summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--31428-pdf.pdfbin0 -> 1983992 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-pdf.zipbin0 -> 1645705 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t.zipbin0 -> 1137339 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/31428-t.tex17087
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/048a.pngbin0 -> 76171 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/049a.pngbin0 -> 60948 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/052a.pngbin0 -> 11851 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/113a.pngbin0 -> 24834 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/114a.pngbin0 -> 10764 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/121a.pngbin0 -> 1054 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/129a.pngbin0 -> 2600 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/150a.pngbin0 -> 23101 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/151a.pngbin0 -> 18480 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/154a.pngbin0 -> 33317 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/167a.pngbin0 -> 16317 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/171a.pngbin0 -> 12383 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/174a.pngbin0 -> 4209 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/175a.pngbin0 -> 27748 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/175b.pngbin0 -> 32617 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/188a.pngbin0 -> 19016 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/190a.pngbin0 -> 25625 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/192a.pngbin0 -> 42901 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/213a.pngbin0 -> 31414 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/216a.pngbin0 -> 6860 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/216b.pngbin0 -> 3036 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/216c.pngbin0 -> 2388 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/218a.pngbin0 -> 6608 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/218b.pngbin0 -> 1250 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/220a.pngbin0 -> 2565 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/236a.pngbin0 -> 24876 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/237a.pngbin0 -> 15103 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/256a.pngbin0 -> 2575 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/257a.pngbin0 -> 99242 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/258a.pngbin0 -> 34162 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/258b.pngbin0 -> 9029 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/258c.pngbin0 -> 24467 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/260a.pngbin0 -> 40017 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/277a.pngbin0 -> 5531 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/289a.pngbin0 -> 28605 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/297a.pngbin0 -> 78998 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/343a.pngbin0 -> 7549 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/images/357a.pngbin0 -> 5353 bytes
-rw-r--r--31428-t/old/31428-t.tex17081
-rw-r--r--31428-t/old/31428-t.zipbin0 -> 1137547 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
47 files changed, 34184 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/31428-pdf.pdf b/31428-pdf.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6511025
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-pdf.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-pdf.zip b/31428-pdf.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..30809c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-pdf.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t.zip b/31428-t.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cf8668e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/31428-t.tex b/31428-t/31428-t.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..290d255
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/31428-t.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,17087 @@
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl., by
+% Amos Emerson Dolbear %
+% %
+% This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with %
+% almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or %
+% re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included %
+% with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org %
+% %
+% %
+% Title: Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl. %
+% The Factors and Relations of Physical Science %
+% %
+% Author: Amos Emerson Dolbear %
+% %
+% Release Date: February 27, 2010 [EBook #31428] %
+% Most recently updated: June 11, 2021 %
+% %
+% Language: English %
+% %
+% Character set encoding: UTF-8 %
+% %
+% *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION *** %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\def\ebook{31428}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%% %%
+%% Packages and substitutions: %%
+%% %%
+%% book: Required. %%
+%% inputenc: Standard DP encoding. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% ifthen: Logical conditionals. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% amsmath: AMS mathematics enhancements. Required. %%
+%% amssymb: Additional mathematical symbols. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% alltt: Fixed-width font environment. Required. %%
+%% array: Enhanced tabular features. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% mathpazo: Postscript fonts. Required. %%
+%% yfonts: Gothic font on title page. Optional. %%
+%% %%
+%% perpage: Start footnote numbering on each page. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% multicol: Multi-column environment for index. Required. %%
+%% makeidx: Indexing capabilities. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% caption: More flexible figure caption styles. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% graphicx: Standard interface for graphics inclusion. Required. %%
+%% wrapfig: Illustrations surrounded by text. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% indentfirst: Indent first word of each sectional unit. Optional. %%
+%% textcase: Apply \MakeUppercase (et al.) only to text, not math. %%
+%% Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% calc: Length calculations. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% fancyhdr: Enhanced running headers and footers. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% geometry: Enhanced page layout package. Required. %%
+%% hyperref: Hypertext embellishments for pdf output. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Producer's Comments: %%
+%% %%
+%% Changes are noted in this file in three ways. %%
+%% 1. \DPnote{} for questionable but unchanged items. %%
+%% 2. \DPtypo{}{} for typographical corrections, showing %%
+%% original and replacement text side-by-side. %%
+%% 3. [** PP: Note]s for other comments. %%
+%% %%
+%% The original index contains entries out of alphabetical order, %%
+%% as well as entries seemingly pointing to the wrong page. %%
+%% %%
+%% In this ebook, \index macros are generally placed immediately %%
+%% following the page separator for the folio of the original %%
+%% index entry. A relatively large number of index hyperlinks in %%
+%% this ebook may, as a result, point to an incorrect location, %%
+%% off by more than half a page. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compilation Flags: %%
+%% %%
+%% The following behavior may be controlled by boolean flags. %%
+%% %%
+%% ForPrinting (false by default): %%
+%% Compile a screen-optimized PDF file. Set to false for print- %%
+%% optimized file (pages cropped, one-sided, blue hyperlinks). %%
+%% %%
+%% ShowOriginalFolios (false by default): %%
+%% Compile marginal notes showing folio numbers in the original %%
+%% printed book. May show only notes in the right margin in the %%
+%% screen-optimized version. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Things to Check: %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Spellcheck: .................................. OK %%
+%% Smoothreading pool: ......................... yes %%
+%% %%
+%% lacheck: ..................................... OK %%
+%% Numerous false positives %%
+%% %%
+%% PDF pages: 518 (if ForPrinting set to false) %%
+%% PDF page size: 4.5 x 7" %%
+%% PDF bookmarks: created %%
+%% PDF document info: filled in %%
+%% Images: 38 png files %%
+%% %%
+%% Summary of log file: %%
+%% * One overfull hbox (0.2pt too wide). %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compile History: %%
+%% %%
+%% February, 2010: adhere (Andrew D. Hwang) %%
+%% texlive2007, GNU/Linux %%
+%% %%
+%% Command block: %%
+%% %%
+%% pdflatex x3 (Run pdflatex three times) %%
+%% makeindex -r %%
+%% pdflatex %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% February 2010: pglatex. %%
+%% Compile this project with: %%
+%% pdflatex 31428-t.tex ..... THREE times %%
+%% makeindex -r 31428-t.idx %%
+%% pdflatex 31428-t.tex %%
+%% %%
+%% pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) %%
+%% %%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\listfiles
+\documentclass[12pt]{book}[2005/09/16]
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% PACKAGES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}[2006/05/05]
+
+\usepackage{ifthen}[2001/05/26] %% Logical conditionals
+
+\usepackage{amsmath}[2000/07/18] %% Displayed equations
+\usepackage{amssymb}[2002/01/22] %% and additional symbols
+
+\usepackage{alltt}[1997/06/16] %% boilerplate, credits, license
+
+\usepackage{array}[2005/08/23] %% extended array/tabular features
+
+\usepackage[osf]{mathpazo}[2005/04/12]
+
+% Define \textgoth
+\IfFileExists{yfonts.sty}%
+{\usepackage{yfonts}[2003/01/08]} % fraktur font (titlepage only)
+{\providecommand{\textgoth}[1]{\textbf{##1}}} % fallback if no yfonts
+
+\usepackage{perpage}[2006/07/15] %% extended footnote capabilities
+
+\usepackage{multicol}[2006/05/18]
+\usepackage{makeidx}[2000/03/29]
+
+\usepackage[font={sc,scriptsize}]{caption}[2007/01/07]
+\usepackage{graphicx}[1999/02/16]%% For diagrams
+\usepackage{wrapfig}[2003/01/31] %% and wrapping text around them
+
+\usepackage{textcomp}[2005/09/27]
+\usepackage{indentfirst}[1995/11/23]
+\usepackage{textcase}[2004/10/07]
+
+\usepackage{calc}[2005/08/06]
+
+% for running heads
+\usepackage{fancyhdr}
+
+\newcommand{\Titleskip}[1]{#1\TmpLen}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% Interlude: Set up PRINTING (default) or SCREEN VIEWING %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+% ForPrinting=true (default) false
+% Asymmetric margins Symmetric margins
+% Black hyperlinks Blue hyperlinks
+% Start Preface, ToC, etc. recto No blank verso pages
+%
+% Chapter-like ``Sections'' start both recto and verso in the scanned
+% book. This behavior has been retained.
+\newboolean{ForPrinting}
+\newboolean{ShowOriginalFolios}
+
+%% UNCOMMENT the next line for a PRINT-OPTIMIZED VERSION of the text %%
+%\setboolean{ForPrinting}{true}
+
+%% UNCOMMENT the line below to add marginal notes showing original
+%% folio numbers (if ForPrinting=false, only marginal notes in the
+%% right margin are printed)
+%\setboolean{ShowOriginalFolios}{true}
+
+%% Initialize values to ForPrinting=false
+\newcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=1:1} % Symmetric margins
+\newcommand{\HLinkColor}{blue} % Hyperlink color
+\newcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{SinglePage}
+\newcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+\newcommand{\TransNoteCommon}{%
+ Minor typographical corrections and presentational changes have been
+ made without comment. Illustrations may have been moved slightly
+ relative to the surrounding text.
+ \smallskip
+
+ Aside from clear misspellings, every effort has been made to
+ preserve variations of spelling and hyphenation from the original.
+ \bigskip
+}
+
+\newcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for screen viewing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for printing. Please see the preamble of the \LaTeX\
+ source file for instructions.
+}
+%% Re-set if ForPrinting=true
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \renewcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=2:3} % Asymmetric margins
+ \renewcommand{\HLinkColor}{black} % Hyperlink color
+ \renewcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{TwoPageRight}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for printing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for screen viewing. Please see the preamble of the
+ \LaTeX\ source file for instructions.
+ }
+}{% If ForPrinting=false, don't skip to recto
+ \renewcommand{\cleardoublepage}{\clearpage}
+}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% End of PRINTING/SCREEN VIEWING code; back to packages %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in}%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}%
+}{%
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ShowOriginalFolios}}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{5in}%
+ }{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{4.5in}%
+ }%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{7in}%
+}
+
+%\usepackage[body={4.25in,5.67in},\Margins]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+\usepackage[body={4.25in,5.7in},\Margins]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+
+\providecommand{\ebook}{00000} % Overridden during white-washing
+\usepackage[pdftex,
+ hyperfootnotes=false,
+ pdftitle={The Project Gutenberg eBook \#\ebook: Matter, Ether, and Motion},
+ pdfauthor={Amos E. Dolbear},
+ pdfkeywords={Andrew D. Hwang, Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif,
+ Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team},
+ pdfstartview=Fit, % default value
+ pdfstartpage=1, % default value
+ pdfpagemode=UseNone, % default value
+ bookmarks=true, % default value
+ linktocpage=false, % default value
+ pdfpagelayout=\PDFPageLayout,
+ pdfdisplaydoctitle,
+ pdfpagelabels=true,
+ bookmarksopen=true,
+ bookmarksopenlevel=1,
+ colorlinks=true,
+ linkcolor=\HLinkColor]{hyperref}[2007/02/07]
+
+% Re-crop screen-formatted version, accommodating wide displays
+\ifthenelse{\not\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ShowOriginalFolios}}{%
+ \hypersetup{pdfpagescrop= 0 20 545 800}%
+ }{%
+ \hypersetup{pdfpagescrop= 0 20 527 800}%
+ }%
+}%
+
+
+%%%% Fixed-width environment to format PG boilerplate %%%%
+% Size leaves no overfull hbox at 72 char line width
+\newenvironment{PGtext}{%
+\begin{alltt}
+\fontsize{8}{10.5}\ttfamily\selectfont}%
+{\end{alltt}}
+
+%% No hrule in page header
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
+
+%% Adjust line spacing
+\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.1}
+\raggedbottom
+\setlength{\headheight}{15pt}
+
+% Top-level footnote numbers restart on each page
+\MakePerPage{footnote}
+
+\newcommand{\ToCFont}{\normalfont\scshape}
+\newcommand{\Heading}{\normalfont\large}
+
+\makeatletter
+% Dotted lines to chapters in toc
+\renewcommand{\l@chapter}{\@dottedtocline{0}{0em}{3.5em}}
+\renewcommand{\@dotsep}{12}
+% Redefine figure caption
+\renewcommand{\fnum@figure}[1]{}
+\makeatother
+
+% Running heads
+\newcommand{\SetRunningHeads}[2]{%
+ \fancyhead{}
+ \setlength{\headheight}{15pt}
+ % \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \fancyhead[CE]{\normalfont\footnotesize #1}
+ \fancyhead[CO]{\normalfont\footnotesize \MakeUppercase{#2}}
+
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}
+ {\fancyhead[RO,LE]{\thepage}}
+ {\fancyhead[R]{\thepage}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\ToCBox}[1]{%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{\protect\scshape#1}
+}
+
+% ToC line for generic chapter; \TmpLen set by \Chapter
+\newcommand{\SetContentsLine}[2]{%
+ \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{%
+ \protect\texorpdfstring{%
+ \protect\ToCBox{#1.} \protect\scshape #2}{#1. #2}%
+ }
+}
+
+%\Chapter[PDF name]{Number}{Heading title}{Folio number}
+\newcommand{\Chapter}[4][]{%
+ \clearpage
+ \phantomsection
+ \null% [** PP: Add some vertical space above the heading]
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#2}{I}}{%
+ \thispagestyle{plain}%
+ \section*{\centering\normalfont\Large MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION\break
+ \tb[1.5in]\break
+ \Heading CHAPTER #2\rule[-16pt]{0pt}{16pt}\break%
+ {\normalsize\bfseries #3}}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{%
+ \protect\vspace*{-24pt}%
+ \protect\scriptsize\protect\noindent CHAPTER\protect\hfill PAGE}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{}%
+ \addtocontents{toc}{%
+ \protect\footnotesize%
+ \protect\settowidth{\protect\TmpLen}{\protect\ToCFont XIII.}}
+ }{%
+ \section*{\centering\Heading%
+ CHAPTER #2\rule[-16pt]{0pt}{16pt}\break%
+ {\normalsize\bfseries #3}}
+ }
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{% Need to pass alt. title to texorpdfstring?
+ \SetContentsLine{#2}{#3}%
+ \SetRunningHeads{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}{#3}
+ }{%
+ \SetContentsLine{#2}{#1}%
+ \SetRunningHeads{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}{#1}
+ }%
+
+ \DPPageSep{}{#4}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Section}[1]
+ {\subsection*{\normalfont\small\centering #1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Subsection}[1]
+ {\subsection*{\normalfont\normalsize\itshape\centering #1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Preface}[1]{%
+ \clearpage
+ \fancyhf{}
+ \cleardoublepage
+ \phantomsection
+ \null %[** PP: Add some vertical space above the heading]
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \section*{\centering\normalfont\normalsize #1\break\tb[0.5in]}
+
+ \SetRunningHeads{#1}{#1}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Appendix}{%
+ \clearpage
+ \phantomsection
+ \null %[** PP: Add some vertical space above the heading]
+ \section*{\centering\normalfont\normalsize APPENDIX\break\tb[0.5in]}
+
+ \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{\texorpdfstring{\protect\ToCBox{} Appendix}{Appendix}}
+ \SetRunningHeads{APPENDIX}{APPENDIX}
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\AppendixRef}[1]{%
+ \hfill\nobreak\null\nopagebreak[4]%
+ \break\null\hfill{\scriptsize#1}\hspace*{1em}\medskip%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\AppendixCite}[2]{%
+ \AppendixRef{\textsc{#1} \textit{#2}}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\AppendixCitePage}[3]{%
+ \AppendixRef{\textsc{#1} \textit{#2} #3}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Note}[1]
+ {\subsection*{\normalfont\footnotesize\centering\scshape#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Cite}[2]{\break\null\hfill\textsc{#1} \textit{#2}\quad\par\medskip}
+
+
+\DeclareMathSizes{12}{11}{9}{8}
+
+\newcommand{\First}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
+
+% For corrections.
+\newcommand{\DPtypo}[2]{#2}
+\newcommand{\DPnote}[1]{}
+
+% \PadTo[#1]{#2}{#3} sets #3 in a box of width #2, aligned at #1 (default [c])
+% Examples: \PadTo{feet per sec.}{\Ditto}, \PadTo{The value is}{2.}
+\newlength{\TmpLen}
+\newcommand{\PadTo}[3][c]{%
+ \settowidth{\TmpLen}{$#2$}%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][#1]{$#3$}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Ditto}{\raisebox{1ex}{\textquotestraightdblbase}}
+\newcommand{\tb}[1][0.75in]{\rule{#1}{0.5pt}}
+\newcommand{\TBskip}{\bigskip}
+\newcommand{\TableFont}{\footnotesize}
+\newcommand{\Z}{\phantom{0}}
+
+\newcommand{\stretchyspace}{\spaceskip0.5em plus 0.5em minus 0.3em}
+
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00A3}{\pounds}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00B0}{{}^\circ}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00B1}{\pm}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00B7}{\cdot}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00D7}{\times}
+\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{00F7}{\div}
+
+% ToC formatting
+\AtBeginDocument{%
+ \renewcommand{\contentsname}{%
+ \thispagestyle{empty}%
+ \centering\normalfont\large CONTENTS\\\tb%
+ }
+ \renewcommand{\figurename}{}
+}
+
+% Cross-referencing: anchors
+\newcommand{\Pagelabel}[1]
+ {\phantomsection\label{page:#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Figlabel}[1]
+ {\phantomsection\label{fig:#1}}
+
+% and links
+\newcommand{\Pageref}[2]{%
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}%
+ {\hyperref[page:#2]{\pageref{page:#2}}}
+ {\hyperref[page:#2]{#1~\pageref{page:#2}}}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Chapref}[2]{\hyperref[chapter:#2]{#1~#2}}
+
+%%%% Page numbers of original %%%%
+\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.375in}
+\setlength{\marginparsep}{8pt}
+\newcommand{\DPPageSep}[2]{%
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ShowOriginalFolios}}{%
+ \ifthenelse{\not\equal{#2}{unnumbered}}{%
+ \marginpar[\flushright\scriptsize p.~#2]{\scriptsize p.~#2}%
+ }{}%
+ }{}%
+}
+
+%%%% Illustrations and decorations %%%%
+\newcommand{\Graphic}[2]{\includegraphics[width=#1]{./images/#2.png}}
+\captionsetup{justification=centering,%
+ aboveskip=-6pt,%
+ labelformat=empty}
+
+\newcommand{\Caption}[2]{\Figlabel{#1}\caption{#2}}
+
+\newcommand{\BLS}{1}
+\newenvironment{Quote}{%
+ \medskip\par\small\linespread{0.875}\selectfont%
+ \spaceskip0.5em plus 0.5em minus 0.25em%
+}{%
+ \medskip\par\linespread{\BLS}\normalsize%
+ \stretchyspace%
+}
+
+% Macros for the catalogue (final two pages)
+\newlength{\QUAD}
+\setlength{\QUAD}{1em}
+
+\newcommand{\Entry}[1]
+ {\bigskip\par\noindent\hangindent3\QUAD\textbf{\small #1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Subentry}{\par\medskip\noindent\hspace*{\QUAD}\hangindent2\QUAD\footnotesize}
+
+\newenvironment{Descrip}{%
+ \medskip\par\linespread{1}%
+ \scriptsize%
+}{\par%
+ \linespread{\BLS}\normalsize%
+}
+
+% Author, Title, and Price
+\newcommand{\Au}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% INDEX %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\makeatletter
+\renewcommand{\@idxitem}{\par\hangindent 24\p@\global\let\idxbrk\nobreak}
+\renewcommand{\subitem}{\idxbrk\@idxitem \hspace*{12\p@}\let\idxbrk\relax}
+\renewcommand{\indexspace}{\par\penalty-3000 \vskip 10pt plus5pt minus3pt\relax}
+
+\renewenvironment{theindex}{%
+ \setlength\columnseprule{0.5pt}%
+ \setlength\columnsep{12pt}%
+ \begin{multicols}{2}[\begin{center}\Large INDEX\\\tb\end{center}]%
+ \footnotesize%
+ \setlength\parindent{0pt}%
+ \setlength\parskip{0pt plus 0.3pt}%
+ \thispagestyle{plain}%
+ \let\item\@idxitem\raggedright }
+ {\end{multicols}\clearpage\normalsize\fancyhead{}\cleardoublepage}
+\makeatother
+\newcommand\IndexBookmark{%
+ \phantomsection%
+ \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{\texorpdfstring{\protect\ToCBox{} Index}{Index}}
+ \SetRunningHeads{INDEX}{INDEX}
+}
+
+% Miscellaneous extra formatting for individual entries
+\newcommand{\etseq}[1]{\hyperpage{#1} \protect\textit{et~seq.}}
+\renewcommand{\see}[2]{\textit{See} #1}
+
+\makeindex
+
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\pagestyle{empty}
+\pagenumbering{Alph}
+
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Front Matter}{Front Matter}
+
+%%%% PG BOILERPLATE %%%%
+\Pagelabel{PGBoilerplate}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG Boilerplate}{Project Gutenberg Boilerplate}
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\small
+\begin{PGtext}
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl., by
+Amos Emerson Dolbear
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl.
+ The Factors and Relations of Physical Science
+
+Author: Amos Emerson Dolbear
+
+Release Date: February 27, 2010 [EBook #31428]
+Most recently updated: June 11, 2021
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION ***
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+
+\clearpage
+
+
+%%%% Credits and transcriber's note %%%%
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\begin{PGtext}
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+
+\begin{minipage}{0.85\textwidth}
+\small
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Transcriber's Note}{Transcriber's Note}
+\subsection*{\centering\normalfont\scshape%
+\normalsize\MakeLowercase{\TransNote}}%
+
+\raggedright
+\TransNoteText
+\end{minipage}
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FRONT MATTER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\DPPageSep{001.png}{unnumbered}%
+\clearpage
+\null
+\vfill
+\begin{center}
+\setlength{\fboxsep}{12pt}
+\framebox{%
+\begin{minipage}{3in}%[** Hard-coded width]
+\begin{center}
+\textgoth{By Professor A.~E. Dolbear} \\
+\tb[0.5in]
+\end{center}
+
+\textit{\footnotesize MATTER, ETHER AND MOTION}
+\smallskip
+
+\hspace*{\QUAD}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth-2\QUAD}
+\scriptsize
+The Factors and Relations of Physical Science \\
+Enlarged Edition\quad Cloth\quad Illustrated\quad \$2.00
+\end{minipage}
+
+\medskip
+\textit{\footnotesize THE TELEPHONE}
+\smallskip
+
+\hspace*{\QUAD}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth-2\QUAD}
+\scriptsize
+With directions for making a Speaking Telephone \\
+Illustrated\quad 50~cents
+\end{minipage}
+
+\medskip
+\textit{\footnotesize THE ART OF PROJECTING}
+\smallskip
+
+\hspace*{\QUAD}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth-2\QUAD}
+\scriptsize
+A Manual of Experimentation in Physics, Chemistry,
+and Natural History, with the Porte Lumière
+and Magic Lantern \\
+New Edition\quad Revised\quad Illustrated\quad \$2.00
+\end{minipage}
+
+\begin{center}
+\tb[0.5in]\\
+\textgoth{\footnotesize Lee and Shepard Publishers Boston}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+
+\DPPageSep{002.png}{unnumbered}% i
+% title page
+\frontmatter
+\pagestyle{empty}
+
+\setlength{\TmpLen}{0.125in}%
+
+\begin{center}
+{\LARGE \scshape Matter, Ether, and Motion} \\[\Titleskip{4}]
+{\itshape THE FACTORS AND RELATIONS \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+OF\\[\Titleskip{1}]
+PHYSICAL SCIENCE}\\[\Titleskip{4}]
+{\scriptsize\upshape BY} \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+{\scshape A.~E. DOLBEAR Ph.D.}
+\medskip
+
+\tiny\upshape PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS TUFTS COLLEGE \\
+AUTHOR OF ``THE TELEPHONE'' ``THE ART OF PROJECTING'' ETC.
+
+\vspace*{4\TmpLen}
+{\scriptsize\itshape REVISED EDITION, ENLARGED}
+\vspace*{4\TmpLen}
+
+\small B\,O\,S\,T\,O\,N %[** PP: One-off gesperrt]
+
+LEE\quad AND\quad SHEPARD\quad PUBLISHERS
+\smallskip
+
+\scriptsize 10 MILK STREET
+
+\small 1894
+\end{center}
+
+\DPPageSep{003.png}{unnumbered}% ii
+% copyright page
+\clearpage
+\begin{center}
+\scriptsize
+\null\vfill
+\scshape Copyright, 1892, 1894, by Lee and Shepard \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+\itshape All Rights Reserved \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+\scshape Matter, Ether, and Motion
+\vfill
+C.~J. Peters \& Son, \\
+Type-Setters and Electrotypers, \\
+145 High Street, Boston.
+\end{center}
+
+\clearpage
+\pagestyle{fancy}
+\fancyfoot{}
+
+\stretchyspace
+
+\Preface{PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION}
+\DPPageSep{004.png}{iii}%
+
+\First{The} issue of a new edition of this book gives me an
+opportunity to make some needed corrections, and enlarge
+it by the addition of three new chapters, which
+I hope will make it more useful to such as have a taste
+for fundamental physical problems. The first of these,
+Properties of Matter as Modes of Motion, presents
+the evidence that all the characteristic properties of
+matter are due to energy embodied in various forms
+of motion. The second, on The Implications of
+Physical Phenomena, points out what assumptions
+are made in explaining phenomena. It is the substance
+of a series of articles published in the \textit{Psychical
+Review} in 1892 and~1893. The third, on The Relations
+between Physical and Psychical Phenomena,
+was read as a paper before the Psychical Congress at
+the World's Fair in August,~1893.
+
+Judging from some of the comments made about my
+statements as to Modern Geometry on \Pageref{page}{57}, and
+as to Vital Force, \Pageref{p.}{279}, I have thought it would be
+useful to some to see corroboratory statements; and I
+have therefore added, in an appendix, a few pages of
+\DPPageSep{005.png}{iv}%
+quotations from some of the most eminent mathematicians
+and biologists on these subjects, and from them
+one may judge whether or not my statements are
+correct.
+
+As the work is a treatise on Physics, there is no
+special reason for going beyond it; but if this presentation
+of the subject is any approach to the truth, there
+is an important conclusion to be drawn from it. If the
+ether be the homogeneous and uniform medium it is
+believed with reason to be, then, in the absence of
+what we call matter, no physical change which we call
+a phenomenon could possibly arise in it; for every such
+phenomenon is a product, and in the absence of one of
+the essential factors, viz., matter, it could not be. If
+matter itself be a form of motion of the ether, the ether
+must have existed prior to matter; also, if the atom be a
+form of energy, then must energy have existed before
+matter existed. Hence there must have been some
+other agency radically different from any physical
+energy we know, and independent of everything we
+know, which was capable of producing orderly physical
+phenomena, by acting upon the ether; for a homogeneous
+medium could not originate it. Some philosophers
+call this antecedent power The Unknowable; others call
+it God. If energy \emph{as we know it} implies antecedent
+energy as we do not know it, so, likewise, mind as we
+know it implies antecedent mind under totally different
+conditions from those in which we find it embodied.
+
+In whatever direction one pursues physical science,
+\DPPageSep{006.png}{v}%
+he is at last confronted with a physical phenomenon
+with a superphysical antecedent where all physical
+methods of investigation are impotent. Such considerations
+raise the theistic hypothesis of creation to the
+rank of such physical theories as the nebula theory
+of the origin of the solar system, and the undulatory
+theory of light.
+\DPPageSep{007.png}{unnumbered}% vi
+% [Blank Page]
+
+
+\Preface{PREFACE}
+\DPPageSep{008.png}{vii}%
+
+\First{Within} the past fifty years the advance in physical
+knowledge has not only been rapid, but it has been
+well-nigh revolutionary. Not that knowledge that was
+felt to be well grounded before has been set aside,---for
+it has not been,---but the fundamental principles
+of natural philosophy that were applied by Sir Isaac
+Newton and others to masses of visible magnitude
+have been applied to molecules; and it has thus been
+discovered that all kinds of phenomena are subject to
+the same mechanical laws. It was thought before that
+physics embraced several distinct provinces of knowledge
+which were not necessarily related to each other,
+such as mechanics, heat, electricity, etc. Such terms
+as imponderable matter, latent heat, electric fluid,
+forces of nature, and others in common use in text-books
+and elsewhere, served to maintain the distinctions;
+and even to-day some of these obsolete physical
+agencies are to be met in books and places where one
+would hope not to find them. As all physical phenomena
+are reducible to the principles of mechanics, atoms
+and molecules are subject to them as much as masses
+\DPPageSep{009.png}{viii}%
+of visible magnitude; and it has become apparent that
+however different one phenomenon is from another, the
+factors of both are the same,---matter, ether, and
+motion; so that all the so-called forces of nature,
+considered as objective things controlling phenomena,
+are seen to have no existence; that all phenomena are
+reducible to nothing more mysterious than a push or
+a pull.
+
+Some say that science is simply classified knowledge.
+To the author it is more than that, it is a consistent
+body of knowledge; and a true explanation of any
+phenomenon cannot be inconsistent with the best
+established body of knowledge we have. If physical
+factors are fundamental, then theorizers must square
+their theories to them.
+
+The text-books have not kept pace with the advance
+of knowledge; and there is a large body of persons
+desirous of knowing more of natural philosophy, and
+especially of its trend, who have neither time nor
+opportunity to read and digest monographs on a thousand
+topics. To meet the wants of such, this book has
+been written. It undertakes to present in a systematic
+way the mechanical principles that underlie the phenomena
+in each of the different departments of the
+science, in a readable form, and in an untechnical
+manner. The aim has been to simplify and reduce
+to mechanical conceptions wherever it was possible
+to do so.
+
+One may often hear the question asked, What is
+\DPPageSep{010.png}{ix}%
+electricity? but a similar question as to the nature of
+heat or light or chemism is just as pertinent, although
+there chances now to be less popular interest in these
+than in the former; not, however, because they are in
+themselves better understood, or less interesting.
+
+It is hoped that some of those whose interests lie
+along such special lines as chemistry, electricity, and
+even biology, will find something helpful in the chapters
+dealing with those subjects.
+
+In covering so much ground in so small a treatise, it
+was necessary to select such facts as give prominence
+to fundamental principles. Doubtless others might
+have selected different materials, even with the same
+end in view, for otherwise competent persons are
+generally more familiar with certain details of a given
+science than with others; and I have used what was
+closest at hand.
+
+Aside from the topics usually treated upon in a book
+of physics, the reader will find a chapter on Physical
+Fields, which is unique, as it extends the principle of
+sympathetic action---recognized in acoustics---to the
+whole range of phenomena, including living things.
+
+The chapter on Life, in a treatise on physics, must
+justify itself; while the one on Machines points out
+their functions in a more complete way than has been
+done before.
+
+Lastly, however large the physical universe may be,
+and however exact such relations as we have established
+may be, it is daily becoming more certain that
+\DPPageSep{011.png}{x}%
+even in the physical universe we have to do with a
+factor,---the ether,---the properties of which we vainly
+strive to interpret in terms of matter, the undiscovered
+properties of which ought to warn every one against
+the danger of strongly asserting what is possible and
+what impossible in the nature of things. With the
+electro-magnetic theory of light now just established,
+and the vortex ring theory of matter still \textit{sub~judice},
+but with daily increasing evidence in its favor, one may
+now be sure that matter itself is more wonderful than
+any philosopher ever thought. Its possibilities may
+have been vastly underrated.
+
+In the book called ``The Unseen Universe,'' it is
+pointed out that possibly the ether may be the medium
+through which mind and matter re-act. What fifteen
+years ago was deemed \emph{possible}, is to-day deemed \emph{probable},
+and to-morrow may be demonstrated; and a perusal
+of that book is recommended to persons who are
+interested in questions of that kind.
+\DPPageSep{012.png}{unnumbered}%
+% table of contents
+
+\pagestyle{empty}
+\tableofcontents
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Contents}{Contents}%
+
+
+\iffalse
+
+CONTENTS
+
+CHAPTER PAGE
+
+I. MATTER AND ITS PROPERTIES 1
+
+II. THE ETHER 26
+
+III. MOTION 44
+
+IV. ENERGY 59
+
+V. GRAVITATION 83
+
+VI. HEAT 99
+
+VII. ETHER WAVES 134
+
+VIII. ELECTRICITY 173
+
+IX. CHEMISM 238
+
+X. SOUND 256
+
+XI. LIFE 277
+
+XII. PHYSICAL FIELDS 298
+
+XIII. ON MACHINES.--MECHANISM 312
+
+XIV. PROPERTIES OF MATTER AS MODES OF MOTION 331
+
+XV. IMPLICATIONS OF PHYSICAL PHENOMENA 354
+
+XVI. RELATIONS OF PHYSICAL AND PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA 384
+
+APPENDIX 397
+
+INDEX 403
+
+\fi
+
+%\DPPageSep{013.png}{1}%
+
+\mainmatter
+\pagestyle{fancy}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Main Matter}{Main Matter}
+
+% MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION
+
+
+\Chapter{I}{Matter and Its Properties}{1}
+
+\First{All} kinds of phenomena that we can become conscious
+of through any of our senses are traceable
+directly or indirectly to what we call matter. The
+sense of feeling implies contact with a body of some
+kind; the sense of hearing depends upon movements
+of the air, which is a body of matter having certain
+properties; and the sense of sight, also due to vibratory
+motion, implies that matter exists, however distant,
+which has given rise to the vibratory motions that are
+perceived as light. So of taste and smell, actual contact
+of material particles endowed with particular
+properties are the conditions for exciting these sense
+perceptions. Some philosophers have added a sixth
+sense to the five senses we have recognized for so long
+a time---the sense of weight, as distinguished from the
+sense of touch; and still others have thought to distinguish
+a sense of temperature---relative perceptions of
+heat and cold, from the sense of touch; and if these
+truly represent distinct senses, they illustrate still
+further the truth that it is through the reactions of
+\DPPageSep{014.png}{2}%
+matter upon the nervous organizations of living things
+that all of our knowledge of things about us and of
+the universe as a whole is obtained.
+
+It might seem to one as if our knowledge of matter
+should be tolerably good, accurate, and complete, seeing
+that it is thrust upon us everywhere, and affects us
+for good or evil continuously from the dawn of sensation
+till death; yet it may truly be said that the knowledge
+of matter, its properties, and the wonderful complexity
+of phenomena that are due to them, which we
+possess to-day was wholly unknown to all mankind
+until the time of Sir~Isaac Newton, whose discovery
+of the law of gravitation was the first discovery of
+a universal property of matter; and by far the larger
+part of the knowledge we have, has been acquired in
+this century and mostly within the last half of it. The
+mass of mankind is, as it always has been, without
+any knowledge at all and without any desire for it.
+Whatever we have is due to the work of a small number
+of persons in Western Europe and America. Probably
+the large majority of mankind are quite unable
+to understand phenomena and their significance, yet
+among the brighter and more competent individuals in
+every country there is an apathy and indifference to the
+subject, due, of course, to the estimate they have of its
+degree of importance; and this estimate is in a good
+measure due to the philosophy of things in general
+held by the individual thinkers.
+
+When Mr.\ Emerson was told by a Millenarian that
+the world was coming to an end the next day, he
+declared that he could get along without it, and so it
+\DPPageSep{015.png}{3}%
+probably has seemed to the majority of philosophers
+that the material world was a condition of things to be
+endured, rather than to be understood and utilized:
+that they were in it but were not a part of it.
+
+Knowledge has, however, increased, and the wise
+ones are growing wiser; and some of the modern questions
+of philosophy and psychology are now so woven
+in with physical details that a knowledge of matter and
+its possibilities has become to them imperative.
+
+There have been many attempts to define matter,
+such as, whatever occupies space, or whatever affects
+our senses, and so on; and there is no brief definition
+that has been generally adopted. In the ordinary
+affairs of life one rarely needs to make such distinctions
+as are necessary in philosophical and scientific affairs,
+where accuracy and clearness are of the utmost importance.
+There seems to be no way to define matter
+except by means of some of its properties. If we say
+that it is whatever occupies space, there is implied in
+the statement that the term is properly applicable to
+everything that exists in space; but so far as we know
+there may be any number of things in illimitable space
+that are not subject to any of the physical laws, such as
+a piece of wood or an air particle are known to be controlled
+by. If we say whatever affects our senses, we
+again are going beyond our warrant; for electricity is
+capable of affecting several of our senses,---sight, taste,
+feeling,---and yet there is no good reason for thinking
+electricity to be matter.
+
+There is one property of matter that may seem to
+differentiate it from everything else, and hence, if
+\DPPageSep{016.png}{4}%
+\index{Matter, characteristic property}%
+\index{Matter, its definition}%
+adopted, will enable one to be precise about his use of
+the term. One part of the law of universal gravitation
+is---\emph{every particle of matter in the universe attracts every
+other particle}. This makes gravitation a universal property
+of matter. The astronomers have observed the
+movements of exceedingly distant stars to be in accordance
+with this law, and there are no exceptions to it
+that have been discovered.
+
+If, then, one adopts as the definition of matter, \emph{whatever
+possesses the property of gravitative attraction}, he
+will have a definition that is in accordance with everything
+we know, and with the added advantage that if
+there be anything else in the universe that involves
+observable phenomena he will not need to confuse it
+with the phenomena of gravitative matter. This is the
+sense in which that term is used throughout this book.
+\TBskip
+
+Matter presents itself to our senses in a scale of
+magnitude from particles in the neighborhood of the
+hundred-thousandth part of an inch in diameter, and
+requiring the highest powers of the microscope to see,
+to such huge masses as that of the earth, eight thousand
+miles in diameter, the planet Jupiter, nearly eighty
+thousand miles, and the sun, eight hundred thousand
+miles in diameter, while some of the more distant stars
+are probably ten times larger than the sun. The large
+masses, however, are but collections of smaller ones,
+each particle bringing its own properties of whatever
+kinds they may be; and it does not appear that new
+qualities are developed by simply changing the distance
+between bodies. So the properties of matter may be
+\DPPageSep{017.png}{5}%
+studied exhaustively without employing specimens
+inconveniently large.
+
+The thin stratum of gold spread upon cheap jewelry
+has all the characteristics and qualities of any specimen
+of gold however large; and a small test tube of
+hydrogen will exhibit all the kinds of phenomena that
+any larger quantity would show. For such reasons the
+study of the universe of matter can be carried on in
+the laboratory. The universe may be in the crucible
+one holds in the tongs; whatever difference there may
+seem to be, it will really be one of bigness only.
+
+In treatises on physics one will generally find the
+properties of matter arranged in two divisions, called
+essential properties and non-essential ones. Of the
+former are (1)~extension, or space occupying; (2)~inertia,
+or passiveness under conditions of rest or motion;
+(3)~impenetrability, or total and exclusive occupancy of
+its own space; (4)~elasticity, or ability to recover its
+form after distortion, this, however, varying in degree
+in different bodies; (5)~attraction, of which there are
+several varieties,---gravitation, acting at all distances;
+chemism, acting at close distances and selective in its
+operation, and apparently not existing at all between
+some kinds of matter, as, for instance, between oxygen
+and fluorine. Chemism is also capable of complete
+neutralization, and is thus in marked contrast with
+gravitative attraction, which is not affected in the slightest
+degree discoverable by contiguity; and lastly, cohesion,
+which is not apparent except bodies are in contact,
+but is the agency that holds the particles of bodies together
+so they form liquids and solids of any and all sorts.
+\DPPageSep{018.png}{6}%
+
+The so-called non-essential properties are color, hardness,
+malleability, ductility, and the like, which vary very
+much in different substances. Among the metals silver
+is white, copper is red, gold is yellow. Diamond is the
+hardest substance known, while graphite is one of the
+softest, though both are composed of the same ultimate
+substance---carbon. Iron is malleable, and may be
+forged into any shape. Gold may be hammered out into
+leaves no more than one three-hundred-thousandth of
+an inch thick, but zinc is wholly unmanageable in that
+way. Platinum, one of the heaviest metals we have,
+can be drawn out into a wire finer than a spider's web,---a
+single grain may be drawn into a mile of wire; while
+bismuth, also a metal, cannot be drawn at all.
+
+There are other conditions of matter that offer
+opportunities for convenient grouping sometimes, such
+as the solid, the liquid, and the gaseous: the solid
+being the one where the parts strongly cohere; the
+liquid, where the parts have but slight cohesion; and
+the gaseous, where the individual particles do not
+cohere at all, but, being elastic, bump against each
+other and rebound continually.
+
+Farther on it will be shown how all substances may
+assume either of these conditions, inasmuch as it is
+temperature that determines whether a given substance
+be a solid, a liquid, or a gas.
+
+Density signifies compactness of matter, or the relative
+\index{Density}%
+number of particles in a given unit volume. If compression
+be applied to two cubic feet of common air until
+it occupies but one cubic foot, there is twice as much
+matter in that cubic foot as there was at the outset, and
+\DPPageSep{019.png}{7}%
+we express that fact by saying that the density is
+doubled. If twice the amount of matter is in the unit
+space, evidently the weight of the matter in that space
+must be twice what it was at first. So one may measure
+the density of matter by the weight of a unit
+volume of it compared with the weight of the same
+volume of some other substance taken as unity. Thus,
+if a cubic foot of water weighs $62.5$~pounds, and a cubic
+foot of rock weighs $155$~pounds, the density of the rock
+is~$2\frac{1}{2}$, which means that it is $2\frac{1}{2}$~times heavier than
+water, and that the amount of matter in the rock
+is $2\frac{1}{2}$~times greater than that of the water. Such
+determinations have been made of all the different
+materials that could be found, and extensive tables
+have thus been constructed; but it is seen that the
+appeal is to gravitation, and presumes that every particle
+obeys that law, and that degrees of compactness of
+matter do not affect the law. Such comparative tables,
+based upon gravitation measure, are frequently called
+tables of \emph{Specific Gravity}, so that density and specific
+\index{Gravity, specific}%
+\index{Specific gravity}%
+gravity mean substantially the same thing. The following
+examples of the relative densities of bodies may be
+of interest:---
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular} {ll<{\qquad} ll<{\qquad} ll}
+Gold, & $19$ & Diamond, & $4$ & Alcohol, & $\Z.8$ \\
+Silver, & $10.5$ & Common Stone, & $2.5$ & Ether, & $1.1$ \\
+Copper, & $8.8$ & Wood, & $\Z.8$ & Water, & $1$ \\
+Iron, & $7.8$ & Sulphuric Acid, & $1.8$ & The Earth, & $5.6$
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+Such numbers are to be understood as signifying that
+if a given volume of water weighs one pound, an equal
+volume of gold weighs nineteen pounds, an equal volume
+of iron seven and eight-tenths pounds, and so on.
+\DPPageSep{020.png}{8}%
+
+Sometimes, however, it is convenient to choose for a
+standard of density some body, a small unit volume of
+which is much lighter than water, such as air, or more
+frequently hydrogen gas, a hundred cubic inches of which
+weigh $2.2$~grains. In the metric system, a litre, which
+is nearly two pints is the standard of volume; and a
+litre of hydrogen weighs $.0896$~of a gram.
+
+In chemical work this is the common standard for
+gases; while for solids and liquids a cubic centimetre of
+water is taken, which weighs one gram.
+
+\Section{DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER.}
+\index{Matter, divisibility of}%
+
+Particles of matter as small as the hundred-thousandth
+of an inch may be seen with a good microscope
+as the smallest visible thing, but there is no reason for
+thinking that such a degree of fineness is any approach
+to the ultimate fineness of the parts into which it is
+possible to divide matter. For a long time philosophers
+have considered whether or not there could, in
+the nature of things, be an actual limit to the divisibility
+of matter, so that the smallest fragment could
+not be again divided into two or more parts by the
+application of appropriate means, thus making matter
+infinitely divisible, at any rate ideally.
+
+In Mr.\ Spencer's ``First Principles'' this subject is
+considered at length, and the conclusion reached that it
+is impossible to conceive the existence of real atoms---bodies
+that cannot be divided into halves; nevertheless,
+we shall see presently that it is possible to
+conceive precisely that thing. It will be best here to
+\DPPageSep{021.png}{9}%
+note how far division has been carried and the means
+employed to effect it.
+
+If a bit of phosphorus be put into a solution of gold,
+the gold will be set free in such a finely divided state
+that the particles remain suspended in the solution,
+giving to it a blue, green, or ruby color, depending
+upon the degree of fineness into which it has been
+broken up. Faraday estimated that the particles of
+gold in the ruby-colored liquid did not exceed the five-hundred
+thousandth part of the volume of the liquid.
+One-eighth of a grain of indigo dissolved in sulphuric
+acid will give a distinctly blue color to two and a half
+gallons of water, which would be about the millionth
+part of a grain to a drop of the water.
+
+A grain of musk will keep a room scented for many
+years. During the whole of the time it must be slowly
+evaporating, giving out its particles to the currents of
+air to be wafted presently out of doors; yet in all this
+time the musk seems to lose but little in weight.
+
+The acute sense of smell of the dog is well known;
+for he can detect the track of his master long after the
+tracks have been made, which shows that some slight
+characteristic matter is left at each footfall.
+
+A spider's web is sometimes so delicate that an
+ounce of it would reach three thousand miles, or from
+New York to London. No one would think it likely
+that such a web would be made up of a single row of
+atoms, like a string of beads; for it would not seem
+probable that such a string could have such a degree
+of cohesion as spiders' webs are known to possess.
+
+Chemists have concluded from their experience with
+\DPPageSep{022.png}{10}%
+matter in its various forms and conditions that it is
+really reducible to ultimate particles which have never
+broken up, no matter what conditions they have been
+subject to; and these ultimate particles are called \emph{atoms}.
+\index{Atoms}%
+The term is not now understood to signify what is
+implied in its derivation, as something that cannot be
+divided, only something that has not yet been broken
+up into smaller parts. Thus hydrogen, oxygen, iron,
+silver, are reducible to such ultimate atoms; and there
+are now known about seventy different kinds of
+atoms, and these are often spoken of as the elements.
+Though they are excessively minute when compared
+with ordinary objects of sight, yet they have a real
+magnitude which the physicist has measured in several
+different ways. Most of these methods are complicated,
+and, in order to be understood, require a pretty
+thorough knowledge of molecular physics; but the following
+one may probably serve to give one an idea of
+the degree of smallness which atoms must have.
+
+When a soap-bubble is blown, the material of the
+\index{Soap-bubbles}%
+film slides down the sides, making the bubble thinnest
+on top. When a certain degree of thinness has been
+reached at the top, colors begin to appear in concentric
+rings, and these colors appear to move towards the
+equatorial regions, new rings being formed at the top
+as fast as room is made for them by the displacement
+of the earlier ones. These colors always appear in the
+same order as they are in the rainbow, namely, beginning
+with the red and ending with the violet, then
+another set with the same order, until there have been
+ten or more such sets of rainbow tints. They are
+\DPPageSep{023.png}{11}%
+explained as being due to what is called interference
+in the light waves that fall upon the film. Light is
+reflected more or less from every surface it reaches.
+Some light is reflected from the first or outer surface
+of the film; some goes through the film to the inner
+surface, and is there reflected back to the outer surface,
+and then takes the direction that the light has which
+is reflected from the first surface, so that the light that
+reaches the eye from a point on a bubble comes from
+both outer and inner surfaces. That coming from the
+inner surface has had to travel farther than that coming
+from the outer surface by a distance of twice the
+thickness of the film. As light consists of waves, if
+one set of waves all of a length be made to move in the
+same direction as another set having the same length,
+their crests may coincide and produce a single higher
+wave; or the crest of one may be behind the crest of
+the other at any distance up to one-half the length of
+the wave itself, in which case the crest of one will
+coincide with the trough of the other, and the two
+waves will cancel each other, and this process is called
+interference. Now, in the case of the bubble, when the
+thickness is such that the distance through the film
+and back again is such as to equal half a wave length
+of a given kind of light, that particular wave is extinguished;
+and when one of the constituents of white
+light is wanting, that which is left is seen as colored
+light, and the color seen must depend upon the kind
+of color that has been cancelled. Red light has the
+longest wave length, about one forty-thousandth of an
+inch, and violet, the shortest of the waves we see, about
+\DPPageSep{024.png}{12}%
+one sixty-thousandth of an inch; and when these colors
+are seen upon the bubble we are assured that the
+interferences are produced by thicknesses due to fractional
+parts of such wave lengths. As the ray must go
+through the thickness twice in order to fall behind one-half
+of a wave, it follows that the thickness of the film
+where the last set of colors appear can be no more than
+one-fourth of the wave length of the shortest wave we
+can see, that is,
+\[
+\frac{1}{4} × \frac{1}{60,000} = \frac{1}{240,000} \text{ of an inch.}
+\]
+When a bubble has reached this degree of thinness, so
+that no more colors are to be seen, a rather remarkable
+physical effect may be noticed. The film becomes
+almost jet black, with a jagged edge well defined
+between it and the brighter colored rings where the
+adjacent tint is purplish. The thickness of the film
+has fallen suddenly off here to about one-fortieth of
+the thickness it has where the tint is visible, and the
+bubble breaks in a second or two after this black patch
+appears; that is, when its thinness at any point becomes
+as small as
+\[
+\frac{1}{240,000} × \frac{1}{40} = \frac{1}{9,600000} \text{ of an inch.}
+\]
+As the bubble, however, does persist for a short time,
+and the thin film has cohesion enough to enable it to
+support the weight of the bubble, it seems highly probable,
+but is not absolutely certain, that it must be more
+than one molecule of water thick at the thinnest
+place, which is, as shown, only about the one ten-millionth
+\DPPageSep{025.png}{13}%
+\index{Molecules, size of}%
+of an inch thick. If one thinks it probable that
+it be, say five molecules thick in order to have the
+degree of cohesion it shows, then the size of such\DPnote{** [sic]}
+molecule of water out of which the bubble is made
+can be but the one-fifth of the above small fraction,
+which gives about the one fifty-millionth part of an
+inch as the diameter of a molecule of water.
+
+But a molecule is not the same thing as an atom: it
+is made up of atoms, chemically combined, and is
+defined generally as being the smallest fragment of a
+compound body that can exist and possess the physical
+characteristics that belong to such body. Thus, a drop
+of water possesses all the characteristics of any larger
+quantity of it, and a drop may be divided into smaller
+and smaller globules, perhaps a million of them, each
+one being visible with a good microscope; but if the
+division be carried to a higher degree, as it can be by
+various methods, chemical, electrical, and thermal, the
+qualities of water disappear, and two different substances,
+oxygen and hydrogen, are left, both gaseous
+under all ordinary conditions, and neither of them exhibiting
+any properties like water or from which any
+of the properties of water might be inferred. It may
+be well to remark here that this is only one illustration
+out of multitudes that might be named throughout the
+whole domain of physical science, that the properties
+of things under common observation are not simply
+the properties that belong to the elements out of
+which the things are built up; such properties
+being the result of collocation rather than inherent
+qualities.
+\DPPageSep{026.png}{14}%
+
+The molecule of water is then a compound thing, and
+is made up of three atoms,---two of hydrogen and one
+of oxygen,---and therefore the actual size of an atom
+of hydrogen must be less than that represented by the
+above small fraction of an inch. Evidently a thing
+made up of three individual parts and two dissimilar
+substances cannot be spherical, and it will be well to
+bear this in mind in thinking of molecular forms. One
+may imagine the atoms themselves to be spheres, or
+cubes, or tetrahedra, or rings, or disks, or any other
+forms he likes, for the purpose of getting some sort of
+a mental picture of what a molecule might look like if
+it could be seen with a microscope; and it is probable
+that very many persons have hoped or thought that
+the microscope would sometime be so far perfected as
+to enable one to actually look upon the molecules of
+matter and perhaps upon their individual atoms. Let
+us therefore consider the problem of how much more
+powerful a microscope must need to be than any we
+possess to-day, in order that one should see a molecule!
+We will assume atoms to be about the one fifty-millionth
+of an inch in diameter, and that when combined
+into molecules they are geometrically arranged
+so that the diameter of a molecule made up of a large
+number of atoms is proportional to the cube root of
+the number of atoms, as is the case with larger bodies,
+say a box of bullets.
+
+A molecule of water contains three atoms, a molecule
+of alum about one hundred, while, according to
+Mulder, a molecule of albumen contains nearly a
+thousand atoms. Then, according to the assumption,
+\DPPageSep{027.png}{15}%
+the molecule of alum would have a diameter
+equal to
+\[
+\frac{\sqrt[3]{100}}{50,000000} = \frac{1}{10,776000} \text{ of an inch},
+\]
+and that of albumen would be equal to
+\index{Albumen, size of molecule}%
+\[
+\frac{\sqrt[3]{1,000}}{50,000000} = \frac{1}{5,000000} \text{ of an inch.}
+\]
+
+Now, the best microscopes made to-day will enable
+\index{Microscope, magnifying powers}%
+one to see as barely visible a point the one hundred-thousandth
+of an inch, so that such a microscope would
+need to be as much more powerful than it now is as
+one hundred thousand is contained in five millions, that
+is, fifty times, in order to see the albumen molecule, and
+for the alum molecule as many times as one hundred
+thousand is contained in ten million seven hundred
+thousand, that is, one hundred and seven times. Now,
+one who is familiar with the microscope would probably
+admit that one might be made through improved
+methods of making and working glass hereafter to be
+discovered, two or three, or even ten times better than
+the best we have now; but the idea of one being made
+fifty or one hundred times more powerful than we have
+to-day, I do not think would be allowed to have any
+degree of probability. The case may be illustrated as
+follows: Suppose in the days of the stage-coach
+some one had imagined that by some improvement in
+methods of travelling one might some day travel one
+hundred times faster than the stage-coach could then
+go. Twelve miles an hour was not an uncommon rate
+then; but one hundred times that would be twelve
+\DPPageSep{028.png}{16}%
+hundred miles an hour, and that is sixteen times faster
+than the best we can now do, and about twenty-five
+times faster than express-trains now go. As a matter
+of fact, we travel about three or four times faster than
+the best stage-coaches did, and, on a spurt, may go six
+or eight times faster. The powers of the microscope
+have not been doubled within the last fifty years, and I
+suppose more time and ingenuity have been given to
+the problem of improving it than will ever be given
+to it in the same interval again.
+
+There is another and still more serious reason why
+there is no probability that any one will ever see a
+molecule, even though the microscope had the magnifying
+power sufficient to reveal it; namely, the motions
+that molecules are known to have would absolutely
+prevent one from being seen. A free molecule of
+hydrogen has a velocity of motion at ordinary temperatures
+of upwards of a mile in a second, and its direction
+of motion is changed millions of times in a
+second. A microscope magnifies the movements of an
+object as much as it does the object itself. An object
+in the field of a microscope that should have a movement
+no greater than the hundredth of an inch in a
+second could only be glimpsed, so there is no possibility
+of one's being able ever to see a free gaseous
+molecule. Supposing one should be seized and held in
+the field, even then it is to be remembered that it is in
+a state of vibration, changing its form constantly on
+account of its temperature, so that its wriggling would
+prevent any inspection.
+
+Lastly, there is every reason to believe that the
+\DPPageSep{029.png}{17}%
+molecules of all bodies are so perfectly transparent
+that they can no more be seen than can the air, even
+if there were no difficulty from their smallness and
+their motions.
+
+If the atoms of a single element like hydrogen are
+so minute, so restless, and so transparent that no one
+can hope to see them so as to make out their forms
+and what gives them their characteristic properties,
+what shall be said of the case of seventy or more elements
+similarly minute and restless and transparent,
+yet each one easily identified in several ways, physical
+and chemical? Does it seem in any way probable that
+such differences in properties as are exhibited by gold,
+carbon, iron, and oxygen can be due simply to differences
+in size or shape of the atom? Presumably not;
+and the constitution of matter has therefore always
+been a mystery to philosophers, for if one is to attempt
+to philosophize upon the subject in accordance with
+such other knowledge as we have, one would need to
+conclude that if the different kinds of matter, the elements
+as we know them, were formed out of some
+prior kind of substance, as bullets and marbles are
+formed out of lead and clay, then there must be as
+many different kinds of substances out of which the
+different elementary atoms are formed as there are
+different elements, which proposition does not seem to
+have such a degree of probability that any one could
+adopt it. If one sought for the explanation of the
+different properties by assuming that all the different
+kinds of elements were formed out of one and the
+same fundamental substance, then it is equally difficult
+\DPPageSep{030.png}{18}%
+to understand how mere differences in size and shape
+could give such profound differences in quality as the
+elements possess.
+
+Then, again, it appears that the individual atoms of
+\index{Atoms}%
+each element are precisely alike. One atom of hydrogen
+is precisely like every other atom, so far as we
+have definite knowledge. Sir~John Herschel likened
+them to manufactured articles on account of their
+exact similarity. A machine may turn out buttons or
+hooks or wheels or coins so exactly like one another
+that no one can tell them apart. It is really appalling
+to think of the immense numbers of atoms of every
+one of these seventy elements. It is a simple matter
+to calculate how many atoms there must be in say a
+cubic inch. It requires no other process than the
+application of the multiplication table. If the diameter
+of one be the fifty-millionth of an inch, then fifty
+\index{Molecules, size of}%
+million in a row would reach an inch, and a cubic
+inch would contain the number represented by the
+cube of fifty millions, which is
+\[
+125000,000000,000000,000000,
+\]
+($125$~followed by twenty-one ciphers) a number which
+is more conveniently represented by $125 × 10^{21}$. The
+utter impossibility of conceiving such a number will
+be apparent if one would try to represent to himself
+what the magnitude of only one million really is. Go
+out on a clear but moonless night and the heavens
+appear to be filled with stars. Count all that can be
+\index{Stars, their number}%
+seen in a certain portion of the sky, say one-tenth, as
+nearly as can be estimated, and then determine the
+\DPPageSep{031.png}{19}%
+number in the sky that are in sight by multiplication.
+It will be discovered that only about two thousand can
+be seen in the whole sky. If one million stars were to
+be thus visible, it would require five hundred firmaments
+as large and as well filled as the one looked at
+to contain them. With the largest telescopes less than
+a hundred millions of stars are visible; but what shall
+one say when he learns that beyond a peradventure
+the number of atoms in a single cubic inch of matter
+\index{Atoms}%
+of any sort is more than a million of millions times
+all the stars in all the heavens visible in the largest
+telescope.
+
+If one fancies that kind of work he may compute
+the number of atoms that make up the world. Of
+course it will make the number much larger; but when
+written out not so much longer as one might think, for
+when it is multiplied a million times it will add but six
+ciphers to it. Some mathematicians have been to the
+pains to compute the number of atoms there are in the
+visible universe, or, rather, the number that cannot be
+exceeded; for if the number stated above fills a cubic
+inch, if one knows the diameter of the visible universe,
+the space it occupies can readily be known in cubic
+miles and cubic inches, and if all this space was filled
+with atoms one could know and write down their number.
+Astronomers tell us that some stars are so distant
+\index{Stars, their distance}%
+that their light requires as long as five thousand
+years to reach us, although the velocity of light is as
+great as $186,000$ miles in a second, and this distance is
+to be measured in every direction about us. If this be
+our visible universe, then the maximum number of
+\DPPageSep{032.png}{20}%
+\index{Universe, atoms in}%
+atoms in it are calculable, and are stated to be represented
+by the figure 6 followed by ninety-one ciphers,
+or, as it is usually written,
+\[
+6 × 10^{91}.
+\]
+
+If we return to microscopic dimensions, and compute
+the number of atoms, there will be in the smallest
+amount of matter that can be seen with the highest
+powers of the microscope, the one hundred-thousandth
+of an inch, it will be seen that five hundred atoms in
+a row would just reach the distance; and the cube of
+$500$ is $125,000,000$, that could be contained in a space
+so small as to appear like a vanishing-point and the
+structure or details be utterly invisible. We have read
+of spirits that could dance upon the point of a needle,
+but the point of a needle would be a huge platform
+when compared with this last visible point with the
+microscope; and the spirit that should dance upon it
+might be a million times bigger than an atom of matter,
+and not be in danger from vertigo. One may be
+astonished at the amount of intelligence associated
+with the minute brain structure of some of the smaller
+forms of animal life---say the ants; but from the above
+it will be seen that so far as such intelligence is associated
+with atomic and molecular brain structure, the size
+of the brain in the smallest ant, though measured in
+thousandth of an inch, is sufficiently large to involve
+billions of atoms, and the permutations possible are
+almost unlimited. The same idea is applicable to the
+brain of man, and seems to indicate that such differences
+in quality of mind as we see are not so much due
+\DPPageSep{033.png}{21}%
+to the differences in amount of brain, measured in
+cubic inches, as in atomic and molecular structure.
+
+The work of physicists and chemists, carried on for
+many years, has convinced them that none of the processes
+to which matter has been subjected has affected
+its quantity in the slightest degree. A definite quantity
+\index{Atoms, unalterable}%
+of hydrogen, or, what is precisely the same thing,
+a definite number of hydrogen atoms, may be subject
+to any conditions of temperature, may be made to combine
+with other elements successively, forming with
+them solids or liquids or gases, and no atom is
+destroyed nor its individual properties changed in any
+degree. Neither has any phenomenon been discovered
+indicating that new atoms of any kind are ever produced
+by any physical or chemical changes yet known.
+Time does not alter them. Elements that have been
+imbedded in rocks from primeval times, reckoned by
+millions of years, when liberated to-day and tested,
+exhibit precisely the same characteristics as those
+obtained from other sources and that have been subject
+to many artificial conditions. Sometimes a meteorite
+\index{Meteors}%
+reaches the earth, a sample specimen from distant
+space, having moved in some orbit about the sun for
+millions of years. Thousands of such bodies are in
+our possession, and they have been carefully analyzed,
+but no element unfamiliar to the chemist has been
+found among them; and the iron, the nickel, the carbon,
+the hydrogen, and all the rest of the elements that
+compose them, behave in every particular like those
+found on the earth.
+
+So far as spectroscopic evidence goes, it testifies to
+\DPPageSep{034.png}{22}%
+the presence of the same elements in the sun and
+planets and comets; and it is as certain as anything
+physical can be, that the expert chemist here would be
+an equally expert chemist in the planet Mars, if he
+could find a way to cross the immense space that separates
+that star from us.
+
+These facts and conclusions are frequently stated in
+such a form as this, namely, that matter cannot be created
+\index{Atoms, unalterable}%
+or annihilated. All that can fairly be meant by
+such language is that under all the conditions at present
+known, the quantity of matter remains constant;
+and this proposition has a high degree of importance
+in social affairs as well as in philosophy. If matter
+were liable to change in its quantity or quality by being
+subject to various physical conditions, all industries
+involving commercial interests would be in an unstable
+state. If the ton of iron ore should turn out, when
+smelted, only fifty per cent of iron instead of sixty
+per cent, as now,---the rest being either annihilated or
+transformed into lead or gold, or something else,---the
+smelting company would soon go bankrupt, even if
+gold were the product instead of iron, for if gold
+were liable to be produced in that kind of a way,
+its value would be next to nothing as a standard of
+value.
+
+The old alchemists sought to transmute what they
+called the baser elements into gold. It is safe to say,
+if it were physically possible to do it and some one
+should discover the art, and it were an economical process,
+commercial disaster such as the world has never
+known would follow its announcement. It would be as
+\DPPageSep{035.png}{23}%
+if the volcanoes of the world should suddenly begin to
+eject gold in the place of lava.
+
+Stability of physical properties is as essential for
+the stability of society as the regular recurrence
+of day and night; and philosophy would be impossible
+if fundamental data were not in every way immutable.
+
+These physical principles lead to some curious and
+most interesting conclusions with regard to the great
+difference there is between bodies of matter of any
+and all kinds that are familiar to our senses and the
+atoms out of which these larger bodies are composed.
+In every case, where there is a difference in movement
+between two of these larger bodies made up of atoms,
+there is what we call friction, which invariably results
+\index{Friction, its effects}%
+in wearing away some of the material of both. It is
+the result of mechanical friction, to tear away some of
+the surface molecules of the two bodies. Bodies in use
+much, and therefore most subject to friction, become
+worn out. Our clothing is a familiar example; the journals
+of machinery, the tires of wheels, the sharpening
+of tools, the polishing of gems, the weathering of wood
+and stone,---all show that attrition removes some of the
+surface materials of such bodies, but there is nothing
+to indicate that attrition among atoms or molecules ever
+removes any of their material. It appears as if one
+might affirm in the strongest way that the atoms of
+matter never wear out, are not subject to such friction
+and the consequent destruction as comes to all bodies
+made up of them. The molecules of oxygen and nitrogen
+that constitute the air about us have been bumping
+\DPPageSep{036.png}{24}%
+and brushing against each other millions of times a
+second for millions of years probably, and would have
+been worn out or reduced, as the rocks upon the seashore
+have been beaten and ground into sand, if they had
+been subject to friction. So one may be led to the
+conclusion that whatever else may decay atoms do not,
+but remain as types of permanency through all imaginable
+changes---permanent bodies in form and in
+all physical qualities, and permanent in time, capable,
+apparently, of enduring through infinite time. Presenting
+no evidences of growth or decay, they are in strong
+contrast with such bodies of visible magnitude as our
+senses directly perceive. Valleys are lifted up and
+become mountain-tops; mountains wear away and are
+washed into the ocean; the beds of the ocean sink and
+rise; and the boundaries of continents may be worn and
+washed away through the incessant beatings of waves
+against their coasts. Wear and tear go on in all inanimate
+nature unceasingly, so that it is only a question
+of time when everything we see upon the earth will
+have changed beyond identification. The sun is shrinking,
+and must some time cease to shine. The stars,
+too, are changing likewise, because they shine, and
+their places in the firmament will be vacant. All living
+things grow because of change, and decay because
+of more rapid change, and there appears to be nothing
+stable but atoms. If it could be shown that life itself
+and the mind of man were in some way associated with
+\index{Mind, a material habitat for}%
+\index{Mind and matter}%
+atoms of some sort, as inherent properties, the hopes
+\index{Atoms, life associated with}%
+and longings cherished by mankind for continuous existence
+\index{Immortality}%
+beyond the short term of three score years and
+\DPPageSep{037.png}{25}%
+ten would give way to convictions as strong as one
+has in any physical phenomenon whatever; the evidence
+would be demonstrative in the same sense as
+it is for the existence of atoms and their physical
+qualities.
+%\DPPageSep{038.png}{26}%
+
+
+\Chapter{II}{The Ether}{26}
+
+\index{Ether}%
+
+\First{An} incandescent electric lamp consists of a fine
+thread of carbon fixed in a glass bulb from which the
+air has been exhausted. When a proper current of
+electricity is permitted to traverse the carbon filament,
+it becomes white-hot and gives out light like any other
+hot body. Other luminous bodies are in the air, and
+one might infer that the light was transmitted from the
+heated body to the eye by the material of the air itself.
+The light in the vacuum shows that this is not necessarily
+so, for the more perfect the vacuum is made the
+more freely does the light from the filament reach the
+glass bulb that encloses it. One is therefore led to
+infer that matter is not the agent that transmits light.
+The light of the sun reaches us after travelling through
+ninety-three millions of miles of space in about eight
+\index{Light, its velocity}%
+minutes. There are the best of reasons for believing
+that the atmosphere of the earth does not reach at
+most more than two hundred miles upwards from the
+\index{Atmosphere, height of}%
+surface, and its density at the height of only one hundred
+miles is such that there would be only about one
+molecule to the cubic foot.
+
+It is not unlikely that there are free-roving molecules
+in space, as there are meteors in all directions about
+\index{Meteors}%
+\DPPageSep{039.png}{27}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+us, varying in size from fractions of a grain to masses
+weighing some tons, but the distance apart of these
+bodies is so great on the average that they cannot be
+considered as either help or hindrance to the passage of
+the light of either sun or stars. It is known with certainty
+that what we call the light from shining bodies
+is a kind of wave motion. The phenomena of interference,
+which can be brought about in several different
+ways, and which was referred to in the first chapter
+when speaking of the colors of soap-bubbles, show
+this. It is possible to annihilate two rays of light by
+making one of them to follow the other in a certain
+way; and one cannot conceive that two particles of matter
+of any sort could annihilate each other by simply
+changing their positions, but this is precisely what
+happens in light.
+
+Wave motions of all kinds can cancel similar wave
+motions; for the wave consists of periodic movements,
+a crest and a trough, and when the crest and
+trough of one wave are superposed upon the trough
+and crest of another similar one, the result is the
+destruction of both waves. The lengths of these waves
+have been measured by a great many persons in various
+parts of the world, and they all concur that light
+can only be explained by wave motions such as they
+measure.
+
+If there be wave motions, evidently there must be
+something moved. One cannot conceive of a wave
+movement when there is nothing that can be moved;
+so men have been compelled to believe that there is
+some medium between the sun and the earth that is
+\DPPageSep{040.png}{28}%
+\index{Light, its velocity}%
+\index{Stars, their distance}%
+\index{Sun, its distance}%
+\index{Universe, its size}%
+capable of wave motion, and this medium they have
+agreed to call \emph{the ether}.
+
+If one admits the existence of ether between the sun
+and the earth as the agency for the transmission of
+light, he will need to do much more than that. The
+sun is but about ninety-three millions of miles distant,
+but most of the planets are hundreds of millions and
+some of them thousands of millions of miles from us,
+and the light comes from them too; so the ether must
+extend through the space occupied by the solar system,
+the diameter of which is six thousand millions of miles,
+and to cross this space light requires nine hours,
+though going at the rate of one hundred and eighty-six
+thousand miles per second.
+
+Then there are the stars beyond our solar system,
+the nearest one so distant as to require three and a
+half years for the light to get to us at the same rate;
+and some of these are so remote that thousands of years
+are needed for their light to arrive. That light we see
+from them to-day left them before America was discovered,
+before Jesus was born, before the pyramids
+were built, and for all we should be able to see they
+might have ceased to exist long ago, though their light
+continues to shine. So the ether must extend to those
+most distant stars we can see, and that, too, in every
+direction. There is no exaggeration in the statement
+that our visible universe is so great that light requires
+ten thousand years to cross its diameter. There is no
+reason, either, for setting that as a boundary to its
+magnitude; but wherever light comes from to us, there
+must this medium, the ether, be.
+\DPPageSep{041.png}{29}%
+\index{Medium, necessity for}%
+
+But there are other and just as good reasons for
+thinking there must be some medium between bodies,
+even when all atoms and molecules have been removed.
+For instance, everybody knows that one magnet affects
+another at a distance from it, and there is no kind of
+substance known that will prevent such action when
+interposed between them.
+
+If one of these magnets be placed in the most perfect
+vacuum that can be made, it still acts as it would
+in the air, only with still greater freedom. One cannot
+believe that one body can thus act upon another body
+without some kind of a medium between them. Is it
+not absurd to think otherwise? One may, if there
+appears to him to be a good reason, suppose that there
+is a magnetic medium or ether different from that one
+employed in the transmission of light; but there is a
+similar need for imagining one for the effects produced
+by electrified bodies upon other bodies in their neighborhood.
+An electrified glass rod will attract a pith
+ball or anything else just as well in a vacuum as out of
+it; and it is certain that electrical attraction and magnetic
+attraction are not identical, for an electrified body
+will attract one kind of thing as well as another, while
+a magnet is selective in its effects, and affects iron
+chiefly. Hence, if each different effect in a vacuum
+is to be attributed to some different kind of medium,
+there would need to be an electric ether in addition
+to the other two.
+
+Then there is gravitative attraction, which has before
+been mentioned. If it is not rational to think that one
+body can act upon another body not in contact with it
+\DPPageSep{042.png}{30}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+and without some medium between them, then one is
+bound to admit that the gravitative effects observed,
+say between the moon and the earth, the sun and the
+earth, and in every other case, are due to the action of
+some medium between them. Neither is it at all needful
+to be able to explain \emph{how} the medium acts thus and
+thus, or even to imagine how it might, in order to firmly
+believe that there must be one.
+
+Here are four cases of apparent action at a distance
+of one body upon another, requiring some sort of an
+intermediate agency; and, unless there be some good
+reason for thinking there are several such media occupying
+the same space apparently, it is much more
+philosophical to believe it likely that one medium
+exists capable of transmitting effects of the different
+kinds; and especially will this appear to be truer if it is
+known, as it is known, that the magnetic and electric
+effects are transmitted with the same velocity as is the
+light. So that physicists to-day quite concur in the
+belief that what was called at first the luminiferous
+ether, on account of its function in transmitting light,
+is the same medium that is concerned in the other phenomena
+of magnetism, electricity, and gravitation.
+
+It is likewise true that there are some physicists who
+hold rather lightly upon this belief, taking it as a convenient
+working hypothesis, and who would seem to be
+ready in a minute to surrender the idea, unless it had
+been demonstrated in the same way as the existence of
+matter and of motion has been. But this is not the
+attitude of philosophic minds.
+
+Sir Isaac Newton deduced from the observed motions
+\DPPageSep{043.png}{31}%
+of the heavenly bodies the fact that they attract
+each other according to the law now known as the law
+of gravitation, but he says nothing about \emph{how} bodies can
+affect each other. That is, in his ``Principia'' he does
+\index{Principia}%
+not attempt to explain gravitation. He explicitly does
+say, however, that he has not employed hypotheses in
+his work, yet we know from other of his writings that
+the idea of a medium was constantly in his mind. His
+``Principia'' closes thus:---
+\begin{Quote}
+``And now we might add something concerning a
+most subtle spirit which pervades and lies hid in all
+\Pagelabel{31}%
+gross bodies; by the force and action of which spirit
+the particles of bodies mutually attract one another at
+near distances and cohere if contiguous; and electric
+bodies operate to greater distances as well repelling
+as attracting the neighboring corpuscles, and light is
+emitted, reflected, inflected, and heats bodies; and all
+sensation is excited, and the members of animal bodies
+move at the command of the will, namely, by the vibrations
+of this spirit mutually propagated along the solid
+filaments of the nerves from the outward organs of
+sense to the brain, and from the brain to the muscles.
+But these things cannot be explained in few words, nor
+are we furnished with that sufficiency of experiments
+which is required to an accurate determination and
+demonstration of the laws by which this electric and
+elastic spirit operates.''
+\end{Quote}
+
+This shows plainly enough that he believed that
+some medium, different from matter, was essential for
+a mechanical conception of the phenomena he alluded
+to. In a letter to Bentley he states his philosophical
+judgment upon the subject in still stronger terms, and
+it shows, too, the sense in which he is to be understood
+when he says: ``I frame no hypotheses''---%
+\DPPageSep{044.png}{32}%
+which has frequently been repeated to adventurous
+hypothecators as the example of the model scientific
+man. Hear him!
+\begin{Quote}
+``It is inconceivable that inanimate brute matter
+should, without the mediation of something else which
+is not material, operate upon and affect other matter
+without mutual contact, as it must do if gravitation in
+the sense of Epicurus be essential and inherent in it.~\ldots
+That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential
+to matter so that one body can act upon another at
+a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of
+anything else, by and through which their action and
+force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me
+so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in
+philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking
+can ever fall into it.''
+\end{Quote}
+
+Newton uses the word \emph{Spirit} in the sense of a substance
+entirely different from matter (see \Pageref{page}{31}).
+Evidently Newton was so strong a believer in the
+medium that we call the ether, though he could not
+\index{Ether}%
+work out its mode of action, that he was ready to discount
+the intelligence of any man who doubted it.\footnote
+ {In 1708 Newton wrote thus: ``Perhaps the whole frame of nature may be
+ nothing but various contextures of some certain etherial spirits or vapors, condensed,
+ as it were, by precipitation; and after condensation wrought into various
+ forms, at first by the immediate hand of the Creator, and ever after by the power
+ of nature.''
+
+ These with his other acute remarks concerning what we now call the ether
+ lead us to infer that his mechanical instincts were more to be trusted in this field
+ than his more labored efforts.}
+
+If our knowledge of the existence of the ether is
+not so positive as it is for matter, but is inferential, it
+will be readily understood that the knowledge we have
+of its properties cannot be very exhaustive. Some
+have imagined that it was only a finer grained kind of
+\DPPageSep{045.png}{33}%
+matter than that we know as the elements, and that it
+must be made up of atoms, though almost infinitesimal
+in size. Others think it cannot be granular at all, but
+forms a continuous substance throughout space. By
+``continuous'' is meant that there are no interstices in
+it: that it is constituted like a jelly, only not made up
+of distinct parts or atoms, so there can be no such thing
+as separating one part from another, leaving a vacuous
+cavity or rent between them. One of the reasons for
+thinking this to be the case is, that if it were made up
+of finer atoms or of atoms at all, such waves as those
+of light could not be transmitted by it. Longitudinal
+waves, like those of sound in air, can be transmitted
+by atomic or molecular structures but not transverse
+waves, that is, such as are at right angles to the direction
+of propagation. Some of these light waves are as
+short as the hundred-thousandth of an inch, and some
+are as long as the one two-thousandth of an inch, and
+perhaps longer. Yet all of them are transmitted with
+the same velocity in any and every direction. From
+the fact that light travels with the same velocity in
+every direction, it is inferred that the ether is not only
+homogeneous, but its properties are alike in every
+direction. As light is transmitted in straight lines, it
+seems to follow that there is no difference in its quality
+in different parts of space.
+
+That wave motions travel with such high velocity in
+it has been interpreted as proving it to have a high
+degree of elasticity, while the fact that it offers no
+appreciable resistance to the movements of bodies of
+matter in it is supposed to indicate that its density is
+very small.
+\DPPageSep{046.png}{34}%
+\index{Earth, velocity of, in space}%
+\index{Friction, its effects}%
+
+There are some, however, who think that such terms
+as elasticity and density are not appropriately applied
+to the ether. These terms signify properties of atoms
+\index{Ether}%
+and molecules. If density signifies compactness of
+atoms, then the word could not apply to something not
+composed of atoms. In like manner, if elasticity
+means ability to recover form after deformation, then it
+is not applicable to substances that cannot be deformed,
+and it is customary to speak of the ether as
+being incompressible. Still, it is certain that stresses
+may be set up in it in various ways, and that these
+conditions may be propagated, in certain cases in
+straight lines, in other cases in curved lines, so whether
+the explanation be forthcoming or not, there is no
+doubt about the facts.
+
+There is no evidence at all that the ether is subject
+to gravitative action, or that it offers any resistance to
+a body moving in it. That is to say, it gives no evidence
+of friction. Here is the earth rotating upon its
+axis, and the velocity of rotation at the equator is a
+thousand miles an hour, and if there were an appreciable
+amount of friction the earth must slowly be coming
+to rest like a top spun in the air. Yet the astronomers
+tell us that the length of the day has not changed so
+much as the hundredth of a second within the last two
+thousand years. Again the earth revolves in its orbit
+about the sun at the average rate of nineteen miles a
+second, and if the ether through which it moves offered
+any resistance to the motion, the length of the year
+would be changed, but no such change has happened
+in historic times. Again, such bodies as comets move
+\DPPageSep{047.png}{35}%
+\index{Thomson, Sir Wm.}%
+\index{Vortex rings in air}%
+very much faster than the earth; some have been
+known to have a velocity of three hundred miles per
+second when near the sun, but the comets complete
+their circuits and give no evidence of slackened speed
+due to friction in space.
+
+If, then, the ether \emph{fills} all space, is not atomic in
+structure, presents no friction to bodies moving through
+it, and is not subject to the law of gravitation, it does
+not seem proper to call it matter. One might speak of
+it as a substance if he wants another word than its
+specific name for it. As for myself, I make a sharp
+distinction between the ether and matter, and feel
+somewhat confused to hear one speak of the ether as
+matter.
+
+Nearly thirty years ago Helmholtz investigated, in a
+\index{Helmholtz}%
+mathematical way, the properties of vortical motions,
+and, among others, pointed out that if a vortical motion
+was set up in a frictionless medium, the motion would
+be permanent, and it could not be transformed. Sir
+William Thomson at once imagined that if such
+motions were set up in the ether, the persistence of
+their form and the possibility of a variety of motions
+would correspond very closely with the properties that
+the atoms of matter are known to possess. Such vortical
+motions as are here alluded to, all have seen, as
+they are often formed by locomotives when about starting,
+if the air be quiescent. Horizontal rings, three
+or four feet in diameter, may be seen to rise wriggling
+into the air sometimes to the height of several
+hundred feet. They may be formed also by smokers
+by a vigorous throat movement forcibly puffing the
+\DPPageSep{048.png}{36}%
+smoke from their mouths, and they can be made
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbtp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \fbox{\Graphic{0.9\linewidth}{048a}}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{1}{Diag.\ 1.}
+\end{figure}
+artificially by providing a box having a hole on one
+side an inch or two in diameter and the side opposite
+covered with a piece of cloth. A saucer containing
+strong ammonia water and another with strong hydrochloric
+acid may be set inside, and dense fumes will
+fill the box. If the cloth be struck by the hand, a ring
+will issue from the hole, and may go forward several
+feet, and its behavior may be studied. Such as are
+formed in the air under such conditions present so
+many interesting phenomena that it is worth the while
+here to allude to them for the sake of helping the
+mind to a clearer idea of how some of the properties
+exhibited by matter may be accounted for.\footnote
+ {The method of producing these vortex rings and their phenomena are fully
+ explained in ``The Art of Projecting.'' By Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear. Illustrated\DPtypo{}{.}
+ \$2.00. Published by Lee and Shepard, Boston.}
+
+\DPPageSep{049.png}{37}%
+\index{Vortex rings, properties of}%
+
+1. The ring once formed consists of a definite
+amount of the gaseous material of the air in a state of
+rotation, %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[11]{r}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.375in}{049a}
+ \Caption{2}{Diag.\ 2.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+and in its movements afterwards retains the
+same material. It is to be noted
+that the ring is formed in the air,
+the white fumes serving merely to
+make the ring visible. The ring
+moves forward in a straight line
+in the direction it is started, just
+as if it were a solid body. It may
+move very fast too,---ten feet a
+second or more, and reach the
+distant side of the room, but it
+always moves of its own motion in a direction perpendicular
+to the plane of the ring.
+
+2. It possesses momentum, and will push against
+the object it hits.
+
+3. If made to move rapidly adjacent to a surface
+like a wall or table, it will move towards it as if it were
+attracted by it, and generally will be broken up by
+impact against it.
+
+4. A light body, like a feather or thread, will be
+apparently pushed out of the way in front of it, and
+drawn towards it if behind it---phenomena like attraction
+and repulsion.
+
+5. If two such rings bump together at their edges,
+each one will vibrate with well-marked nodes and loops,
+showing that, as rings, they are elastic bodies, and that
+their period of vibration depends upon the rate of the
+rotation.
+
+6. If two such rings be moving in the same line, but
+\DPPageSep{050.png}{38}%
+the hindmost one swifter so as to overtake the other,
+the foremost one enlarges its diameter while the hinder
+one contracts until it can go through the former, when
+each recovers its original dimensions.
+
+7. If two meet in the same line, going in opposite
+directions, the smaller one goes through the larger and
+may be brought to a standstill in the air for a short
+time until the other has got some inches away, when it
+starts on in the same direction as before.
+
+8. If two similar ones are formed at the same time,
+side by side, at a distance of an inch or two, they always
+collide at once as if they had a mutual attraction. The
+result of the collision may be the destruction of one or
+both, or---
+
+9. Each one may break at the point of impact, and
+the opposite ends may weld together, forming a single
+ring which will move on as if it had been singly formed,
+or---
+
+10. Instead of breaking they may rebound from each
+other, but always at right angles to the plane in which
+they were moving at first; that is to say, if they were
+moving in a horizontal plane before impact, they will
+rebound from each other in a vertical plane.
+
+11. Three rings may in like manner be made to join
+into one.
+
+12. The material of the ring may often be seen to
+be in rotation about the ring, while the ring, as a whole,
+does not rotate at all, a rotary wave.
+
+13. The parts of a ring may be in a state of vibration
+in the ring without changing its circular form,
+somewhat as if the ring were tubular and two bodies
+\DPPageSep{051.png}{39}%
+\index{Elasticity due to motion}%
+should move up on opposite sides till they met and
+rebounded to meet below, and so on.
+\Pagelabel{39}%
+
+All these, and some other just as curious phenomena,
+may be observed in vortex rings, and may fairly be said
+to be due to the properties of the rings themselves.
+For instance, the vibratory motions alluded to in the
+fifth show that elasticity is a property of the ring,
+and that the degree of elasticity does not depend upon
+what the ring is made of, but upon the kind and
+degree of motion that constitutes the ring. If such a
+ring could be produced in material not subject to friction,
+none of the motion could be dissipated, and we
+should have a permanent structure, possessing several
+properties such as definite dimensions, volume, elasticity,
+attraction, and so on, all due to the shape and
+motions involved.
+
+Imagine, then, that vortex rings were in some way
+formed in the ether, constituted of ether. If the ether
+be, as it is generally believed to be, frictionless, then
+such a thing would persist indefinitely: it would have
+just that quality of durability that atoms seem to possess.
+It would possess physical attributes, form, magnitude,
+density, energy, that is, it would not be inert.
+It would be elastic, executing a definite number of
+vibrations per second. This property of elasticity has
+generally heretofore been assumed to be a peculiar
+endowment of ordinary matter, and one was at liberty
+to imagine some matter without it because not so made.
+This view implies that elasticity is a necessary property
+of vortex rings; for as the velocity of rotation is
+reduced, so is the degree of elasticity, and if there was
+\DPPageSep{052.png}{40}%
+\index{Bonnenburger's apparatus}%
+simply a ring without being in rotation, it would have
+no elasticity at all, neither would it have any qualities
+different from the medium it was imbedded in.
+
+That such a quality as elasticity may be due solely to
+\Pagelabel{40}%
+motion, and varying with it, one may assure himself
+with that piece of apparatus to be found in most collections
+in schools known as Bonnenburger's. It consists
+of a disk of metal, mounted in gimbals so it can
+be set spinning %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.375in}{052a}
+ \Caption{3}{Diag.\ 3.---\textsc{Bonnenburger's Apparatus.}}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+in any plane. If
+this be set spinning in a vertical
+plane it becomes tolerably rigid
+in that plane, and cannot be moved
+out of it but by the employment
+of quite a degree of pressure. If
+the framework be quickly struck
+by the finger while thus spinning,
+the wheel will begin to rock back
+and forth like the prong of a
+tuning-fork, and the more rapid
+the rotation the higher the rate
+of vibration. When the velocity
+of rotation becomes slow the
+vibratory motion may be as slow
+as once a second, and, of course, when the ring is not
+revolving it will not vibrate at all. Thus there is fairly
+good physical reason for thinking that what we call
+elasticity in the atoms of matter may be due simply
+to the motion they possess, and \emph{how} that may be one
+can understand if atoms be vortex rings.
+
+One may properly ask how one vortex ring can differ
+from another so there could be so many as seventy or
+\DPPageSep{053.png}{41}%
+more different kinds of atoms. To this it may be said
+that such rings may differ from each other not only in
+size but in their rate of rotation: the ring may be a
+thick one or a thin one, may rotate relatively fast or
+slow, may contain a greater or less amount of the ether.
+The word ``mass'' in physics is used to denote a quantity
+of matter as measured by its resistance to pressure
+tending to move it as a whole. Thus if a pressure of
+one pound be applied to two different bodies for say
+one second, and one of them was moved an inch and
+the other but half an inch when otherwise they were
+alike free to move, we would say that one had twice the
+mass of the other---its resistance to being moved was
+twice as great as the other.
+
+In the case of the Bonnenburger's rotating disk, the
+resistance to the pressure tending to move it depends
+upon the rate of rotation, and a thin and swift moving
+disk would offer much greater resistance than a much
+larger one with a slower speed. So one might infer
+that the difference in what is called mass among the
+atoms of matter might be due simply to the different
+speeds with which the rings rotate, rather than in the
+absolute volume of ether in the state of rotation.
+There are other reasons than these for thinking that
+motion is the chief characteristic of matter. Chemists
+have discovered that both the chemical and physical
+properties of all kinds of matter are functions of their
+mass or relative atomic weights, and that they may be
+arranged in a harmonic series. Harmonic relations
+may imply either relations of position or of motion.
+But the fundamental properties of matter do not change
+\DPPageSep{054.png}{42}%
+by changing its position, and one is therefore led to the
+conclusion that one must look to the various kinds of
+motion involved among atoms for the explanation of all
+their properties and all their phenomena.
+
+There is another very important and peculiar property
+possessed by vortex rings; viz., there cannot be
+such a thing as half a ring or any fragment of one.
+Break such a ring in two and there is not left the two
+halves; not only is the ring broken, but each part at once
+vanishes into the indistinguishable substance that composed
+it, and all the properties that characterized it as a
+ring have vanished with it.
+
+This greatly aids one to understand that matter may
+not be infinitely divisible. Over and over again have
+philosophers asserted that it was impossible to imagine
+an atom of matter so small that it could not in imagination
+be again broken into two or more parts. A vortex
+ring, however, shows how the thing can be done.
+If an atom be a ring, when it is disrupted it is at once
+dissolved into ether, and that is the end of it. There
+are no fragments of the ring.
+
+One, however, must not infer from the above treatment
+that it represents knowledge of a demonstrated
+kind, for it does not. It was remarked in the first
+chapter that atoms are too minute to be seen and
+studied as one would study an animalcule or a blood
+corpuscle, and one's knowledge must be altogether
+inferential concerning them; but what knowledge we do
+have, and the inferences that may properly be drawn
+from it, all tend to convince one that matter and the
+ether are most intimately related to each other, and
+\DPPageSep{055.png}{43}%
+that some such theory as the vortex ring theory of
+matter must be true.
+
+Now, it is either that theory or nothing. There is
+no other one that has any degree of probability at all.
+If what is presented herewith is not the precise truth
+concerning a most difficult subject, it may have the
+merit of helping one to conceive the possibilities there
+may be of deducing qualities from motions, and rid him
+of the idea that matter consists necessarily of some
+created things that have no necessary relations to the
+rest of the universe beyond the properties impressed
+by fiat. In the latter case one could never hope to
+understand them, because there could be no \emph{necessary}
+reason for their being as they are, rather than some
+other way, whereas, in the former case, the mechanical
+relations can be understood, and there is left the possibility
+that by and by, with more light and knowledge,
+one may know the physical conditions under which
+matter itself came into existence.
+%\DPPageSep{056.png}{44}%
+
+
+\Chapter{III}{Motion}{44}
+
+\First{Everybody} has so clear a conception of motion that
+there would not seem to be any difficulty in defining it
+absolutely, but philosophers and others from remote
+times till now have been perplexed by its problems.
+How can Achilles ever overtake the tortoise, though
+he runs ten times faster? How can the top of a
+cart-wheel move faster than the bottom? If the sun
+cannot set above the horizon and cannot set below
+it, how can he set at all? In the last chapter some
+phenomena were alluded to which were attributed to
+motions of different kinds, and one must needs have a
+definite notion of what he is talking about in order that
+his words shall convey to himself, as well as others,
+the information he would impart. Rest and motion are
+contrasted conditions of bodies, so if a body is at rest
+we say it is without motion, and \textit{vice versa}. If two persons
+sit side by side in a house they may be said to be
+at rest, but if they sit side by side in a railroad car they
+will be at rest relative to each other as they were
+before, but may be in motion with reference to things
+outside the car. If, as a vessel sails past the end of a
+wharf, a person on board would talk with a person
+standing upon the wharf, he will walk so as to keep
+\DPPageSep{057.png}{45}%
+opposite the man standing still, and the two will be
+at rest in relation to each other, while one will be in
+motion with reference to everything on board the vessel.
+Thus it appears that rest and motion are relative
+terms, and can only be understood to apply to the
+relative continuous position of two bodies or objects.
+Hence, if there were but one object in the universe there
+could be no such thing as change of position, for that
+implies another body with which position may be compared
+at intervals. But such a single body might have
+some internal motions by which there was a relative
+change of position of its parts with reference to themselves.
+For instance, a tuning-fork might be at rest as
+a whole with reference to all other bodies, yet its prongs
+might vibrate towards and away from each other, the
+centre of mass or the centre of gravity of the fork itself
+not moving in the slightest degree either with reference
+to itself or anything outside itself. Again, a body might
+spin like a top, and there would be no change of position
+of the body as a whole with reference to any other
+body, nor change of position of the parts with reference
+to each other, yet there would be a change of position
+of the parts with reference to all bodies outside itself.
+Hence, a brief definition of motion is not so easy to
+give.
+
+One might say that motion was the change of position
+of a body with reference to other bodies, or the change
+of position of the parts of a body with reference to each
+other, or the change of position of the parts of a body
+with reference to other bodies. But these would not cover
+all possible cases. There need be no trouble, however,
+\DPPageSep{058.png}{46}%
+\index{Molecules, size of}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+in particular cases, because there will always be data at
+hand to determine the character and direction of the
+motion.
+
+One may study the geometry of positions and changing
+positions of mathematical points, and attend only to
+rates and direction of motion of all sorts, without considering
+the motions of bodies of real magnitude possessing
+physical properties like matter. The science
+that has to do with such ideal conditions is called \emph{kinematics}.
+\index{Kinematics}%
+Whenever the motions of matter are considered,
+the science is called \emph{kinetics}. Of course all
+\index{Kinetics}%
+phenomena involve the motions of matter. Although
+one sees a great variety of motions, a few examples of
+particular sorts may be helpful in analyzing them.
+
+1. The drifting of clouds, the flight of birds, of
+arrows, of bullets, of meteors, the sailing of vessels, the
+running of locomotives, are examples of one kind of
+motion; namely, where the change of position is that
+of the body as a whole with reference to other bodies
+external to it. The cloud may drift with the air, but
+with reference to the surface of the earth it moves.
+Where a body thus moves straight on continuously with
+reference to other bodies, whether the distance moved
+be long or short, the motion is called \emph{translatory} or
+\emph{free-path motion}. The latter term is most frequently
+applied to the movements of the molecules of a gas.
+In ordinary air the distance apart of the molecules is on
+the average about the one two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth
+of an inch, but the molecules themselves being
+only one fifty-millionth of an inch in diameter, it will
+be seen that they have a space to move in about two
+\DPPageSep{059.png}{47}%
+\index{Vacuum}%
+hundred times their own diameter before coming in
+collision with another one; and after collision their
+direction is only changed when they go on to another
+collision, and we say that their free path is on an average
+about the two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of an
+inch. With some modern air-pumps it is possible to
+reduce the amount of air in a space so that the average
+free path of a remaining molecule will be a foot or more;
+but neither the size of the moving body, nor the distance
+hundred times their own diameter before coming in
+collision with another one; and after collision their
+direction is only changed when they go on to another
+collision, and we say that their free path is on an average
+about the two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of an
+inch. With some modern air-pumps it is possible to
+reduce the amount of air in a space so that the average
+free path of a remaining molecule will be a foot or more;
+but neither the size of the moving body, nor the distance
+it moves, nor the velocity with which it moves,
+makes any essential difference in the specific kind of
+motion: so the movements of air particles among themselves,
+of billiard-balls between impacts, of a bullet on
+its way to the target, and of a planet or comet in its
+orbit, are all examples of the same kind of motion,
+namely, translational.
+
+2. The swaying of the branches of trees when
+moved by the wind, the swinging of the pendulums
+of clocks, the movement of the piston in a steam-engine,
+of the prongs of tuning-forks, the reeds and
+strings in musical instruments, are examples of a different
+kind of motion, inasmuch as the changes of position
+relate to the body itself rather than to external bodies.
+The tuning-fork is the type of them all, and together
+they are called \emph{vibratory} motions. Sometimes, when
+the bodies that move thus are large and the motion conspicuous,
+as, for example, in the pendulum of the clock,
+and the steam-engine piston, the motion is spoken of
+as \emph{oscillatory}. In such cases, as in the former one, it
+should be borne in mind that mere differences in the
+size of bodies, or of the rate of motion, does not in any
+\DPPageSep{060.png}{48}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+manner change the character of the motion, so the
+name that is applicable to one will be equally applicable
+to all. If one calls the movement of a vibrating tuning-fork
+\emph{vibratory}, the same term may be applied to an
+atom if it goes through a like periodic change of form,
+for that is the chief characteristic of vibratory motion;
+and hereafter it will appear how needful it is to bear
+this in mind, for what a given amount of motion will
+do will be seen to depend altogether upon the kind of
+motion.
+
+3. The spinning-top, the balance-wheels of engines,
+the wheels of machines of all kinds, the turning of the
+earth, and each member of the solar system upon its
+axis, are examples of another sort, where the displacement
+is not, as in the last, between parts of the same
+body, but a change in the relative position of each part
+of a body to what is outside itself. The pendulum of a
+clock swings to and fro, but its point of suspension does
+not move; whereas every part of a turning-wheel is
+presented to opposite parts of space in the plane of its
+revolution. This motion is called \emph{rotary}, and just as in
+the other two cases, I wish to emphasize the fact that
+the term is properly applicable to masses of matter of
+all degrees of magnitude; so an atom may spin on its
+axis as well as the earth or sun, and the phenomena it
+will be competent to produce by such spinning will be
+very different from that produced by its vibrations or
+free-path motions.
+
+These three kinds are all of the primary ones: all
+the others we see are made up of these or their compounds.
+For instance, a compound of a free-path
+\DPPageSep{061.png}{49}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+\index{Motion, molecular and atomic}%
+motion with a vibratory motion will give a wave or
+sinuous motion if the direction of the vibration be at
+right angles to the free path. A combination of a free-path
+with a rotary may give a spiral motion, as illustrated
+by the movement of a screw when pushed and
+turned into a piece of wood.
+
+In a sewing-machine may be seen all of these kinds
+of motion and some other compounds more complex
+than the ones spoken of, but one may readily analyze
+them into the three primary ones.
+
+These forms of motion have been spoken of as if
+they were peculiar to matter; but it ought not to be
+inferred that motion is not attributable to the ether.
+Indeed, we know that some sorts of motions are propagated
+in the ether. For instance, what we call light
+is an example. Its form is \emph{undulatory}; and, as we have
+seen above, an undulatory motion is a compound of a
+rectilinear and a vibratory. A spiral movement in the
+ether is also known, and it is sometimes called rotary-polarized
+light: its motion is like that of a screw, and
+we know that such a motion is a compound of a rectilinear
+and a rotary. Rotary motions in the ether are
+also known as taking place in front of magnetic poles,
+and are the results of the magnetism imparted to the
+iron or other substance. I am not aware that any
+simple rectilinear motion is known to occur in the
+ether: there may be, and likely enough is, such.
+
+For convenience, motions that are large enough to
+be visible are called \emph{mechanical motions}, while those
+too minute to be seen are often called \emph{molecular} or
+\emph{atomic}. Sometimes these molecular and atomic motions
+\DPPageSep{062.png}{50}%
+\index{Motion, velocity of}%
+are spoken of as if they were mysterious, and not to be
+understood in the same sense as the larger ones that
+are visible to us; but it is difficult to justify any such
+distinction, and difficult to imagine that any kind of a
+motion a large piece of matter may have, a small particle
+or atom cannot have, and \textit{vice versa}. It would
+seem probable that whoever finds a difficulty in this
+cannot have strong mechanical aptitudes, and is not
+gifted with an adequate scientific imagination.
+
+A free body of any kind and of any magnitude may
+have any kind of a motion whatever, and may move in
+any direction and with different velocities, but the term
+\index{Velocities}%
+velocity is used in different senses when applied to different
+kinds of motion. Thus the velocity of an atom
+in its free path, of a musket-bullet, of sound-waves, is
+measured in feet per second. The velocity of vibrating
+bodies is indicated by the number of vibrations they
+make per second. A tuning-fork making two hundred
+and fifty-six vibrations in a second is said to have that
+rate of vibration, whether the actual distance moved be
+one distance or another, which, of course, will depend
+upon the amplitude of each individual swing; while
+rotational velocity is generally specified by giving the
+number of rotations per second, or per minute, or some
+other unit interval of time. A top may spin a hundred
+times a second, a balance-wheel of a steam-engine turn
+four times, while the earth makes one revolution in a
+day of twenty-four hours. The range in velocities of
+these different kinds that have been measured is very
+great indeed. In free-path or translational motion,
+there may be the snail's pace, perhaps less than an
+\DPPageSep{063.png}{51}%
+inch a minute, the pace of a man walking say three
+miles an hour, which is at the rate of eighty-eight feet
+per minute. A race-horse may trot a mile in two
+minutes and ten seconds, which is forty feet per
+second. A steam-locomotive may run seventy miles
+an hour, which is nearly one hundred feet per second.
+A rifle-bullet may go a thousand feet, and a cannon-ball
+two thousand feet in a second. The earth in its orbital
+motion goes seventeen miles per second; meteors come
+to the earth, from space, sometimes having a velocity
+of fifty or more miles per second, while comets may
+reach the velocity of nearly four hundred miles in the
+same time when near the sun. These are the velocities
+of bodies of visible magnitude, but some of the motions
+of molecules are fairly comparable with some of these.
+Thus a molecule of common air is moving in its free
+path about sixteen hundred feet per second, while a
+molecule of hydrogen, which is much lighter, goes
+more than six-thousand feet---upwards of a mile---in the
+same time. As remarked before, the free path for air
+molecules having but about the two-hundred-thousandth
+part of an inch, it must change its direction an enormous
+number of times in a second,---as many times as
+one two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of an inch is contained
+in sixteen hundred feet;
+\[
+250,000 × 12 × 1,600 = 4800,000000.
+\]
+Four thousand eight hundred millions of times. How
+one may assure himself that such a statement is not
+fabulous will be pointed out farther on; so far one
+needs only to trust the multiplication table.
+\DPPageSep{064.png}{52}%
+
+For vibratory rates there are also enormous ranges:
+there are the slow oscillatory movements of swinging
+pendulums of various lengths, sometimes occupying
+several seconds for the execution of one vibration;
+piano-strings having a range from about forty per
+second to four thousand; the chirrup of crickets about
+three thousand. Short whistles and steel rods have
+been made that will make as many as twenty thousand
+vibrations per second,---a rate much higher than can be
+\index{Vibrations per second}%
+perceived by most persons, though occasionally abnormal
+hearing in an individual enables him to hear sounds
+to which ordinary ears are entirely deaf. When the
+number of vibrations per second becomes so great that
+they cannot be individually seen nor heard, one must
+trust his judgment and the properties of matter in
+determining whether there really are any still more
+rapid. It has been found by experiment that the number
+of vibrations a given body can make when it is
+struck so as to produce a sound depends upon its shape,
+its size, its density, and its degree of elasticity. If a
+steel rod, having a given diameter and length, makes,
+when struck, five hundred vibrations per second, another
+similar one with but half the length will make twice as
+many in the same time. If one were made of something
+still more elastic than steel, and of the same size,
+the vibratory rate would be higher still.
+
+A steel tuning-fork three inches long may make five
+hundred vibrations per second; if it were only the one
+fifty-millionth of an inch long it would make not less
+than $30000,000000$ vibrations per second; and if it
+were made of a substance like ether it would make as
+\DPPageSep{065.png}{53}%
+many as $1000,000000,000000$---a thousand million
+of millions per second. As large as this number is,
+and as improbable as it would seem to be, there is indubitable
+evidence that the atoms of matter do actually
+make such a number of vibrations per second.
+\index{Vibrations per second}%
+\Pagelabel{53}%
+
+If one knows the rate at which vibrations are propagated
+in a medium and the wave length, one can readily
+determine the number of vibrations the body is making
+that sets up the waves. Thus, if the velocity of sound
+in the air be $1100$~feet per second, and the length of
+one wave be $1$~foot, then the body must be making
+$\dfrac{1100}{1}=1100$ vibrations per second: that is, the velocity
+divided by the wave length will give the number of
+vibrations.
+
+The velocity of light is known to be $186000$ miles
+per second; the wave lengths of light are also known with
+great precision, and are all only small fractions of an
+inch. If they were only one inch long, their number
+would be the number of inches there are in $186000$
+miles, or $12 × 5,280 × 186000 = 11784,960000$ per
+second. In reality they are only one forty-thousandth
+or the one fifty-thousandth of that.
+\[
+11784,960000 × 50000 = 589,248000,000000,
+\]
+nearly six hundred millions of millions per second. No
+one can pretend to comprehend such a number; but in
+proportion as he understands the process and the data
+by which such a result is reached, will he have an abiding
+confidence that it is legitimate and that it expresses
+the actual truth.
+\DPPageSep{066.png}{54}%
+
+Sometimes it is convenient to know the actual space
+that is moved over by a vibrating body in terms
+of free-path or translatory motion, that is, how far
+would the body move in the same time if, instead of
+vibrating, it went on in a straight line. If the prong
+of a tuning-fork moves through the one-hundredth of
+an inch each swing, and vibrates one hundred times in
+a second, obviously its rate of motion measured that
+way would be only one inch, which would be a relatively
+slow motion when compared with many others.
+If the same computation be applied to atoms, however,
+whose rate of vibration is so enormously high, it leads
+to some very respectable translational velocities. Thus,
+\index{Velocities}%
+suppose the amplitude of vibration of an atom of hydrogen
+be as great as one-half its diameter, that is, one
+hundred-millionth of an inch, if it vibrates five hundred
+millions of millions of times per second, the actual
+space moved through will be
+\[
+\frac{500,000000,000000}{100,000000}
+ = 5,000000 \text{ inches} = 80 \text{ miles,}
+\]
+which is more than four times that of the earth in
+its orbit. It does not appear probable, however, that
+the amplitude of motion is anywhere near as much
+as that assumed, at any rate for ordinary temperatures;
+but if it be only the one-hundredth of that amplitude
+the velocity exceeds that which can artificially be given
+to any visible object, as it will then be nearly a mile a
+second.
+
+Rotary speeds have wide ranges. The earth takes
+twenty-four hours to make one revolution; the moon
+about twenty-eight days, and the sun twenty-six, and
+\DPPageSep{067.png}{55}%
+\index{Earth, diameter of}%
+some others of the planets perhaps much longer than
+that. Some astronomers have concluded from their
+observations of the planets Venus and Mercury, that
+\index{Mercury}%
+\index{Venus}%
+their axial rotation corresponds with their time of revolution
+about the sun, being $224$~days for Venus, and $88$
+for Mercury. Tops have been made to spin eight hundred
+or a thousand times per second; and if molecules
+ever rotate their rate has not been measured. The
+velocity of rotation, when measured as a translation,
+must evidently depend upon the diameter of the body
+rotating. The diameter of the earth being nearly eight
+thousand miles, a point on the equator moves twenty-five
+thousand miles in twenty-four hours---something
+over a thousand miles an hour, or about seventeen miles
+a minute. A driving-wheel of a locomotive that is six
+feet in diameter will advance nearly nineteen feet every
+revolution. To have a speed of a mile a minute, which
+is $88$~feet per second, it must turn round $\dfrac{88}{19}=4.6$~times
+per second\DPtypo{}{.} A disk $4$~inches in diameter, spinning $800$
+revolutions per second, which was the speed given by
+Foucault to one of his gyroscopes, would advance, if
+allowed to roll, with the speed of $837$~feet per second---nearly
+ten miles a minute.
+
+There are some facts, and inferences we draw from
+them, with regard to motion and the geometry of space
+that it may be well to mention here. When we speak
+of the velocity of a body at a given time we mean by it
+that its rate is such that if continued for the whole
+interval of the unit of time, whether it be a second, or
+a minute, an hour, or any other, the body will move
+\DPPageSep{068.png}{56}%
+\index{Sun, its distance}%
+through the whole specified distance. A body will not
+need to go a mile in a minute in order to have a velocity
+of a mile a minute. It may not move ten feet, yet
+may have that or any higher velocity. This is obvious
+enough of course. Every one trusts arithmetical processes
+to lead him to correct results in velocities and
+\index{Velocities}%
+time and all such familiar matters. One will say
+frequently, ``It is six hours to New York'' instead of,
+``It is two hundred miles to New York,'' and will not
+be misunderstood. Some persons have computed how
+long a time it would take to reach the sun if they were
+to take an express-train running at the rate of fifty
+miles an hour, without stopping for food or fuel; and
+they find it comes out nearly two hundred years,---a
+time of transit equivalent to five generations of men.
+In like manner, presuming one knows the distance to
+any remote point in space, the time required to get
+there at a given velocity one would call a simple problem
+in arithmetic, and it is. But there is an assumption
+one has to make which is rarely considered: that is,
+the properties of space and of time are the same everywhere,
+and that the geometry of the space in which we
+\index{Geometry}%
+live is a geometry that holds everywhere and always:
+that its propositions are absolutely and irrefragably true
+always and everywhere. We assume, because we find
+them practically true on a small scale, that they are
+equally true on the largest scale.
+
+Within the past fifty years the great geometers have
+made some very wonderful discoveries---one might say,
+astounding discoveries; for they tell us that we do not
+know that the sum of the interior angles of a plain
+\DPPageSep{069.png}{57}%
+triangle is equal to a hundred and eighty degrees,
+that we do not know it within ten degrees if the
+triangle be a very large one, such as is formed by
+the spaces between remote stars and the sun; furthermore,
+we are assured that, for all we know, and therefore
+for all we can reason from, space itself may be
+\Pagelabel{57}%
+curved so that if one were to start in what we call a
+straight line, in any direction, and travel in it on and on
+he would find himself after a long time coming to his
+starting-point from the opposite direction; that what
+one would see if his sight were prolonged in any direction
+would be the back of his own head much magnified.
+Methods have been proposed for discovering if it be
+true or not. Some folks have called this nonsense, and
+have used descriptive adjectives to express their contempt
+for it; but none of those who have spoken thus
+of the new geometry are themselves mathematicians,
+\index{Geometry}%
+and one is therefore left with the fair inference that
+they did not so well know of what they condemned as
+did the mathematicians who reached the conclusion.\footnote
+ {See \hyperref[page:400]{Appendix}.}
+
+Now, we all of us trust such mathematical processes
+as we can ourselves handle, even when they lead us to
+magnitudes and distances too great for comprehension.
+All that one needs to know is, that the process is a
+legitimate one and is correctly worked out. This new
+geometry I have alluded to has been worked at by the
+best mathematicians of all the civilized nations, and
+they agree in the conclusions. They certainly would
+not do so if there were the slightest apparent reason
+for rejecting them; for national jealousies are too
+\DPPageSep{070.png}{58}%
+strong, and a sense of the value of truth too great, to
+allow any such notions to gain currency anywhere if
+there were any possibilities of breaking them down.
+
+If the space we live in and the geometric relations
+\index{Space}%
+are only practically true upon a small scale; if we may
+have a kind of space of four or more dimensions, whether
+we now can conceive of it or not, then should one understand
+that spaces and distances and velocities and all
+computations formed upon them, though practically
+true, for all of our experience must not be pushed up
+into statements that shall embrace all things in the
+heavens as well as on the earth. Perhaps even the
+visible universe is not to be measured by our span,
+much less things invisible in it and beyond it.
+%\DPPageSep{071.png}{59}%
+
+
+\Chapter{IV}{Energy}{59}
+
+\First{Whenever} a body of matter having any motion
+strikes another body, it always imparts some of its
+motion to it, and the second body moves. The ability
+one body has to move another one is sometimes called
+its energy, and the amount of energy received is proportional
+to the amount of similar energy the first body
+possesses. A body at rest can impart no motion to
+another one, so it appears that the energy a body has
+depends upon its own amount of motion. Neither can
+a body impart to another one more motion than it possesses
+itself, and rarely or never can it do so much as
+that. Inasmuch as every kind of a phenomenon is the
+\index{Phenomena, nature of}%
+result of the transfer of some kind of motion from one
+body to another, one may rightly infer that to understand
+phenomena and their relations, one must need to
+know, not only the kinds of motion that are transferred,
+but must also know their quantitative relations, and he
+must therefore have some units and standards for comparison.
+This requires some measure for the amount
+of matter involved, also some measure for the motion
+it has. For the former it is customary to employ a
+weight. A certain mass of matter called a pound is
+adopted in England and America. Exact duplicates of
+\DPPageSep{072.png}{60}%
+\index{Falling bodies}%
+\index{Falling bodies, energy of}%
+\index{Weights, standards of}%
+\index{Work, standard of}%
+its standard weights are made and preserved by each
+nation; so as weights become worn by usage, they
+may be exactly replaced. Any unit space may be
+adopted, as the foot, which is common. If a pound
+has been raised a foot, a certain amount of work has
+been done, which is called a \emph{foot-pound}, and it is important
+\index{Foot-pound}%
+to keep in mind just what it signifies. If ten
+pounds be raised one foot, or if one pound be raised
+ten feet, the same amount of work---ten foot-pounds---has
+been done; and with this as a starting-point, it
+will be easy to see how energy may be measured, for
+the measure of it will be the amount of work, measured
+in foot-pounds, it can do. It is found by experiment
+that if a body be left free to fall in the air, it will fall
+sixteen feet in a second, and its velocity at the end of
+the second will be thirty-two feet. If a very elastic
+ball weighing a pound should fall thus in the air upon
+an elastic pavement, it would rebound nearly to the
+height of sixteen feet. If it does not quite reach that
+height, it is because the air retards it somewhat, and
+some of its motion has been imparted to the pavement
+upon which it falls. Adding those losses to the height
+it did rise, and it would make the sixteen feet. Now, to
+raise a pound sixteen feet required sixteen foot-pounds
+of work; there must therefore have been sixteen foot-pounds
+of energy at the instant of impact. Its velocity
+was thirty-two feet per second. Hence a body weighing
+one pound, having a velocity of thirty-two feet in a
+second, is capable of doing sixteen foot-pounds of work.
+It is found also that if the same body falls for two
+seconds, it will fall sixty-four feet, and its velocity at
+\DPPageSep{073.png}{61}%
+the end of the second second will be sixty-four feet,---twice
+as great as it was for the fall of one second; but
+the pound weight in this case will rise under similar
+\index{Weight}%
+conditions to the height of sixty-four feet, which is four
+times higher than for thirty-two feet per second; so it
+is seen that in this case, when the velocity is doubled,
+the power of doing work, measured in foot-pounds, has
+been increased four times, and this is generally expressed
+by saying that the energy of a body is proportional
+to the square of its velocity. The particular
+direction in which a body moves has not been found to
+make any difference in this regard, so the statement is
+a general one. If a mass weighing two pounds were
+dropped, as in the first instance, it would rise no higher
+than if it weighed but one; but two pounds raised sixteen
+feet would give thirty-two foot-pounds, so the
+work would be proportional to the weight as well as to
+the square of the velocity.
+
+The amount of matter there is in, say, a pound weight
+would be just the same in one place as in another; but
+the attraction of the earth upon it depends upon where
+it is. At the surface, where we measure it, it has a
+certain value; but at the centre of the earth it would
+weigh nothing. The farther it were removed from
+the surface of the earth upwards, the less would its
+weight be. At the height of a thousand miles it would
+be but four-fifths of a pound; at a million miles it
+would be but sixteen-millionths of a pound, or only
+about the tenth of a grain.
+
+For that reason it has become necessary to find
+some measure for matter that shall be independent of
+\DPPageSep{074.png}{62}%
+\index{Foot-pound}%
+\index{Work, measure of}%
+position, and this has been found by dividing the weight
+of the body at a given place by the value of gravity at
+that place, and calling the quotient the \emph{mass}; so if $w$~represents
+the weight of a body at a given place, and
+$g$~the value of gravity at the same place, that is, the
+velocity that gravity will give to a body in one second
+if left free to fall, then $\dfrac{w}{g} = m$, the mass. The distance
+in feet that a body will fall in a second is equal
+to the square of the velocity divided by twice the value
+of gravity, or~$d$, the distance,~$= \dfrac{v^2}{2g}$; and as the weight
+equals~$mg$, the product of the two is $mg × \dfrac{v^2}{2g} = \dfrac{mv^2}{2}$,
+one-half the product of the mass into the square of the
+velocity will give the energy of a body. But it is
+generally more convenient to use the weight of the
+body instead of its mass. As $m = \dfrac{w}{g}$, let it be substituted
+for~$m$ in the expression of energy, and we shall
+have $\dfrac{wv^2}{2g} = pd$ (pressure in pounds into distance in
+feet), or foot-pounds, a very convenient expression to
+keep in mind if one has any problems in motion and
+energy for solution.
+
+An example will make plain the utility of this. A
+body weighing ten pounds is moving with the velocity
+of one hundred feet in a second; how much energy has it?
+$\dfrac{wv^2}{2g} = \dfrac{10 × 100^2}{64} = 1562~\text{foot-pounds}$; that is, it has
+energy enough to raise $1562$~pounds a foot high, or ten
+pounds $156.2$~feet high.
+\DPPageSep{075.png}{63}%
+
+This is applicable to all bodies, big and little, whose
+weight and velocity of translation are given.
+
+When a person who weighs one hundred and fifty
+pounds climbs a flight of stairs---say, to the height of
+ten feet---he has done $150 × 10 = 1500$ foot-pounds of
+work. Whether he has gone up fast or slow makes no
+difference in the amount of work done; it will only
+make a difference in the \emph{rate} of doing work. Now, a
+horse-power is a rate of work, and is equal to $550$~foot-pounds
+a second; and hence if the above individual
+climbs the stairs at the rate of four feet a second, he
+will be doing $4 × 150 = 600$ foot-pounds per second,
+which is over a horse-power, and indicates the
+probability that he would not climb so fast. If any
+one thinks he can do it, it will be worth his while to
+try it.
+
+Work can be measured on a horizontal as well as a
+vertical plane. Suppose the horses on a horse-car pull
+two hundred pounds, as indicated by a dynamometer,
+and the car is moved five feet in a second: the pull
+into the distance measures the work done; that is,
+$pd = 200 × 5 = 1000$ foot-pounds, a little less than
+two-horse power. These illustrations are given because
+not every one has clear enough ideas concerning the
+meaning of energy and work, much less the ability to
+apply them to examples that may often come up.
+When one sees the long trail of a meteor in the sky,
+and remembers that its velocity may be as much as
+twenty or more miles per second, he will now see that
+it may have a good deal of energy, though its weight be
+but a few grains.
+\DPPageSep{076.png}{64}%
+\index{Energy of translation}%
+\index{Meteors}%
+\index{Work, measure of}%
+
+The energy of a pound moving twenty miles a second
+would equal
+\[
+\frac{1 × (20 × 5280)^2}{64} = 174,240000 \text{ foot-pounds.}
+\]
+A grain is one seven-thousandth of a pound, and its
+energy would therefore be but the one seven-thousandth
+of that quantity. $\dfrac{174,240000}{7000} = 24891$, which is the
+number of foot-pounds of work a meteor weighing one
+grain, at that velocity, may have: enough to raise a
+ton twelve feet high.
+
+As a matter of fact, the great friction it is subject to
+in its path through the air heats it shortly to incandescence,
+and it is presently dissipated. If it were not for
+the air, therefore, even if we could subsist without it,
+mankind would be in constant danger from the flying
+missiles; for though they would weigh but a little,
+their velocity would enable them to do destructive
+work upon everything they struck. As there are some
+millions that come into the atmosphere every day, no
+one could be safe from them in any place.
+
+The energy of a workingman is measured in the
+same way; namely, by the amount of work in foot-pounds
+he can do.
+
+One of the most direct ways of knowing this for an
+individual is to ascertain the amount of earth or stones
+he can load into a cart, or the bricks he can carry up a
+ladder to the mason. Suppose he throws fifteen shovelfuls
+per minute, each one holding ten pounds, and each
+one is raised four feet high: then in a minute he has done
+\DPPageSep{077.png}{65}%
+\index{Goose, work in flying}%
+$15 × 10 × 4 = 600$ foot-pounds of work, or $10$~per second.
+This is rather a small quantity, only the one fifty-fifth of
+what a horse-power would do, and most men have been
+found able to do forty or fifty foot-pounds per second;
+still, there is a great difference in individuals in their
+working ability. Climbing, in general, is hard work
+because it is continuous lifting of one's self. One who
+weighs one hundred and fifty pounds, and climbs one
+hundred feet, has done $15000$ foot-pounds of work; and
+if he has done it in a minute, he has spent nearly half a
+horse-power, which is $33000$ foot-pounds a minute.
+
+Once more: a bird in flying has to do work; and one
+may see how much is demanded of such birds as geese,
+that make long voyages through the air in the fall and
+spring,---sometimes for twelve hours or more continuously.
+As work is measured by pressure into distance,
+one may apply it thus. Geese are known to fly at the
+rate of thirty miles per hour, which is forty-four feet per
+second. In flying, of course, there has to be a push
+forward by means of their wings, not only to advance,
+but to maintain their elevation. Supposing that a large
+bird flying at this rate should have to exert a push of
+one pound continually: it would be expending then forty-four
+foot-pounds per second, nearly one-twelfth of a horsepower;
+and to maintain such a rate for twelve hours
+would imply that it had a supply of energy to start with
+of $44 × 60 × 60 × 12 = 1,900800$ foot-pounds for one
+day's expenditure. This does not seem at all probable,
+and one may therefore infer that the pressure exerted
+when going at that rate is much less. If the pressure
+were but one ounce instead of a pound, the rate of work
+\DPPageSep{078.png}{66}%
+\index{Energy of vibration}%
+would be $\dfrac{44}{16} = 2.75$ foot-pounds per second, which is
+much more likely; but this supposes the bird to have a
+supply of energy of $\dfrac{1,900800}{2.75} = 700000$ foot-pounds.
+
+In the chapter on ``\hyperref[chap:chemism]{Chemism},'' the source of the
+energy of animals will be more particularly treated.
+
+So far the energy involved in translatory or free-path---or,
+as it is more often called, mechanical---energy
+has been considered; but vibratory motions of matter involve
+energy also, and the same expression is applicable
+as in the first case,~$\dfrac{wv^2}{2g}$. Here the value of the~$v$,
+or the velocity, has to be determined by analyzing the
+motion itself. This is not simply the number of times
+the body vibrates, but also the extent of each individual
+vibration,---that is to say, the amplitude of vibration,---and
+the product of these two factors will give the
+value of~$v$ needed. So if $n$~be the number of times the
+body vibrates a second, and $a$~be the amplitude of the individual
+vibrations, the true velocity will be represented
+by~$an$, and then the expression for the energy will be
+\[
+\dfrac{wa^2 n^2}{2g}.
+\]
+For most bodies of visible magnitude the amplitude of
+vibration is so small a quantity that for frequencies of
+only a few hundred per second, the velocity, measured
+as a translation, is small, and therefore the energy is
+small, and there are few cases where it is very important
+to take it into account.
+
+Suppose a vibrating body has an amplitude of the
+\DPPageSep{079.png}{67}%
+one-hundredth of an inch, and vibrates a hundred times
+in a second: the total distance moved through in a
+second would be but an inch, which would be the value
+of~$v$, so the amount of energy it had would depend
+more largely upon the weight of the body. On the
+other hand, if a body is so small that its rate of vibration
+is exceedingly high, as was shown in the case of
+atoms on \Pageref{page}{53}, there might be a relatively large
+amount of energy involved. In the case refered\DPnote{** [sic]} to, a
+velocity of eighty miles a second was computed, on
+\Pagelabel{67}%
+the supposition that the amplitude of vibration was
+equal to one-half the diameter of the atom; and what
+amount of energy is possessed by a body weighing one
+grain was computed. The amount in an atom with
+that vibratory rate and amplitude would be calculated
+by dividing the amount in the grain by the number of
+atoms in a grain. Numerically it is a very, very small
+quantity, and only becomes appreciable to any of our
+senses when vast numbers of atoms act conjointly.
+
+There are some cases where energy is apparently
+expended when there is no apparent motion, as is the
+case when a man holds up a weight. If the weight be
+\index{Muscular work}%
+\index{Work, muscular}%
+a heavy one, exhaustion will be the result as much as if
+energy was spent in any other way. This muscular
+work is called physiological work, and for a long time
+it was not understood. It is now known, however, that
+when a muscle is put in a state of tension, it is in longitudinal
+vibration a great many times a second. This
+may be perceived by putting the end of a finger into
+the ear, pressing but gently, at the same time squeezing
+with the rest of the hand as if grasping something
+\DPPageSep{080.png}{68}%
+\index{Energy of rotation}%
+tightly; a low sound will be heard, made by perhaps
+no more than thirty or forty vibrations per second.
+The muscles in a state of tension produce this. When
+one holds up a weight---say, a pail of water---the muscles
+involved yield and contract rapidly, so the weight
+is really raised in a vibratory way a short distance, but
+a great many times in a second; and the heavier the
+weight, the more the work done, and this too is measured
+in the same way as other more visible kinds.
+There is good reason for believing that a book resting
+upon a table is supported by the vibratory motions
+going on among the particles of the table, and therefore
+energy is expended to do it, and that this is supplied
+by the heat present in the body; that is, the
+temperature of the table is a little different from what
+it would be if it did not have any weight to support.
+
+Walking involves the expenditure of energy in the
+same way. Each step requires the whole body to be
+raised somewhat. Suppose it be only an inch. A
+person weighing $150$~pounds would, for each step, do
+$\dfrac{150}{12}$ foot-pounds~$= 12\frac{1}{2}$. If he takes two steps per
+second, then each minute he does $2 × 12\frac{1}{2} × 60 = 1500$
+foot-pounds of work. Thus one can see how physiological
+processes are measurable in terms of mechanical
+units.
+
+The energy of a rotating body is more complicated
+than translational energy, because a part of the body is
+at rest,---the axis; and the velocity of movement at
+any point away from that is proportional to its distance
+from it. In the case of the balance-wheels of steam
+\DPPageSep{081.png}{69}%
+engines, where the most of the weight of the wheel is
+in the rim, the velocity of the latter would be equal to
+its circumference multiplied by the number of turns
+per second or per minute. Thus if a fly-wheel, having
+nearly the whole of its weight in the rim, weighs, say, a
+ton ($2000$~lbs.), is six feet in diameter, and rotates four
+times a second, its velocity will be $75.4$~feet per second,
+and its energy will be $\dfrac{wv^2}{2g} = \dfrac{2000 × 75.4^2}{64} = 177661$
+foot-pounds, an amount of energy which is stored up,
+\Pagelabel{69}%
+and may be drawn upon to prevent fluctuations in
+speed to which engines in workshops are liable.
+
+If a body having rectilinear motion be left to itself
+in the air, it will speedily be brought to rest, for gravity
+will bring it to the earth whether it be moving this way
+or that. The air, too, will retard its motion, and would
+ultimately bring it to rest if nothing else did, as it
+would either of the other kinds of motion. If, however,
+one could contrive to give to a body above the atmosphere
+a sufficient velocity in a tangential direction, the
+body would become a satellite, and revolve round the
+\index{Satellite}%
+earth. The curvature of the earth is about eight
+\index{Earth, curvature}%
+inches to the mile, and such a body would then need to
+move a mile in a horizontal direction in the same time
+it falls eight inches in order that it should continue to
+go about the earth. As it takes about two-tenths of a
+second to fall this distance, its velocity would need to be
+five miles a second to prevent it from falling to the
+earth; this velocity would carry it quite round the earth
+in a little less than an hour and a half.
+
+Thus it is seen that, in order that matter should
+\DPPageSep{082.png}{70}%
+\index{Energy, factors of}%
+\index{Motion, laws of}%
+possess energy, it must have motion of some kind;
+indeed, that energy has two factors, mass and motion.
+When either of these is zero, there is no energy. This
+is a consideration of great importance both in a scientific
+sense and a philosophical one. One may often
+hear it said and read it in carefully written books that
+matter and energy are the two realities or physical
+things in the universe, and energy is spoken of as if it
+were an entity, or something that might exist though
+there were no substance to move. If energy be a
+product, and motion be one of the factors, then in the
+absence of this there is no energy. This perhaps will
+be seen still clearer after considering what are called
+the laws of motion, which were first formulated by
+Newton, and which, in conjunction with the law of
+gravitation, were the fundamental principles that
+enabled him to produce the ``Principia,'' which is what
+\index{Principia}%
+to-day we would call a treatise on mechanics.
+
+Of course, the science of mechanics is applicable to
+motions of matter of any magnitude and in any place;
+and Newton chose to follow out his newly discovered
+principles into astronomy to the largest extent, and it
+remained for later generations to employ the same principles
+in other directions, largely molecular and atomic.
+
+The first law of motion is, that whether a body be in
+a state of rest or of motion, it will remain in that state
+of rest or motion until compelled by the action of some
+other body upon it to change its state. This is sometimes
+expressed by saying that all matter has \emph{inertia},
+\index{Inertia}%
+\Pagelabel{70}%
+or an inability to move or change its direction or velocity
+if it has motion. This appears to be experimentally
+\DPPageSep{083.png}{71}%
+\index{Explosion products}%
+true of all bodies whose magnitude and state
+we can see. But it may very well be doubted if the
+ordinary conception of the inertness of matter be true.
+Many of the facts of chemistry indicate that matter in
+its atomic form is not altogether so helpless as it has
+been supposed to be. A stone may lie in the road for
+an indefinite time and no one would suspect it possessed
+any energy to do anything, and so of any other kind of
+matter. Here is a piece of charcoal. Has it inertness in
+any extreme sense of that word? Here is some sulphur
+and some nitrate of potash; they, too, will lie as
+quiescent as the coal and as long. Pulverize them and
+mix them together, and we have powder the energy of
+which would wreck a building. The products of the
+explosion are gaseous mostly, and the carbon, the sulphur,
+and the nitrate of potash have vanished as such,
+and have entered suddenly into new combinations;
+they have developed also a large amount of heat, while
+at the beginning their temperature was that of other
+bodies around them. This source of energy must have
+been resident in the atoms; and if it is perceived that
+for a body to have energy it is necessary for it to have
+motion of some sort, it will be apparent that the
+material itself must have possessed a large amount of
+motion, even when it appeared to be at rest. If one
+thinks that the law of inertia might still apply to atoms,
+and that they cannot individually move except as they
+are acted upon by other atoms, and even then only as
+much as by the measure of the motion thus imparted,
+he had better figure out to himself the energy of such
+explosions per molecule, and see if anything initially
+done will account for it.
+\DPPageSep{084.png}{72}%
+\index{Motion, antecedent of}%
+\index{Top, sleep of}%
+\index{Vortex rings, properties of}%
+
+When the mechanism of a clock is running, the
+motion may be traced to a falling weight, and the work
+done is measured by the product of the weights into
+the distance it falls as the clock runs down; but in
+the case of the powder, though the amount of energy
+developed by the explosion is definite, it is not measured
+by the work done in pulverizing and mixing and igniting
+it. The case is much more nearly analogous to
+that of a sleeping man. While asleep he would neither
+move nor stop moving unless some other agency acted
+upon him, any more than would a stone or other mass
+of matter; and in that sense he would be inert, yet no
+one would think of calling a sleeping man inert, except
+in a very loose sense.
+
+Furthermore, there is an experimental analogy that
+may help one to see a little deeper into this. Every
+one knows what is meant by the ``sleep'' of a spinning
+top. It appears to be absolutely at rest, and may not
+even hum; but touch it, and the effect upon it will be
+out of all proportion to the slightness of the touch.
+
+It has been observed as a property of vortex rings that
+they have a tendency to move forward in the direction
+of their axes, and when prevented from going forward
+they press upon the body that arrests them. If they
+be brought to rest, and then the barrier be removed,
+\emph{they, of their own accord}, start on in the same direction
+as if pushed from behind. Such a body cannot be
+said to be inert without modifying the common meaning
+of the word.
+
+This is not alluded to here as proving anything; but
+inasmuch as the vortex-ring theory of matter has a good
+\DPPageSep{085.png}{73}%
+\index{Motion, laws of}%
+probability in its favor, this property I have mentioned
+helps one to understand how the atoms might be other
+than inert, and yet large bodies of them together exhibit
+that property with the rigorousness our observations
+upon such bodies demonstrate. Suppose each
+atom had the ability to move forward of its own impulse
+when not acted on by any other atom. If there
+were a million atoms joined together, no matter how,
+provided they were promiscuously faced, they would
+mutually neutralize each other's ability to move in any
+direction, and the resultant of the whole would be that
+passivity which we call inertness.
+
+We may by and by see that there may be still other
+good reasons for thinking matter not to be so passive
+as it has been often assumed to be.
+
+The second law of motion is, when two or more
+bodies act upon a third body, the effect of each is the
+same as if it alone acted, and the combined effect is
+called the resultant; and the third law is, that action
+and reaction are always equal and opposite in direction.
+This third condition of action, or the relation of
+motions in two bodies, is of a high degree of philosophical
+importance, perhaps not more so than the others,
+but of so much that it is worth while to attend to it
+more particularly than to the second law. If a rope be
+tied to the wall and one pulls upon it so as to make it
+taut, the wall pulls back in the opposite direction as
+much as the arm pulls forward. A spring-balance
+attached to the wall would indicate the strength of the
+pull, the pull of the arm representing the action, and
+measured by the muscular vibration, as already described,
+\DPPageSep{086.png}{74}%
+and the pull of the wall representing the
+reaction, and equal to the action in quantity and maintained
+by molecular vibration. Imagine the action of
+the arm to be steadily increasing in quantity: the
+reaction of the wall would correspondingly increase
+until the molecular tension could no longer be increased,
+and either the rope would break, the hook be pulled out
+from the wall, or the wall itself be broken away; but in
+no case could the action exceed the reaction or \textit{vice
+versa}. Now, if the amount of matter in the arm were a
+constant quantity, as well as that of the rope, the hook,
+and the wall, then it would follow that all the physical
+changes noted in either the one or the other, so far as
+energy is concerned, must be due to the motions involved
+on either side. And if action and reaction be
+equal, and the quantity of matter be uniform, then the
+amount of motion involved must be equal on the two
+sides. If a body in motion strikes another body, and
+the second one is set in motion, the amount of motion in
+the two will be just equal to the amount of motion
+in the first. The amount of motion gained by one
+body is just equal to that lost by the other, and there
+has been simply an exchange of motions, one having
+gained, the other lost; the one that gained being the
+one that had less, and the one that lost having had
+more, than the other one. In books of physics it is
+customary to speak of the amount of motion a body has
+as its \textit{momentum}; and it may be measured by multiplying
+\index{Momentum}%
+the mass of the body by its velocity, and oftentimes
+one may read that in the physical exchanges that are
+all the time happening in matter the momentum is
+\DPPageSep{087.png}{75}%
+conserved; that is to say, is neither increased nor
+diminished. Seeing, therefore, that the amount of
+matter is a constant quantity, and the momentum a
+constant quantity, it follows that the amount of motion
+is constant. Motion is conserved as well as matter. If
+the amount of matter in the universe be constant, then,
+according to this statement, the amount of motion must
+be constant, and the amount of energy constant also.
+
+It is generally agreed that this statement concerning
+energy is true, and one hears often about the law of
+the conservation of energy. It seems to be less clearly
+recognized that the third law of motion implies the conservation
+of motion, provided matter is itself a constant
+quantity. But there is another condition of things that
+is as uniform as any other condition of things in
+nature that has not been recognized as a law, and yet it
+deserves to be perhaps as much or more than most
+others, since, in our experience, it is never known to
+vary; it is this: Wherever there is an interchange of
+motions between two bodies, the transfer is always
+from the one having more to the one having less. As
+exchange of motions implies transfer of energy, it follows
+that all transfers of energy of any given kind are
+from bodies having more to those having less.
+
+Cause and effect are always determined by such a
+\index{Cause and effect}%
+disposition of things, though not every one has apparently
+seen that questions involving what they please
+to call causes and effects presume a kind of antecedent
+and consequent that always work both ways at
+the same time, for there is no such thing as an isolated
+phenomenon. If everything takes place so and so
+\DPPageSep{088.png}{76}%
+because there is an exchange of motion going on,
+then this thing that now moves faster than it did has
+been acted upon by a body that had more motion in
+this direction than the former one had, and it has
+imparted some of its motion at the expense of its own
+energy. If one inquires what caused the increased
+velocity to this body, it may be said it was caused by
+the impact with another body. In like manner one
+may inquire what caused the slowing-up motions of the
+second body, and the answer still must be, the same
+impact with the first body. So, for every phenomenon
+there is a corresponding and complementary phenomenon,
+which it is just as appropriate to consider as a
+cause as it is the first, and either element is just as
+much a cause as the other, and in each and every case
+all there is involved are exchanges in the amount and
+kinds of motion in matter.
+
+There remains now the consideration of a topic
+which those who have studied physical subjects only a
+little must be more or less familiar with. The term
+``potential energy'' has been much employed within the
+last twenty years to express a certain condition of matter
+that renders it a source of energy when no motion
+is supposed to be involved: thus, where a weight is
+raised, like that of a clock, or of a stone raised to the
+roof of a house. By falling, either of them can be
+made to do work; but so long as they remain raised
+and are apparently quiescent, their stock of energy is
+measured by their weight into their height, i.e., foot-pounds;
+and this is said to be \textit{potential energy}. Examples
+of this sort are numerous. The wound-up spring
+\DPPageSep{089.png}{77}%
+\index{Energy, factors of}%
+of a clock or watch, a bent bow, compressed air or
+steam, powder, nitro-glycerine, and the like explosives,
+coal, wood, and other kinds of fuel, are all varieties of
+so-called potential energy. Let it be remembered that
+we have in natural phenomena matter and ether and
+space and time and motion. If matter and ether be
+substances, then the product of one into the other
+would signify nothing; it would be physical nonsense.
+So likewise would be the product of matter into space
+or time; and yet if matter is to be possessed of energy,
+and motion is \emph{not} one of the factors, then either space
+or time must be, and no one can imagine how energy
+can in any way depend upon time as a factor, and there
+is no degree of probability that it is or can be so; and
+hence, though we had no hint of how it might be, one
+would need to avow his belief that in some way motion
+was involved in every case where physical energy was
+involved, for in any case where it had been hitherto
+possible to trace it, it had been found to be present as
+a factor in precisely the same relations as in all other
+known cases, and hence he would avow a disbelief in
+the existence of potential energy in any other than a
+loose sense for a condition where the character of the
+motion involved was obscure. This would imply that
+all energy is kinetic, whether the character of the
+motion was determined or not. This view is now held
+by those who have taken the pains to think out the
+necessary relations that are involved in this subject.
+
+In the last edition of the ``Encyclopædia Britannica,''
+Professor Tait, who contributed the article on ``Mechanics,''
+says, ``Now, it is impossible to conceive of a truly
+\DPPageSep{090.png}{78}%
+\index{Molecular fatigue}%
+dormant form of energy whose magnitude should depend
+in any way on the unit of time; and we are therefore
+forced to the conclusion that potential energy, like
+kinetic energy, depends in some unimagined way upon
+motion;'' also, ``The conclusion which appears inevitable
+is that whatever matter may be, the other reality
+in the physical universe which is never found unassociated
+with matter depends in all its widely varied forms
+upon motion of matter;'' and in another place, ``Potential
+energy must in some way depend upon motion.''
+
+It was pointed out (on p.~67) that what was called
+physiological work is now known to depend upon
+the vibratory state of muscles in a state of tension.
+Before that explanation was known, one might have
+called such, potential energy, if it had not been for the
+sense of fatigue felt by one who was doing such physiological
+work that forbade him to assume that actual
+energy was not employed to maintain such a stress;
+and when it becomes evident, as it has, that one cannot
+press upon a table, or pull upon a rope, or bring about
+in any way a push or a strain upon matter, without
+varying the temperature of the body, it is no longer
+difficult to understand that all changes of that sort
+upon matter result in atomic and molecular stresses,
+for they are placed in abnormal positions as well as
+stretched muscles, and their energy is spent in a similar
+manner. There is a curious phenomenon exhibited
+by all bodies that are made to do atomic and molecular
+work for a considerable time. They become exhausted,
+like living things, and require rest to recover their
+properties. Thus, a tuning-fork, if kept artificially
+\DPPageSep{091.png}{79}%
+\index{Energy in the ether}%
+vibrating for some time, will stop almost instantly
+when the driving force is stopped, though at the outset
+it would continue to vibrate for a minute or more when
+left to itself. This is caused by what is called the
+fatigue of elasticity: the body loses some degree of its
+elasticity, and requires time to recover it. I have called
+the phenomenon curious. Perhaps it is no more so
+than any other phenomenon manifested by matter; but
+it is so similar to what is so characteristic of living
+things, that it almost excites one's sympathy. One
+can have compassion for an overworked and exhausted
+horse, but an overworked tuning-fork! The expression
+would seem to be wholly inapplicable, but the fact is as
+stated. The only difference between the cases is, one
+has nerves, and becomes conscious of the exhaustion,
+the other not.
+
+So far, both motion and energy have been considered
+as related to matter, and matter as defined in the first
+chapter, as distinguished from the ether, though immersed
+in it, and can by no means be isolated from it;
+but energy exists in the ether as well, as we are assured
+by many phenomena. That light requires about eight
+minutes to come to us from the sun has been proved in
+numerous ways. When it gets to the earth it is found
+to be able to impart energy to the matter it falls upon:
+it may heat it and affect it in other ways that are
+measurable, so energy gets to us from the sun, and is
+eight minutes in transit in the ether. If we do not
+call ether matter, and it has been shown that there are
+good reasons for not doing so, then it follows that
+energy exists outside of matter, and it is a proper line
+\DPPageSep{092.png}{80}%
+\index{Light, energy of}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+of inquiry to learn what shape the energy exists in,
+and what mechanical conceptions are appropriate when
+thinking about it. In matter one may isolate motions
+of various sorts. A mass of matter, say, like a baseball,
+may have translatory motion: it may vibrate or it
+may spin. In each case one may contemplate the kind
+of motion, and compute the energy involved in the
+movement, and this is true for atoms as well as larger
+masses; but when the substance is not made up of
+discrete parts, but is absolutely homogeneous with no
+interstices, and apparently incapable of changing either
+its position or its form, as there is good reason for
+thinking to be the case with the ether, it becomes
+\index{Ether}%
+much more difficult to picture to one's self just what is
+happening when motion of any sort is involved. As
+has already been said, we know that light consists of
+waves, measurable quantities, and we know how much
+energy reaches the earth from the sun and falls upon a
+square mile or square foot. There have been several
+estimates of this quantity, and it is found to be equal to
+about one hundred and thirty foot-pounds per second for
+each square foot section of sunshine. This signifies, of
+course, that that is the amount of energy in a column
+of ether one foot square and a hundred and eighty-six
+thousand miles long, for that is the amount that arrives
+per second. So one may calculate the amount of energy
+there is in a cubic mile of sunlight to be about twelve
+thousand foot-pounds, and also that the amount given
+out by the sun in a second is about four millions of
+foot-pounds, or nearly seven thousand horse-power for
+each square foot of the sun's surface. All of this energy
+\DPPageSep{093.png}{81}%
+\index{Electro-magnets}%
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+\index{Magnet, electro}%
+is handed over to the ether, which distributes it in all
+directions as undulatory movements which we call light.
+Such wave motions do not exhibit anything like what
+we call momentum as waves in water or air always do,
+and they are therefore in striking contrast with waves
+in matter. Moreover, being waves, having the amplitude
+at right angles to the direction of propagation,
+they must be compounded of two motions,---a rectilinear
+and a vibratory one,---and not a simple one such
+as a particle of matter may have.
+
+The ether is capable of being affected by other
+motions of matter than simply the vibratory one of
+atoms and molecules.
+
+Whenever an electro-magnet is made, it reacts upon
+the ether in such a way as to affect other matter that
+chances to be in the range of ether so affected. It
+appears as if the ether were thrown into a state of
+stress which it retains so long as the magnet retains its
+property; and this condition extends to an indefinite
+distance in all directions. If such an electro-magnet is
+made and unmade by opening and closing an electric
+current in its coils, there will be formed a set of electro-magnetic
+waves in the ether which will travel outwards
+from the magnet in a manner similar to light-waves,
+only they will have an enormous wave length. If the
+circuit be closed but once a second, the waves will be a
+hundred and eighty-six thousand miles long; for a wave
+in the ether travels in it with a velocity that depends
+solely upon the property of the ether to transmit disturbances,
+and not at all upon the source of the disturbance.
+That such an electro-magnetic wave possesses
+\DPPageSep{094.png}{82}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+energy, and can do work, one may satisfy himself by
+observing the motions produced by them upon magnetic
+needles within the affected space.
+
+In like manner an electrified body puts the ether into
+a different kind of a stress from the magnet; and when
+this is done periodically, as it may be by an induction
+coil, and in other ways, electrostatic waves are set up,
+and these too travel with the speed of light, and are
+capable of affecting matter to a great distance, thus
+showing that the ether may possess energy in an electro-static
+form, as distinguished from the electro-magnetic
+and light. There are some physicists who think these
+last two to be identical, and the reasons for their
+opinion will be given in a subsequent place.
+
+It only remains to point out that whatever the nature
+of gravity may be, there can be very little doubt that
+the ether is intimately concerned in it, as Sir Isaac
+Newton supposed was the case. But if it is, and ether
+is the agency by which one mass of matter is able to
+affect another mass, then ether is in a state of stress
+produced by the atoms of matter all the time, and
+therefore in some way gravitative energy is lodged in it.
+As the ether is so universal in its extension, one cannot
+but see that it is a storehouse of an almost unlimited
+amount of energy of many kinds; so that if every
+particle of matter were instantly annihilated, there
+would still be a universe filled with energy, though it
+might not be serviceable, because lacking the conditions
+for transformation into useful forms. This may
+be said to be one of the functions of matter---the transformation
+of the energy it gets from the ether.
+%\DPPageSep{095.png}{83}%
+
+
+\Chapter{V}{Gravitation}{83}
+
+\index{Attraction, gravitative}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+
+\First{That} all bodies will fall towards the earth if raised
+above its surface and left unsupported everybody
+knows and must always have known, for it is a fact
+thrust into everybody's notice constantly and as long
+as he lives. Also that bodies resting upon the earth
+require energy to be spent in order to raise them
+from it is equally well known. Thus all bodies act as
+if they were attracted by the earth, and the weight of
+a body is the measure of the attraction of the earth
+upon it.
+
+One not unfrequently comes across statements by
+authors implying that Newton was the discoverer of
+this attraction which is called gravitation. This is a
+mistake: not only was this idea common in Newton's
+day, but the word itself was in extensive use. Kepler
+had affirmed that the sun attracted the earth and the
+planets, and Galileo had busied himself very much
+with the study of attraction of the earth upon bodies.
+The problem that Newton had before him was not
+as to the existence of gravitative action, but what
+was its law of operation and the limits of it, if it had
+any limits. The familiar story of the fall of the apple
+leading to the great discovery is generally believed to
+\DPPageSep{096.png}{84}%
+\index{Gravitation, law of}%
+be mythical; at any rate, other facts well authenticated
+do not accord with that story. When he was twenty-three
+years old he undertook to apply the law as we
+now have it, to the moon, using the size of the earth
+and the moon's distance from it, as they were then
+best known. The result satisfied him that his surmise
+could not be the law, if the measure of the earth then
+had was accurate. This was in 1666. In 1683 he
+learned of some new measures recently made of the
+magnitude of the earth, indicating it to be larger than
+had been supposed. Then, with the new measures for
+data, he made a new computation. It was then, when
+he saw that the results were to prove his conjecture,
+and he perceived the immense importance of the discovery,
+that he handed over the unfinished work to an
+amanuensis, because he was too much agitated to complete
+it. If the discovery was made when he first
+thought of putting the idea to the test, it is strange
+that his emotional excitement should have been postponed
+for seventeen years. Evidently it was at the
+latter date when he thought he had made the discovery.
+It was the \emph{law} of gravitation that Newton discovered,
+and that it was universal. Every particle of matter
+attracts every other particle; and the strength of this
+attraction varies as the mass of each, and inversely as
+the square of the distance between them. Thus, if at
+the surface of the earth gravitation gives a weight of
+one pound to a body, at the distance of ten radii of the
+earth $= 40000$~miles, the weight would be $\dfrac{1}{10^2}$, one-hundredth
+of a pound, and at the distance of the moon,
+\DPPageSep{097.png}{85}%
+\index{Attraction depends upon distance}%
+or sixty radii of the earth, the body would weigh but
+$\dfrac{1}{60^2}$=one thirty-six hundredth of a pound, and would
+fall towards the earth in a second but $\dfrac{1}{3600}$ of the distance
+it would fall at the surface of the earth, where it
+is about sixteen feet. One thirty-six hundredth of sixteen
+feet is about the one $\dfrac{1}{224}$ of a foot, which is
+therefore the departure from a straight line the
+body at the distance of the moon must make per
+second to move round the earth. The mutual attraction
+of these bodies at that distance is sufficient to produce
+this amount of deflection, and hence accounts for
+the rotation at that distance. When the same mathematical
+relation is applied to the planets, comets, and
+meteors that revolve about the sun, it is found to be
+applicable to every one of them; and in the depths of
+space in every direction are to be seen multitudes of
+stars revolving about each other in similar manner, and
+hence it is concluded that gravitation is a universal property,
+and the law is applicable throughout the universe.
+
+There are other kinds of attraction that matter
+exhibits, such as electric and magnetic, that follow a
+part of the above law, but do not the other part. The
+law regarding the distance is true for electrified bodies,
+but the mass of the bodies does not enter as a controlling
+condition. So it appears that the variability of
+attraction with the distance is a geometrical condition,
+and depends upon the property of space, and is not
+peculiar to any physical phenomenon. Sound, light,
+\DPPageSep{098.png}{86}%
+heat, electricity, magnetism, as well as gravitation,
+exhibit the property, as do circles and spheres. The
+peculiar thing about gravitative attraction is that it
+depends upon the masses of the attracting bodies, and
+is not modified in the slightest degree by the interposition
+of any substance of any magnitude between the
+attracting particles or masses. In this particular it is
+strikingly unlike magnetic attraction. If, for instance,
+a piece of iron is brought between two magnets that at
+a distance are attracting each other, the strength of
+their action upon each other is decidedly less. The
+strength of the attraction of the sun is just as great
+upon a particle in the centre of the earth as for any
+similar particle at an equal distance that is not
+shielded.
+
+There have been numerous attempts in the past to
+account for gravitation. It has been imagined that
+space was full of particles swiftly moving in every direction
+that produced a pressure upon all bodies by their
+impact; that each body shielded other bodies in a measure,
+and hence the pressure produced upon the adjacent
+sides would be less than elsewhere, and, as a consequence,
+each body would be pushed in the direction of
+an adjacent body. But a push represents expended
+energy, and this would imply that the moving particles
+must be losing energy at the expense of their velocity;
+and as no such particles are known, and if there were,
+their velocity would have to be so much greater than
+that of light, there is no degree of probability to be
+allowed for the idea. The effect of vibrations upon
+the ether has been a very common manner of attempting
+\DPPageSep{099.png}{87}%
+\index{Attraction of vibrating fork}%
+to explain gravitation. It has been observed that if
+light bodies are brought near to a vibrating body like a
+tuning-fork, they are apparently attracted by it so long
+as the vibratory motion continues; and the action is
+explained by the rarefaction produced by the vibratory
+motion, which reduces the pressure in the space about
+the body, so when another body is brought near the
+pressure is greater on the remote side than it is on
+the side adjacent, and thus the body is pushed towards
+the one vibrating. It is known that all the atoms of all
+bodies are in a state of vibration at all temperatures;
+and hence it was inferred that the pressure of the ether
+must be reduced next to their surface, so that between
+two atoms or molecules the pressure must be less than
+external to them, and hence the pressure of the ether
+will crowd them together. This idea has been worked
+out by a large number of persons in different countries.
+There are two fatal objections to this hypothesis:
+First, it would make the attraction of gravitation
+dependent upon their temperature, and there is no evidence
+to show that temperature makes any difference;
+and second, that the velocity of gravitative action is the
+same as that of light. There is an abundance of astronomical
+evidence, that if it has any velocity at all it
+must vastly exceed that of light. If it were as much
+as a million times greater, astronomical phenomena
+would exhibit it plainly.
+
+Seeing that every particle of matter in the universe,
+affects every other particle in a certain and definite
+way, no matter what the distance between them, there
+must be either the possibility that a body can act upon
+\DPPageSep{100.png}{88}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+another one at a distance without any medium between
+them,---which is called action at a distance,---or there
+\index{Action at a distance}%
+must be a medium which is first affected by the bodies,
+and which in turn reacts upon other bodies in it.
+What Sir Isaac Newton thought of these contingencies
+was cited in a former chapter (see \Pageref{p.}{31}). It
+is now generally felt to be not only essential for consistent
+mechanical thinking, but that in some way the
+ether which is known to exist must have some essential
+part in the phenomenon. It has been the subject
+of curious speculation why Newton should so strongly
+state his belief in the existence of a medium for the
+propagation of physical conditions, and yet in his work
+on light he should adopt the corpuscular theory---that
+light consisted of emanations, which was a practical
+denial of the hypothesis of the ether. The explanation
+of the anomaly is probably in the fact, that he
+could treat in his mathematical way the ideal corpuscles,
+while he could not so treat the ether hypothesis of
+waves. His work was developed with ideas he could
+handle; and the outcome of it was that the science of
+light was retarded by his misconceptions for a hundred
+years, for every one now who knows anything about it
+knows that Newton's hypothesis was a wrong one.
+There are some persons who would curb the imaginations
+of others in physical things by quoting Newton's
+dictum, ``Hypotheses I do not touch,'' but they omit to
+mention that Newton's work on optics was altogether
+based upon a hypothesis that has wholly broken
+down. Every one of the explanations he gave of
+such phenomena is worthless, and no one gives attention
+\DPPageSep{101.png}{89}%
+\index{Neptune, discovery of}%
+to them except for their historic relations to the
+science.
+
+It has been thus in other lines. A symbolic representation
+of things such as offers the possibility of
+mathematical treatment has been seized and worked out
+to great length, when the actual phenomena pretended
+to be treated gave no countenance to the conceptions.
+Such has been the case in electricity and magnetism and
+heat. The mathematicians fought Ohm's, Faraday's,
+and Joule's mechanical conceptions until death stopped
+them.
+
+It is certainly true that all physical phenomena are
+subject to strictly mathematical conditions, and mathematical
+processes are unassailable in themselves. The
+trouble arises from the data employed. Most phenomena
+are so highly complex that one can never be
+quite sure he is dealing with all the factors until
+experiment proves it. So that experiment is rather a
+criterion of mathematical conclusions and must lead
+the way. Mathematics is a deductive science, yet the
+\index{Mathematics}%
+number of physical facts or phenomena that have been
+discovered by its aid is so small that they may almost
+be left out of the count. There is the discovery of the
+planet Neptune, that has been spoken of as a triumph
+of mathematical science, yet one of the most competent
+mathematicians that ever lived---Professor Peirce of
+Harvard---declared that it was only a lucky find, for the
+computations would apply just as well to a planet $180°$~from
+it. The conical refraction of light is another
+one. Altogether they make but a small figure and
+are unimportant. The law of gravitation was discovered
+\DPPageSep{102.png}{90}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+\index{Hypothesis, gravitation}%
+\index{Kepler, the guesser}%
+by trial, and although its importance is second
+to none other yet discovered, it happens that it is one
+of the very simplest and least complicated with other
+laws we know of; but an explanation of how it can act
+thus, or why it exists at all, or what its antecedents are
+if it has any, these are questions that are matters for
+the guessers, like Kepler, who kept guessing until he
+guessed right, and so discovered what are known as his
+laws. Meanwhile definite mechanical conceptions of
+what the phenomena to be explained are like may be
+helpful to those interested in them.
+
+Suppose two bodies, \textit{A} and \textit{B}, a certain distance apart,
+and they so react upon each other that they tend to
+mutually approach each other. Given a medium, ether,
+can one imagine stresses set up by either body in the
+ether that will be capable of affecting the other?
+
+Imagine a large space like a room occupied by glass
+of uniform texture and properties throughout. If relieved
+of gravitational property, the cohesion of all
+its parts shows that every particle is in some sort of
+stress, no matter what the origin of that may be. Now,
+suppose there could suddenly be created somewhere
+near the middle of the glass a bullet or a marble. It
+would displace so much glass as would be equal to its
+own volume, and the result of that would be that the
+glass about it would be subject to a new stress, which
+would be greatest, at the surface of contact of the
+marble, and would be less as that surface is receded
+from inversely proportional to the square of the distance
+of the point of observation. If the glass be imagined to
+be indefinitely great in magnitude, then the stress would
+\DPPageSep{103.png}{91}%
+extend in every direction through the whole extent of
+it, and at any assignable point would still be in accordance
+with the inverse law, diminishing outward.
+Imagine now another similar marble to be created at
+the distance of a foot from the first. Inasmuch as it
+displaces so much glass it will set up a new stress in
+the latter, and this stress must also be transmitted
+throughout the whole mass as in the first instance.
+Now, here will be two independent stresses overlapping;
+and on account of the nature of the stress, it will be
+greater between the marbles than it will be anywhere
+else, because there the sum of the stresses will be at a
+maximum. If one can now for the moment imagine
+that the glass was of such constitution as to permit a
+motion to the marbles, in any direction, when there was
+a stress tending to move them, it would be obvious
+that the marbles would separate from each other as the
+medium, the glass, was under greater tension between
+them than in any other direction.\footnote
+ {Such bodies might be said to have \emph{negative weight}.}
+And if the glass
+thus mobile was indefinite in extent and without friction,
+the two marbles would continue to separate indefinitely.
+The energy making them thus to move comes directly
+from the medium, which in turn got it from the bodies
+themselves when they were thrust into it, no matter
+how. Such a phenomenon as separation in a manner
+like the above is exactly opposite in character to that
+of gravitation, but it points at once to a consideration
+of the condition necessary to be similar. It was the
+forcing of new material into space already occupied
+with other material that developed the stress and led
+to the above results. It will be necessary to find a way
+\DPPageSep{104.png}{92}%
+\index{Stress in glass}%
+to develop a stress \emph{towards} a point instead of away
+from it.
+
+Suppose, then, that instead of having a created something
+imbedded in it, a cavity of equal volume to the
+marble should be produced in its place. As part of the
+material of the medium has been annihilated, there will
+now be a less stress at its bounding surface than there
+was when it was occupied with material, and the
+direction of the stress will now be towards the cavity.
+That is, the stress will be less there than anywhere
+else in the glass; and this, too, if measured, will be found
+distributed like the other, inversely as the square of the
+distance from the origin. Let another similar cavity
+be produced in the neighborhood of the first, and the
+two stresses will overlap, and there will be less between
+them than in any other direction. Let us imagine now
+that the glass was mobile enough to permit the movement
+of either of these cavities in any direction towards
+which there was any pressure, and they would approach
+each other because pushed by the stress in the glass
+more towards each other than in any other direction.
+If one of these cavities were larger than the other, one
+would expect that the corresponding stress would be
+greater, and so there would be a stress that for direction
+and the resultant movement would correspond with
+what is observed in the phenomena of gravitation.
+
+But such a conception as that of a vacuum as constituting
+what we call the atoms of matter has no mechanical
+validity at all. Atoms have not only volume, they
+have mass, and that requires energy to displace. One
+cannot imagine that the displacement of an absolute
+\DPPageSep{105.png}{93}%
+\index{Stress in ether}%
+vacuum, if such a thing could be done, would require
+any energy, for there would be no mass to move.
+
+Suppose, however,---instead of imagining, as was
+done, the entire volume of the marble to be destroyed,---that
+in some way the volume of the glass marble had
+suddenly been reduced, no matter how, and that the
+diminished volume was retained,---the material had been
+condensed. This would bring about the same relative
+condition of stress to the condensed portion, so that
+there would be less adjacent to it than elsewhere, the
+measure of it being the actual amount of condensation
+represented in the body. What would be true of one
+would be true of others,---an indefinite number,---and
+no number of such stresses would in any manner interfere
+with or neutralize that of others. At any point of
+the space filled with such glass each such condensation
+would have produced its effect at the outset, and if the
+glass were practically limitless in extent this relationship
+would be maintained so long as the reduced
+volumes remained constant.
+
+So far has been considered a condition of things
+somewhat analogous to gravitation; and to apply it one
+needs to imagine the ether to be substituted for the
+glass and the atoms of matter for the imagined condensation,
+and also that the two, the ether and atom,
+are capable of mutual reaction.
+
+There have been some physicists who have imagined
+that the atoms of matter were condensations in the
+ether, but I am not aware that any very satisfactory
+reasons have been given for thinking so. That in itself
+would be no reason for rejecting the idea in the
+\DPPageSep{106.png}{94}%
+\index{Attraction of disks}%
+\index{Hypothesis, needful}%
+absence of a better and more consistent one. For
+scientific purposes a poor hypothesis is better than
+none at all.
+
+A very large amount of scientific work has been
+done by employing hypotheses that are now known to
+be wrong. A working hypothesis is needful. If it be
+wrong, one will by and by find it out and be able to
+amend it, or replace it by a better. If it be right, it
+will be vindicated, and will justify itself, and be generally
+adopted.
+
+Until we know more definitely than is now known
+what the constitution of matter really is, one can only
+guess and try; and among the multitude of interested
+workers in all civilized countries there will be some
+who will guess right to the advantage of all.
+
+If, then, one adopts the vortex ring theory of matter,
+\index{Vortex ring theory of matter}%
+and endeavors to trace the mechanical conditions that
+might obtain with such kind of atoms, he would be
+led to inquire whether a vortex ring does or does not
+exhibit any evidence of condensation in the material
+that is in rotation; that is, does the material of the ring
+occupy the same space while it is in rotation as it does
+when not?
+
+There are several phenomena that seem to show that
+it occupies less space. The reduction of pressure
+in its neighborhood shows a rarefaction there, and the
+mutual approach of such rings and of other light bodies
+in their neighborhood indicates the same thing. If
+one rotates a disk rapidly, any light bodies in front of
+it will tend to approach it even from a distance of
+several inches. If a dozen disks five or six inches in
+\DPPageSep{107.png}{95}%
+\index{Attraction of vortex rings}%
+diameter are set loosely an inch apart upon a spindle a
+foot long, so that they may be rotated fast, yet left free
+to move longitudinally upon the spindle, they will all
+crowd up close together as the pressure is less between
+them than outside. If one can imagine the spindle to
+be flexible and the ends brought opposite each other
+while rotating, it will be seen that the ends would
+exhibit an apparent attraction for each other, and,
+if free to approach, would close up, thus making a
+vortex ring with the sections of disks. If the axis
+of the disks were shrinkable, the whole thing would
+contract to a minimum size that would be determined
+by the rapidity of the rotary movement, in
+which case not only would it be plain why the ring form
+was maintained, but why the diameter of the ring
+as a whole should shrink. So long as it rotated it
+would keep up a stress in the air about it. So far as
+the experimental evidence goes, it appears that a vortex
+ring in the air exhibits the phenomenon in question.
+There is no doubt at all that two vortex rings in the
+air attract each other, for they will mutually approach
+if free to do so, and the explanation is plain that there is
+reduced pressure between them; in other words, the
+characteristic motion of the ring reduces the air
+pressure about it, so that another body within that field
+is pushed towards the place where the pressure is
+least. The reduction of the pressure about any ring
+must evidently depend upon the amount of material
+embodied in it, and more especially the degree of
+rotation which it has. A small, thin but rapidly
+rotating ring might produce as great a rarefaction about
+\DPPageSep{108.png}{96}%
+it as a much larger one with less velocity, hence there
+is something about it that corresponds to what is called
+mass. It is not \emph{simply} an amount of material, but the
+\emph{energy} the material has, which gives it its characteristic
+properties.
+
+Analogy must not be mistaken for identity. There
+is so great a difference between the properties of the
+air and other gases and those of the ether that one
+cannot affirm that what holds true of one must hold
+true of the other; yet that is what is generally done by
+such persons as those who try to show the properties
+of the ether to be identical with those of matter.
+
+We know what conditions are necessary in order that
+a ring should be formed in the air, and one of them is
+that there must be gaseous friction. If that were not
+the case a ring could not be formed. If the ether be
+the frictionless medium it is generally supposed to be,
+one would not know how to make a vortex ring in it.
+On the other hand, the reason a ring in the air is so
+soon destroyed is because of friction; and hence if one
+were made in some unimagined way in the ether it
+would continue to exist indefinitely, but how it could
+act at all upon the ether surrounding it would be a
+mechanical puzzle, and that is the present state of the
+case. The puzzle is no greater with the conception of
+a vortex ring than if the atom were made up in some
+other way, and therefore that objection is not peculiar
+to this hypothesis. It has been confessedly a puzzle
+to see how the vibratory motions of atoms and molecules
+could set up transverse waves in the ether if the
+ether be without friction; nevertheless, they do set up
+\DPPageSep{109.png}{97}%
+such waves. A common objection to all attempts that
+have been made to account for gravitation by means of
+the motions of the atoms themselves is that it not
+only requires a constant expenditure of energy, but that
+the velocity of transmission must be so much greater
+than that of light. Light is transverse vibratory movement.
+A direct longitudinal wave may be much swifter
+than the other. A pull upon a taut rope will travel
+much faster in it than will a wave produced by a transverse
+movement of the hand.
+
+It is not to be understood that what is presented here
+is given as a proof that gravitation is but a simple
+mechanical condition of things. It is probable that
+every one who thinks about it believes that its explanation
+is purely mechanical. Some perhaps are pessimistic,
+and doubt that man will ever be able to understand
+its mysteries, but pessimists are not discoverers. They
+frequently so chill the air about them that more hopeful
+ones, who are not persuaded that the end has yet
+been reached, are sometimes deterred from venturing
+into fields where they have to pass such self-constituted
+gate-keepers.
+
+There are few physical problems of any generality
+and complexity that are abruptly and completely solved
+by one person. Tentative steps must be taken, and
+much labor is oftentimes spent upon ideas that by and
+by are proved to be worthless. A good deal of the
+work done by Laplace upon the Nebula theory was
+\index{Nebula theory}%
+of that sort; yet all astronomers hold the Nebula theory
+in some form: what the exact process was, if solely
+mechanical, may be interesting, but not very important
+from a philosophical standpoint.
+\DPPageSep{110.png}{98}%
+
+So one may hold that gravitation is a mechanical
+action, and in some way explainable on mechanical
+principles, even if he does not see how at all.
+
+This chapter may help some to see not only what
+the character of the problem is, but what factors are
+present, and how somewhat similar phenomena may be
+reproduced at will; but the radical distinction that
+exists between the ether and matter must always be
+kept in mind.
+%\DPPageSep{111.png}{99}%
+
+
+\Chapter{VI}{Heat}{99}
+
+\index{Heat, mechanical origin of}%
+
+\First{Heat} and cold are two words we apply to contrasted
+sensations, either of which may imply comfort or discomfort;
+and what is meant by either word in a given
+case depends altogether upon what the sensation is
+compared with. Thus, one would speak of a day when
+the thermometer indicated one hundred degrees in the
+shade as being a hot day, while if his cup of coffee had
+the same temperature it would be called cold; so the
+terms imply only roughly some departure from a
+standard of comfort. To obtain more definite knowledge
+of that physical condition which gives us the
+sensation we call heat, it is necessary to attend to its
+origin and its effects upon other bodies.
+
+\Section{I. MECHANICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+When a blacksmith hammers a small piece of iron,
+like a nail, upon his anvil, it becomes too hot to hold,
+and it even may be made to glow, red-hot, by the
+repeated blows of the hammer. If a bullet be shot
+against a target and be quickly picked up, it is found to
+be hot; and in general the impact of any two bodies
+always results in heating both of them. In the above
+cases both the hammer and the target are heated, but
+\DPPageSep{112.png}{100}%
+on account of their size the degree of heat is not so
+noticeable as it is with the smaller bodies.
+
+In like manner if the knuckles be rubbed briskly
+upon one's sleeve, the sensation of heat becomes
+unbearable in a very brief time. The friction of the
+surfaces develops the heat, as may be learned by
+taking a button or some similar object, and in the same
+brisk manner rub it on the sleeve or other convenient
+surface, and it will get too hot to be safely touched
+against the skin. On a larger scale the brakes upon
+railroad-cars exhibit the same quality when they have
+been applied for a few seconds. The sparks that may
+be seen flying from them in the dark is testimony to
+the same thing; while the car-wheel boxes are often so
+heated by the constant friction when the lubricating
+oil is wanting, that the cotton waste takes fire, and
+even locomotives may be delayed by their hot journals.
+This source of heat is so common that instances may
+be cited indefinitely. It is universally true that the
+friction of one body moving in contact with another
+heats them both, and the heat developed depends upon
+the pressure and the velocity of the moving surfaces.
+It is true not only for solids, but for liquids and gases
+as well, and the friction of solids moving in either
+liquids or gases. An extreme case of the latter kind is
+illustrated by the shining trail of a meteor when it
+enters the atmosphere. Its velocity is very great---twenty
+or thirty miles a second---and the friction of the
+air is so great on account of the high speed that it
+renders the surface of the meteorite red-hot, and some
+of its molecules are ground off as they would be if it
+\DPPageSep{113.png}{101}%
+were held against a swift turning emery-wheel that
+scatters the sparks in the air. The luminous trail consists
+of these heated particles. If the body is not large,
+and most meteors are quite small, they may be entirely
+ground to powder and dissipated before they can reach
+the earth. Most meteors in this way rarely pass
+through more than fifty or sixty miles of our atmosphere
+before this happens.
+
+Another mechanical source of heat is compression.
+Let a bullet be hard squeezed in a vise, or in any other
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[htb]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{4in}{113a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{4}{Diag.\ 4.}
+\end{figure}
+way, and it is found that its heat is perceptibly increased.
+Small differences of this sort may be easily detected
+by the use of the thermopile and galvanometer.
+
+The rubbed button or pounded or squeezed bullet
+placed upon the face of the thermopile shows the presence
+of an amount of heat which the sense of heat
+would %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[11]{l}{.5in}
+\null\hfill\Graphic{.25in}{114a}\hfill
+ \Caption{5}{Diag.\ 5.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+never detect. Gases exhibit the heating effect
+through pressure in a high degree. Before the invention
+of friction matches, which are themselves good
+\DPPageSep{114.png}{102}%
+\index{Heat, chemical origin of}%
+examples of the production of heat by friction, metallic
+tubes, closed at one end with a tight-fitting plunger to
+be worked by hand, were in common use for lighting
+fires. A bit of punky wood was fixed to the
+end of the plunger, and the latter was then
+quickly driven to the bottom of the tube. The
+air was compressed to so great an extent that
+the heat developed became sufficient to ignite
+the punk. The same heating effect of compression
+may be shown by the thermopile and galvanometer
+by compressing the air with an air-condenser,
+and permitting the air thus condensed to
+strike on its exit upon the face of the pile.
+
+Thus impact, or \emph{sudden} stopping of mechanical
+motion, friction, or the \emph{gradual} stopping of mechanical
+motion and condensation, or compelling molecules
+to occupy less space, all of them of a purely
+mechanical nature, result invariably in heating the
+matter that is subject to the action.
+
+\Section{II. CHEMICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+The heat that results from the combustion of fuels
+of all sorts is due to the chemical changes that take
+place. When coal burns, its substance, carbon, is
+entering into combination with the oxygen of the air,
+and a new chemical product is formed called carbon
+dioxide, which is a gas; and the change is accompanied
+by the production of a large amount of heat, which we
+utilize for our comfort or for the various arts that
+depend upon heat as an agent. Wood, alcohol, the
+various oils,---everything capable of burning, and which
+\DPPageSep{115.png}{103}%
+may be called fuels---are, in the process of burning,
+\index{Fuels}%
+undergoing what is called oxidation, in which new
+chemical compounds are formed and which are nearly
+all gaseous. Thus the products of the combustion of
+\index{Combustion}%
+wood, alcohol, coal-oil, etc., are always carbon dioxide
+gas, and the vapor of water; and the heat developed is
+proportionate to the amount of these produced.
+
+But combustion is not the only chemical source. If
+sulphuric acid be mixed with water, the compound
+becomes very hot although it is liquid. The two
+substances enter into an intimate chemical combination.
+A pint of each mixed together will not make a quart,
+but will fall short of that volume a good deal when
+they have cooled. This shows that condensation has
+taken place; and, knowing that condensation produces
+heat when brought about in other ways, one might have
+suspected that chemical condensation would result in
+a similar development of heat.
+
+Some substances when in a finely divided state,
+though what we generally call solids, are capable of
+entering into combination with each other at a very
+rapid rate and then develop a great deal of heat.
+Such a substance as gunpowder, a combination of carbon,
+\index{Gunpowder}%
+sulphur, and the nitrate of potash, when intimately
+mixed, will combine with explosive violence, and great
+heat results from it, as shown by the attending flash
+and the scorching effects it produces upon some bodies
+that do not happen to be destroyed by the explosion.
+All chemical reactions whatever involve in some degree
+temperature changes; and by so much one might be
+led to suspect that there might not be so great a
+\DPPageSep{116.png}{104}%
+\index{Heat, electrical origin of}%
+difference between the mechanical \DPtypo{souces}{sources} of heat at
+first considered and the more obscure chemical ones as
+one might think who attends only to the more prominent
+features of the two. If one should adopt for
+a basis of his philosophy that like causes produce like
+effects, what shall he say when he sees the same effect
+produced by pounding with a hammer, condensing a
+gas, and burning a piece of wood? Either unlike causes
+can produce similar effects, or fundamentally these
+three processes are the same. We will attend to that
+question more at length farther on.
+
+
+\Section{III\@. ELECTRICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+As a chapter is to be given to electricity and its
+phenomena, it will be sufficient here to point out that
+wherever a current of electricity is flowing in a conductor,
+there heat is invariably produced. The heat in
+an electric arc is so great that all known substances are
+either fused or volatilized in it. Gold, platinum, the
+ruby, are easily reduced to the liquid form, and the
+diamond slowly wastes away, being oxidized like a piece
+of coal. Electric furnaces are now in use where the
+most refractory substances, like clay, are reduced, and
+the metal aluminum extracted from it. So long as it
+cost so much to produce electricity as it did before the
+dynamo was perfected, no one could afford to use it for
+heating purposes. Now there will shortly be electric
+heaters in houses, replacing stoves for cooking and
+furnaces for warmth. The electrical current can be
+brought on the wire where it is wanted, and the heat
+developed from it to any degree desired. Electricity,
+then, is another source of heat.
+\DPPageSep{117.png}{105}%
+\index{Energy in the ether}%
+\index{Heat, radiational origin of}%
+
+
+\Section{IV\@. RADIATIVE ORIGIN.}
+
+When one stands near a blazing fire the warmth felt
+does not come from the heated air between the fire
+and the person; for when one shields his face or hands
+the warmth ceases to be felt, though the temperature
+of the air might be the same in both cases.
+
+In like manner sunshine warms the earth, although
+between the sun and the earth there is an enormous
+space without air or other matter, through which the
+sun's rays come producing warmth \emph{when they get here}.
+This process of giving out rays to the ether independent
+of matter, which is possessed by hot bodies, is called
+radiation. It has been shown that all bodies are at all
+times giving out such radiations; and oftentimes the
+radiation itself is called radiant energy, sometimes it
+is called light, and sometimes simply ether waves.
+Here we do not attend to the origin of the waves, but
+to the fact that when such waves fall upon matter they
+result in heating it, and therefore radiation must be
+looked upon as a fourth source of heat.
+
+I would again suggest the thought presented a page
+or two back, as to the similarity or dissimilarity of each
+of these four kinds of origins of heat,---mechanical,
+chemical, electrical, radiant. They appear to be utterly
+unlike each other, yet their effects upon matter are identical,
+always thus and never different, so far as our experience
+goes. Evidently there must be some factor
+common to them all; and if this could be known for any
+one of them, it would throw light upon all the rest. If
+we take, for instance, the mechanical origin of heat,
+\DPPageSep{118.png}{106}%
+say, impact, which is one of the most obvious, and note
+the factors present, it is plain there are but two;
+namely, a mass of matter with a certain measurable
+amount of motion of the translational variety. These
+two embody the energy represented by the impact, and
+of these the translational motion is destroyed when the
+heat appears. The other factor, the mass of matter,
+remains constant. The motion that was seen needs to
+be accounted for; and as the heat that appears is the
+result of that motion, it appears probable that in some
+way the translational motion has been transformed into
+some other kind of motion, not that it has been annihilated.
+
+
+\Section{TEMPERATURE.}
+\index{Temperature}%
+
+If a pint of boiling-hot water be mixed with a pint
+of ice-cold water, the mixture will have all the heat
+there was in the pint of hot water, but it would not
+injure the hand thrust into it. The heat that was in
+one pint has been distributed through two pints, and
+hence each pint has one-half the heat that was in the
+hot pint. A red-hot bar of iron will be cooled by being
+thrust into a pail of water. The water will be heated,
+and will have all the heat the bar lost; but as it is distributed
+through so great a volume of water, the
+amount of heat in a cubic inch of it will be but a small
+proportion of the whole.
+
+The word ``temperature'' is used to denote the degree
+of heat there may be in a unit volume of a substance, and
+this is measured by means of thermometers in which
+the property that heat possesses of expanding the volume
+of bodies is made to indicate their degree of heat. The
+\DPPageSep{119.png}{107}%
+standard for this is an arbitrary one altogether. In the
+common Fahrenheit thermometer there is a tube of glass
+\index{Thermometer}%
+with a bulb upon it filled with mercury. This, when put
+into ice-water, acquires the same temperature, and the
+mercury stands at a certain height in the tube, which is
+marked. Then it is put into boiling-hot water, where
+the mercury expands and reaches another height in the
+tube, which is also marked. The space between the
+two marks is divided into one hundred and eighty equal
+parts, and the same scale of division is carried beyond
+in both directions. A point thirty-two of these divisions
+below the mark of the melting ice is called zero;
+so between it and the boiling-point are two hundred
+and twelve divisions, called degrees. The centigrade
+thermometer is more generally used in scientific work.
+In this the space between the freezing and boiling
+points is divided into one hundred equal parts, called
+also degrees. A centigrade degree is $\dfrac{9}{5}$~larger than a
+Fahrenheit degree. The scales of either may be extended
+indefinitely for the measurement of temperatures
+departing from the more usual ones. For a lower
+limit one cannot use the mercury below about forty
+degrees below zero; for it freezes at that temperature,
+and no longer follows the same law of contraction. As
+alcohol does not freeze, thermometer tubes filled with
+it are used to indicate such low temperature. In the
+Arctic regions, and even in Siberia, the temperature
+falls to fifty or sixty degrees below zero not infrequently
+in winter, but temperatures have artificially been produced
+as low as $400°$~below zero.
+\DPPageSep{120.png}{108}%
+
+For the higher limits mercury thermometers can be
+used for higher temperatures than alcohol, for the latter
+boils and becomes vapor at~$174°$. The following table
+of temperatures may be interesting:---
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{p{3in}@{\ }r}%[** PP: Hard-coded width]
+Absolute zero \dotfill & $-460°$ \\
+Lowest degree artificially produced \dotfill & $-400°$ \\
+Lowest degree measured in Siberia \dotfill & $-72°$ \\
+Mercury freezes \dotfill & $-39°$ \\
+Water freezes \dotfill & $32°$ \\
+Blood in man \dotfill & $98.6°$ \\
+Temperature observed in India \dotfill & $140°$ \\
+Alcohol boils \dotfill & $174°$ \\
+Water boils \dotfill & $212°$ \\
+Lead melts \dotfill & $612°$ \\
+Mercury boils \dotfill & $650°$ \\
+Red heat visible in dark \dotfill & $1000°$ \\
+Silver melts \dotfill & $1873°$ \\
+Gold melts \dotfill & $2200°$ \\
+Iron melts \dotfill & $2700°$ \\
+Platinum melts \dotfill & $3600°$ \\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+\index{Temperature, table}%
+
+Gases, like liquids and solids, are increased in volume
+by heat when permitted to expand. If not permitted,
+the pressure upon the walls of the containing vessel is
+increased; and it is found that this pressure is proportionate
+to the temperature, and also that the pressure
+diminishes about~$\dfrac{1}{273}$ for each centigrade degree of cooling,
+starting at the freezing-point of water. If, therefore,
+a gas could be cooled from that point $273°$~centigrade,
+it would have no pressure, as it would have no
+temperature. Such a degree has never yet been reached;
+but all phenomena having any bearing upon the subject
+\DPPageSep{121.png}{109}%
+indicate that at~$-273°$ there is no heat: it is an
+absolute zero. The molecules %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{0.5in}
+\null\hfill\Graphic{0.25in}{121a}
+\Caption{6}{Diag.\ 6.}%
+\end{wrapfigure}
+would have no translational
+motion, otherwise they would produce
+some pressure upon the walls of the vessel that
+contained them. Air thermometers may be
+\index{Thermometer, air}%
+made with bulbs blown upon the end of a glass
+tube. A small drop of water in the tube will
+be pushed in or out as the temperature varies,
+and is much more sensitive than ordinary thermometers;
+but barometric pressure affects it
+and renders it unfit for common use, but its indications
+are proportionate to the absolute scale;
+that is, the volume of the air at the melting-point
+of water will be increased or diminished~$\dfrac{1}{273}$
+by every change of one degree in cooling or heating,
+or~$\smash[t]{dfrac{1}{490}}$ if the degree be Fahrenheit.
+
+
+\Section{MECHANICAL EQUIVALENT.}
+\index{Heat, mechanical equivalent}%
+
+For a long time it was supposed that heat was a kind
+of substance that ordinary matter could absorb and
+emit. It was sometimes called caloric; and that word is
+in common use to-day, but not in the sense it originally
+had. Sometimes it was spoken of as one of the imponderables---a
+substance without weight. Now there is
+only one imponderable recognized, that is the ether. Sir
+Humphry Davy and Count Rumford found they could
+produce an indefinite amount of heat by the friction of
+one body upon another; and that implied if heat was a
+substance of any sort, that any piece of matter contained
+an infinite amount of heat, else one could get
+\DPPageSep{122.png}{110}%
+out of a body what was not in it. These two men concluded
+that heat was a kind of molecular motion, and
+that what their experiments showed was that friction
+only transformed the mechanical motion into molecular
+motion, which was called heat.
+
+The old conceptions had got so thoroughly incorporated
+into both the thoughts and the writings of others,
+that they could not easily be dislodged, and men went
+on as they had done. It was easier to do that than to
+change notions and terms that were familiar for others
+that were strange, even if true. A whole generation of
+men had to be buried before any attention was paid to
+what had been proved in the early part of the century.
+Soon after 1840 it occurred to a number of persons in
+different countries that if heat were but transformed
+mechanical motion there should be some quantitative
+relationship between them that might be discovered;
+that is, a given amount of mechanical motion ought to
+produce a definite amount of heat, and \textit{vice versa}.
+This was worked out in the most complete and satisfactory
+way by Joule of England. His method consisted
+\index{Joule}%
+in churning a definite amount of water and observing
+the rise in temperature in it. The churn paddle was
+driven by a known weight falling a known distance, and
+therefore the work done in driving the paddles was
+known in foot-pounds. In this way he found that $772$~pounds
+falling one foot would heat a pound of water
+one degree, and he called this number the mechanical
+equivalent of heat. In like manner it is said that when
+a pound of water loses one degree in temperature, it has
+lost energy enough to raise $772$~pounds one foot high.
+\DPPageSep{123.png}{111}%
+This relationship renders it easy to determine the
+amount of work a given amount of heat can do, and
+also the temperature that will be acquired by a given
+amount of water when a definite amount of work is
+done upon it. But the scientific importance of this
+new step is much greater than its practical utility.
+Before that time men had thought there were such
+things as \emph{forces}, independent of each other; and such an
+idea as mutual convertibility had not dawned upon any
+philosophic mind. Physical philosophers were so much
+misled by their terminology and the accompanying
+notions, that Joule's work, though demonstrative, made
+no impression upon them for several years, and it was
+refused a place in the transactions of their society for
+seven years. The reason for this common hostility to
+new knowledge is probably not far to seek. When one
+has achieved distinction in his line of work, especially
+in physical science, he is likely to possess his own philosophy
+of things, in which not a small part of the data
+is symbolic and is represented in mind only by a name;
+and if this chances to suggest something mysterious, as,
+for instance, an imponderable, the less is one likely to
+attempt, or suffer others to attempt, to displace it by
+definite mechanical conceptions. To change one's
+fundamental conceptions necessitates a change in his
+philosophy throughout,---a change that is not only difficult,
+but highly \DPtypo{distaseful}{distasteful}; and one ought not to expect
+a welcome to a man whose work necessitates such a
+change.
+
+Within the present century the advance in all directions
+has been such as to give definite mechanical
+\DPPageSep{124.png}{112}%
+\index{Thermodynamics}%
+conceptions and relations where before only ghosts and
+genii were supposed to do duty; and what can a man do
+when his genii have been slain and he must now depend
+upon~$mv^2$? To become acquainted with his new associate
+is generally the last thing he sets himself about.
+It was with Joule as it was with all the prophets and
+discoverers. Joule, however, was young, and he lived
+to attend the funeral of all his detractors.
+
+That heat and work are mutually convertible is now
+called the first law of thermo-dynamics; and it has led
+directly to a knowledge of the working-power there is
+in fuels, and made the duty of steam-engines and other
+sources of power beautifully simple.
+
+The amount of heat needed to raise the temperature
+of a pound of water one degree Fahrenheit is called a
+\emph{heat unit}. The amount of heat needed to raise the
+\index{Heat unit}%
+temperature of a kilogram of water one centigrade
+degree is sometimes called a calorie, and this is a
+unit in common use. It is found by careful experiment
+that a pound of coal when burnt gives up $14500$
+\emph{heat units}, or would raise the temperature of $100$~pounds
+of water~$145°$, or to any other equivalent. A
+pound of hydrogen, in like manner, burning with oxygen,
+will give $61000$ units, a pound of wood about
+$7000$, and so on. Each different substance has its own
+equivalent of such heat units. As each unit will do
+$772$ foot-pounds of work, a pound of coal, when burnt,
+will give $14500 × 772 = 11,194000$ foot-pounds of
+work, and so on for any other. This equivalency is
+independent of time or place. Whether the coal burns
+fast or slow makes no difference. When wood is
+\DPPageSep{125.png}{113}%
+burned in the fire it develops its work-power fast; but
+when it slowly rots it is undergoing the same process,
+oxidation, and the same amount of heat is developed,
+though at no time does the temperature appear to be
+above that of surrounding things. The food we eat possesses
+its mechanical equivalent, which is the maximum
+amount of work it would enable one to do. If bread
+and butter were used for the fuel of an engine, it would
+develop about $21000$ heat units (or calories) per pound,
+and this is equal to $772 × 21000 = 16,212000$ foot-pounds,
+and it has the same value when used for food;
+and thus one may know approximately the amount of
+energy he is supplied with from day to day; also, he
+may compare the amount of work he does, in lifting,
+walking, or otherwise, in a day with the food equivalent
+absorbed. Some of this is, of course, used to
+maintain the temperature of the body, the circulation
+of the blood, and so on---conditions that are tolerably
+constant.
+
+
+\Section{THE STEAM-ENGINE.}
+\index{Steam-engine}%
+
+The steam-engine is a machine for utilizing the
+heating-power of fuels, and, when complete, consists of
+furnace, boiler, and engine. The furnace transforms
+the energy of the fuel and air into heat units in the
+boiler, and the engine transforms this into the work of
+whatever sort it may be applied to.
+
+Evidently the efficiency of such an engine must depend
+upon how large a proportion of the heat units it
+utilizes compared with the heat units supplied to it.
+Steam-engines permit the steam to escape into the air
+\DPPageSep{126.png}{114}%
+\index{Steam-engine, efficiency of}%
+generally with a temperature higher than boiling water,
+and that means a great waste of unused heat; for the
+steam in the engine loses temperature proportionate to
+the work done by it, and, as stated before, the steam
+pressure is proportionate to its absolute temperature,
+not its temperature as indicated by common thermometers.
+And the absolute temperature on Fahrenheit scale
+will \DPtypo{he}{be} found by adding~$460$ to the indicated temperature.
+Suppose, then, an engine-boiler delivered steam
+to the engine at $248° \text{ Fah.} = 708 \text{ absolute}$, and on exit
+from the cylinder it was $212° \text{ Fah.} = 672 \text{ absolute}$, then
+the proportionate amount of work done compared with
+the whole supplied would be $\dfrac{708 - 672}{708} = \dfrac{36}{708}$, or only
+about five per cent of the heating-power of the fuel.
+Higher efficiency must be looked for chiefly by using
+steam at higher temperature and, therefore, higher pressure,
+which would increase the value of the numerator.
+
+The efficiency of engines is generally given in the
+amount of coal required to maintain one horse-power
+per hour. A horse-power for an hour is equal to
+$33000 × 60 = 1,980000$ foot-pounds; and the coal required
+varies from about two pounds in the best engines
+to six or eight pounds, locomotive engines generally
+being less efficient. As one pound of coal when burnt
+has an equivalent of $11,194000$ foot-pounds of work,
+two pounds will give $22,398000$ foot-pounds. When
+that maintains a horse-power for an hour, or $1,980000$
+foot-pounds, the efficiency is $\dfrac{1,980000}{22,398000} = 8 \text{ per cent}$.
+This appears very low; but it is to be remembered that
+\DPPageSep{127.png}{115}%
+\index{Heat, nature of}%
+the coal is seldom anywhere near pure; that much heat
+escapes by the flues without heating the water; that
+much is lost by heating the engine, boiler, and the
+pipes, etc., that does no good, and most of that that does
+go through the engine escapes to the air without having
+done any work; and it cannot be helped, for steam condenses
+to water at~\DPtypo{$212$,°}{$212°$,} and is no longer able to do
+steam service. In reality, such an efficiency is relatively
+high.
+
+
+\Section{AS TO THE NATURE OF HEAT.}
+
+It has been pointed out that it was concluded early
+in the century that heat must be some kind of motion,
+because its production depended solely upon antecedent
+motion, and that later the quantitative relationship
+between the two was accurately defined. The
+\emph{nature} of heat was ascertained, but the particular kind
+of motion that gave it its characteristics was not made
+out; that is, whether the motion was one of free path
+of the molecules,---a swinging to and fro in space,---or
+a true vibratory motion, such as a change of form of
+the molecules and atoms that made up the heated body,
+or a rotation of them, or a combination of any or all of
+these, was unknown. At first the conjecture prevailed
+that it was an oscillatory motion of the molecules
+among themselves even in a solid body; but after the
+discovery of spectrum analysis it became apparent that
+the atoms and molecules were in a state of true vibration,
+and their temperature depended upon the amplitude
+of that vibration. If one will remember that the
+atoms of matter are certainly elastic, and are not solid,
+\DPPageSep{128.png}{116}%
+\index{Hydrogen vibrations}%
+\index{Vibrations, gaseous}%
+and will also picture to himself what mechanically
+must happen when such a body is struck in any manner,
+that it \emph{must} vibrate, for the same reason that any
+visible elastic body must vibrate if struck, he will see
+quite clearly the condition of things among elastic
+atoms that collide with each other so many times per
+second.
+
+That they do thus vibrate is proved by the spectrum
+of substances in the gaseous state where between impacts
+they have time to vibrate a great number of
+times per second. At ordinary temperatures and density
+a gaseous molecule of hydrogen, having a mean free
+path of about the two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of
+an inch, and moving at the rate of $6000$~feet per
+second, will collide with its neighbors $17750$ millions
+of times per second, but its spectrum shows that it
+makes $450$~millions of millions of vibrations in the same
+interval, so that in each interval between impacts it
+would be able to make $\dfrac{450,000000,000000}{17750,000000} = 25352$,
+more than twenty-five thousand vibrations.
+
+Now, imagine a number of bells suspended by cords
+of equal length from the ceiling, but not so near as to
+touch each other. Suppose each bell to have the same
+musical pitch as every other one, and now let one of
+the outer ones be pulled away from the rest and forcibly
+swung back among them; presently every bell
+among them would be set swinging by the impact of
+others upon it, and each impact would cause each bell
+to sound its own particular pitch, and the elasticity of
+each individual one would maintain that vibration in
+\DPPageSep{129.png}{117}%
+some degree until the next impact, when it would be
+strengthened, and one would hear along with the
+bumping of the bells the sound due to the pitch of
+the individual bells. Something very like this goes on
+among the molecules of the gas. Their vibratory
+movements we cannot hear, but with the spectroscope
+they are detected and measured. Now, hot bodies cool
+by radiation---the giving-off of just such waves in the
+ether as we are describing,---and the fact that such cooling
+molecules of a gas give out constant wave-lengths,
+as is shown by their spectrum lines, is proof that the
+vibrations that originate the waves
+are not %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.25in}
+\Graphic{1.25in}{129a}
+\Caption{7}{Diag.\ 7.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+free-path or oscillatory motions,
+but true atomic ones, due to a
+\emph{change in form}. How this can be is
+easily seen by considering the change
+in form made by any vibrating body,
+say, a ring. Let the heavy lined ring
+represent an elastic atom: if it be subjected to impact it
+will assume an elliptical outline, and go through a series
+of phases represented by the dotted lines. This change
+of form, and uniform vibration, is a mechanical necessity,
+and is independent of the size or particular form a
+body may have. It is this kind of motion that embodies
+the energy represented by the temperature of
+an atom or a molecule, and the temperature varies with
+the square of the amplitude of this motion; and two
+bodies have the same temperature when their molecules
+have the same vibratory energy. A single molecule in
+free space would radiate all its heat away, and thus be
+reduced to absolute zero, if it were not continually
+\DPPageSep{130.png}{118}%
+\index{Heat, nature of}%
+receiving from other bodies an amount that depended
+upon its nearness to them and their own amplitude of
+similar motion. Hence the temperature of a body
+depends upon the amplitude of vibration of its molecules,
+and not upon any translatory or oscillatory or
+rotatory motions. This is not saying that molecules
+that are heated do not have other motions than the
+vibratory ones constituting their temperature, but
+when they do have others it is at the expense of the
+vibratory, and therefore has reduced the temperature;
+and such free-path motion as all gases have, and which
+produces pressure upon the walls of vessels, is maintained
+by the vibratory. It is not heat, but the result
+of heat, in the same way as the translatory motion of
+a bullet is not heat, but the result of heat. Most books
+on heat do not make the distinction here made, but
+combine the heat-motion of the molecules themselves
+with the translatory motion they have, calling the sum
+of them the heat of the gas. So long as one is concerned
+only with the energy involved in the actions it
+will make no difference; but if one analyzes the process
+for the factors it is plain that there are two distinct
+kinds of motion---one of them capable of setting
+up waves in the ether, the other not, for it is not known
+that any free-path or translatory movement of a body
+ever disturbs the ether; and if distinctions of such
+marked characters as these exist, and one of them involves
+temperature and ether waves, and the other
+does not, they ought not both to be called by the same
+name. The peculiar character of the energy involved
+in heat as distinguished from so-called mechanical
+\DPPageSep{131.png}{119}%
+\index{Heat of the sun, origin of}%
+energy, is that the factor of motion is of the vibratory
+sort, whereas the other is more or less translatory,---one
+capable of easy transformation into ether waves,
+the other incapable of such transformation, but each
+of them easily transformed into the other by impact.
+Equivalent velocities give the same amount of working
+ability, or $\dfrac{W v^2}{2g} = \dfrac{W a^2 n^2}{2g} = P d$ (see \Pageref{p.}{69}). So it
+can be understood how ordinary visible motion can be
+transformed into heat, and \textit{vice versa}, as easily as one
+can understand how the motion of the clapper of a bell
+is transformed into sound.
+
+
+\Section{ORIGIN OF THE SUN'S HEAT.}
+
+There has been much speculation as to the source of
+the heat of the sun. Unless one assumes that it has
+some miraculous or non-physical origin he is bound to
+account for it, if at all, upon the assumption that physical
+conditions and relations, such as we find at the
+earth, hold good at the sun as elsewhere.
+
+At the beginning of this chapter the various sources
+of heat were considered,---the mechanical, the chemical,
+the electric, and the radiative. If these be tested as
+to their sufficiency to account for the temperature of the
+sun, one may reach a conclusion as to the probability
+of any or all of them being concerned in it and their
+relative importance.
+
+It will be convenient to consider them in the reverse
+order, and first as to radiations. In order that a body
+should become heated by radiations, there must first be
+some body or bodies having as high or higher temperature
+\DPPageSep{132.png}{120}%
+to give rise to the radiations; and in this case, if
+the sun's heat came from such a source, one would need
+to look for the other bodies in the universe having such
+high temperature. The millions of stars shining by
+their own light would at first seem to furnish the proper
+source; for the testimony of the spectroscope is that
+they all are highly heated, and some astronomers think
+some of them to be much hotter than the sun is. One
+of the conditions under which radiant energy is distributed
+in space is that its amount upon a given surface is
+inversely as the square of the distance from the source;
+and as every one of these bodies is at such an amazing
+distance away, it is only with the most delicate instruments
+that their radiant energy can be measured, and a
+given surface upon the earth would receive as much as
+the same surface upon the sun, and the earth would be
+heated from the same source as much as the sun would
+be. Practically it is found to be but a very small quantity,
+and hence radiation from other bodies cannot
+possibly account for the sun's heat.
+
+Second, as to electrical currents: it may be said at the
+outset we have no direct knowledge that there are such
+at the sun, and from other knowledge we have of its
+constitution it would appear to be highly improbable
+that there were or could be electric currents there.
+Electric currents imply some generator and some conductor
+for their transference; and from what is known
+or may fairly be inferred that every substance we are
+acquainted with as a conductor of electricity which is
+present in the sun---and there are a good many of
+them---iron being particularly abundant, yet they are
+\DPPageSep{133.png}{121}%
+all at such a high temperature as to be a far reach from
+the conductibility we know anything about. There
+may be, but it is by no means certain, something solid
+in the sun, but the most of it is as gaseous as a bubble,
+and gases do not conduct currents of electricity.
+
+Third, chemical action is known to be the antecedent
+of vast quantities of heat. It may be recalled that a
+pound of hydrogen, for instance, when allowed to combine
+chemically with oxygen will give out $61000$ heat
+units. The atmosphere of the sun appears to be made
+up of elements mostly in an uncombined form, except
+in the cooler, outlying parts; that is, the temperature is
+so high that chemical combination is impossible except
+in exposed places where radiation can allow cooling to
+take place. It is tolerably certain that chemical combinations
+are taking place there whenever it is possible,
+and with such combination heat must be produced, if
+physical laws are in operation there as they are at the
+earth, but the amount of it going on, or possible, if the
+whole body of the sun were to combine its elements in
+this way, does not appear to begin to be equal to the
+expenditure of heat actually taking place.
+
+There remains only the mechanical sources of impact,
+friction, and condensation. There is good evidence
+that there is a large body of meteors in the neighborhood
+of the sun that must be falling upon its surface.
+The sun's attraction can give a velocity of nearly four
+hundred miles a second to any body reaching him from
+distant space, and such a velocity would, on impact,
+produce heat enough to reduce the whole body to a
+gaseous state almost instantly.
+\DPPageSep{134.png}{122}%
+\index{Sun, its magnitude}%
+\index{Sun, its heat}%
+\index{Sun, its age}%
+
+Given the mass and velocity of a body, and one may
+calculate how much energy it has, and how much heat
+is the equivalent of the mechanical energy. Such a
+computation shows that even if the earth were to fall
+into the sun, it would be volatilized in a very brief time.
+If the sun's surface were solid the impact would be
+sufficient to effect it almost instantly. If the shell of the
+sun were liquid it would be changed more slowly through
+friction, but, in the end, the result would be the same.
+It does not appear, however, that there is sufficient
+material that finds its way to the sun to furnish but a
+small proportion of the sun's heat, so neither impact
+nor friction can be admitted as sufficient agencies.
+There remains but one more, namely, compression. Is
+there any evidence that condensation is taking place?
+The body of the sun is $866000$ miles in diameter, and
+is so far away that this immense magnitude occupies
+but about half a degree of arc. If it were to shrink at
+the rate of a mile in twenty years, it would account for
+the present rate of expenditure, but such a shrinkage
+could not be observed from the earth for several thousand
+years, for nothing much less than a second of arc
+can be observed with certainty, and a second of arc at
+the sun's distance is equal to about $465$~miles, so it would
+require $465 × 20 = 9300$ years to produce an observable
+effect.
+
+Now, if the nebula theory be true, the sun once occupied
+all the space between itself and the outer boundary
+of the solar system and has shrunk to its present dimensions,
+a process which, if heat alone were concerned,
+would require about eighteen millions of years. It is
+\DPPageSep{135.png}{123}%
+\index{Heat, effects}%
+not probable that heat alone has been concerned, so
+it is probable that the sun is older than that, but the
+shrinkage will account for the heat, and it appears as
+the only probable conjecture. It will be understood
+that the gravitative action is the occasion of the compression,
+and that the approach is constant and as fast
+as the generated heat can be radiated away. It has
+been calculated that at the above rate of condensation
+it may be reduced to one-half its present diameter with
+its present radiation rate, in about five million years,
+when its density will be about twice that of water.
+
+From such considerations it appears in a high degree
+probable that the heat of the sun is due to condensation,
+the condensation is due to gravitation, and thus
+one is led back to a time when the substance of the
+sun and all the planets was scattered through that
+immense space, the diameter of which is not less than
+six thousand millions of miles. How matter came to
+be thus scattered is at present an enigma. It is important
+to remark here, though, that until there was impact
+among atoms, and molecules were formed, there evidently
+could be no such condition as what we call heat, and
+until these atoms and molecules vibrated there could
+be no light, that is, ether waves.
+
+
+\Section{EFFECTS OF HEAT.}
+
+Once in possession of a good, mechanical conception
+of the action going on in a heated body, one can proceed
+to trace out the various effects of heat in all
+directions. Thus to take the familiar one of pressure
+in a gas. A gas is simply a large number of individual
+\DPPageSep{136.png}{124}%
+\index{Molecules, number of, in universe}%
+molecules moving about with great velocity and bumping
+against each other and the sides of the containing
+vessel. Each molecule, though small, has some momentum;
+but the enormous number of them in, say, a cubic
+inch, five hundred millions of millions of millions, and
+their relatively high translatory velocities,---say fifteen
+hundred feet per second, gives them momentum which,
+when spent upon the side of the vessel, gives a pressure
+equal to about fifteen pounds per square inch. If one
+were to hold up a shield against which many balls were
+thrown per second, he would need to brace himself to
+withstand the pressure that would appear to be constant.
+
+If the gas be heated the molecules have increased
+amplitude of vibration, and they rebound from each
+other with greater velocity, and strike the side with
+more momentum, and hence the pressure is greater.
+As the pressure is proportional to the absolute temperature,
+it is plain there could be no pressure if there
+was no vibratory motion. If the density of the gas
+be increased by adding more molecules per cubic inch,
+there must a greater number of them strike upon the
+sides of the vessel in a second, which will increase the
+pressure, that is, the pressure varies as the density.
+
+When it is said that gases have a tendency to expand,
+or that they exhibit a repulsive action, all that is signified
+is this; as elastic bodies, the molecules rebound
+after impact, and continue on in their direction, according
+to the first law of motion, until otherwise obstructed.
+When a ball rebounds from the side of the house it
+has been thrown against, it is not because there is any
+repulsion between the ball and the house.
+\DPPageSep{137.png}{125}%
+\index{Boiling-point pressure}%
+
+
+\Section{EFFECT OF PRESSURE UPON BOILING AND FUSION.}
+
+When it is said that the boiling-point of water is~$212°$,
+it is to be understood that the pressure of the air
+upon the surface of the water is fifteen pounds per
+square inch. At elevated places water boils at a much
+lower temperature; and when in a tight vessel, like the
+boilers of steam-engines, the pressure of the steam
+affects its boiling-point in the opposite way, raising it.
+Thus at twenty pounds steam pressure, the temperature
+required to boil water is~$228°$, at sixty pounds it is~$291°$,
+at ninety pounds~$319°$, and at the high pressures
+employed in locomotives of one hundred and fifty pounds
+or more to the square inch, the temperature of the
+steam and water is $360°$~or more. As one goes down
+into a mine the pressure of the air becomes greater,
+and higher temperature is needed to boil water. The
+explanation of this phenomenon is that the heated molecules
+of the liquid are bumping against each other in
+all directions, but the surface molecules can receive
+such bumps only from below and on their sides. If
+there were no molecules above to beat downwards, the
+surface molecules would fly rapidly up into the free
+space, which would be what we call a vacuum. This
+escape of the surface molecules of a liquid into the
+space above is called evaporation, and the higher the
+temperature of the liquid the harder the bumps, and
+the more will be flipped away from the liquid and
+become free rovers, having a long, free path. When,
+however, the gaseous particles are numerous and strike
+back upon the surface, that is, when there is a gaseous
+\DPPageSep{138.png}{126}%
+\index{Earth, solidity of}%
+pressure upon the surface, the surface molecules are
+prevented from rising, that is to say, evaporation cannot
+go on so fast, boiling is prevented until more energy is
+given to the water, and that means a higher temperature.
+
+The melting-point of substances is likewise affected
+by the pressure to which they are subject, and increasing
+the pressure increases the temperature needed to
+fuse them. Such small variations of pressure as only
+a few pounds per square inch do not make much difference,
+but pressure measured by tons per square inch
+makes a great deal. The condition of the interior of
+the earth appears to depend upon this as a most important
+factor. As one goes beneath the surface of the
+earth in mines and tunnels, it is observed that the temperature
+rises about one degree for every fifty or sixty feet
+of descent; and it was formerly inferred from this that at
+the depth of a few miles a temperature would be reached
+high enough to melt the most refractory bodies, and hence
+the interior of the earth was probably in a fused state
+while the crust was relatively thin. Such a view took
+no account of the effect of pressure upon the state of
+bodies. At the depth of a mile of water the pressure
+must be equal to $62.5×5280=330000$ pounds per
+square foot, and as rock is $2\frac{1}{2}$~times\DPnote{** PP: Slant fraction in original} the weight of
+water, the pressure must be $825000$ pounds, or over
+four hundred tons; and at five, ten, or a hundred miles,
+it is obvious the pressure is correspondingly greater.
+A body that at the surface of the earth would melt at any
+assignable temperature would require a much higher
+temperature to fuse when subjected to such enormous
+\DPPageSep{139.png}{127}%
+\index{Temperature, maximum}%
+pressure. It appears that the pressure increases faster
+than the observed temperature; and hence the earth
+must be solid to the centre, instead of being liquid as
+formerly supposed. This makes it appear that the
+phenomena of volcanoes are only local, and do not indicate
+\index{Volcanoes}%
+any general melted condition of the earth. If a
+body that would melt at a thousand degrees on the surface
+of the earth be subject to such pressure that it is
+not melted when its temperature is two thousand
+degrees, then, if the pressure be suddenly removed
+from it, the heat it has will instantly liquefy it. This
+may be the condition at the base of volcanoes, where
+shrinkage of the earth's crust in some direction may
+relieve the pressure in some other direction; and a
+large mass of heated material may become liquid, expanding
+in volume, and overflow in any direction where
+there is a vent, and this would be called a volcanic
+eruption.
+
+\Section{MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE.}
+
+We have considered the condition called absolute
+zero, wherein the molecules have no vibratory motion
+whatever; and it has also been pointed out, and it is
+generally agreed, that the temperature of a body varies
+as the square of its amplitude of molecular vibration.
+
+It has often been assumed in treating of high temperatures,
+such as that of the sun for instance, that
+there is no limit to the temperature to which matter
+can be raised. So some have estimated the temperature
+of the sun to be several millions of degrees; but
+a consideration of the factors involved will show such a
+\DPPageSep{140.png}{128}%
+conclusion to be impossible, for the dimensions and
+form of a body set a limit to the amplitude it can have.
+A tuning-fork cannot have its prongs vibrate beyond
+the limit where its prongs touch each other, and a
+vibrating ring cannot have an amplitude greater than
+one-fourth its circumference; and this degree is only
+possible to a mathematical circle having no thickness.
+Make a ring of a piece of twine, and elongate any
+diameter until the opposite sides touch, then move the
+middle points through a similar distance, and it will be
+seen that the limit will be equal to a quadrant of the
+circle; but if the ring be a thick one, say made of rope,
+it would be less than that, and how much less will
+depend upon the relative thickness of the rope to the
+diameter of the ring. If the thickness of the rope
+were one-fourth the diameter of the ring, then the
+amplitude could be but one-half the quadrant, and so
+on. Now, the atoms of matter have a definite size, and
+no one has ventured to suggest that they were variable
+in size in any degree; and one may, therefore, compute
+the greatest amplitude such a body could have, whether
+it were a circle or a hollow sphere without thickness.
+If the diameter be as before stated, one fifty-millionth
+of an inch, calculation shows that the greatest amplitude
+it could have would be about one sixty-four-millionth
+of an inch. This, multiplied by the number of
+vibrations it makes per second, will give the equivalent
+velocity from which its energy can be calculated. On
+\Pageref{page}{67}, it is shown that the velocity of a vibrating
+atom, if the amplitude be one-half of the diameter,
+will be about eighty miles a second. If the amplitude
+\DPPageSep{141.png}{129}%
+be equal in measure to the quadrant, as is here supposed,
+this velocity would be not far from a hundred
+miles per second, and the energy represented by that
+velocity would be the utmost energy of heat, or highest
+temperature that the body could have. The pressure
+of gases enables one to determine the velocity of
+the particles; and when this is known at a given temperature,
+the temperature at any other velocity may be
+computed.
+
+The statement that atoms and molecules can have a
+maximum temperature must not be understood to imply
+that the energy they can have is fixed at that limit,
+because aside from their temperature energy, represented
+by their vibratory motion, they can have any
+assignable translatory velocity in addition. But it does
+imply that ether waves, arising from temperature,
+have a fixed limit for each element; and such radiant
+energy from a given source cannot be transmitted beyond
+a certain rate, because its amplitude has a limit,
+so that whatever actual energy the sun as a whole may
+have, it cannot lose that energy by radiation faster than
+an assignable rate.
+
+This has an important bearing upon the question of
+the age of the sun. Computations have been made of
+the length of time the sun can have been giving out
+its energy, on the assumption that the sun is a cooling
+body, and that it was formerly much hotter than it is
+now. If the above statements are correct, the probability
+is that the sun is as hot now as it ever was, and
+that its rate of loss of heat by radiation has not been
+greatly different from what it is to-day; so, instead of
+\DPPageSep{142.png}{130}%
+being only fifteen or twenty millions of years old, it
+may be very much more.
+
+As the temperature of a body represents its molecular
+energy, and is measured by $\dfrac{mv^2}{2}$, it follows that if two
+different kinds of molecules, such as hydrogen and
+oxygen, have the same temperature, they will have the
+same amount of energy; but the mass of an oxygen
+molecule is sixteen times greater than the mass of a
+hydrogen molecule. In an equal weight of the two
+there will be sixteen times more molecules of hydrogen
+than of oxygen, and therefore the hydrogen will have
+sixteen times the energy of the oxygen at the same
+temperature. To produce a rise of temperature of one
+degree in a pound, or any given weight of hydrogen,
+would require sixteen times as much heat as the same
+weight of oxygen would need. This difference in
+thermal capacity of different substances is called their
+specific heat. In general, the lighter the molecules
+\index{Specific heat}%
+that make up a substance, the more numerous must
+they be to make up a given mass, and the higher will
+be its specific heat; i.e., the more heat must be expended
+upon it to produce a given rise in its temperature.
+The specific heat of water is chosen as a standard
+and is unity, as it is found to require more heat to
+raise a given weight of it one degree than any other
+substance. One heat unit will raise the temperature
+of a pound of it one degree; all other substances
+require but a fraction of this. From what is said, it
+appears that the specific heat of an element varies
+inversely as its atomic weight. The specific heat of
+\DPPageSep{143.png}{131}%
+\index{Dissociations}%
+a substance determines the temperature it will attain
+when a definite quantity of heat is supplied to it. If
+a pound of hydrogen and eight pounds of oxygen are
+exploded together, and not allowed to expand in volume,
+$51444$ heat units calories are produced. The $51444$
+heat units would be divided among nine pounds of
+water vapor, that has a specific heat under such conditions
+of~$.37$. The temperature attained would be
+$\dfrac{51444}{9×.37}=15450°$. This temperature is much higher
+than the limit of possible combination of the two
+gases, which, at about~$3000°$, are unable to combine, so
+such an action could not take place any faster than the
+parts could cool down to the latter temperature. If
+the mixture be allowed to expand, the temperature of~$3000°$
+may not be reached, and the action of the whole
+is so rapid it is called an explosion.
+
+\Section{DISSOCIATION.}
+
+When compound molecules are broken up into their
+elementary constituents in any manner, the process is
+called dissociation. It may be effected by electrical
+action, as when water is decomposed by it, or by chemical
+action, as when wood is decomposed under water,
+setting the carbon free; but heat is competent to effect
+the same end. At the temperature of about~$3000°$ the
+existence of water is impossible, as the elements cannot
+stay united, and the reason is obvious. Whatever the
+nature of the attraction that holds atoms together in
+chemical compounds, if the elementary atoms are themselves
+in brisk vibratory motion, as we know they are,
+\DPPageSep{144.png}{132}%
+\index{Matter, effect of temperature upon}%
+they must be straining their bonds continually to separate;
+and when the amplitude of such motion reaches a
+certain maximum, the impacts are so violent as to make
+the atoms rebound out of each other's neighborhood,
+and thus prevent cohesion. The atoms then either
+enter into new combinations with others, if possible,
+and if not they remain as gaseous particles, and subject
+to the laws of gases.
+
+If one starts with a piece of ice and applies heat it
+melts, and we call the liquid water. Apply more heat
+and the water becomes steam, in which the individual
+molecules are no longer able to cohere, because of their
+energetic motions; but each molecule remains intact,
+having a long free path, for a cubic inch of water
+becomes nearly a cubic foot of steam under ordinary
+air pressure. If still more heat be applied, the molecules
+become more and more unstable until they too
+are broken up in the same way and for the same reason
+that the solid and the liquid forms were. When it is
+no longer possible for hydrogen and oxygen to combine,
+it is still possible for the atoms of each to combine
+with each other, hydrogen with hydrogen and oxygen
+with oxygen, forming elementary molecules \textit{H H}, and
+\textit{O O}; but if a still higher temperature be applied, even
+this combination becomes impossible, and the atoms
+themselves become free rovers and individually independent.
+Thus it is seen that the different states
+of matter depend altogether upon temperature. At
+absolute zero there can be no such thing as a gas, for
+the molecules would have no individual vibrations and
+therefore no free paths. They would probably fall to
+\DPPageSep{145.png}{133}%
+the bottom of the vessel and remain quiescent. It is
+also probable that both liquids and solids too would
+cease to exist, not that matter would be annihilated, but
+a solid, a liquid, and a gas are simply each a bundle of
+physical properties that depend mostly upon temperature,
+and those properties would probably disappear
+with the disappearance of the conditions upon which
+they depended.
+%\DPPageSep{146.png}{134}%
+
+
+\Chapter{VII}{Ether Waves}{134}
+
+\index{Ether waves}%
+\index{Ether wave qualities}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+
+It has already been stated in what has preceded this
+that translational motions of matter are not competent
+to originate ether waves, and that vibratory motions
+of both atoms and molecules can originate them. A
+consideration of the origin, transmission, and effects of
+such ether waves constitutes the subject-matter of what
+is called the science of light. The word ``light'' is
+commonly used to signify that agency in nature which
+is capable of affecting the eye and causes vision, or the
+sensation of sight, and until within a very few years
+has been supposed to be a peculiar kind of a wave
+motion in the ether quite distinct from other waves
+known to exist which were competent to produce heating
+and chemical effects, so such waves as were known
+from their effects were called heat waves, light waves,
+and actinic or chemical waves, according as they heated
+bodies, produced light, or brought about chemical reactions.
+These three sorts of waves were supposed to
+coexist generally, but were capable of being separated
+from each other so there could be a beam of either
+without the others. This is now known to be a mistaken
+view, for what a given ether wave will do depends
+upon what it falls on rather than on its own peculiarity.
+The same waves that fall upon the eye and produce the
+sensation of sight will heat other kinds of matter, and
+\DPPageSep{147.png}{135}%
+\index{Ether waves, their source}%
+\index{Light, a sensation}%
+if they fall upon a surface of molecules that are unstable,
+that is, in which the atoms that make up the molecules
+are not strongly cohesive, the molecules are
+disrupted by the waves, and the atoms enter into new
+combinations, and this process is called a chemical process;
+and while it is true that some waves will not produce
+vision, there are none that will not produce both
+heating and chemical effects, so there is no such distinction
+among ether waves as was supposed, and this
+leads to another conclusion also; viz., if there is no
+such distinction between waves, then there is no such
+thing as light at all, unless we classify all rays as light,
+whether they can produce sight or not, which is sometimes
+done to save explanations, but it leads to the
+anomaly that there is such a thing as dark light, which
+is absurd. There will be no difficulty whatever if light
+be defined as a sensation merely, and the waves competent
+to produce the sensation be called visual waves.
+Up to the present time, however, the old terminology
+is quite generally adhered to in spite of the difficulty of
+reconciling the old signification with the new knowledge.
+There is no single word that signifies ether
+waves in general, and independent of the effects that
+may be produced in specific cases, and for that reason
+this term has been adopted. The word ``light'' is
+entirely inadequate, and likely to mislead one not well
+versed in the phenomena.
+
+\Section{ORIGIN OF ETHER WAVES.}
+
+The source of ether waves of all degrees whatever
+is the vibratory motions of atoms and molecules as distinguished
+\DPPageSep{148.png}{136}%
+\index{Elements}%
+from their translatory, or free-path motions,
+but their rates of vibration are determined by their
+atomic weights. An atom of hydrogen, for instance,
+has a different rate from oxygen, for the same reason
+that two tuning-forks, though made precisely alike,
+would have different rates if one were made of steel
+and the other of aluminium. If they have different
+rates, then the number of waves produced by them per
+second will be different, and as all waves travel in the
+ether with the same speed, namely, $186000$ miles per
+second, the length of the waves produced by them
+must be different.
+
+There are about seventy different elementary atoms,
+each setting up its characteristic waves in the ether all
+the time. It is to be remembered that all atoms and
+molecules are always to be considered as hot bodies;
+that is, bodies having some temperature, and mostly
+a long way above absolute zero; and also that their
+energy of this kind may be spent upon the ether. If
+the waves from one molecule have more energy than
+those given off by a second molecule upon which they
+fall, the second one absorbs some of it so as to have its
+own temperature raised until it is the same as the other;
+that is, until the energy given off by them both is
+equal. And this is universally true. Matter is continually
+exchanging energy in this way, always tending to
+bring about equality of temperature. But the number
+of vibrations a body makes does not need to be the
+same as that of another body in order to possess the
+same amount of energy, for the energy depends upon
+both mass and velocity. If the mass be small, the
+\DPPageSep{149.png}{137}%
+velocity must be greater, and \emph{vice versa}. And thus it
+is that the seventy elements that make up the kinds of
+matter we know are everywhere and at all times setting
+up ether waves, each kind its particular rates, when not
+otherwise interfered with.
+
+There is, however, a qualification that must be added
+that has a high degree of scientific importance. Every
+elementary substance is vibrating at several rates at the
+same time, as do piano-strings, bells, and musical instruments
+in general. Every particular rate of vibration
+produces its own waves, and thus each atom and
+molecule is continually producing, when not interfered
+with, its own characteristic set of waves. This must
+make the ether waves from the different kinds of matter
+exceedingly complex, and disentangling them correspondingly
+difficult; yet it has been done.
+
+When we look at luminous bodies, like the sun or
+stars, or flames, or gas, they seem to differ from each
+\index{Flames}%
+other in brightness and sometimes in color, as is seen
+in fireworks. A flame of alcohol has a bluish tint, a
+little salt in it makes it yellow, some lithium makes it
+red, and copper, green or bluish, while sunlight is white,
+as is the electric light. If one looks through a common
+prism at the landscape the edges of objects appear in
+rainbow tints, and with the colors arranged in the same
+order, while at the same time the shape of things is
+more or less distorted. If a beam of sunlight be sent
+directly through such a prism, a patch of colors may be
+seen on the floor or wall, and this is called a solar
+spectrum; and if this light of different tints has its
+wave length measured, it appears that the red light has
+\DPPageSep{150.png}{138}%
+a wave length of about the one forty-thousandth of an
+inch, and the violet light at the other extreme a wave
+length of about the one sixty-thousandth of an inch,
+while the intermediate tints range regularly from the
+one to the other. There is in this spectrum that can
+be seen an almost infinite number of wave lengths;
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{150a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{8}{Diag.\ 8.---Visible Solar Spectrum.}
+ \index{Spectrum, solar}%
+\end{figure}
+there is no break among them apparently. The same
+thing holds true of a spectrum produced by letting the
+light from a lamp or candle go through the same prism:
+\index{Prism}%
+the tints, their order, and their wave lengths are found
+to be the same. The prism then receives ether waves
+of any or all wave lengths, and separates or disperses
+them in the order of their wave lengths. In doing this
+it deflects the longer waves less than it does the shorter
+ones. The deflection of the waves from their original
+course is called \emph{refraction}, and the separation from each
+\index{Refraction}%
+other so as to produce the spectrum is called \emph{dispersion}.
+\index{Dispersion}%
+A prism effects both at the same time, and thus enables
+one to isolate at will any particular tint or part of the
+spectrum; and if one takes a single narrow portion in
+any such spectrum, he has a bundle of light rays of
+uniform wave lengths, and he may then determine their
+value. In this way the wave lengths of the different
+colored parts of the spectrum of sunlight have been
+found to be as follows:---
+\DPPageSep{151.png}{139}%
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{ll<{\qquad\qquad}l}
+Red, & about & $39000$ to the inch
+\\
+Orange, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $41000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Yellow, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $44000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Green, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $47000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Blue, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $51000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Indigo, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $54000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Violet, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $57000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+\multicolumn{2}{l}{Extreme visible, about} & $60000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+A spectroscope is an instrument composed of a prism
+\index{Spectroscope}%
+mounted between two tubes, one of them having an
+adjustable slot for the light to be examined to pass
+through on its way to the prism, the other being a short
+telescope to magnify somewhat the image of the
+spectrum that %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{151a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{9}{Diag.\ 9.---Spectroscope.}
+\end{figure}
+it may the better be seen. With this,
+light from any source may be examined. Light made
+up of all wave lengths that can be seen shows as
+a complete spectrum, while any light made up of but
+a part of these gives a corresponding incomplete
+spectrum. The flame of an alcohol lamp, or a Bunsen
+\DPPageSep{152.png}{140}%
+\index{Spectrum analysis}%
+gas-flame, gives but little brightness and not much to
+produce a spectrum; but a little salt in the flame gives
+to it a bright yellow tint, and shows in the spectroscope
+a single narrow band of yellow light in the same place
+as the yellow seen in sunlight, and therefore having the
+same wave length. Such a beam made up of waves of
+one wave length is called homogeneous light. This
+sodium light has a wave length of about the one forty-four-thousandth
+of an inch. With other more refined
+methods, which cannot be described here, sodium is
+found to have other wave lengths beyond both the red
+and blue ends, and which cannot be detected by the
+eye alone. Hydrogen, another element, gives a bright
+red line and a blue line that are easily seen; and several
+others may be detected with more delicate apparatus.
+In this manner all the elements have been attentively
+studied during the past thirty years, and many treatises
+may be found that give full particulars of the processes
+and results. The substance of knowledge obtained by
+the study of the spectra of the elements may be briefly
+stated to be,---
+
+1st, Each element has its own vibratory rates at
+a given temperature, and sets up corresponding ether
+waves; some of these can be seen, and others require
+more complicated apparatus to discover.
+
+2d, In order that the characteristic vibrations of any
+atoms or molecules may take place, it is necessary that
+they be allowed a free path to vibrate in; in other words,
+they need be in the gaseous state. If they be crowded
+together, as they are in solids and liquids, they have no
+chance to vibrate without interference. A pailful of
+\DPPageSep{153.png}{141}%
+school-bells might make a jangling noise, but would give
+no particular pitch or characteristic sound of any of the
+bells, and only when not interfered with for a part of the
+time at least could one give out its true sound. This
+gaseous state is generally obtained by igniting in flames
+or by the electric spark the substance to be examined.
+In an electric arc all substances are volatilized, and may
+be then studied with the spectroscope to great advantage.
+Sometimes substances that remain in the gaseous
+state at ordinary temperatures, such as hydrogen, oxygen,
+chlorine, etc., are hermetically sealed in glass tubes,
+after rarefication, in order to obtain long free paths, and
+are lighted up by means of electric discharges through
+them.
+
+3d, On account of the lack of vibratory freedom, the
+molecules of solids and liquids give out vibrations of all
+wave lengths, for every partial and incompleted movement
+disturbs the ether; and there are all degrees of
+these, but the energy of the shorter ones is rarely great
+enough to affect the eye, and hence are not visible at
+ordinary temperatures. If a body like a cannon-ball be
+gradually heated in the dark, it will presently begin to
+glow with a dim red tint. If looked at through the
+spectroscope, only red light on the extreme red border
+can be seen. As the temperature rises, additional
+shorter waves appear, and the spectrum broadens to the
+orange, then the yellow, and so on; the ones already
+showing growing brighter meanwhile, until the ball is
+in a bright glow, and a full continuous spectrum is produced.
+As the ball cools, the reverse holds true; and
+the violet waves are the first to disappear, then the blue,
+\DPPageSep{154.png}{142}%
+and lastly the red vanishes from sight. Still the ball is
+much too hot to safely touch, and continues to cool by
+giving off ether waves differing from the rest only in
+being too long to affect the eye. They still are refracted
+by the prism, and an invisible spectrum is produced,
+and this spectrum has been traced out to ten
+times the length of the visible spectrum.
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{154a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{10}{Diag.\ 10.---Complete Solar Spectrum.}
+\end{figure}
+
+The sun, an electric arc, and other solid hot bodies,
+\index{Spectrum, solar}%
+give out similar long, invisible spectra.
+
+In like manner, where the body is white-hot, and giving
+out the shortest waves the eye can see, there can still
+be found, a long way beyond that limit, waves that can
+do photographic work, which is but a kind of molecular
+dissociation.
+
+4th, Where waves of a given length are made to pass
+through a gas having similar vibratory rates, or capable
+of producing waves of the same length, the molecules
+of the latter will absorb such waves, and therefore stop
+their progress, especially if they have more energy than
+the waves the absorbing gas can give out. So if sunlight
+containing the same yellow light as that of sodium
+gas be made to pass through the latter, it will be stopped;
+and if this be done where there is a spectrum of sunlight,
+the yellow will be cut out from it, and there will be
+but a black line instead. This is called gaseous absorption,
+\index{Gaseous absorption}%
+and is an illustration of what was said a little way
+\DPPageSep{155.png}{143}%
+\index{Sun, its structure}%
+back about the exchange of energy always going on.
+The absorbing power of a gas has a significance like its
+radiations, and indicates its presence as well.
+
+The yellow light of sodium gas has a definite place
+in the spectrum; and hence if one perceives those wave
+lengths in a gaseous spectrum, he knows that sodium
+must be present in a state of incandescence, giving rise
+to the waves. But if the light from a white-hot cannon-ball
+were to be sent through that same vapor, and afterwards
+examined with a prism, the yellow light would be
+absent, and the absence would still proclaim the existence
+of sodium vapor.
+
+Hence, if an incandescent body gives a continuous
+spectrum, it must be a solid or a liquid; the molecules
+must be so compact that the individual vibrations are
+prevented, and only irregular ones can be made. If a
+discontinuous but bright line spectrum is shown, the
+matter must be in a gaseous state, and the molecules
+have free path.
+
+If a bright spectrum have black spaces or bands
+across it, there is indicated a solid or liquid incandescent
+body shining through gas that acts by absorption
+upon it, and thus both the solid and gaseous conditions
+are detected, as well as the nature of the substance in
+the gaseous state.
+
+This knowledge has been applied to the discovery of
+the substance and condition of the sun and other celestial
+bodies, and it is concluded that the sun has a solid
+or liquid surface as a shell to a gaseous interior, and
+that the atmosphere of it consists of the various
+elements that make up the body of the sun in so highly
+\DPPageSep{156.png}{144}%
+\index{Jupiter, temperature of}%
+\index{Mars, atmosphere of}%
+\index{Saturn, temperature of}%
+heated a condition as to keep them in a vaporous or
+gaseous state. The characteristic spectroscopic lines of
+about forty elements have been found there. Some of
+the elements have a very large number of spectroscopic
+lines. Iron, for instance, has several hundred lines.
+Hydrogen is particularly abundant. Perhaps the most
+important discovery due to the spectroscope has been
+this: that there are a very large number of gaseous
+bodies, called nebulæ, in the heavens; some of these fill
+immense spaces; they are in a condensing state, and
+all of them are mostly made up of hydrogen. This
+discovery gave an additional probability to the nebula
+theory of the origin of the solar system, for it showed
+that process in its various stages in more distant
+parts of space: and in addition to that, it has led to
+the surmise that in some way some of those we now
+call elements are really compounds of more elementary
+substances, probably hydrogen; but that is a speculation
+merely, for there is no other than such spectroscopic
+evidence that anything like transmutation of what we
+call elements into others can take place.
+
+The spectroscopic examination of the other members
+of the solar system has shown that Mars has an
+atmosphere like ours, holding watery vapor in it;
+that Jupiter is red-hot; that the temperature of Saturn
+is probably much too high for any such living things
+as exist on this earth---and in this way has answered
+the question so interesting to most thoughtful persons
+as to whether the planets are inhabited or not. Jupiter
+certainly cannot be inhabited by any such beings as we
+are, for the temperature would destroy all organic things.
+\DPPageSep{157.png}{145}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+\index{Stars, their motions}%
+
+Velocities of translation can also be measured when
+as high as two miles a second or more, by the displacement
+of spectroscopic lines towards one or the other
+end of the spectrum. If a star is approaching us, the
+wave lengths are shortened a small quantity, and that
+changes the position of a line towards the blue end,
+while recession makes it longer and moves it towards
+the red end, so it has been found that Sirius is receding
+\index{Sirius}%
+at the rate of nineteen miles per second; that Arcturus
+\index{Arcturus}%
+is coming towards us at the rate of sixty miles
+per second. In like manner is shown that the sun, and
+with him the whole solar system, is travelling in the
+direction of the constellation Hercules at the probable
+rate of about sixteen miles per second.
+
+Now, all this presupposes that the principles established
+in the laboratory for substances there investigated
+are applicable wherever such matter exists;
+for instance, that the spectrum of sodium and of hydrogen
+and iron, which depends upon temperature and
+pressure, is as reliable if the light comes from a body
+a million miles or a thousand million miles away as if it
+came from only one mile or a foot distant. If it be
+thus widely applicable, then do we have the best of
+testimony that matter, its conditions, and its laws are
+the same everywhere, and that the earth is a fair specimen
+of the rest of the universe.
+
+
+\Section{OTHER PHENOMENA OF ETHER WAVES.}
+
+Whenever a line of ether waves---which is generally
+called a ray, whatever the wave length may be---falls
+\DPPageSep{158.png}{146}%
+upon matter, the ray may be either absorbed, transmitted,
+or reflected. Neither of these results takes
+place singly in any case. There is no known body, for
+instance, that can wholly absorb all the rays that fall
+upon it, nor wholly transmit or reflect them. If a body
+should be able to absorb all the rays that fall upon it,
+we should not be able to see it unless itself were a self-luminous
+body, for we only see other than self-luminous
+objects by means of the light reflected from them,
+and such a body would reflect no light, and hence could
+not be visible.
+
+Bodies which absorb most of the rays that fall upon
+them we call black and opaque; that is, a body that
+reflects but a small portion of the waves that are incident
+upon it is a dark or black body, because we see
+but little of it. If it reflected none at all, it would be
+quite invisible. In like manner, a perfectly transparent
+body would be one that would neither absorb nor
+reflect any rays, and for that reason would be quite as
+invisible as space itself. The air is perhaps as near an
+approach to perfect transparency as anything that can be
+\index{Transparency}%
+named; yet if it reflected no rays at all, there would be
+nothing of the diffused light that is now so plentiful on
+the clearest day, but there would be only what would
+come direct to us from the sun or other luminous body.
+We call clear glass and water transparent because objects
+can be plainly seen through them; and a sheet of hard
+black rubber we call opaque, for nothing whatever can
+be seen through it, nevertheless it has been shown
+that waves longer than those that affect the eye, go
+through such hard rubber as easily as the shorter ones
+\DPPageSep{159.png}{147}%
+we call light go through glass, hence transparency and
+opacity are terms only relative to particular kinds of
+waves. All kinds of matter reflect more or less of the
+waves that fall upon it. This reflection is merely the
+\index{Reflection}%
+change in direction of the ray; but it always follows a
+definite law, keeping to its original plane, and making
+the angle of reflection equal to the incident angle.
+The surfaces of most bodies are very rough, and the
+rays are reflected in all directions, because the points
+upon the surface face in so many ways. This will
+be obvious to one who looks at the surface of paper or
+of wood with a magnifying-glass. The smoother a surface
+is made, the nearer will all the incident rays take
+the same direction on reflection. Mirrors are thus
+\index{Mirrors}%
+made of smooth glass or metallic surfaces, and are
+plane, convex, or concave; but whether they are made
+with plane or curved surface, the rays reflected always
+follow the above law.
+
+
+\Section{REFRACTION.}
+\index{Refraction}%
+
+So long as ether waves fall perpendicularly upon any
+surface of any kind of matter, the rays go straight on
+into it if they be not reflected or absorbed at the surface;
+there is no change in the direction, but the velocity of
+transmission is less in all kinds of matter than it is in
+the ether. In glass it is only about two-thirds as fast,
+and in water about three-fourths. When the ray meets
+the surface at an angle, it is bent out of its course more
+or less, depending upon the kind of material it falls
+upon, and also the angle at which it meets it. This
+change of direction, when entering a new medium, is
+\DPPageSep{160.png}{148}%
+called refraction, and this property is possessed by all
+kinds of matter, solid as well as liquid and gas. The
+refraction for a given angle of incidence is more for a
+liquid than for a gas, more for a solid like glass than for
+water or other liquids, and more for a diamond than for
+any other known substance. The same rule that obtains
+when the waves enter a medium, holds when it leaves
+it; the direction it will now take will depend upon the
+angle the rays make with that surface and the character
+of the medium into which it enters. Thus, if a
+ray meets a piece of plain glass at an angle, say, of~$45°$,
+some of it will be reflected, making an angle of~$90°$
+with the incident ray, and some of it will be refracted
+into it, making an angle with the original direction, and
+continue on in a straight line until it meets the next
+surface, when it will again assume its original direction:
+but when the second surface is not parallel with the
+first, as is the case with the prism, the direction may
+depart still more from the original; and the shorter the
+wave length, the more the deflection. It is this property
+that is made use of in spectroscopes, microscopes,
+and telescopes. A lens has one or both surfaces
+curved, so as to be convex or concave, depending upon
+the use it is to be put to,---a convex glass converging
+the rays, and a concave one separating them,---and
+almost any degree of either of these may be obtained
+by proper curvature.
+
+Both microscopes and telescopes are so common, and
+descriptions of them are to be found in so many places,
+that they need not be described here. The inquiry is
+often made, why still more powerful microscopes and
+\DPPageSep{161.png}{149}%
+\index{Microscope, magnifying powers}%
+telescopes are not made so as to reveal the very smallest
+and the most distant thing. The utility of a
+microscope depends upon how plainly it is able to
+make minute objects visible; and the more a given one
+magnifies an object, the smaller the portion that can be
+seen and the less light is available for the purpose, and
+when the objects are so small as the few thousandths
+of an inch, the light waves interfere with each other at
+the edges, and produce colored fringes that cannot be
+got rid of altogether, and very small objects become
+indistinct for that reason. Microscope lenses are
+marked as $1$~inch, $\dfrac{1}{2}$~inch, $\dfrac{1}{10}$~inch, and so on, meaning
+by the fraction the approximate distance it must be
+brought to the object in order that the latter may be
+seen. The higher the power, the shorter this distance.
+A one-tenth inch objective may magnify an object a
+thousand diameters and perhaps more, so that a blood
+corpuscle having a diameter of only one three-thousandth
+of an inch may appear about three-tenths of an
+inch in diameter, and the details of its coarser structure
+may be very well seen; but if there be a minute
+point upon it, still indistinct because it is minute, and
+a still greater magnifying power required to see it, and a
+$\dfrac{1}{20}$~objective be taken, the actual magnifying power
+may be five thousand diameters. But now one is
+approaching the dimensions of wave lengths themselves,
+and the agent necessary for observing introduces
+its own complications, producing distortions and
+color fringes about the point to be studied, and no way
+\DPPageSep{162.png}{150}%
+has been found of obviating this. Objectives have
+been made having a focal length of only the $\dfrac{1}{50}$~of an
+inch and one having only the~$\dfrac{1}{75}$, but no work of any
+importance has ever been done with them. The best
+of the microscopic work has been done with lenses that
+magnify no more than one thousand diameters. It is
+said that the best microscopes will show an object that
+is no more than about the one hundred-thousandth of
+an inch in diameter, but it appears simply as a point or
+a line, and no details of its structure can be seen.
+Fine rulings upon glass have been made that are known
+to have this degree of fineness, because the mechanism
+that rules them can be gauged to that degree; but
+many persons cannot see these in a microscope, though
+others can. So within the limits of the visible not a
+little depends upon the acuteness of vision, and there
+is a great difference among individuals in this respect.
+On account of the properties of the ether waves themselves
+in their relations to each other, it does not
+appear probable that much improvement is possible to
+the microscope. This does not imply that we may not
+know more of the minute structure of bodies than we
+do now, for there are other sources of knowledge of
+minute quantities than simply direct eyesight, which
+are just as reliable, perhaps more so. A good chemical
+balance will weigh to the millionth part of the load.
+Whitworth showed that it was possible to measure to
+the millionth of an inch by touch. The spectroscope
+will indicate the millionth of a grain by the tint of the
+\DPPageSep{163.png}{151}%
+gas flame, and the color of a drop of water is appreciably
+changed by the one three-millionth of a grain of
+fuschine. Some substances, like essential oils, sulphuretted
+hydrogen, and the odors of flowers, can be
+perceived when the quantity is certainly less than the
+fifty-millionth of a grain.
+
+Any day may bring tidings of new instrumentalities
+that help in the solutions of the interesting questions
+concerning molecular structure that are now quite out
+of our reach. Let it be granted that the problems are
+altogether physical ones, such as are justified by the
+known mechanical relations of energy, and one may
+wait with patience. Let one assume that some or any
+of them are not mechanical, and he not only is in danger
+of having to revise his judgment in some degree any
+day, but he reasons against the significance of all the
+knowledge we have of matter and its energy.
+
+The larger a lens is the more light can go through it:
+a lens two feet in diameter will let four times as much
+light through it as one only one foot in diameter. As
+remote objects, like the distant stars, appear dim on
+account of their great distance, it becomes needful to
+concentrate the light from a much larger area than that
+of the pupil of the eye. If the pupil be one-tenth of an
+inch in diameter, a certain amount of light from a star
+may enter it. A lens one inch in diameter would concentrate
+at its focus $100$~times as much, and one a
+foot in diameter, $14400$~times more; and hence the
+object would appear so much brighter. Along with
+this apparent brightening of the star, it is apparently
+brought nearer and enlarged. There are limits to the
+\DPPageSep{164.png}{152}%
+size and useful magnifying power of telescopes as well
+as to those of microscopes. The magnifying power
+of telescopes depends very largely upon the eye-pieces
+used, and the shorter their focal length the more do
+they magnify. The large lens, called the objective,
+serves mostly to collect a large amount of light. It is to
+be kept in mind that the movements of bodies are magnified
+as much as their apparent dimensions, and when
+there are any movements of the body surveyed, or of
+the instrument itself, distinct vision becomes correspondingly
+difficult.
+
+With the telescope the chief trouble comes from
+movements of the air, which are rarely of uniform quality
+and motions. Not only its transparency, but its degrees
+of density caused by heat and wind, are varying all the
+time; and these seriously interfere with telescopic work.
+If a magnifying power of say~$100$ be employed, these
+disturbing causes are increased in proportion, and with a
+power of~$1000$ nothing can be distinctly seen. Suppose,
+however, the air be in best condition for observations,
+and a power of~$1000$ be put upon the moon. As
+the moon is about $240000$ miles away, this magnifying
+power would have the effect of bringing it $1000$~times
+nearer, or as it would appear to the eye if it were
+but $240$~miles away. Now, an object $240$~miles away
+can reveal no interesting details at all; anything much
+less than half a mile square could not be distinguished
+unless it were a very bright or very dark spot. Powers
+as high as~$8000$ have been used; and such a one would
+bring the surface of the moon as it would appear if it
+were about thirty miles distant, which might show a
+\DPPageSep{165.png}{153}%
+city, a large town, a lake, and the difference between
+field and woodland, yet nothing satisfactory was seen
+for the reasons mentioned, so for most astronomical
+work a magnifying power of only a few hundred is
+used; seldom more than five hundred. When large
+telescopes are set on elevated places like the Lick
+Telescope on Mt.~Hamilton in California, some of the
+troubles from disturbed air are obviated, and it is hoped
+something more may be learned about our nearer astronomic
+neighbors. But these large telescopes collect
+so much more light that stars so distant as to be quite
+invisible with smaller glasses become plainly visible
+with them. With the unaided eye no more than $5000$
+or $6000$~stars can be seen in the whole heavens, with
+an opera-glass as many as $100000$ become visible, while
+the Lick telescope, with an object-glass three feet in
+diameter, shows nearly $100,000000$. Each increase in
+the size of the telescope adds to the number of visible
+stars, and one cannot but wonder if their number be
+infinite, or if there be a boundary to the universe of
+matter. Though the visible boundary of our universe
+has been greatly extended by the invention of the telescope,
+nothing has been descried anywhere but matter
+and motion: there has been nothing added to our knowledge
+but the sense of bigness. Instead of only a few
+thousand of hot and flaming stars, there are hundreds
+of millions of them, made of the same kinds of matter,
+having the same kinds of motions, controlled by the
+same laws, and nothing animate in any of them more
+than in a bowlder in the wall. Clifford said he wished
+they were farther off. The problems of astronomy are
+\DPPageSep{166.png}{154}%
+\index{Space, navigation of}%
+interesting studies in mechanics, but are not inviting to
+those most interested in life and mind. Herschel and
+Chalmers and Dick and Mitchell are dead. The
+knowledge already gained has destroyed both their
+arguments and hopes, and has left the inhabitants of
+this earth the possessors of the universe, yet unable to
+take possession.
+
+If there are inhabitants in Mars they are as unable to
+traverse space as we are; and the possibility of our yet
+being able to do that is not half so unlikely as it seemed
+to be but a very few years ago, since it evidently requires
+for accomplishment but a directed reaction against
+the ether; and we already know how to produce the
+reaction by electrical means; and every point in space
+has the energy for transformation.
+
+It is generally agreed that the so-called attraction of
+a magnet for its armature is really due to the pressure
+of the ether upon the latter, and it may be as great as
+two hundred pounds to the square inch.
+
+An electro-magnet without an armature is therefore
+reacted upon by the ether to that degree. When this
+reaction can in any way be neutralized at one pole and
+not at the other, the ether reaction will push the magnet
+backwards, and the navigation of space will at once
+become mechanically possible.
+
+
+\Section{THE RADIOMETER.}
+\index{Radiometer}%
+
+It is a familiar enough fact that when sunshine falls
+upon a surface the latter becomes heated. In general,
+the darker the color of the surface the more rapidly %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.5in}{167a}
+ \Caption{12}{Diag.\ 12.---Radiometer.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+does
+the temperature rise; and some bodies, when thus exposed
+\DPPageSep{167.png}{155}%
+for some time, become unbearably hot. We are
+able to say that the surface molecules of such a body
+are in a brisk vibratory movement; that they have more
+energy than other bodies with less temperature. If one
+imagines the condition of things when the molecules of
+the air impinge upon such a heated surface, he will understand
+how they must bound away
+from it with greater velocity than
+they struck it with, and if with
+greater velocity, then with greater
+energy. As action and reaction are
+equal, it must kick back upon the
+surface as it leaves it, thus tending
+to make the surface move in the
+opposite direction; and a large number
+of such impacts must give a resultant
+backward pressure. If the
+surface be a small one, the increased
+pressure in the air in front will
+travel round to the other side at
+the rate of eleven hundred feet in a
+second in ordinary air; so the pressure
+will be equalized in a very short
+interval of time. If the air be rarefied
+in front of such surface to such a degree that the
+free path of the molecule is many times greater than
+its ordinary length, that pressure cannot get round
+nearly so fast, and there will consequently be a constant
+backward pressure, produced by the molecules that impinge
+upon it and become heated by contact with it.
+The pressure per square inch is very slight, as it is
+\DPPageSep{168.png}{156}%
+produced by a relatively small number of molecules;
+but it may be made apparent by mounting some disks,
+blackened on one side, upon a pivot in a glass bulb,
+and, after exhausting a large part of the air, hermetically
+sealing the bulb. Such a device is called a radiometer.
+When put where sunshine, or the light from
+the flame of a lamp or candle, or even the heat of the
+hand, may fall upon it, the vanes begin to rotate, the
+blackened side backing away from the source of the
+energy. This movement was at first interpreted as
+being due to the actual pressure produced by light
+waves, but further investigation showed that idea to be
+wrong. The movement comes from the transformation
+of the motions of ether waves, first into heat, and
+second into the translational mass motion observed.
+The radiometer is, therefore, a machine for transforming
+ether waves into visible mechanical motions.
+
+
+\Section{PHOTOGRAPHY.}
+\index{Photography}%
+
+It has already been explained how heat acts upon
+molecules, increasing the amplitude of the vibrations of
+the atoms that make them up, and, if carried to a sufficient
+degree, is able to quite destroy the molecular structure
+and enable the component atoms to enter into new
+combinations. The degree needed for this depends upon
+the kind of molecules. Some molecules are so stable
+that only the very highest temperature we can produce
+can break them up. Others are so feebly cohesive that
+the least touch will cause them to go to pieces, and
+sometimes with explosive violence, as is the case with
+what are called fulminates, compounds of nitrogen with
+\DPPageSep{169.png}{157}%
+silver or with mercury; and sometimes the same result
+is reached by ether waves, whose number per second is
+such as to set one of the ingredients into sympathetic
+vibration and thus decompose the compound, doing it
+at a slower rate than the others. Nearly all complex
+molecules are decomposable in this way, and the process
+is going on all the time in nature where there are organic
+things to act upon, but the process is usually
+slow.
+
+When shingles are first laid they have a fresh surface
+and new appearance, which is presently lost by
+the exposure. Take a freshly planed piece of soft
+pine or other white wood, and fasten to the surface a
+piece of paper cut into any shape or design,---a circle,
+a star, or the like,---and set the wood where the sun
+can shine on it for a few days. When the design is
+removed the figure will be plainly seen on the wood by
+the difference in tint between its surface and that part
+which the sun has shone upon. The latter is much
+darker. This is an example of photographic action,
+as is the color of fruit, etc.; for if a design is pasted
+upon a green apple, which is red when ripe, the design
+will protect the surface from the action of the light,
+and will therefore appear upon the apple in a light tint.
+Diagrams and letters may be fixed thus upon fruit of
+any kind. Discolorations of all sorts, due to ether
+waves or light, may properly be called photographic
+action, both fading and darkening, as when the skin
+becomes tanned. For practical purposes some compounds
+of silver are generally employed, because they
+are more sensitive to the action of visible waves than
+\DPPageSep{170.png}{158}%
+most other substances. They have the property of
+being easily disorganized by waves whose length
+ranges from about one forty-five-thousandth of an inch
+to those in the neighborhood of the seventy-thousandth
+of an inch, some of these being visible waves, the
+others being too short for visibility. When a surface is
+prepared with some one of the sensitive salts of silver,---generally
+the iodide or the bromide,---and a picture
+of an object produced by the lenses of the camera
+is allowed to fall upon it, the decomposing action is
+proportional to the amount of light and shade in the
+different parts; and, when the plate thus exposed is
+placed in certain chemical solutions called developers,
+the decomposition is completed and the products dissolved
+out, leaving a coating of pure silver, with a
+thickness proportional to the chemical action that has
+taken place. This gives, then, a correct likeness of
+the picture that was in the camera. Formerly it took
+a long time to produce such a picture, a person having
+to sit still for half an hour or more. More and more
+sensitive preparations were produced, until now a good
+picture can be taken in less than the thousandth of a
+second; and the practice of the art has become a great
+industry. There are many preparations in common
+use for taking such pictures, but nearly all of them
+have silver for the chief constituent. It may be
+remarked that silver compounds are remarkably unstable.
+Silver is not easily oxydized\DPnote{** [sic]}, for it remains
+untarnished for an indefinite time, as exemplified by
+coins and jewelry. But there are plenty of other compounds
+that may be used. Thus the common blue-print\DPnote{** Hyphenated across page, no other instances.}
+\DPPageSep{171.png}{159}%
+\index{Silver salts unstable}%
+is a compound of iron. The salts of chromium
+are also sensitive to such waves.
+
+It was remarked that the salts of silver are sensitive
+to ether waves between quite a wide range in wave
+lengths, but the longest of them is in about the middle
+of the visible spectrum. They reach from there into
+the region beyond the violet. Yellow and red waves
+are incapable of affecting such a preparation, while the
+waves that are the most efficient for it are the blue
+ones.
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{171a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{13}{Diag.\ 13.---Photographic Range for Silver Salts.}
+\end{figure}
+
+Other substances have a different range, and a curious
+chemical discovery has shown that silver molecules
+may be loaded; that is, may have attached to them in
+a temporary way some other kinds of molecules that
+render them sensitive to waves of any length. If an
+ordinary photographic plate has a solar spectrum
+thrown upon it, there will be no indication of action
+below the green; but, if aniline be added to the sensitive
+coating and the plate be then exposed in the same
+way, the action will now be seen to have gone on to a
+distance below even the longest red wave that can be
+seen. In this way photography has shown that the
+spectrum of most incandescent bodies is much longer
+than the visible part of it in both directions. It was
+the observation that photographic action took place
+\DPPageSep{172.png}{160}%
+\index{Molecules, loaded}%
+most strongly in the blue part of the solar spectrum,
+and in the region beyond, that led to the belief that
+light waves and chemical rays were, in some way,
+unlike each other. From what has been said it will be
+seen that the reason for the different action was due to
+the character of the material used. When a molecule
+is made bigger or heavier in any way, longer waves can
+affect it more; and that is the significance of the so-called
+loaded molecule. In reality, the whole molecule
+is made more complex and bigger, and longer waves
+can shake its atoms loose.
+
+It is to be hoped that all can understand that there
+is nothing mysterious about photographic action; that
+it is as simple in its mechanical principles as anything
+can be. One may not be able at once to say in
+any given case which atoms or which parts of a molecule
+are loosened by the vibratory strains. In this one
+it may be the nitrogen, in another it may be the silver,
+and in still a third it may be oxygen; but in each case
+the mode of action is the same, and it may be said to
+be mechanical throughout.
+
+
+\Section{VISION.}
+
+Our various senses differ much in their mode of
+action, and require for excitation not only each its
+proper stimulant, but degrees of remoteness from
+actual contact to the most distant points. Thus the
+sense of touch requires absolute contact of a body: so
+also does taste,---the sugar or the salt must dissolve
+upon the tongue. A distance of but the tenth of an
+inch between the sugar and the tongue will be absolutely
+\DPPageSep{173.png}{161}%
+prohibitive to the consciousness of sweetness.
+The sense of smell requires the actual contact of the
+gaseous molecules upon the nasal membrane, but currents
+of air and gaseous diffusion secure to us this condition,
+so that the emanating body itself may be at
+some distance, and yet we become conscious of the
+bank of violets, the cup of coffee, or the chemical laboratory.
+This sense, therefore, enlarges our field, so to
+speak, and permits us to be conscious of bodies out of
+our immediate reach. The sense of sound still farther
+enlarges the space that can react upon us. But the
+loudest sounds, such as the roar of cannon and thunder,
+lose their intensity shortly, and can rarely be
+heard beyond a few miles. If our endowment of
+senses stopped with these, we should really be quite
+\index{Senses}%
+limited in our possible knowledge; for as we can know
+only what comes into our experience, how small the
+possibilities of existence would be to us! What we
+could touch, taste, smell, and hear we could know something
+about, though we were unconscious of any lacking
+sense. We should need some apparatus that could
+make us conscious of the most distant things as well
+as those close at hand. We should need just what we
+have got,---the sense of sight, that extends the field of
+experience and of interest to us to the boundaries
+of creation. The other senses give us information of
+contiguous things, but sight brings the universe itself
+to our consciousness.
+
+The sense of touch is diffused all over our bodies.
+There is no such thing as an organ of touch. The
+senses of taste and smell are restricted to localities and
+\DPPageSep{174.png}{162}%
+to organs that have other functions as well. Only sound
+and sight have specific organs, having no other function
+than to respond to sonorous and optical motions, and
+thus they have a peculiar dignity in the physiological
+mechanism; and precisely because the eye and ear have
+these mechanical functions do they come into the domain
+of physics. They are machines by which certain forms
+of motion are transformed into others suitable for nerve
+transmission to the seat of consciousness.
+
+It has often been pointed out that the structure of
+the eye is like the camera of the photographer. In each
+\index{Camera}%
+there is a chamber~\textit{a}, having a lens in front, which has
+a length %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{174a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{14}{Diag.\ 14.}
+\end{figure}
+of focus adapted to the distance between it and
+the back of the chamber, so that the image of objects
+external to it will be produced by it upon the back of
+the chamber, where there is in each a sensitive coating
+so affected by the light as to make an impress. In the
+camera this action has been explained as chemical
+reaction when molecular dissociation results, proportionate
+to the amount of light that falls upon any part
+of the surface exposed.
+
+In each there is an arrangement for altering the focal
+distance of the lens. In the camera it is a ratchet-wheel
+that moves the lens towards or away from the
+back. In the eye there are muscles attached to the
+\DPPageSep{175.png}{163}%
+edge of the lens that by contracting make the pliable
+lens less convex and so increase its focal length. For
+the camera %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[15]{r}{2.25in}
+ \Graphic{2.25in}{175a}
+ \Caption{15}{Diag.\ 15.---Photographic Camera.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+there is
+\index{Camera}%
+an exchangeable diaphragm
+having perforations
+of various
+sizes to admit more
+or less light through
+the lens. In the eye
+there is a colored
+muscular disk called
+the iris, that contracts
+or expands in
+an automatic way so
+as to expose more or
+less of the lens to
+the light. The functions
+of the two devices are identical.
+
+The energy possessed by the ether waves that fall
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{175b}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{16}{Diag.\ 16.}
+\end{figure}
+upon the sensitive photographic plate is spent in doing
+\DPPageSep{176.png}{164}%
+\index{Vision, phenomena of}%
+the molecular work of disintegration. In the eye all
+the energy is stopped at the sensitive back coating
+called the retina, and must of course be accounted for
+in some physical way. In the camera all the energy of
+the waves is spent in precisely the same kind of a way;
+that is, there is no such distinction as what is called
+color in it: and color photography---that is, the direct
+picture of objects in their proper, natural tints, such
+as we know they have, upon the sensitive plate---has
+not been accomplished, for the probable reason that the
+colors of the molecules that are the result of the decomposition
+of the silver compound are either transparent
+or blueish black. In the eye, the distinction between
+wave lengths which we denominate color sensation is
+very pronounced.
+
+The sensations are so much complicated with the
+processes that induce them that it is not always easy to
+keep in mind the purely physical side or the subjective
+side while treating of them.
+
+The following are some of the more common phenomena
+of vision which must be taken into account in forming
+any judgment or theory of it.
+
+When a firebrand is swung round and round it
+leaves an apparent luminous trail, the length of which
+depends upon the rapidity of motion. This is called the
+persistence of vision, and indicates that the sensation
+does not cease instantly after the source has gone. If
+the brand be swung round at the uniform rate of once
+per second, the length of this luminous trail will be a
+rough measure of the duration of the sensation after it
+is once excited. Thus, if it appeared to be one-quarter
+\DPPageSep{177.png}{165}%
+of the circle, the sensation must last for one-fourth
+a second. For impressions not very bright the sensation
+lasts but about the tenth of a second. If, however,
+the object looked at be very bright, like the sun, for an
+instant, the sensation may last for many seconds; and,
+in general, the older the person the longer does it last.
+
+Different colors also have different degrees of persistence.
+\index{Colors}%
+Violet, blue, and green soonest fade out, and red
+is the last to vanish for most eyes. This signifies that
+wave length has in someway to do with the persistence.
+When a bright colored object, like a bit of red paper,
+is put upon a sheet of white paper and steadily looked
+at for a few seconds, and is then suddenly removed while
+the eyes are kept fixed upon the same place, the image
+of the red paper will still be seen, but it will appear with
+a green tint, and will fade out in a few seconds. A
+green piece of paper, or any green object looked at in
+the same manner, will give an image in red. Blue ones
+give yellow, and yellow blue; and these tints seen in
+this way are called complementary to each other, as it is
+found by combining such together they produce the
+sensation of white light. Whiteness is therefore a compound
+sensation. Formerly, it was thought that white
+was only produced by the composition of all the colors
+of the spectrum in the same proportions they exist in it;
+but the same sensation of whiteness can be produced
+by red, green, and violet, and by blue and yellow. This
+is not to be understood as applying to pigments or
+paints, but to light itself.
+
+If one looks at a strongly lighted object intently for
+a few seconds, and then turns his eyes to a dimly
+\DPPageSep{178.png}{166}%
+\index{Vision, hallucinations of}%
+\index{Vision, energy needed for}%
+lighted drab surface, he will be able to see, sometimes
+in a surprisingly realistic way, the same object against
+the new background. If it be a person looked at,
+the features may even appear in a startling way.
+The size of the subjective figure will depend upon
+the distance of the background, being larger the more
+remote that is. Age and health have much to do
+with the persistence of such sensations\DPtypo{}{.} Young and
+vigorous persons seldom notice them until they
+carefully look for them; while older ones, and especially
+weakened ones, may be much troubled by
+them. Some nervous systems react upon the eye itself,
+and give rise to similar images there; and these subjective
+images have not unfrequently been mistaken for
+objective persons living or dead. The color a given
+object appears to have is not unfrequently modified by
+what colors the eye has been resting upon the instant
+before, and hence two persons may look at once upon
+the same picture and see it in very different tints.
+
+As ether waves are the source of the sensation, it is
+obvious that a certain number of consecutive waves
+must be necessary to affect the eye; that is to say, it is
+not in the least probable that a single wave of any
+length could produce a sensation. How many are
+needed is not known, but one can determine somewhere
+near what the number must be if he knows how
+brief a time is sufficient to produce a sensation. It is
+said that some flashes of lightning have been found to
+occur in less than a millionth of a second, and those
+may produce a very strong sensation.
+
+If there are five hundred million million vibrations per
+\DPPageSep{179.png}{167}%
+second, as we know there must be to give such a sensation,
+in the millionth of a second there must be five
+hundred millions; if the brightness were reduced ten
+thousand times and it were still visible, there must
+then have been not less than fifty thousand waves: and
+this is equivalent to saying that the eye could perceive
+light if it lasted no longer than the ten thousand
+millionth part of a second, which is probably true.
+But there is another condition; namely, the \emph{energy}
+of the waves must be sufficient to effect a physical
+change in the eye; and we know that the energy of
+such ether waves varies with the square of their amplitude.
+If, then, any wave whatever has not energy sufficient
+to produce the necessary physical disturbance in
+the eye, it could not produce vision. And this is the
+most probable reason that we do not see in what we
+now call darkness. It has been shown that all matter
+at all temperatures is vibrating and setting up ether
+waves, and also that in all liquids as well as solid
+bodies there are vibrations due to their atomic and
+molecular interference; and, theoretically, there must
+be vibrations of all wave lengths at all times and in all
+places, but at low temperatures the shorter waves,
+though not absent, would have but small energy, and,
+as the body becomes hot and the shorter ones acquire
+more, it is done at the expense of the energy of the
+longer ones, for the light given out by an incandescent
+lamp increases faster than the supply of energy to produce
+it. It therefore appears as a necessary conclusion
+that the reason we cannot see in the dark is not so
+much because the waves of proper wave length are
+\DPPageSep{180.png}{168}%
+\index{Vision of animals}%
+\index{Vision, theory of}%
+entirely absent, as that they have too little energy to
+affect our eyes. Other animals, such as rats, mice,
+owls, bats, and the like, can see where it appears to us
+to be pitch dark. They must, therefore, have eyes
+adapted for longer wave lengths than are ours, or else
+the sensitiveness of their eyes exceeds ours. As
+they see readily in the daylight, it is certain they are
+adapted to such waves as our eyes are; and, if ours
+were sufficiently sensitive, or had a greater range in
+effective wave lengths, there would be no such condition
+as darkness. That is the same as saying that
+darkness is in us rather than being a condition external
+to us.
+
+
+\Section{THE THEORY OF VISION.}
+
+When it was discovered that the sensation of whiteness
+could be produced by combining three different
+colors,---red, green, and violet,---it was inferred that
+there were probably three sets of nerves that were spread
+as a fine net-work over the retina so that either of these
+rays might fall at any point in the field of vision upon
+it and so produce the sensation. At the same time,
+when one or two of them were absent, the other nerve
+ingredient would be present to be affected; and, furthermore,
+each one of these three nerves was sensitive to
+quite a wide range of wave lengths, and their overlappings
+gave perception without any break from the
+extreme red to the extreme violet. In this way color
+perception could be explained. This view was adopted
+as a working hypothesis; and there was no other proposed,
+although there was no evidence whatever for the
+\DPPageSep{181.png}{169}%
+existence of three sets of nerves having different properties.
+It has, however, lately been discovered that
+the retina secretes a substance called purpurine, on
+\index{Purpurine}%
+account of its purple tint, which is very rapidly
+bleached or decomposed by the action of light. That
+is to say, it possesses photographic properties in a
+marked degree. This discovery has led to the view that
+vision may be altogether due to photographic action,
+and the older view has been about abandoned. The
+details of this theory have not yet been all worked out,
+but the purport of it may be briefly stated.
+
+Given the purpurine spread over the retina: this
+would be its sensitive coating corresponding to the silver
+preparation upon the photographic plate. The
+action of the light upon it being the same in character,
+decomposes it into simpler molecular compounds. The
+optic nerve is certainly spread over the retina, and the
+purpurine is in its meshes, and any disturbance taking
+place in this substance must correspondingly affect the
+ends of the nerves imbedded in it. Given the disturbance
+that can affect the optic nerves, and it is transmitted
+at once to the base of the brain and there interpreted
+as light sensation. The differences there might
+be in the amount of disturbance would be the differences
+that are called brightness or intensity. If molecules
+are disintegrated, as in photographic action, there
+must be a relatively large amount of free-path motion
+resulting from the wave action in the eye, and the
+amount of it proportional to the energy expended.
+Such an effect would give a general sensation of light,
+probably, also, effects of light and shade, so the forms of
+\DPPageSep{182.png}{170}%
+bodies would be readily enough seen. It would also
+account for persistent effects; for, when molecules are
+made to move fast or slow, they do not cease instantly
+on the removal of the source of the motion, but they
+continue to thus move until their energy has been
+reduced to that of the surrounding medium. With
+simple purpurine there appears to be no more possibility
+of chromatic effects than there is in the common
+silver preparation on the photographic plate. Suppose,
+however, the purpurine to be not a simple kind of a
+body, or made up of only a single kind of molecules,
+but instead made up of as many as three different
+kinds having as many different molecular weights, and,
+therefore, capable of being reacted upon by three different
+wave lengths. Call these three substances \textit{a},~\textit{b},
+and \textit{c}~purpurine. Let \textit{a}~be such as red waves can
+decompose, \textit{b}~such as green ones can decompose, and \textit{c}~such
+as only the short purple ones can break up or
+shake up. If these are uniformly mixed together and
+spread over the eye, then red waves would shake up
+the red constituent, but would leave the others alone;
+and the same would hold true of the others. If one
+has been looking at red-light wave lengths, the \textit{a}~purpurine
+would be used up, but the \textit{b} and~\textit{c} would still be
+present unimpaired; and now, when white light is again
+looked at, the \textit{b}~and~\textit{c} would be acted on strongly because
+they are present in greater quantity. The resulting
+sensation would be the compound of these two
+reactions, which, as is well known, is a greenish tint.
+In a like manner, each of the others when used up
+would leave the same field fresh with the other constituents,
+\DPPageSep{183.png}{171}%
+\index{Color-blindness}%
+\index{Retina, its functions}%
+and so give the complementary tints; and in
+this way chromatic effects of all sorts can be accounted
+for.
+
+Some persons are color-blind; that is, they are
+unable to distinguish some colors; and this defect is
+usually for red rays. Such a color-blind person will be
+unable to see the red end of the spectrum, and the
+colors of it will appear to leave off in the yellow or
+orange. The old explanation was that the red sensation
+nerves were absent. The newer explanation is
+that the \textit{a}~ingredient of the purpurine is wanting either
+partially or altogether.
+
+Of course it is to be understood that the products of
+decomposition by light in the eye are removed and
+fresh material secreted in its place by the organ itself
+in a manner similar to the removal of waste tissue and
+its repair in any other part of the system.
+
+The function of the retina, then, would appear to be
+the secretion of the sensitive substance needed for
+vision, instead of itself being the sensitive substance.
+
+Such an explanation of vision makes the eye still
+more like the photographic camera than appears in its
+outward form and mechanical functions. And thus one
+is able to trace the forms of motion that constitute the
+heat and the temperature of a body through its resultant
+ether waves to the molecular break-ups at the ends
+of nerve fibres, whence the characteristic motions are
+transmitted to the base of the brain, to be interpreted
+thus or thus, according to position, number, and energy.
+We begin with motion, we end with motion at the
+seat of consciousness, and there we stop. It is vibratory
+\DPPageSep{184.png}{172}%
+in the hot body it starts from, it is undulatory
+motion in the ether, it is oscillatory in the disrupted
+molecules, and a longitudinal wave in the nerve.
+Whether it is discharged from further service at the
+base of the brain, or is stored up in some way as experience,
+no one can say; but it is certain that a relatively
+large amount of molecular energy finds its way constantly
+to the brain, and some of it is re-employed as
+reflex action, giving rise to voluntary and involuntary
+\index{Reflex action}%
+muscular and secretory processes, as when one winks, or
+dodges a threatening motion before the will can act, or
+laughs or weeps at sights and sounds. In either case
+the result is the physical expression of a physical antecedent,
+with an intermediate mental quality called
+emotion.
+
+The eye may then be said to be a machine for the
+transformation of ether waves into interpretable molecular
+or atomic motions, and its function ceases at the
+ends of the optic nerve.
+%\DPPageSep{185.png}{173}%
+
+
+\Chapter{VIII}{Electricity}{173}
+
+\First{The} industrial applications of electricity are now so
+extensive and varied that every one is acquainted with
+them in some measure, and yet fifteen years ago there
+were millions of persons in the civilized nations who
+had never seen an electrical phenomenon with the exception
+of lightning. The apparently capricious behavior
+of lightning, together with the attractions and repulsions
+exhibited by electrified bodies, were phenomena
+so different in character from any other, that it came
+to be looked upon as a very mysterious force. Fifty
+and more years ago it was classed with heat and light
+as one of the imponderables. To-day even the question
+is often asked, What \emph{is} electricity? with the
+emphasis on the word ``is,'' as if one knowing enough
+might describe it as he might describe a genii or an
+object having specific qualities that might be isolated
+from everything else. Some have thought it to be a
+fluid, some two fluids, some vibratory molecular motion,
+some a property of matter, some a motion in the ether,
+some the ether itself; and, lastly, some have concluded
+that we do not and never can know its nature.
+Hence, to-day there is no generally received notion
+concerning its nature.
+\DPPageSep{186.png}{174}%
+\index{Electricity, origin of}%
+\index{Electricity, thermal}%
+\index{Thermodynamics, electric}%
+
+Still, one may know a great deal about the agent
+itself,---how it originates, what it will do, and its relations
+to other phenomena,---and not concern himself at
+all as to the nature of it. Heat and many of its laws
+were well known before any one knew or even suspected
+what its nature was. The law of gravitation
+is known and applied on the scale of the universe without
+demanding any explanation of the phenomena, and
+it is equally true that our knowledge of electricity is
+very extensive and accurate, and doubtless what we do
+not know to-day we may know to-morrow.
+
+
+\Section{ORIGIN OF ELECTRICITY.}
+
+It is here to be assumed as known, that various
+instruments, such as electrometers and galvanometers,
+are employed to detect the presence of electricity, and
+descriptions of them will not be given. Attention will
+be paid chiefly to the conditions that are present when
+electricity is generated.
+
+\Section{1. THERMAL ORIGIN.}
+
+When two different metals, such for instance as copper
+and iron, are touched together, they are found to be
+electrified; that is, an electrometer shows the presence
+of electricity. A piece of copper wire twisted to a
+piece of iron wire always becomes thus affected, but
+the effect is so slight that only delicate and sensitive
+apparatus will detect it. Wires of any of the metals
+under similar circumstances exhibit the same phenomenon,
+but in different degrees. This electrification is
+but transient; in a few seconds it has vanished. If the
+\DPPageSep{187.png}{175}%
+junction of the metals is heated by the fingers, or in
+any other way, the electrical condition is maintained
+indefinitely. If one will imagine such a compound wire
+bent into a ring so the ends nearly touch each other,
+it could be shown that the ends attract each other, the
+attraction being but slight. Here we are not so much
+concerned about the measure of what is taking place
+as with its character. If the ends of the wires be
+allowed to touch, and the twisted junction be kept warm,
+a current of electricity will continue to circulate through
+the ring; and, if the ends be connected to a galvanometer
+of sufficient delicacy, the needle would be
+continuously deflected, so long as the junction was
+warmer than the outer ends of the wires; and the deflection
+of the needle would be found to vary with the
+difference in temperature between the inner and outer
+junctions. Some metals, such as bismuth and antimony,
+when fastened by solder, or in any other way, give much
+stronger effects with a given temperature at their junction.
+Such a combination is called a thermo-electric
+pair. By joining a number of such together, so that
+alternate ends may be heated at once, the electrical
+effect is increased proportionally: two will give twice,
+and ten ten times as much, and so on. When a number
+of these are nicely compacted together and provided
+with binding-screws, they are called thermo-electric
+piles, and are of service in some investigations. It is
+not necessary, however, to have two different metals in
+contact to obtain the same kind of effects. If a piece
+of soft iron or platinum wire be wound into a close coil
+about a lead-pencil and the ends of it connected to a
+\DPPageSep{188.png}{176}%
+galvanometer, a current of electricity will traverse the
+circuit when one end of the coil is heated in a flame.
+If the other end be heated, the current will go in the
+opposite direction. The twisting of the wire into
+the coil produces a strain among the molecules that
+changes the physical properties to a slight extent: the
+density is altered. It therefore appears that in this
+case, as in the cases with two different substances, we
+have two \emph{physically} \DPtypo{diferent}{different}
+bodies, though of
+the same element. The
+facts may be generalized
+by saying that, %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\index{Thermopile}%
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{2.5in}
+ \Graphic{2.5in}{188a}
+ \Caption{17}{Diag.\ 17.---Thermopile.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+whenever two differently
+constituted bodies
+are placed in contact
+with each other, electricity
+is generated, and
+is maintained so long
+as there is a difference
+in temperature between
+the junction and the external
+ends.
+
+If one inquires for the
+origin of such manifestation as the first case, when two
+different metals are placed in contact, attention must
+be directed to the actual molecular condition of the
+two metals. Suppose them to have the same temperature,---as
+they have different atomic weights their
+vibratory rates cannot be the same,---and when the
+surfaces are put in contact there must be a re-adjustment
+\DPPageSep{189.png}{177}%
+\index{Chemical origin of electricity}%
+of their molecular motions, for each will interfere
+with the other. This disturbance of molecular rates
+is a disturbance in their relations of energy, and
+furnishes the energy for the electrical phenomenon
+that ensues. When equilibrium is restored, as it may
+be shortly, there is no longer any electrical exhibit.
+
+When heat is applied so as to keep the junction continually
+hotter than the other parts, the first effect is
+continuous; for as each element has its own proper
+vibratory molecular rate, which is increased by the
+heat, the interference is kept up and an electrical current
+results, which the heat is spent to produce and
+maintain. One needs to have in mind what is signified
+by heat as vibratory atomic, and molecular motion, in
+order to clearly perceive what is expended in the
+thermo-electric pile. The face of the pile, when it is
+generating a current of electricity, does not acquire
+that temperature it would acquire if it was prevented
+from producing a current by having the wires detached.
+Hence the amplitude of vibrations is lessened by the
+electrical work done, and we may say that heat has
+been converted into electricity, a thermal origin.
+
+
+\Section{2. CHEMICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+When a piece of copper is dipped into a vessel of
+water, and a wire leading from it is connected to a
+proper electrometer, it is found to be electrified to a
+certain degree. If a piece of zinc be substituted for
+the copper, it too indicates a still greater degree; and
+now let both be placed in the same water and connected
+by a wire, and a current of electricity will flow through
+\DPPageSep{190.png}{178}%
+\index{Polarization of molecules}%
+the wire, as in the case with the thermopile. This
+current will be a transient one, or very slight, if the
+water be pure; but if a little acid like sulphuric be
+added to the water, the current may be relatively a
+strong one. If, %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[11]{l}{1in}
+ \Graphic{1in}{190a}
+ \Caption{18}{Diag.\ 18.\break Galvanic Cell.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+instead of the zinc and copper, any
+other two metals be taken, the results will differ from
+the former only in degree. Zinc and copper,
+or zinc and carbon, are generally employed,
+because those have been found to
+give better results than other available elements;
+and such a combination of metals,
+with some solution, acid or alkaline, which
+is capable of \DPtypo{disolving}{dissolving} one or both of the
+metals, is called a galvanic battery. A single
+\index{Galvanic battery}%
+jar with its proper elements is called a cell; and by
+the addition of cells additional effects may be produced;
+that is, with two cells twice, and with ten cells
+ten times the effect.
+
+As with the thermo-pair, one may inquire what conditions
+were known to be present that could furnish an
+antecedent to the electrical current that results. This
+is answered by pointing out, as in the other case, that
+there are two substances differing in their physical qualities,
+copper and water, or zinc and water, and molecular
+rearrangement at their junction must necessarily
+result. More than this. It is known that the zinc and
+oxygen have a strong affinity for each other. The oxygen
+is combined with hydrogen to form the water, and
+in water the molecules are without any definite arrangement:
+they face in all directions, and move about with
+the greatest freedom, with but little, if any friction.
+\DPPageSep{191.png}{179}%
+When zinc is placed in it, the attraction of the zinc for
+the oxygen part of the molecule must result in making
+every water molecule in proximity to the zinc swing
+round so as to present its oxygen side to it. This orientation
+of the liquid molecules is called their polarization.
+The attraction between the two is not quite
+strong enough to disrupt the water molecule; but the
+addition of sulphuric acid weakens the attraction between
+the hydrogen and oxygen, and enables the oxygen
+to seize a zinc atom, and both combine with the sulphuric
+acid to form the sulphate of zinc. Here we
+have chemical reactions such as always result in exchange
+of energy; for the sulphate of zinc has less
+molecular energy than the zinc, the water, and the
+acid, in the same way that carbonic acid gas has less
+energy than the carbon and oxygen gas that formed
+it. There has been, then, a molecular change accompanied
+by the development, first of heat and second
+the generation of electricity; for if the electrical current
+be not allowed to flow, the battery cell will itself
+heat up more than it otherwise would do. There are
+chemical, thermal, mechanical, and electrical phenomena
+here, which may be perceived by carefully thinking
+of the successive steps in the process. The distinctive
+thing here is to bear in mind what the characteristic
+antecedents of the electrical phenomena are. What are
+the chemical, the thermal, the mechanical factors, except
+special forms of exchangeable molecular motions?
+So one may say that in a galvanic battery chemism or
+heat has been transformed into electricity. Though
+the mechanism of transformation is different, yet the
+same factors appear as in the thermopile.
+\DPPageSep{192.png}{180}%
+
+
+\Section{3. MECHANICAL ORIGIN.}
+\index{Electricity, mechanical origin}%
+
+When a piece of glass or of wax is rubbed with a
+cloth or catskin, the two substances subject to the
+friction become endowed with a new property which
+they do not otherwise exhibit. If a glass disk be
+mounted so as to %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{192a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{19}{Diag.\ 19.---Static Electrical Machine.}
+\end{figure}
+be rotated, and proper connections
+made to it, as in the common Static Electrical machine,
+a current of electricity may be maintained by maintaining
+the friction, and all the electrical phenomena may
+be produced that can be with electricity from any other
+source. They are identical, but the source is the friction
+of dissimilar substances. It will be recalled that
+dissimilarity in substance was the condition in each of
+the former cases; but in this, mechanical friction is the
+\DPPageSep{193.png}{181}%
+\index{Electricity, magnetic origin}%
+\index{Stress, magnetic}%
+second factor. In the chapter on heat it was pointed
+out, and it is a familiar enough fact everywhere, that
+heat is always the immediate result of friction. So in
+this mechanical source, with apparatus so dissimilar in
+all outward form to both thermopile and galvanic battery,
+we still have precisely the same molecular conditions
+that were operative in them to produce electricity,---two
+dissimilar substances, and heat or a kind of motion
+that results at once in heat.
+
+
+\Section{4. MAGNETIC ORIGIN.}
+
+If a wire of any sort be placed across the pole of a
+magnet, and held quiet there, no electrical effect will
+be noted; but if the wire be moved toward or away from
+the pole, it will become electrified, and if one end of it
+be connected to an electrometer the movement of the
+needle will indicate it. If the two ends of the wire be
+connected to a galvanometer, whenever the wire is thus
+moved in front of the magnet pole a current will flow
+through the circuit, and the movement of the needle
+this way or that will indicate the motion of approach or
+recession. The strength of this current will vary with
+the rapidity of the motion of translation of the wire
+through the space in front of the magnet; and the wire
+through which it goes becomes heated. This is the
+same as saying that the mechanical motion of translation
+of the wire is converted into heat in a manner as if
+it had been subject to ordinary friction there; and as a
+matter of fact, it is found to require more energy to
+move the wire in such a space when the ends of the wire
+are in contact, than it does when they are not. This
+\DPPageSep{194.png}{182}%
+\index{Electricity, electrical origin}%
+shows that the material of the wire is subject to some
+restraint under such conditions and in such positions,
+and the degree of restraint depends upon the distance
+it is from the magnet, as well as upon the strength of
+the magnet itself. Hence the different parts of the
+wire are in different physical states. And this is just
+what is exhibited by the twisted wire in the case of
+the thermal origin; and when motion is imparted to the
+wire, the degrees of stress in it change, and a current of
+electricity is the result. That such a stress is really
+present in the wire can be proved in several ways,
+which only need to be alluded to in this place. First,
+the electrical resistance of a wire is greater when in
+front of a magnet than elsewhere; and second, the
+phenomenon known as Hall's, in which a current of
+electricity going through a conductor is deflected from
+its course in the neighborhood of a magnet. So we
+have, in this magnetic origin, two bodies with different
+physical constitutions and external motions impressed
+upon them, which gives the electrical product
+observed.
+
+
+\Section{5. ELECTRICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+Imagine two wires parallel to each other and a foot
+apart. If an electrical current from any source is made
+to traverse one of them, a corresponding current will
+be initiated in the other, but in the contrary direction.
+In a like manner if a constant current be kept in one
+of the wires, and the other one be moved towards and
+away from the other, currents will be set up in it.
+Their direction will depend upon whether the motion
+\DPPageSep{195.png}{183}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+\index{Stress, electrical}%
+be approach or recession. The effect is the same
+whether either or both move at the same time. The
+effect is similar to the one described under the head of
+Magnetic Origin, showing that in some way the space %[xref]
+about a wire having a current of electricity in it is substantially
+similar to that about a magnet. The process
+is called electro-magnetic induction in both cases, and
+the explanation is the same in this as in the other. It
+will be well, however, to point out that there are steps
+in this process that need attention for the sake of mechanical
+clearness.
+
+Given say, an electro-magnet, through which a current
+can be sent at will, and so be made magnetic,
+and with the wire in front of it as before. There is
+now no magnetism and no electricity in the wire.
+Make the iron magnetic, and the current is at once induced
+in the other. I say at once, but this does not
+mean instantaneously. It takes a short time for the
+effect of the magnet upon the ether to travel to the wire
+and affect it. As no electricity escapes from the electro-magnetic
+circuit, the electricity observed in the wire,
+or second circuit, is generated in it, and the \emph{immediate}
+antecedent of it was the stress in the ether which was
+produced by the magnet. Hence an electrical current
+can arise from a proper kind of stress in the ether, no
+matter how that is produced, as one of the factors; the
+other factor being motion of some sort, mechanical or
+otherwise. The steps are, an electric current in a conductor,
+an electro-magnetic effect of the current upon
+the ether, the reaction of the ether upon the second conductor.
+Let these steps be kept in mind always when
+\DPPageSep{196.png}{184}%
+thinking about inductive action, and there can then be
+no confusion from trying to imagine how electricity
+gets from one circuit to another when they are insulated
+from each other.
+
+
+\Section{6. PHYSIOLOGICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+There are certain kinds of fish that are capable of
+giving powerful electrical shocks to men and animals.
+They are provided with special organs for this purpose,
+but they have not been the subject of much study for
+several good reasons. First, they are only to be found
+in a few localities, and are difficult to obtain; and second,
+their electrical qualities cannot be studied except
+when they are alive; and when they are living and
+healthy their shocks can kill both men and animals,
+and few are willing to incur the risk. Both mankind and
+animals in general can give rise to electrical currents.
+By grasping with the thumb and finger of both hands
+the terminal wires from a delicate galvanometer, a current
+is indicated,---a part often due to thermo-electric
+action, and a part to physiological action,---and it will
+vary with the tightness of the squeeze of contact and
+the person experimenting, some developing much more
+relatively than others. It also varies with the parts of
+the body in contact with the wires. This physiological
+effect is always extremely minute, and is not to be
+mentioned beside the amount necessary to effect the
+remarkable things said to be done by personal electricity,
+such as moving chairs, tables, etc. I do not
+think any one has been found whose physiological
+electricity could do so much as raise a grain the tenth
+of an inch.
+\DPPageSep{197.png}{185}%
+
+The various processes continually going on in the
+body, such as breathing, digestion, blood-circulation,
+and muscular motions of all sorts, and under conditions
+of different temperatures, different material, different
+chemical reactions, are quite sufficient to account
+for all that has been observed in this direction.
+
+
+\Section{7. ATMOSPHERIC ORIGIN.}
+
+The origin of lightning, so far as details go, has
+\index{Lightning}%
+never been satisfactorily accounted for. It is obviously
+not an affair that can be investigated in any very scientific
+manner, for one can never control any of the conditions
+when it arises.
+
+Some have thought it due to the condensation of
+electrified vapor molecules condensing into drops of
+water, the degree of electrification increasing with the
+size of the drops. How the original electrification of
+the molecules was produced is not explained by such.
+There is no doubt but that a large amount of energy is
+often involved in a stroke of lightning, judged by its
+sudden destructive work. The immediate source of
+this energy is the question\DPtypo{}{.} There is no doubt but
+when a gas or a vapor is condensed into a liquid, a
+notable amount of energy is liberated in motions of
+some sort; for it requires energy to be spent upon water
+to produce the vapor. This is given back when the
+process is reversed. This energy has often been called
+latent heat. If this process goes on faster than it can
+be conducted away, it must either be transformed, or the
+process must stop\DPtypo{}{.} We know, too, that heat motions
+are most freely transformed into electrical by the phenomena
+\DPPageSep{198.png}{186}%
+\index{Electrical antecedents}%
+\index{Terminology, electrical}%
+of the thermopile and the galvanic battery,
+and it is not improbable that this is the source of the
+atmospheric electricity. It is certain that where it
+originates there are two differently constituted kinds of
+matter,---the air and the water; and it is equally certain
+that there are some vigorous exchanges of motion, both
+in the form of wind and heat, and these are the conditions
+present in each of the cases where our knowledge
+is most complete.
+
+One may then fairly conclude from the analysis of
+all the known sources of electrical development, that
+motion of some sort is the antecedent in every case.
+This motion may be the sort called mechanical, or that
+called molecular or atomic, as heat, but it is always a
+factor; and the amount of electrical energy developed
+in every case is equal to the \emph{immediate} mechanical,
+chemical, or thermal energy which disappears when it
+is produced. If one admits that the quantity of energy
+in phenomena is constant, that the quantity of matter
+is constant, there is but one variable factor, and that is
+motion. If mechanical motion is transformable into
+heat, and heat into electricity, and some known form of
+motion is the invariable antecedent to the production
+of electricity, it does not need a very profound logician
+to say, \emph{so far}, the nature of electricity is known.
+
+
+\Section{ELECTRICAL TERMINOLOGY.}
+
+Every particular science and art has some technical
+terms to give precision and definiteness to its processes
+and its laws, and the advances made in any science
+depend very largely upon exact signification of its
+\DPPageSep{199.png}{187}%
+terms. The late rapid development of electrical science
+is due in a large measure to terminology, adopted
+about twenty-five years ago; for it enables a man not
+only to know what he himself is talking about, but also
+to understand others, and that was not the case before.
+A system of units and names for them are matters of
+the first importance. How these were derived need not
+be stated here, but it is needful for every one now to understand
+the significance of the more common of them.
+
+Imagine a wire in front of you with an electrical current
+traversing it from left to right. If it travels in that
+direction it is because the electrical pressure is less
+towards the right than in the opposite direction, just as
+water flowing through a pipe towards the right travels
+thus because gravitative pressure is less in that direction
+than in the other. Gravitative pressure is measured
+in pounds, electrical pressure is measured in \emph{volts}.
+
+If the pressure at the left of the wire were increased
+in any way, there would be an increased current of
+electricity in the wire, just as there would be more water
+go through the pipe if the head or gravitative pressure
+were increased. The rate of water flow might be measured
+as so many cubic inches or cubic feet per second.
+The rate of electrical flow is measured in \emph{ampères}.
+
+If the water pipe were a large one, and the pressure
+the same, more water would flow through it than if it
+were a small pipe of the same length. In like manner
+a thick wire will permit more electricity to flow through
+it with a given electrical pressure than a thin one. The
+water pipe is said to oppose friction to the movement
+of water.
+\DPPageSep{200.png}{188}%
+
+A conductor of electricity is said to offer resistance
+to the flow of electricity. No name has been given to
+any unit of frictional resistance, but electrical resistance
+is measured in \emph{ohms}.
+
+A definite quantity of water flowing at a given rate
+will be emptied from the pipe in a second or a minute.
+So will a definite quantity of electricity go through
+the wire in a second or a minute. The quantity of
+water thus flowing would be measured as so many cubic
+feet, or so many gallons; the quantity of electricity is
+measured in \emph{coulombs}, a coulomb being an ampère per
+second. Where the rate of flow of an electrical current
+is given in ampères, the quantity will be found by
+multiplying the ampères by the number of seconds the
+flow has continued. Thus a ten ampère current in an
+hour will have conveyed $10 × 60 × 60 = 36000$ coulombs.
+
+There are also measures of capacity. The cubic inch,
+the cubic foot, the pint, quart, bushel, and so on, are
+measures of volume or capacity: any of them may be
+adopted as a unit, and when accuracy is required all are
+reducible to the cubic inch as a standard. Thus in a
+gallon there are $231$~cubic inches.
+
+In electricity the unit of capacity is called a \emph{farad},
+and it represents the capability of an electrical device
+to receive and hold a definite amount of electricity
+under the standard conditions of pressure. Thus, when
+under a pressure of one volt it holds one coulomb, the
+capacity of the apparatus is said to be one farad.
+Actually a piece of apparatus of sufficient size to hold
+that quantity has to be so enormously large that a much
+smaller one was requisite for convenience, and consequently
+\DPPageSep{201.png}{189}%
+\index{Potential, electrical}%
+the microfarad, or the one-millionth of the farad,
+has been more generally adopted.
+
+As work may be got out of a flow of water, the
+amount of work depending upon the pressure and the
+rate of flow, so may work be got from an electric current,
+the amount depending upon the pressure, volts,
+and the current, ampères. The product of these factors,
+volts into ampères, is called \emph{watts}; and the mechanical
+value of one watt is such that $746$~is equal to
+a horse-power, which, as before stated, is $550$~foot
+pounds per second. The working power of a watt is
+therefore $\dfrac{550}{746} = .735$ of a foot pound per second.
+
+
+\Section{OHM'S LAW.}
+\index{Ohm's law}%
+
+%[** PP: Putting upright variables in math mode]
+This is simply that the current in an electric circuit
+may be determined by dividing the electric pressure in
+volts by the resistance in ohms. It is customary to use
+symbols for each of these factors, $E$~or E.M.F. (electro-motive
+force) for the pressure in volts, $R$~for the resistance
+in ohms, and $C$~for the current in ampères, so Ohm's
+Law when thus written reads $\dfrac{E}{R} = C$. Recurring to the
+idea of a wire in front carrying a current of electricity
+from the left to the right, and also the statement that
+the electrical pressure is greatest at the left as the
+cause of the current towards the right, it is well to
+remark here that the electrical pressure at any particular
+point in a circuit is sometimes spoken of as its
+potential. If the potential at some other point in the
+circuit be different from the first, the current will flow
+\DPPageSep{202.png}{190}%
+\index{Conductivity, electrical}%
+from the higher towards the lower. The difference of
+potentials may be measured in volts, and expressed as~$E$
+in Ohm's Law.
+
+There is a very wide difference among different substances
+in their ability to transmit electricity. Some
+transmit it freely, and are called good conductors; others
+transmit it but slowly, and such are called poor conductors.
+All solids, and liquids possess some degree of
+conductivity; but some of them, such as glass, rubber,
+and wax, are so poor in conductivity as to be called non-conductors.
+The term non-conductor came into use
+before the refined methods now in use for measuring
+conductivity were known. It is now believed that
+the only non-conductor of electricity is the ether. If
+this be the case, then it appears that all the so-called
+electrical phenomena in the ether are to be looked upon
+rather as the results of electrified matter upon the
+ether, than the presence of electricity in the ether, just
+as radiations or ether waves are the results of actual
+vibrations of atoms and molecules. Conduction, then,
+is a general property of matter, and differs in degrees,
+that difference depending upon both the kind of element
+considered and its molecular combination. Thus,
+copper is an excellent conductor; but if copper be
+chemically combined with sulphur or with oxygen its
+conductivity is greatly impaired.
+
+Conduction, too, implies contact, physical contact,
+as in the case of heat; hence solids and liquids may
+continuously conduct electricity, while gases can conduct
+no faster than their individual molecules can move
+in their free-path motions, and the rate of electrical
+\DPPageSep{203.png}{191}%
+\index{Ether, a non-conductor}%
+loss is so slow from this source, that for telegraph lines
+of hundreds of miles in length it is neglected as being
+of no practical consequence. Neither is moist air
+much better, and for the same reason. In all cases
+where dampness appears to affect the working of electrical
+apparatus, the loss is due to the moisture deposited
+upon the surface of the apparatus, which thus
+forms a thin conductive coating. A Leyden jar may
+retain its charge for months if protected from a coating
+of moisture, which, of course, it could not do if
+either the air or the ether were conductors in any ordinary
+sense of the word.
+
+The words conduction and conductivity represent the
+property possessed by matter to become electrified by
+mere contact with another body that is electrified; but
+the terms do not have a very high scientific importance
+now, for a much more convenient term is employed in
+place, the term resistance, which is the reciprocal of
+conductivity, that is, the greater the one the less the
+other proportionally. The substance having the highest
+degree of conductivity has the smallest degree of
+resistance. Resistance is measured in ohms, and is of
+two sorts; viz., specific and dimensional. Specific resistance
+is that resistance which depends altogether
+upon the nature of the particular element considered,
+and may be determined for any element by measuring
+the resistance of a cubic centimetre of it.
+
+Tables of conductivity and of resistance of wires
+are common, and the following one gives the relative
+values of a few of the elements for comparison. The
+standard of conductivity being silver and reckoned as~$100$.
+\DPPageSep{204.png}{192}%
+\index{Conductivity, electrical}%
+\index{Resistance, electrical}%
+The standard of resistance being a column of
+mercury $106$~centimetres long and one millimetre
+square, which has a resistance of one ohm. The numbers
+given are the resistances in ohms and fractions of
+a wire $1$~metre long ($39.37$~inches) and one millimetre
+($\frac{1}{\DPtypo{15.4}{25.4}}$~of an inch) in diameter.
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{l<{\qquad}>{\qquad}r@{}l<{\qquad}>{\qquad}r@{}l}
+\scriptsize\llap{SU}BSTANCE. &
+ \multicolumn{2}{c}{\scriptsize\llap{CONDU}CTI\rlap{VITY.}} &
+ \multicolumn{2}{c}{\scriptsize\llap{RE}SISTA\rlap{NCE.}}
+\\
+Silver, & $100$& & &$.021$
+\\
+Copper, & $99.$&$9$ & &$.021$
+\\
+Gold, & $80.$& & &$.027$
+\\
+Aluminium, & $56.$& & &$.037$
+\\
+Zinc, & $30.$& & &$.072$
+\\
+Platinum & $18.$& & &$.116$
+\\
+Iron, & $17.$& & &$.125$
+\\
+Lead, & $8.$&$5$ & &$.252$
+\\
+German Silver,& $8.$& & &$.267$
+\\
+Hard Carbon, & $1.$& & $50$&$.00$
+\\
+Graphite & $0.$&$01$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Very variable.}
+\\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The resistance of most liquids, and of such substances
+as are used for insulating wires, is so very great
+that they are given in units called megohms, each a
+million ohms. The following represents the resistance
+of a few bodies in such terms, the volume being one
+cubic centimetre:---
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{l<{\qquad\qquad}r}
+\qquad\scriptsize SUBSTANCE. & \scriptsize\llap{RESISTANCE} IN \rlap{MEGOHMS.}
+\\
+Ice, & $284.$
+\\
+Water at freezing-point,& $150.$
+\\
+Mica, & $84.$
+\\
+Gutta Percha, & $450.$
+\\
+Hard Rubber, & $28,000.$
+\\
+Paraffine, & $34,000.$
+\\
+Glass, & $3,000,000.$
+\\
+Air, & Infinite.
+\\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+\DPPageSep{205.png}{193}%
+These must be read as so many millions of ohms.
+Thus, ice\DPnote{** [sic], no verb} $284$ millions. Thus can be seen within what
+wide limits this electrical property of matter ranges,
+and also its significance as a factor in Ohm's Law, and
+why some substances can be practically used as insulators
+when in reality they possess a certain degree of
+conductivity. Thus, glass is called an insulator. But
+if there were a difference of potential or pressure on
+opposite sides of a piece of glass one centimetre thick,
+equal to $3,000000$ of millions of volts, there would be
+a current of one ampère passing through for
+\[
+\frac{3,000000,000000}{3,000000,000000} = 1
+\]
+In no artificial way can we produce such a voltage as
+that; but it is the opinion of some physicists that the
+voltage of lightning may rise as high as some thousands
+of millions. Under ordinary commercial voltages of
+only a few thousands, the current would be insignificant.
+Suppose it were $50,000$ volts, then
+\[
+\frac{50,000}{3,000000,000000} = \frac{5}{300,000000} = \frac{1}{60,000000}
+\]
+of an ampère.
+
+Dimensional resistance is of more practical importance,
+for by making a conductor larger its resistance
+becomes less. When the cross section of a wire is doubled,
+the resistance is reduced one-half. When the
+diameter of it is doubled, it is reduced to one-fourth,---a
+relation which may be stated as follows: The resistance
+of a conductor varies inversely as its cross section,
+or the square of its diameter if it be a wire; so by
+making a relatively poor conductor large enough, it may
+\DPPageSep{206.png}{194}%
+\index{Electricity, activity}%
+transfer as large a current as a much better specific
+conductor of smaller dimensions. In the table it is
+shown that the resistance of copper to that of iron is as
+$.021$ to~$.125$, or that the latter is six times the former.
+If, then, the section of the iron wire be made six
+times larger, it will have the same degree of conductivity
+as the copper. This means that one pound of
+copper is worth nearly six pounds of iron for electrical
+conduction; and whether the one or the other should
+be employed in a given place depends chiefly upon the
+relative costs. It is a commercial rather than an electrical
+question. The resistance of all conductors varies
+with their length.
+
+Temperature also affects the conductivity of nearly
+all bodies. Some have their conductivity increased
+by heat, as is the case with carbon; others have their
+conductivity increased by cold. Thus, the conductivity
+of copper at $100°$~below zero is increased nearly ten
+times.
+
+An idea of the relative magnitude of the factor of
+resistance in common electrical work may be gained by
+knowing that a mile of ordinary electric arc-light wire
+generally has a resistance of about two ohms; telegraph
+and telephone wires five or six ohms, and often
+more, per mile. If there be a current of ten ampères
+going through a mile of wire that has a resistance of
+one ohm, then Ohm's Law enables one to determine
+what is the difference in pressure between the ends;
+for $\dfrac{E}{R} = C$ and $E = RC = 1 × 10 = 10\text{ volts}$. So if any
+two of these factors be known, the other may be computed.
+\DPPageSep{207.png}{195}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+The $E$~gives the available electrical pressure;
+the $R$~gives the conditions under which it can work,
+and the $C$~gives their resultant, the available current,
+while the product of~$EC$ gives the activity, or rate at
+which energy is expended in the circuit, while if this
+product be divided by~$746$, the horse-power of the circuit
+will be given.
+
+The further significance of Ohm's Law and its utility
+will be given farther on, when considering the relation
+of electrical energy to mechanical energy.
+
+
+\Section{INDUCTION.}
+
+It has been pointed out that the term conduction
+signifies the transferrence\DPnote{** [sic]} of electricity from one body
+to another by contact,---contact in the sense that the
+molecules of solids and liquids are in contact when they
+cohere, and when their individual vibrations cannot take
+place without mutual interference. It is found that
+bodies become electrified by merely being in the presence
+of another body that is electrified, without material
+contact, and the more perfect the vacuum between
+the bodies the more freely does this phenomenon take
+place. As the electrified body that thus affects other
+bodies in its neighborhood does not lose any of its own
+electricity, does not share it with other bodies in any
+degree, and as the other bodies lose their electrification
+by simply being removed to a distance, and will recover
+it again by being brought back, it follows that the
+action is entirely distinct from the phenomenon of electrical
+conduction. A similar body electrified by conduction
+will retain its condition, and distance will make
+\DPPageSep{208.png}{196}%
+\index{Electrical field}%
+\index{Fields, electrical}%
+no difference. This kind of action is called \emph{electrical
+induction}. To understand what changes take place, it
+will be needful to attend particularly to the factors
+present. Under the head of Electrical Origin of Electricity, %[xref]
+it is pointed out that an electrical current may
+be induced in a circuit adjacent to another circuit in
+which a current is produced in any way; and here are
+similar conditions and similar phenomena. Imagine an
+electrified body freely suspended in the air. If a gold-leaf
+electroscope is brought within a few feet of it, its
+leaves will diverge; if brought nearer they will diverge
+still more; recession will cause them to collapse. This
+movement of the leaves can be produced indefinitely by
+changing the distance of the electrometer from the
+electrified body. It is important to note here that it
+requires the expenditure of energy to move the gold
+leaves, though the amount may be small. If it may be
+done for an indefinite number of times, then the energy
+spent may be indefinitely great; and that it is not
+directly derived from the electrified body itself is certain;
+for the latter loses by the process none of its electricity,
+and cannot lose it except by conduction. Evidently
+the body has in some way modified the physical
+condition of the space about it so that another body
+within that space is affected somewhat as it would be if
+touched by an electrified body. But the property belongs
+to the space itself, and cannot be extracted from it
+so long as the electrified body remains in place. This
+space about an electrified body within which other bodies
+assume an electrical condition is called an \emph{electrical
+field}. It may extend to an indefinite distance
+\DPPageSep{209.png}{197}%
+\index{Electrical stress}%
+\index{Stress, electrical}%
+from it, and its strength has been found to vary like
+gravity, being inversely as the square of the distance.
+This new physical condition into which the space has
+been brought by the electrified body is known to be the
+effect of the latter upon the ether, and is called its electrical
+\emph{stress}. It is simply the reaction of the one upon
+the other, and indicates that the molecules stand in
+abnormal strained positions. A mechanical idea of
+what it is like may be got by pressing the hand upon
+the top of a table, and then producing a twisting strain
+tending to turn the table round, but without moving it.
+The whole table will be subject to a stress that will react
+upon the hand, a condition which will, of course, be
+retained by the table as long as such pressure is kept
+upon it. For the hand substitute an electrified mass of
+matter, and for the table the ether in any direction
+about it, and one will have a fair conception of the
+electrical field. Especially so, if he will add to it that
+such twisting effect can be either right-handed or left-handed,
+and so produce those distinctions known as positive
+and negative, which run all through electrical
+phenomena.
+
+A body brought into this distorted field of ether is
+acted upon by the latter tending to twist its molecules
+into new positions with reference to each other, which
+is precisely the condition that brought about the original
+stress, that is to say the electrical one, with this
+difference, that if the original one was right-handed
+the reaction of the ether would be left-handed, or
+exactly opposite that of the inducing body. This is
+simply because action and reaction are equal to each
+other and \emph{opposite}.
+\DPPageSep{210.png}{198}%
+\index{Electrical waves}%
+
+One can now understand how it can be that bodies
+can be electrified by induction without loss of electrification
+by the inducing body. There are three steps in
+the process. 1st,~The body electrified in any known
+manner. 2d,~Its resultant stress in the ether. 3d,~The
+reaction of the ether upon the second body,
+inductively electrifying it. Electricity has not been
+conducted by the ether, but a stress has been, and
+the ether stress has electrified the second body. By
+periodically electrifying and delectrifying a body, a
+series of stresses will be produced about it which will
+travel outwards as a succession of waves, the velocity
+of which is the same as that of light, $186,000$ miles
+per second, and the wave length of which will depend
+upon the number of electrifications per second. Suppose
+a sphere, like a cannon-ball in free space, to be
+connected by wire, so that by pressing a Morse telegraph
+key in connection with any source of electricity
+it could be charged and discharged at will. If the key
+was closed regularly once a second, the wave produced
+would be $186,000$ miles long. If it could be
+closed $186,000$ times per second, the wave would be
+one mile long. And if it could be closed so often that
+the wave length should be but the one fifty-thousandth
+of an inch, there is every reason to believe that the
+eye would perceive the waves as light; not so much
+because the waves were produced by electrical means,
+as that the eye is capable of perceiving ether waves of
+that length, no matter how they may originate.
+
+The analogy between heat and electrical phenomena
+in the ether is very close. The ether receives the
+\DPPageSep{211.png}{199}%
+energy from both sources and transforms it. The
+ether is not a conductor of either heat or electricity:
+it is neither heated nor electrified by them, but in each
+case is simply a medium for the distribution of such
+energy as gets into it according to its own laws, and
+quite independent of its source. When heat gives up
+its energy to ether it becomes ether waves or radiant
+energy, and is no longer heat: it has been transformed.
+When radiant energy falls upon other matter it is
+again transformed into heat. In like manner, when
+electricity gives up its energy to the ether, it becomes
+radiant energy also, and when this falls upon other
+matter it is again transformed into electricity. I have
+been thus particular to enlarge upon induction, and
+point out the factors present, in order to make it clear
+how entirely distinct the electrical condition in matter
+is from the electrical effect of it upon the ether. It is
+from a failure to keep these distinctions in mind that
+so many have been mystified by electrical phenomena,
+and so many different theories have been propounded
+as to its nature.
+
+In all our experience electricity originates in matter,
+and whatever the particular character of the phenomenon
+\emph{in matter}, it ought to have a different and distinct
+name from the effect of such phenomenon upon the
+ether. If such endowment of matter be called electricity,
+then it is not proper to use the same word for
+its stress, or wave effect, in the ether, and this for
+precisely the same reason as is allowed to hold good in
+heat phenomena. Formerly ether waves were called
+heat, afterwards heat waves, now radiant energy, for it
+is known that there is no heat in the ether.
+\DPPageSep{212.png}{200}%
+
+
+\Section{EFFECTS OF AN ELECTRICAL CURRENT---1. MAGNETISM.}
+
+If a wire through which a current of electricity is
+passing be twisted into a loop or ring, it is found that
+the loop acts in all ways like a magnet. Its sides have
+polarity; and if it be so mounted as to be free to
+assume any direction, it will move so its sides face the
+north and south. If a piece of iron be placed in the
+ring, the magnetic effect will be greatly strengthened.
+Soft iron, however, loses its magnetic property as soon
+as the current stops. A piece of steel will retain some
+portion of the magnetic condition, and so is called a
+permanent magnet. A given current of electricity
+will make a much stronger magnet of a piece of soft
+iron than it will of a piece of steel, and this is explained
+by saying that the iron is more \emph{permeable} to
+magnetism than steel is. Once in possession of a
+magnet, one may proceed to study its physical properties
+in many ways. That a magnet possesses poles;
+that it can attract and hold to itself iron, steel, nickel,
+cobalt, and affects other substances but slightly; that
+it is attractive to unlike poles of other magnets, and
+repulsive to similar poles,---and so on, are phenomena
+so widely known that they need not be described here.
+Only such phenomena will be considered as will be
+helpful to an understanding of the constitution of a
+magnet, and its relation to electricity and to the space
+about it.
+
+The magnetism of a magnet seems to reside chiefly
+near its ends, for these will sustain bits of iron, but
+near the middle it will not; and when a small compass-%
+\DPPageSep{213.png}{201}%
+needle is moved around a bar magnet, it points towards
+one end or the other, except when near the middle,
+where it sets itself parallel. When such a bar magnet
+has a sheet of paper laid upon it, and iron filings are
+sprinkled upon the paper, the filings are arranged in
+curious curved lines, starting from one pole and traceable
+to the other, and quite around the magnet on both
+sides. This %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{3.5in}{213a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{20}{Diag.\ 20.---Magnetic Lines.}
+\end{figure}
+arranging power of the magnet extends in
+every direction about it, as one can satisfy himself by
+trying the same experiment with the magnet turned on
+different sides. If one will compare the direction of
+these lines of filings with the positions of the needle,
+he will see that the needle assumes the same direction
+at any given place. Near the poles the lines all converge
+to it, and opposite the middle the lines are parallel
+with the magnet. If the magnet be of a U~or
+horse-shoe form, the lines will be found still to extend
+from one pole to the other, some straight, some curved
+\DPPageSep{214.png}{202}%
+\index{Fields, magnetic}%
+outwards, but always forming a curve such as to touch
+each pole of the magnet. While the filings are in the
+position described, let the paper be gently tapped with
+a pencil so as to jostle them slightly, and they will
+begin to close up in such a way as always to shorten
+themselves, and presently they will form a dense mass
+between the poles, adhering to the latter as a solid
+piece of iron would do.
+
+Such phenomena show that the magnet in some way
+reacts upon the space about it, so that iron and other
+magnets there are affected, just as an electrified body
+affects the space about it, as has been described. This
+space about a magnet within which such effects are
+produced is called the \emph{Magnetic field}, which may be
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+said to be the stress in the ether produced by a
+magnet. Like the electric stress, it extends to an
+indefinite distance from the magnet, and travels with
+the velocity of light; so if a magnet was charged and
+discharged once a second, a wave motion would be set
+up: the wave length would be $186,000$ miles long, and
+if it could be charged and discharged so fast that the
+waves were but the one fifty-thousandth of an inch in
+length, it is very probable they would be perceived as
+rays of light, and the magnet would be a luminous
+body. Such waves are called electro-magnetic waves.
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+At present the shortest waves of this sort, that can be
+artificially produced, are several inches long, but it
+seems highly probable that before long some way will
+be discovered of making them of the required length
+for vision.
+
+If a test-tube filled with iron filings be held near a
+\DPPageSep{215.png}{203}%
+delicate suspended magnetic needle it will be found to
+give no indication of polarity, one part will act just
+like any other part, and the magnet will be equally
+attracted. Bring the test-tube against the poles of a
+strong magnet for a few seconds, and then it will be
+shown that the filings have become magnetic, and now
+one end of the tube will attract one pole of the needle,
+while the other end will repel the same end. Shake
+up the filings well, and the polarity will be destroyed.
+
+Stir up iron filings with melted wax, and pour into a
+paper mould, so as to form a stick the size of the finger,
+or larger. If this be tested for magnetism, it will be
+found without any; but magnetize it as if it were a
+piece of steel, and it will be found to retain it, becoming
+a permanent magnet. If a layer of iron be electrically
+deposited upon a brass wire in a magnetic field,
+the wire acts like a magnet. All these phenomena go
+to show that what is called polarity or magnetism is
+due to the \emph{positions of the molecules}, rather than upon
+some sudden endowment which the molecules receive
+and may lose. Imagine every molecule of iron to be
+a magnet, having its poles or faces, then if in a mass
+of them, such as makes up a piece of iron or steel,
+all be made to face one way and keep such position, all
+will act in conjunction to give polarity to the mass.
+When some molecules face one way, and others adjacent
+to them face the opposite way, they will but
+neutralize each other, so the external evidence of
+magnetism will be destroyed. How atoms may be
+magnets and exhibit polarity may be imagined by considering
+the phenomena of vortex rings again. In the
+\DPPageSep{216.png}{204}%
+ring all the motion on one side is towards the middle
+of the ring inwards, on the other side all the motion is
+outwards, so the properties of the two sides are opposite.
+Each such ring must have its own \emph{field}, which
+may extend to an indefinite distance from it, and may
+be represented roughly by the diagram in which the
+curved lines show the same features before described
+as belonging to a magnetic field. When two or more
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+are facing the same way, and are in contact, these lines
+cannot re-enter the ring except by going round the
+second one; and when many are in line they must go
+round them all, in which case the %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \begin{minipage}[b]{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{216a}
+ \Caption{21}{Diag.\ 21.---Field of a Ring.}
+ \end{minipage}
+%
+ \begin{minipage}[b]{1.5in}
+ \raisebox{12pt}{\Graphic{1.5in}{216b}}
+ \Caption{22}{Diag.\ 22.---Coinciding Fields.}
+ \end{minipage}
+%
+ \begin{minipage}[b]{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{216c}
+ \Caption{23}{Diag.\ 23.---Opposing Fields.}
+ \end{minipage}
+ \end{center}
+\end{figure}
+direction of the lines
+will be precisely those observed about a straight bar
+magnet.
+\Pagelabel{105} %[** PP: Label to p. 105 seems to point here]
+
+When they all face one way, as in diagram~22, the
+resultant will be at~A, the sum of the outgoing movements,
+and at~B, the sum of the ingoing ones, and
+polarity at A and~B will be at a maximum. If they face
+in different ways, each will tend to cancel the other,
+and there will be no external field; as in diagram~23.
+\DPPageSep{217.png}{205}%
+\index{Ether pressure}%
+
+If two such atoms be brought face to face, each will
+be blowing against the other; their fields overlap, and
+the stress is increased between them, and they are
+crowded away from each other,---a phenomenon called
+repulsion. The opposite condition obtains when they
+face the same way and are near together, with the
+result that the stress is lessened between them, and
+they are pushed together by it; and this is called
+attraction.
+
+There has been growing the conviction for a long
+time that the atoms of all substances are magnetic; but
+\Pagelabel{205}%
+when they combine into molecular groups they are
+turned about so their magnetic fields neutralize each
+other, and thus it happens that most molecular compounds
+show no polarity. But every substance whatever
+is attracted by a magnet, and will move up to it if
+the magnet be a strong one. Brass, lead, stones, oats,
+corn, and wood will all be affected alike by a strong
+magnetic field, being pushed towards the magnet in the
+same way as iron, though not in the same degree. The
+pressure of iron against a magnet, due to the magnetic
+field, may be as great as a thousand pounds per
+square inch.
+
+When a piece of iron is brought near to a magnet,
+and it becomes a magnet by induction instead of by
+contact, it is to be understood that its molecules are
+rotated into similar positions by the action of the
+magnetic field upon it, not that magnetism has gone
+from the magnet to the iron; and when it requires a
+pull, and therefore work, to move a piece of iron away
+from a magnet, it is against the ether the work is done.
+\DPPageSep{218.png}{206}%
+
+It was stated at the outset that a loop of iron through
+which an electric current is passing is a magnet, and
+previous to that it was pointed out that an electric %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.75in}
+ \Graphic{1.75in}{218a}
+ \Caption{24}{Diag.\ 24---Iron Filings about Electric Current.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+current in a wire has a field
+that extends indefinitely out
+from it. If such a wire be
+dipped in iron filings, they
+form rings round it, showing
+that the polarity is at right
+angles to the wire. Now, if the wire with the iron
+filings clinging about it be made into a loop, it will
+be seen at once how the polarity of the different
+segments is all in one direction inside the ring, and
+opposite to that on the outside the ring, and the
+structure will be a forcible reminder of a vortex ring.
+If several similar turns be taken in the wire, and they
+all be brought near together so as to form a helix, it
+will also be seen that these conspire together to set a
+boundary to the field on the inside, but allow indefinite
+expansion to it outside; so if one should draw the lines
+for it as iron filings would be arranged by it, he will
+have the precise lines of a magnet, while the ring
+structure will be, on a large scale, just
+what was described on an atomic scale
+as constituting a vortex ring magnet;
+and the only thing lacking to complete
+the analogy is the conception of a rotary
+motion in the wire at right angles to its length.
+
+%[Illustration][** PP: Moved down to avoid LaTeX warning]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.25in}
+ \hfil\Graphic{1in}{218b}\hfil
+ \Caption{25}{Diag.\ 25.---Adjacent Turns.}
+\end{wrapfigure}It has been found that when a current has been
+started in a conductor, a torsional impulse is given to
+the latter in such a sense that if one looks along it in
+\DPPageSep{219.png}{207}%
+the direction of the current the twist is in the direction
+of the hands of a clock. So there is direct confirmatory
+experiment showing that the nature of the motion in
+an electric circuit is rotary in such a way that the
+whole circuit may be considered as a vortex ring; and
+as it is the matter of the conductor that is thus rotated,
+it follows that electrical current motion is rotary, as
+heat motion is vibratory.
+
+Allusion has been made to the opinion now current that
+ether waves or light are electro-magnetic phenomena.
+\index{Ether waves, their source}%
+\index{Light waves}%
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+How this can be may be understood by considering a
+magnet of any form, with its surrounding field. If the
+form of the magnet be changed, the shape of the field
+will be correspondingly changed; and as this extends
+out indefinitely into space, it follows that a succession
+of changes of form would set up waves through the
+whole of that space. Now, a magnet is an elastic body,
+and if it be struck it will vibrate and produce a sound.
+The vibration implies a change of form, and that in
+turn a set of waves radiated into space. As the field is
+an ether field, the waves will be ether waves. Now
+assume that atoms are themselves elastic magnets, each
+with a field indefinitely extended, and it follows that
+the vibrations produced by impact, or in any other
+manner, will set up corresponding waves in the ether,
+the wave length depending upon the vibratory rate of
+the atoms. Thus ordinary radiant energy, or light,
+would consist of undulations in a magnetic field.
+
+Of course it will be perceived that vibrations of any
+electro-magnetic body, large or small, would induce
+similar waves, differing only in wave length, so there
+\DPPageSep{220.png}{208}%
+\index{Magnetic induction}%
+would be in the ether wave lengths of all dimensions,
+\Pagelabel{208}%
+from the shortest possible to those millions of miles
+long. It is now an important physical problem how to
+produce such that shall be of the dimensions capable of
+affecting the eye.
+
+\Subsection{Induction Coils.}
+\index{Induction coils}%
+
+One or more loops of iron, through which a current
+of electricity is flowing, is an electro magnet. When
+iron is placed in the loop, it condenses the magnetic
+field, and it may be made as much as thirty times
+stronger than it would be without the iron. When a
+magnetic field is produced inside a loop of wire, the
+reverse effect %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.75in}
+ \Graphic{1.75in}{220a}
+ \Caption{26}{Diag.\ 26.---Electro-Magnetic Induction.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+happens, and a
+current is generated in the
+opposite direction. Suppose
+a short rod of iron to have a
+single turn of wire at each
+end about it, one of them,
+as~A, to be so connected to a source of electricity
+that a current through it may be produced by closing a
+key, the other one to be a closed circuit, as shown. If
+a current be established through~A in one direction, a
+current will be induced in~B, as indicated by the arrow.
+There will be in the loop of the A~circuit a certain
+electro-motive force,~$E$. A nearly equal electro-motive
+force will be induced in loop~B. If there were two
+loops at~B instead of one, the electro-motive force would
+be twice that in~A, and for $n$~turns it would be $n$~times.
+The current in~B will depend upon the resistance in its
+circuit; that is, it will be $\dfrac{E}{R}=C$, according to Ohm's
+\DPPageSep{221.png}{209}%
+Law. The size of the wire in B~circuit will not make
+any difference in the value of~$E$ in it. That value will
+depend only upon the magnetism of the bar, and the
+magnetism in the bar will be measured by the product
+of the current into the number of turns of wire in
+the circuit~A. And this product is called the \emph{ampère
+turns}. The ampère turns will be nearly equal in the
+\index{Ampère turns}%
+two circuits. This process of obtaining electrical
+currents in a second circuit by two transformations is
+of great use in the electrical industries, and the device
+is called an induction coil or transformer. The charging
+circuit is called the primary, and the discharging
+one the secondary. By making circuit~A of a small
+number of turns of thick wire, so as to allow strong
+currents in it, and having circuit~B consist of a great
+number of turns, the electro-motive force may be
+raised almost indefinitely. Suppose there be $100$~turns
+in the \textit{A}~circuit,\DPnote{[** Italicized in orig, not sure why]} and a hundred thousand in the \textit{B}~circuit,
+then for every volt in the A~circuit there may be
+nearly a thousand volts in the B~circuit; and this is the
+construction in those instruments known as induction
+coils, with which so called jumping sparks are produced,
+and represent sometimes a million or more volts. On
+the other hand, it is sometimes desirable to change a
+high electro-motive force to a lower one; and this may
+be done by reversing the connections and making the
+primary current go through a great number of turns,
+and taking the induced current from the smaller number
+of turns in the other circuit. Definite reduction in
+either way may be effected by making the ratio of the
+number of turns in the two circuits the reduction
+\DPPageSep{222.png}{210}%
+\index{Electro-magnets}%
+\index{Welding, electric}%
+wanted. That is to say, if there are $100$~volts in
+the primary circuit, and only ten are wanted, make the
+secondary of one-tenth the number of turns in the primary.
+If a thousand volts are wanted, make the secondary
+with ten times the number of turns in the primary.
+It should be remembered, also, that two turns of wire in~B
+have twice the resistance of one turn, and the current
+induced will be reduced to one-half. If there be one
+hundred turns, it will be reduced to one-hundredth and
+so on. Hence, in the large induction coils for high electro-motive
+forces, the current is necessarily a small one,
+while in the transformers in which the reduction is to
+lower values of~$E$ than are in the primary, the current
+may be very great indeed. This is the case in Thompson's
+Welding Apparatus. The secondary has but a
+single turn of heavy copper, while the primary has many
+thousands, and the current in the secondary may be
+thousands of ampères. As the heating effect is proportional
+to the square of the current, it is plain that
+such large currents have enormous heating power.
+
+All such devices require either intermittent or alternating
+currents to operate them, for there is no induced
+current in any circuit when the inducing magnetism is
+not changing. A constant magnetic field induces no
+electrical changes.
+
+
+\Subsection{The Electro Magnet.}\DPnote{** [sic] No hyphen}
+
+This is generally considered as consisting of a helix
+of insulated wire about a piece of soft iron, and may be
+either a straight bar, or crooked in any convenient form,
+its function being to produce a magnetic field when a
+\DPPageSep{223.png}{211}%
+current circulates in the wire, and to lose it when the
+current stops. This it does only partially, for all iron
+when once it has been magnetized becomes more or less
+permanently magnetic; hence there is only a difference
+in degree between an electro magnet and a permanent
+magnet. Until within a few years the electro magnet
+had its most extensive field of usefulness in telegraphy.
+It was combined with a piece of soft iron near its poles
+called its armature, which was so mounted that the
+magnetic field made it to move towards the magnet, and
+a retractile spring pulled it away when the field was
+absent. The movement of the armature was employed
+to receive signals. In some cases the movement recorded
+itself, and sometimes its prompt motion produced
+a sound, a succession of these being arranged into a
+telegraphic alphabet.
+
+If one has a good idea of a magnetic field and its
+action upon a piece of iron in it, he will be able to
+understand all the various combinations of forms and
+functions of electro-magnetic devices, however much
+they may apparently be disguised. Thus, the magnetic
+telephone is an electro magnet with an armature
+\index{Telephone}%
+of such size and flexibility as to be capable of much
+quicker movements than ordinary telegraph instrument
+\index{Telegraph}%
+armatures, the whole boxed so as to be convenient
+to hold to the ear. A common telegraph sounder
+acts in precisely the same way, though not so well, for
+the armature is too heavy, and one cannot concentrate
+its effects upon the ear on account of its form. An
+electric bell also produces its ring by having a hammer
+fixed to the armature, so as the latter moves in response
+to the electric field it strikes the bell.
+\DPPageSep{224.png}{212}%
+\index{Motor, electric}%
+
+An electric motor, in the largest sense, consists of a
+device for transforming electric into mechanical motions;
+and the relation sustained between an electro
+magnet, its field and an armature, is such as to do it
+directly. A telegraph sounder is thus a simple motor,
+for the armature moves visibly in response to the electric
+current. If a wire be wound about the armature,
+there is an induced current in it, as in an induction coil,
+and for the same reason; and the movements of the
+armature towards and away from the poles of the electro
+magnet, called sometimes the field magnet, give
+rise to currents in the armature coil. If a current
+from another source is sent through the armature coil,
+it gives polarity to the armature itself, and the reaction
+between it and the poles of the field magnet is still
+stronger, and the mechanical motions are still more
+energetic. The armature thus wound with wire is obviously
+an electro magnet itself, and when it is so
+mounted as to be capable of rotating between the poles
+of a fixed electro magnet, a continuous rotation may
+be kept up.
+
+The current in the fixed magnet is steady, and therefore
+maintains a steady magnetic field. The current
+in the armature magnet is changed in direction by the
+motion of the armature itself, and is effected by a device
+called a commutator. The efficiency of such a
+motor may be as high as $90$\%~or more. That is, for
+every horse-power of electrical energy turned into it, it
+will give back nine-tenths of a horse-power in actual
+work. The small space they occupy for the working
+capacity, when compared with a steam-engine for the
+\DPPageSep{225.png}{213}%
+\index{Efficiency of machines}%
+same work, the small amount of attention they require,
+and their freedom from the dirt inseparable from an
+engine, commend the electric motor as a substitute
+for the engine in most places where power is wanted
+and an electric current can be had; for it is to be
+remembered that fifty horse-power can travel through
+a wire that can go through a gimlet-hole, while a steam-plant
+for the same work would require a large boiler
+and engine as well as a big chimney.
+
+When the armature of a motor is made to turn by
+mechanical means, the shifting positions in the magnetic
+field develop electric currents in its coils. Such
+an armature cannot be turned as freely when the field
+magnet has a current in it as it can when it has not,
+and the energy spent in making it turn appears as a
+current. The device is called a dynamo, which may be
+\index{Dynamo}%
+said to be a machine for transforming mechanical motion
+into electrical motion. The steps are mechanical
+motion, magnetic field, electrical current; while in the
+motor they are simply the reverse,---electric current,
+magnetic field, mechanical motion.
+
+The efficiency of a dynamo is very high indeed. It
+can transform~$95$\% of the power applied to it into
+electrical power, and in this particular it is one of the
+most perfect machines in existence. There is absolutely
+no room for any important improvement in the
+dynamo as regards its efficiency. A good steam-engine
+may transform ten to fifteen per cent of the energy
+turned into it. A windmill may give fifty, a turbine
+water-wheel ninety, but when a dynamo gives ninety-five,
+it shows that the coming man has a margin of but
+five per cent for improvement in its efficiency.
+\DPPageSep{226.png}{214}%
+\index{Energy. What determines transfer}%
+\index{Fields, magnetic}%
+\index{Lighting, electric}%
+\index{Resistance, electrical}%
+
+Thus the magnetic field, which is simply the ether in
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+an abnormal condition of stress, is the common agency
+between mechanical motions and electrical phenomena,
+and transfers energy one way or the other. All that
+determines whether it shall be one way or the other is
+simply which side has the excess of energy; for energy
+of a particular sort always goes from the body having
+more to one having less. Which side has the excess
+is determined solely by the mechanical conditions
+present.
+
+
+\Subsection{Electric Lighting.}
+
+An electric current always heats the conductor
+through which it is passing. The amount of heat depends
+upon the strength of the current, and varies as
+the square of it. In a given circuit with a uniform current,
+the current has the same value, and therefore the
+same heating power, in every part of that circuit; but
+the temperature to which a body will be raised by a
+given current depends upon its own constitution, its
+size and electrical resistance. Connect together three
+wires of copper, iron, and platinum, each a foot long,
+and of the same diameter, and make them a part of the
+same circuit, so that the same current shall flow through
+them. If the current be increased gradually, the iron
+wire will grow appreciably warm, more current will
+make it hot; platinum wire will be only warm;
+while the copper wire will not have its temperature
+much changed. Still more current will make the iron
+red-hot, the platinum uncomfortably hot, and warm
+appreciably the copper; and more current will fuse the
+\DPPageSep{227.png}{215}%
+\index{Electric lamps}%
+iron, perhaps make the platinum red-hot, but the copper
+may not yet be uncomfortably hot. This heating
+effect in a given wire is found to be proportional to its
+resistance: the iron wire having the greater resistance
+is most heated, and the copper having least, is least
+heated; hence to obtain a high temperature with a
+given current, a conductor must be chosen that has a
+relatively high resistance. Resistance, however, varies
+with the cross section inversely, so a small wire must
+be taken if the temperature of incandescence is to be
+reached with a small current; and a current that will
+raise half an inch of a wire to a white heat will raise a
+mile, or any other length of the same wire, to the same
+temperature; but the longer a wire is, the higher must
+be the electro-motive force in order to get the same
+current. For a given length of a wire the electrical
+energy spent in it will be found by multiplying its resistance
+by the square of the current,~\DPtypo{$RC,^2$}{$RC^2$,} which will
+give the products in watts, of which $746$~equal a horsepower.
+Metals are liable to fuse and become useless,
+so that wires of carbon, made by heating organic fibres
+in the absence of air, as in making charcoal, are substituted
+for metals. They fuse only at extremely high
+temperatures; and being enclosed in a vacuum in bulbs
+of glass they cannot burn up as carbon does when exposed
+to the air when red-hot. This is the electric incandescent
+lamp. Most of them are so prepared that a
+current of about three-fourths of an ampère is required
+to properly light them, and this will be got when the difference
+of potentials between the lamp terminals is kept
+at a certain figure, so that lamps are specified by the
+\DPPageSep{228.png}{216}%
+number of volts they require, rather than the current;
+thus there are $50$~volt lamps, $110$~volt lamps, and so on.
+Now, such lamps take ordinarily about four watts for a
+candle, so a twenty candle-power lamp requires eighty
+watts, and that means $\dfrac{746}{80}=9.3$ such lamps to the
+horse-power. Such lamps may last for a thousand or
+more hours. If a stronger current be used, they shine
+brighter, but their life is shortened. There is a process
+of slow disintegration going on in these lamps
+all the time. The surface molecules slowly evaporate
+under the vigorous vibratory movements present, and
+the carbon vapor thus formed sticks to the inside surface
+of the bulbs, giving them the familiar blackened
+appearance.
+
+
+\Subsection{The Arc Light.}
+\index{Arc light}%
+
+If an electro-motive force of forty or more volts be
+maintained in a circuit, and the circuit be broken at
+some place and the ends separated a small fraction of
+an inch, the current does not cease, and is maintained
+between the ends by what is termed an arc, where the
+temperature is so very great that almost all substances
+are reduced to vapor at once. All metals are fused and
+dissipated there. Carbon does not fuse there, but is
+slowly burnt up. The ends of the carbon reach a temperature
+higher than can be reached in any other
+known way, and the light they then give out is called
+the arc light. The rate of expenditure of energy in
+that small space where the brightness is, is generally
+some less than a horse-power. The current employed
+\DPPageSep{229.png}{217}%
+\index{Mars, signalling to}%
+is about nine and a half ampères, and the electro-motive
+force about forty-five volts; hence $9.5 × 45 = 427.5$
+watts, and such a lamp may be equal to $800$~candles,
+though they are generally rated as $2,000$ candle-power.
+
+By increasing the current the brightness increases,
+and there is no especial limit to the amount of light
+that may in this way be produced. With parabolic reflectors
+the light may be concentrated into a powerful
+beam. The inhabitants of Mars could see such a one,
+and it could be used for signalling between the two
+planets if the Martians had a similar one.
+
+Seeing that the temperature to which a given conductor
+can be raised by a current is determinate, one
+can arrange for heating on any scale. There is no
+other reason than the relative cost of electric heating
+compared with the ordinary method with fuels, why it
+should not be in common use to-day. In most places
+the dynamo for the production of the current would be
+run by a steam-engine, requiring in its turn a furnace;
+and it is cheaper to use the fuel direct for heating, than
+to transform the energy so many times, each time with
+some loss. A common furnace is much more economical
+of energy than a steam-engine. But if ever electricity
+is obtained directly from combustion in an economical
+way, as there is some reason for thinking possible,
+electrical heaters will displace stoves and the common
+furnaces in the house. So the same current that
+lights the house will serve for cooking and warmth.
+\DPPageSep{230.png}{218}%
+\index{Water decomposition}%
+
+
+\Section{2. CHEMICAL EFFECTS.}
+\index{Chemical effects}%
+
+When a current of electricity is passed through
+conducting liquids capable of being decomposed, such
+as acidulated water, and solutions containing more or
+less of the metallic elements, decomposition of the solution
+results, with the additional curious phenomenon
+that one of the elements of the decomposed compound
+appears at one terminal, and the other element at the
+other. Thus, if water be the liquid, hydrogen appears
+at one place and the oxygen at another. If the two terminals
+of an electric circuit were on opposite sides of the
+Atlantic Ocean, and a current were sent through the
+circuit, hydrogen would appear on one side and oxygen
+on the other. The oxygen is set free at that terminal
+at which the current reaches the liquid. The direction
+of the current being determined in the ordinary conventional
+way. Bring the wire carrying the current over
+and parallel to a suspended magnetic needle. If the
+current be going from south to north, the north pole will
+be deflected to the west. If the current be going from
+north to south, the south pole will be deflected to the
+west. Hence, if one looks along a wire in the direction
+of the current, oxygen will be given off at the next
+terminal if it dips in water. It may be convenient to
+know that when a battery is employed as a generator of
+electricity, hydrogen is set free at the terminal of the
+battery from which the current flows, and oxygen at
+the other end of that conductor.
+
+The decomposition of water may be taken as a type
+\index{Decomposition of water}%
+of electro-chemical work; hence, when the mechanical
+\DPPageSep{231.png}{219}%
+\index{Dissociations}%
+\index{Polarization of molecules}%
+conditions present where decomposition is going on are
+understood, they may be applied to any other case.
+
+Under the head Chemical Origin of Electricity it %[xref]
+was pointed out that the same factors which gave rise
+to the current also arranged the molecules of the liquid
+so that the oxygen sides of them all faced the same way,
+towards the zinc, which of course necessitates that the
+hydrogen sides should all face in the opposite direction.
+The other terminal of the battery tends to bring about
+a similar condition of things, so that between the terminals
+the molecules are all polarized or brought into an
+orderly arrangement. The direction of the electric
+current in such an arranged body of molecules in the
+liquid is from the zinc to the oxygen---oxygen, hydrogen,
+oxygen, hydrogen, and so on to the last molecule
+in the line, the hydrogen face of which is against the
+other terminal. So far this represents molecular arrangement,
+not molecular or atomic cohesion. There
+is good reason for thinking that dissociation of atoms
+in such molecules is going on all the time in some
+degree, on account of their incessant and vigorous vibratory
+motion. Such motion must tend to disrupt
+the atoms so that at any given instant there would be a
+relatively large number of atoms in the liquid already
+free and quite indifferent as to whether they recombine
+with the same or other atoms the next instant. If there
+be another agency present, like an electrical current,
+adding its energy tending to disruption, not only would
+a larger amount of dissociation take place, but when at
+one end of the line one element of the molecule, like
+oxygen, enters into a new combination which is more
+\DPPageSep{232.png}{220}%
+stable under the conditions present, the remaining hydrogen
+will combine with the oxygen of the adjacent
+molecule when that molecule is broken up, and so on
+along the whole line, leaving the hydrogen of the last
+liquid molecule to be freed against the other plate of
+the battery. This means that there is an exchange of
+partners among all the molecules of the liquid that take
+part in the current, else some of both oxygen and hydrogen
+would be set free elsewhere than at the terminals,
+which never happens.
+
+Now, all molecules are combinations of atoms in
+definite proportions by weight, and it is therefore to be
+expected when such decompositions as the above take
+place the products will be found in the same proportions.
+It is the necessary outcome of the operation. So for
+every one part by weight of hydrogen set free, eight
+parts of oxygen will be liberated; and for a like reason
+twice the volume of hydrogen as of oxygen.
+
+If a current of electricity be led through any liquid
+which it can decompose, and the material of the terminals
+be some substance that neither of the constituents
+of the molecule can combine with, both of the elements
+will be set free. Platinum is such an element; and if
+terminals be made of that, and dip into a tank of water,
+the current polarizes the molecules precisely as in the
+battery, and decomposition takes place in the same way,---oxygen
+being set free at the in-going terminal, and
+hydrogen at the out-going one. If the solution contains
+molecules of metallic salts of copper, nickel, iron, silver,
+gold, etc., the metallic side of the molecule faces in the
+direction of the current, the same as the hydrogen in
+\DPPageSep{233.png}{221}%
+\index{Plating, electro}%
+the former case; and as a consequence, the metal is deposited
+upon the out-going terminal, whatever that may
+be, and the other constituent of the molecule is set free
+at the in-going terminal. For example, the sulphate of
+copper is a compound of copper and sulphuric acid.
+Where it is subject to decomposition by an electric
+current, the copper is deposited at the one terminal, and
+sulphuric acid at the other. If both the terminals be
+made of platinum, one will be covered with copper, and
+the other will be surrounded with the acid, and all the
+copper in the solution may be taken out. If the in-going
+terminal be itself of copper, the sulphuric acid
+set free will itself dissolve off the copper as fast as the
+acid is set free, and in this way the solution will be kept
+saturated. The metal may be deposited on any other
+metal. It is in this manner that electro-plating of all
+sorts is done. Each different metal requires different
+treatment from the others as to solution, electro-motive
+force, current per square inch section, and so on for the
+best results. To decompose water, as much as one and
+a half volts are necessary to initiate it, but copper salts
+require only a small fraction of one volt. The amount
+of decomposition in a given time, say a second or an
+hour, depends upon the current employed. A current
+of one ampère will in an hour decompose only about
+fifteen and four-tenths grains of water, liberating one
+and seven-tenths grains of hydrogen. The weight of
+other elements set free or deposited by an ampère per
+hour is determined by multiplying the weight of hydrogen
+set free by the electro-chemical equivalent of the
+element, and this is either equal to its atomic weight, or
+\DPPageSep{234.png}{222}%
+\index{Lighting, electric}%
+is one-half or one-third that. Thus, the electro-chemical
+equivalent of gold is $\dfrac{196.6}{3} = 65.5$, of silver $\dfrac{108}{2} =
+54$\DPtypo{}{,} of copper $\dfrac{63}{2} = 31.5$, of nickel $\dfrac{57}{2} = 28.5$, and so on.
+So the amount of gold that will be deposited by an
+ampère in an hour is $1.7 × 65 = 111.35$ grains; of silver
+$1.7 × 54 = 91.8$ grains and so on. This shows a
+definite relationship between electricity and chemical
+reactions.
+
+It is to be kept in mind that when substances combine
+there is always some transformation of energy,
+and heat is either absorbed or given out. When
+hydrogen and oxygen combine there is a large amount
+given out, $61,200$ heat units for each pound of hydrogen.
+When, therefore, water is decomposed so as to
+set free one pound of hydrogen, the same amount of
+energy must be spent to do it. The electrical energy
+spent in a decomposing cell is, therefore, reducible to
+the heating effect, and may be calculated as such.
+
+
+\Section{3. LUMINOUS EFFECTS.}
+\index{Luminous effects}%
+
+When an electric current passes from one conductor
+to another through the air an electric arc is produced,
+and great heat and light are developed there. An arc
+is generally about an eighth of an inch long. By
+having a higher electro-motive force one may be made
+several inches long. The arc itself consists of the
+incandescent molecules of the air in its path mixed
+with some of the disintegrated particles of the carbon
+of the terminal. When an arc is formed in a partial
+\DPPageSep{235.png}{223}%
+\index{Geissler's tubes}%
+\index{Spark, electric}%
+\index{Vacuum, a non-conductor}%
+vacuum the character of the phenomenon is very much
+changed. Instead of being concentrated into a narrow
+space, it spreads out into an oval form, the size of
+which depends upon the degree of exhaustion. The
+terminals may be separated to a much greater distance;
+the light becomes less intense, and shows as a kind of
+glowing gaseous globe, and this may extend to the
+walls of the glass vessel in which it is produced.
+
+If the vacuum be made very perfect, no current can
+be got through it; for the ether is a perfect non-conductor.
+Even the spark from an induction coil that
+will jump several feet in the air will not jump a quarter
+of an inch in a vacuum. The jumping ability of
+an electric spark or current depends upon its electro-motive
+force. A thousand volts will jump but
+about the one-hundredth of an inch in common air,
+and ten thousand volts only about one-tenth of an
+inch. From such experiments it has been concluded
+that a flash of lightning probably has an electric pressure
+\index{Lightning}%
+reckoned by hundreds of millions of volts, but
+there is some doubt about the calculation for such
+exceedingly high voltage. Glass tubes provided with
+platinum terminals hermetically sealed, and from which
+the air has been partially removed, when connected
+with the high voltage terminals of an induction coil
+exhibit phenomena that depend altogether upon the
+degree of exhaustion in the tube. If the air pressure
+%[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbtp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{4in}{236a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{27}{Diag.\ 27.---Crookes's Tube. Long Free Path.}
+\end{figure}
+\index{Crookes' tubes}%
+be removed to about the one-hundredth of the normal
+pressure, the discharge appears as a broad band of
+purplish light between the terminals; if the reduction
+be to the thousandth, the light fills the tube. Still
+\DPPageSep{236.png}{224}%
+further reduced, the discharge appears broken up into
+striæ, or bright disks, their distance apart depending
+upon the degree of exhaustion, and they measure
+roughly the length of the free path of the gaseous
+molecules. If the exhaustion is carried to a very high
+degree, this free path may be made as long as the tube,
+\index{Molecules, long free path}%
+or longer. This means that a molecule may move
+from one end of the tube to the other without coming
+into collision with another one.
+
+When a molecule touches upon the electrified
+terminal, it is impelled from it with great velocity,
+quite like that exhibited in the radiometer, and probably
+\DPPageSep{237.png}{225}%
+\index{Heat by impact}%
+for the same reason. It moves away from the
+terminal in a straight line in obedience to the first
+law of motion, and continues on till it strikes another
+molecule, or the surface of the tube, and it shines as it
+moves, on account of its vigorous internal vibrations;
+for each gas gives its characteristic spectral lines when
+thus made incandescent. Where they strike upon a
+thin piece of platinum they may make it red-hot by
+impact, and where they strike upon the
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{4in}{237a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{28}{Diag.\ 28.---Crookes's Tube. Platinum made Red Hot by Impact.}
+\end{figure}
+walls of the
+glass tube the latter is made luminous with a phosphorescent
+glow, and may be made red-hot, and so
+softened as to bring about a collapse of the tube.
+These tubes are known as Crookes's Tubes, and their
+phenomena are extremely interesting from the insight
+they give into the behavior of matter under all sorts
+of conditions. With a set of these tubes, the laws of
+motion, kinetic energy, sound, heat, light, electricity,
+and magnetism may be illustrated in a way unapproachable
+\DPPageSep{238.png}{226}%
+with any other simple and cheap apparatus. The
+long free path, and inability to turn a corner when
+projected from an electrified terminal, show the first
+law of motion and inertia. The impact of the molecules
+may make a wheel turn round,---an example of
+energy as good as a windmill. The intermittent beats
+upon the sides of the tube produce a sound, the pitch
+of which is the same as that of the vibrations of the
+induction coil. The heating of the tube and its contents
+shows the transformation of free-path motion
+into vibratory molecular motion. The luminousness
+of the gas, and the phosphorescence of the tube, show
+\index{Phosphorescence}%
+the transformation of the electrical energy into the
+vibratory molecular kind, at a rate capable of affecting
+the eye. The phosphoresence\DPnote{** [sic]} itself showing the conditions
+needed for producing it; the origination of the
+motions in the tube showing the relation of electricity
+to the other forms of motion developed; the deflection
+of the stream of electrified molecules by a magnet
+illustrating the effects of a magnetic field upon a
+current of electricity. The fact that such streams of
+molecules are projected from an electrified terminal
+solely by impact there, is shown by their returning to
+it when there is nothing in front of it to expend their
+energy upon, as a ball returns to the earth when
+thrown into the air, which is the case when but one
+terminal is connected with the induction coil; and,
+lastly, such a tube will be lighted up by being merely
+in the neighborhood of an induction coil, or rather in
+a varying electric field. They may be insulated and
+several feet away from such induction coil or a Holtz
+\DPPageSep{239.png}{227}%
+or other similar machine and yet be internally lighted
+every time a spark passes, which shows that the luminousness
+seen in the tubes is not necessarily due to any
+electrical current present, because in this case there
+can be no electrical current.
+
+
+\Section{THE NATURE OF ELECTRICITY.}
+
+There have been many theories proposed to account
+for electrical phenomena, yet to-day there is no one
+that is generally held, even as a provisional one, among
+physicists. Some have even abandoned the hope of
+mankind ever being able to reach a consistent theory of
+it. The case has been the same in the history of heat,
+of light, and of magnetism; yet text-books of to-day do
+not hesitate to state what is the nature of each of these.
+Electrical phenomena have greater variety, and the
+apparent dual character oftentimes present has served
+to give a perplexing degree of complexity to them.
+The writer has thought that a summation of the principal
+factors present in electrical phenomena might be
+helpful to some in their endeavor to find some physical
+explanation without having to assume something \textit{sui
+generis}, which has no other necessity for being except
+the very dubious one of accounting for a certain phenomenon.
+Caloric, light corpuscles, and vital force
+were such visionary creations; but further knowledge
+has enabled science to dispense with all of them, leaving
+nothing in their places but what was known to
+exist before; namely, matter, ether, and their motions.
+Such a steady course of reduction to these factors
+leaves one with the fair presumption that it will likely
+\DPPageSep{240.png}{228}%
+fare the same way with any other agencies that have
+been imagined to account for phenomena, though the
+latter may, for the time being, seem not reducible to
+simple mechanics.
+
+There are certain \textit{a~priori} reasons for thinking that
+in electrical matters, as in all other physical agencies,
+only matter, ether, and motion are concerned. No one
+has ventured to identify ordinary matter and electricity,
+which cuts down the possibility to one of the remaining
+two.
+
+If it be admitted that matter is not altered in quantity
+by any process to which it may be submitted, and
+also that the amount of ether and energy in the universe
+are constant, it follows that all the different phenomena
+exhibited by matter are due to the different
+kinds of motion it may have; for \emph{motion is the only
+variable factor}. On such a premise one can fairly
+maintain that no matter how obscure and puzzling a
+phenomenon may be, its explanation lies altogether in
+its characteristic motions, and, when they are fully
+made out, there will be no more to learn about it. If
+so much be granted, one has got on a long way towards
+the final answer to the questions, What is the nature of
+heat? what is the nature of light? what is the nature
+of electricity? Two of these are settled, and no one
+thinks of asking as to their nature. The nature of
+heat was settled by Rumford and Davy, that it is a form
+of motion in matter. The nature of light was settled
+by Young and Fizeau, that it is a form of motion in
+the ether. What remained to be done was simply to
+discover the particular kind of motion in each case.
+\DPPageSep{241.png}{229}%
+\index{Electricity, origin of}%
+Spectrum analysis and photography have since given
+us the particulars. Electricity is on precisely the same
+philosophical basis; and, in the absence of evidence of
+the existence of some other physical factors than matter,
+the ether, and motion, one would be entitled to the philosophical
+opinion that \emph{electricity must be some form of
+motion}. What the particular form is may be a subject
+of investigation, but not the nature of it.
+
+It is my purpose to show, \emph{first}, that in every case
+where electricity is produced motion of some sort is
+antecedent to its production; \emph{second}, that in every
+case the effect of electricity is to produce motion of
+some sort, and that itself is annihilated in doing it in
+precisely the same sense as motion of any other sort is
+annihilated when it is transformed.
+
+1. \emph{As to its origin}. When the face of the thermopile
+is heated and electricity is produced, we know that
+vibratory molecular motion is the condition for its appearance.
+
+In a galvanic battery the molecular exchanges by
+which zinc is dissolved and oxidized, and hydrogen is
+set free, are well known, and also the heat equivalent
+of such re-actions; and they are measured in heat units,
+which in turn may be made the measure of the electricity
+developed.
+
+When glass or wax or other substance becomes electrified
+by friction, the word itself expresses the condition
+necessary for producing it. Mechanical friction
+is the antecedent.
+
+When a conductor is moved in a magnetic field and
+becomes electrified, the effect depends absolutely upon
+\DPPageSep{242.png}{230}%
+\index{Electricity, mechanical origin}%
+\index{Electricity, electrical origin}%
+the motion. Stop that and all evidence of electricity
+disappears.
+
+The same thing is true when electricity is developed
+by so-called induction in a field produced by a neighboring
+body that is electrified in any way. The continuous
+production of it implies continuous motion of one or
+the other body.
+
+In dynamos of every variety of form the mechanical
+motion turned into them is the antecedent, and the
+energy of the engine spent in turning the dynamo has
+its full representation in the electric energy developed,
+and when there is no motion there is no electricity.
+
+In the physiological development there are always
+chemical, thermal, and mechanical motions, which are
+spent to produce what electrical phenomena appear,
+whether in mankind or in animals.
+
+In the air and in the earth there are changing temperatures,
+condensations, etc., which signify molecular
+motions.
+
+Some crystals, like tourmaline, become electric by
+heating; some, like mica, become electric by splitting;
+and so on. Every one implies that some kind of motion
+has to be spent to develop the electrical condition, and
+in each case the particular kind of motion that has
+been spent to produce it has been \emph{spent}; that is, it has
+been transformed in the same sense that the translatory
+motion of a bullet has been transformed into vibratory
+when it strikes the target. The electricity thus appears
+as the representative of the kind of motion that
+has been destroyed.
+
+Some have imagined that electricity was a kind of
+\DPPageSep{243.png}{231}%
+\index{Electrical effects}%
+\index{Stress, electrical}%
+dual matter, which was broken up by the various processes
+described, or that some substance was transferred
+from one place to another, so that there was
+more than the normal amount in one place and less in
+another. Even such conceptions do not get rid of the
+idea of motion being the chief characteristic, for the
+separations are the ideal embodiments of motion, and
+in this case the measure of it; so nothing whatever is
+gained, either in clearness or simplicity, by such invention.
+
+2. \emph{The effects of electricity} are to bring about mechanical
+motions of some sort.
+
+The stress into which the ether is thrown by either
+an electrified or magnetized body is a change of position
+of adjacent parts with reference to each other,
+and the fact that this stress travels with the velocity
+of light shows that motion is the essence of it. The
+re-action of the stress in the ether upon other matter
+in it always results in the motion of the latter. If the
+whole body can move, it will do so, and mechanical
+motion is the immediate effect. If it cannot move as
+a whole, its molecules are twisted into new positions,
+so that motion, either molar or molecular, is the result.
+
+As the electric current in a conductor always heats
+the latter in every part, one has but to reflect upon the
+character of heat motions to perceive that some kind
+of motion must be the antecedent of it. Consider a
+short portion of wire through which a current of electricity
+flows. It becomes warmer and now radiates
+faster into space. It is losing motion by imparting it
+to the ether. Trace back the ancestry of the ether
+\DPPageSep{244.png}{232}%
+\index{Electrical effects, reversible}%
+\index{Physical processes, reversible}%
+motion, and it appears as vibratory motions of the
+molecules of the conductor, thence as electrical current,
+thence as armature rotations of a dynamo, thence to
+the engine movements, thence to the furnace and the
+chemical re-actions going on there. There is no question
+as to the nature of the factors in all of these but
+one. Call the chemical re-actions \textit{A}, the engine \textit{B},
+the dynamo \textit{C}, the electricity \textit{D}, the heat \textit{E}, and the
+ether waves \textit{F}. With the exception of \textit{D}, each one is
+known to represent a certain kind of motion, molar or
+molecular, and all in a consecutive series. Is it not
+difficult to conceive that the step \textit{D} can be anything
+different in character from the rest of the series, and,
+whether understood or not, must represent some phase
+of motion? To think otherwise is to think that motion
+can have some other antecedent than motion. Whoever
+sets himself in earnest to this problem will see
+there is but one answer to it.
+
+So heat effects, light effects, chemical effects, as
+well as the direct mechanical ones shown in Crookes's
+Tubes, or otherwise, will lead to precisely the same
+conclusion that \emph{electricity represents an intermediate
+molecular kind of motion}, having definite motions
+for its antecedent, and definite motions for its consequent,
+and so must itself be some peculiar form of
+motion, differing from the others as they differ among
+themselves, and nothing beyond that. It may also be
+remarked that every form of motion which is capable,
+under definite mechanical conditions, of developing
+electricity, electricity is itself capable of producing.
+The processes are all reversible. If heat will produce
+\DPPageSep{245.png}{233}%
+electricity, electricity will produce heat. If chemical
+re-actions produce electricity, electricity will produce
+chemical re-actions, and so on of all the rest; so if they
+be reducible to motions, so must electricity.
+
+Such considerations make logically certain what the
+nature of electricity is; but they do not indicate what
+the character of the motions is that gives it identity,
+and distinguishes it so radically from other well-known
+kinds of motion. In the chapter on ``Motion'' it is
+pointed out that there are three fundamental kinds of
+motions,---translatory, vibratory, and rotary,---and
+that with these all the various complicated motions of
+mechanical processes may be produced. It is also
+pointed out that for convenience we call those motions
+mechanical that are on a scale of visible magnitude,
+but such as cannot be seen are called molecular and
+atomic. It is plain, in this case, that the motions must
+be on a molecular scale, for no motions are directly
+perceived in electrical phenomena any more than in
+heat phenomena; so there remains for consideration
+what evidence there is for the motion being molecular
+and therefore of matter, or of the ether.
+
+It appears that when certain kinds of work, such as
+friction, are spent upon a mass of ordinary matter, electricity
+is developed, and we say the body is electrified.
+The body in this condition at once re-acts upon the
+ether about it; and it has happened that some persons
+have given most attention to this effect of the electrified
+body, and the phenomena that may result from it,
+and have called \emph{it} electricity; while others have given
+more attention to the condition of the matter that
+\DPPageSep{246.png}{234}%
+\index{Electricity, dual}%
+\index{Ether rotations}%
+induced the ether stress, and they have called \emph{that}
+electricity; while the greater number have hopelessly
+confused the two, calling both by the same name, just
+as formerly heat and ether waves were both called
+heat. It is plain that a physical condition of things in
+matter requiring a name ought not to be designated by
+the same term as that physical condition in the ether
+which is the result of the first. One is, therefore,
+justified by the logical necessity of making a distinction,
+in adopting the name electricity as applicable to
+one and not the other, and also in calling the phenomenon
+in matter by that name and denying its applicability
+to any effect of it wherever it is plain there has
+been a transformation. Thus it would be as illogical
+to call ether waves set up by an electrified body electrical
+waves, as it would be to call the swinging of a
+pendulum that was actuated by electrical attractions
+electrical vibrations.
+
+We are, therefore, now reduced to the sole consideration
+as to the character of those molecular motions
+which differentiate electricity from heat and free-path
+motion; and here the apparent dual character, which
+has been so puzzling, helps at once to an understanding
+of it.
+
+For many years it has been merely a matter of convention
+that a current of electricity is said to move in
+a certain direction in a wire. It has often been noticed
+that there is an apparent current in both directions
+from any electrical source; and one has been called a
+positive, the other a negative, one; yet the current,
+reckoned either way from its source, is always the
+\DPPageSep{247.png}{235}%
+\index{Magnetic rotation}%
+\index{Rotations in ether}%
+same at a given point, and has not unfrequently been
+considered as made up of two currents moving in
+opposite directions.
+
+If one will take a limp rope a few feet long and tie
+its ends together so as to form a ring, and, holding it
+in his two hands, will begin to twist it in one direction,
+he will see the twist start in opposite directions at his
+hands, and each one can be traced quite round the ring,
+neither interfering with the other; yet one is a right-handed
+twist, the other a left-handed one; and one
+might call one a positive and the other a negative current.
+There will be as much twist in one part of the
+rope as in any other, and the rate of rotation at the
+hands will be the measure of the amount of motion,
+and, consequently, of the energy that is in the circuit.
+For a rope substitute a wire, and for the hands a
+battery or a dynamo, and the analogy is complete,
+except that no rotation is seen in the wire as a whole;
+so, if there be rotations, they must be of molecules and
+not of the mass. Molecular motions must, of course,
+be inferential. It is so for heat. The waves called
+ether waves imply vibrations of matter; and, if there
+be any known rotary motions in the ether, they would
+imply molecular rotations for the same reason. It is
+conceded that in every electro-magnetic field the ether
+is in a rotary motion, and in numerous books it is
+pictured as a whirl both about a magnet and a wire
+carrying an electric current. The rotation of an electric
+arc in a magnetic field shows it, and the twist
+given to a polarized ray of light in passing through it
+also shows it; and it has been so interpreted for years.
+\DPPageSep{248.png}{236}%
+The twist given to a conductor through which a current
+is flowing, which has been before alluded to, also
+gives direct evidence of the same condition; so the
+phenomena confirm the conjecture that the phenomenon
+in matter which is called \emph{electricity is a phenomenon
+of rotating molecules}, in the same sense as the
+phenomenon called heat is a phenomenon of vibrating
+molecules.
+
+If the atoms in molecules, and the molecules themselves,
+were absolutely fixed in position so as to have
+no individual freedom of motion, there could be neither
+vibration nor rotation; but the vibrations tend continually
+to separate them, and hence between impacts
+there is freedom for rotary slip, if there be any tendency
+to do so. In an electro-magnetic field the ether
+stress re-acts upon molecules in it so as to rotate them
+upon some axis tending to set them in certain position
+with reference to it. This action will be stronger upon
+an atom or molecule immediately adjacent to an electrified
+molecule than to one more distant, and one may
+therefore infer that the process called conduction,
+where heat is the immediate effect of an electric current,
+is really an induction effect, and depends directly
+upon the ether rather than upon the direct mechanical
+effect of one molecule upon another; for such mechanical
+action would make the rotation of adjacent molecules
+to be opposite in direction, whereas in an electric
+current all are in one direction. There is, therefore,
+impact and slip, impact and slip; each impact knocking
+the molecule out of the position the induction had
+set it in, and each arrest of the slip resulting in increasing
+\DPPageSep{249.png}{237}%
+the amplitude of vibration, and hence raising
+the temperature of the conductor. Hence, the explanation
+of the transformation of electrical energy
+into heat energy. An electric current is, therefore,
+not a simple phenomenon, but is considerably complicated,
+involving motions of both molecules and the
+ether; the molecular motion depending directly upon
+the re-action of the ether stress produced by an adjacent
+molecule rather than upon mechanical contact.
+The electrical condition called static being itself a
+compound of abnormal molecular position and stressed
+ether, is the condition which, while being propagated
+in a conductor, constitutes an electric current, propagated
+in the ether, constitutes an ether wave.
+%\DPPageSep{250.png}{238}%
+
+
+\Chapter{IX}{Chemism}{238}
+
+\label{chap:chemism}%
+\index{Chemism}%
+
+\First{The} atomic theory of matter was held in some form
+by ancient philosophers, but the reasons they assigned
+for their opinion were not such reasons as have led
+men of the present day to adopt that theory to the exclusion
+of all others. Modern chemical analysis enables
+one to reduce compound substances to their elementary
+forms, and out of those to build up numerous
+other substances with entirely different qualities.
+Each such elementary form can be isolated, its properties
+can be studied, and by compounding them one can
+at will produce thousands of substances, each with its
+own distinctive qualities. Some of the more thoughtful
+men of all ages have pondered upon the fundamental
+questions of physical science, and they have guessed
+how it might be: some guessed this way, some guessed
+that, and none of them gave a sufficient reason. It
+would be very remarkable if, among a multitude of
+guessers, some did not guess nearer right than others;
+but such lucky guessing hardly entitles one to the
+honor of being the founder of a philosophy that had
+to wait for later men and entirely different methods to
+substantiate it. And this is the real state of the case
+in nearly all departments of knowledge. Ask any chemist
+\DPPageSep{251.png}{239}%
+\index{Atoms, chemical properties}%
+to-day why he holds the atomic theory of matter, and
+he will reply that he can isolate the elements, and by no
+process yet discovered can they be more finely divided;
+that he can measure their individual magnitude and
+weigh them, prove their existence in the sun and stars;
+so that the weight of evidence is exceedingly great.
+He will never think of assigning any such reasons as
+the early philosophers gave for their teaching. Many
+of the properties of bodies of visible magnitude depend
+upon the number and arrangement of the molecules
+that compose them, but the properties of atoms are
+fundamental and not subject to change. All substances
+are identified by means of their properties, and the
+chemical properties of atoms are among the most important.
+Not only do atoms combine together in groups
+called molecules, consisting of two or more atoms, but
+they combine in definite proportions by weight, and only
+so; and these proportions are called the atomic weights
+of the elements, and are known for all of them; so
+that molecules are compounds of definite constituents,
+definite weight, and possessing definite properties. For
+instance, water is made up of hydrogen and oxygen, two
+parts by weight of hydrogen and sixteen of oxygen;
+and as to its properties, such as density, specific gravity,
+conditions at different temperatures, etc., all are familiar
+with. Most of these properties of bodies are called
+physical, but by chemical properties is meant the
+ability of atoms to enter into definite combinations
+with other atoms, to form new compounds and develop
+new properties. The chemist is concerned with such
+atomic exchanges, called re-actions, and notes the conditions
+\DPPageSep{252.png}{240}%
+\index{Affinity, chemical}%
+under which they take place, and some of the
+new qualities that appear, such as its physical condition,
+as to being a solid, a liquid, or a gas at certain
+temperatures, its crystalline form, if it has any, its
+behavior with polarized light, and so on.
+
+Underneath all chemical re-actions there lies the
+question as to why atoms combine at all. At first it was
+explained as due to an attractive force,---chemical attraction,
+possessed by all atoms, but in different degrees
+by different elements. When it became known that
+this acted in definite selective ways, it was called chemical
+affinity, but was still supposed to be a peculiar
+force unrelated to other forces supposed to exist, such
+as heat, light, electricity, and so on. In the progress of
+knowledge, it became apparent that these latter phenomena
+were so directly related to each other that they
+were capable of being transformed one into the other,
+and then the expression ``correlation of forces'' began
+to be used. A further analysis showed them to differ
+from each other chiefly in the character of the motion
+involved in the phenomena; and so forces, as such, have
+been banished from physical science, leaving not even
+a single primal force; for as each one can be changed
+at will into any of the others there is simply a closed
+chain of phenomena, no one of which can be called an
+elementary one more than any other.
+
+Chemical phenomena have been found to be a part of
+the same grand division, and the term ``chemical affinity''
+has itself been in a measure supplanted by the
+term ``chemism,'' which is now used to signify the
+quality possessed by atoms to enter into definite combinations;
+\DPPageSep{253.png}{241}%
+\index{Chemism and heat}%
+and its explanation is to be found by noting
+the factors present when atomic and molecular exchanges
+take place, and these have been found to be all
+physical without exception. There is a large field
+known as chemical physics with which one needs to be
+acquainted in order to understand simple chemical
+operations; namely, the effects of heat, light, and
+electricity in bringing about chemical changes.
+
+When hydrogen combines with oxygen to form water
+the process is called a chemical one; but, as has been
+pointed out in the subject ``Heat,'' there is a definite
+amount of heat given out by the combination of a definite
+amount of the elements; and in like manner the
+dissociation of the elements in water requires the expenditure
+of energy proportionate to the amount decomposed.
+This too is called a chemical process, but
+the conditions for doing either are purely physical, depending
+absolutely upon heat. The elements cannot
+combine when heat cannot be given out, and cannot be
+separated except by an equal expenditure. What is
+true for this example is true in degree for all other
+chemical re-actions; physical energy is involved in every
+change and is the condition for the change. The first
+law of thermo-dynamics states the quantitative relation
+between heat and mechanical work; viz., that it is measurable
+in foot pounds, and is equal to $772$ foot pounds
+per pound degree, and this is called a heat unit. Now,
+the chemical combination of a pound of hydrogen with
+oxygen gives $61,000$ heat units, and is therefore at once
+measureable in foot pounds, showing a direct relation
+between chemical re-actions and heat or work.
+\DPPageSep{254.png}{242}%
+
+It has also been discovered by experiment that in the
+absence of heat chemical re-actions cannot go on, and
+this has led chemists to the conclusion that at absolute
+zero chemism does not exist. There is not only no
+selective action, but no cohesion among atoms, and all
+molecules would fall to pieces---that is, to atoms, quite
+dissociated---at absolute zero. Instead of requiring
+\index{Absolute zero}%
+\Pagelabel{242}%
+$61,000$ heat units to dissociate a pound of hydrogen
+from water, it would not require any, for if the atoms
+do not cohere, no work would need to be done in order
+to separate them.\footnote
+ {See Appendix, \Pageref{p.}{400}.} %[** PP: Original reads p. 399]
+
+From this, then, it appears that chemism is determined
+by heat, and does not exist in the absence of
+temperature. When it is developed it manifests itself
+in selective ways, and in the formation of definite compounds;
+and it therefore is a proper subject of inquiry
+as to how the temperature of atoms can give such selective
+qualities to them. This requires a reconsideration
+of the distinctive quality of heat itself. It has been
+pointed out that this consists in the internal vibratory
+motions of atoms and molecules, as distinguished from
+translatory and rotary motions; that the evidence for
+this comes, first, from the fact that a body of any size
+possessing any degree of heat---that is, having a temperature
+above absolute zero---is constantly exchanging
+its energy with the ether, and that the rate of the exchange
+depends upon the temperature; and, second, that
+translatory motions of bodies in ether do not require
+the expenditure of energy, or, in other words, that for
+such motions the ether is frictionless. This is the
+same as saying that, where the heat of a body is lost by
+\DPPageSep{255.png}{243}%
+\index{Atoms, vibrations of}%
+radiation, it is the internal vibratory motion alone that
+is lost, not its translatory velocity. Consider a body of
+any magnitude whatever, having any temperature whatever,
+and moving at any assignable velocity in space.
+After an interval it will have lost some of its temperature
+by radiation, and, if it moves long enough, it might
+lose it all, reaching absolute zero; but its translatory
+velocity will not therefore be reduced in any degree.
+Hence, in considering the heat in a body, independent
+of any other motions it may have, one has only to do
+with its internal vibratory movements, and that the
+temperature of a body, say an atom, is measured by
+the amplitude of its vibration, and is proportional to the
+square of that amplitude.
+
+If, therefore, chemism is directly related to heat, one
+must attend to what must be going on in an atom, not
+groups of them.
+
+To say that an atom vibrates is to say that it is
+changing its form, and to explain how changing its form
+can result in such selective properties as atoms exhibit
+is to explain chemism by the mechanics of the motion
+involved. Whether atoms have one form or another
+will make no difference in this argument, which is that
+the result is due to change of form, whatever that may
+be; but, for making the subject mechanically clear, some
+form may be adopted, and one can do no better than to
+choose that form which now has most probability in its
+favor judged by other phenomena; that is, the vortex-ring,
+which has been treated under the head of ``The
+Ether.''
+
+When such a body vibrates in its simple way it
+\DPPageSep{256.png}{244}%
+\index{Attraction of vortex rings}%
+elongates alternately on two axes at right angles to
+each other; that is, the change in form is from a circle
+to an ellipse, so as to assume first a horizontal, then a
+vertical elliptical form, as shown in the cut. Such
+%[Illustration: \textsc{Diag.~29.}]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{256a}
+ \Caption{29}{Diag.\ 29.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+changes are due to the elasticity of
+the ring, and are brought about in
+such an atom by impact, by friction,
+and by absorption of ether waves.
+Whether produced in one way or
+another, they represent absorbed energy
+and exhibit it as heat, the temperature
+of a given one depending upon the amplitude
+given to it by a definite amount of energy however
+applied.
+
+Such changing forms imply nodes and loops in the
+vibrating body, positions of minimum and maximum
+motions; and when the vibratory rate is the fundamental
+one,---that is, the lowest rate the body can have,---there
+will be four of each, the nodes being the positions of
+minimum change of form. Such nodes may be seen in
+vibrating bodies of all sorts,---strings, bells, rods, pipes,
+and rings. The size of a body makes no difference in
+this characteristic, and it therefore may be affirmed of
+atoms as well as of any other magnitudes.
+
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.5in}{258a}
+ \Caption{30}{Diag.\ 30.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+Let it be admitted that vibrating atoms can cohere
+for any reason, it will be seen that an atom such as
+represented could only have other atoms attached to it,
+and be in a stable condition, when they were at the
+nodes; and in this case four might be so attached and
+no more, if they were approximately of the same size.
+Such places in atoms might be called bonds: they would
+\DPPageSep{257.png}{unnumbered}%
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{3.75in}{257a}
+ \end{center}
+ \caption{Geometrical Forms of Snow Flakes.}
+\index{Crystallization}%
+\end{figure}
+\DPPageSep{258.png}{245}%
+be definite in number, position, and strength. If the
+other attached atoms were themselves
+vibrating, they
+would each have their own
+nodes; and if they were free
+to turn into any position, one
+might be sure that the nodes
+of each would be in contact,
+and that the loops of the vibratory
+motions would be where
+space to move in without interruption
+was free. Such a combination
+of atoms might be called a molecule. It would
+consist of a definite number of atoms, each with its own
+atomic weight; and if the strength of
+the cohesion depended upon the vibratory
+motion, it is easily seen that when
+there was quiescence in that there
+would be disruption or dissociation.
+%[Illustrations]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \hfil
+ \begin{minipage}{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{258b}
+ \Caption{31}{Diag.\ 31.}
+ \end{minipage}
+ \hfil
+ \begin{minipage}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.5in}{258c}
+ \Caption{32}{Diag.\ 32.}
+ \end{minipage}
+ \hfil
+ \end{center}
+\end{figure}
+Moreover, when there was such a nodal
+bond it would be like a hinge, and two thus united
+could swing upon it; while if three were thus united
+and two were to swing upwards,
+they would meet at a node on
+each and stick together for the
+same reason the other nodes did,
+thus forming a symmetrical and
+stable figure against which other
+similar ones could be built up,
+node against node indefinitely. A
+hexagonal figure would result. If four were attached
+to the primary nodes, and each was to swing up ninety
+\DPPageSep{259.png}{246}%
+\index{Chemical field}%
+\index{Fields, chemical}%
+\index{Fields, mechanical}%
+degrees, there would be formed a sort of cubical box
+without a lid; but at the top will be presented four
+open nodes, upon which the four nodes of any other
+similar one might be placed: and thus could a cubical
+structure be built by addition of similar forms indefinitely.
+Such symmetrical forms are called crystals.
+
+Of course all this presupposes that there is some
+good mechanical reason for atomic cohesion, that is in
+some way dependent upon temperature; and to make
+this clear it is needful, first, to call to mind some phenomena
+of a similar sort on a larger scale.
+
+It is well known that if a light body be brought near
+a vibrating tuning-fork, the latter acts as if it attracted
+it, for the light body will move towards the fork. The
+same thing is true of other vibrating bodies, and the
+explanation is that the vibratory motion reduces the
+pressure about the body. Thus, suppose the hand to
+move to and fro; as it moves forward the air in front
+of it is somewhat condensed, while that behind it is
+partially rarefied; when the hand returns the same
+thing happens. The air follows up the hand because
+the pressure is reduced next the hand, and if the hand
+could swing back and forth, faster than the air could
+return to it, there would be formed a perfect air vacuum;
+and that means that the pressure would be
+nothing at the hand and fifteen pounds per square
+inch at a distance from it. Hence any body placed near
+the hand would be subject to a pressure greater on its
+remote side than on the side adjacent to the hand, and
+would be pushed by it towards the hand. This would
+be a phenomenon similar to attraction, the movement
+\DPPageSep{260.png}{unnumbered}%
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{260a}
+
+ \scriptsize CRYSTALLINE FORMS.\\[6pt]
+ \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
+ The above figures illustrate very clearly the molecular arrangement in crystals of
+ various kinds. \textit{A}~represents a cross section of Brazilian Topaz, as shown in polarized
+ light. \textit{B}~is a hollow faced cube of salt, and \textit{C}~a similar hollow faced octahedron of
+ copper sulphide. They show that the cohesive strength is greater on the edges than
+ elsewhere. Some crystals, when being dissolved, leave a complete skeleton of themselves
+ the last to disappear. \textit{D}~is a skeleton crystal of silver from Scotland, where the
+ structure consists of a series of minute octahedral crystals adhering to each other in
+ such directions as would build up a single large octahedral crystal if filled out.
+ \end{minipage}
+ \end{center}
+\end{figure}
+\DPPageSep{261.png}{247}%
+\index{Crystallization}%
+\index{Vibrations, sympathetic}%
+towards the vibrating body being due directly to the
+pressure of the medium, while the difference in the
+medium would itself be directly due to the vibratory
+movement. The amount of such difference in pressure
+is evidently determined by the degree of vibration.
+Now, if one can imagine a similar condition of things
+about an atom vibrating in the ether, he can understand
+how its vibratory movements might reduce the ether
+pressure adjacent to it in a way proportional to the
+movement, and also how at the nodes such effect would
+be at a minimum, and at the loops at a maximum, so
+there would be produced what is called a field. As the
+condition that produced it was one of mechanical
+motion, one might call the field a mechanical field, for
+mechanical effects of translatory motion result from it.
+
+When such an effect takes place among atoms one
+might distinguish it as a \emph{chemical} field, for it would
+bring about mutual cohesion among atoms, and the
+nodes would determine the positions of stable combinations;
+and a molecule so built up would require an
+amount of energy spent upon it to break it up equivalent
+to the energy spent, to produce the field, or, in
+other words, equivalent to the heat in the atom.
+
+It is here to be noted that when atoms combine in
+this way each one retains abundant space for its heat
+movements, so its temperature may be varied within
+considerable limits without interfering with molecular
+stability. And, if the vibratory movements continue,
+then each molecule will have its own field, which will
+be the resultant of all the fields of the atoms that are
+combined thus to make the molecule. The field of a
+\DPPageSep{262.png}{248}%
+\index{Growth}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+molecule will then have a form which will depend
+absolutely upon the number and arrangement of the
+constituent atoms, and will extend to some distance in
+space beyond the geometric boundary of the molecule
+itself.
+
+The presence of such a chemical field must affect
+other chemical fields in the neighboring space where
+the fields overlap, hindering or facilitating the exchange
+of atoms in other molecules, because lessening the
+pressure holding them together. There are many
+examples of this kind of action known. It is called
+catalysis, which signifies the action of a given substance
+\index{Catalysis}%
+in bringing about chemical reactions without
+itself being changed. For example, the binoxide of
+manganese, when mixed with the chlorate of potash,
+greatly facilitates its decomposition by heat, though
+the binoxide is itself not decomposed. Pure zinc is
+dissolved with difficulty by sulphuric acid; but a little
+mercury or iron, or other so-called impurity, enables it
+to be dissolved freely. Hydrogen and oxygen gases will
+not combine when simply mixed; but a little spongy
+platinum placed in the mixture will at once bring about
+the combination, but will itself suffer no chemical
+change. These gases will also slowly combine in the
+presence of mercury when kept at the temperature of~$305°$.
+In glass vessels without the mercury no combination
+at that temperature occurs, but on raising the temperature
+to~$448°$ it combines very slowly. In smelting
+operations a flux has a similar function, and in some
+cases the boundary line of such action can be observed.
+Some re-actions take place at a different rate near the
+\DPPageSep{263.png}{249}%
+sides of the vessel that contains the solution than away
+from it, and some mixtures of substances in solution
+will separate from each other except within a short distance
+from the surface. Such phenomena show that
+the mere presence of some substances is sufficient to
+profoundly affect chemical re-actions. The chemical
+field of substances gives a consistent explanation of
+catalysis. There is another class of phenomena well
+known, but hitherto without any rational explanation;
+viz., some supersaturated solutions seem unable to initiate
+the process of crystallization, but the smallest crystal
+of the substance starts it, and the whole body is
+solidified in a few seconds. Here it is evident that the
+crystal, taken as a nucleus, had a field that compelled
+other and similar molecular groups to arrange themselves
+in similar order. This is a phenomenon of such
+importance as to warrant some attention here. When
+two tuning-forks having the same pitch are separate
+from each other a distance of several feet, and one of
+them be made to produce a sound, the other one will be
+made to sound likewise by the action of the sound
+waves in the air upon it. The effect is called sympathetic
+vibration. Other forks having different rates of
+vibration will not be similarly affected, so the vibrations
+in the air select out the particular fork having the same
+rate as the one vibrating, and cause it to enter into a
+similar state of vibration. So it appears with a magnet.
+Any magnetic bodies in its field become magnetized
+there; that is, they are brought into the same physical
+state as the body that incited the field. Such physical
+fields, then, are capable of compelling bodies in them
+\DPPageSep{264.png}{250}%
+\index{Fields, magnetic}%
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+\Pagelabel{252}%
+to assume the same state of motion or similar position,
+or both, as the body that produced the field, provided
+the substance itself be constituted molecularly like the
+first,---and this simply by being in proximity, not by
+contact. It is a kind of induction, common through
+the whole domain of physics. In the organic world of
+living things the phenomenon of growth is manifested
+by what are called cells, which are symmetrical groups
+of molecules, as crystals are, only much more complex.
+Growth consists in the formation of similar cells out of
+suitable molecular constituents in the neighborhood.
+Each different part of a plant or animal has a different
+cell structure. If, therefore, it be conceded that each
+cell has a field, which is the resultant of all the elements
+that make it up, it will be seen how such field
+must act upon other matter within it, compelling it to
+assume a form similar to the cell that produces the
+field; that is, to form a similar cell adjacent to itself.
+Such formation is called growth; but the similarity in
+form and function, when appearing among plants or
+animals, has been considered as due to heredity, a term
+that has a definite enough meaning, but which has not
+been supposed to be due to mechanical necessity but
+to some super-physical agency not amenable to purely
+physical laws and conditions. It is possible to pursue
+this much further and to show that cell structure itself
+may be modified by molecular fields, and how stability
+of form and function are possible with some and not
+with others,---how what in natural history is called
+variability, reversion, and other phenomena of the sort,
+are explicable as due to the same factors that \DPtypo{organizes}{organize}
+\DPPageSep{265.png}{251}%
+atoms into molecules, and molecules into crystals.
+Every one interested in the fundamental questions of
+chemistry will be able to follow out in many ways the
+mechanical conceptions here introduced, and compare
+what he knows of chemical re-actions with them. It
+will be especially helpful for one to draw upon paper
+such ideal atomic rings with their edges touching, and
+marking where the nodes must be. Such diagrams as
+the one on \hyperref[fig:30]{p.~\pageref{fig:30}, fig.~30}, thus drawn, cut out, and the
+parts bent up until they touch each other, will probably
+surprise one at first to find how the nodes will be
+brought adjacent to each other and therefore into a
+stable position.
+
+So far it has been assumed that there will be in the
+ether about a vibrating atom an effect comparable with
+the effect produced in air about a tuning-fork or other
+vibrating body that is producing sound waves. One
+might be satisfied that there was such an action, even
+though he were not able to explain it, provided there
+were good reason for the assumption. The case is the
+same as for a magnetic field within which magnetic
+phenomena take place, though a magnetic field cannot
+be isolated. It is the same for the existence of the
+ether itself: it is inferential, but from a large body of
+phenomena of different sorts, all corroborating the hypothesis;
+so one is satisfied. When a magnet acts upon
+a piece of iron not in contact with itself, we explain the
+action by the magnetic field; and, if a body acts chemically
+upon other bodies not in immediate contact, controlling
+their motions and positions, as is the case, the
+same kind of an assumption is to be entertained. If a
+\DPPageSep{266.png}{252}%
+\index{Heat, effects}%
+reasonable explanation for the existence of the field
+can be offered, all the better, though no one holds more
+lightly upon a magnetic field because he cannot explain
+it. In the chapter on magnetism it is remarked that
+there is good reason to think that atoms of all kinds
+are magnets. If that be the case, then every atom has
+a field of its own, wherever it may be; and it would
+seem likely that this magnetic field of atoms was the
+underlying factor in the so-called chemical field; and it
+is therefore well to analyze the phenomena, having that
+magnetic field in mind.
+
+A single magnet of any form will have its field
+under all conditions, and the \emph{shape of the field will be
+determined by the form of the magnet}. If the magnet
+were of sufficient size, there would be no difficulty in
+locating it by its field, even though the magnet itself
+could not be seen. A number of magnets arranged
+promiscuously would so neutralize each other's fields
+as to have no residual field, and in order to detect the
+existence of magnetism it would be needful to get very
+close to an individual magnet. When a steel magnet
+is dissolved in an acid all evidence of the existence of
+magnetism disappears, for the iron molecules are now
+separated from each other and are scattered promiscuously
+through the solution. Any disturbance whatever
+that disarranges the magnetic arrangement of
+molecules destroys the evidence of the magnetic field,
+except at very short distances. When a piece of iron
+is heated to redness it cannot be made magnetic in
+the ordinary sense; for the vigor of the vibratory movement
+continually knocks the molecules into new positions,
+\DPPageSep{267.png}{253}%
+and therefore changes their resultant fields,
+leaving but a neutral effect upon outside bodies.
+
+As chemical re-actions take place in liquids or gases,
+and only exceedingly slow in solids, it follows that in
+them one has to deal with molecules in all positions,---that
+is, an entirely disordered arrangement, and such as
+would exhibit no evidence of magnetic field, even though
+every atom was itself a strong magnet; and this condition
+of neutrality would be constant so long as the
+temperature kept up so much mechanical disturbance
+as to prevent any systematic arrangement. Yet it is
+to be borne in mind that the magnetic field of no one
+has been \DPtypo{distroyed}{destroyed}: it is as strong, as far reaching, as
+ever; but it is masked by overlying fields,---that is all.
+Let any one of them suffer any change at all, and the
+effect of it would be felt throughout the whole space
+the field would occupy if there were no other one in
+its neighborhood.
+
+Now, when the form of a magnet is changed, it
+changes the form of the magnetic field---that is, the
+distribution of the stress that constitutes the field; and,
+when an atomic magnet vibrates, it is changing its
+form; and as a result its field is changing at the same
+rate. A multitude of such independent magnets, all
+changing their forms and fields, would be sending out
+waves into the ether; but they would be caused by and
+measured by their heat motions, not by their magnetic
+condition simply; and the effects of these waves at a
+distance from their source would be practical uniformity
+unless the waves were very long. For such short ones
+as are produced by atomic and molecular vibrations
+\DPPageSep{268.png}{254}%
+there could be no ordinary indications of a magnetic
+field such as are exhibited in the movements of bodies
+of visible magnitude. Long waves of precisely the
+same sort caused by motions of a slower rate might
+make magnetic needles move. Thus, magnetic needles
+upon the earth have been observed to move at the
+same instant that solar disturbances have been witnessed
+through a telescope, which indicates that the
+waves were long ones, giving a magnet time to move
+one way before it was impelled to move in some other
+way.
+
+This condition of practical neutrality on account of
+the rapidity of the change at a distance from the magnetic
+body would not hold true in close proximity to
+the body itself; for the changes in the field will not
+only be actually greater there, but the fact that there
+are nodes and loops necessitates changes in the stress
+at the surface of the atom, and renders it possible for
+the actual magnetism to assert itself and act upon
+another very near to it which it cannot have in any
+degree a little farther away, the actual distance being
+comparable with the diameter of the atom itself. Hence,
+atoms close by would have certain magnetic effects
+upon each other in the nature of selective effects, on
+account of the uniformity of the stress at the nodes,
+and the number of nodes would determine the possible
+number of cohesive attachments. So one may fairly
+presume that the vibratory motions such as constitute
+the heat motions of atoms are the physical conditions
+that underlie chemical combinations and give to them
+their quantitative character, their selective property,
+\DPPageSep{269.png}{255}%
+\index{Sound, origin of}%
+and their symmetrical form into which they arrange
+themselves.
+
+This gives a rational account of so-called chemical
+attraction, and makes it clear how the laws of thermo-dynamics
+are related to chemical re-actions. It reduces
+the whole scheme to one of the mechanics of vibrating
+magnets; and the evidence that atoms are such magnets
+does not rest upon the necessity of the conception for
+the hypothesis, but upon much confirmatory experiment
+that has led physicists to the conclusion that
+they are such, in a manner quite independent of what
+phenomena might be deducible from matter with such
+a constitution. In conclusion, it may be added that,
+although the idea of ring-formed atoms has been
+adhered to in this explanation, it is not to be understood
+that the same explanation would not apply to
+atoms constituted in any other manner; for all that is
+implied in the above is that whatever their form and
+substance they are magnets, and that they are so elastic
+as to be capable of internal vibratory movements---that
+is, of changing their forms in a periodic way;
+and of this there appears to be no reasonable doubt.
+When several such are combined together the resultant
+motions and their effects become very complicated, and
+therefore difficult to disentangle; but that would be no
+reason for not holding a well-grounded conviction that
+all chemical phenomena are truly physical, and referable
+to fundamental mechanical laws, and are fully explained
+when these mechanical conditions are pointed out.
+%\DPPageSep{270.png}{256}%
+
+
+\Chapter{X}{Sound}{256}
+
+\First{The} term ``sound'' has two very different sign\-i\-fi\-ca\-tions,---one
+a physiological one referring to a sensation
+in the organ of hearing, the other the physical cause of
+the sensation. When one has the sensation of sound,
+of course he usually infers that it was caused by some
+external physical condition that has in some way impressed
+itself upon his auditory apparatus; and, to one
+who has thought but little about it, it is difficult to get
+rid of the idea that sound is a something which exists,
+whether it be heard or not. That is, there would still
+be sound though there were no ears, that a tumbling
+pile of books in a deserted house would make a racket
+if no one did hear it. On the other hand, one may
+call that sound which is capable of being heard; and
+when those conditions are investigated it is found, in
+all cases, to be some kind of a mechanical impulse, or
+succession of impulses, generally in the air, which may
+be traced from the ear to some body which is found to
+be in a state of vibration. The latter is called a
+sounding body, and the air is called a sound conductor;
+but these conditions are not necessary for the
+sensation of sound. One may not infrequently hear
+what is called ringing in the ears, that has its origin
+within the head, and, perhaps, in some cases independent
+\DPPageSep{271.png}{257}%
+\index{Pitch}%
+of any of the auditory apparatus, like some
+nerve disturbance even at the base of the brain itself.
+Hence there is a distinction between hearing and the
+cause of hearing, and the latter does not necessarily
+imply anything external to the listener. One may be
+deaf so that no conditions external or internal will
+produce the sensation. As the sensation itself can
+give no infallible testimony as to what causes it, it has
+come about that the physical conditions which may be
+heard as sound have been investigated, and the science
+of sound, or acoustics, has been developed quite independent
+of the sense of hearing, the latter being only
+a convenient instrumentality in the investigation, not
+an indispensable one. In this sense sound is the
+science of the vibratory movements of elastic bodies,
+and one may inquire first as to the origin of such
+movements. When one body strikes upon another,
+motion is imparted to the latter. If enough motion is
+imparted, it may move visibly, and we then call such
+motion mechanical. Though it does not visibly move,
+yet energy has been spent upon it in some degree, and
+must be represented by some degree of motion which
+at first it did not have. If a pencil be struck upon the
+table, one may be as sure that energy has been spent
+upon it as if it had been struck with the fist, only
+less in amount.
+
+When molecules are compressed together so as to
+increase the density, and retained in such closer compactness,
+heat is always the result; that is, the molecules
+themselves have their amplitude of vibration
+increased: but when molecules are compressed quickly,
+\DPPageSep{272.png}{258}%
+and the pressure be as quickly removed, the compressed
+molecules at once rebound to their original
+position with a velocity that depends upon the degree
+of elasticity the body has, and, like a swinging pendulum,
+do not stop at once when they have reached that
+position, but go beyond a little, and thus oscillate back
+and forth. Each molecule pushes against its neighbors,
+and they upon theirs, and so on, the motion travelling
+outwards from the point of disturbance in every direction,
+with a velocity that is proportionate to the temperature;
+that is, the vibratory rate of the molecules
+themselves, which, as pointed out in the chapter on
+heat, is exceedingly great.
+
+This particular kind of movement is called longitudinal;
+that is, it is to and fro in the direction in
+which the disturbance travels, and depends altogether
+upon the properties of the body that is struck, and not in
+any degree upon the initiating cause. When the table
+is struck with the pencil the sound heard is different in
+quality from that given out by a similar stroke upon
+the window or a tumbler. It differs also in duration.
+The latter may continue to be heard for some seconds,
+while the former is brief. Every elastic body has some
+particular vibratory rate, which depends upon its size
+and shape as well as the material it is composed of.
+A stretched string or wire, a board, a lath, a bridge,
+a house, for examples, all have individual rates of
+motion, into which they can be brought by some well-directed,
+sudden push. When a strong wind shakes a
+house, the shake is the vibratory rate of the building,
+and may be as low as one or two per second. In
+\DPPageSep{273.png}{259}%
+general, as bodies are smaller their rate of vibration
+increases, until it becomes greater than thirty or forty
+per second, when the effect can be heard. Stones
+have an individual pitch, or rate of vibration, so that
+by selection one may get a set to represent the musical
+scale when struck. Smooth bits of laths of different
+lengths give out their pitch when dropped upon
+a table; and, with a properly graded set, tunes may be
+played by dropping them successively. The rate of
+vibration, or pitch, of a table is relatively high---several
+hundred per second; and a pencil knock distributed
+over so large a body, and by it to the floor, reduces its
+strength very fast. The tumbler has its motions
+symmetrical, therefore of greater amplitude, and last
+longer. A tuning-fork struck and held in the fingers
+near the ear will be heard for a much longer time than
+if the stem be held against the table, as any one may
+satisfy himself by trying. In the latter case the
+motions are conducted away freely, in the former case
+not so freely. In the former case the sound appears
+louder to the ear, because the air, in contact with the
+vibrating table, receives vibratory motions from it as
+well as directly from the fork; and so the air motions
+are re-enforced, and the energy is dissipated so much
+the more rapidly.
+
+The idea in all this is that, so far as sound consists
+in vibratory motions, energy is involved, and is distributed
+in accordance with mechanical laws; the size,
+density, and elasticity of the sounding body being the
+factors which determine the rate at which the distribution
+can go on.
+\DPPageSep{274.png}{260}%
+\index{Sound, characteristics}%
+
+If the motion be properly mechanical, any agency
+that can originate such motions can give rise to sound.
+One might ask himself here if it be likely that any
+kind of motion, or form of energy, cannot produce it.
+If it be remembered that motion is the antecedent of
+motion in all known cases, one will perceive that
+sound might have a variety of antecedents, as it has.
+To the mechanical ones alluded to might be added
+all cases of percussion, impact, friction---indeed, the
+whole range of mechanical motions. Any agency that
+can change the form of a body can cause sound vibrations.
+
+That heat can directly produce sound is shown by
+the roar of fire in furnaces; and tubes having a burning
+gas-jet in them may give out a loud sound. In
+these cases it is the body of air that is caused to
+vibrate energetically\DPtypo{}{.}
+
+When a beam of light falls upon a body that can be
+heated by it there is a re-action between the surface and
+the air, in which the surface is pushed slightly backwards,
+as indicated by the \DPtypo{radiometre}{radiometer}. If a beam is
+allowed to fall intermittently upon such a surface, it
+will be thrown into vibrations as if it had been struck,
+and will give out a sound, the pitch of which depends
+upon the number of interruptions per second. Such a
+device is called a radiophone.
+
+A current of electricity sent through a conductor in
+an interrupted manner makes the wire give out a sound.
+The current heats the wire, expands it slightly, and
+cools as suddenly when the current is stopped; so the
+succession of currents results in sound. In like \DPtypo{manmer}{manner},
+\DPPageSep{275.png}{261}%
+\index{Sound, range of}%
+\index{Sound, velocity of}%
+a current of electricity going through an electro-magnet
+causes a click at the instant of making and
+breaking the current. This is occasioned by the
+change in position of all the molecules. A succession
+of these may keep up a continuous hum.
+
+The electric spark itself always produces a snap of
+brief duration, for short sparks from induction coils
+and electric machines; but, when the spark is a long
+one, like a flash of lightning, the sound may be prolonged
+several seconds. Along the line of the flash
+the air is greatly heated for a very brief time, and it
+therefore rapidly expands. The quick cooling produces
+a collapse of the heated column of air, with the consequent
+noise. The duration of the thunder does not
+signify that the lightning lasts such an appreciable
+time, but that a part of it was a distance away, and that
+time was taken for the sound to come from the more
+distant place.
+
+That chemical action can give rise to sound is proved
+by the explosion of gunpowder and other explosives,
+solid and liquid. In these cases a large amount of gas
+is suddenly formed, and at a high temperature; it displaces
+the air quickly and forms a great wave. One
+may often feel the wave of compression produced by
+a cannon go by him, even at the distance of several
+hundred feet from it. These examples show that heat,
+light, electricity, magnetism, and chemism are directly
+related to mechanical motions because competent to
+produce them under appropriate conditions. If motion
+be the antecedent of any given motion, and any of
+these may be the immediate antecedent of mechanical
+\DPPageSep{276.png}{262}%
+motions such as sound, what shall be said as to the
+nature of each of these physical agencies?
+
+\Section{CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND.}
+
+As sounds may be produced by any of the physical
+agencies, it does not matter, except for convenience,
+what ones are adopted. Usually mechanical motions
+are most convenient, and for musical purposes either
+percussion, or currents of air. We speak of high
+sounds and low sounds, and we find by experiment that
+those called low are produced by fewer vibrations per
+second than those called high. If sounds are considered
+as vibratory movements, then it is evident there is
+practically an infinite range of them; for there may be
+any rate, from one a year or a thousand years all the
+way to such vibrations as atoms make, measured by
+millions of millions per second. There is no good reason
+for drawing a boundary-line at one point rather
+than at another, and saying that all vibratory movements
+beyond this rate are not to be considered as
+sound, yet it is convenient for some purposes to confine
+the range to such as can be heard.
+
+When a succession of impulses follow each other at
+such a rate as just to produce a continuous sensation of
+sound, it is found to require from twenty to thirty per
+second. It differs very much in individuals. In the
+young it requires more, as the organ of hearing acts
+more promptly than it does in the old. A less number
+than these is heard as a tremble. From this as a minimum
+one may go through a series, running from the
+lowest sound produced by a piano---about forty per second---to
+\DPPageSep{277.png}{263}%
+\index{Echo}%
+\index{Wave lengths of sound}%
+the highest one of about $4,000$ per second.
+Many insects make much higher sounds than this.
+Such differences in the rate of vibration are called differences
+in pitch; and, for musical purposes, a standard
+of pitch has been adopted, making the middle~C of
+the piano give from
+%*[Illustration: ]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{277a}
+ \Caption{33}{Diag.\ 33.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+$256$~to~$261$ vibrations.
+The pitch of a sound may be
+specified by giving its vibratory rate.
+The pitch of men's voices ranges
+from $100$~to~$150$ vibrations in conversation. Ordinary
+whistling is produced by from $1,000$ to~$3,000$ or~$4,000$.
+The squeak of bats is in the neighborhood of~$5,000$.
+Beyond these figures it is difficult to hear anything,---not
+because the vibratory motions are not produced, but
+because they have too little energy to affect the ear.
+Occasionally aurists find abnormally sensitive ears capable
+of hearing sounds with a pitch as high as fifty or
+sixty thousand, but ordinary persons have a limit in
+the neighborhood of $20,000$; so it is customary to say
+that the range of hearing of mankind is from thirty
+per second to about $25,000$: but it should always be borne
+in mind that the chief reason for not having a greater
+range is in the difficulty of giving sufficient amplitude
+to such very rapid changes. As the pitch rises the
+amplitude decreases for a given amount of vibratory
+energy. One might attribute the relatively low vibratory
+rate of the maximum which the ear can perceive
+to the lack of delicacy of the apparatus itself, which
+would be true enough in an absolute sense; but the actual
+sensitivity of the ear is really something wonderful,
+for a piece of apparatus that is altogether mechanical
+\DPPageSep{278.png}{264}%
+in its mode of operation. It has been found that the
+ear can hear such sounds as are produced by small
+whistles at the distance of several hundred feet; and, if
+the amplitude be computed,---assuming that it varies
+inversely as the square of the distance---it is found to
+be comparable with the diameter of a molecule, or less
+than the ten-millionth of an inch. One who understands
+the necessity for vibratory motions in elastic
+matter will readily conclude that between the highest
+number the ear can perceive, say $50,000$ per second,
+and the lowest rate capable of affecting the eye ($400$
+millions of millions), there is an enormous gap; and man
+has no organs for perceiving the intermediate ones.
+
+Experiments made in various ways have shown that
+the velocity of sound waves in air is about eleven hundred
+feet per second, and varies with the temperature,
+being only $1,090$~feet at the freezing point of water,
+increasing or diminishing about two feet per second for
+each degree above or below that; and this is true for
+sounds of all degrees of pitch. If it were not so,
+music could not be heard at any distance from its
+source. Suppose a tuning-fork makes one hundred
+vibrations in a second. At the end of the second the
+first wave would have got say eleven hundred feet
+away, while the last wave would have just been completed;
+or between the fork and the more distant wave
+there would be a series, one hundred in all, reaching
+eleven hundred feet. It follows that each wave would
+be eleven feet long, or the velocity of transmission
+divided by the number of vibrations. The wave length
+of sounds can be measured in several ways, and of
+\DPPageSep{279.png}{265}%
+\index{Vibrations, sympathetic}%
+\index{Vibrations, forced}%
+course the product of the wave length into the number
+of vibrations gives the velocity of sound in any conductor.
+An idea of the actual wave length for common
+sounds may be had thus: If the middle C of the piano
+makes $261$ vibrations per second, and the velocity in
+the air of the room be $1,140$ feet, $\dfrac{1140}{261} = 4.36\text{ feet}$,
+as the length of the air wave, and for a man's voice it
+will be about $\dfrac{1140}{125} = 9.1\text{ feet}$, while the highest note
+on a piano will be $\dfrac{1140}{4000} = .285\text{ foot}$, or $3.4\text{ inches}$. In
+water the velocity is four times greater than in air, in
+wood about twelve times, and in steel about sixteen
+times greater; and this will give a corresponding increase
+in the wave length. This velocity of sound in
+air is, roughly, about a mile in five seconds, or twelve
+miles a minute; and at this rate nearly a day and a
+half would be needed to go round the earth.
+
+Air waves, like water waves, are reflected when they
+come against a more solid body. Such reflections of
+air waves are called echoes. The mere fact of reflection
+does not change the length of the wave, as the
+pitch of a sound is not altered by having its direction
+changed. The law of sound reflection is the same as
+that for the reflection of energy in general; viz., the
+angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence.
+Neither does reflection change the velocity of sound
+waves.
+
+The phenomena of echoes are familiar to every one,
+for walls, houses, wood, and hills all echo sounds; and
+one may roughly determine the distance to such an
+\DPPageSep{280.png}{266}%
+\index{Musical sounds}%
+echoing surface. As one approaches such surface the
+time between producing a sound and its return is
+shortened, until, when about sixty feet from it, the two
+so blend that the echo is no longer heard with distinctness.
+The sound has then travelled $120$~feet.
+
+When sounds are produced at the ends of tubes the
+walls of the tube prevent, by reflection, the scattering
+of the waves, and the whole motion is kept in nearly
+parallel lines, and with slight loss in strength; hence the
+utility of speaking-tubes. If the tube be a short one,
+and stopped at one end, a new phenomenon appears
+for sounds having a wave length about four times the
+length of the tube. The sound is much strengthened.
+A tuning-fork making say $435$~vibrations per second will
+have a wave length of about thirty-one inches. If it be
+held while it is vibrating over a tube or vessel of any
+sort, between seven and eight inches deep, the increase
+in the strength of the sound will be very marked. The
+motion in the air is so much swifter than the prongs of
+the fork that, while one prong is beating downwards
+and thus producing a condensation in the air, the wave
+reaches the bottom of the tube; there it is reflected, and
+gets to the top just as the prong of the fork has returned
+to its normal position. As the fork continues
+upward, forming a rarefaction, the rarefaction also
+travels down the tube, and is reflected so as to get
+back when the prong has returned to its normal position;
+so for a complete vibration of the fork the air
+wave has travelled four times the length of the tube.
+It is possible in this way to make quite accurate measurements
+of either the wave length of a sound, its
+\DPPageSep{281.png}{267}%
+\index{Musical ratios}%
+\index{Noise}%
+velocity, or the number of vibrations a sounding body
+makes per second. This phenomenon is called resonance;
+and it is the chief factor in wind musical instruments,
+such as flutes, organ-pipes, and the like.
+Resonance in general means the ability of a body to be
+thrown into sound vibrations by sound waves, and there
+are two well-marked cases that need to be considered.
+When the stem of a vibrating tuning-fork is held upon
+a table the sound in the air is much louder, for the
+whole table is made to vibrate at the same rate as the
+fork. The table will resound loudly to forks of any
+pitch. Such vibrations as are different in pitch from
+that belonging to the body itself are called \emph{forced} vibrations.
+Resonance of this sort is the function of the
+sounding-boards of pianos, the bodies of violins, guitars,
+and other similar instruments.
+
+If two tuning-forks have the same pitch, and one of
+them be made to sound, the other one will presently be
+made to sound also, though it be several feet away from
+the former one. The air waves act upon it like a
+pusher upon one swinging; at each return a little more
+energy is added, until the amplitude has become great
+enough to make the sound audible. Such vibrations
+are called \emph{sympathetic}, for they are only effective upon
+bodies whose own rate of vibration is the same as that
+of the sounding body. Raise the damper to the piano
+and sing a sound of any particular note, then listen.
+The same note will be heard prolonged by the piano.
+The particular string which can give that pitch of sound
+has been thrown into similar vibrations, and continues
+to sound as it would if caused to in any other way.
+\DPPageSep{282.png}{268}%
+
+The air as a body is too large to have a vibratory
+rate of its own, and, consequently, all sounds in it are
+properly called forced vibrations; but, when it is confined
+in cavities, resonance becomes apparent, and
+sympathetic vibrations may be so strong as to be deafening.
+That is the case often in locomotive furnace-flues
+when the door is opened. One may hear it a mile
+or two. The resonance of large rooms sometimes
+renders it very difficult to understand a speaker in
+them.
+
+The prolonged sound of thunder has been often explained
+as due in some measure to echo from the clouds,
+but it is doubtful whether clouds do echo sounds. No
+one ever hears the sounds of bells, whistles, or cannon,
+or other strong sounds, coming from the clouds, as
+would be the case if they reflected sounds appreciably.
+
+When a single key of a piano is struck, there is produced
+what is called a musical sound. There is a definite
+pitch that is maintained. Strike half a dozen
+adjacent keys at once, and the effect is what is called
+a noise, though each component by itself would give a
+pleasing sound. A load of stones when tipped from
+a cart makes a great racket; yet each stone, if struck
+with a hammer, may give out a distinct musical sound.
+Nearly every body has its own musical pitch; but, if a
+number of bodies with different unrelated pitches are
+listened to at once, the effect upon the ear is a discordant
+one, and is called a noise.
+
+When, however, two or more musical sounds whose
+pitches stand in a simple ratio to each other are heard
+together, they blend so as to form a pleasing combinational
+\DPPageSep{283.png}{269}%
+\index{Musical instruments}%
+sound. Thus, if one makes twice as many vibrations
+per second as the other, the sound is a very
+smooth musical one, and one is said to be the octave of
+the other. If middle C of the piano makes $261$~vibrations,
+the octave above will make~$522$, and the octave
+below~$130.5$; and these may all be heard at once as a
+musical sound. In music an octave is divided up into
+eight parts called tones; and these are sung as \emph{do}, \emph{re},
+\emph{mi}, and so on. If a string be stretched between two
+points and the distance measured, the sound it will
+produce may be called \emph{do} of the scale. If the string
+be now shortened by a bridge so as to produce the note
+\emph{re}, and the length of the string be again measured, its
+length will be found to be eight-ninths of the length
+of the first, the note \emph{mi} will be four-fifths, \emph{fa} three-fourths,
+\emph{sol} two-thirds, \emph{la} three-fifths, \emph{si} eight-fifteenths,
+and the next \emph{do} one-half. As the number of vibrations
+a stretched string will make is inversely as its length,
+it follows that these fractions inverted will represent
+the relative number of vibrations produced by each
+member of the musical scale when compared with the
+beginning or fundamental one. The following shows
+the letters of the musical scale, with their ratios and
+vibration numbers for the middle octave of the piano.
+
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
+C & D & E & F & G & A & B & C \\[1ex]
+& $\dfrac{9}{8}$ & $\dfrac{5}{4}$ & $\dfrac{4}{3}$ & $\dfrac{3}{2}$ & $\dfrac{5}{3}$ & $\dfrac{15}{8}$ & $\dfrac{2}{1}$ \\[2ex]
+261 & 293.62 & 326.25 & 348 & 391.5 & 435 & 489.37 & 522
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The meaning of this is that $\dfrac{9}{8}×261 = 293.62$, and
+so on, so that the notes of the musical scale stand in
+\DPPageSep{284.png}{270}%
+\index{Sound, vocal}%
+\index{Voice}%
+simple ratios to each other; and, if one has the vibration
+rate of any one of them, he can compute any
+others. Of course any octave above this one will have
+simple multiples of these numbers for their vibration
+numbers.
+
+But these numbers signify more than simply this:
+they signify that, when a second one is sounding with
+C, it will make the number of vibrations represented by
+the numerator of the fraction; while C is making the
+number indicated by the denominator. Thus, G makes
+three vibrations while C makes two. The sounds are
+concordant one-third of the time, and the effect is a
+pleasing tone. On the other hand, D makes nine while
+C makes eight, and the two are in accord but one-eighth
+of the time; and the effect is displeasing, and is called
+discordant. The smaller the ratio the more musical
+and harmonious the sounds; and music is made up of a
+succession of sounds standing in such relations to each
+other, and, when different ratios are employed, it is only
+for contrast, and return is quickly made to these ratios.
+The ear will not long tolerate a departure from them.
+
+It has been stated that sympathetic vibrations would
+cause a given body to vibrate. Press down gently a
+base C on a piano, so as not to make it sound. Now
+strike the C above it, holding down the key for a second
+or two. On letting up the latter the sound of the
+latter will continue to be heard, but coming from the
+lower key, as can be learned by letting up the key, when
+it will cease to be heard. If the G above the struck C
+be now struck with the same low C held down, the
+sound of the G will be heard from the base string, and
+\DPPageSep{285.png}{271}%
+so one may go up, finding eight or ten strings, each one
+of which will make the low C string vibrate, giving out
+the sound of the higher string. It is found that each
+one of the strings able to do this has a vibration number
+which is a simple multiple of the lowest one. The first
+one is the octave, making twice the number; the second
+one is the fifth of that octave, making three times the
+number; and so on, to the upper limit of the piano.
+
+This means that a piano string is capable of vibrating
+in a number of rates,---two, three, four, and so on, times
+its own lowest rate, which is always called its pitch.
+It is also found that this process is reversible; that is,
+if each one of these keys in turn be held down and the
+lowest one struck, they will each be set vibrating; and
+this shows that the struck string vibrates itself in the
+several different pitches represented by the multiples
+of its fundamental rate. The sound of a piano string is
+therefore a compound sound. In such a compound
+sound the lowest one is called the fundamental, and the
+others the over-tones, or harmonics. Some of these
+harmonic sounds are likely to be stronger than others;
+and some may even be so much more energetic than
+the fundamental as to nearly drown the latter, so as to
+make the pitch of the string to appear an octave or
+more higher than it really is. The number and relative
+strength of the harmonics in a compound sound make
+the difference in the quality of sounds. In all such
+instruments as pianos, violins, guitars, and the like
+string instruments, the number and strength of the
+over-tones depend in a large measure upon how and
+where the strings are struck and made to sound. A
+\DPPageSep{286.png}{272}%
+\index{Ear}%
+piano string plucked near its middle point gives a different
+sound from what it will give if plucked near one
+end, and different in each case if plucked by the fingernail
+and by the finger. So the quality of sound can be
+much modified by mechanically varying these factors.
+
+In other musical instruments the sounds are also
+compound in a similar way, differing in the number and
+strength of the higher harmonics. Some have the
+even harmonics, as the second, fourth, sixth, and so on,
+stronger; some have the odd ones---first, third, fifth,
+etc.---stronger; some have few, and some many. A
+flute has but one or two, a violin has twenty; and thus
+the character of the sounds of musical instruments is
+explained.
+
+As for the voice, the sound is produced by the vibrations
+of what are called the vocal chords, which are
+fixed at the junction of the trachea and æsophagus, and
+through which all the air to and from the lungs has to
+go. These chords are modified in tension by muscles
+at will, and so change the pitch of the vibrations. The
+cavities of the throat, the mouth, and nose act as resonators
+for these sounds and seem to strengthen some
+of the constituents, thus giving prominence to certain
+ones to the exclusion of others. That the mouth acts
+this way may be observed by pursing the lips as if to
+produce the various sounds of ah, oo, o, snapping one
+cheek with the finger. These sounds will result;
+while, with a little trial, one may thus snap a tune
+which may be heard through a room, merely altering
+the size of the mouth cavity. The cavity of the nose
+is as important as that of the mouth. When this cavity
+\DPPageSep{287.png}{273}%
+\index{Corti's fibres}%
+\index{Fibres of Corti}%
+is small and narrow, there is produced what is called
+a nasal sound. When this is prominent, and is not the
+result of a cold, as is sometimes the case, the trouble
+is a physiological one, due to the bad shape of the
+resonating cavities rather than to careless habits, as is
+often assumed by some teachers of expression. Some
+different pitch of the voice in ordinary speaking might
+be adopted, and thus in some measure prevent the disagreeableness
+of the nasal sounds, but no amount of
+painstaking can altogether prevent it. That structure
+and its acoustic effects are an inheritance in some parts
+of the world, as are crooked noses, thick lips, black
+eyes, and broad heads in other and different parts of
+the world, and is no more to be legislated away than
+are these other physiological peculiarities. Neither is
+it a proper subject of ridicule, more than lameness or
+defective vision.
+
+If the bell of a locomotive be rung while it is swiftly
+approaching one, the pitch of the sound rises until the
+engine has reached the observer. As it retreats the
+pitch lowers, and the difference in pitch becomes
+greater as the velocity of the engine is greater. The
+explanation of the phenomenon is, that one judges of
+the pitch of a sound by the number of vibrations that
+reach the ear per second. Suppose an observer be
+distant eleven hundred feet from a source of sound of
+one hundred vibrations per second. If both observer
+and source remained in place, one hundred vibrations
+per second would reach the ear of the observer, and
+there would be one hundred more on the way to his
+ear. If the observer should continue to go that whole
+\DPPageSep{288.png}{274}%
+distance of eleven hundred feet to the source of the
+sound in one second, he would not only receive all he
+would by standing still, but in addition all that were
+on the way to him,---two hundred vibrations in all,---or
+just twice the number that would reach him if he
+remained in place. Now, twice a given number of
+vibrations represents a difference in pitch of an octave.
+The sound he would hear would be an octave higher
+than the sounding body was actually making. Any
+less velocity than that supposed would make a corresponding
+less difference in pitch, but such velocities as
+railway trains have may make a difference in the pitch
+of more than a musical tone. Of course, if the sounding
+body and listener be separating, a less number of
+vibrations will reach his ear, and the pitch will be correspondingly
+lowered. One may roughly determine
+the velocity of a train of cars by noting the change in
+pitch of bell or whistle. Thus, if the difference be,
+say a musical semitone,---one-sixteenth,---then the
+speed of the train is one-sixteenth the velocity of sound
+in air, one-sixteenth of $1,125$~feet, which gives seventy\DPtypo{-}{ }feet
+per second, or forty-seven miles an hour.
+
+The ear is a complicated structure of tubes, muscles,
+cartilages, bones, fibres, and nerves. The external
+part, or conch, is of but little service in hearing in man,
+for it cannot be directed, as can the ears of horses and
+cattle. If it stands out from the head so as to have
+some use as a collector, it is supposed to be in abnormal
+position; but it is not much needed in any case.
+The orifice of the ear is known as the tympanum, a
+tube a little over an inch in depth and about a quarter
+\DPPageSep{289.png}{275}%
+\index{Life}%
+of an inch in diameter. At the inner end it is covered
+with a thin membrane called the drum of the ear. On
+the inner side of this membrane, there is attached to
+the middle of it a bone fixed to a kind of hinge, so that
+any movement of the drum of the ear, in or out, makes
+this bone to move in a similar way. Then follows a
+network of bones and cartilages, and a set of fibres
+known as Corti's, of different lengths, and whose function
+has been supposed to be for sympathetic vibrations.
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{3.5in}{289a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{34}{Diag.\ 34.---The Ear.}
+\end{figure}
+There are in the neighborhood of $4,000$ of these
+fibres, each one adapted to vibrate at a different pitch.
+Then follow the nerve terminals and the acoustic
+nerve itself, which goes to the base of the brain, where
+its function as an acoustic instrument ends with the
+delivery of its peculiar motions, interpreted by consciousness
+as sound.
+
+It is easily seen that the whole structure is one
+adapted to receive vibratory motions from the air,
+within prescribed limits, and transmit them inwards
+\DPPageSep{290.png}{276}%
+\index{Life, definitions of}%
+where they can be interpreted. The tube itself possesses
+resonating properties like any other tube. The
+membrane is shaken to and fro by sound vibrations,
+and this movement is handed on to each distinct part
+until the nerve itself is shaken. From beginning to
+end, it is only the transfer of a particular kind of
+motion,---what is called mechanical,---perhaps transforming
+it from longitudinal to transverse vibrations.
+That it is so extremely sensitive as to be affected appreciably
+by motions so slight as the ten-millionth of an
+inch is a marvel, and shows that mechanical motions of
+translation, though on a scale of molecular magnitudes,
+is able, through the proper avenue, to affect the mind
+and develop consciousness, which experience enables
+the individual to interpret by direct inference.
+
+Let one reflect upon the facts furnished in great
+abundance by physical science,---that all the data which
+comes to the mind through consciousness, and which
+furnishes what is called experience, is simply motion
+of some sort. Touch, producing pressure upon the
+surface of the body, finds a suitable nerve to transmit
+to the base of the brain that kind of a disturbance;
+sight, another kind of disturbance to the optic nerve,
+transmitted to the same place; hearing, still another
+kind of motion given to another kind of nerve running
+to the same headquarters. So, by means of motions
+of various sorts man determines his place in the
+universe, and learns how he may adjust himself to it.
+%\DPPageSep{291.png}{277}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XI}{Life}{277}
+
+\First{Any} scheme of physics which fails to present that
+great body of physical phenomena exhibited by living
+things, both vegetable and animal, must be incomplete.
+Many of these phenomena have seemed to be so remote
+from ordinary mechanical operations that, in the
+absence of definite knowledge concerning them, their
+origin, factors, and relations to subsequent phenomena,
+it is not to be wondered at that they were long thought to
+be due to some peculiar force residing in a living thing,
+\index{Force, vital}%
+\index{Vital force}%
+\Pagelabel{277}% [** PP: Note to p. 277 clearly points here]
+\Pagelabel{279}%
+which was not to be attributed to the general endowments
+of matter, but only to be found in certain organized
+forms of matter, which organization it had itself
+built up as a \emph{habitat}. It was conceived to exist apart
+from any material organization as a kind of entity.
+The difference between a living and a dead animal was
+thought to be simply one of the presence or absence
+of that entity called life. It was thought to be able to
+effect changes in matter which the ordinary physical
+and chemical forces could not possibly do; and many
+of the chemical products of living things were supposed
+to be formed only through its agency; and still
+more than that: it was held to be capable of ``suspending
+the action of chemical laws.'' That the stomach
+\DPPageSep{292.png}{278}%
+\index{Cell structure}%
+\index{Protoplasm}%
+itself was not digested by the gastric juice it secreted
+was held to be proof of its control over chemical
+operations.
+
+There have been many attempts to define life, but
+the efforts have not been very successful. Thus Kant
+defines it as ``an internal principle of action;'' Treviranus,
+``the constant uniformity of phenomena under
+diversity of external influences.'' Bichat, ``Life is the
+sum of the functions by which death is resisted.''
+Duges calls life ``the special activity of organized
+beings.'' De~Blainville's and Compte's definition runs
+thus: ``Life is the twofold internal movement of composition
+and decomposition, at once general and continuous;''
+and Spencer's is ``the continuous adjustment
+of internal relations to external relations.'' It will be
+observed that in all of these what is described is a
+series of processes, or a body of functions belonging to
+certain structures, rather than an entity,---a description
+of what life does rather than what it is.
+
+Analogous difficulties were met in the attempts to
+define other of the so-called physical forces. Thus
+light was supposed to be a created something. The
+corpuscular theory of it represented it as consisting
+of particles of some sort that ordinary matter could
+absorb and eject, and which, therefore, had an existence
+independent of matter. The establishment of its
+being but wave motion in the ether completely destroyed
+the notion of its having an objective, independent
+existence.
+
+Heat, too, was supposed to be a kind of imponderable
+matter, and certain phenomena in ordinary matter
+\DPPageSep{293.png}{279}%
+\index{Molecular stability}%
+depended upon its presence or absence; it, therefore,
+was supposed to be an entity, and to have an independent
+existence. Experiment showed it to be but a
+particular kind of motion, so the idea that there was
+any such thing as heat was abandoned.
+
+Electricity and magnetism were supposed to be
+fluids; and some of the early terminology still survives
+in popular speech to-day, as when one reads that the
+electric fluid struck a tree or entered a house. Nevertheless,
+nobody now believes that either of them is
+a fluid, or has an existence independent of matter.
+
+The regular movements of the planets were thought
+to require intelligent directive power to keep them in
+their orbits; but now the gravitative property of matter
+itself is held to be quite sufficient to account for all
+the observed facts, and the extra material directive
+force is held to be an entirely unnecessary assumption.
+
+The discovery of the conservation of energy, covering
+every field that has been investigated, led to the
+growing conviction that there are no special forces of
+any kind needed to explain any phenomena. What
+seemed probable forty years ago, to those who were
+conversant with the facts,---that vital force as an entity
+has no existence, and that all physiological phenomena
+whatever can be accounted for without going beyond
+the bounds of physical and chemical science,---has
+to-day become the general conclusion of all students of
+vital phenomena; and vital force as an entity has no
+advocates in the present generation of biologists.\footnote
+ {See Appendix, \Pageref{p.}{400}.}
+The
+term has completely disappeared from the science, and
+is only to be found in historical works; and every
+\DPPageSep{294.png}{280}%
+phenomenon which was once supposed to be due to it
+is now shown to be due to the physical properties of a
+particularly complex chemical substance known as protoplasm,
+which is the substance out of which all living
+things, animals and plants, are formed. This protoplasm
+is entirely structureless, homogeneous, and as
+undifferentiated as to parts as is a solution of starch,
+or the albumen of an egg. Minute portions of this
+elementary life-stuff possess all the distinctive fundamental
+properties that are to be seen in the largest
+and most complicated living structures. It has the
+power of \emph{assimilation},---that is, of organizing dead food
+into matter like itself,---and, consequently, what is
+called growth. It possesses the ability to move---that
+is, of visible, mechanical motion, which is technically
+called \emph{contractility}; and it possesses \emph{sensitivity}---that
+is, ability to respond to external conditions.
+
+It was formerly thought that the cell was the
+physiological unit, a cell having walls differently constituted
+from the substance enclosed, also a nucleus;
+but as the microscope was improved, and anatomical
+research continued, it became evident that the cell,
+with its more or less complicated structure, was itself
+built up by the structureless protoplasm. As before
+stated, it is a highly complex substance, chemically
+considered, made up of many atoms of carbon, hydrogen,
+oxygen, and nitrogen, with a small number of
+atoms of sulphur and phosphorus,---more than a thousand
+of them in one molecule; and there appears to be
+a great number of varieties of it. A small pellicle of
+this substance, like a minute bit of jelly, without any
+\DPPageSep{295.png}{281}%
+\index{Growth of crystals}%
+\index{Growth of lobster}%
+\index{Matter, living}%
+parts or organs, possesses its various attributes in equal
+degree in every part. Any particular portion can lay
+hold upon assimilable material, or digest it, or be used
+as a means of locomotion; so that what are called
+tissues of animals and plants are only the fundamental
+properties of the protoplasm out of which they have
+been built---thrown into prominence by a kind of division
+of labor. The protoplasm organizes itself into
+cells and tissues in the same sense as atoms organize
+themselves into molecules, and molecules into crystals
+of various sorts, having different properties, that depend
+upon the kind of atoms, their number and
+arrangement in the molecule.
+
+The greater the number of atoms in a molecule the
+less stability does it have, and especially is this the case
+with molecules containing nitrogen. Many of its compounds
+are so unstable as to be liable to explosive
+disruption. This fact makes it easy to understand how
+there exists, in a mass of such molecules no larger than
+the minute ones seen in the microscope, conditions for
+internal motions in the nature of explosions.
+
+Let it be granted that atoms are in the neighborhood
+of the fifty-millionth of an inch in diameter; then,
+if a thousand of them are organized into a molecule, its
+diameter would be about the five-millionth of an inch.
+A speck of protoplasm, one ten-thousandth of an inch
+in diameter, would require not less than five hundred
+such molecules in a row to span it; and there would be
+no less than one hundred and twenty-five millions of
+such molecules in the small mass. Some of these molecules
+would be less stable than others on account of
+\DPPageSep{296.png}{282}%
+\index{Food}%
+the internal motions that all the time are present.
+Physical disturbances, external to such a mass, such as
+temperature, ether waves of light, and chemical re-actions
+of any sort, and so on, can induce and add to the
+disruption and other changes going on, and visible motions
+might be expected to follow.
+
+That such external agencies can bring about visible
+motions of microscopic particles has long been known.
+A few small bits of camphor dropped upon the surface
+of clean water in a saucer will begin to move about in
+a remarkable way. They will spin round, and travel
+from place to place, and dodge each other in a manner
+strongly like living things. A little gamboge, which is
+a reddish-yellow gum used as a pigment, if rubbed up
+in water and looked at through a microscope, will be
+seen to have its particles in constant motion like animalcules.
+This is known as the Brownian movement,
+and is caused by temperature changes between the
+particles and the water. Such phenomena are rather
+extreme cases of the re-action of external molecular conditions
+upon a small mass of matter, resulting in mechanical
+motions. In protoplasm there is added to
+these same external ones others of the nature of molecular
+explosions within the mass, and together they
+give rise to a number of effects, in which the transformed
+energy shows itself in redistributing the molecules,
+absorbing additional material, and movements of
+other sorts.
+
+Biological researches within the past few years have
+added vastly to our knowledge of protoplasm and its
+properties; and there is no longer any question that its
+\DPPageSep{297.png}{unnumbered}%
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{297a}
+ \label{fig:frost}
+ \end{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
+\scriptsize%
+The above picture is copied from a photograph. It represents the plume-like
+forms assumed by water when crystallized in a basin. The similarity it presents
+to vegetable forms is very striking. One may often see on frosty window-panes
+fantastic imitations of organic things which forcibly suggest vitality. They are
+too common to be considered coincidences.
+\end{minipage}
+\end{figure}
+\DPPageSep{298.png}{283}%
+\index{Muscles}%
+qualities are the expression of the various movements,
+chemical and physical, and belong to it simply as a
+chemical substance. Chemists have synthetically
+formed out of the various elements a vast number of
+substances that were not long ago believed to be formed
+only by living things; and there is but little reason to
+doubt that, when they shall be able to form the substance
+protoplasm, it will possess all the properties it is now
+known to have, including what is called its life; and one
+ought not to be surprised at its announcement any day.
+
+Some of the phenomena exhibited by bodies called
+inorganic, such as minerals of many kinds, possess
+properties that are very like those supposed to belong
+solely to living things. A spider or a lobster will have
+a new leg or claw grow to replace one lost in any way.
+In like manner a crystal will replace a corner or side or
+any defacement so as to complete its symmetry before
+it will begin to grow elsewhere, and this in cases where
+the crystal has been defaced or incomplete for millions
+of years, as is found to be the case sometimes in geological
+specimens. Such phenomena have led some of
+the most thoughtful and best informed naturalists to
+query whether the evidence we have does not lend
+much support to the theory that \emph{matter itself is alive},
+and that the difference we observe in things is simply
+one of degree rather than of kind. See \hyperref[fig:frost]{opposite page}.
+
+In the brief space of this chapter, only an outline of
+the relations between vital and physical phenomena can
+be given, and of these, only a few of the more prominent
+ones. It will suffice to show that such phenomena
+as assimilation and growth, movement and irritability,
+\DPPageSep{299.png}{284}%
+or sensitivity, have antecedents of physical energy in
+the same sense as the movements of an electric motor
+have physical antecedents in electric currents, dynamos,
+steam-engine, and furnace.
+
+The food of an animal consists almost altogether in
+highly complex molecular compounds. It may be said to
+be matter stored with energy. A pound of bread may
+have the mechanical equivalent of twelve thousand heat
+units, and if burnt in an engine would be better for
+heating purposes than a pound of coal. When this has
+been digested, and has done its work in the body, the
+excreted products are of course equal in weight to the
+original pound, for no kind of a physical or chemical
+process affects the quantity of matter in any degree;
+but the products themselves represent much less complex
+compounds, and the energy has been distributed
+through the body, carrying on its various operations.
+There is, first, that of ordinary movement, which can be
+measured in foot-pounds, as work of any kind may be.
+The blood in the arteries and veins has to depend upon
+a kind of hydraulic apparatus to keep it in motion.
+The temperature of the body demands a supply of heat
+measurable in heat units to maintain it, while the
+repair and waste going on through the whole body of
+all animals implies a distribution of the material necessary
+for the maintenance of the integrity of the tissues,
+as well as a separation and removal of the used-up material;
+that is, the material that has lost all its available
+energy. The energy for doing all this of course comes
+from the food, so the question is not as to its source
+and quantity, but it is, How is this transformation of
+\DPPageSep{300.png}{288}%
+\index{Nerves, their functions}%
+energy in the body effected? Is it direct, or is it indirect?
+This is the same as asking as to the mechanism
+in the body, by means of which energy supplied is transformed
+to meet the various wants of the body.
+
+Roughly, there are five different kinds of motion to
+trace the antecedents of in the body of any of the
+higher animals. First, there is the common mechanical
+motions of the bony framework, which transport the
+body from one place to another, or change the position
+of a part with respect to the rest, as when one moves
+an arm. Second, there is the motion of a muscle,
+wholly different in character from the first, for the
+shape of the muscle changes by contracting in length
+and increasing in diameter. The muscles are so attached
+to the bones that the contractions of the one
+cause the others to change their positions. The muscular
+contractions of the heart, arteries, and veins keep
+the blood circulating; and the same is true for the processes
+of digestion, breathing, etc.
+
+Third, there is the motion constituting the temperature
+of the body, which, as has been explained, is altogether
+atomic and molecular in its nature, and is,
+therefore, in strong contrast with the other two.
+
+Fourth, there is a kind of motion that is going on
+throughout the body of the nature of transpiration, in
+which solids, liquids, and gases are passing through the
+various membranes without rupturing them. In the
+lungs there is an exchange of gases, oxygen going one
+way and carbonic acid gas going the other. In all the
+mucous-membrane-lined cavities there is more or less
+liquid oozing through the walls continuously, and there
+\DPPageSep{301.png}{286}%
+is no tissue so dense but protoplasmic masses do not
+move into or out of apparently with ease. They go
+through the walls of veins and arteries as if the latter
+were porous bodies, though no visible pores have ever
+been discovered in them.
+
+Fifth, there is the motion in the nerves, in the nature
+of a longitudinal wave, and the velocity of which is in
+the neighborhood of one hundred feet in a second,
+which, though it is slow compared with sound waves or
+light waves, is fast when compared with the other
+motions of the body. He is a swift runner who can
+run at the rate of thirty feet a second for any distance.
+
+The contraction of a muscle is to be measured in
+fractions of an inch per second. The motion of heat,
+measured as a rate of conduction, is exceedingly small
+in the animal body,---probably not the hundredth of an
+inch per second. The transpiration, or osmotic action,
+is also a relatively slow movement, so that a velocity of
+one hundred feet per second, which is upwards of a mile
+a minute, is really rapid.
+
+How and why the bone moves we know: it is because
+the muscle that is attached to it contracts; but how is
+energy spent to make a muscle contract? As a matter
+of fact, when a muscle contracts it evolves a considerable
+quantity of carbonic acid gas and water; it also
+becomes acid, all of which imply chemical actions, for
+these are chemical products. Carbonic acid gas and
+water are the chief products of the combustion of such
+material as foods, for they are made of what are called
+hydro-carbons (combinations of carbon, hydrogen, and
+oxygen chiefly); and when these elements re-combine,
+\DPPageSep{302.png}{287}%
+\index{Nerves, their functions}%
+forming water and carbonic acid, there is always a relatively
+large but definite amount of energy given out
+in the form of heat, and this effect is independent of
+time or place; that is, the same amount is developed
+whether the process goes on fast or slow, or whether it
+takes place in a furnace, in the body, or by slow decomposition
+called rotting. When it goes on faster than
+the heat can be conducted or radiated away, the temperature
+rises and we say the body is hot. When the heat
+generated is at once employed to do work, as in a steam-engine,
+the temperature of it is reduced proportional to
+the work done. When this takes place in a contracting
+muscle better results follow, for conduction and
+radiation within a muscle can take place at only a slow
+rate; so the temperature rises, and this explains the
+sensation of warmth resulting from muscular exercise.
+The increase in perspiration is also partly due to the
+same re-action of decomposition, as water is one of the
+products. When the muscle in contracting does additional
+work, as in raising a weight, a corresponding
+amount of decomposition takes place, and the heat is
+but transient, as it is at once transformed into the
+muscular motion, which is as much mechanical in its
+nature as is the movement in a steam-engine.
+
+The muscle is quite like a spiral spring, which may
+contract upon itself and do work by contracting.
+
+It is not the substance of the muscle itself that undergoes
+the change of disintegration, evolving water, carbonic
+acid, and other products; but there is evidence
+that the muscle secretes a particular substance called
+\emph{inogen}, the rapid decomposition of which causes the
+\DPPageSep{303.png}{288}%
+\index{Corn, life of}%
+\index{Egg}%
+contraction. As this substance can only be replaced at
+a definite rate and in a definite amount, it is clear that
+the work of a given muscle is limited by the physiological
+processes that precede it. The rate of work of a
+muscle is then determined by the rate at which inogen
+can be secreted by the muscle, and work done beyond
+that rate results in muscular exhaustion, which in its
+early stages is called weariness, and requires repose for
+fresh accumulation. Excessive draught upon the
+muscles reduces their ability to secret inogen, and their
+degeneration follows.
+
+Muscular contraction is satisfactorily accounted for
+without assuming any vital force. It has a purely
+physical origin, the structure itself acting as a kind of
+mechanism for transforming the chemical energy supplied
+in food into the mechanical forms of energy
+represented by the various movements of the body,
+external and internal, which have already been mentioned.
+
+That physical and chemical agencies bring about new
+movements is of course well understood. Especially
+clear is this for such nerve actions as accompany the
+special sensations of sound, sight, touch, and the rest.
+That the disturbance is properly described as a movement
+is apparent when it is found that it has a rate of
+progression, as before stated, of from one hundred to
+three feet per second. Whether such movement be
+similar to a sound wave in a rod or tube, or to an electric
+disturbance, makes no difference so far as the transformation
+and transference of energy are concerned.
+For sound there is the antecedent of vibratory motions
+\DPPageSep{304.png}{289}%
+\index{Growth}%
+in the air; for light, waves in the ether; for touch,
+mechanical pressure; for taste, chemical solution; and
+for smell, gaseous substances with definite constitutions
+and rates of vibration. These represent the ordinary
+stimulants to action of such nerves, and so are commonly
+understood to be the source of disturbance; but
+every one of these so-called special nerves may be
+excited to action by other agencies than the common
+or normal ones, and the effect is the same. Thus, the
+optic nerve may be stimulated by pressure, by cutting,
+pricking, thumping, and electricity, and the effect is the
+sensation of light; and, in the absence of other sources
+of information as to the origin of the sensation, no one
+could tell which of these was the originating one.
+Every one of them, however, represents some form of
+energy spent upon the nerve. What is important to
+note about it is this,---the nerve transmits an impulse
+it receives, quite indifferent as to its source, and is
+interpreted as a definite sensation, quite independent
+of its origin. The latter is only an inference, and is,
+therefore, liable to be \DPtypo{eroneous}{erroneous}.
+
+But there are several other kinds of nerves, each
+with some different function from the rest. Thus there
+are nerves running to muscles, causing them to contract,
+called motor, or efferent, nerves; secretory nerves,
+to glands that cause secretions; vascular nerves, that
+cause contraction or dilatation of the walls of blood-vessels;\DPnote{** Only instance,}
+inhibitory nerves, that affect other nerves so
+as to moderate or entirely stop their action; reflex, or
+afferent, nerves, which convey disturbances to the brain
+or other nerve centres, but which cause no sensation;
+\DPPageSep{305.png}{290}%
+and still others known to exist, but the special functions
+of which are unknown.
+
+To describe the action of any nerve is to describe
+the transmission of energy in greater or less amount,
+and transmission in all cases requires time. This does
+not mean that the energy which does the special work
+of moving muscles or the chemical transformations of
+foods into tissues is transmitted by the nerves, but
+that the transformations of energy already present in
+each place where the work is to be done are controlled
+by nervous energy in the same way as a local galvanic
+circuit is controlled by a relay, or the explosion in a
+mine is determined by an electric spark. The energy
+available for all the purposes of an animal, including
+man, exists in the material of the body. The activity
+of protoplasm in the various cells transforms the various
+food stuffs into the proper substances needed. The
+energy is already present; it is only differently distributed
+by protoplasm; and nervous action determines
+what changes, if any, shall go on at a given place.
+
+Temperature determines whether any of the physiological
+process shall go on or not. Plants and animals
+of a low order, such as snakes, frogs, and fishes, may be
+frozen without injury. Some of the minuter forms of
+life can withstand arctic winters, for there is an abundance
+of insect life in those regions. On the other
+hand, a temperature of~$140°$ is destructive to the life of
+everything except the seeds and spores of a few microscopic
+beings. Some of these have been known to
+survive a temperature of~$200°$, continued for an hour
+or more; but nothing has been found that can withstand
+\DPPageSep{306.png}{291}%
+\index{Matter, living}%
+\index{Toepler-Holtz electrical machine}%
+the boiling temperature of~$212°$. The retarding
+influence of cold upon vital processes can be understood
+by considering that special chemical compounds require
+special temperatures to form; and, if energy has to be
+supplied to maintain the proper temperature, so much
+the less will be at disposal for other processes. If life
+processes were other than physical, it might be expected
+that they would not be quite so rigidly conditioned by
+physical surroundings.
+
+There is a distinction between a living plant or animal
+and the seed or spore or egg out of which they
+grow. Both are commonly spoken of as living things,
+but the processes that constitute life in the one are not
+present in the other in any degree; thus, for example,
+growing corn and the grain of corn from which the
+plant started. The grain of corn may be kept in a
+suitable dry place for several years without any apparent
+change, unless it be some loss in weight due to
+evaporation from it. How long it may exist thus and
+still be able to grow if planted is not known. Grains
+of wheat found with Egyptian mummies buried three
+thousand years ago have been said to grow, but there
+is much doubt about it, and botanists do not credit
+the story. A few years' keeping in moister climates
+destroys their ability to grow, and farmers always
+choose seed corn from last year's growth, which is an
+indication that there is a process of slow deterioration
+going on that ends after no long time in utter inability
+to grow under any conditions. This ability to remain
+for several years in a nearly stable condition is a property
+of the seed that does not belong to the plant; for,
+\DPPageSep{307.png}{292}%
+when growth has once really begun, it must keep on
+growing or die: arrest is impossible, which seems to
+show that life is a process rather than a condition, and
+the grain of corn is simply a combination of materials
+where, under suitable conditions, life may begin.
+
+The constitution of corn is well known; that is, the
+elements out of which it is built up, and the proportionate
+parts of each. Like other kinds of food, it has
+carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, for the chief constituents,
+and in addition a little sulphur, phosphorus,
+iron, potassium, and a trace of some others. These,
+when organized as they are in a grain of corn, form a
+very complex body indeed. There are not only molecular
+groups of many sorts, but these are segregated
+into families, so that bodies of one constitution are all
+in one locality, and bodies of other constitutions in
+other separate localities, but definitely arranged so as
+to be available when the life process begins. Once
+formed, it appears to be as inert as a crystal of any
+sort, and no change happens to it until such physical
+conditions as heat and moisture are provided. These
+it absorbs and transforms; a sprout appears, then a
+root, each with different functions, one for absorbing
+ether waves, the other for absorbing water. The
+energy of ether waves is utilized in digesting carbonic
+acid and building up the structure, and the
+growth is simply the addition of materials gathered
+in this way and elaborated into similar protoplasmic
+form and structure. Growth implies transformation
+of one substance into the material of another, and is
+effected by means of energy from external sources.
+\DPPageSep{308.png}{293}%
+\index{Atoms, life associated with}%
+\index{Foster, Dr.\ Michael, quoted}%
+The energy of a stalk of corn may be found by using
+it as fuel and finding its heat units per pound. It has
+about the same value as wood. The corn itself has
+somewhat higher value, which shows it to have a more
+complex molecular structure, and is correspondingly
+less stable.
+
+In like manner an egg, say that of a hen, possesses a
+degree of stability that does not belong to it after it
+has begun to grow. It may be kept with some care
+for a few months and retain its ability to develop into
+a chick; yet it ultimately wholly loses its possibility,
+which shows that slow changes of the nature of disintegration
+are going on that cannot be arrested. The
+physical condition necessary to initiate the growth of
+the egg is simply one of temperature. One hundred
+and four degrees continued for three weeks completes
+the process. When one reflects upon the nature of
+heat,---that it is but vibratory motion,---he can at once
+see that energy has been supplied to a complex mass
+of matter and it has been chemically transformed.
+There are new chemical products and new properties
+produced; and however wonderful the completed product
+may be, the factors at work to produce it have been
+absolutely physical from beginning to end. After
+growth has once begun the process must continue, at
+the peril of quick degeneration on stopping; so that an
+egg, like the grain of corn, seems to be a material
+structure where life may begin, rather than a living
+thing itself. Such a distinction has not, however,
+been made in the literature of the development of living
+things. It has, perhaps, only a philosophical importance;
+\DPPageSep{309.png}{294}%
+but, if there are any who would still hold that
+life is a something \textit{sui generis}, that may be considered
+apart from some material structure and not as a transformation
+process, it will be well for such to inquire
+what can become of such life as a grain of corn or an
+egg has when either of them is cooked, or when either
+of them is left for months or years and they rot. At
+first it is in the grain of corn or egg. If it be an entity
+of any sort it must be somewhere else after leaving
+either the one or the other. On the other supposition
+the question does not arise at all, for it is plain that
+disintegration destroys the molecular arrangement, and
+with the destruction of that the properties of such
+organizations of matter must go also; for the properties
+of a mass of matter are, by general agreement, the
+result of the arrangements of the matter. Woody fibre
+and starch are of precisely the same chemical composition,
+but the properties of the two are far from being
+identical.
+
+What, then, is the distinction between what is called
+living and dead matter? One is able to transform
+energy for its maintenance, and the other seems to be
+wholly inert; yet, if analyzed, both may be reduced to
+precisely the same amount of elements.
+
+An analogy may make the distinction plainer. A
+maker of physical instruments may make what is called
+a Toepler-Holtz electrical machine. It is composed of
+wood and glass and brass and tinsel and tin foil, and
+possibly of other materials. Each one of these is got
+at a different place from the rest, and all are assembled
+in the shop of the maker. The individual parts are
+\DPPageSep{310.png}{295}%
+\index{Fields, physical}%
+\index{Fields, thermal}%
+\index{Physical fields}%
+shaped in particular ways, and these are at last fixed in
+their appropriate places. The machine is done; but it
+has never generated an electric spark, and one could
+discover no electricity about it. Indeed, there is none,
+any more than when the material was unshapen and
+lying upon his bench. If the proper kind of energy is
+spent upon it, however, it at once becomes electrified,
+and electrical energy may now be got from it in indefinite
+quantity, dependent wholly upon the proper turning
+of the crank. If that be turned the wrong way, or
+if it be stopped, the electricity soon quite disappears.
+Now, it is the function of such a machine to transform
+mechanical energy into electrical, and it does this so
+long as energy is furnished for transformation and the
+integrity of the machine is maintained. If one weighs
+the machine before it has been worked, and also while
+it is electrified, he will find no difference. If the brass
+buttons get off or displaced, if the belt gets broken or
+the glass cracked, the machine will weigh just as much
+as it did when they were in place; but the property of
+the machine to transform energy will be destroyed, and
+it may be as useless for the purpose as a coffee-mill
+would be. One might speak of the whole machine as
+an organism,---its wood and glass and brass as its molecular
+composition, its function depending upon each
+of these being in its appropriate place, and nothing
+more. It can only exercise that function when energy
+of the proper sort is turned into it. If its molecular
+composition is deranged in any of a dozen different
+ways, no one is surprised that it no longer responds to
+the turning of the crank. If the complete and perfect
+\DPPageSep{311.png}{296}%
+machine be called living, then the one with its
+parts disarranged so it can no longer perform its functions
+might be called a dead machine.
+
+The egg may be likened to the machine. So long as
+its molecular arrangement is intact, so long it is competent
+to transform the heat supplied to it and exhibit
+new properties. When the molecular arrangement is
+interfered with, whether from within or without, its
+function as transformer ceases, and we call it dead.
+
+It may be said, and often has been, that every living
+thing has an ancestry of living things; and in human
+experience it is true. It is sometimes said that one
+cannot get out of a mass of matter what is not in it,
+which, in this case, might imply that matter itself is
+alive, as suggested a few pages back, though I have
+never heard any one so conclude. If one would apply
+this dictum, let him settle with himself before turning
+a new electrical machine whether the electricity he is
+to get from it is or is not in the machine, and how, if it
+be in the machine, he can get an infinite amount from
+it by simply turning the crank. He may reach the conclusion
+that what can be got out of a mass of matter
+depends upon its composition and structure.
+
+In conclusion, one perhaps can do no better than to
+quote the words of Dr.\ Michael Foster, Professor of
+Physiology, University of Cambridge, England, as to
+the properties of protoplasm. ``The more these molecular
+problems of physiology are studied, the stronger
+becomes the conviction that the consideration of what
+we call structure and composition must, in harmony
+with the modern teachings of physics, be approached
+\DPPageSep{312.png}{297}%
+\index{Electrical field}%
+\index{Fields, electrical}%
+under the dominant conception of modes of motion.
+The physicists have been led to consider the qualities
+of things as expressions of internal movements; even
+more imperative does it seem to us that the biologist
+should regard the qualities of protoplasm (including
+structure and composition) as in like manner the expressions
+of internal movements. He may speak of
+protoplasm as a complex substance, but he must strive
+to realize that what he means by that is a complex
+whirl, an intricate dance, of which what he calls chemical
+composition, histological structure, and gross configuration
+are, so to speak, the figures; to him the
+renewal of protoplasm is but the continuance of the
+dance, its functions and actions the transferences of
+the figures\ldots. It seems to us necessary, for a satisfactory
+study of the problems, to keep clearly before
+the mind the conception that the phenomena in question
+are the result, not of properties of kinds of matter,
+but of kinds of motion.''
+
+If such be the case, it is clear that the solution of
+every ultimate question in biology is to be found only
+in physics, for it is the province of physics to discover
+the antecedents as well as the consequents of all modes
+of motion.
+%\DPPageSep{313.png}{298}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XII}{Physical Fields}{298}
+
+\Section{I.---THE THERMAL FIELD}
+
+\First{When} a mass of matter of any kind possesses
+energy of such a kind as to be able to impart some or
+all of it to the medium about it, whether that medium
+be the air or the ether, which transmits or distributes
+it outwards with a velocity which depends solely upon
+the ability of the medium to transmit energy, and not
+upon the source of it, the energy so distributed is
+called radiant energy.
+
+The term was first applied to the energy radiated by
+a hot or luminous body, from which the heat was said
+to be radiated away, the motions of the molecules of
+the hot body being transformed into wave motions in
+the ether. The wave motion thus set up is known to
+be competent to set other masses of matter upon
+which it falls into vibratory molecular motions, similar
+to those that originated the waves. In other words,
+they are capable of heating other matter. The space
+within which such effects can be produced will evidently
+be limited only by the distance to which the
+wave motion is transmitted, and this in turn depends
+upon the special medium concerned---in this case the
+ether---and the uniformity of its distribution. As has
+\DPPageSep{314.png}{299}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+been already pointed out, the ether transmits such
+wave motions in straight lines, and to an indefinite
+distance,---so great at least as to require not less than
+five thousand years to cross the space accessible to our
+observations. As such waves of all wave lengths
+travel with equal velocities, and as all known bodies
+of matter are continually radiating waves of many
+wave lengths, it follows that in reality every molecule
+of matter sets the whole visible and invisible physical
+universe in a tremor. The magnitude of this effect is
+not now under consideration.
+
+The space external to a body within which the body
+can act in this physical way upon other bodies, so as to
+bring them into a condition similar to its own, is called
+its \emph{field}. The heat or thermal field of a mass of
+matter of any size and of any temperature must,
+therefore, be as extensive as the universe, unless the
+ether absorbs the energy to some extent and becomes
+itself heated. At present there is no evidence that
+such an effect is produced. Some astronomers have
+inferred that absorption takes place, else the whole
+surface of the sky would be bright with the multitude
+of stars that occupy it. On the other hand, if absorption
+did take place in a manner at all comparable
+with gaseous absorption, it would be selective in some
+degree, and the more distant stars would have a color
+different from those closer to us; and the colors of all
+stars would depend upon their distance from us. If
+such a condition had been observed, it would be conclusive
+evidence of absorption in the ether, but it has
+not been observed.
+\DPPageSep{315.png}{300}%
+\index{Earth, a magnet}%
+\index{Electrical waves}%
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+\index{Waves, electric}%
+
+Furthermore, the perception of light implies a definite
+though a small amount of energy; and, as the
+energy of ether waves from a given point upon a
+surface varies inversely as the square of the distance
+from the point, it follows that there must be some
+distance from it where the energy upon the retina
+must be too slight to affect it; and hence the inability
+of the eye to perceive the light could not be
+used as an argument against the existence of the waves
+altogether. At the rate of $186,000$ miles per second
+light travels $5,800000,000000$ (nearly six millions of
+millions of miles) a year, and in five thousand years,
+which is the distance of some of the more remote
+stars, $29000,000000,000000$ (twenty-nine thousand
+millions of millions) of miles. This, therefore, is the
+known length of the radius of the thermal or light
+field of a heated or luminous body; and, as such heat-producing
+waves are radiated in every direction about
+the body, the sphere having such a radius represents
+the space within which any or every atom of matter
+can affect other atoms to heat them.
+
+
+\Section{II.---THE ELECTRICAL FIELD.}
+
+The phenomenon called electrical induction, by
+which one body becomes electrified by simply being
+in proximity to another body which is electrified, is
+another illustration of both a \emph{field} and its property,
+depending altogether upon its origin. But an electric
+field differs in a marked way from a thermal field.
+
+Imagine a sphere---say a cannon-ball---to be electrified,
+and be isolated a long way from any other body.
+\DPPageSep{316.png}{301}%
+Its effect upon the ether about it would be equal in
+every direction. Practically, it would be distributed as
+the thermal field would be; and, if the strength of the
+field should be measured in any way, it would be found
+to vary inversely as the square of the distance from
+the body that produced the field. When such an electrified
+body is adjacent to other bodies, as is necessarily
+the case with every electrified body upon the
+earth, the strength of the field at a given point is
+found to depend upon the size, the nearness, and the
+quality of the adjacent body. Suppose the adjacent
+body were a similar cannon-ball, and its distance from
+the former one foot. Then the strength of the field
+would be found to be greatest between them, and to be
+very weak in the space equidistant and on the opposite
+side. One may get a mechanical idea of the condition
+of things by imagining straight lines drawn from the
+electrified body when out in space as if they were rays
+of light, evenly distributed in space. When, as in the
+second case, another ball is near to it, these rays crowd
+around the second one and apparently are absorbed by
+it; and these may now be represented by the same
+lines, starting at the same places as before, but sweeping
+in curves to the second, with only here and there
+one to escape into the unoccupied space. The nearer
+the two are together the more closely are these lines
+crowded together in the space between; and, as the
+number of these lines in a given area represent the
+strength of the electric field, it is plain the field is
+strongest where the lines are most crowded. On the
+other hand, if the second ball had been made of glass,
+\DPPageSep{317.png}{302}%
+\index{Chemical field}%
+\index{Fields, chemical}%
+the field would have been changed but little, for glass
+is a substance having but little absorptive power for
+electric rays; that is, it is not much affected by an
+electric field. When such an electrified ball is suspended
+in an ordinary large room, these lines, representing
+the field, are distributed about the room in a
+manner that depends altogether upon the kind of
+material there is in the room. The metallic objects,
+such as a stove, a steam-radiator, a gas-pipe, and the
+like, will divide the field between them, not equally,
+for the nearer ones will have the most, and other parts
+of the space in the room will have but a trace of it.
+The great distinction between the electrical and the
+thermal field will be apparent when one reflects upon
+what the latter would be for the same cannon-ball made
+hot and suspended, in the same manner, in the room.
+The rays go straight in every direction, and are not
+deflected by proximity to other bodies. The one is
+uniform in every direction about it; the other is warped
+by the presence of other bodies.
+
+An electric field, which is merely the ether in a
+condition of stress, electrifies the bodies upon which it
+acts; that is to say, it produces in them a condition
+similar to that of the body that produced the field. It
+does not heat them: it electrifies them. The process
+is ordinarily called induction. If one would follow
+mentally the mechanical conditions and changes that
+take place when this process of induction takes place,
+let him imagine the two cannon-balls suspended in
+a room a few feet apart, and one of them to be
+suddenly electrified artificially in any kind of a way,
+\DPPageSep{318.png}{303}%
+\index{Crystallization}%
+as by connecting it to a charged electrical machine for
+an instant. The re-action upon the ether will at once
+begin. The stress into which it will be thrown will be
+propagated outwards as a wave, with the velocity of
+light, and equally in every direction about it too, until
+the advancing wave reaches the second ball, when the
+absorption so reduces the stress that other parts of
+the field can move towards it, thus distorting it; for
+at the outset every part of the wave moved in a radial
+line. This must be the case unless the field acted
+intelligently instead of mechanically, and knew where
+it was to go beforehand. Of course no one would
+suppose that, but the remark is made to emphasize
+the necessity for the mechanical steps in order to have
+clear ideas of what has happened. The whole would
+happen in so small a fraction of a second that it would
+be exceedingly difficult to measure it, but the rate at
+which a thing is done does not necessarily modify the
+way of doing it.
+
+\Section{III.----THE MAGNETIC FIELD.} %
+
+The distribution of iron filings about a magnet gives
+one a very definite mechanical conception of the shape
+and properties of a magnetic field. It has before been
+remarked that the shape of the field depended upon
+the form of the magnet, and when this was altered the
+field changed its form. That it too represents a condition
+of the ether seems unquestionable. That it is produced
+by the arrangement of the molecules of the magnet
+is also certain; but that presumes that the atoms
+themselves are magnets, each having its own field.
+\DPPageSep{319.png}{304}%
+\index{Mechanical field}%
+When these atoms are either in disorder or so arranged
+as to mutually cancel each other's field, there is no field
+observable. When they are made to all face one way,
+their individual fields will conspire to produce a resultant
+field, which will be strong in proportion to the
+number of such individual fields that make it up. The
+nature of this magnetic field is probably a kind of
+whirl or spiral movement in the ether between the
+two poles of the magnet; but, as two similar adjacent
+whirls or lines are mutually repulsive, they spread out
+into space indefinitely, and are almost always curved.
+The earth as a great magnet has such a field, the lines
+reaching from the north polar regions upwards and
+southwards, re-entering the earth by similar downward
+sweeps in the south polar regions. How far away
+from the earth some of them may extend no one
+knows, but there seems to be no reason why they
+should not extend as far as any ray of light. There is
+good reason for thinking that the other members of the
+solar system are magnets, especially as iron and nickel
+are so abundant in the sun and in the meteorites that
+reach us from space. If that be the case, they are all
+moving in each other's magnetic fields. As the movement
+of a conductor in a magnetic field produces an
+electric current in the conductor, and as what are known
+as earth currents, apparently due to some extra terrestrial
+source, are well known, their origin is accounted
+for. But, when there is iron in a magnetic field, the latter
+acts upon it so as to compel it to produce a field of
+its own. In other words, it makes a magnet of the iron.
+The process is called magnetic induction. Like the
+\DPPageSep{320.png}{305}%
+other cases, it is a two-step process. There is, first, the
+magnet with its molecular arrangement; second, the
+action of the magnet upon the surrounding ether; and,
+third, the re-action of the ether upon the second body,
+making it a magnet. The heat field heats a body, the
+electric field electrifies a body, the magnet field magnetizes
+a body; and each of these fields may exist separately
+or simultaneously, and each do its own characteristic
+work, quite independent of either of the
+others: so the same body may become magnetized, electrified,
+and heated at the same time by the same medium,
+acted upon by three different sources. The magnetic
+field is more selective in its action than either of
+the other two. A heat field will heat any kind of matter
+in it if it be solid or liquid; an electric field will
+electrify all bodies to some degree, but solid conducting
+bodies to the highest degree; while the magnetic field
+magnetizes only iron, nickel, and cobalt appreciably,
+and the two latter but to a very small extent. The
+point of chief importance here is the function of the
+field itself to produce, in a certain kind of elementary
+solid matter, a molecular disposition and arrangement
+similar to that of the body which produced the field.
+
+\Section{IV.--THE CHEMICAL FIELD.} %
+
+The phenomena attendant upon the combination of
+atoms into molecules, and molecules in cohering together
+to form larger masses, make it certain that each
+atom has a peculiar field, which, for a name, may be
+called its chemical field, within which it acts upon the
+\DPPageSep{321.png}{306}%
+\index{Attraction, gravitative}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+ether about it, and which extends to a distance from it
+many times the diameter of any atom or molecule.
+
+Chemists have concluded that there is really no distinction
+between what has been called chemical attraction
+and cohesive attraction; such, for instance, as enables
+a drop of water to adhere to a surface, or glue to
+hold wood surfaces together.
+
+Crystals are built up of similar cohering molecules
+arranged in a definite order. And these molecules exist
+as independent bodies while in the solution before
+being crystallized, and consequently each molecule must
+have some degree of attraction for others; and this is
+about the same as saying that there is an ether stress
+about each one that depends upon its temperature, for
+crystallization cannot take place in a solution above a
+definite temperature. But one of the best evidences of
+a chemical field of the sort is found in the fact that a
+solution of a given crystallizable salt has its process
+easily initiated by putting in a small crystal of the same
+kind of a substance. Moreover, the mere presence of
+certain kinds of molecules among others is sufficient to
+bring about chemical changes which otherwise would
+not occur; while the catalytic body, as it is called, is not
+changed. This is the case with starch, which is converted
+into sugar by the mere presence of sulphuric
+acid, which undergoes no change. This is apparently
+inexplicable, unless it is admitted that molecules of all
+sorts have fields which, in one degree or another, control
+chemical combinations. This has been treated of
+at some length in the chapter on chemism. Its signification
+here is to point out again that the field of similar
+\DPPageSep{322.png}{307}%
+\index{Growth}%
+molecules is of such a sort as to compel within it an arrangement
+of atoms into similar molecules, and molecules
+into similar positions, as exhibited by crystals of
+any sort. It is, therefore, another example of the property
+of a physical field to bring about in a mass of matter
+within it the same kind of physical phenomena as
+that which induced the field.
+
+\Section{V.--THE MECHANICAL FIELD.} %
+
+A sounding body sets up air waves that travel outwards
+radially from it in every direction to an indefinite
+distance. Such periodic waves are capable of making
+other bodies vibrate at the same rate as the original
+body. When the second body has the same specific
+rate, absorption takes place, the amplitude of vibration
+increases, and the case is known as one of sympathetic
+vibration. When the specific rate is different from
+that of the recurring waves, there is more or less interference,
+and this case is called forced vibration. In all
+cases, however, the second body is made to vibrate by
+the sound waves that fall upon it, whether the medium
+be the air or any other substance, solid or liquid. And
+the space within which such effects are produced is the
+field of the first or sounding body. If one considers
+simply the air as the medium of the field, it will be
+perceived that sound waves travel in every direction in
+it, and to distances unlimited except by the presence of
+the air itself. Of course, the farther the distribution
+goes on the less energy there will be to any cubic inch
+or any other dimension, and there must be some limit
+\DPPageSep{323.png}{308}%
+\index{Thought transference}%
+where the energy is too small to affect the organs of
+hearing; but such a limit ought not to be considered
+the actual limit of sound vibrations or the field of the
+sounding body. There is no reason for doubting that
+every sound vibration of every kind and degree is distributed
+throughout the whole earth and its atmosphere,
+and more than that: as the impact of molecules in
+sound vibrations results in heating them to a higher
+temperature, increased radiation into space follows, and
+the consequent energy in this form must affect in some
+degree every particle of matter in the universe upon
+which it falls. It is plain how far-reaching almost every
+act and movement of every kind must be.
+
+A sound vibration, being a to-and-fro movement of a
+mass of matter, may easily be great enough to be seen,
+as in the case of a tuning-fork or a piano string; and,
+therefore, it is treated as being mechanical as distinguished
+from molecular: but even where the sound
+vibration is too slight to be seen as an actual displacement,
+it can give to another body a large amount of
+visible motion, as when a suspended marble is held
+against a sounding tuning-fork, or as when a paper
+windmill is held over a sounding Chladni plate.
+
+The motion of a sounding body being mechanical,
+the field it produces may be called the mechanical field,
+because the effect of it upon other bodies is similar in
+kind to that which produced the field. There are, therefore,
+five well-defined modes of physical action,---heat,
+electricity, magnetism, chemism, and sound,---which, in
+the past, have often been called physical forces, each
+one of which affects the medium about it, producing
+\DPPageSep{324.png}{309}%
+\index{Hair-cloth loom}%
+\index{Machines}%
+either a stress or a motion, or both---conditions that
+travel outwards into space indefinitely, and constitute as
+many different physical fields. They may all co-exist in
+the same space without interference, and each one produces
+upon other bodies of matter within it the same
+physical condition of motion, position, or arrangement as
+that which initiated the field itself. So the established
+relation deserves to be called a law better than many
+relations that are called laws, but are such only within
+rather narrow limits (as, for instance, the law of Charles
+and \DPtypo{Boyles}{Boyle's} Law), inasmuch as this law of physical fields
+is as universal as gravitation.
+
+What is called gravitation might be included in this
+list, for every particle of matter attracts every other
+particle near or far; so every atom has a gravitative
+field as extensive as the universe, and there is no more
+interference between it and the other fields than there
+is between any of them. The chief distinction between
+the gravitation field and all of the others is that
+they are all artificially\DPtypo{,}{} variable while gravitation is not
+known to be, though some phenomena indicate the
+possibility of it.
+
+It follows, from the foregoing, that every object large
+or small is continually affecting the space about it in
+several different ways,---through its temperature, electric
+and magnetic conditions, as well as by its various
+movements; and it also follows that the shape of a body
+as well as its molecular arrangement determines whether
+the field shall be symmetrical or otherwise. A crystal
+certainly has a symmetrical field, but it cannot be
+turned over in the hand without affecting in some degree
+everything outside of it.
+\DPPageSep{325.png}{310}%
+
+If it be true for certain collocations of matter that
+external form and molecular arrangement determine
+the existence of its field, it is difficult to imagine why
+it should not hold true for all cases,---a cell structure
+for instance, in which case the organization of a similar
+cell in adjoining space where the proper material for
+construction exists would only be in accordance with
+the physical properties of fields in general; and the
+phenomenon of growth would be as definitely understood
+as the growth of a crystal. This is not demonstrative;
+but it is in accordance with everything else we
+know, and is what would be predicted by one who knew
+the properties of physical fields, though he had no
+knowledge of cell growths.
+
+To take one step more, yet not to go beyond the domain
+of physics: It is as certain as any physical fact
+can be that every movement of an individual---change
+of attitude, gesture, or expression of countenance---must
+produce a corresponding change in his field, and
+tend to bring about in others similar movements; and,
+even if such phenomena are not observed in every one,
+it is no more of an argument against the existence of
+the operative conditions than is the failure to perceive
+through the sense of feeling the sound vibrations produced
+by a speaker's voice, when it is certain the whole
+body is in a state of tremor; and the effect of sympathetic
+speech is more largely physical than has been supposed.
+Strong emotions, or the physical semblance of
+them by skilful actors, re-act in the same physical way.
+This is not saying there may not be other factors, but
+the purely physical ones are present and act in the way
+\DPPageSep{326.png}{311}%
+\index{Motion, transformations of}%
+described. The term ``sympathetic action'' was applied
+to physical phenomena when it was discovered to be a
+mode of action quite analogous to mental phenomena
+between individuals in which similar mental states are
+induced.
+
+Lastly, so far as mental action depends upon brain
+structure, any changes in the latter must produce corresponding
+changes in the brain field, and there must
+be a brain field if there be any truth in the foregoing;
+the conclusion is inevitable. Other similar structures
+must be affected in some degree by them, and whether
+such induced changes be able to induce similar brain
+changes with the accompanying mental phenomena or
+not must evidently depend upon the possibility of
+synchronous action.
+
+This is not to be understood as asserting that such
+thought transference as is implied in the foregoing actually
+occurs. All that is asserted is that the physical
+conditions necessary for such transference actually
+exist, and one who was acquainted with the properties
+of physical fields would certainly predict the possibility
+of thought transference in certain cases.
+%\DPPageSep{327.png}{312}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XIII}{On Machines.---Mechanism}{312}
+
+\index{Push and pull}%
+
+The common notion of a machine is that it is an implement
+designed for doing this or that: as, for instance,
+a loom is a machine for weaving cloth or carpets; a
+steam-engine is a machine for driving machinery; a
+water-wheel, for utilizing the power of water; and so on.
+Some of these structures, built for specific purposes, are
+highly complex, and many of their parts stand in curious
+relation to each other, and altogether they may be able
+to produce results that seem but little short of intelligent
+action. Looms weave out beautiful fabrics with
+artistic designs in colors, when furnished with only the
+bare threads. The hair-cloth loom draws with iron fingers
+a single hair from a large bundle of hairs. If it
+fails to grasp one, another and another attempt is made
+until one is seized, and meanwhile the rest of the machinery
+waits. If it seizes more than one, as sometimes
+happens, it drops both and tries again, the rest of the
+apparatus waiting as before, exhibiting a kind of deliberativeness
+and consciousness of what it is about that
+one hardly looks for through any combination of wheels,
+ratchets, levers, and the like, such as make up a complex
+machine. Every one knows that by far the larger
+number of things in common use which were formerly
+\DPPageSep{328.png}{313}%
+made by hand tools are now made by machinery more
+rapidly and oftentimes more perfect than they could be
+made by hand. The parts of clocks and watches are
+so made; papers are printed, folded, and directed at
+the rate of ten thousand in an hour by one machine;
+grass is mown, grain is cut, threshed, and winnowed by
+one machine as fast as it can be driven through the
+field; shoes, toys, and beautiful pictures are thus made
+by the million, and there is no department of human
+effort but is dependent upon mechanism of some kind.
+In many cases the entire work is thus done automatically,
+as when pins and needles are made from the wire,
+sharpened, polished, counted, arranged in papers, and
+folded ready for the market. There is no field independent
+of such aids. Even music is absolutely dependent
+upon it, and all that is called sentiment and feeling
+in it are resolvable into degrees and directions of movements
+for the production of sounds; and there are no
+movements of muscles but may be duplicated by automatic
+mechanism. If the effects produced by mechanism
+to-day are not the effects wanted, it only shows
+that the mechanism has not been perfected, not that it
+cannot be done.
+
+If one considers the almost infinite number of processes
+needed for the maintenance, conveniences, comforts,
+and tastes of what is called civilized life, it might
+seem as if an almost unlimited number of physical conditions
+would be necessary; but let such an one recall
+the fact that all kinds of motions are reducible to not
+more than three fundamental kinds,---translatory, vibratory,
+and rotary,---and he will be prepared to trace
+\DPPageSep{329.png}{314}%
+\index{Lever}%
+\index{Pulley}%
+the most complicated movements to these elementary
+forms.
+
+In the chapter on motion, only the kinds of motion
+were considered; but here it is proposed to point out
+the conditions under which motion is transferred from
+one place to another, and how these elementary forms
+are transformed into each other. For convenience, the
+term ``mechanical motion'' will be employed for all having
+visible magnitude, but simply on the ground of visibility,
+not because there is any other distinction between
+such motions and those of a molecular or atomic kind.
+
+When one pushes against a paper-weight on the table
+and it moves in consequence, no one is surprised, for
+the movement is expected. If the weight were free to
+move and it did not move, no matter how strong the
+push, one would have reason to be surprised, because
+such a phenomenon is not in accordance with the
+experience of mankind. If one billiard-ball in contact
+with another one received a push in direction toward
+the latter, the latter would be moved in the same direction,
+and the motion of the second one would be explained
+by saying it was due to the push of the first
+upon it. Suppose there were ten or a hundred such
+balls in a line. If the end one was pushed towards the
+rest of them, they would all move, the farthest one as
+much as the first, as the movement imparted by push
+to the first would be handed on step by step to the last.
+If the balls were glued together at their points of contact,
+that would make no difference in this transfer of
+motion by contact; and, if there were a thousand or a million,
+or any other number, there would be no difference.
+\DPPageSep{330.png}{315}%
+\index{Work, measure of}%
+Neither would there be any difference if the separate
+balls were no bigger than molecules. A rod of wood
+or metal is entirely made up of a great number of cohering
+particles, and, when a push is applied to one end,
+every particle is pushed as much as the end particles.
+If there was a row of thin rubber balls and the end one
+was thus pushed, the side would be flattened somewhat,
+and the opposite side in contact with the next adjacent
+ball would push against its neighbor and each be flattened,
+and so on, till the last one was reached, which
+would be pressed on one side but not on the other, and
+would, therefore, be like a single ball pressed upon one
+side. The intermediate balls would act as transferrers of
+pressure from one end to the other. The rubber balls
+so flattened by pressure will recover their form when
+the pressure is removed, and the same may be said of
+a rod of any material, the difference in this particular
+being only one of degree. The same process takes
+place when one pulls upon a rod. It is to be remembered,
+however, that in either case the transmission of
+the pull is not instantaneous for any distance, however
+short. Time is requisite, and hence there is a rate of
+propagation of such motion in all bodies, which depends
+upon the degree of elasticity and the density of the
+material; and this rate cannot be exceeded, no matter
+how great the initial push or pull. This rate is about
+sixteen thousand feet per second for steel and the most
+elastic woods, and is about eleven hundred feet per
+second for air. If one inquires what the condition is
+that initiates motion in any given body, it will be found
+to be a push or a pull, and either of them may be measured
+\DPPageSep{331.png}{316}%
+in pounds. The chief distinction between a push
+and a pull lies in the relative position of the moving
+power and the body being moved by it. In the push,
+the body being moved leads in the line of movement;
+in the pull, the moving power leads. When a locomotive
+goes ahead of the train, it pulls; if the train goes
+ahead, it pushes. A stiff rod or bar may be used for
+either a push or a pull, but a rope can be used only for
+a pull, for when pressure is applied to it longitudinally
+it bends at right angles to the direction of the pressure,
+and so fails to act in the right direction. A rod can
+transmit a push or pull only in the direction of its
+length, while a rope may rest on a pulley and the pull
+may act upon any other body in the same plane the
+pulley turns in. If a pressure of ten pounds be applied
+as a push at one end of a rod or bar, the whole of that
+pressure may be transmitted to the other end. The
+same may be said of the pull either with a rod or rope,
+but neither rod nor rope can possibly transmit and give
+up at the one end more than is applied at the other.
+For this reason, a rope hanging over a pulley will hold
+equal weights on its two ends. If a ten-pound weight
+be tied to one end, the pull transmitted will be ten
+pounds, which may be balanced by a pull either by
+weight or in any other way on the other leg of the rope.
+The function of a pulley is to change the direction of
+the pull: it does not alter its amount.
+
+\Section{MECHANICAL MACHINES.}
+
+In the older treatises on natural philosophy, there
+were described several machines which were called the
+\DPPageSep{332.png}{317}%
+mechanical powers, because their principles were embodied
+in mechanical devices for transmitting pressure
+or pulls. The \emph{lever} stood first among them. It consists
+of a stiff rod or bar resting upon a point of support
+for it called a fulcrum, and this fulcrum may be
+placed anywhere between the ends of the bar. The
+advantage or disadvantage of this machine depends
+upon how near the fulcrum is to the body to be moved.
+A stiff rod four feet long supported at its middle would
+be balanced if it were of uniform dimensions. If a
+weight of ten pounds was hung at one end, an equal
+weight or pull would be needed at the other end to
+balance it. If one weight fell one foot, it would do ten
+foot-pounds of work in raising the other ten pounds
+one foot. In any case the work done, measured in
+foot-pounds, will be the same at both ends of the bar or
+lever.
+
+The lever changes the direction of motion or the
+amount of pressure, but does not change the amount
+of work measured in foot-pounds.
+
+The simple \emph{pulley} is a device for changing the direction
+of a pull, as seen in the apparatus for raising merchandise
+to higher levels in buildings; but by far the
+most extensive use of it is in the transfer of a continuous
+pull from one place to another through the agency
+of belts of leather or other pliable material.
+
+This combination of pulley and belt is adaptable to
+many places and purposes, as well as permitting great
+ranges in speeds of rotation by simply making the diameters
+of the pulleys proportional to the differences in
+rotation wanted. It is the chief agency in machine-%
+\DPPageSep{333.png}{318}%
+\index{Transformations of motion}%
+shops, factories, etc., for distributing the power to the
+various machines. By crossing the belt the second
+pulley can be made to turn in the opposite direction.
+
+In all the ways in which it is serviceable, it is plain
+that it cannot deliver more of a push or a pull than is
+given to it any more than can a lever. There is no
+gain of energy or work by its use, but always some loss,
+because friction uses up some of the working-power in
+other than useful ways. The \emph{wedge}, the \emph{inclined plane},
+and the \emph{screw} are but simple devices for utilizing push
+or pull; but there are other means also employed for the
+same purpose; for instance, the pressure of the air or
+other gas, and steam. Windmills are made to turn by
+the pressure of the wind upon the inclined blades, and,
+by forcing air into pipes, an increased pressure may be
+transmitted for long distances and then used. The
+reason this method of using air is not in more general
+use is that when the air is compressed it heats. The
+heat it loses soon if conveyed in pipes very far, and as a
+consequence its pressure is very much reduced, so it is
+not an economical thing to do. Water-wheels utilize
+the pressure of water, and the amount of work it can do
+is definite and easily calculated. If at a waterfall a
+hundred pounds of water falls ten feet, then it can do
+$100 \times 10 = 1,000$ foot-pounds of work; that is, it can
+raise $1,000$ pounds a foot high, and so on for any other
+amount. A perfect water-wheel that did not let slip
+by any water without its doing its work would give up
+practically $1,000$ foot-pounds. Really, the best water-wheels
+give but about ninety per cent of \DPtypo{the-working-power}{the working-power}
+of the water. So-called water-motors are but properly
+\DPPageSep{334.png}{319}%
+constructed wheels enclosed in the pipe through
+which water is made to flow with considerable pressure.
+In the cases of air, steam, and water power there is the
+condition we call a push, which may be measured in
+pounds; and a push measured in pounds multiplied by
+the distance in feet through which it is maintained is
+the measure of work.
+
+In each of the cases, the air, or steam, or water,
+as it moves on and does its work, gives up the motion
+it has; and the substance itself, being no longer of use,
+is allowed to escape as a waste product. Such bodies
+have been sometimes called \emph{prime-movers}.
+
+So far has been considered only the apparatus in
+common use for transferring motion of one body to
+other bodies, but frequently it is important to have the
+\emph{form} of the motion changed from the kind it may
+chance to have at the outset to one better adapted to
+the special end desired.
+
+In a sewing-machine, for instance, the particular
+movement of the needle must be vibratory. The
+treadle has a similar movement, but not rapid enough;
+so there is arranged between them a series of movable
+parts, which not only \emph{transfers} a certain amount of
+motion, but the latter is \emph{transformed} into appropriate
+forms. The vibratory motion of the treadle is transformed
+into the rotary motion of the balance-wheel,
+this into swifter rotation of the pulley by means of a
+belt; then by lever and cam the needle receives its
+proper kind of motion, the shuttle a similar one at
+right angles to that of the needle, and the other moving
+parts such forms of motion, and rates of motion, as
+\DPPageSep{335.png}{320}%
+are needful for their special kinds of work. In a steam-engine
+the constant pressure of the steam is made to
+act upon the alternate sides of a piston, giving it a
+vibratory motion, which must be transformed for most
+purposes into rotary; and this is effected by means of a
+crank, which is, therefore, a device for transforming vibratory
+motion into rotary, or \textit{vice versa}. When the
+driving-wheels of a locomotive are made to rotate, their
+adherence to the track carries the whole structure forward;
+that is, the rotary motion is transformed into
+translatory. In the stationary engine the rotary motion
+of the balance-wheel is transferred to a pulley by a
+belt, and the shafting transfers this through its whole
+length to other pulleys. If the reader will follow back
+to its antecedents any particular motion he may think
+of, he will see that the function of each movable part of
+a machine of any sort is to transfer push or pull, or
+transform one kind of motion into another kind. However
+complex a machine may be, it does no more.
+
+It is to be noted that \emph{what} a given thing will or may
+do depends altogether upon what kind or form of
+motion it has, not upon how much motion or energy
+it has. For instance, a bullet might spin on some axis
+on the table before one, and have great rotary velocity
+and energy, yet be perfectly harmless; whereas, if it
+had the same amount of energy with the motion translatory,
+it might be destructive to anything it struck.
+
+\Section{MOLECULAR MACHINES.}
+
+If one of the functions of a machine be to transform
+the kind of motion it is supplied with into some other
+\DPPageSep{336.png}{321}%
+kind of motion,---translatory into rotary or vibratory,
+any one into either of the others,---one may be prepared
+to follow mechanical processes from masses of
+visible magnitude into molecular magnitudes, and thus
+note the antecedents of the new phenomena that
+appear.
+
+When a gas is condensed by pressure the individual
+molecules have less free space to move in, and they
+consequently collide with each other more frequently.
+Being elastic, their average amplitude of vibration is
+increased proportionally, and a greater number of them
+will strike with greater velocity upon the walls of the
+containing vessel per second than before. Thus the
+temperature and the pressure of the gas are increased.
+We say that mechanical energy has been converted
+into heat energy, or sometimes simply into heat,
+though what has really happened has been the transformation
+of external translational motion into internal
+vibratory motion, which the elasticity and mobility
+of the molecules permit. When by friction or percussion
+a body is heated, the same thing precisely
+has happened: translatory motion has been transformed
+into vibratory, through the agency of the
+molecules, which have, therefore, acted as machines for
+transformation.
+
+In like manner the reverse transformation may take
+place in several ways. When the increased vibratory
+motion of the molecules produces an increased pressure
+upon the movable head of a piston in an engine, the
+piston as a whole may move and do work. Also, when
+the molecules strike harder upon one side of a surface
+\DPPageSep{337.png}{322}%
+than upon the other side, the surface moves toward
+the side of less pressure, as with the radiometer; so
+that both engine and radiometer are machines for
+\index{Machines}%
+transforming vibratory molecular motions into translatory
+mechanical motion.
+
+When the temperature of steam is raised to about
+$5,000°$~F., the amplitude of vibration is so great that the
+atoms can no longer cohere in the molecules, and they
+become separated into the gases hydrogen and oxygen;
+and again vibratory motion is transformed into translatory,
+which in gases is called free-path.
+
+Heat is also largely derived from the chemical properties
+of coal, wood, oils, gas, and other substances
+called fuel. As the heat is derived from some antecedent
+condition which is not heat, it follows that the
+stove or furnace is a machine for transforming into
+heat motions those motions which constitute and are
+the measure of chemism.
+
+When heat is applied in any way to the face of a
+thermo-pile, electricity may appear which may be made
+to do work in many ways. The vibratory motion disappears
+as such,---that is, it is annihilated,---while an
+electric current appears as its substitute. The thermo-pile
+is, therefore, a machine for the transformation of
+heat into electric current. If heat be a kind of molecular
+motion, then an electric current must be some
+other kind of motion!
+
+When the armature of a dynamo is turned and an
+electrical current is developed, the latter is the representative
+of the mechanical movement of the armature.
+It takes more power to make it move at a given
+\DPPageSep{338.png}{323}%
+speed when it is producing a current than when it is
+not. The current represents the difference. It is mechanical
+motion that goes into the dynamo, and an
+electrical current comes out of it; and hence a dynamo
+is a machine for the transformation of mechanical into
+electrical motion. One is visible, the other molecular,
+as is the case when friction develops heat.
+
+An ordinary static electrical machine possesses a
+similar function.
+
+On the other hand, a galvanic battery transforms
+chemical into electrical motions; and, in every case
+where electricity is developed, there is some sort of
+apparatus which receives one kind of motion for transformation.
+That one kind of machine will transform
+mechanical motion, a second heat, a third chemical, all
+into the same kind of a product, helps one to see that
+the antecedents, which at first seem to be so unlike,
+are really but varieties of the same condition, namely,
+motion, which, when transformed by suitable machines,
+might be expected to appear as a similar product of
+each.
+
+An electrical current always heats the conductor
+through which it passes. It is, therefore, an antecedent
+for the production of heat in the same sense as mechanical
+motion is an antecedent in condensation, percussion,
+and friction; and the conductor is the agency for
+the transformation into the vibratory molecular form.
+
+So far as the production of light by electricity is concerned,
+whether by the incandescent or the arc system,
+the function of the current is to raise the temperature
+of the conductor to the proper degree for luminousness.
+\DPPageSep{339.png}{324}%
+The light comes from the hot molecules, not from the
+electricity; but here, as in the simpler case of heating
+the conductor, the conductor itself, whether it be a filament
+of carbon or the tips of the carbon rods, acts as a
+transformer of electrical into heat motions, and thence
+to ether waves.
+
+Ether waves may be transformed in two different
+ways. First, by falling on molecules of matter; the
+latter absorb them, and are heated in consequence,
+which is the converse of the production of ether waves
+by heated molecules. Second, by their own interferences
+plane, elliptical, and spiral waves may be produced,
+which resultant waves are capable of affecting matter
+in different ways. One of these consequences is of so
+much theoretic importance it will be well to allude
+to it.
+
+Given a flexible section of a spiral ether wave, no
+matter what its origin. If its ends were to come together,
+there is good reason for thinking they would
+close and weld together, forming a ring, which would
+then be practically a vortex ring. The ends of vortex
+rings formed in the air will do thus, so if the atoms of
+matter are really vortex rings, as has been supposed,
+the above suggests how they may originate, or how
+matter is created.
+
+All the different kinds of phenomena which are generally
+attributed to different forces one may readily
+trace to these antecedents; namely, matter, ether, and
+motion of various forms. The condition necessary for
+a new phenomenon to appear is that the present forms
+of motion in either matter or ether needs to be transformed.
+\DPPageSep{340.png}{325}%
+Atoms and molecules, as well as large masses
+of them, which we call bodies of visible magnitude, act
+as machines for the transferrence and the transformation
+of motion; and one might define a machine as a \emph{collocation
+of matter having for its function the transferrence or
+the transformation of motion, or both}. An atom and a
+molecule, then, are as much machines as a steam-engine
+or a dynamo; and every molecule in the universe,
+whether near or remote, is constantly receiving and
+transforming energy through its individual motions.
+What the particular phenomenon will be in a given
+case depends upon the form of the motion received by
+the mechanism and the new form which the latter has
+made it to assume. As before remarked, what a given
+mass of matter will do depends upon the kind of motion
+it has.
+
+So far nothing has been said about the relation of
+these mechanical principles to living things,---animals
+and plants; but it will be obvious to every thinking
+person that unless, when matter assumes the forms exhibited
+by such living things, it surrenders its mechanical
+properties and relations, then such transformations
+must be going on constantly in all living things. Mechanical
+motions, chemical re-actions, heat, and so on,
+ought to be expected from such complex machines as
+animals. Foods, as fuel, air, and water, are physical
+factors which imply metamorphosis; and the forms into
+which the factors will be changed depend upon the
+special mechanism provided. Hence, an animal is a
+complex machine for the transformation of motions of
+various sorts, the sum of them being what are called
+the phenomena of life.
+\DPPageSep{341.png}{326}%
+\index{Solar system}%
+
+The foregoing analysis shows that what have heretofore
+been considered as forces in nature are non-existent;\DPnote{** Only instance.}
+that all phenomena in the different fields of
+physics are simply and plainly mechanical; and that
+an application of the laws of motion, as presented by
+Sir Isaac Newton, supplemented by the laws of ether
+action, is sufficient to account for all kinds of phenomena:
+and therefore the supposition of particular forces
+of any kind is entirely unnecessary. What have been
+called forces are but various forms of motion, of matter,
+or of the ether, each embodying energy; the particular
+phenomenon a given body may produce depending
+upon its size and the particular quality of motions it
+chances to have. Granting this, one may at once perceive
+that expressions implying higher and lower forms
+of force are misleading. No one is higher in dignity or
+importance than any other one. Let one ask the question,
+Which is higher, vibratory or translatory motion?
+and he will see the absurdity of the language.
+
+If one will bear these principles in mind, they will be
+helpful in unravelling phenomena which otherwise may
+appear to be very puzzling. For instance, one may frequently
+come across the statement that one cannot get
+out of a machine what is not in it or put into it. Is it
+so? Coal is put into the furnace, and heat comes out.
+Mechanical motion is put into a dynamo, and electricity
+comes out. A current of electricity is turned into an
+arc lamp, and light comes out. The character of the
+product thus depends upon the form of the machine
+and its relation to some antecedent factor. The physical
+\DPPageSep{342.png}{327}%
+\index{Physical universe a machine}%
+knowledge we have enables us in most cases to
+trace and understand the metamorphosis. In some
+cases the molecular changes are not so completely
+known in detail, yet the quantitative relations between
+what goes in and what comes out of the machine are so
+definite that one is warranted in asserting that no other
+factors are present than the one considered. In one
+sense the product of any machine is like its antecedent,
+if both be but kinds of motion, or forms of energy as
+some prefer to say; but if one assumes that these
+various forms of energy differ in any way from forms
+of motion, or that they have distinct individualities,
+then one can get out of a machine what he does not put
+into it. What seem to be more unlike than the mechanical
+movements of a steam-engine and the electricity
+of the dynamo? One is simplicity itself; the
+nature of the other, its product, has been the despair of
+philosophers for generations. The subject is of fundamental
+importance chiefly because some philosophers
+have evolved their schemes without duly considering
+these obvious relations.
+
+However much a given phenomenon may differ in
+character from its known antecedents, no good reason
+can be assigned for thinking that, when properly analyzed,
+it would be found resolvable into other factors
+than matter, ether, and motion. Furthermore, there is
+no evidence that any one of the physical forms of
+motion is or was necessarily prior to any other. As
+there is no hierarchy among them, no one of them can
+be called primal. A linear arrangement does not
+\DPPageSep{343.png}{328}%
+\index{Matter, as modes of motion}%
+properly represent their mutual relations. They are
+more like a closed ring of interrelations thus:---
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{center}
+ \Graphic{2.5in}{343a}
+ \Figlabel{35}
+
+ {\scriptsize Diag.\ 35.---Forms of Energy.}
+\end{center}
+
+The visible universe may be considered as a vast
+machine, within which motions are being exchanged
+by contact and by radiation. It is not the absolute
+amount of energy a body may have which determines
+whether it shall give or receive, but it is the degree
+it has of a given kind of energy. Thus it is the temperature
+of a body that determines for it whether it
+shall gain or lose heat in the presence of other bodies.
+The whole tendency is towards equalization of conditions,
+and for this reason some philosophers think they
+foresee the end of this act in the drama of the solar
+system. The possibility of the variety of phenomena
+that gives interest to existence depends upon the fact
+that at present matter is in an unstable condition, and,
+when uniformity of condition is reached, there will be
+an end to changing phenomena. Astronomers have
+figured out that in five or ten millions of years the sun
+\DPPageSep{344.png}{329}%
+\index{Cohesion, in solids and liquids}%
+\index{Matter, states of}%
+will have radiated away so much of his energy that the
+earth will no longer be habitable. Perhaps so; but it
+is certain that the whole solar system is drifting in space
+somewhere at the rate of seven hundred millions of
+miles a year, and in one million of years it may reach a
+region in space where the present rate of loss might be
+greatly reduced. In that time it will have travelled
+three times the distance to the nearest of the fixed
+stars. It could hardly be where its expenditure would
+be greater than now. If it should drift into one of the
+great hydrogen regions such as are numerous in the
+heavens, not only would the supply of energy be renewed
+indefinitely, but the earth would become uninhabitable
+in an hour. At any rate, there is no guarantee
+in nature for permanent stability, supposing that stability
+should be attained; for simple mechanical impact
+between the sun and any of the millions of stars would
+not only annihilate the earth as such, but would so
+reduce to a nebulous mass the matter that now composes
+the solar system that the whole process of world
+formation would have to be gone through with again.
+The sudden blazing out of stars here and there in the
+heavens shows that similar physical processes are taking
+place elsewhere in the universe. Such an end is
+quite as probable as the refrigerating one referred to;
+for there is implied in the latter not only that the present
+conditions in the solar system will continue, but
+that the environment of the solar system will remain
+for so many millions of years what it is. The matter
+is not alluded to here on account of its humanitarian
+\DPPageSep{345.png}{330}%
+\index{Cohesion, destroyed}%
+\index{Gas, motion in}%
+interest, but to point out that in either case the results
+will be due to purely physical conditions. What mankind
+would contemplate as a dreadful catastrophe would
+be but the interaction of huge machines, where energy
+was transformed on a grand scale, and no particle of
+matter omitted for an instant to conform to the three
+laws of motion.
+%\DPPageSep{346.png}{331}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XIV}{Properties of Matter as Modes of Motion}{331}
+
+\index{Gas, free path in}%
+\index{Gas, pressure in}%
+
+In the first chapter of the book only the most
+obvious qualities of matter are considered, such as
+magnitude, density, inertia, and so on, the properties
+which are exhibited by masses of matter of visible
+magnitude and form, from which the common notions
+concerning its nature and possibilities have been derived.
+If one stops his inquiries concerning the properties
+of matter with these, and imagines that they are
+the ultimate properties, and may rightly be assumed
+and asserted of the individual atoms, he will be greatly
+in error; for it is not difficult to show that nearly
+every property of masses cannot be true of atoms, and
+that nearly if not quite all material properties of what
+we call matter, are derived from antecedent conditions,
+and are resolvable into them or into mere relations
+which are not inherent, and may be absent. It is,
+then, worth the while to study the real significance
+of some of the physical terms in common use, in
+order the better to eliminate from the mind unessential
+qualities when thinking of the inherent qualities
+of matter.
+
+During the past ten years laboratory facilities for
+physical investigations have greatly aided inquirers,
+\DPPageSep{347.png}{332}%
+\index{Heat, effects}%
+and added much to real knowledge in this field. Some
+of this knowledge is of such a character as will presently
+make it needful for every one to reconstruct
+his notions and explanations of physical phenomena,
+in order to prevent hopeless confusion in his own
+thinking.
+
+\Section{THE STATES OF MATTER.}
+
+Under the conditions of ordinary observations matter
+is found in the solid, liquid, and gaseous states;
+the solid state being that in which the molecules
+cohere so strongly as not to be easily separated from
+each other nor from the relative positions they have
+assumed with reference to other molecules. Thus, a
+piece of granite, as the type of a solid, may have its
+molecules cohering to each other in certain positions,
+so strongly as to require a ton's weight to pull apart
+a section of one square inch.
+
+The granite is made up of small crystals of quartz,
+mica, and feldspar, each having a definite chemical
+composition. The individual crystals retain their relative
+places for an indefinite time, and the atoms of the
+individual molecules retain their relative positions for
+a like indefinitely long time, else the crystalline structure
+would be lost, for crystalline structure implies
+definite atomic arrangement as well as molecular
+arrangement. So in solids the adjacent molecules
+are in what are called stable positions, and are not
+easily separated.
+
+In a liquid there is little cohesion among the molecules,
+and no stable arrangement at all. The individual
+molecules move among each other without
+\DPPageSep{348.png}{333}%
+\index{Absolute zero}%
+\index{Charles, Law of}%
+\index{Chemism and heat}%
+\index{Chemical reactions depend on temperature}%
+\index{Gas, pressure in}%
+\index{Gas, destroyed}%
+\index{Matter, effect of temperature upon}%
+apparent friction, and the slightest force acting upon
+them makes them to turn on any axis; and there is
+good reason for thinking that in a liquid like water,
+the individual molecules are continuously rolling and
+tossing about with perfect freedom to move in every
+direction. The phenomena of diffusion exemplifies
+this. There is also good reason for thinking that the
+individual atoms in the water are continuously changing
+partners at a rapid rate, so if there were some
+means for identifying the atoms of hydrogen and oxygen
+in a given molecule, they might be seen presently
+all separated and forming temporary constituents of
+other molecules a relatively long remove from the first
+position where they were observed. When the water
+is frozen, that is has become a crystalline solid, this
+freedom of atomic change and molecular rotations is
+no longer recognized as a property. Molecular cohesion
+is now exhibited where before there was none.
+There are also new qualities called crystalline, hardness,
+density, and so on, which before this change did
+not belong to it. The new qualities which seem to
+have been developed are produced by lowering the temperature
+of the water, that is, reducing the amount
+of kinetic energy the molecules had; and by again
+imparting a like amount to the ice \emph{both crystallization
+and cohesion are destroyed}.
+
+A gas is a body of molecules in which the individuals
+are free to move in every direction unconstrained by
+any degree of cohesion, and where they are in frequent
+collisions, bounding away in new directions through
+distances usually many times the diameter of the molecules
+\DPPageSep{349.png}{334}%
+themselves. Thus, in air the ordinary average
+distance between impacts is nearly two hundred times
+the diameter of the individual particles which, as before
+stated, is in the neighborhood of one fifty-millionth of
+an inch. Their continuous bumping against each other
+and the walls of the containing vessel, produces what
+is called the gaseous pressure. Increasing the temperature
+of the gas increases the velocity of movement
+in the free path, and, consequently, the momentum and
+the pressure. It has been customary to say that heat
+increases the elasticity of a gas, that a gas occupies
+the whole space which encloses it, that a gas has a
+tendency to indefinite expansion, and that the properties
+of a gas are due to repulsive force among the
+molecules. In a loose sense such expressions may be
+allowed, but they are not to be understood as correctly
+specifying the qualities of the gaseous matter. It is
+not repulsion that makes a ball move which has been
+struck by a bat, but impact; and that it should continue
+to move on until it strikes another body, follows
+from the first law of motion, as true for a molecule of
+a gas as for a baseball. The direction the ball takes
+depends upon where it is hit, as well as upon how hard
+it is hit; the velocity it has depends upon how hard it
+is hit, and there is nothing peculiar to a gaseous particle
+requiring the affirmation of different properties.
+
+Some years ago improved methods of making a
+vacuum were adopted, by which one could reduce the
+amount of gas in a tube to even the hundred millionth
+of its ordinary amount, so that a particle might have a
+relatively long free path measurable in feet instead of
+\DPPageSep{350.png}{335}%
+\index{Diamond, hardness of}%
+\index{Hardness not atomic property}%
+hundred thousandths of an inch, and the phenomena
+of such rarefied gases were so new and surprising that
+it was at first conjectured that a new state of matter
+had been discovered, and it was called the fourth or
+ultra gaseous state to distinguish it from the others;
+but it was soon perceived that it was still only rarefied
+gas, and that no new qualities had been developed, and
+the same phenomena witnessed in the rarefied gas were
+present in the denser, only disguised by the greater
+number of molecules which took part. So what was
+called for a short time the fourth state has been
+practically abandoned.
+
+The three states already considered are known to
+depend upon temperature. Thus, if ice or iron or
+many other solids be heated they become liquid; if
+heated still more they become gaseous. Some solids,
+like wood, when heated do not assume the liquid intermediate
+form, but are at once converted into a gas;
+but different substances have different temperatures at
+which they change from one form to the other. Thus,
+water becomes a solid at $32°$~Fah., and a gas at $212°$~Fah.
+Iron becomes fluid at~$2,800°$ and gaseous at~$6,000°$. So
+far, then, it appears one might as properly speak of
+iron as a liquid or a gas, as of water as either, if they
+both may exist in the three conditions, and no temperature
+is specified. We do not do that, because when
+speaking thus ordinary temperatures are implied, but
+seldom or never thought of. If one had been brought
+up in the sun it is probable he would never have seen
+a solid, and if at the moon, he would know of neither
+liquid nor gas.
+\DPPageSep{351.png}{336}%
+\index{Color, nature of}%
+
+But the pressure of a gas is caused by the impact of
+its molecules, and is proportionate to the temperature.
+The law of Charles states what has been found to be
+true within the limits of experiment; namely, that the
+volume of a gas is proportionate to its absolute temperature;
+that is, temperature measured from an absolute
+zero, in which case, it is plainly to be seen, at
+absolute zero the \emph{gaseous} volume would be nothing.
+It does not imply that the matter of the gas would be
+annihilated, but that the matter no longer existed in
+its gaseous form; the individual molecules would no
+longer have any free path motion, but would fall to
+the floor of the containing vessel, and thus remain
+quiescent, like so much dust. \emph{At absolute zero there
+would be no gas.}
+
+Again, in the chapter on Chemism it is shown how
+chemical reactions are determined by temperature, and
+cannot take place in the absence of heat. The late
+experiments of Pictet and Dewar show that as temperature
+is lowered chemical reactions become weaker
+and weaker, until some of the elements that have very
+strong affinities at ordinary temperatures, and so combine
+with energy, are incapable of combining, and
+appear inert at such low temperatures as can now
+be artificially made without great difficulty. Their
+experiments confirm the conclusions given on \Pageref{page}{242};
+namely, that at absolute zero chemical affinity
+does not exist. Molecules would not only fall apart,
+but their individual atoms would no longer exhibit
+any cohesive quality; and this, it will be perceived,
+would render the existence of such a thing as either
+\DPPageSep{352.png}{337}%
+\index{Impenetrability}%
+a liquid or a solid quite impossible, for each requires
+chemical action for both molecular formations and
+cohesion in any degree. Every kind of a structure
+would crumble to atoms in a literal sense. Book,
+tower, mountain, ocean, as well as every living organism,
+would completely disintegrate, and lose every characteristic
+property which had belonged to it. Hence,
+such qualities of matter as would be absolutely emptied
+out of it by simply reducing its temperature, cannot
+be considered as essential qualities. Yet when the
+atoms were thus deprived of what seems to us as all
+their useful qualities, there is reason for thinking they
+would still have definite form, mass, gravitation, magnetic
+and electric qualities which, however, by themselves
+could not make the mass of matter we call the
+earth a habitable place, nor give to life a material
+habitat as it now has.
+
+It is then plainly evident that what we call solids,
+liquids, and gases, with all the laws that belong to each
+of them, are simply the relations of heat energy to
+groups of atoms, not the properties or laws that may
+be asserted of the atoms as such, and do not need to
+be considered by one who is inquiring for the essential
+endowments of matter.
+
+There remains, therefore, an examination of the
+other so called qualities to see if, perchance, they
+too may not, in a similar manner, be resolvable into
+energy relations, which, in turn, may be absent.
+\DPPageSep{353.png}{338}%
+\index{Elasticity}%
+\index{Elasticity due to motion}%
+
+\Section{MOLECULAR AND ATOMIC QUALITIES.}
+\Subsection{(HARDNESS.)}
+
+Substances vary greatly in what is called hardness,
+and this properly serves, in many cases, to distinguish
+one mineral from another. The mineralogist employs
+a scale of ten, differing in degree from talc which is
+the softest, to diamond which is the hardest, and with
+these all other minerals are compared. But the mineralogist
+tells us that this scale does not represent hardness
+in any proportional way, because diamond is as
+much as ten times harder than the ruby which stands
+next to it in the scale; also that some diamonds are so
+much harder than others, that no means has yet been
+discovered for grinding and polishing them.
+
+The diamond, however, is crystallized carbon, yet carbon
+exists in another crystalline form called graphite,
+or plumbago, which is soft, and may be whittled with
+a knife, while coke, charcoal, and lampblack are forms
+of precisely the same element, and these vary through
+the whole range in hardness. What, then, does hardness
+mean? Evidently it signifies the resistance
+offered to the separation of molecules from each other.
+It is the measure of their cohesion, and could have no
+existence in a single molecule of carbon. Furthermore,
+as has been pointed out, as molecular structure
+can have no existence at absolute zero for lack of
+energy needed for maintaining cohesion, \emph{hardness cannot
+be a property of atoms at all}.
+\DPPageSep{354.png}{339}%
+
+\Subsection{COLOR.}
+
+Color, either simple or compound, is exhibited by all
+masses of matter---for white is but a mixture of wave
+lengths, and no object is so black as to be invisible.
+Gold is yellow, copper red, lead is bluish. The petals
+of flowers, the feathers of birds, the gorgeous dyes of
+the chemist, seem to impress us with an assurance that
+color is a real quality of some kinds of matter, and can
+be affirmed of it without any qualifications. Bodies
+become visible either by their own luminousness as
+when they are hot or phosphorescent, or by the light
+reflected by them from some other source, as is most
+commonly the case. When sunlight falls upon a rose
+it is to be remembered that the sunlight is what we
+call white light; it is made up of all wave lengths which
+we can see. The rose petals absorb some of these
+waves,---the blue, the green, and the yellow, but not
+the red; these are rejected by the surface, and they
+therefore are reflected away, and testify to the selective
+power of the petals, \emph{not their color}, as can be found
+by holding the same rose in yellow or blue light, when
+it will appear black, that is, will absorb all offered to it
+and reflect little or none. Again, when a body is self-luminous,
+as, for example, a piece of burning sodium
+which gives out a yellow light, it is to be kept in mind
+that the yellow rays are produced by certain vibratory
+rates which the atoms are compelled for the time
+being to make, but which the atoms will not make
+except on compulsion, that is, the high temperature
+which the heat energy gives to it, and therefore does
+\DPPageSep{355.png}{340}%
+not represent what can be called the color of the body---only
+an artificial state of vibration. Lastly, if all
+substances whatever were at absolute zero in temperature,
+they would be setting up no ether waves of any
+length, and could not effect any organ of vision, and,
+consequently, would not only show no color, but would
+be absolutely invisible. \emph{Hence color cannot be affirmed
+of atoms.}
+
+\Subsection{IMPENETRABILITY.}
+
+It has seemed to nearly every one who has given
+thought to the subject that what is called impenetrability
+must be a fundamental property of matter;
+that it was axiomatic, if anything could be, that two
+masses of matter could not occupy the same space
+at the same time. This has been believed to be
+true, not because it was demonstrable, but because
+it seemed to be reasonable. Maxwell, however, calls
+it a vulgar opinion. He further takes the pains to
+say, If hydrogen and oxygen combine to form water,
+we have no experimental evidence that the molecule
+of oxygen is not in the very same place with the two
+molecules of hydrogen.\footnote
+ {See Art. Atom.\quad Encyc. Brit., 9th ed.}
+
+When it is possible to make one, a mechanical model
+is often of great assistance in helping one to conceive
+of conditions which are more or less difficult to describe
+in mere words; and a mechanical model that
+embodies this possibility of the coexistence of two
+atoms in precisely the same space may easily be made.
+Roll up a length of wire into a loose helix or spiral of
+any convenient length---say two feet long. Cut it in
+\DPPageSep{356.png}{341}%
+\index{Hertz waves}%
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+\index{Tesla ether waves}%
+two parts of equal length, and bend the ends of each
+round until they touch, and fasten them thus, so as to
+have two rings made of spirals of wire. Each one may
+be taken as representing an atom of matter somewhat
+similar to a vortex ring, which has been assumed as
+\index{Vortex ring model}%
+the probable form of the atoms of matter. Each has
+form, size, and various other qualities, but if one of
+them be pressed down upon the other it will be found
+they will make room for each other, so that \emph{as rings
+they both occupy precisely the same space}. This is not
+given here as anything more than as, possibly, a
+helpful suggestion as to how a seemingly impossible
+condition may be true. Evidently in this case the
+difficulty lies in the assumption that an atom of matter
+is a hard, impenetrable, geometrical solid, and, as Maxwell
+says, there is no proof that such is the fact.
+\emph{Impenetrability is an unwarrantable assumption.}
+
+\Subsection{ELASTICITY.}
+
+Elasticity has been assumed to be a fundamental
+property of atoms, and so not derivable from physical
+conditions underlying it; but Lord Kelvin has shown
+good reason for thinking that elasticity is a derived
+quality, for it is possible to construct models which
+exhibit the phenomenon in a high degree while they
+are in motion, and not at all while they are at rest. A
+number of gyroscopic disks set whirling on a circular
+axis, shows this in a remarkable way, and suggests on
+inspection, that something like such an arrangement
+may be the complete explanation of the quality as
+exhibited by atoms. A vortex ring may be considered
+\DPPageSep{357.png}{342}%
+\index{Inertia}%
+\index{Mass}%
+as a large number of revolving disks on a circular
+\Pagelabel{342}% [** PP: Best guess at page anchor]
+axis, which will give to the ring not only rigidity, but
+stability of form, any departure from which will be
+resisted by the mechanical structure, and it will return
+to its original form after the deforming stress has
+ceased, with a rate depending upon the rate of rotation
+of the constituent
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[15]{l}{1.375in}
+ \Graphic{1.375in}{357a}
+ \Caption{36}{Diag.\ 36.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+parts of the ring. On \Pageref{page}{40}
+reference is made to the behavior of a rotating disk,
+and how it simulates this property of elasticity. The
+common gyroscope may be cited as exhibiting it in a
+\index{Gyroscope}%
+manner that depends upon the
+way in which the disk is mechanically
+mounted.
+
+An ordinary whirling disk can
+be freely moved only in its plane
+of rotation, or planes parallel to
+that. Any attempt to change
+the angle of the axis is mechanically
+resisted. This may be understood
+by reference to diagram
+where $a$~$b$ is a disk capable of
+rotation on axis $c$~$d$. While rotating,
+it can move freely in the
+plane $a$~$b$, but any attempt to tip
+the axis in any direction will be
+resisted by it. Imagine, then, a large number of similar
+disks, mounted on a circular axis, as in diagram~36,
+each one rotating. It is plain that any attempt to tip
+the ring in one direction or the other, or to change
+the form of the ring itself, supposing it to be flexible,
+will necessarily change the plane of some of the revolving
+\DPPageSep{358.png}{343}%
+disks, and will be resisted as a whole, for the
+same reason that one of its parts will do the same. It
+will be seen that if all these disks be rotating in the
+same direction the movements will be like those of a
+vortex ring. If additional disks could be inserted
+upon the axis, so as to form a continuous body quite
+round the circular axis, it would constitute a ring;
+and if the proper rotation were set up, it would possess
+all the qualities of a vortex ring, and elasticity
+would be a prominent quality, as stated on \Pageref{page}{39}. It
+is no longer necessary, if it ever was, to assume elasticity
+as a fiat quality, imposed upon atoms which
+might have existed without it; \emph{for the laws of motion,
+acting in a properly constructed mechanism, are quite
+sufficient to produce it}.
+
+\Subsection{MAGNETISM.}
+
+On \Pageref{page}{205} the statement is made that magnetic
+phenomena have led to the belief that all atoms of
+all kinds of matter are magnetic, and are only obscured
+in ordinary matter by the molecular arrangements
+which tend to neutralize the magnetic fields of the
+individual atoms. Attention is again invited to the
+diagrams on \Pageref{page}{105}, with the accompanying description,
+in order to freshly bring to mind how vortex
+motion necessarily produces what is called polarity---the
+two sides of the ring have different qualities.
+On one side the movements are all inwards, on the
+other outwards, and from these the phenomena of
+apparent attraction and repulsion necessarily follow.
+But beyond this, once\DPnote{** PP: Missing "we"?} assume that individual atoms
+\DPPageSep{359.png}{344}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+are magnets by virtue of their constitution, and that
+every magnet has a magnetic field infinite in extent,
+within which it can affect other atoms, one can see
+at once that every atom in creation has a magnetic
+hold upon every other atom, because every one is
+in the magnetic field of every other one. This effect
+is not necessarily one of attraction or repulsion tending
+to move one mass towards or away from another;
+but, on the other hand, it tends to rotate each on an
+axis so both shall face the same way. So long as
+there is no change in position or in \emph{form} of such a
+magnet, the magnetic field will be uniform; but if the
+form be changed in any way the whole field has to
+change in conformity with it, as described on \Pageref{page}{252},
+and such vibrations as constitute the heat of an atom
+are really the change in form of the atom, and this,
+therefore, changes necessarily the whole magnetic
+field of the vibrating body. These changes in the
+field, which originate in this way, are what are called
+ether waves. When the waves are produced slowly,
+by an alternating dynamo current, or more swiftly by
+some of the methods so ingeniously devised by Hertz
+and Tesla, they are called electro-magnetic waves.
+When produced so swiftly as to have a wave length
+only the one thirty-thousandth of an inch, they have
+been called heat waves; and when the waves are so
+short as to be capable of affecting the retina of the
+eye, they are called light waves, though there is no
+distinction between any of them except in their length.
+The vibrations of the atomic magnet are rapid because
+it is small; the waves it produces are changes in
+\DPPageSep{360.png}{345}%
+\index{Gravity follows from structure}%
+its magnetic field in the ether, so one may trace
+back in this manner the phenomena of light, of heat,
+and electricity, to the mechanical structure of atoms;
+and it is mechanically intelligible too, and, like the
+preceding accounts of properties, it appears \emph{that magnetic
+and electric qualities are due to the peculiar kinds
+of motion embodied in the atoms}, and cannot be considered
+as particular endowments of a something called
+matter, which it might have been without.
+
+\Subsection{INERTIA.}
+
+The inertness of matter has been touched upon on
+\Pageref{page}{70}, and here may be added the consideration of
+what interpretation could be put upon such phenomena
+as are exhibited by such a device as is represented by
+diagram 36, supposing it were enclosed in a box so one
+could not see the mechanism? The box enclosing it
+would exhibit a new quality of the nature of inertia,
+by virtue of the motions within it, which it would lose
+as the friction diminished the rate of motion, and
+when this stopped altogether the property would no
+longer be present. \emph{Hence, inertia, too, must be looked
+upon as probably due to motion.}
+
+\Subsection{MASS.}
+
+Mass, as a property of matter, is generally defined
+as the amount of matter considered, and is measured
+by what is called acceleration, that is, the velocity
+it acquires in a second when acted on by a constant
+force or push. Amount of matter is a very indefinite
+expression, but is often convenient, and seldom misleading
+\DPPageSep{361.png}{346}%
+\index{Atoms, as vortex rings}%
+when one is considering a given weight of a
+substance.
+
+One may speak of a pound of iron or of hydrogen
+as a mass of iron or of hydrogen, meaning a definite
+weight made up of a very large number of molecules
+of one or the other element; but if one will think of
+the atoms of these, and endeavor to form an idea of
+what can be the physical meaning of mass, when applied
+to one of them, he will at once see that the term
+carries with it no conception whatever of the physical
+difference between atoms of different kinds. An
+atom of iron is said to contain fifty-six times the mass
+of an atom of hydrogen, while an atom of gold has
+a hundred and ninety-six times the mass of the hydrogen
+atom, and all the elements differ in mass in the
+ratio of their atomic weights. Can any one suppose
+for an instant, that an atom of gold is a hundred and
+ninety-six times larger than an atom of hydrogen?
+There is some evidence that atoms differ somewhat
+in magnitude from each other, but none of any such
+difference as is represented by their atomic weights.
+Furthermore, this would imply that atoms were blocks
+of some primeval stuff of uniform quality, and that
+atoms of a given element were but uniform volumes
+of it; and it hardly needs to be said that such a view
+is negatived by all we know, for the properties of the
+various elements do not vary simply with their weights,
+as would be the case if they were thus constituted.
+Hence, mass as applied to atoms cannot be thus conceived.
+It is possible to form a conception of the
+physical meaning of mass as applied to atoms or
+\DPPageSep{362.png}{347}%
+molecules, by recalling the phenomenon of rigidity
+in position, which is the outcome of rotations, as described
+on pages \Pageref{}{40}~and~\Pageref{}{342}, for the amount of effort
+needed to move such a rotating body depends not
+simply upon the amount of rotating material, but its
+velocity of rotation; so a small amount of material
+with a high speed may offer as great a resistance to
+movement from its position as another much larger
+amount of material with corresponding slower rate,
+but otherwise the two would necessarily have great
+differences in their other properties; thus their rates
+of vibration would be very different, because their
+degrees of elasticity would be different.
+
+One may then assume that such differences between
+\emph{the atoms of the elements as are called their masses,
+are due to the relative rates of rotation}. This, of
+course, on the fundamental assumption that the atoms
+themselves are vortex rings such as we have argued as
+being highly probable.
+
+\Subsection{GRAVITY.}
+
+There now remains to be considered one more
+general property of atoms and all combinations of
+them; namely, their gravitative property. If one be
+content to say that not enough is known about it
+to warrant even a tentative opinion, and, therefore,
+refuses to draw any inferences from what is known
+as to what gravitative property is, or is like, one
+need to have no quarrel with such an one; but if,
+on the other hand, one is interested in fundamental
+questions, and thinks that whatever be the truth
+\DPPageSep{363.png}{348}%
+\index{Hertz waves}%
+\index{Materialists}%
+about gravitation or any other unsolved problem, when
+it is known, it will be seen to be in harmony with
+every other physical truth, and will, therefore, be a
+consistent part of the body of physical knowledge
+which we now possess, such an one will perceive that
+with the banishment of the old notions concerning the
+structure of matter, with its endowments of sundry
+properties which might have been otherwise, or that
+the matter we know might have had entirely different
+properties, must also go the notion of quality endowments
+in any such sense as was formerly held. He
+will also have good reason for holding it altogether
+probable, that if the other properties of matter are
+reducible to modes of motion, so the last one in
+the list will be found to be reducible to the same
+factor. If the others have been interpreted thus, one
+after another yielding as molecular phenomena became
+better understood, he will conclude that if the problem
+of gravitation has not been solved, as the others
+have been, it is not because it is insoluble in itself, but
+because it is inherently more difficult, or has not received
+the degree of attention that has been given to
+other problems since conservation has been discovered
+and forms a part of every discussion.
+
+One thing seems certain, if the vortex-ring theory
+of matter be true, or anything like it, then gravity
+must follow from the structure; for in the absence of
+any evidence of the existence of gravitation in the
+ether, no one is at liberty to postulate it there for
+the sake of finding it in the atoms. It must be looked
+for as due to the particular kind of motion that constitutes
+\DPPageSep{364.png}{349}%
+\index{Ether phenomena not explained}%
+the atom, and is constant because that motion
+is constant.
+
+In the chapter on gravitation is given a mechanical
+conception of gravitative conditions which, whatever
+may be its inadequacy, is consistent with other physical
+knowledge. Faraday, as is well known, made
+several efforts to discover some relation between
+gravitation and electricity, but only negative results
+were reached. He was not discouraged by his lack
+of success, and had planned still other experiments,
+which he was not able to finish. He always worked
+on some hypothesis almost always radically different
+from the hypotheses of his scientific contemporaries,
+and time has vindicated his rather than theirs; and
+that there must be some physical relation between
+the two classes of phenomena was one of his, and so
+it seems to-day; for if gravity be due to the form of
+motion in the atom, and if an electric current in a
+circuit represents a real vortex ring, having the conductor
+for its core, then it seems likely there is some
+gravitative effect between such current and the earth;
+but it may be so slight with a single circuit as to not
+be detectable with present means, and the mutual gravitative
+effects between two such circuits would be
+obscured by their electro-magnetic effects.
+
+Lastly, if the atom itself be a vortex ring, as
+explained in the chapter on the ether, it follows that
+in the absence of such form of motion there would
+be no atom---no matter, though the substance out of
+which the ring was constituted would exist, but without
+any of the characteristics that we assign to matter
+\DPPageSep{365.png}{350}%
+\index{Laws not compulsory}%
+\index{Miracles possible}%
+\index{Phenomena, unexplained}%
+in any of its forms. If one chooses to call a common
+smoke-ring \emph{alpha}, evidently when the ring is dissipated
+there is no more ring, there is no alpha, it has been
+annihilated as a ring; and in like manner, one may
+understand that what constitutes an atom is not so
+much the substance it is composed of as the motion
+involved in it. Such \emph{an atom is a particular form of
+motion of the ether in the ether}, in the same sense
+as what is called light is a form of motion of the
+ether in the ether. One is an undulation, the other
+a vortex. One we call an ether wave, the other we
+call matter: both involve energy, and both have properties.
+Thus, one after another of the properties of
+matter are found to be resolvable into ether motions,
+ether being the primal substance, and matter only one
+of its manifestations.
+
+Such a conception of matter as is here presented,
+resolving as it does all its physical properties, even
+itself, into modes of motion of the ether in the ether,
+is not simply a new conception of matter, it is rather
+a revolution in fundamental conceptions, and if trustworthy,
+necessitates an abandonment of nearly every
+notion concerning them which men have entertained
+when thinking and discoursing upon the subject.
+The mystery of phenomena is not lessened but made
+greater by the discovery that everything which affects
+our senses in every degree is finally resolvable into a
+substance having physical properties so utterly unlike
+the properties of what we call matter, that it is a misuse
+of terms to call it matter.
+
+No one in the past has been able to forecast its
+\DPPageSep{366.png}{351}%
+\index{Electricity, origin of}%
+properties. The necessity for such a medium has not
+been felt by many philosophers, and though there has
+been some expectation on the part of a few, any new
+\index{of}%
+step has been a source of surprise. For instance, when
+Hertz succeeded in producing electro-magnetic waves
+in the ether only two or three feet long, it was heralded
+as being a demonstration of the existence of the
+ether, implying that all the phenomena of induction
+and electro-magnetic waves developed by machines
+vibrating up to four thousand per second in telephonic
+apparatus, could have some other interpretation. The
+point here emphasized is that the properties of the
+ether and their relations to such physical phenomena
+as have been the subjects of research are so little
+known, that no one has yet ventured to embody them
+in an all embracing philosophy, so as to deduce apparent
+phenomena from them.
+
+The significance of this will be apparent when one
+recalls the various attempts of materialistic philosophers
+to explain all sorts of phenomena as due to
+matter and its properties. Some of them have been
+ignorant of the existence of the ether; others have
+grouped matter and ether together and called both
+matter, and considered both as subject to the same
+laws as are found to hold true for matter as defined
+in this book. When it is apparent that such physical
+views are radically unsound, that one cannot reason
+from our perceptual matter to imperceptual ether,---for
+it is true that there are no known nerves that
+respond directly to ether action,---it will also be apparent
+that any scheme of things that ignores this knowledge
+\DPPageSep{367.png}{352}%
+or fails to make proper distinctions here cannot
+be entitled to respectful consideration. Indeed, such
+physical materialism is less rational than ever, for it
+ignores much knowledge now in our possession which
+is as certain as any we possess, and it ignores the
+trend of all the physical knowledge we have; for it
+cannot be denied that the advance in knowledge which
+has been so marked during the past half century has
+been in the discovery of the simplicity of relations,
+rather than towards ultimate explanation. It may
+truly be said that, in a philosophical sense, nothing
+has been explained. Familiarity with constant phenomenal
+relations induces in us expectations of certain
+happenings, and presently they seem obvious.
+The car moves because the engine pulls it; the engine
+moves because the steam pushes it; the steam
+pushes because the heat pushes it; and the heat
+pushes because---it is the nature of heat to do work.
+In that way, every physical phenomenon runs at last
+into an inexplicable, into an ether question; and the
+necessity for it follows from nothing we know or can
+assume. No one may assume for an instant that the
+possibilities of ether phenomena are limited by such
+interactions as have hitherto found expression in treatises
+on physics. Indeed, there is already a body of
+evidence which cannot safely be ignored, that physical
+phenomena sometimes take place when all the ordinary
+physical antecedents are absent, when bodies move
+without touch or electric or magnetic agencies,---movements
+which are orderly, and more or less subject to
+volition. In addition to this is still other evidence of
+\DPPageSep{368.png}{353}%
+\index{Postulates of Physical Science}%
+\Pagelabel{356}%
+competent critical observers that the subject-matter
+of thought is directly transferable from one mind to
+another. Such things are now well vouched for, and
+those who have not chanced to be a witness have no
+\textit{a~priori} right from physics or philosophy to deny such
+statements. Such facts do not in any way invalidate
+physical laws, nor make it needful to modify present
+statements concerning energy. Physical laws are not
+compulsory; they \emph{rule} nothing; they are but statements
+of our more or less uniform experience. If
+these things be true, they are of more importance to
+philosophy than the whole body of physical knowledge
+we now have, and of vast importance to humanity;
+for it gives to religion corroborative testimony of the
+real existence of possibilities for which it has always
+contended. The antecedent improbabilities of such
+occurrences as have been called miracles, which were
+very great because they were plainly incompatible
+with the commonly held theory of matter and its
+forces, have been removed, and their antecedent probabilities
+greatly strengthened by this new knowledge;
+and religion will soon be able to be aggressive with
+a new weapon.
+%\DPPageSep{369.png}{354}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XV}{Implications of Physical Phenomena}{354}
+
+\index{Fable, La Fontaine's}%
+
+A physical phenomenon is a phenomenon which
+involves energy. Every change of condition in matter
+is brought about by the action of energy upon it in one
+way or another. It may be gravitative energy or heat
+or light or electric or any other; but every physical
+change has a physical antecedent as well as a physical
+consequent, and the explanation of any given phenomenon
+consists in pointing out the precise antecedents that
+brought it about. There is a common saying that like
+causes produce like effects, but this is far from being
+true in the popular sense. If it were true the development
+of science would not be the difficult and painfully
+slow process it has proved to be. Electricity may be
+produced by turning a crank, by dissolving a metal, by
+twisting a wire, by splitting a crystal, and in others
+ways. The product is the same, but the antecedents
+are so different that no one can tell by examining the
+product how it was produced. If it became important
+to know what caused the electrical phenomenon, it
+would not be sufficient to know that electricity could
+be produced in these different ways; one would need
+to know the specific apparatus employed. The more
+\DPPageSep{370.png}{355}%
+complicated the phenomenon the more difficulty there
+is in unravelling it.
+
+So far as experiment and experience have led us, the
+antecedents of every physical phenomenon are themselves
+physical, and more than that, all reactions are
+quantitative, that is, the product is proportional to the
+antecedent, and this is sometimes embodied in what is
+called the doctrine of the Conservation of Energy
+which every one knows about.
+
+The exchange relations between the different forms
+of energy,---mechanical, thermal, chemical, electrical,
+etc., which are so well-known, being quantitative, are
+therefore mathematical. They have therefore become
+a corporate part of the body of knowledge, and are no
+longer subject to any questions as to their validity
+under any circumstances whatever. One who should
+challenge them would no more be deserving of attention
+than if he should offer to prove he could square a
+circle.
+
+The fundamental postulates of physical science are
+binding upon the one who understands them, for the
+same reason that the multiplication table is. There
+are no contingencies and no possibilities of hedging.
+If any one of them could be overthrown the whole
+body of science would go with it. This is said because
+there are not a few who appear to think that
+what is called physical science may not be so certain
+as its advocates think, and that there may be factors
+which have not yet been reckoned with that may quite
+transform the whole scheme. Science is a consistent
+body of relations, not simply a classified body of facts.
+\DPPageSep{371.png}{356}%
+\index{Blavatsky, Madam, pretensions of}%
+\index{Guppy, Mrs.}%
+\index{Power, needed for rapid movement in air}%
+These relations have been discovered by experiment,
+not by deduction.
+
+Some of them are the following:---
+
+ 1. Physical changes affect only the condition of
+matter, not its quantity. One cannot create or annihilate
+it, nor can one element be changed into
+another.
+
+ 2. Every atom is continually exchanging energy
+with every other atom, the rate of the exchange depending
+upon their difference in temperature.
+
+ 3. The different forms of energy are transformable
+into each other, but the quantity of energy is not
+altered by the transformation.
+
+ 4. Complex organic molecules differ from simpler
+inorganic molecules in possessing more energy. The
+differences in this respect are definite, may be measured
+in foot-pounds, and are practically enormous.
+
+5. Every physical change has a physical antecedent,
+is therefore mechanical, and is conditioned by the laws
+of energy.
+
+These principles are the outcome of modern investigation,
+the evidence for them is overwhelming, and
+a working knowledge of them needs to be a part of
+the mental equipment of every investigator, especially
+of the one who takes it as his province to explain
+phenomena.
+
+Science is strong here if it is anywhere; and any
+description of any event, any explanation of a genuine
+phenomenon that practically ignores these, cannot be
+true, and can have no claim to consideration.
+
+Before any explanation is needed there is always the
+\DPPageSep{372.png}{357}%
+\index{Sound, origin of}%
+\index{Spiritualistic theory}%
+\index{Spirit disembodied}%
+advisibility of ascertaining that the alleged event really
+happened, and whatever is not professedly miraculous
+must not be in discordance with the bast knowledge
+we have.
+
+With the above principles in hand one is prepared to
+fairly judge as to whether a given statement is credible
+or not. It is not necessary, as some seem to suppose,
+that one should be able to explain a phenomenon if he
+rejects the explanation of another one, or to assert with
+emphasis whether a thing is possible, probable, or
+impossible.
+
+In La Fontaine's fable the philosophers were at the
+theatre witnessing a play in which Ph{\oe}bus rose in the
+air and disappeared overhead. They undertook to explain
+the phenomenon. One says Ph{\oe}bus has an
+occult quality which carries him up. Another says
+he is composed of certain numbers that make him
+move upward. Another says Ph{\oe}bus has a longing
+for the top of the theatre, and is not easy till he gets
+there. Still another says Ph{\oe}bus has not a natural
+tendency to fly, but he prefers flying to leaving the
+top of the theatre empty. Lastly, a more modern
+philosopher thinks that Ph{\oe}bus goes up because he
+is pulled up by a weight that goes down behind the
+scenes. The last is an explanation. From a physical
+standpoint the others are not simply inadequate explanations,
+they are absolute nonsense. They make
+the antecedents of a phenomenon involving energy,
+factors that have no more relation to energy than has
+moonshine to metaphysics. Yet there has been a large
+number of men in all ages, men able in many ways
+\DPPageSep{373.png}{358}%
+too, who have ventured to explain phenomena in such
+a \emph{non-sequitur} way, and who have spurned the mechanical
+philosopher and his explanations.
+
+In that class of phenomena called spiritualistic there
+is a large body of reputed physical phenomena, vouched
+for by large numbers of witnesses, such as the movements
+of furniture, chairs, tables, books, pianos, etc.,
+the playing upon musical instruments, guitars, accordions,
+pianos, the appearance of lights, of faces, of
+full forms clothed, of conversations with materialized
+spirits, and so on, in great variety.
+
+I suppose no one doubts that to move a body of any
+magnitude requires the expenditure of energy, and to
+do a definite amount of work requires always the same
+amount of energy, yet I suspect there are many persons
+who give credence to statements of occurrences
+which practically deny the above proposition, thinking
+it to be probable that spiritual agencies may have
+control of powers that mankind knows nothing about.
+This may be true enough, but the question is not as to
+what this or that agency can do, but whether if spirits
+do a certain kind of work it takes less energy than if a
+man should do the same thing.
+
+Whenever a weight or a resistance and a velocity
+are given, it is always possible to compute the energy
+spent to produce or maintain it. Let us study a case
+or two. In olden times it was related that one of the
+prophets was carried through the air by the hair of his
+head from Babylon to Jerusalem. In later times it
+was said that Mrs.\ Guppy was similarly transported
+from Edinburgh to London. The distance is about $400$
+\DPPageSep{374.png}{359}%
+\index{Séances, phenomena at}%
+miles, and if I remember rightly she made the transit
+through the air in less than one hour. This makes the
+velocity to be about seven miles a minute or $600$ feet
+per second, which is three times faster than the highest
+tornado velocity. The resistance offered by the air
+to the movement of bodies in it is very well known.
+Pressure in hurricanes has been observed as high as $90$
+pounds per square foot, and as the pressure increases
+with the square of the velocity, it follows that at $600$
+feet per second the pressure per square foot would be
+about $800$ pounds; and if the exposed surface of Mrs.\
+Guppy was no more than six square feet, the total air
+pressure must have been not less than $4,800$ pounds.
+Now, the energy of this is found by multiplying the
+pressure by the velocity per second.
+\[
+4,800 \times 600 = 2,880,000\text{ foot-pounds,}
+\]
+and as a horse-power is equal to $550$ foot-pounds per
+second, it follows that it took not less than
+\[
+\dfrac{2,880,000}{550} = 5,236\text{ horse-power}
+\]
+to move Mrs.\ Guppy in that way at that rate.
+
+It was reported when Madam Blavatsky was living
+that she was in the habit of receiving letters from
+distant correspondents, brought to her by some occult
+agency and dropped upon her table. These letters
+were said to have been written only a few minutes
+before by persons living in the most distant parts of
+the earth.
+
+It takes but a little figuring to discover the amount
+of energy necessary to do a work of this kind. Thus,
+\DPPageSep{375.png}{360}%
+\index{Light, a sensation}%
+let the distance be $10,000$ miles, the time ten minutes.
+The pressure per square foot due to such a velocity in
+the air will be $17,000,000$ pounds, or $118,000$ pounds
+per square inch. Assume but one square inch as the
+area exposed to such a pressure, then the energy
+needed to transport it with the speed of $16.6$ miles
+per second, will be
+\[
+\dfrac{118,000 \times 5,280 \times 16.6}{550.} = 18,000,000\text{ horse-power.}
+\]
+
+Unless such packages were protected by occult
+agencies also, they would be burned up before they
+had gone the first mile of their journey.
+
+The popular idea is that at death the spirit leaves
+the body, but that it may, and often does, remain
+in the locality, and is frequently in the presence of
+its friends, unperceived by them, though occasionally
+they may be seen and communed with through the
+agency of certain preternaturally gifted persons called
+mediums.
+
+This proposition has so many physical data, and involves
+so many physical implications, it will be worth
+the while to look squarely at some of them.
+
+1. A spirit is supposed to be a conscious entity dissociated
+from matter, having ability to move at will and
+to be more or less interested in what is going on in the
+world, and capable of giving information on matters
+remote from observation or the knowledge of men.
+Suppose then such an entity, a disembodied spirit,
+without a corporeal body, but anxious to be in the
+neighborhood of its former friends. Seeing that it
+\DPPageSep{376.png}{361}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+now has, according to this view, no longer a hold upon
+matter, it has ceased to be in any way affected by
+gravity and inertia, for these are attributes of matter.
+Now the earth has a variety of motions in space; it
+turns on its axis, so that a point on the equator is
+moving at the rate of a thousand miles an hour. It revolves
+about the sun at the rate of nearly seventy thousand
+miles an hour, and with the sun and the rest of
+the bodies that make up the solar system it is drifting
+in space at the speed of sixty thousand miles an hour
+or more, so that the actual line drawn in space by any
+point upon the earth is a highly complex curve drawn
+at the rate of upwards of a hundred and twenty-five
+thousand miles in an hour. Now, any object whatever
+keeping up with the earth, but without the help of
+gravity, must maintain the velocity in space of not less
+than a hundred and twenty-five thousand miles an hour,
+and that is not all, as the movement is not in a straight
+line, any such object wishing to keep in a particular
+locality, say a room, would have to be on the alert constantly,
+for the earth wabbles\DPnote{** [sic]} for numerous reasons and
+what seems to us, who have bodies held by gravitation
+to the earth, as so quiet and smooth running that we
+are never conscious of the motion for an instant, is so
+simply because gravity takes care of us. Once surrender
+that and undertake to depend upon some supposed
+private source of energy, and one would instantly
+discover he had an engineering problem of a high degree
+of complexity. If one assumes, as some have
+done, that such spirit is composed of, or associated
+with, some sort of matter, and that navigation is accomplished
+\DPPageSep{377.png}{362}%
+\index{Materializations and energy}%
+by an act of the will, it will not change the
+foregoing factors in the problem at all.
+
+2. Suppose, as some have done, that disembodied
+spirits lose their hold upon matter, and that they do
+not remain at the earth. Then, if they remain at the
+point where separation from the body took place, in an
+hour the earth will have moved forward one hundred
+and twenty-five thousand miles. But over the earth
+there is certainly a death every minute all the time,
+and such are left in the rear by the earth never to return
+to them, for the movement of the earth is not a
+circuit, but an apparently endless drift. Think of the
+dead of the earth for the thousands of years since man
+has lived upon it! On this view, the spirits might be
+seen like the tail of a comet reaching backwards for
+millions on millions of miles,---the trail of the dead.
+
+In any view, time and space and energy cannot be
+ignored or ruled out.
+
+At \emph{séances} the reported phenomena are mostly of a
+physical sort, the trance of the medium being a physico-mental
+phenomenon. The phenomenon of sound implies
+the expenditure of energy, it is a vibratory motion
+of the air or other elastic body, and in order to produce
+it some antecedent force must be spent; it may be produced
+by mechanical means, or heat, or electricity, or
+by the muscles. Its production does not imply any
+specific method any more than articulate speech implies
+a person, as Faber's talking-machine and the
+phonograph prove.
+
+Let us consider some of the more subtle phenomena
+that are reported. First, as to so-called conditions.
+\DPPageSep{378.png}{363}%
+\index{Organic and inorganic matter, difference between}%
+One of the primal ones of these for such phenomena as
+the movements of bodies and materializations, is said
+to be darkness. This is of so much importance that it
+must be fully attended to. To one who has not paid
+any attention to what has been done in molecular
+science within the past fifteen or twenty years, the
+phenomena of light may and probably do seem to be
+due to an unique agency, as much as heat or electricity;
+and therefore he looks upon light as he looks
+upon the others in the hierarchy of the physical
+sciences, and expects that in its absence a potent
+agency or kind of energy is lacking. That this idea
+and conclusion is all wrong will be apparent when it is
+recognized that \emph{what we call} light is a particular sensation
+in the eye, and that to produce the sensation
+\emph{there is no one antecedent that is essential}. Press the
+eye with the finger in the darkest night and one will
+see a ring of light with great distinctness. An electric
+shock, a bump upon the head, will also give one the
+sensation of light, and in the absence of other aids to
+a judgment no one could tell what was the antecedent
+of a given light sensation.
+
+Radiations from a luminous body, and reflections
+from a non-luminous one, were not long ago thought to
+consist of three different kinds of rays,---heat, light, and
+actinic rays. It has been discovered that there is no
+such distinction in fact. What a ray will do depends
+upon what it falls upon. The same ray that falls upon
+the eye and produces the sensation of light, would heat
+another body, or do photographic work. The only
+difference in rays is in their longer or shorter wave
+\DPPageSep{379.png}{364}%
+\index{Immortality}%
+lengths, and the energy of a wave does not depend
+upon its length. From this it follows that there is no
+such thing as light as distinguished among forces or
+forms of energy. \emph{Light is a sensation}, and in the absence
+of eyes no such distinction could possibly be discovered.
+Light, then, as a particular kind of agency
+takes no part in phenomena outside of the eye. The
+eye of man is adapted to respond to certain wave
+lengths, the eyes of other animals are adapted to respond
+to other wave lengths; and if our eyes were
+adapted to perceive all wave lengths the whole universe
+would be always light about us, every object,
+whatever its temperature, could always be seen as
+easily as we now see when the sun shines.
+
+These facts make it quite impossible for a physicist
+to understand why darkness should be an essential
+condition for the occurrence of such phenomena as
+are described. Again, every ray of light when traced
+back leads to a vibrating molecule or atom. Indeed,
+light or ether waves in general all imply vibrating
+atoms or molecules; and what is called spectrum analysis
+is but a development of this fundamental principle,
+and not only the kind of matter, but its physical
+condition is revealed. If Moses had had a spectroscope
+when he saw the burning bush it might have
+told him the nature of that conflagration.
+
+So when luminous forms appear at a dark \textit{séance},
+there is first the ether waves of such length as to
+affect the eye; these traced to their source must
+arise from vibrating molecules, that is, matter expending
+energy in the production of ether waves;
+\DPPageSep{380.png}{365}%
+for no matter ever shines without some source of
+energy.
+
+If the matter that gives out the light be ordinary
+matter, there is no difficulty in understanding it; for
+matter can be made to shine in several ways,---by
+impact, by high temperature, by electric vibrations,
+by chemical reactions; and no one could tell from
+the simple fact that the matter shone, what the origin
+was. But it is said that these forms that are seen
+and thus affect the eye, that are touched and thus
+affect the sense of touch, that are warm and thus
+testify to vibrating molecules, that speak and appeal
+to the ear through air vibrations, are \emph{materializations};
+meaning by that that the body with its various organs
+and their functions is built up \textit{de novo} out of material
+at hand, as Adam was said to be made of the dust of
+the ground, and as the lion that pawed to free its
+hinder parts from the soil out of which it thus grew.
+What are the materials that make up a human body?
+Ultimately there are carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen,
+iron, phosphorous, sulphur, potassium, sodium, and
+several other ingredients of less importance. From a
+hundred to a hundred and fifty or more pounds of these
+are needed for one full-grown person.
+
+Many of the materializations that have been described,
+from Samuel the prophet to Katie King, have
+appeared to be veritable specimens of humanity even
+to avoirdupois and all that is implied in that. If the
+matter of such bodies was a creation and not a collocation,
+then one of the fundamental principles of
+physics is simply not true; for matter can be created
+\DPPageSep{381.png}{366}%
+\index{Seeing, what is implied in}%
+and annihilated by any spirit that knows how to find
+a suitable medium. If the material is gathered from
+the environment---and this sometimes is asserted---then
+the difficulty is nearly as great.
+
+One must take notice of the difference there is
+between inorganic or relatively simple chemical compounds
+and those that make up the bodies of living
+things,---the bones, the tissues, the muscles, the nerves,
+the brain, the blood. For building up a single pound
+of such tissue as muscle or of fat requires the expenditure
+of energy represented by about sixteen million
+foot-pounds; and as in such a body as we are supposing
+there could hardly be less than twenty-five or thirty
+to be so reckoned, it follows that not less than four
+hundred million foot-pounds of energy is necessary, a
+quantity equal to upwards of twelve thousand horsepower,
+if done in a minute; and if done in half a
+minute, then twice that quantity. I cannot but wonder
+if those who think they have witnessed such phenomena
+could have been conscious of the stupendous
+amount of energy which was being evolved before their
+eyes. Then dematerialization involves the annihilation
+of the same amount; for it is to be remembered that
+organic matter differs from inorganic in the amount of
+energy absorbed. There has been either the creation
+and annihilation of matter or the creation and annihilation
+of an enormous amount of energy, without antecedents
+and with no residuals. This is not saying that
+such events have not taken place, it only points out the
+factors of energy which are implied if they do happen.
+
+One who is unaware of such implications and phenomena
+\DPPageSep{382.png}{367}%
+\index{Hearing, what is implied in}%
+may easily suppose the most improbable things
+can take place. Those who are aware of such implications
+cannot hear of such events without instantly perceiving
+how almost infinitely improbable they are.
+
+Reports of such phenomena have never come from
+any man who understood the relations of phenomena.
+
+Scientific men have been often told of their incompetency
+to investigate so-called psychical phenomena;
+but if the latter involve physical phenomena, then who
+else can properly investigate them?
+
+This paper is not to be understood as implying that
+there is no relation between the living and the dead,
+for the writer does not believe that doctrine; instead
+of that he thinks we are very near to a discovery of a
+physical basis for immortality that will transform most
+all our thinking. If spiritual communication is not
+accompanied with physical phenomena in the alleged
+way, it does not follow that it may not happen in other
+ways that do not do such violence to our fundamental
+knowledge as most of the reported cases do. The universe
+is large, not much of it has been explored. We
+live and move and have our being in an environment
+about which our knowledge is most meagre; but our
+knowledge of energy we get not only from the earth,
+but from the sun and most distant stars and nebulæ,
+and it is not probable that any contribution whatever
+will materially modify our present knowledge of it.
+
+Thus far I have considered what is always implied
+when physical phenomena are considered, especially
+with reference to the antecedents; for instance, when
+a steam-engine is run it implies the consumption of
+\DPPageSep{383.png}{368}%
+\index{Senses}%
+fuel, which in turn implies molecular structure, and a
+definite amount of energy in what is called its chemical
+form. That energy is not created or destroyed by
+any physical process, and, therefore, every exhibition of
+energy, no matter where or when, is to be explained
+solely by reference to the laws of energy which are
+now so well known as to have passed out of the region
+of conjecture or hypothesis. If there be any knowledge
+which man possesses, which for certainty and
+accuracy compares with mathematical knowledge, it is
+the knowledge of physical relations. I traced out a
+few cases in which the alleged phenomena were of
+such a physical sort as to be easily handled, and
+showed how one must look at their antecedents. That
+such phenomena did take place was not denied. It
+was simply asserted that when they did happen one
+must reckon with the implications, unless he was prepared
+to affirm that physical phenomena might happen
+when physical laws are ignored and quite counted out.
+There are yet some further implications it is well to
+consider. They have to do with the objective structure
+and qualities of the spiritual beings that are
+supposed to bring about the phenomena we are considering,
+such as moving objects, playing upon musical
+instruments, writing upon slates, and so on.
+
+As such beings are always addressed as if they were
+visible personages, possessing the same organs of hearing,
+seeing, and so on, as are possessed by individuals
+still having a material body; and as the replies to questions
+never contradict such assumptions, but, on the
+contrary, are confirmatory of such assumptions, it follows
+\DPPageSep{384.png}{369}%
+that one may properly consider what really is
+implied in the assumption that spirits have eyes and
+ears, because they can see and hear. When I say \emph{I
+see}, I assert not only the existence of what we call
+light, but the existence of an organ called the eye, the
+structure of which is adapted to be acted upon by what
+we call light. Light is, as we all know, a wave-motion
+in the ether. It travels at the great velocity of a hundred
+and eighty-six thousand miles in a second, and the
+waves are in the neighborhood of only the one fifty-thousandth
+of an inch long. The eye is the only
+structure in the body that can perceive these waves.
+It is a kind of camera, and photographic work goes on
+in the retina very much as it does in the process of
+photography. Then, there is the optic nerve, which is
+an essential part of the apparatus, and conveys to the
+seat of consciousness the impress of the molecular
+disturbances which have taken place in the eye. No
+one is conscious of the phenomenon of light except
+through the action of this complex mechanism. Therefore,
+when one says he \emph{sees}, he means that a particular
+kind of disturbance has taken place in a particular physiological
+structure. The term sight is never used in a
+different sense from this, except when it is avowedly
+used figuratively. In the absence of ether waves there
+could no more be what we call sight than if there were
+no eyes; both are essential.
+
+When, then, it is said or admitted that a spirit \emph{sees},
+not in a figurative sense, but in the sense in which we
+all use the term, it is implied that a spirit has eyes, a
+physiological structure, acted upon by ether waves, and
+\DPPageSep{385.png}{370}%
+\index{Law, physical}%
+\index{Specialists}%
+the nervous system behind that. It has what \emph{we} call
+eyes. It will not do at all to say that such spirit has
+an equivalent sense, for whatever that might be it
+would certainly not be \emph{sight}. One may get a very
+accurate knowledge of the presence of another person
+by the voice, or by the sense of touch, but it
+would be a culpable misuse of language to say of such
+person that he was \emph{seen}. Sound can no more affect
+the eyes than light can affect the ears. This, then, is
+the same as saying that a spirit has a physical structure
+for seeing similarly constituted to that in man,
+and, indeed, in all organizations that \emph{see}.
+
+When I say \emph{I hear}, I mean that air vibrations have
+affected my organs of hearing, the ears with the nervous
+structure between the ear and the seat of consciousness.
+There is implied in the statement not
+only that sound vibrations of a definite sort have been
+produced and are acting, but that they are acting upon
+a certain physiological structure adapted to be affected
+by gaseous vibrations. Vibrations in the ether cannot
+affect the organ of hearing. The media are radically
+different, and cannot be used as substitutes for each
+other; and it is therefore wrong to say \emph{I hear}, unless
+what I perceive reaches my consciousness through the
+physiological mechanism called the auditory apparatus.
+In a figurative sense one may say he hears as he may
+say he sees.
+\begin{verse}
+ \small
+ ``Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutored mind \\
+ \PadTo{``}{}Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.''
+\end{verse}
+
+But real seeing and real hearing imply certain distinct
+\DPPageSep{386.png}{371}%
+organs adapted to different physical conditions.
+One cannot, by talking, affect one's eyes; nor will
+light waves, as such, affect one's ears.
+
+Suppose, then, in a \textit{séance}, when a spirit is addressed
+thus: Will the spirit please rap upon the table? and
+the answer comes at once,---a rap distinctly heard. The
+question was an oral one, and was produced by physical
+means, regular sound vibrations, and can be heard
+by such beings as are possessed of the proper organs
+to be acted upon by air vibrations, that is, ears; and
+by ears I \emph{mean} ears, not substitutes of any sort. What
+we call \emph{speech} is absolutely impossible in a vacuum,
+as much as is sound, for speech is a succession of
+sounds. There are numerous substitutes for speech,---signs
+made with the fingers or lips that do not appeal
+to the ear; but these are not speech. If, then, spirits
+\emph{hear}, it is because they have ears, organs that can be
+affected by sound vibrations in the same manner as we,
+the so-called living beings, can be. Moreover, do not
+all testify that they can and do both see and hear?
+
+In like manner one may treat of the sense of feeling,
+or any other sense. All imply a molecular structure, a
+nervous organization, indeed, everything that goes to
+make up a consciousness of the external world such as
+is possessed by living beings governed by physical
+laws.
+
+It is clear that what we call pain is immediately due
+to disordered nervous structure, and in the absence of
+nerves could never be known. This can be tested in a
+minute by any one, by simply pricking one's finger.
+Does not the destruction of the nervous tissue in any
+\DPPageSep{387.png}{372}%
+manner end the possibility of pain? Can a spirit
+then suffer physical pain without a nervous organization?
+By pain I mean what all mean by the
+term, the sensation which, if severe and long-continued,
+results fatally to the sufferer, because the
+nervous tissue is itself destroyed.
+
+If some one having read so far, perhaps with impatience,
+should say, ``All this may be as you say for living
+beings, incorporated in a body of flesh and blood
+and a nervous system, but we are not to suppose for
+a moment that spirits are thus constituted, and if not,
+then they are not to be supposed to be conditioned by
+such physical laws as all common matter is conditioned
+by. They have their own constitution, different enough
+from ours, and one cannot reason from our condition to
+theirs.'' To this I would reply, that if one cannot do
+this, if a physicist must not carry his terms and conceptions
+into this spiritual domain, for precisely the
+same reason the spiritualist must not talk about a spirit
+\emph{seeing}, \emph{hearing}, \emph{feeling}, and so on, unless he admits he
+is talking loosely, and means by those terms only to
+symbolize his conceptions, and has to employ such
+terms as best convey the idea, which idea cannot be
+physically true. Even then it is very difficult to understand
+why, if the physical terminology is inappropriate,
+any one should at a \textit{séance} ask such a question aloud as,
+If John be present will he please rap on the table; for
+this is \emph{sound} addressed to an ear---both of which are
+purely physical things.
+
+An Arab may not have any difficulty in imagining a
+genie that may be summoned by rubbing a cup, to do
+\DPPageSep{388.png}{373}%
+wonderful things, and then vanish out of relations to
+everything; but no one who has studied deeply into
+the significance of physical relations can possibly admit
+that affairs in nature go on in such a fast-and-loose
+way.
+
+Thus far I have considered such relations of physical
+phenomena as have been found by experience to hold
+good in the whole range of physics---such relations as
+properly come under the domain of what is called law,
+and by law I mean mathematical precision, both in the
+antecedents and the results. With the exception of
+the original apparition of matter and of physical energy,
+there has not been found in the whole field of physics,
+by any investigator of any nationality, any kind of a
+phenomenon which is believed to be unexplainable on
+the basis of the knowledge of physical science we
+already possess. Of course, what we call explanation
+is merely presenting the antecedent factors of a given
+occurrence, both in quality and quantity, and a thing is
+fully explained when these are given so fully as to leave
+no reasonable doubt as to their sufficiency in the mind
+of one who is properly well acquainted with the data;
+but the data that enter into a given phenomenon are
+the very things most persons know least about; and a
+given explanation may be full and adequate, and yet, to
+some, seem to be wholly insufficient.
+
+In these days one often hears about \emph{specialists}---of
+their limited knowledge and inadequate preparation for
+giving a judgment in other fields than their own. So it
+has come to be reckoned that if a man has, by study
+and investigation in a given field, made himself a competent
+\DPPageSep{389.png}{374}%
+judge, so as to be considered an authority in
+that field, he is by so much less fitted to be heard in
+the settlement of some question foreign to that field;
+whereas some other man who is not known to have
+done anything in any field, may be called in for judgment,
+to the exclusion of the former, lest his increased
+knowledge in some one department should disqualify
+him elsewhere.
+
+Do we not hear that biologists are incompetent
+judges of mental phenomena, that astronomers are not
+competent in biological questions, and so on? If this
+distinction be true to the extent generally assumed,
+then philosophy itself is impossible; for if a man's
+opinion can be good only in a small department of
+knowledge, and he cannot adequately master more, how
+shall we ever know the relationships that constitute
+philosophy? The truth is, this is a one-sided affair
+altogether, and holds true from but one standpoint. If
+an astronomer propounds a chemical theory of the sun,
+will it be needful in any degree that the chemist who
+reviews the work shall have even studied astronomy
+or paid the slightest attention to telescopes or solar
+affairs? If chemical science is involved, it is for the
+chemist to say whether what is propounded is adequate
+or not. That is to say, the man who concerns himself
+with the constitution of the sun must so far be a
+chemist, but a man may be a chemist and never concern
+himself about the sun.
+
+Again, if a biologist who is admittedly ignorant of
+chemical and physical science makes statements that
+plainly contradict the laws of energy as determined in
+\DPPageSep{390.png}{375}%
+\index{Science, no one independent}%
+chemistry and physics, and if a physicist challenges the
+statements, shall the latter be silenced by calling him a
+specialist who may be competent enough in his own
+field, but who knows nothing of biology? Or shall he
+be told that physical laws may be rigorous enough in
+one mass of matter, but not in another? Is it to be
+believed that physical laws thus play fast and loose?
+Here the arithmetic holds good, but there all is indefinite,
+and would not this be a fine example of dictation
+out of one's field? Physiologists tell us that ultimately
+every physiological problem reduces itself to one of
+chemistry and physics.\footnote
+ {See Appendix, \Pageref{p.}{400}.}
+If this be so, is it not plain
+that the one who treats broadly of biological problems
+must either be a physicist or submit his work to the
+criticism of a physicist? But a man may be a physicist
+and never trouble himself about biological questions.
+
+If a social philosopher presents a scheme for ameliorating
+the evils present in society, in which scheme he
+plainly ignores the laws of life as determined by biologists,---as
+if such laws were not the very determining
+factors which must first be reckoned with,---shall not
+the biologist condemn such work? and shall he, too, be
+told that however much he knows of biology, he is incompetent
+in sociology? Plainly, not so. But is this
+process a reversible one? Can the sociologist criticise
+the biologist's work unless he be himself a biologist, or
+the biologist criticise the chemist's or physicist's work
+unless he be so far a chemist or physicist? He certainly
+cannot; and this shows that there is a certain
+relationship among these subjects in which there is an
+\DPPageSep{391.png}{376}%
+\index{Séances, phenomena at}%
+order of dependence. In order to fully understand and
+explain a sociological problem, a knowledge of psychology
+is essential; a working knowledge of biology,
+or the laws of life, and no adequate knowledge of this
+can be had without a preparation in chemistry and
+physics.
+
+In this there is nothing new, but it is generally
+ignored by most persons who treat on broad questions.
+It is plain that every kind of a question is, in the last
+analysis, referable to the laws of physical phenomena,
+and from these there is no appeal. There are not
+many who like this, it is true; but the test for truth
+is not what one likes or dislikes, but whether the
+proposition is in accordance with the best and most
+fundamental knowledge we have. Some of those fundamental
+truths discovered within the past fifty years,
+and not questioned by any one who can stand an
+examination on them, were given on \Pageref{page}{356}; and
+whoever sees, or thinks he sees, a phenomenon which
+he interprets in a way which plainly contradicts or
+ignores those laws, does not so much have a contention
+with any man as with science itself. If those laws are
+not irrefragably true, then we have no science at all,
+no philosophy, knowledge is scrappy, and what we call
+the interdependence of phenomena is a myth.
+
+Some of the phenomena alleged to happen at spiritual
+\textit{séances}, such as levitation of human bodies, writing between
+closed slates, the moving of matter without contact,
+and so forth, are said to be as thoroughly proved
+as any of the facts of the fundamental knowledge I
+have treated. Such a statement cannot have come
+\DPPageSep{392.png}{377}%
+from any one who knows how the knowledge I spoke
+of was obtained, or how it may be verified by anybody
+who cares to take the pains. None of it depends in
+any degree upon anybody's dictum. If any one has
+doubts as to the constitution of water, he can determine
+it himself in half a dozen different ways. If
+he doubts that the earth is eight thousand miles in
+diameter, he can measure it in several ways. If he
+thinks a pound of coal does not have eleven million
+foot-pounds of energy, he can himself try it and be satisfied.
+Any one can satisfy himself by himself; assistance
+of others is only a convenience, not a necessity,
+and the fundamental statements are now believed by
+so many because so many have tested them, and all
+have reached the same conclusion. Furthermore, great
+commercial enterprises are founded upon some of them,
+as when so much limestone and coal are mixed with a
+given ore of iron for its reduction. So if such alleged
+facts be true, it cannot be true they are as thoroughly
+proved as the ones I stated, and they will not be so
+proved until each one can be verified in like manner.
+
+There is another excellent reason for denying that
+they are proved in any scientific sense. All physical
+phenomena, so far as they have become a part of physical
+science, have been examined and reported upon by
+physicists; and both phenomena and their interpretation
+have been the subject of remorseless criticism,
+and have been adopted, if at all, on \emph{compulsion}; their
+acceptance has been a matter of last resort. This is
+true in all departments. Why should one believe that
+the world turns round unless there is no other possible
+\DPPageSep{393.png}{378}%
+\index{Growth of crystals}%
+way to explain and account for all the facts which must
+be reckoned with in any explanation? The theory itself
+is so remote from the common experience of mankind
+that nobody suspected it for thousands of years, and it
+is not at all obvious to one who is not acquainted with
+phenomena out of the range of ordinary experience.
+The form of the earth, the aberration of light, the
+apparent change of latitude, and so forth, have to be
+considered even more than the recurrence of day and
+night. For most of the purposes of life it does not
+matter whether it turns round or not, and most men
+have no interest in the question further than that it
+accords or not with their other beliefs and feelings.
+But the answer to the question, ``Does it turn?'' is
+not one that can be settled by submitting it to the vote
+of the world. The judgment of one Galileo is worth
+more than that of all the rest of the world on that
+point. Once admit that no department of science is
+independent of other departments, and that no phenomenon
+occurs independent of relations which must
+be satisfied by any attempted explanation, and it follows
+that no explanation of an event should be adopted
+and be considered a part of science, unless it is shown
+to be in agreement with what is known. Hence, if an
+event is reported which appears to be out of relation
+with those established relations which there is general
+agreement upon, there is the best of reasons for thinking
+that either the event did not happen, or that it did
+not happen as reported, especially if the one reporting
+it is unacquainted with the variety of ways in which it
+is possible to do the same thing. If one sees a wheel
+\DPPageSep{394.png}{379}%
+\index{Physicists, prepossessions}%
+turning round but does not see its connections, how can
+he tell whether it is turned by muscular action or water-power
+or wind-power or gravity or heat or electricity
+or magnetism, every one of which is capable of turning
+a wheel? Even if he can see the connections, he cannot
+always tell what makes the wheel go without further
+investigation. Air and steam will make a water motor
+go as well as water itself, and the presence of electrical
+devices would not insure that the wheel was turned by
+electricity, and the absence of such electrical devices
+would not insure that it was not driven by electrical
+agency. Hence the testimony of witnesses only, even
+though they were otherwise competent, would be of
+little weight in deciding what made the wheel go. If
+the question were one of any importance it could be
+determined only by a competent investigator with
+proper appliances, and unhindered by restrictions of
+any sort. One cannot trust his sense of sight implicitly.
+Many persons have lost fingers because the
+buzz saw looked as if it was still; and it is easy with
+the zoetrope, and in other ways, to produce the impression
+of movements that are not taking place; so it
+might be that after all the wheel was not turning, or
+even that there was no wheel at all.
+
+Admitting, for the argument's sake, that the alleged
+phenomena at \textit{séances} are real occurrences and must
+be accounted for, there are certainly three different
+possible ways:---
+
+1. By more or less skilfully devised tricks, and fraudulent
+only in the attempt to make others believe they
+are not tricks. To be certain they are not the results
+\DPPageSep{395.png}{380}%
+of manipulative skill on the part of some one, only a
+skilful juggler might be able to find out. It is known
+that hundreds have been thus imposed upon; and skilful
+jugglers, such as Hermann and Maskaline, who have
+investigated many such, declare themselves satisfied
+that the whole of it is trickery.
+
+2. Suppose some of the surprising things done are
+not the results of conscious duplicity, then it may be,
+as most interested persons contend, the work of disembodied
+spirits who, through the agency of mediums,
+do apparently the most absurd and irrational things,
+but are never willing or able to do the simplest reasonable
+thing to satisfy a competent judge; who mutter no
+end of maudlin rubbish, add nothing of wisdom or
+knowledge to mankind, and justify Professor Huxley
+in saying that if such is the state of the dead we have
+another good reason against suicide.
+
+3. There are a small number who think some of the
+\emph{phenomena} to be genuine, but who attribute them not
+to spirits, but to some obscure physical force not yet
+understood, and but little investigated. This is the
+attitude of Professor Crookes, and of the Milan experimenters.
+
+As to the class that is satisfied with the spiritistic
+interpretation, it may be remarked that such an explanation
+is in accordance with the attempts of the race
+to give a rational explanation of all kinds of phenomena.
+In the absence of proper knowledge, what
+seems simpler or more natural than to assume some intelligent
+agency as the cause of any obscure event?
+This it was that peopled the mountains, glens, trees,
+\DPPageSep{396.png}{381}%
+\index{Knowledge, rapid growth of}%
+and rivers with unseen beings, watchful and interested
+in the affairs of men. The more ignorant, the closer
+was the fetich; the more enlightened, the higher these
+agencies retreated into the sky, useful now chiefly for
+literary and artistic purposes. For some reason it has
+always been discreditable to be without some theory
+for all sorts of occurrences, and even to-day, in the
+most enlightened communities, a man is liable to be
+denounced for his stupidity or his cowardice if he says,
+about some matters, I don't know. It is said, however,
+that some of the phenomena at \textit{séances} bear the marks
+of intelligence such as do not belong to natural occurrences,
+and that it is a fair inference that other minds
+than the witnesses are present. When Kepler discovered
+that the planets moved in elliptical orbits
+instead of circular ones as had been supposed, he felt
+bound to give some reasonable explanation of the facts.
+He knew of nothing but intelligence that could maintain
+such motions, and he therefore supposed that each
+planet must have some guiding spirit. When the law
+of gravitation was applied, it was found that a circular
+orbit was the only unstable orbit in the system, and
+that gravity alone was sufficient to account for the
+order, the harmony, and all the variety of motions; so
+the spirits were dismissed from further duty. When a
+spider has a leg grow to replace one that has been lost,
+it has been held to be due to intelligent action superior
+to ordinary chemical and physical action. When a
+crystal of quartz is seen to replace a part accidentally
+lost, so as to complete its symmetry before it begins to
+grow elsewhere, it appears as if mind was at work here
+\DPPageSep{397.png}{382}%
+quite as much as in the other case, only in the latter most
+persons are content not to follow the implications, for
+they quickly see the philosophical rocks ahead. The
+real truth is that the further one pursues the causes
+of phenomena the more clearly does it appear unlikely
+that disembodied intelligence is behind any particular
+phenomena.
+
+Among all those who make up the great class of
+believers in the spiritualistic theory of physical phenomena,
+there is not a single physicist; that is, not one
+to whom one would go for an explanation of any complicated
+physical process. It is assumed that he is no
+better qualified to investigate \textit{séance} phenomena than
+others who do not know what to expect and look out
+for in simpler cases, and that he is unreasonable if he
+does not accept the statements of untrained observers
+as being as good as his own observations.
+
+It is true that he has some prepossessions. He does
+not believe the multiplication table should be trifled
+with. He knows that most things may be done in
+many different ways, independent of appearances. He
+knows a man may sometimes not perceive what is
+plainly before his eyes, simply because he was not
+looking for it. He deems it right to exhaust the
+possibilities of the known before summoning some
+unknown and hypothetical factors in any given case.
+He knows it to be well-nigh impossible for a man to
+give an entirely accurate account to-day of what occurred
+yesterday. He knows that a photograph is a
+better witness of an event, and that a stenographic
+report of statements made is more reliable than any
+\DPPageSep{398.png}{383}%
+\index{Miracle defined}%
+man's memory. He knows that the interpretations of
+events by mankind have never been true interpretations,
+and that the general beliefs of mankind have
+never been confirmed by science in any particular, and
+that, so far as anything has been settled, it has been
+decided against the opinions and judgment of mankind
+and its leaders. He is aware that his key has unlocked
+every one of the doors in Doubting Castle that have
+been unlocked, and therefore he believes that the
+implications of physical science as a whole are against
+any generally received interpretation of any event that
+has not been subjected to its scrutiny.
+%\DPPageSep{399.png}{384}%
+
+
+\Chapter[The Relations of Physical and Psychical Phenomena]%
+{XVI}{The Relations of Physical and Psychical
+Phenomena\protect\footnotemark}{384}
+
+\footnotetext{Read before the Psychical Congress, Chicago, August, 1893.}%
+
+% Set manually
+\SetRunningHeads{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}{Physical and Psychical Phenomena}%
+
+\First{Knowledge} has grown apace within the past fifty
+years. It is generally admitted that more has been
+acquired in this time than in all the preceding centuries.
+Furthermore, the knowledge thus acquired has
+not been simply an addition to the mental possessions
+of former days; it has instead been of such a kind as
+to completely overthrow nearly all former notions of
+nature and its mode of operations, and the new product
+can hardly be allowed to be an outcome of the work of
+earlier men. It is in the nature of a catastrophe where
+old continents have sunk and new ones have arisen
+from old ocean beds.
+
+This generation lives in a new world, with new environments,
+new ideas, new explanations, new philosophy,
+new ideals, and new beliefs. We have new astronomy,
+new chemistry, new physics, new psychology, new natural
+history, and everybody is on the \textit{qui vive} to know
+what can possibly come next. This does not mean
+that nature goes on in a different way from what it had
+hitherto done, but that we have mentally grasped a new
+\DPPageSep{400.png}{385}%
+\index{Mental processes imply physical conditions}%
+and transforming idea. We have reached an elevation
+from which it is possible to survey a broader field, and
+can interpret phenomena better because their relations
+are better perceived, and because of this it is seen that
+the old interpretations were all wrong, and, indeed,
+were worthless, because not true. While all this is
+granted readily by most thoughtful persons, there are
+not a few who recognize the changed opinions in the
+various sciences and philosophy in general, who are not
+at all persuaded but what the present philosophy of
+things, which is dubbed evolution, is only a passing
+phase and may itself presently give way to some
+new and possibly truer conceptions, being content to
+be mildly agnostic on such matters, and willing to wait
+with patience for more light. There are some who
+think the new philosophy does not take account of all
+the known factors, if, by chance, there may not be
+unknown factors of as much or more importance than
+any which have been included, and which a final philosophy
+of things will certainly include; and such object
+strenuously to the limitations which the current philosophy
+seems to set to knowledge and to the ideals
+of the race.
+
+The man of science hears rumors of phenomena
+which are said to be as certain as any in his own field,
+which he has never investigated, and which cannot
+come into his category of related things. Some of
+these reported happenings are as marvellous as any
+miracles that have been recorded. Persons of undoubted
+probity have reported phenomena taking place
+in their presence which, if true, give credence to many
+\DPPageSep{401.png}{386}%
+things for which in the past men and women have been
+burned to death as wizards and witches. Thus, I have
+an acquaintance, an eminent man not given to romancing,
+who assures me he has seen, in undimmed light, a
+chair ten feet from any person rise as if some one had
+hold of its back and come and set itself down by his
+side. Something of the same kind is said to have taken
+place in the Milan experiments of last fall. Mr.\
+William Crookes tells us that the weight of a body has
+been changed to be more or less according to an effort
+of the will of Mr.\ Home, and likewise in Milan the
+weight of the medium varied as much as fifty pounds.
+
+Now, there have been numerous attempts to define a
+miracle for the purposes of philosophy, and usually it
+is not the thing accomplished so much as the means
+adopted for doing it. The antecedents of the event
+are supposed to be other than the usual ones which
+might do the same thing. Thus, a chair may be moved
+by a person who lifts it and carries it to a new place;
+but the chair may be pushed by a stick or pulled by a
+string to a new place, while no one touched it, and all
+who have been to see Hermann, and other magicians,
+have seen things move about in a surprising manner
+when no one touched them. In such cases it is
+believed that none but well-known means are skilfully
+used to produce such displacements, and that any one
+might learn the art if it were worth his while. In other
+words, no one thinks he is looking at a miraculous
+event at a magician's show, no matter how surprising
+the thing done; but if any person should be able to
+make a chair, or an object, move from one place to
+\DPPageSep{402.png}{387}%
+\index{Consciousness implies energy}%
+\index{Mind and energy}%
+another without the mechanical adjuncts of some sort
+which are needed by others, by an act of will rather
+than by the employment of what we call energy, such
+a person is able to work what has always been called a
+``miracle.'' His method of doing that thing is a super-natural\DPnote{** Only instance.}
+method, which is not the gift of every one even
+in the slightest degree; for any one can try and satisfy
+himself as to whether he can, by any simple act of will,
+make the tiniest mote in a sunbeam or the most delicately
+poised needle move in the slightest degree.
+This is the common experience; and because it has
+been found by experience that matter never moves
+except when some other body has previously acted
+upon it with a push or a pull, it has come about that
+we have reduced the experience to the statements
+embodied in so-called laws of motion, have found them
+to be justified and without any exception so far as
+investigation has gone, and this, too, by a multitude of
+persons for two hundred years. As modern science
+rests upon a mechanical basis, as it is concerned altogether
+with the phenomena of matter and the relations
+of the phenomena, and as these have been found in
+every case that has been fully investigated to conform
+to mathematical laws rigorously, not partly or dubiously,
+is it not much more probable that any other phenomenon,
+no matter what, that involves matter and its
+changes, does conform strictly to the general laws,
+than that these laws are sometimes inoperative?
+
+Probably the whole thing resolves itself into this:
+Are the fundamental properties of matter variable?
+Some of the phenomena alleged to happen at \textit{séances}
+\DPPageSep{403.png}{388}%
+imply that they are. How strong the case is against
+such assumption, I think is not perceived by many persons
+who give credence to the happenings, but who are
+not well equipped with physical knowledge. Many persons
+seem willing enough to admit physical laws and
+physical processes in what they take to be the field of
+physics, but they hold that there are other fields just as
+certain, and among such, mind, that controls matter and
+its forces, and to which it is not necessarily subject;
+that it is perfectly philosophical to think that mind may
+exist independent of matter and its relations, and be
+able in this condition to control phenomena.
+
+Let us examine this. Assume that every physical
+process in the world should be suddenly stopped, so
+there should be no change. That would mean that all
+motions were stopped. There would at once be neither
+day nor night, for these are due to the earth's rotation;
+no light, for light is a wave motion; there would
+be no heat, for heat is a vibratory motion; there
+would be no chemical changes, for they depend upon
+heat; there would be neither solid nor liquid nor
+gas, for each depends upon conditions of temperature,
+that is, of heat, which is assumed to be absent; there
+would be no sight, for that implies wave motions; nor
+sound, for that implies air waves; nor taste, for that
+implies chemical action; nor smell, for like reason; nor
+touch, for that implies pressure---the result of motion.
+The heart would cease to beat, the blood to flow, and
+consciousness would be stopped. Every one of the
+senses would be obliterated or annihilated; nothing
+would happen, because there would be no change anywhere.
+\DPPageSep{404.png}{389}%
+Every phenomenon in the world of sensation
+would be stopped, because every phenomenon in the
+physical world had stopped; which is the same as saying
+that all we call sensations are absolutely dependent
+upon physical changes, going on all the time independent
+of our will or choice, and which cannot be controlled
+in the slightest degree by anybody. Every
+phenomenon of every kind, then, consists in, as well
+as is dependent upon, matter and its motion, and there
+is in the whole range of experience no example of any
+kind of a phenomenon where matter, ordinary matter,
+is not the conditioning factor. There is no known case
+where force or energy is changed in degree or direction
+or kind but through the agency of matter. Every kind
+of a change implies matter that has thus acted. What
+is called the correlation of forces means that one kind
+is convertible into some other kind of energy, as heat
+into mechanical energy in the steam engine. But the
+engine, a material structure, is essential for the change.
+What is called the conservation of energy means that
+in all the exchanges energy may undergo, as heat into
+light, or work of any kind, the quantity of it does not
+vary. The matter, as such, does not add to, or subtract
+from it; hence only a material body can possess energy,
+and a second material structure is necessary in order
+that the energy of the first should be changed into any
+other form. So it appears there must be at least two
+bodies before anything can possibly happen.
+
+This all means that what we call energy is embodied
+only in matter, and that what we call phenomena is but
+the exchange of energy between different masses of
+\DPPageSep{405.png}{390}%
+\index{Mind and matter}%
+matter; also that these exchanges take place with
+mathematical precision, else prediction would be impossible,
+and computation a waste of time.
+
+Now, assume that the physical structure of an individual
+was kept intact, and that every atom and molecule
+in the body maintained its relative position after all
+motions had ceased. Assume, too, that the mind or
+soul, or whatever one chooses to call the conscious
+individuality, was present and capable as ever of acting
+upon the material structure; can a single atom be
+moved in the slightest degree? If any be moved, then
+energy has been expended, energy which must have existed
+elsewhere or have been created \textit{de novo}. For conscious
+perception, whether sight or sound or any other,
+motions embodying energy are essential, as pointed out;
+and hence, to produce any perception, some motions
+would necessarily have to be initiated, and to initiate
+them energy from some source must be supplied.
+All the energy the matter had has been destroyed
+according to the assumption; so, if any movement has
+begun, it must have been created or produced from some
+other unthinkable condition which was not energy, in
+some such sense as matter is supposed to have been
+created, in which something is made out of nothing.
+The demand is for creative power. Admit for the
+argument's sake that it is done, and matter begins to
+move in any kind of a way; so far it possesses energy,
+physical energy as embodied in matter. Call the
+amount of it ``A.'' Now, if the original condition of
+things was established, so far as the amount of energy
+was concerned, which may be called ``B,'' then the
+\DPPageSep{406.png}{391}%
+\index{Phenomena, unexplained}%
+\index{Psychics}%
+whole amount of energy is ``A plus B.'' It will make
+no difference in this sum if one supposes that the
+original motions and energy were not interrupted; for
+if, on account of mind action, any particle moves more
+or less than it would have done with its original supply,
+then something has been added to the store of energy
+in matter, and what is called the conservation of energy
+is not true.
+
+Until all phenomena have been examined, there will be
+obscure happenings and things to be explained by some
+one who can; but it is no final explanation of anything
+to say, ``A man did it,'' or ``An intelligence did it.''
+What kind of changes, that is, what kind of phenomena,
+the forms of energy we are now acquainted with are
+capable of producing no one can now limit, certainly
+not one who has not been to the pains to understand
+how the simple ones take place. I have often been
+told that things cannot move in certain ways, or certain
+things cannot be done except by intelligent action
+or guidance; but it may be remembered that Kepler
+thought guiding spirits were needful for making the
+planets move in their elliptical orbits. If one must
+explain an obscure phenomenon, is it not wisest to explain
+it in accordance with what we know rather than in
+accordance with what we do not know? It is better for
+one to acknowledge his ignorance of the cause of it, than
+to go romancing for a reason, and repudiate all we really
+do know and its implications. A juggler may do the
+most surprising things before one's eyes, but if one
+cares to inquire into the antecedents of anything done
+he will have no difficulty in tracing it as far as the
+\DPPageSep{407.png}{392}%
+\index{Thought transference}%
+breakfast. What is meant is, the juggler does nothing
+which does not require energy,---energy of the ordinary
+sort, in the same sense as if it had been required
+for sawing wood or walking up the street. As for consciousness,
+dexterity, and all that is implied in both, I
+pointed out a little way back there could be neither in
+the absence of those changes which constitute physical
+phenomena; and that not only life itself, but consciousness
+as we know it, would be impossible without the
+exchanges in the energy embodied in the cellular structure
+of the brain. In the light of what has been accomplished
+in the direction of physiological psychology, it
+is entirely unwarrantable to assume that even thinking
+can go on in the absence of physical changes of measurable
+magnitude; and this is the same as saying that
+what we call intelligent action is physical at its basis.
+
+There is such a formal agreement as well as actual
+connection between conscious life and the life of the
+brain, that it is not to be supposed any one who has properly
+attended to the facts will venture to deny them.
+Argue as one will, it is true there is no experimental
+knowledge that is a part of science, of consciousness
+separable from a material structure called brain, in which
+physiological changes take place as the conditions for
+thinking as well as for acting. This is the only known
+relation of mind and body. However this association of
+such apparently different provinces is to be explained,
+it is still true that for every phenomenon in consciousness
+there is a corresponding phenomenon in matter.
+Psychologists have pointed out that the phenomena indicate
+an identity at bottom between the activity of
+\DPPageSep{408.png}{393}%
+consciousness and cerebral activity. To follow this out
+into particulars would be interesting and perhaps profitable
+to most; but the significance of it here is that even
+in the psychological field, where the opportunities for investigation
+are right at hand and most is known, there
+is no evidence for consciousness apart from a material
+structure, or that the law of conservation of energy does
+not hold as strictly true here as elsewhere in physics.
+So there is no experimental reason for assuming the
+existence of incorporeal intelligences. There is no
+psychological question that is not at the same time a
+physiological question.
+
+Experimentally it appears that the association of mind
+with matter and energy is not of such a nature that one
+is at liberty to assume their dissociation, any more than
+one is at liberty to assume gravitation or magnetism as
+independent existing somethings controlling matter according
+to certain laws. So any hypothesis invented to
+account for an occurrence that is not yet explained ought
+not to be in contradiction to everything else we know,
+and ought not to be entertained except as a last resort;
+and the hypothesis of disembodied intelligences acting
+now in and now out of the field of material things is
+such an one. If such phenomena really happen at
+\textit{séances} as are alleged, then we have to do with affairs
+strictly within the line of physics, whether such phenomena
+are so-called mental or so-called physical. It is
+useless to affirm that the two are such radically different
+phenomena that the methods of the latter are not
+appropriate in the former; and the extensive laboratories
+for physiological psychology, which are now
+\DPPageSep{409.png}{394}%
+being established in all the larger institutions of
+learning, is a sufficient denial of the proposition.
+
+The term psychics is intended to denote something
+different from the phenomena of psychology as manifested
+in a given organism. It is supposed to relate to
+the sympathetic relation of one mind to that of another
+quite apart from the ordinary physical relations, that is,
+from the senses. As for the mind-reading as exhibited
+some years ago by Brown and others, I believe it is now
+agreed that it is due to the sense of touch, and cannot
+be done without contact. In hypnotic work there has
+to be ``suggestion,'' and most of the very remarkable
+cases, such as those in France last winter, have been
+shown to be gross frauds. But let it be granted that
+some of it is genuine, that it is possible in some cases
+to impart information and discover the thoughts of
+another without the common resources, it does not
+then follow that the method is extra-physical. If only
+here and there is to be found an individual called a
+psychic, who is thus sensitive, and it is not a race
+endowment, one no more need to summon a mysterious
+supernormal agency to account for it, than such is
+needed for the work of Newton or Mozart. Because a
+phenomenon has not been explained, and no one knows
+how to explain it, is no reason at all for supposing there
+is anything mysterious about it. There are any number
+of phenomena throughout nature that have not
+been explained, and no one knows how to explain on
+the basis of what is known. Such, for instance, is the
+whirlwind that crosses the field, raising dust and leaves
+into the air. No one has explained the soaring of birds,
+\DPPageSep{410.png}{395}%
+no one knows what goes on in an active nerve, or why
+atoms are selective in their associates. Ignorance is
+not a proper basis for speculation; and if one must have
+a theory, let it be one having some obvious continuity
+with our best physical knowledge.
+
+What is here given is not intended to be a denial that
+such phenomena as thought-transference, or even the
+most surprising things such as those described in the
+Milan experiments, take place. It is only intended to
+emphasize the probability that whatever happens has a
+physical basis, and is therefore explained only when
+these physical relations are known.
+\DPPageSep{411.png}{unnumbered}%
+%[Blank Page]
+
+
+\Appendix
+\DPPageSep{412.png}{397}%
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{57}.}
+\Pagelabel{400}%
+
+\First{As} to whether it is considered as known that the sum of
+the interior angles of a plane triangle are exactly equal to
+one hundred and eighty degrees: ``Suppose that three points
+are taken in space, distant from one another as far as the
+sun is from $\alpha$~Centauri; and that the shortest distance between
+these points is drawn so as to form a triangle. And suppose
+the angles of this triangle to be very accurately measured
+and added together; this can at present be done so accurately
+that the error shall certainly be less than one minute,
+less therefore than the five-thousandth part of a right angle.
+Then I do not know that this sum would differ at all from
+two right angles; but I also \emph{do not know that the difference
+would be less than ten degrees}, and I have reasons for not
+knowing.''
+\AppendixCite{W.~K. Clifford:}{Aims and Instruments of Scientific Thought.}
+
+``If the Euclidian\DPnote{** [sic]} assumptions are true, the constitution
+of parts of space at an infinite distance is as well known as
+the geometry of any portion of this room. So that here we
+have real knowledge of something at least that concerns the
+cosmos; something that is true throughout the immensities
+and the eternities. That something Lobotchewski\DPnote{** [sic]} and his
+successors have taken away.''
+\AppendixCite{W.~K. Clifford:}{Philosophy of the Pure Sciences.}
+\DPPageSep{413.png}{398}%
+
+``In this case the universe as known becomes a valid conception,
+for the extent of space is a finite number of cubic
+miles. If you were to start in any direction whatever, and
+move in a perfectly straight line according to the definition
+of Liebnitz,\DPnote{** [sic]} after travelling a most prodigious distance \ldots
+you would arrive at---this place.''
+\AppendixRef{\textsc{Ibid.}}
+
+``It must remain an open question whether, if we had
+large enough triangles, the sum of the three angles would
+still be two right angles.''
+\AppendixRef{\textit{Enc.\ Brit.\ 9th~ed., Art.\ Measurement.}}
+
+``It is true that according to the axioms of geometry, the
+sum of the three angles of a triangle are precisely one hundred
+and eighty degrees; but these axioms are now exploded,
+and geometers confess that they, as geometers, know not the
+slightest reason for supposing them to be precisely true.
+That they are exactly that amount is what nobody can be
+justified in concluding.''
+\AppendixCitePage{C.~S. Peirce:}{Monist,}{vol.~i.\ No.~2, p.~174.}
+
+``All that we need do is to call the attention of those who
+busy themselves with mental philosophy to this generalization
+of geometry as one of the results of modern mathematical
+research which they cannot afford to overlook.''
+\AppendixCite{George Chrystal,}{in Enc.\ Brit., Art.\ Parallels.}
+
+Such as care to look into the matter further will find
+the subject treated in an untechnical way in the works of
+W.~K.~Clifford, in the chapters on the ``Theories of the
+Physical Forces,'' ``Aims and Instruments of Scientific
+Thought,'' and especially the ``Philosophy of the Pure Sciences.''
+There is much on it in the \textit{American Journal of
+Mathematics}, vols. \i.~and~ii., also in the ``Proceedings of the
+Royal Society,'' Edinburgh, vol.~x., 1879, and in article
+``Measurement,'' \textit{Enc.~Brit.}
+\DPPageSep{414.png}{399}%
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{208}.}
+\Pagelabel{402a}%
+
+In 1881 the author discovered how electric ether waves
+could be produced and identified, where the vibratory rates
+were as high as $4000$ or more per second, by employing
+static telephones detached and removed many feet from
+the inducing electric current. These gave a wave length
+of $\frac{186000}{4000} = 46+$ miles long. Hertz, Tesla, and others have
+since then described methods of producing them so short
+as to be but a few feet long. When they have thus been
+mechanically shortened so as to be but the one forty-thousandth
+of an inch in length, they will be seen by the eye as
+red light.
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{242}.}
+\Pagelabel{402b}%
+
+See Maxwell's ``Theory of Heat,'' pp.~160, 161.
+
+\settowidth{\TmpLen}{$\dfrac{H}{S} = \dfrac{h}{T}$.}
+\begin{wrapfigure}[2]{l}{\TmpLen+\parindent}
+\hfill\smash{$\dfrac{H}{S} = \dfrac{h}{T}$.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+\noindent $S$~and~$T$ are the absolute temperatures of the
+hot and cold bodies in Carnot's engine. $H$
+and $h$ are the quantities of heat taken up and given out.
+When $T = 0°$, $h = 0$, when $h$ is the equivalent of the work
+done. As this is $0$ at absolute zero, no work could be done
+in changing the volume of a substance at that temperature.
+There can be no cohesion among the molecules or atoms, for
+this would require that work should be done to separate
+them. It is the temperature of \emph{dissociation}.
+
+This conclusion is one to which chemists and physicists
+have been led by their researches. For example, Dr.\ Lothar
+Meyer says, ``At the lowest temperature to which we can
+attain, the majority of chemical reactions studied under
+these conditions have been found to cease or to proceed
+very slowly, so that it would appear to be very probable that
+at the absolute zero, viz., $273°$, a temperature much below
+the lowest yet attained, chemical action would cease altogether
+from the absence of any form of heat motion whatsoever;
+so without heat there would be no exertion of the
+so-called chemical affinity.''
+\AppendixRef{\textit{Modern Theories of Chemistry}, §~211.}
+\DPPageSep{415.png}{400}%
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{277}.}
+\Pagelabel{403}%
+
+The hypothesis of a ``vital principle'' is now as completely
+discarded as the hypothesis of phlogiston in chemistry.
+No biologist with a reputation to lose would for a
+moment think of defending it.
+\AppendixCitePage{John Fiske:}{Cosmic Philosophy,}{vol.~i.\ p.~422.}
+
+``We can demonstrate the infinitely manifold and complicated
+physical and chemical properties of the albuminous
+bodies to be the real cause of organic or vital phenomena.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Haeckel:}{History of Creation,}{vol.~i.\ p.~330.}
+
+``The aim of modern physiology is to conceive all organic
+processes as physical or chemical.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Höffding:}{Outlines of Psychology,}{p.~57.}
+
+``Physiologists must expect to meet with an unconditional
+conformity to law of the forces of nature in their inquiries
+respecting the vital processes. They will have to apply
+themselves to the investigation of the physical and chemical
+processes going on within the organism.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Helmholtz:}{Scientific Lectures,}{p.~384.}
+
+``A vital element, i.e., an element peculiar to organisms,
+no more exists than does a vital force working independently
+of natural and material processes.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Claus \& Sedgwick:}{Zoölogy,}{part~i.\ p.~10.}
+
+``In Physiology the word life is understood to mean the
+chemical and physical activities of the parts of which the
+organism consists.''
+\AppendixCitePage{B. Sanderson:}{Nature,}{vol.~xlviii., p.~613.}
+
+``Modern physiology interprets the phenomena of organic
+life by means of physical and chemical laws. An appeal to
+`vital force' or to the intervention of mind, it does not
+recognize as an explanation of an organic phenomenon.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Höffding:}{Outlines of Psychology,}{p.~10.}
+\DPPageSep{416.png}{401}%
+
+``Physiology thus appears as a branch of applied physics,
+its problems being a reduction of vital phenomena to general
+physical laws and thus ultimately to the fundamental laws
+of mechanics.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Wundt:}{Lehrbuch der Physiologie,}{p.~2.}
+
+``It must not be supposed that the differences between
+living and not living matter are such as to justify the
+assumption that the forces at work in the one are different
+from those to be met with in the other.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Huxley:}{Art.\ Biology, Enc.\ Brit.,}{p.~681.}
+
+``Zoölogy, the science which seeks to arrange and discuss
+the phenomena of animal life and form as the outcome
+of the operation of the laws of physics and chemistry.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Lankester:}{Art.\ Zoölogy, Enc.\ Brit.,}{p.~803.}
+
+``If corporal functions are mediated by immaterial
+agencies, physiological science is impossible.''
+\AppendixCitePage{G.~Stanley Hall:}{Amer.\ Jour.\ Psychology,}{vol.~iii.\ p.~74.}
+
+``It has not occurred to me that any one now uses the
+term `vital force' in any other way than as a convenient
+method of expressing the sum total of the physical and
+chemical activities of organisms.''
+\AppendixCite{Prof.\ E.~L. Mark,}{Harvard University.}
+
+``These phenomena of life, though they may not as yet be
+physically and chemically explained, are certainly not to be
+referred to the working of any special \emph{vital force} peculiar
+to organisms\ldots. We have to do here with the same
+forces and the same substances that we meet with elsewhere
+in nature.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Lang:}{Textbook of Comp.\ Anat.,}{London, 1891, p.~2.}
+
+``Modern science has allowed the vitalistic theory (\textit{vitalismus})
+to drop; instead of by means of a special vital force,
+it explains irritability as a very complex chemico-physical
+phenomenon. It is only distinguished from other chemico-physical
+\DPPageSep{417.png}{402}%
+phenomena of inorganic nature by degree, namely,
+that the external stimuli come in contact with a substance
+of complicated structure, an organism, and correspondingly
+produce in it also a series of complicated processes.''
+\AppendixCitePage{O.~Hertwig:}{Die Zelle und die Gewebe,}{p.~75, 1893.}
+
+``I know of no authority in recent years which recognizes
+a distinct vital force; all students of nature, so far as I am
+aware, explain all the phenomena of life by means of physical
+and chemical forces.\DPtypo{}{''}
+\AppendixCite{Prof.\ J.~S. Kingsley,}{Tufts College.}
+
+%\DPPageSep{418.png}{403}%
+% [** PP: Not small-capping first index entry]
+
+\normalsize
+\clearpage
+\fancyhf{}
+\cleardoublepage
+
+\IndexBookmark
+\fancyhead[C]{\textsc{INDEX}}
+\printindex
+
+\iffalse
+Action at a distance 88
+
+Absolute zero 242, 336
+
+Affinity, chemical 240
+
+Albumen, size of molecule 15
+
+Ampère turns 209
+
+Arcturus 145
+
+Arc light 216
+
+Atmosphere, height of 26
+
+Atoms 10, 18, 19
+
+Atoms, unalterable 21, 22
+
+Atoms, life associated with 24, 296
+
+Atoms, chemical properties 239
+
+Atoms, as vortex rings 349
+
+Atoms, vibrations of 243
+
+Attraction, gravitative 83, 309
+
+Attraction of vibrating fork 87
+
+Attraction of disks 94
+
+Attraction depends upon distance 85
+
+Attraction of vortex rings 95, 244
+% \indexspace
+
+Blavatsky, Madam, pretensions of 359
+
+Bonnenburger's apparatus 40
+
+Boiling-point pressure 125
+% \indexspace
+
+Cause and effect 75
+
+Camera 162, 163
+
+Catalysis 248
+
+Cell structure 280
+
+Charles, Law of 336
+
+Chemism 238
+
+Chemism and heat 241, 336
+
+Chemical field 247, 305
+
+Chemical effects 218
+
+Chemical origin of electricity 177
+
+Chemical reactions depend on temperature 336
+
+Cohesion, in solids and liquids 332
+
+Cohesion, destroyed 333
+
+Colors 165
+
+Color-blindness 171
+
+Color, nature of 339
+
+Combustion 103
+
+Conductivity, electrical 190, 192
+
+Consciousness implies energy 390
+
+Corti's fibres 275
+
+Corn, life of 291
+
+Crookes' tubes 224
+
+Crystallization 245, 249, 306
+% \indexspace
+
+Decomposition of water 218
+
+Density 6
+
+Diamond, hardness of 338
+
+Dissociations 131, 219
+
+Dispersion 138
+
+Dynamo 213
+% \indexspace
+
+Ear 274
+
+Earth, velocity of, in space 34
+
+Earth, diameter of 55
+%\DPPageSep{419.png}{404}%
+
+Earth, a magnet 303
+
+Earth, curvature 69
+
+Earth, solidity of 126
+
+Egg 291
+
+Echo 265
+
+Efficiency of machines 213
+
+Elasticity 341
+
+Elasticity due to motion 39, 341
+
+Elements 136
+
+Energy, factors of 70, 77
+
+Energy in the ether 79, 105
+
+Energy. What determines transfer 214
+
+Energy, unknown, preface.
+
+Electricity, origin of 174, 229, 354
+
+Electricity, thermal 174
+
+Electricity, mechanical origin 180, 230
+
+Electricity, magnetic origin 181
+
+Electricity, electrical origin 182, 230
+
+Electrical antecedents 186
+
+Electrical effects 231
+
+Electrical effects, reversible 232
+
+Electricity, dual 234
+
+Electricity, activity 194
+
+Electrical field 196, 300
+
+Electrical stress 197
+
+Electrical waves 198, 303
+
+Electro-magnets 81, 210
+
+Electric lamps 215
+
+Energy of translation 64
+
+Energy of vibration 66
+
+Energy of rotation 68
+
+Ether 26, 32, 34, 80
+
+Ether, a non-conductor 191
+
+Ether waves 134
+
+Ether wave qualities 134
+
+Ether phenomena not explained 352
+
+Ether waves, their source 135, 207
+
+Ether pressure 205
+
+Ether rotations 234
+
+Explosion products 71
+% \indexspace
+
+Fable, La Fontaine's 357
+
+Falling bodies 60
+
+Falling bodies, energy of 60
+
+Fibres of Corti 275
+
+Fields, physical 298
+
+Fields, chemical 247, 305
+
+Fields, electrical 196, 300
+
+Fields, magnetic 202, 214, 252
+
+Fields, mechanical 247
+
+Fields, thermal 298
+
+Flames 137
+
+Foot-pound 60, 62
+
+Food 284
+
+Foster, Dr.\ Michael, quoted 296
+
+Force, vital 279
+
+Friction, its effects 23, 34
+
+Fuels 103
+% \indexspace
+
+Galvanic battery 178
+
+Gas, motion in 333
+
+Gas, free path in 334
+
+Gas, pressure in 334, 336
+
+Gas, destroyed 336
+
+Gaseous absorption 142
+
+Geometry 56, 57 % Appendix.
+
+Geometry@{Appendix.}
+
+Geissler's tubes 223
+
+Goose, work in flying 65
+
+Gravitation 82, 90, 309, 347
+
+Gravitation, law of 84
+
+Gravity, specific 7
+
+Gravity follows from structure 348
+
+Growth 250, 292, 310
+
+Growth of crystals 283, 381
+
+Growth of lobster 283
+
+Gunpowder 103
+
+Guppy, Mrs. 359
+
+Gyroscope 342
+% \indexspace
+
+Hair-cloth loom 312
+
+Hardness not atomic property 338
+%\DPPageSep{420.png}{405}%
+
+Hearing, what is implied in 370
+
+Hertz waves 344, 351
+
+Helmholtz 35
+
+Heat, mechanical origin of 99
+
+Heat, chemical origin of 102
+
+Heat, electrical origin of 104
+
+Heat, radiational origin of 105
+
+Heat, mechanical equivalent 109
+
+Heat unit 112
+
+Heat, effects 123, 254, 335
+
+Heat by impact 225
+
+Heat of the sun, origin of 119
+
+Heat, nature of 115, 118
+
+Hypothesis, needful 94
+
+Hypothesis, gravitation 90
+
+Hydrogen vibrations 116
+% \indexspace
+
+Impenetrability 340
+
+Immortality 24, 367
+
+Inertia 70, 345
+
+Induction coils 208
+
+Inductive action 183, 195, 250, 302
+% \indexspace
+
+Joule 110
+
+Jupiter, temperature of 144
+%[**missing \indexspace]
+
+Kepler, the guesser 90
+
+Kinetics 46
+
+Kinematics 46
+
+Knowledge, rapid growth of 384
+% \indexspace
+
+Laws not compulsory 353
+
+Law, physical 373
+
+Lever 317
+
+Life 277 % Appendix.
+
+Life@{Appendix.}
+
+Life, definitions of 278
+
+Light, a sensation 135, 363
+
+Light, energy of 80
+
+Light, its velocity 26, 28
+
+Light, its nature 27, 80, 134, 364
+
+Light waves 207
+
+Lightning 185, 223
+
+Lighting, electric 214, 222
+
+Luminous effects 222
+% \indexspace
+
+Matter, living 283, 294
+
+Matter, characteristic property 4
+
+Matter, its definition 4
+
+Matter, divisibility of 8
+
+Matter, effect of temperature upon 132, 336
+
+Matter, as modes of motion 331
+
+Matter, states of 332
+
+Mass 345
+
+Materialists 351
+
+Materializations and energy 365
+
+Mars, atmosphere of 144
+
+Mars, signalling to 217
+
+Machines 312, 325
+
+Magnetic field 202, 204, 214, 252, 303
+
+Magnetic induction 208
+
+Magnetic rotation 235
+
+Magnetic waves 81, 202, 207, 344
+
+Magnet, electro 81
+
+Mathematics 89
+
+Mechanical field 307
+
+Medium, necessity for 29
+
+Mental processes imply physical conditions 388
+
+Meteors 21, 26, 64
+
+Mercury 55
+
+Miracles possible 353
+
+Miracle defined 386
+
+Mind and energy 390
+
+Mind, a material habitat for 24
+
+Mind and matter 24, 393
+
+Mirrors 147
+
+Microscope, magnifying powers 15, 149
+
+Molecules, size of 13, 18, 46
+
+Molecules, loaded 160
+
+Molecules, long free path 224
+%\DPPageSep{421.png}{406}%
+
+Molecules, number of, in universe 124
+
+Motion, kinds of 46, 48, 49, 145
+
+Motion, velocity of 50
+
+Motion, transformations of 314
+
+Motion, molecular and atomic 49
+
+Motion, laws of 70, 73
+
+Motion, antecedent of 72
+
+Molecular fatigue 78
+
+Molecular stability 281
+
+Momentum 74
+
+Motor, electric 212
+
+Muscles 286
+
+Muscular work 67
+
+Musical sounds 268
+
+Musical ratios 269
+
+Musical instruments 271
+% \indexspace
+
+Newton, Sir Isaac 30, 82, 83, 88
+
+Nerves, their functions 288, 290
+
+Nebula theory 97
+
+Neptune, discovery of 89
+
+Noise 269
+% \indexspace
+
+Ohm's law 189
+
+Organic and inorganic matter, difference between 366
+% \indexspace
+
+Phenomena, nature of 59
+
+Phenomena, unexplained 353, 394
+
+Phenomena physical, implications
+
+of 354
+
+Photography 156
+
+Phosphorescence 226
+
+Physical fields 298
+
+Physical universe a machine 330
+
+Physical processes, reversible 232
+
+Physicists, prepossessions 382
+
+Pitch 259
+
+Plating, electro 221
+
+Polarization of molecules 178, 219
+
+Postulates of Physical Science 356
+
+Power, needed for rapid movement in air 359
+
+Potential, electrical 189
+
+Principia 31, 70
+
+Prism 138
+
+Protoplasm 280
+
+Psychics 394
+
+Pulley 317
+
+Purpurine 169
+
+Push and pull 315
+% \indexspace
+
+Radiometer 154
+
+Reflection 147
+
+Retina, its functions 171
+
+Reflex action 172
+
+Refraction 138, 147
+
+Resistance, electrical 192, 214
+
+Rotations in ether 235
+% \indexspace
+
+Satellite 69
+
+Saturn, temperature of 144
+
+Science, no one independent 378
+
+Senses 161, 371
+
+Séances, phenomena at 362, 379
+
+Seeing, what is implied in 369
+
+Sirius 145
+
+Silver salts unstable 159
+
+Soap-bubbles 10
+
+Sound, origin of 257, 360
+
+Sound, characteristics 262
+
+Sound, range of 263
+
+Sound, velocity of 263
+
+Sound, vocal 272
+
+Solar system 329
+
+Space 58
+
+Space, navigation of 154
+
+Specialists 373
+
+Spiritualistic theory 360
+
+Specific gravity 7
+
+Specific heat 130
+
+Spectroscope 139
+
+Spectrum analysis 140
+%\DPPageSep{422.png}{407}%
+
+Spectrum, solar 138, 142
+
+Spark, electric 223
+
+Spirit disembodied 360
+
+Stress in ether 93
+
+Stress in glass 92
+
+Stress, electrical 183, 197, 231
+
+Stress, magnetic 181
+
+Steam-engine 113
+
+Steam-engine, efficiency of 114
+
+Stars, their number 18
+
+Stars, their distance 19, 28
+
+Stars, their motions 145
+
+Sun, its distance 28, 56
+
+Sun, its magnitude 122
+
+Sun, its heat 122
+
+Sun, its age 122
+
+Sun, its structure 143
+% \indexspace
+
+Temperature 106
+
+Temperature, table 108
+
+Temperature, maximum 127
+
+Terminology, electrical 186
+
+Telegraph 211
+
+Telephone 211
+
+Thermometer 107
+
+Tesla ether waves 344
+
+Thermometer, air 109
+
+Thomson, Sir Wm. 35
+
+Thermodynamics 112
+
+Thermopile 176
+
+Thermodynamics, electric 174
+
+Thought transference 395, 311
+
+Toepler-Holtz electrical machine 294
+
+Top, sleep of 72
+
+Transparency 146
+
+Transformations of motion 321
+% \indexspace
+
+Universe, its size 28
+
+Universe, atoms in 20
+% \indexspace
+
+Vacuum, a non-conductor 223
+
+Vacuum 47
+
+Venus 55
+
+Velocities 50, 54, 56
+
+Vibrations per second 52, 53
+
+Vibrations, gaseous 116
+
+Vibrations, sympathetic 249, 267
+
+Vibrations, forced 267
+
+Vital force 279 % Appendix.
+
+Vital force@{Appendix.}
+
+Vision, phenomena of 164
+
+Vision, hallucinations of 166
+
+Vision, energy needed for 166
+
+Vision of animals 168
+
+Vision, theory of 168
+
+Voice 272
+
+Vortex ring theory of matter 94
+
+Vortex ring model 342
+
+Vortex rings in air 35
+
+Vortex rings, properties of 37, 72
+
+Volcanoes 127
+% \indexspace
+
+Wave lengths of sound 265
+
+Waves, electric 303
+
+Water decomposition 218
+
+Weight 61
+
+Weights, standards of 60
+
+Welding, electric 210
+
+Work, standard of 60
+
+Work, measure of 62, 64, 318
+
+Work, muscular 67
+\fi
+
+\cleardoublepage
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Catalog}{Catalog}
+
+%\DPPageSep{423.png}{I}%
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.5pt}
+\fancyhead[C]{\textit{Books Upon Various Subjects}}
+\thispagestyle{empty}
+
+\begin{center}
+\textsf{\Large LEE AND SHEPARD}\\[12pt]
+\textsf{\large 10~MILK STREET BOSTON}\\[8pt]
+\tb\\[12pt]
+{\Large List of Books upon Various Subjects}\\[8pt]
+\tb
+\end{center}
+
+\Entry{QUABBIN}
+
+\Subentry
+Sketches in a Small Town \quad With Outlooks upon Puritan Life \quad By \Au{Francis~H.
+Underwood}~LL.D. author of ``Handbooks of English Literature''
+``Man Proposes'' ``Lord of Himself'' etc. Fully illustrated
+Cloth \$1.75
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+This work purports to give an account of the progress of a small New England town;
+but it is of wider and deeper import; namely, a view of the development of the narrow
+and sombre Puritan into the variously gifted and accomplished ``Yankee'' of to-day. It
+concerns the state of literature and art in the early part of the present century, and shows
+how the fairer conditions of modern times came into being.
+
+In plan it is wholly unlike any modern book. It is not a town history, nor an historical
+essay, nor a collection of reminiscences. Its chapters are mostly picturesque descriptions
+of the old times, and show the ``rude forefathers'' at home, at church, at town-meetings, at
+road-making, and in other scenes of their daily life. There are sketches of the successive
+ministers, the schools, the quiltings, sleigh-rides, and other rustic gatherings,---of the
+homely speech and manners, and of the complexities of Yankee character.
+
+It is believed that these graphic, tender, and humorous pictures will appeal to the hearts
+and memories of New England people, and to their descendants along the line of migration
+westward to the Mississippi and beyond.
+
+The illustrations are from photographs taken from beautiful scenes in ``Quabbin.''
+\end{Descrip}
+
+\clearpage
+\Entry{UNIVERSAL PHONOGRAPHY or Short-hand by the ``Allen
+Method''}
+
+\Subentry
+A self-instructor, whereby more speed than long-hand writing is gained at
+the first lesson, and additional speed at each subsequent lesson \quad By \Au{G.~G.
+Allen}, Principal of the Allen Stenographic Institute Boston \quad 50~cents
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+There is scarcely any requirement so helpful to the student, scholar, scientist, or professional
+man as short-hand writing. Heretofore all methods have required so long a
+time before one could become so proficient as to make it of any advantage, that men in
+middle life, or busy men, have not been able to give the time to learn it; but by the ``Allen
+Method'' one can almost in ``the idle moments of a busy life,'' certainly in an hour a day
+for two or three months, become so expert as to report a lecture \textit{verbatim}.
+\end{Descrip}
+%\DPPageSep{424.png}{II}%
+%Font size changes on this page
+\Entry{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}
+
+\Subentry
+The Factors and Relations of Physical Science \quad By \Au{Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear}
+Tufts College author of ``The Telephone'' ``The Art of Projecting''
+etc. \quad Cloth~\$2.00
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+``Matter, Ether, and Motion,'' the Factors and Relations of Physical Science, by A.~E.
+Dolbear,~Ph.D\@. The author in this treatise presents to his readers the principles of physical
+science. The chapters are arranged as Matter, Ether, Motion, Energy, Gravitation,
+Heat, Ether Waves, Electricity, Chemism, Sound, Life, Physical Fields, Machines and
+Mechanism. This is a tolerably comprehensive table, and introduces the student to the
+principles on which, so far as at present known, the action of the universe seems to
+depend.
+
+Altogether this little treatise gives an insight into matters outside the common range of
+serious study, and yet places the subject within reach of the student seeking for knowledge.
+Although dealing with abstruse scientific topics, the style is lucid, and the matter intelligible
+to ordinary thinkers and readers in search of information.---\textit{New York Commercial
+Advertiser}.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+\Entry{THE TELEPHONE}
+
+\Subentry
+An account of the phenomena of electricity, magnetism, and sound as involved
+in its action; with directions for making a speaking telephone \quad
+By \Au{Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear} of Tufts College \quad 50~cents
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+An interesting little book upon this most fascinating subject, which is treated in a very
+clear and methodical way. First we have a thorough review of the discoveries in electricity,
+then of magnetism, then of those in the study of sound,---pitch, velocity, timbre, tone,
+resonance, sympathetic vibrations, etc. From these the telephone is reached, and by them
+in a measure explained.---\textit{Hartford Courant}.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+\Entry{THE ART OF PROJECTING}
+
+\Subentry
+By \textsc{Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear}~Ph.D. (Tufts College) \quad New Edition revised
+with additions \quad $125$~illustrations \quad Cloth~\$2.00
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+A Manual of Experimentation in Physics, Chemistry, and Natural History with the Porte
+Lumière and the Magic Lantern; also with Electric Lights and Lamps and the Production
+and Phenomena of Vortex Rings.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+\Entry{WHAT IS TO BE DONE--(Emergency Handbook)}
+
+\Subentry
+A Handbook for the Nursery with Useful Hints for Children and Adults \quad
+By \Au{Robert~B. Dixon}~M.D. Surgeon of the Fifth Massachusetts Infantry,
+Physician to the Boston Dispensary \quad Cloth 50~cents; paper 30~cents
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+Dr.\ Dixon, in this little ``Emergency Handbook,'' gives simple directions what to do
+in a number of the most common cases that arise, either in home treatment of slight accidents,
+or indispositions, or in the case of patients in more serious cases, until the arrival of
+the physician. The book is worth its weight in gold, and ought to have a place in every
+family library.---\textit{Providence Press}.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% GUTENBERG LICENSE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\clearpage
+\fancyhf{}
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
+\cleardoublepage
+
+\backmatter
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Back Matter}{Back Matter}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG License}{Project Gutenberg License}
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.5pt}
+\fancyhead[C]{\textsc{LICENSING}}
+
+\begin{PGtext}
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed.,
+enl., by Amos Emerson Dolbear
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION ***
+
+***** This file should be named 31428-pdf.pdf or 31428-pdf.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/1/4/2/31428/
+
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+\end{PGtext}
+
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed.,
+% enl., by Amos Emerson Dolbear %
+% %
+% *** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION *** %
+% %
+% ***** This file should be named 31428-t.tex or 31428-t.zip ***** %
+% This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: %
+% http://www.gutenberg.org/3/1/4/2/31428/ %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\end{document}
+
+###
+@ControlwordReplace = (
+ ['\\Example', 'Example']
+ );
+
+@MathEnvironments = (
+ ['\\begin{DPalign*}','\\end{DPalign*}','<DPALIGN>'],
+ ['\\begin{DPgather*}','\\end{DPgather*}','<DPGATHER>']
+ );
+
+@ControlwordArguments = (
+ ['\\hyperref', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Chapter', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, 'Chapter ', '. ', 1, 1, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Chapref', 1, 1, '', '', 1, 1, ' ', ''],
+ ['\\Eqref', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 1, ' ', ''],
+ ['\\Pageref', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Pagelabel', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Figlabel', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\tb', 0, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Graphic', 1, 0, '', '<ILLUSTRATION>', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\SetRunningHeads', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\AppendixCite', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\AppendixCitePage', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPtypo', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPnote', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\First', 1, 1, '', '']
+ );
+###
+This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) (format=pdflatex 2009.12.9) 27 FEB 2010 10:00
+entering extended mode
+ %&-line parsing enabled.
+**31428-t.tex
+(./31428-t.tex
+LaTeX2e <2005/12/01>
+Babel <v3.8h> and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumylang, noh
+yphenation, arabic, farsi, croatian, ukrainian, russian, bulgarian, czech, slov
+ak, danish, dutch, finnish, basque, french, german, ngerman, ibycus, greek, mon
+ogreek, ancientgreek, hungarian, italian, latin, mongolian, norsk, icelandic, i
+nterlingua, turkish, coptic, romanian, welsh, serbian, slovenian, estonian, esp
+eranto, uppersorbian, indonesian, polish, portuguese, spanish, catalan, galicia
+n, swedish, ukenglish, pinyin, loaded.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/book.cls
+Document Class: book 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/bk12.clo
+File: bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+)
+\c@part=\count79
+\c@chapter=\count80
+\c@section=\count81
+\c@subsection=\count82
+\c@subsubsection=\count83
+\c@paragraph=\count84
+\c@subparagraph=\count85
+\c@figure=\count86
+\c@table=\count87
+\abovecaptionskip=\skip41
+\belowcaptionskip=\skip42
+\bibindent=\dimen102
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty
+Package: inputenc 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+\inpenc@prehook=\toks14
+\inpenc@posthook=\toks15
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/latin1.def
+File: latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty
+Package: ifthen 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsmath.sty
+Package: amsmath 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+\@mathmargin=\skip43
+For additional information on amsmath, use the `?' option.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amstext.sty
+Package: amstext 2000/06/29 v2.01
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsgen.sty
+File: amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+\@emptytoks=\toks16
+\ex@=\dimen103
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsbsy.sty
+Package: amsbsy 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+\pmbraise@=\dimen104
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsopn.sty
+Package: amsopn 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+)
+\inf@bad=\count88
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \frac on input line 211.
+\uproot@=\count89
+\leftroot@=\count90
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \overline on input line 307.
+\classnum@=\count91
+\DOTSCASE@=\count92
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ldots on input line 379.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \dots on input line 382.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \cdots on input line 467.
+\Mathstrutbox@=\box26
+\strutbox@=\box27
+\big@size=\dimen105
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OML on input line 567.
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OMS on input line 568.
+\macc@depth=\count93
+\c@MaxMatrixCols=\count94
+\dotsspace@=\muskip10
+\c@parentequation=\count95
+\dspbrk@lvl=\count96
+\tag@help=\toks17
+\row@=\count97
+\column@=\count98
+\maxfields@=\count99
+\andhelp@=\toks18
+\eqnshift@=\dimen106
+\alignsep@=\dimen107
+\tagshift@=\dimen108
+\tagwidth@=\dimen109
+\totwidth@=\dimen110
+\lineht@=\dimen111
+\@envbody=\toks19
+\multlinegap=\skip44
+\multlinetaggap=\skip45
+\mathdisplay@stack=\toks20
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \[ on input line 2666.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \] on input line 2667.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amssymb.sty
+Package: amssymb 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amsfonts.sty
+Package: amsfonts 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+\symAMSa=\mathgroup4
+\symAMSb=\mathgroup5
+LaTeX Font Info: Overwriting math alphabet `\mathfrak' in version `bold'
+(Font) U/euf/m/n --> U/euf/b/n on input line 132.
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/alltt.sty
+Package: alltt 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/array.sty
+Package: array 2005/08/23 v2.4b Tabular extension package (FMi)
+\col@sep=\dimen112
+\extrarowheight=\dimen113
+\NC@list=\toks21
+\extratabsurround=\skip46
+\backup@length=\skip47
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/mathpazo.sty
+Package: mathpazo 2005/04/12 PSNFSS-v9.2a Palatino w/ Pazo Math (D.Puga, WaS)
+\symupright=\mathgroup6
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/yfonts/yfonts.sty
+Package: yfonts 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/bigfoot/perpage.sty
+Package: perpage 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+\c@abspage=\count100
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/multicol.sty
+Package: multicol 2006/05/18 v1.6g multicolumn formatting (FMi)
+\c@tracingmulticols=\count101
+\mult@box=\box28
+\multicol@leftmargin=\dimen114
+\c@unbalance=\count102
+\c@collectmore=\count103
+\doublecol@number=\count104
+\multicoltolerance=\count105
+\multicolpretolerance=\count106
+\full@width=\dimen115
+\page@free=\dimen116
+\premulticols=\dimen117
+\postmulticols=\dimen118
+\multicolsep=\skip48
+\multicolbaselineskip=\skip49
+\partial@page=\box29
+\last@line=\box30
+\mult@rightbox=\box31
+\mult@grightbox=\box32
+\mult@gfirstbox=\box33
+\mult@firstbox=\box34
+\@tempa=\box35
+\@tempa=\box36
+\@tempa=\box37
+\@tempa=\box38
+\@tempa=\box39
+\@tempa=\box40
+\@tempa=\box41
+\@tempa=\box42
+\@tempa=\box43
+\@tempa=\box44
+\@tempa=\box45
+\@tempa=\box46
+\@tempa=\box47
+\@tempa=\box48
+\@tempa=\box49
+\@tempa=\box50
+\@tempa=\box51
+\c@columnbadness=\count107
+\c@finalcolumnbadness=\count108
+\last@try=\dimen119
+\multicolovershoot=\dimen120
+\multicolundershoot=\dimen121
+\mult@nat@firstbox=\box52
+\colbreak@box=\box53
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/makeidx.sty
+Package: makeidx 2000/03/29 v1.0m Standard LaTeX package
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
+Package: caption 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption3.sty
+Package: caption3 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty
+Package: keyval 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+\KV@toks@=\toks22
+)
+\captionmargin=\dimen122
+\captionmarginx=\dimen123
+\captionwidth=\dimen124
+\captionindent=\dimen125
+\captionparindent=\dimen126
+\captionhangindent=\dimen127
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphicx.sty
+Package: graphicx 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphics.sty
+Package: graphics 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/trig.sty
+Package: trig 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/graphics.cfg
+File: graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package graphics Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 90.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/pdftex-def/pdftex.def
+File: pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+\Gread@gobject=\count109
+))
+\Gin@req@height=\dimen128
+\Gin@req@width=\dimen129
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/wrapfig/wrapfig.sty
+\wrapoverhang=\dimen130
+\WF@size=\dimen131
+\c@WF@wrappedlines=\count110
+\WF@box=\box54
+\WF@everypar=\toks23
+Package: wrapfig 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/textcomp.sty
+Package: textcomp 2005/09/27 v1.99g Standard LaTeX package
+Package textcomp Info: Sub-encoding information:
+(textcomp) 5 = only ISO-Adobe without \textcurrency
+(textcomp) 4 = 5 + \texteuro
+(textcomp) 3 = 4 + \textohm
+(textcomp) 2 = 3 + \textestimated + \textcurrency
+(textcomp) 1 = TS1 - \textcircled - \t
+(textcomp) 0 = TS1 (full)
+(textcomp) Font families with sub-encoding setting implement
+(textcomp) only a restricted character set as indicated.
+(textcomp) Family '?' is the default used for unknown fonts.
+(textcomp) See the documentation for details.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ? sub-encoding to TS1/1 on input line 71.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ts1enc.def
+File: ts1enc.def 2001/06/05 v3.0e (jk/car/fm) Standard LaTeX file
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \oldstylenums on input line 266.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 281.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmss sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 282.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 283.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmvtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 284.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmbr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 285.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmtl sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 286.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ccr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 287.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ptm sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 288.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pcr sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 289.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting phv sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 290.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ppl sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 291.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pag sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 292.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pbk sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 293.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pnc sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 294.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pzc sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 295.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting bch sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 296.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting put sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 297.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting uag sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 298.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ugq sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 299.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ul8 sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 300.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ul9 sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 301.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting augie sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 302.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting dayrom sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 303.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting dayroms sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 304.
+
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pxr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 305.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pxss sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 306.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pxtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 307.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting txr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 308.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting txss sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 309.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting txtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 310.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting futs sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 311.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting futx sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 312.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting futj sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 313.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlh sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 314.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hls sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 315.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlst sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 316.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlct sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 317.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlx sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 318.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlce sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 319.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlcn sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 320.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlcw sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 321.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlcf sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 322.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pplx sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 323.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pplj sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 324.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ptmx sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 325.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ptmj sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 326.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/indentfirst.sty
+Package: indentfirst 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/textcase/textcase.sty
+Package: textcase 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/calc.sty
+Package: calc 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+\calc@Acount=\count111
+\calc@Bcount=\count112
+\calc@Adimen=\dimen132
+\calc@Bdimen=\dimen133
+\calc@Askip=\skip50
+\calc@Bskip=\skip51
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \setlength on input line 75.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \addtolength on input line 76.
+\calc@Ccount=\count113
+\calc@Cskip=\skip52
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/fancyhdr/fancyhdr.sty
+\fancy@headwidth=\skip53
+\f@ncyO@elh=\skip54
+\f@ncyO@erh=\skip55
+\f@ncyO@olh=\skip56
+\f@ncyO@orh=\skip57
+\f@ncyO@elf=\skip58
+\f@ncyO@erf=\skip59
+\f@ncyO@olf=\skip60
+\f@ncyO@orf=\skip61
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/geometry/geometry.sty
+Package: geometry 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+\Gm@cnth=\count114
+\Gm@cntv=\count115
+\c@Gm@tempcnt=\count116
+\Gm@bindingoffset=\dimen134
+\Gm@wd@mp=\dimen135
+\Gm@odd@mp=\dimen136
+\Gm@even@mp=\dimen137
+\Gm@dimlist=\toks24
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/xelatex/xetexconfig/geometry.cfg)) (/usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty
+Package: hyperref 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+\@linkdim=\dimen138
+\Hy@linkcounter=\count117
+\Hy@pagecounter=\count118
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/pd1enc.def
+File: pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/hyperref.cfg
+File: hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/kvoptions.sty
+Package: kvoptions 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (
+HO)
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Option `hyperfootnotes' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `linktocpage' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfdisplaydoctitle' set `true' on input line 223
+8.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfpagelabels' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarksopen' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `colorlinks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 2288.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 2293.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 2296.
+Package hyperref Info: Plain pages OFF on input line 2303.
+Package hyperref Info: Backreferencing OFF on input line 2308.
+Implicit mode ON; LaTeX internals redefined
+Package hyperref Info: Bookmarks ON on input line 2444.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ltxmisc/url.sty
+\Urlmuskip=\muskip11
+Package: url 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \url on input line 2599.
+\Fld@menulength=\count119
+\Field@Width=\dimen139
+\Fld@charsize=\dimen140
+\Choice@toks=\toks25
+\Field@toks=\toks26
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 3102.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 3107.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 3110.
+Package hyperref Info: backreferencing OFF on input line 3117.
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 3120.
+\Hy@abspage=\count120
+\c@Item=\count121
+)
+*hyperref using driver hpdftex*
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hpdftex.def
+File: hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+\Fld@listcount=\count122
+)
+\c@pp@a@footnote=\count123
+\TmpLen=\skip62
+\QUAD=\skip63
+\@indexfile=\write3
+\openout3 = `31428-t.idx'.
+
+Writing index file 31428-t.idx
+(./31428-t.aux)
+\openout1 = `31428-t.aux'.
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LY/yfrak/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LYG/ygoth/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for TS1/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for TS1+cmr on input line 560.
+
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ts1cmr.fd
+File: ts1cmr.fd 1999/05/25 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for PD1/pdf/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OT1+pplj on input line 560
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ot1pplj.fd
+File: ot1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for OT1/pplj.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ragged2e/ragged2e.sty
+Package: ragged2e 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/everysel/everysel.sty
+Package: everysel 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \selectfont on input line 125.
+)
+\CenteringLeftskip=\skip64
+\RaggedLeftLeftskip=\skip65
+\RaggedRightLeftskip=\skip66
+\CenteringRightskip=\skip67
+\RaggedLeftRightskip=\skip68
+\RaggedRightRightskip=\skip69
+\CenteringParfillskip=\skip70
+\RaggedLeftParfillskip=\skip71
+\RaggedRightParfillskip=\skip72
+\JustifyingParfillskip=\skip73
+\CenteringParindent=\skip74
+\RaggedLeftParindent=\skip75
+\RaggedRightParindent=\skip76
+\JustifyingParindent=\skip77
+)
+Package caption Info: hyperref package v6.74m (or newer) detected on input line
+ 560.
+(/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/supp-pdf.tex
+[Loading MPS to PDF converter (version 2006.09.02).]
+\scratchcounter=\count124
+\scratchdimen=\dimen141
+\scratchbox=\box55
+\nofMPsegments=\count125
+\nofMParguments=\count126
+\everyMPshowfont=\toks27
+\MPscratchCnt=\count127
+\MPscratchDim=\dimen142
+\MPnumerator=\count128
+\everyMPtoPDFconversion=\toks28
+)
+-------------------- Geometry parameters
+paper: class default
+landscape: --
+twocolumn: --
+twoside: true
+asymmetric: --
+h-parts: 9.03375pt, 307.14749pt, 9.03375pt
+v-parts: 37.58047pt, 411.93877pt, 56.37076pt
+hmarginratio: 1:1
+vmarginratio: 2:3
+lines: --
+heightrounded: --
+bindingoffset: 0.0pt
+truedimen: --
+includehead: --
+includefoot: --
+includemp: --
+driver: pdftex
+-------------------- Page layout dimensions and switches
+\paperwidth 325.215pt
+\paperheight 505.89pt
+\textwidth 307.14749pt
+\textheight 411.93877pt
+\oddsidemargin -63.23624pt
+\evensidemargin -63.23624pt
+\topmargin -66.56331pt
+\headheight 15.0pt
+\headsep 19.8738pt
+\footskip 30.0pt
+\marginparwidth 27.10124pt
+\marginparsep 8.0pt
+\columnsep 10.0pt
+\skip\footins 10.8pt plus 4.0pt minus 2.0pt
+\hoffset 0.0pt
+\voffset 0.0pt
+\mag 1000
+\@twosidetrue \@mparswitchtrue
+(1in=72.27pt, 1cm=28.45pt)
+-----------------------
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/color.sty
+Package: color 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+(/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/color.cfg
+File: color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package color Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 130.
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 560.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty
+Package: nameref 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/refcount.sty
+Package: refcount 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+)
+\c@section@level=\count129
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ref on input line 560.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \pageref on input line 560.
+(./31428-t.out) (./31428-t.out)
+\@outlinefile=\write4
+\openout4 = `31428-t.out'.
+
+
+Overfull \hbox (15.85715pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 577--577
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev
+. ed., enl., by[]
+ []
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OT1+ppl on input line 599.
+
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ot1ppl.fd
+File: ot1ppl.fd 2001/06/04 font definitions for OT1/ppl.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OML+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/omlzplm.fd
+File: omlzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OML/zplm.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OMS+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/omszplm.fd
+File: omszplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMS/zplm.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OMX+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/omxzplm.fd
+File: omxzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMX/zplm.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.46208pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 9.37807pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 8.33606pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.46208pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 9.37807pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 8.33606pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OT1+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ot1zplm.fd
+File: ot1zplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OT1/zplm.
+) [1
+
+{/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <14.4> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 622.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.40997pt on input line 625.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 6.25204pt on input line 625.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.40997pt on input line 625.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 6.25204pt on input line 625.
+[2
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for TS1+pplj on input line 682
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ts1pplj.fd
+File: ts1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for TS1/pplj.
+) [3
+
+] [1
+
+] [2
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <17.28> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 740.
+[3
+
+
+
+] [4] [5] [6
+
+
+] [7] [8] [9]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <24.88> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 926.
+(./31428-t.toc
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 10.42007pt on input line 4.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 7.91925pt on input line 4.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 10.42007pt on input line 4.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 7.91925pt on input line 4.
+)
+\tf@toc=\write5
+\openout5 = `31428-t.toc'.
+
+[10
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <12> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 985.
+[1
+
+
+] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
+Overfull \hbox (0.19246pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 1211--1217
+ []
+ []
+
+[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]
+[25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30
+
+] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] <./images/048a.png, id=382,
+ 361.35pt x 254.9525pt>
+File: ./images/048a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/048a.png> [41] [42 <./images/048a.png>] <./images/049a.png, id=39
+5, 216.81pt x 273.02pt>
+File: ./images/049a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/049a.png> [43 <./images/049a.png>] [44] [45] [46] <./images/052a.
+png, id=416, 438.63875pt x 746.79pt>
+File: ./images/052a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/052a.png> [47 <./images/052a.png (PNG copy)>] [48] [49] [50] [51]
+[52
+
+] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [6
+8] [69] [70
+
+] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [8
+6] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99
+
+] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112]
+[113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118
+
+] [119] <./images/113a.png, id=740, 1039.885pt x 572.1375pt>
+File: ./images/113a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/113a.png> <./images/114a.png, id=741, 82.3075pt x 638.385pt>
+File: ./images/114a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/114a.png> [120] [121 <./images/113a.png (PNG copy)> <./images/114
+a.png>] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] <./images/121a.png, id=789, 8
+0.3pt x 544.0325pt>
+File: ./images/121a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/121a.png> [129] [130 <./images/121a.png (PNG copy)>] [131] [132]
+[133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] <./images/129a.png, id=837, 317.185pt x 299
+.1175pt>
+File: ./images/129a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/129a.png> [139] [140 <./images/129a.png (PNG copy)>] [141] [142]
+[143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [
+156] [157] [158] [159] [160
+
+] [161] [162] [163] <./images/150a.png, id=955, 1080.035pt x 156.585pt>
+File: ./images/150a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/150a.png> [164] [165 <./images/150a.png>] <./images/151a.png, id=
+967, 1138.2525pt x 616.3025pt>
+File: ./images/151a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/151a.png> [166] [167 <./images/151a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/15
+4a.png, id=978, 1086.0575pt x 152.57pt>
+File: ./images/154a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/154a.png> [168] [169] [170 <./images/154a.png>] [171] [172] [173]
+[174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] <./images/167a.png,
+ id=1051, 383.4325pt x 931.48pt>
+File: ./images/167a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/167a.png> [184] [185 <./images/167a.png (PNG copy)>] [186] [187]
+[188] [189] <./images/171a.png, id=1081, 1009.7725pt x 231.86626pt>
+File: ./images/171a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/171a.png> [190 <./images/171a.png>] [191] [192] [193] <./images/1
+74a.png, id=1103, 1060.96375pt x 290.08376pt>
+File: ./images/174a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/174a.png> <./images/175a.png, id=1104, 662.475pt x 746.79pt>
+File: ./images/175a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/175a.png> [194 <./images/174a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/175b.png
+, id=1111, 999.735pt x 572.1375pt>
+File: ./images/175b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/175b.png> [195 <./images/175a.png (PNG copy)>] [196 <./images/175
+b.png (PNG copy)>] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206]
+[207
+
+] <./images/188a.png, id=1172, 628.3475pt x 796.9775pt>
+File: ./images/188a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/188a.png> [208] [209] [210] [211 <./images/188a.png (PNG copy)>]
+<./images/190a.png, id=1194, 202.7575pt x 292.09125pt>
+File: ./images/190a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/190a.png> [212] [213 <./images/190a.png>] [214] <./images/192a.pn
+g, id=1211, 1142.2675pt x 803.0pt>
+File: ./images/192a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/192a.png> [215] [216 <./images/192a.png (PNG copy)>] [217] [218]
+[219] [220] [221] [222] [223] [224] [225] [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [
+232] [233] [234] [235] [236] [237] [238] [239] [240] <./images/213a.png, id=133
+2, 847.165pt x 578.16pt>
+File: ./images/213a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/213a.png> [241 <./images/213a.png>] [242] <./images/216a.png, id=
+1344, 397.485pt x 472.76625pt>
+File: ./images/216a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/216a.png> <./images/216b.png, id=1345, 403.5075pt x 238.8925pt>
+File: ./images/216b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/216b.png> <./images/216c.png, id=1346, 287.0725pt x 281.05pt>
+File: ./images/216c.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/216c.png> [243] [244] [245 <./images/216a.png (PNG copy)> <./imag
+es/216b.png (PNG copy)> <./images/216c.png (PNG copy)>] [246] <./images/218a.pn
+g, id=1372, 442.65375pt x 228.855pt>
+File: ./images/218a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/218a.png> [247 <./images/218a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/218b.png
+, id=1379, 236.885pt x 104.39pt>
+File: ./images/218b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/218b.png> [248 <./images/218b.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/220a.png
+, id=1386, 479.7925pt x 214.8025pt>
+File: ./images/220a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/220a.png> [249] [250 <./images/220a.png (PNG copy)>] [251] [252]
+[253] [254] [255] [256] [257] [258] [259] [260] [261] [262] [263] [264] [265] [
+266] [267] <./images/236a.png, id=1475, 837.1275pt x 961.5925pt>
+File: ./images/236a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/236a.png> [268] <./images/237a.png, id=1480, 889.3225pt x 586.19p
+t>
+File: ./images/237a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/237a.png> [269] [270 <./images/236a.png (PNG copy)>] [271 <./imag
+es/237a.png (PNG copy)>] [272] [273] [274] [275] [276] [277] [278] [279] [280]
+[281] [282] [283] [284] [285] [286
+
+] [287] [288] [289] [290] [291] [292] <./images/256a.png, id=1590, 320.19624pt
+x 316.18124pt>
+File: ./images/256a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/256a.png> [293 <./images/256a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/258a.png
+, id=1597, 437.635pt x 451.6875pt>
+File: ./images/258a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/258a.png> <./images/257a.png, id=1598, 772.8875pt x 1023.825pt>
+File: ./images/257a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/257a.png> <./images/258b.png, id=1599, 283.0575pt x 250.9375pt>
+File: ./images/258b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/258b.png> <./images/258c.png, id=1600, 374.39874pt x 355.3275pt>
+File: ./images/258c.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/258c.png> [294 <./images/258a.png>] [295 <./images/257a.png>] [29
+6 <./images/258b.png> <./images/258c.png>] <./images/260a.png, id=1625, 1027.84
+pt x 995.72pt>
+File: ./images/260a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/260a.png>
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 5.21004pt on input line 9558.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 5.21004pt on input line 9558.
+[297] [298] [299 <./images/260a.png (PNG copy)>] [300] [301] [302] [303] [304]
+[305] [306] [307] [308] [309] [310
+
+] [311] [312] [313] [314] [315] [316] <./images/277a.png, id=1713, 270.00874pt
+x 150.5625pt>
+File: ./images/277a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/277a.png> [317] [318 <./images/277a.png>] [319] [320] [321] [322]
+[323] [324] [325] [326] [327] [328] [329] [330] [331] <./images/289a.png, id=17
+81, 851.18pt x 588.1975pt>
+File: ./images/289a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/289a.png> [332] [333 <./images/289a.png (PNG copy)>] [334] [335]
+[336
+
+] [337] [338] [339] [340] [341] <./images/297a.png, id=1829, 1092.08pt x 1074.0
+125pt>
+File: ./images/297a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/297a.png> [342] [343] [344 <./images/297a.png (PNG copy)>] [345]
+[346] [347] [348] [349] [350] [351] [352] [353] [354] [355] [356] [357] [358] [
+359] [360] [361] [362
+
+] [363] [364] [365] [366] [367] [368] [369] [370] [371] [372] [373] [374] [375]
+[376] [377] [378] [379
+
+] [380] [381] [382] [383] [384] [385] [386] [387] [388] [389] [390] [391] [392]
+[393] [394] [395] [396] [397] <./images/343a.png, id=2074, 634.37pt x 489.83pt>
+File: ./images/343a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/343a.png> [398 <./images/343a.png (PNG copy)>] [399] [400] [401
+
+] [402] [403] [404] [405] [406] [407] [408] [409] [410] [411] [412] <./images/3
+57a.png, id=2146, 431.6125pt x 772.8875pt>
+File: ./images/357a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/357a.png> [413] [414 <./images/357a.png (PNG copy)>] [415] [416]
+[417] [418] [419] [420] [421] [422] [423] [424] [425] [426] [427] [428
+
+] [429] [430] [431] [432] [433] [434] [435] [436] [437] [438] [439] [440] [441]
+[442] [443] [444] [445] [446] [447] [448] [449] [450] [451] [452] [453] [454] [
+455] [456] [457] [458] [459] [460] [461] [462] [463
+
+] [464] [465] [466] [467] [468] [469] [470] [471] [472] [473] [474] [475] [476]
+[477
+
+] [478] [479] [480] [481] [482] [483] [484] (./31428-t.ind [485
+
+
+] [486] [487] [488] [489] [490] [491])
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <10.95> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 15593
+.
+[492
+
+
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <10> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 15624
+.
+[493
+
+] [494]
+Overfull \hbox (7.35703pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15726--15726
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Moti
+on, Rev. ed.,[]
+ []
+
+[495
+
+
+
+] [496]
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15799--15799
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
+ Foundation"[]
+ []
+
+
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15804--15804
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prev
+ent you from[]
+ []
+
+
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15809--15809
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with
+the terms of[]
+ []
+
+[497] [498]
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15872--15872
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gut
+enberg.org),[]
+ []
+
+[499] [500] [501] [502] [503] [504] [505] (./31428-t.aux)
+
+ *File List*
+ book.cls 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+ bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+inputenc.sty 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ ifthen.sty 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+ amsmath.sty 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+ amstext.sty 2000/06/29 v2.01
+ amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+ amsbsy.sty 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+ amsopn.sty 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+ amssymb.sty 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+amsfonts.sty 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+ alltt.sty 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+ array.sty 2005/08/23 v2.4b Tabular extension package (FMi)
+mathpazo.sty 2005/04/12 PSNFSS-v9.2a Palatino w/ Pazo Math (D.Puga, WaS)
+ yfonts.sty 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+ perpage.sty 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+multicol.sty 2006/05/18 v1.6g multicolumn formatting (FMi)
+ makeidx.sty 2000/03/29 v1.0m Standard LaTeX package
+ caption.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+caption3.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+ keyval.sty 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+graphicx.sty 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+graphics.sty 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+ trig.sty 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+ wrapfig.sty 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+textcomp.sty 2005/09/27 v1.99g Standard LaTeX package
+ ts1enc.def 2001/06/05 v3.0e (jk/car/fm) Standard LaTeX file
+indentfirst.sty 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+textcase.sty 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+ calc.sty 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+fancyhdr.sty
+geometry.sty 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+geometry.cfg
+hyperref.sty 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+ pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+kvoptions.sty 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (HO
+)
+ url.sty 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+ hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+ ts1cmr.fd 1999/05/25 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions
+ ot1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for OT1/pplj.
+ragged2e.sty 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+everysel.sty 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+supp-pdf.tex
+ color.sty 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+ color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ nameref.sty 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+refcount.sty 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+ 31428-t.out
+ 31428-t.out
+ ot1ppl.fd 2001/06/04 font definitions for OT1/ppl.
+ omlzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OML/zplm.
+ omszplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMS/zplm.
+ omxzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMX/zplm.
+ ot1zplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OT1/zplm.
+ ts1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for TS1/pplj.
+./images/048a.png
+./images/049a.png
+./images/052a.png
+./images/113a.png
+./images/114a.png
+./images/121a.png
+./images/129a.png
+./images/150a.png
+./images/151a.png
+./images/154a.png
+./images/167a.png
+./images/171a.png
+./images/174a.png
+./images/175a.png
+./images/175b.png
+./images/188a.png
+./images/190a.png
+./images/192a.png
+./images/213a.png
+./images/216a.png
+./images/216b.png
+./images/216c.png
+./images/218a.png
+./images/218b.png
+./images/220a.png
+./images/236a.png
+./images/237a.png
+./images/256a.png
+./images/258a.png
+./images/257a.png
+./images/258b.png
+./images/258c.png
+./images/260a.png
+./images/277a.png
+./images/289a.png
+./images/297a.png
+./images/343a.png
+./images/357a.png
+ 31428-t.ind
+ ***********
+
+ )
+Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
+ 6953 strings out of 94074
+ 93655 string characters out of 1165153
+ 149903 words of memory out of 1500000
+ 9289 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+50000
+ 66939 words of font info for 162 fonts, out of 1200000 for 2000
+ 645 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
+ 34i,12n,46p,270b,495s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,6000p,200000b,5000s
+{/usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/enc/dvips/base/8r.enc}</usr/share/texmf-texli
+ve/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/blues
+ky/cm/cmss12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmss17.pfb></
+usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-tex
+live/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmtt8.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/pub
+lic/mathpazo/fplmri.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/fpl/fplrc8
+a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/fpl/fplrij8a.pfb></usr/share
+/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/urw/palatino/uplb8a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fo
+nts/type1/urw/palatino/uplr8a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/urw/pal
+atino/uplri8a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/gothic/ygoth.pfb
+>
+Output written on 31428-t.pdf (518 pages, 1983992 bytes).
+PDF statistics:
+ 3245 PDF objects out of 3580 (max. 8388607)
+ 730 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 131072)
+ 415 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)
+
diff --git a/31428-t/images/048a.png b/31428-t/images/048a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..284f014
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/048a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/049a.png b/31428-t/images/049a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0edcf13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/049a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/052a.png b/31428-t/images/052a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8e93e1f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/052a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/113a.png b/31428-t/images/113a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8e8abf1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/113a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/114a.png b/31428-t/images/114a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fb4a2d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/114a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/121a.png b/31428-t/images/121a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8000bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/121a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/129a.png b/31428-t/images/129a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..596311e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/129a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/150a.png b/31428-t/images/150a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..56bc2be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/150a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/151a.png b/31428-t/images/151a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0a83551
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/151a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/154a.png b/31428-t/images/154a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1b139bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/154a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/167a.png b/31428-t/images/167a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..432c49a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/167a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/171a.png b/31428-t/images/171a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3b8f2f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/171a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/174a.png b/31428-t/images/174a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d504800
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/174a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/175a.png b/31428-t/images/175a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..399bec2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/175a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/175b.png b/31428-t/images/175b.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e32e3cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/175b.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/188a.png b/31428-t/images/188a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d25afe8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/188a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/190a.png b/31428-t/images/190a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7abe3c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/190a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/192a.png b/31428-t/images/192a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7627a5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/192a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/213a.png b/31428-t/images/213a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..16b7ecd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/213a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/216a.png b/31428-t/images/216a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1f15db3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/216a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/216b.png b/31428-t/images/216b.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..14336d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/216b.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/216c.png b/31428-t/images/216c.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d402638
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/216c.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/218a.png b/31428-t/images/218a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..73be841
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/218a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/218b.png b/31428-t/images/218b.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2f85c0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/218b.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/220a.png b/31428-t/images/220a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e89e9a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/220a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/236a.png b/31428-t/images/236a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ab593e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/236a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/237a.png b/31428-t/images/237a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c994d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/237a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/256a.png b/31428-t/images/256a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d5eeee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/256a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/257a.png b/31428-t/images/257a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7051253
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/257a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/258a.png b/31428-t/images/258a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e4e17ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/258a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/258b.png b/31428-t/images/258b.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0be54ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/258b.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/258c.png b/31428-t/images/258c.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..73bb4a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/258c.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/260a.png b/31428-t/images/260a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0a7e008
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/260a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/277a.png b/31428-t/images/277a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d81f305
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/277a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/289a.png b/31428-t/images/289a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..40ebd3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/289a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/297a.png b/31428-t/images/297a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8f8475e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/297a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/343a.png b/31428-t/images/343a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..84fbdc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/343a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/images/357a.png b/31428-t/images/357a.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b754f97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/images/357a.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/31428-t/old/31428-t.tex b/31428-t/old/31428-t.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ef5bba7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/old/31428-t.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,17081 @@
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl., by
+% Amos Emerson Dolbear %
+% %
+% This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with %
+% almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or %
+% re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included %
+% with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org %
+% %
+% %
+% Title: Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl. %
+% The Factors and Relations of Physical Science %
+% %
+% Author: Amos Emerson Dolbear %
+% %
+% Release Date: February 27, 2010 [EBook #31428] %
+% %
+% Language: English %
+% %
+% Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 %
+% %
+% *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION *** %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\def\ebook{31428}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%% %%
+%% Packages and substitutions: %%
+%% %%
+%% book: Required. %%
+%% inputenc: Standard DP encoding. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% ifthen: Logical conditionals. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% amsmath: AMS mathematics enhancements. Required. %%
+%% amssymb: Additional mathematical symbols. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% alltt: Fixed-width font environment. Required. %%
+%% array: Enhanced tabular features. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% mathpazo: Postscript fonts. Required. %%
+%% yfonts: Gothic font on title page. Optional. %%
+%% %%
+%% perpage: Start footnote numbering on each page. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% multicol: Multi-column environment for index. Required. %%
+%% makeidx: Indexing capabilities. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% caption: More flexible figure caption styles. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% graphicx: Standard interface for graphics inclusion. Required. %%
+%% wrapfig: Illustrations surrounded by text. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% indentfirst: Indent first word of each sectional unit. Optional. %%
+%% textcase: Apply \MakeUppercase (et al.) only to text, not math. %%
+%% Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% calc: Length calculations. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% fancyhdr: Enhanced running headers and footers. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% geometry: Enhanced page layout package. Required. %%
+%% hyperref: Hypertext embellishments for pdf output. Required. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Producer's Comments: %%
+%% %%
+%% Changes are noted in this file in three ways. %%
+%% 1. \DPnote{} for questionable but unchanged items. %%
+%% 2. \DPtypo{}{} for typographical corrections, showing %%
+%% original and replacement text side-by-side. %%
+%% 3. [** PP: Note]s for other comments. %%
+%% %%
+%% The original index contains entries out of alphabetical order, %%
+%% as well as entries seemingly pointing to the wrong page. %%
+%% %%
+%% In this ebook, \index macros are generally placed immediately %%
+%% following the page separator for the folio of the original %%
+%% index entry. A relatively large number of index hyperlinks in %%
+%% this ebook may, as a result, point to an incorrect location, %%
+%% off by more than half a page. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compilation Flags: %%
+%% %%
+%% The following behavior may be controlled by boolean flags. %%
+%% %%
+%% ForPrinting (false by default): %%
+%% Compile a screen-optimized PDF file. Set to false for print- %%
+%% optimized file (pages cropped, one-sided, blue hyperlinks). %%
+%% %%
+%% ShowOriginalFolios (false by default): %%
+%% Compile marginal notes showing folio numbers in the original %%
+%% printed book. May show only notes in the right margin in the %%
+%% screen-optimized version. %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Things to Check: %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Spellcheck: .................................. OK %%
+%% Smoothreading pool: ......................... yes %%
+%% %%
+%% lacheck: ..................................... OK %%
+%% Numerous false positives %%
+%% %%
+%% PDF pages: 518 (if ForPrinting set to false) %%
+%% PDF page size: 4.5 x 7" %%
+%% PDF bookmarks: created %%
+%% PDF document info: filled in %%
+%% Images: 38 png files %%
+%% %%
+%% Summary of log file: %%
+%% * One overfull hbox (0.2pt too wide). %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% Compile History: %%
+%% %%
+%% February, 2010: adhere (Andrew D. Hwang) %%
+%% texlive2007, GNU/Linux %%
+%% %%
+%% Command block: %%
+%% %%
+%% pdflatex x3 (Run pdflatex three times) %%
+%% makeindex -r %%
+%% pdflatex %%
+%% %%
+%% %%
+%% February 2010: pglatex. %%
+%% Compile this project with: %%
+%% pdflatex 31428-t.tex ..... THREE times %%
+%% makeindex -r 31428-t.idx %%
+%% pdflatex 31428-t.tex %%
+%% %%
+%% pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) %%
+%% %%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\listfiles
+\documentclass[12pt]{book}[2005/09/16]
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% PACKAGES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}[2006/05/05]
+
+\usepackage{ifthen}[2001/05/26] %% Logical conditionals
+
+\usepackage{amsmath}[2000/07/18] %% Displayed equations
+\usepackage{amssymb}[2002/01/22] %% and additional symbols
+
+\usepackage{alltt}[1997/06/16] %% boilerplate, credits, license
+
+\usepackage{array}[2005/08/23] %% extended array/tabular features
+
+\usepackage[osf]{mathpazo}[2005/04/12]
+
+% Define \textgoth
+\IfFileExists{yfonts.sty}%
+{\usepackage{yfonts}[2003/01/08]} % fraktur font (titlepage only)
+{\providecommand{\textgoth}[1]{\textbf{##1}}} % fallback if no yfonts
+
+\usepackage{perpage}[2006/07/15] %% extended footnote capabilities
+
+\usepackage{multicol}[2006/05/18]
+\usepackage{makeidx}[2000/03/29]
+
+\usepackage[font={sc,scriptsize}]{caption}[2007/01/07]
+\usepackage{graphicx}[1999/02/16]%% For diagrams
+\usepackage{wrapfig}[2003/01/31] %% and wrapping text around them
+
+\usepackage{textcomp}[2005/09/27]
+\usepackage{indentfirst}[1995/11/23]
+\usepackage{textcase}[2004/10/07]
+
+\usepackage{calc}[2005/08/06]
+
+% for running heads
+\usepackage{fancyhdr}
+
+\newcommand{\Titleskip}[1]{#1\TmpLen}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% Interlude: Set up PRINTING (default) or SCREEN VIEWING %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+% ForPrinting=true (default) false
+% Asymmetric margins Symmetric margins
+% Black hyperlinks Blue hyperlinks
+% Start Preface, ToC, etc. recto No blank verso pages
+%
+% Chapter-like ``Sections'' start both recto and verso in the scanned
+% book. This behavior has been retained.
+\newboolean{ForPrinting}
+\newboolean{ShowOriginalFolios}
+
+%% UNCOMMENT the next line for a PRINT-OPTIMIZED VERSION of the text %%
+%\setboolean{ForPrinting}{true}
+
+%% UNCOMMENT the line below to add marginal notes showing original
+%% folio numbers (if ForPrinting=false, only marginal notes in the
+%% right margin are printed)
+%\setboolean{ShowOriginalFolios}{true}
+
+%% Initialize values to ForPrinting=false
+\newcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=1:1} % Symmetric margins
+\newcommand{\HLinkColor}{blue} % Hyperlink color
+\newcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{SinglePage}
+\newcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+\newcommand{\TransNoteCommon}{%
+ Minor typographical corrections and presentational changes have been
+ made without comment. Illustrations may have been moved slightly
+ relative to the surrounding text.
+ \smallskip
+
+ Aside from clear misspellings, every effort has been made to
+ preserve variations of spelling and hyphenation from the original.
+ \bigskip
+}
+
+\newcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for screen viewing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for printing. Please see the preamble of the \LaTeX\
+ source file for instructions.
+}
+%% Re-set if ForPrinting=true
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \renewcommand{\Margins}{hmarginratio=2:3} % Asymmetric margins
+ \renewcommand{\HLinkColor}{black} % Hyperlink color
+ \renewcommand{\PDFPageLayout}{TwoPageRight}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNote}{Transcriber's Note}
+ \renewcommand{\TransNoteText}{%
+ \TransNoteCommon
+
+ This PDF file is optimized for printing, but may easily be
+ recompiled for screen viewing. Please see the preamble of the
+ \LaTeX\ source file for instructions.
+ }
+}{% If ForPrinting=false, don't skip to recto
+ \renewcommand{\cleardoublepage}{\clearpage}
+}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%%%% End of PRINTING/SCREEN VIEWING code; back to packages %%%%
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in}%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}%
+}{%
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ShowOriginalFolios}}{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{5in}%
+ }{%
+ \setlength{\paperwidth}{4.5in}%
+ }%
+ \setlength{\paperheight}{7in}%
+}
+
+%\usepackage[body={4.25in,5.67in},\Margins]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+\usepackage[body={4.25in,5.7in},\Margins]{geometry}[2002/07/08]
+
+\providecommand{\ebook}{00000} % Overridden during white-washing
+\usepackage[pdftex,
+ hyperfootnotes=false,
+ pdftitle={The Project Gutenberg eBook \#\ebook: Matter, Ether, and Motion},
+ pdfauthor={Amos E. Dolbear},
+ pdfkeywords={Andrew D. Hwang, Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif,
+ Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team},
+ pdfstartview=Fit, % default value
+ pdfstartpage=1, % default value
+ pdfpagemode=UseNone, % default value
+ bookmarks=true, % default value
+ linktocpage=false, % default value
+ pdfpagelayout=\PDFPageLayout,
+ pdfdisplaydoctitle,
+ pdfpagelabels=true,
+ bookmarksopen=true,
+ bookmarksopenlevel=1,
+ colorlinks=true,
+ linkcolor=\HLinkColor]{hyperref}[2007/02/07]
+
+% Re-crop screen-formatted version, accommodating wide displays
+\ifthenelse{\not\boolean{ForPrinting}}{%
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ShowOriginalFolios}}{%
+ \hypersetup{pdfpagescrop= 0 20 545 800}%
+ }{%
+ \hypersetup{pdfpagescrop= 0 20 527 800}%
+ }%
+}%
+
+
+%%%% Fixed-width environment to format PG boilerplate %%%%
+% Size leaves no overfull hbox at 72 char line width
+\newenvironment{PGtext}{%
+\begin{alltt}
+\fontsize{8}{10.5}\ttfamily\selectfont}%
+{\end{alltt}}
+
+%% No hrule in page header
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
+
+%% Adjust line spacing
+\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.1}
+\raggedbottom
+\setlength{\headheight}{15pt}
+
+% Top-level footnote numbers restart on each page
+\MakePerPage{footnote}
+
+\newcommand{\ToCFont}{\normalfont\scshape}
+\newcommand{\Heading}{\normalfont\large}
+
+\makeatletter
+% Dotted lines to chapters in toc
+\renewcommand{\l@chapter}{\@dottedtocline{0}{0em}{3.5em}}
+\renewcommand{\@dotsep}{12}
+% Redefine figure caption
+\renewcommand{\fnum@figure}[1]{}
+\makeatother
+
+% Running heads
+\newcommand{\SetRunningHeads}[2]{%
+ \fancyhead{}
+ \setlength{\headheight}{15pt}
+ % \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \fancyhead[CE]{\normalfont\footnotesize #1}
+ \fancyhead[CO]{\normalfont\footnotesize \MakeUppercase{#2}}
+
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ForPrinting}}
+ {\fancyhead[RO,LE]{\thepage}}
+ {\fancyhead[R]{\thepage}}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\ToCBox}[1]{%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][r]{\protect\scshape#1}
+}
+
+% ToC line for generic chapter; \TmpLen set by \Chapter
+\newcommand{\SetContentsLine}[2]{%
+ \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{%
+ \protect\texorpdfstring{%
+ \protect\ToCBox{#1.} \protect\scshape #2}{#1. #2}%
+ }
+}
+
+%\Chapter[PDF name]{Number}{Heading title}{Folio number}
+\newcommand{\Chapter}[4][]{%
+ \clearpage
+ \phantomsection
+ \null% [** PP: Add some vertical space above the heading]
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#2}{I}}{%
+ \thispagestyle{plain}%
+ \section*{\centering\normalfont\Large MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION\break
+ \tb[1.5in]\break
+ \Heading CHAPTER #2\rule[-16pt]{0pt}{16pt}\break%
+ {\normalsize\bfseries #3}}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{%
+ \protect\vspace*{-24pt}%
+ \protect\scriptsize\protect\noindent CHAPTER\protect\hfill PAGE}
+ \addtocontents{toc}{}%
+ \addtocontents{toc}{%
+ \protect\footnotesize%
+ \protect\settowidth{\protect\TmpLen}{\protect\ToCFont XIII.}}
+ }{%
+ \section*{\centering\Heading%
+ CHAPTER #2\rule[-16pt]{0pt}{16pt}\break%
+ {\normalsize\bfseries #3}}
+ }
+
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}{% Need to pass alt. title to texorpdfstring?
+ \SetContentsLine{#2}{#3}%
+ \SetRunningHeads{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}{#3}
+ }{%
+ \SetContentsLine{#2}{#1}%
+ \SetRunningHeads{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}{#1}
+ }%
+
+ \DPPageSep{}{#4}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Section}[1]
+ {\subsection*{\normalfont\small\centering #1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Subsection}[1]
+ {\subsection*{\normalfont\normalsize\itshape\centering #1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Preface}[1]{%
+ \clearpage
+ \fancyhf{}
+ \cleardoublepage
+ \phantomsection
+ \null %[** PP: Add some vertical space above the heading]
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+ \section*{\centering\normalfont\normalsize #1\break\tb[0.5in]}
+
+ \SetRunningHeads{#1}{#1}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Appendix}{%
+ \clearpage
+ \phantomsection
+ \null %[** PP: Add some vertical space above the heading]
+ \section*{\centering\normalfont\normalsize APPENDIX\break\tb[0.5in]}
+
+ \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{\texorpdfstring{\protect\ToCBox{} Appendix}{Appendix}}
+ \SetRunningHeads{APPENDIX}{APPENDIX}
+ \thispagestyle{plain}
+}
+
+\newcommand{\AppendixRef}[1]{%
+ \hfill\nobreak\null\nopagebreak[4]%
+ \break\null\hfill{\scriptsize#1}\hspace*{1em}\medskip%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\AppendixCite}[2]{%
+ \AppendixRef{\textsc{#1} \textit{#2}}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\AppendixCitePage}[3]{%
+ \AppendixRef{\textsc{#1} \textit{#2} #3}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Note}[1]
+ {\subsection*{\normalfont\footnotesize\centering\scshape#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Cite}[2]{\break\null\hfill\textsc{#1} \textit{#2}\quad\par\medskip}
+
+
+\DeclareMathSizes{12}{11}{9}{8}
+
+\newcommand{\First}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
+
+% For corrections.
+\newcommand{\DPtypo}[2]{#2}
+\newcommand{\DPnote}[1]{}
+
+% \PadTo[#1]{#2}{#3} sets #3 in a box of width #2, aligned at #1 (default [c])
+% Examples: \PadTo{feet per sec.}{\Ditto}, \PadTo{The value is}{2.}
+\newlength{\TmpLen}
+\newcommand{\PadTo}[3][c]{%
+ \settowidth{\TmpLen}{$#2$}%
+ \makebox[\TmpLen][#1]{$#3$}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Ditto}{\raisebox{1ex}{\textquotestraightdblbase}}
+\newcommand{\tb}[1][0.75in]{\rule{#1}{0.5pt}}
+\newcommand{\TBskip}{\bigskip}
+\newcommand{\TableFont}{\footnotesize}
+\newcommand{\Z}{\phantom{0}}
+
+\newcommand{\stretchyspace}{\spaceskip0.5em plus 0.5em minus 0.3em}
+
+\DeclareInputText{176}{\ifmmode{{}^\circ}\else\textdegree\fi}
+\DeclareInputText{183}{\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi}
+
+% ToC formatting
+\AtBeginDocument{%
+ \renewcommand{\contentsname}{%
+ \thispagestyle{empty}%
+ \centering\normalfont\large CONTENTS\\\tb%
+ }
+ \renewcommand{\figurename}{}
+}
+
+% Cross-referencing: anchors
+\newcommand{\Pagelabel}[1]
+ {\phantomsection\label{page:#1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Figlabel}[1]
+ {\phantomsection\label{fig:#1}}
+
+% and links
+\newcommand{\Pageref}[2]{%
+ \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}%
+ {\hyperref[page:#2]{\pageref{page:#2}}}
+ {\hyperref[page:#2]{#1~\pageref{page:#2}}}%
+}
+
+\newcommand{\Chapref}[2]{\hyperref[chapter:#2]{#1~#2}}
+
+%%%% Page numbers of original %%%%
+\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.375in}
+\setlength{\marginparsep}{8pt}
+\newcommand{\DPPageSep}[2]{%
+ \ifthenelse{\boolean{ShowOriginalFolios}}{%
+ \ifthenelse{\not\equal{#2}{unnumbered}}{%
+ \marginpar[\flushright\scriptsize p.~#2]{\scriptsize p.~#2}%
+ }{}%
+ }{}%
+}
+
+%%%% Illustrations and decorations %%%%
+\newcommand{\Graphic}[2]{\includegraphics[width=#1]{./images/#2.png}}
+\captionsetup{justification=centering,%
+ aboveskip=-6pt,%
+ labelformat=empty}
+
+\newcommand{\Caption}[2]{\Figlabel{#1}\caption{#2}}
+
+\newcommand{\BLS}{1}
+\newenvironment{Quote}{%
+ \medskip\par\small\linespread{0.875}\selectfont%
+ \spaceskip0.5em plus 0.5em minus 0.25em%
+}{%
+ \medskip\par\linespread{\BLS}\normalsize%
+ \stretchyspace%
+}
+
+% Macros for the catalogue (final two pages)
+\newlength{\QUAD}
+\setlength{\QUAD}{1em}
+
+\newcommand{\Entry}[1]
+ {\bigskip\par\noindent\hangindent3\QUAD\textbf{\small #1}}
+
+\newcommand{\Subentry}{\par\medskip\noindent\hspace*{\QUAD}\hangindent2\QUAD\footnotesize}
+
+\newenvironment{Descrip}{%
+ \medskip\par\linespread{1}%
+ \scriptsize%
+}{\par%
+ \linespread{\BLS}\normalsize%
+}
+
+% Author, Title, and Price
+\newcommand{\Au}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% INDEX %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\makeatletter
+\renewcommand{\@idxitem}{\par\hangindent 24\p@\global\let\idxbrk\nobreak}
+\renewcommand{\subitem}{\idxbrk\@idxitem \hspace*{12\p@}\let\idxbrk\relax}
+\renewcommand{\indexspace}{\par\penalty-3000 \vskip 10pt plus5pt minus3pt\relax}
+
+\renewenvironment{theindex}{%
+ \setlength\columnseprule{0.5pt}%
+ \setlength\columnsep{12pt}%
+ \begin{multicols}{2}[\begin{center}\Large INDEX\\\tb\end{center}]%
+ \footnotesize%
+ \setlength\parindent{0pt}%
+ \setlength\parskip{0pt plus 0.3pt}%
+ \thispagestyle{plain}%
+ \let\item\@idxitem\raggedright }
+ {\end{multicols}\clearpage\normalsize\fancyhead{}\cleardoublepage}
+\makeatother
+\newcommand\IndexBookmark{%
+ \phantomsection%
+ \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{\texorpdfstring{\protect\ToCBox{} Index}{Index}}
+ \SetRunningHeads{INDEX}{INDEX}
+}
+
+% Miscellaneous extra formatting for individual entries
+\newcommand{\etseq}[1]{\hyperpage{#1} \protect\textit{et~seq.}}
+\renewcommand{\see}[2]{\textit{See} #1}
+
+\makeindex
+
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\pagestyle{empty}
+\pagenumbering{Alph}
+
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Front Matter}{Front Matter}
+
+%%%% PG BOILERPLATE %%%%
+\Pagelabel{PGBoilerplate}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG Boilerplate}{Project Gutenberg Boilerplate}
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\small
+\begin{PGtext}
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl., by
+Amos Emerson Dolbear
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed., enl.
+ The Factors and Relations of Physical Science
+
+Author: Amos Emerson Dolbear
+
+Release Date: February 27, 2010 [EBook #31428]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION ***
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+
+\clearpage
+
+
+%%%% Credits and transcriber's note %%%%
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
+\begin{PGtext}
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+\end{PGtext}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+
+\begin{minipage}{0.85\textwidth}
+\small
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Transcriber's Note}{Transcriber's Note}
+\subsection*{\centering\normalfont\scshape%
+\normalsize\MakeLowercase{\TransNote}}%
+
+\raggedright
+\TransNoteText
+\end{minipage}
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FRONT MATTER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\DPPageSep{001.png}{unnumbered}%
+\clearpage
+\null
+\vfill
+\begin{center}
+\setlength{\fboxsep}{12pt}
+\framebox{%
+\begin{minipage}{3in}%[** Hard-coded width]
+\begin{center}
+\textgoth{By Professor A.~E. Dolbear} \\
+\tb[0.5in]
+\end{center}
+
+\textit{\footnotesize MATTER, ETHER AND MOTION}
+\smallskip
+
+\hspace*{\QUAD}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth-2\QUAD}
+\scriptsize
+The Factors and Relations of Physical Science \\
+Enlarged Edition\quad Cloth\quad Illustrated\quad \$2.00
+\end{minipage}
+
+\medskip
+\textit{\footnotesize THE TELEPHONE}
+\smallskip
+
+\hspace*{\QUAD}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth-2\QUAD}
+\scriptsize
+With directions for making a Speaking Telephone \\
+Illustrated\quad 50~cents
+\end{minipage}
+
+\medskip
+\textit{\footnotesize THE ART OF PROJECTING}
+\smallskip
+
+\hspace*{\QUAD}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth-2\QUAD}
+\scriptsize
+A Manual of Experimentation in Physics, Chemistry,
+and Natural History, with the Porte Lumière
+and Magic Lantern \\
+New Edition\quad Revised\quad Illustrated\quad \$2.00
+\end{minipage}
+
+\begin{center}
+\tb[0.5in]\\
+\textgoth{\footnotesize Lee and Shepard Publishers Boston}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}}
+\end{center}
+\vfill
+
+\DPPageSep{002.png}{unnumbered}% i
+% title page
+\frontmatter
+\pagestyle{empty}
+
+\setlength{\TmpLen}{0.125in}%
+
+\begin{center}
+{\LARGE \scshape Matter, Ether, and Motion} \\[\Titleskip{4}]
+{\itshape THE FACTORS AND RELATIONS \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+OF\\[\Titleskip{1}]
+PHYSICAL SCIENCE}\\[\Titleskip{4}]
+{\scriptsize\upshape BY} \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+{\scshape A.~E. DOLBEAR Ph.D.}
+\medskip
+
+\tiny\upshape PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS TUFTS COLLEGE \\
+AUTHOR OF ``THE TELEPHONE'' ``THE ART OF PROJECTING'' ETC.
+
+\vspace*{4\TmpLen}
+{\scriptsize\itshape REVISED EDITION, ENLARGED}
+\vspace*{4\TmpLen}
+
+\small B\,O\,S\,T\,O\,N %[** PP: One-off gesperrt]
+
+LEE\quad AND\quad SHEPARD\quad PUBLISHERS
+\smallskip
+
+\scriptsize 10 MILK STREET
+
+\small 1894
+\end{center}
+
+\DPPageSep{003.png}{unnumbered}% ii
+% copyright page
+\clearpage
+\begin{center}
+\scriptsize
+\null\vfill
+\scshape Copyright, 1892, 1894, by Lee and Shepard \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+\itshape All Rights Reserved \\[\Titleskip{1}]
+\scshape Matter, Ether, and Motion
+\vfill
+C.~J. Peters \& Son, \\
+Type-Setters and Electrotypers, \\
+145 High Street, Boston.
+\end{center}
+
+\clearpage
+\pagestyle{fancy}
+\fancyfoot{}
+
+\stretchyspace
+
+\Preface{PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION}
+\DPPageSep{004.png}{iii}%
+
+\First{The} issue of a new edition of this book gives me an
+opportunity to make some needed corrections, and enlarge
+it by the addition of three new chapters, which
+I hope will make it more useful to such as have a taste
+for fundamental physical problems. The first of these,
+Properties of Matter as Modes of Motion, presents
+the evidence that all the characteristic properties of
+matter are due to energy embodied in various forms
+of motion. The second, on The Implications of
+Physical Phenomena, points out what assumptions
+are made in explaining phenomena. It is the substance
+of a series of articles published in the \textit{Psychical
+Review} in 1892 and~1893. The third, on The Relations
+between Physical and Psychical Phenomena,
+was read as a paper before the Psychical Congress at
+the World's Fair in August,~1893.
+
+Judging from some of the comments made about my
+statements as to Modern Geometry on \Pageref{page}{57}, and
+as to Vital Force, \Pageref{p.}{279}, I have thought it would be
+useful to some to see corroboratory statements; and I
+have therefore added, in an appendix, a few pages of
+\DPPageSep{005.png}{iv}%
+quotations from some of the most eminent mathematicians
+and biologists on these subjects, and from them
+one may judge whether or not my statements are
+correct.
+
+As the work is a treatise on Physics, there is no
+special reason for going beyond it; but if this presentation
+of the subject is any approach to the truth, there
+is an important conclusion to be drawn from it. If the
+ether be the homogeneous and uniform medium it is
+believed with reason to be, then, in the absence of
+what we call matter, no physical change which we call
+a phenomenon could possibly arise in it; for every such
+phenomenon is a product, and in the absence of one of
+the essential factors, viz., matter, it could not be. If
+matter itself be a form of motion of the ether, the ether
+must have existed prior to matter; also, if the atom be a
+form of energy, then must energy have existed before
+matter existed. Hence there must have been some
+other agency radically different from any physical
+energy we know, and independent of everything we
+know, which was capable of producing orderly physical
+phenomena, by acting upon the ether; for a homogeneous
+medium could not originate it. Some philosophers
+call this antecedent power The Unknowable; others call
+it God. If energy \emph{as we know it} implies antecedent
+energy as we do not know it, so, likewise, mind as we
+know it implies antecedent mind under totally different
+conditions from those in which we find it embodied.
+
+In whatever direction one pursues physical science,
+\DPPageSep{006.png}{v}%
+he is at last confronted with a physical phenomenon
+with a superphysical antecedent where all physical
+methods of investigation are impotent. Such considerations
+raise the theistic hypothesis of creation to the
+rank of such physical theories as the nebula theory
+of the origin of the solar system, and the undulatory
+theory of light.
+\DPPageSep{007.png}{unnumbered}% vi
+% [Blank Page]
+
+
+\Preface{PREFACE}
+\DPPageSep{008.png}{vii}%
+
+\First{Within} the past fifty years the advance in physical
+knowledge has not only been rapid, but it has been
+well-nigh revolutionary. Not that knowledge that was
+felt to be well grounded before has been set aside,---for
+it has not been,---but the fundamental principles
+of natural philosophy that were applied by Sir Isaac
+Newton and others to masses of visible magnitude
+have been applied to molecules; and it has thus been
+discovered that all kinds of phenomena are subject to
+the same mechanical laws. It was thought before that
+physics embraced several distinct provinces of knowledge
+which were not necessarily related to each other,
+such as mechanics, heat, electricity, etc. Such terms
+as imponderable matter, latent heat, electric fluid,
+forces of nature, and others in common use in text-books
+and elsewhere, served to maintain the distinctions;
+and even to-day some of these obsolete physical
+agencies are to be met in books and places where one
+would hope not to find them. As all physical phenomena
+are reducible to the principles of mechanics, atoms
+and molecules are subject to them as much as masses
+\DPPageSep{009.png}{viii}%
+of visible magnitude; and it has become apparent that
+however different one phenomenon is from another, the
+factors of both are the same,---matter, ether, and
+motion; so that all the so-called forces of nature,
+considered as objective things controlling phenomena,
+are seen to have no existence; that all phenomena are
+reducible to nothing more mysterious than a push or
+a pull.
+
+Some say that science is simply classified knowledge.
+To the author it is more than that, it is a consistent
+body of knowledge; and a true explanation of any
+phenomenon cannot be inconsistent with the best
+established body of knowledge we have. If physical
+factors are fundamental, then theorizers must square
+their theories to them.
+
+The text-books have not kept pace with the advance
+of knowledge; and there is a large body of persons
+desirous of knowing more of natural philosophy, and
+especially of its trend, who have neither time nor
+opportunity to read and digest monographs on a thousand
+topics. To meet the wants of such, this book has
+been written. It undertakes to present in a systematic
+way the mechanical principles that underlie the phenomena
+in each of the different departments of the
+science, in a readable form, and in an untechnical
+manner. The aim has been to simplify and reduce
+to mechanical conceptions wherever it was possible
+to do so.
+
+One may often hear the question asked, What is
+\DPPageSep{010.png}{ix}%
+electricity? but a similar question as to the nature of
+heat or light or chemism is just as pertinent, although
+there chances now to be less popular interest in these
+than in the former; not, however, because they are in
+themselves better understood, or less interesting.
+
+It is hoped that some of those whose interests lie
+along such special lines as chemistry, electricity, and
+even biology, will find something helpful in the chapters
+dealing with those subjects.
+
+In covering so much ground in so small a treatise, it
+was necessary to select such facts as give prominence
+to fundamental principles. Doubtless others might
+have selected different materials, even with the same
+end in view, for otherwise competent persons are
+generally more familiar with certain details of a given
+science than with others; and I have used what was
+closest at hand.
+
+Aside from the topics usually treated upon in a book
+of physics, the reader will find a chapter on Physical
+Fields, which is unique, as it extends the principle of
+sympathetic action---recognized in acoustics---to the
+whole range of phenomena, including living things.
+
+The chapter on Life, in a treatise on physics, must
+justify itself; while the one on Machines points out
+their functions in a more complete way than has been
+done before.
+
+Lastly, however large the physical universe may be,
+and however exact such relations as we have established
+may be, it is daily becoming more certain that
+\DPPageSep{011.png}{x}%
+even in the physical universe we have to do with a
+factor,---the ether,---the properties of which we vainly
+strive to interpret in terms of matter, the undiscovered
+properties of which ought to warn every one against
+the danger of strongly asserting what is possible and
+what impossible in the nature of things. With the
+electro-magnetic theory of light now just established,
+and the vortex ring theory of matter still \textit{sub~judice},
+but with daily increasing evidence in its favor, one may
+now be sure that matter itself is more wonderful than
+any philosopher ever thought. Its possibilities may
+have been vastly underrated.
+
+In the book called ``The Unseen Universe,'' it is
+pointed out that possibly the ether may be the medium
+through which mind and matter re-act. What fifteen
+years ago was deemed \emph{possible}, is to-day deemed \emph{probable},
+and to-morrow may be demonstrated; and a perusal
+of that book is recommended to persons who are
+interested in questions of that kind.
+\DPPageSep{012.png}{unnumbered}%
+% table of contents
+
+\pagestyle{empty}
+\tableofcontents
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Contents}{Contents}%
+
+
+\iffalse
+
+CONTENTS
+
+CHAPTER PAGE
+
+I. MATTER AND ITS PROPERTIES 1
+
+II. THE ETHER 26
+
+III. MOTION 44
+
+IV. ENERGY 59
+
+V. GRAVITATION 83
+
+VI. HEAT 99
+
+VII. ETHER WAVES 134
+
+VIII. ELECTRICITY 173
+
+IX. CHEMISM 238
+
+X. SOUND 256
+
+XI. LIFE 277
+
+XII. PHYSICAL FIELDS 298
+
+XIII. ON MACHINES.--MECHANISM 312
+
+XIV. PROPERTIES OF MATTER AS MODES OF MOTION 331
+
+XV. IMPLICATIONS OF PHYSICAL PHENOMENA 354
+
+XVI. RELATIONS OF PHYSICAL AND PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA 384
+
+APPENDIX 397
+
+INDEX 403
+
+\fi
+
+%\DPPageSep{013.png}{1}%
+
+\mainmatter
+\pagestyle{fancy}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Main Matter}{Main Matter}
+
+% MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION
+
+
+\Chapter{I}{Matter and Its Properties}{1}
+
+\First{All} kinds of phenomena that we can become conscious
+of through any of our senses are traceable
+directly or indirectly to what we call matter. The
+sense of feeling implies contact with a body of some
+kind; the sense of hearing depends upon movements
+of the air, which is a body of matter having certain
+properties; and the sense of sight, also due to vibratory
+motion, implies that matter exists, however distant,
+which has given rise to the vibratory motions that are
+perceived as light. So of taste and smell, actual contact
+of material particles endowed with particular
+properties are the conditions for exciting these sense
+perceptions. Some philosophers have added a sixth
+sense to the five senses we have recognized for so long
+a time---the sense of weight, as distinguished from the
+sense of touch; and still others have thought to distinguish
+a sense of temperature---relative perceptions of
+heat and cold, from the sense of touch; and if these
+truly represent distinct senses, they illustrate still
+further the truth that it is through the reactions of
+\DPPageSep{014.png}{2}%
+matter upon the nervous organizations of living things
+that all of our knowledge of things about us and of
+the universe as a whole is obtained.
+
+It might seem to one as if our knowledge of matter
+should be tolerably good, accurate, and complete, seeing
+that it is thrust upon us everywhere, and affects us
+for good or evil continuously from the dawn of sensation
+till death; yet it may truly be said that the knowledge
+of matter, its properties, and the wonderful complexity
+of phenomena that are due to them, which we
+possess to-day was wholly unknown to all mankind
+until the time of Sir~Isaac Newton, whose discovery
+of the law of gravitation was the first discovery of
+a universal property of matter; and by far the larger
+part of the knowledge we have, has been acquired in
+this century and mostly within the last half of it. The
+mass of mankind is, as it always has been, without
+any knowledge at all and without any desire for it.
+Whatever we have is due to the work of a small number
+of persons in Western Europe and America. Probably
+the large majority of mankind are quite unable
+to understand phenomena and their significance, yet
+among the brighter and more competent individuals in
+every country there is an apathy and indifference to the
+subject, due, of course, to the estimate they have of its
+degree of importance; and this estimate is in a good
+measure due to the philosophy of things in general
+held by the individual thinkers.
+
+When Mr.\ Emerson was told by a Millenarian that
+the world was coming to an end the next day, he
+declared that he could get along without it, and so it
+\DPPageSep{015.png}{3}%
+probably has seemed to the majority of philosophers
+that the material world was a condition of things to be
+endured, rather than to be understood and utilized:
+that they were in it but were not a part of it.
+
+Knowledge has, however, increased, and the wise
+ones are growing wiser; and some of the modern questions
+of philosophy and psychology are now so woven
+in with physical details that a knowledge of matter and
+its possibilities has become to them imperative.
+
+There have been many attempts to define matter,
+such as, whatever occupies space, or whatever affects
+our senses, and so on; and there is no brief definition
+that has been generally adopted. In the ordinary
+affairs of life one rarely needs to make such distinctions
+as are necessary in philosophical and scientific affairs,
+where accuracy and clearness are of the utmost importance.
+There seems to be no way to define matter
+except by means of some of its properties. If we say
+that it is whatever occupies space, there is implied in
+the statement that the term is properly applicable to
+everything that exists in space; but so far as we know
+there may be any number of things in illimitable space
+that are not subject to any of the physical laws, such as
+a piece of wood or an air particle are known to be controlled
+by. If we say whatever affects our senses, we
+again are going beyond our warrant; for electricity is
+capable of affecting several of our senses,---sight, taste,
+feeling,---and yet there is no good reason for thinking
+electricity to be matter.
+
+There is one property of matter that may seem to
+differentiate it from everything else, and hence, if
+\DPPageSep{016.png}{4}%
+\index{Matter, characteristic property}%
+\index{Matter, its definition}%
+adopted, will enable one to be precise about his use of
+the term. One part of the law of universal gravitation
+is---\emph{every particle of matter in the universe attracts every
+other particle}. This makes gravitation a universal property
+of matter. The astronomers have observed the
+movements of exceedingly distant stars to be in accordance
+with this law, and there are no exceptions to it
+that have been discovered.
+
+If, then, one adopts as the definition of matter, \emph{whatever
+possesses the property of gravitative attraction}, he
+will have a definition that is in accordance with everything
+we know, and with the added advantage that if
+there be anything else in the universe that involves
+observable phenomena he will not need to confuse it
+with the phenomena of gravitative matter. This is the
+sense in which that term is used throughout this book.
+\TBskip
+
+Matter presents itself to our senses in a scale of
+magnitude from particles in the neighborhood of the
+hundred-thousandth part of an inch in diameter, and
+requiring the highest powers of the microscope to see,
+to such huge masses as that of the earth, eight thousand
+miles in diameter, the planet Jupiter, nearly eighty
+thousand miles, and the sun, eight hundred thousand
+miles in diameter, while some of the more distant stars
+are probably ten times larger than the sun. The large
+masses, however, are but collections of smaller ones,
+each particle bringing its own properties of whatever
+kinds they may be; and it does not appear that new
+qualities are developed by simply changing the distance
+between bodies. So the properties of matter may be
+\DPPageSep{017.png}{5}%
+studied exhaustively without employing specimens
+inconveniently large.
+
+The thin stratum of gold spread upon cheap jewelry
+has all the characteristics and qualities of any specimen
+of gold however large; and a small test tube of
+hydrogen will exhibit all the kinds of phenomena that
+any larger quantity would show. For such reasons the
+study of the universe of matter can be carried on in
+the laboratory. The universe may be in the crucible
+one holds in the tongs; whatever difference there may
+seem to be, it will really be one of bigness only.
+
+In treatises on physics one will generally find the
+properties of matter arranged in two divisions, called
+essential properties and non-essential ones. Of the
+former are (1)~extension, or space occupying; (2)~inertia,
+or passiveness under conditions of rest or motion;
+(3)~impenetrability, or total and exclusive occupancy of
+its own space; (4)~elasticity, or ability to recover its
+form after distortion, this, however, varying in degree
+in different bodies; (5)~attraction, of which there are
+several varieties,---gravitation, acting at all distances;
+chemism, acting at close distances and selective in its
+operation, and apparently not existing at all between
+some kinds of matter, as, for instance, between oxygen
+and fluorine. Chemism is also capable of complete
+neutralization, and is thus in marked contrast with
+gravitative attraction, which is not affected in the slightest
+degree discoverable by contiguity; and lastly, cohesion,
+which is not apparent except bodies are in contact,
+but is the agency that holds the particles of bodies together
+so they form liquids and solids of any and all sorts.
+\DPPageSep{018.png}{6}%
+
+The so-called non-essential properties are color, hardness,
+malleability, ductility, and the like, which vary very
+much in different substances. Among the metals silver
+is white, copper is red, gold is yellow. Diamond is the
+hardest substance known, while graphite is one of the
+softest, though both are composed of the same ultimate
+substance---carbon. Iron is malleable, and may be
+forged into any shape. Gold may be hammered out into
+leaves no more than one three-hundred-thousandth of
+an inch thick, but zinc is wholly unmanageable in that
+way. Platinum, one of the heaviest metals we have,
+can be drawn out into a wire finer than a spider's web,---a
+single grain may be drawn into a mile of wire; while
+bismuth, also a metal, cannot be drawn at all.
+
+There are other conditions of matter that offer
+opportunities for convenient grouping sometimes, such
+as the solid, the liquid, and the gaseous: the solid
+being the one where the parts strongly cohere; the
+liquid, where the parts have but slight cohesion; and
+the gaseous, where the individual particles do not
+cohere at all, but, being elastic, bump against each
+other and rebound continually.
+
+Farther on it will be shown how all substances may
+assume either of these conditions, inasmuch as it is
+temperature that determines whether a given substance
+be a solid, a liquid, or a gas.
+
+Density signifies compactness of matter, or the relative
+\index{Density}%
+number of particles in a given unit volume. If compression
+be applied to two cubic feet of common air until
+it occupies but one cubic foot, there is twice as much
+matter in that cubic foot as there was at the outset, and
+\DPPageSep{019.png}{7}%
+we express that fact by saying that the density is
+doubled. If twice the amount of matter is in the unit
+space, evidently the weight of the matter in that space
+must be twice what it was at first. So one may measure
+the density of matter by the weight of a unit
+volume of it compared with the weight of the same
+volume of some other substance taken as unity. Thus,
+if a cubic foot of water weighs $62.5$~pounds, and a cubic
+foot of rock weighs $155$~pounds, the density of the rock
+is~$2\frac{1}{2}$, which means that it is $2\frac{1}{2}$~times heavier than
+water, and that the amount of matter in the rock
+is $2\frac{1}{2}$~times greater than that of the water. Such
+determinations have been made of all the different
+materials that could be found, and extensive tables
+have thus been constructed; but it is seen that the
+appeal is to gravitation, and presumes that every particle
+obeys that law, and that degrees of compactness of
+matter do not affect the law. Such comparative tables,
+based upon gravitation measure, are frequently called
+tables of \emph{Specific Gravity}, so that density and specific
+\index{Gravity, specific}%
+\index{Specific gravity}%
+gravity mean substantially the same thing. The following
+examples of the relative densities of bodies may be
+of interest:---
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular} {ll<{\qquad} ll<{\qquad} ll}
+Gold, & $19$ & Diamond, & $4$ & Alcohol, & $\Z.8$ \\
+Silver, & $10.5$ & Common Stone, & $2.5$ & Ether, & $1.1$ \\
+Copper, & $8.8$ & Wood, & $\Z.8$ & Water, & $1$ \\
+Iron, & $7.8$ & Sulphuric Acid, & $1.8$ & The Earth, & $5.6$
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+Such numbers are to be understood as signifying that
+if a given volume of water weighs one pound, an equal
+volume of gold weighs nineteen pounds, an equal volume
+of iron seven and eight-tenths pounds, and so on.
+\DPPageSep{020.png}{8}%
+
+Sometimes, however, it is convenient to choose for a
+standard of density some body, a small unit volume of
+which is much lighter than water, such as air, or more
+frequently hydrogen gas, a hundred cubic inches of which
+weigh $2.2$~grains. In the metric system, a litre, which
+is nearly two pints is the standard of volume; and a
+litre of hydrogen weighs $.0896$~of a gram.
+
+In chemical work this is the common standard for
+gases; while for solids and liquids a cubic centimetre of
+water is taken, which weighs one gram.
+
+\Section{DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER.}
+\index{Matter, divisibility of}%
+
+Particles of matter as small as the hundred-thousandth
+of an inch may be seen with a good microscope
+as the smallest visible thing, but there is no reason for
+thinking that such a degree of fineness is any approach
+to the ultimate fineness of the parts into which it is
+possible to divide matter. For a long time philosophers
+have considered whether or not there could, in
+the nature of things, be an actual limit to the divisibility
+of matter, so that the smallest fragment could
+not be again divided into two or more parts by the
+application of appropriate means, thus making matter
+infinitely divisible, at any rate ideally.
+
+In Mr.\ Spencer's ``First Principles'' this subject is
+considered at length, and the conclusion reached that it
+is impossible to conceive the existence of real atoms---bodies
+that cannot be divided into halves; nevertheless,
+we shall see presently that it is possible to
+conceive precisely that thing. It will be best here to
+\DPPageSep{021.png}{9}%
+note how far division has been carried and the means
+employed to effect it.
+
+If a bit of phosphorus be put into a solution of gold,
+the gold will be set free in such a finely divided state
+that the particles remain suspended in the solution,
+giving to it a blue, green, or ruby color, depending
+upon the degree of fineness into which it has been
+broken up. Faraday estimated that the particles of
+gold in the ruby-colored liquid did not exceed the five-hundred
+thousandth part of the volume of the liquid.
+One-eighth of a grain of indigo dissolved in sulphuric
+acid will give a distinctly blue color to two and a half
+gallons of water, which would be about the millionth
+part of a grain to a drop of the water.
+
+A grain of musk will keep a room scented for many
+years. During the whole of the time it must be slowly
+evaporating, giving out its particles to the currents of
+air to be wafted presently out of doors; yet in all this
+time the musk seems to lose but little in weight.
+
+The acute sense of smell of the dog is well known;
+for he can detect the track of his master long after the
+tracks have been made, which shows that some slight
+characteristic matter is left at each footfall.
+
+A spider's web is sometimes so delicate that an
+ounce of it would reach three thousand miles, or from
+New York to London. No one would think it likely
+that such a web would be made up of a single row of
+atoms, like a string of beads; for it would not seem
+probable that such a string could have such a degree
+of cohesion as spiders' webs are known to possess.
+
+Chemists have concluded from their experience with
+\DPPageSep{022.png}{10}%
+matter in its various forms and conditions that it is
+really reducible to ultimate particles which have never
+broken up, no matter what conditions they have been
+subject to; and these ultimate particles are called \emph{atoms}.
+\index{Atoms}%
+The term is not now understood to signify what is
+implied in its derivation, as something that cannot be
+divided, only something that has not yet been broken
+up into smaller parts. Thus hydrogen, oxygen, iron,
+silver, are reducible to such ultimate atoms; and there
+are now known about seventy different kinds of
+atoms, and these are often spoken of as the elements.
+Though they are excessively minute when compared
+with ordinary objects of sight, yet they have a real
+magnitude which the physicist has measured in several
+different ways. Most of these methods are complicated,
+and, in order to be understood, require a pretty
+thorough knowledge of molecular physics; but the following
+one may probably serve to give one an idea of
+the degree of smallness which atoms must have.
+
+When a soap-bubble is blown, the material of the
+\index{Soap-bubbles}%
+film slides down the sides, making the bubble thinnest
+on top. When a certain degree of thinness has been
+reached at the top, colors begin to appear in concentric
+rings, and these colors appear to move towards the
+equatorial regions, new rings being formed at the top
+as fast as room is made for them by the displacement
+of the earlier ones. These colors always appear in the
+same order as they are in the rainbow, namely, beginning
+with the red and ending with the violet, then
+another set with the same order, until there have been
+ten or more such sets of rainbow tints. They are
+\DPPageSep{023.png}{11}%
+explained as being due to what is called interference
+in the light waves that fall upon the film. Light is
+reflected more or less from every surface it reaches.
+Some light is reflected from the first or outer surface
+of the film; some goes through the film to the inner
+surface, and is there reflected back to the outer surface,
+and then takes the direction that the light has which
+is reflected from the first surface, so that the light that
+reaches the eye from a point on a bubble comes from
+both outer and inner surfaces. That coming from the
+inner surface has had to travel farther than that coming
+from the outer surface by a distance of twice the
+thickness of the film. As light consists of waves, if
+one set of waves all of a length be made to move in the
+same direction as another set having the same length,
+their crests may coincide and produce a single higher
+wave; or the crest of one may be behind the crest of
+the other at any distance up to one-half the length of
+the wave itself, in which case the crest of one will
+coincide with the trough of the other, and the two
+waves will cancel each other, and this process is called
+interference. Now, in the case of the bubble, when the
+thickness is such that the distance through the film
+and back again is such as to equal half a wave length
+of a given kind of light, that particular wave is extinguished;
+and when one of the constituents of white
+light is wanting, that which is left is seen as colored
+light, and the color seen must depend upon the kind
+of color that has been cancelled. Red light has the
+longest wave length, about one forty-thousandth of an
+inch, and violet, the shortest of the waves we see, about
+\DPPageSep{024.png}{12}%
+one sixty-thousandth of an inch; and when these colors
+are seen upon the bubble we are assured that the
+interferences are produced by thicknesses due to fractional
+parts of such wave lengths. As the ray must go
+through the thickness twice in order to fall behind one-half
+of a wave, it follows that the thickness of the film
+where the last set of colors appear can be no more than
+one-fourth of the wave length of the shortest wave we
+can see, that is,
+\[
+\frac{1}{4} × \frac{1}{60,000} = \frac{1}{240,000} \text{ of an inch.}
+\]
+When a bubble has reached this degree of thinness, so
+that no more colors are to be seen, a rather remarkable
+physical effect may be noticed. The film becomes
+almost jet black, with a jagged edge well defined
+between it and the brighter colored rings where the
+adjacent tint is purplish. The thickness of the film
+has fallen suddenly off here to about one-fortieth of
+the thickness it has where the tint is visible, and the
+bubble breaks in a second or two after this black patch
+appears; that is, when its thinness at any point becomes
+as small as
+\[
+\frac{1}{240,000} × \frac{1}{40} = \frac{1}{9,600000} \text{ of an inch.}
+\]
+As the bubble, however, does persist for a short time,
+and the thin film has cohesion enough to enable it to
+support the weight of the bubble, it seems highly probable,
+but is not absolutely certain, that it must be more
+than one molecule of water thick at the thinnest
+place, which is, as shown, only about the one ten-millionth
+\DPPageSep{025.png}{13}%
+\index{Molecules, size of}%
+of an inch thick. If one thinks it probable that
+it be, say five molecules thick in order to have the
+degree of cohesion it shows, then the size of such\DPnote{** [sic]}
+molecule of water out of which the bubble is made
+can be but the one-fifth of the above small fraction,
+which gives about the one fifty-millionth part of an
+inch as the diameter of a molecule of water.
+
+But a molecule is not the same thing as an atom: it
+is made up of atoms, chemically combined, and is
+defined generally as being the smallest fragment of a
+compound body that can exist and possess the physical
+characteristics that belong to such body. Thus, a drop
+of water possesses all the characteristics of any larger
+quantity of it, and a drop may be divided into smaller
+and smaller globules, perhaps a million of them, each
+one being visible with a good microscope; but if the
+division be carried to a higher degree, as it can be by
+various methods, chemical, electrical, and thermal, the
+qualities of water disappear, and two different substances,
+oxygen and hydrogen, are left, both gaseous
+under all ordinary conditions, and neither of them exhibiting
+any properties like water or from which any
+of the properties of water might be inferred. It may
+be well to remark here that this is only one illustration
+out of multitudes that might be named throughout the
+whole domain of physical science, that the properties
+of things under common observation are not simply
+the properties that belong to the elements out of
+which the things are built up; such properties
+being the result of collocation rather than inherent
+qualities.
+\DPPageSep{026.png}{14}%
+
+The molecule of water is then a compound thing, and
+is made up of three atoms,---two of hydrogen and one
+of oxygen,---and therefore the actual size of an atom
+of hydrogen must be less than that represented by the
+above small fraction of an inch. Evidently a thing
+made up of three individual parts and two dissimilar
+substances cannot be spherical, and it will be well to
+bear this in mind in thinking of molecular forms. One
+may imagine the atoms themselves to be spheres, or
+cubes, or tetrahedra, or rings, or disks, or any other
+forms he likes, for the purpose of getting some sort of
+a mental picture of what a molecule might look like if
+it could be seen with a microscope; and it is probable
+that very many persons have hoped or thought that
+the microscope would sometime be so far perfected as
+to enable one to actually look upon the molecules of
+matter and perhaps upon their individual atoms. Let
+us therefore consider the problem of how much more
+powerful a microscope must need to be than any we
+possess to-day, in order that one should see a molecule!
+We will assume atoms to be about the one fifty-millionth
+of an inch in diameter, and that when combined
+into molecules they are geometrically arranged
+so that the diameter of a molecule made up of a large
+number of atoms is proportional to the cube root of
+the number of atoms, as is the case with larger bodies,
+say a box of bullets.
+
+A molecule of water contains three atoms, a molecule
+of alum about one hundred, while, according to
+Mulder, a molecule of albumen contains nearly a
+thousand atoms. Then, according to the assumption,
+\DPPageSep{027.png}{15}%
+the molecule of alum would have a diameter
+equal to
+\[
+\frac{\sqrt[3]{100}}{50,000000} = \frac{1}{10,776000} \text{ of an inch},
+\]
+and that of albumen would be equal to
+\index{Albumen, size of molecule}%
+\[
+\frac{\sqrt[3]{1,000}}{50,000000} = \frac{1}{5,000000} \text{ of an inch.}
+\]
+
+Now, the best microscopes made to-day will enable
+\index{Microscope, magnifying powers}%
+one to see as barely visible a point the one hundred-thousandth
+of an inch, so that such a microscope would
+need to be as much more powerful than it now is as
+one hundred thousand is contained in five millions, that
+is, fifty times, in order to see the albumen molecule, and
+for the alum molecule as many times as one hundred
+thousand is contained in ten million seven hundred
+thousand, that is, one hundred and seven times. Now,
+one who is familiar with the microscope would probably
+admit that one might be made through improved
+methods of making and working glass hereafter to be
+discovered, two or three, or even ten times better than
+the best we have now; but the idea of one being made
+fifty or one hundred times more powerful than we have
+to-day, I do not think would be allowed to have any
+degree of probability. The case may be illustrated as
+follows: Suppose in the days of the stage-coach
+some one had imagined that by some improvement in
+methods of travelling one might some day travel one
+hundred times faster than the stage-coach could then
+go. Twelve miles an hour was not an uncommon rate
+then; but one hundred times that would be twelve
+\DPPageSep{028.png}{16}%
+hundred miles an hour, and that is sixteen times faster
+than the best we can now do, and about twenty-five
+times faster than express-trains now go. As a matter
+of fact, we travel about three or four times faster than
+the best stage-coaches did, and, on a spurt, may go six
+or eight times faster. The powers of the microscope
+have not been doubled within the last fifty years, and I
+suppose more time and ingenuity have been given to
+the problem of improving it than will ever be given
+to it in the same interval again.
+
+There is another and still more serious reason why
+there is no probability that any one will ever see a
+molecule, even though the microscope had the magnifying
+power sufficient to reveal it; namely, the motions
+that molecules are known to have would absolutely
+prevent one from being seen. A free molecule of
+hydrogen has a velocity of motion at ordinary temperatures
+of upwards of a mile in a second, and its direction
+of motion is changed millions of times in a
+second. A microscope magnifies the movements of an
+object as much as it does the object itself. An object
+in the field of a microscope that should have a movement
+no greater than the hundredth of an inch in a
+second could only be glimpsed, so there is no possibility
+of one's being able ever to see a free gaseous
+molecule. Supposing one should be seized and held in
+the field, even then it is to be remembered that it is in
+a state of vibration, changing its form constantly on
+account of its temperature, so that its wriggling would
+prevent any inspection.
+
+Lastly, there is every reason to believe that the
+\DPPageSep{029.png}{17}%
+molecules of all bodies are so perfectly transparent
+that they can no more be seen than can the air, even
+if there were no difficulty from their smallness and
+their motions.
+
+If the atoms of a single element like hydrogen are
+so minute, so restless, and so transparent that no one
+can hope to see them so as to make out their forms
+and what gives them their characteristic properties,
+what shall be said of the case of seventy or more elements
+similarly minute and restless and transparent,
+yet each one easily identified in several ways, physical
+and chemical? Does it seem in any way probable that
+such differences in properties as are exhibited by gold,
+carbon, iron, and oxygen can be due simply to differences
+in size or shape of the atom? Presumably not;
+and the constitution of matter has therefore always
+been a mystery to philosophers, for if one is to attempt
+to philosophize upon the subject in accordance with
+such other knowledge as we have, one would need to
+conclude that if the different kinds of matter, the elements
+as we know them, were formed out of some
+prior kind of substance, as bullets and marbles are
+formed out of lead and clay, then there must be as
+many different kinds of substances out of which the
+different elementary atoms are formed as there are
+different elements, which proposition does not seem to
+have such a degree of probability that any one could
+adopt it. If one sought for the explanation of the
+different properties by assuming that all the different
+kinds of elements were formed out of one and the
+same fundamental substance, then it is equally difficult
+\DPPageSep{030.png}{18}%
+to understand how mere differences in size and shape
+could give such profound differences in quality as the
+elements possess.
+
+Then, again, it appears that the individual atoms of
+\index{Atoms}%
+each element are precisely alike. One atom of hydrogen
+is precisely like every other atom, so far as we
+have definite knowledge. Sir~John Herschel likened
+them to manufactured articles on account of their
+exact similarity. A machine may turn out buttons or
+hooks or wheels or coins so exactly like one another
+that no one can tell them apart. It is really appalling
+to think of the immense numbers of atoms of every
+one of these seventy elements. It is a simple matter
+to calculate how many atoms there must be in say a
+cubic inch. It requires no other process than the
+application of the multiplication table. If the diameter
+of one be the fifty-millionth of an inch, then fifty
+\index{Molecules, size of}%
+million in a row would reach an inch, and a cubic
+inch would contain the number represented by the
+cube of fifty millions, which is
+\[
+125000,000000,000000,000000,
+\]
+($125$~followed by twenty-one ciphers) a number which
+is more conveniently represented by $125 × 10^{21}$. The
+utter impossibility of conceiving such a number will
+be apparent if one would try to represent to himself
+what the magnitude of only one million really is. Go
+out on a clear but moonless night and the heavens
+appear to be filled with stars. Count all that can be
+\index{Stars, their number}%
+seen in a certain portion of the sky, say one-tenth, as
+nearly as can be estimated, and then determine the
+\DPPageSep{031.png}{19}%
+number in the sky that are in sight by multiplication.
+It will be discovered that only about two thousand can
+be seen in the whole sky. If one million stars were to
+be thus visible, it would require five hundred firmaments
+as large and as well filled as the one looked at
+to contain them. With the largest telescopes less than
+a hundred millions of stars are visible; but what shall
+one say when he learns that beyond a peradventure
+the number of atoms in a single cubic inch of matter
+\index{Atoms}%
+of any sort is more than a million of millions times
+all the stars in all the heavens visible in the largest
+telescope.
+
+If one fancies that kind of work he may compute
+the number of atoms that make up the world. Of
+course it will make the number much larger; but when
+written out not so much longer as one might think, for
+when it is multiplied a million times it will add but six
+ciphers to it. Some mathematicians have been to the
+pains to compute the number of atoms there are in the
+visible universe, or, rather, the number that cannot be
+exceeded; for if the number stated above fills a cubic
+inch, if one knows the diameter of the visible universe,
+the space it occupies can readily be known in cubic
+miles and cubic inches, and if all this space was filled
+with atoms one could know and write down their number.
+Astronomers tell us that some stars are so distant
+\index{Stars, their distance}%
+that their light requires as long as five thousand
+years to reach us, although the velocity of light is as
+great as $186,000$ miles in a second, and this distance is
+to be measured in every direction about us. If this be
+our visible universe, then the maximum number of
+\DPPageSep{032.png}{20}%
+\index{Universe, atoms in}%
+atoms in it are calculable, and are stated to be represented
+by the figure 6 followed by ninety-one ciphers,
+or, as it is usually written,
+\[
+6 × 10^{91}.
+\]
+
+If we return to microscopic dimensions, and compute
+the number of atoms, there will be in the smallest
+amount of matter that can be seen with the highest
+powers of the microscope, the one hundred-thousandth
+of an inch, it will be seen that five hundred atoms in
+a row would just reach the distance; and the cube of
+$500$ is $125,000,000$, that could be contained in a space
+so small as to appear like a vanishing-point and the
+structure or details be utterly invisible. We have read
+of spirits that could dance upon the point of a needle,
+but the point of a needle would be a huge platform
+when compared with this last visible point with the
+microscope; and the spirit that should dance upon it
+might be a million times bigger than an atom of matter,
+and not be in danger from vertigo. One may be
+astonished at the amount of intelligence associated
+with the minute brain structure of some of the smaller
+forms of animal life---say the ants; but from the above
+it will be seen that so far as such intelligence is associated
+with atomic and molecular brain structure, the size
+of the brain in the smallest ant, though measured in
+thousandth of an inch, is sufficiently large to involve
+billions of atoms, and the permutations possible are
+almost unlimited. The same idea is applicable to the
+brain of man, and seems to indicate that such differences
+in quality of mind as we see are not so much due
+\DPPageSep{033.png}{21}%
+to the differences in amount of brain, measured in
+cubic inches, as in atomic and molecular structure.
+
+The work of physicists and chemists, carried on for
+many years, has convinced them that none of the processes
+to which matter has been subjected has affected
+its quantity in the slightest degree. A definite quantity
+\index{Atoms, unalterable}%
+of hydrogen, or, what is precisely the same thing,
+a definite number of hydrogen atoms, may be subject
+to any conditions of temperature, may be made to combine
+with other elements successively, forming with
+them solids or liquids or gases, and no atom is
+destroyed nor its individual properties changed in any
+degree. Neither has any phenomenon been discovered
+indicating that new atoms of any kind are ever produced
+by any physical or chemical changes yet known.
+Time does not alter them. Elements that have been
+imbedded in rocks from primeval times, reckoned by
+millions of years, when liberated to-day and tested,
+exhibit precisely the same characteristics as those
+obtained from other sources and that have been subject
+to many artificial conditions. Sometimes a meteorite
+\index{Meteors}%
+reaches the earth, a sample specimen from distant
+space, having moved in some orbit about the sun for
+millions of years. Thousands of such bodies are in
+our possession, and they have been carefully analyzed,
+but no element unfamiliar to the chemist has been
+found among them; and the iron, the nickel, the carbon,
+the hydrogen, and all the rest of the elements that
+compose them, behave in every particular like those
+found on the earth.
+
+So far as spectroscopic evidence goes, it testifies to
+\DPPageSep{034.png}{22}%
+the presence of the same elements in the sun and
+planets and comets; and it is as certain as anything
+physical can be, that the expert chemist here would be
+an equally expert chemist in the planet Mars, if he
+could find a way to cross the immense space that separates
+that star from us.
+
+These facts and conclusions are frequently stated in
+such a form as this, namely, that matter cannot be created
+\index{Atoms, unalterable}%
+or annihilated. All that can fairly be meant by
+such language is that under all the conditions at present
+known, the quantity of matter remains constant;
+and this proposition has a high degree of importance
+in social affairs as well as in philosophy. If matter
+were liable to change in its quantity or quality by being
+subject to various physical conditions, all industries
+involving commercial interests would be in an unstable
+state. If the ton of iron ore should turn out, when
+smelted, only fifty per cent of iron instead of sixty
+per cent, as now,---the rest being either annihilated or
+transformed into lead or gold, or something else,---the
+smelting company would soon go bankrupt, even if
+gold were the product instead of iron, for if gold
+were liable to be produced in that kind of a way,
+its value would be next to nothing as a standard of
+value.
+
+The old alchemists sought to transmute what they
+called the baser elements into gold. It is safe to say,
+if it were physically possible to do it and some one
+should discover the art, and it were an economical process,
+commercial disaster such as the world has never
+known would follow its announcement. It would be as
+\DPPageSep{035.png}{23}%
+if the volcanoes of the world should suddenly begin to
+eject gold in the place of lava.
+
+Stability of physical properties is as essential for
+the stability of society as the regular recurrence
+of day and night; and philosophy would be impossible
+if fundamental data were not in every way immutable.
+
+These physical principles lead to some curious and
+most interesting conclusions with regard to the great
+difference there is between bodies of matter of any
+and all kinds that are familiar to our senses and the
+atoms out of which these larger bodies are composed.
+In every case, where there is a difference in movement
+between two of these larger bodies made up of atoms,
+there is what we call friction, which invariably results
+\index{Friction, its effects}%
+in wearing away some of the material of both. It is
+the result of mechanical friction, to tear away some of
+the surface molecules of the two bodies. Bodies in use
+much, and therefore most subject to friction, become
+worn out. Our clothing is a familiar example; the journals
+of machinery, the tires of wheels, the sharpening
+of tools, the polishing of gems, the weathering of wood
+and stone,---all show that attrition removes some of the
+surface materials of such bodies, but there is nothing
+to indicate that attrition among atoms or molecules ever
+removes any of their material. It appears as if one
+might affirm in the strongest way that the atoms of
+matter never wear out, are not subject to such friction
+and the consequent destruction as comes to all bodies
+made up of them. The molecules of oxygen and nitrogen
+that constitute the air about us have been bumping
+\DPPageSep{036.png}{24}%
+and brushing against each other millions of times a
+second for millions of years probably, and would have
+been worn out or reduced, as the rocks upon the seashore
+have been beaten and ground into sand, if they had
+been subject to friction. So one may be led to the
+conclusion that whatever else may decay atoms do not,
+but remain as types of permanency through all imaginable
+changes---permanent bodies in form and in
+all physical qualities, and permanent in time, capable,
+apparently, of enduring through infinite time. Presenting
+no evidences of growth or decay, they are in strong
+contrast with such bodies of visible magnitude as our
+senses directly perceive. Valleys are lifted up and
+become mountain-tops; mountains wear away and are
+washed into the ocean; the beds of the ocean sink and
+rise; and the boundaries of continents may be worn and
+washed away through the incessant beatings of waves
+against their coasts. Wear and tear go on in all inanimate
+nature unceasingly, so that it is only a question
+of time when everything we see upon the earth will
+have changed beyond identification. The sun is shrinking,
+and must some time cease to shine. The stars,
+too, are changing likewise, because they shine, and
+their places in the firmament will be vacant. All living
+things grow because of change, and decay because
+of more rapid change, and there appears to be nothing
+stable but atoms. If it could be shown that life itself
+and the mind of man were in some way associated with
+\index{Mind, a material habitat for}%
+\index{Mind and matter}%
+atoms of some sort, as inherent properties, the hopes
+\index{Atoms, life associated with}%
+and longings cherished by mankind for continuous existence
+\index{Immortality}%
+beyond the short term of three score years and
+\DPPageSep{037.png}{25}%
+ten would give way to convictions as strong as one
+has in any physical phenomenon whatever; the evidence
+would be demonstrative in the same sense as
+it is for the existence of atoms and their physical
+qualities.
+%\DPPageSep{038.png}{26}%
+
+
+\Chapter{II}{The Ether}{26}
+
+\index{Ether}%
+
+\First{An} incandescent electric lamp consists of a fine
+thread of carbon fixed in a glass bulb from which the
+air has been exhausted. When a proper current of
+electricity is permitted to traverse the carbon filament,
+it becomes white-hot and gives out light like any other
+hot body. Other luminous bodies are in the air, and
+one might infer that the light was transmitted from the
+heated body to the eye by the material of the air itself.
+The light in the vacuum shows that this is not necessarily
+so, for the more perfect the vacuum is made the
+more freely does the light from the filament reach the
+glass bulb that encloses it. One is therefore led to
+infer that matter is not the agent that transmits light.
+The light of the sun reaches us after travelling through
+ninety-three millions of miles of space in about eight
+\index{Light, its velocity}%
+minutes. There are the best of reasons for believing
+that the atmosphere of the earth does not reach at
+most more than two hundred miles upwards from the
+\index{Atmosphere, height of}%
+surface, and its density at the height of only one hundred
+miles is such that there would be only about one
+molecule to the cubic foot.
+
+It is not unlikely that there are free-roving molecules
+in space, as there are meteors in all directions about
+\index{Meteors}%
+\DPPageSep{039.png}{27}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+us, varying in size from fractions of a grain to masses
+weighing some tons, but the distance apart of these
+bodies is so great on the average that they cannot be
+considered as either help or hindrance to the passage of
+the light of either sun or stars. It is known with certainty
+that what we call the light from shining bodies
+is a kind of wave motion. The phenomena of interference,
+which can be brought about in several different
+ways, and which was referred to in the first chapter
+when speaking of the colors of soap-bubbles, show
+this. It is possible to annihilate two rays of light by
+making one of them to follow the other in a certain
+way; and one cannot conceive that two particles of matter
+of any sort could annihilate each other by simply
+changing their positions, but this is precisely what
+happens in light.
+
+Wave motions of all kinds can cancel similar wave
+motions; for the wave consists of periodic movements,
+a crest and a trough, and when the crest and
+trough of one wave are superposed upon the trough
+and crest of another similar one, the result is the
+destruction of both waves. The lengths of these waves
+have been measured by a great many persons in various
+parts of the world, and they all concur that light
+can only be explained by wave motions such as they
+measure.
+
+If there be wave motions, evidently there must be
+something moved. One cannot conceive of a wave
+movement when there is nothing that can be moved;
+so men have been compelled to believe that there is
+some medium between the sun and the earth that is
+\DPPageSep{040.png}{28}%
+\index{Light, its velocity}%
+\index{Stars, their distance}%
+\index{Sun, its distance}%
+\index{Universe, its size}%
+capable of wave motion, and this medium they have
+agreed to call \emph{the ether}.
+
+If one admits the existence of ether between the sun
+and the earth as the agency for the transmission of
+light, he will need to do much more than that. The
+sun is but about ninety-three millions of miles distant,
+but most of the planets are hundreds of millions and
+some of them thousands of millions of miles from us,
+and the light comes from them too; so the ether must
+extend through the space occupied by the solar system,
+the diameter of which is six thousand millions of miles,
+and to cross this space light requires nine hours,
+though going at the rate of one hundred and eighty-six
+thousand miles per second.
+
+Then there are the stars beyond our solar system,
+the nearest one so distant as to require three and a
+half years for the light to get to us at the same rate;
+and some of these are so remote that thousands of years
+are needed for their light to arrive. That light we see
+from them to-day left them before America was discovered,
+before Jesus was born, before the pyramids
+were built, and for all we should be able to see they
+might have ceased to exist long ago, though their light
+continues to shine. So the ether must extend to those
+most distant stars we can see, and that, too, in every
+direction. There is no exaggeration in the statement
+that our visible universe is so great that light requires
+ten thousand years to cross its diameter. There is no
+reason, either, for setting that as a boundary to its
+magnitude; but wherever light comes from to us, there
+must this medium, the ether, be.
+\DPPageSep{041.png}{29}%
+\index{Medium, necessity for}%
+
+But there are other and just as good reasons for
+thinking there must be some medium between bodies,
+even when all atoms and molecules have been removed.
+For instance, everybody knows that one magnet affects
+another at a distance from it, and there is no kind of
+substance known that will prevent such action when
+interposed between them.
+
+If one of these magnets be placed in the most perfect
+vacuum that can be made, it still acts as it would
+in the air, only with still greater freedom. One cannot
+believe that one body can thus act upon another body
+without some kind of a medium between them. Is it
+not absurd to think otherwise? One may, if there
+appears to him to be a good reason, suppose that there
+is a magnetic medium or ether different from that one
+employed in the transmission of light; but there is a
+similar need for imagining one for the effects produced
+by electrified bodies upon other bodies in their neighborhood.
+An electrified glass rod will attract a pith
+ball or anything else just as well in a vacuum as out of
+it; and it is certain that electrical attraction and magnetic
+attraction are not identical, for an electrified body
+will attract one kind of thing as well as another, while
+a magnet is selective in its effects, and affects iron
+chiefly. Hence, if each different effect in a vacuum
+is to be attributed to some different kind of medium,
+there would need to be an electric ether in addition
+to the other two.
+
+Then there is gravitative attraction, which has before
+been mentioned. If it is not rational to think that one
+body can act upon another body not in contact with it
+\DPPageSep{042.png}{30}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+and without some medium between them, then one is
+bound to admit that the gravitative effects observed,
+say between the moon and the earth, the sun and the
+earth, and in every other case, are due to the action of
+some medium between them. Neither is it at all needful
+to be able to explain \emph{how} the medium acts thus and
+thus, or even to imagine how it might, in order to firmly
+believe that there must be one.
+
+Here are four cases of apparent action at a distance
+of one body upon another, requiring some sort of an
+intermediate agency; and, unless there be some good
+reason for thinking there are several such media occupying
+the same space apparently, it is much more
+philosophical to believe it likely that one medium
+exists capable of transmitting effects of the different
+kinds; and especially will this appear to be truer if it is
+known, as it is known, that the magnetic and electric
+effects are transmitted with the same velocity as is the
+light. So that physicists to-day quite concur in the
+belief that what was called at first the luminiferous
+ether, on account of its function in transmitting light,
+is the same medium that is concerned in the other phenomena
+of magnetism, electricity, and gravitation.
+
+It is likewise true that there are some physicists who
+hold rather lightly upon this belief, taking it as a convenient
+working hypothesis, and who would seem to be
+ready in a minute to surrender the idea, unless it had
+been demonstrated in the same way as the existence of
+matter and of motion has been. But this is not the
+attitude of philosophic minds.
+
+Sir Isaac Newton deduced from the observed motions
+\DPPageSep{043.png}{31}%
+of the heavenly bodies the fact that they attract
+each other according to the law now known as the law
+of gravitation, but he says nothing about \emph{how} bodies can
+affect each other. That is, in his ``Principia'' he does
+\index{Principia}%
+not attempt to explain gravitation. He explicitly does
+say, however, that he has not employed hypotheses in
+his work, yet we know from other of his writings that
+the idea of a medium was constantly in his mind. His
+``Principia'' closes thus:---
+\begin{Quote}
+``And now we might add something concerning a
+most subtle spirit which pervades and lies hid in all
+\Pagelabel{31}%
+gross bodies; by the force and action of which spirit
+the particles of bodies mutually attract one another at
+near distances and cohere if contiguous; and electric
+bodies operate to greater distances as well repelling
+as attracting the neighboring corpuscles, and light is
+emitted, reflected, inflected, and heats bodies; and all
+sensation is excited, and the members of animal bodies
+move at the command of the will, namely, by the vibrations
+of this spirit mutually propagated along the solid
+filaments of the nerves from the outward organs of
+sense to the brain, and from the brain to the muscles.
+But these things cannot be explained in few words, nor
+are we furnished with that sufficiency of experiments
+which is required to an accurate determination and
+demonstration of the laws by which this electric and
+elastic spirit operates.''
+\end{Quote}
+
+This shows plainly enough that he believed that
+some medium, different from matter, was essential for
+a mechanical conception of the phenomena he alluded
+to. In a letter to Bentley he states his philosophical
+judgment upon the subject in still stronger terms, and
+it shows, too, the sense in which he is to be understood
+when he says: ``I frame no hypotheses''---%
+\DPPageSep{044.png}{32}%
+which has frequently been repeated to adventurous
+hypothecators as the example of the model scientific
+man. Hear him!
+\begin{Quote}
+``It is inconceivable that inanimate brute matter
+should, without the mediation of something else which
+is not material, operate upon and affect other matter
+without mutual contact, as it must do if gravitation in
+the sense of Epicurus be essential and inherent in it.~\ldots
+That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential
+to matter so that one body can act upon another at
+a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of
+anything else, by and through which their action and
+force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me
+so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in
+philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking
+can ever fall into it.''
+\end{Quote}
+
+Newton uses the word \emph{Spirit} in the sense of a substance
+entirely different from matter (see \Pageref{page}{31}).
+Evidently Newton was so strong a believer in the
+medium that we call the ether, though he could not
+\index{Ether}%
+work out its mode of action, that he was ready to discount
+the intelligence of any man who doubted it.\footnote
+ {In 1708 Newton wrote thus: ``Perhaps the whole frame of nature may be
+ nothing but various contextures of some certain etherial spirits or vapors, condensed,
+ as it were, by precipitation; and after condensation wrought into various
+ forms, at first by the immediate hand of the Creator, and ever after by the power
+ of nature.''
+
+ These with his other acute remarks concerning what we now call the ether
+ lead us to infer that his mechanical instincts were more to be trusted in this field
+ than his more labored efforts.}
+
+If our knowledge of the existence of the ether is
+not so positive as it is for matter, but is inferential, it
+will be readily understood that the knowledge we have
+of its properties cannot be very exhaustive. Some
+have imagined that it was only a finer grained kind of
+\DPPageSep{045.png}{33}%
+matter than that we know as the elements, and that it
+must be made up of atoms, though almost infinitesimal
+in size. Others think it cannot be granular at all, but
+forms a continuous substance throughout space. By
+``continuous'' is meant that there are no interstices in
+it: that it is constituted like a jelly, only not made up
+of distinct parts or atoms, so there can be no such thing
+as separating one part from another, leaving a vacuous
+cavity or rent between them. One of the reasons for
+thinking this to be the case is, that if it were made up
+of finer atoms or of atoms at all, such waves as those
+of light could not be transmitted by it. Longitudinal
+waves, like those of sound in air, can be transmitted
+by atomic or molecular structures but not transverse
+waves, that is, such as are at right angles to the direction
+of propagation. Some of these light waves are as
+short as the hundred-thousandth of an inch, and some
+are as long as the one two-thousandth of an inch, and
+perhaps longer. Yet all of them are transmitted with
+the same velocity in any and every direction. From
+the fact that light travels with the same velocity in
+every direction, it is inferred that the ether is not only
+homogeneous, but its properties are alike in every
+direction. As light is transmitted in straight lines, it
+seems to follow that there is no difference in its quality
+in different parts of space.
+
+That wave motions travel with such high velocity in
+it has been interpreted as proving it to have a high
+degree of elasticity, while the fact that it offers no
+appreciable resistance to the movements of bodies of
+matter in it is supposed to indicate that its density is
+very small.
+\DPPageSep{046.png}{34}%
+\index{Earth, velocity of, in space}%
+\index{Friction, its effects}%
+
+There are some, however, who think that such terms
+as elasticity and density are not appropriately applied
+to the ether. These terms signify properties of atoms
+\index{Ether}%
+and molecules. If density signifies compactness of
+atoms, then the word could not apply to something not
+composed of atoms. In like manner, if elasticity
+means ability to recover form after deformation, then it
+is not applicable to substances that cannot be deformed,
+and it is customary to speak of the ether as
+being incompressible. Still, it is certain that stresses
+may be set up in it in various ways, and that these
+conditions may be propagated, in certain cases in
+straight lines, in other cases in curved lines, so whether
+the explanation be forthcoming or not, there is no
+doubt about the facts.
+
+There is no evidence at all that the ether is subject
+to gravitative action, or that it offers any resistance to
+a body moving in it. That is to say, it gives no evidence
+of friction. Here is the earth rotating upon its
+axis, and the velocity of rotation at the equator is a
+thousand miles an hour, and if there were an appreciable
+amount of friction the earth must slowly be coming
+to rest like a top spun in the air. Yet the astronomers
+tell us that the length of the day has not changed so
+much as the hundredth of a second within the last two
+thousand years. Again the earth revolves in its orbit
+about the sun at the average rate of nineteen miles a
+second, and if the ether through which it moves offered
+any resistance to the motion, the length of the year
+would be changed, but no such change has happened
+in historic times. Again, such bodies as comets move
+\DPPageSep{047.png}{35}%
+\index{Thomson, Sir Wm.}%
+\index{Vortex rings in air}%
+very much faster than the earth; some have been
+known to have a velocity of three hundred miles per
+second when near the sun, but the comets complete
+their circuits and give no evidence of slackened speed
+due to friction in space.
+
+If, then, the ether \emph{fills} all space, is not atomic in
+structure, presents no friction to bodies moving through
+it, and is not subject to the law of gravitation, it does
+not seem proper to call it matter. One might speak of
+it as a substance if he wants another word than its
+specific name for it. As for myself, I make a sharp
+distinction between the ether and matter, and feel
+somewhat confused to hear one speak of the ether as
+matter.
+
+Nearly thirty years ago Helmholtz investigated, in a
+\index{Helmholtz}%
+mathematical way, the properties of vortical motions,
+and, among others, pointed out that if a vortical motion
+was set up in a frictionless medium, the motion would
+be permanent, and it could not be transformed. Sir
+William Thomson at once imagined that if such
+motions were set up in the ether, the persistence of
+their form and the possibility of a variety of motions
+would correspond very closely with the properties that
+the atoms of matter are known to possess. Such vortical
+motions as are here alluded to, all have seen, as
+they are often formed by locomotives when about starting,
+if the air be quiescent. Horizontal rings, three
+or four feet in diameter, may be seen to rise wriggling
+into the air sometimes to the height of several
+hundred feet. They may be formed also by smokers
+by a vigorous throat movement forcibly puffing the
+\DPPageSep{048.png}{36}%
+smoke from their mouths, and they can be made
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbtp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \fbox{\Graphic{0.9\linewidth}{048a}}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{1}{Diag.\ 1.}
+\end{figure}
+artificially by providing a box having a hole on one
+side an inch or two in diameter and the side opposite
+covered with a piece of cloth. A saucer containing
+strong ammonia water and another with strong hydrochloric
+acid may be set inside, and dense fumes will
+fill the box. If the cloth be struck by the hand, a ring
+will issue from the hole, and may go forward several
+feet, and its behavior may be studied. Such as are
+formed in the air under such conditions present so
+many interesting phenomena that it is worth the while
+here to allude to them for the sake of helping the
+mind to a clearer idea of how some of the properties
+exhibited by matter may be accounted for.\footnote
+ {The method of producing these vortex rings and their phenomena are fully
+ explained in ``The Art of Projecting.'' By Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear. Illustrated\DPtypo{}{.}
+ \$2.00. Published by Lee and Shepard, Boston.}
+
+\DPPageSep{049.png}{37}%
+\index{Vortex rings, properties of}%
+
+1. The ring once formed consists of a definite
+amount of the gaseous material of the air in a state of
+rotation, %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[11]{r}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.375in}{049a}
+ \Caption{2}{Diag.\ 2.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+and in its movements afterwards retains the
+same material. It is to be noted
+that the ring is formed in the air,
+the white fumes serving merely to
+make the ring visible. The ring
+moves forward in a straight line
+in the direction it is started, just
+as if it were a solid body. It may
+move very fast too,---ten feet a
+second or more, and reach the
+distant side of the room, but it
+always moves of its own motion in a direction perpendicular
+to the plane of the ring.
+
+2. It possesses momentum, and will push against
+the object it hits.
+
+3. If made to move rapidly adjacent to a surface
+like a wall or table, it will move towards it as if it were
+attracted by it, and generally will be broken up by
+impact against it.
+
+4. A light body, like a feather or thread, will be
+apparently pushed out of the way in front of it, and
+drawn towards it if behind it---phenomena like attraction
+and repulsion.
+
+5. If two such rings bump together at their edges,
+each one will vibrate with well-marked nodes and loops,
+showing that, as rings, they are elastic bodies, and that
+their period of vibration depends upon the rate of the
+rotation.
+
+6. If two such rings be moving in the same line, but
+\DPPageSep{050.png}{38}%
+the hindmost one swifter so as to overtake the other,
+the foremost one enlarges its diameter while the hinder
+one contracts until it can go through the former, when
+each recovers its original dimensions.
+
+7. If two meet in the same line, going in opposite
+directions, the smaller one goes through the larger and
+may be brought to a standstill in the air for a short
+time until the other has got some inches away, when it
+starts on in the same direction as before.
+
+8. If two similar ones are formed at the same time,
+side by side, at a distance of an inch or two, they always
+collide at once as if they had a mutual attraction. The
+result of the collision may be the destruction of one or
+both, or---
+
+9. Each one may break at the point of impact, and
+the opposite ends may weld together, forming a single
+ring which will move on as if it had been singly formed,
+or---
+
+10. Instead of breaking they may rebound from each
+other, but always at right angles to the plane in which
+they were moving at first; that is to say, if they were
+moving in a horizontal plane before impact, they will
+rebound from each other in a vertical plane.
+
+11. Three rings may in like manner be made to join
+into one.
+
+12. The material of the ring may often be seen to
+be in rotation about the ring, while the ring, as a whole,
+does not rotate at all, a rotary wave.
+
+13. The parts of a ring may be in a state of vibration
+in the ring without changing its circular form,
+somewhat as if the ring were tubular and two bodies
+\DPPageSep{051.png}{39}%
+\index{Elasticity due to motion}%
+should move up on opposite sides till they met and
+rebounded to meet below, and so on.
+\Pagelabel{39}%
+
+All these, and some other just as curious phenomena,
+may be observed in vortex rings, and may fairly be said
+to be due to the properties of the rings themselves.
+For instance, the vibratory motions alluded to in the
+fifth show that elasticity is a property of the ring,
+and that the degree of elasticity does not depend upon
+what the ring is made of, but upon the kind and
+degree of motion that constitutes the ring. If such a
+ring could be produced in material not subject to friction,
+none of the motion could be dissipated, and we
+should have a permanent structure, possessing several
+properties such as definite dimensions, volume, elasticity,
+attraction, and so on, all due to the shape and
+motions involved.
+
+Imagine, then, that vortex rings were in some way
+formed in the ether, constituted of ether. If the ether
+be, as it is generally believed to be, frictionless, then
+such a thing would persist indefinitely: it would have
+just that quality of durability that atoms seem to possess.
+It would possess physical attributes, form, magnitude,
+density, energy, that is, it would not be inert.
+It would be elastic, executing a definite number of
+vibrations per second. This property of elasticity has
+generally heretofore been assumed to be a peculiar
+endowment of ordinary matter, and one was at liberty
+to imagine some matter without it because not so made.
+This view implies that elasticity is a necessary property
+of vortex rings; for as the velocity of rotation is
+reduced, so is the degree of elasticity, and if there was
+\DPPageSep{052.png}{40}%
+\index{Bonnenburger's apparatus}%
+simply a ring without being in rotation, it would have
+no elasticity at all, neither would it have any qualities
+different from the medium it was imbedded in.
+
+That such a quality as elasticity may be due solely to
+\Pagelabel{40}%
+motion, and varying with it, one may assure himself
+with that piece of apparatus to be found in most collections
+in schools known as Bonnenburger's. It consists
+of a disk of metal, mounted in gimbals so it can
+be set spinning %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.375in}{052a}
+ \Caption{3}{Diag.\ 3.---\textsc{Bonnenburger's Apparatus.}}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+in any plane. If
+this be set spinning in a vertical
+plane it becomes tolerably rigid
+in that plane, and cannot be moved
+out of it but by the employment
+of quite a degree of pressure. If
+the framework be quickly struck
+by the finger while thus spinning,
+the wheel will begin to rock back
+and forth like the prong of a
+tuning-fork, and the more rapid
+the rotation the higher the rate
+of vibration. When the velocity
+of rotation becomes slow the
+vibratory motion may be as slow
+as once a second, and, of course, when the ring is not
+revolving it will not vibrate at all. Thus there is fairly
+good physical reason for thinking that what we call
+elasticity in the atoms of matter may be due simply
+to the motion they possess, and \emph{how} that may be one
+can understand if atoms be vortex rings.
+
+One may properly ask how one vortex ring can differ
+from another so there could be so many as seventy or
+\DPPageSep{053.png}{41}%
+more different kinds of atoms. To this it may be said
+that such rings may differ from each other not only in
+size but in their rate of rotation: the ring may be a
+thick one or a thin one, may rotate relatively fast or
+slow, may contain a greater or less amount of the ether.
+The word ``mass'' in physics is used to denote a quantity
+of matter as measured by its resistance to pressure
+tending to move it as a whole. Thus if a pressure of
+one pound be applied to two different bodies for say
+one second, and one of them was moved an inch and
+the other but half an inch when otherwise they were
+alike free to move, we would say that one had twice the
+mass of the other---its resistance to being moved was
+twice as great as the other.
+
+In the case of the Bonnenburger's rotating disk, the
+resistance to the pressure tending to move it depends
+upon the rate of rotation, and a thin and swift moving
+disk would offer much greater resistance than a much
+larger one with a slower speed. So one might infer
+that the difference in what is called mass among the
+atoms of matter might be due simply to the different
+speeds with which the rings rotate, rather than in the
+absolute volume of ether in the state of rotation.
+There are other reasons than these for thinking that
+motion is the chief characteristic of matter. Chemists
+have discovered that both the chemical and physical
+properties of all kinds of matter are functions of their
+mass or relative atomic weights, and that they may be
+arranged in a harmonic series. Harmonic relations
+may imply either relations of position or of motion.
+But the fundamental properties of matter do not change
+\DPPageSep{054.png}{42}%
+by changing its position, and one is therefore led to the
+conclusion that one must look to the various kinds of
+motion involved among atoms for the explanation of all
+their properties and all their phenomena.
+
+There is another very important and peculiar property
+possessed by vortex rings; viz., there cannot be
+such a thing as half a ring or any fragment of one.
+Break such a ring in two and there is not left the two
+halves; not only is the ring broken, but each part at once
+vanishes into the indistinguishable substance that composed
+it, and all the properties that characterized it as a
+ring have vanished with it.
+
+This greatly aids one to understand that matter may
+not be infinitely divisible. Over and over again have
+philosophers asserted that it was impossible to imagine
+an atom of matter so small that it could not in imagination
+be again broken into two or more parts. A vortex
+ring, however, shows how the thing can be done.
+If an atom be a ring, when it is disrupted it is at once
+dissolved into ether, and that is the end of it. There
+are no fragments of the ring.
+
+One, however, must not infer from the above treatment
+that it represents knowledge of a demonstrated
+kind, for it does not. It was remarked in the first
+chapter that atoms are too minute to be seen and
+studied as one would study an animalcule or a blood
+corpuscle, and one's knowledge must be altogether
+inferential concerning them; but what knowledge we do
+have, and the inferences that may properly be drawn
+from it, all tend to convince one that matter and the
+ether are most intimately related to each other, and
+\DPPageSep{055.png}{43}%
+that some such theory as the vortex ring theory of
+matter must be true.
+
+Now, it is either that theory or nothing. There is
+no other one that has any degree of probability at all.
+If what is presented herewith is not the precise truth
+concerning a most difficult subject, it may have the
+merit of helping one to conceive the possibilities there
+may be of deducing qualities from motions, and rid him
+of the idea that matter consists necessarily of some
+created things that have no necessary relations to the
+rest of the universe beyond the properties impressed
+by fiat. In the latter case one could never hope to
+understand them, because there could be no \emph{necessary}
+reason for their being as they are, rather than some
+other way, whereas, in the former case, the mechanical
+relations can be understood, and there is left the possibility
+that by and by, with more light and knowledge,
+one may know the physical conditions under which
+matter itself came into existence.
+%\DPPageSep{056.png}{44}%
+
+
+\Chapter{III}{Motion}{44}
+
+\First{Everybody} has so clear a conception of motion that
+there would not seem to be any difficulty in defining it
+absolutely, but philosophers and others from remote
+times till now have been perplexed by its problems.
+How can Achilles ever overtake the tortoise, though
+he runs ten times faster? How can the top of a
+cart-wheel move faster than the bottom? If the sun
+cannot set above the horizon and cannot set below
+it, how can he set at all? In the last chapter some
+phenomena were alluded to which were attributed to
+motions of different kinds, and one must needs have a
+definite notion of what he is talking about in order that
+his words shall convey to himself, as well as others,
+the information he would impart. Rest and motion are
+contrasted conditions of bodies, so if a body is at rest
+we say it is without motion, and \textit{vice versa}. If two persons
+sit side by side in a house they may be said to be
+at rest, but if they sit side by side in a railroad car they
+will be at rest relative to each other as they were
+before, but may be in motion with reference to things
+outside the car. If, as a vessel sails past the end of a
+wharf, a person on board would talk with a person
+standing upon the wharf, he will walk so as to keep
+\DPPageSep{057.png}{45}%
+opposite the man standing still, and the two will be
+at rest in relation to each other, while one will be in
+motion with reference to everything on board the vessel.
+Thus it appears that rest and motion are relative
+terms, and can only be understood to apply to the
+relative continuous position of two bodies or objects.
+Hence, if there were but one object in the universe there
+could be no such thing as change of position, for that
+implies another body with which position may be compared
+at intervals. But such a single body might have
+some internal motions by which there was a relative
+change of position of its parts with reference to themselves.
+For instance, a tuning-fork might be at rest as
+a whole with reference to all other bodies, yet its prongs
+might vibrate towards and away from each other, the
+centre of mass or the centre of gravity of the fork itself
+not moving in the slightest degree either with reference
+to itself or anything outside itself. Again, a body might
+spin like a top, and there would be no change of position
+of the body as a whole with reference to any other
+body, nor change of position of the parts with reference
+to each other, yet there would be a change of position
+of the parts with reference to all bodies outside itself.
+Hence, a brief definition of motion is not so easy to
+give.
+
+One might say that motion was the change of position
+of a body with reference to other bodies, or the change
+of position of the parts of a body with reference to each
+other, or the change of position of the parts of a body
+with reference to other bodies. But these would not cover
+all possible cases. There need be no trouble, however,
+\DPPageSep{058.png}{46}%
+\index{Molecules, size of}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+in particular cases, because there will always be data at
+hand to determine the character and direction of the
+motion.
+
+One may study the geometry of positions and changing
+positions of mathematical points, and attend only to
+rates and direction of motion of all sorts, without considering
+the motions of bodies of real magnitude possessing
+physical properties like matter. The science
+that has to do with such ideal conditions is called \emph{kinematics}.
+\index{Kinematics}%
+Whenever the motions of matter are considered,
+the science is called \emph{kinetics}. Of course all
+\index{Kinetics}%
+phenomena involve the motions of matter. Although
+one sees a great variety of motions, a few examples of
+particular sorts may be helpful in analyzing them.
+
+1. The drifting of clouds, the flight of birds, of
+arrows, of bullets, of meteors, the sailing of vessels, the
+running of locomotives, are examples of one kind of
+motion; namely, where the change of position is that
+of the body as a whole with reference to other bodies
+external to it. The cloud may drift with the air, but
+with reference to the surface of the earth it moves.
+Where a body thus moves straight on continuously with
+reference to other bodies, whether the distance moved
+be long or short, the motion is called \emph{translatory} or
+\emph{free-path motion}. The latter term is most frequently
+applied to the movements of the molecules of a gas.
+In ordinary air the distance apart of the molecules is on
+the average about the one two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth
+of an inch, but the molecules themselves being
+only one fifty-millionth of an inch in diameter, it will
+be seen that they have a space to move in about two
+\DPPageSep{059.png}{47}%
+\index{Vacuum}%
+hundred times their own diameter before coming in
+collision with another one; and after collision their
+direction is only changed when they go on to another
+collision, and we say that their free path is on an average
+about the two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of an
+inch. With some modern air-pumps it is possible to
+reduce the amount of air in a space so that the average
+free path of a remaining molecule will be a foot or more;
+but neither the size of the moving body, nor the distance
+hundred times their own diameter before coming in
+collision with another one; and after collision their
+direction is only changed when they go on to another
+collision, and we say that their free path is on an average
+about the two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of an
+inch. With some modern air-pumps it is possible to
+reduce the amount of air in a space so that the average
+free path of a remaining molecule will be a foot or more;
+but neither the size of the moving body, nor the distance
+it moves, nor the velocity with which it moves,
+makes any essential difference in the specific kind of
+motion: so the movements of air particles among themselves,
+of billiard-balls between impacts, of a bullet on
+its way to the target, and of a planet or comet in its
+orbit, are all examples of the same kind of motion,
+namely, translational.
+
+2. The swaying of the branches of trees when
+moved by the wind, the swinging of the pendulums
+of clocks, the movement of the piston in a steam-engine,
+of the prongs of tuning-forks, the reeds and
+strings in musical instruments, are examples of a different
+kind of motion, inasmuch as the changes of position
+relate to the body itself rather than to external bodies.
+The tuning-fork is the type of them all, and together
+they are called \emph{vibratory} motions. Sometimes, when
+the bodies that move thus are large and the motion conspicuous,
+as, for example, in the pendulum of the clock,
+and the steam-engine piston, the motion is spoken of
+as \emph{oscillatory}. In such cases, as in the former one, it
+should be borne in mind that mere differences in the
+size of bodies, or of the rate of motion, does not in any
+\DPPageSep{060.png}{48}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+manner change the character of the motion, so the
+name that is applicable to one will be equally applicable
+to all. If one calls the movement of a vibrating tuning-fork
+\emph{vibratory}, the same term may be applied to an
+atom if it goes through a like periodic change of form,
+for that is the chief characteristic of vibratory motion;
+and hereafter it will appear how needful it is to bear
+this in mind, for what a given amount of motion will
+do will be seen to depend altogether upon the kind of
+motion.
+
+3. The spinning-top, the balance-wheels of engines,
+the wheels of machines of all kinds, the turning of the
+earth, and each member of the solar system upon its
+axis, are examples of another sort, where the displacement
+is not, as in the last, between parts of the same
+body, but a change in the relative position of each part
+of a body to what is outside itself. The pendulum of a
+clock swings to and fro, but its point of suspension does
+not move; whereas every part of a turning-wheel is
+presented to opposite parts of space in the plane of its
+revolution. This motion is called \emph{rotary}, and just as in
+the other two cases, I wish to emphasize the fact that
+the term is properly applicable to masses of matter of
+all degrees of magnitude; so an atom may spin on its
+axis as well as the earth or sun, and the phenomena it
+will be competent to produce by such spinning will be
+very different from that produced by its vibrations or
+free-path motions.
+
+These three kinds are all of the primary ones: all
+the others we see are made up of these or their compounds.
+For instance, a compound of a free-path
+\DPPageSep{061.png}{49}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+\index{Motion, molecular and atomic}%
+motion with a vibratory motion will give a wave or
+sinuous motion if the direction of the vibration be at
+right angles to the free path. A combination of a free-path
+with a rotary may give a spiral motion, as illustrated
+by the movement of a screw when pushed and
+turned into a piece of wood.
+
+In a sewing-machine may be seen all of these kinds
+of motion and some other compounds more complex
+than the ones spoken of, but one may readily analyze
+them into the three primary ones.
+
+These forms of motion have been spoken of as if
+they were peculiar to matter; but it ought not to be
+inferred that motion is not attributable to the ether.
+Indeed, we know that some sorts of motions are propagated
+in the ether. For instance, what we call light
+is an example. Its form is \emph{undulatory}; and, as we have
+seen above, an undulatory motion is a compound of a
+rectilinear and a vibratory. A spiral movement in the
+ether is also known, and it is sometimes called rotary-polarized
+light: its motion is like that of a screw, and
+we know that such a motion is a compound of a rectilinear
+and a rotary. Rotary motions in the ether are
+also known as taking place in front of magnetic poles,
+and are the results of the magnetism imparted to the
+iron or other substance. I am not aware that any
+simple rectilinear motion is known to occur in the
+ether: there may be, and likely enough is, such.
+
+For convenience, motions that are large enough to
+be visible are called \emph{mechanical motions}, while those
+too minute to be seen are often called \emph{molecular} or
+\emph{atomic}. Sometimes these molecular and atomic motions
+\DPPageSep{062.png}{50}%
+\index{Motion, velocity of}%
+are spoken of as if they were mysterious, and not to be
+understood in the same sense as the larger ones that
+are visible to us; but it is difficult to justify any such
+distinction, and difficult to imagine that any kind of a
+motion a large piece of matter may have, a small particle
+or atom cannot have, and \textit{vice versa}. It would
+seem probable that whoever finds a difficulty in this
+cannot have strong mechanical aptitudes, and is not
+gifted with an adequate scientific imagination.
+
+A free body of any kind and of any magnitude may
+have any kind of a motion whatever, and may move in
+any direction and with different velocities, but the term
+\index{Velocities}%
+velocity is used in different senses when applied to different
+kinds of motion. Thus the velocity of an atom
+in its free path, of a musket-bullet, of sound-waves, is
+measured in feet per second. The velocity of vibrating
+bodies is indicated by the number of vibrations they
+make per second. A tuning-fork making two hundred
+and fifty-six vibrations in a second is said to have that
+rate of vibration, whether the actual distance moved be
+one distance or another, which, of course, will depend
+upon the amplitude of each individual swing; while
+rotational velocity is generally specified by giving the
+number of rotations per second, or per minute, or some
+other unit interval of time. A top may spin a hundred
+times a second, a balance-wheel of a steam-engine turn
+four times, while the earth makes one revolution in a
+day of twenty-four hours. The range in velocities of
+these different kinds that have been measured is very
+great indeed. In free-path or translational motion,
+there may be the snail's pace, perhaps less than an
+\DPPageSep{063.png}{51}%
+inch a minute, the pace of a man walking say three
+miles an hour, which is at the rate of eighty-eight feet
+per minute. A race-horse may trot a mile in two
+minutes and ten seconds, which is forty feet per
+second. A steam-locomotive may run seventy miles
+an hour, which is nearly one hundred feet per second.
+A rifle-bullet may go a thousand feet, and a cannon-ball
+two thousand feet in a second. The earth in its orbital
+motion goes seventeen miles per second; meteors come
+to the earth, from space, sometimes having a velocity
+of fifty or more miles per second, while comets may
+reach the velocity of nearly four hundred miles in the
+same time when near the sun. These are the velocities
+of bodies of visible magnitude, but some of the motions
+of molecules are fairly comparable with some of these.
+Thus a molecule of common air is moving in its free
+path about sixteen hundred feet per second, while a
+molecule of hydrogen, which is much lighter, goes
+more than six-thousand feet---upwards of a mile---in the
+same time. As remarked before, the free path for air
+molecules having but about the two-hundred-thousandth
+part of an inch, it must change its direction an enormous
+number of times in a second,---as many times as
+one two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of an inch is contained
+in sixteen hundred feet;
+\[
+250,000 × 12 × 1,600 = 4800,000000.
+\]
+Four thousand eight hundred millions of times. How
+one may assure himself that such a statement is not
+fabulous will be pointed out farther on; so far one
+needs only to trust the multiplication table.
+\DPPageSep{064.png}{52}%
+
+For vibratory rates there are also enormous ranges:
+there are the slow oscillatory movements of swinging
+pendulums of various lengths, sometimes occupying
+several seconds for the execution of one vibration;
+piano-strings having a range from about forty per
+second to four thousand; the chirrup of crickets about
+three thousand. Short whistles and steel rods have
+been made that will make as many as twenty thousand
+vibrations per second,---a rate much higher than can be
+\index{Vibrations per second}%
+perceived by most persons, though occasionally abnormal
+hearing in an individual enables him to hear sounds
+to which ordinary ears are entirely deaf. When the
+number of vibrations per second becomes so great that
+they cannot be individually seen nor heard, one must
+trust his judgment and the properties of matter in
+determining whether there really are any still more
+rapid. It has been found by experiment that the number
+of vibrations a given body can make when it is
+struck so as to produce a sound depends upon its shape,
+its size, its density, and its degree of elasticity. If a
+steel rod, having a given diameter and length, makes,
+when struck, five hundred vibrations per second, another
+similar one with but half the length will make twice as
+many in the same time. If one were made of something
+still more elastic than steel, and of the same size,
+the vibratory rate would be higher still.
+
+A steel tuning-fork three inches long may make five
+hundred vibrations per second; if it were only the one
+fifty-millionth of an inch long it would make not less
+than $30000,000000$ vibrations per second; and if it
+were made of a substance like ether it would make as
+\DPPageSep{065.png}{53}%
+many as $1000,000000,000000$---a thousand million
+of millions per second. As large as this number is,
+and as improbable as it would seem to be, there is indubitable
+evidence that the atoms of matter do actually
+make such a number of vibrations per second.
+\index{Vibrations per second}%
+\Pagelabel{53}%
+
+If one knows the rate at which vibrations are propagated
+in a medium and the wave length, one can readily
+determine the number of vibrations the body is making
+that sets up the waves. Thus, if the velocity of sound
+in the air be $1100$~feet per second, and the length of
+one wave be $1$~foot, then the body must be making
+$\dfrac{1100}{1}=1100$ vibrations per second: that is, the velocity
+divided by the wave length will give the number of
+vibrations.
+
+The velocity of light is known to be $186000$ miles
+per second; the wave lengths of light are also known with
+great precision, and are all only small fractions of an
+inch. If they were only one inch long, their number
+would be the number of inches there are in $186000$
+miles, or $12 × 5,280 × 186000 = 11784,960000$ per
+second. In reality they are only one forty-thousandth
+or the one fifty-thousandth of that.
+\[
+11784,960000 × 50000 = 589,248000,000000,
+\]
+nearly six hundred millions of millions per second. No
+one can pretend to comprehend such a number; but in
+proportion as he understands the process and the data
+by which such a result is reached, will he have an abiding
+confidence that it is legitimate and that it expresses
+the actual truth.
+\DPPageSep{066.png}{54}%
+
+Sometimes it is convenient to know the actual space
+that is moved over by a vibrating body in terms
+of free-path or translatory motion, that is, how far
+would the body move in the same time if, instead of
+vibrating, it went on in a straight line. If the prong
+of a tuning-fork moves through the one-hundredth of
+an inch each swing, and vibrates one hundred times in
+a second, obviously its rate of motion measured that
+way would be only one inch, which would be a relatively
+slow motion when compared with many others.
+If the same computation be applied to atoms, however,
+whose rate of vibration is so enormously high, it leads
+to some very respectable translational velocities. Thus,
+\index{Velocities}%
+suppose the amplitude of vibration of an atom of hydrogen
+be as great as one-half its diameter, that is, one
+hundred-millionth of an inch, if it vibrates five hundred
+millions of millions of times per second, the actual
+space moved through will be
+\[
+\frac{500,000000,000000}{100,000000}
+ = 5,000000 \text{ inches} = 80 \text{ miles,}
+\]
+which is more than four times that of the earth in
+its orbit. It does not appear probable, however, that
+the amplitude of motion is anywhere near as much
+as that assumed, at any rate for ordinary temperatures;
+but if it be only the one-hundredth of that amplitude
+the velocity exceeds that which can artificially be given
+to any visible object, as it will then be nearly a mile a
+second.
+
+Rotary speeds have wide ranges. The earth takes
+twenty-four hours to make one revolution; the moon
+about twenty-eight days, and the sun twenty-six, and
+\DPPageSep{067.png}{55}%
+\index{Earth, diameter of}%
+some others of the planets perhaps much longer than
+that. Some astronomers have concluded from their
+observations of the planets Venus and Mercury, that
+\index{Mercury}%
+\index{Venus}%
+their axial rotation corresponds with their time of revolution
+about the sun, being $224$~days for Venus, and $88$
+for Mercury. Tops have been made to spin eight hundred
+or a thousand times per second; and if molecules
+ever rotate their rate has not been measured. The
+velocity of rotation, when measured as a translation,
+must evidently depend upon the diameter of the body
+rotating. The diameter of the earth being nearly eight
+thousand miles, a point on the equator moves twenty-five
+thousand miles in twenty-four hours---something
+over a thousand miles an hour, or about seventeen miles
+a minute. A driving-wheel of a locomotive that is six
+feet in diameter will advance nearly nineteen feet every
+revolution. To have a speed of a mile a minute, which
+is $88$~feet per second, it must turn round $\dfrac{88}{19}=4.6$~times
+per second\DPtypo{}{.} A disk $4$~inches in diameter, spinning $800$
+revolutions per second, which was the speed given by
+Foucault to one of his gyroscopes, would advance, if
+allowed to roll, with the speed of $837$~feet per second---nearly
+ten miles a minute.
+
+There are some facts, and inferences we draw from
+them, with regard to motion and the geometry of space
+that it may be well to mention here. When we speak
+of the velocity of a body at a given time we mean by it
+that its rate is such that if continued for the whole
+interval of the unit of time, whether it be a second, or
+a minute, an hour, or any other, the body will move
+\DPPageSep{068.png}{56}%
+\index{Sun, its distance}%
+through the whole specified distance. A body will not
+need to go a mile in a minute in order to have a velocity
+of a mile a minute. It may not move ten feet, yet
+may have that or any higher velocity. This is obvious
+enough of course. Every one trusts arithmetical processes
+to lead him to correct results in velocities and
+\index{Velocities}%
+time and all such familiar matters. One will say
+frequently, ``It is six hours to New York'' instead of,
+``It is two hundred miles to New York,'' and will not
+be misunderstood. Some persons have computed how
+long a time it would take to reach the sun if they were
+to take an express-train running at the rate of fifty
+miles an hour, without stopping for food or fuel; and
+they find it comes out nearly two hundred years,---a
+time of transit equivalent to five generations of men.
+In like manner, presuming one knows the distance to
+any remote point in space, the time required to get
+there at a given velocity one would call a simple problem
+in arithmetic, and it is. But there is an assumption
+one has to make which is rarely considered: that is,
+the properties of space and of time are the same everywhere,
+and that the geometry of the space in which we
+\index{Geometry}%
+live is a geometry that holds everywhere and always:
+that its propositions are absolutely and irrefragably true
+always and everywhere. We assume, because we find
+them practically true on a small scale, that they are
+equally true on the largest scale.
+
+Within the past fifty years the great geometers have
+made some very wonderful discoveries---one might say,
+astounding discoveries; for they tell us that we do not
+know that the sum of the interior angles of a plain
+\DPPageSep{069.png}{57}%
+triangle is equal to a hundred and eighty degrees,
+that we do not know it within ten degrees if the
+triangle be a very large one, such as is formed by
+the spaces between remote stars and the sun; furthermore,
+we are assured that, for all we know, and therefore
+for all we can reason from, space itself may be
+\Pagelabel{57}%
+curved so that if one were to start in what we call a
+straight line, in any direction, and travel in it on and on
+he would find himself after a long time coming to his
+starting-point from the opposite direction; that what
+one would see if his sight were prolonged in any direction
+would be the back of his own head much magnified.
+Methods have been proposed for discovering if it be
+true or not. Some folks have called this nonsense, and
+have used descriptive adjectives to express their contempt
+for it; but none of those who have spoken thus
+of the new geometry are themselves mathematicians,
+\index{Geometry}%
+and one is therefore left with the fair inference that
+they did not so well know of what they condemned as
+did the mathematicians who reached the conclusion.\footnote
+ {See \hyperref[page:400]{Appendix}.}
+
+Now, we all of us trust such mathematical processes
+as we can ourselves handle, even when they lead us to
+magnitudes and distances too great for comprehension.
+All that one needs to know is, that the process is a
+legitimate one and is correctly worked out. This new
+geometry I have alluded to has been worked at by the
+best mathematicians of all the civilized nations, and
+they agree in the conclusions. They certainly would
+not do so if there were the slightest apparent reason
+for rejecting them; for national jealousies are too
+\DPPageSep{070.png}{58}%
+strong, and a sense of the value of truth too great, to
+allow any such notions to gain currency anywhere if
+there were any possibilities of breaking them down.
+
+If the space we live in and the geometric relations
+\index{Space}%
+are only practically true upon a small scale; if we may
+have a kind of space of four or more dimensions, whether
+we now can conceive of it or not, then should one understand
+that spaces and distances and velocities and all
+computations formed upon them, though practically
+true, for all of our experience must not be pushed up
+into statements that shall embrace all things in the
+heavens as well as on the earth. Perhaps even the
+visible universe is not to be measured by our span,
+much less things invisible in it and beyond it.
+%\DPPageSep{071.png}{59}%
+
+
+\Chapter{IV}{Energy}{59}
+
+\First{Whenever} a body of matter having any motion
+strikes another body, it always imparts some of its
+motion to it, and the second body moves. The ability
+one body has to move another one is sometimes called
+its energy, and the amount of energy received is proportional
+to the amount of similar energy the first body
+possesses. A body at rest can impart no motion to
+another one, so it appears that the energy a body has
+depends upon its own amount of motion. Neither can
+a body impart to another one more motion than it possesses
+itself, and rarely or never can it do so much as
+that. Inasmuch as every kind of a phenomenon is the
+\index{Phenomena, nature of}%
+result of the transfer of some kind of motion from one
+body to another, one may rightly infer that to understand
+phenomena and their relations, one must need to
+know, not only the kinds of motion that are transferred,
+but must also know their quantitative relations, and he
+must therefore have some units and standards for comparison.
+This requires some measure for the amount
+of matter involved, also some measure for the motion
+it has. For the former it is customary to employ a
+weight. A certain mass of matter called a pound is
+adopted in England and America. Exact duplicates of
+\DPPageSep{072.png}{60}%
+\index{Falling bodies}%
+\index{Falling bodies, energy of}%
+\index{Weights, standards of}%
+\index{Work, standard of}%
+its standard weights are made and preserved by each
+nation; so as weights become worn by usage, they
+may be exactly replaced. Any unit space may be
+adopted, as the foot, which is common. If a pound
+has been raised a foot, a certain amount of work has
+been done, which is called a \emph{foot-pound}, and it is important
+\index{Foot-pound}%
+to keep in mind just what it signifies. If ten
+pounds be raised one foot, or if one pound be raised
+ten feet, the same amount of work---ten foot-pounds---has
+been done; and with this as a starting-point, it
+will be easy to see how energy may be measured, for
+the measure of it will be the amount of work, measured
+in foot-pounds, it can do. It is found by experiment
+that if a body be left free to fall in the air, it will fall
+sixteen feet in a second, and its velocity at the end of
+the second will be thirty-two feet. If a very elastic
+ball weighing a pound should fall thus in the air upon
+an elastic pavement, it would rebound nearly to the
+height of sixteen feet. If it does not quite reach that
+height, it is because the air retards it somewhat, and
+some of its motion has been imparted to the pavement
+upon which it falls. Adding those losses to the height
+it did rise, and it would make the sixteen feet. Now, to
+raise a pound sixteen feet required sixteen foot-pounds
+of work; there must therefore have been sixteen foot-pounds
+of energy at the instant of impact. Its velocity
+was thirty-two feet per second. Hence a body weighing
+one pound, having a velocity of thirty-two feet in a
+second, is capable of doing sixteen foot-pounds of work.
+It is found also that if the same body falls for two
+seconds, it will fall sixty-four feet, and its velocity at
+\DPPageSep{073.png}{61}%
+the end of the second second will be sixty-four feet,---twice
+as great as it was for the fall of one second; but
+the pound weight in this case will rise under similar
+\index{Weight}%
+conditions to the height of sixty-four feet, which is four
+times higher than for thirty-two feet per second; so it
+is seen that in this case, when the velocity is doubled,
+the power of doing work, measured in foot-pounds, has
+been increased four times, and this is generally expressed
+by saying that the energy of a body is proportional
+to the square of its velocity. The particular
+direction in which a body moves has not been found to
+make any difference in this regard, so the statement is
+a general one. If a mass weighing two pounds were
+dropped, as in the first instance, it would rise no higher
+than if it weighed but one; but two pounds raised sixteen
+feet would give thirty-two foot-pounds, so the
+work would be proportional to the weight as well as to
+the square of the velocity.
+
+The amount of matter there is in, say, a pound weight
+would be just the same in one place as in another; but
+the attraction of the earth upon it depends upon where
+it is. At the surface, where we measure it, it has a
+certain value; but at the centre of the earth it would
+weigh nothing. The farther it were removed from
+the surface of the earth upwards, the less would its
+weight be. At the height of a thousand miles it would
+be but four-fifths of a pound; at a million miles it
+would be but sixteen-millionths of a pound, or only
+about the tenth of a grain.
+
+For that reason it has become necessary to find
+some measure for matter that shall be independent of
+\DPPageSep{074.png}{62}%
+\index{Foot-pound}%
+\index{Work, measure of}%
+position, and this has been found by dividing the weight
+of the body at a given place by the value of gravity at
+that place, and calling the quotient the \emph{mass}; so if $w$~represents
+the weight of a body at a given place, and
+$g$~the value of gravity at the same place, that is, the
+velocity that gravity will give to a body in one second
+if left free to fall, then $\dfrac{w}{g} = m$, the mass. The distance
+in feet that a body will fall in a second is equal
+to the square of the velocity divided by twice the value
+of gravity, or~$d$, the distance,~$= \dfrac{v^2}{2g}$; and as the weight
+equals~$mg$, the product of the two is $mg × \dfrac{v^2}{2g} = \dfrac{mv^2}{2}$,
+one-half the product of the mass into the square of the
+velocity will give the energy of a body. But it is
+generally more convenient to use the weight of the
+body instead of its mass. As $m = \dfrac{w}{g}$, let it be substituted
+for~$m$ in the expression of energy, and we shall
+have $\dfrac{wv^2}{2g} = pd$ (pressure in pounds into distance in
+feet), or foot-pounds, a very convenient expression to
+keep in mind if one has any problems in motion and
+energy for solution.
+
+An example will make plain the utility of this. A
+body weighing ten pounds is moving with the velocity
+of one hundred feet in a second; how much energy has it?
+$\dfrac{wv^2}{2g} = \dfrac{10 × 100^2}{64} = 1562~\text{foot-pounds}$; that is, it has
+energy enough to raise $1562$~pounds a foot high, or ten
+pounds $156.2$~feet high.
+\DPPageSep{075.png}{63}%
+
+This is applicable to all bodies, big and little, whose
+weight and velocity of translation are given.
+
+When a person who weighs one hundred and fifty
+pounds climbs a flight of stairs---say, to the height of
+ten feet---he has done $150 × 10 = 1500$ foot-pounds of
+work. Whether he has gone up fast or slow makes no
+difference in the amount of work done; it will only
+make a difference in the \emph{rate} of doing work. Now, a
+horse-power is a rate of work, and is equal to $550$~foot-pounds
+a second; and hence if the above individual
+climbs the stairs at the rate of four feet a second, he
+will be doing $4 × 150 = 600$ foot-pounds per second,
+which is over a horse-power, and indicates the
+probability that he would not climb so fast. If any
+one thinks he can do it, it will be worth his while to
+try it.
+
+Work can be measured on a horizontal as well as a
+vertical plane. Suppose the horses on a horse-car pull
+two hundred pounds, as indicated by a dynamometer,
+and the car is moved five feet in a second: the pull
+into the distance measures the work done; that is,
+$pd = 200 × 5 = 1000$ foot-pounds, a little less than
+two-horse power. These illustrations are given because
+not every one has clear enough ideas concerning the
+meaning of energy and work, much less the ability to
+apply them to examples that may often come up.
+When one sees the long trail of a meteor in the sky,
+and remembers that its velocity may be as much as
+twenty or more miles per second, he will now see that
+it may have a good deal of energy, though its weight be
+but a few grains.
+\DPPageSep{076.png}{64}%
+\index{Energy of translation}%
+\index{Meteors}%
+\index{Work, measure of}%
+
+The energy of a pound moving twenty miles a second
+would equal
+\[
+\frac{1 × (20 × 5280)^2}{64} = 174,240000 \text{ foot-pounds.}
+\]
+A grain is one seven-thousandth of a pound, and its
+energy would therefore be but the one seven-thousandth
+of that quantity. $\dfrac{174,240000}{7000} = 24891$, which is the
+number of foot-pounds of work a meteor weighing one
+grain, at that velocity, may have: enough to raise a
+ton twelve feet high.
+
+As a matter of fact, the great friction it is subject to
+in its path through the air heats it shortly to incandescence,
+and it is presently dissipated. If it were not for
+the air, therefore, even if we could subsist without it,
+mankind would be in constant danger from the flying
+missiles; for though they would weigh but a little,
+their velocity would enable them to do destructive
+work upon everything they struck. As there are some
+millions that come into the atmosphere every day, no
+one could be safe from them in any place.
+
+The energy of a workingman is measured in the
+same way; namely, by the amount of work in foot-pounds
+he can do.
+
+One of the most direct ways of knowing this for an
+individual is to ascertain the amount of earth or stones
+he can load into a cart, or the bricks he can carry up a
+ladder to the mason. Suppose he throws fifteen shovelfuls
+per minute, each one holding ten pounds, and each
+one is raised four feet high: then in a minute he has done
+\DPPageSep{077.png}{65}%
+\index{Goose, work in flying}%
+$15 × 10 × 4 = 600$ foot-pounds of work, or $10$~per second.
+This is rather a small quantity, only the one fifty-fifth of
+what a horse-power would do, and most men have been
+found able to do forty or fifty foot-pounds per second;
+still, there is a great difference in individuals in their
+working ability. Climbing, in general, is hard work
+because it is continuous lifting of one's self. One who
+weighs one hundred and fifty pounds, and climbs one
+hundred feet, has done $15000$ foot-pounds of work; and
+if he has done it in a minute, he has spent nearly half a
+horse-power, which is $33000$ foot-pounds a minute.
+
+Once more: a bird in flying has to do work; and one
+may see how much is demanded of such birds as geese,
+that make long voyages through the air in the fall and
+spring,---sometimes for twelve hours or more continuously.
+As work is measured by pressure into distance,
+one may apply it thus. Geese are known to fly at the
+rate of thirty miles per hour, which is forty-four feet per
+second. In flying, of course, there has to be a push
+forward by means of their wings, not only to advance,
+but to maintain their elevation. Supposing that a large
+bird flying at this rate should have to exert a push of
+one pound continually: it would be expending then forty-four
+foot-pounds per second, nearly one-twelfth of a horsepower;
+and to maintain such a rate for twelve hours
+would imply that it had a supply of energy to start with
+of $44 × 60 × 60 × 12 = 1,900800$ foot-pounds for one
+day's expenditure. This does not seem at all probable,
+and one may therefore infer that the pressure exerted
+when going at that rate is much less. If the pressure
+were but one ounce instead of a pound, the rate of work
+\DPPageSep{078.png}{66}%
+\index{Energy of vibration}%
+would be $\dfrac{44}{16} = 2.75$ foot-pounds per second, which is
+much more likely; but this supposes the bird to have a
+supply of energy of $\dfrac{1,900800}{2.75} = 700000$ foot-pounds.
+
+In the chapter on ``\hyperref[chap:chemism]{Chemism},'' the source of the
+energy of animals will be more particularly treated.
+
+So far the energy involved in translatory or free-path---or,
+as it is more often called, mechanical---energy
+has been considered; but vibratory motions of matter involve
+energy also, and the same expression is applicable
+as in the first case,~$\dfrac{wv^2}{2g}$. Here the value of the~$v$,
+or the velocity, has to be determined by analyzing the
+motion itself. This is not simply the number of times
+the body vibrates, but also the extent of each individual
+vibration,---that is to say, the amplitude of vibration,---and
+the product of these two factors will give the
+value of~$v$ needed. So if $n$~be the number of times the
+body vibrates a second, and $a$~be the amplitude of the individual
+vibrations, the true velocity will be represented
+by~$an$, and then the expression for the energy will be
+\[
+\dfrac{wa^2 n^2}{2g}.
+\]
+For most bodies of visible magnitude the amplitude of
+vibration is so small a quantity that for frequencies of
+only a few hundred per second, the velocity, measured
+as a translation, is small, and therefore the energy is
+small, and there are few cases where it is very important
+to take it into account.
+
+Suppose a vibrating body has an amplitude of the
+\DPPageSep{079.png}{67}%
+one-hundredth of an inch, and vibrates a hundred times
+in a second: the total distance moved through in a
+second would be but an inch, which would be the value
+of~$v$, so the amount of energy it had would depend
+more largely upon the weight of the body. On the
+other hand, if a body is so small that its rate of vibration
+is exceedingly high, as was shown in the case of
+atoms on \Pageref{page}{53}, there might be a relatively large
+amount of energy involved. In the case refered\DPnote{** [sic]} to, a
+velocity of eighty miles a second was computed, on
+\Pagelabel{67}%
+the supposition that the amplitude of vibration was
+equal to one-half the diameter of the atom; and what
+amount of energy is possessed by a body weighing one
+grain was computed. The amount in an atom with
+that vibratory rate and amplitude would be calculated
+by dividing the amount in the grain by the number of
+atoms in a grain. Numerically it is a very, very small
+quantity, and only becomes appreciable to any of our
+senses when vast numbers of atoms act conjointly.
+
+There are some cases where energy is apparently
+expended when there is no apparent motion, as is the
+case when a man holds up a weight. If the weight be
+\index{Muscular work}%
+\index{Work, muscular}%
+a heavy one, exhaustion will be the result as much as if
+energy was spent in any other way. This muscular
+work is called physiological work, and for a long time
+it was not understood. It is now known, however, that
+when a muscle is put in a state of tension, it is in longitudinal
+vibration a great many times a second. This
+may be perceived by putting the end of a finger into
+the ear, pressing but gently, at the same time squeezing
+with the rest of the hand as if grasping something
+\DPPageSep{080.png}{68}%
+\index{Energy of rotation}%
+tightly; a low sound will be heard, made by perhaps
+no more than thirty or forty vibrations per second.
+The muscles in a state of tension produce this. When
+one holds up a weight---say, a pail of water---the muscles
+involved yield and contract rapidly, so the weight
+is really raised in a vibratory way a short distance, but
+a great many times in a second; and the heavier the
+weight, the more the work done, and this too is measured
+in the same way as other more visible kinds.
+There is good reason for believing that a book resting
+upon a table is supported by the vibratory motions
+going on among the particles of the table, and therefore
+energy is expended to do it, and that this is supplied
+by the heat present in the body; that is, the
+temperature of the table is a little different from what
+it would be if it did not have any weight to support.
+
+Walking involves the expenditure of energy in the
+same way. Each step requires the whole body to be
+raised somewhat. Suppose it be only an inch. A
+person weighing $150$~pounds would, for each step, do
+$\dfrac{150}{12}$ foot-pounds~$= 12\frac{1}{2}$. If he takes two steps per
+second, then each minute he does $2 × 12\frac{1}{2} × 60 = 1500$
+foot-pounds of work. Thus one can see how physiological
+processes are measurable in terms of mechanical
+units.
+
+The energy of a rotating body is more complicated
+than translational energy, because a part of the body is
+at rest,---the axis; and the velocity of movement at
+any point away from that is proportional to its distance
+from it. In the case of the balance-wheels of steam
+\DPPageSep{081.png}{69}%
+engines, where the most of the weight of the wheel is
+in the rim, the velocity of the latter would be equal to
+its circumference multiplied by the number of turns
+per second or per minute. Thus if a fly-wheel, having
+nearly the whole of its weight in the rim, weighs, say, a
+ton ($2000$~lbs.), is six feet in diameter, and rotates four
+times a second, its velocity will be $75.4$~feet per second,
+and its energy will be $\dfrac{wv^2}{2g} = \dfrac{2000 × 75.4^2}{64} = 177661$
+foot-pounds, an amount of energy which is stored up,
+\Pagelabel{69}%
+and may be drawn upon to prevent fluctuations in
+speed to which engines in workshops are liable.
+
+If a body having rectilinear motion be left to itself
+in the air, it will speedily be brought to rest, for gravity
+will bring it to the earth whether it be moving this way
+or that. The air, too, will retard its motion, and would
+ultimately bring it to rest if nothing else did, as it
+would either of the other kinds of motion. If, however,
+one could contrive to give to a body above the atmosphere
+a sufficient velocity in a tangential direction, the
+body would become a satellite, and revolve round the
+\index{Satellite}%
+earth. The curvature of the earth is about eight
+\index{Earth, curvature}%
+inches to the mile, and such a body would then need to
+move a mile in a horizontal direction in the same time
+it falls eight inches in order that it should continue to
+go about the earth. As it takes about two-tenths of a
+second to fall this distance, its velocity would need to be
+five miles a second to prevent it from falling to the
+earth; this velocity would carry it quite round the earth
+in a little less than an hour and a half.
+
+Thus it is seen that, in order that matter should
+\DPPageSep{082.png}{70}%
+\index{Energy, factors of}%
+\index{Motion, laws of}%
+possess energy, it must have motion of some kind;
+indeed, that energy has two factors, mass and motion.
+When either of these is zero, there is no energy. This
+is a consideration of great importance both in a scientific
+sense and a philosophical one. One may often
+hear it said and read it in carefully written books that
+matter and energy are the two realities or physical
+things in the universe, and energy is spoken of as if it
+were an entity, or something that might exist though
+there were no substance to move. If energy be a
+product, and motion be one of the factors, then in the
+absence of this there is no energy. This perhaps will
+be seen still clearer after considering what are called
+the laws of motion, which were first formulated by
+Newton, and which, in conjunction with the law of
+gravitation, were the fundamental principles that
+enabled him to produce the ``Principia,'' which is what
+\index{Principia}%
+to-day we would call a treatise on mechanics.
+
+Of course, the science of mechanics is applicable to
+motions of matter of any magnitude and in any place;
+and Newton chose to follow out his newly discovered
+principles into astronomy to the largest extent, and it
+remained for later generations to employ the same principles
+in other directions, largely molecular and atomic.
+
+The first law of motion is, that whether a body be in
+a state of rest or of motion, it will remain in that state
+of rest or motion until compelled by the action of some
+other body upon it to change its state. This is sometimes
+expressed by saying that all matter has \emph{inertia},
+\index{Inertia}%
+\Pagelabel{70}%
+or an inability to move or change its direction or velocity
+if it has motion. This appears to be experimentally
+\DPPageSep{083.png}{71}%
+\index{Explosion products}%
+true of all bodies whose magnitude and state
+we can see. But it may very well be doubted if the
+ordinary conception of the inertness of matter be true.
+Many of the facts of chemistry indicate that matter in
+its atomic form is not altogether so helpless as it has
+been supposed to be. A stone may lie in the road for
+an indefinite time and no one would suspect it possessed
+any energy to do anything, and so of any other kind of
+matter. Here is a piece of charcoal. Has it inertness in
+any extreme sense of that word? Here is some sulphur
+and some nitrate of potash; they, too, will lie as
+quiescent as the coal and as long. Pulverize them and
+mix them together, and we have powder the energy of
+which would wreck a building. The products of the
+explosion are gaseous mostly, and the carbon, the sulphur,
+and the nitrate of potash have vanished as such,
+and have entered suddenly into new combinations;
+they have developed also a large amount of heat, while
+at the beginning their temperature was that of other
+bodies around them. This source of energy must have
+been resident in the atoms; and if it is perceived that
+for a body to have energy it is necessary for it to have
+motion of some sort, it will be apparent that the
+material itself must have possessed a large amount of
+motion, even when it appeared to be at rest. If one
+thinks that the law of inertia might still apply to atoms,
+and that they cannot individually move except as they
+are acted upon by other atoms, and even then only as
+much as by the measure of the motion thus imparted,
+he had better figure out to himself the energy of such
+explosions per molecule, and see if anything initially
+done will account for it.
+\DPPageSep{084.png}{72}%
+\index{Motion, antecedent of}%
+\index{Top, sleep of}%
+\index{Vortex rings, properties of}%
+
+When the mechanism of a clock is running, the
+motion may be traced to a falling weight, and the work
+done is measured by the product of the weights into
+the distance it falls as the clock runs down; but in
+the case of the powder, though the amount of energy
+developed by the explosion is definite, it is not measured
+by the work done in pulverizing and mixing and igniting
+it. The case is much more nearly analogous to
+that of a sleeping man. While asleep he would neither
+move nor stop moving unless some other agency acted
+upon him, any more than would a stone or other mass
+of matter; and in that sense he would be inert, yet no
+one would think of calling a sleeping man inert, except
+in a very loose sense.
+
+Furthermore, there is an experimental analogy that
+may help one to see a little deeper into this. Every
+one knows what is meant by the ``sleep'' of a spinning
+top. It appears to be absolutely at rest, and may not
+even hum; but touch it, and the effect upon it will be
+out of all proportion to the slightness of the touch.
+
+It has been observed as a property of vortex rings that
+they have a tendency to move forward in the direction
+of their axes, and when prevented from going forward
+they press upon the body that arrests them. If they
+be brought to rest, and then the barrier be removed,
+\emph{they, of their own accord}, start on in the same direction
+as if pushed from behind. Such a body cannot be
+said to be inert without modifying the common meaning
+of the word.
+
+This is not alluded to here as proving anything; but
+inasmuch as the vortex-ring theory of matter has a good
+\DPPageSep{085.png}{73}%
+\index{Motion, laws of}%
+probability in its favor, this property I have mentioned
+helps one to understand how the atoms might be other
+than inert, and yet large bodies of them together exhibit
+that property with the rigorousness our observations
+upon such bodies demonstrate. Suppose each
+atom had the ability to move forward of its own impulse
+when not acted on by any other atom. If there
+were a million atoms joined together, no matter how,
+provided they were promiscuously faced, they would
+mutually neutralize each other's ability to move in any
+direction, and the resultant of the whole would be that
+passivity which we call inertness.
+
+We may by and by see that there may be still other
+good reasons for thinking matter not to be so passive
+as it has been often assumed to be.
+
+The second law of motion is, when two or more
+bodies act upon a third body, the effect of each is the
+same as if it alone acted, and the combined effect is
+called the resultant; and the third law is, that action
+and reaction are always equal and opposite in direction.
+This third condition of action, or the relation of
+motions in two bodies, is of a high degree of philosophical
+importance, perhaps not more so than the others,
+but of so much that it is worth while to attend to it
+more particularly than to the second law. If a rope be
+tied to the wall and one pulls upon it so as to make it
+taut, the wall pulls back in the opposite direction as
+much as the arm pulls forward. A spring-balance
+attached to the wall would indicate the strength of the
+pull, the pull of the arm representing the action, and
+measured by the muscular vibration, as already described,
+\DPPageSep{086.png}{74}%
+and the pull of the wall representing the
+reaction, and equal to the action in quantity and maintained
+by molecular vibration. Imagine the action of
+the arm to be steadily increasing in quantity: the
+reaction of the wall would correspondingly increase
+until the molecular tension could no longer be increased,
+and either the rope would break, the hook be pulled out
+from the wall, or the wall itself be broken away; but in
+no case could the action exceed the reaction or \textit{vice
+versa}. Now, if the amount of matter in the arm were a
+constant quantity, as well as that of the rope, the hook,
+and the wall, then it would follow that all the physical
+changes noted in either the one or the other, so far as
+energy is concerned, must be due to the motions involved
+on either side. And if action and reaction be
+equal, and the quantity of matter be uniform, then the
+amount of motion involved must be equal on the two
+sides. If a body in motion strikes another body, and
+the second one is set in motion, the amount of motion in
+the two will be just equal to the amount of motion
+in the first. The amount of motion gained by one
+body is just equal to that lost by the other, and there
+has been simply an exchange of motions, one having
+gained, the other lost; the one that gained being the
+one that had less, and the one that lost having had
+more, than the other one. In books of physics it is
+customary to speak of the amount of motion a body has
+as its \textit{momentum}; and it may be measured by multiplying
+\index{Momentum}%
+the mass of the body by its velocity, and oftentimes
+one may read that in the physical exchanges that are
+all the time happening in matter the momentum is
+\DPPageSep{087.png}{75}%
+conserved; that is to say, is neither increased nor
+diminished. Seeing, therefore, that the amount of
+matter is a constant quantity, and the momentum a
+constant quantity, it follows that the amount of motion
+is constant. Motion is conserved as well as matter. If
+the amount of matter in the universe be constant, then,
+according to this statement, the amount of motion must
+be constant, and the amount of energy constant also.
+
+It is generally agreed that this statement concerning
+energy is true, and one hears often about the law of
+the conservation of energy. It seems to be less clearly
+recognized that the third law of motion implies the conservation
+of motion, provided matter is itself a constant
+quantity. But there is another condition of things that
+is as uniform as any other condition of things in
+nature that has not been recognized as a law, and yet it
+deserves to be perhaps as much or more than most
+others, since, in our experience, it is never known to
+vary; it is this: Wherever there is an interchange of
+motions between two bodies, the transfer is always
+from the one having more to the one having less. As
+exchange of motions implies transfer of energy, it follows
+that all transfers of energy of any given kind are
+from bodies having more to those having less.
+
+Cause and effect are always determined by such a
+\index{Cause and effect}%
+disposition of things, though not every one has apparently
+seen that questions involving what they please
+to call causes and effects presume a kind of antecedent
+and consequent that always work both ways at
+the same time, for there is no such thing as an isolated
+phenomenon. If everything takes place so and so
+\DPPageSep{088.png}{76}%
+because there is an exchange of motion going on,
+then this thing that now moves faster than it did has
+been acted upon by a body that had more motion in
+this direction than the former one had, and it has
+imparted some of its motion at the expense of its own
+energy. If one inquires what caused the increased
+velocity to this body, it may be said it was caused by
+the impact with another body. In like manner one
+may inquire what caused the slowing-up motions of the
+second body, and the answer still must be, the same
+impact with the first body. So, for every phenomenon
+there is a corresponding and complementary phenomenon,
+which it is just as appropriate to consider as a
+cause as it is the first, and either element is just as
+much a cause as the other, and in each and every case
+all there is involved are exchanges in the amount and
+kinds of motion in matter.
+
+There remains now the consideration of a topic
+which those who have studied physical subjects only a
+little must be more or less familiar with. The term
+``potential energy'' has been much employed within the
+last twenty years to express a certain condition of matter
+that renders it a source of energy when no motion
+is supposed to be involved: thus, where a weight is
+raised, like that of a clock, or of a stone raised to the
+roof of a house. By falling, either of them can be
+made to do work; but so long as they remain raised
+and are apparently quiescent, their stock of energy is
+measured by their weight into their height, i.e., foot-pounds;
+and this is said to be \textit{potential energy}. Examples
+of this sort are numerous. The wound-up spring
+\DPPageSep{089.png}{77}%
+\index{Energy, factors of}%
+of a clock or watch, a bent bow, compressed air or
+steam, powder, nitro-glycerine, and the like explosives,
+coal, wood, and other kinds of fuel, are all varieties of
+so-called potential energy. Let it be remembered that
+we have in natural phenomena matter and ether and
+space and time and motion. If matter and ether be
+substances, then the product of one into the other
+would signify nothing; it would be physical nonsense.
+So likewise would be the product of matter into space
+or time; and yet if matter is to be possessed of energy,
+and motion is \emph{not} one of the factors, then either space
+or time must be, and no one can imagine how energy
+can in any way depend upon time as a factor, and there
+is no degree of probability that it is or can be so; and
+hence, though we had no hint of how it might be, one
+would need to avow his belief that in some way motion
+was involved in every case where physical energy was
+involved, for in any case where it had been hitherto
+possible to trace it, it had been found to be present as
+a factor in precisely the same relations as in all other
+known cases, and hence he would avow a disbelief in
+the existence of potential energy in any other than a
+loose sense for a condition where the character of the
+motion involved was obscure. This would imply that
+all energy is kinetic, whether the character of the
+motion was determined or not. This view is now held
+by those who have taken the pains to think out the
+necessary relations that are involved in this subject.
+
+In the last edition of the ``Encyclopædia Britannica,''
+Professor Tait, who contributed the article on ``Mechanics,''
+says, ``Now, it is impossible to conceive of a truly
+\DPPageSep{090.png}{78}%
+\index{Molecular fatigue}%
+dormant form of energy whose magnitude should depend
+in any way on the unit of time; and we are therefore
+forced to the conclusion that potential energy, like
+kinetic energy, depends in some unimagined way upon
+motion;'' also, ``The conclusion which appears inevitable
+is that whatever matter may be, the other reality
+in the physical universe which is never found unassociated
+with matter depends in all its widely varied forms
+upon motion of matter;'' and in another place, ``Potential
+energy must in some way depend upon motion.''
+
+It was pointed out (on p.~67) that what was called
+physiological work is now known to depend upon
+the vibratory state of muscles in a state of tension.
+Before that explanation was known, one might have
+called such, potential energy, if it had not been for the
+sense of fatigue felt by one who was doing such physiological
+work that forbade him to assume that actual
+energy was not employed to maintain such a stress;
+and when it becomes evident, as it has, that one cannot
+press upon a table, or pull upon a rope, or bring about
+in any way a push or a strain upon matter, without
+varying the temperature of the body, it is no longer
+difficult to understand that all changes of that sort
+upon matter result in atomic and molecular stresses,
+for they are placed in abnormal positions as well as
+stretched muscles, and their energy is spent in a similar
+manner. There is a curious phenomenon exhibited
+by all bodies that are made to do atomic and molecular
+work for a considerable time. They become exhausted,
+like living things, and require rest to recover their
+properties. Thus, a tuning-fork, if kept artificially
+\DPPageSep{091.png}{79}%
+\index{Energy in the ether}%
+vibrating for some time, will stop almost instantly
+when the driving force is stopped, though at the outset
+it would continue to vibrate for a minute or more when
+left to itself. This is caused by what is called the
+fatigue of elasticity: the body loses some degree of its
+elasticity, and requires time to recover it. I have called
+the phenomenon curious. Perhaps it is no more so
+than any other phenomenon manifested by matter; but
+it is so similar to what is so characteristic of living
+things, that it almost excites one's sympathy. One
+can have compassion for an overworked and exhausted
+horse, but an overworked tuning-fork! The expression
+would seem to be wholly inapplicable, but the fact is as
+stated. The only difference between the cases is, one
+has nerves, and becomes conscious of the exhaustion,
+the other not.
+
+So far, both motion and energy have been considered
+as related to matter, and matter as defined in the first
+chapter, as distinguished from the ether, though immersed
+in it, and can by no means be isolated from it;
+but energy exists in the ether as well, as we are assured
+by many phenomena. That light requires about eight
+minutes to come to us from the sun has been proved in
+numerous ways. When it gets to the earth it is found
+to be able to impart energy to the matter it falls upon:
+it may heat it and affect it in other ways that are
+measurable, so energy gets to us from the sun, and is
+eight minutes in transit in the ether. If we do not
+call ether matter, and it has been shown that there are
+good reasons for not doing so, then it follows that
+energy exists outside of matter, and it is a proper line
+\DPPageSep{092.png}{80}%
+\index{Light, energy of}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+of inquiry to learn what shape the energy exists in,
+and what mechanical conceptions are appropriate when
+thinking about it. In matter one may isolate motions
+of various sorts. A mass of matter, say, like a baseball,
+may have translatory motion: it may vibrate or it
+may spin. In each case one may contemplate the kind
+of motion, and compute the energy involved in the
+movement, and this is true for atoms as well as larger
+masses; but when the substance is not made up of
+discrete parts, but is absolutely homogeneous with no
+interstices, and apparently incapable of changing either
+its position or its form, as there is good reason for
+thinking to be the case with the ether, it becomes
+\index{Ether}%
+much more difficult to picture to one's self just what is
+happening when motion of any sort is involved. As
+has already been said, we know that light consists of
+waves, measurable quantities, and we know how much
+energy reaches the earth from the sun and falls upon a
+square mile or square foot. There have been several
+estimates of this quantity, and it is found to be equal to
+about one hundred and thirty foot-pounds per second for
+each square foot section of sunshine. This signifies, of
+course, that that is the amount of energy in a column
+of ether one foot square and a hundred and eighty-six
+thousand miles long, for that is the amount that arrives
+per second. So one may calculate the amount of energy
+there is in a cubic mile of sunlight to be about twelve
+thousand foot-pounds, and also that the amount given
+out by the sun in a second is about four millions of
+foot-pounds, or nearly seven thousand horse-power for
+each square foot of the sun's surface. All of this energy
+\DPPageSep{093.png}{81}%
+\index{Electro-magnets}%
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+\index{Magnet, electro}%
+is handed over to the ether, which distributes it in all
+directions as undulatory movements which we call light.
+Such wave motions do not exhibit anything like what
+we call momentum as waves in water or air always do,
+and they are therefore in striking contrast with waves
+in matter. Moreover, being waves, having the amplitude
+at right angles to the direction of propagation,
+they must be compounded of two motions,---a rectilinear
+and a vibratory one,---and not a simple one such
+as a particle of matter may have.
+
+The ether is capable of being affected by other
+motions of matter than simply the vibratory one of
+atoms and molecules.
+
+Whenever an electro-magnet is made, it reacts upon
+the ether in such a way as to affect other matter that
+chances to be in the range of ether so affected. It
+appears as if the ether were thrown into a state of
+stress which it retains so long as the magnet retains its
+property; and this condition extends to an indefinite
+distance in all directions. If such an electro-magnet is
+made and unmade by opening and closing an electric
+current in its coils, there will be formed a set of electro-magnetic
+waves in the ether which will travel outwards
+from the magnet in a manner similar to light-waves,
+only they will have an enormous wave length. If the
+circuit be closed but once a second, the waves will be a
+hundred and eighty-six thousand miles long; for a wave
+in the ether travels in it with a velocity that depends
+solely upon the property of the ether to transmit disturbances,
+and not at all upon the source of the disturbance.
+That such an electro-magnetic wave possesses
+\DPPageSep{094.png}{82}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+energy, and can do work, one may satisfy himself by
+observing the motions produced by them upon magnetic
+needles within the affected space.
+
+In like manner an electrified body puts the ether into
+a different kind of a stress from the magnet; and when
+this is done periodically, as it may be by an induction
+coil, and in other ways, electrostatic waves are set up,
+and these too travel with the speed of light, and are
+capable of affecting matter to a great distance, thus
+showing that the ether may possess energy in an electro-static
+form, as distinguished from the electro-magnetic
+and light. There are some physicists who think these
+last two to be identical, and the reasons for their
+opinion will be given in a subsequent place.
+
+It only remains to point out that whatever the nature
+of gravity may be, there can be very little doubt that
+the ether is intimately concerned in it, as Sir Isaac
+Newton supposed was the case. But if it is, and ether
+is the agency by which one mass of matter is able to
+affect another mass, then ether is in a state of stress
+produced by the atoms of matter all the time, and
+therefore in some way gravitative energy is lodged in it.
+As the ether is so universal in its extension, one cannot
+but see that it is a storehouse of an almost unlimited
+amount of energy of many kinds; so that if every
+particle of matter were instantly annihilated, there
+would still be a universe filled with energy, though it
+might not be serviceable, because lacking the conditions
+for transformation into useful forms. This may
+be said to be one of the functions of matter---the transformation
+of the energy it gets from the ether.
+%\DPPageSep{095.png}{83}%
+
+
+\Chapter{V}{Gravitation}{83}
+
+\index{Attraction, gravitative}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+
+\First{That} all bodies will fall towards the earth if raised
+above its surface and left unsupported everybody
+knows and must always have known, for it is a fact
+thrust into everybody's notice constantly and as long
+as he lives. Also that bodies resting upon the earth
+require energy to be spent in order to raise them
+from it is equally well known. Thus all bodies act as
+if they were attracted by the earth, and the weight of
+a body is the measure of the attraction of the earth
+upon it.
+
+One not unfrequently comes across statements by
+authors implying that Newton was the discoverer of
+this attraction which is called gravitation. This is a
+mistake: not only was this idea common in Newton's
+day, but the word itself was in extensive use. Kepler
+had affirmed that the sun attracted the earth and the
+planets, and Galileo had busied himself very much
+with the study of attraction of the earth upon bodies.
+The problem that Newton had before him was not
+as to the existence of gravitative action, but what
+was its law of operation and the limits of it, if it had
+any limits. The familiar story of the fall of the apple
+leading to the great discovery is generally believed to
+\DPPageSep{096.png}{84}%
+\index{Gravitation, law of}%
+be mythical; at any rate, other facts well authenticated
+do not accord with that story. When he was twenty-three
+years old he undertook to apply the law as we
+now have it, to the moon, using the size of the earth
+and the moon's distance from it, as they were then
+best known. The result satisfied him that his surmise
+could not be the law, if the measure of the earth then
+had was accurate. This was in 1666. In 1683 he
+learned of some new measures recently made of the
+magnitude of the earth, indicating it to be larger than
+had been supposed. Then, with the new measures for
+data, he made a new computation. It was then, when
+he saw that the results were to prove his conjecture,
+and he perceived the immense importance of the discovery,
+that he handed over the unfinished work to an
+amanuensis, because he was too much agitated to complete
+it. If the discovery was made when he first
+thought of putting the idea to the test, it is strange
+that his emotional excitement should have been postponed
+for seventeen years. Evidently it was at the
+latter date when he thought he had made the discovery.
+It was the \emph{law} of gravitation that Newton discovered,
+and that it was universal. Every particle of matter
+attracts every other particle; and the strength of this
+attraction varies as the mass of each, and inversely as
+the square of the distance between them. Thus, if at
+the surface of the earth gravitation gives a weight of
+one pound to a body, at the distance of ten radii of the
+earth $= 40000$~miles, the weight would be $\dfrac{1}{10^2}$, one-hundredth
+of a pound, and at the distance of the moon,
+\DPPageSep{097.png}{85}%
+\index{Attraction depends upon distance}%
+or sixty radii of the earth, the body would weigh but
+$\dfrac{1}{60^2}$=one thirty-six hundredth of a pound, and would
+fall towards the earth in a second but $\dfrac{1}{3600}$ of the distance
+it would fall at the surface of the earth, where it
+is about sixteen feet. One thirty-six hundredth of sixteen
+feet is about the one $\dfrac{1}{224}$ of a foot, which is
+therefore the departure from a straight line the
+body at the distance of the moon must make per
+second to move round the earth. The mutual attraction
+of these bodies at that distance is sufficient to produce
+this amount of deflection, and hence accounts for
+the rotation at that distance. When the same mathematical
+relation is applied to the planets, comets, and
+meteors that revolve about the sun, it is found to be
+applicable to every one of them; and in the depths of
+space in every direction are to be seen multitudes of
+stars revolving about each other in similar manner, and
+hence it is concluded that gravitation is a universal property,
+and the law is applicable throughout the universe.
+
+There are other kinds of attraction that matter
+exhibits, such as electric and magnetic, that follow a
+part of the above law, but do not the other part. The
+law regarding the distance is true for electrified bodies,
+but the mass of the bodies does not enter as a controlling
+condition. So it appears that the variability of
+attraction with the distance is a geometrical condition,
+and depends upon the property of space, and is not
+peculiar to any physical phenomenon. Sound, light,
+\DPPageSep{098.png}{86}%
+heat, electricity, magnetism, as well as gravitation,
+exhibit the property, as do circles and spheres. The
+peculiar thing about gravitative attraction is that it
+depends upon the masses of the attracting bodies, and
+is not modified in the slightest degree by the interposition
+of any substance of any magnitude between the
+attracting particles or masses. In this particular it is
+strikingly unlike magnetic attraction. If, for instance,
+a piece of iron is brought between two magnets that at
+a distance are attracting each other, the strength of
+their action upon each other is decidedly less. The
+strength of the attraction of the sun is just as great
+upon a particle in the centre of the earth as for any
+similar particle at an equal distance that is not
+shielded.
+
+There have been numerous attempts in the past to
+account for gravitation. It has been imagined that
+space was full of particles swiftly moving in every direction
+that produced a pressure upon all bodies by their
+impact; that each body shielded other bodies in a measure,
+and hence the pressure produced upon the adjacent
+sides would be less than elsewhere, and, as a consequence,
+each body would be pushed in the direction of
+an adjacent body. But a push represents expended
+energy, and this would imply that the moving particles
+must be losing energy at the expense of their velocity;
+and as no such particles are known, and if there were,
+their velocity would have to be so much greater than
+that of light, there is no degree of probability to be
+allowed for the idea. The effect of vibrations upon
+the ether has been a very common manner of attempting
+\DPPageSep{099.png}{87}%
+\index{Attraction of vibrating fork}%
+to explain gravitation. It has been observed that if
+light bodies are brought near to a vibrating body like a
+tuning-fork, they are apparently attracted by it so long
+as the vibratory motion continues; and the action is
+explained by the rarefaction produced by the vibratory
+motion, which reduces the pressure in the space about
+the body, so when another body is brought near the
+pressure is greater on the remote side than it is on
+the side adjacent, and thus the body is pushed towards
+the one vibrating. It is known that all the atoms of all
+bodies are in a state of vibration at all temperatures;
+and hence it was inferred that the pressure of the ether
+must be reduced next to their surface, so that between
+two atoms or molecules the pressure must be less than
+external to them, and hence the pressure of the ether
+will crowd them together. This idea has been worked
+out by a large number of persons in different countries.
+There are two fatal objections to this hypothesis:
+First, it would make the attraction of gravitation
+dependent upon their temperature, and there is no evidence
+to show that temperature makes any difference;
+and second, that the velocity of gravitative action is the
+same as that of light. There is an abundance of astronomical
+evidence, that if it has any velocity at all it
+must vastly exceed that of light. If it were as much
+as a million times greater, astronomical phenomena
+would exhibit it plainly.
+
+Seeing that every particle of matter in the universe,
+affects every other particle in a certain and definite
+way, no matter what the distance between them, there
+must be either the possibility that a body can act upon
+\DPPageSep{100.png}{88}%
+\index{Newton, Sir Isaac}%
+another one at a distance without any medium between
+them,---which is called action at a distance,---or there
+\index{Action at a distance}%
+must be a medium which is first affected by the bodies,
+and which in turn reacts upon other bodies in it.
+What Sir Isaac Newton thought of these contingencies
+was cited in a former chapter (see \Pageref{p.}{31}). It
+is now generally felt to be not only essential for consistent
+mechanical thinking, but that in some way the
+ether which is known to exist must have some essential
+part in the phenomenon. It has been the subject
+of curious speculation why Newton should so strongly
+state his belief in the existence of a medium for the
+propagation of physical conditions, and yet in his work
+on light he should adopt the corpuscular theory---that
+light consisted of emanations, which was a practical
+denial of the hypothesis of the ether. The explanation
+of the anomaly is probably in the fact, that he
+could treat in his mathematical way the ideal corpuscles,
+while he could not so treat the ether hypothesis of
+waves. His work was developed with ideas he could
+handle; and the outcome of it was that the science of
+light was retarded by his misconceptions for a hundred
+years, for every one now who knows anything about it
+knows that Newton's hypothesis was a wrong one.
+There are some persons who would curb the imaginations
+of others in physical things by quoting Newton's
+dictum, ``Hypotheses I do not touch,'' but they omit to
+mention that Newton's work on optics was altogether
+based upon a hypothesis that has wholly broken
+down. Every one of the explanations he gave of
+such phenomena is worthless, and no one gives attention
+\DPPageSep{101.png}{89}%
+\index{Neptune, discovery of}%
+to them except for their historic relations to the
+science.
+
+It has been thus in other lines. A symbolic representation
+of things such as offers the possibility of
+mathematical treatment has been seized and worked out
+to great length, when the actual phenomena pretended
+to be treated gave no countenance to the conceptions.
+Such has been the case in electricity and magnetism and
+heat. The mathematicians fought Ohm's, Faraday's,
+and Joule's mechanical conceptions until death stopped
+them.
+
+It is certainly true that all physical phenomena are
+subject to strictly mathematical conditions, and mathematical
+processes are unassailable in themselves. The
+trouble arises from the data employed. Most phenomena
+are so highly complex that one can never be
+quite sure he is dealing with all the factors until
+experiment proves it. So that experiment is rather a
+criterion of mathematical conclusions and must lead
+the way. Mathematics is a deductive science, yet the
+\index{Mathematics}%
+number of physical facts or phenomena that have been
+discovered by its aid is so small that they may almost
+be left out of the count. There is the discovery of the
+planet Neptune, that has been spoken of as a triumph
+of mathematical science, yet one of the most competent
+mathematicians that ever lived---Professor Peirce of
+Harvard---declared that it was only a lucky find, for the
+computations would apply just as well to a planet $180°$~from
+it. The conical refraction of light is another
+one. Altogether they make but a small figure and
+are unimportant. The law of gravitation was discovered
+\DPPageSep{102.png}{90}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+\index{Hypothesis, gravitation}%
+\index{Kepler, the guesser}%
+by trial, and although its importance is second
+to none other yet discovered, it happens that it is one
+of the very simplest and least complicated with other
+laws we know of; but an explanation of how it can act
+thus, or why it exists at all, or what its antecedents are
+if it has any, these are questions that are matters for
+the guessers, like Kepler, who kept guessing until he
+guessed right, and so discovered what are known as his
+laws. Meanwhile definite mechanical conceptions of
+what the phenomena to be explained are like may be
+helpful to those interested in them.
+
+Suppose two bodies, \textit{A} and \textit{B}, a certain distance apart,
+and they so react upon each other that they tend to
+mutually approach each other. Given a medium, ether,
+can one imagine stresses set up by either body in the
+ether that will be capable of affecting the other?
+
+Imagine a large space like a room occupied by glass
+of uniform texture and properties throughout. If relieved
+of gravitational property, the cohesion of all
+its parts shows that every particle is in some sort of
+stress, no matter what the origin of that may be. Now,
+suppose there could suddenly be created somewhere
+near the middle of the glass a bullet or a marble. It
+would displace so much glass as would be equal to its
+own volume, and the result of that would be that the
+glass about it would be subject to a new stress, which
+would be greatest, at the surface of contact of the
+marble, and would be less as that surface is receded
+from inversely proportional to the square of the distance
+of the point of observation. If the glass be imagined to
+be indefinitely great in magnitude, then the stress would
+\DPPageSep{103.png}{91}%
+extend in every direction through the whole extent of
+it, and at any assignable point would still be in accordance
+with the inverse law, diminishing outward.
+Imagine now another similar marble to be created at
+the distance of a foot from the first. Inasmuch as it
+displaces so much glass it will set up a new stress in
+the latter, and this stress must also be transmitted
+throughout the whole mass as in the first instance.
+Now, here will be two independent stresses overlapping;
+and on account of the nature of the stress, it will be
+greater between the marbles than it will be anywhere
+else, because there the sum of the stresses will be at a
+maximum. If one can now for the moment imagine
+that the glass was of such constitution as to permit a
+motion to the marbles, in any direction, when there was
+a stress tending to move them, it would be obvious
+that the marbles would separate from each other as the
+medium, the glass, was under greater tension between
+them than in any other direction.\footnote
+ {Such bodies might be said to have \emph{negative weight}.}
+And if the glass
+thus mobile was indefinite in extent and without friction,
+the two marbles would continue to separate indefinitely.
+The energy making them thus to move comes directly
+from the medium, which in turn got it from the bodies
+themselves when they were thrust into it, no matter
+how. Such a phenomenon as separation in a manner
+like the above is exactly opposite in character to that
+of gravitation, but it points at once to a consideration
+of the condition necessary to be similar. It was the
+forcing of new material into space already occupied
+with other material that developed the stress and led
+to the above results. It will be necessary to find a way
+\DPPageSep{104.png}{92}%
+\index{Stress in glass}%
+to develop a stress \emph{towards} a point instead of away
+from it.
+
+Suppose, then, that instead of having a created something
+imbedded in it, a cavity of equal volume to the
+marble should be produced in its place. As part of the
+material of the medium has been annihilated, there will
+now be a less stress at its bounding surface than there
+was when it was occupied with material, and the
+direction of the stress will now be towards the cavity.
+That is, the stress will be less there than anywhere
+else in the glass; and this, too, if measured, will be found
+distributed like the other, inversely as the square of the
+distance from the origin. Let another similar cavity
+be produced in the neighborhood of the first, and the
+two stresses will overlap, and there will be less between
+them than in any other direction. Let us imagine now
+that the glass was mobile enough to permit the movement
+of either of these cavities in any direction towards
+which there was any pressure, and they would approach
+each other because pushed by the stress in the glass
+more towards each other than in any other direction.
+If one of these cavities were larger than the other, one
+would expect that the corresponding stress would be
+greater, and so there would be a stress that for direction
+and the resultant movement would correspond with
+what is observed in the phenomena of gravitation.
+
+But such a conception as that of a vacuum as constituting
+what we call the atoms of matter has no mechanical
+validity at all. Atoms have not only volume, they
+have mass, and that requires energy to displace. One
+cannot imagine that the displacement of an absolute
+\DPPageSep{105.png}{93}%
+\index{Stress in ether}%
+vacuum, if such a thing could be done, would require
+any energy, for there would be no mass to move.
+
+Suppose, however,---instead of imagining, as was
+done, the entire volume of the marble to be destroyed,---that
+in some way the volume of the glass marble had
+suddenly been reduced, no matter how, and that the
+diminished volume was retained,---the material had been
+condensed. This would bring about the same relative
+condition of stress to the condensed portion, so that
+there would be less adjacent to it than elsewhere, the
+measure of it being the actual amount of condensation
+represented in the body. What would be true of one
+would be true of others,---an indefinite number,---and
+no number of such stresses would in any manner interfere
+with or neutralize that of others. At any point of
+the space filled with such glass each such condensation
+would have produced its effect at the outset, and if the
+glass were practically limitless in extent this relationship
+would be maintained so long as the reduced
+volumes remained constant.
+
+So far has been considered a condition of things
+somewhat analogous to gravitation; and to apply it one
+needs to imagine the ether to be substituted for the
+glass and the atoms of matter for the imagined condensation,
+and also that the two, the ether and atom,
+are capable of mutual reaction.
+
+There have been some physicists who have imagined
+that the atoms of matter were condensations in the
+ether, but I am not aware that any very satisfactory
+reasons have been given for thinking so. That in itself
+would be no reason for rejecting the idea in the
+\DPPageSep{106.png}{94}%
+\index{Attraction of disks}%
+\index{Hypothesis, needful}%
+absence of a better and more consistent one. For
+scientific purposes a poor hypothesis is better than
+none at all.
+
+A very large amount of scientific work has been
+done by employing hypotheses that are now known to
+be wrong. A working hypothesis is needful. If it be
+wrong, one will by and by find it out and be able to
+amend it, or replace it by a better. If it be right, it
+will be vindicated, and will justify itself, and be generally
+adopted.
+
+Until we know more definitely than is now known
+what the constitution of matter really is, one can only
+guess and try; and among the multitude of interested
+workers in all civilized countries there will be some
+who will guess right to the advantage of all.
+
+If, then, one adopts the vortex ring theory of matter,
+\index{Vortex ring theory of matter}%
+and endeavors to trace the mechanical conditions that
+might obtain with such kind of atoms, he would be
+led to inquire whether a vortex ring does or does not
+exhibit any evidence of condensation in the material
+that is in rotation; that is, does the material of the ring
+occupy the same space while it is in rotation as it does
+when not?
+
+There are several phenomena that seem to show that
+it occupies less space. The reduction of pressure
+in its neighborhood shows a rarefaction there, and the
+mutual approach of such rings and of other light bodies
+in their neighborhood indicates the same thing. If
+one rotates a disk rapidly, any light bodies in front of
+it will tend to approach it even from a distance of
+several inches. If a dozen disks five or six inches in
+\DPPageSep{107.png}{95}%
+\index{Attraction of vortex rings}%
+diameter are set loosely an inch apart upon a spindle a
+foot long, so that they may be rotated fast, yet left free
+to move longitudinally upon the spindle, they will all
+crowd up close together as the pressure is less between
+them than outside. If one can imagine the spindle to
+be flexible and the ends brought opposite each other
+while rotating, it will be seen that the ends would
+exhibit an apparent attraction for each other, and,
+if free to approach, would close up, thus making a
+vortex ring with the sections of disks. If the axis
+of the disks were shrinkable, the whole thing would
+contract to a minimum size that would be determined
+by the rapidity of the rotary movement, in
+which case not only would it be plain why the ring form
+was maintained, but why the diameter of the ring
+as a whole should shrink. So long as it rotated it
+would keep up a stress in the air about it. So far as
+the experimental evidence goes, it appears that a vortex
+ring in the air exhibits the phenomenon in question.
+There is no doubt at all that two vortex rings in the
+air attract each other, for they will mutually approach
+if free to do so, and the explanation is plain that there is
+reduced pressure between them; in other words, the
+characteristic motion of the ring reduces the air
+pressure about it, so that another body within that field
+is pushed towards the place where the pressure is
+least. The reduction of the pressure about any ring
+must evidently depend upon the amount of material
+embodied in it, and more especially the degree of
+rotation which it has. A small, thin but rapidly
+rotating ring might produce as great a rarefaction about
+\DPPageSep{108.png}{96}%
+it as a much larger one with less velocity, hence there
+is something about it that corresponds to what is called
+mass. It is not \emph{simply} an amount of material, but the
+\emph{energy} the material has, which gives it its characteristic
+properties.
+
+Analogy must not be mistaken for identity. There
+is so great a difference between the properties of the
+air and other gases and those of the ether that one
+cannot affirm that what holds true of one must hold
+true of the other; yet that is what is generally done by
+such persons as those who try to show the properties
+of the ether to be identical with those of matter.
+
+We know what conditions are necessary in order that
+a ring should be formed in the air, and one of them is
+that there must be gaseous friction. If that were not
+the case a ring could not be formed. If the ether be
+the frictionless medium it is generally supposed to be,
+one would not know how to make a vortex ring in it.
+On the other hand, the reason a ring in the air is so
+soon destroyed is because of friction; and hence if one
+were made in some unimagined way in the ether it
+would continue to exist indefinitely, but how it could
+act at all upon the ether surrounding it would be a
+mechanical puzzle, and that is the present state of the
+case. The puzzle is no greater with the conception of
+a vortex ring than if the atom were made up in some
+other way, and therefore that objection is not peculiar
+to this hypothesis. It has been confessedly a puzzle
+to see how the vibratory motions of atoms and molecules
+could set up transverse waves in the ether if the
+ether be without friction; nevertheless, they do set up
+\DPPageSep{109.png}{97}%
+such waves. A common objection to all attempts that
+have been made to account for gravitation by means of
+the motions of the atoms themselves is that it not
+only requires a constant expenditure of energy, but that
+the velocity of transmission must be so much greater
+than that of light. Light is transverse vibratory movement.
+A direct longitudinal wave may be much swifter
+than the other. A pull upon a taut rope will travel
+much faster in it than will a wave produced by a transverse
+movement of the hand.
+
+It is not to be understood that what is presented here
+is given as a proof that gravitation is but a simple
+mechanical condition of things. It is probable that
+every one who thinks about it believes that its explanation
+is purely mechanical. Some perhaps are pessimistic,
+and doubt that man will ever be able to understand
+its mysteries, but pessimists are not discoverers. They
+frequently so chill the air about them that more hopeful
+ones, who are not persuaded that the end has yet
+been reached, are sometimes deterred from venturing
+into fields where they have to pass such self-constituted
+gate-keepers.
+
+There are few physical problems of any generality
+and complexity that are abruptly and completely solved
+by one person. Tentative steps must be taken, and
+much labor is oftentimes spent upon ideas that by and
+by are proved to be worthless. A good deal of the
+work done by Laplace upon the Nebula theory was
+\index{Nebula theory}%
+of that sort; yet all astronomers hold the Nebula theory
+in some form: what the exact process was, if solely
+mechanical, may be interesting, but not very important
+from a philosophical standpoint.
+\DPPageSep{110.png}{98}%
+
+So one may hold that gravitation is a mechanical
+action, and in some way explainable on mechanical
+principles, even if he does not see how at all.
+
+This chapter may help some to see not only what
+the character of the problem is, but what factors are
+present, and how somewhat similar phenomena may be
+reproduced at will; but the radical distinction that
+exists between the ether and matter must always be
+kept in mind.
+%\DPPageSep{111.png}{99}%
+
+
+\Chapter{VI}{Heat}{99}
+
+\index{Heat, mechanical origin of}%
+
+\First{Heat} and cold are two words we apply to contrasted
+sensations, either of which may imply comfort or discomfort;
+and what is meant by either word in a given
+case depends altogether upon what the sensation is
+compared with. Thus, one would speak of a day when
+the thermometer indicated one hundred degrees in the
+shade as being a hot day, while if his cup of coffee had
+the same temperature it would be called cold; so the
+terms imply only roughly some departure from a
+standard of comfort. To obtain more definite knowledge
+of that physical condition which gives us the
+sensation we call heat, it is necessary to attend to its
+origin and its effects upon other bodies.
+
+\Section{I. MECHANICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+When a blacksmith hammers a small piece of iron,
+like a nail, upon his anvil, it becomes too hot to hold,
+and it even may be made to glow, red-hot, by the
+repeated blows of the hammer. If a bullet be shot
+against a target and be quickly picked up, it is found to
+be hot; and in general the impact of any two bodies
+always results in heating both of them. In the above
+cases both the hammer and the target are heated, but
+\DPPageSep{112.png}{100}%
+on account of their size the degree of heat is not so
+noticeable as it is with the smaller bodies.
+
+In like manner if the knuckles be rubbed briskly
+upon one's sleeve, the sensation of heat becomes
+unbearable in a very brief time. The friction of the
+surfaces develops the heat, as may be learned by
+taking a button or some similar object, and in the same
+brisk manner rub it on the sleeve or other convenient
+surface, and it will get too hot to be safely touched
+against the skin. On a larger scale the brakes upon
+railroad-cars exhibit the same quality when they have
+been applied for a few seconds. The sparks that may
+be seen flying from them in the dark is testimony to
+the same thing; while the car-wheel boxes are often so
+heated by the constant friction when the lubricating
+oil is wanting, that the cotton waste takes fire, and
+even locomotives may be delayed by their hot journals.
+This source of heat is so common that instances may
+be cited indefinitely. It is universally true that the
+friction of one body moving in contact with another
+heats them both, and the heat developed depends upon
+the pressure and the velocity of the moving surfaces.
+It is true not only for solids, but for liquids and gases
+as well, and the friction of solids moving in either
+liquids or gases. An extreme case of the latter kind is
+illustrated by the shining trail of a meteor when it
+enters the atmosphere. Its velocity is very great---twenty
+or thirty miles a second---and the friction of the
+air is so great on account of the high speed that it
+renders the surface of the meteorite red-hot, and some
+of its molecules are ground off as they would be if it
+\DPPageSep{113.png}{101}%
+were held against a swift turning emery-wheel that
+scatters the sparks in the air. The luminous trail consists
+of these heated particles. If the body is not large,
+and most meteors are quite small, they may be entirely
+ground to powder and dissipated before they can reach
+the earth. Most meteors in this way rarely pass
+through more than fifty or sixty miles of our atmosphere
+before this happens.
+
+Another mechanical source of heat is compression.
+Let a bullet be hard squeezed in a vise, or in any other
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[htb]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{4in}{113a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{4}{Diag.\ 4.}
+\end{figure}
+way, and it is found that its heat is perceptibly increased.
+Small differences of this sort may be easily detected
+by the use of the thermopile and galvanometer.
+
+The rubbed button or pounded or squeezed bullet
+placed upon the face of the thermopile shows the presence
+of an amount of heat which the sense of heat
+would %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[11]{l}{.5in}
+\null\hfill\Graphic{.25in}{114a}\hfill
+ \Caption{5}{Diag.\ 5.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+never detect. Gases exhibit the heating effect
+through pressure in a high degree. Before the invention
+of friction matches, which are themselves good
+\DPPageSep{114.png}{102}%
+\index{Heat, chemical origin of}%
+examples of the production of heat by friction, metallic
+tubes, closed at one end with a tight-fitting plunger to
+be worked by hand, were in common use for lighting
+fires. A bit of punky wood was fixed to the
+end of the plunger, and the latter was then
+quickly driven to the bottom of the tube. The
+air was compressed to so great an extent that
+the heat developed became sufficient to ignite
+the punk. The same heating effect of compression
+may be shown by the thermopile and galvanometer
+by compressing the air with an air-condenser,
+and permitting the air thus condensed to
+strike on its exit upon the face of the pile.
+
+Thus impact, or \emph{sudden} stopping of mechanical
+motion, friction, or the \emph{gradual} stopping of mechanical
+motion and condensation, or compelling molecules
+to occupy less space, all of them of a purely
+mechanical nature, result invariably in heating the
+matter that is subject to the action.
+
+\Section{II. CHEMICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+The heat that results from the combustion of fuels
+of all sorts is due to the chemical changes that take
+place. When coal burns, its substance, carbon, is
+entering into combination with the oxygen of the air,
+and a new chemical product is formed called carbon
+dioxide, which is a gas; and the change is accompanied
+by the production of a large amount of heat, which we
+utilize for our comfort or for the various arts that
+depend upon heat as an agent. Wood, alcohol, the
+various oils,---everything capable of burning, and which
+\DPPageSep{115.png}{103}%
+may be called fuels---are, in the process of burning,
+\index{Fuels}%
+undergoing what is called oxidation, in which new
+chemical compounds are formed and which are nearly
+all gaseous. Thus the products of the combustion of
+\index{Combustion}%
+wood, alcohol, coal-oil, etc., are always carbon dioxide
+gas, and the vapor of water; and the heat developed is
+proportionate to the amount of these produced.
+
+But combustion is not the only chemical source. If
+sulphuric acid be mixed with water, the compound
+becomes very hot although it is liquid. The two
+substances enter into an intimate chemical combination.
+A pint of each mixed together will not make a quart,
+but will fall short of that volume a good deal when
+they have cooled. This shows that condensation has
+taken place; and, knowing that condensation produces
+heat when brought about in other ways, one might have
+suspected that chemical condensation would result in
+a similar development of heat.
+
+Some substances when in a finely divided state,
+though what we generally call solids, are capable of
+entering into combination with each other at a very
+rapid rate and then develop a great deal of heat.
+Such a substance as gunpowder, a combination of carbon,
+\index{Gunpowder}%
+sulphur, and the nitrate of potash, when intimately
+mixed, will combine with explosive violence, and great
+heat results from it, as shown by the attending flash
+and the scorching effects it produces upon some bodies
+that do not happen to be destroyed by the explosion.
+All chemical reactions whatever involve in some degree
+temperature changes; and by so much one might be
+led to suspect that there might not be so great a
+\DPPageSep{116.png}{104}%
+\index{Heat, electrical origin of}%
+difference between the mechanical \DPtypo{souces}{sources} of heat at
+first considered and the more obscure chemical ones as
+one might think who attends only to the more prominent
+features of the two. If one should adopt for
+a basis of his philosophy that like causes produce like
+effects, what shall he say when he sees the same effect
+produced by pounding with a hammer, condensing a
+gas, and burning a piece of wood? Either unlike causes
+can produce similar effects, or fundamentally these
+three processes are the same. We will attend to that
+question more at length farther on.
+
+
+\Section{III\@. ELECTRICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+As a chapter is to be given to electricity and its
+phenomena, it will be sufficient here to point out that
+wherever a current of electricity is flowing in a conductor,
+there heat is invariably produced. The heat in
+an electric arc is so great that all known substances are
+either fused or volatilized in it. Gold, platinum, the
+ruby, are easily reduced to the liquid form, and the
+diamond slowly wastes away, being oxidized like a piece
+of coal. Electric furnaces are now in use where the
+most refractory substances, like clay, are reduced, and
+the metal aluminum extracted from it. So long as it
+cost so much to produce electricity as it did before the
+dynamo was perfected, no one could afford to use it for
+heating purposes. Now there will shortly be electric
+heaters in houses, replacing stoves for cooking and
+furnaces for warmth. The electrical current can be
+brought on the wire where it is wanted, and the heat
+developed from it to any degree desired. Electricity,
+then, is another source of heat.
+\DPPageSep{117.png}{105}%
+\index{Energy in the ether}%
+\index{Heat, radiational origin of}%
+
+
+\Section{IV\@. RADIATIVE ORIGIN.}
+
+When one stands near a blazing fire the warmth felt
+does not come from the heated air between the fire
+and the person; for when one shields his face or hands
+the warmth ceases to be felt, though the temperature
+of the air might be the same in both cases.
+
+In like manner sunshine warms the earth, although
+between the sun and the earth there is an enormous
+space without air or other matter, through which the
+sun's rays come producing warmth \emph{when they get here}.
+This process of giving out rays to the ether independent
+of matter, which is possessed by hot bodies, is called
+radiation. It has been shown that all bodies are at all
+times giving out such radiations; and oftentimes the
+radiation itself is called radiant energy, sometimes it
+is called light, and sometimes simply ether waves.
+Here we do not attend to the origin of the waves, but
+to the fact that when such waves fall upon matter they
+result in heating it, and therefore radiation must be
+looked upon as a fourth source of heat.
+
+I would again suggest the thought presented a page
+or two back, as to the similarity or dissimilarity of each
+of these four kinds of origins of heat,---mechanical,
+chemical, electrical, radiant. They appear to be utterly
+unlike each other, yet their effects upon matter are identical,
+always thus and never different, so far as our experience
+goes. Evidently there must be some factor
+common to them all; and if this could be known for any
+one of them, it would throw light upon all the rest. If
+we take, for instance, the mechanical origin of heat,
+\DPPageSep{118.png}{106}%
+say, impact, which is one of the most obvious, and note
+the factors present, it is plain there are but two;
+namely, a mass of matter with a certain measurable
+amount of motion of the translational variety. These
+two embody the energy represented by the impact, and
+of these the translational motion is destroyed when the
+heat appears. The other factor, the mass of matter,
+remains constant. The motion that was seen needs to
+be accounted for; and as the heat that appears is the
+result of that motion, it appears probable that in some
+way the translational motion has been transformed into
+some other kind of motion, not that it has been annihilated.
+
+
+\Section{TEMPERATURE.}
+\index{Temperature}%
+
+If a pint of boiling-hot water be mixed with a pint
+of ice-cold water, the mixture will have all the heat
+there was in the pint of hot water, but it would not
+injure the hand thrust into it. The heat that was in
+one pint has been distributed through two pints, and
+hence each pint has one-half the heat that was in the
+hot pint. A red-hot bar of iron will be cooled by being
+thrust into a pail of water. The water will be heated,
+and will have all the heat the bar lost; but as it is distributed
+through so great a volume of water, the
+amount of heat in a cubic inch of it will be but a small
+proportion of the whole.
+
+The word ``temperature'' is used to denote the degree
+of heat there may be in a unit volume of a substance, and
+this is measured by means of thermometers in which
+the property that heat possesses of expanding the volume
+of bodies is made to indicate their degree of heat. The
+\DPPageSep{119.png}{107}%
+standard for this is an arbitrary one altogether. In the
+common Fahrenheit thermometer there is a tube of glass
+\index{Thermometer}%
+with a bulb upon it filled with mercury. This, when put
+into ice-water, acquires the same temperature, and the
+mercury stands at a certain height in the tube, which is
+marked. Then it is put into boiling-hot water, where
+the mercury expands and reaches another height in the
+tube, which is also marked. The space between the
+two marks is divided into one hundred and eighty equal
+parts, and the same scale of division is carried beyond
+in both directions. A point thirty-two of these divisions
+below the mark of the melting ice is called zero;
+so between it and the boiling-point are two hundred
+and twelve divisions, called degrees. The centigrade
+thermometer is more generally used in scientific work.
+In this the space between the freezing and boiling
+points is divided into one hundred equal parts, called
+also degrees. A centigrade degree is $\dfrac{9}{5}$~larger than a
+Fahrenheit degree. The scales of either may be extended
+indefinitely for the measurement of temperatures
+departing from the more usual ones. For a lower
+limit one cannot use the mercury below about forty
+degrees below zero; for it freezes at that temperature,
+and no longer follows the same law of contraction. As
+alcohol does not freeze, thermometer tubes filled with
+it are used to indicate such low temperature. In the
+Arctic regions, and even in Siberia, the temperature
+falls to fifty or sixty degrees below zero not infrequently
+in winter, but temperatures have artificially been produced
+as low as $400°$~below zero.
+\DPPageSep{120.png}{108}%
+
+For the higher limits mercury thermometers can be
+used for higher temperatures than alcohol, for the latter
+boils and becomes vapor at~$174°$. The following table
+of temperatures may be interesting:---
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{p{3in}@{\ }r}%[** PP: Hard-coded width]
+Absolute zero \dotfill & $-460°$ \\
+Lowest degree artificially produced \dotfill & $-400°$ \\
+Lowest degree measured in Siberia \dotfill & $-72°$ \\
+Mercury freezes \dotfill & $-39°$ \\
+Water freezes \dotfill & $32°$ \\
+Blood in man \dotfill & $98.6°$ \\
+Temperature observed in India \dotfill & $140°$ \\
+Alcohol boils \dotfill & $174°$ \\
+Water boils \dotfill & $212°$ \\
+Lead melts \dotfill & $612°$ \\
+Mercury boils \dotfill & $650°$ \\
+Red heat visible in dark \dotfill & $1000°$ \\
+Silver melts \dotfill & $1873°$ \\
+Gold melts \dotfill & $2200°$ \\
+Iron melts \dotfill & $2700°$ \\
+Platinum melts \dotfill & $3600°$ \\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+\index{Temperature, table}%
+
+Gases, like liquids and solids, are increased in volume
+by heat when permitted to expand. If not permitted,
+the pressure upon the walls of the containing vessel is
+increased; and it is found that this pressure is proportionate
+to the temperature, and also that the pressure
+diminishes about~$\dfrac{1}{273}$ for each centigrade degree of cooling,
+starting at the freezing-point of water. If, therefore,
+a gas could be cooled from that point $273°$~centigrade,
+it would have no pressure, as it would have no
+temperature. Such a degree has never yet been reached;
+but all phenomena having any bearing upon the subject
+\DPPageSep{121.png}{109}%
+indicate that at~$-273°$ there is no heat: it is an
+absolute zero. The molecules %[** PP: Width-dependent line break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{0.5in}
+\null\hfill\Graphic{0.25in}{121a}
+\Caption{6}{Diag.\ 6.}%
+\end{wrapfigure}
+would have no translational
+motion, otherwise they would produce
+some pressure upon the walls of the vessel that
+contained them. Air thermometers may be
+\index{Thermometer, air}%
+made with bulbs blown upon the end of a glass
+tube. A small drop of water in the tube will
+be pushed in or out as the temperature varies,
+and is much more sensitive than ordinary thermometers;
+but barometric pressure affects it
+and renders it unfit for common use, but its indications
+are proportionate to the absolute scale;
+that is, the volume of the air at the melting-point
+of water will be increased or diminished~$\dfrac{1}{273}$
+by every change of one degree in cooling or heating,
+or~$\smash[t]{dfrac{1}{490}}$ if the degree be Fahrenheit.
+
+
+\Section{MECHANICAL EQUIVALENT.}
+\index{Heat, mechanical equivalent}%
+
+For a long time it was supposed that heat was a kind
+of substance that ordinary matter could absorb and
+emit. It was sometimes called caloric; and that word is
+in common use to-day, but not in the sense it originally
+had. Sometimes it was spoken of as one of the imponderables---a
+substance without weight. Now there is
+only one imponderable recognized, that is the ether. Sir
+Humphry Davy and Count Rumford found they could
+produce an indefinite amount of heat by the friction of
+one body upon another; and that implied if heat was a
+substance of any sort, that any piece of matter contained
+an infinite amount of heat, else one could get
+\DPPageSep{122.png}{110}%
+out of a body what was not in it. These two men concluded
+that heat was a kind of molecular motion, and
+that what their experiments showed was that friction
+only transformed the mechanical motion into molecular
+motion, which was called heat.
+
+The old conceptions had got so thoroughly incorporated
+into both the thoughts and the writings of others,
+that they could not easily be dislodged, and men went
+on as they had done. It was easier to do that than to
+change notions and terms that were familiar for others
+that were strange, even if true. A whole generation of
+men had to be buried before any attention was paid to
+what had been proved in the early part of the century.
+Soon after 1840 it occurred to a number of persons in
+different countries that if heat were but transformed
+mechanical motion there should be some quantitative
+relationship between them that might be discovered;
+that is, a given amount of mechanical motion ought to
+produce a definite amount of heat, and \textit{vice versa}.
+This was worked out in the most complete and satisfactory
+way by Joule of England. His method consisted
+\index{Joule}%
+in churning a definite amount of water and observing
+the rise in temperature in it. The churn paddle was
+driven by a known weight falling a known distance, and
+therefore the work done in driving the paddles was
+known in foot-pounds. In this way he found that $772$~pounds
+falling one foot would heat a pound of water
+one degree, and he called this number the mechanical
+equivalent of heat. In like manner it is said that when
+a pound of water loses one degree in temperature, it has
+lost energy enough to raise $772$~pounds one foot high.
+\DPPageSep{123.png}{111}%
+This relationship renders it easy to determine the
+amount of work a given amount of heat can do, and
+also the temperature that will be acquired by a given
+amount of water when a definite amount of work is
+done upon it. But the scientific importance of this
+new step is much greater than its practical utility.
+Before that time men had thought there were such
+things as \emph{forces}, independent of each other; and such an
+idea as mutual convertibility had not dawned upon any
+philosophic mind. Physical philosophers were so much
+misled by their terminology and the accompanying
+notions, that Joule's work, though demonstrative, made
+no impression upon them for several years, and it was
+refused a place in the transactions of their society for
+seven years. The reason for this common hostility to
+new knowledge is probably not far to seek. When one
+has achieved distinction in his line of work, especially
+in physical science, he is likely to possess his own philosophy
+of things, in which not a small part of the data
+is symbolic and is represented in mind only by a name;
+and if this chances to suggest something mysterious, as,
+for instance, an imponderable, the less is one likely to
+attempt, or suffer others to attempt, to displace it by
+definite mechanical conceptions. To change one's
+fundamental conceptions necessitates a change in his
+philosophy throughout,---a change that is not only difficult,
+but highly \DPtypo{distaseful}{distasteful}; and one ought not to expect
+a welcome to a man whose work necessitates such a
+change.
+
+Within the present century the advance in all directions
+has been such as to give definite mechanical
+\DPPageSep{124.png}{112}%
+\index{Thermodynamics}%
+conceptions and relations where before only ghosts and
+genii were supposed to do duty; and what can a man do
+when his genii have been slain and he must now depend
+upon~$mv^2$? To become acquainted with his new associate
+is generally the last thing he sets himself about.
+It was with Joule as it was with all the prophets and
+discoverers. Joule, however, was young, and he lived
+to attend the funeral of all his detractors.
+
+That heat and work are mutually convertible is now
+called the first law of thermo-dynamics; and it has led
+directly to a knowledge of the working-power there is
+in fuels, and made the duty of steam-engines and other
+sources of power beautifully simple.
+
+The amount of heat needed to raise the temperature
+of a pound of water one degree Fahrenheit is called a
+\emph{heat unit}. The amount of heat needed to raise the
+\index{Heat unit}%
+temperature of a kilogram of water one centigrade
+degree is sometimes called a calorie, and this is a
+unit in common use. It is found by careful experiment
+that a pound of coal when burnt gives up $14500$
+\emph{heat units}, or would raise the temperature of $100$~pounds
+of water~$145°$, or to any other equivalent. A
+pound of hydrogen, in like manner, burning with oxygen,
+will give $61000$ units, a pound of wood about
+$7000$, and so on. Each different substance has its own
+equivalent of such heat units. As each unit will do
+$772$ foot-pounds of work, a pound of coal, when burnt,
+will give $14500 × 772 = 11,194000$ foot-pounds of
+work, and so on for any other. This equivalency is
+independent of time or place. Whether the coal burns
+fast or slow makes no difference. When wood is
+\DPPageSep{125.png}{113}%
+burned in the fire it develops its work-power fast; but
+when it slowly rots it is undergoing the same process,
+oxidation, and the same amount of heat is developed,
+though at no time does the temperature appear to be
+above that of surrounding things. The food we eat possesses
+its mechanical equivalent, which is the maximum
+amount of work it would enable one to do. If bread
+and butter were used for the fuel of an engine, it would
+develop about $21000$ heat units (or calories) per pound,
+and this is equal to $772 × 21000 = 16,212000$ foot-pounds,
+and it has the same value when used for food;
+and thus one may know approximately the amount of
+energy he is supplied with from day to day; also, he
+may compare the amount of work he does, in lifting,
+walking, or otherwise, in a day with the food equivalent
+absorbed. Some of this is, of course, used to
+maintain the temperature of the body, the circulation
+of the blood, and so on---conditions that are tolerably
+constant.
+
+
+\Section{THE STEAM-ENGINE.}
+\index{Steam-engine}%
+
+The steam-engine is a machine for utilizing the
+heating-power of fuels, and, when complete, consists of
+furnace, boiler, and engine. The furnace transforms
+the energy of the fuel and air into heat units in the
+boiler, and the engine transforms this into the work of
+whatever sort it may be applied to.
+
+Evidently the efficiency of such an engine must depend
+upon how large a proportion of the heat units it
+utilizes compared with the heat units supplied to it.
+Steam-engines permit the steam to escape into the air
+\DPPageSep{126.png}{114}%
+\index{Steam-engine, efficiency of}%
+generally with a temperature higher than boiling water,
+and that means a great waste of unused heat; for the
+steam in the engine loses temperature proportionate to
+the work done by it, and, as stated before, the steam
+pressure is proportionate to its absolute temperature,
+not its temperature as indicated by common thermometers.
+And the absolute temperature on Fahrenheit scale
+will \DPtypo{he}{be} found by adding~$460$ to the indicated temperature.
+Suppose, then, an engine-boiler delivered steam
+to the engine at $248° \text{ Fah.} = 708 \text{ absolute}$, and on exit
+from the cylinder it was $212° \text{ Fah.} = 672 \text{ absolute}$, then
+the proportionate amount of work done compared with
+the whole supplied would be $\dfrac{708 - 672}{708} = \dfrac{36}{708}$, or only
+about five per cent of the heating-power of the fuel.
+Higher efficiency must be looked for chiefly by using
+steam at higher temperature and, therefore, higher pressure,
+which would increase the value of the numerator.
+
+The efficiency of engines is generally given in the
+amount of coal required to maintain one horse-power
+per hour. A horse-power for an hour is equal to
+$33000 × 60 = 1,980000$ foot-pounds; and the coal required
+varies from about two pounds in the best engines
+to six or eight pounds, locomotive engines generally
+being less efficient. As one pound of coal when burnt
+has an equivalent of $11,194000$ foot-pounds of work,
+two pounds will give $22,398000$ foot-pounds. When
+that maintains a horse-power for an hour, or $1,980000$
+foot-pounds, the efficiency is $\dfrac{1,980000}{22,398000} = 8 \text{ per cent}$.
+This appears very low; but it is to be remembered that
+\DPPageSep{127.png}{115}%
+\index{Heat, nature of}%
+the coal is seldom anywhere near pure; that much heat
+escapes by the flues without heating the water; that
+much is lost by heating the engine, boiler, and the
+pipes, etc., that does no good, and most of that that does
+go through the engine escapes to the air without having
+done any work; and it cannot be helped, for steam condenses
+to water at~\DPtypo{$212$,°}{$212°$,} and is no longer able to do
+steam service. In reality, such an efficiency is relatively
+high.
+
+
+\Section{AS TO THE NATURE OF HEAT.}
+
+It has been pointed out that it was concluded early
+in the century that heat must be some kind of motion,
+because its production depended solely upon antecedent
+motion, and that later the quantitative relationship
+between the two was accurately defined. The
+\emph{nature} of heat was ascertained, but the particular kind
+of motion that gave it its characteristics was not made
+out; that is, whether the motion was one of free path
+of the molecules,---a swinging to and fro in space,---or
+a true vibratory motion, such as a change of form of
+the molecules and atoms that made up the heated body,
+or a rotation of them, or a combination of any or all of
+these, was unknown. At first the conjecture prevailed
+that it was an oscillatory motion of the molecules
+among themselves even in a solid body; but after the
+discovery of spectrum analysis it became apparent that
+the atoms and molecules were in a state of true vibration,
+and their temperature depended upon the amplitude
+of that vibration. If one will remember that the
+atoms of matter are certainly elastic, and are not solid,
+\DPPageSep{128.png}{116}%
+\index{Hydrogen vibrations}%
+\index{Vibrations, gaseous}%
+and will also picture to himself what mechanically
+must happen when such a body is struck in any manner,
+that it \emph{must} vibrate, for the same reason that any
+visible elastic body must vibrate if struck, he will see
+quite clearly the condition of things among elastic
+atoms that collide with each other so many times per
+second.
+
+That they do thus vibrate is proved by the spectrum
+of substances in the gaseous state where between impacts
+they have time to vibrate a great number of
+times per second. At ordinary temperatures and density
+a gaseous molecule of hydrogen, having a mean free
+path of about the two-hundred-and-fifty-thousandth of
+an inch, and moving at the rate of $6000$~feet per
+second, will collide with its neighbors $17750$ millions
+of times per second, but its spectrum shows that it
+makes $450$~millions of millions of vibrations in the same
+interval, so that in each interval between impacts it
+would be able to make $\dfrac{450,000000,000000}{17750,000000} = 25352$,
+more than twenty-five thousand vibrations.
+
+Now, imagine a number of bells suspended by cords
+of equal length from the ceiling, but not so near as to
+touch each other. Suppose each bell to have the same
+musical pitch as every other one, and now let one of
+the outer ones be pulled away from the rest and forcibly
+swung back among them; presently every bell
+among them would be set swinging by the impact of
+others upon it, and each impact would cause each bell
+to sound its own particular pitch, and the elasticity of
+each individual one would maintain that vibration in
+\DPPageSep{129.png}{117}%
+some degree until the next impact, when it would be
+strengthened, and one would hear along with the
+bumping of the bells the sound due to the pitch of
+the individual bells. Something very like this goes on
+among the molecules of the gas. Their vibratory
+movements we cannot hear, but with the spectroscope
+they are detected and measured. Now, hot bodies cool
+by radiation---the giving-off of just such waves in the
+ether as we are describing,---and the fact that such cooling
+molecules of a gas give out constant wave-lengths,
+as is shown by their spectrum lines, is proof that the
+vibrations that originate the waves
+are not %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.25in}
+\Graphic{1.25in}{129a}
+\Caption{7}{Diag.\ 7.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+free-path or oscillatory motions,
+but true atomic ones, due to a
+\emph{change in form}. How this can be is
+easily seen by considering the change
+in form made by any vibrating body,
+say, a ring. Let the heavy lined ring
+represent an elastic atom: if it be subjected to impact it
+will assume an elliptical outline, and go through a series
+of phases represented by the dotted lines. This change
+of form, and uniform vibration, is a mechanical necessity,
+and is independent of the size or particular form a
+body may have. It is this kind of motion that embodies
+the energy represented by the temperature of
+an atom or a molecule, and the temperature varies with
+the square of the amplitude of this motion; and two
+bodies have the same temperature when their molecules
+have the same vibratory energy. A single molecule in
+free space would radiate all its heat away, and thus be
+reduced to absolute zero, if it were not continually
+\DPPageSep{130.png}{118}%
+\index{Heat, nature of}%
+receiving from other bodies an amount that depended
+upon its nearness to them and their own amplitude of
+similar motion. Hence the temperature of a body
+depends upon the amplitude of vibration of its molecules,
+and not upon any translatory or oscillatory or
+rotatory motions. This is not saying that molecules
+that are heated do not have other motions than the
+vibratory ones constituting their temperature, but
+when they do have others it is at the expense of the
+vibratory, and therefore has reduced the temperature;
+and such free-path motion as all gases have, and which
+produces pressure upon the walls of vessels, is maintained
+by the vibratory. It is not heat, but the result
+of heat, in the same way as the translatory motion of
+a bullet is not heat, but the result of heat. Most books
+on heat do not make the distinction here made, but
+combine the heat-motion of the molecules themselves
+with the translatory motion they have, calling the sum
+of them the heat of the gas. So long as one is concerned
+only with the energy involved in the actions it
+will make no difference; but if one analyzes the process
+for the factors it is plain that there are two distinct
+kinds of motion---one of them capable of setting
+up waves in the ether, the other not, for it is not known
+that any free-path or translatory movement of a body
+ever disturbs the ether; and if distinctions of such
+marked characters as these exist, and one of them involves
+temperature and ether waves, and the other
+does not, they ought not both to be called by the same
+name. The peculiar character of the energy involved
+in heat as distinguished from so-called mechanical
+\DPPageSep{131.png}{119}%
+\index{Heat of the sun, origin of}%
+energy, is that the factor of motion is of the vibratory
+sort, whereas the other is more or less translatory,---one
+capable of easy transformation into ether waves,
+the other incapable of such transformation, but each
+of them easily transformed into the other by impact.
+Equivalent velocities give the same amount of working
+ability, or $\dfrac{W v^2}{2g} = \dfrac{W a^2 n^2}{2g} = P d$ (see \Pageref{p.}{69}). So it
+can be understood how ordinary visible motion can be
+transformed into heat, and \textit{vice versa}, as easily as one
+can understand how the motion of the clapper of a bell
+is transformed into sound.
+
+
+\Section{ORIGIN OF THE SUN'S HEAT.}
+
+There has been much speculation as to the source of
+the heat of the sun. Unless one assumes that it has
+some miraculous or non-physical origin he is bound to
+account for it, if at all, upon the assumption that physical
+conditions and relations, such as we find at the
+earth, hold good at the sun as elsewhere.
+
+At the beginning of this chapter the various sources
+of heat were considered,---the mechanical, the chemical,
+the electric, and the radiative. If these be tested as
+to their sufficiency to account for the temperature of the
+sun, one may reach a conclusion as to the probability
+of any or all of them being concerned in it and their
+relative importance.
+
+It will be convenient to consider them in the reverse
+order, and first as to radiations. In order that a body
+should become heated by radiations, there must first be
+some body or bodies having as high or higher temperature
+\DPPageSep{132.png}{120}%
+to give rise to the radiations; and in this case, if
+the sun's heat came from such a source, one would need
+to look for the other bodies in the universe having such
+high temperature. The millions of stars shining by
+their own light would at first seem to furnish the proper
+source; for the testimony of the spectroscope is that
+they all are highly heated, and some astronomers think
+some of them to be much hotter than the sun is. One
+of the conditions under which radiant energy is distributed
+in space is that its amount upon a given surface is
+inversely as the square of the distance from the source;
+and as every one of these bodies is at such an amazing
+distance away, it is only with the most delicate instruments
+that their radiant energy can be measured, and a
+given surface upon the earth would receive as much as
+the same surface upon the sun, and the earth would be
+heated from the same source as much as the sun would
+be. Practically it is found to be but a very small quantity,
+and hence radiation from other bodies cannot
+possibly account for the sun's heat.
+
+Second, as to electrical currents: it may be said at the
+outset we have no direct knowledge that there are such
+at the sun, and from other knowledge we have of its
+constitution it would appear to be highly improbable
+that there were or could be electric currents there.
+Electric currents imply some generator and some conductor
+for their transference; and from what is known
+or may fairly be inferred that every substance we are
+acquainted with as a conductor of electricity which is
+present in the sun---and there are a good many of
+them---iron being particularly abundant, yet they are
+\DPPageSep{133.png}{121}%
+all at such a high temperature as to be a far reach from
+the conductibility we know anything about. There
+may be, but it is by no means certain, something solid
+in the sun, but the most of it is as gaseous as a bubble,
+and gases do not conduct currents of electricity.
+
+Third, chemical action is known to be the antecedent
+of vast quantities of heat. It may be recalled that a
+pound of hydrogen, for instance, when allowed to combine
+chemically with oxygen will give out $61000$ heat
+units. The atmosphere of the sun appears to be made
+up of elements mostly in an uncombined form, except
+in the cooler, outlying parts; that is, the temperature is
+so high that chemical combination is impossible except
+in exposed places where radiation can allow cooling to
+take place. It is tolerably certain that chemical combinations
+are taking place there whenever it is possible,
+and with such combination heat must be produced, if
+physical laws are in operation there as they are at the
+earth, but the amount of it going on, or possible, if the
+whole body of the sun were to combine its elements in
+this way, does not appear to begin to be equal to the
+expenditure of heat actually taking place.
+
+There remains only the mechanical sources of impact,
+friction, and condensation. There is good evidence
+that there is a large body of meteors in the neighborhood
+of the sun that must be falling upon its surface.
+The sun's attraction can give a velocity of nearly four
+hundred miles a second to any body reaching him from
+distant space, and such a velocity would, on impact,
+produce heat enough to reduce the whole body to a
+gaseous state almost instantly.
+\DPPageSep{134.png}{122}%
+\index{Sun, its magnitude}%
+\index{Sun, its heat}%
+\index{Sun, its age}%
+
+Given the mass and velocity of a body, and one may
+calculate how much energy it has, and how much heat
+is the equivalent of the mechanical energy. Such a
+computation shows that even if the earth were to fall
+into the sun, it would be volatilized in a very brief time.
+If the sun's surface were solid the impact would be
+sufficient to effect it almost instantly. If the shell of the
+sun were liquid it would be changed more slowly through
+friction, but, in the end, the result would be the same.
+It does not appear, however, that there is sufficient
+material that finds its way to the sun to furnish but a
+small proportion of the sun's heat, so neither impact
+nor friction can be admitted as sufficient agencies.
+There remains but one more, namely, compression. Is
+there any evidence that condensation is taking place?
+The body of the sun is $866000$ miles in diameter, and
+is so far away that this immense magnitude occupies
+but about half a degree of arc. If it were to shrink at
+the rate of a mile in twenty years, it would account for
+the present rate of expenditure, but such a shrinkage
+could not be observed from the earth for several thousand
+years, for nothing much less than a second of arc
+can be observed with certainty, and a second of arc at
+the sun's distance is equal to about $465$~miles, so it would
+require $465 × 20 = 9300$ years to produce an observable
+effect.
+
+Now, if the nebula theory be true, the sun once occupied
+all the space between itself and the outer boundary
+of the solar system and has shrunk to its present dimensions,
+a process which, if heat alone were concerned,
+would require about eighteen millions of years. It is
+\DPPageSep{135.png}{123}%
+\index{Heat, effects}%
+not probable that heat alone has been concerned, so
+it is probable that the sun is older than that, but the
+shrinkage will account for the heat, and it appears as
+the only probable conjecture. It will be understood
+that the gravitative action is the occasion of the compression,
+and that the approach is constant and as fast
+as the generated heat can be radiated away. It has
+been calculated that at the above rate of condensation
+it may be reduced to one-half its present diameter with
+its present radiation rate, in about five million years,
+when its density will be about twice that of water.
+
+From such considerations it appears in a high degree
+probable that the heat of the sun is due to condensation,
+the condensation is due to gravitation, and thus
+one is led back to a time when the substance of the
+sun and all the planets was scattered through that
+immense space, the diameter of which is not less than
+six thousand millions of miles. How matter came to
+be thus scattered is at present an enigma. It is important
+to remark here, though, that until there was impact
+among atoms, and molecules were formed, there evidently
+could be no such condition as what we call heat, and
+until these atoms and molecules vibrated there could
+be no light, that is, ether waves.
+
+
+\Section{EFFECTS OF HEAT.}
+
+Once in possession of a good, mechanical conception
+of the action going on in a heated body, one can proceed
+to trace out the various effects of heat in all
+directions. Thus to take the familiar one of pressure
+in a gas. A gas is simply a large number of individual
+\DPPageSep{136.png}{124}%
+\index{Molecules, number of, in universe}%
+molecules moving about with great velocity and bumping
+against each other and the sides of the containing
+vessel. Each molecule, though small, has some momentum;
+but the enormous number of them in, say, a cubic
+inch, five hundred millions of millions of millions, and
+their relatively high translatory velocities,---say fifteen
+hundred feet per second, gives them momentum which,
+when spent upon the side of the vessel, gives a pressure
+equal to about fifteen pounds per square inch. If one
+were to hold up a shield against which many balls were
+thrown per second, he would need to brace himself to
+withstand the pressure that would appear to be constant.
+
+If the gas be heated the molecules have increased
+amplitude of vibration, and they rebound from each
+other with greater velocity, and strike the side with
+more momentum, and hence the pressure is greater.
+As the pressure is proportional to the absolute temperature,
+it is plain there could be no pressure if there
+was no vibratory motion. If the density of the gas
+be increased by adding more molecules per cubic inch,
+there must a greater number of them strike upon the
+sides of the vessel in a second, which will increase the
+pressure, that is, the pressure varies as the density.
+
+When it is said that gases have a tendency to expand,
+or that they exhibit a repulsive action, all that is signified
+is this; as elastic bodies, the molecules rebound
+after impact, and continue on in their direction, according
+to the first law of motion, until otherwise obstructed.
+When a ball rebounds from the side of the house it
+has been thrown against, it is not because there is any
+repulsion between the ball and the house.
+\DPPageSep{137.png}{125}%
+\index{Boiling-point pressure}%
+
+
+\Section{EFFECT OF PRESSURE UPON BOILING AND FUSION.}
+
+When it is said that the boiling-point of water is~$212°$,
+it is to be understood that the pressure of the air
+upon the surface of the water is fifteen pounds per
+square inch. At elevated places water boils at a much
+lower temperature; and when in a tight vessel, like the
+boilers of steam-engines, the pressure of the steam
+affects its boiling-point in the opposite way, raising it.
+Thus at twenty pounds steam pressure, the temperature
+required to boil water is~$228°$, at sixty pounds it is~$291°$,
+at ninety pounds~$319°$, and at the high pressures
+employed in locomotives of one hundred and fifty pounds
+or more to the square inch, the temperature of the
+steam and water is $360°$~or more. As one goes down
+into a mine the pressure of the air becomes greater,
+and higher temperature is needed to boil water. The
+explanation of this phenomenon is that the heated molecules
+of the liquid are bumping against each other in
+all directions, but the surface molecules can receive
+such bumps only from below and on their sides. If
+there were no molecules above to beat downwards, the
+surface molecules would fly rapidly up into the free
+space, which would be what we call a vacuum. This
+escape of the surface molecules of a liquid into the
+space above is called evaporation, and the higher the
+temperature of the liquid the harder the bumps, and
+the more will be flipped away from the liquid and
+become free rovers, having a long, free path. When,
+however, the gaseous particles are numerous and strike
+back upon the surface, that is, when there is a gaseous
+\DPPageSep{138.png}{126}%
+\index{Earth, solidity of}%
+pressure upon the surface, the surface molecules are
+prevented from rising, that is to say, evaporation cannot
+go on so fast, boiling is prevented until more energy is
+given to the water, and that means a higher temperature.
+
+The melting-point of substances is likewise affected
+by the pressure to which they are subject, and increasing
+the pressure increases the temperature needed to
+fuse them. Such small variations of pressure as only
+a few pounds per square inch do not make much difference,
+but pressure measured by tons per square inch
+makes a great deal. The condition of the interior of
+the earth appears to depend upon this as a most important
+factor. As one goes beneath the surface of the
+earth in mines and tunnels, it is observed that the temperature
+rises about one degree for every fifty or sixty feet
+of descent; and it was formerly inferred from this that at
+the depth of a few miles a temperature would be reached
+high enough to melt the most refractory bodies, and hence
+the interior of the earth was probably in a fused state
+while the crust was relatively thin. Such a view took
+no account of the effect of pressure upon the state of
+bodies. At the depth of a mile of water the pressure
+must be equal to $62.5×5280=330000$ pounds per
+square foot, and as rock is $2\frac{1}{2}$~times\DPnote{** PP: Slant fraction in original} the weight of
+water, the pressure must be $825000$ pounds, or over
+four hundred tons; and at five, ten, or a hundred miles,
+it is obvious the pressure is correspondingly greater.
+A body that at the surface of the earth would melt at any
+assignable temperature would require a much higher
+temperature to fuse when subjected to such enormous
+\DPPageSep{139.png}{127}%
+\index{Temperature, maximum}%
+pressure. It appears that the pressure increases faster
+than the observed temperature; and hence the earth
+must be solid to the centre, instead of being liquid as
+formerly supposed. This makes it appear that the
+phenomena of volcanoes are only local, and do not indicate
+\index{Volcanoes}%
+any general melted condition of the earth. If a
+body that would melt at a thousand degrees on the surface
+of the earth be subject to such pressure that it is
+not melted when its temperature is two thousand
+degrees, then, if the pressure be suddenly removed
+from it, the heat it has will instantly liquefy it. This
+may be the condition at the base of volcanoes, where
+shrinkage of the earth's crust in some direction may
+relieve the pressure in some other direction; and a
+large mass of heated material may become liquid, expanding
+in volume, and overflow in any direction where
+there is a vent, and this would be called a volcanic
+eruption.
+
+\Section{MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE.}
+
+We have considered the condition called absolute
+zero, wherein the molecules have no vibratory motion
+whatever; and it has also been pointed out, and it is
+generally agreed, that the temperature of a body varies
+as the square of its amplitude of molecular vibration.
+
+It has often been assumed in treating of high temperatures,
+such as that of the sun for instance, that
+there is no limit to the temperature to which matter
+can be raised. So some have estimated the temperature
+of the sun to be several millions of degrees; but
+a consideration of the factors involved will show such a
+\DPPageSep{140.png}{128}%
+conclusion to be impossible, for the dimensions and
+form of a body set a limit to the amplitude it can have.
+A tuning-fork cannot have its prongs vibrate beyond
+the limit where its prongs touch each other, and a
+vibrating ring cannot have an amplitude greater than
+one-fourth its circumference; and this degree is only
+possible to a mathematical circle having no thickness.
+Make a ring of a piece of twine, and elongate any
+diameter until the opposite sides touch, then move the
+middle points through a similar distance, and it will be
+seen that the limit will be equal to a quadrant of the
+circle; but if the ring be a thick one, say made of rope,
+it would be less than that, and how much less will
+depend upon the relative thickness of the rope to the
+diameter of the ring. If the thickness of the rope
+were one-fourth the diameter of the ring, then the
+amplitude could be but one-half the quadrant, and so
+on. Now, the atoms of matter have a definite size, and
+no one has ventured to suggest that they were variable
+in size in any degree; and one may, therefore, compute
+the greatest amplitude such a body could have, whether
+it were a circle or a hollow sphere without thickness.
+If the diameter be as before stated, one fifty-millionth
+of an inch, calculation shows that the greatest amplitude
+it could have would be about one sixty-four-millionth
+of an inch. This, multiplied by the number of
+vibrations it makes per second, will give the equivalent
+velocity from which its energy can be calculated. On
+\Pageref{page}{67}, it is shown that the velocity of a vibrating
+atom, if the amplitude be one-half of the diameter,
+will be about eighty miles a second. If the amplitude
+\DPPageSep{141.png}{129}%
+be equal in measure to the quadrant, as is here supposed,
+this velocity would be not far from a hundred
+miles per second, and the energy represented by that
+velocity would be the utmost energy of heat, or highest
+temperature that the body could have. The pressure
+of gases enables one to determine the velocity of
+the particles; and when this is known at a given temperature,
+the temperature at any other velocity may be
+computed.
+
+The statement that atoms and molecules can have a
+maximum temperature must not be understood to imply
+that the energy they can have is fixed at that limit,
+because aside from their temperature energy, represented
+by their vibratory motion, they can have any
+assignable translatory velocity in addition. But it does
+imply that ether waves, arising from temperature,
+have a fixed limit for each element; and such radiant
+energy from a given source cannot be transmitted beyond
+a certain rate, because its amplitude has a limit,
+so that whatever actual energy the sun as a whole may
+have, it cannot lose that energy by radiation faster than
+an assignable rate.
+
+This has an important bearing upon the question of
+the age of the sun. Computations have been made of
+the length of time the sun can have been giving out
+its energy, on the assumption that the sun is a cooling
+body, and that it was formerly much hotter than it is
+now. If the above statements are correct, the probability
+is that the sun is as hot now as it ever was, and
+that its rate of loss of heat by radiation has not been
+greatly different from what it is to-day; so, instead of
+\DPPageSep{142.png}{130}%
+being only fifteen or twenty millions of years old, it
+may be very much more.
+
+As the temperature of a body represents its molecular
+energy, and is measured by $\dfrac{mv^2}{2}$, it follows that if two
+different kinds of molecules, such as hydrogen and
+oxygen, have the same temperature, they will have the
+same amount of energy; but the mass of an oxygen
+molecule is sixteen times greater than the mass of a
+hydrogen molecule. In an equal weight of the two
+there will be sixteen times more molecules of hydrogen
+than of oxygen, and therefore the hydrogen will have
+sixteen times the energy of the oxygen at the same
+temperature. To produce a rise of temperature of one
+degree in a pound, or any given weight of hydrogen,
+would require sixteen times as much heat as the same
+weight of oxygen would need. This difference in
+thermal capacity of different substances is called their
+specific heat. In general, the lighter the molecules
+\index{Specific heat}%
+that make up a substance, the more numerous must
+they be to make up a given mass, and the higher will
+be its specific heat; i.e., the more heat must be expended
+upon it to produce a given rise in its temperature.
+The specific heat of water is chosen as a standard
+and is unity, as it is found to require more heat to
+raise a given weight of it one degree than any other
+substance. One heat unit will raise the temperature
+of a pound of it one degree; all other substances
+require but a fraction of this. From what is said, it
+appears that the specific heat of an element varies
+inversely as its atomic weight. The specific heat of
+\DPPageSep{143.png}{131}%
+\index{Dissociations}%
+a substance determines the temperature it will attain
+when a definite quantity of heat is supplied to it. If
+a pound of hydrogen and eight pounds of oxygen are
+exploded together, and not allowed to expand in volume,
+$51444$ heat units calories are produced. The $51444$
+heat units would be divided among nine pounds of
+water vapor, that has a specific heat under such conditions
+of~$.37$. The temperature attained would be
+$\dfrac{51444}{9×.37}=15450°$. This temperature is much higher
+than the limit of possible combination of the two
+gases, which, at about~$3000°$, are unable to combine, so
+such an action could not take place any faster than the
+parts could cool down to the latter temperature. If
+the mixture be allowed to expand, the temperature of~$3000°$
+may not be reached, and the action of the whole
+is so rapid it is called an explosion.
+
+\Section{DISSOCIATION.}
+
+When compound molecules are broken up into their
+elementary constituents in any manner, the process is
+called dissociation. It may be effected by electrical
+action, as when water is decomposed by it, or by chemical
+action, as when wood is decomposed under water,
+setting the carbon free; but heat is competent to effect
+the same end. At the temperature of about~$3000°$ the
+existence of water is impossible, as the elements cannot
+stay united, and the reason is obvious. Whatever the
+nature of the attraction that holds atoms together in
+chemical compounds, if the elementary atoms are themselves
+in brisk vibratory motion, as we know they are,
+\DPPageSep{144.png}{132}%
+\index{Matter, effect of temperature upon}%
+they must be straining their bonds continually to separate;
+and when the amplitude of such motion reaches a
+certain maximum, the impacts are so violent as to make
+the atoms rebound out of each other's neighborhood,
+and thus prevent cohesion. The atoms then either
+enter into new combinations with others, if possible,
+and if not they remain as gaseous particles, and subject
+to the laws of gases.
+
+If one starts with a piece of ice and applies heat it
+melts, and we call the liquid water. Apply more heat
+and the water becomes steam, in which the individual
+molecules are no longer able to cohere, because of their
+energetic motions; but each molecule remains intact,
+having a long free path, for a cubic inch of water
+becomes nearly a cubic foot of steam under ordinary
+air pressure. If still more heat be applied, the molecules
+become more and more unstable until they too
+are broken up in the same way and for the same reason
+that the solid and the liquid forms were. When it is
+no longer possible for hydrogen and oxygen to combine,
+it is still possible for the atoms of each to combine
+with each other, hydrogen with hydrogen and oxygen
+with oxygen, forming elementary molecules \textit{H H}, and
+\textit{O O}; but if a still higher temperature be applied, even
+this combination becomes impossible, and the atoms
+themselves become free rovers and individually independent.
+Thus it is seen that the different states
+of matter depend altogether upon temperature. At
+absolute zero there can be no such thing as a gas, for
+the molecules would have no individual vibrations and
+therefore no free paths. They would probably fall to
+\DPPageSep{145.png}{133}%
+the bottom of the vessel and remain quiescent. It is
+also probable that both liquids and solids too would
+cease to exist, not that matter would be annihilated, but
+a solid, a liquid, and a gas are simply each a bundle of
+physical properties that depend mostly upon temperature,
+and those properties would probably disappear
+with the disappearance of the conditions upon which
+they depended.
+%\DPPageSep{146.png}{134}%
+
+
+\Chapter{VII}{Ether Waves}{134}
+
+\index{Ether waves}%
+\index{Ether wave qualities}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+
+It has already been stated in what has preceded this
+that translational motions of matter are not competent
+to originate ether waves, and that vibratory motions
+of both atoms and molecules can originate them. A
+consideration of the origin, transmission, and effects of
+such ether waves constitutes the subject-matter of what
+is called the science of light. The word ``light'' is
+commonly used to signify that agency in nature which
+is capable of affecting the eye and causes vision, or the
+sensation of sight, and until within a very few years
+has been supposed to be a peculiar kind of a wave
+motion in the ether quite distinct from other waves
+known to exist which were competent to produce heating
+and chemical effects, so such waves as were known
+from their effects were called heat waves, light waves,
+and actinic or chemical waves, according as they heated
+bodies, produced light, or brought about chemical reactions.
+These three sorts of waves were supposed to
+coexist generally, but were capable of being separated
+from each other so there could be a beam of either
+without the others. This is now known to be a mistaken
+view, for what a given ether wave will do depends
+upon what it falls on rather than on its own peculiarity.
+The same waves that fall upon the eye and produce the
+sensation of sight will heat other kinds of matter, and
+\DPPageSep{147.png}{135}%
+\index{Ether waves, their source}%
+\index{Light, a sensation}%
+if they fall upon a surface of molecules that are unstable,
+that is, in which the atoms that make up the molecules
+are not strongly cohesive, the molecules are
+disrupted by the waves, and the atoms enter into new
+combinations, and this process is called a chemical process;
+and while it is true that some waves will not produce
+vision, there are none that will not produce both
+heating and chemical effects, so there is no such distinction
+among ether waves as was supposed, and this
+leads to another conclusion also; viz., if there is no
+such distinction between waves, then there is no such
+thing as light at all, unless we classify all rays as light,
+whether they can produce sight or not, which is sometimes
+done to save explanations, but it leads to the
+anomaly that there is such a thing as dark light, which
+is absurd. There will be no difficulty whatever if light
+be defined as a sensation merely, and the waves competent
+to produce the sensation be called visual waves.
+Up to the present time, however, the old terminology
+is quite generally adhered to in spite of the difficulty of
+reconciling the old signification with the new knowledge.
+There is no single word that signifies ether
+waves in general, and independent of the effects that
+may be produced in specific cases, and for that reason
+this term has been adopted. The word ``light'' is
+entirely inadequate, and likely to mislead one not well
+versed in the phenomena.
+
+\Section{ORIGIN OF ETHER WAVES.}
+
+The source of ether waves of all degrees whatever
+is the vibratory motions of atoms and molecules as distinguished
+\DPPageSep{148.png}{136}%
+\index{Elements}%
+from their translatory, or free-path motions,
+but their rates of vibration are determined by their
+atomic weights. An atom of hydrogen, for instance,
+has a different rate from oxygen, for the same reason
+that two tuning-forks, though made precisely alike,
+would have different rates if one were made of steel
+and the other of aluminium. If they have different
+rates, then the number of waves produced by them per
+second will be different, and as all waves travel in the
+ether with the same speed, namely, $186000$ miles per
+second, the length of the waves produced by them
+must be different.
+
+There are about seventy different elementary atoms,
+each setting up its characteristic waves in the ether all
+the time. It is to be remembered that all atoms and
+molecules are always to be considered as hot bodies;
+that is, bodies having some temperature, and mostly
+a long way above absolute zero; and also that their
+energy of this kind may be spent upon the ether. If
+the waves from one molecule have more energy than
+those given off by a second molecule upon which they
+fall, the second one absorbs some of it so as to have its
+own temperature raised until it is the same as the other;
+that is, until the energy given off by them both is
+equal. And this is universally true. Matter is continually
+exchanging energy in this way, always tending to
+bring about equality of temperature. But the number
+of vibrations a body makes does not need to be the
+same as that of another body in order to possess the
+same amount of energy, for the energy depends upon
+both mass and velocity. If the mass be small, the
+\DPPageSep{149.png}{137}%
+velocity must be greater, and \emph{vice versa}. And thus it
+is that the seventy elements that make up the kinds of
+matter we know are everywhere and at all times setting
+up ether waves, each kind its particular rates, when not
+otherwise interfered with.
+
+There is, however, a qualification that must be added
+that has a high degree of scientific importance. Every
+elementary substance is vibrating at several rates at the
+same time, as do piano-strings, bells, and musical instruments
+in general. Every particular rate of vibration
+produces its own waves, and thus each atom and
+molecule is continually producing, when not interfered
+with, its own characteristic set of waves. This must
+make the ether waves from the different kinds of matter
+exceedingly complex, and disentangling them correspondingly
+difficult; yet it has been done.
+
+When we look at luminous bodies, like the sun or
+stars, or flames, or gas, they seem to differ from each
+\index{Flames}%
+other in brightness and sometimes in color, as is seen
+in fireworks. A flame of alcohol has a bluish tint, a
+little salt in it makes it yellow, some lithium makes it
+red, and copper, green or bluish, while sunlight is white,
+as is the electric light. If one looks through a common
+prism at the landscape the edges of objects appear in
+rainbow tints, and with the colors arranged in the same
+order, while at the same time the shape of things is
+more or less distorted. If a beam of sunlight be sent
+directly through such a prism, a patch of colors may be
+seen on the floor or wall, and this is called a solar
+spectrum; and if this light of different tints has its
+wave length measured, it appears that the red light has
+\DPPageSep{150.png}{138}%
+a wave length of about the one forty-thousandth of an
+inch, and the violet light at the other extreme a wave
+length of about the one sixty-thousandth of an inch,
+while the intermediate tints range regularly from the
+one to the other. There is in this spectrum that can
+be seen an almost infinite number of wave lengths;
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{150a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{8}{Diag.\ 8.---Visible Solar Spectrum.}
+ \index{Spectrum, solar}%
+\end{figure}
+there is no break among them apparently. The same
+thing holds true of a spectrum produced by letting the
+light from a lamp or candle go through the same prism:
+\index{Prism}%
+the tints, their order, and their wave lengths are found
+to be the same. The prism then receives ether waves
+of any or all wave lengths, and separates or disperses
+them in the order of their wave lengths. In doing this
+it deflects the longer waves less than it does the shorter
+ones. The deflection of the waves from their original
+course is called \emph{refraction}, and the separation from each
+\index{Refraction}%
+other so as to produce the spectrum is called \emph{dispersion}.
+\index{Dispersion}%
+A prism effects both at the same time, and thus enables
+one to isolate at will any particular tint or part of the
+spectrum; and if one takes a single narrow portion in
+any such spectrum, he has a bundle of light rays of
+uniform wave lengths, and he may then determine their
+value. In this way the wave lengths of the different
+colored parts of the spectrum of sunlight have been
+found to be as follows:---
+\DPPageSep{151.png}{139}%
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{ll<{\qquad\qquad}l}
+Red, & about & $39000$ to the inch
+\\
+Orange, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $41000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Yellow, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $44000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Green, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $47000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Blue, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $51000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Indigo, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $54000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+Violet, & \PadTo{\text{about}}{\Ditto} & $57000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+\multicolumn{2}{l}{Extreme visible, about} & $60000$ \PadTo{\text{to }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{the }}{\Ditto}\PadTo{\text{inch}}{\Ditto}
+\\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+A spectroscope is an instrument composed of a prism
+\index{Spectroscope}%
+mounted between two tubes, one of them having an
+adjustable slot for the light to be examined to pass
+through on its way to the prism, the other being a short
+telescope to magnify somewhat the image of the
+spectrum that %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{151a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{9}{Diag.\ 9.---Spectroscope.}
+\end{figure}
+it may the better be seen. With this,
+light from any source may be examined. Light made
+up of all wave lengths that can be seen shows as
+a complete spectrum, while any light made up of but
+a part of these gives a corresponding incomplete
+spectrum. The flame of an alcohol lamp, or a Bunsen
+\DPPageSep{152.png}{140}%
+\index{Spectrum analysis}%
+gas-flame, gives but little brightness and not much to
+produce a spectrum; but a little salt in the flame gives
+to it a bright yellow tint, and shows in the spectroscope
+a single narrow band of yellow light in the same place
+as the yellow seen in sunlight, and therefore having the
+same wave length. Such a beam made up of waves of
+one wave length is called homogeneous light. This
+sodium light has a wave length of about the one forty-four-thousandth
+of an inch. With other more refined
+methods, which cannot be described here, sodium is
+found to have other wave lengths beyond both the red
+and blue ends, and which cannot be detected by the
+eye alone. Hydrogen, another element, gives a bright
+red line and a blue line that are easily seen; and several
+others may be detected with more delicate apparatus.
+In this manner all the elements have been attentively
+studied during the past thirty years, and many treatises
+may be found that give full particulars of the processes
+and results. The substance of knowledge obtained by
+the study of the spectra of the elements may be briefly
+stated to be,---
+
+1st, Each element has its own vibratory rates at
+a given temperature, and sets up corresponding ether
+waves; some of these can be seen, and others require
+more complicated apparatus to discover.
+
+2d, In order that the characteristic vibrations of any
+atoms or molecules may take place, it is necessary that
+they be allowed a free path to vibrate in; in other words,
+they need be in the gaseous state. If they be crowded
+together, as they are in solids and liquids, they have no
+chance to vibrate without interference. A pailful of
+\DPPageSep{153.png}{141}%
+school-bells might make a jangling noise, but would give
+no particular pitch or characteristic sound of any of the
+bells, and only when not interfered with for a part of the
+time at least could one give out its true sound. This
+gaseous state is generally obtained by igniting in flames
+or by the electric spark the substance to be examined.
+In an electric arc all substances are volatilized, and may
+be then studied with the spectroscope to great advantage.
+Sometimes substances that remain in the gaseous
+state at ordinary temperatures, such as hydrogen, oxygen,
+chlorine, etc., are hermetically sealed in glass tubes,
+after rarefication, in order to obtain long free paths, and
+are lighted up by means of electric discharges through
+them.
+
+3d, On account of the lack of vibratory freedom, the
+molecules of solids and liquids give out vibrations of all
+wave lengths, for every partial and incompleted movement
+disturbs the ether; and there are all degrees of
+these, but the energy of the shorter ones is rarely great
+enough to affect the eye, and hence are not visible at
+ordinary temperatures. If a body like a cannon-ball be
+gradually heated in the dark, it will presently begin to
+glow with a dim red tint. If looked at through the
+spectroscope, only red light on the extreme red border
+can be seen. As the temperature rises, additional
+shorter waves appear, and the spectrum broadens to the
+orange, then the yellow, and so on; the ones already
+showing growing brighter meanwhile, until the ball is
+in a bright glow, and a full continuous spectrum is produced.
+As the ball cools, the reverse holds true; and
+the violet waves are the first to disappear, then the blue,
+\DPPageSep{154.png}{142}%
+and lastly the red vanishes from sight. Still the ball is
+much too hot to safely touch, and continues to cool by
+giving off ether waves differing from the rest only in
+being too long to affect the eye. They still are refracted
+by the prism, and an invisible spectrum is produced,
+and this spectrum has been traced out to ten
+times the length of the visible spectrum.
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{154a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{10}{Diag.\ 10.---Complete Solar Spectrum.}
+\end{figure}
+
+The sun, an electric arc, and other solid hot bodies,
+\index{Spectrum, solar}%
+give out similar long, invisible spectra.
+
+In like manner, where the body is white-hot, and giving
+out the shortest waves the eye can see, there can still
+be found, a long way beyond that limit, waves that can
+do photographic work, which is but a kind of molecular
+dissociation.
+
+4th, Where waves of a given length are made to pass
+through a gas having similar vibratory rates, or capable
+of producing waves of the same length, the molecules
+of the latter will absorb such waves, and therefore stop
+their progress, especially if they have more energy than
+the waves the absorbing gas can give out. So if sunlight
+containing the same yellow light as that of sodium
+gas be made to pass through the latter, it will be stopped;
+and if this be done where there is a spectrum of sunlight,
+the yellow will be cut out from it, and there will be
+but a black line instead. This is called gaseous absorption,
+\index{Gaseous absorption}%
+and is an illustration of what was said a little way
+\DPPageSep{155.png}{143}%
+\index{Sun, its structure}%
+back about the exchange of energy always going on.
+The absorbing power of a gas has a significance like its
+radiations, and indicates its presence as well.
+
+The yellow light of sodium gas has a definite place
+in the spectrum; and hence if one perceives those wave
+lengths in a gaseous spectrum, he knows that sodium
+must be present in a state of incandescence, giving rise
+to the waves. But if the light from a white-hot cannon-ball
+were to be sent through that same vapor, and afterwards
+examined with a prism, the yellow light would be
+absent, and the absence would still proclaim the existence
+of sodium vapor.
+
+Hence, if an incandescent body gives a continuous
+spectrum, it must be a solid or a liquid; the molecules
+must be so compact that the individual vibrations are
+prevented, and only irregular ones can be made. If a
+discontinuous but bright line spectrum is shown, the
+matter must be in a gaseous state, and the molecules
+have free path.
+
+If a bright spectrum have black spaces or bands
+across it, there is indicated a solid or liquid incandescent
+body shining through gas that acts by absorption
+upon it, and thus both the solid and gaseous conditions
+are detected, as well as the nature of the substance in
+the gaseous state.
+
+This knowledge has been applied to the discovery of
+the substance and condition of the sun and other celestial
+bodies, and it is concluded that the sun has a solid
+or liquid surface as a shell to a gaseous interior, and
+that the atmosphere of it consists of the various
+elements that make up the body of the sun in so highly
+\DPPageSep{156.png}{144}%
+\index{Jupiter, temperature of}%
+\index{Mars, atmosphere of}%
+\index{Saturn, temperature of}%
+heated a condition as to keep them in a vaporous or
+gaseous state. The characteristic spectroscopic lines of
+about forty elements have been found there. Some of
+the elements have a very large number of spectroscopic
+lines. Iron, for instance, has several hundred lines.
+Hydrogen is particularly abundant. Perhaps the most
+important discovery due to the spectroscope has been
+this: that there are a very large number of gaseous
+bodies, called nebulæ, in the heavens; some of these fill
+immense spaces; they are in a condensing state, and
+all of them are mostly made up of hydrogen. This
+discovery gave an additional probability to the nebula
+theory of the origin of the solar system, for it showed
+that process in its various stages in more distant
+parts of space: and in addition to that, it has led to
+the surmise that in some way some of those we now
+call elements are really compounds of more elementary
+substances, probably hydrogen; but that is a speculation
+merely, for there is no other than such spectroscopic
+evidence that anything like transmutation of what we
+call elements into others can take place.
+
+The spectroscopic examination of the other members
+of the solar system has shown that Mars has an
+atmosphere like ours, holding watery vapor in it;
+that Jupiter is red-hot; that the temperature of Saturn
+is probably much too high for any such living things
+as exist on this earth---and in this way has answered
+the question so interesting to most thoughtful persons
+as to whether the planets are inhabited or not. Jupiter
+certainly cannot be inhabited by any such beings as we
+are, for the temperature would destroy all organic things.
+\DPPageSep{157.png}{145}%
+\index{Motion, kinds of}%
+\index{Stars, their motions}%
+
+Velocities of translation can also be measured when
+as high as two miles a second or more, by the displacement
+of spectroscopic lines towards one or the other
+end of the spectrum. If a star is approaching us, the
+wave lengths are shortened a small quantity, and that
+changes the position of a line towards the blue end,
+while recession makes it longer and moves it towards
+the red end, so it has been found that Sirius is receding
+\index{Sirius}%
+at the rate of nineteen miles per second; that Arcturus
+\index{Arcturus}%
+is coming towards us at the rate of sixty miles
+per second. In like manner is shown that the sun, and
+with him the whole solar system, is travelling in the
+direction of the constellation Hercules at the probable
+rate of about sixteen miles per second.
+
+Now, all this presupposes that the principles established
+in the laboratory for substances there investigated
+are applicable wherever such matter exists;
+for instance, that the spectrum of sodium and of hydrogen
+and iron, which depends upon temperature and
+pressure, is as reliable if the light comes from a body
+a million miles or a thousand million miles away as if it
+came from only one mile or a foot distant. If it be
+thus widely applicable, then do we have the best of
+testimony that matter, its conditions, and its laws are
+the same everywhere, and that the earth is a fair specimen
+of the rest of the universe.
+
+
+\Section{OTHER PHENOMENA OF ETHER WAVES.}
+
+Whenever a line of ether waves---which is generally
+called a ray, whatever the wave length may be---falls
+\DPPageSep{158.png}{146}%
+upon matter, the ray may be either absorbed, transmitted,
+or reflected. Neither of these results takes
+place singly in any case. There is no known body, for
+instance, that can wholly absorb all the rays that fall
+upon it, nor wholly transmit or reflect them. If a body
+should be able to absorb all the rays that fall upon it,
+we should not be able to see it unless itself were a self-luminous
+body, for we only see other than self-luminous
+objects by means of the light reflected from them,
+and such a body would reflect no light, and hence could
+not be visible.
+
+Bodies which absorb most of the rays that fall upon
+them we call black and opaque; that is, a body that
+reflects but a small portion of the waves that are incident
+upon it is a dark or black body, because we see
+but little of it. If it reflected none at all, it would be
+quite invisible. In like manner, a perfectly transparent
+body would be one that would neither absorb nor
+reflect any rays, and for that reason would be quite as
+invisible as space itself. The air is perhaps as near an
+approach to perfect transparency as anything that can be
+\index{Transparency}%
+named; yet if it reflected no rays at all, there would be
+nothing of the diffused light that is now so plentiful on
+the clearest day, but there would be only what would
+come direct to us from the sun or other luminous body.
+We call clear glass and water transparent because objects
+can be plainly seen through them; and a sheet of hard
+black rubber we call opaque, for nothing whatever can
+be seen through it, nevertheless it has been shown
+that waves longer than those that affect the eye, go
+through such hard rubber as easily as the shorter ones
+\DPPageSep{159.png}{147}%
+we call light go through glass, hence transparency and
+opacity are terms only relative to particular kinds of
+waves. All kinds of matter reflect more or less of the
+waves that fall upon it. This reflection is merely the
+\index{Reflection}%
+change in direction of the ray; but it always follows a
+definite law, keeping to its original plane, and making
+the angle of reflection equal to the incident angle.
+The surfaces of most bodies are very rough, and the
+rays are reflected in all directions, because the points
+upon the surface face in so many ways. This will
+be obvious to one who looks at the surface of paper or
+of wood with a magnifying-glass. The smoother a surface
+is made, the nearer will all the incident rays take
+the same direction on reflection. Mirrors are thus
+\index{Mirrors}%
+made of smooth glass or metallic surfaces, and are
+plane, convex, or concave; but whether they are made
+with plane or curved surface, the rays reflected always
+follow the above law.
+
+
+\Section{REFRACTION.}
+\index{Refraction}%
+
+So long as ether waves fall perpendicularly upon any
+surface of any kind of matter, the rays go straight on
+into it if they be not reflected or absorbed at the surface;
+there is no change in the direction, but the velocity of
+transmission is less in all kinds of matter than it is in
+the ether. In glass it is only about two-thirds as fast,
+and in water about three-fourths. When the ray meets
+the surface at an angle, it is bent out of its course more
+or less, depending upon the kind of material it falls
+upon, and also the angle at which it meets it. This
+change of direction, when entering a new medium, is
+\DPPageSep{160.png}{148}%
+called refraction, and this property is possessed by all
+kinds of matter, solid as well as liquid and gas. The
+refraction for a given angle of incidence is more for a
+liquid than for a gas, more for a solid like glass than for
+water or other liquids, and more for a diamond than for
+any other known substance. The same rule that obtains
+when the waves enter a medium, holds when it leaves
+it; the direction it will now take will depend upon the
+angle the rays make with that surface and the character
+of the medium into which it enters. Thus, if a
+ray meets a piece of plain glass at an angle, say, of~$45°$,
+some of it will be reflected, making an angle of~$90°$
+with the incident ray, and some of it will be refracted
+into it, making an angle with the original direction, and
+continue on in a straight line until it meets the next
+surface, when it will again assume its original direction:
+but when the second surface is not parallel with the
+first, as is the case with the prism, the direction may
+depart still more from the original; and the shorter the
+wave length, the more the deflection. It is this property
+that is made use of in spectroscopes, microscopes,
+and telescopes. A lens has one or both surfaces
+curved, so as to be convex or concave, depending upon
+the use it is to be put to,---a convex glass converging
+the rays, and a concave one separating them,---and
+almost any degree of either of these may be obtained
+by proper curvature.
+
+Both microscopes and telescopes are so common, and
+descriptions of them are to be found in so many places,
+that they need not be described here. The inquiry is
+often made, why still more powerful microscopes and
+\DPPageSep{161.png}{149}%
+\index{Microscope, magnifying powers}%
+telescopes are not made so as to reveal the very smallest
+and the most distant thing. The utility of a
+microscope depends upon how plainly it is able to
+make minute objects visible; and the more a given one
+magnifies an object, the smaller the portion that can be
+seen and the less light is available for the purpose, and
+when the objects are so small as the few thousandths
+of an inch, the light waves interfere with each other at
+the edges, and produce colored fringes that cannot be
+got rid of altogether, and very small objects become
+indistinct for that reason. Microscope lenses are
+marked as $1$~inch, $\dfrac{1}{2}$~inch, $\dfrac{1}{10}$~inch, and so on, meaning
+by the fraction the approximate distance it must be
+brought to the object in order that the latter may be
+seen. The higher the power, the shorter this distance.
+A one-tenth inch objective may magnify an object a
+thousand diameters and perhaps more, so that a blood
+corpuscle having a diameter of only one three-thousandth
+of an inch may appear about three-tenths of an
+inch in diameter, and the details of its coarser structure
+may be very well seen; but if there be a minute
+point upon it, still indistinct because it is minute, and
+a still greater magnifying power required to see it, and a
+$\dfrac{1}{20}$~objective be taken, the actual magnifying power
+may be five thousand diameters. But now one is
+approaching the dimensions of wave lengths themselves,
+and the agent necessary for observing introduces
+its own complications, producing distortions and
+color fringes about the point to be studied, and no way
+\DPPageSep{162.png}{150}%
+has been found of obviating this. Objectives have
+been made having a focal length of only the $\dfrac{1}{50}$~of an
+inch and one having only the~$\dfrac{1}{75}$, but no work of any
+importance has ever been done with them. The best
+of the microscopic work has been done with lenses that
+magnify no more than one thousand diameters. It is
+said that the best microscopes will show an object that
+is no more than about the one hundred-thousandth of
+an inch in diameter, but it appears simply as a point or
+a line, and no details of its structure can be seen.
+Fine rulings upon glass have been made that are known
+to have this degree of fineness, because the mechanism
+that rules them can be gauged to that degree; but
+many persons cannot see these in a microscope, though
+others can. So within the limits of the visible not a
+little depends upon the acuteness of vision, and there
+is a great difference among individuals in this respect.
+On account of the properties of the ether waves themselves
+in their relations to each other, it does not
+appear probable that much improvement is possible to
+the microscope. This does not imply that we may not
+know more of the minute structure of bodies than we
+do now, for there are other sources of knowledge of
+minute quantities than simply direct eyesight, which
+are just as reliable, perhaps more so. A good chemical
+balance will weigh to the millionth part of the load.
+Whitworth showed that it was possible to measure to
+the millionth of an inch by touch. The spectroscope
+will indicate the millionth of a grain by the tint of the
+\DPPageSep{163.png}{151}%
+gas flame, and the color of a drop of water is appreciably
+changed by the one three-millionth of a grain of
+fuschine. Some substances, like essential oils, sulphuretted
+hydrogen, and the odors of flowers, can be
+perceived when the quantity is certainly less than the
+fifty-millionth of a grain.
+
+Any day may bring tidings of new instrumentalities
+that help in the solutions of the interesting questions
+concerning molecular structure that are now quite out
+of our reach. Let it be granted that the problems are
+altogether physical ones, such as are justified by the
+known mechanical relations of energy, and one may
+wait with patience. Let one assume that some or any
+of them are not mechanical, and he not only is in danger
+of having to revise his judgment in some degree any
+day, but he reasons against the significance of all the
+knowledge we have of matter and its energy.
+
+The larger a lens is the more light can go through it:
+a lens two feet in diameter will let four times as much
+light through it as one only one foot in diameter. As
+remote objects, like the distant stars, appear dim on
+account of their great distance, it becomes needful to
+concentrate the light from a much larger area than that
+of the pupil of the eye. If the pupil be one-tenth of an
+inch in diameter, a certain amount of light from a star
+may enter it. A lens one inch in diameter would concentrate
+at its focus $100$~times as much, and one a
+foot in diameter, $14400$~times more; and hence the
+object would appear so much brighter. Along with
+this apparent brightening of the star, it is apparently
+brought nearer and enlarged. There are limits to the
+\DPPageSep{164.png}{152}%
+size and useful magnifying power of telescopes as well
+as to those of microscopes. The magnifying power
+of telescopes depends very largely upon the eye-pieces
+used, and the shorter their focal length the more do
+they magnify. The large lens, called the objective,
+serves mostly to collect a large amount of light. It is to
+be kept in mind that the movements of bodies are magnified
+as much as their apparent dimensions, and when
+there are any movements of the body surveyed, or of
+the instrument itself, distinct vision becomes correspondingly
+difficult.
+
+With the telescope the chief trouble comes from
+movements of the air, which are rarely of uniform quality
+and motions. Not only its transparency, but its degrees
+of density caused by heat and wind, are varying all the
+time; and these seriously interfere with telescopic work.
+If a magnifying power of say~$100$ be employed, these
+disturbing causes are increased in proportion, and with a
+power of~$1000$ nothing can be distinctly seen. Suppose,
+however, the air be in best condition for observations,
+and a power of~$1000$ be put upon the moon. As
+the moon is about $240000$ miles away, this magnifying
+power would have the effect of bringing it $1000$~times
+nearer, or as it would appear to the eye if it were
+but $240$~miles away. Now, an object $240$~miles away
+can reveal no interesting details at all; anything much
+less than half a mile square could not be distinguished
+unless it were a very bright or very dark spot. Powers
+as high as~$8000$ have been used; and such a one would
+bring the surface of the moon as it would appear if it
+were about thirty miles distant, which might show a
+\DPPageSep{165.png}{153}%
+city, a large town, a lake, and the difference between
+field and woodland, yet nothing satisfactory was seen
+for the reasons mentioned, so for most astronomical
+work a magnifying power of only a few hundred is
+used; seldom more than five hundred. When large
+telescopes are set on elevated places like the Lick
+Telescope on Mt.~Hamilton in California, some of the
+troubles from disturbed air are obviated, and it is hoped
+something more may be learned about our nearer astronomic
+neighbors. But these large telescopes collect
+so much more light that stars so distant as to be quite
+invisible with smaller glasses become plainly visible
+with them. With the unaided eye no more than $5000$
+or $6000$~stars can be seen in the whole heavens, with
+an opera-glass as many as $100000$ become visible, while
+the Lick telescope, with an object-glass three feet in
+diameter, shows nearly $100,000000$. Each increase in
+the size of the telescope adds to the number of visible
+stars, and one cannot but wonder if their number be
+infinite, or if there be a boundary to the universe of
+matter. Though the visible boundary of our universe
+has been greatly extended by the invention of the telescope,
+nothing has been descried anywhere but matter
+and motion: there has been nothing added to our knowledge
+but the sense of bigness. Instead of only a few
+thousand of hot and flaming stars, there are hundreds
+of millions of them, made of the same kinds of matter,
+having the same kinds of motions, controlled by the
+same laws, and nothing animate in any of them more
+than in a bowlder in the wall. Clifford said he wished
+they were farther off. The problems of astronomy are
+\DPPageSep{166.png}{154}%
+\index{Space, navigation of}%
+interesting studies in mechanics, but are not inviting to
+those most interested in life and mind. Herschel and
+Chalmers and Dick and Mitchell are dead. The
+knowledge already gained has destroyed both their
+arguments and hopes, and has left the inhabitants of
+this earth the possessors of the universe, yet unable to
+take possession.
+
+If there are inhabitants in Mars they are as unable to
+traverse space as we are; and the possibility of our yet
+being able to do that is not half so unlikely as it seemed
+to be but a very few years ago, since it evidently requires
+for accomplishment but a directed reaction against
+the ether; and we already know how to produce the
+reaction by electrical means; and every point in space
+has the energy for transformation.
+
+It is generally agreed that the so-called attraction of
+a magnet for its armature is really due to the pressure
+of the ether upon the latter, and it may be as great as
+two hundred pounds to the square inch.
+
+An electro-magnet without an armature is therefore
+reacted upon by the ether to that degree. When this
+reaction can in any way be neutralized at one pole and
+not at the other, the ether reaction will push the magnet
+backwards, and the navigation of space will at once
+become mechanically possible.
+
+
+\Section{THE RADIOMETER.}
+\index{Radiometer}%
+
+It is a familiar enough fact that when sunshine falls
+upon a surface the latter becomes heated. In general,
+the darker the color of the surface the more rapidly %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.5in}{167a}
+ \Caption{12}{Diag.\ 12.---Radiometer.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+does
+the temperature rise; and some bodies, when thus exposed
+\DPPageSep{167.png}{155}%
+for some time, become unbearably hot. We are
+able to say that the surface molecules of such a body
+are in a brisk vibratory movement; that they have more
+energy than other bodies with less temperature. If one
+imagines the condition of things when the molecules of
+the air impinge upon such a heated surface, he will understand
+how they must bound away
+from it with greater velocity than
+they struck it with, and if with
+greater velocity, then with greater
+energy. As action and reaction are
+equal, it must kick back upon the
+surface as it leaves it, thus tending
+to make the surface move in the
+opposite direction; and a large number
+of such impacts must give a resultant
+backward pressure. If the
+surface be a small one, the increased
+pressure in the air in front will
+travel round to the other side at
+the rate of eleven hundred feet in a
+second in ordinary air; so the pressure
+will be equalized in a very short
+interval of time. If the air be rarefied
+in front of such surface to such a degree that the
+free path of the molecule is many times greater than
+its ordinary length, that pressure cannot get round
+nearly so fast, and there will consequently be a constant
+backward pressure, produced by the molecules that impinge
+upon it and become heated by contact with it.
+The pressure per square inch is very slight, as it is
+\DPPageSep{168.png}{156}%
+produced by a relatively small number of molecules;
+but it may be made apparent by mounting some disks,
+blackened on one side, upon a pivot in a glass bulb,
+and, after exhausting a large part of the air, hermetically
+sealing the bulb. Such a device is called a radiometer.
+When put where sunshine, or the light from
+the flame of a lamp or candle, or even the heat of the
+hand, may fall upon it, the vanes begin to rotate, the
+blackened side backing away from the source of the
+energy. This movement was at first interpreted as
+being due to the actual pressure produced by light
+waves, but further investigation showed that idea to be
+wrong. The movement comes from the transformation
+of the motions of ether waves, first into heat, and
+second into the translational mass motion observed.
+The radiometer is, therefore, a machine for transforming
+ether waves into visible mechanical motions.
+
+
+\Section{PHOTOGRAPHY.}
+\index{Photography}%
+
+It has already been explained how heat acts upon
+molecules, increasing the amplitude of the vibrations of
+the atoms that make them up, and, if carried to a sufficient
+degree, is able to quite destroy the molecular structure
+and enable the component atoms to enter into new
+combinations. The degree needed for this depends upon
+the kind of molecules. Some molecules are so stable
+that only the very highest temperature we can produce
+can break them up. Others are so feebly cohesive that
+the least touch will cause them to go to pieces, and
+sometimes with explosive violence, as is the case with
+what are called fulminates, compounds of nitrogen with
+\DPPageSep{169.png}{157}%
+silver or with mercury; and sometimes the same result
+is reached by ether waves, whose number per second is
+such as to set one of the ingredients into sympathetic
+vibration and thus decompose the compound, doing it
+at a slower rate than the others. Nearly all complex
+molecules are decomposable in this way, and the process
+is going on all the time in nature where there are organic
+things to act upon, but the process is usually
+slow.
+
+When shingles are first laid they have a fresh surface
+and new appearance, which is presently lost by
+the exposure. Take a freshly planed piece of soft
+pine or other white wood, and fasten to the surface a
+piece of paper cut into any shape or design,---a circle,
+a star, or the like,---and set the wood where the sun
+can shine on it for a few days. When the design is
+removed the figure will be plainly seen on the wood by
+the difference in tint between its surface and that part
+which the sun has shone upon. The latter is much
+darker. This is an example of photographic action,
+as is the color of fruit, etc.; for if a design is pasted
+upon a green apple, which is red when ripe, the design
+will protect the surface from the action of the light,
+and will therefore appear upon the apple in a light tint.
+Diagrams and letters may be fixed thus upon fruit of
+any kind. Discolorations of all sorts, due to ether
+waves or light, may properly be called photographic
+action, both fading and darkening, as when the skin
+becomes tanned. For practical purposes some compounds
+of silver are generally employed, because they
+are more sensitive to the action of visible waves than
+\DPPageSep{170.png}{158}%
+most other substances. They have the property of
+being easily disorganized by waves whose length
+ranges from about one forty-five-thousandth of an inch
+to those in the neighborhood of the seventy-thousandth
+of an inch, some of these being visible waves, the
+others being too short for visibility. When a surface is
+prepared with some one of the sensitive salts of silver,---generally
+the iodide or the bromide,---and a picture
+of an object produced by the lenses of the camera
+is allowed to fall upon it, the decomposing action is
+proportional to the amount of light and shade in the
+different parts; and, when the plate thus exposed is
+placed in certain chemical solutions called developers,
+the decomposition is completed and the products dissolved
+out, leaving a coating of pure silver, with a
+thickness proportional to the chemical action that has
+taken place. This gives, then, a correct likeness of
+the picture that was in the camera. Formerly it took
+a long time to produce such a picture, a person having
+to sit still for half an hour or more. More and more
+sensitive preparations were produced, until now a good
+picture can be taken in less than the thousandth of a
+second; and the practice of the art has become a great
+industry. There are many preparations in common
+use for taking such pictures, but nearly all of them
+have silver for the chief constituent. It may be
+remarked that silver compounds are remarkably unstable.
+Silver is not easily oxydized\DPnote{** [sic]}, for it remains
+untarnished for an indefinite time, as exemplified by
+coins and jewelry. But there are plenty of other compounds
+that may be used. Thus the common blue-print\DPnote{** Hyphenated across page, no other instances.}
+\DPPageSep{171.png}{159}%
+\index{Silver salts unstable}%
+is a compound of iron. The salts of chromium
+are also sensitive to such waves.
+
+It was remarked that the salts of silver are sensitive
+to ether waves between quite a wide range in wave
+lengths, but the longest of them is in about the middle
+of the visible spectrum. They reach from there into
+the region beyond the violet. Yellow and red waves
+are incapable of affecting such a preparation, while the
+waves that are the most efficient for it are the blue
+ones.
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{171a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{13}{Diag.\ 13.---Photographic Range for Silver Salts.}
+\end{figure}
+
+Other substances have a different range, and a curious
+chemical discovery has shown that silver molecules
+may be loaded; that is, may have attached to them in
+a temporary way some other kinds of molecules that
+render them sensitive to waves of any length. If an
+ordinary photographic plate has a solar spectrum
+thrown upon it, there will be no indication of action
+below the green; but, if aniline be added to the sensitive
+coating and the plate be then exposed in the same
+way, the action will now be seen to have gone on to a
+distance below even the longest red wave that can be
+seen. In this way photography has shown that the
+spectrum of most incandescent bodies is much longer
+than the visible part of it in both directions. It was
+the observation that photographic action took place
+\DPPageSep{172.png}{160}%
+\index{Molecules, loaded}%
+most strongly in the blue part of the solar spectrum,
+and in the region beyond, that led to the belief that
+light waves and chemical rays were, in some way,
+unlike each other. From what has been said it will be
+seen that the reason for the different action was due to
+the character of the material used. When a molecule
+is made bigger or heavier in any way, longer waves can
+affect it more; and that is the significance of the so-called
+loaded molecule. In reality, the whole molecule
+is made more complex and bigger, and longer waves
+can shake its atoms loose.
+
+It is to be hoped that all can understand that there
+is nothing mysterious about photographic action; that
+it is as simple in its mechanical principles as anything
+can be. One may not be able at once to say in
+any given case which atoms or which parts of a molecule
+are loosened by the vibratory strains. In this one
+it may be the nitrogen, in another it may be the silver,
+and in still a third it may be oxygen; but in each case
+the mode of action is the same, and it may be said to
+be mechanical throughout.
+
+
+\Section{VISION.}
+
+Our various senses differ much in their mode of
+action, and require for excitation not only each its
+proper stimulant, but degrees of remoteness from
+actual contact to the most distant points. Thus the
+sense of touch requires absolute contact of a body: so
+also does taste,---the sugar or the salt must dissolve
+upon the tongue. A distance of but the tenth of an
+inch between the sugar and the tongue will be absolutely
+\DPPageSep{173.png}{161}%
+prohibitive to the consciousness of sweetness.
+The sense of smell requires the actual contact of the
+gaseous molecules upon the nasal membrane, but currents
+of air and gaseous diffusion secure to us this condition,
+so that the emanating body itself may be at
+some distance, and yet we become conscious of the
+bank of violets, the cup of coffee, or the chemical laboratory.
+This sense, therefore, enlarges our field, so to
+speak, and permits us to be conscious of bodies out of
+our immediate reach. The sense of sound still farther
+enlarges the space that can react upon us. But the
+loudest sounds, such as the roar of cannon and thunder,
+lose their intensity shortly, and can rarely be
+heard beyond a few miles. If our endowment of
+senses stopped with these, we should really be quite
+\index{Senses}%
+limited in our possible knowledge; for as we can know
+only what comes into our experience, how small the
+possibilities of existence would be to us! What we
+could touch, taste, smell, and hear we could know something
+about, though we were unconscious of any lacking
+sense. We should need some apparatus that could
+make us conscious of the most distant things as well
+as those close at hand. We should need just what we
+have got,---the sense of sight, that extends the field of
+experience and of interest to us to the boundaries
+of creation. The other senses give us information of
+contiguous things, but sight brings the universe itself
+to our consciousness.
+
+The sense of touch is diffused all over our bodies.
+There is no such thing as an organ of touch. The
+senses of taste and smell are restricted to localities and
+\DPPageSep{174.png}{162}%
+to organs that have other functions as well. Only sound
+and sight have specific organs, having no other function
+than to respond to sonorous and optical motions, and
+thus they have a peculiar dignity in the physiological
+mechanism; and precisely because the eye and ear have
+these mechanical functions do they come into the domain
+of physics. They are machines by which certain forms
+of motion are transformed into others suitable for nerve
+transmission to the seat of consciousness.
+
+It has often been pointed out that the structure of
+the eye is like the camera of the photographer. In each
+\index{Camera}%
+there is a chamber~\textit{a}, having a lens in front, which has
+a length %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{174a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{14}{Diag.\ 14.}
+\end{figure}
+of focus adapted to the distance between it and
+the back of the chamber, so that the image of objects
+external to it will be produced by it upon the back of
+the chamber, where there is in each a sensitive coating
+so affected by the light as to make an impress. In the
+camera this action has been explained as chemical
+reaction when molecular dissociation results, proportionate
+to the amount of light that falls upon any part
+of the surface exposed.
+
+In each there is an arrangement for altering the focal
+distance of the lens. In the camera it is a ratchet-wheel
+that moves the lens towards or away from the
+back. In the eye there are muscles attached to the
+\DPPageSep{175.png}{163}%
+edge of the lens that by contracting make the pliable
+lens less convex and so increase its focal length. For
+the camera %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[15]{r}{2.25in}
+ \Graphic{2.25in}{175a}
+ \Caption{15}{Diag.\ 15.---Photographic Camera.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+there is
+\index{Camera}%
+an exchangeable diaphragm
+having perforations
+of various
+sizes to admit more
+or less light through
+the lens. In the eye
+there is a colored
+muscular disk called
+the iris, that contracts
+or expands in
+an automatic way so
+as to expose more or
+less of the lens to
+the light. The functions
+of the two devices are identical.
+
+The energy possessed by the ether waves that fall
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{175b}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{16}{Diag.\ 16.}
+\end{figure}
+upon the sensitive photographic plate is spent in doing
+\DPPageSep{176.png}{164}%
+\index{Vision, phenomena of}%
+the molecular work of disintegration. In the eye all
+the energy is stopped at the sensitive back coating
+called the retina, and must of course be accounted for
+in some physical way. In the camera all the energy of
+the waves is spent in precisely the same kind of a way;
+that is, there is no such distinction as what is called
+color in it: and color photography---that is, the direct
+picture of objects in their proper, natural tints, such
+as we know they have, upon the sensitive plate---has
+not been accomplished, for the probable reason that the
+colors of the molecules that are the result of the decomposition
+of the silver compound are either transparent
+or blueish black. In the eye, the distinction between
+wave lengths which we denominate color sensation is
+very pronounced.
+
+The sensations are so much complicated with the
+processes that induce them that it is not always easy to
+keep in mind the purely physical side or the subjective
+side while treating of them.
+
+The following are some of the more common phenomena
+of vision which must be taken into account in forming
+any judgment or theory of it.
+
+When a firebrand is swung round and round it
+leaves an apparent luminous trail, the length of which
+depends upon the rapidity of motion. This is called the
+persistence of vision, and indicates that the sensation
+does not cease instantly after the source has gone. If
+the brand be swung round at the uniform rate of once
+per second, the length of this luminous trail will be a
+rough measure of the duration of the sensation after it
+is once excited. Thus, if it appeared to be one-quarter
+\DPPageSep{177.png}{165}%
+of the circle, the sensation must last for one-fourth
+a second. For impressions not very bright the sensation
+lasts but about the tenth of a second. If, however,
+the object looked at be very bright, like the sun, for an
+instant, the sensation may last for many seconds; and,
+in general, the older the person the longer does it last.
+
+Different colors also have different degrees of persistence.
+\index{Colors}%
+Violet, blue, and green soonest fade out, and red
+is the last to vanish for most eyes. This signifies that
+wave length has in someway to do with the persistence.
+When a bright colored object, like a bit of red paper,
+is put upon a sheet of white paper and steadily looked
+at for a few seconds, and is then suddenly removed while
+the eyes are kept fixed upon the same place, the image
+of the red paper will still be seen, but it will appear with
+a green tint, and will fade out in a few seconds. A
+green piece of paper, or any green object looked at in
+the same manner, will give an image in red. Blue ones
+give yellow, and yellow blue; and these tints seen in
+this way are called complementary to each other, as it is
+found by combining such together they produce the
+sensation of white light. Whiteness is therefore a compound
+sensation. Formerly, it was thought that white
+was only produced by the composition of all the colors
+of the spectrum in the same proportions they exist in it;
+but the same sensation of whiteness can be produced
+by red, green, and violet, and by blue and yellow. This
+is not to be understood as applying to pigments or
+paints, but to light itself.
+
+If one looks at a strongly lighted object intently for
+a few seconds, and then turns his eyes to a dimly
+\DPPageSep{178.png}{166}%
+\index{Vision, hallucinations of}%
+\index{Vision, energy needed for}%
+lighted drab surface, he will be able to see, sometimes
+in a surprisingly realistic way, the same object against
+the new background. If it be a person looked at,
+the features may even appear in a startling way.
+The size of the subjective figure will depend upon
+the distance of the background, being larger the more
+remote that is. Age and health have much to do
+with the persistence of such sensations\DPtypo{}{.} Young and
+vigorous persons seldom notice them until they
+carefully look for them; while older ones, and especially
+weakened ones, may be much troubled by
+them. Some nervous systems react upon the eye itself,
+and give rise to similar images there; and these subjective
+images have not unfrequently been mistaken for
+objective persons living or dead. The color a given
+object appears to have is not unfrequently modified by
+what colors the eye has been resting upon the instant
+before, and hence two persons may look at once upon
+the same picture and see it in very different tints.
+
+As ether waves are the source of the sensation, it is
+obvious that a certain number of consecutive waves
+must be necessary to affect the eye; that is to say, it is
+not in the least probable that a single wave of any
+length could produce a sensation. How many are
+needed is not known, but one can determine somewhere
+near what the number must be if he knows how
+brief a time is sufficient to produce a sensation. It is
+said that some flashes of lightning have been found to
+occur in less than a millionth of a second, and those
+may produce a very strong sensation.
+
+If there are five hundred million million vibrations per
+\DPPageSep{179.png}{167}%
+second, as we know there must be to give such a sensation,
+in the millionth of a second there must be five
+hundred millions; if the brightness were reduced ten
+thousand times and it were still visible, there must
+then have been not less than fifty thousand waves: and
+this is equivalent to saying that the eye could perceive
+light if it lasted no longer than the ten thousand
+millionth part of a second, which is probably true.
+But there is another condition; namely, the \emph{energy}
+of the waves must be sufficient to effect a physical
+change in the eye; and we know that the energy of
+such ether waves varies with the square of their amplitude.
+If, then, any wave whatever has not energy sufficient
+to produce the necessary physical disturbance in
+the eye, it could not produce vision. And this is the
+most probable reason that we do not see in what we
+now call darkness. It has been shown that all matter
+at all temperatures is vibrating and setting up ether
+waves, and also that in all liquids as well as solid
+bodies there are vibrations due to their atomic and
+molecular interference; and, theoretically, there must
+be vibrations of all wave lengths at all times and in all
+places, but at low temperatures the shorter waves,
+though not absent, would have but small energy, and,
+as the body becomes hot and the shorter ones acquire
+more, it is done at the expense of the energy of the
+longer ones, for the light given out by an incandescent
+lamp increases faster than the supply of energy to produce
+it. It therefore appears as a necessary conclusion
+that the reason we cannot see in the dark is not so
+much because the waves of proper wave length are
+\DPPageSep{180.png}{168}%
+\index{Vision of animals}%
+\index{Vision, theory of}%
+entirely absent, as that they have too little energy to
+affect our eyes. Other animals, such as rats, mice,
+owls, bats, and the like, can see where it appears to us
+to be pitch dark. They must, therefore, have eyes
+adapted for longer wave lengths than are ours, or else
+the sensitiveness of their eyes exceeds ours. As
+they see readily in the daylight, it is certain they are
+adapted to such waves as our eyes are; and, if ours
+were sufficiently sensitive, or had a greater range in
+effective wave lengths, there would be no such condition
+as darkness. That is the same as saying that
+darkness is in us rather than being a condition external
+to us.
+
+
+\Section{THE THEORY OF VISION.}
+
+When it was discovered that the sensation of whiteness
+could be produced by combining three different
+colors,---red, green, and violet,---it was inferred that
+there were probably three sets of nerves that were spread
+as a fine net-work over the retina so that either of these
+rays might fall at any point in the field of vision upon
+it and so produce the sensation. At the same time,
+when one or two of them were absent, the other nerve
+ingredient would be present to be affected; and, furthermore,
+each one of these three nerves was sensitive to
+quite a wide range of wave lengths, and their overlappings
+gave perception without any break from the
+extreme red to the extreme violet. In this way color
+perception could be explained. This view was adopted
+as a working hypothesis; and there was no other proposed,
+although there was no evidence whatever for the
+\DPPageSep{181.png}{169}%
+existence of three sets of nerves having different properties.
+It has, however, lately been discovered that
+the retina secretes a substance called purpurine, on
+\index{Purpurine}%
+account of its purple tint, which is very rapidly
+bleached or decomposed by the action of light. That
+is to say, it possesses photographic properties in a
+marked degree. This discovery has led to the view that
+vision may be altogether due to photographic action,
+and the older view has been about abandoned. The
+details of this theory have not yet been all worked out,
+but the purport of it may be briefly stated.
+
+Given the purpurine spread over the retina: this
+would be its sensitive coating corresponding to the silver
+preparation upon the photographic plate. The
+action of the light upon it being the same in character,
+decomposes it into simpler molecular compounds. The
+optic nerve is certainly spread over the retina, and the
+purpurine is in its meshes, and any disturbance taking
+place in this substance must correspondingly affect the
+ends of the nerves imbedded in it. Given the disturbance
+that can affect the optic nerves, and it is transmitted
+at once to the base of the brain and there interpreted
+as light sensation. The differences there might
+be in the amount of disturbance would be the differences
+that are called brightness or intensity. If molecules
+are disintegrated, as in photographic action, there
+must be a relatively large amount of free-path motion
+resulting from the wave action in the eye, and the
+amount of it proportional to the energy expended.
+Such an effect would give a general sensation of light,
+probably, also, effects of light and shade, so the forms of
+\DPPageSep{182.png}{170}%
+bodies would be readily enough seen. It would also
+account for persistent effects; for, when molecules are
+made to move fast or slow, they do not cease instantly
+on the removal of the source of the motion, but they
+continue to thus move until their energy has been
+reduced to that of the surrounding medium. With
+simple purpurine there appears to be no more possibility
+of chromatic effects than there is in the common
+silver preparation on the photographic plate. Suppose,
+however, the purpurine to be not a simple kind of a
+body, or made up of only a single kind of molecules,
+but instead made up of as many as three different
+kinds having as many different molecular weights, and,
+therefore, capable of being reacted upon by three different
+wave lengths. Call these three substances \textit{a},~\textit{b},
+and \textit{c}~purpurine. Let \textit{a}~be such as red waves can
+decompose, \textit{b}~such as green ones can decompose, and \textit{c}~such
+as only the short purple ones can break up or
+shake up. If these are uniformly mixed together and
+spread over the eye, then red waves would shake up
+the red constituent, but would leave the others alone;
+and the same would hold true of the others. If one
+has been looking at red-light wave lengths, the \textit{a}~purpurine
+would be used up, but the \textit{b} and~\textit{c} would still be
+present unimpaired; and now, when white light is again
+looked at, the \textit{b}~and~\textit{c} would be acted on strongly because
+they are present in greater quantity. The resulting
+sensation would be the compound of these two
+reactions, which, as is well known, is a greenish tint.
+In a like manner, each of the others when used up
+would leave the same field fresh with the other constituents,
+\DPPageSep{183.png}{171}%
+\index{Color-blindness}%
+\index{Retina, its functions}%
+and so give the complementary tints; and in
+this way chromatic effects of all sorts can be accounted
+for.
+
+Some persons are color-blind; that is, they are
+unable to distinguish some colors; and this defect is
+usually for red rays. Such a color-blind person will be
+unable to see the red end of the spectrum, and the
+colors of it will appear to leave off in the yellow or
+orange. The old explanation was that the red sensation
+nerves were absent. The newer explanation is
+that the \textit{a}~ingredient of the purpurine is wanting either
+partially or altogether.
+
+Of course it is to be understood that the products of
+decomposition by light in the eye are removed and
+fresh material secreted in its place by the organ itself
+in a manner similar to the removal of waste tissue and
+its repair in any other part of the system.
+
+The function of the retina, then, would appear to be
+the secretion of the sensitive substance needed for
+vision, instead of itself being the sensitive substance.
+
+Such an explanation of vision makes the eye still
+more like the photographic camera than appears in its
+outward form and mechanical functions. And thus one
+is able to trace the forms of motion that constitute the
+heat and the temperature of a body through its resultant
+ether waves to the molecular break-ups at the ends
+of nerve fibres, whence the characteristic motions are
+transmitted to the base of the brain, to be interpreted
+thus or thus, according to position, number, and energy.
+We begin with motion, we end with motion at the
+seat of consciousness, and there we stop. It is vibratory
+\DPPageSep{184.png}{172}%
+in the hot body it starts from, it is undulatory
+motion in the ether, it is oscillatory in the disrupted
+molecules, and a longitudinal wave in the nerve.
+Whether it is discharged from further service at the
+base of the brain, or is stored up in some way as experience,
+no one can say; but it is certain that a relatively
+large amount of molecular energy finds its way constantly
+to the brain, and some of it is re-employed as
+reflex action, giving rise to voluntary and involuntary
+\index{Reflex action}%
+muscular and secretory processes, as when one winks, or
+dodges a threatening motion before the will can act, or
+laughs or weeps at sights and sounds. In either case
+the result is the physical expression of a physical antecedent,
+with an intermediate mental quality called
+emotion.
+
+The eye may then be said to be a machine for the
+transformation of ether waves into interpretable molecular
+or atomic motions, and its function ceases at the
+ends of the optic nerve.
+%\DPPageSep{185.png}{173}%
+
+
+\Chapter{VIII}{Electricity}{173}
+
+\First{The} industrial applications of electricity are now so
+extensive and varied that every one is acquainted with
+them in some measure, and yet fifteen years ago there
+were millions of persons in the civilized nations who
+had never seen an electrical phenomenon with the exception
+of lightning. The apparently capricious behavior
+of lightning, together with the attractions and repulsions
+exhibited by electrified bodies, were phenomena
+so different in character from any other, that it came
+to be looked upon as a very mysterious force. Fifty
+and more years ago it was classed with heat and light
+as one of the imponderables. To-day even the question
+is often asked, What \emph{is} electricity? with the
+emphasis on the word ``is,'' as if one knowing enough
+might describe it as he might describe a genii or an
+object having specific qualities that might be isolated
+from everything else. Some have thought it to be a
+fluid, some two fluids, some vibratory molecular motion,
+some a property of matter, some a motion in the ether,
+some the ether itself; and, lastly, some have concluded
+that we do not and never can know its nature.
+Hence, to-day there is no generally received notion
+concerning its nature.
+\DPPageSep{186.png}{174}%
+\index{Electricity, origin of}%
+\index{Electricity, thermal}%
+\index{Thermodynamics, electric}%
+
+Still, one may know a great deal about the agent
+itself,---how it originates, what it will do, and its relations
+to other phenomena,---and not concern himself at
+all as to the nature of it. Heat and many of its laws
+were well known before any one knew or even suspected
+what its nature was. The law of gravitation
+is known and applied on the scale of the universe without
+demanding any explanation of the phenomena, and
+it is equally true that our knowledge of electricity is
+very extensive and accurate, and doubtless what we do
+not know to-day we may know to-morrow.
+
+
+\Section{ORIGIN OF ELECTRICITY.}
+
+It is here to be assumed as known, that various
+instruments, such as electrometers and galvanometers,
+are employed to detect the presence of electricity, and
+descriptions of them will not be given. Attention will
+be paid chiefly to the conditions that are present when
+electricity is generated.
+
+\Section{1. THERMAL ORIGIN.}
+
+When two different metals, such for instance as copper
+and iron, are touched together, they are found to be
+electrified; that is, an electrometer shows the presence
+of electricity. A piece of copper wire twisted to a
+piece of iron wire always becomes thus affected, but
+the effect is so slight that only delicate and sensitive
+apparatus will detect it. Wires of any of the metals
+under similar circumstances exhibit the same phenomenon,
+but in different degrees. This electrification is
+but transient; in a few seconds it has vanished. If the
+\DPPageSep{187.png}{175}%
+junction of the metals is heated by the fingers, or in
+any other way, the electrical condition is maintained
+indefinitely. If one will imagine such a compound wire
+bent into a ring so the ends nearly touch each other,
+it could be shown that the ends attract each other, the
+attraction being but slight. Here we are not so much
+concerned about the measure of what is taking place
+as with its character. If the ends of the wires be
+allowed to touch, and the twisted junction be kept warm,
+a current of electricity will continue to circulate through
+the ring; and, if the ends be connected to a galvanometer
+of sufficient delicacy, the needle would be
+continuously deflected, so long as the junction was
+warmer than the outer ends of the wires; and the deflection
+of the needle would be found to vary with the
+difference in temperature between the inner and outer
+junctions. Some metals, such as bismuth and antimony,
+when fastened by solder, or in any other way, give much
+stronger effects with a given temperature at their junction.
+Such a combination is called a thermo-electric
+pair. By joining a number of such together, so that
+alternate ends may be heated at once, the electrical
+effect is increased proportionally: two will give twice,
+and ten ten times as much, and so on. When a number
+of these are nicely compacted together and provided
+with binding-screws, they are called thermo-electric
+piles, and are of service in some investigations. It is
+not necessary, however, to have two different metals in
+contact to obtain the same kind of effects. If a piece
+of soft iron or platinum wire be wound into a close coil
+about a lead-pencil and the ends of it connected to a
+\DPPageSep{188.png}{176}%
+galvanometer, a current of electricity will traverse the
+circuit when one end of the coil is heated in a flame.
+If the other end be heated, the current will go in the
+opposite direction. The twisting of the wire into
+the coil produces a strain among the molecules that
+changes the physical properties to a slight extent: the
+density is altered. It therefore appears that in this
+case, as in the cases with two different substances, we
+have two \emph{physically} \DPtypo{diferent}{different}
+bodies, though of
+the same element. The
+facts may be generalized
+by saying that, %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\index{Thermopile}%
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{2.5in}
+ \Graphic{2.5in}{188a}
+ \Caption{17}{Diag.\ 17.---Thermopile.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+whenever two differently
+constituted bodies
+are placed in contact
+with each other, electricity
+is generated, and
+is maintained so long
+as there is a difference
+in temperature between
+the junction and the external
+ends.
+
+If one inquires for the
+origin of such manifestation as the first case, when two
+different metals are placed in contact, attention must
+be directed to the actual molecular condition of the
+two metals. Suppose them to have the same temperature,---as
+they have different atomic weights their
+vibratory rates cannot be the same,---and when the
+surfaces are put in contact there must be a re-adjustment
+\DPPageSep{189.png}{177}%
+\index{Chemical origin of electricity}%
+of their molecular motions, for each will interfere
+with the other. This disturbance of molecular rates
+is a disturbance in their relations of energy, and
+furnishes the energy for the electrical phenomenon
+that ensues. When equilibrium is restored, as it may
+be shortly, there is no longer any electrical exhibit.
+
+When heat is applied so as to keep the junction continually
+hotter than the other parts, the first effect is
+continuous; for as each element has its own proper
+vibratory molecular rate, which is increased by the
+heat, the interference is kept up and an electrical current
+results, which the heat is spent to produce and
+maintain. One needs to have in mind what is signified
+by heat as vibratory atomic, and molecular motion, in
+order to clearly perceive what is expended in the
+thermo-electric pile. The face of the pile, when it is
+generating a current of electricity, does not acquire
+that temperature it would acquire if it was prevented
+from producing a current by having the wires detached.
+Hence the amplitude of vibrations is lessened by the
+electrical work done, and we may say that heat has
+been converted into electricity, a thermal origin.
+
+
+\Section{2. CHEMICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+When a piece of copper is dipped into a vessel of
+water, and a wire leading from it is connected to a
+proper electrometer, it is found to be electrified to a
+certain degree. If a piece of zinc be substituted for
+the copper, it too indicates a still greater degree; and
+now let both be placed in the same water and connected
+by a wire, and a current of electricity will flow through
+\DPPageSep{190.png}{178}%
+\index{Polarization of molecules}%
+the wire, as in the case with the thermopile. This
+current will be a transient one, or very slight, if the
+water be pure; but if a little acid like sulphuric be
+added to the water, the current may be relatively a
+strong one. If, %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[11]{l}{1in}
+ \Graphic{1in}{190a}
+ \Caption{18}{Diag.\ 18.\break Galvanic Cell.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+instead of the zinc and copper, any
+other two metals be taken, the results will differ from
+the former only in degree. Zinc and copper,
+or zinc and carbon, are generally employed,
+because those have been found to
+give better results than other available elements;
+and such a combination of metals,
+with some solution, acid or alkaline, which
+is capable of \DPtypo{disolving}{dissolving} one or both of the
+metals, is called a galvanic battery. A single
+\index{Galvanic battery}%
+jar with its proper elements is called a cell; and by
+the addition of cells additional effects may be produced;
+that is, with two cells twice, and with ten cells
+ten times the effect.
+
+As with the thermo-pair, one may inquire what conditions
+were known to be present that could furnish an
+antecedent to the electrical current that results. This
+is answered by pointing out, as in the other case, that
+there are two substances differing in their physical qualities,
+copper and water, or zinc and water, and molecular
+rearrangement at their junction must necessarily
+result. More than this. It is known that the zinc and
+oxygen have a strong affinity for each other. The oxygen
+is combined with hydrogen to form the water, and
+in water the molecules are without any definite arrangement:
+they face in all directions, and move about with
+the greatest freedom, with but little, if any friction.
+\DPPageSep{191.png}{179}%
+When zinc is placed in it, the attraction of the zinc for
+the oxygen part of the molecule must result in making
+every water molecule in proximity to the zinc swing
+round so as to present its oxygen side to it. This orientation
+of the liquid molecules is called their polarization.
+The attraction between the two is not quite
+strong enough to disrupt the water molecule; but the
+addition of sulphuric acid weakens the attraction between
+the hydrogen and oxygen, and enables the oxygen
+to seize a zinc atom, and both combine with the sulphuric
+acid to form the sulphate of zinc. Here we
+have chemical reactions such as always result in exchange
+of energy; for the sulphate of zinc has less
+molecular energy than the zinc, the water, and the
+acid, in the same way that carbonic acid gas has less
+energy than the carbon and oxygen gas that formed
+it. There has been, then, a molecular change accompanied
+by the development, first of heat and second
+the generation of electricity; for if the electrical current
+be not allowed to flow, the battery cell will itself
+heat up more than it otherwise would do. There are
+chemical, thermal, mechanical, and electrical phenomena
+here, which may be perceived by carefully thinking
+of the successive steps in the process. The distinctive
+thing here is to bear in mind what the characteristic
+antecedents of the electrical phenomena are. What are
+the chemical, the thermal, the mechanical factors, except
+special forms of exchangeable molecular motions?
+So one may say that in a galvanic battery chemism or
+heat has been transformed into electricity. Though
+the mechanism of transformation is different, yet the
+same factors appear as in the thermopile.
+\DPPageSep{192.png}{180}%
+
+
+\Section{3. MECHANICAL ORIGIN.}
+\index{Electricity, mechanical origin}%
+
+When a piece of glass or of wax is rubbed with a
+cloth or catskin, the two substances subject to the
+friction become endowed with a new property which
+they do not otherwise exhibit. If a glass disk be
+mounted so as to %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{192a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{19}{Diag.\ 19.---Static Electrical Machine.}
+\end{figure}
+be rotated, and proper connections
+made to it, as in the common Static Electrical machine,
+a current of electricity may be maintained by maintaining
+the friction, and all the electrical phenomena may
+be produced that can be with electricity from any other
+source. They are identical, but the source is the friction
+of dissimilar substances. It will be recalled that
+dissimilarity in substance was the condition in each of
+the former cases; but in this, mechanical friction is the
+\DPPageSep{193.png}{181}%
+\index{Electricity, magnetic origin}%
+\index{Stress, magnetic}%
+second factor. In the chapter on heat it was pointed
+out, and it is a familiar enough fact everywhere, that
+heat is always the immediate result of friction. So in
+this mechanical source, with apparatus so dissimilar in
+all outward form to both thermopile and galvanic battery,
+we still have precisely the same molecular conditions
+that were operative in them to produce electricity,---two
+dissimilar substances, and heat or a kind of motion
+that results at once in heat.
+
+
+\Section{4. MAGNETIC ORIGIN.}
+
+If a wire of any sort be placed across the pole of a
+magnet, and held quiet there, no electrical effect will
+be noted; but if the wire be moved toward or away from
+the pole, it will become electrified, and if one end of it
+be connected to an electrometer the movement of the
+needle will indicate it. If the two ends of the wire be
+connected to a galvanometer, whenever the wire is thus
+moved in front of the magnet pole a current will flow
+through the circuit, and the movement of the needle
+this way or that will indicate the motion of approach or
+recession. The strength of this current will vary with
+the rapidity of the motion of translation of the wire
+through the space in front of the magnet; and the wire
+through which it goes becomes heated. This is the
+same as saying that the mechanical motion of translation
+of the wire is converted into heat in a manner as if
+it had been subject to ordinary friction there; and as a
+matter of fact, it is found to require more energy to
+move the wire in such a space when the ends of the wire
+are in contact, than it does when they are not. This
+\DPPageSep{194.png}{182}%
+\index{Electricity, electrical origin}%
+shows that the material of the wire is subject to some
+restraint under such conditions and in such positions,
+and the degree of restraint depends upon the distance
+it is from the magnet, as well as upon the strength of
+the magnet itself. Hence the different parts of the
+wire are in different physical states. And this is just
+what is exhibited by the twisted wire in the case of
+the thermal origin; and when motion is imparted to the
+wire, the degrees of stress in it change, and a current of
+electricity is the result. That such a stress is really
+present in the wire can be proved in several ways,
+which only need to be alluded to in this place. First,
+the electrical resistance of a wire is greater when in
+front of a magnet than elsewhere; and second, the
+phenomenon known as Hall's, in which a current of
+electricity going through a conductor is deflected from
+its course in the neighborhood of a magnet. So we
+have, in this magnetic origin, two bodies with different
+physical constitutions and external motions impressed
+upon them, which gives the electrical product
+observed.
+
+
+\Section{5. ELECTRICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+Imagine two wires parallel to each other and a foot
+apart. If an electrical current from any source is made
+to traverse one of them, a corresponding current will
+be initiated in the other, but in the contrary direction.
+In a like manner if a constant current be kept in one
+of the wires, and the other one be moved towards and
+away from the other, currents will be set up in it.
+Their direction will depend upon whether the motion
+\DPPageSep{195.png}{183}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+\index{Stress, electrical}%
+be approach or recession. The effect is the same
+whether either or both move at the same time. The
+effect is similar to the one described under the head of
+Magnetic Origin, showing that in some way the space %[xref]
+about a wire having a current of electricity in it is substantially
+similar to that about a magnet. The process
+is called electro-magnetic induction in both cases, and
+the explanation is the same in this as in the other. It
+will be well, however, to point out that there are steps
+in this process that need attention for the sake of mechanical
+clearness.
+
+Given say, an electro-magnet, through which a current
+can be sent at will, and so be made magnetic,
+and with the wire in front of it as before. There is
+now no magnetism and no electricity in the wire.
+Make the iron magnetic, and the current is at once induced
+in the other. I say at once, but this does not
+mean instantaneously. It takes a short time for the
+effect of the magnet upon the ether to travel to the wire
+and affect it. As no electricity escapes from the electro-magnetic
+circuit, the electricity observed in the wire,
+or second circuit, is generated in it, and the \emph{immediate}
+antecedent of it was the stress in the ether which was
+produced by the magnet. Hence an electrical current
+can arise from a proper kind of stress in the ether, no
+matter how that is produced, as one of the factors; the
+other factor being motion of some sort, mechanical or
+otherwise. The steps are, an electric current in a conductor,
+an electro-magnetic effect of the current upon
+the ether, the reaction of the ether upon the second conductor.
+Let these steps be kept in mind always when
+\DPPageSep{196.png}{184}%
+thinking about inductive action, and there can then be
+no confusion from trying to imagine how electricity
+gets from one circuit to another when they are insulated
+from each other.
+
+
+\Section{6. PHYSIOLOGICAL ORIGIN.}
+
+There are certain kinds of fish that are capable of
+giving powerful electrical shocks to men and animals.
+They are provided with special organs for this purpose,
+but they have not been the subject of much study for
+several good reasons. First, they are only to be found
+in a few localities, and are difficult to obtain; and second,
+their electrical qualities cannot be studied except
+when they are alive; and when they are living and
+healthy their shocks can kill both men and animals,
+and few are willing to incur the risk. Both mankind and
+animals in general can give rise to electrical currents.
+By grasping with the thumb and finger of both hands
+the terminal wires from a delicate galvanometer, a current
+is indicated,---a part often due to thermo-electric
+action, and a part to physiological action,---and it will
+vary with the tightness of the squeeze of contact and
+the person experimenting, some developing much more
+relatively than others. It also varies with the parts of
+the body in contact with the wires. This physiological
+effect is always extremely minute, and is not to be
+mentioned beside the amount necessary to effect the
+remarkable things said to be done by personal electricity,
+such as moving chairs, tables, etc. I do not
+think any one has been found whose physiological
+electricity could do so much as raise a grain the tenth
+of an inch.
+\DPPageSep{197.png}{185}%
+
+The various processes continually going on in the
+body, such as breathing, digestion, blood-circulation,
+and muscular motions of all sorts, and under conditions
+of different temperatures, different material, different
+chemical reactions, are quite sufficient to account
+for all that has been observed in this direction.
+
+
+\Section{7. ATMOSPHERIC ORIGIN.}
+
+The origin of lightning, so far as details go, has
+\index{Lightning}%
+never been satisfactorily accounted for. It is obviously
+not an affair that can be investigated in any very scientific
+manner, for one can never control any of the conditions
+when it arises.
+
+Some have thought it due to the condensation of
+electrified vapor molecules condensing into drops of
+water, the degree of electrification increasing with the
+size of the drops. How the original electrification of
+the molecules was produced is not explained by such.
+There is no doubt but that a large amount of energy is
+often involved in a stroke of lightning, judged by its
+sudden destructive work. The immediate source of
+this energy is the question\DPtypo{}{.} There is no doubt but
+when a gas or a vapor is condensed into a liquid, a
+notable amount of energy is liberated in motions of
+some sort; for it requires energy to be spent upon water
+to produce the vapor. This is given back when the
+process is reversed. This energy has often been called
+latent heat. If this process goes on faster than it can
+be conducted away, it must either be transformed, or the
+process must stop\DPtypo{}{.} We know, too, that heat motions
+are most freely transformed into electrical by the phenomena
+\DPPageSep{198.png}{186}%
+\index{Electrical antecedents}%
+\index{Terminology, electrical}%
+of the thermopile and the galvanic battery,
+and it is not improbable that this is the source of the
+atmospheric electricity. It is certain that where it
+originates there are two differently constituted kinds of
+matter,---the air and the water; and it is equally certain
+that there are some vigorous exchanges of motion, both
+in the form of wind and heat, and these are the conditions
+present in each of the cases where our knowledge
+is most complete.
+
+One may then fairly conclude from the analysis of
+all the known sources of electrical development, that
+motion of some sort is the antecedent in every case.
+This motion may be the sort called mechanical, or that
+called molecular or atomic, as heat, but it is always a
+factor; and the amount of electrical energy developed
+in every case is equal to the \emph{immediate} mechanical,
+chemical, or thermal energy which disappears when it
+is produced. If one admits that the quantity of energy
+in phenomena is constant, that the quantity of matter
+is constant, there is but one variable factor, and that is
+motion. If mechanical motion is transformable into
+heat, and heat into electricity, and some known form of
+motion is the invariable antecedent to the production
+of electricity, it does not need a very profound logician
+to say, \emph{so far}, the nature of electricity is known.
+
+
+\Section{ELECTRICAL TERMINOLOGY.}
+
+Every particular science and art has some technical
+terms to give precision and definiteness to its processes
+and its laws, and the advances made in any science
+depend very largely upon exact signification of its
+\DPPageSep{199.png}{187}%
+terms. The late rapid development of electrical science
+is due in a large measure to terminology, adopted
+about twenty-five years ago; for it enables a man not
+only to know what he himself is talking about, but also
+to understand others, and that was not the case before.
+A system of units and names for them are matters of
+the first importance. How these were derived need not
+be stated here, but it is needful for every one now to understand
+the significance of the more common of them.
+
+Imagine a wire in front of you with an electrical current
+traversing it from left to right. If it travels in that
+direction it is because the electrical pressure is less
+towards the right than in the opposite direction, just as
+water flowing through a pipe towards the right travels
+thus because gravitative pressure is less in that direction
+than in the other. Gravitative pressure is measured
+in pounds, electrical pressure is measured in \emph{volts}.
+
+If the pressure at the left of the wire were increased
+in any way, there would be an increased current of
+electricity in the wire, just as there would be more water
+go through the pipe if the head or gravitative pressure
+were increased. The rate of water flow might be measured
+as so many cubic inches or cubic feet per second.
+The rate of electrical flow is measured in \emph{ampères}.
+
+If the water pipe were a large one, and the pressure
+the same, more water would flow through it than if it
+were a small pipe of the same length. In like manner
+a thick wire will permit more electricity to flow through
+it with a given electrical pressure than a thin one. The
+water pipe is said to oppose friction to the movement
+of water.
+\DPPageSep{200.png}{188}%
+
+A conductor of electricity is said to offer resistance
+to the flow of electricity. No name has been given to
+any unit of frictional resistance, but electrical resistance
+is measured in \emph{ohms}.
+
+A definite quantity of water flowing at a given rate
+will be emptied from the pipe in a second or a minute.
+So will a definite quantity of electricity go through
+the wire in a second or a minute. The quantity of
+water thus flowing would be measured as so many cubic
+feet, or so many gallons; the quantity of electricity is
+measured in \emph{coulombs}, a coulomb being an ampère per
+second. Where the rate of flow of an electrical current
+is given in ampères, the quantity will be found by
+multiplying the ampères by the number of seconds the
+flow has continued. Thus a ten ampère current in an
+hour will have conveyed $10 × 60 × 60 = 36000$ coulombs.
+
+There are also measures of capacity. The cubic inch,
+the cubic foot, the pint, quart, bushel, and so on, are
+measures of volume or capacity: any of them may be
+adopted as a unit, and when accuracy is required all are
+reducible to the cubic inch as a standard. Thus in a
+gallon there are $231$~cubic inches.
+
+In electricity the unit of capacity is called a \emph{farad},
+and it represents the capability of an electrical device
+to receive and hold a definite amount of electricity
+under the standard conditions of pressure. Thus, when
+under a pressure of one volt it holds one coulomb, the
+capacity of the apparatus is said to be one farad.
+Actually a piece of apparatus of sufficient size to hold
+that quantity has to be so enormously large that a much
+smaller one was requisite for convenience, and consequently
+\DPPageSep{201.png}{189}%
+\index{Potential, electrical}%
+the microfarad, or the one-millionth of the farad,
+has been more generally adopted.
+
+As work may be got out of a flow of water, the
+amount of work depending upon the pressure and the
+rate of flow, so may work be got from an electric current,
+the amount depending upon the pressure, volts,
+and the current, ampères. The product of these factors,
+volts into ampères, is called \emph{watts}; and the mechanical
+value of one watt is such that $746$~is equal to
+a horse-power, which, as before stated, is $550$~foot
+pounds per second. The working power of a watt is
+therefore $\dfrac{550}{746} = .735$ of a foot pound per second.
+
+
+\Section{OHM'S LAW.}
+\index{Ohm's law}%
+
+%[** PP: Putting upright variables in math mode]
+This is simply that the current in an electric circuit
+may be determined by dividing the electric pressure in
+volts by the resistance in ohms. It is customary to use
+symbols for each of these factors, $E$~or E.M.F. (electro-motive
+force) for the pressure in volts, $R$~for the resistance
+in ohms, and $C$~for the current in ampères, so Ohm's
+Law when thus written reads $\dfrac{E}{R} = C$. Recurring to the
+idea of a wire in front carrying a current of electricity
+from the left to the right, and also the statement that
+the electrical pressure is greatest at the left as the
+cause of the current towards the right, it is well to
+remark here that the electrical pressure at any particular
+point in a circuit is sometimes spoken of as its
+potential. If the potential at some other point in the
+circuit be different from the first, the current will flow
+\DPPageSep{202.png}{190}%
+\index{Conductivity, electrical}%
+from the higher towards the lower. The difference of
+potentials may be measured in volts, and expressed as~$E$
+in Ohm's Law.
+
+There is a very wide difference among different substances
+in their ability to transmit electricity. Some
+transmit it freely, and are called good conductors; others
+transmit it but slowly, and such are called poor conductors.
+All solids, and liquids possess some degree of
+conductivity; but some of them, such as glass, rubber,
+and wax, are so poor in conductivity as to be called non-conductors.
+The term non-conductor came into use
+before the refined methods now in use for measuring
+conductivity were known. It is now believed that
+the only non-conductor of electricity is the ether. If
+this be the case, then it appears that all the so-called
+electrical phenomena in the ether are to be looked upon
+rather as the results of electrified matter upon the
+ether, than the presence of electricity in the ether, just
+as radiations or ether waves are the results of actual
+vibrations of atoms and molecules. Conduction, then,
+is a general property of matter, and differs in degrees,
+that difference depending upon both the kind of element
+considered and its molecular combination. Thus,
+copper is an excellent conductor; but if copper be
+chemically combined with sulphur or with oxygen its
+conductivity is greatly impaired.
+
+Conduction, too, implies contact, physical contact,
+as in the case of heat; hence solids and liquids may
+continuously conduct electricity, while gases can conduct
+no faster than their individual molecules can move
+in their free-path motions, and the rate of electrical
+\DPPageSep{203.png}{191}%
+\index{Ether, a non-conductor}%
+loss is so slow from this source, that for telegraph lines
+of hundreds of miles in length it is neglected as being
+of no practical consequence. Neither is moist air
+much better, and for the same reason. In all cases
+where dampness appears to affect the working of electrical
+apparatus, the loss is due to the moisture deposited
+upon the surface of the apparatus, which thus
+forms a thin conductive coating. A Leyden jar may
+retain its charge for months if protected from a coating
+of moisture, which, of course, it could not do if
+either the air or the ether were conductors in any ordinary
+sense of the word.
+
+The words conduction and conductivity represent the
+property possessed by matter to become electrified by
+mere contact with another body that is electrified; but
+the terms do not have a very high scientific importance
+now, for a much more convenient term is employed in
+place, the term resistance, which is the reciprocal of
+conductivity, that is, the greater the one the less the
+other proportionally. The substance having the highest
+degree of conductivity has the smallest degree of
+resistance. Resistance is measured in ohms, and is of
+two sorts; viz., specific and dimensional. Specific resistance
+is that resistance which depends altogether
+upon the nature of the particular element considered,
+and may be determined for any element by measuring
+the resistance of a cubic centimetre of it.
+
+Tables of conductivity and of resistance of wires
+are common, and the following one gives the relative
+values of a few of the elements for comparison. The
+standard of conductivity being silver and reckoned as~$100$.
+\DPPageSep{204.png}{192}%
+\index{Conductivity, electrical}%
+\index{Resistance, electrical}%
+The standard of resistance being a column of
+mercury $106$~centimetres long and one millimetre
+square, which has a resistance of one ohm. The numbers
+given are the resistances in ohms and fractions of
+a wire $1$~metre long ($39.37$~inches) and one millimetre
+($\frac{1}{\DPtypo{15.4}{25.4}}$~of an inch) in diameter.
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{l<{\qquad}>{\qquad}r@{}l<{\qquad}>{\qquad}r@{}l}
+\scriptsize\llap{SU}BSTANCE. &
+ \multicolumn{2}{c}{\scriptsize\llap{CONDU}CTI\rlap{VITY.}} &
+ \multicolumn{2}{c}{\scriptsize\llap{RE}SISTA\rlap{NCE.}}
+\\
+Silver, & $100$& & &$.021$
+\\
+Copper, & $99.$&$9$ & &$.021$
+\\
+Gold, & $80.$& & &$.027$
+\\
+Aluminium, & $56.$& & &$.037$
+\\
+Zinc, & $30.$& & &$.072$
+\\
+Platinum & $18.$& & &$.116$
+\\
+Iron, & $17.$& & &$.125$
+\\
+Lead, & $8.$&$5$ & &$.252$
+\\
+German Silver,& $8.$& & &$.267$
+\\
+Hard Carbon, & $1.$& & $50$&$.00$
+\\
+Graphite & $0.$&$01$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Very variable.}
+\\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The resistance of most liquids, and of such substances
+as are used for insulating wires, is so very great
+that they are given in units called megohms, each a
+million ohms. The following represents the resistance
+of a few bodies in such terms, the volume being one
+cubic centimetre:---
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{l<{\qquad\qquad}r}
+\qquad\scriptsize SUBSTANCE. & \scriptsize\llap{RESISTANCE} IN \rlap{MEGOHMS.}
+\\
+Ice, & $284.$
+\\
+Water at freezing-point,& $150.$
+\\
+Mica, & $84.$
+\\
+Gutta Percha, & $450.$
+\\
+Hard Rubber, & $28,000.$
+\\
+Paraffine, & $34,000.$
+\\
+Glass, & $3,000,000.$
+\\
+Air, & Infinite.
+\\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+\DPPageSep{205.png}{193}%
+These must be read as so many millions of ohms.
+Thus, ice\DPnote{** [sic], no verb} $284$ millions. Thus can be seen within what
+wide limits this electrical property of matter ranges,
+and also its significance as a factor in Ohm's Law, and
+why some substances can be practically used as insulators
+when in reality they possess a certain degree of
+conductivity. Thus, glass is called an insulator. But
+if there were a difference of potential or pressure on
+opposite sides of a piece of glass one centimetre thick,
+equal to $3,000000$ of millions of volts, there would be
+a current of one ampère passing through for
+\[
+\frac{3,000000,000000}{3,000000,000000} = 1
+\]
+In no artificial way can we produce such a voltage as
+that; but it is the opinion of some physicists that the
+voltage of lightning may rise as high as some thousands
+of millions. Under ordinary commercial voltages of
+only a few thousands, the current would be insignificant.
+Suppose it were $50,000$ volts, then
+\[
+\frac{50,000}{3,000000,000000} = \frac{5}{300,000000} = \frac{1}{60,000000}
+\]
+of an ampère.
+
+Dimensional resistance is of more practical importance,
+for by making a conductor larger its resistance
+becomes less. When the cross section of a wire is doubled,
+the resistance is reduced one-half. When the
+diameter of it is doubled, it is reduced to one-fourth,---a
+relation which may be stated as follows: The resistance
+of a conductor varies inversely as its cross section,
+or the square of its diameter if it be a wire; so by
+making a relatively poor conductor large enough, it may
+\DPPageSep{206.png}{194}%
+\index{Electricity, activity}%
+transfer as large a current as a much better specific
+conductor of smaller dimensions. In the table it is
+shown that the resistance of copper to that of iron is as
+$.021$ to~$.125$, or that the latter is six times the former.
+If, then, the section of the iron wire be made six
+times larger, it will have the same degree of conductivity
+as the copper. This means that one pound of
+copper is worth nearly six pounds of iron for electrical
+conduction; and whether the one or the other should
+be employed in a given place depends chiefly upon the
+relative costs. It is a commercial rather than an electrical
+question. The resistance of all conductors varies
+with their length.
+
+Temperature also affects the conductivity of nearly
+all bodies. Some have their conductivity increased
+by heat, as is the case with carbon; others have their
+conductivity increased by cold. Thus, the conductivity
+of copper at $100°$~below zero is increased nearly ten
+times.
+
+An idea of the relative magnitude of the factor of
+resistance in common electrical work may be gained by
+knowing that a mile of ordinary electric arc-light wire
+generally has a resistance of about two ohms; telegraph
+and telephone wires five or six ohms, and often
+more, per mile. If there be a current of ten ampères
+going through a mile of wire that has a resistance of
+one ohm, then Ohm's Law enables one to determine
+what is the difference in pressure between the ends;
+for $\dfrac{E}{R} = C$ and $E = RC = 1 × 10 = 10\text{ volts}$. So if any
+two of these factors be known, the other may be computed.
+\DPPageSep{207.png}{195}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+The $E$~gives the available electrical pressure;
+the $R$~gives the conditions under which it can work,
+and the $C$~gives their resultant, the available current,
+while the product of~$EC$ gives the activity, or rate at
+which energy is expended in the circuit, while if this
+product be divided by~$746$, the horse-power of the circuit
+will be given.
+
+The further significance of Ohm's Law and its utility
+will be given farther on, when considering the relation
+of electrical energy to mechanical energy.
+
+
+\Section{INDUCTION.}
+
+It has been pointed out that the term conduction
+signifies the transferrence\DPnote{** [sic]} of electricity from one body
+to another by contact,---contact in the sense that the
+molecules of solids and liquids are in contact when they
+cohere, and when their individual vibrations cannot take
+place without mutual interference. It is found that
+bodies become electrified by merely being in the presence
+of another body that is electrified, without material
+contact, and the more perfect the vacuum between
+the bodies the more freely does this phenomenon take
+place. As the electrified body that thus affects other
+bodies in its neighborhood does not lose any of its own
+electricity, does not share it with other bodies in any
+degree, and as the other bodies lose their electrification
+by simply being removed to a distance, and will recover
+it again by being brought back, it follows that the
+action is entirely distinct from the phenomenon of electrical
+conduction. A similar body electrified by conduction
+will retain its condition, and distance will make
+\DPPageSep{208.png}{196}%
+\index{Electrical field}%
+\index{Fields, electrical}%
+no difference. This kind of action is called \emph{electrical
+induction}. To understand what changes take place, it
+will be needful to attend particularly to the factors
+present. Under the head of Electrical Origin of Electricity, %[xref]
+it is pointed out that an electrical current may
+be induced in a circuit adjacent to another circuit in
+which a current is produced in any way; and here are
+similar conditions and similar phenomena. Imagine an
+electrified body freely suspended in the air. If a gold-leaf
+electroscope is brought within a few feet of it, its
+leaves will diverge; if brought nearer they will diverge
+still more; recession will cause them to collapse. This
+movement of the leaves can be produced indefinitely by
+changing the distance of the electrometer from the
+electrified body. It is important to note here that it
+requires the expenditure of energy to move the gold
+leaves, though the amount may be small. If it may be
+done for an indefinite number of times, then the energy
+spent may be indefinitely great; and that it is not
+directly derived from the electrified body itself is certain;
+for the latter loses by the process none of its electricity,
+and cannot lose it except by conduction. Evidently
+the body has in some way modified the physical
+condition of the space about it so that another body
+within that space is affected somewhat as it would be if
+touched by an electrified body. But the property belongs
+to the space itself, and cannot be extracted from it
+so long as the electrified body remains in place. This
+space about an electrified body within which other bodies
+assume an electrical condition is called an \emph{electrical
+field}. It may extend to an indefinite distance
+\DPPageSep{209.png}{197}%
+\index{Electrical stress}%
+\index{Stress, electrical}%
+from it, and its strength has been found to vary like
+gravity, being inversely as the square of the distance.
+This new physical condition into which the space has
+been brought by the electrified body is known to be the
+effect of the latter upon the ether, and is called its electrical
+\emph{stress}. It is simply the reaction of the one upon
+the other, and indicates that the molecules stand in
+abnormal strained positions. A mechanical idea of
+what it is like may be got by pressing the hand upon
+the top of a table, and then producing a twisting strain
+tending to turn the table round, but without moving it.
+The whole table will be subject to a stress that will react
+upon the hand, a condition which will, of course, be
+retained by the table as long as such pressure is kept
+upon it. For the hand substitute an electrified mass of
+matter, and for the table the ether in any direction
+about it, and one will have a fair conception of the
+electrical field. Especially so, if he will add to it that
+such twisting effect can be either right-handed or left-handed,
+and so produce those distinctions known as positive
+and negative, which run all through electrical
+phenomena.
+
+A body brought into this distorted field of ether is
+acted upon by the latter tending to twist its molecules
+into new positions with reference to each other, which
+is precisely the condition that brought about the original
+stress, that is to say the electrical one, with this
+difference, that if the original one was right-handed
+the reaction of the ether would be left-handed, or
+exactly opposite that of the inducing body. This is
+simply because action and reaction are equal to each
+other and \emph{opposite}.
+\DPPageSep{210.png}{198}%
+\index{Electrical waves}%
+
+One can now understand how it can be that bodies
+can be electrified by induction without loss of electrification
+by the inducing body. There are three steps in
+the process. 1st,~The body electrified in any known
+manner. 2d,~Its resultant stress in the ether. 3d,~The
+reaction of the ether upon the second body,
+inductively electrifying it. Electricity has not been
+conducted by the ether, but a stress has been, and
+the ether stress has electrified the second body. By
+periodically electrifying and delectrifying a body, a
+series of stresses will be produced about it which will
+travel outwards as a succession of waves, the velocity
+of which is the same as that of light, $186,000$ miles
+per second, and the wave length of which will depend
+upon the number of electrifications per second. Suppose
+a sphere, like a cannon-ball in free space, to be
+connected by wire, so that by pressing a Morse telegraph
+key in connection with any source of electricity
+it could be charged and discharged at will. If the key
+was closed regularly once a second, the wave produced
+would be $186,000$ miles long. If it could be
+closed $186,000$ times per second, the wave would be
+one mile long. And if it could be closed so often that
+the wave length should be but the one fifty-thousandth
+of an inch, there is every reason to believe that the
+eye would perceive the waves as light; not so much
+because the waves were produced by electrical means,
+as that the eye is capable of perceiving ether waves of
+that length, no matter how they may originate.
+
+The analogy between heat and electrical phenomena
+in the ether is very close. The ether receives the
+\DPPageSep{211.png}{199}%
+energy from both sources and transforms it. The
+ether is not a conductor of either heat or electricity:
+it is neither heated nor electrified by them, but in each
+case is simply a medium for the distribution of such
+energy as gets into it according to its own laws, and
+quite independent of its source. When heat gives up
+its energy to ether it becomes ether waves or radiant
+energy, and is no longer heat: it has been transformed.
+When radiant energy falls upon other matter it is
+again transformed into heat. In like manner, when
+electricity gives up its energy to the ether, it becomes
+radiant energy also, and when this falls upon other
+matter it is again transformed into electricity. I have
+been thus particular to enlarge upon induction, and
+point out the factors present, in order to make it clear
+how entirely distinct the electrical condition in matter
+is from the electrical effect of it upon the ether. It is
+from a failure to keep these distinctions in mind that
+so many have been mystified by electrical phenomena,
+and so many different theories have been propounded
+as to its nature.
+
+In all our experience electricity originates in matter,
+and whatever the particular character of the phenomenon
+\emph{in matter}, it ought to have a different and distinct
+name from the effect of such phenomenon upon the
+ether. If such endowment of matter be called electricity,
+then it is not proper to use the same word for
+its stress, or wave effect, in the ether, and this for
+precisely the same reason as is allowed to hold good in
+heat phenomena. Formerly ether waves were called
+heat, afterwards heat waves, now radiant energy, for it
+is known that there is no heat in the ether.
+\DPPageSep{212.png}{200}%
+
+
+\Section{EFFECTS OF AN ELECTRICAL CURRENT---1. MAGNETISM.}
+
+If a wire through which a current of electricity is
+passing be twisted into a loop or ring, it is found that
+the loop acts in all ways like a magnet. Its sides have
+polarity; and if it be so mounted as to be free to
+assume any direction, it will move so its sides face the
+north and south. If a piece of iron be placed in the
+ring, the magnetic effect will be greatly strengthened.
+Soft iron, however, loses its magnetic property as soon
+as the current stops. A piece of steel will retain some
+portion of the magnetic condition, and so is called a
+permanent magnet. A given current of electricity
+will make a much stronger magnet of a piece of soft
+iron than it will of a piece of steel, and this is explained
+by saying that the iron is more \emph{permeable} to
+magnetism than steel is. Once in possession of a
+magnet, one may proceed to study its physical properties
+in many ways. That a magnet possesses poles;
+that it can attract and hold to itself iron, steel, nickel,
+cobalt, and affects other substances but slightly; that
+it is attractive to unlike poles of other magnets, and
+repulsive to similar poles,---and so on, are phenomena
+so widely known that they need not be described here.
+Only such phenomena will be considered as will be
+helpful to an understanding of the constitution of a
+magnet, and its relation to electricity and to the space
+about it.
+
+The magnetism of a magnet seems to reside chiefly
+near its ends, for these will sustain bits of iron, but
+near the middle it will not; and when a small compass-%
+\DPPageSep{213.png}{201}%
+needle is moved around a bar magnet, it points towards
+one end or the other, except when near the middle,
+where it sets itself parallel. When such a bar magnet
+has a sheet of paper laid upon it, and iron filings are
+sprinkled upon the paper, the filings are arranged in
+curious curved lines, starting from one pole and traceable
+to the other, and quite around the magnet on both
+sides. This %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{3.5in}{213a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{20}{Diag.\ 20.---Magnetic Lines.}
+\end{figure}
+arranging power of the magnet extends in
+every direction about it, as one can satisfy himself by
+trying the same experiment with the magnet turned on
+different sides. If one will compare the direction of
+these lines of filings with the positions of the needle,
+he will see that the needle assumes the same direction
+at any given place. Near the poles the lines all converge
+to it, and opposite the middle the lines are parallel
+with the magnet. If the magnet be of a U~or
+horse-shoe form, the lines will be found still to extend
+from one pole to the other, some straight, some curved
+\DPPageSep{214.png}{202}%
+\index{Fields, magnetic}%
+outwards, but always forming a curve such as to touch
+each pole of the magnet. While the filings are in the
+position described, let the paper be gently tapped with
+a pencil so as to jostle them slightly, and they will
+begin to close up in such a way as always to shorten
+themselves, and presently they will form a dense mass
+between the poles, adhering to the latter as a solid
+piece of iron would do.
+
+Such phenomena show that the magnet in some way
+reacts upon the space about it, so that iron and other
+magnets there are affected, just as an electrified body
+affects the space about it, as has been described. This
+space about a magnet within which such effects are
+produced is called the \emph{Magnetic field}, which may be
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+said to be the stress in the ether produced by a
+magnet. Like the electric stress, it extends to an
+indefinite distance from the magnet, and travels with
+the velocity of light; so if a magnet was charged and
+discharged once a second, a wave motion would be set
+up: the wave length would be $186,000$ miles long, and
+if it could be charged and discharged so fast that the
+waves were but the one fifty-thousandth of an inch in
+length, it is very probable they would be perceived as
+rays of light, and the magnet would be a luminous
+body. Such waves are called electro-magnetic waves.
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+At present the shortest waves of this sort, that can be
+artificially produced, are several inches long, but it
+seems highly probable that before long some way will
+be discovered of making them of the required length
+for vision.
+
+If a test-tube filled with iron filings be held near a
+\DPPageSep{215.png}{203}%
+delicate suspended magnetic needle it will be found to
+give no indication of polarity, one part will act just
+like any other part, and the magnet will be equally
+attracted. Bring the test-tube against the poles of a
+strong magnet for a few seconds, and then it will be
+shown that the filings have become magnetic, and now
+one end of the tube will attract one pole of the needle,
+while the other end will repel the same end. Shake
+up the filings well, and the polarity will be destroyed.
+
+Stir up iron filings with melted wax, and pour into a
+paper mould, so as to form a stick the size of the finger,
+or larger. If this be tested for magnetism, it will be
+found without any; but magnetize it as if it were a
+piece of steel, and it will be found to retain it, becoming
+a permanent magnet. If a layer of iron be electrically
+deposited upon a brass wire in a magnetic field,
+the wire acts like a magnet. All these phenomena go
+to show that what is called polarity or magnetism is
+due to the \emph{positions of the molecules}, rather than upon
+some sudden endowment which the molecules receive
+and may lose. Imagine every molecule of iron to be
+a magnet, having its poles or faces, then if in a mass
+of them, such as makes up a piece of iron or steel,
+all be made to face one way and keep such position, all
+will act in conjunction to give polarity to the mass.
+When some molecules face one way, and others adjacent
+to them face the opposite way, they will but
+neutralize each other, so the external evidence of
+magnetism will be destroyed. How atoms may be
+magnets and exhibit polarity may be imagined by considering
+the phenomena of vortex rings again. In the
+\DPPageSep{216.png}{204}%
+ring all the motion on one side is towards the middle
+of the ring inwards, on the other side all the motion is
+outwards, so the properties of the two sides are opposite.
+Each such ring must have its own \emph{field}, which
+may extend to an indefinite distance from it, and may
+be represented roughly by the diagram in which the
+curved lines show the same features before described
+as belonging to a magnetic field. When two or more
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+are facing the same way, and are in contact, these lines
+cannot re-enter the ring except by going round the
+second one; and when many are in line they must go
+round them all, in which case the %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \begin{minipage}[b]{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{216a}
+ \Caption{21}{Diag.\ 21.---Field of a Ring.}
+ \end{minipage}
+%
+ \begin{minipage}[b]{1.5in}
+ \raisebox{12pt}{\Graphic{1.5in}{216b}}
+ \Caption{22}{Diag.\ 22.---Coinciding Fields.}
+ \end{minipage}
+%
+ \begin{minipage}[b]{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{216c}
+ \Caption{23}{Diag.\ 23.---Opposing Fields.}
+ \end{minipage}
+ \end{center}
+\end{figure}
+direction of the lines
+will be precisely those observed about a straight bar
+magnet.
+\Pagelabel{105} %[** PP: Label to p. 105 seems to point here]
+
+When they all face one way, as in diagram~22, the
+resultant will be at~A, the sum of the outgoing movements,
+and at~B, the sum of the ingoing ones, and
+polarity at A and~B will be at a maximum. If they face
+in different ways, each will tend to cancel the other,
+and there will be no external field; as in diagram~23.
+\DPPageSep{217.png}{205}%
+\index{Ether pressure}%
+
+If two such atoms be brought face to face, each will
+be blowing against the other; their fields overlap, and
+the stress is increased between them, and they are
+crowded away from each other,---a phenomenon called
+repulsion. The opposite condition obtains when they
+face the same way and are near together, with the
+result that the stress is lessened between them, and
+they are pushed together by it; and this is called
+attraction.
+
+There has been growing the conviction for a long
+time that the atoms of all substances are magnetic; but
+\Pagelabel{205}%
+when they combine into molecular groups they are
+turned about so their magnetic fields neutralize each
+other, and thus it happens that most molecular compounds
+show no polarity. But every substance whatever
+is attracted by a magnet, and will move up to it if
+the magnet be a strong one. Brass, lead, stones, oats,
+corn, and wood will all be affected alike by a strong
+magnetic field, being pushed towards the magnet in the
+same way as iron, though not in the same degree. The
+pressure of iron against a magnet, due to the magnetic
+field, may be as great as a thousand pounds per
+square inch.
+
+When a piece of iron is brought near to a magnet,
+and it becomes a magnet by induction instead of by
+contact, it is to be understood that its molecules are
+rotated into similar positions by the action of the
+magnetic field upon it, not that magnetism has gone
+from the magnet to the iron; and when it requires a
+pull, and therefore work, to move a piece of iron away
+from a magnet, it is against the ether the work is done.
+\DPPageSep{218.png}{206}%
+
+It was stated at the outset that a loop of iron through
+which an electric current is passing is a magnet, and
+previous to that it was pointed out that an electric %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.75in}
+ \Graphic{1.75in}{218a}
+ \Caption{24}{Diag.\ 24---Iron Filings about Electric Current.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+current in a wire has a field
+that extends indefinitely out
+from it. If such a wire be
+dipped in iron filings, they
+form rings round it, showing
+that the polarity is at right
+angles to the wire. Now, if the wire with the iron
+filings clinging about it be made into a loop, it will
+be seen at once how the polarity of the different
+segments is all in one direction inside the ring, and
+opposite to that on the outside the ring, and the
+structure will be a forcible reminder of a vortex ring.
+If several similar turns be taken in the wire, and they
+all be brought near together so as to form a helix, it
+will also be seen that these conspire together to set a
+boundary to the field on the inside, but allow indefinite
+expansion to it outside; so if one should draw the lines
+for it as iron filings would be arranged by it, he will
+have the precise lines of a magnet, while the ring
+structure will be, on a large scale, just
+what was described on an atomic scale
+as constituting a vortex ring magnet;
+and the only thing lacking to complete
+the analogy is the conception of a rotary
+motion in the wire at right angles to its length.
+
+%[Illustration][** PP: Moved down to avoid LaTeX warning]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.25in}
+ \hfil\Graphic{1in}{218b}\hfil
+ \Caption{25}{Diag.\ 25.---Adjacent Turns.}
+\end{wrapfigure}It has been found that when a current has been
+started in a conductor, a torsional impulse is given to
+the latter in such a sense that if one looks along it in
+\DPPageSep{219.png}{207}%
+the direction of the current the twist is in the direction
+of the hands of a clock. So there is direct confirmatory
+experiment showing that the nature of the motion in
+an electric circuit is rotary in such a way that the
+whole circuit may be considered as a vortex ring; and
+as it is the matter of the conductor that is thus rotated,
+it follows that electrical current motion is rotary, as
+heat motion is vibratory.
+
+Allusion has been made to the opinion now current that
+ether waves or light are electro-magnetic phenomena.
+\index{Ether waves, their source}%
+\index{Light waves}%
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+How this can be may be understood by considering a
+magnet of any form, with its surrounding field. If the
+form of the magnet be changed, the shape of the field
+will be correspondingly changed; and as this extends
+out indefinitely into space, it follows that a succession
+of changes of form would set up waves through the
+whole of that space. Now, a magnet is an elastic body,
+and if it be struck it will vibrate and produce a sound.
+The vibration implies a change of form, and that in
+turn a set of waves radiated into space. As the field is
+an ether field, the waves will be ether waves. Now
+assume that atoms are themselves elastic magnets, each
+with a field indefinitely extended, and it follows that
+the vibrations produced by impact, or in any other
+manner, will set up corresponding waves in the ether,
+the wave length depending upon the vibratory rate of
+the atoms. Thus ordinary radiant energy, or light,
+would consist of undulations in a magnetic field.
+
+Of course it will be perceived that vibrations of any
+electro-magnetic body, large or small, would induce
+similar waves, differing only in wave length, so there
+\DPPageSep{220.png}{208}%
+\index{Magnetic induction}%
+would be in the ether wave lengths of all dimensions,
+\Pagelabel{208}%
+from the shortest possible to those millions of miles
+long. It is now an important physical problem how to
+produce such that shall be of the dimensions capable of
+affecting the eye.
+
+\Subsection{Induction Coils.}
+\index{Induction coils}%
+
+One or more loops of iron, through which a current
+of electricity is flowing, is an electro magnet. When
+iron is placed in the loop, it condenses the magnetic
+field, and it may be made as much as thirty times
+stronger than it would be without the iron. When a
+magnetic field is produced inside a loop of wire, the
+reverse effect %[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+%[Illustration]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.75in}
+ \Graphic{1.75in}{220a}
+ \Caption{26}{Diag.\ 26.---Electro-Magnetic Induction.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+happens, and a
+current is generated in the
+opposite direction. Suppose
+a short rod of iron to have a
+single turn of wire at each
+end about it, one of them,
+as~A, to be so connected to a source of electricity
+that a current through it may be produced by closing a
+key, the other one to be a closed circuit, as shown. If
+a current be established through~A in one direction, a
+current will be induced in~B, as indicated by the arrow.
+There will be in the loop of the A~circuit a certain
+electro-motive force,~$E$. A nearly equal electro-motive
+force will be induced in loop~B. If there were two
+loops at~B instead of one, the electro-motive force would
+be twice that in~A, and for $n$~turns it would be $n$~times.
+The current in~B will depend upon the resistance in its
+circuit; that is, it will be $\dfrac{E}{R}=C$, according to Ohm's
+\DPPageSep{221.png}{209}%
+Law. The size of the wire in B~circuit will not make
+any difference in the value of~$E$ in it. That value will
+depend only upon the magnetism of the bar, and the
+magnetism in the bar will be measured by the product
+of the current into the number of turns of wire in
+the circuit~A. And this product is called the \emph{ampère
+turns}. The ampère turns will be nearly equal in the
+\index{Ampère turns}%
+two circuits. This process of obtaining electrical
+currents in a second circuit by two transformations is
+of great use in the electrical industries, and the device
+is called an induction coil or transformer. The charging
+circuit is called the primary, and the discharging
+one the secondary. By making circuit~A of a small
+number of turns of thick wire, so as to allow strong
+currents in it, and having circuit~B consist of a great
+number of turns, the electro-motive force may be
+raised almost indefinitely. Suppose there be $100$~turns
+in the \textit{A}~circuit,\DPnote{[** Italicized in orig, not sure why]} and a hundred thousand in the \textit{B}~circuit,
+then for every volt in the A~circuit there may be
+nearly a thousand volts in the B~circuit; and this is the
+construction in those instruments known as induction
+coils, with which so called jumping sparks are produced,
+and represent sometimes a million or more volts. On
+the other hand, it is sometimes desirable to change a
+high electro-motive force to a lower one; and this may
+be done by reversing the connections and making the
+primary current go through a great number of turns,
+and taking the induced current from the smaller number
+of turns in the other circuit. Definite reduction in
+either way may be effected by making the ratio of the
+number of turns in the two circuits the reduction
+\DPPageSep{222.png}{210}%
+\index{Electro-magnets}%
+\index{Welding, electric}%
+wanted. That is to say, if there are $100$~volts in
+the primary circuit, and only ten are wanted, make the
+secondary of one-tenth the number of turns in the primary.
+If a thousand volts are wanted, make the secondary
+with ten times the number of turns in the primary.
+It should be remembered, also, that two turns of wire in~B
+have twice the resistance of one turn, and the current
+induced will be reduced to one-half. If there be one
+hundred turns, it will be reduced to one-hundredth and
+so on. Hence, in the large induction coils for high electro-motive
+forces, the current is necessarily a small one,
+while in the transformers in which the reduction is to
+lower values of~$E$ than are in the primary, the current
+may be very great indeed. This is the case in Thompson's
+Welding Apparatus. The secondary has but a
+single turn of heavy copper, while the primary has many
+thousands, and the current in the secondary may be
+thousands of ampères. As the heating effect is proportional
+to the square of the current, it is plain that
+such large currents have enormous heating power.
+
+All such devices require either intermittent or alternating
+currents to operate them, for there is no induced
+current in any circuit when the inducing magnetism is
+not changing. A constant magnetic field induces no
+electrical changes.
+
+
+\Subsection{The Electro Magnet.}\DPnote{** [sic] No hyphen}
+
+This is generally considered as consisting of a helix
+of insulated wire about a piece of soft iron, and may be
+either a straight bar, or crooked in any convenient form,
+its function being to produce a magnetic field when a
+\DPPageSep{223.png}{211}%
+current circulates in the wire, and to lose it when the
+current stops. This it does only partially, for all iron
+when once it has been magnetized becomes more or less
+permanently magnetic; hence there is only a difference
+in degree between an electro magnet and a permanent
+magnet. Until within a few years the electro magnet
+had its most extensive field of usefulness in telegraphy.
+It was combined with a piece of soft iron near its poles
+called its armature, which was so mounted that the
+magnetic field made it to move towards the magnet, and
+a retractile spring pulled it away when the field was
+absent. The movement of the armature was employed
+to receive signals. In some cases the movement recorded
+itself, and sometimes its prompt motion produced
+a sound, a succession of these being arranged into a
+telegraphic alphabet.
+
+If one has a good idea of a magnetic field and its
+action upon a piece of iron in it, he will be able to
+understand all the various combinations of forms and
+functions of electro-magnetic devices, however much
+they may apparently be disguised. Thus, the magnetic
+telephone is an electro magnet with an armature
+\index{Telephone}%
+of such size and flexibility as to be capable of much
+quicker movements than ordinary telegraph instrument
+\index{Telegraph}%
+armatures, the whole boxed so as to be convenient
+to hold to the ear. A common telegraph sounder
+acts in precisely the same way, though not so well, for
+the armature is too heavy, and one cannot concentrate
+its effects upon the ear on account of its form. An
+electric bell also produces its ring by having a hammer
+fixed to the armature, so as the latter moves in response
+to the electric field it strikes the bell.
+\DPPageSep{224.png}{212}%
+\index{Motor, electric}%
+
+An electric motor, in the largest sense, consists of a
+device for transforming electric into mechanical motions;
+and the relation sustained between an electro
+magnet, its field and an armature, is such as to do it
+directly. A telegraph sounder is thus a simple motor,
+for the armature moves visibly in response to the electric
+current. If a wire be wound about the armature,
+there is an induced current in it, as in an induction coil,
+and for the same reason; and the movements of the
+armature towards and away from the poles of the electro
+magnet, called sometimes the field magnet, give
+rise to currents in the armature coil. If a current
+from another source is sent through the armature coil,
+it gives polarity to the armature itself, and the reaction
+between it and the poles of the field magnet is still
+stronger, and the mechanical motions are still more
+energetic. The armature thus wound with wire is obviously
+an electro magnet itself, and when it is so
+mounted as to be capable of rotating between the poles
+of a fixed electro magnet, a continuous rotation may
+be kept up.
+
+The current in the fixed magnet is steady, and therefore
+maintains a steady magnetic field. The current
+in the armature magnet is changed in direction by the
+motion of the armature itself, and is effected by a device
+called a commutator. The efficiency of such a
+motor may be as high as $90$\%~or more. That is, for
+every horse-power of electrical energy turned into it, it
+will give back nine-tenths of a horse-power in actual
+work. The small space they occupy for the working
+capacity, when compared with a steam-engine for the
+\DPPageSep{225.png}{213}%
+\index{Efficiency of machines}%
+same work, the small amount of attention they require,
+and their freedom from the dirt inseparable from an
+engine, commend the electric motor as a substitute
+for the engine in most places where power is wanted
+and an electric current can be had; for it is to be
+remembered that fifty horse-power can travel through
+a wire that can go through a gimlet-hole, while a steam-plant
+for the same work would require a large boiler
+and engine as well as a big chimney.
+
+When the armature of a motor is made to turn by
+mechanical means, the shifting positions in the magnetic
+field develop electric currents in its coils. Such
+an armature cannot be turned as freely when the field
+magnet has a current in it as it can when it has not,
+and the energy spent in making it turn appears as a
+current. The device is called a dynamo, which may be
+\index{Dynamo}%
+said to be a machine for transforming mechanical motion
+into electrical motion. The steps are mechanical
+motion, magnetic field, electrical current; while in the
+motor they are simply the reverse,---electric current,
+magnetic field, mechanical motion.
+
+The efficiency of a dynamo is very high indeed. It
+can transform~$95$\% of the power applied to it into
+electrical power, and in this particular it is one of the
+most perfect machines in existence. There is absolutely
+no room for any important improvement in the
+dynamo as regards its efficiency. A good steam-engine
+may transform ten to fifteen per cent of the energy
+turned into it. A windmill may give fifty, a turbine
+water-wheel ninety, but when a dynamo gives ninety-five,
+it shows that the coming man has a margin of but
+five per cent for improvement in its efficiency.
+\DPPageSep{226.png}{214}%
+\index{Energy. What determines transfer}%
+\index{Fields, magnetic}%
+\index{Lighting, electric}%
+\index{Resistance, electrical}%
+
+Thus the magnetic field, which is simply the ether in
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+an abnormal condition of stress, is the common agency
+between mechanical motions and electrical phenomena,
+and transfers energy one way or the other. All that
+determines whether it shall be one way or the other is
+simply which side has the excess of energy; for energy
+of a particular sort always goes from the body having
+more to one having less. Which side has the excess
+is determined solely by the mechanical conditions
+present.
+
+
+\Subsection{Electric Lighting.}
+
+An electric current always heats the conductor
+through which it is passing. The amount of heat depends
+upon the strength of the current, and varies as
+the square of it. In a given circuit with a uniform current,
+the current has the same value, and therefore the
+same heating power, in every part of that circuit; but
+the temperature to which a body will be raised by a
+given current depends upon its own constitution, its
+size and electrical resistance. Connect together three
+wires of copper, iron, and platinum, each a foot long,
+and of the same diameter, and make them a part of the
+same circuit, so that the same current shall flow through
+them. If the current be increased gradually, the iron
+wire will grow appreciably warm, more current will
+make it hot; platinum wire will be only warm;
+while the copper wire will not have its temperature
+much changed. Still more current will make the iron
+red-hot, the platinum uncomfortably hot, and warm
+appreciably the copper; and more current will fuse the
+\DPPageSep{227.png}{215}%
+\index{Electric lamps}%
+iron, perhaps make the platinum red-hot, but the copper
+may not yet be uncomfortably hot. This heating
+effect in a given wire is found to be proportional to its
+resistance: the iron wire having the greater resistance
+is most heated, and the copper having least, is least
+heated; hence to obtain a high temperature with a
+given current, a conductor must be chosen that has a
+relatively high resistance. Resistance, however, varies
+with the cross section inversely, so a small wire must
+be taken if the temperature of incandescence is to be
+reached with a small current; and a current that will
+raise half an inch of a wire to a white heat will raise a
+mile, or any other length of the same wire, to the same
+temperature; but the longer a wire is, the higher must
+be the electro-motive force in order to get the same
+current. For a given length of a wire the electrical
+energy spent in it will be found by multiplying its resistance
+by the square of the current,~\DPtypo{$RC,^2$}{$RC^2$,} which will
+give the products in watts, of which $746$~equal a horsepower.
+Metals are liable to fuse and become useless,
+so that wires of carbon, made by heating organic fibres
+in the absence of air, as in making charcoal, are substituted
+for metals. They fuse only at extremely high
+temperatures; and being enclosed in a vacuum in bulbs
+of glass they cannot burn up as carbon does when exposed
+to the air when red-hot. This is the electric incandescent
+lamp. Most of them are so prepared that a
+current of about three-fourths of an ampère is required
+to properly light them, and this will be got when the difference
+of potentials between the lamp terminals is kept
+at a certain figure, so that lamps are specified by the
+\DPPageSep{228.png}{216}%
+number of volts they require, rather than the current;
+thus there are $50$~volt lamps, $110$~volt lamps, and so on.
+Now, such lamps take ordinarily about four watts for a
+candle, so a twenty candle-power lamp requires eighty
+watts, and that means $\dfrac{746}{80}=9.3$ such lamps to the
+horse-power. Such lamps may last for a thousand or
+more hours. If a stronger current be used, they shine
+brighter, but their life is shortened. There is a process
+of slow disintegration going on in these lamps
+all the time. The surface molecules slowly evaporate
+under the vigorous vibratory movements present, and
+the carbon vapor thus formed sticks to the inside surface
+of the bulbs, giving them the familiar blackened
+appearance.
+
+
+\Subsection{The Arc Light.}
+\index{Arc light}%
+
+If an electro-motive force of forty or more volts be
+maintained in a circuit, and the circuit be broken at
+some place and the ends separated a small fraction of
+an inch, the current does not cease, and is maintained
+between the ends by what is termed an arc, where the
+temperature is so very great that almost all substances
+are reduced to vapor at once. All metals are fused and
+dissipated there. Carbon does not fuse there, but is
+slowly burnt up. The ends of the carbon reach a temperature
+higher than can be reached in any other
+known way, and the light they then give out is called
+the arc light. The rate of expenditure of energy in
+that small space where the brightness is, is generally
+some less than a horse-power. The current employed
+\DPPageSep{229.png}{217}%
+\index{Mars, signalling to}%
+is about nine and a half ampères, and the electro-motive
+force about forty-five volts; hence $9.5 × 45 = 427.5$
+watts, and such a lamp may be equal to $800$~candles,
+though they are generally rated as $2,000$ candle-power.
+
+By increasing the current the brightness increases,
+and there is no especial limit to the amount of light
+that may in this way be produced. With parabolic reflectors
+the light may be concentrated into a powerful
+beam. The inhabitants of Mars could see such a one,
+and it could be used for signalling between the two
+planets if the Martians had a similar one.
+
+Seeing that the temperature to which a given conductor
+can be raised by a current is determinate, one
+can arrange for heating on any scale. There is no
+other reason than the relative cost of electric heating
+compared with the ordinary method with fuels, why it
+should not be in common use to-day. In most places
+the dynamo for the production of the current would be
+run by a steam-engine, requiring in its turn a furnace;
+and it is cheaper to use the fuel direct for heating, than
+to transform the energy so many times, each time with
+some loss. A common furnace is much more economical
+of energy than a steam-engine. But if ever electricity
+is obtained directly from combustion in an economical
+way, as there is some reason for thinking possible,
+electrical heaters will displace stoves and the common
+furnaces in the house. So the same current that
+lights the house will serve for cooking and warmth.
+\DPPageSep{230.png}{218}%
+\index{Water decomposition}%
+
+
+\Section{2. CHEMICAL EFFECTS.}
+\index{Chemical effects}%
+
+When a current of electricity is passed through
+conducting liquids capable of being decomposed, such
+as acidulated water, and solutions containing more or
+less of the metallic elements, decomposition of the solution
+results, with the additional curious phenomenon
+that one of the elements of the decomposed compound
+appears at one terminal, and the other element at the
+other. Thus, if water be the liquid, hydrogen appears
+at one place and the oxygen at another. If the two terminals
+of an electric circuit were on opposite sides of the
+Atlantic Ocean, and a current were sent through the
+circuit, hydrogen would appear on one side and oxygen
+on the other. The oxygen is set free at that terminal
+at which the current reaches the liquid. The direction
+of the current being determined in the ordinary conventional
+way. Bring the wire carrying the current over
+and parallel to a suspended magnetic needle. If the
+current be going from south to north, the north pole will
+be deflected to the west. If the current be going from
+north to south, the south pole will be deflected to the
+west. Hence, if one looks along a wire in the direction
+of the current, oxygen will be given off at the next
+terminal if it dips in water. It may be convenient to
+know that when a battery is employed as a generator of
+electricity, hydrogen is set free at the terminal of the
+battery from which the current flows, and oxygen at
+the other end of that conductor.
+
+The decomposition of water may be taken as a type
+\index{Decomposition of water}%
+of electro-chemical work; hence, when the mechanical
+\DPPageSep{231.png}{219}%
+\index{Dissociations}%
+\index{Polarization of molecules}%
+conditions present where decomposition is going on are
+understood, they may be applied to any other case.
+
+Under the head Chemical Origin of Electricity it %[xref]
+was pointed out that the same factors which gave rise
+to the current also arranged the molecules of the liquid
+so that the oxygen sides of them all faced the same way,
+towards the zinc, which of course necessitates that the
+hydrogen sides should all face in the opposite direction.
+The other terminal of the battery tends to bring about
+a similar condition of things, so that between the terminals
+the molecules are all polarized or brought into an
+orderly arrangement. The direction of the electric
+current in such an arranged body of molecules in the
+liquid is from the zinc to the oxygen---oxygen, hydrogen,
+oxygen, hydrogen, and so on to the last molecule
+in the line, the hydrogen face of which is against the
+other terminal. So far this represents molecular arrangement,
+not molecular or atomic cohesion. There
+is good reason for thinking that dissociation of atoms
+in such molecules is going on all the time in some
+degree, on account of their incessant and vigorous vibratory
+motion. Such motion must tend to disrupt
+the atoms so that at any given instant there would be a
+relatively large number of atoms in the liquid already
+free and quite indifferent as to whether they recombine
+with the same or other atoms the next instant. If there
+be another agency present, like an electrical current,
+adding its energy tending to disruption, not only would
+a larger amount of dissociation take place, but when at
+one end of the line one element of the molecule, like
+oxygen, enters into a new combination which is more
+\DPPageSep{232.png}{220}%
+stable under the conditions present, the remaining hydrogen
+will combine with the oxygen of the adjacent
+molecule when that molecule is broken up, and so on
+along the whole line, leaving the hydrogen of the last
+liquid molecule to be freed against the other plate of
+the battery. This means that there is an exchange of
+partners among all the molecules of the liquid that take
+part in the current, else some of both oxygen and hydrogen
+would be set free elsewhere than at the terminals,
+which never happens.
+
+Now, all molecules are combinations of atoms in
+definite proportions by weight, and it is therefore to be
+expected when such decompositions as the above take
+place the products will be found in the same proportions.
+It is the necessary outcome of the operation. So for
+every one part by weight of hydrogen set free, eight
+parts of oxygen will be liberated; and for a like reason
+twice the volume of hydrogen as of oxygen.
+
+If a current of electricity be led through any liquid
+which it can decompose, and the material of the terminals
+be some substance that neither of the constituents
+of the molecule can combine with, both of the elements
+will be set free. Platinum is such an element; and if
+terminals be made of that, and dip into a tank of water,
+the current polarizes the molecules precisely as in the
+battery, and decomposition takes place in the same way,---oxygen
+being set free at the in-going terminal, and
+hydrogen at the out-going one. If the solution contains
+molecules of metallic salts of copper, nickel, iron, silver,
+gold, etc., the metallic side of the molecule faces in the
+direction of the current, the same as the hydrogen in
+\DPPageSep{233.png}{221}%
+\index{Plating, electro}%
+the former case; and as a consequence, the metal is deposited
+upon the out-going terminal, whatever that may
+be, and the other constituent of the molecule is set free
+at the in-going terminal. For example, the sulphate of
+copper is a compound of copper and sulphuric acid.
+Where it is subject to decomposition by an electric
+current, the copper is deposited at the one terminal, and
+sulphuric acid at the other. If both the terminals be
+made of platinum, one will be covered with copper, and
+the other will be surrounded with the acid, and all the
+copper in the solution may be taken out. If the in-going
+terminal be itself of copper, the sulphuric acid
+set free will itself dissolve off the copper as fast as the
+acid is set free, and in this way the solution will be kept
+saturated. The metal may be deposited on any other
+metal. It is in this manner that electro-plating of all
+sorts is done. Each different metal requires different
+treatment from the others as to solution, electro-motive
+force, current per square inch section, and so on for the
+best results. To decompose water, as much as one and
+a half volts are necessary to initiate it, but copper salts
+require only a small fraction of one volt. The amount
+of decomposition in a given time, say a second or an
+hour, depends upon the current employed. A current
+of one ampère will in an hour decompose only about
+fifteen and four-tenths grains of water, liberating one
+and seven-tenths grains of hydrogen. The weight of
+other elements set free or deposited by an ampère per
+hour is determined by multiplying the weight of hydrogen
+set free by the electro-chemical equivalent of the
+element, and this is either equal to its atomic weight, or
+\DPPageSep{234.png}{222}%
+\index{Lighting, electric}%
+is one-half or one-third that. Thus, the electro-chemical
+equivalent of gold is $\dfrac{196.6}{3} = 65.5$, of silver $\dfrac{108}{2} =
+54$\DPtypo{}{,} of copper $\dfrac{63}{2} = 31.5$, of nickel $\dfrac{57}{2} = 28.5$, and so on.
+So the amount of gold that will be deposited by an
+ampère in an hour is $1.7 × 65 = 111.35$ grains; of silver
+$1.7 × 54 = 91.8$ grains and so on. This shows a
+definite relationship between electricity and chemical
+reactions.
+
+It is to be kept in mind that when substances combine
+there is always some transformation of energy,
+and heat is either absorbed or given out. When
+hydrogen and oxygen combine there is a large amount
+given out, $61,200$ heat units for each pound of hydrogen.
+When, therefore, water is decomposed so as to
+set free one pound of hydrogen, the same amount of
+energy must be spent to do it. The electrical energy
+spent in a decomposing cell is, therefore, reducible to
+the heating effect, and may be calculated as such.
+
+
+\Section{3. LUMINOUS EFFECTS.}
+\index{Luminous effects}%
+
+When an electric current passes from one conductor
+to another through the air an electric arc is produced,
+and great heat and light are developed there. An arc
+is generally about an eighth of an inch long. By
+having a higher electro-motive force one may be made
+several inches long. The arc itself consists of the
+incandescent molecules of the air in its path mixed
+with some of the disintegrated particles of the carbon
+of the terminal. When an arc is formed in a partial
+\DPPageSep{235.png}{223}%
+\index{Geissler's tubes}%
+\index{Spark, electric}%
+\index{Vacuum, a non-conductor}%
+vacuum the character of the phenomenon is very much
+changed. Instead of being concentrated into a narrow
+space, it spreads out into an oval form, the size of
+which depends upon the degree of exhaustion. The
+terminals may be separated to a much greater distance;
+the light becomes less intense, and shows as a kind of
+glowing gaseous globe, and this may extend to the
+walls of the glass vessel in which it is produced.
+
+If the vacuum be made very perfect, no current can
+be got through it; for the ether is a perfect non-conductor.
+Even the spark from an induction coil that
+will jump several feet in the air will not jump a quarter
+of an inch in a vacuum. The jumping ability of
+an electric spark or current depends upon its electro-motive
+force. A thousand volts will jump but
+about the one-hundredth of an inch in common air,
+and ten thousand volts only about one-tenth of an
+inch. From such experiments it has been concluded
+that a flash of lightning probably has an electric pressure
+\index{Lightning}%
+reckoned by hundreds of millions of volts, but
+there is some doubt about the calculation for such
+exceedingly high voltage. Glass tubes provided with
+platinum terminals hermetically sealed, and from which
+the air has been partially removed, when connected
+with the high voltage terminals of an induction coil
+exhibit phenomena that depend altogether upon the
+degree of exhaustion in the tube. If the air pressure
+%[** PP: Width-dependent break]
+% [Illustration]
+\begin{figure}[hbtp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{4in}{236a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{27}{Diag.\ 27.---Crookes's Tube. Long Free Path.}
+\end{figure}
+\index{Crookes' tubes}%
+be removed to about the one-hundredth of the normal
+pressure, the discharge appears as a broad band of
+purplish light between the terminals; if the reduction
+be to the thousandth, the light fills the tube. Still
+\DPPageSep{236.png}{224}%
+further reduced, the discharge appears broken up into
+striæ, or bright disks, their distance apart depending
+upon the degree of exhaustion, and they measure
+roughly the length of the free path of the gaseous
+molecules. If the exhaustion is carried to a very high
+degree, this free path may be made as long as the tube,
+\index{Molecules, long free path}%
+or longer. This means that a molecule may move
+from one end of the tube to the other without coming
+into collision with another one.
+
+When a molecule touches upon the electrified
+terminal, it is impelled from it with great velocity,
+quite like that exhibited in the radiometer, and probably
+\DPPageSep{237.png}{225}%
+\index{Heat by impact}%
+for the same reason. It moves away from the
+terminal in a straight line in obedience to the first
+law of motion, and continues on till it strikes another
+molecule, or the surface of the tube, and it shines as it
+moves, on account of its vigorous internal vibrations;
+for each gas gives its characteristic spectral lines when
+thus made incandescent. Where they strike upon a
+thin piece of platinum they may make it red-hot by
+impact, and where they strike upon the
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{4in}{237a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{28}{Diag.\ 28.---Crookes's Tube. Platinum made Red Hot by Impact.}
+\end{figure}
+walls of the
+glass tube the latter is made luminous with a phosphorescent
+glow, and may be made red-hot, and so
+softened as to bring about a collapse of the tube.
+These tubes are known as Crookes's Tubes, and their
+phenomena are extremely interesting from the insight
+they give into the behavior of matter under all sorts
+of conditions. With a set of these tubes, the laws of
+motion, kinetic energy, sound, heat, light, electricity,
+and magnetism may be illustrated in a way unapproachable
+\DPPageSep{238.png}{226}%
+with any other simple and cheap apparatus. The
+long free path, and inability to turn a corner when
+projected from an electrified terminal, show the first
+law of motion and inertia. The impact of the molecules
+may make a wheel turn round,---an example of
+energy as good as a windmill. The intermittent beats
+upon the sides of the tube produce a sound, the pitch
+of which is the same as that of the vibrations of the
+induction coil. The heating of the tube and its contents
+shows the transformation of free-path motion
+into vibratory molecular motion. The luminousness
+of the gas, and the phosphorescence of the tube, show
+\index{Phosphorescence}%
+the transformation of the electrical energy into the
+vibratory molecular kind, at a rate capable of affecting
+the eye. The phosphoresence\DPnote{** [sic]} itself showing the conditions
+needed for producing it; the origination of the
+motions in the tube showing the relation of electricity
+to the other forms of motion developed; the deflection
+of the stream of electrified molecules by a magnet
+illustrating the effects of a magnetic field upon a
+current of electricity. The fact that such streams of
+molecules are projected from an electrified terminal
+solely by impact there, is shown by their returning to
+it when there is nothing in front of it to expend their
+energy upon, as a ball returns to the earth when
+thrown into the air, which is the case when but one
+terminal is connected with the induction coil; and,
+lastly, such a tube will be lighted up by being merely
+in the neighborhood of an induction coil, or rather in
+a varying electric field. They may be insulated and
+several feet away from such induction coil or a Holtz
+\DPPageSep{239.png}{227}%
+or other similar machine and yet be internally lighted
+every time a spark passes, which shows that the luminousness
+seen in the tubes is not necessarily due to any
+electrical current present, because in this case there
+can be no electrical current.
+
+
+\Section{THE NATURE OF ELECTRICITY.}
+
+There have been many theories proposed to account
+for electrical phenomena, yet to-day there is no one
+that is generally held, even as a provisional one, among
+physicists. Some have even abandoned the hope of
+mankind ever being able to reach a consistent theory of
+it. The case has been the same in the history of heat,
+of light, and of magnetism; yet text-books of to-day do
+not hesitate to state what is the nature of each of these.
+Electrical phenomena have greater variety, and the
+apparent dual character oftentimes present has served
+to give a perplexing degree of complexity to them.
+The writer has thought that a summation of the principal
+factors present in electrical phenomena might be
+helpful to some in their endeavor to find some physical
+explanation without having to assume something \textit{sui
+generis}, which has no other necessity for being except
+the very dubious one of accounting for a certain phenomenon.
+Caloric, light corpuscles, and vital force
+were such visionary creations; but further knowledge
+has enabled science to dispense with all of them, leaving
+nothing in their places but what was known to
+exist before; namely, matter, ether, and their motions.
+Such a steady course of reduction to these factors
+leaves one with the fair presumption that it will likely
+\DPPageSep{240.png}{228}%
+fare the same way with any other agencies that have
+been imagined to account for phenomena, though the
+latter may, for the time being, seem not reducible to
+simple mechanics.
+
+There are certain \textit{a~priori} reasons for thinking that
+in electrical matters, as in all other physical agencies,
+only matter, ether, and motion are concerned. No one
+has ventured to identify ordinary matter and electricity,
+which cuts down the possibility to one of the remaining
+two.
+
+If it be admitted that matter is not altered in quantity
+by any process to which it may be submitted, and
+also that the amount of ether and energy in the universe
+are constant, it follows that all the different phenomena
+exhibited by matter are due to the different
+kinds of motion it may have; for \emph{motion is the only
+variable factor}. On such a premise one can fairly
+maintain that no matter how obscure and puzzling a
+phenomenon may be, its explanation lies altogether in
+its characteristic motions, and, when they are fully
+made out, there will be no more to learn about it. If
+so much be granted, one has got on a long way towards
+the final answer to the questions, What is the nature of
+heat? what is the nature of light? what is the nature
+of electricity? Two of these are settled, and no one
+thinks of asking as to their nature. The nature of
+heat was settled by Rumford and Davy, that it is a form
+of motion in matter. The nature of light was settled
+by Young and Fizeau, that it is a form of motion in
+the ether. What remained to be done was simply to
+discover the particular kind of motion in each case.
+\DPPageSep{241.png}{229}%
+\index{Electricity, origin of}%
+Spectrum analysis and photography have since given
+us the particulars. Electricity is on precisely the same
+philosophical basis; and, in the absence of evidence of
+the existence of some other physical factors than matter,
+the ether, and motion, one would be entitled to the philosophical
+opinion that \emph{electricity must be some form of
+motion}. What the particular form is may be a subject
+of investigation, but not the nature of it.
+
+It is my purpose to show, \emph{first}, that in every case
+where electricity is produced motion of some sort is
+antecedent to its production; \emph{second}, that in every
+case the effect of electricity is to produce motion of
+some sort, and that itself is annihilated in doing it in
+precisely the same sense as motion of any other sort is
+annihilated when it is transformed.
+
+1. \emph{As to its origin}. When the face of the thermopile
+is heated and electricity is produced, we know that
+vibratory molecular motion is the condition for its appearance.
+
+In a galvanic battery the molecular exchanges by
+which zinc is dissolved and oxidized, and hydrogen is
+set free, are well known, and also the heat equivalent
+of such re-actions; and they are measured in heat units,
+which in turn may be made the measure of the electricity
+developed.
+
+When glass or wax or other substance becomes electrified
+by friction, the word itself expresses the condition
+necessary for producing it. Mechanical friction
+is the antecedent.
+
+When a conductor is moved in a magnetic field and
+becomes electrified, the effect depends absolutely upon
+\DPPageSep{242.png}{230}%
+\index{Electricity, mechanical origin}%
+\index{Electricity, electrical origin}%
+the motion. Stop that and all evidence of electricity
+disappears.
+
+The same thing is true when electricity is developed
+by so-called induction in a field produced by a neighboring
+body that is electrified in any way. The continuous
+production of it implies continuous motion of one or
+the other body.
+
+In dynamos of every variety of form the mechanical
+motion turned into them is the antecedent, and the
+energy of the engine spent in turning the dynamo has
+its full representation in the electric energy developed,
+and when there is no motion there is no electricity.
+
+In the physiological development there are always
+chemical, thermal, and mechanical motions, which are
+spent to produce what electrical phenomena appear,
+whether in mankind or in animals.
+
+In the air and in the earth there are changing temperatures,
+condensations, etc., which signify molecular
+motions.
+
+Some crystals, like tourmaline, become electric by
+heating; some, like mica, become electric by splitting;
+and so on. Every one implies that some kind of motion
+has to be spent to develop the electrical condition, and
+in each case the particular kind of motion that has
+been spent to produce it has been \emph{spent}; that is, it has
+been transformed in the same sense that the translatory
+motion of a bullet has been transformed into vibratory
+when it strikes the target. The electricity thus appears
+as the representative of the kind of motion that
+has been destroyed.
+
+Some have imagined that electricity was a kind of
+\DPPageSep{243.png}{231}%
+\index{Electrical effects}%
+\index{Stress, electrical}%
+dual matter, which was broken up by the various processes
+described, or that some substance was transferred
+from one place to another, so that there was
+more than the normal amount in one place and less in
+another. Even such conceptions do not get rid of the
+idea of motion being the chief characteristic, for the
+separations are the ideal embodiments of motion, and
+in this case the measure of it; so nothing whatever is
+gained, either in clearness or simplicity, by such invention.
+
+2. \emph{The effects of electricity} are to bring about mechanical
+motions of some sort.
+
+The stress into which the ether is thrown by either
+an electrified or magnetized body is a change of position
+of adjacent parts with reference to each other,
+and the fact that this stress travels with the velocity
+of light shows that motion is the essence of it. The
+re-action of the stress in the ether upon other matter
+in it always results in the motion of the latter. If the
+whole body can move, it will do so, and mechanical
+motion is the immediate effect. If it cannot move as
+a whole, its molecules are twisted into new positions,
+so that motion, either molar or molecular, is the result.
+
+As the electric current in a conductor always heats
+the latter in every part, one has but to reflect upon the
+character of heat motions to perceive that some kind
+of motion must be the antecedent of it. Consider a
+short portion of wire through which a current of electricity
+flows. It becomes warmer and now radiates
+faster into space. It is losing motion by imparting it
+to the ether. Trace back the ancestry of the ether
+\DPPageSep{244.png}{232}%
+\index{Electrical effects, reversible}%
+\index{Physical processes, reversible}%
+motion, and it appears as vibratory motions of the
+molecules of the conductor, thence as electrical current,
+thence as armature rotations of a dynamo, thence to
+the engine movements, thence to the furnace and the
+chemical re-actions going on there. There is no question
+as to the nature of the factors in all of these but
+one. Call the chemical re-actions \textit{A}, the engine \textit{B},
+the dynamo \textit{C}, the electricity \textit{D}, the heat \textit{E}, and the
+ether waves \textit{F}. With the exception of \textit{D}, each one is
+known to represent a certain kind of motion, molar or
+molecular, and all in a consecutive series. Is it not
+difficult to conceive that the step \textit{D} can be anything
+different in character from the rest of the series, and,
+whether understood or not, must represent some phase
+of motion? To think otherwise is to think that motion
+can have some other antecedent than motion. Whoever
+sets himself in earnest to this problem will see
+there is but one answer to it.
+
+So heat effects, light effects, chemical effects, as
+well as the direct mechanical ones shown in Crookes's
+Tubes, or otherwise, will lead to precisely the same
+conclusion that \emph{electricity represents an intermediate
+molecular kind of motion}, having definite motions
+for its antecedent, and definite motions for its consequent,
+and so must itself be some peculiar form of
+motion, differing from the others as they differ among
+themselves, and nothing beyond that. It may also be
+remarked that every form of motion which is capable,
+under definite mechanical conditions, of developing
+electricity, electricity is itself capable of producing.
+The processes are all reversible. If heat will produce
+\DPPageSep{245.png}{233}%
+electricity, electricity will produce heat. If chemical
+re-actions produce electricity, electricity will produce
+chemical re-actions, and so on of all the rest; so if they
+be reducible to motions, so must electricity.
+
+Such considerations make logically certain what the
+nature of electricity is; but they do not indicate what
+the character of the motions is that gives it identity,
+and distinguishes it so radically from other well-known
+kinds of motion. In the chapter on ``Motion'' it is
+pointed out that there are three fundamental kinds of
+motions,---translatory, vibratory, and rotary,---and
+that with these all the various complicated motions of
+mechanical processes may be produced. It is also
+pointed out that for convenience we call those motions
+mechanical that are on a scale of visible magnitude,
+but such as cannot be seen are called molecular and
+atomic. It is plain, in this case, that the motions must
+be on a molecular scale, for no motions are directly
+perceived in electrical phenomena any more than in
+heat phenomena; so there remains for consideration
+what evidence there is for the motion being molecular
+and therefore of matter, or of the ether.
+
+It appears that when certain kinds of work, such as
+friction, are spent upon a mass of ordinary matter, electricity
+is developed, and we say the body is electrified.
+The body in this condition at once re-acts upon the
+ether about it; and it has happened that some persons
+have given most attention to this effect of the electrified
+body, and the phenomena that may result from it,
+and have called \emph{it} electricity; while others have given
+more attention to the condition of the matter that
+\DPPageSep{246.png}{234}%
+\index{Electricity, dual}%
+\index{Ether rotations}%
+induced the ether stress, and they have called \emph{that}
+electricity; while the greater number have hopelessly
+confused the two, calling both by the same name, just
+as formerly heat and ether waves were both called
+heat. It is plain that a physical condition of things in
+matter requiring a name ought not to be designated by
+the same term as that physical condition in the ether
+which is the result of the first. One is, therefore,
+justified by the logical necessity of making a distinction,
+in adopting the name electricity as applicable to
+one and not the other, and also in calling the phenomenon
+in matter by that name and denying its applicability
+to any effect of it wherever it is plain there has
+been a transformation. Thus it would be as illogical
+to call ether waves set up by an electrified body electrical
+waves, as it would be to call the swinging of a
+pendulum that was actuated by electrical attractions
+electrical vibrations.
+
+We are, therefore, now reduced to the sole consideration
+as to the character of those molecular motions
+which differentiate electricity from heat and free-path
+motion; and here the apparent dual character, which
+has been so puzzling, helps at once to an understanding
+of it.
+
+For many years it has been merely a matter of convention
+that a current of electricity is said to move in
+a certain direction in a wire. It has often been noticed
+that there is an apparent current in both directions
+from any electrical source; and one has been called a
+positive, the other a negative, one; yet the current,
+reckoned either way from its source, is always the
+\DPPageSep{247.png}{235}%
+\index{Magnetic rotation}%
+\index{Rotations in ether}%
+same at a given point, and has not unfrequently been
+considered as made up of two currents moving in
+opposite directions.
+
+If one will take a limp rope a few feet long and tie
+its ends together so as to form a ring, and, holding it
+in his two hands, will begin to twist it in one direction,
+he will see the twist start in opposite directions at his
+hands, and each one can be traced quite round the ring,
+neither interfering with the other; yet one is a right-handed
+twist, the other a left-handed one; and one
+might call one a positive and the other a negative current.
+There will be as much twist in one part of the
+rope as in any other, and the rate of rotation at the
+hands will be the measure of the amount of motion,
+and, consequently, of the energy that is in the circuit.
+For a rope substitute a wire, and for the hands a
+battery or a dynamo, and the analogy is complete,
+except that no rotation is seen in the wire as a whole;
+so, if there be rotations, they must be of molecules and
+not of the mass. Molecular motions must, of course,
+be inferential. It is so for heat. The waves called
+ether waves imply vibrations of matter; and, if there
+be any known rotary motions in the ether, they would
+imply molecular rotations for the same reason. It is
+conceded that in every electro-magnetic field the ether
+is in a rotary motion, and in numerous books it is
+pictured as a whirl both about a magnet and a wire
+carrying an electric current. The rotation of an electric
+arc in a magnetic field shows it, and the twist
+given to a polarized ray of light in passing through it
+also shows it; and it has been so interpreted for years.
+\DPPageSep{248.png}{236}%
+The twist given to a conductor through which a current
+is flowing, which has been before alluded to, also
+gives direct evidence of the same condition; so the
+phenomena confirm the conjecture that the phenomenon
+in matter which is called \emph{electricity is a phenomenon
+of rotating molecules}, in the same sense as the
+phenomenon called heat is a phenomenon of vibrating
+molecules.
+
+If the atoms in molecules, and the molecules themselves,
+were absolutely fixed in position so as to have
+no individual freedom of motion, there could be neither
+vibration nor rotation; but the vibrations tend continually
+to separate them, and hence between impacts
+there is freedom for rotary slip, if there be any tendency
+to do so. In an electro-magnetic field the ether
+stress re-acts upon molecules in it so as to rotate them
+upon some axis tending to set them in certain position
+with reference to it. This action will be stronger upon
+an atom or molecule immediately adjacent to an electrified
+molecule than to one more distant, and one may
+therefore infer that the process called conduction,
+where heat is the immediate effect of an electric current,
+is really an induction effect, and depends directly
+upon the ether rather than upon the direct mechanical
+effect of one molecule upon another; for such mechanical
+action would make the rotation of adjacent molecules
+to be opposite in direction, whereas in an electric
+current all are in one direction. There is, therefore,
+impact and slip, impact and slip; each impact knocking
+the molecule out of the position the induction had
+set it in, and each arrest of the slip resulting in increasing
+\DPPageSep{249.png}{237}%
+the amplitude of vibration, and hence raising
+the temperature of the conductor. Hence, the explanation
+of the transformation of electrical energy
+into heat energy. An electric current is, therefore,
+not a simple phenomenon, but is considerably complicated,
+involving motions of both molecules and the
+ether; the molecular motion depending directly upon
+the re-action of the ether stress produced by an adjacent
+molecule rather than upon mechanical contact.
+The electrical condition called static being itself a
+compound of abnormal molecular position and stressed
+ether, is the condition which, while being propagated
+in a conductor, constitutes an electric current, propagated
+in the ether, constitutes an ether wave.
+%\DPPageSep{250.png}{238}%
+
+
+\Chapter{IX}{Chemism}{238}
+
+\label{chap:chemism}%
+\index{Chemism}%
+
+\First{The} atomic theory of matter was held in some form
+by ancient philosophers, but the reasons they assigned
+for their opinion were not such reasons as have led
+men of the present day to adopt that theory to the exclusion
+of all others. Modern chemical analysis enables
+one to reduce compound substances to their elementary
+forms, and out of those to build up numerous
+other substances with entirely different qualities.
+Each such elementary form can be isolated, its properties
+can be studied, and by compounding them one can
+at will produce thousands of substances, each with its
+own distinctive qualities. Some of the more thoughtful
+men of all ages have pondered upon the fundamental
+questions of physical science, and they have guessed
+how it might be: some guessed this way, some guessed
+that, and none of them gave a sufficient reason. It
+would be very remarkable if, among a multitude of
+guessers, some did not guess nearer right than others;
+but such lucky guessing hardly entitles one to the
+honor of being the founder of a philosophy that had
+to wait for later men and entirely different methods to
+substantiate it. And this is the real state of the case
+in nearly all departments of knowledge. Ask any chemist
+\DPPageSep{251.png}{239}%
+\index{Atoms, chemical properties}%
+to-day why he holds the atomic theory of matter, and
+he will reply that he can isolate the elements, and by no
+process yet discovered can they be more finely divided;
+that he can measure their individual magnitude and
+weigh them, prove their existence in the sun and stars;
+so that the weight of evidence is exceedingly great.
+He will never think of assigning any such reasons as
+the early philosophers gave for their teaching. Many
+of the properties of bodies of visible magnitude depend
+upon the number and arrangement of the molecules
+that compose them, but the properties of atoms are
+fundamental and not subject to change. All substances
+are identified by means of their properties, and the
+chemical properties of atoms are among the most important.
+Not only do atoms combine together in groups
+called molecules, consisting of two or more atoms, but
+they combine in definite proportions by weight, and only
+so; and these proportions are called the atomic weights
+of the elements, and are known for all of them; so
+that molecules are compounds of definite constituents,
+definite weight, and possessing definite properties. For
+instance, water is made up of hydrogen and oxygen, two
+parts by weight of hydrogen and sixteen of oxygen;
+and as to its properties, such as density, specific gravity,
+conditions at different temperatures, etc., all are familiar
+with. Most of these properties of bodies are called
+physical, but by chemical properties is meant the
+ability of atoms to enter into definite combinations
+with other atoms, to form new compounds and develop
+new properties. The chemist is concerned with such
+atomic exchanges, called re-actions, and notes the conditions
+\DPPageSep{252.png}{240}%
+\index{Affinity, chemical}%
+under which they take place, and some of the
+new qualities that appear, such as its physical condition,
+as to being a solid, a liquid, or a gas at certain
+temperatures, its crystalline form, if it has any, its
+behavior with polarized light, and so on.
+
+Underneath all chemical re-actions there lies the
+question as to why atoms combine at all. At first it was
+explained as due to an attractive force,---chemical attraction,
+possessed by all atoms, but in different degrees
+by different elements. When it became known that
+this acted in definite selective ways, it was called chemical
+affinity, but was still supposed to be a peculiar
+force unrelated to other forces supposed to exist, such
+as heat, light, electricity, and so on. In the progress of
+knowledge, it became apparent that these latter phenomena
+were so directly related to each other that they
+were capable of being transformed one into the other,
+and then the expression ``correlation of forces'' began
+to be used. A further analysis showed them to differ
+from each other chiefly in the character of the motion
+involved in the phenomena; and so forces, as such, have
+been banished from physical science, leaving not even
+a single primal force; for as each one can be changed
+at will into any of the others there is simply a closed
+chain of phenomena, no one of which can be called an
+elementary one more than any other.
+
+Chemical phenomena have been found to be a part of
+the same grand division, and the term ``chemical affinity''
+has itself been in a measure supplanted by the
+term ``chemism,'' which is now used to signify the
+quality possessed by atoms to enter into definite combinations;
+\DPPageSep{253.png}{241}%
+\index{Chemism and heat}%
+and its explanation is to be found by noting
+the factors present when atomic and molecular exchanges
+take place, and these have been found to be all
+physical without exception. There is a large field
+known as chemical physics with which one needs to be
+acquainted in order to understand simple chemical
+operations; namely, the effects of heat, light, and
+electricity in bringing about chemical changes.
+
+When hydrogen combines with oxygen to form water
+the process is called a chemical one; but, as has been
+pointed out in the subject ``Heat,'' there is a definite
+amount of heat given out by the combination of a definite
+amount of the elements; and in like manner the
+dissociation of the elements in water requires the expenditure
+of energy proportionate to the amount decomposed.
+This too is called a chemical process, but
+the conditions for doing either are purely physical, depending
+absolutely upon heat. The elements cannot
+combine when heat cannot be given out, and cannot be
+separated except by an equal expenditure. What is
+true for this example is true in degree for all other
+chemical re-actions; physical energy is involved in every
+change and is the condition for the change. The first
+law of thermo-dynamics states the quantitative relation
+between heat and mechanical work; viz., that it is measurable
+in foot pounds, and is equal to $772$ foot pounds
+per pound degree, and this is called a heat unit. Now,
+the chemical combination of a pound of hydrogen with
+oxygen gives $61,000$ heat units, and is therefore at once
+measureable in foot pounds, showing a direct relation
+between chemical re-actions and heat or work.
+\DPPageSep{254.png}{242}%
+
+It has also been discovered by experiment that in the
+absence of heat chemical re-actions cannot go on, and
+this has led chemists to the conclusion that at absolute
+zero chemism does not exist. There is not only no
+selective action, but no cohesion among atoms, and all
+molecules would fall to pieces---that is, to atoms, quite
+dissociated---at absolute zero. Instead of requiring
+\index{Absolute zero}%
+\Pagelabel{242}%
+$61,000$ heat units to dissociate a pound of hydrogen
+from water, it would not require any, for if the atoms
+do not cohere, no work would need to be done in order
+to separate them.\footnote
+ {See Appendix, \Pageref{p.}{400}.} %[** PP: Original reads p. 399]
+
+From this, then, it appears that chemism is determined
+by heat, and does not exist in the absence of
+temperature. When it is developed it manifests itself
+in selective ways, and in the formation of definite compounds;
+and it therefore is a proper subject of inquiry
+as to how the temperature of atoms can give such selective
+qualities to them. This requires a reconsideration
+of the distinctive quality of heat itself. It has been
+pointed out that this consists in the internal vibratory
+motions of atoms and molecules, as distinguished from
+translatory and rotary motions; that the evidence for
+this comes, first, from the fact that a body of any size
+possessing any degree of heat---that is, having a temperature
+above absolute zero---is constantly exchanging
+its energy with the ether, and that the rate of the exchange
+depends upon the temperature; and, second, that
+translatory motions of bodies in ether do not require
+the expenditure of energy, or, in other words, that for
+such motions the ether is frictionless. This is the
+same as saying that, where the heat of a body is lost by
+\DPPageSep{255.png}{243}%
+\index{Atoms, vibrations of}%
+radiation, it is the internal vibratory motion alone that
+is lost, not its translatory velocity. Consider a body of
+any magnitude whatever, having any temperature whatever,
+and moving at any assignable velocity in space.
+After an interval it will have lost some of its temperature
+by radiation, and, if it moves long enough, it might
+lose it all, reaching absolute zero; but its translatory
+velocity will not therefore be reduced in any degree.
+Hence, in considering the heat in a body, independent
+of any other motions it may have, one has only to do
+with its internal vibratory movements, and that the
+temperature of a body, say an atom, is measured by
+the amplitude of its vibration, and is proportional to the
+square of that amplitude.
+
+If, therefore, chemism is directly related to heat, one
+must attend to what must be going on in an atom, not
+groups of them.
+
+To say that an atom vibrates is to say that it is
+changing its form, and to explain how changing its form
+can result in such selective properties as atoms exhibit
+is to explain chemism by the mechanics of the motion
+involved. Whether atoms have one form or another
+will make no difference in this argument, which is that
+the result is due to change of form, whatever that may
+be; but, for making the subject mechanically clear, some
+form may be adopted, and one can do no better than to
+choose that form which now has most probability in its
+favor judged by other phenomena; that is, the vortex-ring,
+which has been treated under the head of ``The
+Ether.''
+
+When such a body vibrates in its simple way it
+\DPPageSep{256.png}{244}%
+\index{Attraction of vortex rings}%
+elongates alternately on two axes at right angles to
+each other; that is, the change in form is from a circle
+to an ellipse, so as to assume first a horizontal, then a
+vertical elliptical form, as shown in the cut. Such
+%[Illustration: \textsc{Diag.~29.}]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{256a}
+ \Caption{29}{Diag.\ 29.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+changes are due to the elasticity of
+the ring, and are brought about in
+such an atom by impact, by friction,
+and by absorption of ether waves.
+Whether produced in one way or
+another, they represent absorbed energy
+and exhibit it as heat, the temperature
+of a given one depending upon the amplitude
+given to it by a definite amount of energy however
+applied.
+
+Such changing forms imply nodes and loops in the
+vibrating body, positions of minimum and maximum
+motions; and when the vibratory rate is the fundamental
+one,---that is, the lowest rate the body can have,---there
+will be four of each, the nodes being the positions of
+minimum change of form. Such nodes may be seen in
+vibrating bodies of all sorts,---strings, bells, rods, pipes,
+and rings. The size of a body makes no difference in
+this characteristic, and it therefore may be affirmed of
+atoms as well as of any other magnitudes.
+
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.5in}{258a}
+ \Caption{30}{Diag.\ 30.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+Let it be admitted that vibrating atoms can cohere
+for any reason, it will be seen that an atom such as
+represented could only have other atoms attached to it,
+and be in a stable condition, when they were at the
+nodes; and in this case four might be so attached and
+no more, if they were approximately of the same size.
+Such places in atoms might be called bonds: they would
+\DPPageSep{257.png}{unnumbered}%
+% [Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{3.75in}{257a}
+ \end{center}
+ \caption{Geometrical Forms of Snow Flakes.}
+\index{Crystallization}%
+\end{figure}
+\DPPageSep{258.png}{245}%
+be definite in number, position, and strength. If the
+other attached atoms were themselves
+vibrating, they
+would each have their own
+nodes; and if they were free
+to turn into any position, one
+might be sure that the nodes
+of each would be in contact,
+and that the loops of the vibratory
+motions would be where
+space to move in without interruption
+was free. Such a combination
+of atoms might be called a molecule. It would
+consist of a definite number of atoms, each with its own
+atomic weight; and if the strength of
+the cohesion depended upon the vibratory
+motion, it is easily seen that when
+there was quiescence in that there
+would be disruption or dissociation.
+%[Illustrations]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \hfil
+ \begin{minipage}{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{258b}
+ \Caption{31}{Diag.\ 31.}
+ \end{minipage}
+ \hfil
+ \begin{minipage}{1.5in}
+ \Graphic{1.5in}{258c}
+ \Caption{32}{Diag.\ 32.}
+ \end{minipage}
+ \hfil
+ \end{center}
+\end{figure}
+Moreover, when there was such a nodal
+bond it would be like a hinge, and two thus united
+could swing upon it; while if three were thus united
+and two were to swing upwards,
+they would meet at a node on
+each and stick together for the
+same reason the other nodes did,
+thus forming a symmetrical and
+stable figure against which other
+similar ones could be built up,
+node against node indefinitely. A
+hexagonal figure would result. If four were attached
+to the primary nodes, and each was to swing up ninety
+\DPPageSep{259.png}{246}%
+\index{Chemical field}%
+\index{Fields, chemical}%
+\index{Fields, mechanical}%
+degrees, there would be formed a sort of cubical box
+without a lid; but at the top will be presented four
+open nodes, upon which the four nodes of any other
+similar one might be placed: and thus could a cubical
+structure be built by addition of similar forms indefinitely.
+Such symmetrical forms are called crystals.
+
+Of course all this presupposes that there is some
+good mechanical reason for atomic cohesion, that is in
+some way dependent upon temperature; and to make
+this clear it is needful, first, to call to mind some phenomena
+of a similar sort on a larger scale.
+
+It is well known that if a light body be brought near
+a vibrating tuning-fork, the latter acts as if it attracted
+it, for the light body will move towards the fork. The
+same thing is true of other vibrating bodies, and the
+explanation is that the vibratory motion reduces the
+pressure about the body. Thus, suppose the hand to
+move to and fro; as it moves forward the air in front
+of it is somewhat condensed, while that behind it is
+partially rarefied; when the hand returns the same
+thing happens. The air follows up the hand because
+the pressure is reduced next the hand, and if the hand
+could swing back and forth, faster than the air could
+return to it, there would be formed a perfect air vacuum;
+and that means that the pressure would be
+nothing at the hand and fifteen pounds per square
+inch at a distance from it. Hence any body placed near
+the hand would be subject to a pressure greater on its
+remote side than on the side adjacent to the hand, and
+would be pushed by it towards the hand. This would
+be a phenomenon similar to attraction, the movement
+\DPPageSep{260.png}{unnumbered}%
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{260a}
+
+ \scriptsize CRYSTALLINE FORMS.\\[6pt]
+ \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
+ The above figures illustrate very clearly the molecular arrangement in crystals of
+ various kinds. \textit{A}~represents a cross section of Brazilian Topaz, as shown in polarized
+ light. \textit{B}~is a hollow faced cube of salt, and \textit{C}~a similar hollow faced octahedron of
+ copper sulphide. They show that the cohesive strength is greater on the edges than
+ elsewhere. Some crystals, when being dissolved, leave a complete skeleton of themselves
+ the last to disappear. \textit{D}~is a skeleton crystal of silver from Scotland, where the
+ structure consists of a series of minute octahedral crystals adhering to each other in
+ such directions as would build up a single large octahedral crystal if filled out.
+ \end{minipage}
+ \end{center}
+\end{figure}
+\DPPageSep{261.png}{247}%
+\index{Crystallization}%
+\index{Vibrations, sympathetic}%
+towards the vibrating body being due directly to the
+pressure of the medium, while the difference in the
+medium would itself be directly due to the vibratory
+movement. The amount of such difference in pressure
+is evidently determined by the degree of vibration.
+Now, if one can imagine a similar condition of things
+about an atom vibrating in the ether, he can understand
+how its vibratory movements might reduce the ether
+pressure adjacent to it in a way proportional to the
+movement, and also how at the nodes such effect would
+be at a minimum, and at the loops at a maximum, so
+there would be produced what is called a field. As the
+condition that produced it was one of mechanical
+motion, one might call the field a mechanical field, for
+mechanical effects of translatory motion result from it.
+
+When such an effect takes place among atoms one
+might distinguish it as a \emph{chemical} field, for it would
+bring about mutual cohesion among atoms, and the
+nodes would determine the positions of stable combinations;
+and a molecule so built up would require an
+amount of energy spent upon it to break it up equivalent
+to the energy spent, to produce the field, or, in
+other words, equivalent to the heat in the atom.
+
+It is here to be noted that when atoms combine in
+this way each one retains abundant space for its heat
+movements, so its temperature may be varied within
+considerable limits without interfering with molecular
+stability. And, if the vibratory movements continue,
+then each molecule will have its own field, which will
+be the resultant of all the fields of the atoms that are
+combined thus to make the molecule. The field of a
+\DPPageSep{262.png}{248}%
+\index{Growth}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+molecule will then have a form which will depend
+absolutely upon the number and arrangement of the
+constituent atoms, and will extend to some distance in
+space beyond the geometric boundary of the molecule
+itself.
+
+The presence of such a chemical field must affect
+other chemical fields in the neighboring space where
+the fields overlap, hindering or facilitating the exchange
+of atoms in other molecules, because lessening the
+pressure holding them together. There are many
+examples of this kind of action known. It is called
+catalysis, which signifies the action of a given substance
+\index{Catalysis}%
+in bringing about chemical reactions without
+itself being changed. For example, the binoxide of
+manganese, when mixed with the chlorate of potash,
+greatly facilitates its decomposition by heat, though
+the binoxide is itself not decomposed. Pure zinc is
+dissolved with difficulty by sulphuric acid; but a little
+mercury or iron, or other so-called impurity, enables it
+to be dissolved freely. Hydrogen and oxygen gases will
+not combine when simply mixed; but a little spongy
+platinum placed in the mixture will at once bring about
+the combination, but will itself suffer no chemical
+change. These gases will also slowly combine in the
+presence of mercury when kept at the temperature of~$305°$.
+In glass vessels without the mercury no combination
+at that temperature occurs, but on raising the temperature
+to~$448°$ it combines very slowly. In smelting
+operations a flux has a similar function, and in some
+cases the boundary line of such action can be observed.
+Some re-actions take place at a different rate near the
+\DPPageSep{263.png}{249}%
+sides of the vessel that contains the solution than away
+from it, and some mixtures of substances in solution
+will separate from each other except within a short distance
+from the surface. Such phenomena show that
+the mere presence of some substances is sufficient to
+profoundly affect chemical re-actions. The chemical
+field of substances gives a consistent explanation of
+catalysis. There is another class of phenomena well
+known, but hitherto without any rational explanation;
+viz., some supersaturated solutions seem unable to initiate
+the process of crystallization, but the smallest crystal
+of the substance starts it, and the whole body is
+solidified in a few seconds. Here it is evident that the
+crystal, taken as a nucleus, had a field that compelled
+other and similar molecular groups to arrange themselves
+in similar order. This is a phenomenon of such
+importance as to warrant some attention here. When
+two tuning-forks having the same pitch are separate
+from each other a distance of several feet, and one of
+them be made to produce a sound, the other one will be
+made to sound likewise by the action of the sound
+waves in the air upon it. The effect is called sympathetic
+vibration. Other forks having different rates of
+vibration will not be similarly affected, so the vibrations
+in the air select out the particular fork having the same
+rate as the one vibrating, and cause it to enter into a
+similar state of vibration. So it appears with a magnet.
+Any magnetic bodies in its field become magnetized
+there; that is, they are brought into the same physical
+state as the body that incited the field. Such physical
+fields, then, are capable of compelling bodies in them
+\DPPageSep{264.png}{250}%
+\index{Fields, magnetic}%
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+\Pagelabel{252}%
+to assume the same state of motion or similar position,
+or both, as the body that produced the field, provided
+the substance itself be constituted molecularly like the
+first,---and this simply by being in proximity, not by
+contact. It is a kind of induction, common through
+the whole domain of physics. In the organic world of
+living things the phenomenon of growth is manifested
+by what are called cells, which are symmetrical groups
+of molecules, as crystals are, only much more complex.
+Growth consists in the formation of similar cells out of
+suitable molecular constituents in the neighborhood.
+Each different part of a plant or animal has a different
+cell structure. If, therefore, it be conceded that each
+cell has a field, which is the resultant of all the elements
+that make it up, it will be seen how such field
+must act upon other matter within it, compelling it to
+assume a form similar to the cell that produces the
+field; that is, to form a similar cell adjacent to itself.
+Such formation is called growth; but the similarity in
+form and function, when appearing among plants or
+animals, has been considered as due to heredity, a term
+that has a definite enough meaning, but which has not
+been supposed to be due to mechanical necessity but
+to some super-physical agency not amenable to purely
+physical laws and conditions. It is possible to pursue
+this much further and to show that cell structure itself
+may be modified by molecular fields, and how stability
+of form and function are possible with some and not
+with others,---how what in natural history is called
+variability, reversion, and other phenomena of the sort,
+are explicable as due to the same factors that \DPtypo{organizes}{organize}
+\DPPageSep{265.png}{251}%
+atoms into molecules, and molecules into crystals.
+Every one interested in the fundamental questions of
+chemistry will be able to follow out in many ways the
+mechanical conceptions here introduced, and compare
+what he knows of chemical re-actions with them. It
+will be especially helpful for one to draw upon paper
+such ideal atomic rings with their edges touching, and
+marking where the nodes must be. Such diagrams as
+the one on \hyperref[fig:30]{p.~\pageref{fig:30}, fig.~30}, thus drawn, cut out, and the
+parts bent up until they touch each other, will probably
+surprise one at first to find how the nodes will be
+brought adjacent to each other and therefore into a
+stable position.
+
+So far it has been assumed that there will be in the
+ether about a vibrating atom an effect comparable with
+the effect produced in air about a tuning-fork or other
+vibrating body that is producing sound waves. One
+might be satisfied that there was such an action, even
+though he were not able to explain it, provided there
+were good reason for the assumption. The case is the
+same as for a magnetic field within which magnetic
+phenomena take place, though a magnetic field cannot
+be isolated. It is the same for the existence of the
+ether itself: it is inferential, but from a large body of
+phenomena of different sorts, all corroborating the hypothesis;
+so one is satisfied. When a magnet acts upon
+a piece of iron not in contact with itself, we explain the
+action by the magnetic field; and, if a body acts chemically
+upon other bodies not in immediate contact, controlling
+their motions and positions, as is the case, the
+same kind of an assumption is to be entertained. If a
+\DPPageSep{266.png}{252}%
+\index{Heat, effects}%
+reasonable explanation for the existence of the field
+can be offered, all the better, though no one holds more
+lightly upon a magnetic field because he cannot explain
+it. In the chapter on magnetism it is remarked that
+there is good reason to think that atoms of all kinds
+are magnets. If that be the case, then every atom has
+a field of its own, wherever it may be; and it would
+seem likely that this magnetic field of atoms was the
+underlying factor in the so-called chemical field; and it
+is therefore well to analyze the phenomena, having that
+magnetic field in mind.
+
+A single magnet of any form will have its field
+under all conditions, and the \emph{shape of the field will be
+determined by the form of the magnet}. If the magnet
+were of sufficient size, there would be no difficulty in
+locating it by its field, even though the magnet itself
+could not be seen. A number of magnets arranged
+promiscuously would so neutralize each other's fields
+as to have no residual field, and in order to detect the
+existence of magnetism it would be needful to get very
+close to an individual magnet. When a steel magnet
+is dissolved in an acid all evidence of the existence of
+magnetism disappears, for the iron molecules are now
+separated from each other and are scattered promiscuously
+through the solution. Any disturbance whatever
+that disarranges the magnetic arrangement of
+molecules destroys the evidence of the magnetic field,
+except at very short distances. When a piece of iron
+is heated to redness it cannot be made magnetic in
+the ordinary sense; for the vigor of the vibratory movement
+continually knocks the molecules into new positions,
+\DPPageSep{267.png}{253}%
+and therefore changes their resultant fields,
+leaving but a neutral effect upon outside bodies.
+
+As chemical re-actions take place in liquids or gases,
+and only exceedingly slow in solids, it follows that in
+them one has to deal with molecules in all positions,---that
+is, an entirely disordered arrangement, and such as
+would exhibit no evidence of magnetic field, even though
+every atom was itself a strong magnet; and this condition
+of neutrality would be constant so long as the
+temperature kept up so much mechanical disturbance
+as to prevent any systematic arrangement. Yet it is
+to be borne in mind that the magnetic field of no one
+has been \DPtypo{distroyed}{destroyed}: it is as strong, as far reaching, as
+ever; but it is masked by overlying fields,---that is all.
+Let any one of them suffer any change at all, and the
+effect of it would be felt throughout the whole space
+the field would occupy if there were no other one in
+its neighborhood.
+
+Now, when the form of a magnet is changed, it
+changes the form of the magnetic field---that is, the
+distribution of the stress that constitutes the field; and,
+when an atomic magnet vibrates, it is changing its
+form; and as a result its field is changing at the same
+rate. A multitude of such independent magnets, all
+changing their forms and fields, would be sending out
+waves into the ether; but they would be caused by and
+measured by their heat motions, not by their magnetic
+condition simply; and the effects of these waves at a
+distance from their source would be practical uniformity
+unless the waves were very long. For such short ones
+as are produced by atomic and molecular vibrations
+\DPPageSep{268.png}{254}%
+there could be no ordinary indications of a magnetic
+field such as are exhibited in the movements of bodies
+of visible magnitude. Long waves of precisely the
+same sort caused by motions of a slower rate might
+make magnetic needles move. Thus, magnetic needles
+upon the earth have been observed to move at the
+same instant that solar disturbances have been witnessed
+through a telescope, which indicates that the
+waves were long ones, giving a magnet time to move
+one way before it was impelled to move in some other
+way.
+
+This condition of practical neutrality on account of
+the rapidity of the change at a distance from the magnetic
+body would not hold true in close proximity to
+the body itself; for the changes in the field will not
+only be actually greater there, but the fact that there
+are nodes and loops necessitates changes in the stress
+at the surface of the atom, and renders it possible for
+the actual magnetism to assert itself and act upon
+another very near to it which it cannot have in any
+degree a little farther away, the actual distance being
+comparable with the diameter of the atom itself. Hence,
+atoms close by would have certain magnetic effects
+upon each other in the nature of selective effects, on
+account of the uniformity of the stress at the nodes,
+and the number of nodes would determine the possible
+number of cohesive attachments. So one may fairly
+presume that the vibratory motions such as constitute
+the heat motions of atoms are the physical conditions
+that underlie chemical combinations and give to them
+their quantitative character, their selective property,
+\DPPageSep{269.png}{255}%
+\index{Sound, origin of}%
+and their symmetrical form into which they arrange
+themselves.
+
+This gives a rational account of so-called chemical
+attraction, and makes it clear how the laws of thermo-dynamics
+are related to chemical re-actions. It reduces
+the whole scheme to one of the mechanics of vibrating
+magnets; and the evidence that atoms are such magnets
+does not rest upon the necessity of the conception for
+the hypothesis, but upon much confirmatory experiment
+that has led physicists to the conclusion that
+they are such, in a manner quite independent of what
+phenomena might be deducible from matter with such
+a constitution. In conclusion, it may be added that,
+although the idea of ring-formed atoms has been
+adhered to in this explanation, it is not to be understood
+that the same explanation would not apply to
+atoms constituted in any other manner; for all that is
+implied in the above is that whatever their form and
+substance they are magnets, and that they are so elastic
+as to be capable of internal vibratory movements---that
+is, of changing their forms in a periodic way;
+and of this there appears to be no reasonable doubt.
+When several such are combined together the resultant
+motions and their effects become very complicated, and
+therefore difficult to disentangle; but that would be no
+reason for not holding a well-grounded conviction that
+all chemical phenomena are truly physical, and referable
+to fundamental mechanical laws, and are fully explained
+when these mechanical conditions are pointed out.
+%\DPPageSep{270.png}{256}%
+
+
+\Chapter{X}{Sound}{256}
+
+\First{The} term ``sound'' has two very different sign\-i\-fi\-ca\-tions,---one
+a physiological one referring to a sensation
+in the organ of hearing, the other the physical cause of
+the sensation. When one has the sensation of sound,
+of course he usually infers that it was caused by some
+external physical condition that has in some way impressed
+itself upon his auditory apparatus; and, to one
+who has thought but little about it, it is difficult to get
+rid of the idea that sound is a something which exists,
+whether it be heard or not. That is, there would still
+be sound though there were no ears, that a tumbling
+pile of books in a deserted house would make a racket
+if no one did hear it. On the other hand, one may
+call that sound which is capable of being heard; and
+when those conditions are investigated it is found, in
+all cases, to be some kind of a mechanical impulse, or
+succession of impulses, generally in the air, which may
+be traced from the ear to some body which is found to
+be in a state of vibration. The latter is called a
+sounding body, and the air is called a sound conductor;
+but these conditions are not necessary for the
+sensation of sound. One may not infrequently hear
+what is called ringing in the ears, that has its origin
+within the head, and, perhaps, in some cases independent
+\DPPageSep{271.png}{257}%
+\index{Pitch}%
+of any of the auditory apparatus, like some
+nerve disturbance even at the base of the brain itself.
+Hence there is a distinction between hearing and the
+cause of hearing, and the latter does not necessarily
+imply anything external to the listener. One may be
+deaf so that no conditions external or internal will
+produce the sensation. As the sensation itself can
+give no infallible testimony as to what causes it, it has
+come about that the physical conditions which may be
+heard as sound have been investigated, and the science
+of sound, or acoustics, has been developed quite independent
+of the sense of hearing, the latter being only
+a convenient instrumentality in the investigation, not
+an indispensable one. In this sense sound is the
+science of the vibratory movements of elastic bodies,
+and one may inquire first as to the origin of such
+movements. When one body strikes upon another,
+motion is imparted to the latter. If enough motion is
+imparted, it may move visibly, and we then call such
+motion mechanical. Though it does not visibly move,
+yet energy has been spent upon it in some degree, and
+must be represented by some degree of motion which
+at first it did not have. If a pencil be struck upon the
+table, one may be as sure that energy has been spent
+upon it as if it had been struck with the fist, only
+less in amount.
+
+When molecules are compressed together so as to
+increase the density, and retained in such closer compactness,
+heat is always the result; that is, the molecules
+themselves have their amplitude of vibration
+increased: but when molecules are compressed quickly,
+\DPPageSep{272.png}{258}%
+and the pressure be as quickly removed, the compressed
+molecules at once rebound to their original
+position with a velocity that depends upon the degree
+of elasticity the body has, and, like a swinging pendulum,
+do not stop at once when they have reached that
+position, but go beyond a little, and thus oscillate back
+and forth. Each molecule pushes against its neighbors,
+and they upon theirs, and so on, the motion travelling
+outwards from the point of disturbance in every direction,
+with a velocity that is proportionate to the temperature;
+that is, the vibratory rate of the molecules
+themselves, which, as pointed out in the chapter on
+heat, is exceedingly great.
+
+This particular kind of movement is called longitudinal;
+that is, it is to and fro in the direction in
+which the disturbance travels, and depends altogether
+upon the properties of the body that is struck, and not in
+any degree upon the initiating cause. When the table
+is struck with the pencil the sound heard is different in
+quality from that given out by a similar stroke upon
+the window or a tumbler. It differs also in duration.
+The latter may continue to be heard for some seconds,
+while the former is brief. Every elastic body has some
+particular vibratory rate, which depends upon its size
+and shape as well as the material it is composed of.
+A stretched string or wire, a board, a lath, a bridge,
+a house, for examples, all have individual rates of
+motion, into which they can be brought by some well-directed,
+sudden push. When a strong wind shakes a
+house, the shake is the vibratory rate of the building,
+and may be as low as one or two per second. In
+\DPPageSep{273.png}{259}%
+general, as bodies are smaller their rate of vibration
+increases, until it becomes greater than thirty or forty
+per second, when the effect can be heard. Stones
+have an individual pitch, or rate of vibration, so that
+by selection one may get a set to represent the musical
+scale when struck. Smooth bits of laths of different
+lengths give out their pitch when dropped upon
+a table; and, with a properly graded set, tunes may be
+played by dropping them successively. The rate of
+vibration, or pitch, of a table is relatively high---several
+hundred per second; and a pencil knock distributed
+over so large a body, and by it to the floor, reduces its
+strength very fast. The tumbler has its motions
+symmetrical, therefore of greater amplitude, and last
+longer. A tuning-fork struck and held in the fingers
+near the ear will be heard for a much longer time than
+if the stem be held against the table, as any one may
+satisfy himself by trying. In the latter case the
+motions are conducted away freely, in the former case
+not so freely. In the former case the sound appears
+louder to the ear, because the air, in contact with the
+vibrating table, receives vibratory motions from it as
+well as directly from the fork; and so the air motions
+are re-enforced, and the energy is dissipated so much
+the more rapidly.
+
+The idea in all this is that, so far as sound consists
+in vibratory motions, energy is involved, and is distributed
+in accordance with mechanical laws; the size,
+density, and elasticity of the sounding body being the
+factors which determine the rate at which the distribution
+can go on.
+\DPPageSep{274.png}{260}%
+\index{Sound, characteristics}%
+
+If the motion be properly mechanical, any agency
+that can originate such motions can give rise to sound.
+One might ask himself here if it be likely that any
+kind of motion, or form of energy, cannot produce it.
+If it be remembered that motion is the antecedent of
+motion in all known cases, one will perceive that
+sound might have a variety of antecedents, as it has.
+To the mechanical ones alluded to might be added
+all cases of percussion, impact, friction---indeed, the
+whole range of mechanical motions. Any agency that
+can change the form of a body can cause sound vibrations.
+
+That heat can directly produce sound is shown by
+the roar of fire in furnaces; and tubes having a burning
+gas-jet in them may give out a loud sound. In
+these cases it is the body of air that is caused to
+vibrate energetically\DPtypo{}{.}
+
+When a beam of light falls upon a body that can be
+heated by it there is a re-action between the surface and
+the air, in which the surface is pushed slightly backwards,
+as indicated by the \DPtypo{radiometre}{radiometer}. If a beam is
+allowed to fall intermittently upon such a surface, it
+will be thrown into vibrations as if it had been struck,
+and will give out a sound, the pitch of which depends
+upon the number of interruptions per second. Such a
+device is called a radiophone.
+
+A current of electricity sent through a conductor in
+an interrupted manner makes the wire give out a sound.
+The current heats the wire, expands it slightly, and
+cools as suddenly when the current is stopped; so the
+succession of currents results in sound. In like \DPtypo{manmer}{manner},
+\DPPageSep{275.png}{261}%
+\index{Sound, range of}%
+\index{Sound, velocity of}%
+a current of electricity going through an electro-magnet
+causes a click at the instant of making and
+breaking the current. This is occasioned by the
+change in position of all the molecules. A succession
+of these may keep up a continuous hum.
+
+The electric spark itself always produces a snap of
+brief duration, for short sparks from induction coils
+and electric machines; but, when the spark is a long
+one, like a flash of lightning, the sound may be prolonged
+several seconds. Along the line of the flash
+the air is greatly heated for a very brief time, and it
+therefore rapidly expands. The quick cooling produces
+a collapse of the heated column of air, with the consequent
+noise. The duration of the thunder does not
+signify that the lightning lasts such an appreciable
+time, but that a part of it was a distance away, and that
+time was taken for the sound to come from the more
+distant place.
+
+That chemical action can give rise to sound is proved
+by the explosion of gunpowder and other explosives,
+solid and liquid. In these cases a large amount of gas
+is suddenly formed, and at a high temperature; it displaces
+the air quickly and forms a great wave. One
+may often feel the wave of compression produced by
+a cannon go by him, even at the distance of several
+hundred feet from it. These examples show that heat,
+light, electricity, magnetism, and chemism are directly
+related to mechanical motions because competent to
+produce them under appropriate conditions. If motion
+be the antecedent of any given motion, and any of
+these may be the immediate antecedent of mechanical
+\DPPageSep{276.png}{262}%
+motions such as sound, what shall be said as to the
+nature of each of these physical agencies?
+
+\Section{CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND.}
+
+As sounds may be produced by any of the physical
+agencies, it does not matter, except for convenience,
+what ones are adopted. Usually mechanical motions
+are most convenient, and for musical purposes either
+percussion, or currents of air. We speak of high
+sounds and low sounds, and we find by experiment that
+those called low are produced by fewer vibrations per
+second than those called high. If sounds are considered
+as vibratory movements, then it is evident there is
+practically an infinite range of them; for there may be
+any rate, from one a year or a thousand years all the
+way to such vibrations as atoms make, measured by
+millions of millions per second. There is no good reason
+for drawing a boundary-line at one point rather
+than at another, and saying that all vibratory movements
+beyond this rate are not to be considered as
+sound, yet it is convenient for some purposes to confine
+the range to such as can be heard.
+
+When a succession of impulses follow each other at
+such a rate as just to produce a continuous sensation of
+sound, it is found to require from twenty to thirty per
+second. It differs very much in individuals. In the
+young it requires more, as the organ of hearing acts
+more promptly than it does in the old. A less number
+than these is heard as a tremble. From this as a minimum
+one may go through a series, running from the
+lowest sound produced by a piano---about forty per second---to
+\DPPageSep{277.png}{263}%
+\index{Echo}%
+\index{Wave lengths of sound}%
+the highest one of about $4,000$ per second.
+Many insects make much higher sounds than this.
+Such differences in the rate of vibration are called differences
+in pitch; and, for musical purposes, a standard
+of pitch has been adopted, making the middle~C of
+the piano give from
+%*[Illustration: ]
+\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{1.25in}
+ \Graphic{1.25in}{277a}
+ \Caption{33}{Diag.\ 33.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+$256$~to~$261$ vibrations.
+The pitch of a sound may be
+specified by giving its vibratory rate.
+The pitch of men's voices ranges
+from $100$~to~$150$ vibrations in conversation. Ordinary
+whistling is produced by from $1,000$ to~$3,000$ or~$4,000$.
+The squeak of bats is in the neighborhood of~$5,000$.
+Beyond these figures it is difficult to hear anything,---not
+because the vibratory motions are not produced, but
+because they have too little energy to affect the ear.
+Occasionally aurists find abnormally sensitive ears capable
+of hearing sounds with a pitch as high as fifty or
+sixty thousand, but ordinary persons have a limit in
+the neighborhood of $20,000$; so it is customary to say
+that the range of hearing of mankind is from thirty
+per second to about $25,000$: but it should always be borne
+in mind that the chief reason for not having a greater
+range is in the difficulty of giving sufficient amplitude
+to such very rapid changes. As the pitch rises the
+amplitude decreases for a given amount of vibratory
+energy. One might attribute the relatively low vibratory
+rate of the maximum which the ear can perceive
+to the lack of delicacy of the apparatus itself, which
+would be true enough in an absolute sense; but the actual
+sensitivity of the ear is really something wonderful,
+for a piece of apparatus that is altogether mechanical
+\DPPageSep{278.png}{264}%
+in its mode of operation. It has been found that the
+ear can hear such sounds as are produced by small
+whistles at the distance of several hundred feet; and, if
+the amplitude be computed,---assuming that it varies
+inversely as the square of the distance---it is found to
+be comparable with the diameter of a molecule, or less
+than the ten-millionth of an inch. One who understands
+the necessity for vibratory motions in elastic
+matter will readily conclude that between the highest
+number the ear can perceive, say $50,000$ per second,
+and the lowest rate capable of affecting the eye ($400$
+millions of millions), there is an enormous gap; and man
+has no organs for perceiving the intermediate ones.
+
+Experiments made in various ways have shown that
+the velocity of sound waves in air is about eleven hundred
+feet per second, and varies with the temperature,
+being only $1,090$~feet at the freezing point of water,
+increasing or diminishing about two feet per second for
+each degree above or below that; and this is true for
+sounds of all degrees of pitch. If it were not so,
+music could not be heard at any distance from its
+source. Suppose a tuning-fork makes one hundred
+vibrations in a second. At the end of the second the
+first wave would have got say eleven hundred feet
+away, while the last wave would have just been completed;
+or between the fork and the more distant wave
+there would be a series, one hundred in all, reaching
+eleven hundred feet. It follows that each wave would
+be eleven feet long, or the velocity of transmission
+divided by the number of vibrations. The wave length
+of sounds can be measured in several ways, and of
+\DPPageSep{279.png}{265}%
+\index{Vibrations, sympathetic}%
+\index{Vibrations, forced}%
+course the product of the wave length into the number
+of vibrations gives the velocity of sound in any conductor.
+An idea of the actual wave length for common
+sounds may be had thus: If the middle C of the piano
+makes $261$ vibrations per second, and the velocity in
+the air of the room be $1,140$ feet, $\dfrac{1140}{261} = 4.36\text{ feet}$,
+as the length of the air wave, and for a man's voice it
+will be about $\dfrac{1140}{125} = 9.1\text{ feet}$, while the highest note
+on a piano will be $\dfrac{1140}{4000} = .285\text{ foot}$, or $3.4\text{ inches}$. In
+water the velocity is four times greater than in air, in
+wood about twelve times, and in steel about sixteen
+times greater; and this will give a corresponding increase
+in the wave length. This velocity of sound in
+air is, roughly, about a mile in five seconds, or twelve
+miles a minute; and at this rate nearly a day and a
+half would be needed to go round the earth.
+
+Air waves, like water waves, are reflected when they
+come against a more solid body. Such reflections of
+air waves are called echoes. The mere fact of reflection
+does not change the length of the wave, as the
+pitch of a sound is not altered by having its direction
+changed. The law of sound reflection is the same as
+that for the reflection of energy in general; viz., the
+angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence.
+Neither does reflection change the velocity of sound
+waves.
+
+The phenomena of echoes are familiar to every one,
+for walls, houses, wood, and hills all echo sounds; and
+one may roughly determine the distance to such an
+\DPPageSep{280.png}{266}%
+\index{Musical sounds}%
+echoing surface. As one approaches such surface the
+time between producing a sound and its return is
+shortened, until, when about sixty feet from it, the two
+so blend that the echo is no longer heard with distinctness.
+The sound has then travelled $120$~feet.
+
+When sounds are produced at the ends of tubes the
+walls of the tube prevent, by reflection, the scattering
+of the waves, and the whole motion is kept in nearly
+parallel lines, and with slight loss in strength; hence the
+utility of speaking-tubes. If the tube be a short one,
+and stopped at one end, a new phenomenon appears
+for sounds having a wave length about four times the
+length of the tube. The sound is much strengthened.
+A tuning-fork making say $435$~vibrations per second will
+have a wave length of about thirty-one inches. If it be
+held while it is vibrating over a tube or vessel of any
+sort, between seven and eight inches deep, the increase
+in the strength of the sound will be very marked. The
+motion in the air is so much swifter than the prongs of
+the fork that, while one prong is beating downwards
+and thus producing a condensation in the air, the wave
+reaches the bottom of the tube; there it is reflected, and
+gets to the top just as the prong of the fork has returned
+to its normal position. As the fork continues
+upward, forming a rarefaction, the rarefaction also
+travels down the tube, and is reflected so as to get
+back when the prong has returned to its normal position;
+so for a complete vibration of the fork the air
+wave has travelled four times the length of the tube.
+It is possible in this way to make quite accurate measurements
+of either the wave length of a sound, its
+\DPPageSep{281.png}{267}%
+\index{Musical ratios}%
+\index{Noise}%
+velocity, or the number of vibrations a sounding body
+makes per second. This phenomenon is called resonance;
+and it is the chief factor in wind musical instruments,
+such as flutes, organ-pipes, and the like.
+Resonance in general means the ability of a body to be
+thrown into sound vibrations by sound waves, and there
+are two well-marked cases that need to be considered.
+When the stem of a vibrating tuning-fork is held upon
+a table the sound in the air is much louder, for the
+whole table is made to vibrate at the same rate as the
+fork. The table will resound loudly to forks of any
+pitch. Such vibrations as are different in pitch from
+that belonging to the body itself are called \emph{forced} vibrations.
+Resonance of this sort is the function of the
+sounding-boards of pianos, the bodies of violins, guitars,
+and other similar instruments.
+
+If two tuning-forks have the same pitch, and one of
+them be made to sound, the other one will presently be
+made to sound also, though it be several feet away from
+the former one. The air waves act upon it like a
+pusher upon one swinging; at each return a little more
+energy is added, until the amplitude has become great
+enough to make the sound audible. Such vibrations
+are called \emph{sympathetic}, for they are only effective upon
+bodies whose own rate of vibration is the same as that
+of the sounding body. Raise the damper to the piano
+and sing a sound of any particular note, then listen.
+The same note will be heard prolonged by the piano.
+The particular string which can give that pitch of sound
+has been thrown into similar vibrations, and continues
+to sound as it would if caused to in any other way.
+\DPPageSep{282.png}{268}%
+
+The air as a body is too large to have a vibratory
+rate of its own, and, consequently, all sounds in it are
+properly called forced vibrations; but, when it is confined
+in cavities, resonance becomes apparent, and
+sympathetic vibrations may be so strong as to be deafening.
+That is the case often in locomotive furnace-flues
+when the door is opened. One may hear it a mile
+or two. The resonance of large rooms sometimes
+renders it very difficult to understand a speaker in
+them.
+
+The prolonged sound of thunder has been often explained
+as due in some measure to echo from the clouds,
+but it is doubtful whether clouds do echo sounds. No
+one ever hears the sounds of bells, whistles, or cannon,
+or other strong sounds, coming from the clouds, as
+would be the case if they reflected sounds appreciably.
+
+When a single key of a piano is struck, there is produced
+what is called a musical sound. There is a definite
+pitch that is maintained. Strike half a dozen
+adjacent keys at once, and the effect is what is called
+a noise, though each component by itself would give a
+pleasing sound. A load of stones when tipped from
+a cart makes a great racket; yet each stone, if struck
+with a hammer, may give out a distinct musical sound.
+Nearly every body has its own musical pitch; but, if a
+number of bodies with different unrelated pitches are
+listened to at once, the effect upon the ear is a discordant
+one, and is called a noise.
+
+When, however, two or more musical sounds whose
+pitches stand in a simple ratio to each other are heard
+together, they blend so as to form a pleasing combinational
+\DPPageSep{283.png}{269}%
+\index{Musical instruments}%
+sound. Thus, if one makes twice as many vibrations
+per second as the other, the sound is a very
+smooth musical one, and one is said to be the octave of
+the other. If middle C of the piano makes $261$~vibrations,
+the octave above will make~$522$, and the octave
+below~$130.5$; and these may all be heard at once as a
+musical sound. In music an octave is divided up into
+eight parts called tones; and these are sung as \emph{do}, \emph{re},
+\emph{mi}, and so on. If a string be stretched between two
+points and the distance measured, the sound it will
+produce may be called \emph{do} of the scale. If the string
+be now shortened by a bridge so as to produce the note
+\emph{re}, and the length of the string be again measured, its
+length will be found to be eight-ninths of the length
+of the first, the note \emph{mi} will be four-fifths, \emph{fa} three-fourths,
+\emph{sol} two-thirds, \emph{la} three-fifths, \emph{si} eight-fifteenths,
+and the next \emph{do} one-half. As the number of vibrations
+a stretched string will make is inversely as its length,
+it follows that these fractions inverted will represent
+the relative number of vibrations produced by each
+member of the musical scale when compared with the
+beginning or fundamental one. The following shows
+the letters of the musical scale, with their ratios and
+vibration numbers for the middle octave of the piano.
+
+\begin{center}
+\TableFont%
+\begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
+C & D & E & F & G & A & B & C \\[1ex]
+& $\dfrac{9}{8}$ & $\dfrac{5}{4}$ & $\dfrac{4}{3}$ & $\dfrac{3}{2}$ & $\dfrac{5}{3}$ & $\dfrac{15}{8}$ & $\dfrac{2}{1}$ \\[2ex]
+261 & 293.62 & 326.25 & 348 & 391.5 & 435 & 489.37 & 522
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The meaning of this is that $\dfrac{9}{8}×261 = 293.62$, and
+so on, so that the notes of the musical scale stand in
+\DPPageSep{284.png}{270}%
+\index{Sound, vocal}%
+\index{Voice}%
+simple ratios to each other; and, if one has the vibration
+rate of any one of them, he can compute any
+others. Of course any octave above this one will have
+simple multiples of these numbers for their vibration
+numbers.
+
+But these numbers signify more than simply this:
+they signify that, when a second one is sounding with
+C, it will make the number of vibrations represented by
+the numerator of the fraction; while C is making the
+number indicated by the denominator. Thus, G makes
+three vibrations while C makes two. The sounds are
+concordant one-third of the time, and the effect is a
+pleasing tone. On the other hand, D makes nine while
+C makes eight, and the two are in accord but one-eighth
+of the time; and the effect is displeasing, and is called
+discordant. The smaller the ratio the more musical
+and harmonious the sounds; and music is made up of a
+succession of sounds standing in such relations to each
+other, and, when different ratios are employed, it is only
+for contrast, and return is quickly made to these ratios.
+The ear will not long tolerate a departure from them.
+
+It has been stated that sympathetic vibrations would
+cause a given body to vibrate. Press down gently a
+base C on a piano, so as not to make it sound. Now
+strike the C above it, holding down the key for a second
+or two. On letting up the latter the sound of the
+latter will continue to be heard, but coming from the
+lower key, as can be learned by letting up the key, when
+it will cease to be heard. If the G above the struck C
+be now struck with the same low C held down, the
+sound of the G will be heard from the base string, and
+\DPPageSep{285.png}{271}%
+so one may go up, finding eight or ten strings, each one
+of which will make the low C string vibrate, giving out
+the sound of the higher string. It is found that each
+one of the strings able to do this has a vibration number
+which is a simple multiple of the lowest one. The first
+one is the octave, making twice the number; the second
+one is the fifth of that octave, making three times the
+number; and so on, to the upper limit of the piano.
+
+This means that a piano string is capable of vibrating
+in a number of rates,---two, three, four, and so on, times
+its own lowest rate, which is always called its pitch.
+It is also found that this process is reversible; that is,
+if each one of these keys in turn be held down and the
+lowest one struck, they will each be set vibrating; and
+this shows that the struck string vibrates itself in the
+several different pitches represented by the multiples
+of its fundamental rate. The sound of a piano string is
+therefore a compound sound. In such a compound
+sound the lowest one is called the fundamental, and the
+others the over-tones, or harmonics. Some of these
+harmonic sounds are likely to be stronger than others;
+and some may even be so much more energetic than
+the fundamental as to nearly drown the latter, so as to
+make the pitch of the string to appear an octave or
+more higher than it really is. The number and relative
+strength of the harmonics in a compound sound make
+the difference in the quality of sounds. In all such
+instruments as pianos, violins, guitars, and the like
+string instruments, the number and strength of the
+over-tones depend in a large measure upon how and
+where the strings are struck and made to sound. A
+\DPPageSep{286.png}{272}%
+\index{Ear}%
+piano string plucked near its middle point gives a different
+sound from what it will give if plucked near one
+end, and different in each case if plucked by the fingernail
+and by the finger. So the quality of sound can be
+much modified by mechanically varying these factors.
+
+In other musical instruments the sounds are also
+compound in a similar way, differing in the number and
+strength of the higher harmonics. Some have the
+even harmonics, as the second, fourth, sixth, and so on,
+stronger; some have the odd ones---first, third, fifth,
+etc.---stronger; some have few, and some many. A
+flute has but one or two, a violin has twenty; and thus
+the character of the sounds of musical instruments is
+explained.
+
+As for the voice, the sound is produced by the vibrations
+of what are called the vocal chords, which are
+fixed at the junction of the trachea and æsophagus, and
+through which all the air to and from the lungs has to
+go. These chords are modified in tension by muscles
+at will, and so change the pitch of the vibrations. The
+cavities of the throat, the mouth, and nose act as resonators
+for these sounds and seem to strengthen some
+of the constituents, thus giving prominence to certain
+ones to the exclusion of others. That the mouth acts
+this way may be observed by pursing the lips as if to
+produce the various sounds of ah, oo, o, snapping one
+cheek with the finger. These sounds will result;
+while, with a little trial, one may thus snap a tune
+which may be heard through a room, merely altering
+the size of the mouth cavity. The cavity of the nose
+is as important as that of the mouth. When this cavity
+\DPPageSep{287.png}{273}%
+\index{Corti's fibres}%
+\index{Fibres of Corti}%
+is small and narrow, there is produced what is called
+a nasal sound. When this is prominent, and is not the
+result of a cold, as is sometimes the case, the trouble
+is a physiological one, due to the bad shape of the
+resonating cavities rather than to careless habits, as is
+often assumed by some teachers of expression. Some
+different pitch of the voice in ordinary speaking might
+be adopted, and thus in some measure prevent the disagreeableness
+of the nasal sounds, but no amount of
+painstaking can altogether prevent it. That structure
+and its acoustic effects are an inheritance in some parts
+of the world, as are crooked noses, thick lips, black
+eyes, and broad heads in other and different parts of
+the world, and is no more to be legislated away than
+are these other physiological peculiarities. Neither is
+it a proper subject of ridicule, more than lameness or
+defective vision.
+
+If the bell of a locomotive be rung while it is swiftly
+approaching one, the pitch of the sound rises until the
+engine has reached the observer. As it retreats the
+pitch lowers, and the difference in pitch becomes
+greater as the velocity of the engine is greater. The
+explanation of the phenomenon is, that one judges of
+the pitch of a sound by the number of vibrations that
+reach the ear per second. Suppose an observer be
+distant eleven hundred feet from a source of sound of
+one hundred vibrations per second. If both observer
+and source remained in place, one hundred vibrations
+per second would reach the ear of the observer, and
+there would be one hundred more on the way to his
+ear. If the observer should continue to go that whole
+\DPPageSep{288.png}{274}%
+distance of eleven hundred feet to the source of the
+sound in one second, he would not only receive all he
+would by standing still, but in addition all that were
+on the way to him,---two hundred vibrations in all,---or
+just twice the number that would reach him if he
+remained in place. Now, twice a given number of
+vibrations represents a difference in pitch of an octave.
+The sound he would hear would be an octave higher
+than the sounding body was actually making. Any
+less velocity than that supposed would make a corresponding
+less difference in pitch, but such velocities as
+railway trains have may make a difference in the pitch
+of more than a musical tone. Of course, if the sounding
+body and listener be separating, a less number of
+vibrations will reach his ear, and the pitch will be correspondingly
+lowered. One may roughly determine
+the velocity of a train of cars by noting the change in
+pitch of bell or whistle. Thus, if the difference be,
+say a musical semitone,---one-sixteenth,---then the
+speed of the train is one-sixteenth the velocity of sound
+in air, one-sixteenth of $1,125$~feet, which gives seventy\DPtypo{-}{ }feet
+per second, or forty-seven miles an hour.
+
+The ear is a complicated structure of tubes, muscles,
+cartilages, bones, fibres, and nerves. The external
+part, or conch, is of but little service in hearing in man,
+for it cannot be directed, as can the ears of horses and
+cattle. If it stands out from the head so as to have
+some use as a collector, it is supposed to be in abnormal
+position; but it is not much needed in any case.
+The orifice of the ear is known as the tympanum, a
+tube a little over an inch in depth and about a quarter
+\DPPageSep{289.png}{275}%
+\index{Life}%
+of an inch in diameter. At the inner end it is covered
+with a thin membrane called the drum of the ear. On
+the inner side of this membrane, there is attached to
+the middle of it a bone fixed to a kind of hinge, so that
+any movement of the drum of the ear, in or out, makes
+this bone to move in a similar way. Then follows a
+network of bones and cartilages, and a set of fibres
+known as Corti's, of different lengths, and whose function
+has been supposed to be for sympathetic vibrations.
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{3.5in}{289a}
+ \end{center}
+ \Caption{34}{Diag.\ 34.---The Ear.}
+\end{figure}
+There are in the neighborhood of $4,000$ of these
+fibres, each one adapted to vibrate at a different pitch.
+Then follow the nerve terminals and the acoustic
+nerve itself, which goes to the base of the brain, where
+its function as an acoustic instrument ends with the
+delivery of its peculiar motions, interpreted by consciousness
+as sound.
+
+It is easily seen that the whole structure is one
+adapted to receive vibratory motions from the air,
+within prescribed limits, and transmit them inwards
+\DPPageSep{290.png}{276}%
+\index{Life, definitions of}%
+where they can be interpreted. The tube itself possesses
+resonating properties like any other tube. The
+membrane is shaken to and fro by sound vibrations,
+and this movement is handed on to each distinct part
+until the nerve itself is shaken. From beginning to
+end, it is only the transfer of a particular kind of
+motion,---what is called mechanical,---perhaps transforming
+it from longitudinal to transverse vibrations.
+That it is so extremely sensitive as to be affected appreciably
+by motions so slight as the ten-millionth of an
+inch is a marvel, and shows that mechanical motions of
+translation, though on a scale of molecular magnitudes,
+is able, through the proper avenue, to affect the mind
+and develop consciousness, which experience enables
+the individual to interpret by direct inference.
+
+Let one reflect upon the facts furnished in great
+abundance by physical science,---that all the data which
+comes to the mind through consciousness, and which
+furnishes what is called experience, is simply motion
+of some sort. Touch, producing pressure upon the
+surface of the body, finds a suitable nerve to transmit
+to the base of the brain that kind of a disturbance;
+sight, another kind of disturbance to the optic nerve,
+transmitted to the same place; hearing, still another
+kind of motion given to another kind of nerve running
+to the same headquarters. So, by means of motions
+of various sorts man determines his place in the
+universe, and learns how he may adjust himself to it.
+%\DPPageSep{291.png}{277}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XI}{Life}{277}
+
+\First{Any} scheme of physics which fails to present that
+great body of physical phenomena exhibited by living
+things, both vegetable and animal, must be incomplete.
+Many of these phenomena have seemed to be so remote
+from ordinary mechanical operations that, in the
+absence of definite knowledge concerning them, their
+origin, factors, and relations to subsequent phenomena,
+it is not to be wondered at that they were long thought to
+be due to some peculiar force residing in a living thing,
+\index{Force, vital}%
+\index{Vital force}%
+\Pagelabel{277}% [** PP: Note to p. 277 clearly points here]
+\Pagelabel{279}%
+which was not to be attributed to the general endowments
+of matter, but only to be found in certain organized
+forms of matter, which organization it had itself
+built up as a \emph{habitat}. It was conceived to exist apart
+from any material organization as a kind of entity.
+The difference between a living and a dead animal was
+thought to be simply one of the presence or absence
+of that entity called life. It was thought to be able to
+effect changes in matter which the ordinary physical
+and chemical forces could not possibly do; and many
+of the chemical products of living things were supposed
+to be formed only through its agency; and still
+more than that: it was held to be capable of ``suspending
+the action of chemical laws.'' That the stomach
+\DPPageSep{292.png}{278}%
+\index{Cell structure}%
+\index{Protoplasm}%
+itself was not digested by the gastric juice it secreted
+was held to be proof of its control over chemical
+operations.
+
+There have been many attempts to define life, but
+the efforts have not been very successful. Thus Kant
+defines it as ``an internal principle of action;'' Treviranus,
+``the constant uniformity of phenomena under
+diversity of external influences.'' Bichat, ``Life is the
+sum of the functions by which death is resisted.''
+Duges calls life ``the special activity of organized
+beings.'' De~Blainville's and Compte's definition runs
+thus: ``Life is the twofold internal movement of composition
+and decomposition, at once general and continuous;''
+and Spencer's is ``the continuous adjustment
+of internal relations to external relations.'' It will be
+observed that in all of these what is described is a
+series of processes, or a body of functions belonging to
+certain structures, rather than an entity,---a description
+of what life does rather than what it is.
+
+Analogous difficulties were met in the attempts to
+define other of the so-called physical forces. Thus
+light was supposed to be a created something. The
+corpuscular theory of it represented it as consisting
+of particles of some sort that ordinary matter could
+absorb and eject, and which, therefore, had an existence
+independent of matter. The establishment of its
+being but wave motion in the ether completely destroyed
+the notion of its having an objective, independent
+existence.
+
+Heat, too, was supposed to be a kind of imponderable
+matter, and certain phenomena in ordinary matter
+\DPPageSep{293.png}{279}%
+\index{Molecular stability}%
+depended upon its presence or absence; it, therefore,
+was supposed to be an entity, and to have an independent
+existence. Experiment showed it to be but a
+particular kind of motion, so the idea that there was
+any such thing as heat was abandoned.
+
+Electricity and magnetism were supposed to be
+fluids; and some of the early terminology still survives
+in popular speech to-day, as when one reads that the
+electric fluid struck a tree or entered a house. Nevertheless,
+nobody now believes that either of them is
+a fluid, or has an existence independent of matter.
+
+The regular movements of the planets were thought
+to require intelligent directive power to keep them in
+their orbits; but now the gravitative property of matter
+itself is held to be quite sufficient to account for all
+the observed facts, and the extra material directive
+force is held to be an entirely unnecessary assumption.
+
+The discovery of the conservation of energy, covering
+every field that has been investigated, led to the
+growing conviction that there are no special forces of
+any kind needed to explain any phenomena. What
+seemed probable forty years ago, to those who were
+conversant with the facts,---that vital force as an entity
+has no existence, and that all physiological phenomena
+whatever can be accounted for without going beyond
+the bounds of physical and chemical science,---has
+to-day become the general conclusion of all students of
+vital phenomena; and vital force as an entity has no
+advocates in the present generation of biologists.\footnote
+ {See Appendix, \Pageref{p.}{400}.}
+The
+term has completely disappeared from the science, and
+is only to be found in historical works; and every
+\DPPageSep{294.png}{280}%
+phenomenon which was once supposed to be due to it
+is now shown to be due to the physical properties of a
+particularly complex chemical substance known as protoplasm,
+which is the substance out of which all living
+things, animals and plants, are formed. This protoplasm
+is entirely structureless, homogeneous, and as
+undifferentiated as to parts as is a solution of starch,
+or the albumen of an egg. Minute portions of this
+elementary life-stuff possess all the distinctive fundamental
+properties that are to be seen in the largest
+and most complicated living structures. It has the
+power of \emph{assimilation},---that is, of organizing dead food
+into matter like itself,---and, consequently, what is
+called growth. It possesses the ability to move---that
+is, of visible, mechanical motion, which is technically
+called \emph{contractility}; and it possesses \emph{sensitivity}---that
+is, ability to respond to external conditions.
+
+It was formerly thought that the cell was the
+physiological unit, a cell having walls differently constituted
+from the substance enclosed, also a nucleus;
+but as the microscope was improved, and anatomical
+research continued, it became evident that the cell,
+with its more or less complicated structure, was itself
+built up by the structureless protoplasm. As before
+stated, it is a highly complex substance, chemically
+considered, made up of many atoms of carbon, hydrogen,
+oxygen, and nitrogen, with a small number of
+atoms of sulphur and phosphorus,---more than a thousand
+of them in one molecule; and there appears to be
+a great number of varieties of it. A small pellicle of
+this substance, like a minute bit of jelly, without any
+\DPPageSep{295.png}{281}%
+\index{Growth of crystals}%
+\index{Growth of lobster}%
+\index{Matter, living}%
+parts or organs, possesses its various attributes in equal
+degree in every part. Any particular portion can lay
+hold upon assimilable material, or digest it, or be used
+as a means of locomotion; so that what are called
+tissues of animals and plants are only the fundamental
+properties of the protoplasm out of which they have
+been built---thrown into prominence by a kind of division
+of labor. The protoplasm organizes itself into
+cells and tissues in the same sense as atoms organize
+themselves into molecules, and molecules into crystals
+of various sorts, having different properties, that depend
+upon the kind of atoms, their number and
+arrangement in the molecule.
+
+The greater the number of atoms in a molecule the
+less stability does it have, and especially is this the case
+with molecules containing nitrogen. Many of its compounds
+are so unstable as to be liable to explosive
+disruption. This fact makes it easy to understand how
+there exists, in a mass of such molecules no larger than
+the minute ones seen in the microscope, conditions for
+internal motions in the nature of explosions.
+
+Let it be granted that atoms are in the neighborhood
+of the fifty-millionth of an inch in diameter; then,
+if a thousand of them are organized into a molecule, its
+diameter would be about the five-millionth of an inch.
+A speck of protoplasm, one ten-thousandth of an inch
+in diameter, would require not less than five hundred
+such molecules in a row to span it; and there would be
+no less than one hundred and twenty-five millions of
+such molecules in the small mass. Some of these molecules
+would be less stable than others on account of
+\DPPageSep{296.png}{282}%
+\index{Food}%
+the internal motions that all the time are present.
+Physical disturbances, external to such a mass, such as
+temperature, ether waves of light, and chemical re-actions
+of any sort, and so on, can induce and add to the
+disruption and other changes going on, and visible motions
+might be expected to follow.
+
+That such external agencies can bring about visible
+motions of microscopic particles has long been known.
+A few small bits of camphor dropped upon the surface
+of clean water in a saucer will begin to move about in
+a remarkable way. They will spin round, and travel
+from place to place, and dodge each other in a manner
+strongly like living things. A little gamboge, which is
+a reddish-yellow gum used as a pigment, if rubbed up
+in water and looked at through a microscope, will be
+seen to have its particles in constant motion like animalcules.
+This is known as the Brownian movement,
+and is caused by temperature changes between the
+particles and the water. Such phenomena are rather
+extreme cases of the re-action of external molecular conditions
+upon a small mass of matter, resulting in mechanical
+motions. In protoplasm there is added to
+these same external ones others of the nature of molecular
+explosions within the mass, and together they
+give rise to a number of effects, in which the transformed
+energy shows itself in redistributing the molecules,
+absorbing additional material, and movements of
+other sorts.
+
+Biological researches within the past few years have
+added vastly to our knowledge of protoplasm and its
+properties; and there is no longer any question that its
+\DPPageSep{297.png}{unnumbered}%
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{figure}[hp]
+ \begin{center}
+ \Graphic{\linewidth}{297a}
+ \label{fig:frost}
+ \end{center}
+\begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
+\scriptsize%
+The above picture is copied from a photograph. It represents the plume-like
+forms assumed by water when crystallized in a basin. The similarity it presents
+to vegetable forms is very striking. One may often see on frosty window-panes
+fantastic imitations of organic things which forcibly suggest vitality. They are
+too common to be considered coincidences.
+\end{minipage}
+\end{figure}
+\DPPageSep{298.png}{283}%
+\index{Muscles}%
+qualities are the expression of the various movements,
+chemical and physical, and belong to it simply as a
+chemical substance. Chemists have synthetically
+formed out of the various elements a vast number of
+substances that were not long ago believed to be formed
+only by living things; and there is but little reason to
+doubt that, when they shall be able to form the substance
+protoplasm, it will possess all the properties it is now
+known to have, including what is called its life; and one
+ought not to be surprised at its announcement any day.
+
+Some of the phenomena exhibited by bodies called
+inorganic, such as minerals of many kinds, possess
+properties that are very like those supposed to belong
+solely to living things. A spider or a lobster will have
+a new leg or claw grow to replace one lost in any way.
+In like manner a crystal will replace a corner or side or
+any defacement so as to complete its symmetry before
+it will begin to grow elsewhere, and this in cases where
+the crystal has been defaced or incomplete for millions
+of years, as is found to be the case sometimes in geological
+specimens. Such phenomena have led some of
+the most thoughtful and best informed naturalists to
+query whether the evidence we have does not lend
+much support to the theory that \emph{matter itself is alive},
+and that the difference we observe in things is simply
+one of degree rather than of kind. See \hyperref[fig:frost]{opposite page}.
+
+In the brief space of this chapter, only an outline of
+the relations between vital and physical phenomena can
+be given, and of these, only a few of the more prominent
+ones. It will suffice to show that such phenomena
+as assimilation and growth, movement and irritability,
+\DPPageSep{299.png}{284}%
+or sensitivity, have antecedents of physical energy in
+the same sense as the movements of an electric motor
+have physical antecedents in electric currents, dynamos,
+steam-engine, and furnace.
+
+The food of an animal consists almost altogether in
+highly complex molecular compounds. It may be said to
+be matter stored with energy. A pound of bread may
+have the mechanical equivalent of twelve thousand heat
+units, and if burnt in an engine would be better for
+heating purposes than a pound of coal. When this has
+been digested, and has done its work in the body, the
+excreted products are of course equal in weight to the
+original pound, for no kind of a physical or chemical
+process affects the quantity of matter in any degree;
+but the products themselves represent much less complex
+compounds, and the energy has been distributed
+through the body, carrying on its various operations.
+There is, first, that of ordinary movement, which can be
+measured in foot-pounds, as work of any kind may be.
+The blood in the arteries and veins has to depend upon
+a kind of hydraulic apparatus to keep it in motion.
+The temperature of the body demands a supply of heat
+measurable in heat units to maintain it, while the
+repair and waste going on through the whole body of
+all animals implies a distribution of the material necessary
+for the maintenance of the integrity of the tissues,
+as well as a separation and removal of the used-up material;
+that is, the material that has lost all its available
+energy. The energy for doing all this of course comes
+from the food, so the question is not as to its source
+and quantity, but it is, How is this transformation of
+\DPPageSep{300.png}{288}%
+\index{Nerves, their functions}%
+energy in the body effected? Is it direct, or is it indirect?
+This is the same as asking as to the mechanism
+in the body, by means of which energy supplied is transformed
+to meet the various wants of the body.
+
+Roughly, there are five different kinds of motion to
+trace the antecedents of in the body of any of the
+higher animals. First, there is the common mechanical
+motions of the bony framework, which transport the
+body from one place to another, or change the position
+of a part with respect to the rest, as when one moves
+an arm. Second, there is the motion of a muscle,
+wholly different in character from the first, for the
+shape of the muscle changes by contracting in length
+and increasing in diameter. The muscles are so attached
+to the bones that the contractions of the one
+cause the others to change their positions. The muscular
+contractions of the heart, arteries, and veins keep
+the blood circulating; and the same is true for the processes
+of digestion, breathing, etc.
+
+Third, there is the motion constituting the temperature
+of the body, which, as has been explained, is altogether
+atomic and molecular in its nature, and is,
+therefore, in strong contrast with the other two.
+
+Fourth, there is a kind of motion that is going on
+throughout the body of the nature of transpiration, in
+which solids, liquids, and gases are passing through the
+various membranes without rupturing them. In the
+lungs there is an exchange of gases, oxygen going one
+way and carbonic acid gas going the other. In all the
+mucous-membrane-lined cavities there is more or less
+liquid oozing through the walls continuously, and there
+\DPPageSep{301.png}{286}%
+is no tissue so dense but protoplasmic masses do not
+move into or out of apparently with ease. They go
+through the walls of veins and arteries as if the latter
+were porous bodies, though no visible pores have ever
+been discovered in them.
+
+Fifth, there is the motion in the nerves, in the nature
+of a longitudinal wave, and the velocity of which is in
+the neighborhood of one hundred feet in a second,
+which, though it is slow compared with sound waves or
+light waves, is fast when compared with the other
+motions of the body. He is a swift runner who can
+run at the rate of thirty feet a second for any distance.
+
+The contraction of a muscle is to be measured in
+fractions of an inch per second. The motion of heat,
+measured as a rate of conduction, is exceedingly small
+in the animal body,---probably not the hundredth of an
+inch per second. The transpiration, or osmotic action,
+is also a relatively slow movement, so that a velocity of
+one hundred feet per second, which is upwards of a mile
+a minute, is really rapid.
+
+How and why the bone moves we know: it is because
+the muscle that is attached to it contracts; but how is
+energy spent to make a muscle contract? As a matter
+of fact, when a muscle contracts it evolves a considerable
+quantity of carbonic acid gas and water; it also
+becomes acid, all of which imply chemical actions, for
+these are chemical products. Carbonic acid gas and
+water are the chief products of the combustion of such
+material as foods, for they are made of what are called
+hydro-carbons (combinations of carbon, hydrogen, and
+oxygen chiefly); and when these elements re-combine,
+\DPPageSep{302.png}{287}%
+\index{Nerves, their functions}%
+forming water and carbonic acid, there is always a relatively
+large but definite amount of energy given out
+in the form of heat, and this effect is independent of
+time or place; that is, the same amount is developed
+whether the process goes on fast or slow, or whether it
+takes place in a furnace, in the body, or by slow decomposition
+called rotting. When it goes on faster than
+the heat can be conducted or radiated away, the temperature
+rises and we say the body is hot. When the heat
+generated is at once employed to do work, as in a steam-engine,
+the temperature of it is reduced proportional to
+the work done. When this takes place in a contracting
+muscle better results follow, for conduction and
+radiation within a muscle can take place at only a slow
+rate; so the temperature rises, and this explains the
+sensation of warmth resulting from muscular exercise.
+The increase in perspiration is also partly due to the
+same re-action of decomposition, as water is one of the
+products. When the muscle in contracting does additional
+work, as in raising a weight, a corresponding
+amount of decomposition takes place, and the heat is
+but transient, as it is at once transformed into the
+muscular motion, which is as much mechanical in its
+nature as is the movement in a steam-engine.
+
+The muscle is quite like a spiral spring, which may
+contract upon itself and do work by contracting.
+
+It is not the substance of the muscle itself that undergoes
+the change of disintegration, evolving water, carbonic
+acid, and other products; but there is evidence
+that the muscle secretes a particular substance called
+\emph{inogen}, the rapid decomposition of which causes the
+\DPPageSep{303.png}{288}%
+\index{Corn, life of}%
+\index{Egg}%
+contraction. As this substance can only be replaced at
+a definite rate and in a definite amount, it is clear that
+the work of a given muscle is limited by the physiological
+processes that precede it. The rate of work of a
+muscle is then determined by the rate at which inogen
+can be secreted by the muscle, and work done beyond
+that rate results in muscular exhaustion, which in its
+early stages is called weariness, and requires repose for
+fresh accumulation. Excessive draught upon the
+muscles reduces their ability to secret inogen, and their
+degeneration follows.
+
+Muscular contraction is satisfactorily accounted for
+without assuming any vital force. It has a purely
+physical origin, the structure itself acting as a kind of
+mechanism for transforming the chemical energy supplied
+in food into the mechanical forms of energy
+represented by the various movements of the body,
+external and internal, which have already been mentioned.
+
+That physical and chemical agencies bring about new
+movements is of course well understood. Especially
+clear is this for such nerve actions as accompany the
+special sensations of sound, sight, touch, and the rest.
+That the disturbance is properly described as a movement
+is apparent when it is found that it has a rate of
+progression, as before stated, of from one hundred to
+three feet per second. Whether such movement be
+similar to a sound wave in a rod or tube, or to an electric
+disturbance, makes no difference so far as the transformation
+and transference of energy are concerned.
+For sound there is the antecedent of vibratory motions
+\DPPageSep{304.png}{289}%
+\index{Growth}%
+in the air; for light, waves in the ether; for touch,
+mechanical pressure; for taste, chemical solution; and
+for smell, gaseous substances with definite constitutions
+and rates of vibration. These represent the ordinary
+stimulants to action of such nerves, and so are commonly
+understood to be the source of disturbance; but
+every one of these so-called special nerves may be
+excited to action by other agencies than the common
+or normal ones, and the effect is the same. Thus, the
+optic nerve may be stimulated by pressure, by cutting,
+pricking, thumping, and electricity, and the effect is the
+sensation of light; and, in the absence of other sources
+of information as to the origin of the sensation, no one
+could tell which of these was the originating one.
+Every one of them, however, represents some form of
+energy spent upon the nerve. What is important to
+note about it is this,---the nerve transmits an impulse
+it receives, quite indifferent as to its source, and is
+interpreted as a definite sensation, quite independent
+of its origin. The latter is only an inference, and is,
+therefore, liable to be \DPtypo{eroneous}{erroneous}.
+
+But there are several other kinds of nerves, each
+with some different function from the rest. Thus there
+are nerves running to muscles, causing them to contract,
+called motor, or efferent, nerves; secretory nerves,
+to glands that cause secretions; vascular nerves, that
+cause contraction or dilatation of the walls of blood-vessels;\DPnote{** Only instance,}
+inhibitory nerves, that affect other nerves so
+as to moderate or entirely stop their action; reflex, or
+afferent, nerves, which convey disturbances to the brain
+or other nerve centres, but which cause no sensation;
+\DPPageSep{305.png}{290}%
+and still others known to exist, but the special functions
+of which are unknown.
+
+To describe the action of any nerve is to describe
+the transmission of energy in greater or less amount,
+and transmission in all cases requires time. This does
+not mean that the energy which does the special work
+of moving muscles or the chemical transformations of
+foods into tissues is transmitted by the nerves, but
+that the transformations of energy already present in
+each place where the work is to be done are controlled
+by nervous energy in the same way as a local galvanic
+circuit is controlled by a relay, or the explosion in a
+mine is determined by an electric spark. The energy
+available for all the purposes of an animal, including
+man, exists in the material of the body. The activity
+of protoplasm in the various cells transforms the various
+food stuffs into the proper substances needed. The
+energy is already present; it is only differently distributed
+by protoplasm; and nervous action determines
+what changes, if any, shall go on at a given place.
+
+Temperature determines whether any of the physiological
+process shall go on or not. Plants and animals
+of a low order, such as snakes, frogs, and fishes, may be
+frozen without injury. Some of the minuter forms of
+life can withstand arctic winters, for there is an abundance
+of insect life in those regions. On the other
+hand, a temperature of~$140°$ is destructive to the life of
+everything except the seeds and spores of a few microscopic
+beings. Some of these have been known to
+survive a temperature of~$200°$, continued for an hour
+or more; but nothing has been found that can withstand
+\DPPageSep{306.png}{291}%
+\index{Matter, living}%
+\index{Toepler-Holtz electrical machine}%
+the boiling temperature of~$212°$. The retarding
+influence of cold upon vital processes can be understood
+by considering that special chemical compounds require
+special temperatures to form; and, if energy has to be
+supplied to maintain the proper temperature, so much
+the less will be at disposal for other processes. If life
+processes were other than physical, it might be expected
+that they would not be quite so rigidly conditioned by
+physical surroundings.
+
+There is a distinction between a living plant or animal
+and the seed or spore or egg out of which they
+grow. Both are commonly spoken of as living things,
+but the processes that constitute life in the one are not
+present in the other in any degree; thus, for example,
+growing corn and the grain of corn from which the
+plant started. The grain of corn may be kept in a
+suitable dry place for several years without any apparent
+change, unless it be some loss in weight due to
+evaporation from it. How long it may exist thus and
+still be able to grow if planted is not known. Grains
+of wheat found with Egyptian mummies buried three
+thousand years ago have been said to grow, but there
+is much doubt about it, and botanists do not credit
+the story. A few years' keeping in moister climates
+destroys their ability to grow, and farmers always
+choose seed corn from last year's growth, which is an
+indication that there is a process of slow deterioration
+going on that ends after no long time in utter inability
+to grow under any conditions. This ability to remain
+for several years in a nearly stable condition is a property
+of the seed that does not belong to the plant; for,
+\DPPageSep{307.png}{292}%
+when growth has once really begun, it must keep on
+growing or die: arrest is impossible, which seems to
+show that life is a process rather than a condition, and
+the grain of corn is simply a combination of materials
+where, under suitable conditions, life may begin.
+
+The constitution of corn is well known; that is, the
+elements out of which it is built up, and the proportionate
+parts of each. Like other kinds of food, it has
+carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, for the chief constituents,
+and in addition a little sulphur, phosphorus,
+iron, potassium, and a trace of some others. These,
+when organized as they are in a grain of corn, form a
+very complex body indeed. There are not only molecular
+groups of many sorts, but these are segregated
+into families, so that bodies of one constitution are all
+in one locality, and bodies of other constitutions in
+other separate localities, but definitely arranged so as
+to be available when the life process begins. Once
+formed, it appears to be as inert as a crystal of any
+sort, and no change happens to it until such physical
+conditions as heat and moisture are provided. These
+it absorbs and transforms; a sprout appears, then a
+root, each with different functions, one for absorbing
+ether waves, the other for absorbing water. The
+energy of ether waves is utilized in digesting carbonic
+acid and building up the structure, and the
+growth is simply the addition of materials gathered
+in this way and elaborated into similar protoplasmic
+form and structure. Growth implies transformation
+of one substance into the material of another, and is
+effected by means of energy from external sources.
+\DPPageSep{308.png}{293}%
+\index{Atoms, life associated with}%
+\index{Foster, Dr.\ Michael, quoted}%
+The energy of a stalk of corn may be found by using
+it as fuel and finding its heat units per pound. It has
+about the same value as wood. The corn itself has
+somewhat higher value, which shows it to have a more
+complex molecular structure, and is correspondingly
+less stable.
+
+In like manner an egg, say that of a hen, possesses a
+degree of stability that does not belong to it after it
+has begun to grow. It may be kept with some care
+for a few months and retain its ability to develop into
+a chick; yet it ultimately wholly loses its possibility,
+which shows that slow changes of the nature of disintegration
+are going on that cannot be arrested. The
+physical condition necessary to initiate the growth of
+the egg is simply one of temperature. One hundred
+and four degrees continued for three weeks completes
+the process. When one reflects upon the nature of
+heat,---that it is but vibratory motion,---he can at once
+see that energy has been supplied to a complex mass
+of matter and it has been chemically transformed.
+There are new chemical products and new properties
+produced; and however wonderful the completed product
+may be, the factors at work to produce it have been
+absolutely physical from beginning to end. After
+growth has once begun the process must continue, at
+the peril of quick degeneration on stopping; so that an
+egg, like the grain of corn, seems to be a material
+structure where life may begin, rather than a living
+thing itself. Such a distinction has not, however,
+been made in the literature of the development of living
+things. It has, perhaps, only a philosophical importance;
+\DPPageSep{309.png}{294}%
+but, if there are any who would still hold that
+life is a something \textit{sui generis}, that may be considered
+apart from some material structure and not as a transformation
+process, it will be well for such to inquire
+what can become of such life as a grain of corn or an
+egg has when either of them is cooked, or when either
+of them is left for months or years and they rot. At
+first it is in the grain of corn or egg. If it be an entity
+of any sort it must be somewhere else after leaving
+either the one or the other. On the other supposition
+the question does not arise at all, for it is plain that
+disintegration destroys the molecular arrangement, and
+with the destruction of that the properties of such
+organizations of matter must go also; for the properties
+of a mass of matter are, by general agreement, the
+result of the arrangements of the matter. Woody fibre
+and starch are of precisely the same chemical composition,
+but the properties of the two are far from being
+identical.
+
+What, then, is the distinction between what is called
+living and dead matter? One is able to transform
+energy for its maintenance, and the other seems to be
+wholly inert; yet, if analyzed, both may be reduced to
+precisely the same amount of elements.
+
+An analogy may make the distinction plainer. A
+maker of physical instruments may make what is called
+a Toepler-Holtz electrical machine. It is composed of
+wood and glass and brass and tinsel and tin foil, and
+possibly of other materials. Each one of these is got
+at a different place from the rest, and all are assembled
+in the shop of the maker. The individual parts are
+\DPPageSep{310.png}{295}%
+\index{Fields, physical}%
+\index{Fields, thermal}%
+\index{Physical fields}%
+shaped in particular ways, and these are at last fixed in
+their appropriate places. The machine is done; but it
+has never generated an electric spark, and one could
+discover no electricity about it. Indeed, there is none,
+any more than when the material was unshapen and
+lying upon his bench. If the proper kind of energy is
+spent upon it, however, it at once becomes electrified,
+and electrical energy may now be got from it in indefinite
+quantity, dependent wholly upon the proper turning
+of the crank. If that be turned the wrong way, or
+if it be stopped, the electricity soon quite disappears.
+Now, it is the function of such a machine to transform
+mechanical energy into electrical, and it does this so
+long as energy is furnished for transformation and the
+integrity of the machine is maintained. If one weighs
+the machine before it has been worked, and also while
+it is electrified, he will find no difference. If the brass
+buttons get off or displaced, if the belt gets broken or
+the glass cracked, the machine will weigh just as much
+as it did when they were in place; but the property of
+the machine to transform energy will be destroyed, and
+it may be as useless for the purpose as a coffee-mill
+would be. One might speak of the whole machine as
+an organism,---its wood and glass and brass as its molecular
+composition, its function depending upon each
+of these being in its appropriate place, and nothing
+more. It can only exercise that function when energy
+of the proper sort is turned into it. If its molecular
+composition is deranged in any of a dozen different
+ways, no one is surprised that it no longer responds to
+the turning of the crank. If the complete and perfect
+\DPPageSep{311.png}{296}%
+machine be called living, then the one with its
+parts disarranged so it can no longer perform its functions
+might be called a dead machine.
+
+The egg may be likened to the machine. So long as
+its molecular arrangement is intact, so long it is competent
+to transform the heat supplied to it and exhibit
+new properties. When the molecular arrangement is
+interfered with, whether from within or without, its
+function as transformer ceases, and we call it dead.
+
+It may be said, and often has been, that every living
+thing has an ancestry of living things; and in human
+experience it is true. It is sometimes said that one
+cannot get out of a mass of matter what is not in it,
+which, in this case, might imply that matter itself is
+alive, as suggested a few pages back, though I have
+never heard any one so conclude. If one would apply
+this dictum, let him settle with himself before turning
+a new electrical machine whether the electricity he is
+to get from it is or is not in the machine, and how, if it
+be in the machine, he can get an infinite amount from
+it by simply turning the crank. He may reach the conclusion
+that what can be got out of a mass of matter
+depends upon its composition and structure.
+
+In conclusion, one perhaps can do no better than to
+quote the words of Dr.\ Michael Foster, Professor of
+Physiology, University of Cambridge, England, as to
+the properties of protoplasm. ``The more these molecular
+problems of physiology are studied, the stronger
+becomes the conviction that the consideration of what
+we call structure and composition must, in harmony
+with the modern teachings of physics, be approached
+\DPPageSep{312.png}{297}%
+\index{Electrical field}%
+\index{Fields, electrical}%
+under the dominant conception of modes of motion.
+The physicists have been led to consider the qualities
+of things as expressions of internal movements; even
+more imperative does it seem to us that the biologist
+should regard the qualities of protoplasm (including
+structure and composition) as in like manner the expressions
+of internal movements. He may speak of
+protoplasm as a complex substance, but he must strive
+to realize that what he means by that is a complex
+whirl, an intricate dance, of which what he calls chemical
+composition, histological structure, and gross configuration
+are, so to speak, the figures; to him the
+renewal of protoplasm is but the continuance of the
+dance, its functions and actions the transferences of
+the figures\ldots. It seems to us necessary, for a satisfactory
+study of the problems, to keep clearly before
+the mind the conception that the phenomena in question
+are the result, not of properties of kinds of matter,
+but of kinds of motion.''
+
+If such be the case, it is clear that the solution of
+every ultimate question in biology is to be found only
+in physics, for it is the province of physics to discover
+the antecedents as well as the consequents of all modes
+of motion.
+%\DPPageSep{313.png}{298}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XII}{Physical Fields}{298}
+
+\Section{I.---THE THERMAL FIELD}
+
+\First{When} a mass of matter of any kind possesses
+energy of such a kind as to be able to impart some or
+all of it to the medium about it, whether that medium
+be the air or the ether, which transmits or distributes
+it outwards with a velocity which depends solely upon
+the ability of the medium to transmit energy, and not
+upon the source of it, the energy so distributed is
+called radiant energy.
+
+The term was first applied to the energy radiated by
+a hot or luminous body, from which the heat was said
+to be radiated away, the motions of the molecules of
+the hot body being transformed into wave motions in
+the ether. The wave motion thus set up is known to
+be competent to set other masses of matter upon
+which it falls into vibratory molecular motions, similar
+to those that originated the waves. In other words,
+they are capable of heating other matter. The space
+within which such effects can be produced will evidently
+be limited only by the distance to which the
+wave motion is transmitted, and this in turn depends
+upon the special medium concerned---in this case the
+ether---and the uniformity of its distribution. As has
+\DPPageSep{314.png}{299}%
+\index{Inductive action}%
+been already pointed out, the ether transmits such
+wave motions in straight lines, and to an indefinite
+distance,---so great at least as to require not less than
+five thousand years to cross the space accessible to our
+observations. As such waves of all wave lengths
+travel with equal velocities, and as all known bodies
+of matter are continually radiating waves of many
+wave lengths, it follows that in reality every molecule
+of matter sets the whole visible and invisible physical
+universe in a tremor. The magnitude of this effect is
+not now under consideration.
+
+The space external to a body within which the body
+can act in this physical way upon other bodies, so as to
+bring them into a condition similar to its own, is called
+its \emph{field}. The heat or thermal field of a mass of
+matter of any size and of any temperature must,
+therefore, be as extensive as the universe, unless the
+ether absorbs the energy to some extent and becomes
+itself heated. At present there is no evidence that
+such an effect is produced. Some astronomers have
+inferred that absorption takes place, else the whole
+surface of the sky would be bright with the multitude
+of stars that occupy it. On the other hand, if absorption
+did take place in a manner at all comparable
+with gaseous absorption, it would be selective in some
+degree, and the more distant stars would have a color
+different from those closer to us; and the colors of all
+stars would depend upon their distance from us. If
+such a condition had been observed, it would be conclusive
+evidence of absorption in the ether, but it has
+not been observed.
+\DPPageSep{315.png}{300}%
+\index{Earth, a magnet}%
+\index{Electrical waves}%
+\index{Magnetic field}%
+\index{Waves, electric}%
+
+Furthermore, the perception of light implies a definite
+though a small amount of energy; and, as the
+energy of ether waves from a given point upon a
+surface varies inversely as the square of the distance
+from the point, it follows that there must be some
+distance from it where the energy upon the retina
+must be too slight to affect it; and hence the inability
+of the eye to perceive the light could not be
+used as an argument against the existence of the waves
+altogether. At the rate of $186,000$ miles per second
+light travels $5,800000,000000$ (nearly six millions of
+millions of miles) a year, and in five thousand years,
+which is the distance of some of the more remote
+stars, $29000,000000,000000$ (twenty-nine thousand
+millions of millions) of miles. This, therefore, is the
+known length of the radius of the thermal or light
+field of a heated or luminous body; and, as such heat-producing
+waves are radiated in every direction about
+the body, the sphere having such a radius represents
+the space within which any or every atom of matter
+can affect other atoms to heat them.
+
+
+\Section{II.---THE ELECTRICAL FIELD.}
+
+The phenomenon called electrical induction, by
+which one body becomes electrified by simply being
+in proximity to another body which is electrified, is
+another illustration of both a \emph{field} and its property,
+depending altogether upon its origin. But an electric
+field differs in a marked way from a thermal field.
+
+Imagine a sphere---say a cannon-ball---to be electrified,
+and be isolated a long way from any other body.
+\DPPageSep{316.png}{301}%
+Its effect upon the ether about it would be equal in
+every direction. Practically, it would be distributed as
+the thermal field would be; and, if the strength of the
+field should be measured in any way, it would be found
+to vary inversely as the square of the distance from
+the body that produced the field. When such an electrified
+body is adjacent to other bodies, as is necessarily
+the case with every electrified body upon the
+earth, the strength of the field at a given point is
+found to depend upon the size, the nearness, and the
+quality of the adjacent body. Suppose the adjacent
+body were a similar cannon-ball, and its distance from
+the former one foot. Then the strength of the field
+would be found to be greatest between them, and to be
+very weak in the space equidistant and on the opposite
+side. One may get a mechanical idea of the condition
+of things by imagining straight lines drawn from the
+electrified body when out in space as if they were rays
+of light, evenly distributed in space. When, as in the
+second case, another ball is near to it, these rays crowd
+around the second one and apparently are absorbed by
+it; and these may now be represented by the same
+lines, starting at the same places as before, but sweeping
+in curves to the second, with only here and there
+one to escape into the unoccupied space. The nearer
+the two are together the more closely are these lines
+crowded together in the space between; and, as the
+number of these lines in a given area represent the
+strength of the electric field, it is plain the field is
+strongest where the lines are most crowded. On the
+other hand, if the second ball had been made of glass,
+\DPPageSep{317.png}{302}%
+\index{Chemical field}%
+\index{Fields, chemical}%
+the field would have been changed but little, for glass
+is a substance having but little absorptive power for
+electric rays; that is, it is not much affected by an
+electric field. When such an electrified ball is suspended
+in an ordinary large room, these lines, representing
+the field, are distributed about the room in a
+manner that depends altogether upon the kind of
+material there is in the room. The metallic objects,
+such as a stove, a steam-radiator, a gas-pipe, and the
+like, will divide the field between them, not equally,
+for the nearer ones will have the most, and other parts
+of the space in the room will have but a trace of it.
+The great distinction between the electrical and the
+thermal field will be apparent when one reflects upon
+what the latter would be for the same cannon-ball made
+hot and suspended, in the same manner, in the room.
+The rays go straight in every direction, and are not
+deflected by proximity to other bodies. The one is
+uniform in every direction about it; the other is warped
+by the presence of other bodies.
+
+An electric field, which is merely the ether in a
+condition of stress, electrifies the bodies upon which it
+acts; that is to say, it produces in them a condition
+similar to that of the body that produced the field. It
+does not heat them: it electrifies them. The process
+is ordinarily called induction. If one would follow
+mentally the mechanical conditions and changes that
+take place when this process of induction takes place,
+let him imagine the two cannon-balls suspended in
+a room a few feet apart, and one of them to be
+suddenly electrified artificially in any kind of a way,
+\DPPageSep{318.png}{303}%
+\index{Crystallization}%
+as by connecting it to a charged electrical machine for
+an instant. The re-action upon the ether will at once
+begin. The stress into which it will be thrown will be
+propagated outwards as a wave, with the velocity of
+light, and equally in every direction about it too, until
+the advancing wave reaches the second ball, when the
+absorption so reduces the stress that other parts of
+the field can move towards it, thus distorting it; for
+at the outset every part of the wave moved in a radial
+line. This must be the case unless the field acted
+intelligently instead of mechanically, and knew where
+it was to go beforehand. Of course no one would
+suppose that, but the remark is made to emphasize
+the necessity for the mechanical steps in order to have
+clear ideas of what has happened. The whole would
+happen in so small a fraction of a second that it would
+be exceedingly difficult to measure it, but the rate at
+which a thing is done does not necessarily modify the
+way of doing it.
+
+\Section{III.----THE MAGNETIC FIELD.} %
+
+The distribution of iron filings about a magnet gives
+one a very definite mechanical conception of the shape
+and properties of a magnetic field. It has before been
+remarked that the shape of the field depended upon
+the form of the magnet, and when this was altered the
+field changed its form. That it too represents a condition
+of the ether seems unquestionable. That it is produced
+by the arrangement of the molecules of the magnet
+is also certain; but that presumes that the atoms
+themselves are magnets, each having its own field.
+\DPPageSep{319.png}{304}%
+\index{Mechanical field}%
+When these atoms are either in disorder or so arranged
+as to mutually cancel each other's field, there is no field
+observable. When they are made to all face one way,
+their individual fields will conspire to produce a resultant
+field, which will be strong in proportion to the
+number of such individual fields that make it up. The
+nature of this magnetic field is probably a kind of
+whirl or spiral movement in the ether between the
+two poles of the magnet; but, as two similar adjacent
+whirls or lines are mutually repulsive, they spread out
+into space indefinitely, and are almost always curved.
+The earth as a great magnet has such a field, the lines
+reaching from the north polar regions upwards and
+southwards, re-entering the earth by similar downward
+sweeps in the south polar regions. How far away
+from the earth some of them may extend no one
+knows, but there seems to be no reason why they
+should not extend as far as any ray of light. There is
+good reason for thinking that the other members of the
+solar system are magnets, especially as iron and nickel
+are so abundant in the sun and in the meteorites that
+reach us from space. If that be the case, they are all
+moving in each other's magnetic fields. As the movement
+of a conductor in a magnetic field produces an
+electric current in the conductor, and as what are known
+as earth currents, apparently due to some extra terrestrial
+source, are well known, their origin is accounted
+for. But, when there is iron in a magnetic field, the latter
+acts upon it so as to compel it to produce a field of
+its own. In other words, it makes a magnet of the iron.
+The process is called magnetic induction. Like the
+\DPPageSep{320.png}{305}%
+other cases, it is a two-step process. There is, first, the
+magnet with its molecular arrangement; second, the
+action of the magnet upon the surrounding ether; and,
+third, the re-action of the ether upon the second body,
+making it a magnet. The heat field heats a body, the
+electric field electrifies a body, the magnet field magnetizes
+a body; and each of these fields may exist separately
+or simultaneously, and each do its own characteristic
+work, quite independent of either of the
+others: so the same body may become magnetized, electrified,
+and heated at the same time by the same medium,
+acted upon by three different sources. The magnetic
+field is more selective in its action than either of
+the other two. A heat field will heat any kind of matter
+in it if it be solid or liquid; an electric field will
+electrify all bodies to some degree, but solid conducting
+bodies to the highest degree; while the magnetic field
+magnetizes only iron, nickel, and cobalt appreciably,
+and the two latter but to a very small extent. The
+point of chief importance here is the function of the
+field itself to produce, in a certain kind of elementary
+solid matter, a molecular disposition and arrangement
+similar to that of the body which produced the field.
+
+\Section{IV.--THE CHEMICAL FIELD.} %
+
+The phenomena attendant upon the combination of
+atoms into molecules, and molecules in cohering together
+to form larger masses, make it certain that each
+atom has a peculiar field, which, for a name, may be
+called its chemical field, within which it acts upon the
+\DPPageSep{321.png}{306}%
+\index{Attraction, gravitative}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+ether about it, and which extends to a distance from it
+many times the diameter of any atom or molecule.
+
+Chemists have concluded that there is really no distinction
+between what has been called chemical attraction
+and cohesive attraction; such, for instance, as enables
+a drop of water to adhere to a surface, or glue to
+hold wood surfaces together.
+
+Crystals are built up of similar cohering molecules
+arranged in a definite order. And these molecules exist
+as independent bodies while in the solution before
+being crystallized, and consequently each molecule must
+have some degree of attraction for others; and this is
+about the same as saying that there is an ether stress
+about each one that depends upon its temperature, for
+crystallization cannot take place in a solution above a
+definite temperature. But one of the best evidences of
+a chemical field of the sort is found in the fact that a
+solution of a given crystallizable salt has its process
+easily initiated by putting in a small crystal of the same
+kind of a substance. Moreover, the mere presence of
+certain kinds of molecules among others is sufficient to
+bring about chemical changes which otherwise would
+not occur; while the catalytic body, as it is called, is not
+changed. This is the case with starch, which is converted
+into sugar by the mere presence of sulphuric
+acid, which undergoes no change. This is apparently
+inexplicable, unless it is admitted that molecules of all
+sorts have fields which, in one degree or another, control
+chemical combinations. This has been treated of
+at some length in the chapter on chemism. Its signification
+here is to point out again that the field of similar
+\DPPageSep{322.png}{307}%
+\index{Growth}%
+molecules is of such a sort as to compel within it an arrangement
+of atoms into similar molecules, and molecules
+into similar positions, as exhibited by crystals of
+any sort. It is, therefore, another example of the property
+of a physical field to bring about in a mass of matter
+within it the same kind of physical phenomena as
+that which induced the field.
+
+\Section{V.--THE MECHANICAL FIELD.} %
+
+A sounding body sets up air waves that travel outwards
+radially from it in every direction to an indefinite
+distance. Such periodic waves are capable of making
+other bodies vibrate at the same rate as the original
+body. When the second body has the same specific
+rate, absorption takes place, the amplitude of vibration
+increases, and the case is known as one of sympathetic
+vibration. When the specific rate is different from
+that of the recurring waves, there is more or less interference,
+and this case is called forced vibration. In all
+cases, however, the second body is made to vibrate by
+the sound waves that fall upon it, whether the medium
+be the air or any other substance, solid or liquid. And
+the space within which such effects are produced is the
+field of the first or sounding body. If one considers
+simply the air as the medium of the field, it will be
+perceived that sound waves travel in every direction in
+it, and to distances unlimited except by the presence of
+the air itself. Of course, the farther the distribution
+goes on the less energy there will be to any cubic inch
+or any other dimension, and there must be some limit
+\DPPageSep{323.png}{308}%
+\index{Thought transference}%
+where the energy is too small to affect the organs of
+hearing; but such a limit ought not to be considered
+the actual limit of sound vibrations or the field of the
+sounding body. There is no reason for doubting that
+every sound vibration of every kind and degree is distributed
+throughout the whole earth and its atmosphere,
+and more than that: as the impact of molecules in
+sound vibrations results in heating them to a higher
+temperature, increased radiation into space follows, and
+the consequent energy in this form must affect in some
+degree every particle of matter in the universe upon
+which it falls. It is plain how far-reaching almost every
+act and movement of every kind must be.
+
+A sound vibration, being a to-and-fro movement of a
+mass of matter, may easily be great enough to be seen,
+as in the case of a tuning-fork or a piano string; and,
+therefore, it is treated as being mechanical as distinguished
+from molecular: but even where the sound
+vibration is too slight to be seen as an actual displacement,
+it can give to another body a large amount of
+visible motion, as when a suspended marble is held
+against a sounding tuning-fork, or as when a paper
+windmill is held over a sounding Chladni plate.
+
+The motion of a sounding body being mechanical,
+the field it produces may be called the mechanical field,
+because the effect of it upon other bodies is similar in
+kind to that which produced the field. There are, therefore,
+five well-defined modes of physical action,---heat,
+electricity, magnetism, chemism, and sound,---which, in
+the past, have often been called physical forces, each
+one of which affects the medium about it, producing
+\DPPageSep{324.png}{309}%
+\index{Hair-cloth loom}%
+\index{Machines}%
+either a stress or a motion, or both---conditions that
+travel outwards into space indefinitely, and constitute as
+many different physical fields. They may all co-exist in
+the same space without interference, and each one produces
+upon other bodies of matter within it the same
+physical condition of motion, position, or arrangement as
+that which initiated the field itself. So the established
+relation deserves to be called a law better than many
+relations that are called laws, but are such only within
+rather narrow limits (as, for instance, the law of Charles
+and \DPtypo{Boyles}{Boyle's} Law), inasmuch as this law of physical fields
+is as universal as gravitation.
+
+What is called gravitation might be included in this
+list, for every particle of matter attracts every other
+particle near or far; so every atom has a gravitative
+field as extensive as the universe, and there is no more
+interference between it and the other fields than there
+is between any of them. The chief distinction between
+the gravitation field and all of the others is that
+they are all artificially\DPtypo{,}{} variable while gravitation is not
+known to be, though some phenomena indicate the
+possibility of it.
+
+It follows, from the foregoing, that every object large
+or small is continually affecting the space about it in
+several different ways,---through its temperature, electric
+and magnetic conditions, as well as by its various
+movements; and it also follows that the shape of a body
+as well as its molecular arrangement determines whether
+the field shall be symmetrical or otherwise. A crystal
+certainly has a symmetrical field, but it cannot be
+turned over in the hand without affecting in some degree
+everything outside of it.
+\DPPageSep{325.png}{310}%
+
+If it be true for certain collocations of matter that
+external form and molecular arrangement determine
+the existence of its field, it is difficult to imagine why
+it should not hold true for all cases,---a cell structure
+for instance, in which case the organization of a similar
+cell in adjoining space where the proper material for
+construction exists would only be in accordance with
+the physical properties of fields in general; and the
+phenomenon of growth would be as definitely understood
+as the growth of a crystal. This is not demonstrative;
+but it is in accordance with everything else we
+know, and is what would be predicted by one who knew
+the properties of physical fields, though he had no
+knowledge of cell growths.
+
+To take one step more, yet not to go beyond the domain
+of physics: It is as certain as any physical fact
+can be that every movement of an individual---change
+of attitude, gesture, or expression of countenance---must
+produce a corresponding change in his field, and
+tend to bring about in others similar movements; and,
+even if such phenomena are not observed in every one,
+it is no more of an argument against the existence of
+the operative conditions than is the failure to perceive
+through the sense of feeling the sound vibrations produced
+by a speaker's voice, when it is certain the whole
+body is in a state of tremor; and the effect of sympathetic
+speech is more largely physical than has been supposed.
+Strong emotions, or the physical semblance of
+them by skilful actors, re-act in the same physical way.
+This is not saying there may not be other factors, but
+the purely physical ones are present and act in the way
+\DPPageSep{326.png}{311}%
+\index{Motion, transformations of}%
+described. The term ``sympathetic action'' was applied
+to physical phenomena when it was discovered to be a
+mode of action quite analogous to mental phenomena
+between individuals in which similar mental states are
+induced.
+
+Lastly, so far as mental action depends upon brain
+structure, any changes in the latter must produce corresponding
+changes in the brain field, and there must
+be a brain field if there be any truth in the foregoing;
+the conclusion is inevitable. Other similar structures
+must be affected in some degree by them, and whether
+such induced changes be able to induce similar brain
+changes with the accompanying mental phenomena or
+not must evidently depend upon the possibility of
+synchronous action.
+
+This is not to be understood as asserting that such
+thought transference as is implied in the foregoing actually
+occurs. All that is asserted is that the physical
+conditions necessary for such transference actually
+exist, and one who was acquainted with the properties
+of physical fields would certainly predict the possibility
+of thought transference in certain cases.
+%\DPPageSep{327.png}{312}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XIII}{On Machines.---Mechanism}{312}
+
+\index{Push and pull}%
+
+The common notion of a machine is that it is an implement
+designed for doing this or that: as, for instance,
+a loom is a machine for weaving cloth or carpets; a
+steam-engine is a machine for driving machinery; a
+water-wheel, for utilizing the power of water; and so on.
+Some of these structures, built for specific purposes, are
+highly complex, and many of their parts stand in curious
+relation to each other, and altogether they may be able
+to produce results that seem but little short of intelligent
+action. Looms weave out beautiful fabrics with
+artistic designs in colors, when furnished with only the
+bare threads. The hair-cloth loom draws with iron fingers
+a single hair from a large bundle of hairs. If it
+fails to grasp one, another and another attempt is made
+until one is seized, and meanwhile the rest of the machinery
+waits. If it seizes more than one, as sometimes
+happens, it drops both and tries again, the rest of the
+apparatus waiting as before, exhibiting a kind of deliberativeness
+and consciousness of what it is about that
+one hardly looks for through any combination of wheels,
+ratchets, levers, and the like, such as make up a complex
+machine. Every one knows that by far the larger
+number of things in common use which were formerly
+\DPPageSep{328.png}{313}%
+made by hand tools are now made by machinery more
+rapidly and oftentimes more perfect than they could be
+made by hand. The parts of clocks and watches are
+so made; papers are printed, folded, and directed at
+the rate of ten thousand in an hour by one machine;
+grass is mown, grain is cut, threshed, and winnowed by
+one machine as fast as it can be driven through the
+field; shoes, toys, and beautiful pictures are thus made
+by the million, and there is no department of human
+effort but is dependent upon mechanism of some kind.
+In many cases the entire work is thus done automatically,
+as when pins and needles are made from the wire,
+sharpened, polished, counted, arranged in papers, and
+folded ready for the market. There is no field independent
+of such aids. Even music is absolutely dependent
+upon it, and all that is called sentiment and feeling
+in it are resolvable into degrees and directions of movements
+for the production of sounds; and there are no
+movements of muscles but may be duplicated by automatic
+mechanism. If the effects produced by mechanism
+to-day are not the effects wanted, it only shows
+that the mechanism has not been perfected, not that it
+cannot be done.
+
+If one considers the almost infinite number of processes
+needed for the maintenance, conveniences, comforts,
+and tastes of what is called civilized life, it might
+seem as if an almost unlimited number of physical conditions
+would be necessary; but let such an one recall
+the fact that all kinds of motions are reducible to not
+more than three fundamental kinds,---translatory, vibratory,
+and rotary,---and he will be prepared to trace
+\DPPageSep{329.png}{314}%
+\index{Lever}%
+\index{Pulley}%
+the most complicated movements to these elementary
+forms.
+
+In the chapter on motion, only the kinds of motion
+were considered; but here it is proposed to point out
+the conditions under which motion is transferred from
+one place to another, and how these elementary forms
+are transformed into each other. For convenience, the
+term ``mechanical motion'' will be employed for all having
+visible magnitude, but simply on the ground of visibility,
+not because there is any other distinction between
+such motions and those of a molecular or atomic kind.
+
+When one pushes against a paper-weight on the table
+and it moves in consequence, no one is surprised, for
+the movement is expected. If the weight were free to
+move and it did not move, no matter how strong the
+push, one would have reason to be surprised, because
+such a phenomenon is not in accordance with the
+experience of mankind. If one billiard-ball in contact
+with another one received a push in direction toward
+the latter, the latter would be moved in the same direction,
+and the motion of the second one would be explained
+by saying it was due to the push of the first
+upon it. Suppose there were ten or a hundred such
+balls in a line. If the end one was pushed towards the
+rest of them, they would all move, the farthest one as
+much as the first, as the movement imparted by push
+to the first would be handed on step by step to the last.
+If the balls were glued together at their points of contact,
+that would make no difference in this transfer of
+motion by contact; and, if there were a thousand or a million,
+or any other number, there would be no difference.
+\DPPageSep{330.png}{315}%
+\index{Work, measure of}%
+Neither would there be any difference if the separate
+balls were no bigger than molecules. A rod of wood
+or metal is entirely made up of a great number of cohering
+particles, and, when a push is applied to one end,
+every particle is pushed as much as the end particles.
+If there was a row of thin rubber balls and the end one
+was thus pushed, the side would be flattened somewhat,
+and the opposite side in contact with the next adjacent
+ball would push against its neighbor and each be flattened,
+and so on, till the last one was reached, which
+would be pressed on one side but not on the other, and
+would, therefore, be like a single ball pressed upon one
+side. The intermediate balls would act as transferrers of
+pressure from one end to the other. The rubber balls
+so flattened by pressure will recover their form when
+the pressure is removed, and the same may be said of
+a rod of any material, the difference in this particular
+being only one of degree. The same process takes
+place when one pulls upon a rod. It is to be remembered,
+however, that in either case the transmission of
+the pull is not instantaneous for any distance, however
+short. Time is requisite, and hence there is a rate of
+propagation of such motion in all bodies, which depends
+upon the degree of elasticity and the density of the
+material; and this rate cannot be exceeded, no matter
+how great the initial push or pull. This rate is about
+sixteen thousand feet per second for steel and the most
+elastic woods, and is about eleven hundred feet per
+second for air. If one inquires what the condition is
+that initiates motion in any given body, it will be found
+to be a push or a pull, and either of them may be measured
+\DPPageSep{331.png}{316}%
+in pounds. The chief distinction between a push
+and a pull lies in the relative position of the moving
+power and the body being moved by it. In the push,
+the body being moved leads in the line of movement;
+in the pull, the moving power leads. When a locomotive
+goes ahead of the train, it pulls; if the train goes
+ahead, it pushes. A stiff rod or bar may be used for
+either a push or a pull, but a rope can be used only for
+a pull, for when pressure is applied to it longitudinally
+it bends at right angles to the direction of the pressure,
+and so fails to act in the right direction. A rod can
+transmit a push or pull only in the direction of its
+length, while a rope may rest on a pulley and the pull
+may act upon any other body in the same plane the
+pulley turns in. If a pressure of ten pounds be applied
+as a push at one end of a rod or bar, the whole of that
+pressure may be transmitted to the other end. The
+same may be said of the pull either with a rod or rope,
+but neither rod nor rope can possibly transmit and give
+up at the one end more than is applied at the other.
+For this reason, a rope hanging over a pulley will hold
+equal weights on its two ends. If a ten-pound weight
+be tied to one end, the pull transmitted will be ten
+pounds, which may be balanced by a pull either by
+weight or in any other way on the other leg of the rope.
+The function of a pulley is to change the direction of
+the pull: it does not alter its amount.
+
+\Section{MECHANICAL MACHINES.}
+
+In the older treatises on natural philosophy, there
+were described several machines which were called the
+\DPPageSep{332.png}{317}%
+mechanical powers, because their principles were embodied
+in mechanical devices for transmitting pressure
+or pulls. The \emph{lever} stood first among them. It consists
+of a stiff rod or bar resting upon a point of support
+for it called a fulcrum, and this fulcrum may be
+placed anywhere between the ends of the bar. The
+advantage or disadvantage of this machine depends
+upon how near the fulcrum is to the body to be moved.
+A stiff rod four feet long supported at its middle would
+be balanced if it were of uniform dimensions. If a
+weight of ten pounds was hung at one end, an equal
+weight or pull would be needed at the other end to
+balance it. If one weight fell one foot, it would do ten
+foot-pounds of work in raising the other ten pounds
+one foot. In any case the work done, measured in
+foot-pounds, will be the same at both ends of the bar or
+lever.
+
+The lever changes the direction of motion or the
+amount of pressure, but does not change the amount
+of work measured in foot-pounds.
+
+The simple \emph{pulley} is a device for changing the direction
+of a pull, as seen in the apparatus for raising merchandise
+to higher levels in buildings; but by far the
+most extensive use of it is in the transfer of a continuous
+pull from one place to another through the agency
+of belts of leather or other pliable material.
+
+This combination of pulley and belt is adaptable to
+many places and purposes, as well as permitting great
+ranges in speeds of rotation by simply making the diameters
+of the pulleys proportional to the differences in
+rotation wanted. It is the chief agency in machine-%
+\DPPageSep{333.png}{318}%
+\index{Transformations of motion}%
+shops, factories, etc., for distributing the power to the
+various machines. By crossing the belt the second
+pulley can be made to turn in the opposite direction.
+
+In all the ways in which it is serviceable, it is plain
+that it cannot deliver more of a push or a pull than is
+given to it any more than can a lever. There is no
+gain of energy or work by its use, but always some loss,
+because friction uses up some of the working-power in
+other than useful ways. The \emph{wedge}, the \emph{inclined plane},
+and the \emph{screw} are but simple devices for utilizing push
+or pull; but there are other means also employed for the
+same purpose; for instance, the pressure of the air or
+other gas, and steam. Windmills are made to turn by
+the pressure of the wind upon the inclined blades, and,
+by forcing air into pipes, an increased pressure may be
+transmitted for long distances and then used. The
+reason this method of using air is not in more general
+use is that when the air is compressed it heats. The
+heat it loses soon if conveyed in pipes very far, and as a
+consequence its pressure is very much reduced, so it is
+not an economical thing to do. Water-wheels utilize
+the pressure of water, and the amount of work it can do
+is definite and easily calculated. If at a waterfall a
+hundred pounds of water falls ten feet, then it can do
+$100 \times 10 = 1,000$ foot-pounds of work; that is, it can
+raise $1,000$ pounds a foot high, and so on for any other
+amount. A perfect water-wheel that did not let slip
+by any water without its doing its work would give up
+practically $1,000$ foot-pounds. Really, the best water-wheels
+give but about ninety per cent of \DPtypo{the-working-power}{the working-power}
+of the water. So-called water-motors are but properly
+\DPPageSep{334.png}{319}%
+constructed wheels enclosed in the pipe through
+which water is made to flow with considerable pressure.
+In the cases of air, steam, and water power there is the
+condition we call a push, which may be measured in
+pounds; and a push measured in pounds multiplied by
+the distance in feet through which it is maintained is
+the measure of work.
+
+In each of the cases, the air, or steam, or water,
+as it moves on and does its work, gives up the motion
+it has; and the substance itself, being no longer of use,
+is allowed to escape as a waste product. Such bodies
+have been sometimes called \emph{prime-movers}.
+
+So far has been considered only the apparatus in
+common use for transferring motion of one body to
+other bodies, but frequently it is important to have the
+\emph{form} of the motion changed from the kind it may
+chance to have at the outset to one better adapted to
+the special end desired.
+
+In a sewing-machine, for instance, the particular
+movement of the needle must be vibratory. The
+treadle has a similar movement, but not rapid enough;
+so there is arranged between them a series of movable
+parts, which not only \emph{transfers} a certain amount of
+motion, but the latter is \emph{transformed} into appropriate
+forms. The vibratory motion of the treadle is transformed
+into the rotary motion of the balance-wheel,
+this into swifter rotation of the pulley by means of a
+belt; then by lever and cam the needle receives its
+proper kind of motion, the shuttle a similar one at
+right angles to that of the needle, and the other moving
+parts such forms of motion, and rates of motion, as
+\DPPageSep{335.png}{320}%
+are needful for their special kinds of work. In a steam-engine
+the constant pressure of the steam is made to
+act upon the alternate sides of a piston, giving it a
+vibratory motion, which must be transformed for most
+purposes into rotary; and this is effected by means of a
+crank, which is, therefore, a device for transforming vibratory
+motion into rotary, or \textit{vice versa}. When the
+driving-wheels of a locomotive are made to rotate, their
+adherence to the track carries the whole structure forward;
+that is, the rotary motion is transformed into
+translatory. In the stationary engine the rotary motion
+of the balance-wheel is transferred to a pulley by a
+belt, and the shafting transfers this through its whole
+length to other pulleys. If the reader will follow back
+to its antecedents any particular motion he may think
+of, he will see that the function of each movable part of
+a machine of any sort is to transfer push or pull, or
+transform one kind of motion into another kind. However
+complex a machine may be, it does no more.
+
+It is to be noted that \emph{what} a given thing will or may
+do depends altogether upon what kind or form of
+motion it has, not upon how much motion or energy
+it has. For instance, a bullet might spin on some axis
+on the table before one, and have great rotary velocity
+and energy, yet be perfectly harmless; whereas, if it
+had the same amount of energy with the motion translatory,
+it might be destructive to anything it struck.
+
+\Section{MOLECULAR MACHINES.}
+
+If one of the functions of a machine be to transform
+the kind of motion it is supplied with into some other
+\DPPageSep{336.png}{321}%
+kind of motion,---translatory into rotary or vibratory,
+any one into either of the others,---one may be prepared
+to follow mechanical processes from masses of
+visible magnitude into molecular magnitudes, and thus
+note the antecedents of the new phenomena that
+appear.
+
+When a gas is condensed by pressure the individual
+molecules have less free space to move in, and they
+consequently collide with each other more frequently.
+Being elastic, their average amplitude of vibration is
+increased proportionally, and a greater number of them
+will strike with greater velocity upon the walls of the
+containing vessel per second than before. Thus the
+temperature and the pressure of the gas are increased.
+We say that mechanical energy has been converted
+into heat energy, or sometimes simply into heat,
+though what has really happened has been the transformation
+of external translational motion into internal
+vibratory motion, which the elasticity and mobility
+of the molecules permit. When by friction or percussion
+a body is heated, the same thing precisely
+has happened: translatory motion has been transformed
+into vibratory, through the agency of the
+molecules, which have, therefore, acted as machines for
+transformation.
+
+In like manner the reverse transformation may take
+place in several ways. When the increased vibratory
+motion of the molecules produces an increased pressure
+upon the movable head of a piston in an engine, the
+piston as a whole may move and do work. Also, when
+the molecules strike harder upon one side of a surface
+\DPPageSep{337.png}{322}%
+than upon the other side, the surface moves toward
+the side of less pressure, as with the radiometer; so
+that both engine and radiometer are machines for
+\index{Machines}%
+transforming vibratory molecular motions into translatory
+mechanical motion.
+
+When the temperature of steam is raised to about
+$5,000°$~F., the amplitude of vibration is so great that the
+atoms can no longer cohere in the molecules, and they
+become separated into the gases hydrogen and oxygen;
+and again vibratory motion is transformed into translatory,
+which in gases is called free-path.
+
+Heat is also largely derived from the chemical properties
+of coal, wood, oils, gas, and other substances
+called fuel. As the heat is derived from some antecedent
+condition which is not heat, it follows that the
+stove or furnace is a machine for transforming into
+heat motions those motions which constitute and are
+the measure of chemism.
+
+When heat is applied in any way to the face of a
+thermo-pile, electricity may appear which may be made
+to do work in many ways. The vibratory motion disappears
+as such,---that is, it is annihilated,---while an
+electric current appears as its substitute. The thermo-pile
+is, therefore, a machine for the transformation of
+heat into electric current. If heat be a kind of molecular
+motion, then an electric current must be some
+other kind of motion!
+
+When the armature of a dynamo is turned and an
+electrical current is developed, the latter is the representative
+of the mechanical movement of the armature.
+It takes more power to make it move at a given
+\DPPageSep{338.png}{323}%
+speed when it is producing a current than when it is
+not. The current represents the difference. It is mechanical
+motion that goes into the dynamo, and an
+electrical current comes out of it; and hence a dynamo
+is a machine for the transformation of mechanical into
+electrical motion. One is visible, the other molecular,
+as is the case when friction develops heat.
+
+An ordinary static electrical machine possesses a
+similar function.
+
+On the other hand, a galvanic battery transforms
+chemical into electrical motions; and, in every case
+where electricity is developed, there is some sort of
+apparatus which receives one kind of motion for transformation.
+That one kind of machine will transform
+mechanical motion, a second heat, a third chemical, all
+into the same kind of a product, helps one to see that
+the antecedents, which at first seem to be so unlike,
+are really but varieties of the same condition, namely,
+motion, which, when transformed by suitable machines,
+might be expected to appear as a similar product of
+each.
+
+An electrical current always heats the conductor
+through which it passes. It is, therefore, an antecedent
+for the production of heat in the same sense as mechanical
+motion is an antecedent in condensation, percussion,
+and friction; and the conductor is the agency for
+the transformation into the vibratory molecular form.
+
+So far as the production of light by electricity is concerned,
+whether by the incandescent or the arc system,
+the function of the current is to raise the temperature
+of the conductor to the proper degree for luminousness.
+\DPPageSep{339.png}{324}%
+The light comes from the hot molecules, not from the
+electricity; but here, as in the simpler case of heating
+the conductor, the conductor itself, whether it be a filament
+of carbon or the tips of the carbon rods, acts as a
+transformer of electrical into heat motions, and thence
+to ether waves.
+
+Ether waves may be transformed in two different
+ways. First, by falling on molecules of matter; the
+latter absorb them, and are heated in consequence,
+which is the converse of the production of ether waves
+by heated molecules. Second, by their own interferences
+plane, elliptical, and spiral waves may be produced,
+which resultant waves are capable of affecting matter
+in different ways. One of these consequences is of so
+much theoretic importance it will be well to allude
+to it.
+
+Given a flexible section of a spiral ether wave, no
+matter what its origin. If its ends were to come together,
+there is good reason for thinking they would
+close and weld together, forming a ring, which would
+then be practically a vortex ring. The ends of vortex
+rings formed in the air will do thus, so if the atoms of
+matter are really vortex rings, as has been supposed,
+the above suggests how they may originate, or how
+matter is created.
+
+All the different kinds of phenomena which are generally
+attributed to different forces one may readily
+trace to these antecedents; namely, matter, ether, and
+motion of various forms. The condition necessary for
+a new phenomenon to appear is that the present forms
+of motion in either matter or ether needs to be transformed.
+\DPPageSep{340.png}{325}%
+Atoms and molecules, as well as large masses
+of them, which we call bodies of visible magnitude, act
+as machines for the transferrence and the transformation
+of motion; and one might define a machine as a \emph{collocation
+of matter having for its function the transferrence or
+the transformation of motion, or both}. An atom and a
+molecule, then, are as much machines as a steam-engine
+or a dynamo; and every molecule in the universe,
+whether near or remote, is constantly receiving and
+transforming energy through its individual motions.
+What the particular phenomenon will be in a given
+case depends upon the form of the motion received by
+the mechanism and the new form which the latter has
+made it to assume. As before remarked, what a given
+mass of matter will do depends upon the kind of motion
+it has.
+
+So far nothing has been said about the relation of
+these mechanical principles to living things,---animals
+and plants; but it will be obvious to every thinking
+person that unless, when matter assumes the forms exhibited
+by such living things, it surrenders its mechanical
+properties and relations, then such transformations
+must be going on constantly in all living things. Mechanical
+motions, chemical re-actions, heat, and so on,
+ought to be expected from such complex machines as
+animals. Foods, as fuel, air, and water, are physical
+factors which imply metamorphosis; and the forms into
+which the factors will be changed depend upon the
+special mechanism provided. Hence, an animal is a
+complex machine for the transformation of motions of
+various sorts, the sum of them being what are called
+the phenomena of life.
+\DPPageSep{341.png}{326}%
+\index{Solar system}%
+
+The foregoing analysis shows that what have heretofore
+been considered as forces in nature are non-existent;\DPnote{** Only instance.}
+that all phenomena in the different fields of
+physics are simply and plainly mechanical; and that
+an application of the laws of motion, as presented by
+Sir Isaac Newton, supplemented by the laws of ether
+action, is sufficient to account for all kinds of phenomena:
+and therefore the supposition of particular forces
+of any kind is entirely unnecessary. What have been
+called forces are but various forms of motion, of matter,
+or of the ether, each embodying energy; the particular
+phenomenon a given body may produce depending
+upon its size and the particular quality of motions it
+chances to have. Granting this, one may at once perceive
+that expressions implying higher and lower forms
+of force are misleading. No one is higher in dignity or
+importance than any other one. Let one ask the question,
+Which is higher, vibratory or translatory motion?
+and he will see the absurdity of the language.
+
+If one will bear these principles in mind, they will be
+helpful in unravelling phenomena which otherwise may
+appear to be very puzzling. For instance, one may frequently
+come across the statement that one cannot get
+out of a machine what is not in it or put into it. Is it
+so? Coal is put into the furnace, and heat comes out.
+Mechanical motion is put into a dynamo, and electricity
+comes out. A current of electricity is turned into an
+arc lamp, and light comes out. The character of the
+product thus depends upon the form of the machine
+and its relation to some antecedent factor. The physical
+\DPPageSep{342.png}{327}%
+\index{Physical universe a machine}%
+knowledge we have enables us in most cases to
+trace and understand the metamorphosis. In some
+cases the molecular changes are not so completely
+known in detail, yet the quantitative relations between
+what goes in and what comes out of the machine are so
+definite that one is warranted in asserting that no other
+factors are present than the one considered. In one
+sense the product of any machine is like its antecedent,
+if both be but kinds of motion, or forms of energy as
+some prefer to say; but if one assumes that these
+various forms of energy differ in any way from forms
+of motion, or that they have distinct individualities,
+then one can get out of a machine what he does not put
+into it. What seem to be more unlike than the mechanical
+movements of a steam-engine and the electricity
+of the dynamo? One is simplicity itself; the
+nature of the other, its product, has been the despair of
+philosophers for generations. The subject is of fundamental
+importance chiefly because some philosophers
+have evolved their schemes without duly considering
+these obvious relations.
+
+However much a given phenomenon may differ in
+character from its known antecedents, no good reason
+can be assigned for thinking that, when properly analyzed,
+it would be found resolvable into other factors
+than matter, ether, and motion. Furthermore, there is
+no evidence that any one of the physical forms of
+motion is or was necessarily prior to any other. As
+there is no hierarchy among them, no one of them can
+be called primal. A linear arrangement does not
+\DPPageSep{343.png}{328}%
+\index{Matter, as modes of motion}%
+properly represent their mutual relations. They are
+more like a closed ring of interrelations thus:---
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{center}
+ \Graphic{2.5in}{343a}
+ \Figlabel{35}
+
+ {\scriptsize Diag.\ 35.---Forms of Energy.}
+\end{center}
+
+The visible universe may be considered as a vast
+machine, within which motions are being exchanged
+by contact and by radiation. It is not the absolute
+amount of energy a body may have which determines
+whether it shall give or receive, but it is the degree
+it has of a given kind of energy. Thus it is the temperature
+of a body that determines for it whether it
+shall gain or lose heat in the presence of other bodies.
+The whole tendency is towards equalization of conditions,
+and for this reason some philosophers think they
+foresee the end of this act in the drama of the solar
+system. The possibility of the variety of phenomena
+that gives interest to existence depends upon the fact
+that at present matter is in an unstable condition, and,
+when uniformity of condition is reached, there will be
+an end to changing phenomena. Astronomers have
+figured out that in five or ten millions of years the sun
+\DPPageSep{344.png}{329}%
+\index{Cohesion, in solids and liquids}%
+\index{Matter, states of}%
+will have radiated away so much of his energy that the
+earth will no longer be habitable. Perhaps so; but it
+is certain that the whole solar system is drifting in space
+somewhere at the rate of seven hundred millions of
+miles a year, and in one million of years it may reach a
+region in space where the present rate of loss might be
+greatly reduced. In that time it will have travelled
+three times the distance to the nearest of the fixed
+stars. It could hardly be where its expenditure would
+be greater than now. If it should drift into one of the
+great hydrogen regions such as are numerous in the
+heavens, not only would the supply of energy be renewed
+indefinitely, but the earth would become uninhabitable
+in an hour. At any rate, there is no guarantee
+in nature for permanent stability, supposing that stability
+should be attained; for simple mechanical impact
+between the sun and any of the millions of stars would
+not only annihilate the earth as such, but would so
+reduce to a nebulous mass the matter that now composes
+the solar system that the whole process of world
+formation would have to be gone through with again.
+The sudden blazing out of stars here and there in the
+heavens shows that similar physical processes are taking
+place elsewhere in the universe. Such an end is
+quite as probable as the refrigerating one referred to;
+for there is implied in the latter not only that the present
+conditions in the solar system will continue, but
+that the environment of the solar system will remain
+for so many millions of years what it is. The matter
+is not alluded to here on account of its humanitarian
+\DPPageSep{345.png}{330}%
+\index{Cohesion, destroyed}%
+\index{Gas, motion in}%
+interest, but to point out that in either case the results
+will be due to purely physical conditions. What mankind
+would contemplate as a dreadful catastrophe would
+be but the interaction of huge machines, where energy
+was transformed on a grand scale, and no particle of
+matter omitted for an instant to conform to the three
+laws of motion.
+%\DPPageSep{346.png}{331}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XIV}{Properties of Matter as Modes of Motion}{331}
+
+\index{Gas, free path in}%
+\index{Gas, pressure in}%
+
+In the first chapter of the book only the most
+obvious qualities of matter are considered, such as
+magnitude, density, inertia, and so on, the properties
+which are exhibited by masses of matter of visible
+magnitude and form, from which the common notions
+concerning its nature and possibilities have been derived.
+If one stops his inquiries concerning the properties
+of matter with these, and imagines that they are
+the ultimate properties, and may rightly be assumed
+and asserted of the individual atoms, he will be greatly
+in error; for it is not difficult to show that nearly
+every property of masses cannot be true of atoms, and
+that nearly if not quite all material properties of what
+we call matter, are derived from antecedent conditions,
+and are resolvable into them or into mere relations
+which are not inherent, and may be absent. It is,
+then, worth the while to study the real significance
+of some of the physical terms in common use, in
+order the better to eliminate from the mind unessential
+qualities when thinking of the inherent qualities
+of matter.
+
+During the past ten years laboratory facilities for
+physical investigations have greatly aided inquirers,
+\DPPageSep{347.png}{332}%
+\index{Heat, effects}%
+and added much to real knowledge in this field. Some
+of this knowledge is of such a character as will presently
+make it needful for every one to reconstruct
+his notions and explanations of physical phenomena,
+in order to prevent hopeless confusion in his own
+thinking.
+
+\Section{THE STATES OF MATTER.}
+
+Under the conditions of ordinary observations matter
+is found in the solid, liquid, and gaseous states;
+the solid state being that in which the molecules
+cohere so strongly as not to be easily separated from
+each other nor from the relative positions they have
+assumed with reference to other molecules. Thus, a
+piece of granite, as the type of a solid, may have its
+molecules cohering to each other in certain positions,
+so strongly as to require a ton's weight to pull apart
+a section of one square inch.
+
+The granite is made up of small crystals of quartz,
+mica, and feldspar, each having a definite chemical
+composition. The individual crystals retain their relative
+places for an indefinite time, and the atoms of the
+individual molecules retain their relative positions for
+a like indefinitely long time, else the crystalline structure
+would be lost, for crystalline structure implies
+definite atomic arrangement as well as molecular
+arrangement. So in solids the adjacent molecules
+are in what are called stable positions, and are not
+easily separated.
+
+In a liquid there is little cohesion among the molecules,
+and no stable arrangement at all. The individual
+molecules move among each other without
+\DPPageSep{348.png}{333}%
+\index{Absolute zero}%
+\index{Charles, Law of}%
+\index{Chemism and heat}%
+\index{Chemical reactions depend on temperature}%
+\index{Gas, pressure in}%
+\index{Gas, destroyed}%
+\index{Matter, effect of temperature upon}%
+apparent friction, and the slightest force acting upon
+them makes them to turn on any axis; and there is
+good reason for thinking that in a liquid like water,
+the individual molecules are continuously rolling and
+tossing about with perfect freedom to move in every
+direction. The phenomena of diffusion exemplifies
+this. There is also good reason for thinking that the
+individual atoms in the water are continuously changing
+partners at a rapid rate, so if there were some
+means for identifying the atoms of hydrogen and oxygen
+in a given molecule, they might be seen presently
+all separated and forming temporary constituents of
+other molecules a relatively long remove from the first
+position where they were observed. When the water
+is frozen, that is has become a crystalline solid, this
+freedom of atomic change and molecular rotations is
+no longer recognized as a property. Molecular cohesion
+is now exhibited where before there was none.
+There are also new qualities called crystalline, hardness,
+density, and so on, which before this change did
+not belong to it. The new qualities which seem to
+have been developed are produced by lowering the temperature
+of the water, that is, reducing the amount
+of kinetic energy the molecules had; and by again
+imparting a like amount to the ice \emph{both crystallization
+and cohesion are destroyed}.
+
+A gas is a body of molecules in which the individuals
+are free to move in every direction unconstrained by
+any degree of cohesion, and where they are in frequent
+collisions, bounding away in new directions through
+distances usually many times the diameter of the molecules
+\DPPageSep{349.png}{334}%
+themselves. Thus, in air the ordinary average
+distance between impacts is nearly two hundred times
+the diameter of the individual particles which, as before
+stated, is in the neighborhood of one fifty-millionth of
+an inch. Their continuous bumping against each other
+and the walls of the containing vessel, produces what
+is called the gaseous pressure. Increasing the temperature
+of the gas increases the velocity of movement
+in the free path, and, consequently, the momentum and
+the pressure. It has been customary to say that heat
+increases the elasticity of a gas, that a gas occupies
+the whole space which encloses it, that a gas has a
+tendency to indefinite expansion, and that the properties
+of a gas are due to repulsive force among the
+molecules. In a loose sense such expressions may be
+allowed, but they are not to be understood as correctly
+specifying the qualities of the gaseous matter. It is
+not repulsion that makes a ball move which has been
+struck by a bat, but impact; and that it should continue
+to move on until it strikes another body, follows
+from the first law of motion, as true for a molecule of
+a gas as for a baseball. The direction the ball takes
+depends upon where it is hit, as well as upon how hard
+it is hit; the velocity it has depends upon how hard it
+is hit, and there is nothing peculiar to a gaseous particle
+requiring the affirmation of different properties.
+
+Some years ago improved methods of making a
+vacuum were adopted, by which one could reduce the
+amount of gas in a tube to even the hundred millionth
+of its ordinary amount, so that a particle might have a
+relatively long free path measurable in feet instead of
+\DPPageSep{350.png}{335}%
+\index{Diamond, hardness of}%
+\index{Hardness not atomic property}%
+hundred thousandths of an inch, and the phenomena
+of such rarefied gases were so new and surprising that
+it was at first conjectured that a new state of matter
+had been discovered, and it was called the fourth or
+ultra gaseous state to distinguish it from the others;
+but it was soon perceived that it was still only rarefied
+gas, and that no new qualities had been developed, and
+the same phenomena witnessed in the rarefied gas were
+present in the denser, only disguised by the greater
+number of molecules which took part. So what was
+called for a short time the fourth state has been
+practically abandoned.
+
+The three states already considered are known to
+depend upon temperature. Thus, if ice or iron or
+many other solids be heated they become liquid; if
+heated still more they become gaseous. Some solids,
+like wood, when heated do not assume the liquid intermediate
+form, but are at once converted into a gas;
+but different substances have different temperatures at
+which they change from one form to the other. Thus,
+water becomes a solid at $32°$~Fah., and a gas at $212°$~Fah.
+Iron becomes fluid at~$2,800°$ and gaseous at~$6,000°$. So
+far, then, it appears one might as properly speak of
+iron as a liquid or a gas, as of water as either, if they
+both may exist in the three conditions, and no temperature
+is specified. We do not do that, because when
+speaking thus ordinary temperatures are implied, but
+seldom or never thought of. If one had been brought
+up in the sun it is probable he would never have seen
+a solid, and if at the moon, he would know of neither
+liquid nor gas.
+\DPPageSep{351.png}{336}%
+\index{Color, nature of}%
+
+But the pressure of a gas is caused by the impact of
+its molecules, and is proportionate to the temperature.
+The law of Charles states what has been found to be
+true within the limits of experiment; namely, that the
+volume of a gas is proportionate to its absolute temperature;
+that is, temperature measured from an absolute
+zero, in which case, it is plainly to be seen, at
+absolute zero the \emph{gaseous} volume would be nothing.
+It does not imply that the matter of the gas would be
+annihilated, but that the matter no longer existed in
+its gaseous form; the individual molecules would no
+longer have any free path motion, but would fall to
+the floor of the containing vessel, and thus remain
+quiescent, like so much dust. \emph{At absolute zero there
+would be no gas.}
+
+Again, in the chapter on Chemism it is shown how
+chemical reactions are determined by temperature, and
+cannot take place in the absence of heat. The late
+experiments of Pictet and Dewar show that as temperature
+is lowered chemical reactions become weaker
+and weaker, until some of the elements that have very
+strong affinities at ordinary temperatures, and so combine
+with energy, are incapable of combining, and
+appear inert at such low temperatures as can now
+be artificially made without great difficulty. Their
+experiments confirm the conclusions given on \Pageref{page}{242};
+namely, that at absolute zero chemical affinity
+does not exist. Molecules would not only fall apart,
+but their individual atoms would no longer exhibit
+any cohesive quality; and this, it will be perceived,
+would render the existence of such a thing as either
+\DPPageSep{352.png}{337}%
+\index{Impenetrability}%
+a liquid or a solid quite impossible, for each requires
+chemical action for both molecular formations and
+cohesion in any degree. Every kind of a structure
+would crumble to atoms in a literal sense. Book,
+tower, mountain, ocean, as well as every living organism,
+would completely disintegrate, and lose every characteristic
+property which had belonged to it. Hence,
+such qualities of matter as would be absolutely emptied
+out of it by simply reducing its temperature, cannot
+be considered as essential qualities. Yet when the
+atoms were thus deprived of what seems to us as all
+their useful qualities, there is reason for thinking they
+would still have definite form, mass, gravitation, magnetic
+and electric qualities which, however, by themselves
+could not make the mass of matter we call the
+earth a habitable place, nor give to life a material
+habitat as it now has.
+
+It is then plainly evident that what we call solids,
+liquids, and gases, with all the laws that belong to each
+of them, are simply the relations of heat energy to
+groups of atoms, not the properties or laws that may
+be asserted of the atoms as such, and do not need to
+be considered by one who is inquiring for the essential
+endowments of matter.
+
+There remains, therefore, an examination of the
+other so called qualities to see if, perchance, they
+too may not, in a similar manner, be resolvable into
+energy relations, which, in turn, may be absent.
+\DPPageSep{353.png}{338}%
+\index{Elasticity}%
+\index{Elasticity due to motion}%
+
+\Section{MOLECULAR AND ATOMIC QUALITIES.}
+\Subsection{(HARDNESS.)}
+
+Substances vary greatly in what is called hardness,
+and this properly serves, in many cases, to distinguish
+one mineral from another. The mineralogist employs
+a scale of ten, differing in degree from talc which is
+the softest, to diamond which is the hardest, and with
+these all other minerals are compared. But the mineralogist
+tells us that this scale does not represent hardness
+in any proportional way, because diamond is as
+much as ten times harder than the ruby which stands
+next to it in the scale; also that some diamonds are so
+much harder than others, that no means has yet been
+discovered for grinding and polishing them.
+
+The diamond, however, is crystallized carbon, yet carbon
+exists in another crystalline form called graphite,
+or plumbago, which is soft, and may be whittled with
+a knife, while coke, charcoal, and lampblack are forms
+of precisely the same element, and these vary through
+the whole range in hardness. What, then, does hardness
+mean? Evidently it signifies the resistance
+offered to the separation of molecules from each other.
+It is the measure of their cohesion, and could have no
+existence in a single molecule of carbon. Furthermore,
+as has been pointed out, as molecular structure
+can have no existence at absolute zero for lack of
+energy needed for maintaining cohesion, \emph{hardness cannot
+be a property of atoms at all}.
+\DPPageSep{354.png}{339}%
+
+\Subsection{COLOR.}
+
+Color, either simple or compound, is exhibited by all
+masses of matter---for white is but a mixture of wave
+lengths, and no object is so black as to be invisible.
+Gold is yellow, copper red, lead is bluish. The petals
+of flowers, the feathers of birds, the gorgeous dyes of
+the chemist, seem to impress us with an assurance that
+color is a real quality of some kinds of matter, and can
+be affirmed of it without any qualifications. Bodies
+become visible either by their own luminousness as
+when they are hot or phosphorescent, or by the light
+reflected by them from some other source, as is most
+commonly the case. When sunlight falls upon a rose
+it is to be remembered that the sunlight is what we
+call white light; it is made up of all wave lengths which
+we can see. The rose petals absorb some of these
+waves,---the blue, the green, and the yellow, but not
+the red; these are rejected by the surface, and they
+therefore are reflected away, and testify to the selective
+power of the petals, \emph{not their color}, as can be found
+by holding the same rose in yellow or blue light, when
+it will appear black, that is, will absorb all offered to it
+and reflect little or none. Again, when a body is self-luminous,
+as, for example, a piece of burning sodium
+which gives out a yellow light, it is to be kept in mind
+that the yellow rays are produced by certain vibratory
+rates which the atoms are compelled for the time
+being to make, but which the atoms will not make
+except on compulsion, that is, the high temperature
+which the heat energy gives to it, and therefore does
+\DPPageSep{355.png}{340}%
+not represent what can be called the color of the body---only
+an artificial state of vibration. Lastly, if all
+substances whatever were at absolute zero in temperature,
+they would be setting up no ether waves of any
+length, and could not effect any organ of vision, and,
+consequently, would not only show no color, but would
+be absolutely invisible. \emph{Hence color cannot be affirmed
+of atoms.}
+
+\Subsection{IMPENETRABILITY.}
+
+It has seemed to nearly every one who has given
+thought to the subject that what is called impenetrability
+must be a fundamental property of matter;
+that it was axiomatic, if anything could be, that two
+masses of matter could not occupy the same space
+at the same time. This has been believed to be
+true, not because it was demonstrable, but because
+it seemed to be reasonable. Maxwell, however, calls
+it a vulgar opinion. He further takes the pains to
+say, If hydrogen and oxygen combine to form water,
+we have no experimental evidence that the molecule
+of oxygen is not in the very same place with the two
+molecules of hydrogen.\footnote
+ {See Art. Atom.\quad Encyc. Brit., 9th ed.}
+
+When it is possible to make one, a mechanical model
+is often of great assistance in helping one to conceive
+of conditions which are more or less difficult to describe
+in mere words; and a mechanical model that
+embodies this possibility of the coexistence of two
+atoms in precisely the same space may easily be made.
+Roll up a length of wire into a loose helix or spiral of
+any convenient length---say two feet long. Cut it in
+\DPPageSep{356.png}{341}%
+\index{Hertz waves}%
+\index{Magnetic waves}%
+\index{Tesla ether waves}%
+two parts of equal length, and bend the ends of each
+round until they touch, and fasten them thus, so as to
+have two rings made of spirals of wire. Each one may
+be taken as representing an atom of matter somewhat
+similar to a vortex ring, which has been assumed as
+\index{Vortex ring model}%
+the probable form of the atoms of matter. Each has
+form, size, and various other qualities, but if one of
+them be pressed down upon the other it will be found
+they will make room for each other, so that \emph{as rings
+they both occupy precisely the same space}. This is not
+given here as anything more than as, possibly, a
+helpful suggestion as to how a seemingly impossible
+condition may be true. Evidently in this case the
+difficulty lies in the assumption that an atom of matter
+is a hard, impenetrable, geometrical solid, and, as Maxwell
+says, there is no proof that such is the fact.
+\emph{Impenetrability is an unwarrantable assumption.}
+
+\Subsection{ELASTICITY.}
+
+Elasticity has been assumed to be a fundamental
+property of atoms, and so not derivable from physical
+conditions underlying it; but Lord Kelvin has shown
+good reason for thinking that elasticity is a derived
+quality, for it is possible to construct models which
+exhibit the phenomenon in a high degree while they
+are in motion, and not at all while they are at rest. A
+number of gyroscopic disks set whirling on a circular
+axis, shows this in a remarkable way, and suggests on
+inspection, that something like such an arrangement
+may be the complete explanation of the quality as
+exhibited by atoms. A vortex ring may be considered
+\DPPageSep{357.png}{342}%
+\index{Inertia}%
+\index{Mass}%
+as a large number of revolving disks on a circular
+\Pagelabel{342}% [** PP: Best guess at page anchor]
+axis, which will give to the ring not only rigidity, but
+stability of form, any departure from which will be
+resisted by the mechanical structure, and it will return
+to its original form after the deforming stress has
+ceased, with a rate depending upon the rate of rotation
+of the constituent
+%[Illustration: ]
+\begin{wrapfigure}[15]{l}{1.375in}
+ \Graphic{1.375in}{357a}
+ \Caption{36}{Diag.\ 36.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+parts of the ring. On \Pageref{page}{40}
+reference is made to the behavior of a rotating disk,
+and how it simulates this property of elasticity. The
+common gyroscope may be cited as exhibiting it in a
+\index{Gyroscope}%
+manner that depends upon the
+way in which the disk is mechanically
+mounted.
+
+An ordinary whirling disk can
+be freely moved only in its plane
+of rotation, or planes parallel to
+that. Any attempt to change
+the angle of the axis is mechanically
+resisted. This may be understood
+by reference to diagram
+where $a$~$b$ is a disk capable of
+rotation on axis $c$~$d$. While rotating,
+it can move freely in the
+plane $a$~$b$, but any attempt to tip
+the axis in any direction will be
+resisted by it. Imagine, then, a large number of similar
+disks, mounted on a circular axis, as in diagram~36,
+each one rotating. It is plain that any attempt to tip
+the ring in one direction or the other, or to change
+the form of the ring itself, supposing it to be flexible,
+will necessarily change the plane of some of the revolving
+\DPPageSep{358.png}{343}%
+disks, and will be resisted as a whole, for the
+same reason that one of its parts will do the same. It
+will be seen that if all these disks be rotating in the
+same direction the movements will be like those of a
+vortex ring. If additional disks could be inserted
+upon the axis, so as to form a continuous body quite
+round the circular axis, it would constitute a ring;
+and if the proper rotation were set up, it would possess
+all the qualities of a vortex ring, and elasticity
+would be a prominent quality, as stated on \Pageref{page}{39}. It
+is no longer necessary, if it ever was, to assume elasticity
+as a fiat quality, imposed upon atoms which
+might have existed without it; \emph{for the laws of motion,
+acting in a properly constructed mechanism, are quite
+sufficient to produce it}.
+
+\Subsection{MAGNETISM.}
+
+On \Pageref{page}{205} the statement is made that magnetic
+phenomena have led to the belief that all atoms of
+all kinds of matter are magnetic, and are only obscured
+in ordinary matter by the molecular arrangements
+which tend to neutralize the magnetic fields of the
+individual atoms. Attention is again invited to the
+diagrams on \Pageref{page}{105}, with the accompanying description,
+in order to freshly bring to mind how vortex
+motion necessarily produces what is called polarity---the
+two sides of the ring have different qualities.
+On one side the movements are all inwards, on the
+other outwards, and from these the phenomena of
+apparent attraction and repulsion necessarily follow.
+But beyond this, once\DPnote{** PP: Missing "we"?} assume that individual atoms
+\DPPageSep{359.png}{344}%
+\index{Gravitation}%
+are magnets by virtue of their constitution, and that
+every magnet has a magnetic field infinite in extent,
+within which it can affect other atoms, one can see
+at once that every atom in creation has a magnetic
+hold upon every other atom, because every one is
+in the magnetic field of every other one. This effect
+is not necessarily one of attraction or repulsion tending
+to move one mass towards or away from another;
+but, on the other hand, it tends to rotate each on an
+axis so both shall face the same way. So long as
+there is no change in position or in \emph{form} of such a
+magnet, the magnetic field will be uniform; but if the
+form be changed in any way the whole field has to
+change in conformity with it, as described on \Pageref{page}{252},
+and such vibrations as constitute the heat of an atom
+are really the change in form of the atom, and this,
+therefore, changes necessarily the whole magnetic
+field of the vibrating body. These changes in the
+field, which originate in this way, are what are called
+ether waves. When the waves are produced slowly,
+by an alternating dynamo current, or more swiftly by
+some of the methods so ingeniously devised by Hertz
+and Tesla, they are called electro-magnetic waves.
+When produced so swiftly as to have a wave length
+only the one thirty-thousandth of an inch, they have
+been called heat waves; and when the waves are so
+short as to be capable of affecting the retina of the
+eye, they are called light waves, though there is no
+distinction between any of them except in their length.
+The vibrations of the atomic magnet are rapid because
+it is small; the waves it produces are changes in
+\DPPageSep{360.png}{345}%
+\index{Gravity follows from structure}%
+its magnetic field in the ether, so one may trace
+back in this manner the phenomena of light, of heat,
+and electricity, to the mechanical structure of atoms;
+and it is mechanically intelligible too, and, like the
+preceding accounts of properties, it appears \emph{that magnetic
+and electric qualities are due to the peculiar kinds
+of motion embodied in the atoms}, and cannot be considered
+as particular endowments of a something called
+matter, which it might have been without.
+
+\Subsection{INERTIA.}
+
+The inertness of matter has been touched upon on
+\Pageref{page}{70}, and here may be added the consideration of
+what interpretation could be put upon such phenomena
+as are exhibited by such a device as is represented by
+diagram 36, supposing it were enclosed in a box so one
+could not see the mechanism? The box enclosing it
+would exhibit a new quality of the nature of inertia,
+by virtue of the motions within it, which it would lose
+as the friction diminished the rate of motion, and
+when this stopped altogether the property would no
+longer be present. \emph{Hence, inertia, too, must be looked
+upon as probably due to motion.}
+
+\Subsection{MASS.}
+
+Mass, as a property of matter, is generally defined
+as the amount of matter considered, and is measured
+by what is called acceleration, that is, the velocity
+it acquires in a second when acted on by a constant
+force or push. Amount of matter is a very indefinite
+expression, but is often convenient, and seldom misleading
+\DPPageSep{361.png}{346}%
+\index{Atoms, as vortex rings}%
+when one is considering a given weight of a
+substance.
+
+One may speak of a pound of iron or of hydrogen
+as a mass of iron or of hydrogen, meaning a definite
+weight made up of a very large number of molecules
+of one or the other element; but if one will think of
+the atoms of these, and endeavor to form an idea of
+what can be the physical meaning of mass, when applied
+to one of them, he will at once see that the term
+carries with it no conception whatever of the physical
+difference between atoms of different kinds. An
+atom of iron is said to contain fifty-six times the mass
+of an atom of hydrogen, while an atom of gold has
+a hundred and ninety-six times the mass of the hydrogen
+atom, and all the elements differ in mass in the
+ratio of their atomic weights. Can any one suppose
+for an instant, that an atom of gold is a hundred and
+ninety-six times larger than an atom of hydrogen?
+There is some evidence that atoms differ somewhat
+in magnitude from each other, but none of any such
+difference as is represented by their atomic weights.
+Furthermore, this would imply that atoms were blocks
+of some primeval stuff of uniform quality, and that
+atoms of a given element were but uniform volumes
+of it; and it hardly needs to be said that such a view
+is negatived by all we know, for the properties of the
+various elements do not vary simply with their weights,
+as would be the case if they were thus constituted.
+Hence, mass as applied to atoms cannot be thus conceived.
+It is possible to form a conception of the
+physical meaning of mass as applied to atoms or
+\DPPageSep{362.png}{347}%
+molecules, by recalling the phenomenon of rigidity
+in position, which is the outcome of rotations, as described
+on pages \Pageref{}{40}~and~\Pageref{}{342}, for the amount of effort
+needed to move such a rotating body depends not
+simply upon the amount of rotating material, but its
+velocity of rotation; so a small amount of material
+with a high speed may offer as great a resistance to
+movement from its position as another much larger
+amount of material with corresponding slower rate,
+but otherwise the two would necessarily have great
+differences in their other properties; thus their rates
+of vibration would be very different, because their
+degrees of elasticity would be different.
+
+One may then assume that such differences between
+\emph{the atoms of the elements as are called their masses,
+are due to the relative rates of rotation}. This, of
+course, on the fundamental assumption that the atoms
+themselves are vortex rings such as we have argued as
+being highly probable.
+
+\Subsection{GRAVITY.}
+
+There now remains to be considered one more
+general property of atoms and all combinations of
+them; namely, their gravitative property. If one be
+content to say that not enough is known about it
+to warrant even a tentative opinion, and, therefore,
+refuses to draw any inferences from what is known
+as to what gravitative property is, or is like, one
+need to have no quarrel with such an one; but if,
+on the other hand, one is interested in fundamental
+questions, and thinks that whatever be the truth
+\DPPageSep{363.png}{348}%
+\index{Hertz waves}%
+\index{Materialists}%
+about gravitation or any other unsolved problem, when
+it is known, it will be seen to be in harmony with
+every other physical truth, and will, therefore, be a
+consistent part of the body of physical knowledge
+which we now possess, such an one will perceive that
+with the banishment of the old notions concerning the
+structure of matter, with its endowments of sundry
+properties which might have been otherwise, or that
+the matter we know might have had entirely different
+properties, must also go the notion of quality endowments
+in any such sense as was formerly held. He
+will also have good reason for holding it altogether
+probable, that if the other properties of matter are
+reducible to modes of motion, so the last one in
+the list will be found to be reducible to the same
+factor. If the others have been interpreted thus, one
+after another yielding as molecular phenomena became
+better understood, he will conclude that if the problem
+of gravitation has not been solved, as the others
+have been, it is not because it is insoluble in itself, but
+because it is inherently more difficult, or has not received
+the degree of attention that has been given to
+other problems since conservation has been discovered
+and forms a part of every discussion.
+
+One thing seems certain, if the vortex-ring theory
+of matter be true, or anything like it, then gravity
+must follow from the structure; for in the absence of
+any evidence of the existence of gravitation in the
+ether, no one is at liberty to postulate it there for
+the sake of finding it in the atoms. It must be looked
+for as due to the particular kind of motion that constitutes
+\DPPageSep{364.png}{349}%
+\index{Ether phenomena not explained}%
+the atom, and is constant because that motion
+is constant.
+
+In the chapter on gravitation is given a mechanical
+conception of gravitative conditions which, whatever
+may be its inadequacy, is consistent with other physical
+knowledge. Faraday, as is well known, made
+several efforts to discover some relation between
+gravitation and electricity, but only negative results
+were reached. He was not discouraged by his lack
+of success, and had planned still other experiments,
+which he was not able to finish. He always worked
+on some hypothesis almost always radically different
+from the hypotheses of his scientific contemporaries,
+and time has vindicated his rather than theirs; and
+that there must be some physical relation between
+the two classes of phenomena was one of his, and so
+it seems to-day; for if gravity be due to the form of
+motion in the atom, and if an electric current in a
+circuit represents a real vortex ring, having the conductor
+for its core, then it seems likely there is some
+gravitative effect between such current and the earth;
+but it may be so slight with a single circuit as to not
+be detectable with present means, and the mutual gravitative
+effects between two such circuits would be
+obscured by their electro-magnetic effects.
+
+Lastly, if the atom itself be a vortex ring, as
+explained in the chapter on the ether, it follows that
+in the absence of such form of motion there would
+be no atom---no matter, though the substance out of
+which the ring was constituted would exist, but without
+any of the characteristics that we assign to matter
+\DPPageSep{365.png}{350}%
+\index{Laws not compulsory}%
+\index{Miracles possible}%
+\index{Phenomena, unexplained}%
+in any of its forms. If one chooses to call a common
+smoke-ring \emph{alpha}, evidently when the ring is dissipated
+there is no more ring, there is no alpha, it has been
+annihilated as a ring; and in like manner, one may
+understand that what constitutes an atom is not so
+much the substance it is composed of as the motion
+involved in it. Such \emph{an atom is a particular form of
+motion of the ether in the ether}, in the same sense
+as what is called light is a form of motion of the
+ether in the ether. One is an undulation, the other
+a vortex. One we call an ether wave, the other we
+call matter: both involve energy, and both have properties.
+Thus, one after another of the properties of
+matter are found to be resolvable into ether motions,
+ether being the primal substance, and matter only one
+of its manifestations.
+
+Such a conception of matter as is here presented,
+resolving as it does all its physical properties, even
+itself, into modes of motion of the ether in the ether,
+is not simply a new conception of matter, it is rather
+a revolution in fundamental conceptions, and if trustworthy,
+necessitates an abandonment of nearly every
+notion concerning them which men have entertained
+when thinking and discoursing upon the subject.
+The mystery of phenomena is not lessened but made
+greater by the discovery that everything which affects
+our senses in every degree is finally resolvable into a
+substance having physical properties so utterly unlike
+the properties of what we call matter, that it is a misuse
+of terms to call it matter.
+
+No one in the past has been able to forecast its
+\DPPageSep{366.png}{351}%
+\index{Electricity, origin of}%
+properties. The necessity for such a medium has not
+been felt by many philosophers, and though there has
+been some expectation on the part of a few, any new
+\index{of}%
+step has been a source of surprise. For instance, when
+Hertz succeeded in producing electro-magnetic waves
+in the ether only two or three feet long, it was heralded
+as being a demonstration of the existence of the
+ether, implying that all the phenomena of induction
+and electro-magnetic waves developed by machines
+vibrating up to four thousand per second in telephonic
+apparatus, could have some other interpretation. The
+point here emphasized is that the properties of the
+ether and their relations to such physical phenomena
+as have been the subjects of research are so little
+known, that no one has yet ventured to embody them
+in an all embracing philosophy, so as to deduce apparent
+phenomena from them.
+
+The significance of this will be apparent when one
+recalls the various attempts of materialistic philosophers
+to explain all sorts of phenomena as due to
+matter and its properties. Some of them have been
+ignorant of the existence of the ether; others have
+grouped matter and ether together and called both
+matter, and considered both as subject to the same
+laws as are found to hold true for matter as defined
+in this book. When it is apparent that such physical
+views are radically unsound, that one cannot reason
+from our perceptual matter to imperceptual ether,---for
+it is true that there are no known nerves that
+respond directly to ether action,---it will also be apparent
+that any scheme of things that ignores this knowledge
+\DPPageSep{367.png}{352}%
+or fails to make proper distinctions here cannot
+be entitled to respectful consideration. Indeed, such
+physical materialism is less rational than ever, for it
+ignores much knowledge now in our possession which
+is as certain as any we possess, and it ignores the
+trend of all the physical knowledge we have; for it
+cannot be denied that the advance in knowledge which
+has been so marked during the past half century has
+been in the discovery of the simplicity of relations,
+rather than towards ultimate explanation. It may
+truly be said that, in a philosophical sense, nothing
+has been explained. Familiarity with constant phenomenal
+relations induces in us expectations of certain
+happenings, and presently they seem obvious.
+The car moves because the engine pulls it; the engine
+moves because the steam pushes it; the steam
+pushes because the heat pushes it; and the heat
+pushes because---it is the nature of heat to do work.
+In that way, every physical phenomenon runs at last
+into an inexplicable, into an ether question; and the
+necessity for it follows from nothing we know or can
+assume. No one may assume for an instant that the
+possibilities of ether phenomena are limited by such
+interactions as have hitherto found expression in treatises
+on physics. Indeed, there is already a body of
+evidence which cannot safely be ignored, that physical
+phenomena sometimes take place when all the ordinary
+physical antecedents are absent, when bodies move
+without touch or electric or magnetic agencies,---movements
+which are orderly, and more or less subject to
+volition. In addition to this is still other evidence of
+\DPPageSep{368.png}{353}%
+\index{Postulates of Physical Science}%
+\Pagelabel{356}%
+competent critical observers that the subject-matter
+of thought is directly transferable from one mind to
+another. Such things are now well vouched for, and
+those who have not chanced to be a witness have no
+\textit{a~priori} right from physics or philosophy to deny such
+statements. Such facts do not in any way invalidate
+physical laws, nor make it needful to modify present
+statements concerning energy. Physical laws are not
+compulsory; they \emph{rule} nothing; they are but statements
+of our more or less uniform experience. If
+these things be true, they are of more importance to
+philosophy than the whole body of physical knowledge
+we now have, and of vast importance to humanity;
+for it gives to religion corroborative testimony of the
+real existence of possibilities for which it has always
+contended. The antecedent improbabilities of such
+occurrences as have been called miracles, which were
+very great because they were plainly incompatible
+with the commonly held theory of matter and its
+forces, have been removed, and their antecedent probabilities
+greatly strengthened by this new knowledge;
+and religion will soon be able to be aggressive with
+a new weapon.
+%\DPPageSep{369.png}{354}%
+
+
+\Chapter{XV}{Implications of Physical Phenomena}{354}
+
+\index{Fable, La Fontaine's}%
+
+A physical phenomenon is a phenomenon which
+involves energy. Every change of condition in matter
+is brought about by the action of energy upon it in one
+way or another. It may be gravitative energy or heat
+or light or electric or any other; but every physical
+change has a physical antecedent as well as a physical
+consequent, and the explanation of any given phenomenon
+consists in pointing out the precise antecedents that
+brought it about. There is a common saying that like
+causes produce like effects, but this is far from being
+true in the popular sense. If it were true the development
+of science would not be the difficult and painfully
+slow process it has proved to be. Electricity may be
+produced by turning a crank, by dissolving a metal, by
+twisting a wire, by splitting a crystal, and in others
+ways. The product is the same, but the antecedents
+are so different that no one can tell by examining the
+product how it was produced. If it became important
+to know what caused the electrical phenomenon, it
+would not be sufficient to know that electricity could
+be produced in these different ways; one would need
+to know the specific apparatus employed. The more
+\DPPageSep{370.png}{355}%
+complicated the phenomenon the more difficulty there
+is in unravelling it.
+
+So far as experiment and experience have led us, the
+antecedents of every physical phenomenon are themselves
+physical, and more than that, all reactions are
+quantitative, that is, the product is proportional to the
+antecedent, and this is sometimes embodied in what is
+called the doctrine of the Conservation of Energy
+which every one knows about.
+
+The exchange relations between the different forms
+of energy,---mechanical, thermal, chemical, electrical,
+etc., which are so well-known, being quantitative, are
+therefore mathematical. They have therefore become
+a corporate part of the body of knowledge, and are no
+longer subject to any questions as to their validity
+under any circumstances whatever. One who should
+challenge them would no more be deserving of attention
+than if he should offer to prove he could square a
+circle.
+
+The fundamental postulates of physical science are
+binding upon the one who understands them, for the
+same reason that the multiplication table is. There
+are no contingencies and no possibilities of hedging.
+If any one of them could be overthrown the whole
+body of science would go with it. This is said because
+there are not a few who appear to think that
+what is called physical science may not be so certain
+as its advocates think, and that there may be factors
+which have not yet been reckoned with that may quite
+transform the whole scheme. Science is a consistent
+body of relations, not simply a classified body of facts.
+\DPPageSep{371.png}{356}%
+\index{Blavatsky, Madam, pretensions of}%
+\index{Guppy, Mrs.}%
+\index{Power, needed for rapid movement in air}%
+These relations have been discovered by experiment,
+not by deduction.
+
+Some of them are the following:---
+
+ 1. Physical changes affect only the condition of
+matter, not its quantity. One cannot create or annihilate
+it, nor can one element be changed into
+another.
+
+ 2. Every atom is continually exchanging energy
+with every other atom, the rate of the exchange depending
+upon their difference in temperature.
+
+ 3. The different forms of energy are transformable
+into each other, but the quantity of energy is not
+altered by the transformation.
+
+ 4. Complex organic molecules differ from simpler
+inorganic molecules in possessing more energy. The
+differences in this respect are definite, may be measured
+in foot-pounds, and are practically enormous.
+
+5. Every physical change has a physical antecedent,
+is therefore mechanical, and is conditioned by the laws
+of energy.
+
+These principles are the outcome of modern investigation,
+the evidence for them is overwhelming, and
+a working knowledge of them needs to be a part of
+the mental equipment of every investigator, especially
+of the one who takes it as his province to explain
+phenomena.
+
+Science is strong here if it is anywhere; and any
+description of any event, any explanation of a genuine
+phenomenon that practically ignores these, cannot be
+true, and can have no claim to consideration.
+
+Before any explanation is needed there is always the
+\DPPageSep{372.png}{357}%
+\index{Sound, origin of}%
+\index{Spiritualistic theory}%
+\index{Spirit disembodied}%
+advisibility of ascertaining that the alleged event really
+happened, and whatever is not professedly miraculous
+must not be in discordance with the bast knowledge
+we have.
+
+With the above principles in hand one is prepared to
+fairly judge as to whether a given statement is credible
+or not. It is not necessary, as some seem to suppose,
+that one should be able to explain a phenomenon if he
+rejects the explanation of another one, or to assert with
+emphasis whether a thing is possible, probable, or
+impossible.
+
+In La Fontaine's fable the philosophers were at the
+theatre witnessing a play in which Ph{\oe}bus rose in the
+air and disappeared overhead. They undertook to explain
+the phenomenon. One says Ph{\oe}bus has an
+occult quality which carries him up. Another says
+he is composed of certain numbers that make him
+move upward. Another says Ph{\oe}bus has a longing
+for the top of the theatre, and is not easy till he gets
+there. Still another says Ph{\oe}bus has not a natural
+tendency to fly, but he prefers flying to leaving the
+top of the theatre empty. Lastly, a more modern
+philosopher thinks that Ph{\oe}bus goes up because he
+is pulled up by a weight that goes down behind the
+scenes. The last is an explanation. From a physical
+standpoint the others are not simply inadequate explanations,
+they are absolute nonsense. They make
+the antecedents of a phenomenon involving energy,
+factors that have no more relation to energy than has
+moonshine to metaphysics. Yet there has been a large
+number of men in all ages, men able in many ways
+\DPPageSep{373.png}{358}%
+too, who have ventured to explain phenomena in such
+a \emph{non-sequitur} way, and who have spurned the mechanical
+philosopher and his explanations.
+
+In that class of phenomena called spiritualistic there
+is a large body of reputed physical phenomena, vouched
+for by large numbers of witnesses, such as the movements
+of furniture, chairs, tables, books, pianos, etc.,
+the playing upon musical instruments, guitars, accordions,
+pianos, the appearance of lights, of faces, of
+full forms clothed, of conversations with materialized
+spirits, and so on, in great variety.
+
+I suppose no one doubts that to move a body of any
+magnitude requires the expenditure of energy, and to
+do a definite amount of work requires always the same
+amount of energy, yet I suspect there are many persons
+who give credence to statements of occurrences
+which practically deny the above proposition, thinking
+it to be probable that spiritual agencies may have
+control of powers that mankind knows nothing about.
+This may be true enough, but the question is not as to
+what this or that agency can do, but whether if spirits
+do a certain kind of work it takes less energy than if a
+man should do the same thing.
+
+Whenever a weight or a resistance and a velocity
+are given, it is always possible to compute the energy
+spent to produce or maintain it. Let us study a case
+or two. In olden times it was related that one of the
+prophets was carried through the air by the hair of his
+head from Babylon to Jerusalem. In later times it
+was said that Mrs.\ Guppy was similarly transported
+from Edinburgh to London. The distance is about $400$
+\DPPageSep{374.png}{359}%
+\index{Séances, phenomena at}%
+miles, and if I remember rightly she made the transit
+through the air in less than one hour. This makes the
+velocity to be about seven miles a minute or $600$ feet
+per second, which is three times faster than the highest
+tornado velocity. The resistance offered by the air
+to the movement of bodies in it is very well known.
+Pressure in hurricanes has been observed as high as $90$
+pounds per square foot, and as the pressure increases
+with the square of the velocity, it follows that at $600$
+feet per second the pressure per square foot would be
+about $800$ pounds; and if the exposed surface of Mrs.\
+Guppy was no more than six square feet, the total air
+pressure must have been not less than $4,800$ pounds.
+Now, the energy of this is found by multiplying the
+pressure by the velocity per second.
+\[
+4,800 \times 600 = 2,880,000\text{ foot-pounds,}
+\]
+and as a horse-power is equal to $550$ foot-pounds per
+second, it follows that it took not less than
+\[
+\dfrac{2,880,000}{550} = 5,236\text{ horse-power}
+\]
+to move Mrs.\ Guppy in that way at that rate.
+
+It was reported when Madam Blavatsky was living
+that she was in the habit of receiving letters from
+distant correspondents, brought to her by some occult
+agency and dropped upon her table. These letters
+were said to have been written only a few minutes
+before by persons living in the most distant parts of
+the earth.
+
+It takes but a little figuring to discover the amount
+of energy necessary to do a work of this kind. Thus,
+\DPPageSep{375.png}{360}%
+\index{Light, a sensation}%
+let the distance be $10,000$ miles, the time ten minutes.
+The pressure per square foot due to such a velocity in
+the air will be $17,000,000$ pounds, or $118,000$ pounds
+per square inch. Assume but one square inch as the
+area exposed to such a pressure, then the energy
+needed to transport it with the speed of $16.6$ miles
+per second, will be
+\[
+\dfrac{118,000 \times 5,280 \times 16.6}{550.} = 18,000,000\text{ horse-power.}
+\]
+
+Unless such packages were protected by occult
+agencies also, they would be burned up before they
+had gone the first mile of their journey.
+
+The popular idea is that at death the spirit leaves
+the body, but that it may, and often does, remain
+in the locality, and is frequently in the presence of
+its friends, unperceived by them, though occasionally
+they may be seen and communed with through the
+agency of certain preternaturally gifted persons called
+mediums.
+
+This proposition has so many physical data, and involves
+so many physical implications, it will be worth
+the while to look squarely at some of them.
+
+1. A spirit is supposed to be a conscious entity dissociated
+from matter, having ability to move at will and
+to be more or less interested in what is going on in the
+world, and capable of giving information on matters
+remote from observation or the knowledge of men.
+Suppose then such an entity, a disembodied spirit,
+without a corporeal body, but anxious to be in the
+neighborhood of its former friends. Seeing that it
+\DPPageSep{376.png}{361}%
+\index{Light, its nature}%
+now has, according to this view, no longer a hold upon
+matter, it has ceased to be in any way affected by
+gravity and inertia, for these are attributes of matter.
+Now the earth has a variety of motions in space; it
+turns on its axis, so that a point on the equator is
+moving at the rate of a thousand miles an hour. It revolves
+about the sun at the rate of nearly seventy thousand
+miles an hour, and with the sun and the rest of
+the bodies that make up the solar system it is drifting
+in space at the speed of sixty thousand miles an hour
+or more, so that the actual line drawn in space by any
+point upon the earth is a highly complex curve drawn
+at the rate of upwards of a hundred and twenty-five
+thousand miles in an hour. Now, any object whatever
+keeping up with the earth, but without the help of
+gravity, must maintain the velocity in space of not less
+than a hundred and twenty-five thousand miles an hour,
+and that is not all, as the movement is not in a straight
+line, any such object wishing to keep in a particular
+locality, say a room, would have to be on the alert constantly,
+for the earth wabbles\DPnote{** [sic]} for numerous reasons and
+what seems to us, who have bodies held by gravitation
+to the earth, as so quiet and smooth running that we
+are never conscious of the motion for an instant, is so
+simply because gravity takes care of us. Once surrender
+that and undertake to depend upon some supposed
+private source of energy, and one would instantly
+discover he had an engineering problem of a high degree
+of complexity. If one assumes, as some have
+done, that such spirit is composed of, or associated
+with, some sort of matter, and that navigation is accomplished
+\DPPageSep{377.png}{362}%
+\index{Materializations and energy}%
+by an act of the will, it will not change the
+foregoing factors in the problem at all.
+
+2. Suppose, as some have done, that disembodied
+spirits lose their hold upon matter, and that they do
+not remain at the earth. Then, if they remain at the
+point where separation from the body took place, in an
+hour the earth will have moved forward one hundred
+and twenty-five thousand miles. But over the earth
+there is certainly a death every minute all the time,
+and such are left in the rear by the earth never to return
+to them, for the movement of the earth is not a
+circuit, but an apparently endless drift. Think of the
+dead of the earth for the thousands of years since man
+has lived upon it! On this view, the spirits might be
+seen like the tail of a comet reaching backwards for
+millions on millions of miles,---the trail of the dead.
+
+In any view, time and space and energy cannot be
+ignored or ruled out.
+
+At \emph{séances} the reported phenomena are mostly of a
+physical sort, the trance of the medium being a physico-mental
+phenomenon. The phenomenon of sound implies
+the expenditure of energy, it is a vibratory motion
+of the air or other elastic body, and in order to produce
+it some antecedent force must be spent; it may be produced
+by mechanical means, or heat, or electricity, or
+by the muscles. Its production does not imply any
+specific method any more than articulate speech implies
+a person, as Faber's talking-machine and the
+phonograph prove.
+
+Let us consider some of the more subtle phenomena
+that are reported. First, as to so-called conditions.
+\DPPageSep{378.png}{363}%
+\index{Organic and inorganic matter, difference between}%
+One of the primal ones of these for such phenomena as
+the movements of bodies and materializations, is said
+to be darkness. This is of so much importance that it
+must be fully attended to. To one who has not paid
+any attention to what has been done in molecular
+science within the past fifteen or twenty years, the
+phenomena of light may and probably do seem to be
+due to an unique agency, as much as heat or electricity;
+and therefore he looks upon light as he looks
+upon the others in the hierarchy of the physical
+sciences, and expects that in its absence a potent
+agency or kind of energy is lacking. That this idea
+and conclusion is all wrong will be apparent when it is
+recognized that \emph{what we call} light is a particular sensation
+in the eye, and that to produce the sensation
+\emph{there is no one antecedent that is essential}. Press the
+eye with the finger in the darkest night and one will
+see a ring of light with great distinctness. An electric
+shock, a bump upon the head, will also give one the
+sensation of light, and in the absence of other aids to
+a judgment no one could tell what was the antecedent
+of a given light sensation.
+
+Radiations from a luminous body, and reflections
+from a non-luminous one, were not long ago thought to
+consist of three different kinds of rays,---heat, light, and
+actinic rays. It has been discovered that there is no
+such distinction in fact. What a ray will do depends
+upon what it falls upon. The same ray that falls upon
+the eye and produces the sensation of light, would heat
+another body, or do photographic work. The only
+difference in rays is in their longer or shorter wave
+\DPPageSep{379.png}{364}%
+\index{Immortality}%
+lengths, and the energy of a wave does not depend
+upon its length. From this it follows that there is no
+such thing as light as distinguished among forces or
+forms of energy. \emph{Light is a sensation}, and in the absence
+of eyes no such distinction could possibly be discovered.
+Light, then, as a particular kind of agency
+takes no part in phenomena outside of the eye. The
+eye of man is adapted to respond to certain wave
+lengths, the eyes of other animals are adapted to respond
+to other wave lengths; and if our eyes were
+adapted to perceive all wave lengths the whole universe
+would be always light about us, every object,
+whatever its temperature, could always be seen as
+easily as we now see when the sun shines.
+
+These facts make it quite impossible for a physicist
+to understand why darkness should be an essential
+condition for the occurrence of such phenomena as
+are described. Again, every ray of light when traced
+back leads to a vibrating molecule or atom. Indeed,
+light or ether waves in general all imply vibrating
+atoms or molecules; and what is called spectrum analysis
+is but a development of this fundamental principle,
+and not only the kind of matter, but its physical
+condition is revealed. If Moses had had a spectroscope
+when he saw the burning bush it might have
+told him the nature of that conflagration.
+
+So when luminous forms appear at a dark \textit{séance},
+there is first the ether waves of such length as to
+affect the eye; these traced to their source must
+arise from vibrating molecules, that is, matter expending
+energy in the production of ether waves;
+\DPPageSep{380.png}{365}%
+for no matter ever shines without some source of
+energy.
+
+If the matter that gives out the light be ordinary
+matter, there is no difficulty in understanding it; for
+matter can be made to shine in several ways,---by
+impact, by high temperature, by electric vibrations,
+by chemical reactions; and no one could tell from
+the simple fact that the matter shone, what the origin
+was. But it is said that these forms that are seen
+and thus affect the eye, that are touched and thus
+affect the sense of touch, that are warm and thus
+testify to vibrating molecules, that speak and appeal
+to the ear through air vibrations, are \emph{materializations};
+meaning by that that the body with its various organs
+and their functions is built up \textit{de novo} out of material
+at hand, as Adam was said to be made of the dust of
+the ground, and as the lion that pawed to free its
+hinder parts from the soil out of which it thus grew.
+What are the materials that make up a human body?
+Ultimately there are carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen,
+iron, phosphorous, sulphur, potassium, sodium, and
+several other ingredients of less importance. From a
+hundred to a hundred and fifty or more pounds of these
+are needed for one full-grown person.
+
+Many of the materializations that have been described,
+from Samuel the prophet to Katie King, have
+appeared to be veritable specimens of humanity even
+to avoirdupois and all that is implied in that. If the
+matter of such bodies was a creation and not a collocation,
+then one of the fundamental principles of
+physics is simply not true; for matter can be created
+\DPPageSep{381.png}{366}%
+\index{Seeing, what is implied in}%
+and annihilated by any spirit that knows how to find
+a suitable medium. If the material is gathered from
+the environment---and this sometimes is asserted---then
+the difficulty is nearly as great.
+
+One must take notice of the difference there is
+between inorganic or relatively simple chemical compounds
+and those that make up the bodies of living
+things,---the bones, the tissues, the muscles, the nerves,
+the brain, the blood. For building up a single pound
+of such tissue as muscle or of fat requires the expenditure
+of energy represented by about sixteen million
+foot-pounds; and as in such a body as we are supposing
+there could hardly be less than twenty-five or thirty
+to be so reckoned, it follows that not less than four
+hundred million foot-pounds of energy is necessary, a
+quantity equal to upwards of twelve thousand horsepower,
+if done in a minute; and if done in half a
+minute, then twice that quantity. I cannot but wonder
+if those who think they have witnessed such phenomena
+could have been conscious of the stupendous
+amount of energy which was being evolved before their
+eyes. Then dematerialization involves the annihilation
+of the same amount; for it is to be remembered that
+organic matter differs from inorganic in the amount of
+energy absorbed. There has been either the creation
+and annihilation of matter or the creation and annihilation
+of an enormous amount of energy, without antecedents
+and with no residuals. This is not saying that
+such events have not taken place, it only points out the
+factors of energy which are implied if they do happen.
+
+One who is unaware of such implications and phenomena
+\DPPageSep{382.png}{367}%
+\index{Hearing, what is implied in}%
+may easily suppose the most improbable things
+can take place. Those who are aware of such implications
+cannot hear of such events without instantly perceiving
+how almost infinitely improbable they are.
+
+Reports of such phenomena have never come from
+any man who understood the relations of phenomena.
+
+Scientific men have been often told of their incompetency
+to investigate so-called psychical phenomena;
+but if the latter involve physical phenomena, then who
+else can properly investigate them?
+
+This paper is not to be understood as implying that
+there is no relation between the living and the dead,
+for the writer does not believe that doctrine; instead
+of that he thinks we are very near to a discovery of a
+physical basis for immortality that will transform most
+all our thinking. If spiritual communication is not
+accompanied with physical phenomena in the alleged
+way, it does not follow that it may not happen in other
+ways that do not do such violence to our fundamental
+knowledge as most of the reported cases do. The universe
+is large, not much of it has been explored. We
+live and move and have our being in an environment
+about which our knowledge is most meagre; but our
+knowledge of energy we get not only from the earth,
+but from the sun and most distant stars and nebulæ,
+and it is not probable that any contribution whatever
+will materially modify our present knowledge of it.
+
+Thus far I have considered what is always implied
+when physical phenomena are considered, especially
+with reference to the antecedents; for instance, when
+a steam-engine is run it implies the consumption of
+\DPPageSep{383.png}{368}%
+\index{Senses}%
+fuel, which in turn implies molecular structure, and a
+definite amount of energy in what is called its chemical
+form. That energy is not created or destroyed by
+any physical process, and, therefore, every exhibition of
+energy, no matter where or when, is to be explained
+solely by reference to the laws of energy which are
+now so well known as to have passed out of the region
+of conjecture or hypothesis. If there be any knowledge
+which man possesses, which for certainty and
+accuracy compares with mathematical knowledge, it is
+the knowledge of physical relations. I traced out a
+few cases in which the alleged phenomena were of
+such a physical sort as to be easily handled, and
+showed how one must look at their antecedents. That
+such phenomena did take place was not denied. It
+was simply asserted that when they did happen one
+must reckon with the implications, unless he was prepared
+to affirm that physical phenomena might happen
+when physical laws are ignored and quite counted out.
+There are yet some further implications it is well to
+consider. They have to do with the objective structure
+and qualities of the spiritual beings that are
+supposed to bring about the phenomena we are considering,
+such as moving objects, playing upon musical
+instruments, writing upon slates, and so on.
+
+As such beings are always addressed as if they were
+visible personages, possessing the same organs of hearing,
+seeing, and so on, as are possessed by individuals
+still having a material body; and as the replies to questions
+never contradict such assumptions, but, on the
+contrary, are confirmatory of such assumptions, it follows
+\DPPageSep{384.png}{369}%
+that one may properly consider what really is
+implied in the assumption that spirits have eyes and
+ears, because they can see and hear. When I say \emph{I
+see}, I assert not only the existence of what we call
+light, but the existence of an organ called the eye, the
+structure of which is adapted to be acted upon by what
+we call light. Light is, as we all know, a wave-motion
+in the ether. It travels at the great velocity of a hundred
+and eighty-six thousand miles in a second, and the
+waves are in the neighborhood of only the one fifty-thousandth
+of an inch long. The eye is the only
+structure in the body that can perceive these waves.
+It is a kind of camera, and photographic work goes on
+in the retina very much as it does in the process of
+photography. Then, there is the optic nerve, which is
+an essential part of the apparatus, and conveys to the
+seat of consciousness the impress of the molecular
+disturbances which have taken place in the eye. No
+one is conscious of the phenomenon of light except
+through the action of this complex mechanism. Therefore,
+when one says he \emph{sees}, he means that a particular
+kind of disturbance has taken place in a particular physiological
+structure. The term sight is never used in a
+different sense from this, except when it is avowedly
+used figuratively. In the absence of ether waves there
+could no more be what we call sight than if there were
+no eyes; both are essential.
+
+When, then, it is said or admitted that a spirit \emph{sees},
+not in a figurative sense, but in the sense in which we
+all use the term, it is implied that a spirit has eyes, a
+physiological structure, acted upon by ether waves, and
+\DPPageSep{385.png}{370}%
+\index{Law, physical}%
+\index{Specialists}%
+the nervous system behind that. It has what \emph{we} call
+eyes. It will not do at all to say that such spirit has
+an equivalent sense, for whatever that might be it
+would certainly not be \emph{sight}. One may get a very
+accurate knowledge of the presence of another person
+by the voice, or by the sense of touch, but it
+would be a culpable misuse of language to say of such
+person that he was \emph{seen}. Sound can no more affect
+the eyes than light can affect the ears. This, then, is
+the same as saying that a spirit has a physical structure
+for seeing similarly constituted to that in man,
+and, indeed, in all organizations that \emph{see}.
+
+When I say \emph{I hear}, I mean that air vibrations have
+affected my organs of hearing, the ears with the nervous
+structure between the ear and the seat of consciousness.
+There is implied in the statement not
+only that sound vibrations of a definite sort have been
+produced and are acting, but that they are acting upon
+a certain physiological structure adapted to be affected
+by gaseous vibrations. Vibrations in the ether cannot
+affect the organ of hearing. The media are radically
+different, and cannot be used as substitutes for each
+other; and it is therefore wrong to say \emph{I hear}, unless
+what I perceive reaches my consciousness through the
+physiological mechanism called the auditory apparatus.
+In a figurative sense one may say he hears as he may
+say he sees.
+\begin{verse}
+ \small
+ ``Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutored mind \\
+ \PadTo{``}{}Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.''
+\end{verse}
+
+But real seeing and real hearing imply certain distinct
+\DPPageSep{386.png}{371}%
+organs adapted to different physical conditions.
+One cannot, by talking, affect one's eyes; nor will
+light waves, as such, affect one's ears.
+
+Suppose, then, in a \textit{séance}, when a spirit is addressed
+thus: Will the spirit please rap upon the table? and
+the answer comes at once,---a rap distinctly heard. The
+question was an oral one, and was produced by physical
+means, regular sound vibrations, and can be heard
+by such beings as are possessed of the proper organs
+to be acted upon by air vibrations, that is, ears; and
+by ears I \emph{mean} ears, not substitutes of any sort. What
+we call \emph{speech} is absolutely impossible in a vacuum,
+as much as is sound, for speech is a succession of
+sounds. There are numerous substitutes for speech,---signs
+made with the fingers or lips that do not appeal
+to the ear; but these are not speech. If, then, spirits
+\emph{hear}, it is because they have ears, organs that can be
+affected by sound vibrations in the same manner as we,
+the so-called living beings, can be. Moreover, do not
+all testify that they can and do both see and hear?
+
+In like manner one may treat of the sense of feeling,
+or any other sense. All imply a molecular structure, a
+nervous organization, indeed, everything that goes to
+make up a consciousness of the external world such as
+is possessed by living beings governed by physical
+laws.
+
+It is clear that what we call pain is immediately due
+to disordered nervous structure, and in the absence of
+nerves could never be known. This can be tested in a
+minute by any one, by simply pricking one's finger.
+Does not the destruction of the nervous tissue in any
+\DPPageSep{387.png}{372}%
+manner end the possibility of pain? Can a spirit
+then suffer physical pain without a nervous organization?
+By pain I mean what all mean by the
+term, the sensation which, if severe and long-continued,
+results fatally to the sufferer, because the
+nervous tissue is itself destroyed.
+
+If some one having read so far, perhaps with impatience,
+should say, ``All this may be as you say for living
+beings, incorporated in a body of flesh and blood
+and a nervous system, but we are not to suppose for
+a moment that spirits are thus constituted, and if not,
+then they are not to be supposed to be conditioned by
+such physical laws as all common matter is conditioned
+by. They have their own constitution, different enough
+from ours, and one cannot reason from our condition to
+theirs.'' To this I would reply, that if one cannot do
+this, if a physicist must not carry his terms and conceptions
+into this spiritual domain, for precisely the
+same reason the spiritualist must not talk about a spirit
+\emph{seeing}, \emph{hearing}, \emph{feeling}, and so on, unless he admits he
+is talking loosely, and means by those terms only to
+symbolize his conceptions, and has to employ such
+terms as best convey the idea, which idea cannot be
+physically true. Even then it is very difficult to understand
+why, if the physical terminology is inappropriate,
+any one should at a \textit{séance} ask such a question aloud as,
+If John be present will he please rap on the table; for
+this is \emph{sound} addressed to an ear---both of which are
+purely physical things.
+
+An Arab may not have any difficulty in imagining a
+genie that may be summoned by rubbing a cup, to do
+\DPPageSep{388.png}{373}%
+wonderful things, and then vanish out of relations to
+everything; but no one who has studied deeply into
+the significance of physical relations can possibly admit
+that affairs in nature go on in such a fast-and-loose
+way.
+
+Thus far I have considered such relations of physical
+phenomena as have been found by experience to hold
+good in the whole range of physics---such relations as
+properly come under the domain of what is called law,
+and by law I mean mathematical precision, both in the
+antecedents and the results. With the exception of
+the original apparition of matter and of physical energy,
+there has not been found in the whole field of physics,
+by any investigator of any nationality, any kind of a
+phenomenon which is believed to be unexplainable on
+the basis of the knowledge of physical science we
+already possess. Of course, what we call explanation
+is merely presenting the antecedent factors of a given
+occurrence, both in quality and quantity, and a thing is
+fully explained when these are given so fully as to leave
+no reasonable doubt as to their sufficiency in the mind
+of one who is properly well acquainted with the data;
+but the data that enter into a given phenomenon are
+the very things most persons know least about; and a
+given explanation may be full and adequate, and yet, to
+some, seem to be wholly insufficient.
+
+In these days one often hears about \emph{specialists}---of
+their limited knowledge and inadequate preparation for
+giving a judgment in other fields than their own. So it
+has come to be reckoned that if a man has, by study
+and investigation in a given field, made himself a competent
+\DPPageSep{389.png}{374}%
+judge, so as to be considered an authority in
+that field, he is by so much less fitted to be heard in
+the settlement of some question foreign to that field;
+whereas some other man who is not known to have
+done anything in any field, may be called in for judgment,
+to the exclusion of the former, lest his increased
+knowledge in some one department should disqualify
+him elsewhere.
+
+Do we not hear that biologists are incompetent
+judges of mental phenomena, that astronomers are not
+competent in biological questions, and so on? If this
+distinction be true to the extent generally assumed,
+then philosophy itself is impossible; for if a man's
+opinion can be good only in a small department of
+knowledge, and he cannot adequately master more, how
+shall we ever know the relationships that constitute
+philosophy? The truth is, this is a one-sided affair
+altogether, and holds true from but one standpoint. If
+an astronomer propounds a chemical theory of the sun,
+will it be needful in any degree that the chemist who
+reviews the work shall have even studied astronomy
+or paid the slightest attention to telescopes or solar
+affairs? If chemical science is involved, it is for the
+chemist to say whether what is propounded is adequate
+or not. That is to say, the man who concerns himself
+with the constitution of the sun must so far be a
+chemist, but a man may be a chemist and never concern
+himself about the sun.
+
+Again, if a biologist who is admittedly ignorant of
+chemical and physical science makes statements that
+plainly contradict the laws of energy as determined in
+\DPPageSep{390.png}{375}%
+\index{Science, no one independent}%
+chemistry and physics, and if a physicist challenges the
+statements, shall the latter be silenced by calling him a
+specialist who may be competent enough in his own
+field, but who knows nothing of biology? Or shall he
+be told that physical laws may be rigorous enough in
+one mass of matter, but not in another? Is it to be
+believed that physical laws thus play fast and loose?
+Here the arithmetic holds good, but there all is indefinite,
+and would not this be a fine example of dictation
+out of one's field? Physiologists tell us that ultimately
+every physiological problem reduces itself to one of
+chemistry and physics.\footnote
+ {See Appendix, \Pageref{p.}{400}.}
+If this be so, is it not plain
+that the one who treats broadly of biological problems
+must either be a physicist or submit his work to the
+criticism of a physicist? But a man may be a physicist
+and never trouble himself about biological questions.
+
+If a social philosopher presents a scheme for ameliorating
+the evils present in society, in which scheme he
+plainly ignores the laws of life as determined by biologists,---as
+if such laws were not the very determining
+factors which must first be reckoned with,---shall not
+the biologist condemn such work? and shall he, too, be
+told that however much he knows of biology, he is incompetent
+in sociology? Plainly, not so. But is this
+process a reversible one? Can the sociologist criticise
+the biologist's work unless he be himself a biologist, or
+the biologist criticise the chemist's or physicist's work
+unless he be so far a chemist or physicist? He certainly
+cannot; and this shows that there is a certain
+relationship among these subjects in which there is an
+\DPPageSep{391.png}{376}%
+\index{Séances, phenomena at}%
+order of dependence. In order to fully understand and
+explain a sociological problem, a knowledge of psychology
+is essential; a working knowledge of biology,
+or the laws of life, and no adequate knowledge of this
+can be had without a preparation in chemistry and
+physics.
+
+In this there is nothing new, but it is generally
+ignored by most persons who treat on broad questions.
+It is plain that every kind of a question is, in the last
+analysis, referable to the laws of physical phenomena,
+and from these there is no appeal. There are not
+many who like this, it is true; but the test for truth
+is not what one likes or dislikes, but whether the
+proposition is in accordance with the best and most
+fundamental knowledge we have. Some of those fundamental
+truths discovered within the past fifty years,
+and not questioned by any one who can stand an
+examination on them, were given on \Pageref{page}{356}; and
+whoever sees, or thinks he sees, a phenomenon which
+he interprets in a way which plainly contradicts or
+ignores those laws, does not so much have a contention
+with any man as with science itself. If those laws are
+not irrefragably true, then we have no science at all,
+no philosophy, knowledge is scrappy, and what we call
+the interdependence of phenomena is a myth.
+
+Some of the phenomena alleged to happen at spiritual
+\textit{séances}, such as levitation of human bodies, writing between
+closed slates, the moving of matter without contact,
+and so forth, are said to be as thoroughly proved
+as any of the facts of the fundamental knowledge I
+have treated. Such a statement cannot have come
+\DPPageSep{392.png}{377}%
+from any one who knows how the knowledge I spoke
+of was obtained, or how it may be verified by anybody
+who cares to take the pains. None of it depends in
+any degree upon anybody's dictum. If any one has
+doubts as to the constitution of water, he can determine
+it himself in half a dozen different ways. If
+he doubts that the earth is eight thousand miles in
+diameter, he can measure it in several ways. If he
+thinks a pound of coal does not have eleven million
+foot-pounds of energy, he can himself try it and be satisfied.
+Any one can satisfy himself by himself; assistance
+of others is only a convenience, not a necessity,
+and the fundamental statements are now believed by
+so many because so many have tested them, and all
+have reached the same conclusion. Furthermore, great
+commercial enterprises are founded upon some of them,
+as when so much limestone and coal are mixed with a
+given ore of iron for its reduction. So if such alleged
+facts be true, it cannot be true they are as thoroughly
+proved as the ones I stated, and they will not be so
+proved until each one can be verified in like manner.
+
+There is another excellent reason for denying that
+they are proved in any scientific sense. All physical
+phenomena, so far as they have become a part of physical
+science, have been examined and reported upon by
+physicists; and both phenomena and their interpretation
+have been the subject of remorseless criticism,
+and have been adopted, if at all, on \emph{compulsion}; their
+acceptance has been a matter of last resort. This is
+true in all departments. Why should one believe that
+the world turns round unless there is no other possible
+\DPPageSep{393.png}{378}%
+\index{Growth of crystals}%
+way to explain and account for all the facts which must
+be reckoned with in any explanation? The theory itself
+is so remote from the common experience of mankind
+that nobody suspected it for thousands of years, and it
+is not at all obvious to one who is not acquainted with
+phenomena out of the range of ordinary experience.
+The form of the earth, the aberration of light, the
+apparent change of latitude, and so forth, have to be
+considered even more than the recurrence of day and
+night. For most of the purposes of life it does not
+matter whether it turns round or not, and most men
+have no interest in the question further than that it
+accords or not with their other beliefs and feelings.
+But the answer to the question, ``Does it turn?'' is
+not one that can be settled by submitting it to the vote
+of the world. The judgment of one Galileo is worth
+more than that of all the rest of the world on that
+point. Once admit that no department of science is
+independent of other departments, and that no phenomenon
+occurs independent of relations which must
+be satisfied by any attempted explanation, and it follows
+that no explanation of an event should be adopted
+and be considered a part of science, unless it is shown
+to be in agreement with what is known. Hence, if an
+event is reported which appears to be out of relation
+with those established relations which there is general
+agreement upon, there is the best of reasons for thinking
+that either the event did not happen, or that it did
+not happen as reported, especially if the one reporting
+it is unacquainted with the variety of ways in which it
+is possible to do the same thing. If one sees a wheel
+\DPPageSep{394.png}{379}%
+\index{Physicists, prepossessions}%
+turning round but does not see its connections, how can
+he tell whether it is turned by muscular action or water-power
+or wind-power or gravity or heat or electricity
+or magnetism, every one of which is capable of turning
+a wheel? Even if he can see the connections, he cannot
+always tell what makes the wheel go without further
+investigation. Air and steam will make a water motor
+go as well as water itself, and the presence of electrical
+devices would not insure that the wheel was turned by
+electricity, and the absence of such electrical devices
+would not insure that it was not driven by electrical
+agency. Hence the testimony of witnesses only, even
+though they were otherwise competent, would be of
+little weight in deciding what made the wheel go. If
+the question were one of any importance it could be
+determined only by a competent investigator with
+proper appliances, and unhindered by restrictions of
+any sort. One cannot trust his sense of sight implicitly.
+Many persons have lost fingers because the
+buzz saw looked as if it was still; and it is easy with
+the zoetrope, and in other ways, to produce the impression
+of movements that are not taking place; so it
+might be that after all the wheel was not turning, or
+even that there was no wheel at all.
+
+Admitting, for the argument's sake, that the alleged
+phenomena at \textit{séances} are real occurrences and must
+be accounted for, there are certainly three different
+possible ways:---
+
+1. By more or less skilfully devised tricks, and fraudulent
+only in the attempt to make others believe they
+are not tricks. To be certain they are not the results
+\DPPageSep{395.png}{380}%
+of manipulative skill on the part of some one, only a
+skilful juggler might be able to find out. It is known
+that hundreds have been thus imposed upon; and skilful
+jugglers, such as Hermann and Maskaline, who have
+investigated many such, declare themselves satisfied
+that the whole of it is trickery.
+
+2. Suppose some of the surprising things done are
+not the results of conscious duplicity, then it may be,
+as most interested persons contend, the work of disembodied
+spirits who, through the agency of mediums,
+do apparently the most absurd and irrational things,
+but are never willing or able to do the simplest reasonable
+thing to satisfy a competent judge; who mutter no
+end of maudlin rubbish, add nothing of wisdom or
+knowledge to mankind, and justify Professor Huxley
+in saying that if such is the state of the dead we have
+another good reason against suicide.
+
+3. There are a small number who think some of the
+\emph{phenomena} to be genuine, but who attribute them not
+to spirits, but to some obscure physical force not yet
+understood, and but little investigated. This is the
+attitude of Professor Crookes, and of the Milan experimenters.
+
+As to the class that is satisfied with the spiritistic
+interpretation, it may be remarked that such an explanation
+is in accordance with the attempts of the race
+to give a rational explanation of all kinds of phenomena.
+In the absence of proper knowledge, what
+seems simpler or more natural than to assume some intelligent
+agency as the cause of any obscure event?
+This it was that peopled the mountains, glens, trees,
+\DPPageSep{396.png}{381}%
+\index{Knowledge, rapid growth of}%
+and rivers with unseen beings, watchful and interested
+in the affairs of men. The more ignorant, the closer
+was the fetich; the more enlightened, the higher these
+agencies retreated into the sky, useful now chiefly for
+literary and artistic purposes. For some reason it has
+always been discreditable to be without some theory
+for all sorts of occurrences, and even to-day, in the
+most enlightened communities, a man is liable to be
+denounced for his stupidity or his cowardice if he says,
+about some matters, I don't know. It is said, however,
+that some of the phenomena at \textit{séances} bear the marks
+of intelligence such as do not belong to natural occurrences,
+and that it is a fair inference that other minds
+than the witnesses are present. When Kepler discovered
+that the planets moved in elliptical orbits
+instead of circular ones as had been supposed, he felt
+bound to give some reasonable explanation of the facts.
+He knew of nothing but intelligence that could maintain
+such motions, and he therefore supposed that each
+planet must have some guiding spirit. When the law
+of gravitation was applied, it was found that a circular
+orbit was the only unstable orbit in the system, and
+that gravity alone was sufficient to account for the
+order, the harmony, and all the variety of motions; so
+the spirits were dismissed from further duty. When a
+spider has a leg grow to replace one that has been lost,
+it has been held to be due to intelligent action superior
+to ordinary chemical and physical action. When a
+crystal of quartz is seen to replace a part accidentally
+lost, so as to complete its symmetry before it begins to
+grow elsewhere, it appears as if mind was at work here
+\DPPageSep{397.png}{382}%
+quite as much as in the other case, only in the latter most
+persons are content not to follow the implications, for
+they quickly see the philosophical rocks ahead. The
+real truth is that the further one pursues the causes
+of phenomena the more clearly does it appear unlikely
+that disembodied intelligence is behind any particular
+phenomena.
+
+Among all those who make up the great class of
+believers in the spiritualistic theory of physical phenomena,
+there is not a single physicist; that is, not one
+to whom one would go for an explanation of any complicated
+physical process. It is assumed that he is no
+better qualified to investigate \textit{séance} phenomena than
+others who do not know what to expect and look out
+for in simpler cases, and that he is unreasonable if he
+does not accept the statements of untrained observers
+as being as good as his own observations.
+
+It is true that he has some prepossessions. He does
+not believe the multiplication table should be trifled
+with. He knows that most things may be done in
+many different ways, independent of appearances. He
+knows a man may sometimes not perceive what is
+plainly before his eyes, simply because he was not
+looking for it. He deems it right to exhaust the
+possibilities of the known before summoning some
+unknown and hypothetical factors in any given case.
+He knows it to be well-nigh impossible for a man to
+give an entirely accurate account to-day of what occurred
+yesterday. He knows that a photograph is a
+better witness of an event, and that a stenographic
+report of statements made is more reliable than any
+\DPPageSep{398.png}{383}%
+\index{Miracle defined}%
+man's memory. He knows that the interpretations of
+events by mankind have never been true interpretations,
+and that the general beliefs of mankind have
+never been confirmed by science in any particular, and
+that, so far as anything has been settled, it has been
+decided against the opinions and judgment of mankind
+and its leaders. He is aware that his key has unlocked
+every one of the doors in Doubting Castle that have
+been unlocked, and therefore he believes that the
+implications of physical science as a whole are against
+any generally received interpretation of any event that
+has not been subjected to its scrutiny.
+%\DPPageSep{399.png}{384}%
+
+
+\Chapter[The Relations of Physical and Psychical Phenomena]%
+{XVI}{The Relations of Physical and Psychical
+Phenomena\protect\footnotemark}{384}
+
+\footnotetext{Read before the Psychical Congress, Chicago, August, 1893.}%
+
+% Set manually
+\SetRunningHeads{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}{Physical and Psychical Phenomena}%
+
+\First{Knowledge} has grown apace within the past fifty
+years. It is generally admitted that more has been
+acquired in this time than in all the preceding centuries.
+Furthermore, the knowledge thus acquired has
+not been simply an addition to the mental possessions
+of former days; it has instead been of such a kind as
+to completely overthrow nearly all former notions of
+nature and its mode of operations, and the new product
+can hardly be allowed to be an outcome of the work of
+earlier men. It is in the nature of a catastrophe where
+old continents have sunk and new ones have arisen
+from old ocean beds.
+
+This generation lives in a new world, with new environments,
+new ideas, new explanations, new philosophy,
+new ideals, and new beliefs. We have new astronomy,
+new chemistry, new physics, new psychology, new natural
+history, and everybody is on the \textit{qui vive} to know
+what can possibly come next. This does not mean
+that nature goes on in a different way from what it had
+hitherto done, but that we have mentally grasped a new
+\DPPageSep{400.png}{385}%
+\index{Mental processes imply physical conditions}%
+and transforming idea. We have reached an elevation
+from which it is possible to survey a broader field, and
+can interpret phenomena better because their relations
+are better perceived, and because of this it is seen that
+the old interpretations were all wrong, and, indeed,
+were worthless, because not true. While all this is
+granted readily by most thoughtful persons, there are
+not a few who recognize the changed opinions in the
+various sciences and philosophy in general, who are not
+at all persuaded but what the present philosophy of
+things, which is dubbed evolution, is only a passing
+phase and may itself presently give way to some
+new and possibly truer conceptions, being content to
+be mildly agnostic on such matters, and willing to wait
+with patience for more light. There are some who
+think the new philosophy does not take account of all
+the known factors, if, by chance, there may not be
+unknown factors of as much or more importance than
+any which have been included, and which a final philosophy
+of things will certainly include; and such object
+strenuously to the limitations which the current philosophy
+seems to set to knowledge and to the ideals
+of the race.
+
+The man of science hears rumors of phenomena
+which are said to be as certain as any in his own field,
+which he has never investigated, and which cannot
+come into his category of related things. Some of
+these reported happenings are as marvellous as any
+miracles that have been recorded. Persons of undoubted
+probity have reported phenomena taking place
+in their presence which, if true, give credence to many
+\DPPageSep{401.png}{386}%
+things for which in the past men and women have been
+burned to death as wizards and witches. Thus, I have
+an acquaintance, an eminent man not given to romancing,
+who assures me he has seen, in undimmed light, a
+chair ten feet from any person rise as if some one had
+hold of its back and come and set itself down by his
+side. Something of the same kind is said to have taken
+place in the Milan experiments of last fall. Mr.\
+William Crookes tells us that the weight of a body has
+been changed to be more or less according to an effort
+of the will of Mr.\ Home, and likewise in Milan the
+weight of the medium varied as much as fifty pounds.
+
+Now, there have been numerous attempts to define a
+miracle for the purposes of philosophy, and usually it
+is not the thing accomplished so much as the means
+adopted for doing it. The antecedents of the event
+are supposed to be other than the usual ones which
+might do the same thing. Thus, a chair may be moved
+by a person who lifts it and carries it to a new place;
+but the chair may be pushed by a stick or pulled by a
+string to a new place, while no one touched it, and all
+who have been to see Hermann, and other magicians,
+have seen things move about in a surprising manner
+when no one touched them. In such cases it is
+believed that none but well-known means are skilfully
+used to produce such displacements, and that any one
+might learn the art if it were worth his while. In other
+words, no one thinks he is looking at a miraculous
+event at a magician's show, no matter how surprising
+the thing done; but if any person should be able to
+make a chair, or an object, move from one place to
+\DPPageSep{402.png}{387}%
+\index{Consciousness implies energy}%
+\index{Mind and energy}%
+another without the mechanical adjuncts of some sort
+which are needed by others, by an act of will rather
+than by the employment of what we call energy, such
+a person is able to work what has always been called a
+``miracle.'' His method of doing that thing is a super-natural\DPnote{** Only instance.}
+method, which is not the gift of every one even
+in the slightest degree; for any one can try and satisfy
+himself as to whether he can, by any simple act of will,
+make the tiniest mote in a sunbeam or the most delicately
+poised needle move in the slightest degree.
+This is the common experience; and because it has
+been found by experience that matter never moves
+except when some other body has previously acted
+upon it with a push or a pull, it has come about that
+we have reduced the experience to the statements
+embodied in so-called laws of motion, have found them
+to be justified and without any exception so far as
+investigation has gone, and this, too, by a multitude of
+persons for two hundred years. As modern science
+rests upon a mechanical basis, as it is concerned altogether
+with the phenomena of matter and the relations
+of the phenomena, and as these have been found in
+every case that has been fully investigated to conform
+to mathematical laws rigorously, not partly or dubiously,
+is it not much more probable that any other phenomenon,
+no matter what, that involves matter and its
+changes, does conform strictly to the general laws,
+than that these laws are sometimes inoperative?
+
+Probably the whole thing resolves itself into this:
+Are the fundamental properties of matter variable?
+Some of the phenomena alleged to happen at \textit{séances}
+\DPPageSep{403.png}{388}%
+imply that they are. How strong the case is against
+such assumption, I think is not perceived by many persons
+who give credence to the happenings, but who are
+not well equipped with physical knowledge. Many persons
+seem willing enough to admit physical laws and
+physical processes in what they take to be the field of
+physics, but they hold that there are other fields just as
+certain, and among such, mind, that controls matter and
+its forces, and to which it is not necessarily subject;
+that it is perfectly philosophical to think that mind may
+exist independent of matter and its relations, and be
+able in this condition to control phenomena.
+
+Let us examine this. Assume that every physical
+process in the world should be suddenly stopped, so
+there should be no change. That would mean that all
+motions were stopped. There would at once be neither
+day nor night, for these are due to the earth's rotation;
+no light, for light is a wave motion; there would
+be no heat, for heat is a vibratory motion; there
+would be no chemical changes, for they depend upon
+heat; there would be neither solid nor liquid nor
+gas, for each depends upon conditions of temperature,
+that is, of heat, which is assumed to be absent; there
+would be no sight, for that implies wave motions; nor
+sound, for that implies air waves; nor taste, for that
+implies chemical action; nor smell, for like reason; nor
+touch, for that implies pressure---the result of motion.
+The heart would cease to beat, the blood to flow, and
+consciousness would be stopped. Every one of the
+senses would be obliterated or annihilated; nothing
+would happen, because there would be no change anywhere.
+\DPPageSep{404.png}{389}%
+Every phenomenon in the world of sensation
+would be stopped, because every phenomenon in the
+physical world had stopped; which is the same as saying
+that all we call sensations are absolutely dependent
+upon physical changes, going on all the time independent
+of our will or choice, and which cannot be controlled
+in the slightest degree by anybody. Every
+phenomenon of every kind, then, consists in, as well
+as is dependent upon, matter and its motion, and there
+is in the whole range of experience no example of any
+kind of a phenomenon where matter, ordinary matter,
+is not the conditioning factor. There is no known case
+where force or energy is changed in degree or direction
+or kind but through the agency of matter. Every kind
+of a change implies matter that has thus acted. What
+is called the correlation of forces means that one kind
+is convertible into some other kind of energy, as heat
+into mechanical energy in the steam engine. But the
+engine, a material structure, is essential for the change.
+What is called the conservation of energy means that
+in all the exchanges energy may undergo, as heat into
+light, or work of any kind, the quantity of it does not
+vary. The matter, as such, does not add to, or subtract
+from it; hence only a material body can possess energy,
+and a second material structure is necessary in order
+that the energy of the first should be changed into any
+other form. So it appears there must be at least two
+bodies before anything can possibly happen.
+
+This all means that what we call energy is embodied
+only in matter, and that what we call phenomena is but
+the exchange of energy between different masses of
+\DPPageSep{405.png}{390}%
+\index{Mind and matter}%
+matter; also that these exchanges take place with
+mathematical precision, else prediction would be impossible,
+and computation a waste of time.
+
+Now, assume that the physical structure of an individual
+was kept intact, and that every atom and molecule
+in the body maintained its relative position after all
+motions had ceased. Assume, too, that the mind or
+soul, or whatever one chooses to call the conscious
+individuality, was present and capable as ever of acting
+upon the material structure; can a single atom be
+moved in the slightest degree? If any be moved, then
+energy has been expended, energy which must have existed
+elsewhere or have been created \textit{de novo}. For conscious
+perception, whether sight or sound or any other,
+motions embodying energy are essential, as pointed out;
+and hence, to produce any perception, some motions
+would necessarily have to be initiated, and to initiate
+them energy from some source must be supplied.
+All the energy the matter had has been destroyed
+according to the assumption; so, if any movement has
+begun, it must have been created or produced from some
+other unthinkable condition which was not energy, in
+some such sense as matter is supposed to have been
+created, in which something is made out of nothing.
+The demand is for creative power. Admit for the
+argument's sake that it is done, and matter begins to
+move in any kind of a way; so far it possesses energy,
+physical energy as embodied in matter. Call the
+amount of it ``A.'' Now, if the original condition of
+things was established, so far as the amount of energy
+was concerned, which may be called ``B,'' then the
+\DPPageSep{406.png}{391}%
+\index{Phenomena, unexplained}%
+\index{Psychics}%
+whole amount of energy is ``A plus B.'' It will make
+no difference in this sum if one supposes that the
+original motions and energy were not interrupted; for
+if, on account of mind action, any particle moves more
+or less than it would have done with its original supply,
+then something has been added to the store of energy
+in matter, and what is called the conservation of energy
+is not true.
+
+Until all phenomena have been examined, there will be
+obscure happenings and things to be explained by some
+one who can; but it is no final explanation of anything
+to say, ``A man did it,'' or ``An intelligence did it.''
+What kind of changes, that is, what kind of phenomena,
+the forms of energy we are now acquainted with are
+capable of producing no one can now limit, certainly
+not one who has not been to the pains to understand
+how the simple ones take place. I have often been
+told that things cannot move in certain ways, or certain
+things cannot be done except by intelligent action
+or guidance; but it may be remembered that Kepler
+thought guiding spirits were needful for making the
+planets move in their elliptical orbits. If one must
+explain an obscure phenomenon, is it not wisest to explain
+it in accordance with what we know rather than in
+accordance with what we do not know? It is better for
+one to acknowledge his ignorance of the cause of it, than
+to go romancing for a reason, and repudiate all we really
+do know and its implications. A juggler may do the
+most surprising things before one's eyes, but if one
+cares to inquire into the antecedents of anything done
+he will have no difficulty in tracing it as far as the
+\DPPageSep{407.png}{392}%
+\index{Thought transference}%
+breakfast. What is meant is, the juggler does nothing
+which does not require energy,---energy of the ordinary
+sort, in the same sense as if it had been required
+for sawing wood or walking up the street. As for consciousness,
+dexterity, and all that is implied in both, I
+pointed out a little way back there could be neither in
+the absence of those changes which constitute physical
+phenomena; and that not only life itself, but consciousness
+as we know it, would be impossible without the
+exchanges in the energy embodied in the cellular structure
+of the brain. In the light of what has been accomplished
+in the direction of physiological psychology, it
+is entirely unwarrantable to assume that even thinking
+can go on in the absence of physical changes of measurable
+magnitude; and this is the same as saying that
+what we call intelligent action is physical at its basis.
+
+There is such a formal agreement as well as actual
+connection between conscious life and the life of the
+brain, that it is not to be supposed any one who has properly
+attended to the facts will venture to deny them.
+Argue as one will, it is true there is no experimental
+knowledge that is a part of science, of consciousness
+separable from a material structure called brain, in which
+physiological changes take place as the conditions for
+thinking as well as for acting. This is the only known
+relation of mind and body. However this association of
+such apparently different provinces is to be explained,
+it is still true that for every phenomenon in consciousness
+there is a corresponding phenomenon in matter.
+Psychologists have pointed out that the phenomena indicate
+an identity at bottom between the activity of
+\DPPageSep{408.png}{393}%
+consciousness and cerebral activity. To follow this out
+into particulars would be interesting and perhaps profitable
+to most; but the significance of it here is that even
+in the psychological field, where the opportunities for investigation
+are right at hand and most is known, there
+is no evidence for consciousness apart from a material
+structure, or that the law of conservation of energy does
+not hold as strictly true here as elsewhere in physics.
+So there is no experimental reason for assuming the
+existence of incorporeal intelligences. There is no
+psychological question that is not at the same time a
+physiological question.
+
+Experimentally it appears that the association of mind
+with matter and energy is not of such a nature that one
+is at liberty to assume their dissociation, any more than
+one is at liberty to assume gravitation or magnetism as
+independent existing somethings controlling matter according
+to certain laws. So any hypothesis invented to
+account for an occurrence that is not yet explained ought
+not to be in contradiction to everything else we know,
+and ought not to be entertained except as a last resort;
+and the hypothesis of disembodied intelligences acting
+now in and now out of the field of material things is
+such an one. If such phenomena really happen at
+\textit{séances} as are alleged, then we have to do with affairs
+strictly within the line of physics, whether such phenomena
+are so-called mental or so-called physical. It is
+useless to affirm that the two are such radically different
+phenomena that the methods of the latter are not
+appropriate in the former; and the extensive laboratories
+for physiological psychology, which are now
+\DPPageSep{409.png}{394}%
+being established in all the larger institutions of
+learning, is a sufficient denial of the proposition.
+
+The term psychics is intended to denote something
+different from the phenomena of psychology as manifested
+in a given organism. It is supposed to relate to
+the sympathetic relation of one mind to that of another
+quite apart from the ordinary physical relations, that is,
+from the senses. As for the mind-reading as exhibited
+some years ago by Brown and others, I believe it is now
+agreed that it is due to the sense of touch, and cannot
+be done without contact. In hypnotic work there has
+to be ``suggestion,'' and most of the very remarkable
+cases, such as those in France last winter, have been
+shown to be gross frauds. But let it be granted that
+some of it is genuine, that it is possible in some cases
+to impart information and discover the thoughts of
+another without the common resources, it does not
+then follow that the method is extra-physical. If only
+here and there is to be found an individual called a
+psychic, who is thus sensitive, and it is not a race
+endowment, one no more need to summon a mysterious
+supernormal agency to account for it, than such is
+needed for the work of Newton or Mozart. Because a
+phenomenon has not been explained, and no one knows
+how to explain it, is no reason at all for supposing there
+is anything mysterious about it. There are any number
+of phenomena throughout nature that have not
+been explained, and no one knows how to explain on
+the basis of what is known. Such, for instance, is the
+whirlwind that crosses the field, raising dust and leaves
+into the air. No one has explained the soaring of birds,
+\DPPageSep{410.png}{395}%
+no one knows what goes on in an active nerve, or why
+atoms are selective in their associates. Ignorance is
+not a proper basis for speculation; and if one must have
+a theory, let it be one having some obvious continuity
+with our best physical knowledge.
+
+What is here given is not intended to be a denial that
+such phenomena as thought-transference, or even the
+most surprising things such as those described in the
+Milan experiments, take place. It is only intended to
+emphasize the probability that whatever happens has a
+physical basis, and is therefore explained only when
+these physical relations are known.
+\DPPageSep{411.png}{unnumbered}%
+%[Blank Page]
+
+
+\Appendix
+\DPPageSep{412.png}{397}%
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{57}.}
+\Pagelabel{400}%
+
+\First{As} to whether it is considered as known that the sum of
+the interior angles of a plane triangle are exactly equal to
+one hundred and eighty degrees: ``Suppose that three points
+are taken in space, distant from one another as far as the
+sun is from $\alpha$~Centauri; and that the shortest distance between
+these points is drawn so as to form a triangle. And suppose
+the angles of this triangle to be very accurately measured
+and added together; this can at present be done so accurately
+that the error shall certainly be less than one minute,
+less therefore than the five-thousandth part of a right angle.
+Then I do not know that this sum would differ at all from
+two right angles; but I also \emph{do not know that the difference
+would be less than ten degrees}, and I have reasons for not
+knowing.''
+\AppendixCite{W.~K. Clifford:}{Aims and Instruments of Scientific Thought.}
+
+``If the Euclidian\DPnote{** [sic]} assumptions are true, the constitution
+of parts of space at an infinite distance is as well known as
+the geometry of any portion of this room. So that here we
+have real knowledge of something at least that concerns the
+cosmos; something that is true throughout the immensities
+and the eternities. That something Lobotchewski\DPnote{** [sic]} and his
+successors have taken away.''
+\AppendixCite{W.~K. Clifford:}{Philosophy of the Pure Sciences.}
+\DPPageSep{413.png}{398}%
+
+``In this case the universe as known becomes a valid conception,
+for the extent of space is a finite number of cubic
+miles. If you were to start in any direction whatever, and
+move in a perfectly straight line according to the definition
+of Liebnitz,\DPnote{** [sic]} after travelling a most prodigious distance \ldots
+you would arrive at---this place.''
+\AppendixRef{\textsc{Ibid.}}
+
+``It must remain an open question whether, if we had
+large enough triangles, the sum of the three angles would
+still be two right angles.''
+\AppendixRef{\textit{Enc.\ Brit.\ 9th~ed., Art.\ Measurement.}}
+
+``It is true that according to the axioms of geometry, the
+sum of the three angles of a triangle are precisely one hundred
+and eighty degrees; but these axioms are now exploded,
+and geometers confess that they, as geometers, know not the
+slightest reason for supposing them to be precisely true.
+That they are exactly that amount is what nobody can be
+justified in concluding.''
+\AppendixCitePage{C.~S. Peirce:}{Monist,}{vol.~i.\ No.~2, p.~174.}
+
+``All that we need do is to call the attention of those who
+busy themselves with mental philosophy to this generalization
+of geometry as one of the results of modern mathematical
+research which they cannot afford to overlook.''
+\AppendixCite{George Chrystal,}{in Enc.\ Brit., Art.\ Parallels.}
+
+Such as care to look into the matter further will find
+the subject treated in an untechnical way in the works of
+W.~K.~Clifford, in the chapters on the ``Theories of the
+Physical Forces,'' ``Aims and Instruments of Scientific
+Thought,'' and especially the ``Philosophy of the Pure Sciences.''
+There is much on it in the \textit{American Journal of
+Mathematics}, vols. \i.~and~ii., also in the ``Proceedings of the
+Royal Society,'' Edinburgh, vol.~x., 1879, and in article
+``Measurement,'' \textit{Enc.~Brit.}
+\DPPageSep{414.png}{399}%
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{208}.}
+\Pagelabel{402a}%
+
+In 1881 the author discovered how electric ether waves
+could be produced and identified, where the vibratory rates
+were as high as $4000$ or more per second, by employing
+static telephones detached and removed many feet from
+the inducing electric current. These gave a wave length
+of $\frac{186000}{4000} = 46+$ miles long. Hertz, Tesla, and others have
+since then described methods of producing them so short
+as to be but a few feet long. When they have thus been
+mechanically shortened so as to be but the one forty-thousandth
+of an inch in length, they will be seen by the eye as
+red light.
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{242}.}
+\Pagelabel{402b}%
+
+See Maxwell's ``Theory of Heat,'' pp.~160, 161.
+
+\settowidth{\TmpLen}{$\dfrac{H}{S} = \dfrac{h}{T}$.}
+\begin{wrapfigure}[2]{l}{\TmpLen+\parindent}
+\hfill\smash{$\dfrac{H}{S} = \dfrac{h}{T}$.}
+\end{wrapfigure}
+\noindent $S$~and~$T$ are the absolute temperatures of the
+hot and cold bodies in Carnot's engine. $H$
+and $h$ are the quantities of heat taken up and given out.
+When $T = 0°$, $h = 0$, when $h$ is the equivalent of the work
+done. As this is $0$ at absolute zero, no work could be done
+in changing the volume of a substance at that temperature.
+There can be no cohesion among the molecules or atoms, for
+this would require that work should be done to separate
+them. It is the temperature of \emph{dissociation}.
+
+This conclusion is one to which chemists and physicists
+have been led by their researches. For example, Dr.\ Lothar
+Meyer says, ``At the lowest temperature to which we can
+attain, the majority of chemical reactions studied under
+these conditions have been found to cease or to proceed
+very slowly, so that it would appear to be very probable that
+at the absolute zero, viz., $273°$, a temperature much below
+the lowest yet attained, chemical action would cease altogether
+from the absence of any form of heat motion whatsoever;
+so without heat there would be no exertion of the
+so-called chemical affinity.''
+\AppendixRef{\textit{Modern Theories of Chemistry}, §~211.}
+\DPPageSep{415.png}{400}%
+
+\Note{Note to \Pageref{Page}{277}.}
+\Pagelabel{403}%
+
+The hypothesis of a ``vital principle'' is now as completely
+discarded as the hypothesis of phlogiston in chemistry.
+No biologist with a reputation to lose would for a
+moment think of defending it.
+\AppendixCitePage{John Fiske:}{Cosmic Philosophy,}{vol.~i.\ p.~422.}
+
+``We can demonstrate the infinitely manifold and complicated
+physical and chemical properties of the albuminous
+bodies to be the real cause of organic or vital phenomena.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Haeckel:}{History of Creation,}{vol.~i.\ p.~330.}
+
+``The aim of modern physiology is to conceive all organic
+processes as physical or chemical.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Höffding:}{Outlines of Psychology,}{p.~57.}
+
+``Physiologists must expect to meet with an unconditional
+conformity to law of the forces of nature in their inquiries
+respecting the vital processes. They will have to apply
+themselves to the investigation of the physical and chemical
+processes going on within the organism.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Helmholtz:}{Scientific Lectures,}{p.~384.}
+
+``A vital element, i.e., an element peculiar to organisms,
+no more exists than does a vital force working independently
+of natural and material processes.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Claus \& Sedgwick:}{Zoölogy,}{part~i.\ p.~10.}
+
+``In Physiology the word life is understood to mean the
+chemical and physical activities of the parts of which the
+organism consists.''
+\AppendixCitePage{B. Sanderson:}{Nature,}{vol.~xlviii., p.~613.}
+
+``Modern physiology interprets the phenomena of organic
+life by means of physical and chemical laws. An appeal to
+`vital force' or to the intervention of mind, it does not
+recognize as an explanation of an organic phenomenon.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Höffding:}{Outlines of Psychology,}{p.~10.}
+\DPPageSep{416.png}{401}%
+
+``Physiology thus appears as a branch of applied physics,
+its problems being a reduction of vital phenomena to general
+physical laws and thus ultimately to the fundamental laws
+of mechanics.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Wundt:}{Lehrbuch der Physiologie,}{p.~2.}
+
+``It must not be supposed that the differences between
+living and not living matter are such as to justify the
+assumption that the forces at work in the one are different
+from those to be met with in the other.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Huxley:}{Art.\ Biology, Enc.\ Brit.,}{p.~681.}
+
+``Zoölogy, the science which seeks to arrange and discuss
+the phenomena of animal life and form as the outcome
+of the operation of the laws of physics and chemistry.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Lankester:}{Art.\ Zoölogy, Enc.\ Brit.,}{p.~803.}
+
+``If corporal functions are mediated by immaterial
+agencies, physiological science is impossible.''
+\AppendixCitePage{G.~Stanley Hall:}{Amer.\ Jour.\ Psychology,}{vol.~iii.\ p.~74.}
+
+``It has not occurred to me that any one now uses the
+term `vital force' in any other way than as a convenient
+method of expressing the sum total of the physical and
+chemical activities of organisms.''
+\AppendixCite{Prof.\ E.~L. Mark,}{Harvard University.}
+
+``These phenomena of life, though they may not as yet be
+physically and chemically explained, are certainly not to be
+referred to the working of any special \emph{vital force} peculiar
+to organisms\ldots. We have to do here with the same
+forces and the same substances that we meet with elsewhere
+in nature.''
+\AppendixCitePage{Lang:}{Textbook of Comp.\ Anat.,}{London, 1891, p.~2.}
+
+``Modern science has allowed the vitalistic theory (\textit{vitalismus})
+to drop; instead of by means of a special vital force,
+it explains irritability as a very complex chemico-physical
+phenomenon. It is only distinguished from other chemico-physical
+\DPPageSep{417.png}{402}%
+phenomena of inorganic nature by degree, namely,
+that the external stimuli come in contact with a substance
+of complicated structure, an organism, and correspondingly
+produce in it also a series of complicated processes.''
+\AppendixCitePage{O.~Hertwig:}{Die Zelle und die Gewebe,}{p.~75, 1893.}
+
+``I know of no authority in recent years which recognizes
+a distinct vital force; all students of nature, so far as I am
+aware, explain all the phenomena of life by means of physical
+and chemical forces.\DPtypo{}{''}
+\AppendixCite{Prof.\ J.~S. Kingsley,}{Tufts College.}
+
+%\DPPageSep{418.png}{403}%
+% [** PP: Not small-capping first index entry]
+
+\normalsize
+\clearpage
+\fancyhf{}
+\cleardoublepage
+
+\IndexBookmark
+\fancyhead[C]{\textsc{INDEX}}
+\printindex
+
+\iffalse
+Action at a distance 88
+
+Absolute zero 242, 336
+
+Affinity, chemical 240
+
+Albumen, size of molecule 15
+
+Ampère turns 209
+
+Arcturus 145
+
+Arc light 216
+
+Atmosphere, height of 26
+
+Atoms 10, 18, 19
+
+Atoms, unalterable 21, 22
+
+Atoms, life associated with 24, 296
+
+Atoms, chemical properties 239
+
+Atoms, as vortex rings 349
+
+Atoms, vibrations of 243
+
+Attraction, gravitative 83, 309
+
+Attraction of vibrating fork 87
+
+Attraction of disks 94
+
+Attraction depends upon distance 85
+
+Attraction of vortex rings 95, 244
+% \indexspace
+
+Blavatsky, Madam, pretensions of 359
+
+Bonnenburger's apparatus 40
+
+Boiling-point pressure 125
+% \indexspace
+
+Cause and effect 75
+
+Camera 162, 163
+
+Catalysis 248
+
+Cell structure 280
+
+Charles, Law of 336
+
+Chemism 238
+
+Chemism and heat 241, 336
+
+Chemical field 247, 305
+
+Chemical effects 218
+
+Chemical origin of electricity 177
+
+Chemical reactions depend on temperature 336
+
+Cohesion, in solids and liquids 332
+
+Cohesion, destroyed 333
+
+Colors 165
+
+Color-blindness 171
+
+Color, nature of 339
+
+Combustion 103
+
+Conductivity, electrical 190, 192
+
+Consciousness implies energy 390
+
+Corti's fibres 275
+
+Corn, life of 291
+
+Crookes' tubes 224
+
+Crystallization 245, 249, 306
+% \indexspace
+
+Decomposition of water 218
+
+Density 6
+
+Diamond, hardness of 338
+
+Dissociations 131, 219
+
+Dispersion 138
+
+Dynamo 213
+% \indexspace
+
+Ear 274
+
+Earth, velocity of, in space 34
+
+Earth, diameter of 55
+%\DPPageSep{419.png}{404}%
+
+Earth, a magnet 303
+
+Earth, curvature 69
+
+Earth, solidity of 126
+
+Egg 291
+
+Echo 265
+
+Efficiency of machines 213
+
+Elasticity 341
+
+Elasticity due to motion 39, 341
+
+Elements 136
+
+Energy, factors of 70, 77
+
+Energy in the ether 79, 105
+
+Energy. What determines transfer 214
+
+Energy, unknown, preface.
+
+Electricity, origin of 174, 229, 354
+
+Electricity, thermal 174
+
+Electricity, mechanical origin 180, 230
+
+Electricity, magnetic origin 181
+
+Electricity, electrical origin 182, 230
+
+Electrical antecedents 186
+
+Electrical effects 231
+
+Electrical effects, reversible 232
+
+Electricity, dual 234
+
+Electricity, activity 194
+
+Electrical field 196, 300
+
+Electrical stress 197
+
+Electrical waves 198, 303
+
+Electro-magnets 81, 210
+
+Electric lamps 215
+
+Energy of translation 64
+
+Energy of vibration 66
+
+Energy of rotation 68
+
+Ether 26, 32, 34, 80
+
+Ether, a non-conductor 191
+
+Ether waves 134
+
+Ether wave qualities 134
+
+Ether phenomena not explained 352
+
+Ether waves, their source 135, 207
+
+Ether pressure 205
+
+Ether rotations 234
+
+Explosion products 71
+% \indexspace
+
+Fable, La Fontaine's 357
+
+Falling bodies 60
+
+Falling bodies, energy of 60
+
+Fibres of Corti 275
+
+Fields, physical 298
+
+Fields, chemical 247, 305
+
+Fields, electrical 196, 300
+
+Fields, magnetic 202, 214, 252
+
+Fields, mechanical 247
+
+Fields, thermal 298
+
+Flames 137
+
+Foot-pound 60, 62
+
+Food 284
+
+Foster, Dr.\ Michael, quoted 296
+
+Force, vital 279
+
+Friction, its effects 23, 34
+
+Fuels 103
+% \indexspace
+
+Galvanic battery 178
+
+Gas, motion in 333
+
+Gas, free path in 334
+
+Gas, pressure in 334, 336
+
+Gas, destroyed 336
+
+Gaseous absorption 142
+
+Geometry 56, 57 % Appendix.
+
+Geometry@{Appendix.}
+
+Geissler's tubes 223
+
+Goose, work in flying 65
+
+Gravitation 82, 90, 309, 347
+
+Gravitation, law of 84
+
+Gravity, specific 7
+
+Gravity follows from structure 348
+
+Growth 250, 292, 310
+
+Growth of crystals 283, 381
+
+Growth of lobster 283
+
+Gunpowder 103
+
+Guppy, Mrs. 359
+
+Gyroscope 342
+% \indexspace
+
+Hair-cloth loom 312
+
+Hardness not atomic property 338
+%\DPPageSep{420.png}{405}%
+
+Hearing, what is implied in 370
+
+Hertz waves 344, 351
+
+Helmholtz 35
+
+Heat, mechanical origin of 99
+
+Heat, chemical origin of 102
+
+Heat, electrical origin of 104
+
+Heat, radiational origin of 105
+
+Heat, mechanical equivalent 109
+
+Heat unit 112
+
+Heat, effects 123, 254, 335
+
+Heat by impact 225
+
+Heat of the sun, origin of 119
+
+Heat, nature of 115, 118
+
+Hypothesis, needful 94
+
+Hypothesis, gravitation 90
+
+Hydrogen vibrations 116
+% \indexspace
+
+Impenetrability 340
+
+Immortality 24, 367
+
+Inertia 70, 345
+
+Induction coils 208
+
+Inductive action 183, 195, 250, 302
+% \indexspace
+
+Joule 110
+
+Jupiter, temperature of 144
+%[**missing \indexspace]
+
+Kepler, the guesser 90
+
+Kinetics 46
+
+Kinematics 46
+
+Knowledge, rapid growth of 384
+% \indexspace
+
+Laws not compulsory 353
+
+Law, physical 373
+
+Lever 317
+
+Life 277 % Appendix.
+
+Life@{Appendix.}
+
+Life, definitions of 278
+
+Light, a sensation 135, 363
+
+Light, energy of 80
+
+Light, its velocity 26, 28
+
+Light, its nature 27, 80, 134, 364
+
+Light waves 207
+
+Lightning 185, 223
+
+Lighting, electric 214, 222
+
+Luminous effects 222
+% \indexspace
+
+Matter, living 283, 294
+
+Matter, characteristic property 4
+
+Matter, its definition 4
+
+Matter, divisibility of 8
+
+Matter, effect of temperature upon 132, 336
+
+Matter, as modes of motion 331
+
+Matter, states of 332
+
+Mass 345
+
+Materialists 351
+
+Materializations and energy 365
+
+Mars, atmosphere of 144
+
+Mars, signalling to 217
+
+Machines 312, 325
+
+Magnetic field 202, 204, 214, 252, 303
+
+Magnetic induction 208
+
+Magnetic rotation 235
+
+Magnetic waves 81, 202, 207, 344
+
+Magnet, electro 81
+
+Mathematics 89
+
+Mechanical field 307
+
+Medium, necessity for 29
+
+Mental processes imply physical conditions 388
+
+Meteors 21, 26, 64
+
+Mercury 55
+
+Miracles possible 353
+
+Miracle defined 386
+
+Mind and energy 390
+
+Mind, a material habitat for 24
+
+Mind and matter 24, 393
+
+Mirrors 147
+
+Microscope, magnifying powers 15, 149
+
+Molecules, size of 13, 18, 46
+
+Molecules, loaded 160
+
+Molecules, long free path 224
+%\DPPageSep{421.png}{406}%
+
+Molecules, number of, in universe 124
+
+Motion, kinds of 46, 48, 49, 145
+
+Motion, velocity of 50
+
+Motion, transformations of 314
+
+Motion, molecular and atomic 49
+
+Motion, laws of 70, 73
+
+Motion, antecedent of 72
+
+Molecular fatigue 78
+
+Molecular stability 281
+
+Momentum 74
+
+Motor, electric 212
+
+Muscles 286
+
+Muscular work 67
+
+Musical sounds 268
+
+Musical ratios 269
+
+Musical instruments 271
+% \indexspace
+
+Newton, Sir Isaac 30, 82, 83, 88
+
+Nerves, their functions 288, 290
+
+Nebula theory 97
+
+Neptune, discovery of 89
+
+Noise 269
+% \indexspace
+
+Ohm's law 189
+
+Organic and inorganic matter, difference between 366
+% \indexspace
+
+Phenomena, nature of 59
+
+Phenomena, unexplained 353, 394
+
+Phenomena physical, implications
+
+of 354
+
+Photography 156
+
+Phosphorescence 226
+
+Physical fields 298
+
+Physical universe a machine 330
+
+Physical processes, reversible 232
+
+Physicists, prepossessions 382
+
+Pitch 259
+
+Plating, electro 221
+
+Polarization of molecules 178, 219
+
+Postulates of Physical Science 356
+
+Power, needed for rapid movement in air 359
+
+Potential, electrical 189
+
+Principia 31, 70
+
+Prism 138
+
+Protoplasm 280
+
+Psychics 394
+
+Pulley 317
+
+Purpurine 169
+
+Push and pull 315
+% \indexspace
+
+Radiometer 154
+
+Reflection 147
+
+Retina, its functions 171
+
+Reflex action 172
+
+Refraction 138, 147
+
+Resistance, electrical 192, 214
+
+Rotations in ether 235
+% \indexspace
+
+Satellite 69
+
+Saturn, temperature of 144
+
+Science, no one independent 378
+
+Senses 161, 371
+
+Séances, phenomena at 362, 379
+
+Seeing, what is implied in 369
+
+Sirius 145
+
+Silver salts unstable 159
+
+Soap-bubbles 10
+
+Sound, origin of 257, 360
+
+Sound, characteristics 262
+
+Sound, range of 263
+
+Sound, velocity of 263
+
+Sound, vocal 272
+
+Solar system 329
+
+Space 58
+
+Space, navigation of 154
+
+Specialists 373
+
+Spiritualistic theory 360
+
+Specific gravity 7
+
+Specific heat 130
+
+Spectroscope 139
+
+Spectrum analysis 140
+%\DPPageSep{422.png}{407}%
+
+Spectrum, solar 138, 142
+
+Spark, electric 223
+
+Spirit disembodied 360
+
+Stress in ether 93
+
+Stress in glass 92
+
+Stress, electrical 183, 197, 231
+
+Stress, magnetic 181
+
+Steam-engine 113
+
+Steam-engine, efficiency of 114
+
+Stars, their number 18
+
+Stars, their distance 19, 28
+
+Stars, their motions 145
+
+Sun, its distance 28, 56
+
+Sun, its magnitude 122
+
+Sun, its heat 122
+
+Sun, its age 122
+
+Sun, its structure 143
+% \indexspace
+
+Temperature 106
+
+Temperature, table 108
+
+Temperature, maximum 127
+
+Terminology, electrical 186
+
+Telegraph 211
+
+Telephone 211
+
+Thermometer 107
+
+Tesla ether waves 344
+
+Thermometer, air 109
+
+Thomson, Sir Wm. 35
+
+Thermodynamics 112
+
+Thermopile 176
+
+Thermodynamics, electric 174
+
+Thought transference 395, 311
+
+Toepler-Holtz electrical machine 294
+
+Top, sleep of 72
+
+Transparency 146
+
+Transformations of motion 321
+% \indexspace
+
+Universe, its size 28
+
+Universe, atoms in 20
+% \indexspace
+
+Vacuum, a non-conductor 223
+
+Vacuum 47
+
+Venus 55
+
+Velocities 50, 54, 56
+
+Vibrations per second 52, 53
+
+Vibrations, gaseous 116
+
+Vibrations, sympathetic 249, 267
+
+Vibrations, forced 267
+
+Vital force 279 % Appendix.
+
+Vital force@{Appendix.}
+
+Vision, phenomena of 164
+
+Vision, hallucinations of 166
+
+Vision, energy needed for 166
+
+Vision of animals 168
+
+Vision, theory of 168
+
+Voice 272
+
+Vortex ring theory of matter 94
+
+Vortex ring model 342
+
+Vortex rings in air 35
+
+Vortex rings, properties of 37, 72
+
+Volcanoes 127
+% \indexspace
+
+Wave lengths of sound 265
+
+Waves, electric 303
+
+Water decomposition 218
+
+Weight 61
+
+Weights, standards of 60
+
+Welding, electric 210
+
+Work, standard of 60
+
+Work, measure of 62, 64, 318
+
+Work, muscular 67
+\fi
+
+\cleardoublepage
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{Catalog}{Catalog}
+
+%\DPPageSep{423.png}{I}%
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.5pt}
+\fancyhead[C]{\textit{Books Upon Various Subjects}}
+\thispagestyle{empty}
+
+\begin{center}
+\textsf{\Large LEE AND SHEPARD}\\[12pt]
+\textsf{\large 10~MILK STREET BOSTON}\\[8pt]
+\tb\\[12pt]
+{\Large List of Books upon Various Subjects}\\[8pt]
+\tb
+\end{center}
+
+\Entry{QUABBIN}
+
+\Subentry
+Sketches in a Small Town \quad With Outlooks upon Puritan Life \quad By \Au{Francis~H.
+Underwood}~LL.D. author of ``Handbooks of English Literature''
+``Man Proposes'' ``Lord of Himself'' etc. Fully illustrated
+Cloth \$1.75
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+This work purports to give an account of the progress of a small New England town;
+but it is of wider and deeper import; namely, a view of the development of the narrow
+and sombre Puritan into the variously gifted and accomplished ``Yankee'' of to-day. It
+concerns the state of literature and art in the early part of the present century, and shows
+how the fairer conditions of modern times came into being.
+
+In plan it is wholly unlike any modern book. It is not a town history, nor an historical
+essay, nor a collection of reminiscences. Its chapters are mostly picturesque descriptions
+of the old times, and show the ``rude forefathers'' at home, at church, at town-meetings, at
+road-making, and in other scenes of their daily life. There are sketches of the successive
+ministers, the schools, the quiltings, sleigh-rides, and other rustic gatherings,---of the
+homely speech and manners, and of the complexities of Yankee character.
+
+It is believed that these graphic, tender, and humorous pictures will appeal to the hearts
+and memories of New England people, and to their descendants along the line of migration
+westward to the Mississippi and beyond.
+
+The illustrations are from photographs taken from beautiful scenes in ``Quabbin.''
+\end{Descrip}
+
+\clearpage
+\Entry{UNIVERSAL PHONOGRAPHY or Short-hand by the ``Allen
+Method''}
+
+\Subentry
+A self-instructor, whereby more speed than long-hand writing is gained at
+the first lesson, and additional speed at each subsequent lesson \quad By \Au{G.~G.
+Allen}, Principal of the Allen Stenographic Institute Boston \quad 50~cents
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+There is scarcely any requirement so helpful to the student, scholar, scientist, or professional
+man as short-hand writing. Heretofore all methods have required so long a
+time before one could become so proficient as to make it of any advantage, that men in
+middle life, or busy men, have not been able to give the time to learn it; but by the ``Allen
+Method'' one can almost in ``the idle moments of a busy life,'' certainly in an hour a day
+for two or three months, become so expert as to report a lecture \textit{verbatim}.
+\end{Descrip}
+%\DPPageSep{424.png}{II}%
+%Font size changes on this page
+\Entry{MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION}
+
+\Subentry
+The Factors and Relations of Physical Science \quad By \Au{Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear}
+Tufts College author of ``The Telephone'' ``The Art of Projecting''
+etc. \quad Cloth~\$2.00
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+``Matter, Ether, and Motion,'' the Factors and Relations of Physical Science, by A.~E.
+Dolbear,~Ph.D\@. The author in this treatise presents to his readers the principles of physical
+science. The chapters are arranged as Matter, Ether, Motion, Energy, Gravitation,
+Heat, Ether Waves, Electricity, Chemism, Sound, Life, Physical Fields, Machines and
+Mechanism. This is a tolerably comprehensive table, and introduces the student to the
+principles on which, so far as at present known, the action of the universe seems to
+depend.
+
+Altogether this little treatise gives an insight into matters outside the common range of
+serious study, and yet places the subject within reach of the student seeking for knowledge.
+Although dealing with abstruse scientific topics, the style is lucid, and the matter intelligible
+to ordinary thinkers and readers in search of information.---\textit{New York Commercial
+Advertiser}.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+\Entry{THE TELEPHONE}
+
+\Subentry
+An account of the phenomena of electricity, magnetism, and sound as involved
+in its action; with directions for making a speaking telephone \quad
+By \Au{Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear} of Tufts College \quad 50~cents
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+An interesting little book upon this most fascinating subject, which is treated in a very
+clear and methodical way. First we have a thorough review of the discoveries in electricity,
+then of magnetism, then of those in the study of sound,---pitch, velocity, timbre, tone,
+resonance, sympathetic vibrations, etc. From these the telephone is reached, and by them
+in a measure explained.---\textit{Hartford Courant}.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+\Entry{THE ART OF PROJECTING}
+
+\Subentry
+By \textsc{Prof.\ A.~E. Dolbear}~Ph.D. (Tufts College) \quad New Edition revised
+with additions \quad $125$~illustrations \quad Cloth~\$2.00
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+A Manual of Experimentation in Physics, Chemistry, and Natural History with the Porte
+Lumière and the Magic Lantern; also with Electric Lights and Lamps and the Production
+and Phenomena of Vortex Rings.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+\Entry{WHAT IS TO BE DONE--(Emergency Handbook)}
+
+\Subentry
+A Handbook for the Nursery with Useful Hints for Children and Adults \quad
+By \Au{Robert~B. Dixon}~M.D. Surgeon of the Fifth Massachusetts Infantry,
+Physician to the Boston Dispensary \quad Cloth 50~cents; paper 30~cents
+
+\begin{Descrip}
+Dr.\ Dixon, in this little ``Emergency Handbook,'' gives simple directions what to do
+in a number of the most common cases that arise, either in home treatment of slight accidents,
+or indispositions, or in the case of patients in more serious cases, until the arrival of
+the physician. The book is worth its weight in gold, and ought to have a place in every
+family library.---\textit{Providence Press}.
+\end{Descrip}
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% GUTENBERG LICENSE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\clearpage
+\fancyhf{}
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
+\cleardoublepage
+
+\backmatter
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[-1]{Back Matter}{Back Matter}
+\phantomsection
+\pdfbookmark[0]{PG License}{Project Gutenberg License}
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.5pt}
+\fancyhead[C]{\textsc{LICENSING}}
+
+\begin{PGtext}
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed.,
+enl., by Amos Emerson Dolbear
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION ***
+
+***** This file should be named 31428-pdf.pdf or 31428-pdf.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/1/4/2/31428/
+
+Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+\end{PGtext}
+
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+% %
+% End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev. ed.,
+% enl., by Amos Emerson Dolbear %
+% %
+% *** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MATTER, ETHER, AND MOTION *** %
+% %
+% ***** This file should be named 31428-t.tex or 31428-t.zip ***** %
+% This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: %
+% http://www.gutenberg.org/3/1/4/2/31428/ %
+% %
+% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %
+
+\end{document}
+
+###
+@ControlwordReplace = (
+ ['\\Example', 'Example']
+ );
+
+@MathEnvironments = (
+ ['\\begin{DPalign*}','\\end{DPalign*}','<DPALIGN>'],
+ ['\\begin{DPgather*}','\\end{DPgather*}','<DPGATHER>']
+ );
+
+@ControlwordArguments = (
+ ['\\hyperref', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Chapter', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, 'Chapter ', '. ', 1, 1, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Chapref', 1, 1, '', '', 1, 1, ' ', ''],
+ ['\\Eqref', 0, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', '', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 1, ' ', ''],
+ ['\\Pageref', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\Pagelabel', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Figlabel', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\tb', 0, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\Graphic', 1, 0, '', '<ILLUSTRATION>', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\SetRunningHeads', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\AppendixCite', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\AppendixCitePage', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ' ', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPtypo', 1, 0, '', '', 1, 1, '', ''],
+ ['\\DPnote', 1, 0, '', ''],
+ ['\\First', 1, 1, '', '']
+ );
+###
+This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) (format=pdflatex 2009.12.9) 27 FEB 2010 10:00
+entering extended mode
+ %&-line parsing enabled.
+**31428-t.tex
+(./31428-t.tex
+LaTeX2e <2005/12/01>
+Babel <v3.8h> and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumylang, noh
+yphenation, arabic, farsi, croatian, ukrainian, russian, bulgarian, czech, slov
+ak, danish, dutch, finnish, basque, french, german, ngerman, ibycus, greek, mon
+ogreek, ancientgreek, hungarian, italian, latin, mongolian, norsk, icelandic, i
+nterlingua, turkish, coptic, romanian, welsh, serbian, slovenian, estonian, esp
+eranto, uppersorbian, indonesian, polish, portuguese, spanish, catalan, galicia
+n, swedish, ukenglish, pinyin, loaded.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/book.cls
+Document Class: book 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/bk12.clo
+File: bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+)
+\c@part=\count79
+\c@chapter=\count80
+\c@section=\count81
+\c@subsection=\count82
+\c@subsubsection=\count83
+\c@paragraph=\count84
+\c@subparagraph=\count85
+\c@figure=\count86
+\c@table=\count87
+\abovecaptionskip=\skip41
+\belowcaptionskip=\skip42
+\bibindent=\dimen102
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty
+Package: inputenc 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+\inpenc@prehook=\toks14
+\inpenc@posthook=\toks15
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/latin1.def
+File: latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty
+Package: ifthen 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsmath.sty
+Package: amsmath 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+\@mathmargin=\skip43
+For additional information on amsmath, use the `?' option.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amstext.sty
+Package: amstext 2000/06/29 v2.01
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsgen.sty
+File: amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+\@emptytoks=\toks16
+\ex@=\dimen103
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsbsy.sty
+Package: amsbsy 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+\pmbraise@=\dimen104
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsmath/amsopn.sty
+Package: amsopn 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+)
+\inf@bad=\count88
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \frac on input line 211.
+\uproot@=\count89
+\leftroot@=\count90
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \overline on input line 307.
+\classnum@=\count91
+\DOTSCASE@=\count92
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ldots on input line 379.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \dots on input line 382.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \cdots on input line 467.
+\Mathstrutbox@=\box26
+\strutbox@=\box27
+\big@size=\dimen105
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OML on input line 567.
+LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OMS on input line 568.
+\macc@depth=\count93
+\c@MaxMatrixCols=\count94
+\dotsspace@=\muskip10
+\c@parentequation=\count95
+\dspbrk@lvl=\count96
+\tag@help=\toks17
+\row@=\count97
+\column@=\count98
+\maxfields@=\count99
+\andhelp@=\toks18
+\eqnshift@=\dimen106
+\alignsep@=\dimen107
+\tagshift@=\dimen108
+\tagwidth@=\dimen109
+\totwidth@=\dimen110
+\lineht@=\dimen111
+\@envbody=\toks19
+\multlinegap=\skip44
+\multlinetaggap=\skip45
+\mathdisplay@stack=\toks20
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \[ on input line 2666.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \] on input line 2667.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amssymb.sty
+Package: amssymb 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/amsfonts/amsfonts.sty
+Package: amsfonts 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+\symAMSa=\mathgroup4
+\symAMSb=\mathgroup5
+LaTeX Font Info: Overwriting math alphabet `\mathfrak' in version `bold'
+(Font) U/euf/m/n --> U/euf/b/n on input line 132.
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/alltt.sty
+Package: alltt 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/array.sty
+Package: array 2005/08/23 v2.4b Tabular extension package (FMi)
+\col@sep=\dimen112
+\extrarowheight=\dimen113
+\NC@list=\toks21
+\extratabsurround=\skip46
+\backup@length=\skip47
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/mathpazo.sty
+Package: mathpazo 2005/04/12 PSNFSS-v9.2a Palatino w/ Pazo Math (D.Puga, WaS)
+\symupright=\mathgroup6
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/yfonts/yfonts.sty
+Package: yfonts 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/bigfoot/perpage.sty
+Package: perpage 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+\c@abspage=\count100
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/multicol.sty
+Package: multicol 2006/05/18 v1.6g multicolumn formatting (FMi)
+\c@tracingmulticols=\count101
+\mult@box=\box28
+\multicol@leftmargin=\dimen114
+\c@unbalance=\count102
+\c@collectmore=\count103
+\doublecol@number=\count104
+\multicoltolerance=\count105
+\multicolpretolerance=\count106
+\full@width=\dimen115
+\page@free=\dimen116
+\premulticols=\dimen117
+\postmulticols=\dimen118
+\multicolsep=\skip48
+\multicolbaselineskip=\skip49
+\partial@page=\box29
+\last@line=\box30
+\mult@rightbox=\box31
+\mult@grightbox=\box32
+\mult@gfirstbox=\box33
+\mult@firstbox=\box34
+\@tempa=\box35
+\@tempa=\box36
+\@tempa=\box37
+\@tempa=\box38
+\@tempa=\box39
+\@tempa=\box40
+\@tempa=\box41
+\@tempa=\box42
+\@tempa=\box43
+\@tempa=\box44
+\@tempa=\box45
+\@tempa=\box46
+\@tempa=\box47
+\@tempa=\box48
+\@tempa=\box49
+\@tempa=\box50
+\@tempa=\box51
+\c@columnbadness=\count107
+\c@finalcolumnbadness=\count108
+\last@try=\dimen119
+\multicolovershoot=\dimen120
+\multicolundershoot=\dimen121
+\mult@nat@firstbox=\box52
+\colbreak@box=\box53
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/makeidx.sty
+Package: makeidx 2000/03/29 v1.0m Standard LaTeX package
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
+Package: caption 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/caption/caption3.sty
+Package: caption3 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty
+Package: keyval 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+\KV@toks@=\toks22
+)
+\captionmargin=\dimen122
+\captionmarginx=\dimen123
+\captionwidth=\dimen124
+\captionindent=\dimen125
+\captionparindent=\dimen126
+\captionhangindent=\dimen127
+)) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphicx.sty
+Package: graphicx 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/graphics.sty
+Package: graphics 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/trig.sty
+Package: trig 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/graphics.cfg
+File: graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package graphics Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 90.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/pdftex-def/pdftex.def
+File: pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+\Gread@gobject=\count109
+))
+\Gin@req@height=\dimen128
+\Gin@req@width=\dimen129
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/wrapfig/wrapfig.sty
+\wrapoverhang=\dimen130
+\WF@size=\dimen131
+\c@WF@wrappedlines=\count110
+\WF@box=\box54
+\WF@everypar=\toks23
+Package: wrapfig 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/textcomp.sty
+Package: textcomp 2005/09/27 v1.99g Standard LaTeX package
+Package textcomp Info: Sub-encoding information:
+(textcomp) 5 = only ISO-Adobe without \textcurrency
+(textcomp) 4 = 5 + \texteuro
+(textcomp) 3 = 4 + \textohm
+(textcomp) 2 = 3 + \textestimated + \textcurrency
+(textcomp) 1 = TS1 - \textcircled - \t
+(textcomp) 0 = TS1 (full)
+(textcomp) Font families with sub-encoding setting implement
+(textcomp) only a restricted character set as indicated.
+(textcomp) Family '?' is the default used for unknown fonts.
+(textcomp) See the documentation for details.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ? sub-encoding to TS1/1 on input line 71.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ts1enc.def
+File: ts1enc.def 2001/06/05 v3.0e (jk/car/fm) Standard LaTeX file
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \oldstylenums on input line 266.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 281.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmss sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 282.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 283.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmvtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 284.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmbr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 285.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting cmtl sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 286.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ccr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 287.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ptm sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 288.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pcr sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 289.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting phv sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 290.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ppl sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 291.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pag sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 292.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pbk sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 293.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pnc sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 294.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pzc sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 295.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting bch sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 296.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting put sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 297.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting uag sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 298.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ugq sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 299.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ul8 sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 300.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ul9 sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 301.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting augie sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 302.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting dayrom sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 303.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting dayroms sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 304.
+
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pxr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 305.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pxss sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 306.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pxtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 307.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting txr sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 308.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting txss sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 309.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting txtt sub-encoding to TS1/0 on input line 310.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting futs sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 311.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting futx sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 312.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting futj sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 313.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlh sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 314.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hls sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 315.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlst sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 316.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlct sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 317.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlx sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 318.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlce sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 319.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlcn sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 320.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlcw sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 321.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting hlcf sub-encoding to TS1/5 on input line 322.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pplx sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 323.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting pplj sub-encoding to TS1/3 on input line 324.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ptmx sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 325.
+Package textcomp Info: Setting ptmj sub-encoding to TS1/4 on input line 326.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/indentfirst.sty
+Package: indentfirst 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/textcase/textcase.sty
+Package: textcase 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/calc.sty
+Package: calc 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+\calc@Acount=\count111
+\calc@Bcount=\count112
+\calc@Adimen=\dimen132
+\calc@Bdimen=\dimen133
+\calc@Askip=\skip50
+\calc@Bskip=\skip51
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \setlength on input line 75.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \addtolength on input line 76.
+\calc@Ccount=\count113
+\calc@Cskip=\skip52
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/fancyhdr/fancyhdr.sty
+\fancy@headwidth=\skip53
+\f@ncyO@elh=\skip54
+\f@ncyO@erh=\skip55
+\f@ncyO@olh=\skip56
+\f@ncyO@orh=\skip57
+\f@ncyO@elf=\skip58
+\f@ncyO@erf=\skip59
+\f@ncyO@olf=\skip60
+\f@ncyO@orf=\skip61
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/geometry/geometry.sty
+Package: geometry 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+\Gm@cnth=\count114
+\Gm@cntv=\count115
+\c@Gm@tempcnt=\count116
+\Gm@bindingoffset=\dimen134
+\Gm@wd@mp=\dimen135
+\Gm@odd@mp=\dimen136
+\Gm@even@mp=\dimen137
+\Gm@dimlist=\toks24
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/xelatex/xetexconfig/geometry.cfg)) (/usr/share/te
+xmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty
+Package: hyperref 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+\@linkdim=\dimen138
+\Hy@linkcounter=\count117
+\Hy@pagecounter=\count118
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/pd1enc.def
+File: pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+) (/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/hyperref.cfg
+File: hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/kvoptions.sty
+Package: kvoptions 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (
+HO)
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Option `hyperfootnotes' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `linktocpage' set `false' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfdisplaydoctitle' set `true' on input line 223
+8.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `pdfpagelabels' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `bookmarksopen' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Option `colorlinks' set `true' on input line 2238.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 2288.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 2293.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 2296.
+Package hyperref Info: Plain pages OFF on input line 2303.
+Package hyperref Info: Backreferencing OFF on input line 2308.
+Implicit mode ON; LaTeX internals redefined
+Package hyperref Info: Bookmarks ON on input line 2444.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ltxmisc/url.sty
+\Urlmuskip=\muskip11
+Package: url 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \url on input line 2599.
+\Fld@menulength=\count119
+\Field@Width=\dimen139
+\Fld@charsize=\dimen140
+\Choice@toks=\toks25
+\Field@toks=\toks26
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 3102.
+Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 3107.
+Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 3110.
+Package hyperref Info: backreferencing OFF on input line 3117.
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 3120.
+\Hy@abspage=\count120
+\c@Item=\count121
+)
+*hyperref using driver hpdftex*
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hpdftex.def
+File: hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+\Fld@listcount=\count122
+)
+\c@pp@a@footnote=\count123
+\TmpLen=\skip62
+\QUAD=\skip63
+\@indexfile=\write3
+\openout3 = `31428-t.idx'.
+
+Writing index file 31428-t.idx
+(./31428-t.aux)
+\openout1 = `31428-t.aux'.
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LY/yfrak/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for LYG/ygoth/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for TS1/cmr/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for TS1+cmr on input line 560.
+
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/ts1cmr.fd
+File: ts1cmr.fd 1999/05/25 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for PD1/pdf/m/n on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 560.
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OT1+pplj on input line 560
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ot1pplj.fd
+File: ot1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for OT1/pplj.
+) (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ragged2e/ragged2e.sty
+Package: ragged2e 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/everysel/everysel.sty
+Package: everysel 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \selectfont on input line 125.
+)
+\CenteringLeftskip=\skip64
+\RaggedLeftLeftskip=\skip65
+\RaggedRightLeftskip=\skip66
+\CenteringRightskip=\skip67
+\RaggedLeftRightskip=\skip68
+\RaggedRightRightskip=\skip69
+\CenteringParfillskip=\skip70
+\RaggedLeftParfillskip=\skip71
+\RaggedRightParfillskip=\skip72
+\JustifyingParfillskip=\skip73
+\CenteringParindent=\skip74
+\RaggedLeftParindent=\skip75
+\RaggedRightParindent=\skip76
+\JustifyingParindent=\skip77
+)
+Package caption Info: hyperref package v6.74m (or newer) detected on input line
+ 560.
+(/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/supp-pdf.tex
+[Loading MPS to PDF converter (version 2006.09.02).]
+\scratchcounter=\count124
+\scratchdimen=\dimen141
+\scratchbox=\box55
+\nofMPsegments=\count125
+\nofMParguments=\count126
+\everyMPshowfont=\toks27
+\MPscratchCnt=\count127
+\MPscratchDim=\dimen142
+\MPnumerator=\count128
+\everyMPtoPDFconversion=\toks28
+)
+-------------------- Geometry parameters
+paper: class default
+landscape: --
+twocolumn: --
+twoside: true
+asymmetric: --
+h-parts: 9.03375pt, 307.14749pt, 9.03375pt
+v-parts: 37.58047pt, 411.93877pt, 56.37076pt
+hmarginratio: 1:1
+vmarginratio: 2:3
+lines: --
+heightrounded: --
+bindingoffset: 0.0pt
+truedimen: --
+includehead: --
+includefoot: --
+includemp: --
+driver: pdftex
+-------------------- Page layout dimensions and switches
+\paperwidth 325.215pt
+\paperheight 505.89pt
+\textwidth 307.14749pt
+\textheight 411.93877pt
+\oddsidemargin -63.23624pt
+\evensidemargin -63.23624pt
+\topmargin -66.56331pt
+\headheight 15.0pt
+\headsep 19.8738pt
+\footskip 30.0pt
+\marginparwidth 27.10124pt
+\marginparsep 8.0pt
+\columnsep 10.0pt
+\skip\footins 10.8pt plus 4.0pt minus 2.0pt
+\hoffset 0.0pt
+\voffset 0.0pt
+\mag 1000
+\@twosidetrue \@mparswitchtrue
+(1in=72.27pt, 1cm=28.45pt)
+-----------------------
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/color.sty
+Package: color 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+(/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/color.cfg
+File: color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+)
+Package color Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 130.
+)
+Package hyperref Info: Link coloring ON on input line 560.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty
+Package: nameref 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/oberdiek/refcount.sty
+Package: refcount 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+)
+\c@section@level=\count129
+)
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \ref on input line 560.
+LaTeX Info: Redefining \pageref on input line 560.
+(./31428-t.out) (./31428-t.out)
+\@outlinefile=\write4
+\openout4 = `31428-t.out'.
+
+
+Overfull \hbox (15.85715pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 577--577
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Motion, Rev
+. ed., enl., by[]
+ []
+
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OT1+ppl on input line 599.
+
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ot1ppl.fd
+File: ot1ppl.fd 2001/06/04 font definitions for OT1/ppl.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OML+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/omlzplm.fd
+File: omlzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OML/zplm.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OMS+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/omszplm.fd
+File: omszplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMS/zplm.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OMX+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/omxzplm.fd
+File: omxzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMX/zplm.
+)
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.46208pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 9.37807pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 8.33606pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.46208pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 9.37807pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 8.33606pt on input line 599.
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for OT1+zplm on input line 599
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ot1zplm.fd
+File: ot1zplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OT1/zplm.
+) [1
+
+{/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <14.4> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 622.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.40997pt on input line 625.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 6.25204pt on input line 625.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 11.40997pt on input line 625.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 6.25204pt on input line 625.
+[2
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for TS1+pplj on input line 682
+.
+(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/psnfss/ts1pplj.fd
+File: ts1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for TS1/pplj.
+) [3
+
+] [1
+
+] [2
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <17.28> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 740.
+[3
+
+
+
+] [4] [5] [6
+
+
+] [7] [8] [9]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <24.88> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 926.
+(./31428-t.toc
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 10.42007pt on input line 4.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 7.91925pt on input line 4.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 10.42007pt on input line 4.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 7.91925pt on input line 4.
+)
+\tf@toc=\write5
+\openout5 = `31428-t.toc'.
+
+[10
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <12> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 985.
+[1
+
+
+] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
+Overfull \hbox (0.19246pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 1211--1217
+ []
+ []
+
+[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]
+[25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30
+
+] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] <./images/048a.png, id=382,
+ 361.35pt x 254.9525pt>
+File: ./images/048a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/048a.png> [41] [42 <./images/048a.png>] <./images/049a.png, id=39
+5, 216.81pt x 273.02pt>
+File: ./images/049a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/049a.png> [43 <./images/049a.png>] [44] [45] [46] <./images/052a.
+png, id=416, 438.63875pt x 746.79pt>
+File: ./images/052a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/052a.png> [47 <./images/052a.png (PNG copy)>] [48] [49] [50] [51]
+[52
+
+] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [6
+8] [69] [70
+
+] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [8
+6] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99
+
+] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112]
+[113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118
+
+] [119] <./images/113a.png, id=740, 1039.885pt x 572.1375pt>
+File: ./images/113a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/113a.png> <./images/114a.png, id=741, 82.3075pt x 638.385pt>
+File: ./images/114a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/114a.png> [120] [121 <./images/113a.png (PNG copy)> <./images/114
+a.png>] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] <./images/121a.png, id=789, 8
+0.3pt x 544.0325pt>
+File: ./images/121a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/121a.png> [129] [130 <./images/121a.png (PNG copy)>] [131] [132]
+[133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] <./images/129a.png, id=837, 317.185pt x 299
+.1175pt>
+File: ./images/129a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/129a.png> [139] [140 <./images/129a.png (PNG copy)>] [141] [142]
+[143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [
+156] [157] [158] [159] [160
+
+] [161] [162] [163] <./images/150a.png, id=955, 1080.035pt x 156.585pt>
+File: ./images/150a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/150a.png> [164] [165 <./images/150a.png>] <./images/151a.png, id=
+967, 1138.2525pt x 616.3025pt>
+File: ./images/151a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/151a.png> [166] [167 <./images/151a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/15
+4a.png, id=978, 1086.0575pt x 152.57pt>
+File: ./images/154a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/154a.png> [168] [169] [170 <./images/154a.png>] [171] [172] [173]
+[174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] <./images/167a.png,
+ id=1051, 383.4325pt x 931.48pt>
+File: ./images/167a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/167a.png> [184] [185 <./images/167a.png (PNG copy)>] [186] [187]
+[188] [189] <./images/171a.png, id=1081, 1009.7725pt x 231.86626pt>
+File: ./images/171a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/171a.png> [190 <./images/171a.png>] [191] [192] [193] <./images/1
+74a.png, id=1103, 1060.96375pt x 290.08376pt>
+File: ./images/174a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/174a.png> <./images/175a.png, id=1104, 662.475pt x 746.79pt>
+File: ./images/175a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/175a.png> [194 <./images/174a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/175b.png
+, id=1111, 999.735pt x 572.1375pt>
+File: ./images/175b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/175b.png> [195 <./images/175a.png (PNG copy)>] [196 <./images/175
+b.png (PNG copy)>] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206]
+[207
+
+] <./images/188a.png, id=1172, 628.3475pt x 796.9775pt>
+File: ./images/188a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/188a.png> [208] [209] [210] [211 <./images/188a.png (PNG copy)>]
+<./images/190a.png, id=1194, 202.7575pt x 292.09125pt>
+File: ./images/190a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/190a.png> [212] [213 <./images/190a.png>] [214] <./images/192a.pn
+g, id=1211, 1142.2675pt x 803.0pt>
+File: ./images/192a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/192a.png> [215] [216 <./images/192a.png (PNG copy)>] [217] [218]
+[219] [220] [221] [222] [223] [224] [225] [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [
+232] [233] [234] [235] [236] [237] [238] [239] [240] <./images/213a.png, id=133
+2, 847.165pt x 578.16pt>
+File: ./images/213a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/213a.png> [241 <./images/213a.png>] [242] <./images/216a.png, id=
+1344, 397.485pt x 472.76625pt>
+File: ./images/216a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/216a.png> <./images/216b.png, id=1345, 403.5075pt x 238.8925pt>
+File: ./images/216b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/216b.png> <./images/216c.png, id=1346, 287.0725pt x 281.05pt>
+File: ./images/216c.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/216c.png> [243] [244] [245 <./images/216a.png (PNG copy)> <./imag
+es/216b.png (PNG copy)> <./images/216c.png (PNG copy)>] [246] <./images/218a.pn
+g, id=1372, 442.65375pt x 228.855pt>
+File: ./images/218a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/218a.png> [247 <./images/218a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/218b.png
+, id=1379, 236.885pt x 104.39pt>
+File: ./images/218b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/218b.png> [248 <./images/218b.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/220a.png
+, id=1386, 479.7925pt x 214.8025pt>
+File: ./images/220a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/220a.png> [249] [250 <./images/220a.png (PNG copy)>] [251] [252]
+[253] [254] [255] [256] [257] [258] [259] [260] [261] [262] [263] [264] [265] [
+266] [267] <./images/236a.png, id=1475, 837.1275pt x 961.5925pt>
+File: ./images/236a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/236a.png> [268] <./images/237a.png, id=1480, 889.3225pt x 586.19p
+t>
+File: ./images/237a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/237a.png> [269] [270 <./images/236a.png (PNG copy)>] [271 <./imag
+es/237a.png (PNG copy)>] [272] [273] [274] [275] [276] [277] [278] [279] [280]
+[281] [282] [283] [284] [285] [286
+
+] [287] [288] [289] [290] [291] [292] <./images/256a.png, id=1590, 320.19624pt
+x 316.18124pt>
+File: ./images/256a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/256a.png> [293 <./images/256a.png (PNG copy)>] <./images/258a.png
+, id=1597, 437.635pt x 451.6875pt>
+File: ./images/258a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/258a.png> <./images/257a.png, id=1598, 772.8875pt x 1023.825pt>
+File: ./images/257a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/257a.png> <./images/258b.png, id=1599, 283.0575pt x 250.9375pt>
+File: ./images/258b.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/258b.png> <./images/258c.png, id=1600, 374.39874pt x 355.3275pt>
+File: ./images/258c.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/258c.png> [294 <./images/258a.png>] [295 <./images/257a.png>] [29
+6 <./images/258b.png> <./images/258c.png>] <./images/260a.png, id=1625, 1027.84
+pt x 995.72pt>
+File: ./images/260a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/260a.png>
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msa/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 5.21004pt on input line 9558.
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `U/msb/m/n' will be
+(Font) scaled to size 5.21004pt on input line 9558.
+[297] [298] [299 <./images/260a.png (PNG copy)>] [300] [301] [302] [303] [304]
+[305] [306] [307] [308] [309] [310
+
+] [311] [312] [313] [314] [315] [316] <./images/277a.png, id=1713, 270.00874pt
+x 150.5625pt>
+File: ./images/277a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/277a.png> [317] [318 <./images/277a.png>] [319] [320] [321] [322]
+[323] [324] [325] [326] [327] [328] [329] [330] [331] <./images/289a.png, id=17
+81, 851.18pt x 588.1975pt>
+File: ./images/289a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/289a.png> [332] [333 <./images/289a.png (PNG copy)>] [334] [335]
+[336
+
+] [337] [338] [339] [340] [341] <./images/297a.png, id=1829, 1092.08pt x 1074.0
+125pt>
+File: ./images/297a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/297a.png> [342] [343] [344 <./images/297a.png (PNG copy)>] [345]
+[346] [347] [348] [349] [350] [351] [352] [353] [354] [355] [356] [357] [358] [
+359] [360] [361] [362
+
+] [363] [364] [365] [366] [367] [368] [369] [370] [371] [372] [373] [374] [375]
+[376] [377] [378] [379
+
+] [380] [381] [382] [383] [384] [385] [386] [387] [388] [389] [390] [391] [392]
+[393] [394] [395] [396] [397] <./images/343a.png, id=2074, 634.37pt x 489.83pt>
+File: ./images/343a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/343a.png> [398 <./images/343a.png (PNG copy)>] [399] [400] [401
+
+] [402] [403] [404] [405] [406] [407] [408] [409] [410] [411] [412] <./images/3
+57a.png, id=2146, 431.6125pt x 772.8875pt>
+File: ./images/357a.png Graphic file (type png)
+<use ./images/357a.png> [413] [414 <./images/357a.png (PNG copy)>] [415] [416]
+[417] [418] [419] [420] [421] [422] [423] [424] [425] [426] [427] [428
+
+] [429] [430] [431] [432] [433] [434] [435] [436] [437] [438] [439] [440] [441]
+[442] [443] [444] [445] [446] [447] [448] [449] [450] [451] [452] [453] [454] [
+455] [456] [457] [458] [459] [460] [461] [462] [463
+
+] [464] [465] [466] [467] [468] [469] [470] [471] [472] [473] [474] [475] [476]
+[477
+
+] [478] [479] [480] [481] [482] [483] [484] (./31428-t.ind [485
+
+
+] [486] [487] [488] [489] [490] [491])
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <10.95> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 15593
+.
+[492
+
+
+
+]
+LaTeX Font Info: Font shape `OT1/pplj/bx/n' in size <10> not available
+(Font) Font shape `OT1/pplj/b/n' tried instead on input line 15624
+.
+[493
+
+] [494]
+Overfull \hbox (7.35703pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15726--15726
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Matter, Ether, and Moti
+on, Rev. ed.,[]
+ []
+
+[495
+
+
+
+] [496]
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15799--15799
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
+ Foundation"[]
+ []
+
+
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15804--15804
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prev
+ent you from[]
+ []
+
+
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15809--15809
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with
+the terms of[]
+ []
+
+[497] [498]
+Overfull \hbox (3.10696pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 15872--15872
+[]\OT1/cmtt/m/n/8 posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gut
+enberg.org),[]
+ []
+
+[499] [500] [501] [502] [503] [504] [505] (./31428-t.aux)
+
+ *File List*
+ book.cls 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
+ bk12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
+inputenc.sty 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ latin1.def 2006/05/05 v1.1b Input encoding file
+ ifthen.sty 2001/05/26 v1.1c Standard LaTeX ifthen package (DPC)
+ amsmath.sty 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
+ amstext.sty 2000/06/29 v2.01
+ amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
+ amsbsy.sty 1999/11/29 v1.2d
+ amsopn.sty 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
+ amssymb.sty 2002/01/22 v2.2d
+amsfonts.sty 2001/10/25 v2.2f
+ alltt.sty 1997/06/16 v2.0g defines alltt environment
+ array.sty 2005/08/23 v2.4b Tabular extension package (FMi)
+mathpazo.sty 2005/04/12 PSNFSS-v9.2a Palatino w/ Pazo Math (D.Puga, WaS)
+ yfonts.sty 2003/01/08 v1.3 (WaS)
+ perpage.sty 2006/07/15 1.12 Reset/sort counters per page
+multicol.sty 2006/05/18 v1.6g multicolumn formatting (FMi)
+ makeidx.sty 2000/03/29 v1.0m Standard LaTeX package
+ caption.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k Customising captions (AR)
+caption3.sty 2007/01/07 v3.0k caption3 kernel (AR)
+ keyval.sty 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
+graphicx.sty 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+graphics.sty 2006/02/20 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
+ trig.sty 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
+graphics.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 graphics configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ pdftex.def 2007/01/08 v0.04d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
+ wrapfig.sty 2003/01/31 v 3.6
+textcomp.sty 2005/09/27 v1.99g Standard LaTeX package
+ ts1enc.def 2001/06/05 v3.0e (jk/car/fm) Standard LaTeX file
+indentfirst.sty 1995/11/23 v1.03 Indent first paragraph (DPC)
+textcase.sty 2004/10/07 v0.07 Text only upper/lower case changing (DPC)
+ calc.sty 2005/08/06 v4.2 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)
+fancyhdr.sty
+geometry.sty 2002/07/08 v3.2 Page Geometry
+geometry.cfg
+hyperref.sty 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hypertext links for LaTeX
+ pd1enc.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
+hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
+kvoptions.sty 2006/08/22 v2.4 Connects package keyval with LaTeX options (HO
+)
+ url.sty 2005/06/27 ver 3.2 Verb mode for urls, etc.
+ hpdftex.def 2007/02/07 v6.75r Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
+ ts1cmr.fd 1999/05/25 v2.5h Standard LaTeX font definitions
+ ot1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for OT1/pplj.
+ragged2e.sty 2003/03/25 v2.04 ragged2e Package (MS)
+everysel.sty 1999/06/08 v1.03 EverySelectfont Package (MS)
+supp-pdf.tex
+ color.sty 2005/11/14 v1.0j Standard LaTeX Color (DPC)
+ color.cfg 2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
+ nameref.sty 2006/12/27 v2.28 Cross-referencing by name of section
+refcount.sty 2006/02/20 v3.0 Data extraction from references (HO)
+ 31428-t.out
+ 31428-t.out
+ ot1ppl.fd 2001/06/04 font definitions for OT1/ppl.
+ omlzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OML/zplm.
+ omszplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMS/zplm.
+ omxzplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OMX/zplm.
+ ot1zplm.fd 2002/09/08 Fontinst v1.914 font definitions for OT1/zplm.
+ ts1pplj.fd 2004/09/06 font definitions for TS1/pplj.
+./images/048a.png
+./images/049a.png
+./images/052a.png
+./images/113a.png
+./images/114a.png
+./images/121a.png
+./images/129a.png
+./images/150a.png
+./images/151a.png
+./images/154a.png
+./images/167a.png
+./images/171a.png
+./images/174a.png
+./images/175a.png
+./images/175b.png
+./images/188a.png
+./images/190a.png
+./images/192a.png
+./images/213a.png
+./images/216a.png
+./images/216b.png
+./images/216c.png
+./images/218a.png
+./images/218b.png
+./images/220a.png
+./images/236a.png
+./images/237a.png
+./images/256a.png
+./images/258a.png
+./images/257a.png
+./images/258b.png
+./images/258c.png
+./images/260a.png
+./images/277a.png
+./images/289a.png
+./images/297a.png
+./images/343a.png
+./images/357a.png
+ 31428-t.ind
+ ***********
+
+ )
+Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
+ 6953 strings out of 94074
+ 93655 string characters out of 1165153
+ 149903 words of memory out of 1500000
+ 9289 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+50000
+ 66939 words of font info for 162 fonts, out of 1200000 for 2000
+ 645 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
+ 34i,12n,46p,270b,495s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,6000p,200000b,5000s
+{/usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/enc/dvips/base/8r.enc}</usr/share/texmf-texli
+ve/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/blues
+ky/cm/cmss12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmss17.pfb></
+usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-tex
+live/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmtt8.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/pub
+lic/mathpazo/fplmri.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/fpl/fplrc8
+a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/fpl/fplrij8a.pfb></usr/share
+/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/urw/palatino/uplb8a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fo
+nts/type1/urw/palatino/uplr8a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/urw/pal
+atino/uplri8a.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/gothic/ygoth.pfb
+>
+Output written on 31428-t.pdf (518 pages, 1983992 bytes).
+PDF statistics:
+ 3245 PDF objects out of 3580 (max. 8388607)
+ 730 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 131072)
+ 415 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)
+
diff --git a/31428-t/old/31428-t.zip b/31428-t/old/31428-t.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..40f25b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/31428-t/old/31428-t.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca669d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #31428 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/31428)