summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:05:12 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:05:12 -0700
commitec7935c8d76d98c7a72521e542b299efe2f9706e (patch)
tree70dd1aeab8d06242170295668c169a262139b95e
initial commit of ebook 36154HEADmain
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--36154-pdf.pdfbin0 -> 577424 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-pdf.zipbin0 -> 479066 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t.zipbin0 -> 160302 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/36154-t.tex5600
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo002.pngbin0 -> 1178 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo036.pngbin0 -> 3509 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo037.pngbin0 -> 950 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo038.pngbin0 -> 2619 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo039.pngbin0 -> 7173 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo041.pngbin0 -> 5345 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo045.pngbin0 -> 4300 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo047a.pngbin0 -> 2664 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo047b.pngbin0 -> 3926 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo052.pngbin0 -> 491 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo053.pngbin0 -> 4591 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo054.pngbin0 -> 3358 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo066.pngbin0 -> 997 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo070.pngbin0 -> 6222 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo072.pngbin0 -> 1063 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo073.pngbin0 -> 1095 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo074.pngbin0 -> 1667 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo079a.pngbin0 -> 4577 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo079b.pngbin0 -> 2726 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo081.pngbin0 -> 6706 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo101a.pngbin0 -> 618 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/images/illo101b.pngbin0 -> 1660 bytes
-rw-r--r--36154-t/old/36154-t.tex5594
-rw-r--r--36154-t/old/36154-t.zipbin0 -> 160456 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
31 files changed, 11210 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/36154-pdf.pdf b/36154-pdf.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..99ce15b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-pdf.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-pdf.zip b/36154-pdf.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..50e3fe4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-pdf.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t.zip b/36154-t.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ec77486
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/36154-t.tex b/36154-t/36154-t.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..49e6a02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/36154-t.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,5600 @@
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on %
+% Mathematics, by Felix Klein %
+% %
+% This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with %
+% almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or %
+% re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included %
+% with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org %
+% %
+% %
+% Title: The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on Mathematics %
+% Delivered From Aug. 28 to Sept. 9, 1893 Before Members of %
+% the Congress of Mathematics Held in Connection with the %
+% World's Fair in Chicago %
+% %
+% Author: Felix Klein %
+% %
+% Release Date: May 18, 2011 [EBook #36154] %
+% Most recently updated: June 11, 2021 %
+% %
+% Language: English %
+% %
+% Character set encoding: UTF-8 %
+% %
+% *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM *** %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\def\ebook{36154}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%% %%
+%% Packages and substitutions: %%
+%% %%
+%% book: Required. %%
+%% inputenc: Standard DP encoding. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% ifthen: Logical conditionals. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% amsmath: AMS mathematics enhancements. Required. %%
+%% amssymb: Additional mathematical symbols. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% alltt: Fixed-width font environment. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% footmisc: Extended footnote capabilities. Required. %%
+%% perpage: Start footnote numbering on each page. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% indentfirst: Indent first word of each sectional unit. Optional. %%
+%% textcase: Apply \MakeUppercase (et al.) only to text, not math. %%
+%% Required. %%
+%% yfonts: Gothic snippets in the copyright material. Optional. %%
+%% %%
+%% calc: Length calculations. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% fancyhdr: Enhanced running headers and footers. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% caption: Configurable caption styles. Required. %%
+%% graphicx: Standard interface for graphics inclusion. Required. %%
+%% wrapfig: Illustrations surrounded by text. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% geometry: Enhanced page layout package. Required. %%
+%% hyperref: Hypertext embellishments for pdf output. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Producer's Comments: %%
+%% %%
+%% Changes are noted in this file in three ways. %%
+%% 1. \DPnote{} for in-line `placeholder' notes. %%
+%% 2. \DPtypo{}{} for typographical corrections, showing original %%
+%% and replacement text side-by-side. %%
+%% 3. [** TN: Note]s for lengthier or stylistic comments. %%
+%% %%
+%% With a small number of exceptions, journal titles in the book %%
+%% are italicized in running text and not italicized in footnotes. %%
+%% Instances have been noted and made consistent. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compilation Flags: %%
+%% %%
+%% The following behavior may be controlled by boolean flags. %%
+%% %%
+%% ForPrinting (false by default): %%
+%% Compile a screen-optimized PDF file. Set to false for print- %%
+%% optimized file (pages cropped, one-sided, blue hyperlinks). %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% PDF pages: 119 (if ForPrinting set to false) %%
+%% PDF page size: 5.25 x 8" (non-standard) %%
+%% PDF bookmarks: created, point to ToC entries %%
+%% PDF document info: filled in %%
+%% Images: 22 png diagrams %%
+%% %%
+%% Summary of log file: %%
+%% %%
+%% * Four underfull hboxes. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compile History: %%
+%% %%
+%% May, 2011: adhere (Andrew D. Hwang) %%
+%% texlive2007, GNU/Linux %%
+%% %%
+%% Command block: %%
+%% %%
+%% pdflatex x2 %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% May 2011: pglatex. %%
+%% Compile this project with: %%
+%% pdflatex 36154-t.tex ..... TWO times %%
+%% %%
+%% pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) %%
+%% %%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\listfiles
+\documentclass[12pt]{book}[2005/09/16]
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% PACKAGES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}[2006/05/05]
+
+\usepackage{ifthen}[2001/05/26] %% Logical conditionals
+
+\usepackage{amsmath}[2000/07/18] %% Displayed equations
+\usepackage{amssymb}[2002/01/22] %% and additional symbols
+
+\usepackage{alltt}[1997/06/16] %% boilerplate, credits, license
+
+ %% extended footnote capabilities
+\usepackage[symbol,perpage]{footmisc}[2005/03/17]
+\usepackage{perpage}[2006/07/15]
+
+\usepackage[font=footnotesize,labelformat=empty]{caption}[2007/01/07]
+\usepackage{graphicx}[1999/02/16]%% For diagrams
+\usepackage{wrapfig}[2003/01/31] %% and wrapping text around them
+
+\usepackage{indentfirst}[1995/11/23]
+\usepackage{textcase}[2004/10/07]
+
+\IfFileExists{yfonts.sty}{%
+ \usepackage{yfonts}[2003/01/08]
+}{%
+ \providecommand{\textgoth}[1]{\textbf{#1}}
+}
+
+\usepackage{calc}[2005/08/06]
+
+% for running heads
+\usepackage{fancyhdr}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% Interlude: Set up PRINTING (default) or SCREEN VIEWING %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+% ForPrinting=true (default) false
+% Asymmetric margins Symmetric margins
+% Black hyperlinks Blue hyperlinks
+% Start Preface, ToC, etc. recto No blank verso pages
+%
+% Chapter-like ``Sections'' start both recto and verso in the scanned
+% book. This behavior has been retained.
+\newboolean{ForPrinting}
+
+%% UNCOMMENT the next line for a PRINT-OPTIMIZED VERSION of the text %%
+%\setboolean{ForPrinting}{true}
+
+%% Initialize values to ForPrinting=false
+\newcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=1:1} % Symmetric margins
+\newcommand{\HLinkColor}{blue} % Hyperlink color
+\newcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{SinglePage}
+\newcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+\newcommand{\TransNoteCommon}{%
+ This book was produced from images provided by the Cornell
+ University Library: Historical Mathematics Monographs collection.
+ \bigskip
+
+ Minor typographical corrections and presentational changes have
+ been made without comment.
+ \bigskip
+}
+
+\newcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for screen viewing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for printing. Please see the preamble of the \LaTeX\
+ source file for instructions.
+}
+%% Re-set if ForPrinting=true
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \renewcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=2:3} % Asymmetric margins
+ \renewcommand{\HLinkColor}{black} % Hyperlink color
+ \renewcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{TwoPageRight}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for printing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for screen viewing. Please see the preamble of the
+ \LaTeX\ source file for instructions.
+ }
+}{% If ForPrinting=false, don't skip to recto
+ \renewcommand{\cleardoublepage}{\clearpage}
+}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% End of PRINTING/SCREEN VIEWING code; back to packages %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in}%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}%
+ \usepackage[body={5in,6.66in},\Margins]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{5.25in}%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{8in}%
+ \raggedbottom
+ \usepackage[body={5in,6.66in},\Margins,includeheadfoot]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+}
+
+\providecommand{\ebook}{00000} % Overridden during white-washing
+\usepackage[pdftex,
+ hyperfootnotes=false,
+ pdftitle={The Project Gutenberg eBook \#\ebook: The Evanston Colloquium},
+ pdfauthor={Felix Klein},
+ pdfkeywords={Brenda Lewis, Andrew D. Hwang,
+ Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team,
+ Cornell University Historical Mathematical Monographs Collection},
+ pdfstartview=Fit, % default value
+ pdfstartpage=1, % default value
+ pdfpagemode=UseNone, % default value
+ bookmarks=true, % default value
+ linktocpage=false, % default value
+ pdfpagelayout=\PDFPageLayout,
+ pdfdisplaydoctitle,
+ pdfpagelabels=true,
+ bookmarksopen=true,
+ bookmarksopenlevel=1,
+ colorlinks=true,
+ linkcolor=\HLinkColor]{hyperref}[2007/02/07]
+
+% Re-crop screen-formatted version, accommodating wide displays
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}
+ {}
+ {\hypersetup{pdfpagescrop= 0 30 560 765}}
+
+%%%% Fixed-width environment to format PG boilerplate %%%%
+\newenvironment{PGtext}{%
+\begin{alltt}
+\fontsize{9.2}{10.5}\ttfamily\selectfont}%
+{\end{alltt}}
+
+%%%% Misc global parameters
+\setlength{\emergencystretch}{1em}
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
+\MakePerPage{footnote}
+
+\hyphenation{collinea-tions einge-schrieben}
+
+\newlength{\TmpLen}
+
+% Table of contents
+\AtBeginDocument{\renewcommand{\contentsname}%
+ {\protect\centering\protect\large CONTENTS.}}
+
+\newcommand{\ToCPage}{%
+ \noindent\makebox[\textwidth][r]{{\scshape\scriptsize Lecture\hfill Page}}
+}
+\newcommand{\ToCBox}[1]{
+ \settowidth{\TmpLen}{VIII.}%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{#1}%
+}
+\newcommand{\ToCChap}[2]{%
+ \settowidth{\TmpLen}{999}%
+ \bigskip
+ \noindent\strut\parbox[b]{\textwidth-\TmpLen}{%
+ \ToCBox{#1}\hspace{0.5em}\hangindent4em #2\dotfill}%
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{\pageref{addendum}}%
+ }{%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{\pageref{lecture:#1}}
+ }
+}
+
+% Keep track of lecture number for equation cross-referencing
+\newcommand{\LectureNo}{}
+
+% Misc. semantic formatting
+\newcommand{\SetRunningHeads}[2]{%
+ \fancyhead{}
+ \setlength{\headheight}{15pt}
+ \thispagestyle{empty}
+ \fancyhead[CE]{\footnotesize\MakeTextUppercase{#1}}
+ \fancyhead[CO]{\footnotesize\MakeTextUppercase{#2}}
+
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}
+ {\fancyhead[RO,LE]{\thepage}}
+ {\fancyhead[R]{\thepage}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Heading}{\centering\normalfont\normalsize}
+
+\newcommand{\ChapterPrep}{%
+ \cleardoublepage
+ \phantomsection
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \vspace*{1in}%
+ }{}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Preface}{%
+ \ChapterPrep
+ \pdfbookmark[0]{Preface.}{Preface.}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{\protect\ToCPage}% Needs to go before all chapters
+
+ \pagestyle{fancy}
+ \fancyhf{}
+ \SetRunningHeads{Preface.}{Preface.}
+ \section*{\Heading\textsc{PREFACE.}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Addendum}[3]{%
+ \ChapterPrep
+ \label{addendum}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{\protect\ToCChap{}{The Development of Mathematics at the German Universities.}}
+ \pdfbookmark[0]{Addendum.}{Addendum.}
+
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \SetRunningHeads{The Development of Mathematics}{At the German Universities.}%
+ \section*{\Heading\MakeTextUppercase{#1} \MakeTextUppercase{#2}}
+ \subsection*{\Heading\normalsize\textsc{#3}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Lecture}[3][]{
+ \ChapterPrep
+ \label{lecture:#2}
+ \pdfbookmark[0]{Lecture #2}{Lecture #2}
+ \renewcommand{\LectureNo}{#2}
+
+ \addtocontents{toc}{\protect\ToCChap{#2}{#3}}
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{%
+ \SetRunningHeads{Lecture #2}{#3}%
+ }{%
+ \SetRunningHeads{Lecture #2}{#1}%
+ }
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#2}{I.}}{%
+ \begin{center}
+ \LARGE LECTURES ON MATHEMATICS.\\[12pt]
+ \rule{1in}{0.5pt}
+ \end{center}
+ }{}
+ \section*{\Heading\textsc{Lecture #2}: \MakeTextUppercase{#3}}
+}
+
+\newenvironment{participants}{\medskip\small}{\bigskip\normalsize}
+
+\newcommand{\Date}[1]{\subsection*{\Heading\normalsize #1}}
+\newcommand{\Name}[1]{\par\noindent\textsc{#1}\hangindent\parindent}
+\newcommand{\First}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\DPtypo}[2]{#2}
+\newcommand{\DPnote}[1]{}
+
+\newcommand{\linestretch}[1]{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\dd}{\partial}
+
+% Needs to behave "nestedly" inside \emph
+\newcommand{\ie}{\emph{i.e.}}
+
+\renewcommand{\pmod}[2][]{%
+ \ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{%
+ (\text{mod.}~#2)%
+ }{
+ \bigl[\text{mod.}~(#2)\bigr]%
+ }
+}
+
+\DeclareMathOperator{\am}{am}
+
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00A3}{\pounds}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00B0}{{}^\circ}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00B1}{\pm}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00B7}{\cdot}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00D7}{\times}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00F7}{\div}
+
+\newcommand{\Input}[2][]
+ {\ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}
+ {\includegraphics{./images/illo#2.png}}
+ {\includegraphics[width=#1]{./images/illo#2.png}}%
+}
+
+\newcounter{figno}
+\newcommand{\Figure}[2][0.9\textwidth]{%
+\begin{figure}[hbt!]
+ \refstepcounter{figno}
+ \centering
+ \Input[#1]{#2}
+ \caption{Fig.~\thefigno}
+ \label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{figure}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Figures}[4]{%
+\begin{figure}[hbt!]
+\centering
+\refstepcounter{figno}
+\begin{minipage}{0.4\textwidth}
+\hfil\Input[#1]{#2}
+\caption{Fig.\thefigno.}
+\label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{minipage}\hfil
+\refstepcounter{figno}
+\begin{minipage}{0.4\textwidth}
+\Input[#3]{#4}
+\caption{Fig.~\thefigno.}
+\label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{figure}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\WFigure}[2]{%
+\begin{wrapfigure}{o}{#1}
+ \refstepcounter{figno}
+ \centering
+ \Input[#1]{#2}
+ \caption{Fig.~\thefigno}
+ \label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Fig}[1]{\hyperref[fig:#1]{Fig.~#1}}
+
+% Equation anchors and links
+\newcommand{\Tag}[1]{%
+ \phantomsection
+ \label{eqn:\LectureNo#1}
+ \tag*{\normalsize\ensuremath{#1}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Eq}[1]{\hyperref[eqn:\LectureNo#1]{\ensuremath{#1}}}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% START OF DOCUMENT %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\pagestyle{empty}
+\pagenumbering{Alph}
+
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Front Matter}{Front Matter}
+
+%%%% PG BOILERPLATE %%%%
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG Boilerplate}{Project Gutenberg Boilerplate}
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\small
+\begin{PGtext}
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on
+Mathematics, by Felix Klein
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on Mathematics
+ Delivered From Aug. 28 to Sept. 9, 1893 Before Members of
+ the Congress of Mathematics Held in Connection with the
+ World's Fair in Chicago
+
+Author: Felix Klein
+
+Release Date: May 18, 2011 [EBook #36154]
+Most recently updated: June 11, 2021
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM ***
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+
+\clearpage
+
+
+%%%% Credits and transcriber's note %%%%
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\begin{PGtext}
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Brenda Lewis, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images from the Cornell University
+Library: Historical Mathematics Monographs collection.)
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+
+\begin{minipage}{0.85\textwidth}
+\small
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Transcriber's Note}{Transcriber's Note}
+\subsection*{\centering\normalfont\scshape%
+\normalsize\MakeLowercase{\TransNote}}%
+
+\raggedright
+\TransNoteText
+\end{minipage}
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FRONT MATTER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\frontmatter
+\pagenumbering{roman}
+%% -----File: 001.png---Folio i-------
+\null\vfill
+\begin{center}
+\Large LECTURES ON MATHEMATICS
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 002.png---Folio ii-------
+\null\vfill
+\begin{center}
+%[MacMillan Publisher's device]
+\Input[1.5in]{002}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 003.png---Folio iii-------
+\begin{center}
+\linestretch{1.2}%
+\setlength{\TmpLen}{16pt}
+\underline{\large{\textit{THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM}}}
+\vfill
+
+\huge{\textsc{Lectures on Mathematics}}
+\vfill
+
+\footnotesize\scshape
+delivered \\
+From Aug.~28 to Sept.~9, 1893 \\[\TmpLen]
+\itshape BEFORE MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESS OF MATHEMATICS \\
+HELD IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORLD'S \\
+FAIR IN CHICAGO \\[\TmpLen]
+\upshape AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY \\
+\scriptsize EVANSTON, ILL.
+\vfill
+
+BY \\
+\large FELIX KLEIN
+\vfill
+
+\footnotesize \textit{REPORTED BY ALEXANDER ZIWET}
+\vfill
+
+PUBLISHED FOR H.~S. WHITE AND A.~ZIWET \\[\TmpLen]
+\textgoth{New York} \\
+\normalsize MACMILLAN AND CO. \\
+\footnotesize AND LONDON \\
+\small 1894 \\[\TmpLen]
+\scriptsize \textit{All rights reserved}
+\end{center}
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 004.png---Folio iv-------
+\null\vfill
+\begin{center}
+\scriptsize\scshape Copyright, 1893, \\
+By MACMILLAN AND CO.
+\vfill
+
+{\footnotesize\textgoth{Norwood Press:}} \\
+\upshape J.~S. Cushing~\&~Co.---Berwick~\&~Smith. \\
+Boston, Mass., U.S.A.
+\end{center}
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 005.png---Folio v-------
+
+\Preface
+
+\First{The} Congress of Mathematics held under the auspices of
+the World's Fair Auxiliary in Chicago, from the 21st to the
+26th of August, 1893, was attended by Professor Felix Klein
+of the University of Göttingen, as one of the commissioners of
+the German university exhibit at the Columbian Exposition.
+After the adjournment of the Congress, Professor Klein kindly
+consented to hold a \textit{colloquium} on mathematics with such members
+of the Congress as might wish to participate. The Northwestern
+University at Evanston,~Ill., tendered the use of rooms
+for this purpose and placed a collection of mathematical books
+from its library at the disposal of the members of the colloquium.
+The following is a list of the members attending the
+colloquium:---
+\begin{participants}
+\Name{W.~W. Beman, A.M.}, professor of mathematics, University of Michigan.
+
+\Name{E.~M. Blake, Ph.D.}, instructor in mathematics, Columbia College.
+
+\Name{O.~Bolza, Ph.D.}, associate professor of mathematics, University of Chicago.
+
+\Name{H.~T. Eddy, Ph.D.}, president of the Rose Polytechnic Institute.
+
+\Name{A.~M. Ely, A.B.}, professor of mathematics, Vassar College.
+
+\Name{F.~Franklin, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, Johns Hopkins University.
+
+\Name{T.~F. Holgate, Ph.D.}, instructor in mathematics, Northwestern University.
+
+\Name{L.~S. Hulburt, A.M.}, instructor in mathematics, Johns Hopkins University.
+
+\Name{F.~H. Loud, A.B.}, professor of mathematics and astronomy, Colorado College.
+
+\Name{J.~McMahon, A.M.}, assistant professor of mathematics, Cornell University.
+
+\Name{H.~Maschke, Ph.D.}, assistant professor of mathematics, University of
+Chicago.
+
+\Name{E.~H. Moore, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, University of Chicago.
+%% -----File: 006.png---Folio vi-------
+
+\Name{J.~E. Oliver, A.M.}, professor of mathematics, Cornell University.
+
+\Name{A.~M. Sawin, Sc.M.}, Evanston.
+
+\Name{W.~E. Story, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, Clark University.
+
+\Name{E.~Study, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, University of Marburg.
+
+\Name{H.~Taber, Ph.D.}, assistant professor of mathematics, Clark University.
+
+\Name{H.~W. Tyler, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of
+Technology.
+
+\Name{J.~M. Van~Vleck, A.M., LL.D.}, professor of mathematics and astronomy,
+Wesleyan University.
+
+\Name{E.~B. Van~Vleck, Ph.D.}, instructor in mathematics, University of Wisconsin.
+
+\Name{C.~A. Waldo, A.M.}, professor of mathematics, De~Pauw University.
+
+\Name{H.~S. White, Ph.D.}, associate professor of mathematics, Northwestern University.
+
+\Name{M.~F. Winston, A.B.}, honorary fellow in mathematics, University of Chicago.
+
+\Name{A.~Ziwet}, assistant professor of mathematics, University of Michigan.
+\end{participants}
+
+The meetings lasted from August~28th till September~9th;
+and in the course of these two weeks Professor Klein gave a
+daily lecture, besides devoting a large portion of his time to
+personal intercourse and conferences with those attending the
+meetings. The lectures were delivered freely, in the English
+language, substantially in the form in which they are here
+given to the public. The only change made consists in obliterating
+the conversational form of the frequent questions and
+discussions by means of which Professor Klein understands so
+well to enliven his discourse. My notes, after being written
+out each day, were carefully revised by Professor Klein himself,
+both in manuscript and in the proofs.
+
+As an appendix it has been thought proper to give a translation
+of the interesting historical sketch contributed by Professor
+Klein to the work \textit{Die deutschen Universitäten}. The translation
+was prepared by Professor H.~W.~Tyler, of the Massachusetts
+Institute of Technology.
+
+It is to be hoped that the proceedings of the Chicago Congress
+of Mathematics, in which Professor Klein took a leading
+%% -----File: 007.png---Folio vii-------
+part, will soon be published in full. The papers presented to
+this Congress, and the discussions that followed their reading,
+form an important complement to the Evanston colloquium.
+Indeed, in reading the lectures here published, it should be kept
+in mind that they followed immediately upon the adjournment
+of the Chicago meeting, and were addressed to members of the
+Congress. This circumstance, in addition to the limited time
+and the informal character of the colloquium, must account
+for the incompleteness with which the various subjects are
+treated.
+
+In concluding, the editor wishes to express his thanks to
+Professors W.~W.~Beman and H.~S.~White for aid in preparing
+the manuscript and correcting the proofs.
+
+\hfill ALEXANDER ZIWET.\hspace{\parindent}
+
+{\footnotesize\textsc{Ann Arbor, Mich.,} November, 1893.}
+%% -----File: 008.png---Folio viii-------
+%[Blank Page]
+%% -----File: 009.png---Folio ix-------
+\tableofcontents
+\iffalse
+CONTENTS.
+
+Lecture Page
+
+I. Clebsch 1
+
+II. Sophus Lie 9
+
+III. Sophus Lie 18
+
+IV. On the Real Shape of Algebraic Curves and Surfaces 25
+
+V. Theory of Functions and Geometry 33
+
+VI. On the Mathematical Character of Space-Intuition, and the
+Relation of Pure Mathematics to the Applied Sciences 41
+
+VII. The Transcendency of the Numbers $e$ and $\pi$ 51
+
+VIII. Ideal Numbers 58
+
+IX. The Solution of Higher Algebraic Equations 67
+
+X. On Some Recent Advances in Hyperelliptic and Abelian Functions 75
+
+XI. The Most Recent Researches in Non-Euclidean Geometry 85
+
+XII. The Study of Mathematics at Göttingen 94
+
+The Development of Mathematics at the German Universities 99
+\fi
+%% -----File: 010.png---Folio x-------
+%[Blank Page]
+%% -----File: 011.png---Folio 1-------
+\mainmatter
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Main Matter.}{Main Matter.}
+
+%[** TN: Text printed by the \Lecture command]
+% LECTURES ON MATHEMATICS.
+\Lecture{I.}{Clebsch.}
+
+\Date{(August 28, 1893.)}
+
+\First{It} will be the object of our \textit{Colloquia} to pass in review some
+of the principal phases of the most recent development of mathematical
+thought in Germany.
+
+A brief sketch of the growth of mathematics in the German
+universities in the course of the present century has been contributed
+by me to the work \textit{Die deutschen Universitäten}, compiled
+and edited by Professor \emph{Lexis} (Berlin, Asher, 1893), for
+the exhibit of the German universities at the World's Fair.\footnote
+ {A translation of this sketch will be found in the Appendix, \hyperref[addendum]{p.~\pageref{addendum}}.}
+The strictly objective point of view that had to be adopted for
+this sketch made it necessary to break off the account about
+the year~1870. In the present more informal lectures these
+restrictions both as to time and point of view are abandoned.
+It is just the period since 1870 that I intend to deal with, and
+I shall speak of it in a more subjective manner, insisting particularly
+on those features of the development of mathematics
+in which I have taken part myself either by personal work or
+by direct observation.
+
+The first week will be devoted largely to \emph{Geometry}, taking
+this term in its broadest sense; and in this first lecture it will
+surely be appropriate to select the celebrated geometer \emph{Clebsch}
+%% -----File: 012.png---Folio 2-------
+as the central figure, partly because he was one of my principal
+teachers, and also for the reason that his work is so well known
+in this country.
+
+Among mathematicians in general, three main categories may
+be distinguished; and perhaps the names \emph{logicians}, \emph{formalists},
+and \emph{intuitionists} may serve to characterize them. (1)~The word
+\emph{logician} is here used, of course, without reference to the mathematical
+logic of Boole, Peirce,~etc.; it is only intended to indicate
+that the main strength of the men belonging to this class
+lies in their logical and critical power, in their ability to give
+strict definitions, and to derive rigid deductions therefrom.
+The great and wholesome influence exerted in Germany by
+\emph{Weierstrass} in this direction is well known. (2)~The \emph{formalists}
+among the mathematicians excel mainly in the skilful formal
+treatment of a given question, in devising for it an ``algorithm.''
+\emph{Gordan}, or let us say \emph{Cayley} and \emph{Sylvester}, must be ranged in
+this group. (3)~To the \emph{intuitionists}, finally, belong those who
+lay particular stress on geometrical intuition (\textit{Anschauung}), not
+in pure geometry only, but in all branches of mathematics.
+What Benjamin Peirce has called ``geometrizing a mathematical
+question'' seems to express the same idea. Lord \emph{Kelvin} and
+\emph{von~Staudt} may be mentioned as types of this category.
+
+\emph{Clebsch} must be said to belong both to the second and third
+of these categories, while I should class myself with the third,
+and also the first. For this reason my account of Clebsch's
+work will be incomplete; but this will hardly prove a serious
+drawback, considering that the part of his work characterized
+by the second of the above categories is already so fully appreciated
+here in America. In general, it is my intention here,
+not so much to give a complete account of any subject, as to
+\emph{supplement} the mathematical views that I find prevalent in this
+country.
+%% -----File: 013.png---Folio 3-------
+
+As the first achievement of Clebsch we must set down the
+introduction into Germany of the work done previously by
+Cayley and Sylvester in England. But he not only transplanted
+to German soil their theory of invariants and the interpretation
+of projective geometry by means of this theory; he
+also brought this theory into live and fruitful correlation with
+the fundamental ideas of Riemann's theory of functions. In
+the former respect, it may be sufficient to refer to Clebsch's
+\textit{Vorlesungen über Geometrie}, edited and continued by Lindemann;
+to his \textit{Binäre algebraische Formen}, and in general to
+what he did in co-operation with Gordan. A good historical
+account of his work will be found in the biography of Clebsch
+published in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~7.
+
+Riemann's celebrated memoir of 1857\footnote
+ {\textit{Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik,
+ Vol.~54 (1857), pp.~115--155; reprinted in Riemann's \textit{Werke}, 1876, pp.~81--135.}
+presented the new
+ideas on the theory of functions in a somewhat startling novel
+form that prevented their immediate acceptance and recognition.
+He based the theory of the Abelian integrals and their
+inverse,\DPnote{** [sic], adjective?} the Abelian functions, on the idea of the surface now
+so well known by his name, and on the corresponding fundamental
+theorems of existence (\textit{Existenztheoreme}). Clebsch, by
+taking as his starting-point an algebraic curve defined by its
+equation, made the theory more accessible to the mathematicians
+of his time, and added a more concrete interest to it
+by the geometrical theorems that he deduced from the theory
+of Abelian functions. Clebsch's paper, \textit{Ueber die Anwendung
+der Abel'schen Functionen in der Geometrie},\footnote
+ {Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik, Vol.~63 (1864), pp.~189--243.}
+and the work of
+Clebsch and Gordan on Abelian functions,\footnote
+ {\textit{Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1866.}
+are well known to
+American mathematicians; and in accordance with my plan, I
+proceed to give merely some critical remarks.
+%% -----File: 014.png---Folio 4-------
+
+However great the achievement of Clebsch's in making
+the work of Riemann more easy of access to his contemporaries,
+it is my opinion that at the present time the book of
+Clebsch is no longer to be considered as the standard work
+for an introduction to the study of Abelian functions. The
+chief objections to Clebsch's presentation are twofold: they
+can be briefly characterized as a lack of mathematical rigour
+on the one hand, and a loss of intuitiveness, of geometrical
+perspicuity, on the other. A few examples will explain my
+meaning.
+
+(\textit{a})~Clebsch bases his whole investigation on the consideration
+of what he takes to be the most general type of an
+algebraic curve, and this \emph{general} curve he assumes as having
+only double points, but no other singularities. To obtain a
+sure foundation for the theory, it must be proved that any
+algebraic curve can be transformed rationally into a curve
+having only double points. This proof was not given by
+Clebsch; it has since been supplied by his pupils and followers,
+but the demonstration is long and involved. See the
+papers by Brill and Nöther in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~7
+(1874),\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die algebraischen Functionen und ihre Anwendung in der Geometrie},
+ pp.~269--310.}
+and by Nöther, \textit{ib}., Vol.~23 (1884).\footnote
+ {\textit{Rationale Ausführung der Operationen in der Theorie der algebraischen Functionen},
+ pp.~311--358.}
+
+Another defect of the same kind occurs in connection with
+the determinant of the periods of the Abelian integrals. This
+determinant never vanishes as long as the curve is irreducible.
+But Clebsch and Gordan neglect to prove this, and
+however simple the proof may be, this must be regarded as
+an inexactness.
+
+The apparent lack of critical spirit which we find in the work
+of Clebsch is characteristic of the geometrical epoch in which
+%% -----File: 015.png---Folio 5-------
+he lived, the epoch of Steiner, among others. It detracts in no-wise
+from the merit of his work. But the influence of the
+theory of functions has taught the present generation to be
+more exacting.
+
+(\textit{b})~The second objection to adopting Clebsch's presentation
+lies in the fact that, from Riemann's point of view, many points
+of the theory become far more simple and almost self-evident,
+whereas in Clebsch's theory they are not brought out in all
+their beauty. An example of this is presented by the idea of
+the deficiency~$p$. In Riemann's theory, where $p$~represents the
+order of connectivity of the surface, the invariability of~$p$ under
+any rational transformation is self-evident, while from the point
+of view of Clebsch this invariability must be proved by means
+of a long elimination, without affording the true geometrical
+insight into its meaning.
+
+For these reasons it seems to me best to begin the theory
+of Abelian functions with Riemann's ideas, without, however,
+neglecting to give later the purely algebraical developments.
+This method is adopted in my paper on Abelian functions;\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~36 (1890), pp.~1--83.}
+it is also followed in the work \textit{Die elliptischen Modulfunctionen},
+Vols.\ I.~and~II., edited by Dr.~Fricke. A general account of the
+historical development of the theory of algebraic curves in connection
+with Riemann's ideas will be found in my (lithographed)
+lectures on \textit{Riemann'sche Flächen}, delivered in 1891--92.\footnote
+ {My lithographed lectures frequently give only an outline of the subject, omitting
+ details and long demonstrations, which are supposed to be supplied by the
+ student by private reading and a study of the literature of the subject.}
+
+If this arrangement be adopted, it is interesting to follow
+out the true relation that the algebraical developments bear
+to Riemann's theory. Thus in Brill and Nöther's theory, the
+so-called \emph{fundamental theorem} of Nöther is of primary importance.
+%% -----File: 016.png---Folio 6-------
+It gives a rule for deciding under what conditions an
+algebraic rational integral function~$f$ of~$x$ and~$y$ can be put into
+the form
+\[
+f = A \phi + B \psi,
+\]
+where~$\phi$ and~$\psi$ are likewise rational algebraic functions. Each
+point of intersection of the curves $\phi = 0$ and $\psi = 0$ must of
+course be a point of the curve $f = 0$. But there remains the
+question of multiple and singular points; and this is disposed
+of by Nöther's theorem. Now it is of great interest to investigate
+how these relations present themselves when the
+starting-point is taken from Riemann's ideas.
+
+One of the best illustrations of the utility of adopting
+Riemann's principles is presented by the very remarkable
+advance made recently by Hurwitz, in the theory of algebraic
+curves, in particular his extension of the theory of algebraic
+correspondences, an account of which is given in the second
+volume of the \textit{Elliptische Modulfunctionen}. Cayley had found
+as a fundamental theorem in this theory a rule for determining
+the number of self-corresponding points for algebraic correspondences
+of a simple kind. A whole series of very valuable
+papers by Brill, published in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen},\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber zwei Berührungsprobleme}, Vol.~4 (1871), pp.~527--549.---\textit{Ueber Entsprechen
+ von Punktsystemen auf einer Curve}, Vol.~6 (1873), pp.~33--65.---\textit{Ueber die
+ Correspondenzformel}, Vol.~7 (1874), pp.~607--622.---\textit{Ueber algebraische Correspondenzen},
+ Vol.~31 (1888), pp.~374--409.---\textit{Ueber algebraische Correspondenzen. Zweite
+ Abhandlung: Specialgruppen von Punkten einer algebraischen Curve}, Vol.~36 (1890),
+ pp.~321--360.}
+is devoted
+to the further investigation and demonstration of this theorem.
+Now Hurwitz, attacking the problem from the point of view
+of Riemann's ideas, arrives not only at a more simple and
+quite general demonstration of Cayley's rule, but proceeds to a
+complete study of all possible algebraic correspondences. He
+finds that while for \emph{general} curves the correspondences considered
+%% -----File: 017.png---Folio 7-------
+by Cayley and Brill are the only ones that exist, in the
+case of \emph{singular} curves there are other correspondences which
+also can be treated completely. These singular curves are
+characterized by certain linear relations with integral coefficients,
+connecting the periods of their Abelian integrals.
+
+Let us now turn to that side of Clebsch's method which
+appears to me to be the most important, and which certainly
+must be recognized as being of great and permanent value;
+I mean the generalization, obtained by Clebsch, of the whole
+theory of Abelian integrals to the theory of algebraic functions
+with several variables. By applying the methods he had
+developed for functions of the form $f(x, y) = 0$, or in homogeneous
+co-ordinates, $f(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) = 0$, to functions with four
+homogeneous variables $f(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}) = 0$, he found in~1868,
+that there also exists a number~$p$ that remains invariant under
+all rational transformations of the surface $f = 0$. Clebsch
+arrives at this result by considering \emph{double integrals} belonging
+to the surface.
+
+It is evident that this theory could not have been found from
+Riemann's point of view. There is no difficulty in conceiving a
+four-dimensional Riemann space corresponding to an equation
+$f(x, y, z) = 0$. But the difficulty would lie in proving the
+``theorems of existence'' for such a space; and it may even be
+doubted whether analogous theorems hold in such a space.
+
+While to Clebsch is due the fundamental idea of this
+grand generalization, the working out of this theory was
+left to his pupils and followers. The work was mainly carried
+on by Nöther, who showed, in the case of algebraic surfaces,
+the existence of more than one invariant number~$p$ and of
+corresponding moduli, \ie\ constants not changed by one-to-one
+transformations. Italian and French mathematicians, in particular
+Picard and Poincaré, have also contributed largely to the
+further development of the theory.
+%% -----File: 018.png---Folio 8-------
+
+If the value of a man of science is to be gauged not by his
+general activity in all directions, but solely by the fruitful new
+ideas that he has first introduced into his science, then the
+theory just considered must be regarded as the most valuable
+work of Clebsch.
+
+In close connection with the preceding are the general ideas
+put forth by Clebsch in his last memoir,\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber ein neues Grundgebilde der analytischen Geometrie der Ebene}, Math.\
+ Annalen, Vol.~6 (1873), pp.~203--215.}
+ideas to which he
+himself attached great importance. This memoir implies an
+application, as it were, of the theory of Abelian functions to
+the theory of differential equations. It is well known that the
+central problem of the whole of modern mathematics is the
+study of the transcendental functions defined by differential
+equations. Now Clebsch, led by the analogy of his theory of
+Abelian integrals, proceeds somewhat as follows. Let us consider,
+for example, an ordinary differential equation of the first
+order $f(x, y, y') = 0$, where $f$~represents an algebraic function.
+Regarding~$y'$ as a third variable~$z$, we have the equation of an
+algebraic surface. Just as the Abelian integrals can be classified
+according to the properties of the fundamental curve that
+remain unchanged under a rational transformation, so Clebsch
+proposes to classify the transcendental functions defined by
+the differential equations according to the invariant properties
+of the corresponding surfaces $f = 0$ under rational one-to-one
+transformations.
+
+The theory of differential equations is just now being cultivated
+very extensively by French mathematicians; and some
+of them proceed precisely from this point of view first adopted
+by Clebsch.
+%% -----File: 019.png---Folio 9-------
+
+\Lecture{II.}{Sophus Lie.}
+
+\Date{(August 29, 1893.)}
+
+\First{To} fully understand the mathematical genius of Sophus Lie,
+one must not turn to the books recently published by him in
+collaboration with Dr.~Engel, but to his earlier memoirs, written
+during the first years of his scientific career. There Lie shows
+himself the true geometer that he is, while in his later publications,
+finding that he was but imperfectly understood by the
+mathematicians accustomed to the analytical point of view, he
+adopted a very general analytical form of treatment that is not
+always easy to follow.
+
+Fortunately, I had the advantage of becoming intimately
+acquainted with Lie's ideas at a very early period, when they
+were still, as the chemists say, in the ``nascent state,'' and
+thus most effective in producing a strong reaction. My lecture
+to-day will therefore be devoted chiefly to his paper ``\textit{Ueber
+Complexe, insbesondere Linien- und Kugel-Complexe, mit Anwendung
+auf die Theorie partieller Differentialgleichungen}.''\footnote
+ {Math.\ Annalen,\DPnote{** TN: Italicized in original} Vol.~5 (1872), pp.~145--256.}
+
+To define the place of this paper in the historical development
+of geometry, a word must be said of two eminent geometers
+of an earlier period: Plücker (1801--68) and Monge (1746--1818).
+Plücker's name is familiar to every mathematician,
+through his formulæ relating to algebraic curves. But what is
+of importance in the present connection is his generalized idea
+%% -----File: 020.png---Folio 10-------
+of the space-element. The ordinary geometry with the point as
+element deals with space as three-dimensioned, conformably to
+the three constants determining the position of a point. A dual
+transformation gives the plane as element; space in this case
+has also three dimensions, as there are three independent constants
+in the equation of the plane. If, however, the straight
+line be selected as space-element, space must be considered as
+four-dimensional, since four independent constants determine
+a straight line. Again, if a quadric surface~$F_{2}$ be taken as
+element, space will have nine dimensions, because every such
+element requires nine quantities for its determination, viz.\ the
+nine independent constants of the surface~$F_{2}$; in other words,
+space contains $\infty^{9}$~quadric surfaces. This conception of hyperspaces
+must be clearly distinguished from that of Grassmann
+and others. Plücker, indeed, rejected any other idea of a space
+of more than three dimensions as too abstruse.---The work
+of Monge that is here of importance, is his \textit{Application de
+l'analyse à la géométrie}, 1809 (reprinted 1850), in which he
+treats of ordinary and partial differential equations of the first
+and second order, and applies these to geometrical questions
+such as the curvature of surfaces, their lines of curvature,
+geodesic lines,~etc. The treatment of geometrical problems by
+means of the differential and integral calculus is one feature of
+this work; the other, perhaps even more important, is the converse
+of this, viz.\ the application of geometrical intuition to
+questions of analysis.
+
+Now this last feature is one of the most prominent characteristics
+of Lie's work; he increases its power by adopting Plücker's
+idea of a generalized space-element and extending this fundamental
+conception. A few examples will best serve to give an
+idea of the character of his work; as such an example I select
+(as I have done elsewhere before) Lie's sphere-geometry (\textit{Kugelgeometrie}).
+%% -----File: 021.png---Folio 11-------
+
+Taking the equation of a sphere in the form
+\[
+x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} - 2Bx - 2Cy - 2Dz + E = 0,
+\]
+the coefficients, $B$, $C$, $D$, $E$, can be regarded as the co-ordinates
+of the sphere, and ordinary space appears accordingly as a
+manifoldness of four dimensions. For the radius,~$R$, of the
+sphere we have
+\[
+R^{2} = B^{2} + C^{2} + D^{2} - E
+\]
+as a relation connecting the fifth quantity,~$R$, with the four co-ordinates,
+$B$, $C$, $D$,~$E$.
+
+To introduce homogeneous co-ordinates, put
+\[
+B = \frac{b}{a}, \quad C = \frac{c}{a},\quad D =\frac{d}{a},\quad E = \frac{e}{a}, \quad R = \frac{r}{a};
+\]
+then $a : b : c : d : e$ are the five homogeneous co-ordinates of the
+sphere, and the sixth quantity~$r$ is related to them by means of
+the homogeneous equation of the second degree,
+\[
+r^{2} = b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - ae.
+\Tag{(1)}
+\]
+
+Sphere-geometry has been treated in two ways that must be
+carefully distinguished. In one method, which we may call \emph{the
+elementary sphere-geometry}, only the five co-ordinates $a : b : c : d : e$
+are used, while in the other, \emph{the higher}, or \emph{Lie's}, \emph{sphere-geometry},
+the quantity~$r$ is introduced. In this latter system, a sphere
+has six homogeneous co-ordinates, $a$,~$b$,~$c$, $d$,~$e$,~$r$, connected by
+the equation~\Eq{(1)}.
+
+From a higher point of view the distinction between these
+two sphere-geometries, as well as their individual character, is
+best brought out by considering the \emph{group} belonging to each.
+Indeed, every system of geometry is characterized by its group,
+in the meaning explained in my Erlangen \textit{Programm};\DPnote{** Semicolon ital. in orig.}\footnote
+ {\textit{Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen.\ Programm
+ zum Eintritt in die philosophische Facultät und den Senat der K.~Friedrich-Alexanders-Universität
+ zu Erlangen}. Erlangen, Deichert, 1872. For an English translation,
+ by Haskell, see the Bulletin of the New York Mathematical Society, Vol.~2
+ (1893), pp.~215--249.}
+\ie\
+%% -----File: 022.png---Folio 12-------
+every system of geometry deals only with such relations of
+space as remain unchanged by the transformations of its group.
+
+In the elementary sphere-geometry the group is formed by
+all the linear substitutions of the five quantities $a$,~$b$,~$c$, $d$,~$e$,
+that leave unchanged the homogeneous equation of the second
+degree
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - ae = 0.
+\Tag{(2)}
+\]
+This gives $\infty^{25-15} = \infty^{10}$ substitutions. By adopting this definition
+we obtain point-transformations of a simple character.
+The geometrical meaning of equation~\Eq{(2)} is that the radius is
+zero. Every sphere of vanishing radius, \ie\ every point, is
+therefore transformed into a point. Moreover, as the polar
+\[
+2bb' + 2cc' + 2dd' - ae' - a'e = 0
+\]
+remains likewise unchanged in the transformation, it follows
+that orthogonal spheres are transformed into orthogonal spheres.
+Thus the group of the elementary sphere-geometry is characterized
+as the \emph{conformal group}, well known as that of the transformation
+by inversion (or reciprocal radii) and through its
+applications in mathematical physics.
+
+Darboux has further developed this elementary sphere-geometry.
+Any equation of the second degree
+\[
+F(a, b, c, d, e) = 0,
+\]
+taken in connection with the relation~\Eq{(2)} represents a point-surface
+which Darboux has called \emph{cyclide}. From the point of
+view of ordinary projective geometry, the cyclide is a surface of
+the fourth order containing the imaginary circle common to all
+spheres of space as a double curve. A careful investigation
+%% -----File: 023.png---Folio 13-------
+of these cyclides will be found in Darboux's \textit{Leçons sur la
+théorie générale des surfaces et les applications géométriques du
+calcul infinitésimal}, and elsewhere. As the ordinary surfaces of
+the second degree can be regarded as special cases of cyclides,
+we have here a method for generalizing the known properties
+of quadric surfaces by extending them to cyclides. Thus Mr.\
+M.~Bôcher, of Harvard University, in his dissertation,\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Reihenentwickelungen der Potentialtheorie}, gekrönte Preisschrift,
+ Göttingen, Dieterich,~1891.}
+has
+treated the extension of a problem in the theory of the potential
+from the known case of a body bounded by surfaces of
+the second degree to a body bounded by cyclides. A more
+extended publication on this subject by Mr.~Bôcher will appear
+in a few months (Leipzig, Teubner).
+
+In the higher sphere-geometry of Lie, the six homogeneous
+co-ordinates $a : b : c : d : e : r$ are connected, as mentioned above,
+by the homogeneous equation of the second degree,
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - r^{2} - ae = 0.
+\]
+
+The corresponding group is selected as the group of the
+linear substitutions transforming this equation into itself. We
+have thus a group of $\infty^{36-21} = \infty^{15}$ substitutions. But this is
+not a group of point-transformations; for a sphere of radius
+zero becomes a sphere whose radius is in general different from
+zero. Thus, putting for instance
+\[
+B' = B,\quad C' = C,\quad D' = D,\quad E' = E,\quad R' = R + \text{const.},
+\]
+it appears that the transformation consists in a mere dilatation
+or expansion of each sphere, a point becoming a sphere of
+given radius.
+
+The meaning of the polar equation
+\[
+2bb' + 2cc' + 2dd' - 2rr' - ae' - a'e = 0
+\]
+%% -----File: 024.png---Folio 14-------
+remaining invariant for any transformation of the group, is evidently
+that the spheres originally in contact remain in contact.
+The group belongs therefore to the important class of \emph{contact-transformations},
+which will soon be considered more in detail.
+
+In studying any particular geometry, such as Lie's sphere-geometry,
+two methods present themselves.
+
+(1)~We may consider equations of various degrees and inquire
+what they represent. In devising names for the different configurations
+so obtained, Lie used the names introduced by
+Plücker in his line-geometry. Thus a single equation,
+\[
+F(a, b, c, d, e, r) = 0,
+\]
+is said to represent a \emph{complex} of the first, second,~etc., degree,
+according to the degree of the equation; a complex contains,
+therefore, $\infty^{3}$~spheres. Two such equations,
+\[
+F_{1} = 0,\quad F_{2} = 0,
+\]
+represent a \emph{congruency} containing $\infty^{2}$~spheres. Three equations,
+\[
+F_{1} = 0,\quad F_{2} = 0,\quad F_{3} = 0,
+\]
+may be said to represent a \emph{set} of spheres, the number being~$\infty^{1}$.
+It is to be noticed that in each case the equation of the second
+degree,
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - r^{2} - ae = 0,
+\]
+is understood to be combined with the equation $F = 0$.
+
+It may be well to mention expressly that the same names are
+used by other authors in the elementary sphere-geometry, where
+their meaning is, of course, different.
+
+(2)~The other method of studying a new geometry consists
+in inquiring how the ordinary configurations of point-geometry
+can be treated by means of the new system. This line of
+inquiry has led Lie to highly interesting results.
+%% -----File: 025.png---Folio 15-------
+
+In ordinary geometry a surface is conceived as a locus of
+points; in Lie's geometry it appears as the totality of all the
+spheres having contact with the surface. This gives a threefold
+infinity of spheres, or a complex of spheres,
+\[
+F(a, b, c, d, e, r) = 0.
+\]
+But this, of course, is not a \emph{general} complex; for not every complex
+will be such as to touch a surface. It has been shown
+that the condition that must be fulfilled by a complex of
+spheres, if all its spheres are to touch a surface, is the following:
+\[
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd b}\right)^{2} +
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd c}\right)^{2} +
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd d}\right)^{2} -
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd r}\right)^{2} - \frac{\dd F}{\dd a}\, \frac{\dd F}{\dd e} = 0.
+\]
+
+To give at least one illustration of the further development of
+this interesting theory, I will mention that among the infinite
+number of spheres touching the surface at any point there are
+two having stationary contact with the surface; they are called
+the \emph{principal spheres}. The lines of curvature of the surface
+can then be defined as curves along which the principal spheres
+touch the surface in two successive points.
+
+Plücker's line-geometry can be studied by the same two
+methods just mentioned. In this geometry let $p_{12}$, $p_{13}$, $p_{14}$, $p_{34}$,
+$p_{42}$, $p_{23}$ be the usual six homogeneous co-ordinates, where
+$p_{ik} = -p_{ki}$. Then we have the identity
+\[
+p_{12}p_{34} + p_{13}p_{42} + p_{14}p_{23} = 0,
+\]
+and we take as group the $\infty^{15}$ linear substitutions transforming
+this equation into itself. This group corresponds to the totality
+of collineations and reciprocations, \ie\ to the projective group.
+The reason for this lies in the fact that the polar equation
+\[
+p_{12}{p_{34}}' + p_{13}{p_{42}}' + p_{14}{p_{23}}' +
+p_{34}{p_{12}}' + p_{42}{p_{13}}' + p_{23}{p_{14}}' = 0
+\]
+expresses the intersection of the two lines~$p$,~$p'$.
+%% -----File: 026.png---Folio 16-------
+
+Now Lie has instituted a comparison of the highest interest
+between the line-geometry of Plücker and his own sphere-geometry.
+In each of these geometries there occur six homogeneous
+co-ordinates connected by a homogeneous equation of
+the second degree. The discriminant of each equation is different
+from zero. It follows that we can pass from either of these
+geometries to the other by linear substitutions. Thus, to transform
+\[
+p_{12}p_{34} + p_{13}p_{42} + p_{14}p_{23} = 0
+\]
+into
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - r^{2} - ae = 0,
+\]
+it is sufficient to assume, say,
+\begin{alignat*}{3}
+p_{12} &= b + ic,\quad & p_{13} &= d + r,\quad & p_{14} &= -a, \\
+p_{34} &= b - ic,\quad & p_{42} &= d - r,\quad & p_{23} &= e.
+\end{alignat*}
+It follows from the linear character of the substitutions that
+the polar equations are likewise transformed into each other.
+Thus we have the remarkable result that \emph{two spheres that touch
+correspond to two lines that intersect}.
+
+It is worthy of notice that the equations of transformation
+involve the imaginary unit~$i$; and the law of inertia of quadratic
+forms shows at once that this introduction of the imaginary
+cannot be avoided, but is essential.
+
+To illustrate the value of this transformation of line-geometry
+into sphere-geometry, and \textit{vice versa}, let us consider three
+linear equations,
+\[
+F_{1} = 0,\quad F_{2} = 0,\quad F_{3} = 0,
+\]
+the variables being either line co-ordinates or sphere co-ordinates.
+In the former case the three equations represent a \emph{set
+of lines}; \ie\ one of the two sets of straight lines of a hyperboloid
+of one sheet. It is well known that each line of either
+set intersects all the lines of the other. Transforming to sphere-geometry,
+%% -----File: 027.png---Folio 17-------
+we obtain a \emph{set of spheres} corresponding to each
+set of lines; and every sphere of either set must touch every
+sphere of the other set. This gives a configuration well
+known in geometry from other investigations; viz.\ all these
+spheres envelop a surface known as Dupin's cyclide. We
+have thus found a noteworthy correlation between the hyperboloid
+of one sheet and Dupin's cyclide.
+
+Perhaps the most striking example of the fruitfulness of this
+work of Lie's is his discovery that by means of this transformation
+the lines of curvature of a surface are transformed into
+asymptotic lines of the transformed surface, and \textit{vice versa}.
+This appears by taking the definition given above for the lines
+of curvature and translating it word for word into the language
+of line-geometry. Two problems in the infinitesimal geometry
+of surfaces, that had long been regarded as entirely distinct,
+are thus shown to be really identical. This must certainly be
+regarded as one of the most elegant contributions to differential
+geometry made in recent times.
+%% -----File: 028.png---Folio 18-------
+
+\Lecture{III.}{Sophus Lie.}
+
+\Date{(August 30, 1893.)}
+
+\First{The} distinction between analytic and algebraic functions,
+so important in pure analysis, enters also into the treatment
+of geometry.
+
+\emph{Analytic} functions are those that can be represented by a
+power series, convergent within a certain region bounded by
+the so-called circle of convergence. Outside of this region
+the analytic function is not regarded as given \textit{a~priori}; its
+continuation into wider regions remains a matter of special
+investigation and may give very different results, according to
+the particular case considered.
+
+On the other hand, an \emph{algebraic} function, $w = \text{Alg.}\,(z)$, is
+supposed to be known for the whole complex plane, having a
+finite number of values for every value of~$z$.
+
+Similarly, in geometry, we may confine our attention to a
+limited portion of an analytic curve or surface, as, for instance,
+in constructing the tangent, investigating the curvature,~etc.;
+or we may have to consider the whole extent of algebraic curves
+and surfaces in space.
+
+Almost the whole of the applications of the differential and
+integral calculus to geometry belongs to the former branch of
+geometry; and as this is what we are mainly concerned with in
+the present lecture, we need not restrict ourselves to algebraic
+functions, but may use the more general analytic functions
+confining ourselves always to limited portions of space. I
+%% -----File: 029.png---Folio 19-------
+thought it advisable to state this here once for all, since here in
+America the consideration of algebraic curves has perhaps been
+too predominant.
+
+The possibility of introducing new elements of space has been
+pointed out in the preceding lecture. To-day we shall use again
+a new space-element, consisting of an infinitesimal portion of a
+surface (or rather of its tangent plane) with a definite point in
+it. This is called, though not very properly, a \emph{surface-element}
+(\emph{Flächenelement}), and may perhaps be likened to an infinitesimal
+fish-scale. From a more abstract point of view it may be
+defined as simply the combination of a plane with a point in it.
+
+As the equation of a plane passing through a point~$(x, y, z)$
+can be written in the form
+\[
+z' - z = p(x' - x) + q(y' - y),
+\]
+$x'$,~$y'$,~$z'$ being the current co-ordinates, we have $x$,~$y$,~$z$, $p$,~$q$ as the
+co-ordinates of our surface-element, so that space becomes a
+fivefold manifoldness. If homogeneous co-ordinates be used,
+the point $(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4})$ and the plane $(u_{1}, u_{2}, u_{3}, u_{4})$ passing
+through it are connected by the condition
+\[
+x_{1}u_{1} + x_{2}u_{2} + x_{3}u_{3} + x_{4}u_{4} = 0,
+\]
+expressing their united position; and the number of independent
+constants is $3 + 3 - 1 = 5$, as before.
+
+Let us now see how ordinary geometry appears in this
+representation. A point, being the locus of all surface-elements
+passing through it, is represented as a manifoldness of two
+dimensions, let us say for shortness, an~$M_{2}$. A curve is represented
+by the totality of all those surface-elements that have
+their point on the curve and their plane passing through the
+tangent; these elements form again an~$M_{2}$. Finally, a surface
+is given by those surface-elements that have their point on the
+%% -----File: 030.png---Folio 20-------
+surface and their plane coincident with the tangent plane of the
+surface; they, too, form an~$M_{2}$.
+
+Moreover, all these~$M_{2}$'s have an important property in
+common: any two consecutive surface-elements belonging to
+the same point, curve, or surface always satisfy the condition
+\[
+dz - p\, dx - q\, dy = 0,
+\]
+which is a simple case of a Pfaffian relation; and conversely, if
+two surface-elements satisfy this condition, they belong to the
+same point, curve, or surface, as the case may be.
+
+Thus we have the highly interesting result that in the geometry
+of surface-elements points as well as curves and surfaces are
+brought under one head, being all represented by twofold manifoldnesses
+having the property just explained. This definition
+is the more important as there are no other~$M_{2}$'s having the
+same property.
+
+We now proceed to consider the very general kind of transformations
+called by Lie \emph{contact-transformations}. They are
+transformations that change our element $(x, y, z, p, q)$ into
+$(x', y', z', p', q')$ by such substitutions
+\[
+x' = \phi (x, y, z, p, q),\
+y' = \psi (x, y, z, p, q),\
+z' = \cdots,\
+p' = \cdots,\
+q' = \cdots,
+\]
+as will transform into itself the linear differential equation
+\[
+dz - p\, dx - q\, dy = 0.
+\]
+The geometrical meaning of the transformation is evidently that
+any~$M_{2}$ having the given property is changed into an~$M_{2}$ having
+the same property. Thus, for instance, a surface is transformed
+generally into a surface, or in special cases into a point or a
+curve. Moreover, let us consider two manifoldnesses~$M_{2}$ having
+a contact, \ie\ having a surface-element in common; these~$M_{2}$'s
+are changed by the transformation into two other~$M_{2}$'s having
+%% -----File: 031.png---Folio 21-------
+also a contact. From this characteristic the name given by
+Lie to the transformation will be understood.
+
+Contact-transformations are so important, and occur so frequently,
+that particular cases attracted the attention of geometers
+long ago, though not under this name and from this point
+of view, \ie\ not as contact-transformations, so that the true
+insight into their nature could not be obtained.
+
+Numerous examples of contact-transformations are given
+in my (lithographed) lectures on \textit{Höhere Geometrie}, delivered
+during the winter-semester of 1892--93. Thus, an example
+in two dimensions is found in the problem of wheel-gearing.
+The outline of the tooth of one wheel being given, it is here
+required to find the outline of the tooth of the other wheel,
+as I explained to you in my lecture at the Chicago Exhibition,
+with the aid of the models in the German university exhibit.
+
+Another example is found in the theory of perturbations in
+astronomy; Lagrange's method of variation of parameters as
+applied to the problem of three bodies is equivalent to a
+contact-transformation in a higher space.
+
+The group of $\infty^{15}$~substitutions considered yesterday in
+line-geometry is also a group of contact-transformations, both
+the collineations and reciprocations having this character.
+The reciprocations give the first well-known instance of the
+transformation of a point into a plane (\ie\ a surface), and a
+curve into a developable (\ie\ also a surface). These transformations
+of curves will here be considered as transforming
+the \emph{elements} of the points or curves into the \emph{elements} of the
+surface.
+
+Finally, we have examples of contact-transformations, not
+only in the transformations of spheres discussed in the last
+lecture, but even in the general transition from the line-geometry
+of Plücker to the sphere-geometry of Lie. Let us
+consider this last case somewhat more in detail.
+%% -----File: 032.png---Folio 22-------
+
+First of all, two lines that intersect have, of course, a
+surface-element in common; and as the two corresponding
+spheres must also have a surface-element in common, they
+will be in contact, as is actually the case for our transformation.
+It will be of interest to consider more closely the correlation
+between the surface-elements of a line and those of a sphere,
+although it is given by imaginary formulæ. Take, for instance,
+the totality of the surface-elements belonging to a circle on
+one of the spheres; we may call this a \emph{circular set} of elements.
+In line-geometry there corresponds the set of surface-elements
+along a generating line of a skew surface; and so on. The
+theorem regarding the transformation of the curves of curvature
+into asymptotic lines becomes now self-evident. Instead
+of the curve of curvature of a surface we have here to consider
+the corresponding elements of the surface which we may
+call a \emph{curvature set}. Similarly, an asymptotic line is replaced
+by the elements of the surface along this line; to this the name
+\emph{osculating set} may be given. The correspondence between the
+two sets is brought out immediately by considering that two
+consecutive elements of a curvature set belong to the same
+sphere, while two consecutive elements of an osculating set
+belong to the same straight line.
+
+One of the most important applications of contact-transformations
+is found in the theory of partial differential equations;
+I shall here confine myself to partial differential equations of
+the first order. From our new point of view, this theory
+assumes a much higher degree of perspicuity, and the true
+meaning of the terms ``solution,'' ``general solution,'' ``complete
+solution,'' ``singular solution,'' introduced by Lagrange
+and Monge, is brought out with much greater clearness.
+
+Let us consider the partial differential equation of the first
+order
+\[
+f(x, y, z, p, q) = 0.
+\]
+%% -----File: 033.png---Folio 23-------
+In the older theory, a distinction is made according to the way
+in which $p$~and~$q$ enter into the equation. Thus, when $p$ and~$q$
+enter only in the first degree, the equation is called linear.
+If $p$ and~$q$ should happen to be both absent, the equation would
+not be regarded as a differential equation at all. From the
+higher point of view of Lie's new geometry, this distinction
+disappears entirely, as will be seen in what follows.
+
+The number of all surface elements in the whole of space is
+of course~$\infty^{5}$. By writing down our equation we single out
+from these a manifoldness of four dimensions,~$M_{4}$, of $\infty^{4}$~elements.
+Now, to find a ``solution'' of the equation in Lie's
+sense means to single out from this~$M_{4}$ a twofold manifoldness,~$M_{2}$,
+of the characteristic property; whether this~$M_{2}$ be a point,
+a curve, or a surface, is here regarded as indifferent. What
+Lagrange calls finding a ``complete solution'' consists in
+dividing the~$M_{4}$ into $\infty^{2}$~$M_{2}$'s. This can of course be done
+in an infinite number of ways. Finally, if any singly infinite
+set be taken out of the $\infty^{2}$~$M_{2}$'s, we have in the envelope of
+this set what Lagrange calls a ``general solution.'' These
+formulations hold quite generally for \emph{all} partial differential
+equations of the first order, even for the most specialized forms.
+
+To illustrate, by an example, in what sense an equation of
+the form $f(x, y, z) = 0$ may be regarded as a partial differential
+equation and what is the meaning of its solutions, let
+us consider the very special case $z = 0$. While in ordinary
+co-ordinates this equation represents all the \emph{points} of the $xy$-plane,
+in Lie's system it represents of course all the \emph{surface-elements}
+whose points lie in the plane. Nothing is so simple
+as to assign a ``complete solution'' in this case; we have only
+to take the $\infty^{2}$~points of the plane themselves, each point being
+an~$M_{2}$ of the equation. To derive from this the ``general solution,''
+we must take all possible singly infinite sets of points
+in the plane, \ie\ any curve whatever, and form the envelope
+%% -----File: 034.png---Folio 24-------
+of the surface-elements belonging to the points; in other words,
+we must take the elements touching the curve. Finally, the
+plane itself represents of course a ``singular solution.''
+
+Now, the very high interest and importance of this simple
+illustration lies in the fact that by a contact-transformation
+every partial differential equation of the first order can be
+changed into this particular form $z = 0$. Hence the whole disposition
+of the solutions outlined above holds quite generally.
+
+A new and deeper insight is thus gained through Lie's
+theory into the meaning of problems that have long been
+regarded as classical, while at the same time a full array of
+new problems is brought to light and finds here its answer.
+
+It can here only be briefly mentioned that Lie has done much
+in applying similar principles to the theory of partial differential
+equations of the second order.
+
+At the present time Lie is best known through his theory of
+continuous groups of transformations, and at first glance it
+might appear as if there were but little connection between this
+theory and the geometrical considerations that engaged our
+attention in the last two lectures. I think it therefore desirable
+to point out here this connection. \emph{It has been the final
+aim of Lie from the beginning to make progress in the theory
+of differential equations}; and as subsidiary to this end may be
+regarded both the geometrical developments considered in these
+lectures and the theory of continuous groups.
+
+For further particulars concerning the subjects of the present
+as well as the two preceding lectures, I may refer to my (lithographed)
+lectures on \textit{Höhere Geometrie}, delivered at Göttingen,
+in 1892--93. The theory of surface-elements is also fully developed
+in the second volume of the \textit{Theorie der Transformationsgruppen},
+by Lie and Engel (Leipzig, Teubner, 1890).
+%% -----File: 035.png---Folio 25-------
+
+\Lecture[Algebraic Curves and Surfaces.]
+{IV.}{On the Real Shape of Algebraic
+Curves and Surfaces.}
+
+\Date{(August 31, 1893.)}
+
+\First{We} turn now to \emph{algebraic} functions, and in particular to the
+question of the actual geometric forms corresponding to such
+functions. The question as to the reality of geometric forms
+and the actual shape of algebraic curves and surfaces was somewhat
+neglected for a long time. Otherwise it would be difficult
+to explain, for instance, why the connection between Cayley's
+theory of projective measurement and the non-Euclidean geometry
+should not have been perceived at once. As these questions
+are even now less well known than they deserve to be, I
+proceed to give here an historical sketch of the subject, without,
+however, attempting completeness.
+
+It must be counted among the lasting merits of Sir~Isaac
+Newton that he first investigated the shape of the plane curves
+of the third order. His \textit{Enumeratio linearum tertii ordinis}\footnote
+ {First published as an appendix to Newton's \textit{Opticks}, 1704.}
+shows that he had a very clear conception of projective
+geometry; for he says that all curves of the third order can
+be derived by central projection from five fundamental types
+(\Fig{1}). But I wish to direct your particular attention to the
+paper by Möbius, \textit{Ueber die Grundformen der Linien der dritten
+Ordnung},\footnote
+ {Abhandlungen der Königl.\ Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, math.-phys.\
+ Klasse, Vol.~I (1852), pp.~1--82; reprinted in Möbius' \textit{Gesammelte Werke},
+ Vol.~III (1886), pp.~89--176.}
+where the forms of the cubic curves are derived by
+%% -----File: 036.png---Folio 26-------
+purely geometric considerations. Owing to its remarkable
+elegance of treatment, this paper has given the impulse to
+all the subsequent researches in this line that I shall have
+to mention.
+
+In 1872 we considered, in Göttingen, the question as to the
+shape of surfaces of the third order. As a particular case,
+Clebsch at this time constructed his beautiful model of the
+%[Illustration: Fig.~1.]
+\Figure{036}
+\emph{diagonal surface}, with $27$~real lines, which I showed to you at
+the Exhibition. The equation of this surface may be written
+in the simple form
+\[
+\sum_{1}^{5}x_{i} = 0,\quad \sum_{1}^{5}x^{3}_{i} = 0,
+\]
+which shows that the surface can be transformed into itself by
+the $120$~permutations of the~$x$'s.
+
+It may here be mentioned as a general rule, that in selecting
+a particular case for constructing a model the first prerequisite
+is regularity. By selecting a symmetrical form for
+the model, not only is the execution simplified, but what is of
+more importance, the model will be of such a character as to
+impress itself readily on the mind.
+
+Instigated by this investigation of Clebsch, I turned to the
+general problem of determining all possible forms of cubic surfaces.\footnote
+ {See my paper \textit{Ueber Flächen dritter Ordnung}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~6 (1873),
+ pp.~551--581.}
+%% -----File: 037.png---Folio 27-------
+I established the fact that by the principle of continuity
+all forms of real surfaces of the third order can be derived
+from the particular surface having four real conical points.
+This surface, also, I exhibited to you at the World's Fair, and
+pointed out how the diagonal surface can be derived from it.
+But what is of primary importance is the completeness of
+enumeration resulting from my point of view; it would be of
+comparatively little value to derive any number of special forms
+if it cannot be proved that the method used exhausts the
+subject. Models of the typical cases of all the principal forms
+of cubic surfaces have since been constructed by Rodenberg for
+Brill's collection.
+
+In the 7th~volume of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1874) Zeuthen\footnote
+ {\textit{Sur les différentes formes des courbes planes du quatrième ordre}, pp.~410--432.}
+has
+discussed the various forms of plane curves of the fourth order~$(C_{4})$.
+He
+%[Illustration: Fig.~2.]
+\WFigure{1.25in}{037}
+considers in particular the reality
+of the double tangents on these curves. The
+number of such tangents is~$28$, and they are
+all real when the curve consists of four separate
+closed portions (\Fig{2}). What is of particular
+interest is the relation of Zeuthen's
+researches on quartic curves to my own researches
+on cubic surfaces, as explained by
+Zeuthen himself.\footnote
+ {\textit{Études des propriétés de situation des surfaces cubiques}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~8
+ (1875), pp.~1--30.}
+It had been observed before, by Geiser, that
+if a cubic surface be projected on a plane from a point on the
+surface, the contour of the projection is a quartic curve, and
+that every quartic curve can be generated in this way. If a
+surface with four conical points be chosen, the resulting quartic
+has four double points; that is, it breaks up into two conics
+%% -----File: 038.png---Folio 28-------
+(\Fig{3}). By considering the shaded portions in the figure it
+will readily be seen how, by the principle of continuity, the four
+ovals of the quartic (\Fig{2}) are obtained. This corresponds
+exactly to the derivation of the diagonal
+surface from the cubic surface having four
+conical points.
+
+The attempts to extend this application
+of the principle of continuity so as to gain
+an insight into the shape of curves of the
+$n$th~order have hitherto proved futile, as
+far as a general classification and an enumeration
+of all fundamental forms is concerned. Still, some
+important results have been obtained. A paper by Harnack\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Vieltheiligkeit der ebenen algebraischen Curven}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~10
+ (1876), pp.~189--198.}
+and a more recent
+%[Illustration: Fig.~3.]
+\WFigure{1.5in}{038}
+one by Hilbert\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die reellen Züge algebraischer Curven}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~38 (1891),
+ pp.~115--138.}
+are here to be mentioned.
+Harnack finds that, if $p$~be the deficiency of the curve, the
+maximum number of separate branches the curve can have is~$p + 1$;
+and a curve with $p + 1$~branches actually exists. Hilbert's
+paper contains a large number of interesting special
+results which from their nature cannot be included in the
+present brief summary.
+
+I myself have found a curious relation between the numbers
+of real singularities.\footnote
+ {\textit{Eine neue Relation zwischen den Singularitäten einer algebraischen Curve},
+ Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~10 (1876), pp.~199--209.}
+Denoting the order of the curve by~$n$,
+the class by~$k$, and considering only simple singularities, we
+may have three kinds of double points, say $d'$~ordinary and $d''$~isolated
+real double points, besides imaginary double points;
+then there may be $r'$~real cusps, besides imaginary cusps; and
+similarly, by the principle of duality, $t'$~ordinary, $t''$~isolated
+%% -----File: 039.png---Folio 29-------
+real double tangents, besides imaginary double tangents; also
+$w'$~real inflexions, besides imaginary inflexions. Then it can
+be proved by means of the principle of continuity, that the
+following relation must hold:
+\[
+n + w' + 2t'' = k + r' + 2d''.
+\]
+
+This general law contains everything that is known as to
+curves of the third or fourth orders. It has been somewhat
+extended in a more algebraic sense by several writers. Moreover,
+Brill, in Vol.~16 of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1880),\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Singularitäten ebener algebraischer Curven und eine neue Curvenspecies},
+ pp.~348--408.}
+has shown
+how the formula must be modified when higher singularities are
+involved.
+
+As regards quartic surfaces, Rohn has investigated an enormous
+number of special cases; but a complete enumeration he
+has not
+%[Illustration: Fig.~4.]
+\WFigure{1.5in}{039}
+reached. Among the special
+surfaces of the fourth order the Kummer
+surface with $16$~conical points is
+one of the most important. The
+models constructed by Plücker in
+connection with his theory of complexes
+of lines all represent special
+cases of the Kummer surface. Some
+types of this surface are also included
+in the Brill collection. But all these
+models are now of less importance,
+since Rohn found the following interesting
+and comprehensive result.
+Imagine a quadric surface with four generating lines of each set
+(\Fig{4}). According to the character of the surface and the
+reality, non-reality, or coincidence of these lines, a large number
+of special cases is possible; all these cases, however, must be
+%% -----File: 040.png---Folio 30-------
+treated alike. We may here confine ourselves to the case of
+an hyperboloid of one sheet with four distinct lines of each
+set. These lines divide the surface into $16$~regions. Shading
+the alternate regions as in the figure, and regarding the shaded
+regions as double, the unshaded regions being disregarded, we
+have a surface consisting of eight separate closed portions hanging
+together only at the points of intersection of the lines; and
+this is a Kummer surface with $16$~real double points. Rohn's
+researches on the Kummer surface will be found in the \textit{Math.\
+Annalen}, Vol.~18 (1881);\footnote
+ {\textit{Die verschiedenen Gestalten der Kummer'schen Fläche}, pp.~99--159.}
+his more general investigations on
+quartic surfaces, \textit{ib}., Vol.~29 (1887).\footnote
+ {\textit{Die Flächen vierter Ordnung hinsichtlich ihrer Knotenpunkte und ihrer Gestaltung},
+ pp.~81--96.}
+
+There is still another mode of dealing with the shape of
+curves (not of surfaces), viz.\ by means of the theory of Riemann.
+The first problem that here presents itself is to establish
+the connection between a plane curve and a Riemann surface,
+as I have done in Vol.~7 of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1874).\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber eine neue Art der Riemann'schen Flächen}, pp.~558--566.}
+Let us consider a cubic curve; its deficiency is $p = 1$. Now it
+is well known that in Riemann's theory this deficiency is a
+measure of the connectivity of the corresponding Riemann surface,
+which, therefore, in the present case, must be that of a
+\emph{tore}, or anchor-ring. The question then arises: what has the
+anchor-ring to do with the cubic curve? The connection will
+best be understood by considering the curve of the third \emph{class}
+whose shape is represented in \Fig{5}. It is easy to see that of
+%[Illustration: Fig.~5.] [** TN: Moved up one paragraph]
+\Figure[1.75in]{041}
+the three tangents that can be drawn to this curve from any
+point in its plane, all three will be real if the point be selected
+outside the oval branch, or inside the triangular branch; but that
+only one of the three tangents will be real for any point in the
+shaded region, while the other two tangents are imaginary. As
+%% -----File: 041.png---Folio 31-------
+there are thus two imaginary tangents corresponding to each
+point of this region, let us imagine it covered with a double
+leaf; along the curve the two leaves must, of course, be
+regarded as joined. Thus we obtain a surface which can be
+considered as a Riemann surface belonging to the curve, each
+point of the surface corresponding to a single tangent of the
+curve. Here, then, we have our anchor-ring. If on such a surface
+we study integrals, they will be of double periodicity, and
+the true reason is thus disclosed for the connection of elliptic
+integrals with the curves of the third class, and hence, owing
+to the relation of duality, with the curves of the third order.
+
+To make a further advance, I passed to the general theory
+of Riemann surfaces. To real curves will of course correspond
+\emph{symmetrical} Riemann surfaces, \ie\ surfaces that reproduce
+themselves by a conformal transformation of the second kind
+(\ie\ a transformation that inverts the sense of the angles).
+Now it is easy to enumerate the different symmetrical types
+belonging to a given~$p$. The result is that there are altogether
+$p+1$~``diasymmetric'' and $\left[\dfrac{p+1}{2}\right]$~``orthosymmetric'' cases.
+If we denote as a line of symmetry any line whose points
+%% -----File: 042.png---Folio 32-------
+remain unchanged by the conformal transformation, the diasymmetric
+cases contain respectively $p$, $p-1$,~$\dots$ $2$,~$1$,~$0$ lines
+of symmetry, and the orthosymmetric cases contain $p+1$,~$p-1$,
+$p-3$,~$\dots$ such lines. A surface is called diasymmetric or orthosymmetric
+according as it does not or does break up into two
+parts by cuts carried along all the lines of symmetry. This
+enumeration, then, will contain a general classification of real
+curves, as indicated first in my pamphlet on Riemann's theory.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Riemann's Theorie der algebraischen Functionen und ihrer Integrale},
+ Leipzig, Teubner, 1882. An English translation by Frances Hardcastle (London,
+ Macmillan) has just appeared.}
+In the summer of 1892 I resumed the theory and developed
+a large number of propositions concerning the reality of the
+roots of those equations connected with our curves that can be
+treated by means of the Abelian integrals. Compare the last
+volume of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Realitätsverhältnisse bei der einem beliebigen Geschlechte zugehörigen
+ Normalcurve der~$\phi$}, Vol.~42 (1893), pp.~1--29.}
+and my (lithographed) lectures
+on \textit{Riemann'sche Flächen}, Part~II\@.
+
+In the same manner in which we have to-day considered
+ordinary algebraic curves and surfaces, it would be interesting
+to investigate \emph{all} algebraic configurations so as to arrive at a
+truly geometrical intuition of these objects.
+
+In concluding, I wish to insist in particular on what I regard
+as the principal characteristic of the geometrical methods that I
+have discussed to-day: these methods give us an \emph{actual mental
+image} of the configuration under discussion, and this I consider
+as most essential in all true geometry. For this reason the
+so-called synthetic methods, as usually developed, do not appear
+to me very satisfactory. While giving elaborate constructions
+for special cases and details they fail entirely to afford a general
+view of the configurations as a whole.
+%% -----File: 043.png---Folio 33-------
+
+\Lecture{V.}{Theory of Functions and
+Geometry.}
+
+\Date{(September 1, 1893.)}
+
+\First{A geometrical} representation of a function of a complex
+variable $w = f(z)$, where $w = u + iv$ and $z = x + iy$, can be obtained
+by constructing models of the two surfaces $u = \phi (x, y)$,
+$v = \psi (x, y)$. This idea is realized in the models constructed
+by Dyck, which I have shown to you at the Exhibition.
+
+Another well-known method, proposed by Riemann, consists
+in representing each of the two complex variables in the usual
+way in a plane. To every point in the $z$-plane will correspond
+one or more points in the $w$-plane; as $z$~moves in its plane, $w$~describes
+a corresponding curve in the other plane. I may
+refer to the work of Holzmüller\footnote
+ {\textit{Einführung in die Theorie der isogonalen Verwandtschaften und der conformen
+ Abbildungen, verbunden mit Anwendungen auf mathematische Physik}, Leipzig,
+ Teubner, 1882.}
+as a good elementary introduction
+to this subject, especially on account of the large
+number of special cases there worked out and illustrated by
+drawings.
+
+In higher investigations, what is of interest is not so much
+the corresponding curves as corresponding areas or \emph{regions}
+of the two planes. According to Riemann's fundamental
+theorem concerning conformal representation, two simply connected
+regions can always be made to correspond to each other
+conformally, so that either is the conformal representation
+%% -----File: 044.png---Folio 34-------
+(\textit{Abbildung}) of the other. The three constants at our disposal
+in this correspondence allow us to select three arbitrary points
+on the boundary of one region as corresponding to three arbitrary
+points on the boundary of the other region. Thus
+Riemann's theory affords a geometrical definition for any function
+whatever by means of its conformal representation.
+
+This suggests the inquiry as to what conclusions can be
+drawn from this method concerning the nature of transcendental
+functions. Next to the elementary transcendental functions
+the elliptic functions are usually regarded as the most
+important. There is, however, another class for which at
+least equal importance must be claimed on account of their
+numerous applications in astronomy and mathematical physics;
+these are the \emph{hypergeometric functions}, so called owing to their
+connection with Gauss's hypergeometric series.
+
+The hypergeometric functions can be defined as the integrals
+of the following linear differential equation of the second order:
+\begin{multline*}
+\frac{d^{2}w}{dz^{2}}
+ + \biggl[\frac{1 - \lambda' - \lambda''}{z - a} (a - b)(a - c)
+ + \frac{1 - \mu' - \mu''}{z - b} (b - c)(b - a) \\
+ + \frac{1 - \nu' - \nu'' }{z - c } (c - a)(c - b)\biggr] \frac{dw}{dz}
+ + \biggl[\frac{\lambda' \lambda'' (a - b)(a - c)}{z - a} \\
+ + \frac{\mu' \mu'' (b - c)(b - a)}{z - b}
+ + \frac{\nu' \nu'' (c - a)(c - b)}{z - c}\biggr]
+ \frac{w}{(z - a)(z - b)(z - c)}= 0,
+\end{multline*}
+where~$z = a$, $b$,~$c$ are the three singular points and $\lambda'$,~$\lambda''$; $\mu'$,~$\mu''$;
+$\nu'$,~$\nu''$ are the so-called exponents belonging respectively to
+$a$,~$b$,~$c$.
+
+If $w_{1}$~be a particular solution, $w_{2}$~another, the general solution
+can be put in the form $\alpha w_{1} + \beta w_{2}$, where $\alpha$,~$\beta$ are arbitrary constants;
+so that
+\[
+\alpha w_{1} + \beta w_{2}\quad \text{and}\quad \gamma w_{1} + \delta w_{2}
+\]
+represent a pair of general solutions.
+%% -----File: 045.png---Folio 35-------
+
+If we now introduce the quotient $\dfrac{w_{1}}{w_{2}} = \eta (z)$ as a new variable,
+its most general value is
+% [** TN: Inline equation in original]
+\[
+\frac{\alpha w_{1} + \beta w_{2}}{\gamma w_{1} + \delta w_{2}} =
+\frac{\alpha\eta + \beta}{\gamma\eta + \delta}
+\]
+and contains therefore
+three arbitrary constants. Hence $\eta$~satisfies a differential
+equation of the third order which is readily found to be
+\begin{multline*}
+\frac{\eta'''}{\eta'} - \tfrac{3}{2} \left(\frac{\eta''}{\eta'}\right)^{2}\\
+ = \frac{1}{(z - a)(z - b)(z - c)}
+ \Biggl[\frac{\ \dfrac{1 - \lambda^{2}}{2}\ }{z - a} (a - b)(a - c)
+ + \frac{\ \dfrac{1 - \mu^{2}}{2}\ }{z - b} (b - c)(b - a)\\
+ + \frac{\ \dfrac{1 - \nu^{2}}{2}\ }{z - c} (c - a)(c - b)\Biggr],
+\end{multline*}
+in which the left-hand member has the property of not being
+changed by a linear substitution, and is therefore called a differential
+invariant. Cayley has named this function the Schwarzian
+derivative; it has formed the starting-point for Sylvester's
+investigations on reciprocants. In the right-hand member,
+\[
+±\lambda = \lambda' - \lambda'', \quad ±\mu = \mu' - \mu'', \quad ±\nu = \nu' - \nu''.
+\]
+
+As to the conformal representation (\Fig{6}), it can be shown
+that the upper half of the $z$-plane, with the points $a$,~$b$,~$c$ on
+%[Illustration: Fig.~6.]
+\Figure{045}
+the real axis and $\lambda$,~$\mu$,~$\nu$ assumed as real, is transformed for each
+branch of the $\eta$-function into a triangular area~$abc$ bounded by
+%% -----File: 046.png---Folio 36-------
+three circular arcs; let us call such an area a \emph{circular triangle}
+(\emph{Kreisbogendreieck}). The angles at the vertices of this triangle
+are $\lambda\pi$,~$\mu\pi$,~$\nu\pi$.
+
+This, then, is the geometrical representation we have to
+take as our basis. In order to derive from it conclusions as
+to the nature of the transcendental functions defined by the
+differential equation, it will evidently be necessary to inquire
+what are the forms of such circular triangles in the most
+general case. For it is to be noticed that there is no restriction
+laid upon the values of the constants $\lambda$,~$\mu$,~$\nu$, so that the
+angles of our triangle are not necessarily acute, nor even
+convex; in other words, in the general case the vertices will
+be branch-points. The triangle itself is here to be regarded
+as something like an extensible and flexible membrane spread
+out between the circles forming the boundary.
+
+I have investigated this question in a paper published in
+the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~37.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Nullstellen der hypergeometrischen Reihe}, pp.~573--590.}
+It will be convenient to project
+the plane containing the circular triangle stereographically on
+a sphere. The question then is as to the most general form
+of spherical triangles, taking this term in a generalized meaning
+as denoting any triangle on the sphere bounded by the intersections
+of three planes with the sphere, whether the planes
+intersect at the centre or not.
+
+This is really a question of elementary geometry; and it is
+interesting to notice how often in recent times higher research
+has led back to elementary problems not previously
+settled.
+
+The result in the present case is that there are two, and
+only two, species of such generalized triangles. They are
+obtained from the so-called elementary triangle by two distinct
+operations: (\textit{a})~\emph{lateral}, (\textit{b})~\emph{polar attachment} of a circle.
+%% -----File: 047.png---Folio 37-------
+
+Let $abc$ (\Fig{7}) be the elementary spherical triangle. Then
+the operation of lateral attachment consists in attaching to
+the area~$abc$ the area enclosed by one of the sides, say~$bc$,
+this side being produced so as to form a complete circle.
+The process can, of course, be repeated any number of times
+and applied to each side. If one circular area be attached at~$bc$,
+the angles at $b$~and~$c$ are increased each by~$\pi$; if the
+whole sphere be attached, by~$2\pi$,~etc. The vertices in this
+way become branch-points. A triangle so obtained I call a\DPnote{** TN: italicized in original}
+\emph{triangle of the first species}.
+
+%[Illustration: Fig.~7.]
+%[Illustration: Fig.~8.]
+\Figures{1.625in}{047a}{1.75in}{047b}
+A \emph{triangle of the second species} is produced by the process
+of polar attachment of a circle, say at~$bc$; the whole area
+bounded by the circle~$bc$ is, in this case, connected with the
+original triangle along a branch-cut reaching from the vertex~$a$
+to some point on~$bc$. The point~$a$ becomes a branch-point,
+its angle being increased by~$2\pi$. Moreover, lateral attachments
+can be made at $ab$~and~$ac$.
+
+The two species of triangles are now characterized as follows:
+\emph{the first species may have any number of lateral attachments
+at any or all of the three sides, while the second has a polar
+attachment to one vertex and the opposite side, and may have
+lateral attachments to the other two sides}.
+%% -----File: 048.png---Folio 38-------
+
+Analytically the two species are distinguished by inequalities
+between the absolute values of the constants $\lambda$,~$\mu$,~$\nu$. For
+the first species, none of the three constants is greater than
+the sum of the other two, \ie\
+\[
+|\lambda| \leqq |\mu| + |\nu|, \quad
+|\mu| \leqq |\nu| + |\lambda|, \quad
+|\nu| \leqq |\lambda| + |\mu|;
+\]
+for the second species,
+\[
+|\lambda| \geqq |\mu| + |\nu|,
+\]
+where $\lambda$ refers to the pole.
+
+For the application to the theory of functions, it is important
+to determine, in the case of the second species, the
+number of times the circle formed by the side opposite the
+vertex is passed around. I have found this number to be
+$E\left(\dfrac{|\lambda| - |\mu| - |\nu| + 1}{2}\right)$, where $E$~denotes the greatest positive
+integer contained in the argument, and is therefore always zero
+when this argument happens to be negative or fractional.
+
+Let us now apply these geometrical ideas to the theory of
+hypergeometric functions. I can here only point out one of
+the results obtained. Considering only the real values that
+$\eta = w_{1}/w_{2}$ can assume between $a$ and~$b$, the question presents
+itself as to the shape of the $\eta$-curve between these limits.
+Let us consider for a moment the curves $w_{1}$ and~$w_{2}$. It is
+well known that, if $w_{1}$~oscillates between $a$ and~$b$ from one
+side of the axis to the other, $w_{2}$~will also oscillate; their
+quotient $\eta = w_{1}/w_{2}$ is represented by a curve that consists of
+separate branches extending from $-\infty$ to~$+\infty$, somewhat like
+the curve $y = \tan x$. Now it appears as the result of the
+investigation that the number of these branches, and therefore
+the number of the oscillations of $w_{1}$~and~$w_{2}$, is given precisely
+by the number of circuits of the point~$c$; that is to say, it is
+$E\left(\dfrac{|\nu| - |\lambda| - |\mu| + 1}{2}\right)$. This is a result of importance for all
+%% -----File: 049.png---Folio 39-------
+applications of hypergeometric functions which was derived
+only later (by Hurwitz) by means of Sturm's methods.
+
+I wish to call your particular attention not so much to the
+result itself, however interesting it may be, as to the geometrical
+method adopted in deriving it. More advanced researches on a
+similar line of thought are now being carried on at Göttingen
+by myself and others.
+
+When a differential equation with a larger number of singular
+points than three is the object of investigation, the triangles
+must be replaced by quadrangles and other polygons. In my
+lithographed lectures on \textit{Linear Differential Equations}, delivered
+in 1890--91, I have thrown out some suggestions regarding
+the treatment of such cases. The difficulty arising in these
+generalizations is, strange to say, merely of a geometrical
+nature, viz.\ the difficulty of obtaining a general view of the
+possible forms of the polygons.
+
+Meanwhile, Dr.~Schoenflies has published a paper on rectilinear
+polygons of any number of sides\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Kreisbogenpolygone}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~42, pp.~377--408.}
+while Dr.\ Van~Vleck
+has considered such rectilinear polygons together with the
+functions they define, the polygons being defined in so general
+a way as to admit branch-points even in the interior. Dr.~Schoenflies
+has also treated the case of circular quadrangles,
+the result being somewhat complicated.
+
+In all these investigations the singular points of the $z$-plane
+corresponding to the vertices of the polygons are of course
+assumed to be real, as are also their exponents. There remains
+the still more general question how to represent by conformal
+correspondence the functions in the case when some of these
+elements are complex. In this direction I have to mention the
+name of Dr.~Schilling who has treated the case of the ordinary
+hypergeometric function on the assumption of complex exponents.
+%% -----File: 050.png---Folio 40-------
+
+This treatment of the functions defined by linear differential
+equations of the second order is of course only an example
+of the general discussion of complex functions by means of
+geometry. I hope that many more interesting results will be
+obtained in the future by such geometrical methods.
+%% -----File: 051.png---Folio 41-------
+
+%[** TN: Added comma matches table of contents]
+\Lecture[Mathematical Character of Space-Intuition]
+{VI.}{On the Mathematical Character
+of Space-Intuition\DPtypo{}{,} and the
+Relation of Pure Mathematics to
+the Applied Sciences.}
+
+\Date{(September 2, 1893.)}
+
+\First{In} the preceding lectures I have laid so much stress on
+geometrical methods that the inquiry naturally presents itself
+as to the real nature and limitations of geometrical intuition.
+
+In my address before the Congress of Mathematics at Chicago
+I referred to the distinction between what I called the
+\emph{naïve} and the \emph{refined} intuition. It is the latter that we find in
+Euclid; he carefully develops his system on the basis of well-formulated
+axioms, is fully conscious of the necessity of exact
+proofs, clearly distinguishes between the commensurable and
+incommensurable, and so forth.
+
+The naïve intuition, on the other hand, was especially active
+during the period of the genesis of the differential and integral
+calculus. Thus we see that Newton assumes without hesitation
+the existence, in every case, of a velocity in a moving point,
+without troubling himself with the inquiry whether there might
+not be continuous functions having no derivative.
+
+At the present time we are wont to build up the infinitesimal
+calculus on a purely analytical basis, and this shows that
+we are living in a \emph{critical} period similar to that of Euclid.
+It is my private conviction, although I may perhaps not be
+able to fully substantiate it with complete proofs, that Euclid's
+%% -----File: 052.png---Folio 42-------
+period also must have been preceded by a ``naïve'' stage of
+development. Several facts that have become known only
+quite recently point in this direction. Thus it is now known
+that the books that have come down to us from the time of
+Euclid constitute only a very small part of what was then
+in existence; moreover, much of the teaching was done by
+oral tradition. Not many of the books had that artistic finish
+that we admire in Euclid's ``Elements''; the majority were
+in the form of improvised lectures, written out for the use
+of the students. The investigations of Zeuthen\footnote
+ {\textit{Die Lehre von den Kegelschnitten im Altertum}, übersetzt von R.~v.~Fischer-Benzon,
+ Kopenhagen, Höst, 1886.}
+and Allman\footnote
+ {\textit{Greek geometry from Thales to Euclid}, Dublin, Hodges, 1889.}
+have done much to clear up these historical conditions.
+
+If we now ask how we can account for this distinction
+between the naïve and refined intuition, I must say that, in
+my opinion, the root of the matter lies in the fact that \emph{the
+naïve intuition is not exact, while the refined intuition is not
+properly intuition at all, but arises through the logical development
+from axioms considered as perfectly exact}.
+
+To explain the meaning of the first half of this statement it
+is my opinion that, in our naïve intuition, when thinking of
+a point we do not picture to our mind an abstract mathematical
+point, but substitute something concrete for it. In imagining
+a line, we do not picture to
+%[Illustration: Fig.~9.]
+\WFigure{1.5in}{052}
+ourselves ``length without
+breadth,'' but a \emph{strip} of a certain width.
+Now such a strip has of course \emph{always}
+a tangent (\Fig{9}); \ie\ we can always
+imagine a straight strip having a small
+portion (element) in common with the curved strip; similarly
+with respect to the osculating circle. The definitions in this
+case are regarded as holding only approximately, or as far as
+may be necessary.
+%% -----File: 053.png---Folio 43-------
+
+The ``exact'' mathematicians will of course say that such
+definitions are not definitions at all. But I maintain that in
+ordinary life we actually operate with such inexact definitions.
+Thus we speak without hesitancy of the direction and curvature
+of a river or a road, although the ``line'' in this case has certainly
+considerable width.
+
+As regards the second half of my proposition, there actually
+are many cases where the conclusions derived by purely logical
+reasoning from exact definitions can no more be verified by
+intuition. To show this, I select examples from the theory of
+automorphic functions, because in more common geometrical
+illustrations our judgment is warped by the familiarity of the
+ideas.
+
+Let any number of non-intersecting circles $1$,~$2$,~$3$, $4$,~$\dots$, be
+given (\Fig{10}), and let every circle be reflected (\ie\ transformed
+%[Illustration: Fig.~10.]
+\Figure[3in]{053}
+by inversion, or reciprocal radii vectores) upon every other circle;
+then repeat this operation again and again, \textit{ad~infinitum}. The
+question is, what will be the configuration formed by the totality
+%% -----File: 054.png---Folio 44-------
+of all the circles, and in particular what will be the position of
+the limiting points. There is no difficulty in answering these
+questions by purely logical reasoning; but the imagination
+seems to fail utterly when we try to form a mental image of
+the result.
+
+Again, let a series of circles be given, each circle touching the
+following, while the last touches the first (\Fig{11}). Every circle
+is now reflected upon every other just as in the preceding example,
+and the process is repeated indefinitely. The special case
+when the original points of contact happen to lie on a circle
+%[Illustration: Fig.~11.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{054}
+being excluded, it can be shown analytically that the continuous
+curve which is the locus of all the points of contact \emph{is not an
+analytic curve}. The points of contact form a manifoldness that
+is everywhere dense on the curve (in the sense of G.~Cantor),
+although there are intermediate points between them. At
+each of the former points there is a determinate tangent,
+while there is none at the intermediate points. Second derivatives
+do not exist at all. It is easy enough to imagine a \emph{strip}
+covering all these points; but when the width of the strip is
+reduced beyond a certain limit, we find undulations, and it seems
+impossible to clearly picture to the mind the final outcome.
+It is to be noticed that we have here an example of a curve
+%% -----File: 055.png---Folio 45-------
+with indeterminate derivatives arising out of purely geometrical
+considerations, while it might be supposed from the usual
+treatment of such curves that they can only be defined by
+artificial analytical series.
+
+Unfortunately, I am not in a position to give a full account
+of the opinions of philosophers on this subject. As regards
+the more recent mathematical literature, I have presented my
+views as developed above in a paper published in~1873, and
+since reprinted in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber den allgemeinen Functionsbegriff und dessen Darstellung durch eine
+ willkürliche Curve}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~22 (1883), pp.~249--259.}
+Ideas agreeing in
+general with mine have been expressed by Pasch, of Giessen,
+in two works, one on the foundations of geometry,\footnote
+ {\textit{Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1882.}
+the other
+on the principles of the infinitesimal calculus.\footnote
+ {\textit{Einleitung in die Differential- und Integralrechnung}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1882.}
+Another
+author, Köpcke, of Hamburg, has advanced the idea that our
+space-intuition is exact as far as it goes, but so limited as to
+make it impossible for us to picture to ourselves curves without
+tangents.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Differentiirbarkeit und Anschaulichkeit der stetigen Functionen}, Math.\
+ Annalen, Vol.~29 (1887), pp.~123--140.}
+
+On one point Pasch does not agree with me, and that is as to
+the exact value of the axioms. He believes---and this is the
+traditional view---that it is possible finally to discard intuition
+entirely, basing the whole science on the axioms alone. I am
+of the opinion that, certainly, for the purposes of research it is
+always necessary to combine the intuition with the axioms. I
+do not believe, for instance, that it would have been possible to
+derive the results discussed in my former lectures, the splendid
+researches of Lie, the continuity of the shape of algebraic curves
+and surfaces, or the most general forms of triangles, without
+the constant use of geometrical intuition.
+%% -----File: 056.png---Folio 46-------
+
+Pasch's idea of building up the science purely on the basis of
+the axioms has since been carried still farther by Peano, in his
+logical calculus.
+
+Finally, it must be said that the degree of exactness of the
+intuition of space may be different in different individuals, perhaps
+even in different races.\DPnote{** Yikes} It would seem as if a strong
+naïve space-intuition were an attribute pre-eminently of the
+Teutonic race, while the critical, purely logical sense is more
+fully developed in the Latin and Hebrew races. A full investigation
+of this subject, somewhat on the lines suggested by
+Francis Galton in his researches on heredity, might be interesting.
+
+What has been said above with regard to geometry ranges
+this science among the applied sciences. A few general
+remarks on these sciences and their relation to pure mathematics
+will here not be out of place. From the point of view
+of pure mathematical science I should lay particular stress on
+the \emph{heuristic value} of the applied sciences as an aid to discovering
+new truths in mathematics. Thus I have shown (in my
+little book on Riemann's theories) that the Abelian integrals
+can best be understood and illustrated by considering electric
+currents on closed surfaces. In an analogous way, theorems
+concerning differential equations can be derived from the consideration
+of sound-vibrations; and so on.
+
+But just at present I desire to speak of more practical matters,
+corresponding as it were to what I have said before about
+the inexactness of geometrical intuition. I believe that the
+more or less close relation of any applied science to mathematics
+might be characterized by the degree of exactness attained,
+or attainable, in its numerical results. Indeed, a rough classification
+of these sciences could be based simply on the number
+of significant figures averaged in each. Astronomy (and some
+branches of physics) would here take the first rank; the number
+%% -----File: 057.png---Folio 47-------
+of significant figures attained may here be placed as high as
+seven, and functions higher than the elementary transcendental
+functions can be used to advantage. Chemistry would probably
+be found at the other end of the scale, since in this science
+rarely more than two or three significant figures can be relied
+upon. Geometrical drawing, with perhaps $3$~to $4$~figures, would
+rank between these extremes; and so we might go on.
+
+The ordinary mathematical treatment of any applied science
+substitutes exact axioms for the approximate results of experience,
+and deduces from these axioms the rigid mathematical
+conclusions. In applying this method it must not be forgotten
+that mathematical developments transcending the limit of exactness
+of the science are of no practical value. It follows that a
+large portion of abstract mathematics remains without finding
+any practical application, the amount of mathematics that can
+be usefully employed in any science being in proportion to the
+degree of accuracy attained in the science. Thus, while the
+astronomer can put to good use a wide range of mathematical
+theory, the chemist is only just beginning to apply the first
+derivative, \ie\ the rate of change at which certain processes are
+going on; for second derivatives he does not seem to have
+found any use as yet.
+
+As examples of extensive mathematical theories that do not
+exist for applied science, I may mention the distinction between
+the commensurable and incommensurable, the investigations on
+the convergency of Fourier's series, the theory of non-analytical
+functions,~etc. It seems to me, therefore, that Kirchhoff makes
+a mistake when he says in his \textit{Spectral-Analyse} that absorption
+takes place only when there is \emph{exact} coincidence between the
+wave-lengths. I side with Stokes, who says that absorption
+takes place \emph{in the vicinity} of such coincidence. Similarly, when
+the astronomer says that the periods of two planets must be
+exactly commensurable to admit the possibility of a collision,
+%% -----File: 058.png---Folio 48-------
+this holds only abstractly, for their mathematical centres; and it
+must be remembered that such things as the period, the mass,
+etc., of a planet cannot be exactly defined, and are changing all
+the time. Indeed, we have no way of ascertaining whether
+two astronomical magnitudes are incommensurable or not; we
+can only inquire whether their ratio can be expressed approximately
+by two \emph{small} integers. The statement sometimes made
+that there exist only analytic functions in nature is in my
+opinion absurd. All we can say is that we restrict ourselves
+to analytic, and even only to simple analytic, functions because
+they afford a sufficient degree of approximation. Indeed, we
+have the theorem (of Weierstrass) that any continuous function
+can be approximated to, with any required degree of accuracy,
+by an analytic function. Thus if $\phi(x)$ be our continuous function,
+and $\delta$~a small quantity representing the given limit of
+exactness (the width of the strip that we substitute for the
+curve), it is always possible to determine an \emph{analytic} function~$f(x)$
+such that
+\[
+\phi(x) = f(x) + \epsilon, \quad\text{where}\quad |\epsilon| < |\delta|,
+\]
+within the given limits.
+
+All this suggests the question whether it would not be possible
+to create a, let us say, \emph{abridged} system of mathematics
+adapted to the needs of the applied sciences, without passing
+through the whole realm of abstract mathematics. Such a
+system would have to include, for example, the researches of
+Gauss on the accuracy of astronomical calculations, or the more
+recent and highly interesting investigations of Tchebycheff on
+interpolation. The problem, while perhaps not impossible, seems
+difficult of solution, mainly on account of the somewhat vague
+and indefinite character of the questions arising.
+
+I hope that what I have here said concerning the use of
+mathematics in the applied sciences will not be interpreted
+%% -----File: 059.png---Folio 49-------
+as in any way prejudicial to the cultivation of abstract mathematics
+as a pure science. Apart from the fact that pure
+mathematics cannot be supplanted by anything else as a means
+for developing the purely logical powers of the mind, there
+must be considered here as elsewhere the necessity of the
+presence of a few individuals in each country developed in a
+far higher degree than the rest, for the purpose of keeping
+up and gradually raising the \emph{general} standard. Even a slight
+raising of the general level can be accomplished only when
+some few minds have progressed far ahead of the average.
+
+Moreover, the ``abridged'' system of mathematics referred
+to above is not yet in existence, and we must for the present
+deal with the material at hand and try to make the best of it.
+
+Now, just here a practical difficulty presents itself in the
+teaching of mathematics, let us say of the elements of the
+differential and integral calculus. The teacher is confronted
+with the problem of harmonizing two opposite and almost contradictory
+requirements. On the one hand, he has to consider
+the limited and as yet undeveloped intellectual grasp of his
+students and the fact that most of them study mathematics
+mainly with a view to the practical applications; on the other,
+his conscientiousness as a teacher and man of science would
+seem to compel him to detract in nowise from perfect mathematical
+rigour and therefore to introduce from the beginning
+all the refinements and niceties of modern abstract mathematics.
+In recent years the university instruction, at least in
+Europe, has been tending more and more in the latter direction;
+and the same tendencies will necessarily manifest themselves
+in this country in the course of time. The second
+edition of the \textit{Cours d'analyse} of Camille Jordan may be
+regarded as an example of this extreme refinement in laying
+the foundations of the infinitesimal calculus. To place a work
+of this character in the hands of a beginner must necessarily
+%% -----File: 060.png---Folio 50-------
+have the effect that at the beginning a large part of the subject
+will remain unintelligible, and that, at a later stage, the
+student will not have gained the power of making use of
+the principles in the simple cases occurring in the applied
+sciences.
+
+It is my opinion that in teaching it is not only admissible,
+but absolutely necessary, to be less abstract at the start, to
+have constant regard to the applications, and to refer to the
+refinements only gradually as the student becomes able to
+understand them. This is, of course, nothing but a universal
+pedagogical principle to be observed in all mathematical
+instruction.
+
+Among recent German works I may recommend for the use
+of beginners, for instance, Kiepert's new and revised edition of
+Stegemann's text-book;\footnote
+ {\textit{Grundriss der Differential- und Integral-Rechnung}, 6te~Auflage, herausgegeben
+ von~Kiepert, Hannover, Helwing, 1892.}
+this work seems to combine simplicity
+and clearness with sufficient mathematical rigour. On
+the other hand, it is a matter of course that for more advanced
+students, especially for professional mathematicians, the study
+of works like that of Jordan is quite indispensable.
+
+I am led to these remarks by the consciousness of a growing
+danger in the higher educational system of Germany,---the
+danger of a separation between abstract mathematical science
+and its scientific and technical applications. Such separation
+could only be deplored; for it would necessarily be followed by
+shallowness on the side of the applied sciences, and by isolation
+on the part of pure mathematics.
+%% -----File: 061.png---Folio 51-------
+
+\Lecture[Transcendency of the Numbers $e$ and $\pi$.]
+{VII.}{The Transcendency of the
+Numbers $e$ and $\pi$.}
+
+\Date{(September 4, 1893.)}
+
+\First{Last} Saturday we discussed inexact mathematics; to-day we
+shall speak of the most exact branch of mathematical science.
+
+It has been shown by G.~Cantor that there are two kinds
+of infinite manifoldnesses: (\textit{a})~\emph{countable} (\emph{abzählbare}) manifoldnesses,
+whose quantities can be numbered or enumerated so that
+to each quantity a definite place can be assigned in the system;
+and (\textit{b})~\emph{non-countable} manifoldnesses, for which this is not possible.
+To the former group belong not only the rational numbers,
+but also the so-called \emph{algebraic} numbers, \ie\ all numbers defined
+by an algebraic equation,
+\[
+a + a_{1}x + a_{2}x^{2} + \cdots + a_{n}x^{n} = 0
+\]
+with integral coefficients ($n$~being of course a positive integer).
+As an example of a non-countable manifoldness I may mention
+the totality of all numbers contained in a \emph{continuum}, such as
+that formed by the points of the segment of a straight line.
+Such a continuum contains not only the rational and algebraic
+numbers, but also the so-called transcendental numbers. The
+actual existence of transcendental numbers which thus naturally
+follows from Cantor's theory of manifoldnesses had been proved
+before, from considerations of a different order, by Liouville.
+With this, however, is not yet given any means for deciding
+whether any particular number is transcendental or not. But
+%% -----File: 062.png---Folio 52-------
+during the last twenty years it has been established that the
+two fundamental numbers $e$ and~$\pi$ are really transcendental.
+It is my object to-day to give you a clear idea of the very
+simple proof recently given by Hilbert for the transcendency of
+these two numbers.
+
+%[** TN: Journal titles in next two footnotes (inconsistently) italicized in original]
+The history of this problem is short. Twenty years ago,
+Hermite\footnote
+ {Comptes rendus, Vol.~77 (1873), p.~18,~etc.}
+first established the transcendency of~$e$; \ie\ he
+showed, by somewhat complicated methods, that the number~$e$
+cannot be the root of an algebraic equation with integral
+coefficients. Nine years later, Lindemann,\footnote
+ {Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~20 (1882), p.~213.}
+taking the developments
+of Hermite as his point of departure, succeeded in
+proving the transcendency of~$\pi$. Lindemann's work was
+verified soon after by Weierstrass.
+
+The proof that $\pi$~is a transcendental number will forever
+mark an epoch in mathematical science. It gives the final
+answer to the problem of squaring the circle and settles this
+vexed question once for all. This problem requires to derive
+the number~$\pi$ by a finite number of elementary geometrical
+processes, \ie\ with the use of the ruler and compasses alone.
+As a straight line and a circle, or two circles, have only two
+intersections, these processes, or any finite combination of
+them, can be expressed algebraically in a comparatively simple
+form, so that a solution of the problem of squaring the circle
+would mean that $\pi$~can be expressed as the root of an algebraic
+equation of a comparatively simple kind, viz.\ one that is solvable
+by square roots. Lindemann's proof shows that $\pi$~is not the
+root of any algebraic equation.
+
+The proof of the transcendency of~$\pi$ will hardly diminish the
+number of circle-squarers, however; for this class of people has
+always shown an absolute distrust of mathematicians and a
+%% -----File: 063.png---Folio 53-------
+contempt for mathematics that cannot be overcome by any
+amount of demonstration. But Hilbert's simple proof will
+surely be appreciated by all those who take interest in the
+establishment of mathematical truths of fundamental importance.
+This demonstration, which includes the case of the
+number~$e$ as well as that of~$\pi$, was published quite recently
+in the \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten}.\footnote
+ {1893, No.~2, p.~113.}
+Immediately after\footnote
+ {\textit{Ib}., No.~4.}
+Hurwitz
+published a proof for the transcendency of~$e$ based on still
+more elementary principles; and finally, Gordan\footnote
+ {Comptes rendus,\DPnote{** TN: Ital. in original} 1893, p.~1040.}
+gave a further
+simplification. All three of these papers will be reprinted
+in the next \textit{Heft} of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}.\footnote
+ {Vol.~43 (1894), pp.~216--224.}
+The problem has
+thus been reduced to such simple terms that the proofs for
+the transcendency of $e$ and~$\pi$ should henceforth be introduced
+into university teaching everywhere.
+
+Hilbert's demonstration is based on two propositions. One
+of these simply asserts the transcendency of~$e$, \emph{\ie\ the impossibility
+of an equation of the form}
+\[
+a + a_{1}e + a_{2}e^{2} + \cdots + a_{n}e^{n} = 0,
+\Tag{(1)}
+\]
+where $a$,~$a_{1}$, $a_{2}$,~$\dots$~$a_{n}$ are integral numbers. This is the original
+proposition of Hermite. To prove the transcendency of~$\pi$,
+another proposition (originally due to Lindemann) is required,
+which asserts \emph{the impossibility of an equation of the form}
+\[
+a + e^{\beta_{1}} + e^{\beta_{2}} + \cdots + e^{\beta_{n}} = 0,
+\Tag{(2)}
+\]
+where $a$~is an integer, and the exponents are algebraic numbers,
+viz.\ the roots of an algebraic equation
+\[
+b\beta^{m} + b_{1}\beta^{m-1} + b_{2}\beta^{m-2} + \cdots + b_{m} = 0,
+\]
+$b$,~$b_{1}$, $b_{2}$,~$\dots~b_{m}$ being integers.
+%% -----File: 064.png---Folio 54-------
+
+It will be noticed that the latter proposition really includes
+the former as a special case; for it is of course possible that
+the~$\beta$'s are rational integral numbers, and whenever some of the
+roots of the equation for~$\beta$ are equal, the corresponding terms
+in the equation~\Eq{(2)} will combine into a single term of the form~$a_{k}e^{\beta_{k}}$.
+The former proposition is therefore introduced only for
+the sake of simplicity.
+
+The central idea of the proof of the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(1)}
+consists in introducing for the quantities $1 : e : e^{2} : \dots : e^{n}$, in
+which the equation is homogeneous, proportional quantities
+\[
+I_{0} + \epsilon_{0} : I_{1} + \epsilon_{1} : I_{2} + \epsilon _{2} : \dots : I_{n} + \epsilon_{n},
+\]
+selected so that each consists of an integer~$I$ and a very small
+fraction~$\epsilon$. The equation then assumes the form
+\[
+(aI_{0} + a_{1}I_{1} + \cdots + a_{n}I_{n}) + (a\epsilon_{0} + a_{1}\epsilon_{1} +\cdots + a_{n}\epsilon_{n}) = 0,
+\Tag{(3)}
+\]
+and it can be shown that the $I$'s and~$\epsilon$'s can always be so
+selected as to make the quantity in the first parenthesis, which
+is of course integral, different from zero, while the quantity in
+the second parenthesis becomes a proper fraction. Now, as
+the sum of an integer and a proper fraction cannot be equal
+to zero, the equation~\Eq{(1)} is proved to be impossible.
+
+So much for the general idea of Hilbert's proof. It will be
+seen that the main difficulty lies in the proper determination
+of the integers~$I$ and the fractions~$\epsilon$. For this purpose Hilbert
+makes use of a definite integral suggested by the investigations
+of Hermite, viz.\ the integral
+\[
+J = \int_{0}^{\infty} z^\rho \bigl[(z - 1) \cdots (z - n)\bigr]^{\rho+1} e^{-z}\,dz,
+\]
+where $\rho$~is an integer to be determined afterwards. Multiplying
+equation~\Eq{(1)} term for term by this integral and dividing
+by~$\rho!$, this equation can evidently be put into the form
+%% -----File: 065.png---Folio 55-------
+\begin{multline*}
+\left(a \frac{\int_{0}^{\infty}}{\rho!}
+ + a_{1}e \frac{\int_{1}^{\infty}}{\rho!}
+ + a_{2}e^{2}\frac{\int_{2}^{\infty}}{\rho!} + \cdots
+ + a_{n}e^{n}\frac{\int_{n}^{\infty}}{\rho!}\right)\\
+ + \left(a_{1}e \frac{\int_{0}^{1}}{\rho!}
+ + a_{2}e^{2}\frac{\int_{0}^{2}}{\rho!} + \cdots
+ + a_{n}e^{n}\frac{\int_{0}^{n}}{\rho!}\right) = 0,
+\end{multline*}
+or designating for shortness the quantities in the two parentheses
+by $P_{1}$~and~$P_{2}$, respectively,
+\[
+P_{1} + P_{2} = 0.
+\]
+
+Now it can be proved that the coefficients of $a$,~$a_{1}$, $a_{2}$,~$\dots~a_{n}$
+in~$P_{1}$ are all integers, that $\rho$~can be so selected as to make
+$P_{1}$~different from zero, and that at the same time $\rho$~can be
+taken so large as to make $P_{2}$ as small as we please. Thus,
+equation~\Eq{(1)} will be reduced to the impossible form~\Eq{(3)}.
+
+We proceed to prove these properties of $P_{1}$~and~$P_{2}$. The
+integral~$J$ is readily seen to be an integer divisible by~$\rho!$,
+owing to the well-known relation $\int_{0}^{\infty}z^{\rho}e^{-z}\,dz = \rho!$. Similarly,
+by substituting $z = z' + 1$, $z = z' + 2$,~$\dots$ $z = z' + n$, it can be shown
+that $e \int_{1}^{\infty}$, $e^{2} \int_{2}^{\infty}$,~$\dots \DPtypo{e}{e^{n}}\int_{n}^{\infty}$ are integers divisible by~$(\rho + 1)!$. It
+follows that $P_{1}$~is an integer, viz.\
+\[
+P_{1}\equiv ±a(n!)^{\rho + 1} \pmod[sq]{\rho + 1}.
+\]
+If, therefore, $\rho$~be selected so as to make the right-hand member
+of this congruence not divisible by~$\rho + 1$, the whole expression~$P_{1}$
+is different from zero.
+
+As regards the condition that $P_{2}$ should be made as small
+as we please, it can evidently be fulfilled by selecting a sufficiently
+large value for~$\rho$; this is of course consistent with
+the condition of making $J$ not divisible by~$\rho + 1$. For by the
+theorem of mean values (\textit{Mittelwertsatz}) the integrals can be
+replaced by powers of constant quantities with $\rho$ in the exponent;
+%% -----File: 066.png---Folio 56-------
+and the rate of increase of a power is, for sufficiently
+large values of~$\rho$, always smaller than that of the factorial which
+occurs in the denominator.
+
+The proof of the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(2)} proceeds on
+precisely analogous lines. Instead of the integral~$J$ we have
+now to use the integral
+\[
+J' = b^{m(\rho + 1)}\int_{0}^{\infty} z^{\rho}\bigl[(z - \beta_{1})(z - \beta_{2}) \cdots (z - \beta_{m})\bigr]^{\rho + 1}e^{-z}\,dz,
+\]
+the $\beta$'s being the roots of the algebraic equation
+\[
+b\beta^{m} + b_{1}\beta^{m-1} + \cdots + b_{m} = 0.
+\]
+This integral is decomposed as follows:
+\[
+\int_{0}^{\infty} = \int_{0}^{\beta} + \int_{\beta}^{\infty},
+\]
+where of course the path of integration must be properly
+determined for complex values of~$\beta$. For the details I must
+refer you to Hilbert's paper.
+
+Assuming the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(2)}, the transcendency
+of~$\pi$
+%[Illustration: Fig.~12.]
+\WFigure{2in}{066}
+follows easily from the following considerations, originally
+given by Lindemann. We notice
+first, as a consequence of our theorem,
+that, \emph{with the exception of
+the point $x = 0$, $y = 1$, the exponential
+curve $y = e^{x}$ has no algebraic
+point}, \ie\ no point both of whose
+co-ordinates are algebraic numbers.
+In other words, however
+densely the plane may be covered
+with algebraic points, the exponential curve (\Fig{12}) manages
+to pass along the plane without meeting them, the single point~$(0, 1)$
+excepted. This curious result can be deduced as follows
+from the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(2)}. Let~$y$ be any algebraic
+%% -----File: 067.png---Folio 57-------
+quantity, \ie\ a root of any algebraic equation, and let $y_{1}$,~$y_{2}$,~$\dots$
+be the other roots of the same equation; let a similar notation
+be used for~$x$. Then, if the exponential curve have any algebraic
+point~$(x, y)$, (besides $x = 0$, $y = 1$), the equation
+\[
+\left.
+\begin{array}{@{}l@{}l@{}l@{}l@{}}
+ (y - e^{x}) & (y_{1} - e^{x}) & (y_{2} - e^{x}) &\cdots \\
+ (y - e^{x_{1}}) & (y_{1} - e^{x_{1}}) & (y_{2} - e^{x_{1}}) &\cdots \\
+ (y - e^{x_{2}}) & (y_{1} - e^{x_{2}}) & (y_{2} - e^{x_{2}}) &\cdots \\
+\hdotsfor[3]{4}
+\end{array}
+\right\} = 0
+\]
+must evidently be fulfilled. But this equation, when multiplied
+out, has the form of equation~\Eq{(2)}, which has been shown to be
+impossible.
+
+As second step we have only to apply the well-known identity
+\[
+\DPtypo{1}{-1} = e^{i\pi},
+\]
+which is a special case of $y = e^{x}$. Since in this identity $y = \DPtypo{1}{-1}$ is
+algebraic, $x = i\pi$ must be transcendental.
+%% -----File: 068.png---Folio 58-------
+
+\Lecture{VIII.}{Ideal Numbers.}
+
+\Date{(September 5, 1893.)}
+
+\First{The} theory of numbers is commonly regarded as something
+exceedingly difficult and abstruse, and as having hardly any
+connection with the other branches of mathematical science.
+This view is no doubt due largely to the method of treatment
+adopted in such works as those of Kummer, Kronecker, Dedekind,
+and others who have, in the past, most contributed to the
+advancement of this science. Thus Kummer is reported as
+having spoken of the theory of numbers as the only \emph{pure}
+branch of mathematics not yet sullied by contact with the
+applications.
+
+Recent investigations, however, have made it clear that there
+exists a very intimate correlation between the theory of numbers
+and other departments of mathematics, not excluding
+geometry.
+
+As an example I may mention the theory of the reduction
+of binary quadratic forms as treated in the \textit{Elliptische Modulfunctionen}.
+An extension of this method to higher dimensions
+is possible without serious difficulties. Another example you
+will remember from the paper by Minkowski, \textit{Ueber Eigenschaften
+von ganzen Zahlen, die durch räumliche Anschauung
+erschlossen sind}, which I had the pleasure of presenting to
+you in abstract at the Congress of Mathematics. Here geometry
+is used directly for the development of new arithmetical
+ideas.
+%% -----File: 069.png---Folio 59-------
+
+To-day I wish to speak on the \emph{composition of binary algebraic
+forms}, a subject first discussed by Gauss in his \textit{Disquisitiones
+arithmeticæ}\footnote
+ {In the 5th~section; see Gauss's \textit{Werke}, Vol.~I, p.~239.}
+and of Kummer's corresponding theory of \emph{ideal
+numbers}. Both these subjects have always been considered as
+very abstruse, although Dirichlet has somewhat simplified the
+treatment of Gauss. I trust you will find that the geometrical
+considerations by means of which I shall treat these questions
+introduce so high a degree of simplicity and clearness that for
+those not familiar with the older treatment it must be difficult
+to realize why the subject should ever have been regarded as
+so very intricate. These considerations were indicated by
+myself in the \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten} for January,~1893; and
+at the beginning of the summer semester of the present year
+I treated them in more extended form in a course of lectures. I
+have since learned that similar ideas were proposed by Poincaré
+in~1881; but I have not yet had sufficient leisure to make a
+comparison of his work with my own.
+
+I write a binary quadratic form as follows:
+\[
+f = ax^{2} + bxy + cy^{2},
+\]
+\ie\ without the factor~$2$ in the second term; some advantages
+of this notation were recently pointed out by H.~Weber, in
+the \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten}, 1892--93. The quantities $a$,~$b$,~$c$, $x$,~$y$
+are here of course all assumed to be integers.
+
+It is to be noticed that in the theory of numbers a common
+factor of the coefficients $a$,~$b$,~$c$ cannot be introduced or omitted
+arbitrarily, as in projective geometry; in other words, we are
+concerned with the form, not with an equation. Hence we
+make the supposition that the coefficients $a$,~$b$,~$c$ have no
+common factor; a form of this character is called a \emph{primitive
+form}.
+%% -----File: 070.png---Folio 60-------
+
+As regards the discriminant
+\[
+D = b^{2} - 4ac,
+\]
+we shall assume that it has no quadratic divisor (and hence
+cannot be itself a square), and that it is different from zero.
+Thus $D$~is either $\equiv 0$ or $\equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. Of the two cases,
+\[
+D < 0\quad \text{and} \quad D > 0,
+\]
+which have to be considered separately, I select the former as
+being more simple. Both cases were treated in my lectures
+referred to before.
+
+The following elementary geometrical interpretation of the
+binary quadratic form was given by Gauss, who was much
+inclined to using geometrical considerations in all branches of
+mathematics. Construct a parallelogram (\Fig{13}) with two
+%[Illustration: Fig.~13.]
+\Figure[4in]{070}
+adjacent sides equal to $\sqrt{a}$,~$\sqrt{c}$, respectively, and the included
+angle~$\phi$ such that $\cos\phi = \dfrac{b}{2\sqrt{ac}}$. As $b^{2} - 4ac < 0$, $a$~and~$c$ have
+necessarily the same sign; we here assume that $a$~and~$c$ are
+%% -----File: 071.png---Folio 61-------
+both positive; the case when they are both negative can
+readily be treated by changing the signs throughout. Next
+produce the sides of the parallelogram indefinitely, and draw
+parallels so as to cover the whole plane by a network of
+equal parallelograms. I shall call this a \emph{line-lattice} (\emph{Parallelgitter}).
+
+We now select any one of the intersections, or \emph{vertices}, as
+origin~$O$, and denote every other vertex by the symbol~$(x, y)$,
+$x$~being the number of sides~$\sqrt{a}$, $y$~that of sides~$\sqrt{c}$, which
+must be traversed in passing from~$O$ to~$(x, y)$. Then every
+value that the form~$f$ takes for integral values of~$x$,~$y$ evidently
+represents the square of the distance of the point~$(x, y)$ from~$O$.
+Thus the lattice gives a complete geometrical representation
+of the binary quadratic form. The discriminant~$D$ has
+also a simple geometrical interpretation, the area of each parallelogram
+being $= \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-D}$.
+
+Now, in the theory of numbers, two forms
+\[
+f = ax^{2} + bxy + cy^{2}\quad\text{and}\quad f' = a'x'^{2} + b'x'y' + c'y'^{2}
+\]
+are regarded as equivalent if one can be derived from the other
+by a linear substitution whose determinant is~$1$, say
+\[
+x' = \alpha x + \beta y,\quad
+y' = \gamma x + \delta y,
+\]
+where $\alpha \delta - \beta \gamma = 1$, $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$, $\delta$ being integers. All forms equivalent
+to a given one are said to compose a \emph{class} of quadratic
+forms; these forms have all the same discriminant. What
+corresponds to this equivalence in our geometrical representation
+will readily appear if we fix our attention on the vertices
+only (\Fig{14}); we then obtain what I propose to call a \emph{point-lattice}
+(\emph{Punktgitter}). Such a network of points can be connected
+in various ways by two sets of parallel lines; \ie\ the
+point-lattice represents an infinite number of line-lattices. Now
+it results from an elementary investigation that the point-lattice
+%% -----File: 072.png---Folio 62-------
+is the geometrical image of the \emph{class} of binary quadratic
+forms, the infinite number of line-lattices contained in
+the point-lattice corresponding exactly to the infinite number
+of binary forms contained in the class.
+
+%[Illustration: Fig.~14.]
+\Figure[4in]{072}
+It is further known from the theory of numbers that to
+every value of~$D$ belongs only a finite number of classes;
+hence to every~$D$ will correspond a finite number of point-lattices,
+which we shall afterwards consider together.
+
+Among the different classes belonging to the same value of~$D$,
+there is one class of particular importance, which I call the
+\emph{principal class}. It is defined as containing the form
+\[
+x^{2} - \tfrac{1}{4} Dy^{2}
+\]
+when $D \equiv 0\pmod{4}$, and the form
+\[
+x^{2} + xy + \tfrac{1}{4}(1 - D)y^{2},
+\]
+when $D \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. It is easy to see that the corresponding
+lattices are very simple. When $D \equiv 0 \pmod{4}$, the principal
+lattice is rectangular, the sides of the elementary parallelogram
+%% -----File: 073.png---Folio 63-------
+being~$1$ and~$\sqrt{-\frac{1}{4}D}$. For $D \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$, the parallelogram
+becomes a rhombus. For the sake of simplicity, I shall here
+consider only the former case.
+
+Let us now define complex numbers in connection with the
+principal lattice of the rectangular type (\Fig{15}). The point~$(x, y)$
+%[Illustration: Fig.~15.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{073}
+of the lattice will represent simply the complex number
+\[
+x + \sqrt{-\tfrac{1}{4}D} · y;
+\]
+such numbers we shall call \emph{principal numbers}.
+
+In any system of numbers the laws of multiplication are of
+prime importance. For our principal numbers it is easy to
+prove that the product of any two of them always gives a
+principal number; \emph{\ie\ the system of principal numbers is, for
+multiplication, complete in itself}.
+
+We proceed next to the consideration of lattices of discriminant~$D$
+that do not belong to the principal class; let us call
+them \emph{secondary lattices} (\emph{Nebengitter}). Before investigating the
+laws of multiplication of the corresponding numbers, I must
+call attention to the fact that there is one feature of arbitrariness
+in our representation that has not yet been taken into
+account; this is the \emph{orientation} of the lattice, which may be
+regarded as given by the angles, $\psi$~and~$\chi$, made by the sides
+%% -----File: 074.png---Folio 64-------
+$\sqrt{a}$,~$\sqrt{c}$, respectively, with some fixed initial line (\Fig{16}).
+For the angle~$\phi$ of the parallelogram we have evidently $\phi = \chi - \psi$.
+The point~$(x, y)$ of the lattice will thus give the complex number
+\[
+e^{i\psi} \left[\sqrt{a} · x + \frac{-b + \sqrt{D}}{2\sqrt{a}} · y\right]
+ = e^{i\psi} · \sqrt{a} · x + e^{i\chi} · \sqrt{c} · y,
+\]
+which we call a \emph{secondary number}. The definition of a secondary
+number is therefore indeterminate as long as $\psi$~or~$\chi$ is not
+fixed.
+
+Now, by determining~$\psi$ properly for every secondary point-lattice,
+it is always possible to bring about the important result
+%[Illustration: Fig.~16.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{074}
+that \emph{the product of any two complex numbers of all our lattices
+taken together will again be a complex number of the system},
+so that the totality of these complex numbers forms, likewise,
+for multiplication, a complete system.
+
+Moreover, the multiplication combines the lattices in a
+definite way; thus, if any number belonging to the lattice~$L_{1}$
+be multiplied into any number of the lattice~$L_{2}$, we always obtain
+a number belonging to a definite lattice~$L_{3}$.
+
+These properties will be seen to correspond exactly to the
+characteristic properties of Gauss's \emph{composition of algebraic
+forms}. For Gauss's law merely asserts that the product of
+%% -----File: 075.png---Folio 65-------
+two ordinary numbers that can be represented by two primitive
+forms $f_{1}$,~$f_{2}$ of discriminant~$D$ is always representable by a
+definite primitive form~$f_{3}$ of discriminant~$D$. This law is
+included in the theorem just stated, inasmuch as the values of
+$\sqrt{f_{1}}$,~$\sqrt{f_{2}}$,~$\sqrt{f_{3}}$ represent the distances of the points in the
+lattices from the origin. At the same time we notice that
+Gauss's law is not exactly equivalent to our theorem, since
+in the multiplication of our complex numbers, not only the
+distances are multiplied, but the angles~$\phi$ are added.
+
+It is not impossible that Gauss himself made use of similar
+considerations in deducing his law, which, taken apart from this
+geometrical illustration, bears such an abstruse character.
+
+It now remains to explain what relation these investigations
+have to the ideal numbers of Kummer. This involves the
+question as to the division of our complex numbers and their
+resolution into primes.
+
+In the ordinary theory of real numbers, every number can
+be resolved into primes in only one way. Does this fundamental
+law hold for our complex numbers? In answering this question
+we must distinguish between the system formed by the totality
+of all our complex numbers and the system of principal numbers
+alone. For the former system the answer is: yes, every complex
+number can be decomposed into complex primes in only
+one way. We shall not stop to consider the proof which is
+directly contained in the ordinary theory of binary quadratic
+forms. But if we proceed to the consideration of the system
+of principal numbers alone, the matter is different. There
+are cases when a principal number can be decomposed in
+more than one way into prime factors, \ie\ principal numbers
+not decomposable into principal factors. Thus it may happen
+that we have $m_{1}m_{2} = n_{1}n_{2}$; $m_{1}$,~$m_{2}$, $n_{1}$,~$n_{2}$ being principal primes.
+The reason is,\DPnote{** [sic]} that these principal numbers are no longer primes
+%% -----File: 076.png---Folio 66-------
+if we adjoin the secondary numbers, but are decomposable as
+follows:
+\begin{alignat*}{2}
+m_{1}& = \alpha · \beta, \quad & m_{2} &= \gamma · \delta, \\
+n_{1}& = \alpha · \gamma, \quad & n_{2} &= \beta · \delta,
+\end{alignat*}
+$\alpha$,~$\beta$,~$\gamma$,~$\delta$ being primes in the enlarged system. \emph{In investigating
+the laws of division it is therefore not convenient to consider the
+principal system by itself; it is best to introduce the secondary
+systems.} Kummer, in studying these questions, had originally
+at his disposal only the principal system; and noticing the
+imperfection of the resulting laws of division, he introduced
+by definition his \emph{ideal} numbers so as to re-establish the ordinary
+laws of division. These ideal numbers of Kummer are thus
+seen to be nothing but abstract representatives of our secondary
+numbers. The whole difficulty encountered by every one when
+first attacking the study of Kummer's ideal numbers is therefore
+merely a result of his mode of presentation. By introducing
+from the beginning the secondary numbers by the side of
+the principal numbers, no difficulty arises at all.
+
+It is true that we have here spoken only of complex numbers
+containing square roots, while the researches of Kummer himself
+and of his followers, Kronecker and Dedekind, embrace all
+possible algebraic numbers. But our methods are of universal
+application; it is only necessary to construct lattices in spaces
+of higher dimensions. It would carry us too far to enter into
+details.
+%% -----File: 077.png---Folio 67-------
+
+\Lecture[Solution of Higher Algebraic Equations.]
+{IX.}{The Solution of Higher Algebraic
+Equations.}
+
+\Date{(September 6, 1893.)}
+
+\First{Formerly} the ``solution of an algebraic equation'' used to
+mean its solution by radicals. All equations whose solutions
+cannot be expressed by radicals were classed simply as \emph{insoluble},
+although it is well known that the Galois groups belonging to
+such equations may be very different in character. Even at
+the present time such ideas are still sometimes found prevailing;
+and yet, ever since the year~1858, a very different point of
+view should have been adopted. This is the year in which
+Hermite and Kronecker, together with Brioschi, found the
+solution of the equation of the fifth degree, at least in its
+fundamental ideas.
+
+This solution of the quintic equation is often referred to as
+a ``solution by elliptic functions''; but this expression is not
+accurate, at least not as a counterpart to the ``solution by
+radicals.'' Indeed, the elliptic functions enter into the solution
+of the equation of the fifth degree, as logarithms might be said
+to enter into the solution of an equation by radicals, because
+the radicals can be computed by means of logarithms. \emph{The
+solution of an equation will, \emph{in the present lecture}, be regarded
+as consisting in its reduction to certain algebraic normal equations.}
+That the irrationalities involved in the latter can, in
+the case of the quintic equation, be computed by means of
+tables of elliptic functions (provided that the proper tables of
+%% -----File: 078.png---Folio 68-------
+the corresponding class of elliptic functions were available)
+is an additional point interesting enough in itself, but not to
+be considered by us to-day.
+
+I have simplified the solution of the quintic, and think that
+I have reduced it to the simplest form, by introducing the
+\emph{icosahedron equation} as the proper normal equation.\footnote
+ {See my work \textit{Vorlesungen über das Ikosaeder und die Auflösung der Gleichungen
+ vom fünften Grade}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1884.}
+In other
+words, the icosahedron equation determines the typical irrationality
+to which the solution of the equation of the fifth
+degree can be reduced. This method is capable of being so
+generalized as to embrace a whole theory of the solution of
+higher algebraic equations; and to this I wish to devote the
+present lecture.
+
+It may be well to state that I speak here of equations with
+coefficients that are not fixed numerically; the equations are
+considered from the point of view of the theory of functions,
+the coefficients corresponding to the independent variables.
+
+In saying that an equation is solvable by radicals we mean
+that it is reducible by algebraic processes to so-called pure
+equations,
+\[
+\eta^{n} = z,
+\]
+where $z$~is a known quantity; then only the new question
+arises, how $\eta = \sqrt[n]{z}$ can be computed. Let us compare from
+this point of view the icosahedron equation with the pure
+equation.
+
+The icosahedron equation is the following equation of the
+$60$th~degree:
+\[
+\frac{H^{3}(\eta)}{1728f^{5}(\eta)} = z,
+\]
+where $H$~is a numerical expression of the~$20$th, $f$~one of the
+$12$th~degree, while $z$~is a known quantity. For the actual
+%% -----File: 079.png---Folio 69-------
+forms of $H$ and~$f$ as well as other details I refer you to the
+\textit{Vorlesungen über das Ikosaeder}; I wish here only to point
+out the characteristic properties of this equation.
+
+(1)~Let $\eta$ be any one of the roots; then the $60$~roots can
+all be expressed as linear functions of~$\eta$, with known coefficients,
+such as for instance,
+\[
+\eta,\quad \frac{1}{\eta},\quad \epsilon \eta,\quad
+\frac{(\epsilon - \epsilon^{4})\eta - (\epsilon^{2} - \epsilon^{3})}
+ {(\epsilon^{2} - \epsilon^{3})\eta + (\epsilon - \epsilon^{4})},\quad \text{etc.},
+\]
+where $\epsilon = e^{\frac{2i\pi}{5}}$. These $60$~quantities, then, form a group of $60$~linear
+substitutions.
+%[Illustration: Fig.~17.]
+\Figure{079a}
+
+(2)~Let us next illustrate geometrically the dependence of~$\eta$
+on~$z$ by establishing the conformal representation of the $z$-plane
+on the $\eta$-plane, or rather (by stereographic projection) on a
+sphere (\Fig{17}).
+%[Illustration: Fig.~18.]
+\WFigure{1.625in}{079b}
+The triangles corresponding
+to the upper (shaded) half of
+the $z$-plane are the alternate (shaded)
+triangles on the sphere determined by
+inscribing a regular icosahedron and
+dividing each of the $20$~triangles so
+obtained into six equal and symmetrical
+triangles by drawing the altitudes (\Fig{18}).
+This conformal representation on the sphere assigns to
+every root a definite region, and is therefore equivalent to a
+%% -----File: 080.png---Folio 70-------
+perfect separation of the $60$~roots. On the other hand, it corresponds
+in its regular shape to the $60$~linear substitutions
+indicated above.
+
+(3)~If, by putting $\eta = y_{1}/y_{2}$, we make the $60$~expressions
+of the roots homogeneous, the different values of the quantities~$y$
+will all be of the form
+\[
+\alpha y_{1} + \beta y_{2},\quad \gamma y_{1} + \delta y_{2},
+\]
+and therefore satisfy a linear differential equation of the
+second order
+\[
+y'' + py' + q\DPtypo{}{y} = 0,
+\]
+$p$~and~$q$ being definite rational functions of~$z$. It is, of course,
+always possible to express every root of an equation by means
+of a power series. In our case we reduce the calculation of~$\eta$
+to that of $y_{1}$ and~$y_{2}$, and try to find series for these quantities.
+Since these series must satisfy our differential equation
+of the second order, the law of the series is comparatively
+simple, any term being expressible by means of the two
+preceding terms.
+
+(4)~Finally, as mentioned before, the calculation of the
+roots may be abbreviated by the use of elliptic functions,
+provided tables of such elliptic functions be computed beforehand.
+
+Let us now see what corresponds to each of these four
+points in the case of the \emph{pure} equation $\eta^{n} = z$. The results are
+well known:
+
+(1)~All the $n$~roots can be expressed as linear functions
+of any one of them,~$\eta$:
+\[
+\eta,\quad \epsilon \eta,\quad \epsilon^{2} \eta, \quad\dots\quad \epsilon^{n-1} \eta,
+\]
+$\epsilon$~being a primitive $n$th~root of unity.
+%% -----File: 081.png---Folio 71-------
+
+(2)~The conformal representation (\Fig{19}) gives the division
+of the sphere into $2n$~equal lunes whose great circles all pass
+through the same two points.
+
+%[Illustration: Fig.~19.]
+\Figure{081}
+(3)~There is a differential equation of the first order in~$\eta$,
+viz.,
+\[
+nz · \eta' - \eta = 0,
+\]
+from which simple series can be derived for the purposes of
+actual calculation of the roots.
+
+(4)~If these series should be inconvenient, logarithms can be
+used for computation.
+
+The analogy, you will perceive, is complete. The principal
+difference between the two cases lies in the fact that, for the
+pure equation, the linear substitutions involve but one quantity,
+while for the quintic equation we have a group of \emph{binary} linear
+substitutions. The same distinction finds expression in the
+differential equations, the one for the pure equation being of
+the first order, while that for the quintic is of the second order.
+
+Some remarks may be added concerning the reduction of the
+general equation of the fifth degree,
+\[
+f_{5}(x) = 0,
+\]
+to the icosahedron equation. This reduction is possible because
+the Galois group of our quintic equation (the square root of the
+discriminant having been adjoined) is isomorphic with the group
+%% -----File: 082.png---Folio 72-------
+of the $60$~linear substitutions of the icosahedron equation. This
+possibility of the reduction does not, of course, imply an answer
+to the question, what operations are needed to effect the reduction.
+The second part of my \textit{Vorlesungen über das Ikosaeder} is
+devoted to the latter question. It is found that the reduction
+cannot be performed rationally, but requires the introduction of
+a square root. The irrationality thus introduced is, however, an
+irrationality of a particular kind (a so-called \emph{accessory} irrationality);
+for it must be such as not to reduce the Galois group of
+the equation.
+
+I proceed now to consider the general problem of an analogous
+treatment of higher equations as first given by me in the
+\textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~15 (1879).\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Auflösung gewisser Gleichungen vom siebenten und achten Grade},
+ pp.~251--282.}
+I must remark, first of all,
+that for an accurate exposition it would be necessary to distinguish
+throughout between the homogeneous and projective
+formulations (in the latter case, only the ratios of the homogeneous
+variables are considered). Here it may be allowed to
+disregard this distinction.
+
+%[** TN: Variables inside italics are upright in the original]
+Let us consider the very general problem: \emph{a finite group of
+homogeneous linear substitutions of $n$~variables being given, to
+calculate the values of the $n$~variables from the invariants of the
+group.}
+
+This problem evidently contains the problem of solving an
+algebraic equation of any Galois group. For in this case all
+rational functions of the roots are known that remain unchanged
+by certain \emph{permutations} of the roots, and permutation is, of
+course, a simple case of \emph{homogeneous linear transformation}.
+
+Now I propose a general formulation for the treatment of
+these different problems as follows: \emph{among the problems having
+isomorphic groups we consider as the simplest the one that has the}
+%% -----File: 083.png---Folio 73-------
+\emph{least number of variables, and call this the normal problem. This
+%[** TN: Wording below from 1911 reprint]
+problem must be considered as solvable by series of \DPtypo{any}{some} kind.
+The question is to reduce the other isomorphic problems to the
+normal problem.}
+
+This formulation, then, contains what I propose as a general
+solution of algebraic equations, \ie\ a reduction of the equations
+to the isomorphic problem with a minimum number of
+variables.
+
+The reduction of the equation of the fifth degree to the
+icosahedron problem is evidently contained in this as a special
+case, the minimum number of variables being two.
+
+In conclusion I add a brief account showing how far the general
+problem has been treated for equations of higher degrees.
+
+In the first place, I must here refer to the discussion by
+myself\footnote
+ {Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~15 (1879), pp.~251--282.}
+and Gordan\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Gleichungen siebenten Grades mit einer Gruppe von $168$~Substitutionen},
+ Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~20 (1882), pp.~515--530, and Vol.~25 (1885), pp.~459--521.}
+of those equations of the seventh degree
+that have a Galois group of $168$~substitutions. The minimum
+number of variables is here equal to three, the ternary group
+being the same group of $168$~linear substitutions that has since
+been discussed with full details in Vol.~I. of the \textit{Elliptische
+Modulfunctionen}. While I have confined myself to an exposition
+of the general idea, Gordan has actually performed the
+reduction of the equation of the seventh degree to the ternary
+problem. This is no doubt a splendid piece of work; it is
+only to be deplored that Gordan here, as elsewhere, has disdained
+to give his leading ideas apart from the complicated
+array of formulæ.
+
+Next, I must mention a paper published in Vol.~28 (1887) of
+the \textit{Math.\ Annalen},\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der allgemeinen Gleichungen sechsten und siebenten Grades}, pp.~499--532.}
+where I have shown that for the \emph{general}
+%% -----File: 084.png---Folio 74-------
+equations of the sixth and seventh degrees the minimum number
+of the normal problem is four, and how the reduction can
+be effected.
+
+Finally, in a letter addressed to Camille Jordan\footnote
+ {Journal de mathématiques, année 1888, p.~169.}
+I pointed
+out the possibility of reducing the equation of the $27$th~degree,
+which occurs in the theory of cubic surfaces, to a normal problem
+containing likewise four variables. This reduction has
+ultimately been performed in a very simple way by Burkhardt\footnote
+ {\textit{Untersuchungen aus dem Gebiete der hyperelliptischen Modulfunctionen. Dritter
+ Theil}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~41 (1893), pp.~313--343.}
+while all quaternary groups here mentioned have been considered
+more closely by Maschke.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die quaternäre, endliche, lineare Substitutionsgruppe der Borchardt'schen
+ Moduln}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~30 (1887), pp.~496--515; \textit{Aufstellung des vollen Formensystems
+ einer quaternären Gruppe von $51840$~linearen Substitutionen}, ib., Vol.~33
+ (1889), pp.~317--344; \textit{Ueber eine merkwürdige Configuration gerader Linien im
+ Raume}, ib., Vol.~36 (1890), pp.~190--215.}
+
+This is the whole account of what has been accomplished;
+but it is clear that further progress can be made on the same
+lines without serious difficulty.
+
+A first problem I wish to propose is as follows. In recent
+years many groups of permutations of $6, 7, 8, 9, \dots$ letters have
+been made known. The problem would be to determine in
+each case the minimum number of variables with which isomorphic
+groups of linear substitutions can be formed.
+
+Secondly, I want to call your particular attention to the case
+of the general equation of the eighth degree. I have not been
+able in this case to find a material simplification, so that it
+would seem as if the equation of the eighth degree were its
+own normal problem. It would no doubt be interesting to
+obtain certainty on this point.
+%% -----File: 085.png---Folio 75-------
+
+\Lecture[Hyperelliptic and Abelian Functions.]
+{X.}{On Some Recent Advances in
+Hyperelliptic and Abelian Functions.}
+
+\Date{(September 7, 1893.)}
+
+\First{The} subject of hyperelliptic and Abelian functions is of such
+vast dimensions that it would be impossible to embrace it in
+its whole extent in one lecture. I wish to speak only of the
+mutual correlation that has been established between this
+subject on the one hand, and the theory of invariants, projective
+geometry, and the theory of groups, on the other. Thus in
+particular I must omit all mention of the recent attempts to
+bring arithmetic to bear on these questions. As regards the
+theory of invariants and projective geometry, their introduction
+in this domain must be considered as a realization and farther
+extension of the programme of Clebsch. But the additional
+idea of groups was necessary for achieving this extension.
+What I mean by establishing a mutual correlation between
+these various branches will be best understood if I explain it
+on the more familiar example of the \emph{elliptic functions}.
+
+To begin with the older method, we have the fundamental
+elliptic functions in the Jacobian form
+\[
+\sin\am\left(v, \frac{K'}{K}\right),\quad
+\cos\am\left(v, \frac{K'}{K}\right),\quad
+\Delta\am\left(v, \frac{K'}{K}\right),
+\]
+as depending on two arguments. These are treated in many
+works, sometimes more from the geometrical point of view of
+Riemann, sometimes more from the analytical standpoint of
+%% -----File: 086.png---Folio 76-------
+Weierstrass. I may here mention the first edition of the work
+of Briot and Bouquet, and of German works those by Königsberger
+and by Thomae.
+
+The impulse for a new treatment is due to Weierstrass. He
+introduced, as is well known, three homogeneous arguments,
+$u$,~$\omega_{1}$,~$\omega_{2}$, instead of the two Jacobian arguments. This was
+a necessary preliminary to establishing the connection with
+the theory of linear substitutions. Let us consider the discontinuous
+ternary group of linear substitutions,
+\begin{alignat*}{3}
+u' &= u + & m_{1} \omega_{1} &+& m_{2} \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{1}' &= &\alpha \omega_{1} &+& \beta \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{2}' &= &\gamma \omega_{1} &+& \delta \omega_{2}&,
+\end{alignat*}
+where $\alpha$,~$\beta$,~$\gamma$,~$\delta$ are integers whose determinant $\alpha \delta - \beta \gamma = 1$,
+while $m_{1}$,~$m_{2}$ are any integers whatever. The fundamental
+functions of Weierstrass's theory,
+\[
+p (u, \omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),\quad
+p'(u, \omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),\quad
+g_{2}(\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),\quad
+g_{3}(\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),
+\]
+are nothing but the complete system of invariants of that group.
+It appears, moreover, that $g_{2}$,~$g_{3}$ are also the ordinary (Cayleyan)
+invariants of the binary biquadratic form $f_{4}(x_{1}, x_{2})$, on
+which depends the integral of the first kind
+\[
+\int\frac{x_{1}\,dx_{2} - x_{2}\,dx_{1}}{\sqrt{f_{4}(x_{1}, x_{2})}}.
+\]
+This significant feature that the transcendental invariants turn
+out to be at the same time invariants of the algebraic irrationality
+corresponding to the transcendental theory will hold in
+all higher cases.
+
+As a next step in the theory of elliptic functions we have to
+mention the introduction by Clebsch of the systematic consideration
+of algebraic curves of deficiency~$1$. He considered
+in particular the plane curve of the third order~($C_{3}$) and the
+%% -----File: 087.png---Folio 77-------
+first species of quartic curves~($C_{4}^{1}$) in space, and showed how
+convenient it is for the derivation of numerous geometrical
+propositions to regard the elliptic integrals as taken along these
+curves. The theory of elliptic functions is thus broadened by
+bringing to bear upon it the ideas of modern projective geometry.
+
+By combining and generalizing these considerations, I was
+led to the formulation of a very general programme which may
+be stated as follows (see \textit{Vorlesungen über die Theorie der elliptischen
+Modulfunctionen}, Vol.~II.).
+
+Beginning with the discontinuous group mentioned before
+\begin{alignat*}{3}
+u' &= u + & m_{1} \omega_{1} &+& m_{2} \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{1}'&= &\alpha \omega_{1} &+& \beta \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{2}'&= &\gamma \omega_{1} &+& \delta \omega_{2}&,
+\end{alignat*}
+our first task is to construct all its sub-groups. Among these
+the simplest and most useful are those that I have called
+\emph{congruence sub-groups}; they are obtained by putting
+\[
+\left.
+\begin{alignedat}{2}
+m_{1} &\equiv 0,\quad & m_{2} &\equiv 0, \\
+\alpha &\equiv 1,\quad & \beta &\equiv 0, \\
+\gamma &\equiv 0,\quad &\delta &\equiv 1,
+\end{alignedat}
+\right\} \pmod{n}.
+\]
+
+The second problem is to construct the invariants of all
+these groups and the relations between them. Leaving out
+of consideration all sub-groups except these congruence sub-groups,
+we have still attained a very considerable enlargement
+of the theory of elliptic functions. According to the value
+assigned to the number~$n$, I distinguish different \emph{stages} (\emph{Stufen})
+of the problem. It will be noticed that Weierstrass's theory
+corresponds to the first stage ($n = 1$), while Jacobi's answers,
+generally speaking, to the second ($n = 2$); the higher stages
+have not been considered before in a systematic way.
+
+Thirdly, for the purpose of geometrical illustration, I apply
+Clebsch's idea of the algebraic curve. I begin by introducing
+%% -----File: 088.png---Folio 78-------
+the ordinary square root of the binary form which requires the
+axis of~$x$ to be covered twice; \ie\ we have to use a~$C_{2}$ in an~$S_{1}$.
+I next proceed to the general cubic curve of the plane
+($C_{3}$ in an~$S_{2}$), to the quartic curve in space of three dimensions
+($C_{4}$ in an~$S_{3}$), and generally to the elliptic curve~$C_{n+1}$ in an~$S_{n}$.
+These are what I call the normal elliptic curves; they serve best
+to illustrate any algebraic relations between elliptic functions.
+
+I may notice, by the way, that the treatment here proposed
+is strictly followed in the \textit{Elliptische Modulfunctionen}, except
+that there the quantity~$u$ is of course assumed to be zero, since
+this is precisely what characterizes the modular functions. I
+hope some time to be able to treat the whole theory of elliptic
+functions (\ie\ with $u$~different from zero) according to this
+programme.
+
+The successful extension of this programme to the theory of
+hyperelliptic and Abelian functions is the best proof of its
+being a real step in advance. I have therefore devoted my
+efforts for many years to this extension; and in laying before
+you an account of what has been accomplished in this rather
+special field, I hope to attract your attention to various lines of
+research along which new work can be spent to advantage.
+
+As regards the \emph{hyperelliptic functions}, we may premise as a
+general definition that they are functions of \emph{two} variables $u_{1}$,~$u_{2}$,
+with \emph{four} periods (while the elliptic functions have \emph{one} variable~$u$,
+and \emph{two} periods). Without attempting to give an
+historical account of the development of the theory of hyperelliptic
+functions, I turn at once to the researches that mark
+a progress along the lines specified above, beginning with the
+geometric application of these functions to surfaces in a space
+of any number of dimensions.
+
+Here we have first the investigation by Rohn of Kummer's
+surface, the well-known surface of the fourth order, with $16$~conical
+%% -----File: 089.png---Folio 79-------
+points. I have myself given a report on this work in
+the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~27 (1886).\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Configurationen, welche der Kummer'schen Fläche zugleich eingeschrieben
+ und umgeschrieben sind}, pp.~106--142.}
+If every mathematician is
+struck by the beauty and simplicity of the relations developed
+in the corresponding cases of the elliptic functions (the~$C_{3}$ in
+the plane,~etc.), the remarkable configurations inscribed and
+circumscribed to the Kummer surface that have here been
+developed by Rohn and myself, should not fail to elicit interest.
+
+Further, I have to mention an extensive memoir by Reichardt,
+published in~1886, in the \textit{Acta Leopoldina}, where the connection
+between hyperelliptic functions and Kummer's surface is
+summarized in a convenient and comprehensive form, as an
+introduction to this branch. The starting-point of the investigation
+is taken in the theory of line-complexes of the second
+degree.
+
+Quite recently the French mathematicians have turned their
+attention to the general question of the representation of surfaces
+by means of hyperelliptic functions, and a long memoir by
+Humbert on this subject will be found in the last volume of the
+\textit{Journal de Mathématiques.}\footnote
+ {\textit{Théorie générale des surfaces hyperelliptiques}, année~1893, pp.~29--170.}
+
+I turn now to the abstract theory of hyperelliptic functions.
+It is well known that Göpel and Rosenhain established that
+theory in~1847 in a manner closely corresponding to the Jacobian
+theory of elliptic functions, the integrals
+\[
+u_{1} = \int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{f_{6}(x)}},\quad
+u_{2} = \int \frac{x\,dx}{\sqrt{f_{6}(x)}}
+\]
+taking the place of the single elliptic integral~$u$. Here, then,
+the question arises: what is the relation of the hyperelliptic
+functions to the invariants of the binary form of the sixth order
+$f_{6}(x_{1}, x_{2})$? In the investigation of this question by myself and
+%% -----File: 090.png---Folio 80-------
+Burkhardt, published in Vol.~27 (1886)\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber hyperelliptische Sigmafunctionen}, pp.~431--464.}
+and Vol.~32 (1888)\footnote
+ {pp.~351--380 and 381--442.}
+of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, we found that the decompositions of
+the form~$f_{6}$ into two factors of lower order, $f_{6} = \phi_{1} \psi_{5} = \phi_{3} \psi_{3}$,
+had to be considered. These being, of course, irrational decompositions,
+the corresponding invariants are irrational; and a
+study of the theory of such invariants became necessary.
+
+But another new step had to be taken. The hyperelliptic
+integrals involve the form~$f_{6}$ under the square root,~$\sqrt{f_{6}(x_{1}, x_{2})}$.
+The corresponding Riemann surface has, therefore, two leaves
+connected at six points; and the problem arises of considering
+binary forms of $x_{1}$,~$x_{2}$ on such a Riemann surface, just as ordinarily
+functions of $x$~alone are considered thereon. It can be
+shown that there exists a particular kind of forms called \emph{primeforms},
+strictly analogous to the determinant $x_{1}y_{2} - x_{2}y_{1}$ in the
+ordinary complex plane. The primeform on the two-leaved
+Riemann surface, like this determinant in the ordinary theory,
+has the property of vanishing only when the points $(x_{1}, x_{2})$ and
+$(y_{1}, y_{2})$ co-incide (on the same leaf). Moreover, the primeform
+does not become infinite anywhere. The analogy to the determinant
+$x_{1}y_{2} - x_{2}y_{1}$ fails only in so far as the primeform is no
+longer an algebraic but a transcendental form. Still, all algebraic
+forms on the surface can be decomposed into prime
+factors. Moreover, these primeforms give the natural means
+for the construction of the $\theta$-functions. As an intermediate
+step we have here functions called by me $\sigma$-functions in analogy
+to the $\sigma$-functions of Weierstrass's elliptic theory. In the
+papers referred to (\textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vols.~27,~32) all these considerations
+are, of course, given for the general case of hyperelliptic
+functions, the irrationality being $\sqrt{f_{2p+2}(x_{1}, x_{2})}$, where
+$f_{2p+2}$ is a binary form of the order~$2p+2$.
+%% -----File: 091.png---Folio 81-------
+
+Having thus established the connection between the ordinary
+theory of hyperelliptic functions of $p = 2$ and the invariants of
+the binary sextic, I undertook the systematic development of
+what I have called, in the case of elliptic functions, the \emph{Stufentheorie}.
+The lectures I gave on this subject in~1887--88
+have been developed very fully by Burkhardt in the \textit{Math.\
+Annalen}, Vol.~35 (1890).\footnote
+ {\textit{Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Systematik der hyperelliptischen Functionen~I.
+ Ordnung}, pp.~198--296.}
+
+As regards the first stage, which, owing to the connection
+with the theory of \emph{rational} invariants and covariants, requires
+very complicated calculations, the Italian mathematician, Pascal,
+has made much progress (\textit{Annali di matematica}). In this
+connection I must refer to the paper by Bolza\footnote
+ {\textit{Darstellung der rationalen ganzen Invarianten der Binärform sechsten Grades
+ durch die Nullwerthe der zugehörigen $\theta$-Functionen}, pp.~478--495.}
+in \textit{Math.\
+Annalen}, Vol.~30 (1887), where the question is discussed in
+how far it is possible to represent the rational invariants of
+the sextic by means of the zero values of the $\theta$-functions.
+
+For higher stages, in particular stage three, Burkhardt has
+given very valuable developments in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~36
+(1890), p.~371; Vol.~38 (1891), p.~161; Vol.~41 (1893), p.~313.
+He considers, however, only the hyperelliptic modular functions
+($u_{1}$~and~$u_{2}$ being assumed to be zero). The final aim, which
+Burkhardt seems to have attained, although a large amount
+of numerical calculation remains to be filled in, consists here
+in establishing the so-called \emph{multiplier-equation} for transformations
+of the third order. The equation is of the $40$th~degree;
+and Burkhardt has given the general law for the formation
+of the coefficients.
+
+I invite you to compare his treatment with that of Krause
+in his book \textit{Die Transformation der hyperelliptischen Functionen
+erster Ordnung}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1886. His investigations,
+%% -----File: 092.png---Folio 82-------
+based on the general relations between $\theta$-functions, may
+go farther; but they are carried out from purely formal
+point of view, without reference to the theories of invariants,
+of groups, or other allied topics.
+
+So much as regards hyperelliptic functions. I now proceed
+to report briefly on the corresponding advances made in the
+theory of Abelian functions. I give merely a list of papers;
+they may be classed under three heads:
+
+(1)~A \emph{preliminary} question relates to the invariant representation
+of the integral of the third kind on algebraic curves of
+higher deficiency. Pick\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~29 (1887), pp.~259--271.}
+has considered this problem for plane
+curves having no singular points. On the other hand, White,
+in his dissertation,\footnote
+ {\textit{Abel'sche Integrale auf singularitätenfreien, einfach überdeckten, vollständigen
+ Schnittcurven eines beliebig ausgedehnten Raumes}, Halle, 1891, pp.~43--128.}
+briefly reported in \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~36
+(1890), p.~597, and printed in full in the \textit{Acta Leopoldina}, has
+treated such curves in space as are the complete intersection
+of two surfaces and have no singular point. We may here
+also notice the researches of Pick and Osgood\footnote
+ {Osgood, \textit{Zur Theorie der zum algebraischen Gebilde $y^{m} = R(x)$ gehörigen
+ Abel'schen Functionen}, Göttingen, 1890, 8vo, 61~pp.}
+on the so-called
+binomial integrals.
+
+(2)~An exposition of the general theory of forms on Riemann
+surfaces of any kind, in particular a definition of the
+primeform belonging to each surface, was given by myself
+in Vol.~36 (1890) of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}.\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, pp.~1--83.}
+I may add that
+during the last year this subject was taken up anew and
+farther developed by Dr.~Ritter; see \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten}
+%[** TN: Correct volume number from 1911 reprint]
+for~1893, and \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~\DPtypo{43}{44}. Dr.~Ritter considers
+the algebraic forms as special cases of more general forms, the
+\emph{multiplicative forms}, and thus takes a real step in advance.
+%% -----File: 093.png---Folio 83-------
+
+(3)~Finally, the particular case $p = 3$ has been studied on the
+basis of our programme in various directions. The normal
+curve for this case is well known to be the plane quartic~$C_{4}$
+whose geometric properties have been investigated by Hesse
+and others. I found (\textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~36) that these
+geometrical results, though obtained from an entirely different
+point of view, corresponded exactly to the needs of the Abelian
+problem, and actually enabled me to define clearly the $64$
+$\theta$-functions with the aid of the~$C_{4}$. Here, as elsewhere, there
+seems to reign a certain pre-established harmony in the development
+of mathematics, what is required in one line of research
+being supplied by another line, so that there appears to be
+a logical necessity in this, independent of our individual
+disposition.
+
+In this case, also, I have introduced $\sigma$-functions in the place
+of the $\theta$-functions. The coefficients are irrational covariants
+just as in the case $p = 2$. These $\sigma$-series have been studied at
+great length by Pascal in the \textit{Annali di Matematica}. These
+investigations bear, of course, a close relation to those of
+Frobenius and Schottky, which only the lack of time prevents
+me from quoting in detail.
+
+Finally, the recent investigations of an Austrian mathematician,
+\emph{Wirtinger}, must here be mentioned. First, Wirtinger has
+established for $p = 3$ the analogue to the Kummer surface; this
+is a manifoldness of three dimensions and the $24$th~order in an~$S_{7}$;
+see \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten} for~1889, and \textit{Wiener Monatshefte},
+1890. Though apparently rather complicated, this manifoldness
+has some very elegant properties; thus it is transformed into
+itself by $64$~collineations and $64$~reciprocations. Next, in
+Vol.~40 (1892), of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen},\footnote
+ {\textit{Untersuchungen über Abel'sche Functionen vom Geschlechte}~3, pp.~261--312.}
+Wirtinger has discussed
+the Abelian functions on the assumption that only
+%% -----File: 094.png---Folio 84-------
+\emph{rational} invariants and covariants of the curve of the fourth
+order are to be considered; this corresponds to the ``first
+stage'' with $p = 3$. The investigation is full of new and
+fruitful ideas.
+
+In concluding, I wish to say that, for the cases $p = 2$ and
+$p = 3$, while much still remains to be done, the fundamental
+difficulties have been overcome. The great problem to be
+attacked next is that of $p = 4$, where the normal curve is of the
+sixth order in space. It is to be hoped that renewed efforts
+will result in overcoming all remaining difficulties. Another
+promising problem presents itself in the field of $\theta$-functions,
+when the general $\theta$-series are taken as starting-point, and not
+the algebraic curve. An enormous number of formulæ have
+there been developed by analysts, and the problem would be
+to connect these formulæ with clear geometrical conceptions
+of the various algebraic configurations. I emphasize these
+special problems because the Abelian functions have always
+been regarded as one of the most interesting achievements
+of modern mathematics, so that every advance we make in
+this theory gives a standard by which we can measure our
+own efficiency.
+%% -----File: 095.png---Folio 85-------
+
+\Lecture{XI.}{The Most Recent Researches
+in Non-Euclidean Geometry.}
+
+\Date{(September 8, 1893.)}
+
+\First{My} remarks to-day will be confined to the progress of non-Euclidean
+geometry during the last few years. Before reporting
+on these latest developments, however, I must briefly
+summarize what may be regarded as the general state of
+opinion among mathematicians in this field. There are three
+points of view from which non-Euclidean geometry has been
+considered.
+
+(1)~First we have the point of view of elementary geometry, of
+which Lobachevsky and Bolyai themselves are representatives.
+Both begin with simple geometrical constructions, proceeding
+just like Euclid, except that they substitute another axiom for
+the axiom of parallels. Thus they build up a system of non-Euclidean
+geometry in which the length of the line is infinite,
+and the ``measure of curvature'' (to anticipate a term not used
+by them) is negative. It is, of course, possible by a similar
+process to obtain the geometry with a positive measure of
+curvature, first suggested by Riemann; it is only necessary
+to formulate the axioms so as to make the length of a line
+finite, whereby the existence of parallels is made impossible.
+
+(2)~From the point of view of projective geometry, we begin
+by establishing the system of projective geometry in the sense
+of von~Staudt, introducing projective co-ordinates, so that
+straight lines and planes are given by \emph{linear} equations. Cayley's
+%% -----File: 096.png---Folio 86-------
+theory of projective measurement leads then directly to
+the three possible cases of non-Euclidean geometry: hyperbolic,
+parabolic, and elliptic, according as the measure of
+curvature~$k$ is $< 0$,~$= 0$, or~$> 0$. It is here, of course, essential
+to adopt the system of von~Staudt and not that of
+Steiner, since the latter defines the anharmonic ratio by
+means of distances of points, and not by pure projective
+constructions.
+
+(3)~Finally, we have the point of view of Riemann and Helmholtz.
+Riemann starts with the idea of the element of distance~$ds$,
+which he assumes to be expressible in the form
+\[
+ds = \sqrt{\sum a_{ik}\,dx_{i}\,dx_{k}}.
+\]
+Helmholtz, in trying to find a reason for this assumption, considers
+the motions of a rigid body in space, and derives from
+these the necessity of giving to~$ds$ the form indicated. On the
+other hand, Riemann introduces the fundamental notion of the
+\emph{measure of curvature of space}.
+
+The idea of a measure of curvature for the case of two
+variables, \ie\ for a surface in a three-dimensional space, is due
+to Gauss, who showed that this is an intrinsic characteristic of
+the surface quite independent of the higher space in which the
+surface happens to be situated. This point has given rise to a
+misunderstanding on the part of many non-Euclidean writers.
+When Riemann attributes to his space of three dimensions a
+measure of curvature~$k$, he only wants to say that there exists
+an invariant of the ``form'' $\sum{a_{ik}\,dx_{i}\,dx_{k}}$; he does not mean to
+imply that the three-dimensional space necessarily exists as a
+curved space in a space of four dimensions. Similarly, the
+illustration of a space of constant positive measure of curvature
+by the familiar example of the sphere is somewhat misleading.
+Owing to the fact that on the sphere the geodesic lines (great
+circles) issuing from any point all meet again in another definite
+%% -----File: 097.png---Folio 87-------
+point, antipodal, so to speak, to the original point, the existence
+of such an antipodal point has sometimes been regarded as a
+necessary consequence of the assumption of a constant positive
+curvature. The projective theory of non-Euclidean space shows
+immediately that the existence of an antipodal point, though
+compatible with the nature of an elliptic space, is not necessary,
+but that two geodesic lines in such a space may intersect in
+one point if at all.\footnote
+ {This theory has also been developed by Newcomb, in the \textit{Journal für reine
+ und angewandte Mathematik}, Vol.~83 (1877), pp.~293--299.}
+
+I call attention to these details in order to show that there
+is some advantage in adopting the second of the three points of
+view characterized above, although the third is at least equally
+important. Indeed, our ideas of space come to us through the
+senses of vision and motion, the ``optical properties'' of space
+forming one source, while the ``mechanical properties'' form
+another; the former corresponds in a general way to the projective
+properties, the latter to those discussed by Helmholtz.
+
+As mentioned before, from the point of view of projective
+geometry, von~Staudt's system should be adopted as the basis.
+It might be argued that von~Staudt practically assumes the
+axiom of parallels (in postulating a one-to-one correspondence
+between a pencil of lines and a row of points). But I have
+shown in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die sogenannte Nicht-Euklidische Geometrie}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~6
+ (1873), pp.~112--145.}
+how this apparent difficulty can
+be overcome by restricting all constructions of von~Staudt to a
+limited portion of space.
+
+I now proceed to give an account of the most recent researches
+in non-Euclidean geometry made by Lie and myself.
+Lie published a brief paper on the subject in the \textit{Berichte} of
+the Saxon Academy~(1886), and a more extensive exposition
+of his views in the same \textit{Berichte} for 1890 and~1891. These
+%% -----File: 098.png---Folio 88-------
+papers contain an application of Lie's theory of continuous
+groups to the problem formulated by Helmholtz. I have the
+more pleasure in placing before you the results of Lie's investigations
+as they are not taken into due account in my paper
+on the foundations of projective geometry in Vol.~37 of the
+\textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1890),\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Nicht-Euklidischen Geometrie}, pp.~544--572.}
+nor in my (lithographed) lectures on
+non-Euclidean geometry delivered at Göttingen in~1889--90; the
+last two papers of Lie appeared too late to be considered, while
+the first had somehow escaped my memory.
+
+I must begin by stating the problem of Helmholtz in modern
+terminology. The motions of three-dimensional space are~$\infty^{6}$,
+and form a group, say~$G_{6}$. This group is known to have an
+invariant for any two points $p$,~$p'$, viz.\ the distance $\Omega (p, p')$
+of these points. But the form of this invariant (and generally
+the form of the group) in terms of the co-ordinates $x_{1}$,~$x_{2}$,~$x_{3}$,
+$y_{1}$,~$y_{2}$,~$y_{3}$ of the points is not known \textit{a~priori}. The question
+arises whether the group of motions is fully characterized by
+these two properties so that none but the Euclidean and the
+two non-Euclidean systems of geometry are possible.
+
+For illustration Helmholtz made use of the analogous case
+in two dimensions. Here we have a group of $\infty^{3}$~motions;
+the distance is again an invariant; and yet it is possible to
+construct a group not belonging to any one of our three
+systems, as follows.
+
+Let $z$ be a complex variable; the substitution characterizing
+the group of Euclidean geometry can be written in the well-known
+form
+\[
+z' = e^{i\phi}z + m + in = (\cos\phi + i \sin\phi)z + m + in.
+\]
+Now modifying this expression by introducing a complex
+number in the exponent,
+\[
+z' = e^{(a+i)\phi}z + m + in = e^{a\phi} (\cos\phi + i \sin\phi)z + m + in,
+\]
+%% -----File: 099.png---Folio 89-------
+we obtain a group of transformations by which a point (in
+the simple case $m = 0$, $n = 0$) would not move about the origin
+in a circle, but in a logarithmic spiral; and yet this is a group~$G_{3}$
+with three variable parameters $m$,~$n$,~$\phi$, having an invariant
+for every two points, just like the original group. Helmholtz
+concludes, therefore, that a new condition, that of \emph{monodromy},
+must be added to determine our group completely.
+
+I now proceed to the work of Lie. First as to the results:
+Lie has confirmed those of Helmholtz with the single exception
+that in space of three dimensions the axiom of monodromy is
+not needed, but that the groups to be considered are fully
+determined by the other axioms. As regards the proofs, however,
+Lie has shown that the considerations of Helmholtz must
+be supplemented. The matter is this. In keeping one point of
+space fixed, our $G_{6}$ will be reduced to a~$G_{3}$. Now Helmholtz
+inquires how the differentials of the lines issuing from the fixed
+point are transformed by this~$G_{3}$. For this purpose he writes
+down the formulæ
+\begin{align*}
+dx_{1}' &= a_{11}\, dx_{1} + a_{12}\, dx_{2} + a_{13}\, dx_{3}, \\
+dx_{2}' &= a_{21}\, dx_{1} + a_{22}\, dx_{2} + a_{23}\, dx_{3}, \\
+dx_{3}' &= a_{31}\, dx_{1} + a_{32}\, dx_{2} + a_{33}\, dx_{3},
+\end{align*}
+and considers the coefficients $a_{11}$, $a_{12}$,~$\dots$ $a_{33}$ as depending on
+three variable parameters. But Lie remarks that this is not
+sufficiently general. The linear equations given above represent
+only the first terms of power series, and the possibility
+must be considered that the three parameters of the group may
+not all be involved in the linear terms. In order to treat all
+possible cases, the general developments of Lie's theory of
+groups must be applied, and this is just what Lie does.
+
+Let me now say a few words on my own recent researches in
+non-Euclidean geometry which will be found in a paper published
+in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~37 (1890), p.~544. Their
+%% -----File: 100.png---Folio 90-------
+result is that our ideas as to non-Euclidean space are still very
+incomplete. Indeed, all the researches of Riemann, Helmholtz,
+Lie, consider only a portion of space surrounding the origin;
+they establish the existence of analytic laws in the vicinity of
+that point. Now this space can of course be continued, and
+the question is to see what kind of connection of space may
+result from this continuation. It is found that there are different
+possibilities, each of the three geometries giving rise
+to a series of subdivisions.
+
+To understand better what is meant by these varieties of
+connection, let us compare the geometry on a sphere with that
+in the sheaf of lines formed by the diameters of the sphere.
+Considering each diameter as an infinite line or ray passing
+through the centre (not a half-ray issuing from the centre), to
+each line of the sheaf there will correspond two points on the
+sphere, viz.\ the two points of intersection of the line with the
+sphere. We have, therefore, a one-to-two correspondence
+between the lines of the sheaf and the points of the sphere.
+Let us now take a small area on the sphere; it is clear that
+the distance of two points contained in this area is equal to
+the angle of the corresponding lines of the sheaf. Thus the
+geometry of points on the sphere and the geometry of lines in
+the sheaf are identical as far as small regions are concerned, both
+corresponding to the assumption of a constant positive measure
+of curvature. A difference appears, however, as soon as we
+consider the whole closed sphere on the one hand and the complete
+sheaf on the other. Let us take, for instance, two geodesic
+lines of the sphere, \ie\ two great circles, which evidently intersect
+in two (diametral) points. The corresponding pencils of
+the sheaf have only \emph{one} straight line in common.
+
+A second example for this distinction occurs in comparing
+the geometry of the Euclidean plane with the geometry on a
+closed cylindrical surface. The latter can be developed in the
+%% -----File: 101.png---Folio 91-------
+usual way into a strip of the plane bounded by two parallel
+lines, as will appear from \Fig{20}, the arrows indicating that
+the opposite points of the edges are coincident on the cylindrical
+surface. We notice at once the difference: while in the
+plane all geodesic lines are infinite, on the cylinder there is
+%[Illustration: Fig.~20.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{101a}
+one geodesic line that is of finite length, and while in the plane
+two geodesic lines always intersect in one point, if at all, on
+the cylinder there may be $\infty$~points of intersection.
+
+This second example was generalized by Clifford in an
+address before the Bradford meeting of the British Association~(1873).
+%[Illustration: Fig. 21.]
+\Figure[2in]{101b}
+In accordance with Clifford's general idea, we
+may define a closed surface by taking a parallelogram out of
+an ordinary plane and making the opposite edges correspond
+point to point as indicated in \Fig{21}. It is not to be
+understood that the opposite edges should be brought to
+%% -----File: 102.png---Folio 92-------
+coincidence by bending the parallelogram (which evidently
+would be impossible without stretching); but only the logical
+convention is made that the opposite points should be considered
+as identical. Here, then, we have a closed manifoldness
+of the connectivity of an anchor-ring, and every one
+will see the great differences that exist here in comparison
+with the Euclidean plane in everything concerning the lengths
+and the intersections of geodesic lines, etc.
+
+It is interesting to consider the $G_{3}$ of Euclidean motions on
+this surface. There is no longer any possibility of moving the
+surface on itself in $\infty^{3}$~ways, the closed surface being considered
+in its totality. But there is no difficulty in moving any
+small area over the closed surface in $\infty^{3}$~ways.
+
+We have thus found, in addition to the Euclidean plane,
+two other forms of surfaces: the strip between parallels and
+Clifford's parallelogram. Similarly we have by the side of
+ordinary Euclidean space three other types with the Euclidean
+element of arc; one of these results from considering a
+parallelepiped.
+
+Here I introduce the axiomatic element. There is no way
+of proving that the whole of space can be moved in itself in
+$\infty^{6}$~ways; all we know is that small portions of space can be
+moved in space in $\infty^{6}$~ways. Hence there exists the possibility
+that our actual space, the measure of curvature being taken as
+zero, may correspond to any one of the four cases.
+
+Carrying out the same considerations for the spaces of constant
+positive measure of curvature, we are led back to the two
+cases of elliptic and spherical geometry mentioned before. If,
+however, the measure of curvature be assumed as a negative
+constant, we obtain an infinite number of cases, corresponding
+exactly to the configurations considered by Poincaré and myself
+in the theory of automorphic functions. This I shall not stop
+to develop here.
+%% -----File: 103.png---Folio 93-------
+
+I may add that Killing has verified this whole theory.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Clifford-Klein'schen Raumformen}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~39 (1891),
+ pp.~257--278.}
+It
+is evident that from this point of view many assertions concerning
+space made by previous writers are no longer correct
+(\textit{e.g.}\ that infinity of space is a consequence of zero curvature),
+so that we are forced to the opinion that our geometrical
+demonstrations have no absolute objective truth, but are true
+only for the present state of our knowledge. These demonstrations
+are always confined within the range of the space-conceptions
+that are familiar to us; and we can never tell
+whether an enlarged conception may not lead to further
+possibilities that would have to be taken into account.
+From this point of view we are led in geometry to a certain
+modesty, such as is always in place in the physical sciences.
+%% -----File: 104.png---Folio 94-------
+
+\Lecture{XII.}{The Study of Mathematics
+at Göttingen.}
+
+\Date{(September 9, 1893.)}
+
+\First{In} this last lecture I should like to make some general
+remarks on the way in which the study of mathematics is
+organized at the university of Göttingen, with particular reference
+to what may be of interest to American students. At the
+same time I desire to give you an opportunity to ask any questions
+that may occur to you as to the broader subject of mathematical
+study at German universities in general. I shall be
+glad to answer such inquiries to the extent of my ability.
+
+It is perhaps inexact to speak of an \emph{organization} of the
+mathematical teaching at Göttingen; you know that \textit{Lern- und
+Lehr-Freiheit} prevail at a German university, so that the organization
+I have in mind consists merely in a voluntary agreement
+among the mathematical professors and instructors. We distinguish
+at Göttingen between a general and a higher course
+in mathematics. The general course is intended for that large
+majority of our students whose intention it is to devote themselves
+to the teaching of mathematics and physics in the higher
+schools (\textit{Gymnasien}, \textit{Realgymnasien}, \textit{Realschulen}), while the
+higher course is designed specially for those whose final aim
+is original investigation.
+
+As regards the former class of students, it is my opinion that
+in Germany (here in America, I presume, the conditions are
+very different) the abstractly theoretical instruction given to
+%% -----File: 105.png---Folio 95-------
+them has been carried too far. It is no doubt true that what
+the university should give the student above all other things
+is the scientific ideal. For this reason even these students
+should push their mathematical studies far beyond the elementary
+branches they may have to teach in the future. But the
+ideal set before them should not be chosen so far distant, and
+so out of connection with their more immediate wants, as to
+make it difficult or impossible for them to perceive the bearing
+that this ideal has on their future work in practical life.
+In other words, the ideal should be such as to fill the future
+teacher with enthusiasm for his life-work, not such as to make
+him look upon this work with contempt as an unworthy
+drudgery.
+
+For this reason we insist that our students of this class, in
+addition to their lectures on pure mathematics, should pursue
+a thorough course in physics, this subject forming an integral
+part of the curriculum of the higher schools. Astronomy is
+also recommended as showing an important application of
+mathematics; and I believe that the technical branches, such
+as applied mechanics, resistance of materials,~etc., would form
+a valuable aid in showing the practical bearing of mathematical
+science. Geometrical drawing and descriptive geometry form
+also a portion of the course. Special exercises in the solution
+of problems, in lecturing,~etc., are arranged in connection with
+the mathematical lectures, so as to bring the students into
+personal contact with the instructors.
+
+I wish, however, to speak here more particularly on the
+higher courses, as these are of more special interest to American
+students. Here specialization is of course necessary.
+Each professor and docent delivers certain lectures specially
+designed for advanced students, in particular for those studying
+for the doctor's degree. Owing to the wide extent of modern
+mathematics, it would be out of the question to cover the whole
+%% -----File: 106.png---Folio 96-------
+field. These lectures are therefore not regularly repeated every
+year; they depend largely on the special line of research that
+happens at the time to engage the attention of the professor.
+In addition to the lectures we have the higher seminaries, whose
+principal object is to guide the student in original investigation
+and give him an opportunity for individual work.
+
+As regards my own higher lectures, I have pursued a certain
+plan in selecting the subjects for different years, my general
+aim being \emph{to gain, in the course of time, a complete view of the
+whole field of modern mathematics, with particular regard to the
+intuitional or} (in the highest sense of the term) \emph{geometrical
+standpoint}. This general tendency you will, I trust, also find
+expressed in this colloquium, in which I have tried to present,
+within certain limits, a general programme of my individual
+work. To carry out this plan in Göttingen, and to bring it to
+the notice of my students, I have, for many years, adopted the
+method of having my higher lectures carefully written out, and,
+in recent years, of having them lithographed, so as to make
+them more readily accessible. These former lectures are at the
+disposal of my hearers for consultation at the mathematical
+reading-room of the university; those that are lithographed can
+be acquired by anybody, and I am much pleased to find them
+so well known here in America.
+
+As another important point, I wish to say that I have always
+regarded my students not merely as hearers or pupils, but as
+collaborators. I want them to take an active part in my own
+researches; and they are therefore particularly welcome if they
+bring with them special knowledge and new ideas, whether
+these be original with them, or derived from some other source,
+from the teachings of other mathematicians. Such men will
+spend their time at Göttingen most profitably to themselves.
+
+I have had the pleasure of seeing many Americans among
+my students, and gladly bear testimony to their great enthusiasm
+%% -----File: 107.png---Folio 97-------
+and energy. Indeed, I do not hesitate to say that, for
+some years, my higher lectures were mainly sustained by students
+whose home is in this country. But I deem it my duty
+to refer here to some difficulties that have occasionally arisen
+in connection with the coming of American students to Göttingen.
+Perhaps a frank statement on my part, at this opportunity,
+will contribute to remove these difficulties in part. What I wish
+to speak of is this. It frequently happens at Göttingen, and
+probably at other German universities as well, that American
+students desire to take the higher courses when their preparation
+is entirely inadequate for such work. A student having
+nothing but an elementary knowledge of the differential and
+integral calculus, usually coupled with hardly a moderate familiarity
+with the German language, makes a decided mistake in
+attempting to attend my advanced lectures. If he comes to Göttingen
+with such a preparation (or, rather, the lack of it), he
+may, of course, enter the more elementary courses offered at our
+university; but this is generally not the object of his coming.
+Would he not do better to spend first a year or two in one of
+the larger American universities? Here he would find more
+readily the transition to specialized studies, and might, at the
+same time, arrive at a clearer judgment of his own mathematical
+ability; this would save him from the severe disappointment
+that might result from his going to Germany.
+
+I trust that these remarks will not be misunderstood. My
+presence here among you is proof enough of the value I attach
+to the coming of American students to Göttingen. It is in
+the interest of those wishing to go there that I speak; and
+for this reason I should be glad to have the widest publicity
+given to what I have said on this point.
+
+Another difficulty lies in the fact that my higher lectures
+have frequently an encyclopedic character, conformably to the
+general tendency of my programme. This is not always just
+%% -----File: 108.png---Folio 98-------
+what is most needful to the American student, whose work
+is naturally directed to gaining the doctor's degree. He will
+need, in addition to what he may derive from my lectures, the
+concentration on a particular subject; and this he will often
+find best with other instructors, at Göttingen or elsewhere.
+I wish to state distinctly that I do not regard it as at all desirable
+that all students should confine their mathematical studies
+to my courses or even to Göttingen. On the contrary, it
+seems to me far preferable that the majority of the students
+should attach themselves to other mathematicians for certain
+special lines of work. My lectures may then serve to form
+the wider background on which these special studies are projected.
+It is in this way, I believe, that my lectures will
+prove of the greatest benefit.
+
+In concluding I wish to thank you for your kind attention,
+and to give expression to the pleasure I have found in meeting
+here at Evanston, so near to Chicago, the great metropolis of
+this commonwealth, a number of enthusiastic devotees of my
+chosen science.
+%% -----File: 109.png---Folio 99-------
+
+\Addendum{The Development of Mathematics}{at the
+German Universities.\protect\footnotemark}
+{By F.~Klein.}
+
+\footnotetext{Translation, with a few slight modifications by the author, of the section \textit{Mathematik}
+ in the work \textit{Die deutschen Universitäten}, Berlin, A.~Asher \&~Co., 1893,
+ prepared by Professor Lexis for the World's Columbian Exposition at Chicago.}
+
+\First{The} eighteenth century laid the firm foundation for the
+development of mathematics in all directions. The universities
+as such, however, did not take a prominent part in this
+work; the \emph{academies} must here be considered of prime importance.
+Nor can any fixed limits of nationality be recognized.
+At the beginning of the period there appears in Germany no
+less a man than \emph{Leibniz}; then follow, among the kindred
+Swiss, the dynasty of the \emph{Bernoullis} and the incomparable
+\emph{Euler}. But the activity of these men, even in its outward
+manifestation, was not confined within narrow geographical
+bounds; to encompass it we must include the Netherlands,
+and in particular Russia, with Germany and Switzerland. On
+the other hand, under Frederick the Great, the most eminent
+French mathematicians, Lagrange, d'Alembert, Maupertuis,
+formed side by side with Euler and Lambert the glory of
+the Berlin Academy. The impulse toward a complete change
+in these conditions came from the French Revolution.
+
+The influence of this great historical event on the development
+of science has manifested itself in two directions.
+On the one hand it has effected a wider separation of nations
+%% -----File: 110.png---Folio 100-------
+with a distinct development of characteristic national qualities.
+Scientific ideas preserve, of course, their universality;
+indeed, international intercourse between scientific men has
+become particularly important for the progress of science;
+but the cultivation and development of scientific thought now
+progress on national bases. The other effect of the French
+Revolution is in the direction of educational methods. The
+decisive event is the foundation of the École polytechnique at
+Paris in~1794. That scientific research and active instruction
+can be directly combined, that lectures alone are not sufficient,
+and must be supplemented by direct personal intercourse
+between the lecturer and his students, that above all it is of
+prime importance to arouse the student's own activity,---these
+are the great principles that owe to this source their recognition
+and acceptance. The example of Paris has been the more
+effective in this direction as it became customary to publish in
+systematic form the lectures delivered at this institution; thus
+arose a series of admirable text-books which remain even now
+the foundation of mathematical study everywhere in Germany.
+Nevertheless, the principal idea kept in view by the founders
+of the Polytechnic School has never taken proper root in the
+German universities. This is the combination of the technical
+with the higher mathematical training. It is true that, primarily,
+this has been a distinct advantage for the unrestricted
+development of theoretical investigation. Our professors, finding
+themselves limited to a small number of students who, as
+future teachers and investigators, would naturally take great
+interest in matters of pure theory, were able to follow the bent
+of their individual predilections with much greater freedom
+than would have been possible otherwise.
+
+But we anticipate our historical account. First of all we
+must characterize the position that Gauss holds in the science
+of this age. Gauss stands in the very front of the new development:
+%% -----File: 111.png---Folio 101-------
+first, by the time of his activity, his publications reaching
+back to the year~1799, and extending throughout the entire
+first half of the nineteenth century; then again, by the wealth of
+new ideas and discoveries that he has brought forward in almost
+every branch of pure and applied mathematics, and which still
+preserve their fruitfulness; finally, by his methods, for Gauss
+was the first to restore that \emph{rigour} of demonstration which we
+admire in the ancients, and which had been forced unduly into
+the background by the exclusive interest of the preceding period
+in \emph{new} developments. And yet I prefer to rank Gauss with
+the great investigators of the eighteenth century, with Euler,
+Lagrange,~etc. He belongs to them by the universality of his
+work, in which no trace as yet appears of that specialization
+which has become the characteristic of our times. He belongs
+to them by his exclusively academic interest, by the absence of
+the modern teaching activity just characterized. We shall have
+a picture of the development of mathematics if we imagine a
+chain of lofty mountains as representative of the men of the
+eighteenth century, terminating in a mighty outlying summit,---\emph{Gauss},---and
+then a broader, hilly country of lower elevation;
+but teeming with new elements of life. More immediately connected
+with Gauss we find in the following period only the
+astronomers and geodesists under the dominating influence of
+\emph{Bessel}; while in theoretical mathematics, as it begins henceforth
+to be independently cultivated in our universities, a new
+epoch begins with the second quarter of the present century,
+marked by the illustrious names of \emph{Jacobi} and \emph{Dirichlet}.
+
+\emph{Jacobi} came originally from Berlin and returned there for
+the closing years of his life (died~1851). But it is the period
+from 1826 to~1843, when he worked at Königsberg with \emph{Bessel}
+and \emph{Franz Neumann}, that must be regarded as the culmination
+of his activity. There he published in~1829 his \textit{Fundamenta
+nova theoriæ functionum ellipticarum}, in which he gave, in
+%% -----File: 112.png---Folio 102-------
+analytic form, a systematic exposition of his own discoveries
+and those of Abel in this field. Then followed a prolonged residence
+in Paris, and finally that remarkable activity as a teacher,
+which still remains without a parallel in stimulating power as
+well as in direct results in the field of pure mathematics. An
+idea of this work can be derived from the lectures on dynamics,
+edited by Clebsch in~1866, and from the complete list of his
+Königsberg lectures as compiled by Kronecker in the seventh
+volume of the \textit{Gesammelte Werke}. The new feature is that
+Jacobi lectured exclusively on those problems on which he was
+working himself, and made it his sole object to introduce his
+students into his own circle of ideas. With this end in view
+he founded, for instance, the first mathematical seminary. And
+so great was his enthusiasm that often he not only gave the
+most important new results of his researches in these lectures,
+but did not even take the time to publish them elsewhere.
+
+\emph{Dirichlet} worked first in Breslau, then for a long period
+(1831--1855) in Berlin, and finally for four years in Göttingen.
+Following Gauss, but at the same time in close connection
+with the contemporary French scholars, he chose mathematical
+physics and the theory of numbers as the central points
+of his scientific activity. It is to be noticed that his interest is
+directed less towards comprehensive developments than towards
+simplicity of conception and questions of principle; these are
+also the considerations on which he insists particularly in his
+lectures. These lectures are characterized by perfect lucidity
+and a certain refined objectivity; they are at the same time
+particularly accessible to the beginner and suggestive in a high
+degree to the more advanced reader. It may be sufficient to
+refer here to his lectures on the theory of numbers, edited by
+Dedekind; they still form the standard text-book on this subject.
+
+With Gauss, Jacobi, Dirichlet, we have named the men who
+have determined the direction of the subsequent development.
+%% -----File: 113.png---Folio 103-------
+We shall now continue our account in a different manner,
+arranging it according to the universities that have been most
+prominent from a mathematical standpoint. For henceforth,
+besides the special achievements of individual workers, the
+principle of co-operation, with its dependence on local conditions,
+comes to have more and more influence on the advancement
+of our science. Setting the upper limit of our account
+about the year~1870, we may name the universities of \emph{Königsberg},
+\emph{Berlin}, \emph{Göttingen}, and \emph{Heidelberg}.
+
+Of Jacobi's activity at Königsberg enough has already been
+said. It may now be added that even after his departure the
+university remained a centre of mathematical instruction.
+\emph{Richelot} and \emph{Hesse} knew how to maintain the high tradition of
+Jacobi, the former on the analytical, the latter on the geometrical
+side. At the same time \emph{Franz Neumann's} lectures on
+mathematical physics began to attract more and more attention
+A stately procession of mathematicians has come from
+Königsberg; there is scarcely a university in Germany to
+which Königsberg has not sent a professor.
+
+Of Berlin, too, we have already anticipated something in our
+account. The years from 1845 to~1851, during which \emph{Jacobi}
+and \emph{Dirichlet} worked together, form the culminating period of
+the first Berlin school. Besides these men the most prominent
+figure is that of \emph{Steiner} (connected with the university
+from 1835 to~1864), the founder of the German synthetic
+geometry. An altogether original character, he was a highly
+effective teacher, owing to the one-sidedness with which he
+developed his geometrical conceptions.---As an event of no
+mean importance, we must here record the foundation (in~1826)
+of \emph{Crelle's} \textit{Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik}. This,
+for decades the only German mathematical periodical, contained
+in its pages the fundamental memoirs of nearly all the eminent
+representatives of the rapidly growing science in Germany.
+%% -----File: 114.png---Folio 104-------
+Among foreign contributions the very first volumes presented
+Abel's pioneer researches. \emph{Crelle} himself conducted this periodical
+for thirty years; then followed \emph{Borchardt}, 1856--1880;
+now the Journal has reached its 110th~volume.---We must
+also mention the formation (in~1844) of the \textit{Berliner physikalische
+Gesellschaft}. Men like \emph{Helmholtz}, \emph{Kirchhoff}, and
+\emph{Clausius} have grown up here; and while these men cannot
+be assigned to mathematics in the narrower sense, their work
+has been productive of important results for our science in
+various ways. During the same period, \emph{Encke} exercised, as
+director of the Berlin astronomical observatory (1825--1862),
+a far-reaching influence by elaborating the methods of astronomical
+calculation on the lines first laid down by Gauss.---We
+leave Berlin at this point, reserving for the present the
+account of the more recent development of mathematics at
+this university.
+
+The discussion of the \emph{Göttingen school} will here find its
+appropriate place. The permanent foundation on which the
+mathematical importance of Göttingen rests is necessarily the
+Gauss tradition. This found, indeed, its direct continuation
+on the physical side when \emph{Wilhelm Weber} returned from
+Leipsic to Göttingen~(1849) and for the first time established
+systematic exercises in those methods of exact electro-magnetic
+measurement that owed their origin to Gauss and himself.
+On the mathematical side several eminent names follow in
+rapid succession. After Gauss's death, Dirichlet was called
+as his successor and transferred his great activity as a teacher
+to Göttingen, for only too brief a period (1855--59). By his
+side grew up \emph{Riemann} (1854--66), to be followed later by
+\emph{Clebsch} (1868--72).
+
+Riemann takes root in Gauss and Dirichlet; on the other
+hand he fully assimilated Cauchy's ideas as to the use of
+complex variables. Thus arose his profound creations in the
+%% -----File: 115.png---Folio 105-------
+theory of functions which ever since have proved a rich and
+permanent source of the most suggestive material. Clebsch
+sustains, so to speak, a complementary relation to Riemann.
+Coming originally from Königsberg, and occupied with mathematical
+physics, he had found during the period of his work
+at Giessen (1863--68) the particular direction which he afterwards
+followed so successfully at Göttingen. Well acquainted
+with the work of Jacobi and with modern geometry, he introduced
+into these fields the results of the algebraic researches of
+the English mathematicians Cayley and Sylvester, and on the
+double foundation thus constructed, proceeded to build up new
+approaches to the problems of the entire theory of functions,
+and in particular to Riemann's own developments. But with
+this the significance of Clebsch for the development of our
+science is not completely characterized. A man of vivid imagination
+who readily entered into the ideas of others, he influenced
+his students far beyond the limits of direct instruction;
+of an active and enterprising character, he founded, together
+with C.~Neumann in Leipsic, a new periodical, the \textit{Mathematische
+Annalen}, which has since been regularly continued,
+and is just concluding its 41st~volume.
+
+We recall further those memorable years of Heidelberg, from
+1855 to perhaps~1870. Here were delivered Hesse's elegant
+and widely read lectures on analytic geometry. Here Kirchhoff
+produced his lectures on mathematical physics. Here,
+above all, Helmholtz completed his great papers on mathematical
+physics, which in their turn served as basis for Kirchhoff's
+elegant later researches.
+
+It remains now to speak of the \emph{second Berlin school}, beginning
+also about the middle of the century, but still operating upon
+the present age. \emph{Kummer}, \emph{Kronecker}, \emph{Weierstrass}, have been
+its leaders, the first two, as students of Dirichlet, pre-eminently
+engaged in developing the theory of numbers, while the last,
+%% -----File: 116.png---Folio 106-------
+leaning more on Jacobi and Cauchy, became, together with
+Riemann, the creator of the modern theory of functions.
+Kummer's lectures can here merely be named in passing;
+with their clear arrangement and exposition they have always
+proved especially useful to the majority of students, without
+being particularly notable for their specific contents. Quite
+different is the case of Kronecker and Weierstrass, whose
+lectures became in the course of time more and more the
+expression of their scientific individuality. To a certain extent
+both have thrust intuitional methods into the background
+and, on the other hand, have in a measure avoided
+the long formal developments of our science, applying themselves
+with so much the keener criticism to the fundamental
+analytical ideas. In this direction Kronecker has gone even
+farther than Weierstrass in trying to banish altogether the
+idea of the irrational number, and to reduce all developments
+to relations between integers alone. The tendencies thus
+characterized have exerted a wide-felt influence, and give a
+distinctive character to a large part of our present mathematical
+investigations.
+
+We have thus sketched in general outlines the state reached
+by our science about the year~1870. It is impossible to carry
+our account beyond this date in a similar form. For the developments
+that now arise are not yet finished; the persons whom
+we should have to name are still in the midst of their creative
+activity. All we can do is to add a few remarks of a more
+general nature on the present aspect of mathematical science
+in Germany. Before doing this, however, we must supplement
+the preceding account in two directions.
+
+Let it above all be emphasized that even within the limits
+here chosen, we have by no means exhausted the subject. It
+is, indeed, characteristic of the German universities that their
+life is not wholly centralized,---that wherever a leader appears,
+%% -----File: 117.png---Folio 107-------
+he will find a sphere of activity. We may name here, from an
+earlier period, the acute analyst \textit{J.~Fr.~Pfaff}, who worked in
+Helmstädt and Halle from 1788 to~1825, and, at one time, had
+Gauss among his students. Pfaff was the first representative
+of the \emph{combinatory} school, which, for a time, played a great rôle
+in different German universities, but was finally pushed aside in
+the manifold development of the advancing science. We must
+further mention the three great geometers, \emph{Möbius} in Leipsic,
+\emph{Plücker} in Bonn, \emph{von~Staudt} in Erlangen. Möbius was, at the
+same time, an astronomer, and conducted the Leipsic observatory
+from 1816 till~1868. Plücker, again, devoted only the first
+half of his productive period (1826--46) to mathematics, turning
+his attention later to experimental physics (where his researches
+are well known), and only returning to geometrical investigation
+towards the close of his life (1864--68). The accidental circumstance
+that each of these three men worked as teacher only in
+a narrow circle has kept the development of modern geometry
+unduly in the background in our sketch. Passing beyond
+university circles, we may be allowed to add the name of
+\emph{Grassmann}, of Stettin, who, in his \textit{Ausdehnungslehre} (1844 and~1862),
+conceived a system embracing the results of modern
+geometrical speculation, and, from a very different field, that of
+\emph{Hansen}, of Gotha, the celebrated representative of theoretical
+astronomy.
+
+We must also mention, in a few words, the \emph{development of
+technical education}. About the middle of the century, it became
+the custom to call mathematicians of scientific eminence to the
+polytechnic schools. Foremost in this respect stands Zürich,
+which, in spite of the political boundaries, may here be counted
+as our own; indeed, quite a number of professors have taught
+in the Zürich polytechnic school who are to-day ornaments of
+the German universities. Thus the ideal of the Paris school,
+the combination of mathematical with technical education,
+%% -----File: 118.png---Folio 108-------
+became again more prominent. A considerable influence in
+this direction was exercised by \emph{Redtenbacher's} lectures on the
+theory of machines which attracted to Carlsruhe an ever-increasing
+number of enthusiastic students. Descriptive geometry and
+kinematics were scientifically elaborated. \emph{Culmann} of Zürich,
+in creating graphical statics, introduced the principles of modern
+geometry, in the happiest manner, into mechanics. In connection
+with the scientific advance thus outlined, numerous new
+polytechnic schools were founded in Germany about 1870 and
+during the following years, and some of the older schools were
+reorganized. At Munich and Dresden, in particular, in accordance
+with the example of Zürich, special departments for the
+training of teachers and professors were established. The
+polytechnic schools have thus attained great importance for
+mathematical education as well as for the advancement of the
+science. We must forbear to pursue more closely the many
+interesting questions that present themselves in this connection.
+
+If we survey the entire field of development described above,
+this, at any rate, appears as the obvious conclusion, in Germany
+as elsewhere, that the number of those who have an earnest
+interest in mathematics has increased very rapidly and that, as a
+consequence, the amount of mathematical production has grown
+to enormous proportions. In this respect an imperative need
+was supplied when \emph{Ohrtmann} and \emph{Müller} established in Berlin
+(1869) an annual bibliographical review, \textit{Die Fortschritte der
+Mathematik}, of which the 21st~volume has just appeared.
+
+In conclusion a few words should here be said concerning the
+modern development of university instruction. The principal
+effort has been to reduce the difficulty of mathematical study
+by improving the seminary arrangements and equipments.
+Not only have special seminary libraries been formed, but
+study rooms have been set aside in which these libraries
+are immediately accessible to the students. Collections of
+%% -----File: 119.png---Folio 109-------
+mathematical models and courses in drawing are calculated
+to disarm, in part at least, the hostility directed against the
+excessive abstractness of the university instruction. And
+while the students find everywhere inducements to specialized
+study, as is indeed necessary if our science is to flourish, yet
+the tendency has at the same time gained ground to emphasize
+more and more the mutual interdependence of the different
+special branches. Here the individual can accomplish but
+little; it seems necessary that many co-operate for the same
+purpose. Such considerations have led in recent years to the
+formation of a German mathematical association (\textit{Deutsche
+Mathematiker-Vereinigung}). The first annual report just issued
+(which contains a detailed report on the development of the
+theory of invariants) and a comprehensive catalogue of mathematical
+models and apparatus published at the same time indicate
+the direction that is here to be followed. With the
+present means of publication and the continually increasing
+number of new memoirs, it has become almost impossible to
+survey comprehensively the different branches of mathematics.
+Hence it is the object of the association to collect, systematize,
+maintain communication, in order that the work and
+progress of the science may not be hampered by material
+difficulties. Progress itself, however, remains---in mathematics
+even more than in other sciences---always the right
+and the achievement of the individual.
+
+{\footnotesize\textsc{Göttingen}, January, 1893.}
+%% -----File: 120.png---Folio 110-------
+%[Blank Page]
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% GUTENBERG LICENSE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\cleardoublepage
+
+\backmatter
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Back Matter}{Back Matter}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG License}{Project Gutenberg License}
+\fancyhead[C]{\textsc{LICENSING}}
+
+\begin{PGtext}
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on
+Mathematics, by Felix Klein
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM ***
+
+***** This file should be named 36154-pdf.pdf or 36154-pdf.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/6/1/5/36154/
+
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Brenda Lewis, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images from the Cornell University
+Library: Historical Mathematics Monographs collection.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+\end{PGtext}
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on
+% Mathematics, by Felix Klein %
+% %
+% *** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM *** %
+% %
+% ***** This file should be named 36154-t.tex or 36154-t.zip ***** %
+% This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: %
+% http://www.gutenberg.org/3/6/1/5/36154/ %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\end{document}
+###
+@ControlwordReplace = (
+ ['\\Preface', 'PREFACE'],
+ ['\\ie', 'i.e.']
+ );
+
+@ControlwordArguments = (
+ ['\\pdfbookmark', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Lecture', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, 'Lecture ', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Addendum', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Input', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Figure', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\WFigure', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Figures', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPtypo', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPnote', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\pageref', 1, 0, '', '00'],
+ ['\\linestretch', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Date', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Name', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\First', 1, 1, '', '']
+ );
+###
+This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) (format=pdflatex 2010.5.6) 18 MAY 2011 11:49
+entering extended mode
+ %&-line parsing enabled.
+**36154-t.tex
+(./36154-t.tex
+LaTeX2e <2005/12/01>
+Babel <v3.8h> and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumylang, noh
+yphenation, arabic, farsi, croatian, ukrainian, russian, bulgarian, czech, slov
+ak, danish, dutch, finnish, basque, french, german, ngerman, ibycus, greek, mon
+ogreek, ancientgreek, hungarian, italian, latin, mongolian, norsk, icelandic, i
+nterlingua, turkish, coptic, romanian, welsh, serbian, slovenian, estonian, esp
+eranto, uppersorbian, indonesian, polish, portuguese, spanish, catalan, galicia
+n, swedish, ukenglish, pinyin, loaded.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/book.cls
+Document Class: book 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/bk12.clo
+File: bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+)
+\c@part=\count79
+\c@chapter=\count80
+\c@section=\count81
+\c@subsection=\count82
+\c@subsubsection=\count83
+\c@paragraph=\count84
+\c@subparagraph=\count85
+\c@figure=\count86
+\c@table=\count87
+\abovecaptionskip=\skip41
+\belowcaptionskip=\skip42
+\bibindent=\dimen102
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty
+Package: inputenc 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+\inpenc@prehook=\toks14
+\inpenc@posthook=\toks15
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/latin1.def
+File: latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty
+Package: ifthen 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsmath.sty
+Package: amsmath 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+\@mathmargin=\skip43
+For additional information on amsmath, use the `?' option.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amstext.sty
+Package: amstext 2000/06/29 v2.01
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsgen.sty
+File: amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+\@emptytoks=\toks16
+\ex@=\dimen103
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsbsy.sty
+Package: amsbsy 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+\pmbraise@=\dimen104
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsopn.sty
+Package: amsopn 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+)
+\inf@bad=\count88
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \frac on input line 211.
+\uproot@=\count89
+\leftroot@=\count90
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \overline on input line 307.
+\classnum@=\count91
+\DOTSCASE@=\count92
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ldots on input line 379.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \dots on input line 382.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \cdots on input line 467.
+\Mathstrutbox@=\box26
+\strutbox@=\box27
+\big@size=\dimen105
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OML on input line 567.
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OMS on input line 568.
+\macc@depth=\count93
+\c@MaxMatrixCols=\count94
+\dotsspace@=\muskip10
+\c@parentequation=\count95
+\dspbrk@lvl=\count96
+\tag@help=\toks17
+\row@=\count97
+\column@=\count98
+\maxfields@=\count99
+\andhelp@=\toks18
+\eqnshift@=\dimen106
+\alignsep@=\dimen107
+\tagshift@=\dimen108
+\tagwidth@=\dimen109
+\totwidth@=\dimen110
+\lineht@=\dimen111
+\@envbody=\toks19
+\multlinegap=\skip44
+\multlinetaggap=\skip45
+\mathdisplay@stack=\toks20
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \[ on input line 2666.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \] on input line 2667.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amssymb.sty
+Package: amssymb 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amsfonts.sty
+Package: amsfonts 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+\symAMSa=\mathgroup4
+\symAMSb=\mathgroup5
+LaTeX Font Info: Overwriting math alphabet `\mathfrak' in version `bold'
+(Font) U/euf/m/n --> U/euf/b/n on input line 132.
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/alltt.sty
+Package: alltt 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/footmisc/footmisc.sty
+Package: footmisc 2005/03/17 v5.3d a miscellany of footnote facilities
+\FN@temptoken=\toks21
+\footnotemargin=\dimen112
+\c@pp@next@reset=\count100
+\c@@fnserial=\count101
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style bringhurst on input line 817.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style chicago on input line 818.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style wiley on input line 819.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style lamport-robust on input line 823.
+
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style lamport* on input line 831.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style lamport*-robust on input line 840
+.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/bigfoot/perpage.sty
+Package: perpage 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+\c@abspage=\count102
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
+Package: caption 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption3.sty
+Package: caption3 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty
+Package: keyval 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+\KV@toks@=\toks22
+)
+\captionmargin=\dimen113
+\captionmarginx=\dimen114
+\captionwidth=\dimen115
+\captionindent=\dimen116
+\captionparindent=\dimen117
+\captionhangindent=\dimen118
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphicx.sty
+Package: graphicx 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphics.sty
+Package: graphics 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/trig.sty
+Package: trig 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/graphics.cfg
+File: graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package graphics Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 90.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/pdftex-def/pdftex.def
+File: pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+\Gread@gobject=\count103
+))
+\Gin@req@height=\dimen119
+\Gin@req@width=\dimen120
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/wrapfig/wrapfig.sty
+\wrapoverhang=\dimen121
+\WF@size=\dimen122
+\c@WF@wrappedlines=\count104
+\WF@box=\box28
+\WF@everypar=\toks23
+Package: wrapfig 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/indentfirst.sty
+Package: indentfirst 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/textcase/textcase.sty
+Package: textcase 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/yfonts/yfonts.sty
+Package: yfonts 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/calc.sty
+Package: calc 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+\calc@Acount=\count105
+\calc@Bcount=\count106
+\calc@Adimen=\dimen123
+\calc@Bdimen=\dimen124
+\calc@Askip=\skip46
+\calc@Bskip=\skip47
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \setlength on input line 75.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \addtolength on input line 76.
+\calc@Ccount=\count107
+\calc@Cskip=\skip48
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/fancyhdr/fancyhdr.sty
+\fancy@headwidth=\skip49
+\f@ncyO@elh=\skip50
+\f@ncyO@erh=\skip51
+\f@ncyO@olh=\skip52
+\f@ncyO@orh=\skip53
+\f@ncyO@elf=\skip54
+\f@ncyO@erf=\skip55
+\f@ncyO@olf=\skip56
+\f@ncyO@orf=\skip57
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/geometry/geometry.sty
+Package: geometry 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+\Gm@cnth=\count108
+\Gm@cntv=\count109
+\c@Gm@tempcnt=\count110
+\Gm@bindingoffset=\dimen125
+\Gm@wd@mp=\dimen126
+\Gm@odd@mp=\dimen127
+\Gm@even@mp=\dimen128
+\Gm@dimlist=\toks24
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/xelatex/xetexconfig/geometry.cfg)) (/usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty
+Package: hyperref 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+\@linkdim=\dimen129
+\Hy@linkcounter=\count111
+\Hy@pagecounter=\count112
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/pd1enc.def
+File: pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/hyperref.cfg
+File: hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/kvoptions.sty
+Package: kvoptions 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (
+HO)
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Option `hyperfootnotes' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `linktocpage' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfdisplaydoctitle' set `true' on input line 223
+8.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfpagelabels' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarksopen' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `colorlinks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 2288.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 2293.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 2296.
+Package hyperref Info: Plain pages OFF on input line 2303.
+Package hyperref Info: Backreferencing OFF on input line 2308.
+Implicit mode ON; LaTeX internals redefined
+Package hyperref Info: Bookmarks ON on input line 2444.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ltxmisc/url.sty
+\Urlmuskip=\muskip11
+Package: url 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \url on input line 2599.
+\Fld@menulength=\count113
+\Field@Width=\dimen130
+\Fld@charsize=\dimen131
+\Choice@toks=\toks25
+\Field@toks=\toks26
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 3102.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 3107.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 3110.
+Package hyperref Info: backreferencing OFF on input line 3117.
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 3120.
+\Hy@abspage=\count114
+\c@Item=\count115
+)
+*hyperref using driver hpdftex*
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hpdftex.def
+File: hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+\Fld@listcount=\count116
+)
+\c@pp@a@footnote=\count117
+\TmpLen=\skip58
+\c@figno=\count118
+(./36154-t.aux)
+\openout1 = `36154-t.aux'.
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LY/yfrak/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LYG/ygoth/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for PD1/pdf/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ragged2e/ragged2e.sty
+Package: ragged2e 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/everysel/everysel.sty
+Package: everysel 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \selectfont on input line 125.
+)
+\CenteringLeftskip=\skip59
+\RaggedLeftLeftskip=\skip60
+\RaggedRightLeftskip=\skip61
+\CenteringRightskip=\skip62
+\RaggedLeftRightskip=\skip63
+\RaggedRightRightskip=\skip64
+\CenteringParfillskip=\skip65
+\RaggedLeftParfillskip=\skip66
+\RaggedRightParfillskip=\skip67
+\JustifyingParfillskip=\skip68
+\CenteringParindent=\skip69
+\RaggedLeftParindent=\skip70
+\RaggedRightParindent=\skip71
+\JustifyingParindent=\skip72
+)
+Package caption Info: hyperref package v6.74m (or newer) detected on input line
+ 443.
+(/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/supp-pdf.tex
+[Loading MPS to PDF converter (version 2006.09.02).]
+\scratchcounter=\count119
+\scratchdimen=\dimen132
+\scratchbox=\box29
+\nofMPsegments=\count120
+\nofMParguments=\count121
+\everyMPshowfont=\toks27
+\MPscratchCnt=\count122
+\MPscratchDim=\dimen133
+\MPnumerator=\count123
+\everyMPtoPDFconversion=\toks28
+)
+-------------------- Geometry parameters
+paper: class default
+landscape: --
+twocolumn: --
+twoside: true
+asymmetric: --
+h-parts: 9.03375pt, 361.34999pt, 9.03375pt
+v-parts: 13.98709pt, 543.19225pt, 20.98065pt
+hmarginratio: 1:1
+vmarginratio: 2:3
+lines: --
+heightrounded: --
+bindingoffset: 0.0pt
+truedimen: --
+includehead: true
+includefoot: true
+includemp: --
+driver: pdftex
+-------------------- Page layout dimensions and switches
+\paperwidth 379.4175pt
+\paperheight 578.15999pt
+\textwidth 361.34999pt
+\textheight 481.31845pt
+\oddsidemargin -63.23624pt
+\evensidemargin -63.23624pt
+\topmargin -58.2829pt
+\headheight 12.0pt
+\headsep 19.8738pt
+\footskip 30.0pt
+\marginparwidth 98.0pt
+\marginparsep 7.0pt
+\columnsep 10.0pt
+\skip\footins 10.8pt plus 4.0pt minus 2.0pt
+\hoffset 0.0pt
+\voffset 0.0pt
+\mag 1000
+\@twosidetrue \@mparswitchtrue
+(1in=72.27pt, 1cm=28.45pt)
+-----------------------
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/color.sty
+Package: color 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+(/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/color.cfg
+File: color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package color Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 130.
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 443.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty
+Package: nameref 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/refcount.sty
+Package: refcount 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+)
+\c@section@level=\count124
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ref on input line 443.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \pageref on input line 443.
+(./36154-t.out) (./36154-t.out)
+\@outlinefile=\write3
+\openout3 = `36154-t.out'.
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msa on input line 483.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsa.fd
+File: umsa.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msb on input line 483.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsb.fd
+File: umsb.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+) [1
+
+{/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] [2
+
+] [1
+
+] <./images/illo002.png, id=109, 227.85126pt x 89.33376pt>
+File: ./images/illo002.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo002.png> [2 <./images/illo002.png (PNG copy)>] [3] [4] [5
+
+] [6] [7] (./36154-t.toc)
+\tf@toc=\write4
+\openout4 = `36154-t.toc'.
+
+
+Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 1--730
+
+ []
+
+[8
+
+] [1
+
+
+] [2] [3] [4]
+Underfull \hbox (badness 4096) in paragraph at lines 941--941
+[][]\OT1/cmr/m/it/10 Ueber zwei Ber^^?uhrungsprobleme\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 , Vol. 4 (
+1871), pp. 527--549.---\OT1/cmr/m/it/10 Ueber
+ []
+
+[5] [6] [7] [8
+
+] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16
+
+] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] <./images/illo036.png, id=289, 594.22pt x 258.9
+675pt>
+File: ./images/illo036.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo036.png> [23
+
+] [24 <./images/illo036.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/illo037.png, id=303, 166.622
+5pt x 167.62625pt>
+File: ./images/illo037.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo037.png> <./images/illo038.png, id=307, 189.70876pt x 194.727
+5pt>
+File: ./images/illo038.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo038.png> [25 <./images/illo037.png (PNG copy)>] [26 <./images
+/illo038.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/illo039.png, id=322, 236.885pt x 334.24875p
+t>
+File: ./images/illo039.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo039.png> <./images/illo041.png, id=325, 257.96375pt x 287.072
+5pt>
+File: ./images/illo041.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo041.png> [27 <./images/illo039.png (PNG copy)>] [28 <./images
+/illo041.png (PNG copy)>] [29] [30] [31
+
+] [32] <./images/illo045.png, id=361, 611.28375pt x 166.6225pt>
+File: ./images/illo045.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo045.png> [33 <./images/illo045.png (PNG copy)>] [34] <./image
+s/illo047a.png, id=376, 217.81375pt x 251.94125pt>
+File: ./images/illo047a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo047a.png> <./images/illo047b.png, id=377, 226.8475pt x 226.84
+75pt>
+File: ./images/illo047b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo047b.png> [35 <./images/illo047a.png (PNG copy)> <./images/il
+lo047b.png (PNG copy)>] [36] [37] [38
+
+] <./images/illo052.png, id=402, 213.79875pt x 78.2925pt>
+File: ./images/illo052.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo052.png> <./images/illo053.png, id=405, 362.35374pt x 373.395
+pt>
+File: ./images/illo053.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo053.png> [39 <./images/illo052.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/ill
+o054.png, id=415, 298.11375pt x 244.915pt>
+File: ./images/illo054.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo054.png> [40 <./images/illo053.png (PNG copy)>] [41 <./images
+/illo054.png (PNG copy)>] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47
+
+] [48] [49] [50] [51] <./images/illo066.png, id=490, 277.035pt x 209.78375pt>
+File: ./images/illo066.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo066.png> [52 <./images/illo066.png (PNG copy)>] [53
+
+] <./images/illo070.png, id=508, 514.92375pt x 376.40625pt>
+File: ./images/illo070.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo070.png> [54] [55 <./images/illo070.png (PNG copy)>] <./image
+s/illo072.png, id=521, 482.80376pt x 350.30875pt>
+File: ./images/illo072.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo072.png> [56] <./images/illo073.png, id=528, 284.06125pt x 21
+8.8175pt>
+File: ./images/illo073.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo073.png> [57 <./images/illo072.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/ill
+o074.png, id=538, 303.1325pt x 250.9375pt>
+File: ./images/illo074.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo074.png> [58 <./images/illo073.png (PNG copy)>] [59 <./images
+/illo074.png (PNG copy)>] [60] [61] [62
+
+] <./images/illo079a.png, id=566, 630.355pt x 218.8175pt>
+File: ./images/illo079a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo079a.png> <./images/illo079b.png, id=568, 203.76125pt x 191.7
+1625pt>
+File: ./images/illo079b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo079b.png> [63]
+Underfull \hbox (badness 1173) in paragraph at lines 3151--3166
+[]\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 The tri-an-gles cor-re-spond-ing to the up-per
+ []
+
+[64 <./images/illo079a.png (PNG copy)> <./images/illo079b.png (PNG copy)>] <./i
+mages/illo081.png, id=586, 620.3175pt x 209.78375pt>
+File: ./images/illo081.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo081.png> [65 <./images/illo081.png (PNG copy)>] [66] [67]
+Underfull \hbox (badness 4927) in paragraph at lines 3337--3337
+[][]\OT1/cmr/m/it/10 Ueber die quatern^^?are, endliche, lin-eare Sub-sti-tu-tio
+n-s-gruppe der Bor-
+ []
+
+[68] [69] [70
+
+] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79
+
+] [80] [81] [82] [83] <./images/illo101a.png, id=675, 320.19624pt x 123.46124pt
+>
+File: ./images/illo101a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo101a.png> <./images/illo101b.png, id=676, 244.915pt x 298.113
+75pt>
+File: ./images/illo101b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo101b.png> [84 <./images/illo101a.png (PNG copy)>] [85 <./imag
+es/illo101b.png (PNG copy)>] [86] [87
+
+] [88] [89] [90] [91
+
+] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101
+
+
+] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] (./36154-t.aux)
+
+ *File List*
+ book.cls 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+ bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+inputenc.sty 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ ifthen.sty 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+ amsmath.sty 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+ amstext.sty 2000/06/29 v2.01
+ amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+ amsbsy.sty 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+ amsopn.sty 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+ amssymb.sty 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+amsfonts.sty 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+ alltt.sty 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+footmisc.sty 2005/03/17 v5.3d a miscellany of footnote facilities
+ perpage.sty 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+ caption.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+caption3.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+ keyval.sty 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+graphicx.sty 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+graphics.sty 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+ trig.sty 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+ wrapfig.sty 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+indentfirst.sty 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+textcase.sty 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+ yfonts.sty 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+ calc.sty 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+fancyhdr.sty
+geometry.sty 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+geometry.cfg
+hyperref.sty 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+ pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+kvoptions.sty 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (HO
+)
+ url.sty 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+ hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+ragged2e.sty 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+everysel.sty 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+supp-pdf.tex
+ color.sty 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+ color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ nameref.sty 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+refcount.sty 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+ 36154-t.out
+ 36154-t.out
+ umsa.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+ umsb.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+./images/illo002.png
+./images/illo036.png
+./images/illo037.png
+./images/illo038.png
+./images/illo039.png
+./images/illo041.png
+./images/illo045.png
+./images/illo047a.png
+./images/illo047b.png
+./images/illo052.png
+./images/illo053.png
+./images/illo054.png
+./images/illo066.png
+./images/illo070.png
+./images/illo072.png
+./images/illo073.png
+./images/illo074.png
+./images/illo079a.png
+./images/illo079b.png
+./images/illo081.png
+./images/illo101a.png
+./images/illo101b.png
+ ***********
+
+ )
+Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
+ 5735 strings out of 94074
+ 79136 string characters out of 1165154
+ 139269 words of memory out of 1500000
+ 8654 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+50000
+ 17959 words of font info for 68 fonts, out of 1200000 for 2000
+ 647 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
+ 34i,14n,43p,1166b,484s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,6000p,200000b,5000s
+</usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmbx12.pfb></usr/share/texmf
+-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmcsc10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/typ
+e1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi1
+0.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi12.pfb></usr/share/t
+exmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi6.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/t
+ype1/bluesky/cm/cmmi7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi
+8.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/ty
+pe1/bluesky/cm/cmr17.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr6.
+pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr8.pfb></usr/share/texmf
+-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type
+1/bluesky/cm/cmsy7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy8.p
+fb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmti10.pfb></usr/share/texm
+f-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmti12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/typ
+e1/bluesky/cm/cmti8.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmtt9.
+pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/ams/msam10.pfb></usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/gothic/ygoth.pfb>
+Output written on 36154-t.pdf (119 pages, 577424 bytes).
+PDF statistics:
+ 922 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
+ 240 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 131072)
+ 287 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)
+
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo002.png b/36154-t/images/illo002.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ec9435e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo002.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo036.png b/36154-t/images/illo036.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..521bcb6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo036.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo037.png b/36154-t/images/illo037.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f4c40a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo037.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo038.png b/36154-t/images/illo038.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..32d3e22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo038.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo039.png b/36154-t/images/illo039.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7dfccb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo039.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo041.png b/36154-t/images/illo041.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a1f25b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo041.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo045.png b/36154-t/images/illo045.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ea2461a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo045.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo047a.png b/36154-t/images/illo047a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d65aa0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo047a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo047b.png b/36154-t/images/illo047b.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5c55781
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo047b.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo052.png b/36154-t/images/illo052.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b784a69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo052.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo053.png b/36154-t/images/illo053.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9af574f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo053.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo054.png b/36154-t/images/illo054.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8692da0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo054.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo066.png b/36154-t/images/illo066.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d2b5e1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo066.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo070.png b/36154-t/images/illo070.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dceb435
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo070.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo072.png b/36154-t/images/illo072.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9c2bd3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo072.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo073.png b/36154-t/images/illo073.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2670936
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo073.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo074.png b/36154-t/images/illo074.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca0679e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo074.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo079a.png b/36154-t/images/illo079a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e77f77a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo079a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo079b.png b/36154-t/images/illo079b.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d0a3bba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo079b.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo081.png b/36154-t/images/illo081.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..391f736
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo081.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo101a.png b/36154-t/images/illo101a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9324d6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo101a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/images/illo101b.png b/36154-t/images/illo101b.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dbd9886
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/images/illo101b.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36154-t/old/36154-t.tex b/36154-t/old/36154-t.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8fd28cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/old/36154-t.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,5594 @@
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on %
+% Mathematics, by Felix Klein %
+% %
+% This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with %
+% almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or %
+% re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included %
+% with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org %
+% %
+% %
+% Title: The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on Mathematics %
+% Delivered From Aug. 28 to Sept. 9, 1893 Before Members of %
+% the Congress of Mathematics Held in Connection with the %
+% World's Fair in Chicago %
+% %
+% Author: Felix Klein %
+% %
+% Release Date: May 18, 2011 [EBook #36154] %
+% %
+% Language: English %
+% %
+% Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 %
+% %
+% *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM *** %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\def\ebook{36154}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%% %%
+%% Packages and substitutions: %%
+%% %%
+%% book: Required. %%
+%% inputenc: Standard DP encoding. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% ifthen: Logical conditionals. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% amsmath: AMS mathematics enhancements. Required. %%
+%% amssymb: Additional mathematical symbols. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% alltt: Fixed-width font environment. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% footmisc: Extended footnote capabilities. Required. %%
+%% perpage: Start footnote numbering on each page. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% indentfirst: Indent first word of each sectional unit. Optional. %%
+%% textcase: Apply \MakeUppercase (et al.) only to text, not math. %%
+%% Required. %%
+%% yfonts: Gothic snippets in the copyright material. Optional. %%
+%% %%
+%% calc: Length calculations. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% fancyhdr: Enhanced running headers and footers. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% caption: Configurable caption styles. Required. %%
+%% graphicx: Standard interface for graphics inclusion. Required. %%
+%% wrapfig: Illustrations surrounded by text. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% geometry: Enhanced page layout package. Required. %%
+%% hyperref: Hypertext embellishments for pdf output. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Producer's Comments: %%
+%% %%
+%% Changes are noted in this file in three ways. %%
+%% 1. \DPnote{} for in-line `placeholder' notes. %%
+%% 2. \DPtypo{}{} for typographical corrections, showing original %%
+%% and replacement text side-by-side. %%
+%% 3. [** TN: Note]s for lengthier or stylistic comments. %%
+%% %%
+%% With a small number of exceptions, journal titles in the book %%
+%% are italicized in running text and not italicized in footnotes. %%
+%% Instances have been noted and made consistent. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compilation Flags: %%
+%% %%
+%% The following behavior may be controlled by boolean flags. %%
+%% %%
+%% ForPrinting (false by default): %%
+%% Compile a screen-optimized PDF file. Set to false for print- %%
+%% optimized file (pages cropped, one-sided, blue hyperlinks). %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% PDF pages: 119 (if ForPrinting set to false) %%
+%% PDF page size: 5.25 x 8" (non-standard) %%
+%% PDF bookmarks: created, point to ToC entries %%
+%% PDF document info: filled in %%
+%% Images: 22 png diagrams %%
+%% %%
+%% Summary of log file: %%
+%% %%
+%% * Four underfull hboxes. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compile History: %%
+%% %%
+%% May, 2011: adhere (Andrew D. Hwang) %%
+%% texlive2007, GNU/Linux %%
+%% %%
+%% Command block: %%
+%% %%
+%% pdflatex x2 %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% May 2011: pglatex. %%
+%% Compile this project with: %%
+%% pdflatex 36154-t.tex ..... TWO times %%
+%% %%
+%% pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) %%
+%% %%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\listfiles
+\documentclass[12pt]{book}[2005/09/16]
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% PACKAGES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}[2006/05/05]
+
+\usepackage{ifthen}[2001/05/26] %% Logical conditionals
+
+\usepackage{amsmath}[2000/07/18] %% Displayed equations
+\usepackage{amssymb}[2002/01/22] %% and additional symbols
+
+\usepackage{alltt}[1997/06/16] %% boilerplate, credits, license
+
+ %% extended footnote capabilities
+\usepackage[symbol,perpage]{footmisc}[2005/03/17]
+\usepackage{perpage}[2006/07/15]
+
+\usepackage[font=footnotesize,labelformat=empty]{caption}[2007/01/07]
+\usepackage{graphicx}[1999/02/16]%% For diagrams
+\usepackage{wrapfig}[2003/01/31] %% and wrapping text around them
+
+\usepackage{indentfirst}[1995/11/23]
+\usepackage{textcase}[2004/10/07]
+
+\IfFileExists{yfonts.sty}{%
+ \usepackage{yfonts}[2003/01/08]
+}{%
+ \providecommand{\textgoth}[1]{\textbf{#1}}
+}
+
+\usepackage{calc}[2005/08/06]
+
+% for running heads
+\usepackage{fancyhdr}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% Interlude: Set up PRINTING (default) or SCREEN VIEWING %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+% ForPrinting=true (default) false
+% Asymmetric margins Symmetric margins
+% Black hyperlinks Blue hyperlinks
+% Start Preface, ToC, etc. recto No blank verso pages
+%
+% Chapter-like ``Sections'' start both recto and verso in the scanned
+% book. This behavior has been retained.
+\newboolean{ForPrinting}
+
+%% UNCOMMENT the next line for a PRINT-OPTIMIZED VERSION of the text %%
+%\setboolean{ForPrinting}{true}
+
+%% Initialize values to ForPrinting=false
+\newcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=1:1} % Symmetric margins
+\newcommand{\HLinkColor}{blue} % Hyperlink color
+\newcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{SinglePage}
+\newcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+\newcommand{\TransNoteCommon}{%
+ This book was produced from images provided by the Cornell
+ University Library: Historical Mathematics Monographs collection.
+ \bigskip
+
+ Minor typographical corrections and presentational changes have
+ been made without comment.
+ \bigskip
+}
+
+\newcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for screen viewing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for printing. Please see the preamble of the \LaTeX\
+ source file for instructions.
+}
+%% Re-set if ForPrinting=true
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \renewcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=2:3} % Asymmetric margins
+ \renewcommand{\HLinkColor}{black} % Hyperlink color
+ \renewcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{TwoPageRight}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for printing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for screen viewing. Please see the preamble of the
+ \LaTeX\ source file for instructions.
+ }
+}{% If ForPrinting=false, don't skip to recto
+ \renewcommand{\cleardoublepage}{\clearpage}
+}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% End of PRINTING/SCREEN VIEWING code; back to packages %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in}%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}%
+ \usepackage[body={5in,6.66in},\Margins]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{5.25in}%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{8in}%
+ \raggedbottom
+ \usepackage[body={5in,6.66in},\Margins,includeheadfoot]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+}
+
+\providecommand{\ebook}{00000} % Overridden during white-washing
+\usepackage[pdftex,
+ hyperfootnotes=false,
+ pdftitle={The Project Gutenberg eBook \#\ebook: The Evanston Colloquium},
+ pdfauthor={Felix Klein},
+ pdfkeywords={Brenda Lewis, Andrew D. Hwang,
+ Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team,
+ Cornell University Historical Mathematical Monographs Collection},
+ pdfstartview=Fit, % default value
+ pdfstartpage=1, % default value
+ pdfpagemode=UseNone, % default value
+ bookmarks=true, % default value
+ linktocpage=false, % default value
+ pdfpagelayout=\PDFPageLayout,
+ pdfdisplaydoctitle,
+ pdfpagelabels=true,
+ bookmarksopen=true,
+ bookmarksopenlevel=1,
+ colorlinks=true,
+ linkcolor=\HLinkColor]{hyperref}[2007/02/07]
+
+% Re-crop screen-formatted version, accommodating wide displays
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}
+ {}
+ {\hypersetup{pdfpagescrop= 0 30 560 765}}
+
+%%%% Fixed-width environment to format PG boilerplate %%%%
+\newenvironment{PGtext}{%
+\begin{alltt}
+\fontsize{9.2}{10.5}\ttfamily\selectfont}%
+{\end{alltt}}
+
+%%%% Misc global parameters
+\setlength{\emergencystretch}{1em}
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
+\MakePerPage{footnote}
+
+\hyphenation{collinea-tions einge-schrieben}
+
+\newlength{\TmpLen}
+
+% Table of contents
+\AtBeginDocument{\renewcommand{\contentsname}%
+ {\protect\centering\protect\large CONTENTS.}}
+
+\newcommand{\ToCPage}{%
+ \noindent\makebox[\textwidth][r]{{\scshape\scriptsize Lecture\hfill Page}}
+}
+\newcommand{\ToCBox}[1]{
+ \settowidth{\TmpLen}{VIII.}%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{#1}%
+}
+\newcommand{\ToCChap}[2]{%
+ \settowidth{\TmpLen}{999}%
+ \bigskip
+ \noindent\strut\parbox[b]{\textwidth-\TmpLen}{%
+ \ToCBox{#1}\hspace{0.5em}\hangindent4em #2\dotfill}%
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{\pageref{addendum}}%
+ }{%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{\pageref{lecture:#1}}
+ }
+}
+
+% Keep track of lecture number for equation cross-referencing
+\newcommand{\LectureNo}{}
+
+% Misc. semantic formatting
+\newcommand{\SetRunningHeads}[2]{%
+ \fancyhead{}
+ \setlength{\headheight}{15pt}
+ \thispagestyle{empty}
+ \fancyhead[CE]{\footnotesize\MakeTextUppercase{#1}}
+ \fancyhead[CO]{\footnotesize\MakeTextUppercase{#2}}
+
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}
+ {\fancyhead[RO,LE]{\thepage}}
+ {\fancyhead[R]{\thepage}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Heading}{\centering\normalfont\normalsize}
+
+\newcommand{\ChapterPrep}{%
+ \cleardoublepage
+ \phantomsection
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \vspace*{1in}%
+ }{}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Preface}{%
+ \ChapterPrep
+ \pdfbookmark[0]{Preface.}{Preface.}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{\protect\ToCPage}% Needs to go before all chapters
+
+ \pagestyle{fancy}
+ \fancyhf{}
+ \SetRunningHeads{Preface.}{Preface.}
+ \section*{\Heading\textsc{PREFACE.}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Addendum}[3]{%
+ \ChapterPrep
+ \label{addendum}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{\protect\ToCChap{}{The Development of Mathematics at the German Universities.}}
+ \pdfbookmark[0]{Addendum.}{Addendum.}
+
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \SetRunningHeads{The Development of Mathematics}{At the German Universities.}%
+ \section*{\Heading\MakeTextUppercase{#1} \MakeTextUppercase{#2}}
+ \subsection*{\Heading\normalsize\textsc{#3}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Lecture}[3][]{
+ \ChapterPrep
+ \label{lecture:#2}
+ \pdfbookmark[0]{Lecture #2}{Lecture #2}
+ \renewcommand{\LectureNo}{#2}
+
+ \addtocontents{toc}{\protect\ToCChap{#2}{#3}}
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{%
+ \SetRunningHeads{Lecture #2}{#3}%
+ }{%
+ \SetRunningHeads{Lecture #2}{#1}%
+ }
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#2}{I.}}{%
+ \begin{center}
+ \LARGE LECTURES ON MATHEMATICS.\\[12pt]
+ \rule{1in}{0.5pt}
+ \end{center}
+ }{}
+ \section*{\Heading\textsc{Lecture #2}: \MakeTextUppercase{#3}}
+}
+
+\newenvironment{participants}{\medskip\small}{\bigskip\normalsize}
+
+\newcommand{\Date}[1]{\subsection*{\Heading\normalsize #1}}
+\newcommand{\Name}[1]{\par\noindent\textsc{#1}\hangindent\parindent}
+\newcommand{\First}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\DPtypo}[2]{#2}
+\newcommand{\DPnote}[1]{}
+
+\newcommand{\linestretch}[1]{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\dd}{\partial}
+
+% Needs to behave "nestedly" inside \emph
+\newcommand{\ie}{\emph{i.e.}}
+
+\renewcommand{\pmod}[2][]{%
+ \ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{%
+ (\text{mod.}~#2)%
+ }{
+ \bigl[\text{mod.}~(#2)\bigr]%
+ }
+}
+
+\DeclareMathOperator{\am}{am}
+
+\DeclareInputText{176}{\ifmmode{{}^\circ}\else\textdegree\fi}
+\DeclareInputText{183}{\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi}
+
+\newcommand{\Input}[2][]
+ {\ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}
+ {\includegraphics{./images/illo#2.png}}
+ {\includegraphics[width=#1]{./images/illo#2.png}}%
+}
+
+\newcounter{figno}
+\newcommand{\Figure}[2][0.9\textwidth]{%
+\begin{figure}[hbt!]
+ \refstepcounter{figno}
+ \centering
+ \Input[#1]{#2}
+ \caption{Fig.~\thefigno}
+ \label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{figure}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Figures}[4]{%
+\begin{figure}[hbt!]
+\centering
+\refstepcounter{figno}
+\begin{minipage}{0.4\textwidth}
+\hfil\Input[#1]{#2}
+\caption{Fig.\thefigno.}
+\label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{minipage}\hfil
+\refstepcounter{figno}
+\begin{minipage}{0.4\textwidth}
+\Input[#3]{#4}
+\caption{Fig.~\thefigno.}
+\label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{figure}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\WFigure}[2]{%
+\begin{wrapfigure}{o}{#1}
+ \refstepcounter{figno}
+ \centering
+ \Input[#1]{#2}
+ \caption{Fig.~\thefigno}
+ \label{fig:\thefigno}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Fig}[1]{\hyperref[fig:#1]{Fig.~#1}}
+
+% Equation anchors and links
+\newcommand{\Tag}[1]{%
+ \phantomsection
+ \label{eqn:\LectureNo#1}
+ \tag*{\normalsize\ensuremath{#1}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Eq}[1]{\hyperref[eqn:\LectureNo#1]{\ensuremath{#1}}}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% START OF DOCUMENT %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\pagestyle{empty}
+\pagenumbering{Alph}
+
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Front Matter}{Front Matter}
+
+%%%% PG BOILERPLATE %%%%
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG Boilerplate}{Project Gutenberg Boilerplate}
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\small
+\begin{PGtext}
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on
+Mathematics, by Felix Klein
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on Mathematics
+ Delivered From Aug. 28 to Sept. 9, 1893 Before Members of
+ the Congress of Mathematics Held in Connection with the
+ World's Fair in Chicago
+
+Author: Felix Klein
+
+Release Date: May 18, 2011 [EBook #36154]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM ***
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+
+\clearpage
+
+
+%%%% Credits and transcriber's note %%%%
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\begin{PGtext}
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Brenda Lewis, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images from the Cornell University
+Library: Historical Mathematics Monographs collection.)
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+
+\begin{minipage}{0.85\textwidth}
+\small
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Transcriber's Note}{Transcriber's Note}
+\subsection*{\centering\normalfont\scshape%
+\normalsize\MakeLowercase{\TransNote}}%
+
+\raggedright
+\TransNoteText
+\end{minipage}
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FRONT MATTER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\frontmatter
+\pagenumbering{roman}
+%% -----File: 001.png---Folio i-------
+\null\vfill
+\begin{center}
+\Large LECTURES ON MATHEMATICS
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 002.png---Folio ii-------
+\null\vfill
+\begin{center}
+%[MacMillan Publisher's device]
+\Input[1.5in]{002}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 003.png---Folio iii-------
+\begin{center}
+\linestretch{1.2}%
+\setlength{\TmpLen}{16pt}
+\underline{\large{\textit{THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM}}}
+\vfill
+
+\huge{\textsc{Lectures on Mathematics}}
+\vfill
+
+\footnotesize\scshape
+delivered \\
+From Aug.~28 to Sept.~9, 1893 \\[\TmpLen]
+\itshape BEFORE MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESS OF MATHEMATICS \\
+HELD IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORLD'S \\
+FAIR IN CHICAGO \\[\TmpLen]
+\upshape AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY \\
+\scriptsize EVANSTON, ILL.
+\vfill
+
+BY \\
+\large FELIX KLEIN
+\vfill
+
+\footnotesize \textit{REPORTED BY ALEXANDER ZIWET}
+\vfill
+
+PUBLISHED FOR H.~S. WHITE AND A.~ZIWET \\[\TmpLen]
+\textgoth{New York} \\
+\normalsize MACMILLAN AND CO. \\
+\footnotesize AND LONDON \\
+\small 1894 \\[\TmpLen]
+\scriptsize \textit{All rights reserved}
+\end{center}
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 004.png---Folio iv-------
+\null\vfill
+\begin{center}
+\scriptsize\scshape Copyright, 1893, \\
+By MACMILLAN AND CO.
+\vfill
+
+{\footnotesize\textgoth{Norwood Press:}} \\
+\upshape J.~S. Cushing~\&~Co.---Berwick~\&~Smith. \\
+Boston, Mass., U.S.A.
+\end{center}
+\newpage
+%% -----File: 005.png---Folio v-------
+
+\Preface
+
+\First{The} Congress of Mathematics held under the auspices of
+the World's Fair Auxiliary in Chicago, from the 21st to the
+26th of August, 1893, was attended by Professor Felix Klein
+of the University of Göttingen, as one of the commissioners of
+the German university exhibit at the Columbian Exposition.
+After the adjournment of the Congress, Professor Klein kindly
+consented to hold a \textit{colloquium} on mathematics with such members
+of the Congress as might wish to participate. The Northwestern
+University at Evanston,~Ill., tendered the use of rooms
+for this purpose and placed a collection of mathematical books
+from its library at the disposal of the members of the colloquium.
+The following is a list of the members attending the
+colloquium:---
+\begin{participants}
+\Name{W.~W. Beman, A.M.}, professor of mathematics, University of Michigan.
+
+\Name{E.~M. Blake, Ph.D.}, instructor in mathematics, Columbia College.
+
+\Name{O.~Bolza, Ph.D.}, associate professor of mathematics, University of Chicago.
+
+\Name{H.~T. Eddy, Ph.D.}, president of the Rose Polytechnic Institute.
+
+\Name{A.~M. Ely, A.B.}, professor of mathematics, Vassar College.
+
+\Name{F.~Franklin, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, Johns Hopkins University.
+
+\Name{T.~F. Holgate, Ph.D.}, instructor in mathematics, Northwestern University.
+
+\Name{L.~S. Hulburt, A.M.}, instructor in mathematics, Johns Hopkins University.
+
+\Name{F.~H. Loud, A.B.}, professor of mathematics and astronomy, Colorado College.
+
+\Name{J.~McMahon, A.M.}, assistant professor of mathematics, Cornell University.
+
+\Name{H.~Maschke, Ph.D.}, assistant professor of mathematics, University of
+Chicago.
+
+\Name{E.~H. Moore, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, University of Chicago.
+%% -----File: 006.png---Folio vi-------
+
+\Name{J.~E. Oliver, A.M.}, professor of mathematics, Cornell University.
+
+\Name{A.~M. Sawin, Sc.M.}, Evanston.
+
+\Name{W.~E. Story, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, Clark University.
+
+\Name{E.~Study, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, University of Marburg.
+
+\Name{H.~Taber, Ph.D.}, assistant professor of mathematics, Clark University.
+
+\Name{H.~W. Tyler, Ph.D.}, professor of mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of
+Technology.
+
+\Name{J.~M. Van~Vleck, A.M., LL.D.}, professor of mathematics and astronomy,
+Wesleyan University.
+
+\Name{E.~B. Van~Vleck, Ph.D.}, instructor in mathematics, University of Wisconsin.
+
+\Name{C.~A. Waldo, A.M.}, professor of mathematics, De~Pauw University.
+
+\Name{H.~S. White, Ph.D.}, associate professor of mathematics, Northwestern University.
+
+\Name{M.~F. Winston, A.B.}, honorary fellow in mathematics, University of Chicago.
+
+\Name{A.~Ziwet}, assistant professor of mathematics, University of Michigan.
+\end{participants}
+
+The meetings lasted from August~28th till September~9th;
+and in the course of these two weeks Professor Klein gave a
+daily lecture, besides devoting a large portion of his time to
+personal intercourse and conferences with those attending the
+meetings. The lectures were delivered freely, in the English
+language, substantially in the form in which they are here
+given to the public. The only change made consists in obliterating
+the conversational form of the frequent questions and
+discussions by means of which Professor Klein understands so
+well to enliven his discourse. My notes, after being written
+out each day, were carefully revised by Professor Klein himself,
+both in manuscript and in the proofs.
+
+As an appendix it has been thought proper to give a translation
+of the interesting historical sketch contributed by Professor
+Klein to the work \textit{Die deutschen Universitäten}. The translation
+was prepared by Professor H.~W.~Tyler, of the Massachusetts
+Institute of Technology.
+
+It is to be hoped that the proceedings of the Chicago Congress
+of Mathematics, in which Professor Klein took a leading
+%% -----File: 007.png---Folio vii-------
+part, will soon be published in full. The papers presented to
+this Congress, and the discussions that followed their reading,
+form an important complement to the Evanston colloquium.
+Indeed, in reading the lectures here published, it should be kept
+in mind that they followed immediately upon the adjournment
+of the Chicago meeting, and were addressed to members of the
+Congress. This circumstance, in addition to the limited time
+and the informal character of the colloquium, must account
+for the incompleteness with which the various subjects are
+treated.
+
+In concluding, the editor wishes to express his thanks to
+Professors W.~W.~Beman and H.~S.~White for aid in preparing
+the manuscript and correcting the proofs.
+
+\hfill ALEXANDER ZIWET.\hspace{\parindent}
+
+{\footnotesize\textsc{Ann Arbor, Mich.,} November, 1893.}
+%% -----File: 008.png---Folio viii-------
+%[Blank Page]
+%% -----File: 009.png---Folio ix-------
+\tableofcontents
+\iffalse
+CONTENTS.
+
+Lecture Page
+
+I. Clebsch 1
+
+II. Sophus Lie 9
+
+III. Sophus Lie 18
+
+IV. On the Real Shape of Algebraic Curves and Surfaces 25
+
+V. Theory of Functions and Geometry 33
+
+VI. On the Mathematical Character of Space-Intuition, and the
+Relation of Pure Mathematics to the Applied Sciences 41
+
+VII. The Transcendency of the Numbers $e$ and $\pi$ 51
+
+VIII. Ideal Numbers 58
+
+IX. The Solution of Higher Algebraic Equations 67
+
+X. On Some Recent Advances in Hyperelliptic and Abelian Functions 75
+
+XI. The Most Recent Researches in Non-Euclidean Geometry 85
+
+XII. The Study of Mathematics at Göttingen 94
+
+The Development of Mathematics at the German Universities 99
+\fi
+%% -----File: 010.png---Folio x-------
+%[Blank Page]
+%% -----File: 011.png---Folio 1-------
+\mainmatter
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Main Matter.}{Main Matter.}
+
+%[** TN: Text printed by the \Lecture command]
+% LECTURES ON MATHEMATICS.
+\Lecture{I.}{Clebsch.}
+
+\Date{(August 28, 1893.)}
+
+\First{It} will be the object of our \textit{Colloquia} to pass in review some
+of the principal phases of the most recent development of mathematical
+thought in Germany.
+
+A brief sketch of the growth of mathematics in the German
+universities in the course of the present century has been contributed
+by me to the work \textit{Die deutschen Universitäten}, compiled
+and edited by Professor \emph{Lexis} (Berlin, Asher, 1893), for
+the exhibit of the German universities at the World's Fair.\footnote
+ {A translation of this sketch will be found in the Appendix, \hyperref[addendum]{p.~\pageref{addendum}}.}
+The strictly objective point of view that had to be adopted for
+this sketch made it necessary to break off the account about
+the year~1870. In the present more informal lectures these
+restrictions both as to time and point of view are abandoned.
+It is just the period since 1870 that I intend to deal with, and
+I shall speak of it in a more subjective manner, insisting particularly
+on those features of the development of mathematics
+in which I have taken part myself either by personal work or
+by direct observation.
+
+The first week will be devoted largely to \emph{Geometry}, taking
+this term in its broadest sense; and in this first lecture it will
+surely be appropriate to select the celebrated geometer \emph{Clebsch}
+%% -----File: 012.png---Folio 2-------
+as the central figure, partly because he was one of my principal
+teachers, and also for the reason that his work is so well known
+in this country.
+
+Among mathematicians in general, three main categories may
+be distinguished; and perhaps the names \emph{logicians}, \emph{formalists},
+and \emph{intuitionists} may serve to characterize them. (1)~The word
+\emph{logician} is here used, of course, without reference to the mathematical
+logic of Boole, Peirce,~etc.; it is only intended to indicate
+that the main strength of the men belonging to this class
+lies in their logical and critical power, in their ability to give
+strict definitions, and to derive rigid deductions therefrom.
+The great and wholesome influence exerted in Germany by
+\emph{Weierstrass} in this direction is well known. (2)~The \emph{formalists}
+among the mathematicians excel mainly in the skilful formal
+treatment of a given question, in devising for it an ``algorithm.''
+\emph{Gordan}, or let us say \emph{Cayley} and \emph{Sylvester}, must be ranged in
+this group. (3)~To the \emph{intuitionists}, finally, belong those who
+lay particular stress on geometrical intuition (\textit{Anschauung}), not
+in pure geometry only, but in all branches of mathematics.
+What Benjamin Peirce has called ``geometrizing a mathematical
+question'' seems to express the same idea. Lord \emph{Kelvin} and
+\emph{von~Staudt} may be mentioned as types of this category.
+
+\emph{Clebsch} must be said to belong both to the second and third
+of these categories, while I should class myself with the third,
+and also the first. For this reason my account of Clebsch's
+work will be incomplete; but this will hardly prove a serious
+drawback, considering that the part of his work characterized
+by the second of the above categories is already so fully appreciated
+here in America. In general, it is my intention here,
+not so much to give a complete account of any subject, as to
+\emph{supplement} the mathematical views that I find prevalent in this
+country.
+%% -----File: 013.png---Folio 3-------
+
+As the first achievement of Clebsch we must set down the
+introduction into Germany of the work done previously by
+Cayley and Sylvester in England. But he not only transplanted
+to German soil their theory of invariants and the interpretation
+of projective geometry by means of this theory; he
+also brought this theory into live and fruitful correlation with
+the fundamental ideas of Riemann's theory of functions. In
+the former respect, it may be sufficient to refer to Clebsch's
+\textit{Vorlesungen über Geometrie}, edited and continued by Lindemann;
+to his \textit{Binäre algebraische Formen}, and in general to
+what he did in co-operation with Gordan. A good historical
+account of his work will be found in the biography of Clebsch
+published in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~7.
+
+Riemann's celebrated memoir of 1857\footnote
+ {\textit{Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik,
+ Vol.~54 (1857), pp.~115--155; reprinted in Riemann's \textit{Werke}, 1876, pp.~81--135.}
+presented the new
+ideas on the theory of functions in a somewhat startling novel
+form that prevented their immediate acceptance and recognition.
+He based the theory of the Abelian integrals and their
+inverse,\DPnote{** [sic], adjective?} the Abelian functions, on the idea of the surface now
+so well known by his name, and on the corresponding fundamental
+theorems of existence (\textit{Existenztheoreme}). Clebsch, by
+taking as his starting-point an algebraic curve defined by its
+equation, made the theory more accessible to the mathematicians
+of his time, and added a more concrete interest to it
+by the geometrical theorems that he deduced from the theory
+of Abelian functions. Clebsch's paper, \textit{Ueber die Anwendung
+der Abel'schen Functionen in der Geometrie},\footnote
+ {Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik, Vol.~63 (1864), pp.~189--243.}
+and the work of
+Clebsch and Gordan on Abelian functions,\footnote
+ {\textit{Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1866.}
+are well known to
+American mathematicians; and in accordance with my plan, I
+proceed to give merely some critical remarks.
+%% -----File: 014.png---Folio 4-------
+
+However great the achievement of Clebsch's in making
+the work of Riemann more easy of access to his contemporaries,
+it is my opinion that at the present time the book of
+Clebsch is no longer to be considered as the standard work
+for an introduction to the study of Abelian functions. The
+chief objections to Clebsch's presentation are twofold: they
+can be briefly characterized as a lack of mathematical rigour
+on the one hand, and a loss of intuitiveness, of geometrical
+perspicuity, on the other. A few examples will explain my
+meaning.
+
+(\textit{a})~Clebsch bases his whole investigation on the consideration
+of what he takes to be the most general type of an
+algebraic curve, and this \emph{general} curve he assumes as having
+only double points, but no other singularities. To obtain a
+sure foundation for the theory, it must be proved that any
+algebraic curve can be transformed rationally into a curve
+having only double points. This proof was not given by
+Clebsch; it has since been supplied by his pupils and followers,
+but the demonstration is long and involved. See the
+papers by Brill and Nöther in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~7
+(1874),\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die algebraischen Functionen und ihre Anwendung in der Geometrie},
+ pp.~269--310.}
+and by Nöther, \textit{ib}., Vol.~23 (1884).\footnote
+ {\textit{Rationale Ausführung der Operationen in der Theorie der algebraischen Functionen},
+ pp.~311--358.}
+
+Another defect of the same kind occurs in connection with
+the determinant of the periods of the Abelian integrals. This
+determinant never vanishes as long as the curve is irreducible.
+But Clebsch and Gordan neglect to prove this, and
+however simple the proof may be, this must be regarded as
+an inexactness.
+
+The apparent lack of critical spirit which we find in the work
+of Clebsch is characteristic of the geometrical epoch in which
+%% -----File: 015.png---Folio 5-------
+he lived, the epoch of Steiner, among others. It detracts in no-wise
+from the merit of his work. But the influence of the
+theory of functions has taught the present generation to be
+more exacting.
+
+(\textit{b})~The second objection to adopting Clebsch's presentation
+lies in the fact that, from Riemann's point of view, many points
+of the theory become far more simple and almost self-evident,
+whereas in Clebsch's theory they are not brought out in all
+their beauty. An example of this is presented by the idea of
+the deficiency~$p$. In Riemann's theory, where $p$~represents the
+order of connectivity of the surface, the invariability of~$p$ under
+any rational transformation is self-evident, while from the point
+of view of Clebsch this invariability must be proved by means
+of a long elimination, without affording the true geometrical
+insight into its meaning.
+
+For these reasons it seems to me best to begin the theory
+of Abelian functions with Riemann's ideas, without, however,
+neglecting to give later the purely algebraical developments.
+This method is adopted in my paper on Abelian functions;\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~36 (1890), pp.~1--83.}
+it is also followed in the work \textit{Die elliptischen Modulfunctionen},
+Vols.\ I.~and~II., edited by Dr.~Fricke. A general account of the
+historical development of the theory of algebraic curves in connection
+with Riemann's ideas will be found in my (lithographed)
+lectures on \textit{Riemann'sche Flächen}, delivered in 1891--92.\footnote
+ {My lithographed lectures frequently give only an outline of the subject, omitting
+ details and long demonstrations, which are supposed to be supplied by the
+ student by private reading and a study of the literature of the subject.}
+
+If this arrangement be adopted, it is interesting to follow
+out the true relation that the algebraical developments bear
+to Riemann's theory. Thus in Brill and Nöther's theory, the
+so-called \emph{fundamental theorem} of Nöther is of primary importance.
+%% -----File: 016.png---Folio 6-------
+It gives a rule for deciding under what conditions an
+algebraic rational integral function~$f$ of~$x$ and~$y$ can be put into
+the form
+\[
+f = A \phi + B \psi,
+\]
+where~$\phi$ and~$\psi$ are likewise rational algebraic functions. Each
+point of intersection of the curves $\phi = 0$ and $\psi = 0$ must of
+course be a point of the curve $f = 0$. But there remains the
+question of multiple and singular points; and this is disposed
+of by Nöther's theorem. Now it is of great interest to investigate
+how these relations present themselves when the
+starting-point is taken from Riemann's ideas.
+
+One of the best illustrations of the utility of adopting
+Riemann's principles is presented by the very remarkable
+advance made recently by Hurwitz, in the theory of algebraic
+curves, in particular his extension of the theory of algebraic
+correspondences, an account of which is given in the second
+volume of the \textit{Elliptische Modulfunctionen}. Cayley had found
+as a fundamental theorem in this theory a rule for determining
+the number of self-corresponding points for algebraic correspondences
+of a simple kind. A whole series of very valuable
+papers by Brill, published in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen},\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber zwei Berührungsprobleme}, Vol.~4 (1871), pp.~527--549.---\textit{Ueber Entsprechen
+ von Punktsystemen auf einer Curve}, Vol.~6 (1873), pp.~33--65.---\textit{Ueber die
+ Correspondenzformel}, Vol.~7 (1874), pp.~607--622.---\textit{Ueber algebraische Correspondenzen},
+ Vol.~31 (1888), pp.~374--409.---\textit{Ueber algebraische Correspondenzen. Zweite
+ Abhandlung: Specialgruppen von Punkten einer algebraischen Curve}, Vol.~36 (1890),
+ pp.~321--360.}
+is devoted
+to the further investigation and demonstration of this theorem.
+Now Hurwitz, attacking the problem from the point of view
+of Riemann's ideas, arrives not only at a more simple and
+quite general demonstration of Cayley's rule, but proceeds to a
+complete study of all possible algebraic correspondences. He
+finds that while for \emph{general} curves the correspondences considered
+%% -----File: 017.png---Folio 7-------
+by Cayley and Brill are the only ones that exist, in the
+case of \emph{singular} curves there are other correspondences which
+also can be treated completely. These singular curves are
+characterized by certain linear relations with integral coefficients,
+connecting the periods of their Abelian integrals.
+
+Let us now turn to that side of Clebsch's method which
+appears to me to be the most important, and which certainly
+must be recognized as being of great and permanent value;
+I mean the generalization, obtained by Clebsch, of the whole
+theory of Abelian integrals to the theory of algebraic functions
+with several variables. By applying the methods he had
+developed for functions of the form $f(x, y) = 0$, or in homogeneous
+co-ordinates, $f(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) = 0$, to functions with four
+homogeneous variables $f(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}) = 0$, he found in~1868,
+that there also exists a number~$p$ that remains invariant under
+all rational transformations of the surface $f = 0$. Clebsch
+arrives at this result by considering \emph{double integrals} belonging
+to the surface.
+
+It is evident that this theory could not have been found from
+Riemann's point of view. There is no difficulty in conceiving a
+four-dimensional Riemann space corresponding to an equation
+$f(x, y, z) = 0$. But the difficulty would lie in proving the
+``theorems of existence'' for such a space; and it may even be
+doubted whether analogous theorems hold in such a space.
+
+While to Clebsch is due the fundamental idea of this
+grand generalization, the working out of this theory was
+left to his pupils and followers. The work was mainly carried
+on by Nöther, who showed, in the case of algebraic surfaces,
+the existence of more than one invariant number~$p$ and of
+corresponding moduli, \ie\ constants not changed by one-to-one
+transformations. Italian and French mathematicians, in particular
+Picard and Poincaré, have also contributed largely to the
+further development of the theory.
+%% -----File: 018.png---Folio 8-------
+
+If the value of a man of science is to be gauged not by his
+general activity in all directions, but solely by the fruitful new
+ideas that he has first introduced into his science, then the
+theory just considered must be regarded as the most valuable
+work of Clebsch.
+
+In close connection with the preceding are the general ideas
+put forth by Clebsch in his last memoir,\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber ein neues Grundgebilde der analytischen Geometrie der Ebene}, Math.\
+ Annalen, Vol.~6 (1873), pp.~203--215.}
+ideas to which he
+himself attached great importance. This memoir implies an
+application, as it were, of the theory of Abelian functions to
+the theory of differential equations. It is well known that the
+central problem of the whole of modern mathematics is the
+study of the transcendental functions defined by differential
+equations. Now Clebsch, led by the analogy of his theory of
+Abelian integrals, proceeds somewhat as follows. Let us consider,
+for example, an ordinary differential equation of the first
+order $f(x, y, y') = 0$, where $f$~represents an algebraic function.
+Regarding~$y'$ as a third variable~$z$, we have the equation of an
+algebraic surface. Just as the Abelian integrals can be classified
+according to the properties of the fundamental curve that
+remain unchanged under a rational transformation, so Clebsch
+proposes to classify the transcendental functions defined by
+the differential equations according to the invariant properties
+of the corresponding surfaces $f = 0$ under rational one-to-one
+transformations.
+
+The theory of differential equations is just now being cultivated
+very extensively by French mathematicians; and some
+of them proceed precisely from this point of view first adopted
+by Clebsch.
+%% -----File: 019.png---Folio 9-------
+
+\Lecture{II.}{Sophus Lie.}
+
+\Date{(August 29, 1893.)}
+
+\First{To} fully understand the mathematical genius of Sophus Lie,
+one must not turn to the books recently published by him in
+collaboration with Dr.~Engel, but to his earlier memoirs, written
+during the first years of his scientific career. There Lie shows
+himself the true geometer that he is, while in his later publications,
+finding that he was but imperfectly understood by the
+mathematicians accustomed to the analytical point of view, he
+adopted a very general analytical form of treatment that is not
+always easy to follow.
+
+Fortunately, I had the advantage of becoming intimately
+acquainted with Lie's ideas at a very early period, when they
+were still, as the chemists say, in the ``nascent state,'' and
+thus most effective in producing a strong reaction. My lecture
+to-day will therefore be devoted chiefly to his paper ``\textit{Ueber
+Complexe, insbesondere Linien- und Kugel-Complexe, mit Anwendung
+auf die Theorie partieller Differentialgleichungen}.''\footnote
+ {Math.\ Annalen,\DPnote{** TN: Italicized in original} Vol.~5 (1872), pp.~145--256.}
+
+To define the place of this paper in the historical development
+of geometry, a word must be said of two eminent geometers
+of an earlier period: Plücker (1801--68) and Monge (1746--1818).
+Plücker's name is familiar to every mathematician,
+through his formulæ relating to algebraic curves. But what is
+of importance in the present connection is his generalized idea
+%% -----File: 020.png---Folio 10-------
+of the space-element. The ordinary geometry with the point as
+element deals with space as three-dimensioned, conformably to
+the three constants determining the position of a point. A dual
+transformation gives the plane as element; space in this case
+has also three dimensions, as there are three independent constants
+in the equation of the plane. If, however, the straight
+line be selected as space-element, space must be considered as
+four-dimensional, since four independent constants determine
+a straight line. Again, if a quadric surface~$F_{2}$ be taken as
+element, space will have nine dimensions, because every such
+element requires nine quantities for its determination, viz.\ the
+nine independent constants of the surface~$F_{2}$; in other words,
+space contains $\infty^{9}$~quadric surfaces. This conception of hyperspaces
+must be clearly distinguished from that of Grassmann
+and others. Plücker, indeed, rejected any other idea of a space
+of more than three dimensions as too abstruse.---The work
+of Monge that is here of importance, is his \textit{Application de
+l'analyse à la géométrie}, 1809 (reprinted 1850), in which he
+treats of ordinary and partial differential equations of the first
+and second order, and applies these to geometrical questions
+such as the curvature of surfaces, their lines of curvature,
+geodesic lines,~etc. The treatment of geometrical problems by
+means of the differential and integral calculus is one feature of
+this work; the other, perhaps even more important, is the converse
+of this, viz.\ the application of geometrical intuition to
+questions of analysis.
+
+Now this last feature is one of the most prominent characteristics
+of Lie's work; he increases its power by adopting Plücker's
+idea of a generalized space-element and extending this fundamental
+conception. A few examples will best serve to give an
+idea of the character of his work; as such an example I select
+(as I have done elsewhere before) Lie's sphere-geometry (\textit{Kugelgeometrie}).
+%% -----File: 021.png---Folio 11-------
+
+Taking the equation of a sphere in the form
+\[
+x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} - 2Bx - 2Cy - 2Dz + E = 0,
+\]
+the coefficients, $B$, $C$, $D$, $E$, can be regarded as the co-ordinates
+of the sphere, and ordinary space appears accordingly as a
+manifoldness of four dimensions. For the radius,~$R$, of the
+sphere we have
+\[
+R^{2} = B^{2} + C^{2} + D^{2} - E
+\]
+as a relation connecting the fifth quantity,~$R$, with the four co-ordinates,
+$B$, $C$, $D$,~$E$.
+
+To introduce homogeneous co-ordinates, put
+\[
+B = \frac{b}{a}, \quad C = \frac{c}{a},\quad D =\frac{d}{a},\quad E = \frac{e}{a}, \quad R = \frac{r}{a};
+\]
+then $a : b : c : d : e$ are the five homogeneous co-ordinates of the
+sphere, and the sixth quantity~$r$ is related to them by means of
+the homogeneous equation of the second degree,
+\[
+r^{2} = b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - ae.
+\Tag{(1)}
+\]
+
+Sphere-geometry has been treated in two ways that must be
+carefully distinguished. In one method, which we may call \emph{the
+elementary sphere-geometry}, only the five co-ordinates $a : b : c : d : e$
+are used, while in the other, \emph{the higher}, or \emph{Lie's}, \emph{sphere-geometry},
+the quantity~$r$ is introduced. In this latter system, a sphere
+has six homogeneous co-ordinates, $a$,~$b$,~$c$, $d$,~$e$,~$r$, connected by
+the equation~\Eq{(1)}.
+
+From a higher point of view the distinction between these
+two sphere-geometries, as well as their individual character, is
+best brought out by considering the \emph{group} belonging to each.
+Indeed, every system of geometry is characterized by its group,
+in the meaning explained in my Erlangen \textit{Programm};\DPnote{** Semicolon ital. in orig.}\footnote
+ {\textit{Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen.\ Programm
+ zum Eintritt in die philosophische Facultät und den Senat der K.~Friedrich-Alexanders-Universität
+ zu Erlangen}. Erlangen, Deichert, 1872. For an English translation,
+ by Haskell, see the Bulletin of the New York Mathematical Society, Vol.~2
+ (1893), pp.~215--249.}
+\ie\
+%% -----File: 022.png---Folio 12-------
+every system of geometry deals only with such relations of
+space as remain unchanged by the transformations of its group.
+
+In the elementary sphere-geometry the group is formed by
+all the linear substitutions of the five quantities $a$,~$b$,~$c$, $d$,~$e$,
+that leave unchanged the homogeneous equation of the second
+degree
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - ae = 0.
+\Tag{(2)}
+\]
+This gives $\infty^{25-15} = \infty^{10}$ substitutions. By adopting this definition
+we obtain point-transformations of a simple character.
+The geometrical meaning of equation~\Eq{(2)} is that the radius is
+zero. Every sphere of vanishing radius, \ie\ every point, is
+therefore transformed into a point. Moreover, as the polar
+\[
+2bb' + 2cc' + 2dd' - ae' - a'e = 0
+\]
+remains likewise unchanged in the transformation, it follows
+that orthogonal spheres are transformed into orthogonal spheres.
+Thus the group of the elementary sphere-geometry is characterized
+as the \emph{conformal group}, well known as that of the transformation
+by inversion (or reciprocal radii) and through its
+applications in mathematical physics.
+
+Darboux has further developed this elementary sphere-geometry.
+Any equation of the second degree
+\[
+F(a, b, c, d, e) = 0,
+\]
+taken in connection with the relation~\Eq{(2)} represents a point-surface
+which Darboux has called \emph{cyclide}. From the point of
+view of ordinary projective geometry, the cyclide is a surface of
+the fourth order containing the imaginary circle common to all
+spheres of space as a double curve. A careful investigation
+%% -----File: 023.png---Folio 13-------
+of these cyclides will be found in Darboux's \textit{Leçons sur la
+théorie générale des surfaces et les applications géométriques du
+calcul infinitésimal}, and elsewhere. As the ordinary surfaces of
+the second degree can be regarded as special cases of cyclides,
+we have here a method for generalizing the known properties
+of quadric surfaces by extending them to cyclides. Thus Mr.\
+M.~Bôcher, of Harvard University, in his dissertation,\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Reihenentwickelungen der Potentialtheorie}, gekrönte Preisschrift,
+ Göttingen, Dieterich,~1891.}
+has
+treated the extension of a problem in the theory of the potential
+from the known case of a body bounded by surfaces of
+the second degree to a body bounded by cyclides. A more
+extended publication on this subject by Mr.~Bôcher will appear
+in a few months (Leipzig, Teubner).
+
+In the higher sphere-geometry of Lie, the six homogeneous
+co-ordinates $a : b : c : d : e : r$ are connected, as mentioned above,
+by the homogeneous equation of the second degree,
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - r^{2} - ae = 0.
+\]
+
+The corresponding group is selected as the group of the
+linear substitutions transforming this equation into itself. We
+have thus a group of $\infty^{36-21} = \infty^{15}$ substitutions. But this is
+not a group of point-transformations; for a sphere of radius
+zero becomes a sphere whose radius is in general different from
+zero. Thus, putting for instance
+\[
+B' = B,\quad C' = C,\quad D' = D,\quad E' = E,\quad R' = R + \text{const.},
+\]
+it appears that the transformation consists in a mere dilatation
+or expansion of each sphere, a point becoming a sphere of
+given radius.
+
+The meaning of the polar equation
+\[
+2bb' + 2cc' + 2dd' - 2rr' - ae' - a'e = 0
+\]
+%% -----File: 024.png---Folio 14-------
+remaining invariant for any transformation of the group, is evidently
+that the spheres originally in contact remain in contact.
+The group belongs therefore to the important class of \emph{contact-transformations},
+which will soon be considered more in detail.
+
+In studying any particular geometry, such as Lie's sphere-geometry,
+two methods present themselves.
+
+(1)~We may consider equations of various degrees and inquire
+what they represent. In devising names for the different configurations
+so obtained, Lie used the names introduced by
+Plücker in his line-geometry. Thus a single equation,
+\[
+F(a, b, c, d, e, r) = 0,
+\]
+is said to represent a \emph{complex} of the first, second,~etc., degree,
+according to the degree of the equation; a complex contains,
+therefore, $\infty^{3}$~spheres. Two such equations,
+\[
+F_{1} = 0,\quad F_{2} = 0,
+\]
+represent a \emph{congruency} containing $\infty^{2}$~spheres. Three equations,
+\[
+F_{1} = 0,\quad F_{2} = 0,\quad F_{3} = 0,
+\]
+may be said to represent a \emph{set} of spheres, the number being~$\infty^{1}$.
+It is to be noticed that in each case the equation of the second
+degree,
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - r^{2} - ae = 0,
+\]
+is understood to be combined with the equation $F = 0$.
+
+It may be well to mention expressly that the same names are
+used by other authors in the elementary sphere-geometry, where
+their meaning is, of course, different.
+
+(2)~The other method of studying a new geometry consists
+in inquiring how the ordinary configurations of point-geometry
+can be treated by means of the new system. This line of
+inquiry has led Lie to highly interesting results.
+%% -----File: 025.png---Folio 15-------
+
+In ordinary geometry a surface is conceived as a locus of
+points; in Lie's geometry it appears as the totality of all the
+spheres having contact with the surface. This gives a threefold
+infinity of spheres, or a complex of spheres,
+\[
+F(a, b, c, d, e, r) = 0.
+\]
+But this, of course, is not a \emph{general} complex; for not every complex
+will be such as to touch a surface. It has been shown
+that the condition that must be fulfilled by a complex of
+spheres, if all its spheres are to touch a surface, is the following:
+\[
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd b}\right)^{2} +
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd c}\right)^{2} +
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd d}\right)^{2} -
+\left(\frac{\dd F}{\dd r}\right)^{2} - \frac{\dd F}{\dd a}\, \frac{\dd F}{\dd e} = 0.
+\]
+
+To give at least one illustration of the further development of
+this interesting theory, I will mention that among the infinite
+number of spheres touching the surface at any point there are
+two having stationary contact with the surface; they are called
+the \emph{principal spheres}. The lines of curvature of the surface
+can then be defined as curves along which the principal spheres
+touch the surface in two successive points.
+
+Plücker's line-geometry can be studied by the same two
+methods just mentioned. In this geometry let $p_{12}$, $p_{13}$, $p_{14}$, $p_{34}$,
+$p_{42}$, $p_{23}$ be the usual six homogeneous co-ordinates, where
+$p_{ik} = -p_{ki}$. Then we have the identity
+\[
+p_{12}p_{34} + p_{13}p_{42} + p_{14}p_{23} = 0,
+\]
+and we take as group the $\infty^{15}$ linear substitutions transforming
+this equation into itself. This group corresponds to the totality
+of collineations and reciprocations, \ie\ to the projective group.
+The reason for this lies in the fact that the polar equation
+\[
+p_{12}{p_{34}}' + p_{13}{p_{42}}' + p_{14}{p_{23}}' +
+p_{34}{p_{12}}' + p_{42}{p_{13}}' + p_{23}{p_{14}}' = 0
+\]
+expresses the intersection of the two lines~$p$,~$p'$.
+%% -----File: 026.png---Folio 16-------
+
+Now Lie has instituted a comparison of the highest interest
+between the line-geometry of Plücker and his own sphere-geometry.
+In each of these geometries there occur six homogeneous
+co-ordinates connected by a homogeneous equation of
+the second degree. The discriminant of each equation is different
+from zero. It follows that we can pass from either of these
+geometries to the other by linear substitutions. Thus, to transform
+\[
+p_{12}p_{34} + p_{13}p_{42} + p_{14}p_{23} = 0
+\]
+into
+\[
+b^{2} + c^{2} + d^{2} - r^{2} - ae = 0,
+\]
+it is sufficient to assume, say,
+\begin{alignat*}{3}
+p_{12} &= b + ic,\quad & p_{13} &= d + r,\quad & p_{14} &= -a, \\
+p_{34} &= b - ic,\quad & p_{42} &= d - r,\quad & p_{23} &= e.
+\end{alignat*}
+It follows from the linear character of the substitutions that
+the polar equations are likewise transformed into each other.
+Thus we have the remarkable result that \emph{two spheres that touch
+correspond to two lines that intersect}.
+
+It is worthy of notice that the equations of transformation
+involve the imaginary unit~$i$; and the law of inertia of quadratic
+forms shows at once that this introduction of the imaginary
+cannot be avoided, but is essential.
+
+To illustrate the value of this transformation of line-geometry
+into sphere-geometry, and \textit{vice versa}, let us consider three
+linear equations,
+\[
+F_{1} = 0,\quad F_{2} = 0,\quad F_{3} = 0,
+\]
+the variables being either line co-ordinates or sphere co-ordinates.
+In the former case the three equations represent a \emph{set
+of lines}; \ie\ one of the two sets of straight lines of a hyperboloid
+of one sheet. It is well known that each line of either
+set intersects all the lines of the other. Transforming to sphere-geometry,
+%% -----File: 027.png---Folio 17-------
+we obtain a \emph{set of spheres} corresponding to each
+set of lines; and every sphere of either set must touch every
+sphere of the other set. This gives a configuration well
+known in geometry from other investigations; viz.\ all these
+spheres envelop a surface known as Dupin's cyclide. We
+have thus found a noteworthy correlation between the hyperboloid
+of one sheet and Dupin's cyclide.
+
+Perhaps the most striking example of the fruitfulness of this
+work of Lie's is his discovery that by means of this transformation
+the lines of curvature of a surface are transformed into
+asymptotic lines of the transformed surface, and \textit{vice versa}.
+This appears by taking the definition given above for the lines
+of curvature and translating it word for word into the language
+of line-geometry. Two problems in the infinitesimal geometry
+of surfaces, that had long been regarded as entirely distinct,
+are thus shown to be really identical. This must certainly be
+regarded as one of the most elegant contributions to differential
+geometry made in recent times.
+%% -----File: 028.png---Folio 18-------
+
+\Lecture{III.}{Sophus Lie.}
+
+\Date{(August 30, 1893.)}
+
+\First{The} distinction between analytic and algebraic functions,
+so important in pure analysis, enters also into the treatment
+of geometry.
+
+\emph{Analytic} functions are those that can be represented by a
+power series, convergent within a certain region bounded by
+the so-called circle of convergence. Outside of this region
+the analytic function is not regarded as given \textit{a~priori}; its
+continuation into wider regions remains a matter of special
+investigation and may give very different results, according to
+the particular case considered.
+
+On the other hand, an \emph{algebraic} function, $w = \text{Alg.}\,(z)$, is
+supposed to be known for the whole complex plane, having a
+finite number of values for every value of~$z$.
+
+Similarly, in geometry, we may confine our attention to a
+limited portion of an analytic curve or surface, as, for instance,
+in constructing the tangent, investigating the curvature,~etc.;
+or we may have to consider the whole extent of algebraic curves
+and surfaces in space.
+
+Almost the whole of the applications of the differential and
+integral calculus to geometry belongs to the former branch of
+geometry; and as this is what we are mainly concerned with in
+the present lecture, we need not restrict ourselves to algebraic
+functions, but may use the more general analytic functions
+confining ourselves always to limited portions of space. I
+%% -----File: 029.png---Folio 19-------
+thought it advisable to state this here once for all, since here in
+America the consideration of algebraic curves has perhaps been
+too predominant.
+
+The possibility of introducing new elements of space has been
+pointed out in the preceding lecture. To-day we shall use again
+a new space-element, consisting of an infinitesimal portion of a
+surface (or rather of its tangent plane) with a definite point in
+it. This is called, though not very properly, a \emph{surface-element}
+(\emph{Flächenelement}), and may perhaps be likened to an infinitesimal
+fish-scale. From a more abstract point of view it may be
+defined as simply the combination of a plane with a point in it.
+
+As the equation of a plane passing through a point~$(x, y, z)$
+can be written in the form
+\[
+z' - z = p(x' - x) + q(y' - y),
+\]
+$x'$,~$y'$,~$z'$ being the current co-ordinates, we have $x$,~$y$,~$z$, $p$,~$q$ as the
+co-ordinates of our surface-element, so that space becomes a
+fivefold manifoldness. If homogeneous co-ordinates be used,
+the point $(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4})$ and the plane $(u_{1}, u_{2}, u_{3}, u_{4})$ passing
+through it are connected by the condition
+\[
+x_{1}u_{1} + x_{2}u_{2} + x_{3}u_{3} + x_{4}u_{4} = 0,
+\]
+expressing their united position; and the number of independent
+constants is $3 + 3 - 1 = 5$, as before.
+
+Let us now see how ordinary geometry appears in this
+representation. A point, being the locus of all surface-elements
+passing through it, is represented as a manifoldness of two
+dimensions, let us say for shortness, an~$M_{2}$. A curve is represented
+by the totality of all those surface-elements that have
+their point on the curve and their plane passing through the
+tangent; these elements form again an~$M_{2}$. Finally, a surface
+is given by those surface-elements that have their point on the
+%% -----File: 030.png---Folio 20-------
+surface and their plane coincident with the tangent plane of the
+surface; they, too, form an~$M_{2}$.
+
+Moreover, all these~$M_{2}$'s have an important property in
+common: any two consecutive surface-elements belonging to
+the same point, curve, or surface always satisfy the condition
+\[
+dz - p\, dx - q\, dy = 0,
+\]
+which is a simple case of a Pfaffian relation; and conversely, if
+two surface-elements satisfy this condition, they belong to the
+same point, curve, or surface, as the case may be.
+
+Thus we have the highly interesting result that in the geometry
+of surface-elements points as well as curves and surfaces are
+brought under one head, being all represented by twofold manifoldnesses
+having the property just explained. This definition
+is the more important as there are no other~$M_{2}$'s having the
+same property.
+
+We now proceed to consider the very general kind of transformations
+called by Lie \emph{contact-transformations}. They are
+transformations that change our element $(x, y, z, p, q)$ into
+$(x', y', z', p', q')$ by such substitutions
+\[
+x' = \phi (x, y, z, p, q),\
+y' = \psi (x, y, z, p, q),\
+z' = \cdots,\
+p' = \cdots,\
+q' = \cdots,
+\]
+as will transform into itself the linear differential equation
+\[
+dz - p\, dx - q\, dy = 0.
+\]
+The geometrical meaning of the transformation is evidently that
+any~$M_{2}$ having the given property is changed into an~$M_{2}$ having
+the same property. Thus, for instance, a surface is transformed
+generally into a surface, or in special cases into a point or a
+curve. Moreover, let us consider two manifoldnesses~$M_{2}$ having
+a contact, \ie\ having a surface-element in common; these~$M_{2}$'s
+are changed by the transformation into two other~$M_{2}$'s having
+%% -----File: 031.png---Folio 21-------
+also a contact. From this characteristic the name given by
+Lie to the transformation will be understood.
+
+Contact-transformations are so important, and occur so frequently,
+that particular cases attracted the attention of geometers
+long ago, though not under this name and from this point
+of view, \ie\ not as contact-transformations, so that the true
+insight into their nature could not be obtained.
+
+Numerous examples of contact-transformations are given
+in my (lithographed) lectures on \textit{Höhere Geometrie}, delivered
+during the winter-semester of 1892--93. Thus, an example
+in two dimensions is found in the problem of wheel-gearing.
+The outline of the tooth of one wheel being given, it is here
+required to find the outline of the tooth of the other wheel,
+as I explained to you in my lecture at the Chicago Exhibition,
+with the aid of the models in the German university exhibit.
+
+Another example is found in the theory of perturbations in
+astronomy; Lagrange's method of variation of parameters as
+applied to the problem of three bodies is equivalent to a
+contact-transformation in a higher space.
+
+The group of $\infty^{15}$~substitutions considered yesterday in
+line-geometry is also a group of contact-transformations, both
+the collineations and reciprocations having this character.
+The reciprocations give the first well-known instance of the
+transformation of a point into a plane (\ie\ a surface), and a
+curve into a developable (\ie\ also a surface). These transformations
+of curves will here be considered as transforming
+the \emph{elements} of the points or curves into the \emph{elements} of the
+surface.
+
+Finally, we have examples of contact-transformations, not
+only in the transformations of spheres discussed in the last
+lecture, but even in the general transition from the line-geometry
+of Plücker to the sphere-geometry of Lie. Let us
+consider this last case somewhat more in detail.
+%% -----File: 032.png---Folio 22-------
+
+First of all, two lines that intersect have, of course, a
+surface-element in common; and as the two corresponding
+spheres must also have a surface-element in common, they
+will be in contact, as is actually the case for our transformation.
+It will be of interest to consider more closely the correlation
+between the surface-elements of a line and those of a sphere,
+although it is given by imaginary formulæ. Take, for instance,
+the totality of the surface-elements belonging to a circle on
+one of the spheres; we may call this a \emph{circular set} of elements.
+In line-geometry there corresponds the set of surface-elements
+along a generating line of a skew surface; and so on. The
+theorem regarding the transformation of the curves of curvature
+into asymptotic lines becomes now self-evident. Instead
+of the curve of curvature of a surface we have here to consider
+the corresponding elements of the surface which we may
+call a \emph{curvature set}. Similarly, an asymptotic line is replaced
+by the elements of the surface along this line; to this the name
+\emph{osculating set} may be given. The correspondence between the
+two sets is brought out immediately by considering that two
+consecutive elements of a curvature set belong to the same
+sphere, while two consecutive elements of an osculating set
+belong to the same straight line.
+
+One of the most important applications of contact-transformations
+is found in the theory of partial differential equations;
+I shall here confine myself to partial differential equations of
+the first order. From our new point of view, this theory
+assumes a much higher degree of perspicuity, and the true
+meaning of the terms ``solution,'' ``general solution,'' ``complete
+solution,'' ``singular solution,'' introduced by Lagrange
+and Monge, is brought out with much greater clearness.
+
+Let us consider the partial differential equation of the first
+order
+\[
+f(x, y, z, p, q) = 0.
+\]
+%% -----File: 033.png---Folio 23-------
+In the older theory, a distinction is made according to the way
+in which $p$~and~$q$ enter into the equation. Thus, when $p$ and~$q$
+enter only in the first degree, the equation is called linear.
+If $p$ and~$q$ should happen to be both absent, the equation would
+not be regarded as a differential equation at all. From the
+higher point of view of Lie's new geometry, this distinction
+disappears entirely, as will be seen in what follows.
+
+The number of all surface elements in the whole of space is
+of course~$\infty^{5}$. By writing down our equation we single out
+from these a manifoldness of four dimensions,~$M_{4}$, of $\infty^{4}$~elements.
+Now, to find a ``solution'' of the equation in Lie's
+sense means to single out from this~$M_{4}$ a twofold manifoldness,~$M_{2}$,
+of the characteristic property; whether this~$M_{2}$ be a point,
+a curve, or a surface, is here regarded as indifferent. What
+Lagrange calls finding a ``complete solution'' consists in
+dividing the~$M_{4}$ into $\infty^{2}$~$M_{2}$'s. This can of course be done
+in an infinite number of ways. Finally, if any singly infinite
+set be taken out of the $\infty^{2}$~$M_{2}$'s, we have in the envelope of
+this set what Lagrange calls a ``general solution.'' These
+formulations hold quite generally for \emph{all} partial differential
+equations of the first order, even for the most specialized forms.
+
+To illustrate, by an example, in what sense an equation of
+the form $f(x, y, z) = 0$ may be regarded as a partial differential
+equation and what is the meaning of its solutions, let
+us consider the very special case $z = 0$. While in ordinary
+co-ordinates this equation represents all the \emph{points} of the $xy$-plane,
+in Lie's system it represents of course all the \emph{surface-elements}
+whose points lie in the plane. Nothing is so simple
+as to assign a ``complete solution'' in this case; we have only
+to take the $\infty^{2}$~points of the plane themselves, each point being
+an~$M_{2}$ of the equation. To derive from this the ``general solution,''
+we must take all possible singly infinite sets of points
+in the plane, \ie\ any curve whatever, and form the envelope
+%% -----File: 034.png---Folio 24-------
+of the surface-elements belonging to the points; in other words,
+we must take the elements touching the curve. Finally, the
+plane itself represents of course a ``singular solution.''
+
+Now, the very high interest and importance of this simple
+illustration lies in the fact that by a contact-transformation
+every partial differential equation of the first order can be
+changed into this particular form $z = 0$. Hence the whole disposition
+of the solutions outlined above holds quite generally.
+
+A new and deeper insight is thus gained through Lie's
+theory into the meaning of problems that have long been
+regarded as classical, while at the same time a full array of
+new problems is brought to light and finds here its answer.
+
+It can here only be briefly mentioned that Lie has done much
+in applying similar principles to the theory of partial differential
+equations of the second order.
+
+At the present time Lie is best known through his theory of
+continuous groups of transformations, and at first glance it
+might appear as if there were but little connection between this
+theory and the geometrical considerations that engaged our
+attention in the last two lectures. I think it therefore desirable
+to point out here this connection. \emph{It has been the final
+aim of Lie from the beginning to make progress in the theory
+of differential equations}; and as subsidiary to this end may be
+regarded both the geometrical developments considered in these
+lectures and the theory of continuous groups.
+
+For further particulars concerning the subjects of the present
+as well as the two preceding lectures, I may refer to my (lithographed)
+lectures on \textit{Höhere Geometrie}, delivered at Göttingen,
+in 1892--93. The theory of surface-elements is also fully developed
+in the second volume of the \textit{Theorie der Transformationsgruppen},
+by Lie and Engel (Leipzig, Teubner, 1890).
+%% -----File: 035.png---Folio 25-------
+
+\Lecture[Algebraic Curves and Surfaces.]
+{IV.}{On the Real Shape of Algebraic
+Curves and Surfaces.}
+
+\Date{(August 31, 1893.)}
+
+\First{We} turn now to \emph{algebraic} functions, and in particular to the
+question of the actual geometric forms corresponding to such
+functions. The question as to the reality of geometric forms
+and the actual shape of algebraic curves and surfaces was somewhat
+neglected for a long time. Otherwise it would be difficult
+to explain, for instance, why the connection between Cayley's
+theory of projective measurement and the non-Euclidean geometry
+should not have been perceived at once. As these questions
+are even now less well known than they deserve to be, I
+proceed to give here an historical sketch of the subject, without,
+however, attempting completeness.
+
+It must be counted among the lasting merits of Sir~Isaac
+Newton that he first investigated the shape of the plane curves
+of the third order. His \textit{Enumeratio linearum tertii ordinis}\footnote
+ {First published as an appendix to Newton's \textit{Opticks}, 1704.}
+shows that he had a very clear conception of projective
+geometry; for he says that all curves of the third order can
+be derived by central projection from five fundamental types
+(\Fig{1}). But I wish to direct your particular attention to the
+paper by Möbius, \textit{Ueber die Grundformen der Linien der dritten
+Ordnung},\footnote
+ {Abhandlungen der Königl.\ Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, math.-phys.\
+ Klasse, Vol.~I (1852), pp.~1--82; reprinted in Möbius' \textit{Gesammelte Werke},
+ Vol.~III (1886), pp.~89--176.}
+where the forms of the cubic curves are derived by
+%% -----File: 036.png---Folio 26-------
+purely geometric considerations. Owing to its remarkable
+elegance of treatment, this paper has given the impulse to
+all the subsequent researches in this line that I shall have
+to mention.
+
+In 1872 we considered, in Göttingen, the question as to the
+shape of surfaces of the third order. As a particular case,
+Clebsch at this time constructed his beautiful model of the
+%[Illustration: Fig.~1.]
+\Figure{036}
+\emph{diagonal surface}, with $27$~real lines, which I showed to you at
+the Exhibition. The equation of this surface may be written
+in the simple form
+\[
+\sum_{1}^{5}x_{i} = 0,\quad \sum_{1}^{5}x^{3}_{i} = 0,
+\]
+which shows that the surface can be transformed into itself by
+the $120$~permutations of the~$x$'s.
+
+It may here be mentioned as a general rule, that in selecting
+a particular case for constructing a model the first prerequisite
+is regularity. By selecting a symmetrical form for
+the model, not only is the execution simplified, but what is of
+more importance, the model will be of such a character as to
+impress itself readily on the mind.
+
+Instigated by this investigation of Clebsch, I turned to the
+general problem of determining all possible forms of cubic surfaces.\footnote
+ {See my paper \textit{Ueber Flächen dritter Ordnung}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~6 (1873),
+ pp.~551--581.}
+%% -----File: 037.png---Folio 27-------
+I established the fact that by the principle of continuity
+all forms of real surfaces of the third order can be derived
+from the particular surface having four real conical points.
+This surface, also, I exhibited to you at the World's Fair, and
+pointed out how the diagonal surface can be derived from it.
+But what is of primary importance is the completeness of
+enumeration resulting from my point of view; it would be of
+comparatively little value to derive any number of special forms
+if it cannot be proved that the method used exhausts the
+subject. Models of the typical cases of all the principal forms
+of cubic surfaces have since been constructed by Rodenberg for
+Brill's collection.
+
+In the 7th~volume of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1874) Zeuthen\footnote
+ {\textit{Sur les différentes formes des courbes planes du quatrième ordre}, pp.~410--432.}
+has
+discussed the various forms of plane curves of the fourth order~$(C_{4})$.
+He
+%[Illustration: Fig.~2.]
+\WFigure{1.25in}{037}
+considers in particular the reality
+of the double tangents on these curves. The
+number of such tangents is~$28$, and they are
+all real when the curve consists of four separate
+closed portions (\Fig{2}). What is of particular
+interest is the relation of Zeuthen's
+researches on quartic curves to my own researches
+on cubic surfaces, as explained by
+Zeuthen himself.\footnote
+ {\textit{Études des propriétés de situation des surfaces cubiques}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~8
+ (1875), pp.~1--30.}
+It had been observed before, by Geiser, that
+if a cubic surface be projected on a plane from a point on the
+surface, the contour of the projection is a quartic curve, and
+that every quartic curve can be generated in this way. If a
+surface with four conical points be chosen, the resulting quartic
+has four double points; that is, it breaks up into two conics
+%% -----File: 038.png---Folio 28-------
+(\Fig{3}). By considering the shaded portions in the figure it
+will readily be seen how, by the principle of continuity, the four
+ovals of the quartic (\Fig{2}) are obtained. This corresponds
+exactly to the derivation of the diagonal
+surface from the cubic surface having four
+conical points.
+
+The attempts to extend this application
+of the principle of continuity so as to gain
+an insight into the shape of curves of the
+$n$th~order have hitherto proved futile, as
+far as a general classification and an enumeration
+of all fundamental forms is concerned. Still, some
+important results have been obtained. A paper by Harnack\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Vieltheiligkeit der ebenen algebraischen Curven}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~10
+ (1876), pp.~189--198.}
+and a more recent
+%[Illustration: Fig.~3.]
+\WFigure{1.5in}{038}
+one by Hilbert\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die reellen Züge algebraischer Curven}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~38 (1891),
+ pp.~115--138.}
+are here to be mentioned.
+Harnack finds that, if $p$~be the deficiency of the curve, the
+maximum number of separate branches the curve can have is~$p + 1$;
+and a curve with $p + 1$~branches actually exists. Hilbert's
+paper contains a large number of interesting special
+results which from their nature cannot be included in the
+present brief summary.
+
+I myself have found a curious relation between the numbers
+of real singularities.\footnote
+ {\textit{Eine neue Relation zwischen den Singularitäten einer algebraischen Curve},
+ Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~10 (1876), pp.~199--209.}
+Denoting the order of the curve by~$n$,
+the class by~$k$, and considering only simple singularities, we
+may have three kinds of double points, say $d'$~ordinary and $d''$~isolated
+real double points, besides imaginary double points;
+then there may be $r'$~real cusps, besides imaginary cusps; and
+similarly, by the principle of duality, $t'$~ordinary, $t''$~isolated
+%% -----File: 039.png---Folio 29-------
+real double tangents, besides imaginary double tangents; also
+$w'$~real inflexions, besides imaginary inflexions. Then it can
+be proved by means of the principle of continuity, that the
+following relation must hold:
+\[
+n + w' + 2t'' = k + r' + 2d''.
+\]
+
+This general law contains everything that is known as to
+curves of the third or fourth orders. It has been somewhat
+extended in a more algebraic sense by several writers. Moreover,
+Brill, in Vol.~16 of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1880),\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Singularitäten ebener algebraischer Curven und eine neue Curvenspecies},
+ pp.~348--408.}
+has shown
+how the formula must be modified when higher singularities are
+involved.
+
+As regards quartic surfaces, Rohn has investigated an enormous
+number of special cases; but a complete enumeration he
+has not
+%[Illustration: Fig.~4.]
+\WFigure{1.5in}{039}
+reached. Among the special
+surfaces of the fourth order the Kummer
+surface with $16$~conical points is
+one of the most important. The
+models constructed by Plücker in
+connection with his theory of complexes
+of lines all represent special
+cases of the Kummer surface. Some
+types of this surface are also included
+in the Brill collection. But all these
+models are now of less importance,
+since Rohn found the following interesting
+and comprehensive result.
+Imagine a quadric surface with four generating lines of each set
+(\Fig{4}). According to the character of the surface and the
+reality, non-reality, or coincidence of these lines, a large number
+of special cases is possible; all these cases, however, must be
+%% -----File: 040.png---Folio 30-------
+treated alike. We may here confine ourselves to the case of
+an hyperboloid of one sheet with four distinct lines of each
+set. These lines divide the surface into $16$~regions. Shading
+the alternate regions as in the figure, and regarding the shaded
+regions as double, the unshaded regions being disregarded, we
+have a surface consisting of eight separate closed portions hanging
+together only at the points of intersection of the lines; and
+this is a Kummer surface with $16$~real double points. Rohn's
+researches on the Kummer surface will be found in the \textit{Math.\
+Annalen}, Vol.~18 (1881);\footnote
+ {\textit{Die verschiedenen Gestalten der Kummer'schen Fläche}, pp.~99--159.}
+his more general investigations on
+quartic surfaces, \textit{ib}., Vol.~29 (1887).\footnote
+ {\textit{Die Flächen vierter Ordnung hinsichtlich ihrer Knotenpunkte und ihrer Gestaltung},
+ pp.~81--96.}
+
+There is still another mode of dealing with the shape of
+curves (not of surfaces), viz.\ by means of the theory of Riemann.
+The first problem that here presents itself is to establish
+the connection between a plane curve and a Riemann surface,
+as I have done in Vol.~7 of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1874).\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber eine neue Art der Riemann'schen Flächen}, pp.~558--566.}
+Let us consider a cubic curve; its deficiency is $p = 1$. Now it
+is well known that in Riemann's theory this deficiency is a
+measure of the connectivity of the corresponding Riemann surface,
+which, therefore, in the present case, must be that of a
+\emph{tore}, or anchor-ring. The question then arises: what has the
+anchor-ring to do with the cubic curve? The connection will
+best be understood by considering the curve of the third \emph{class}
+whose shape is represented in \Fig{5}. It is easy to see that of
+%[Illustration: Fig.~5.] [** TN: Moved up one paragraph]
+\Figure[1.75in]{041}
+the three tangents that can be drawn to this curve from any
+point in its plane, all three will be real if the point be selected
+outside the oval branch, or inside the triangular branch; but that
+only one of the three tangents will be real for any point in the
+shaded region, while the other two tangents are imaginary. As
+%% -----File: 041.png---Folio 31-------
+there are thus two imaginary tangents corresponding to each
+point of this region, let us imagine it covered with a double
+leaf; along the curve the two leaves must, of course, be
+regarded as joined. Thus we obtain a surface which can be
+considered as a Riemann surface belonging to the curve, each
+point of the surface corresponding to a single tangent of the
+curve. Here, then, we have our anchor-ring. If on such a surface
+we study integrals, they will be of double periodicity, and
+the true reason is thus disclosed for the connection of elliptic
+integrals with the curves of the third class, and hence, owing
+to the relation of duality, with the curves of the third order.
+
+To make a further advance, I passed to the general theory
+of Riemann surfaces. To real curves will of course correspond
+\emph{symmetrical} Riemann surfaces, \ie\ surfaces that reproduce
+themselves by a conformal transformation of the second kind
+(\ie\ a transformation that inverts the sense of the angles).
+Now it is easy to enumerate the different symmetrical types
+belonging to a given~$p$. The result is that there are altogether
+$p+1$~``diasymmetric'' and $\left[\dfrac{p+1}{2}\right]$~``orthosymmetric'' cases.
+If we denote as a line of symmetry any line whose points
+%% -----File: 042.png---Folio 32-------
+remain unchanged by the conformal transformation, the diasymmetric
+cases contain respectively $p$, $p-1$,~$\dots$ $2$,~$1$,~$0$ lines
+of symmetry, and the orthosymmetric cases contain $p+1$,~$p-1$,
+$p-3$,~$\dots$ such lines. A surface is called diasymmetric or orthosymmetric
+according as it does not or does break up into two
+parts by cuts carried along all the lines of symmetry. This
+enumeration, then, will contain a general classification of real
+curves, as indicated first in my pamphlet on Riemann's theory.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Riemann's Theorie der algebraischen Functionen und ihrer Integrale},
+ Leipzig, Teubner, 1882. An English translation by Frances Hardcastle (London,
+ Macmillan) has just appeared.}
+In the summer of 1892 I resumed the theory and developed
+a large number of propositions concerning the reality of the
+roots of those equations connected with our curves that can be
+treated by means of the Abelian integrals. Compare the last
+volume of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Realitätsverhältnisse bei der einem beliebigen Geschlechte zugehörigen
+ Normalcurve der~$\phi$}, Vol.~42 (1893), pp.~1--29.}
+and my (lithographed) lectures
+on \textit{Riemann'sche Flächen}, Part~II\@.
+
+In the same manner in which we have to-day considered
+ordinary algebraic curves and surfaces, it would be interesting
+to investigate \emph{all} algebraic configurations so as to arrive at a
+truly geometrical intuition of these objects.
+
+In concluding, I wish to insist in particular on what I regard
+as the principal characteristic of the geometrical methods that I
+have discussed to-day: these methods give us an \emph{actual mental
+image} of the configuration under discussion, and this I consider
+as most essential in all true geometry. For this reason the
+so-called synthetic methods, as usually developed, do not appear
+to me very satisfactory. While giving elaborate constructions
+for special cases and details they fail entirely to afford a general
+view of the configurations as a whole.
+%% -----File: 043.png---Folio 33-------
+
+\Lecture{V.}{Theory of Functions and
+Geometry.}
+
+\Date{(September 1, 1893.)}
+
+\First{A geometrical} representation of a function of a complex
+variable $w = f(z)$, where $w = u + iv$ and $z = x + iy$, can be obtained
+by constructing models of the two surfaces $u = \phi (x, y)$,
+$v = \psi (x, y)$. This idea is realized in the models constructed
+by Dyck, which I have shown to you at the Exhibition.
+
+Another well-known method, proposed by Riemann, consists
+in representing each of the two complex variables in the usual
+way in a plane. To every point in the $z$-plane will correspond
+one or more points in the $w$-plane; as $z$~moves in its plane, $w$~describes
+a corresponding curve in the other plane. I may
+refer to the work of Holzmüller\footnote
+ {\textit{Einführung in die Theorie der isogonalen Verwandtschaften und der conformen
+ Abbildungen, verbunden mit Anwendungen auf mathematische Physik}, Leipzig,
+ Teubner, 1882.}
+as a good elementary introduction
+to this subject, especially on account of the large
+number of special cases there worked out and illustrated by
+drawings.
+
+In higher investigations, what is of interest is not so much
+the corresponding curves as corresponding areas or \emph{regions}
+of the two planes. According to Riemann's fundamental
+theorem concerning conformal representation, two simply connected
+regions can always be made to correspond to each other
+conformally, so that either is the conformal representation
+%% -----File: 044.png---Folio 34-------
+(\textit{Abbildung}) of the other. The three constants at our disposal
+in this correspondence allow us to select three arbitrary points
+on the boundary of one region as corresponding to three arbitrary
+points on the boundary of the other region. Thus
+Riemann's theory affords a geometrical definition for any function
+whatever by means of its conformal representation.
+
+This suggests the inquiry as to what conclusions can be
+drawn from this method concerning the nature of transcendental
+functions. Next to the elementary transcendental functions
+the elliptic functions are usually regarded as the most
+important. There is, however, another class for which at
+least equal importance must be claimed on account of their
+numerous applications in astronomy and mathematical physics;
+these are the \emph{hypergeometric functions}, so called owing to their
+connection with Gauss's hypergeometric series.
+
+The hypergeometric functions can be defined as the integrals
+of the following linear differential equation of the second order:
+\begin{multline*}
+\frac{d^{2}w}{dz^{2}}
+ + \biggl[\frac{1 - \lambda' - \lambda''}{z - a} (a - b)(a - c)
+ + \frac{1 - \mu' - \mu''}{z - b} (b - c)(b - a) \\
+ + \frac{1 - \nu' - \nu'' }{z - c } (c - a)(c - b)\biggr] \frac{dw}{dz}
+ + \biggl[\frac{\lambda' \lambda'' (a - b)(a - c)}{z - a} \\
+ + \frac{\mu' \mu'' (b - c)(b - a)}{z - b}
+ + \frac{\nu' \nu'' (c - a)(c - b)}{z - c}\biggr]
+ \frac{w}{(z - a)(z - b)(z - c)}= 0,
+\end{multline*}
+where~$z = a$, $b$,~$c$ are the three singular points and $\lambda'$,~$\lambda''$; $\mu'$,~$\mu''$;
+$\nu'$,~$\nu''$ are the so-called exponents belonging respectively to
+$a$,~$b$,~$c$.
+
+If $w_{1}$~be a particular solution, $w_{2}$~another, the general solution
+can be put in the form $\alpha w_{1} + \beta w_{2}$, where $\alpha$,~$\beta$ are arbitrary constants;
+so that
+\[
+\alpha w_{1} + \beta w_{2}\quad \text{and}\quad \gamma w_{1} + \delta w_{2}
+\]
+represent a pair of general solutions.
+%% -----File: 045.png---Folio 35-------
+
+If we now introduce the quotient $\dfrac{w_{1}}{w_{2}} = \eta (z)$ as a new variable,
+its most general value is
+% [** TN: Inline equation in original]
+\[
+\frac{\alpha w_{1} + \beta w_{2}}{\gamma w_{1} + \delta w_{2}} =
+\frac{\alpha\eta + \beta}{\gamma\eta + \delta}
+\]
+and contains therefore
+three arbitrary constants. Hence $\eta$~satisfies a differential
+equation of the third order which is readily found to be
+\begin{multline*}
+\frac{\eta'''}{\eta'} - \tfrac{3}{2} \left(\frac{\eta''}{\eta'}\right)^{2}\\
+ = \frac{1}{(z - a)(z - b)(z - c)}
+ \Biggl[\frac{\ \dfrac{1 - \lambda^{2}}{2}\ }{z - a} (a - b)(a - c)
+ + \frac{\ \dfrac{1 - \mu^{2}}{2}\ }{z - b} (b - c)(b - a)\\
+ + \frac{\ \dfrac{1 - \nu^{2}}{2}\ }{z - c} (c - a)(c - b)\Biggr],
+\end{multline*}
+in which the left-hand member has the property of not being
+changed by a linear substitution, and is therefore called a differential
+invariant. Cayley has named this function the Schwarzian
+derivative; it has formed the starting-point for Sylvester's
+investigations on reciprocants. In the right-hand member,
+\[
+±\lambda = \lambda' - \lambda'', \quad ±\mu = \mu' - \mu'', \quad ±\nu = \nu' - \nu''.
+\]
+
+As to the conformal representation (\Fig{6}), it can be shown
+that the upper half of the $z$-plane, with the points $a$,~$b$,~$c$ on
+%[Illustration: Fig.~6.]
+\Figure{045}
+the real axis and $\lambda$,~$\mu$,~$\nu$ assumed as real, is transformed for each
+branch of the $\eta$-function into a triangular area~$abc$ bounded by
+%% -----File: 046.png---Folio 36-------
+three circular arcs; let us call such an area a \emph{circular triangle}
+(\emph{Kreisbogendreieck}). The angles at the vertices of this triangle
+are $\lambda\pi$,~$\mu\pi$,~$\nu\pi$.
+
+This, then, is the geometrical representation we have to
+take as our basis. In order to derive from it conclusions as
+to the nature of the transcendental functions defined by the
+differential equation, it will evidently be necessary to inquire
+what are the forms of such circular triangles in the most
+general case. For it is to be noticed that there is no restriction
+laid upon the values of the constants $\lambda$,~$\mu$,~$\nu$, so that the
+angles of our triangle are not necessarily acute, nor even
+convex; in other words, in the general case the vertices will
+be branch-points. The triangle itself is here to be regarded
+as something like an extensible and flexible membrane spread
+out between the circles forming the boundary.
+
+I have investigated this question in a paper published in
+the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~37.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Nullstellen der hypergeometrischen Reihe}, pp.~573--590.}
+It will be convenient to project
+the plane containing the circular triangle stereographically on
+a sphere. The question then is as to the most general form
+of spherical triangles, taking this term in a generalized meaning
+as denoting any triangle on the sphere bounded by the intersections
+of three planes with the sphere, whether the planes
+intersect at the centre or not.
+
+This is really a question of elementary geometry; and it is
+interesting to notice how often in recent times higher research
+has led back to elementary problems not previously
+settled.
+
+The result in the present case is that there are two, and
+only two, species of such generalized triangles. They are
+obtained from the so-called elementary triangle by two distinct
+operations: (\textit{a})~\emph{lateral}, (\textit{b})~\emph{polar attachment} of a circle.
+%% -----File: 047.png---Folio 37-------
+
+Let $abc$ (\Fig{7}) be the elementary spherical triangle. Then
+the operation of lateral attachment consists in attaching to
+the area~$abc$ the area enclosed by one of the sides, say~$bc$,
+this side being produced so as to form a complete circle.
+The process can, of course, be repeated any number of times
+and applied to each side. If one circular area be attached at~$bc$,
+the angles at $b$~and~$c$ are increased each by~$\pi$; if the
+whole sphere be attached, by~$2\pi$,~etc. The vertices in this
+way become branch-points. A triangle so obtained I call a\DPnote{** TN: italicized in original}
+\emph{triangle of the first species}.
+
+%[Illustration: Fig.~7.]
+%[Illustration: Fig.~8.]
+\Figures{1.625in}{047a}{1.75in}{047b}
+A \emph{triangle of the second species} is produced by the process
+of polar attachment of a circle, say at~$bc$; the whole area
+bounded by the circle~$bc$ is, in this case, connected with the
+original triangle along a branch-cut reaching from the vertex~$a$
+to some point on~$bc$. The point~$a$ becomes a branch-point,
+its angle being increased by~$2\pi$. Moreover, lateral attachments
+can be made at $ab$~and~$ac$.
+
+The two species of triangles are now characterized as follows:
+\emph{the first species may have any number of lateral attachments
+at any or all of the three sides, while the second has a polar
+attachment to one vertex and the opposite side, and may have
+lateral attachments to the other two sides}.
+%% -----File: 048.png---Folio 38-------
+
+Analytically the two species are distinguished by inequalities
+between the absolute values of the constants $\lambda$,~$\mu$,~$\nu$. For
+the first species, none of the three constants is greater than
+the sum of the other two, \ie\
+\[
+|\lambda| \leqq |\mu| + |\nu|, \quad
+|\mu| \leqq |\nu| + |\lambda|, \quad
+|\nu| \leqq |\lambda| + |\mu|;
+\]
+for the second species,
+\[
+|\lambda| \geqq |\mu| + |\nu|,
+\]
+where $\lambda$ refers to the pole.
+
+For the application to the theory of functions, it is important
+to determine, in the case of the second species, the
+number of times the circle formed by the side opposite the
+vertex is passed around. I have found this number to be
+$E\left(\dfrac{|\lambda| - |\mu| - |\nu| + 1}{2}\right)$, where $E$~denotes the greatest positive
+integer contained in the argument, and is therefore always zero
+when this argument happens to be negative or fractional.
+
+Let us now apply these geometrical ideas to the theory of
+hypergeometric functions. I can here only point out one of
+the results obtained. Considering only the real values that
+$\eta = w_{1}/w_{2}$ can assume between $a$ and~$b$, the question presents
+itself as to the shape of the $\eta$-curve between these limits.
+Let us consider for a moment the curves $w_{1}$ and~$w_{2}$. It is
+well known that, if $w_{1}$~oscillates between $a$ and~$b$ from one
+side of the axis to the other, $w_{2}$~will also oscillate; their
+quotient $\eta = w_{1}/w_{2}$ is represented by a curve that consists of
+separate branches extending from $-\infty$ to~$+\infty$, somewhat like
+the curve $y = \tan x$. Now it appears as the result of the
+investigation that the number of these branches, and therefore
+the number of the oscillations of $w_{1}$~and~$w_{2}$, is given precisely
+by the number of circuits of the point~$c$; that is to say, it is
+$E\left(\dfrac{|\nu| - |\lambda| - |\mu| + 1}{2}\right)$. This is a result of importance for all
+%% -----File: 049.png---Folio 39-------
+applications of hypergeometric functions which was derived
+only later (by Hurwitz) by means of Sturm's methods.
+
+I wish to call your particular attention not so much to the
+result itself, however interesting it may be, as to the geometrical
+method adopted in deriving it. More advanced researches on a
+similar line of thought are now being carried on at Göttingen
+by myself and others.
+
+When a differential equation with a larger number of singular
+points than three is the object of investigation, the triangles
+must be replaced by quadrangles and other polygons. In my
+lithographed lectures on \textit{Linear Differential Equations}, delivered
+in 1890--91, I have thrown out some suggestions regarding
+the treatment of such cases. The difficulty arising in these
+generalizations is, strange to say, merely of a geometrical
+nature, viz.\ the difficulty of obtaining a general view of the
+possible forms of the polygons.
+
+Meanwhile, Dr.~Schoenflies has published a paper on rectilinear
+polygons of any number of sides\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Kreisbogenpolygone}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~42, pp.~377--408.}
+while Dr.\ Van~Vleck
+has considered such rectilinear polygons together with the
+functions they define, the polygons being defined in so general
+a way as to admit branch-points even in the interior. Dr.~Schoenflies
+has also treated the case of circular quadrangles,
+the result being somewhat complicated.
+
+In all these investigations the singular points of the $z$-plane
+corresponding to the vertices of the polygons are of course
+assumed to be real, as are also their exponents. There remains
+the still more general question how to represent by conformal
+correspondence the functions in the case when some of these
+elements are complex. In this direction I have to mention the
+name of Dr.~Schilling who has treated the case of the ordinary
+hypergeometric function on the assumption of complex exponents.
+%% -----File: 050.png---Folio 40-------
+
+This treatment of the functions defined by linear differential
+equations of the second order is of course only an example
+of the general discussion of complex functions by means of
+geometry. I hope that many more interesting results will be
+obtained in the future by such geometrical methods.
+%% -----File: 051.png---Folio 41-------
+
+%[** TN: Added comma matches table of contents]
+\Lecture[Mathematical Character of Space-Intuition]
+{VI.}{On the Mathematical Character
+of Space-Intuition\DPtypo{}{,} and the
+Relation of Pure Mathematics to
+the Applied Sciences.}
+
+\Date{(September 2, 1893.)}
+
+\First{In} the preceding lectures I have laid so much stress on
+geometrical methods that the inquiry naturally presents itself
+as to the real nature and limitations of geometrical intuition.
+
+In my address before the Congress of Mathematics at Chicago
+I referred to the distinction between what I called the
+\emph{naïve} and the \emph{refined} intuition. It is the latter that we find in
+Euclid; he carefully develops his system on the basis of well-formulated
+axioms, is fully conscious of the necessity of exact
+proofs, clearly distinguishes between the commensurable and
+incommensurable, and so forth.
+
+The naïve intuition, on the other hand, was especially active
+during the period of the genesis of the differential and integral
+calculus. Thus we see that Newton assumes without hesitation
+the existence, in every case, of a velocity in a moving point,
+without troubling himself with the inquiry whether there might
+not be continuous functions having no derivative.
+
+At the present time we are wont to build up the infinitesimal
+calculus on a purely analytical basis, and this shows that
+we are living in a \emph{critical} period similar to that of Euclid.
+It is my private conviction, although I may perhaps not be
+able to fully substantiate it with complete proofs, that Euclid's
+%% -----File: 052.png---Folio 42-------
+period also must have been preceded by a ``naïve'' stage of
+development. Several facts that have become known only
+quite recently point in this direction. Thus it is now known
+that the books that have come down to us from the time of
+Euclid constitute only a very small part of what was then
+in existence; moreover, much of the teaching was done by
+oral tradition. Not many of the books had that artistic finish
+that we admire in Euclid's ``Elements''; the majority were
+in the form of improvised lectures, written out for the use
+of the students. The investigations of Zeuthen\footnote
+ {\textit{Die Lehre von den Kegelschnitten im Altertum}, übersetzt von R.~v.~Fischer-Benzon,
+ Kopenhagen, Höst, 1886.}
+and Allman\footnote
+ {\textit{Greek geometry from Thales to Euclid}, Dublin, Hodges, 1889.}
+have done much to clear up these historical conditions.
+
+If we now ask how we can account for this distinction
+between the naïve and refined intuition, I must say that, in
+my opinion, the root of the matter lies in the fact that \emph{the
+naïve intuition is not exact, while the refined intuition is not
+properly intuition at all, but arises through the logical development
+from axioms considered as perfectly exact}.
+
+To explain the meaning of the first half of this statement it
+is my opinion that, in our naïve intuition, when thinking of
+a point we do not picture to our mind an abstract mathematical
+point, but substitute something concrete for it. In imagining
+a line, we do not picture to
+%[Illustration: Fig.~9.]
+\WFigure{1.5in}{052}
+ourselves ``length without
+breadth,'' but a \emph{strip} of a certain width.
+Now such a strip has of course \emph{always}
+a tangent (\Fig{9}); \ie\ we can always
+imagine a straight strip having a small
+portion (element) in common with the curved strip; similarly
+with respect to the osculating circle. The definitions in this
+case are regarded as holding only approximately, or as far as
+may be necessary.
+%% -----File: 053.png---Folio 43-------
+
+The ``exact'' mathematicians will of course say that such
+definitions are not definitions at all. But I maintain that in
+ordinary life we actually operate with such inexact definitions.
+Thus we speak without hesitancy of the direction and curvature
+of a river or a road, although the ``line'' in this case has certainly
+considerable width.
+
+As regards the second half of my proposition, there actually
+are many cases where the conclusions derived by purely logical
+reasoning from exact definitions can no more be verified by
+intuition. To show this, I select examples from the theory of
+automorphic functions, because in more common geometrical
+illustrations our judgment is warped by the familiarity of the
+ideas.
+
+Let any number of non-intersecting circles $1$,~$2$,~$3$, $4$,~$\dots$, be
+given (\Fig{10}), and let every circle be reflected (\ie\ transformed
+%[Illustration: Fig.~10.]
+\Figure[3in]{053}
+by inversion, or reciprocal radii vectores) upon every other circle;
+then repeat this operation again and again, \textit{ad~infinitum}. The
+question is, what will be the configuration formed by the totality
+%% -----File: 054.png---Folio 44-------
+of all the circles, and in particular what will be the position of
+the limiting points. There is no difficulty in answering these
+questions by purely logical reasoning; but the imagination
+seems to fail utterly when we try to form a mental image of
+the result.
+
+Again, let a series of circles be given, each circle touching the
+following, while the last touches the first (\Fig{11}). Every circle
+is now reflected upon every other just as in the preceding example,
+and the process is repeated indefinitely. The special case
+when the original points of contact happen to lie on a circle
+%[Illustration: Fig.~11.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{054}
+being excluded, it can be shown analytically that the continuous
+curve which is the locus of all the points of contact \emph{is not an
+analytic curve}. The points of contact form a manifoldness that
+is everywhere dense on the curve (in the sense of G.~Cantor),
+although there are intermediate points between them. At
+each of the former points there is a determinate tangent,
+while there is none at the intermediate points. Second derivatives
+do not exist at all. It is easy enough to imagine a \emph{strip}
+covering all these points; but when the width of the strip is
+reduced beyond a certain limit, we find undulations, and it seems
+impossible to clearly picture to the mind the final outcome.
+It is to be noticed that we have here an example of a curve
+%% -----File: 055.png---Folio 45-------
+with indeterminate derivatives arising out of purely geometrical
+considerations, while it might be supposed from the usual
+treatment of such curves that they can only be defined by
+artificial analytical series.
+
+Unfortunately, I am not in a position to give a full account
+of the opinions of philosophers on this subject. As regards
+the more recent mathematical literature, I have presented my
+views as developed above in a paper published in~1873, and
+since reprinted in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber den allgemeinen Functionsbegriff und dessen Darstellung durch eine
+ willkürliche Curve}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~22 (1883), pp.~249--259.}
+Ideas agreeing in
+general with mine have been expressed by Pasch, of Giessen,
+in two works, one on the foundations of geometry,\footnote
+ {\textit{Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1882.}
+the other
+on the principles of the infinitesimal calculus.\footnote
+ {\textit{Einleitung in die Differential- und Integralrechnung}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1882.}
+Another
+author, Köpcke, of Hamburg, has advanced the idea that our
+space-intuition is exact as far as it goes, but so limited as to
+make it impossible for us to picture to ourselves curves without
+tangents.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Differentiirbarkeit und Anschaulichkeit der stetigen Functionen}, Math.\
+ Annalen, Vol.~29 (1887), pp.~123--140.}
+
+On one point Pasch does not agree with me, and that is as to
+the exact value of the axioms. He believes---and this is the
+traditional view---that it is possible finally to discard intuition
+entirely, basing the whole science on the axioms alone. I am
+of the opinion that, certainly, for the purposes of research it is
+always necessary to combine the intuition with the axioms. I
+do not believe, for instance, that it would have been possible to
+derive the results discussed in my former lectures, the splendid
+researches of Lie, the continuity of the shape of algebraic curves
+and surfaces, or the most general forms of triangles, without
+the constant use of geometrical intuition.
+%% -----File: 056.png---Folio 46-------
+
+Pasch's idea of building up the science purely on the basis of
+the axioms has since been carried still farther by Peano, in his
+logical calculus.
+
+Finally, it must be said that the degree of exactness of the
+intuition of space may be different in different individuals, perhaps
+even in different races.\DPnote{** Yikes} It would seem as if a strong
+naïve space-intuition were an attribute pre-eminently of the
+Teutonic race, while the critical, purely logical sense is more
+fully developed in the Latin and Hebrew races. A full investigation
+of this subject, somewhat on the lines suggested by
+Francis Galton in his researches on heredity, might be interesting.
+
+What has been said above with regard to geometry ranges
+this science among the applied sciences. A few general
+remarks on these sciences and their relation to pure mathematics
+will here not be out of place. From the point of view
+of pure mathematical science I should lay particular stress on
+the \emph{heuristic value} of the applied sciences as an aid to discovering
+new truths in mathematics. Thus I have shown (in my
+little book on Riemann's theories) that the Abelian integrals
+can best be understood and illustrated by considering electric
+currents on closed surfaces. In an analogous way, theorems
+concerning differential equations can be derived from the consideration
+of sound-vibrations; and so on.
+
+But just at present I desire to speak of more practical matters,
+corresponding as it were to what I have said before about
+the inexactness of geometrical intuition. I believe that the
+more or less close relation of any applied science to mathematics
+might be characterized by the degree of exactness attained,
+or attainable, in its numerical results. Indeed, a rough classification
+of these sciences could be based simply on the number
+of significant figures averaged in each. Astronomy (and some
+branches of physics) would here take the first rank; the number
+%% -----File: 057.png---Folio 47-------
+of significant figures attained may here be placed as high as
+seven, and functions higher than the elementary transcendental
+functions can be used to advantage. Chemistry would probably
+be found at the other end of the scale, since in this science
+rarely more than two or three significant figures can be relied
+upon. Geometrical drawing, with perhaps $3$~to $4$~figures, would
+rank between these extremes; and so we might go on.
+
+The ordinary mathematical treatment of any applied science
+substitutes exact axioms for the approximate results of experience,
+and deduces from these axioms the rigid mathematical
+conclusions. In applying this method it must not be forgotten
+that mathematical developments transcending the limit of exactness
+of the science are of no practical value. It follows that a
+large portion of abstract mathematics remains without finding
+any practical application, the amount of mathematics that can
+be usefully employed in any science being in proportion to the
+degree of accuracy attained in the science. Thus, while the
+astronomer can put to good use a wide range of mathematical
+theory, the chemist is only just beginning to apply the first
+derivative, \ie\ the rate of change at which certain processes are
+going on; for second derivatives he does not seem to have
+found any use as yet.
+
+As examples of extensive mathematical theories that do not
+exist for applied science, I may mention the distinction between
+the commensurable and incommensurable, the investigations on
+the convergency of Fourier's series, the theory of non-analytical
+functions,~etc. It seems to me, therefore, that Kirchhoff makes
+a mistake when he says in his \textit{Spectral-Analyse} that absorption
+takes place only when there is \emph{exact} coincidence between the
+wave-lengths. I side with Stokes, who says that absorption
+takes place \emph{in the vicinity} of such coincidence. Similarly, when
+the astronomer says that the periods of two planets must be
+exactly commensurable to admit the possibility of a collision,
+%% -----File: 058.png---Folio 48-------
+this holds only abstractly, for their mathematical centres; and it
+must be remembered that such things as the period, the mass,
+etc., of a planet cannot be exactly defined, and are changing all
+the time. Indeed, we have no way of ascertaining whether
+two astronomical magnitudes are incommensurable or not; we
+can only inquire whether their ratio can be expressed approximately
+by two \emph{small} integers. The statement sometimes made
+that there exist only analytic functions in nature is in my
+opinion absurd. All we can say is that we restrict ourselves
+to analytic, and even only to simple analytic, functions because
+they afford a sufficient degree of approximation. Indeed, we
+have the theorem (of Weierstrass) that any continuous function
+can be approximated to, with any required degree of accuracy,
+by an analytic function. Thus if $\phi(x)$ be our continuous function,
+and $\delta$~a small quantity representing the given limit of
+exactness (the width of the strip that we substitute for the
+curve), it is always possible to determine an \emph{analytic} function~$f(x)$
+such that
+\[
+\phi(x) = f(x) + \epsilon, \quad\text{where}\quad |\epsilon| < |\delta|,
+\]
+within the given limits.
+
+All this suggests the question whether it would not be possible
+to create a, let us say, \emph{abridged} system of mathematics
+adapted to the needs of the applied sciences, without passing
+through the whole realm of abstract mathematics. Such a
+system would have to include, for example, the researches of
+Gauss on the accuracy of astronomical calculations, or the more
+recent and highly interesting investigations of Tchebycheff on
+interpolation. The problem, while perhaps not impossible, seems
+difficult of solution, mainly on account of the somewhat vague
+and indefinite character of the questions arising.
+
+I hope that what I have here said concerning the use of
+mathematics in the applied sciences will not be interpreted
+%% -----File: 059.png---Folio 49-------
+as in any way prejudicial to the cultivation of abstract mathematics
+as a pure science. Apart from the fact that pure
+mathematics cannot be supplanted by anything else as a means
+for developing the purely logical powers of the mind, there
+must be considered here as elsewhere the necessity of the
+presence of a few individuals in each country developed in a
+far higher degree than the rest, for the purpose of keeping
+up and gradually raising the \emph{general} standard. Even a slight
+raising of the general level can be accomplished only when
+some few minds have progressed far ahead of the average.
+
+Moreover, the ``abridged'' system of mathematics referred
+to above is not yet in existence, and we must for the present
+deal with the material at hand and try to make the best of it.
+
+Now, just here a practical difficulty presents itself in the
+teaching of mathematics, let us say of the elements of the
+differential and integral calculus. The teacher is confronted
+with the problem of harmonizing two opposite and almost contradictory
+requirements. On the one hand, he has to consider
+the limited and as yet undeveloped intellectual grasp of his
+students and the fact that most of them study mathematics
+mainly with a view to the practical applications; on the other,
+his conscientiousness as a teacher and man of science would
+seem to compel him to detract in nowise from perfect mathematical
+rigour and therefore to introduce from the beginning
+all the refinements and niceties of modern abstract mathematics.
+In recent years the university instruction, at least in
+Europe, has been tending more and more in the latter direction;
+and the same tendencies will necessarily manifest themselves
+in this country in the course of time. The second
+edition of the \textit{Cours d'analyse} of Camille Jordan may be
+regarded as an example of this extreme refinement in laying
+the foundations of the infinitesimal calculus. To place a work
+of this character in the hands of a beginner must necessarily
+%% -----File: 060.png---Folio 50-------
+have the effect that at the beginning a large part of the subject
+will remain unintelligible, and that, at a later stage, the
+student will not have gained the power of making use of
+the principles in the simple cases occurring in the applied
+sciences.
+
+It is my opinion that in teaching it is not only admissible,
+but absolutely necessary, to be less abstract at the start, to
+have constant regard to the applications, and to refer to the
+refinements only gradually as the student becomes able to
+understand them. This is, of course, nothing but a universal
+pedagogical principle to be observed in all mathematical
+instruction.
+
+Among recent German works I may recommend for the use
+of beginners, for instance, Kiepert's new and revised edition of
+Stegemann's text-book;\footnote
+ {\textit{Grundriss der Differential- und Integral-Rechnung}, 6te~Auflage, herausgegeben
+ von~Kiepert, Hannover, Helwing, 1892.}
+this work seems to combine simplicity
+and clearness with sufficient mathematical rigour. On
+the other hand, it is a matter of course that for more advanced
+students, especially for professional mathematicians, the study
+of works like that of Jordan is quite indispensable.
+
+I am led to these remarks by the consciousness of a growing
+danger in the higher educational system of Germany,---the
+danger of a separation between abstract mathematical science
+and its scientific and technical applications. Such separation
+could only be deplored; for it would necessarily be followed by
+shallowness on the side of the applied sciences, and by isolation
+on the part of pure mathematics.
+%% -----File: 061.png---Folio 51-------
+
+\Lecture[Transcendency of the Numbers $e$ and $\pi$.]
+{VII.}{The Transcendency of the
+Numbers $e$ and $\pi$.}
+
+\Date{(September 4, 1893.)}
+
+\First{Last} Saturday we discussed inexact mathematics; to-day we
+shall speak of the most exact branch of mathematical science.
+
+It has been shown by G.~Cantor that there are two kinds
+of infinite manifoldnesses: (\textit{a})~\emph{countable} (\emph{abzählbare}) manifoldnesses,
+whose quantities can be numbered or enumerated so that
+to each quantity a definite place can be assigned in the system;
+and (\textit{b})~\emph{non-countable} manifoldnesses, for which this is not possible.
+To the former group belong not only the rational numbers,
+but also the so-called \emph{algebraic} numbers, \ie\ all numbers defined
+by an algebraic equation,
+\[
+a + a_{1}x + a_{2}x^{2} + \cdots + a_{n}x^{n} = 0
+\]
+with integral coefficients ($n$~being of course a positive integer).
+As an example of a non-countable manifoldness I may mention
+the totality of all numbers contained in a \emph{continuum}, such as
+that formed by the points of the segment of a straight line.
+Such a continuum contains not only the rational and algebraic
+numbers, but also the so-called transcendental numbers. The
+actual existence of transcendental numbers which thus naturally
+follows from Cantor's theory of manifoldnesses had been proved
+before, from considerations of a different order, by Liouville.
+With this, however, is not yet given any means for deciding
+whether any particular number is transcendental or not. But
+%% -----File: 062.png---Folio 52-------
+during the last twenty years it has been established that the
+two fundamental numbers $e$ and~$\pi$ are really transcendental.
+It is my object to-day to give you a clear idea of the very
+simple proof recently given by Hilbert for the transcendency of
+these two numbers.
+
+%[** TN: Journal titles in next two footnotes (inconsistently) italicized in original]
+The history of this problem is short. Twenty years ago,
+Hermite\footnote
+ {Comptes rendus, Vol.~77 (1873), p.~18,~etc.}
+first established the transcendency of~$e$; \ie\ he
+showed, by somewhat complicated methods, that the number~$e$
+cannot be the root of an algebraic equation with integral
+coefficients. Nine years later, Lindemann,\footnote
+ {Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~20 (1882), p.~213.}
+taking the developments
+of Hermite as his point of departure, succeeded in
+proving the transcendency of~$\pi$. Lindemann's work was
+verified soon after by Weierstrass.
+
+The proof that $\pi$~is a transcendental number will forever
+mark an epoch in mathematical science. It gives the final
+answer to the problem of squaring the circle and settles this
+vexed question once for all. This problem requires to derive
+the number~$\pi$ by a finite number of elementary geometrical
+processes, \ie\ with the use of the ruler and compasses alone.
+As a straight line and a circle, or two circles, have only two
+intersections, these processes, or any finite combination of
+them, can be expressed algebraically in a comparatively simple
+form, so that a solution of the problem of squaring the circle
+would mean that $\pi$~can be expressed as the root of an algebraic
+equation of a comparatively simple kind, viz.\ one that is solvable
+by square roots. Lindemann's proof shows that $\pi$~is not the
+root of any algebraic equation.
+
+The proof of the transcendency of~$\pi$ will hardly diminish the
+number of circle-squarers, however; for this class of people has
+always shown an absolute distrust of mathematicians and a
+%% -----File: 063.png---Folio 53-------
+contempt for mathematics that cannot be overcome by any
+amount of demonstration. But Hilbert's simple proof will
+surely be appreciated by all those who take interest in the
+establishment of mathematical truths of fundamental importance.
+This demonstration, which includes the case of the
+number~$e$ as well as that of~$\pi$, was published quite recently
+in the \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten}.\footnote
+ {1893, No.~2, p.~113.}
+Immediately after\footnote
+ {\textit{Ib}., No.~4.}
+Hurwitz
+published a proof for the transcendency of~$e$ based on still
+more elementary principles; and finally, Gordan\footnote
+ {Comptes rendus,\DPnote{** TN: Ital. in original} 1893, p.~1040.}
+gave a further
+simplification. All three of these papers will be reprinted
+in the next \textit{Heft} of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}.\footnote
+ {Vol.~43 (1894), pp.~216--224.}
+The problem has
+thus been reduced to such simple terms that the proofs for
+the transcendency of $e$ and~$\pi$ should henceforth be introduced
+into university teaching everywhere.
+
+Hilbert's demonstration is based on two propositions. One
+of these simply asserts the transcendency of~$e$, \emph{\ie\ the impossibility
+of an equation of the form}
+\[
+a + a_{1}e + a_{2}e^{2} + \cdots + a_{n}e^{n} = 0,
+\Tag{(1)}
+\]
+where $a$,~$a_{1}$, $a_{2}$,~$\dots$~$a_{n}$ are integral numbers. This is the original
+proposition of Hermite. To prove the transcendency of~$\pi$,
+another proposition (originally due to Lindemann) is required,
+which asserts \emph{the impossibility of an equation of the form}
+\[
+a + e^{\beta_{1}} + e^{\beta_{2}} + \cdots + e^{\beta_{n}} = 0,
+\Tag{(2)}
+\]
+where $a$~is an integer, and the exponents are algebraic numbers,
+viz.\ the roots of an algebraic equation
+\[
+b\beta^{m} + b_{1}\beta^{m-1} + b_{2}\beta^{m-2} + \cdots + b_{m} = 0,
+\]
+$b$,~$b_{1}$, $b_{2}$,~$\dots~b_{m}$ being integers.
+%% -----File: 064.png---Folio 54-------
+
+It will be noticed that the latter proposition really includes
+the former as a special case; for it is of course possible that
+the~$\beta$'s are rational integral numbers, and whenever some of the
+roots of the equation for~$\beta$ are equal, the corresponding terms
+in the equation~\Eq{(2)} will combine into a single term of the form~$a_{k}e^{\beta_{k}}$.
+The former proposition is therefore introduced only for
+the sake of simplicity.
+
+The central idea of the proof of the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(1)}
+consists in introducing for the quantities $1 : e : e^{2} : \dots : e^{n}$, in
+which the equation is homogeneous, proportional quantities
+\[
+I_{0} + \epsilon_{0} : I_{1} + \epsilon_{1} : I_{2} + \epsilon _{2} : \dots : I_{n} + \epsilon_{n},
+\]
+selected so that each consists of an integer~$I$ and a very small
+fraction~$\epsilon$. The equation then assumes the form
+\[
+(aI_{0} + a_{1}I_{1} + \cdots + a_{n}I_{n}) + (a\epsilon_{0} + a_{1}\epsilon_{1} +\cdots + a_{n}\epsilon_{n}) = 0,
+\Tag{(3)}
+\]
+and it can be shown that the $I$'s and~$\epsilon$'s can always be so
+selected as to make the quantity in the first parenthesis, which
+is of course integral, different from zero, while the quantity in
+the second parenthesis becomes a proper fraction. Now, as
+the sum of an integer and a proper fraction cannot be equal
+to zero, the equation~\Eq{(1)} is proved to be impossible.
+
+So much for the general idea of Hilbert's proof. It will be
+seen that the main difficulty lies in the proper determination
+of the integers~$I$ and the fractions~$\epsilon$. For this purpose Hilbert
+makes use of a definite integral suggested by the investigations
+of Hermite, viz.\ the integral
+\[
+J = \int_{0}^{\infty} z^\rho \bigl[(z - 1) \cdots (z - n)\bigr]^{\rho+1} e^{-z}\,dz,
+\]
+where $\rho$~is an integer to be determined afterwards. Multiplying
+equation~\Eq{(1)} term for term by this integral and dividing
+by~$\rho!$, this equation can evidently be put into the form
+%% -----File: 065.png---Folio 55-------
+\begin{multline*}
+\left(a \frac{\int_{0}^{\infty}}{\rho!}
+ + a_{1}e \frac{\int_{1}^{\infty}}{\rho!}
+ + a_{2}e^{2}\frac{\int_{2}^{\infty}}{\rho!} + \cdots
+ + a_{n}e^{n}\frac{\int_{n}^{\infty}}{\rho!}\right)\\
+ + \left(a_{1}e \frac{\int_{0}^{1}}{\rho!}
+ + a_{2}e^{2}\frac{\int_{0}^{2}}{\rho!} + \cdots
+ + a_{n}e^{n}\frac{\int_{0}^{n}}{\rho!}\right) = 0,
+\end{multline*}
+or designating for shortness the quantities in the two parentheses
+by $P_{1}$~and~$P_{2}$, respectively,
+\[
+P_{1} + P_{2} = 0.
+\]
+
+Now it can be proved that the coefficients of $a$,~$a_{1}$, $a_{2}$,~$\dots~a_{n}$
+in~$P_{1}$ are all integers, that $\rho$~can be so selected as to make
+$P_{1}$~different from zero, and that at the same time $\rho$~can be
+taken so large as to make $P_{2}$ as small as we please. Thus,
+equation~\Eq{(1)} will be reduced to the impossible form~\Eq{(3)}.
+
+We proceed to prove these properties of $P_{1}$~and~$P_{2}$. The
+integral~$J$ is readily seen to be an integer divisible by~$\rho!$,
+owing to the well-known relation $\int_{0}^{\infty}z^{\rho}e^{-z}\,dz = \rho!$. Similarly,
+by substituting $z = z' + 1$, $z = z' + 2$,~$\dots$ $z = z' + n$, it can be shown
+that $e \int_{1}^{\infty}$, $e^{2} \int_{2}^{\infty}$,~$\dots \DPtypo{e}{e^{n}}\int_{n}^{\infty}$ are integers divisible by~$(\rho + 1)!$. It
+follows that $P_{1}$~is an integer, viz.\
+\[
+P_{1}\equiv ±a(n!)^{\rho + 1} \pmod[sq]{\rho + 1}.
+\]
+If, therefore, $\rho$~be selected so as to make the right-hand member
+of this congruence not divisible by~$\rho + 1$, the whole expression~$P_{1}$
+is different from zero.
+
+As regards the condition that $P_{2}$ should be made as small
+as we please, it can evidently be fulfilled by selecting a sufficiently
+large value for~$\rho$; this is of course consistent with
+the condition of making $J$ not divisible by~$\rho + 1$. For by the
+theorem of mean values (\textit{Mittelwertsatz}) the integrals can be
+replaced by powers of constant quantities with $\rho$ in the exponent;
+%% -----File: 066.png---Folio 56-------
+and the rate of increase of a power is, for sufficiently
+large values of~$\rho$, always smaller than that of the factorial which
+occurs in the denominator.
+
+The proof of the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(2)} proceeds on
+precisely analogous lines. Instead of the integral~$J$ we have
+now to use the integral
+\[
+J' = b^{m(\rho + 1)}\int_{0}^{\infty} z^{\rho}\bigl[(z - \beta_{1})(z - \beta_{2}) \cdots (z - \beta_{m})\bigr]^{\rho + 1}e^{-z}\,dz,
+\]
+the $\beta$'s being the roots of the algebraic equation
+\[
+b\beta^{m} + b_{1}\beta^{m-1} + \cdots + b_{m} = 0.
+\]
+This integral is decomposed as follows:
+\[
+\int_{0}^{\infty} = \int_{0}^{\beta} + \int_{\beta}^{\infty},
+\]
+where of course the path of integration must be properly
+determined for complex values of~$\beta$. For the details I must
+refer you to Hilbert's paper.
+
+Assuming the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(2)}, the transcendency
+of~$\pi$
+%[Illustration: Fig.~12.]
+\WFigure{2in}{066}
+follows easily from the following considerations, originally
+given by Lindemann. We notice
+first, as a consequence of our theorem,
+that, \emph{with the exception of
+the point $x = 0$, $y = 1$, the exponential
+curve $y = e^{x}$ has no algebraic
+point}, \ie\ no point both of whose
+co-ordinates are algebraic numbers.
+In other words, however
+densely the plane may be covered
+with algebraic points, the exponential curve (\Fig{12}) manages
+to pass along the plane without meeting them, the single point~$(0, 1)$
+excepted. This curious result can be deduced as follows
+from the impossibility of equation~\Eq{(2)}. Let~$y$ be any algebraic
+%% -----File: 067.png---Folio 57-------
+quantity, \ie\ a root of any algebraic equation, and let $y_{1}$,~$y_{2}$,~$\dots$
+be the other roots of the same equation; let a similar notation
+be used for~$x$. Then, if the exponential curve have any algebraic
+point~$(x, y)$, (besides $x = 0$, $y = 1$), the equation
+\[
+\left.
+\begin{array}{@{}l@{}l@{}l@{}l@{}}
+ (y - e^{x}) & (y_{1} - e^{x}) & (y_{2} - e^{x}) &\cdots \\
+ (y - e^{x_{1}}) & (y_{1} - e^{x_{1}}) & (y_{2} - e^{x_{1}}) &\cdots \\
+ (y - e^{x_{2}}) & (y_{1} - e^{x_{2}}) & (y_{2} - e^{x_{2}}) &\cdots \\
+\hdotsfor[3]{4}
+\end{array}
+\right\} = 0
+\]
+must evidently be fulfilled. But this equation, when multiplied
+out, has the form of equation~\Eq{(2)}, which has been shown to be
+impossible.
+
+As second step we have only to apply the well-known identity
+\[
+\DPtypo{1}{-1} = e^{i\pi},
+\]
+which is a special case of $y = e^{x}$. Since in this identity $y = \DPtypo{1}{-1}$ is
+algebraic, $x = i\pi$ must be transcendental.
+%% -----File: 068.png---Folio 58-------
+
+\Lecture{VIII.}{Ideal Numbers.}
+
+\Date{(September 5, 1893.)}
+
+\First{The} theory of numbers is commonly regarded as something
+exceedingly difficult and abstruse, and as having hardly any
+connection with the other branches of mathematical science.
+This view is no doubt due largely to the method of treatment
+adopted in such works as those of Kummer, Kronecker, Dedekind,
+and others who have, in the past, most contributed to the
+advancement of this science. Thus Kummer is reported as
+having spoken of the theory of numbers as the only \emph{pure}
+branch of mathematics not yet sullied by contact with the
+applications.
+
+Recent investigations, however, have made it clear that there
+exists a very intimate correlation between the theory of numbers
+and other departments of mathematics, not excluding
+geometry.
+
+As an example I may mention the theory of the reduction
+of binary quadratic forms as treated in the \textit{Elliptische Modulfunctionen}.
+An extension of this method to higher dimensions
+is possible without serious difficulties. Another example you
+will remember from the paper by Minkowski, \textit{Ueber Eigenschaften
+von ganzen Zahlen, die durch räumliche Anschauung
+erschlossen sind}, which I had the pleasure of presenting to
+you in abstract at the Congress of Mathematics. Here geometry
+is used directly for the development of new arithmetical
+ideas.
+%% -----File: 069.png---Folio 59-------
+
+To-day I wish to speak on the \emph{composition of binary algebraic
+forms}, a subject first discussed by Gauss in his \textit{Disquisitiones
+arithmeticæ}\footnote
+ {In the 5th~section; see Gauss's \textit{Werke}, Vol.~I, p.~239.}
+and of Kummer's corresponding theory of \emph{ideal
+numbers}. Both these subjects have always been considered as
+very abstruse, although Dirichlet has somewhat simplified the
+treatment of Gauss. I trust you will find that the geometrical
+considerations by means of which I shall treat these questions
+introduce so high a degree of simplicity and clearness that for
+those not familiar with the older treatment it must be difficult
+to realize why the subject should ever have been regarded as
+so very intricate. These considerations were indicated by
+myself in the \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten} for January,~1893; and
+at the beginning of the summer semester of the present year
+I treated them in more extended form in a course of lectures. I
+have since learned that similar ideas were proposed by Poincaré
+in~1881; but I have not yet had sufficient leisure to make a
+comparison of his work with my own.
+
+I write a binary quadratic form as follows:
+\[
+f = ax^{2} + bxy + cy^{2},
+\]
+\ie\ without the factor~$2$ in the second term; some advantages
+of this notation were recently pointed out by H.~Weber, in
+the \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten}, 1892--93. The quantities $a$,~$b$,~$c$, $x$,~$y$
+are here of course all assumed to be integers.
+
+It is to be noticed that in the theory of numbers a common
+factor of the coefficients $a$,~$b$,~$c$ cannot be introduced or omitted
+arbitrarily, as in projective geometry; in other words, we are
+concerned with the form, not with an equation. Hence we
+make the supposition that the coefficients $a$,~$b$,~$c$ have no
+common factor; a form of this character is called a \emph{primitive
+form}.
+%% -----File: 070.png---Folio 60-------
+
+As regards the discriminant
+\[
+D = b^{2} - 4ac,
+\]
+we shall assume that it has no quadratic divisor (and hence
+cannot be itself a square), and that it is different from zero.
+Thus $D$~is either $\equiv 0$ or $\equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. Of the two cases,
+\[
+D < 0\quad \text{and} \quad D > 0,
+\]
+which have to be considered separately, I select the former as
+being more simple. Both cases were treated in my lectures
+referred to before.
+
+The following elementary geometrical interpretation of the
+binary quadratic form was given by Gauss, who was much
+inclined to using geometrical considerations in all branches of
+mathematics. Construct a parallelogram (\Fig{13}) with two
+%[Illustration: Fig.~13.]
+\Figure[4in]{070}
+adjacent sides equal to $\sqrt{a}$,~$\sqrt{c}$, respectively, and the included
+angle~$\phi$ such that $\cos\phi = \dfrac{b}{2\sqrt{ac}}$. As $b^{2} - 4ac < 0$, $a$~and~$c$ have
+necessarily the same sign; we here assume that $a$~and~$c$ are
+%% -----File: 071.png---Folio 61-------
+both positive; the case when they are both negative can
+readily be treated by changing the signs throughout. Next
+produce the sides of the parallelogram indefinitely, and draw
+parallels so as to cover the whole plane by a network of
+equal parallelograms. I shall call this a \emph{line-lattice} (\emph{Parallelgitter}).
+
+We now select any one of the intersections, or \emph{vertices}, as
+origin~$O$, and denote every other vertex by the symbol~$(x, y)$,
+$x$~being the number of sides~$\sqrt{a}$, $y$~that of sides~$\sqrt{c}$, which
+must be traversed in passing from~$O$ to~$(x, y)$. Then every
+value that the form~$f$ takes for integral values of~$x$,~$y$ evidently
+represents the square of the distance of the point~$(x, y)$ from~$O$.
+Thus the lattice gives a complete geometrical representation
+of the binary quadratic form. The discriminant~$D$ has
+also a simple geometrical interpretation, the area of each parallelogram
+being $= \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-D}$.
+
+Now, in the theory of numbers, two forms
+\[
+f = ax^{2} + bxy + cy^{2}\quad\text{and}\quad f' = a'x'^{2} + b'x'y' + c'y'^{2}
+\]
+are regarded as equivalent if one can be derived from the other
+by a linear substitution whose determinant is~$1$, say
+\[
+x' = \alpha x + \beta y,\quad
+y' = \gamma x + \delta y,
+\]
+where $\alpha \delta - \beta \gamma = 1$, $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$, $\delta$ being integers. All forms equivalent
+to a given one are said to compose a \emph{class} of quadratic
+forms; these forms have all the same discriminant. What
+corresponds to this equivalence in our geometrical representation
+will readily appear if we fix our attention on the vertices
+only (\Fig{14}); we then obtain what I propose to call a \emph{point-lattice}
+(\emph{Punktgitter}). Such a network of points can be connected
+in various ways by two sets of parallel lines; \ie\ the
+point-lattice represents an infinite number of line-lattices. Now
+it results from an elementary investigation that the point-lattice
+%% -----File: 072.png---Folio 62-------
+is the geometrical image of the \emph{class} of binary quadratic
+forms, the infinite number of line-lattices contained in
+the point-lattice corresponding exactly to the infinite number
+of binary forms contained in the class.
+
+%[Illustration: Fig.~14.]
+\Figure[4in]{072}
+It is further known from the theory of numbers that to
+every value of~$D$ belongs only a finite number of classes;
+hence to every~$D$ will correspond a finite number of point-lattices,
+which we shall afterwards consider together.
+
+Among the different classes belonging to the same value of~$D$,
+there is one class of particular importance, which I call the
+\emph{principal class}. It is defined as containing the form
+\[
+x^{2} - \tfrac{1}{4} Dy^{2}
+\]
+when $D \equiv 0\pmod{4}$, and the form
+\[
+x^{2} + xy + \tfrac{1}{4}(1 - D)y^{2},
+\]
+when $D \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. It is easy to see that the corresponding
+lattices are very simple. When $D \equiv 0 \pmod{4}$, the principal
+lattice is rectangular, the sides of the elementary parallelogram
+%% -----File: 073.png---Folio 63-------
+being~$1$ and~$\sqrt{-\frac{1}{4}D}$. For $D \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$, the parallelogram
+becomes a rhombus. For the sake of simplicity, I shall here
+consider only the former case.
+
+Let us now define complex numbers in connection with the
+principal lattice of the rectangular type (\Fig{15}). The point~$(x, y)$
+%[Illustration: Fig.~15.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{073}
+of the lattice will represent simply the complex number
+\[
+x + \sqrt{-\tfrac{1}{4}D} · y;
+\]
+such numbers we shall call \emph{principal numbers}.
+
+In any system of numbers the laws of multiplication are of
+prime importance. For our principal numbers it is easy to
+prove that the product of any two of them always gives a
+principal number; \emph{\ie\ the system of principal numbers is, for
+multiplication, complete in itself}.
+
+We proceed next to the consideration of lattices of discriminant~$D$
+that do not belong to the principal class; let us call
+them \emph{secondary lattices} (\emph{Nebengitter}). Before investigating the
+laws of multiplication of the corresponding numbers, I must
+call attention to the fact that there is one feature of arbitrariness
+in our representation that has not yet been taken into
+account; this is the \emph{orientation} of the lattice, which may be
+regarded as given by the angles, $\psi$~and~$\chi$, made by the sides
+%% -----File: 074.png---Folio 64-------
+$\sqrt{a}$,~$\sqrt{c}$, respectively, with some fixed initial line (\Fig{16}).
+For the angle~$\phi$ of the parallelogram we have evidently $\phi = \chi - \psi$.
+The point~$(x, y)$ of the lattice will thus give the complex number
+\[
+e^{i\psi} \left[\sqrt{a} · x + \frac{-b + \sqrt{D}}{2\sqrt{a}} · y\right]
+ = e^{i\psi} · \sqrt{a} · x + e^{i\chi} · \sqrt{c} · y,
+\]
+which we call a \emph{secondary number}. The definition of a secondary
+number is therefore indeterminate as long as $\psi$~or~$\chi$ is not
+fixed.
+
+Now, by determining~$\psi$ properly for every secondary point-lattice,
+it is always possible to bring about the important result
+%[Illustration: Fig.~16.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{074}
+that \emph{the product of any two complex numbers of all our lattices
+taken together will again be a complex number of the system},
+so that the totality of these complex numbers forms, likewise,
+for multiplication, a complete system.
+
+Moreover, the multiplication combines the lattices in a
+definite way; thus, if any number belonging to the lattice~$L_{1}$
+be multiplied into any number of the lattice~$L_{2}$, we always obtain
+a number belonging to a definite lattice~$L_{3}$.
+
+These properties will be seen to correspond exactly to the
+characteristic properties of Gauss's \emph{composition of algebraic
+forms}. For Gauss's law merely asserts that the product of
+%% -----File: 075.png---Folio 65-------
+two ordinary numbers that can be represented by two primitive
+forms $f_{1}$,~$f_{2}$ of discriminant~$D$ is always representable by a
+definite primitive form~$f_{3}$ of discriminant~$D$. This law is
+included in the theorem just stated, inasmuch as the values of
+$\sqrt{f_{1}}$,~$\sqrt{f_{2}}$,~$\sqrt{f_{3}}$ represent the distances of the points in the
+lattices from the origin. At the same time we notice that
+Gauss's law is not exactly equivalent to our theorem, since
+in the multiplication of our complex numbers, not only the
+distances are multiplied, but the angles~$\phi$ are added.
+
+It is not impossible that Gauss himself made use of similar
+considerations in deducing his law, which, taken apart from this
+geometrical illustration, bears such an abstruse character.
+
+It now remains to explain what relation these investigations
+have to the ideal numbers of Kummer. This involves the
+question as to the division of our complex numbers and their
+resolution into primes.
+
+In the ordinary theory of real numbers, every number can
+be resolved into primes in only one way. Does this fundamental
+law hold for our complex numbers? In answering this question
+we must distinguish between the system formed by the totality
+of all our complex numbers and the system of principal numbers
+alone. For the former system the answer is: yes, every complex
+number can be decomposed into complex primes in only
+one way. We shall not stop to consider the proof which is
+directly contained in the ordinary theory of binary quadratic
+forms. But if we proceed to the consideration of the system
+of principal numbers alone, the matter is different. There
+are cases when a principal number can be decomposed in
+more than one way into prime factors, \ie\ principal numbers
+not decomposable into principal factors. Thus it may happen
+that we have $m_{1}m_{2} = n_{1}n_{2}$; $m_{1}$,~$m_{2}$, $n_{1}$,~$n_{2}$ being principal primes.
+The reason is,\DPnote{** [sic]} that these principal numbers are no longer primes
+%% -----File: 076.png---Folio 66-------
+if we adjoin the secondary numbers, but are decomposable as
+follows:
+\begin{alignat*}{2}
+m_{1}& = \alpha · \beta, \quad & m_{2} &= \gamma · \delta, \\
+n_{1}& = \alpha · \gamma, \quad & n_{2} &= \beta · \delta,
+\end{alignat*}
+$\alpha$,~$\beta$,~$\gamma$,~$\delta$ being primes in the enlarged system. \emph{In investigating
+the laws of division it is therefore not convenient to consider the
+principal system by itself; it is best to introduce the secondary
+systems.} Kummer, in studying these questions, had originally
+at his disposal only the principal system; and noticing the
+imperfection of the resulting laws of division, he introduced
+by definition his \emph{ideal} numbers so as to re-establish the ordinary
+laws of division. These ideal numbers of Kummer are thus
+seen to be nothing but abstract representatives of our secondary
+numbers. The whole difficulty encountered by every one when
+first attacking the study of Kummer's ideal numbers is therefore
+merely a result of his mode of presentation. By introducing
+from the beginning the secondary numbers by the side of
+the principal numbers, no difficulty arises at all.
+
+It is true that we have here spoken only of complex numbers
+containing square roots, while the researches of Kummer himself
+and of his followers, Kronecker and Dedekind, embrace all
+possible algebraic numbers. But our methods are of universal
+application; it is only necessary to construct lattices in spaces
+of higher dimensions. It would carry us too far to enter into
+details.
+%% -----File: 077.png---Folio 67-------
+
+\Lecture[Solution of Higher Algebraic Equations.]
+{IX.}{The Solution of Higher Algebraic
+Equations.}
+
+\Date{(September 6, 1893.)}
+
+\First{Formerly} the ``solution of an algebraic equation'' used to
+mean its solution by radicals. All equations whose solutions
+cannot be expressed by radicals were classed simply as \emph{insoluble},
+although it is well known that the Galois groups belonging to
+such equations may be very different in character. Even at
+the present time such ideas are still sometimes found prevailing;
+and yet, ever since the year~1858, a very different point of
+view should have been adopted. This is the year in which
+Hermite and Kronecker, together with Brioschi, found the
+solution of the equation of the fifth degree, at least in its
+fundamental ideas.
+
+This solution of the quintic equation is often referred to as
+a ``solution by elliptic functions''; but this expression is not
+accurate, at least not as a counterpart to the ``solution by
+radicals.'' Indeed, the elliptic functions enter into the solution
+of the equation of the fifth degree, as logarithms might be said
+to enter into the solution of an equation by radicals, because
+the radicals can be computed by means of logarithms. \emph{The
+solution of an equation will, \emph{in the present lecture}, be regarded
+as consisting in its reduction to certain algebraic normal equations.}
+That the irrationalities involved in the latter can, in
+the case of the quintic equation, be computed by means of
+tables of elliptic functions (provided that the proper tables of
+%% -----File: 078.png---Folio 68-------
+the corresponding class of elliptic functions were available)
+is an additional point interesting enough in itself, but not to
+be considered by us to-day.
+
+I have simplified the solution of the quintic, and think that
+I have reduced it to the simplest form, by introducing the
+\emph{icosahedron equation} as the proper normal equation.\footnote
+ {See my work \textit{Vorlesungen über das Ikosaeder und die Auflösung der Gleichungen
+ vom fünften Grade}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1884.}
+In other
+words, the icosahedron equation determines the typical irrationality
+to which the solution of the equation of the fifth
+degree can be reduced. This method is capable of being so
+generalized as to embrace a whole theory of the solution of
+higher algebraic equations; and to this I wish to devote the
+present lecture.
+
+It may be well to state that I speak here of equations with
+coefficients that are not fixed numerically; the equations are
+considered from the point of view of the theory of functions,
+the coefficients corresponding to the independent variables.
+
+In saying that an equation is solvable by radicals we mean
+that it is reducible by algebraic processes to so-called pure
+equations,
+\[
+\eta^{n} = z,
+\]
+where $z$~is a known quantity; then only the new question
+arises, how $\eta = \sqrt[n]{z}$ can be computed. Let us compare from
+this point of view the icosahedron equation with the pure
+equation.
+
+The icosahedron equation is the following equation of the
+$60$th~degree:
+\[
+\frac{H^{3}(\eta)}{1728f^{5}(\eta)} = z,
+\]
+where $H$~is a numerical expression of the~$20$th, $f$~one of the
+$12$th~degree, while $z$~is a known quantity. For the actual
+%% -----File: 079.png---Folio 69-------
+forms of $H$ and~$f$ as well as other details I refer you to the
+\textit{Vorlesungen über das Ikosaeder}; I wish here only to point
+out the characteristic properties of this equation.
+
+(1)~Let $\eta$ be any one of the roots; then the $60$~roots can
+all be expressed as linear functions of~$\eta$, with known coefficients,
+such as for instance,
+\[
+\eta,\quad \frac{1}{\eta},\quad \epsilon \eta,\quad
+\frac{(\epsilon - \epsilon^{4})\eta - (\epsilon^{2} - \epsilon^{3})}
+ {(\epsilon^{2} - \epsilon^{3})\eta + (\epsilon - \epsilon^{4})},\quad \text{etc.},
+\]
+where $\epsilon = e^{\frac{2i\pi}{5}}$. These $60$~quantities, then, form a group of $60$~linear
+substitutions.
+%[Illustration: Fig.~17.]
+\Figure{079a}
+
+(2)~Let us next illustrate geometrically the dependence of~$\eta$
+on~$z$ by establishing the conformal representation of the $z$-plane
+on the $\eta$-plane, or rather (by stereographic projection) on a
+sphere (\Fig{17}).
+%[Illustration: Fig.~18.]
+\WFigure{1.625in}{079b}
+The triangles corresponding
+to the upper (shaded) half of
+the $z$-plane are the alternate (shaded)
+triangles on the sphere determined by
+inscribing a regular icosahedron and
+dividing each of the $20$~triangles so
+obtained into six equal and symmetrical
+triangles by drawing the altitudes (\Fig{18}).
+This conformal representation on the sphere assigns to
+every root a definite region, and is therefore equivalent to a
+%% -----File: 080.png---Folio 70-------
+perfect separation of the $60$~roots. On the other hand, it corresponds
+in its regular shape to the $60$~linear substitutions
+indicated above.
+
+(3)~If, by putting $\eta = y_{1}/y_{2}$, we make the $60$~expressions
+of the roots homogeneous, the different values of the quantities~$y$
+will all be of the form
+\[
+\alpha y_{1} + \beta y_{2},\quad \gamma y_{1} + \delta y_{2},
+\]
+and therefore satisfy a linear differential equation of the
+second order
+\[
+y'' + py' + q\DPtypo{}{y} = 0,
+\]
+$p$~and~$q$ being definite rational functions of~$z$. It is, of course,
+always possible to express every root of an equation by means
+of a power series. In our case we reduce the calculation of~$\eta$
+to that of $y_{1}$ and~$y_{2}$, and try to find series for these quantities.
+Since these series must satisfy our differential equation
+of the second order, the law of the series is comparatively
+simple, any term being expressible by means of the two
+preceding terms.
+
+(4)~Finally, as mentioned before, the calculation of the
+roots may be abbreviated by the use of elliptic functions,
+provided tables of such elliptic functions be computed beforehand.
+
+Let us now see what corresponds to each of these four
+points in the case of the \emph{pure} equation $\eta^{n} = z$. The results are
+well known:
+
+(1)~All the $n$~roots can be expressed as linear functions
+of any one of them,~$\eta$:
+\[
+\eta,\quad \epsilon \eta,\quad \epsilon^{2} \eta, \quad\dots\quad \epsilon^{n-1} \eta,
+\]
+$\epsilon$~being a primitive $n$th~root of unity.
+%% -----File: 081.png---Folio 71-------
+
+(2)~The conformal representation (\Fig{19}) gives the division
+of the sphere into $2n$~equal lunes whose great circles all pass
+through the same two points.
+
+%[Illustration: Fig.~19.]
+\Figure{081}
+(3)~There is a differential equation of the first order in~$\eta$,
+viz.,
+\[
+nz · \eta' - \eta = 0,
+\]
+from which simple series can be derived for the purposes of
+actual calculation of the roots.
+
+(4)~If these series should be inconvenient, logarithms can be
+used for computation.
+
+The analogy, you will perceive, is complete. The principal
+difference between the two cases lies in the fact that, for the
+pure equation, the linear substitutions involve but one quantity,
+while for the quintic equation we have a group of \emph{binary} linear
+substitutions. The same distinction finds expression in the
+differential equations, the one for the pure equation being of
+the first order, while that for the quintic is of the second order.
+
+Some remarks may be added concerning the reduction of the
+general equation of the fifth degree,
+\[
+f_{5}(x) = 0,
+\]
+to the icosahedron equation. This reduction is possible because
+the Galois group of our quintic equation (the square root of the
+discriminant having been adjoined) is isomorphic with the group
+%% -----File: 082.png---Folio 72-------
+of the $60$~linear substitutions of the icosahedron equation. This
+possibility of the reduction does not, of course, imply an answer
+to the question, what operations are needed to effect the reduction.
+The second part of my \textit{Vorlesungen über das Ikosaeder} is
+devoted to the latter question. It is found that the reduction
+cannot be performed rationally, but requires the introduction of
+a square root. The irrationality thus introduced is, however, an
+irrationality of a particular kind (a so-called \emph{accessory} irrationality);
+for it must be such as not to reduce the Galois group of
+the equation.
+
+I proceed now to consider the general problem of an analogous
+treatment of higher equations as first given by me in the
+\textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~15 (1879).\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Auflösung gewisser Gleichungen vom siebenten und achten Grade},
+ pp.~251--282.}
+I must remark, first of all,
+that for an accurate exposition it would be necessary to distinguish
+throughout between the homogeneous and projective
+formulations (in the latter case, only the ratios of the homogeneous
+variables are considered). Here it may be allowed to
+disregard this distinction.
+
+%[** TN: Variables inside italics are upright in the original]
+Let us consider the very general problem: \emph{a finite group of
+homogeneous linear substitutions of $n$~variables being given, to
+calculate the values of the $n$~variables from the invariants of the
+group.}
+
+This problem evidently contains the problem of solving an
+algebraic equation of any Galois group. For in this case all
+rational functions of the roots are known that remain unchanged
+by certain \emph{permutations} of the roots, and permutation is, of
+course, a simple case of \emph{homogeneous linear transformation}.
+
+Now I propose a general formulation for the treatment of
+these different problems as follows: \emph{among the problems having
+isomorphic groups we consider as the simplest the one that has the}
+%% -----File: 083.png---Folio 73-------
+\emph{least number of variables, and call this the normal problem. This
+%[** TN: Wording below from 1911 reprint]
+problem must be considered as solvable by series of \DPtypo{any}{some} kind.
+The question is to reduce the other isomorphic problems to the
+normal problem.}
+
+This formulation, then, contains what I propose as a general
+solution of algebraic equations, \ie\ a reduction of the equations
+to the isomorphic problem with a minimum number of
+variables.
+
+The reduction of the equation of the fifth degree to the
+icosahedron problem is evidently contained in this as a special
+case, the minimum number of variables being two.
+
+In conclusion I add a brief account showing how far the general
+problem has been treated for equations of higher degrees.
+
+In the first place, I must here refer to the discussion by
+myself\footnote
+ {Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~15 (1879), pp.~251--282.}
+and Gordan\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Gleichungen siebenten Grades mit einer Gruppe von $168$~Substitutionen},
+ Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~20 (1882), pp.~515--530, and Vol.~25 (1885), pp.~459--521.}
+of those equations of the seventh degree
+that have a Galois group of $168$~substitutions. The minimum
+number of variables is here equal to three, the ternary group
+being the same group of $168$~linear substitutions that has since
+been discussed with full details in Vol.~I. of the \textit{Elliptische
+Modulfunctionen}. While I have confined myself to an exposition
+of the general idea, Gordan has actually performed the
+reduction of the equation of the seventh degree to the ternary
+problem. This is no doubt a splendid piece of work; it is
+only to be deplored that Gordan here, as elsewhere, has disdained
+to give his leading ideas apart from the complicated
+array of formulæ.
+
+Next, I must mention a paper published in Vol.~28 (1887) of
+the \textit{Math.\ Annalen},\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der allgemeinen Gleichungen sechsten und siebenten Grades}, pp.~499--532.}
+where I have shown that for the \emph{general}
+%% -----File: 084.png---Folio 74-------
+equations of the sixth and seventh degrees the minimum number
+of the normal problem is four, and how the reduction can
+be effected.
+
+Finally, in a letter addressed to Camille Jordan\footnote
+ {Journal de mathématiques, année 1888, p.~169.}
+I pointed
+out the possibility of reducing the equation of the $27$th~degree,
+which occurs in the theory of cubic surfaces, to a normal problem
+containing likewise four variables. This reduction has
+ultimately been performed in a very simple way by Burkhardt\footnote
+ {\textit{Untersuchungen aus dem Gebiete der hyperelliptischen Modulfunctionen. Dritter
+ Theil}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~41 (1893), pp.~313--343.}
+while all quaternary groups here mentioned have been considered
+more closely by Maschke.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die quaternäre, endliche, lineare Substitutionsgruppe der Borchardt'schen
+ Moduln}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~30 (1887), pp.~496--515; \textit{Aufstellung des vollen Formensystems
+ einer quaternären Gruppe von $51840$~linearen Substitutionen}, ib., Vol.~33
+ (1889), pp.~317--344; \textit{Ueber eine merkwürdige Configuration gerader Linien im
+ Raume}, ib., Vol.~36 (1890), pp.~190--215.}
+
+This is the whole account of what has been accomplished;
+but it is clear that further progress can be made on the same
+lines without serious difficulty.
+
+A first problem I wish to propose is as follows. In recent
+years many groups of permutations of $6, 7, 8, 9, \dots$ letters have
+been made known. The problem would be to determine in
+each case the minimum number of variables with which isomorphic
+groups of linear substitutions can be formed.
+
+Secondly, I want to call your particular attention to the case
+of the general equation of the eighth degree. I have not been
+able in this case to find a material simplification, so that it
+would seem as if the equation of the eighth degree were its
+own normal problem. It would no doubt be interesting to
+obtain certainty on this point.
+%% -----File: 085.png---Folio 75-------
+
+\Lecture[Hyperelliptic and Abelian Functions.]
+{X.}{On Some Recent Advances in
+Hyperelliptic and Abelian Functions.}
+
+\Date{(September 7, 1893.)}
+
+\First{The} subject of hyperelliptic and Abelian functions is of such
+vast dimensions that it would be impossible to embrace it in
+its whole extent in one lecture. I wish to speak only of the
+mutual correlation that has been established between this
+subject on the one hand, and the theory of invariants, projective
+geometry, and the theory of groups, on the other. Thus in
+particular I must omit all mention of the recent attempts to
+bring arithmetic to bear on these questions. As regards the
+theory of invariants and projective geometry, their introduction
+in this domain must be considered as a realization and farther
+extension of the programme of Clebsch. But the additional
+idea of groups was necessary for achieving this extension.
+What I mean by establishing a mutual correlation between
+these various branches will be best understood if I explain it
+on the more familiar example of the \emph{elliptic functions}.
+
+To begin with the older method, we have the fundamental
+elliptic functions in the Jacobian form
+\[
+\sin\am\left(v, \frac{K'}{K}\right),\quad
+\cos\am\left(v, \frac{K'}{K}\right),\quad
+\Delta\am\left(v, \frac{K'}{K}\right),
+\]
+as depending on two arguments. These are treated in many
+works, sometimes more from the geometrical point of view of
+Riemann, sometimes more from the analytical standpoint of
+%% -----File: 086.png---Folio 76-------
+Weierstrass. I may here mention the first edition of the work
+of Briot and Bouquet, and of German works those by Königsberger
+and by Thomae.
+
+The impulse for a new treatment is due to Weierstrass. He
+introduced, as is well known, three homogeneous arguments,
+$u$,~$\omega_{1}$,~$\omega_{2}$, instead of the two Jacobian arguments. This was
+a necessary preliminary to establishing the connection with
+the theory of linear substitutions. Let us consider the discontinuous
+ternary group of linear substitutions,
+\begin{alignat*}{3}
+u' &= u + & m_{1} \omega_{1} &+& m_{2} \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{1}' &= &\alpha \omega_{1} &+& \beta \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{2}' &= &\gamma \omega_{1} &+& \delta \omega_{2}&,
+\end{alignat*}
+where $\alpha$,~$\beta$,~$\gamma$,~$\delta$ are integers whose determinant $\alpha \delta - \beta \gamma = 1$,
+while $m_{1}$,~$m_{2}$ are any integers whatever. The fundamental
+functions of Weierstrass's theory,
+\[
+p (u, \omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),\quad
+p'(u, \omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),\quad
+g_{2}(\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),\quad
+g_{3}(\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}),
+\]
+are nothing but the complete system of invariants of that group.
+It appears, moreover, that $g_{2}$,~$g_{3}$ are also the ordinary (Cayleyan)
+invariants of the binary biquadratic form $f_{4}(x_{1}, x_{2})$, on
+which depends the integral of the first kind
+\[
+\int\frac{x_{1}\,dx_{2} - x_{2}\,dx_{1}}{\sqrt{f_{4}(x_{1}, x_{2})}}.
+\]
+This significant feature that the transcendental invariants turn
+out to be at the same time invariants of the algebraic irrationality
+corresponding to the transcendental theory will hold in
+all higher cases.
+
+As a next step in the theory of elliptic functions we have to
+mention the introduction by Clebsch of the systematic consideration
+of algebraic curves of deficiency~$1$. He considered
+in particular the plane curve of the third order~($C_{3}$) and the
+%% -----File: 087.png---Folio 77-------
+first species of quartic curves~($C_{4}^{1}$) in space, and showed how
+convenient it is for the derivation of numerous geometrical
+propositions to regard the elliptic integrals as taken along these
+curves. The theory of elliptic functions is thus broadened by
+bringing to bear upon it the ideas of modern projective geometry.
+
+By combining and generalizing these considerations, I was
+led to the formulation of a very general programme which may
+be stated as follows (see \textit{Vorlesungen über die Theorie der elliptischen
+Modulfunctionen}, Vol.~II.).
+
+Beginning with the discontinuous group mentioned before
+\begin{alignat*}{3}
+u' &= u + & m_{1} \omega_{1} &+& m_{2} \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{1}'&= &\alpha \omega_{1} &+& \beta \omega_{2}&, \\
+\omega_{2}'&= &\gamma \omega_{1} &+& \delta \omega_{2}&,
+\end{alignat*}
+our first task is to construct all its sub-groups. Among these
+the simplest and most useful are those that I have called
+\emph{congruence sub-groups}; they are obtained by putting
+\[
+\left.
+\begin{alignedat}{2}
+m_{1} &\equiv 0,\quad & m_{2} &\equiv 0, \\
+\alpha &\equiv 1,\quad & \beta &\equiv 0, \\
+\gamma &\equiv 0,\quad &\delta &\equiv 1,
+\end{alignedat}
+\right\} \pmod{n}.
+\]
+
+The second problem is to construct the invariants of all
+these groups and the relations between them. Leaving out
+of consideration all sub-groups except these congruence sub-groups,
+we have still attained a very considerable enlargement
+of the theory of elliptic functions. According to the value
+assigned to the number~$n$, I distinguish different \emph{stages} (\emph{Stufen})
+of the problem. It will be noticed that Weierstrass's theory
+corresponds to the first stage ($n = 1$), while Jacobi's answers,
+generally speaking, to the second ($n = 2$); the higher stages
+have not been considered before in a systematic way.
+
+Thirdly, for the purpose of geometrical illustration, I apply
+Clebsch's idea of the algebraic curve. I begin by introducing
+%% -----File: 088.png---Folio 78-------
+the ordinary square root of the binary form which requires the
+axis of~$x$ to be covered twice; \ie\ we have to use a~$C_{2}$ in an~$S_{1}$.
+I next proceed to the general cubic curve of the plane
+($C_{3}$ in an~$S_{2}$), to the quartic curve in space of three dimensions
+($C_{4}$ in an~$S_{3}$), and generally to the elliptic curve~$C_{n+1}$ in an~$S_{n}$.
+These are what I call the normal elliptic curves; they serve best
+to illustrate any algebraic relations between elliptic functions.
+
+I may notice, by the way, that the treatment here proposed
+is strictly followed in the \textit{Elliptische Modulfunctionen}, except
+that there the quantity~$u$ is of course assumed to be zero, since
+this is precisely what characterizes the modular functions. I
+hope some time to be able to treat the whole theory of elliptic
+functions (\ie\ with $u$~different from zero) according to this
+programme.
+
+The successful extension of this programme to the theory of
+hyperelliptic and Abelian functions is the best proof of its
+being a real step in advance. I have therefore devoted my
+efforts for many years to this extension; and in laying before
+you an account of what has been accomplished in this rather
+special field, I hope to attract your attention to various lines of
+research along which new work can be spent to advantage.
+
+As regards the \emph{hyperelliptic functions}, we may premise as a
+general definition that they are functions of \emph{two} variables $u_{1}$,~$u_{2}$,
+with \emph{four} periods (while the elliptic functions have \emph{one} variable~$u$,
+and \emph{two} periods). Without attempting to give an
+historical account of the development of the theory of hyperelliptic
+functions, I turn at once to the researches that mark
+a progress along the lines specified above, beginning with the
+geometric application of these functions to surfaces in a space
+of any number of dimensions.
+
+Here we have first the investigation by Rohn of Kummer's
+surface, the well-known surface of the fourth order, with $16$~conical
+%% -----File: 089.png---Folio 79-------
+points. I have myself given a report on this work in
+the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~27 (1886).\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber Configurationen, welche der Kummer'schen Fläche zugleich eingeschrieben
+ und umgeschrieben sind}, pp.~106--142.}
+If every mathematician is
+struck by the beauty and simplicity of the relations developed
+in the corresponding cases of the elliptic functions (the~$C_{3}$ in
+the plane,~etc.), the remarkable configurations inscribed and
+circumscribed to the Kummer surface that have here been
+developed by Rohn and myself, should not fail to elicit interest.
+
+Further, I have to mention an extensive memoir by Reichardt,
+published in~1886, in the \textit{Acta Leopoldina}, where the connection
+between hyperelliptic functions and Kummer's surface is
+summarized in a convenient and comprehensive form, as an
+introduction to this branch. The starting-point of the investigation
+is taken in the theory of line-complexes of the second
+degree.
+
+Quite recently the French mathematicians have turned their
+attention to the general question of the representation of surfaces
+by means of hyperelliptic functions, and a long memoir by
+Humbert on this subject will be found in the last volume of the
+\textit{Journal de Mathématiques.}\footnote
+ {\textit{Théorie générale des surfaces hyperelliptiques}, année~1893, pp.~29--170.}
+
+I turn now to the abstract theory of hyperelliptic functions.
+It is well known that Göpel and Rosenhain established that
+theory in~1847 in a manner closely corresponding to the Jacobian
+theory of elliptic functions, the integrals
+\[
+u_{1} = \int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{f_{6}(x)}},\quad
+u_{2} = \int \frac{x\,dx}{\sqrt{f_{6}(x)}}
+\]
+taking the place of the single elliptic integral~$u$. Here, then,
+the question arises: what is the relation of the hyperelliptic
+functions to the invariants of the binary form of the sixth order
+$f_{6}(x_{1}, x_{2})$? In the investigation of this question by myself and
+%% -----File: 090.png---Folio 80-------
+Burkhardt, published in Vol.~27 (1886)\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber hyperelliptische Sigmafunctionen}, pp.~431--464.}
+and Vol.~32 (1888)\footnote
+ {pp.~351--380 and 381--442.}
+of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, we found that the decompositions of
+the form~$f_{6}$ into two factors of lower order, $f_{6} = \phi_{1} \psi_{5} = \phi_{3} \psi_{3}$,
+had to be considered. These being, of course, irrational decompositions,
+the corresponding invariants are irrational; and a
+study of the theory of such invariants became necessary.
+
+But another new step had to be taken. The hyperelliptic
+integrals involve the form~$f_{6}$ under the square root,~$\sqrt{f_{6}(x_{1}, x_{2})}$.
+The corresponding Riemann surface has, therefore, two leaves
+connected at six points; and the problem arises of considering
+binary forms of $x_{1}$,~$x_{2}$ on such a Riemann surface, just as ordinarily
+functions of $x$~alone are considered thereon. It can be
+shown that there exists a particular kind of forms called \emph{primeforms},
+strictly analogous to the determinant $x_{1}y_{2} - x_{2}y_{1}$ in the
+ordinary complex plane. The primeform on the two-leaved
+Riemann surface, like this determinant in the ordinary theory,
+has the property of vanishing only when the points $(x_{1}, x_{2})$ and
+$(y_{1}, y_{2})$ co-incide (on the same leaf). Moreover, the primeform
+does not become infinite anywhere. The analogy to the determinant
+$x_{1}y_{2} - x_{2}y_{1}$ fails only in so far as the primeform is no
+longer an algebraic but a transcendental form. Still, all algebraic
+forms on the surface can be decomposed into prime
+factors. Moreover, these primeforms give the natural means
+for the construction of the $\theta$-functions. As an intermediate
+step we have here functions called by me $\sigma$-functions in analogy
+to the $\sigma$-functions of Weierstrass's elliptic theory. In the
+papers referred to (\textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vols.~27,~32) all these considerations
+are, of course, given for the general case of hyperelliptic
+functions, the irrationality being $\sqrt{f_{2p+2}(x_{1}, x_{2})}$, where
+$f_{2p+2}$ is a binary form of the order~$2p+2$.
+%% -----File: 091.png---Folio 81-------
+
+Having thus established the connection between the ordinary
+theory of hyperelliptic functions of $p = 2$ and the invariants of
+the binary sextic, I undertook the systematic development of
+what I have called, in the case of elliptic functions, the \emph{Stufentheorie}.
+The lectures I gave on this subject in~1887--88
+have been developed very fully by Burkhardt in the \textit{Math.\
+Annalen}, Vol.~35 (1890).\footnote
+ {\textit{Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Systematik der hyperelliptischen Functionen~I.
+ Ordnung}, pp.~198--296.}
+
+As regards the first stage, which, owing to the connection
+with the theory of \emph{rational} invariants and covariants, requires
+very complicated calculations, the Italian mathematician, Pascal,
+has made much progress (\textit{Annali di matematica}). In this
+connection I must refer to the paper by Bolza\footnote
+ {\textit{Darstellung der rationalen ganzen Invarianten der Binärform sechsten Grades
+ durch die Nullwerthe der zugehörigen $\theta$-Functionen}, pp.~478--495.}
+in \textit{Math.\
+Annalen}, Vol.~30 (1887), where the question is discussed in
+how far it is possible to represent the rational invariants of
+the sextic by means of the zero values of the $\theta$-functions.
+
+For higher stages, in particular stage three, Burkhardt has
+given very valuable developments in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~36
+(1890), p.~371; Vol.~38 (1891), p.~161; Vol.~41 (1893), p.~313.
+He considers, however, only the hyperelliptic modular functions
+($u_{1}$~and~$u_{2}$ being assumed to be zero). The final aim, which
+Burkhardt seems to have attained, although a large amount
+of numerical calculation remains to be filled in, consists here
+in establishing the so-called \emph{multiplier-equation} for transformations
+of the third order. The equation is of the $40$th~degree;
+and Burkhardt has given the general law for the formation
+of the coefficients.
+
+I invite you to compare his treatment with that of Krause
+in his book \textit{Die Transformation der hyperelliptischen Functionen
+erster Ordnung}, Leipzig, Teubner, 1886. His investigations,
+%% -----File: 092.png---Folio 82-------
+based on the general relations between $\theta$-functions, may
+go farther; but they are carried out from purely formal
+point of view, without reference to the theories of invariants,
+of groups, or other allied topics.
+
+So much as regards hyperelliptic functions. I now proceed
+to report briefly on the corresponding advances made in the
+theory of Abelian functions. I give merely a list of papers;
+they may be classed under three heads:
+
+(1)~A \emph{preliminary} question relates to the invariant representation
+of the integral of the third kind on algebraic curves of
+higher deficiency. Pick\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~29 (1887), pp.~259--271.}
+has considered this problem for plane
+curves having no singular points. On the other hand, White,
+in his dissertation,\footnote
+ {\textit{Abel'sche Integrale auf singularitätenfreien, einfach überdeckten, vollständigen
+ Schnittcurven eines beliebig ausgedehnten Raumes}, Halle, 1891, pp.~43--128.}
+briefly reported in \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~36
+(1890), p.~597, and printed in full in the \textit{Acta Leopoldina}, has
+treated such curves in space as are the complete intersection
+of two surfaces and have no singular point. We may here
+also notice the researches of Pick and Osgood\footnote
+ {Osgood, \textit{Zur Theorie der zum algebraischen Gebilde $y^{m} = R(x)$ gehörigen
+ Abel'schen Functionen}, Göttingen, 1890, 8vo, 61~pp.}
+on the so-called
+binomial integrals.
+
+(2)~An exposition of the general theory of forms on Riemann
+surfaces of any kind, in particular a definition of the
+primeform belonging to each surface, was given by myself
+in Vol.~36 (1890) of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}.\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Theorie der Abel'schen Functionen}, pp.~1--83.}
+I may add that
+during the last year this subject was taken up anew and
+farther developed by Dr.~Ritter; see \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten}
+%[** TN: Correct volume number from 1911 reprint]
+for~1893, and \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~\DPtypo{43}{44}. Dr.~Ritter considers
+the algebraic forms as special cases of more general forms, the
+\emph{multiplicative forms}, and thus takes a real step in advance.
+%% -----File: 093.png---Folio 83-------
+
+(3)~Finally, the particular case $p = 3$ has been studied on the
+basis of our programme in various directions. The normal
+curve for this case is well known to be the plane quartic~$C_{4}$
+whose geometric properties have been investigated by Hesse
+and others. I found (\textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~36) that these
+geometrical results, though obtained from an entirely different
+point of view, corresponded exactly to the needs of the Abelian
+problem, and actually enabled me to define clearly the $64$
+$\theta$-functions with the aid of the~$C_{4}$. Here, as elsewhere, there
+seems to reign a certain pre-established harmony in the development
+of mathematics, what is required in one line of research
+being supplied by another line, so that there appears to be
+a logical necessity in this, independent of our individual
+disposition.
+
+In this case, also, I have introduced $\sigma$-functions in the place
+of the $\theta$-functions. The coefficients are irrational covariants
+just as in the case $p = 2$. These $\sigma$-series have been studied at
+great length by Pascal in the \textit{Annali di Matematica}. These
+investigations bear, of course, a close relation to those of
+Frobenius and Schottky, which only the lack of time prevents
+me from quoting in detail.
+
+Finally, the recent investigations of an Austrian mathematician,
+\emph{Wirtinger}, must here be mentioned. First, Wirtinger has
+established for $p = 3$ the analogue to the Kummer surface; this
+is a manifoldness of three dimensions and the $24$th~order in an~$S_{7}$;
+see \textit{Göttinger Nachrichten} for~1889, and \textit{Wiener Monatshefte},
+1890. Though apparently rather complicated, this manifoldness
+has some very elegant properties; thus it is transformed into
+itself by $64$~collineations and $64$~reciprocations. Next, in
+Vol.~40 (1892), of the \textit{Math.\ Annalen},\footnote
+ {\textit{Untersuchungen über Abel'sche Functionen vom Geschlechte}~3, pp.~261--312.}
+Wirtinger has discussed
+the Abelian functions on the assumption that only
+%% -----File: 094.png---Folio 84-------
+\emph{rational} invariants and covariants of the curve of the fourth
+order are to be considered; this corresponds to the ``first
+stage'' with $p = 3$. The investigation is full of new and
+fruitful ideas.
+
+In concluding, I wish to say that, for the cases $p = 2$ and
+$p = 3$, while much still remains to be done, the fundamental
+difficulties have been overcome. The great problem to be
+attacked next is that of $p = 4$, where the normal curve is of the
+sixth order in space. It is to be hoped that renewed efforts
+will result in overcoming all remaining difficulties. Another
+promising problem presents itself in the field of $\theta$-functions,
+when the general $\theta$-series are taken as starting-point, and not
+the algebraic curve. An enormous number of formulæ have
+there been developed by analysts, and the problem would be
+to connect these formulæ with clear geometrical conceptions
+of the various algebraic configurations. I emphasize these
+special problems because the Abelian functions have always
+been regarded as one of the most interesting achievements
+of modern mathematics, so that every advance we make in
+this theory gives a standard by which we can measure our
+own efficiency.
+%% -----File: 095.png---Folio 85-------
+
+\Lecture{XI.}{The Most Recent Researches
+in Non-Euclidean Geometry.}
+
+\Date{(September 8, 1893.)}
+
+\First{My} remarks to-day will be confined to the progress of non-Euclidean
+geometry during the last few years. Before reporting
+on these latest developments, however, I must briefly
+summarize what may be regarded as the general state of
+opinion among mathematicians in this field. There are three
+points of view from which non-Euclidean geometry has been
+considered.
+
+(1)~First we have the point of view of elementary geometry, of
+which Lobachevsky and Bolyai themselves are representatives.
+Both begin with simple geometrical constructions, proceeding
+just like Euclid, except that they substitute another axiom for
+the axiom of parallels. Thus they build up a system of non-Euclidean
+geometry in which the length of the line is infinite,
+and the ``measure of curvature'' (to anticipate a term not used
+by them) is negative. It is, of course, possible by a similar
+process to obtain the geometry with a positive measure of
+curvature, first suggested by Riemann; it is only necessary
+to formulate the axioms so as to make the length of a line
+finite, whereby the existence of parallels is made impossible.
+
+(2)~From the point of view of projective geometry, we begin
+by establishing the system of projective geometry in the sense
+of von~Staudt, introducing projective co-ordinates, so that
+straight lines and planes are given by \emph{linear} equations. Cayley's
+%% -----File: 096.png---Folio 86-------
+theory of projective measurement leads then directly to
+the three possible cases of non-Euclidean geometry: hyperbolic,
+parabolic, and elliptic, according as the measure of
+curvature~$k$ is $< 0$,~$= 0$, or~$> 0$. It is here, of course, essential
+to adopt the system of von~Staudt and not that of
+Steiner, since the latter defines the anharmonic ratio by
+means of distances of points, and not by pure projective
+constructions.
+
+(3)~Finally, we have the point of view of Riemann and Helmholtz.
+Riemann starts with the idea of the element of distance~$ds$,
+which he assumes to be expressible in the form
+\[
+ds = \sqrt{\sum a_{ik}\,dx_{i}\,dx_{k}}.
+\]
+Helmholtz, in trying to find a reason for this assumption, considers
+the motions of a rigid body in space, and derives from
+these the necessity of giving to~$ds$ the form indicated. On the
+other hand, Riemann introduces the fundamental notion of the
+\emph{measure of curvature of space}.
+
+The idea of a measure of curvature for the case of two
+variables, \ie\ for a surface in a three-dimensional space, is due
+to Gauss, who showed that this is an intrinsic characteristic of
+the surface quite independent of the higher space in which the
+surface happens to be situated. This point has given rise to a
+misunderstanding on the part of many non-Euclidean writers.
+When Riemann attributes to his space of three dimensions a
+measure of curvature~$k$, he only wants to say that there exists
+an invariant of the ``form'' $\sum{a_{ik}\,dx_{i}\,dx_{k}}$; he does not mean to
+imply that the three-dimensional space necessarily exists as a
+curved space in a space of four dimensions. Similarly, the
+illustration of a space of constant positive measure of curvature
+by the familiar example of the sphere is somewhat misleading.
+Owing to the fact that on the sphere the geodesic lines (great
+circles) issuing from any point all meet again in another definite
+%% -----File: 097.png---Folio 87-------
+point, antipodal, so to speak, to the original point, the existence
+of such an antipodal point has sometimes been regarded as a
+necessary consequence of the assumption of a constant positive
+curvature. The projective theory of non-Euclidean space shows
+immediately that the existence of an antipodal point, though
+compatible with the nature of an elliptic space, is not necessary,
+but that two geodesic lines in such a space may intersect in
+one point if at all.\footnote
+ {This theory has also been developed by Newcomb, in the \textit{Journal für reine
+ und angewandte Mathematik}, Vol.~83 (1877), pp.~293--299.}
+
+I call attention to these details in order to show that there
+is some advantage in adopting the second of the three points of
+view characterized above, although the third is at least equally
+important. Indeed, our ideas of space come to us through the
+senses of vision and motion, the ``optical properties'' of space
+forming one source, while the ``mechanical properties'' form
+another; the former corresponds in a general way to the projective
+properties, the latter to those discussed by Helmholtz.
+
+As mentioned before, from the point of view of projective
+geometry, von~Staudt's system should be adopted as the basis.
+It might be argued that von~Staudt practically assumes the
+axiom of parallels (in postulating a one-to-one correspondence
+between a pencil of lines and a row of points). But I have
+shown in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die sogenannte Nicht-Euklidische Geometrie}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~6
+ (1873), pp.~112--145.}
+how this apparent difficulty can
+be overcome by restricting all constructions of von~Staudt to a
+limited portion of space.
+
+I now proceed to give an account of the most recent researches
+in non-Euclidean geometry made by Lie and myself.
+Lie published a brief paper on the subject in the \textit{Berichte} of
+the Saxon Academy~(1886), and a more extensive exposition
+of his views in the same \textit{Berichte} for 1890 and~1891. These
+%% -----File: 098.png---Folio 88-------
+papers contain an application of Lie's theory of continuous
+groups to the problem formulated by Helmholtz. I have the
+more pleasure in placing before you the results of Lie's investigations
+as they are not taken into due account in my paper
+on the foundations of projective geometry in Vol.~37 of the
+\textit{Math.\ Annalen} (1890),\footnote
+ {\textit{Zur Nicht-Euklidischen Geometrie}, pp.~544--572.}
+nor in my (lithographed) lectures on
+non-Euclidean geometry delivered at Göttingen in~1889--90; the
+last two papers of Lie appeared too late to be considered, while
+the first had somehow escaped my memory.
+
+I must begin by stating the problem of Helmholtz in modern
+terminology. The motions of three-dimensional space are~$\infty^{6}$,
+and form a group, say~$G_{6}$. This group is known to have an
+invariant for any two points $p$,~$p'$, viz.\ the distance $\Omega (p, p')$
+of these points. But the form of this invariant (and generally
+the form of the group) in terms of the co-ordinates $x_{1}$,~$x_{2}$,~$x_{3}$,
+$y_{1}$,~$y_{2}$,~$y_{3}$ of the points is not known \textit{a~priori}. The question
+arises whether the group of motions is fully characterized by
+these two properties so that none but the Euclidean and the
+two non-Euclidean systems of geometry are possible.
+
+For illustration Helmholtz made use of the analogous case
+in two dimensions. Here we have a group of $\infty^{3}$~motions;
+the distance is again an invariant; and yet it is possible to
+construct a group not belonging to any one of our three
+systems, as follows.
+
+Let $z$ be a complex variable; the substitution characterizing
+the group of Euclidean geometry can be written in the well-known
+form
+\[
+z' = e^{i\phi}z + m + in = (\cos\phi + i \sin\phi)z + m + in.
+\]
+Now modifying this expression by introducing a complex
+number in the exponent,
+\[
+z' = e^{(a+i)\phi}z + m + in = e^{a\phi} (\cos\phi + i \sin\phi)z + m + in,
+\]
+%% -----File: 099.png---Folio 89-------
+we obtain a group of transformations by which a point (in
+the simple case $m = 0$, $n = 0$) would not move about the origin
+in a circle, but in a logarithmic spiral; and yet this is a group~$G_{3}$
+with three variable parameters $m$,~$n$,~$\phi$, having an invariant
+for every two points, just like the original group. Helmholtz
+concludes, therefore, that a new condition, that of \emph{monodromy},
+must be added to determine our group completely.
+
+I now proceed to the work of Lie. First as to the results:
+Lie has confirmed those of Helmholtz with the single exception
+that in space of three dimensions the axiom of monodromy is
+not needed, but that the groups to be considered are fully
+determined by the other axioms. As regards the proofs, however,
+Lie has shown that the considerations of Helmholtz must
+be supplemented. The matter is this. In keeping one point of
+space fixed, our $G_{6}$ will be reduced to a~$G_{3}$. Now Helmholtz
+inquires how the differentials of the lines issuing from the fixed
+point are transformed by this~$G_{3}$. For this purpose he writes
+down the formulæ
+\begin{align*}
+dx_{1}' &= a_{11}\, dx_{1} + a_{12}\, dx_{2} + a_{13}\, dx_{3}, \\
+dx_{2}' &= a_{21}\, dx_{1} + a_{22}\, dx_{2} + a_{23}\, dx_{3}, \\
+dx_{3}' &= a_{31}\, dx_{1} + a_{32}\, dx_{2} + a_{33}\, dx_{3},
+\end{align*}
+and considers the coefficients $a_{11}$, $a_{12}$,~$\dots$ $a_{33}$ as depending on
+three variable parameters. But Lie remarks that this is not
+sufficiently general. The linear equations given above represent
+only the first terms of power series, and the possibility
+must be considered that the three parameters of the group may
+not all be involved in the linear terms. In order to treat all
+possible cases, the general developments of Lie's theory of
+groups must be applied, and this is just what Lie does.
+
+Let me now say a few words on my own recent researches in
+non-Euclidean geometry which will be found in a paper published
+in the \textit{Math.\ Annalen}, Vol.~37 (1890), p.~544. Their
+%% -----File: 100.png---Folio 90-------
+result is that our ideas as to non-Euclidean space are still very
+incomplete. Indeed, all the researches of Riemann, Helmholtz,
+Lie, consider only a portion of space surrounding the origin;
+they establish the existence of analytic laws in the vicinity of
+that point. Now this space can of course be continued, and
+the question is to see what kind of connection of space may
+result from this continuation. It is found that there are different
+possibilities, each of the three geometries giving rise
+to a series of subdivisions.
+
+To understand better what is meant by these varieties of
+connection, let us compare the geometry on a sphere with that
+in the sheaf of lines formed by the diameters of the sphere.
+Considering each diameter as an infinite line or ray passing
+through the centre (not a half-ray issuing from the centre), to
+each line of the sheaf there will correspond two points on the
+sphere, viz.\ the two points of intersection of the line with the
+sphere. We have, therefore, a one-to-two correspondence
+between the lines of the sheaf and the points of the sphere.
+Let us now take a small area on the sphere; it is clear that
+the distance of two points contained in this area is equal to
+the angle of the corresponding lines of the sheaf. Thus the
+geometry of points on the sphere and the geometry of lines in
+the sheaf are identical as far as small regions are concerned, both
+corresponding to the assumption of a constant positive measure
+of curvature. A difference appears, however, as soon as we
+consider the whole closed sphere on the one hand and the complete
+sheaf on the other. Let us take, for instance, two geodesic
+lines of the sphere, \ie\ two great circles, which evidently intersect
+in two (diametral) points. The corresponding pencils of
+the sheaf have only \emph{one} straight line in common.
+
+A second example for this distinction occurs in comparing
+the geometry of the Euclidean plane with the geometry on a
+closed cylindrical surface. The latter can be developed in the
+%% -----File: 101.png---Folio 91-------
+usual way into a strip of the plane bounded by two parallel
+lines, as will appear from \Fig{20}, the arrows indicating that
+the opposite points of the edges are coincident on the cylindrical
+surface. We notice at once the difference: while in the
+plane all geodesic lines are infinite, on the cylinder there is
+%[Illustration: Fig.~20.]
+\Figure[2.5in]{101a}
+one geodesic line that is of finite length, and while in the plane
+two geodesic lines always intersect in one point, if at all, on
+the cylinder there may be $\infty$~points of intersection.
+
+This second example was generalized by Clifford in an
+address before the Bradford meeting of the British Association~(1873).
+%[Illustration: Fig. 21.]
+\Figure[2in]{101b}
+In accordance with Clifford's general idea, we
+may define a closed surface by taking a parallelogram out of
+an ordinary plane and making the opposite edges correspond
+point to point as indicated in \Fig{21}. It is not to be
+understood that the opposite edges should be brought to
+%% -----File: 102.png---Folio 92-------
+coincidence by bending the parallelogram (which evidently
+would be impossible without stretching); but only the logical
+convention is made that the opposite points should be considered
+as identical. Here, then, we have a closed manifoldness
+of the connectivity of an anchor-ring, and every one
+will see the great differences that exist here in comparison
+with the Euclidean plane in everything concerning the lengths
+and the intersections of geodesic lines, etc.
+
+It is interesting to consider the $G_{3}$ of Euclidean motions on
+this surface. There is no longer any possibility of moving the
+surface on itself in $\infty^{3}$~ways, the closed surface being considered
+in its totality. But there is no difficulty in moving any
+small area over the closed surface in $\infty^{3}$~ways.
+
+We have thus found, in addition to the Euclidean plane,
+two other forms of surfaces: the strip between parallels and
+Clifford's parallelogram. Similarly we have by the side of
+ordinary Euclidean space three other types with the Euclidean
+element of arc; one of these results from considering a
+parallelepiped.
+
+Here I introduce the axiomatic element. There is no way
+of proving that the whole of space can be moved in itself in
+$\infty^{6}$~ways; all we know is that small portions of space can be
+moved in space in $\infty^{6}$~ways. Hence there exists the possibility
+that our actual space, the measure of curvature being taken as
+zero, may correspond to any one of the four cases.
+
+Carrying out the same considerations for the spaces of constant
+positive measure of curvature, we are led back to the two
+cases of elliptic and spherical geometry mentioned before. If,
+however, the measure of curvature be assumed as a negative
+constant, we obtain an infinite number of cases, corresponding
+exactly to the configurations considered by Poincaré and myself
+in the theory of automorphic functions. This I shall not stop
+to develop here.
+%% -----File: 103.png---Folio 93-------
+
+I may add that Killing has verified this whole theory.\footnote
+ {\textit{Ueber die Clifford-Klein'schen Raumformen}, Math.\ Annalen, Vol.~39 (1891),
+ pp.~257--278.}
+It
+is evident that from this point of view many assertions concerning
+space made by previous writers are no longer correct
+(\textit{e.g.}\ that infinity of space is a consequence of zero curvature),
+so that we are forced to the opinion that our geometrical
+demonstrations have no absolute objective truth, but are true
+only for the present state of our knowledge. These demonstrations
+are always confined within the range of the space-conceptions
+that are familiar to us; and we can never tell
+whether an enlarged conception may not lead to further
+possibilities that would have to be taken into account.
+From this point of view we are led in geometry to a certain
+modesty, such as is always in place in the physical sciences.
+%% -----File: 104.png---Folio 94-------
+
+\Lecture{XII.}{The Study of Mathematics
+at Göttingen.}
+
+\Date{(September 9, 1893.)}
+
+\First{In} this last lecture I should like to make some general
+remarks on the way in which the study of mathematics is
+organized at the university of Göttingen, with particular reference
+to what may be of interest to American students. At the
+same time I desire to give you an opportunity to ask any questions
+that may occur to you as to the broader subject of mathematical
+study at German universities in general. I shall be
+glad to answer such inquiries to the extent of my ability.
+
+It is perhaps inexact to speak of an \emph{organization} of the
+mathematical teaching at Göttingen; you know that \textit{Lern- und
+Lehr-Freiheit} prevail at a German university, so that the organization
+I have in mind consists merely in a voluntary agreement
+among the mathematical professors and instructors. We distinguish
+at Göttingen between a general and a higher course
+in mathematics. The general course is intended for that large
+majority of our students whose intention it is to devote themselves
+to the teaching of mathematics and physics in the higher
+schools (\textit{Gymnasien}, \textit{Realgymnasien}, \textit{Realschulen}), while the
+higher course is designed specially for those whose final aim
+is original investigation.
+
+As regards the former class of students, it is my opinion that
+in Germany (here in America, I presume, the conditions are
+very different) the abstractly theoretical instruction given to
+%% -----File: 105.png---Folio 95-------
+them has been carried too far. It is no doubt true that what
+the university should give the student above all other things
+is the scientific ideal. For this reason even these students
+should push their mathematical studies far beyond the elementary
+branches they may have to teach in the future. But the
+ideal set before them should not be chosen so far distant, and
+so out of connection with their more immediate wants, as to
+make it difficult or impossible for them to perceive the bearing
+that this ideal has on their future work in practical life.
+In other words, the ideal should be such as to fill the future
+teacher with enthusiasm for his life-work, not such as to make
+him look upon this work with contempt as an unworthy
+drudgery.
+
+For this reason we insist that our students of this class, in
+addition to their lectures on pure mathematics, should pursue
+a thorough course in physics, this subject forming an integral
+part of the curriculum of the higher schools. Astronomy is
+also recommended as showing an important application of
+mathematics; and I believe that the technical branches, such
+as applied mechanics, resistance of materials,~etc., would form
+a valuable aid in showing the practical bearing of mathematical
+science. Geometrical drawing and descriptive geometry form
+also a portion of the course. Special exercises in the solution
+of problems, in lecturing,~etc., are arranged in connection with
+the mathematical lectures, so as to bring the students into
+personal contact with the instructors.
+
+I wish, however, to speak here more particularly on the
+higher courses, as these are of more special interest to American
+students. Here specialization is of course necessary.
+Each professor and docent delivers certain lectures specially
+designed for advanced students, in particular for those studying
+for the doctor's degree. Owing to the wide extent of modern
+mathematics, it would be out of the question to cover the whole
+%% -----File: 106.png---Folio 96-------
+field. These lectures are therefore not regularly repeated every
+year; they depend largely on the special line of research that
+happens at the time to engage the attention of the professor.
+In addition to the lectures we have the higher seminaries, whose
+principal object is to guide the student in original investigation
+and give him an opportunity for individual work.
+
+As regards my own higher lectures, I have pursued a certain
+plan in selecting the subjects for different years, my general
+aim being \emph{to gain, in the course of time, a complete view of the
+whole field of modern mathematics, with particular regard to the
+intuitional or} (in the highest sense of the term) \emph{geometrical
+standpoint}. This general tendency you will, I trust, also find
+expressed in this colloquium, in which I have tried to present,
+within certain limits, a general programme of my individual
+work. To carry out this plan in Göttingen, and to bring it to
+the notice of my students, I have, for many years, adopted the
+method of having my higher lectures carefully written out, and,
+in recent years, of having them lithographed, so as to make
+them more readily accessible. These former lectures are at the
+disposal of my hearers for consultation at the mathematical
+reading-room of the university; those that are lithographed can
+be acquired by anybody, and I am much pleased to find them
+so well known here in America.
+
+As another important point, I wish to say that I have always
+regarded my students not merely as hearers or pupils, but as
+collaborators. I want them to take an active part in my own
+researches; and they are therefore particularly welcome if they
+bring with them special knowledge and new ideas, whether
+these be original with them, or derived from some other source,
+from the teachings of other mathematicians. Such men will
+spend their time at Göttingen most profitably to themselves.
+
+I have had the pleasure of seeing many Americans among
+my students, and gladly bear testimony to their great enthusiasm
+%% -----File: 107.png---Folio 97-------
+and energy. Indeed, I do not hesitate to say that, for
+some years, my higher lectures were mainly sustained by students
+whose home is in this country. But I deem it my duty
+to refer here to some difficulties that have occasionally arisen
+in connection with the coming of American students to Göttingen.
+Perhaps a frank statement on my part, at this opportunity,
+will contribute to remove these difficulties in part. What I wish
+to speak of is this. It frequently happens at Göttingen, and
+probably at other German universities as well, that American
+students desire to take the higher courses when their preparation
+is entirely inadequate for such work. A student having
+nothing but an elementary knowledge of the differential and
+integral calculus, usually coupled with hardly a moderate familiarity
+with the German language, makes a decided mistake in
+attempting to attend my advanced lectures. If he comes to Göttingen
+with such a preparation (or, rather, the lack of it), he
+may, of course, enter the more elementary courses offered at our
+university; but this is generally not the object of his coming.
+Would he not do better to spend first a year or two in one of
+the larger American universities? Here he would find more
+readily the transition to specialized studies, and might, at the
+same time, arrive at a clearer judgment of his own mathematical
+ability; this would save him from the severe disappointment
+that might result from his going to Germany.
+
+I trust that these remarks will not be misunderstood. My
+presence here among you is proof enough of the value I attach
+to the coming of American students to Göttingen. It is in
+the interest of those wishing to go there that I speak; and
+for this reason I should be glad to have the widest publicity
+given to what I have said on this point.
+
+Another difficulty lies in the fact that my higher lectures
+have frequently an encyclopedic character, conformably to the
+general tendency of my programme. This is not always just
+%% -----File: 108.png---Folio 98-------
+what is most needful to the American student, whose work
+is naturally directed to gaining the doctor's degree. He will
+need, in addition to what he may derive from my lectures, the
+concentration on a particular subject; and this he will often
+find best with other instructors, at Göttingen or elsewhere.
+I wish to state distinctly that I do not regard it as at all desirable
+that all students should confine their mathematical studies
+to my courses or even to Göttingen. On the contrary, it
+seems to me far preferable that the majority of the students
+should attach themselves to other mathematicians for certain
+special lines of work. My lectures may then serve to form
+the wider background on which these special studies are projected.
+It is in this way, I believe, that my lectures will
+prove of the greatest benefit.
+
+In concluding I wish to thank you for your kind attention,
+and to give expression to the pleasure I have found in meeting
+here at Evanston, so near to Chicago, the great metropolis of
+this commonwealth, a number of enthusiastic devotees of my
+chosen science.
+%% -----File: 109.png---Folio 99-------
+
+\Addendum{The Development of Mathematics}{at the
+German Universities.\protect\footnotemark}
+{By F.~Klein.}
+
+\footnotetext{Translation, with a few slight modifications by the author, of the section \textit{Mathematik}
+ in the work \textit{Die deutschen Universitäten}, Berlin, A.~Asher \&~Co., 1893,
+ prepared by Professor Lexis for the World's Columbian Exposition at Chicago.}
+
+\First{The} eighteenth century laid the firm foundation for the
+development of mathematics in all directions. The universities
+as such, however, did not take a prominent part in this
+work; the \emph{academies} must here be considered of prime importance.
+Nor can any fixed limits of nationality be recognized.
+At the beginning of the period there appears in Germany no
+less a man than \emph{Leibniz}; then follow, among the kindred
+Swiss, the dynasty of the \emph{Bernoullis} and the incomparable
+\emph{Euler}. But the activity of these men, even in its outward
+manifestation, was not confined within narrow geographical
+bounds; to encompass it we must include the Netherlands,
+and in particular Russia, with Germany and Switzerland. On
+the other hand, under Frederick the Great, the most eminent
+French mathematicians, Lagrange, d'Alembert, Maupertuis,
+formed side by side with Euler and Lambert the glory of
+the Berlin Academy. The impulse toward a complete change
+in these conditions came from the French Revolution.
+
+The influence of this great historical event on the development
+of science has manifested itself in two directions.
+On the one hand it has effected a wider separation of nations
+%% -----File: 110.png---Folio 100-------
+with a distinct development of characteristic national qualities.
+Scientific ideas preserve, of course, their universality;
+indeed, international intercourse between scientific men has
+become particularly important for the progress of science;
+but the cultivation and development of scientific thought now
+progress on national bases. The other effect of the French
+Revolution is in the direction of educational methods. The
+decisive event is the foundation of the École polytechnique at
+Paris in~1794. That scientific research and active instruction
+can be directly combined, that lectures alone are not sufficient,
+and must be supplemented by direct personal intercourse
+between the lecturer and his students, that above all it is of
+prime importance to arouse the student's own activity,---these
+are the great principles that owe to this source their recognition
+and acceptance. The example of Paris has been the more
+effective in this direction as it became customary to publish in
+systematic form the lectures delivered at this institution; thus
+arose a series of admirable text-books which remain even now
+the foundation of mathematical study everywhere in Germany.
+Nevertheless, the principal idea kept in view by the founders
+of the Polytechnic School has never taken proper root in the
+German universities. This is the combination of the technical
+with the higher mathematical training. It is true that, primarily,
+this has been a distinct advantage for the unrestricted
+development of theoretical investigation. Our professors, finding
+themselves limited to a small number of students who, as
+future teachers and investigators, would naturally take great
+interest in matters of pure theory, were able to follow the bent
+of their individual predilections with much greater freedom
+than would have been possible otherwise.
+
+But we anticipate our historical account. First of all we
+must characterize the position that Gauss holds in the science
+of this age. Gauss stands in the very front of the new development:
+%% -----File: 111.png---Folio 101-------
+first, by the time of his activity, his publications reaching
+back to the year~1799, and extending throughout the entire
+first half of the nineteenth century; then again, by the wealth of
+new ideas and discoveries that he has brought forward in almost
+every branch of pure and applied mathematics, and which still
+preserve their fruitfulness; finally, by his methods, for Gauss
+was the first to restore that \emph{rigour} of demonstration which we
+admire in the ancients, and which had been forced unduly into
+the background by the exclusive interest of the preceding period
+in \emph{new} developments. And yet I prefer to rank Gauss with
+the great investigators of the eighteenth century, with Euler,
+Lagrange,~etc. He belongs to them by the universality of his
+work, in which no trace as yet appears of that specialization
+which has become the characteristic of our times. He belongs
+to them by his exclusively academic interest, by the absence of
+the modern teaching activity just characterized. We shall have
+a picture of the development of mathematics if we imagine a
+chain of lofty mountains as representative of the men of the
+eighteenth century, terminating in a mighty outlying summit,---\emph{Gauss},---and
+then a broader, hilly country of lower elevation;
+but teeming with new elements of life. More immediately connected
+with Gauss we find in the following period only the
+astronomers and geodesists under the dominating influence of
+\emph{Bessel}; while in theoretical mathematics, as it begins henceforth
+to be independently cultivated in our universities, a new
+epoch begins with the second quarter of the present century,
+marked by the illustrious names of \emph{Jacobi} and \emph{Dirichlet}.
+
+\emph{Jacobi} came originally from Berlin and returned there for
+the closing years of his life (died~1851). But it is the period
+from 1826 to~1843, when he worked at Königsberg with \emph{Bessel}
+and \emph{Franz Neumann}, that must be regarded as the culmination
+of his activity. There he published in~1829 his \textit{Fundamenta
+nova theoriæ functionum ellipticarum}, in which he gave, in
+%% -----File: 112.png---Folio 102-------
+analytic form, a systematic exposition of his own discoveries
+and those of Abel in this field. Then followed a prolonged residence
+in Paris, and finally that remarkable activity as a teacher,
+which still remains without a parallel in stimulating power as
+well as in direct results in the field of pure mathematics. An
+idea of this work can be derived from the lectures on dynamics,
+edited by Clebsch in~1866, and from the complete list of his
+Königsberg lectures as compiled by Kronecker in the seventh
+volume of the \textit{Gesammelte Werke}. The new feature is that
+Jacobi lectured exclusively on those problems on which he was
+working himself, and made it his sole object to introduce his
+students into his own circle of ideas. With this end in view
+he founded, for instance, the first mathematical seminary. And
+so great was his enthusiasm that often he not only gave the
+most important new results of his researches in these lectures,
+but did not even take the time to publish them elsewhere.
+
+\emph{Dirichlet} worked first in Breslau, then for a long period
+(1831--1855) in Berlin, and finally for four years in Göttingen.
+Following Gauss, but at the same time in close connection
+with the contemporary French scholars, he chose mathematical
+physics and the theory of numbers as the central points
+of his scientific activity. It is to be noticed that his interest is
+directed less towards comprehensive developments than towards
+simplicity of conception and questions of principle; these are
+also the considerations on which he insists particularly in his
+lectures. These lectures are characterized by perfect lucidity
+and a certain refined objectivity; they are at the same time
+particularly accessible to the beginner and suggestive in a high
+degree to the more advanced reader. It may be sufficient to
+refer here to his lectures on the theory of numbers, edited by
+Dedekind; they still form the standard text-book on this subject.
+
+With Gauss, Jacobi, Dirichlet, we have named the men who
+have determined the direction of the subsequent development.
+%% -----File: 113.png---Folio 103-------
+We shall now continue our account in a different manner,
+arranging it according to the universities that have been most
+prominent from a mathematical standpoint. For henceforth,
+besides the special achievements of individual workers, the
+principle of co-operation, with its dependence on local conditions,
+comes to have more and more influence on the advancement
+of our science. Setting the upper limit of our account
+about the year~1870, we may name the universities of \emph{Königsberg},
+\emph{Berlin}, \emph{Göttingen}, and \emph{Heidelberg}.
+
+Of Jacobi's activity at Königsberg enough has already been
+said. It may now be added that even after his departure the
+university remained a centre of mathematical instruction.
+\emph{Richelot} and \emph{Hesse} knew how to maintain the high tradition of
+Jacobi, the former on the analytical, the latter on the geometrical
+side. At the same time \emph{Franz Neumann's} lectures on
+mathematical physics began to attract more and more attention
+A stately procession of mathematicians has come from
+Königsberg; there is scarcely a university in Germany to
+which Königsberg has not sent a professor.
+
+Of Berlin, too, we have already anticipated something in our
+account. The years from 1845 to~1851, during which \emph{Jacobi}
+and \emph{Dirichlet} worked together, form the culminating period of
+the first Berlin school. Besides these men the most prominent
+figure is that of \emph{Steiner} (connected with the university
+from 1835 to~1864), the founder of the German synthetic
+geometry. An altogether original character, he was a highly
+effective teacher, owing to the one-sidedness with which he
+developed his geometrical conceptions.---As an event of no
+mean importance, we must here record the foundation (in~1826)
+of \emph{Crelle's} \textit{Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik}. This,
+for decades the only German mathematical periodical, contained
+in its pages the fundamental memoirs of nearly all the eminent
+representatives of the rapidly growing science in Germany.
+%% -----File: 114.png---Folio 104-------
+Among foreign contributions the very first volumes presented
+Abel's pioneer researches. \emph{Crelle} himself conducted this periodical
+for thirty years; then followed \emph{Borchardt}, 1856--1880;
+now the Journal has reached its 110th~volume.---We must
+also mention the formation (in~1844) of the \textit{Berliner physikalische
+Gesellschaft}. Men like \emph{Helmholtz}, \emph{Kirchhoff}, and
+\emph{Clausius} have grown up here; and while these men cannot
+be assigned to mathematics in the narrower sense, their work
+has been productive of important results for our science in
+various ways. During the same period, \emph{Encke} exercised, as
+director of the Berlin astronomical observatory (1825--1862),
+a far-reaching influence by elaborating the methods of astronomical
+calculation on the lines first laid down by Gauss.---We
+leave Berlin at this point, reserving for the present the
+account of the more recent development of mathematics at
+this university.
+
+The discussion of the \emph{Göttingen school} will here find its
+appropriate place. The permanent foundation on which the
+mathematical importance of Göttingen rests is necessarily the
+Gauss tradition. This found, indeed, its direct continuation
+on the physical side when \emph{Wilhelm Weber} returned from
+Leipsic to Göttingen~(1849) and for the first time established
+systematic exercises in those methods of exact electro-magnetic
+measurement that owed their origin to Gauss and himself.
+On the mathematical side several eminent names follow in
+rapid succession. After Gauss's death, Dirichlet was called
+as his successor and transferred his great activity as a teacher
+to Göttingen, for only too brief a period (1855--59). By his
+side grew up \emph{Riemann} (1854--66), to be followed later by
+\emph{Clebsch} (1868--72).
+
+Riemann takes root in Gauss and Dirichlet; on the other
+hand he fully assimilated Cauchy's ideas as to the use of
+complex variables. Thus arose his profound creations in the
+%% -----File: 115.png---Folio 105-------
+theory of functions which ever since have proved a rich and
+permanent source of the most suggestive material. Clebsch
+sustains, so to speak, a complementary relation to Riemann.
+Coming originally from Königsberg, and occupied with mathematical
+physics, he had found during the period of his work
+at Giessen (1863--68) the particular direction which he afterwards
+followed so successfully at Göttingen. Well acquainted
+with the work of Jacobi and with modern geometry, he introduced
+into these fields the results of the algebraic researches of
+the English mathematicians Cayley and Sylvester, and on the
+double foundation thus constructed, proceeded to build up new
+approaches to the problems of the entire theory of functions,
+and in particular to Riemann's own developments. But with
+this the significance of Clebsch for the development of our
+science is not completely characterized. A man of vivid imagination
+who readily entered into the ideas of others, he influenced
+his students far beyond the limits of direct instruction;
+of an active and enterprising character, he founded, together
+with C.~Neumann in Leipsic, a new periodical, the \textit{Mathematische
+Annalen}, which has since been regularly continued,
+and is just concluding its 41st~volume.
+
+We recall further those memorable years of Heidelberg, from
+1855 to perhaps~1870. Here were delivered Hesse's elegant
+and widely read lectures on analytic geometry. Here Kirchhoff
+produced his lectures on mathematical physics. Here,
+above all, Helmholtz completed his great papers on mathematical
+physics, which in their turn served as basis for Kirchhoff's
+elegant later researches.
+
+It remains now to speak of the \emph{second Berlin school}, beginning
+also about the middle of the century, but still operating upon
+the present age. \emph{Kummer}, \emph{Kronecker}, \emph{Weierstrass}, have been
+its leaders, the first two, as students of Dirichlet, pre-eminently
+engaged in developing the theory of numbers, while the last,
+%% -----File: 116.png---Folio 106-------
+leaning more on Jacobi and Cauchy, became, together with
+Riemann, the creator of the modern theory of functions.
+Kummer's lectures can here merely be named in passing;
+with their clear arrangement and exposition they have always
+proved especially useful to the majority of students, without
+being particularly notable for their specific contents. Quite
+different is the case of Kronecker and Weierstrass, whose
+lectures became in the course of time more and more the
+expression of their scientific individuality. To a certain extent
+both have thrust intuitional methods into the background
+and, on the other hand, have in a measure avoided
+the long formal developments of our science, applying themselves
+with so much the keener criticism to the fundamental
+analytical ideas. In this direction Kronecker has gone even
+farther than Weierstrass in trying to banish altogether the
+idea of the irrational number, and to reduce all developments
+to relations between integers alone. The tendencies thus
+characterized have exerted a wide-felt influence, and give a
+distinctive character to a large part of our present mathematical
+investigations.
+
+We have thus sketched in general outlines the state reached
+by our science about the year~1870. It is impossible to carry
+our account beyond this date in a similar form. For the developments
+that now arise are not yet finished; the persons whom
+we should have to name are still in the midst of their creative
+activity. All we can do is to add a few remarks of a more
+general nature on the present aspect of mathematical science
+in Germany. Before doing this, however, we must supplement
+the preceding account in two directions.
+
+Let it above all be emphasized that even within the limits
+here chosen, we have by no means exhausted the subject. It
+is, indeed, characteristic of the German universities that their
+life is not wholly centralized,---that wherever a leader appears,
+%% -----File: 117.png---Folio 107-------
+he will find a sphere of activity. We may name here, from an
+earlier period, the acute analyst \textit{J.~Fr.~Pfaff}, who worked in
+Helmstädt and Halle from 1788 to~1825, and, at one time, had
+Gauss among his students. Pfaff was the first representative
+of the \emph{combinatory} school, which, for a time, played a great rôle
+in different German universities, but was finally pushed aside in
+the manifold development of the advancing science. We must
+further mention the three great geometers, \emph{Möbius} in Leipsic,
+\emph{Plücker} in Bonn, \emph{von~Staudt} in Erlangen. Möbius was, at the
+same time, an astronomer, and conducted the Leipsic observatory
+from 1816 till~1868. Plücker, again, devoted only the first
+half of his productive period (1826--46) to mathematics, turning
+his attention later to experimental physics (where his researches
+are well known), and only returning to geometrical investigation
+towards the close of his life (1864--68). The accidental circumstance
+that each of these three men worked as teacher only in
+a narrow circle has kept the development of modern geometry
+unduly in the background in our sketch. Passing beyond
+university circles, we may be allowed to add the name of
+\emph{Grassmann}, of Stettin, who, in his \textit{Ausdehnungslehre} (1844 and~1862),
+conceived a system embracing the results of modern
+geometrical speculation, and, from a very different field, that of
+\emph{Hansen}, of Gotha, the celebrated representative of theoretical
+astronomy.
+
+We must also mention, in a few words, the \emph{development of
+technical education}. About the middle of the century, it became
+the custom to call mathematicians of scientific eminence to the
+polytechnic schools. Foremost in this respect stands Zürich,
+which, in spite of the political boundaries, may here be counted
+as our own; indeed, quite a number of professors have taught
+in the Zürich polytechnic school who are to-day ornaments of
+the German universities. Thus the ideal of the Paris school,
+the combination of mathematical with technical education,
+%% -----File: 118.png---Folio 108-------
+became again more prominent. A considerable influence in
+this direction was exercised by \emph{Redtenbacher's} lectures on the
+theory of machines which attracted to Carlsruhe an ever-increasing
+number of enthusiastic students. Descriptive geometry and
+kinematics were scientifically elaborated. \emph{Culmann} of Zürich,
+in creating graphical statics, introduced the principles of modern
+geometry, in the happiest manner, into mechanics. In connection
+with the scientific advance thus outlined, numerous new
+polytechnic schools were founded in Germany about 1870 and
+during the following years, and some of the older schools were
+reorganized. At Munich and Dresden, in particular, in accordance
+with the example of Zürich, special departments for the
+training of teachers and professors were established. The
+polytechnic schools have thus attained great importance for
+mathematical education as well as for the advancement of the
+science. We must forbear to pursue more closely the many
+interesting questions that present themselves in this connection.
+
+If we survey the entire field of development described above,
+this, at any rate, appears as the obvious conclusion, in Germany
+as elsewhere, that the number of those who have an earnest
+interest in mathematics has increased very rapidly and that, as a
+consequence, the amount of mathematical production has grown
+to enormous proportions. In this respect an imperative need
+was supplied when \emph{Ohrtmann} and \emph{Müller} established in Berlin
+(1869) an annual bibliographical review, \textit{Die Fortschritte der
+Mathematik}, of which the 21st~volume has just appeared.
+
+In conclusion a few words should here be said concerning the
+modern development of university instruction. The principal
+effort has been to reduce the difficulty of mathematical study
+by improving the seminary arrangements and equipments.
+Not only have special seminary libraries been formed, but
+study rooms have been set aside in which these libraries
+are immediately accessible to the students. Collections of
+%% -----File: 119.png---Folio 109-------
+mathematical models and courses in drawing are calculated
+to disarm, in part at least, the hostility directed against the
+excessive abstractness of the university instruction. And
+while the students find everywhere inducements to specialized
+study, as is indeed necessary if our science is to flourish, yet
+the tendency has at the same time gained ground to emphasize
+more and more the mutual interdependence of the different
+special branches. Here the individual can accomplish but
+little; it seems necessary that many co-operate for the same
+purpose. Such considerations have led in recent years to the
+formation of a German mathematical association (\textit{Deutsche
+Mathematiker-Vereinigung}). The first annual report just issued
+(which contains a detailed report on the development of the
+theory of invariants) and a comprehensive catalogue of mathematical
+models and apparatus published at the same time indicate
+the direction that is here to be followed. With the
+present means of publication and the continually increasing
+number of new memoirs, it has become almost impossible to
+survey comprehensively the different branches of mathematics.
+Hence it is the object of the association to collect, systematize,
+maintain communication, in order that the work and
+progress of the science may not be hampered by material
+difficulties. Progress itself, however, remains---in mathematics
+even more than in other sciences---always the right
+and the achievement of the individual.
+
+{\footnotesize\textsc{Göttingen}, January, 1893.}
+%% -----File: 120.png---Folio 110-------
+%[Blank Page]
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% GUTENBERG LICENSE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\cleardoublepage
+
+\backmatter
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Back Matter}{Back Matter}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG License}{Project Gutenberg License}
+\fancyhead[C]{\textsc{LICENSING}}
+
+\begin{PGtext}
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on
+Mathematics, by Felix Klein
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM ***
+
+***** This file should be named 36154-pdf.pdf or 36154-pdf.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/6/1/5/36154/
+
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Brenda Lewis, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images from the Cornell University
+Library: Historical Mathematics Monographs collection.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+\end{PGtext}
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on
+% Mathematics, by Felix Klein %
+% %
+% *** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVANSTON COLLOQUIUM *** %
+% %
+% ***** This file should be named 36154-t.tex or 36154-t.zip ***** %
+% This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: %
+% http://www.gutenberg.org/3/6/1/5/36154/ %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\end{document}
+###
+@ControlwordReplace = (
+ ['\\Preface', 'PREFACE'],
+ ['\\ie', 'i.e.']
+ );
+
+@ControlwordArguments = (
+ ['\\pdfbookmark', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Lecture', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, 'Lecture ', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Addendum', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Input', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Figure', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\WFigure', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Figures', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPtypo', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPnote', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\pageref', 1, 0, '', '00'],
+ ['\\linestretch', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Date', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Name', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\First', 1, 1, '', '']
+ );
+###
+This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) (format=pdflatex 2010.5.6) 18 MAY 2011 11:49
+entering extended mode
+ %&-line parsing enabled.
+**36154-t.tex
+(./36154-t.tex
+LaTeX2e <2005/12/01>
+Babel <v3.8h> and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumylang, noh
+yphenation, arabic, farsi, croatian, ukrainian, russian, bulgarian, czech, slov
+ak, danish, dutch, finnish, basque, french, german, ngerman, ibycus, greek, mon
+ogreek, ancientgreek, hungarian, italian, latin, mongolian, norsk, icelandic, i
+nterlingua, turkish, coptic, romanian, welsh, serbian, slovenian, estonian, esp
+eranto, uppersorbian, indonesian, polish, portuguese, spanish, catalan, galicia
+n, swedish, ukenglish, pinyin, loaded.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/book.cls
+Document Class: book 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/bk12.clo
+File: bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+)
+\c@part=\count79
+\c@chapter=\count80
+\c@section=\count81
+\c@subsection=\count82
+\c@subsubsection=\count83
+\c@paragraph=\count84
+\c@subparagraph=\count85
+\c@figure=\count86
+\c@table=\count87
+\abovecaptionskip=\skip41
+\belowcaptionskip=\skip42
+\bibindent=\dimen102
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty
+Package: inputenc 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+\inpenc@prehook=\toks14
+\inpenc@posthook=\toks15
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/latin1.def
+File: latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty
+Package: ifthen 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsmath.sty
+Package: amsmath 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+\@mathmargin=\skip43
+For additional information on amsmath, use the `?' option.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amstext.sty
+Package: amstext 2000/06/29 v2.01
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsgen.sty
+File: amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+\@emptytoks=\toks16
+\ex@=\dimen103
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsbsy.sty
+Package: amsbsy 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+\pmbraise@=\dimen104
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsopn.sty
+Package: amsopn 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+)
+\inf@bad=\count88
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \frac on input line 211.
+\uproot@=\count89
+\leftroot@=\count90
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \overline on input line 307.
+\classnum@=\count91
+\DOTSCASE@=\count92
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ldots on input line 379.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \dots on input line 382.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \cdots on input line 467.
+\Mathstrutbox@=\box26
+\strutbox@=\box27
+\big@size=\dimen105
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OML on input line 567.
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OMS on input line 568.
+\macc@depth=\count93
+\c@MaxMatrixCols=\count94
+\dotsspace@=\muskip10
+\c@parentequation=\count95
+\dspbrk@lvl=\count96
+\tag@help=\toks17
+\row@=\count97
+\column@=\count98
+\maxfields@=\count99
+\andhelp@=\toks18
+\eqnshift@=\dimen106
+\alignsep@=\dimen107
+\tagshift@=\dimen108
+\tagwidth@=\dimen109
+\totwidth@=\dimen110
+\lineht@=\dimen111
+\@envbody=\toks19
+\multlinegap=\skip44
+\multlinetaggap=\skip45
+\mathdisplay@stack=\toks20
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \[ on input line 2666.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \] on input line 2667.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amssymb.sty
+Package: amssymb 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amsfonts.sty
+Package: amsfonts 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+\symAMSa=\mathgroup4
+\symAMSb=\mathgroup5
+LaTeX Font Info: Overwriting math alphabet `\mathfrak' in version `bold'
+(Font) U/euf/m/n --> U/euf/b/n on input line 132.
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/alltt.sty
+Package: alltt 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/footmisc/footmisc.sty
+Package: footmisc 2005/03/17 v5.3d a miscellany of footnote facilities
+\FN@temptoken=\toks21
+\footnotemargin=\dimen112
+\c@pp@next@reset=\count100
+\c@@fnserial=\count101
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style bringhurst on input line 817.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style chicago on input line 818.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style wiley on input line 819.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style lamport-robust on input line 823.
+
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style lamport* on input line 831.
+Package footmisc Info: Declaring symbol style lamport*-robust on input line 840
+.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/bigfoot/perpage.sty
+Package: perpage 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+\c@abspage=\count102
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
+Package: caption 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption3.sty
+Package: caption3 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty
+Package: keyval 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+\KV@toks@=\toks22
+)
+\captionmargin=\dimen113
+\captionmarginx=\dimen114
+\captionwidth=\dimen115
+\captionindent=\dimen116
+\captionparindent=\dimen117
+\captionhangindent=\dimen118
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphicx.sty
+Package: graphicx 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphics.sty
+Package: graphics 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/trig.sty
+Package: trig 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/graphics.cfg
+File: graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package graphics Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 90.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/pdftex-def/pdftex.def
+File: pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+\Gread@gobject=\count103
+))
+\Gin@req@height=\dimen119
+\Gin@req@width=\dimen120
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/wrapfig/wrapfig.sty
+\wrapoverhang=\dimen121
+\WF@size=\dimen122
+\c@WF@wrappedlines=\count104
+\WF@box=\box28
+\WF@everypar=\toks23
+Package: wrapfig 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/indentfirst.sty
+Package: indentfirst 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/textcase/textcase.sty
+Package: textcase 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/yfonts/yfonts.sty
+Package: yfonts 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/calc.sty
+Package: calc 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+\calc@Acount=\count105
+\calc@Bcount=\count106
+\calc@Adimen=\dimen123
+\calc@Bdimen=\dimen124
+\calc@Askip=\skip46
+\calc@Bskip=\skip47
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \setlength on input line 75.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \addtolength on input line 76.
+\calc@Ccount=\count107
+\calc@Cskip=\skip48
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/fancyhdr/fancyhdr.sty
+\fancy@headwidth=\skip49
+\f@ncyO@elh=\skip50
+\f@ncyO@erh=\skip51
+\f@ncyO@olh=\skip52
+\f@ncyO@orh=\skip53
+\f@ncyO@elf=\skip54
+\f@ncyO@erf=\skip55
+\f@ncyO@olf=\skip56
+\f@ncyO@orf=\skip57
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/geometry/geometry.sty
+Package: geometry 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+\Gm@cnth=\count108
+\Gm@cntv=\count109
+\c@Gm@tempcnt=\count110
+\Gm@bindingoffset=\dimen125
+\Gm@wd@mp=\dimen126
+\Gm@odd@mp=\dimen127
+\Gm@even@mp=\dimen128
+\Gm@dimlist=\toks24
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/xelatex/xetexconfig/geometry.cfg)) (/usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty
+Package: hyperref 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+\@linkdim=\dimen129
+\Hy@linkcounter=\count111
+\Hy@pagecounter=\count112
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/pd1enc.def
+File: pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/hyperref.cfg
+File: hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/kvoptions.sty
+Package: kvoptions 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (
+HO)
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Option `hyperfootnotes' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `linktocpage' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfdisplaydoctitle' set `true' on input line 223
+8.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfpagelabels' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarksopen' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `colorlinks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 2288.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 2293.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 2296.
+Package hyperref Info: Plain pages OFF on input line 2303.
+Package hyperref Info: Backreferencing OFF on input line 2308.
+Implicit mode ON; LaTeX internals redefined
+Package hyperref Info: Bookmarks ON on input line 2444.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ltxmisc/url.sty
+\Urlmuskip=\muskip11
+Package: url 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \url on input line 2599.
+\Fld@menulength=\count113
+\Field@Width=\dimen130
+\Fld@charsize=\dimen131
+\Choice@toks=\toks25
+\Field@toks=\toks26
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 3102.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 3107.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 3110.
+Package hyperref Info: backreferencing OFF on input line 3117.
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 3120.
+\Hy@abspage=\count114
+\c@Item=\count115
+)
+*hyperref using driver hpdftex*
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hpdftex.def
+File: hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+\Fld@listcount=\count116
+)
+\c@pp@a@footnote=\count117
+\TmpLen=\skip58
+\c@figno=\count118
+(./36154-t.aux)
+\openout1 = `36154-t.aux'.
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LY/yfrak/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LYG/ygoth/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for PD1/pdf/m/n on input line 443.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 443.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ragged2e/ragged2e.sty
+Package: ragged2e 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/everysel/everysel.sty
+Package: everysel 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \selectfont on input line 125.
+)
+\CenteringLeftskip=\skip59
+\RaggedLeftLeftskip=\skip60
+\RaggedRightLeftskip=\skip61
+\CenteringRightskip=\skip62
+\RaggedLeftRightskip=\skip63
+\RaggedRightRightskip=\skip64
+\CenteringParfillskip=\skip65
+\RaggedLeftParfillskip=\skip66
+\RaggedRightParfillskip=\skip67
+\JustifyingParfillskip=\skip68
+\CenteringParindent=\skip69
+\RaggedLeftParindent=\skip70
+\RaggedRightParindent=\skip71
+\JustifyingParindent=\skip72
+)
+Package caption Info: hyperref package v6.74m (or newer) detected on input line
+ 443.
+(/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/supp-pdf.tex
+[Loading MPS to PDF converter (version 2006.09.02).]
+\scratchcounter=\count119
+\scratchdimen=\dimen132
+\scratchbox=\box29
+\nofMPsegments=\count120
+\nofMParguments=\count121
+\everyMPshowfont=\toks27
+\MPscratchCnt=\count122
+\MPscratchDim=\dimen133
+\MPnumerator=\count123
+\everyMPtoPDFconversion=\toks28
+)
+-------------------- Geometry parameters
+paper: class default
+landscape: --
+twocolumn: --
+twoside: true
+asymmetric: --
+h-parts: 9.03375pt, 361.34999pt, 9.03375pt
+v-parts: 13.98709pt, 543.19225pt, 20.98065pt
+hmarginratio: 1:1
+vmarginratio: 2:3
+lines: --
+heightrounded: --
+bindingoffset: 0.0pt
+truedimen: --
+includehead: true
+includefoot: true
+includemp: --
+driver: pdftex
+-------------------- Page layout dimensions and switches
+\paperwidth 379.4175pt
+\paperheight 578.15999pt
+\textwidth 361.34999pt
+\textheight 481.31845pt
+\oddsidemargin -63.23624pt
+\evensidemargin -63.23624pt
+\topmargin -58.2829pt
+\headheight 12.0pt
+\headsep 19.8738pt
+\footskip 30.0pt
+\marginparwidth 98.0pt
+\marginparsep 7.0pt
+\columnsep 10.0pt
+\skip\footins 10.8pt plus 4.0pt minus 2.0pt
+\hoffset 0.0pt
+\voffset 0.0pt
+\mag 1000
+\@twosidetrue \@mparswitchtrue
+(1in=72.27pt, 1cm=28.45pt)
+-----------------------
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/color.sty
+Package: color 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+(/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/color.cfg
+File: color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package color Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 130.
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 443.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty
+Package: nameref 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/refcount.sty
+Package: refcount 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+)
+\c@section@level=\count124
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ref on input line 443.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \pageref on input line 443.
+(./36154-t.out) (./36154-t.out)
+\@outlinefile=\write3
+\openout3 = `36154-t.out'.
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msa on input line 483.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsa.fd
+File: umsa.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msb on input line 483.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsb.fd
+File: umsb.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+) [1
+
+{/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] [2
+
+] [1
+
+] <./images/illo002.png, id=109, 227.85126pt x 89.33376pt>
+File: ./images/illo002.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo002.png> [2 <./images/illo002.png (PNG copy)>] [3] [4] [5
+
+] [6] [7] (./36154-t.toc)
+\tf@toc=\write4
+\openout4 = `36154-t.toc'.
+
+
+Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 1--730
+
+ []
+
+[8
+
+] [1
+
+
+] [2] [3] [4]
+Underfull \hbox (badness 4096) in paragraph at lines 941--941
+[][]\OT1/cmr/m/it/10 Ueber zwei Ber^^?uhrungsprobleme\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 , Vol. 4 (
+1871), pp. 527--549.---\OT1/cmr/m/it/10 Ueber
+ []
+
+[5] [6] [7] [8
+
+] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16
+
+] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] <./images/illo036.png, id=289, 594.22pt x 258.9
+675pt>
+File: ./images/illo036.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo036.png> [23
+
+] [24 <./images/illo036.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/illo037.png, id=303, 166.622
+5pt x 167.62625pt>
+File: ./images/illo037.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo037.png> <./images/illo038.png, id=307, 189.70876pt x 194.727
+5pt>
+File: ./images/illo038.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo038.png> [25 <./images/illo037.png (PNG copy)>] [26 <./images
+/illo038.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/illo039.png, id=322, 236.885pt x 334.24875p
+t>
+File: ./images/illo039.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo039.png> <./images/illo041.png, id=325, 257.96375pt x 287.072
+5pt>
+File: ./images/illo041.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo041.png> [27 <./images/illo039.png (PNG copy)>] [28 <./images
+/illo041.png (PNG copy)>] [29] [30] [31
+
+] [32] <./images/illo045.png, id=361, 611.28375pt x 166.6225pt>
+File: ./images/illo045.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo045.png> [33 <./images/illo045.png (PNG copy)>] [34] <./image
+s/illo047a.png, id=376, 217.81375pt x 251.94125pt>
+File: ./images/illo047a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo047a.png> <./images/illo047b.png, id=377, 226.8475pt x 226.84
+75pt>
+File: ./images/illo047b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo047b.png> [35 <./images/illo047a.png (PNG copy)> <./images/il
+lo047b.png (PNG copy)>] [36] [37] [38
+
+] <./images/illo052.png, id=402, 213.79875pt x 78.2925pt>
+File: ./images/illo052.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo052.png> <./images/illo053.png, id=405, 362.35374pt x 373.395
+pt>
+File: ./images/illo053.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo053.png> [39 <./images/illo052.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/ill
+o054.png, id=415, 298.11375pt x 244.915pt>
+File: ./images/illo054.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo054.png> [40 <./images/illo053.png (PNG copy)>] [41 <./images
+/illo054.png (PNG copy)>] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47
+
+] [48] [49] [50] [51] <./images/illo066.png, id=490, 277.035pt x 209.78375pt>
+File: ./images/illo066.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo066.png> [52 <./images/illo066.png (PNG copy)>] [53
+
+] <./images/illo070.png, id=508, 514.92375pt x 376.40625pt>
+File: ./images/illo070.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo070.png> [54] [55 <./images/illo070.png (PNG copy)>] <./image
+s/illo072.png, id=521, 482.80376pt x 350.30875pt>
+File: ./images/illo072.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo072.png> [56] <./images/illo073.png, id=528, 284.06125pt x 21
+8.8175pt>
+File: ./images/illo073.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo073.png> [57 <./images/illo072.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/ill
+o074.png, id=538, 303.1325pt x 250.9375pt>
+File: ./images/illo074.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo074.png> [58 <./images/illo073.png (PNG copy)>] [59 <./images
+/illo074.png (PNG copy)>] [60] [61] [62
+
+] <./images/illo079a.png, id=566, 630.355pt x 218.8175pt>
+File: ./images/illo079a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo079a.png> <./images/illo079b.png, id=568, 203.76125pt x 191.7
+1625pt>
+File: ./images/illo079b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo079b.png> [63]
+Underfull \hbox (badness 1173) in paragraph at lines 3151--3166
+[]\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 The tri-an-gles cor-re-spond-ing to the up-per
+ []
+
+[64 <./images/illo079a.png (PNG copy)> <./images/illo079b.png (PNG copy)>] <./i
+mages/illo081.png, id=586, 620.3175pt x 209.78375pt>
+File: ./images/illo081.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo081.png> [65 <./images/illo081.png (PNG copy)>] [66] [67]
+Underfull \hbox (badness 4927) in paragraph at lines 3337--3337
+[][]\OT1/cmr/m/it/10 Ueber die quatern^^?are, endliche, lin-eare Sub-sti-tu-tio
+n-s-gruppe der Bor-
+ []
+
+[68] [69] [70
+
+] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79
+
+] [80] [81] [82] [83] <./images/illo101a.png, id=675, 320.19624pt x 123.46124pt
+>
+File: ./images/illo101a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo101a.png> <./images/illo101b.png, id=676, 244.915pt x 298.113
+75pt>
+File: ./images/illo101b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/illo101b.png> [84 <./images/illo101a.png (PNG copy)>] [85 <./imag
+es/illo101b.png (PNG copy)>] [86] [87
+
+] [88] [89] [90] [91
+
+] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101
+
+
+] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] (./36154-t.aux)
+
+ *File List*
+ book.cls 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+ bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+inputenc.sty 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ ifthen.sty 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+ amsmath.sty 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+ amstext.sty 2000/06/29 v2.01
+ amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+ amsbsy.sty 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+ amsopn.sty 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+ amssymb.sty 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+amsfonts.sty 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+ alltt.sty 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+footmisc.sty 2005/03/17 v5.3d a miscellany of footnote facilities
+ perpage.sty 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+ caption.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+caption3.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+ keyval.sty 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+graphicx.sty 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+graphics.sty 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+ trig.sty 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+ wrapfig.sty 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+indentfirst.sty 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+textcase.sty 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+ yfonts.sty 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+ calc.sty 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+fancyhdr.sty
+geometry.sty 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+geometry.cfg
+hyperref.sty 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+ pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+kvoptions.sty 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (HO
+)
+ url.sty 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+ hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+ragged2e.sty 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+everysel.sty 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+supp-pdf.tex
+ color.sty 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+ color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ nameref.sty 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+refcount.sty 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+ 36154-t.out
+ 36154-t.out
+ umsa.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+ umsb.fd 2002/01/19 v2.2g AMS font definitions
+./images/illo002.png
+./images/illo036.png
+./images/illo037.png
+./images/illo038.png
+./images/illo039.png
+./images/illo041.png
+./images/illo045.png
+./images/illo047a.png
+./images/illo047b.png
+./images/illo052.png
+./images/illo053.png
+./images/illo054.png
+./images/illo066.png
+./images/illo070.png
+./images/illo072.png
+./images/illo073.png
+./images/illo074.png
+./images/illo079a.png
+./images/illo079b.png
+./images/illo081.png
+./images/illo101a.png
+./images/illo101b.png
+ ***********
+
+ )
+Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
+ 5735 strings out of 94074
+ 79136 string characters out of 1165154
+ 139269 words of memory out of 1500000
+ 8654 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+50000
+ 17959 words of font info for 68 fonts, out of 1200000 for 2000
+ 647 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
+ 34i,14n,43p,1166b,484s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,6000p,200000b,5000s
+</usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmbx12.pfb></usr/share/texmf
+-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmcsc10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/typ
+e1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi1
+0.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi12.pfb></usr/share/t
+exmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi6.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/t
+ype1/bluesky/cm/cmmi7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi
+8.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/ty
+pe1/bluesky/cm/cmr17.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr6.
+pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr8.pfb></usr/share/texmf
+-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type
+1/bluesky/cm/cmsy7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy8.p
+fb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmti10.pfb></usr/share/texm
+f-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmti12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/typ
+e1/bluesky/cm/cmti8.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmtt9.
+pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/ams/msam10.pfb></usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/gothic/ygoth.pfb>
+Output written on 36154-t.pdf (119 pages, 577424 bytes).
+PDF statistics:
+ 922 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
+ 240 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 131072)
+ 287 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)
+
diff --git a/36154-t/old/36154-t.zip b/36154-t/old/36154-t.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9914b4a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36154-t/old/36154-t.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cc4e9ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #36154 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/36154)