diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:01:46 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:01:46 -0700 |
| commit | 1523d10b39501caf5a42a1fee54cbf67f61414c9 (patch) | |
| tree | a8fb69913f60fd0f889478cedeb837a07f1955b8 | |
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510-8.txt | 1941 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510-8.zip | bin | 0 -> 33642 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 151223 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510-h/34510-h.htm | 2060 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510-h/images/fisetin.jpg | bin | 0 -> 10253 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510-h/images/i_08a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 42775 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510-h/images/i_09a.jpg | bin | 0 -> 61763 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510.txt | 1941 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 34510.zip | bin | 0 -> 33621 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 |
12 files changed, 5958 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/34510-8.txt b/34510-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9a4c8b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/34510-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1941 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy Plant: +(Rhus Toxicodendron), by William Anderson Syme + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy Plant: (Rhus Toxicodendron) + +Author: William Anderson Syme + +Release Date: November 30, 2010 [EBook #34510] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SOME CONSTITUENTS--POISON IVY PLANT *** + + + + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Josephine Paolucci and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This +book was produced from scanned images of public domain +material from the Google Print project.) + + + + + + + + +SOME CONSTITUENTS OF THE POISON IVY PLANT (RHUS TOXICODENDRON) + +DISSERTATION + +SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF UNIVERSITY STUDIES OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS +UNIVERSITY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR +OF PHILOSOPHY + +BY WILLIAM ANDERSON SYME + +1906 + +1906 +THE SUN JOB PRINTING OFFICE +BALTIMORE + +Transcriber's Note: Underscores around words indicates italics while an +underscore and curly brackets in an equation indicates a subscript. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + +Acknowledgments 4 + +Literature 5 + +Introduction 7 + +Work of Khittel 11 + +Work of Maisch 12 + +Work of Pfaff 13 + +Experimental 14 + + Gallic Acid 18 + + Fisetin 20 + + Rhamnose 23 + + The Poison 28 + + Potassium Permanganate as a Remedy for Rhus Poisoning 35 + +Summary 37 + +Biography 38 + + + + +ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. + + +The author desires to avail himself of this opportunity to tender his +thanks to those under whose guidance he has worked while a student at +the Johns Hopkins University, namely to Professors Remsen, Morse, Jones, +and Andrews, and to Doctors Acree and Tingle for instruction in lecture +room and laboratory. + +He is especially indebted to Dr. S. F. Acree, at whose suggestion this +research work was undertaken, for counsel and assistance in its +prosecution. + +He would also thank Messrs. Parke, Davis and Co., of Detroit, Mich., for +the preparation of the crude material used in this investigation, and +the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., for electrotypes +of figures 17, 18, and 19 in Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany. + + + + +LITERATURE. + + +Acides Gummiques, Garros (Dissertation) 1895. + +American Chemical Journal. + +American Journal of the Medical Sciences. + +American Journal of Pharmacy. + +Annalen der Chemie und der Pharmacie (Liebig). + +Annales de Chimie et de Physique. + +Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft. + +Biochemie der Pflanzen (Czapek) 1905. + +Brooklyn Medical Journal. + +Bulletin de la Société Chimique. + +Bulletins 20 and 26 U. S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Botany. + +Chemie der Zuckerarten, Von Lippmann, 1904. + +Chemiker-Zeitung. + +Comptes rendus. + +Industries of Japan, J. J. Rein. + +Journal of the Chemical Society. + +Journal of Experimental Medicine. + +Les Sucres, Maquenne, 1900. + +Manual of Botany, 6th Edition, Gray. + +Medical and Surgical Reporter. + +New York Medical Record. + +Proceedings of the American Pharmaceutical Association. + +Treatise on Chemistry, Roscoe and Schorlemmer. + +Über Mategerbstoff, Reuchlin (Dissertation) 1904. + + + + +SOME CONSTITUENTS OF THE POISON IVY PLANT. + +(RHUS TOXICODENDRON) + + + + +INTRODUCTION. + + +Plants belonging to the natural order Anacardiaciæ (Cashew family or +Sumach family) are found in all the temperate climates of the world and +quite frequently in semi-tropical climates. Many of these plants play +important parts in economic botany, yielding dye-stuffs, tanning +material, wax, varnish, and drugs. Several species are poisonous. At +least three poisonous species of the genus _Rhus_ are found in the +United States. These three are all common and well-known plants, but +confusion frequently arises concerning them on account of the different +names by which they are known in different localities. For example, +poison ivy (_Rhus toxicodendron_ or _Rhus radicans_) probably the best +known poisonous plant in America, being found in all the States except +those in the extreme West, is often confounded with and popularly called +"poison oak." The true poison oak is the _Rhus diversiloba_ of the +Western States.[1] The third and most poisonous species of this plant is +_Rhus venenata_ or _Rhus vernix_; it is the _Rhus vernicifera_ of Japan, +from which Japanese lac is obtained. It is popularly known in the United +States as "poison sumach," "poison dogwood" and "poison elder." It grows +in swamps from Canada to Florida. + +As the poison ivy is by far the most common of these plants in the +Eastern States, a brief description of it is given here:[2] A shrub +climbing by rootlets over rocks, etc., or ascending trees, or sometimes +low and erect; leaflets 3, rhombic-ovate, mostly pointed, and rather +downy beneath, variously notched, sinuate, or cut-lobed; high climbing +plants (_R. radicans_) having usually more entire leaves. It is found in +thickets, low grounds, etc. Greenish flowers appear in June. + +[Illustration: Fig. 1.--Poison ivy (_Rhus radicans_ or _Rhus +toxicodendron_). _a_, spray showing aerial rootlets and leaves; _b_, +fruit--both one-fourth natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)] + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.--Poison oak (_Rhus diversiloba_) showing leaves, +flowers, and fruit, one-third natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)] + +In the general description of the order Anacardiaciæ, Gray[3] says: +"Juice or exhalations often poisonous." Whether it is contact with some +part of the plant, or with the exhalation from the plant, that causes +the well-known skin eruption has been a topic for discussion ever since +its source was known. On account of its intangible nature there has been +more speculation than experimental evidence bearing on this question, +although a few investigations have been made with the object of +isolating the poison. It is most generally believed that the exhalations +are poisonous. Dr. J. H. Hunt[4] states that the exhalations have been +collected in a jar and found to be capable of inflaming and blistering +the skin of an arm plunged into it. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3--Poison sumach (_Rhus vernix_), showing leaves, +fruit, and leaf-scars, one-fourth natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)] + +Prof. J. J. Rein,[5] in his treatise on Lacquer Work, describes the +poison of the Japanese lac tree, _Rhus vernicifera_, as being volatile, +as do also the Japanese chemist Yoshida[6] and the French chemist +Bertrand.[7] Recent work by Prof. A. B. Stevens,[8] however, seems to +show that this poison is not volatile, and is similar to, if not +identical with that obtained by Pfaff[9] from _Rhus toxicodendron_ and +_Rhus venenata_. + +Not many cases of internal poisoning by _Rhus toxicodendron_ are on +record in medical literature. Two cases of poisoning from eating the +fruit of this plant have been described.[10] The subjects of these cases +were two children who had eaten nearly a pint of the fruit. The symptoms +are described in detail, being in general, similar to those of +alkaloidal poisoning. Warm water was given to promote emesis; afterwards +large quantities of carbonate of soda were given in solution under the +belief that it was an antidote to the poison. Otherwise they were +treated on general principles. Both children recovered. + +Another case of internal poisoning is the following:[11] Three children +drank an infusion of the root of poison ivy thinking it was sassafras +tea. The first of these cases was diagnosed as measles, but on the +appearance of similar symptoms in the sisters of the first patient, the +cause of the trouble was found. All recovered. + +Dr. Pfaff[12] explains the few fatal cases that have followed Rhus +poisoning on the assumption that enough of the poison was absorbed +through the skin to cause renal complications in persons having chronic +kidney trouble. He showed that the poison, when given internally, +produces a marked effect on the kidneys, causing nephritis and fatty +degeneration of this organ. + +The irritating action of poison ivy has been attributed at different +times to the "exhalation," to a volatile alkaloid, to a volatile acid, +and to a non-volatile oil. Pfaff,[13] who made the most recent +investigation of this poison, obtained from the plant a non-volatile oil +having the same action on the skin as the plant itself. He found this +oil in all parts of the plant and concluded that it was the active +principle, and that one could be poisoned only by actual contact with +some part of the plant. He assumed minute quantities of pollen dust to +be in the air to account for the cases of "action at a distance" so +frequently quoted. Pfaff says: "In my opinion, it is more than doubtful +if ever a case of ivy poisoning has occurred without direct contact with +the plant or with some article that has been in contact with the plant. +The long latent period of the eruption in some cases may obviously +render mistakes extremely easy as to the occasion when contact with the +plant really occurred." Granting, however, that the active principle is +practically non-volatile when isolated from the plant, we cannot say +positively that it is not volatile in the juices of the plant, or under +the influence of vital forces. It is quite conceivable that the water +transpired by the leaves of the plant may carry with it a quantity of +the poison sufficient to produce the dermatitis on a person very +susceptible to its action. It is also conceivable that a volatile poison +manufactured by a living plant could become non-volatile by changes in +it consequent upon the death of the plant. + +Up to the present time, only three important chemical investigations of +the active principle of _Rhus toxicodendron_ have appeared in medical +and chemical literature, these being the researches of Dr. J. Khittel, +J. M. Maisch, a pharmacist, and Dr. Franz Pfaff, of the Harvard +University Medical School, to whose work reference has been frequently +made. The chemical work of these investigators and their conclusions are +given here in some detail for the sake of completeness. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[1] Chesnut. Bull. No. 20, U. S. Dept. of Agr., Div. of Botany. + +[2] Man. of Bot., p. 119. + +[3] Man. of Bot., p. 119. + +[4] Brook. Med. Jour., June, 1897. + +[5] Rein, The Ind. of Jap., p. 338, et seq. + +[6] H. Yoshida on Urushi Lacquer, Jour. Chem. Soc., 1883, p. 472. + +[7] Ann. de Chem. et de Phys., Series VII, Vol. 12, p. 125, 1897. + +[8] Amer. Jour. Pharm. 78, p. 53, Feb., 1906. + +[9] An account of Pfaff's work will be found in another part of this +paper. + +[10] Amer. Jour. Med. Sci. 51 (1866), p. 560. + +[11] Med. and Surg. Rep. 17, Nov., 1867. + +[12] Jour. Exp. Med. 2 (1897), p. 181. + +[13] Ibid. + + + + +KHITTEL'S INVESTIGATION. + + +The first attempt to find the poisonous constituent of this plant was +made by Khittel in 1857. His work was published in _Wittstein's +Vierteljahrresschrift für praktische Pharmacie_, VII, 348-359.[14] +Khittel obtained 37-1/2 ounces of fresh leaves of poison ivy from the +botanical garden in Munich, dried them, and got a residue of 9-1/2 +ounces which he analyzed. Not detecting anything to which the poisonous +qualities of the plant could be attributed, he made another series of +experiments which, as he thought, showed that a volatile alkaloid is the +poisonous constituent. It was obtained by the following process: "3 +ounces of the powdered leaves were infused with hot distilled water, +after three days strained, expressed, the liquid evaporated to 3 ounces, +and with the addition of potassa, carefully distilled to one-half. The +clear, colorless distillate had an alkaline reaction, and an odor +resembling henbane or hemlock. It was saturated with sulphuric acid, +evaporated, and treated with a mixture of equal quantities of alcohol +and ether which left sulphate of ammonia behind, the solution was +evaporated spontaneously, distilled with potassa, the alkaline +distillate neutralized with hydrochloric acid, and a precipitate could +now be obtained with chloride of platinum. Want of material prevented +further experiments." + +The editor of the _American Journal of Pharmacy_ inserts the following +note: "It would have been more satisfactory if the author had given some +physiological evidence of the poisonous nature of the alkaloid +substance obtained. It is quite interesting to hear that the hitherto +intangible venom of this plant has at last been detected." + +FOOTNOTES: + +[14] A free translation of this paper is given in Amer. Jour. Pharm. for +1858, p. 542. + + + + +WORK OF MAISCH.[15] + + +The next investigation of this plant was made by Maisch in 1864. He +criticizes Khittel's experiments as follows: "It is well known that the +_exhalations_ of _Rhus toxicodendron_ exert a poisonous influence on the +human body; the poisonous principle must, therefore, be volatile and, at +the same time, be naturally in such a loose state of combination as to +be continually eliminated and separated with the usual products of +vegetable exhalations. It is natural to suppose that during the process +of drying, the greatest portion of the poisonous principle should be +lost. The loss must be still greater if the dried leaves are powdered, a +hot infusion prepared from them, and this infusion evaporated down to +the original weight of the dried leaves. It is obvious that Dr. Khittel +could not have selected a better method for obtaining the least possible +quantity of the poisonous principle, if, indeed, it could be obtained by +this process at all." + +Maisch then worked up 8-3/4 ounces of the leaves of the plant in a way +to get the alkaloid, making some improvements on Khittel's method, but +failed to find it. Believing that the poison was a volatile acid, he +enclosed some fresh leaves of the plant in a tin box with several test +papers. The blue litmus paper became red showing the presence of an +acid. He concluded from this experiment that the exhalations of the +leaves contained a volatile organic acid which he thought was the +poisonous substance. To determine this point, he prepared the acid in +larger quantity by macerating the leaves with water, expressing and +distilling the expressed juice. He was poisoned in doing this work +although he had not been affected by handling the living plant and had +considered himself immune. He obtained an acid which investigation +showed to be somewhat like formic acid, more like acetic acid, but +having some reactions different from both. "Taking all the reactions +together, it is unquestionably a new organic acid for which I propose +the name of _Toxicodendric Acid_," writes Maisch. He further says: "That +it is the principle to which poison oak owes its effects on the human +system was proved to my entire satisfaction by the copious eruption and +formation of numerous vesicles on the back of my hand, on the fingers, +wrists, and bare arms while I was distilling and operating with it. +Several persons coming into the room while I was engaged with it were +more or less poisoned by the vapours diffused in the room; and I even +transferred the poisonous effects to some persons, merely by shaking +hands with them. + +"The diluted acid, as obtained by me, and stronger solutions of its +salts, were applied to several persons, and eruptions were produced in +several instances, probably by the former, though not always, which was +most likely owing to the dilute state of the acid. Whenever this was +boiled, I always felt the same itching sensation in the face, and on the +bare arms, which I experience on continual exposure of my hands to the +juice of the plant." + +Toxicodendric acid was thought to be the active principle from the time +of Maisch's work until the investigation by Pfaff in 1895. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[15] Proc. Amer. Pharm. Assn. 1865, p. 166, and Amer. Jour. Pharm. 1866, +p. 4. + + + + +PFAFF'S WORK. + + +By far the most valuable work on _Rhus toxicodendron_ is that of Pfaff. +From a clinical study of Rhus poisoning, Pfaff came to the conclusion +that the poison must be a non-volatile skin irritant. The more volatile +the irritant, the quicker is its action on the skin. Formic acid acts +very quickly; acetic acid, less volatile than formic, acts more slowly, +but still much more quickly than poison ivy, the latent period of which +is usually from two to five days. Pfaff thought that the volatile acid +obtained by Maisch might have contained some of the poisonous principle +as an impurity, but that it would not produce the dermatitis if prepared +in a pure state. He therefore prepared a quantity of the acid by +distilling the finely divided fresh plant with steam. The yield was +increased by acidulating the mixture with sulphuric acid before the +distillation. The acid distillate so obtained was freed from a +non-poisonous oily substance by shaking the solution with ether. Barium +and sodium salts were made by neutralizing the acid, and were purified +by crystallization. Analysis showed them to be salts of acetic acid, and +they gave the characteristic tests for this acid. The toxicodendric acid +of Maisch was thus shown to be acetic acid, and was therefore not the +poisonous principle of the plant. + +Pfaff obtained the active principle by the following process: The plant +was extracted with alcohol, the alcohol was distilled off, and the +residue was taken up in ether. The ether solution was washed with water +and dilute sodium carbonate solution, and the ether was evaporated. An +oily, black, poisonous substance partly soluble in alcohol was obtained. +To get the active principle in a pure state, this residue was extracted +with alcohol and filtered and the filtrate was precipitated fractionally +by lead acetate. The final precipitates consisted of the lead compound +of the poison in a pure state. On decomposing the lead compounds with +ammonium sulphide, shaking out with ether, and letting the ether +evaporate spontaneously, a non-volatile oil was obtained which gave the +characteristic skin eruptions. The pure lead compounds made in different +preparations were analyzed and assigned the formula C_{21}H_{30}O_{4}Pb. +The oil itself was not analyzed. Pfaff proposed the name _Toxicodendrol_ +for the oil. He found that it was not volatile, was decomposed by heat, +was soluble in alcohol, ether, chloroform, benzene, etc., but insoluble +in water. Its effects upon the human skin were studied in many +experiments upon himself and others. It was shown that an exceedingly +minute quantity of the poison will produce the dermatitis, even 1/1000 +milligram applied in olive oil being active. The oil was given +internally to rabbits, its effects being most marked on the kidneys. + +The oil obtained by Pfaff from _Rhus venenata_ seemed to be identical +with that from _Rhus toxicodendron_. + + + + +EXPERIMENTAL. + + +The writer's investigation was undertaken with the object of attempting +to throw more light on the chemical nature of the poisonous substance +found in _Rhus toxicodendron_. Soon after commencing work, however, it +became apparent that the poison could be more intelligently studied if +the substances associated with it in the plant were first identified; +the scope of the work was therefore extended to an investigation of the +other constituents of the plant, and it was hoped that a knowledge of +the properties of these constituents would suggest a more economical way +of getting the poison than the method of fractional precipitation. + +The crude material for this work was prepared by Messrs. Parke, Davis & +Co., of Detroit, Mich., according to special instructions submitted to +them: 67-1/2 pounds of fresh leaves and flowers of poison ivy were +collected near Detroit and carefully inspected by a competent botanist. +This material was thoroughly macerated and put into ten-liter bottles +with ether. The mass was thoroughly shaken, water being added to make it +more mobile. The ether was then separated off and the extraction was +repeated three times in the same way to insure complete removal of the +toxicodendrol. The ether extracts were combined, thoroughly dried with +anhydrous sodium sulphate, and the ether was distilled off, the +temperature being kept below 40° C. during the entire distillation. The +residue after the removal of the ether was a thick, black, tar-like +mass, weighing 3 pounds 11 ounces. In extracting the plant, about +twenty-four gallons of ether were used. It is a significant fact in +regard to the volatility of the poison that during the process of +preparing this material none of the employees engaged in the work were +in any way affected, since proper precautions were taken and the +utensils were handled with rubber gloves. + +The crude ether extract, which will be designated as the "original +material," was shipped to Baltimore in August and was kept in a cool +place until November when the investigation was begun. When the bottle +was opened, there seemed to be an escape of a vapor, and a nauseating +odor suggesting crushed green leaves pervaded the atmosphere. Some days +later, irregular red patches appeared on the face though a mask of +cotton cloth was worn during the work, and the hands were protected by +rubber gloves. + +Assuming from Pfaff's work that this original material contained the +non-volatile oil toxicodendrol, the first experiment was to try to +distil it out under diminished pressure. For this purpose, an Anschütze +distilling bulb containing ten grams of the tar was connected with a +vacuum pump. After a pressure of 2 mm. had been established the bulb was +gradually heated in a bath of Wood's metal. Nothing distilled over. The +material began to carbonize at a temperature of 140° to 150°. + +It was then thought that perhaps the oil could be converted into an +ester which might be more volatile and could be distilled out. 20 grams +of the original material were dissolved in 100 cc. of absolute alcohol +containing 3 grains of hydrochloric acid gas, and the mixture was heated +10 hours on a water-bath under a return condenser. After the heating, +the mixture had a delightful ethereal odor. The flask was corked and +left standing several weeks while other work was in progress. The ester +solution was then put in a vacuum desiccator over sulphuric acid and the +alcohol evaporated. A black, tarry, solid mass was left having the ester +odor. It was extracted with warm water and filtered from insoluble tar. +The filtrate had a green color and the ethereal odor. It was shaken out +with ether; the ether layer had a blood-red color while the water layer +was deep green. The extraction with ether was continued until the water +layer was no longer green. The combined ether extracts were evaporated +in a desiccator without heat. A black tar-like solid was left very much +like the original material, but it had the ester odor. It was partly +soluble in water and readily soluble in alcohol. The alcoholic solution +was tested on the skin and found to be not poisonous. The ester, or +mixture of esters, was not investigated further in this connection, but +was later shown to give the reactions for gallic acid and methyl +furfurol. These reactions will be referred to in connection with other +experiments. + +After a few other preliminary experiments, it became evident that the +original material was a complex mixture of substances and that it would +have to be fractionated by some means and the fractions studied +separately. + +A portion of the original substance was treated with 50 per cent. +alcohol and was found to be partly soluble in this medium. The solution +was filtered from insoluble tar. A portion of the yellow filtrate gave a +reddish yellow precipitate with lead acetate. The alcoholic solution was +distilled in an Anschütze flask under diminished pressure; a yellow +liquid condensed in the arm of the flask while most of the alcohol was +collected in a bottle connected with the arm. The yellow liquid was acid +to litmus. Water was added, the solution was shaken out with ether and +the ether was evaporated. When the small residue was completely dry, it +was a yellow solid soluble in dilute alcohol and acid to litmus. The +substance was not volatile enough to justify the use of this method for +getting it. + +Chlorophyll could not be removed from the original substance because the +solvents for chlorophyll such as alcohol, ether, fats, petroleum, and +carbon bisulphide dissolve large quantities of the mixture. + +A precipitate obtained by adding lead acetate to a filtered solution of +the original substance in 50 per cent. alcohol was suspended in water, +decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, shaken out with ether and the ether +evaporated. The residue appeared at first to be a yellow oil, but on +complete evaporation of the ether in a desiccator, a yellow solid was +obtained--apparently the same as that obtained by vacuum distillation. + +A solution of the original material in 50 per cent. alcohol was filtered +through bone-black and the filtrate was colorless. Examination showed +that everything had been removed by the bone-black and the filtrate was +apparently pure alcohol and water. + +In precipitating an alcoholic solution of the crude material with a +solution of lead acetate, it was noticed that at least two kinds of +precipitates were formed. The part that went down first was darker in +color than that thrown down later. Pfaff used the last fractions in +obtaining his oil and stated that these precipitates consisted of the +lead compound of the oil in a pure state. It was found by experiment +that the darker part was soluble in ether while the lighter part was +not. This indicated that the darker part consisted of tarry matter which +was brought down mechanically or separated out when the alcoholic +solution was diluted by the lead acetate solution, or was perhaps a lead +compound soluble in ether. To test this point an experiment was made as +follows: Some of the crude material was thoroughly extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol. The tar insoluble in 50 per cent. alcohol was then +treated with 95 per cent. alcohol; most of it dissolved; the solution +was filtered and lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol was added. A +greenish colored precipitate was formed which was filtered off and found +to be completely soluble in ether and soluble to a considerable extent +in strong alcohol. These experiments suggested that the light colored +lead compound which was thought to contain the poison could be purified +by extraction with ether in a Soxhlet apparatus more conveniently than +by the tedious process of fractional precipitation. Further preliminary +experiments showed that 50 per cent. alcohol extracted from the original +material all of the substance or substances which gave the light colored +precipitate and dissolved only a small amount of the tar. + +Two hundred and eighty-eight grams of the crude material were then +extracted several times with 50 per cent. alcohol and filtered; the +insoluble tar was washed and saved for examination. To the filtrate was +added an excess of a solution of lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol. +The large precipitate, which will be designated as "precipitate A," was +filtered and drained by suction in a Büchner funnel. The alcoholic +"filtrate A" was saved. Precipitate A was extracted with ether in +Soxhlet extractors until the ether came over practically colorless, the +operation being interrupted from time to time to stir up the precipitate +in the thimble. The green colored ether solution was saved for future +examination. The lead precipitate, after extraction with ether and +drying, weighed about 116 grams. A portion of this lead compound was +decomposed by hydrogen sulphide in a mixture of water and ether which +was well shaken during the operation. The ether was separated, filtered, +and evaporated under diminished pressure without heat, and there +remained a yellow oily looking residue having a pleasant odor. When the +ether and water were completely removed in a vacuum desiccator, a hard, +brittle, yellow resin weighing about 16 grams was obtained. It was +soluble in alcohol, had a strong acid reaction and was free from +nitrogen[16] and sulphur. The nitrogen tests were made by the Lassaign +and soda lime methods,[17] and the sulphur test was made with sodium +nitroprusside after fusing the residue with sodium. The main portion of +the lead compound was decomposed under alcohol by hydrogen sulphide, +filtered, and the alcoholic filtrate evaporated in vacuo. The same +yellow acid resin was obtained. Experiments continuing through several +weeks were made in applying solutions of this resin to rats, rabbits and +guinea pigs. Finding it to be without effect upon these animals it was +tried on the writer and found to be not poisonous.[18] In the meantime +the resin was being studied in the laboratory. + + +GALLIC ACID. + +An alcoholic solution of the resin was just neutralized with potassium +hydroxide. During the titration, the solution rapidly became dark brown. +After neutralization it was shaken with ether; the water solution +remained brown while the ether layer was nearly colorless and contained +practically no dissolved substance. A portion of the water solution of +the potassium salt on being acidified with sulphuric acid and standing +over night, deposited a slight precipitate. The solution of the +potassium salt gave a heavy precipitate with lead acetate somewhat +similar to the original lead precipitate A, and also slight precipitates +with salts of zinc, mercury, copper, and silver (with reduction). It +gave a bluish-black color with impure ferrous sulphate and a dark color +with ferric chloride. It reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate and Fehling +solution. These experiments indicated the presence of a tannin compound. +An alcoholic solution of the resin gave the same color reactions with +iron salts as did the potassium salt. To determine which one of the +tannin compounds was present was a matter of some difficulty since the +di- and tri-hydroxybenzoic acids have in general the same color +reactions. The presence of other plant substances in the solution also +interferes with the color tests, and finally, a substance which gives a +blue color with iron salts and one giving a green color may be found +together in the same plant.[19] Further tests with a solution of the +resin in dilute alcohol, and with a water solution of the acid +precipitated by adding sulphuric acid to a solution of the resin in +potassium hydroxide, led to the conclusion that the acid is gallic acid. +These tests were the following: + +(1) Boiling with an excess of potassium hydroxide gave a black substance +(tauromelanic acid). + +(2) The acid was not precipitated by gelatin. + +(3) On addition of potassium cyanide a transitory red color appeared +which reappeared on shaking with air. + +Gallic acid is distinguished from tannic acid by tests (2) and (3). At +later stages in the work the potassium, barium, and sodium salts of +gallic acid were obtained, and finally the pure acid was made by +decomposing the sodium salt with sulphuric acid and crystallizing from +water. A portion of the acid so obtained was further purified by +dissolving in absolute alcohol and pouring into absolute ether.[20] The +melting point behavior of the acid corresponds with that of gallic acid; +it melted with decomposition at about 230°. For further identification, +some of the acid was converted into an ester by the following process: +it was dissolved in 80 per cent. alcohol, hydrochloric acid gas was +passed in, and the solution was heated an hour on the water bath. It was +then evaporated to a small bulk, neutralized with barium carbonate and +extracted with ether. The ether, on evaporation, left the ester which +was crystallized from water and dried in a desiccator over sulphuric +acid. The anhydrous ester agreed in melting point (156° to 159°) and +other properties with the ester of gallic acid described by Grimaux.[21] +For the sake of comparison, an ester was made from gallic acid obtained +from another source and the two agreed in properties. A mixture of the +two esters melted within the limits given for the ester of gallic acid. + +While the tests leading to the identification of gallic acid were being +made, another series of experiments was in progress. Eleven and one-half +grams of the resin obtained from lead precipitate A by decomposition +with hydrogen sulphide were treated with 0.1 n. potassium hydroxide +added from a burette until the acid was exactly neutralized. All went +into solution. On shaking with ether, some of the potassium salt +separated out and was saved for examination. The solution became brown +on exposure to air and got darker as the work proceeded. The acid in +solution as a potassium salt was precipitated out in four fractions by +adding for each fraction one-fourth the amount of 0.1 n. sulphuric acid +required to neutralize the potassium hydroxide used. The precipitates +were filtered off and examined. The first was small in amount, gummy and +hard to filter. The solution was shaken with ether after each +precipitate had been filtered off. The succeeding precipitates were in +better condition, but were not pure. All appeared to be impure gallic +acid which had become brown by absorption of oxygen. They were saved, +however, to be tested for poison. After the last fraction had separated, +the filtrate was shaken several times with ether and saved for further +examination, which will be described under "Rhamnose." This filtrate is +designated as B. + +At this stage of the work a portion of the resin obtained from lead +precipitate A was tested and found to be not poisonous as already +mentioned. By this test, all the substances contained in the lead +precipitate A after its extraction with ether in the Soxhlet apparatus, +were eliminated from the possible poisonous substances. The poison must +therefore have been extracted by the ether. + +A fresh portion of the original poisonous material was treated with 50 +per cent. alcohol and filtered from insoluble tar. The filtrate was +precipitated in six fractions by lead acetate. The last fractions were +lighter in color and apparently much purer than the first. The sixth +lead precipitate was decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, the light-yellow +water solution was tested and found to be not poisonous. It gave the +characteristic reactions for gallic acid. The poison, if precipitated at +all by lead acetate, must have gone down in one of the preceding +fractions. Later experiments showed that it is brought down partly +mechanically and partly as a lead compound in the first precipitates. + + +FISETIN. + +Having identified gallic acid, and not finding any other phenol +derivative in the lead precipitate, some of the original material was +extracted with hot water to remove gallic acid and filtered from tar +while hot. The filtrate had a deep yellow color. On cooling over night, +an olive green precipitate separated out which was dried and found to be +a light powder. It was practically insoluble in cold water, soluble +with great difficulty in boiling water from which it separated in yellow +flakes, slightly soluble in ether and in acetic acid, but readily +soluble in alcohol. The solutions were not acid to litmus, gave a dark +color with ferric chloride, an orange-red precipitate with lead acetate +which was easily soluble in acetic acid, and an orange-yellow +precipitate with stannous chloride. These properties and reactions +indicated that the substance was the dye-stuff fisetin and that it +occurs in the free state in this plant though it is usually found as a +glucoside of fisetin combined with tannic acid. A compound of this kind +was found in _Rhus cotinus_ and named "fustin-tannide" by Schmid[22]. He +showed that the fustin-tannide could be decomposed by acetic acid into +tannic acid and a glucoside, fustin C_{46}H_{42}O_{21}. Fustin, on +heating with dilute sulphuric acid, gave fisetin and a sugar supposed to +be rhamnose. Fisetin was also found as a glucoside compound in _Rhus +rhodanthema_ by Perkin.[23] + +The yellow substance which separated from the boiling water solution was +further purified by dissolving in a small quantity of hot alcohol and +adding hot water. On cooling, the yellow substance separated out in a +flocculent condition. Examined under the microscope, the flakes appeared +to be made up of masses of fine crystals. + +An alcoholic solution of the substance gave a black color with ammonia +which became red on addition of more ammonia. Concentrated acids +intensified the yellow color of the alcoholic solution. Fehling solution +and ammoniacal silver nitrate were reduced by it. Potassium hydroxide +added to an alcoholic solution gave at first a deep red color +accompanied by a green fluorescence which disappeared, leaving a yellow +liquid. With an excess of caustic potash, the red color returned and was +permanent. These reactions are characteristic for fisetin.[24] + +Furthermore, fisetin should give protocatechuic acid and phloroglucinol +by fusion with caustic potash under proper conditions.[25] The +experiment was carried out as follows: 2 grams of fisetin were gently +heated in a nickel crucible with 6 grams of caustic potash dissolved in +6 cc. water. An inflammable gas, apparently hydrogen, was evolved during +the fusion. The pasty mass was dissolved in water, acidified with +sulphuric acid, and filtered. The filtrate was shaken out with ether +containing one-fourth its volume of alcohol. The ether was evaporated +and the residue was extracted with warm water and filtered. Lead acetate +was added to the filtrate to precipitate protocatechuic acid, while +phloroglucinol remained in the filtrate from this precipitate. The lead +precipitate was suspended in water, decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, +filtered, and evaporated to obtain protocatechuic acid. That the +substance obtained was protocatechuic acid was shown by the following +characteristic tests: + +(1) It gave a greenish brown color with ferric chloride; on addition of +one drop of a dilute solution of sodium carbonate, the color became dark +blue; on adding more sodium carbonate the color became red. + +(2) A violet color was obtained when a solution of the acid was treated +with a drop of sodium carbonate solution and then with a drop of ferrous +sulphate. + +(3) It reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate. + +(4) It did not reduce Fehling solution. + +The filtrate supposed to contain phloroglucinol was treated with +hydrogen sulphide to remove lead, filtered, and shaken with ether. The +residue left on evaporating the ether was taken up in water. This +solution gave the following reactions characteristic for phloroglucinol: + +(1) It reduced both silver nitrate and Fehling solution. + +(2) It colored pine wood moistened with hydrochloric acid red. + +(3) It gave a red color with vanillin and hydrochloric acid, and + +(4) A deeper red color with oil of cloves and hydrochloric acid, +becoming purple on standing. + +(5) It gave a violet color with ferric chloride. + +The substance is then, without doubt, fisetin. The formula[26] of +fisetin is supposed to be C_{15}H_{10}O_{6}. + + +RHAMNOSE. + +It was stated above that Schmid obtained a sugar solution by the +decomposition of a fisetin-glucoside from _Rhus cotinus_, and Perkin +obtained the same from a glucoside in _Rhus rhodanthema_. These +investigators thought that the sugar was isodulcite or rhamnose, but +they did not isolate it on account of the small quantities of material +at their disposal. Moreover, the sugar is very hard to crystallize in +the presence of other soluble substances and is not found in large +quantity in plants. Maquenne[27] could obtain only 15 to 20 gm. of +rhamnose by working up 1 kilogram of the berries of _Rhamnus +infectorius_. Assuming that the free fisetin found in poison ivy leaves +had its origin in the decomposition of a fisetin-glucoside by natural +processes, it was reasonable to suppose that the sugar would also be +found in the free state, although, according to Roscoe and +Schorlemmer:[28] "Isodulcite does not occur in the free state in nature, +but is found as a peculiar ethereal salt belonging to the class of +glucosides. On boiling with dilute sulphuric acid, this splits up into +isodulcite and other bodies...." The more recent works on the sugars and +on plant chemistry[29] mention the occurrence of rhamnose only in the +glucoside form, with one possible exception. The exception referred to +is the occurrence of a free sugar, supposed to be rhamnose, in a certain +palm-wine.[30] Czapek says:[31] "The well-known methyl pentoses do not +occur in the free state in plant organisms so far as we know." + +Since rhamnose forms a lead compound, the sugar, if present, should be +found in the first lead precipitate, A, and also in filtrate A in case +it is not completely precipitated in the presence of acetic acid and +alcohol. + +The filtrate A (about two liters) was examined first. It had a light +yellow color, contained an excess of lead acetate, and was acid from the +acetic acid liberated in the precipitation of the lead compound A.[32] +This filtrate was evaporated to dryness under diminished pressure to +remove alcohol, water, and acetic acid. The clear distillate had a +peculiar odor suggesting both tea and amyl formate. It was saved for +examination and was found to be not poisonous. The residue in the dish +after evaporation was a tough reddish brown, gummy mass which could be +drawn out into fine threads. It had a pleasant sweet odor. It was +extracted several times with hot water, each portion being filtered. A +brownish yellow powder remained undissolved and was saved. The combined +filtrates deposited more of the yellow solid on standing. This powder +will be referred to later as "P." The filtered liquid was freed from +lead by hydrogen sulphide. The solution then had a lemon yellow color, a +sweet odor and was acid from acetic acid. On concentrating the solution +by evaporation and making a small portion of it alkaline with sodium +hydroxide, the yellow color came out very intense[33]. The alkaline +solution reduced Fehling solution and ammoniacal silver nitrate, +indicating the presence of a sugar. Another portion of the solution gave +a slight precipitate with phenyl hydrazine in the cold. The remainder of +the solution was evaporated to dryness, extracted with water, filtered, +and again evaporated. A dark sticky syrup was left which was only partly +soluble in water. This was treated with water, filtered, and the +filtrate was evaporated, the water being replaced from time to time to +remove acetic acid. Finally the liquid gave the following tests for +rhamnose, besides those already mentioned: + +(1) With alpha-naphthol[34] and sulphuric acid, a purple violet +color. + +(2) With thymol[35] and sulphuric acid, a red color. + +(3) With resorcinol[36] and sulphuric acid, red color. + +(4) With orcinol[37] and hydrochloric acid, red color. + +(5) With ammonium picrate and sodium picrate, yellowish red color. + +(6) With phloroglucinol and hydrochloric acid, red color. + +(7) It decolorized an alkaline solution of potassium ferricyanide. + +(8) It gave a white precipitate with lead acetate. + +The filtrate B (p. 20) from which gallic acid was precipitated by +sulphuric acid in four fractions was saved to examine for sugar. To +remove gallic acid completely, and other vegetable matter, it was shaken +out several times with ether, and was kept at a low temperature with +salt and ice for a long time. It was left standing for several weeks, +during which time more brown matter separated out and was filtered off. +The filtrate was evaporated to a small bulk, cooled, and filtered from +crystals of potassium sulphate. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness, +the residue taken up in water and filtered through bone-black. Addition +of alcohol caused complete precipitation of potassium sulphate. The +solution then gave the above mentioned characteristic tests for +rhamnose. + +All attempts to get the osazone of the sugar by the method of +Fischer[38] failed, probably on account of the small quantity of the +sugar present. The plant, it will be remembered, was originally +extracted with ether in which rhamnose is practically insoluble. The +above described tests, however, can leave no doubt as to the identity of +the sugar. + +Additional evidence that the sugar is rhamnose was obtained by a method +described by Maquenne[39] as follows: + + "The production of methyl furfurol in the dehydration of + isodulcite furnishes a very simple means of characterizing + this sugar in mixtures which contain it; it is sufficient, + for example, to distil 50 gm. of quercitron wood with as + much sulphuric acid and about 150 gm. of water, then to + rectify the liquid obtained in order to get several drops of + the crude furfurol, which on addition of alcohol and + concentrated sulphuric acid gives immediately the green + coloration characteristic of methyl furfurol. This procedure + is applicable to extracts as well as to entire plants, and + has the advantage that it does not require the separation of + isodulcite, the crystallization of which is often very slow + and at times impossible when it is mixed with other very + soluble substances." + +The experiment was tried with the crude ether extract of the plant +according to the directions of Maquenne, and the green color with +alcohol and sulphuric acid was obtained from the thicker oily portion of +the distillate. This test can be made with hydrochloric acid[40] as well +as with sulphuric. Therefore the color test was tried with the ester +mixture prepared in one of the early experiments by boiling the original +plant material with hydrochloric acid and alcohol. Methyl furfurol was +found here also, this method indeed giving better results than that of +Maquenne. + +The presence of free rhamnose has thus been shown in the original +material, in the first precipitate by lead acetate, and in the filtrate +from this precipitate. Experiments to be described under "The Poison" +showed that the ether extract from the Soxhlet apparatus contained a +substance which yielded rhamnose when hydrolyzed by dilute sulphuric +acid. + +The presence of free gallic acid, fisetin, and rhamnose in the plant can +be readily explained by a series of assumptions for which there is a +considerable amount of experimental evidence. There is reason to believe +that tannin-like bodies are formed at the expense of chlorophyll,[41] +that complex tannin bodies can be broken down by acetic acid (also found +in _Rhus toxicodendron_) into a tannic acid and a glucoside (for +example, the "fustin-tannide" mentioned above yields tannic acid and +fisetin-glucoside); and finally that the glucoside can be hydrolyzed by +acids or enzymes giving, in the sumach plants, fisetin and rhamnose. + +Nitrogenous ferments which can effect the hydrolysis of glucosides and +give rise to sugars are frequently found in plants, for example, emulsin +in almonds, myrosin in mustard, and erythrozym in madder. Acree and +Hinkins[42] found that diastase, pancreatin, and a number of other +enzymes cause hydrolysis of triacetyl glucose with the formation of +glucose and acetic acid. Stevens[43] obtained a nitrogenous oxidizing +enzyme from _Rhus vernicifera_. The close relationship between the +poisonous species of _Rhus_ would lead us to suppose that the same +soluble ferment exists in poison ivy, though it was not detected in the +original material used in these experiments, probably because the plant +was extracted with ether in which the enzyme is insoluble. The existence +of such a soluble ferment would explain the presence of free sugar and +free fisetin. + + +EVIDENCE OF THE PRESENCE OF A FATTY ACID IN FILTRATE A. + +The brown substance P, obtained from filtrate A by evaporation and +extracting the residue with hot water, was suspended in warm water and +dilute sulphuric was added. A white precipitate was formed and a strong +fatty acid odor was developed. After the mixture had been heated for +some hours on the water bath a small portion was made alkaline and it +reduced Fehling solution. The main solution was filtered and the +precipitate supposed to be a fatty acid was saved. The filtrate was +neutralized with barium carbonate, filtered, evaporated, freed from +caramel, and the solution then gave the tests mentioned above for +rhamnose. + +A portion of the precipitate supposed to be a fatty acid was ignited in +a porcelain spoon. It fused, carbonized, and burned. The remainder was +heated with alcoholic potash and reprecipitated with hydrochloric acid. +The precipitate was washed and heated with alcohol. Part of it +dissolved. The insoluble part was found to be a lead compound. On +boiling it with hydrochloric acid and cooling, lead chloride +crystallized out. This was confirmed by dissolving the lead chloride in +hot water and precipitating as lead sulphide. These experiments were not +carried farther on account of the small quantity of material, but they +show that the gummy substance obtained from filtrate A contained +rhamnose (either as a lead compound of free sugar or as a lead compound +of a rhamnoside), and also, most probably, the lead compound of an +organic acid.[44] + + +THE FRAGRANT DISTILLATE. + +Several times in the course of this work, extracts of the original plant +material in alcohol and in water were distilled under diminished +pressure for the purpose of concentrating the solutions. The distillate, +in every case, had an ethereal odor suggesting amyl formate in very +dilute solution, but was more fragrant. The distillate from a water +extract was examined. It was a clear liquid, a little darker than pure +water, was not poisonous, was neutral to litmus paper, gave no color +with ferric chloride, reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate, but not Fehling +solution, and gave a faint red color with dilute ammonium hydroxide and +with sodium carbonate. + +A small quantity of a finely divided black precipitate separated out +from the water distillate on standing. + +The substance with the fragrant odor was extracted by shaking the +distillate with ether and letting the ether evaporate spontaneously. A +very small quantity of a yellow solid was deposited on the sides of the +dish. This substance had a strong and persistent odor, so sweet as to be +almost nauseating. Not enough was obtained for examination or analysis. +This fragrant residue was difficultly soluble in water and the solution +reduced silver nitrate in ammonia. A steam distillate of the original +plant material had the same fragrant odor as the distillate from a water +extract. + + +THE POISON. + +288 grams of the original poisonous material were extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol, and this alcoholic solution was precipitated with lead +acetate in the manner already described (p. 17). The lead precipitate so +obtained was extracted with ether in Soxhlet extractors and after the +extraction was found by test to be free from poison. Therefore the +poison, if precipitated by the lead acetate, must have been extracted by +the ether. This ether solution had a dark green color, and was acid from +acetic acid brought down in the lead precipitate. The ether was +evaporated in a vacuum desiccator without heat and there remained a +small quantity of an acid mixture of water and a soft tar; the watery +part was colored green, showing that the tar was soluble to some extent +in dilute acetic acid. The mixture had the peculiar odor of the original +material. A small drop of the green watery part was applied to the +wrist, allowed to remain a few minutes and was then removed by absorbent +paper, but the spot was not washed. Itching and reddening of the skin +commenced within twenty-four hours. At the end of forty-eight hours, +there was a well developed case of poisoning. How this was cured will be +described in another place. + +A small portion of the poisonous mixture was dissolved in alcohol, and +this solution was divided into three parts. The first part was treated +with ferric chloride, but it gave no color reaction. Another portion of +the alcoholic solution was diluted with water. It became turbid. The +third portion gave a dirty-green precipitate with lead acetate, which +seemed to come down more readily when the solution was diluted with +water. The main portion of the poisonous mixture was then dissolved in +95 per cent. alcohol and lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol was added. +The precipitate was filtered, washed, and decomposed by hydrogen +sulphide in a mixture of water and ether. The ether solution was +filtered and evaporated. The residue was a tar which, on standing in a +desiccator for some time, became dry enough to break into sticky lumps. +An alcoholic solution of this substance gave a dark color with ferric +chloride and a light colored precipitate with lead acetate. + +To get more of the poisonous tar for study, 233 grams of original +material were extracted with 95 per cent. alcohol. Strong alcohol was +used in order to dissolve as much of the tar as possible. The solution +had a dark greenish color, but was somewhat yellow in thin layers. The +undissolved tar was filtered off and extracted twice again in the same +way. The tar left after the third extraction was only slightly soluble +in alcohol, and its solution was not poisonous. The three filtrates from +these three extractions were precipitated separately by lead acetate in +50 per cent. alcohol. The first precipitate was largest, darkest in +color, and carried down more tarry matter. The second was light green, +and the third was quite small, black, and was not a lead compound at +all, but some of the tar which separated out on diluting the strong +alcohol with the weaker grade containing lead acetate. It was soluble in +ether and less soluble in alcohol. The alcoholic solution of this third +lot gave no precipitate with hydrogen sulphide. The first and second +lead precipitates were filtered by suction and washed with water. They +were kept a day or two in a desiccator over sulphuric acid, but did not +become completely dry. The weight of these two moist precipitates +together was 172 grams. They were combined and extracted with ether in +Soxhlet extractors which were kept in operation during work hours for +three days. + +In the meantime the alcoholic filtrates from these lead precipitates +were combined and concentrated on the water bath by distilling off two +liters of alcohol. The alcohol obtained had the peculiar odor of the +original material, but was not poisonous. + +After a long extraction of the lead precipitate in the Soxhlet +extractors, the green ether solutions were combined and washed by +shaking them with water to remove lead acetate and acetic acid in case +any should have been held in the lead precipitate. The ether was +distilled off at a low temperature and there remained a soft tar, a +portion of which was not completely soluble in 95 per cent. alcohol. The +alcoholic solution had a greenish yellow color and was poisonous. The +tar was also partly soluble in acetic acid, and this solution was found +to contain lead. Thinking that the lead acetate had not been completely +washed out, the main part of the tar was dissolved in ether and shaken +with water. The wash water continued to give a test for lead as long as +the washing was continued. This indicated probably the hydrolysis of an +unstable lead compound. Hydrogen sulphide was passed into the ether +solution mixed with water to remove the lead. Lead sulphide was filtered +off, and the ether was evaporated. A small portion of the tar residue in +alcoholic solution gave a color reaction with ferric chloride. As this +may have been due to traces of lead gallate dissolved in the extraction +with ether and afterwards decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, the main +portion of the tar was redissolved in ether and shaken with water until +it no longer reacted with ferric chloride. The ether was then evaporated +and a soft, black, poisonous tar or gum of uniform consistency was left +which was shown by tests to be free from gallic acid and lead. These +experiments showed that some of the poison was precipitated as a lead +compound soluble in ether and some was brought down mechanically in the +free state. To see if the extraction with ether in the Soxhlet apparatus +was complete, the residue in the thimbles was decomposed by hydrogen +sulphide and shaken with ether. The dark colored ether solution was +freed from gallic acid by shaking with water and dilute sodium carbonate +solution, and was evaporated. A small quantity of tar was obtained which +was added to the main portion. + +A solution of the poisonous tar in 95 per cent. alcohol did not reduce +Fehling solution and did not give a precipitate with lead acetate except +the separation of a small quantity of tar, which was not a lead +compound. The lead compound of the poison was apparently soluble in 95 +per cent. alcohol as well as in ether, for it would not precipitate in +this medium, although it was found in the original precipitate by lead +acetate. The alcoholic solution of the tar became turbid on diluting +with water. + +In order to see if the poison is volatile with vapor of acetic acid, +since this acid is found in the plant and it is thought by some that the +poison is volatile, a portion of the tar was distilled under diminished +pressure with acetic acid. It was soluble to some extent in the acid. +The temperature did not go higher than 55° during the distillation. A +tube containing cotton wet with sweet oil was placed between the +receiver and the water suction so that the uncondensed vapors would have +to pass through the cotton. This cotton was rubbed on the skin and was +not poisonous. The yellow distillate collected in the receiver was also +tested and was not poisonous. + + +HYDROLYSIS OF THE POISON. + +About 5 grams of the poisonous tar free from gallic acid and sugar was +dissolved in alcohol, and dilute (2 per cent.) sulphuric acid was added. +Some of the tar separated out on diluting the alcohol with the acid. The +mixture was heated on a water bath during work hours for four days. A +purple and green fluorescent solution was formed, though much tar was +left apparently unchanged. The alcohol was evaporated off and the +solution was filtered from tar. The fluorescent filtrate was shaken +with ether, by which the green substance was removed, leaving the +solution purple. The ether left, on evaporation, a small quantity of a +green substance having a pleasant ester odor. It was not further +examined. A portion of the purple solution was exactly neutralized with +sodium carbonate. This solution gave a blue-black color with ferric +chloride which became red on addition of another drop of sodium +carbonate, indicating gallic acid. It also reduced Fehling solution. + +Another portion of the purple solution was made alkaline with sodium +carbonate. A reddish-brown flocculent precipitate was formed and was +filtered off. The filtrate did not give any color with ferric chloride, +but it reduced Fehling solution. It also gave the test for rhamnose with +alpha-naphthol. + +The main portion of the purple solution was made alkaline with sodium +carbonate; the precipitate was filtered off and dissolved in acetic +acid. This solution was yellow and gave a reaction with ferric chloride +similar to that of gallic acid. The filtrate from the precipitate by +sodium carbonate was concentrated by evaporation until sodium sulphate +began to crystallize out. Alcohol was added to precipitate the sodium +sulphate completely, the mixture was heated and filtered. The alcoholic +filtrate was concentrated to a syrup which reduced Fehling solution and +gave the characteristic tests for rhamnose already described. By this +hydrolysis, the tar was split up into rhamnose and some form of gallic +acid which could be precipitated by sodium carbonate. This compound, +whose acetic acid solution was yellow, probably contained fisetin also. +The reason for this last statement will appear from the following +experiment: + + +DECOMPOSITION OF THE POISON WITH ACETIC ACID. + +A portion of the poisonous tar was heated in an open dish with strong +acetic acid. The tar seemed to be decomposed to some extent, giving a +yellow substance. Acetic acid was added from time to time as it +evaporated. After several evaporations, water was added, the mixture was +heated to boiling and filtered. This filtrate No. 1 will be mentioned +later. The residue in the dish consisted of undecomposed tar and an +olive-green flaky substance. This substance was heated with a fresh +portion of glacial acetic acid. Water was added, and the mixture was +boiled and filtered. The filtrate had a deep yellow color suggesting +fisetin. It was shaken out with ethyl acetate which became colored +yellow. A portion of the ethyl acetate solution gave an orange red +precipitate with lead acetate showing the presence of fisetin. The ethyl +acetate was removed from the remainder of the solution by evaporation +and the yellow residue was taken up in alcohol. This alcoholic solution +gave the characteristic reactions for fisetin with stannous chloride, +with potassium hydroxide, with ferric chloride and with Fehling +solution. + +Filtrate No. 1 obtained by heating the poisonous tar with acetic acid +and hot water as described above was investigated as follows: A portion +of it gave a reddish colored precipitate with sodium carbonate as in the +case when the tar was hydrolyzed with sulphuric acid. The remainder was +nearly neutralized with sodium carbonate and lead acetate was added in +excess to remove gallic acid. The excess of lead was removed by +sulphuric acid, and the sulphuric acid was removed by barium carbonate. +The solution on evaporation reduced Fehling solution to some extent, but +a white precipitate was also formed. + +In this experiment, gallic acid and fisetin and probably sugar were +formed by decomposition of the poisonous gum with acetic acid, the acid +found in the plant by Pfaff. The presence of free gallic acid, fisetin +and rhamnose in the plant can therefore be explained by the natural +hydrolysis of a complex gum or tar or a constituent thereof. The +poisonous property is lost in the general rearrangement which takes +place during hydrolysis. + +The poisonous tar was not hydrolyzed by boiling with a dilute solution +of sodium carbonate. + +It was found, as has been stated elsewhere, that the lead compound of +the poison could not be precipitated in 95 per cent. alcohol. Further +experiments, however, showed that on extracting the poisonous gum with +50 per cent. alcohol, a portion of it dissolved, and this solution gave +a precipitate with lead acetate which was a true lead compound. The +remainder of the purified tar (about 10 gm.) was treated with 50 per +cent. alcohol and filtered. Very little dissolved in alcohol of this +strength, but on addition of lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol to the +solution, a light colored precipitate was formed, which became dark on +standing. It was filtered off, washed free from lead acetate, decomposed +by hydrogen sulphide, and shaken out with ether. The ether left, on +evaporation, a yellow resinous substance having a faint odor like +garlic. By drying in a desiccator, a small quantity of a solid yellow +resin was obtained which was completely soluble in alcohol. A very small +drop of this solution applied to the skin on the end of a glass rod +which had been drawn out to a point caused an eruption in about +thirty-six hours. Following the nomenclature used by Maisch and Pfaff, +this substance will be designated as _Toxicodendrin_, the ending "in" +indicating its glucoside nature. + +The filtrate from the lead precipitate just described was freed from the +excess of lead acetate by hydrogen sulphide, was tested for poison, and +was found to be poisonous, showing that the precipitation by lead +acetate was not complete even in 50 per cent. alcohol. On spontaneous +evaporation of the solution, a yellow, sweet smelling resin was left. + +A portion of the alcoholic solution of the toxicodendrin gave a dark +coloration with ferric chloride, did not reduce Fehling solution and was +slightly acid to litmus. + +To see whether the toxicodendrin could be hydrolyzed, the remainder was +dissolved in alcohol and dilute sulphuric acid was added. A fine, white +precipitate was formed at once which rose to the surface on standing as +a light flocculent substance. The mixture was heated for several days on +a water bath, filtered from unhydrolyzed resin and the filtrate was +neutralized and concentrated in the way already described. The solution +obtained reduced Fehling solution. Not enough was obtained for further +sugar tests, but all the hydrolysis experiments point to the conclusion +that the poisonous substance is a rhamnoside, and is the source of the +sugar in the plant. + +The reaction with ferric chloride observed whenever a lead compound of +the poison is decomposed by hydrogen sulphide may be explained by the +formation of traces of gallic acid or fisetin through the action of the +weak acids present. + +The supply of purified poisonous tar having been exhausted in the +preceding experiments, further study of the active principle is +postponed until more can be prepared. It is highly desirable to +investigate the white precipitate formed by addition of sulphuric acid +to an alcoholic solution of the toxicodendrin. + + +OXIDATION OF THE PURIFIED TAR WITH NITRIC ACID. + +When the purified poisonous material (p. 32) was extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol, only a small quantity was dissolved as was stated above. +The insoluble residue was treated with fuming nitric acid. Violent +reaction took place at once with copious evolution of red fumes and +heat. When the reaction was over, a sticky red gummy mass was left which +was slightly soluble in cold water and readily soluble in warm alcohol. +The water extract was yellow, and the alcoholic solution was red. That +the water extract contained picric acid was shown by the following +experiments: + + (1) A portion was gently warmed with a few drops of a strong + solution of potassium cyanide and two drops of sodium + hydroxide. The red color of potassium isopurpurate was + formed. + + (2) A portion of the water solution was heated with glucose + and a few drops of sodium hydroxide. The deep red color of + picraminic acid was produced. + + (3) A few drops of an ammoniacal solution of copper sulphate + was added to the water extract. A yellow-green precipitate + was formed. + + (4) The water extract dyed silk, but did not dye cotton + cloth. + + +DISTILLATION OF THE TAR WITH SODA LIME. + +About 25 gm. of the tar left after extracting the original material with +hot water was dissolved in ether and poured into a glass retort +containing soda lime. The ether was distilled out, leaving the tar +intimately mixed with the soda lime. The retort was then gradually +heated. Vapors and liquid were given off, both of which turned red +litmus blue and had a strong odor like tobacco smoke. No odor of ammonia +was detected.[45] At the high temperature of the triple burner, a +semi-solid, red, greasy substance collected in and closed the condenser +tube. This substance had the same powerful odor as the liquid portion of +the distillate. The clear, watery portion of the distillate was +separated from the thicker parts, and was found to contain pyrrol and +pyridine derivatives by the following characteristic tests: + + (1) Wood moistened with hydrochloric acid was turned red by + it. + + (2) Colorless fumes were formed when brought near + hydrochloric acid; mixed with hydrochloric acid, a red + insoluble substance was formed. + + (3) It precipitated the hydroxides of iron, gave a light + blue precipitate with copper sulphate, and a white + precipitate with mercuric chloride. + +The greasy, semi-solid mass was extracted with 10 per cent. hydrochloric +acid and filtered. On addition of a solution of mercuric chloride to the +red filtrate, a brown flocculent precipitate was formed. It was filtered +off and distilled with caustic soda, but the distillate did not contain +pyridine. + + +POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE AS A REMEDY FOR RHUS POISONING.[46] + +In the early stages of this work some experiments were made to see if +potassium permanganate could be used to purify the lead precipitate by +oxidizing the tar brought down in precipitation. It was found that the +permanganate attacked the lead precipitate as well as the other organic +matter in the vessel. This fact and the well-known value of permanganate +in treating skin diseases, its use as an antidote for some kinds of +alkaloid poisoning,[47] as an antidote given to cattle poisoned by +plants,[48] and as an antidote for snake bites,[49] suggested its use as +a remedy for Rhus poisoning. Maisch[50] mentioned that he had used it +with success, but it never came into general use, probably on account of +its staining the skin and clothing. In carrying out this work abundant +opportunities for testing its value as a remedy for the dermatitis +caused by poison ivy were afforded by many cases of accidental and +intentional poisoning. The best example of the latter was obtained with +the ether solution from the extraction of the lead precipitate in the +Soxhlet apparatus (page 28). After removing the ether, a small drop of +the residue was applied to the wrist as described. An itching red spot +about the size of a dime was noticed in thirty-six hours, and it +steadily increased in size. Nearly two days after the application of the +poison, a dilute solution of potassium permanganate containing a little +caustic potash was rubbed into the spot until the pimples were +destroyed. A little black spot was left wherever there had been a +pimple, showing that the permanganate had been reduced to oxide in the +skin. The place was washed and nothing more was thought of it until the +morning following, when it was noticed that the wrist had commenced to +swell during the night, and the characteristic watery secretion was +running from the poisoned spot. More permanganate solution was applied +without potash and the wrist was bandaged, thinking that this would +prevent the spreading of the eruption, but it really facilitated +spreading by becoming saturated with the poisonous fluid and keeping it +in contact with a larger surface of skin. In the meantime the swelling +and inflammation had extended nearly to the elbow. The arm now had the +appearance of having been bitten by a snake. To reduce the swelling it +was immersed in hot water. This seemed to bring out the eruption very +quickly and the blisters were treated with permanganate as fast as they +appeared. The swelling was reduced, but returned during the night. On +the evening following, the forearm was immersed in a bowl of hot +permanganate solution containing a little caustic potash. The solution +was kept as hot as could be borne for about half an hour. After this +bath, the poison was completely oxidized, for the swelling was reduced +and did not return, nor was there any fresh eruption. What appeared to +be a severe case of poisoning was thus cured very quickly. The use of +hot water not only reduces the swelling, but also helps to destroy the +poison. The action of permanganate is also more rapid at high +temperatures. + +The oxidizing power of permanganate, as is well known, is greater in +acid solution than in alkaline, five atoms of oxygen being available in +the former and three in the latter, according to these equations: + + 2 KMnO_{4} + 3 H_{2}SO_{4} = K_{2}SO_{4} + 2 MnSO_{4} + 3 H_{2}O + 5 O. + 2 KMnO_{4} + H_{2}O = 2 MnO_{2} + 2 KOH + 3 O. + +Permanganate was used as a remedy in some cases mixed with dilute +sulphuric acid, and in others, with zinc sulphate; also with lime water. +It was found to be satisfactory whether used alone or with any of the +substances mentioned, provided it was well rubbed into the skin. The +concentration of the solution used was varied according to the location +and condition of the eruption. Where the skin was thin or already +broken, dilute solutions (one per cent.) were used. In one case, the +eruption appeared in the palm of the hand where the skin was so thick +that it was necessary to open it before the remedies could reach the +poison. The difficulty of getting the remedy in contact with the poison +in the skin is the reason why the eruption is hard to cure. + +The remedy most commonly used for this eruption is an alcoholic solution +of lead acetate. This remedy is unsatisfactory for the reason that its +action consists in depositing an unstable lead compound of the poison in +the skin where the conditions of moisture and temperature are favorable +for its decomposition, liberating the poison with all its irritant +properties. Moreover, alcoholic preparations should not be used because +the alcohol dissolves the poison and, on evaporation, leaves it spread +over a larger surface like a varnish. Potassium permanganate, however, +oxidizes the poison completely. The only objection to the use of +permanganate of which the writer is aware is that it stains the skin. +The stain can be removed by vigorous scrubbing with soap, or it will +wear off gradually in a few days. It can be removed at once by certain +acids, but these should not be used by persons not familiar with their +action. + +With the knowledge of the facts mentioned, many solutions were tested +for poison by applying them to the skin, and when an eruption appeared, +it was cured quickly and permanently by rubbing in a permanganate +solution, usually mixed with dilute sulphuric acid. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[16] Nitrogen was found very readily by the soda lime test in the tar +left after extracting the original material with 50 per cent. alcohol, +but was not found by the Lassaign test. + +[17] Stevens. Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 255, June, 1905. + +[18] Whenever it is stated in this paper that a solution was poisonous +or not poisonous, the test was made by the writer upon himself. + +[19] Liebig's Annalen, CXI, p. 215. + +[20] Über Mategerbstoff, p. 20. + +[21] Bull. Soc. Chim. (II), Vol. 2, 95 (1864). + +[22] Berichte 19, 1735 (1886). + +[23] Jour. Chem. Soc. 71, 1194 (1897). + +[24] Berichte 19, 1740. + +[25] Ibid. 1747; Annalen, 112, 97. + +[26] Biochem. Pflan. II, 521. + +[27] Ann. de Chim. et de Phys., 6th Series, XXII, 76 (1891). + +[28] Treatise on Chem., Vol. III, Pt. III, 492. + +[29] Les Sucres; Chem. der Zuck.; Biochem. der Pflan. + +[30] Chem. Zeit. 23, Rep. 177. + +[31] Loc. cit. 1, 209. + +[32] On standing several weeks, a small quantity of tar separated out on +the walls of the vessel, also a brown precipitate which was filtered +off, suspended in water, and hydrogen sulphide was being passed in when +an accident occurred and it was lost. + +[33] "By warming with alkalies or barium hydroxide, rhamnose is colored +yellow." Chem. der Zuck. I, 177. + +[34] Ibid. 188. + +[35] Ibid. + +[36] Rayman, Sur L'Isodulcite, _Bull. Soc. Chim._ 47, 668 (1887). + +[37] Acides Gummiques. + +[38] Berichte XX, pp. 1089, 1091, 1188, 2566. + +[39] Ann. de Chim. et de Phys. (6) XXII, 93 (1891). + +[40] Biochem. der Pflan. I, 210. + +[41] Comptes rendus CXV, 892. + +[42] Amer. Chem. Jour. 28, 370. + +[43] Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 255 (June, 1905); 78, 53 (Feb., 1906). + +[44] A wax obtained from _Rhus succedanea_ was shown by Stahmer to +contain palmitic acid and glycerol in the form of glycerol palmitate. +_Annalen_ 43, 343, (1842). + +[45] See Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 256. + +[46] This section is added in the hope that it may be of use to others +who are subject to this form of poisoning. + +[47] Moor, N. Y. Med. Rec. 45 (1894), 200. + +[48] Bull. No. 26, U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. of Bot. 47. + +[49] Lacerda, Comptes rendus 93 (1881) 466-469. + +[50] Amer. Jour. Med. Sci. 52 (1866), 285. + + + + +SUMMARY. + + +Leaves and flowers of the poison ivy plant were extracted with ether and +the ether was removed by evaporation. In the residue, the following +substances were found and studied: gallic acid, fisetin, the sugar +rhamnose, and a poisonous tar, gum, or wax. + +The lead compound of the poison was soluble in ether; this fact gave a +means of separating the poisonous substance from the non-poisonous +matter in one operation. + +The poison was not volatile with vapor of acetic acid, or with vapor of +alcohol. + +The poisonous tar or wax was decomposed by acids and yielded gallic +acid, fisetin, and rhamnose, showing the probable source of these +compounds in the plant, and indicating that the poison is a complex +substance of a glucoside nature. + +It was found that a portion of the poisonous substance could be +precipitated by lead acetate from a solution of the purified tar in 50 +per cent. alcohol. + +All cases of poisoning developed on the writer were easily cured with +potassium permanganate. + +The following method is suggested for obtaining the poisonous substance +from the plant: Extract the plant with alcohol, filter, and precipitate +at once with lead acetate. Wash the precipitate, dry, and extract with +ether in Soxhlet extractors (loosely filled). Combine the ether +extracts, mix with water, and pass in hydrogen sulphide. Separate the +water and the ether solution, and filter the latter. Wash the ether +solution thoroughly by shaking with water, and then evaporate at a low +temperature. + + + + +BIOGRAPHY. + + +William Anderson Syme, the author of this dissertation, was born in +Raleigh, N. C., on July 11, 1879. He was prepared for college at the +Raleigh Male Academy, entered the North Carolina College of Agriculture +and Mechanic Arts in 1896, and was graduated in 1899 with the degree B. +S. He was an Instructor in Chemistry at the same College from January +1st, 1900, until June, 1903, when he received the degree M. S. for +graduate work. In October following, he entered Johns Hopkins University +as a graduate student in Chemistry, and was awarded one of the North +Carolina Scholarships. His minor subjects are Physical Chemistry and +Biology. + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy +Plant: (Rhus Toxicodendron), by William Anderson Syme + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SOME CONSTITUENTS--POISON IVY PLANT *** + +***** This file should be named 34510-8.txt or 34510-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/5/1/34510/ + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Josephine Paolucci and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This +book was produced from scanned images of public domain +material from the Google Print project.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/34510-8.zip b/34510-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3d713d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/34510-8.zip diff --git a/34510-h.zip b/34510-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f8e5be3 --- /dev/null +++ b/34510-h.zip diff --git a/34510-h/34510-h.htm b/34510-h/34510-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..649301d --- /dev/null +++ b/34510-h/34510-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2060 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Some Constituents Of The Poison Ivy Plant (Rhus Toxicodendron), by William Anderson Syme. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + + p { margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; + } + hr { width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; + } + + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;} + + body{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + + .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; + } /* page numbers */ + + .tocnum {position: absolute; top: auto; right: 30%;} + .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;} + + .center {text-align: center;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + + .caption {font-weight: bold;} + + .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center;} + + .figleft {float: left; clear: left; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: + 1em; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .figright {float: right; clear: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; + margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .footnotes {border: dashed 1px;} + .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;} + .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;} + .fnanchor {vertical-align: super; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;} + + .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;} + .poem br {display: none;} + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 1em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 2em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy Plant: +(Rhus Toxicodendron), by William Anderson Syme + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy Plant: (Rhus Toxicodendron) + +Author: William Anderson Syme + +Release Date: November 30, 2010 [EBook #34510] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SOME CONSTITUENTS--POISON IVY PLANT *** + + + + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Josephine Paolucci and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This +book was produced from scanned images of public domain +material from the Google Print project.) + + + + + + +</pre> + + + + +<h1>SOME CONSTITUENTS OF THE POISON IVY PLANT<br /> (RHUS TOXICODENDRON)</h1> + +<h3>DISSERTATION</h3> + +<p class="center">SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF UNIVERSITY STUDIES OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS +UNIVERSITY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR +OF PHILOSOPHY</p> + +<h2>BY WILLIAM ANDERSON SYME</h2> + +<p class="center"> +1906<br /> +<br /> +1906<br /> +THE SUN JOB PRINTING OFFICE<br /> +BALTIMORE<br /> +</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>CONTENTS.</h2> + +<p> +Acknowledgments <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_4'>4</a></span><br /> +<br /> +Literature <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_5'>5</a></span><br /> +<br /> +Introduction <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_7'>7</a></span><br /> +<br /> +Work of Khittel <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_11'>11</a></span><br /> +<br /> +Work of Maisch <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_12'>12</a></span><br /> +<br /> +Work of Pfaff <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_13'>13</a></span><br /> +<br /> +Experimental <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_14'>14</a></span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gallic Acid <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_18'>18</a></span></span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Fisetin <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_20'>20</a></span></span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Rhamnose <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_23'>23</a></span></span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">The Poison <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_28'>28</a></span></span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Potassium Permanganate as a Remedy for Rhus Poisoning <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_35'>35</a></span></span><br /> +<br /> +Summary <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_37'>37</a></span><br /> +<br /> +Biography <span class="tocnum"><a href='#Page_38'>38</a></span><br /> +</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span></p> +<h2>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.</h2> + + +<p>The author desires to avail himself of this opportunity to tender his +thanks to those under whose guidance he has worked while a student at +the Johns Hopkins University, namely to Professors Remsen, Morse, Jones, +and Andrews, and to Doctors Acree and Tingle for instruction in lecture +room and laboratory.</p> + +<p>He is especially indebted to Dr. S. F. Acree, at whose suggestion this +research work was undertaken, for counsel and assistance in its +prosecution.</p> + +<p>He would also thank Messrs. Parke, Davis and Co., of Detroit, Mich., for +the preparation of the crude material used in this investigation, and +the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., for electrotypes +of figures 17, 18, and 19 in Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span></p> +<h2>LITERATURE.</h2> + + +<p>Acides Gummiques, Garros (Dissertation) 1895.</p> + +<p>American Chemical Journal.</p> + +<p>American Journal of the Medical Sciences.</p> + +<p>American Journal of Pharmacy.</p> + +<p>Annalen der Chemie und der Pharmacie (Liebig).</p> + +<p>Annales de Chimie et de Physique.</p> + +<p>Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft.</p> + +<p>Biochemie der Pflanzen (Czapek) 1905.</p> + +<p>Brooklyn Medical Journal.</p> + +<p>Bulletin de la Société Chimique.</p> + +<p>Bulletins 20 and 26 U. S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Botany.</p> + +<p>Chemie der Zuckerarten, Von Lippmann, 1904.</p> + +<p>Chemiker-Zeitung.</p> + +<p>Comptes rendus.</p> + +<p>Industries of Japan, J. J. Rein.</p> + +<p>Journal of the Chemical Society.</p> + +<p>Journal of Experimental Medicine.</p> + +<p>Les Sucres, Maquenne, 1900.</p> + +<p>Manual of Botany, 6th Edition, Gray.</p> + +<p>Medical and Surgical Reporter.</p> + +<p>New York Medical Record.</p> + +<p>Proceedings of the American Pharmaceutical Association.</p> + +<p>Treatise on Chemistry, Roscoe and Schorlemmer.</p> + +<p>Über Mategerbstoff, Reuchlin (Dissertation) 1904.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>SOME CONSTITUENTS OF THE POISON IVY PLANT.</h2> + +<h3>(RHUS TOXICODENDRON)</h3> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span></p> +<h2>INTRODUCTION.</h2> + + +<p>Plants belonging to the natural order Anacardiaciæ (Cashew family or +Sumach family) are found in all the temperate climates of the world and +quite frequently in semi-tropical climates. Many of these plants play +important parts in economic botany, yielding dye-stuffs, tanning +material, wax, varnish, and drugs. Several species are poisonous. At +least three poisonous species of the genus <i>Rhus</i> are found in the +United States. These three are all common and well-known plants, but +confusion frequently arises concerning them on account of the different +names by which they are known in different localities. For example, +poison ivy (<i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> or <i>Rhus radicans</i>) probably the best +known poisonous plant in America, being found in all the States except +those in the extreme West, is often confounded with and popularly called +"poison oak." The true poison oak is the <i>Rhus diversiloba</i> of the +Western States.<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> The third and most poisonous species of this plant is +<i>Rhus venenata</i> or <i>Rhus vernix</i>; it is the <i>Rhus vernicifera</i> of Japan, +from which Japanese lac is obtained. It is popularly known in the United +States as "poison sumach," "poison dogwood" and "poison elder." It grows +in swamps from Canada to Florida.</p> + +<p>As the poison ivy is by far the most common of these plants in the +Eastern States, a brief description of it is given here:<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> A shrub +climbing by rootlets over rocks, etc., or ascending trees, or sometimes +low and erect; leaflets 3, rhombic-ovate, mostly pointed, and rather +downy beneath, variously notched, sinuate, or cut-lobed; high climbing +plants (<i>R. radicans</i>) having usually more entire leaves. It is found in +thickets, low grounds, etc. Greenish flowers appear in June.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span></p><div class="figcenter" style="width: 361px;"> +<img src="images/i_08a.jpg" width="361" height="640" alt="Fig. 1.—Poison ivy (Rhus radicans or Rhus +toxicodendron). a, spray showing aerial rootlets and leaves; b, +fruit—both one-fourth natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)" title="" /> +<span class="caption">Fig. 1.—Poison ivy (Rhus radicans or Rhus +toxicodendron). a, spray showing aerial rootlets and leaves; b, +fruit—both one-fourth natural size.<br /> + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)</span> +</div> + + + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span></p> + +<p>In the general description of the order Anacardiaciæ, Gray<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> says: +"Juice or exhalations often poisonous." Whether it is contact with some +part of the plant, or with the exhalation from the plant, that causes +the well-known skin eruption has been a topic for discussion ever since +its source was known. On account of its intangible nature there has been +more speculation than experimental evidence bearing on this question, +although a few investigations have been made with the object of +isolating the poison. It is most generally believed that the exhalations +are poisonous. Dr. J. H. Hunt<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> states that the exhalations have been +collected in a jar and found to be capable of inflaming and blistering +the skin of an arm plunged into it.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 345px;"> +<img src="images/i_09a.jpg" width="345" height="640" alt="Fig. 3—Poison sumach (Rhus vernix), showing leaves, +fruit, and leaf-scars, one-fourth natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)" title="" /> +<span class="caption">Fig. 3—Poison sumach (Rhus vernix), showing leaves, +fruit, and leaf-scars, one-fourth natural size.<br /> + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)</span> +</div> + +<p>Prof. J. J. Rein,<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> in his treatise on Lacquer Work, describes the +poison of the Japanese lac tree, <i>Rhus vernicifera</i>, as being volatile, +as do also the Japanese chemist Yoshida<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> and the French chemist +Bertrand.<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> Recent work by Prof. A. B. Stevens,<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> however, seems to +show that this poison is not volatile, and is similar to, if not +identical with that obtained by Pfaff<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> from <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> and +<i>Rhus venenata</i>.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span></p><p>Not many cases of internal poisoning by <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> are on +record in medical literature. Two cases of poisoning from eating the +fruit of this plant have been described.<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> The subjects of these cases +were two children who had eaten nearly a pint of the fruit. The symptoms +are described in detail, being in general, similar to those of +alkaloidal poisoning. Warm water was given to promote emesis; afterwards +large quantities of carbonate of soda were given in solution under the +belief that it was an antidote to the poison. Otherwise they were +treated on general principles. Both children recovered.</p> + +<p>Another case of internal poisoning is the following:<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> Three children +drank an infusion of the root of poison ivy thinking it was sassafras +tea. The first of these cases was diagnosed as measles, but on the +appearance of similar symptoms in the sisters of the first patient, the +cause of the trouble was found. All recovered.</p> + +<p>Dr. Pfaff<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> explains the few fatal cases that have followed Rhus +poisoning on the assumption that enough of the poison was absorbed +through the skin to cause renal complications in persons having chronic +kidney trouble. He showed that the poison, when given internally, +produces a marked effect on the kidneys, causing nephritis and fatty +degeneration of this organ.</p> + +<p>The irritating action of poison ivy has been attributed at different +times to the "exhalation," to a volatile alkaloid, to a volatile acid, +and to a non-volatile oil. Pfaff,<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> who made the most recent +investigation of this poison, obtained from the plant a non-volatile oil +having the same action on the skin as the plant itself. He found this +oil in all parts of the plant and concluded that it was the active +principle, and that one could be poisoned only by actual contact with +some part of the plant. He assumed minute quantities of pollen dust to +be in the air to account for the cases of "action at a distance" so +frequently quoted. Pfaff says: "In my opinion, it is more than doubtful +if ever a case of ivy poisoning has occurred without direct contact with +the plant or with some article that has been in contact with the plant. +The long latent period of the eruption in some cases may obviously +render mistakes extremely easy as to the occasion when contact with the +plant really occurred." Granting, however, that the active principle is +practically non-volatile when isolated from the plant, we cannot say +positively that it is not volatile in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span> juices of the plant, or under +the influence of vital forces. It is quite conceivable that the water +transpired by the leaves of the plant may carry with it a quantity of +the poison sufficient to produce the dermatitis on a person very +susceptible to its action. It is also conceivable that a volatile poison +manufactured by a living plant could become non-volatile by changes in +it consequent upon the death of the plant.</p> + +<p>Up to the present time, only three important chemical investigations of +the active principle of <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> have appeared in medical +and chemical literature, these being the researches of Dr. J. Khittel, +J. M. Maisch, a pharmacist, and Dr. Franz Pfaff, of the Harvard +University Medical School, to whose work reference has been frequently +made. The chemical work of these investigators and their conclusions are +given here in some detail for the sake of completeness.</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Chesnut. Bull. No. 20, U. S. Dept. of Agr., Div. of +Botany.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Man. of Bot., p. 119.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Man. of Bot., p. 119.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> Brook. Med. Jour., June, 1897.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Rein, The Ind. of Jap., p. 338, et seq.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> H. Yoshida on Urushi Lacquer, Jour. Chem. Soc., 1883, p. +472.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> Ann. de Chem. et de Phys., Series VII, Vol. 12, p. 125, +1897.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Amer. Jour. Pharm. 78, p. 53, Feb., 1906.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> An account of Pfaff's work will be found in another part of +this paper.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> Amer. Jour. Med. Sci. 51 (1866), p. 560.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> Med. and Surg. Rep. 17, Nov., 1867.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Jour. Exp. Med. 2 (1897), p. 181.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> Ibid.</p></div> +</div> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>KHITTEL'S INVESTIGATION.</h2> + + +<p>The first attempt to find the poisonous constituent of this plant was +made by Khittel in 1857. His work was published in <i>Wittstein's +Vierteljahrresschrift für praktische Pharmacie</i>, VII, 348-359.<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> +Khittel obtained 37-1/2 ounces of fresh leaves of poison ivy from the +botanical garden in Munich, dried them, and got a residue of 9-1/2 +ounces which he analyzed. Not detecting anything to which the poisonous +qualities of the plant could be attributed, he made another series of +experiments which, as he thought, showed that a volatile alkaloid is the +poisonous constituent. It was obtained by the following process: "3 +ounces of the powdered leaves were infused with hot distilled water, +after three days strained, expressed, the liquid evaporated to 3 ounces, +and with the addition of potassa, carefully distilled to one-half. The +clear, colorless distillate had an alkaline reaction, and an odor +resembling henbane or hemlock. It was saturated with sulphuric acid, +evaporated, and treated with a mixture of equal quantities of alcohol +and ether which left sulphate of ammonia behind, the solution was +evaporated spontaneously, distilled with potassa, the alkaline +distillate neutralized with hydrochloric acid, and a precipitate could +now be obtained with chloride of platinum. Want of material prevented +further experiments."</p> + +<p>The editor of the <i>American Journal of Pharmacy</i> inserts the following +note: "It would have been more satisfactory if the author had given some +physiological evidence of the poisonous<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span> nature of the alkaloid +substance obtained. It is quite interesting to hear that the hitherto +intangible venom of this plant has at last been detected."</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> A free translation of this paper is given in Amer. Jour. +Pharm. for 1858, p. 542.</p></div> +</div> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>WORK OF MAISCH.<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a></h2> + + +<p>The next investigation of this plant was made by Maisch in 1864. He +criticizes Khittel's experiments as follows: "It is well known that the +<i>exhalations</i> of <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> exert a poisonous influence on the +human body; the poisonous principle must, therefore, be volatile and, at +the same time, be naturally in such a loose state of combination as to +be continually eliminated and separated with the usual products of +vegetable exhalations. It is natural to suppose that during the process +of drying, the greatest portion of the poisonous principle should be +lost. The loss must be still greater if the dried leaves are powdered, a +hot infusion prepared from them, and this infusion evaporated down to +the original weight of the dried leaves. It is obvious that Dr. Khittel +could not have selected a better method for obtaining the least possible +quantity of the poisonous principle, if, indeed, it could be obtained by +this process at all."</p> + +<p>Maisch then worked up 8-3/4 ounces of the leaves of the plant in a way +to get the alkaloid, making some improvements on Khittel's method, but +failed to find it. Believing that the poison was a volatile acid, he +enclosed some fresh leaves of the plant in a tin box with several test +papers. The blue litmus paper became red showing the presence of an +acid. He concluded from this experiment that the exhalations of the +leaves contained a volatile organic acid which he thought was the +poisonous substance. To determine this point, he prepared the acid in +larger quantity by macerating the leaves with water, expressing and +distilling the expressed juice. He was poisoned in doing this work +although he had not been affected by handling the living plant and had +considered himself immune. He obtained an acid which investigation +showed to be somewhat like formic acid, more like acetic acid, but +having some reactions different from both. "Taking all the reactions +together, it is unquestionably a new organic acid for which I propose +the name of <i>Toxicodendric Acid</i>," writes Maisch. He further says: "That +it is the principle to which poison oak owes its effects on the human +system was proved to my entire satisfaction by the copious eruption and +formation of numerous vesicles on the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span> back of my hand, on the fingers, +wrists, and bare arms while I was distilling and operating with it. +Several persons coming into the room while I was engaged with it were +more or less poisoned by the vapours diffused in the room; and I even +transferred the poisonous effects to some persons, merely by shaking +hands with them.</p> + +<p>"The diluted acid, as obtained by me, and stronger solutions of its +salts, were applied to several persons, and eruptions were produced in +several instances, probably by the former, though not always, which was +most likely owing to the dilute state of the acid. Whenever this was +boiled, I always felt the same itching sensation in the face, and on the +bare arms, which I experience on continual exposure of my hands to the +juice of the plant."</p> + +<p>Toxicodendric acid was thought to be the active principle from the time +of Maisch's work until the investigation by Pfaff in 1895.</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> Proc. Amer. Pharm. Assn. 1865, p. 166, and Amer. Jour. +Pharm. 1866, p. 4.</p></div> +</div> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>PFAFF'S WORK.</h2> + + +<p>By far the most valuable work on <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> is that of Pfaff. +From a clinical study of Rhus poisoning, Pfaff came to the conclusion +that the poison must be a non-volatile skin irritant. The more volatile +the irritant, the quicker is its action on the skin. Formic acid acts +very quickly; acetic acid, less volatile than formic, acts more slowly, +but still much more quickly than poison ivy, the latent period of which +is usually from two to five days. Pfaff thought that the volatile acid +obtained by Maisch might have contained some of the poisonous principle +as an impurity, but that it would not produce the dermatitis if prepared +in a pure state. He therefore prepared a quantity of the acid by +distilling the finely divided fresh plant with steam. The yield was +increased by acidulating the mixture with sulphuric acid before the +distillation. The acid distillate so obtained was freed from a +non-poisonous oily substance by shaking the solution with ether. Barium +and sodium salts were made by neutralizing the acid, and were purified +by crystallization. Analysis showed them to be salts of acetic acid, and +they gave the characteristic tests for this acid. The toxicodendric acid +of Maisch was thus shown to be acetic acid, and was therefore not the +poisonous principle of the plant.</p> + +<p>Pfaff obtained the active principle by the following process: The plant +was extracted with alcohol, the alcohol was distilled off, and the +residue was taken up in ether. The ether solution<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span> was washed with water +and dilute sodium carbonate solution, and the ether was evaporated. An +oily, black, poisonous substance partly soluble in alcohol was obtained. +To get the active principle in a pure state, this residue was extracted +with alcohol and filtered and the filtrate was precipitated fractionally +by lead acetate. The final precipitates consisted of the lead compound +of the poison in a pure state. On decomposing the lead compounds with +ammonium sulphide, shaking out with ether, and letting the ether +evaporate spontaneously, a non-volatile oil was obtained which gave the +characteristic skin eruptions. The pure lead compounds made in different +preparations were analyzed and assigned the formula C<sub>21</sub>H<sub>30</sub>O<sub>4</sub>Pb. +The oil itself was not analyzed. Pfaff proposed the name <i>Toxicodendrol</i> +for the oil. He found that it was not volatile, was decomposed by heat, +was soluble in alcohol, ether, chloroform, benzene, etc., but insoluble +in water. Its effects upon the human skin were studied in many +experiments upon himself and others. It was shown that an exceedingly +minute quantity of the poison will produce the dermatitis, even 1/1000 +milligram applied in olive oil being active. The oil was given +internally to rabbits, its effects being most marked on the kidneys.</p> + +<p>The oil obtained by Pfaff from <i>Rhus venenata</i> seemed to be identical +with that from <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i>.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>EXPERIMENTAL.</h2> + + +<p>The writer's investigation was undertaken with the object of attempting +to throw more light on the chemical nature of the poisonous substance +found in <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i>. Soon after commencing work, however, it +became apparent that the poison could be more intelligently studied if +the substances associated with it in the plant were first identified; +the scope of the work was therefore extended to an investigation of the +other constituents of the plant, and it was hoped that a knowledge of +the properties of these constituents would suggest a more economical way +of getting the poison than the method of fractional precipitation.</p> + +<p>The crude material for this work was prepared by Messrs. Parke, Davis & +Co., of Detroit, Mich., according to special instructions submitted to +them: 67-1/2 pounds of fresh leaves and flowers of poison ivy were +collected near Detroit and carefully inspected by a competent botanist. +This material was thoroughly macerated and put into ten-liter bottles +with ether. The mass was thoroughly shaken, water being added to make it +more<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a></span> mobile. The ether was then separated off and the extraction was +repeated three times in the same way to insure complete removal of the +toxicodendrol. The ether extracts were combined, thoroughly dried with +anhydrous sodium sulphate, and the ether was distilled off, the +temperature being kept below 40° C. during the entire distillation. The +residue after the removal of the ether was a thick, black, tar-like +mass, weighing 3 pounds 11 ounces. In extracting the plant, about +twenty-four gallons of ether were used. It is a significant fact in +regard to the volatility of the poison that during the process of +preparing this material none of the employees engaged in the work were +in any way affected, since proper precautions were taken and the +utensils were handled with rubber gloves.</p> + +<p>The crude ether extract, which will be designated as the "original +material," was shipped to Baltimore in August and was kept in a cool +place until November when the investigation was begun. When the bottle +was opened, there seemed to be an escape of a vapor, and a nauseating +odor suggesting crushed green leaves pervaded the atmosphere. Some days +later, irregular red patches appeared on the face though a mask of +cotton cloth was worn during the work, and the hands were protected by +rubber gloves.</p> + +<p>Assuming from Pfaff's work that this original material contained the +non-volatile oil toxicodendrol, the first experiment was to try to +distil it out under diminished pressure. For this purpose, an Anschütze +distilling bulb containing ten grams of the tar was connected with a +vacuum pump. After a pressure of 2 mm. had been established the bulb was +gradually heated in a bath of Wood's metal. Nothing distilled over. The +material began to carbonize at a temperature of 140° to 150°.</p> + +<p>It was then thought that perhaps the oil could be converted into an +ester which might be more volatile and could be distilled out. 20 grams +of the original material were dissolved in 100 cc. of absolute alcohol +containing 3 grains of hydrochloric acid gas, and the mixture was heated +10 hours on a water-bath under a return condenser. After the heating, +the mixture had a delightful ethereal odor. The flask was corked and +left standing several weeks while other work was in progress. The ester +solution was then put in a vacuum desiccator over sulphuric acid and the +alcohol evaporated. A black, tarry, solid mass was left having the ester +odor. It was extracted with warm water and filtered from insoluble tar. +The filtrate had a green color and the ethereal odor. It was shaken out +with ether; the ether layer had a blood-red color while the water layer +was deep green.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span> The extraction with ether was continued until the water +layer was no longer green. The combined ether extracts were evaporated +in a desiccator without heat. A black tar-like solid was left very much +like the original material, but it had the ester odor. It was partly +soluble in water and readily soluble in alcohol. The alcoholic solution +was tested on the skin and found to be not poisonous. The ester, or +mixture of esters, was not investigated further in this connection, but +was later shown to give the reactions for gallic acid and methyl +furfurol. These reactions will be referred to in connection with other +experiments.</p> + +<p>After a few other preliminary experiments, it became evident that the +original material was a complex mixture of substances and that it would +have to be fractionated by some means and the fractions studied +separately.</p> + +<p>A portion of the original substance was treated with 50 per cent. +alcohol and was found to be partly soluble in this medium. The solution +was filtered from insoluble tar. A portion of the yellow filtrate gave a +reddish yellow precipitate with lead acetate. The alcoholic solution was +distilled in an Anschütze flask under diminished pressure; a yellow +liquid condensed in the arm of the flask while most of the alcohol was +collected in a bottle connected with the arm. The yellow liquid was acid +to litmus. Water was added, the solution was shaken out with ether and +the ether was evaporated. When the small residue was completely dry, it +was a yellow solid soluble in dilute alcohol and acid to litmus. The +substance was not volatile enough to justify the use of this method for +getting it.</p> + +<p>Chlorophyll could not be removed from the original substance because the +solvents for chlorophyll such as alcohol, ether, fats, petroleum, and +carbon bisulphide dissolve large quantities of the mixture.</p> + +<p>A precipitate obtained by adding lead acetate to a filtered solution of +the original substance in 50 per cent. alcohol was suspended in water, +decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, shaken out with ether and the ether +evaporated. The residue appeared at first to be a yellow oil, but on +complete evaporation of the ether in a desiccator, a yellow solid was +obtained—apparently the same as that obtained by vacuum distillation.</p> + +<p>A solution of the original material in 50 per cent. alcohol was filtered +through bone-black and the filtrate was colorless. Examination showed +that everything had been removed by the bone-black and the filtrate was +apparently pure alcohol and water.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span></p> + +<p>In precipitating an alcoholic solution of the crude material with a +solution of lead acetate, it was noticed that at least two kinds of +precipitates were formed. The part that went down first was darker in +color than that thrown down later. Pfaff used the last fractions in +obtaining his oil and stated that these precipitates consisted of the +lead compound of the oil in a pure state. It was found by experiment +that the darker part was soluble in ether while the lighter part was +not. This indicated that the darker part consisted of tarry matter which +was brought down mechanically or separated out when the alcoholic +solution was diluted by the lead acetate solution, or was perhaps a lead +compound soluble in ether. To test this point an experiment was made as +follows: Some of the crude material was thoroughly extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol. The tar insoluble in 50 per cent. alcohol was then +treated with 95 per cent. alcohol; most of it dissolved; the solution +was filtered and lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol was added. A +greenish colored precipitate was formed which was filtered off and found +to be completely soluble in ether and soluble to a considerable extent +in strong alcohol. These experiments suggested that the light colored +lead compound which was thought to contain the poison could be purified +by extraction with ether in a Soxhlet apparatus more conveniently than +by the tedious process of fractional precipitation. Further preliminary +experiments showed that 50 per cent. alcohol extracted from the original +material all of the substance or substances which gave the light colored +precipitate and dissolved only a small amount of the tar.</p> + +<p>Two hundred and eighty-eight grams of the crude material were then +extracted several times with 50 per cent. alcohol and filtered; the +insoluble tar was washed and saved for examination. To the filtrate was +added an excess of a solution of lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol. +The large precipitate, which will be designated as "precipitate A," was +filtered and drained by suction in a Büchner funnel. The alcoholic +"filtrate A" was saved. Precipitate A was extracted with ether in +Soxhlet extractors until the ether came over practically colorless, the +operation being interrupted from time to time to stir up the precipitate +in the thimble. The green colored ether solution was saved for future +examination. The lead precipitate, after extraction with ether and +drying, weighed about 116 grams. A portion of this lead compound was +decomposed by hydrogen sulphide in a mixture of water and ether which +was well shaken during the operation. The ether was separated, filtered, +and evaporated under diminished pressure without heat, and there +remained a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span> yellow oily looking residue having a pleasant odor. When the +ether and water were completely removed in a vacuum desiccator, a hard, +brittle, yellow resin weighing about 16 grams was obtained. It was +soluble in alcohol, had a strong acid reaction and was free from +nitrogen<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> and sulphur. The nitrogen tests were made by the Lassaign +and soda lime methods,<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> and the sulphur test was made with sodium +nitroprusside after fusing the residue with sodium. The main portion of +the lead compound was decomposed under alcohol by hydrogen sulphide, +filtered, and the alcoholic filtrate evaporated in vacuo. The same +yellow acid resin was obtained. Experiments continuing through several +weeks were made in applying solutions of this resin to rats, rabbits and +guinea pigs. Finding it to be without effect upon these animals it was +tried on the writer and found to be not poisonous.<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> In the meantime +the resin was being studied in the laboratory.</p> + + +<h3>GALLIC ACID.</h3> + +<p>An alcoholic solution of the resin was just neutralized with potassium +hydroxide. During the titration, the solution rapidly became dark brown. +After neutralization it was shaken with ether; the water solution +remained brown while the ether layer was nearly colorless and contained +practically no dissolved substance. A portion of the water solution of +the potassium salt on being acidified with sulphuric acid and standing +over night, deposited a slight precipitate. The solution of the +potassium salt gave a heavy precipitate with lead acetate somewhat +similar to the original lead precipitate A, and also slight precipitates +with salts of zinc, mercury, copper, and silver (with reduction). It +gave a bluish-black color with impure ferrous sulphate and a dark color +with ferric chloride. It reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate and Fehling +solution. These experiments indicated the presence of a tannin compound. +An alcoholic solution of the resin gave the same color reactions with +iron salts as did the potassium salt. To determine which one of the +tannin compounds was present was a matter of some difficulty since the +di- and tri-hydroxybenzoic acids have in general the same color +reactions. The presence of other plant<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span> substances in the solution also +interferes with the color tests, and finally, a substance which gives a +blue color with iron salts and one giving a green color may be found +together in the same plant.<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> Further tests with a solution of the +resin in dilute alcohol, and with a water solution of the acid +precipitated by adding sulphuric acid to a solution of the resin in +potassium hydroxide, led to the conclusion that the acid is gallic acid. +These tests were the following:</p> + +<p>(1) Boiling with an excess of potassium hydroxide gave a black substance +(tauromelanic acid).</p> + +<p>(2) The acid was not precipitated by gelatin.</p> + +<p>(3) On addition of potassium cyanide a transitory red color appeared +which reappeared on shaking with air.</p> + +<p>Gallic acid is distinguished from tannic acid by tests (2) and (3). At +later stages in the work the potassium, barium, and sodium salts of +gallic acid were obtained, and finally the pure acid was made by +decomposing the sodium salt with sulphuric acid and crystallizing from +water. A portion of the acid so obtained was further purified by +dissolving in absolute alcohol and pouring into absolute ether.<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> The +melting point behavior of the acid corresponds with that of gallic acid; +it melted with decomposition at about 230°. For further identification, +some of the acid was converted into an ester by the following process: +it was dissolved in 80 per cent. alcohol, hydrochloric acid gas was +passed in, and the solution was heated an hour on the water bath. It was +then evaporated to a small bulk, neutralized with barium carbonate and +extracted with ether. The ether, on evaporation, left the ester which +was crystallized from water and dried in a desiccator over sulphuric +acid. The anhydrous ester agreed in melting point (156° to 159°) and +other properties with the ester of gallic acid described by Grimaux.<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> +For the sake of comparison, an ester was made from gallic acid obtained +from another source and the two agreed in properties. A mixture of the +two esters melted within the limits given for the ester of gallic acid.</p> + +<p>While the tests leading to the identification of gallic acid were being +made, another series of experiments was in progress. Eleven and one-half +grams of the resin obtained from lead precipitate A by decomposition +with hydrogen sulphide were treated with 0.1 n. potassium hydroxide +added from a burette until the acid was exactly neutralized. All went +into solution.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span> On shaking with ether, some of the potassium salt +separated out and was saved for examination. The solution became brown +on exposure to air and got darker as the work proceeded. The acid in +solution as a potassium salt was precipitated out in four fractions by +adding for each fraction one-fourth the amount of 0.1 n. sulphuric acid +required to neutralize the potassium hydroxide used. The precipitates +were filtered off and examined. The first was small in amount, gummy and +hard to filter. The solution was shaken with ether after each +precipitate had been filtered off. The succeeding precipitates were in +better condition, but were not pure. All appeared to be impure gallic +acid which had become brown by absorption of oxygen. They were saved, +however, to be tested for poison. After the last fraction had separated, +the filtrate was shaken several times with ether and saved for further +examination, which will be described under "Rhamnose." This filtrate is +designated as B.</p> + +<p>At this stage of the work a portion of the resin obtained from lead +precipitate A was tested and found to be not poisonous as already +mentioned. By this test, all the substances contained in the lead +precipitate A after its extraction with ether in the Soxhlet apparatus, +were eliminated from the possible poisonous substances. The poison must +therefore have been extracted by the ether.</p> + +<p>A fresh portion of the original poisonous material was treated with 50 +per cent. alcohol and filtered from insoluble tar. The filtrate was +precipitated in six fractions by lead acetate. The last fractions were +lighter in color and apparently much purer than the first. The sixth +lead precipitate was decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, the light-yellow +water solution was tested and found to be not poisonous. It gave the +characteristic reactions for gallic acid. The poison, if precipitated at +all by lead acetate, must have gone down in one of the preceding +fractions. Later experiments showed that it is brought down partly +mechanically and partly as a lead compound in the first precipitates.</p> + + +<h3>FISETIN.</h3> + +<p>Having identified gallic acid, and not finding any other phenol +derivative in the lead precipitate, some of the original material was +extracted with hot water to remove gallic acid and filtered from tar +while hot. The filtrate had a deep yellow color. On cooling over night, +an olive green precipitate separated out which was dried and found to be +a light powder. It was practically<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span> insoluble in cold water, soluble +with great difficulty in boiling water from which it separated in yellow +flakes, slightly soluble in ether and in acetic acid, but readily +soluble in alcohol. The solutions were not acid to litmus, gave a dark +color with ferric chloride, an orange-red precipitate with lead acetate +which was easily soluble in acetic acid, and an orange-yellow +precipitate with stannous chloride. These properties and reactions +indicated that the substance was the dye-stuff fisetin and that it +occurs in the free state in this plant though it is usually found as a +glucoside of fisetin combined with tannic acid. A compound of this kind +was found in <i>Rhus cotinus</i> and named "fustin-tannide" by Schmid<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a>. He +showed that the fustin-tannide could be decomposed by acetic acid into +tannic acid and a glucoside, fustin C<sub>46</sub>H<sub>42</sub>O<sub>21</sub>. Fustin, on +heating with dilute sulphuric acid, gave fisetin and a sugar supposed to +be rhamnose. Fisetin was also found as a glucoside compound in <i>Rhus +rhodanthema</i> by Perkin.<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a></p> + +<p>The yellow substance which separated from the boiling water solution was +further purified by dissolving in a small quantity of hot alcohol and +adding hot water. On cooling, the yellow substance separated out in a +flocculent condition. Examined under the microscope, the flakes appeared +to be made up of masses of fine crystals.</p> + +<p>An alcoholic solution of the substance gave a black color with ammonia +which became red on addition of more ammonia. Concentrated acids +intensified the yellow color of the alcoholic solution. Fehling solution +and ammoniacal silver nitrate were reduced by it. Potassium hydroxide +added to an alcoholic solution gave at first a deep red color +accompanied by a green fluorescence which disappeared, leaving a yellow +liquid. With an excess of caustic potash, the red color returned and was +permanent. These reactions are characteristic for fisetin.<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a></p> + +<p>Furthermore, fisetin should give protocatechuic acid and phloroglucinol +by fusion with caustic potash under proper conditions.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> The +experiment was carried out as follows: 2 grams of fisetin were gently +heated in a nickel crucible with 6 grams of caustic potash dissolved in +6 cc. water. An inflammable gas, apparently hydrogen, was evolved during +the fusion. The pasty mass was dissolved in water, acidified with +sulphuric acid, and filtered. The filtrate was shaken out with ether +containing one-fourth<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span> its volume of alcohol. The ether was evaporated +and the residue was extracted with warm water and filtered. Lead acetate +was added to the filtrate to precipitate protocatechuic acid, while +phloroglucinol remained in the filtrate from this precipitate. The lead +precipitate was suspended in water, decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, +filtered, and evaporated to obtain protocatechuic acid. That the +substance obtained was protocatechuic acid was shown by the following +characteristic tests:</p> + +<p>(1) It gave a greenish brown color with ferric chloride; on addition of +one drop of a dilute solution of sodium carbonate, the color became dark +blue; on adding more sodium carbonate the color became red.</p> + +<p>(2) A violet color was obtained when a solution of the acid was treated +with a drop of sodium carbonate solution and then with a drop of ferrous +sulphate.</p> + +<p>(3) It reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate.</p> + +<p>(4) It did not reduce Fehling solution.</p> + +<p>The filtrate supposed to contain phloroglucinol was treated with +hydrogen sulphide to remove lead, filtered, and shaken with ether. The +residue left on evaporating the ether was taken up in water. This +solution gave the following reactions characteristic for phloroglucinol:</p> + +<p>(1) It reduced both silver nitrate and Fehling solution.</p> + +<p>(2) It colored pine wood moistened with hydrochloric acid red.</p> + +<p>(3) It gave a red color with vanillin and hydrochloric acid, and</p> + +<p>(4) A deeper red color with oil of cloves and hydrochloric acid, +becoming purple on standing.</p> + +<p>(5) It gave a violet color with ferric chloride.</p> + +<p>The substance is then, without doubt, fisetin. The formula<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> of +fisetin is supposed to be</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 375px;"> +<img src="images/fisetin.jpg" width="375" height="202" alt="" title="" /> +</div> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span></p> + +<h3>RHAMNOSE.</h3> + +<p>It was stated above that Schmid obtained a sugar solution by the +decomposition of a fisetin-glucoside from <i>Rhus cotinus</i>, and Perkin +obtained the same from a glucoside in <i>Rhus rhodanthema</i>. These +investigators thought that the sugar was isodulcite or rhamnose, but +they did not isolate it on account of the small quantities of material +at their disposal. Moreover, the sugar is very hard to crystallize in +the presence of other soluble substances and is not found in large +quantity in plants. Maquenne<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> could obtain only 15 to 20 gm. of +rhamnose by working up 1 kilogram of the berries of <i>Rhamnus +infectorius</i>. Assuming that the free fisetin found in poison ivy leaves +had its origin in the decomposition of a fisetin-glucoside by natural +processes, it was reasonable to suppose that the sugar would also be +found in the free state, although, according to Roscoe and +Schorlemmer:<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> "Isodulcite does not occur in the free state in nature, +but is found as a peculiar ethereal salt belonging to the class of +glucosides. On boiling with dilute sulphuric acid, this splits up into +isodulcite and other bodies...." The more recent works on the sugars and +on plant chemistry<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> mention the occurrence of rhamnose only in the +glucoside form, with one possible exception. The exception referred to +is the occurrence of a free sugar, supposed to be rhamnose, in a certain +palm-wine.<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> Czapek says:<a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> "The well-known methyl pentoses do not +occur in the free state in plant organisms so far as we know."</p> + +<p>Since rhamnose forms a lead compound, the sugar, if present, should be +found in the first lead precipitate, A, and also in filtrate A in case +it is not completely precipitated in the presence of acetic acid and +alcohol.</p> + +<p>The filtrate A (about two liters) was examined first. It had a light +yellow color, contained an excess of lead acetate, and was acid from the +acetic acid liberated in the precipitation of the lead compound A.<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> +This filtrate was evaporated to dryness under diminished pressure to +remove alcohol, water, and acetic acid. The clear distillate had a +peculiar odor suggesting both tea and amyl formate. It was saved for +examination and was found to be not poisonous. The residue in the dish +after evaporation<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span> was a tough reddish brown, gummy mass which could be +drawn out into fine threads. It had a pleasant sweet odor. It was +extracted several times with hot water, each portion being filtered. A +brownish yellow powder remained undissolved and was saved. The combined +filtrates deposited more of the yellow solid on standing. This powder +will be referred to later as "P." The filtered liquid was freed from +lead by hydrogen sulphide. The solution then had a lemon yellow color, a +sweet odor and was acid from acetic acid. On concentrating the solution +by evaporation and making a small portion of it alkaline with sodium +hydroxide, the yellow color came out very intense<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a>. The alkaline +solution reduced Fehling solution and ammoniacal silver nitrate, +indicating the presence of a sugar. Another portion of the solution gave +a slight precipitate with phenyl hydrazine in the cold. The remainder of +the solution was evaporated to dryness, extracted with water, filtered, +and again evaporated. A dark sticky syrup was left which was only partly +soluble in water. This was treated with water, filtered, and the +filtrate was evaporated, the water being replaced from time to time to +remove acetic acid. Finally the liquid gave the following tests for +rhamnose, besides those already mentioned:</p> + +<p>(1) With α-naphthol<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> and sulphuric acid, a purple violet +color.</p> + +<p>(2) With thymol<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> and sulphuric acid, a red color.</p> + +<p>(3) With resorcinol<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> and sulphuric acid, red color.</p> + +<p>(4) With orcinol<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> and hydrochloric acid, red color.</p> + +<p>(5) With ammonium picrate and sodium picrate, yellowish red color.</p> + +<p>(6) With phloroglucinol and hydrochloric acid, red color.</p> + +<p>(7) It decolorized an alkaline solution of potassium ferricyanide.</p> + +<p>(8) It gave a white precipitate with lead acetate.</p> + +<p>The filtrate B (p. 20) from which gallic acid was precipitated by +sulphuric acid in four fractions was saved to examine for sugar. To +remove gallic acid completely, and other vegetable matter, it was shaken +out several times with ether, and was kept at a low temperature with +salt and ice for a long time. It was left standing for several weeks, +during which time more brown matter separated out and was filtered off. +The filtrate was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a></span> evaporated to a small bulk, cooled, and filtered from +crystals of potassium sulphate. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness, +the residue taken up in water and filtered through bone-black. Addition +of alcohol caused complete precipitation of potassium sulphate. The +solution then gave the above mentioned characteristic tests for +rhamnose.</p> + +<p>All attempts to get the osazone of the sugar by the method of +Fischer<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a> failed, probably on account of the small quantity of the +sugar present. The plant, it will be remembered, was originally +extracted with ether in which rhamnose is practically insoluble. The +above described tests, however, can leave no doubt as to the identity of +the sugar.</p> + +<p>Additional evidence that the sugar is rhamnose was obtained by a method +described by Maquenne<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a> as follows:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"The production of methyl furfurol in the dehydration of +isodulcite furnishes a very simple means of characterizing +this sugar in mixtures which contain it; it is sufficient, +for example, to distil 50 gm. of quercitron wood with as +much sulphuric acid and about 150 gm. of water, then to +rectify the liquid obtained in order to get several drops of +the crude furfurol, which on addition of alcohol and +concentrated sulphuric acid gives immediately the green +coloration characteristic of methyl furfurol. This procedure +is applicable to extracts as well as to entire plants, and +has the advantage that it does not require the separation of +isodulcite, the crystallization of which is often very slow +and at times impossible when it is mixed with other very +soluble substances."</p></div> + +<p>The experiment was tried with the crude ether extract of the plant +according to the directions of Maquenne, and the green color with +alcohol and sulphuric acid was obtained from the thicker oily portion of +the distillate. This test can be made with hydrochloric acid<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> as well +as with sulphuric. Therefore the color test was tried with the ester +mixture prepared in one of the early experiments by boiling the original +plant material with hydrochloric acid and alcohol. Methyl furfurol was +found here also, this method indeed giving better results than that of +Maquenne.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span></p><p>The presence of free rhamnose has thus been shown in the original +material, in the first precipitate by lead acetate, and in the filtrate +from this precipitate. Experiments to be described under "The Poison" +showed that the ether extract from the Soxhlet apparatus contained a +substance which yielded rhamnose when hydrolyzed by dilute sulphuric +acid.</p> + +<p>The presence of free gallic acid, fisetin, and rhamnose in the plant can +be readily explained by a series of assumptions for which there is a +considerable amount of experimental evidence. There is reason to believe +that tannin-like bodies are formed at the expense of chlorophyll,<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> +that complex tannin bodies can be broken down by acetic acid (also found +in <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i>) into a tannic acid and a glucoside (for +example, the "fustin-tannide" mentioned above yields tannic acid and +fisetin-glucoside); and finally that the glucoside can be hydrolyzed by +acids or enzymes giving, in the sumach plants, fisetin and rhamnose.</p> + +<p>Nitrogenous ferments which can effect the hydrolysis of glucosides and +give rise to sugars are frequently found in plants, for example, emulsin +in almonds, myrosin in mustard, and erythrozym in madder. Acree and +Hinkins<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a> found that diastase, pancreatin, and a number of other +enzymes cause hydrolysis of triacetyl glucose with the formation of +glucose and acetic acid. Stevens<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> obtained a nitrogenous oxidizing +enzyme from <i>Rhus vernicifera</i>. The close relationship between the +poisonous species of <i>Rhus</i> would lead us to suppose that the same +soluble ferment exists in poison ivy, though it was not detected in the +original material used in these experiments, probably because the plant +was extracted with ether in which the enzyme is insoluble. The existence +of such a soluble ferment would explain the presence of free sugar and +free fisetin.</p> + + +<h4>EVIDENCE OF THE PRESENCE OF A FATTY ACID IN FILTRATE A.</h4> + +<p>The brown substance P, obtained from filtrate A by evaporation and +extracting the residue with hot water, was suspended in warm water and +dilute sulphuric was added. A white precipitate was formed and a strong +fatty acid odor was developed. After the mixture had been heated for +some hours on the water bath a small portion was made alkaline and it +reduced Fehling solution. The main solution was filtered and the +precipitate supposed to be a fatty acid was saved. The filtrate was +neutralized<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span> with barium carbonate, filtered, evaporated, freed from +caramel, and the solution then gave the tests mentioned above for +rhamnose.</p> + +<p>A portion of the precipitate supposed to be a fatty acid was ignited in +a porcelain spoon. It fused, carbonized, and burned. The remainder was +heated with alcoholic potash and reprecipitated with hydrochloric acid. +The precipitate was washed and heated with alcohol. Part of it +dissolved. The insoluble part was found to be a lead compound. On +boiling it with hydrochloric acid and cooling, lead chloride +crystallized out. This was confirmed by dissolving the lead chloride in +hot water and precipitating as lead sulphide. These experiments were not +carried farther on account of the small quantity of material, but they +show that the gummy substance obtained from filtrate A contained +rhamnose (either as a lead compound of free sugar or as a lead compound +of a rhamnoside), and also, most probably, the lead compound of an +organic acid.<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a></p> + + +<h4>THE FRAGRANT DISTILLATE.</h4> + +<p>Several times in the course of this work, extracts of the original plant +material in alcohol and in water were distilled under diminished +pressure for the purpose of concentrating the solutions. The distillate, +in every case, had an ethereal odor suggesting amyl formate in very +dilute solution, but was more fragrant. The distillate from a water +extract was examined. It was a clear liquid, a little darker than pure +water, was not poisonous, was neutral to litmus paper, gave no color +with ferric chloride, reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate, but not Fehling +solution, and gave a faint red color with dilute ammonium hydroxide and +with sodium carbonate.</p> + +<p>A small quantity of a finely divided black precipitate separated out +from the water distillate on standing.</p> + +<p>The substance with the fragrant odor was extracted by shaking the +distillate with ether and letting the ether evaporate spontaneously. A +very small quantity of a yellow solid was deposited on the sides of the +dish. This substance had a strong and persistent odor, so sweet as to be +almost nauseating. Not enough was obtained for examination or analysis. +This fragrant residue was difficultly soluble in water and the solution +reduced<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span> silver nitrate in ammonia. A steam distillate of the original +plant material had the same fragrant odor as the distillate from a water +extract.</p> + + +<h3>THE POISON.</h3> + +<p>288 grams of the original poisonous material were extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol, and this alcoholic solution was precipitated with lead +acetate in the manner already described (p. 17). The lead precipitate so +obtained was extracted with ether in Soxhlet extractors and after the +extraction was found by test to be free from poison. Therefore the +poison, if precipitated by the lead acetate, must have been extracted by +the ether. This ether solution had a dark green color, and was acid from +acetic acid brought down in the lead precipitate. The ether was +evaporated in a vacuum desiccator without heat and there remained a +small quantity of an acid mixture of water and a soft tar; the watery +part was colored green, showing that the tar was soluble to some extent +in dilute acetic acid. The mixture had the peculiar odor of the original +material. A small drop of the green watery part was applied to the +wrist, allowed to remain a few minutes and was then removed by absorbent +paper, but the spot was not washed. Itching and reddening of the skin +commenced within twenty-four hours. At the end of forty-eight hours, +there was a well developed case of poisoning. How this was cured will be +described in another place.</p> + +<p>A small portion of the poisonous mixture was dissolved in alcohol, and +this solution was divided into three parts. The first part was treated +with ferric chloride, but it gave no color reaction. Another portion of +the alcoholic solution was diluted with water. It became turbid. The +third portion gave a dirty-green precipitate with lead acetate, which +seemed to come down more readily when the solution was diluted with +water. The main portion of the poisonous mixture was then dissolved in +95 per cent. alcohol and lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol was added. +The precipitate was filtered, washed, and decomposed by hydrogen +sulphide in a mixture of water and ether. The ether solution was +filtered and evaporated. The residue was a tar which, on standing in a +desiccator for some time, became dry enough to break into sticky lumps. +An alcoholic solution of this substance gave a dark color with ferric +chloride and a light colored precipitate with lead acetate.</p> + +<p>To get more of the poisonous tar for study, 233 grams of original +material were extracted with 95 per cent. alcohol. Strong alcohol was +used in order to dissolve as much of the tar as<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span> possible. The solution +had a dark greenish color, but was somewhat yellow in thin layers. The +undissolved tar was filtered off and extracted twice again in the same +way. The tar left after the third extraction was only slightly soluble +in alcohol, and its solution was not poisonous. The three filtrates from +these three extractions were precipitated separately by lead acetate in +50 per cent. alcohol. The first precipitate was largest, darkest in +color, and carried down more tarry matter. The second was light green, +and the third was quite small, black, and was not a lead compound at +all, but some of the tar which separated out on diluting the strong +alcohol with the weaker grade containing lead acetate. It was soluble in +ether and less soluble in alcohol. The alcoholic solution of this third +lot gave no precipitate with hydrogen sulphide. The first and second +lead precipitates were filtered by suction and washed with water. They +were kept a day or two in a desiccator over sulphuric acid, but did not +become completely dry. The weight of these two moist precipitates +together was 172 grams. They were combined and extracted with ether in +Soxhlet extractors which were kept in operation during work hours for +three days.</p> + +<p>In the meantime the alcoholic filtrates from these lead precipitates +were combined and concentrated on the water bath by distilling off two +liters of alcohol. The alcohol obtained had the peculiar odor of the +original material, but was not poisonous.</p> + +<p>After a long extraction of the lead precipitate in the Soxhlet +extractors, the green ether solutions were combined and washed by +shaking them with water to remove lead acetate and acetic acid in case +any should have been held in the lead precipitate. The ether was +distilled off at a low temperature and there remained a soft tar, a +portion of which was not completely soluble in 95 per cent. alcohol. The +alcoholic solution had a greenish yellow color and was poisonous. The +tar was also partly soluble in acetic acid, and this solution was found +to contain lead. Thinking that the lead acetate had not been completely +washed out, the main part of the tar was dissolved in ether and shaken +with water. The wash water continued to give a test for lead as long as +the washing was continued. This indicated probably the hydrolysis of an +unstable lead compound. Hydrogen sulphide was passed into the ether +solution mixed with water to remove the lead. Lead sulphide was filtered +off, and the ether was evaporated. A small portion of the tar residue in +alcoholic solution gave a color reaction with ferric chloride. As this +may have been due to traces of lead gallate dissolved in the extraction +with ether and afterwards decomposed by hydrogen<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span> sulphide, the main +portion of the tar was redissolved in ether and shaken with water until +it no longer reacted with ferric chloride. The ether was then evaporated +and a soft, black, poisonous tar or gum of uniform consistency was left +which was shown by tests to be free from gallic acid and lead. These +experiments showed that some of the poison was precipitated as a lead +compound soluble in ether and some was brought down mechanically in the +free state. To see if the extraction with ether in the Soxhlet apparatus +was complete, the residue in the thimbles was decomposed by hydrogen +sulphide and shaken with ether. The dark colored ether solution was +freed from gallic acid by shaking with water and dilute sodium carbonate +solution, and was evaporated. A small quantity of tar was obtained which +was added to the main portion.</p> + +<p>A solution of the poisonous tar in 95 per cent. alcohol did not reduce +Fehling solution and did not give a precipitate with lead acetate except +the separation of a small quantity of tar, which was not a lead +compound. The lead compound of the poison was apparently soluble in 95 +per cent. alcohol as well as in ether, for it would not precipitate in +this medium, although it was found in the original precipitate by lead +acetate. The alcoholic solution of the tar became turbid on diluting +with water.</p> + +<p>In order to see if the poison is volatile with vapor of acetic acid, +since this acid is found in the plant and it is thought by some that the +poison is volatile, a portion of the tar was distilled under diminished +pressure with acetic acid. It was soluble to some extent in the acid. +The temperature did not go higher than 55° during the distillation. A +tube containing cotton wet with sweet oil was placed between the +receiver and the water suction so that the uncondensed vapors would have +to pass through the cotton. This cotton was rubbed on the skin and was +not poisonous. The yellow distillate collected in the receiver was also +tested and was not poisonous.</p> + + +<h4>HYDROLYSIS OF THE POISON.</h4> + +<p>About 5 grams of the poisonous tar free from gallic acid and sugar was +dissolved in alcohol, and dilute (2 per cent.) sulphuric acid was added. +Some of the tar separated out on diluting the alcohol with the acid. The +mixture was heated on a water bath during work hours for four days. A +purple and green fluorescent solution was formed, though much tar was +left apparently unchanged. The alcohol was evaporated off and the +solution was filtered from tar. The fluorescent filtrate was shaken +with<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span> ether, by which the green substance was removed, leaving the +solution purple. The ether left, on evaporation, a small quantity of a +green substance having a pleasant ester odor. It was not further +examined. A portion of the purple solution was exactly neutralized with +sodium carbonate. This solution gave a blue-black color with ferric +chloride which became red on addition of another drop of sodium +carbonate, indicating gallic acid. It also reduced Fehling solution.</p> + +<p>Another portion of the purple solution was made alkaline with sodium +carbonate. A reddish-brown flocculent precipitate was formed and was +filtered off. The filtrate did not give any color with ferric chloride, +but it reduced Fehling solution. It also gave the test for rhamnose with +α-naphthol.</p> + +<p>The main portion of the purple solution was made alkaline with sodium +carbonate; the precipitate was filtered off and dissolved in acetic +acid. This solution was yellow and gave a reaction with ferric chloride +similar to that of gallic acid. The filtrate from the precipitate by +sodium carbonate was concentrated by evaporation until sodium sulphate +began to crystallize out. Alcohol was added to precipitate the sodium +sulphate completely, the mixture was heated and filtered. The alcoholic +filtrate was concentrated to a syrup which reduced Fehling solution and +gave the characteristic tests for rhamnose already described. By this +hydrolysis, the tar was split up into rhamnose and some form of gallic +acid which could be precipitated by sodium carbonate. This compound, +whose acetic acid solution was yellow, probably contained fisetin also. +The reason for this last statement will appear from the following +experiment:</p> + + +<h4>DECOMPOSITION OF THE POISON WITH ACETIC ACID.</h4> + +<p>A portion of the poisonous tar was heated in an open dish with strong +acetic acid. The tar seemed to be decomposed to some extent, giving a +yellow substance. Acetic acid was added from time to time as it +evaporated. After several evaporations, water was added, the mixture was +heated to boiling and filtered. This filtrate No. 1 will be mentioned +later. The residue in the dish consisted of undecomposed tar and an +olive-green flaky substance. This substance was heated with a fresh +portion of glacial acetic acid. Water was added, and the mixture was +boiled and filtered. The filtrate had a deep yellow color suggesting +fisetin. It was shaken out with ethyl acetate which became colored +yellow. A portion of the ethyl acetate solution<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span> gave an orange red +precipitate with lead acetate showing the presence of fisetin. The ethyl +acetate was removed from the remainder of the solution by evaporation +and the yellow residue was taken up in alcohol. This alcoholic solution +gave the characteristic reactions for fisetin with stannous chloride, +with potassium hydroxide, with ferric chloride and with Fehling +solution.</p> + +<p>Filtrate No. 1 obtained by heating the poisonous tar with acetic acid +and hot water as described above was investigated as follows: A portion +of it gave a reddish colored precipitate with sodium carbonate as in the +case when the tar was hydrolyzed with sulphuric acid. The remainder was +nearly neutralized with sodium carbonate and lead acetate was added in +excess to remove gallic acid. The excess of lead was removed by +sulphuric acid, and the sulphuric acid was removed by barium carbonate. +The solution on evaporation reduced Fehling solution to some extent, but +a white precipitate was also formed.</p> + +<p>In this experiment, gallic acid and fisetin and probably sugar were +formed by decomposition of the poisonous gum with acetic acid, the acid +found in the plant by Pfaff. The presence of free gallic acid, fisetin +and rhamnose in the plant can therefore be explained by the natural +hydrolysis of a complex gum or tar or a constituent thereof. The +poisonous property is lost in the general rearrangement which takes +place during hydrolysis.</p> + +<p>The poisonous tar was not hydrolyzed by boiling with a dilute solution +of sodium carbonate.</p> + +<p>It was found, as has been stated elsewhere, that the lead compound of +the poison could not be precipitated in 95 per cent. alcohol. Further +experiments, however, showed that on extracting the poisonous gum with +50 per cent. alcohol, a portion of it dissolved, and this solution gave +a precipitate with lead acetate which was a true lead compound. The +remainder of the purified tar (about 10 gm.) was treated with 50 per +cent. alcohol and filtered. Very little dissolved in alcohol of this +strength, but on addition of lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol to the +solution, a light colored precipitate was formed, which became dark on +standing. It was filtered off, washed free from lead acetate, decomposed +by hydrogen sulphide, and shaken out with ether. The ether left, on +evaporation, a yellow resinous substance having a faint odor like +garlic. By drying in a desiccator, a small quantity of a solid yellow +resin was obtained which was completely soluble in alcohol. A very small +drop of this solution applied to the skin on the end of a glass rod +which had been drawn out to a point caused an eruption in about +thirty-six<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span> hours. Following the nomenclature used by Maisch and Pfaff, +this substance will be designated as <i>Toxicodendrin</i>, the ending "in" +indicating its glucoside nature.</p> + +<p>The filtrate from the lead precipitate just described was freed from the +excess of lead acetate by hydrogen sulphide, was tested for poison, and +was found to be poisonous, showing that the precipitation by lead +acetate was not complete even in 50 per cent. alcohol. On spontaneous +evaporation of the solution, a yellow, sweet smelling resin was left.</p> + +<p>A portion of the alcoholic solution of the toxicodendrin gave a dark +coloration with ferric chloride, did not reduce Fehling solution and was +slightly acid to litmus.</p> + +<p>To see whether the toxicodendrin could be hydrolyzed, the remainder was +dissolved in alcohol and dilute sulphuric acid was added. A fine, white +precipitate was formed at once which rose to the surface on standing as +a light flocculent substance. The mixture was heated for several days on +a water bath, filtered from unhydrolyzed resin and the filtrate was +neutralized and concentrated in the way already described. The solution +obtained reduced Fehling solution. Not enough was obtained for further +sugar tests, but all the hydrolysis experiments point to the conclusion +that the poisonous substance is a rhamnoside, and is the source of the +sugar in the plant.</p> + +<p>The reaction with ferric chloride observed whenever a lead compound of +the poison is decomposed by hydrogen sulphide may be explained by the +formation of traces of gallic acid or fisetin through the action of the +weak acids present.</p> + +<p>The supply of purified poisonous tar having been exhausted in the +preceding experiments, further study of the active principle is +postponed until more can be prepared. It is highly desirable to +investigate the white precipitate formed by addition of sulphuric acid +to an alcoholic solution of the toxicodendrin.</p> + + +<h4>OXIDATION OF THE PURIFIED TAR WITH NITRIC ACID.</h4> + +<p>When the purified poisonous material (p. 32) was extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol, only a small quantity was dissolved as was stated above. +The insoluble residue was treated with fuming nitric acid. Violent +reaction took place at once with copious evolution of red fumes and +heat. When the reaction was over, a sticky red gummy mass was left which +was slightly soluble in cold water and readily soluble in warm alcohol. +The water extract was yellow, and the alcoholic solution was red. That +the water extract contained picric acid was shown by the following +experiments:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span></p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(1) A portion was gently warmed with a few drops of a strong +solution of potassium cyanide and two drops of sodium +hydroxide. The red color of potassium isopurpurate was +formed.</p> + +<p>(2) A portion of the water solution was heated with glucose +and a few drops of sodium hydroxide. The deep red color of +picraminic acid was produced.</p> + +<p>(3) A few drops of an ammoniacal solution of copper sulphate +was added to the water extract. A yellow-green precipitate +was formed.</p> + +<p>(4) The water extract dyed silk, but did not dye cotton +cloth.</p></div> + + +<h4>DISTILLATION OF THE TAR WITH SODA LIME.</h4> + +<p>About 25 gm. of the tar left after extracting the original material with +hot water was dissolved in ether and poured into a glass retort +containing soda lime. The ether was distilled out, leaving the tar +intimately mixed with the soda lime. The retort was then gradually +heated. Vapors and liquid were given off, both of which turned red +litmus blue and had a strong odor like tobacco smoke. No odor of ammonia +was detected.<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a> At the high temperature of the triple burner, a +semi-solid, red, greasy substance collected in and closed the condenser +tube. This substance had the same powerful odor as the liquid portion of +the distillate. The clear, watery portion of the distillate was +separated from the thicker parts, and was found to contain pyrrol and +pyridine derivatives by the following characteristic tests:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>(1) Wood moistened with hydrochloric acid was turned red by +it.</p> + +<p>(2) Colorless fumes were formed when brought near +hydrochloric acid; mixed with hydrochloric acid, a red +insoluble substance was formed.</p> + +<p>(3) It precipitated the hydroxides of iron, gave a light +blue precipitate with copper sulphate, and a white +precipitate with mercuric chloride.</p></div> + +<p>The greasy, semi-solid mass was extracted with 10 per cent. hydrochloric +acid and filtered. On addition of a solution of mercuric chloride to the +red filtrate, a brown flocculent precipitate was formed. It was filtered +off and distilled with caustic soda, but the distillate did not contain +pyridine.</p> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span></p> + +<h3>POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE AS A REMEDY FOR RHUS POISONING.<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a></h3> + +<p>In the early stages of this work some experiments were made to see if +potassium permanganate could be used to purify the lead precipitate by +oxidizing the tar brought down in precipitation. It was found that the +permanganate attacked the lead precipitate as well as the other organic +matter in the vessel. This fact and the well-known value of permanganate +in treating skin diseases, its use as an antidote for some kinds of +alkaloid poisoning,<a name="FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a> as an antidote given to cattle poisoned by +plants,<a name="FNanchor_48_48" id="FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a> and as an antidote for snake bites,<a name="FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> suggested its use as +a remedy for Rhus poisoning. Maisch<a name="FNanchor_50_50" id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> mentioned that he had used it +with success, but it never came into general use, probably on account of +its staining the skin and clothing. In carrying out this work abundant +opportunities for testing its value as a remedy for the dermatitis +caused by poison ivy were afforded by many cases of accidental and +intentional poisoning. The best example of the latter was obtained with +the ether solution from the extraction of the lead precipitate in the +Soxhlet apparatus (page 28). After removing the ether, a small drop of +the residue was applied to the wrist as described. An itching red spot +about the size of a dime was noticed in thirty-six hours, and it +steadily increased in size. Nearly two days after the application of the +poison, a dilute solution of potassium permanganate containing a little +caustic potash was rubbed into the spot until the pimples were +destroyed. A little black spot was left wherever there had been a +pimple, showing that the permanganate had been reduced to oxide in the +skin. The place was washed and nothing more was thought of it until the +morning following, when it was noticed that the wrist had commenced to +swell during the night, and the characteristic watery secretion was +running from the poisoned spot. More permanganate solution was applied +without potash and the wrist was bandaged, thinking that this would +prevent the spreading of the eruption, but it really facilitated +spreading by becoming saturated with the poisonous fluid and keeping it +in contact with a larger surface of skin. In the meantime the swelling +and inflammation had extended nearly to the elbow. The arm now had the +appearance of having been bitten by a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span> snake. To reduce the swelling it +was immersed in hot water. This seemed to bring out the eruption very +quickly and the blisters were treated with permanganate as fast as they +appeared. The swelling was reduced, but returned during the night. On +the evening following, the forearm was immersed in a bowl of hot +permanganate solution containing a little caustic potash. The solution +was kept as hot as could be borne for about half an hour. After this +bath, the poison was completely oxidized, for the swelling was reduced +and did not return, nor was there any fresh eruption. What appeared to +be a severe case of poisoning was thus cured very quickly. The use of +hot water not only reduces the swelling, but also helps to destroy the +poison. The action of permanganate is also more rapid at high +temperatures.</p> + +<p>The oxidizing power of permanganate, as is well known, is greater in +acid solution than in alkaline, five atoms of oxygen being available in +the former and three in the latter, according to these equations:</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">2 KMnO<sub>4</sub> + 3 H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> = K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + 2 MnSO<sub>4</sub> + 3 H<sub>2</sub>O + 5 O.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">2 KMnO<sub>4</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O = 2 MnO<sub>2</sub> + 2 KOH + 3 O.<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>Permanganate was used as a remedy in some cases mixed with dilute +sulphuric acid, and in others, with zinc sulphate; also with lime water. +It was found to be satisfactory whether used alone or with any of the +substances mentioned, provided it was well rubbed into the skin. The +concentration of the solution used was varied according to the location +and condition of the eruption. Where the skin was thin or already +broken, dilute solutions (one per cent.) were used. In one case, the +eruption appeared in the palm of the hand where the skin was so thick +that it was necessary to open it before the remedies could reach the +poison. The difficulty of getting the remedy in contact with the poison +in the skin is the reason why the eruption is hard to cure.</p> + +<p>The remedy most commonly used for this eruption is an alcoholic solution +of lead acetate. This remedy is unsatisfactory for the reason that its +action consists in depositing an unstable lead compound of the poison in +the skin where the conditions of moisture and temperature are favorable +for its decomposition, liberating the poison with all its irritant +properties. Moreover, alcoholic preparations should not be used because +the alcohol dissolves the poison and, on evaporation, leaves it spread +over a larger surface like a varnish. Potassium permanganate, however, +oxidizes the poison completely. The only objection to the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span> use of +permanganate of which the writer is aware is that it stains the skin. +The stain can be removed by vigorous scrubbing with soap, or it will +wear off gradually in a few days. It can be removed at once by certain +acids, but these should not be used by persons not familiar with their +action.</p> + +<p>With the knowledge of the facts mentioned, many solutions were tested +for poison by applying them to the skin, and when an eruption appeared, +it was cured quickly and permanently by rubbing in a permanganate +solution, usually mixed with dilute sulphuric acid.</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> Nitrogen was found very readily by the soda lime test in +the tar left after extracting the original material with 50 per cent. +alcohol, but was not found by the Lassaign test.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> Stevens. Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 255, June, 1905.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> Whenever it is stated in this paper that a solution was +poisonous or not poisonous, the test was made by the writer upon +himself.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> Liebig's Annalen, CXI, p. 215.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> Über Mategerbstoff, p. 20.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> Bull. Soc. Chim. (II), Vol. 2, 95 (1864).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> Berichte 19, 1735 (1886).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> Jour. Chem. Soc. 71, 1194 (1897).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Berichte 19, 1740.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Ibid. 1747; Annalen, 112, 97.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Biochem. Pflan. II, 521.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> Ann. de Chim. et de Phys., 6th Series, XXII, 76 (1891).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Treatise on Chem., Vol. III, Pt. III, 492.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Les Sucres; Chem. der Zuck.; Biochem. der Pflan.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> Chem. Zeit. 23, Rep. 177.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> Loc. cit. 1, 209.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> On standing several weeks, a small quantity of tar +separated out on the walls of the vessel, also a brown precipitate which +was filtered off, suspended in water, and hydrogen sulphide was being +passed in when an accident occurred and it was lost.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> "By warming with alkalies or barium hydroxide, rhamnose is +colored yellow." Chem. der Zuck. I, 177.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> Ibid. 188.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Ibid.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> Rayman, Sur L'Isodulcite, <i>Bull. Soc. Chim.</i> 47, 668 +(1887).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> Acides Gummiques.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> Berichte XX, pp. 1089, 1091, 1188, 2566.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Ann. de Chim. et de Phys. (6) XXII, 93 (1891).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> Biochem. der Pflan. I, 210.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> Comptes rendus CXV, 892.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> Amer. Chem. Jour. 28, 370.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 255 (June, 1905); 78, 53 (Feb., +1906).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> A wax obtained from <i>Rhus succedanea</i> was shown by Stahmer +to contain palmitic acid and glycerol in the form of glycerol palmitate. +<i>Annalen</i> 43, 343, (1842).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> See Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 256.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> This section is added in the hope that it may be of use to +others who are subject to this form of poisoning.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> Moor, N. Y. Med. Rec. 45 (1894), 200.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> Bull. No. 26, U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. of Bot. 47.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> Lacerda, Comptes rendus 93 (1881) 466-469.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> Amer. Jour. Med. Sci. 52 (1866), 285.</p></div> +</div> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>SUMMARY.</h2> + + +<p>Leaves and flowers of the poison ivy plant were extracted with ether and +the ether was removed by evaporation. In the residue, the following +substances were found and studied: gallic acid, fisetin, the sugar +rhamnose, and a poisonous tar, gum, or wax.</p> + +<p>The lead compound of the poison was soluble in ether; this fact gave a +means of separating the poisonous substance from the non-poisonous +matter in one operation.</p> + +<p>The poison was not volatile with vapor of acetic acid, or with vapor of +alcohol.</p> + +<p>The poisonous tar or wax was decomposed by acids and yielded gallic +acid, fisetin, and rhamnose, showing the probable source of these +compounds in the plant, and indicating that the poison is a complex +substance of a glucoside nature.</p> + +<p>It was found that a portion of the poisonous substance could be +precipitated by lead acetate from a solution of the purified tar in 50 +per cent. alcohol.</p> + +<p>All cases of poisoning developed on the writer were easily cured with +potassium permanganate.</p> + +<p>The following method is suggested for obtaining the poisonous substance +from the plant: Extract the plant with alcohol, filter, and precipitate +at once with lead acetate. Wash the precipitate, dry, and extract with +ether in Soxhlet extractors (loosely filled). Combine the ether +extracts, mix with water, and pass in hydrogen sulphide. Separate the +water and the ether solution, and filter the latter. Wash the ether +solution thoroughly by shaking with water, and then evaporate at a low +temperature.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span></p> +<h2>BIOGRAPHY.</h2> + + +<p>William Anderson Syme, the author of this dissertation, was born in +Raleigh, N. C., on July 11, 1879. He was prepared for college at the +Raleigh Male Academy, entered the North Carolina College of Agriculture +and Mechanic Arts in 1896, and was graduated in 1899 with the degree B. +S. He was an Instructor in Chemistry at the same College from January +1st, 1900, until June, 1903, when he received the degree M. S. for +graduate work. In October following, he entered Johns Hopkins University +as a graduate student in Chemistry, and was awarded one of the North +Carolina Scholarships. His minor subjects are Physical Chemistry and +Biology.</p> + + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy +Plant: (Rhus Toxicodendron), by William Anderson Syme + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SOME CONSTITUENTS--POISON IVY PLANT *** + +***** This file should be named 34510-h.htm or 34510-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/5/1/34510/ + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Josephine Paolucci and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This +book was produced from scanned images of public domain +material from the Google Print project.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/34510-h/images/fisetin.jpg b/34510-h/images/fisetin.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..640aad2 --- /dev/null +++ b/34510-h/images/fisetin.jpg diff --git a/34510-h/images/i_08a.jpg b/34510-h/images/i_08a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3e0a435 --- /dev/null +++ b/34510-h/images/i_08a.jpg diff --git a/34510-h/images/i_09a.jpg b/34510-h/images/i_09a.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3a58ce0 --- /dev/null +++ b/34510-h/images/i_09a.jpg diff --git a/34510.txt b/34510.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ff6adda --- /dev/null +++ b/34510.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1941 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy Plant: +(Rhus Toxicodendron), by William Anderson Syme + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy Plant: (Rhus Toxicodendron) + +Author: William Anderson Syme + +Release Date: November 30, 2010 [EBook #34510] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SOME CONSTITUENTS--POISON IVY PLANT *** + + + + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Josephine Paolucci and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This +book was produced from scanned images of public domain +material from the Google Print project.) + + + + + + + + +SOME CONSTITUENTS OF THE POISON IVY PLANT (RHUS TOXICODENDRON) + +DISSERTATION + +SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF UNIVERSITY STUDIES OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS +UNIVERSITY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR +OF PHILOSOPHY + +BY WILLIAM ANDERSON SYME + +1906 + +1906 +THE SUN JOB PRINTING OFFICE +BALTIMORE + +Transcriber's Note: Underscores around words indicates italics while an +underscore and curly brackets in an equation indicates a subscript. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + +Acknowledgments 4 + +Literature 5 + +Introduction 7 + +Work of Khittel 11 + +Work of Maisch 12 + +Work of Pfaff 13 + +Experimental 14 + + Gallic Acid 18 + + Fisetin 20 + + Rhamnose 23 + + The Poison 28 + + Potassium Permanganate as a Remedy for Rhus Poisoning 35 + +Summary 37 + +Biography 38 + + + + +ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. + + +The author desires to avail himself of this opportunity to tender his +thanks to those under whose guidance he has worked while a student at +the Johns Hopkins University, namely to Professors Remsen, Morse, Jones, +and Andrews, and to Doctors Acree and Tingle for instruction in lecture +room and laboratory. + +He is especially indebted to Dr. S. F. Acree, at whose suggestion this +research work was undertaken, for counsel and assistance in its +prosecution. + +He would also thank Messrs. Parke, Davis and Co., of Detroit, Mich., for +the preparation of the crude material used in this investigation, and +the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., for electrotypes +of figures 17, 18, and 19 in Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany. + + + + +LITERATURE. + + +Acides Gummiques, Garros (Dissertation) 1895. + +American Chemical Journal. + +American Journal of the Medical Sciences. + +American Journal of Pharmacy. + +Annalen der Chemie und der Pharmacie (Liebig). + +Annales de Chimie et de Physique. + +Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft. + +Biochemie der Pflanzen (Czapek) 1905. + +Brooklyn Medical Journal. + +Bulletin de la Societe Chimique. + +Bulletins 20 and 26 U. S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Botany. + +Chemie der Zuckerarten, Von Lippmann, 1904. + +Chemiker-Zeitung. + +Comptes rendus. + +Industries of Japan, J. J. Rein. + +Journal of the Chemical Society. + +Journal of Experimental Medicine. + +Les Sucres, Maquenne, 1900. + +Manual of Botany, 6th Edition, Gray. + +Medical and Surgical Reporter. + +New York Medical Record. + +Proceedings of the American Pharmaceutical Association. + +Treatise on Chemistry, Roscoe and Schorlemmer. + +Ueber Mategerbstoff, Reuchlin (Dissertation) 1904. + + + + +SOME CONSTITUENTS OF THE POISON IVY PLANT. + +(RHUS TOXICODENDRON) + + + + +INTRODUCTION. + + +Plants belonging to the natural order Anacardiaciae (Cashew family or +Sumach family) are found in all the temperate climates of the world and +quite frequently in semi-tropical climates. Many of these plants play +important parts in economic botany, yielding dye-stuffs, tanning +material, wax, varnish, and drugs. Several species are poisonous. At +least three poisonous species of the genus _Rhus_ are found in the +United States. These three are all common and well-known plants, but +confusion frequently arises concerning them on account of the different +names by which they are known in different localities. For example, +poison ivy (_Rhus toxicodendron_ or _Rhus radicans_) probably the best +known poisonous plant in America, being found in all the States except +those in the extreme West, is often confounded with and popularly called +"poison oak." The true poison oak is the _Rhus diversiloba_ of the +Western States.[1] The third and most poisonous species of this plant is +_Rhus venenata_ or _Rhus vernix_; it is the _Rhus vernicifera_ of Japan, +from which Japanese lac is obtained. It is popularly known in the United +States as "poison sumach," "poison dogwood" and "poison elder." It grows +in swamps from Canada to Florida. + +As the poison ivy is by far the most common of these plants in the +Eastern States, a brief description of it is given here:[2] A shrub +climbing by rootlets over rocks, etc., or ascending trees, or sometimes +low and erect; leaflets 3, rhombic-ovate, mostly pointed, and rather +downy beneath, variously notched, sinuate, or cut-lobed; high climbing +plants (_R. radicans_) having usually more entire leaves. It is found in +thickets, low grounds, etc. Greenish flowers appear in June. + +[Illustration: Fig. 1.--Poison ivy (_Rhus radicans_ or _Rhus +toxicodendron_). _a_, spray showing aerial rootlets and leaves; _b_, +fruit--both one-fourth natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)] + +[Illustration: Fig. 2.--Poison oak (_Rhus diversiloba_) showing leaves, +flowers, and fruit, one-third natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)] + +In the general description of the order Anacardiaciae, Gray[3] says: +"Juice or exhalations often poisonous." Whether it is contact with some +part of the plant, or with the exhalation from the plant, that causes +the well-known skin eruption has been a topic for discussion ever since +its source was known. On account of its intangible nature there has been +more speculation than experimental evidence bearing on this question, +although a few investigations have been made with the object of +isolating the poison. It is most generally believed that the exhalations +are poisonous. Dr. J. H. Hunt[4] states that the exhalations have been +collected in a jar and found to be capable of inflaming and blistering +the skin of an arm plunged into it. + +[Illustration: Fig. 3--Poison sumach (_Rhus vernix_), showing leaves, +fruit, and leaf-scars, one-fourth natural size. + +(Chesnut, Bulletin No. 20, Division of Botany, U. S. Department of +Agriculture.)] + +Prof. J. J. Rein,[5] in his treatise on Lacquer Work, describes the +poison of the Japanese lac tree, _Rhus vernicifera_, as being volatile, +as do also the Japanese chemist Yoshida[6] and the French chemist +Bertrand.[7] Recent work by Prof. A. B. Stevens,[8] however, seems to +show that this poison is not volatile, and is similar to, if not +identical with that obtained by Pfaff[9] from _Rhus toxicodendron_ and +_Rhus venenata_. + +Not many cases of internal poisoning by _Rhus toxicodendron_ are on +record in medical literature. Two cases of poisoning from eating the +fruit of this plant have been described.[10] The subjects of these cases +were two children who had eaten nearly a pint of the fruit. The symptoms +are described in detail, being in general, similar to those of +alkaloidal poisoning. Warm water was given to promote emesis; afterwards +large quantities of carbonate of soda were given in solution under the +belief that it was an antidote to the poison. Otherwise they were +treated on general principles. Both children recovered. + +Another case of internal poisoning is the following:[11] Three children +drank an infusion of the root of poison ivy thinking it was sassafras +tea. The first of these cases was diagnosed as measles, but on the +appearance of similar symptoms in the sisters of the first patient, the +cause of the trouble was found. All recovered. + +Dr. Pfaff[12] explains the few fatal cases that have followed Rhus +poisoning on the assumption that enough of the poison was absorbed +through the skin to cause renal complications in persons having chronic +kidney trouble. He showed that the poison, when given internally, +produces a marked effect on the kidneys, causing nephritis and fatty +degeneration of this organ. + +The irritating action of poison ivy has been attributed at different +times to the "exhalation," to a volatile alkaloid, to a volatile acid, +and to a non-volatile oil. Pfaff,[13] who made the most recent +investigation of this poison, obtained from the plant a non-volatile oil +having the same action on the skin as the plant itself. He found this +oil in all parts of the plant and concluded that it was the active +principle, and that one could be poisoned only by actual contact with +some part of the plant. He assumed minute quantities of pollen dust to +be in the air to account for the cases of "action at a distance" so +frequently quoted. Pfaff says: "In my opinion, it is more than doubtful +if ever a case of ivy poisoning has occurred without direct contact with +the plant or with some article that has been in contact with the plant. +The long latent period of the eruption in some cases may obviously +render mistakes extremely easy as to the occasion when contact with the +plant really occurred." Granting, however, that the active principle is +practically non-volatile when isolated from the plant, we cannot say +positively that it is not volatile in the juices of the plant, or under +the influence of vital forces. It is quite conceivable that the water +transpired by the leaves of the plant may carry with it a quantity of +the poison sufficient to produce the dermatitis on a person very +susceptible to its action. It is also conceivable that a volatile poison +manufactured by a living plant could become non-volatile by changes in +it consequent upon the death of the plant. + +Up to the present time, only three important chemical investigations of +the active principle of _Rhus toxicodendron_ have appeared in medical +and chemical literature, these being the researches of Dr. J. Khittel, +J. M. Maisch, a pharmacist, and Dr. Franz Pfaff, of the Harvard +University Medical School, to whose work reference has been frequently +made. The chemical work of these investigators and their conclusions are +given here in some detail for the sake of completeness. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[1] Chesnut. Bull. No. 20, U. S. Dept. of Agr., Div. of Botany. + +[2] Man. of Bot., p. 119. + +[3] Man. of Bot., p. 119. + +[4] Brook. Med. Jour., June, 1897. + +[5] Rein, The Ind. of Jap., p. 338, et seq. + +[6] H. Yoshida on Urushi Lacquer, Jour. Chem. Soc., 1883, p. 472. + +[7] Ann. de Chem. et de Phys., Series VII, Vol. 12, p. 125, 1897. + +[8] Amer. Jour. Pharm. 78, p. 53, Feb., 1906. + +[9] An account of Pfaff's work will be found in another part of this +paper. + +[10] Amer. Jour. Med. Sci. 51 (1866), p. 560. + +[11] Med. and Surg. Rep. 17, Nov., 1867. + +[12] Jour. Exp. Med. 2 (1897), p. 181. + +[13] Ibid. + + + + +KHITTEL'S INVESTIGATION. + + +The first attempt to find the poisonous constituent of this plant was +made by Khittel in 1857. His work was published in _Wittstein's +Vierteljahrresschrift fuer praktische Pharmacie_, VII, 348-359.[14] +Khittel obtained 37-1/2 ounces of fresh leaves of poison ivy from the +botanical garden in Munich, dried them, and got a residue of 9-1/2 +ounces which he analyzed. Not detecting anything to which the poisonous +qualities of the plant could be attributed, he made another series of +experiments which, as he thought, showed that a volatile alkaloid is the +poisonous constituent. It was obtained by the following process: "3 +ounces of the powdered leaves were infused with hot distilled water, +after three days strained, expressed, the liquid evaporated to 3 ounces, +and with the addition of potassa, carefully distilled to one-half. The +clear, colorless distillate had an alkaline reaction, and an odor +resembling henbane or hemlock. It was saturated with sulphuric acid, +evaporated, and treated with a mixture of equal quantities of alcohol +and ether which left sulphate of ammonia behind, the solution was +evaporated spontaneously, distilled with potassa, the alkaline +distillate neutralized with hydrochloric acid, and a precipitate could +now be obtained with chloride of platinum. Want of material prevented +further experiments." + +The editor of the _American Journal of Pharmacy_ inserts the following +note: "It would have been more satisfactory if the author had given some +physiological evidence of the poisonous nature of the alkaloid +substance obtained. It is quite interesting to hear that the hitherto +intangible venom of this plant has at last been detected." + +FOOTNOTES: + +[14] A free translation of this paper is given in Amer. Jour. Pharm. for +1858, p. 542. + + + + +WORK OF MAISCH.[15] + + +The next investigation of this plant was made by Maisch in 1864. He +criticizes Khittel's experiments as follows: "It is well known that the +_exhalations_ of _Rhus toxicodendron_ exert a poisonous influence on the +human body; the poisonous principle must, therefore, be volatile and, at +the same time, be naturally in such a loose state of combination as to +be continually eliminated and separated with the usual products of +vegetable exhalations. It is natural to suppose that during the process +of drying, the greatest portion of the poisonous principle should be +lost. The loss must be still greater if the dried leaves are powdered, a +hot infusion prepared from them, and this infusion evaporated down to +the original weight of the dried leaves. It is obvious that Dr. Khittel +could not have selected a better method for obtaining the least possible +quantity of the poisonous principle, if, indeed, it could be obtained by +this process at all." + +Maisch then worked up 8-3/4 ounces of the leaves of the plant in a way +to get the alkaloid, making some improvements on Khittel's method, but +failed to find it. Believing that the poison was a volatile acid, he +enclosed some fresh leaves of the plant in a tin box with several test +papers. The blue litmus paper became red showing the presence of an +acid. He concluded from this experiment that the exhalations of the +leaves contained a volatile organic acid which he thought was the +poisonous substance. To determine this point, he prepared the acid in +larger quantity by macerating the leaves with water, expressing and +distilling the expressed juice. He was poisoned in doing this work +although he had not been affected by handling the living plant and had +considered himself immune. He obtained an acid which investigation +showed to be somewhat like formic acid, more like acetic acid, but +having some reactions different from both. "Taking all the reactions +together, it is unquestionably a new organic acid for which I propose +the name of _Toxicodendric Acid_," writes Maisch. He further says: "That +it is the principle to which poison oak owes its effects on the human +system was proved to my entire satisfaction by the copious eruption and +formation of numerous vesicles on the back of my hand, on the fingers, +wrists, and bare arms while I was distilling and operating with it. +Several persons coming into the room while I was engaged with it were +more or less poisoned by the vapours diffused in the room; and I even +transferred the poisonous effects to some persons, merely by shaking +hands with them. + +"The diluted acid, as obtained by me, and stronger solutions of its +salts, were applied to several persons, and eruptions were produced in +several instances, probably by the former, though not always, which was +most likely owing to the dilute state of the acid. Whenever this was +boiled, I always felt the same itching sensation in the face, and on the +bare arms, which I experience on continual exposure of my hands to the +juice of the plant." + +Toxicodendric acid was thought to be the active principle from the time +of Maisch's work until the investigation by Pfaff in 1895. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[15] Proc. Amer. Pharm. Assn. 1865, p. 166, and Amer. Jour. Pharm. 1866, +p. 4. + + + + +PFAFF'S WORK. + + +By far the most valuable work on _Rhus toxicodendron_ is that of Pfaff. +From a clinical study of Rhus poisoning, Pfaff came to the conclusion +that the poison must be a non-volatile skin irritant. The more volatile +the irritant, the quicker is its action on the skin. Formic acid acts +very quickly; acetic acid, less volatile than formic, acts more slowly, +but still much more quickly than poison ivy, the latent period of which +is usually from two to five days. Pfaff thought that the volatile acid +obtained by Maisch might have contained some of the poisonous principle +as an impurity, but that it would not produce the dermatitis if prepared +in a pure state. He therefore prepared a quantity of the acid by +distilling the finely divided fresh plant with steam. The yield was +increased by acidulating the mixture with sulphuric acid before the +distillation. The acid distillate so obtained was freed from a +non-poisonous oily substance by shaking the solution with ether. Barium +and sodium salts were made by neutralizing the acid, and were purified +by crystallization. Analysis showed them to be salts of acetic acid, and +they gave the characteristic tests for this acid. The toxicodendric acid +of Maisch was thus shown to be acetic acid, and was therefore not the +poisonous principle of the plant. + +Pfaff obtained the active principle by the following process: The plant +was extracted with alcohol, the alcohol was distilled off, and the +residue was taken up in ether. The ether solution was washed with water +and dilute sodium carbonate solution, and the ether was evaporated. An +oily, black, poisonous substance partly soluble in alcohol was obtained. +To get the active principle in a pure state, this residue was extracted +with alcohol and filtered and the filtrate was precipitated fractionally +by lead acetate. The final precipitates consisted of the lead compound +of the poison in a pure state. On decomposing the lead compounds with +ammonium sulphide, shaking out with ether, and letting the ether +evaporate spontaneously, a non-volatile oil was obtained which gave the +characteristic skin eruptions. The pure lead compounds made in different +preparations were analyzed and assigned the formula C_{21}H_{30}O_{4}Pb. +The oil itself was not analyzed. Pfaff proposed the name _Toxicodendrol_ +for the oil. He found that it was not volatile, was decomposed by heat, +was soluble in alcohol, ether, chloroform, benzene, etc., but insoluble +in water. Its effects upon the human skin were studied in many +experiments upon himself and others. It was shown that an exceedingly +minute quantity of the poison will produce the dermatitis, even 1/1000 +milligram applied in olive oil being active. The oil was given +internally to rabbits, its effects being most marked on the kidneys. + +The oil obtained by Pfaff from _Rhus venenata_ seemed to be identical +with that from _Rhus toxicodendron_. + + + + +EXPERIMENTAL. + + +The writer's investigation was undertaken with the object of attempting +to throw more light on the chemical nature of the poisonous substance +found in _Rhus toxicodendron_. Soon after commencing work, however, it +became apparent that the poison could be more intelligently studied if +the substances associated with it in the plant were first identified; +the scope of the work was therefore extended to an investigation of the +other constituents of the plant, and it was hoped that a knowledge of +the properties of these constituents would suggest a more economical way +of getting the poison than the method of fractional precipitation. + +The crude material for this work was prepared by Messrs. Parke, Davis & +Co., of Detroit, Mich., according to special instructions submitted to +them: 67-1/2 pounds of fresh leaves and flowers of poison ivy were +collected near Detroit and carefully inspected by a competent botanist. +This material was thoroughly macerated and put into ten-liter bottles +with ether. The mass was thoroughly shaken, water being added to make it +more mobile. The ether was then separated off and the extraction was +repeated three times in the same way to insure complete removal of the +toxicodendrol. The ether extracts were combined, thoroughly dried with +anhydrous sodium sulphate, and the ether was distilled off, the +temperature being kept below 40 deg. C. during the entire distillation. +The residue after the removal of the ether was a thick, black, tar-like +mass, weighing 3 pounds 11 ounces. In extracting the plant, about +twenty-four gallons of ether were used. It is a significant fact in +regard to the volatility of the poison that during the process of +preparing this material none of the employees engaged in the work were +in any way affected, since proper precautions were taken and the +utensils were handled with rubber gloves. + +The crude ether extract, which will be designated as the "original +material," was shipped to Baltimore in August and was kept in a cool +place until November when the investigation was begun. When the bottle +was opened, there seemed to be an escape of a vapor, and a nauseating +odor suggesting crushed green leaves pervaded the atmosphere. Some days +later, irregular red patches appeared on the face though a mask of +cotton cloth was worn during the work, and the hands were protected by +rubber gloves. + +Assuming from Pfaff's work that this original material contained the +non-volatile oil toxicodendrol, the first experiment was to try to +distil it out under diminished pressure. For this purpose, an Anschuetze +distilling bulb containing ten grams of the tar was connected with a +vacuum pump. After a pressure of 2 mm. had been established the bulb was +gradually heated in a bath of Wood's metal. Nothing distilled over. The +material began to carbonize at a temperature of 140 deg. to 150 deg. + +It was then thought that perhaps the oil could be converted into an +ester which might be more volatile and could be distilled out. 20 grams +of the original material were dissolved in 100 cc. of absolute alcohol +containing 3 grains of hydrochloric acid gas, and the mixture was heated +10 hours on a water-bath under a return condenser. After the heating, +the mixture had a delightful ethereal odor. The flask was corked and +left standing several weeks while other work was in progress. The ester +solution was then put in a vacuum desiccator over sulphuric acid and the +alcohol evaporated. A black, tarry, solid mass was left having the ester +odor. It was extracted with warm water and filtered from insoluble tar. +The filtrate had a green color and the ethereal odor. It was shaken out +with ether; the ether layer had a blood-red color while the water layer +was deep green. The extraction with ether was continued until the water +layer was no longer green. The combined ether extracts were evaporated +in a desiccator without heat. A black tar-like solid was left very much +like the original material, but it had the ester odor. It was partly +soluble in water and readily soluble in alcohol. The alcoholic solution +was tested on the skin and found to be not poisonous. The ester, or +mixture of esters, was not investigated further in this connection, but +was later shown to give the reactions for gallic acid and methyl +furfurol. These reactions will be referred to in connection with other +experiments. + +After a few other preliminary experiments, it became evident that the +original material was a complex mixture of substances and that it would +have to be fractionated by some means and the fractions studied +separately. + +A portion of the original substance was treated with 50 per cent. +alcohol and was found to be partly soluble in this medium. The solution +was filtered from insoluble tar. A portion of the yellow filtrate gave a +reddish yellow precipitate with lead acetate. The alcoholic solution was +distilled in an Anschuetze flask under diminished pressure; a yellow +liquid condensed in the arm of the flask while most of the alcohol was +collected in a bottle connected with the arm. The yellow liquid was acid +to litmus. Water was added, the solution was shaken out with ether and +the ether was evaporated. When the small residue was completely dry, it +was a yellow solid soluble in dilute alcohol and acid to litmus. The +substance was not volatile enough to justify the use of this method for +getting it. + +Chlorophyll could not be removed from the original substance because the +solvents for chlorophyll such as alcohol, ether, fats, petroleum, and +carbon bisulphide dissolve large quantities of the mixture. + +A precipitate obtained by adding lead acetate to a filtered solution of +the original substance in 50 per cent. alcohol was suspended in water, +decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, shaken out with ether and the ether +evaporated. The residue appeared at first to be a yellow oil, but on +complete evaporation of the ether in a desiccator, a yellow solid was +obtained--apparently the same as that obtained by vacuum distillation. + +A solution of the original material in 50 per cent. alcohol was filtered +through bone-black and the filtrate was colorless. Examination showed +that everything had been removed by the bone-black and the filtrate was +apparently pure alcohol and water. + +In precipitating an alcoholic solution of the crude material with a +solution of lead acetate, it was noticed that at least two kinds of +precipitates were formed. The part that went down first was darker in +color than that thrown down later. Pfaff used the last fractions in +obtaining his oil and stated that these precipitates consisted of the +lead compound of the oil in a pure state. It was found by experiment +that the darker part was soluble in ether while the lighter part was +not. This indicated that the darker part consisted of tarry matter which +was brought down mechanically or separated out when the alcoholic +solution was diluted by the lead acetate solution, or was perhaps a lead +compound soluble in ether. To test this point an experiment was made as +follows: Some of the crude material was thoroughly extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol. The tar insoluble in 50 per cent. alcohol was then +treated with 95 per cent. alcohol; most of it dissolved; the solution +was filtered and lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol was added. A +greenish colored precipitate was formed which was filtered off and found +to be completely soluble in ether and soluble to a considerable extent +in strong alcohol. These experiments suggested that the light colored +lead compound which was thought to contain the poison could be purified +by extraction with ether in a Soxhlet apparatus more conveniently than +by the tedious process of fractional precipitation. Further preliminary +experiments showed that 50 per cent. alcohol extracted from the original +material all of the substance or substances which gave the light colored +precipitate and dissolved only a small amount of the tar. + +Two hundred and eighty-eight grams of the crude material were then +extracted several times with 50 per cent. alcohol and filtered; the +insoluble tar was washed and saved for examination. To the filtrate was +added an excess of a solution of lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol. +The large precipitate, which will be designated as "precipitate A," was +filtered and drained by suction in a Buechner funnel. The alcoholic +"filtrate A" was saved. Precipitate A was extracted with ether in +Soxhlet extractors until the ether came over practically colorless, the +operation being interrupted from time to time to stir up the precipitate +in the thimble. The green colored ether solution was saved for future +examination. The lead precipitate, after extraction with ether and +drying, weighed about 116 grams. A portion of this lead compound was +decomposed by hydrogen sulphide in a mixture of water and ether which +was well shaken during the operation. The ether was separated, filtered, +and evaporated under diminished pressure without heat, and there +remained a yellow oily looking residue having a pleasant odor. When the +ether and water were completely removed in a vacuum desiccator, a hard, +brittle, yellow resin weighing about 16 grams was obtained. It was +soluble in alcohol, had a strong acid reaction and was free from +nitrogen[16] and sulphur. The nitrogen tests were made by the Lassaign +and soda lime methods,[17] and the sulphur test was made with sodium +nitroprusside after fusing the residue with sodium. The main portion of +the lead compound was decomposed under alcohol by hydrogen sulphide, +filtered, and the alcoholic filtrate evaporated in vacuo. The same +yellow acid resin was obtained. Experiments continuing through several +weeks were made in applying solutions of this resin to rats, rabbits and +guinea pigs. Finding it to be without effect upon these animals it was +tried on the writer and found to be not poisonous.[18] In the meantime +the resin was being studied in the laboratory. + + +GALLIC ACID. + +An alcoholic solution of the resin was just neutralized with potassium +hydroxide. During the titration, the solution rapidly became dark brown. +After neutralization it was shaken with ether; the water solution +remained brown while the ether layer was nearly colorless and contained +practically no dissolved substance. A portion of the water solution of +the potassium salt on being acidified with sulphuric acid and standing +over night, deposited a slight precipitate. The solution of the +potassium salt gave a heavy precipitate with lead acetate somewhat +similar to the original lead precipitate A, and also slight precipitates +with salts of zinc, mercury, copper, and silver (with reduction). It +gave a bluish-black color with impure ferrous sulphate and a dark color +with ferric chloride. It reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate and Fehling +solution. These experiments indicated the presence of a tannin compound. +An alcoholic solution of the resin gave the same color reactions with +iron salts as did the potassium salt. To determine which one of the +tannin compounds was present was a matter of some difficulty since the +di- and tri-hydroxybenzoic acids have in general the same color +reactions. The presence of other plant substances in the solution also +interferes with the color tests, and finally, a substance which gives a +blue color with iron salts and one giving a green color may be found +together in the same plant.[19] Further tests with a solution of the +resin in dilute alcohol, and with a water solution of the acid +precipitated by adding sulphuric acid to a solution of the resin in +potassium hydroxide, led to the conclusion that the acid is gallic acid. +These tests were the following: + +(1) Boiling with an excess of potassium hydroxide gave a black substance +(tauromelanic acid). + +(2) The acid was not precipitated by gelatin. + +(3) On addition of potassium cyanide a transitory red color appeared +which reappeared on shaking with air. + +Gallic acid is distinguished from tannic acid by tests (2) and (3). At +later stages in the work the potassium, barium, and sodium salts of +gallic acid were obtained, and finally the pure acid was made by +decomposing the sodium salt with sulphuric acid and crystallizing from +water. A portion of the acid so obtained was further purified by +dissolving in absolute alcohol and pouring into absolute ether.[20] The +melting point behavior of the acid corresponds with that of gallic acid; +it melted with decomposition at about 230 deg. For further identification, +some of the acid was converted into an ester by the following process: +it was dissolved in 80 per cent. alcohol, hydrochloric acid gas was +passed in, and the solution was heated an hour on the water bath. It was +then evaporated to a small bulk, neutralized with barium carbonate and +extracted with ether. The ether, on evaporation, left the ester which +was crystallized from water and dried in a desiccator over sulphuric +acid. The anhydrous ester agreed in melting point (156 deg. to 159 deg.) and +other properties with the ester of gallic acid described by Grimaux.[21] +For the sake of comparison, an ester was made from gallic acid obtained +from another source and the two agreed in properties. A mixture of the +two esters melted within the limits given for the ester of gallic acid. + +While the tests leading to the identification of gallic acid were being +made, another series of experiments was in progress. Eleven and one-half +grams of the resin obtained from lead precipitate A by decomposition +with hydrogen sulphide were treated with 0.1 n. potassium hydroxide +added from a burette until the acid was exactly neutralized. All went +into solution. On shaking with ether, some of the potassium salt +separated out and was saved for examination. The solution became brown +on exposure to air and got darker as the work proceeded. The acid in +solution as a potassium salt was precipitated out in four fractions by +adding for each fraction one-fourth the amount of 0.1 n. sulphuric acid +required to neutralize the potassium hydroxide used. The precipitates +were filtered off and examined. The first was small in amount, gummy and +hard to filter. The solution was shaken with ether after each +precipitate had been filtered off. The succeeding precipitates were in +better condition, but were not pure. All appeared to be impure gallic +acid which had become brown by absorption of oxygen. They were saved, +however, to be tested for poison. After the last fraction had separated, +the filtrate was shaken several times with ether and saved for further +examination, which will be described under "Rhamnose." This filtrate is +designated as B. + +At this stage of the work a portion of the resin obtained from lead +precipitate A was tested and found to be not poisonous as already +mentioned. By this test, all the substances contained in the lead +precipitate A after its extraction with ether in the Soxhlet apparatus, +were eliminated from the possible poisonous substances. The poison must +therefore have been extracted by the ether. + +A fresh portion of the original poisonous material was treated with 50 +per cent. alcohol and filtered from insoluble tar. The filtrate was +precipitated in six fractions by lead acetate. The last fractions were +lighter in color and apparently much purer than the first. The sixth +lead precipitate was decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, the light-yellow +water solution was tested and found to be not poisonous. It gave the +characteristic reactions for gallic acid. The poison, if precipitated at +all by lead acetate, must have gone down in one of the preceding +fractions. Later experiments showed that it is brought down partly +mechanically and partly as a lead compound in the first precipitates. + + +FISETIN. + +Having identified gallic acid, and not finding any other phenol +derivative in the lead precipitate, some of the original material was +extracted with hot water to remove gallic acid and filtered from tar +while hot. The filtrate had a deep yellow color. On cooling over night, +an olive green precipitate separated out which was dried and found to be +a light powder. It was practically insoluble in cold water, soluble +with great difficulty in boiling water from which it separated in yellow +flakes, slightly soluble in ether and in acetic acid, but readily +soluble in alcohol. The solutions were not acid to litmus, gave a dark +color with ferric chloride, an orange-red precipitate with lead acetate +which was easily soluble in acetic acid, and an orange-yellow +precipitate with stannous chloride. These properties and reactions +indicated that the substance was the dye-stuff fisetin and that it +occurs in the free state in this plant though it is usually found as a +glucoside of fisetin combined with tannic acid. A compound of this kind +was found in _Rhus cotinus_ and named "fustin-tannide" by Schmid[22]. He +showed that the fustin-tannide could be decomposed by acetic acid into +tannic acid and a glucoside, fustin C_{46}H_{42}O_{21}. Fustin, on +heating with dilute sulphuric acid, gave fisetin and a sugar supposed to +be rhamnose. Fisetin was also found as a glucoside compound in _Rhus +rhodanthema_ by Perkin.[23] + +The yellow substance which separated from the boiling water solution was +further purified by dissolving in a small quantity of hot alcohol and +adding hot water. On cooling, the yellow substance separated out in a +flocculent condition. Examined under the microscope, the flakes appeared +to be made up of masses of fine crystals. + +An alcoholic solution of the substance gave a black color with ammonia +which became red on addition of more ammonia. Concentrated acids +intensified the yellow color of the alcoholic solution. Fehling solution +and ammoniacal silver nitrate were reduced by it. Potassium hydroxide +added to an alcoholic solution gave at first a deep red color +accompanied by a green fluorescence which disappeared, leaving a yellow +liquid. With an excess of caustic potash, the red color returned and was +permanent. These reactions are characteristic for fisetin.[24] + +Furthermore, fisetin should give protocatechuic acid and phloroglucinol +by fusion with caustic potash under proper conditions.[25] The +experiment was carried out as follows: 2 grams of fisetin were gently +heated in a nickel crucible with 6 grams of caustic potash dissolved in +6 cc. water. An inflammable gas, apparently hydrogen, was evolved during +the fusion. The pasty mass was dissolved in water, acidified with +sulphuric acid, and filtered. The filtrate was shaken out with ether +containing one-fourth its volume of alcohol. The ether was evaporated +and the residue was extracted with warm water and filtered. Lead acetate +was added to the filtrate to precipitate protocatechuic acid, while +phloroglucinol remained in the filtrate from this precipitate. The lead +precipitate was suspended in water, decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, +filtered, and evaporated to obtain protocatechuic acid. That the +substance obtained was protocatechuic acid was shown by the following +characteristic tests: + +(1) It gave a greenish brown color with ferric chloride; on addition of +one drop of a dilute solution of sodium carbonate, the color became dark +blue; on adding more sodium carbonate the color became red. + +(2) A violet color was obtained when a solution of the acid was treated +with a drop of sodium carbonate solution and then with a drop of ferrous +sulphate. + +(3) It reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate. + +(4) It did not reduce Fehling solution. + +The filtrate supposed to contain phloroglucinol was treated with +hydrogen sulphide to remove lead, filtered, and shaken with ether. The +residue left on evaporating the ether was taken up in water. This +solution gave the following reactions characteristic for phloroglucinol: + +(1) It reduced both silver nitrate and Fehling solution. + +(2) It colored pine wood moistened with hydrochloric acid red. + +(3) It gave a red color with vanillin and hydrochloric acid, and + +(4) A deeper red color with oil of cloves and hydrochloric acid, +becoming purple on standing. + +(5) It gave a violet color with ferric chloride. + +The substance is then, without doubt, fisetin. The formula[26] of +fisetin is supposed to be C_{15}H_{10}O_{6}. + + +RHAMNOSE. + +It was stated above that Schmid obtained a sugar solution by the +decomposition of a fisetin-glucoside from _Rhus cotinus_, and Perkin +obtained the same from a glucoside in _Rhus rhodanthema_. These +investigators thought that the sugar was isodulcite or rhamnose, but +they did not isolate it on account of the small quantities of material +at their disposal. Moreover, the sugar is very hard to crystallize in +the presence of other soluble substances and is not found in large +quantity in plants. Maquenne[27] could obtain only 15 to 20 gm. of +rhamnose by working up 1 kilogram of the berries of _Rhamnus +infectorius_. Assuming that the free fisetin found in poison ivy leaves +had its origin in the decomposition of a fisetin-glucoside by natural +processes, it was reasonable to suppose that the sugar would also be +found in the free state, although, according to Roscoe and +Schorlemmer:[28] "Isodulcite does not occur in the free state in nature, +but is found as a peculiar ethereal salt belonging to the class of +glucosides. On boiling with dilute sulphuric acid, this splits up into +isodulcite and other bodies...." The more recent works on the sugars and +on plant chemistry[29] mention the occurrence of rhamnose only in the +glucoside form, with one possible exception. The exception referred to +is the occurrence of a free sugar, supposed to be rhamnose, in a certain +palm-wine.[30] Czapek says:[31] "The well-known methyl pentoses do not +occur in the free state in plant organisms so far as we know." + +Since rhamnose forms a lead compound, the sugar, if present, should be +found in the first lead precipitate, A, and also in filtrate A in case +it is not completely precipitated in the presence of acetic acid and +alcohol. + +The filtrate A (about two liters) was examined first. It had a light +yellow color, contained an excess of lead acetate, and was acid from the +acetic acid liberated in the precipitation of the lead compound A.[32] +This filtrate was evaporated to dryness under diminished pressure to +remove alcohol, water, and acetic acid. The clear distillate had a +peculiar odor suggesting both tea and amyl formate. It was saved for +examination and was found to be not poisonous. The residue in the dish +after evaporation was a tough reddish brown, gummy mass which could be +drawn out into fine threads. It had a pleasant sweet odor. It was +extracted several times with hot water, each portion being filtered. A +brownish yellow powder remained undissolved and was saved. The combined +filtrates deposited more of the yellow solid on standing. This powder +will be referred to later as "P." The filtered liquid was freed from +lead by hydrogen sulphide. The solution then had a lemon yellow color, a +sweet odor and was acid from acetic acid. On concentrating the solution +by evaporation and making a small portion of it alkaline with sodium +hydroxide, the yellow color came out very intense[33]. The alkaline +solution reduced Fehling solution and ammoniacal silver nitrate, +indicating the presence of a sugar. Another portion of the solution gave +a slight precipitate with phenyl hydrazine in the cold. The remainder of +the solution was evaporated to dryness, extracted with water, filtered, +and again evaporated. A dark sticky syrup was left which was only partly +soluble in water. This was treated with water, filtered, and the +filtrate was evaporated, the water being replaced from time to time to +remove acetic acid. Finally the liquid gave the following tests for +rhamnose, besides those already mentioned: + +(1) With alpha-naphthol[34] and sulphuric acid, a purple violet +color. + +(2) With thymol[35] and sulphuric acid, a red color. + +(3) With resorcinol[36] and sulphuric acid, red color. + +(4) With orcinol[37] and hydrochloric acid, red color. + +(5) With ammonium picrate and sodium picrate, yellowish red color. + +(6) With phloroglucinol and hydrochloric acid, red color. + +(7) It decolorized an alkaline solution of potassium ferricyanide. + +(8) It gave a white precipitate with lead acetate. + +The filtrate B (p. 20) from which gallic acid was precipitated by +sulphuric acid in four fractions was saved to examine for sugar. To +remove gallic acid completely, and other vegetable matter, it was shaken +out several times with ether, and was kept at a low temperature with +salt and ice for a long time. It was left standing for several weeks, +during which time more brown matter separated out and was filtered off. +The filtrate was evaporated to a small bulk, cooled, and filtered from +crystals of potassium sulphate. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness, +the residue taken up in water and filtered through bone-black. Addition +of alcohol caused complete precipitation of potassium sulphate. The +solution then gave the above mentioned characteristic tests for +rhamnose. + +All attempts to get the osazone of the sugar by the method of +Fischer[38] failed, probably on account of the small quantity of the +sugar present. The plant, it will be remembered, was originally +extracted with ether in which rhamnose is practically insoluble. The +above described tests, however, can leave no doubt as to the identity of +the sugar. + +Additional evidence that the sugar is rhamnose was obtained by a method +described by Maquenne[39] as follows: + + "The production of methyl furfurol in the dehydration of + isodulcite furnishes a very simple means of characterizing + this sugar in mixtures which contain it; it is sufficient, + for example, to distil 50 gm. of quercitron wood with as + much sulphuric acid and about 150 gm. of water, then to + rectify the liquid obtained in order to get several drops of + the crude furfurol, which on addition of alcohol and + concentrated sulphuric acid gives immediately the green + coloration characteristic of methyl furfurol. This procedure + is applicable to extracts as well as to entire plants, and + has the advantage that it does not require the separation of + isodulcite, the crystallization of which is often very slow + and at times impossible when it is mixed with other very + soluble substances." + +The experiment was tried with the crude ether extract of the plant +according to the directions of Maquenne, and the green color with +alcohol and sulphuric acid was obtained from the thicker oily portion of +the distillate. This test can be made with hydrochloric acid[40] as well +as with sulphuric. Therefore the color test was tried with the ester +mixture prepared in one of the early experiments by boiling the original +plant material with hydrochloric acid and alcohol. Methyl furfurol was +found here also, this method indeed giving better results than that of +Maquenne. + +The presence of free rhamnose has thus been shown in the original +material, in the first precipitate by lead acetate, and in the filtrate +from this precipitate. Experiments to be described under "The Poison" +showed that the ether extract from the Soxhlet apparatus contained a +substance which yielded rhamnose when hydrolyzed by dilute sulphuric +acid. + +The presence of free gallic acid, fisetin, and rhamnose in the plant can +be readily explained by a series of assumptions for which there is a +considerable amount of experimental evidence. There is reason to believe +that tannin-like bodies are formed at the expense of chlorophyll,[41] +that complex tannin bodies can be broken down by acetic acid (also found +in _Rhus toxicodendron_) into a tannic acid and a glucoside (for +example, the "fustin-tannide" mentioned above yields tannic acid and +fisetin-glucoside); and finally that the glucoside can be hydrolyzed by +acids or enzymes giving, in the sumach plants, fisetin and rhamnose. + +Nitrogenous ferments which can effect the hydrolysis of glucosides and +give rise to sugars are frequently found in plants, for example, emulsin +in almonds, myrosin in mustard, and erythrozym in madder. Acree and +Hinkins[42] found that diastase, pancreatin, and a number of other +enzymes cause hydrolysis of triacetyl glucose with the formation of +glucose and acetic acid. Stevens[43] obtained a nitrogenous oxidizing +enzyme from _Rhus vernicifera_. The close relationship between the +poisonous species of _Rhus_ would lead us to suppose that the same +soluble ferment exists in poison ivy, though it was not detected in the +original material used in these experiments, probably because the plant +was extracted with ether in which the enzyme is insoluble. The existence +of such a soluble ferment would explain the presence of free sugar and +free fisetin. + + +EVIDENCE OF THE PRESENCE OF A FATTY ACID IN FILTRATE A. + +The brown substance P, obtained from filtrate A by evaporation and +extracting the residue with hot water, was suspended in warm water and +dilute sulphuric was added. A white precipitate was formed and a strong +fatty acid odor was developed. After the mixture had been heated for +some hours on the water bath a small portion was made alkaline and it +reduced Fehling solution. The main solution was filtered and the +precipitate supposed to be a fatty acid was saved. The filtrate was +neutralized with barium carbonate, filtered, evaporated, freed from +caramel, and the solution then gave the tests mentioned above for +rhamnose. + +A portion of the precipitate supposed to be a fatty acid was ignited in +a porcelain spoon. It fused, carbonized, and burned. The remainder was +heated with alcoholic potash and reprecipitated with hydrochloric acid. +The precipitate was washed and heated with alcohol. Part of it +dissolved. The insoluble part was found to be a lead compound. On +boiling it with hydrochloric acid and cooling, lead chloride +crystallized out. This was confirmed by dissolving the lead chloride in +hot water and precipitating as lead sulphide. These experiments were not +carried farther on account of the small quantity of material, but they +show that the gummy substance obtained from filtrate A contained +rhamnose (either as a lead compound of free sugar or as a lead compound +of a rhamnoside), and also, most probably, the lead compound of an +organic acid.[44] + + +THE FRAGRANT DISTILLATE. + +Several times in the course of this work, extracts of the original plant +material in alcohol and in water were distilled under diminished +pressure for the purpose of concentrating the solutions. The distillate, +in every case, had an ethereal odor suggesting amyl formate in very +dilute solution, but was more fragrant. The distillate from a water +extract was examined. It was a clear liquid, a little darker than pure +water, was not poisonous, was neutral to litmus paper, gave no color +with ferric chloride, reduced ammoniacal silver nitrate, but not Fehling +solution, and gave a faint red color with dilute ammonium hydroxide and +with sodium carbonate. + +A small quantity of a finely divided black precipitate separated out +from the water distillate on standing. + +The substance with the fragrant odor was extracted by shaking the +distillate with ether and letting the ether evaporate spontaneously. A +very small quantity of a yellow solid was deposited on the sides of the +dish. This substance had a strong and persistent odor, so sweet as to be +almost nauseating. Not enough was obtained for examination or analysis. +This fragrant residue was difficultly soluble in water and the solution +reduced silver nitrate in ammonia. A steam distillate of the original +plant material had the same fragrant odor as the distillate from a water +extract. + + +THE POISON. + +288 grams of the original poisonous material were extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol, and this alcoholic solution was precipitated with lead +acetate in the manner already described (p. 17). The lead precipitate so +obtained was extracted with ether in Soxhlet extractors and after the +extraction was found by test to be free from poison. Therefore the +poison, if precipitated by the lead acetate, must have been extracted by +the ether. This ether solution had a dark green color, and was acid from +acetic acid brought down in the lead precipitate. The ether was +evaporated in a vacuum desiccator without heat and there remained a +small quantity of an acid mixture of water and a soft tar; the watery +part was colored green, showing that the tar was soluble to some extent +in dilute acetic acid. The mixture had the peculiar odor of the original +material. A small drop of the green watery part was applied to the +wrist, allowed to remain a few minutes and was then removed by absorbent +paper, but the spot was not washed. Itching and reddening of the skin +commenced within twenty-four hours. At the end of forty-eight hours, +there was a well developed case of poisoning. How this was cured will be +described in another place. + +A small portion of the poisonous mixture was dissolved in alcohol, and +this solution was divided into three parts. The first part was treated +with ferric chloride, but it gave no color reaction. Another portion of +the alcoholic solution was diluted with water. It became turbid. The +third portion gave a dirty-green precipitate with lead acetate, which +seemed to come down more readily when the solution was diluted with +water. The main portion of the poisonous mixture was then dissolved in +95 per cent. alcohol and lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol was added. +The precipitate was filtered, washed, and decomposed by hydrogen +sulphide in a mixture of water and ether. The ether solution was +filtered and evaporated. The residue was a tar which, on standing in a +desiccator for some time, became dry enough to break into sticky lumps. +An alcoholic solution of this substance gave a dark color with ferric +chloride and a light colored precipitate with lead acetate. + +To get more of the poisonous tar for study, 233 grams of original +material were extracted with 95 per cent. alcohol. Strong alcohol was +used in order to dissolve as much of the tar as possible. The solution +had a dark greenish color, but was somewhat yellow in thin layers. The +undissolved tar was filtered off and extracted twice again in the same +way. The tar left after the third extraction was only slightly soluble +in alcohol, and its solution was not poisonous. The three filtrates from +these three extractions were precipitated separately by lead acetate in +50 per cent. alcohol. The first precipitate was largest, darkest in +color, and carried down more tarry matter. The second was light green, +and the third was quite small, black, and was not a lead compound at +all, but some of the tar which separated out on diluting the strong +alcohol with the weaker grade containing lead acetate. It was soluble in +ether and less soluble in alcohol. The alcoholic solution of this third +lot gave no precipitate with hydrogen sulphide. The first and second +lead precipitates were filtered by suction and washed with water. They +were kept a day or two in a desiccator over sulphuric acid, but did not +become completely dry. The weight of these two moist precipitates +together was 172 grams. They were combined and extracted with ether in +Soxhlet extractors which were kept in operation during work hours for +three days. + +In the meantime the alcoholic filtrates from these lead precipitates +were combined and concentrated on the water bath by distilling off two +liters of alcohol. The alcohol obtained had the peculiar odor of the +original material, but was not poisonous. + +After a long extraction of the lead precipitate in the Soxhlet +extractors, the green ether solutions were combined and washed by +shaking them with water to remove lead acetate and acetic acid in case +any should have been held in the lead precipitate. The ether was +distilled off at a low temperature and there remained a soft tar, a +portion of which was not completely soluble in 95 per cent. alcohol. The +alcoholic solution had a greenish yellow color and was poisonous. The +tar was also partly soluble in acetic acid, and this solution was found +to contain lead. Thinking that the lead acetate had not been completely +washed out, the main part of the tar was dissolved in ether and shaken +with water. The wash water continued to give a test for lead as long as +the washing was continued. This indicated probably the hydrolysis of an +unstable lead compound. Hydrogen sulphide was passed into the ether +solution mixed with water to remove the lead. Lead sulphide was filtered +off, and the ether was evaporated. A small portion of the tar residue in +alcoholic solution gave a color reaction with ferric chloride. As this +may have been due to traces of lead gallate dissolved in the extraction +with ether and afterwards decomposed by hydrogen sulphide, the main +portion of the tar was redissolved in ether and shaken with water until +it no longer reacted with ferric chloride. The ether was then evaporated +and a soft, black, poisonous tar or gum of uniform consistency was left +which was shown by tests to be free from gallic acid and lead. These +experiments showed that some of the poison was precipitated as a lead +compound soluble in ether and some was brought down mechanically in the +free state. To see if the extraction with ether in the Soxhlet apparatus +was complete, the residue in the thimbles was decomposed by hydrogen +sulphide and shaken with ether. The dark colored ether solution was +freed from gallic acid by shaking with water and dilute sodium carbonate +solution, and was evaporated. A small quantity of tar was obtained which +was added to the main portion. + +A solution of the poisonous tar in 95 per cent. alcohol did not reduce +Fehling solution and did not give a precipitate with lead acetate except +the separation of a small quantity of tar, which was not a lead +compound. The lead compound of the poison was apparently soluble in 95 +per cent. alcohol as well as in ether, for it would not precipitate in +this medium, although it was found in the original precipitate by lead +acetate. The alcoholic solution of the tar became turbid on diluting +with water. + +In order to see if the poison is volatile with vapor of acetic acid, +since this acid is found in the plant and it is thought by some that the +poison is volatile, a portion of the tar was distilled under diminished +pressure with acetic acid. It was soluble to some extent in the acid. +The temperature did not go higher than 55 deg. during the distillation. A +tube containing cotton wet with sweet oil was placed between the +receiver and the water suction so that the uncondensed vapors would have +to pass through the cotton. This cotton was rubbed on the skin and was +not poisonous. The yellow distillate collected in the receiver was also +tested and was not poisonous. + + +HYDROLYSIS OF THE POISON. + +About 5 grams of the poisonous tar free from gallic acid and sugar was +dissolved in alcohol, and dilute (2 per cent.) sulphuric acid was added. +Some of the tar separated out on diluting the alcohol with the acid. The +mixture was heated on a water bath during work hours for four days. A +purple and green fluorescent solution was formed, though much tar was +left apparently unchanged. The alcohol was evaporated off and the +solution was filtered from tar. The fluorescent filtrate was shaken +with ether, by which the green substance was removed, leaving the +solution purple. The ether left, on evaporation, a small quantity of a +green substance having a pleasant ester odor. It was not further +examined. A portion of the purple solution was exactly neutralized with +sodium carbonate. This solution gave a blue-black color with ferric +chloride which became red on addition of another drop of sodium +carbonate, indicating gallic acid. It also reduced Fehling solution. + +Another portion of the purple solution was made alkaline with sodium +carbonate. A reddish-brown flocculent precipitate was formed and was +filtered off. The filtrate did not give any color with ferric chloride, +but it reduced Fehling solution. It also gave the test for rhamnose with +alpha-naphthol. + +The main portion of the purple solution was made alkaline with sodium +carbonate; the precipitate was filtered off and dissolved in acetic +acid. This solution was yellow and gave a reaction with ferric chloride +similar to that of gallic acid. The filtrate from the precipitate by +sodium carbonate was concentrated by evaporation until sodium sulphate +began to crystallize out. Alcohol was added to precipitate the sodium +sulphate completely, the mixture was heated and filtered. The alcoholic +filtrate was concentrated to a syrup which reduced Fehling solution and +gave the characteristic tests for rhamnose already described. By this +hydrolysis, the tar was split up into rhamnose and some form of gallic +acid which could be precipitated by sodium carbonate. This compound, +whose acetic acid solution was yellow, probably contained fisetin also. +The reason for this last statement will appear from the following +experiment: + + +DECOMPOSITION OF THE POISON WITH ACETIC ACID. + +A portion of the poisonous tar was heated in an open dish with strong +acetic acid. The tar seemed to be decomposed to some extent, giving a +yellow substance. Acetic acid was added from time to time as it +evaporated. After several evaporations, water was added, the mixture was +heated to boiling and filtered. This filtrate No. 1 will be mentioned +later. The residue in the dish consisted of undecomposed tar and an +olive-green flaky substance. This substance was heated with a fresh +portion of glacial acetic acid. Water was added, and the mixture was +boiled and filtered. The filtrate had a deep yellow color suggesting +fisetin. It was shaken out with ethyl acetate which became colored +yellow. A portion of the ethyl acetate solution gave an orange red +precipitate with lead acetate showing the presence of fisetin. The ethyl +acetate was removed from the remainder of the solution by evaporation +and the yellow residue was taken up in alcohol. This alcoholic solution +gave the characteristic reactions for fisetin with stannous chloride, +with potassium hydroxide, with ferric chloride and with Fehling +solution. + +Filtrate No. 1 obtained by heating the poisonous tar with acetic acid +and hot water as described above was investigated as follows: A portion +of it gave a reddish colored precipitate with sodium carbonate as in the +case when the tar was hydrolyzed with sulphuric acid. The remainder was +nearly neutralized with sodium carbonate and lead acetate was added in +excess to remove gallic acid. The excess of lead was removed by +sulphuric acid, and the sulphuric acid was removed by barium carbonate. +The solution on evaporation reduced Fehling solution to some extent, but +a white precipitate was also formed. + +In this experiment, gallic acid and fisetin and probably sugar were +formed by decomposition of the poisonous gum with acetic acid, the acid +found in the plant by Pfaff. The presence of free gallic acid, fisetin +and rhamnose in the plant can therefore be explained by the natural +hydrolysis of a complex gum or tar or a constituent thereof. The +poisonous property is lost in the general rearrangement which takes +place during hydrolysis. + +The poisonous tar was not hydrolyzed by boiling with a dilute solution +of sodium carbonate. + +It was found, as has been stated elsewhere, that the lead compound of +the poison could not be precipitated in 95 per cent. alcohol. Further +experiments, however, showed that on extracting the poisonous gum with +50 per cent. alcohol, a portion of it dissolved, and this solution gave +a precipitate with lead acetate which was a true lead compound. The +remainder of the purified tar (about 10 gm.) was treated with 50 per +cent. alcohol and filtered. Very little dissolved in alcohol of this +strength, but on addition of lead acetate in 50 per cent. alcohol to the +solution, a light colored precipitate was formed, which became dark on +standing. It was filtered off, washed free from lead acetate, decomposed +by hydrogen sulphide, and shaken out with ether. The ether left, on +evaporation, a yellow resinous substance having a faint odor like +garlic. By drying in a desiccator, a small quantity of a solid yellow +resin was obtained which was completely soluble in alcohol. A very small +drop of this solution applied to the skin on the end of a glass rod +which had been drawn out to a point caused an eruption in about +thirty-six hours. Following the nomenclature used by Maisch and Pfaff, +this substance will be designated as _Toxicodendrin_, the ending "in" +indicating its glucoside nature. + +The filtrate from the lead precipitate just described was freed from the +excess of lead acetate by hydrogen sulphide, was tested for poison, and +was found to be poisonous, showing that the precipitation by lead +acetate was not complete even in 50 per cent. alcohol. On spontaneous +evaporation of the solution, a yellow, sweet smelling resin was left. + +A portion of the alcoholic solution of the toxicodendrin gave a dark +coloration with ferric chloride, did not reduce Fehling solution and was +slightly acid to litmus. + +To see whether the toxicodendrin could be hydrolyzed, the remainder was +dissolved in alcohol and dilute sulphuric acid was added. A fine, white +precipitate was formed at once which rose to the surface on standing as +a light flocculent substance. The mixture was heated for several days on +a water bath, filtered from unhydrolyzed resin and the filtrate was +neutralized and concentrated in the way already described. The solution +obtained reduced Fehling solution. Not enough was obtained for further +sugar tests, but all the hydrolysis experiments point to the conclusion +that the poisonous substance is a rhamnoside, and is the source of the +sugar in the plant. + +The reaction with ferric chloride observed whenever a lead compound of +the poison is decomposed by hydrogen sulphide may be explained by the +formation of traces of gallic acid or fisetin through the action of the +weak acids present. + +The supply of purified poisonous tar having been exhausted in the +preceding experiments, further study of the active principle is +postponed until more can be prepared. It is highly desirable to +investigate the white precipitate formed by addition of sulphuric acid +to an alcoholic solution of the toxicodendrin. + + +OXIDATION OF THE PURIFIED TAR WITH NITRIC ACID. + +When the purified poisonous material (p. 32) was extracted with 50 per +cent. alcohol, only a small quantity was dissolved as was stated above. +The insoluble residue was treated with fuming nitric acid. Violent +reaction took place at once with copious evolution of red fumes and +heat. When the reaction was over, a sticky red gummy mass was left which +was slightly soluble in cold water and readily soluble in warm alcohol. +The water extract was yellow, and the alcoholic solution was red. That +the water extract contained picric acid was shown by the following +experiments: + + (1) A portion was gently warmed with a few drops of a strong + solution of potassium cyanide and two drops of sodium + hydroxide. The red color of potassium isopurpurate was + formed. + + (2) A portion of the water solution was heated with glucose + and a few drops of sodium hydroxide. The deep red color of + picraminic acid was produced. + + (3) A few drops of an ammoniacal solution of copper sulphate + was added to the water extract. A yellow-green precipitate + was formed. + + (4) The water extract dyed silk, but did not dye cotton + cloth. + + +DISTILLATION OF THE TAR WITH SODA LIME. + +About 25 gm. of the tar left after extracting the original material with +hot water was dissolved in ether and poured into a glass retort +containing soda lime. The ether was distilled out, leaving the tar +intimately mixed with the soda lime. The retort was then gradually +heated. Vapors and liquid were given off, both of which turned red +litmus blue and had a strong odor like tobacco smoke. No odor of ammonia +was detected.[45] At the high temperature of the triple burner, a +semi-solid, red, greasy substance collected in and closed the condenser +tube. This substance had the same powerful odor as the liquid portion of +the distillate. The clear, watery portion of the distillate was +separated from the thicker parts, and was found to contain pyrrol and +pyridine derivatives by the following characteristic tests: + + (1) Wood moistened with hydrochloric acid was turned red by + it. + + (2) Colorless fumes were formed when brought near + hydrochloric acid; mixed with hydrochloric acid, a red + insoluble substance was formed. + + (3) It precipitated the hydroxides of iron, gave a light + blue precipitate with copper sulphate, and a white + precipitate with mercuric chloride. + +The greasy, semi-solid mass was extracted with 10 per cent. hydrochloric +acid and filtered. On addition of a solution of mercuric chloride to the +red filtrate, a brown flocculent precipitate was formed. It was filtered +off and distilled with caustic soda, but the distillate did not contain +pyridine. + + +POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE AS A REMEDY FOR RHUS POISONING.[46] + +In the early stages of this work some experiments were made to see if +potassium permanganate could be used to purify the lead precipitate by +oxidizing the tar brought down in precipitation. It was found that the +permanganate attacked the lead precipitate as well as the other organic +matter in the vessel. This fact and the well-known value of permanganate +in treating skin diseases, its use as an antidote for some kinds of +alkaloid poisoning,[47] as an antidote given to cattle poisoned by +plants,[48] and as an antidote for snake bites,[49] suggested its use as +a remedy for Rhus poisoning. Maisch[50] mentioned that he had used it +with success, but it never came into general use, probably on account of +its staining the skin and clothing. In carrying out this work abundant +opportunities for testing its value as a remedy for the dermatitis +caused by poison ivy were afforded by many cases of accidental and +intentional poisoning. The best example of the latter was obtained with +the ether solution from the extraction of the lead precipitate in the +Soxhlet apparatus (page 28). After removing the ether, a small drop of +the residue was applied to the wrist as described. An itching red spot +about the size of a dime was noticed in thirty-six hours, and it +steadily increased in size. Nearly two days after the application of the +poison, a dilute solution of potassium permanganate containing a little +caustic potash was rubbed into the spot until the pimples were +destroyed. A little black spot was left wherever there had been a +pimple, showing that the permanganate had been reduced to oxide in the +skin. The place was washed and nothing more was thought of it until the +morning following, when it was noticed that the wrist had commenced to +swell during the night, and the characteristic watery secretion was +running from the poisoned spot. More permanganate solution was applied +without potash and the wrist was bandaged, thinking that this would +prevent the spreading of the eruption, but it really facilitated +spreading by becoming saturated with the poisonous fluid and keeping it +in contact with a larger surface of skin. In the meantime the swelling +and inflammation had extended nearly to the elbow. The arm now had the +appearance of having been bitten by a snake. To reduce the swelling it +was immersed in hot water. This seemed to bring out the eruption very +quickly and the blisters were treated with permanganate as fast as they +appeared. The swelling was reduced, but returned during the night. On +the evening following, the forearm was immersed in a bowl of hot +permanganate solution containing a little caustic potash. The solution +was kept as hot as could be borne for about half an hour. After this +bath, the poison was completely oxidized, for the swelling was reduced +and did not return, nor was there any fresh eruption. What appeared to +be a severe case of poisoning was thus cured very quickly. The use of +hot water not only reduces the swelling, but also helps to destroy the +poison. The action of permanganate is also more rapid at high +temperatures. + +The oxidizing power of permanganate, as is well known, is greater in +acid solution than in alkaline, five atoms of oxygen being available in +the former and three in the latter, according to these equations: + + 2 KMnO_{4} + 3 H_{2}SO_{4} = K_{2}SO_{4} + 2 MnSO_{4} + 3 H_{2}O + 5 O. + 2 KMnO_{4} + H_{2}O = 2 MnO_{2} + 2 KOH + 3 O. + +Permanganate was used as a remedy in some cases mixed with dilute +sulphuric acid, and in others, with zinc sulphate; also with lime water. +It was found to be satisfactory whether used alone or with any of the +substances mentioned, provided it was well rubbed into the skin. The +concentration of the solution used was varied according to the location +and condition of the eruption. Where the skin was thin or already +broken, dilute solutions (one per cent.) were used. In one case, the +eruption appeared in the palm of the hand where the skin was so thick +that it was necessary to open it before the remedies could reach the +poison. The difficulty of getting the remedy in contact with the poison +in the skin is the reason why the eruption is hard to cure. + +The remedy most commonly used for this eruption is an alcoholic solution +of lead acetate. This remedy is unsatisfactory for the reason that its +action consists in depositing an unstable lead compound of the poison in +the skin where the conditions of moisture and temperature are favorable +for its decomposition, liberating the poison with all its irritant +properties. Moreover, alcoholic preparations should not be used because +the alcohol dissolves the poison and, on evaporation, leaves it spread +over a larger surface like a varnish. Potassium permanganate, however, +oxidizes the poison completely. The only objection to the use of +permanganate of which the writer is aware is that it stains the skin. +The stain can be removed by vigorous scrubbing with soap, or it will +wear off gradually in a few days. It can be removed at once by certain +acids, but these should not be used by persons not familiar with their +action. + +With the knowledge of the facts mentioned, many solutions were tested +for poison by applying them to the skin, and when an eruption appeared, +it was cured quickly and permanently by rubbing in a permanganate +solution, usually mixed with dilute sulphuric acid. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[16] Nitrogen was found very readily by the soda lime test in the tar +left after extracting the original material with 50 per cent. alcohol, +but was not found by the Lassaign test. + +[17] Stevens. Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 255, June, 1905. + +[18] Whenever it is stated in this paper that a solution was poisonous +or not poisonous, the test was made by the writer upon himself. + +[19] Liebig's Annalen, CXI, p. 215. + +[20] Ueber Mategerbstoff, p. 20. + +[21] Bull. Soc. Chim. (II), Vol. 2, 95 (1864). + +[22] Berichte 19, 1735 (1886). + +[23] Jour. Chem. Soc. 71, 1194 (1897). + +[24] Berichte 19, 1740. + +[25] Ibid. 1747; Annalen, 112, 97. + +[26] Biochem. Pflan. II, 521. + +[27] Ann. de Chim. et de Phys., 6th Series, XXII, 76 (1891). + +[28] Treatise on Chem., Vol. III, Pt. III, 492. + +[29] Les Sucres; Chem. der Zuck.; Biochem. der Pflan. + +[30] Chem. Zeit. 23, Rep. 177. + +[31] Loc. cit. 1, 209. + +[32] On standing several weeks, a small quantity of tar separated out on +the walls of the vessel, also a brown precipitate which was filtered +off, suspended in water, and hydrogen sulphide was being passed in when +an accident occurred and it was lost. + +[33] "By warming with alkalies or barium hydroxide, rhamnose is colored +yellow." Chem. der Zuck. I, 177. + +[34] Ibid. 188. + +[35] Ibid. + +[36] Rayman, Sur L'Isodulcite, _Bull. Soc. Chim._ 47, 668 (1887). + +[37] Acides Gummiques. + +[38] Berichte XX, pp. 1089, 1091, 1188, 2566. + +[39] Ann. de Chim. et de Phys. (6) XXII, 93 (1891). + +[40] Biochem. der Pflan. I, 210. + +[41] Comptes rendus CXV, 892. + +[42] Amer. Chem. Jour. 28, 370. + +[43] Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 255 (June, 1905); 78, 53 (Feb., 1906). + +[44] A wax obtained from _Rhus succedanea_ was shown by Stahmer to +contain palmitic acid and glycerol in the form of glycerol palmitate. +_Annalen_ 43, 343, (1842). + +[45] See Amer. Jour. Pharm. 77, 256. + +[46] This section is added in the hope that it may be of use to others +who are subject to this form of poisoning. + +[47] Moor, N. Y. Med. Rec. 45 (1894), 200. + +[48] Bull. No. 26, U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. of Bot. 47. + +[49] Lacerda, Comptes rendus 93 (1881) 466-469. + +[50] Amer. Jour. Med. Sci. 52 (1866), 285. + + + + +SUMMARY. + + +Leaves and flowers of the poison ivy plant were extracted with ether and +the ether was removed by evaporation. In the residue, the following +substances were found and studied: gallic acid, fisetin, the sugar +rhamnose, and a poisonous tar, gum, or wax. + +The lead compound of the poison was soluble in ether; this fact gave a +means of separating the poisonous substance from the non-poisonous +matter in one operation. + +The poison was not volatile with vapor of acetic acid, or with vapor of +alcohol. + +The poisonous tar or wax was decomposed by acids and yielded gallic +acid, fisetin, and rhamnose, showing the probable source of these +compounds in the plant, and indicating that the poison is a complex +substance of a glucoside nature. + +It was found that a portion of the poisonous substance could be +precipitated by lead acetate from a solution of the purified tar in 50 +per cent. alcohol. + +All cases of poisoning developed on the writer were easily cured with +potassium permanganate. + +The following method is suggested for obtaining the poisonous substance +from the plant: Extract the plant with alcohol, filter, and precipitate +at once with lead acetate. Wash the precipitate, dry, and extract with +ether in Soxhlet extractors (loosely filled). Combine the ether +extracts, mix with water, and pass in hydrogen sulphide. Separate the +water and the ether solution, and filter the latter. Wash the ether +solution thoroughly by shaking with water, and then evaporate at a low +temperature. + + + + +BIOGRAPHY. + + +William Anderson Syme, the author of this dissertation, was born in +Raleigh, N. C., on July 11, 1879. He was prepared for college at the +Raleigh Male Academy, entered the North Carolina College of Agriculture +and Mechanic Arts in 1896, and was graduated in 1899 with the degree B. +S. He was an Instructor in Chemistry at the same College from January +1st, 1900, until June, 1903, when he received the degree M. S. for +graduate work. In October following, he entered Johns Hopkins University +as a graduate student in Chemistry, and was awarded one of the North +Carolina Scholarships. His minor subjects are Physical Chemistry and +Biology. + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Some Constituents of the Poison Ivy +Plant: (Rhus Toxicodendron), by William Anderson Syme + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SOME CONSTITUENTS--POISON IVY PLANT *** + +***** This file should be named 34510.txt or 34510.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/5/1/34510/ + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Josephine Paolucci and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This +book was produced from scanned images of public domain +material from the Google Print project.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/34510.zip b/34510.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..478f134 --- /dev/null +++ b/34510.zip diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..79edddf --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #34510 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/34510) |
