletcher, amateur photographer, of Eccles, for +photographing the relics, etc.</p> + +<p><span style="margin-left: 8em;">F. A. B.</span></p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p> +<h2>Three Accounts of Peterloo</h2> +<p> </p> +<p class="center"><span class="large">BISHOP STANLEY</span></p> + +<p> </p> +<p class="dropcap"><span class="caps">The</span> Rev. Edward Stanley (1779-1849) was the second son of Sir J. T. +Stanley, the Sixth Baronet, and Margaret Owen, of Penrhos, Anglesey. His +elder brother was the first Baron Stanley of Alderley. As a boy, he had a +natural inclination for the sea, but this was not encouraged. For +thirty-two years he was Rector of Alderley, in Cheshire. While making +himself beloved as a Parish Priest, he found time for many scientific and +other interests. His <i>Familiar History of Birds</i> is a standard work; he +advocated, and assisted in, the teaching of Science and Temperance at +Alderley; and he became one of the first Presidents of the Manchester +Statistical Society. Though he declined the See of Manchester, when it was +offered him, he accepted from Lord Melbourne, in 1837, the Bishopric of +Norwich, and introduced a number of reforms into that diocese. A short +memoir of him was written by his son, the famous Dean of Westminster.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span>At the date of Peterloo, a number of clergymen sat on the Bench of +Magistrates for Lancashire and Cheshire, but Stanley stated clearly at the +Trial that he was not a Magistrate. He was then forty years of age, and +Rector of Alderley, and in his evidence he was careful to say that his +narrative of Peterloo was compiled about two months after the event, for +private circulation among his friends, and had never been published. It is +clear that a copy was in the hands of Counsel who cross-examined him at +the Trial in 1822. The manuscript is very neatly written (I should +conjecture by Stanley himself) on nine large quarto pages, the plan being +drawn by the same hand, and the notes given at the end. I have thought it +more convenient for the reader to have the notes thrown to the foot of the +respective pages. The manuscript was lithographed, in 1819, by the +Lithographic Press, Westminster, and entered at Stationers’ Hall. I found +on enquiry that there was one copy in the Manuscript Department of the +British Museum (Add. MSS., 30142, ff. 78-83). It is addressed to +Major-Gen. Sir Robert Wilson, and sealed with the Stanley crest. The +authorship was not known, and the Keeper of the MSS. was glad to be able +to add this to the document as the result of my communication. In the +Printed Book Department of the British Museum there is a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span> second copy, +catalogued under Manchester, with press-mark 8133i. There is no trace of +Stanley’s MS. in the Public Records Office. I can find no other copy but +the one at the Manchester Reference Library, which is in excellent +preservation, and has recently been rebound. Mr. J. C. Hobhouse quoted +from Stanley’s narrative once in a speech in the House of Commons. +Speaking on May 19th, 1821, in support of a Petition for an enquiry as to +the outrage at Manchester, Mr. Hobhouse, following Sir Francis Burdett, +said: “The Rev. Mr. Stanley, who watched from a room above the +magistrates, saw no stones or sticks used, though if any stone larger than +a pebble had been thrown, he must have seen it.” I have not found any +other reference to the narrative except that made by Counsel at the Trial, +and that is recorded in the Evidence which follows.</p> + +<hr style="width: 25%;" /> + +<p>Three notes may find a place here. The first two refer to points mentioned +by Stanley:—</p> + +<p>1. Pigot and Dean’s <i>Manchester Directory</i> for 1819 mentions:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(<i>a</i>) Edmund Buxton, Builder, &c., No. 6, Mount Street, Dickinson +Street.</p> + +<p>(<i>b</i>) Thomas & Matthew Pickford & Co., Carriers, Oxford Street.</p></div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span>I do not find Mr. Buxton’s “shop,” which is mentioned by Stanley; nor are +Pickfords described as “timber merchants,” though timber may easily have +been stacked in their yard.</p> + +<p>Stanley’s movements on reaching Manchester are not, at a first reading, +quite clear. Riding in from Alderley, he seems to have approached by way +of Oxford Road, passing (as he tells us) the Manchester Yeomanry, posted +at Pickford’s yard. At twelve o’clock, he turned up Mosley Street (very +likely to avoid the crowd which was already filling the Square) and in +Mosley Street he met the contingent of Reformers coming from Ashton. He +then proceeded to Mr. Buxton’s <i>shop</i>, which seems to have been near the +lower end of Deansgate. Not finding Mr. Buxton there, he was directed to +his <i>residence</i> in Mount Street. The shortest way to Mount Street from +Alport would have taken him through the crowd. He therefore approached +Mount Street “by a circuitous route to avoid the meeting” (possibly by +Fleet Street and Lower Mosley Street, the route afterwards taken by the +Hussars), and met Mr. Buxton on the steps of his house.</p> + +<p>Stanley evidently knew little of Manchester. He confesses in his narrative +that he had not been in St. Peter’s field before or since the tragedy; in +his evidence he said: “I know no street,” and stated that he could not +locate the Friends’ Meeting-house.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span>2. Stanley’s estimate of a hundred yards, as the distance from the +hustings to Mr. Buxton’s house can be demonstrated to-day to be almost +exactly correct. This is only one of many points in his narrative which +show what a shrewd, quick, and accurate observer he was. When Mr. Hulton +was asked, at the Trial, to estimate the same distance, he conjectured +four hundred yards, and this was actually quoted as the distance in one of +the standard histories of the period.</p> + +<p>For the rest, it seems better to leave Stanley’s extremely lucid account +to speak for itself. To annotate it in detail would be to spoil its +completeness. As has been stated above, each observer witnessed the scene +from his own stand-point. A complete picture can only be obtained by +forming a mosaic of the various reports. Stanley’s narrative is that of an +outsider, who came upon the scene unexpectedly, and watched the whole with +the eye of a statesman and a statistician. Lieutenant Jolliffe’s account +gives the view of a young soldier, a stranger to Manchester, who rode in +the charge of the Hussars, and afterwards took part with them in the +patrol of the town. Mr. J. B. Smith speaks from the point of view of a +Manchester business man, familiar with the civic and economic conditions +that led to the catastrophe, and his narrative reaches a few days beyond +the tragedy itself.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span> Samuel Bamford’s account—too well-known to need +repetition here—was written from the stand-point of a local weaver, who +had already suffered for his outspoken advocacy of Parliamentary Reform, +had a large share in organising the Peterloo meeting, and served a term of +imprisonment for his share in the proceedings. An attempt to dovetail +these and other Reports into a continuous narrative has already been made +in <i>The Story of Peterloo</i> (Rylands Library Lectures, 1919.).</p> + +<p>3. Stanley’s Evidence at the Trial, which is here printed immediately +after his connected narrative, has been taken from McDonnell’s <i>State +Trials</i>, supplemented—where passages are omitted by McDonnell—by +Farquharson’s verbatim report, issued by the Defence after the Trial. As a +matter of fact McDonnell made use of Farquharson’s version.</p> + +<hr style="width: 25%;" /> + +<p>The portrait of Bishop Stanley which appears here is from a print kindly +lent for the purpose by Lord Sheffield.</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span></p> +<h2>Stanley’s Notes attached to his Plan</h2> + +<p>Never having seen St. Peter’s fields before or since, I cannot pretend to +speak accurately as to distance, etc. I should, at a guess, state the +distance from the hustings to Mr. Buxton’s house to be about a hundred +yards, which may serve as a general scale to the rest of the plan.</p> + + +<p class="center"><br /><span class="smcap">Key to Stanley’s Plan.</span></p> + +<p>1. The hustings. The arrow shows the direction in which the orators +addressed the mob, the great majority being in front: F, F, F.</p> + +<p>2. The Barouche in which Hunt arrived, the line from it showing its +entrance and approach.</p> + +<p>3. The spot on which the Manchester Yeomanry Cavalry halted previous to +their charge; the dotted lines in front showing the direction of their +charge on attacking the hustings.</p> + +<p> <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span></p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/page8_tmb.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<a href="images/page8.jpg"><small>Larger Image</small></a><br /> +Stanley’s Plan</div> +<p> </p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span>4. On this spot the woman alluded to in the account (<a href="#Page_15">p. 15</a>) was wounded +and remained apparently dead, till removed at the conclusion of the +business.</p> + +<p>5. Here the 15th Dragoons paused for a few moments before they proceeded +in the direction marked by the dotted line.</p> + +<p>6. The Cheshire Cavalry; my attention was so much taken up with the +proceedings of the Manchester Yeomanry Cavalry, etc., and the dispersion +in front of the hustings, that I cannot speak accurately as to their +subsequent movements.</p> + +<p>7, 7, 7. The band of special constables, <i>apparently</i> surrounding the +hustings.</p> + +<p>8, 8, 8. The mob in dense mass; their banners displayed in different +parts, as at x, x.</p> + +<p>9, 9, 9. A space comparatively vacant; partially occupied by stragglers; +the mob condensing near the hustings for the purpose of seeing and +hearing.</p> + +<p>10, 10, 10. Raised ground on which many spectators had taken a position; a +commotion amongst them first announced the approach of the cavalry; their +elevated situation commanding a more extensive view.</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span></p> +<h2>Bishop Stanley’s Account of Peterloo</h2> + +<p>Soon after one o’clock on the 16th of August, I went to call on Mr. +Buxton, with whom I had some private business. I was directed to his house +overlooking St. Peter’s field, where I unexpectedly found the magistrates +assembled.<a name='fna_1' id='fna_1' href='#f_1'><small>[1]</small></a> I went up to their room, and remained there seven or eight +minutes. Hunt was not then arrived; a murmur running through the crowd +prepared us for his approach; a numerous vanguard preceded him, and in a +few moments the Barouche appeared in which he sat with his coadjutors, +male and female;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span> a tremendous shout instantly welcomed him; he proceeded +slowly towards the hustings. On approaching the knot of constables the +carriage stopped a short time, I conceive from the difficulty of making +way through a band of men who were little inclined to fall back for his +admission. The Barouche at length attained its position close to the +hustings, and the speakers stepped forth, the female—as far as I can +recollect—still remaining on the driver’s seat with a banner in her hand. +I then left the magistrates and went to a room immediately above them, +commanding a bird’s-eye view of the whole area, in which every movement +and every object was distinctly visible. In the centre were the hustings +surrounded <i>to all appearance</i><a name='fna_2' id='fna_2' href='#f_2'><small>[2]</small></a> by +a numerous body of constables,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span> +easily distinguished by their respectable dress, staves of office, and +hats <i>on</i>; the elevation of the hustings of course eclipsed a portion of +the space immediately beyond them, so as to prevent my seeing, and +consequently asserting positively, whether they were completely surrounded +by this chain of constables. The chain from this its main body was +continued in a double line, two or three deep, forming an avenue to Mr. +Buxton’s house, by which <i>there seemed to be</i> free and uninterrupted +access to and from the hustings. Had any interruption of their +communication occurred previous to the change, I think I must have +perceived it from the commanding position I occupied. A vast concourse of +people, in a close and compact mass, surrounded the hustings and +constables, pressing upon each other apparently with a view to be as near +the speakers as possible. They were, generally speaking, bare-headed, +probably for the purpose of giving those behind them a better view. +Between the outside of this mob and the sides of the area the space was +comparatively unoccupied; stragglers were indeed numerous, but not so as +to amount to anything like a crowd, or to create interruption to foot +passengers. Round the edges of the square more compact masses of people +were assembled, the greater part of whom appeared to be spectators. The +radical banners and caps of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span> liberty were conspicuous in different parts +of the concentrated mob, stationed according to the order in which the +respective bands to which they belonged had entered the ground, and taken +up their positions.</p> + +<p>After the orators had ascended the hustings, a few minutes were taken up +in preparing for the business of the day, and then Hunt began his address. +I could distinctly hear his voice, but was too distant to distinguish his +words. He had not spoken above a minute or two before I heard a report in +the room that the cavalry were sent for; the messengers, we were told, +might be seen from a back window. I ran to that window from which I could +see the road leading to a timber yard (I believe) at no great distance, +where, as I entered the town, I had observed the Manchester Yeomanry +stationed. I saw three horsemen ride off, one towards the timber yard, the +others in the direction which I knew led to the cantonments of other +cavalry.</p> + +<p>I immediately returned to the front window, anxiously awaiting the result; +a slight commotion among a body of spectators, chiefly women, who occupied +a mound of raised, broken ground on the left, and to the rear, of the +orators, convinced me they saw something which excited their fears; many +jumped down, and they soon dispersed more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span> rapidly. By this time the alarm +was quickly spreading, and I heard several voices exclaiming: “The +soldiers! the soldiers!”; another moment brought the cavalry into the +field on a gallop,<a name='fna_3' id='fna_3' href='#f_3'><small>[3]</small></a> which they continued till the word was given for +halting them, about the middle of the space which I before noticed as +partially occupied by stragglers.</p> + +<p>They halted in great disorder, and so continued for the few minutes they +remained on that spot. This disorder was attributed by several persons in +the room to the undisciplined state of their horses, little accustomed to +act together, and probably frightened by the shout of the populace, which +greeted their arrival. Hunt had evidently seen their approach; his hand +had been pointed towards them, and it was clear from his gestures that he +was addressing the mob respecting their interference. His words, whatever +they were, excited a shout from those immediately about him, which was +re-echoed with fearful animation by the rest of the multitude. Ere that +had subsided, the cavalry, the loyal spectators, and the special<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a></span> +constables, cheered loudly in return, and a pause ensued of about a minute +or two.</p> + +<p>An officer and some few others then advanced rather in front of the troop, +formed, as I before said, in much disorder and with scarcely the semblance +of line, their sabres glistened in the air, and on they went, direct for +the hustings. At first, <i>i.e.</i>, for a very few paces, their movement was +not rapid, and there was some show of an attempt to follow their officer +in regular succession, five or six abreast; but, as Mr. Francis Phillips +in his pamphlet observes, they soon “increased their speed,” and with a +zeal and ardour which might naturally be expected from men acting with +delegated power against a foe by whom it is understood they had long been +insulted with taunts of cowardice, continued their course, seeming +individually to vie with each other which should be first. Some +stragglers, I have remarked, occupied the space in which they halted. On +the commencement of the charge, these fled in all directions; and I +presume escaped, with the exception of a woman who had been standing ten +or twelve yards in front; as the troop passed her body was left, to all +appearance lifeless; and there remained till the close of the business, +when, as it was no great distance from the house, I went towards her. Two +men were then in the act of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span> raising her up; whether she was actually dead +or not I cannot say, but no symptoms of life were visible at the time I +last saw her.<a name='fna_4' id='fna_4' href='#f_4'><small>[4]</small></a></p> + +<p>As the cavalry approached the dense mass of people they used their utmost +efforts to escape: but so closely were they pressed in opposite directions +by the soldiers, the special constables, the position of the hustings, and +their own immense numbers, that immediate escape was impossible. The rapid +course of the troop was of course impeded when it came in contact with the +mob, but a passage was forced in less than a minute; so rapid indeed was +it that the guard of constables close to the hustings shared the fate of +the rest. The whole of this will be intelligible at once by a reference to +the annexed sketch.</p> + +<p>On their arrival at the hustings a scene of dreadful confusion ensued. The +orators fell or were forced off the scaffold in quick succession; +fortunately for them, the stage being rather elevated, they were in great +degree beyond the reach of the many swords which gleamed around them. Hunt +fell—or threw himself—among the constables, and was driven or dragged, +as fast as possible, down the avenue which communicated<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span> with the +magistrates’ house; his associates were hurried after him in a similar +manner. By this time so much dust had arisen that no accurate account can +be given of what further took place at that particular spot.</p> + +<p>The square was now covered with the flying multitude; though still in +parts the banners and caps of liberty were surrounded by groups. The +Manchester Yeomanry had already taken possession of the hustings, when the +Cheshire Yeomanry entered on my left in excellent order, and formed in the +rear of the hustings as well as could be expected, considering the crowds +who were now pressing in all directions and filling up the space hitherto +partially occupied.</p> + +<p>The Fifteenth Dragoons appeared nearly at the same moment, and paused +rather than halted on our left, parallel to the row of houses. They then +pressed forward, crossing the avenue of constables, which opened to let +them through, and bent their course towards the Manchester Yeomanry. The +people were now in a state of utter rout and confusion, leaving the ground +strewed with hats and shoes, and hundreds were thrown down in the attempt +to escape. The cavalry were hurrying about in all directions, completing +the work of dispersion, which—to use the words given in Wheeler’s +<i>Manchester Chronicle</i>, referred to by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span> Mr. Francis Phillips—was effected +in so short a space of time as to appear as if done “by magic.”</p> + +<p>I saw nothing that gave me an idea of resistance, except in one or two +spots where they showed some disinclination to abandon the banners; these +impulses, however, were but momentary, and banner after banner fell into +the hands of the military power.<a name='fna_5' id='fna_5' href='#f_5'><small>[5]</small></a> The extent of their defence may +perhaps best be estimated by the gallant conduct, which I particularly +noticed, of a man on horseback, apparently a gentleman’s servant. Unarmed +as far as I could perceive, he separated from the cavalry, and rode +directly into a compact body of people collected round a banner; a scuffle +ensued highly interesting; the banner rose and fell repeatedly, but +ultimately fell into his hands, and he galloped off with it in triumph.</p> + +<p>During the whole of this confusion, heightened at its close by the rattle +of some artillery<a name='fna_6' id='fna_6' href='#f_6'><small>[6]</small></a> +crossing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span> the square, shrieks were heard in all +directions, and as the crowd of people dispersed the effects of the +conflict became visible. Some were seen bleeding on the ground and unable +to rise; others, less seriously injured but faint with the loss of blood, +were retiring slowly or leaning upon others for support. One special +constable, with a cut down his head, was brought to Mr. Buxton’s house. I +saw several others in the passage, congratulating themselves on their +narrow escape, and showing the marks of sabre-cuts on their hats. I saw no +firearms, but distinctly heard four or five shots, towards the close of +the business, on the opposite side of the square, beyond the hustings; but +nobody could inform me by whom they were fired. The whole of this +extraordinary scene was the work of a few minutes.</p> + +<p>The rapid succession of so many important incidents in this short space of +time, the peculiar character of each depending so much on the variation of +a few instants in the detail, sufficiently accounts for the very +contradictory statements that have been given; added to which it should +be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span> observed that no spectator on the ground could possibly form a just +and correct idea of what was passing. When below, I could not have +observed anything accurately beyond a few yards around me, and it was only +by ascending to the upper rooms of Mr. Buxton’s house that I could form a +just and correct idea of almost every point which has since afforded so +much discussion and contention.</p> + +<p>The cavalry were now collected in different parts of the area; the centre, +but a few minutes before crowded to excess, was utterly deserted; groups +of radicals were still seen assembled on the outskirts, screening +themselves behind logs of timber or mingling with the spectators on the +pavement. The constables remained in a body in front of the house waiting +for the reappearance of Hunt, who (with his colleagues) was secured in a +small parlour opening into the passage to which I had now descended. I +believe the original intention was to send him to the New Bailey in a +carriage, but it was soon after decided that he should walk. When this was +made known it was received with shouts of approbation and “bring him out, +let the rebel walk,” was heard from all quarters. At length he came forth, +and notwithstanding the blows he had received in running the gauntlet down +the avenue of constables, I thought I could perceive<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span> a smile of triumph +on his countenance. A person (Nadin, I believe) offered to take his arm, +but he drew himself back, and in a sort of whisper said: “No, no, that’s +rather too good a thing,” or words to that effect. He then left the house, +and I soon afterwards also went away.</p> + +<p> </p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/facing21.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<i>From a Print at the Reference Library</i><span class="spacer"> </span><i>Photo by R. H. Fletcher</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Joseph Nadin</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">Deputy-Constable of Manchester<br /> +at the Time of Peterloo</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 20em;"><i>To face page 21</i></span></div> +<p> </p> + +<p>I saw no symptoms of riot or disturbances before the meeting; the +impression on my mind was that the people were sullenly peaceful, and I +had an excellent opportunity of forming an opinion by suddenly coming in +contact with a large body from Ashton, who met me in Mosley Street, as I +entered the town.<a name='fna_7' id='fna_7' href='#f_7'><small>[7]</small></a> They were walking at a moderate pace, six or seven +abreast, arm in arm, which enabled them to keep some sort of regularity in +their march. I was soon surrounded by them as I passed, and though my +horse showed a good deal of alarm, particularly at their band and flags, +they broke rank and offered no molestation whatever.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span>As soon, however, as I had quitted Mr. Buxton’s house at the conclusion of +the business, I found them in a very different state of feeling. I heard +repeated vows of revenge. “You took us unprepared, we were unarmed to-day, +and it is your day; but when we meet again the day shall be ours.” How far +this declaration of being unarmed men may be relied upon, I cannot pretend +to say; I certainly saw nothing like arms either at or before the meeting; +their sticks were, as far as came under my observation, common +walking-sticks; that some, however, were armed I can have no doubt, as a +constable, when I was leaving Mr. Buxton’s house, showed me a couple of +short skewers or daggers fixed in wooden handles, which he had taken in +the fray.</p> + +<p>I have heard from the most respectable authority that the cavalry were +assailed by stones during the short time they halted previous to their +charge. I do not wish to contradict positive assertions. What a person +<i>sees</i> must be true. My evidence on that point can only be negative. I +certainly saw nothing of the sort, and yet my eyes were fixed most +steadily upon them, and I think that I must have seen any stone larger +than a pebble at the short distance at which I stood (from thirty to fifty +yards) and the commanding view I had. I indeed saw no missile weapons used +throughout<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span> the whole transaction, but as I have before stated, the dust +at the hustings soon partially obscured everything that took place near +that particular spot; but no doubt the people defended themselves to the +best of their power, as it was absolutely impossible for them to get away +and give the cavalry a clear passage till the outer part of the mob had +fallen back. No blame can be fairly attributed to the soldiers for +wounding the constables as well as the radicals, since the chief +distinguishing mark (the former being covered and the latter uncovered) +soon ceased to exist; every man for obvious reasons covering himself in +haste the moment the dispersion commenced.</p> + +<p>Such are the leading features of this event, to which I can speak +positively; comments and opinions I have avoided as much as possible, my +object being to give a clear and impartial account of facts, which whether +for or against the adopted conclusions of either party must speak for +themselves.</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span></p> +<h2>The Evidence of The Rev. Edward Stanley</h2> + +<p>in the Trial of an action for assault, brought by Thomas Redford against +Hugh Hornby Birley and others, members of the Manchester Yeomanry, before +Mr. Justice Holroyd and a Special Jury, at Lancaster on the 4th, 5th, 6th, +7th, 8th, and 9th of April, 1822.</p> + + +<p class="center"><br /><i>Second day of the Trial.</i></p> + +<p class="center">The Rev. <span class="smcap">Edward Stanley</span> examined by<br /> +Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Blackburne</span> (<i>Counsel for the Plaintiff</i>).</p> + +<p>You, I believe, are the Rector of Alderley, in Cheshire?—I am.</p> + +<p>Brother to Sir Thomas Stanley?—Brother to Sir John Stanley.</p> + +<p>On the 16th of August, 1819, had you any business with Mr. Buxton?—I had.</p> + +<p>How far do you live from Manchester?—Between fifteen and sixteen miles.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a></span>You came into Manchester on the morning; about what time?—As near twelve +o’clock as possible I entered Mosley Street.</p> + +<p>In your passage up Mosley Street, did you meet with any number of +people?—I did.</p> + +<p>Walking?—Walking.</p> + +<p>In what manner?—They were coming down the street, walking in a +procession, six, or seven, or eight abreast, and arm in arm.</p> + +<p>Were you on horseback?—I was.</p> + +<p>Was there any interruption to your passage?—No. Should I explain?</p> + +<p>Tell us the reason?—As I was going down the street, some persons on the +pavement desired me—</p> + +<p>I do not wish to know what the persons on the pavement desired you to do; +I do not wish you to tell us the conversation, but simply to relate what +happened?—I passed through them.</p> + +<p>By their opening to give you way?—Certainly.</p> + +<p>Did you go on that day to Mr. Buxton’s house, and what time did you get +there? I got to Mr. Buxton’s house, I should think, a quarter after one.</p> + +<p>Did you go into a room there where the magistrates were assembled?—I did.</p> + +<p>How long did you remain there?—I should think about from eight to ten minutes.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span>During the time you were in the room, did Mr. Hunt arrive on the +ground?—He was called Mr. Hunt; he was in a barouche.</p> + +<p>And a multitude accompanying him?—A vast multitude.</p> + +<p>I believe there was a cheer given by the populace at the time when he did +arrive?—A tremendous shout.</p> + +<p>Did you remain in the room or did you go elsewhere?—I did not remain +there; I went into the room above it.</p> + +<p>Were there any other persons in the room besides you?—Several.</p> + +<p>Did you see the Manchester Yeomanry come on to the ground?—I did.</p> + +<p>And form in front of Mr. Buxton’s house?—They formed with their left +flank a little to the right of the special constables, and a few yards to +the right of Mr. Buxton’s house.</p> + +<p>You say to the left of the line of special constables?—Their left flank +was on the right of Mr. Buxton’s house.</p> + +<p>You saw the line of constables; where did it extend to?—It extended from +the door of Mr. Buxton’s house, apparently up to the hustings.</p> + +<p>Was there more than one line of constables?—There were two lines of +constables.</p> + +<p>What was the interval between them?—Near Mr. Buxton’s house and the mob, +three or four feet.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span>Afterwards, the line was closed by the pressure of the mob, expanding +again when they came near the hustings?—According to my observation; to +the best of my judgment; such is the impression on my mind.</p> + +<p> </p> +<div class="bbox" style="width: 299px; height: 500px;"><img src="images/facing27.jpg" alt="" /></div> +<p class="center"><span class="smcap">“Orator” Hunt</span>, 1773-1835<br /> +<span class="smcap">Chairman of the Peterloo Meeting</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 12em;"><i>To face page 27</i></span></p> +<p> </p> + +<p>Of course you saw the people collected?—Certainly.</p> + +<p>In a large mass?—In a very large mass.</p> + +<p>What was it enabled you to distinguish the special constables from the +rest?—They were superior-dressed people, had their hats on, and their +staffs were constantly appearing, and they were nearer the hustings.</p> + +<p>And the people round the hustings had their hats off?—My general +impression is, all, to speak accurately.</p> + +<p>The people on this side of the area of St. Peter’s field were not so +numerous?—There were more stragglers, and no crowd.</p> + +<p>You saw colours and caps of liberty on the ground?—I did.</p> + +<p>What number of either the one or the other? Perhaps you do not distinctly +recollect?—I cannot say.</p> + +<p>You heard Mr. Hunt speak?—No, I could just hear his voice, but I was not +able to distinguish what he said.</p> + +<p>How long had that taken place before you saw the cavalry advance towards +the hustings?—From their halt, I should think three minutes.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span>From the time you heard Mr. Hunt?—Not from the time I heard Mr. Hunt; he +was speaking before I arrived.</p> + +<p>Then from the time of the halt?—Two or three minutes.</p> + +<p>When you saw them advance towards the hustings, with what speed did they +go?—They were formed in an irregular mass. Those on the left advanced in +some sort of order. They went on at first, for a few paces, at no very +quick pace; but they soon increased their speed, till it became a sort of +rush or race amongst them all towards the hustings.</p> + +<p>Did you observe the effect that this had upon the people, whether it +caused them to disperse or not?—They could not disperse instantly.</p> + +<p>But on the outside of them?—On the right, in front of the hustings, they +immediately began to melt away, as it were, as far as they could at the +extreme.</p> + +<p>The outward edge of the meeting?—The outward edge, in front of the +hustings.</p> + +<p>Did you observe the cavalry when they got first among the thick part of +the meeting?—Their speed was diminished as soon as they came in contact +with the dense mob.</p> + +<p>Well?—But they worked their way to the hustings still, as fast, under +existing circumstances, as they could.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span>From the place in which you were, I believe you had a very commanding view +of the hustings?—I looked down upon it like a map.</p> + +<p>I understood you, you had also been in a room below that, and looked +through there?—I had.</p> + +<p>Which, in your opinion, was the better place for a correct observation of +what passed after the meeting?—Decidedly, the highest room.</p> + +<p>Did you watch the advance of the cavalry from their place up to the +hustings?—I did.</p> + +<p>Did you see either sticks, or stones, or anything of the kind used against +the cavalry in their advance up to the hustings?—Certainly not.</p> + +<p>Did you see any resistance whatever to the cavalry, except the thickness +of the meeting?—None.</p> + +<p>Do I understand you to say you saw them surround the hustings, or +not?—Surround I could not say, for the other side of the hustings, of +course, was partially eclipsed by the people upon it.</p> + +<p>But you saw them encircle part?—Encircle part.</p> + +<p>Did you see what was done when they got there?—Yes.</p> + +<p>Will you tell us what it was that you saw done?—I saw the swords up and +down, the orators tumbled or thrown over, and the mob dispersed.</p> + +<p>In your judgment, what length of time elapsed between the cavalry first +setting off into the meeting and the time of their complete +dispersion?—Starting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span> from their halt to the complete dispersion of the +meeting, I should think from three to five minutes; but I cannot speak to +a minute.</p> + +<p>In your judgment it took from three to five minutes? You did not observe +it by a watch?—No.</p> + +<p>Did you see any other troops come into the field?—I did.</p> + +<p>What were they?—</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: He says he saw what?—</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Blackburne</span>: Other troops come into the field.</p> + +<p>When was it that you saw them come into the field?—When the mob around +the hustings were dispersing rapidly, and I think Mr. Hunt was taken off.</p> + +<p>What were those troops that you saw come into the ground then?—First came +in, on the left of Mr. Buxton’s row of houses, the Cheshire Yeomanry, who +filed to the left.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: You mean to the left, looking from the house, +then?—From the house.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Blackburne</span>: Where did the Cheshire Yeomanry take up their +position when they came on the ground?—They took up their position in the +rear of the hustings, rather in advance, I think, of some mounds of earth.</p> + +<p>Do you know Windmill Street?—I know no street.</p> + +<p>You don’t know its name?—I know no name.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span>You say near a rising ground?—There is a sort of little elevated bank or +ground.</p> + +<p>Had the multitude from that part been dispersed?—The multitude in the +rear were pretty much as they had been at first. I think they were +dispersing, but not so rapidly.</p> + +<p>Do you mean in the rear of the cavalry?—In the rear of the hustings.</p> + +<p>The Cheshire Yeomanry’s position was in the rear of the hustings?—Part +near amongst these people.</p> + +<p>What other troops beside the Cheshire Yeomanry did you see come on to the +ground?—Soon after the Cheshire Yeomanry had come in and taken their +position, a troop of Dragoons, I think the 15th, came in under the windows +of Mr. Buxton’s house.</p> + +<p>You say you think they were the 15th Hussars?—They were called the 15th +Dragoons; they had Waterloo medals.</p> + +<p>Where did they take up their position?—</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: “Near Mr. Buxton’s house,” he said.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Blackburne</span>: Did they continue there?—They halted or paused +for a moment or so, a little to the left of Mr. Buxton’s house, a very +little to the left, almost in front, inclining to the left.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span>What others did you see come on the ground, besides them and the Cheshire +Yeomanry?—At the close of the business I saw some artillery driving +through the place.</p> + +<p>Was there any other besides those that you saw take up any position on the +ground?—None, on the ground.</p> + +<p>At this time, was the whole of the multitude dispersed?—It was dispersing +most rapidly; I may say dispersed, except in partial spots.</p> + +<p>After leaving the hustings, to which part of the field did the Manchester +Yeomanry go?—To all parts. I think more behind the hustings, and on the +right; they did not come back to me so much.</p> + +<p>Do you know the Quakers’ meeting-house?—I have heard where it is since; +then I did not know.</p> + +<p>Was it that way that they went?—If you could point out, in a plan, the +Quakers’ meeting-house, I could tell you if they went that road.</p> + +<p>There is the Quakers’ meeting-house, you will see written on the +plan?—Some went that way.</p> + +<p>Some of the people, too, dispersed in that direction, did they?—The +people dispersed in every direction.</p> + +<p>I am not sure whether I asked you before, whether from your situation in +this window, if any stones, or brickbats, or sticks, had been raised<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span> +against the cavalry, on their way to the hustings, you must have seen +it?—I think I must have seen it.</p> + + +<p class="center"><br />Cross-examined by Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Hullock</span>:</p> + +<p>Will you venture to swear, Mr. Stanley, that no stones nor brickbats would +be thrown during the advance of the cavalry towards the hustings, without +your perceiving it?—I can only venture to say that I saw none.</p> + +<p>I believe you have favoured the public with an account of this +transaction?—No, I have not.</p> + +<p>You printed or wrote something?—It was in circulation among my friends. I +wrote something which was never published.</p> + +<p>There was a document, written by you, circulated among your +friends?—Among my friends.</p> + +<p>Before that time, had you seen yourself and read any publication, either +in manuscript or print, on this subject?—I had read the reports in some +papers, naturally, after that time, and I might have seen a pamphlet +printed at Manchester.</p> + +<p>Then you had seen several accounts which had been given to the world +before you wrote?—Yes, I saw the reports of the papers immediately after +the meeting.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span>Whose account did you see, besides the reports in the paper?—A Mr. +Phillips’s.</p> + +<p>You, it seemed, entertained a different view of the transactions that had +taken place upon this day from those which had been given to the world +before that time?—I do not know; I should say a different view from some, +perhaps, and coinciding with the views of others.</p> + +<p>Coinciding with the views of some, and differing from the views of +others?—Respecting stones.</p> + +<p>No matter what. You are a magistrate, I understand?—I am not.</p> + +<p>Of neither Cheshire nor Lancashire?—No.</p> + +<p>I beg your pardon. You, however, were in the magistrates’ room, I think +you said, at Mr. Buxton’s?—I was.</p> + +<p>Of course you had an acquaintance with the gentlemen who were there +assembled, as acting magistrates of the committee for the counties of +Chester and Lancaster?—With two or three I had.</p> + +<p>Probably upon terms of intimacy with one of them?—Certainly.</p> + +<p>Was that gentleman there at that time?—He was.</p> + +<p>Did it occur to your mind at the time that the cavalry were sent for +(because you went back to a window, and saw the messenger crossing the +field, for the purpose of bringing them to the place, and were told or +heard there was a rumour in the room<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span> above, that the cavalry had been +sent for) did it occur (attend to my question) to you, at the time, from +the observations which you had made on the subject, that that step was +improper or premature?—I don’t think it occurred to me either one way or +the other.</p> + +<p>Am I to understand from that then that you exercised no judgment upon the +subject at that time?—I certainly did exercise some judgment, some +opinion on it, at that time.</p> + +<p>Having exercised some judgment upon the subject, I ask you whether, in +your judgment, such as you exercised upon that point, the step was either +improper or premature?—I saw no necessity for it.</p> + +<p>Then you deemed it premature?—I saw no necessity for it.</p> + +<p>It struck you then as an unnecessary act?—Certainly.</p> + +<p>Then you would go down, of course, immediately and speak to your friend +upon the subject?—No.</p> + +<p>Nor ever expressed to that friend or to any other, at the time, your +opinion with respect to the impropriety of the step?—I had no other +friend to speak to.</p> + +<p>Did you speak to him?—I did not go down into the room again.</p> + +<p>Probably you might, being a gentleman of considerable acquaintance, meet +with some friend on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span> going home, and might ride home with some gentleman, +at least part of the road?—Part of the road I did.</p> + +<p>Mr Markland, I presume?—I overtook Mr. Markland.</p> + +<p>Did you express any opinion to Mr. Markland upon these +proceedings?—Probably I did; but I have not the most distant +recollection.</p> + +<p>I ask you, upon your oath, Mr. Stanley, if you did not express to him your +entire concurrence in, and approbation of, the measures adopted by the +magistrates?—I answer, upon my oath, that I do not recollect having said +any such thing.</p> + +<p>Can you tell me whether you expressed any disapprobation of the measures +which it had been deemed necessary to adopt?—I have no recollection +whatever of the conversation.</p> + +<p>Then you mean to represent to us now, that your feelings upon the subject +were so indifferent, that you cannot tell now, whether you approved or +disapproved of these steps at the time?—I have not the most distant +recollection of any conversation I had with Mr. Markland.</p> + +<p>That is not an answer to my question. I ask you whether you mean to state +that at this time, you don’t remember whether you entertained feelings of +approbation or disapprobation of those steps?—I thought it was a dreadful +occurrence; but I hoped that there were some grounds for it.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: You are +speaking of what you thought?—It was in answer to the question.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Hullock</span>: I am speaking of what you thought then. As I +understand you, you cannot recall to your recollection the impression +under which you laboured at the time you travelled home with Mr. +Markland?—I thought it a dreadful occurrence, but I hoped there were +grounds for it.</p> + +<p>Did you mention that to Mr. Markland?—I cannot recollect.</p> + +<p>It is very important that I should endeavour to extract from you, Mr. +Stanley, without meaning the slightest disrespect to you, every fact +within your knowledge on the subject; you say that after the meeting had +been dispersed, the first cavalry which appeared on the ground was the +Cheshire Yeomanry?—Not after the meeting had dispersed, but whilst in +progress to dispersion.</p> + +<p>Do you mean to state now, to the best of your recollection, that the +Cheshire Yeomanry were the first cavalry advancing on the ground after +that?—It depends on what you call the ground; the Cheshire Yeomanry were +the first, after the Manchester cavalry, that advanced at the left.</p> + +<p>Tell me, according to the best of your recollection, which of these troops +came first upon the ground?—The Cheshire Yeomanry; but you will<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span> observe +that, at this time, the disposition of the hustings occupied a good deal +of my attention, and I did not expect the others.</p> + +<p>The Cheshire Yeomanry came over broken and uneven ground?—I cannot tell.</p> + +<p>I observe that you use the word “apparently” twice, in answer to two +questions which were put to you, which were a repetition of the same +question—whether the two lines of constables surrounded the hustings or +not; I think you said they “apparently” did?—Apparently they did.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: Surround the hustings?—Apparently.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Hullock</span>: Do you mean to state, then, that in your judgment +the avenue which was formed by the two lines of constables extended from +the house to the hustings?—At that time the impression on my mind was, +and it now is, that it certainly did.</p> + +<p>But of course you won’t swear that it did?—I cannot swear; I can only +speak to the impression on my mind.</p> + +<p>In the same way that you swear to the existence of brickbats and +stones?—To the non-existence.</p> + +<p>I think you say you saw Hunt come upon the ground?—I saw the barouche.</p> + +<p>You saw the ladies and gentlemen both. Did you see any female?—I saw a +female.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span>What was her use?—I have no conception of that.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: Of what?—</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Hullock</span>: I asked whether she was for use or show.</p> + +<p>You did not know any of the parties inside?—I had not the most distant +knowledge of them.</p> + +<p>You had heard of Carlile?—I heard of him in London.</p> + +<p>You have heard since he was in Manchester that day?—I have heard it +to-day, in the course of another examination. I never heard it before.</p> + +<p>Hunt, when he saw the cavalry coming, I think, intimated his +knowledge—his cognisance of the fact—by desiring them to give three +cheers?—I could not hear.</p> + +<p>There was some cheering given?—There was a very loud cheer.</p> + +<p>From the hustings?—From all the mob.</p> + +<p>You say when he was addressing the mob, you did not hear his words, “but I +think, whatever his words were, they excited a shout from those +immediately about him, which was re-echoed with fearful animation by the +rest of the multitude”?—Certainly, that is the impression on my mind; +those were my own words.</p> + +<p>It was tremendous—the shout?—It was not so tremendous as the shout with +which Hunt was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span> received on the ground; the first was the loudest shout.</p> + +<p>And the most appalling?—The first, when Hunt was received on the ground; +I never heard so loud a shout.</p> + +<p>“Terrific,” was your word?—I should say terrific.</p> + +<p>You say that the people who were immediately contiguous to the hustings +heard what Hunt said?—I cannot say.</p> + +<p>You inferred that from their shouting?—Certainly.</p> + +<p>Then that shout was re-echoed by the mob at a distance?—I conceived so.</p> + +<p>What proportion, do you think, of the mass of the people, with their eyes +up, and mouths open, looking at that man during the time, could hear one +word he said?—I should think no one beyond ten yards from the hustings, +in the bustle of such a day—that is guess.</p> + +<p>I daresay it is a good guess, too; how do you think they would carry the +resolutions at the outside, at the right flank, the left flank, and beyond +the ten yards, upon the propositions made by this orator?—I have no +opinion to give about that.</p> + +<p>It certainly is a difficult point. It appeared to you that Hunt, as far as +his voice could reach, had a pretty absolute control over his friends; +they shouted as he spoke; it appeared that he was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span> +commander-in-chief?—The thing never occurred to me; I cannot speak +positively.</p> + +<p>Have not you an opinion that he was head and leader of the party?—My +opinion certainly is, that he was.</p> + +<p>And now, I will ask you this question, as a clergyman, and as a man of +character, which I believe you to be—I ask you, upon your oath, whether, +in your judgment, the public tranquillity and the peace of Manchester were +not endangered by a mob of that description, composed in that manner, and +having such a man as Hunt at its head—Hunt and Carlile, for +instance?—Hunt and Carlile are dangerous people, and any mob under their +control must be dangerous.</p> + +<p>Re-examined by Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Blackburne</span>:</p> + +<p>Do you know, Mr. Stanley, whether this meeting was under the command of +either Hunt or Carlile?—No.</p> + +<p>When you say there was a shout given on the Manchester Yeomanry coming +into the field, was there any other shout besides that given by the +multitude?—There was.</p> + +<p>Whose shout was that?—The Manchester Yeomanry, the special constables, +and the people round the pavement in front of our house.</p> + +<p>May I ask you whether you were terrified by those shouts?—Personally, +certainly not.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: Explain what you +mean by that?—I myself was not alarmed about them.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Blackburne</span>: And whether it did not create terror and +alarm?—Not to me individually, certainly not.</p> + +<p>You have said that you presented a description of what you saw at the +meeting, to some of your friends?—I did.</p> + +<p>How soon was that written after the meeting?—I can scarcely say; I should +think perhaps two months, but I cannot speak accurately. It was when the +impression was clear on my mind.</p> + +<p>Clear and fresh in your recollection. Will you have the goodness to tell +me whether you heard or saw any person read the Riot Act?—I neither heard +it read nor saw it read.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Hullock</span>: If it was read you did not hear it?—I did not hear +it.</p> + +<p>If it should turn out to have been read, and read loudly, there might have +been something else done—but that is conclusion—that is reason.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Evans</span>: Your Lordship has on your note that McKennell said that he did +not<a name='fna_8' id='fna_8' href='#f_8'><small>[8]</small></a> hear the Riot Act read.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Cross</span>: He said so.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Justice Holroyd</span>: Yes, I have.</p> + +<p>Mr. <span class="smcap">Serjeant Blackburne</span>: Then that is my case, my Lord.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span> </p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/page44_tmb.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<a href="images/page44.jpg"><small>Larger Image</small></a><br /> +<span class="large">Plan of Peterloo.</span> (<i>F. A. B.</i>)<br /> +<i>By permission of Mr. H. Guppy.</i><br /> +<br /> +Compiled from a number of Contemporary Plans, and showing (in dotted outline)<br /> +the position of modern blocks of buildings.</div> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</a></span></p> +<h2>Sir William Jolliffe</h2> +<p class="center"><i>afterwards</i></p> +<p class="center"><span class="large">LORD HYLTON</span></p> + +<p> </p> +<p class="dropcap"><span class="caps">William George Hylton Jolliffe</span> (1800-1876), the first Baron Hylton, was +the son of the Rev. W. J. Jolliffe. At the date of Peterloo he was not +quite nineteen years of age, and was serving as a Lieutenant in the 15th +Hussars, then quartered at the Cavalry Barracks at Manchester. He retired +from the Hussars with the rank of Captain. He was created a Baronet in +1821, and sat as member for Petersfield for about thirty years, acting for +a short time as Under Secretary for Home Affairs, and afterwards as +Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. He was exceedingly popular as a +Conservative Whip, and when he was raised to the Peerage in 1866, he took +the title of Baron Hylton from the family’s connection with the Hyltons of +Hylton Castle.</p> + +<p>The letter which follows appeared in Dean Pellew’s <i>Life of Lord +Sidmouth</i>, published in 1847.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span> It will be seen that it is addressed to T. +G. B. Estcourt, Esq.; presumably he obtained the information for Dean +Pellew. The letter is approved and annotated by “E. Smyth, Esq., of +Norwich, who commanded a troop of the Cheshire Yeomanry at Peterloo.” +Unfortunately, the Notes to the letter are somewhat confusing: some are +signed by Captain Smyth, others are not signed, and it is not easy to +determine their authorship. Moreover, Captain Smyth’s contributions are +not on a level with the letter itself. It has therefore been thought +better to omit the Notes altogether, and allow Lieut. Jolliffe’s very +clear and well-balanced report to speak for itself. A few explanatory +words have been inserted in square brackets.</p> + +<p>The Rev. Edward Stanley, in his Evidence, given above, mentioned the fact +that the Hussars who rode at Peterloo were wearing their Waterloo medals. +As a matter of fact, the 15th (the King’s) Hussars, whose motto is +“Merebimur,” have not only “Waterloo,” but also the Peninsula, Vittoria, +Afghanistan and a number of other names inscribed on their colours. The +uniform is blue, with a Busby bag and scarlet plume. Presumably the plume +shown in our photograph came from the helmet of one of the Hussars. It +seems clear from the evidence which was given before the Relief Committee, +after Peterloo, that there was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span> not the same feeling of resentment against +the Hussars as against the local Yeomanry; in fact, it was more than once +asserted that troopers of the Hussars actually restrained the Manchester +Yeomanry from excessive violence.</p> + +<hr style="width: 25%;" /> + +<p>I wrote to the present Lord Hylton to ask if he could lend a portrait of +his Grandfather for reproduction here. He replied that he could not do so, +but added: “As a matter of fact, a full-length portrait (by Sir Francis +Grant, P.R.A., in my possession) has been engraved, and a copy of this +engraving is, I should think, not difficult to procure.” I have not been +able to find it. It is not included in the British Museum Series.</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span></p> +<h2>The Charge of the 15th Hussars<br />at Peterloo</h2> +<p class="center"><i>as described by</i></p> + +<p class="note"><span class="smcap">Sir WILLIAM G. H. JOLLIFFE, Bart.</span>, M.P. (who rode in the charge as a +Lieutenant of Hussars) in a letter which appears in Dean Pellew’s <i>Life of +Lord Sidmouth</i>, Vol. III., p. 253 <i>et seq.</i></p> + +<p> </p> +<p class="right"><span style="padding-right: 4em;">9, <span class="smcap">St. James’s Place</span>,</span><br /> +<span style="padding-right: 2em;"><i>April 11th, 1845</i>.</span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">My Dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>Twenty-five years have passed since the collision unfortunately occurred +between the population of Manchester and its neighbourhood and the +military stationed in that town, on the sixteenth of August, 1819.</p> + +<p>I was at that time a Lieutenant in the 15th King’s Hussars, which Regiment +had been quartered in Manchester Cavalry Barracks about six weeks. This +was my first acquaintance with a large manufacturing population. I had +little knowledge of the condition of that population, <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span>whether or no a +great degree of distress was then prevalent, or whether or no the distrust +and bad feeling which appeared to exist between employers and employed, +was wholly or in part caused by the agitation of political questions. I +will not, therefore, enter into any speculation on these points, but I +will endeavour to relate the facts which fell under my own observations, +although acting, as of course I was, under the command of others, and in a +subordinate situation. The military force stationed in Manchester +consisted of six troops of the 15th Hussars, under the command of Colonel +Dalrymple; one troop of Horse Artillery with two guns, under Major +Dyneley; and nearly the whole of the 31st Regiment, under Colonel Guy +L’Estrange (who commanded the whole as senior officer). [Sir John Byng was +then at Pontefract.] Some companies of the 88th Regiment and [six troops +of] the Cheshire Yeomanry had also been brought into the town in +anticipation of disturbances which might result from the expected meeting; +and these latter had only arrived on the morning of the sixteenth, or a +few hours previously; and, lastly, there was a troop of Manchester +Yeomanry Cavalry, consisting of about forty members, who, from the manner +in which they were made use of (to say the least) greatly aggravated the +disasters of the day. Their ranks<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span> were filled chiefly by wealthy master +manufacturers; and without the knowledge possessed by a (strictly +speaking) military body, they were placed, most unwisely, as it appeared, +under the immediate command and order of the civil authorities.</p> + +<p>Our Regiment paraded in field-service order at about 8.30 or it might be 9 +o’clock, a.m. Two squadrons of it were marched into the town about ten +o’clock. They were formed up and dismounted in a wide street, the name of +which I forget,<a name='fna_9' id='fna_9' href='#f_9'><small>[9]</small></a> to the North of St. Peter’s field (the place appointed +for the meeting), and at the distance of nearly a quarter of a mile from +it.</p> + +<p>The Cheshire Yeomanry were formed, on our left, in the same street. One +troop of our Regiment was attached to the artillery, which took up a +position between the Cavalry Barracks and the town; and one troop remained +in charge of the Barracks.</p> + +<p>The two squadrons with which I was stationed must have remained dismounted +nearly two hours. During the greater portion of that period a solid mass +of people continued moving along a street about a hundred yards to our +front on the way to the place of meeting. Other officers as well as myself +occasionally rode to the front (to the end <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span>of a street) to see them pass. +They marched at a brisk pace in ranks well closed up, five or six bands of +music being interspersed, and there appeared to be but few women with +them. Mr. Hunt, with two or three other men, and I think two women dressed +in light blue and white, were in an open carriage drawn by the people. +This carriage was adorned with blue and white flags; and the day was fine +and hot. As soon as the great bulk of the procession had passed, we were +ordered to stand to our horses. In a very short time afterwards, the four +troops of the 15th mounted, and at once moved off by the right, at a trot +which was increased to a canter. Someone who had been sent from the place +of meeting to bring us led the way through a number of narrow streets and +by a circuitous route to (what I will call) the South-west<a name='fna_10' id='fna_10' href='#f_10'><small>[10]</small></a> corner of +St. Peter’s field. We advanced along the South<a name='fna_11' id='fna_11' href='#f_11'><small>[11]</small></a> side of this space of +ground without a halt or pause even: the words “Front!” and “Forward!” +were given, and the trumpet sounded the charge at the very moment the +threes wheeled up. When fronted, our line extended quite across the +ground, which in all <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span>parts was so filled with people that their hats +seemed to touch.</p> + +<p>It was then for the first time that I saw the Manchester troop of +Yeomanry; they were scattered singly or in small groups over the greater +part of the field, literally hemmed up and hedged into the mob so that +they were powerless either to make an impression or to escape; in fact, +they were in the power of those whom they were designed to overawe, and it +required only a glance to discover their helpless position, and the +necessity of our being brought to their rescue. As I was at the time +informed, this hopeless state of things happened thus: A platform had been +erected near the centre of the field, from which Mr. Hunt and others were +to address the multitude, and the magistrates, having ordered a strong +body of constables to arrest the speakers, unfortunately imagined that +they should support the peace officers by bringing up the troop of +Yeomanry at a walk. The result of this movement, instead of that which the +magistrates desired, was unexpectedly to place this small body of horsemen +(so introduced into a dense mob) entirely at the mercy of the people by +whom they were, on all sides, pressed upon and surrounded.</p> + +<p>The charge of the Hussars, to which I have just alluded, swept this +mingled mass of human <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span>beings before it; people, yeomen, and constables, +in their confused attempts to escape, ran one over the other; so that by +the time we had arrived at the end of the field the fugitives were +literally piled up to a considerable elevation above the level of the +ground. (I may here, by the way, state that this field, as it is called, +was merely an open space of ground, surrounded by buildings, and itself, I +rather think, in course of being built upon.).</p> + +<p>The Hussars drove the people forward with the flats of their swords, but +sometimes, as is almost inevitably the case when men are placed in such +situations, the edge was used, both by the Hussars, and, as I have heard, +by the yeomen also; but of this last part I was not cognizant, and +believing though I do that nine out of ten of the sabre-wounds were caused +by the Hussars, I must still consider that it redounds to the humane +forbearance of the men of the 15th that more wounds were not received, +when the vast numbers are taken into consideration with whom they were +brought into hostile collision; beyond all doubt, however, the far greater +amount of injuries were from the pressure of the routed multitude. The +Hussars on the left pursued down the various streets which led from the +place; those on the right met with something more of resistance.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span>The mob had taken possession of various buildings on that side, +particularly of a Quakers’ chapel and burial ground enclosed with a wall. +This they occupied for some little time, and in attempting to displace +them, some of the men and horses were struck with stones and brickbats. I +was on the left, and as soon as I had passed completely over the ground +and found myself in the street on the other side, I turned back, and then, +seeing a sort of fight still going on on the right, I went in that +direction. At the very moment I reached the Quakers’ meeting-house, I saw +a farrier of the 15th ride at a small door in the outer wall, and to my +surprise his horse struck it with such force that it flew open. Two or +three Hussars then rode in, and the place was immediately in their +possession. I then turned towards the elevated platform, which still +remained in the centre of the field with persons upon it; a few straggling +Hussars and yeomen, together with a number of men having the appearance of +peace-officers were congregating about it. On my way thither I met the +Commanding-officer of my Regiment, who directed me to find a Trumpeter, in +order that he might sound the “rally” or “retreat.” This sent me again +down the street I had first been in (after the pursuing men of my troop); +but I had not ridden above a hundred yards before I found a Trumpeter, and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span>returned with him to the Colonel. The field and the adjacent streets now +presented an extraordinary sight: the ground was quite covered with hats, +shoes, musical instruments, and other things. Here and there lay the +unfortunates who were too much injured to move away, and this sight was +rendered the more distressing by observing some women among the sufferers.</p> + +<p>Standing near the corner of the street where I had been sent in search of +a Trumpeter, a brother officer called my attention to a pistol being fired +from a window. I saw it fired twice, and I believe it had been fired once +before I observed it. Some of the 31st Regiment just now arriving on the +ground were ordered to take possession of this house, but I do not know if +this was carried into effect.</p> + +<p>I next went towards a private of the Regiment whose horse had fallen over +a piece of timber nearly in the middle of the square, and who was most +seriously injured. There were many of these pieces of timber (or +timber-trees) lying upon the ground, and as these could not be +distinguished when the mob covered them, they had caused bad falls to one +officer’s horse and to many of the troopers’. While I was attending to the +wounded soldier, the artillery troop with the troop of Hussars attached to +it, arrived on the ground from <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span>the same direction by which we had entered +the field; these were quickly followed by the Cheshire Yeomanry. The 31st +Regiment came in another direction, and the whole remained formed up till +our squadrons had fallen in again.</p> + +<p>Carriages were brought to convey the wounded to the Manchester Infirmary, +and the troop of Hussars who came up with the guns was marched off to +escort to the gaol a number of persons who had been arrested, and among +these Mr. Hunt. For some time the town was patrolled by the troops, the +streets being nearly empty, and the shops for the most part closed. We +then returned to the Barracks. I should not omit to mention that, before +the men were dismissed, the arms were minutely examined; and that no +carbine or pistol was found to have been fired, and only one pistol to +have been loaded.</p> + +<p>About 8 p.m. one squadron of the 15th Hussars (two troops) was ordered on +duty to form part of a strong night picket, the other part of which +consisted of two companies of the 88th Regiment. This picket was stationed +at a place called the New Cross, at the end of Oldham Street. As soon as +it had taken up its position, a mob assembled about it, which increased as +the darkness came on; stones were thrown at the soldiers, and the Hussars +many times cleared the ground by <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span>driving the mob up the streets leading +from the New Cross. But these attempts to get rid of the annoyance were +only successful for the moment, for the people got through the houses or +narrow passages from one street into another, and the troops were again +attacked, and many men and horses struck with stones. This lasted nearly +an hour and a half, and the soldiers being more and more pressed upon, a +town magistrate, who was with the picket, read the Riot Act, and the +officer in command ordered the 88th to fire (which they did by platoon +firing) down three of the streets. The firing lasted only a few minutes; +perhaps not more than thirty shots were fired; but these had a magical +effect; the mob ran away and dispersed forthwith, leaving three or four +persons on the ground with gunshot wounds. At 4 a.m. the picket squadron +was relieved by another squadron of the Regiment. With this latter +squadron I was on duty, and after we had patrolled the town for two hours, +the officer in command sent me to the magistrates (who had remained +assembled during the night) to report to them that the town was perfectly +quiet, and to request their sanction to the return of the military to +their quarters.</p> + +<p>On the afternoon of the 17th I visited, in company with some military +medical officers, the Infirmary. I saw there from twelve to twenty cases +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span>of sabre-wounds, and among these two women who appeared not likely to +recover. One man was in a dying state from a gunshot wound in the head; +another had had his leg amputated; both these casualties arose from the +firing of the 88th the night before. Two or three were reputed dead; one +of them a constable, killed on St. Peter’s field, but I saw none of the +bodies.</p> + +<p>As shortly as I could I have now related what fell under my own +observation during these twenty-four hours ... I trust that I have, in +some degree, complied with your wishes.</p> + +<p><span style="margin-left: 8em;"><span class="smcap">William G. Hylton Jolliffe.</span></span></p> + +<p><i>To</i> Thomas Grimston Bucknall Estcourt, Esq., M.P.</p> + + + +<p> </p><p><a name="facing_59" id="facing_59"></a> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/facing59.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<i>By permission of Lady Durning Lawrence</i><span class="spacer"> </span><i>Photo by Briggs</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">John Benjamin Smith</span><br /> +1794-1879<br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 18em;"><i>To face page 59</i></span></div> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span></p> +<h2>John Benjamin Smith</h2> +<p class="center"><i>First Chairman of the Anti-Corn Law League</i>.</p> + +<p> </p> +<p class="dropcap"><span class="caps">John Benjamin Smith</span> (1794-1879), whose account of Peterloo follows, was +better known as a strenuous advocate of Free Trade; even in this capacity, +however, a breakdown of health some years before the Repeal of the Corn +Laws, robbed him of much of the credit which was due to him for the +important spade-work that he had done. He was the first Treasurer of the +Anti-Corn Law Association, and when that developed into the Anti-Corn Law +League, he became its first Chairman. He contested several elections on +Free Trade principles, and used himself to tell how he had converted +Cobden to “total repeal.” He sat as member, first for the Stirling Burghs, +and afterwards, during more than twenty years, for Stockport. His +correspondence with John Bright has recently been placed in the Manchester +Reference Library. During the American War he strongly espoused the cause +of the North, and he was one of those who urged the Government to +encourage the growth of cotton in India.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span>Mr. Smith was a Trustee of Owens College under the Founder’s will; and he +subscribed liberally towards its extension. His name is perpetuated in the +“Smith” Professorship of English Literature, which was endowed in memory +of him by his two daughters and his son-in-law. A short memoir of him, +which appeared in Alderman Thompson’s <i>History of Owens College</i>, has been +reprinted and published separately. (Manchester, J. E. Cornish, 1887.)</p> + +<p>At the date of Peterloo he was only twenty-five years of age, but he had +already shown great promise as a business man. Entering the office of his +uncle, a Manchester merchant, at the early age of fourteen, he was made +responsible for the whole correspondence of the firm five years later; and +before he was twenty he had negotiated some very profitable purchases of +cotton at the sales of the East India Company.</p> + +<p>The account of Peterloo which follows is an extract from his +“Reminiscences,” which were written towards the close of his life at the +earnest request of his family. The manuscript of these is now at the +Manchester Reference Library, as is also a typed and bound copy presented +by his daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. Among his other manuscripts (also +at the Manchester Reference Library) is a shorter account of Peterloo,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span> +apparently written immediately after the event. The statement made +recently that Mr. J. B. Smith was the author of the well-known <i>Impartial +Narrative of the Melancholy Occurrences at Manchester</i> seems to be due to +an error: apparently the <i>Impartial Narrative</i> (which seems to have been +written by another hand) has been confused with Mr. Smith’s shorter and +earlier account.</p> + +<p>We have already pointed out that Mr. Smith’s narrative, which is not so +detailed as those of Stanley and Jolliffe in its description of the charge +of the troops, is specially valuable for the account it gives of the +circumstances immediately preceding and following the catastrophe, and its +estimate of the character of the crowd. In these details it is strikingly +corroborative of Bamford’s story, as told in his <i>Passages in the Life of +a Radical</i>, and of the information given by Mr. John Edward Taylor, +who—under the pseudonym of “An Observer”—edited the contemporary tracts +entitled <i>The Peterloo Massacre</i>.</p> + +<hr style="width: 25%;" /> + +<p>The portrait of Mr. Smith which appears here is from a photograph kindly +lent by his daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence.</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="large"><i>AN EXTRACT FROM THE</i></span></p> + +<h2>“Reminiscences” of John Benjamin Smith</h2> + +<p class="note"><i>Copied from the original manuscript then in the possession of his +daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. (August 1913.)</i></p> + +<p> </p> +<p>... The people, disappointed in their expectations that prosperity and +plenty would follow the return of peace, and having no faith in a +legislature which as soon as the war terminated inflicted upon them a Corn +Law to deprive them of cheap corn, demanded a better representation in +Parliament. Stimulated by the writings of Cobbett, associations were +formed in all the manufacturing districts to obtain a reform in +Parliament. Lancashire took the lead in this movement. Clubs were +established in 1816 in all the manufacturing towns and villages. At the +small town of Middleton, near Manchester, a Club was formed in which +Bamford, the weaver-poet, took a leading part. They were joined by many +honest and intelligent men from all parts of the district, among whom<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span> was +John Knight, a small manufacturer. A meeting of delegates was held on the +first of January, 1817, at which it was decided that the reforms required +could only be accomplished by the establishment of annual parliaments and +universal suffrage.</p> + +<p>The establishment of these clubs alarmed the Government, who saw in them +nothing but an intention to overturn the institutions of the country, and +to revive in this country the enormities of the French Revolution. Spies +and Informers were employed by the Government, and John Knight and +thirty-seven others who had legally assembled to discuss the reforms which +they deemed necessary to obtain a repeal of the Corn Laws and good +government, were arrested on the information of spies, and sent for trial +to Lancaster, but on their trial before Mr. Baron Wood, were all found not +guilty by the Jury.</p> + +<p>The Sidmouth Government suspended the Habeas Corpus Act so that they could +arrest and imprison any person as long as they pleased. The Tories, +following the example of the Radicals, established Associations for the +protection of the Constitution.</p> + +<p>In January, 1818, however, it was announced that the Act for the +suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act would be repealed. No sooner were the +people<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span> relieved from the danger of being sent to prison for being present +at a meeting to petition Parliament for reform, as great numbers had been +in Lancashire imprisoned from March, 1817 until January, 1818, and then +discharged without being informed what charges were made against +them—than the Reform Associations were revived. A fresh campaign was +rigorously commenced early in 1819.</p> + +<p>Henry Hunt (commonly called Orator Hunt) had come forward as the champion +of the people’s rights. On the 25th of January, he made a public entry +into Manchester from Stockport, accompanied by large crowds with flags and +banners. The meeting was enthusiastic but very peaceable. Meetings were +held in all the surrounding towns and villages to appoint district +delegates to make arrangements for a great meeting to be held in +Manchester. This memorable meeting was held on the 16th of August, 1819, +on a large vacant plot of land called St. Peter’s field, adjoining St. +Peter’s Street, and in sight of St. Peter’s Church. The actors in the +bloody tragedy of that day were called “The Heroes of Peterloo,” in +contrast with the brave heroes of Waterloo.</p> + +<p>This meeting was called to petition Parliament for a Reform of Parliament +and the Repeal of the Corn Laws, and it is a curious coincidence that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span> on +the very spot where the largest public meeting was ever held to petition +Parliament for the Repeal of the Corn Laws, in the dispersion of which by +military force six hundred persons were killed and wounded there now +stands the Free Trade Hall, erected twenty years afterwards on Peterloo, +for the peaceful and noble object of obtaining bread for the people by the +repeal of the wicked laws by which it was prohibited.</p> + +<p>I had no intention of going to this meeting, but my Aunt called at the +Counting House and asked me to accompany her to Mrs. Orton’s, Mount +Street, St. Peter’s field, to see the great meeting—a house overlooking +the whole space, and next but one to where the Magistrates were assembled. +We reached there about half-past eleven o’clock, and on our way saw large +bodies of men and women with bands playing and flags and banners bearing +devices: “No Corn Laws,” “Reform,” etc. There were crowds of people in all +directions, full of good humour, laughing and shouting and making fun. I +always wore a white hat in summer, and I found that Mr. Hunt also wore a +white hat, and it became the symbol of radicalism, and may have been the +cause of the politeness shown to us by the crowd.</p> + + +<p>It seemed to be a gala day with the country people who were mostly dressed +in their best and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span> brought with them their wives, and when I saw boys and +girls taking their father’s hand in the procession, I observed to my Aunt: +“These are the guarantees of their peaceable intentions—we need have no +fears,” and so we passed on to Mrs. Orton’s. When we arrived there we saw +great crowds which were constantly increased by the arrival of successive +country processions until it was estimated that the meeting amounted to +60,000 people. There was a double row of constables formed from Mr. +Buxton’s (where the magistrates had taken their station) to the hustings.</p> + +<p>My Father joined us soon after our arrival at Mrs. Orton’s.</p> + +<p>At length Hunt made his appearance in an open barouche drawn by two +horses, and a woman dressed in white sitting on the box. On their reaching +the hustings which were prepared for the orator, he was received with +enthusiastic applause; the waving of hats and flags; the blowing of +trumpets; and the playing of music. Hunt stepped on to the hustings, and +was again cheered by the vast assemblage. He began to address them, and I +could distinctly see his motions through the glass I held in my hand, and +I could hear his voice, but could not understand what he said. He paused, +and the people cheered him.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span>About this time there was an alarm among the women and children near the +place where I stood, and I could also see a part of the crowd in motion +towards the Deansgate side, but I thought it a false alarm, as many +returned again and joined in the huzzas of the crowd. A second alarm +arose, and I heard the sound of a horn, and immediately the Manchester +Yeomanry appeared, coming from Peter Street, headed by Hugh Birley, the +same man who, in 1815, as Boroughreeve of Manchester, presided at the +public meeting assembled to petition Parliament for the Repeal of the Corn +Laws. They galloped up to the house where the Magistrates were assembled, +halted, and drew up in line. After some hesitation, from what cause I do +not know, I heard the order to form three deep, and then the order to +march. The Trumpeter led the way and galloped towards the hustings, +followed by the yeomanry.</p> + +<p>Whilst this was passing, my attention was called to another movement +coming from the opposite side of the meeting. A troop of soldiers, the +15th Hussars, turned round the corner of the house where we stood and +galloped forwards towards the crowd. They were succeeded by the Cheshire +Yeomanry, and lastly by two pieces of artillery. On the arrival of the +soldiers, the special constables, the magistrates, and the soldiers set +up<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</a></span> loud shouts. This was responded to by the crowd with waving of hats. +After this the soldiers galloped amongst the people creating frightful +alarm and disorder. The people ran helter-skelter in every direction.</p> + +<p>It was a hot, dusty day; clouds of dust arose which obscured the view. +When it had subsided a startling scene was presented. Numbers of men, +women, and children were lying on the ground who had been knocked down and +run over by the soldiers. I noticed one woman lying face downwards, +apparently lifeless. A man went up to her and lifted one of her legs; it +fell as if she were lifeless; another man lifted both her legs and let +them fall. I saw her some time after carried off by the legs and arms as +if she were dead.</p> + +<p>My attention was then directed to a number of constables bringing from the +hustings the famous Hunt wearing a white hat, and with him another man, +also wearing a white hat, who was said to be Johnson. The prisoners were +treated in a scandalous manner; many of the constables hissed and beat +them as they passed. When they reached the Magistrates’ house he was +surrounded by constables, some pulling him by the collar, others by the +coat. A dastardly attack was made upon him by General Clay, who with a +large stick struck him over the head with both hands as he was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span> +ascending the steps to the Magistrates’ house. The blow knocked in his hat +and packed it over his face. He then turned round as if ashamed of himself +and became a quiet spectator. The ground by this time was cleared, and +nothing was to be seen but soldiers and constables.</p> + +<p> </p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/facing69.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<i>Bronze Relief by John Cassidy, R.C.A.</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">The Hunt Memorial in the Vestibule of the<br />Manchester Reform Club</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 14em;"><i>To face page 69</i></span></div> +<p> </p> + +<p>The Rev. Mr. Hay (the Chairman to the Magistrates) then stood on the steps +of Mr. Buxton’s house and addressed the constables. I could not hear what +he said, but he was cheered when he concluded. He then returned into the +house, but came out again soon afterwards with Mr. Marriott, the +Magistrate, and Hunt in the custody of Nadin, Chief Constable, and with +Johnson in the custody of another constable. When Hunt made his +appearance, he was assailed with groans and hisses by the soldiers and +constables. Hunt took off his hat and bowed to them, which appeared to +calm them while they marched towards Deansgate on their way to the New +Bailey prison, escorted by the cavalry. On quitting the windows from +whence we had witnessed so many painful scenes, we descended and found two +special constables who had been brought into the house. One presented a +shocking sight—the face was all over blood from a sword-cut on his head, +and his shoulder was put out. The other was bloody from being rode over +and kicked on the back of his head.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span>When the particulars of this bloody tragedy became known, strong feelings +of indignation were expressed all over the country. The Manchester +magistrates, alarmed at the tone of public opinion in London, had a +meeting hastily convened on the 19th of August at the Police Office, which +was adjourned to the Star Inn, where resolutions were passed thanking the +magistrates and the soldiers. I happened by accident to be present at the +meeting. A young man with whom I was acquainted, a clerk in the office of +the Clerk to the Magistrates, happening to meet me in the street on his +way to the meeting, took me by the arm and said: “Come with me.” I asked +where he was going, and when I learned, declined to go. He replied: +“Nonsense, you will hear what is going on,” and so I somewhat reluctantly +went with him to the Star Inn. On our arrival we found the room pretty +full and I took a seat. The Chairman, Mr. Francis Phillips, rose and said: +“If there be any persons present who do not approve of the objects of this +meeting they are requested to withdraw.” I thought he looked at me, and +felt a little uncomfortable. He sat down again and rose to repeat his +request. I thought that as I should know better what the object of the +meeting was after I had heard it explained, I would sit still, and so I +remained to the end. After the meeting I told some of my<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span> Reform friends +how I came to be present at the meeting, and they wished me to write out +an account of the proceedings. I did so, and with a few alterations and +the omission of names it was inserted in <i>Cowdroy’s Gazette</i>. This +statement created great alarm among those who got up the meeting to thank +the magistrates, and they denounced it as a false statement, but another +letter to <i>Cowdroy’s Gazette</i> affirmed the truth of the account of the +meeting to thank the magistrates, and threatened to make public the names +of the speakers if its correctness was again called in question.</p> + +<p> </p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/facing71a.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br /><img src="images/facing71b.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">The Peterloo Medal</span><br /> +Note the women and children, and the cap of Liberty held aloft in the centre<br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 18em;"><i>To face page 71</i></span></div> +<p> </p> + +<p>The dispersion of a legally convened meeting by military force aroused a +general indignation, and the smuggled passing of thanks to the magistrates +so dishonestly sent forth occasioned an expression of public feeling and +opinion such as had never been manifested in Manchester before. A +“Declaration and Protest” against the Star Inn resolutions was immediately +issued, stating that “We are fully satisfied by personal observation on +undoubted information that the meeting was <i>perfectly peaceable</i>; that no +seditious or intemperate harangues were made there; that the Riot Act, <i>if +read at all</i>, was read <i>privately, or without the knowledge of a great +body of the meeting</i>, and we feel it our bounden duty to protest against +and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</a></span> to express our utter disapprobation of the unexpected and unnecessary +violence by which the assembly was dispersed.</p> + +<p>“We further declare that the meeting convened at the Police Office on the +19th of August for the purpose of thanking the magistrates, municipal +officers, soldiers, etc., was strictly and exclusively <i>private</i>, and in +order that the privacy might be more completely ensured was adjourned to +the Star Inn. It is a matter of notoriety that no expression of dissent +from the main object of the meeting was there permitted. We therefore deny +that it had any claim to the title of a ‘numerous and highly respectable +meeting of the inhabitants of Manchester and Salford and their +neighbourhood.’”</p> + +<p>In the course of three or four days this protest received 4,800 +signatures.</p> + +<p>By way of counteracting this energetic protest, on the 27th of August Lord +Sidmouth communicated to the Manchester Magistrates and to Major Trafford +and the military serving under him the thanks of the Prince Regent “for +their prompt, decisive, and efficient measures for preservation of the +public peace on August the 16th.”</p> + +<p>Meanwhile hundreds of persons wounded on that fatal day were enduring +dreadful suffering. They were disabled from work; not daring to apply for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span> +parish relief; not even daring to apply for surgical aid, lest, in the +arbitrary spirit of the time, their acknowledgment that they had received +their wounds on St. Peter’s field might send them to prison—perhaps to +the scaffold.</p> + +<p>A committee was formed for the purpose of making a rigid enquiry into the +cases of those who had been killed and wounded; and subscriptions were +raised for their relief. After an enquiry of many successive weeks the +committee published the cases of eleven killed and five hundred and sixty +wounded, of whom about a hundred and twenty were females.</p> + +<p>The Rev. W. R. Hay, Chairman of the Bench of Magistrates, was rewarded by +being presented to the living of Rochdale, worth £2,000 a year.</p> + +<p>Hunt and his companions were committed to Lancaster, and subsequently +tried at York, where he was found guilty and sentenced to be imprisoned +for two years and a half, and Johnson, Healey, and Bamford to one year’s +imprisonment.</p> + +<p>The bloody proceedings at Peterloo startled the whole nation. Meetings +were held everywhere, denouncing them in the strongest terms. Sir Francis +Burdett addressed a letter to the Electors of Westminster, expressing his +“Shame, grief, and indignation” at the proceedings, and was prosecuted by +the Attorney-General for Libel and was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span> fined £2,000 and imprisoned for +three months. Lord Fitzwilliam, for attending a public meeting to express +disapprobation at the means by which the meeting at Peterloo was +dispersed, was dismissed from his office as Lord Lieutenant of Yorkshire.</p> + +<p>These proceedings produced a deep impression on the minds of thoughtful +men, who began to think we were on the brink of despotism, and that the +time had arrived when the country should be no longer ruled by Landowners +and Boroughmongers, but by representatives chosen by the people....</p> + + +<p> </p><p><a name="facing_75" id="facing_75"></a> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/facing75.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<i>Photo by R. H. Fletcher</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Banner Carried at Peterloo</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 18em;"><i>To face page 75</i></span></div> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span></p> +<h2>APPENDIX A.</h2> +<p class="center"><span class="large">Some Relics of Peterloo</span></p> + +<p class="center"><br />1.—A BANNER CARRIED AT PETERLOO.</p> + +<p>At the entrance to the Reading-room of the Reform Club at Middleton (on +the left as you reach the door) may be seen one of the Banners carried at +Peterloo by the Middleton contingent, which was led by Samuel Bamford. It +is of green material (or so it seemed to me) and the letters are stamped +on it in gold capitals. The motto facing the entrance is LIBERTY AND +FRATERNITY. On the other side of the Banner (seen from within the room) +are the words: UNITY AND STRENGTH. The explanatory inscription reads: +“This Banner was carried by the Middleton Reformers, with Samuel Bamford +at their head, to Peterloo, and is frequently mentioned in the historical +records of that movement.” (See Illustration opposite).</p> + +<p>In chapter XXXIII. of <i>Passages in the Life of a Radical</i> Bamford speaks +of “the colours; a blue one of silk, with inscriptions in golden letters: +UNITY AND STRENGTH, LIBERTY AND FRATERNITY. A green one of silk, with +golden letters, PARLIAMENTS ANNUAL, SUFFRAGE UNIVERSAL.” Apparently the +Banner here figured is the one of which he writes later in chapter XXXVI.: +“I rejoined my<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span> companions [<i>i.e.</i>, after Peterloo], and forming about a +thousand of them into file, we set off to the sound of fife and drum, +<i>with our only banner waving</i>, and in that form we re-entered the town of +Middleton. The Banner was exhibited from a window of the Suffield’s Arms +public-house.” The Banner is now carefully preserved between sheets of +glass. The photograph was taken under considerable difficulties as regards +light by Mr. R. H. Fletcher, of Eccles. The Chadderton Banner, though much +dilapidated, is also still in existence, but I could not obtain the +address of the person in whose keeping it is. She had left Chadderton, and +was living at Blackpool.</p> + + +<p class="center"><br />2.—BAMFORD’S COTTAGE.</p> + +<p>Some distance higher up the town may be seen the house where Bamford lived +at the date of Peterloo. Over the door is a stone inscribed: “Samuel +Bamford resided and was arrested in this house, Aug. 26, 1819.” Bamford +describes the event in detail in chapter XL of the work named above, +beginning: “About two o’clock on the morning of Thursday, the twenty-sixth +of August, that is, on the tenth morning after the fatal meeting, I was +awoke by footsteps in the street opposite my residence. Presently they +increased in number, etc.” The photograph is again by Mr. R. H. Fletcher. +(See Illustration.) In the Churchyard above may be seen Bamford’s tomb and +also the monument raised to his memory.</p> + +<p> </p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/facing76.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<i>Photo by R. H. Fletcher</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Samuel Bamford’s House at Middleton</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 24em;"><i>To face page 76</i></span></div> +<p> </p> + +<p class="center"><br />3.—CONSTABLES’ STAVES.</p> + +<p>(<i>a</i>) In the Catalogue of the <i>Old Manchester & Salford Exhibition</i> (held +at the Art Gallery in 1904), on p. 27, exhibit 157 appears as “Handcuffs +belonging<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</a></span> to Joe Nadin, Deputy Constable of Manchester at the time of +Peterloo;” lent by G. C. Yates, Esq. On the same page, exhibit 167 is a +“Special Constable’s Staff, used at the time of Peterloo in Manchester, +and then the property of Mr. Beever;” lent by C. Shiel, Esq. This +collection is now for the most part dispersed.</p> + +<p> </p> +<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" summary="table"> +<tr><td><img src="images/facing77a.jpg" alt="" /></td><td><span class="spacer"> </span></td> + <td><img src="images/facing77b.jpg" alt="" /></td><td><span class="spacer"> </span></td> + <td><img src="images/facing77c.jpg" alt="" /></td></tr></table> +<p class="center"><i>Photo by R. H. Fletcher</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="smcap">Three Relics of Peterloo</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 20em;"><i>To face page 77</i></span></p> +<p> </p> + +<p>(<i>b</i>) Mr. T. Swindells, of Monton Green, in the third volume of his +<i>Manchester Streets and Manchester Men</i>, mentions “A Special Constable’s +Staff” given to him by a descendant of James Fildes. It is inscribed: “A +relic of Peterloo. Special Constable’s Staff which belonged to the late +James and Thomas Fildes, grocers, Shudehill, Manchester.”</p> + +<p>(<i>c</i>) In November, 1919, on the afternoon of the day on which I was to +lecture on <i>The Story of Peterloo</i>, at the Rylands Library, Mr. W. W. +Manfield, of Chorlton-cum-Hardy, brought me three interesting relics of +Peterloo, which have been in the possession of his family since 1819. On +the occasion of Peterloo his father and grandfather saw the crowd +streaming through Salford after the catastrophe, and their curiosity led +them to walk out to St. Peter’s fields. There they picked up the three +relics, which have been carefully preserved ever since. One of them is a +long, heavy Constable’s baton, apparently of rosewood, with the Royal Arms +painted at the thicker end. (See Illustration opposite.)</p> + + +<p class="center"><br />4.—HEAD OF FLAGSTAFF.</p> + +<p>The second of Mr. Manfield’s relics is the head of one of the Banner poles +carried at Peterloo. It is shaped like the traditional cap of Liberty, and +inscribed in neat gilt capitals: “Hunt and Liberty.” (See Illustration.)</p> + + +<p class="center"><br /><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span>5.—HUSSAR’S PLUME.</p> + +<p>The third of Mr. Manfield’s relics is a plume of horsehair, apparently +originally dyed red, though (if so) much of the dye has faded. This, it +may be presumed, was the plume from the helmet of one of the Hussars. It +has been mentioned that the 15th Hussars wear a scarlet plume. These three +relics have been photographed on one plate by Mr. Fletcher. (See +Illustration opposite to <a href="#Page_77">page 77</a>.)</p> + + +<p class="center"><br />6.—ACCOUNT-BOOK OF THE RELIEF COMMITTEE.</p> + +<p>In the year of the Centenary, Mr. Guppy was fortunate enough to secure for +the Rylands Library the actual Account-Book used by one of the Committees +formed for the relief of those injured in the fray. A single page of this +book has been photographed by Mr. R. H. Fletcher for the present volume. +(See Illustration.) Mr. Guppy’s account of the volume (<i>Bulletin of +Rylands Library</i>, April to November, 1919, p. 191) is as follows:—</p> + +<p>“The Library has been fortunate in being able to acquire a small octavo +account-book, leather bound, which seems to have been an official record +of the casualties at Peterloo which were dealt with by one of the Relief +Committees. It contains details of the names, addresses, and injuries of +347 individuals, particulars of the successive grants made to them by one +Committee, and references to the grants made by another Committee +(possibly two others).</p> + +<p>The details given are corroborative of many of the statements in Mr. +Bruton’s <i>Story of Peterloo</i>. Thus: the cases include those of Elizabeth +Gaunt (mentioned on pp. 274 and 275), of Mrs. Fildes (on p. 274), of +Thomas Redford (on pp. 285, 291, and 294). There are references to the +loose timber (see pp. 269, 284 and 294), the injuries to Special +Constables (see p. 280), the fight near the Friends’ Meeting-house (see +pp. 284 and 289), the oak trees growing near that building (see pp. 269, +294), the white hat as a symbol of Radicalism (see p. 273), the fear of +losing employment evinced by the wounded (see p. 291), the infantry +intercepting fugitives (see p. 290), the child killed by a trooper in +Cooper Street (see p. 277), and so on. The sum total voted by this +Committee appears to have been £687; it must be remembered, however, that +the sum of £3,000 mentioned on p. 291 as having been subscribed may have +been used partly for legal expenses.</p> + +<p> <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</a></span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="large">One Page of the Account Book of the Relief Committee.</span></p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/page79_tmb.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<a href="images/page79.jpg"><small>Larger Image</small></a><br /> +<br /> +<i>By permission of Mr. H. Guppy.</i><span class="spacer"> </span><i>Photo by R. H. Fletcher.</i></div> +<p> </p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span>Since this manuscript account-book came to light, Mr. Bruton has +discovered a printed Report of the Relief Committee, in which 560 cases +are described, and the amount raised to date is given as £3,408 1s. 8d., +and pronounced to be inadequate for 600 people. It also gives the amount +spent on legal expenses as £1,077.”</p> + + +<p class="center"><br />7.—ACCOUNT-BOOK RECORDING AMOUNTS RAISED FOR THE RELIEF OF SPECIAL +CONSTABLES & THEIR FAMILIES.</p> + +<p>I have to thank Dr. A. A. Mumford for calling my attention to another +account-book connected with Peterloo, which I believe he met with while +going over the Crossley papers at the Chetham Library. Its number in the +Library Catalogue is MS. B. 3. 70. It is a small note-book ruled for cash, +and entitled: “Subscriptions for Special Constables. Nos. 10 and 11.” +There is a note of a Resolution carried on August 27th, 1819, to the +effect that a Relief Fund should be raised on behalf of Special Constables +injured at Peterloo and their families. The subscriptions recorded in this +book range from £1 to £10 10s., and amount in all to about £400.</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</a></span></p> +<h2>APPENDIX B.</h2> + + +<p class="center"><br />1.—NOTE ON THE CASUALTIES AT PETERLOO.</p> + +<p>On few points do the accounts of Peterloo vary more than on the question +of the casualties. There is sufficient historical material available to +enable us to investigate this matter in detail, but the task would be a +gruesome one, and no useful object would be attained if it were +accomplished. On the other hand, a few words may serve to show whereabouts +the truth lies.</p> + +<p>In the <i>Cambridge Modern History</i> (Vol. X., pp. 580, 581) it is stated +that “a man was killed and forty were injured.” In the <i>Political History +of England</i> (1906, Vol. XI., pp. 178, 179) we read that “happily the +actual loss of life did not exceed five or six, but a much larger number +were more or less wounded.” A number of the most important school +histories in use at the present time reproduce one or the other of these +statements <i>verbatim</i>.</p> + +<p>If we turn to the contemporary records, they are somewhat conflicting. The +hurried estimates given by the local papers immediately after the +catastrophe (<i>e.g.</i>, one newspaper reported twelve killed) had to be +corrected later. The most general estimate seems to be “eleven killed and +between 500 and 600 wounded.” When we come to examine these figures in +detail, however, these points emerge: (1) “Killed”<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span> is evidently taken to +include the cases of those who died after lingering (possibly) for some +weeks. (2) The summary includes the casualties due to the firing of the +infantry in the neighbourhood of New Cross, some hours after the great +event; included in the list, also will be the child (Fildes) knocked from +its mother’s arms by one of the yeomanry as they were riding to the +meeting.</p> + +<p>Archibald Prentice, in his <i>Historical Sketches and Personal Recollections +of Manchester</i> (p. 167), states that eleven were killed, that 420 were +wounded, and that there still remained (according to the Relief +Committee’s Report) 140 cases to be investigated, making a total of 560. +Mr. John Benjamin Smith (who very likely refreshed his memory by looking +up records when writing his Reminiscences) gives the same result. Mr. J. +C. Hobhouse, speaking in the House of Commons, on May 19th, 1821, said +that “he held in his hand a list of killed and wounded running to 25-30 +sheets, and defied them to disprove it.” It is clear, then, that these +estimates are quoted from the Committee’s Report, and to this it will be +well now to turn.</p> + +<p>With the kind assistance of Mr. Swann, of the Reference Library, I have +been able to find one (and only one) copy of this Report. It is bound up +with a series of papers catalogued as “Lancashire and Yorkshire Tracts,” +at the Manchester Reference Library. (The Reference number is “Lancashire +and Yorkshire Tracts; Barlow’s Historical Collector. H. 63. 3. No. 3 +(15104)”). It is entitled: “Report of the Metropolitan and Central +Committee appointed for the Relief of the Manchester Sufferers, with an +Appendix containing the names of the sufferers and the nature and extent +of their injuries; also an account of the distribution of funds, and other +documents. Published by order of the Committee. London, 1820.” This<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</a></span> +Committee seems to have been formed by amalgamating several organisations +in the metropolis which sprang into being as a result of public sympathy +with the sufferers, and it worked in conjunction with the Manchester and +other Lancashire Committees. The subscriptions recorded to date amount to +£3,408 1s. 8d. of which £1,206 13s. 8d. had been distributed, £250 having +been received from the local Manchester Committees. The amount expended on +law charges and expenses of witnesses is given as £1,077 6s. 9d.; +advertisements and sundries cost £355 13s. 6d.; and this leaves a balance +of over £768, which is pronounced inadequate to deal with the cases that +remain. A fresh appeal is therefore made to the British Public. A +Deputation was sent from London to investigate cases, and this Deputation +reports, in January, 1820, that out of 420 sufferers visited and relieved +113 are females; that 130 received severe sabre-cuts, 14 of these being +females. (To be quite safe, we must admit the possibility that the term +“sufferers” may sometimes include members of the families of those killed +or injured.) There follow 38 pages filled with the names of those killed +and wounded at Peterloo, some 430 in all, with full details of their +injuries, and in the case of the former the description is “Killed, <i>or</i>, +who have subsequently died in consequence of injuries there received,” the +number of these being given as eleven. Of these eleven: two were “sabred;” +one was “sabred and trampled upon;” one was “sabred and stabbed;” one +“sabred and crushed;” two (one of them a woman) “rode over by the +cavalry;” one “trampled by the cavalry;” one “inwardly crushed;” and one +(a woman) “thrown into a cellar.” In the case of two of these the words +are added “killed on the spot.” The child killed in Cooper Street +completes the total.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</a></span>One of the Relief Committees met at Mr. Prentice’s warehouse, and the care +with which the various cases were investigated, and successive grants made +from the funds of the different Committees, is clearly shown by the +details given in the account-book secured by Mr. Guppy in 1919 for the +Rylands Library, which is mentioned above.</p> + +<p>Perhaps it will never be possible to say exactly how many were left dead +on the field. One, at anyrate, who died at once, or very shortly +afterwards, was (by a strange irony) a Special Constable, and this is +probably the “one man killed” of some of the accounts. It will be +remembered that Lieut. Jolliffe reported “two women not likely to recover; +one man in a dying state; and two or three reputed dead;” in the letter +quoted above, describing his visit to the Infirmary on the Sunday +following the event.</p> + +<p>Most of the cases investigated by the Committees belonged to the side of +the Reformers; but it must not be forgotten that the other side claimed to +have serious casualties. Mr. Francis Phillips, <i>e.g.</i>, enumerates the +casualties to the troops, and an estimate of these is given also in the +Centenary Volume of the Cheshire Yeomanry; we have already seen above, +moreover, that a subscription list was opened for the families of the +Special Constables, and that the appeal met with a generous response. It +is a curious feature of the case that each side seems to be anxious to +make its casualty list as imposing as possible. An interesting summary of +the various estimates is given by MacDonnell in his <i>State Trials</i>. This +summary includes the Official Report from the Infirmary, and the list of +casualties to the troops. Without pursuing the matter further, we may say +that a careful examination of the somewhat confusing evidence would seem +to show that the estimate “eleven killed and between<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span> 500 and 600 wounded” +will not prove to be far wrong, provided that (1) we understand “killed” +to include those who died as the result of injuries received on the field; +(2) we include in the general total the casualties incurred during the +disturbances some hours later in the neighbourhood of New Cross. At least +one list, published subsequently, brings the total of killed up to +fourteen.</p> + +<hr style="width: 25%;" /> + +<p>Two points not directly concerned with this discussion are dealt with by +the Relief Committee, and are sufficiently interesting to be recorded: (1) +The Committee paid out £710 “on account of the Trial at York; the +Manchester Committee voting £100 for the same object.” (2) The Deputation +sent from London to investigate the cases, mentioned in their Report some +striking details of the conditions of life amongst the operatives. To +quote only two sentences: “in no one instance among the weavers did your +Deputation see a morsel of animal food, and they ascertained that in most +families where there were children the taste of meat was unknown from one +year to another.” “Six shillings a week was the average wage of an +able-bodied and industrious weaver. Many could not get this.”</p> + + +<p class="center"><br />2.—PRESENCE OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN AT PETERLOO.</p> + +<p>It has often been asserted that the peaceful intentions of the crowd at +Peterloo are attested by the presence among them of women and young +children. As every detail of evidence is of value, I give here a sentence +from a letter which I received from Principal<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</a></span> Reynolds: “My father was +there, in his mother’s arms, though only one year old; so my grandmother +told me.”</p> + + +<p class="center"><br />3.—SOME GLEANINGS FROM THE SCRAP-BOOKS.</p> + +<p>It was the custom in the early decades of the nineteenth century, when +newspapers were dear and newspaper files were not available, as there were +no free libraries, to collect newspaper cuttings and illustrations, with +tracts and “broadsides,” election squibs and so forth, in large +scrap-books. Thus, at the Peel Park Library is preserved the scrap-book of +Joseph Brotherton (for many years Member for Salford), running to over +forty volumes. The Greaves scrap-book at the Reference Library contains a +valuable collection of this kind. The Owen collection at the same Library +fills over eighty volumes. At the Chetham Library may be seen Lord +Ellesmere’s scrap-book and a number of others. From many references to +Peterloo in these books we may select the three items which follow: The +Greaves collection contains a rare print of Peterloo, somewhat lurid in +its detail. Mr. Albert Nicholson has in his possession a highly-coloured +copy of this, which he has shown me. No other copies seem to be known.</p> + +<p>I have to thank Mr. J. J. Phelps for calling my attention to two papers in +a scrap-book at the Chetham Library which he conjectures to have been that +of Mr. Francis Phillips, the protagonist on behalf of the magistrates, and +the author of <i>An Exposure of the Calumnies, &c.</i> One of these is the +actual subpœna which Mr. Phillips received, summoning him to give +evidence in the trial at York: “there to testify the truth on our behalf +against Henry Hunt and others for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span> certain misdemeanours whereof they are +indicted.” (MS. B. 9. 41. 110. p. 43.).</p> + +<p>The other paper is of some importance as it fixes the date of the +embodiment of the Manchester Yeomanry. In <i>The Story of Peterloo</i> (p. 13) +some details are given in support of a conjecture that the corps was +formed later than March in 1817. The scrap-book just quoted confirms this +conjecture, for there appears a printed copy of a letter addressed to the +Boroughreeves and Constables of Manchester and Salford, and bearing over a +hundred signatures (that of Mr. Phillips coming second), asking that a +meeting may be convened with the object of forming such a corps. In +response to this appeal the Boroughreeves and Constables summoned a +meeting for the purpose, in a letter dated Manchester, June the 16th, +1817. (MS B. 9. 41. 110. p. 22). With this date as a guide, it was easy to +find in the advertisement columns of <i>Wheeler’s Manchester Chronicle</i> for +Saturday, June the 21st, 1817, a copy of both letters, a list of the +signatures, and the announcement that the proposed meeting was actually +held on June the 19th, 1817, when it was resolved: “that under the present +circumstances it is expedient to form a body of Yeomanry Cavalry in the +Towns and neighbourhood of Manchester and Salford.” Details follow as to +Government allowances for uniform, etc., and as to the possibility of +amalgamating with similar corps in the surrounding towns, should such be +formed. Each man was to provide his own horse.</p> + +<p>This information has an important bearing on the tragedy of Peterloo, and +taken in conjunction with the Resolution of the Magistrates mentioned in +<i>The Story of Peterloo</i> (p. 13), leaves no doubt as to what was the nature +of the “present circumstances” that called the corps into being.</p> + + +<p class="center"><br /><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span>4.—EXPLANATION OF THE CONTEMPORARY PLAN AND PICTURE OF PETERLOO.</p> + +<p>(<i>a</i>) The Contemporary Plan of St. Peter’s Field which appears on the +following page was published in Farquharson’s verbatim Report of the Trial +in 1822. As the lettering is small, some explanation is necessary.</p> + +<p>The shaded area in the centre represents the open space on which the +tragedy was enacted. To the south of it is clearly seen the “raised +ground” mentioned by Stanley, and shown also in his Plan. The windmill +which stood near, and gave its name to Windmill Street, had disappeared +some years before. The site of it is now occupied by the Central Station +Approach.</p> + +<p>On the shaded space are marked: “Hustings;” “Carriage” (<i>i.e.</i>, Mr. +Hunt’s carriage, marked also on Stanley’s Plan); the double line of +“Constables;” and the “Manchester Yeomanry,” drawn up in front of the row +of houses in Mount Street, labelled: “Magistrates assembled here.” The +Friends’ Meeting House is marked “Quaker’s Meeting House,” and the +enclosing wall is stated to measure in height “3 ft. 7 in. on the inside” +and “10 ft. 3 in. on the outside.” These measurements would be inserted, +probably, in connection with the statement that one of the Cavalry jumped +his horse over this wall. Apparently a gate and posts cross Mount Street +in front of the Meeting House, and lead into “St. Peter’s Field,” across +which two dotted lines indicate the <i>projected</i> line of Peter Street.</p> + +<p> <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span></p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/page89_tmb.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<a href="images/page89.jpg"><small>Larger Image</small></a><br /> +<i>Photo by R. H. Fletcher.</i><br /> +<br /> +<span class="large">Plan of Peterloo.</span><br /> +From Farquharson’s Report of the Trial, 1822. (See <a href="#Page_88">page 88</a>.)</div> +<p> </p> + +<p>The position of the Troops and the line of their approach to the Field are +shown as follows: The “31st Infantry” are drawn up in Brazennose Street, +the upper end of which is also blocked with a gate and posts; the “88th +Infantry” are lined up in Dickinson Street; in Portland Street are the +“Manchester Yeomanry,” and their course is shown by a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</a></span> dotted line up +Portland Street, along Nicholas Street, down Cooper Street, and then round +the corner of Cooper’s garden wall (now the site of the north-western +corner of the Midland Hotel) into Mount Street; the Plan stating that “The +Manchester Yeomanry came this way to the ground;” another troop of the +“Manchester Yeomanry” is drawn up in front of St. John’s Church, in Byrom +Street; facing them, in the same street, are shown the “15th Hussars” in +two sections, presumably representing the “two squadrons” mentioned by +Lieutenant Jolliffe in his letter; lastly, the “Cheshire Yeomanry” are +drawn up in St. John’s Street, off Deansgate, and the line of approach of +all these mounted troops is shown by a dotted line passing along Byrom +Street, St. John’s Street, southward down Deansgate, then along Fleet +Street, up Lower Mosley Street, and along the “raised ground” already +mentioned to St. Peter’s Field, the inscription on the Plan reading: “The +15th Hussars, one troop of the Manchester and Cheshire Yeomanry came this +way to the ground.” The artillery are not shewn.</p> + +<p>The scale of yards given on the Plan shows that Stanley’s estimate of a +hundred yards as the distance from Mr. Buxton’s house to the Hustings was +exactly correct.</p> + +<p> </p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/facing90_tmb.jpg" alt="" /><br /> +<a href="images/facing90.jpg"><small>Larger Image</small></a><br /> +A VIEW OF St PETER’S PLACE<br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 24em;"><i>To face page 90</i></span></div> +<p> </p> + +<p>(<i>b</i>) Wroe’s Contemporary Picture of Peterloo, which is shewn on the +following page, is perhaps the best of a number of sketches extant. The +details are fairly accurate. In the background, on the extreme left, is +seen (to quote Bamford) “the corner of a garden wall, round which the +Manchester Yeomanry, in blue and white uniform, came trotting, sword in +hand, to the front of a row of new houses.” The “corner” is on the site of +the north-western corner of the Midland Hotel. The “new houses” were on +the site of the present Midland Buffet. Mr. Ewart’s factory, in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span> the +distance, was just off Lower Mosley Street. The row of houses to the right +of this, in the background, was on the upper side of Windmill Street. The +Hustings are on the site of the south-eastern corner of the Free Trade +Hall. Standing on them we may distinguish Mr. Hunt and the Leader of the +Manchester Female Reformers. Around them are the Banners of the various +contingents; we may even make out the legend “No Corn Laws” on the one in +front. The Banner-poles are shaped to resemble caps of Liberty, as shown +in another of our illustrations. The crowd are occupying the site of the +Free Trade Hall, the Theatre Royal, the Y.M.C.A., the Gaiety, and a number +of adjoining buildings.</p> + +<p>The moment seized by the artist for his picture is that in which the +Manchester Yeomanry, many of whom are scattered and entangled among the +crowd, have reached the Hustings, while in the distance the Hussars can +just be seen lining up in Mount Street and charging to their relief. The +crowd, consisting of men, women and children, are seen dispersing in all +directions.</p> + +<p>The view might be imagined to have been taken from the roof of a building +which then occupied the site of the present Albert Hall, in Peter Street. +Other contemporary prints include St. Peter’s Church and the Friends’ +Meeting House in the picture.</p> + + +<p> </p><p> </p> +<hr style="width: 50%;" /> +<p><strong>Footnotes:</strong></p> + +<p><a name='f_1' id='f_1' href='#fna_1'>[1]</a> I met Mr. Buxton on the steps of his house, not at all aware till then +that his <i>residence</i> was at or near the place of meeting. I had been +directed to his <i>shop</i>, considerably beyond the square, to which I was +proceeding. I state this to prove that what I afterwards saw was purely +accidental, and that I had no previous intention of witnessing in detail +the transactions of the day. As I came from the bottom of Alport Street, +on the Altrincham side of Manchester, my original directions were indeed +to pass through St. Peter’s field as the shortest line, but I had taken a +circuitous route to avoid the meeting, which led me to the corner of it +near Mr. Buxton’s house.</p> + + +<p><a name='f_2' id='f_2' href='#fna_2'>[2]</a> It has been stated, upon evidence which I should be unwilling to +discredit, that the body of persons more immediately in contact with the +hustings were of Hunt’s party. My reasons for believing them at the time +to be (as I was told) special constables, were because they resembled them +in appearance, were connected in their lines, had their hats on, and +staves of office occasionally appeared amongst them. Mr. Hay, in his +official letter, says: “A body of special constables took their ground, +about two hundred in number, close to the hustings, from whence there was +a line of communication to the house where we were.” This is precisely my +view of the case; doubtless, had the communication been cut, he would have +noticed it.</p> + +<p><a name='f_3' id='f_3' href='#fna_3'>[3]</a> Some, by being better mounted or rather in advance, might have been +more moderate in their pace, but generally speaking it was very rapid, and +I use the word gallop, as conveying the best idea of their approach.</p> + +<p><a name='f_4' id='f_4' href='#fna_4'>[4]</a> I am particular in mentioning these minute circumstances, because in +this and some other points in which I could not be mistaken, I have been +strongly contradicted.</p> + +<p><a name='f_5' id='f_5' href='#fna_5'>[5]</a> It has been often asked when and where the cavalry struck the people. +I can only say that from the moment they began to force their way through +the crowd towards the hustings swords were up and swords were down, but +whether they fell with the sharp or flat side, of course I cannot pretend +to give an opinion.</p> + +<p><a name='f_6' id='f_6' href='#fna_6'>[6]</a> On quitting the ground I for the first time observed that strong +bodies of infantry were posted in the streets, on opposite sides of the +square; their appearance might probably have increased the alarm and would +certainly have impeded the progress of a mob wishing to retreat in either +of those directions. When I saw them they were resting on their arms, and +I believe they remained stationary, taking no part in the transaction.</p> + +<p><a name='f_7' id='f_7' href='#fna_7'>[7]</a> On entering Mosley Street at 12 o’clock I stopped to question some +persons on the footway respecting the proceedings of the day. When about +to proceed, I was recommended to move from the middle of the street to the +path, as the mob were advancing. I declined, suspecting my advisers might +be radicals, adding: “I am on the King’s highway, and shall remain where I +am.” I mention this because I have heard it reported that I was insulted +by the Ashton people, which may have originated from the above account.</p> + +<p><a name='f_8' id='f_8' href='#fna_8'>[8]</a> [In the copy of Farquharson’s verbatim Report of the Trial, which is +preserved at the Reference Library, Manchester, this “not” is omitted. The +omission is, of course, due to a misprint, and someone has inserted “not” +in pencil. Similarly, in my own copy of Farquharson’s Report, someone has +inserted the “not” in ink. McDonnell, in his “State Trials,” inserted the +“not.” Mr. McKennell’s evidence, as reported in Farquharson, is as follows +(pp. 169, 170; he was cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant Hullock):—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> +<p>By whom was the Riot Act read?</p> + +<p>—I never heard it read.</p> + +<p>You heard no such thing?</p> + +<p>—I did not.</p></div> + +<p><span class="smcap">Editor.</span>]</p> + +<p><a name='f_9' id='f_9' href='#fna_9'>[9]</a> [St. John Street or Byrom Street.—<span class="smcap">Editor.</span>]</p> + +<p><a name='f_10' id='f_10' href='#fna_10'>[10]</a> [South-east would be more correct.—<span class="smcap">Editor.</span>]</p> + +<p><a name='f_11' id='f_11' href='#fna_11'>[11]</a> [East would be more correct. The Cheshire Yeomanry filed along the +south side. The arrows in Stanley’s Plan make this clear.—<span class="smcap">Editor.</span>]</p> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Three Accounts of Peterloo, by +Edward Stanley and William Jolliffe and John Benjamin Smith + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THREE ACCOUNTS OF PETERLOO *** + +***** This file should be named 37004-h.htm or 37004-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/0/0/37004/ + +Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images +generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian +Libraries.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing21.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing21.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..caa9dde --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing21.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing27.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing27.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1391a05 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing27.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing59.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing59.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7a78e5d --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing59.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing69.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing69.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ab6aaa --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing69.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing71a.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing71a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e2fd959 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing71a.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing71b.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing71b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e5cd637 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing71b.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing75.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing75.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b202f9c --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing75.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing76.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing76.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..efbf6b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing76.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing77a.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing77a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..218fec2 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing77a.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing77b.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing77b.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4039c64 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing77b.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing77c.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing77c.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fd9651 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing77c.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing90.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing90.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a5af262 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing90.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/facing90_tmb.jpg b/37004-h/images/facing90_tmb.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0790703 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/facing90_tmb.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/frontis.jpg b/37004-h/images/frontis.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e47193b --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/frontis.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page44.jpg b/37004-h/images/page44.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d746b17 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page44.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page44_tmb.jpg b/37004-h/images/page44_tmb.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3f2874c --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page44_tmb.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page79.jpg b/37004-h/images/page79.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b2ae067 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page79.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page79_tmb.jpg b/37004-h/images/page79_tmb.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2c89e4f --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page79_tmb.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page8.jpg b/37004-h/images/page8.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d971065 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page8.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page89.jpg b/37004-h/images/page89.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ca51dc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page89.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page89_tmb.jpg b/37004-h/images/page89_tmb.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e962aa --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page89_tmb.jpg diff --git a/37004-h/images/page8_tmb.jpg b/37004-h/images/page8_tmb.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a6286a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/37004-h/images/page8_tmb.jpg diff --git a/37004.txt b/37004.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b578fea --- /dev/null +++ b/37004.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2809 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Three Accounts of Peterloo, by +Edward Stanley and William Jolliffe and John Benjamin Smith + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Three Accounts of Peterloo + By Eyewitnesses Bishop Stanley, Lord Hylton, John Benjamin + Smith with Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the Trial + +Author: Edward Stanley + William Jolliffe + John Benjamin Smith + +Editor: F. A. Bruton + +Release Date: August 7, 2011 [EBook #37004] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THREE ACCOUNTS OF PETERLOO *** + + + + +Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images +generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian +Libraries.) + + + + + + + + + + PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER + + HISTORICAL SERIES + No. XXXIX. + + THREE ACCOUNTS OF + PETERLOO. + + + + + Published by the University of Manchester at + THE UNIVERSITY PRESS (H. M. MCKECHNIE, M.A., Secretary) + 12 LIME GROVE, OXFORD ROAD, MANCHESTER + + LONGMANS, GREEN & CO. + + LONDON: + 39 Paternoster Row, E.C.4 + + NEW YORK: + 443-449 Fourth Avenue and Thirtieth Street + + BOMBAY: + 336 Hornby Road + + CALCUTTA: + 6 Old Court House Street + + MADRAS: + 167 Mount Road + + + + +[Illustration: BISHOP STANLEY 1779-1849 + +_From a Print lent by Lord Sheffield_ + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_Frontispiece_] + + + + + Three Accounts + OF + Peterloo + + BY EYEWITNESSES + + BISHOP STANLEY + LORD HYLTON + JOHN BENJAMIN SMITH + + with + + Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the Trial + + + Edited by F. A. BRUTON, M.A., Litt.D + of the Manchester Grammar School + + + MANCHESTER: + AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS + + LONGMANS, GREEN & CO. + LONDON, NEW YORK, BOMBAY, etc. + 1921 + + + + +PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER + +No. CXL. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + PAGE + + Introduction vii + + Bishop Stanley 1 + + Stanley's Account of Peterloo 10 + + Stanley's Evidence at the Trial in 1822 24 + + Sir William Jolliffe, afterwards Lord Hylton 45 + + Lieutenant Jolliffe's Account of Peterloo 48 + + John Benjamin Smith 59 + + Mr. J. B. Smith's Account of Peterloo 62 + + + APPENDIX A 75 + Some Relics of Peterloo:-- + 1. A Banner carried at Peterloo. + 2. Bamford's Cottage at Middleton. + 3. Constables' Staves. + 4. Head of Flagstaff. + 5. Hussar's Plume. + 6. Account-Book of the Relief Committee. + 7. Account-Book recording amounts raised + for the relief of Special Constables + and their families. + + APPENDIX B 81 + 1. Note on the Casualties at Peterloo. + 2. Presence of women and children at Peterloo. + 3. Some gleanings from the Scrap-Books. + 4. Explanation of the Contemporary Plan and + Picture of Peterloo. + + + + +ILLUSTRATIONS. + + + PAGE + + Portrait of Bishop Stanley _Frontispiece_ + + Stanley's Plan of Peterloo 8 + + Nadin, the Deputy Constable _Facing_ 21 + + "Orator Hunt" " 27 + + Plan of Peterloo, compiled from the + contemporary Plans and modern Street Maps 44 + + Portrait of Mr. John Benjamin Smith _Facing_ 59 + + The Hunt Memorial at the Manchester Reform + Club " 69 + + The Peterloo Medal " 71 + + The Banner carried at Peterloo by the + Middleton Contingent " 75 + + Samuel Bamford's Cottage at Middleton " 76 + + Three Relics picked up on the Field of Peterloo " 77 + + A Page of the Relief Committee's Account Book 79 + + Plan of Peterloo published with the Report of + the Trial in 1822 89 + + Wroe's Picture of Peterloo, showing the + Manchester Yeomanry riding for the Hustings _Facing_ 90 + + + + +INTRODUCTION. + + +Of the three accounts of the Tragedy of Peterloo given here, two (the +first and third) have never been published before. The second appeared in +the "Life of Lord Sidmouth" in 1847. All three, written with care and +judgment, by men who afterwards rose to eminence, form a valuable +contribution to the understanding of an event, the accounts of which have +been for the most part distorted and misleading. Moreover, as each of the +three writers deals with a different phase of the day's happenings, the +accounts complement one another. + +The Editor had already arranged for the publication of the first, when he +received the following letter from Lord Sheffield, dated Penrhos, +Holyhead, August 21st, 1919:-- + + "It is many years since I had the copy of the Rev. E. Stanley's + report, and no doubt it was one of the lithographed copies you + mention. + + I think it would be well if it were published, along with the evidence + to which you refer. I also think the Plan, of which you speak, should + be added, and the reports of Jolliffe and J. B. Smith." + +Lord Sheffield supported his suggestion by enclosing a cheque towards the +cost of printing, and this made easy the publication of the whole. Lord +Sheffield also kindly lent the portrait of Bishop Stanley, which appears +as the Frontispiece. + +Acknowledgments are due, besides: (1) to Mr. Henry Guppy, M.A., for +permission to use the blocks of Wroe's picture of Peterloo, and the Plan +from the "Story of Peterloo" in the Bulletin of the John Rylands Library +for October, 1919; and to copy a page of the Account-book of the Relief +Committee; (2) to Lady Durning Lawrence, who (with the late Mr. C. W. +Sutton, M.A.) gave permission to print the Extract from the Reminiscences +of Mr. J. B. Smith, and to reproduce his portrait; (3) to Mr. W. Marcroft +of Southport; and Messrs. Hirst & Rennie of Oldham, for the loan of the +blocks of "Orator Hunt," the "Hunt Memorial," and the "Peterloo Medal"; +(4) to Mr. John Murray for leave to reprint Lieutenant Jolliffe's letter; +(5) to Mr. W. W. Manfield, for the loan of the three Relics of Peterloo; +and (6) to Mr. R. H. Fletcher, amateur photographer, of Eccles, for +photographing the relics, etc. + +F. A. B. + + + + +Three Accounts of Peterloo + +BISHOP STANLEY + + +The Rev. Edward Stanley (1779-1849) was the second son of Sir J. T. +Stanley, the Sixth Baronet, and Margaret Owen, of Penrhos, Anglesey. His +elder brother was the first Baron Stanley of Alderley. As a boy, he had a +natural inclination for the sea, but this was not encouraged. For +thirty-two years he was Rector of Alderley, in Cheshire. While making +himself beloved as a Parish Priest, he found time for many scientific and +other interests. His _Familiar History of Birds_ is a standard work; he +advocated, and assisted in, the teaching of Science and Temperance at +Alderley; and he became one of the first Presidents of the Manchester +Statistical Society. Though he declined the See of Manchester, when it was +offered him, he accepted from Lord Melbourne, in 1837, the Bishopric of +Norwich, and introduced a number of reforms into that diocese. A short +memoir of him was written by his son, the famous Dean of Westminster. + +At the date of Peterloo, a number of clergymen sat on the Bench of +Magistrates for Lancashire and Cheshire, but Stanley stated clearly at the +Trial that he was not a Magistrate. He was then forty years of age, and +Rector of Alderley, and in his evidence he was careful to say that his +narrative of Peterloo was compiled about two months after the event, for +private circulation among his friends, and had never been published. It is +clear that a copy was in the hands of Counsel who cross-examined him at +the Trial in 1822. The manuscript is very neatly written (I should +conjecture by Stanley himself) on nine large quarto pages, the plan being +drawn by the same hand, and the notes given at the end. I have thought it +more convenient for the reader to have the notes thrown to the foot of the +respective pages. The manuscript was lithographed, in 1819, by the +Lithographic Press, Westminster, and entered at Stationers' Hall. I found +on enquiry that there was one copy in the Manuscript Department of the +British Museum (Add. MSS., 30142, ff. 78-83). It is addressed to +Major-Gen. Sir Robert Wilson, and sealed with the Stanley crest. The +authorship was not known, and the Keeper of the MSS. was glad to be able +to add this to the document as the result of my communication. In the +Printed Book Department of the British Museum there is a second copy, +catalogued under Manchester, with press-mark 8133i. There is no trace of +Stanley's MS. in the Public Records Office. I can find no other copy but +the one at the Manchester Reference Library, which is in excellent +preservation, and has recently been rebound. Mr. J. C. Hobhouse quoted +from Stanley's narrative once in a speech in the House of Commons. +Speaking on May 19th, 1821, in support of a Petition for an enquiry as to +the outrage at Manchester, Mr. Hobhouse, following Sir Francis Burdett, +said: "The Rev. Mr. Stanley, who watched from a room above the +magistrates, saw no stones or sticks used, though if any stone larger than +a pebble had been thrown, he must have seen it." I have not found any +other reference to the narrative except that made by Counsel at the Trial, +and that is recorded in the Evidence which follows. + + * * * * * + +Three notes may find a place here. The first two refer to points mentioned +by Stanley:-- + +1. Pigot and Dean's _Manchester Directory_ for 1819 mentions: + + (_a_) Edmund Buxton, Builder, &c., No. 6, Mount Street, Dickinson + Street. + + (_b_) Thomas & Matthew Pickford & Co., Carriers, Oxford Street. + +I do not find Mr. Buxton's "shop," which is mentioned by Stanley; nor are +Pickfords described as "timber merchants," though timber may easily have +been stacked in their yard. + +Stanley's movements on reaching Manchester are not, at a first reading, +quite clear. Riding in from Alderley, he seems to have approached by way +of Oxford Road, passing (as he tells us) the Manchester Yeomanry, posted +at Pickford's yard. At twelve o'clock, he turned up Mosley Street (very +likely to avoid the crowd which was already filling the Square) and in +Mosley Street he met the contingent of Reformers coming from Ashton. He +then proceeded to Mr. Buxton's _shop_, which seems to have been near the +lower end of Deansgate. Not finding Mr. Buxton there, he was directed to +his _residence_ in Mount Street. The shortest way to Mount Street from +Alport would have taken him through the crowd. He therefore approached +Mount Street "by a circuitous route to avoid the meeting" (possibly by +Fleet Street and Lower Mosley Street, the route afterwards taken by the +Hussars), and met Mr. Buxton on the steps of his house. + +Stanley evidently knew little of Manchester. He confesses in his narrative +that he had not been in St. Peter's field before or since the tragedy; in +his evidence he said: "I know no street," and stated that he could not +locate the Friends' Meeting-house. + +2. Stanley's estimate of a hundred yards, as the distance from the +hustings to Mr. Buxton's house can be demonstrated to-day to be almost +exactly correct. This is only one of many points in his narrative which +show what a shrewd, quick, and accurate observer he was. When Mr. Hulton +was asked, at the Trial, to estimate the same distance, he conjectured +four hundred yards, and this was actually quoted as the distance in one of +the standard histories of the period. + +For the rest, it seems better to leave Stanley's extremely lucid account +to speak for itself. To annotate it in detail would be to spoil its +completeness. As has been stated above, each observer witnessed the scene +from his own stand-point. A complete picture can only be obtained by +forming a mosaic of the various reports. Stanley's narrative is that of an +outsider, who came upon the scene unexpectedly, and watched the whole with +the eye of a statesman and a statistician. Lieutenant Jolliffe's account +gives the view of a young soldier, a stranger to Manchester, who rode in +the charge of the Hussars, and afterwards took part with them in the +patrol of the town. Mr. J. B. Smith speaks from the point of view of a +Manchester business man, familiar with the civic and economic conditions +that led to the catastrophe, and his narrative reaches a few days beyond +the tragedy itself. Samuel Bamford's account--too well-known to need +repetition here--was written from the stand-point of a local weaver, who +had already suffered for his outspoken advocacy of Parliamentary Reform, +had a large share in organising the Peterloo meeting, and served a term of +imprisonment for his share in the proceedings. An attempt to dovetail +these and other Reports into a continuous narrative has already been made +in _The Story of Peterloo_ (Rylands Library Lectures, 1919.). + +3. Stanley's Evidence at the Trial, which is here printed immediately +after his connected narrative, has been taken from McDonnell's _State +Trials_, supplemented--where passages are omitted by McDonnell--by +Farquharson's verbatim report, issued by the Defence after the Trial. As a +matter of fact McDonnell made use of Farquharson's version. + + * * * * * + +The portrait of Bishop Stanley which appears here is from a print kindly +lent for the purpose by Lord Sheffield. + + + + +Stanley's Notes attached to his Plan + + +Never having seen St. Peter's fields before or since, I cannot pretend to +speak accurately as to distance, etc. I should, at a guess, state the +distance from the hustings to Mr. Buxton's house to be about a hundred +yards, which may serve as a general scale to the rest of the plan. + + +KEY TO STANLEY'S PLAN. + +1. The hustings. The arrow shows the direction in which the orators +addressed the mob, the great majority being in front: F, F, F. + +2. The Barouche in which Hunt arrived, the line from it showing its +entrance and approach. + +3. The spot on which the Manchester Yeomanry Cavalry halted previous to +their charge; the dotted lines in front showing the direction of their +charge on attacking the hustings. + + +[Illustration: Stanley's Plan] + + +4. On this spot the woman alluded to in the account (p. 15) was wounded +and remained apparently dead, till removed at the conclusion of the +business. + +5. Here the 15th Dragoons paused for a few moments before they proceeded +in the direction marked by the dotted line. + +6. The Cheshire Cavalry; my attention was so much taken up with the +proceedings of the Manchester Yeomanry Cavalry, etc., and the dispersion +in front of the hustings, that I cannot speak accurately as to their +subsequent movements. + +7, 7, 7. The band of special constables, _apparently_ surrounding the +hustings. + +8, 8, 8. The mob in dense mass; their banners displayed in different +parts, as at x, x. + +9, 9, 9. A space comparatively vacant; partially occupied by stragglers; +the mob condensing near the hustings for the purpose of seeing and +hearing. + +10, 10, 10. Raised ground on which many spectators had taken a position; a +commotion amongst them first announced the approach of the cavalry; their +elevated situation commanding a more extensive view. + + + + +Bishop Stanley's Account of Peterloo + + +Soon after one o'clock on the 16th of August, I went to call on Mr. +Buxton, with whom I had some private business. I was directed to his house +overlooking St. Peter's field, where I unexpectedly found the magistrates +assembled.[1] I went up to their room, and remained there seven or eight +minutes. Hunt was not then arrived; a murmur running through the crowd +prepared us for his approach; a numerous vanguard preceded him, and in a +few moments the Barouche appeared in which he sat with his coadjutors, +male and female; a tremendous shout instantly welcomed him; he proceeded +slowly towards the hustings. On approaching the knot of constables the +carriage stopped a short time, I conceive from the difficulty of making +way through a band of men who were little inclined to fall back for his +admission. The Barouche at length attained its position close to the +hustings, and the speakers stepped forth, the female--as far as I can +recollect--still remaining on the driver's seat with a banner in her hand. +I then left the magistrates and went to a room immediately above them, +commanding a bird's-eye view of the whole area, in which every movement +and every object was distinctly visible. In the centre were the hustings +surrounded _to all appearance_[2] by a numerous body of constables, +easily distinguished by their respectable dress, staves of office, and +hats _on_; the elevation of the hustings of course eclipsed a portion of +the space immediately beyond them, so as to prevent my seeing, and +consequently asserting positively, whether they were completely surrounded +by this chain of constables. The chain from this its main body was +continued in a double line, two or three deep, forming an avenue to Mr. +Buxton's house, by which _there seemed to be_ free and uninterrupted +access to and from the hustings. Had any interruption of their +communication occurred previous to the change, I think I must have +perceived it from the commanding position I occupied. A vast concourse of +people, in a close and compact mass, surrounded the hustings and +constables, pressing upon each other apparently with a view to be as near +the speakers as possible. They were, generally speaking, bare-headed, +probably for the purpose of giving those behind them a better view. +Between the outside of this mob and the sides of the area the space was +comparatively unoccupied; stragglers were indeed numerous, but not so as +to amount to anything like a crowd, or to create interruption to foot +passengers. Round the edges of the square more compact masses of people +were assembled, the greater part of whom appeared to be spectators. The +radical banners and caps of liberty were conspicuous in different parts +of the concentrated mob, stationed according to the order in which the +respective bands to which they belonged had entered the ground, and taken +up their positions. + +After the orators had ascended the hustings, a few minutes were taken up +in preparing for the business of the day, and then Hunt began his address. +I could distinctly hear his voice, but was too distant to distinguish his +words. He had not spoken above a minute or two before I heard a report in +the room that the cavalry were sent for; the messengers, we were told, +might be seen from a back window. I ran to that window from which I could +see the road leading to a timber yard (I believe) at no great distance, +where, as I entered the town, I had observed the Manchester Yeomanry +stationed. I saw three horsemen ride off, one towards the timber yard, the +others in the direction which I knew led to the cantonments of other +cavalry. + +I immediately returned to the front window, anxiously awaiting the result; +a slight commotion among a body of spectators, chiefly women, who occupied +a mound of raised, broken ground on the left, and to the rear, of the +orators, convinced me they saw something which excited their fears; many +jumped down, and they soon dispersed more rapidly. By this time the alarm +was quickly spreading, and I heard several voices exclaiming: "The +soldiers! the soldiers!"; another moment brought the cavalry into the +field on a gallop,[3] which they continued till the word was given for +halting them, about the middle of the space which I before noticed as +partially occupied by stragglers. + +They halted in great disorder, and so continued for the few minutes they +remained on that spot. This disorder was attributed by several persons in +the room to the undisciplined state of their horses, little accustomed to +act together, and probably frightened by the shout of the populace, which +greeted their arrival. Hunt had evidently seen their approach; his hand +had been pointed towards them, and it was clear from his gestures that he +was addressing the mob respecting their interference. His words, whatever +they were, excited a shout from those immediately about him, which was +re-echoed with fearful animation by the rest of the multitude. Ere that +had subsided, the cavalry, the loyal spectators, and the special +constables, cheered loudly in return, and a pause ensued of about a minute +or two. + +An officer and some few others then advanced rather in front of the troop, +formed, as I before said, in much disorder and with scarcely the semblance +of line, their sabres glistened in the air, and on they went, direct for +the hustings. At first, _i.e._, for a very few paces, their movement was +not rapid, and there was some show of an attempt to follow their officer +in regular succession, five or six abreast; but, as Mr. Francis Phillips +in his pamphlet observes, they soon "increased their speed," and with a +zeal and ardour which might naturally be expected from men acting with +delegated power against a foe by whom it is understood they had long been +insulted with taunts of cowardice, continued their course, seeming +individually to vie with each other which should be first. Some +stragglers, I have remarked, occupied the space in which they halted. On +the commencement of the charge, these fled in all directions; and I +presume escaped, with the exception of a woman who had been standing ten +or twelve yards in front; as the troop passed her body was left, to all +appearance lifeless; and there remained till the close of the business, +when, as it was no great distance from the house, I went towards her. Two +men were then in the act of raising her up; whether she was actually dead +or not I cannot say, but no symptoms of life were visible at the time I +last saw her.[4] + +As the cavalry approached the dense mass of people they used their utmost +efforts to escape: but so closely were they pressed in opposite directions +by the soldiers, the special constables, the position of the hustings, and +their own immense numbers, that immediate escape was impossible. The rapid +course of the troop was of course impeded when it came in contact with the +mob, but a passage was forced in less than a minute; so rapid indeed was +it that the guard of constables close to the hustings shared the fate of +the rest. The whole of this will be intelligible at once by a reference to +the annexed sketch. + +On their arrival at the hustings a scene of dreadful confusion ensued. The +orators fell or were forced off the scaffold in quick succession; +fortunately for them, the stage being rather elevated, they were in great +degree beyond the reach of the many swords which gleamed around them. Hunt +fell--or threw himself--among the constables, and was driven or dragged, +as fast as possible, down the avenue which communicated with the +magistrates' house; his associates were hurried after him in a similar +manner. By this time so much dust had arisen that no accurate account can +be given of what further took place at that particular spot. + +The square was now covered with the flying multitude; though still in +parts the banners and caps of liberty were surrounded by groups. The +Manchester Yeomanry had already taken possession of the hustings, when the +Cheshire Yeomanry entered on my left in excellent order, and formed in the +rear of the hustings as well as could be expected, considering the crowds +who were now pressing in all directions and filling up the space hitherto +partially occupied. + +The Fifteenth Dragoons appeared nearly at the same moment, and paused +rather than halted on our left, parallel to the row of houses. They then +pressed forward, crossing the avenue of constables, which opened to let +them through, and bent their course towards the Manchester Yeomanry. The +people were now in a state of utter rout and confusion, leaving the ground +strewed with hats and shoes, and hundreds were thrown down in the attempt +to escape. The cavalry were hurrying about in all directions, completing +the work of dispersion, which--to use the words given in Wheeler's +_Manchester Chronicle_, referred to by Mr. Francis Phillips--was effected +in so short a space of time as to appear as if done "by magic." + +I saw nothing that gave me an idea of resistance, except in one or two +spots where they showed some disinclination to abandon the banners; these +impulses, however, were but momentary, and banner after banner fell into +the hands of the military power.[5] The extent of their defence may +perhaps best be estimated by the gallant conduct, which I particularly +noticed, of a man on horseback, apparently a gentleman's servant. Unarmed +as far as I could perceive, he separated from the cavalry, and rode +directly into a compact body of people collected round a banner; a scuffle +ensued highly interesting; the banner rose and fell repeatedly, but +ultimately fell into his hands, and he galloped off with it in triumph. + +During the whole of this confusion, heightened at its close by the rattle +of some artillery[6] crossing the square, shrieks were heard in all +directions, and as the crowd of people dispersed the effects of the +conflict became visible. Some were seen bleeding on the ground and unable +to rise; others, less seriously injured but faint with the loss of blood, +were retiring slowly or leaning upon others for support. One special +constable, with a cut down his head, was brought to Mr. Buxton's house. I +saw several others in the passage, congratulating themselves on their +narrow escape, and showing the marks of sabre-cuts on their hats. I saw no +firearms, but distinctly heard four or five shots, towards the close of +the business, on the opposite side of the square, beyond the hustings; but +nobody could inform me by whom they were fired. The whole of this +extraordinary scene was the work of a few minutes. + +The rapid succession of so many important incidents in this short space of +time, the peculiar character of each depending so much on the variation of +a few instants in the detail, sufficiently accounts for the very +contradictory statements that have been given; added to which it should +be observed that no spectator on the ground could possibly form a just +and correct idea of what was passing. When below, I could not have +observed anything accurately beyond a few yards around me, and it was only +by ascending to the upper rooms of Mr. Buxton's house that I could form a +just and correct idea of almost every point which has since afforded so +much discussion and contention. + +The cavalry were now collected in different parts of the area; the centre, +but a few minutes before crowded to excess, was utterly deserted; groups +of radicals were still seen assembled on the outskirts, screening +themselves behind logs of timber or mingling with the spectators on the +pavement. The constables remained in a body in front of the house waiting +for the reappearance of Hunt, who (with his colleagues) was secured in a +small parlour opening into the passage to which I had now descended. I +believe the original intention was to send him to the New Bailey in a +carriage, but it was soon after decided that he should walk. When this was +made known it was received with shouts of approbation and "bring him out, +let the rebel walk," was heard from all quarters. At length he came forth, +and notwithstanding the blows he had received in running the gauntlet down +the avenue of constables, I thought I could perceive a smile of triumph +on his countenance. A person (Nadin, I believe) offered to take his arm, +but he drew himself back, and in a sort of whisper said: "No, no, that's +rather too good a thing," or words to that effect. He then left the house, +and I soon afterwards also went away. + + +[Illustration: JOSEPH NADIN DEPUTY-CONSTABLE OF MANCHESTER AT THE TIME OF +PETERLOO + +_From a Print at the Reference Library_ + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 21_] + + +I saw no symptoms of riot or disturbances before the meeting; the +impression on my mind was that the people were sullenly peaceful, and I +had an excellent opportunity of forming an opinion by suddenly coming in +contact with a large body from Ashton, who met me in Mosley Street, as I +entered the town.[7] They were walking at a moderate pace, six or seven +abreast, arm in arm, which enabled them to keep some sort of regularity in +their march. I was soon surrounded by them as I passed, and though my +horse showed a good deal of alarm, particularly at their band and flags, +they broke rank and offered no molestation whatever. + +As soon, however, as I had quitted Mr. Buxton's house at the conclusion of +the business, I found them in a very different state of feeling. I heard +repeated vows of revenge. "You took us unprepared, we were unarmed to-day, +and it is your day; but when we meet again the day shall be ours." How far +this declaration of being unarmed men may be relied upon, I cannot pretend +to say; I certainly saw nothing like arms either at or before the meeting; +their sticks were, as far as came under my observation, common +walking-sticks; that some, however, were armed I can have no doubt, as a +constable, when I was leaving Mr. Buxton's house, showed me a couple of +short skewers or daggers fixed in wooden handles, which he had taken in +the fray. + +I have heard from the most respectable authority that the cavalry were +assailed by stones during the short time they halted previous to their +charge. I do not wish to contradict positive assertions. What a person +_sees_ must be true. My evidence on that point can only be negative. I +certainly saw nothing of the sort, and yet my eyes were fixed most +steadily upon them, and I think that I must have seen any stone larger +than a pebble at the short distance at which I stood (from thirty to fifty +yards) and the commanding view I had. I indeed saw no missile weapons used +throughout the whole transaction, but as I have before stated, the dust +at the hustings soon partially obscured everything that took place near +that particular spot; but no doubt the people defended themselves to the +best of their power, as it was absolutely impossible for them to get away +and give the cavalry a clear passage till the outer part of the mob had +fallen back. No blame can be fairly attributed to the soldiers for +wounding the constables as well as the radicals, since the chief +distinguishing mark (the former being covered and the latter uncovered) +soon ceased to exist; every man for obvious reasons covering himself in +haste the moment the dispersion commenced. + +Such are the leading features of this event, to which I can speak +positively; comments and opinions I have avoided as much as possible, my +object being to give a clear and impartial account of facts, which whether +for or against the adopted conclusions of either party must speak for +themselves. + + + + +The Evidence of The Rev. Edward Stanley + + +in the Trial of an action for assault, brought by Thomas Redford against +Hugh Hornby Birley and others, members of the Manchester Yeomanry, before +Mr. Justice Holroyd and a Special Jury, at Lancaster on the 4th, 5th, 6th, +7th, 8th, and 9th of April, 1822. + + +_Second day of the Trial._ + +The Rev. EDWARD STANLEY examined by Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE (_Counsel for +the Plaintiff_). + +You, I believe, are the Rector of Alderley, in Cheshire?--I am. + +Brother to Sir Thomas Stanley?--Brother to Sir John Stanley. + +On the 16th of August, 1819, had you any business with Mr. Buxton?--I had. + +How far do you live from Manchester?--Between fifteen and sixteen miles. + +You came into Manchester on the morning; about what time?--As near twelve +o'clock as possible I entered Mosley Street. + +In your passage up Mosley Street, did you meet with any number of +people?--I did. + +Walking?--Walking. + +In what manner?--They were coming down the street, walking in a +procession, six, or seven, or eight abreast, and arm in arm. + +Were you on horseback?--I was. + +Was there any interruption to your passage?--No. Should I explain? + +Tell us the reason?--As I was going down the street, some persons on the +pavement desired me-- + +I do not wish to know what the persons on the pavement desired you to do; +I do not wish you to tell us the conversation, but simply to relate what +happened?--I passed through them. + +By their opening to give you way?--Certainly. + +Did you go on that day to Mr. Buxton's house, and what time did you get +there? I got to Mr. Buxton's house, I should think, a quarter after one. + +Did you go into a room there where the magistrates were assembled?--I did. + +How long did you remain there?--I should think about from eight to ten +minutes. + +During the time you were in the room, did Mr. Hunt arrive on the +ground?--He was called Mr. Hunt; he was in a barouche. + +And a multitude accompanying him?--A vast multitude. + +I believe there was a cheer given by the populace at the time when he did +arrive?--A tremendous shout. + +Did you remain in the room or did you go elsewhere?--I did not remain +there; I went into the room above it. + +Were there any other persons in the room besides you?--Several. + +Did you see the Manchester Yeomanry come on to the ground?--I did. + +And form in front of Mr. Buxton's house?--They formed with their left +flank a little to the right of the special constables, and a few yards to +the right of Mr. Buxton's house. + +You say to the left of the line of special constables?--Their left flank +was on the right of Mr. Buxton's house. + +You saw the line of constables; where did it extend to?--It extended from +the door of Mr. Buxton's house, apparently up to the hustings. + +Was there more than one line of constables?--There were two lines of +constables. + +What was the interval between them?--Near Mr. Buxton's house and the mob, +three or four feet. + + +[Illustration: "ORATOR" HUNT, 1773-1835 CHAIRMAN OF THE PETERLOO MEETING + +_To face page 27_] + + +Afterwards, the line was closed by the pressure of the mob, expanding +again when they came near the hustings?--According to my observation; to +the best of my judgment; such is the impression on my mind. + +Of course you saw the people collected?--Certainly. + +In a large mass?--In a very large mass. + +What was it enabled you to distinguish the special constables from the +rest?--They were superior-dressed people, had their hats on, and their +staffs were constantly appearing, and they were nearer the hustings. + +And the people round the hustings had their hats off?--My general +impression is, all, to speak accurately. + +The people on this side of the area of St. Peter's field were not so +numerous?--There were more stragglers, and no crowd. + +You saw colours and caps of liberty on the ground?--I did. + +What number of either the one or the other? Perhaps you do not distinctly +recollect?--I cannot say. + +You heard Mr. Hunt speak?--No, I could just hear his voice, but I was not +able to distinguish what he said. + +How long had that taken place before you saw the cavalry advance towards +the hustings?--From their halt, I should think three minutes. + +From the time you heard Mr. Hunt?--Not from the time I heard Mr. Hunt; he +was speaking before I arrived. + +Then from the time of the halt?--Two or three minutes. + +When you saw them advance towards the hustings, with what speed did they +go?--They were formed in an irregular mass. Those on the left advanced in +some sort of order. They went on at first, for a few paces, at no very +quick pace; but they soon increased their speed, till it became a sort of +rush or race amongst them all towards the hustings. + +Did you observe the effect that this had upon the people, whether it +caused them to disperse or not?--They could not disperse instantly. + +But on the outside of them?--On the right, in front of the hustings, they +immediately began to melt away, as it were, as far as they could at the +extreme. + +The outward edge of the meeting?--The outward edge, in front of the +hustings. + +Did you observe the cavalry when they got first among the thick part of +the meeting?--Their speed was diminished as soon as they came in contact +with the dense mob. + +Well?--But they worked their way to the hustings still, as fast, under +existing circumstances, as they could. + +From the place in which you were, I believe you had a very commanding view +of the hustings?--I looked down upon it like a map. + +I understood you, you had also been in a room below that, and looked +through there?--I had. + +Which, in your opinion, was the better place for a correct observation of +what passed after the meeting?--Decidedly, the highest room. + +Did you watch the advance of the cavalry from their place up to the +hustings?--I did. + +Did you see either sticks, or stones, or anything of the kind used against +the cavalry in their advance up to the hustings?--Certainly not. + +Did you see any resistance whatever to the cavalry, except the thickness +of the meeting?--None. + +Do I understand you to say you saw them surround the hustings, or +not?--Surround I could not say, for the other side of the hustings, of +course, was partially eclipsed by the people upon it. + +But you saw them encircle part?--Encircle part. + +Did you see what was done when they got there?--Yes. + +Will you tell us what it was that you saw done?--I saw the swords up and +down, the orators tumbled or thrown over, and the mob dispersed. + +In your judgment, what length of time elapsed between the cavalry first +setting off into the meeting and the time of their complete +dispersion?--Starting from their halt to the complete dispersion of the +meeting, I should think from three to five minutes; but I cannot speak to +a minute. + +In your judgment it took from three to five minutes? You did not observe +it by a watch?--No. + +Did you see any other troops come into the field?--I did. + +What were they?-- + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: He says he saw what?-- + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Other troops come into the field. + +When was it that you saw them come into the field?--When the mob around +the hustings were dispersing rapidly, and I think Mr. Hunt was taken off. + +What were those troops that you saw come into the ground then?--First came +in, on the left of Mr. Buxton's row of houses, the Cheshire Yeomanry, who +filed to the left. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: You mean to the left, looking from the house, +then?--From the house. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Where did the Cheshire Yeomanry take up their +position when they came on the ground?--They took up their position in the +rear of the hustings, rather in advance, I think, of some mounds of earth. + +Do you know Windmill Street?--I know no street. + +You don't know its name?--I know no name. + +You say near a rising ground?--There is a sort of little elevated bank or +ground. + +Had the multitude from that part been dispersed?--The multitude in the +rear were pretty much as they had been at first. I think they were +dispersing, but not so rapidly. + +Do you mean in the rear of the cavalry?--In the rear of the hustings. + +The Cheshire Yeomanry's position was in the rear of the hustings?--Part +near amongst these people. + +What other troops beside the Cheshire Yeomanry did you see come on to the +ground?--Soon after the Cheshire Yeomanry had come in and taken their +position, a troop of Dragoons, I think the 15th, came in under the windows +of Mr. Buxton's house. + +You say you think they were the 15th Hussars?--They were called the 15th +Dragoons; they had Waterloo medals. + +Where did they take up their position?-- + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: "Near Mr. Buxton's house," he said. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Did they continue there?--They halted or paused +for a moment or so, a little to the left of Mr. Buxton's house, a very +little to the left, almost in front, inclining to the left. + +What others did you see come on the ground, besides them and the Cheshire +Yeomanry?--At the close of the business I saw some artillery driving +through the place. + +Was there any other besides those that you saw take up any position on the +ground?--None, on the ground. + +At this time, was the whole of the multitude dispersed?--It was dispersing +most rapidly; I may say dispersed, except in partial spots. + +After leaving the hustings, to which part of the field did the Manchester +Yeomanry go?--To all parts. I think more behind the hustings, and on the +right; they did not come back to me so much. + +Do you know the Quakers' meeting-house?--I have heard where it is since; +then I did not know. + +Was it that way that they went?--If you could point out, in a plan, the +Quakers' meeting-house, I could tell you if they went that road. + +There is the Quakers' meeting-house, you will see written on the +plan?--Some went that way. + +Some of the people, too, dispersed in that direction, did they?--The +people dispersed in every direction. + +I am not sure whether I asked you before, whether from your situation in +this window, if any stones, or brickbats, or sticks, had been raised +against the cavalry, on their way to the hustings, you must have seen +it?--I think I must have seen it. + + +Cross-examined by Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: + +Will you venture to swear, Mr. Stanley, that no stones nor brickbats would +be thrown during the advance of the cavalry towards the hustings, without +your perceiving it?--I can only venture to say that I saw none. + +I believe you have favoured the public with an account of this +transaction?--No, I have not. + +You printed or wrote something?--It was in circulation among my friends. I +wrote something which was never published. + +There was a document, written by you, circulated among your +friends?--Among my friends. + +Before that time, had you seen yourself and read any publication, either +in manuscript or print, on this subject?--I had read the reports in some +papers, naturally, after that time, and I might have seen a pamphlet +printed at Manchester. + +Then you had seen several accounts which had been given to the world +before you wrote?--Yes, I saw the reports of the papers immediately after +the meeting. + +Whose account did you see, besides the reports in the paper?--A Mr. +Phillips's. + +You, it seemed, entertained a different view of the transactions that had +taken place upon this day from those which had been given to the world +before that time?--I do not know; I should say a different view from some, +perhaps, and coinciding with the views of others. + +Coinciding with the views of some, and differing from the views of +others?--Respecting stones. + +No matter what. You are a magistrate, I understand?--I am not. + +Of neither Cheshire nor Lancashire?--No. + +I beg your pardon. You, however, were in the magistrates' room, I think +you said, at Mr. Buxton's?--I was. + +Of course you had an acquaintance with the gentlemen who were there +assembled, as acting magistrates of the committee for the counties of +Chester and Lancaster?--With two or three I had. + +Probably upon terms of intimacy with one of them?--Certainly. + +Was that gentleman there at that time?--He was. + +Did it occur to your mind at the time that the cavalry were sent for +(because you went back to a window, and saw the messenger crossing the +field, for the purpose of bringing them to the place, and were told or +heard there was a rumour in the room above, that the cavalry had been +sent for) did it occur (attend to my question) to you, at the time, from +the observations which you had made on the subject, that that step was +improper or premature?--I don't think it occurred to me either one way or +the other. + +Am I to understand from that then that you exercised no judgment upon the +subject at that time?--I certainly did exercise some judgment, some +opinion on it, at that time. + +Having exercised some judgment upon the subject, I ask you whether, in +your judgment, such as you exercised upon that point, the step was either +improper or premature?--I saw no necessity for it. + +Then you deemed it premature?--I saw no necessity for it. + +It struck you then as an unnecessary act?--Certainly. + +Then you would go down, of course, immediately and speak to your friend +upon the subject?--No. + +Nor ever expressed to that friend or to any other, at the time, your +opinion with respect to the impropriety of the step?--I had no other +friend to speak to. + +Did you speak to him?--I did not go down into the room again. + +Probably you might, being a gentleman of considerable acquaintance, meet +with some friend on going home, and might ride home with some gentleman, +at least part of the road?--Part of the road I did. + +Mr Markland, I presume?--I overtook Mr. Markland. + +Did you express any opinion to Mr. Markland upon these +proceedings?--Probably I did; but I have not the most distant +recollection. + +I ask you, upon your oath, Mr. Stanley, if you did not express to him your +entire concurrence in, and approbation of, the measures adopted by the +magistrates?--I answer, upon my oath, that I do not recollect having said +any such thing. + +Can you tell me whether you expressed any disapprobation of the measures +which it had been deemed necessary to adopt?--I have no recollection +whatever of the conversation. + +Then you mean to represent to us now, that your feelings upon the subject +were so indifferent, that you cannot tell now, whether you approved or +disapproved of these steps at the time?--I have not the most distant +recollection of any conversation I had with Mr. Markland. + +That is not an answer to my question. I ask you whether you mean to state +that at this time, you don't remember whether you entertained feelings of +approbation or disapprobation of those steps?--I thought it was a dreadful +occurrence; but I hoped that there were some grounds for it. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: You are speaking of what you thought?--It was in +answer to the question. + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: I am speaking of what you thought then. As I +understand you, you cannot recall to your recollection the impression +under which you laboured at the time you travelled home with Mr. +Markland?--I thought it a dreadful occurrence, but I hoped there were +grounds for it. + +Did you mention that to Mr. Markland?--I cannot recollect. + +It is very important that I should endeavour to extract from you, Mr. +Stanley, without meaning the slightest disrespect to you, every fact +within your knowledge on the subject; you say that after the meeting had +been dispersed, the first cavalry which appeared on the ground was the +Cheshire Yeomanry?--Not after the meeting had dispersed, but whilst in +progress to dispersion. + +Do you mean to state now, to the best of your recollection, that the +Cheshire Yeomanry were the first cavalry advancing on the ground after +that?--It depends on what you call the ground; the Cheshire Yeomanry were +the first, after the Manchester cavalry, that advanced at the left. + +Tell me, according to the best of your recollection, which of these troops +came first upon the ground?--The Cheshire Yeomanry; but you will observe +that, at this time, the disposition of the hustings occupied a good deal +of my attention, and I did not expect the others. + +The Cheshire Yeomanry came over broken and uneven ground?--I cannot tell. + +I observe that you use the word "apparently" twice, in answer to two +questions which were put to you, which were a repetition of the same +question--whether the two lines of constables surrounded the hustings or +not; I think you said they "apparently" did?--Apparently they did. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Surround the hustings?--Apparently. + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: Do you mean to state, then, that in your judgment +the avenue which was formed by the two lines of constables extended from +the house to the hustings?--At that time the impression on my mind was, +and it now is, that it certainly did. + +But of course you won't swear that it did?--I cannot swear; I can only +speak to the impression on my mind. + +In the same way that you swear to the existence of brickbats and +stones?--To the non-existence. + +I think you say you saw Hunt come upon the ground?--I saw the barouche. + +You saw the ladies and gentlemen both. Did you see any female?--I saw a +female. + +What was her use?--I have no conception of that. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Of what?-- + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: I asked whether she was for use or show. + +You did not know any of the parties inside?--I had not the most distant +knowledge of them. + +You had heard of Carlile?--I heard of him in London. + +You have heard since he was in Manchester that day?--I have heard it +to-day, in the course of another examination. I never heard it before. + +Hunt, when he saw the cavalry coming, I think, intimated his +knowledge--his cognisance of the fact--by desiring them to give three +cheers?--I could not hear. + +There was some cheering given?--There was a very loud cheer. + +From the hustings?--From all the mob. + +You say when he was addressing the mob, you did not hear his words, "but I +think, whatever his words were, they excited a shout from those +immediately about him, which was re-echoed with fearful animation by the +rest of the multitude"?--Certainly, that is the impression on my mind; +those were my own words. + +It was tremendous--the shout?--It was not so tremendous as the shout with +which Hunt was received on the ground; the first was the loudest shout. + +And the most appalling?--The first, when Hunt was received on the ground; +I never heard so loud a shout. + +"Terrific," was your word?--I should say terrific. + +You say that the people who were immediately contiguous to the hustings +heard what Hunt said?--I cannot say. + +You inferred that from their shouting?--Certainly. + +Then that shout was re-echoed by the mob at a distance?--I conceived so. + +What proportion, do you think, of the mass of the people, with their eyes +up, and mouths open, looking at that man during the time, could hear one +word he said?--I should think no one beyond ten yards from the hustings, +in the bustle of such a day--that is guess. + +I daresay it is a good guess, too; how do you think they would carry the +resolutions at the outside, at the right flank, the left flank, and beyond +the ten yards, upon the propositions made by this orator?--I have no +opinion to give about that. + +It certainly is a difficult point. It appeared to you that Hunt, as far as +his voice could reach, had a pretty absolute control over his friends; +they shouted as he spoke; it appeared that he was +commander-in-chief?--The thing never occurred to me; I cannot speak +positively. + +Have not you an opinion that he was head and leader of the party?--My +opinion certainly is, that he was. + +And now, I will ask you this question, as a clergyman, and as a man of +character, which I believe you to be--I ask you, upon your oath, whether, +in your judgment, the public tranquillity and the peace of Manchester were +not endangered by a mob of that description, composed in that manner, and +having such a man as Hunt at its head--Hunt and Carlile, for +instance?--Hunt and Carlile are dangerous people, and any mob under their +control must be dangerous. + +Re-examined by Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: + +Do you know, Mr. Stanley, whether this meeting was under the command of +either Hunt or Carlile?--No. + +When you say there was a shout given on the Manchester Yeomanry coming +into the field, was there any other shout besides that given by the +multitude?--There was. + +Whose shout was that?--The Manchester Yeomanry, the special constables, +and the people round the pavement in front of our house. + +May I ask you whether you were terrified by those shouts?--Personally, +certainly not. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Explain what you mean by that?--I myself was not +alarmed about them. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: And whether it did not create terror and +alarm?--Not to me individually, certainly not. + +You have said that you presented a description of what you saw at the +meeting, to some of your friends?--I did. + +How soon was that written after the meeting?--I can scarcely say; I should +think perhaps two months, but I cannot speak accurately. It was when the +impression was clear on my mind. + +Clear and fresh in your recollection. Will you have the goodness to tell +me whether you heard or saw any person read the Riot Act?--I neither heard +it read nor saw it read. + +Mr. SERJEANT HULLOCK: If it was read you did not hear it?--I did not hear +it. + +If it should turn out to have been read, and read loudly, there might have +been something else done--but that is conclusion--that is reason. + +Mr. EVANS: Your Lordship has on your note that McKennell said that he did +not[8] hear the Riot Act read. + +Mr. SERJEANT CROSS: He said so. + +Mr. JUSTICE HOLROYD: Yes, I have. + +Mr. SERJEANT BLACKBURNE: Then that is my case, my Lord. + + +[Illustration: Plan of Peterloo. (_F. A. B._) + +Compiled from a number of Contemporary Plans, and showing (in dotted +outline) the position of modern blocks of buildings. + +_By permission of Mr. H. Guppy._] + + + + +Sir William Jolliffe + +_afterwards_ + +LORD HYLTON + + +William George Hylton Jolliffe (1800-1876), the first Baron Hylton, was +the son of the Rev. W. J. Jolliffe. At the date of Peterloo he was not +quite nineteen years of age, and was serving as a Lieutenant in the 15th +Hussars, then quartered at the Cavalry Barracks at Manchester. He retired +from the Hussars with the rank of Captain. He was created a Baronet in +1821, and sat as member for Petersfield for about thirty years, acting for +a short time as Under Secretary for Home Affairs, and afterwards as +Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. He was exceedingly popular as a +Conservative Whip, and when he was raised to the Peerage in 1866, he took +the title of Baron Hylton from the family's connection with the Hyltons of +Hylton Castle. + +The letter which follows appeared in Dean Pellew's _Life of Lord +Sidmouth_, published in 1847. It will be seen that it is addressed to T. +G. B. Estcourt, Esq.; presumably he obtained the information for Dean +Pellew. The letter is approved and annotated by "E. Smyth, Esq., of +Norwich, who commanded a troop of the Cheshire Yeomanry at Peterloo." +Unfortunately, the Notes to the letter are somewhat confusing: some are +signed by Captain Smyth, others are not signed, and it is not easy to +determine their authorship. Moreover, Captain Smyth's contributions are +not on a level with the letter itself. It has therefore been thought +better to omit the Notes altogether, and allow Lieut. Jolliffe's very +clear and well-balanced report to speak for itself. A few explanatory +words have been inserted in square brackets. + +The Rev. Edward Stanley, in his Evidence, given above, mentioned the fact +that the Hussars who rode at Peterloo were wearing their Waterloo medals. +As a matter of fact, the 15th (the King's) Hussars, whose motto is +"Merebimur," have not only "Waterloo," but also the Peninsula, Vittoria, +Afghanistan and a number of other names inscribed on their colours. The +uniform is blue, with a Busby bag and scarlet plume. Presumably the plume +shown in our photograph came from the helmet of one of the Hussars. It +seems clear from the evidence which was given before the Relief Committee, +after Peterloo, that there was not the same feeling of resentment against +the Hussars as against the local Yeomanry; in fact, it was more than once +asserted that troopers of the Hussars actually restrained the Manchester +Yeomanry from excessive violence. + + * * * * * + +I wrote to the present Lord Hylton to ask if he could lend a portrait of +his Grandfather for reproduction here. He replied that he could not do so, +but added: "As a matter of fact, a full-length portrait (by Sir Francis +Grant, P.R.A., in my possession) has been engraved, and a copy of this +engraving is, I should think, not difficult to procure." I have not been +able to find it. It is not included in the British Museum Series. + + + + +The Charge of the 15th Hussars at Peterloo + +_as described by_ + +SIR WILLIAM G. H. JOLLIFFE, BART., M.P. (who rode in the charge as a +Lieutenant of Hussars) in a letter which appears in Dean Pellew's _Life of +Lord Sidmouth_, Vol. III., p. 253 _et seq._ + +9, ST. JAMES'S PLACE, + +_April 11th, 1845_. + +MY DEAR SIR, + +Twenty-five years have passed since the collision unfortunately occurred +between the population of Manchester and its neighbourhood and the +military stationed in that town, on the sixteenth of August, 1819. + +I was at that time a Lieutenant in the 15th King's Hussars, which Regiment +had been quartered in Manchester Cavalry Barracks about six weeks. This +was my first acquaintance with a large manufacturing population. I had +little knowledge of the condition of that population, whether or no a +great degree of distress was then prevalent, or whether or no the distrust +and bad feeling which appeared to exist between employers and employed, +was wholly or in part caused by the agitation of political questions. I +will not, therefore, enter into any speculation on these points, but I +will endeavour to relate the facts which fell under my own observations, +although acting, as of course I was, under the command of others, and in a +subordinate situation. The military force stationed in Manchester +consisted of six troops of the 15th Hussars, under the command of Colonel +Dalrymple; one troop of Horse Artillery with two guns, under Major +Dyneley; and nearly the whole of the 31st Regiment, under Colonel Guy +L'Estrange (who commanded the whole as senior officer). [Sir John Byng was +then at Pontefract.] Some companies of the 88th Regiment and [six troops +of] the Cheshire Yeomanry had also been brought into the town in +anticipation of disturbances which might result from the expected meeting; +and these latter had only arrived on the morning of the sixteenth, or a +few hours previously; and, lastly, there was a troop of Manchester +Yeomanry Cavalry, consisting of about forty members, who, from the manner +in which they were made use of (to say the least) greatly aggravated the +disasters of the day. Their ranks were filled chiefly by wealthy master +manufacturers; and without the knowledge possessed by a (strictly +speaking) military body, they were placed, most unwisely, as it appeared, +under the immediate command and order of the civil authorities. + +Our Regiment paraded in field-service order at about 8.30 or it might be 9 +o'clock, a.m. Two squadrons of it were marched into the town about ten +o'clock. They were formed up and dismounted in a wide street, the name of +which I forget,[9] to the North of St. Peter's field (the place appointed +for the meeting), and at the distance of nearly a quarter of a mile from +it. + +The Cheshire Yeomanry were formed, on our left, in the same street. One +troop of our Regiment was attached to the artillery, which took up a +position between the Cavalry Barracks and the town; and one troop remained +in charge of the Barracks. + +The two squadrons with which I was stationed must have remained dismounted +nearly two hours. During the greater portion of that period a solid mass +of people continued moving along a street about a hundred yards to our +front on the way to the place of meeting. Other officers as well as myself +occasionally rode to the front (to the end of a street) to see them pass. +They marched at a brisk pace in ranks well closed up, five or six bands of +music being interspersed, and there appeared to be but few women with +them. Mr. Hunt, with two or three other men, and I think two women dressed +in light blue and white, were in an open carriage drawn by the people. +This carriage was adorned with blue and white flags; and the day was fine +and hot. As soon as the great bulk of the procession had passed, we were +ordered to stand to our horses. In a very short time afterwards, the four +troops of the 15th mounted, and at once moved off by the right, at a trot +which was increased to a canter. Someone who had been sent from the place +of meeting to bring us led the way through a number of narrow streets and +by a circuitous route to (what I will call) the South-west[10] corner of +St. Peter's field. We advanced along the South[11] side of this space of +ground without a halt or pause even: the words "Front!" and "Forward!" +were given, and the trumpet sounded the charge at the very moment the +threes wheeled up. When fronted, our line extended quite across the +ground, which in all parts was so filled with people that their hats +seemed to touch. + +It was then for the first time that I saw the Manchester troop of +Yeomanry; they were scattered singly or in small groups over the greater +part of the field, literally hemmed up and hedged into the mob so that +they were powerless either to make an impression or to escape; in fact, +they were in the power of those whom they were designed to overawe, and it +required only a glance to discover their helpless position, and the +necessity of our being brought to their rescue. As I was at the time +informed, this hopeless state of things happened thus: A platform had been +erected near the centre of the field, from which Mr. Hunt and others were +to address the multitude, and the magistrates, having ordered a strong +body of constables to arrest the speakers, unfortunately imagined that +they should support the peace officers by bringing up the troop of +Yeomanry at a walk. The result of this movement, instead of that which the +magistrates desired, was unexpectedly to place this small body of horsemen +(so introduced into a dense mob) entirely at the mercy of the people by +whom they were, on all sides, pressed upon and surrounded. + +The charge of the Hussars, to which I have just alluded, swept this +mingled mass of human beings before it; people, yeomen, and constables, +in their confused attempts to escape, ran one over the other; so that by +the time we had arrived at the end of the field the fugitives were +literally piled up to a considerable elevation above the level of the +ground. (I may here, by the way, state that this field, as it is called, +was merely an open space of ground, surrounded by buildings, and itself, I +rather think, in course of being built upon.). + +The Hussars drove the people forward with the flats of their swords, but +sometimes, as is almost inevitably the case when men are placed in such +situations, the edge was used, both by the Hussars, and, as I have heard, +by the yeomen also; but of this last part I was not cognizant, and +believing though I do that nine out of ten of the sabre-wounds were caused +by the Hussars, I must still consider that it redounds to the humane +forbearance of the men of the 15th that more wounds were not received, +when the vast numbers are taken into consideration with whom they were +brought into hostile collision; beyond all doubt, however, the far greater +amount of injuries were from the pressure of the routed multitude. The +Hussars on the left pursued down the various streets which led from the +place; those on the right met with something more of resistance. + +The mob had taken possession of various buildings on that side, +particularly of a Quakers' chapel and burial ground enclosed with a wall. +This they occupied for some little time, and in attempting to displace +them, some of the men and horses were struck with stones and brickbats. I +was on the left, and as soon as I had passed completely over the ground +and found myself in the street on the other side, I turned back, and then, +seeing a sort of fight still going on on the right, I went in that +direction. At the very moment I reached the Quakers' meeting-house, I saw +a farrier of the 15th ride at a small door in the outer wall, and to my +surprise his horse struck it with such force that it flew open. Two or +three Hussars then rode in, and the place was immediately in their +possession. I then turned towards the elevated platform, which still +remained in the centre of the field with persons upon it; a few straggling +Hussars and yeomen, together with a number of men having the appearance of +peace-officers were congregating about it. On my way thither I met the +Commanding-officer of my Regiment, who directed me to find a Trumpeter, in +order that he might sound the "rally" or "retreat." This sent me again +down the street I had first been in (after the pursuing men of my troop); +but I had not ridden above a hundred yards before I found a Trumpeter, and +returned with him to the Colonel. The field and the adjacent streets now +presented an extraordinary sight: the ground was quite covered with hats, +shoes, musical instruments, and other things. Here and there lay the +unfortunates who were too much injured to move away, and this sight was +rendered the more distressing by observing some women among the sufferers. + +Standing near the corner of the street where I had been sent in search of +a Trumpeter, a brother officer called my attention to a pistol being fired +from a window. I saw it fired twice, and I believe it had been fired once +before I observed it. Some of the 31st Regiment just now arriving on the +ground were ordered to take possession of this house, but I do not know if +this was carried into effect. + +I next went towards a private of the Regiment whose horse had fallen over +a piece of timber nearly in the middle of the square, and who was most +seriously injured. There were many of these pieces of timber (or +timber-trees) lying upon the ground, and as these could not be +distinguished when the mob covered them, they had caused bad falls to one +officer's horse and to many of the troopers'. While I was attending to the +wounded soldier, the artillery troop with the troop of Hussars attached to +it, arrived on the ground from the same direction by which we had entered +the field; these were quickly followed by the Cheshire Yeomanry. The 31st +Regiment came in another direction, and the whole remained formed up till +our squadrons had fallen in again. + +Carriages were brought to convey the wounded to the Manchester Infirmary, +and the troop of Hussars who came up with the guns was marched off to +escort to the gaol a number of persons who had been arrested, and among +these Mr. Hunt. For some time the town was patrolled by the troops, the +streets being nearly empty, and the shops for the most part closed. We +then returned to the Barracks. I should not omit to mention that, before +the men were dismissed, the arms were minutely examined; and that no +carbine or pistol was found to have been fired, and only one pistol to +have been loaded. + +About 8 p.m. one squadron of the 15th Hussars (two troops) was ordered on +duty to form part of a strong night picket, the other part of which +consisted of two companies of the 88th Regiment. This picket was stationed +at a place called the New Cross, at the end of Oldham Street. As soon as +it had taken up its position, a mob assembled about it, which increased as +the darkness came on; stones were thrown at the soldiers, and the Hussars +many times cleared the ground by driving the mob up the streets leading +from the New Cross. But these attempts to get rid of the annoyance were +only successful for the moment, for the people got through the houses or +narrow passages from one street into another, and the troops were again +attacked, and many men and horses struck with stones. This lasted nearly +an hour and a half, and the soldiers being more and more pressed upon, a +town magistrate, who was with the picket, read the Riot Act, and the +officer in command ordered the 88th to fire (which they did by platoon +firing) down three of the streets. The firing lasted only a few minutes; +perhaps not more than thirty shots were fired; but these had a magical +effect; the mob ran away and dispersed forthwith, leaving three or four +persons on the ground with gunshot wounds. At 4 a.m. the picket squadron +was relieved by another squadron of the Regiment. With this latter +squadron I was on duty, and after we had patrolled the town for two hours, +the officer in command sent me to the magistrates (who had remained +assembled during the night) to report to them that the town was perfectly +quiet, and to request their sanction to the return of the military to +their quarters. + +On the afternoon of the 17th I visited, in company with some military +medical officers, the Infirmary. I saw there from twelve to twenty cases +of sabre-wounds, and among these two women who appeared not likely to +recover. One man was in a dying state from a gunshot wound in the head; +another had had his leg amputated; both these casualties arose from the +firing of the 88th the night before. Two or three were reputed dead; one +of them a constable, killed on St. Peter's field, but I saw none of the +bodies. + +As shortly as I could I have now related what fell under my own +observation during these twenty-four hours ... I trust that I have, in +some degree, complied with your wishes. + +WILLIAM G. HYLTON JOLLIFFE. + +_To_ Thomas Grimston Bucknall Estcourt, Esq., M.P. + + + + +[Illustration: JOHN BENJAMIN SMITH 1794-1879 + +_By permission of Lady Durning Lawrence_ + +_Photo by Briggs_ + +_To face page 59_] + + +John Benjamin Smith + +_First Chairman of the Anti-Corn Law League_. + + +John Benjamin Smith (1794-1879), whose account of Peterloo follows, was +better known as a strenuous advocate of Free Trade; even in this capacity, +however, a breakdown of health some years before the Repeal of the Corn +Laws, robbed him of much of the credit which was due to him for the +important spade-work that he had done. He was the first Treasurer of the +Anti-Corn Law Association, and when that developed into the Anti-Corn Law +League, he became its first Chairman. He contested several elections on +Free Trade principles, and used himself to tell how he had converted +Cobden to "total repeal." He sat as member, first for the Stirling Burghs, +and afterwards, during more than twenty years, for Stockport. His +correspondence with John Bright has recently been placed in the Manchester +Reference Library. During the American War he strongly espoused the cause +of the North, and he was one of those who urged the Government to +encourage the growth of cotton in India. + +Mr. Smith was a Trustee of Owens College under the Founder's will; and he +subscribed liberally towards its extension. His name is perpetuated in the +"Smith" Professorship of English Literature, which was endowed in memory +of him by his two daughters and his son-in-law. A short memoir of him, +which appeared in Alderman Thompson's _History of Owens College_, has been +reprinted and published separately. (Manchester, J. E. Cornish, 1887.) + +At the date of Peterloo he was only twenty-five years of age, but he had +already shown great promise as a business man. Entering the office of his +uncle, a Manchester merchant, at the early age of fourteen, he was made +responsible for the whole correspondence of the firm five years later; and +before he was twenty he had negotiated some very profitable purchases of +cotton at the sales of the East India Company. + +The account of Peterloo which follows is an extract from his +"Reminiscences," which were written towards the close of his life at the +earnest request of his family. The manuscript of these is now at the +Manchester Reference Library, as is also a typed and bound copy presented +by his daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. Among his other manuscripts (also +at the Manchester Reference Library) is a shorter account of Peterloo, +apparently written immediately after the event. The statement made +recently that Mr. J. B. Smith was the author of the well-known _Impartial +Narrative of the Melancholy Occurrences at Manchester_ seems to be due to +an error: apparently the _Impartial Narrative_ (which seems to have been +written by another hand) has been confused with Mr. Smith's shorter and +earlier account. + +We have already pointed out that Mr. Smith's narrative, which is not so +detailed as those of Stanley and Jolliffe in its description of the charge +of the troops, is specially valuable for the account it gives of the +circumstances immediately preceding and following the catastrophe, and its +estimate of the character of the crowd. In these details it is strikingly +corroborative of Bamford's story, as told in his _Passages in the Life of +a Radical_, and of the information given by Mr. John Edward Taylor, +who--under the pseudonym of "An Observer"--edited the contemporary tracts +entitled _The Peterloo Massacre_. + + * * * * * + +The portrait of Mr. Smith which appears here is from a photograph kindly +lent by his daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. + + + + +_AN EXTRACT FROM THE_ + +"Reminiscences" of John Benjamin Smith + +_Copied from the original manuscript then in the possession of his +daughter, Lady Durning Lawrence. (August 1913.)_ + + +... The people, disappointed in their expectations that prosperity and +plenty would follow the return of peace, and having no faith in a +legislature which as soon as the war terminated inflicted upon them a Corn +Law to deprive them of cheap corn, demanded a better representation in +Parliament. Stimulated by the writings of Cobbett, associations were +formed in all the manufacturing districts to obtain a reform in +Parliament. Lancashire took the lead in this movement. Clubs were +established in 1816 in all the manufacturing towns and villages. At the +small town of Middleton, near Manchester, a Club was formed in which +Bamford, the weaver-poet, took a leading part. They were joined by many +honest and intelligent men from all parts of the district, among whom was +John Knight, a small manufacturer. A meeting of delegates was held on the +first of January, 1817, at which it was decided that the reforms required +could only be accomplished by the establishment of annual parliaments and +universal suffrage. + +The establishment of these clubs alarmed the Government, who saw in them +nothing but an intention to overturn the institutions of the country, and +to revive in this country the enormities of the French Revolution. Spies +and Informers were employed by the Government, and John Knight and +thirty-seven others who had legally assembled to discuss the reforms which +they deemed necessary to obtain a repeal of the Corn Laws and good +government, were arrested on the information of spies, and sent for trial +to Lancaster, but on their trial before Mr. Baron Wood, were all found not +guilty by the Jury. + +The Sidmouth Government suspended the Habeas Corpus Act so that they could +arrest and imprison any person as long as they pleased. The Tories, +following the example of the Radicals, established Associations for the +protection of the Constitution. + +In January, 1818, however, it was announced that the Act for the +suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act would be repealed. No sooner were the +people relieved from the danger of being sent to prison for being present +at a meeting to petition Parliament for reform, as great numbers had been +in Lancashire imprisoned from March, 1817 until January, 1818, and then +discharged without being informed what charges were made against +them--than the Reform Associations were revived. A fresh campaign was +rigorously commenced early in 1819. + +Henry Hunt (commonly called Orator Hunt) had come forward as the champion +of the people's rights. On the 25th of January, he made a public entry +into Manchester from Stockport, accompanied by large crowds with flags and +banners. The meeting was enthusiastic but very peaceable. Meetings were +held in all the surrounding towns and villages to appoint district +delegates to make arrangements for a great meeting to be held in +Manchester. This memorable meeting was held on the 16th of August, 1819, +on a large vacant plot of land called St. Peter's field, adjoining St. +Peter's Street, and in sight of St. Peter's Church. The actors in the +bloody tragedy of that day were called "The Heroes of Peterloo," in +contrast with the brave heroes of Waterloo. + +This meeting was called to petition Parliament for a Reform of Parliament +and the Repeal of the Corn Laws, and it is a curious coincidence that on +the very spot where the largest public meeting was ever held to petition +Parliament for the Repeal of the Corn Laws, in the dispersion of which by +military force six hundred persons were killed and wounded there now +stands the Free Trade Hall, erected twenty years afterwards on Peterloo, +for the peaceful and noble object of obtaining bread for the people by the +repeal of the wicked laws by which it was prohibited. + +I had no intention of going to this meeting, but my Aunt called at the +Counting House and asked me to accompany her to Mrs. Orton's, Mount +Street, St. Peter's field, to see the great meeting--a house overlooking +the whole space, and next but one to where the Magistrates were assembled. +We reached there about half-past eleven o'clock, and on our way saw large +bodies of men and women with bands playing and flags and banners bearing +devices: "No Corn Laws," "Reform," etc. There were crowds of people in all +directions, full of good humour, laughing and shouting and making fun. I +always wore a white hat in summer, and I found that Mr. Hunt also wore a +white hat, and it became the symbol of radicalism, and may have been the +cause of the politeness shown to us by the crowd. + +It seemed to be a gala day with the country people who were mostly dressed +in their best and brought with them their wives, and when I saw boys and +girls taking their father's hand in the procession, I observed to my Aunt: +"These are the guarantees of their peaceable intentions--we need have no +fears," and so we passed on to Mrs. Orton's. When we arrived there we saw +great crowds which were constantly increased by the arrival of successive +country processions until it was estimated that the meeting amounted to +60,000 people. There was a double row of constables formed from Mr. +Buxton's (where the magistrates had taken their station) to the hustings. + +My Father joined us soon after our arrival at Mrs. Orton's. + +At length Hunt made his appearance in an open barouche drawn by two +horses, and a woman dressed in white sitting on the box. On their reaching +the hustings which were prepared for the orator, he was received with +enthusiastic applause; the waving of hats and flags; the blowing of +trumpets; and the playing of music. Hunt stepped on to the hustings, and +was again cheered by the vast assemblage. He began to address them, and I +could distinctly see his motions through the glass I held in my hand, and +I could hear his voice, but could not understand what he said. He paused, +and the people cheered him. + +About this time there was an alarm among the women and children near the +place where I stood, and I could also see a part of the crowd in motion +towards the Deansgate side, but I thought it a false alarm, as many +returned again and joined in the huzzas of the crowd. A second alarm +arose, and I heard the sound of a horn, and immediately the Manchester +Yeomanry appeared, coming from Peter Street, headed by Hugh Birley, the +same man who, in 1815, as Boroughreeve of Manchester, presided at the +public meeting assembled to petition Parliament for the Repeal of the Corn +Laws. They galloped up to the house where the Magistrates were assembled, +halted, and drew up in line. After some hesitation, from what cause I do +not know, I heard the order to form three deep, and then the order to +march. The Trumpeter led the way and galloped towards the hustings, +followed by the yeomanry. + +Whilst this was passing, my attention was called to another movement +coming from the opposite side of the meeting. A troop of soldiers, the +15th Hussars, turned round the corner of the house where we stood and +galloped forwards towards the crowd. They were succeeded by the Cheshire +Yeomanry, and lastly by two pieces of artillery. On the arrival of the +soldiers, the special constables, the magistrates, and the soldiers set +up loud shouts. This was responded to by the crowd with waving of hats. +After this the soldiers galloped amongst the people creating frightful +alarm and disorder. The people ran helter-skelter in every direction. + +It was a hot, dusty day; clouds of dust arose which obscured the view. +When it had subsided a startling scene was presented. Numbers of men, +women, and children were lying on the ground who had been knocked down and +run over by the soldiers. I noticed one woman lying face downwards, +apparently lifeless. A man went up to her and lifted one of her legs; it +fell as if she were lifeless; another man lifted both her legs and let +them fall. I saw her some time after carried off by the legs and arms as +if she were dead. + +My attention was then directed to a number of constables bringing from the +hustings the famous Hunt wearing a white hat, and with him another man, +also wearing a white hat, who was said to be Johnson. The prisoners were +treated in a scandalous manner; many of the constables hissed and beat +them as they passed. When they reached the Magistrates' house he was +surrounded by constables, some pulling him by the collar, others by the +coat. A dastardly attack was made upon him by General Clay, who with a +large stick struck him over the head with both hands as he was +ascending the steps to the Magistrates' house. The blow knocked in his hat +and packed it over his face. He then turned round as if ashamed of himself +and became a quiet spectator. The ground by this time was cleared, and +nothing was to be seen but soldiers and constables. + + +[Illustration: THE HUNT MEMORIAL IN THE VESTIBULE OF THE MANCHESTER REFORM +CLUB + +_Bronze Relief by John Cassidy, R.C.A._ + +_To face page 69_] + + +The Rev. Mr. Hay (the Chairman to the Magistrates) then stood on the steps +of Mr. Buxton's house and addressed the constables. I could not hear what +he said, but he was cheered when he concluded. He then returned into the +house, but came out again soon afterwards with Mr. Marriott, the +Magistrate, and Hunt in the custody of Nadin, Chief Constable, and with +Johnson in the custody of another constable. When Hunt made his +appearance, he was assailed with groans and hisses by the soldiers and +constables. Hunt took off his hat and bowed to them, which appeared to +calm them while they marched towards Deansgate on their way to the New +Bailey prison, escorted by the cavalry. On quitting the windows from +whence we had witnessed so many painful scenes, we descended and found two +special constables who had been brought into the house. One presented a +shocking sight--the face was all over blood from a sword-cut on his head, +and his shoulder was put out. The other was bloody from being rode over +and kicked on the back of his head. + +When the particulars of this bloody tragedy became known, strong feelings +of indignation were expressed all over the country. The Manchester +magistrates, alarmed at the tone of public opinion in London, had a +meeting hastily convened on the 19th of August at the Police Office, which +was adjourned to the Star Inn, where resolutions were passed thanking the +magistrates and the soldiers. I happened by accident to be present at the +meeting. A young man with whom I was acquainted, a clerk in the office of +the Clerk to the Magistrates, happening to meet me in the street on his +way to the meeting, took me by the arm and said: "Come with me." I asked +where he was going, and when I learned, declined to go. He replied: +"Nonsense, you will hear what is going on," and so I somewhat reluctantly +went with him to the Star Inn. On our arrival we found the room pretty +full and I took a seat. The Chairman, Mr. Francis Phillips, rose and said: +"If there be any persons present who do not approve of the objects of this +meeting they are requested to withdraw." I thought he looked at me, and +felt a little uncomfortable. He sat down again and rose to repeat his +request. I thought that as I should know better what the object of the +meeting was after I had heard it explained, I would sit still, and so I +remained to the end. After the meeting I told some of my Reform friends +how I came to be present at the meeting, and they wished me to write out +an account of the proceedings. I did so, and with a few alterations and +the omission of names it was inserted in _Cowdroy's Gazette_. This +statement created great alarm among those who got up the meeting to thank +the magistrates, and they denounced it as a false statement, but another +letter to _Cowdroy's Gazette_ affirmed the truth of the account of the +meeting to thank the magistrates, and threatened to make public the names +of the speakers if its correctness was again called in question. + + +[Illustration: THE PETERLOO MEDAL + +Note the women and children, and the cap of Liberty held aloft in the +centre + +_To face page 71_] + + +The dispersion of a legally convened meeting by military force aroused a +general indignation, and the smuggled passing of thanks to the magistrates +so dishonestly sent forth occasioned an expression of public feeling and +opinion such as had never been manifested in Manchester before. A +"Declaration and Protest" against the Star Inn resolutions was immediately +issued, stating that "We are fully satisfied by personal observation on +undoubted information that the meeting was _perfectly peaceable_; that no +seditious or intemperate harangues were made there; that the Riot Act, _if +read at all_, was read _privately, or without the knowledge of a great +body of the meeting_, and we feel it our bounden duty to protest against +and to express our utter disapprobation of the unexpected and unnecessary +violence by which the assembly was dispersed. + +"We further declare that the meeting convened at the Police Office on the +19th of August for the purpose of thanking the magistrates, municipal +officers, soldiers, etc., was strictly and exclusively _private_, and in +order that the privacy might be more completely ensured was adjourned to +the Star Inn. It is a matter of notoriety that no expression of dissent +from the main object of the meeting was there permitted. We therefore deny +that it had any claim to the title of a 'numerous and highly respectable +meeting of the inhabitants of Manchester and Salford and their +neighbourhood.'" + +In the course of three or four days this protest received 4,800 +signatures. + +By way of counteracting this energetic protest, on the 27th of August Lord +Sidmouth communicated to the Manchester Magistrates and to Major Trafford +and the military serving under him the thanks of the Prince Regent "for +their prompt, decisive, and efficient measures for preservation of the +public peace on August the 16th." + +Meanwhile hundreds of persons wounded on that fatal day were enduring +dreadful suffering. They were disabled from work; not daring to apply for +parish relief; not even daring to apply for surgical aid, lest, in the +arbitrary spirit of the time, their acknowledgment that they had received +their wounds on St. Peter's field might send them to prison--perhaps to +the scaffold. + +A committee was formed for the purpose of making a rigid enquiry into the +cases of those who had been killed and wounded; and subscriptions were +raised for their relief. After an enquiry of many successive weeks the +committee published the cases of eleven killed and five hundred and sixty +wounded, of whom about a hundred and twenty were females. + +The Rev. W. R. Hay, Chairman of the Bench of Magistrates, was rewarded by +being presented to the living of Rochdale, worth L2,000 a year. + +Hunt and his companions were committed to Lancaster, and subsequently +tried at York, where he was found guilty and sentenced to be imprisoned +for two years and a half, and Johnson, Healey, and Bamford to one year's +imprisonment. + +The bloody proceedings at Peterloo startled the whole nation. Meetings +were held everywhere, denouncing them in the strongest terms. Sir Francis +Burdett addressed a letter to the Electors of Westminster, expressing his +"Shame, grief, and indignation" at the proceedings, and was prosecuted by +the Attorney-General for Libel and was fined L2,000 and imprisoned for +three months. Lord Fitzwilliam, for attending a public meeting to express +disapprobation at the means by which the meeting at Peterloo was +dispersed, was dismissed from his office as Lord Lieutenant of Yorkshire. + +These proceedings produced a deep impression on the minds of thoughtful +men, who began to think we were on the brink of despotism, and that the +time had arrived when the country should be no longer ruled by Landowners +and Boroughmongers, but by representatives chosen by the people.... + + + + +[Illustration: BANNER CARRIED AT PETERLOO + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 75_] + + +APPENDIX A. + +Some Relics of Peterloo + + +1.--A BANNER CARRIED AT PETERLOO. + +At the entrance to the Reading-room of the Reform Club at Middleton (on +the left as you reach the door) may be seen one of the Banners carried at +Peterloo by the Middleton contingent, which was led by Samuel Bamford. It +is of green material (or so it seemed to me) and the letters are stamped +on it in gold capitals. The motto facing the entrance is LIBERTY AND +FRATERNITY. On the other side of the Banner (seen from within the room) +are the words: UNITY AND STRENGTH. The explanatory inscription reads: +"This Banner was carried by the Middleton Reformers, with Samuel Bamford +at their head, to Peterloo, and is frequently mentioned in the historical +records of that movement." (See Illustration opposite). + +In chapter XXXIII. of _Passages in the Life of a Radical_ Bamford speaks +of "the colours; a blue one of silk, with inscriptions in golden letters: +UNITY AND STRENGTH, LIBERTY AND FRATERNITY. A green one of silk, with +golden letters, PARLIAMENTS ANNUAL, SUFFRAGE UNIVERSAL." Apparently the +Banner here figured is the one of which he writes later in chapter XXXVI.: +"I rejoined my companions [_i.e._, after Peterloo], and forming about a +thousand of them into file, we set off to the sound of fife and drum, +_with our only banner waving_, and in that form we re-entered the town of +Middleton. The Banner was exhibited from a window of the Suffield's Arms +public-house." The Banner is now carefully preserved between sheets of +glass. The photograph was taken under considerable difficulties as regards +light by Mr. R. H. Fletcher, of Eccles. The Chadderton Banner, though much +dilapidated, is also still in existence, but I could not obtain the +address of the person in whose keeping it is. She had left Chadderton, and +was living at Blackpool. + + +2.--BAMFORD'S COTTAGE. + +Some distance higher up the town may be seen the house where Bamford lived +at the date of Peterloo. Over the door is a stone inscribed: "Samuel +Bamford resided and was arrested in this house, Aug. 26, 1819." Bamford +describes the event in detail in chapter XL of the work named above, +beginning: "About two o'clock on the morning of Thursday, the twenty-sixth +of August, that is, on the tenth morning after the fatal meeting, I was +awoke by footsteps in the street opposite my residence. Presently they +increased in number, etc." The photograph is again by Mr. R. H. Fletcher. +(See Illustration.) In the Churchyard above may be seen Bamford's tomb and +also the monument raised to his memory. + + +[Illustration: SAMUEL BAMFORD'S HOUSE AT MIDDLETON + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 76_] + + +3.--CONSTABLES' STAVES. + +(_a_) In the Catalogue of the _Old Manchester & Salford Exhibition_ (held +at the Art Gallery in 1904), on p. 27, exhibit 157 appears as "Handcuffs +belonging to Joe Nadin, Deputy Constable of Manchester at the time of +Peterloo;" lent by G. C. Yates, Esq. On the same page, exhibit 167 is a +"Special Constable's Staff, used at the time of Peterloo in Manchester, +and then the property of Mr. Beever;" lent by C. Shiel, Esq. This +collection is now for the most part dispersed. + + +[Illustration: THREE RELICS OF PETERLOO + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher_ + +_To face page 77_] + + +(_b_) Mr. T. Swindells, of Monton Green, in the third volume of his +_Manchester Streets and Manchester Men_, mentions "A Special Constable's +Staff" given to him by a descendant of James Fildes. It is inscribed: "A +relic of Peterloo. Special Constable's Staff which belonged to the late +James and Thomas Fildes, grocers, Shudehill, Manchester." + +(_c_) In November, 1919, on the afternoon of the day on which I was to +lecture on _The Story of Peterloo_, at the Rylands Library, Mr. W. W. +Manfield, of Chorlton-cum-Hardy, brought me three interesting relics of +Peterloo, which have been in the possession of his family since 1819. On +the occasion of Peterloo his father and grandfather saw the crowd +streaming through Salford after the catastrophe, and their curiosity led +them to walk out to St. Peter's fields. There they picked up the three +relics, which have been carefully preserved ever since. One of them is a +long, heavy Constable's baton, apparently of rosewood, with the Royal Arms +painted at the thicker end. (See Illustration opposite.) + + +4.--HEAD OF FLAGSTAFF. + +The second of Mr. Manfield's relics is the head of one of the Banner poles +carried at Peterloo. It is shaped like the traditional cap of Liberty, and +inscribed in neat gilt capitals: "Hunt and Liberty." (See Illustration.) + + +5.--HUSSAR'S PLUME. + +The third of Mr. Manfield's relics is a plume of horsehair, apparently +originally dyed red, though (if so) much of the dye has faded. This, it +may be presumed, was the plume from the helmet of one of the Hussars. It +has been mentioned that the 15th Hussars wear a scarlet plume. These three +relics have been photographed on one plate by Mr. Fletcher. (See +Illustration opposite to page 77.) + + +6.--ACCOUNT-BOOK OF THE RELIEF COMMITTEE. + +In the year of the Centenary, Mr. Guppy was fortunate enough to secure for +the Rylands Library the actual Account-Book used by one of the Committees +formed for the relief of those injured in the fray. A single page of this +book has been photographed by Mr. R. H. Fletcher for the present volume. +(See Illustration.) Mr. Guppy's account of the volume (_Bulletin of +Rylands Library_, April to November, 1919, p. 191) is as follows:-- + +"The Library has been fortunate in being able to acquire a small octavo +account-book, leather bound, which seems to have been an official record +of the casualties at Peterloo which were dealt with by one of the Relief +Committees. It contains details of the names, addresses, and injuries of +347 individuals, particulars of the successive grants made to them by one +Committee, and references to the grants made by another Committee +(possibly two others). + +The details given are corroborative of many of the statements in Mr. +Bruton's _Story of Peterloo_. Thus: the cases include those of Elizabeth +Gaunt (mentioned on pp. 274 and 275), of Mrs. Fildes (on p. 274), of +Thomas Redford (on pp. 285, 291, and 294). There are references to the +loose timber (see pp. 269, 284 and 294), the injuries to Special +Constables (see p. 280), the fight near the Friends' Meeting-house (see +pp. 284 and 289), the oak trees growing near that building (see pp. 269, +294), the white hat as a symbol of Radicalism (see p. 273), the fear of +losing employment evinced by the wounded (see p. 291), the infantry +intercepting fugitives (see p. 290), the child killed by a trooper in +Cooper Street (see p. 277), and so on. The sum total voted by this +Committee appears to have been L687; it must be remembered, however, that +the sum of L3,000 mentioned on p. 291 as having been subscribed may have +been used partly for legal expenses. + + +[Illustration: One Page of the Account Book of the Relief Committee. + +_By permission of Mr. H. Guppy._ + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher._] + + +Since this manuscript account-book came to light, Mr. Bruton has +discovered a printed Report of the Relief Committee, in which 560 cases +are described, and the amount raised to date is given as L3,408 1s. 8d., +and pronounced to be inadequate for 600 people. It also gives the amount +spent on legal expenses as L1,077." + + +7.--ACCOUNT-BOOK RECORDING AMOUNTS RAISED FOR THE RELIEF OF SPECIAL +CONSTABLES & THEIR FAMILIES. + +I have to thank Dr. A. A. Mumford for calling my attention to another +account-book connected with Peterloo, which I believe he met with while +going over the Crossley papers at the Chetham Library. Its number in the +Library Catalogue is MS. B. 3. 70. It is a small note-book ruled for cash, +and entitled: "Subscriptions for Special Constables. Nos. 10 and 11." +There is a note of a Resolution carried on August 27th, 1819, to the +effect that a Relief Fund should be raised on behalf of Special Constables +injured at Peterloo and their families. The subscriptions recorded in this +book range from L1 to L10 10s., and amount in all to about L400. + + + + +APPENDIX B. + + +1.--NOTE ON THE CASUALTIES AT PETERLOO. + +On few points do the accounts of Peterloo vary more than on the question +of the casualties. There is sufficient historical material available to +enable us to investigate this matter in detail, but the task would be a +gruesome one, and no useful object would be attained if it were +accomplished. On the other hand, a few words may serve to show whereabouts +the truth lies. + +In the _Cambridge Modern History_ (Vol. X., pp. 580, 581) it is stated +that "a man was killed and forty were injured." In the _Political History +of England_ (1906, Vol. XI., pp. 178, 179) we read that "happily the +actual loss of life did not exceed five or six, but a much larger number +were more or less wounded." A number of the most important school +histories in use at the present time reproduce one or the other of these +statements _verbatim_. + +If we turn to the contemporary records, they are somewhat conflicting. The +hurried estimates given by the local papers immediately after the +catastrophe (_e.g._, one newspaper reported twelve killed) had to be +corrected later. The most general estimate seems to be "eleven killed and +between 500 and 600 wounded." When we come to examine these figures in +detail, however, these points emerge: (1) "Killed" is evidently taken to +include the cases of those who died after lingering (possibly) for some +weeks. (2) The summary includes the casualties due to the firing of the +infantry in the neighbourhood of New Cross, some hours after the great +event; included in the list, also will be the child (Fildes) knocked from +its mother's arms by one of the yeomanry as they were riding to the +meeting. + +Archibald Prentice, in his _Historical Sketches and Personal Recollections +of Manchester_ (p. 167), states that eleven were killed, that 420 were +wounded, and that there still remained (according to the Relief +Committee's Report) 140 cases to be investigated, making a total of 560. +Mr. John Benjamin Smith (who very likely refreshed his memory by looking +up records when writing his Reminiscences) gives the same result. Mr. J. +C. Hobhouse, speaking in the House of Commons, on May 19th, 1821, said +that "he held in his hand a list of killed and wounded running to 25-30 +sheets, and defied them to disprove it." It is clear, then, that these +estimates are quoted from the Committee's Report, and to this it will be +well now to turn. + +With the kind assistance of Mr. Swann, of the Reference Library, I have +been able to find one (and only one) copy of this Report. It is bound up +with a series of papers catalogued as "Lancashire and Yorkshire Tracts," +at the Manchester Reference Library. (The Reference number is "Lancashire +and Yorkshire Tracts; Barlow's Historical Collector. H. 63. 3. No. 3 +(15104)"). It is entitled: "Report of the Metropolitan and Central +Committee appointed for the Relief of the Manchester Sufferers, with an +Appendix containing the names of the sufferers and the nature and extent +of their injuries; also an account of the distribution of funds, and other +documents. Published by order of the Committee. London, 1820." This +Committee seems to have been formed by amalgamating several organisations +in the metropolis which sprang into being as a result of public sympathy +with the sufferers, and it worked in conjunction with the Manchester and +other Lancashire Committees. The subscriptions recorded to date amount to +L3,408 1s. 8d. of which L1,206 13s. 8d. had been distributed, L250 having +been received from the local Manchester Committees. The amount expended on +law charges and expenses of witnesses is given as L1,077 6s. 9d.; +advertisements and sundries cost L355 13s. 6d.; and this leaves a balance +of over L768, which is pronounced inadequate to deal with the cases that +remain. A fresh appeal is therefore made to the British Public. A +Deputation was sent from London to investigate cases, and this Deputation +reports, in January, 1820, that out of 420 sufferers visited and relieved +113 are females; that 130 received severe sabre-cuts, 14 of these being +females. (To be quite safe, we must admit the possibility that the term +"sufferers" may sometimes include members of the families of those killed +or injured.) There follow 38 pages filled with the names of those killed +and wounded at Peterloo, some 430 in all, with full details of their +injuries, and in the case of the former the description is "Killed, _or_, +who have subsequently died in consequence of injuries there received," the +number of these being given as eleven. Of these eleven: two were "sabred;" +one was "sabred and trampled upon;" one was "sabred and stabbed;" one +"sabred and crushed;" two (one of them a woman) "rode over by the +cavalry;" one "trampled by the cavalry;" one "inwardly crushed;" and one +(a woman) "thrown into a cellar." In the case of two of these the words +are added "killed on the spot." The child killed in Cooper Street +completes the total. + +One of the Relief Committees met at Mr. Prentice's warehouse, and the care +with which the various cases were investigated, and successive grants made +from the funds of the different Committees, is clearly shown by the +details given in the account-book secured by Mr. Guppy in 1919 for the +Rylands Library, which is mentioned above. + +Perhaps it will never be possible to say exactly how many were left dead +on the field. One, at anyrate, who died at once, or very shortly +afterwards, was (by a strange irony) a Special Constable, and this is +probably the "one man killed" of some of the accounts. It will be +remembered that Lieut. Jolliffe reported "two women not likely to recover; +one man in a dying state; and two or three reputed dead;" in the letter +quoted above, describing his visit to the Infirmary on the Sunday +following the event. + +Most of the cases investigated by the Committees belonged to the side of +the Reformers; but it must not be forgotten that the other side claimed to +have serious casualties. Mr. Francis Phillips, _e.g._, enumerates the +casualties to the troops, and an estimate of these is given also in the +Centenary Volume of the Cheshire Yeomanry; we have already seen above, +moreover, that a subscription list was opened for the families of the +Special Constables, and that the appeal met with a generous response. It +is a curious feature of the case that each side seems to be anxious to +make its casualty list as imposing as possible. An interesting summary of +the various estimates is given by MacDonnell in his _State Trials_. This +summary includes the Official Report from the Infirmary, and the list of +casualties to the troops. Without pursuing the matter further, we may say +that a careful examination of the somewhat confusing evidence would seem +to show that the estimate "eleven killed and between 500 and 600 wounded" +will not prove to be far wrong, provided that (1) we understand "killed" +to include those who died as the result of injuries received on the field; +(2) we include in the general total the casualties incurred during the +disturbances some hours later in the neighbourhood of New Cross. At least +one list, published subsequently, brings the total of killed up to +fourteen. + + * * * * * + +Two points not directly concerned with this discussion are dealt with by +the Relief Committee, and are sufficiently interesting to be recorded: (1) +The Committee paid out L710 "on account of the Trial at York; the +Manchester Committee voting L100 for the same object." (2) The Deputation +sent from London to investigate the cases, mentioned in their Report some +striking details of the conditions of life amongst the operatives. To +quote only two sentences: "in no one instance among the weavers did your +Deputation see a morsel of animal food, and they ascertained that in most +families where there were children the taste of meat was unknown from one +year to another." "Six shillings a week was the average wage of an +able-bodied and industrious weaver. Many could not get this." + + +2.--PRESENCE OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN AT PETERLOO. + +It has often been asserted that the peaceful intentions of the crowd at +Peterloo are attested by the presence among them of women and young +children. As every detail of evidence is of value, I give here a sentence +from a letter which I received from Principal Reynolds: "My father was +there, in his mother's arms, though only one year old; so my grandmother +told me." + + +3.--SOME GLEANINGS FROM THE SCRAP-BOOKS. + +It was the custom in the early decades of the nineteenth century, when +newspapers were dear and newspaper files were not available, as there were +no free libraries, to collect newspaper cuttings and illustrations, with +tracts and "broadsides," election squibs and so forth, in large +scrap-books. Thus, at the Peel Park Library is preserved the scrap-book of +Joseph Brotherton (for many years Member for Salford), running to over +forty volumes. The Greaves scrap-book at the Reference Library contains a +valuable collection of this kind. The Owen collection at the same Library +fills over eighty volumes. At the Chetham Library may be seen Lord +Ellesmere's scrap-book and a number of others. From many references to +Peterloo in these books we may select the three items which follow: The +Greaves collection contains a rare print of Peterloo, somewhat lurid in +its detail. Mr. Albert Nicholson has in his possession a highly-coloured +copy of this, which he has shown me. No other copies seem to be known. + +I have to thank Mr. J. J. Phelps for calling my attention to two papers in +a scrap-book at the Chetham Library which he conjectures to have been that +of Mr. Francis Phillips, the protagonist on behalf of the magistrates, and +the author of _An Exposure of the Calumnies, &c._ One of these is the +actual subpoena which Mr. Phillips received, summoning him to give +evidence in the trial at York: "there to testify the truth on our behalf +against Henry Hunt and others for certain misdemeanours whereof they are +indicted." (MS. B. 9. 41. 110. p. 43.). + +The other paper is of some importance as it fixes the date of the +embodiment of the Manchester Yeomanry. In _The Story of Peterloo_ (p. 13) +some details are given in support of a conjecture that the corps was +formed later than March in 1817. The scrap-book just quoted confirms this +conjecture, for there appears a printed copy of a letter addressed to the +Boroughreeves and Constables of Manchester and Salford, and bearing over a +hundred signatures (that of Mr. Phillips coming second), asking that a +meeting may be convened with the object of forming such a corps. In +response to this appeal the Boroughreeves and Constables summoned a +meeting for the purpose, in a letter dated Manchester, June the 16th, +1817. (MS B. 9. 41. 110. p. 22). With this date as a guide, it was easy to +find in the advertisement columns of _Wheeler's Manchester Chronicle_ for +Saturday, June the 21st, 1817, a copy of both letters, a list of the +signatures, and the announcement that the proposed meeting was actually +held on June the 19th, 1817, when it was resolved: "that under the present +circumstances it is expedient to form a body of Yeomanry Cavalry in the +Towns and neighbourhood of Manchester and Salford." Details follow as to +Government allowances for uniform, etc., and as to the possibility of +amalgamating with similar corps in the surrounding towns, should such be +formed. Each man was to provide his own horse. + +This information has an important bearing on the tragedy of Peterloo, and +taken in conjunction with the Resolution of the Magistrates mentioned in +_The Story of Peterloo_ (p. 13), leaves no doubt as to what was the nature +of the "present circumstances" that called the corps into being. + + +4.--EXPLANATION OF THE CONTEMPORARY PLAN AND PICTURE OF PETERLOO. + +(_a_) The Contemporary Plan of St. Peter's Field which appears on the +following page was published in Farquharson's verbatim Report of the Trial +in 1822. As the lettering is small, some explanation is necessary. + +The shaded area in the centre represents the open space on which the +tragedy was enacted. To the south of it is clearly seen the "raised +ground" mentioned by Stanley, and shown also in his Plan. The windmill +which stood near, and gave its name to Windmill Street, had disappeared +some years before. The site of it is now occupied by the Central Station +Approach. + +On the shaded space are marked: "Hustings;" "Carriage" (_i.e._, Mr. Hunt's +carriage, marked also on Stanley's Plan); the double line of "Constables;" +and the "Manchester Yeomanry," drawn up in front of the row of houses in +Mount Street, labelled: "Magistrates assembled here." The Friends' Meeting +House is marked "Quaker's Meeting House," and the enclosing wall is stated +to measure in height "3 ft. 7 in. on the inside" and "10 ft. 3 in. on the +outside." These measurements would be inserted, probably, in connection +with the statement that one of the Cavalry jumped his horse over this +wall. Apparently a gate and posts cross Mount Street in front of the +Meeting House, and lead into "St. Peter's Field," across which two dotted +lines indicate the _projected_ line of Peter Street. + + +[Illustration: Plan of Peterloo. From Farquharson's Report of the Trial, +1822. (See page 88.) + +_Photo by R. H. Fletcher._] + + +The position of the Troops and the line of their approach to the Field are +shown as follows: The "31st Infantry" are drawn up in Brazennose Street, +the upper end of which is also blocked with a gate and posts; the "88th +Infantry" are lined up in Dickinson Street; in Portland Street are the +"Manchester Yeomanry," and their course is shown by a dotted line up +Portland Street, along Nicholas Street, down Cooper Street, and then round +the corner of Cooper's garden wall (now the site of the north-western +corner of the Midland Hotel) into Mount Street; the Plan stating that "The +Manchester Yeomanry came this way to the ground;" another troop of the +"Manchester Yeomanry" is drawn up in front of St. John's Church, in Byrom +Street; facing them, in the same street, are shown the "15th Hussars" in +two sections, presumably representing the "two squadrons" mentioned by +Lieutenant Jolliffe in his letter; lastly, the "Cheshire Yeomanry" are +drawn up in St. John's Street, off Deansgate, and the line of approach of +all these mounted troops is shown by a dotted line passing along Byrom +Street, St. John's Street, southward down Deansgate, then along Fleet +Street, up Lower Mosley Street, and along the "raised ground" already +mentioned to St. Peter's Field, the inscription on the Plan reading: "The +15th Hussars, one troop of the Manchester and Cheshire Yeomanry came this +way to the ground." The artillery are not shewn. + +The scale of yards given on the Plan shows that Stanley's estimate of a +hundred yards as the distance from Mr. Buxton's house to the Hustings was +exactly correct. + +(_b_) Wroe's Contemporary Picture of Peterloo, which is shewn on the +following page, is perhaps the best of a number of sketches extant. The +details are fairly accurate. In the background, on the extreme left, is +seen (to quote Bamford) "the corner of a garden wall, round which the +Manchester Yeomanry, in blue and white uniform, came trotting, sword in +hand, to the front of a row of new houses." The "corner" is on the site of +the north-western corner of the Midland Hotel. The "new houses" were on +the site of the present Midland Buffet. Mr. Ewart's factory, in the +distance, was just off Lower Mosley Street. The row of houses to the right +of this, in the background, was on the upper side of Windmill Street. The +Hustings are on the site of the south-eastern corner of the Free Trade +Hall. Standing on them we may distinguish Mr. Hunt and the Leader of the +Manchester Female Reformers. Around them are the Banners of the various +contingents; we may even make out the legend "No Corn Laws" on the one in +front. The Banner-poles are shaped to resemble caps of Liberty, as shown +in another of our illustrations. The crowd are occupying the site of the +Free Trade Hall, the Theatre Royal, the Y.M.C.A., the Gaiety, and a number +of adjoining buildings. + + +[Illustration: A VIEW OF St PETER'S PLACE + +_To face page 90_] + + +The moment seized by the artist for his picture is that in which the +Manchester Yeomanry, many of whom are scattered and entangled among the +crowd, have reached the Hustings, while in the distance the Hussars can +just be seen lining up in Mount Street and charging to their relief. The +crowd, consisting of men, women and children, are seen dispersing in all +directions. + +The view might be imagined to have been taken from the roof of a building +which then occupied the site of the present Albert Hall, in Peter Street. +Other contemporary prints include St. Peter's Church and the Friends' +Meeting House in the picture. + + + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[1] I met Mr. Buxton on the steps of his house, not at all aware till then +that his _residence_ was at or near the place of meeting. I had been +directed to his _shop_, considerably beyond the square, to which I was +proceeding. I state this to prove that what I afterwards saw was purely +accidental, and that I had no previous intention of witnessing in detail +the transactions of the day. As I came from the bottom of Alport Street, +on the Altrincham side of Manchester, my original directions were indeed +to pass through St. Peter's field as the shortest line, but I had taken a +circuitous route to avoid the meeting, which led me to the corner of it +near Mr. Buxton's house. + +[2] It has been stated, upon evidence which I should be unwilling to +discredit, that the body of persons more immediately in contact with the +hustings were of Hunt's party. My reasons for believing them at the time +to be (as I was told) special constables, were because they resembled them +in appearance, were connected in their lines, had their hats on, and +staves of office occasionally appeared amongst them. Mr. Hay, in his +official letter, says: "A body of special constables took their ground, +about two hundred in number, close to the hustings, from whence there was +a line of communication to the house where we were." This is precisely my +view of the case; doubtless, had the communication been cut, he would have +noticed it. + +[3] Some, by being better mounted or rather in advance, might have been +more moderate in their pace, but generally speaking it was very rapid, and +I use the word gallop, as conveying the best idea of their approach. + +[4] I am particular in mentioning these minute circumstances, because in +this and some other points in which I could not be mistaken, I have been +strongly contradicted. + +[5] It has been often asked when and where the cavalry struck the people. +I can only say that from the moment they began to force their way through +the crowd towards the hustings swords were up and swords were down, but +whether they fell with the sharp or flat side, of course I cannot pretend +to give an opinion. + +[6] On quitting the ground I for the first time observed that strong +bodies of infantry were posted in the streets, on opposite sides of the +square; their appearance might probably have increased the alarm and would +certainly have impeded the progress of a mob wishing to retreat in either +of those directions. When I saw them they were resting on their arms, and +I believe they remained stationary, taking no part in the transaction. + +[7] On entering Mosley Street at 12 o'clock I stopped to question some +persons on the footway respecting the proceedings of the day. When about +to proceed, I was recommended to move from the middle of the street to the +path, as the mob were advancing. I declined, suspecting my advisers might +be radicals, adding: "I am on the King's highway, and shall remain where I +am." I mention this because I have heard it reported that I was insulted +by the Ashton people, which may have originated from the above account. + +[8] [In the copy of Farquharson's verbatim Report of the Trial, which is +preserved at the Reference Library, Manchester, this "not" is omitted. The +omission is, of course, due to a misprint, and someone has inserted "not" +in pencil. Similarly, in my own copy of Farquharson's Report, someone has +inserted the "not" in ink. McDonnell, in his "State Trials," inserted the +"not." Mr. McKennell's evidence, as reported in Farquharson, is as follows +(pp. 169, 170; he was cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant Hullock):-- + +By whom was the Riot Act read? + +--I never heard it read. + +You heard no such thing? + +--I did not. + +EDITOR.] + +[9] [St. John Street or Byrom Street.--EDITOR.] + +[10] [South-east would be more correct.--EDITOR.] + +[11] [East would be more correct. The Cheshire Yeomanry filed along the +south side. The arrows in Stanley's Plan make this clear.--EDITOR.] + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Three Accounts of Peterloo, by +Edward Stanley and William Jolliffe and John Benjamin Smith + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THREE ACCOUNTS OF PETERLOO *** + +***** This file should be named 37004.txt or 37004.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/0/0/37004/ + +Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images +generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian +Libraries.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/37004.zip b/37004.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0d2f54d --- /dev/null +++ b/37004.zip diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0b798ba --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #37004 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/37004) |
