104 files changed, 10314 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/26023-8.txt b/26023-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e217059
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3241 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The League of Nations and its Problems, by 
+Lassa Oppenheim
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The League of Nations and its Problems
+       Three Lectures
+
+Author: Lassa Oppenheim
+
+Release Date: July 10, 2008 [EBook #26023]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LEAGUE OF NATIONS, ITS PROBLEMS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Stephen Blundell and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+                   CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL LAW
+                             AND DIPLOMACY
+
+                  Edited by L. OPPENHEIM, M.A., LL.D.
+
+              Membre de l'Institut de Droit International,
+ Whewell Professor of International Law in the University of Cambridge,
+    Honorary Member of the Royal Academy of Jurisprudence at Madrid,
+  Corresponding Member of the American Institute of International Law.
+
+
+                         THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+                            AND ITS PROBLEMS
+
+
+
+
+                    CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL
+                          LAW AND DIPLOMACY.
+
+Edited by L. OPPENHEIM, M.A., LL.D., Whewell Professor of International
+Law in the University of Cambridge.
+
+A GUIDE TO DIPLOMATIC PRACTICE. By the Right Hon. Sir ERNEST SATOW,
+G.C.M.G., LL.D., D.C.L., formerly Envoy Extraordinary and Minister
+Plenipotentiary. 2 Volumes. 8vo. 30_s._ net.
+
+INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND THIRD STATES. A Monograph. By RONALD F.
+ROXBURGH, of the Middle Temple, Barrister-at-Law; formerly Whewell
+International Law Scholar in the University of Cambridge; formerly
+Scholar of Trinity College, Cambridge. 8vo. 7_s._ 6_d._ net.
+
+                       LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.,
+           London, New York, Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras.
+
+
+
+
+                                  THE
+                           LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+                           AND ITS PROBLEMS
+
+
+                            THREE LECTURES
+
+
+                                  BY
+
+                       L. OPPENHEIM, M.A., LL.D.
+
+ WHEWELL PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
+    MEMBRE DE L'INSTITUT DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL. HONORARY MEMBER OF
+      THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF JURISPRUDENCE AT MADRID, CORRESPONDING
+                  MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF
+                           INTERNATIONAL LAW
+
+
+                                                       _Festina lente_
+
+
+                        LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.
+                      39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON
+                FOURTH AVENUE & 30TH STREET, NEW YORK,
+                     BOMBAY, CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS.
+                                 1919
+
+
+
+
+PREFACE
+
+
+The three lectures collected in this volume were prepared without any
+intention of publication. They were delivered for the purpose of drawing
+attention to the links which connect the proposal for a League of
+Nations with the past, to the difficulties which stand in the way of the
+realisation of the proposal, and to some schemes by which these
+difficulties might be overcome. When it was suggested that the lectures
+should be brought before the public at large by being issued in book
+form I hesitated, because I was doubtful whether the academic method
+natural to a University lecture would be suitable to a wider public.
+After consideration, however, I came to the conclusion that their
+publication might be useful, because the lectures attempt to show how
+the development initiated by the two Hague Peace Conferences could be
+continued by turning the movement for a League of Nations into the road
+of progress that these Conferences opened.
+
+Professional International lawyers do not share the belief that the
+outbreak of the World War and its, in many ways, lawless and atrocious
+conduct have proved the futility of the work of the Hague Conferences.
+Throughout these anxious years we have upheld the opinion that the
+progress initiated at the Hague has by no means been swept away by the
+attitude of lawlessness deliberately--'because necessity knows no
+law'--taken up by Germany, provided only that she should be utterly
+defeated, and should be compelled to atone and make ample reparation for
+the many cruel wrongs which cry to Heaven. While I am writing these
+lines, there is happily no longer any doubt that this condition will be
+fulfilled. We therefore believe that, after the map of Europe has been
+redrawn by the coming Peace Congress, the third Conference ought to
+assemble at the Hague for the purpose of establishing the demanded
+League of Nations and supplying it with the rudiments of an
+organisation.
+
+How this could be accomplished in a very simple way the following three
+lectures attempt to show. They likewise offer some very slight outlines
+of a scheme for setting up International Councils of Conciliation as
+well as an International Court of Justice comprising a number of
+Benches. I would ask the reader kindly to take these very lightly
+outlined schemes for what they are worth. Whatever may be their defects
+they indicate a way out of some of the great difficulties which beset
+the realisation of the universal demand for International Councils of
+Conciliation and an International Court of Justice.
+
+It is well known that several of the allied Governments have appointed
+Committees to study the problem of a League of Nations and to prepare a
+scheme which could be put before the coming Peace Congress. But unless
+all, or at any rate all the more important, neutral States are
+represented, it will be impossible for an all-embracing League of
+Nations to be created by that Congress; although a scheme could well be
+adopted which would keep the door open for all civilised States.
+However, until all these States have actually been received within the
+charmed circle, the League will not be complete nor its aims fully
+realised. Whatever the coming Peace Congress may be able to achieve with
+regard to a scheme for the establishment of the League of Nations,
+another--the third--Hague Peace Conference will be needed to set it
+going.
+
+                                                    L. OPPENHEIM.
+
+    P.S.--While this Preface and volume were going through the Press,
+    Austria-Hungary and Germany surrendered, and unprecedented
+    revolutions broke out which swept the Hapsburg, the Hohenzollern,
+    and all the other German dynasties away. No one can foresee what
+    will be the ultimate fate and condition of those two once mighty
+    empires. It is obvious that, had the first and second lectures been
+    delivered after these stirring events took place, some of the views
+    to be found therein expressed would have been modified or
+    differently expressed. I may ask the reader kindly to keep this in
+    mind while reading the following pages. However, the general bearing
+    of the arguments, and the proposals for the organisation of the
+    League of Nations and the establishment of an International Court of
+    Justice and International Councils of Conciliation, are in no way
+    influenced by these later events.
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+                                                                    PAGE
+
+ FIRST LECTURE: THE AIMS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS                      1
+
+   I. The purpose of the three Lectures is to draw attention to
+ the links which connect the proposed League of Nations with
+ the past, to the difficulties involved in the proposal, and to
+ the way in which they can be overcome                                 4
+
+   II. The conception of a League of Nations is not new, but is
+ as old as International Law, because any kind of International
+ Law and some kind of a League of Nations are interdependent and
+ correlative                                                           6
+
+   III. During antiquity no International Law in the modern
+ sense of the term was possible, because the common interests
+ which could force a number of independent States into a
+ Community of States were lacking                                      6
+
+   IV. But during the second part of the Middle Ages matters
+ began to change. During the fifteenth, sixteenth and
+ seventeenth centuries an International Law, and with it a kind
+ of League of Nations, became a necessity and therefore grew by
+ custom. At the same time arose the first schemes for a League
+ of Nations guaranteeing permanent peace, namely those of Pierre
+ Dubois (1305), Antoine Marini (1461), Sully (1603), and Emeric
+ Crucée (1623). Hugo Grotius' immortal work on 'The Law of War
+ and Peace' (1625)                                                     7
+
+   V. The League of Nations thus evolved by custom could not
+ undertake to prevent war; the conditions prevailing up to the
+ outbreak of the French Revolution made it impossible; it was
+ only during the nineteenth century that the principle of
+ nationality made growth                                               9
+
+   VI. The outbreak of the present World War is epoch-making
+ because it is at bottom a fight between the principle of
+ democratic and constitutional government and the principle of
+ militarism and autocratic government. The three new points in
+ the present demand for a League of Nations                           11
+
+   VII. How and why the peremptory demand for a new League of
+ Nations arose, and its connection with so-called
+ Internationalism                                                     11
+
+   VIII. The League of Nations now aimed at is not really a
+ League of Nations but of States. The ideal of the national
+ State                                                                13
+
+   IX. The two reasons why the establishment of a new League of
+ Nations is conditioned by the utter defeat of the Central
+ Powers                                                               15
+
+   X. Why--in a sense--the new League of Nations may be said to
+ have already started its career                                      16
+
+   XI. The impossibility of the demand that the new League of
+ Nations should create a Federal World State                          18
+
+   XII. The demand for an International Army and Navy                 20
+
+   XIII. The new League of Nations cannot give itself a
+ constitution of a state-like character, but only one _sui
+ generis_ on very simple lines                                        22
+
+   XIV. The three aims of the new League of Nations, and the
+ four problems to be faced and solved in order to make possible
+ the realisation of these aims                                        23
+
+
+ SECOND LECTURE: ORGANISATION AND LEGISLATION
+ OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS                                             25
+
+   I. The Community of civilised States, the at present
+ existing League of Nations, is a community without any
+ organisation, although there are plenty of legal rules for the
+ intercourse of the several States one with another                   28
+
+   II. The position of the Great Powers within the Community of
+ States is a mere political fact not based on Law                     29
+
+   III. The pacifistic demand or a Federal World State in order
+ to make the abolition of war a possibility                           31
+
+   IV. Every attempt at organising the desired new League of
+ Nations must start from, and keep intact, the independence and
+ equality of the several States, with the consequence that the
+ establishment of a central political authority above the
+ sovereign States is an impossibility                                 32
+
+   V. The development of an organisation of the Community of
+ States began before the outbreak of the World War and is to be
+ found in the establishment of the Permanent Court of
+ Arbitration at the Hague by the First Hague Peace Conference of
+ 1899. But more steps will be necessary to turn the hitherto
+ unorganised Community of States into an organised League of
+ Nations                                                              34
+
+   VI. The organisation of the desired new League of Nations
+ should start from the beginning made by the Hague Peace
+ Conferences, and the League should therefore include all the
+ independent civilised States                                         35
+
+   VII. The objection to the reception of the Central Powers,
+ and of Germany especially, into the League                           36
+
+   VIII. The objection to the reception of the minor
+ transoceanic States into the League                                  38
+
+   IX. The seven principles which ought to be accepted with
+ regard to the organisation of the new League of Nations              39
+
+   X. The organisation of the League of Nations is not an end in
+ itself but only a means of attaining three objects, the first
+ of which is International Legislation. The meaning of the term
+ 'International Legislation' in contradistinction to Municipal
+ Legislation. International Legislation in the past and in the
+ future                                                               41
+
+   XI. The difficulty in the way of International Legislation on
+ account of the language question                                     43
+
+   XII. The difficulty created by the conflicting national
+ interests of the several States                                      44
+
+   XIII. The difficulty caused by the fact that International
+ Statutes cannot be created by a majority vote of the States.
+ The difference between universal and general International Law
+ offers a way out                                                     44
+
+   XIV. The difficulty created by the fact that there are as yet
+ no universally recognised rules concerning interpretation and
+ construction of International Statutes and ordinary
+ Conventions. The notorious Article 23(h) of the Hague
+ Regulations concerning Land Warfare                                  45
+
+   _Appendix_: Correspondence with the Foreign Office respecting
+ the Interpretation of Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations
+ concerning Land Warfare                                              48
+
+
+ THIRD LECTURE: ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND
+ MEDIATION WITHIN THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS                               57
+
+   I. Administration of Justice within the League is a question
+ of International Courts, but it is incorrect to assert that
+ International Legislation necessitates the existence of
+ International Courts                                                 60
+
+   II. The Permanent Court of Arbitration created by the First
+ Hague Peace Conference                                               61
+
+   III. The difficulties connected with International
+ Administration of Justice by International Courts                    62
+
+   IV. The necessity for a Court of Appeal above the
+ International Court of First Instance                                63
+
+   V. The difficulties connected with the setting up and manning
+ of International Courts of Justice                                   64
+
+   VI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself because it
+ distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several
+ Benches which would be called upon to decide the cases               65
+
+   VII. The advantages of the recommended scheme                      67
+
+   VIII. A necessary provision for so-called complex cases of
+ dispute                                                              68
+
+   IX. A necessary provision with regard to the notorious clause
+ _rebus sic stantibus_                                                69
+
+   X. The two starting points for a satisfactory proposal
+ concerning International Mediation by International Councils of
+ Conciliation. Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning
+ Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. The Permanent
+ International Commissions of the Bryan Peace Treaties                70
+
+   XI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself for the
+ establishment of International Councils of Conciliation              72
+
+   XII. The question of disarmament                                   74
+
+   XIII. The assertion that States renounce their sovereignty by
+ entering into the League                                             75
+
+   XIV. Conclusion: Can it be expected that, in case of a great
+ conflict of interests, all the members of the League will
+ faithfully carry out their engagements?                              78
+
+
+ ALPHABETICAL INDEX                                                   81
+
+
+
+
+FIRST LECTURE
+
+THE AIMS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+
+    I. The purpose of the three Lectures is to draw attention to the
+    links which connect the proposed League of Nations with the past, to
+    the difficulties involved in the proposal, and to the way in which
+    they can be overcome.
+
+    II. The conception of a League of Nations is not new, but is as old
+    as International Law, because any kind of International Law and some
+    kind of a League of Nations are interdependent and correlative.
+
+    III. During antiquity no International Law in the modern sense of
+    the term was possible, because the common interests which could
+    force a number of independent States into a community of States were
+    lacking.
+
+    IV. But during the second part of the Middle Ages matters began to
+    change. During the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries
+    an International Law, and with it a kind of League of Nations,
+    became a necessity and therefore grew by custom. At the same time
+    arose the first schemes for a League of Nations guaranteeing
+    permanent peace, namely those of Pierre Dubois (1305), Antoine
+    Marini (1461), Sully (1603), and Emeric Crucée (1623). Hugo Grotius'
+    immortal work on 'The Law of War and Peace' (1625).
+
+    V. The League of Nations thus evolved by custom could not undertake
+    to prevent wars; the conditions prevailing up to the outbreak of the
+    French Revolution made it impossible; it was only during the
+    nineteenth century that the principle of nationality made growth.
+
+    VI. The outbreak of the present World War is epoch-making because it
+    is at bottom a fight between the principle of democratic and
+    constitutional government and the principle of militarism and
+    autocratic government. The three new points in the present demand
+    for a League of Nations.
+
+    VII. How and why the peremptory demand for a new League of Nations
+    arose, and its connection with so-called Internationalism.
+
+    VIII. The League of Nations now aimed at is not really a League of
+    Nations but of States. The ideal of the National State.
+
+    IX. The two reasons why the establishment of a new League of Nations
+    is conditioned by the utter defeat of the Central Powers.
+
+    X. Why--in a sense--the new League of Nations may be said to have
+    already started its career.
+
+    XI. The impossibility of the demand that the new League of Nations
+    should create a Federal World State.
+
+    XII. The demand for an International Army and Navy.
+
+    XIII. The new League of Nations cannot give itself a constitution of
+    a state-like character, but only one _sui generis_ on very simple
+    lines.
+
+    XIV. The three aims of the new League of Nations, and the four
+    problems to be faced and solved in order to make possible the
+    realisation of these aims.
+
+
+THE LECTURE
+
+I. Dr. Whewell, the founder of the Chair of International Law which I
+have the honour to occupy in this University, laid the injunction upon
+every holder of the Chair that he should 'make it his aim,' in all parts
+of his treatment of the subject, 'to lay down such rules and suggest
+such measures as may tend to diminish the evils of war and finally to
+extinguish war between nations.' It is to comply with the spirit, if not
+with the letter, of this injunction that I have announced the series of
+three lectures on a League of Nations. The present is the first, and in
+it I propose to treat of the Aims of the League. But, before I enter
+into a discussion of these aims, I should like to point out that I have
+no intention of dealing with the question whether or no a League of
+Nations should be founded at all. To my mind, and probably to the minds
+of most of you here, this question has been satisfactorily answered by
+the leading politicians of all parties and all countries since
+ex-President Taft put it soon after the outbreak of the World War; it
+suffices to mention Earl Grey in Great Britain and President Wilson in
+America. In giving these lectures I propose to draw your attention, on
+the one hand, to the links which connect the proposal for a League of
+Nations with the past, and, on the other hand, to the difficulties with
+which the realisation of the proposal must necessarily be attended; and
+also to the ways in which, in my opinion, these difficulties can be
+overcome.
+
+There is an old adage which says _Natura non facit saltus_, Nature takes
+no leaps. Everything in Nature develops gradually, step by step, and
+organically. It is, at any rate as a rule, the same with History.
+History in most cases takes no leaps, but if exceptionally History does
+take a leap, there is great danger of a bad slip backwards following. We
+must be on our guard lest the proposed League of Nations should take a
+leap in the dark, and the realisation of proposals be attempted which
+are so daring and so entirely out of keeping with the historical
+development of International Law and the growth of the Society of
+Nations, that there would be great danger of the whole scheme collapsing
+and the whole movement coming to naught.
+
+The movement for a League of Nations is sound, for its purpose is to
+secure a more lasting peace amongst the nations of the world than has
+hitherto prevailed. But a number of schemes to realise this purpose
+have been published which in my opinion go much too far because they
+comprise proposals which are not realisable in our days. You know that
+not only an International Court of Justice and an International Council
+of Conciliation have been proposed, but also some kind of International
+Government, some kind of International Parliament, an International
+Executive, and even an International Army and Navy--a so-called
+International Police--by the help of which the International Government
+could guarantee the condition of permanent peace in the world.
+
+II. You believe no doubt, because nearly everyone believes it, that the
+conception of a League of Nations is something quite new. Yet this is
+not the case, although there is something new in the present conception,
+something which did not exist previously. The conception of a League of
+Nations is very old, is indeed as old as modern International Law,
+namely about four hundred years. International Law could not have come
+into existence without at the same time calling into existence a League
+of Nations. _Any kind of an International Law and some kind or other of
+a League of Nations are interdependent and correlative._ This assertion
+possibly surprises you, and I must therefore say a few words concerning
+the origin of modern International Law in order to make matters clear.
+
+III. In ancient times no International Law in the modern sense of the
+term existed. It is true there existed rules of religion and of law
+concerning international relations, and ambassadors and heralds were
+everywhere considered sacrosanct. But these rules were not rules of an
+_International_ Law, they were either religious rules or rules which
+were part of the Municipal Law of the several States. For instance: the
+Romans had very detailed rules concerning their relations with other
+States in time of peace and war; but these were rules of Roman law, not
+rules of the law of other countries, and certainly not _international_
+rules.
+
+Now what was the reason that antiquity did not know of any International
+Law?
+
+The reason was that between the several independent States of antiquity
+no such intimate intercourse arose and no such common views existed as
+to necessitate a law between them. Only between the several city States
+of ancient Greece arose some kind of what we should now call
+'International Law,' because these city States formed a Community
+fostered by the same language, the same civilisation, the same religion,
+the same general ideas, and by constant commercial and other
+intercourse. On the other hand, the Roman Empire was a world empire, it
+gradually absorbed all the independent nations in the West. And when the
+Roman Empire fell to pieces in consequence of the migration of the
+peoples, the old civilisation came to an end, international commerce and
+intercourse ceased almost entirely, and it was not till towards the end
+of the Middle Ages that matters began to change.
+
+IV. During the second part of the Middle Ages more and more independent
+States arose on the European continent, and during the fifteenth and
+sixteenth centuries the necessity for a Law of Nations made itself felt.
+A multitude of Sovereign States had now established themselves which,
+although they were absolutely independent of one another, were knitted
+together by constant commercial and other intercourse, by a common
+religion, and by the same moral principles. Gradually and almost
+unconsciously the conviction had grown upon these independent States
+that, in spite of everything which separated them, they formed a
+Community the intercourse of which was ruled by certain legal
+principles. International Law grew out of custom because it was a
+necessity according to the well-known rule _ubi societas ibi jus_, where
+there is a community of interests there must be law. The several
+independent States had thus gradually and unconsciously formed
+themselves into a Society, the afterwards so-called Family of Nations,
+or, in other words, a League of Nations.
+
+And no sooner had this League of Nations come into existence--and even
+some time before that date--than a number of schemes for the
+establishment of eternal peace made their appearance.
+
+The first of these schemes was that of the French lawyer _Pierre
+Dubois_, who, as early as 1305, in his work 'De recuperatione terre
+sancte,' proposed an alliance between all Christian Powers for the
+purpose of the maintenance of peace and the establishment of a permanent
+Court of Arbitration for the settlement of differences between members
+of the alliance.
+
+Another was that of _Antoine Marini_, the Chancellor of Podiebrad, King
+of Bohemia, who adopted the scheme in 1461. This scheme proposed the
+foundation of a Federal State to comprise all the existing Christian
+States and the establishment of a permanent Congress to be seated at
+Basle in Switzerland, this Congress to be the highest organ of the
+Federation.
+
+A third scheme was that of _Sully_, adopted by Henri IV of France,
+which, in 1603, proposed the division of Europe into fifteen States and
+the linking together of these into a Federation with a General Council
+as its highest organ.
+
+And a fourth scheme was that of _Emeric Crucée_, who, in 1623, proposed
+the establishment of a Union consisting not only of the Christian States
+but of all States of the world, with a General Council seated at Venice.
+
+And since that time many other schemes of similar kind have made their
+appearance, the enumeration and discussion of which is outside our
+present purpose. So much is certain that all these schemes were Utopian.
+Nevertheless, a League of Nations having once come into existence,
+International Law grew more and more, and when in 1625 Hugo Grotius
+published his immortal work on 'The Law of War and Peace,' the system of
+International Law offered in his work conquered the world and became the
+basis of all following development.
+
+V. However, although a League of Nations must be said to have been in
+existence for about 400 years, because no International Law would have
+been possible without it, this League of Nations could not, and was not
+intended to, prevent war between its members. I say: it could not
+prevent war. Why not? It could not prevent war on account of the
+conditions which prevailed within the international society from the
+Middle Ages till, say, the outbreak of the present war. These conditions
+are intimately connected with the growth of the several States of
+Europe.
+
+Whereas the family, the tribe, and the race are natural products, the
+nation as well as the State are products of historical development. All
+nations are blends of more or less different races, and all States were
+originally founded on force: strong rulers subjected neighbouring tribes
+and peoples to their sway and thus formed coherent nations. Most of the
+States in Europe are the product of the activity of strong dynasties
+which through war and conquest, and through marriage and purchase,
+united under one sovereign the lands which form the States and the
+peoples which form the nations. Up to the time of the French Revolution,
+throughout the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, all
+wars were either wars of religion, or dynastic wars fought for the
+increase of the territory under the sway of the dynasties concerned, or
+so-called colonial wars fought for the acquisition of transoceanic
+colonies. It was not till the nineteenth century that wars for the
+purpose of national unity broke out, and dynastic wars began gradually
+to disappear. During the nineteenth century the nations, so to say,
+found themselves; some kind of constitutional government was everywhere
+introduced; and democracy became the ideal, although it was by no means
+everywhere realised.
+
+VI. It is for this reason that the outbreak of the present war is
+epoch-making, because it has become apparent that, whatever may be the
+war aims of the belligerents, at bottom this World War is a fight
+between the ideal of democracy and constitutional government on the one
+hand, and autocratic government and militarism on the other. Everywhere
+the conviction has become prevalent that things cannot remain as they
+were before the outbreak of the present war, and therefore the demand
+for a League of Nations, or--I had better say--for a new League of
+Nations to take the place of that which has been in existence for about
+400 years, has arisen.
+
+Now what is new in the desired new League of Nations?
+
+Firstly, this new League would be founded upon a solemn treaty, whereas
+the League of Nations hitherto was only based upon custom.
+
+Secondly, for the purpose of making war rarer or of abolishing it
+altogether, this new League of Nations would enact the rule that no
+State is allowed to resort to arms without previously having submitted
+the dispute to an International Court or a Council of Conciliation.
+
+Thirdly, this new League of Nations would be compelled to create some
+kind of organisation for itself, because otherwise it could not realise
+its purpose to make war rarer or abolish it altogether.
+
+VII. The demand for a new League of Nations is universal, for it is
+made, not only everywhere in the allied countries, but in the countries
+of the Central Powers, and it will surely be realised when the war is
+over, at any rate to a certain extent. It is for this reason that the
+present World War has not only not destroyed so-called Internationalism,
+but has done more for it than many years of peace could have done.
+
+What is Internationalism?
+
+Internationalism is the conviction that all the civilised States form
+one Community throughout the world in spite of the various factors which
+separate the nations from one another; the conviction that the interests
+of all the nations and States are indissolubly interknitted, and that,
+therefore, the Family of Nations must establish international
+institutions for the purpose of guaranteeing a more general and a more
+lasting peace than existed in former times. Internationalism had made
+great strides during the second part of the nineteenth century on
+account of the enormous development of international commerce and
+international communication favoured by railways, the steamship, the
+telegraph, and a great many scientific discoveries and technical
+inventions. But what a disturbing and destroying factor war really is,
+had not become fully apparent till the present war, because this is a
+_world_ war which interferes almost as much with the welfare of neutrals
+as with the welfare of belligerents. It has become apparent during the
+present war that the discoveries and developments of science and
+technology, which had done so much during the second half of the
+nineteenth century for the material welfare of the human race during
+peace, were likewise at the disposal of belligerents for an enormous,
+and hitherto unthought-of, destruction of life and wealth. It is for
+this reason that in the camp of friend and foe, among neutrals as well
+as among belligerents, the conviction has become universal that the
+conditions of international life prevailing before the outbreak of the
+World War must be altered; that international institutions must be
+established which will make the outbreak of war, if not impossible, at
+any rate only an exceptional possibility. The demand for a new League of
+Nations has thus arisen and peremptorily requires fulfilment.
+
+VIII. However, in considering the demand for a new League of Nations, it
+is necessary to avoid confusing nations with States. It should always be
+remembered that, when we speak of a League of Nations, we do not really
+mean a League of Nations but a League of States. It is true that there
+are many States in existence which in the main are made up of one
+nation, although fractions of other nations may be comprised in them.
+But it is equally true that there are some States in existence which
+include members of several nations. Take as an example Switzerland
+which, although only a very small State, nevertheless comprises three
+national elements, namely German, French, and Italian. Another example
+is the British Empire, which is a world empire and comprises a number of
+different nations.
+
+That leads me to the question: What is a nation?
+
+A nation must not be confounded with a race. A nation is a product of
+historical development, whereas a race is a product of natural growth.
+One speaks of a nation when a complex body of human beings is united by
+living in the same land, by the same language, the same literature, the
+same historical traditions, and the same general views of life. All
+nations are a mixture of several diverse racial elements which in the
+course of historical development have to a certain extent been united by
+force of circumstances. The Swiss as a people are politically a nation,
+although the component parts of the population of Switzerland are of
+different national characters and even speak different languages.
+Historical development in general, and in many cases force in
+particular, have played a great part in the blending of diverse racial
+elements into nations; just as they have played a great part in the
+building up of States. The demand that every nation should have a
+separate State of its own--the ideal of the so-called national
+State--appears very late in history; it is a product of the last two
+centuries, and it was not till the second half of the nineteenth century
+that the so-called principle of nationality made its appearance and
+gained great influence. It may well be doubted whether each nation, be
+it ever so small, will succeed in establishing a separate State of its
+own, although where national consciousness becomes overwhelmingly
+strong, it will probably in every case succeed in time either in
+establishing a State of its own, or at any rate in gaining autonomy. Be
+that as it may, it is a question for the future; so much is certain,
+what is intended now to be realised, is not a League of Nations, but a
+League of States, although it is called a League of Nations.
+
+IX. However, no League of Nations is possible unless the Central Powers,
+and Germany in especial, are utterly defeated during the World War, and
+that for two reasons.
+
+One reason is that a great alteration of the map of Europe is an
+absolutely necessary condition for the satisfactory working of a League
+of Nations. Unless an independent Poland be established; unless the
+problem of Alsace-Lorraine be solved; unless the Trentino be handed over
+to Italy; unless the Yugo-Slavs be united with Servia; unless the
+Czecho-Slovaks be freed from the Austrian yoke; and unless the problem
+of Turkey and the Turkish Straits be solved, no lasting peace can be
+expected in Europe, even if a League of Nations be established.
+
+The other reason is that, unless Germany be utterly defeated, the spirit
+of militarism, which is not compatible with a League of Nations, will
+remain a menace to the world.
+
+What is militarism? It is that conception of the State which bases the
+power of the State, its influence, its progress, and its development
+exclusively on military force. The consequence is that war becomes part
+of the settled policy of a militarist State; the acquisition of further
+territory and population by conquest is continually before the eyes of
+such a Government; and the condition of peace is only a shorter or
+longer interval between periods of war. A military State submits to
+International Law only so long as it serves its interests, but violates
+International Law, and particularly International Law concerning war,
+wherever and whenever this law stands in the way of its military aims.
+The whole history of Prussia exemplifies this. Now in a League of
+Nations peace must be the normal condition. If war occurs at all within
+such a League, it can only be an exceptional phase and must be only for
+the purpose of re-establishing peace. It is true a League of Nations
+will not be able entirely to dispense with military force, yet such
+force appears only in the background as an _ultima ratio_ to be applied
+against such Power as refuses to submit its disagreements with other
+members of the League either to an International Court of Justice or an
+International Council of Conciliation.
+
+X. Be that as it may, in a sense the League of Nations has already
+started its career, because twenty-five States are united on the one
+side and are fighting this war in vindication of International Law.
+These States are--I enumerate them chronologically as they entered into
+the war:--Russia (the Bolsheviks have made peace, but in fact one may
+still enumerate Russia as a belligerent), France, Belgium, Great
+Britain, Servia, Montenegro, Japan, San Marino, Portugal, Italy,
+Roumania, the United States, Cuba, Panama, Greece, Siam, Liberia, China,
+Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Haiti, Honduras.
+Besides these twenty-five States which are at war with the Central
+Powers, the following four States, without having declared war, have
+broken off diplomatic relations with Germany, namely: Bolivia, San
+Domingo, Peru, Uruguay.
+
+Now there may be said to be about fifty civilised States in existence.
+Of these, as I have just pointed out, twenty-five are fighting against
+the Central Powers, four have broken off relations with Germany, the
+Central Powers themselves are four in number, with the consequence that
+thirty-three of the fifty States are implicated in the war. Only the
+seventeen remaining States are neutral, namely: Sweden, Norway, Denmark,
+Holland, Luxemburg, Switzerland, Spain, Lichtenstein, and Monaco in
+Europe; Mexico, Salvador, Colombia, Venezuela, Chile, Argentina, and
+Paraguay in America; and Persia in Asia.
+
+It may be taken for granted that all the neutral States, and all the
+States fighting on the side of the Allies, and also the four States
+which, although they are not fighting on the side of the Allies, have
+broken off relations with Germany, are prepared to enter into a League
+of Nations.
+
+But what about the Central Powers, and Germany in especial? I shall
+discuss in my next lecture the question whether the Central Powers are
+to become members of the League. To-day it must suffice to say that,
+when once utterly defeated, they will be only too glad to be received as
+members. On the other hand, if they were excluded, the world would again
+be divided into two rival camps, just as before the war the Triple
+Alliance was faced by the Entente. No disarmament would be possible, and
+with regard to every other matter progress would be equally impossible.
+Therefore the Central Powers must become members of a League of Nations
+for such a League to be of any great use, which postulates as a _sine
+qua non_ that Germany must be utterly defeated in the present war. If
+she were victorious, or if peace were concluded with an undefeated
+Germany, the world would not be ripe for a League of Nations because
+militarism would not have been exterminated.
+
+XI. I have hitherto discussed the League of Nations only in a general
+way, without mentioning that there is no unanimity concerning its aims
+or concerning the details of its organisation. Many people think that it
+would be possible to do away with war for ever, and they therefore
+demand a World State, a Federal State comprising all the single States
+of the world on the pattern of the United States of America. And for
+this reason the demand is raised not only for an International Court and
+for an International Council of Conciliation, but also for an
+International Government, an International Parliament, and an
+International Army and Navy,--a so-called International Police.
+
+I believe that these demands go much too far and are impossible of
+realisation. A Federal State comprising all the single States of the
+whole civilised world is a Utopia, and an International Army and Navy
+would be a danger to the peace of the world.
+
+Why is a World State not possible, at any rate not in our time?
+
+No one has ever thought that a World State in the form of one single
+State with one single Government would be possible. Those who plead for
+a World State plead for it in the form of a Federal State comprising all
+the single States of the world on the pattern of the United States of
+America. But even this modified ideal is not, in my opinion, realisable
+at present. Why not? To realise this ideal there would be required a
+Federal Government, and a Federal Parliament; and the Federal Government
+would have to possess strong powers to enforce its demands. A powerless
+Federal Government would be worse than no government at all. But how is
+it possible to establish at present a powerful Federal Government over
+the whole world? How is it possible to establish a Federal World
+Parliament?
+
+Constitutional Government within the several States has to grapple with
+many difficulties, and these difficulties would be more numerous,
+greater, and much more complicated within a Federal World State. We need
+democracy and constitutional Government in every single State, and this
+can only be realised by party Government and elections of Parliament at
+short intervals. The waves of party strife rise high within the several
+States; no sooner is one party in, than the other party looks out for an
+opening into which a wedge can be pushed to turn the Government out. In
+normal times this works on the whole quite well within the borders of
+the several States, because the interests concerned are not so widely
+opposed to one another that the several parties cannot alternatively
+govern. But when it comes to applying the same system of Government to a
+Federal World State, the interests at stake are too divergent. The East
+and the West, the South and the North, the interests of maritime States
+and land-locked States, the ideals and interests of industrial and
+agricultural States, and many other contrasts, are too great for it to
+be possible to govern a Federal World State by the same institutions as
+a State of ordinary size and composition.
+
+The British World Empire may be taken as an example to show that it is
+impossible for one single central Government to govern a number of
+States with somewhat divergent interests. We all know that the British
+Empire comprising the United Kingdom and the so-called independent
+dominions, namely Canada, Newfoundland, Australia, New Zealand, and
+South Africa, is kept together not really by the powers of the British
+Government but by the good will of the component parts. The Government
+of the United Kingdom could not keep the Empire together by force, could
+not compel by force one of the independent dominions to submit to a
+demand, in case it refused to comply. The interests of the several
+component parts of the British Empire are so divergent that no central
+Government could keep them together against their will. Now what applies
+to the British Empire, which is to a great extent bound together by the
+same language, the same literature, and the same Law, would apply much
+more to a Federal State comprising the whole of the world: such a
+Federal State, so far as we can see, is impossible.
+
+XII. But what about an International Army and Navy?
+
+It is hardly worth while to say much about them. Those who propose the
+establishment of an International Army and Navy presuppose that the
+national armies and navies would be abolished so that the world
+Government would have the power, with the help of the International Army
+and Navy, at any moment to crush any attempt of a recalcitrant member of
+the Federal World State to avoid its duties. This International Army and
+Navy would be the most powerful instrument of force which the world has
+ever seen, because every attempt to resist it would be futile. And the
+Commander of the International Army and the Commander of the
+International Navy would be men holding in their hands the greatest
+power that can be imagined.
+
+The old question therefore arises: _Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?_
+which I should like here to translate freely by: Who will keep in order
+those who are to keep the world in order? A League of Nations which can
+only be kept together by a powerful International Army and Navy, is a
+contradiction in itself; for the independence and equality of the member
+States of the League would soon disappear. It is a fact--I make this
+statement although I am sure it will be violently contradicted--that,
+just as hitherto, so within a League of Nations some kind of Balance of
+Power only can guarantee the independence and equality of the smaller
+States. For the Community of Power, on which the League of Nations must
+rest, would at once disappear if one or two members of the League became
+so powerful that they could disregard the combined power of the other
+members. Every scheme of this movement must therefore see to it that no
+member of the League is more armed than is necessary considering the
+extent of its territory and other factors concerned. But be that as it
+may, an International Army and Navy is practically impossible, just as a
+Federal World State is impossible.
+
+XIII. Yet while a Federal World State is impossible, a League of Nations
+is not, provided such league gives itself a constitution, not of a
+state-like character, but one _sui generis_. What can be done is this:
+the hitherto unorganised Family of Nations can organise itself on simple
+lines so as to secure, on the one hand, the absolute independence of
+every State, and, on the other hand, the peaceful co-existence of all
+the States.
+
+It is possible, in my opinion, to establish an International Court of
+Justice before which the several States engage to appear in case a
+conflict arises between two or more of them which can be judicially
+settled, that is, can be settled by a rule of law. There is as little
+reason why two or more States should go to war on account of a conflict
+which can be settled upon the basis of law, as there is for two private
+individuals to resort to arms in case of a dispute between them which
+can be decided by a Court of Law.
+
+Again, although there will frequently arise between States conflicts of
+a political character which cannot be settled on the basis of a rule of
+law, there is no reason why, when the States in conflict cannot settle
+them by diplomatic negotiation, they should resort to arms, before
+bringing the conflict before some Council of Conciliation and giving the
+latter an opportunity of investigating the matter and proposing a fair
+compromise.
+
+Under modern conditions of civilisation the whole world suffers in case
+war breaks out between even only two States, and for this reason it is
+advisable that the rest of the world should unite and oppose such State
+as would resort to arms without having submitted its case to an
+International Court of Justice or an International Council of
+Conciliation.
+
+XIV. In my opinion the aims of a League of Nations should therefore be
+three:
+
+The first aim should be to prevent the outbreak of war altogether on
+account of so-called judicial disputes, that is disputes which can be
+settled on the basis of a rule of law. For this reason the League should
+stipulate that every State must submit all judicial disputes without
+exception to an International Court of Justice and must abide by the
+judgment of such Court.
+
+The second aim should be to prevent the sudden outbreak of war on
+account of a political dispute and to insist on an opportunity for
+mediation. For this reason the League should stipulate that every State,
+previous to resorting to arms over a political dispute, must submit it
+to an International Council of Conciliation and must at any rate listen
+to the advice of such Council.
+
+The third aim should be to provide a sanction for the enforcement of the
+two rules just mentioned. For this reason the League should stipulate
+that all the member States of the League must unite their economic,
+military, and naval forces against such member or members as would
+resort to arms either on account of a judicial dispute which ought to
+have been settled by an International Court of Justice, or on account of
+a political dispute without previously having submitted it to an
+International Council of Conciliation and listened to the latter's
+advice.
+
+These should be, in my opinion, the three aims of a League of Nations
+and the three rules necessary for the realisation of these aims.
+However, it is not so easy to realise them, and it is therefore
+necessary to face and solve four problems: There is, firstly, the
+problem of the Organisation of the League; secondly, the problem of
+Legislation within the League; thirdly, the problem of Administration of
+Justice within the League; and fourthly, the problem of Mediation within
+the League--four problems which I shall discuss in the two following
+lectures.
+
+I have only named three aims and four problems because I have in my mind
+those aims which are the nearest and those problems which are the most
+pressing and the most urgent. The range of vision of the League of
+Nations, when once established, will no doubt gradually become wider and
+wider; new aims will arise and new problems will demand solution, but
+all such possible future aims and future problems are outside the scope
+of these lectures.
+
+
+
+
+SECOND LECTURE
+
+ORGANISATION AND LEGISLATION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+
+    I. The Community of civilised States, the at present existing League
+    of Nations, is a community without any organisation, although there
+    are plenty of legal rules for the intercourse of the several States
+    one with another.
+
+    II. The position of the Great Powers within the Community of States
+    is a mere political fact not based on Law.
+
+    III. The pacifistic demand for a Federal World State in order to
+    make the abolition of war a possibility.
+
+    IV. Every attempt at organising the desired new League of Nations
+    must start from, and keep intact, the independence and equality of
+    the several States, with the consequence that the establishment of a
+    central political authority above the sovereign States is an
+    impossibility.
+
+    V. The development of an organisation of the Community of States
+    began before the outbreak of the World War and is to be found in the
+    establishment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague by
+    the First Hague Peace Conference of 1899. But more steps will be
+    necessary to turn the hitherto unorganised Community of States into
+    an organised League of Nations.
+
+    VI. The organisation of the desired new League of Nations should
+    start from the beginning made by the Hague Peace Conferences, and
+    the League should therefore include all the independent civilised
+    States.
+
+    VII. The objection to the reception of the Central Powers, and of
+    Germany especially, into the League.
+
+    VIII. The objection to the reception of the minor transoceanic
+    States into the League.
+
+    IX. The seven principles which ought to be accepted with regard to
+    the organisation of the new League of Nations.
+
+    X. The organisation of the League of Nations is not an end in itself
+    but only a means of attaining three objects, the first of which is
+    International Legislation. The meaning of the term 'International
+    Legislation' in contradistinction to Municipal Legislation.
+    International Legislation in the past and in the future.
+
+    XI. The difficulty in the way of International Legislation on
+    account of the language question.
+
+    XII. The difficulty created by the conflicting national interests of
+    the several States.
+
+    XIII. The difficulty caused by the fact that International Statutes
+    cannot be created by a majority vote of the States. The difference
+    between universal and general International Law offers a way out.
+
+    XIV. The difficulty created by the fact that there are as yet no
+    universally recognised rules concerning interpretation and
+    construction of International Statutes and ordinary conventions. The
+    notorious Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+    Warfare.
+
+
+THE LECTURE
+
+
+I. In my first lecture on the League of Nations I recommended the
+following three rules to be laid down by a League of Nations:
+
+Firstly, every State must submit all judicial disputes to an
+International Court of Justice and must abide by the judgment of such
+Court.
+
+Secondly, every State previous to resorting to arms, must submit every
+political and non-judicial dispute to an International Council of
+Conciliation and must at any rate listen to the advice of such Council.
+
+Thirdly, the member States must unite their forces against such State or
+States as should resort to arms without previously having submitted the
+matter in dispute to an International Court of Justice or to an
+International Council of Conciliation.
+
+And I added that these three rules cannot create a satisfactory
+condition of affairs unless four problems are faced and solved, namely:
+The Organisation of the League, Legislation by the League,
+Administration of Justice and Mediation within the League. My lecture
+to-day will deal with two of these problems, namely the Organisation and
+the Legislation of the League.
+
+Let us first consider the Organisation of the League. Hitherto the body
+of civilised States which form the Family of Nations and which, as I
+pointed out in my first lecture, is really a League of Nations evolved
+by custom, has been an unorganised Community. This means that, although
+there are plenty of legal rules for the intercourse of the several
+States one with another, the Community of civilised States does not
+possess any permanently established organs or agents for the conduct of
+its common affairs. At present these affairs, if they are peaceably
+settled, are either settled by ordinary diplomatic negotiation or, if
+the matter is pressing and of the greatest importance, by temporarily
+convened International Conferences or Congresses.
+
+II. It is true there are the so-called Great Powers which are the
+leaders of the Family of Nations, and it is therefore asserted by some
+authorities that the Community of States has acquired a certain amount
+of organisation because the Great Powers are the legally recognised
+superiors of the minor States.
+
+But is this assertion correct? The Great Powers, are they really the
+legally recognised superiors of the minor States?
+
+I deny it. A Great Power is any large-sized State possessing a large
+population which gains such economic, military, and naval strength that
+its political influence must be reckoned with by all the other Powers.
+At the time of the outbreak of the World War eight States had to be
+considered as Great Powers, namely Great Britain, Austria-Hungary,
+France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the United States of America, and Japan.
+But it is very probable that the end of the World War will see the
+number of Great Powers reduced to six. The collapse and break up of
+Russia has surely for the present eliminated her from the number of
+Great Powers. And it is quite certain that Austria-Hungary will not
+emerge from the struggle as a Great Power, if she emerges from it as a
+whole at all. History teaches that the number of the Great Powers is by
+no means stable, and changes occasionally take place. Look at the
+condition of affairs during the nineteenth century. Whereas at the time
+of the Vienna Congress in 1815 eight States, namely Great Britain,
+Austria, France, Portugal, Prussia, Spain, Sweden, and Russia were still
+considered Great Powers, their number soon decreased to five, because
+Portugal, Spain, and Sweden ceased to be Great Powers. On the other
+hand, Italy joined the number of the Great Powers after her unification
+in 1860; the United States of America joined the Great Powers after the
+American Civil War in 1865; and Japan emerged as a Great Power from her
+war with China in 1895.
+
+Be that as it may, so much is certain, a State is a Great Power not by
+law but only by its political influence. The Great Powers are the
+leaders of the Family of Nations because their political influence is
+so great. Their political and economic influence is in the long run
+irresistible; therefore all arrangements made by the Great Powers
+naturally in most cases gain, either at once or in time, the consent of
+the minor States. It may be said that the Great Powers exercise a kind
+of political hegemony within the Family of Nations. Yet this hegemony is
+not based on law, it is simply a political fact, and it is certainly not
+a consequence of an organisation of the Family of Nations.
+
+III. The demand for a proper organisation of the Community of States
+had, up to the outbreak of the World War, been raised exclusively on the
+part of the so-called Pacifists in order to make the abolition of war a
+possibility. It is a common assertion on the part of the Pacifists that
+War cannot die out so long as there is no Central Political Authority in
+existence above the several States which could compel them to bring
+their disputes before an International Court and also compel them to
+carry out the judgments of such a Court. For this reason many Pacifists
+aim at such an organisation of the Community of States as would bring
+all the civilised States of the world within the bonds of a federation.
+They demand a World Federation of all the civilised States, or at any
+rate a federation of the States of Europe, on the model of the United
+States of America.
+
+If such a Federal World State were practically possible, there would be
+no objection to it, although International Law as such would cease to
+exist and be replaced by the Constitutional Law of this Federal World
+State. But in my first lecture I pointed out that such a Federal World
+State is practically impossible. And it is not even desirable.
+
+The development of mankind would seem in the main to be indissolubly
+connected with the national development of the peoples. Most peoples
+possessing a strong national consciousness desire an independent State
+in which they can live according to their own ideals. They want to be
+their own masters, and not to be part and parcel of a Federal World
+State to which they would have to surrender a great part of their
+independence. Moreover--as I likewise pointed out in my first lecture
+(pp. 18-20)--it would be impossible to establish a strong Government and
+a strong Parliament in a Federal World State.
+
+However this may be, it is not at all certain that war would altogether
+disappear in a Federal World State. The history of Federal States
+teaches that wars do occasionally break out between their member States.
+Think of the war between the Roman Catholic and the Protestant member
+States of the Swiss Confederation in 1847, of the war in 1863 between
+the Northern and the Southern member States within the Federation which
+is called the United States of America, and of the war between Prussia
+and Austria within the German Confederation in 1866.
+
+IV. But what kind of organisation of the League of Nations is possible
+if we reject the idea of a Federal State?
+
+Neither I, nor anyone else who does not like to build castles in the
+air, can answer this question directly by making a detailed proposal. It
+is at present quite impossible to work out a practical scheme according
+to which a more detailed organisation of the League of Nations could be
+realised. But so much is certain that every attempt at organising this
+League must start from, and must keep intact, the independence and the
+equality of all civilised States. It is for this reason that a Central
+Political Authority above the sovereign States can never be thought of.
+Every attempt to organise a League of Nations on the model of a Federal
+State is futile. If a detailed organisation of the League should ever
+come, it will be one _sui generis_, one absolutely of its own kind; such
+as has never been seen before. And it is at present quite impossible to
+map out a detailed plan of such an organisation although, as I shall
+have to show you later, the first step towards an organisation has
+already been made, and further steps towards the ideal can be taken. The
+reason that it is at present impossible is that the growth and the final
+shape of the organisation of the League of Nations will, and must, go
+hand in hand with the progress of International Law. But the progress of
+International Law is conditioned by the growth, the strengthening, and
+the deepening of international economic and other interests, and of
+international morality. It is a matter of course that this progress can
+only be realised very slowly, for there is concerned a process of
+development through many generations and perhaps through centuries, a
+development whose end no one can foresee. It is sufficient for us to
+state that the development had already begun before the World War, and
+to try to foster it, as far as is in our power, after the conclusion of
+peace.
+
+V. I said that this development has begun. Where is this beginning of
+the development to be found?
+
+It is to be found in the establishment of the Permanent Court of
+Arbitration at the Hague and the Office therewith connected. The
+Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an institution of the several
+States, but an institution of the Community of States in
+contradistinction to its several members. Had the International Prize
+Court agreed upon by the Second Hague Peace Conference of 1907 been
+established, there would have come into existence another institution of
+the Community of States.
+
+But the establishment of International Courts would not justify the
+assertion that thereby the Community of States has turned from an
+unorganised community into an organised community. To reach this goal
+another step is required, namely an agreement amongst the Powers,
+according to which the Hague Peace Conferences would be made a permanent
+institution which periodically, within fixed intervals, assemble without
+being convened by one Power or another. If this were done, we could say
+that the hitherto unorganised Community of States had turned into an
+organised League of Nations, for by such periodically assembling Hague
+Peace Conferences there would be established an organ for the conduct
+of all such international matters as require international legislation
+or other international action.
+
+However that may be, the organisation created by the fact that the Hague
+Peace Conferences periodically assembled, would only be an immature one;
+more steps would be necessary in order that the organisation of the
+Community of States might become more perfect and more efficient. Yet
+progress would be slow, for every attempt at a progressive step meets
+with opposition, and it would be only when the _international_ interests
+of the civilised States become victorious over their particular
+_national_ interests that the Community of States would gradually
+receive a more perfect organisation.
+
+VI. There is no doubt that the experiences of mankind during the World
+War have been quickening development more than could have been expected
+in normal times. The universal demand for a new League of Nations
+accepting the principles that every judicial dispute amongst nations
+must be settled by International Courts and that every political dispute
+must, before the parties resort to arms, be brought before a Council of
+Conciliation, demonstrates clearly that the Community of States must now
+deliberately give itself some kind of organisation, because without it
+the principles just mentioned cannot be realised.
+
+Now a number of schemes for the organisation of a new League of Nations
+have been made public. They all agree upon the three aims of the League
+and the three rules for the realisation of these aims which I mentioned
+in my first lecture, namely compulsory settlement of all judicial
+disputes by International Courts of Justice, compulsory mediation in
+cases of political disputes by an International Council of Conciliation,
+and the duty of the members of the League to turn against any one member
+which should resort to arms in violation of the principles laid down by
+the League. However, these schemes differ very much with regard to the
+_organisation_ of the League. I cannot now discuss the various schemes
+in detail. It must suffice to say that some of them embody proposals for
+a more or less state-like organisation and are therefore not acceptable
+to those who share my opinion that any state-like organisation of the
+League is practically impossible. But though some of the schemes, as for
+instance that of Lord Bryce and that of Sir Willoughby Dickinson, avoid
+this mistake, none of them take as their starting point that which I
+consider to be the right one, namely the beginning made at the two Hague
+Peace Conferences. _In my opinion the organisation of a new League of
+Nations should start from the beginning made by the two Hague Peace
+Conferences._
+
+VII. However, there is much objection to this, because it would
+necessitate the admission into the new League of all those States which
+took part in the Second Hague Peace Conference, including, of course,
+the Central Powers. The objections to such a wide range of the League
+are two-fold.
+
+In the first instance, the admission of the Central Powers, and
+especially of Germany, into the League is deprecated. By her attack on
+Belgium at the outbreak of the war, and by her general conduct of the
+war, Germany has deliberately taken up an attitude which proves that,
+when her military interests are concerned, she does not consider herself
+bound by any treaty, by any rule of law, or by any principle of
+humanity. How can we expect that she will carry out the engagements into
+which she might enter by becoming a member of the League of Nations?
+
+My answer is that, provided she be utterly defeated and no peace of
+compromise be made with her, militarism in Germany will be doomed, the
+reparation to be exacted from her for the many cruel wrongs must lead to
+a change of Constitution and Government, and this change of Constitution
+and Government will make Germany a more acceptable member of a new
+League of Nations. The utter defeat of Germany is a necessary
+preliminary condition to the possibility of her entrance into a League
+of Nations. Those who speak of the foundation of a League of Nations as
+a means of ending the World War by a peace of compromise with Germany
+are mistaken. The necessary presuppositions of such a League are
+entirely incompatible with an unbroken Prussian militarism.
+
+But while her utter defeat is the necessary preliminary condition to her
+entrance into a League of Nations, the inclusion of Germany in the
+League, after her utter defeat, is likewise a necessity. The reason is
+that, as I pointed out in my first lecture (p. 17), in case the Central
+Powers were excluded from the League, they would enter into a League of
+their own, and the world would then be divided into two rival camps, in
+the same way as before the war the Triple Alliance was faced by the
+Entente. _The world would be proved not ripe for a new League of Nations
+if peace were concluded with an undefeated Germany; and the League would
+miss its purpose if to a defeated and repenting Germany entrance into it
+were refused._
+
+VIII. In the second instance, the entrance of the great number of minor
+transoceanic States into the League is deprecated because these States
+would claim an equal vote with the European Powers and thereby obstruct
+progress within the League.
+
+It is asserted that some of the minor transatlantic States made the
+discussions at the Hague Conferences futile by their claim to an equal
+vote. Now it is true that some of these States have to a certain extent
+impeded the work of the Hague Conferences, but some of the minor States
+of Europe, and even some of the Great Powers, have done likewise. The
+Community of States consisting of sovereign States does not possess any
+means of compelling a minority of States to fall in with the views of
+the majority, but I shall show you very soon, when I approach the
+problem of International Legislation, that International Legislation of
+a kind is possible in spite of this fact. And so much is certain that
+the minimum of organisation of the new League which is now necessary,
+cannot be considered to be endangered by the admittance of the minor
+transoceanic States into the League. Progress will in any case be slow,
+and perfect unanimity among the Powers will in any and every case only
+be possible where the _international_ interests of all the Powers compel
+them to put aside their real or imaginary particular _national_
+interests.
+
+IX. For these reasons I take it for granted that the organisation of a
+new League of Nations should start from the beginning made by the Hague
+Peace Conferences. Therefore the following seven principles ought to be
+accepted:
+
+    First principle: The League of Nations is composed of all civilised
+    States which recognise one another's external and internal
+    independence and absolute equality before International Law.
+
+    Second principle: The chief organ of the League is the Peace
+    Conference at the Hague. The Peace Conferences meet
+    periodically--say every two or three years--without being convened
+    by any special Power. Their task is the gradual codification of
+    International Law and the agreement upon such International
+    Conventions as are from time to time necessitated by new
+    circumstances and conditions.
+
+    Third principle: A permanent Council of the Conference is to be
+    created, the members of which are to be resident at the Hague and
+    are to conduct all the current business of the League of Nations.
+    This current business comprises: The preparation of the meetings of
+    the Peace Conference; the conduct of communications with the several
+    members of the League with regard to the preparation of the work of
+    the Peace Conferences; and all other matters of international
+    interest which the Conference from time to time hands over to the
+    Council.
+
+    Fourth principle: Every recognised sovereign State has a right to
+    take part in the Peace Conferences.
+
+    Fifth principle: Resolutions of the Conference can come into force
+    only in so far as they become ratified by the several States
+    concerned. On the other hand, every State agrees once for all
+    faithfully to carry out those resolutions which have been ratified
+    by it.
+
+    Sixth principle: Every State that takes part in the Peace
+    Conferences is bound only by such resolutions of the Conferences as
+    it expressly agrees to and ratifies. Resolutions of a majority only
+    bind the majority. On the other hand, no State has a right to demand
+    that only such resolutions as it agrees to shall be adopted.
+
+    Seventh principle: All members of the League of Nations agree once
+    for all to submit all judicial disputes to International Courts
+    which are to be set up, and to abide by their judgments. They
+    likewise agree to submit, previous to resorting to arms, all
+    non-judicial disputes to International Councils of Conciliation
+    which are to be set up. And they all agree to unite their economic,
+    military, and naval forces against any one or more States which
+    resort to arms without submitting their disputes to International
+    Courts of Justice or International Councils of Conciliation.
+
+You will have noticed that my proposals do not comprise the creation of
+an International Government, an International Executive, an
+International Parliament, and an International Army and Navy which would
+serve as an International Police Force. No one can look into the future
+and say what it will bring, but it is certain that for the present, and
+for some generations to come, all attempts at creating an International
+Government are not only futile but dangerous; because it is almost
+certain that a League of Nations comprising an International Executive,
+an International Parliament, and an International Army and Navy would
+soon collapse.
+
+X. However this may be, and whatever may be the details of the
+organisation of the League, such necessary organisation is not an end in
+itself but a means of attaining three objects, namely: International
+Legislation, International Administration of Justice, and International
+Mediation. I shall discuss International Administration of Justice and
+International Mediation in my next lecture, to-day I will only draw your
+attention to International Legislation.
+
+In using the term 'International Legislation,' it must be understood
+that 'legislation' is here to be understood in a figurative sense only.
+When we speak of legislation in everyday language, we mean that process
+of parliamentary activity by which Municipal Statutes are called into
+existence. Municipal Legislation presupposes a sovereign power, which
+prescribes rules of conduct to its subjects. It is obvious that within
+the Community of States no such kind of legislation can take place.
+Rules of conduct for the members of the League of Nations can only be
+created by an agreement amongst those members. Whereas Municipal
+Statutes contain the rules of conduct set by an authority sovereign over
+its subjects, International Statutes--if I may be allowed to use that
+term--contain rules of conduct which the members of the Community of
+States have agreed to set for themselves. International Statutes are
+created by the so-called Law-making Treaties of the Powers. But in one
+point Municipal Legislation and the Law-making Treaties of the Powers
+resemble one another very closely:--both intend to create law, and for
+this reason it is permissible to use the term 'International
+Legislation' figuratively for the conclusion of such international
+treaties as contain rules of International Law.
+
+Now it would be very misleading to believe that no International
+Legislation has taken place in the past. The fact is that, from the
+Vienna Congress of 1815 onwards, agreements have been arrived at upon a
+number of rules of International Law. However, such agreements have only
+occurred occasionally, because the Community of civilised States has not
+hitherto possessed a permanently established organ for legislating. Much
+of the legislation which has taken place in the past was only a
+by-product of Congresses or Conferences which had assembled for other
+purposes. On the other hand, when legislation on a certain subject was
+considered pressing, a Congress or Conference was convened for that
+very purpose. It will be only when the Hague Peace Conferences have
+become permanently established that an organ of the League of Nations
+for legislating internationally will be at hand. And a wide field is
+open for such legislation. The bulk of International Law in its present
+state is--if I may say so--a book law, it is customary law which is only
+to be found in text-books of International Law; it is, as regards many
+points, controversial; it has many gaps; and it is in many ways
+uncertain. International Legislation will be able gradually to create
+international statutes which will turn this book law into firm, clear,
+and authoritative statutory law.
+
+XI. But you must not imagine that International Legislation is an easy
+matter. It is in fact full of difficulties of all kinds. I will only
+mention four:
+
+There is, firstly, the language question. Since it is impossible to
+draft International Statutes in all languages, it is absolutely
+necessary to agree upon one language, and this language at present is,
+as you all know, French. Yet, difficult as the language question is, it
+is not insurmountable. It is hardly greater than the difficulty which
+arises when two States, which speak different languages, have to agree
+upon an ordinary convention. One point, however, must be specially
+observed, and that is: when any question of the interpretation of an
+International Statute occurs, it is the French text of the statute which
+is authoritative, and not the text of the translation into other
+languages.
+
+XII. Another difficulty with regard to International Legislation is the
+conflicting _national_ interests of the different States. As
+International Statutes are only possible when the several States come to
+an agreement, it will often not be possible to legislate internationally
+on a given matter, because the interests of the different States will be
+so conflicting that an agreement cannot be arrived at. On the other
+hand, as time goes on the international interests of the several States
+frequently become so powerful that these Governments are quite ready to
+brush aside their particular interests, and to agree upon a compromise
+which makes International Legislation concerning the matter in question
+possible.
+
+XIII. A third difficulty with regard to International Legislation is of
+quite a particular kind. It arises from the fact that International
+Statutes cannot be created by a vote of the majority of States, but only
+by a unanimous vote of all the members of the Community of civilised
+States.
+
+This difficulty, however, can be overcome by dropping the contention
+that no legislation of any kind can be proceeded with unless every
+member of the League of Nations agrees to it. It is a well-known fact
+that a distinction has to be made between _universal_ International Law,
+that is, rules to which every civilised State agrees, and _general_
+International Law, that is, rules to which only the greater number of
+States agree. Now it is quite certain that no universal International
+Law can be created by legislation to which not every member of the
+League of Nations has agreed. Nothing, however, ought to prevent those
+States which are ready to agree to certain new rules of International
+Law, from legislating _for their own number_ on a certain matter. If
+such legislation is really of value, the time will come when the
+dissenting States will gradually accede. The Second Hague Peace
+Conference acted on this principle, for a good many of its Conventions
+were only agreed upon by the greater number, and not by all, of the
+participating States.
+
+XIV. A fourth difficulty with regard to International Legislation is the
+difficulty of the interpretation of, and the construction to be put
+upon, International Statutes as well as ordinary international
+conventions. We do not as yet possess universally recognised rules of
+International Law concerning such interpretation and construction. Each
+nation applies to International Statutes those rules of interpretation
+and construction which are valid for the interpretation and construction
+of their Municipal Statutes.
+
+Many international disputes have been due in the past to this difficulty
+of interpretation and construction. A notorious example is that of the
+interpretation of Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations of 1907
+concerning Land Warfare, which lays down the rule that it is forbidden
+'to declare abolished, suspended, or inadmissible in a Court of Law the
+rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party.'
+
+Germany and other continental States interpret this article to mean that
+the Municipal Law of a State is not allowed to declare that the
+outbreak of war suspends or avoids contracts with alien enemies, or
+that war prevents alien enemies from bringing an action in the Courts.
+
+On the other hand, England and the United States of America interpret
+this article to mean merely that the _occupant of enemy territory_ is
+prohibited from declaring abolished, suspended, or inadmissible in a
+Court of Law the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile
+party.
+
+What is the cause of this divergent interpretation of an article, the
+literal meaning of which seems to be quite clear? The divergence is due
+to the different mode of interpretation of statutes resorted to by
+continental Courts, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, by British
+and American Courts.
+
+Continental Courts take into consideration not only the literal meaning
+of a clause of a statute, but also the intention of the legislator as
+evidenced by--what I should like to call--the history of the clause.
+They look for the intention of the draftsman, they search the
+Parliamentary proceedings concerning the clause, and they interpret and
+construe the clause with regard to the intention of the draftsman as
+well as to the proceedings in Parliament.
+
+Now Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations was inserted on the motion of
+the German delegates to the Second Hague Peace Conference, and there is
+no doubt that the German delegates intended by its insertion to prevent
+the Municipal Law of belligerents from possessing a rule according to
+which the outbreak of war suspends or avoids contracts with alien
+enemies, and prohibits alien enemies from bringing an action in the
+Courts. It is for this reason that Germany and other continental States
+interpret Article 23(h) according to the intention of the German
+delegates.
+
+On the other hand, in interpreting and construing a clause of a statute,
+British and American Courts refuse to take into consideration the
+intention of the draftsman, Parliamentary discussions concerning the
+clause, and the like. They only take into consideration the literal
+meaning of the clause as it stands in the statute of which it is a part.
+Now Article 23(h) is a clause in the Convention concerning the Laws and
+Customs of War on Land. It is one of several paragraphs of Article 23
+which comprises the prohibition of a number of acts by the armed forces
+of belligerents in warfare on land, such as the employment of poison or
+poisoned arms, and the like. The British and American delegates,
+believing that it only concerned an act on the part of belligerent
+forces occupying enemy territory, therefore consented to the insertion
+of Article 23(h), and our Court of Appeal--in the case of Porter _v._
+Freundenberg (1915)--held that Article 23(h) is to be interpreted in
+that sense.[1]
+
+Be that as it may, the difficulty of interpretation and construction of
+international treaties will exist so long as no International Statute
+has been agreed upon which lays down detailed rules concerning
+interpretation and construction, or so long as International Courts have
+not developed such rules in practice. But the problem of International
+Courts is itself a very difficult one; it will be the subject of my
+third lecture which will deal with Administration of Justice and
+Mediation within the League of Nations.
+
+[1] By a letter of February 28, 1911, I drew the attention of the
+Foreign Office to the interpretation of Article 23(h) which generally
+prevailed on the Continent. This letter and the answer I received were
+privately printed, and copies were distributed amongst those members and
+associates of the Institute of International Law who attended the
+meeting at Madrid. Since French, German, and Italian International Law
+Journals published translations, but the original of the correspondence
+was never published in this country, I think it advisable to append it
+to this lecture.
+
+
+APPENDIX
+
+CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE FOREIGN OFFICE RESPECTING THE INTERPRETATION OF
+ARTICLE 23(h) OF THE HAGUE REGULATIONS CONCERNING LAND WARFARE
+
+
+LETTER FROM THE PRESENT WRITER TO THE FOREIGN OFFICE.
+
+                                          WHEWELL HOUSE, CAMBRIDGE,
+                                                  _28th February, 1911_.
+
+ TO
+ THE UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE
+     FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS.
+
+SIR,--
+
+I venture to bring the following matter before your consideration:--
+
+In the course of my recent studies I have been dealing with the laws and
+usages of war on land, and I have had to consider the interpretation of
+Article 23(h) of the Regulations attached to the Convention of 1907
+relating to the Laws and Customs of war on land. I find that the
+interpretation prevailing among all continental and some English and
+American authorities is contrary to the old English rule, and I would
+respectfully ask to be informed of the view which His Majesty's
+Government place upon the article in question.
+
+To give some idea as to how an interpretation of Article 23(h) contrary
+to the old English rule prevails generally, I will quote a number of
+French, German, English, and American writers, the works of whom I have
+at hand in my library, and I will also quote the German _Weissbuch_
+concerning the results of the second Hague Conference of 1907.
+
+Bonfils, _Manuel de droit international public_, 5th ed. by Fauchille,
+1908, discusses, on page 651, the doctrine which denies to an enemy
+subject any _persona standi in judicio_, but adds:--'... Article 23(h)
+décide qu'il est interdit de déclarer éteints, suspendus ou non
+recevables en justice, les droits et actions des nationaux de la partie
+adverse.'
+
+Politis, Professor of International Law in the University of Poitiers
+(France), in his report to the Institute of International Law, Session
+of Paris (1910), concerning _Effets de la Guerre sur les Obligations
+Internationales et les Contrats privés_, page 18, says:
+
+'Un point hors de doute, c'est, que la guerre ne peut, ni par elle-même
+ni par la volonté des belligérants, affecter la validité ou l'exécution
+des contrats antérieurs. Cette règle fait désormais partie du droit
+positif. L'article 23(h) du nouveau Règlement de la Haye interdit
+formellement aux belligérants "de déclarer éteints, suspendus ou non
+recevables en justice les droits et actions des nationaux de la partie
+adverse."
+
+'Cette formule condamne d'anciens usages conservés encore, en partie,
+dans certains pays. Elle proscrit d'abord tous les moyens--annulation ou
+confiscation--par lesquels on chercherait à atteindre, dans leur
+existence, les droits nés avant la guerre. Elle exclut, en second lieu,
+l'ancienne pratique qui interdisait aux particuliers ennemis l'accès des
+tribunaux. Elle prohibe, enfin, toutes les mesures législatives ou
+autres tendant à entraver au cours de la guerre l'exécution ou les
+effets utiles des obligations privées, notamment le cours des intérêts.
+
+'Il y a là progrès incontestable. Et l'on doit être reconnaissant à la
+délégation allemande à la 2e Conférence de la paix de l'avoir provoqué.
+
+'L'accueil empressé et unanime qu'a reçu cette heureuse initiative
+permet d'espérer que de nouveaux progrès pourront être réalisés dans cet
+ordre d'idées.
+
+'On doit souhaiter que la disposition de l'article 23(h), étrangère à
+l'hypothèse de l'occupation du territoire ennemi, soit distraite du
+règlement de 1907 (comme les articles 57 à 60 l'ont été du Règlement de
+1899) pour être mieux placée dans une convention nouvelle, où d'autres
+textes viendraient la compléter.'
+
+Ullmann, _Völkerrecht_, 2nd ed. 1908, p. 474, says:--
+
+'Auch der Rechtsverkehr wird durch den Ausbruch des Krieges nicht
+unterbrochen oder gehemmt. Die nach Landesrecht frueher uebliche
+zeitweise Aufhebung der Klagbarkeit vom Schuldverbindlichkeiten des
+Staates oder eines Angehörigen gegen Angehörige des Feindes ist durch
+Artikel 23(h) untersagt.'
+
+Wehberg, _Das Beuterecht im Land- und Seekriege_, 1909, pp. 5 and 6
+says:--
+
+'Article 46 Absatz 2 bestimmt:--"Das Privateigentum darf nicht
+eingezogen werden." In konsequenter Durchführung dieses Satzes bestimmt
+der auf deutschen Antrag 1907 hinzugefügte Article 23(h):--"Untersagt
+ist die Aufhebung oder zeitweilige Ausserkraftsetzung der Rechte und
+Forderungen von Angehoerigen der Gegenpartei oder der Ausschliessung
+ihrer Klagbarkeit."'
+
+Whittuck, _International Documents_, London 1908, Introduction p. xxvii,
+says--'In Article 23(h) it is prohibited to declare abolished, suspended
+or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the
+nationals of the other belligerent which is a development of the
+principle that the private property of the subjects of a belligerent is
+not subject to confiscation. This new prohibition if accepted by this
+country would necessitate some changes in our municipal law.'
+
+Holland, _The Laws of War on Land_, 1908, says on p. 5 that:--'Article
+23(h) seems to require the Signatory Powers to the convention concerned
+to legislate for the abolition of an enemy's disability to sustain a
+_persona standi in judicio_.' (See also Holland, _loco citato_, p. 44,
+where he expresses his doubts concerning the interpretation of Article
+23(h).)
+
+Bordwell, _The Law of War between Belligerents_, Chicago 1908,
+recognises on page 210 the fact that according to Article 23(h) an alien
+enemy must now be allowed to sue in the courts of a belligerent, and
+
+Gregory, Professor in the University of Iowa, who reviews Bordwell's
+work in the _American Journal of International Law_, Volume 3 (1909),
+page 788, takes up the same standpoint.
+
+The only author who interprets Article 23(h) in a different way is
+General Davis, who in his _Elements of International Law_, 3rd edition
+1908, page 578, note 1, says:--
+
+'It is more than probable that this humane and commendable purpose would
+fail of accomplishment if a military commander conceived it to be within
+his authority to suspend or nullify their operation, or to regard their
+application in certain cases as a matter falling within his
+administrative discretion. Especially is this true where a military
+officer refuses to receive well grounded complaints, or declines to
+receive demands for redress, in respect to the acts or conduct of the
+troops under his command, from persons subject to the jurisdiction of
+the enemy who find themselves, for the time being, in the territory
+which he holds in military occupation. To provide against such a
+contingency it was deemed wise to add an appropriate declaratory clause
+to the prohibition of Article 23.'
+
+It is very unfortunate that the book of General Davis is not at all
+known on the Continent, and that therefore none of the continental
+authors have any knowledge of the fact that a divergent interpretation
+from their own of Article 23(h) is being preferred by an American
+author.
+
+It is likewise very unfortunate that neither the English Bluebook on the
+Second Hague Peace Conference (see Parliamentary Papers, Miscellaneous
+No. 4, 1907, page 104) nor the official minutes of the proceedings of
+the Conference, edited by the Dutch Government, give any such
+information concerning the construction of Article 23(h) as could assist
+a jurist in forming an opinion regarding the correct interpretation.
+
+It is, however, of importance to take notice of the fact that Article
+23(h) is an addition to Article 23 which was made on the proposition of
+Germany, and that Germany prefers an interpretation of Article 23(h)
+which would seem to coincide with the interpretation preferred by all
+the continental writers. This becomes clearly apparent from the German
+_Weissbuch ueber die Ergebnisse der im Jahre 1907 in Haag abgehaltenen
+Friedensconferenz_, which contains on page 7 the following:--
+
+'Der Artikel 23 hat gleichfalls auf deutschen Antrag zwei wichtige
+Zusätze erhalten. Durch den ersten wird der Grundsatz der
+Unverletzlichkeit des Privateigenthumes auch auf dem Gebiete der
+Forderungsrechte anerkannt. Nach der Gesetzgebung einzelner Staaten soll
+nämlich der Krieg die Folge haben, dass die Schuldverbindlichkeiten des
+Staates oder seiner Angehörigen gegen Angehörige des Feindes aufgehoben
+oder zeitweilig ausser Kraft gesetzt oder wenigstens von der
+Klagbarkeit ausgeschlossen werden. Solche Vorschriften werden nun durch
+den Artikel 23 Abs. 1 unter h für unzulässig erklärt.'
+
+However this may be, the details given above show sufficiently that a
+divergent interpretation of Article 23(h) from the old English rule is
+prevalent on the Continent, and is to some extent also accepted by
+English and American Authorities, and it is for this reason that I would
+ask whether His Majesty's Government consider that the old English rule
+is no longer in force.
+
+                                        I have, &c.,
+
+                                             (Signed) L. OPPENHEIM.
+
+
+LETTER FROM THE FOREIGN OFFICE TO THE PRESENT WRITER.
+
+                                                    FOREIGN OFFICE,
+                                                       _March 27, 1911_.
+
+SIR,--
+
+I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to thank you for your letter of
+February 28th, and for drawing his attention to the misconceptions which
+appear to prevail so largely among the continental writers on
+international law with regard to the purport and effect of Article 23(h)
+of the Convention of October 18th, 1907, respecting the laws and customs
+of war on land.
+
+It seems very strange that jurists of the standing of those from whose
+writings you quote could have attributed to the article in question the
+meaning and effect they have given it if they had studied the general
+scheme of the instrument in which it finds a place.
+
+The provision is inserted at the end of an article dealing with the
+prohibited modes of warfare. It forms part of Chapter I. of Section II.
+of the Regulations annexed to the Convention. The title of Chapter I. is
+'Means of injuring the enemy, sieges and bombardment': and if the
+article itself is examined it will be seen to deal with such matters as
+employing poison or poisoned weapons, refusing quarter, use of treachery
+and the unnecessary destruction of private property. Similarly the
+following articles (24 to 28) all deal with the restrictions which the
+nations felt it incumbent upon them from a sense of humanity to place
+upon the conduct of their armed forces in the actual prosecution of
+military operations.
+
+The Regulation in which these articles figure is itself merely an annex
+to the Convention which alone forms the contractual obligation between
+the parties, and the engagement which the parties to the Convention have
+undertaken is (Article 1) to 'issue instructions to their armed land
+forces in conformity with the Regulations respecting the Law and Customs
+of war on land.'
+
+This makes it abundantly clear that the purpose and scope of the
+Regulations is limited to the proceedings of the armies in the field;
+those armies are under the orders of the commanders, and the Governments
+are bound to issue instructions to those commanders to act in accordance
+with the Regulations. That is all. There is nothing in the Convention or
+in the Regulations dealing with the rights or the status of the
+non-combatant individuals, whether of enemy nationality or domiciled in
+enemy territory. They are, of course, if inhabitants of the theatre of
+war, affected by the provisions of the Regulations because they are
+individuals who are affected by the military operations, and in a sense
+a regulation which forbids a military commander from poisoning a well
+gives a non-combatant inhabitant a right or a quasi-right not to have
+his well poisoned, but his rights against his neighbours, his relations
+with private individuals, whether of his own or of enemy nationality,
+remain untouched by this series of rules for the conduct of warfare on
+land.
+
+Turning now to the actual wording of Article 23(h) it will be seen that
+it begins with the wording 'to declare.' It is particularly forbidden
+'to _declare_ abolished, &c.' This wording necessarily contemplates the
+issue of some proclamation or notification purporting to abrogate or to
+change rights previously existing and which would otherwise have
+continued to exist, and in view of Article I of the Convention this
+hypothetical proclamation must have been one which it was assumed the
+commander of the army would issue; consequently, stated broadly, the
+effect of Article 23(h) is that a commander in the field is forbidden to
+attempt to terrorise the inhabitants of the theatre of war by depriving
+them of existing opportunities of obtaining relief to which they are
+entitled in respect of private claims.
+
+Sir E. Grey is much obliged to you for calling his attention to the
+extract which you quote from the German White Book. This extract may be
+translated as follows:--'Article 23 has also received on German
+proposal two weighty additions. By the first the fundamental principle
+of the inviolability of private property in the domain of legal claims
+is recognised. According to the legislation of individual states, war
+has the result of extinguishing or temporarily suspending, or at least
+of suppressing the liability of the state or its nationals to be sued by
+nationals of the enemy. These prescriptions have now been declared
+inadmissible by Article 23(h).'
+
+The original form of the addition to Article 23 which the German
+delegates proposed was as follows: 'de déclarer éteintes, suspendues ou
+non recevables les réclamations privées de ressortissants de la Partie
+adverse' (see procès-verbal of the 2nd meeting of the 1st sub-Committee
+of the 2nd Committee, 10th July, 1907).
+
+There is nothing to show that any explanation was vouchsafed to the
+effect that the proposed addition to the article was intended to mean
+more than its wording necessarily implied, though there is a statement
+by one of the German delegates in the procès-verbal of the 1st meeting
+of the 1st sub-Committee of the 2nd Committee, on July 3rd, which in all
+probability must have referred to this particular amendment, though the
+procès-verbal does not render it at all clear; nor is the statement
+itself free from ambiguity. An amendment was suggested and accepted at
+the second meeting to add the words 'en justice' after 'non recevables,'
+and in this form the sub-article was considered by an examining
+committee, was accepted and incorporated in Article 23, and brought
+before and accepted by the Conference in its 4th Plenary Sitting on the
+17th August, 1907.
+
+The subsequent alteration in the wording must have been made by the
+Drafting Committee, but cannot have been considered to affect the
+substance of the provision, as in the 10th Plenary Sitting on October
+17th, 1907, the reporter of the Drafting Committee, in dealing with the
+verbal amendments made in this Convention, merely said, 'En ce qui
+concerne le règlement lui-même, je n'appellerai pas votre attention sur
+les différentes modifications de style sans importance que nous y avons
+introduites.'
+
+Nor is there anything to indicate any such far-reaching interpretation
+as the German White Book suggests in the report which accompanied the
+draft text of the Convention when it was brought before the Plenary
+Sitting of the Conference (Annex A. to 4th Plenary Sitting). It merely
+states that the addition is regarded as embodying in very happy terms a
+consequence of the principles accepted in 1899.
+
+The result appears to Sir E. Grey to be that neither the wording nor the
+context nor the circumstances attending the introduction of the
+provision which now figures as Article 23(h) support the interpretation
+which the writers you quote place upon it and which the German White
+Book endorses.
+
+Sir E. Grey notices that, in the extract you quote, Monsieur Politis,
+after placing his own interpretation upon the article, remarks that it
+is quite foreign to the hypothesis of the occupation of territory and
+ought to be removed from the Regulations and turned into a Convention by
+itself. If this interpretation were correct, this remark of Monsieur
+Politis is certainly true: but the fact that the provision appears where
+it does should have suggested to Monsieur Politis that it does not bear
+the interpretation he puts upon it.
+
+Nor does it appear to Sir E. Grey that the provision conflicts with the
+principle of the English common law that an enemy subject is not
+entitled to bring an action in the courts to sustain a contract,
+commerce with enemy subjects being illegal.
+
+That principle operates automatically on the outbreak of war, it
+requires no declaration by the Government, still less by a commander in
+the field, to bring it into operation. It is a principle which applies
+equally whether the war is being waged on land or sea, and which is
+applied in all the courts and not merely in those within the field of
+the operations of the military commanders.
+
+The whole question of the effect of war upon the commerce of private
+persons may require reconsideration in the future; the old rules may be
+scarcely consistent with the requirements or the conditions of modern
+commerce; but a modification of those rules is not one to which His
+Majesty's Government could be a party except after careful enquiry and
+consideration, and, when made at all, it must be done by a convention
+that applies to war both on land and sea.
+
+They certainly have not become parties to any such modification by
+agreeing to a convention which relates only to the instructions they are
+to give the commanders of their armed forces, and which is limited to
+war on land.
+
+                                        I am, &c.,
+
+                                             (Signed) F. A. CAMPBELL.
+
+
+
+
+THIRD LECTURE
+
+ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND MEDIATION WITHIN THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+
+    I. Administration of Justice within the League is a question of
+    International Courts, but it is incorrect to assert that
+    International Legislation necessitates the existence of
+    International Courts.
+
+    II. The Permanent Court of Arbitration created by the First Hague
+    Peace Conference.
+
+    III. The difficulties connected with International Administration of
+    Justice by International Courts.
+
+    IV. The necessity for a Court of Appeal above the International
+    Court of First Instance.
+
+    V. The difficulties connected with the setting up of International
+    Courts of Justice.
+
+    VI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself because it
+    distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several Benches
+    which would be called upon to decide the cases.
+
+    VII. The advantages of the recommended scheme.
+
+    VIII. A necessary provision for so-called complex cases of dispute.
+
+    IX. A necessary provision with regard to the notorious clause _rebus
+    sic stantibus_.
+
+    X. The two starting points for a satisfactory proposal concerning
+    International Mediation by International Councils of Conciliation.
+    Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning Pacific Settlement of
+    International disputes. The Permanent International Commissions of
+    the Bryan Peace Treaties.
+
+    XI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself for the
+    establishment of International Councils of Conciliation.
+
+    XII. The question of disarmament.
+
+    XIII. The assertion that States renounce their sovereignty by
+    entering into the League.
+
+    XIV. Conclusion: Can it be expected that, in case of a great
+    conflict of interests, all the members of the League will faithfully
+    carry out their engagements?
+
+
+THE LECTURE
+
+I. My last lecture dealt with the organisation of a League of Nations
+and International Legislation by the League. To-day I want to draw your
+attention to International Administration of Justice and International
+Mediation within the League.
+
+I begin with International Administration of Justice which, of course,
+is a question of International Courts of Justice. Hitherto, although
+International Legislation has been to some extent in existence, no
+International Courts have been established before which States in
+dispute have been compelled to appear. Now there is no doubt that
+International Legislation loses in value if there are no arrangements
+for International Administration of Justice by independent and permanent
+International Courts. Yet it is incorrect to assert, although it is
+frequently done, that one may not speak of legislation and a law created
+by legislation without the existence of Courts to administer such law.
+
+Why is this assertion incorrect? Because the function of Courts is to
+decide _controversial_ questions of law or of fact in case the
+respective parties cannot agree concerning them. However, in most cases
+the law is not in jeopardy, and its commands are carried out by those
+concerned without any necessity for a Court to declare the law. Modern
+International Law has been in existence for several hundred years, and
+its commands have in most cases been complied with in the absence of
+International Courts. On the other hand, there is no doubt that, if
+controversies arise about a question of law or a question of fact, the
+authority of the law can be successfully vindicated only by the verdict
+of a Court. And it is for this reason that no highly developed Community
+can exist for long without Courts of Justice.
+
+II. The Community of civilised States did not, until the end of the
+nineteenth century, possess any permanent institution which made the
+administration of international justice possible. When States were in
+conflict and, instead of having recourse to arms, resolved to have the
+dispute peaceably settled by an award, in every case they agreed upon
+so-called arbitration, and they nominated one or more arbitrators, whom
+they asked to give a verdict. For this reason, it was an epoch-making
+step forward when the First Peace Conference of 1899 agreed upon the
+institution of a Permanent Court of Arbitration, and a code of rules for
+the procedure before this Court. Although the term 'Permanent Court of
+Arbitration,' as applied to the institution established by the First
+Hague Peace Conference, is only a euphemism, since actually the Court
+concerned is not a permanent one and the members of the Court have in
+every case to be nominated by the parties, there is in existence,
+firstly, a permanent panel of persons from which the arbitrators may be
+selected; secondly, a permanent office at the Hague; and, thirdly, a
+code of procedure before the Court. Thereby an institution has been
+established which is always at hand in case the parties in conflict
+want to make use of it; whereas in former times parties in conflict had
+to negotiate a long time in order to set up the machinery for
+arbitration. And the short time of twenty years has fully justified the
+expectations aroused by the institution of the Permanent Court of
+Arbitration, for a good number of cases have been brought before it and
+settled to the satisfaction of the parties concerned.
+
+And the Second Hague Peace Conference of 1907 contemplated further steps
+by agreeing upon a treaty concerning the establishment of an
+International Court of Appeal in Prize Cases, and upon a draft treaty
+concerning a really Permanent International Court of Justice side by
+side with the existing Court of Arbitration. Although neither of these
+contemplated International Courts has been established, there is no
+doubt that, if after the present war a League of Nations becomes a
+reality, one or more International Courts of Justice will surely be
+established, although the existing Permanent Court of Arbitration may
+remain in being.
+
+III. But just as regards International Legislation, I must warn you not
+to imagine that International Administration of Justice by International
+Courts is an easy matter. It is in fact full of difficulties of many
+kinds.
+
+The peculiar character of International Law; the rivalry between the
+different schools of international jurists, namely the Naturalists,
+Positivists, and Grotians; the question of language; the peculiarities
+of the systems of law of the different States, of their constitutions,
+and many other difficulties, entail the danger that International Courts
+may become the arena of national jealousies, of empty talk, and of
+political intrigues, instead of being pillars of international justice.
+
+Everything depends upon what principles will guide the States in their
+selection of the individuals whom they appoint as members of
+International Courts. Not diplomatists, not politicians, but only men
+ought to be appointed who have had a training in law in general, and in
+International Law in particular; men who are linguists, knowing, at any
+rate, the French language besides their own; men who possess
+independence of character and are free from national prejudices of every
+kind. There is no doubt that, under present conditions and circumstances
+of international life, the institution of International Courts
+represents an unheard of experiment. There is, however, likewise no
+doubt that _now_ is the time for the experiment to be made, and I
+believe that the experiment will be successful, provided the several
+States are careful in the appointment of the judges.
+
+IV. And it must be emphasised that an International Court of Appeal
+above the one or several International Courts is a necessity. Just as
+Municipal Courts of Justice, so International Courts of Justice are not
+infallible. If the States are to be compelled to have their judicial
+disputes settled by International Administration of Justice, there must
+be a possibility of bringing an appeal from lower International Courts
+to a Higher Court. It is only in this way that in time a body of
+International Case Law can grow up, which will be equivalent in its
+influence upon the practice of the States to the municipal case law of
+the different States.
+
+V. I have hitherto considered in a general way only the difficulties of
+International Administration of Justice; I have not touched upon the
+particular difficulties connected with the setting up and manning of
+International Courts. If the several States could easily agree upon,
+say, five qualified men as judges of a Court of First Instance, and
+upon, say, seven qualified men as judges of a Court of Appeal, there
+would be no difficulty whatever in setting up these two Courts. And
+perhaps some generations hence the time may come when such an agreement
+will be possible. In our time it cannot be expected, and here therefore
+lies the great difficulty in the way of setting up and manning
+International Courts of Justice; because there is no doubt that each
+State will claim the right to appoint at least one man of its own choice
+to sit as judge in the International Court or Courts. And since there
+are about fifty or more civilised independent States in existence, the
+International Court would comprise fifty or more members.
+
+Now why would the several States claim a right to appoint at least one
+man of their own choice as judge? They would do this because they desire
+to have a representative of their own general legal views in the Court.
+It is a well-known fact that not only the legal systems which prevail in
+the several States differ, but also that there are differences
+concerning the fundamental conceptions of justice, law, procedure, and
+evidence. Each State fears that an International Court will create a
+practice fundamentally divergent from its general legal views, unless
+there is at least one representative of its own general legal views
+sitting in the Court.
+
+I think that in spite of everything the difficulty is not insurmountable
+provided a scheme for an International Court which follows closely the
+model of Municipal Courts is not insisted upon. Just as the organisation
+of a League of Nations cannot follow the model of the organisation of a
+State, so the attempt to set up an International Court must not aim at
+following closely the model of Municipal Courts. What is required is an
+institution which secures the settlement of judicial international
+disputes by giving judgments on the basis of law. I think this demand
+can be satisfied by a scheme which would meet both the claim of each
+State to nominate one judge and the necessity not to overcrowd the Bench
+which decides each dispute.
+
+VI. The scheme which I should like to recommend is one which
+distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several Benches which
+would be called upon to decide the several cases. It is as follows:
+
+The Court as a whole to consist of as many judges as there are members
+of the League, each member to appoint one judge and one deputy judge who
+would take the place of the judge in case of illness or death or other
+cause of absence. The President, the Vice-President, and, say, twelve or
+fourteen members to constitute the Permanent Bench of the Court and
+therefore to be resident the whole year round at the Hague. Half of the
+members of this Permanent Bench of the Court to be appointed by the
+Great Powers--each Great Power to appoint one--and the other half of the
+members to be appointed by the minor Powers. Perhaps the Scandinavian
+Powers might agree upon the nomination of one member; Holland and Spain
+and Portugal upon another; Belgium, Switzerland, and Luxemburg upon a
+third; the Balkan States upon a fourth; Argentina, Brazil, and Chile
+upon a fifth; and so on. Anyhow, some arrangement would have to be made
+according to which the minor Powers unite upon the appointment of half
+the number of the Permanent Bench.
+
+If a judicial dispute arises between two States, the case to go in the
+first instance before a Bench comprising the two judges appointed by the
+two States in dispute and a President who, as each case arises, is to be
+selected by the Permanent Bench of the Court from the members of this
+Bench. This Court of First Instance having given its judgment, each
+party to have a right of appeal. The appeal to go before the Permanent
+Bench at the Hague, which is to give judgment with a quorum of six
+judges with the addition of those judges who served as the Bench of
+First Instance. The right of appeal to exist only on questions of law
+and not on questions of fact.
+
+Decisions of the Appeal Court to be binding precedents for itself and
+for any Courts of First Instance. But should the Appeal Court desire to
+go back on a former decision of law, this to be possible only at a
+meeting of the Court comprising at least twelve members of the Permanent
+Bench.
+
+VII. The proposal which I have just sketched, and which will need to be
+worked out in detail if it is to be realised, offers the following
+advantages:
+
+Every case would in the first instance be decided by a small Bench which
+would enjoy the confidence of both parties because they would have their
+own judge in the Court. This point is of particular importance with
+regard to the mode of taking evidence and making clear the facts; but is
+likewise of importance on account of the divergence of fundamental legal
+views and the like.
+
+Since the Court of Appeal would only decide points of law, the facts as
+elucidated by the Bench of First Instance would remain settled. But the
+existence of the Court of Appeal would enable the parties to re-argue
+questions of law with all details. The fact that six of the Bench which
+serves as a Court of Appeal are members of the Permanent Bench would
+guarantee a thorough reconsideration of the points of law concerned, and
+likewise the maintenance and sequence of tradition in International
+Administration of Justice.
+
+Again, the fact that the Court of Appeal is to comprise, besides six
+members of the Permanent Bench, those three judges who sat as the Bench
+of First Instance would guarantee that the judges appointed by the
+States in dispute could again bring into play any particular views of
+law they may hold.
+
+VIII. This is the outline of my scheme for the establishment and manning
+of the International Court of Justice. But before I leave the subject, I
+must say a few words concerning two important points which almost all
+other schemes for the establishment of an International Court overlook.
+Firstly, the necessity to make provision for what I should like to call
+complex cases of dispute; namely, cases which are justiciable but in
+which, besides the question of law, there is at the same time involved a
+vital political principle or claim. Take the case of a South American
+State entering into an agreement with a non-American State to lease to
+it a coaling station: this case is justiciable, but besides the question
+of law there is a political claim involved in it, namely, the Monroe
+doctrine of the United States. Unless provision be made for the
+settlement of such complex cases, the League of Nations will not be a
+success, for it might well happen that a case touches vital political
+interests in such a way as not to permit a State to have it settled by a
+mere juristic decision.
+
+Now my proposal to meet such complex cases is that when a party objects
+to a settlement of a case on mere juristic principles, although the
+other party maintains that it is a justiciable case, the Bench which is
+to serve as Bench of First Instance shall investigate the matter with
+regard to the question whether the case is more political than legal in
+nature. If the Court decides the question in the negative, then the same
+Court shall give judgment on the dispute; but, if the Court decides the
+question in the affirmative, then the case shall be referred by the
+Court to the International Council of Conciliation. Whatever the
+decision of the Bench of First Instance may be, each party shall have
+the right of appeal to the Permanent Bench which serves as the Court of
+Appeal.
+
+IX. The other point which I desire to mention before I leave the subject
+of International Administration of Justice concerns the notorious
+principle _conventio omnis intelligitur rebus sic stantibus_. You know
+that almost all publicists and also almost all Governments assert the
+existence of a customary rule according to which a vital change of
+circumstances after ratification of a treaty may be of such a kind as to
+justify a party in demanding to be released either from the whole treaty
+or from certain obligations stipulated in it. But the meaning of the
+term 'vital change of circumstances' is elastic, and there is therefore
+great danger that the principle _conventio omnis intelligitur rebus sic
+stantibus_ will be abused for the purpose of hiding the violation of
+treaties behind the shield of law. This danger will remain so long as
+there is no International Court in existence which, on the motion of one
+of the contracting parties, could set aside the treaty obligation whose
+fulfilment has become so oppressive that in justice the obliged party
+might ask to be released. Now, as the League of Nations is to set up an
+International Court of Justice, my proposal is that the Court should be
+declared competent to give judgment on the claim of a party to a treaty
+to be released from its obligations on account of vital change of
+circumstances. Of course the case would go before that Bench of the
+Court which is to serve as the Court of First Instance, and an appeal
+would lie to the Permanent Bench which serves as the Court of Appeal.
+
+X. Having given you the outlines of a scheme concerning International
+Administration of Justice, I now turn to International Mediation by
+International Councils of Conciliation.
+
+For a satisfactory proposal concerning International Councils of
+Conciliation two starting points offer themselves. One starting point is
+the special form of mediation recommended by Article 8 of the Hague
+Convention concerning the pacific settlement of international disputes.
+The following is the text of this Article 8:
+
+    'The Signatory Powers are agreed in recommending the application,
+    when circumstances allow, of special mediation in the following
+    form:--
+
+    'In case of a serious difference endangering peace, the contending
+    States choose respectively a Power, to which they intrust the
+    mission of entering into direct communication with the Power chosen
+    on the other side, with the object of preventing the rupture of
+    pacific relations.
+
+    'For the period of this mandate, the term of which, in default of
+    agreement to the contrary, cannot exceed thirty days, the States at
+    variance cease from all direct communication on the subject of the
+    dispute, which is regarded as referred exclusively to the mediating
+    Powers. These Powers shall use their best efforts to settle the
+    dispute.
+
+    'In case of a definite rupture of pacific relations, these Powers
+    remain jointly charged with the task of taking advantage of any
+    opportunity to restore peace.'
+
+The second starting point is supplied by the Permanent International
+Commissions of the so-called Bryan Peace Treaties concluded in 1913-14
+by the United States of America with a number of other States. These
+peace treaties are not in every point identical, but of interest to us
+here are the clauses according to which Permanent International
+Commissions are set up to serve as Councils of Conciliation. The
+following is the text of the three articles concerned of the treaty
+between the United States and Great Britain of September 15, 1914:
+
+    Art. I. 'The High Contracting Parties agree that all disputes
+    between them, of every nature whatsoever, other than disputes the
+    settlement of which is provided for and in fact achieved under
+    existing agreements between the High Contracting Parties, shall,
+    when diplomatic methods of adjustment have failed, be referred for
+    investigation and report to a permanent International Commission, to
+    be constituted in the manner prescribed in the next succeeding
+    article; and they agree not to declare war or begin hostilities
+    during such investigation and before the report is submitted.'
+
+    Art. II. 'The International Commission shall be composed of five
+    members, to be appointed as follows: One member shall be chosen from
+    each country, by the Government thereof; one member shall be chosen
+    by each Government from some third country; the fifth member shall
+    be chosen by common agreement between the two Governments, it being
+    understood that he shall not be a citizen of either country. The
+    expenses of the Commission shall be paid by the two Governments in
+    equal proportions.'
+
+    'The International Commission shall be appointed within six months
+    after the exchange of the ratifications of this treaty; and
+    vacancies shall be filled according to the manner of the original
+    appointment.'
+
+    Art. III. 'In case the High Contracting Parties shall have failed to
+    adjust a dispute by diplomatic methods, they shall at once refer it
+    to the International Commission for investigation and report. The
+    International Commission may, however, spontaneously by unanimous
+    agreement offer its services to that effect, and in such case it
+    shall notify both Governments and request their co-operation in the
+    investigation.'
+
+Keeping in view the special form of mediation recommended by Article 8
+of the Hague Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of
+International Disputes and the stipulations of the Bryan Peace Treaties
+concerning Permanent International Commissions, we can reach a
+satisfactory solution of the problem of International Mediation if we
+take into consideration the two reasons why a League of Nations must
+stipulate the compulsion of its members to bring non-justiciable
+disputes before a Council of Conciliation previous to resorting to
+hostilities. These reasons are, firstly, that war in future shall not be
+declared without a previous attempt to have the dispute peaceably
+settled, and, secondly, that war in future shall not break out like a
+bolt from the blue.
+
+XI. My proposal concerning International Councils of Conciliation is the
+following:
+
+Every member of the League shall appoint for a term of years--say five
+or ten--two conciliators and two deputy conciliators from among their
+own subjects, and one conciliator and one deputy conciliator from among
+the subjects of some other State. Now when a non-justiciable dispute
+arises between two States which has not been settled by diplomatic
+means, the three conciliators of each party in dispute shall meet to
+investigate the matter, to report thereon, and to propose, if possible,
+a settlement.
+
+According to this proposal there would be in existence a number of
+Councils of Conciliation equal to half the number of the members of the
+League. Whenever a dispute arises, the Permanent Council of
+Conciliation--with which I shall deal presently--shall appoint a
+Chairman from amongst its own members. The Council thus constituted
+shall investigate the case, report on it, send a copy to each party in
+dispute and to the Permanent Council of Conciliation.
+
+The _Permanent_ Council of Conciliation should be a _small_ Council to
+be established by each of the Great Powers appointing one conciliator
+and one deputy conciliator for a period of--say--five or ten years. The
+reason why only the Great Powers should be represented in the Permanent
+Council of Conciliation at the Hague is that naturally, in case coercion
+is to be resorted to against a State which begins war without having
+previously submitted the dispute to a Council of Conciliation, the Great
+Powers will be chiefly concerned. This Permanent Council of Conciliation
+would have to watch the political life of the members of the League and
+communicate with all the Governments of the members in case the peace of
+the world were endangered by the attitude of one of the members; for
+instance by one or more of the members arming excessively. The Council
+would likewise be competent to draw the attention of States involved in
+a dispute to the fact that they ought to bring it before either the
+International Court of Justice or their special Council of Conciliation.
+
+This proposal of mine concerning mediation within the League of Nations
+is, of course, sketchy and would need working out in detail if one were
+thinking of preparing a full plan for its realisation. However that may
+be, my proposal concerning a number of Councils of Conciliation has the
+advantage that non-justiciable disputes would in each case be
+investigated and reported on by conciliators who have once for all been
+appointed by the States in dispute and who therefore possess their
+confidence. On the other hand, the proposed Permanent Council of
+Conciliation would guarantee to the Great Powers that important
+influence which is due to them on account of the fact that they would be
+chiefly concerned in case economic, military, or naval measures had to
+be resorted to against a recalcitrant member of the League.
+
+XII. Having discussed International Mediation by International Councils
+of Conciliation, I must now turn to two questions which I have hitherto
+purposely omitted, although in the eyes of many people they stand in the
+forefront of interest, namely, firstly, _disarmament_ as a consequence
+of the peaceable settlement of disputes by an International Court of
+Justice and International Councils of Conciliation, and, secondly, the
+question of the _surrender of sovereignty_ which it is asserted is
+involved by the entrance of any State into the proposed League of
+Nations.
+
+Now as regards disarmament, I have deliberately abstained from
+mentioning it hitherto, although it is certainly a question of the
+greatest importance. The reason for my abstention is a very simple one.
+I have always maintained that disarmament can neither diminish the
+number of wars nor abolish war altogether, but that, if the number of
+wars diminishes or if war be abolished altogether, disarmament will
+follow. There is no doubt that when once the new League of Nations is in
+being, war will occur much more rarely than hitherto. For this reason
+disarmament will _ipso facto_ follow the establishment of a League of
+Nations, and the details of such disarmament are matters which will soon
+be solved when once the new League has become a reality. Yet I must
+emphasise the fact that disarmament is not identical with the total
+abolition of armies and navies. The possibility must always be kept in
+view that one or more members of the League will be recalcitrant, and
+that then the other members must unite their forces against them. And
+there must likewise be kept in view the possibility of a war between two
+members of the League on account of a political dispute in which
+mediation by the International Councils of Conciliation was
+unsuccessful. Be that as it may, it is certain that in time disarmament
+can take place to a very great extent, and it is quite probable that
+large standing armies based on conscription might everywhere be
+abolished and be replaced by militia.
+
+XIII. Let me now turn to the question of sovereignty. Is the assertion
+really true that States renounce their sovereignty by entering into the
+League? The answer depends entirely upon the conception of sovereignty
+with which one starts. If sovereignty were absolutely unfettered liberty
+of action, a loss of sovereignty would certainly be involved by
+membership of the League, because every member submits to the
+obligation never to resort to arms on account of a judicial dispute, and
+in case of a political dispute to resort to arms only after having given
+an opportunity of mediation to an International Council of Conciliation.
+But in fact sovereignty does not mean absolutely boundless liberty of
+action; and moreover sovereignty has at no time been a conception upon
+the contents of which there has been general agreement.
+
+The term 'sovereignty' was introduced into political science by Bodin in
+his celebrated work 'De la République,' which appeared in 1577. Before
+that time, the word _souverain_ was used in France for any political or
+other authority which was not subordinate to any higher authority; for
+instance, the highest Courts were called _cours souveraines_. Now Bodin
+gave quite a new meaning to the old term. Being under the influence and
+in favour of the policy of centralisation initiated by Louis XI of
+France (1461-1483), the founder of French absolutism, Bodin defines
+sovereignty as the 'absolute and perpetual power within a State.'
+However, even Bodin was far from considering sovereignty to give
+absolutely unfettered freedom of action, for he conceded that
+sovereignty was restricted by the commandments of God and by the rules
+of the Law of Nature. Be that as it may, this conception of sovereignty
+once introduced was universally accepted; but at the same time the
+meaning of the term became immediately a bone of contention between the
+schools of publicists. And it is to be taken into consideration that the
+science of politics has learnt to distinguish between sovereignty of
+the State and sovereignty of the agents who exercise the sovereign
+powers of the State. According to the modern view sovereignty is a
+natural attribute of every independent State as a State; and neither the
+monarch, nor Parliament, nor the people can possess any sovereignty of
+their own. The sovereignty of a monarch, or of a Parliament, or of the
+whole people is not an original attribute of their own, but derives from
+the sovereignty of the State which is governed by them. It is outside
+the scope of this lecture to give you a history of the conception of
+sovereignty, it suffices to state the undeniable fact that from the time
+when the term was first introduced into political science until the
+present day there has never been unanimity with regard to its meaning,
+except that it is a synonym for independence of all earthly authority.
+
+Now, do you believe that the independence of a State is really infringed
+because it agrees never to make war on account of a judicial dispute,
+and in case of a political dispute not to resort to arms before having
+given opportunity of mediation to International Councils of
+Conciliation? Independence is not boundless liberty of a State to do
+what it likes, without any restriction whatever. The mere fact that
+there is an International Law in existence restricts the unbounded
+liberty of action of every civilised State, because every State is
+prohibited from interfering with the affairs of every other State. The
+fact is that the independence of every State finds its limitation in the
+independence of every other State. And it is generally admitted that a
+State can through conventions--such as a treaty of alliance or of
+neutrality or others--enter into many obligations which more or less
+restrict its liberty of action. Independence is a question of degree,
+and, therefore, it is also a question of degree whether or no the
+independence of a State is vitally encroached upon by a certain
+restriction. In my opinion the independence of a State is as little
+infringed by an agreement to submit all its judicial disputes to the
+judgment of a Court and not to resort to arms for a settlement, as the
+liberty of a citizen is infringed because in a modern State he can no
+longer resort to arms on account of a dispute with a fellow citizen but
+must submit it to the judgment of the Court.
+
+And even if it were otherwise, if the entrance of a State into the new
+League of Nations did involve an infringement of its sovereignty and
+independence, humanity need not grieve over it. The Prussian conception
+of the State as an end in itself and of the authority of the State as
+something above everything else and divine--a conception which found
+support in the philosophy of Hegel and his followers--is adverse to the
+ideal of democracy and constitutional government. Just as Henri IV of
+France said 'La France vaut bien une messe,' we may well say 'La paix du
+monde vaut bien la perte de l'indépendance de l'état.'
+
+XIV. I have come to the end of this course of lectures, but before we
+part I should like, in conclusion, to touch upon a question which has
+frequently been put with regard to the proposal of a new League of
+Nations:--Can it really be expected that, in case of a great conflict of
+interests, all the members of the League will faithfully carry out their
+engagements? Will the new League stand the strain of such conflicts as
+shake the very existence of States and Nations? Will the League really
+stand the test of History?
+
+History teaches that many a State has entered into engagements with the
+intention of faithfully carrying them out, but, when a grave conflict
+arose, matters assumed a different aspect, with the consequence that the
+engagements remained unfulfilled. Will it be different in the future?
+Can the Powers which enter into the League of Nations trust to the
+security which it promises? Can they be prepared to disarm, although
+there is no guarantee that, when grave conflicts of vital interests
+arise, all the members of the League will faithfully stand by their
+engagements?
+
+These are questions which it is difficult to answer because no one can
+look into the future. We can only say that, if really constitutional and
+democratic government all the world over makes international politics
+honest and reliable and excludes secret treaties, all the chances are
+that the members of the League will see that their true interests and
+their lasting welfare are intimately connected with the necessity of
+fulfilling the obligations to which they have submitted by their
+entrance into the League. The upheaval created by the present World War,
+the many millions of lives sacrificed, and the enormous economic losses
+suffered during these years of war, not only by the belligerents but
+also by all neutrals, will be remembered for many generations to come.
+It would therefore seem to be certain that, while the memory of these
+losses in lives and wealth lasts, all the members of the League will
+faithfully carry out the obligations connected with the membership of
+the League into which they enter for the purpose of avoiding such a
+disaster as, like a bolt from the blue, fell upon mankind by the
+outbreak of the present war. On the other hand, I will not deny that no
+one can guarantee the future; that conflicts may arise which will shake
+the foundations of the League of Nations; that the League may fall to
+pieces; and that a disaster like the present may again visit mankind.
+Our generation can only do its best for the future, and it must be left
+to succeeding generations to perpetuate the work initiated by us.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX
+
+
+ Administration of Justice by International Courts, difficulties of, 62;
+   maintenance of tradition of, 67;
+   permanent institution for the, 61.
+
+ Aims of the League of Nations defined, 23, 28, 35-36.
+
+ Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of
+           International Disputes, 70.
+
+ Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, 45-55;
+   controversy respecting interpretation of, 45;
+   correspondence respecting, with Foreign Office, 48-55.
+
+ Autocratic Government, 11.
+
+
+ Belgium, 37, 66.
+
+ Bodin, 76.
+
+ Bonfils on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 49.
+
+ Bordwell on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ British Empire, 13, 20.
+
+ Bryan Peace Treaties, 71.
+
+ Bryce, Lord, scheme of, 36.
+
+
+ Central Powers, the, are they to become members of the League of
+           Nations? 17, 36;
+   necessity for utter defeat of, 15, 37.
+
+ Colonies, wars for the acquisition of, 10.
+
+ Complex cases of dispute, how to settle, 68.
+
+ Congress of Vienna, 30, 42.
+
+ Constitutional Government, 10, 11;
+   necessity for, 19.
+
+ Court of Appeal, International, 66, 67, 69;
+   manning of, 64.
+
+ Court of Arbitration, establishment of International, 61.
+
+ Court of First Instance, International, 64;
+   manning of, 66.
+
+ Crucée, Emeric, 9.
+
+
+ Davis, General, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning
+           Land Warfare, 51.
+
+ Democracy, 10, 11.
+
+ Dickinson, scheme of Sir Willoughby, 36.
+
+ Disarmament, 21, 74.
+
+ Dubois, Pierre, 8.
+
+ Dynastic wars, 10.
+
+
+ Engagements of the members of the League of Nations, security for
+           fulfilment of, 79.
+
+ Equality, of States, 33, 39;
+   of the votes at Hague Peace Conferences, 38.
+
+
+ Family, the, a product of natural development, 10.
+
+ Family of Nations, political hegemony of the Great Powers within the, 31.
+
+ Federal World State, A, 18-20;
+   demanded by Pacifists, 31;
+   why not possible, 19.
+
+ Foreign Office, letter of, to Professor Oppenheim concerning Article
+           23(h), 52-55.
+
+
+ German Confederation, civil war within the, 32.
+
+ German Weissbuch on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning
+           Land Warfare, 51, 54, 55.
+
+ Germany, is she to become a member of the League of Nations? 17, 36;
+   necessity for the utter defeat of, 15, 37.
+
+ Great Powers, 30, 66;
+   power and influence of the, 29-31.
+
+ Greece, city States of ancient, 7.
+
+ Gregory on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ Grey, Earl, 5, 52, 53, 55.
+
+ Grotians, the School of, 62.
+
+ Grotius, Hugo, 9.
+
+
+ Hague Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of International
+           Disputes, Article 8 of, 70.
+
+ Hague Peace Conferences, 34;
+   method of legislating by, 45;
+   the work of, obstructed by some States, 38;
+   standing council of, proposed, 39;
+   starting point of organisation of League of Nations by, 36, 39;
+   votes of States of equal value at, 38.
+
+ Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, controversy respecting
+           interpretation of Article 23(h) of, 45.
+
+ Henry IV of France, 9, 78.
+
+ Holland, Professor, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning
+           Land Warfare, 50.
+
+
+ Independence of States, what it is, 33, 77.
+
+ International Army and Navy, why impossible, 6, 18, 20-22, 41.
+
+ International Case Law, 64.
+
+ International Council of Conciliation, 28, 40, 69;
+   scheme for the establishment of, 72-74;
+   starting points for, 70.
+
+ International Court of Appeal, 66, 67;
+   a necessity, 63;
+   manning of, 64.
+
+ International Court of First Instance, 64;
+   manning of proposed bench to serve as, 64.
+
+ International Court of Justice, 18, 28, 65-68;
+   manning of, 65;
+   proposed permanent bench of, 65, 66;
+   proposed special benches of, for different cases, 66.
+
+ International Courts, claims of all States in manning of, 64;
+   difficulties of manning of, 65;
+   precedents of, 64.
+
+ International Executive, why impossible, 19, 41.
+
+ International Government, why impossible, 19.
+
+ International Law, a book law at present, 43;
+   and League of Nations interdependent, 6, 33;
+   complied with often without Courts, 60;
+   grew by custom during Middle Ages, 8;
+   not in being in antiquity, 6;
+   progress of, 33, 35, 38;
+   universal and general, difference between, 44.
+
+ International Legislation, 38, 41-48;
+   a by-product only in the past, 42;
+   difficulties of, created by conflicting interests of States, 44;
+   difficulties of, created by different methods of interpretation and
+             construction, 45;
+   difficulties of, created by the fact that a majority vote cannot
+             create a statute, 44;
+   difficulties of, created by the language question, 43;
+   meaning of the term, 41;
+   possible even without International Courts, 42, 60;
+   possible only by agreement of all the States, 42;
+   wide field open for, 43.
+
+ International Statutes, cannot be created by majority vote, 44;
+   interpretation and construction of, 45;
+   what are? 42.
+
+ Internationalism, growth of, 12.
+
+
+ Law-making treaties, what are? 42.
+
+ 'La France vaut bien une messe,' 78.
+
+ League of Nations, 3, 8;
+   aims defined, 23, 28, 35-36;
+   and International Law interdependent, 6;
+   career in a sense started already, 8, 16;
+   conception of, very old, 6;
+   demand for, universal, 11;
+   impossibility of state-like organisation of, 36;
+   no unanimity concerning its aims or organisation, 18;
+   organisation of, demanded, 31;
+   problems connected with, 24, 28;
+   seven principles of, which ought to be adopted, 39-41;
+   so-called, but League of States is meant, 13;
+   starting point of organisation of, 33, 36, 39;
+   constitution _sui generis_ of, a necessity, 22, 33;
+   what is new in the now desired, 11;
+   when it would be an organised community, 11, 34.
+
+
+ Marini, Antoine, 8.
+
+ Mediation, International. _See_ International Council of Conciliation.
+
+ Militarism, conception of, 15;
+   Prussian, 16.
+
+
+ Nation, the, a product of historical development, 10, 14;
+   conception of, 13, 14;
+   not to be confounded with race, 13-14.
+
+ Nations, not to be confounded with States, 13, 14.
+
+ Nationality, principle of, 14, 32.
+
+ 'Natura non facit saltus,' 5.
+
+ Naturalists, the School of, 62.
+
+
+ Oppenheim, letter of Foreign Office concerning Article 23(h) of the
+           Hague Regulations to Professor, 52-55.
+
+
+ Pacifists, 31.
+
+ Parliament, International, why impossible, 18, 19.
+
+ Permanent Court of Arbitration, International, 34;
+   establishment of, by the First Peace Conference, 61.
+
+ Permanent International Commissions of the Bryan Peace Treaties, 71.
+
+ Podiebrad, 8.
+
+ Police, International, 6, 41.
+
+ Politis on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 49, 55.
+
+ Porter _v._ Freundenberg, case of, 47.
+
+ Positivists, the School of, 62.
+
+ Precedents of International Courts, 66.
+
+ Principle of Nationality, 14, 32.
+
+ Prize Court, International, proposed by Second Peace Conference, 34.
+
+
+ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 21.
+
+
+ Race, a product of natural development, 10;
+   not to be confounded with Nation, 13, 14.
+
+ Rebus sic stantibus, proposal for dealing with the clause, 69.
+
+ Religion, wars of, 10.
+
+
+ Sovereignty, conception of, 75;
+   not surrendered by entrance into the League of Nations, 74, 75, 78.
+
+ State, ideal of the national, 14.
+
+ States of the World, the 25 Allied belligerent and the 17 neutral, 16-17.
+
+ Statutes, difference between International and Municipal, 42.
+
+ Sully, 9.
+
+ Swiss Confederation, civil war within the, 32.
+
+ Switzerland, 13.
+
+
+ Taft, Ex-President, 5.
+
+ Transoceanic States, entrance into League of Nations of, 38.
+
+ Tribe, the, a product of natural development, 10.
+
+
+ Ubi societas ibi jus, 8.
+
+ Ullmann, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ United States, civil war in the, 32.
+
+
+ Vienna Congress, the, 30, 42.
+
+ Votes, equality of, at Hague Peace Conferences, 38.
+
+
+ Wars for national unity, 10.
+
+ Wehberg on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ Whewell, Dr., 4.
+
+ Whittuck on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ Wilson, President, 5.
+
+ World Federation, a demand of Pacifists, 31.
+
+
+
+
+             AT THE BALLANTYNE PRESS
+ PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE, BALLANTYNE AND CO. LTD.
+       COLCHESTER, LONDON AND ETON, ENGLAND
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber's Note:
+
+    Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note. Variant
+    spellings have been retained. Hyphenation has been standardised.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The League of Nations and its Problems, by 
+Lassa Oppenheim
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LEAGUE OF NATIONS, ITS PROBLEMS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 26023-8.txt or 26023-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+        https://www.gutenberg.org/2/6/0/2/26023/
+
+Produced by Stephen Blundell and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
+paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.  See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
+     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
+     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+     License.  You must require such a user to return or
+     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+     Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+     of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+     Chief Executive and Director
+     gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations.  To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+     https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/26023-8.zip b/26023-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..afb6ef5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-8.zip
diff --git a/26023-h.zip b/26023-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..04c7eeb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-h.zip
diff --git a/26023-h/26023-h.htm b/26023-h/26023-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3ed09c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-h/26023-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,3816 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+  <head>
+    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+    <title>
+      The Project Gutenberg eBook of The League of Nations and its Problems, by Lassa Oppenheim
+    </title>
+    <style type="text/css">
+/*<![CDATA[  XML blockout */
+<!--
+    p {margin-top: .75em; text-align: justify; margin-bottom: .75em;}
+    h1,h2,h3,h4 {text-align: center; clear: both; font-weight: normal;}
+    h2, .signing {line-height: 1.5em;}
+    hr {width: 65%; margin: 2em auto; clear: both;}
+    table {margin: 1em 15%;}
+    td {vertical-align: bottom;}
+    .td1 {text-align: justify; padding-right: 6em;}
+    .td2, .p5 {text-align: right;}
+    .tr1 td {padding-bottom: 1em;}
+    .tr2 td {padding-bottom: .5em; font-size: small;}
+    .tr1 .td1 {padding-top: 2em; padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;}
+    .tr2 .td1 {text-indent: 2em;}
+    body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}
+    .pagenum {position: absolute; right: 1%; font-size: small; font-style: normal; text-align: right; text-indent: 0em;}
+    .blockquot {margin: 1em 10%;}
+    .center, .p1, .p3, .p4 {text-align: center;}
+    .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+    .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
+    .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
+    .fnanchor {vertical-align: 0.25em; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;}
+    .trn {border: solid 1px; margin: 3em 15%; padding: 1em; text-align: justify;}
+    a:link, a:visited {text-decoration: none;}
+    ul {list-style-type: none;}
+    .author {text-align: left; margin-left: 65%; margin-bottom: 2em;}
+    .signing {text-align: left; margin-left: 65%; text-indent: -4em;}
+    .bk1 {margin: 0 auto; width: 25em; border: solid 2px; padding: 0 .75em; font-size: small;}
+    .bk2 {margin: .75em 0;}
+    .bk2 p {margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0;}
+    .p1 {margin-bottom: 4em;}
+    .p2 {padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em; margin: .25em 0;}
+    .p3 {margin: 3em 0 2em; font-size: x-large;}
+    h3,h4 {margin-top: 2em;}
+    .p4 {margin-top: 4em;}
+    .p5 {margin-right: 2em;}
+    .fsm {font-size: medium;}
+    .fss {font-size: small;}
+    .fsxs {font-size: x-small;}
+    .sp1 {margin-left: 20em;}
+    // -->
+    /* XML end  ]]>*/
+    </style>
+  </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The League of Nations and its Problems, by 
+Lassa Oppenheim
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The League of Nations and its Problems
+       Three Lectures
+
+Author: Lassa Oppenheim
+
+Release Date: July 10, 2008 [EBook #26023]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LEAGUE OF NATIONS, ITS PROBLEMS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Stephen Blundell and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+<p class="center"><big>CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL LAW
+AND DIPLOMACY</big></p>
+
+<p class="center">Edited by <span class="smcap">L. Oppenheim</span>, M.A., LL.D.</p>
+
+<p class="p1"><small>Membre de l'Institut de Droit International,<br />
+Whewell Professor of International Law in the University of Cambridge,<br />
+Honorary Member of the Royal Academy of Jurisprudence at Madrid,<br />
+Corresponding Member of the American Institute of International Law.</small></p>
+
+<h1><small>THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS<br />
+AND ITS PROBLEMS</small></h1>
+
+<hr />
+<div class="bk1"><p class="center"><b>CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL<br />
+LAW AND DIPLOMACY.</b></p>
+
+<p class="p2">Edited by <span class="smcap">L. Oppenheim</span>, M.A., LL.D.,
+Whewell Professor of International Law in
+the University of Cambridge.</p>
+
+<p class="p2">A GUIDE TO DIPLOMATIC PRACTICE.
+By the Right Hon. Sir <span class="smcap">Ernest Satow</span>,
+G.C.M.G., LL.D., D.C.L., formerly
+Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary.
+2 Volumes. 8vo. 30<i>s.</i> net.</p>
+
+<p class="p2">INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND
+THIRD STATES. A Monograph. By
+<span class="smcap">Ronald F. Roxburgh</span>, of the Middle
+Temple, Barrister-at-Law; formerly Whewell
+International Law Scholar in the
+University of Cambridge; formerly Scholar
+of Trinity College, Cambridge. 8vo. 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>
+net.</p>
+
+<p class="center">LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.,<br />
+London, New York, Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras.</p></div>
+
+<hr />
+
+<h1>THE<br />
+<big>LEAGUE OF NATIONS</big><br />
+AND ITS PROBLEMS</h1>
+
+<p class="p3">THREE LECTURES</p>
+
+<h2><span class="fsm">BY</span><br />
+L. OPPENHEIM, M.A., LL.D.</h2>
+
+<p class="p1"><small>WHEWELL PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE<br />
+MEMBRE DE L'INSTITUT DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL. HONORARY MEMBER OF<br />
+THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF JURISPRUDENCE AT MADRID, CORRESPONDING<br />
+MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF<br />
+INTERNATIONAL LAW</small></p>
+
+<p class="p1"><i><span class="sp1">Festina lente</span></i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.<br />
+<small>39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON</small><br />
+<span class="fsxs">FOURTH AVENUE &amp; 30<span class="smcap">TH</span> STREET, NEW YORK,<br />
+BOMBAY, CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS.</span><br />
+<small>1919</small><br /></p>
+
+<hr /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[v]</a></span></p>
+<h2>PREFACE</h2>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">The</span> three lectures collected in this volume were
+prepared without any intention of publication.
+They were delivered for the purpose of drawing
+attention to the links which connect the proposal
+for a League of Nations with the past, to the difficulties
+which stand in the way of the realisation
+of the proposal, and to some schemes by which
+these difficulties might be overcome. When it
+was suggested that the lectures should be brought
+before the public at large by being issued in book
+form I hesitated, because I was doubtful whether
+the academic method natural to a University lecture
+would be suitable to a wider public. After consideration,
+however, I came to the conclusion that
+their publication might be useful, because the
+lectures attempt to show how the development
+initiated by the two Hague Peace Conferences could
+be continued by turning the movement for a League
+of Nations into the road of progress that these
+Conferences opened.</p>
+
+<p>Professional International lawyers do not share
+the belief that the outbreak of the World War and
+its, in many ways, lawless and atrocious conduct
+have proved the futility of the work of the Hague
+Conferences. Throughout these anxious years we
+have upheld the opinion that the progress initiated<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[vi]</a></span>
+at the Hague has by no means been swept away
+by the attitude of lawlessness deliberately&mdash;'because
+necessity knows no law'&mdash;taken up by Germany,
+provided only that she should be utterly defeated,
+and should be compelled to atone and make ample
+reparation for the many cruel wrongs which cry
+to Heaven. While I am writing these lines, there
+is happily no longer any doubt that this condition
+will be fulfilled. We therefore believe that, after
+the map of Europe has been redrawn by the
+coming Peace Congress, the third Conference ought
+to assemble at the Hague for the purpose of
+establishing the demanded League of Nations and
+supplying it with the rudiments of an organisation.</p>
+
+<p>How this could be accomplished in a very simple
+way the following three lectures attempt to show.
+They likewise offer some very slight outlines of a
+scheme for setting up International Councils of
+Conciliation as well as an International Court of
+Justice comprising a number of Benches. I would
+ask the reader kindly to take these very lightly
+outlined schemes for what they are worth. Whatever
+may be their defects they indicate a way out
+of some of the great difficulties which beset the
+realisation of the universal demand for International
+Councils of Conciliation and an International Court
+of Justice.</p>
+
+<p>It is well known that several of the allied Governments
+have appointed Committees to study the
+problem of a League of Nations and to prepare a
+scheme which could be put before the coming Peace
+Congress. But unless all, or at any rate all the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[vii]</a></span>
+more important, neutral States are represented,
+it will be impossible for an all-embracing League
+of Nations to be created by that Congress; although
+a scheme could well be adopted which would keep
+the door open for all civilised States. However,
+until all these States have actually been received
+within the charmed circle, the League will not be
+complete nor its aims fully realised. Whatever
+the coming Peace Congress may be able to achieve
+with regard to a scheme for the establishment of
+the League of Nations, another&mdash;the third&mdash;Hague
+Peace Conference will be needed to set it going.</p>
+
+<p class="author">L. OPPENHEIM.</p>
+
+<p><small>P.S.&mdash;While this Preface and volume were going through
+the Press, Austria-Hungary and Germany surrendered, and
+unprecedented revolutions broke out which swept the
+Hapsburg, the Hohenzollern, and all the other German
+dynasties away. No one can foresee what will be the
+ultimate fate and condition of those two once mighty
+empires. It is obvious that, had the first and second
+lectures been delivered after these stirring events took place,
+some of the views to be found therein expressed would
+have been modified or differently expressed. I may ask
+the reader kindly to keep this in mind while reading the
+following pages. However, the general bearing of the arguments,
+and the proposals for the organisation of the League
+of Nations and the establishment of an International Court
+of Justice and International Councils of Conciliation, are
+in no way influenced by these later events.</small></p>
+
+<hr /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[viii]</a></span></p>
+<h2>CONTENTS</h2>
+
+<div class='center'>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+
+<tr class="tr1"><td class="td1"><big>FIRST LECTURE: THE AIMS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS</big></td><td class="td2"><small>PAGE</small><br /><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">I. The purpose of the three Lectures is to draw attention to
+the links which connect the proposed League of Nations with
+the past, to the difficulties involved in the proposal, and to the
+way in which they can be overcome</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_4">4</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">II. The conception of a League of Nations is not new, but is
+as old as International Law, because any kind of International
+Law and some kind of a League of Nations are interdependent
+and correlative</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_6">6</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">III. During antiquity no International Law in the modern
+sense of the term was possible, because the common interests
+which could force a number of independent States into a Community
+of States were lacking</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_6">6</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">IV. But during the second part of the Middle Ages matters
+began to change. During the fifteenth, sixteenth and
+seventeenth centuries an International Law, and with it a
+kind of League of Nations, became a necessity and therefore
+grew by custom. At the same time arose the first schemes for
+a League of Nations guaranteeing permanent peace, namely
+those of Pierre Dubois (1305), Antoine Marini (1461), Sully
+(1603), and Emeric Cruc&eacute;e (1623). Hugo Grotius' immortal
+work on 'The Law of War and Peace' (1625)</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_7">7</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">V. The League of Nations thus evolved by custom could not
+undertake to prevent war; the conditions prevailing up to the
+outbreak of the French Revolution made it impossible; it
+was only during the nineteenth century that the principle
+of nationality made growth</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_9">9</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1"><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[ix]</a></span>VI. The outbreak of the present World War is epoch-making
+because it is at bottom a fight between the principle of democratic
+and constitutional government and the principle of
+militarism and autocratic government. The three new points
+in the present demand for a League of Nations</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_11">11</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VII. How and why the peremptory demand for a new
+League of Nations arose, and its connection with so-called
+Internationalism</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_11">11</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VIII. The League of Nations now aimed at is not really a
+League of Nations but of States. The ideal of the national
+State</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_13">13</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">IX. The two reasons why the establishment of a new League
+of Nations is conditioned by the utter defeat of the Central
+Powers</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_15">15</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">X. Why&mdash;in a sense&mdash;the new League of Nations may be
+said to have already started its career</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_16">16</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XI. The impossibility of the demand that the new League
+of Nations should create a Federal World State</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_18">18</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XII. The demand for an International Army and Navy</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_20">20</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XIII. The new League of Nations cannot give itself a constitution
+of a state-like character, but only one <i>sui generis</i>
+on very simple lines</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_22">22</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XIV. The three aims of the new League of Nations, and the
+four problems to be faced and solved in order to make possible
+the realisation of these aims</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_23">23</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr1"><td class="td1"><big>SECOND LECTURE: ORGANISATION AND LEGISLATION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS</big></td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_25">25</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">I. The Community of civilised States, the at present existing
+League of Nations, is a community without any organisation,
+although there are plenty of legal rules for the intercourse
+of the several States one with another</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_28">28</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">II. The position of the Great Powers within the Community
+of States is a mere political fact not based on Law</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_29">29</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1"><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[x]</a></span>III. The pacifistic demand or a Federal World State in
+order to make the abolition of war a possibility</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_31">31</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">IV. Every attempt at organising the desired new League
+of Nations must start from, and keep intact, the independence
+and equality of the several States, with the consequence that
+the establishment of a central political authority above the
+sovereign States is an impossibility</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_32">32</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">V. The development of an organisation of the Community of
+States began before the outbreak of the World War and is to be
+found in the establishment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration
+at the Hague by the First Hague Peace Conference of 1899.
+But more steps will be necessary to turn the hitherto unorganised
+Community of States into an organised League of
+Nations</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_34">34</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VI. The organisation of the desired new League of Nations
+should start from the beginning made by the Hague Peace
+Conferences, and the League should therefore include all the
+independent civilised States</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_35">35</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VII. The objection to the reception of the Central Powers,
+and of Germany especially, into the League</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_36">36</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VIII. The objection to the reception of the minor transoceanic
+States into the League</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_38">38</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">IX. The seven principles which ought to be accepted with
+regard to the organisation of the new League of Nations</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_39">39</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">X. The organisation of the League of Nations is not an end
+in itself but only a means of attaining three objects, the first of
+which is International Legislation. The meaning of the term
+'International Legislation' in contradistinction to Municipal
+Legislation. International Legislation in the past and in the
+future</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_41">41</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XI. The difficulty in the way of International Legislation
+on account of the language question</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_43">43</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XII. The difficulty created by the conflicting national
+interests of the several States</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_44">44</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1"><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">[xi]</a></span>XIII. The difficulty caused by the fact that International
+Statutes cannot be created by a majority vote of the States.
+The difference between universal and general International
+Law offers a way out</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_44">44</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XIV. The difficulty created by the fact that there are as
+yet no universally recognised rules concerning interpretation
+and construction of International Statutes and ordinary Conventions.
+The notorious Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations
+concerning Land Warfare</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_45">45</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1"><i>Appendix</i>: Correspondence with the Foreign Office respecting
+the Interpretation of Article 23(h) of the Hague
+Regulations concerning Land Warfare</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr1"><td class="td1"><big>THIRD LECTURE: ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND MEDIATION WITHIN THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS</big></td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_57">57</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">I. Administration of Justice within the League is a question
+of International Courts, but it is incorrect to assert that International
+Legislation necessitates the existence of International
+Courts</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_60">60</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">II. The Permanent Court of Arbitration created by the
+First Hague Peace Conference</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_61">61</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">III. The difficulties connected with International Administration
+of Justice by International Courts</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_62">62</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">IV. The necessity for a Court of Appeal above the International
+Court of First Instance</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_63">63</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">V. The difficulties connected with the setting up and
+manning of International Courts of Justice</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_64">64</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself because
+it distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several
+Benches which would be called upon to decide the cases</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_65">65</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VII. The advantages of the recommended scheme</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_67">67</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">VIII. A necessary provision for so-called complex cases of
+dispute</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_68">68</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">IX. A necessary provision with regard to the notorious
+clause <i>rebus sic stantibus</i></td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_69">69</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xii" id="Page_xii">[xii]</a></span></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">X. The two starting points for a satisfactory proposal
+concerning International Mediation by International Councils
+of Conciliation. Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning
+Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. The
+Permanent International Commissions of the Bryan Peace
+Treaties</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_70">70</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself for the
+establishment of International Councils of Conciliation</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_72">72</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XII. The question of disarmament</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_74">74</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XIII. The assertion that States renounce their sovereignty
+by entering into the League</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_75">75</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr2"><td class="td1">XIV. Conclusion: Can it be expected that, in case of a
+great conflict of interests, all the members of the League will
+faithfully carry out their engagements?</td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_78">78</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr class="tr1"><td class="td1"><span class="smcap">Alphabetical Index</span></td><td class="td2"><a href="#Page_81">81</a></td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<hr /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[1]</a></span></p>
+<h2><span class="smcap">First Lecture</span><br />
+THE AIMS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS</h2>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></span></p>
+<h3>SYNOPSIS</h3>
+
+<div class="fss"><p>I. The purpose of the three Lectures is to draw attention to the
+links which connect the proposed League of Nations with the past,
+to the difficulties involved in the proposal, and to the way in which
+they can be overcome.</p>
+
+<p>II. The conception of a League of Nations is not new, but is
+as old as International Law, because any kind of International
+Law and some kind of a League of Nations are interdependent
+and correlative.</p>
+
+<p>III. During antiquity no International Law in the modern sense
+of the term was possible, because the common interests which could
+force a number of independent States into a community of States
+were lacking.</p>
+
+<p>IV. But during the second part of the Middle Ages matters
+began to change. During the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth
+centuries an International Law, and with it a kind of League
+of Nations, became a necessity and therefore grew by custom. At
+the same time arose the first schemes for a League of Nations
+guaranteeing permanent peace, namely those of Pierre Dubois
+(1305), Antoine Marini (1461), Sully (1603), and Emeric Cruc&eacute;e
+(1623). Hugo Grotius' immortal work on 'The Law of War and
+Peace' (1625).</p>
+
+<p>V. The League of Nations thus evolved by custom could not
+undertake to prevent wars; the conditions prevailing up to the outbreak
+of the French Revolution made it impossible; it was only
+during the nineteenth century that the principle of nationality
+made growth.</p>
+
+<p>VI. The outbreak of the present World War is epoch-making
+because it is at bottom a fight between the principle of democratic
+and constitutional government and the principle of militarism and
+autocratic government. The three new points in the present demand
+for a League of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>VII. How and why the peremptory demand for a new League
+of Nations arose, and its connection with so-called Internationalism.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>VIII. The League of Nations now aimed at is not really a League
+of Nations but of States. The ideal of the National State.</p>
+
+<p>IX. The two reasons why the establishment of a new League
+of Nations is conditioned by the utter defeat of the Central Powers.</p>
+
+<p>X. Why&mdash;in a sense&mdash;the new League of Nations may be said
+to have already started its career.</p>
+
+<p>XI. The impossibility of the demand that the new League of
+Nations should create a Federal World State.</p>
+
+<p>XII. The demand for an International Army and Navy.</p>
+
+<p>XIII. The new League of Nations cannot give itself a constitution
+of a state-like character, but only one <i>sui generis</i> on very simple
+lines.</p>
+
+<p>XIV. The three aims of the new League of Nations, and the
+four problems to be faced and solved in order to make possible the
+realisation of these aims.</p></div>
+
+<h3>THE LECTURE</h3>
+
+<p>I. Dr. Whewell, the founder of the Chair of International
+Law which I have the honour to occupy
+in this University, laid the injunction upon every
+holder of the Chair that he should 'make it his
+aim,' in all parts of his treatment of the subject,
+'to lay down such rules and suggest such measures
+as may tend to diminish the evils of war and finally
+to extinguish war between nations.' It is to comply
+with the spirit, if not with the letter, of this injunction
+that I have announced the series of three
+lectures on a League of Nations. The present is
+the first, and in it I propose to treat of the Aims
+of the League. But, before I enter into a discussion
+of these aims, I should like to point out that I have
+no intention of dealing with the question whether
+or no a League of Nations should be founded at
+all. To my mind, and probably to the minds of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span>
+most of you here, this question has been satisfactorily
+answered by the leading politicians of all
+parties and all countries since ex-President Taft
+put it soon after the outbreak of the World War;
+it suffices to mention Earl Grey in Great Britain
+and President Wilson in America. In giving these
+lectures I propose to draw your attention, on the
+one hand, to the links which connect the proposal
+for a League of Nations with the past, and, on the
+other hand, to the difficulties with which the realisation
+of the proposal must necessarily be attended;
+and also to the ways in which, in my opinion, these
+difficulties can be overcome.</p>
+
+<p>There is an old adage which says <i>Natura non
+facit saltus</i>, Nature takes no leaps. Everything in
+Nature develops gradually, step by step, and
+organically. It is, at any rate as a rule, the same
+with History. History in most cases takes no leaps,
+but if exceptionally History does take a leap, there
+is great danger of a bad slip backwards following.
+We must be on our guard lest the proposed League
+of Nations should take a leap in the dark, and
+the realisation of proposals be attempted which
+are so daring and so entirely out of keeping with
+the historical development of International Law
+and the growth of the Society of Nations, that there
+would be great danger of the whole scheme collapsing
+and the whole movement coming to naught.</p>
+
+<p>The movement for a League of Nations is sound,
+for its purpose is to secure a more lasting peace
+amongst the nations of the world than has hitherto
+prevailed. But a number of schemes to realise this<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span>
+purpose have been published which in my opinion
+go much too far because they comprise proposals
+which are not realisable in our days. You know
+that not only an International Court of Justice
+and an International Council of Conciliation have
+been proposed, but also some kind of International
+Government, some kind of International Parliament,
+an International Executive, and even an
+International Army and Navy&mdash;a so-called International
+Police&mdash;by the help of which the International
+Government could guarantee the condition
+of permanent peace in the world.</p>
+
+<p>II. You believe no doubt, because nearly everyone
+believes it, that the conception of a League of
+Nations is something quite new. Yet this is not
+the case, although there is something new in the
+present conception, something which did not exist
+previously. The conception of a League of Nations
+is very old, is indeed as old as modern International
+Law, namely about four hundred years. International
+Law could not have come into existence
+without at the same time calling into existence a
+League of Nations. <i>Any kind of an International
+Law and some kind or other of a League of Nations
+are interdependent and correlative.</i> This assertion
+possibly surprises you, and I must therefore say a
+few words concerning the origin of modern International
+Law in order to make matters clear.</p>
+
+<p>III. In ancient times no International Law in
+the modern sense of the term existed. It is true
+there existed rules of religion and of law concerning
+international relations, and ambassadors and heralds<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span>
+were everywhere considered sacrosanct. But these
+rules were not rules of an <i>International</i> Law, they
+were either religious rules or rules which were part
+of the Municipal Law of the several States. For
+instance: the Romans had very detailed rules
+concerning their relations with other States in time
+of peace and war; but these were rules of Roman
+law, not rules of the law of other countries, and
+certainly not <i>international</i> rules.</p>
+
+<p>Now what was the reason that antiquity did not
+know of any International Law?</p>
+
+<p>The reason was that between the several independent
+States of antiquity no such intimate intercourse
+arose and no such common views existed as
+to necessitate a law between them. Only between
+the several city States of ancient Greece arose some
+kind of what we should now call 'International
+Law,' because these city States formed a Community
+fostered by the same language, the same civilisation,
+the same religion, the same general ideas, and by
+constant commercial and other intercourse. On
+the other hand, the Roman Empire was a world
+empire, it gradually absorbed all the independent
+nations in the West. And when the Roman Empire
+fell to pieces in consequence of the migration of the
+peoples, the old civilisation came to an end, international
+commerce and intercourse ceased almost
+entirely, and it was not till towards the end of the
+Middle Ages that matters began to change.</p>
+
+<p>IV. During the second part of the Middle Ages
+more and more independent States arose on the
+European continent, and during the fifteenth and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span>
+sixteenth centuries the necessity for a Law of Nations
+made itself felt. A multitude of Sovereign States
+had now established themselves which, although
+they were absolutely independent of one another,
+were knitted together by constant commercial and
+other intercourse, by a common religion, and by
+the same moral principles. Gradually and almost
+unconsciously the conviction had grown upon these
+independent States that, in spite of everything
+which separated them, they formed a Community
+the intercourse of which was ruled by certain legal
+principles. International Law grew out of custom
+because it was a necessity according to the well-known
+rule <i>ubi societas ibi jus</i>, where there is a
+community of interests there must be law. The
+several independent States had thus gradually and
+unconsciously formed themselves into a Society,
+the afterwards so-called Family of Nations, or, in
+other words, a League of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>And no sooner had this League of Nations come
+into existence&mdash;and even some time before that
+date&mdash;than a number of schemes for the establishment
+of eternal peace made their appearance.</p>
+
+<p>The first of these schemes was that of the French
+lawyer <i>Pierre Dubois</i>, who, as early as 1305, in his
+work 'De recuperatione terre sancte,' proposed an
+alliance between all Christian Powers for the purpose
+of the maintenance of peace and the establishment
+of a permanent Court of Arbitration for the settlement
+of differences between members of the alliance.</p>
+
+<p>Another was that of <i>Antoine Marini</i>, the Chancellor
+of Podiebrad, King of Bohemia, who adopted the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span>
+scheme in 1461. This scheme proposed the foundation
+of a Federal State to comprise all the existing
+Christian States and the establishment of a permanent
+Congress to be seated at Basle in Switzerland, this
+Congress to be the highest organ of the Federation.</p>
+
+<p>A third scheme was that of <i>Sully</i>, adopted by
+Henri IV of France, which, in 1603, proposed the
+division of Europe into fifteen States and the linking
+together of these into a Federation with a General
+Council as its highest organ.</p>
+
+<p>And a fourth scheme was that of <i>Emeric Cruc&eacute;e</i>,
+who, in 1623, proposed the establishment of a Union
+consisting not only of the Christian States but of
+all States of the world, with a General Council seated
+at Venice.</p>
+
+<p>And since that time many other schemes of similar
+kind have made their appearance, the enumeration
+and discussion of which is outside our present purpose.
+So much is certain that all these schemes
+were Utopian. Nevertheless, a League of Nations
+having once come into existence, International Law
+grew more and more, and when in 1625 Hugo Grotius
+published his immortal work on 'The Law of War
+and Peace,' the system of International Law offered
+in his work conquered the world and became the
+basis of all following development.</p>
+
+<p>V. However, although a League of Nations must
+be said to have been in existence for about 400
+years, because no International Law would have
+been possible without it, this League of Nations
+could not, and was not intended to, prevent war
+between its members. I say: it could not prevent<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span>
+war. Why not? It could not prevent war on
+account of the conditions which prevailed within
+the international society from the Middle Ages till,
+say, the outbreak of the present war. These conditions
+are intimately connected with the growth
+of the several States of Europe.</p>
+
+<p>Whereas the family, the tribe, and the race are
+natural products, the nation as well as the State are
+products of historical development. All nations are
+blends of more or less different races, and all States
+were originally founded on force: strong rulers
+subjected neighbouring tribes and peoples to their
+sway and thus formed coherent nations. Most
+of the States in Europe are the product of the
+activity of strong dynasties which through war
+and conquest, and through marriage and purchase,
+united under one sovereign the lands which form
+the States and the peoples which form the nations.
+Up to the time of the French Revolution, throughout
+the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth
+centuries, all wars were either wars of religion, or
+dynastic wars fought for the increase of the territory
+under the sway of the dynasties concerned, or so-called
+colonial wars fought for the acquisition of
+transoceanic colonies. It was not till the nineteenth
+century that wars for the purpose of national
+unity broke out, and dynastic wars began gradually
+to disappear. During the nineteenth century the
+nations, so to say, found themselves; some kind of
+constitutional government was everywhere introduced;
+and democracy became the ideal, although
+it was by no means everywhere realised.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>VI. It is for this reason that the outbreak of the
+present war is epoch-making, because it has become
+apparent that, whatever may be the war aims of
+the belligerents, at bottom this World War is a
+fight between the ideal of democracy and constitutional
+government on the one hand, and autocratic
+government and militarism on the other.
+Everywhere the conviction has become prevalent
+that things cannot remain as they were before the
+outbreak of the present war, and therefore the
+demand for a League of Nations, or&mdash;I had better
+say&mdash;for a new League of Nations to take the place
+of that which has been in existence for about 400
+years, has arisen.</p>
+
+<p>Now what is new in the desired new League of
+Nations?</p>
+
+<p>Firstly, this new League would be founded upon
+a solemn treaty, whereas the League of Nations
+hitherto was only based upon custom.</p>
+
+<p>Secondly, for the purpose of making war rarer
+or of abolishing it altogether, this new League
+of Nations would enact the rule that no State is
+allowed to resort to arms without previously having
+submitted the dispute to an International Court or
+a Council of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>Thirdly, this new League of Nations would be
+compelled to create some kind of organisation for
+itself, because otherwise it could not realise its
+purpose to make war rarer or abolish it altogether.</p>
+
+<p>VII. The demand for a new League of Nations
+is universal, for it is made, not only everywhere
+in the allied countries, but in the countries of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span>
+Central Powers, and it will surely be realised when
+the war is over, at any rate to a certain extent. It
+is for this reason that the present World War has
+not only not destroyed so-called Internationalism,
+but has done more for it than many years of peace
+could have done.</p>
+
+<p>What is Internationalism?</p>
+
+<p>Internationalism is the conviction that all the
+civilised States form one Community throughout
+the world in spite of the various factors which
+separate the nations from one another; the conviction
+that the interests of all the nations and States
+are indissolubly interknitted, and that, therefore,
+the Family of Nations must establish international
+institutions for the purpose of guaranteeing a more
+general and a more lasting peace than existed in
+former times. Internationalism had made great
+strides during the second part of the nineteenth
+century on account of the enormous development
+of international commerce and international communication
+favoured by railways, the steamship,
+the telegraph, and a great many scientific discoveries
+and technical inventions. But what a disturbing
+and destroying factor war really is, had not become
+fully apparent till the present war, because this is a
+<i>world</i> war which interferes almost as much with the
+welfare of neutrals as with the welfare of belligerents.
+It has become apparent during the present war that
+the discoveries and developments of science and
+technology, which had done so much during the
+second half of the nineteenth century for the material
+welfare of the human race during peace, were likewise<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span>
+at the disposal of belligerents for an enormous,
+and hitherto unthought-of, destruction of life and
+wealth. It is for this reason that in the camp of
+friend and foe, among neutrals as well as among
+belligerents, the conviction has become universal
+that the conditions of international life prevailing
+before the outbreak of the World War must be
+altered; that international institutions must be
+established which will make the outbreak of war,
+if not impossible, at any rate only an exceptional
+possibility. The demand for a new League of
+Nations has thus arisen and peremptorily requires
+fulfilment.</p>
+
+<p>VIII. However, in considering the demand for
+a new League of Nations, it is necessary to avoid
+confusing nations with States. It should always
+be remembered that, when we speak of a League of
+Nations, we do not really mean a League of Nations
+but a League of States. It is true that there are
+many States in existence which in the main are
+made up of one nation, although fractions of other
+nations may be comprised in them. But it is equally
+true that there are some States in existence which
+include members of several nations. Take as an
+example Switzerland which, although only a very
+small State, nevertheless comprises three national
+elements, namely German, French, and Italian.
+Another example is the British Empire, which is a
+world empire and comprises a number of different
+nations.</p>
+
+<p>That leads me to the question: What is a nation?</p>
+
+<p>A nation must not be confounded with a race.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span>
+A nation is a product of historical development,
+whereas a race is a product of natural growth. One
+speaks of a nation when a complex body of human
+beings is united by living in the same land, by
+the same language, the same literature, the same
+historical traditions, and the same general views of
+life. All nations are a mixture of several diverse
+racial elements which in the course of historical
+development have to a certain extent been united
+by force of circumstances. The Swiss as a people
+are politically a nation, although the component
+parts of the population of Switzerland are of different
+national characters and even speak different
+languages. Historical development in general, and
+in many cases force in particular, have played a
+great part in the blending of diverse racial elements
+into nations; just as they have played a great part
+in the building up of States. The demand that
+every nation should have a separate State of its
+own&mdash;the ideal of the so-called national State&mdash;appears
+very late in history; it is a product of the
+last two centuries, and it was not till the second half
+of the nineteenth century that the so-called principle
+of nationality made its appearance and gained great
+influence. It may well be doubted whether each
+nation, be it ever so small, will succeed in establishing
+a separate State of its own, although where
+national consciousness becomes overwhelmingly
+strong, it will probably in every case succeed in
+time either in establishing a State of its own, or at
+any rate in gaining autonomy. Be that as it may,
+it is a question for the future; so much is certain,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span>
+what is intended now to be realised, is not a League
+of Nations, but a League of States, although it is
+called a League of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>IX. However, no League of Nations is possible
+unless the Central Powers, and Germany in especial,
+are utterly defeated during the World War, and
+that for two reasons.</p>
+
+<p>One reason is that a great alteration of the map
+of Europe is an absolutely necessary condition for
+the satisfactory working of a League of Nations.
+Unless an independent Poland be established; unless
+the problem of Alsace-Lorraine be solved; unless
+the Trentino be handed over to Italy; unless the
+Yugo-Slavs be united with Servia; unless the
+Czecho-Slovaks be freed from the Austrian yoke;
+and unless the problem of Turkey and the Turkish
+Straits be solved, no lasting peace can be expected
+in Europe, even if a League of Nations be established.</p>
+
+<p>The other reason is that, unless Germany be
+utterly defeated, the spirit of militarism, which is
+not compatible with a League of Nations, will remain
+a menace to the world.</p>
+
+<p>What is militarism? It is that conception of the
+State which bases the power of the State, its influence,
+its progress, and its development exclusively on
+military force. The consequence is that war becomes
+part of the settled policy of a militarist State; the
+acquisition of further territory and population by
+conquest is continually before the eyes of such a
+Government; and the condition of peace is only a
+shorter or longer interval between periods of war.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span>
+A military State submits to International Law only
+so long as it serves its interests, but violates International
+Law, and particularly International Law
+concerning war, wherever and whenever this law
+stands in the way of its military aims. The whole
+history of Prussia exemplifies this. Now in a League
+of Nations peace must be the normal condition.
+If war occurs at all within such a League, it can
+only be an exceptional phase and must be only for
+the purpose of re-establishing peace. It is true a
+League of Nations will not be able entirely to dispense
+with military force, yet such force appears
+only in the background as an <i>ultima ratio</i> to be applied
+against such Power as refuses to submit its
+disagreements with other members of the League
+either to an International Court of Justice or an
+International Council of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>X. Be that as it may, in a sense the League of
+Nations has already started its career, because
+twenty-five States are united on the one side and
+are fighting this war in vindication of International
+Law. These States are&mdash;I enumerate them chronologically
+as they entered into the war:&mdash;Russia
+(the Bolsheviks have made peace, but in fact one
+may still enumerate Russia as a belligerent), France,
+Belgium, Great Britain, Servia, Montenegro, Japan,
+San Marino, Portugal, Italy, Roumania, the United
+States, Cuba, Panama, Greece, Siam, Liberia, China,
+Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica,
+Haiti, Honduras. Besides these twenty-five States
+which are at war with the Central Powers, the following
+four States, without having declared war, have<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span>
+broken off diplomatic relations with Germany,
+namely: Bolivia, San Domingo, Peru, Uruguay.</p>
+
+<p>Now there may be said to be about fifty civilised
+States in existence. Of these, as I have just pointed
+out, twenty-five are fighting against the Central
+Powers, four have broken off relations with Germany,
+the Central Powers themselves are four in number,
+with the consequence that thirty-three of the fifty
+States are implicated in the war. Only the seventeen
+remaining States are neutral, namely: Sweden,
+Norway, Denmark, Holland, Luxemburg, Switzerland,
+Spain, Lichtenstein, and Monaco in Europe;
+Mexico, Salvador, Colombia, Venezuela, Chile,
+Argentina, and Paraguay in America; and Persia
+in Asia.</p>
+
+<p>It may be taken for granted that all the neutral
+States, and all the States fighting on the side of
+the Allies, and also the four States which, although
+they are not fighting on the side of the Allies, have
+broken off relations with Germany, are prepared
+to enter into a League of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>But what about the Central Powers, and Germany
+in especial? I shall discuss in my next lecture the
+question whether the Central Powers are to become
+members of the League. To-day it must suffice to
+say that, when once utterly defeated, they will be
+only too glad to be received as members. On the
+other hand, if they were excluded, the world would
+again be divided into two rival camps, just as before
+the war the Triple Alliance was faced by the Entente.
+No disarmament would be possible, and with regard
+to every other matter progress would be equally<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span>
+impossible. Therefore the Central Powers must
+become members of a League of Nations for such
+a League to be of any great use, which postulates
+as a <i>sine qua non</i> that Germany must be utterly
+defeated in the present war. If she were victorious,
+or if peace were concluded with an undefeated
+Germany, the world would not be ripe for a League
+of Nations because militarism would not have been
+exterminated.</p>
+
+<p>XI. I have hitherto discussed the League of
+Nations only in a general way, without mentioning
+that there is no unanimity concerning its aims or
+concerning the details of its organisation. Many
+people think that it would be possible to do away
+with war for ever, and they therefore demand a
+World State, a Federal State comprising all the
+single States of the world on the pattern of the
+United States of America. And for this reason the
+demand is raised not only for an International Court
+and for an International Council of Conciliation,
+but also for an International Government, an International
+Parliament, and an International Army
+and Navy,&mdash;a so-called International Police.</p>
+
+<p>I believe that these demands go much too far
+and are impossible of realisation. A Federal State
+comprising all the single States of the whole civilised
+world is a Utopia, and an International Army and
+Navy would be a danger to the peace of the world.</p>
+
+<p>Why is a World State not possible, at any rate
+not in our time?</p>
+
+<p>No one has ever thought that a World State in
+the form of one single State with one single Government<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span>
+would be possible. Those who plead for a
+World State plead for it in the form of a Federal
+State comprising all the single States of the world
+on the pattern of the United States of America.
+But even this modified ideal is not, in my opinion,
+realisable at present. Why not? To realise this
+ideal there would be required a Federal Government,
+and a Federal Parliament; and the Federal Government
+would have to possess strong powers to enforce
+its demands. A powerless Federal Government
+would be worse than no government at all. But
+how is it possible to establish at present a powerful
+Federal Government over the whole world? How is
+it possible to establish a Federal World Parliament?</p>
+
+<p>Constitutional Government within the several
+States has to grapple with many difficulties, and
+these difficulties would be more numerous, greater,
+and much more complicated within a Federal World
+State. We need democracy and constitutional
+Government in every single State, and this can only
+be realised by party Government and elections of
+Parliament at short intervals. The waves of party
+strife rise high within the several States; no sooner
+is one party in, than the other party looks out for
+an opening into which a wedge can be pushed to
+turn the Government out. In normal times this
+works on the whole quite well within the borders
+of the several States, because the interests concerned
+are not so widely opposed to one another
+that the several parties cannot alternatively govern.
+But when it comes to applying the same system of
+Government to a Federal World State, the interests<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</a></span>
+at stake are too divergent. The East and the West,
+the South and the North, the interests of maritime
+States and land-locked States, the ideals and interests
+of industrial and agricultural States, and many other
+contrasts, are too great for it to be possible to govern
+a Federal World State by the same institutions as a
+State of ordinary size and composition.</p>
+
+<p>The British World Empire may be taken as an
+example to show that it is impossible for one single
+central Government to govern a number of States
+with somewhat divergent interests. We all know
+that the British Empire comprising the United
+Kingdom and the so-called independent dominions,
+namely Canada, Newfoundland, Australia, New
+Zealand, and South Africa, is kept together not
+really by the powers of the British Government
+but by the good will of the component parts. The
+Government of the United Kingdom could not
+keep the Empire together by force, could not compel
+by force one of the independent dominions to submit
+to a demand, in case it refused to comply. The
+interests of the several component parts of the
+British Empire are so divergent that no central
+Government could keep them together against their
+will. Now what applies to the British Empire, which
+is to a great extent bound together by the same
+language, the same literature, and the same Law,
+would apply much more to a Federal State comprising
+the whole of the world: such a Federal State, so
+far as we can see, is impossible.</p>
+
+<p>XII. But what about an International Army and
+Navy?<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>It is hardly worth while to say much about them.
+Those who propose the establishment of an International
+Army and Navy presuppose that the
+national armies and navies would be abolished so
+that the world Government would have the power,
+with the help of the International Army and Navy,
+at any moment to crush any attempt of a recalcitrant
+member of the Federal World State to avoid its
+duties. This International Army and Navy would
+be the most powerful instrument of force which the
+world has ever seen, because every attempt to resist
+it would be futile. And the Commander of the
+International Army and the Commander of the
+International Navy would be men holding in their
+hands the greatest power that can be imagined.</p>
+
+<p>The old question therefore arises: <i>Quis custodiet
+ipsos custodes?</i> which I should like here to translate
+freely by: Who will keep in order those who are
+to keep the world in order? A League of Nations
+which can only be kept together by a powerful
+International Army and Navy, is a contradiction
+in itself; for the independence and equality of the
+member States of the League would soon disappear.
+It is a fact&mdash;I make this statement although I am
+sure it will be violently contradicted&mdash;that, just as
+hitherto, so within a League of Nations some kind
+of Balance of Power only can guarantee the independence
+and equality of the smaller States. For
+the Community of Power, on which the League of
+Nations must rest, would at once disappear if one
+or two members of the League became so powerful
+that they could disregard the combined power of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span>
+the other members. Every scheme of this movement
+must therefore see to it that no member of the
+League is more armed than is necessary considering
+the extent of its territory and other factors concerned.
+But be that as it may, an International Army and
+Navy is practically impossible, just as a Federal
+World State is impossible.</p>
+
+<p>XIII. Yet while a Federal World State is impossible,
+a League of Nations is not, provided such league
+gives itself a constitution, not of a state-like character,
+but one <i>sui generis</i>. What can be done is this: the
+hitherto unorganised Family of Nations can organise
+itself on simple lines so as to secure, on the one
+hand, the absolute independence of every State,
+and, on the other hand, the peaceful co-existence
+of all the States.</p>
+
+<p>It is possible, in my opinion, to establish an International
+Court of Justice before which the several
+States engage to appear in case a conflict arises
+between two or more of them which can be judicially
+settled, that is, can be settled by a rule of law. There
+is as little reason why two or more States should
+go to war on account of a conflict which can be
+settled upon the basis of law, as there is for two
+private individuals to resort to arms in case of a
+dispute between them which can be decided by a
+Court of Law.</p>
+
+<p>Again, although there will frequently arise between
+States conflicts of a political character which cannot
+be settled on the basis of a rule of law, there is no
+reason why, when the States in conflict cannot settle
+them by diplomatic negotiation, they should resort<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span>
+to arms, before bringing the conflict before some
+Council of Conciliation and giving the latter an
+opportunity of investigating the matter and proposing
+a fair compromise.</p>
+
+<p>Under modern conditions of civilisation the whole
+world suffers in case war breaks out between even
+only two States, and for this reason it is advisable
+that the rest of the world should unite and oppose
+such State as would resort to arms without having
+submitted its case to an International Court of
+Justice or an International Council of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>XIV. In my opinion the aims of a League of
+Nations should therefore be three:</p>
+
+<p>The first aim should be to prevent the outbreak
+of war altogether on account of so-called judicial
+disputes, that is disputes which can be settled on
+the basis of a rule of law. For this reason the League
+should stipulate that every State must submit all
+judicial disputes without exception to an International
+Court of Justice and must abide by the
+judgment of such Court.</p>
+
+<p>The second aim should be to prevent the sudden
+outbreak of war on account of a political dispute and
+to insist on an opportunity for mediation. For this
+reason the League should stipulate that every State,
+previous to resorting to arms over a political dispute,
+must submit it to an International Council of Conciliation
+and must at any rate listen to the advice
+of such Council.</p>
+
+<p>The third aim should be to provide a sanction
+for the enforcement of the two rules just mentioned.
+For this reason the League should stipulate that all<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></span>
+the member States of the League must unite their
+economic, military, and naval forces against such
+member or members as would resort to arms either
+on account of a judicial dispute which ought to have
+been settled by an International Court of Justice,
+or on account of a political dispute without previously
+having submitted it to an International Council of
+Conciliation and listened to the latter's advice.</p>
+
+<p>These should be, in my opinion, the three aims of
+a League of Nations and the three rules necessary
+for the realisation of these aims. However, it is not
+so easy to realise them, and it is therefore necessary
+to face and solve four problems: There is, firstly,
+the problem of the Organisation of the League;
+secondly, the problem of Legislation within the
+League; thirdly, the problem of Administration of
+Justice within the League; and fourthly, the problem
+of Mediation within the League&mdash;four problems which
+I shall discuss in the two following lectures.</p>
+
+<p>I have only named three aims and four problems
+because I have in my mind those aims which are the
+nearest and those problems which are the most
+pressing and the most urgent. The range of vision
+of the League of Nations, when once established,
+will no doubt gradually become wider and wider;
+new aims will arise and new problems will demand
+solution, but all such possible future aims and future
+problems are outside the scope of these lectures.</p>
+
+<hr /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</a></span></p>
+<h2><span class="smcap">Second Lecture</span><br />
+ORGANISATION AND LEGISLATION OF
+THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS</h2>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</a></span></p>
+<h3>SYNOPSIS</h3>
+
+<div class="fss"><p>I. The Community of civilised States, the at present existing
+League of Nations, is a community without any organisation, although
+there are plenty of legal rules for the intercourse of the several
+States one with another.</p>
+
+<p>II. The position of the Great Powers within the Community of
+States is a mere political fact not based on Law.</p>
+
+<p>III. The pacifistic demand for a Federal World State in order
+to make the abolition of war a possibility.</p>
+
+<p>IV. Every attempt at organising the desired new League of
+Nations must start from, and keep intact, the independence and
+equality of the several States, with the consequence that the establishment
+of a central political authority above the sovereign States
+is an impossibility.</p>
+
+<p>V. The development of an organisation of the Community of
+States began before the outbreak of the World War and is to be
+found in the establishment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration
+at the Hague by the First Hague Peace Conference of 1899. But
+more steps will be necessary to turn the hitherto unorganised Community
+of States into an organised League of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>VI. The organisation of the desired new League of Nations should
+start from the beginning made by the Hague Peace Conferences, and
+the League should therefore include all the independent civilised States.</p>
+
+<p>VII. The objection to the reception of the Central Powers, and
+of Germany especially, into the League.</p>
+
+<p>VIII. The objection to the reception of the minor transoceanic
+States into the League.</p>
+
+<p>IX. The seven principles which ought to be accepted with regard
+to the organisation of the new League of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>X. The organisation of the League of Nations is not an end in
+itself but only a means of attaining three objects, the first of which
+is International Legislation. The meaning of the term 'International
+Legislation' in contradistinction to Municipal Legislation.
+International Legislation in the past and in the future.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>XI. The difficulty in the way of International Legislation on
+account of the language question.</p>
+
+<p>XII. The difficulty created by the conflicting national interests
+of the several States.</p>
+
+<p>XIII. The difficulty caused by the fact that International Statutes
+cannot be created by a majority vote of the States. The difference
+between universal and general International Law offers a way out.</p>
+
+<p>XIV. The difficulty created by the fact that there are as yet
+no universally recognised rules concerning interpretation and construction
+of International Statutes and ordinary conventions. The
+notorious Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+Warfare.</p></div>
+
+<h3>THE LECTURE</h3>
+
+<p>I. In my first lecture on the League of Nations
+I recommended the following three rules to be laid
+down by a League of Nations:</p>
+
+<p>Firstly, every State must submit all judicial
+disputes to an International Court of Justice and
+must abide by the judgment of such Court.</p>
+
+<p>Secondly, every State previous to resorting to
+arms, must submit every political and non-judicial
+dispute to an International Council of Conciliation
+and must at any rate listen to the advice of such
+Council.</p>
+
+<p>Thirdly, the member States must unite their
+forces against such State or States as should resort
+to arms without previously having submitted the
+matter in dispute to an International Court of
+Justice or to an International Council of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>And I added that these three rules cannot create
+a satisfactory condition of affairs unless four problems
+are faced and solved, namely: The Organisation of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</a></span>
+the League, Legislation by the League, Administration
+of Justice and Mediation within the League. My lecture
+to-day will deal with two of these problems, namely
+the Organisation and the Legislation of the League.</p>
+
+<p>Let us first consider the Organisation of the
+League. Hitherto the body of civilised States
+which form the Family of Nations and which, as
+I pointed out in my first lecture, is really a League
+of Nations evolved by custom, has been an unorganised
+Community. This means that, although
+there are plenty of legal rules for the intercourse
+of the several States one with another, the Community
+of civilised States does not possess any
+permanently established organs or agents for the
+conduct of its common affairs. At present these
+affairs, if they are peaceably settled, are either
+settled by ordinary diplomatic negotiation or, if
+the matter is pressing and of the greatest importance,
+by temporarily convened International Conferences
+or Congresses.</p>
+
+<p>II. It is true there are the so-called Great Powers
+which are the leaders of the Family of Nations, and
+it is therefore asserted by some authorities that the
+Community of States has acquired a certain amount
+of organisation because the Great Powers are the
+legally recognised superiors of the minor States.</p>
+
+<p>But is this assertion correct? The Great Powers,
+are they really the legally recognised superiors of
+the minor States?</p>
+
+<p>I deny it. A Great Power is any large-sized
+State possessing a large population which gains
+such economic, military, and naval strength that<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</a></span>
+its political influence must be reckoned with by
+all the other Powers. At the time of the outbreak
+of the World War eight States had to be considered
+as Great Powers, namely Great Britain, Austria-Hungary,
+France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the
+United States of America, and Japan. But it is
+very probable that the end of the World War will
+see the number of Great Powers reduced to six.
+The collapse and break up of Russia has surely for
+the present eliminated her from the number of Great
+Powers. And it is quite certain that Austria-Hungary
+will not emerge from the struggle as a
+Great Power, if she emerges from it as a whole at
+all. History teaches that the number of the Great
+Powers is by no means stable, and changes occasionally
+take place. Look at the condition of affairs
+during the nineteenth century. Whereas at the
+time of the Vienna Congress in 1815 eight States,
+namely Great Britain, Austria, France, Portugal,
+Prussia, Spain, Sweden, and Russia were still considered
+Great Powers, their number soon decreased
+to five, because Portugal, Spain, and Sweden ceased
+to be Great Powers. On the other hand, Italy
+joined the number of the Great Powers after her
+unification in 1860; the United States of America
+joined the Great Powers after the American Civil
+War in 1865; and Japan emerged as a Great Power
+from her war with China in 1895.</p>
+
+<p>Be that as it may, so much is certain, a State
+is a Great Power not by law but only by its political
+influence. The Great Powers are the leaders of the
+Family of Nations because their political influence<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</a></span>
+is so great. Their political and economic influence
+is in the long run irresistible; therefore all arrangements
+made by the Great Powers naturally in most
+cases gain, either at once or in time, the consent
+of the minor States. It may be said that the
+Great Powers exercise a kind of political hegemony
+within the Family of Nations. Yet this hegemony
+is not based on law, it is simply a political fact, and
+it is certainly not a consequence of an organisation
+of the Family of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>III. The demand for a proper organisation of
+the Community of States had, up to the outbreak
+of the World War, been raised exclusively on the
+part of the so-called Pacifists in order to make the
+abolition of war a possibility. It is a common
+assertion on the part of the Pacifists that War cannot
+die out so long as there is no Central Political
+Authority in existence above the several States
+which could compel them to bring their disputes
+before an International Court and also compel them
+to carry out the judgments of such a Court. For
+this reason many Pacifists aim at such an organisation
+of the Community of States as would bring all
+the civilised States of the world within the bonds
+of a federation. They demand a World Federation
+of all the civilised States, or at any rate a federation
+of the States of Europe, on the model of the
+United States of America.</p>
+
+<p>If such a Federal World State were practically
+possible, there would be no objection to it, although
+International Law as such would cease to exist and
+be replaced by the Constitutional Law of this Federal<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</a></span>
+World State. But in my first lecture I pointed
+out that such a Federal World State is practically
+impossible. And it is not even desirable.</p>
+
+<p>The development of mankind would seem in
+the main to be indissolubly connected with the
+national development of the peoples. Most peoples
+possessing a strong national consciousness desire an
+independent State in which they can live according
+to their own ideals. They want to be their own
+masters, and not to be part and parcel of a Federal
+World State to which they would have to surrender
+a great part of their independence. Moreover&mdash;as I
+likewise pointed out in my first lecture (pp. <a href="#Page_18">18-20</a>)&mdash;it
+would be impossible to establish a strong
+Government and a strong Parliament in a Federal
+World State.</p>
+
+<p>However this may be, it is not at all certain that
+war would altogether disappear in a Federal World
+State. The history of Federal States teaches that
+wars do occasionally break out between their member
+States. Think of the war between the Roman
+Catholic and the Protestant member States of the
+Swiss Confederation in 1847, of the war in 1863
+between the Northern and the Southern member
+States within the Federation which is called the
+United States of America, and of the war between
+Prussia and Austria within the German Confederation
+in 1866.</p>
+
+<p>IV. But what kind of organisation of the League
+of Nations is possible if we reject the idea of a Federal
+State?</p>
+
+<p>Neither I, nor anyone else who does not like to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[33]</a></span>
+build castles in the air, can answer this question
+directly by making a detailed proposal. It is at
+present quite impossible to work out a practical
+scheme according to which a more detailed organisation
+of the League of Nations could be realised.
+But so much is certain that every attempt at
+organising this League must start from, and must
+keep intact, the independence and the equality of
+all civilised States. It is for this reason that a
+Central Political Authority above the sovereign
+States can never be thought of. Every attempt
+to organise a League of Nations on the model of a
+Federal State is futile. If a detailed organisation
+of the League should ever come, it will be one <i>sui
+generis</i>, one absolutely of its own kind; such as
+has never been seen before. And it is at present
+quite impossible to map out a detailed plan of such
+an organisation although, as I shall have to show
+you later, the first step towards an organisation
+has already been made, and further steps towards
+the ideal can be taken. The reason that it is at
+present impossible is that the growth and the final
+shape of the organisation of the League of Nations
+will, and must, go hand in hand with the progress
+of International Law. But the progress of International
+Law is conditioned by the growth, the
+strengthening, and the deepening of international
+economic and other interests, and of international
+morality. It is a matter of course that this progress
+can only be realised very slowly, for there is concerned
+a process of development through many
+generations and perhaps through centuries, a development<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[34]</a></span>
+whose end no one can foresee. It is sufficient
+for us to state that the development had already
+begun before the World War, and to try to foster
+it, as far as is in our power, after the conclusion
+of peace.</p>
+
+<p>V. I said that this development has begun.
+Where is this beginning of the development to be
+found?</p>
+
+<p>It is to be found in the establishment of the Permanent
+Court of Arbitration at the Hague and the
+Office therewith connected. The Permanent Court
+of Arbitration is not an institution of the several
+States, but an institution of the Community of
+States in contradistinction to its several members.
+Had the International Prize Court agreed upon by
+the Second Hague Peace Conference of 1907 been
+established, there would have come into existence
+another institution of the Community of States.</p>
+
+<p>But the establishment of International Courts
+would not justify the assertion that thereby the
+Community of States has turned from an unorganised
+community into an organised community. To
+reach this goal another step is required, namely an
+agreement amongst the Powers, according to which
+the Hague Peace Conferences would be made a
+permanent institution which periodically, within
+fixed intervals, assemble without being convened
+by one Power or another. If this were done, we
+could say that the hitherto unorganised Community
+of States had turned into an organised League of
+Nations, for by such periodically assembling Hague
+Peace Conferences there would be established an<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[35]</a></span>
+organ for the conduct of all such international
+matters as require international legislation or other
+international action.</p>
+
+<p>However that may be, the organisation created
+by the fact that the Hague Peace Conferences
+periodically assembled, would only be an immature
+one; more steps would be necessary in order that
+the organisation of the Community of States might
+become more perfect and more efficient. Yet progress
+would be slow, for every attempt at a progressive
+step meets with opposition, and it would be only
+when the <i>international</i> interests of the civilised States
+become victorious over their particular <i>national</i>
+interests that the Community of States would
+gradually receive a more perfect organisation.</p>
+
+<p>VI. There is no doubt that the experiences of
+mankind during the World War have been quickening
+development more than could have been
+expected in normal times. The universal demand
+for a new League of Nations accepting the principles
+that every judicial dispute amongst nations must
+be settled by International Courts and that every
+political dispute must, before the parties resort to
+arms, be brought before a Council of Conciliation,
+demonstrates clearly that the Community of States
+must now deliberately give itself some kind of
+organisation, because without it the principles just
+mentioned cannot be realised.</p>
+
+<p>Now a number of schemes for the organisation of
+a new League of Nations have been made public.
+They all agree upon the three aims of the League
+and the three rules for the realisation of these aims<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[36]</a></span>
+which I mentioned in my first lecture, namely compulsory
+settlement of all judicial disputes by International
+Courts of Justice, compulsory mediation
+in cases of political disputes by an International
+Council of Conciliation, and the duty of the members
+of the League to turn against any one member
+which should resort to arms in violation of the
+principles laid down by the League. However,
+these schemes differ very much with regard to the
+<i>organisation</i> of the League. I cannot now discuss
+the various schemes in detail. It must suffice to
+say that some of them embody proposals for a more
+or less state-like organisation and are therefore not
+acceptable to those who share my opinion that any
+state-like organisation of the League is practically
+impossible. But though some of the schemes, as
+for instance that of Lord Bryce and that of Sir
+Willoughby Dickinson, avoid this mistake, none of
+them take as their starting point that which I
+consider to be the right one, namely the beginning
+made at the two Hague Peace Conferences. <i>In my
+opinion the organisation of a new League of Nations
+should start from the beginning made by the two Hague
+Peace Conferences.</i></p>
+
+<p>VII. However, there is much objection to this,
+because it would necessitate the admission into
+the new League of all those States which took part
+in the Second Hague Peace Conference, including,
+of course, the Central Powers. The objections to
+such a wide range of the League are two-fold.</p>
+
+<p>In the first instance, the admission of the Central
+Powers, and especially of Germany, into the League<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[37]</a></span>
+is deprecated. By her attack on Belgium at the
+outbreak of the war, and by her general conduct
+of the war, Germany has deliberately taken up an
+attitude which proves that, when her military
+interests are concerned, she does not consider herself
+bound by any treaty, by any rule of law, or by
+any principle of humanity. How can we expect
+that she will carry out the engagements into which
+she might enter by becoming a member of the League
+of Nations?</p>
+
+<p>My answer is that, provided she be utterly defeated
+and no peace of compromise be made with her,
+militarism in Germany will be doomed, the reparation
+to be exacted from her for the many cruel wrongs
+must lead to a change of Constitution and Government,
+and this change of Constitution and Government
+will make Germany a more acceptable member
+of a new League of Nations. The utter defeat of
+Germany is a necessary preliminary condition to
+the possibility of her entrance into a League of
+Nations. Those who speak of the foundation of a
+League of Nations as a means of ending the World
+War by a peace of compromise with Germany are
+mistaken. The necessary presuppositions of such a
+League are entirely incompatible with an unbroken
+Prussian militarism.</p>
+
+<p>But while her utter defeat is the necessary preliminary
+condition to her entrance into a League of
+Nations, the inclusion of Germany in the League,
+after her utter defeat, is likewise a necessity. The
+reason is that, as I pointed out in my first lecture
+(p. <a href="#Page_17">17</a>), in case the Central Powers were excluded<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[38]</a></span>
+from the League, they would enter into a League
+of their own, and the world would then be divided
+into two rival camps, in the same way as before the
+war the Triple Alliance was faced by the Entente.
+<i>The world would be proved not ripe for a new League
+of Nations if peace were concluded with an undefeated
+Germany; and the League would miss its purpose if
+to a defeated and repenting Germany entrance into it
+were refused.</i></p>
+
+<p>VIII. In the second instance, the entrance of the
+great number of minor transoceanic States into
+the League is deprecated because these States would
+claim an equal vote with the European Powers and
+thereby obstruct progress within the League.</p>
+
+<p>It is asserted that some of the minor transatlantic
+States made the discussions at the Hague Conferences
+futile by their claim to an equal vote. Now
+it is true that some of these States have to a certain
+extent impeded the work of the Hague Conferences,
+but some of the minor States of Europe, and even
+some of the Great Powers, have done likewise.
+The Community of States consisting of sovereign
+States does not possess any means of compelling a
+minority of States to fall in with the views of the
+majority, but I shall show you very soon, when I
+approach the problem of International Legislation,
+that International Legislation of a kind is possible
+in spite of this fact. And so much is certain that
+the minimum of organisation of the new League
+which is now necessary, cannot be considered to
+be endangered by the admittance of the minor
+transoceanic States into the League. Progress will<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[39]</a></span>
+in any case be slow, and perfect unanimity among
+the Powers will in any and every case only be possible
+where the <i>international</i> interests of all the Powers
+compel them to put aside their real or imaginary
+particular <i>national</i> interests.</p>
+
+<p>IX. For these reasons I take it for granted that
+the organisation of a new League of Nations should
+start from the beginning made by the Hague Peace
+Conferences. Therefore the following seven principles
+ought to be accepted:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>First principle: The League of Nations is
+composed of all civilised States which recognise
+one another's external and internal independence
+and absolute equality before International Law.</p>
+
+<p>Second principle: The chief organ of the
+League is the Peace Conference at the Hague.
+The Peace Conferences meet periodically&mdash;say
+every two or three years&mdash;without being convened
+by any special Power. Their task is the
+gradual codification of International Law and
+the agreement upon such International Conventions
+as are from time to time necessitated
+by new circumstances and conditions.</p>
+
+<p>Third principle: A permanent Council of
+the Conference is to be created, the members
+of which are to be resident at the Hague and
+are to conduct all the current business of the
+League of Nations. This current business
+comprises: The preparation of the meetings
+of the Peace Conference; the conduct of communications
+with the several members of the
+League with regard to the preparation of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[40]</a></span>
+work of the Peace Conferences; and all other
+matters of international interest which the
+Conference from time to time hands over to
+the Council.</p>
+
+<p>Fourth principle: Every recognised sovereign
+State has a right to take part in the Peace
+Conferences.</p>
+
+<p>Fifth principle: Resolutions of the Conference
+can come into force only in so far as they become
+ratified by the several States concerned. On
+the other hand, every State agrees once for all
+faithfully to carry out those resolutions which
+have been ratified by it.</p>
+
+<p>Sixth principle: Every State that takes
+part in the Peace Conferences is bound only
+by such resolutions of the Conferences as it
+expressly agrees to and ratifies. Resolutions of a
+majority only bind the majority. On the other
+hand, no State has a right to demand that
+only such resolutions as it agrees to shall be
+adopted.</p>
+
+<p>Seventh principle: All members of the
+League of Nations agree once for all to submit
+all judicial disputes to International Courts
+which are to be set up, and to abide by their
+judgments. They likewise agree to submit,
+previous to resorting to arms, all non-judicial
+disputes to International Councils of Conciliation
+which are to be set up. And they all
+agree to unite their economic, military, and
+naval forces against any one or more States
+which resort to arms without submitting their<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[41]</a></span>
+disputes to International Courts of Justice or
+International Councils of Conciliation.</p></div>
+
+<p>You will have noticed that my proposals do not
+comprise the creation of an International Government,
+an International Executive, an International
+Parliament, and an International Army and Navy
+which would serve as an International Police Force.
+No one can look into the future and say what it will
+bring, but it is certain that for the present, and for
+some generations to come, all attempts at creating
+an International Government are not only futile
+but dangerous; because it is almost certain that
+a League of Nations comprising an International
+Executive, an International Parliament, and an
+International Army and Navy would soon collapse.</p>
+
+<p>X. However this may be, and whatever may be
+the details of the organisation of the League, such
+necessary organisation is not an end in itself but a
+means of attaining three objects, namely: International
+Legislation, International Administration
+of Justice, and International Mediation. I shall
+discuss International Administration of Justice and
+International Mediation in my next lecture, to-day
+I will only draw your attention to International
+Legislation.</p>
+
+<p>In using the term 'International Legislation,'
+it must be understood that 'legislation' is here
+to be understood in a figurative sense only. When
+we speak of legislation in everyday language, we
+mean that process of parliamentary activity by
+which Municipal Statutes are called into existence.
+Municipal Legislation presupposes a sovereign power,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[42]</a></span>
+which prescribes rules of conduct to its subjects.
+It is obvious that within the Community of States
+no such kind of legislation can take place. Rules of
+conduct for the members of the League of Nations
+can only be created by an agreement amongst those
+members. Whereas Municipal Statutes contain the
+rules of conduct set by an authority sovereign over
+its subjects, International Statutes&mdash;if I may be
+allowed to use that term&mdash;contain rules of conduct
+which the members of the Community of States
+have agreed to set for themselves. International
+Statutes are created by the so-called Law-making
+Treaties of the Powers. But in one point Municipal
+Legislation and the Law-making Treaties of the
+Powers resemble one another very closely:&mdash;both
+intend to create law, and for this reason it is permissible
+to use the term 'International Legislation'
+figuratively for the conclusion of such international
+treaties as contain rules of International Law.</p>
+
+<p>Now it would be very misleading to believe that
+no International Legislation has taken place in
+the past. The fact is that, from the Vienna Congress
+of 1815 onwards, agreements have been arrived at
+upon a number of rules of International Law. However,
+such agreements have only occurred occasionally,
+because the Community of civilised States
+has not hitherto possessed a permanently established
+organ for legislating. Much of the legislation which
+has taken place in the past was only a by-product
+of Congresses or Conferences which had assembled
+for other purposes. On the other hand, when legislation
+on a certain subject was considered pressing,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[43]</a></span>
+a Congress or Conference was convened for that
+very purpose. It will be only when the Hague
+Peace Conferences have become permanently established
+that an organ of the League of Nations for
+legislating internationally will be at hand. And
+a wide field is open for such legislation. The bulk
+of International Law in its present state is&mdash;if I
+may say so&mdash;a book law, it is customary law which
+is only to be found in text-books of International
+Law; it is, as regards many points, controversial;
+it has many gaps; and it is in many ways uncertain.
+International Legislation will be able gradually
+to create international statutes which will turn
+this book law into firm, clear, and authoritative
+statutory law.</p>
+
+<p>XI. But you must not imagine that International
+Legislation is an easy matter. It is in fact full of
+difficulties of all kinds. I will only mention four:</p>
+
+<p>There is, firstly, the language question. Since it
+is impossible to draft International Statutes in all
+languages, it is absolutely necessary to agree upon
+one language, and this language at present is, as
+you all know, French. Yet, difficult as the language
+question is, it is not insurmountable. It is hardly
+greater than the difficulty which arises when two
+States, which speak different languages, have to
+agree upon an ordinary convention. One point,
+however, must be specially observed, and that is:
+when any question of the interpretation of an International
+Statute occurs, it is the French text of the
+statute which is authoritative, and not the text of
+the translation into other languages.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[44]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>XII. Another difficulty with regard to International
+Legislation is the conflicting <i>national</i> interests
+of the different States. As International Statutes
+are only possible when the several States come to
+an agreement, it will often not be possible to legislate
+internationally on a given matter, because the
+interests of the different States will be so conflicting
+that an agreement cannot be arrived at. On the
+other hand, as time goes on the international interests
+of the several States frequently become so powerful
+that these Governments are quite ready to brush
+aside their particular interests, and to agree upon a
+compromise which makes International Legislation
+concerning the matter in question possible.</p>
+
+<p>XIII. A third difficulty with regard to International
+Legislation is of quite a particular kind.
+It arises from the fact that International Statutes
+cannot be created by a vote of the majority of States,
+but only by a unanimous vote of all the members
+of the Community of civilised States.</p>
+
+<p>This difficulty, however, can be overcome by
+dropping the contention that no legislation of any
+kind can be proceeded with unless every member
+of the League of Nations agrees to it. It is a well-known
+fact that a distinction has to be made between
+<i>universal</i> International Law, that is, rules to which
+every civilised State agrees, and <i>general</i> International
+Law, that is, rules to which only the greater
+number of States agree. Now it is quite certain
+that no universal International Law can be created
+by legislation to which not every member of the
+League of Nations has agreed. Nothing, however,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[45]</a></span>
+ought to prevent those States which are ready to
+agree to certain new rules of International Law, from
+legislating <i>for their own number</i> on a certain matter.
+If such legislation is really of value, the time will
+come when the dissenting States will gradually
+accede. The Second Hague Peace Conference acted
+on this principle, for a good many of its Conventions
+were only agreed upon by the greater number, and
+not by all, of the participating States.</p>
+
+<p>XIV. A fourth difficulty with regard to International
+Legislation is the difficulty of the interpretation
+of, and the construction to be put upon, International
+Statutes as well as ordinary international
+conventions. We do not as yet possess universally
+recognised rules of International Law concerning
+such interpretation and construction. Each nation
+applies to International Statutes those rules of
+interpretation and construction which are valid for
+the interpretation and construction of their Municipal
+Statutes.</p>
+
+<p>Many international disputes have been due in
+the past to this difficulty of interpretation and construction.
+A notorious example is that of the
+interpretation of Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations
+of 1907 concerning Land Warfare, which lays
+down the rule that it is forbidden 'to declare
+abolished, suspended, or inadmissible in a Court of
+Law the rights and actions of the nationals of the
+hostile party.'</p>
+
+<p>Germany and other continental States interpret
+this article to mean that the Municipal Law of a
+State is not allowed to declare that the outbreak<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[46]</a></span>
+of war suspends or avoids contracts with alien
+enemies, or that war prevents alien enemies from
+bringing an action in the Courts.</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, England and the United
+States of America interpret this article to mean
+merely that the <i>occupant of enemy territory</i> is prohibited
+from declaring abolished, suspended, or inadmissible
+in a Court of Law the rights and actions
+of the nationals of the hostile party.</p>
+
+<p>What is the cause of this divergent interpretation
+of an article, the literal meaning of which seems to
+be quite clear? The divergence is due to the different
+mode of interpretation of statutes resorted to by
+continental Courts, on the one hand, and, on the
+other hand, by British and American Courts.</p>
+
+<p>Continental Courts take into consideration not
+only the literal meaning of a clause of a statute,
+but also the intention of the legislator as evidenced
+by&mdash;what I should like to call&mdash;the history of the
+clause. They look for the intention of the draftsman,
+they search the Parliamentary proceedings concerning
+the clause, and they interpret and construe the
+clause with regard to the intention of the draftsman
+as well as to the proceedings in Parliament.</p>
+
+<p>Now Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations was
+inserted on the motion of the German delegates to
+the Second Hague Peace Conference, and there is
+no doubt that the German delegates intended by
+its insertion to prevent the Municipal Law of belligerents
+from possessing a rule according to which
+the outbreak of war suspends or avoids contracts
+with alien enemies, and prohibits alien enemies from<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[47]</a></span>
+bringing an action in the Courts. It is for this
+reason that Germany and other continental States
+interpret Article 23(h) according to the intention
+of the German delegates.</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, in interpreting and construing
+a clause of a statute, British and American Courts
+refuse to take into consideration the intention of
+the draftsman, Parliamentary discussions concerning
+the clause, and the like. They only take into
+consideration the literal meaning of the clause as it
+stands in the statute of which it is a part. Now
+Article 23(h) is a clause in the Convention concerning
+the Laws and Customs of War on Land. It is one
+of several paragraphs of Article 23 which comprises
+the prohibition of a number of acts by the armed
+forces of belligerents in warfare on land, such as
+the employment of poison or poisoned arms, and
+the like. The British and American delegates,
+believing that it only concerned an act on the part
+of belligerent forces occupying enemy territory,
+therefore consented to the insertion of Article 23(h),
+and our Court of Appeal&mdash;in the case of Porter <i>v.</i>
+Freundenberg (1915)&mdash;held that Article 23(h) is to
+be interpreted in that sense.<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p>
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[48]</a></span></p>
+<p>Be that as it may, the difficulty of interpretation
+and construction of international treaties will exist
+so long as no International Statute has been agreed
+upon which lays down detailed rules concerning
+interpretation and construction, or so long as International
+Courts have not developed such rules in
+practice. But the problem of International Courts
+is itself a very difficult one; it will be the subject
+of my third lecture which will deal with Administration
+of Justice and Mediation within the League
+of Nations.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> By a letter of February 28, 1911, I drew the attention of the
+Foreign Office to the interpretation of Article 23(h) which generally
+prevailed on the Continent. This letter and the answer I received
+were privately printed, and copies were distributed amongst those
+members and associates of the Institute of International Law who
+attended the meeting at Madrid. Since French, German, and
+Italian International Law Journals published translations, but the
+original of the correspondence was never published in this country,
+I think it advisable to append it to this lecture.</p></div>
+
+<h3>APPENDIX</h3>
+
+<p class="center">CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE FOREIGN
+OFFICE RESPECTING THE INTERPRETATION<br />
+OF ARTICLE 23(h) OF THE
+HAGUE REGULATIONS CONCERNING
+LAND WARFARE</p>
+
+<h4>LETTER FROM THE PRESENT WRITER TO THE
+FOREIGN OFFICE.</h4>
+
+<div class="bk2"><p class="p5"><span class="smcap">Whewell House, Cambridge</span>,</p>
+<p class="td2"><i>28th February, 1911</i>.</p></div>
+
+<p class="p2"><span class="smcap">To<br />
+The Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.</span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Sir</span>,&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>I venture to bring the following matter before your
+consideration:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>In the course of my recent studies I have been dealing with the
+laws and usages of war on land, and I have had to consider the
+interpretation of Article 23(h) of the Regulations attached to the
+Convention of 1907 relating to the Laws and Customs of war on
+land. I find that the interpretation prevailing among all continental
+and some English and American authorities is contrary<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[49]</a></span>
+to the old English rule, and I would respectfully ask to be informed
+of the view which His Majesty's Government place upon the article
+in question.</p>
+
+<p>To give some idea as to how an interpretation of Article 23(h)
+contrary to the old English rule prevails generally, I will quote
+a number of French, German, English, and American writers, the
+works of whom I have at hand in my library, and I will also quote
+the German <i>Weissbuch</i> concerning the results of the second Hague
+Conference of 1907.</p>
+
+<p>Bonfils, <i>Manuel de droit international public</i>, 5th ed. by Fauchille,
+1908, discusses, on page 651, the doctrine which denies to an enemy
+subject any <i>persona standi in judicio</i>, but adds:&mdash;'... Article
+23(h) d&eacute;cide qu'il est interdit de d&eacute;clarer &eacute;teints, suspendus ou
+non recevables en justice, les droits et actions des nationaux de la
+partie adverse.'</p>
+
+<p>Politis, Professor of International Law in the University of Poitiers
+(France), in his report to the Institute of International Law, Session
+of Paris (1910), concerning <i>Effets de la Guerre sur les Obligations
+Internationales et les Contrats priv&eacute;s</i>, page 18, says:</p>
+
+<p>'Un point hors de doute, c'est, que la guerre ne peut, ni par
+elle-m&ecirc;me ni par la volont&eacute; des bellig&eacute;rants, affecter la validit&eacute; ou
+l'ex&eacute;cution des contrats ant&eacute;rieurs. Cette r&egrave;gle fait d&eacute;sormais
+partie du droit positif. L'article 23(h) du nouveau R&egrave;glement
+de la Haye interdit formellement aux bellig&eacute;rants "de d&eacute;clarer
+&eacute;teints, suspendus ou non recevables en justice les droits et actions
+des nationaux de la partie adverse."</p>
+
+<p>'Cette formule condamne d'anciens usages conserv&eacute;s encore,
+en partie, dans certains pays. Elle proscrit d'abord tous les moyens&mdash;annulation
+ou confiscation&mdash;par lesquels on chercherait &agrave; atteindre,
+dans leur existence, les droits n&eacute;s avant la guerre. Elle exclut,
+en second lieu, l'ancienne pratique qui interdisait aux particuliers
+ennemis l'acc&egrave;s des tribunaux. Elle prohibe, enfin, toutes les
+mesures l&eacute;gislatives ou autres tendant &agrave; entraver au cours de la
+guerre l'ex&eacute;cution ou les effets utiles des obligations priv&eacute;es,
+notamment le cours des int&eacute;r&ecirc;ts.</p>
+
+<p>'Il y a l&agrave; progr&egrave;s incontestable. Et l'on doit &ecirc;tre reconnaissant
+&agrave; la d&eacute;l&eacute;gation allemande &agrave; la 2e Conf&eacute;rence de la paix de l'avoir
+provoqu&eacute;.</p>
+
+<p>'L'accueil empress&eacute; et unanime qu'a re&ccedil;u cette heureuse initiative
+permet d'esp&eacute;rer que de nouveaux progr&egrave;s pourront &ecirc;tre r&eacute;alis&eacute;s
+dans cet ordre d'id&eacute;es.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[50]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>'On doit souhaiter que la disposition de l'article 23(h), &eacute;trang&egrave;re
+&agrave; l'hypoth&egrave;se de l'occupation du territoire ennemi, soit distraite
+du r&egrave;glement de 1907 (comme les articles 57 &agrave; 60 l'ont &eacute;t&eacute; du R&egrave;glement
+de 1899) pour &ecirc;tre mieux plac&eacute;e dans une convention nouvelle,
+o&ugrave; d'autres textes viendraient la compl&eacute;ter.'</p>
+
+<p>Ullmann, <i>V&ouml;lkerrecht</i>, 2nd ed. 1908, p. 474, says:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>'Auch der Rechtsverkehr wird durch den Ausbruch des Krieges
+nicht unterbrochen oder gehemmt. Die nach Landesrecht frueher
+uebliche zeitweise Aufhebung der Klagbarkeit vom Schuldverbindlichkeiten
+des Staates oder eines Angeh&ouml;rigen gegen Angeh&ouml;rige
+des Feindes ist durch Artikel 23(h) untersagt.'</p>
+
+<p>Wehberg, <i>Das Beuterecht im Land- und Seekriege</i>, 1909, pp. 5
+and 6 says:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>'Article 46 Absatz 2 bestimmt:&mdash;"Das Privateigentum darf
+nicht eingezogen werden." In konsequenter Durchf&uuml;hrung dieses
+Satzes bestimmt der auf deutschen Antrag 1907 hinzugef&uuml;gte
+Article 23(h):&mdash;"Untersagt ist die Aufhebung oder zeitweilige
+Ausserkraftsetzung der Rechte und Forderungen von Angehoerigen
+der Gegenpartei oder der Ausschliessung ihrer Klagbarkeit."'</p>
+
+<p>Whittuck, <i>International Documents</i>, London 1908, Introduction
+p. xxvii, says&mdash;'In Article 23(h) it is prohibited to declare abolished,
+suspended or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions
+of the nationals of the other belligerent which is a development
+of the principle that the private property of the subjects of a belligerent
+is not subject to confiscation. This new prohibition if accepted
+by this country would necessitate some changes in our municipal
+law.'</p>
+
+<p>Holland, <i>The Laws of War on Land</i>, 1908, says on p. 5 that:&mdash;'Article
+23(h) seems to require the Signatory Powers to the convention
+concerned to legislate for the abolition of an enemy's disability
+to sustain a <i>persona standi in judicio</i>.' (See also Holland,
+<i>loco citato</i>, p. 44, where he expresses his doubts concerning the
+interpretation of Article 23(h).)</p>
+
+<p>Bordwell, <i>The Law of War between Belligerents</i>, Chicago 1908,
+recognises on page 210 the fact that according to Article 23(h) an
+alien enemy must now be allowed to sue in the courts of a belligerent,
+and</p>
+
+<p>Gregory, Professor in the University of Iowa, who reviews Bordwell's
+work in the <i>American Journal of International Law</i>, Volume 3
+(1909), page 788, takes up the same standpoint.</p>
+
+<p>The only author who interprets Article 23(h) in a different way<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[51]</a></span>
+is General Davis, who in his <i>Elements of International Law</i>, 3rd
+edition 1908, page 578, note 1, says:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>'It is more than probable that this humane and commendable
+purpose would fail of accomplishment if a military commander
+conceived it to be within his authority to suspend or nullify their
+operation, or to regard their application in certain cases as a matter
+falling within his administrative discretion. Especially is this
+true where a military officer refuses to receive well grounded complaints,
+or declines to receive demands for redress, in respect to the
+acts or conduct of the troops under his command, from persons
+subject to the jurisdiction of the enemy who find themselves, for
+the time being, in the territory which he holds in military occupation.
+To provide against such a contingency it was deemed wise to add an
+appropriate declaratory clause to the prohibition of Article 23.'</p>
+
+<p>It is very unfortunate that the book of General Davis is not at
+all known on the Continent, and that therefore none of the continental
+authors have any knowledge of the fact that a divergent
+interpretation from their own of Article 23(h) is being preferred
+by an American author.</p>
+
+<p>It is likewise very unfortunate that neither the English Bluebook
+on the Second Hague Peace Conference (see Parliamentary
+Papers, Miscellaneous No. 4, 1907, page 104) nor the official minutes
+of the proceedings of the Conference, edited by the Dutch Government,
+give any such information concerning the construction of
+Article 23(h) as could assist a jurist in forming an opinion regarding
+the correct interpretation.</p>
+
+<p>It is, however, of importance to take notice of the fact that Article
+23(h) is an addition to Article 23 which was made on the proposition
+of Germany, and that Germany prefers an interpretation of Article
+23(h) which would seem to coincide with the interpretation preferred
+by all the continental writers. This becomes clearly apparent
+from the German <i>Weissbuch ueber die Ergebnisse der im Jahre 1907
+in Haag abgehaltenen Friedensconferenz</i>, which contains on page 7
+the following:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>'Der Artikel 23 hat gleichfalls auf deutschen Antrag zwei wichtige
+Zus&auml;tze erhalten. Durch den ersten wird der Grundsatz der Unverletzlichkeit
+des Privateigenthumes auch auf dem Gebiete der Forderungsrechte
+anerkannt. Nach der Gesetzgebung einzelner Staaten
+soll n&auml;mlich der Krieg die Folge haben, dass die Schuldverbindlichkeiten
+des Staates oder seiner Angeh&ouml;rigen gegen Angeh&ouml;rige
+des Feindes aufgehoben oder zeitweilig ausser Kraft gesetzt oder<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[52]</a></span>
+wenigstens von der Klagbarkeit ausgeschlossen werden. Solche
+Vorschriften werden nun durch den Artikel 23 Abs. 1 unter h f&uuml;r
+unzul&auml;ssig erkl&auml;rt.'</p>
+
+<p>However this may be, the details given above show sufficiently
+that a divergent interpretation of Article 23(h) from the old English
+rule is prevalent on the Continent, and is to some extent also accepted
+by English and American Authorities, and it is for this reason that I
+would ask whether His Majesty's Government consider that the old
+English rule is no longer in force.</p>
+
+<p class="signing">I have, &amp;c.,<br />
+(Signed) L. OPPENHEIM.</p>
+
+<h4>LETTER FROM THE FOREIGN OFFICE TO THE
+PRESENT WRITER.</h4>
+
+<div class="bk2"><p class="p5"><span class="smcap">Foreign Office</span>,</p>
+<p class="td2"><i>March 27, 1911</i>.</p></div>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Sir</span>,&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to thank you
+for your letter of February 28th, and for drawing his attention
+to the misconceptions which appear to prevail so largely among
+the continental writers on international law with regard to the
+purport and effect of Article 23(h) of the Convention of October 18th,
+1907, respecting the laws and customs of war on land.</p>
+
+<p>It seems very strange that jurists of the standing of those from
+whose writings you quote could have attributed to the article in
+question the meaning and effect they have given it if they had
+studied the general scheme of the instrument in which it finds a
+place.</p>
+
+<p>The provision is inserted at the end of an article dealing with the
+prohibited modes of warfare. It forms part of Chapter I. of Section
+II. of the Regulations annexed to the Convention. The title of
+Chapter I. is 'Means of injuring the enemy, sieges and bombardment':
+and if the article itself is examined it will be seen to deal
+with such matters as employing poison or poisoned weapons, refusing
+quarter, use of treachery and the unnecessary destruction of private
+property. Similarly the following articles (24 to 28) all deal with
+the restrictions which the nations felt it incumbent upon them from<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[53]</a></span>
+a sense of humanity to place upon the conduct of their armed forces
+in the actual prosecution of military operations.</p>
+
+<p>The Regulation in which these articles figure is itself merely
+an annex to the Convention which alone forms the contractual
+obligation between the parties, and the engagement which the
+parties to the Convention have undertaken is (Article 1) to 'issue
+instructions to their armed land forces in conformity with the
+Regulations respecting the Law and Customs of war on land.'</p>
+
+<p>This makes it abundantly clear that the purpose and scope of
+the Regulations is limited to the proceedings of the armies in the
+field; those armies are under the orders of the commanders, and
+the Governments are bound to issue instructions to those commanders
+to act in accordance with the Regulations. That is all. There is
+nothing in the Convention or in the Regulations dealing with the
+rights or the status of the non-combatant individuals, whether of
+enemy nationality or domiciled in enemy territory. They are, of
+course, if inhabitants of the theatre of war, affected by the provisions
+of the Regulations because they are individuals who are
+affected by the military operations, and in a sense a regulation which
+forbids a military commander from poisoning a well gives a non-combatant
+inhabitant a right or a quasi-right not to have his well
+poisoned, but his rights against his neighbours, his relations with
+private individuals, whether of his own or of enemy nationality,
+remain untouched by this series of rules for the conduct of warfare
+on land.</p>
+
+<p>Turning now to the actual wording of Article 23(h) it will be
+seen that it begins with the wording 'to declare.' It is particularly
+forbidden 'to <i>declare</i> abolished, &amp;c.' This wording necessarily
+contemplates the issue of some proclamation or notification purporting
+to abrogate or to change rights previously existing and
+which would otherwise have continued to exist, and in view of
+Article I of the Convention this hypothetical proclamation must have
+been one which it was assumed the commander of the army would
+issue; consequently, stated broadly, the effect of Article 23(h) is
+that a commander in the field is forbidden to attempt to terrorise
+the inhabitants of the theatre of war by depriving them of existing
+opportunities of obtaining relief to which they are entitled in respect
+of private claims.</p>
+
+<p>Sir E. Grey is much obliged to you for calling his attention to
+the extract which you quote from the German White Book. This
+extract may be translated as follows:&mdash;'Article 23 has also received<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[54]</a></span>
+on German proposal two weighty additions. By the first the fundamental
+principle of the inviolability of private property in the
+domain of legal claims is recognised. According to the legislation
+of individual states, war has the result of extinguishing or temporarily
+suspending, or at least of suppressing the liability of the state or its
+nationals to be sued by nationals of the enemy. These prescriptions
+have now been declared inadmissible by Article 23(h).'</p>
+
+<p>The original form of the addition to Article 23 which the German
+delegates proposed was as follows: 'de d&eacute;clarer &eacute;teintes, suspendues
+ou non recevables les r&eacute;clamations priv&eacute;es de ressortissants de la
+Partie adverse' (see proc&egrave;s-verbal of the 2nd meeting of the 1st
+sub-Committee of the 2nd Committee, 10th July, 1907).</p>
+
+<p>There is nothing to show that any explanation was vouchsafed
+to the effect that the proposed addition to the article was intended
+to mean more than its wording necessarily implied, though there
+is a statement by one of the German delegates in the proc&egrave;s-verbal
+of the 1st meeting of the 1st sub-Committee of the 2nd Committee,
+on July 3rd, which in all probability must have referred to this
+particular amendment, though the proc&egrave;s-verbal does not render
+it at all clear; nor is the statement itself free from ambiguity. An
+amendment was suggested and accepted at the second meeting to
+add the words 'en justice' after 'non recevables,' and in this form
+the sub-article was considered by an examining committee, was
+accepted and incorporated in Article 23, and brought before and
+accepted by the Conference in its 4th Plenary Sitting on the 17th
+August, 1907.</p>
+
+<p>The subsequent alteration in the wording must have been made
+by the Drafting Committee, but cannot have been considered to
+affect the substance of the provision, as in the 10th Plenary Sitting
+on October 17th, 1907, the reporter of the Drafting Committee,
+in dealing with the verbal amendments made in this Convention,
+merely said, 'En ce qui concerne le r&egrave;glement lui-m&ecirc;me, je n'appellerai
+pas votre attention sur les diff&eacute;rentes modifications de style sans
+importance que nous y avons introduites.'</p>
+
+<p>Nor is there anything to indicate any such far-reaching interpretation
+as the German White Book suggests in the report which
+accompanied the draft text of the Convention when it was brought
+before the Plenary Sitting of the Conference (Annex A. to 4th
+Plenary Sitting). It merely states that the addition is regarded as
+embodying in very happy terms a consequence of the principles
+accepted in 1899.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[55]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>The result appears to Sir E. Grey to be that neither the wording
+nor the context nor the circumstances attending the introduction
+of the provision which now figures as Article 23(h) support the
+interpretation which the writers you quote place upon it and which
+the German White Book endorses.</p>
+
+<p>Sir E. Grey notices that, in the extract you quote, Monsieur
+Politis, after placing his own interpretation upon the article, remarks
+that it is quite foreign to the hypothesis of the occupation
+of territory and ought to be removed from the Regulations and
+turned into a Convention by itself. If this interpretation were
+correct, this remark of Monsieur Politis is certainly true: but the
+fact that the provision appears where it does should have suggested
+to Monsieur Politis that it does not bear the interpretation he puts
+upon it.</p>
+
+<p>Nor does it appear to Sir E. Grey that the provision conflicts with
+the principle of the English common law that an enemy subject
+is not entitled to bring an action in the courts to sustain a contract,
+commerce with enemy subjects being illegal.</p>
+
+<p>That principle operates automatically on the outbreak of war,
+it requires no declaration by the Government, still less by a commander
+in the field, to bring it into operation. It is a principle
+which applies equally whether the war is being waged on land or
+sea, and which is applied in all the courts and not merely in those
+within the field of the operations of the military commanders.</p>
+
+<p>The whole question of the effect of war upon the commerce of
+private persons may require reconsideration in the future; the old
+rules may be scarcely consistent with the requirements or the conditions
+of modern commerce; but a modification of those rules is
+not one to which His Majesty's Government could be a party except
+after careful enquiry and consideration, and, when made at all,
+it must be done by a convention that applies to war both on land
+and sea.</p>
+
+<p>They certainly have not become parties to any such modification
+by agreeing to a convention which relates only to the instructions
+they are to give the commanders of their armed forces, and which
+is limited to war on land.</p>
+
+<p class="signing">I am, &amp;c.,<br />
+(Signed) F. A. CAMPBELL.</p>
+
+<hr /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[57]</a></span></p>
+<h2><span class="smcap">Third Lecture</span><br />
+ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND MEDIATION
+WITHIN THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS</h2>
+
+<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[59]</a></span></p>
+<h3>SYNOPSIS</h3>
+
+<div class="fss"><p>I. Administration of Justice within the League is a question of
+International Courts, but it is incorrect to assert that International
+Legislation necessitates the existence of International Courts.</p>
+
+<p>II. The Permanent Court of Arbitration created by the First
+Hague Peace Conference.</p>
+
+<p>III. The difficulties connected with International Administration
+of Justice by International Courts.</p>
+
+<p>IV. The necessity for a Court of Appeal above the International
+Court of First Instance.</p>
+
+<p>V. The difficulties connected with the setting up of International
+Courts of Justice.</p>
+
+<p>VI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself because it
+distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several Benches
+which would be called upon to decide the cases.</p>
+
+<p>VII. The advantages of the recommended scheme.</p>
+
+<p>VIII. A necessary provision for so-called complex cases of dispute.</p>
+
+<p>IX. A necessary provision with regard to the notorious clause
+<i>rebus sic stantibus</i>.</p>
+
+<p>X. The two starting points for a satisfactory proposal concerning
+International Mediation by International Councils of Conciliation.
+Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning Pacific Settlement
+of International disputes. The Permanent International Commissions
+of the Bryan Peace Treaties.</p>
+
+<p>XI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself for the establishment
+of International Councils of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>XII. The question of disarmament.</p>
+
+<p>XIII. The assertion that States renounce their sovereignty by
+entering into the League.</p>
+
+<p>XIV. Conclusion: Can it be expected that, in case of a great
+conflict of interests, all the members of the League will faithfully
+carry out their engagements?</p></div><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[60]</a></span></p>
+
+<h3>THE LECTURE</h3>
+
+<p>I. My last lecture dealt with the organisation of
+a League of Nations and International Legislation
+by the League. To-day I want to draw your attention
+to International Administration of Justice and
+International Mediation within the League.</p>
+
+<p>I begin with International Administration of
+Justice which, of course, is a question of International
+Courts of Justice. Hitherto, although
+International Legislation has been to some extent
+in existence, no International Courts have been
+established before which States in dispute have
+been compelled to appear. Now there is no doubt
+that International Legislation loses in value if there
+are no arrangements for International Administration
+of Justice by independent and permanent
+International Courts. Yet it is incorrect to assert,
+although it is frequently done, that one may not
+speak of legislation and a law created by legislation
+without the existence of Courts to administer such
+law.</p>
+
+<p>Why is this assertion incorrect? Because the
+function of Courts is to decide <i>controversial</i> questions
+of law or of fact in case the respective parties cannot
+agree concerning them. However, in most cases
+the law is not in jeopardy, and its commands are
+carried out by those concerned without any necessity
+for a Court to declare the law. Modern International
+Law has been in existence for several hundred
+years, and its commands have in most cases been<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[61]</a></span>
+complied with in the absence of International Courts.
+On the other hand, there is no doubt that, if controversies
+arise about a question of law or a question
+of fact, the authority of the law can be successfully
+vindicated only by the verdict of a Court. And
+it is for this reason that no highly developed Community
+can exist for long without Courts of Justice.</p>
+
+<p>II. The Community of civilised States did not,
+until the end of the nineteenth century, possess any
+permanent institution which made the administration
+of international justice possible. When States
+were in conflict and, instead of having recourse to
+arms, resolved to have the dispute peaceably settled
+by an award, in every case they agreed upon so-called
+arbitration, and they nominated one or more
+arbitrators, whom they asked to give a verdict.
+For this reason, it was an epoch-making step forward
+when the First Peace Conference of 1899 agreed
+upon the institution of a Permanent Court of Arbitration,
+and a code of rules for the procedure before
+this Court. Although the term 'Permanent Court
+of Arbitration,' as applied to the institution
+established by the First Hague Peace Conference,
+is only a euphemism, since actually the Court concerned
+is not a permanent one and the members of
+the Court have in every case to be nominated by
+the parties, there is in existence, firstly, a permanent
+panel of persons from which the arbitrators may be
+selected; secondly, a permanent office at the Hague;
+and, thirdly, a code of procedure before the Court.
+Thereby an institution has been established which
+is always at hand in case the parties in conflict want<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[62]</a></span>
+to make use of it; whereas in former times parties
+in conflict had to negotiate a long time in order
+to set up the machinery for arbitration. And the
+short time of twenty years has fully justified
+the expectations aroused by the institution of the
+Permanent Court of Arbitration, for a good number
+of cases have been brought before it and settled to
+the satisfaction of the parties concerned.</p>
+
+<p>And the Second Hague Peace Conference of 1907
+contemplated further steps by agreeing upon a
+treaty concerning the establishment of an International
+Court of Appeal in Prize Cases, and upon
+a draft treaty concerning a really Permanent
+International Court of Justice side by side with
+the existing Court of Arbitration. Although neither
+of these contemplated International Courts has
+been established, there is no doubt that, if after
+the present war a League of Nations becomes a
+reality, one or more International Courts of Justice
+will surely be established, although the existing
+Permanent Court of Arbitration may remain in
+being.</p>
+
+<p>III. But just as regards International Legislation,
+I must warn you not to imagine that International
+Administration of Justice by International
+Courts is an easy matter. It is in fact full of
+difficulties of many kinds.</p>
+
+<p>The peculiar character of International Law;
+the rivalry between the different schools of international
+jurists, namely the Naturalists, Positivists,
+and Grotians; the question of language; the
+peculiarities of the systems of law of the different<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[63]</a></span>
+States, of their constitutions, and many other difficulties,
+entail the danger that International Courts
+may become the arena of national jealousies, of
+empty talk, and of political intrigues, instead
+of being pillars of international justice.</p>
+
+<p>Everything depends upon what principles will
+guide the States in their selection of the individuals
+whom they appoint as members of International
+Courts. Not diplomatists, not politicians, but only
+men ought to be appointed who have had a training
+in law in general, and in International Law in particular;
+men who are linguists, knowing, at any
+rate, the French language besides their own; men
+who possess independence of character and are free
+from national prejudices of every kind. There is
+no doubt that, under present conditions and circumstances
+of international life, the institution of International
+Courts represents an unheard of experiment.
+There is, however, likewise no doubt that <i>now</i> is
+the time for the experiment to be made, and I believe
+that the experiment will be successful, provided
+the several States are careful in the appointment of
+the judges.</p>
+
+<p>IV. And it must be emphasised that an International
+Court of Appeal above the one or several
+International Courts is a necessity. Just as Municipal
+Courts of Justice, so International Courts of
+Justice are not infallible. If the States are to be
+compelled to have their judicial disputes settled
+by International Administration of Justice, there
+must be a possibility of bringing an appeal from
+lower International Courts to a Higher Court. It is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[64]</a></span>
+only in this way that in time a body of International
+Case Law can grow up, which will be equivalent
+in its influence upon the practice of the States to
+the municipal case law of the different States.</p>
+
+<p>V. I have hitherto considered in a general way
+only the difficulties of International Administration
+of Justice; I have not touched upon the particular
+difficulties connected with the setting up and manning
+of International Courts. If the several States could
+easily agree upon, say, five qualified men as judges
+of a Court of First Instance, and upon, say, seven
+qualified men as judges of a Court of Appeal, there
+would be no difficulty whatever in setting up these
+two Courts. And perhaps some generations hence
+the time may come when such an agreement will
+be possible. In our time it cannot be expected,
+and here therefore lies the great difficulty in the
+way of setting up and manning International Courts
+of Justice; because there is no doubt that each State
+will claim the right to appoint at least one man of
+its own choice to sit as judge in the International
+Court or Courts. And since there are about fifty
+or more civilised independent States in existence,
+the International Court would comprise fifty or
+more members.</p>
+
+<p>Now why would the several States claim a right
+to appoint at least one man of their own choice as
+judge? They would do this because they desire
+to have a representative of their own general legal
+views in the Court. It is a well-known fact that
+not only the legal systems which prevail in the
+several States differ, but also that there are differences<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[65]</a></span>
+concerning the fundamental conceptions of justice,
+law, procedure, and evidence. Each State fears
+that an International Court will create a practice
+fundamentally divergent from its general legal
+views, unless there is at least one representative of
+its own general legal views sitting in the Court.</p>
+
+<p>I think that in spite of everything the difficulty
+is not insurmountable provided a scheme for an
+International Court which follows closely the model
+of Municipal Courts is not insisted upon. Just as
+the organisation of a League of Nations cannot follow
+the model of the organisation of a State, so the
+attempt to set up an International Court must not
+aim at following closely the model of Municipal
+Courts. What is required is an institution which
+secures the settlement of judicial international
+disputes by giving judgments on the basis of law.
+I think this demand can be satisfied by a scheme
+which would meet both the claim of each State
+to nominate one judge and the necessity not to
+overcrowd the Bench which decides each dispute.</p>
+
+<p>VI. The scheme which I should like to recommend
+is one which distinguishes between the Court as a
+whole and the several Benches which would be
+called upon to decide the several cases. It is as
+follows:</p>
+
+<p>The Court as a whole to consist of as many judges
+as there are members of the League, each member
+to appoint one judge and one deputy judge who
+would take the place of the judge in case of illness
+or death or other cause of absence. The President,
+the Vice-President, and, say, twelve or fourteen<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[66]</a></span>
+members to constitute the Permanent Bench of the
+Court and therefore to be resident the whole year
+round at the Hague. Half of the members of this
+Permanent Bench of the Court to be appointed by the
+Great Powers&mdash;each Great Power to appoint one&mdash;and
+the other half of the members to be appointed
+by the minor Powers. Perhaps the Scandinavian
+Powers might agree upon the nomination of one
+member; Holland and Spain and Portugal upon
+another; Belgium, Switzerland, and Luxemburg
+upon a third; the Balkan States upon a fourth;
+Argentina, Brazil, and Chile upon a fifth; and so on.
+Anyhow, some arrangement would have to be made
+according to which the minor Powers unite upon the
+appointment of half the number of the Permanent
+Bench.</p>
+
+<p>If a judicial dispute arises between two States,
+the case to go in the first instance before a Bench
+comprising the two judges appointed by the two
+States in dispute and a President who, as each case
+arises, is to be selected by the Permanent Bench
+of the Court from the members of this Bench. This
+Court of First Instance having given its judgment,
+each party to have a right of appeal. The appeal
+to go before the Permanent Bench at the Hague,
+which is to give judgment with a quorum of six
+judges with the addition of those judges who served
+as the Bench of First Instance. The right of appeal
+to exist only on questions of law and not on questions
+of fact.</p>
+
+<p>Decisions of the Appeal Court to be binding precedents
+for itself and for any Courts of First Instance.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[67]</a></span>
+But should the Appeal Court desire to go back on a
+former decision of law, this to be possible only at
+a meeting of the Court comprising at least twelve
+members of the Permanent Bench.</p>
+
+<p>VII. The proposal which I have just sketched,
+and which will need to be worked out in detail if
+it is to be realised, offers the following advantages:</p>
+
+<p>Every case would in the first instance be decided
+by a small Bench which would enjoy the confidence
+of both parties because they would have their own
+judge in the Court. This point is of particular importance
+with regard to the mode of taking evidence
+and making clear the facts; but is likewise of importance
+on account of the divergence of fundamental
+legal views and the like.</p>
+
+<p>Since the Court of Appeal would only decide points
+of law, the facts as elucidated by the Bench of First
+Instance would remain settled. But the existence of
+the Court of Appeal would enable the parties to re-argue
+questions of law with all details. The fact that
+six of the Bench which serves as a Court of Appeal
+are members of the Permanent Bench would guarantee
+a thorough reconsideration of the points of
+law concerned, and likewise the maintenance and
+sequence of tradition in International Administration
+of Justice.</p>
+
+<p>Again, the fact that the Court of Appeal is to
+comprise, besides six members of the Permanent
+Bench, those three judges who sat as the Bench
+of First Instance would guarantee that the judges
+appointed by the States in dispute could again bring
+into play any particular views of law they may hold.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[68]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>VIII. This is the outline of my scheme for the
+establishment and manning of the International
+Court of Justice. But before I leave the subject,
+I must say a few words concerning two important
+points which almost all other schemes for the establishment
+of an International Court overlook. Firstly,
+the necessity to make provision for what I should
+like to call complex cases of dispute; namely, cases
+which are justiciable but in which, besides the
+question of law, there is at the same time involved
+a vital political principle or claim. Take the case
+of a South American State entering into an agreement
+with a non-American State to lease to it a
+coaling station: this case is justiciable, but besides
+the question of law there is a political claim involved
+in it, namely, the Monroe doctrine of the United
+States. Unless provision be made for the settlement
+of such complex cases, the League of Nations
+will not be a success, for it might well happen that
+a case touches vital political interests in such a way
+as not to permit a State to have it settled by a mere
+juristic decision.</p>
+
+<p>Now my proposal to meet such complex cases is
+that when a party objects to a settlement of a case
+on mere juristic principles, although the other party
+maintains that it is a justiciable case, the Bench
+which is to serve as Bench of First Instance shall
+investigate the matter with regard to the question
+whether the case is more political than legal in
+nature. If the Court decides the question in the
+negative, then the same Court shall give judgment
+on the dispute; but, if the Court decides the question<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[69]</a></span>
+in the affirmative, then the case shall be referred by
+the Court to the International Council of Conciliation.
+Whatever the decision of the Bench of First
+Instance may be, each party shall have the right of
+appeal to the Permanent Bench which serves as the
+Court of Appeal.</p>
+
+<p>IX. The other point which I desire to mention
+before I leave the subject of International Administration
+of Justice concerns the notorious principle
+<i>conventio omnis intelligitur rebus sic stantibus</i>. You
+know that almost all publicists and also almost
+all Governments assert the existence of a customary
+rule according to which a vital change of circumstances
+after ratification of a treaty may be of such
+a kind as to justify a party in demanding to be
+released either from the whole treaty or from certain
+obligations stipulated in it. But the meaning of
+the term 'vital change of circumstances' is elastic,
+and there is therefore great danger that the principle
+<i>conventio omnis intelligitur rebus sic stantibus</i> will
+be abused for the purpose of hiding the violation
+of treaties behind the shield of law. This danger
+will remain so long as there is no International
+Court in existence which, on the motion of one of
+the contracting parties, could set aside the treaty
+obligation whose fulfilment has become so oppressive
+that in justice the obliged party might ask to be
+released. Now, as the League of Nations is to set
+up an International Court of Justice, my proposal
+is that the Court should be declared competent to
+give judgment on the claim of a party to a treaty
+to be released from its obligations on account of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[70]</a></span>
+vital change of circumstances. Of course the case
+would go before that Bench of the Court which is to
+serve as the Court of First Instance, and an appeal
+would lie to the Permanent Bench which serves
+as the Court of Appeal.</p>
+
+<p>X. Having given you the outlines of a scheme
+concerning International Administration of Justice,
+I now turn to International Mediation by International
+Councils of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>For a satisfactory proposal concerning International
+Councils of Conciliation two starting points
+offer themselves. One starting point is the special
+form of mediation recommended by Article 8 of
+the Hague Convention concerning the pacific settlement
+of international disputes. The following is
+the text of this Article 8:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>'The Signatory Powers are agreed in recommending the application,
+when circumstances allow, of special mediation in the following
+form:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>'In case of a serious difference endangering peace, the contending
+States choose respectively a Power, to which they intrust the mission
+of entering into direct communication with the Power chosen on
+the other side, with the object of preventing the rupture of pacific
+relations.</p>
+
+<p>'For the period of this mandate, the term of which, in default
+of agreement to the contrary, cannot exceed thirty days, the States
+at variance cease from all direct communication on the subject of
+the dispute, which is regarded as referred exclusively to the mediating
+Powers. These Powers shall use their best efforts to settle the
+dispute.</p>
+
+<p>'In case of a definite rupture of pacific relations, these Powers
+remain jointly charged with the task of taking advantage of any
+opportunity to restore peace.'</p></div>
+
+<p>The second starting point is supplied by the Permanent
+International Commissions of the so-called<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[71]</a></span>
+Bryan Peace Treaties concluded in 1913-14 by the
+United States of America with a number of other
+States. These peace treaties are not in every point
+identical, but of interest to us here are the clauses
+according to which Permanent International Commissions
+are set up to serve as Councils of Conciliation.
+The following is the text of the three articles
+concerned of the treaty between the United States
+and Great Britain of September 15, 1914:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>Art. I. 'The High Contracting Parties agree that all disputes
+between them, of every nature whatsoever, other than disputes the
+settlement of which is provided for and in fact achieved under
+existing agreements between the High Contracting Parties, shall,
+when diplomatic methods of adjustment have failed, be referred for
+investigation and report to a permanent International Commission,
+to be constituted in the manner prescribed in the next succeeding
+article; and they agree not to declare war or begin hostilities during
+such investigation and before the report is submitted.'</p>
+
+<p>Art. II. 'The International Commission shall be composed of
+five members, to be appointed as follows: One member shall be
+chosen from each country, by the Government thereof; one member
+shall be chosen by each Government from some third country; the
+fifth member shall be chosen by common agreement between the
+two Governments, it being understood that he shall not be a citizen
+of either country. The expenses of the Commission shall be paid
+by the two Governments in equal proportions.'</p>
+
+<p>'The International Commission shall be appointed within six
+months after the exchange of the ratifications of this treaty; and
+vacancies shall be filled according to the manner of the original
+appointment.'</p>
+
+<p>Art. III. 'In case the High Contracting Parties shall have failed
+to adjust a dispute by diplomatic methods, they shall at once refer
+it to the International Commission for investigation and report.
+The International Commission may, however, spontaneously by
+unanimous agreement offer its services to that effect, and in such
+case it shall notify both Governments and request their co-operation
+in the investigation.'</p></div><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[72]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Keeping in view the special form of mediation
+recommended by Article 8 of the Hague Convention
+concerning the Pacific Settlement of International
+Disputes and the stipulations of the Bryan Peace
+Treaties concerning Permanent International Commissions,
+we can reach a satisfactory solution of
+the problem of International Mediation if we take
+into consideration the two reasons why a League of
+Nations must stipulate the compulsion of its members
+to bring non-justiciable disputes before a Council
+of Conciliation previous to resorting to hostilities.
+These reasons are, firstly, that war in future shall
+not be declared without a previous attempt to have
+the dispute peaceably settled, and, secondly, that
+war in future shall not break out like a bolt from
+the blue.</p>
+
+<p>XI. My proposal concerning International Councils
+of Conciliation is the following:</p>
+
+<p>Every member of the League shall appoint for a
+term of years&mdash;say five or ten&mdash;two conciliators
+and two deputy conciliators from among their own
+subjects, and one conciliator and one deputy conciliator
+from among the subjects of some other
+State. Now when a non-justiciable dispute arises
+between two States which has not been settled by
+diplomatic means, the three conciliators of each
+party in dispute shall meet to investigate the matter,
+to report thereon, and to propose, if possible, a
+settlement.</p>
+
+<p>According to this proposal there would be in
+existence a number of Councils of Conciliation equal
+to half the number of the members of the League.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[73]</a></span>
+Whenever a dispute arises, the Permanent Council
+of Conciliation&mdash;with which I shall deal presently&mdash;shall
+appoint a Chairman from amongst its own
+members. The Council thus constituted shall investigate
+the case, report on it, send a copy to
+each party in dispute and to the Permanent Council
+of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>Permanent</i> Council of Conciliation should be
+a <i>small</i> Council to be established by each of the
+Great Powers appointing one conciliator and one
+deputy conciliator for a period of&mdash;say&mdash;five or ten
+years. The reason why only the Great Powers
+should be represented in the Permanent Council of
+Conciliation at the Hague is that naturally, in case
+coercion is to be resorted to against a State which
+begins war without having previously submitted the
+dispute to a Council of Conciliation, the Great Powers
+will be chiefly concerned. This Permanent Council
+of Conciliation would have to watch the political
+life of the members of the League and communicate
+with all the Governments of the members in case
+the peace of the world were endangered by the
+attitude of one of the members; for instance by one
+or more of the members arming excessively. The
+Council would likewise be competent to draw the
+attention of States involved in a dispute to the
+fact that they ought to bring it before either the
+International Court of Justice or their special Council
+of Conciliation.</p>
+
+<p>This proposal of mine concerning mediation within
+the League of Nations is, of course, sketchy and
+would need working out in detail if one were thinking<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[74]</a></span>
+of preparing a full plan for its realisation. However
+that may be, my proposal concerning a number
+of Councils of Conciliation has the advantage that
+non-justiciable disputes would in each case be
+investigated and reported on by conciliators who
+have once for all been appointed by the States in
+dispute and who therefore possess their confidence.
+On the other hand, the proposed Permanent Council
+of Conciliation would guarantee to the Great Powers
+that important influence which is due to them on
+account of the fact that they would be chiefly concerned
+in case economic, military, or naval measures
+had to be resorted to against a recalcitrant member
+of the League.</p>
+
+<p>XII. Having discussed International Mediation
+by International Councils of Conciliation, I must
+now turn to two questions which I have hitherto
+purposely omitted, although in the eyes of many
+people they stand in the forefront of interest,
+namely, firstly, <i>disarmament</i> as a consequence of
+the peaceable settlement of disputes by an International
+Court of Justice and International Councils
+of Conciliation, and, secondly, the question of the
+<i>surrender of sovereignty</i> which it is asserted is involved
+by the entrance of any State into the proposed
+League of Nations.</p>
+
+<p>Now as regards disarmament, I have deliberately
+abstained from mentioning it hitherto, although it
+is certainly a question of the greatest importance.
+The reason for my abstention is a very simple one.
+I have always maintained that disarmament can
+neither diminish the number of wars nor abolish<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[75]</a></span>
+war altogether, but that, if the number of wars
+diminishes or if war be abolished altogether, disarmament
+will follow. There is no doubt that when
+once the new League of Nations is in being, war will
+occur much more rarely than hitherto. For this
+reason disarmament will <i>ipso facto</i> follow the establishment
+of a League of Nations, and the details
+of such disarmament are matters which will soon
+be solved when once the new League has become
+a reality. Yet I must emphasise the fact that
+disarmament is not identical with the total abolition
+of armies and navies. The possibility must always
+be kept in view that one or more members of the
+League will be recalcitrant, and that then the other
+members must unite their forces against them.
+And there must likewise be kept in view the possibility
+of a war between two members of the League
+on account of a political dispute in which mediation
+by the International Councils of Conciliation was
+unsuccessful. Be that as it may, it is certain that
+in time disarmament can take place to a very great
+extent, and it is quite probable that large standing
+armies based on conscription might everywhere be
+abolished and be replaced by militia.</p>
+
+<p>XIII. Let me now turn to the question of
+sovereignty. Is the assertion really true that States
+renounce their sovereignty by entering into the
+League? The answer depends entirely upon the
+conception of sovereignty with which one starts.
+If sovereignty were absolutely unfettered liberty of
+action, a loss of sovereignty would certainly be
+involved by membership of the League, because<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[76]</a></span>
+every member submits to the obligation never to
+resort to arms on account of a judicial dispute, and
+in case of a political dispute to resort to arms only
+after having given an opportunity of mediation to
+an International Council of Conciliation. But in
+fact sovereignty does not mean absolutely boundless
+liberty of action; and moreover sovereignty
+has at no time been a conception upon the contents
+of which there has been general agreement.</p>
+
+<p>The term 'sovereignty' was introduced into political
+science by Bodin in his celebrated work 'De
+la R&eacute;publique,' which appeared in 1577. Before
+that time, the word <i>souverain</i> was used in France
+for any political or other authority which was not
+subordinate to any higher authority; for instance,
+the highest Courts were called <i>cours souveraines</i>.
+Now Bodin gave quite a new meaning to the old
+term. Being under the influence and in favour of
+the policy of centralisation initiated by Louis XI
+of France (1461-1483), the founder of French absolutism,
+Bodin defines sovereignty as the 'absolute
+and perpetual power within a State.' However,
+even Bodin was far from considering sovereignty to
+give absolutely unfettered freedom of action, for
+he conceded that sovereignty was restricted by the
+commandments of God and by the rules of the
+Law of Nature. Be that as it may, this conception
+of sovereignty once introduced was universally
+accepted; but at the same time the meaning of
+the term became immediately a bone of contention
+between the schools of publicists. And it is to be
+taken into consideration that the science of politics<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[77]</a></span>
+has learnt to distinguish between sovereignty of the
+State and sovereignty of the agents who exercise
+the sovereign powers of the State. According to
+the modern view sovereignty is a natural attribute
+of every independent State as a State; and
+neither the monarch, nor Parliament, nor the people
+can possess any sovereignty of their own. The
+sovereignty of a monarch, or of a Parliament, or of
+the whole people is not an original attribute of their
+own, but derives from the sovereignty of the State
+which is governed by them. It is outside the scope
+of this lecture to give you a history of the conception
+of sovereignty, it suffices to state the undeniable
+fact that from the time when the term was first
+introduced into political science until the present
+day there has never been unanimity with regard
+to its meaning, except that it is a synonym for
+independence of all earthly authority.</p>
+
+<p>Now, do you believe that the independence of a
+State is really infringed because it agrees never to
+make war on account of a judicial dispute, and in
+case of a political dispute not to resort to arms before
+having given opportunity of mediation to International
+Councils of Conciliation? Independence
+is not boundless liberty of a State to do what it
+likes, without any restriction whatever. The mere
+fact that there is an International Law in existence
+restricts the unbounded liberty of action of every
+civilised State, because every State is prohibited
+from interfering with the affairs of every other State.
+The fact is that the independence of every State
+finds its limitation in the independence of every<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[78]</a></span>
+other State. And it is generally admitted that a
+State can through conventions&mdash;such as a treaty
+of alliance or of neutrality or others&mdash;enter into
+many obligations which more or less restrict its
+liberty of action. Independence is a question of
+degree, and, therefore, it is also a question of degree
+whether or no the independence of a State is vitally
+encroached upon by a certain restriction. In my
+opinion the independence of a State is as little
+infringed by an agreement to submit all its judicial
+disputes to the judgment of a Court and not to
+resort to arms for a settlement, as the liberty of a
+citizen is infringed because in a modern State he
+can no longer resort to arms on account of a dispute
+with a fellow citizen but must submit it to the
+judgment of the Court.</p>
+
+<p>And even if it were otherwise, if the entrance of
+a State into the new League of Nations did involve
+an infringement of its sovereignty and independence,
+humanity need not grieve over it. The Prussian
+conception of the State as an end in itself and of
+the authority of the State as something above
+everything else and divine&mdash;a conception which
+found support in the philosophy of Hegel and his
+followers&mdash;is adverse to the ideal of democracy
+and constitutional government. Just as Henri IV
+of France said 'La France vaut bien une messe,'
+we may well say 'La paix du monde vaut bien la
+perte de l'ind&eacute;pendance de l'&eacute;tat.'</p>
+
+<p>XIV. I have come to the end of this course of
+lectures, but before we part I should like, in conclusion,
+to touch upon a question which has<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[79]</a></span>
+frequently been put with regard to the proposal of
+a new League of Nations:&mdash;Can it really be expected
+that, in case of a great conflict of interests, all the
+members of the League will faithfully carry out
+their engagements? Will the new League stand the
+strain of such conflicts as shake the very existence
+of States and Nations? Will the League really
+stand the test of History?</p>
+
+<p>History teaches that many a State has entered
+into engagements with the intention of faithfully
+carrying them out, but, when a grave conflict arose,
+matters assumed a different aspect, with the consequence
+that the engagements remained unfulfilled.
+Will it be different in the future? Can the Powers
+which enter into the League of Nations trust to the
+security which it promises? Can they be prepared
+to disarm, although there is no guarantee that,
+when grave conflicts of vital interests arise, all
+the members of the League will faithfully stand by
+their engagements?</p>
+
+<p>These are questions which it is difficult to
+answer because no one can look into the future.
+We can only say that, if really constitutional and
+democratic government all the world over makes
+international politics honest and reliable and excludes
+secret treaties, all the chances are that the members
+of the League will see that their true interests and
+their lasting welfare are intimately connected with
+the necessity of fulfilling the obligations to which
+they have submitted by their entrance into the
+League. The upheaval created by the present World
+War, the many millions of lives sacrificed, and the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[80]</a></span>
+enormous economic losses suffered during these years
+of war, not only by the belligerents but also by all
+neutrals, will be remembered for many generations
+to come. It would therefore seem to be certain
+that, while the memory of these losses in lives and
+wealth lasts, all the members of the League will
+faithfully carry out the obligations connected with
+the membership of the League into which they enter
+for the purpose of avoiding such a disaster as, like
+a bolt from the blue, fell upon mankind by the
+outbreak of the present war. On the other hand, I
+will not deny that no one can guarantee the future;
+that conflicts may arise which will shake the foundations
+of the League of Nations; that the League may
+fall to pieces; and that a disaster like the present
+may again visit mankind. Our generation can only
+do its best for the future, and it must be left to
+succeeding generations to perpetuate the work
+initiated by us.</p>
+
+<hr /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[81]</a></span></p>
+<h2>INDEX</h2>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Administration</span> of Justice by International Courts, difficulties of, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>;<ul>
+<li>maintenance of tradition of, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</li>
+<li>permanent institution for the, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Aims of the League of Nations defined, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35-36</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_45">45-55</a>;<ul>
+<li>controversy respecting interpretation of, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</li>
+<li>correspondence respecting, with Foreign Office, <a href="#Page_48">48-55</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Autocratic Government, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Belgium</span>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Bodin, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Bonfils on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Bordwell on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</li>
+
+<li>British Empire, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Bryan Peace Treaties, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Bryce, Lord, scheme of, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Central Powers</span>, the, are they to become members of the League of Nations? <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>;<ul>
+<li>necessity for utter defeat of, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Colonies, wars for the acquisition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Complex cases of dispute, how to settle, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Congress of Vienna, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Constitutional Government, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>;<ul>
+<li>necessity for, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Court of Appeal, International, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>;<ul>
+<li>manning of, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Court of Arbitration, establishment of International, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Court of First Instance, International, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>;<ul>
+<li>manning of, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Cruc&eacute;e, Emeric, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Davis</span>, General, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Democracy, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Dickinson, scheme of Sir Willoughby, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Disarmament, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Dubois, Pierre, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Dynastic wars, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Engagements</span> of the members of the League of Nations, security for fulfilment of, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Equality, of States, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;<ul>
+<li>of the votes at Hague Peace Conferences, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>.</li></ul></li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Family</span>, the, a product of natural development, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Family of Nations, political hegemony of the Great Powers within the, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Federal World State, A, <a href="#Page_18">18-20</a>;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[82]</a></span><ul>
+<li>demanded by Pacifists, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</li>
+<li>why not possible, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Foreign Office, letter of, to Professor Oppenheim concerning Article 23(h), <a href="#Page_52">52-55</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">German</span> Confederation, civil war within the, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>.</li>
+
+<li>German Weissbuch on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Germany, is she to become a member of the League of Nations? <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>;<ul>
+<li>necessity for the utter defeat of, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Great Powers, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>;<ul>
+<li>power and influence of the, <a href="#Page_29">29-31</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Greece, city States of ancient, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Gregory on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Grey, Earl, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Grotians, the School of, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Grotius, Hugo, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Hague</span> Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, Article 8 of, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Hague Peace Conferences, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;<ul>
+<li>method of legislating by, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</li>
+<li>the work of, obstructed by some States, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>;</li>
+<li>standing council of, proposed, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</li>
+<li>starting point of organisation of League of Nations by, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</li>
+<li>votes of States of equal value at, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, controversy respecting interpretation of Article 23(h) of, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Henry IV of France, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Holland, Professor, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Independence</span> of States, what it is, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>.</li>
+
+<li>International Army and Navy, why impossible, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20-22</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>.</li>
+
+<li>International Case Law, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>.</li>
+
+<li><a name="International_Council_of_Conciliation" id="International_Council_of_Conciliation"></a>International Council of Conciliation, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>;<ul>
+<li>scheme for the establishment of, <a href="#Page_72">72-74</a>;</li>
+<li>starting points for, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>International Court of Appeal, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;<ul>
+<li>a necessity, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>;</li>
+<li>manning of, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>International Court of First Instance, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>;<ul>
+<li>manning of proposed bench to serve as, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>International Court of Justice, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65-68</a>;<ul>
+<li>manning of, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>;</li>
+<li>proposed permanent bench of, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>;</li>
+<li>proposed special benches of, for different cases, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>International Courts, claims of all States in manning of, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>;<ul>
+<li>difficulties of manning of, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>;</li>
+<li>precedents of, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>International Executive, why impossible, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>.</li>
+
+<li>International Government, why impossible, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.</li>
+
+<li>International Law, a book law at present, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>;<ul>
+<li>and League of Nations interdependent, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>;</li>
+<li>complied with often without Courts, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>;</li>
+<li>grew by custom during Middle Ages, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>;</li>
+<li>not in being in antiquity, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>;</li>
+<li>progress of, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>;</li>
+<li>universal and general, difference between, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>International Legislation, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41-48</a>;<ul>
+<li>a by-product only in the past, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
+<li>difficulties of, created by conflicting interests of States, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;</li>
+<li>difficulties of, created by different methods of interpretation and construction, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</li>
+<li>difficulties of, created by the fact that a majority vote cannot create a statute, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;</li>
+<li>difficulties of, created by the language question, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>;</li>
+<li>meaning of the term, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[83]</a></span></li>
+<li>possible even without International Courts, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>;</li>
+<li>possible only by agreement of all the States, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
+<li>wide field open for, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>International Statutes, cannot be created by majority vote, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;<ul>
+<li>interpretation and construction of, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</li>
+<li>what are? <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Internationalism, growth of, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Law-making</span> treaties, what are? <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</li>
+
+<li>'La France vaut bien une messe,' <a href="#Page_78">78</a>.</li>
+
+<li>League of Nations, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>;<ul>
+<li>aims defined, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35-36</a>;</li>
+<li>and International Law interdependent, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>;</li>
+<li>career in a sense started already, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>;</li>
+<li>conception of, very old, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>;</li>
+<li>demand for, universal, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>;</li>
+<li>impossibility of state-like organisation of, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>;</li>
+<li>no unanimity concerning its aims or organisation, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>;</li>
+<li>organisation of, demanded, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</li>
+<li>problems connected with, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>;</li>
+<li>seven principles of, which ought to be adopted, <a href="#Page_39">39-41</a>;</li>
+<li>so-called, but League of States is meant, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>;</li>
+<li>starting point of organisation of, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</li>
+<li>constitution <i>sui generis</i> of, a necessity, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>;</li>
+<li>what is new in the now desired, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>;</li>
+<li>when it would be an organised community, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>.</li></ul></li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Marini</span>, Antoine, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Mediation, International. <i>See</i> <a href="#International_Council_of_Conciliation">International Council of Conciliation</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Militarism, conception of, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>;<ul>
+<li>Prussian, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>.</li></ul></li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Nation</span>, the, a product of historical development, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>;<ul>
+<li>conception of, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>;</li>
+<li>not to be confounded with race, <a href="#Page_13">13-14</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Nations, not to be confounded with States, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Nationality, principle of, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>.</li>
+
+<li>'Natura non facit saltus,' <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Naturalists, the School of, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Oppenheim</span>, letter of Foreign Office concerning Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations to Professor, <a href="#Page_52">52-55</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Pacifists</span>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Parliament, International, why impossible, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Permanent Court of Arbitration, International, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;<ul>
+<li>establishment of, by the First Peace Conference, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Permanent International Commissions of the Bryan Peace Treaties, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Podiebrad, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Police, International, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Politis on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Porter <i>v.</i> Freundenberg, case of, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Positivists, the School of, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Precedents of International Courts, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Principle of Nationality, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Prize Court, International, proposed by Second Peace Conference, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Quis</span> custodiet ipsos custodes? <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Race</span>, a product of natural development, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>;<ul>
+<li>not to be confounded with Nation, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>Rebus sic stantibus, proposal for dealing with the clause, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Religion, wars of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Sovereignty</span>, conception of, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[84]</a></span><ul>
+<li>not surrendered by entrance into the League of Nations, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>.</li></ul></li>
+
+<li>State, ideal of the national, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>.</li>
+
+<li>States of the World, the 25 Allied belligerent and the 17 neutral, <a href="#Page_16">16-17</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Statutes, difference between International and Municipal, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Sully, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Swiss Confederation, civil war within the, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Switzerland, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Taft</span>, Ex-President, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Transoceanic States, entrance into League of Nations of, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Tribe, the, a product of natural development, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Ubi</span> societas ibi jus, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Ullmann, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</li>
+
+<li>United States, civil war in the, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Vienna</span> Congress, the, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Votes, equality of, at Hague Peace Conferences, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<ul><li><span class="smcap">Wars</span> for national unity, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Wehberg on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Whewell, Dr., <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Whittuck on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</li>
+
+<li>Wilson, President, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.</li>
+
+<li>World Federation, a demand of Pacifists, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p class="p4"><b><span class="fsxs">AT THE BALLANTYNE PRESS<br />
+PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE, BALLANTYNE AND CO. LTD.<br />
+COLCHESTER, LONDON AND ETON, ENGLAND</span></b></p>
+
+<div class="trn"><b>Transcriber's Note:</b>
+Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.
+Variant spellings have been retained. Hyphenation has been standardised.</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The League of Nations and its Problems, by 
+Lassa Oppenheim
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LEAGUE OF NATIONS, ITS PROBLEMS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 26023-h.htm or 26023-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+        https://www.gutenberg.org/2/6/0/2/26023/
+
+Produced by Stephen Blundell and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
+paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.  See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
+     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
+     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+     License.  You must require such a user to return or
+     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+     Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+     of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+     Chief Executive and Director
+     gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations.  To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+     https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0001.png b/26023-page-images/f0001.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..479ec44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0001.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0002.png b/26023-page-images/f0002.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f3267c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0002.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0003.png b/26023-page-images/f0003.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cb5ef3e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0003.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0004.png b/26023-page-images/f0004.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..619cf10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0004.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0005.png b/26023-page-images/f0005.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b75014
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0005.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0006.png b/26023-page-images/f0006.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d42b567
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0006.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0007.png b/26023-page-images/f0007.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fe2c146
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0007.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0008.png b/26023-page-images/f0008.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1aa44fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0008.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0009.png b/26023-page-images/f0009.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a5c316f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0009.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0010.png b/26023-page-images/f0010.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..43be46c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0010.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/f0011.png b/26023-page-images/f0011.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..de41a7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/f0011.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0001.png b/26023-page-images/p0001.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..54f88bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0001.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0002-blank.png b/26023-page-images/p0002-blank.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1475956
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0002-blank.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0003.png b/26023-page-images/p0003.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd53155
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0003.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0004.png b/26023-page-images/p0004.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca856b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0004.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0005.png b/26023-page-images/p0005.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0f6ebdf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0005.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0006.png b/26023-page-images/p0006.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9ee0e6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0006.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0007.png b/26023-page-images/p0007.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ebb5457
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0007.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0008.png b/26023-page-images/p0008.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1abf5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0008.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0009.png b/26023-page-images/p0009.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c830b8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0009.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0010.png b/26023-page-images/p0010.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2e2fce3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0010.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0011.png b/26023-page-images/p0011.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..33247f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0011.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0012.png b/26023-page-images/p0012.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..72e2fc9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0012.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0013.png b/26023-page-images/p0013.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..748c18c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0013.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0014.png b/26023-page-images/p0014.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..752cb1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0014.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0015.png b/26023-page-images/p0015.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f067354
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0015.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0016.png b/26023-page-images/p0016.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..030e0cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0016.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0017.png b/26023-page-images/p0017.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4ef2d8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0017.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0018.png b/26023-page-images/p0018.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c78435b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0018.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0019.png b/26023-page-images/p0019.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..53c56e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0019.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0020.png b/26023-page-images/p0020.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3d7c26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0020.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0021.png b/26023-page-images/p0021.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0157ff8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0021.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0022.png b/26023-page-images/p0022.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..90bc615
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0022.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0023.png b/26023-page-images/p0023.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9f87795
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0023.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0024.png b/26023-page-images/p0024.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a83a0aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0024.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0025.png b/26023-page-images/p0025.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4e34cf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0025.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0026-blank.png b/26023-page-images/p0026-blank.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3fee07d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0026-blank.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0027.png b/26023-page-images/p0027.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4d0703f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0027.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0028.png b/26023-page-images/p0028.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f57b49b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0028.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0029.png b/26023-page-images/p0029.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0974514
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0029.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0030.png b/26023-page-images/p0030.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3546e0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0030.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0031.png b/26023-page-images/p0031.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd0d2e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0031.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0032.png b/26023-page-images/p0032.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6916b95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0032.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0033.png b/26023-page-images/p0033.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d60269
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0033.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0034.png b/26023-page-images/p0034.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2447850
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0034.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0035.png b/26023-page-images/p0035.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..96abf75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0035.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0036.png b/26023-page-images/p0036.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e37f52e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0036.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0037.png b/26023-page-images/p0037.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..749278c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0037.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0038.png b/26023-page-images/p0038.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..180fdad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0038.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0039.png b/26023-page-images/p0039.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0160047
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0039.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0040.png b/26023-page-images/p0040.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2cb2c1e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0040.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0041.png b/26023-page-images/p0041.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3ba015d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0041.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0042.png b/26023-page-images/p0042.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..05f35f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0042.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0043.png b/26023-page-images/p0043.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c2c429f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0043.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0044.png b/26023-page-images/p0044.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2c8d736
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0044.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0045.png b/26023-page-images/p0045.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..12aaf8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0045.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0046.png b/26023-page-images/p0046.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..94269b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0046.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0047.png b/26023-page-images/p0047.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..55a7d78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0047.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0048.png b/26023-page-images/p0048.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..de0e663
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0048.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0049.png b/26023-page-images/p0049.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e629adb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0049.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0050.png b/26023-page-images/p0050.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..80c8b8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0050.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0051.png b/26023-page-images/p0051.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c350b9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0051.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0052.png b/26023-page-images/p0052.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2a42d89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0052.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0053.png b/26023-page-images/p0053.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7353cce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0053.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0054.png b/26023-page-images/p0054.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c4beb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0054.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0055.png b/26023-page-images/p0055.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8db74a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0055.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0056-blank.png b/26023-page-images/p0056-blank.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ee7ea7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0056-blank.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0057.png b/26023-page-images/p0057.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..62c89c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0057.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0058-blank.png b/26023-page-images/p0058-blank.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..099acd8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0058-blank.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0059.png b/26023-page-images/p0059.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d3e497e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0059.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0060.png b/26023-page-images/p0060.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e889d90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0060.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0061.png b/26023-page-images/p0061.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c83c7b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0061.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0062.png b/26023-page-images/p0062.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0ee541
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0062.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0063.png b/26023-page-images/p0063.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..70ca860
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0063.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0064.png b/26023-page-images/p0064.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8592a38
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0064.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0065.png b/26023-page-images/p0065.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5783485
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0065.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0066.png b/26023-page-images/p0066.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd34474
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0066.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0067.png b/26023-page-images/p0067.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ea9e488
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0067.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0068.png b/26023-page-images/p0068.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..24f4d0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0068.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0069.png b/26023-page-images/p0069.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1f05ab9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0069.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0070.png b/26023-page-images/p0070.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..79581e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0070.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0071.png b/26023-page-images/p0071.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ac8e12a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0071.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0072.png b/26023-page-images/p0072.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fb7d549
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0072.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0073.png b/26023-page-images/p0073.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4741001
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0073.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0074.png b/26023-page-images/p0074.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fc8984e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0074.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0075.png b/26023-page-images/p0075.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..83ec9ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0075.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0076.png b/26023-page-images/p0076.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..319cdec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0076.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0077.png b/26023-page-images/p0077.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f6b8ea5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0077.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0078.png b/26023-page-images/p0078.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6cca28d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0078.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0079.png b/26023-page-images/p0079.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c9a8aad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0079.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0080.png b/26023-page-images/p0080.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1751173
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0080.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0081.png b/26023-page-images/p0081.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9eeefd1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0081.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0082.png b/26023-page-images/p0082.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..edb294b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0082.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0083.png b/26023-page-images/p0083.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8b04f98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0083.png
diff --git a/26023-page-images/p0084.png b/26023-page-images/p0084.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..345be66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023-page-images/p0084.png
diff --git a/26023.txt b/26023.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b77c358
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3241 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The League of Nations and its Problems, by
+Lassa Oppenheim
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The League of Nations and its Problems
+       Three Lectures
+
+Author: Lassa Oppenheim
+
+Release Date: July 10, 2008 [EBook #26023]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LEAGUE OF NATIONS, ITS PROBLEMS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Stephen Blundell and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+                   CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL LAW
+                             AND DIPLOMACY
+
+                  Edited by L. OPPENHEIM, M.A., LL.D.
+
+              Membre de l'Institut de Droit International,
+ Whewell Professor of International Law in the University of Cambridge,
+    Honorary Member of the Royal Academy of Jurisprudence at Madrid,
+  Corresponding Member of the American Institute of International Law.
+
+
+                         THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+                            AND ITS PROBLEMS
+
+
+
+
+                    CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL
+                          LAW AND DIPLOMACY.
+
+Edited by L. OPPENHEIM, M.A., LL.D., Whewell Professor of International
+Law in the University of Cambridge.
+
+A GUIDE TO DIPLOMATIC PRACTICE. By the Right Hon. Sir ERNEST SATOW,
+G.C.M.G., LL.D., D.C.L., formerly Envoy Extraordinary and Minister
+Plenipotentiary. 2 Volumes. 8vo. 30_s._ net.
+
+INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND THIRD STATES. A Monograph. By RONALD F.
+ROXBURGH, of the Middle Temple, Barrister-at-Law; formerly Whewell
+International Law Scholar in the University of Cambridge; formerly
+Scholar of Trinity College, Cambridge. 8vo. 7_s._ 6_d._ net.
+
+                       LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.,
+           London, New York, Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras.
+
+
+
+
+                                  THE
+                           LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+                           AND ITS PROBLEMS
+
+
+                            THREE LECTURES
+
+
+                                  BY
+
+                       L. OPPENHEIM, M.A., LL.D.
+
+ WHEWELL PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
+    MEMBRE DE L'INSTITUT DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL. HONORARY MEMBER OF
+      THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF JURISPRUDENCE AT MADRID, CORRESPONDING
+                  MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF
+                           INTERNATIONAL LAW
+
+
+                                                       _Festina lente_
+
+
+                        LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.
+                      39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON
+                FOURTH AVENUE & 30TH STREET, NEW YORK,
+                     BOMBAY, CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS.
+                                 1919
+
+
+
+
+PREFACE
+
+
+The three lectures collected in this volume were prepared without any
+intention of publication. They were delivered for the purpose of drawing
+attention to the links which connect the proposal for a League of
+Nations with the past, to the difficulties which stand in the way of the
+realisation of the proposal, and to some schemes by which these
+difficulties might be overcome. When it was suggested that the lectures
+should be brought before the public at large by being issued in book
+form I hesitated, because I was doubtful whether the academic method
+natural to a University lecture would be suitable to a wider public.
+After consideration, however, I came to the conclusion that their
+publication might be useful, because the lectures attempt to show how
+the development initiated by the two Hague Peace Conferences could be
+continued by turning the movement for a League of Nations into the road
+of progress that these Conferences opened.
+
+Professional International lawyers do not share the belief that the
+outbreak of the World War and its, in many ways, lawless and atrocious
+conduct have proved the futility of the work of the Hague Conferences.
+Throughout these anxious years we have upheld the opinion that the
+progress initiated at the Hague has by no means been swept away by the
+attitude of lawlessness deliberately--'because necessity knows no
+law'--taken up by Germany, provided only that she should be utterly
+defeated, and should be compelled to atone and make ample reparation for
+the many cruel wrongs which cry to Heaven. While I am writing these
+lines, there is happily no longer any doubt that this condition will be
+fulfilled. We therefore believe that, after the map of Europe has been
+redrawn by the coming Peace Congress, the third Conference ought to
+assemble at the Hague for the purpose of establishing the demanded
+League of Nations and supplying it with the rudiments of an
+organisation.
+
+How this could be accomplished in a very simple way the following three
+lectures attempt to show. They likewise offer some very slight outlines
+of a scheme for setting up International Councils of Conciliation as
+well as an International Court of Justice comprising a number of
+Benches. I would ask the reader kindly to take these very lightly
+outlined schemes for what they are worth. Whatever may be their defects
+they indicate a way out of some of the great difficulties which beset
+the realisation of the universal demand for International Councils of
+Conciliation and an International Court of Justice.
+
+It is well known that several of the allied Governments have appointed
+Committees to study the problem of a League of Nations and to prepare a
+scheme which could be put before the coming Peace Congress. But unless
+all, or at any rate all the more important, neutral States are
+represented, it will be impossible for an all-embracing League of
+Nations to be created by that Congress; although a scheme could well be
+adopted which would keep the door open for all civilised States.
+However, until all these States have actually been received within the
+charmed circle, the League will not be complete nor its aims fully
+realised. Whatever the coming Peace Congress may be able to achieve with
+regard to a scheme for the establishment of the League of Nations,
+another--the third--Hague Peace Conference will be needed to set it
+going.
+
+                                                    L. OPPENHEIM.
+
+    P.S.--While this Preface and volume were going through the Press,
+    Austria-Hungary and Germany surrendered, and unprecedented
+    revolutions broke out which swept the Hapsburg, the Hohenzollern,
+    and all the other German dynasties away. No one can foresee what
+    will be the ultimate fate and condition of those two once mighty
+    empires. It is obvious that, had the first and second lectures been
+    delivered after these stirring events took place, some of the views
+    to be found therein expressed would have been modified or
+    differently expressed. I may ask the reader kindly to keep this in
+    mind while reading the following pages. However, the general bearing
+    of the arguments, and the proposals for the organisation of the
+    League of Nations and the establishment of an International Court of
+    Justice and International Councils of Conciliation, are in no way
+    influenced by these later events.
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+                                                                    PAGE
+
+ FIRST LECTURE: THE AIMS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS                      1
+
+   I. The purpose of the three Lectures is to draw attention to
+ the links which connect the proposed League of Nations with
+ the past, to the difficulties involved in the proposal, and to
+ the way in which they can be overcome                                 4
+
+   II. The conception of a League of Nations is not new, but is
+ as old as International Law, because any kind of International
+ Law and some kind of a League of Nations are interdependent and
+ correlative                                                           6
+
+   III. During antiquity no International Law in the modern
+ sense of the term was possible, because the common interests
+ which could force a number of independent States into a
+ Community of States were lacking                                      6
+
+   IV. But during the second part of the Middle Ages matters
+ began to change. During the fifteenth, sixteenth and
+ seventeenth centuries an International Law, and with it a kind
+ of League of Nations, became a necessity and therefore grew by
+ custom. At the same time arose the first schemes for a League
+ of Nations guaranteeing permanent peace, namely those of Pierre
+ Dubois (1305), Antoine Marini (1461), Sully (1603), and Emeric
+ Crucee (1623). Hugo Grotius' immortal work on 'The Law of War
+ and Peace' (1625)                                                     7
+
+   V. The League of Nations thus evolved by custom could not
+ undertake to prevent war; the conditions prevailing up to the
+ outbreak of the French Revolution made it impossible; it was
+ only during the nineteenth century that the principle of
+ nationality made growth                                               9
+
+   VI. The outbreak of the present World War is epoch-making
+ because it is at bottom a fight between the principle of
+ democratic and constitutional government and the principle of
+ militarism and autocratic government. The three new points in
+ the present demand for a League of Nations                           11
+
+   VII. How and why the peremptory demand for a new League of
+ Nations arose, and its connection with so-called
+ Internationalism                                                     11
+
+   VIII. The League of Nations now aimed at is not really a
+ League of Nations but of States. The ideal of the national
+ State                                                                13
+
+   IX. The two reasons why the establishment of a new League of
+ Nations is conditioned by the utter defeat of the Central
+ Powers                                                               15
+
+   X. Why--in a sense--the new League of Nations may be said to
+ have already started its career                                      16
+
+   XI. The impossibility of the demand that the new League of
+ Nations should create a Federal World State                          18
+
+   XII. The demand for an International Army and Navy                 20
+
+   XIII. The new League of Nations cannot give itself a
+ constitution of a state-like character, but only one _sui
+ generis_ on very simple lines                                        22
+
+   XIV. The three aims of the new League of Nations, and the
+ four problems to be faced and solved in order to make possible
+ the realisation of these aims                                        23
+
+
+ SECOND LECTURE: ORGANISATION AND LEGISLATION
+ OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS                                             25
+
+   I. The Community of civilised States, the at present
+ existing League of Nations, is a community without any
+ organisation, although there are plenty of legal rules for the
+ intercourse of the several States one with another                   28
+
+   II. The position of the Great Powers within the Community of
+ States is a mere political fact not based on Law                     29
+
+   III. The pacifistic demand or a Federal World State in order
+ to make the abolition of war a possibility                           31
+
+   IV. Every attempt at organising the desired new League of
+ Nations must start from, and keep intact, the independence and
+ equality of the several States, with the consequence that the
+ establishment of a central political authority above the
+ sovereign States is an impossibility                                 32
+
+   V. The development of an organisation of the Community of
+ States began before the outbreak of the World War and is to be
+ found in the establishment of the Permanent Court of
+ Arbitration at the Hague by the First Hague Peace Conference of
+ 1899. But more steps will be necessary to turn the hitherto
+ unorganised Community of States into an organised League of
+ Nations                                                              34
+
+   VI. The organisation of the desired new League of Nations
+ should start from the beginning made by the Hague Peace
+ Conferences, and the League should therefore include all the
+ independent civilised States                                         35
+
+   VII. The objection to the reception of the Central Powers,
+ and of Germany especially, into the League                           36
+
+   VIII. The objection to the reception of the minor
+ transoceanic States into the League                                  38
+
+   IX. The seven principles which ought to be accepted with
+ regard to the organisation of the new League of Nations              39
+
+   X. The organisation of the League of Nations is not an end in
+ itself but only a means of attaining three objects, the first
+ of which is International Legislation. The meaning of the term
+ 'International Legislation' in contradistinction to Municipal
+ Legislation. International Legislation in the past and in the
+ future                                                               41
+
+   XI. The difficulty in the way of International Legislation on
+ account of the language question                                     43
+
+   XII. The difficulty created by the conflicting national
+ interests of the several States                                      44
+
+   XIII. The difficulty caused by the fact that International
+ Statutes cannot be created by a majority vote of the States.
+ The difference between universal and general International Law
+ offers a way out                                                     44
+
+   XIV. The difficulty created by the fact that there are as yet
+ no universally recognised rules concerning interpretation and
+ construction of International Statutes and ordinary
+ Conventions. The notorious Article 23(h) of the Hague
+ Regulations concerning Land Warfare                                  45
+
+   _Appendix_: Correspondence with the Foreign Office respecting
+ the Interpretation of Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations
+ concerning Land Warfare                                              48
+
+
+ THIRD LECTURE: ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND
+ MEDIATION WITHIN THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS                               57
+
+   I. Administration of Justice within the League is a question
+ of International Courts, but it is incorrect to assert that
+ International Legislation necessitates the existence of
+ International Courts                                                 60
+
+   II. The Permanent Court of Arbitration created by the First
+ Hague Peace Conference                                               61
+
+   III. The difficulties connected with International
+ Administration of Justice by International Courts                    62
+
+   IV. The necessity for a Court of Appeal above the
+ International Court of First Instance                                63
+
+   V. The difficulties connected with the setting up and manning
+ of International Courts of Justice                                   64
+
+   VI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself because it
+ distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several
+ Benches which would be called upon to decide the cases               65
+
+   VII. The advantages of the recommended scheme                      67
+
+   VIII. A necessary provision for so-called complex cases of
+ dispute                                                              68
+
+   IX. A necessary provision with regard to the notorious clause
+ _rebus sic stantibus_                                                69
+
+   X. The two starting points for a satisfactory proposal
+ concerning International Mediation by International Councils of
+ Conciliation. Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning
+ Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. The Permanent
+ International Commissions of the Bryan Peace Treaties                70
+
+   XI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself for the
+ establishment of International Councils of Conciliation              72
+
+   XII. The question of disarmament                                   74
+
+   XIII. The assertion that States renounce their sovereignty by
+ entering into the League                                             75
+
+   XIV. Conclusion: Can it be expected that, in case of a great
+ conflict of interests, all the members of the League will
+ faithfully carry out their engagements?                              78
+
+
+ ALPHABETICAL INDEX                                                   81
+
+
+
+
+FIRST LECTURE
+
+THE AIMS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+
+    I. The purpose of the three Lectures is to draw attention to the
+    links which connect the proposed League of Nations with the past, to
+    the difficulties involved in the proposal, and to the way in which
+    they can be overcome.
+
+    II. The conception of a League of Nations is not new, but is as old
+    as International Law, because any kind of International Law and some
+    kind of a League of Nations are interdependent and correlative.
+
+    III. During antiquity no International Law in the modern sense of
+    the term was possible, because the common interests which could
+    force a number of independent States into a community of States were
+    lacking.
+
+    IV. But during the second part of the Middle Ages matters began to
+    change. During the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries
+    an International Law, and with it a kind of League of Nations,
+    became a necessity and therefore grew by custom. At the same time
+    arose the first schemes for a League of Nations guaranteeing
+    permanent peace, namely those of Pierre Dubois (1305), Antoine
+    Marini (1461), Sully (1603), and Emeric Crucee (1623). Hugo Grotius'
+    immortal work on 'The Law of War and Peace' (1625).
+
+    V. The League of Nations thus evolved by custom could not undertake
+    to prevent wars; the conditions prevailing up to the outbreak of the
+    French Revolution made it impossible; it was only during the
+    nineteenth century that the principle of nationality made growth.
+
+    VI. The outbreak of the present World War is epoch-making because it
+    is at bottom a fight between the principle of democratic and
+    constitutional government and the principle of militarism and
+    autocratic government. The three new points in the present demand
+    for a League of Nations.
+
+    VII. How and why the peremptory demand for a new League of Nations
+    arose, and its connection with so-called Internationalism.
+
+    VIII. The League of Nations now aimed at is not really a League of
+    Nations but of States. The ideal of the National State.
+
+    IX. The two reasons why the establishment of a new League of Nations
+    is conditioned by the utter defeat of the Central Powers.
+
+    X. Why--in a sense--the new League of Nations may be said to have
+    already started its career.
+
+    XI. The impossibility of the demand that the new League of Nations
+    should create a Federal World State.
+
+    XII. The demand for an International Army and Navy.
+
+    XIII. The new League of Nations cannot give itself a constitution of
+    a state-like character, but only one _sui generis_ on very simple
+    lines.
+
+    XIV. The three aims of the new League of Nations, and the four
+    problems to be faced and solved in order to make possible the
+    realisation of these aims.
+
+
+THE LECTURE
+
+I. Dr. Whewell, the founder of the Chair of International Law which I
+have the honour to occupy in this University, laid the injunction upon
+every holder of the Chair that he should 'make it his aim,' in all parts
+of his treatment of the subject, 'to lay down such rules and suggest
+such measures as may tend to diminish the evils of war and finally to
+extinguish war between nations.' It is to comply with the spirit, if not
+with the letter, of this injunction that I have announced the series of
+three lectures on a League of Nations. The present is the first, and in
+it I propose to treat of the Aims of the League. But, before I enter
+into a discussion of these aims, I should like to point out that I have
+no intention of dealing with the question whether or no a League of
+Nations should be founded at all. To my mind, and probably to the minds
+of most of you here, this question has been satisfactorily answered by
+the leading politicians of all parties and all countries since
+ex-President Taft put it soon after the outbreak of the World War; it
+suffices to mention Earl Grey in Great Britain and President Wilson in
+America. In giving these lectures I propose to draw your attention, on
+the one hand, to the links which connect the proposal for a League of
+Nations with the past, and, on the other hand, to the difficulties with
+which the realisation of the proposal must necessarily be attended; and
+also to the ways in which, in my opinion, these difficulties can be
+overcome.
+
+There is an old adage which says _Natura non facit saltus_, Nature takes
+no leaps. Everything in Nature develops gradually, step by step, and
+organically. It is, at any rate as a rule, the same with History.
+History in most cases takes no leaps, but if exceptionally History does
+take a leap, there is great danger of a bad slip backwards following. We
+must be on our guard lest the proposed League of Nations should take a
+leap in the dark, and the realisation of proposals be attempted which
+are so daring and so entirely out of keeping with the historical
+development of International Law and the growth of the Society of
+Nations, that there would be great danger of the whole scheme collapsing
+and the whole movement coming to naught.
+
+The movement for a League of Nations is sound, for its purpose is to
+secure a more lasting peace amongst the nations of the world than has
+hitherto prevailed. But a number of schemes to realise this purpose
+have been published which in my opinion go much too far because they
+comprise proposals which are not realisable in our days. You know that
+not only an International Court of Justice and an International Council
+of Conciliation have been proposed, but also some kind of International
+Government, some kind of International Parliament, an International
+Executive, and even an International Army and Navy--a so-called
+International Police--by the help of which the International Government
+could guarantee the condition of permanent peace in the world.
+
+II. You believe no doubt, because nearly everyone believes it, that the
+conception of a League of Nations is something quite new. Yet this is
+not the case, although there is something new in the present conception,
+something which did not exist previously. The conception of a League of
+Nations is very old, is indeed as old as modern International Law,
+namely about four hundred years. International Law could not have come
+into existence without at the same time calling into existence a League
+of Nations. _Any kind of an International Law and some kind or other of
+a League of Nations are interdependent and correlative._ This assertion
+possibly surprises you, and I must therefore say a few words concerning
+the origin of modern International Law in order to make matters clear.
+
+III. In ancient times no International Law in the modern sense of the
+term existed. It is true there existed rules of religion and of law
+concerning international relations, and ambassadors and heralds were
+everywhere considered sacrosanct. But these rules were not rules of an
+_International_ Law, they were either religious rules or rules which
+were part of the Municipal Law of the several States. For instance: the
+Romans had very detailed rules concerning their relations with other
+States in time of peace and war; but these were rules of Roman law, not
+rules of the law of other countries, and certainly not _international_
+rules.
+
+Now what was the reason that antiquity did not know of any International
+Law?
+
+The reason was that between the several independent States of antiquity
+no such intimate intercourse arose and no such common views existed as
+to necessitate a law between them. Only between the several city States
+of ancient Greece arose some kind of what we should now call
+'International Law,' because these city States formed a Community
+fostered by the same language, the same civilisation, the same religion,
+the same general ideas, and by constant commercial and other
+intercourse. On the other hand, the Roman Empire was a world empire, it
+gradually absorbed all the independent nations in the West. And when the
+Roman Empire fell to pieces in consequence of the migration of the
+peoples, the old civilisation came to an end, international commerce and
+intercourse ceased almost entirely, and it was not till towards the end
+of the Middle Ages that matters began to change.
+
+IV. During the second part of the Middle Ages more and more independent
+States arose on the European continent, and during the fifteenth and
+sixteenth centuries the necessity for a Law of Nations made itself felt.
+A multitude of Sovereign States had now established themselves which,
+although they were absolutely independent of one another, were knitted
+together by constant commercial and other intercourse, by a common
+religion, and by the same moral principles. Gradually and almost
+unconsciously the conviction had grown upon these independent States
+that, in spite of everything which separated them, they formed a
+Community the intercourse of which was ruled by certain legal
+principles. International Law grew out of custom because it was a
+necessity according to the well-known rule _ubi societas ibi jus_, where
+there is a community of interests there must be law. The several
+independent States had thus gradually and unconsciously formed
+themselves into a Society, the afterwards so-called Family of Nations,
+or, in other words, a League of Nations.
+
+And no sooner had this League of Nations come into existence--and even
+some time before that date--than a number of schemes for the
+establishment of eternal peace made their appearance.
+
+The first of these schemes was that of the French lawyer _Pierre
+Dubois_, who, as early as 1305, in his work 'De recuperatione terre
+sancte,' proposed an alliance between all Christian Powers for the
+purpose of the maintenance of peace and the establishment of a permanent
+Court of Arbitration for the settlement of differences between members
+of the alliance.
+
+Another was that of _Antoine Marini_, the Chancellor of Podiebrad, King
+of Bohemia, who adopted the scheme in 1461. This scheme proposed the
+foundation of a Federal State to comprise all the existing Christian
+States and the establishment of a permanent Congress to be seated at
+Basle in Switzerland, this Congress to be the highest organ of the
+Federation.
+
+A third scheme was that of _Sully_, adopted by Henri IV of France,
+which, in 1603, proposed the division of Europe into fifteen States and
+the linking together of these into a Federation with a General Council
+as its highest organ.
+
+And a fourth scheme was that of _Emeric Crucee_, who, in 1623, proposed
+the establishment of a Union consisting not only of the Christian States
+but of all States of the world, with a General Council seated at Venice.
+
+And since that time many other schemes of similar kind have made their
+appearance, the enumeration and discussion of which is outside our
+present purpose. So much is certain that all these schemes were Utopian.
+Nevertheless, a League of Nations having once come into existence,
+International Law grew more and more, and when in 1625 Hugo Grotius
+published his immortal work on 'The Law of War and Peace,' the system of
+International Law offered in his work conquered the world and became the
+basis of all following development.
+
+V. However, although a League of Nations must be said to have been in
+existence for about 400 years, because no International Law would have
+been possible without it, this League of Nations could not, and was not
+intended to, prevent war between its members. I say: it could not
+prevent war. Why not? It could not prevent war on account of the
+conditions which prevailed within the international society from the
+Middle Ages till, say, the outbreak of the present war. These conditions
+are intimately connected with the growth of the several States of
+Europe.
+
+Whereas the family, the tribe, and the race are natural products, the
+nation as well as the State are products of historical development. All
+nations are blends of more or less different races, and all States were
+originally founded on force: strong rulers subjected neighbouring tribes
+and peoples to their sway and thus formed coherent nations. Most of the
+States in Europe are the product of the activity of strong dynasties
+which through war and conquest, and through marriage and purchase,
+united under one sovereign the lands which form the States and the
+peoples which form the nations. Up to the time of the French Revolution,
+throughout the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, all
+wars were either wars of religion, or dynastic wars fought for the
+increase of the territory under the sway of the dynasties concerned, or
+so-called colonial wars fought for the acquisition of transoceanic
+colonies. It was not till the nineteenth century that wars for the
+purpose of national unity broke out, and dynastic wars began gradually
+to disappear. During the nineteenth century the nations, so to say,
+found themselves; some kind of constitutional government was everywhere
+introduced; and democracy became the ideal, although it was by no means
+everywhere realised.
+
+VI. It is for this reason that the outbreak of the present war is
+epoch-making, because it has become apparent that, whatever may be the
+war aims of the belligerents, at bottom this World War is a fight
+between the ideal of democracy and constitutional government on the one
+hand, and autocratic government and militarism on the other. Everywhere
+the conviction has become prevalent that things cannot remain as they
+were before the outbreak of the present war, and therefore the demand
+for a League of Nations, or--I had better say--for a new League of
+Nations to take the place of that which has been in existence for about
+400 years, has arisen.
+
+Now what is new in the desired new League of Nations?
+
+Firstly, this new League would be founded upon a solemn treaty, whereas
+the League of Nations hitherto was only based upon custom.
+
+Secondly, for the purpose of making war rarer or of abolishing it
+altogether, this new League of Nations would enact the rule that no
+State is allowed to resort to arms without previously having submitted
+the dispute to an International Court or a Council of Conciliation.
+
+Thirdly, this new League of Nations would be compelled to create some
+kind of organisation for itself, because otherwise it could not realise
+its purpose to make war rarer or abolish it altogether.
+
+VII. The demand for a new League of Nations is universal, for it is
+made, not only everywhere in the allied countries, but in the countries
+of the Central Powers, and it will surely be realised when the war is
+over, at any rate to a certain extent. It is for this reason that the
+present World War has not only not destroyed so-called Internationalism,
+but has done more for it than many years of peace could have done.
+
+What is Internationalism?
+
+Internationalism is the conviction that all the civilised States form
+one Community throughout the world in spite of the various factors which
+separate the nations from one another; the conviction that the interests
+of all the nations and States are indissolubly interknitted, and that,
+therefore, the Family of Nations must establish international
+institutions for the purpose of guaranteeing a more general and a more
+lasting peace than existed in former times. Internationalism had made
+great strides during the second part of the nineteenth century on
+account of the enormous development of international commerce and
+international communication favoured by railways, the steamship, the
+telegraph, and a great many scientific discoveries and technical
+inventions. But what a disturbing and destroying factor war really is,
+had not become fully apparent till the present war, because this is a
+_world_ war which interferes almost as much with the welfare of neutrals
+as with the welfare of belligerents. It has become apparent during the
+present war that the discoveries and developments of science and
+technology, which had done so much during the second half of the
+nineteenth century for the material welfare of the human race during
+peace, were likewise at the disposal of belligerents for an enormous,
+and hitherto unthought-of, destruction of life and wealth. It is for
+this reason that in the camp of friend and foe, among neutrals as well
+as among belligerents, the conviction has become universal that the
+conditions of international life prevailing before the outbreak of the
+World War must be altered; that international institutions must be
+established which will make the outbreak of war, if not impossible, at
+any rate only an exceptional possibility. The demand for a new League of
+Nations has thus arisen and peremptorily requires fulfilment.
+
+VIII. However, in considering the demand for a new League of Nations, it
+is necessary to avoid confusing nations with States. It should always be
+remembered that, when we speak of a League of Nations, we do not really
+mean a League of Nations but a League of States. It is true that there
+are many States in existence which in the main are made up of one
+nation, although fractions of other nations may be comprised in them.
+But it is equally true that there are some States in existence which
+include members of several nations. Take as an example Switzerland
+which, although only a very small State, nevertheless comprises three
+national elements, namely German, French, and Italian. Another example
+is the British Empire, which is a world empire and comprises a number of
+different nations.
+
+That leads me to the question: What is a nation?
+
+A nation must not be confounded with a race. A nation is a product of
+historical development, whereas a race is a product of natural growth.
+One speaks of a nation when a complex body of human beings is united by
+living in the same land, by the same language, the same literature, the
+same historical traditions, and the same general views of life. All
+nations are a mixture of several diverse racial elements which in the
+course of historical development have to a certain extent been united by
+force of circumstances. The Swiss as a people are politically a nation,
+although the component parts of the population of Switzerland are of
+different national characters and even speak different languages.
+Historical development in general, and in many cases force in
+particular, have played a great part in the blending of diverse racial
+elements into nations; just as they have played a great part in the
+building up of States. The demand that every nation should have a
+separate State of its own--the ideal of the so-called national
+State--appears very late in history; it is a product of the last two
+centuries, and it was not till the second half of the nineteenth century
+that the so-called principle of nationality made its appearance and
+gained great influence. It may well be doubted whether each nation, be
+it ever so small, will succeed in establishing a separate State of its
+own, although where national consciousness becomes overwhelmingly
+strong, it will probably in every case succeed in time either in
+establishing a State of its own, or at any rate in gaining autonomy. Be
+that as it may, it is a question for the future; so much is certain,
+what is intended now to be realised, is not a League of Nations, but a
+League of States, although it is called a League of Nations.
+
+IX. However, no League of Nations is possible unless the Central Powers,
+and Germany in especial, are utterly defeated during the World War, and
+that for two reasons.
+
+One reason is that a great alteration of the map of Europe is an
+absolutely necessary condition for the satisfactory working of a League
+of Nations. Unless an independent Poland be established; unless the
+problem of Alsace-Lorraine be solved; unless the Trentino be handed over
+to Italy; unless the Yugo-Slavs be united with Servia; unless the
+Czecho-Slovaks be freed from the Austrian yoke; and unless the problem
+of Turkey and the Turkish Straits be solved, no lasting peace can be
+expected in Europe, even if a League of Nations be established.
+
+The other reason is that, unless Germany be utterly defeated, the spirit
+of militarism, which is not compatible with a League of Nations, will
+remain a menace to the world.
+
+What is militarism? It is that conception of the State which bases the
+power of the State, its influence, its progress, and its development
+exclusively on military force. The consequence is that war becomes part
+of the settled policy of a militarist State; the acquisition of further
+territory and population by conquest is continually before the eyes of
+such a Government; and the condition of peace is only a shorter or
+longer interval between periods of war. A military State submits to
+International Law only so long as it serves its interests, but violates
+International Law, and particularly International Law concerning war,
+wherever and whenever this law stands in the way of its military aims.
+The whole history of Prussia exemplifies this. Now in a League of
+Nations peace must be the normal condition. If war occurs at all within
+such a League, it can only be an exceptional phase and must be only for
+the purpose of re-establishing peace. It is true a League of Nations
+will not be able entirely to dispense with military force, yet such
+force appears only in the background as an _ultima ratio_ to be applied
+against such Power as refuses to submit its disagreements with other
+members of the League either to an International Court of Justice or an
+International Council of Conciliation.
+
+X. Be that as it may, in a sense the League of Nations has already
+started its career, because twenty-five States are united on the one
+side and are fighting this war in vindication of International Law.
+These States are--I enumerate them chronologically as they entered into
+the war:--Russia (the Bolsheviks have made peace, but in fact one may
+still enumerate Russia as a belligerent), France, Belgium, Great
+Britain, Servia, Montenegro, Japan, San Marino, Portugal, Italy,
+Roumania, the United States, Cuba, Panama, Greece, Siam, Liberia, China,
+Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Haiti, Honduras.
+Besides these twenty-five States which are at war with the Central
+Powers, the following four States, without having declared war, have
+broken off diplomatic relations with Germany, namely: Bolivia, San
+Domingo, Peru, Uruguay.
+
+Now there may be said to be about fifty civilised States in existence.
+Of these, as I have just pointed out, twenty-five are fighting against
+the Central Powers, four have broken off relations with Germany, the
+Central Powers themselves are four in number, with the consequence that
+thirty-three of the fifty States are implicated in the war. Only the
+seventeen remaining States are neutral, namely: Sweden, Norway, Denmark,
+Holland, Luxemburg, Switzerland, Spain, Lichtenstein, and Monaco in
+Europe; Mexico, Salvador, Colombia, Venezuela, Chile, Argentina, and
+Paraguay in America; and Persia in Asia.
+
+It may be taken for granted that all the neutral States, and all the
+States fighting on the side of the Allies, and also the four States
+which, although they are not fighting on the side of the Allies, have
+broken off relations with Germany, are prepared to enter into a League
+of Nations.
+
+But what about the Central Powers, and Germany in especial? I shall
+discuss in my next lecture the question whether the Central Powers are
+to become members of the League. To-day it must suffice to say that,
+when once utterly defeated, they will be only too glad to be received as
+members. On the other hand, if they were excluded, the world would again
+be divided into two rival camps, just as before the war the Triple
+Alliance was faced by the Entente. No disarmament would be possible, and
+with regard to every other matter progress would be equally impossible.
+Therefore the Central Powers must become members of a League of Nations
+for such a League to be of any great use, which postulates as a _sine
+qua non_ that Germany must be utterly defeated in the present war. If
+she were victorious, or if peace were concluded with an undefeated
+Germany, the world would not be ripe for a League of Nations because
+militarism would not have been exterminated.
+
+XI. I have hitherto discussed the League of Nations only in a general
+way, without mentioning that there is no unanimity concerning its aims
+or concerning the details of its organisation. Many people think that it
+would be possible to do away with war for ever, and they therefore
+demand a World State, a Federal State comprising all the single States
+of the world on the pattern of the United States of America. And for
+this reason the demand is raised not only for an International Court and
+for an International Council of Conciliation, but also for an
+International Government, an International Parliament, and an
+International Army and Navy,--a so-called International Police.
+
+I believe that these demands go much too far and are impossible of
+realisation. A Federal State comprising all the single States of the
+whole civilised world is a Utopia, and an International Army and Navy
+would be a danger to the peace of the world.
+
+Why is a World State not possible, at any rate not in our time?
+
+No one has ever thought that a World State in the form of one single
+State with one single Government would be possible. Those who plead for
+a World State plead for it in the form of a Federal State comprising all
+the single States of the world on the pattern of the United States of
+America. But even this modified ideal is not, in my opinion, realisable
+at present. Why not? To realise this ideal there would be required a
+Federal Government, and a Federal Parliament; and the Federal Government
+would have to possess strong powers to enforce its demands. A powerless
+Federal Government would be worse than no government at all. But how is
+it possible to establish at present a powerful Federal Government over
+the whole world? How is it possible to establish a Federal World
+Parliament?
+
+Constitutional Government within the several States has to grapple with
+many difficulties, and these difficulties would be more numerous,
+greater, and much more complicated within a Federal World State. We need
+democracy and constitutional Government in every single State, and this
+can only be realised by party Government and elections of Parliament at
+short intervals. The waves of party strife rise high within the several
+States; no sooner is one party in, than the other party looks out for an
+opening into which a wedge can be pushed to turn the Government out. In
+normal times this works on the whole quite well within the borders of
+the several States, because the interests concerned are not so widely
+opposed to one another that the several parties cannot alternatively
+govern. But when it comes to applying the same system of Government to a
+Federal World State, the interests at stake are too divergent. The East
+and the West, the South and the North, the interests of maritime States
+and land-locked States, the ideals and interests of industrial and
+agricultural States, and many other contrasts, are too great for it to
+be possible to govern a Federal World State by the same institutions as
+a State of ordinary size and composition.
+
+The British World Empire may be taken as an example to show that it is
+impossible for one single central Government to govern a number of
+States with somewhat divergent interests. We all know that the British
+Empire comprising the United Kingdom and the so-called independent
+dominions, namely Canada, Newfoundland, Australia, New Zealand, and
+South Africa, is kept together not really by the powers of the British
+Government but by the good will of the component parts. The Government
+of the United Kingdom could not keep the Empire together by force, could
+not compel by force one of the independent dominions to submit to a
+demand, in case it refused to comply. The interests of the several
+component parts of the British Empire are so divergent that no central
+Government could keep them together against their will. Now what applies
+to the British Empire, which is to a great extent bound together by the
+same language, the same literature, and the same Law, would apply much
+more to a Federal State comprising the whole of the world: such a
+Federal State, so far as we can see, is impossible.
+
+XII. But what about an International Army and Navy?
+
+It is hardly worth while to say much about them. Those who propose the
+establishment of an International Army and Navy presuppose that the
+national armies and navies would be abolished so that the world
+Government would have the power, with the help of the International Army
+and Navy, at any moment to crush any attempt of a recalcitrant member of
+the Federal World State to avoid its duties. This International Army and
+Navy would be the most powerful instrument of force which the world has
+ever seen, because every attempt to resist it would be futile. And the
+Commander of the International Army and the Commander of the
+International Navy would be men holding in their hands the greatest
+power that can be imagined.
+
+The old question therefore arises: _Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?_
+which I should like here to translate freely by: Who will keep in order
+those who are to keep the world in order? A League of Nations which can
+only be kept together by a powerful International Army and Navy, is a
+contradiction in itself; for the independence and equality of the member
+States of the League would soon disappear. It is a fact--I make this
+statement although I am sure it will be violently contradicted--that,
+just as hitherto, so within a League of Nations some kind of Balance of
+Power only can guarantee the independence and equality of the smaller
+States. For the Community of Power, on which the League of Nations must
+rest, would at once disappear if one or two members of the League became
+so powerful that they could disregard the combined power of the other
+members. Every scheme of this movement must therefore see to it that no
+member of the League is more armed than is necessary considering the
+extent of its territory and other factors concerned. But be that as it
+may, an International Army and Navy is practically impossible, just as a
+Federal World State is impossible.
+
+XIII. Yet while a Federal World State is impossible, a League of Nations
+is not, provided such league gives itself a constitution, not of a
+state-like character, but one _sui generis_. What can be done is this:
+the hitherto unorganised Family of Nations can organise itself on simple
+lines so as to secure, on the one hand, the absolute independence of
+every State, and, on the other hand, the peaceful co-existence of all
+the States.
+
+It is possible, in my opinion, to establish an International Court of
+Justice before which the several States engage to appear in case a
+conflict arises between two or more of them which can be judicially
+settled, that is, can be settled by a rule of law. There is as little
+reason why two or more States should go to war on account of a conflict
+which can be settled upon the basis of law, as there is for two private
+individuals to resort to arms in case of a dispute between them which
+can be decided by a Court of Law.
+
+Again, although there will frequently arise between States conflicts of
+a political character which cannot be settled on the basis of a rule of
+law, there is no reason why, when the States in conflict cannot settle
+them by diplomatic negotiation, they should resort to arms, before
+bringing the conflict before some Council of Conciliation and giving the
+latter an opportunity of investigating the matter and proposing a fair
+compromise.
+
+Under modern conditions of civilisation the whole world suffers in case
+war breaks out between even only two States, and for this reason it is
+advisable that the rest of the world should unite and oppose such State
+as would resort to arms without having submitted its case to an
+International Court of Justice or an International Council of
+Conciliation.
+
+XIV. In my opinion the aims of a League of Nations should therefore be
+three:
+
+The first aim should be to prevent the outbreak of war altogether on
+account of so-called judicial disputes, that is disputes which can be
+settled on the basis of a rule of law. For this reason the League should
+stipulate that every State must submit all judicial disputes without
+exception to an International Court of Justice and must abide by the
+judgment of such Court.
+
+The second aim should be to prevent the sudden outbreak of war on
+account of a political dispute and to insist on an opportunity for
+mediation. For this reason the League should stipulate that every State,
+previous to resorting to arms over a political dispute, must submit it
+to an International Council of Conciliation and must at any rate listen
+to the advice of such Council.
+
+The third aim should be to provide a sanction for the enforcement of the
+two rules just mentioned. For this reason the League should stipulate
+that all the member States of the League must unite their economic,
+military, and naval forces against such member or members as would
+resort to arms either on account of a judicial dispute which ought to
+have been settled by an International Court of Justice, or on account of
+a political dispute without previously having submitted it to an
+International Council of Conciliation and listened to the latter's
+advice.
+
+These should be, in my opinion, the three aims of a League of Nations
+and the three rules necessary for the realisation of these aims.
+However, it is not so easy to realise them, and it is therefore
+necessary to face and solve four problems: There is, firstly, the
+problem of the Organisation of the League; secondly, the problem of
+Legislation within the League; thirdly, the problem of Administration of
+Justice within the League; and fourthly, the problem of Mediation within
+the League--four problems which I shall discuss in the two following
+lectures.
+
+I have only named three aims and four problems because I have in my mind
+those aims which are the nearest and those problems which are the most
+pressing and the most urgent. The range of vision of the League of
+Nations, when once established, will no doubt gradually become wider and
+wider; new aims will arise and new problems will demand solution, but
+all such possible future aims and future problems are outside the scope
+of these lectures.
+
+
+
+
+SECOND LECTURE
+
+ORGANISATION AND LEGISLATION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+
+    I. The Community of civilised States, the at present existing League
+    of Nations, is a community without any organisation, although there
+    are plenty of legal rules for the intercourse of the several States
+    one with another.
+
+    II. The position of the Great Powers within the Community of States
+    is a mere political fact not based on Law.
+
+    III. The pacifistic demand for a Federal World State in order to
+    make the abolition of war a possibility.
+
+    IV. Every attempt at organising the desired new League of Nations
+    must start from, and keep intact, the independence and equality of
+    the several States, with the consequence that the establishment of a
+    central political authority above the sovereign States is an
+    impossibility.
+
+    V. The development of an organisation of the Community of States
+    began before the outbreak of the World War and is to be found in the
+    establishment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague by
+    the First Hague Peace Conference of 1899. But more steps will be
+    necessary to turn the hitherto unorganised Community of States into
+    an organised League of Nations.
+
+    VI. The organisation of the desired new League of Nations should
+    start from the beginning made by the Hague Peace Conferences, and
+    the League should therefore include all the independent civilised
+    States.
+
+    VII. The objection to the reception of the Central Powers, and of
+    Germany especially, into the League.
+
+    VIII. The objection to the reception of the minor transoceanic
+    States into the League.
+
+    IX. The seven principles which ought to be accepted with regard to
+    the organisation of the new League of Nations.
+
+    X. The organisation of the League of Nations is not an end in itself
+    but only a means of attaining three objects, the first of which is
+    International Legislation. The meaning of the term 'International
+    Legislation' in contradistinction to Municipal Legislation.
+    International Legislation in the past and in the future.
+
+    XI. The difficulty in the way of International Legislation on
+    account of the language question.
+
+    XII. The difficulty created by the conflicting national interests of
+    the several States.
+
+    XIII. The difficulty caused by the fact that International Statutes
+    cannot be created by a majority vote of the States. The difference
+    between universal and general International Law offers a way out.
+
+    XIV. The difficulty created by the fact that there are as yet no
+    universally recognised rules concerning interpretation and
+    construction of International Statutes and ordinary conventions. The
+    notorious Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+    Warfare.
+
+
+THE LECTURE
+
+
+I. In my first lecture on the League of Nations I recommended the
+following three rules to be laid down by a League of Nations:
+
+Firstly, every State must submit all judicial disputes to an
+International Court of Justice and must abide by the judgment of such
+Court.
+
+Secondly, every State previous to resorting to arms, must submit every
+political and non-judicial dispute to an International Council of
+Conciliation and must at any rate listen to the advice of such Council.
+
+Thirdly, the member States must unite their forces against such State or
+States as should resort to arms without previously having submitted the
+matter in dispute to an International Court of Justice or to an
+International Council of Conciliation.
+
+And I added that these three rules cannot create a satisfactory
+condition of affairs unless four problems are faced and solved, namely:
+The Organisation of the League, Legislation by the League,
+Administration of Justice and Mediation within the League. My lecture
+to-day will deal with two of these problems, namely the Organisation and
+the Legislation of the League.
+
+Let us first consider the Organisation of the League. Hitherto the body
+of civilised States which form the Family of Nations and which, as I
+pointed out in my first lecture, is really a League of Nations evolved
+by custom, has been an unorganised Community. This means that, although
+there are plenty of legal rules for the intercourse of the several
+States one with another, the Community of civilised States does not
+possess any permanently established organs or agents for the conduct of
+its common affairs. At present these affairs, if they are peaceably
+settled, are either settled by ordinary diplomatic negotiation or, if
+the matter is pressing and of the greatest importance, by temporarily
+convened International Conferences or Congresses.
+
+II. It is true there are the so-called Great Powers which are the
+leaders of the Family of Nations, and it is therefore asserted by some
+authorities that the Community of States has acquired a certain amount
+of organisation because the Great Powers are the legally recognised
+superiors of the minor States.
+
+But is this assertion correct? The Great Powers, are they really the
+legally recognised superiors of the minor States?
+
+I deny it. A Great Power is any large-sized State possessing a large
+population which gains such economic, military, and naval strength that
+its political influence must be reckoned with by all the other Powers.
+At the time of the outbreak of the World War eight States had to be
+considered as Great Powers, namely Great Britain, Austria-Hungary,
+France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the United States of America, and Japan.
+But it is very probable that the end of the World War will see the
+number of Great Powers reduced to six. The collapse and break up of
+Russia has surely for the present eliminated her from the number of
+Great Powers. And it is quite certain that Austria-Hungary will not
+emerge from the struggle as a Great Power, if she emerges from it as a
+whole at all. History teaches that the number of the Great Powers is by
+no means stable, and changes occasionally take place. Look at the
+condition of affairs during the nineteenth century. Whereas at the time
+of the Vienna Congress in 1815 eight States, namely Great Britain,
+Austria, France, Portugal, Prussia, Spain, Sweden, and Russia were still
+considered Great Powers, their number soon decreased to five, because
+Portugal, Spain, and Sweden ceased to be Great Powers. On the other
+hand, Italy joined the number of the Great Powers after her unification
+in 1860; the United States of America joined the Great Powers after the
+American Civil War in 1865; and Japan emerged as a Great Power from her
+war with China in 1895.
+
+Be that as it may, so much is certain, a State is a Great Power not by
+law but only by its political influence. The Great Powers are the
+leaders of the Family of Nations because their political influence is
+so great. Their political and economic influence is in the long run
+irresistible; therefore all arrangements made by the Great Powers
+naturally in most cases gain, either at once or in time, the consent of
+the minor States. It may be said that the Great Powers exercise a kind
+of political hegemony within the Family of Nations. Yet this hegemony is
+not based on law, it is simply a political fact, and it is certainly not
+a consequence of an organisation of the Family of Nations.
+
+III. The demand for a proper organisation of the Community of States
+had, up to the outbreak of the World War, been raised exclusively on the
+part of the so-called Pacifists in order to make the abolition of war a
+possibility. It is a common assertion on the part of the Pacifists that
+War cannot die out so long as there is no Central Political Authority in
+existence above the several States which could compel them to bring
+their disputes before an International Court and also compel them to
+carry out the judgments of such a Court. For this reason many Pacifists
+aim at such an organisation of the Community of States as would bring
+all the civilised States of the world within the bonds of a federation.
+They demand a World Federation of all the civilised States, or at any
+rate a federation of the States of Europe, on the model of the United
+States of America.
+
+If such a Federal World State were practically possible, there would be
+no objection to it, although International Law as such would cease to
+exist and be replaced by the Constitutional Law of this Federal World
+State. But in my first lecture I pointed out that such a Federal World
+State is practically impossible. And it is not even desirable.
+
+The development of mankind would seem in the main to be indissolubly
+connected with the national development of the peoples. Most peoples
+possessing a strong national consciousness desire an independent State
+in which they can live according to their own ideals. They want to be
+their own masters, and not to be part and parcel of a Federal World
+State to which they would have to surrender a great part of their
+independence. Moreover--as I likewise pointed out in my first lecture
+(pp. 18-20)--it would be impossible to establish a strong Government and
+a strong Parliament in a Federal World State.
+
+However this may be, it is not at all certain that war would altogether
+disappear in a Federal World State. The history of Federal States
+teaches that wars do occasionally break out between their member States.
+Think of the war between the Roman Catholic and the Protestant member
+States of the Swiss Confederation in 1847, of the war in 1863 between
+the Northern and the Southern member States within the Federation which
+is called the United States of America, and of the war between Prussia
+and Austria within the German Confederation in 1866.
+
+IV. But what kind of organisation of the League of Nations is possible
+if we reject the idea of a Federal State?
+
+Neither I, nor anyone else who does not like to build castles in the
+air, can answer this question directly by making a detailed proposal. It
+is at present quite impossible to work out a practical scheme according
+to which a more detailed organisation of the League of Nations could be
+realised. But so much is certain that every attempt at organising this
+League must start from, and must keep intact, the independence and the
+equality of all civilised States. It is for this reason that a Central
+Political Authority above the sovereign States can never be thought of.
+Every attempt to organise a League of Nations on the model of a Federal
+State is futile. If a detailed organisation of the League should ever
+come, it will be one _sui generis_, one absolutely of its own kind; such
+as has never been seen before. And it is at present quite impossible to
+map out a detailed plan of such an organisation although, as I shall
+have to show you later, the first step towards an organisation has
+already been made, and further steps towards the ideal can be taken. The
+reason that it is at present impossible is that the growth and the final
+shape of the organisation of the League of Nations will, and must, go
+hand in hand with the progress of International Law. But the progress of
+International Law is conditioned by the growth, the strengthening, and
+the deepening of international economic and other interests, and of
+international morality. It is a matter of course that this progress can
+only be realised very slowly, for there is concerned a process of
+development through many generations and perhaps through centuries, a
+development whose end no one can foresee. It is sufficient for us to
+state that the development had already begun before the World War, and
+to try to foster it, as far as is in our power, after the conclusion of
+peace.
+
+V. I said that this development has begun. Where is this beginning of
+the development to be found?
+
+It is to be found in the establishment of the Permanent Court of
+Arbitration at the Hague and the Office therewith connected. The
+Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an institution of the several
+States, but an institution of the Community of States in
+contradistinction to its several members. Had the International Prize
+Court agreed upon by the Second Hague Peace Conference of 1907 been
+established, there would have come into existence another institution of
+the Community of States.
+
+But the establishment of International Courts would not justify the
+assertion that thereby the Community of States has turned from an
+unorganised community into an organised community. To reach this goal
+another step is required, namely an agreement amongst the Powers,
+according to which the Hague Peace Conferences would be made a permanent
+institution which periodically, within fixed intervals, assemble without
+being convened by one Power or another. If this were done, we could say
+that the hitherto unorganised Community of States had turned into an
+organised League of Nations, for by such periodically assembling Hague
+Peace Conferences there would be established an organ for the conduct
+of all such international matters as require international legislation
+or other international action.
+
+However that may be, the organisation created by the fact that the Hague
+Peace Conferences periodically assembled, would only be an immature one;
+more steps would be necessary in order that the organisation of the
+Community of States might become more perfect and more efficient. Yet
+progress would be slow, for every attempt at a progressive step meets
+with opposition, and it would be only when the _international_ interests
+of the civilised States become victorious over their particular
+_national_ interests that the Community of States would gradually
+receive a more perfect organisation.
+
+VI. There is no doubt that the experiences of mankind during the World
+War have been quickening development more than could have been expected
+in normal times. The universal demand for a new League of Nations
+accepting the principles that every judicial dispute amongst nations
+must be settled by International Courts and that every political dispute
+must, before the parties resort to arms, be brought before a Council of
+Conciliation, demonstrates clearly that the Community of States must now
+deliberately give itself some kind of organisation, because without it
+the principles just mentioned cannot be realised.
+
+Now a number of schemes for the organisation of a new League of Nations
+have been made public. They all agree upon the three aims of the League
+and the three rules for the realisation of these aims which I mentioned
+in my first lecture, namely compulsory settlement of all judicial
+disputes by International Courts of Justice, compulsory mediation in
+cases of political disputes by an International Council of Conciliation,
+and the duty of the members of the League to turn against any one member
+which should resort to arms in violation of the principles laid down by
+the League. However, these schemes differ very much with regard to the
+_organisation_ of the League. I cannot now discuss the various schemes
+in detail. It must suffice to say that some of them embody proposals for
+a more or less state-like organisation and are therefore not acceptable
+to those who share my opinion that any state-like organisation of the
+League is practically impossible. But though some of the schemes, as for
+instance that of Lord Bryce and that of Sir Willoughby Dickinson, avoid
+this mistake, none of them take as their starting point that which I
+consider to be the right one, namely the beginning made at the two Hague
+Peace Conferences. _In my opinion the organisation of a new League of
+Nations should start from the beginning made by the two Hague Peace
+Conferences._
+
+VII. However, there is much objection to this, because it would
+necessitate the admission into the new League of all those States which
+took part in the Second Hague Peace Conference, including, of course,
+the Central Powers. The objections to such a wide range of the League
+are two-fold.
+
+In the first instance, the admission of the Central Powers, and
+especially of Germany, into the League is deprecated. By her attack on
+Belgium at the outbreak of the war, and by her general conduct of the
+war, Germany has deliberately taken up an attitude which proves that,
+when her military interests are concerned, she does not consider herself
+bound by any treaty, by any rule of law, or by any principle of
+humanity. How can we expect that she will carry out the engagements into
+which she might enter by becoming a member of the League of Nations?
+
+My answer is that, provided she be utterly defeated and no peace of
+compromise be made with her, militarism in Germany will be doomed, the
+reparation to be exacted from her for the many cruel wrongs must lead to
+a change of Constitution and Government, and this change of Constitution
+and Government will make Germany a more acceptable member of a new
+League of Nations. The utter defeat of Germany is a necessary
+preliminary condition to the possibility of her entrance into a League
+of Nations. Those who speak of the foundation of a League of Nations as
+a means of ending the World War by a peace of compromise with Germany
+are mistaken. The necessary presuppositions of such a League are
+entirely incompatible with an unbroken Prussian militarism.
+
+But while her utter defeat is the necessary preliminary condition to her
+entrance into a League of Nations, the inclusion of Germany in the
+League, after her utter defeat, is likewise a necessity. The reason is
+that, as I pointed out in my first lecture (p. 17), in case the Central
+Powers were excluded from the League, they would enter into a League of
+their own, and the world would then be divided into two rival camps, in
+the same way as before the war the Triple Alliance was faced by the
+Entente. _The world would be proved not ripe for a new League of Nations
+if peace were concluded with an undefeated Germany; and the League would
+miss its purpose if to a defeated and repenting Germany entrance into it
+were refused._
+
+VIII. In the second instance, the entrance of the great number of minor
+transoceanic States into the League is deprecated because these States
+would claim an equal vote with the European Powers and thereby obstruct
+progress within the League.
+
+It is asserted that some of the minor transatlantic States made the
+discussions at the Hague Conferences futile by their claim to an equal
+vote. Now it is true that some of these States have to a certain extent
+impeded the work of the Hague Conferences, but some of the minor States
+of Europe, and even some of the Great Powers, have done likewise. The
+Community of States consisting of sovereign States does not possess any
+means of compelling a minority of States to fall in with the views of
+the majority, but I shall show you very soon, when I approach the
+problem of International Legislation, that International Legislation of
+a kind is possible in spite of this fact. And so much is certain that
+the minimum of organisation of the new League which is now necessary,
+cannot be considered to be endangered by the admittance of the minor
+transoceanic States into the League. Progress will in any case be slow,
+and perfect unanimity among the Powers will in any and every case only
+be possible where the _international_ interests of all the Powers compel
+them to put aside their real or imaginary particular _national_
+interests.
+
+IX. For these reasons I take it for granted that the organisation of a
+new League of Nations should start from the beginning made by the Hague
+Peace Conferences. Therefore the following seven principles ought to be
+accepted:
+
+    First principle: The League of Nations is composed of all civilised
+    States which recognise one another's external and internal
+    independence and absolute equality before International Law.
+
+    Second principle: The chief organ of the League is the Peace
+    Conference at the Hague. The Peace Conferences meet
+    periodically--say every two or three years--without being convened
+    by any special Power. Their task is the gradual codification of
+    International Law and the agreement upon such International
+    Conventions as are from time to time necessitated by new
+    circumstances and conditions.
+
+    Third principle: A permanent Council of the Conference is to be
+    created, the members of which are to be resident at the Hague and
+    are to conduct all the current business of the League of Nations.
+    This current business comprises: The preparation of the meetings of
+    the Peace Conference; the conduct of communications with the several
+    members of the League with regard to the preparation of the work of
+    the Peace Conferences; and all other matters of international
+    interest which the Conference from time to time hands over to the
+    Council.
+
+    Fourth principle: Every recognised sovereign State has a right to
+    take part in the Peace Conferences.
+
+    Fifth principle: Resolutions of the Conference can come into force
+    only in so far as they become ratified by the several States
+    concerned. On the other hand, every State agrees once for all
+    faithfully to carry out those resolutions which have been ratified
+    by it.
+
+    Sixth principle: Every State that takes part in the Peace
+    Conferences is bound only by such resolutions of the Conferences as
+    it expressly agrees to and ratifies. Resolutions of a majority only
+    bind the majority. On the other hand, no State has a right to demand
+    that only such resolutions as it agrees to shall be adopted.
+
+    Seventh principle: All members of the League of Nations agree once
+    for all to submit all judicial disputes to International Courts
+    which are to be set up, and to abide by their judgments. They
+    likewise agree to submit, previous to resorting to arms, all
+    non-judicial disputes to International Councils of Conciliation
+    which are to be set up. And they all agree to unite their economic,
+    military, and naval forces against any one or more States which
+    resort to arms without submitting their disputes to International
+    Courts of Justice or International Councils of Conciliation.
+
+You will have noticed that my proposals do not comprise the creation of
+an International Government, an International Executive, an
+International Parliament, and an International Army and Navy which would
+serve as an International Police Force. No one can look into the future
+and say what it will bring, but it is certain that for the present, and
+for some generations to come, all attempts at creating an International
+Government are not only futile but dangerous; because it is almost
+certain that a League of Nations comprising an International Executive,
+an International Parliament, and an International Army and Navy would
+soon collapse.
+
+X. However this may be, and whatever may be the details of the
+organisation of the League, such necessary organisation is not an end in
+itself but a means of attaining three objects, namely: International
+Legislation, International Administration of Justice, and International
+Mediation. I shall discuss International Administration of Justice and
+International Mediation in my next lecture, to-day I will only draw your
+attention to International Legislation.
+
+In using the term 'International Legislation,' it must be understood
+that 'legislation' is here to be understood in a figurative sense only.
+When we speak of legislation in everyday language, we mean that process
+of parliamentary activity by which Municipal Statutes are called into
+existence. Municipal Legislation presupposes a sovereign power, which
+prescribes rules of conduct to its subjects. It is obvious that within
+the Community of States no such kind of legislation can take place.
+Rules of conduct for the members of the League of Nations can only be
+created by an agreement amongst those members. Whereas Municipal
+Statutes contain the rules of conduct set by an authority sovereign over
+its subjects, International Statutes--if I may be allowed to use that
+term--contain rules of conduct which the members of the Community of
+States have agreed to set for themselves. International Statutes are
+created by the so-called Law-making Treaties of the Powers. But in one
+point Municipal Legislation and the Law-making Treaties of the Powers
+resemble one another very closely:--both intend to create law, and for
+this reason it is permissible to use the term 'International
+Legislation' figuratively for the conclusion of such international
+treaties as contain rules of International Law.
+
+Now it would be very misleading to believe that no International
+Legislation has taken place in the past. The fact is that, from the
+Vienna Congress of 1815 onwards, agreements have been arrived at upon a
+number of rules of International Law. However, such agreements have only
+occurred occasionally, because the Community of civilised States has not
+hitherto possessed a permanently established organ for legislating. Much
+of the legislation which has taken place in the past was only a
+by-product of Congresses or Conferences which had assembled for other
+purposes. On the other hand, when legislation on a certain subject was
+considered pressing, a Congress or Conference was convened for that
+very purpose. It will be only when the Hague Peace Conferences have
+become permanently established that an organ of the League of Nations
+for legislating internationally will be at hand. And a wide field is
+open for such legislation. The bulk of International Law in its present
+state is--if I may say so--a book law, it is customary law which is only
+to be found in text-books of International Law; it is, as regards many
+points, controversial; it has many gaps; and it is in many ways
+uncertain. International Legislation will be able gradually to create
+international statutes which will turn this book law into firm, clear,
+and authoritative statutory law.
+
+XI. But you must not imagine that International Legislation is an easy
+matter. It is in fact full of difficulties of all kinds. I will only
+mention four:
+
+There is, firstly, the language question. Since it is impossible to
+draft International Statutes in all languages, it is absolutely
+necessary to agree upon one language, and this language at present is,
+as you all know, French. Yet, difficult as the language question is, it
+is not insurmountable. It is hardly greater than the difficulty which
+arises when two States, which speak different languages, have to agree
+upon an ordinary convention. One point, however, must be specially
+observed, and that is: when any question of the interpretation of an
+International Statute occurs, it is the French text of the statute which
+is authoritative, and not the text of the translation into other
+languages.
+
+XII. Another difficulty with regard to International Legislation is the
+conflicting _national_ interests of the different States. As
+International Statutes are only possible when the several States come to
+an agreement, it will often not be possible to legislate internationally
+on a given matter, because the interests of the different States will be
+so conflicting that an agreement cannot be arrived at. On the other
+hand, as time goes on the international interests of the several States
+frequently become so powerful that these Governments are quite ready to
+brush aside their particular interests, and to agree upon a compromise
+which makes International Legislation concerning the matter in question
+possible.
+
+XIII. A third difficulty with regard to International Legislation is of
+quite a particular kind. It arises from the fact that International
+Statutes cannot be created by a vote of the majority of States, but only
+by a unanimous vote of all the members of the Community of civilised
+States.
+
+This difficulty, however, can be overcome by dropping the contention
+that no legislation of any kind can be proceeded with unless every
+member of the League of Nations agrees to it. It is a well-known fact
+that a distinction has to be made between _universal_ International Law,
+that is, rules to which every civilised State agrees, and _general_
+International Law, that is, rules to which only the greater number of
+States agree. Now it is quite certain that no universal International
+Law can be created by legislation to which not every member of the
+League of Nations has agreed. Nothing, however, ought to prevent those
+States which are ready to agree to certain new rules of International
+Law, from legislating _for their own number_ on a certain matter. If
+such legislation is really of value, the time will come when the
+dissenting States will gradually accede. The Second Hague Peace
+Conference acted on this principle, for a good many of its Conventions
+were only agreed upon by the greater number, and not by all, of the
+participating States.
+
+XIV. A fourth difficulty with regard to International Legislation is the
+difficulty of the interpretation of, and the construction to be put
+upon, International Statutes as well as ordinary international
+conventions. We do not as yet possess universally recognised rules of
+International Law concerning such interpretation and construction. Each
+nation applies to International Statutes those rules of interpretation
+and construction which are valid for the interpretation and construction
+of their Municipal Statutes.
+
+Many international disputes have been due in the past to this difficulty
+of interpretation and construction. A notorious example is that of the
+interpretation of Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations of 1907
+concerning Land Warfare, which lays down the rule that it is forbidden
+'to declare abolished, suspended, or inadmissible in a Court of Law the
+rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party.'
+
+Germany and other continental States interpret this article to mean that
+the Municipal Law of a State is not allowed to declare that the
+outbreak of war suspends or avoids contracts with alien enemies, or
+that war prevents alien enemies from bringing an action in the Courts.
+
+On the other hand, England and the United States of America interpret
+this article to mean merely that the _occupant of enemy territory_ is
+prohibited from declaring abolished, suspended, or inadmissible in a
+Court of Law the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile
+party.
+
+What is the cause of this divergent interpretation of an article, the
+literal meaning of which seems to be quite clear? The divergence is due
+to the different mode of interpretation of statutes resorted to by
+continental Courts, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, by British
+and American Courts.
+
+Continental Courts take into consideration not only the literal meaning
+of a clause of a statute, but also the intention of the legislator as
+evidenced by--what I should like to call--the history of the clause.
+They look for the intention of the draftsman, they search the
+Parliamentary proceedings concerning the clause, and they interpret and
+construe the clause with regard to the intention of the draftsman as
+well as to the proceedings in Parliament.
+
+Now Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations was inserted on the motion of
+the German delegates to the Second Hague Peace Conference, and there is
+no doubt that the German delegates intended by its insertion to prevent
+the Municipal Law of belligerents from possessing a rule according to
+which the outbreak of war suspends or avoids contracts with alien
+enemies, and prohibits alien enemies from bringing an action in the
+Courts. It is for this reason that Germany and other continental States
+interpret Article 23(h) according to the intention of the German
+delegates.
+
+On the other hand, in interpreting and construing a clause of a statute,
+British and American Courts refuse to take into consideration the
+intention of the draftsman, Parliamentary discussions concerning the
+clause, and the like. They only take into consideration the literal
+meaning of the clause as it stands in the statute of which it is a part.
+Now Article 23(h) is a clause in the Convention concerning the Laws and
+Customs of War on Land. It is one of several paragraphs of Article 23
+which comprises the prohibition of a number of acts by the armed forces
+of belligerents in warfare on land, such as the employment of poison or
+poisoned arms, and the like. The British and American delegates,
+believing that it only concerned an act on the part of belligerent
+forces occupying enemy territory, therefore consented to the insertion
+of Article 23(h), and our Court of Appeal--in the case of Porter _v._
+Freundenberg (1915)--held that Article 23(h) is to be interpreted in
+that sense.[1]
+
+Be that as it may, the difficulty of interpretation and construction of
+international treaties will exist so long as no International Statute
+has been agreed upon which lays down detailed rules concerning
+interpretation and construction, or so long as International Courts have
+not developed such rules in practice. But the problem of International
+Courts is itself a very difficult one; it will be the subject of my
+third lecture which will deal with Administration of Justice and
+Mediation within the League of Nations.
+
+[1] By a letter of February 28, 1911, I drew the attention of the
+Foreign Office to the interpretation of Article 23(h) which generally
+prevailed on the Continent. This letter and the answer I received were
+privately printed, and copies were distributed amongst those members and
+associates of the Institute of International Law who attended the
+meeting at Madrid. Since French, German, and Italian International Law
+Journals published translations, but the original of the correspondence
+was never published in this country, I think it advisable to append it
+to this lecture.
+
+
+APPENDIX
+
+CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE FOREIGN OFFICE RESPECTING THE INTERPRETATION OF
+ARTICLE 23(h) OF THE HAGUE REGULATIONS CONCERNING LAND WARFARE
+
+
+LETTER FROM THE PRESENT WRITER TO THE FOREIGN OFFICE.
+
+                                          WHEWELL HOUSE, CAMBRIDGE,
+                                                  _28th February, 1911_.
+
+ TO
+ THE UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE
+     FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS.
+
+SIR,--
+
+I venture to bring the following matter before your consideration:--
+
+In the course of my recent studies I have been dealing with the laws and
+usages of war on land, and I have had to consider the interpretation of
+Article 23(h) of the Regulations attached to the Convention of 1907
+relating to the Laws and Customs of war on land. I find that the
+interpretation prevailing among all continental and some English and
+American authorities is contrary to the old English rule, and I would
+respectfully ask to be informed of the view which His Majesty's
+Government place upon the article in question.
+
+To give some idea as to how an interpretation of Article 23(h) contrary
+to the old English rule prevails generally, I will quote a number of
+French, German, English, and American writers, the works of whom I have
+at hand in my library, and I will also quote the German _Weissbuch_
+concerning the results of the second Hague Conference of 1907.
+
+Bonfils, _Manuel de droit international public_, 5th ed. by Fauchille,
+1908, discusses, on page 651, the doctrine which denies to an enemy
+subject any _persona standi in judicio_, but adds:--'... Article 23(h)
+decide qu'il est interdit de declarer eteints, suspendus ou non
+recevables en justice, les droits et actions des nationaux de la partie
+adverse.'
+
+Politis, Professor of International Law in the University of Poitiers
+(France), in his report to the Institute of International Law, Session
+of Paris (1910), concerning _Effets de la Guerre sur les Obligations
+Internationales et les Contrats prives_, page 18, says:
+
+'Un point hors de doute, c'est, que la guerre ne peut, ni par elle-meme
+ni par la volonte des belligerants, affecter la validite ou l'execution
+des contrats anterieurs. Cette regle fait desormais partie du droit
+positif. L'article 23(h) du nouveau Reglement de la Haye interdit
+formellement aux belligerants "de declarer eteints, suspendus ou non
+recevables en justice les droits et actions des nationaux de la partie
+adverse."
+
+'Cette formule condamne d'anciens usages conserves encore, en partie,
+dans certains pays. Elle proscrit d'abord tous les moyens--annulation ou
+confiscation--par lesquels on chercherait a atteindre, dans leur
+existence, les droits nes avant la guerre. Elle exclut, en second lieu,
+l'ancienne pratique qui interdisait aux particuliers ennemis l'acces des
+tribunaux. Elle prohibe, enfin, toutes les mesures legislatives ou
+autres tendant a entraver au cours de la guerre l'execution ou les
+effets utiles des obligations privees, notamment le cours des interets.
+
+'Il y a la progres incontestable. Et l'on doit etre reconnaissant a la
+delegation allemande a la 2e Conference de la paix de l'avoir provoque.
+
+'L'accueil empresse et unanime qu'a recu cette heureuse initiative
+permet d'esperer que de nouveaux progres pourront etre realises dans cet
+ordre d'idees.
+
+'On doit souhaiter que la disposition de l'article 23(h), etrangere a
+l'hypothese de l'occupation du territoire ennemi, soit distraite du
+reglement de 1907 (comme les articles 57 a 60 l'ont ete du Reglement de
+1899) pour etre mieux placee dans une convention nouvelle, ou d'autres
+textes viendraient la completer.'
+
+Ullmann, _Voelkerrecht_, 2nd ed. 1908, p. 474, says:--
+
+'Auch der Rechtsverkehr wird durch den Ausbruch des Krieges nicht
+unterbrochen oder gehemmt. Die nach Landesrecht frueher uebliche
+zeitweise Aufhebung der Klagbarkeit vom Schuldverbindlichkeiten des
+Staates oder eines Angehoerigen gegen Angehoerige des Feindes ist durch
+Artikel 23(h) untersagt.'
+
+Wehberg, _Das Beuterecht im Land- und Seekriege_, 1909, pp. 5 and 6
+says:--
+
+'Article 46 Absatz 2 bestimmt:--"Das Privateigentum darf nicht
+eingezogen werden." In konsequenter Durchfuehrung dieses Satzes bestimmt
+der auf deutschen Antrag 1907 hinzugefuegte Article 23(h):--"Untersagt
+ist die Aufhebung oder zeitweilige Ausserkraftsetzung der Rechte und
+Forderungen von Angehoerigen der Gegenpartei oder der Ausschliessung
+ihrer Klagbarkeit."'
+
+Whittuck, _International Documents_, London 1908, Introduction p. xxvii,
+says--'In Article 23(h) it is prohibited to declare abolished, suspended
+or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the
+nationals of the other belligerent which is a development of the
+principle that the private property of the subjects of a belligerent is
+not subject to confiscation. This new prohibition if accepted by this
+country would necessitate some changes in our municipal law.'
+
+Holland, _The Laws of War on Land_, 1908, says on p. 5 that:--'Article
+23(h) seems to require the Signatory Powers to the convention concerned
+to legislate for the abolition of an enemy's disability to sustain a
+_persona standi in judicio_.' (See also Holland, _loco citato_, p. 44,
+where he expresses his doubts concerning the interpretation of Article
+23(h).)
+
+Bordwell, _The Law of War between Belligerents_, Chicago 1908,
+recognises on page 210 the fact that according to Article 23(h) an alien
+enemy must now be allowed to sue in the courts of a belligerent, and
+
+Gregory, Professor in the University of Iowa, who reviews Bordwell's
+work in the _American Journal of International Law_, Volume 3 (1909),
+page 788, takes up the same standpoint.
+
+The only author who interprets Article 23(h) in a different way is
+General Davis, who in his _Elements of International Law_, 3rd edition
+1908, page 578, note 1, says:--
+
+'It is more than probable that this humane and commendable purpose would
+fail of accomplishment if a military commander conceived it to be within
+his authority to suspend or nullify their operation, or to regard their
+application in certain cases as a matter falling within his
+administrative discretion. Especially is this true where a military
+officer refuses to receive well grounded complaints, or declines to
+receive demands for redress, in respect to the acts or conduct of the
+troops under his command, from persons subject to the jurisdiction of
+the enemy who find themselves, for the time being, in the territory
+which he holds in military occupation. To provide against such a
+contingency it was deemed wise to add an appropriate declaratory clause
+to the prohibition of Article 23.'
+
+It is very unfortunate that the book of General Davis is not at all
+known on the Continent, and that therefore none of the continental
+authors have any knowledge of the fact that a divergent interpretation
+from their own of Article 23(h) is being preferred by an American
+author.
+
+It is likewise very unfortunate that neither the English Bluebook on the
+Second Hague Peace Conference (see Parliamentary Papers, Miscellaneous
+No. 4, 1907, page 104) nor the official minutes of the proceedings of
+the Conference, edited by the Dutch Government, give any such
+information concerning the construction of Article 23(h) as could assist
+a jurist in forming an opinion regarding the correct interpretation.
+
+It is, however, of importance to take notice of the fact that Article
+23(h) is an addition to Article 23 which was made on the proposition of
+Germany, and that Germany prefers an interpretation of Article 23(h)
+which would seem to coincide with the interpretation preferred by all
+the continental writers. This becomes clearly apparent from the German
+_Weissbuch ueber die Ergebnisse der im Jahre 1907 in Haag abgehaltenen
+Friedensconferenz_, which contains on page 7 the following:--
+
+'Der Artikel 23 hat gleichfalls auf deutschen Antrag zwei wichtige
+Zusaetze erhalten. Durch den ersten wird der Grundsatz der
+Unverletzlichkeit des Privateigenthumes auch auf dem Gebiete der
+Forderungsrechte anerkannt. Nach der Gesetzgebung einzelner Staaten soll
+naemlich der Krieg die Folge haben, dass die Schuldverbindlichkeiten des
+Staates oder seiner Angehoerigen gegen Angehoerige des Feindes aufgehoben
+oder zeitweilig ausser Kraft gesetzt oder wenigstens von der
+Klagbarkeit ausgeschlossen werden. Solche Vorschriften werden nun durch
+den Artikel 23 Abs. 1 unter h fuer unzulaessig erklaert.'
+
+However this may be, the details given above show sufficiently that a
+divergent interpretation of Article 23(h) from the old English rule is
+prevalent on the Continent, and is to some extent also accepted by
+English and American Authorities, and it is for this reason that I would
+ask whether His Majesty's Government consider that the old English rule
+is no longer in force.
+
+                                        I have, &c.,
+
+                                             (Signed) L. OPPENHEIM.
+
+
+LETTER FROM THE FOREIGN OFFICE TO THE PRESENT WRITER.
+
+                                                    FOREIGN OFFICE,
+                                                       _March 27, 1911_.
+
+SIR,--
+
+I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to thank you for your letter of
+February 28th, and for drawing his attention to the misconceptions which
+appear to prevail so largely among the continental writers on
+international law with regard to the purport and effect of Article 23(h)
+of the Convention of October 18th, 1907, respecting the laws and customs
+of war on land.
+
+It seems very strange that jurists of the standing of those from whose
+writings you quote could have attributed to the article in question the
+meaning and effect they have given it if they had studied the general
+scheme of the instrument in which it finds a place.
+
+The provision is inserted at the end of an article dealing with the
+prohibited modes of warfare. It forms part of Chapter I. of Section II.
+of the Regulations annexed to the Convention. The title of Chapter I. is
+'Means of injuring the enemy, sieges and bombardment': and if the
+article itself is examined it will be seen to deal with such matters as
+employing poison or poisoned weapons, refusing quarter, use of treachery
+and the unnecessary destruction of private property. Similarly the
+following articles (24 to 28) all deal with the restrictions which the
+nations felt it incumbent upon them from a sense of humanity to place
+upon the conduct of their armed forces in the actual prosecution of
+military operations.
+
+The Regulation in which these articles figure is itself merely an annex
+to the Convention which alone forms the contractual obligation between
+the parties, and the engagement which the parties to the Convention have
+undertaken is (Article 1) to 'issue instructions to their armed land
+forces in conformity with the Regulations respecting the Law and Customs
+of war on land.'
+
+This makes it abundantly clear that the purpose and scope of the
+Regulations is limited to the proceedings of the armies in the field;
+those armies are under the orders of the commanders, and the Governments
+are bound to issue instructions to those commanders to act in accordance
+with the Regulations. That is all. There is nothing in the Convention or
+in the Regulations dealing with the rights or the status of the
+non-combatant individuals, whether of enemy nationality or domiciled in
+enemy territory. They are, of course, if inhabitants of the theatre of
+war, affected by the provisions of the Regulations because they are
+individuals who are affected by the military operations, and in a sense
+a regulation which forbids a military commander from poisoning a well
+gives a non-combatant inhabitant a right or a quasi-right not to have
+his well poisoned, but his rights against his neighbours, his relations
+with private individuals, whether of his own or of enemy nationality,
+remain untouched by this series of rules for the conduct of warfare on
+land.
+
+Turning now to the actual wording of Article 23(h) it will be seen that
+it begins with the wording 'to declare.' It is particularly forbidden
+'to _declare_ abolished, &c.' This wording necessarily contemplates the
+issue of some proclamation or notification purporting to abrogate or to
+change rights previously existing and which would otherwise have
+continued to exist, and in view of Article I of the Convention this
+hypothetical proclamation must have been one which it was assumed the
+commander of the army would issue; consequently, stated broadly, the
+effect of Article 23(h) is that a commander in the field is forbidden to
+attempt to terrorise the inhabitants of the theatre of war by depriving
+them of existing opportunities of obtaining relief to which they are
+entitled in respect of private claims.
+
+Sir E. Grey is much obliged to you for calling his attention to the
+extract which you quote from the German White Book. This extract may be
+translated as follows:--'Article 23 has also received on German
+proposal two weighty additions. By the first the fundamental principle
+of the inviolability of private property in the domain of legal claims
+is recognised. According to the legislation of individual states, war
+has the result of extinguishing or temporarily suspending, or at least
+of suppressing the liability of the state or its nationals to be sued by
+nationals of the enemy. These prescriptions have now been declared
+inadmissible by Article 23(h).'
+
+The original form of the addition to Article 23 which the German
+delegates proposed was as follows: 'de declarer eteintes, suspendues ou
+non recevables les reclamations privees de ressortissants de la Partie
+adverse' (see proces-verbal of the 2nd meeting of the 1st sub-Committee
+of the 2nd Committee, 10th July, 1907).
+
+There is nothing to show that any explanation was vouchsafed to the
+effect that the proposed addition to the article was intended to mean
+more than its wording necessarily implied, though there is a statement
+by one of the German delegates in the proces-verbal of the 1st meeting
+of the 1st sub-Committee of the 2nd Committee, on July 3rd, which in all
+probability must have referred to this particular amendment, though the
+proces-verbal does not render it at all clear; nor is the statement
+itself free from ambiguity. An amendment was suggested and accepted at
+the second meeting to add the words 'en justice' after 'non recevables,'
+and in this form the sub-article was considered by an examining
+committee, was accepted and incorporated in Article 23, and brought
+before and accepted by the Conference in its 4th Plenary Sitting on the
+17th August, 1907.
+
+The subsequent alteration in the wording must have been made by the
+Drafting Committee, but cannot have been considered to affect the
+substance of the provision, as in the 10th Plenary Sitting on October
+17th, 1907, the reporter of the Drafting Committee, in dealing with the
+verbal amendments made in this Convention, merely said, 'En ce qui
+concerne le reglement lui-meme, je n'appellerai pas votre attention sur
+les differentes modifications de style sans importance que nous y avons
+introduites.'
+
+Nor is there anything to indicate any such far-reaching interpretation
+as the German White Book suggests in the report which accompanied the
+draft text of the Convention when it was brought before the Plenary
+Sitting of the Conference (Annex A. to 4th Plenary Sitting). It merely
+states that the addition is regarded as embodying in very happy terms a
+consequence of the principles accepted in 1899.
+
+The result appears to Sir E. Grey to be that neither the wording nor the
+context nor the circumstances attending the introduction of the
+provision which now figures as Article 23(h) support the interpretation
+which the writers you quote place upon it and which the German White
+Book endorses.
+
+Sir E. Grey notices that, in the extract you quote, Monsieur Politis,
+after placing his own interpretation upon the article, remarks that it
+is quite foreign to the hypothesis of the occupation of territory and
+ought to be removed from the Regulations and turned into a Convention by
+itself. If this interpretation were correct, this remark of Monsieur
+Politis is certainly true: but the fact that the provision appears where
+it does should have suggested to Monsieur Politis that it does not bear
+the interpretation he puts upon it.
+
+Nor does it appear to Sir E. Grey that the provision conflicts with the
+principle of the English common law that an enemy subject is not
+entitled to bring an action in the courts to sustain a contract,
+commerce with enemy subjects being illegal.
+
+That principle operates automatically on the outbreak of war, it
+requires no declaration by the Government, still less by a commander in
+the field, to bring it into operation. It is a principle which applies
+equally whether the war is being waged on land or sea, and which is
+applied in all the courts and not merely in those within the field of
+the operations of the military commanders.
+
+The whole question of the effect of war upon the commerce of private
+persons may require reconsideration in the future; the old rules may be
+scarcely consistent with the requirements or the conditions of modern
+commerce; but a modification of those rules is not one to which His
+Majesty's Government could be a party except after careful enquiry and
+consideration, and, when made at all, it must be done by a convention
+that applies to war both on land and sea.
+
+They certainly have not become parties to any such modification by
+agreeing to a convention which relates only to the instructions they are
+to give the commanders of their armed forces, and which is limited to
+war on land.
+
+                                        I am, &c.,
+
+                                             (Signed) F. A. CAMPBELL.
+
+
+
+
+THIRD LECTURE
+
+ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND MEDIATION WITHIN THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+
+    I. Administration of Justice within the League is a question of
+    International Courts, but it is incorrect to assert that
+    International Legislation necessitates the existence of
+    International Courts.
+
+    II. The Permanent Court of Arbitration created by the First Hague
+    Peace Conference.
+
+    III. The difficulties connected with International Administration of
+    Justice by International Courts.
+
+    IV. The necessity for a Court of Appeal above the International
+    Court of First Instance.
+
+    V. The difficulties connected with the setting up of International
+    Courts of Justice.
+
+    VI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself because it
+    distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several Benches
+    which would be called upon to decide the cases.
+
+    VII. The advantages of the recommended scheme.
+
+    VIII. A necessary provision for so-called complex cases of dispute.
+
+    IX. A necessary provision with regard to the notorious clause _rebus
+    sic stantibus_.
+
+    X. The two starting points for a satisfactory proposal concerning
+    International Mediation by International Councils of Conciliation.
+    Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning Pacific Settlement of
+    International disputes. The Permanent International Commissions of
+    the Bryan Peace Treaties.
+
+    XI. Details of a scheme which recommends itself for the
+    establishment of International Councils of Conciliation.
+
+    XII. The question of disarmament.
+
+    XIII. The assertion that States renounce their sovereignty by
+    entering into the League.
+
+    XIV. Conclusion: Can it be expected that, in case of a great
+    conflict of interests, all the members of the League will faithfully
+    carry out their engagements?
+
+
+THE LECTURE
+
+I. My last lecture dealt with the organisation of a League of Nations
+and International Legislation by the League. To-day I want to draw your
+attention to International Administration of Justice and International
+Mediation within the League.
+
+I begin with International Administration of Justice which, of course,
+is a question of International Courts of Justice. Hitherto, although
+International Legislation has been to some extent in existence, no
+International Courts have been established before which States in
+dispute have been compelled to appear. Now there is no doubt that
+International Legislation loses in value if there are no arrangements
+for International Administration of Justice by independent and permanent
+International Courts. Yet it is incorrect to assert, although it is
+frequently done, that one may not speak of legislation and a law created
+by legislation without the existence of Courts to administer such law.
+
+Why is this assertion incorrect? Because the function of Courts is to
+decide _controversial_ questions of law or of fact in case the
+respective parties cannot agree concerning them. However, in most cases
+the law is not in jeopardy, and its commands are carried out by those
+concerned without any necessity for a Court to declare the law. Modern
+International Law has been in existence for several hundred years, and
+its commands have in most cases been complied with in the absence of
+International Courts. On the other hand, there is no doubt that, if
+controversies arise about a question of law or a question of fact, the
+authority of the law can be successfully vindicated only by the verdict
+of a Court. And it is for this reason that no highly developed Community
+can exist for long without Courts of Justice.
+
+II. The Community of civilised States did not, until the end of the
+nineteenth century, possess any permanent institution which made the
+administration of international justice possible. When States were in
+conflict and, instead of having recourse to arms, resolved to have the
+dispute peaceably settled by an award, in every case they agreed upon
+so-called arbitration, and they nominated one or more arbitrators, whom
+they asked to give a verdict. For this reason, it was an epoch-making
+step forward when the First Peace Conference of 1899 agreed upon the
+institution of a Permanent Court of Arbitration, and a code of rules for
+the procedure before this Court. Although the term 'Permanent Court of
+Arbitration,' as applied to the institution established by the First
+Hague Peace Conference, is only a euphemism, since actually the Court
+concerned is not a permanent one and the members of the Court have in
+every case to be nominated by the parties, there is in existence,
+firstly, a permanent panel of persons from which the arbitrators may be
+selected; secondly, a permanent office at the Hague; and, thirdly, a
+code of procedure before the Court. Thereby an institution has been
+established which is always at hand in case the parties in conflict
+want to make use of it; whereas in former times parties in conflict had
+to negotiate a long time in order to set up the machinery for
+arbitration. And the short time of twenty years has fully justified the
+expectations aroused by the institution of the Permanent Court of
+Arbitration, for a good number of cases have been brought before it and
+settled to the satisfaction of the parties concerned.
+
+And the Second Hague Peace Conference of 1907 contemplated further steps
+by agreeing upon a treaty concerning the establishment of an
+International Court of Appeal in Prize Cases, and upon a draft treaty
+concerning a really Permanent International Court of Justice side by
+side with the existing Court of Arbitration. Although neither of these
+contemplated International Courts has been established, there is no
+doubt that, if after the present war a League of Nations becomes a
+reality, one or more International Courts of Justice will surely be
+established, although the existing Permanent Court of Arbitration may
+remain in being.
+
+III. But just as regards International Legislation, I must warn you not
+to imagine that International Administration of Justice by International
+Courts is an easy matter. It is in fact full of difficulties of many
+kinds.
+
+The peculiar character of International Law; the rivalry between the
+different schools of international jurists, namely the Naturalists,
+Positivists, and Grotians; the question of language; the peculiarities
+of the systems of law of the different States, of their constitutions,
+and many other difficulties, entail the danger that International Courts
+may become the arena of national jealousies, of empty talk, and of
+political intrigues, instead of being pillars of international justice.
+
+Everything depends upon what principles will guide the States in their
+selection of the individuals whom they appoint as members of
+International Courts. Not diplomatists, not politicians, but only men
+ought to be appointed who have had a training in law in general, and in
+International Law in particular; men who are linguists, knowing, at any
+rate, the French language besides their own; men who possess
+independence of character and are free from national prejudices of every
+kind. There is no doubt that, under present conditions and circumstances
+of international life, the institution of International Courts
+represents an unheard of experiment. There is, however, likewise no
+doubt that _now_ is the time for the experiment to be made, and I
+believe that the experiment will be successful, provided the several
+States are careful in the appointment of the judges.
+
+IV. And it must be emphasised that an International Court of Appeal
+above the one or several International Courts is a necessity. Just as
+Municipal Courts of Justice, so International Courts of Justice are not
+infallible. If the States are to be compelled to have their judicial
+disputes settled by International Administration of Justice, there must
+be a possibility of bringing an appeal from lower International Courts
+to a Higher Court. It is only in this way that in time a body of
+International Case Law can grow up, which will be equivalent in its
+influence upon the practice of the States to the municipal case law of
+the different States.
+
+V. I have hitherto considered in a general way only the difficulties of
+International Administration of Justice; I have not touched upon the
+particular difficulties connected with the setting up and manning of
+International Courts. If the several States could easily agree upon,
+say, five qualified men as judges of a Court of First Instance, and
+upon, say, seven qualified men as judges of a Court of Appeal, there
+would be no difficulty whatever in setting up these two Courts. And
+perhaps some generations hence the time may come when such an agreement
+will be possible. In our time it cannot be expected, and here therefore
+lies the great difficulty in the way of setting up and manning
+International Courts of Justice; because there is no doubt that each
+State will claim the right to appoint at least one man of its own choice
+to sit as judge in the International Court or Courts. And since there
+are about fifty or more civilised independent States in existence, the
+International Court would comprise fifty or more members.
+
+Now why would the several States claim a right to appoint at least one
+man of their own choice as judge? They would do this because they desire
+to have a representative of their own general legal views in the Court.
+It is a well-known fact that not only the legal systems which prevail in
+the several States differ, but also that there are differences
+concerning the fundamental conceptions of justice, law, procedure, and
+evidence. Each State fears that an International Court will create a
+practice fundamentally divergent from its general legal views, unless
+there is at least one representative of its own general legal views
+sitting in the Court.
+
+I think that in spite of everything the difficulty is not insurmountable
+provided a scheme for an International Court which follows closely the
+model of Municipal Courts is not insisted upon. Just as the organisation
+of a League of Nations cannot follow the model of the organisation of a
+State, so the attempt to set up an International Court must not aim at
+following closely the model of Municipal Courts. What is required is an
+institution which secures the settlement of judicial international
+disputes by giving judgments on the basis of law. I think this demand
+can be satisfied by a scheme which would meet both the claim of each
+State to nominate one judge and the necessity not to overcrowd the Bench
+which decides each dispute.
+
+VI. The scheme which I should like to recommend is one which
+distinguishes between the Court as a whole and the several Benches which
+would be called upon to decide the several cases. It is as follows:
+
+The Court as a whole to consist of as many judges as there are members
+of the League, each member to appoint one judge and one deputy judge who
+would take the place of the judge in case of illness or death or other
+cause of absence. The President, the Vice-President, and, say, twelve or
+fourteen members to constitute the Permanent Bench of the Court and
+therefore to be resident the whole year round at the Hague. Half of the
+members of this Permanent Bench of the Court to be appointed by the
+Great Powers--each Great Power to appoint one--and the other half of the
+members to be appointed by the minor Powers. Perhaps the Scandinavian
+Powers might agree upon the nomination of one member; Holland and Spain
+and Portugal upon another; Belgium, Switzerland, and Luxemburg upon a
+third; the Balkan States upon a fourth; Argentina, Brazil, and Chile
+upon a fifth; and so on. Anyhow, some arrangement would have to be made
+according to which the minor Powers unite upon the appointment of half
+the number of the Permanent Bench.
+
+If a judicial dispute arises between two States, the case to go in the
+first instance before a Bench comprising the two judges appointed by the
+two States in dispute and a President who, as each case arises, is to be
+selected by the Permanent Bench of the Court from the members of this
+Bench. This Court of First Instance having given its judgment, each
+party to have a right of appeal. The appeal to go before the Permanent
+Bench at the Hague, which is to give judgment with a quorum of six
+judges with the addition of those judges who served as the Bench of
+First Instance. The right of appeal to exist only on questions of law
+and not on questions of fact.
+
+Decisions of the Appeal Court to be binding precedents for itself and
+for any Courts of First Instance. But should the Appeal Court desire to
+go back on a former decision of law, this to be possible only at a
+meeting of the Court comprising at least twelve members of the Permanent
+Bench.
+
+VII. The proposal which I have just sketched, and which will need to be
+worked out in detail if it is to be realised, offers the following
+advantages:
+
+Every case would in the first instance be decided by a small Bench which
+would enjoy the confidence of both parties because they would have their
+own judge in the Court. This point is of particular importance with
+regard to the mode of taking evidence and making clear the facts; but is
+likewise of importance on account of the divergence of fundamental legal
+views and the like.
+
+Since the Court of Appeal would only decide points of law, the facts as
+elucidated by the Bench of First Instance would remain settled. But the
+existence of the Court of Appeal would enable the parties to re-argue
+questions of law with all details. The fact that six of the Bench which
+serves as a Court of Appeal are members of the Permanent Bench would
+guarantee a thorough reconsideration of the points of law concerned, and
+likewise the maintenance and sequence of tradition in International
+Administration of Justice.
+
+Again, the fact that the Court of Appeal is to comprise, besides six
+members of the Permanent Bench, those three judges who sat as the Bench
+of First Instance would guarantee that the judges appointed by the
+States in dispute could again bring into play any particular views of
+law they may hold.
+
+VIII. This is the outline of my scheme for the establishment and manning
+of the International Court of Justice. But before I leave the subject, I
+must say a few words concerning two important points which almost all
+other schemes for the establishment of an International Court overlook.
+Firstly, the necessity to make provision for what I should like to call
+complex cases of dispute; namely, cases which are justiciable but in
+which, besides the question of law, there is at the same time involved a
+vital political principle or claim. Take the case of a South American
+State entering into an agreement with a non-American State to lease to
+it a coaling station: this case is justiciable, but besides the question
+of law there is a political claim involved in it, namely, the Monroe
+doctrine of the United States. Unless provision be made for the
+settlement of such complex cases, the League of Nations will not be a
+success, for it might well happen that a case touches vital political
+interests in such a way as not to permit a State to have it settled by a
+mere juristic decision.
+
+Now my proposal to meet such complex cases is that when a party objects
+to a settlement of a case on mere juristic principles, although the
+other party maintains that it is a justiciable case, the Bench which is
+to serve as Bench of First Instance shall investigate the matter with
+regard to the question whether the case is more political than legal in
+nature. If the Court decides the question in the negative, then the same
+Court shall give judgment on the dispute; but, if the Court decides the
+question in the affirmative, then the case shall be referred by the
+Court to the International Council of Conciliation. Whatever the
+decision of the Bench of First Instance may be, each party shall have
+the right of appeal to the Permanent Bench which serves as the Court of
+Appeal.
+
+IX. The other point which I desire to mention before I leave the subject
+of International Administration of Justice concerns the notorious
+principle _conventio omnis intelligitur rebus sic stantibus_. You know
+that almost all publicists and also almost all Governments assert the
+existence of a customary rule according to which a vital change of
+circumstances after ratification of a treaty may be of such a kind as to
+justify a party in demanding to be released either from the whole treaty
+or from certain obligations stipulated in it. But the meaning of the
+term 'vital change of circumstances' is elastic, and there is therefore
+great danger that the principle _conventio omnis intelligitur rebus sic
+stantibus_ will be abused for the purpose of hiding the violation of
+treaties behind the shield of law. This danger will remain so long as
+there is no International Court in existence which, on the motion of one
+of the contracting parties, could set aside the treaty obligation whose
+fulfilment has become so oppressive that in justice the obliged party
+might ask to be released. Now, as the League of Nations is to set up an
+International Court of Justice, my proposal is that the Court should be
+declared competent to give judgment on the claim of a party to a treaty
+to be released from its obligations on account of vital change of
+circumstances. Of course the case would go before that Bench of the
+Court which is to serve as the Court of First Instance, and an appeal
+would lie to the Permanent Bench which serves as the Court of Appeal.
+
+X. Having given you the outlines of a scheme concerning International
+Administration of Justice, I now turn to International Mediation by
+International Councils of Conciliation.
+
+For a satisfactory proposal concerning International Councils of
+Conciliation two starting points offer themselves. One starting point is
+the special form of mediation recommended by Article 8 of the Hague
+Convention concerning the pacific settlement of international disputes.
+The following is the text of this Article 8:
+
+    'The Signatory Powers are agreed in recommending the application,
+    when circumstances allow, of special mediation in the following
+    form:--
+
+    'In case of a serious difference endangering peace, the contending
+    States choose respectively a Power, to which they intrust the
+    mission of entering into direct communication with the Power chosen
+    on the other side, with the object of preventing the rupture of
+    pacific relations.
+
+    'For the period of this mandate, the term of which, in default of
+    agreement to the contrary, cannot exceed thirty days, the States at
+    variance cease from all direct communication on the subject of the
+    dispute, which is regarded as referred exclusively to the mediating
+    Powers. These Powers shall use their best efforts to settle the
+    dispute.
+
+    'In case of a definite rupture of pacific relations, these Powers
+    remain jointly charged with the task of taking advantage of any
+    opportunity to restore peace.'
+
+The second starting point is supplied by the Permanent International
+Commissions of the so-called Bryan Peace Treaties concluded in 1913-14
+by the United States of America with a number of other States. These
+peace treaties are not in every point identical, but of interest to us
+here are the clauses according to which Permanent International
+Commissions are set up to serve as Councils of Conciliation. The
+following is the text of the three articles concerned of the treaty
+between the United States and Great Britain of September 15, 1914:
+
+    Art. I. 'The High Contracting Parties agree that all disputes
+    between them, of every nature whatsoever, other than disputes the
+    settlement of which is provided for and in fact achieved under
+    existing agreements between the High Contracting Parties, shall,
+    when diplomatic methods of adjustment have failed, be referred for
+    investigation and report to a permanent International Commission, to
+    be constituted in the manner prescribed in the next succeeding
+    article; and they agree not to declare war or begin hostilities
+    during such investigation and before the report is submitted.'
+
+    Art. II. 'The International Commission shall be composed of five
+    members, to be appointed as follows: One member shall be chosen from
+    each country, by the Government thereof; one member shall be chosen
+    by each Government from some third country; the fifth member shall
+    be chosen by common agreement between the two Governments, it being
+    understood that he shall not be a citizen of either country. The
+    expenses of the Commission shall be paid by the two Governments in
+    equal proportions.'
+
+    'The International Commission shall be appointed within six months
+    after the exchange of the ratifications of this treaty; and
+    vacancies shall be filled according to the manner of the original
+    appointment.'
+
+    Art. III. 'In case the High Contracting Parties shall have failed to
+    adjust a dispute by diplomatic methods, they shall at once refer it
+    to the International Commission for investigation and report. The
+    International Commission may, however, spontaneously by unanimous
+    agreement offer its services to that effect, and in such case it
+    shall notify both Governments and request their co-operation in the
+    investigation.'
+
+Keeping in view the special form of mediation recommended by Article 8
+of the Hague Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of
+International Disputes and the stipulations of the Bryan Peace Treaties
+concerning Permanent International Commissions, we can reach a
+satisfactory solution of the problem of International Mediation if we
+take into consideration the two reasons why a League of Nations must
+stipulate the compulsion of its members to bring non-justiciable
+disputes before a Council of Conciliation previous to resorting to
+hostilities. These reasons are, firstly, that war in future shall not be
+declared without a previous attempt to have the dispute peaceably
+settled, and, secondly, that war in future shall not break out like a
+bolt from the blue.
+
+XI. My proposal concerning International Councils of Conciliation is the
+following:
+
+Every member of the League shall appoint for a term of years--say five
+or ten--two conciliators and two deputy conciliators from among their
+own subjects, and one conciliator and one deputy conciliator from among
+the subjects of some other State. Now when a non-justiciable dispute
+arises between two States which has not been settled by diplomatic
+means, the three conciliators of each party in dispute shall meet to
+investigate the matter, to report thereon, and to propose, if possible,
+a settlement.
+
+According to this proposal there would be in existence a number of
+Councils of Conciliation equal to half the number of the members of the
+League. Whenever a dispute arises, the Permanent Council of
+Conciliation--with which I shall deal presently--shall appoint a
+Chairman from amongst its own members. The Council thus constituted
+shall investigate the case, report on it, send a copy to each party in
+dispute and to the Permanent Council of Conciliation.
+
+The _Permanent_ Council of Conciliation should be a _small_ Council to
+be established by each of the Great Powers appointing one conciliator
+and one deputy conciliator for a period of--say--five or ten years. The
+reason why only the Great Powers should be represented in the Permanent
+Council of Conciliation at the Hague is that naturally, in case coercion
+is to be resorted to against a State which begins war without having
+previously submitted the dispute to a Council of Conciliation, the Great
+Powers will be chiefly concerned. This Permanent Council of Conciliation
+would have to watch the political life of the members of the League and
+communicate with all the Governments of the members in case the peace of
+the world were endangered by the attitude of one of the members; for
+instance by one or more of the members arming excessively. The Council
+would likewise be competent to draw the attention of States involved in
+a dispute to the fact that they ought to bring it before either the
+International Court of Justice or their special Council of Conciliation.
+
+This proposal of mine concerning mediation within the League of Nations
+is, of course, sketchy and would need working out in detail if one were
+thinking of preparing a full plan for its realisation. However that may
+be, my proposal concerning a number of Councils of Conciliation has the
+advantage that non-justiciable disputes would in each case be
+investigated and reported on by conciliators who have once for all been
+appointed by the States in dispute and who therefore possess their
+confidence. On the other hand, the proposed Permanent Council of
+Conciliation would guarantee to the Great Powers that important
+influence which is due to them on account of the fact that they would be
+chiefly concerned in case economic, military, or naval measures had to
+be resorted to against a recalcitrant member of the League.
+
+XII. Having discussed International Mediation by International Councils
+of Conciliation, I must now turn to two questions which I have hitherto
+purposely omitted, although in the eyes of many people they stand in the
+forefront of interest, namely, firstly, _disarmament_ as a consequence
+of the peaceable settlement of disputes by an International Court of
+Justice and International Councils of Conciliation, and, secondly, the
+question of the _surrender of sovereignty_ which it is asserted is
+involved by the entrance of any State into the proposed League of
+Nations.
+
+Now as regards disarmament, I have deliberately abstained from
+mentioning it hitherto, although it is certainly a question of the
+greatest importance. The reason for my abstention is a very simple one.
+I have always maintained that disarmament can neither diminish the
+number of wars nor abolish war altogether, but that, if the number of
+wars diminishes or if war be abolished altogether, disarmament will
+follow. There is no doubt that when once the new League of Nations is in
+being, war will occur much more rarely than hitherto. For this reason
+disarmament will _ipso facto_ follow the establishment of a League of
+Nations, and the details of such disarmament are matters which will soon
+be solved when once the new League has become a reality. Yet I must
+emphasise the fact that disarmament is not identical with the total
+abolition of armies and navies. The possibility must always be kept in
+view that one or more members of the League will be recalcitrant, and
+that then the other members must unite their forces against them. And
+there must likewise be kept in view the possibility of a war between two
+members of the League on account of a political dispute in which
+mediation by the International Councils of Conciliation was
+unsuccessful. Be that as it may, it is certain that in time disarmament
+can take place to a very great extent, and it is quite probable that
+large standing armies based on conscription might everywhere be
+abolished and be replaced by militia.
+
+XIII. Let me now turn to the question of sovereignty. Is the assertion
+really true that States renounce their sovereignty by entering into the
+League? The answer depends entirely upon the conception of sovereignty
+with which one starts. If sovereignty were absolutely unfettered liberty
+of action, a loss of sovereignty would certainly be involved by
+membership of the League, because every member submits to the
+obligation never to resort to arms on account of a judicial dispute, and
+in case of a political dispute to resort to arms only after having given
+an opportunity of mediation to an International Council of Conciliation.
+But in fact sovereignty does not mean absolutely boundless liberty of
+action; and moreover sovereignty has at no time been a conception upon
+the contents of which there has been general agreement.
+
+The term 'sovereignty' was introduced into political science by Bodin in
+his celebrated work 'De la Republique,' which appeared in 1577. Before
+that time, the word _souverain_ was used in France for any political or
+other authority which was not subordinate to any higher authority; for
+instance, the highest Courts were called _cours souveraines_. Now Bodin
+gave quite a new meaning to the old term. Being under the influence and
+in favour of the policy of centralisation initiated by Louis XI of
+France (1461-1483), the founder of French absolutism, Bodin defines
+sovereignty as the 'absolute and perpetual power within a State.'
+However, even Bodin was far from considering sovereignty to give
+absolutely unfettered freedom of action, for he conceded that
+sovereignty was restricted by the commandments of God and by the rules
+of the Law of Nature. Be that as it may, this conception of sovereignty
+once introduced was universally accepted; but at the same time the
+meaning of the term became immediately a bone of contention between the
+schools of publicists. And it is to be taken into consideration that the
+science of politics has learnt to distinguish between sovereignty of
+the State and sovereignty of the agents who exercise the sovereign
+powers of the State. According to the modern view sovereignty is a
+natural attribute of every independent State as a State; and neither the
+monarch, nor Parliament, nor the people can possess any sovereignty of
+their own. The sovereignty of a monarch, or of a Parliament, or of the
+whole people is not an original attribute of their own, but derives from
+the sovereignty of the State which is governed by them. It is outside
+the scope of this lecture to give you a history of the conception of
+sovereignty, it suffices to state the undeniable fact that from the time
+when the term was first introduced into political science until the
+present day there has never been unanimity with regard to its meaning,
+except that it is a synonym for independence of all earthly authority.
+
+Now, do you believe that the independence of a State is really infringed
+because it agrees never to make war on account of a judicial dispute,
+and in case of a political dispute not to resort to arms before having
+given opportunity of mediation to International Councils of
+Conciliation? Independence is not boundless liberty of a State to do
+what it likes, without any restriction whatever. The mere fact that
+there is an International Law in existence restricts the unbounded
+liberty of action of every civilised State, because every State is
+prohibited from interfering with the affairs of every other State. The
+fact is that the independence of every State finds its limitation in the
+independence of every other State. And it is generally admitted that a
+State can through conventions--such as a treaty of alliance or of
+neutrality or others--enter into many obligations which more or less
+restrict its liberty of action. Independence is a question of degree,
+and, therefore, it is also a question of degree whether or no the
+independence of a State is vitally encroached upon by a certain
+restriction. In my opinion the independence of a State is as little
+infringed by an agreement to submit all its judicial disputes to the
+judgment of a Court and not to resort to arms for a settlement, as the
+liberty of a citizen is infringed because in a modern State he can no
+longer resort to arms on account of a dispute with a fellow citizen but
+must submit it to the judgment of the Court.
+
+And even if it were otherwise, if the entrance of a State into the new
+League of Nations did involve an infringement of its sovereignty and
+independence, humanity need not grieve over it. The Prussian conception
+of the State as an end in itself and of the authority of the State as
+something above everything else and divine--a conception which found
+support in the philosophy of Hegel and his followers--is adverse to the
+ideal of democracy and constitutional government. Just as Henri IV of
+France said 'La France vaut bien une messe,' we may well say 'La paix du
+monde vaut bien la perte de l'independance de l'etat.'
+
+XIV. I have come to the end of this course of lectures, but before we
+part I should like, in conclusion, to touch upon a question which has
+frequently been put with regard to the proposal of a new League of
+Nations:--Can it really be expected that, in case of a great conflict of
+interests, all the members of the League will faithfully carry out their
+engagements? Will the new League stand the strain of such conflicts as
+shake the very existence of States and Nations? Will the League really
+stand the test of History?
+
+History teaches that many a State has entered into engagements with the
+intention of faithfully carrying them out, but, when a grave conflict
+arose, matters assumed a different aspect, with the consequence that the
+engagements remained unfulfilled. Will it be different in the future?
+Can the Powers which enter into the League of Nations trust to the
+security which it promises? Can they be prepared to disarm, although
+there is no guarantee that, when grave conflicts of vital interests
+arise, all the members of the League will faithfully stand by their
+engagements?
+
+These are questions which it is difficult to answer because no one can
+look into the future. We can only say that, if really constitutional and
+democratic government all the world over makes international politics
+honest and reliable and excludes secret treaties, all the chances are
+that the members of the League will see that their true interests and
+their lasting welfare are intimately connected with the necessity of
+fulfilling the obligations to which they have submitted by their
+entrance into the League. The upheaval created by the present World War,
+the many millions of lives sacrificed, and the enormous economic losses
+suffered during these years of war, not only by the belligerents but
+also by all neutrals, will be remembered for many generations to come.
+It would therefore seem to be certain that, while the memory of these
+losses in lives and wealth lasts, all the members of the League will
+faithfully carry out the obligations connected with the membership of
+the League into which they enter for the purpose of avoiding such a
+disaster as, like a bolt from the blue, fell upon mankind by the
+outbreak of the present war. On the other hand, I will not deny that no
+one can guarantee the future; that conflicts may arise which will shake
+the foundations of the League of Nations; that the League may fall to
+pieces; and that a disaster like the present may again visit mankind.
+Our generation can only do its best for the future, and it must be left
+to succeeding generations to perpetuate the work initiated by us.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX
+
+
+ Administration of Justice by International Courts, difficulties of, 62;
+   maintenance of tradition of, 67;
+   permanent institution for the, 61.
+
+ Aims of the League of Nations defined, 23, 28, 35-36.
+
+ Article 8 of the Hague Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of
+           International Disputes, 70.
+
+ Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, 45-55;
+   controversy respecting interpretation of, 45;
+   correspondence respecting, with Foreign Office, 48-55.
+
+ Autocratic Government, 11.
+
+
+ Belgium, 37, 66.
+
+ Bodin, 76.
+
+ Bonfils on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 49.
+
+ Bordwell on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ British Empire, 13, 20.
+
+ Bryan Peace Treaties, 71.
+
+ Bryce, Lord, scheme of, 36.
+
+
+ Central Powers, the, are they to become members of the League of
+           Nations? 17, 36;
+   necessity for utter defeat of, 15, 37.
+
+ Colonies, wars for the acquisition of, 10.
+
+ Complex cases of dispute, how to settle, 68.
+
+ Congress of Vienna, 30, 42.
+
+ Constitutional Government, 10, 11;
+   necessity for, 19.
+
+ Court of Appeal, International, 66, 67, 69;
+   manning of, 64.
+
+ Court of Arbitration, establishment of International, 61.
+
+ Court of First Instance, International, 64;
+   manning of, 66.
+
+ Crucee, Emeric, 9.
+
+
+ Davis, General, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning
+           Land Warfare, 51.
+
+ Democracy, 10, 11.
+
+ Dickinson, scheme of Sir Willoughby, 36.
+
+ Disarmament, 21, 74.
+
+ Dubois, Pierre, 8.
+
+ Dynastic wars, 10.
+
+
+ Engagements of the members of the League of Nations, security for
+           fulfilment of, 79.
+
+ Equality, of States, 33, 39;
+   of the votes at Hague Peace Conferences, 38.
+
+
+ Family, the, a product of natural development, 10.
+
+ Family of Nations, political hegemony of the Great Powers within the, 31.
+
+ Federal World State, A, 18-20;
+   demanded by Pacifists, 31;
+   why not possible, 19.
+
+ Foreign Office, letter of, to Professor Oppenheim concerning Article
+           23(h), 52-55.
+
+
+ German Confederation, civil war within the, 32.
+
+ German Weissbuch on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning
+           Land Warfare, 51, 54, 55.
+
+ Germany, is she to become a member of the League of Nations? 17, 36;
+   necessity for the utter defeat of, 15, 37.
+
+ Great Powers, 30, 66;
+   power and influence of the, 29-31.
+
+ Greece, city States of ancient, 7.
+
+ Gregory on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ Grey, Earl, 5, 52, 53, 55.
+
+ Grotians, the School of, 62.
+
+ Grotius, Hugo, 9.
+
+
+ Hague Convention concerning the Pacific Settlement of International
+           Disputes, Article 8 of, 70.
+
+ Hague Peace Conferences, 34;
+   method of legislating by, 45;
+   the work of, obstructed by some States, 38;
+   standing council of, proposed, 39;
+   starting point of organisation of League of Nations by, 36, 39;
+   votes of States of equal value at, 38.
+
+ Hague Regulations concerning Land Warfare, controversy respecting
+           interpretation of Article 23(h) of, 45.
+
+ Henry IV of France, 9, 78.
+
+ Holland, Professor, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning
+           Land Warfare, 50.
+
+
+ Independence of States, what it is, 33, 77.
+
+ International Army and Navy, why impossible, 6, 18, 20-22, 41.
+
+ International Case Law, 64.
+
+ International Council of Conciliation, 28, 40, 69;
+   scheme for the establishment of, 72-74;
+   starting points for, 70.
+
+ International Court of Appeal, 66, 67;
+   a necessity, 63;
+   manning of, 64.
+
+ International Court of First Instance, 64;
+   manning of proposed bench to serve as, 64.
+
+ International Court of Justice, 18, 28, 65-68;
+   manning of, 65;
+   proposed permanent bench of, 65, 66;
+   proposed special benches of, for different cases, 66.
+
+ International Courts, claims of all States in manning of, 64;
+   difficulties of manning of, 65;
+   precedents of, 64.
+
+ International Executive, why impossible, 19, 41.
+
+ International Government, why impossible, 19.
+
+ International Law, a book law at present, 43;
+   and League of Nations interdependent, 6, 33;
+   complied with often without Courts, 60;
+   grew by custom during Middle Ages, 8;
+   not in being in antiquity, 6;
+   progress of, 33, 35, 38;
+   universal and general, difference between, 44.
+
+ International Legislation, 38, 41-48;
+   a by-product only in the past, 42;
+   difficulties of, created by conflicting interests of States, 44;
+   difficulties of, created by different methods of interpretation and
+             construction, 45;
+   difficulties of, created by the fact that a majority vote cannot
+             create a statute, 44;
+   difficulties of, created by the language question, 43;
+   meaning of the term, 41;
+   possible even without International Courts, 42, 60;
+   possible only by agreement of all the States, 42;
+   wide field open for, 43.
+
+ International Statutes, cannot be created by majority vote, 44;
+   interpretation and construction of, 45;
+   what are? 42.
+
+ Internationalism, growth of, 12.
+
+
+ Law-making treaties, what are? 42.
+
+ 'La France vaut bien une messe,' 78.
+
+ League of Nations, 3, 8;
+   aims defined, 23, 28, 35-36;
+   and International Law interdependent, 6;
+   career in a sense started already, 8, 16;
+   conception of, very old, 6;
+   demand for, universal, 11;
+   impossibility of state-like organisation of, 36;
+   no unanimity concerning its aims or organisation, 18;
+   organisation of, demanded, 31;
+   problems connected with, 24, 28;
+   seven principles of, which ought to be adopted, 39-41;
+   so-called, but League of States is meant, 13;
+   starting point of organisation of, 33, 36, 39;
+   constitution _sui generis_ of, a necessity, 22, 33;
+   what is new in the now desired, 11;
+   when it would be an organised community, 11, 34.
+
+
+ Marini, Antoine, 8.
+
+ Mediation, International. _See_ International Council of Conciliation.
+
+ Militarism, conception of, 15;
+   Prussian, 16.
+
+
+ Nation, the, a product of historical development, 10, 14;
+   conception of, 13, 14;
+   not to be confounded with race, 13-14.
+
+ Nations, not to be confounded with States, 13, 14.
+
+ Nationality, principle of, 14, 32.
+
+ 'Natura non facit saltus,' 5.
+
+ Naturalists, the School of, 62.
+
+
+ Oppenheim, letter of Foreign Office concerning Article 23(h) of the
+           Hague Regulations to Professor, 52-55.
+
+
+ Pacifists, 31.
+
+ Parliament, International, why impossible, 18, 19.
+
+ Permanent Court of Arbitration, International, 34;
+   establishment of, by the First Peace Conference, 61.
+
+ Permanent International Commissions of the Bryan Peace Treaties, 71.
+
+ Podiebrad, 8.
+
+ Police, International, 6, 41.
+
+ Politis on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 49, 55.
+
+ Porter _v._ Freundenberg, case of, 47.
+
+ Positivists, the School of, 62.
+
+ Precedents of International Courts, 66.
+
+ Principle of Nationality, 14, 32.
+
+ Prize Court, International, proposed by Second Peace Conference, 34.
+
+
+ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 21.
+
+
+ Race, a product of natural development, 10;
+   not to be confounded with Nation, 13, 14.
+
+ Rebus sic stantibus, proposal for dealing with the clause, 69.
+
+ Religion, wars of, 10.
+
+
+ Sovereignty, conception of, 75;
+   not surrendered by entrance into the League of Nations, 74, 75, 78.
+
+ State, ideal of the national, 14.
+
+ States of the World, the 25 Allied belligerent and the 17 neutral, 16-17.
+
+ Statutes, difference between International and Municipal, 42.
+
+ Sully, 9.
+
+ Swiss Confederation, civil war within the, 32.
+
+ Switzerland, 13.
+
+
+ Taft, Ex-President, 5.
+
+ Transoceanic States, entrance into League of Nations of, 38.
+
+ Tribe, the, a product of natural development, 10.
+
+
+ Ubi societas ibi jus, 8.
+
+ Ullmann, on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ United States, civil war in the, 32.
+
+
+ Vienna Congress, the, 30, 42.
+
+ Votes, equality of, at Hague Peace Conferences, 38.
+
+
+ Wars for national unity, 10.
+
+ Wehberg on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ Whewell, Dr., 4.
+
+ Whittuck on Article 23(h) of the Hague Regulations concerning Land
+           Warfare, 50.
+
+ Wilson, President, 5.
+
+ World Federation, a demand of Pacifists, 31.
+
+
+
+
+             AT THE BALLANTYNE PRESS
+ PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE, BALLANTYNE AND CO. LTD.
+       COLCHESTER, LONDON AND ETON, ENGLAND
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber's Note:
+
+    Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note. Variant
+    spellings have been retained. Hyphenation has been standardised.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The League of Nations and its Problems, by
+Lassa Oppenheim
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LEAGUE OF NATIONS, ITS PROBLEMS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 26023.txt or 26023.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+        https://www.gutenberg.org/2/6/0/2/26023/
+
+Produced by Stephen Blundell and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
+produced from images generously made available by The
+Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
+paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.  See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
+     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
+     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+     License.  You must require such a user to return or
+     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+     Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+     of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+     Chief Executive and Director
+     gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations.  To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+     https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/26023.zip b/26023.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5b74842
--- /dev/null
+++ b/26023.zip
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..627c60b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #26023 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26023)