diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-8.txt | 3820 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-8.zip | bin | 0 -> 87169 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 4571639 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/16655-h.htm | 4167 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p01.jpg | bin | 0 -> 110747 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p01_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 15047 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p02.jpg | bin | 0 -> 109744 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p02_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 17374 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p03.jpg | bin | 0 -> 116099 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p03_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 19558 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p04.jpg | bin | 0 -> 110969 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p04_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 26870 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p05.jpg | bin | 0 -> 113071 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p05_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 27222 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p06.jpg | bin | 0 -> 107943 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p06_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 26413 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p07.jpg | bin | 0 -> 93005 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p07_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 27224 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p08.jpg | bin | 0 -> 113207 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p08_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 29272 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p09.jpg | bin | 0 -> 103187 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p09_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 24996 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p10.jpg | bin | 0 -> 114655 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p10_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 26674 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p11.jpg | bin | 0 -> 117421 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p11_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 33310 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p12.jpg | bin | 0 -> 117148 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p12_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 32538 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p13.jpg | bin | 0 -> 203168 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p13_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 47437 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p14.jpg | bin | 0 -> 178671 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p14_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 40816 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p15.jpg | bin | 0 -> 184695 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p15_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 45092 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p16.jpg | bin | 0 -> 127554 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p16_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 45359 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p17.jpg | bin | 0 -> 180492 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p17_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 43559 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p18.jpg | bin | 0 -> 136177 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p18_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 29886 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p19.jpg | bin | 0 -> 124247 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p19t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 32385 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p20.jpg | bin | 0 -> 60645 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p20_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 20019 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p21.jpg | bin | 0 -> 105738 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p21_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 39899 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p22.jpg | bin | 0 -> 84070 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p22_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 31158 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p23.jpg | bin | 0 -> 78818 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p23_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 27356 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p24.jpg | bin | 0 -> 70365 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p24_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 22038 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p25.jpg | bin | 0 -> 97991 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p25_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 33669 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p26.jpg | bin | 0 -> 61687 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p26_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 18666 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p27.jpg | bin | 0 -> 93024 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p27_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 35797 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p28.jpg | bin | 0 -> 65118 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p28_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 29344 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p29.jpg | bin | 0 -> 61263 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p29_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 22244 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p30.jpg | bin | 0 -> 72503 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p30_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 13957 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p31.jpg | bin | 0 -> 109926 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p31_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 34653 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p32.jpg | bin | 0 -> 122834 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655-h/images/p32_t.jpg | bin | 0 -> 41729 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655.txt | 3820 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 16655.zip | bin | 0 -> 87114 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 |
73 files changed, 11823 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/16655-8.txt b/16655-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..66b9f17 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3820 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artist and Public, by Kenyon Cox + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Artist and Public + And Other Essays On Art Subjects + +Author: Kenyon Cox + +Release Date: September 5, 2005 [EBook #16655] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTIST AND PUBLIC *** + + + + +Produced by Ted Garvin, Melissa Er-Raqabi and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + + + + + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + +AND OTHER +ESSAYS ON ART SUBJECTS + + +BY +KENYON COX + + + +[Illustration: From a photograph by Braun, Clement & Co. +Plate 1.--Millet. "The Goose Girl." +In the collection of Mme. Saulnier, Bordeaux.] + + + + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + +AND OTHER +ESSAYS ON ART SUBJECTS + + +BY +KENYON COX + + +_WITH THIRTY-TWO ILLUSTRATIONS_ + + + +CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS +NEW YORK MCMXIV + + + + +_Copyright, 1914, by Charles Scribner's Sons +Published September, 1914_ + + + + +TO + +J.D.C. + +IN GRATEFUL RECOGNITION OF UNFAILING KINDNESS +THIS BOOK IS INSCRIBED + + + + +PREFACE + + +In "The Classic Point of View," published three years ago, I endeavored +to give a clear and definitive statement of the principles on which all +my criticism of art is based. The papers here gathered together, whether +earlier or later than that volume, may be considered as the more +detailed application of those principles to particular artists, to whole +schools and epochs, even, in one case, to the entire history of the +arts. The essay on Raphael, for instance, is little else than an +illustration of the chapter on "Design"; that on Millet illustrates the +three chapters on "The Subject in Art," on "Design," and on "Drawing"; +while "Two Ways of Painting" contrasts, in specific instances, the +classic with the modern point of view. + +But there is another thread connecting these essays, for all of them +will be found to have some bearing, more or less direct, upon the +subject of the title essay. "The Illusion of Progress" elaborates a +point more slightly touched upon in "Artist and Public"; the careers of +Raphael and Millet are capital instances of the happy productiveness of +an artist in sympathy with his public or of the difficulties, nobly +conquered in this case, of an artist without public appreciation; the +greatest merit attributed to "The American School" is an abstention +from the extravagances of those who would make incomprehensibility a +test of greatness. Finally, the work of Saint-Gaudens is a noble example +of art fulfilling its social function in expressing and in elevating the +ideals of its time and country. + +This last essay stands, in some respects, upon a different footing from +the others. It deals with the work and the character of a man I knew and +loved, it was originally written almost immediately after his death, and +it is therefore colored, to some extent, by personal emotion. I have +revised it, rearranged it, and added to it, and I trust that this +coloring may be found to warm, without falsifying, the picture. + +The essay on "The Illusion of Progress" was first printed in "The +Century," that on Saint-Gaudens in "The Atlantic Monthly." The others +originally appeared in "Scribner's Magazine." + +KENYON COX. + +Calder House, +Croton-on-Hudson, +June 6, 1914. + + + + +CONTENTS + + +ESSAY PAGE + + I. ARTIST AND PUBLIC 1 + II. JEAN FRANÇOIS MILLET 44 +III. THE ILLUSION OF PROGRESS 77 + IV. RAPHAEL 99 + V. TWO WAYS OF PAINTING 134 + VI. THE AMERICAN SCHOOL 149 +VII. AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS 169 + + + + +ILLUSTRATIONS + + +MILLET: + 1. "The Goose Girl," _Saulnier Collection, Bordeaux_ _Frontispiece_ + FACING PAGE + 2. "The Sower," _Vanderbilt Collection, Metropolitan Museum, New York_ 46 + 3. "The Gleaners," _The Louvre_ 50 + 4. "The Spaders" 54 + 5. "The Potato Planter," _Shaw Collection_ 58 + 6. "The Grafter," _William Rockefeller Collection_ 62 + 7. "The New-Born Calf," _Art Institute, Chicago_ 66 + 8. "The First Steps," 70 + 9. "The Shepherdess," _Chauchard Collection, Louvre_ 72 +10. "Spring," _The Louvre_ 74 + +RAPHAEL: +11. "Poetry," _The Vatican_ 112 +12. "The Judgment of Solomon," _The Vatican_ 114 +13. The "Disputa," _The Vatican_ 116 +14. "The School of Athens," _The Vatican_ 118 +15. "Parnassus," _The Vatican_ 120 +16. "Jurisprudence," _The Vatican_ 122 +17. "The Mass of Bolsena," _The Vatican_ 124 +18. "The Deliverance of Peter," _The Vatican_ 126 +19. "The Sibyls," _Santa Maria della Pace, Rome_ 128 +20. "Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami," _Gardner Collection_ 130 + +JOHN S. SARGENT: +21. "The Hermit," _Metropolitan Museum, New York_ 136 + +TITIAN: +22. "Saint Jerome in the Desert," _Brera Gallery, Milan_ 142 + +SAINT-GAUDENS: +23. "Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque" 182 +24. "Amor Caritas" 196 +25. "The Butler Children" 206 +26. "Sarah Redwood Lee" 208 +27. "Farragut," _Madison Square, New York_ 212 +28. "Lincoln," _Chicago, Ill._ 214 +29. "Deacon Chapin," _Springfield, Mass._ 216 +30. "Adams Memorial," _Washington, D.C._ 218 +31. "Shaw Memorial," _Boston, Mass._ 220 +32. "Sherman," _The Plaza, Central Park, New York_ 224 + + + + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + + + + +I + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + + +In the history of art, as in the history of politics and in the history +of economics, our modern epoch is marked off from all preceding epochs +by one great event, the French Revolution. Fragonard, who survived that +Revolution to lose himself in a new and strange world, is the last at +the old masters; David, some sixteen years his junior, is the first of +the moderns. Now if we look for the most fundamental distinction between +our modern art and the art of past times, I believe we shall find it to +be this: the art of the past was produced for a public that wanted it +and understood it, by artists who understood and sympathized with their +public; the art of our time has been, for the most part, produced for a +public that did not want it and misunderstood it, by artists who +disliked and despised the public for which they worked. When artist and +public were united, art was homogeneous and continuous. Since the +divorce of artist and public art has been chaotic and convulsive. + +That this divorce between the artist and his public--this dislocation of +the right and natural relations between them--has taken place is +certain. The causes of it are many and deep-lying in our modern +civilization, and I can point out only a few of the more obvious ones. + +The first of these is the emergence of a new public. The art of past +ages had been distinctively an aristocratic art, created for kings and +princes, for the free citizens of slave-holding republics, for the +spiritual and intellectual aristocracy of the church, or for a luxurious +and frivolous nobility. As the aim of the Revolution was the +destruction of aristocratic privilege, it is not surprising that a +revolutionary like David should have felt it necessary to destroy the +traditions of an art created for the aristocracy. In his own art of +painting he succeeded so thoroughly that the painters of the next +generation found themselves with no traditions at all. They had not only +to work for a public of enriched bourgeois or proletarians who had never +cared for art, but they had to create over again the art with which they +endeavored to interest this public. How could they succeed? The rift +between artist and public had begun, and it has been widening ever +since. + +If the people had had little to do with the major arts of painting and +sculpture, there had yet been, all through the Middle Ages and the +Renaissance, a truly popular art--an art of furniture making, of +wood-carving, of forging, of pottery. Every craftsman was an artist in +his degree, and every artist was but a craftsman of a superior sort. Our +machine-making, industrial civilization, intent upon material progress +and the satisfaction of material wants, has destroyed this popular art; +and at the same time that the artist lost his patronage from above he +lost his support from below. He has become a superior person, a sort of +demi-gentleman, but he has no longer a splendid nobility to employ him +or a world of artist artisans to surround him and understand him. + +And to the modern artist, so isolated, with no tradition behind him, no +direction from above and no support from below, the art of all times and +all countries has become familiar through modern means of communication +and modern processes of reproduction. Having no compelling reason for +doing one thing rather than another, or for choosing one or another way +of doing things, he is shown a thousand things that he may do and a +thousand ways of doing them. Not clearly knowing his own mind he hears +the clash and reverberation of a thousand other minds, and having no +certainties he must listen to countless theories. + +Mr. Vedder has spoken of a certain "home-made" character which he +considers the greatest defect of his art, the character of an art +belonging to no distinctive school and having no definite relation to +the time and country in which it is produced. But it is not Mr. Vedder's +art alone that is home-made. It is precisely the characteristic note of +our modern art that all of it that is good for anything is home-made or +self-made. Each artist has had to create his art as best he could out of +his own temperament and his own experience--has sat in his corner like a +spider, spinning his web from his own bowels. If the art so created was +essentially fine and noble the public has at last found it out, but only +after years of neglect have embittered the existence and partially +crippled the powers of its creator. And so, to our modern imagination, +the neglected and misunderstood genius has become the very type of the +great artist, and we have allowed our belief in him to color and distort +our vision of the history of art. We have come to look upon the great +artists of all times as an unhappy race struggling against the +inappreciation of a stupid public, starving in garrets and waiting long +for tardy recognition. + +The very reverse of this is true. With the exception of Rembrandt, who +himself lived in a time of political revolution and of the emergence to +power of a burgher class, you will scarce find an unappreciated genius +in the whole history of art until the beginning of the nineteenth +century. The great masters of the Renaissance, from Giotto to Veronese, +were men of their time, sharing and interpreting the ideals of those +around them, and were recognized and patronized as such. Rembrandt's +greatest contemporary, Rubens, was painter in ordinary to half the +courts of Europe, and Velazquez was the friend and companion of his +king. Watteau and Boucher and Fragonard painted for the frivolous +nobility of the eighteenth century just what that nobility wanted, and +even the precursors of the Revolution, sober and honest Chardin, Greuze +the sentimental, had no difficulty in making themselves understood, +until the revolutionist David became dictator to the art of Europe and +swept them into the rubbish heap with the rest. + +It is not until the beginning of what is known as the Romantic movement, +under the Restoration, that the misunderstood painter of genius +definitely appears. Millet, Corot, Rousseau were trying, with +magnificent powers and perfect single-mindedness, to restore the art of +painting which the Revolution had destroyed. They were men of the utmost +nobility and simplicity of character, as far as possible from the +gloomy, fantastic, vain, and egotistical person that we have come to +accept as the type of unappreciated genius; they were classically minded +and conservative, worshippers of the great art of the past; but they +were without a public and they suffered bitter discouragement and long +neglect. Upon their experience is founded that legend of the +unpopularity of all great artists which has grown to astonishing +proportions. Accepting this legend, and believing that all great artists +are misunderstood, the artist has come to cherish a scorn of the public +for which he works and to pretend a greater scorn than he feels. He +cannot believe himself great _unless_ he is misunderstood, and he hugs +his unpopularity to himself as a sign of genius and arrives at that +sublime affectation which answers praise of his work with an exclamation +of dismay: "Is it as bad as that?" He invents new excesses and +eccentricities to insure misunderstanding, and proclaims the doctrine +that, as anything great must be incomprehensible, so anything +incomprehensible must be great. And the public has taken him, at least +partly, at his word. He may or may not be great, but he is certainly +incomprehensible and probably a little mad. Until he succeeds the public +looks upon the artist as a more or less harmless lunatic. When he +succeeds it is willing to exalt him into a kind of god and to worship +his eccentricities as a part of his divinity. So we arrive at a belief +in the insanity of genius. What would Raphael have thought of such a +notion, or that consummate man of the world, Titian? What would the +serene and mighty Veronese have thought of it, or the cool, clear-seeing +Velazquez? How his Excellency the Ambassador of his Most Catholic +Majesty, glorious Peter Paul Rubens, would have laughed! + +It is this lack of sympathy and understanding between the artist and his +public--this fatal isolation of the artist--that is the cause of nearly +all the shortcomings of modern art; of the weakness of what is known as +official or academic art no less than of the extravagance of the art of +opposition. The artist, being no longer a craftsman, working to order, +but a kind of poet, expressing in loneliness his personal emotions, has +lost his natural means of support. Governments, feeling a responsibility +for the cultivation of art which was quite unnecessary in the days when +art was spontaneously produced in answer to a natural demand, have +tried to put an artificial support in its place. That the artist may +show his wares and make himself known, they have created exhibitions; +that he may be encouraged they have instituted medals and prizes; that +he may not starve they have made government purchases. And these +well-meant efforts have resulted in the creation of pictures which have +no other purpose than to hang in exhibitions, to win medals, and to be +purchased by the government and hung in those more permanent exhibitions +which we call museums. For this purpose it is not necessary that a +picture should have great beauty or great sincerity. It _is_ necessary +that it should be large in order to attract attention and sufficiently +well drawn and executed to seem to deserve recognition. And so was +evolved the salon picture, a thing created for no man's pleasure, not +even the artist's; a thing which is neither the decoration of a public +building nor the possible ornament of a private house; a thing which, +after it has served its temporary purpose, is rolled up and stored in a +loft or placed in a gallery where its essential emptiness becomes more +and more evident as time goes on. Such government-encouraged art had at +least the merit of a well-sustained and fairly high level of +accomplishment in the more obvious elements of painting. But as +exhibitions became larger and larger and the competition engendered by +them grew fiercer, it became increasingly difficult to attract attention +by mere academic merit. So the painters began to search for +sensationalism of subject, and the typical salon picture, no longer +decorously pompous, began to deal in blood and horror and sensuality. It +was Regnault who began this sensation hunt, but it has been carried much +further since his day than he can have dreamed of, and the modern salon +picture is not only tiresome but detestable. + +The salon picture, in its merits and its faults, is peculiarly French, +but the modern exhibition has sins to answer for in other countries than +France. In England it has been responsible for a great deal of +sentimentality and anecdotage which has served to attract the attention +of a public that could not be roused to interest in mere painting. +Everywhere, even in this country, where exhibitions are relatively small +and ill-attended, it has caused a certain stridency and blatancy, a +keying up to exhibition pitch, a neglect of finer qualities for the sake +of immediate effectiveness. + +Under our modern conditions the exhibition has become a necessity, and +it would be impossible for our artists to live or to attain a reputation +without it. The giving of medals and prizes and the purchase of works +of art by the state may be of more doubtful utility, though such efforts +at the encouragement of art probably do more good than harm. But there +is one form of government patronage that is almost wholly beneficial, +and that the only form of it which we have in this country--the awarding +of commissions for the decoration of public buildings. The painter of +mural decorations is in the old historical position, in sound and +natural relations to the public. He is doing something which is wanted +and, if he continues to receive commissions, he may fairly assume that +he is doing it in a way that is satisfactory. With the decorative or +monumental sculptor he is almost alone among modern artists in being +relieved of the necessity of producing something in the isolation of his +studio and waiting to see if any one will care for it; of trying, +against the grain, to produce something that he thinks may appeal to +the public because it does not appeal to himself; or of attempting to +bamboozle the public into buying what neither he nor the public really +cares for. If he does his best he may feel that he is as fairly earning +his livelihood as his fellow workmen, the blacksmith and the +stonecutter, and is as little dependent as they upon either charity or +humbug. The best that government has done for art in France is the +commissioning of the great decorative paintings of Baudry and Puvis. In +this country, also, governments, national, State, or municipal, are +patronizing art in the best possible way, and in making buildings +splendid for the people are affording opportunity for the creation of a +truly popular art. + +Without any artificial aid from the government the illustrator has a +wide popular support and works for the public in a normal way; and, +therefore, illustration has been one of the healthiest and most +vigorous forms of modern art. The portrait-painter, too, is producing +something he knows to be wanted, and, though his art has had to fight +against the competition of the photograph and has been partially +vulgarized by the struggle of the exhibitions, it has yet remained, upon +the whole, comprehensible and human; so that much of the soundest art of +the past century has gone into portraiture. It is the painters of +pictures, landscape or genre, who have most suffered from the +misunderstanding between artist and public. Without guidance some of +them have hewed a path to deserved success. Others have wandered into +strange byways and no-thoroughfares. + +The nineteenth century is strewn with the wrecks of such misunderstood +and misunderstanding artists, but it was about the sixties when their +searching for a way began to lead them in certain clearly marked +directions. There are three paths, in especial, which have been followed +since then by adventurous spirits: the paths of æstheticism, of +scientific naturalism, and of pure self-expression; the paths of +Whistler, of Monet, and of Cézanne. + +Whistler was an artist of refined and delicate talent with great +weaknesses both in temperament and training; being also a very clever +man and a brilliant controversialist, he proceeded to erect a theory +which should prove his weaknesses to be so many virtues, and he nearly +succeeded in convincing the world of its validity. Finding the +representation of nature very difficult, he decided that art should not +concern itself with representation but only with the creation of +"arrangements" and "symphonies." Having no interest in the subject of +pictures, he proclaimed that pictures should have no subjects and that +any interest in the subject is vulgar. As he was a cosmopolitan with no +local ties, he maintained that art had never been national; and as he +was out of sympathy with his time, he taught that "art happens" and that +"there never was an artistic period." According to the Whistlerian +gospel, the artist not only has now no point of contact with the public, +but he should not have and never has had any. He has never been a man +among other men, but has been a dreamer "who sat at home with the women" +and made pretty patterns of line and color because they pleased him. And +the only business of the public is to accept "in silence" what he +chooses to give them. + +This kind of rootless art he practised. Some of the patterns he produced +are delightful, but they are without imagination, without passion, +without joy in the material and visible world--the dainty diversions of +a dilettante. One is glad that so gracefully slender an art should +exist, but if it has seemed great art to us it is because our age is so +poor in anything better. To rank its creator with the abounding masters +of the past is an absurdity. + +In their efforts to escape from the dead-alive art of the salon picture, +Monet and the Impressionists took an entirely different course. The +gallery painter's perfunctory treatment of subject bored them, and they +abandoned subject almost as entirely as Whistler had done. The sound if +tame drawing and the mediocre painting of what they called official art +revolted them as it revolted Whistler; but while he nearly suppressed +representation they could see in art nothing but representation. They +wanted to make that representation truer, and they tried to work a +revolution in art by the scientific analysis of light and the +invention of a new method of laying on paint. Instead of joining in +Whistler's search for pure pattern they fixed their attention on facts +alone, or rather on one aspect of the facts, and in their occupation +with light and the manner of representing it they abandoned form almost +as completely as they had abandoned significance and beauty. + +So it happened that Monet could devote some twenty canvases to the study +of the effects of light, at different hours of the day, upon two straw +stacks in his farmyard. It was admirable practice, no doubt, and neither +scientific analysis nor the study of technical methods is to be +despised; but the interest of the public, after all, is in what an +artist does, not in how he learns to do it. The twenty canvases together +formed a sort of demonstration of the possibilities of different kinds +of lighting. Any one of them, taken singly, is but a portrait of two +straw stacks, and the world will not permanently or deeply care about +those straw stacks. The study of light is, in itself, no more an +exercise of the artistic faculties than the study of anatomy or the +study of perspective; and while Impressionism has put a keener edge upon +some of the tools of the artist, it has inevitably failed to produce a +school of art. + +After Impressionism, what? We have no name for it but +Post-Impressionism. Such men as Cézanne, Gauguin, Van Gogh recognized +the sterility of Impressionism and of a narrow æstheticism, while they +shared the hatred of the æsthetes and the Impressionists for the current +art of the salons. No more than the æsthetes or the Impressionists were +they conscious of any social or universal ideals that demanded +expression. The æsthetes had a doctrine; the Impressionists had a method +and a technic. The Post-Impressionists had nothing, and were driven to +the attempt at pure self-expression--to the exaltation of the great god +Whim. They had no training, they recognized no traditions, they spoke to +no public. Each was to express, as he thought best, whatever he happened +to feel or to think, and to invent, as he went along, the language in +which he should express it. I think some of these men had the elements +of genius in them and might have done good work; but their task was a +heart-breaking and a hopeless one. An art cannot be improvised, and an +artist must have some other guide than unregulated emotion. The path +they entered upon had been immemorially marked "no passing"; for many of +them the end of it was suicide or the madhouse. + +But whatever the aberrations of these, the true +Post-Impressionists--whatever the ugliness, the eccentricity, or the +moral dinginess into which they were betrayed--I believe them to have +been, in the main, honest if unbalanced and ill-regulated minds. +Whatever their errors, they paid the price of them in poverty, in +neglect, in death. With those who pretend to be their descendants to-day +the case is different; they are not paying for their eccentricity or +their madness, they are making it pay. + +The enormous engine of modern publicity has been discovered by these +men. They have learned to advertise, and they have found that morbidity, +eccentricity, indecency, extremes of every kind and of any degree are +capital advertisement. If one cannot create a sound and living art, one +can at least make something odd enough to be talked about; if one cannot +achieve enduring fame, one may make sure of a flaming notoriety. And, as +a money-maker, present notoriety is worth more than future fame, for the +speculative dealer is at hand. His interest is in "quick returns" and +he has no wish to wait until you are famous--or dead--before he can sell +anything you do. His process is to buy anything he thinks he can "boom," +to "boom" it as furiously as possible, and to sell it before the "boom" +collapses. Then he will exploit something else, and there's the rub. +Once you have entered this mad race for notoriety, there is no drawing +out of it. The same sensation will not attract attention a second time; +you must be novel at any cost. You must exaggerate your exaggerations +and out-Herod Herod, for others have learned how easy the game is to +play, and are at your heels. It is no longer a matter of +misunderstanding and being misunderstood by the public; it is a matter +of deliberately flouting and outraging the public--of assuming +incomprehensibility and antagonism to popular feeling as signs of +greatness. And so is founded what Frederic Harrison has called the +"shock-your-grandmother school." + +It is with profound regret that one must name as one of the founders of +this school an artist of real power, who has produced much admirable +work--Auguste Rodin. At the age of thirty-seven he attained a sudden and +resounding notoriety, and from that time he has been the most talked-of +artist in Europe. He was a consummate modeller, a magnificent workman, +but he had always grave faults and striking mannerisms. These faults and +mannerisms he has latterly pushed to greater and greater extremes while +neglecting his great gift, each work being more chaotic and fragmentary +in composition, more hideous in type, more affected and emptier in +execution, until he has produced marvels of mushiness and incoherence +hitherto undreamed of and has set up as public monuments fantastically +mutilated figures with broken legs or heads knocked off. Now, in his +old age, he is producing shoals of drawings the most extraordinary of +which few are permitted to see. Some selected specimens of them hang in +a long row in the Metropolitan Museum, and I assure you, upon my word as +a lifelong student of drawing, they are quite as ugly and as silly as +they look. There is not a touch in them that has any truth to nature, +not a line that has real beauty or expressiveness. They represent the +human figure with the structure of a jellyfish and the movement of a +Dutch doll; the human face with an expression I prefer not to +characterize. If they be not the symptoms of mental decay, they can be +nothing but the means of a gigantic mystification. + +With Henri Matisse we have not to deplore the deliquescence of a great +talent, for we have no reason to suppose he ever had any. It is true +that his admirers will assure you he could once draw and paint as +everybody does; what he could _not_ do was to paint enough better than +everybody does to make his mark in the world; and he was a quite +undistinguished person until he found a way to produce some effect upon +his grandmother the public by shocking her into attention. His method is +to choose the ugliest models to be found; to put them into the most +grotesque and indecent postures imaginable; to draw them in the manner +of a savage, or a depraved child, or a worse manner if that be possible; +to surround his figures with blue outlines half an inch wide; and to +paint them in crude and staring colors, brutally laid on in flat masses. +Then, when his grandmother begins to "sit up," she is told with a grave +face that this is a reaction from naturalism, a revival of abstract line +and color, a subjective art which is not the representation of nature +but the expression of the artist's soul. No wonder she gasps and +stares! + +It seemed, two or three years ago, that the limit of mystification had +been reached--that this comedy of errors could not be carried further; +but human ingenuity is inexhaustible, and we now have whole schools, +Cubists, Futurists, and the like, who joyously vie with each other in +the creation of incredible pictures and of irreconcilable and +incomprehensible theories. The public is inclined to lump them all +together and, so far as their work is concerned, the public is not far +wrong; yet in theory Cubism and Futurism are diametrically opposed to +each other. It is not easy to get any clear conception of the doctrines +of these schools, but, so far as I am able to understand them--and I +have taken some pains to do so--they are something like this: + +Cubism is static; Futurism is kinetic. Cubism deals with bulk; Futurism +deals with motion. The Cubist, by a kind of extension of Mr. Berenson's +doctrine of "tactile values," assumes that the only character of objects +which is of importance to the artist is their bulk and solidity--what he +calls their "volumes." Now the form in which volume is most easily +apprehended is the cube; do we not measure by it and speak of the cubic +contents of anything? The inference is easy: reduce all objects to forms +which can be bounded by planes and defined by straight lines and angles; +make their cubic contents measurable to the eye; transform drawing into +a burlesque of solid geometry; and you have, at once, attained to the +highest art. The Futurist, on the other hand, maintains that we know +nothing but that things are in flux. Form, solidity, weight are +illusions. Nothing exists but motion. Everything is changing every +moment, and if anything were still we ourselves are changing. It is, +therefore, absurd to give fixed boundaries to anything or to admit of +any fixed relations in space. If you are trying to record your +impression of a face it is certain that by the time you have done one +eye the other eye will no longer be where it was--it may be at the other +side of the room. You must cut nature into small bits and shuffle them +about wildly if you are to reproduce what we really see. + +Whatever its extravagance, Cubism remains a form of graphic art. However +pedantic and ridiculous its transformation of drawing, it yet recognizes +the existence of drawing. Therefore, to the Futurist, Cubism is +reactionary. What difference does it make, he asks, whether you draw a +head round or square? Why draw a head at all? The Futurist denies the +fundamental postulates of the art of painting. Painting has always, and +by definition, represented upon a surface objects supposed to lie +beyond it and to be seen through it. Futurism pretends to place the +spectator inside the picture and to represent things around him or +behind him as well as those in front of him. Painting has always assumed +the single moment of vision, and, though it has sometimes placed more +than one picture on the same canvas, it has treated each picture as seen +at a specific instant of time. Futurism attempts systematically to +combine the past and the future with the present, as if all the pictures +in a cinematograph film were to be printed one over the other; to paint +no instant but to represent the movement of time. It aims at nothing +less than the abrogation of all recognized laws, the total destruction +of all that has hitherto passed for art. + +Do you recall the story of the man who tried to count a litter of pigs, +but gave it up because one little pig ran about so fast that he could +not be counted? One finds oneself in somewhat the same predicament when +one tries to describe these "new movements" in art. The movement is so +rapid and the men shift their ground so quickly that there is no telling +where to find them. You have no sooner arrived at some notion of the +difference between Cubism and Futurism than you find your Cubist doing +things that are both Cubist and Futurist, or neither Cubist nor +Futurist, according as you look at them. You find things made up of +geometrical figures to give volume, yet with all the parts many times +repeated to give motion. You find things that have neither bulk nor +motion but look like nothing so much as a box of Chinese tangrams +scattered on a table. Finally, you have assemblages of lines that do not +draw anything, even cubes or triangles; and we are assured that there +is now a newest school of all, called Orphism, which, finding still some +vestiges of intelligibility in any assemblage of lines, reduces +everything to shapeless blotches. Probably the first of Orphic pictures +was that produced by the quite authentic donkey who was induced to smear +a canvas by lashing a tail duly dipped in paint. It was given a title as +Orphic as the painting, was accepted by a jury anxious to find new forms +of talent, and was hung in the _Salon d'Automne._ + +In all this welter of preposterous theories there is but one thing +constant--one thing on which all these theorists are agreed. It is that +all this strange stuff is symbolic and shadows forth the impressions and +emotions of the artist: represents not nature but his feeling about +nature; is the expression of his mind or, as they prefer to call it, his +soul. It may be so. All art is symbolic; images are symbols; words are +symbols; all communication is by symbols. But if a symbol is to serve +any purpose of communication between one mind and another it must be a +symbol accepted and understood by both minds. If an artist is to choose +his symbols to suit himself, and to make them mean anything he chooses, +who is to say what he means or whether he means anything? If a man were +to rise and recite, with a solemn voice, words like "Ajakan maradak +tecor sosthendi," would you know what he meant? If he wished you to +believe that these symbols express the feeling of awe caused by the +contemplation of the starry heavens, he would have to tell you so _in +your own language_; and even then you would have only his word for it. +He may have meant them to express that, but do they? The apologists of +the new schools are continually telling us that we must give the +necessary time and thought to learn the language of these men before we +condemn them. Why should we? Why should not they learn the universal +language of art? It is they who are trying to say something. When they +have learned to speak that language and have convinced us that they have +something to say in it which is worth listening to, then, and not till +then, we may consent to such slight modification of it as may fit it +more closely to their thought. + +If these gentlemen really believe that their capriciously chosen symbols +are fit vehicles for communication with others, why do they fall back on +that old, old symbol, the written word? Why do they introduce, in the +very midst of a design in which everything else is dislocated, a name or +a word in clear Roman letters? Or why do they give their pictures titles +and, lest you should neglect to look in the catalogue, print the title +quite carefully and legibly in the corner of the picture itself? They +know that they must set you to hunting for their announced subject or +you would not look twice at their puzzles. + +Now, there is only one word for this denial of all law, this +insurrection against all custom and tradition, this assertion of +individual license without discipline and without restraint; and that +word is "anarchy." And, as we know, theoretic anarchy, though it may not +always lead to actual violence, is a doctrine of destruction. It is so +in art, and these artistic anarchists are found proclaiming that the +public will never understand or accept their art while anything remains +of the art of the past, and demanding that therefore the art of the past +shall be destroyed. It is actual, physical destruction of pictures and +statues that they call for, and in Italy, that great treasury of the +world's art, has been raised the sinister cry: "Burn the museums!" They +have not yet taken to the torch, but if they were sincere they would do +it; for their doctrine calls for nothing less than the reduction of +mankind to a state of primitive savagery that it may begin again at the +beginning. + +Fortunately, they are not sincere. There may be among them those who +honestly believe in that exaltation of the individual and that revolt +against all law which is the danger of our age. But, for the most part, +if they have broken from the fold and "like sheep have gone astray," +they have shown a very sheep-like disposition to follow the bell-wether. +They are fond of quoting a saying of Gauguin's that "one must be either +a revolutionist or a plagiary"; but can any one tell these +revolutionists apart? Can any one distinguish among them such definite +and logically developed personalities as mark even schoolmen and +"plagiarists" like Meissonier and Gérôme? If any one of these men stood +alone, one might believe his eccentricities to be the mark of an extreme +individuality; one cannot believe it when one finds the same +eccentricities in twenty of them. + +No, it is not for the sake of unhampered personal development that young +artists are joining these new schools; it is because they are offered a +short cut to a kind of success. As there are no more laws and no more +standards, there is nothing to learn. The merest student is at once set +upon a level with the most experienced of his instructors, and boys and +girls in their teens are hailed as masters. Art is at last made easy, +and there are no longer any pupils, for all have become teachers. To +borrow Doctor Johnson's phrase, "many men, many women, and many +children" could produce art after this fashion; and they do. + +So right are the practitioners of this puerile art in their proclaimed +belief that the public will never accept it while anything else exists, +that one might be willing to treat it with the silent contempt it +deserves were it not for the efforts of certain critics and writers for +the press to convince us that it ought to be accepted. Some of these men +seem to be intimidated by the blunders of the past. Knowing that +contemporary criticism has damned almost every true artist of the +nineteenth century, they are determined not to be caught napping; and +they join in shouts of applause as each new harlequin steps upon the +stage. They forget that it is as dangerous to praise ignorantly as to +blame unjustly, and that the railer at genius, though he may seem more +malevolent, will scarce appear so ridiculous to posterity as the dupe of +the mountebank. Others of them are, no doubt, honest victims of that +illusion of progress to which we are all more or less subject--to that +ingrained belief that all evolution is upward and that the latest thing +must necessarily be the best. They forget that the same process which +has relieved man of his tail has deprived the snake of his legs and the +kiwi of his wings. They forget that art has never been and cannot be +continuously progressive; that it is only the sciences connected with +art that are capable of progress; and that the "Henriade" is not a +greater poem than the "Divine Comedy" because Voltaire has learned the +falsity of the Ptolemaic astronomy. Finally, these writers, like other +people, desire to seem knowing and clever; and if you appear to admire +vastly what no one else understands you pass for a clever man. + +I have looked through a good deal of the writings of these "up-to-date" +critics in the effort to find something like an intelligible argument +or a definite statement of belief. I have found nothing but the +continually repeated assumption that these new movements, in all their +varieties, are "living" and "vital." I can find no grounds stated for +this assumption and can suppose only that what is changing with great +rapidity is conceived to be alive; yet I know nothing more productive of +rapid changes than putrefaction. + +Do not be deceived. This is not vital art, it is decadent and corrupt. +True art has always been the expression by the artist of the ideals of +his time and of the world in which he lived--ideals which were his own +because he was a part of that world. A living and healthy art never has +existed and never can exist except through the mutual understanding and +co-operation of the artist and his public. Art is made for man and has a +social function to perform. We have a right to demand that it shall be +both human and humane; that it shall show some sympathy in the artist +with our thoughts and our feelings; that it shall interpret our ideals +to us in that universal language which has grown up in the course of +ages. We have a right to reject with pity or with scorn the stammerings +of incompetence, the babble of lunacy, or the vaporing of imposture. But +mutual understanding implies a duty on the part of the public as well as +on the part of the artist, and we must give as well as take. We must be +at the pains to learn something of the language of art in which we bid +the artist speak. If we would have beauty from him we must sympathize +with his aspiration for beauty. Above all, if we would have him +interpret for us our ideals we must have ideals worthy of such +interpretation. Without this co-operation on our part we may have a +better art than we deserve, for noble artists will be born, and they +will give us an art noble in its essence however mutilated and shorn of +its effectiveness by our neglect. It is only by being worthy of it that +we can hope to have an art we may be proud of--an art lofty in its +inspiration, consummate in its achievement, disciplined in its strength. + + + + +II + +JEAN FRANÇOIS MILLET + + +Jean François Millet, who lived hard and died poor, is now perhaps the +most famous artist of the nineteenth century. His slightest work is +fought for by dealers and collectors, and his more important pictures, +if they chance to change hands, bring colossal and almost incredible +prices. And of all modern reputations his, so far as we can see, seems +most likely to be enduring. If any painter of the immediate past is +definitively numbered with the great masters, it is he. Yet the popular +admiration for his art is based on a I misapprehension almost as +profound as that of those contemporaries who decried and opposed him. +They thought him violent, rude, ill-educated, a "man of the woods," a +revolutionist, almost a communist. We are apt to think of him as a +gentle sentimentalist, a soul full of compassion for the hard lot of the +poor, a man whose art achieves greatness by sheer feeling rather than by +knowledge and intellect. In spite of his own letters, in spite of the +testimony of many who knew him well, in spite of more than one piece of +illuminating criticism, these two misconceptions endure; and, for the +many, Millet is still either the painter of "The Man with the Hoe," a +powerful but somewhat exceptional work, or the painter of "L'Angelus," +precisely the least characteristic picture he ever produced. There is a +legendary Millet, in many ways a very different man from the real one, +and, while the facts of his life are well known and undisputed, the +interpretation of them is colored by preconceptions and strained to make +them fit the legend. + +Altogether too much, for instance, has been made of the fact that +Millet was born a peasant. He was so, but so were half the artists and +poets who come up to Paris and fill the schools and the cafés of the +student quarters. To any one who has known these young _rapins_, and +wondered at the grave and distinguished members of the Institute into +which many of them have afterward developed, it is evident that this +studious youth--who read Virgil in the original and Homer and +Shakespeare and Goethe in translations--probably had a much more +cultivated mind and a much sounder education than most of his fellow +students under Delaroche. Seven years after this Norman farmer's son +came to Paris, with a pension of 600 francs voted by the town council of +Cherbourg, the son of a Breton sabot-maker followed him there with a +precisely similar pension voted by the town council of Roche-sur-Yon; +and the pupil of Langlois had had at least equal opportunities with +the pupil of Sartoris. Both cases were entirely typical of French +methods of encouraging the fine arts, and the peasant origin of Millet +is precisely as significant as the peasant origin of Baudry. + +[Illustration: Plate 2.--Millet. "The Sower." +In the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vanderbilt collection.] + +Baudry persevered in the course marked out for him and, after failing +three times, received the _Prix de Rome_ and became the pensioner of the +state. Millet took umbrage at Delaroche's explanation that his support +was already pledged to another candidate for the prize, and left the +_atelier_ of that master after little more than a year's work. But that +he had already acquired most of what was to be learned there is shown, +if by nothing else, by the master's promise to push him for the prize +the year following. This was in 1838, and for a year or two longer +Millet worked in the life classes of Suisse and Boudin without a master. +His pension was first cut down and then withdrawn altogether, and he +was thrown upon his own resources. His struggles and his poverty during +the next few years were those of many a young artist, aggravated, in his +case, by two imprudent marriages. But during all the time that he was +painting portraits in Cherbourg or little nudes in Paris he was steadily +gaining reputation and making friends. If we had not the pictures +themselves to show us how able and how well-trained a workman he was, +the story told us by Wyatt Eaton, in "Modern French Masters," would +convince us. It was in the last year of Millet's life that he told the +young American how, in his early days, a dealer would come to him for a +picture and, "having nothing painted, he would offer the dealer a book +and ask him to wait for a little while that he might add a few touches +to the picture." He would then go into his studio and take a fresh +canvas, or a panel, and in two hours bring out a little nude figure, +which he had painted during that time, and for which he would receive +twenty or twenty-five francs. It was the work of this time that Diaz +admired for its color and its "immortal flesh painting"; that caused +Guichard, a pupil of Ingres, to tell his master that Millet was the +finest draughtsman of the new school; that earned for its author the +title of "master of the nude." + +He did all kinds of work in these days, even painting signs and +illustrating sheet music, and it was all capital practice for a young +man, but it was not what he wanted to do. A great deal has been made of +the story of his overhearing some one speak of him as "a fellow who +never paints anything but naked women," and he is represented as +undergoing something like a sudden conversion and as resolving to "do no +more of the devil's work." As a matter of fact, he had, from the +first, wanted to paint "men at work in the fields," with their "fine +attitudes," and he only tried his hand at other things because he had +his living to earn. Sensier saw what seems to have been the first sketch +for "The Sower" as early as 1847, and it existed long before that, while +"The Winnower" was exhibited in 1848; and the overheard conversation is +said to have taken place in 1849. There was nothing indecent or immoral +in Millet's early work, and the best proof that he felt no moral +reprobation for the painting of the nude--as what true painter, +especially in France, ever did?--is that he returned to it in the height +of his power and, in the picture of the little "Goose Girl" (Pl. 1) by +the brook side, her slim, young body bared for the bath, produced the +loveliest of his works. No, what happened to Millet in 1849 was simply +that he resolved to do no more pot-boiling, to consult no one's taste +but his own, to paint what he pleased and as he pleased, if he starved +for it. He went to Barbizon for a summer's holiday and to escape the +cholera. He stayed there because living was cheap and the place was +healthful, and because he could find there the models and the subjects +on which he built his highly abstract and ideal art. + +[Illustration: Plate 3.--Millet. "The Gleaners." +In the Louvre.] + +At Barbizon he neither resumed the costume nor led the life of a +peasant. He wore sabots, as hundreds of other artists have done, before +and since, when living in the country in France. Sabots are very cheap +and very dry and not uncomfortable when you have acquired the knack of +wearing them. In other respects he dressed and lived like a small +bourgeois, and was _monsieur_ to the people about him. Barbizon was +already a summer resort for artists before he came there, and the inn +was full of painters; while others, of whom Rousseau was one, were +settled there more or less permanently. It is but a short distance from +Paris, and the exhibitions and museums were readily accessible. The life +that Millet lived there was that of many poor, self-respecting, +hard-working artists, and if he had been a landscape painter that life +would never have seemed in any way exceptional. It is only because he +was a painter of the figure that it seems odd he should have lived in +the country; only because he painted peasants that he has been thought +of as a peasant himself. If he accepted the name, with a kind of pride, +it was in protest against the frivolity and artificiality of the +fashionable art of the day. But if too much has been made of Millet's +peasant origin, perhaps hardly enough has been made of his race. It is +at least interesting that the two Frenchmen whose art has most in +common with his, Nicolas Poussin and Pierre Corneille, should have been +Normans like himself. In the severely restrained, grandly simple, +profoundly classical work of these three men, that hard-headed, +strong-handed, austere, and manly race has found its artistic +expression. + +For Millet is neither a revolutionary nor a sentimentalist, nor even a +romanticist; he is essentially a classicist of the classicists, a +conservative of the conservatives, the one modern exemplar of the grand +style. It is because his art is so old that it was "too new" for even +Corot to understand it; because he harked back beyond the +pseudoclassicism of his time to the great art of the past, and was +classic as Phidias and Giotto and Michelangelo were classic, that he +seemed strange to his contemporaries. In everything he was conservative. +He hated change; he wanted things to remain as they had always been. He +did not especially pity the hard lot of the peasant; he considered it +the natural and inevitable lot of man who "eats bread in the sweat of +his brow." He wanted the people he painted "to look as if they belonged +to their place--as if it would be impossible for them ever to think of +being anything else but what they are." In the herdsman and the +shepherd, the sower and the reaper, he saw the immemorial types of +humanity whose labors have endured since the world began and were +essentially what they now are when Virgil wrote his "Georgics" and when +Jacob kept the flocks of Laban. This is the note of all his work. It is +the permanent, the essential, the eternally significant that he paints. +The apparent localization of his subjects in time and place is an +illusion. He is not concerned with the nineteenth century or with +Barbizon but with mankind. At the very moment when the English +Pre-raphaelites were trying to found a great art on the exhaustive +imitation of natural detail, he eliminated detail as much as possible. +At the very beginning of our modern preoccupation with the direct +representation of facts, he abandoned study from the model almost +entirely and could say that he "had never painted from nature." His +subjects would have struck the amiable Sir Joshua as trivial, yet no one +has ever more completely followed that writer's precepts. His confession +of faith is in the words, "One must be able to make use of the trivial +for the expression of the sublime"; and this painter of "rustic genre" +is the world's greatest master of the sublime after Michelangelo. + +[Illustration: Plate 4.--Millet. "The Spaders."] + +The comparison with Michelangelo is inevitable and has been made again +and again by those who have felt the elemental grandeur of Millet's +work. As a recent writer has remarked: "An art highly intellectualized, +so as to convey a great idea with the lucidity of language, must needs +be controlled by genius akin to that which inspired the ceiling +paintings of the Sistine Chapel."[A] This was written of the Trajanic +sculptors, whose works both Michelangelo and Millet studied and admired, +and indeed it is to this old Roman art, or to the still older art of +Greece, that one must go for the truest parallel of Millet's temper and +his manner of working. He was less impatient, less romantic and +emotional than Michelangelo; he was graver, quieter, more serene; and if +he had little of the Greek sensuousness and the Greek love of physical +beauty, he had much of the antique clarity and simplicity. To express +his idea clearly, logically, and forcibly; to make a work of art that +should be "all of a piece" and in which "things should be where they +are for a purpose"; to admit nothing for display, for ornament, even for +beauty, that did not necessarily and inevitably grow out of his central +theme, and to suppress with an iron rigidity everything useless or +superfluous--this was his constant and conscious effort. It is an ideal +eminently austere and intellectual--an ideal, above all, especially and +eternally classic. + +[A] Eugénie Strong, "Roman Sculpture," p. 224. + +Take, for an instance, the earliest of his masterpieces, the first great +picture by which he marked his emancipation and his determination +henceforth to produce art as he understood it without regard to the +preferences of others. Many of his preliminary drawings and studies +exist and we can trace, more or less clearly, the process by which the +final result was arrived at. At first we have merely a peasant sowing +grain; an everyday incident, truly enough observed but nothing more. +Gradually the background is cut down, the space restricted, the figure +enlarged until it fills its frame as a metope of the Parthenon is +filled. The gesture is ever enlarged and given more sweep and majesty, +the silhouette is simplified and divested of all accidental or +insignificant detail. A thousand previous observations are compared and +resumed in one general and comprehensive formula, and the typical has +been evolved from the actual. What generations of Greek sculptors did in +their slow perfectioning of certain fixed types he has done almost at +once. We have no longer a man sowing, but "The Sower" (Pl. 2), +justifying the title he instinctively gave it by its air of permanence, +of inevitability, of universality. All the significance which there is +or ever has been for mankind in that primæval action of sowing the seed +is crystallized into its necessary expression. The thing is done once +for all, and need never--can never be done again. Has any one else +had this power since Michelangelo created his "Adam"? + +[Illustration: Plate 5.--Millet. "The Potato Planters." +In the Quincy A. Shaw Collection.] + +If even Millet never again attained quite the august impressiveness of +this picture it is because no other action of rustic man has so wide or +so deep a meaning for us as this of sowing. All the meaning there is in +an action he could make us feel with entire certainty, and always he +proceeds by this method of elimination, concentration, simplification, +insistence on the essential and the essential only. One of the most +perfect of all his pictures--more perfect than "The Sower" on account of +qualities of mere painting, of color, and of the rendering of landscape, +of which I shall speak later--is "The Gleaners" (Pl. 3). Here one figure +is not enough to express the continuousness of the movement; the utmost +simplification will not make you feel, as powerfully as he wishes you to +feel it, the crawling progress, the bending together of back and +thighs, the groping of worn fingers in the stubble. The line must be +reinforced and reduplicated, and a second figure, almost a facsimile of +the first, is added. Even this is not enough. He adds a third figure, +not gathering the ear, but about to do so, standing, but stooped forward +and bounded by one great, almost uninterrupted curve from the peak of +the cap over her eyes to the heel which half slips out of the sabot, and +the thing is done. The whole day's work is resumed in that one moment. +The task has endured for hours and will endure till sunset, with only an +occasional break while the back is half-straightened--there is not time +to straighten it wholly. It is the triumph of significant composition, +as "The Sower" is the triumph of significant draughtsmanship. + +Or, when an action is more complicated and difficult of suggestion, as +is that, for instance, of digging, he takes it at the beginning and at +the end, as in "The Spaders" (Pl. 4), and makes you understand +everything between. One man is doubled over his spade, his whole weight +brought to bear on the pressing foot which drives the blade into the +ground. The other, with arms outstretched, gives the twisting motion +which lets the loosened earth fall where it is to lie. Each of these +positions is so thoroughly understood and so definitely expressed that +all the other positions of the action are implied in them. You feel the +recurrent rhythm of the movement and could almost count the falling of +the clods. + +So far did Millet push the elimination of non-essentials that his heads +have often scarcely any features, his hands, one might say, are without +fingers, and his draperies are so simplified as to suggest the witty +remark that his peasants are too poor to afford any folds in their +garments. The setting of the great, bony planes of jaw and cheek and +temple, the bulk and solidity of the skull, and the direction of the +face--these were, often enough, all he wanted of a head. Look at the +hand of the woman in "The Potato Planters" (Pl. 5), or at those of the +man in the same picture, and see how little detail there is in them, yet +how surely the master's sovereign draughtsmanship has made you feel +their actual structure and function! And how inevitably the garments, +with their few and simple folds, mould and accent the figures beneath +them, "becoming, as it were, a part of the body and expressing, even +more than the nude, the larger and simpler forms of nature"! How +explicitly the action of the bodies is registered, how perfectly the +amount of effort apparent is proportioned to the end to be attained! One +can feel, to an ounce, it seems, the strain upon the muscles implied by +that hoe-full of earth. Or look at the easier attitude of "The +Grafter" (Pl. 6), engaged upon his gentler task, and at the monumental +silhouette of the wife, standing there, babe in arms, a type of eternal +motherhood and of the fruitfulness to come. + +[Illustration: Plate 6.--Millet. "The Grafter." +In the collection of William Rockefeller.] + +Oftener than anything, perhaps, it was the sense of weight that +interested Millet. It is the adjustment of her body to the weight of the +child she carries that gives her statuesque pose to the wife of the +grafter. It is the drag of the buckets upon the arms that gives her +whole character to the magnificent "Woman Carrying Water," in the +Vanderbilt collection. It is the erect carriage, the cautious, rhythmic +walk, keeping step together, forced upon them by the sense of weight, +which gives that gravity and solemnity to the bearers of "The New-Born +Calf" (Pl. 7), which was ridiculed by Millet's critics as more befitting +the bearers of the bull Apis or the Holy Sacrament. The artist himself +was explicit in this instance as in that of the "Woman Carrying Water." +"The expression of two men carrying a load on a litter," he says, +"naturally depends on the weight which rests upon their arms. Thus, if +the weight is equal, their expression will be the same, whether they +bear the Ark of the Covenant or a calf, an ingot of gold or a stone." +Find that expression, whether in face or figure, render it clearly, +"with largeness and simplicity," and you have a great, a grave, a +classic work of art. "We are never so truly Greek," he said, "as when we +are simply painting our own impressions." Certainly his own way of +painting his impressions was more Greek than anything else in the whole +range of modern art. + +In the epic grandeur of such pictures as these there is something akin +to sadness, though assuredly Millet did not mean them to be sad. Did he +not say of the "Woman Carrying Water": "I have avoided, as I always do, +with a sort of horror, everything that might verge on the sentimental"? +He wished her to seem "to do her work simply and cheerfully ... as a +part of her daily task and the habit of her life." And he was not always +in the austere and epical mood. He could be idyllic as well, and if he +could not see "the joyous side" of life or nature he could feel and make +us feel the charm of tranquillity. Indeed, this remark of his about the +joyous side of things was made in the dark, early days when life was +hardest for him. He broadened in his view as he grew older and +conditions became more tolerable, and he has painted a whole series of +little pictures of family life and of childhood that, in their smiling +seriousness, are endlessly delightful. The same science, the same +thoughtfulness, the same concentration and intellectual grasp that +defined for us the superb gesture of "The Sower" have gone to the +depiction of the adorable uncertainty, between walking and falling, of +those "First Steps" (Pl. 8) from the mother's lap to the outstretched +arms of the father; and the result, in this case as in the other, is a +thing perfectly and permanently expressed. Whatever Millet has done is +done. He has "characterized the type," as it was his dream to do, and +written "hands off" across his subject for all future adventurers. + +Finally, he rises to an almost lyric fervor in that picture of the +little "Goose Girl" bathing, which is one of the most purely and +exquisitely beautiful things in art. In this smooth, young body +quivering with anticipation of the coolness of the water; in these +rounded, slender limbs with their long, firm, supple lines; in the +unconscious, half-awkward grace of attitude and in the glory of +sunlight splashing through the shadow of the willows, there is a whole +song of joy and youth and the goodness of the world. The picture exists +in a drawing or pastel, which has been photographed by Braun, as well as +in the oil-painting, and Millet's habit of returning again and again to +a favorite subject renders it difficult to be certain which is the +earlier of the two; but I imagine this drawing to be a study for the +picture. At first sight the figure in it is more obviously beautiful +than in the other version, and it is only after a time that one begins +to understand the changes that the artist was impelled to make. It is +almost too graceful, too much like an antique nymph. No one could find +any fault with it, but by an almost imperceptible stiffening of the line +here and there, a little greater turn of the foot upon the ankle and of +the hand upon the wrist, the figure in the painting has been given an +accent of rusticity that makes it more human, more natural, and more +appealing. She is no longer a possible Galatea or Arethusa, she is only +a goose girl, and we feel but the more strongly on that account the +eternal poem of the healthy human form. + +[Illustration: Plate 7.--Millet. "The New-Born Calf." +In the Art Institute, Chicago.] + +The especial study of the nineteenth century was landscape, and Millet +was so far a man of his time that he was a great landscape painter; but +his treatment of landscape was unlike any other, and, like his own +treatment of the figure, in its insistence on essentials, its +elimination of the accidental, its austere and grand simplicity. I have +heard, somewhere, a story of his saying, in answer to praise of his work +or inquiry as to his meaning: "I was trying to express the difference +between the things that lie flat and the things that stand upright." +That is the real motive of one of his masterpieces--one that in some +moods seems the greatest of them all--"The Shepherdess" (Pl. 9), that +is, or used to be, in the Chauchard collection. In this nobly tranquil +work, in which there is no hint of sadness or revolt, are to be found +all his usual inevitableness of composition and perfection of +draughtsmanship--note the effect of repetition in the sheep, "forty +feeding like one"--but the glory of the picture is in the infinite +recession of the plain that lies flat, the exact notation of the +successive positions upon it of the things that stand upright, from the +trees and the hay wain in the extreme distance, almost lost in sky, +through the sheep and the sheep-dog and the shepherdess herself, +knitting so quietly, to the dandelions in the foreground, each with its +"aureole" of light. Of these simple, geometrical relations, and of the +enveloping light and air by which they are expressed, he has made a hymn +of praise. + +The background of "The Gleaners," with its baking stubble-field under +the midday sun, its grain stacks and laborers and distant farmstead, all +tremulous in the reflected waves of heat, indistinct and almost +indecipherable yet unmistakable, is nearly as wonderful; and no one has +ever so rendered the solemnity and the mystery of night as has he in the +marvellous "Sheepfold" of the Walters collection. But the greatest of +all his landscapes--one of the greatest landscapes ever painted--is his +"Spring" (Pl. 10), of the Louvre, a pure landscape this time, containing +no figure. In the intense green of the sunlit woods against the black +rain-clouds that are passing away, in the jewel-like brilliancy of the +blossoming apple-trees, and the wet grass in that clear air after the +shower; in the glorious rainbow drawn in dancing light across the sky, +we may see, if anywhere in art, some reflection of the "infinite +splendors" which Millet tells us he saw in nature. + +[Illustration: Plate 8.--Millet. "The First Steps."] + +In the face of such results as these it seems absurd to discuss the +question whether or not Millet was technically a master of his trade, as +if the methods that produced them could possibly be anything but good +methods for the purpose; but it is still too much the fashion to say and +think that the great artist was a poor painter--to speak slightingly of +his accomplishment in oil-painting and to seem to prefer his drawings +and pastels to his pictures. We have seen that he was a supremely able +technician in his pot-boiling days and that the color and handling of +his early pictures were greatly admired by so brilliant a virtuoso as +Diaz. But this "flowery manner" would not lend itself to the expression +of his new aims and he had to invent another. He did so stumblingly at +first, and the earliest pictures of his grand style have a certain +harshness and ruggedness of surface and heaviness of color which his +critics could not forgive any more than the Impressionists, who have +outdone that ruggedness, can forgive him his frequent use of a warm +general tone inclining to brownness. His ideal of form and of +composition he possessed complete from the beginning; his mastery of +light and color and the handling of materials was slower of acquirement; +but he did acquire it, and in the end he is as absolute a master of +painting as of drawing. He did not see nature in blue and violet, as +Monet has taught us to see it, and little felicities and facilities of +rendering, and anything approaching cleverness or the parade of +virtuosity he hated; but he knew just what could be done with thick or +thin painting, with opaque or transparent pigment, and he could make his +few and simple colors say anything he chose. In his mature work there is +a profound knowledge of the means to be employed and a great economy +in their use, and there is no approach to indiscriminate or meaningless +loading. "Things are where they are for a purpose," and if the surface +of a picture is rough in any place it is because just that degree of +roughness was necessary to attain the desired effect. He could make mere +paint express light as few artists have been able to do--"The +Shepherdess" is flooded with it--and he could do this without any +sacrifice of the sense of substance in the things on which the light +falls. If some of his canvases are brown it is because brown seemed to +him the appropriate note to express what he had to say; "The Gleaners" +glows with almost the richness of a Giorgione, and other pictures are +honey-toned or cool and silvery or splendidly brilliant. And in whatever +key he painted, the harmony of his tones and colors is as large, as +simple, and as perfect as the harmony of his lines and masses. + +[Illustration: Plate 9.--Millet. "The Shepherdess." +In the Chauchard collection, Louvre.] + +But if we cannot admit that Millet's drawings are better than his +paintings, we may be very glad he did them. His great epic of the soil +must have lacked many episodes, perhaps whole books and cantos, if it +had been written only in the slower and more elaborate method. The +comparative slightness and rapidity of execution of his drawings and +pastels enabled him to register many inventions and observations that we +must otherwise have missed, and many of these are of the highest value. +His long training in seizing the essential in anything he saw enabled +him, often, to put more meaning into a single rapid line than another +could put into a day's painful labor, and some of his slightest sketches +are astonishingly and commandingly expressive. Other of his drawings +were worked out and pondered over almost as lovingly as his completest +pictures. But so instinctively and inevitably was he a composer that +everything he touched is a complete whole--his merest sketch or his most +elaborated design is a unit. He has left no fragments. His paintings, +his countless drawings, his few etchings and woodcuts are all of a +piece. About everything there is that air of finality which marks the +work destined to become permanently a classic. + +[Illustration: Plate 10.--Millet. "Spring." +In the Louvre.] + +Here and there, by one or another writer, most or all of what I have +been trying to say has been said already. It is the more likely to be +true. And if these true things have been said, many other things have +been said also which seem to me not so true, or little to the purpose, +so that the image I have been trying to create must differ, for better +or for worse, from that which another might have made. At least I may +have looked at the truth from a slightly different angle and so have +shown it in a new perspective. And, at any rate, it is well that true +things should be said again from time to time. It can do no harm that +one more person should endeavor to give a reason for his admiration of a +great and true artist and should express his conviction that among the +world's great masters the final place of Jean François Millet is not +destined to be the lowest. + + + + + +III + +THE ILLUSION OF PROGRESS[B] + +[B] Read before the joint meeting of The American Academy of Arts and +Letters and The National Institute of Arts and Letters, December 13, 1912. + + +In these days all of us, even Academicians, are to some extent believers +in progress. Our golden age is no longer in the past, but in the future. +We know that our early ancestors were a race of wretched cave-dwellers, +and we believe that our still earlier ancestors were possessed of tails +and pointed ears. Having come so far, we are sometimes inclined to +forget that not every step has been an advance and to entertain an +illogical confidence that each future step must carry us still further +forward; having indubitably progressed in many things, we think of +ourselves as progressing in all. And as the pace of progress in science +and in material things has become more and more rapid, we have come to +expect a similar pace in art and letters, to imagine that the art of the +future must be far finer than the art of the present or than that of the +past, and that the art of one decade, or even of one year, must +supersede that of the preceding decade or the preceding year, as the +1913 model in automobiles supersedes the model of 1912. More than ever +before "To have done is to hang quite out of fashion," and the only +title to consideration is to do something quite obviously new or to +proclaim one's intention of doing something newer. The race grows madder +and madder. It was scarce two years since we first heard of "Cubism" +when the "Futurists" were calling the "Cubists" reactionary. Even the +gasping critics, pounding manfully in the rear, have thrown away all +impedimenta of traditional standards in the desperate effort to keep up +with what seems less a march than a stampede. + +But while we talk so loudly of progress in the arts we have an uneasy +feeling that we are not really progressing. If our belief in our own art +were as full-blooded as was that of the great creative epochs, we should +scarce be so reverent of the art of the past. It is, perhaps, a sign of +anæmia that we have become founders of museums and conservers of old +buildings. If we are so careful of our heritage, it is surely from some +doubt of our ability to replace it. When art has been vigorously alive +it has been ruthless in its treatment of what has gone before. No +cathedral builder thought of reconciling his own work to that of the +builder who preceded him; he built in his own way, confident of its +superiority. And when the Renaissance builder came, in his turn, he +contemptuously dismissed all mediæval art as "Gothic" and barbarous, and +was as ready to tear down an old façade as to build a new one. Even the +most cock-sure of our moderns might hesitate to emulate Michelangelo in +his calm destruction of three frescoes by Perugino to make room for his +own "Last Judgment." He, at least, had the full courage of his +convictions, and his opinion of Perugino is of record. + +Not all of us would consider even Michelangelo's arrogance entirely +justified, but it is not only the Michelangelos who have had this belief +in themselves. Apparently the confidence of progress has been as great +in times that now seem to us decadent as in times that we think of as +truly progressive. The past, or at least the immediate past, has always +seemed "out of date," and each generation, as it made its entrance on +the stage, has plumed itself upon its superiority to that which was +leaving it. The architect of the most debased baroque grafted his +"improvements" upon the buildings of the high Renaissance with an +assurance not less than that with which David and his contemporaries +banished the whole charming art of the eighteenth century. Van Orley and +Frans Floris were as sure of their advance upon the ancient Flemish +painting of the Van Eycks and of Memling as Rubens himself must have +been of his advance upon them. + +We can see plainly enough that in at least some of these cases the sense +of progress was an illusion. There was movement, but it was not always +forward movement. And if progress was illusory in some instances, may it +not, possibly, have been so in all? It is at least worth inquiry how far +the fine arts have ever been in a state of true progress, going forward +regularly from good to better, each generation building on the work of +its predecessors and surpassing that work, in the way in which science +has normally progressed when material conditions were favorable. + +If, with a view to answering this question, we examine, however +cursorily, the history of the five great arts, we shall find a somewhat +different state of affairs in the case of each. In the end it may be +possible to formulate something like a general rule that shall accord +with all the facts. Let us begin with the greatest and simplest of the +arts, the art of poetry. + +In the history of poetry we shall find less evidence of progress than +anywhere else, for it will be seen that its acknowledged masterpieces +are almost invariably near the beginning of a series rather than near +the end. Almost as soon as a clear and flexible language has been formed +by any people, a great poem has been composed in that language, which +has remained not only unsurpassed, but unequalled, by any subsequent +work. Homer is for us, as he was for the Greeks, the greatest of their +poets; and if the opinion could be taken of all cultivated readers in +those nations that have inherited the Greek tradition, it is doubtful +whether he would not be acclaimed the greatest poet of the ages. Dante +has remained the first of Italian poets, as he was one of the earliest. +Chaucer, who wrote when our language was transforming itself from +Anglo-Saxon into English, has still lovers who are willing for his sake +to master what is to them almost a foreign tongue, and yet other lovers +who ask for new translations of his works into our modern idiom; while +Shakespeare, who wrote almost as soon as that transformation had been +accomplished, is universally reckoned one of the greatest of world +poets. There have, indeed, been true poets at almost all stages of the +world's history, but the pre-eminence of such masters as these can +hardly be questioned, and if we looked to poetry alone for a type of the +arts, we should almost be forced to conclude that art is the reverse of +progressive. We should think of it as gushing forth in full splendor +when the world is ready for it, and as unable ever again to rise to the +level of its fount. + +The art of architecture is later in its beginning than that of poetry, +for it can exist only when men have learned to build solidly and +permanently. A nomad may be a poet, but he cannot be an architect; a +herdsman might have written the Book of Job, but the great builders are +dwellers in cities. But since men first learned to build they have never +quite forgotten how to do so. At all times there have been somewhere +peoples who knew enough of building to mould its utility into forms of +beauty, and the history of architecture may be read more continuously +than that of any other art. It is a history of constant change and of +continuous development, each people and each age forming out of the old +elements a new style which should express its mind, and each style +reaching its point of greatest distinctiveness only to begin a further +transformation into something else; but is it a history of progress? +Building, indeed, has progressed at one time or another. The Romans, +with their domes and arches, were more scientific builders than the +Greeks, with their simple post and lintel, but were they better +architects? We of to-day, with our steel construction, can scrape the +sky with erections that would have amazed the boldest of mediæval +craftsmen; can we equal his art? If we ask where in the history of +architecture do its masterpieces appear, the answer must be: "Almost +anywhere." Wherever men have had the wealth and the energy to build +greatly, they have builded beautifully, and the distinctions are less +between style and style or epoch and epoch than between building and +building: The masterpieces of one time are as the masterpieces of +another, and no man may say that the nave of Amiens is finer than the +Parthenon or that the Parthenon is nobler than the nave of Amiens. One +may say only that each is perfect in its kind, a supreme expression of +the human spirit. + +Of the art of music I must speak with the diffidence becoming to the +ignorant; but it seems to me to consist of two elements and to contain +an inspirational art as direct and as simple as that of poetry, and a +science so difficult that its fullest mastery is of very recent +achievement. In melodic invention it is so far from progressive that its +most brilliant masters are often content to elaborate and to decorate a +theme old enough to have no history--a theme the inventor of which has +been so entirely forgotten that we think of it as sprung not from the +mind of one man, but from that of a whole people, and call it a +folk-song. The song is almost as old as the race, but the symphony has +had to wait for the invention of many instruments and for a mastery of +the laws of harmony, and so symphonic music is a modern art. We are +still adding new instruments to the orchestra and admitting to our +compositions new combinations of sounds, but have we in a hundred years +made any essential progress even in this part of the art? Have we +produced anything, I will not say greater, but anything as great as the +noblest works of Bach and Beethoven? + +Already, and before considering the arts of painting and sculpture, we +are coming within sight of our general law. This law seems to be that, +so far as an art is dependent upon any form of exact knowledge, so far +it partakes of the nature of science and is capable of progress. So far +as it is expressive of a mind and soul, its greatness is dependent upon +the greatness of that mind and soul, and it is incapable of progress. It +may even be the reverse of progressive, because as an art becomes more +complicated and makes ever greater demands upon technical mastery, it +becomes more difficult as a medium of expression, while the mind to be +expressed becomes more sophisticated and less easy of expression in any +medium. It would take a greater mind than Homer's to express modern +ideas in modern verse with Homer's serene perfection; it would take, +perhaps, a greater mind than Bach's to employ all the resources of +modern music with his glorious ease and directness. And greater minds +than those of Bach and Homer the world has not often the felicity to +possess. + +The arts of painting and sculpture are imitative arts above all others, +and therefore more dependent than any others upon exact knowledge, more +tinged with the quality of science. Let us see how they illustrate our +supposed law. + +Sculpture depends, as does architecture, upon certain laws of proportion +in space which are analogous to the laws of proportion in time and in +pitch upon which music is founded. But as sculpture represents the human +figure, whereas architecture and music represent nothing, sculpture +requires for its perfection the mastery of an additional science, which +is the knowledge of the structure and movement of the human body. This +knowledge may be acquired with some rapidity, especially in times and +countries where man is often seen unclothed. So, in the history of +civilizations, sculpture developed early, after poetry, but with +architecture, and before painting and polyphonic music. It reached the +greatest perfection of which it is capable in the age of Pericles, and +from that time progress was impossible to it, and for a thousand years +its movement was one of decline. After the dark ages sculpture was one +of the first arts to revive; and again it develops rapidly--though not +so rapidly as before, conditions of custom and climate being less +favorable to it--until it reaches, in the first half of the sixteenth +century, something near its former perfection. Again it can go no +further; and since then it has changed but has not progressed. In +Phidias, by which name I would signify the sculptor of the pediments of +the Parthenon, we have the coincidence of a superlatively great artist +with the moment of technical and scientific perfection in the art, and a +similar coincidence crowns the work of Michelangelo with a peculiar +glory. But, apart from the work of these two men, a the essential value +of a work of sculpture is by no means always equal to its technical and +scientific completeness. There are archaic statues that are almost as +nobly beautiful as any work by Phidias and more beautiful than almost +any work that has been done since his time. There are bits of Gothic +sculpture that are more valuable expressions of human feeling than +anything produced by the contemporaries of Buonarroti. Even in times of +decadence a great artist has created finer things than could be +accomplished by a mediocre talent of the great epochs, and the world +could ill spare the Victory of Samothrace or the portrait busts of +Houdon. + +As sculpture is one of the simplest of the arts, painting is one of the +most complicated. The harmonies it constructs are composed of almost +innumerable elements of lines and forms and colors and degrees of +light and dark, and the science it professes is no less than that of the +visible aspect of the whole of nature--a science so vast that it never +has been and perhaps never can be mastered in its totality. Anything +approaching a complete art of painting can exist only in an advanced +stage of civilization. An entirely complete art of painting never has +existed and probably never will exist. The history of painting, after +its early stages, is a history of loss here balancing gain there, of a +new means of expression acquired at the cost of an old one. + +We know comparatively little of the painting of antiquity, but we have +no reason to suppose that that art, however admirable, ever attained to +ripeness, and we know that the painting of the Orient has stopped short +at a comparatively early stage of development. For our purpose the art +to be studied is the painting of modern times in Europe from its origin +in the Middle Ages. Even in the beginning, or before the beginning, +while painting is a decadent reminiscence of the past rather than a +prophecy of the new birth, there are decorative splendors in the +Byzantine mosaics hardly to be recaptured. Then comes primitive +painting, an art of the line and of pure color with little modulation +and no attempt at the rendering of solid form. It gradually attains to +some sense of relief by the use of degrees of light and less light; but +the instant it admits the true shadow the old brightness and purity of +color have become impossible. The line remains dominant for a time and +is carried to the pitch of refinement and beauty, but the love for solid +form gradually overcomes it, and in the art of the high Renaissance it +takes a second place. Then light-and-shade begins to be studied for its +own sake; color, no longer pure and bright, but deep and resonant, comes +in again; the line vanishes altogether, and even form becomes +secondary. The last step is taken by Rembrandt, and even color is +subordinated to light-and-shade, which exists alone in a world of +brownness. At every step there has been progress, but there has also +been regress. Perhaps the greatest balance of gain against loss and the +nearest approach to a complete art of painting were with the great +Venetians. The transformation is still going on, and in our own day we +have conquered some corners of the science of visible aspects which were +unexplored by our ancestors. But the balance has turned against us; our +loss has been greater than our gain; and our art, even in its scientific +aspect, is inferior to that of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. + +And just because there never has been a complete art of painting, +entirely rounded and perfected, it is the clearer to us that the final +value of a work in that art never has depended on its approach to such +completion. There is no one supreme master of painting but a long +succession of masters of different yet equal glory. If the masterpieces +of architecture are everywhere because there has often been a complete +art of architecture, the masterpieces of painting are everywhere for the +opposite reason. And if we do not always value a master the more as his +art is more nearly complete, neither do we always value him especially +who has placed new scientific conquests at the disposal of art. Palma +Vecchio painted by the side of Titian, but he is only a minor master; +Botticelli remained of the generation before Leonardo, but he is one of +the immortal great. Paolo Ucello, by his study of perspective, made a +distinct advance in pictorial science, but his interest for us is purely +historic; Fra Angelico made no advance whatever, but he practised +consummately the current art as he found it, and his work is eternally +delightful. At every stage of its development the art of painting has +been a sufficient medium for the expression of a great man's mind; and +wherever and whenever a great man has practised it, the result has been +a great and permanently valuable work of art. + +For this seems, finally, to be the law of all the arts--the one +essential prerequisite to the production of a great work of art is a +great man. You cannot have the art without the man, and when you have +the man you have the art. His time and his surroundings will color him; +his art will not be at one time or place precisely what it might be at +another; but at bottom the art is the man and at all times and in all +countries is just as great as the man. + +Let us clear our minds, then, of the illusion that there is in any +important sense such a thing as progress in the fine arts. We may with +a clear conscience judge every new work for what it appears in itself to +be, asking of it that it be noble and beautiful and reasonable, not that +it be novel or progressive. If it be great art it will always be novel +enough, for there will be a great mind behind it, and no two great minds +are alike. And if it be novel without being great, how shall we be the +better off? There are enough forms of mediocre or evil art in the world +already. Being no longer intimidated by the fetich of progress, when a +thing calling itself a work of art seems to us hideous and degraded, +indecent and insane, we shall have the courage to say so and shall not +care to investigate it further. Detestable things have been produced in +the past, and they are none the less detestable because we are able to +see how they came to be produced. Detestable things are produced now, +and they will be no more admirable if we learn to understand the minds +that create them. Even should such things prove to be not the mere +freaks of a diseased intellect that they seem but a necessary outgrowth +of the conditions of the age and a true prophecy of "the art of the +future," they are not necessarily the better for that. It is only that +the future will be very unlucky in its art. + + + + + +IV + +RAPHAEL + + +There used to be on the cover of the "Portfolio Monographs" little +medallions of Raphael and Rembrandt, placed there, as the editor, Mr. +Hamerton, has somewhere explained, as portraits of the two most widely +influential artists that ever lived. In the eighteenth century, one +imagines, Rembrandt's presence by the side of Raphael would have been +thought little less than a scandal. To-day it is Raphael's place that +would be contested, and he would be superseded, likely enough, by +Velazquez. + +There is no more striking instance of the vicissitudes of critical +opinion than the sudden fall of Raphael from his conceded rank as "the +prince of painters." Up to the middle of the nineteenth century his +right to that title was so uncontested that it alone was a sufficient +identification of him--only one man could possibly be meant. That he +should ever need defending or re-explaining to a generation grown cold +to him would have seemed incredible. Then came the rediscovery of an +earlier art that seemed more frank and simple than his; still later the +discovery of Rembrandt and Velazquez--the romanticist and the +naturalist--and Raphael, as a living influence, almost ceased to exist. +It was but a few years ago that the author of a volume of essays on art +was gravely praised by a reviewer for the purely accidental circumstance +that that volume contained no essay on Raphael; and a little later the +writer of a book on the pictures in Rome "had to confess unutterable +boredom" in the presence of the Stanze of the Vatican. + +It is not probable that any critic who greatly valued his reputation, or +who had any serious reputation to value, would take quite this tone; +but, leaving out of consideration the impressionistic and ultra-modern +criticism which ignores Raphael altogether, it is instructive to note +the way in which a critic so steeped in Italian art as Mr. Berenson +approaches the fallen prince. The artist who used to be considered the +greatest of draughtsmen he will hardly admit to be a draughtsman at all, +ranking him far below Pollaiuolo and positively speaking of him as "a +poor creature, most docile and patient." As a colorist and a manipulator +of paint, he places him with Sebastiano del Piombo--that is, among the +mediocrities. Almost the only serious merit, from his point of view, +which he will allow him is a mastery in the rendering of space, shared +in nearly equal measure by Perugino, as, to some extent, by nearly all +the painters of the Umbrian school. For, while he admits that Raphael +was the greatest master of composition that Europe has produced, he +evidently thinks of composition, as do so many other moderns, as a +matter of relatively little importance. + +It is not Raphael's popularity that is in question; that is, perhaps, as +great as ever it was. His works, in one form or another of reproduction, +from the finest carbon print to the cheapest lithograph, are still to be +found, in the humblest homes as in the most splendid, in nearly every +quarter of the globe. That popularity was always based on what Berenson +calls the "illustrative" qualities of Raphael's work, on the beauty of +his women, the majesty of his men; on his ability to tell a story as we +like it told and to picture a world that we wish might be real. One may +not be prepared to consider these illustrative qualities so negligible +as do many modern critics, or to echo Mr. Berenson's phrase about "that +which in art ... is so unimportant as what ... we call beauty." One +might point out that the greatest artists, from Phidias to Rembrandt, +have occupied themselves with illustration, and that to formulate the +ideals of a race and an epoch is no mean task. But, for the moment, we +may neglect all that, our present inquiry being why an artist, once +counted the greatest of all, is no longer considered very significant by +those who measure by purely artistic standards rather than by that of +illustrative success and consequent popularity. + +We may also leave out of our present consideration Raphael's achievement +in the suggestion of space. It is a very real quality and a high one. It +has doubtless always been an important element in the enjoyability of +Raphael's art, as it is almost the only enjoyable element, for many of +us, in the art of Perugino. But it is an element that has only very +recently been clearly perceived to exist. If it was enjoyed by the +artists and critics, from Raphael's day almost to our own, they were +unconscious of the fact, and the probability is that we enjoy it more +than they did. It will not account for the estimation in which they held +Raphael, and still less will it account for the relative lack of +interest in him to-day. + +In truth the reason why many modern critics and painters almost dislike +Raphael is the very reason for which he was so greatly revered. Coming +in the nick of time, at the close of an epoch of investigation, himself +a man of wide culture and quick intellect but of no special originality +or emotional power, he learned from all his predecessors what they had +to teach and, choosing from the elements of their art those which were +suited to his purpose, formed a perfectly balanced and noble style which +was immediately accepted as the only style suitable to the expression of +lofty ideas in monumental form. He became the lawgiver, the founder of +classicism, the formulator of the academic ideal. Not to admire him was +to confess oneself a barbarian, and even those who did not really care +for his art hardly dared to say so. As long as the academic ideal +retained any validity his supremacy endured, and it was only with the +definitive turning of modern art into the paths of romanticism and +naturalism that revolt became possible. + +But when the world became tired of Raphaelism it inevitably became +unjust to Raphael. It forgot that it was not he who had made his art the +test of that of others--who had erected what, with him, was a +spontaneous and original creation into a rigid system of laws. It +confounded him with his followers and imitators, and, being bored by +them, began to find the master himself a bore. + +For, eclectic as he was by nature, and founder as he was of the academic +régime, the "grand style" of Raphael was yet a new and personal +contribution to art. He drew from many sources, but the principle of +combination was his own. His originality was in that mastery of +composition which no one has ever denied him, but which is very +differently rated as a quality of art by different temperaments. Almost +everything specifically Raphaelesque in his work is the offspring of +that power of design in which he is still the unapproached master. +Modern criticism is right in denying that he was a draughtsman, if by +draughtsman is meant one deeply preoccupied with form and structure for +its own sake. His distinction was to invest the human figure with such +forms as should best fit it to play its part in a scheme of monumental +composition. The "style" of his draperies, so much and so justly +admired, is composition of draperies. He was not a colorist as Titian +was a colorist, or a painter as Velazquez was a painter--he was just so +much of a colorist and a painter as is compatible with being the +greatest of decorative designers. Everything in his finest works is +entirely subordinated to the beauty and expressiveness of composition, +and nothing is allowed to have too great an individual interest for its +predestined part in the final result. Probably he could not have drawn +like Michelangelo or painted like Hals--certainly, when he once +understood himself, he would not have desired to do so. + +Even in his early work he showed his gifts as a composer, and some of +the small pictures of his Florentine period are quite perfect in +design. Nothing could be better composed within their restricted field +than the "Madonna del Cardellino" or the "Belle Jardinière." Nearly at +the end of the period he made his greatest failure, the "Entombment" of +the Borghese Gallery. It was his most ambitious effort up to this time +and he wanted to put everything that he had learned into it, to draw +like Michelangelo and to express emotion like Mantegna. He made a host +of studies for it, tried it this way and that, lost all spontaneity and +all grasp of the ensemble. What he finally produced is a thing of +fragments, falling far below his models in the qualities he was +attempting to rival and redeemed by little or nothing of the quality +proper to himself. But, apparently, it answered its purpose. It freed +him from preoccupation with the work of others. When his great +opportunity came to him, in the commission to decorate the Camera della +Segnatura, his painfully acquired knowledge was sufficiently at his +command to give him no further trouble. He could concentrate himself on +the essential part of his problem, the creation of an entirely +appropriate, dignified, and beautiful decorative design. It was the work +for which he was born, and he succeeded so immediately and so admirably +in it that neither he nor any one else has ever been able to fill such +spaces so perfectly again. + +There are fourteen important compositions in the room. The decoration of +the ceiling had already been begun by Sodoma, and Sodoma's decorative +framework Raphael allowed to remain; partly, perhaps, from courtesy, +more probably because its general disposition was admirable and not to +be improved on. If Sodoma had begun any of the larger paintings which +were to fill his frames they were removed to make way for the new work. +There has always been a great deal of discussion as to whether Raphael +himself invented the admirable scheme of subjects by which the room was +made to illustrate the Renaissance ideal of culture with its division +into the four great fields of learning: divinity, philosophy (including +science), poetry, and law. In reality, the question is of little +importance. There seems to be at least one bit of internal evidence, to +be mentioned presently, that even here the artist did not have a +perfectly free hand, as we know he did not later. Whoever thought of the +subjects, it was Raphael who discovered how to treat them in such a way +as to make of this room the most perfectly planned piece of decoration +in the world. Sodoma had left, on the vaulting, four circular medallions +and four rectangular spaces which were to be filled with figure +compositions. In the circles, each directly above one of the great wall +spaces, Raphael placed figures personifying Theology, Philosophy, +Poetry and Justice; in the rectangles he illustrated these subjects with +the stories of "The Fall of Man," "Apollo and Marsyas," and "The +Judgment of Solomon," and with that figure, leaning over a celestial +globe, which must be meant for Science. All of these panels are on +curved surfaces, and Raphael's decorative instinct led him, on this +account and to preserve the supremacy of the great wall spaces below, to +suppress all distance, placing his figures against a background of +simulated gold mosaic and arranging them, virtually, upon one plane. +There is, therefore, no possible question of "space composition" here. +These panels depend for their effect entirely upon composition in two +dimensions--upon the perfect balancing of filled and empty spaces, the +invention of interesting shapes, and the arrangement of beautiful lines. +It is the pattern that counts, and the pattern is perfect. + +The "Poetry" (Pl. 11) is the most beautiful of the medallions, but they +are all much alike: a draped female figure in the middle, seated to give +it scale, large enough to fill the height of the circle amply but +without crowding, and winged _putti_, bearing inscribed tablets, on +either side. There are other ways of filling a circle acceptably, as +Botticelli had shown and as Raphael was to show again in more than one +_tondo_, but for their situation, marking the principal axes of the +room, there is no way so adequate as this. As Mr. Blashfield has said, +speaking from experience: "When a modern painter has a medallion to fill +and has tried one arrangement after another, he inevitably realizes that +it is Raphael who has found the best ordering that could be found; and +the modern painter builds upon his lines, laid down so distinctly that +the greater the practice of the artist the more complete becomes his +realization of Raphael's comprehension of essentials in composition." +Not only so, but the modern painter finds as inevitably that, accepting +this ordering as the best, even then he cannot add another figure to +these four. He may, perhaps, draw it better in detail or give more +character to the head, but he cannot capture that felicity of spacing, +that absoluteness of balance, that variety and vivacity combined with +monumental repose. The more his nature and training have made him a +designer the more certainly he feels, before that single medallion of +Poetry, that he is in the presence of the inimitable master of design. + +[Illustration: Plate 11.--Raphael. "Poetry." +In the Vatican.] + +If the composition of the rectangles is less inevitable it is only +because the variety of ways in which such simple rectangles may be +filled is almost infinite. Composition more masterly than that of the +"Judgment of Solomon" (Pl. 12), for instance, you will find nowhere; so +much is told in a restricted space, yet with no confusion, the space is +so admirably filled and its shape so marked by the very lines that +enrich and relieve it. It is as if the design had determined the space +rather than the space the design. If you had a tracing of the figures in +the midst of an immensity of white paper you could not bound them by any +other line than that of the actual frame. One of the most remarkable +things about it is the way in which the angles, which artists usually +avoid and disguise, are here sharply accented. A great part of the +dignity and importance given to the king is due to the fact that his +head fills one of these angles, and the opposite one contains the hand +of the executioner and the foot by which the living child is held aloft, +and to this point the longest lines of the picture lead. The dead +child and the indifferent mother fill the lower corners. In the middle, +herself only half seen and occupying little space, is the true mother, +and it seems that her explosive energy, as she rushes to the rescue of +her child, has forced all these other figures back to the confines of +the picture. Compare this restless yet subtly balanced composition, full +of oblique lines and violent movement, with the gracious, placid +formality of the "Adam and Eve," and you will have some notion of the +meaning of this gift of design. + +[Illustration: Plate 12.--Raphael. "The Judgment of Solomon." +In the Vatican.] + +But it is the frescoes on the four walls of this room which are +Raphael's greatest triumphs--the most perfect pieces of monumental +decoration in the world. On the two longer walls, nearly unbroken +lunettes of something over a semicircle, he painted the two great +compositions of Theology and Philosophy known as the "Disputa" and the +"School of Athens." The "Disputa" (Pl. 13), the earlier of the two, has +the more connection with the art of the past. The use of gilded relief +in the upper part recalls the methods of Pintoricchio, and the hint of +the whole arrangement was doubtless taken from those semidomes which +existed in many churches. But what an original idea it was to transform +the flat wall of a room into the apse of a cathedral, and what a +solemnity it imparts to the discussion that is going on! The upper part +is formal in the extreme, as it need be for the treatment of such a +theme, but even here there is variety as well as stateliness in the +attitudes and the spacing. In the lower part the variety becomes almost +infinite, yet there is never a jar--not a line or a fold of drapery that +mars the supreme order of the whole. Besides the uncounted cherubs which +float among the rays of glory or support the cloudy thrones of the +saints and prophets, there are between seventy and eighty figures in +the picture; yet the hosts of heaven and the church on earth seem +gathered about the altar with its sacred wafer--the tiny circle which is +the focus of the great composition and the inevitable goal of all +regards, as it is the central mystery of Catholic dogma. + +[Illustration: Plate 13.--Raphael. The "Disputa." +In the Vatican.] + +Opposite, in the "School of Athens" (Pl. 14), the treatment is different +but equally successful. The hieratic majesty of the "Disputa" was here +unnecessary, but a tranquil and spacious dignity was to be attained, and +it is attained through the use of vertical and horizontal lines--the +lines of stability and repose, while the bounding curve is echoed again +and again in the diminishing arches of the imagined vaulting. The +figures, fewer in number than in the "Disputa" and confined to the lower +half of the composition, are ranged in two long lines across the +picture; but the nearer line is broken in the centre and the two +figures on the steps, serving as connecting-links between the two ranks, +give to the whole something of that semicircular grouping so noticeable +in the companion picture. The bas-reliefs upon the architecture and the +great statues of Apollo and Minerva above them draw the eye upward at +the sides, and this movement is intensified by the arrangement of the +lateral groups of figures. By these means the counter curve to the arch +above, the one fixed necessity, apparently, of the lunette, is +established. It is more evident in the perspective curve of the painted +dome. Cover this line with a bit of paper, or substitute for it a +straight lintel like that seen beyond, and you will be surprised to find +how much of the beauty of the picture has disappeared. The grouping of +the figures themselves, the way they are played about into clumps or +separated to give greater importance, by isolation, to a particular +head, is even more beyond praise than in the "Disputa." The whole design +has but one fault, and that is an afterthought. In the cartoon the +disproportioned bulk of Heraclitus, thrust into the foreground and +writing in an impossible attitude on a desk in impossible perspective, +is not to be found. It is such a blot upon the picture that one cannot +believe that Raphael added it of his own motion; rather it must have +been placed there at the dictation of some meddling cardinal or learned +humanist who, knowing nothing of art, could not see why any vacant space +should not be filled with any figure whose presence seemed to him +historically desirable. One is tempted to suspect even, so clumsy is the +figure and so out of scale with its neighbors, that the master refused +to disfigure his work himself and left the task to one of his +apprentices. If it had been done by one of them, say Giulio Romano, +after the picture was entirely completed and at the time of the +"Incendio del' Borgo," it could not be more out of keeping. + +[Illustration: Plate 14.--Raphael. "The School of Athens." +In the Vatican.] + +Each of these walls has a doorway at one end, and the way in which these +openings are dissimulated and utilized is most ingenious, particularly +in the "Disputa," where the bits of parapet which play an important part +at either side of the composition, one pierced, the other solid, were +suggested solely by the presence of this door. In the end walls the +openings, large windows much higher than the doors, become of such +importance that the whole nature of the problem is changed. It is the +pierced lunette that is to be dealt with, and Raphael has dealt with it +in two entirely different ways. One wall is symmetrical, the window in +the middle, and on that wall he painted the "Parnassus" (Pl. 15), Apollo +and the Muses in the centre with groups of poets a little lower on +either side and other groups filling the spaces to right and left of the +window head. At first sight the design seems less symmetrical and formal +than the others, with a lyrical freedom befitting the subject, but in +reality it is no less perfect in its ponderation. The group of trees +above Apollo and the reclining figures either side of him accent the +centrality of his position. From this point the line of heads rises in +either direction to the figures of Homer and of the Muse whose back is +turned to the spectator, and the perpendicularity of these two figures +carries upward into the arch the vertical lines of the window. From this +point the lateral masses of foliage take up the drooping curve and unite +it to the arch, and this curve is strongly reinforced by the building up +toward either side of the foreground groups and by the disposition of +the arms of Sappho and of the poets immediately behind her, while, to +disguise its formality, it is contradicted by the long line of Sappho's +body, which echoes that of the bearded poet immediately to the right of +the window and gives a sweep to the left to the whole lower part of the +composition. It is the immediate and absolute solution of the problem, +and so small a thing as the scarf of the back-turned Muse plays its +necessary part in it, balancing, as it does, the arm of the Muse who +stands highest on the left and establishing one of a number of +subsidiary garlands that play through and bind together the wonderful +design. + +[Illustration: Plate 15.--Raphael. "Parnassus." +In the Vatican.] + +The window in the opposite wall is to one side of the middle, and here +Raphael meets the new problem with a new solution. He places a separate +picture in each of the unequal rectangles, carries a simulated cornice +across at the level of the window head, and paints, in the segmental +lunette thus left, the so-called "Jurisprudence" (Pl. 16), which +seems to many decorators the most perfect piece of decorative design +that even Raphael ever created--the most perfect piece of design, +therefore, in the world. Its subtlety of spacing, its exquisiteness of +line, its monumental simplicity, rippled through with a melody of +falling curves from end to end, are beyond description--the reader must +study them for himself in the illustration. One thing he might miss were +not his attention called to it--the ingenious way in which the whole +composition is adjusted to a diagonal axis that the asymmetry of the +wall may be minimized. Draw an imaginary straight line from the boss in +the soffit of the arch through the middle of the Janus-head of Prudence. +It will accurately bisect the central group, composed of this figure and +her two attendant genii, will pass through her elevated left knee, the +centre of a system of curves, and the other end of it will strike the +top of the post or mullion that divides the window opening into two +parts. + +[Illustration: Plate 16.--Raphael. "Jurisprudence." +In the Vatican.] + +This single room, the Camera della Segnatura, marks the brief blossoming +time of Raphael's art, an art consummate in science yet full of a +freshness and spontaneity--the dew still upon it--as wonderful as its +learning. The master himself could not duplicate it. He tried for +Venetian warmth of color in the "Mass of Bolsena" (Pl. 17) and +experimented with tricks of illumination in the "Deliverance of Peter" +(Pl. 18), and in these two compositions, struck out new and admirable +ways of filling pierced lunettes. The balancing, in the one, of the +solitary figure of the pope against the compact group of seven +figures--a group that has to be carried up above the curved screen in +order to counteract the importance given to Julius by his isolation and +by the greater mass of his supporting group below--is a triumph of +arrangement; and here, again, it is notable that the bleeding wafer, the +necessary centre of interest, is situated on a straight line drawn +diagonally from the keystone of the arch to the centre of the window +head, and almost exactly half-way between these two points, while the +great curve of the screen leads to it from either side. In the +symmetrically pierced lunette opposite, the distribution of the space +into three distinct but united pictures, the central one seen through +the grating of the prison, is a highly ingenious and, on the whole, an +acceptable variant on previous inventions. But these two are the last of +the Vatican frescoes that show Raphael's infallible instinct as a +composer. He grows tired, exaggerates his mannerisms, gives a greater +and greater share of the work to his pupils. The later Stanze are either +pompous or confused, or both, until we reach the higgledy-piggledy of +the "Burning of the Borgo" or that inextricable tangle, suggestive of +nothing so much as of a dish of macaroni, the "Battle of Constantine," a +picture painted after the master's death, but for which he probably left +something in the way of sketches. + +[Illustration: Plate 17.--Raphael. "The Mass of Bolsena." +In the Vatican.] + +Yet even in what seems this decadence of his talent Raphael only needed +a new problem to revive his admirable powers in their full splendor. In +1514 he painted the "Sibyls" (Pl. 19) of Santa Maria della Pace, in a +frieze-shaped panel cut by a semicircular arch, and the new shape given +him to fill inspired a composition as perfect in itself and as +indisputably the only right one for the place as anything he ever did. +Among his latest works were the pendentives of the Farnesina, with the +story of Cupid and Psyche--works painted and even drawn by his pupils, +coarse in types and heavy in color but altogether astonishing in freedom +and variety of design. The earlier painters covered their vaulting +with ornamental patterns in which spaces were reserved for independent +pictures, like the rectangles of the Stanza della Segnatura. It was a +bold innovation when Michelangelo discarded this system and placed in +the pendentives of the Sistine his colossal figures of the Prophets and +the Sibyls, each on its architectural throne. It was reserved for +Raphael to take a step that no earlier painter could have dreamed of and +to fill these triangular spaces with free groups relieved against a +clear sky which is the continuous background of the whole series. One +may easily think the earlier system more architecturally fitting, but +the skill with which these groups are composed, their perfect +naturalness, their exhaustless variety, the perfection with which they +fill these awkward shapes, as it were inevitably and without effort, is +nothing short of amazing. It is decoration of a festal and informal +order--the decoration of a kind of summer house, fitted for pleasure, +rather than of a stately chamber--but it is decoration the most +consummate, the fitting last word of the greatest master of decorative +design that the world has seen. + +[Illustration: Plate 18.--Raphael. "The Deliverance of Peter." +In the Vatican.] + +It is this master designer that is the real Raphael, and, but for the +element of design always present in the least of his works, the charming +illustrator, the mere "painter of Madonnas," might be allowed to sink +comfortably into artistic oblivion without cause for protest. But there +is another Raphael we could spare less easily, Raphael the +portrait-painter. The great decorators have nearly always been great +portrait-painters as well, although--perhaps because--there is little +resemblance between the manner of feeling and working necessary for +success in the two arts. The decorator, constantly occupied with +relations of line and space which have little to do with imitation, +finds in the submissive attention to external fact necessary to success +in portraiture a source of refreshment and of that renewed contact with +nature which is constantly necessary to art if it is not to become too +arid an abstraction. Certainly it was so with Raphael, and the master of +design has left us a series of portraits comparable only to those of +that other great designer whose fate was to leave little but portraits +behind him, Hans Holbein. Allowing for the necessary variation of type +and costume in their models and for the difference between an Italian +and a northern education, their methods are singularly alike. Raphael +has greater elegance and feeling for style, Holbein a richer color sense +and, above all, a finer craftsmanship, an unapproachable material +perfection. They have the same quiet, intense observation, the same +impeccable accuracy, the same preoccupation with the person before them +and with nothing else--an individuality to be presented with all it +contains, neither more nor less--to be rendered entirely, and without +flattery as without caricature. There have been portrait-painters who +were greater painters, in the more limited sense of the word, than these +two, and there has been at least one painter whose imaginative sympathy +gave an inner life to his portraits absent from theirs, but in the +essential qualities of portraiture, as distinguished from all other +forms of art, perhaps no one else has quite equalled them. One can give +no greater praise to the "Castiglione" or the "Donna Velata" than to say +that they are fit to hang beside the "Georg Gyze" or the "Christina of +Milan"; and at least one portrait by Raphael, the "Tommaso Inghirami," +in the collection of Mrs. Gardner (Pl. 20)--the original of which the +picture in the Pitti Palace is a replica--has a beauty of surface and +of workmanship almost worthy of Holbein himself. + +[Illustration: Plate 19.--Raphael. "The Sibyls." +Santa Maria della Pace, Rome.] + +[Illustration: Plate 20.--Raphael. "Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami." +In the collection of Mrs. Gardner.] + +Raphael's portraits alone, had he done nothing else, would justify a +great reputation, but they form so relatively small a part of his work +that they may almost be neglected in examining his claims to the rank +that used to be assigned him among the world's greatest artists. It is, +after all, his unique mastery of composition that is his chief title to +fame, and his glory must always be in proportion to the estimation in +which that quality is held. It was because composition was to him a +comparatively unimportant part of painting that Velazquez thought little +of Raphael. It is because, for them, composition, as a distinct element +of art, has almost ceased to exist that so many modern painters and +critics decry Raphael altogether. The decorators have always known that +design is the essence of their art, and therefore they have always +appreciated the greatest of designers. That is why Paul Baudry, in the +third quarter of the nineteenth century, idolized Raphael and based his +own art upon that of the great Umbrian. To-day, in our own country, +mural decoration is again becoming a living art, and the desire for the +appropriate decoration of important buildings with monumental works of +painting is more wide-spread, perhaps, than it has been anywhere at any +time since the Italian Renaissance. So surely as the interest in +decorative painting and the knowledge of its true principles become more +widely spread, so surely will the name of Raphael begin to shine again +with something of its ancient splendor. + +But design is something more than the essential quality of mural +decoration--it is the common basis of all the arts, the essential thing +in art itself. Each of the arts has its qualities proper to it alone, +and it may be right to estimate the painter, the sculptor, the +architect, or the musician according to his eminence in those qualities +which are distinctive of his particular art and which separate it most +sharply from the other arts. In that sense we are right to call Frans +Hals a greater painter than Raphael. But if we estimate a man's artistry +by the same standard, whatever the form of art in which it expresses +itself, rating him by his power of co-ordinating and composing notes or +forms or colors into a harmonious and beautiful unity, then must we +place Raphael pretty near where he used to be placed, admitting but a +choice few of the very greatest to any equality with him. If we no +longer call him "the prince of painters" we must call him one of the +greatest artists among those who have practised the art of painting. + + + + + +V + +TWO WAYS OF PAINTING + + +Among the modern paintings in the Metropolitan Museum is a brilliant and +altogether remarkable little picture by John Sargent, entitled "The +Hermit" (Pl. 21). Mr. Sargent is a portrait-painter by vocation, and the +public knows him best as a penetrating and sometimes cruel reader of +human character. He is a mural painter by avocation and capable, on +occasion, of a monumental formality. In this picture, as in the +wonderful collection of watercolors in the Brooklyn Institute of Arts +and Sciences, one fancies one sees the essential John Sargent, working +for himself alone without regard to external demands, and doing what he +really cares most to do. In such work he is a modern of the moderns +and, in the broadest sense of the word, a thorough Impressionist. Not +that he shows himself a disciple of Monet or occupies himself with the +broken touch or the division of tones--his method is as direct as that +of Sorolla and his impressionism is of the same kind--a bending of all +his energies to the vivid realization of the effect of the scene +rendered as one might perceive it in the first flash of vision if one +came upon it unexpectedly. This picture is better than Sorolla--it is +better than almost any one. It is perhaps the most astonishing +realization of the modern ideal, the most accomplished transcript of the +actual appearance of nature, that has yet been produced. It is because +of its great merit, because of its extraordinary success in what it +attempts, that it leads one to the serious consideration of the nature +of the attempt and of the gain and loss involved in the choice that +modern art has made. + +The picture is exactly square--the choice of this form is, of itself, +typically modern in its unexpectedness--and represents a bit of rough +wood interior under intense sunlight. The light is studied for its +brilliancy rather than for its warmth, and if the picture has a fault, +granted the point of view of the painter, it is in a certain coldness of +color; but such conditions of glaring and almost colorless light do +exist in nature. One sees a few straight trunks of some kind of pine or +larch, a network of branches and needles, a tumble of moss-spotted and +lichened rocks, a confusion of floating lights and shadows, and that is +all. The conviction of truth is instantaneous--it is an actual bit of +nature, just as the painter found it. One is there on that ragged +hillside, half dazzled by the moving spots of light, as if set down +there suddenly, with no time to adjust one's vision. Gradually one's +eyes clear and one is aware, first of a haggard human head with tangled +beard and unkempt hair, then of an emaciated body. There is a man in the +wood! And then--did they betray themselves by some slight +movement?--there are a couple of slender antelopes who were but now +invisible and who melt into their surroundings again at the slightest +inattention. It is like a pictorial demonstration of protective coloring +in men and animals. + +[Illustration: Plate 21.--Sargent. "The Hermit." +In the Metropolitan Museum of Art.] + +Now, almost any one can see how superbly all this is rendered. Any one +can marvel at and admire the free and instantaneous handling, the web of +slashing and apparently meaningless brush strokes which, at a given +distance, take their places by a kind of magic and _are_ the things they +represent. But it takes a painter to know how justly it is observed. In +these days no painter, whatever may be his deepest convictions, can +escape the occasional desire to be modern; and most of us have +attempted, at one time or another, the actual study of the human figure +in the open air. We have taken our model into a walled garden or a deep +wood or the rocky ravine of a brook and have set ourselves seriously to +find out what a naked man or woman really looks like in the setting of +outdoor nature. And we have found just what Sargent has painted. The +human figure, as a figure, has ceased to exist. Line and structure and +all that we have most cared for have disappeared. Even the color of +flesh has ceased to count, and the most radiant blond skin of the +fairest woman has become an insignificant pinkish spot no more important +than a stone and not half so important as a flower. Humanity is absorbed +into the landscape. + +Obviously, there are two courses open to the painter. If he is a modern +by feeling and by training, full of curiosity and of the scientific +temper, caring more for the investigation of the aspects of nature and +the rendering of natural light and atmosphere than for the telling of a +story or the construction of a decoration, he will, if he is able +enough, treat his matter much as Sargent has treated it. The figure will +become, for him, only an incident in the landscape. It will be important +only as a thing of another texture and another color, valuable for the +different way in which it receives the light and reflects the sky, just +as rocks and foliage and water and bare earth are valuable. For to the +true Impressionist light and atmosphere are the only realities, and +objects exist only to provide surfaces for the play of light and +atmosphere. He will abandon all attempt at rendering the material and +physical significance of the human form and will still less concern +himself with its spiritual significance. He will gain a great vividness +of illusion, and he may console himself for what he loses with the +reflection that he has expressed the true relation of man to the +universe--that he has expressed either man's insignificance or man's +oneness with nature, according as his temper is pessimistic or +optimistic. + +If, on the other hand, the painter is one to whom the figure as a figure +means much; one to whom line and bulk and modelling are the principal +means of expression, and who cares for the structure and stress of bone +and muscle; if the glow and softness of flesh appeal strongly to him; +above all, if he has the human point of view and thinks of his figures +as people engaged in certain actions, having certain characters, +experiencing certain states of mind and body; then he will give up the +struggle with the truths of aspect that seem so vital to the painter of +the other type and, by a frank use of conventions, will seek to +increase the importance of his figure at the expense of its +surroundings. He will give it firmer lines and clearer edges, will +strengthen its light and shade, will dwell upon its structure or its +movement and expression. He will so compose his landscape as to +subordinate it to his figure and will make its lines echo and accentuate +that figure's action or repose. When he has accomplished his task he +will have painted not man insignificant before nature but man dominating +nature. + +For an example of this way of representing man's relation to the world +about him, let us take Titian's "Saint Jerome" (Pl. 22)--a picture +somewhat similar to Sargent's in subject and in the relative size of the +figure and its surroundings. Titian has here given more importance to +the landscape than was common in his day. He also has meant, as Sargent +has, to make a great deal of the wilderness to which his saint has +retired, and to make his saint a lonely human being in a savage place. +But the saint and his emotion is, after all, what interests Titian most, +and the wildness of nature is valuable to him mainly for its sympathy +with this emotion. He wants to give a single powerful feeling and to +give it with the utmost dramatic force--to give it theatrically even, +one might admit of this particular picture; for it is by no means so +favorable an example of Titian's method, or of the older methods of art +in general, as is Sargent's "Hermit" of the modern way of seeing and +painting. To attain this end he simplifies and arranges everything. He +lowers the pitch of his coloring to a sombre glow and concentrates the +little light upon his kneeling figure. He spends all his knowledge on so +drawing and modelling that figure as to make you feel to the utmost its +bulk and reality and the strain upon its muscles and tendons, and he +so places everything else on his canvas as to intensify its action and +expression. The gaze of the saint is fixed upon a crucifix high on the +right of the picture, and the book behind him, the lines of the rocks, +the masses of the foliage, even the general formation of the ground, are +so disposed as to echo and reinforce the great diagonal. There is a +splendid energy of invention in the drawing of the tree stems, but the +effect is clear and simple with nothing of Sargent's dazzle and +confusion. As for the lion, he is a mere necessary mark of +identification, and Titian has taken no interest in him. + +[Illustration: Plate 22.--Titian. "St. Jerome in the Desert." +In the Brera Gallery, Milan.] + +Now, it is evident that there is not nearly so much literal truth to the +appearance of nature in this picture as in Sargent's. It is not only +that it would never have occurred to Titian to try to paint the +glittering spottiness of sunlight splashing through leafage, or to +attempt to raise his key of light to something like that of nature, at +the cost of fulness of color. It is not merely that he translates and +simplifies and neglects certain truths that the world had not yet +learned to see. He deliberately and intentionally falsifies. He knew as +well as we do that a natural landscape would not arrange itself in such +lines and masses for the purpose of throwing out the figure and of +enhancing its emotion. But to him natural facts were but so much +material, to be treated as he pleased for the carrying out of his +purpose. He was a colorist and a chiaroscurist; and he had a great deal +more interest in light and in landscape than most of the painters of his +time. If he had been pre-eminently a draughtsman, like Michelangelo, he +would have reduced his light and shade to the amount strictly necessary +to give that powerful modelling of the figure which is the draughtsman's +means of expression, would have greatly increased the relative size and +importance of the figure, and would have reduced the landscape to a +barely intelligible symbol. Had he been a linealist, like Botticelli, he +would have eliminated modelling almost altogether, would have +concentrated his attention upon the edges of things, and would have +reduced his picture to a flat pattern in which the beauty and +expressiveness of the lines should be almost the only attraction. + +For all art is an exchange of gain against loss--you cannot have +Sargent's truth of impression and Titian's truth of emotion in the same +picture, nor Michelangelo's beauty of structure with Botticelli's beauty +of line. To be a successful artist is to know what you want and to get +it at any necessary sacrifice, though the greatest artists maintain a +noble balance and sacrifice no more than is necessary. And if a painter +of to-day is like-minded with these older masters he will have to +express himself much in their manner. He will have to make, with his +eyes open, the sacrifices which they made, more or less unconsciously, +and to deny a whole range of truths with which his fellows are occupied +that he may express clearly and forcibly the few truths which he has +chosen. + +All truths are good, and all ways of painting are legitimate that are +necessary to the expression of any truth. I am not here concerned to +show that one way is better than another or one set of truths more +important than another set of truths. For the present I am desirous only +of showing why there is more than one way--of explaining the necessity +of different methods for the expression of different individualities and +different ways of envisaging nature and art. But a little while ago it +was the modern or impressionistic manner that needed explanation. It +was new, it was revolutionary, and it was misunderstood and disliked. A +generation of critics has been busy in explaining it, a generation of +artists has been busy in practising it, and now the balance has turned +the other way. The pressure of conformity is upon the other side, and it +is the older methods that need justification and explanation. The +prejudices of the workers and the writers have gradually and naturally +become the prejudices of at least a part of the public, and it has +become necessary to show that the small minority of artists who still +follow the old roads do so not from ignorance or stupidity or a stolid +conservatism, still less from mere wilful caprice, but from necessity, +because those roads are the only ones that can lead them where they wish +to go. No more magnificent demonstration of the qualities possible to +the purely modern methods of painting has been made than this brilliant +little picture of Sargent's. All the more is it a demonstration of the +qualities impossible to these methods. If such qualities have any +permanent value and interest for the modern world it is a gain for art +that some painters should try to keep alive the methods that render +possible their attainment. + + + + + +VI + +THE AMERICAN SCHOOL + + +In the catalogues of our museums you may find entries like this: "John +Smith, American school; The Empty Jug" or what-not. In such entries +little more than a bare statement of nationality is intended. John Smith +is an American, by birth or adoption; that is all that the statement is +meant to convey. But the question occurs: Have we an American school in +a more specific sense than this? Have we a body of painters with certain +traits in common and certain differences from the painters of other +countries? Has our production in painting sufficient homogeneity and +sufficient national and local accent to entitle it to the name of +American school in the sense in which there is, undoubtedly, a French +school and an English school? + +Under the conditions of to-day there are no longer anywhere such +distinctive local schools as existed in the Renaissance. In Italy, in +those days, there were not only such great schools as the Venetian, the +Florentine, and the Umbrian, differing widely in their point of view, +their manner of seeing, and their technical traditions--each little town +had a school with something characteristic that separated its painters +from those of other schools in the surrounding towns. To-day every one +knows and is influenced by the work of every one else, and it is only +broad national characteristics that still subsist. Modern pictures are +singularly alike, but, on the whole, it is still possible to tell an +English picture from a French one, and a German or Italian picture from +either. We may still speak of a Dutch school or a Spanish school with +some reasonableness. Is it similarly and equally reasonable to speak of +an American school? Does a room full of American pictures have a +different look from a room full of pictures by artists of any other +nationality? Does one feel that the pictures in such a room have a +something in common that makes them kin and a something different that +distinguishes them from the pictures of all other countries? I think the +answer must be in the affirmative. + +We have already passed the stage of mere apprenticeship, and it can no +longer be said that our American painters are mere reflections of their +European masters. Twenty or even ten years ago there may have been some +truth in the accusation. To-day many of our younger painters have had no +foreign training at all, or have had such as has left no specific mark of a +particular master; and from the work of most of our older painters it would +be difficult to guess who their masters were without reference to a +catalogue. They have, through long work in America and under American +conditions, developed styles of their own bearing no discoverable +resemblance to the styles of their first instructors. To take specific +examples, who would imagine from the mural paintings of Blashfield or the +decorations by Mowbray in the University Club of New York that either had +been a pupil of Bonnat? Or who, looking at the exquisite landscapes or +delicate figure pieces of Weir, would find anything to recall the name of +Gérôme? Some of the pupils of Carolus Duran are almost the only painters we +have who acquired in their school-days a distinctive method of work which +still marks their production, and even they are hardly distinguishable +to-day from others; for the method of Duran, as modified and exemplified by +John Sargent, has become the method of all the world, and a pupil of Carolus +simply paints in the modern manner, like the rest. Those American painters +who have adopted the impressionist point of view, again, have modified its +technic to suit their own purposes and are at least as different from the +Impressionists of France as are the Impressionists of Scandinavia. We have +painters who are undeniably influenced by Whistler, but so have other +countries--the school of Whistler is international--and, after all, Whistler +was an American. In short, the resemblances between American painting and +the painting of other countries are to-day no greater than the resemblances +between the painting of any two of those countries. And I think the +differences between American painting and that of other countries are quite +as great as, if not greater than, the differences between the paintings of +any two of those countries. + +Another accusation that used to be heard against our painters has been +out-lived. We used to be told, with some truth, that we had learned to +paint but had nothing to say with our painting, that we produced +admirable studies but no pictures. The accusation never was true of our +landscape-painting. Whatever may be the final estimation of the works of +Inness and Wyant, there can be no doubt that they produced +pictures--things conceived and worked out to give one definite and +complete impression; things in which what was presented and what was +eliminated were equally determined by a definite purpose; things in +which accident and the immediate dominance of nature had little or no +part. As for Winslow Homer, whether in landscape or figure painting, his +work was unfailingly pictorial, whatever else it might be. He was a +great and original designer, and every canvas of his was completely and +definitely composed--a quality which at once removes from the category +of mere sketches and studies even his slighter and more rapid +productions. And our landscape-painters of to-day are equally painters +of pictures. Some of them might be thought, by a modern taste, too +conventionally painters of pictures--too much occupied with composition +and tone and other pictorial qualities at the expense of freshness of +observation--while our briskest and most original observers have, many +of them, a power of design and a manner of casting even their freshest +observations into pictorial form that is as admirable as it is +remarkable. + +No one could enter one of our exhibitions without feeling the definitely +pictorial quality of American landscape-painting, but these exhibitions +do less justice to the achievement of our figure-painters. The principal +reason for this is that many of our most serious figure-painters have +been so much occupied with mural decoration that their work seldom +appears in the exhibitions at all, while the work that they have done is +so scattered over our vast country that we rather forget its existence +and, assuredly, have little realization of its amount. It is one of the +defects of our exhibition system that work of this kind, while it is, of +course, on permanent exhibition in the place for which it is painted, is +hardly ever "exhibited," in the ordinary sense, in the centres where it +is produced. The regular visitor to the Paris salons might know almost +all that has been done in France in the way of mural painting. The +public of our American exhibitions knows only vaguely and by hearsay +what our mural painters have done and are doing. It is true that such +work is infinitely better seen in place, but it is a pity it cannot be +seen, even imperfectly, by the people who attend our exhibitions--people +who can rarely have the necessary knowledge to read such collections of +sketches, studies, and photographs as are shown at the exhibitions of +the Architectural League, where, alone, our mural painters can show +anything. If it were seen it would surely alter the estimation in which +American figure-painting is held. Such work as was done by the late John +La Farge, such work as is being done by Blashfield and Mowbray and +Simmons and a dozen others, if not, in the most limited sense of the +word, pictorial, is even further removed from the mere sketch or +study--the mere bit of good painting--than is the finest easel picture. + +But it is not only in mural decoration that serious figure-painting is +being done in this country. I do not see how any one can deny the name +of pictures to the genre paintings of Mr. Tarbell and Mr. Paxton unless +he is prepared to deny pictorial quality to the whole Dutch school of +the seventeenth century; and the example of these men is influencing a +number of others toward the production of thoroughly thought-out and +executed genre pictures. We have long had such serious figure-painters +as Thayer and Brush, Dewing and Weir. The late Louis Loeb was attempting +figure subjects of a very elaborate sort. To-day every exhibition shows +an increasing number of worthy efforts at figure-painting in either the +naturalistic or the ideal vein. We have pictures with subjects +intelligently chosen and intelligibly treated, pictures with a pattern +and a clear arrangement of line and mass, pictures soundly drawn and +harmoniously colored as well as admirably painted. + +The painters of America are no longer followers of foreign masters or +students learning technic and indifferent to anything else. They are a +school producing work differing in character from that of other schools +and at least equal in quality to that of any school existing to-day. + +If so much may be taken as proved, the question remains for +consideration: What are the characteristics of the American school of +painting? Its most striking characteristic is one that may be considered +a fault or a virtue according to the point of view and the +prepossessions of the observer. It is a characteristic that has +certainly been a cause of the relatively small success of American work +at recent international exhibitions. The American school is, among the +schools of to-day, singularly old-fashioned. This characteristic has, +undoubtedly, puzzled and repelled the foreigner. It is a time when the +madness for novelty seems to be carrying everything before it, when +anything may be accepted so long as it is or seems new, when the effort +of all artists is to get rid of conventions and to shake off the +"shackles of tradition." Here is a new people in the blessed state of +having no traditions to shake off and from whom, therefore, some peppery +wildness might be expected for the tickling of jaded palates. Behold, +they are sturdily setting themselves to recover for art the things the +others have thrown away! They are trying to revive the old fashion of +thoughtful composition, the old fashion of good drawing, the old fashion +of lovely color, and the old fashion of sound and beautiful workmanship. + +This conservatism of American painting, however, is not of the kind that +still marks so much of the painting of England. Excepting exceptions, +English painting is somewhat stolidly staying where it was. America's +conservatism is ardent, determined, living. It is not standing still; +it is going somewhere as rapidly as possible--it might, perhaps, be more +truly called not conservatism but reaction. We have, of course, our +ultramodernists, but their audacities are mild compared to those of the +French or German models they imitate. We have, even more of course, the +followers of the easiest way--the practitioners of current and accepted +methods who are alike everywhere. But our most original and most +distinguished painters, those who give the tone to our exhibitions and +the national accent to our school, are almost all engaged in trying to +get back one or another of the qualities that marked the great art of +the past. They have gone back of the art of the day and are retying the +knots that should bind together the art of all ages. + +This tendency shows itself strongly even in those whose work seems, at +first sight, most purely naturalistic or impressionistic. Among those +of our painters who have adopted and retained the impressionist technic, +with its hatching of broken colors, the two most notable are Mr. Hassam +and Mr. Weir. But Mr. Hassam, at his best, is a designer with a sense of +balance and of classic grace almost equal to that of Corot, and he often +uses the impressionist method to express otherwise the delicate shimmer +of thin foliage that Corot loved. Nay, so little is he a pure +naturalist, he cannot resist letting the white sides of naked nymphs +gleam among his tree trunks--he cannot refrain from the artist's +immemorial dream of Arcady. As for Mr. Weir, surely nothing could be +more unlike the instantaneousness of true impressionism than his +long-brooded-over, subtle-toned, infinitely sensitive art. + +There is little dreaminess in the work of Mr. Tarbell and the growing +number of his followers. Theirs is almost a pure naturalism, a "making +it like." Yet, notably in the work of Mr. Tarbell himself, and to some +extent in that of the others, there is an elegance of arrangement, a +thoroughness in the notation of gradations of light, a beauty and a +charm that were learned of no modern. Their art is an effort to bring +back the artistic quality of the most artistic naturalism ever +practised, that of Vermeer of Delft. + +Others of our artists are going still further back in the history of art +for a part of their inspiration. Mr. Brush has always been a linealist +and a student of form, but his earlier canvases, admirable as they were, +were those of a docile pupil of Gérôme applying the thoroughness of +Gérôme's method to a new range of subjects and painting the American +Indian as Gérôme had painted the modern Egyptian. In recent years each +new picture of his has shown more clearly the influence of the early +Italians--each has been more nearly a symphony of pure line. + +Even in purely technical matters our painters have been experimenting +backward, trying to recover lost technical beauties. The last pictures +of Louis Loeb were underpainted throughout in monochrome, the final +colors being applied in glazes and rubbings, and to-day a number of +others, landscape and figure painters, are attempting to restore and +master this, the pure Venetian method, while still others, among them +Emil Carlsen, are reviving the use of tempera. + +But it is in our mural painting even more than elsewhere that the +conservative or reactionary tendency of American painting is most +clearly marked. John La Farge was always himself, but when the general +movement in mural painting began in this country with the Chicago +World's Fair and the subsequent decoration of the Library of Congress, +the rest of us were much under the influence of Puvis de Chavannes. Even +then the design was not his, but was founded on earlier examples of +decorative composition, but his pale tones were everywhere. Little by +little the study of the past has taught us better. American mural +painting has grown steadily more monumental in design, and at the same +time it has grown richer and fuller in color. To-day, while it is not +less but more personal and original than it was, it has more kinship +with the noble achievements of Raphael and Veronese than has any other +modern work extant. + +And this brings us to the second characteristic of the American school +of painting: it is rapidly becoming a school of color. We have still +plenty of painters who work in the blackish or chalky or muddy and +opaque tones of modern art, but I think we have more men who produce +rich and powerful color and more men who produce subtle and delicate +color than any other modern school. The experiments in reviving old +technical methods have been undertaken for the sake of purity and +luminosity of color and have largely succeeded. The pictures of Mr. +Tarbell are far more colored than those of the European painter whose +work is, in some ways, most analogous to his, M. Joseph Bail. Mr. +Hassam's color is always sparkling and brilliant, Mr. Dewing's delicate +and charming, Mr. Weir's subtle and harmonious and sometimes very full. +Even Mr. Brush's linear arrangements are clothed in sombre but often +richly harmonious tones, and the decorative use of powerful color is the +main reliance of such painters as Hugo Ballin. But the note of color +runs through the school and one hardly needs to name individual men. +Whether our landscapists glaze and scumble with the tonalists, or use +some modification of the impressionist hatching, it is for the sake of +color; and even our most forthright and dashing wielders of the big +brush often achieve a surprising power of resonant coloring. + +Power, fulness, and beauty of coloring are hardly modern qualities. Much +as impressionism has been praised for restoring color to a colorless +art, its result has been, too often, to substitute whitishness for +blackishness. Color has characterized no modern painting since that of +Delacroix and Millet as it characterizes much of the best American +painting. The love for and the success in color of our school is, after +all, a part of its conservatism. + +It may seem an odd way of praising a modern school to call it the least +modern of any. It _would_ be an odd way of praising that school if its +lack of modernness were a mere matter of lagging behind or of standing +still and marking time. But if the "march of progress" has been +down-hill--if the path that is trod leads into a swamp or over a +precipice--then there may be most hopefulness for those who can 'bout +face and march the other way. I have, elsewhere in this volume, given at +some length some of my reasons for thinking that modern art has been +following a false route and is in danger of perishing in the bog or +falling over the cliff. If it is so we may congratulate ourselves that +those of our painters who are still following the rest of the world have +not so nearly reached the end of the road, and that those who are more +independent have discovered in time what that end is and have turned +back. + +It is because it is least that of to-day that I believe our art may be +that of to-morrow--it is because it is, of all art now going, that which +has most connection with the past that I hope the art of America may +prove to be the art of the future. + + + + + +VII + +AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS[C] + +[C] Address delivered before the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences on +February 22, 1908. Now revised and enlarged. + + +Augustus Saint-Gaudens was born in Dublin, Ireland, on the first day of +March, 1848, but was brought to America at the age of six months. His +childhood and youth were passed in the city of New York, as was a great +part of his working life; and though his origin was foreign, lifelong +associations had stamped him indelibly an American. The greater part of +his work was done in America; almost all of it was done for America; and +I do not think it is fancy that sees in his art the expression of a +distinctively American spirit. Yet from his mixed French and Irish +blood he may well have derived that mingling of the Latin sense of form +with a Celtic depth of sentiment which was so markedly characteristic of +his genius. + +His father, Bernard Paul Ernest Saint-Gaudens, was a shoemaker from the +little town of Aspet in Haute-Garonne, only a few miles from the town of +Saint-Gaudens, from which the family must have drawn its origin and its +name. His mother was Mary McGuinness, a native of Dublin. Augustus +Saint-Gaudens was one of several children born to this couple and not +the only artist among them, for his younger brother Louis also attained +some reputation as a sculptor, though his entire lack of ambition +prevented his achieving all that was expected of him by those who knew +his delicate talent. The boy Augustus attended the public schools of New +York and received there all the formal education he ever had; but at +thirteen it was necessary for him to face the problem of earning his +living. His artistic proclivities were probably already well marked, and +to give them some scope, while assuring him a regular trade at which +money could be earned, he was apprenticed in the good old way to a cameo +cutter named Louis Avet, said to be the first man to cut stone cameos in +the United States. Thus it came about that the greatest of American +sculptors had much such a practical apprenticeship as a Florentine of +the fifteenth century might have had. He himself always spoke of it as +"one of the most fortunate things that ever happened to him" and +attributed much of his success to the habit of faithful labor acquired +at this time. Probably, also, the habit of thinking in terms of relief, +fostered by years of work at this ancient art, was not without influence +in the moulding of his talent. + +His relations with Avet lasted from 1861 to 1864, when his master +quarrelled with him and abruptly dismissed him from his shop. The boy +was already a determined person; he believed that he had suffered an +injustice, and, though Avet went to his parents and tried to induce them +to send him back, he refused to return. A new master was found for him +in the person of a shell-cameo cutter named Jules LeBrethon, and with +him Saint-Gaudens remained three years. During his six years' +apprenticeship under his two masters the youth showed already that +energy and power of will that made him what he was. He meant to be +something more than an artisan, and he spent his evenings in the +classes, first of the Cooper Union, afterward of the National Academy of +Design, in the hard study of drawing, the true foundation of all the +fine arts. It was one of the elements of his superiority in his +profession that he could draw as few sculptors can, and he always felt +that he owed an especial debt to the Cooper Union, which he was glad to +repay when he modelled the statue of its venerable founder. Of the other +institution by whose freely given instruction he had profited, the +National Academy of Design, he became one of the most honored members. +By 1867, when he was nineteen years old, he had saved a little money and +was master of a trade that could be relied on to bring in more, and he +determined to go to Paris and begin the serious study of sculpture. He +worked, for a time, at the Petite École, and entered the studio of +Jouffroy in the École des Beaux-Arts in 1868, remaining until 1870. +During this time, and afterward, he was self-supporting, working half +his time at cameo cutting until his efforts at sculpture on a larger +scale began to bring in an income. + +When the Franco-Prussian War broke out Paris ceased to be a place for +the carrying on of the serious study of art, and Saint-Gaudens went to +Rome, where his associates were the French prizemen of the day, of whom +Mercié was one. He remained there until 1874, except for a visit to New +York in the winter of 1872-3 for the purpose of modelling a bust of +Senator Evarts, and one or two other busts, which were put into marble +upon his return to Rome. In those Roman days he executed his first +statue, a "Hiawatha," one of his few studies of the nude, and a +"Silence," a not very characteristic draped figure which yet fills with +some impressiveness her niche at the head of the grand stairway of the +Masonic Temple on Twenty-fourth Street. + +From 1875 to 1877 he had a studio in New York, where he seems to have +executed some of his earliest portrait reliefs. During these years he +came into contact with La Farge, for whom he turned painter and aided +in the execution of the decorations of Trinity Church in Boston. It was +at this time, also, that he received his first commissions for important +public work, those for the Farragut statue in Madison Square, the +Randall at Sailors' Snug Harbor, and the angels for Saint Thomas's +Church. He had married Augusta F. Homer in 1877, and in that year, +taking his bride and his commissions with him, he returned to Paris, +feeling, as many another young Paris-bred artist has felt, that there +only could such important works be properly carried out. The "Farragut" +was completed and exhibited in the plaster at the Salon of 1880, and +from that time his success was assured. For the rest of his life he was +constantly busy, receiving almost more commissions for work of +importance than it was possible for him to carry out. He returned to New +York in 1880, and in 1881 he opened the studio in Thirty-sixth Street, +where he remained for sixteen years and where so many of his greatest +works were executed. From that studio came many of his exquisite +portraits in relief, his caryatids and angelic figures, such as those +for the Morgan tomb, so unfortunately destroyed by fire in 1882 (a fate +since shared by the earlier angels of Saint Thomas's), the great statues +of Lincoln and Chapin, the "Shaw Memorial," and the "Adams Memorial"; +and in it was done all the preliminary work of the great equestrian +monument to General Sherman. + +It is in these years of his prime that he will ever be most fondly +remembered by those--and they are many--who had the privilege of his +friendship. Admittedly our foremost sculptor, and one of the founders of +the Society of American Artists, he became at once a person of +importance in the world of art; and as his brilliant career developed +he established intimate relationships with an ever-widening circle of +men in every walk of life, while no one who ever knew him well can have +felt anything but an abiding affection for him. That long, white studio +became a familiar meeting-place for all who were interested in any form +of art; and the Sunday afternoon concerts that were held there for many +years will be looked back to with regret as long as any of their +auditors remain alive. + +This studio was given up when Saint-Gaudens went abroad for the third +time, in 1897, to execute the Sherman group, and he never resumed his +residence in New York. In 1885 he had purchased a property at Cornish, +N.H., just across the Connecticut River from Windsor, Vt., and when he +returned to this country in 1900, covered with fresh honors but an ill +man, he made what had been a summer home his permanent abode. He named +it Aspet, after his father's birthplace, and there he erected two +studios and finished his Sherman statue. In these studios were executed +the second "Lincoln," the Parnell statue for Dublin, and much other +work. The larger studio was burned in 1904, but was rebuilt and the lost +work re-begun and carried to a conclusion. What can never be quite +replaced were two portraits of himself. A study, of the head only, in +the collection of the National Academy of Design and a sketch by Will H. +Low, painted in Paris in 1877, are now the only existing portraits of +him done from life in his best years. The Metropolitan Museum possesses +a portrait of him in his last years, by Miss Ellen Emmet, and a replica, +painted since his death, of my own earlier portrait. + +From the illness he brought back from Paris in 1900 Saint-Gaudens never +recovered. At times he showed something of his old vigor and was able +not only to do fine work but to indulge more in out-of-door sports than +he had ever done in his youth, while a growing love for nature and for +literature made his life fuller, in some respects, than in the days when +his own art more entirely absorbed him. But year by year his strength +grew less and his intervals of freedom from pain grew shorter, and he +was more and more forced to rely upon the corps of able and devoted +assistants which he gathered about him. He developed to an extraordinary +extent the faculty of communicating his ideas and desires to others and +of producing through their hands work essentially his own and of a +quality entirely beyond their ability; but it was at the cost of a +strain upon brain and nerve almost infinitely greater than would have +been involved in work done with his own hand. In the summer of 1906 he +broke down utterly, the work of his studio was interrupted, and he +ceased to see even his most intimate friends. He rallied somewhat from +this attack, and began again his heroic struggle against fate, directing +the work of assistants while himself so weak that he had to be carried +from the house to the studio. The end came on the evening of August 3, +1907. He died as he had lived, a member of no church, but a man of pure +and lofty character. As he had wished, his body was cremated, and his +ashes were temporarily deposited in the cemetery at Windsor, Vt., across +the river from his home. An informal funeral service was held in his +private studio on August 7, attended by friends and neighbors and by a +few old friends from a distance; but the gathering could include but a +few of the many who felt his death as a personal loss. + +The merits of Saint-Gaudens's work were fully recognized in his +lifetime. He was an officer of the Legion of Honor, a Corresponding +Member of the Institute of France, a member of half a dozen academies, +and the bearer of honorary degrees from the universities of Harvard, +Yale, and Princeton. But of all the honors he received there were two, +one of a public, the other of a private nature, which he himself valued +most highly: the one as showing the estimation in which his art was held +by his fellow artists, the other as an evidence of the personal +affection felt for him by his friends. At the Pan-American Exposition in +1901, upon the unanimous recommendation of the Jury of Fine Arts, +composed of painters, sculptors, and architects, he was awarded a +special diploma and medal of honor, "apart from and above all other +awards," an entirely exceptional honor, which marked him as the first of +American artists, as previously received honors had marked him one of +the greatest sculptors of his time. On June 23, 1905, the artistic and +literary colony which had gradually grown up about his home in Cornish +celebrated the twentieth anniversary of his coming there by a fête and +open-air masque held in the groves of Aspet. The beauty of this +spectacle has become almost legendary. The altar with its columned +canopy, which served for a background to the play, still stands, or +recently stood, though much dilapidated by weather, as it was +immortalized by the sculptor himself in a commemorative plaquette (Pl. +23) which is among the most charming of his minor works. He planned if +he had lived to perpetuate it in enduring marble, and this task has now +been taken up by his wife, who means to dedicate the monument as a +fitting memorial to a great artist and a noble man in the place he loved +as his chosen home. + +Some part of the vivid and lovable personality of Augustus +Saint-Gaudens must have been visible, almost at a glance, to any one who +ever came in contact with him--to any one, even, who ever saw his +portrait. In his spare but strong-knit figure, his firm but supple +hands, his manner of carrying himself, his every gesture, one felt the +abounding vitality, the almost furious energy of the man. That +extraordinary head, with its heavy brow beetling above the small but +piercing eyes, its red beard and crisp, wiry hair, its projecting jaw +and great, strongly modelled nose, was alive with power--with power of +intellect no less than of will. His lack of early education gave him a +certain diffidence and a distrust of his own gifts of expression. He was +apt to overrate the mere verbal facility of others and to underestimate +himself in the comparison--indeed, a certain humility was strongly +marked in him, even as regards his art, though he was self-confident +also. When he was unconstrained his great powers of observation, his +shrewdness of judgment, his bubbling humor, and a picturesque vivacity +of phrase not uncommon among artists made him one of the most entrancing +of talkers. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 23.--Saint-Gaudens. "Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque."] + +Underneath his humor and his gayety, however, there lay a deep-seated +Celtic melancholy, and beside his energy was an infinite patience at the +service of an exacting artistic conscience. The endless painstaking of +his work and the time he took over it were almost proverbial. He was +twelve years engaged upon the "Shaw Memorial" and eleven upon the +"Sherman," and, though he did much other work while these were in +progress, yet it was his constant revision, his ever-renewed striving +for perfection that kept them so long achieving. The "Diana" of the +Madison Square Garden was taken down from her tower because he and the +architect, Stanford White, thought her too large, and was entirely +remodelled on a smaller scale. And with this patience went a gentleness, +a sweetness, a delicate sensitiveness, and an abounding humanity and +sympathy. He could be almost ruthless in the assertion of his will when +the interests of his art or of justice seemed to demand it, yet there +was a tender-heartedness in him which made it distressing to him to +inflict pain on any one. The conflict of these elements in his nature +sometimes made his actions seem inconsistent and indecipherable even to +those who knew him. He would be long-suffering, compromising, +disinclined to strike; but when he was at last roused the blow would be +as staggering as it was unexpected. It was as if he struck the harder to +have done with it and to spare himself the pain of striking again. + +It was his whole-hearted devotion to his art which caused his rare acts +of self-assertion, and it was this same devotion, no less than his +natural kindliness, that made him ever helpful to younger artists who +showed any promise of future worth. Even in his last days of unspeakable +suffering he would summon what was left of his old strength to give a +word of criticism and advice, above all, a word of commendation, to any +one who needed the one or had earned the other. The essential goodness +of the man was most felt by those who stood nearest him, and most of +all, perhaps, by his actual coworkers. He could command, as few have +been able to do, the love and devotion of his assistants. To all who +knew him the man himself seemed finer, rarer, sweeter than his work, and +the gap he has left in their lives will be even more impossible to fill +than his place in American art. + +But the personality of an artist, though he be a great one, is for the +memory of his private friends. It is only as it colors his art that it +is of public interest. It is his art itself, his gift to the world, that +the world cares for; it is of the kind and quality of that art, the +nature and the degree of its greatness, that the world wishes to hear. +Because the man was my friend I have wished to give some glimpse of the +manner of man he was; because the artist was the greatest our country +has produced I am to try to give some idea of his art, of the elements +of its strength, and of the limitations which are as necessary as its +qualities. + +The time of Saint-Gaudens's study in Paris was a time of great +importance in the development of modern sculpture, and, although +Jouffroy was not himself a sculptor of the highest rank, his studio was +a centre for what was then the new movement in the sculpture of France. +The essential thing in this movement was the abandoning of the formal +imitation of second-rate antiques and the substitution of the sculpture +of the Italian Renaissance as a source of inspiration and of the direct +study of nature as a means of self-expression. There had always been +individual sculptors of power and originality in France, but the +movement of the French school of sculpture, as a whole, away from the +pseudo classicism which had long dominated it was really inaugurated by +Paul Dubois only a few years before Saint-Gaudens's arrival in Paris. +Many of the men destined to a brilliant part in the history of modern +sculpture were trained in the _atelier_ of Jouffroy. Falguière and +Saint-Marceau had but just left that studio when the young American +entered it, and Mercié was his fellow student there. Dalou and Rodin +have since made these men seem old-fashioned and academic, but they +were then, and for many years afterward, the heads of the new school; +and of this new school, so different from anything he had known in +America, Saint-Gaudens inevitably became a part. His own pronounced +individuality, and perhaps his comparative isolation during the years of +his greatest productivity, gave his art a character of its own, unlike +any other, but to the French school of sculpture of the third quarter of +the nineteenth century he essentially belonged. + +Of course, his style was not formed in a moment. His "Hiawatha" seems, +to-day, much such a piece of neo-classicism as was being produced by +other men in the Rome of that time, and the "Silence," though somewhat +more modern in accent, is an academic work such as might have been +expected from a docile pupil of his master. The relief of angels for the +reredos of Saint Thomas's Church is the earliest important work which +shows his personal manner. It was undertaken in collaboration with John +La Farge, and perhaps the influence of La Farge, and of that eminently +picturesque genius Stanford White, mingled with that of the younger +French school in forming its decorative and almost pictorial character. +It was a kind of improvisation, done at prodigious speed and without +study from nature--a sketch rather than a completed work of art, but a +sketch to be slowly developed into the reliefs of the Farragut pedestal, +the angels of the Morgan tomb, the caryatids of the Vanderbilt +mantelpiece, and, at length, into such a masterpiece as the +"Amor-Caritas." In each of these developments the work becomes less +picturesque and more formal, the taste is purified, the exuberance of +decorative feeling is more restrained. The final term is reached in the +caryatids for the Albright Gallery at Buffalo--works of his last days, +when his hands were no longer able to shape the clay, yet essentially +his though he never touched them; works of an almost austere nobility of +style, the most grandly monumental figures he ever produced. + +The commonest criticism on Saint-Gaudens's art has been that it is not, +primarily, sculptural in its inspiration; and, in a sense, the criticism +is justified. One need not, perhaps, greatly care whether it is true or +not. It is, after all, only a matter of definition, and if we were +forbidden to call his work sculpture at all and required to find another +name for it, the important fact that it is art--art of the finest, the +most exquisite, at times the most powerful--would in no wise be altered. +Ghiberti went beyond the traditions of sculpture in relief, introduced +perspective into his compositions, modelled trees and rocks and clouds +and cast them in bronze, made pictures, if you like, instead of reliefs. +Does any one care? Is it not enough that they are beautiful pictures? +The gates of the Baptistry of Florence are still worthy, as the greatest +sculptor since the Greeks thought them, to be the gates of paradise. A +work of art remains a work of art, call it what you please, and a thing +of beauty will be a joy forever, whether or not you can pigeonhole it in +some ready-made category. After all, the critical pigeonholes are made +for the things, not the things for the pigeonholes. The work is there, +and if it does not fit your preconceived definition the fault is as +likely to be in the definition as in the work itself. + +And the first and most essential thing to note about the art of Augustus +Saint-Gaudens is that it is always art of the purest--free in an +extraordinary degree from the besetting sins of naturalism and the +scientific temper on the one hand and of the display of cleverness and +technical brilliancy on the other. Never more than in our own day have +these been the great temptations of an able artist: that he should in +the absorption of study forget the end in the means and produce +demonstrations of anatomy or of the laws of light rather than statues or +pictures; or that he should, in the joy of exercising great talents, +seem to say, "See how well I can do it!" and invent difficulties for the +sake of triumphantly resolving them, becoming a virtuoso rather than a +creator. Of the meaner temptation of mere sensationalism--the desire to +attract attention by ugliness and eccentricity lest one should be unable +to secure it by truth and beauty--one need not speak. It is the +temptation of vulgar souls. But great and true artists have yielded, +occasionally or habitually, to these other two; Saint-Gaudens never +does. I know no work of his to which raw nature has been admitted, in +which a piece of study has been allowed to remain as such without the +moulding touch of art to subdue it to its place; and I know only one +which has any spice of bravura--the Logan statue--and the bravura is +there because the subject seemed to demand it, not because the artist +wished it. The dash and glitter are those of "Black Jack Logan," not of +Saint-Gaudens. The sculptor strove to render them as he strove to render +higher qualities at other times, but they remain antipathetic to his +nature, and the statue is one of the least satisfactory of his works. He +is essentially the artist--the artificer of beauty--ever bent on the +making of a lovely and significant thing; and the study of nature and +the resources of his craft are but tools and are never allowed to become +anything more. + +If, then, the accusation that Saint-Gaudens's art is not sculptural +means that he was a designer rather than a modeller, that he cared for +composition more than for representation, that the ensemble interested +him more than the details, I would cheerfully admit that the accusation +is well founded. Such marvels of rendering as Rodin could give us, +before he lost himself in the effort to deserve that reputation as a +profound thinker which has been thrust upon him, were not for +Saint-Gaudens. The modelling of the _morceau_ was not particularly his +affair. The discrimination of hard and soft, of bone and muscle and +integument, the expression of tension where a fleshy tissue is tightly +drawn over the framework beneath, or of weight where it falls away from +it--these were not the things that most compelled his interest or in +which he was most successful. For the human figure as a figure, for the +inherent beauty of its marvellous mechanism, he did not greatly care. +The problems of bulk and mass and weight and movement which have +occupied sculptors from the beginning were not especially his problems. +It may have been due to the nature of the commissions he received that, +after the "Hiawatha" of his student days, he modelled no nude except the +"Diana" of the tower--a purely decorative figure, designed for distant +effect, in which structural modelling would have been out of place +because invisible. But it was not accident that in such draped figures +as the "Amor-Caritas" (Pl. 24) or the caryatids of the Vanderbilt +mantelpiece there is little effort to make the figure visible beneath +the draperies. In the hands of a master of the figure--of one of those +artists to whom the expressiveness and the beauty of the human structure +is all in all--drapery is a means of rendering the masses and the +movement of the figure more apparent than they would be in the nude. In +such works as these it is a thing beautiful in itself, for its own +ripple and flow and ordered intricacy. The figure is there beneath +the drapery, but the drapery is expressive of the mood of the artist and +of the sentiment of the work rather than especially explanatory of the +figure. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 24.--Saint-Gaudens. "Amor Caritas."] + +First of all, by nature and by training, Saint-Gaudens was a designer, +and exquisiteness of design was the quality he most consciously strove +for--the quality on which he expended his unresting, unending, +persevering toil. From the start one feels that design is his principal +preoccupation, that he is thinking mainly of the pattern of the whole, +its decorative effect and play of line, its beauty of masses and spaces, +its fitness for its place and its surroundings; in a word, its +composition. In the beginning, as a workman in the shop of the cameo +cutter, he was concerned with a kind of art in which perfection of +composition is almost the sole claim to serious consideration. Then he +produces a multiplicity of small reliefs, dainty, exquisite, infallibly +charming in their arrangement--things which are so dependent on design +for their very existence that they seem scarcely modelled at all. He +goes on to decorative figures in the round, to heroic statues, to +monumental groups, but always it is design that he thinks of first and +last--design, now, in three dimensions rather than in two--design +properly sculptural rather than pictorial, in so much as it deals with +bosses and concaves, with solid matter in space--but still design. This +power of design rises to higher uses as time goes on, is bent to the +interpretation of lofty themes and the expression of deep emotions, but +it is in its nature the same power that produced the delicate, ethereal +beauty of the reliefs. The infinite fastidiousness of a master designer, +constantly reworking and readjusting his design, that every part shall +be perfect and that no fold or spray of leafage shall be out of its +proper place, never satisfied that his composition is beyond improvement +while an experiment remains untried--this is what cost him years of +labor. His first important statue, the "Farragut," is a masterpiece of +restrained and elegant yet original and forceful design--a design, too, +that includes the pedestal and the bench below, and of which the figures +in bas-relief are almost as important a part as the statue itself. In +later and maturer work, with a more clarified taste and a deeper +feeling, he can reach such unsurpassable expressiveness of composition +as is shown in the "Shaw Memorial" or the great equestrian statue of +Sherman. + +Saint-Gaudens's mastery of low relief was primarily a matter of this +power of design, but it was conditioned also upon two other qualities: +knowledge of drawing and extreme sensitiveness to delicate modulation of +surface. And by drawing I mean not merely knowledge of form and +proportion and the exact rendering of these, in which sense a statue may +be said to be well drawn if its measurements are correct--I mean that +much more subtle and difficult art, the rendering in two dimensions only +of the appearance of objects of three dimensions. Sculpture in the round +is the simplest and, in a sense, the easiest of the arts. It deals with +actual form--a piece of sculpture does not merely look like the form of +an object, it _is_ the form of an object. Leaving out of the count, for +the moment, the refinements and the illusions which may be added to +it--which must be added to it to make it art--it is the reproduction in +another material of the actual forms of things. Something which shall +answer for it, to the uninitiate, may be produced by merely casting +natural objects; and there is a great deal that is called sculpture +which scarcely aims at anything more than the production, by a more +difficult method, of something like a plaster cast from nature. It is +the very simplicity of the art that makes its difficulty, for to avoid +the look of casting and achieve the feeling of art requires the most +delicate handling and the most powerful inspiration, and there is need +in the art of sculpture for the rarest qualities of the greatest minds. +The art of drawing is entirely different. It is all illusion, it deals +only in appearances. Its aim is to depict on a flat surface the aspect +of objects supposed to stand behind it and to be seen through it, and +its means are two branches of the science of optics. It is based on the +study of perspective and on the study of the way light falls upon +objects and reveals their shapes and the direction of their surfaces by +the varying degrees of their illumination. Of this art a sculptor in the +round need not necessarily know anything, and, in fact, many of them, +unfortunately, know altogether too little of it. The maker of a statue +need not think about foreshortenings: if he gives the correct form the +foreshortening will take care of itself. Sometimes it does so in a +disastrous manner! Theoretically he need not worry over light and shade, +although of course he does, in practice, think about it and rely upon +it, more or less. If he gives the true forms they will necessarily have +the true light and shade. But low relief, standing between sculpture and +drawing, is really more closely related to drawing than to sculpture--is +really a kind of drawing--and this is why so few sculptors succeed in +it. + +It is a kind of drawing but an exceedingly difficult kind--the most +delicate and difficult of any of the arts that deal with form alone. As +to the contour, it stands on the same ground with drawing in any other +material. The linear part of it requires exactly the same degree and +the same kind of talent as linear design with a pen or with a burin. But +for all that stands within the contour, for the suggestion of interior +forms and the illusion of solidity, it depends on means of the utmost +subtlety. It exists, as all drawing does, by light and shade, but the +shadows are not produced by the mere darkening of the surface--they are +produced by projections and recessions, by the inclination of the planes +away from or toward the light. The lower the relief the more subtle and +tender must be the variation of the surface which produces them, and +therefore success in relief is one of the best attainable measures of a +sculptor's fineness of touch and perfection of craftsmanship. But as the +light and shade is produced by actual forms which are yet quite unlike +the true forms of nature, it follows that the artist in relief can never +imitate either the shape or the depth of the shadow he sees in nature. +His art becomes one of suggestions and equivalents--an art which can +give neither the literal truth of form nor the literal truth of +aspect--an art at the farthest remove from direct representation. And +success in it becomes, therefore, one of the best tests of a sculptor's +artistry--of his ability to produce essential beauty by the treatment of +his material, rather than to imitate successfully external fact. + +As the degree of relief varies, also, from the lowest possible to that +highest relief which, nearly approaches sculpture in the round, the +problems involved constantly vary. At each stage there is a new +compromise to be made, a new adjustment to find, between fact and +illusion, between the real form and the desired appearance. And there +may be a number of different degrees of relief in the same work, even in +different parts of the same figure, so that the art of relief becomes +one of the most complicated and difficult of arts. It has not, indeed, +the added complication of color, but neither has it the resources of +color, success in which will more or less compensate for failure +elsewhere. There is no permissible failure in bas-relief, any more than +in sculpture in the round, and its difficulties are far greater. Nothing +but truest feeling, completest knowledge, consummate skill will serve. + +This explanation may give some measure of what I mean when I say that I +believe Augustus Saint-Gaudens the most complete master of relief since +the fifteenth century. + +He has produced a series of works which run through the whole range of +the art, from lowest relief to highest; from things of which the relief +is so infinitesimal that they seem as if dreamed into existence rather +than wrought in bronze or marble to things which are virtually engaged +statues; from things which you fear a chance touch might brush away, +like a pastel of Whistler's, to things as solid and enduring in +appearance as in actual material. And in all these things there is the +same inevitable mastery of design and of drawing, the same infinite +resource and the same technical perfection. The "Butler Children" (Pl. +25), the "Schiff Children," the "Sarah Redwood Lee" (Pl. 26), to name +but a few of his masterpieces of this kind, are in their perfection of +spacing, their grace of line, their exquisite and ethereal illusiveness +of surface, comparable only to the loveliest works of the Florentine +Renaissance; while the assured mastery of the most complicated problems +of relief evinced in the "Shaw Memorial"--a mastery which shows, in the +result, no trace of the strenuous and long-continued effort that it +cost--is unsurpassed--I had almost said unequalled--in any work of any +epoch. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 25.--Saint-Gaudens. "The Butler Children."] + +Illustration can give but a faint idea of the special beauties of this +or that particular work in this long series. It can show no more than +the composition and the draughtsmanship. The refinement of workmanship, +the sensitiveness and subtlety of modelling, can be appreciated only +before the works themselves. And this sensitiveness and delicacy of +workmanship, this mastery of the problems of relief, with its reliance +on illusion and its necessary abstention from realization, is applied to +sculpture in the round, and becomes with Saint-Gaudens, as it did with +the sculptors of the Florentine Renaissance, the means of escape from +the matter of fact. The concrete art of sculpture becomes an art of +mystery and of suggestion--an art having affinities with that of +painting. Hollows are filled up, shadows are obliterated, lines are +softened or accentuated, as the effect may require, details are +eliminated or made prominent as they are less or more essential and +significant, as they hinder or aid the expressiveness of the whole. It +is by such methods that beauty is achieved, that the most unpromising +material is subdued to the purposes of art, that even our hideous modern +costume may be made to yield a decorative effect. Pure sculpture, as the +ancients understood it, the art of form _per se_, demands the nude +figure, or a costume which reveals it rather than hides it. The costume +of to-day reveals as little of the figure as possible, and, unlike +mediæval armor, it has no beauty of its own. A painter may make it +interesting by dwelling on color or tone or texture, or may so lose it +in shadow that it ceases to count at all except as a space of darkness. +A sculptor can do none of these things, and if he is to make it serve +the ends of beauty he has need of all the resourcefulness and all the +skill of the master of low relief. It was fortunate that the artist +whose greatest task was to commemorate the heroes of the Civil War +should have had the temperament and the training of such a master, and I +know of no other sculptor than Saint-Gaudens who has so magnificently +succeeded in the rendering of modern clothing--no other who could have +made the uniform of Farragut or the frock coat of Lincoln as interesting +as the armor of Colleone or the toga of Augustus. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 26.--Saint-Gaudens. "Sarah Redwood Lee."] + +But if the genius of Saint-Gaudens was primarily a decorative genius--if +it was, even, in his earlier work, a trifle picturesque, so that, as he +said himself, he had "to fight against picturesqueness," his work was +never pictorial. He never indulged in perspective or composed his +reliefs on more than one plane; never took such liberties with the +traditions of sculpture as did Ghiberti, or painted pictures in bronze +or marble as more than one modern has done. His very feeling for +decoration kept him from pictorial realism, and his fight against +picturesqueness was nobly won. His design becomes ever cleaner and more +classic; by years of work and of experience he becomes stronger and +stronger in the more purely sculptural qualities--attains a grasp of +form and structure only second to his mastery of composition. He is +always a consummate artist--in his finest works he is a great sculptor +in the strictest sense of the word. + +I have dwelt somewhat at length upon technical matters because technical +power is the first necessity for an artist; because technical mastery is +that for which he consciously endeavors; because the technical language +of his art is the necessary vehicle of expression for his thoughts and +emotions, and determines, even, the nature of the thoughts and emotions +he shall express. But while the technical accomplishment of an artist +is the most necessary part of his art, without which his imagination +would be mute, it is not the highest or the most significant part of it. +I have tried to show that Saint-Gaudens was a highly accomplished +artist, the equal of any of his contemporaries, the superior of most. +What made him something much more than this--something infinitely more +important for us--was the vigor and loftiness of his imagination. +Without his imaginative power he would have been an artist of great +distinction, of whom any country might be proud; with it he became a +great creator, able to embody in enduring bronze the highest ideals and +the deepest feelings of a nation and of a time. + +It is a penetrating and sympathetic imagination that gave him his +unerring grasp of character, that enabled him to seize upon the +significant elements of a personality, to divine the attitude and the +gesture that should reveal it, to eliminate the unessential, to present +to us the man. This is the imagination of the portrait-painter, and +Saint-Gaudens has shown it again and again, in many of his reliefs and +memorial tablets, above all in his portrait statues. He showed it +conclusively in so early a work as the "Farragut" (Pl. 27), a work that +remains one of the modern masterpieces of portrait statuary. The man +stands there forever, feet apart, upon his swaying deck, his glass in +one strong hand, cool, courageous, ready, full of determination but +absolutely without bluster or braggadocio, a sailor, a gentleman, and a +hero. He showed it again, and with ampler maturity, in that august +figure of "Lincoln" (Pl. 28), grandly dignified, austerely simple, +sorrowfully human, risen from the chair of state that marks his office, +but about to speak as a man to men, his bent head and worn face +filled with a sense of power, but even more with the sadness of +responsibility--filled, above all, with a yearning, tender passion of +sympathy and love. In imaginative presentation of character, in nobility +of feeling and breadth of treatment, no less than in perfection of +workmanship, these are among the world's few worthy monuments to its +great men. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 27.--Saint-Gaudens. "Farragut."] + +And they are monuments to Americans by an American. Saint-Gaudens had +lived through the time of the Civil War, had felt, as a boy, the stir of +its great happenings in his blood, and its epic emotions had become a +part of his consciousness, deep-seated at the roots of his nature. The +feelings of the American people were his feelings, and his +representations of these and of other heroes of that great struggle are +among the most national as they are among the most vital things that our +country has produced in art. + +But if Saint-Gaudens's imagination was thus capable of raising the +portrait to the dignity of the type, it was no less capable of endowing +the imagined type with all the individuality of the portrait. In the +"Deacon Chapin" (Pl. 29), of Springfield, we have a purely ideal +production, the finest embodiment of New England Puritanism in our art, +for no portrait of the real Chapin existed. This swift-striding, +stern-looking old man, who clasps his Bible as Moses clasped the tables +of the law and grips his peaceful walking-stick as though it were a +sword, is a Puritan of the Puritans; but he is an individual also--a +rough-hewn piece of humanity with plenty of the old Adam about him--an +individual so clearly seen and so vigorously characterized that one can +hardly believe the statue an invention or realize that no such old +Puritan deacon ever existed in the flesh. Something of this imaginative +quality there is in almost everything Saint-Gaudens touched, even in +his purely decorative figures. His angels and caryatides are not +classical goddesses but modern women, lovely, but with a personal and +particular loveliness, not insisted upon but delicately suggested. And +it is not the personality of the model who chanced to pose for them but +an invented personality, the expression of the nobility, the sweetness, +and the pure-mindedness of their creator. And in such a figure as that +of the "Adams Memorial" (Pl. 30), in Rock Creek Cemetery in Washington, +his imaginative power reaches to a degree of impressiveness almost +unequalled in modern art. One knows of nothing since the tombs of the +Medici that fills one with the same hushed awe as this shrouded, hooded, +deeply brooding figure, rigid with contemplation, still with an eternal +stillness, her soul rapt from her body on some distant quest. Is she +Nirvana? Is she The Peace of God? She has been given many names--her +maker would give her none. Her meaning is mystery; she is the +everlasting enigma. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 28.--Saint-Gaudens. "Lincoln."] + +Not the greatest artist could twice sound so deep a note as this. The +figure remains unique in the work of the sculptor as it is unique in the +art of the century. Yet, perhaps, Saint-Gaudens's greatest works are two +in which all the varied elements of his genius find simultaneous +expression; into which his mastery of composition, his breadth and +solidity of structure, his technical skill, his insight into character, +and his power of imagination enter in nearly equal measure: the "Shaw +Memorial" and the great equestrian group of the "Sherman Monument." + +The "Shaw Memorial" (Pl. 31) is a relief, but a relief of many planes. +The marching troops are in three files, one behind the other, the +varying distances from the spectator marked by differences of the degree +of projection. Nearer than all of them is the equestrian figure of Shaw +himself, the horse and rider modelled nearly but not quite in the round. +The whole scale of relief was altered in the course of the work, after +it had once been nearly completed, and the mastery of the infinitely +complicated problem of relief in many degrees is supreme. But all the +more because the scheme was so full and so varied, the artist has +carefully avoided the pictorial in his treatment. There is no +perspective, the figures being all on the same scale, and there is no +background, no setting of houses or landscape. Everywhere, between and +above the figures, is the flat surface which is the immemorial tradition +of sculpture in relief; and the fact that it _is_ a surface, +representing nothing, is made more clear by the inscription written upon +it--an inscription placed there, consciously or unconsciously, that it +might have that very effect. The composition is magnificent, whether for +its intrinsic beauty of arrangement--its balancing of lines and +spaces--or for its perfect expressiveness. The rhythmic step of marching +men is perfectly rendered, and the guns fill the middle of the panel in +an admirable pattern, without confusion or monotony. The heads are +superb in characterization, strikingly varied and individual, yet each a +strongly marked racial type, unmistakably African in all its forms. + +[Illustration: Plate 29.--Saint-Gaudens. "Deacon Chapin."] + +These are merits, and merits of a very high order, enough of themselves +to place the work in the front rank of modern sculpture, but they are, +after all, its minor merits. What makes it the great thing it is is the +imaginative power displayed in it--the depth of emotion expressed, and +expressed with perfect simplicity and directness and an entire +absence of parade. The negro troops are marching steadily, soberly, +with high seriousness of purpose, and their white leader rides beside +them, drawn sword in hand, but with no military swagger, courageous, yet +with a hint of melancholy, ready not only to lay down his life but to +face, if need be, an ignominious death for the cause he believes to be +just. And above them, laden with poppy and with laurels, floats the +Death Angel pointing out the way. + +[Illustration: Copyright, Curtis & Cameron. +Plate 30.--Saint-Gaudens. "Adams Memorial."] + +It is a work which artists may study again and again with growing +admiration and increasing profit, yet it is one that has found its way +straight to the popular heart. It is not always--it is not often--that +the artists and the public are thus at one. When they are it is safe to +assume that the work they equally admire is truly great--that it belongs +to the highest order of noble works of art. + +The Sherman group (Pl. 32), though it has been more criticised than the +"Shaw Memorial," seems to me, if possible, an even finer work. The main +objection to it has been that it is not sufficiently "monumental," and, +indeed, it has not the massiveness nor the repose of such a work as +Donatello's "Gattamelata," the greatest of all equestrian statues. It +could not well have these qualities in the same degree, its motive being +what it is, but they are, perhaps, not ill exchanged for the character +and the nationalism so marked in horse and rider and for the +irresistible onward rush of movement never more adequately expressed. In +all other respects the group seems to me almost beyond criticism. The +composition--composition, now, in the round and to be considered from +many points of view--builds up superbly; the flow of line in wing and +limb and drapery is perfect; the purely sculptural problems of +anatomical rendering, equine and human, are thoroughly resolved; the +modelling, as such, is almost as fine as the design. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De. W.C. Ward. +Plate 31.--Saint-Gaudens. "Shaw Memorial."] + +To the boyish Saint-Gaudens Sherman had seemed the typical American +hero. To the matured artist he had sat for an admirable bust. The +sculptor had thus an unusual knowledge of his subject, a perfect +sympathy with his theme; and he has produced a work of epic sweep and +significance. Tall and erect, the general sits his horse, his military +cloak bellying out behind him, his trousers strapped down over his +shoes, his hat in his right hand, dropping at arm's length behind his +knee, his bare head like that of an old eagle, looking straight forward. +The horse is as long and thin as his rider, with a tremendous stride; +and his big head, closely reined in, twitches viciously at the bridle. +Before the horse and rider, upon the ground, yet as if new-lighted there +from an aerial existence, half walks, half flies, a splendid winged +figure, one arm outstretched, the other brandishing the palm--Victory +leading them on. She has a certain fierce wildness of aspect, but her +rapt gaze and half-open mouth indicate the seer of visions--peace is +ahead, and an end of war. On the bosom of her gown is broidered the +eagle of the United States, for she is an American Victory, as this is +an American man on an American horse; and the broken pine bough beneath +the horse's feet localizes the victorious march--it is the march through +Georgia to the sea. + +Long ago I expressed my conviction that the "Sherman Monument" is third +in rank of the great equestrian statues of the world. To-day I am not +sure that that conviction remains unaltered. Donatello's "Gattamelata" +is unapproached and unapproachable in its quiet dignity; Verrocchio's +"Colleone" is unsurpassed in picturesque attractiveness. Both are +consecrated by the admiration of centuries. To-day I am not sure that +this work of an American sculptor is not, in its own way, equal to +either of them. + +There are those who are troubled by the introduction of the symbolical +figures in such works as the "Shaw Memorial" and the Sherman statue; +and, indeed, it was a bold enterprise to place them where they are, +mingling thus in the same work the real and the ideal, the actual and +the allegorical. But the boldness seems to me abundantly justified by +success. In either case the entire work is pitched to the key of these +figures; the treatment of the whole is so elevated by style and so +infused with imagination that there is no shock of unlikeness or +difficulty of transition. And these figures are not merely necessary to +the composition, an essential part of its beauty--they are even more +essential to the expression of the artist's thought. Without that +hovering Angel of Death, the negro troops upon the "Shaw Memorial" might +be going anywhere, to battle or to review. We should have a passing +regiment, nothing more. Without the striding Victory before him, the +impetuous movement of Sherman's horse would have no especial +significance. And these figures are no mere conventional allegories; +they are true creations. To their creator the unseen was as real as the +seen--nay, it was more so. That Shaw was riding to his death at the +command of duty was, the only thing that made Shaw memorable. That +Sherman was marching to a victory the fruits of which should be peace +was the essential thing about Sherman. Death and Duty--Victory and +Peace--in each case the compound ideal found its expression in a figure +entirely original and astonishingly living: a _person_ as truly as Shaw +or Sherman themselves. He could not have left them out. It were +better to give up the work entirely than to do it otherwise than as he +saw it. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 32.--Saint-Gaudens. "Sherman."] + +I have described and discussed but a few of the many works of this great +artist, choosing those which seem to me the most significant and the +most important, and in doing so I have keenly felt the inadequacy of +words to express the qualities of an art which exists by forms. +Fortunately, the works themselves are, for the most part, readily +accessible. In the originals, in casts, or in photographs, they may be +studied by every one. Nothing is more difficult than to estimate justly +the greatness of an object that is too near to us--it is only as it +recedes into the distance that the mountain visibly overtops its +neighboring hills. It is difficult to understand that this man so lately +familiar to us, moving among us as one of ourselves, is of the company +of the immortals. Yet I believe, as we make this study of his works, as +we yield ourselves to the graciousness of his charm or are exalted by +the sweep of his imagination, we shall come to feel an assured +conviction that Augustus Saint-Gaudens was not merely the most +accomplished artist of America, not merely one of the foremost sculptors +of his time--we shall feel that he is one of those great, creative +minds, transcending time and place, not of America or of to-day, but of +the world and forever. + +Where, among such minds, he will take his rank we need not ask. It is +enough that he is among them. Such an artist is assuredly a benefactor +of his country, and it is eminently fitting that his gift to us should +be acknowledged by such tribute as we can pay him. By his works in other +lands and by his world-wide fame he sheds a glory upon the name of +America, helping to convince the world that here also are those who +occupy themselves with the things of the spirit, that here also are +other capabilities than those of industrial energy and material success. +In his many minor works he has endowed us with an inexhaustible heritage +of beauty--beauty which is "about the best thing God invents." He is the +educator of our taste and of more than our taste--of our sentiment and +our emotions. In his great monuments he has not only given us fitting +presentments of our national heroes; he has expressed, and in expressing +elevated, our loftiest ideals; he has expressed, and in expressing +deepened, our profoundest feelings. He has become the voice of all that +is best in the American people, and his works are incentives to +patriotism and lessons in devotion to duty. + +But the great and true artist is more than a benefactor of his country, +he is a benefactor of the human race. The body of Saint-Gaudens is +ashes, but his mind, his spirit, his character have taken on enduring +forms and are become a part of the inheritance of mankind. And if, in +the lapse of ages, his very name should be forgotten--as are the names +of many great artists who have gone before him--yet his work will +remain; and while any fragment of it is decipherable the world will be +the richer in that he lived. + + + + +[Transcriber's Note: In the Table of Illustrations and in the caption for +plate 17, Bolensa was corrected to Bolsena.] + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Artist and Public, by Kenyon Cox + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTIST AND PUBLIC *** + +***** This file should be named 16655-8.txt or 16655-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/6/6/5/16655/ + +Produced by Ted Garvin, Melissa Er-Raqabi and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/16655-8.zip b/16655-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..031e397 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-8.zip diff --git a/16655-h.zip b/16655-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e5d1666 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h.zip diff --git a/16655-h/16655-h.htm b/16655-h/16655-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..20ffa1a --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/16655-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,4167 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Artist And Public, by Kenyon Cox. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- + p { margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; + } + hr { width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; + } + + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;} + + body{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + + img {border: 0;} + + .linenum {position: absolute; top: auto; left: 4%;} /* poetry number */ + .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;} + .pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; font-size: smaller; text-align: right;} /* page numbers */ + .sidenote {width: 20%; padding-bottom: .5em; padding-top: .5em; + padding-left: .5em; padding-right: .5em; margin-left: 1em; + float: right; clear: right; margin-top: 1em; + font-size: smaller; background: #eeeeee; border: dashed 1px;} + + .bb {border-bottom: solid 2px;} + .bl {border-left: solid 2px;} + .bt {border-top: solid 2px;} + .br {border-right: solid 2px;} + .bbox {border: solid 2px;} + + .center {text-align: center;} + .right {text-align: right;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + .u {text-decoration: underline;} + + .caption {font-weight: bold;} + + .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center;} + + .figleft {float: left; clear: left; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: + 1em; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .figright {float: right; clear: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; + margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .footnotes {border: dashed 1px;} + .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;} + .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;} + .fnanchor {vertical-align: super; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;} + + .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;} + .poem br {display: none;} + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em;} + .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 2em;} + .poem span.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 4em;} + // --> + /* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artist and Public, by Kenyon Cox + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Artist and Public + And Other Essays On Art Subjects + +Author: Kenyon Cox + +Release Date: September 5, 2005 [EBook #16655] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTIST AND PUBLIC *** + + + + +Produced by Ted Garvin, Melissa Er-Raqabi and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + + + + + +</pre> + + + +<h1>ARTIST AND PUBLIC</h1> + +<h2>AND OTHER<br /> +ESSAYS ON ART SUBJECTS</h2> + + +<h3>BY</h3> +<h2>KENYON COX</h2> + + + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><a name="p01_t" id="p01_t"></a></p> +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p01.jpg"> +<img src="images/p01_t.jpg" width="320" height="258" +alt="From a photograph by Braun, Clement & Co. Plate 1.—Millet. "The Goose Girl." In the collection of Mme. Saulnier, Bordeaux." +title="From a photograph by Braun, Clement & Co. Plate 1.—Millet. "The Goose Girl." In the collection of Mme. Saulnier, Bordeaux." /> +</a><span class="caption">From a photograph by Braun, Clement & Co. Plate 1.—Millet. "The Goose Girl." In the collection of Mme. Saulnier, Bordeaux.</span> +</div> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h1>ARTIST AND PUBLIC</h1> + +<h2>AND OTHER<br /> +ESSAYS ON ART SUBJECTS</h2> + + +<h3>BY</h3> +<h2>KENYON COX</h2> + + +<h3><i>WITH THIRTY-TWO ILLUSTRATIONS</i></h3> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p class="center">CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS<br /> +NEW YORK MCMXIV +</p> + + + +<p class="center"><i>Copyright, 1914, by Charles Scribner's Sons<br /> +Published September, 1914</i> +</p> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p class="center">TO<br /> +J.D.C.<br /> +IN GRATEFUL RECOGNITION OF UNFAILING KINDNESS<br /> +THIS BOOK IS INSCRIBED +</p> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>PREFACE</h2> +<div style="margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%;"> + +<p>In "The Classic Point of View," published three years ago, I endeavored +to give a clear and definitive statement of the principles on which all +my criticism of art is based. The papers here gathered together, whether +earlier or later than that volume, may be considered as the more +detailed application of those principles to particular artists, to whole +schools and epochs, even, in one case, to the entire history of the +arts. The essay on Raphael, for instance, is little else than an +illustration of the chapter on "Design"; that on Millet illustrates the +three chapters on "The Subject in Art," on "Design," and on "Drawing"; +while "Two Ways of Painting" contrasts, in specific instances, the +classic with the modern point of view.</p> + +<p>But there is another thread connecting these essays, for all of them +will be found to have some bearing, more or less direct, upon the +subject of the title essay. "The Illusion of Progress" elaborates a +point more slightly touched upon in "Artist and Public"; the careers of +Raphael and Millet are capital instances of the happy productiveness of +an artist in sympathy with his public or of the difficulties, nobly +conquered in this case, of an artist without public appreciation; the +greatest merit attributed to "The American School" is an abstention +from the extravagances of those who would make incomprehensibility a +test of greatness. Finally, the work of Saint-Gaudens is a noble example +of art fulfilling its social function in expressing and in elevating the +ideals of its time and country.</p> + +<p>This last essay stands, in some respects, upon a different footing from +the others. It deals with the work and the character of a man I knew and +loved, it was originally written almost immediately after his death, and +it is therefore colored, to some extent, by personal emotion. I have +revised it, rearranged it, and added to it, and I trust that this +coloring may be found to warm, without falsifying, the picture.</p> + +<p>The essay on "The Illusion of Progress" was first printed in "The +Century," that on Saint-Gaudens in "The Atlantic Monthly." The others +originally appeared in "Scribner's Magazine."</p> + +<p class="right"> +KENYON COX.</p> + +<p> +Calder House,<br /> +Croton-on-Hudson,<br /> +June 6, 1914.<br /> +</p> +</div> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>CONTENTS</h2> + + + +<div class='center'> +<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" summary="Contents"> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><small>essay</small></span></td><td align='right'><span class="smcap"><small>page</small></span></td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>I.</td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><a href="#I">Artist and Public</a></span></td><td align='right'>1</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>II.</td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><a href="#II">Jean François Millet</a></span></td><td align='right'>44</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>III.</td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><a href="#III">The Illusion of Progress</a></span></td><td align='right'>77</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>IV.</td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><a href="#IV">Raphael</a></span></td><td align='right'>99</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>V.</td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><a href="#V">Two Ways of Painting</a></span></td><td align='right'>134</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>VI.</td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><a href="#VI">The American School</a></span></td><td align='right'>149</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>VII. </td><td align='left'><span class="smcap"><a href="#VII">Augustus Saint-Gaudens</a> </span></td><td align='right'>169</td></tr> +</table></div> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>ILLUSTRATIONS</h2> + + + +<div class='center'> +<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" summary="Illustrations"> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'><span class="smcap">Millet</span>:</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>1.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p01_t">"The Goose Girl,"</a><i> Saulnier Collection, Bordeaux</i></td><td align='right'><i>Frontispiece</i></td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'> </td><td align='right'><span class="smcap"><small>facing page</small></span></td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>2.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p02_t">"The Sower,"</a><i> Vanderbilt Collection, Metropolitan Museum, New York</i></td><td align='right'>46</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>3.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p03_t">"The Gleaners,"</a><i> The Louvre</i></td><td align='right'>50</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>4.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p04_t">"The Spaders"</a></td><td align='right'>54</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>5.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p05_t">"The Potato Planter,"</a><i> Shaw Collection</i></td><td align='right'>58</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>6.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p06_t">"The Grafter,"</a><i> William Rockefeller Collection</i></td><td align='right'>62</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>7.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p07_t">"The New-Born Calf,"</a><i> Art Institute, Chicago</i></td><td align='right'>66</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>8.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p08_t">"The First Steps,"</a></td><td align='right'>70</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>9.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p09_t">"The Shepherdess,"</a><i> Chauchard Collection, Louvre</i></td><td align='right'>72</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>10.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p10_t">"Spring,"</a><i> The Louvre</i></td><td align='right'>74</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'> </td><td align='right'> </td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'><span class="smcap">Raphael</span>:</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>11.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p11_t">"Poetry,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>112</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>12.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p12_t">"The Judgment of Solomon,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>114</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>13.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p13_t">The "Disputa,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>116</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>14.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p14_t">"The School of Athens,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>118</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>15.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p15_t">"Parnassus,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>120</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>16.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p16_t">"Jurisprudence,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>122</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>17.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p17_t">"The Mass of Bolsena,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>124</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>18.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p18_t">"The Deliverance of Peter,"</a><i> The Vatican</i></td><td align='right'>126</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>19.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p19_t">"The Sibyls,"</a><i> Santa Maria della Pace, Rome</i></td><td align='right'>128</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>20.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p20_t">"Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami,"</a><i> Gardner Collection</i></td><td align='right'>130</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'> </td><td align='right'> </td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'><span class="smcap">John S. Sargent</span>:</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>21.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p21_t">"The Hermit,"</a><i> Metropolitan Museum, New York</i></td><td align='right'>136</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'> </td><td align='right'> </td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'><span class="smcap">Titian</span>:</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>22.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p22_t">"Saint Jerome in the Desert,"</a><i> Brera Gallery, Milan</i></td><td align='right'>142</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'> </td><td align='right'> </td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'> </td><td align='left'><span class="smcap">Saint-Gaudens</span>:</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>23.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p23_t">"Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque"</a></td><td align='right'>182</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>24.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p24_t">"Amor Caritas"</a></td><td align='right'>196</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>25.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p25_t">"The Butler Children"</a></td><td align='right'>206</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>26.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p26_t">"Sarah Redwood Lee"</a></td><td align='right'>208</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>27.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p27_t">"Farragut,"</a><i> Madison Square, New York</i></td><td align='right'>212</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>28.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p28_t">"Lincoln,"</a><i> Chicago, Ill.</i></td><td align='right'>214</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>29.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p29_t">"Deacon Chapin,"</a><i> Springfield, Mass.</i></td><td align='right'>216</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>30.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p30_t">"Adams Memorial,"</a><i> Washington, D.C.</i></td><td align='right'>218</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>31.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p31_t">"Shaw Memorial,"</a><i> Boston, Mass.</i></td><td align='right'>220</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>32.</td><td align='left'><a href="#p32_t">"Sherman,"</a><i> The Plaza, Central Park, New York</i></td><td align='right'>224</td></tr> +</table></div> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>ARTIST AND PUBLIC</h2> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="I" id="I"></a>I</h2> + +<h2>ARTIST AND PUBLIC</h2> + + +<p>In the history of art, as in the history of politics and in the history +of economics, our modern epoch is marked off from all preceding epochs +by one great event, the French Revolution. Fragonard, who survived that +Revolution to lose himself in a new and strange world, is the last at +the old masters; David, some sixteen years his junior, is the first of +the moderns. Now if we look for the most fundamental distinction between +our modern art and the art of past times, I believe we shall find it to +be this: the art of the past was produced for a public that wanted it +and understood it, by artists who understood and sympathized with their +public; the art of our time has been, for the most part, produced for a +public that did not want it and misunderstood it, by artists who +disliked and despised the public for which they worked. When artist and +public were united, art was homogeneous and continuous. Since the +divorce of artist and public art has been chaotic and convulsive.</p> + +<p>That this divorce between the artist and his public—this dislocation of +the right and natural relations between them—has taken place is +certain. The causes of it are many and deep-lying in our modern +civilization, and I can point out only a few of the more obvious ones.</p> + +<p>The first of these is the emergence of a new public. The art of past +ages had been distinctively an aristocratic art, created for kings and +princes, for the free citizens of slave-holding republics, for the +spiritual and intellectual aristocracy of the church, or for a luxurious +and frivolous nobility. As the aim of the Revolution was the +destruction of aristocratic privilege, it is not surprising that a +revolutionary like David should have felt it necessary to destroy the +traditions of an art created for the aristocracy. In his own art of +painting he succeeded so thoroughly that the painters of the next +generation found themselves with no traditions at all. They had not only +to work for a public of enriched bourgeois or proletarians who had never +cared for art, but they had to create over again the art with which they +endeavored to interest this public. How could they succeed? The rift +between artist and public had begun, and it has been widening ever +since.</p> + +<p>If the people had had little to do with the major arts of painting and +sculpture, there had yet been, all through the Middle Ages and the +Renaissance, a truly popular art—an art of furniture making, of +wood-carving, of forging, of pottery. Every craftsman was an artist in +his degree, and every artist was but a craftsman of a superior sort. Our +machine-making, industrial civilization, intent upon material progress +and the satisfaction of material wants, has destroyed this popular art; +and at the same time that the artist lost his patronage from above he +lost his support from below. He has become a superior person, a sort of +demi-gentleman, but he has no longer a splendid nobility to employ him +or a world of artist artisans to surround him and understand him.</p> + +<p>And to the modern artist, so isolated, with no tradition behind him, no +direction from above and no support from below, the art of all times and +all countries has become familiar through modern means of communication +and modern processes of reproduction. Having no compelling reason for +doing one thing rather than another, or for choosing one or another way +of doing things, he is shown a thousand things that he may do and a +thousand ways of doing them. Not clearly knowing his own mind he hears +the clash and reverberation of a thousand other minds, and having no +certainties he must listen to countless theories.</p> + +<p>Mr. Vedder has spoken of a certain "home-made" character which he +considers the greatest defect of his art, the character of an art +belonging to no distinctive school and having no definite relation to +the time and country in which it is produced. But it is not Mr. Vedder's +art alone that is home-made. It is precisely the characteristic note of +our modern art that all of it that is good for anything is home-made or +self-made. Each artist has had to create his art as best he could out of +his own temperament and his own experience—has sat in his corner like a +spider, spinning his web from his own bowels. If the art so created was +essentially fine and noble the public has at last found it out, but only +after years of neglect have embittered the existence and partially +crippled the powers of its creator. And so, to our modern imagination, +the neglected and misunderstood genius has become the very type of the +great artist, and we have allowed our belief in him to color and distort +our vision of the history of art. We have come to look upon the great +artists of all times as an unhappy race struggling against the +inappreciation of a stupid public, starving in garrets and waiting long +for tardy recognition.</p> + +<p>The very reverse of this is true. With the exception of Rembrandt, who +himself lived in a time of political revolution and of the emergence to +power of a burgher class, you will scarce find an unappreciated genius +in the whole history of art until the beginning of the nineteenth +century. The great masters of the Renaissance, from Giotto to Veronese, +were men of their time, sharing and interpreting the ideals of those +around them, and were recognized and patronized as such. Rembrandt's +greatest contemporary, Rubens, was painter in ordinary to half the +courts of Europe, and Velazquez was the friend and companion of his +king. Watteau and Boucher and Fragonard painted for the frivolous +nobility of the eighteenth century just what that nobility wanted, and +even the precursors of the Revolution, sober and honest Chardin, Greuze +the sentimental, had no difficulty in making themselves understood, +until the revolutionist David became dictator to the art of Europe and +swept them into the rubbish heap with the rest.</p> + +<p>It is not until the beginning of what is known as the Romantic movement, +under the Restoration, that the misunderstood painter of genius +definitely appears. Millet, Corot, Rousseau were trying, with +magnificent powers and perfect single-mindedness, to restore the art of +painting which the Revolution had destroyed. They were men of the utmost +nobility and simplicity of character, as far as possible from the +gloomy, fantastic, vain, and egotistical person that we have come to +accept as the type of unappreciated genius; they were classically minded +and conservative, worshippers of the great art of the past; but they +were without a public and they suffered bitter discouragement and long +neglect. Upon their experience is founded that legend of the +unpopularity of all great artists which has grown to astonishing +proportions. Accepting this legend, and believing that all great artists +are misunderstood, the artist has come to cherish a scorn of the public +for which he works and to pretend a greater scorn than he feels. He +cannot believe himself great <i>unless</i> he is misunderstood, and he hugs +his unpopularity to himself as a sign of genius and arrives at that +sublime affectation which answers praise of his work with an exclamation +of dismay: "Is it as bad as that?" He invents new excesses and +eccentricities to insure misunderstanding, and proclaims the doctrine +that, as anything great must be incomprehensible, so anything +incomprehensible must be great. And the public has taken him, at least +partly, at his word. He may or may not be great, but he is certainly +incomprehensible and probably a little mad. Until he succeeds the public +looks upon the artist as a more or less harmless lunatic. When he +succeeds it is willing to exalt him into a kind of god and to worship +his eccentricities as a part of his divinity. So we arrive at a belief +in the insanity of genius. What would Raphael have thought of such a +notion, or that consummate man of the world, Titian? What would the +serene and mighty Veronese have thought of it, or the cool, clear-seeing +Velazquez? How his Excellency the Ambassador of his Most Catholic +Majesty, glorious Peter Paul Rubens, would have laughed!</p> + +<p>It is this lack of sympathy and understanding between the artist and his +public—this fatal isolation of the artist—that is the cause of nearly +all the shortcomings of modern art; of the weakness of what is known as +official or academic art no less than of the extravagance of the art of +opposition. The artist, being no longer a craftsman, working to order, +but a kind of poet, expressing in loneliness his personal emotions, has +lost his natural means of support. Governments, feeling a responsibility +for the cultivation of art which was quite unnecessary in the days when +art was spontaneously produced in answer to a natural demand, have +tried to put an artificial support in its place. That the artist may +show his wares and make himself known, they have created exhibitions; +that he may be encouraged they have instituted medals and prizes; that +he may not starve they have made government purchases. And these +well-meant efforts have resulted in the creation of pictures which have +no other purpose than to hang in exhibitions, to win medals, and to be +purchased by the government and hung in those more permanent exhibitions +which we call museums. For this purpose it is not necessary that a +picture should have great beauty or great sincerity. It <i>is</i> necessary +that it should be large in order to attract attention and sufficiently +well drawn and executed to seem to deserve recognition. And so was +evolved the salon picture, a thing created for no man's pleasure, not +even the artist's; a thing which is neither the decoration of a public +building nor the possible ornament of a private house; a thing which, +after it has served its temporary purpose, is rolled up and stored in a +loft or placed in a gallery where its essential emptiness becomes more +and more evident as time goes on. Such government-encouraged art had at +least the merit of a well-sustained and fairly high level of +accomplishment in the more obvious elements of painting. But as +exhibitions became larger and larger and the competition engendered by +them grew fiercer, it became increasingly difficult to attract attention +by mere academic merit. So the painters began to search for +sensationalism of subject, and the typical salon picture, no longer +decorously pompous, began to deal in blood and horror and sensuality. It +was Regnault who began this sensation hunt, but it has been carried much +further since his day than he can have dreamed of, and the modern salon +picture is not only tiresome but detestable.</p> + +<p>The salon picture, in its merits and its faults, is peculiarly French, +but the modern exhibition has sins to answer for in other countries than +France. In England it has been responsible for a great deal of +sentimentality and anecdotage which has served to attract the attention +of a public that could not be roused to interest in mere painting. +Everywhere, even in this country, where exhibitions are relatively small +and ill-attended, it has caused a certain stridency and blatancy, a +keying up to exhibition pitch, a neglect of finer qualities for the sake +of immediate effectiveness.</p> + +<p>Under our modern conditions the exhibition has become a necessity, and +it would be impossible for our artists to live or to attain a reputation +without it. The giving of medals and prizes and the purchase of works +of art by the state may be of more doubtful utility, though such efforts +at the encouragement of art probably do more good than harm. But there +is one form of government patronage that is almost wholly beneficial, +and that the only form of it which we have in this country—the awarding +of commissions for the decoration of public buildings. The painter of +mural decorations is in the old historical position, in sound and +natural relations to the public. He is doing something which is wanted +and, if he continues to receive commissions, he may fairly assume that +he is doing it in a way that is satisfactory. With the decorative or +monumental sculptor he is almost alone among modern artists in being +relieved of the necessity of producing something in the isolation of his +studio and waiting to see if any one will care for it; of trying, +against the grain, to produce something that he thinks may appeal to +the public because it does not appeal to himself; or of attempting to +bamboozle the public into buying what neither he nor the public really +cares for. If he does his best he may feel that he is as fairly earning +his livelihood as his fellow workmen, the blacksmith and the +stonecutter, and is as little dependent as they upon either charity or +humbug. The best that government has done for art in France is the +commissioning of the great decorative paintings of Baudry and Puvis. In +this country, also, governments, national, State, or municipal, are +patronizing art in the best possible way, and in making buildings +splendid for the people are affording opportunity for the creation of a +truly popular art.</p> + +<p>Without any artificial aid from the government the illustrator has a +wide popular support and works for the public in a normal way; and, +therefore, illustration has been one of the healthiest and most +vigorous forms of modern art. The portrait-painter, too, is producing +something he knows to be wanted, and, though his art has had to fight +against the competition of the photograph and has been partially +vulgarized by the struggle of the exhibitions, it has yet remained, upon +the whole, comprehensible and human; so that much of the soundest art of +the past century has gone into portraiture. It is the painters of +pictures, landscape or genre, who have most suffered from the +misunderstanding between artist and public. Without guidance some of +them have hewed a path to deserved success. Others have wandered into +strange byways and no-thoroughfares.</p> + +<p>The nineteenth century is strewn with the wrecks of such misunderstood +and misunderstanding artists, but it was about the sixties when their +searching for a way began to lead them in certain clearly marked +directions. There are three paths, in especial, which have been followed +since then by adventurous spirits: the paths of æstheticism, of +scientific naturalism, and of pure self-expression; the paths of +Whistler, of Monet, and of Cézanne.</p> + +<p>Whistler was an artist of refined and delicate talent with great +weaknesses both in temperament and training; being also a very clever +man and a brilliant controversialist, he proceeded to erect a theory +which should prove his weaknesses to be so many virtues, and he nearly +succeeded in convincing the world of its validity. Finding the +representation of nature very difficult, he decided that art should not +concern itself with representation but only with the creation of +"arrangements" and "symphonies." Having no interest in the subject of +pictures, he proclaimed that pictures should have no subjects and that +any interest in the subject is vulgar. As he was a cosmopolitan with no +local ties, he maintained that art had never been national; and as he +was out of sympathy with his time, he taught that "art happens" and that +"there never was an artistic period." According to the Whistlerian +gospel, the artist not only has now no point of contact with the public, +but he should not have and never has had any. He has never been a man +among other men, but has been a dreamer "who sat at home with the women" +and made pretty patterns of line and color because they pleased him. And +the only business of the public is to accept "in silence" what he +chooses to give them.</p> + +<p>This kind of rootless art he practised. Some of the patterns he produced +are delightful, but they are without imagination, without passion, +without joy in the material and visible world—the dainty diversions of +a dilettante. One is glad that so gracefully slender an art should +exist, but if it has seemed great art to us it is because our age is so +poor in anything better. To rank its creator with the abounding masters +of the past is an absurdity.</p> + +<p>In their efforts to escape from the dead-alive art of the salon picture, +Monet and the Impressionists took an entirely different course. The +gallery painter's perfunctory treatment of subject bored them, and they +abandoned subject almost as entirely as Whistler had done. The sound if +tame drawing and the mediocre painting of what they called official art +revolted them as it revolted Whistler; but while he nearly suppressed +representation they could see in art nothing but representation. They +wanted to make that representation truer, and they tried to work a +revolution in art by the scientific analysis of light and the +invention of a new method of laying on paint. Instead of joining in +Whistler's search for pure pattern they fixed their attention on facts +alone, or rather on one aspect of the facts, and in their occupation +with light and the manner of representing it they abandoned form almost +as completely as they had abandoned significance and beauty.</p> + +<p>So it happened that Monet could devote some twenty canvases to the study +of the effects of light, at different hours of the day, upon two straw +stacks in his farmyard. It was admirable practice, no doubt, and neither +scientific analysis nor the study of technical methods is to be +despised; but the interest of the public, after all, is in what an +artist does, not in how he learns to do it. The twenty canvases together +formed a sort of demonstration of the possibilities of different kinds +of lighting. Any one of them, taken singly, is but a portrait of two +straw stacks, and the world will not permanently or deeply care about +those straw stacks. The study of light is, in itself, no more an +exercise of the artistic faculties than the study of anatomy or the +study of perspective; and while Impressionism has put a keener edge upon +some of the tools of the artist, it has inevitably failed to produce a +school of art.</p> + +<p>After Impressionism, what? We have no name for it but +Post-Impressionism. Such men as Cézanne, Gauguin, Van Gogh recognized +the sterility of Impressionism and of a narrow æstheticism, while they +shared the hatred of the æsthetes and the Impressionists for the current +art of the salons. No more than the æsthetes or the Impressionists were +they conscious of any social or universal ideals that demanded +expression. The æsthetes had a doctrine; the Impressionists had a method +and a technic. The Post-Impressionists had nothing, and were driven to +the attempt at pure self-expression—to the exaltation of the great god +Whim. They had no training, they recognized no traditions, they spoke to +no public. Each was to express, as he thought best, whatever he happened +to feel or to think, and to invent, as he went along, the language in +which he should express it. I think some of these men had the elements +of genius in them and might have done good work; but their task was a +heart-breaking and a hopeless one. An art cannot be improvised, and an +artist must have some other guide than unregulated emotion. The path +they entered upon had been immemorially marked "no passing"; for many of +them the end of it was suicide or the madhouse.</p> + +<p>But whatever the aberrations of these, the true +Post-Impressionists—whatever the ugliness, the eccentricity, or the +moral dinginess into which they were betrayed—I believe them to have +been, in the main, honest if unbalanced and ill-regulated minds. +Whatever their errors, they paid the price of them in poverty, in +neglect, in death. With those who pretend to be their descendants to-day +the case is different; they are not paying for their eccentricity or +their madness, they are making it pay.</p> + +<p>The enormous engine of modern publicity has been discovered by these +men. They have learned to advertise, and they have found that morbidity, +eccentricity, indecency, extremes of every kind and of any degree are +capital advertisement. If one cannot create a sound and living art, one +can at least make something odd enough to be talked about; if one cannot +achieve enduring fame, one may make sure of a flaming notoriety. And, as +a money-maker, present notoriety is worth more than future fame, for the +speculative dealer is at hand. His interest is in "quick returns" and +he has no wish to wait until you are famous—or dead—before he can sell +anything you do. His process is to buy anything he thinks he can "boom," +to "boom" it as furiously as possible, and to sell it before the "boom" +collapses. Then he will exploit something else, and there's the rub. +Once you have entered this mad race for notoriety, there is no drawing +out of it. The same sensation will not attract attention a second time; +you must be novel at any cost. You must exaggerate your exaggerations +and out-Herod Herod, for others have learned how easy the game is to +play, and are at your heels. It is no longer a matter of +misunderstanding and being misunderstood by the public; it is a matter +of deliberately flouting and outraging the public—of assuming +incomprehensibility and antagonism to popular feeling as signs of +greatness. And so is founded what Frederic Harrison has called the +"shock-your-grandmother school."</p> + +<p>It is with profound regret that one must name as one of the founders of +this school an artist of real power, who has produced much admirable +work—Auguste Rodin. At the age of thirty-seven he attained a sudden and +resounding notoriety, and from that time he has been the most talked-of +artist in Europe. He was a consummate modeller, a magnificent workman, +but he had always grave faults and striking mannerisms. These faults and +mannerisms he has latterly pushed to greater and greater extremes while +neglecting his great gift, each work being more chaotic and fragmentary +in composition, more hideous in type, more affected and emptier in +execution, until he has produced marvels of mushiness and incoherence +hitherto undreamed of and has set up as public monuments fantastically +mutilated figures with broken legs or heads knocked off. Now, in his +old age, he is producing shoals of drawings the most extraordinary of +which few are permitted to see. Some selected specimens of them hang in +a long row in the Metropolitan Museum, and I assure you, upon my word as +a lifelong student of drawing, they are quite as ugly and as silly as +they look. There is not a touch in them that has any truth to nature, +not a line that has real beauty or expressiveness. They represent the +human figure with the structure of a jellyfish and the movement of a +Dutch doll; the human face with an expression I prefer not to +characterize. If they be not the symptoms of mental decay, they can be +nothing but the means of a gigantic mystification.</p> + +<p>With Henri Matisse we have not to deplore the deliquescence of a great +talent, for we have no reason to suppose he ever had any. It is true +that his admirers will assure you he could once draw and paint as +everybody does; what he could <i>not</i> do was to paint enough better than +everybody does to make his mark in the world; and he was a quite +undistinguished person until he found a way to produce some effect upon +his grandmother the public by shocking her into attention. His method is +to choose the ugliest models to be found; to put them into the most +grotesque and indecent postures imaginable; to draw them in the manner +of a savage, or a depraved child, or a worse manner if that be possible; +to surround his figures with blue outlines half an inch wide; and to +paint them in crude and staring colors, brutally laid on in flat masses. +Then, when his grandmother begins to "sit up," she is told with a grave +face that this is a reaction from naturalism, a revival of abstract line +and color, a subjective art which is not the representation of nature +but the expression of the artist's soul. No wonder she gasps and +stares!</p> + +<p>It seemed, two or three years ago, that the limit of mystification had +been reached—that this comedy of errors could not be carried further; +but human ingenuity is inexhaustible, and we now have whole schools, +Cubists, Futurists, and the like, who joyously vie with each other in +the creation of incredible pictures and of irreconcilable and +incomprehensible theories. The public is inclined to lump them all +together and, so far as their work is concerned, the public is not far +wrong; yet in theory Cubism and Futurism are diametrically opposed to +each other. It is not easy to get any clear conception of the doctrines +of these schools, but, so far as I am able to understand them—and I +have taken some pains to do so—they are something like this:</p> + +<p>Cubism is static; Futurism is kinetic. Cubism deals with bulk; Futurism +deals with motion. The Cubist, by a kind of extension of Mr. Berenson's +doctrine of "tactile values," assumes that the only character of objects +which is of importance to the artist is their bulk and solidity—what he +calls their "volumes." Now the form in which volume is most easily +apprehended is the cube; do we not measure by it and speak of the cubic +contents of anything? The inference is easy: reduce all objects to forms +which can be bounded by planes and defined by straight lines and angles; +make their cubic contents measurable to the eye; transform drawing into +a burlesque of solid geometry; and you have, at once, attained to the +highest art. The Futurist, on the other hand, maintains that we know +nothing but that things are in flux. Form, solidity, weight are +illusions. Nothing exists but motion. Everything is changing every +moment, and if anything were still we ourselves are changing. It is, +therefore, absurd to give fixed boundaries to anything or to admit of +any fixed relations in space. If you are trying to record your +impression of a face it is certain that by the time you have done one +eye the other eye will no longer be where it was—it may be at the other +side of the room. You must cut nature into small bits and shuffle them +about wildly if you are to reproduce what we really see.</p> + +<p>Whatever its extravagance, Cubism remains a form of graphic art. However +pedantic and ridiculous its transformation of drawing, it yet recognizes +the existence of drawing. Therefore, to the Futurist, Cubism is +reactionary. What difference does it make, he asks, whether you draw a +head round or square? Why draw a head at all? The Futurist denies the +fundamental postulates of the art of painting. Painting has always, and +by definition, represented upon a surface objects supposed to lie +beyond it and to be seen through it. Futurism pretends to place the +spectator inside the picture and to represent things around him or +behind him as well as those in front of him. Painting has always assumed +the single moment of vision, and, though it has sometimes placed more +than one picture on the same canvas, it has treated each picture as seen +at a specific instant of time. Futurism attempts systematically to +combine the past and the future with the present, as if all the pictures +in a cinematograph film were to be printed one over the other; to paint +no instant but to represent the movement of time. It aims at nothing +less than the abrogation of all recognized laws, the total destruction +of all that has hitherto passed for art.</p> + +<p>Do you recall the story of the man who tried to count a litter of pigs, +but gave it up because one little pig ran about so fast that he could +not be counted? One finds oneself in somewhat the same predicament when +one tries to describe these "new movements" in art. The movement is so +rapid and the men shift their ground so quickly that there is no telling +where to find them. You have no sooner arrived at some notion of the +difference between Cubism and Futurism than you find your Cubist doing +things that are both Cubist and Futurist, or neither Cubist nor +Futurist, according as you look at them. You find things made up of +geometrical figures to give volume, yet with all the parts many times +repeated to give motion. You find things that have neither bulk nor +motion but look like nothing so much as a box of Chinese tangrams +scattered on a table. Finally, you have assemblages of lines that do not +draw anything, even cubes or triangles; and we are assured that there +is now a newest school of all, called Orphism, which, finding still some +vestiges of intelligibility in any assemblage of lines, reduces +everything to shapeless blotches. Probably the first of Orphic pictures +was that produced by the quite authentic donkey who was induced to smear +a canvas by lashing a tail duly dipped in paint. It was given a title as +Orphic as the painting, was accepted by a jury anxious to find new forms +of talent, and was hung in the <i>Salon d'Automne.</i></p> + +<p>In all this welter of preposterous theories there is but one thing +constant—one thing on which all these theorists are agreed. It is that +all this strange stuff is symbolic and shadows forth the impressions and +emotions of the artist: represents not nature but his feeling about +nature; is the expression of his mind or, as they prefer to call it, his +soul. It may be so. All art is symbolic; images are symbols; words are +symbols; all communication is by symbols. But if a symbol is to serve +any purpose of communication between one mind and another it must be a +symbol accepted and understood by both minds. If an artist is to choose +his symbols to suit himself, and to make them mean anything he chooses, +who is to say what he means or whether he means anything? If a man were +to rise and recite, with a solemn voice, words like "Ajakan maradak +tecor sosthendi," would you know what he meant? If he wished you to +believe that these symbols express the feeling of awe caused by the +contemplation of the starry heavens, he would have to tell you so <i>in +your own language</i>; and even then you would have only his word for it. +He may have meant them to express that, but do they? The apologists of +the new schools are continually telling us that we must give the +necessary time and thought to learn the language of these men before we +condemn them. Why should we? Why should not they learn the universal +language of art? It is they who are trying to say something. When they +have learned to speak that language and have convinced us that they have +something to say in it which is worth listening to, then, and not till +then, we may consent to such slight modification of it as may fit it +more closely to their thought.</p> + +<p>If these gentlemen really believe that their capriciously chosen symbols +are fit vehicles for communication with others, why do they fall back on +that old, old symbol, the written word? Why do they introduce, in the +very midst of a design in which everything else is dislocated, a name or +a word in clear Roman letters? Or why do they give their pictures titles +and, lest you should neglect to look in the catalogue, print the title +quite carefully and legibly in the corner of the picture itself? They +know that they must set you to hunting for their announced subject or +you would not look twice at their puzzles.</p> + +<p>Now, there is only one word for this denial of all law, this +insurrection against all custom and tradition, this assertion of +individual license without discipline and without restraint; and that +word is "anarchy." And, as we know, theoretic anarchy, though it may not +always lead to actual violence, is a doctrine of destruction. It is so +in art, and these artistic anarchists are found proclaiming that the +public will never understand or accept their art while anything remains +of the art of the past, and demanding that therefore the art of the past +shall be destroyed. It is actual, physical destruction of pictures and +statues that they call for, and in Italy, that great treasury of the +world's art, has been raised the sinister cry: "Burn the museums!" They +have not yet taken to the torch, but if they were sincere they would do +it; for their doctrine calls for nothing less than the reduction of +mankind to a state of primitive savagery that it may begin again at the +beginning.</p> + +<p>Fortunately, they are not sincere. There may be among them those who +honestly believe in that exaltation of the individual and that revolt +against all law which is the danger of our age. But, for the most part, +if they have broken from the fold and "like sheep have gone astray," +they have shown a very sheep-like disposition to follow the bell-wether. +They are fond of quoting a saying of Gauguin's that "one must be either +a revolutionist or a plagiary"; but can any one tell these +revolutionists apart? Can any one distinguish among them such definite +and logically developed personalities as mark even schoolmen and +"plagiarists" like Meissonier and Gérôme? If any one of these men stood +alone, one might believe his eccentricities to be the mark of an extreme +individuality; one cannot believe it when one finds the same +eccentricities in twenty of them.</p> + +<p>No, it is not for the sake of unhampered personal development that young +artists are joining these new schools; it is because they are offered a +short cut to a kind of success. As there are no more laws and no more +standards, there is nothing to learn. The merest student is at once set +upon a level with the most experienced of his instructors, and boys and +girls in their teens are hailed as masters. Art is at last made easy, +and there are no longer any pupils, for all have become teachers. To +borrow Doctor Johnson's phrase, "many men, many women, and many +children" could produce art after this fashion; and they do.</p> + +<p>So right are the practitioners of this puerile art in their proclaimed +belief that the public will never accept it while anything else exists, +that one might be willing to treat it with the silent contempt it +deserves were it not for the efforts of certain critics and writers for +the press to convince us that it ought to be accepted. Some of these men +seem to be intimidated by the blunders of the past. Knowing that +contemporary criticism has damned almost every true artist of the +nineteenth century, they are determined not to be caught napping; and +they join in shouts of applause as each new harlequin steps upon the +stage. They forget that it is as dangerous to praise ignorantly as to +blame unjustly, and that the railer at genius, though he may seem more +malevolent, will scarce appear so ridiculous to posterity as the dupe of +the mountebank. Others of them are, no doubt, honest victims of that +illusion of progress to which we are all more or less subject—to that +ingrained belief that all evolution is upward and that the latest thing +must necessarily be the best. They forget that the same process which +has relieved man of his tail has deprived the snake of his legs and the +kiwi of his wings. They forget that art has never been and cannot be +continuously progressive; that it is only the sciences connected with +art that are capable of progress; and that the "Henriade" is not a +greater poem than the "Divine Comedy" because Voltaire has learned the +falsity of the Ptolemaic astronomy. Finally, these writers, like other +people, desire to seem knowing and clever; and if you appear to admire +vastly what no one else understands you pass for a clever man.</p> + +<p>I have looked through a good deal of the writings of these "up-to-date" +critics in the effort to find something like an intelligible argument +or a definite statement of belief. I have found nothing but the +continually repeated assumption that these new movements, in all their +varieties, are "living" and "vital." I can find no grounds stated for +this assumption and can suppose only that what is changing with great +rapidity is conceived to be alive; yet I know nothing more productive of +rapid changes than putrefaction.</p> + +<p>Do not be deceived. This is not vital art, it is decadent and corrupt. +True art has always been the expression by the artist of the ideals of +his time and of the world in which he lived—ideals which were his own +because he was a part of that world. A living and healthy art never has +existed and never can exist except through the mutual understanding and +co-operation of the artist and his public. Art is made for man and has a +social function to perform. We have a right to demand that it shall be +both human and humane; that it shall show some sympathy in the artist +with our thoughts and our feelings; that it shall interpret our ideals +to us in that universal language which has grown up in the course of +ages. We have a right to reject with pity or with scorn the stammerings +of incompetence, the babble of lunacy, or the vaporing of imposture. But +mutual understanding implies a duty on the part of the public as well as +on the part of the artist, and we must give as well as take. We must be +at the pains to learn something of the language of art in which we bid +the artist speak. If we would have beauty from him we must sympathize +with his aspiration for beauty. Above all, if we would have him +interpret for us our ideals we must have ideals worthy of such +interpretation. Without this co-operation on our part we may have a +better art than we deserve, for noble artists will be born, and they +will give us an art noble in its essence however mutilated and shorn of +its effectiveness by our neglect. It is only by being worthy of it that +we can hope to have an art we may be proud of—an art lofty in its +inspiration, consummate in its achievement, disciplined in its strength.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="II" id="II"></a>II</h2> + +<h2>JEAN FRANÇOIS MILLET</h2> + + +<p>Jean François Millet, who lived hard and died poor, is now perhaps the +most famous artist of the nineteenth century. His slightest work is +fought for by dealers and collectors, and his more important pictures, +if they chance to change hands, bring colossal and almost incredible +prices. And of all modern reputations his, so far as we can see, seems +most likely to be enduring. If any painter of the immediate past is +definitively numbered with the great masters, it is he. Yet the popular +admiration for his art is based on a I misapprehension almost as +profound as that of those contemporaries who decried and opposed him. +They thought him violent, rude, ill-educated, a "man of the woods," a +revolutionist, almost a communist. We are apt to think of him as a +gentle sentimentalist, a soul full of compassion for the hard lot of the +poor, a man whose art achieves greatness by sheer feeling rather than by +knowledge and intellect. In spite of his own letters, in spite of the +testimony of many who knew him well, in spite of more than one piece of +illuminating criticism, these two misconceptions endure; and, for the +many, Millet is still either the painter of "The Man with the Hoe," a +powerful but somewhat exceptional work, or the painter of "L'Angelus," +precisely the least characteristic picture he ever produced. There is a +legendary Millet, in many ways a very different man from the real one, +and, while the facts of his life are well known and undisputed, the +interpretation of them is colored by preconceptions and strained to make +them fit the legend.</p> + +<p>Altogether too much, for instance, has been made of the fact that +Millet was born a peasant. He was so, but so were half the artists and +poets who come up to Paris and fill the schools and the cafés of the +student quarters. To any one who has known these young <i>rapins</i>, and +wondered at the grave and distinguished members of the Institute into +which many of them have afterward developed, it is evident that this +studious youth—who read Virgil in the original and Homer and +Shakespeare and Goethe in translations—probably had a much more +cultivated mind and a much sounder education than most of his fellow +students under Delaroche. Seven years after this Norman farmer's son +came to Paris, with a pension of 600 francs voted by the town council of +Cherbourg, the son of a Breton sabot-maker followed him there with a +precisely similar pension voted by the town council of Roche-sur-Yon; +and the pupil of Langlois had had at least equal opportunities with +the pupil of Sartoris. Both cases were entirely typical of French +methods of encouraging the fine arts, and the peasant origin of Millet +is precisely as significant as the peasant origin of Baudry.</p> + +<p><a name="p02_t" id="p02_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 238px;"> + +<a href="images/p02.jpg"> +<img src="images/p02_t.jpg" width="238" height="300" +alt="Plate 2.—Millet. "The Sower." In the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vanderbilt collection." +title="Plate 2.—Millet. "The Sower." In the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vanderbilt collection." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 2.—Millet. "The Sower." In the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vanderbilt collection.</span> +</div> + +<p>Baudry persevered in the course marked out for him and, after failing +three times, received the <i>Prix de Rome</i> and became the pensioner of the +state. Millet took umbrage at Delaroche's explanation that his support +was already pledged to another candidate for the prize, and left the +<i>atelier</i> of that master after little more than a year's work. But that +he had already acquired most of what was to be learned there is shown, +if by nothing else, by the master's promise to push him for the prize +the year following. This was in 1838, and for a year or two longer +Millet worked in the life classes of Suisse and Boudin without a master. +His pension was first cut down and then withdrawn altogether, and he +was thrown upon his own resources. His struggles and his poverty during +the next few years were those of many a young artist, aggravated, in his +case, by two imprudent marriages. But during all the time that he was +painting portraits in Cherbourg or little nudes in Paris he was steadily +gaining reputation and making friends. If we had not the pictures +themselves to show us how able and how well-trained a workman he was, +the story told us by Wyatt Eaton, in "Modern French Masters," would +convince us. It was in the last year of Millet's life that he told the +young American how, in his early days, a dealer would come to him for a +picture and, "having nothing painted, he would offer the dealer a book +and ask him to wait for a little while that he might add a few touches +to the picture." He would then go into his studio and take a fresh +canvas, or a panel, and in two hours bring out a little nude figure, +which he had painted during that time, and for which he would receive +twenty or twenty-five francs. It was the work of this time that Diaz +admired for its color and its "immortal flesh painting"; that caused +Guichard, a pupil of Ingres, to tell his master that Millet was the +finest draughtsman of the new school; that earned for its author the +title of "master of the nude."</p> + +<p>He did all kinds of work in these days, even painting signs and +illustrating sheet music, and it was all capital practice for a young +man, but it was not what he wanted to do. A great deal has been made of +the story of his overhearing some one speak of him as "a fellow who +never paints anything but naked women," and he is represented as +undergoing something like a sudden conversion and as resolving to "do no +more of the devil's work." As a matter of fact, he had, from the +first, wanted to paint "men at work in the fields," with their "fine +attitudes," and he only tried his hand at other things because he had +his living to earn. Sensier saw what seems to have been the first sketch +for "The Sower" as early as 1847, and it existed long before that, while +"The Winnower" was exhibited in 1848; and the overheard conversation is +said to have taken place in 1849. There was nothing indecent or immoral +in Millet's early work, and the best proof that he felt no moral +reprobation for the painting of the nude—as what true painter, +especially in France, ever did?—is that he returned to it in the height +of his power and, in the picture of the little "Goose Girl" (Pl. 1) by +the brook side, her slim, young body bared for the bath, produced the +loveliest of his works. No, what happened to Millet in 1849 was simply +that he resolved to do no more pot-boiling, to consult no one's taste +but his own, to paint what he pleased and as he pleased, if he starved +for it. He went to Barbizon for a summer's holiday and to escape the +cholera. He stayed there because living was cheap and the place was +healthful, and because he could find there the models and the subjects +on which he built his highly abstract and ideal art.</p> + +<p><a name="p03_t" id="p03_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p03.jpg"> +<img src="images/p03_t.jpg" width="320" height="239" alt="Plate 3.—Millet. "The Gleaners." In the Louvre." title="Plate 3.—Millet. "The Gleaners."In the Louvre." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 3.—Millet. "The Gleaners." In the Louvre.</span> +</div> + +<p>At Barbizon he neither resumed the costume nor led the life of a +peasant. He wore sabots, as hundreds of other artists have done, before +and since, when living in the country in France. Sabots are very cheap +and very dry and not uncomfortable when you have acquired the knack of +wearing them. In other respects he dressed and lived like a small +bourgeois, and was <i>monsieur</i> to the people about him. Barbizon was +already a summer resort for artists before he came there, and the inn +was full of painters; while others, of whom Rousseau was one, were +settled there more or less permanently. It is but a short distance from +Paris, and the exhibitions and museums were readily accessible. The life +that Millet lived there was that of many poor, self-respecting, +hard-working artists, and if he had been a landscape painter that life +would never have seemed in any way exceptional. It is only because he +was a painter of the figure that it seems odd he should have lived in +the country; only because he painted peasants that he has been thought +of as a peasant himself. If he accepted the name, with a kind of pride, +it was in protest against the frivolity and artificiality of the +fashionable art of the day. But if too much has been made of Millet's +peasant origin, perhaps hardly enough has been made of his race. It is +at least interesting that the two Frenchmen whose art has most in +common with his, Nicolas Poussin and Pierre Corneille, should have been +Normans like himself. In the severely restrained, grandly simple, +profoundly classical work of these three men, that hard-headed, +strong-handed, austere, and manly race has found its artistic +expression.</p> + +<p>For Millet is neither a revolutionary nor a sentimentalist, nor even a +romanticist; he is essentially a classicist of the classicists, a +conservative of the conservatives, the one modern exemplar of the grand +style. It is because his art is so old that it was "too new" for even +Corot to understand it; because he harked back beyond the +pseudoclassicism of his time to the great art of the past, and was +classic as Phidias and Giotto and Michelangelo were classic, that he +seemed strange to his contemporaries. In everything he was conservative. +He hated change; he wanted things to remain as they had always been. He +did not especially pity the hard lot of the peasant; he considered it +the natural and inevitable lot of man who "eats bread in the sweat of +his brow." He wanted the people he painted "to look as if they belonged +to their place—as if it would be impossible for them ever to think of +being anything else but what they are." In the herdsman and the +shepherd, the sower and the reaper, he saw the immemorial types of +humanity whose labors have endured since the world began and were +essentially what they now are when Virgil wrote his "Georgics" and when +Jacob kept the flocks of Laban. This is the note of all his work. It is +the permanent, the essential, the eternally significant that he paints. +The apparent localization of his subjects in time and place is an +illusion. He is not concerned with the nineteenth century or with +Barbizon but with mankind. At the very moment when the English +Pre-raphaelites were trying to found a great art on the exhaustive +imitation of natural detail, he eliminated detail as much as possible. +At the very beginning of our modern preoccupation with the direct +representation of facts, he abandoned study from the model almost +entirely and could say that he "had never painted from nature." His +subjects would have struck the amiable Sir Joshua as trivial, yet no one +has ever more completely followed that writer's precepts. His confession +of faith is in the words, "One must be able to make use of the trivial +for the expression of the sublime"; and this painter of "rustic genre" +is the world's greatest master of the sublime after Michelangelo.</p> + +<p><a name="p04_t" id="p04_t"></a></p> + +<div class="figright" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p04.jpg"> +<img src="images/p04_t.jpg" width="320" height="225" +alt="Plate 4.—Millet. "The Spaders."" +title="Plate 4.—Millet. "The Spaders."" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 4.—Millet. "The Spaders."</span> +</div> + +<p>The comparison with Michelangelo is inevitable and has been made again +and again by those who have felt the elemental grandeur of Millet's +work. As a recent writer has remarked: "An art highly intellectualized, +so as to convey a great idea with the lucidity of language, must needs +be controlled by genius akin to that which inspired the ceiling +paintings of the Sistine Chapel."<a name="FNanchor_A_1" id="FNanchor_A_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_A_1" class="fnanchor">[A]</a> This was written of the Trajanic +sculptors, whose works both Michelangelo and Millet studied and admired, +and indeed it is to this old Roman art, or to the still older art of +Greece, that one must go for the truest parallel of Millet's temper and +his manner of working. He was less impatient, less romantic and +emotional than Michelangelo; he was graver, quieter, more serene; and if +he had little of the Greek sensuousness and the Greek love of physical +beauty, he had much of the antique clarity and simplicity. To express +his idea clearly, logically, and forcibly; to make a work of art that +should be "all of a piece" and in which "things should be where they +are for a purpose"; to admit nothing for display, for ornament, even for +beauty, that did not necessarily and inevitably grow out of his central +theme, and to suppress with an iron rigidity everything useless or +superfluous—this was his constant and conscious effort. It is an ideal +eminently austere and intellectual—an ideal, above all, especially and +eternally classic.</p> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_A_1" id="Footnote_A_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_A_1"><span class="label">[A]</span></a> Eugénie Strong, "Roman Sculpture," p. 224.</p></div> + +<p>Take, for an instance, the earliest of his masterpieces, the first great +picture by which he marked his emancipation and his determination +henceforth to produce art as he understood it without regard to the +preferences of others. Many of his preliminary drawings and studies +exist and we can trace, more or less clearly, the process by which the +final result was arrived at. At first we have merely a peasant sowing +grain; an everyday incident, truly enough observed but nothing more. +Gradually the background is cut down, the space restricted, the figure +enlarged until it fills its frame as a metope of the Parthenon is +filled. The gesture is ever enlarged and given more sweep and majesty, +the silhouette is simplified and divested of all accidental or +insignificant detail. A thousand previous observations are compared and +resumed in one general and comprehensive formula, and the typical has +been evolved from the actual. What generations of Greek sculptors did in +their slow perfectioning of certain fixed types he has done almost at +once. We have no longer a man sowing, but "The Sower" (Pl. 2), +justifying the title he instinctively gave it by its air of permanence, +of inevitability, of universality. All the significance which there is +or ever has been for mankind in that primæval action of sowing the seed +is crystallized into its necessary expression. The thing is done once +for all, and need never—can never be done again. Has any one else +had this power since Michelangelo created his "Adam"?</p> + +<p><a name="p05_t" id="p05_t"></a></p> + +<div class="figleft" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p05.jpg"> +<img src="images/p05_t.jpg" width="320" height="251" +alt="Plate 5.—Millet. "The Potato Planters." In the Quincy A. Shaw Collection." +title="Plate 5.—Millet. "The Potato Planters." In the Quincy A. Shaw Collection." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 5.—Millet. "The Potato Planters." In the Quincy A. Shaw Collection.</span> +</div> + +<p>If even Millet never again attained quite the august impressiveness of +this picture it is because no other action of rustic man has so wide or +so deep a meaning for us as this of sowing. All the meaning there is in +an action he could make us feel with entire certainty, and always he +proceeds by this method of elimination, concentration, simplification, +insistence on the essential and the essential only. One of the most +perfect of all his pictures—more perfect than "The Sower" on account of +qualities of mere painting, of color, and of the rendering of landscape, +of which I shall speak later—is "The Gleaners" (Pl. 3). Here one figure +is not enough to express the continuousness of the movement; the utmost +simplification will not make you feel, as powerfully as he wishes you to +feel it, the crawling progress, the bending together of back and +thighs, the groping of worn fingers in the stubble. The line must be +reinforced and reduplicated, and a second figure, almost a facsimile of +the first, is added. Even this is not enough. He adds a third figure, +not gathering the ear, but about to do so, standing, but stooped forward +and bounded by one great, almost uninterrupted curve from the peak of +the cap over her eyes to the heel which half slips out of the sabot, and +the thing is done. The whole day's work is resumed in that one moment. +The task has endured for hours and will endure till sunset, with only an +occasional break while the back is half-straightened—there is not time +to straighten it wholly. It is the triumph of significant composition, +as "The Sower" is the triumph of significant draughtsmanship.</p> + +<p>Or, when an action is more complicated and difficult of suggestion, as +is that, for instance, of digging, he takes it at the beginning and at +the end, as in "The Spaders" (Pl. 4), and makes you understand +everything between. One man is doubled over his spade, his whole weight +brought to bear on the pressing foot which drives the blade into the +ground. The other, with arms outstretched, gives the twisting motion +which lets the loosened earth fall where it is to lie. Each of these +positions is so thoroughly understood and so definitely expressed that +all the other positions of the action are implied in them. You feel the +recurrent rhythm of the movement and could almost count the falling of +the clods.</p> + +<p>So far did Millet push the elimination of non-essentials that his heads +have often scarcely any features, his hands, one might say, are without +fingers, and his draperies are so simplified as to suggest the witty +remark that his peasants are too poor to afford any folds in their +garments. The setting of the great, bony planes of jaw and cheek and +temple, the bulk and solidity of the skull, and the direction of the +face—these were, often enough, all he wanted of a head. Look at the +hand of the woman in "The Potato Planters" (Pl. 5), or at those of the +man in the same picture, and see how little detail there is in them, yet +how surely the master's sovereign draughtsmanship has made you feel +their actual structure and function! And how inevitably the garments, +with their few and simple folds, mould and accent the figures beneath +them, "becoming, as it were, a part of the body and expressing, even +more than the nude, the larger and simpler forms of nature"! How +explicitly the action of the bodies is registered, how perfectly the +amount of effort apparent is proportioned to the end to be attained! One +can feel, to an ounce, it seems, the strain upon the muscles implied by +that hoe-full of earth. Or look at the easier attitude of "The +Grafter" (Pl. 6), engaged upon his gentler task, and at the monumental +silhouette of the wife, standing there, babe in arms, a type of eternal +motherhood and of the fruitfulness to come.</p> + +<p><a name="p06_t" id="p06_t"></a></p> + +<div class="figright" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p06.jpg"> +<img src="images/p06_t.jpg" width="320" height="257" +alt="Plate 6.—Millet. "The Grafter." In the collection of William Rockefeller." +title="Plate 6.—Millet. "The Grafter." In the collection of William Rockefeller." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 6.—Millet. "The Grafter." In the collection of William Rockefeller.</span> +</div> + +<p>Oftener than anything, perhaps, it was the sense of weight that +interested Millet. It is the adjustment of her body to the weight of the +child she carries that gives her statuesque pose to the wife of the +grafter. It is the drag of the buckets upon the arms that gives her +whole character to the magnificent "Woman Carrying Water," in the +Vanderbilt collection. It is the erect carriage, the cautious, rhythmic +walk, keeping step together, forced upon them by the sense of weight, +which gives that gravity and solemnity to the bearers of "The New-Born +Calf" (Pl. 7), which was ridiculed by Millet's critics as more befitting +the bearers of the bull Apis or the Holy Sacrament. The artist himself +was explicit in this instance as in that of the "Woman Carrying Water." +"The expression of two men carrying a load on a litter," he says, +"naturally depends on the weight which rests upon their arms. Thus, if +the weight is equal, their expression will be the same, whether they +bear the Ark of the Covenant or a calf, an ingot of gold or a stone." +Find that expression, whether in face or figure, render it clearly, +"with largeness and simplicity," and you have a great, a grave, a +classic work of art. "We are never so truly Greek," he said, "as when we +are simply painting our own impressions." Certainly his own way of +painting his impressions was more Greek than anything else in the whole +range of modern art.</p> + +<p>In the epic grandeur of such pictures as these there is something akin +to sadness, though assuredly Millet did not mean them to be sad. Did he +not say of the "Woman Carrying Water": "I have avoided, as I always do, +with a sort of horror, everything that might verge on the sentimental"? +He wished her to seem "to do her work simply and cheerfully ... as a +part of her daily task and the habit of her life." And he was not always +in the austere and epical mood. He could be idyllic as well, and if he +could not see "the joyous side" of life or nature he could feel and make +us feel the charm of tranquillity. Indeed, this remark of his about the +joyous side of things was made in the dark, early days when life was +hardest for him. He broadened in his view as he grew older and +conditions became more tolerable, and he has painted a whole series of +little pictures of family life and of childhood that, in their smiling +seriousness, are endlessly delightful. The same science, the same +thoughtfulness, the same concentration and intellectual grasp that +defined for us the superb gesture of "The Sower" have gone to the +depiction of the adorable uncertainty, between walking and falling, of +those "First Steps" (Pl. 8) from the mother's lap to the outstretched +arms of the father; and the result, in this case as in the other, is a +thing perfectly and permanently expressed. Whatever Millet has done is +done. He has "characterized the type," as it was his dream to do, and +written "hands off" across his subject for all future adventurers.</p> + +<p>Finally, he rises to an almost lyric fervor in that picture of the +little "Goose Girl" bathing, which is one of the most purely and +exquisitely beautiful things in art. In this smooth, young body +quivering with anticipation of the coolness of the water; in these +rounded, slender limbs with their long, firm, supple lines; in the +unconscious, half-awkward grace of attitude and in the glory of +sunlight splashing through the shadow of the willows, there is a whole +song of joy and youth and the goodness of the world. The picture exists +in a drawing or pastel, which has been photographed by Braun, as well as +in the oil-painting, and Millet's habit of returning again and again to +a favorite subject renders it difficult to be certain which is the +earlier of the two; but I imagine this drawing to be a study for the +picture. At first sight the figure in it is more obviously beautiful +than in the other version, and it is only after a time that one begins +to understand the changes that the artist was impelled to make. It is +almost too graceful, too much like an antique nymph. No one could find +any fault with it, but by an almost imperceptible stiffening of the line +here and there, a little greater turn of the foot upon the ankle and of +the hand upon the wrist, the figure in the painting has been given an +accent of rusticity that makes it more human, more natural, and more +appealing. She is no longer a possible Galatea or Arethusa, she is only +a goose girl, and we feel but the more strongly on that account the +eternal poem of the healthy human form.</p> + +<p><a name="p07_t" id="p07_t"></a></p> + +<div class="figleft" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p07.jpg"> +<img src="images/p07_t.jpg" width="320" height="254" +alt="Plate 7.—Millet. "The New-Born Calf." In the Art Institute, Chicago." +title="Plate 7.—Millet. "The New-Born Calf." In the Art Institute, Chicago." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 7.—Millet. "The New-Born Calf." In the Art Institute, Chicago.</span> +</div> + +<p>The especial study of the nineteenth century was landscape, and Millet +was so far a man of his time that he was a great landscape painter; but +his treatment of landscape was unlike any other, and, like his own +treatment of the figure, in its insistence on essentials, its +elimination of the accidental, its austere and grand simplicity. I have +heard, somewhere, a story of his saying, in answer to praise of his work +or inquiry as to his meaning: "I was trying to express the difference +between the things that lie flat and the things that stand upright." +That is the real motive of one of his masterpieces—one that in some +moods seems the greatest of them all—"The Shepherdess" (Pl. 9), that +is, or used to be, in the Chauchard collection. In this nobly tranquil +work, in which there is no hint of sadness or revolt, are to be found +all his usual inevitableness of composition and perfection of +draughtsmanship—note the effect of repetition in the sheep, "forty +feeding like one"—but the glory of the picture is in the infinite +recession of the plain that lies flat, the exact notation of the +successive positions upon it of the things that stand upright, from the +trees and the hay wain in the extreme distance, almost lost in sky, +through the sheep and the sheep-dog and the shepherdess herself, +knitting so quietly, to the dandelions in the foreground, each with its +"aureole" of light. Of these simple, geometrical relations, and of the +enveloping light and air by which they are expressed, he has made a hymn +of praise.</p> + +<p>The background of "The Gleaners," with its baking stubble-field under +the midday sun, its grain stacks and laborers and distant farmstead, all +tremulous in the reflected waves of heat, indistinct and almost +indecipherable yet unmistakable, is nearly as wonderful; and no one has +ever so rendered the solemnity and the mystery of night as has he in the +marvellous "Sheepfold" of the Walters collection. But the greatest of +all his landscapes—one of the greatest landscapes ever painted—is his +"Spring" (Pl. 10), of the Louvre, a pure landscape this time, containing +no figure. In the intense green of the sunlit woods against the black +rain-clouds that are passing away, in the jewel-like brilliancy of the +blossoming apple-trees, and the wet grass in that clear air after the +shower; in the glorious rainbow drawn in dancing light across the sky, +we may see, if anywhere in art, some reflection of the "infinite +splendors" which Millet tells us he saw in nature.</p> + +<p><a name="p08_t" id="p08_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p08.jpg"> +<img src="images/p08_t.jpg" width="320" height="206" +alt="Plate 8.—Millet. "The First Steps."" +title="Plate 8.—Millet. "The First Steps."" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 8.—Millet. "The First Steps."</span> +</div> + +<p>In the face of such results as these it seems absurd to discuss the +question whether or not Millet was technically a master of his trade, as +if the methods that produced them could possibly be anything but good +methods for the purpose; but it is still too much the fashion to say and +think that the great artist was a poor painter—to speak slightingly of +his accomplishment in oil-painting and to seem to prefer his drawings +and pastels to his pictures. We have seen that he was a supremely able +technician in his pot-boiling days and that the color and handling of +his early pictures were greatly admired by so brilliant a virtuoso as +Diaz. But this "flowery manner" would not lend itself to the expression +of his new aims and he had to invent another. He did so stumblingly at +first, and the earliest pictures of his grand style have a certain +harshness and ruggedness of surface and heaviness of color which his +critics could not forgive any more than the Impressionists, who have +outdone that ruggedness, can forgive him his frequent use of a warm +general tone inclining to brownness. His ideal of form and of +composition he possessed complete from the beginning; his mastery of +light and color and the handling of materials was slower of acquirement; +but he did acquire it, and in the end he is as absolute a master of +painting as of drawing. He did not see nature in blue and violet, as +Monet has taught us to see it, and little felicities and facilities of +rendering, and anything approaching cleverness or the parade of +virtuosity he hated; but he knew just what could be done with thick or +thin painting, with opaque or transparent pigment, and he could make his +few and simple colors say anything he chose. In his mature work there is +a profound knowledge of the means to be employed and a great economy +in their use, and there is no approach to indiscriminate or meaningless +loading. "Things are where they are for a purpose," and if the surface +of a picture is rough in any place it is because just that degree of +roughness was necessary to attain the desired effect. He could make mere +paint express light as few artists have been able to do—"The +Shepherdess" is flooded with it—and he could do this without any +sacrifice of the sense of substance in the things on which the light +falls. If some of his canvases are brown it is because brown seemed to +him the appropriate note to express what he had to say; "The Gleaners" +glows with almost the richness of a Giorgione, and other pictures are +honey-toned or cool and silvery or splendidly brilliant. And in whatever +key he painted, the harmony of his tones and colors is as large, as +simple, and as perfect as the harmony of his lines and masses.</p> + +<p><a name="p09_t" id="p09_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p09.jpg"> +<img src="images/p09_t.jpg" width="320" height="263" +alt="Plate 9.—Millet. "The Shepherdess." In the Chauchard collection, Louvre." +title="Plate 9.—Millet. "The Shepherdess." In the Chauchard collection, Louvre." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 9.—Millet. "The Shepherdess." In the Chauchard collection, Louvre.</span> +</div> + +<p>But if we cannot admit that Millet's drawings are better than his +paintings, we may be very glad he did them. His great epic of the soil +must have lacked many episodes, perhaps whole books and cantos, if it +had been written only in the slower and more elaborate method. The +comparative slightness and rapidity of execution of his drawings and +pastels enabled him to register many inventions and observations that we +must otherwise have missed, and many of these are of the highest value. +His long training in seizing the essential in anything he saw enabled +him, often, to put more meaning into a single rapid line than another +could put into a day's painful labor, and some of his slightest sketches +are astonishingly and commandingly expressive. Other of his drawings +were worked out and pondered over almost as lovingly as his completest +pictures. But so instinctively and inevitably was he a composer that +everything he touched is a complete whole—his merest sketch or his most +elaborated design is a unit. He has left no fragments. His paintings, +his countless drawings, his few etchings and woodcuts are all of a +piece. About everything there is that air of finality which marks the +work destined to become permanently a classic.</p> + +<p><a name="p10_t" id="p10_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p10.jpg"> +<img src="images/p10_t.jpg" width="320" height="229" +alt="Plate 10.—Millet. "Spring." In the Louvre." +title="Plate 10.—Millet. "Spring." In the Louvre." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 10.—Millet. "Spring." In the Louvre.</span> +</div> + +<p>Here and there, by one or another writer, most or all of what I have +been trying to say has been said already. It is the more likely to be +true. And if these true things have been said, many other things have +been said also which seem to me not so true, or little to the purpose, +so that the image I have been trying to create must differ, for better +or for worse, from that which another might have made. At least I may +have looked at the truth from a slightly different angle and so have +shown it in a new perspective. And, at any rate, it is well that true +things should be said again from time to time. It can do no harm that +one more person should endeavor to give a reason for his admiration of a +great and true artist and should express his conviction that among the +world's great masters the final place of Jean François Millet is not +destined to be the lowest.</p> + + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="III" id="III"></a>III</h2> + +<h2>THE ILLUSION OF PROGRESS<a name="FNanchor_B_2" id="FNanchor_B_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_B_2" class="fnanchor">[B]</a></h2> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_B_2" id="Footnote_B_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_B_2"><span class="label">[B]</span></a> Read before the joint meeting of The American Academy of +Arts and Letters and The National Institute of Arts and Letters, +December 13, 1912.</p></div> + + +<p>In these days all of us, even Academicians, are to some extent believers +in progress. Our golden age is no longer in the past, but in the future. +We know that our early ancestors were a race of wretched cave-dwellers, +and we believe that our still earlier ancestors were possessed of tails +and pointed ears. Having come so far, we are sometimes inclined to +forget that not every step has been an advance and to entertain an +illogical confidence that each future step must carry us still further +forward; having indubitably progressed in many things, we think of +ourselves as progressing in all. And as the pace of progress in science +and in material things has become more and more rapid, we have come to +expect a similar pace in art and letters, to imagine that the art of the +future must be far finer than the art of the present or than that of the +past, and that the art of one decade, or even of one year, must +supersede that of the preceding decade or the preceding year, as the +1913 model in automobiles supersedes the model of 1912. More than ever +before "To have done is to hang quite out of fashion," and the only +title to consideration is to do something quite obviously new or to +proclaim one's intention of doing something newer. The race grows madder +and madder. It was scarce two years since we first heard of "Cubism" +when the "Futurists" were calling the "Cubists" reactionary. Even the +gasping critics, pounding manfully in the rear, have thrown away all +impedimenta of traditional standards in the desperate effort to keep up +with what seems less a march than a stampede.</p> + +<p>But while we talk so loudly of progress in the arts we have an uneasy +feeling that we are not really progressing. If our belief in our own art +were as full-blooded as was that of the great creative epochs, we should +scarce be so reverent of the art of the past. It is, perhaps, a sign of +anæmia that we have become founders of museums and conservers of old +buildings. If we are so careful of our heritage, it is surely from some +doubt of our ability to replace it. When art has been vigorously alive +it has been ruthless in its treatment of what has gone before. No +cathedral builder thought of reconciling his own work to that of the +builder who preceded him; he built in his own way, confident of its +superiority. And when the Renaissance builder came, in his turn, he +contemptuously dismissed all mediæval art as "Gothic" and barbarous, and +was as ready to tear down an old façade as to build a new one. Even the +most cock-sure of our moderns might hesitate to emulate Michelangelo in +his calm destruction of three frescoes by Perugino to make room for his +own "Last Judgment." He, at least, had the full courage of his +convictions, and his opinion of Perugino is of record.</p> + +<p>Not all of us would consider even Michelangelo's arrogance entirely +justified, but it is not only the Michelangelos who have had this belief +in themselves. Apparently the confidence of progress has been as great +in times that now seem to us decadent as in times that we think of as +truly progressive. The past, or at least the immediate past, has always +seemed "out of date," and each generation, as it made its entrance on +the stage, has plumed itself upon its superiority to that which was +leaving it. The architect of the most debased baroque grafted his +"improvements" upon the buildings of the high Renaissance with an +assurance not less than that with which David and his contemporaries +banished the whole charming art of the eighteenth century. Van Orley and +Frans Floris were as sure of their advance upon the ancient Flemish +painting of the Van Eycks and of Memling as Rubens himself must have +been of his advance upon them.</p> + +<p>We can see plainly enough that in at least some of these cases the sense +of progress was an illusion. There was movement, but it was not always +forward movement. And if progress was illusory in some instances, may it +not, possibly, have been so in all? It is at least worth inquiry how far +the fine arts have ever been in a state of true progress, going forward +regularly from good to better, each generation building on the work of +its predecessors and surpassing that work, in the way in which science +has normally progressed when material conditions were favorable.</p> + +<p>If, with a view to answering this question, we examine, however +cursorily, the history of the five great arts, we shall find a somewhat +different state of affairs in the case of each. In the end it may be +possible to formulate something like a general rule that shall accord +with all the facts. Let us begin with the greatest and simplest of the +arts, the art of poetry.</p> + +<p>In the history of poetry we shall find less evidence of progress than +anywhere else, for it will be seen that its acknowledged masterpieces +are almost invariably near the beginning of a series rather than near +the end. Almost as soon as a clear and flexible language has been formed +by any people, a great poem has been composed in that language, which +has remained not only unsurpassed, but unequalled, by any subsequent +work. Homer is for us, as he was for the Greeks, the greatest of their +poets; and if the opinion could be taken of all cultivated readers in +those nations that have inherited the Greek tradition, it is doubtful +whether he would not be acclaimed the greatest poet of the ages. Dante +has remained the first of Italian poets, as he was one of the earliest. +Chaucer, who wrote when our language was transforming itself from +Anglo-Saxon into English, has still lovers who are willing for his sake +to master what is to them almost a foreign tongue, and yet other lovers +who ask for new translations of his works into our modern idiom; while +Shakespeare, who wrote almost as soon as that transformation had been +accomplished, is universally reckoned one of the greatest of world +poets. There have, indeed, been true poets at almost all stages of the +world's history, but the pre-eminence of such masters as these can +hardly be questioned, and if we looked to poetry alone for a type of the +arts, we should almost be forced to conclude that art is the reverse of +progressive. We should think of it as gushing forth in full splendor +when the world is ready for it, and as unable ever again to rise to the +level of its fount.</p> + +<p>The art of architecture is later in its beginning than that of poetry, +for it can exist only when men have learned to build solidly and +permanently. A nomad may be a poet, but he cannot be an architect; a +herdsman might have written the Book of Job, but the great builders are +dwellers in cities. But since men first learned to build they have never +quite forgotten how to do so. At all times there have been somewhere +peoples who knew enough of building to mould its utility into forms of +beauty, and the history of architecture may be read more continuously +than that of any other art. It is a history of constant change and of +continuous development, each people and each age forming out of the old +elements a new style which should express its mind, and each style +reaching its point of greatest distinctiveness only to begin a further +transformation into something else; but is it a history of progress? +Building, indeed, has progressed at one time or another. The Romans, +with their domes and arches, were more scientific builders than the +Greeks, with their simple post and lintel, but were they better +architects? We of to-day, with our steel construction, can scrape the +sky with erections that would have amazed the boldest of mediæval +craftsmen; can we equal his art? If we ask where in the history of +architecture do its masterpieces appear, the answer must be: "Almost +anywhere." Wherever men have had the wealth and the energy to build +greatly, they have builded beautifully, and the distinctions are less +between style and style or epoch and epoch than between building and +building: The masterpieces of one time are as the masterpieces of +another, and no man may say that the nave of Amiens is finer than the +Parthenon or that the Parthenon is nobler than the nave of Amiens. One +may say only that each is perfect in its kind, a supreme expression of +the human spirit.</p> + +<p>Of the art of music I must speak with the diffidence becoming to the +ignorant; but it seems to me to consist of two elements and to contain +an inspirational art as direct and as simple as that of poetry, and a +science so difficult that its fullest mastery is of very recent +achievement. In melodic invention it is so far from progressive that its +most brilliant masters are often content to elaborate and to decorate a +theme old enough to have no history—a theme the inventor of which has +been so entirely forgotten that we think of it as sprung not from the +mind of one man, but from that of a whole people, and call it a +folk-song. The song is almost as old as the race, but the symphony has +had to wait for the invention of many instruments and for a mastery of +the laws of harmony, and so symphonic music is a modern art. We are +still adding new instruments to the orchestra and admitting to our +compositions new combinations of sounds, but have we in a hundred years +made any essential progress even in this part of the art? Have we +produced anything, I will not say greater, but anything as great as the +noblest works of Bach and Beethoven?</p> + +<p>Already, and before considering the arts of painting and sculpture, we +are coming within sight of our general law. This law seems to be that, +so far as an art is dependent upon any form of exact knowledge, so far +it partakes of the nature of science and is capable of progress. So far +as it is expressive of a mind and soul, its greatness is dependent upon +the greatness of that mind and soul, and it is incapable of progress. It +may even be the reverse of progressive, because as an art becomes more +complicated and makes ever greater demands upon technical mastery, it +becomes more difficult as a medium of expression, while the mind to be +expressed becomes more sophisticated and less easy of expression in any +medium. It would take a greater mind than Homer's to express modern +ideas in modern verse with Homer's serene perfection; it would take, +perhaps, a greater mind than Bach's to employ all the resources of +modern music with his glorious ease and directness. And greater minds +than those of Bach and Homer the world has not often the felicity to +possess.</p> + +<p>The arts of painting and sculpture are imitative arts above all others, +and therefore more dependent than any others upon exact knowledge, more +tinged with the quality of science. Let us see how they illustrate our +supposed law.</p> + +<p>Sculpture depends, as does architecture, upon certain laws of proportion +in space which are analogous to the laws of proportion in time and in +pitch upon which music is founded. But as sculpture represents the human +figure, whereas architecture and music represent nothing, sculpture +requires for its perfection the mastery of an additional science, which +is the knowledge of the structure and movement of the human body. This +knowledge may be acquired with some rapidity, especially in times and +countries where man is often seen unclothed. So, in the history of +civilizations, sculpture developed early, after poetry, but with +architecture, and before painting and polyphonic music. It reached the +greatest perfection of which it is capable in the age of Pericles, and +from that time progress was impossible to it, and for a thousand years +its movement was one of decline. After the dark ages sculpture was one +of the first arts to revive; and again it develops rapidly—though not +so rapidly as before, conditions of custom and climate being less +favorable to it—until it reaches, in the first half of the sixteenth +century, something near its former perfection. Again it can go no +further; and since then it has changed but has not progressed. In +Phidias, by which name I would signify the sculptor of the pediments of +the Parthenon, we have the coincidence of a superlatively great artist +with the moment of technical and scientific perfection in the art, and a +similar coincidence crowns the work of Michelangelo with a peculiar +glory. But, apart from the work of these two men, the essential value +of a work of sculpture is by no means always equal to its technical and +scientific completeness. There are archaic statues that are almost as +nobly beautiful as any work by Phidias and more beautiful than almost +any work that has been done since his time. There are bits of Gothic +sculpture that are more valuable expressions of human feeling than +anything produced by the contemporaries of Buonarroti. Even in times of +decadence a great artist has created finer things than could be +accomplished by a mediocre talent of the great epochs, and the world +could ill spare the Victory of Samothrace or the portrait busts of +Houdon.</p> + +<p>As sculpture is one of the simplest of the arts, painting is one of the +most complicated. The harmonies it constructs are composed of almost +innumerable elements of lines and forms and colors and degrees of +light and dark, and the science it professes is no less than that of the +visible aspect of the whole of nature—a science so vast that it never +has been and perhaps never can be mastered in its totality. Anything +approaching a complete art of painting can exist only in an advanced +stage of civilization. An entirely complete art of painting never has +existed and probably never will exist. The history of painting, after +its early stages, is a history of loss here balancing gain there, of a +new means of expression acquired at the cost of an old one.</p> + +<p>We know comparatively little of the painting of antiquity, but we have +no reason to suppose that that art, however admirable, ever attained to +ripeness, and we know that the painting of the Orient has stopped short +at a comparatively early stage of development. For our purpose the art +to be studied is the painting of modern times in Europe from its origin +in the Middle Ages. Even in the beginning, or before the beginning, +while painting is a decadent reminiscence of the past rather than a +prophecy of the new birth, there are decorative splendors in the +Byzantine mosaics hardly to be recaptured. Then comes primitive +painting, an art of the line and of pure color with little modulation +and no attempt at the rendering of solid form. It gradually attains to +some sense of relief by the use of degrees of light and less light; but +the instant it admits the true shadow the old brightness and purity of +color have become impossible. The line remains dominant for a time and +is carried to the pitch of refinement and beauty, but the love for solid +form gradually overcomes it, and in the art of the high Renaissance it +takes a second place. Then light-and-shade begins to be studied for its +own sake; color, no longer pure and bright, but deep and resonant, comes +in again; the line vanishes altogether, and even form becomes +secondary. The last step is taken by Rembrandt, and even color is +subordinated to light-and-shade, which exists alone in a world of +brownness. At every step there has been progress, but there has also +been regress. Perhaps the greatest balance of gain against loss and the +nearest approach to a complete art of painting were with the great +Venetians. The transformation is still going on, and in our own day we +have conquered some corners of the science of visible aspects which were +unexplored by our ancestors. But the balance has turned against us; our +loss has been greater than our gain; and our art, even in its scientific +aspect, is inferior to that of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.</p> + +<p>And just because there never has been a complete art of painting, +entirely rounded and perfected, it is the clearer to us that the final +value of a work in that art never has depended on its approach to such +completion. There is no one supreme master of painting but a long +succession of masters of different yet equal glory. If the masterpieces +of architecture are everywhere because there has often been a complete +art of architecture, the masterpieces of painting are everywhere for the +opposite reason. And if we do not always value a master the more as his +art is more nearly complete, neither do we always value him especially +who has placed new scientific conquests at the disposal of art. Palma +Vecchio painted by the side of Titian, but he is only a minor master; +Botticelli remained of the generation before Leonardo, but he is one of +the immortal great. Paolo Ucello, by his study of perspective, made a +distinct advance in pictorial science, but his interest for us is purely +historic; Fra Angelico made no advance whatever, but he practised +consummately the current art as he found it, and his work is eternally +delightful. At every stage of its development the art of painting has +been a sufficient medium for the expression of a great man's mind; and +wherever and whenever a great man has practised it, the result has been +a great and permanently valuable work of art.</p> + +<p>For this seems, finally, to be the law of all the arts—the one +essential prerequisite to the production of a great work of art is a +great man. You cannot have the art without the man, and when you have +the man you have the art. His time and his surroundings will color him; +his art will not be at one time or place precisely what it might be at +another; but at bottom the art is the man and at all times and in all +countries is just as great as the man.</p> + +<p>Let us clear our minds, then, of the illusion that there is in any +important sense such a thing as progress in the fine arts. We may with +a clear conscience judge every new work for what it appears in itself to +be, asking of it that it be noble and beautiful and reasonable, not that +it be novel or progressive. If it be great art it will always be novel +enough, for there will be a great mind behind it, and no two great minds +are alike. And if it be novel without being great, how shall we be the +better off? There are enough forms of mediocre or evil art in the world +already. Being no longer intimidated by the fetich of progress, when a +thing calling itself a work of art seems to us hideous and degraded, +indecent and insane, we shall have the courage to say so and shall not +care to investigate it further. Detestable things have been produced in +the past, and they are none the less detestable because we are able to +see how they came to be produced. Detestable things are produced now, +and they will be no more admirable if we learn to understand the minds +that create them. Even should such things prove to be not the mere +freaks of a diseased intellect that they seem but a necessary outgrowth +of the conditions of the age and a true prophecy of "the art of the +future," they are not necessarily the better for that. It is only that +the future will be very unlucky in its art.</p> + + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="IV" id="IV"></a>IV</h2> + +<h2>RAPHAEL</h2> + + +<p>There used to be on the cover of the "Portfolio Monographs" little +medallions of Raphael and Rembrandt, placed there, as the editor, Mr. +Hamerton, has somewhere explained, as portraits of the two most widely +influential artists that ever lived. In the eighteenth century, one +imagines, Rembrandt's presence by the side of Raphael would have been +thought little less than a scandal. To-day it is Raphael's place that +would be contested, and he would be superseded, likely enough, by +Velazquez.</p> + +<p>There is no more striking instance of the vicissitudes of critical +opinion than the sudden fall of Raphael from his conceded rank as "the +prince of painters." Up to the middle of the nineteenth century his +right to that title was so uncontested that it alone was a sufficient +identification of him—only one man could possibly be meant. That he +should ever need defending or re-explaining to a generation grown cold +to him would have seemed incredible. Then came the rediscovery of an +earlier art that seemed more frank and simple than his; still later the +discovery of Rembrandt and Velazquez—the romanticist and the +naturalist—and Raphael, as a living influence, almost ceased to exist. +It was but a few years ago that the author of a volume of essays on art +was gravely praised by a reviewer for the purely accidental circumstance +that that volume contained no essay on Raphael; and a little later the +writer of a book on the pictures in Rome "had to confess unutterable +boredom" in the presence of the Stanze of the Vatican.</p> + +<p>It is not probable that any critic who greatly valued his reputation, or +who had any serious reputation to value, would take quite this tone; +but, leaving out of consideration the impressionistic and ultra-modern +criticism which ignores Raphael altogether, it is instructive to note +the way in which a critic so steeped in Italian art as Mr. Berenson +approaches the fallen prince. The artist who used to be considered the +greatest of draughtsmen he will hardly admit to be a draughtsman at all, +ranking him far below Pollaiuolo and positively speaking of him as "a +poor creature, most docile and patient." As a colorist and a manipulator +of paint, he places him with Sebastiano del Piombo—that is, among the +mediocrities. Almost the only serious merit, from his point of view, +which he will allow him is a mastery in the rendering of space, shared +in nearly equal measure by Perugino, as, to some extent, by nearly all +the painters of the Umbrian school. For, while he admits that Raphael +was the greatest master of composition that Europe has produced, he +evidently thinks of composition, as do so many other moderns, as a +matter of relatively little importance.</p> + +<p>It is not Raphael's popularity that is in question; that is, perhaps, as +great as ever it was. His works, in one form or another of reproduction, +from the finest carbon print to the cheapest lithograph, are still to be +found, in the humblest homes as in the most splendid, in nearly every +quarter of the globe. That popularity was always based on what Berenson +calls the "illustrative" qualities of Raphael's work, on the beauty of +his women, the majesty of his men; on his ability to tell a story as we +like it told and to picture a world that we wish might be real. One may +not be prepared to consider these illustrative qualities so negligible +as do many modern critics, or to echo Mr. Berenson's phrase about "that +which in art ... is so unimportant as what ... we call beauty." One +might point out that the greatest artists, from Phidias to Rembrandt, +have occupied themselves with illustration, and that to formulate the +ideals of a race and an epoch is no mean task. But, for the moment, we +may neglect all that, our present inquiry being why an artist, once +counted the greatest of all, is no longer considered very significant by +those who measure by purely artistic standards rather than by that of +illustrative success and consequent popularity.</p> + +<p>We may also leave out of our present consideration Raphael's achievement +in the suggestion of space. It is a very real quality and a high one. It +has doubtless always been an important element in the enjoyability of +Raphael's art, as it is almost the only enjoyable element, for many of +us, in the art of Perugino. But it is an element that has only very +recently been clearly perceived to exist. If it was enjoyed by the +artists and critics, from Raphael's day almost to our own, they were +unconscious of the fact, and the probability is that we enjoy it more +than they did. It will not account for the estimation in which they held +Raphael, and still less will it account for the relative lack of +interest in him to-day.</p> + +<p>In truth the reason why many modern critics and painters almost dislike +Raphael is the very reason for which he was so greatly revered. Coming +in the nick of time, at the close of an epoch of investigation, himself +a man of wide culture and quick intellect but of no special originality +or emotional power, he learned from all his predecessors what they had +to teach and, choosing from the elements of their art those which were +suited to his purpose, formed a perfectly balanced and noble style which +was immediately accepted as the only style suitable to the expression of +lofty ideas in monumental form. He became the lawgiver, the founder of +classicism, the formulator of the academic ideal. Not to admire him was +to confess oneself a barbarian, and even those who did not really care +for his art hardly dared to say so. As long as the academic ideal +retained any validity his supremacy endured, and it was only with the +definitive turning of modern art into the paths of romanticism and +naturalism that revolt became possible.</p> + +<p>But when the world became tired of Raphaelism it inevitably became +unjust to Raphael. It forgot that it was not he who had made his art the +test of that of others—who had erected what, with him, was a +spontaneous and original creation into a rigid system of laws. It +confounded him with his followers and imitators, and, being bored by +them, began to find the master himself a bore.</p> + +<p>For, eclectic as he was by nature, and founder as he was of the academic +régime, the "grand style" of Raphael was yet a new and personal +contribution to art. He drew from many sources, but the principle of +combination was his own. His originality was in that mastery of +composition which no one has ever denied him, but which is very +differently rated as a quality of art by different temperaments. Almost +everything specifically Raphaelesque in his work is the offspring of +that power of design in which he is still the unapproached master. +Modern criticism is right in denying that he was a draughtsman, if by +draughtsman is meant one deeply preoccupied with form and structure for +its own sake. His distinction was to invest the human figure with such +forms as should best fit it to play its part in a scheme of monumental +composition. The "style" of his draperies, so much and so justly +admired, is composition of draperies. He was not a colorist as Titian +was a colorist, or a painter as Velazquez was a painter—he was just so +much of a colorist and a painter as is compatible with being the +greatest of decorative designers. Everything in his finest works is +entirely subordinated to the beauty and expressiveness of composition, +and nothing is allowed to have too great an individual interest for its +predestined part in the final result. Probably he could not have drawn +like Michelangelo or painted like Hals—certainly, when he once +understood himself, he would not have desired to do so.</p> + +<p>Even in his early work he showed his gifts as a composer, and some of +the small pictures of his Florentine period are quite perfect in +design. Nothing could be better composed within their restricted field +than the "Madonna del Cardellino" or the "Belle Jardinière." Nearly at +the end of the period he made his greatest failure, the "Entombment" of +the Borghese Gallery. It was his most ambitious effort up to this time +and he wanted to put everything that he had learned into it, to draw +like Michelangelo and to express emotion like Mantegna. He made a host +of studies for it, tried it this way and that, lost all spontaneity and +all grasp of the ensemble. What he finally produced is a thing of +fragments, falling far below his models in the qualities he was +attempting to rival and redeemed by little or nothing of the quality +proper to himself. But, apparently, it answered its purpose. It freed +him from preoccupation with the work of others. When his great +opportunity came to him, in the commission to decorate the Camera della +Segnatura, his painfully acquired knowledge was sufficiently at his +command to give him no further trouble. He could concentrate himself on +the essential part of his problem, the creation of an entirely +appropriate, dignified, and beautiful decorative design. It was the work +for which he was born, and he succeeded so immediately and so admirably +in it that neither he nor any one else has ever been able to fill such +spaces so perfectly again.</p> + +<p>There are fourteen important compositions in the room. The decoration of +the ceiling had already been begun by Sodoma, and Sodoma's decorative +framework Raphael allowed to remain; partly, perhaps, from courtesy, +more probably because its general disposition was admirable and not to +be improved on. If Sodoma had begun any of the larger paintings which +were to fill his frames they were removed to make way for the new work. +There has always been a great deal of discussion as to whether Raphael +himself invented the admirable scheme of subjects by which the room was +made to illustrate the Renaissance ideal of culture with its division +into the four great fields of learning: divinity, philosophy (including +science), poetry, and law. In reality, the question is of little +importance. There seems to be at least one bit of internal evidence, to +be mentioned presently, that even here the artist did not have a +perfectly free hand, as we know he did not later. Whoever thought of the +subjects, it was Raphael who discovered how to treat them in such a way +as to make of this room the most perfectly planned piece of decoration +in the world. Sodoma had left, on the vaulting, four circular medallions +and four rectangular spaces which were to be filled with figure +compositions. In the circles, each directly above one of the great wall +spaces, Raphael placed figures personifying Theology, Philosophy, +Poetry and Justice; in the rectangles he illustrated these subjects with +the stories of "The Fall of Man," "Apollo and Marsyas," and "The +Judgment of Solomon," and with that figure, leaning over a celestial +globe, which must be meant for Science. All of these panels are on +curved surfaces, and Raphael's decorative instinct led him, on this +account and to preserve the supremacy of the great wall spaces below, to +suppress all distance, placing his figures against a background of +simulated gold mosaic and arranging them, virtually, upon one plane. +There is, therefore, no possible question of "space composition" here. +These panels depend for their effect entirely upon composition in two +dimensions—upon the perfect balancing of filled and empty spaces, the +invention of interesting shapes, and the arrangement of beautiful lines. +It is the pattern that counts, and the pattern is perfect.</p> + +<p>The "Poetry" (Pl. 11) is the most beautiful of the medallions, but they +are all much alike: a draped female figure in the middle, seated to give +it scale, large enough to fill the height of the circle amply but +without crowding, and winged <i>putti</i>, bearing inscribed tablets, on +either side. There are other ways of filling a circle acceptably, as +Botticelli had shown and as Raphael was to show again in more than one +<i>tondo</i>, but for their situation, marking the principal axes of the +room, there is no way so adequate as this. As Mr. Blashfield has said, +speaking from experience: "When a modern painter has a medallion to fill +and has tried one arrangement after another, he inevitably realizes that +it is Raphael who has found the best ordering that could be found; and +the modern painter builds upon his lines, laid down so distinctly that +the greater the practice of the artist the more complete becomes his +realization of Raphael's comprehension of essentials in composition." +Not only so, but the modern painter finds as inevitably that, accepting +this ordering as the best, even then he cannot add another figure to +these four. He may, perhaps, draw it better in detail or give more +character to the head, but he cannot capture that felicity of spacing, +that absoluteness of balance, that variety and vivacity combined with +monumental repose. The more his nature and training have made him a +designer the more certainly he feels, before that single medallion of +Poetry, that he is in the presence of the inimitable master of design.</p> + +<p><a name="p11_t" id="p11_t"></a> +</p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 306px;"> + +<a href="images/p11.jpg"> +<img src="images/p11_t.jpg" width="306" height="300" alt="Plate 11.—Raphael. "Poetry." In the Vatican." title="Plate 11.—Raphael. "Poetry." In the Vatican." /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 11.—Raphael. "Poetry." In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>If the composition of the rectangles is less inevitable it is only +because the variety of ways in which such simple rectangles may be +filled is almost infinite. Composition more masterly than that of the +"Judgment of Solomon" (Pl. 12), for instance, you will find nowhere; so +much is told in a restricted space, yet with no confusion, the space is +so admirably filled and its shape so marked by the very lines that +enrich and relieve it. It is as if the design had determined the space +rather than the space the design. If you had a tracing of the figures in +the midst of an immensity of white paper you could not bound them by any +other line than that of the actual frame. One of the most remarkable +things about it is the way in which the angles, which artists usually +avoid and disguise, are here sharply accented. A great part of the +dignity and importance given to the king is due to the fact that his +head fills one of these angles, and the opposite one contains the hand +of the executioner and the foot by which the living child is held aloft, +and to this point the longest lines of the picture lead. The dead +child and the indifferent mother fill the lower corners. In the middle, +herself only half seen and occupying little space, is the true mother, +and it seems that her explosive energy, as she rushes to the rescue of +her child, has forced all these other figures back to the confines of +the picture. Compare this restless yet subtly balanced composition, full +of oblique lines and violent movement, with the gracious, placid +formality of the "Adam and Eve," and you will have some notion of the +meaning of this gift of design.</p> + +<p><a name="p12_t" id="p12_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 255px;"> + +<a href="images/p12.jpg"> +<img src="images/p12_t.jpg" width="255" height="320" alt="Plate 12.—Raphael. "The Judgment of Solomon." +In the Vatican." title="The Judgment of Solomon" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 12.—Raphael. "The Judgment of Solomon." +In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>But it is the frescoes on the four walls of this room which are +Raphael's greatest triumphs—the most perfect pieces of monumental +decoration in the world. On the two longer walls, nearly unbroken +lunettes of something over a semicircle, he painted the two great +compositions of Theology and Philosophy known as the "Disputa" and the +"School of Athens." The "Disputa" (Pl. 13), the earlier of the two, has +the more connection with the art of the past. The use of gilded relief +in the upper part recalls the methods of Pintoricchio, and the hint of +the whole arrangement was doubtless taken from those semidomes which +existed in many churches. But what an original idea it was to transform +the flat wall of a room into the apse of a cathedral, and what a +solemnity it imparts to the discussion that is going on! The upper part +is formal in the extreme, as it need be for the treatment of such a +theme, but even here there is variety as well as stateliness in the +attitudes and the spacing. In the lower part the variety becomes almost +infinite, yet there is never a jar—not a line or a fold of drapery that +mars the supreme order of the whole. Besides the uncounted cherubs which +float among the rays of glory or support the cloudy thrones of the +saints and prophets, there are between seventy and eighty figures in +the picture; yet the hosts of heaven and the church on earth seem +gathered about the altar with its sacred wafer—the tiny circle which is +the focus of the great composition and the inevitable goal of all +regards, as it is the central mystery of Catholic dogma.</p> + +<p><a name="p13_t" id="p13_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 400px;"> + +<a href="images/p13.jpg"> +<img src="images/p13_t.jpg" width="400" height="294" alt="Plate 13.—Raphael. The "Disputa." +In the Vatican." title="The Disputa" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 13.—Raphael. The "Disputa." +In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>Opposite, in the "School of Athens" (Pl. 14), the treatment is different +but equally successful. The hieratic majesty of the "Disputa" was here +unnecessary, but a tranquil and spacious dignity was to be attained, and +it is attained through the use of vertical and horizontal lines—the +lines of stability and repose, while the bounding curve is echoed again +and again in the diminishing arches of the imagined vaulting. The +figures, fewer in number than in the "Disputa" and confined to the lower +half of the composition, are ranged in two long lines across the +picture; but the nearer line is broken in the centre and the two +figures on the steps, serving as connecting-links between the two ranks, +give to the whole something of that semicircular grouping so noticeable +in the companion picture. The bas-reliefs upon the architecture and the +great statues of Apollo and Minerva above them draw the eye upward at +the sides, and this movement is intensified by the arrangement of the +lateral groups of figures. By these means the counter curve to the arch +above, the one fixed necessity, apparently, of the lunette, is +established. It is more evident in the perspective curve of the painted +dome. Cover this line with a bit of paper, or substitute for it a +straight lintel like that seen beyond, and you will be surprised to find +how much of the beauty of the picture has disappeared. The grouping of +the figures themselves, the way they are played about into clumps or +separated to give greater importance, by isolation, to a particular +head, is even more beyond praise than in the "Disputa." The whole design +has but one fault, and that is an afterthought. In the cartoon the +disproportioned bulk of Heraclitus, thrust into the foreground and +writing in an impossible attitude on a desk in impossible perspective, +is not to be found. It is such a blot upon the picture that one cannot +believe that Raphael added it of his own motion; rather it must have +been placed there at the dictation of some meddling cardinal or learned +humanist who, knowing nothing of art, could not see why any vacant space +should not be filled with any figure whose presence seemed to him +historically desirable. One is tempted to suspect even, so clumsy is the +figure and so out of scale with its neighbors, that the master refused +to disfigure his work himself and left the task to one of his +apprentices. If it had been done by one of them, say Giulio Romano, +after the picture was entirely completed and at the time of the +"Incendio del' Borgo," it could not be more out of keeping.</p> + +<p><a name="p14_t" id="p14_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 400px;"> + +<a href="images/p14.jpg"> +<img src="images/p14_t.jpg" width="400" height="280" alt="Plate 14.—Raphael. "The School of Athens." +In the Vatican." title="The School of Athens" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 14.—Raphael. "The School of Athens." +In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>Each of these walls has a doorway at one end, and the way in which these +openings are dissimulated and utilized is most ingenious, particularly +in the "Disputa," where the bits of parapet which play an important part +at either side of the composition, one pierced, the other solid, were +suggested solely by the presence of this door. In the end walls the +openings, large windows much higher than the doors, become of such +importance that the whole nature of the problem is changed. It is the +pierced lunette that is to be dealt with, and Raphael has dealt with it +in two entirely different ways. One wall is symmetrical, the window in +the middle, and on that wall he painted the "Parnassus" (Pl. 15), Apollo +and the Muses in the centre with groups of poets a little lower on +either side and other groups filling the spaces to right and left of the +window head. At first sight the design seems less symmetrical and formal +than the others, with a lyrical freedom befitting the subject, but in +reality it is no less perfect in its ponderation. The group of trees +above Apollo and the reclining figures either side of him accent the +centrality of his position. From this point the line of heads rises in +either direction to the figures of Homer and of the Muse whose back is +turned to the spectator, and the perpendicularity of these two figures +carries upward into the arch the vertical lines of the window. From this +point the lateral masses of foliage take up the drooping curve and unite +it to the arch, and this curve is strongly reinforced by the building up +toward either side of the foreground groups and by the disposition of +the arms of Sappho and of the poets immediately behind her, while, to +disguise its formality, it is contradicted by the long line of Sappho's +body, which echoes that of the bearded poet immediately to the right of +the window and gives a sweep to the left to the whole lower part of the +composition. It is the immediate and absolute solution of the problem, +and so small a thing as the scarf of the back-turned Muse plays its +necessary part in it, balancing, as it does, the arm of the Muse who +stands highest on the left and establishing one of a number of +subsidiary garlands that play through and bind together the wonderful +design.</p> + +<p><a name="p15_t" id="p15_t"></a></p> + +<div class="figleft" style="width: 400px;"> + +<a href="images/p15.jpg"> +<img src="images/p15_t.jpg" width="400" height="284" alt="Plate 15.—Raphael. "Parnassus." +In the Vatican." title="Parnassus" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 15.—Raphael. "Parnassus." +In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>The window in the opposite wall is to one side of the middle, and here +Raphael meets the new problem with a new solution. He places a separate +picture in each of the unequal rectangles, carries a simulated cornice +across at the level of the window head, and paints, in the segmental +lunette thus left, the so-called "Jurisprudence" (Pl. 16), which +seems to many decorators the most perfect piece of decorative design +that even Raphael ever created—the most perfect piece of design, +therefore, in the world. Its subtlety of spacing, its exquisiteness of +line, its monumental simplicity, rippled through with a melody of +falling curves from end to end, are beyond description—the reader must +study them for himself in the illustration. One thing he might miss were +not his attention called to it—the ingenious way in which the whole +composition is adjusted to a diagonal axis that the asymmetry of the +wall may be minimized. Draw an imaginary straight line from the boss in +the soffit of the arch through the middle of the Janus-head of Prudence. +It will accurately bisect the central group, composed of this figure and +her two attendant genii, will pass through her elevated left knee, the +centre of a system of curves, and the other end of it will strike the +top of the post or mullion that divides the window opening into two +parts.</p> + +<p><a name="p16_t" id="p16_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 400px;"> + +<a href="images/p16.jpg"> +<img src="images/p16_t.jpg" width="400" height="267" alt="Plate 16.—Raphael. "Jurisprudence." +In the Vatican." title="Jurisprudence" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 16.—Raphael. "Jurisprudence." +In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>This single room, the Camera della Segnatura, marks the brief blossoming +time of Raphael's art, an art consummate in science yet full of a +freshness and spontaneity—the dew still upon it—as wonderful as its +learning. The master himself could not duplicate it. He tried for +Venetian warmth of color in the "Mass of Bolsena" (Pl. 17) and +experimented with tricks of illumination in the "Deliverance of Peter" +(Pl. 18), and in these two compositions, struck out new and admirable +ways of filling pierced lunettes. The balancing, in the one, of the +solitary figure of the pope against the compact group of seven +figures—a group that has to be carried up above the curved screen in +order to counteract the importance given to Julius by his isolation and +by the greater mass of his supporting group below—is a triumph of +arrangement; and here, again, it is notable that the bleeding wafer, the +necessary centre of interest, is situated on a straight line drawn +diagonally from the keystone of the arch to the centre of the window +head, and almost exactly half-way between these two points, while the +great curve of the screen leads to it from either side. In the +symmetrically pierced lunette opposite, the distribution of the space +into three distinct but united pictures, the central one seen through +the grating of the prison, is a highly ingenious and, on the whole, an +acceptable variant on previous inventions. But these two are the last of +the Vatican frescoes that show Raphael's infallible instinct as a +composer. He grows tired, exaggerates his mannerisms, gives a greater +and greater share of the work to his pupils. The later Stanze are either +pompous or confused, or both, until we reach the higgledy-piggledy of +the "Burning of the Borgo" or that inextricable tangle, suggestive of +nothing so much as of a dish of macaroni, the "Battle of Constantine," a +picture painted after the master's death, but for which he probably left +something in the way of sketches.</p> + +<p><a name="p17_t" id="p17_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 400px;"> + +<a href="images/p17.jpg"> +<img src="images/p17_t.jpg" width="400" height="291" alt="Plate 17.—Raphael. "The Mass of Bolsena." +In the Vatican." title="The Mass of Bolsena" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 17.—Raphael. "The Mass of Bolsena." +In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>Yet even in what seems this decadence of his talent Raphael only needed +a new problem to revive his admirable powers in their full splendor. In +1514 he painted the "Sibyls" (Pl. 19) of Santa Maria della Pace, in a +frieze-shaped panel cut by a semicircular arch, and the new shape given +him to fill inspired a composition as perfect in itself and as +indisputably the only right one for the place as anything he ever did. +Among his latest works were the pendentives of the Farnesina, with the +story of Cupid and Psyche—works painted and even drawn by his pupils, +coarse in types and heavy in color but altogether astonishing in freedom +and variety of design. The earlier painters covered their vaulting +with ornamental patterns in which spaces were reserved for independent +pictures, like the rectangles of the Stanza della Segnatura. It was a +bold innovation when Michelangelo discarded this system and placed in +the pendentives of the Sistine his colossal figures of the Prophets and +the Sibyls, each on its architectural throne. It was reserved for +Raphael to take a step that no earlier painter could have dreamed of and +to fill these triangular spaces with free groups relieved against a +clear sky which is the continuous background of the whole series. One +may easily think the earlier system more architecturally fitting, but +the skill with which these groups are composed, their perfect +naturalness, their exhaustless variety, the perfection with which they +fill these awkward shapes, as it were inevitably and without effort, is +nothing short of amazing. It is decoration of a festal and informal +order—the decoration of a kind of summer house, fitted for pleasure, +rather than of a stately chamber—but it is decoration the most +consummate, the fitting last word of the greatest master of decorative +design that the world has seen.</p> + +<p><a name="p18_t" id="p18_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 320px;"> + +<a href="images/p18.jpg"> +<img src="images/p18_t.jpg" width="320" height="244" alt="Plate 18.—Raphael. "The Deliverance of Peter." +In the Vatican." title="The Deliverance of Peter" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 18.—Raphael. "The Deliverance of Peter." +In the Vatican.</span> +</div> + +<p>It is this master designer that is the real Raphael, and, but for the +element of design always present in the least of his works, the charming +illustrator, the mere "painter of Madonnas," might be allowed to sink +comfortably into artistic oblivion without cause for protest. But there +is another Raphael we could spare less easily, Raphael the +portrait-painter. The great decorators have nearly always been great +portrait-painters as well, although—perhaps because—there is little +resemblance between the manner of feeling and working necessary for +success in the two arts. The decorator, constantly occupied with +relations of line and space which have little to do with imitation, +finds in the submissive attention to external fact necessary to success +in portraiture a source of refreshment and of that renewed contact with +nature which is constantly necessary to art if it is not to become too +arid an abstraction. Certainly it was so with Raphael, and the master of +design has left us a series of portraits comparable only to those of +that other great designer whose fate was to leave little but portraits +behind him, Hans Holbein. Allowing for the necessary variation of type +and costume in their models and for the difference between an Italian +and a northern education, their methods are singularly alike. Raphael +has greater elegance and feeling for style, Holbein a richer color sense +and, above all, a finer craftsmanship, an unapproachable material +perfection. They have the same quiet, intense observation, the same +impeccable accuracy, the same preoccupation with the person before them +and with nothing else—an individuality to be presented with all it +contains, neither more nor less—to be rendered entirely, and without +flattery as without caricature. There have been portrait-painters who +were greater painters, in the more limited sense of the word, than these +two, and there has been at least one painter whose imaginative sympathy +gave an inner life to his portraits absent from theirs, but in the +essential qualities of portraiture, as distinguished from all other +forms of art, perhaps no one else has quite equalled them. One can give +no greater praise to the "Castiglione" or the "Donna Velata" than to say +that they are fit to hang beside the "Georg Gyze" or the "Christina of +Milan"; and at least one portrait by Raphael, the "Tommaso Inghirami," +in the collection of Mrs. Gardner (Pl. 20)—the original of which the +picture in the Pitti Palace is a replica—has a beauty of surface and +of workmanship almost worthy of Holbein himself.</p> + +<p><a name="p19_t" id="p19_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 350px;"> + +<a href="images/p19.jpg"> +<img src="images/p19t.jpg" width="350" height="246" alt="Plate 19.—Raphael. "The Sibyls." +Santa Maria della Pace, Rome." title="The Sibyls" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 19.—Raphael. "The Sibyls." +Santa Maria della Pace, Rome.</span> +</div> + +<p>Raphael's portraits alone, had he done nothing else, would justify a +great reputation, but they form so relatively small a part of his work +that they may almost be neglected in examining his claims to the rank +that used to be assigned him among the world's greatest artists. It is, +after all, his unique mastery of composition that is his chief title to +fame, and his glory must always be in proportion to the estimation in +which that quality is held. It was because composition was to him a +comparatively unimportant part of painting that Velazquez thought little +of Raphael. It is because, for them, composition, as a distinct element +of art, has almost ceased to exist that so many modern painters and +critics decry Raphael altogether. The decorators have always known that +design is the essence of their art, and therefore they have always +appreciated the greatest of designers. That is why Paul Baudry, in the +third quarter of the nineteenth century, idolized Raphael and based his +own art upon that of the great Umbrian. To-day, in our own country, +mural decoration is again becoming a living art, and the desire for the +appropriate decoration of important buildings with monumental works of +painting is more wide-spread, perhaps, than it has been anywhere at any +time since the Italian Renaissance. So surely as the interest in +decorative painting and the knowledge of its true principles become more +widely spread, so surely will the name of Raphael begin to shine again +with something of its ancient splendor.</p> + +<p><a name="p20_t" id="p20_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 256px;"> + +<a href="images/p20.jpg"> +<img src="images/p20_t.jpg" width="256" height="360" alt="Plate 20.—Raphael. "Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami." +In the collection of Mrs. Gardner." title="Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 20.—Raphael. "Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami." +In the collection of Mrs. Gardner.</span> +</div> + +<p>But design is something more than the essential quality of mural +decoration—it is the common basis of all the arts, the essential thing +in art itself. Each of the arts has its qualities proper to it alone, +and it may be right to estimate the painter, the sculptor, the +architect, or the musician according to his eminence in those qualities +which are distinctive of his particular art and which separate it most +sharply from the other arts. In that sense we are right to call Frans +Hals a greater painter than Raphael. But if we estimate a man's artistry +by the same standard, whatever the form of art in which it expresses +itself, rating him by his power of co-ordinating and composing notes or +forms or colors into a harmonious and beautiful unity, then must we +place Raphael pretty near where he used to be placed, admitting but a +choice few of the very greatest to any equality with him. If we no +longer call him "the prince of painters" we must call him one of the +greatest artists among those who have practised the art of painting.</p> + + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="V" id="V"></a>V</h2> + +<h2>TWO WAYS OF PAINTING</h2> + + +<p>Among the modern paintings in the Metropolitan Museum is a brilliant and +altogether remarkable little picture by John Sargent, entitled "The +Hermit" (Pl. 21). Mr. Sargent is a portrait-painter by vocation, and the +public knows him best as a penetrating and sometimes cruel reader of +human character. He is a mural painter by avocation and capable, on +occasion, of a monumental formality. In this picture, as in the +wonderful collection of watercolors in the Brooklyn Institute of Arts +and Sciences, one fancies one sees the essential John Sargent, working +for himself alone without regard to external demands, and doing what he +really cares most to do. In such work he is a modern of the moderns +and, in the broadest sense of the word, a thorough Impressionist. Not +that he shows himself a disciple of Monet or occupies himself with the +broken touch or the division of tones—his method is as direct as that +of Sorolla and his impressionism is of the same kind—a bending of all +his energies to the vivid realization of the effect of the scene +rendered as one might perceive it in the first flash of vision if one +came upon it unexpectedly. This picture is better than Sorolla—it is +better than almost any one. It is perhaps the most astonishing +realization of the modern ideal, the most accomplished transcript of the +actual appearance of nature, that has yet been produced. It is because +of its great merit, because of its extraordinary success in what it +attempts, that it leads one to the serious consideration of the nature +of the attempt and of the gain and loss involved in the choice that +modern art has made.</p> + +<p>The picture is exactly square—the choice of this form is, of itself, +typically modern in its unexpectedness—and represents a bit of rough +wood interior under intense sunlight. The light is studied for its +brilliancy rather than for its warmth, and if the picture has a fault, +granted the point of view of the painter, it is in a certain coldness of +color; but such conditions of glaring and almost colorless light do +exist in nature. One sees a few straight trunks of some kind of pine or +larch, a network of branches and needles, a tumble of moss-spotted and +lichened rocks, a confusion of floating lights and shadows, and that is +all. The conviction of truth is instantaneous—it is an actual bit of +nature, just as the painter found it. One is there on that ragged +hillside, half dazzled by the moving spots of light, as if set down +there suddenly, with no time to adjust one's vision. Gradually one's +eyes clear and one is aware, first of a haggard human head with tangled +beard and unkempt hair, then of an emaciated body. There is a man in the +wood! And then—did they betray themselves by some slight +movement?—there are a couple of slender antelopes who were but now +invisible and who melt into their surroundings again at the slightest +inattention. It is like a pictorial demonstration of protective coloring +in men and animals.</p> + +<p><a name="p21_t" id="p21_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 319px;"> + +<a href="images/p21.jpg"> +<img src="images/p21_t.jpg" width="319" height="320" alt="Plate 21.—Sargent. "The Hermit." +In the Metropolitan Museum of Art." title="The Hermit" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 21.—Sargent. "The Hermit." +In the Metropolitan Museum of Art.</span> +</div> + +<p>Now, almost any one can see how superbly all this is rendered. Any one +can marvel at and admire the free and instantaneous handling, the web of +slashing and apparently meaningless brush strokes which, at a given +distance, take their places by a kind of magic and <i>are</i> the things they +represent. But it takes a painter to know how justly it is observed. In +these days no painter, whatever may be his deepest convictions, can +escape the occasional desire to be modern; and most of us have +attempted, at one time or another, the actual study of the human figure +in the open air. We have taken our model into a walled garden or a deep +wood or the rocky ravine of a brook and have set ourselves seriously to +find out what a naked man or woman really looks like in the setting of +outdoor nature. And we have found just what Sargent has painted. The +human figure, as a figure, has ceased to exist. Line and structure and +all that we have most cared for have disappeared. Even the color of +flesh has ceased to count, and the most radiant blond skin of the +fairest woman has become an insignificant pinkish spot no more important +than a stone and not half so important as a flower. Humanity is absorbed +into the landscape.</p> + +<p>Obviously, there are two courses open to the painter. If he is a modern +by feeling and by training, full of curiosity and of the scientific +temper, caring more for the investigation of the aspects of nature and +the rendering of natural light and atmosphere than for the telling of a +story or the construction of a decoration, he will, if he is able +enough, treat his matter much as Sargent has treated it. The figure will +become, for him, only an incident in the landscape. It will be important +only as a thing of another texture and another color, valuable for the +different way in which it receives the light and reflects the sky, just +as rocks and foliage and water and bare earth are valuable. For to the +true Impressionist light and atmosphere are the only realities, and +objects exist only to provide surfaces for the play of light and +atmosphere. He will abandon all attempt at rendering the material and +physical significance of the human form and will still less concern +himself with its spiritual significance. He will gain a great vividness +of illusion, and he may console himself for what he loses with the +reflection that he has expressed the true relation of man to the +universe—that he has expressed either man's insignificance or man's +oneness with nature, according as his temper is pessimistic or +optimistic.</p> + +<p>If, on the other hand, the painter is one to whom the figure as a figure +means much; one to whom line and bulk and modelling are the principal +means of expression, and who cares for the structure and stress of bone +and muscle; if the glow and softness of flesh appeal strongly to him; +above all, if he has the human point of view and thinks of his figures +as people engaged in certain actions, having certain characters, +experiencing certain states of mind and body; then he will give up the +struggle with the truths of aspect that seem so vital to the painter of +the other type and, by a frank use of conventions, will seek to +increase the importance of his figure at the expense of its +surroundings. He will give it firmer lines and clearer edges, will +strengthen its light and shade, will dwell upon its structure or its +movement and expression. He will so compose his landscape as to +subordinate it to his figure and will make its lines echo and accentuate +that figure's action or repose. When he has accomplished his task he +will have painted not man insignificant before nature but man dominating +nature.</p> + +<p>For an example of this way of representing man's relation to the world +about him, let us take Titian's "Saint Jerome" (Pl. 22)—a picture +somewhat similar to Sargent's in subject and in the relative size of the +figure and its surroundings. Titian has here given more importance to +the landscape than was common in his day. He also has meant, as Sargent +has, to make a great deal of the wilderness to which his saint has +retired, and to make his saint a lonely human being in a savage place. +But the saint and his emotion is, after all, what interests Titian most, +and the wildness of nature is valuable to him mainly for its sympathy +with this emotion. He wants to give a single powerful feeling and to +give it with the utmost dramatic force—to give it theatrically even, +one might admit of this particular picture; for it is by no means so +favorable an example of Titian's method, or of the older methods of art +in general, as is Sargent's "Hermit" of the modern way of seeing and +painting. To attain this end he simplifies and arranges everything. He +lowers the pitch of his coloring to a sombre glow and concentrates the +little light upon his kneeling figure. He spends all his knowledge on so +drawing and modelling that figure as to make you feel to the utmost its +bulk and reality and the strain upon its muscles and tendons, and he +so places everything else on his canvas as to intensify its action and +expression. The gaze of the saint is fixed upon a crucifix high on the +right of the picture, and the book behind him, the lines of the rocks, +the masses of the foliage, even the general formation of the ground, are +so disposed as to echo and reinforce the great diagonal. There is a +splendid energy of invention in the drawing of the tree stems, but the +effect is clear and simple with nothing of Sargent's dazzle and +confusion. As for the lion, he is a mere necessary mark of +identification, and Titian has taken no interest in him.</p> + +<p><a name="p22_t" id="p22_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 250px;"> + +<a href="images/p22.jpg"> +<img src="images/p22_t.jpg" width="250" height="400" alt="Plate 22.—Titian. "St. Jerome in the Desert." +In the Brera Gallery, Milan." title="St. Jerome in the Desert" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 22.—Titian. "St. Jerome in the Desert." +In the Brera Gallery, Milan.</span> +</div> + +<p>Now, it is evident that there is not nearly so much literal truth to the +appearance of nature in this picture as in Sargent's. It is not only +that it would never have occurred to Titian to try to paint the +glittering spottiness of sunlight splashing through leafage, or to +attempt to raise his key of light to something like that of nature, at +the cost of fulness of color. It is not merely that he translates and +simplifies and neglects certain truths that the world had not yet +learned to see. He deliberately and intentionally falsifies. He knew as +well as we do that a natural landscape would not arrange itself in such +lines and masses for the purpose of throwing out the figure and of +enhancing its emotion. But to him natural facts were but so much +material, to be treated as he pleased for the carrying out of his +purpose. He was a colorist and a chiaroscurist; and he had a great deal +more interest in light and in landscape than most of the painters of his +time. If he had been pre-eminently a draughtsman, like Michelangelo, he +would have reduced his light and shade to the amount strictly necessary +to give that powerful modelling of the figure which is the draughtsman's +means of expression, would have greatly increased the relative size and +importance of the figure, and would have reduced the landscape to a +barely intelligible symbol. Had he been a linealist, like Botticelli, he +would have eliminated modelling almost altogether, would have +concentrated his attention upon the edges of things, and would have +reduced his picture to a flat pattern in which the beauty and +expressiveness of the lines should be almost the only attraction.</p> + +<p>For all art is an exchange of gain against loss—you cannot have +Sargent's truth of impression and Titian's truth of emotion in the same +picture, nor Michelangelo's beauty of structure with Botticelli's beauty +of line. To be a successful artist is to know what you want and to get +it at any necessary sacrifice, though the greatest artists maintain a +noble balance and sacrifice no more than is necessary. And if a painter +of to-day is like-minded with these older masters he will have to +express himself much in their manner. He will have to make, with his +eyes open, the sacrifices which they made, more or less unconsciously, +and to deny a whole range of truths with which his fellows are occupied +that he may express clearly and forcibly the few truths which he has +chosen.</p> + +<p>All truths are good, and all ways of painting are legitimate that are +necessary to the expression of any truth. I am not here concerned to +show that one way is better than another or one set of truths more +important than another set of truths. For the present I am desirous only +of showing why there is more than one way—of explaining the necessity +of different methods for the expression of different individualities and +different ways of envisaging nature and art. But a little while ago it +was the modern or impressionistic manner that needed explanation. It +was new, it was revolutionary, and it was misunderstood and disliked. A +generation of critics has been busy in explaining it, a generation of +artists has been busy in practising it, and now the balance has turned +the other way. The pressure of conformity is upon the other side, and it +is the older methods that need justification and explanation. The +prejudices of the workers and the writers have gradually and naturally +become the prejudices of at least a part of the public, and it has +become necessary to show that the small minority of artists who still +follow the old roads do so not from ignorance or stupidity or a stolid +conservatism, still less from mere wilful caprice, but from necessity, +because those roads are the only ones that can lead them where they wish +to go. No more magnificent demonstration of the qualities possible to +the purely modern methods of painting has been made than this brilliant +little picture of Sargent's. All the more is it a demonstration of the +qualities impossible to these methods. If such qualities have any +permanent value and interest for the modern world it is a gain for art +that some painters should try to keep alive the methods that render +possible their attainment.</p> + + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="VI" id="VI"></a>VI</h2> + +<h2>THE AMERICAN SCHOOL</h2> + + +<p>In the catalogues of our museums you may find entries like this: "John +Smith, American school; The Empty Jug" or what-not. In such entries +little more than a bare statement of nationality is intended. John Smith +is an American, by birth or adoption; that is all that the statement is +meant to convey. But the question occurs: Have we an American school in +a more specific sense than this? Have we a body of painters with certain +traits in common and certain differences from the painters of other +countries? Has our production in painting sufficient homogeneity and +sufficient national and local accent to entitle it to the name of +American school in the sense in which there is, undoubtedly, a French +school and an English school?</p> + +<p>Under the conditions of to-day there are no longer anywhere such +distinctive local schools as existed in the Renaissance. In Italy, in +those days, there were not only such great schools as the Venetian, the +Florentine, and the Umbrian, differing widely in their point of view, +their manner of seeing, and their technical traditions—each little town +had a school with something characteristic that separated its painters +from those of other schools in the surrounding towns. To-day every one +knows and is influenced by the work of every one else, and it is only +broad national characteristics that still subsist. Modern pictures are +singularly alike, but, on the whole, it is still possible to tell an +English picture from a French one, and a German or Italian picture from +either. We may still speak of a Dutch school or a Spanish school with +some reasonableness. Is it similarly and equally reasonable to speak of +an American school? Does a room full of American pictures have a +different look from a room full of pictures by artists of any other +nationality? Does one feel that the pictures in such a room have a +something in common that makes them kin and a something different that +distinguishes them from the pictures of all other countries? I think the +answer must be in the affirmative.</p> + +<p>We have already passed the stage of mere apprenticeship, and it can no +longer be said that our American painters are mere reflections of their +European masters. Twenty or even ten years ago there may have been some +truth in the accusation. To-day many of our younger painters have had no +foreign training at all, or have had such as has left no specific mark +of a particular master; and from the work of most of our older painters +it would be difficult to guess who their masters were without reference +to a catalogue. They have, through long work in America and under +American conditions, developed styles of their own bearing no +discoverable resemblance to the styles of their first instructors. To +take specific examples, who would imagine from the mural paintings of +Blashfield or the decorations by Mowbray in the University Club of New +York that either had been a pupil of Bonnat? Or who, looking at the +exquisite landscapes or delicate figure pieces of Weir, would find +anything to recall the name of Gérôme? Some of the pupils of Carolus +Duran are almost the only painters we have who acquired in their +school-days a distinctive method of work which still marks their +production, and even they are hardly distinguishable to-day from +others; for the method of Duran, as modified and exemplified by John +Sargent, has become the method of all the world, and a pupil of Carolus +simply paints in the modern manner, like the rest. Those American +painters who have adopted the impressionist point of view, again, have +modified its technic to suit their own purposes and are at least as +different from the Impressionists of France as are the Impressionists of +Scandinavia. We have painters who are undeniably influenced by Whistler, +but so have other countries—the school of Whistler is +international—and, after all, Whistler was an American. In short, the +resemblances between American painting and the painting of other +countries are to-day no greater than the resemblances between the +painting of any two of those countries. And I think the differences +between American painting and that of other countries are quite as +great as, if not greater than, the differences between the paintings of +any two of those countries.</p> + +<p>Another accusation that used to be heard against our painters has been +out-lived. We used to be told, with some truth, that we had learned to +paint but had nothing to say with our painting, that we produced +admirable studies but no pictures. The accusation never was true of our +landscape-painting. Whatever may be the final estimation of the works of +Inness and Wyant, there can be no doubt that they produced +pictures—things conceived and worked out to give one definite and +complete impression; things in which what was presented and what was +eliminated were equally determined by a definite purpose; things in +which accident and the immediate dominance of nature had little or no +part. As for Winslow Homer, whether in landscape or figure painting, his +work was unfailingly pictorial, whatever else it might be. He was a +great and original designer, and every canvas of his was completely and +definitely composed—a quality which at once removes from the category +of mere sketches and studies even his slighter and more rapid +productions. And our landscape-painters of to-day are equally painters +of pictures. Some of them might be thought, by a modern taste, too +conventionally painters of pictures—too much occupied with composition +and tone and other pictorial qualities at the expense of freshness of +observation—while our briskest and most original observers have, many +of them, a power of design and a manner of casting even their freshest +observations into pictorial form that is as admirable as it is +remarkable.</p> + +<p>No one could enter one of our exhibitions without feeling the definitely +pictorial quality of American landscape-painting, but these exhibitions +do less justice to the achievement of our figure-painters. The principal +reason for this is that many of our most serious figure-painters have +been so much occupied with mural decoration that their work seldom +appears in the exhibitions at all, while the work that they have done is +so scattered over our vast country that we rather forget its existence +and, assuredly, have little realization of its amount. It is one of the +defects of our exhibition system that work of this kind, while it is, of +course, on permanent exhibition in the place for which it is painted, is +hardly ever "exhibited," in the ordinary sense, in the centres where it +is produced. The regular visitor to the Paris salons might know almost +all that has been done in France in the way of mural painting. The +public of our American exhibitions knows only vaguely and by hearsay +what our mural painters have done and are doing. It is true that such +work is infinitely better seen in place, but it is a pity it cannot be +seen, even imperfectly, by the people who attend our exhibitions—people +who can rarely have the necessary knowledge to read such collections of +sketches, studies, and photographs as are shown at the exhibitions of +the Architectural League, where, alone, our mural painters can show +anything. If it were seen it would surely alter the estimation in which +American figure-painting is held. Such work as was done by the late John +La Farge, such work as is being done by Blashfield and Mowbray and +Simmons and a dozen others, if not, in the most limited sense of the +word, pictorial, is even further removed from the mere sketch or +study—the mere bit of good painting—than is the finest easel picture.</p> + +<p>But it is not only in mural decoration that serious figure-painting is +being done in this country. I do not see how any one can deny the name +of pictures to the genre paintings of Mr. Tarbell and Mr. Paxton unless +he is prepared to deny pictorial quality to the whole Dutch school of +the seventeenth century; and the example of these men is influencing a +number of others toward the production of thoroughly thought-out and +executed genre pictures. We have long had such serious figure-painters +as Thayer and Brush, Dewing and Weir. The late Louis Loeb was attempting +figure subjects of a very elaborate sort. To-day every exhibition shows +an increasing number of worthy efforts at figure-painting in either the +naturalistic or the ideal vein. We have pictures with subjects +intelligently chosen and intelligibly treated, pictures with a pattern +and a clear arrangement of line and mass, pictures soundly drawn and +harmoniously colored as well as admirably painted.</p> + +<p>The painters of America are no longer followers of foreign masters or +students learning technic and indifferent to anything else. They are a +school producing work differing in character from that of other schools +and at least equal in quality to that of any school existing to-day.</p> + +<p>If so much may be taken as proved, the question remains for +consideration: What are the characteristics of the American school of +painting? Its most striking characteristic is one that may be considered +a fault or a virtue according to the point of view and the +prepossessions of the observer. It is a characteristic that has +certainly been a cause of the relatively small success of American work +at recent international exhibitions. The American school is, among the +schools of to-day, singularly old-fashioned. This characteristic has, +undoubtedly, puzzled and repelled the foreigner. It is a time when the +madness for novelty seems to be carrying everything before it, when +anything may be accepted so long as it is or seems new, when the effort +of all artists is to get rid of conventions and to shake off the +"shackles of tradition." Here is a new people in the blessed state of +having no traditions to shake off and from whom, therefore, some peppery +wildness might be expected for the tickling of jaded palates. Behold, +they are sturdily setting themselves to recover for art the things the +others have thrown away! They are trying to revive the old fashion of +thoughtful composition, the old fashion of good drawing, the old fashion +of lovely color, and the old fashion of sound and beautiful workmanship.</p> + +<p>This conservatism of American painting, however, is not of the kind that +still marks so much of the painting of England. Excepting exceptions, +English painting is somewhat stolidly staying where it was. America's +conservatism is ardent, determined, living. It is not standing still; +it is going somewhere as rapidly as possible—it might, perhaps, be more +truly called not conservatism but reaction. We have, of course, our +ultramodernists, but their audacities are mild compared to those of the +French or German models they imitate. We have, even more of course, the +followers of the easiest way—the practitioners of current and accepted +methods who are alike everywhere. But our most original and most +distinguished painters, those who give the tone to our exhibitions and +the national accent to our school, are almost all engaged in trying to +get back one or another of the qualities that marked the great art of +the past. They have gone back of the art of the day and are retying the +knots that should bind together the art of all ages.</p> + +<p>This tendency shows itself strongly even in those whose work seems, at +first sight, most purely naturalistic or impressionistic. Among those +of our painters who have adopted and retained the impressionist technic, +with its hatching of broken colors, the two most notable are Mr. Hassam +and Mr. Weir. But Mr. Hassam, at his best, is a designer with a sense of +balance and of classic grace almost equal to that of Corot, and he often +uses the impressionist method to express otherwise the delicate shimmer +of thin foliage that Corot loved. Nay, so little is he a pure +naturalist, he cannot resist letting the white sides of naked nymphs +gleam among his tree trunks—he cannot refrain from the artist's +immemorial dream of Arcady. As for Mr. Weir, surely nothing could be +more unlike the instantaneousness of true impressionism than his +long-brooded-over, subtle-toned, infinitely sensitive art.</p> + +<p>There is little dreaminess in the work of Mr. Tarbell and the growing +number of his followers. Theirs is almost a pure naturalism, a "making +it like." Yet, notably in the work of Mr. Tarbell himself, and to some +extent in that of the others, there is an elegance of arrangement, a +thoroughness in the notation of gradations of light, a beauty and a +charm that were learned of no modern. Their art is an effort to bring +back the artistic quality of the most artistic naturalism ever +practised, that of Vermeer of Delft.</p> + +<p>Others of our artists are going still further back in the history of art +for a part of their inspiration. Mr. Brush has always been a linealist +and a student of form, but his earlier canvases, admirable as they were, +were those of a docile pupil of Gérôme applying the thoroughness of +Gérôme's method to a new range of subjects and painting the American +Indian as Gérôme had painted the modern Egyptian. In recent years each +new picture of his has shown more clearly the influence of the early +Italians—each has been more nearly a symphony of pure line.</p> + +<p>Even in purely technical matters our painters have been experimenting +backward, trying to recover lost technical beauties. The last pictures +of Louis Loeb were underpainted throughout in monochrome, the final +colors being applied in glazes and rubbings, and to-day a number of +others, landscape and figure painters, are attempting to restore and +master this, the pure Venetian method, while still others, among them +Emil Carlsen, are reviving the use of tempera.</p> + +<p>But it is in our mural painting even more than elsewhere that the +conservative or reactionary tendency of American painting is most +clearly marked. John La Farge was always himself, but when the general +movement in mural painting began in this country with the Chicago +World's Fair and the subsequent decoration of the Library of Congress, +the rest of us were much under the influence of Puvis de Chavannes. Even +then the design was not his, but was founded on earlier examples of +decorative composition, but his pale tones were everywhere. Little by +little the study of the past has taught us better. American mural +painting has grown steadily more monumental in design, and at the same +time it has grown richer and fuller in color. To-day, while it is not +less but more personal and original than it was, it has more kinship +with the noble achievements of Raphael and Veronese than has any other +modern work extant.</p> + +<p>And this brings us to the second characteristic of the American school +of painting: it is rapidly becoming a school of color. We have still +plenty of painters who work in the blackish or chalky or muddy and +opaque tones of modern art, but I think we have more men who produce +rich and powerful color and more men who produce subtle and delicate +color than any other modern school. The experiments in reviving old +technical methods have been undertaken for the sake of purity and +luminosity of color and have largely succeeded. The pictures of Mr. +Tarbell are far more colored than those of the European painter whose +work is, in some ways, most analogous to his, M. Joseph Bail. Mr. +Hassam's color is always sparkling and brilliant, Mr. Dewing's delicate +and charming, Mr. Weir's subtle and harmonious and sometimes very full. +Even Mr. Brush's linear arrangements are clothed in sombre but often +richly harmonious tones, and the decorative use of powerful color is the +main reliance of such painters as Hugo Ballin. But the note of color +runs through the school and one hardly needs to name individual men. +Whether our landscapists glaze and scumble with the tonalists, or use +some modification of the impressionist hatching, it is for the sake of +color; and even our most forthright and dashing wielders of the big +brush often achieve a surprising power of resonant coloring.</p> + +<p>Power, fulness, and beauty of coloring are hardly modern qualities. Much +as impressionism has been praised for restoring color to a colorless +art, its result has been, too often, to substitute whitishness for +blackishness. Color has characterized no modern painting since that of +Delacroix and Millet as it characterizes much of the best American +painting. The love for and the success in color of our school is, after +all, a part of its conservatism.</p> + +<p>It may seem an odd way of praising a modern school to call it the least +modern of any. It <i>would</i> be an odd way of praising that school if its +lack of modernness were a mere matter of lagging behind or of standing +still and marking time. But if the "march of progress" has been +down-hill—if the path that is trod leads into a swamp or over a +precipice—then there may be most hopefulness for those who can 'bout +face and march the other way. I have, elsewhere in this volume, given at +some length some of my reasons for thinking that modern art has been +following a false route and is in danger of perishing in the bog or +falling over the cliff. If it is so we may congratulate ourselves that +those of our painters who are still following the rest of the world have +not so nearly reached the end of the road, and that those who are more +independent have discovered in time what that end is and have turned +back.</p> + +<p>It is because it is least that of to-day that I believe our art may be +that of to-morrow—it is because it is, of all art now going, that which +has most connection with the past that I hope the art of America may +prove to be the art of the future.</p> + + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="VII" id="VII"></a>VII</h2> + +<h2>AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS<a name="FNanchor_C_3" id="FNanchor_C_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_C_3" class="fnanchor">[C]</a></h2> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_C_3" id="Footnote_C_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_C_3"><span class="label">[C]</span></a> Address delivered before the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and +Sciences on February 22, 1908. Now revised and enlarged.</p></div> + + +<p>Augustus Saint-Gaudens was born in Dublin, Ireland, on the first day of +March, 1848, but was brought to America at the age of six months. His +childhood and youth were passed in the city of New York, as was a great +part of his working life; and though his origin was foreign, lifelong +associations had stamped him indelibly an American. The greater part of +his work was done in America; almost all of it was done for America; and +I do not think it is fancy that sees in his art the expression of a +distinctively American spirit. Yet from his mixed French and Irish +blood he may well have derived that mingling of the Latin sense of form +with a Celtic depth of sentiment which was so markedly characteristic of +his genius.</p> + +<p>His father, Bernard Paul Ernest Saint-Gaudens, was a shoemaker from the +little town of Aspet in Haute-Garonne, only a few miles from the town of +Saint-Gaudens, from which the family must have drawn its origin and its +name. His mother was Mary McGuinness, a native of Dublin. Augustus +Saint-Gaudens was one of several children born to this couple and not +the only artist among them, for his younger brother Louis also attained +some reputation as a sculptor, though his entire lack of ambition +prevented his achieving all that was expected of him by those who knew +his delicate talent. The boy Augustus attended the public schools of New +York and received there all the formal education he ever had; but at +thirteen it was necessary for him to face the problem of earning his +living. His artistic proclivities were probably already well marked, and +to give them some scope, while assuring him a regular trade at which +money could be earned, he was apprenticed in the good old way to a cameo +cutter named Louis Avet, said to be the first man to cut stone cameos in +the United States. Thus it came about that the greatest of American +sculptors had much such a practical apprenticeship as a Florentine of +the fifteenth century might have had. He himself always spoke of it as +"one of the most fortunate things that ever happened to him" and +attributed much of his success to the habit of faithful labor acquired +at this time. Probably, also, the habit of thinking in terms of relief, +fostered by years of work at this ancient art, was not without influence +in the moulding of his talent.</p> + +<p>His relations with Avet lasted from 1861 to 1864, when his master +quarrelled with him and abruptly dismissed him from his shop. The boy +was already a determined person; he believed that he had suffered an +injustice, and, though Avet went to his parents and tried to induce them +to send him back, he refused to return. A new master was found for him +in the person of a shell-cameo cutter named Jules LeBrethon, and with +him Saint-Gaudens remained three years. During his six years' +apprenticeship under his two masters the youth showed already that +energy and power of will that made him what he was. He meant to be +something more than an artisan, and he spent his evenings in the +classes, first of the Cooper Union, afterward of the National Academy of +Design, in the hard study of drawing, the true foundation of all the +fine arts. It was one of the elements of his superiority in his +profession that he could draw as few sculptors can, and he always felt +that he owed an especial debt to the Cooper Union, which he was glad to +repay when he modelled the statue of its venerable founder. Of the other +institution by whose freely given instruction he had profited, the +National Academy of Design, he became one of the most honored members. +By 1867, when he was nineteen years old, he had saved a little money and +was master of a trade that could be relied on to bring in more, and he +determined to go to Paris and begin the serious study of sculpture. He +worked, for a time, at the Petite École, and entered the studio of +Jouffroy in the École des Beaux-Arts in 1868, remaining until 1870. +During this time, and afterward, he was self-supporting, working half +his time at cameo cutting until his efforts at sculpture on a larger +scale began to bring in an income.</p> + +<p>When the Franco-Prussian War broke out Paris ceased to be a place for +the carrying on of the serious study of art, and Saint-Gaudens went to +Rome, where his associates were the French prizemen of the day, of whom +Mercié was one. He remained there until 1874, except for a visit to New +York in the winter of 1872-3 for the purpose of modelling a bust of +Senator Evarts, and one or two other busts, which were put into marble +upon his return to Rome. In those Roman days he executed his first +statue, a "Hiawatha," one of his few studies of the nude, and a +"Silence," a not very characteristic draped figure which yet fills with +some impressiveness her niche at the head of the grand stairway of the +Masonic Temple on Twenty-fourth Street.</p> + +<p>From 1875 to 1877 he had a studio in New York, where he seems to have +executed some of his earliest portrait reliefs. During these years he +came into contact with La Farge, for whom he turned painter and aided +in the execution of the decorations of Trinity Church in Boston. It was +at this time, also, that he received his first commissions for important +public work, those for the Farragut statue in Madison Square, the +Randall at Sailors' Snug Harbor, and the angels for Saint Thomas's +Church. He had married Augusta F. Homer in 1877, and in that year, +taking his bride and his commissions with him, he returned to Paris, +feeling, as many another young Paris-bred artist has felt, that there +only could such important works be properly carried out. The "Farragut" +was completed and exhibited in the plaster at the Salon of 1880, and +from that time his success was assured. For the rest of his life he was +constantly busy, receiving almost more commissions for work of +importance than it was possible for him to carry out. He returned to New +York in 1880, and in 1881 he opened the studio in Thirty-sixth Street, +where he remained for sixteen years and where so many of his greatest +works were executed. From that studio came many of his exquisite +portraits in relief, his caryatids and angelic figures, such as those +for the Morgan tomb, so unfortunately destroyed by fire in 1882 (a fate +since shared by the earlier angels of Saint Thomas's), the great statues +of Lincoln and Chapin, the "Shaw Memorial," and the "Adams Memorial"; +and in it was done all the preliminary work of the great equestrian +monument to General Sherman.</p> + +<p>It is in these years of his prime that he will ever be most fondly +remembered by those—and they are many—who had the privilege of his +friendship. Admittedly our foremost sculptor, and one of the founders of +the Society of American Artists, he became at once a person of +importance in the world of art; and as his brilliant career developed +he established intimate relationships with an ever-widening circle of +men in every walk of life, while no one who ever knew him well can have +felt anything but an abiding affection for him. That long, white studio +became a familiar meeting-place for all who were interested in any form +of art; and the Sunday afternoon concerts that were held there for many +years will be looked back to with regret as long as any of their +auditors remain alive.</p> + +<p>This studio was given up when Saint-Gaudens went abroad for the third +time, in 1897, to execute the Sherman group, and he never resumed his +residence in New York. In 1885 he had purchased a property at Cornish, +N.H., just across the Connecticut River from Windsor, Vt., and when he +returned to this country in 1900, covered with fresh honors but an ill +man, he made what had been a summer home his permanent abode. He named +it Aspet, after his father's birthplace, and there he erected two +studios and finished his Sherman statue. In these studios were executed +the second "Lincoln," the Parnell statue for Dublin, and much other +work. The larger studio was burned in 1904, but was rebuilt and the lost +work re-begun and carried to a conclusion. What can never be quite +replaced were two portraits of himself. A study, of the head only, in +the collection of the National Academy of Design and a sketch by Will H. +Low, painted in Paris in 1877, are now the only existing portraits of +him done from life in his best years. The Metropolitan Museum possesses +a portrait of him in his last years, by Miss Ellen Emmet, and a replica, +painted since his death, of my own earlier portrait.</p> + +<p>From the illness he brought back from Paris in 1900 Saint-Gaudens never +recovered. At times he showed something of his old vigor and was able +not only to do fine work but to indulge more in out-of-door sports than +he had ever done in his youth, while a growing love for nature and for +literature made his life fuller, in some respects, than in the days when +his own art more entirely absorbed him. But year by year his strength +grew less and his intervals of freedom from pain grew shorter, and he +was more and more forced to rely upon the corps of able and devoted +assistants which he gathered about him. He developed to an extraordinary +extent the faculty of communicating his ideas and desires to others and +of producing through their hands work essentially his own and of a +quality entirely beyond their ability; but it was at the cost of a +strain upon brain and nerve almost infinitely greater than would have +been involved in work done with his own hand. In the summer of 1906 he +broke down utterly, the work of his studio was interrupted, and he +ceased to see even his most intimate friends. He rallied somewhat from +this attack, and began again his heroic struggle against fate, directing +the work of assistants while himself so weak that he had to be carried +from the house to the studio. The end came on the evening of August 3, +1907. He died as he had lived, a member of no church, but a man of pure +and lofty character. As he had wished, his body was cremated, and his +ashes were temporarily deposited in the cemetery at Windsor, Vt., across +the river from his home. An informal funeral service was held in his +private studio on August 7, attended by friends and neighbors and by a +few old friends from a distance; but the gathering could include but a +few of the many who felt his death as a personal loss.</p> + +<p>The merits of Saint-Gaudens's work were fully recognized in his +lifetime. He was an officer of the Legion of Honor, a Corresponding +Member of the Institute of France, a member of half a dozen academies, +and the bearer of honorary degrees from the universities of Harvard, +Yale, and Princeton. But of all the honors he received there were two, +one of a public, the other of a private nature, which he himself valued +most highly: the one as showing the estimation in which his art was held +by his fellow artists, the other as an evidence of the personal +affection felt for him by his friends. At the Pan-American Exposition in +1901, upon the unanimous recommendation of the Jury of Fine Arts, +composed of painters, sculptors, and architects, he was awarded a +special diploma and medal of honor, "apart from and above all other +awards," an entirely exceptional honor, which marked him as the first of +American artists, as previously received honors had marked him one of +the greatest sculptors of his time. On June 23, 1905, the artistic and +literary colony which had gradually grown up about his home in Cornish +celebrated the twentieth anniversary of his coming there by a fête and +open-air masque held in the groves of Aspet. The beauty of this +spectacle has become almost legendary. The altar with its columned +canopy, which served for a background to the play, still stands, or +recently stood, though much dilapidated by weather, as it was +immortalized by the sculptor himself in a commemorative plaquette (Pl. +23) which is among the most charming of his minor works. He planned if +he had lived to perpetuate it in enduring marble, and this task has now +been taken up by his wife, who means to dedicate the monument as a +fitting memorial to a great artist and a noble man in the place he loved +as his chosen home.</p> + +<p>Some part of the vivid and lovable personality of Augustus +Saint-Gaudens must have been visible, almost at a glance, to any one who +ever came in contact with him—to any one, even, who ever saw his +portrait. In his spare but strong-knit figure, his firm but supple +hands, his manner of carrying himself, his every gesture, one felt the +abounding vitality, the almost furious energy of the man. That +extraordinary head, with its heavy brow beetling above the small but +piercing eyes, its red beard and crisp, wiry hair, its projecting jaw +and great, strongly modelled nose, was alive with power—with power of +intellect no less than of will. His lack of early education gave him a +certain diffidence and a distrust of his own gifts of expression. He was +apt to overrate the mere verbal facility of others and to underestimate +himself in the comparison—indeed, a certain humility was strongly +marked in him, even as regards his art, though he was self-confident +also. When he was unconstrained his great powers of observation, his +shrewdness of judgment, his bubbling humor, and a picturesque vivacity +of phrase not uncommon among artists made him one of the most entrancing +of talkers.</p> + +<p><a name="p23_t" id="p23_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 247px;"> + +<a href="images/p23.jpg"> +<img src="images/p23_t.jpg" width="247" height="400" alt="Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 23.—Saint-Gaudens. "Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque."" title="Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 23.—Saint-Gaudens. "Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque."</span> +</div> + +<p>Underneath his humor and his gayety, however, there lay a deep-seated +Celtic melancholy, and beside his energy was an infinite patience at the +service of an exacting artistic conscience. The endless painstaking of +his work and the time he took over it were almost proverbial. He was +twelve years engaged upon the "Shaw Memorial" and eleven upon the +"Sherman," and, though he did much other work while these were in +progress, yet it was his constant revision, his ever-renewed striving +for perfection that kept them so long achieving. The "Diana" of the +Madison Square Garden was taken down from her tower because he and the +architect, Stanford White, thought her too large, and was entirely +remodelled on a smaller scale. And with this patience went a gentleness, +a sweetness, a delicate sensitiveness, and an abounding humanity and +sympathy. He could be almost ruthless in the assertion of his will when +the interests of his art or of justice seemed to demand it, yet there +was a tender-heartedness in him which made it distressing to him to +inflict pain on any one. The conflict of these elements in his nature +sometimes made his actions seem inconsistent and indecipherable even to +those who knew him. He would be long-suffering, compromising, +disinclined to strike; but when he was at last roused the blow would be +as staggering as it was unexpected. It was as if he struck the harder to +have done with it and to spare himself the pain of striking again.</p> + +<p>It was his whole-hearted devotion to his art which caused his rare acts +of self-assertion, and it was this same devotion, no less than his +natural kindliness, that made him ever helpful to younger artists who +showed any promise of future worth. Even in his last days of unspeakable +suffering he would summon what was left of his old strength to give a +word of criticism and advice, above all, a word of commendation, to any +one who needed the one or had earned the other. The essential goodness +of the man was most felt by those who stood nearest him, and most of +all, perhaps, by his actual coworkers. He could command, as few have +been able to do, the love and devotion of his assistants. To all who +knew him the man himself seemed finer, rarer, sweeter than his work, and +the gap he has left in their lives will be even more impossible to fill +than his place in American art.</p> + +<p>But the personality of an artist, though he be a great one, is for the +memory of his private friends. It is only as it colors his art that it +is of public interest. It is his art itself, his gift to the world, that +the world cares for; it is of the kind and quality of that art, the +nature and the degree of its greatness, that the world wishes to hear. +Because the man was my friend I have wished to give some glimpse of the +manner of man he was; because the artist was the greatest our country +has produced I am to try to give some idea of his art, of the elements +of its strength, and of the limitations which are as necessary as its +qualities.</p> + +<p>The time of Saint-Gaudens's study in Paris was a time of great +importance in the development of modern sculpture, and, although +Jouffroy was not himself a sculptor of the highest rank, his studio was +a centre for what was then the new movement in the sculpture of France. +The essential thing in this movement was the abandoning of the formal +imitation of second-rate antiques and the substitution of the sculpture +of the Italian Renaissance as a source of inspiration and of the direct +study of nature as a means of self-expression. There had always been +individual sculptors of power and originality in France, but the +movement of the French school of sculpture, as a whole, away from the +pseudo classicism which had long dominated it was really inaugurated by +Paul Dubois only a few years before Saint-Gaudens's arrival in Paris. +Many of the men destined to a brilliant part in the history of modern +sculpture were trained in the <i>atelier</i> of Jouffroy. Falguière and +Saint-Marceau had but just left that studio when the young American +entered it, and Mercié was his fellow student there. Dalou and Rodin +have since made these men seem old-fashioned and academic, but they +were then, and for many years afterward, the heads of the new school; +and of this new school, so different from anything he had known in +America, Saint-Gaudens inevitably became a part. His own pronounced +individuality, and perhaps his comparative isolation during the years of +his greatest productivity, gave his art a character of its own, unlike +any other, but to the French school of sculpture of the third quarter of +the nineteenth century he essentially belonged.</p> + +<p>Of course, his style was not formed in a moment. His "Hiawatha" seems, +to-day, much such a piece of neo-classicism as was being produced by +other men in the Rome of that time, and the "Silence," though somewhat +more modern in accent, is an academic work such as might have been +expected from a docile pupil of his master. The relief of angels for the +reredos of Saint Thomas's Church is the earliest important work which +shows his personal manner. It was undertaken in collaboration with John +La Farge, and perhaps the influence of La Farge, and of that eminently +picturesque genius Stanford White, mingled with that of the younger +French school in forming its decorative and almost pictorial character. +It was a kind of improvisation, done at prodigious speed and without +study from nature—a sketch rather than a completed work of art, but a +sketch to be slowly developed into the reliefs of the Farragut pedestal, +the angels of the Morgan tomb, the caryatids of the Vanderbilt +mantelpiece, and, at length, into such a masterpiece as the +"Amor-Caritas." In each of these developments the work becomes less +picturesque and more formal, the taste is purified, the exuberance of +decorative feeling is more restrained. The final term is reached in the +caryatids for the Albright Gallery at Buffalo—works of his last days, +when his hands were no longer able to shape the clay, yet essentially +his though he never touched them; works of an almost austere nobility of +style, the most grandly monumental figures he ever produced.</p> + +<p>The commonest criticism on Saint-Gaudens's art has been that it is not, +primarily, sculptural in its inspiration; and, in a sense, the criticism +is justified. One need not, perhaps, greatly care whether it is true or +not. It is, after all, only a matter of definition, and if we were +forbidden to call his work sculpture at all and required to find another +name for it, the important fact that it is art—art of the finest, the +most exquisite, at times the most powerful—would in no wise be altered. +Ghiberti went beyond the traditions of sculpture in relief, introduced +perspective into his compositions, modelled trees and rocks and clouds +and cast them in bronze, made pictures, if you like, instead of reliefs. +Does any one care? Is it not enough that they are beautiful pictures? +The gates of the Baptistry of Florence are still worthy, as the greatest +sculptor since the Greeks thought them, to be the gates of paradise. A +work of art remains a work of art, call it what you please, and a thing +of beauty will be a joy forever, whether or not you can pigeonhole it in +some ready-made category. After all, the critical pigeonholes are made +for the things, not the things for the pigeonholes. The work is there, +and if it does not fit your preconceived definition the fault is as +likely to be in the definition as in the work itself.</p> + +<p>And the first and most essential thing to note about the art of Augustus +Saint-Gaudens is that it is always art of the purest—free in an +extraordinary degree from the besetting sins of naturalism and the +scientific temper on the one hand and of the display of cleverness and +technical brilliancy on the other. Never more than in our own day have +these been the great temptations of an able artist: that he should in +the absorption of study forget the end in the means and produce +demonstrations of anatomy or of the laws of light rather than statues or +pictures; or that he should, in the joy of exercising great talents, +seem to say, "See how well I can do it!" and invent difficulties for the +sake of triumphantly resolving them, becoming a virtuoso rather than a +creator. Of the meaner temptation of mere sensationalism—the desire to +attract attention by ugliness and eccentricity lest one should be unable +to secure it by truth and beauty—one need not speak. It is the +temptation of vulgar souls. But great and true artists have yielded, +occasionally or habitually, to these other two; Saint-Gaudens never +does. I know no work of his to which raw nature has been admitted, in +which a piece of study has been allowed to remain as such without the +moulding touch of art to subdue it to its place; and I know only one +which has any spice of bravura—the Logan statue—and the bravura is +there because the subject seemed to demand it, not because the artist +wished it. The dash and glitter are those of "Black Jack Logan," not of +Saint-Gaudens. The sculptor strove to render them as he strove to render +higher qualities at other times, but they remain antipathetic to his +nature, and the statue is one of the least satisfactory of his works. He +is essentially the artist—the artificer of beauty—ever bent on the +making of a lovely and significant thing; and the study of nature and +the resources of his craft are but tools and are never allowed to become +anything more.</p> + +<p>If, then, the accusation that Saint-Gaudens's art is not sculptural +means that he was a designer rather than a modeller, that he cared for +composition more than for representation, that the ensemble interested +him more than the details, I would cheerfully admit that the accusation +is well founded. Such marvels of rendering as Rodin could give us, +before he lost himself in the effort to deserve that reputation as a +profound thinker which has been thrust upon him, were not for +Saint-Gaudens. The modelling of the <i>morceau</i> was not particularly his +affair. The discrimination of hard and soft, of bone and muscle and +integument, the expression of tension where a fleshy tissue is tightly +drawn over the framework beneath, or of weight where it falls away from +it—these were not the things that most compelled his interest or in +which he was most successful. For the human figure as a figure, for the +inherent beauty of its marvellous mechanism, he did not greatly care. +The problems of bulk and mass and weight and movement which have +occupied sculptors from the beginning were not especially his problems. +It may have been due to the nature of the commissions he received that, +after the "Hiawatha" of his student days, he modelled no nude except the +"Diana" of the tower—a purely decorative figure, designed for distant +effect, in which structural modelling would have been out of place +because invisible. But it was not accident that in such draped figures +as the "Amor-Caritas" (Pl. 24) or the caryatids of the Vanderbilt +mantelpiece there is little effort to make the figure visible beneath +the draperies. In the hands of a master of the figure—of one of those +artists to whom the expressiveness and the beauty of the human structure +is all in all—drapery is a means of rendering the masses and the +movement of the figure more apparent than they would be in the nude. In +such works as these it is a thing beautiful in itself, for its own +ripple and flow and ordered intricacy. The figure is there beneath +the drapery, but the drapery is expressive of the mood of the artist and +of the sentiment of the work rather than especially explanatory of the +figure.</p> + +<p><a name="p24_t" id="p24_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 207px;"> + +<a href="images/p24.jpg"> +<img src="images/p24_t.jpg" width="207" height="400" alt="Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 24.—Saint-Gaudens. "Amor Caritas."" title="Amor Caritas" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 24.—Saint-Gaudens. "Amor Caritas."</span> +</div> + +<p>First of all, by nature and by training, Saint-Gaudens was a designer, +and exquisiteness of design was the quality he most consciously strove +for—the quality on which he expended his unresting, unending, +persevering toil. From the start one feels that design is his principal +preoccupation, that he is thinking mainly of the pattern of the whole, +its decorative effect and play of line, its beauty of masses and spaces, +its fitness for its place and its surroundings; in a word, its +composition. In the beginning, as a workman in the shop of the cameo +cutter, he was concerned with a kind of art in which perfection of +composition is almost the sole claim to serious consideration. Then he +produces a multiplicity of small reliefs, dainty, exquisite, infallibly +charming in their arrangement—things which are so dependent on design +for their very existence that they seem scarcely modelled at all. He +goes on to decorative figures in the round, to heroic statues, to +monumental groups, but always it is design that he thinks of first and +last—design, now, in three dimensions rather than in two—design +properly sculptural rather than pictorial, in so much as it deals with +bosses and concaves, with solid matter in space—but still design. This +power of design rises to higher uses as time goes on, is bent to the +interpretation of lofty themes and the expression of deep emotions, but +it is in its nature the same power that produced the delicate, ethereal +beauty of the reliefs. The infinite fastidiousness of a master designer, +constantly reworking and readjusting his design, that every part shall +be perfect and that no fold or spray of leafage shall be out of its +proper place, never satisfied that his composition is beyond improvement +while an experiment remains untried—this is what cost him years of +labor. His first important statue, the "Farragut," is a masterpiece of +restrained and elegant yet original and forceful design—a design, too, +that includes the pedestal and the bench below, and of which the figures +in bas-relief are almost as important a part as the statue itself. In +later and maturer work, with a more clarified taste and a deeper +feeling, he can reach such unsurpassable expressiveness of composition +as is shown in the "Shaw Memorial" or the great equestrian statue of +Sherman.</p> + +<p>Saint-Gaudens's mastery of low relief was primarily a matter of this +power of design, but it was conditioned also upon two other qualities: +knowledge of drawing and extreme sensitiveness to delicate modulation of +surface. And by drawing I mean not merely knowledge of form and +proportion and the exact rendering of these, in which sense a statue may +be said to be well drawn if its measurements are correct—I mean that +much more subtle and difficult art, the rendering in two dimensions only +of the appearance of objects of three dimensions. Sculpture in the round +is the simplest and, in a sense, the easiest of the arts. It deals with +actual form—a piece of sculpture does not merely look like the form of +an object, it <i>is</i> the form of an object. Leaving out of the count, for +the moment, the refinements and the illusions which may be added to +it—which must be added to it to make it art—it is the reproduction in +another material of the actual forms of things. Something which shall +answer for it, to the uninitiate, may be produced by merely casting +natural objects; and there is a great deal that is called sculpture +which scarcely aims at anything more than the production, by a more +difficult method, of something like a plaster cast from nature. It is +the very simplicity of the art that makes its difficulty, for to avoid +the look of casting and achieve the feeling of art requires the most +delicate handling and the most powerful inspiration, and there is need +in the art of sculpture for the rarest qualities of the greatest minds. +The art of drawing is entirely different. It is all illusion, it deals +only in appearances. Its aim is to depict on a flat surface the aspect +of objects supposed to stand behind it and to be seen through it, and +its means are two branches of the science of optics. It is based on the +study of perspective and on the study of the way light falls upon +objects and reveals their shapes and the direction of their surfaces by +the varying degrees of their illumination. Of this art a sculptor in the +round need not necessarily know anything, and, in fact, many of them, +unfortunately, know altogether too little of it. The maker of a statue +need not think about foreshortenings: if he gives the correct form the +foreshortening will take care of itself. Sometimes it does so in a +disastrous manner! Theoretically he need not worry over light and shade, +although of course he does, in practice, think about it and rely upon +it, more or less. If he gives the true forms they will necessarily have +the true light and shade. But low relief, standing between sculpture and +drawing, is really more closely related to drawing than to sculpture—is +really a kind of drawing—and this is why so few sculptors succeed in +it.</p> + +<p>It is a kind of drawing but an exceedingly difficult kind—the most +delicate and difficult of any of the arts that deal with form alone. As +to the contour, it stands on the same ground with drawing in any other +material. The linear part of it requires exactly the same degree and +the same kind of talent as linear design with a pen or with a burin. But +for all that stands within the contour, for the suggestion of interior +forms and the illusion of solidity, it depends on means of the utmost +subtlety. It exists, as all drawing does, by light and shade, but the +shadows are not produced by the mere darkening of the surface—they are +produced by projections and recessions, by the inclination of the planes +away from or toward the light. The lower the relief the more subtle and +tender must be the variation of the surface which produces them, and +therefore success in relief is one of the best attainable measures of a +sculptor's fineness of touch and perfection of craftsmanship. But as the +light and shade is produced by actual forms which are yet quite unlike +the true forms of nature, it follows that the artist in relief can never +imitate either the shape or the depth of the shadow he sees in nature. +His art becomes one of suggestions and equivalents—an art which can +give neither the literal truth of form nor the literal truth of +aspect—an art at the farthest remove from direct representation. And +success in it becomes, therefore, one of the best tests of a sculptor's +artistry—of his ability to produce essential beauty by the treatment of +his material, rather than to imitate successfully external fact.</p> + +<p>As the degree of relief varies, also, from the lowest possible to that +highest relief which, nearly approaches sculpture in the round, the +problems involved constantly vary. At each stage there is a new +compromise to be made, a new adjustment to find, between fact and +illusion, between the real form and the desired appearance. And there +may be a number of different degrees of relief in the same work, even in +different parts of the same figure, so that the art of relief becomes +one of the most complicated and difficult of arts. It has not, indeed, +the added complication of color, but neither has it the resources of +color, success in which will more or less compensate for failure +elsewhere. There is no permissible failure in bas-relief, any more than +in sculpture in the round, and its difficulties are far greater. Nothing +but truest feeling, completest knowledge, consummate skill will serve.</p> + +<p>This explanation may give some measure of what I mean when I say that I +believe Augustus Saint-Gaudens the most complete master of relief since +the fifteenth century.</p> + +<p>He has produced a series of works which run through the whole range of +the art, from lowest relief to highest; from things of which the relief +is so infinitesimal that they seem as if dreamed into existence rather +than wrought in bronze or marble to things which are virtually engaged +statues; from things which you fear a chance touch might brush away, +like a pastel of Whistler's, to things as solid and enduring in +appearance as in actual material. And in all these things there is the +same inevitable mastery of design and of drawing, the same infinite +resource and the same technical perfection. The "Butler Children" (Pl. +25), the "Schiff Children," the "Sarah Redwood Lee" (Pl. 26), to name +but a few of his masterpieces of this kind, are in their perfection of +spacing, their grace of line, their exquisite and ethereal illusiveness +of surface, comparable only to the loveliest works of the Florentine +Renaissance; while the assured mastery of the most complicated problems +of relief evinced in the "Shaw Memorial"—a mastery which shows, in the +result, no trace of the strenuous and long-continued effort that it +cost—is unsurpassed—I had almost said unequalled—in any work of any +epoch.</p> + +<p><a name="p25_t" id="p25_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 333px;"> + +<a href="images/p25.jpg"> +<img src="images/p25_t.jpg" width="333" height="350" alt="Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 25.—Saint-Gaudens. "The Butler Children."" title="The Butler Children" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 25.—Saint-Gaudens. "The Butler Children."</span> +</div> + +<p>Illustration can give but a faint idea of the special beauties of this +or that particular work in this long series. It can show no more than +the composition and the draughtsmanship. The refinement of workmanship, +the sensitiveness and subtlety of modelling, can be appreciated only +before the works themselves. And this sensitiveness and delicacy of +workmanship, this mastery of the problems of relief, with its reliance +on illusion and its necessary abstention from realization, is applied to +sculpture in the round, and becomes with Saint-Gaudens, as it did with +the sculptors of the Florentine Renaissance, the means of escape from +the matter of fact. The concrete art of sculpture becomes an art of +mystery and of suggestion—an art having affinities with that of +painting. Hollows are filled up, shadows are obliterated, lines are +softened or accentuated, as the effect may require, details are +eliminated or made prominent as they are less or more essential and +significant, as they hinder or aid the expressiveness of the whole. It +is by such methods that beauty is achieved, that the most unpromising +material is subdued to the purposes of art, that even our hideous modern +costume may be made to yield a decorative effect. Pure sculpture, as the +ancients understood it, the art of form <i>per se</i>, demands the nude +figure, or a costume which reveals it rather than hides it. The costume +of to-day reveals as little of the figure as possible, and, unlike +mediæval armor, it has no beauty of its own. A painter may make it +interesting by dwelling on color or tone or texture, or may so lose it +in shadow that it ceases to count at all except as a space of darkness. +A sculptor can do none of these things, and if he is to make it serve +the ends of beauty he has need of all the resourcefulness and all the +skill of the master of low relief. It was fortunate that the artist +whose greatest task was to commemorate the heroes of the Civil War +should have had the temperament and the training of such a master, and I +know of no other sculptor than Saint-Gaudens who has so magnificently +succeeded in the rendering of modern clothing—no other who could have +made the uniform of Farragut or the frock coat of Lincoln as interesting +as the armor of Colleone or the toga of Augustus.</p> + +<p><a name="p26_t" id="p26_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 206px;"> + +<a href="images/p26.jpg"> +<img src="images/p26_t.jpg" width="206" height="400" alt="Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 26.—Saint-Gaudens. "Sarah Redwood Lee."" title="Sarah Redwood Lee" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 26.—Saint-Gaudens. "Sarah Redwood Lee."</span> +</div> + +<p>But if the genius of Saint-Gaudens was primarily a decorative genius—if +it was, even, in his earlier work, a trifle picturesque, so that, as he +said himself, he had "to fight against picturesqueness," his work was +never pictorial. He never indulged in perspective or composed his +reliefs on more than one plane; never took such liberties with the +traditions of sculpture as did Ghiberti, or painted pictures in bronze +or marble as more than one modern has done. His very feeling for +decoration kept him from pictorial realism, and his fight against +picturesqueness was nobly won. His design becomes ever cleaner and more +classic; by years of work and of experience he becomes stronger and +stronger in the more purely sculptural qualities—attains a grasp of +form and structure only second to his mastery of composition. He is +always a consummate artist—in his finest works he is a great sculptor +in the strictest sense of the word.</p> + +<p>I have dwelt somewhat at length upon technical matters because technical +power is the first necessity for an artist; because technical mastery is +that for which he consciously endeavors; because the technical language +of his art is the necessary vehicle of expression for his thoughts and +emotions, and determines, even, the nature of the thoughts and emotions +he shall express. But while the technical accomplishment of an artist +is the most necessary part of his art, without which his imagination +would be mute, it is not the highest or the most significant part of it. +I have tried to show that Saint-Gaudens was a highly accomplished +artist, the equal of any of his contemporaries, the superior of most. +What made him something much more than this—something infinitely more +important for us—was the vigor and loftiness of his imagination. +Without his imaginative power he would have been an artist of great +distinction, of whom any country might be proud; with it he became a +great creator, able to embody in enduring bronze the highest ideals and +the deepest feelings of a nation and of a time.</p> + +<p>It is a penetrating and sympathetic imagination that gave him his +unerring grasp of character, that enabled him to seize upon the +significant elements of a personality, to divine the attitude and the +gesture that should reveal it, to eliminate the unessential, to present +to us the man. This is the imagination of the portrait-painter, and +Saint-Gaudens has shown it again and again, in many of his reliefs and +memorial tablets, above all in his portrait statues. He showed it +conclusively in so early a work as the "Farragut" (Pl. 27), a work that +remains one of the modern masterpieces of portrait statuary. The man +stands there forever, feet apart, upon his swaying deck, his glass in +one strong hand, cool, courageous, ready, full of determination but +absolutely without bluster or braggadocio, a sailor, a gentleman, and a +hero. He showed it again, and with ampler maturity, in that august +figure of "Lincoln" (Pl. 28), grandly dignified, austerely simple, +sorrowfully human, risen from the chair of state that marks his office, +but about to speak as a man to men, his bent head and worn face +filled with a sense of power, but even more with the sadness of +responsibility—filled, above all, with a yearning, tender passion of +sympathy and love. In imaginative presentation of character, in nobility +of feeling and breadth of treatment, no less than in perfection of +workmanship, these are among the world's few worthy monuments to its +great men.</p> + +<p><a name="p27_t" id="p27_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 285px;"> + +<a href="images/p27.jpg"> +<img src="images/p27_t.jpg" width="285" height="360" alt="Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 27.—Saint-Gaudens. "Farragut."" title="Farragut" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 27.—Saint-Gaudens. "Farragut."</span> +</div> + +<p>And they are monuments to Americans by an American. Saint-Gaudens had +lived through the time of the Civil War, had felt, as a boy, the stir of +its great happenings in his blood, and its epic emotions had become a +part of his consciousness, deep-seated at the roots of his nature. The +feelings of the American people were his feelings, and his +representations of these and of other heroes of that great struggle are +among the most national as they are among the most vital things that our +country has produced in art.</p> + +<p>But if Saint-Gaudens's imagination was thus capable of raising the +portrait to the dignity of the type, it was no less capable of endowing +the imagined type with all the individuality of the portrait. In the +"Deacon Chapin" (Pl. 29), of Springfield, we have a purely ideal +production, the finest embodiment of New England Puritanism in our art, +for no portrait of the real Chapin existed. This swift-striding, +stern-looking old man, who clasps his Bible as Moses clasped the tables +of the law and grips his peaceful walking-stick as though it were a +sword, is a Puritan of the Puritans; but he is an individual also—a +rough-hewn piece of humanity with plenty of the old Adam about him—an +individual so clearly seen and so vigorously characterized that one can +hardly believe the statue an invention or realize that no such old +Puritan deacon ever existed in the flesh. Something of this imaginative +quality there is in almost everything Saint-Gaudens touched, even in +his purely decorative figures. His angels and caryatides are not +classical goddesses but modern women, lovely, but with a personal and +particular loveliness, not insisted upon but delicately suggested. And +it is not the personality of the model who chanced to pose for them but +an invented personality, the expression of the nobility, the sweetness, +and the pure-mindedness of their creator. And in such a figure as that +of the "Adams Memorial" (Pl. 30), in Rock Creek Cemetery in Washington, +his imaginative power reaches to a degree of impressiveness almost +unequalled in modern art. One knows of nothing since the tombs of the +Medici that fills one with the same hushed awe as this shrouded, hooded, +deeply brooding figure, rigid with contemplation, still with an eternal +stillness, her soul rapt from her body on some distant quest. Is she +Nirvana? Is she The Peace of God? She has been given many names—her +maker would give her none. Her meaning is mystery; she is the +everlasting enigma.</p> + +<p><a name="p28_t" id="p28_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 285px;"> + +<a href="images/p28.jpg"> +<img src="images/p28_t.jpg" width="285" height="360" alt="Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 28.—Saint-Gaudens. "Lincoln."" title="Lincoln" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 28.—Saint-Gaudens. "Lincoln."</span> +</div> + +<p>Not the greatest artist could twice sound so deep a note as this. The +figure remains unique in the work of the sculptor as it is unique in the +art of the century. Yet, perhaps, Saint-Gaudens's greatest works are two +in which all the varied elements of his genius find simultaneous +expression; into which his mastery of composition, his breadth and +solidity of structure, his technical skill, his insight into character, +and his power of imagination enter in nearly equal measure: the "Shaw +Memorial" and the great equestrian group of the "Sherman Monument."</p> + +<p>The "Shaw Memorial" (Pl. 31) is a relief, but a relief of many planes. +The marching troops are in three files, one behind the other, the +varying distances from the spectator marked by differences of the degree +of projection. Nearer than all of them is the equestrian figure of Shaw +himself, the horse and rider modelled nearly but not quite in the round. +The whole scale of relief was altered in the course of the work, after +it had once been nearly completed, and the mastery of the infinitely +complicated problem of relief in many degrees is supreme. But all the +more because the scheme was so full and so varied, the artist has +carefully avoided the pictorial in his treatment. There is no +perspective, the figures being all on the same scale, and there is no +background, no setting of houses or landscape. Everywhere, between and +above the figures, is the flat surface which is the immemorial tradition +of sculpture in relief; and the fact that it <i>is</i> a surface, +representing nothing, is made more clear by the inscription written upon +it—an inscription placed there, consciously or unconsciously, that it +might have that very effect. The composition is magnificent, whether for +its intrinsic beauty of arrangement—its balancing of lines and +spaces—or for its perfect expressiveness. The rhythmic step of marching +men is perfectly rendered, and the guns fill the middle of the panel in +an admirable pattern, without confusion or monotony. The heads are +superb in characterization, strikingly varied and individual, yet each a +strongly marked racial type, unmistakably African in all its forms.</p> + +<p><a name="p29_t" id="p29_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 225px;"> + +<a href="images/p29.jpg"> +<img src="images/p29_t.jpg" width="225" height="360" alt="Plate 29.—Saint-Gaudens. "Deacon Chapin."" title="Deacon Chapin" /> +</a><span class="caption">Plate 29.—Saint-Gaudens. "Deacon Chapin."</span> +</div> + +<p>These are merits, and merits of a very high order, enough of themselves +to place the work in the front rank of modern sculpture, but they are, +after all, its minor merits. What makes it the great thing it is is the +imaginative power displayed in it—the depth of emotion expressed, and +expressed with perfect simplicity and directness and an entire +absence of parade. The negro troops are marching steadily, soberly, +with high seriousness of purpose, and their white leader rides beside +them, drawn sword in hand, but with no military swagger, courageous, yet +with a hint of melancholy, ready not only to lay down his life but to +face, if need be, an ignominious death for the cause he believes to be +just. And above them, laden with poppy and with laurels, floats the +Death Angel pointing out the way.</p> + +<p><a name="p30_t" id="p30_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 266px;"> + +<a href="images/p30.jpg"> +<img src="images/p30_t.jpg" width="266" height="357" alt="Copyright, Curtis & Cameron. +Plate 30.—Saint-Gaudens. "Adams Memorial."" title="Adams Memorial" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, Curtis & Cameron. +Plate 30.—Saint-Gaudens. "Adams Memorial."</span> +</div> + + +<p>It is a work which artists may study again and again with growing +admiration and increasing profit, yet it is one that has found its way +straight to the popular heart. It is not always—it is not often—that +the artists and the public are thus at one. When they are it is safe to +assume that the work they equally admire is truly great—that it belongs +to the highest order of noble works of art.</p> + +<p>The Sherman group (Pl. 32), though it has been more criticised than the +"Shaw Memorial," seems to me, if possible, an even finer work. The main +objection to it has been that it is not sufficiently "monumental," and, +indeed, it has not the massiveness nor the repose of such a work as +Donatello's "Gattamelata," the greatest of all equestrian statues. It +could not well have these qualities in the same degree, its motive being +what it is, but they are, perhaps, not ill exchanged for the character +and the nationalism so marked in horse and rider and for the +irresistible onward rush of movement never more adequately expressed. In +all other respects the group seems to me almost beyond criticism. The +composition—composition, now, in the round and to be considered from +many points of view—builds up superbly; the flow of line in wing and +limb and drapery is perfect; the purely sculptural problems of +anatomical rendering, equine and human, are thoroughly resolved; the +modelling, as such, is almost as fine as the design.</p> + +<p><a name="p31_t" id="p31_t"></a></p> +<div class="figleft" style="width: 400px;"> + +<a href="images/p31.jpg"> +<img src="images/p31_t.jpg" width="400" height="299" alt="Copyright, De. W.C. Ward. +Plate 31.—Saint-Gaudens. "Shaw Memorial."" title="Shaw Memorial" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De. W.C. Ward. +Plate 31.—Saint-Gaudens. "Shaw Memorial."</span> +</div> + +<p>To the boyish Saint-Gaudens Sherman had seemed the typical American +hero. To the matured artist he had sat for an admirable bust. The +sculptor had thus an unusual knowledge of his subject, a perfect +sympathy with his theme; and he has produced a work of epic sweep and +significance. Tall and erect, the general sits his horse, his military +cloak bellying out behind him, his trousers strapped down over his +shoes, his hat in his right hand, dropping at arm's length behind his +knee, his bare head like that of an old eagle, looking straight forward. +The horse is as long and thin as his rider, with a tremendous stride; +and his big head, closely reined in, twitches viciously at the bridle. +Before the horse and rider, upon the ground, yet as if new-lighted there +from an aerial existence, half walks, half flies, a splendid winged +figure, one arm outstretched, the other brandishing the palm—Victory +leading them on. She has a certain fierce wildness of aspect, but her +rapt gaze and half-open mouth indicate the seer of visions—peace is +ahead, and an end of war. On the bosom of her gown is broidered the +eagle of the United States, for she is an American Victory, as this is +an American man on an American horse; and the broken pine bough beneath +the horse's feet localizes the victorious march—it is the march through +Georgia to the sea.</p> + +<p>Long ago I expressed my conviction that the "Sherman Monument" is third +in rank of the great equestrian statues of the world. To-day I am not +sure that that conviction remains unaltered. Donatello's "Gattamelata" +is unapproached and unapproachable in its quiet dignity; Verrocchio's +"Colleone" is unsurpassed in picturesque attractiveness. Both are +consecrated by the admiration of centuries. To-day I am not sure that +this work of an American sculptor is not, in its own way, equal to +either of them.</p> + +<p>There are those who are troubled by the introduction of the symbolical +figures in such works as the "Shaw Memorial" and the Sherman statue; +and, indeed, it was a bold enterprise to place them where they are, +mingling thus in the same work the real and the ideal, the actual and +the allegorical. But the boldness seems to me abundantly justified by +success. In either case the entire work is pitched to the key of these +figures; the treatment of the whole is so elevated by style and so +infused with imagination that there is no shock of unlikeness or +difficulty of transition. And these figures are not merely necessary to +the composition, an essential part of its beauty—they are even more +essential to the expression of the artist's thought. Without that +hovering Angel of Death, the negro troops upon the "Shaw Memorial" might +be going anywhere, to battle or to review. We should have a passing +regiment, nothing more. Without the striding Victory before him, the +impetuous movement of Sherman's horse would have no especial +significance. And these figures are no mere conventional allegories; +they are true creations. To their creator the unseen was as real as the +seen—nay, it was more so. That Shaw was riding to his death at the +command of duty was, the only thing that made Shaw memorable. That +Sherman was marching to a victory the fruits of which should be peace +was the essential thing about Sherman. Death and Duty—Victory and +Peace—in each case the compound ideal found its expression in a figure +entirely original and astonishingly living: a <i>person</i> as truly as Shaw +or Sherman themselves. He could not have left them out. It were +better to give up the work entirely than to do it otherwise than as he +saw it.</p> + +<p><a name="p32_t" id="p32_t"></a></p> +<div class="figright" style="width: 350px;"> + +<a href="images/p32.jpg"> +<img src="images/p32_t.jpg" width="350" height="327" alt="Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 32.—Saint-Gaudens. "Sherman."" title="Sherman" /> +</a><span class="caption">Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 32.—Saint-Gaudens. "Sherman."</span> +</div> + +<p>I have described and discussed but a few of the many works of this great +artist, choosing those which seem to me the most significant and the +most important, and in doing so I have keenly felt the inadequacy of +words to express the qualities of an art which exists by forms. +Fortunately, the works themselves are, for the most part, readily +accessible. In the originals, in casts, or in photographs, they may be +studied by every one. Nothing is more difficult than to estimate justly +the greatness of an object that is too near to us—it is only as it +recedes into the distance that the mountain visibly overtops its +neighboring hills. It is difficult to understand that this man so lately +familiar to us, moving among us as one of ourselves, is of the company +of the immortals. Yet I believe, as we make this study of his works, as +we yield ourselves to the graciousness of his charm or are exalted by +the sweep of his imagination, we shall come to feel an assured +conviction that Augustus Saint-Gaudens was not merely the most +accomplished artist of America, not merely one of the foremost sculptors +of his time—we shall feel that he is one of those great, creative +minds, transcending time and place, not of America or of to-day, but of +the world and forever.</p> + +<p>Where, among such minds, he will take his rank we need not ask. It is +enough that he is among them. Such an artist is assuredly a benefactor +of his country, and it is eminently fitting that his gift to us should +be acknowledged by such tribute as we can pay him. By his works in other +lands and by his world-wide fame he sheds a glory upon the name of +America, helping to convince the world that here also are those who +occupy themselves with the things of the spirit, that here also are +other capabilities than those of industrial energy and material success. +In his many minor works he has endowed us with an inexhaustible heritage +of beauty—beauty which is "about the best thing God invents." He is the +educator of our taste and of more than our taste—of our sentiment and +our emotions. In his great monuments he has not only given us fitting +presentments of our national heroes; he has expressed, and in expressing +elevated, our loftiest ideals; he has expressed, and in expressing +deepened, our profoundest feelings. He has become the voice of all that +is best in the American people, and his works are incentives to +patriotism and lessons in devotion to duty.</p> + +<p>But the great and true artist is more than a benefactor of his country, +he is a benefactor of the human race. The body of Saint-Gaudens is +ashes, but his mind, his spirit, his character have taken on enduring +forms and are become a part of the inheritance of mankind. And if, in +the lapse of ages, his very name should be forgotten—as are the names +of many great artists who have gone before him—yet his work will +remain; and while any fragment of it is decipherable the world will be +the richer in that he lived.</p> + +<div><br /></div> +<div><br /></div> +<div><br /></div> +<hr style="width: 25%;" /> + +<p class="center"><i>[Transcriber's Note: In the Table of Illustrations and in the caption for +plate 17, Bolensa was corrected to Bolsena.]</i></p> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Artist and Public, by Kenyon Cox + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTIST AND PUBLIC *** + +***** This file should be named 16655-h.htm or 16655-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/6/6/5/16655/ + +Produced by Ted Garvin, Melissa Er-Raqabi and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/16655-h/images/p01.jpg b/16655-h/images/p01.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..77ad8fa --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p01.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p01_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p01_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..772ff30 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p01_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p02.jpg b/16655-h/images/p02.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..59e7e40 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p02.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p02_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p02_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6677fbd --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p02_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p03.jpg b/16655-h/images/p03.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..585e7eb --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p03.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p03_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p03_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..98a9355 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p03_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p04.jpg b/16655-h/images/p04.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..67ca9c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p04.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p04_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p04_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..23c2cb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p04_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p05.jpg b/16655-h/images/p05.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..41b5ff5 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p05.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p05_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p05_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2da6406 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p05_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p06.jpg b/16655-h/images/p06.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..cb5828d --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p06.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p06_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p06_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..71ca175 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p06_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p07.jpg b/16655-h/images/p07.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b87c4b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p07.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p07_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p07_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..411bcf7 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p07_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p08.jpg b/16655-h/images/p08.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2283f03 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p08.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p08_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p08_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d45272c --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p08_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p09.jpg b/16655-h/images/p09.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2a6680e --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p09.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p09_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p09_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5b27ce6 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p09_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p10.jpg b/16655-h/images/p10.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..12d93c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p10.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p10_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p10_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f481c83 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p10_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p11.jpg b/16655-h/images/p11.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..42846a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p11.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p11_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p11_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9f1fd61 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p11_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p12.jpg b/16655-h/images/p12.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e7c727a --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p12.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p12_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p12_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4204026 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p12_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p13.jpg b/16655-h/images/p13.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4c5243b --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p13.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p13_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p13_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5b3b139 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p13_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p14.jpg b/16655-h/images/p14.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1fed1ac --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p14.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p14_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p14_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4350365 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p14_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p15.jpg b/16655-h/images/p15.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..366b489 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p15.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p15_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p15_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f8274df --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p15_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p16.jpg b/16655-h/images/p16.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9426669 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p16.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p16_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p16_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..65f761b --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p16_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p17.jpg b/16655-h/images/p17.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a974591 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p17.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p17_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p17_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..717c786 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p17_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p18.jpg b/16655-h/images/p18.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..cb70d3e --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p18.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p18_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p18_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..40e5c58 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p18_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p19.jpg b/16655-h/images/p19.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8940b22 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p19.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p19t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p19t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5646840 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p19t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p20.jpg b/16655-h/images/p20.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f90c8b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p20.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p20_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p20_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2201468 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p20_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p21.jpg b/16655-h/images/p21.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a738975 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p21.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p21_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p21_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..08528bd --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p21_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p22.jpg b/16655-h/images/p22.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6727f8a --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p22.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p22_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p22_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..157531b --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p22_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p23.jpg b/16655-h/images/p23.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e0c53a --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p23.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p23_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p23_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1161118 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p23_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p24.jpg b/16655-h/images/p24.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3b6aae1 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p24.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p24_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p24_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4e173a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p24_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p25.jpg b/16655-h/images/p25.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8bed4af --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p25.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p25_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p25_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3009a62 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p25_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p26.jpg b/16655-h/images/p26.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6faf703 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p26.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p26_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p26_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..19788bf --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p26_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p27.jpg b/16655-h/images/p27.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b7b8c2d --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p27.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p27_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p27_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..240f7eb --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p27_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p28.jpg b/16655-h/images/p28.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0356fd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p28.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p28_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p28_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4aae182 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p28_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p29.jpg b/16655-h/images/p29.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d034b34 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p29.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p29_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p29_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bbbcb7c --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p29_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p30.jpg b/16655-h/images/p30.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a304f12 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p30.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p30_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p30_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..65daeeb --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p30_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p31.jpg b/16655-h/images/p31.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ee34063 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p31.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p31_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p31_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a2b2447 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p31_t.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p32.jpg b/16655-h/images/p32.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0acea81 --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p32.jpg diff --git a/16655-h/images/p32_t.jpg b/16655-h/images/p32_t.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f2048cf --- /dev/null +++ b/16655-h/images/p32_t.jpg diff --git a/16655.txt b/16655.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..12df02d --- /dev/null +++ b/16655.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3820 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artist and Public, by Kenyon Cox + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Artist and Public + And Other Essays On Art Subjects + +Author: Kenyon Cox + +Release Date: September 5, 2005 [EBook #16655] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTIST AND PUBLIC *** + + + + +Produced by Ted Garvin, Melissa Er-Raqabi and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + + + + + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + +AND OTHER +ESSAYS ON ART SUBJECTS + + +BY +KENYON COX + + + +[Illustration: From a photograph by Braun, Clement & Co. +Plate 1.--Millet. "The Goose Girl." +In the collection of Mme. Saulnier, Bordeaux.] + + + + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + +AND OTHER +ESSAYS ON ART SUBJECTS + + +BY +KENYON COX + + +_WITH THIRTY-TWO ILLUSTRATIONS_ + + + +CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS +NEW YORK MCMXIV + + + + +_Copyright, 1914, by Charles Scribner's Sons +Published September, 1914_ + + + + +TO + +J.D.C. + +IN GRATEFUL RECOGNITION OF UNFAILING KINDNESS +THIS BOOK IS INSCRIBED + + + + +PREFACE + + +In "The Classic Point of View," published three years ago, I endeavored +to give a clear and definitive statement of the principles on which all +my criticism of art is based. The papers here gathered together, whether +earlier or later than that volume, may be considered as the more +detailed application of those principles to particular artists, to whole +schools and epochs, even, in one case, to the entire history of the +arts. The essay on Raphael, for instance, is little else than an +illustration of the chapter on "Design"; that on Millet illustrates the +three chapters on "The Subject in Art," on "Design," and on "Drawing"; +while "Two Ways of Painting" contrasts, in specific instances, the +classic with the modern point of view. + +But there is another thread connecting these essays, for all of them +will be found to have some bearing, more or less direct, upon the +subject of the title essay. "The Illusion of Progress" elaborates a +point more slightly touched upon in "Artist and Public"; the careers of +Raphael and Millet are capital instances of the happy productiveness of +an artist in sympathy with his public or of the difficulties, nobly +conquered in this case, of an artist without public appreciation; the +greatest merit attributed to "The American School" is an abstention +from the extravagances of those who would make incomprehensibility a +test of greatness. Finally, the work of Saint-Gaudens is a noble example +of art fulfilling its social function in expressing and in elevating the +ideals of its time and country. + +This last essay stands, in some respects, upon a different footing from +the others. It deals with the work and the character of a man I knew and +loved, it was originally written almost immediately after his death, and +it is therefore colored, to some extent, by personal emotion. I have +revised it, rearranged it, and added to it, and I trust that this +coloring may be found to warm, without falsifying, the picture. + +The essay on "The Illusion of Progress" was first printed in "The +Century," that on Saint-Gaudens in "The Atlantic Monthly." The others +originally appeared in "Scribner's Magazine." + +KENYON COX. + +Calder House, +Croton-on-Hudson, +June 6, 1914. + + + + +CONTENTS + + +ESSAY PAGE + + I. ARTIST AND PUBLIC 1 + II. JEAN FRANCOIS MILLET 44 +III. THE ILLUSION OF PROGRESS 77 + IV. RAPHAEL 99 + V. TWO WAYS OF PAINTING 134 + VI. THE AMERICAN SCHOOL 149 +VII. AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS 169 + + + + +ILLUSTRATIONS + + +MILLET: + 1. "The Goose Girl," _Saulnier Collection, Bordeaux_ _Frontispiece_ + FACING PAGE + 2. "The Sower," _Vanderbilt Collection, Metropolitan Museum, New York_ 46 + 3. "The Gleaners," _The Louvre_ 50 + 4. "The Spaders" 54 + 5. "The Potato Planter," _Shaw Collection_ 58 + 6. "The Grafter," _William Rockefeller Collection_ 62 + 7. "The New-Born Calf," _Art Institute, Chicago_ 66 + 8. "The First Steps," 70 + 9. "The Shepherdess," _Chauchard Collection, Louvre_ 72 +10. "Spring," _The Louvre_ 74 + +RAPHAEL: +11. "Poetry," _The Vatican_ 112 +12. "The Judgment of Solomon," _The Vatican_ 114 +13. The "Disputa," _The Vatican_ 116 +14. "The School of Athens," _The Vatican_ 118 +15. "Parnassus," _The Vatican_ 120 +16. "Jurisprudence," _The Vatican_ 122 +17. "The Mass of Bolsena," _The Vatican_ 124 +18. "The Deliverance of Peter," _The Vatican_ 126 +19. "The Sibyls," _Santa Maria della Pace, Rome_ 128 +20. "Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami," _Gardner Collection_ 130 + +JOHN S. SARGENT: +21. "The Hermit," _Metropolitan Museum, New York_ 136 + +TITIAN: +22. "Saint Jerome in the Desert," _Brera Gallery, Milan_ 142 + +SAINT-GAUDENS: +23. "Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque" 182 +24. "Amor Caritas" 196 +25. "The Butler Children" 206 +26. "Sarah Redwood Lee" 208 +27. "Farragut," _Madison Square, New York_ 212 +28. "Lincoln," _Chicago, Ill._ 214 +29. "Deacon Chapin," _Springfield, Mass._ 216 +30. "Adams Memorial," _Washington, D.C._ 218 +31. "Shaw Memorial," _Boston, Mass._ 220 +32. "Sherman," _The Plaza, Central Park, New York_ 224 + + + + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + + + + +I + +ARTIST AND PUBLIC + + +In the history of art, as in the history of politics and in the history +of economics, our modern epoch is marked off from all preceding epochs +by one great event, the French Revolution. Fragonard, who survived that +Revolution to lose himself in a new and strange world, is the last at +the old masters; David, some sixteen years his junior, is the first of +the moderns. Now if we look for the most fundamental distinction between +our modern art and the art of past times, I believe we shall find it to +be this: the art of the past was produced for a public that wanted it +and understood it, by artists who understood and sympathized with their +public; the art of our time has been, for the most part, produced for a +public that did not want it and misunderstood it, by artists who +disliked and despised the public for which they worked. When artist and +public were united, art was homogeneous and continuous. Since the +divorce of artist and public art has been chaotic and convulsive. + +That this divorce between the artist and his public--this dislocation of +the right and natural relations between them--has taken place is +certain. The causes of it are many and deep-lying in our modern +civilization, and I can point out only a few of the more obvious ones. + +The first of these is the emergence of a new public. The art of past +ages had been distinctively an aristocratic art, created for kings and +princes, for the free citizens of slave-holding republics, for the +spiritual and intellectual aristocracy of the church, or for a luxurious +and frivolous nobility. As the aim of the Revolution was the +destruction of aristocratic privilege, it is not surprising that a +revolutionary like David should have felt it necessary to destroy the +traditions of an art created for the aristocracy. In his own art of +painting he succeeded so thoroughly that the painters of the next +generation found themselves with no traditions at all. They had not only +to work for a public of enriched bourgeois or proletarians who had never +cared for art, but they had to create over again the art with which they +endeavored to interest this public. How could they succeed? The rift +between artist and public had begun, and it has been widening ever +since. + +If the people had had little to do with the major arts of painting and +sculpture, there had yet been, all through the Middle Ages and the +Renaissance, a truly popular art--an art of furniture making, of +wood-carving, of forging, of pottery. Every craftsman was an artist in +his degree, and every artist was but a craftsman of a superior sort. Our +machine-making, industrial civilization, intent upon material progress +and the satisfaction of material wants, has destroyed this popular art; +and at the same time that the artist lost his patronage from above he +lost his support from below. He has become a superior person, a sort of +demi-gentleman, but he has no longer a splendid nobility to employ him +or a world of artist artisans to surround him and understand him. + +And to the modern artist, so isolated, with no tradition behind him, no +direction from above and no support from below, the art of all times and +all countries has become familiar through modern means of communication +and modern processes of reproduction. Having no compelling reason for +doing one thing rather than another, or for choosing one or another way +of doing things, he is shown a thousand things that he may do and a +thousand ways of doing them. Not clearly knowing his own mind he hears +the clash and reverberation of a thousand other minds, and having no +certainties he must listen to countless theories. + +Mr. Vedder has spoken of a certain "home-made" character which he +considers the greatest defect of his art, the character of an art +belonging to no distinctive school and having no definite relation to +the time and country in which it is produced. But it is not Mr. Vedder's +art alone that is home-made. It is precisely the characteristic note of +our modern art that all of it that is good for anything is home-made or +self-made. Each artist has had to create his art as best he could out of +his own temperament and his own experience--has sat in his corner like a +spider, spinning his web from his own bowels. If the art so created was +essentially fine and noble the public has at last found it out, but only +after years of neglect have embittered the existence and partially +crippled the powers of its creator. And so, to our modern imagination, +the neglected and misunderstood genius has become the very type of the +great artist, and we have allowed our belief in him to color and distort +our vision of the history of art. We have come to look upon the great +artists of all times as an unhappy race struggling against the +inappreciation of a stupid public, starving in garrets and waiting long +for tardy recognition. + +The very reverse of this is true. With the exception of Rembrandt, who +himself lived in a time of political revolution and of the emergence to +power of a burgher class, you will scarce find an unappreciated genius +in the whole history of art until the beginning of the nineteenth +century. The great masters of the Renaissance, from Giotto to Veronese, +were men of their time, sharing and interpreting the ideals of those +around them, and were recognized and patronized as such. Rembrandt's +greatest contemporary, Rubens, was painter in ordinary to half the +courts of Europe, and Velazquez was the friend and companion of his +king. Watteau and Boucher and Fragonard painted for the frivolous +nobility of the eighteenth century just what that nobility wanted, and +even the precursors of the Revolution, sober and honest Chardin, Greuze +the sentimental, had no difficulty in making themselves understood, +until the revolutionist David became dictator to the art of Europe and +swept them into the rubbish heap with the rest. + +It is not until the beginning of what is known as the Romantic movement, +under the Restoration, that the misunderstood painter of genius +definitely appears. Millet, Corot, Rousseau were trying, with +magnificent powers and perfect single-mindedness, to restore the art of +painting which the Revolution had destroyed. They were men of the utmost +nobility and simplicity of character, as far as possible from the +gloomy, fantastic, vain, and egotistical person that we have come to +accept as the type of unappreciated genius; they were classically minded +and conservative, worshippers of the great art of the past; but they +were without a public and they suffered bitter discouragement and long +neglect. Upon their experience is founded that legend of the +unpopularity of all great artists which has grown to astonishing +proportions. Accepting this legend, and believing that all great artists +are misunderstood, the artist has come to cherish a scorn of the public +for which he works and to pretend a greater scorn than he feels. He +cannot believe himself great _unless_ he is misunderstood, and he hugs +his unpopularity to himself as a sign of genius and arrives at that +sublime affectation which answers praise of his work with an exclamation +of dismay: "Is it as bad as that?" He invents new excesses and +eccentricities to insure misunderstanding, and proclaims the doctrine +that, as anything great must be incomprehensible, so anything +incomprehensible must be great. And the public has taken him, at least +partly, at his word. He may or may not be great, but he is certainly +incomprehensible and probably a little mad. Until he succeeds the public +looks upon the artist as a more or less harmless lunatic. When he +succeeds it is willing to exalt him into a kind of god and to worship +his eccentricities as a part of his divinity. So we arrive at a belief +in the insanity of genius. What would Raphael have thought of such a +notion, or that consummate man of the world, Titian? What would the +serene and mighty Veronese have thought of it, or the cool, clear-seeing +Velazquez? How his Excellency the Ambassador of his Most Catholic +Majesty, glorious Peter Paul Rubens, would have laughed! + +It is this lack of sympathy and understanding between the artist and his +public--this fatal isolation of the artist--that is the cause of nearly +all the shortcomings of modern art; of the weakness of what is known as +official or academic art no less than of the extravagance of the art of +opposition. The artist, being no longer a craftsman, working to order, +but a kind of poet, expressing in loneliness his personal emotions, has +lost his natural means of support. Governments, feeling a responsibility +for the cultivation of art which was quite unnecessary in the days when +art was spontaneously produced in answer to a natural demand, have +tried to put an artificial support in its place. That the artist may +show his wares and make himself known, they have created exhibitions; +that he may be encouraged they have instituted medals and prizes; that +he may not starve they have made government purchases. And these +well-meant efforts have resulted in the creation of pictures which have +no other purpose than to hang in exhibitions, to win medals, and to be +purchased by the government and hung in those more permanent exhibitions +which we call museums. For this purpose it is not necessary that a +picture should have great beauty or great sincerity. It _is_ necessary +that it should be large in order to attract attention and sufficiently +well drawn and executed to seem to deserve recognition. And so was +evolved the salon picture, a thing created for no man's pleasure, not +even the artist's; a thing which is neither the decoration of a public +building nor the possible ornament of a private house; a thing which, +after it has served its temporary purpose, is rolled up and stored in a +loft or placed in a gallery where its essential emptiness becomes more +and more evident as time goes on. Such government-encouraged art had at +least the merit of a well-sustained and fairly high level of +accomplishment in the more obvious elements of painting. But as +exhibitions became larger and larger and the competition engendered by +them grew fiercer, it became increasingly difficult to attract attention +by mere academic merit. So the painters began to search for +sensationalism of subject, and the typical salon picture, no longer +decorously pompous, began to deal in blood and horror and sensuality. It +was Regnault who began this sensation hunt, but it has been carried much +further since his day than he can have dreamed of, and the modern salon +picture is not only tiresome but detestable. + +The salon picture, in its merits and its faults, is peculiarly French, +but the modern exhibition has sins to answer for in other countries than +France. In England it has been responsible for a great deal of +sentimentality and anecdotage which has served to attract the attention +of a public that could not be roused to interest in mere painting. +Everywhere, even in this country, where exhibitions are relatively small +and ill-attended, it has caused a certain stridency and blatancy, a +keying up to exhibition pitch, a neglect of finer qualities for the sake +of immediate effectiveness. + +Under our modern conditions the exhibition has become a necessity, and +it would be impossible for our artists to live or to attain a reputation +without it. The giving of medals and prizes and the purchase of works +of art by the state may be of more doubtful utility, though such efforts +at the encouragement of art probably do more good than harm. But there +is one form of government patronage that is almost wholly beneficial, +and that the only form of it which we have in this country--the awarding +of commissions for the decoration of public buildings. The painter of +mural decorations is in the old historical position, in sound and +natural relations to the public. He is doing something which is wanted +and, if he continues to receive commissions, he may fairly assume that +he is doing it in a way that is satisfactory. With the decorative or +monumental sculptor he is almost alone among modern artists in being +relieved of the necessity of producing something in the isolation of his +studio and waiting to see if any one will care for it; of trying, +against the grain, to produce something that he thinks may appeal to +the public because it does not appeal to himself; or of attempting to +bamboozle the public into buying what neither he nor the public really +cares for. If he does his best he may feel that he is as fairly earning +his livelihood as his fellow workmen, the blacksmith and the +stonecutter, and is as little dependent as they upon either charity or +humbug. The best that government has done for art in France is the +commissioning of the great decorative paintings of Baudry and Puvis. In +this country, also, governments, national, State, or municipal, are +patronizing art in the best possible way, and in making buildings +splendid for the people are affording opportunity for the creation of a +truly popular art. + +Without any artificial aid from the government the illustrator has a +wide popular support and works for the public in a normal way; and, +therefore, illustration has been one of the healthiest and most +vigorous forms of modern art. The portrait-painter, too, is producing +something he knows to be wanted, and, though his art has had to fight +against the competition of the photograph and has been partially +vulgarized by the struggle of the exhibitions, it has yet remained, upon +the whole, comprehensible and human; so that much of the soundest art of +the past century has gone into portraiture. It is the painters of +pictures, landscape or genre, who have most suffered from the +misunderstanding between artist and public. Without guidance some of +them have hewed a path to deserved success. Others have wandered into +strange byways and no-thoroughfares. + +The nineteenth century is strewn with the wrecks of such misunderstood +and misunderstanding artists, but it was about the sixties when their +searching for a way began to lead them in certain clearly marked +directions. There are three paths, in especial, which have been followed +since then by adventurous spirits: the paths of aestheticism, of +scientific naturalism, and of pure self-expression; the paths of +Whistler, of Monet, and of Cezanne. + +Whistler was an artist of refined and delicate talent with great +weaknesses both in temperament and training; being also a very clever +man and a brilliant controversialist, he proceeded to erect a theory +which should prove his weaknesses to be so many virtues, and he nearly +succeeded in convincing the world of its validity. Finding the +representation of nature very difficult, he decided that art should not +concern itself with representation but only with the creation of +"arrangements" and "symphonies." Having no interest in the subject of +pictures, he proclaimed that pictures should have no subjects and that +any interest in the subject is vulgar. As he was a cosmopolitan with no +local ties, he maintained that art had never been national; and as he +was out of sympathy with his time, he taught that "art happens" and that +"there never was an artistic period." According to the Whistlerian +gospel, the artist not only has now no point of contact with the public, +but he should not have and never has had any. He has never been a man +among other men, but has been a dreamer "who sat at home with the women" +and made pretty patterns of line and color because they pleased him. And +the only business of the public is to accept "in silence" what he +chooses to give them. + +This kind of rootless art he practised. Some of the patterns he produced +are delightful, but they are without imagination, without passion, +without joy in the material and visible world--the dainty diversions of +a dilettante. One is glad that so gracefully slender an art should +exist, but if it has seemed great art to us it is because our age is so +poor in anything better. To rank its creator with the abounding masters +of the past is an absurdity. + +In their efforts to escape from the dead-alive art of the salon picture, +Monet and the Impressionists took an entirely different course. The +gallery painter's perfunctory treatment of subject bored them, and they +abandoned subject almost as entirely as Whistler had done. The sound if +tame drawing and the mediocre painting of what they called official art +revolted them as it revolted Whistler; but while he nearly suppressed +representation they could see in art nothing but representation. They +wanted to make that representation truer, and they tried to work a +revolution in art by the scientific analysis of light and the +invention of a new method of laying on paint. Instead of joining in +Whistler's search for pure pattern they fixed their attention on facts +alone, or rather on one aspect of the facts, and in their occupation +with light and the manner of representing it they abandoned form almost +as completely as they had abandoned significance and beauty. + +So it happened that Monet could devote some twenty canvases to the study +of the effects of light, at different hours of the day, upon two straw +stacks in his farmyard. It was admirable practice, no doubt, and neither +scientific analysis nor the study of technical methods is to be +despised; but the interest of the public, after all, is in what an +artist does, not in how he learns to do it. The twenty canvases together +formed a sort of demonstration of the possibilities of different kinds +of lighting. Any one of them, taken singly, is but a portrait of two +straw stacks, and the world will not permanently or deeply care about +those straw stacks. The study of light is, in itself, no more an +exercise of the artistic faculties than the study of anatomy or the +study of perspective; and while Impressionism has put a keener edge upon +some of the tools of the artist, it has inevitably failed to produce a +school of art. + +After Impressionism, what? We have no name for it but +Post-Impressionism. Such men as Cezanne, Gauguin, Van Gogh recognized +the sterility of Impressionism and of a narrow aestheticism, while they +shared the hatred of the aesthetes and the Impressionists for the current +art of the salons. No more than the aesthetes or the Impressionists were +they conscious of any social or universal ideals that demanded +expression. The aesthetes had a doctrine; the Impressionists had a method +and a technic. The Post-Impressionists had nothing, and were driven to +the attempt at pure self-expression--to the exaltation of the great god +Whim. They had no training, they recognized no traditions, they spoke to +no public. Each was to express, as he thought best, whatever he happened +to feel or to think, and to invent, as he went along, the language in +which he should express it. I think some of these men had the elements +of genius in them and might have done good work; but their task was a +heart-breaking and a hopeless one. An art cannot be improvised, and an +artist must have some other guide than unregulated emotion. The path +they entered upon had been immemorially marked "no passing"; for many of +them the end of it was suicide or the madhouse. + +But whatever the aberrations of these, the true +Post-Impressionists--whatever the ugliness, the eccentricity, or the +moral dinginess into which they were betrayed--I believe them to have +been, in the main, honest if unbalanced and ill-regulated minds. +Whatever their errors, they paid the price of them in poverty, in +neglect, in death. With those who pretend to be their descendants to-day +the case is different; they are not paying for their eccentricity or +their madness, they are making it pay. + +The enormous engine of modern publicity has been discovered by these +men. They have learned to advertise, and they have found that morbidity, +eccentricity, indecency, extremes of every kind and of any degree are +capital advertisement. If one cannot create a sound and living art, one +can at least make something odd enough to be talked about; if one cannot +achieve enduring fame, one may make sure of a flaming notoriety. And, as +a money-maker, present notoriety is worth more than future fame, for the +speculative dealer is at hand. His interest is in "quick returns" and +he has no wish to wait until you are famous--or dead--before he can sell +anything you do. His process is to buy anything he thinks he can "boom," +to "boom" it as furiously as possible, and to sell it before the "boom" +collapses. Then he will exploit something else, and there's the rub. +Once you have entered this mad race for notoriety, there is no drawing +out of it. The same sensation will not attract attention a second time; +you must be novel at any cost. You must exaggerate your exaggerations +and out-Herod Herod, for others have learned how easy the game is to +play, and are at your heels. It is no longer a matter of +misunderstanding and being misunderstood by the public; it is a matter +of deliberately flouting and outraging the public--of assuming +incomprehensibility and antagonism to popular feeling as signs of +greatness. And so is founded what Frederic Harrison has called the +"shock-your-grandmother school." + +It is with profound regret that one must name as one of the founders of +this school an artist of real power, who has produced much admirable +work--Auguste Rodin. At the age of thirty-seven he attained a sudden and +resounding notoriety, and from that time he has been the most talked-of +artist in Europe. He was a consummate modeller, a magnificent workman, +but he had always grave faults and striking mannerisms. These faults and +mannerisms he has latterly pushed to greater and greater extremes while +neglecting his great gift, each work being more chaotic and fragmentary +in composition, more hideous in type, more affected and emptier in +execution, until he has produced marvels of mushiness and incoherence +hitherto undreamed of and has set up as public monuments fantastically +mutilated figures with broken legs or heads knocked off. Now, in his +old age, he is producing shoals of drawings the most extraordinary of +which few are permitted to see. Some selected specimens of them hang in +a long row in the Metropolitan Museum, and I assure you, upon my word as +a lifelong student of drawing, they are quite as ugly and as silly as +they look. There is not a touch in them that has any truth to nature, +not a line that has real beauty or expressiveness. They represent the +human figure with the structure of a jellyfish and the movement of a +Dutch doll; the human face with an expression I prefer not to +characterize. If they be not the symptoms of mental decay, they can be +nothing but the means of a gigantic mystification. + +With Henri Matisse we have not to deplore the deliquescence of a great +talent, for we have no reason to suppose he ever had any. It is true +that his admirers will assure you he could once draw and paint as +everybody does; what he could _not_ do was to paint enough better than +everybody does to make his mark in the world; and he was a quite +undistinguished person until he found a way to produce some effect upon +his grandmother the public by shocking her into attention. His method is +to choose the ugliest models to be found; to put them into the most +grotesque and indecent postures imaginable; to draw them in the manner +of a savage, or a depraved child, or a worse manner if that be possible; +to surround his figures with blue outlines half an inch wide; and to +paint them in crude and staring colors, brutally laid on in flat masses. +Then, when his grandmother begins to "sit up," she is told with a grave +face that this is a reaction from naturalism, a revival of abstract line +and color, a subjective art which is not the representation of nature +but the expression of the artist's soul. No wonder she gasps and +stares! + +It seemed, two or three years ago, that the limit of mystification had +been reached--that this comedy of errors could not be carried further; +but human ingenuity is inexhaustible, and we now have whole schools, +Cubists, Futurists, and the like, who joyously vie with each other in +the creation of incredible pictures and of irreconcilable and +incomprehensible theories. The public is inclined to lump them all +together and, so far as their work is concerned, the public is not far +wrong; yet in theory Cubism and Futurism are diametrically opposed to +each other. It is not easy to get any clear conception of the doctrines +of these schools, but, so far as I am able to understand them--and I +have taken some pains to do so--they are something like this: + +Cubism is static; Futurism is kinetic. Cubism deals with bulk; Futurism +deals with motion. The Cubist, by a kind of extension of Mr. Berenson's +doctrine of "tactile values," assumes that the only character of objects +which is of importance to the artist is their bulk and solidity--what he +calls their "volumes." Now the form in which volume is most easily +apprehended is the cube; do we not measure by it and speak of the cubic +contents of anything? The inference is easy: reduce all objects to forms +which can be bounded by planes and defined by straight lines and angles; +make their cubic contents measurable to the eye; transform drawing into +a burlesque of solid geometry; and you have, at once, attained to the +highest art. The Futurist, on the other hand, maintains that we know +nothing but that things are in flux. Form, solidity, weight are +illusions. Nothing exists but motion. Everything is changing every +moment, and if anything were still we ourselves are changing. It is, +therefore, absurd to give fixed boundaries to anything or to admit of +any fixed relations in space. If you are trying to record your +impression of a face it is certain that by the time you have done one +eye the other eye will no longer be where it was--it may be at the other +side of the room. You must cut nature into small bits and shuffle them +about wildly if you are to reproduce what we really see. + +Whatever its extravagance, Cubism remains a form of graphic art. However +pedantic and ridiculous its transformation of drawing, it yet recognizes +the existence of drawing. Therefore, to the Futurist, Cubism is +reactionary. What difference does it make, he asks, whether you draw a +head round or square? Why draw a head at all? The Futurist denies the +fundamental postulates of the art of painting. Painting has always, and +by definition, represented upon a surface objects supposed to lie +beyond it and to be seen through it. Futurism pretends to place the +spectator inside the picture and to represent things around him or +behind him as well as those in front of him. Painting has always assumed +the single moment of vision, and, though it has sometimes placed more +than one picture on the same canvas, it has treated each picture as seen +at a specific instant of time. Futurism attempts systematically to +combine the past and the future with the present, as if all the pictures +in a cinematograph film were to be printed one over the other; to paint +no instant but to represent the movement of time. It aims at nothing +less than the abrogation of all recognized laws, the total destruction +of all that has hitherto passed for art. + +Do you recall the story of the man who tried to count a litter of pigs, +but gave it up because one little pig ran about so fast that he could +not be counted? One finds oneself in somewhat the same predicament when +one tries to describe these "new movements" in art. The movement is so +rapid and the men shift their ground so quickly that there is no telling +where to find them. You have no sooner arrived at some notion of the +difference between Cubism and Futurism than you find your Cubist doing +things that are both Cubist and Futurist, or neither Cubist nor +Futurist, according as you look at them. You find things made up of +geometrical figures to give volume, yet with all the parts many times +repeated to give motion. You find things that have neither bulk nor +motion but look like nothing so much as a box of Chinese tangrams +scattered on a table. Finally, you have assemblages of lines that do not +draw anything, even cubes or triangles; and we are assured that there +is now a newest school of all, called Orphism, which, finding still some +vestiges of intelligibility in any assemblage of lines, reduces +everything to shapeless blotches. Probably the first of Orphic pictures +was that produced by the quite authentic donkey who was induced to smear +a canvas by lashing a tail duly dipped in paint. It was given a title as +Orphic as the painting, was accepted by a jury anxious to find new forms +of talent, and was hung in the _Salon d'Automne._ + +In all this welter of preposterous theories there is but one thing +constant--one thing on which all these theorists are agreed. It is that +all this strange stuff is symbolic and shadows forth the impressions and +emotions of the artist: represents not nature but his feeling about +nature; is the expression of his mind or, as they prefer to call it, his +soul. It may be so. All art is symbolic; images are symbols; words are +symbols; all communication is by symbols. But if a symbol is to serve +any purpose of communication between one mind and another it must be a +symbol accepted and understood by both minds. If an artist is to choose +his symbols to suit himself, and to make them mean anything he chooses, +who is to say what he means or whether he means anything? If a man were +to rise and recite, with a solemn voice, words like "Ajakan maradak +tecor sosthendi," would you know what he meant? If he wished you to +believe that these symbols express the feeling of awe caused by the +contemplation of the starry heavens, he would have to tell you so _in +your own language_; and even then you would have only his word for it. +He may have meant them to express that, but do they? The apologists of +the new schools are continually telling us that we must give the +necessary time and thought to learn the language of these men before we +condemn them. Why should we? Why should not they learn the universal +language of art? It is they who are trying to say something. When they +have learned to speak that language and have convinced us that they have +something to say in it which is worth listening to, then, and not till +then, we may consent to such slight modification of it as may fit it +more closely to their thought. + +If these gentlemen really believe that their capriciously chosen symbols +are fit vehicles for communication with others, why do they fall back on +that old, old symbol, the written word? Why do they introduce, in the +very midst of a design in which everything else is dislocated, a name or +a word in clear Roman letters? Or why do they give their pictures titles +and, lest you should neglect to look in the catalogue, print the title +quite carefully and legibly in the corner of the picture itself? They +know that they must set you to hunting for their announced subject or +you would not look twice at their puzzles. + +Now, there is only one word for this denial of all law, this +insurrection against all custom and tradition, this assertion of +individual license without discipline and without restraint; and that +word is "anarchy." And, as we know, theoretic anarchy, though it may not +always lead to actual violence, is a doctrine of destruction. It is so +in art, and these artistic anarchists are found proclaiming that the +public will never understand or accept their art while anything remains +of the art of the past, and demanding that therefore the art of the past +shall be destroyed. It is actual, physical destruction of pictures and +statues that they call for, and in Italy, that great treasury of the +world's art, has been raised the sinister cry: "Burn the museums!" They +have not yet taken to the torch, but if they were sincere they would do +it; for their doctrine calls for nothing less than the reduction of +mankind to a state of primitive savagery that it may begin again at the +beginning. + +Fortunately, they are not sincere. There may be among them those who +honestly believe in that exaltation of the individual and that revolt +against all law which is the danger of our age. But, for the most part, +if they have broken from the fold and "like sheep have gone astray," +they have shown a very sheep-like disposition to follow the bell-wether. +They are fond of quoting a saying of Gauguin's that "one must be either +a revolutionist or a plagiary"; but can any one tell these +revolutionists apart? Can any one distinguish among them such definite +and logically developed personalities as mark even schoolmen and +"plagiarists" like Meissonier and Gerome? If any one of these men stood +alone, one might believe his eccentricities to be the mark of an extreme +individuality; one cannot believe it when one finds the same +eccentricities in twenty of them. + +No, it is not for the sake of unhampered personal development that young +artists are joining these new schools; it is because they are offered a +short cut to a kind of success. As there are no more laws and no more +standards, there is nothing to learn. The merest student is at once set +upon a level with the most experienced of his instructors, and boys and +girls in their teens are hailed as masters. Art is at last made easy, +and there are no longer any pupils, for all have become teachers. To +borrow Doctor Johnson's phrase, "many men, many women, and many +children" could produce art after this fashion; and they do. + +So right are the practitioners of this puerile art in their proclaimed +belief that the public will never accept it while anything else exists, +that one might be willing to treat it with the silent contempt it +deserves were it not for the efforts of certain critics and writers for +the press to convince us that it ought to be accepted. Some of these men +seem to be intimidated by the blunders of the past. Knowing that +contemporary criticism has damned almost every true artist of the +nineteenth century, they are determined not to be caught napping; and +they join in shouts of applause as each new harlequin steps upon the +stage. They forget that it is as dangerous to praise ignorantly as to +blame unjustly, and that the railer at genius, though he may seem more +malevolent, will scarce appear so ridiculous to posterity as the dupe of +the mountebank. Others of them are, no doubt, honest victims of that +illusion of progress to which we are all more or less subject--to that +ingrained belief that all evolution is upward and that the latest thing +must necessarily be the best. They forget that the same process which +has relieved man of his tail has deprived the snake of his legs and the +kiwi of his wings. They forget that art has never been and cannot be +continuously progressive; that it is only the sciences connected with +art that are capable of progress; and that the "Henriade" is not a +greater poem than the "Divine Comedy" because Voltaire has learned the +falsity of the Ptolemaic astronomy. Finally, these writers, like other +people, desire to seem knowing and clever; and if you appear to admire +vastly what no one else understands you pass for a clever man. + +I have looked through a good deal of the writings of these "up-to-date" +critics in the effort to find something like an intelligible argument +or a definite statement of belief. I have found nothing but the +continually repeated assumption that these new movements, in all their +varieties, are "living" and "vital." I can find no grounds stated for +this assumption and can suppose only that what is changing with great +rapidity is conceived to be alive; yet I know nothing more productive of +rapid changes than putrefaction. + +Do not be deceived. This is not vital art, it is decadent and corrupt. +True art has always been the expression by the artist of the ideals of +his time and of the world in which he lived--ideals which were his own +because he was a part of that world. A living and healthy art never has +existed and never can exist except through the mutual understanding and +co-operation of the artist and his public. Art is made for man and has a +social function to perform. We have a right to demand that it shall be +both human and humane; that it shall show some sympathy in the artist +with our thoughts and our feelings; that it shall interpret our ideals +to us in that universal language which has grown up in the course of +ages. We have a right to reject with pity or with scorn the stammerings +of incompetence, the babble of lunacy, or the vaporing of imposture. But +mutual understanding implies a duty on the part of the public as well as +on the part of the artist, and we must give as well as take. We must be +at the pains to learn something of the language of art in which we bid +the artist speak. If we would have beauty from him we must sympathize +with his aspiration for beauty. Above all, if we would have him +interpret for us our ideals we must have ideals worthy of such +interpretation. Without this co-operation on our part we may have a +better art than we deserve, for noble artists will be born, and they +will give us an art noble in its essence however mutilated and shorn of +its effectiveness by our neglect. It is only by being worthy of it that +we can hope to have an art we may be proud of--an art lofty in its +inspiration, consummate in its achievement, disciplined in its strength. + + + + +II + +JEAN FRANCOIS MILLET + + +Jean Francois Millet, who lived hard and died poor, is now perhaps the +most famous artist of the nineteenth century. His slightest work is +fought for by dealers and collectors, and his more important pictures, +if they chance to change hands, bring colossal and almost incredible +prices. And of all modern reputations his, so far as we can see, seems +most likely to be enduring. If any painter of the immediate past is +definitively numbered with the great masters, it is he. Yet the popular +admiration for his art is based on a I misapprehension almost as +profound as that of those contemporaries who decried and opposed him. +They thought him violent, rude, ill-educated, a "man of the woods," a +revolutionist, almost a communist. We are apt to think of him as a +gentle sentimentalist, a soul full of compassion for the hard lot of the +poor, a man whose art achieves greatness by sheer feeling rather than by +knowledge and intellect. In spite of his own letters, in spite of the +testimony of many who knew him well, in spite of more than one piece of +illuminating criticism, these two misconceptions endure; and, for the +many, Millet is still either the painter of "The Man with the Hoe," a +powerful but somewhat exceptional work, or the painter of "L'Angelus," +precisely the least characteristic picture he ever produced. There is a +legendary Millet, in many ways a very different man from the real one, +and, while the facts of his life are well known and undisputed, the +interpretation of them is colored by preconceptions and strained to make +them fit the legend. + +Altogether too much, for instance, has been made of the fact that +Millet was born a peasant. He was so, but so were half the artists and +poets who come up to Paris and fill the schools and the cafes of the +student quarters. To any one who has known these young _rapins_, and +wondered at the grave and distinguished members of the Institute into +which many of them have afterward developed, it is evident that this +studious youth--who read Virgil in the original and Homer and +Shakespeare and Goethe in translations--probably had a much more +cultivated mind and a much sounder education than most of his fellow +students under Delaroche. Seven years after this Norman farmer's son +came to Paris, with a pension of 600 francs voted by the town council of +Cherbourg, the son of a Breton sabot-maker followed him there with a +precisely similar pension voted by the town council of Roche-sur-Yon; +and the pupil of Langlois had had at least equal opportunities with +the pupil of Sartoris. Both cases were entirely typical of French +methods of encouraging the fine arts, and the peasant origin of Millet +is precisely as significant as the peasant origin of Baudry. + +[Illustration: Plate 2.--Millet. "The Sower." +In the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vanderbilt collection.] + +Baudry persevered in the course marked out for him and, after failing +three times, received the _Prix de Rome_ and became the pensioner of the +state. Millet took umbrage at Delaroche's explanation that his support +was already pledged to another candidate for the prize, and left the +_atelier_ of that master after little more than a year's work. But that +he had already acquired most of what was to be learned there is shown, +if by nothing else, by the master's promise to push him for the prize +the year following. This was in 1838, and for a year or two longer +Millet worked in the life classes of Suisse and Boudin without a master. +His pension was first cut down and then withdrawn altogether, and he +was thrown upon his own resources. His struggles and his poverty during +the next few years were those of many a young artist, aggravated, in his +case, by two imprudent marriages. But during all the time that he was +painting portraits in Cherbourg or little nudes in Paris he was steadily +gaining reputation and making friends. If we had not the pictures +themselves to show us how able and how well-trained a workman he was, +the story told us by Wyatt Eaton, in "Modern French Masters," would +convince us. It was in the last year of Millet's life that he told the +young American how, in his early days, a dealer would come to him for a +picture and, "having nothing painted, he would offer the dealer a book +and ask him to wait for a little while that he might add a few touches +to the picture." He would then go into his studio and take a fresh +canvas, or a panel, and in two hours bring out a little nude figure, +which he had painted during that time, and for which he would receive +twenty or twenty-five francs. It was the work of this time that Diaz +admired for its color and its "immortal flesh painting"; that caused +Guichard, a pupil of Ingres, to tell his master that Millet was the +finest draughtsman of the new school; that earned for its author the +title of "master of the nude." + +He did all kinds of work in these days, even painting signs and +illustrating sheet music, and it was all capital practice for a young +man, but it was not what he wanted to do. A great deal has been made of +the story of his overhearing some one speak of him as "a fellow who +never paints anything but naked women," and he is represented as +undergoing something like a sudden conversion and as resolving to "do no +more of the devil's work." As a matter of fact, he had, from the +first, wanted to paint "men at work in the fields," with their "fine +attitudes," and he only tried his hand at other things because he had +his living to earn. Sensier saw what seems to have been the first sketch +for "The Sower" as early as 1847, and it existed long before that, while +"The Winnower" was exhibited in 1848; and the overheard conversation is +said to have taken place in 1849. There was nothing indecent or immoral +in Millet's early work, and the best proof that he felt no moral +reprobation for the painting of the nude--as what true painter, +especially in France, ever did?--is that he returned to it in the height +of his power and, in the picture of the little "Goose Girl" (Pl. 1) by +the brook side, her slim, young body bared for the bath, produced the +loveliest of his works. No, what happened to Millet in 1849 was simply +that he resolved to do no more pot-boiling, to consult no one's taste +but his own, to paint what he pleased and as he pleased, if he starved +for it. He went to Barbizon for a summer's holiday and to escape the +cholera. He stayed there because living was cheap and the place was +healthful, and because he could find there the models and the subjects +on which he built his highly abstract and ideal art. + +[Illustration: Plate 3.--Millet. "The Gleaners." +In the Louvre.] + +At Barbizon he neither resumed the costume nor led the life of a +peasant. He wore sabots, as hundreds of other artists have done, before +and since, when living in the country in France. Sabots are very cheap +and very dry and not uncomfortable when you have acquired the knack of +wearing them. In other respects he dressed and lived like a small +bourgeois, and was _monsieur_ to the people about him. Barbizon was +already a summer resort for artists before he came there, and the inn +was full of painters; while others, of whom Rousseau was one, were +settled there more or less permanently. It is but a short distance from +Paris, and the exhibitions and museums were readily accessible. The life +that Millet lived there was that of many poor, self-respecting, +hard-working artists, and if he had been a landscape painter that life +would never have seemed in any way exceptional. It is only because he +was a painter of the figure that it seems odd he should have lived in +the country; only because he painted peasants that he has been thought +of as a peasant himself. If he accepted the name, with a kind of pride, +it was in protest against the frivolity and artificiality of the +fashionable art of the day. But if too much has been made of Millet's +peasant origin, perhaps hardly enough has been made of his race. It is +at least interesting that the two Frenchmen whose art has most in +common with his, Nicolas Poussin and Pierre Corneille, should have been +Normans like himself. In the severely restrained, grandly simple, +profoundly classical work of these three men, that hard-headed, +strong-handed, austere, and manly race has found its artistic +expression. + +For Millet is neither a revolutionary nor a sentimentalist, nor even a +romanticist; he is essentially a classicist of the classicists, a +conservative of the conservatives, the one modern exemplar of the grand +style. It is because his art is so old that it was "too new" for even +Corot to understand it; because he harked back beyond the +pseudoclassicism of his time to the great art of the past, and was +classic as Phidias and Giotto and Michelangelo were classic, that he +seemed strange to his contemporaries. In everything he was conservative. +He hated change; he wanted things to remain as they had always been. He +did not especially pity the hard lot of the peasant; he considered it +the natural and inevitable lot of man who "eats bread in the sweat of +his brow." He wanted the people he painted "to look as if they belonged +to their place--as if it would be impossible for them ever to think of +being anything else but what they are." In the herdsman and the +shepherd, the sower and the reaper, he saw the immemorial types of +humanity whose labors have endured since the world began and were +essentially what they now are when Virgil wrote his "Georgics" and when +Jacob kept the flocks of Laban. This is the note of all his work. It is +the permanent, the essential, the eternally significant that he paints. +The apparent localization of his subjects in time and place is an +illusion. He is not concerned with the nineteenth century or with +Barbizon but with mankind. At the very moment when the English +Pre-raphaelites were trying to found a great art on the exhaustive +imitation of natural detail, he eliminated detail as much as possible. +At the very beginning of our modern preoccupation with the direct +representation of facts, he abandoned study from the model almost +entirely and could say that he "had never painted from nature." His +subjects would have struck the amiable Sir Joshua as trivial, yet no one +has ever more completely followed that writer's precepts. His confession +of faith is in the words, "One must be able to make use of the trivial +for the expression of the sublime"; and this painter of "rustic genre" +is the world's greatest master of the sublime after Michelangelo. + +[Illustration: Plate 4.--Millet. "The Spaders."] + +The comparison with Michelangelo is inevitable and has been made again +and again by those who have felt the elemental grandeur of Millet's +work. As a recent writer has remarked: "An art highly intellectualized, +so as to convey a great idea with the lucidity of language, must needs +be controlled by genius akin to that which inspired the ceiling +paintings of the Sistine Chapel."[A] This was written of the Trajanic +sculptors, whose works both Michelangelo and Millet studied and admired, +and indeed it is to this old Roman art, or to the still older art of +Greece, that one must go for the truest parallel of Millet's temper and +his manner of working. He was less impatient, less romantic and +emotional than Michelangelo; he was graver, quieter, more serene; and if +he had little of the Greek sensuousness and the Greek love of physical +beauty, he had much of the antique clarity and simplicity. To express +his idea clearly, logically, and forcibly; to make a work of art that +should be "all of a piece" and in which "things should be where they +are for a purpose"; to admit nothing for display, for ornament, even for +beauty, that did not necessarily and inevitably grow out of his central +theme, and to suppress with an iron rigidity everything useless or +superfluous--this was his constant and conscious effort. It is an ideal +eminently austere and intellectual--an ideal, above all, especially and +eternally classic. + +[A] Eugenie Strong, "Roman Sculpture," p. 224. + +Take, for an instance, the earliest of his masterpieces, the first great +picture by which he marked his emancipation and his determination +henceforth to produce art as he understood it without regard to the +preferences of others. Many of his preliminary drawings and studies +exist and we can trace, more or less clearly, the process by which the +final result was arrived at. At first we have merely a peasant sowing +grain; an everyday incident, truly enough observed but nothing more. +Gradually the background is cut down, the space restricted, the figure +enlarged until it fills its frame as a metope of the Parthenon is +filled. The gesture is ever enlarged and given more sweep and majesty, +the silhouette is simplified and divested of all accidental or +insignificant detail. A thousand previous observations are compared and +resumed in one general and comprehensive formula, and the typical has +been evolved from the actual. What generations of Greek sculptors did in +their slow perfectioning of certain fixed types he has done almost at +once. We have no longer a man sowing, but "The Sower" (Pl. 2), +justifying the title he instinctively gave it by its air of permanence, +of inevitability, of universality. All the significance which there is +or ever has been for mankind in that primaeval action of sowing the seed +is crystallized into its necessary expression. The thing is done once +for all, and need never--can never be done again. Has any one else +had this power since Michelangelo created his "Adam"? + +[Illustration: Plate 5.--Millet. "The Potato Planters." +In the Quincy A. Shaw Collection.] + +If even Millet never again attained quite the august impressiveness of +this picture it is because no other action of rustic man has so wide or +so deep a meaning for us as this of sowing. All the meaning there is in +an action he could make us feel with entire certainty, and always he +proceeds by this method of elimination, concentration, simplification, +insistence on the essential and the essential only. One of the most +perfect of all his pictures--more perfect than "The Sower" on account of +qualities of mere painting, of color, and of the rendering of landscape, +of which I shall speak later--is "The Gleaners" (Pl. 3). Here one figure +is not enough to express the continuousness of the movement; the utmost +simplification will not make you feel, as powerfully as he wishes you to +feel it, the crawling progress, the bending together of back and +thighs, the groping of worn fingers in the stubble. The line must be +reinforced and reduplicated, and a second figure, almost a facsimile of +the first, is added. Even this is not enough. He adds a third figure, +not gathering the ear, but about to do so, standing, but stooped forward +and bounded by one great, almost uninterrupted curve from the peak of +the cap over her eyes to the heel which half slips out of the sabot, and +the thing is done. The whole day's work is resumed in that one moment. +The task has endured for hours and will endure till sunset, with only an +occasional break while the back is half-straightened--there is not time +to straighten it wholly. It is the triumph of significant composition, +as "The Sower" is the triumph of significant draughtsmanship. + +Or, when an action is more complicated and difficult of suggestion, as +is that, for instance, of digging, he takes it at the beginning and at +the end, as in "The Spaders" (Pl. 4), and makes you understand +everything between. One man is doubled over his spade, his whole weight +brought to bear on the pressing foot which drives the blade into the +ground. The other, with arms outstretched, gives the twisting motion +which lets the loosened earth fall where it is to lie. Each of these +positions is so thoroughly understood and so definitely expressed that +all the other positions of the action are implied in them. You feel the +recurrent rhythm of the movement and could almost count the falling of +the clods. + +So far did Millet push the elimination of non-essentials that his heads +have often scarcely any features, his hands, one might say, are without +fingers, and his draperies are so simplified as to suggest the witty +remark that his peasants are too poor to afford any folds in their +garments. The setting of the great, bony planes of jaw and cheek and +temple, the bulk and solidity of the skull, and the direction of the +face--these were, often enough, all he wanted of a head. Look at the +hand of the woman in "The Potato Planters" (Pl. 5), or at those of the +man in the same picture, and see how little detail there is in them, yet +how surely the master's sovereign draughtsmanship has made you feel +their actual structure and function! And how inevitably the garments, +with their few and simple folds, mould and accent the figures beneath +them, "becoming, as it were, a part of the body and expressing, even +more than the nude, the larger and simpler forms of nature"! How +explicitly the action of the bodies is registered, how perfectly the +amount of effort apparent is proportioned to the end to be attained! One +can feel, to an ounce, it seems, the strain upon the muscles implied by +that hoe-full of earth. Or look at the easier attitude of "The +Grafter" (Pl. 6), engaged upon his gentler task, and at the monumental +silhouette of the wife, standing there, babe in arms, a type of eternal +motherhood and of the fruitfulness to come. + +[Illustration: Plate 6.--Millet. "The Grafter." +In the collection of William Rockefeller.] + +Oftener than anything, perhaps, it was the sense of weight that +interested Millet. It is the adjustment of her body to the weight of the +child she carries that gives her statuesque pose to the wife of the +grafter. It is the drag of the buckets upon the arms that gives her +whole character to the magnificent "Woman Carrying Water," in the +Vanderbilt collection. It is the erect carriage, the cautious, rhythmic +walk, keeping step together, forced upon them by the sense of weight, +which gives that gravity and solemnity to the bearers of "The New-Born +Calf" (Pl. 7), which was ridiculed by Millet's critics as more befitting +the bearers of the bull Apis or the Holy Sacrament. The artist himself +was explicit in this instance as in that of the "Woman Carrying Water." +"The expression of two men carrying a load on a litter," he says, +"naturally depends on the weight which rests upon their arms. Thus, if +the weight is equal, their expression will be the same, whether they +bear the Ark of the Covenant or a calf, an ingot of gold or a stone." +Find that expression, whether in face or figure, render it clearly, +"with largeness and simplicity," and you have a great, a grave, a +classic work of art. "We are never so truly Greek," he said, "as when we +are simply painting our own impressions." Certainly his own way of +painting his impressions was more Greek than anything else in the whole +range of modern art. + +In the epic grandeur of such pictures as these there is something akin +to sadness, though assuredly Millet did not mean them to be sad. Did he +not say of the "Woman Carrying Water": "I have avoided, as I always do, +with a sort of horror, everything that might verge on the sentimental"? +He wished her to seem "to do her work simply and cheerfully ... as a +part of her daily task and the habit of her life." And he was not always +in the austere and epical mood. He could be idyllic as well, and if he +could not see "the joyous side" of life or nature he could feel and make +us feel the charm of tranquillity. Indeed, this remark of his about the +joyous side of things was made in the dark, early days when life was +hardest for him. He broadened in his view as he grew older and +conditions became more tolerable, and he has painted a whole series of +little pictures of family life and of childhood that, in their smiling +seriousness, are endlessly delightful. The same science, the same +thoughtfulness, the same concentration and intellectual grasp that +defined for us the superb gesture of "The Sower" have gone to the +depiction of the adorable uncertainty, between walking and falling, of +those "First Steps" (Pl. 8) from the mother's lap to the outstretched +arms of the father; and the result, in this case as in the other, is a +thing perfectly and permanently expressed. Whatever Millet has done is +done. He has "characterized the type," as it was his dream to do, and +written "hands off" across his subject for all future adventurers. + +Finally, he rises to an almost lyric fervor in that picture of the +little "Goose Girl" bathing, which is one of the most purely and +exquisitely beautiful things in art. In this smooth, young body +quivering with anticipation of the coolness of the water; in these +rounded, slender limbs with their long, firm, supple lines; in the +unconscious, half-awkward grace of attitude and in the glory of +sunlight splashing through the shadow of the willows, there is a whole +song of joy and youth and the goodness of the world. The picture exists +in a drawing or pastel, which has been photographed by Braun, as well as +in the oil-painting, and Millet's habit of returning again and again to +a favorite subject renders it difficult to be certain which is the +earlier of the two; but I imagine this drawing to be a study for the +picture. At first sight the figure in it is more obviously beautiful +than in the other version, and it is only after a time that one begins +to understand the changes that the artist was impelled to make. It is +almost too graceful, too much like an antique nymph. No one could find +any fault with it, but by an almost imperceptible stiffening of the line +here and there, a little greater turn of the foot upon the ankle and of +the hand upon the wrist, the figure in the painting has been given an +accent of rusticity that makes it more human, more natural, and more +appealing. She is no longer a possible Galatea or Arethusa, she is only +a goose girl, and we feel but the more strongly on that account the +eternal poem of the healthy human form. + +[Illustration: Plate 7.--Millet. "The New-Born Calf." +In the Art Institute, Chicago.] + +The especial study of the nineteenth century was landscape, and Millet +was so far a man of his time that he was a great landscape painter; but +his treatment of landscape was unlike any other, and, like his own +treatment of the figure, in its insistence on essentials, its +elimination of the accidental, its austere and grand simplicity. I have +heard, somewhere, a story of his saying, in answer to praise of his work +or inquiry as to his meaning: "I was trying to express the difference +between the things that lie flat and the things that stand upright." +That is the real motive of one of his masterpieces--one that in some +moods seems the greatest of them all--"The Shepherdess" (Pl. 9), that +is, or used to be, in the Chauchard collection. In this nobly tranquil +work, in which there is no hint of sadness or revolt, are to be found +all his usual inevitableness of composition and perfection of +draughtsmanship--note the effect of repetition in the sheep, "forty +feeding like one"--but the glory of the picture is in the infinite +recession of the plain that lies flat, the exact notation of the +successive positions upon it of the things that stand upright, from the +trees and the hay wain in the extreme distance, almost lost in sky, +through the sheep and the sheep-dog and the shepherdess herself, +knitting so quietly, to the dandelions in the foreground, each with its +"aureole" of light. Of these simple, geometrical relations, and of the +enveloping light and air by which they are expressed, he has made a hymn +of praise. + +The background of "The Gleaners," with its baking stubble-field under +the midday sun, its grain stacks and laborers and distant farmstead, all +tremulous in the reflected waves of heat, indistinct and almost +indecipherable yet unmistakable, is nearly as wonderful; and no one has +ever so rendered the solemnity and the mystery of night as has he in the +marvellous "Sheepfold" of the Walters collection. But the greatest of +all his landscapes--one of the greatest landscapes ever painted--is his +"Spring" (Pl. 10), of the Louvre, a pure landscape this time, containing +no figure. In the intense green of the sunlit woods against the black +rain-clouds that are passing away, in the jewel-like brilliancy of the +blossoming apple-trees, and the wet grass in that clear air after the +shower; in the glorious rainbow drawn in dancing light across the sky, +we may see, if anywhere in art, some reflection of the "infinite +splendors" which Millet tells us he saw in nature. + +[Illustration: Plate 8.--Millet. "The First Steps."] + +In the face of such results as these it seems absurd to discuss the +question whether or not Millet was technically a master of his trade, as +if the methods that produced them could possibly be anything but good +methods for the purpose; but it is still too much the fashion to say and +think that the great artist was a poor painter--to speak slightingly of +his accomplishment in oil-painting and to seem to prefer his drawings +and pastels to his pictures. We have seen that he was a supremely able +technician in his pot-boiling days and that the color and handling of +his early pictures were greatly admired by so brilliant a virtuoso as +Diaz. But this "flowery manner" would not lend itself to the expression +of his new aims and he had to invent another. He did so stumblingly at +first, and the earliest pictures of his grand style have a certain +harshness and ruggedness of surface and heaviness of color which his +critics could not forgive any more than the Impressionists, who have +outdone that ruggedness, can forgive him his frequent use of a warm +general tone inclining to brownness. His ideal of form and of +composition he possessed complete from the beginning; his mastery of +light and color and the handling of materials was slower of acquirement; +but he did acquire it, and in the end he is as absolute a master of +painting as of drawing. He did not see nature in blue and violet, as +Monet has taught us to see it, and little felicities and facilities of +rendering, and anything approaching cleverness or the parade of +virtuosity he hated; but he knew just what could be done with thick or +thin painting, with opaque or transparent pigment, and he could make his +few and simple colors say anything he chose. In his mature work there is +a profound knowledge of the means to be employed and a great economy +in their use, and there is no approach to indiscriminate or meaningless +loading. "Things are where they are for a purpose," and if the surface +of a picture is rough in any place it is because just that degree of +roughness was necessary to attain the desired effect. He could make mere +paint express light as few artists have been able to do--"The +Shepherdess" is flooded with it--and he could do this without any +sacrifice of the sense of substance in the things on which the light +falls. If some of his canvases are brown it is because brown seemed to +him the appropriate note to express what he had to say; "The Gleaners" +glows with almost the richness of a Giorgione, and other pictures are +honey-toned or cool and silvery or splendidly brilliant. And in whatever +key he painted, the harmony of his tones and colors is as large, as +simple, and as perfect as the harmony of his lines and masses. + +[Illustration: Plate 9.--Millet. "The Shepherdess." +In the Chauchard collection, Louvre.] + +But if we cannot admit that Millet's drawings are better than his +paintings, we may be very glad he did them. His great epic of the soil +must have lacked many episodes, perhaps whole books and cantos, if it +had been written only in the slower and more elaborate method. The +comparative slightness and rapidity of execution of his drawings and +pastels enabled him to register many inventions and observations that we +must otherwise have missed, and many of these are of the highest value. +His long training in seizing the essential in anything he saw enabled +him, often, to put more meaning into a single rapid line than another +could put into a day's painful labor, and some of his slightest sketches +are astonishingly and commandingly expressive. Other of his drawings +were worked out and pondered over almost as lovingly as his completest +pictures. But so instinctively and inevitably was he a composer that +everything he touched is a complete whole--his merest sketch or his most +elaborated design is a unit. He has left no fragments. His paintings, +his countless drawings, his few etchings and woodcuts are all of a +piece. About everything there is that air of finality which marks the +work destined to become permanently a classic. + +[Illustration: Plate 10.--Millet. "Spring." +In the Louvre.] + +Here and there, by one or another writer, most or all of what I have +been trying to say has been said already. It is the more likely to be +true. And if these true things have been said, many other things have +been said also which seem to me not so true, or little to the purpose, +so that the image I have been trying to create must differ, for better +or for worse, from that which another might have made. At least I may +have looked at the truth from a slightly different angle and so have +shown it in a new perspective. And, at any rate, it is well that true +things should be said again from time to time. It can do no harm that +one more person should endeavor to give a reason for his admiration of a +great and true artist and should express his conviction that among the +world's great masters the final place of Jean Francois Millet is not +destined to be the lowest. + + + + + +III + +THE ILLUSION OF PROGRESS[B] + +[B] Read before the joint meeting of The American Academy of Arts and +Letters and The National Institute of Arts and Letters, December 13, 1912. + + +In these days all of us, even Academicians, are to some extent believers +in progress. Our golden age is no longer in the past, but in the future. +We know that our early ancestors were a race of wretched cave-dwellers, +and we believe that our still earlier ancestors were possessed of tails +and pointed ears. Having come so far, we are sometimes inclined to +forget that not every step has been an advance and to entertain an +illogical confidence that each future step must carry us still further +forward; having indubitably progressed in many things, we think of +ourselves as progressing in all. And as the pace of progress in science +and in material things has become more and more rapid, we have come to +expect a similar pace in art and letters, to imagine that the art of the +future must be far finer than the art of the present or than that of the +past, and that the art of one decade, or even of one year, must +supersede that of the preceding decade or the preceding year, as the +1913 model in automobiles supersedes the model of 1912. More than ever +before "To have done is to hang quite out of fashion," and the only +title to consideration is to do something quite obviously new or to +proclaim one's intention of doing something newer. The race grows madder +and madder. It was scarce two years since we first heard of "Cubism" +when the "Futurists" were calling the "Cubists" reactionary. Even the +gasping critics, pounding manfully in the rear, have thrown away all +impedimenta of traditional standards in the desperate effort to keep up +with what seems less a march than a stampede. + +But while we talk so loudly of progress in the arts we have an uneasy +feeling that we are not really progressing. If our belief in our own art +were as full-blooded as was that of the great creative epochs, we should +scarce be so reverent of the art of the past. It is, perhaps, a sign of +anaemia that we have become founders of museums and conservers of old +buildings. If we are so careful of our heritage, it is surely from some +doubt of our ability to replace it. When art has been vigorously alive +it has been ruthless in its treatment of what has gone before. No +cathedral builder thought of reconciling his own work to that of the +builder who preceded him; he built in his own way, confident of its +superiority. And when the Renaissance builder came, in his turn, he +contemptuously dismissed all mediaeval art as "Gothic" and barbarous, and +was as ready to tear down an old facade as to build a new one. Even the +most cock-sure of our moderns might hesitate to emulate Michelangelo in +his calm destruction of three frescoes by Perugino to make room for his +own "Last Judgment." He, at least, had the full courage of his +convictions, and his opinion of Perugino is of record. + +Not all of us would consider even Michelangelo's arrogance entirely +justified, but it is not only the Michelangelos who have had this belief +in themselves. Apparently the confidence of progress has been as great +in times that now seem to us decadent as in times that we think of as +truly progressive. The past, or at least the immediate past, has always +seemed "out of date," and each generation, as it made its entrance on +the stage, has plumed itself upon its superiority to that which was +leaving it. The architect of the most debased baroque grafted his +"improvements" upon the buildings of the high Renaissance with an +assurance not less than that with which David and his contemporaries +banished the whole charming art of the eighteenth century. Van Orley and +Frans Floris were as sure of their advance upon the ancient Flemish +painting of the Van Eycks and of Memling as Rubens himself must have +been of his advance upon them. + +We can see plainly enough that in at least some of these cases the sense +of progress was an illusion. There was movement, but it was not always +forward movement. And if progress was illusory in some instances, may it +not, possibly, have been so in all? It is at least worth inquiry how far +the fine arts have ever been in a state of true progress, going forward +regularly from good to better, each generation building on the work of +its predecessors and surpassing that work, in the way in which science +has normally progressed when material conditions were favorable. + +If, with a view to answering this question, we examine, however +cursorily, the history of the five great arts, we shall find a somewhat +different state of affairs in the case of each. In the end it may be +possible to formulate something like a general rule that shall accord +with all the facts. Let us begin with the greatest and simplest of the +arts, the art of poetry. + +In the history of poetry we shall find less evidence of progress than +anywhere else, for it will be seen that its acknowledged masterpieces +are almost invariably near the beginning of a series rather than near +the end. Almost as soon as a clear and flexible language has been formed +by any people, a great poem has been composed in that language, which +has remained not only unsurpassed, but unequalled, by any subsequent +work. Homer is for us, as he was for the Greeks, the greatest of their +poets; and if the opinion could be taken of all cultivated readers in +those nations that have inherited the Greek tradition, it is doubtful +whether he would not be acclaimed the greatest poet of the ages. Dante +has remained the first of Italian poets, as he was one of the earliest. +Chaucer, who wrote when our language was transforming itself from +Anglo-Saxon into English, has still lovers who are willing for his sake +to master what is to them almost a foreign tongue, and yet other lovers +who ask for new translations of his works into our modern idiom; while +Shakespeare, who wrote almost as soon as that transformation had been +accomplished, is universally reckoned one of the greatest of world +poets. There have, indeed, been true poets at almost all stages of the +world's history, but the pre-eminence of such masters as these can +hardly be questioned, and if we looked to poetry alone for a type of the +arts, we should almost be forced to conclude that art is the reverse of +progressive. We should think of it as gushing forth in full splendor +when the world is ready for it, and as unable ever again to rise to the +level of its fount. + +The art of architecture is later in its beginning than that of poetry, +for it can exist only when men have learned to build solidly and +permanently. A nomad may be a poet, but he cannot be an architect; a +herdsman might have written the Book of Job, but the great builders are +dwellers in cities. But since men first learned to build they have never +quite forgotten how to do so. At all times there have been somewhere +peoples who knew enough of building to mould its utility into forms of +beauty, and the history of architecture may be read more continuously +than that of any other art. It is a history of constant change and of +continuous development, each people and each age forming out of the old +elements a new style which should express its mind, and each style +reaching its point of greatest distinctiveness only to begin a further +transformation into something else; but is it a history of progress? +Building, indeed, has progressed at one time or another. The Romans, +with their domes and arches, were more scientific builders than the +Greeks, with their simple post and lintel, but were they better +architects? We of to-day, with our steel construction, can scrape the +sky with erections that would have amazed the boldest of mediaeval +craftsmen; can we equal his art? If we ask where in the history of +architecture do its masterpieces appear, the answer must be: "Almost +anywhere." Wherever men have had the wealth and the energy to build +greatly, they have builded beautifully, and the distinctions are less +between style and style or epoch and epoch than between building and +building: The masterpieces of one time are as the masterpieces of +another, and no man may say that the nave of Amiens is finer than the +Parthenon or that the Parthenon is nobler than the nave of Amiens. One +may say only that each is perfect in its kind, a supreme expression of +the human spirit. + +Of the art of music I must speak with the diffidence becoming to the +ignorant; but it seems to me to consist of two elements and to contain +an inspirational art as direct and as simple as that of poetry, and a +science so difficult that its fullest mastery is of very recent +achievement. In melodic invention it is so far from progressive that its +most brilliant masters are often content to elaborate and to decorate a +theme old enough to have no history--a theme the inventor of which has +been so entirely forgotten that we think of it as sprung not from the +mind of one man, but from that of a whole people, and call it a +folk-song. The song is almost as old as the race, but the symphony has +had to wait for the invention of many instruments and for a mastery of +the laws of harmony, and so symphonic music is a modern art. We are +still adding new instruments to the orchestra and admitting to our +compositions new combinations of sounds, but have we in a hundred years +made any essential progress even in this part of the art? Have we +produced anything, I will not say greater, but anything as great as the +noblest works of Bach and Beethoven? + +Already, and before considering the arts of painting and sculpture, we +are coming within sight of our general law. This law seems to be that, +so far as an art is dependent upon any form of exact knowledge, so far +it partakes of the nature of science and is capable of progress. So far +as it is expressive of a mind and soul, its greatness is dependent upon +the greatness of that mind and soul, and it is incapable of progress. It +may even be the reverse of progressive, because as an art becomes more +complicated and makes ever greater demands upon technical mastery, it +becomes more difficult as a medium of expression, while the mind to be +expressed becomes more sophisticated and less easy of expression in any +medium. It would take a greater mind than Homer's to express modern +ideas in modern verse with Homer's serene perfection; it would take, +perhaps, a greater mind than Bach's to employ all the resources of +modern music with his glorious ease and directness. And greater minds +than those of Bach and Homer the world has not often the felicity to +possess. + +The arts of painting and sculpture are imitative arts above all others, +and therefore more dependent than any others upon exact knowledge, more +tinged with the quality of science. Let us see how they illustrate our +supposed law. + +Sculpture depends, as does architecture, upon certain laws of proportion +in space which are analogous to the laws of proportion in time and in +pitch upon which music is founded. But as sculpture represents the human +figure, whereas architecture and music represent nothing, sculpture +requires for its perfection the mastery of an additional science, which +is the knowledge of the structure and movement of the human body. This +knowledge may be acquired with some rapidity, especially in times and +countries where man is often seen unclothed. So, in the history of +civilizations, sculpture developed early, after poetry, but with +architecture, and before painting and polyphonic music. It reached the +greatest perfection of which it is capable in the age of Pericles, and +from that time progress was impossible to it, and for a thousand years +its movement was one of decline. After the dark ages sculpture was one +of the first arts to revive; and again it develops rapidly--though not +so rapidly as before, conditions of custom and climate being less +favorable to it--until it reaches, in the first half of the sixteenth +century, something near its former perfection. Again it can go no +further; and since then it has changed but has not progressed. In +Phidias, by which name I would signify the sculptor of the pediments of +the Parthenon, we have the coincidence of a superlatively great artist +with the moment of technical and scientific perfection in the art, and a +similar coincidence crowns the work of Michelangelo with a peculiar +glory. But, apart from the work of these two men, a the essential value +of a work of sculpture is by no means always equal to its technical and +scientific completeness. There are archaic statues that are almost as +nobly beautiful as any work by Phidias and more beautiful than almost +any work that has been done since his time. There are bits of Gothic +sculpture that are more valuable expressions of human feeling than +anything produced by the contemporaries of Buonarroti. Even in times of +decadence a great artist has created finer things than could be +accomplished by a mediocre talent of the great epochs, and the world +could ill spare the Victory of Samothrace or the portrait busts of +Houdon. + +As sculpture is one of the simplest of the arts, painting is one of the +most complicated. The harmonies it constructs are composed of almost +innumerable elements of lines and forms and colors and degrees of +light and dark, and the science it professes is no less than that of the +visible aspect of the whole of nature--a science so vast that it never +has been and perhaps never can be mastered in its totality. Anything +approaching a complete art of painting can exist only in an advanced +stage of civilization. An entirely complete art of painting never has +existed and probably never will exist. The history of painting, after +its early stages, is a history of loss here balancing gain there, of a +new means of expression acquired at the cost of an old one. + +We know comparatively little of the painting of antiquity, but we have +no reason to suppose that that art, however admirable, ever attained to +ripeness, and we know that the painting of the Orient has stopped short +at a comparatively early stage of development. For our purpose the art +to be studied is the painting of modern times in Europe from its origin +in the Middle Ages. Even in the beginning, or before the beginning, +while painting is a decadent reminiscence of the past rather than a +prophecy of the new birth, there are decorative splendors in the +Byzantine mosaics hardly to be recaptured. Then comes primitive +painting, an art of the line and of pure color with little modulation +and no attempt at the rendering of solid form. It gradually attains to +some sense of relief by the use of degrees of light and less light; but +the instant it admits the true shadow the old brightness and purity of +color have become impossible. The line remains dominant for a time and +is carried to the pitch of refinement and beauty, but the love for solid +form gradually overcomes it, and in the art of the high Renaissance it +takes a second place. Then light-and-shade begins to be studied for its +own sake; color, no longer pure and bright, but deep and resonant, comes +in again; the line vanishes altogether, and even form becomes +secondary. The last step is taken by Rembrandt, and even color is +subordinated to light-and-shade, which exists alone in a world of +brownness. At every step there has been progress, but there has also +been regress. Perhaps the greatest balance of gain against loss and the +nearest approach to a complete art of painting were with the great +Venetians. The transformation is still going on, and in our own day we +have conquered some corners of the science of visible aspects which were +unexplored by our ancestors. But the balance has turned against us; our +loss has been greater than our gain; and our art, even in its scientific +aspect, is inferior to that of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. + +And just because there never has been a complete art of painting, +entirely rounded and perfected, it is the clearer to us that the final +value of a work in that art never has depended on its approach to such +completion. There is no one supreme master of painting but a long +succession of masters of different yet equal glory. If the masterpieces +of architecture are everywhere because there has often been a complete +art of architecture, the masterpieces of painting are everywhere for the +opposite reason. And if we do not always value a master the more as his +art is more nearly complete, neither do we always value him especially +who has placed new scientific conquests at the disposal of art. Palma +Vecchio painted by the side of Titian, but he is only a minor master; +Botticelli remained of the generation before Leonardo, but he is one of +the immortal great. Paolo Ucello, by his study of perspective, made a +distinct advance in pictorial science, but his interest for us is purely +historic; Fra Angelico made no advance whatever, but he practised +consummately the current art as he found it, and his work is eternally +delightful. At every stage of its development the art of painting has +been a sufficient medium for the expression of a great man's mind; and +wherever and whenever a great man has practised it, the result has been +a great and permanently valuable work of art. + +For this seems, finally, to be the law of all the arts--the one +essential prerequisite to the production of a great work of art is a +great man. You cannot have the art without the man, and when you have +the man you have the art. His time and his surroundings will color him; +his art will not be at one time or place precisely what it might be at +another; but at bottom the art is the man and at all times and in all +countries is just as great as the man. + +Let us clear our minds, then, of the illusion that there is in any +important sense such a thing as progress in the fine arts. We may with +a clear conscience judge every new work for what it appears in itself to +be, asking of it that it be noble and beautiful and reasonable, not that +it be novel or progressive. If it be great art it will always be novel +enough, for there will be a great mind behind it, and no two great minds +are alike. And if it be novel without being great, how shall we be the +better off? There are enough forms of mediocre or evil art in the world +already. Being no longer intimidated by the fetich of progress, when a +thing calling itself a work of art seems to us hideous and degraded, +indecent and insane, we shall have the courage to say so and shall not +care to investigate it further. Detestable things have been produced in +the past, and they are none the less detestable because we are able to +see how they came to be produced. Detestable things are produced now, +and they will be no more admirable if we learn to understand the minds +that create them. Even should such things prove to be not the mere +freaks of a diseased intellect that they seem but a necessary outgrowth +of the conditions of the age and a true prophecy of "the art of the +future," they are not necessarily the better for that. It is only that +the future will be very unlucky in its art. + + + + + +IV + +RAPHAEL + + +There used to be on the cover of the "Portfolio Monographs" little +medallions of Raphael and Rembrandt, placed there, as the editor, Mr. +Hamerton, has somewhere explained, as portraits of the two most widely +influential artists that ever lived. In the eighteenth century, one +imagines, Rembrandt's presence by the side of Raphael would have been +thought little less than a scandal. To-day it is Raphael's place that +would be contested, and he would be superseded, likely enough, by +Velazquez. + +There is no more striking instance of the vicissitudes of critical +opinion than the sudden fall of Raphael from his conceded rank as "the +prince of painters." Up to the middle of the nineteenth century his +right to that title was so uncontested that it alone was a sufficient +identification of him--only one man could possibly be meant. That he +should ever need defending or re-explaining to a generation grown cold +to him would have seemed incredible. Then came the rediscovery of an +earlier art that seemed more frank and simple than his; still later the +discovery of Rembrandt and Velazquez--the romanticist and the +naturalist--and Raphael, as a living influence, almost ceased to exist. +It was but a few years ago that the author of a volume of essays on art +was gravely praised by a reviewer for the purely accidental circumstance +that that volume contained no essay on Raphael; and a little later the +writer of a book on the pictures in Rome "had to confess unutterable +boredom" in the presence of the Stanze of the Vatican. + +It is not probable that any critic who greatly valued his reputation, or +who had any serious reputation to value, would take quite this tone; +but, leaving out of consideration the impressionistic and ultra-modern +criticism which ignores Raphael altogether, it is instructive to note +the way in which a critic so steeped in Italian art as Mr. Berenson +approaches the fallen prince. The artist who used to be considered the +greatest of draughtsmen he will hardly admit to be a draughtsman at all, +ranking him far below Pollaiuolo and positively speaking of him as "a +poor creature, most docile and patient." As a colorist and a manipulator +of paint, he places him with Sebastiano del Piombo--that is, among the +mediocrities. Almost the only serious merit, from his point of view, +which he will allow him is a mastery in the rendering of space, shared +in nearly equal measure by Perugino, as, to some extent, by nearly all +the painters of the Umbrian school. For, while he admits that Raphael +was the greatest master of composition that Europe has produced, he +evidently thinks of composition, as do so many other moderns, as a +matter of relatively little importance. + +It is not Raphael's popularity that is in question; that is, perhaps, as +great as ever it was. His works, in one form or another of reproduction, +from the finest carbon print to the cheapest lithograph, are still to be +found, in the humblest homes as in the most splendid, in nearly every +quarter of the globe. That popularity was always based on what Berenson +calls the "illustrative" qualities of Raphael's work, on the beauty of +his women, the majesty of his men; on his ability to tell a story as we +like it told and to picture a world that we wish might be real. One may +not be prepared to consider these illustrative qualities so negligible +as do many modern critics, or to echo Mr. Berenson's phrase about "that +which in art ... is so unimportant as what ... we call beauty." One +might point out that the greatest artists, from Phidias to Rembrandt, +have occupied themselves with illustration, and that to formulate the +ideals of a race and an epoch is no mean task. But, for the moment, we +may neglect all that, our present inquiry being why an artist, once +counted the greatest of all, is no longer considered very significant by +those who measure by purely artistic standards rather than by that of +illustrative success and consequent popularity. + +We may also leave out of our present consideration Raphael's achievement +in the suggestion of space. It is a very real quality and a high one. It +has doubtless always been an important element in the enjoyability of +Raphael's art, as it is almost the only enjoyable element, for many of +us, in the art of Perugino. But it is an element that has only very +recently been clearly perceived to exist. If it was enjoyed by the +artists and critics, from Raphael's day almost to our own, they were +unconscious of the fact, and the probability is that we enjoy it more +than they did. It will not account for the estimation in which they held +Raphael, and still less will it account for the relative lack of +interest in him to-day. + +In truth the reason why many modern critics and painters almost dislike +Raphael is the very reason for which he was so greatly revered. Coming +in the nick of time, at the close of an epoch of investigation, himself +a man of wide culture and quick intellect but of no special originality +or emotional power, he learned from all his predecessors what they had +to teach and, choosing from the elements of their art those which were +suited to his purpose, formed a perfectly balanced and noble style which +was immediately accepted as the only style suitable to the expression of +lofty ideas in monumental form. He became the lawgiver, the founder of +classicism, the formulator of the academic ideal. Not to admire him was +to confess oneself a barbarian, and even those who did not really care +for his art hardly dared to say so. As long as the academic ideal +retained any validity his supremacy endured, and it was only with the +definitive turning of modern art into the paths of romanticism and +naturalism that revolt became possible. + +But when the world became tired of Raphaelism it inevitably became +unjust to Raphael. It forgot that it was not he who had made his art the +test of that of others--who had erected what, with him, was a +spontaneous and original creation into a rigid system of laws. It +confounded him with his followers and imitators, and, being bored by +them, began to find the master himself a bore. + +For, eclectic as he was by nature, and founder as he was of the academic +regime, the "grand style" of Raphael was yet a new and personal +contribution to art. He drew from many sources, but the principle of +combination was his own. His originality was in that mastery of +composition which no one has ever denied him, but which is very +differently rated as a quality of art by different temperaments. Almost +everything specifically Raphaelesque in his work is the offspring of +that power of design in which he is still the unapproached master. +Modern criticism is right in denying that he was a draughtsman, if by +draughtsman is meant one deeply preoccupied with form and structure for +its own sake. His distinction was to invest the human figure with such +forms as should best fit it to play its part in a scheme of monumental +composition. The "style" of his draperies, so much and so justly +admired, is composition of draperies. He was not a colorist as Titian +was a colorist, or a painter as Velazquez was a painter--he was just so +much of a colorist and a painter as is compatible with being the +greatest of decorative designers. Everything in his finest works is +entirely subordinated to the beauty and expressiveness of composition, +and nothing is allowed to have too great an individual interest for its +predestined part in the final result. Probably he could not have drawn +like Michelangelo or painted like Hals--certainly, when he once +understood himself, he would not have desired to do so. + +Even in his early work he showed his gifts as a composer, and some of +the small pictures of his Florentine period are quite perfect in +design. Nothing could be better composed within their restricted field +than the "Madonna del Cardellino" or the "Belle Jardiniere." Nearly at +the end of the period he made his greatest failure, the "Entombment" of +the Borghese Gallery. It was his most ambitious effort up to this time +and he wanted to put everything that he had learned into it, to draw +like Michelangelo and to express emotion like Mantegna. He made a host +of studies for it, tried it this way and that, lost all spontaneity and +all grasp of the ensemble. What he finally produced is a thing of +fragments, falling far below his models in the qualities he was +attempting to rival and redeemed by little or nothing of the quality +proper to himself. But, apparently, it answered its purpose. It freed +him from preoccupation with the work of others. When his great +opportunity came to him, in the commission to decorate the Camera della +Segnatura, his painfully acquired knowledge was sufficiently at his +command to give him no further trouble. He could concentrate himself on +the essential part of his problem, the creation of an entirely +appropriate, dignified, and beautiful decorative design. It was the work +for which he was born, and he succeeded so immediately and so admirably +in it that neither he nor any one else has ever been able to fill such +spaces so perfectly again. + +There are fourteen important compositions in the room. The decoration of +the ceiling had already been begun by Sodoma, and Sodoma's decorative +framework Raphael allowed to remain; partly, perhaps, from courtesy, +more probably because its general disposition was admirable and not to +be improved on. If Sodoma had begun any of the larger paintings which +were to fill his frames they were removed to make way for the new work. +There has always been a great deal of discussion as to whether Raphael +himself invented the admirable scheme of subjects by which the room was +made to illustrate the Renaissance ideal of culture with its division +into the four great fields of learning: divinity, philosophy (including +science), poetry, and law. In reality, the question is of little +importance. There seems to be at least one bit of internal evidence, to +be mentioned presently, that even here the artist did not have a +perfectly free hand, as we know he did not later. Whoever thought of the +subjects, it was Raphael who discovered how to treat them in such a way +as to make of this room the most perfectly planned piece of decoration +in the world. Sodoma had left, on the vaulting, four circular medallions +and four rectangular spaces which were to be filled with figure +compositions. In the circles, each directly above one of the great wall +spaces, Raphael placed figures personifying Theology, Philosophy, +Poetry and Justice; in the rectangles he illustrated these subjects with +the stories of "The Fall of Man," "Apollo and Marsyas," and "The +Judgment of Solomon," and with that figure, leaning over a celestial +globe, which must be meant for Science. All of these panels are on +curved surfaces, and Raphael's decorative instinct led him, on this +account and to preserve the supremacy of the great wall spaces below, to +suppress all distance, placing his figures against a background of +simulated gold mosaic and arranging them, virtually, upon one plane. +There is, therefore, no possible question of "space composition" here. +These panels depend for their effect entirely upon composition in two +dimensions--upon the perfect balancing of filled and empty spaces, the +invention of interesting shapes, and the arrangement of beautiful lines. +It is the pattern that counts, and the pattern is perfect. + +The "Poetry" (Pl. 11) is the most beautiful of the medallions, but they +are all much alike: a draped female figure in the middle, seated to give +it scale, large enough to fill the height of the circle amply but +without crowding, and winged _putti_, bearing inscribed tablets, on +either side. There are other ways of filling a circle acceptably, as +Botticelli had shown and as Raphael was to show again in more than one +_tondo_, but for their situation, marking the principal axes of the +room, there is no way so adequate as this. As Mr. Blashfield has said, +speaking from experience: "When a modern painter has a medallion to fill +and has tried one arrangement after another, he inevitably realizes that +it is Raphael who has found the best ordering that could be found; and +the modern painter builds upon his lines, laid down so distinctly that +the greater the practice of the artist the more complete becomes his +realization of Raphael's comprehension of essentials in composition." +Not only so, but the modern painter finds as inevitably that, accepting +this ordering as the best, even then he cannot add another figure to +these four. He may, perhaps, draw it better in detail or give more +character to the head, but he cannot capture that felicity of spacing, +that absoluteness of balance, that variety and vivacity combined with +monumental repose. The more his nature and training have made him a +designer the more certainly he feels, before that single medallion of +Poetry, that he is in the presence of the inimitable master of design. + +[Illustration: Plate 11.--Raphael. "Poetry." +In the Vatican.] + +If the composition of the rectangles is less inevitable it is only +because the variety of ways in which such simple rectangles may be +filled is almost infinite. Composition more masterly than that of the +"Judgment of Solomon" (Pl. 12), for instance, you will find nowhere; so +much is told in a restricted space, yet with no confusion, the space is +so admirably filled and its shape so marked by the very lines that +enrich and relieve it. It is as if the design had determined the space +rather than the space the design. If you had a tracing of the figures in +the midst of an immensity of white paper you could not bound them by any +other line than that of the actual frame. One of the most remarkable +things about it is the way in which the angles, which artists usually +avoid and disguise, are here sharply accented. A great part of the +dignity and importance given to the king is due to the fact that his +head fills one of these angles, and the opposite one contains the hand +of the executioner and the foot by which the living child is held aloft, +and to this point the longest lines of the picture lead. The dead +child and the indifferent mother fill the lower corners. In the middle, +herself only half seen and occupying little space, is the true mother, +and it seems that her explosive energy, as she rushes to the rescue of +her child, has forced all these other figures back to the confines of +the picture. Compare this restless yet subtly balanced composition, full +of oblique lines and violent movement, with the gracious, placid +formality of the "Adam and Eve," and you will have some notion of the +meaning of this gift of design. + +[Illustration: Plate 12.--Raphael. "The Judgment of Solomon." +In the Vatican.] + +But it is the frescoes on the four walls of this room which are +Raphael's greatest triumphs--the most perfect pieces of monumental +decoration in the world. On the two longer walls, nearly unbroken +lunettes of something over a semicircle, he painted the two great +compositions of Theology and Philosophy known as the "Disputa" and the +"School of Athens." The "Disputa" (Pl. 13), the earlier of the two, has +the more connection with the art of the past. The use of gilded relief +in the upper part recalls the methods of Pintoricchio, and the hint of +the whole arrangement was doubtless taken from those semidomes which +existed in many churches. But what an original idea it was to transform +the flat wall of a room into the apse of a cathedral, and what a +solemnity it imparts to the discussion that is going on! The upper part +is formal in the extreme, as it need be for the treatment of such a +theme, but even here there is variety as well as stateliness in the +attitudes and the spacing. In the lower part the variety becomes almost +infinite, yet there is never a jar--not a line or a fold of drapery that +mars the supreme order of the whole. Besides the uncounted cherubs which +float among the rays of glory or support the cloudy thrones of the +saints and prophets, there are between seventy and eighty figures in +the picture; yet the hosts of heaven and the church on earth seem +gathered about the altar with its sacred wafer--the tiny circle which is +the focus of the great composition and the inevitable goal of all +regards, as it is the central mystery of Catholic dogma. + +[Illustration: Plate 13.--Raphael. The "Disputa." +In the Vatican.] + +Opposite, in the "School of Athens" (Pl. 14), the treatment is different +but equally successful. The hieratic majesty of the "Disputa" was here +unnecessary, but a tranquil and spacious dignity was to be attained, and +it is attained through the use of vertical and horizontal lines--the +lines of stability and repose, while the bounding curve is echoed again +and again in the diminishing arches of the imagined vaulting. The +figures, fewer in number than in the "Disputa" and confined to the lower +half of the composition, are ranged in two long lines across the +picture; but the nearer line is broken in the centre and the two +figures on the steps, serving as connecting-links between the two ranks, +give to the whole something of that semicircular grouping so noticeable +in the companion picture. The bas-reliefs upon the architecture and the +great statues of Apollo and Minerva above them draw the eye upward at +the sides, and this movement is intensified by the arrangement of the +lateral groups of figures. By these means the counter curve to the arch +above, the one fixed necessity, apparently, of the lunette, is +established. It is more evident in the perspective curve of the painted +dome. Cover this line with a bit of paper, or substitute for it a +straight lintel like that seen beyond, and you will be surprised to find +how much of the beauty of the picture has disappeared. The grouping of +the figures themselves, the way they are played about into clumps or +separated to give greater importance, by isolation, to a particular +head, is even more beyond praise than in the "Disputa." The whole design +has but one fault, and that is an afterthought. In the cartoon the +disproportioned bulk of Heraclitus, thrust into the foreground and +writing in an impossible attitude on a desk in impossible perspective, +is not to be found. It is such a blot upon the picture that one cannot +believe that Raphael added it of his own motion; rather it must have +been placed there at the dictation of some meddling cardinal or learned +humanist who, knowing nothing of art, could not see why any vacant space +should not be filled with any figure whose presence seemed to him +historically desirable. One is tempted to suspect even, so clumsy is the +figure and so out of scale with its neighbors, that the master refused +to disfigure his work himself and left the task to one of his +apprentices. If it had been done by one of them, say Giulio Romano, +after the picture was entirely completed and at the time of the +"Incendio del' Borgo," it could not be more out of keeping. + +[Illustration: Plate 14.--Raphael. "The School of Athens." +In the Vatican.] + +Each of these walls has a doorway at one end, and the way in which these +openings are dissimulated and utilized is most ingenious, particularly +in the "Disputa," where the bits of parapet which play an important part +at either side of the composition, one pierced, the other solid, were +suggested solely by the presence of this door. In the end walls the +openings, large windows much higher than the doors, become of such +importance that the whole nature of the problem is changed. It is the +pierced lunette that is to be dealt with, and Raphael has dealt with it +in two entirely different ways. One wall is symmetrical, the window in +the middle, and on that wall he painted the "Parnassus" (Pl. 15), Apollo +and the Muses in the centre with groups of poets a little lower on +either side and other groups filling the spaces to right and left of the +window head. At first sight the design seems less symmetrical and formal +than the others, with a lyrical freedom befitting the subject, but in +reality it is no less perfect in its ponderation. The group of trees +above Apollo and the reclining figures either side of him accent the +centrality of his position. From this point the line of heads rises in +either direction to the figures of Homer and of the Muse whose back is +turned to the spectator, and the perpendicularity of these two figures +carries upward into the arch the vertical lines of the window. From this +point the lateral masses of foliage take up the drooping curve and unite +it to the arch, and this curve is strongly reinforced by the building up +toward either side of the foreground groups and by the disposition of +the arms of Sappho and of the poets immediately behind her, while, to +disguise its formality, it is contradicted by the long line of Sappho's +body, which echoes that of the bearded poet immediately to the right of +the window and gives a sweep to the left to the whole lower part of the +composition. It is the immediate and absolute solution of the problem, +and so small a thing as the scarf of the back-turned Muse plays its +necessary part in it, balancing, as it does, the arm of the Muse who +stands highest on the left and establishing one of a number of +subsidiary garlands that play through and bind together the wonderful +design. + +[Illustration: Plate 15.--Raphael. "Parnassus." +In the Vatican.] + +The window in the opposite wall is to one side of the middle, and here +Raphael meets the new problem with a new solution. He places a separate +picture in each of the unequal rectangles, carries a simulated cornice +across at the level of the window head, and paints, in the segmental +lunette thus left, the so-called "Jurisprudence" (Pl. 16), which +seems to many decorators the most perfect piece of decorative design +that even Raphael ever created--the most perfect piece of design, +therefore, in the world. Its subtlety of spacing, its exquisiteness of +line, its monumental simplicity, rippled through with a melody of +falling curves from end to end, are beyond description--the reader must +study them for himself in the illustration. One thing he might miss were +not his attention called to it--the ingenious way in which the whole +composition is adjusted to a diagonal axis that the asymmetry of the +wall may be minimized. Draw an imaginary straight line from the boss in +the soffit of the arch through the middle of the Janus-head of Prudence. +It will accurately bisect the central group, composed of this figure and +her two attendant genii, will pass through her elevated left knee, the +centre of a system of curves, and the other end of it will strike the +top of the post or mullion that divides the window opening into two +parts. + +[Illustration: Plate 16.--Raphael. "Jurisprudence." +In the Vatican.] + +This single room, the Camera della Segnatura, marks the brief blossoming +time of Raphael's art, an art consummate in science yet full of a +freshness and spontaneity--the dew still upon it--as wonderful as its +learning. The master himself could not duplicate it. He tried for +Venetian warmth of color in the "Mass of Bolsena" (Pl. 17) and +experimented with tricks of illumination in the "Deliverance of Peter" +(Pl. 18), and in these two compositions, struck out new and admirable +ways of filling pierced lunettes. The balancing, in the one, of the +solitary figure of the pope against the compact group of seven +figures--a group that has to be carried up above the curved screen in +order to counteract the importance given to Julius by his isolation and +by the greater mass of his supporting group below--is a triumph of +arrangement; and here, again, it is notable that the bleeding wafer, the +necessary centre of interest, is situated on a straight line drawn +diagonally from the keystone of the arch to the centre of the window +head, and almost exactly half-way between these two points, while the +great curve of the screen leads to it from either side. In the +symmetrically pierced lunette opposite, the distribution of the space +into three distinct but united pictures, the central one seen through +the grating of the prison, is a highly ingenious and, on the whole, an +acceptable variant on previous inventions. But these two are the last of +the Vatican frescoes that show Raphael's infallible instinct as a +composer. He grows tired, exaggerates his mannerisms, gives a greater +and greater share of the work to his pupils. The later Stanze are either +pompous or confused, or both, until we reach the higgledy-piggledy of +the "Burning of the Borgo" or that inextricable tangle, suggestive of +nothing so much as of a dish of macaroni, the "Battle of Constantine," a +picture painted after the master's death, but for which he probably left +something in the way of sketches. + +[Illustration: Plate 17.--Raphael. "The Mass of Bolsena." +In the Vatican.] + +Yet even in what seems this decadence of his talent Raphael only needed +a new problem to revive his admirable powers in their full splendor. In +1514 he painted the "Sibyls" (Pl. 19) of Santa Maria della Pace, in a +frieze-shaped panel cut by a semicircular arch, and the new shape given +him to fill inspired a composition as perfect in itself and as +indisputably the only right one for the place as anything he ever did. +Among his latest works were the pendentives of the Farnesina, with the +story of Cupid and Psyche--works painted and even drawn by his pupils, +coarse in types and heavy in color but altogether astonishing in freedom +and variety of design. The earlier painters covered their vaulting +with ornamental patterns in which spaces were reserved for independent +pictures, like the rectangles of the Stanza della Segnatura. It was a +bold innovation when Michelangelo discarded this system and placed in +the pendentives of the Sistine his colossal figures of the Prophets and +the Sibyls, each on its architectural throne. It was reserved for +Raphael to take a step that no earlier painter could have dreamed of and +to fill these triangular spaces with free groups relieved against a +clear sky which is the continuous background of the whole series. One +may easily think the earlier system more architecturally fitting, but +the skill with which these groups are composed, their perfect +naturalness, their exhaustless variety, the perfection with which they +fill these awkward shapes, as it were inevitably and without effort, is +nothing short of amazing. It is decoration of a festal and informal +order--the decoration of a kind of summer house, fitted for pleasure, +rather than of a stately chamber--but it is decoration the most +consummate, the fitting last word of the greatest master of decorative +design that the world has seen. + +[Illustration: Plate 18.--Raphael. "The Deliverance of Peter." +In the Vatican.] + +It is this master designer that is the real Raphael, and, but for the +element of design always present in the least of his works, the charming +illustrator, the mere "painter of Madonnas," might be allowed to sink +comfortably into artistic oblivion without cause for protest. But there +is another Raphael we could spare less easily, Raphael the +portrait-painter. The great decorators have nearly always been great +portrait-painters as well, although--perhaps because--there is little +resemblance between the manner of feeling and working necessary for +success in the two arts. The decorator, constantly occupied with +relations of line and space which have little to do with imitation, +finds in the submissive attention to external fact necessary to success +in portraiture a source of refreshment and of that renewed contact with +nature which is constantly necessary to art if it is not to become too +arid an abstraction. Certainly it was so with Raphael, and the master of +design has left us a series of portraits comparable only to those of +that other great designer whose fate was to leave little but portraits +behind him, Hans Holbein. Allowing for the necessary variation of type +and costume in their models and for the difference between an Italian +and a northern education, their methods are singularly alike. Raphael +has greater elegance and feeling for style, Holbein a richer color sense +and, above all, a finer craftsmanship, an unapproachable material +perfection. They have the same quiet, intense observation, the same +impeccable accuracy, the same preoccupation with the person before them +and with nothing else--an individuality to be presented with all it +contains, neither more nor less--to be rendered entirely, and without +flattery as without caricature. There have been portrait-painters who +were greater painters, in the more limited sense of the word, than these +two, and there has been at least one painter whose imaginative sympathy +gave an inner life to his portraits absent from theirs, but in the +essential qualities of portraiture, as distinguished from all other +forms of art, perhaps no one else has quite equalled them. One can give +no greater praise to the "Castiglione" or the "Donna Velata" than to say +that they are fit to hang beside the "Georg Gyze" or the "Christina of +Milan"; and at least one portrait by Raphael, the "Tommaso Inghirami," +in the collection of Mrs. Gardner (Pl. 20)--the original of which the +picture in the Pitti Palace is a replica--has a beauty of surface and +of workmanship almost worthy of Holbein himself. + +[Illustration: Plate 19.--Raphael. "The Sibyls." +Santa Maria della Pace, Rome.] + +[Illustration: Plate 20.--Raphael. "Portrait of Tommaso Inghirami." +In the collection of Mrs. Gardner.] + +Raphael's portraits alone, had he done nothing else, would justify a +great reputation, but they form so relatively small a part of his work +that they may almost be neglected in examining his claims to the rank +that used to be assigned him among the world's greatest artists. It is, +after all, his unique mastery of composition that is his chief title to +fame, and his glory must always be in proportion to the estimation in +which that quality is held. It was because composition was to him a +comparatively unimportant part of painting that Velazquez thought little +of Raphael. It is because, for them, composition, as a distinct element +of art, has almost ceased to exist that so many modern painters and +critics decry Raphael altogether. The decorators have always known that +design is the essence of their art, and therefore they have always +appreciated the greatest of designers. That is why Paul Baudry, in the +third quarter of the nineteenth century, idolized Raphael and based his +own art upon that of the great Umbrian. To-day, in our own country, +mural decoration is again becoming a living art, and the desire for the +appropriate decoration of important buildings with monumental works of +painting is more wide-spread, perhaps, than it has been anywhere at any +time since the Italian Renaissance. So surely as the interest in +decorative painting and the knowledge of its true principles become more +widely spread, so surely will the name of Raphael begin to shine again +with something of its ancient splendor. + +But design is something more than the essential quality of mural +decoration--it is the common basis of all the arts, the essential thing +in art itself. Each of the arts has its qualities proper to it alone, +and it may be right to estimate the painter, the sculptor, the +architect, or the musician according to his eminence in those qualities +which are distinctive of his particular art and which separate it most +sharply from the other arts. In that sense we are right to call Frans +Hals a greater painter than Raphael. But if we estimate a man's artistry +by the same standard, whatever the form of art in which it expresses +itself, rating him by his power of co-ordinating and composing notes or +forms or colors into a harmonious and beautiful unity, then must we +place Raphael pretty near where he used to be placed, admitting but a +choice few of the very greatest to any equality with him. If we no +longer call him "the prince of painters" we must call him one of the +greatest artists among those who have practised the art of painting. + + + + + +V + +TWO WAYS OF PAINTING + + +Among the modern paintings in the Metropolitan Museum is a brilliant and +altogether remarkable little picture by John Sargent, entitled "The +Hermit" (Pl. 21). Mr. Sargent is a portrait-painter by vocation, and the +public knows him best as a penetrating and sometimes cruel reader of +human character. He is a mural painter by avocation and capable, on +occasion, of a monumental formality. In this picture, as in the +wonderful collection of watercolors in the Brooklyn Institute of Arts +and Sciences, one fancies one sees the essential John Sargent, working +for himself alone without regard to external demands, and doing what he +really cares most to do. In such work he is a modern of the moderns +and, in the broadest sense of the word, a thorough Impressionist. Not +that he shows himself a disciple of Monet or occupies himself with the +broken touch or the division of tones--his method is as direct as that +of Sorolla and his impressionism is of the same kind--a bending of all +his energies to the vivid realization of the effect of the scene +rendered as one might perceive it in the first flash of vision if one +came upon it unexpectedly. This picture is better than Sorolla--it is +better than almost any one. It is perhaps the most astonishing +realization of the modern ideal, the most accomplished transcript of the +actual appearance of nature, that has yet been produced. It is because +of its great merit, because of its extraordinary success in what it +attempts, that it leads one to the serious consideration of the nature +of the attempt and of the gain and loss involved in the choice that +modern art has made. + +The picture is exactly square--the choice of this form is, of itself, +typically modern in its unexpectedness--and represents a bit of rough +wood interior under intense sunlight. The light is studied for its +brilliancy rather than for its warmth, and if the picture has a fault, +granted the point of view of the painter, it is in a certain coldness of +color; but such conditions of glaring and almost colorless light do +exist in nature. One sees a few straight trunks of some kind of pine or +larch, a network of branches and needles, a tumble of moss-spotted and +lichened rocks, a confusion of floating lights and shadows, and that is +all. The conviction of truth is instantaneous--it is an actual bit of +nature, just as the painter found it. One is there on that ragged +hillside, half dazzled by the moving spots of light, as if set down +there suddenly, with no time to adjust one's vision. Gradually one's +eyes clear and one is aware, first of a haggard human head with tangled +beard and unkempt hair, then of an emaciated body. There is a man in the +wood! And then--did they betray themselves by some slight +movement?--there are a couple of slender antelopes who were but now +invisible and who melt into their surroundings again at the slightest +inattention. It is like a pictorial demonstration of protective coloring +in men and animals. + +[Illustration: Plate 21.--Sargent. "The Hermit." +In the Metropolitan Museum of Art.] + +Now, almost any one can see how superbly all this is rendered. Any one +can marvel at and admire the free and instantaneous handling, the web of +slashing and apparently meaningless brush strokes which, at a given +distance, take their places by a kind of magic and _are_ the things they +represent. But it takes a painter to know how justly it is observed. In +these days no painter, whatever may be his deepest convictions, can +escape the occasional desire to be modern; and most of us have +attempted, at one time or another, the actual study of the human figure +in the open air. We have taken our model into a walled garden or a deep +wood or the rocky ravine of a brook and have set ourselves seriously to +find out what a naked man or woman really looks like in the setting of +outdoor nature. And we have found just what Sargent has painted. The +human figure, as a figure, has ceased to exist. Line and structure and +all that we have most cared for have disappeared. Even the color of +flesh has ceased to count, and the most radiant blond skin of the +fairest woman has become an insignificant pinkish spot no more important +than a stone and not half so important as a flower. Humanity is absorbed +into the landscape. + +Obviously, there are two courses open to the painter. If he is a modern +by feeling and by training, full of curiosity and of the scientific +temper, caring more for the investigation of the aspects of nature and +the rendering of natural light and atmosphere than for the telling of a +story or the construction of a decoration, he will, if he is able +enough, treat his matter much as Sargent has treated it. The figure will +become, for him, only an incident in the landscape. It will be important +only as a thing of another texture and another color, valuable for the +different way in which it receives the light and reflects the sky, just +as rocks and foliage and water and bare earth are valuable. For to the +true Impressionist light and atmosphere are the only realities, and +objects exist only to provide surfaces for the play of light and +atmosphere. He will abandon all attempt at rendering the material and +physical significance of the human form and will still less concern +himself with its spiritual significance. He will gain a great vividness +of illusion, and he may console himself for what he loses with the +reflection that he has expressed the true relation of man to the +universe--that he has expressed either man's insignificance or man's +oneness with nature, according as his temper is pessimistic or +optimistic. + +If, on the other hand, the painter is one to whom the figure as a figure +means much; one to whom line and bulk and modelling are the principal +means of expression, and who cares for the structure and stress of bone +and muscle; if the glow and softness of flesh appeal strongly to him; +above all, if he has the human point of view and thinks of his figures +as people engaged in certain actions, having certain characters, +experiencing certain states of mind and body; then he will give up the +struggle with the truths of aspect that seem so vital to the painter of +the other type and, by a frank use of conventions, will seek to +increase the importance of his figure at the expense of its +surroundings. He will give it firmer lines and clearer edges, will +strengthen its light and shade, will dwell upon its structure or its +movement and expression. He will so compose his landscape as to +subordinate it to his figure and will make its lines echo and accentuate +that figure's action or repose. When he has accomplished his task he +will have painted not man insignificant before nature but man dominating +nature. + +For an example of this way of representing man's relation to the world +about him, let us take Titian's "Saint Jerome" (Pl. 22)--a picture +somewhat similar to Sargent's in subject and in the relative size of the +figure and its surroundings. Titian has here given more importance to +the landscape than was common in his day. He also has meant, as Sargent +has, to make a great deal of the wilderness to which his saint has +retired, and to make his saint a lonely human being in a savage place. +But the saint and his emotion is, after all, what interests Titian most, +and the wildness of nature is valuable to him mainly for its sympathy +with this emotion. He wants to give a single powerful feeling and to +give it with the utmost dramatic force--to give it theatrically even, +one might admit of this particular picture; for it is by no means so +favorable an example of Titian's method, or of the older methods of art +in general, as is Sargent's "Hermit" of the modern way of seeing and +painting. To attain this end he simplifies and arranges everything. He +lowers the pitch of his coloring to a sombre glow and concentrates the +little light upon his kneeling figure. He spends all his knowledge on so +drawing and modelling that figure as to make you feel to the utmost its +bulk and reality and the strain upon its muscles and tendons, and he +so places everything else on his canvas as to intensify its action and +expression. The gaze of the saint is fixed upon a crucifix high on the +right of the picture, and the book behind him, the lines of the rocks, +the masses of the foliage, even the general formation of the ground, are +so disposed as to echo and reinforce the great diagonal. There is a +splendid energy of invention in the drawing of the tree stems, but the +effect is clear and simple with nothing of Sargent's dazzle and +confusion. As for the lion, he is a mere necessary mark of +identification, and Titian has taken no interest in him. + +[Illustration: Plate 22.--Titian. "St. Jerome in the Desert." +In the Brera Gallery, Milan.] + +Now, it is evident that there is not nearly so much literal truth to the +appearance of nature in this picture as in Sargent's. It is not only +that it would never have occurred to Titian to try to paint the +glittering spottiness of sunlight splashing through leafage, or to +attempt to raise his key of light to something like that of nature, at +the cost of fulness of color. It is not merely that he translates and +simplifies and neglects certain truths that the world had not yet +learned to see. He deliberately and intentionally falsifies. He knew as +well as we do that a natural landscape would not arrange itself in such +lines and masses for the purpose of throwing out the figure and of +enhancing its emotion. But to him natural facts were but so much +material, to be treated as he pleased for the carrying out of his +purpose. He was a colorist and a chiaroscurist; and he had a great deal +more interest in light and in landscape than most of the painters of his +time. If he had been pre-eminently a draughtsman, like Michelangelo, he +would have reduced his light and shade to the amount strictly necessary +to give that powerful modelling of the figure which is the draughtsman's +means of expression, would have greatly increased the relative size and +importance of the figure, and would have reduced the landscape to a +barely intelligible symbol. Had he been a linealist, like Botticelli, he +would have eliminated modelling almost altogether, would have +concentrated his attention upon the edges of things, and would have +reduced his picture to a flat pattern in which the beauty and +expressiveness of the lines should be almost the only attraction. + +For all art is an exchange of gain against loss--you cannot have +Sargent's truth of impression and Titian's truth of emotion in the same +picture, nor Michelangelo's beauty of structure with Botticelli's beauty +of line. To be a successful artist is to know what you want and to get +it at any necessary sacrifice, though the greatest artists maintain a +noble balance and sacrifice no more than is necessary. And if a painter +of to-day is like-minded with these older masters he will have to +express himself much in their manner. He will have to make, with his +eyes open, the sacrifices which they made, more or less unconsciously, +and to deny a whole range of truths with which his fellows are occupied +that he may express clearly and forcibly the few truths which he has +chosen. + +All truths are good, and all ways of painting are legitimate that are +necessary to the expression of any truth. I am not here concerned to +show that one way is better than another or one set of truths more +important than another set of truths. For the present I am desirous only +of showing why there is more than one way--of explaining the necessity +of different methods for the expression of different individualities and +different ways of envisaging nature and art. But a little while ago it +was the modern or impressionistic manner that needed explanation. It +was new, it was revolutionary, and it was misunderstood and disliked. A +generation of critics has been busy in explaining it, a generation of +artists has been busy in practising it, and now the balance has turned +the other way. The pressure of conformity is upon the other side, and it +is the older methods that need justification and explanation. The +prejudices of the workers and the writers have gradually and naturally +become the prejudices of at least a part of the public, and it has +become necessary to show that the small minority of artists who still +follow the old roads do so not from ignorance or stupidity or a stolid +conservatism, still less from mere wilful caprice, but from necessity, +because those roads are the only ones that can lead them where they wish +to go. No more magnificent demonstration of the qualities possible to +the purely modern methods of painting has been made than this brilliant +little picture of Sargent's. All the more is it a demonstration of the +qualities impossible to these methods. If such qualities have any +permanent value and interest for the modern world it is a gain for art +that some painters should try to keep alive the methods that render +possible their attainment. + + + + + +VI + +THE AMERICAN SCHOOL + + +In the catalogues of our museums you may find entries like this: "John +Smith, American school; The Empty Jug" or what-not. In such entries +little more than a bare statement of nationality is intended. John Smith +is an American, by birth or adoption; that is all that the statement is +meant to convey. But the question occurs: Have we an American school in +a more specific sense than this? Have we a body of painters with certain +traits in common and certain differences from the painters of other +countries? Has our production in painting sufficient homogeneity and +sufficient national and local accent to entitle it to the name of +American school in the sense in which there is, undoubtedly, a French +school and an English school? + +Under the conditions of to-day there are no longer anywhere such +distinctive local schools as existed in the Renaissance. In Italy, in +those days, there were not only such great schools as the Venetian, the +Florentine, and the Umbrian, differing widely in their point of view, +their manner of seeing, and their technical traditions--each little town +had a school with something characteristic that separated its painters +from those of other schools in the surrounding towns. To-day every one +knows and is influenced by the work of every one else, and it is only +broad national characteristics that still subsist. Modern pictures are +singularly alike, but, on the whole, it is still possible to tell an +English picture from a French one, and a German or Italian picture from +either. We may still speak of a Dutch school or a Spanish school with +some reasonableness. Is it similarly and equally reasonable to speak of +an American school? Does a room full of American pictures have a +different look from a room full of pictures by artists of any other +nationality? Does one feel that the pictures in such a room have a +something in common that makes them kin and a something different that +distinguishes them from the pictures of all other countries? I think the +answer must be in the affirmative. + +We have already passed the stage of mere apprenticeship, and it can no +longer be said that our American painters are mere reflections of their +European masters. Twenty or even ten years ago there may have been some +truth in the accusation. To-day many of our younger painters have had no +foreign training at all, or have had such as has left no specific mark of a +particular master; and from the work of most of our older painters it would +be difficult to guess who their masters were without reference to a +catalogue. They have, through long work in America and under American +conditions, developed styles of their own bearing no discoverable +resemblance to the styles of their first instructors. To take specific +examples, who would imagine from the mural paintings of Blashfield or the +decorations by Mowbray in the University Club of New York that either had +been a pupil of Bonnat? Or who, looking at the exquisite landscapes or +delicate figure pieces of Weir, would find anything to recall the name of +Gerome? Some of the pupils of Carolus Duran are almost the only painters we +have who acquired in their school-days a distinctive method of work which +still marks their production, and even they are hardly distinguishable +to-day from others; for the method of Duran, as modified and exemplified by +John Sargent, has become the method of all the world, and a pupil of Carolus +simply paints in the modern manner, like the rest. Those American painters +who have adopted the impressionist point of view, again, have modified its +technic to suit their own purposes and are at least as different from the +Impressionists of France as are the Impressionists of Scandinavia. We have +painters who are undeniably influenced by Whistler, but so have other +countries--the school of Whistler is international--and, after all, Whistler +was an American. In short, the resemblances between American painting and +the painting of other countries are to-day no greater than the resemblances +between the painting of any two of those countries. And I think the +differences between American painting and that of other countries are quite +as great as, if not greater than, the differences between the paintings of +any two of those countries. + +Another accusation that used to be heard against our painters has been +out-lived. We used to be told, with some truth, that we had learned to +paint but had nothing to say with our painting, that we produced +admirable studies but no pictures. The accusation never was true of our +landscape-painting. Whatever may be the final estimation of the works of +Inness and Wyant, there can be no doubt that they produced +pictures--things conceived and worked out to give one definite and +complete impression; things in which what was presented and what was +eliminated were equally determined by a definite purpose; things in +which accident and the immediate dominance of nature had little or no +part. As for Winslow Homer, whether in landscape or figure painting, his +work was unfailingly pictorial, whatever else it might be. He was a +great and original designer, and every canvas of his was completely and +definitely composed--a quality which at once removes from the category +of mere sketches and studies even his slighter and more rapid +productions. And our landscape-painters of to-day are equally painters +of pictures. Some of them might be thought, by a modern taste, too +conventionally painters of pictures--too much occupied with composition +and tone and other pictorial qualities at the expense of freshness of +observation--while our briskest and most original observers have, many +of them, a power of design and a manner of casting even their freshest +observations into pictorial form that is as admirable as it is +remarkable. + +No one could enter one of our exhibitions without feeling the definitely +pictorial quality of American landscape-painting, but these exhibitions +do less justice to the achievement of our figure-painters. The principal +reason for this is that many of our most serious figure-painters have +been so much occupied with mural decoration that their work seldom +appears in the exhibitions at all, while the work that they have done is +so scattered over our vast country that we rather forget its existence +and, assuredly, have little realization of its amount. It is one of the +defects of our exhibition system that work of this kind, while it is, of +course, on permanent exhibition in the place for which it is painted, is +hardly ever "exhibited," in the ordinary sense, in the centres where it +is produced. The regular visitor to the Paris salons might know almost +all that has been done in France in the way of mural painting. The +public of our American exhibitions knows only vaguely and by hearsay +what our mural painters have done and are doing. It is true that such +work is infinitely better seen in place, but it is a pity it cannot be +seen, even imperfectly, by the people who attend our exhibitions--people +who can rarely have the necessary knowledge to read such collections of +sketches, studies, and photographs as are shown at the exhibitions of +the Architectural League, where, alone, our mural painters can show +anything. If it were seen it would surely alter the estimation in which +American figure-painting is held. Such work as was done by the late John +La Farge, such work as is being done by Blashfield and Mowbray and +Simmons and a dozen others, if not, in the most limited sense of the +word, pictorial, is even further removed from the mere sketch or +study--the mere bit of good painting--than is the finest easel picture. + +But it is not only in mural decoration that serious figure-painting is +being done in this country. I do not see how any one can deny the name +of pictures to the genre paintings of Mr. Tarbell and Mr. Paxton unless +he is prepared to deny pictorial quality to the whole Dutch school of +the seventeenth century; and the example of these men is influencing a +number of others toward the production of thoroughly thought-out and +executed genre pictures. We have long had such serious figure-painters +as Thayer and Brush, Dewing and Weir. The late Louis Loeb was attempting +figure subjects of a very elaborate sort. To-day every exhibition shows +an increasing number of worthy efforts at figure-painting in either the +naturalistic or the ideal vein. We have pictures with subjects +intelligently chosen and intelligibly treated, pictures with a pattern +and a clear arrangement of line and mass, pictures soundly drawn and +harmoniously colored as well as admirably painted. + +The painters of America are no longer followers of foreign masters or +students learning technic and indifferent to anything else. They are a +school producing work differing in character from that of other schools +and at least equal in quality to that of any school existing to-day. + +If so much may be taken as proved, the question remains for +consideration: What are the characteristics of the American school of +painting? Its most striking characteristic is one that may be considered +a fault or a virtue according to the point of view and the +prepossessions of the observer. It is a characteristic that has +certainly been a cause of the relatively small success of American work +at recent international exhibitions. The American school is, among the +schools of to-day, singularly old-fashioned. This characteristic has, +undoubtedly, puzzled and repelled the foreigner. It is a time when the +madness for novelty seems to be carrying everything before it, when +anything may be accepted so long as it is or seems new, when the effort +of all artists is to get rid of conventions and to shake off the +"shackles of tradition." Here is a new people in the blessed state of +having no traditions to shake off and from whom, therefore, some peppery +wildness might be expected for the tickling of jaded palates. Behold, +they are sturdily setting themselves to recover for art the things the +others have thrown away! They are trying to revive the old fashion of +thoughtful composition, the old fashion of good drawing, the old fashion +of lovely color, and the old fashion of sound and beautiful workmanship. + +This conservatism of American painting, however, is not of the kind that +still marks so much of the painting of England. Excepting exceptions, +English painting is somewhat stolidly staying where it was. America's +conservatism is ardent, determined, living. It is not standing still; +it is going somewhere as rapidly as possible--it might, perhaps, be more +truly called not conservatism but reaction. We have, of course, our +ultramodernists, but their audacities are mild compared to those of the +French or German models they imitate. We have, even more of course, the +followers of the easiest way--the practitioners of current and accepted +methods who are alike everywhere. But our most original and most +distinguished painters, those who give the tone to our exhibitions and +the national accent to our school, are almost all engaged in trying to +get back one or another of the qualities that marked the great art of +the past. They have gone back of the art of the day and are retying the +knots that should bind together the art of all ages. + +This tendency shows itself strongly even in those whose work seems, at +first sight, most purely naturalistic or impressionistic. Among those +of our painters who have adopted and retained the impressionist technic, +with its hatching of broken colors, the two most notable are Mr. Hassam +and Mr. Weir. But Mr. Hassam, at his best, is a designer with a sense of +balance and of classic grace almost equal to that of Corot, and he often +uses the impressionist method to express otherwise the delicate shimmer +of thin foliage that Corot loved. Nay, so little is he a pure +naturalist, he cannot resist letting the white sides of naked nymphs +gleam among his tree trunks--he cannot refrain from the artist's +immemorial dream of Arcady. As for Mr. Weir, surely nothing could be +more unlike the instantaneousness of true impressionism than his +long-brooded-over, subtle-toned, infinitely sensitive art. + +There is little dreaminess in the work of Mr. Tarbell and the growing +number of his followers. Theirs is almost a pure naturalism, a "making +it like." Yet, notably in the work of Mr. Tarbell himself, and to some +extent in that of the others, there is an elegance of arrangement, a +thoroughness in the notation of gradations of light, a beauty and a +charm that were learned of no modern. Their art is an effort to bring +back the artistic quality of the most artistic naturalism ever +practised, that of Vermeer of Delft. + +Others of our artists are going still further back in the history of art +for a part of their inspiration. Mr. Brush has always been a linealist +and a student of form, but his earlier canvases, admirable as they were, +were those of a docile pupil of Gerome applying the thoroughness of +Gerome's method to a new range of subjects and painting the American +Indian as Gerome had painted the modern Egyptian. In recent years each +new picture of his has shown more clearly the influence of the early +Italians--each has been more nearly a symphony of pure line. + +Even in purely technical matters our painters have been experimenting +backward, trying to recover lost technical beauties. The last pictures +of Louis Loeb were underpainted throughout in monochrome, the final +colors being applied in glazes and rubbings, and to-day a number of +others, landscape and figure painters, are attempting to restore and +master this, the pure Venetian method, while still others, among them +Emil Carlsen, are reviving the use of tempera. + +But it is in our mural painting even more than elsewhere that the +conservative or reactionary tendency of American painting is most +clearly marked. John La Farge was always himself, but when the general +movement in mural painting began in this country with the Chicago +World's Fair and the subsequent decoration of the Library of Congress, +the rest of us were much under the influence of Puvis de Chavannes. Even +then the design was not his, but was founded on earlier examples of +decorative composition, but his pale tones were everywhere. Little by +little the study of the past has taught us better. American mural +painting has grown steadily more monumental in design, and at the same +time it has grown richer and fuller in color. To-day, while it is not +less but more personal and original than it was, it has more kinship +with the noble achievements of Raphael and Veronese than has any other +modern work extant. + +And this brings us to the second characteristic of the American school +of painting: it is rapidly becoming a school of color. We have still +plenty of painters who work in the blackish or chalky or muddy and +opaque tones of modern art, but I think we have more men who produce +rich and powerful color and more men who produce subtle and delicate +color than any other modern school. The experiments in reviving old +technical methods have been undertaken for the sake of purity and +luminosity of color and have largely succeeded. The pictures of Mr. +Tarbell are far more colored than those of the European painter whose +work is, in some ways, most analogous to his, M. Joseph Bail. Mr. +Hassam's color is always sparkling and brilliant, Mr. Dewing's delicate +and charming, Mr. Weir's subtle and harmonious and sometimes very full. +Even Mr. Brush's linear arrangements are clothed in sombre but often +richly harmonious tones, and the decorative use of powerful color is the +main reliance of such painters as Hugo Ballin. But the note of color +runs through the school and one hardly needs to name individual men. +Whether our landscapists glaze and scumble with the tonalists, or use +some modification of the impressionist hatching, it is for the sake of +color; and even our most forthright and dashing wielders of the big +brush often achieve a surprising power of resonant coloring. + +Power, fulness, and beauty of coloring are hardly modern qualities. Much +as impressionism has been praised for restoring color to a colorless +art, its result has been, too often, to substitute whitishness for +blackishness. Color has characterized no modern painting since that of +Delacroix and Millet as it characterizes much of the best American +painting. The love for and the success in color of our school is, after +all, a part of its conservatism. + +It may seem an odd way of praising a modern school to call it the least +modern of any. It _would_ be an odd way of praising that school if its +lack of modernness were a mere matter of lagging behind or of standing +still and marking time. But if the "march of progress" has been +down-hill--if the path that is trod leads into a swamp or over a +precipice--then there may be most hopefulness for those who can 'bout +face and march the other way. I have, elsewhere in this volume, given at +some length some of my reasons for thinking that modern art has been +following a false route and is in danger of perishing in the bog or +falling over the cliff. If it is so we may congratulate ourselves that +those of our painters who are still following the rest of the world have +not so nearly reached the end of the road, and that those who are more +independent have discovered in time what that end is and have turned +back. + +It is because it is least that of to-day that I believe our art may be +that of to-morrow--it is because it is, of all art now going, that which +has most connection with the past that I hope the art of America may +prove to be the art of the future. + + + + + +VII + +AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS[C] + +[C] Address delivered before the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences on +February 22, 1908. Now revised and enlarged. + + +Augustus Saint-Gaudens was born in Dublin, Ireland, on the first day of +March, 1848, but was brought to America at the age of six months. His +childhood and youth were passed in the city of New York, as was a great +part of his working life; and though his origin was foreign, lifelong +associations had stamped him indelibly an American. The greater part of +his work was done in America; almost all of it was done for America; and +I do not think it is fancy that sees in his art the expression of a +distinctively American spirit. Yet from his mixed French and Irish +blood he may well have derived that mingling of the Latin sense of form +with a Celtic depth of sentiment which was so markedly characteristic of +his genius. + +His father, Bernard Paul Ernest Saint-Gaudens, was a shoemaker from the +little town of Aspet in Haute-Garonne, only a few miles from the town of +Saint-Gaudens, from which the family must have drawn its origin and its +name. His mother was Mary McGuinness, a native of Dublin. Augustus +Saint-Gaudens was one of several children born to this couple and not +the only artist among them, for his younger brother Louis also attained +some reputation as a sculptor, though his entire lack of ambition +prevented his achieving all that was expected of him by those who knew +his delicate talent. The boy Augustus attended the public schools of New +York and received there all the formal education he ever had; but at +thirteen it was necessary for him to face the problem of earning his +living. His artistic proclivities were probably already well marked, and +to give them some scope, while assuring him a regular trade at which +money could be earned, he was apprenticed in the good old way to a cameo +cutter named Louis Avet, said to be the first man to cut stone cameos in +the United States. Thus it came about that the greatest of American +sculptors had much such a practical apprenticeship as a Florentine of +the fifteenth century might have had. He himself always spoke of it as +"one of the most fortunate things that ever happened to him" and +attributed much of his success to the habit of faithful labor acquired +at this time. Probably, also, the habit of thinking in terms of relief, +fostered by years of work at this ancient art, was not without influence +in the moulding of his talent. + +His relations with Avet lasted from 1861 to 1864, when his master +quarrelled with him and abruptly dismissed him from his shop. The boy +was already a determined person; he believed that he had suffered an +injustice, and, though Avet went to his parents and tried to induce them +to send him back, he refused to return. A new master was found for him +in the person of a shell-cameo cutter named Jules LeBrethon, and with +him Saint-Gaudens remained three years. During his six years' +apprenticeship under his two masters the youth showed already that +energy and power of will that made him what he was. He meant to be +something more than an artisan, and he spent his evenings in the +classes, first of the Cooper Union, afterward of the National Academy of +Design, in the hard study of drawing, the true foundation of all the +fine arts. It was one of the elements of his superiority in his +profession that he could draw as few sculptors can, and he always felt +that he owed an especial debt to the Cooper Union, which he was glad to +repay when he modelled the statue of its venerable founder. Of the other +institution by whose freely given instruction he had profited, the +National Academy of Design, he became one of the most honored members. +By 1867, when he was nineteen years old, he had saved a little money and +was master of a trade that could be relied on to bring in more, and he +determined to go to Paris and begin the serious study of sculpture. He +worked, for a time, at the Petite Ecole, and entered the studio of +Jouffroy in the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in 1868, remaining until 1870. +During this time, and afterward, he was self-supporting, working half +his time at cameo cutting until his efforts at sculpture on a larger +scale began to bring in an income. + +When the Franco-Prussian War broke out Paris ceased to be a place for +the carrying on of the serious study of art, and Saint-Gaudens went to +Rome, where his associates were the French prizemen of the day, of whom +Mercie was one. He remained there until 1874, except for a visit to New +York in the winter of 1872-3 for the purpose of modelling a bust of +Senator Evarts, and one or two other busts, which were put into marble +upon his return to Rome. In those Roman days he executed his first +statue, a "Hiawatha," one of his few studies of the nude, and a +"Silence," a not very characteristic draped figure which yet fills with +some impressiveness her niche at the head of the grand stairway of the +Masonic Temple on Twenty-fourth Street. + +From 1875 to 1877 he had a studio in New York, where he seems to have +executed some of his earliest portrait reliefs. During these years he +came into contact with La Farge, for whom he turned painter and aided +in the execution of the decorations of Trinity Church in Boston. It was +at this time, also, that he received his first commissions for important +public work, those for the Farragut statue in Madison Square, the +Randall at Sailors' Snug Harbor, and the angels for Saint Thomas's +Church. He had married Augusta F. Homer in 1877, and in that year, +taking his bride and his commissions with him, he returned to Paris, +feeling, as many another young Paris-bred artist has felt, that there +only could such important works be properly carried out. The "Farragut" +was completed and exhibited in the plaster at the Salon of 1880, and +from that time his success was assured. For the rest of his life he was +constantly busy, receiving almost more commissions for work of +importance than it was possible for him to carry out. He returned to New +York in 1880, and in 1881 he opened the studio in Thirty-sixth Street, +where he remained for sixteen years and where so many of his greatest +works were executed. From that studio came many of his exquisite +portraits in relief, his caryatids and angelic figures, such as those +for the Morgan tomb, so unfortunately destroyed by fire in 1882 (a fate +since shared by the earlier angels of Saint Thomas's), the great statues +of Lincoln and Chapin, the "Shaw Memorial," and the "Adams Memorial"; +and in it was done all the preliminary work of the great equestrian +monument to General Sherman. + +It is in these years of his prime that he will ever be most fondly +remembered by those--and they are many--who had the privilege of his +friendship. Admittedly our foremost sculptor, and one of the founders of +the Society of American Artists, he became at once a person of +importance in the world of art; and as his brilliant career developed +he established intimate relationships with an ever-widening circle of +men in every walk of life, while no one who ever knew him well can have +felt anything but an abiding affection for him. That long, white studio +became a familiar meeting-place for all who were interested in any form +of art; and the Sunday afternoon concerts that were held there for many +years will be looked back to with regret as long as any of their +auditors remain alive. + +This studio was given up when Saint-Gaudens went abroad for the third +time, in 1897, to execute the Sherman group, and he never resumed his +residence in New York. In 1885 he had purchased a property at Cornish, +N.H., just across the Connecticut River from Windsor, Vt., and when he +returned to this country in 1900, covered with fresh honors but an ill +man, he made what had been a summer home his permanent abode. He named +it Aspet, after his father's birthplace, and there he erected two +studios and finished his Sherman statue. In these studios were executed +the second "Lincoln," the Parnell statue for Dublin, and much other +work. The larger studio was burned in 1904, but was rebuilt and the lost +work re-begun and carried to a conclusion. What can never be quite +replaced were two portraits of himself. A study, of the head only, in +the collection of the National Academy of Design and a sketch by Will H. +Low, painted in Paris in 1877, are now the only existing portraits of +him done from life in his best years. The Metropolitan Museum possesses +a portrait of him in his last years, by Miss Ellen Emmet, and a replica, +painted since his death, of my own earlier portrait. + +From the illness he brought back from Paris in 1900 Saint-Gaudens never +recovered. At times he showed something of his old vigor and was able +not only to do fine work but to indulge more in out-of-door sports than +he had ever done in his youth, while a growing love for nature and for +literature made his life fuller, in some respects, than in the days when +his own art more entirely absorbed him. But year by year his strength +grew less and his intervals of freedom from pain grew shorter, and he +was more and more forced to rely upon the corps of able and devoted +assistants which he gathered about him. He developed to an extraordinary +extent the faculty of communicating his ideas and desires to others and +of producing through their hands work essentially his own and of a +quality entirely beyond their ability; but it was at the cost of a +strain upon brain and nerve almost infinitely greater than would have +been involved in work done with his own hand. In the summer of 1906 he +broke down utterly, the work of his studio was interrupted, and he +ceased to see even his most intimate friends. He rallied somewhat from +this attack, and began again his heroic struggle against fate, directing +the work of assistants while himself so weak that he had to be carried +from the house to the studio. The end came on the evening of August 3, +1907. He died as he had lived, a member of no church, but a man of pure +and lofty character. As he had wished, his body was cremated, and his +ashes were temporarily deposited in the cemetery at Windsor, Vt., across +the river from his home. An informal funeral service was held in his +private studio on August 7, attended by friends and neighbors and by a +few old friends from a distance; but the gathering could include but a +few of the many who felt his death as a personal loss. + +The merits of Saint-Gaudens's work were fully recognized in his +lifetime. He was an officer of the Legion of Honor, a Corresponding +Member of the Institute of France, a member of half a dozen academies, +and the bearer of honorary degrees from the universities of Harvard, +Yale, and Princeton. But of all the honors he received there were two, +one of a public, the other of a private nature, which he himself valued +most highly: the one as showing the estimation in which his art was held +by his fellow artists, the other as an evidence of the personal +affection felt for him by his friends. At the Pan-American Exposition in +1901, upon the unanimous recommendation of the Jury of Fine Arts, +composed of painters, sculptors, and architects, he was awarded a +special diploma and medal of honor, "apart from and above all other +awards," an entirely exceptional honor, which marked him as the first of +American artists, as previously received honors had marked him one of +the greatest sculptors of his time. On June 23, 1905, the artistic and +literary colony which had gradually grown up about his home in Cornish +celebrated the twentieth anniversary of his coming there by a fete and +open-air masque held in the groves of Aspet. The beauty of this +spectacle has become almost legendary. The altar with its columned +canopy, which served for a background to the play, still stands, or +recently stood, though much dilapidated by weather, as it was +immortalized by the sculptor himself in a commemorative plaquette (Pl. +23) which is among the most charming of his minor works. He planned if +he had lived to perpetuate it in enduring marble, and this task has now +been taken up by his wife, who means to dedicate the monument as a +fitting memorial to a great artist and a noble man in the place he loved +as his chosen home. + +Some part of the vivid and lovable personality of Augustus +Saint-Gaudens must have been visible, almost at a glance, to any one who +ever came in contact with him--to any one, even, who ever saw his +portrait. In his spare but strong-knit figure, his firm but supple +hands, his manner of carrying himself, his every gesture, one felt the +abounding vitality, the almost furious energy of the man. That +extraordinary head, with its heavy brow beetling above the small but +piercing eyes, its red beard and crisp, wiry hair, its projecting jaw +and great, strongly modelled nose, was alive with power--with power of +intellect no less than of will. His lack of early education gave him a +certain diffidence and a distrust of his own gifts of expression. He was +apt to overrate the mere verbal facility of others and to underestimate +himself in the comparison--indeed, a certain humility was strongly +marked in him, even as regards his art, though he was self-confident +also. When he was unconstrained his great powers of observation, his +shrewdness of judgment, his bubbling humor, and a picturesque vivacity +of phrase not uncommon among artists made him one of the most entrancing +of talkers. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 23.--Saint-Gaudens. "Plaquette Commemorating Cornish Masque."] + +Underneath his humor and his gayety, however, there lay a deep-seated +Celtic melancholy, and beside his energy was an infinite patience at the +service of an exacting artistic conscience. The endless painstaking of +his work and the time he took over it were almost proverbial. He was +twelve years engaged upon the "Shaw Memorial" and eleven upon the +"Sherman," and, though he did much other work while these were in +progress, yet it was his constant revision, his ever-renewed striving +for perfection that kept them so long achieving. The "Diana" of the +Madison Square Garden was taken down from her tower because he and the +architect, Stanford White, thought her too large, and was entirely +remodelled on a smaller scale. And with this patience went a gentleness, +a sweetness, a delicate sensitiveness, and an abounding humanity and +sympathy. He could be almost ruthless in the assertion of his will when +the interests of his art or of justice seemed to demand it, yet there +was a tender-heartedness in him which made it distressing to him to +inflict pain on any one. The conflict of these elements in his nature +sometimes made his actions seem inconsistent and indecipherable even to +those who knew him. He would be long-suffering, compromising, +disinclined to strike; but when he was at last roused the blow would be +as staggering as it was unexpected. It was as if he struck the harder to +have done with it and to spare himself the pain of striking again. + +It was his whole-hearted devotion to his art which caused his rare acts +of self-assertion, and it was this same devotion, no less than his +natural kindliness, that made him ever helpful to younger artists who +showed any promise of future worth. Even in his last days of unspeakable +suffering he would summon what was left of his old strength to give a +word of criticism and advice, above all, a word of commendation, to any +one who needed the one or had earned the other. The essential goodness +of the man was most felt by those who stood nearest him, and most of +all, perhaps, by his actual coworkers. He could command, as few have +been able to do, the love and devotion of his assistants. To all who +knew him the man himself seemed finer, rarer, sweeter than his work, and +the gap he has left in their lives will be even more impossible to fill +than his place in American art. + +But the personality of an artist, though he be a great one, is for the +memory of his private friends. It is only as it colors his art that it +is of public interest. It is his art itself, his gift to the world, that +the world cares for; it is of the kind and quality of that art, the +nature and the degree of its greatness, that the world wishes to hear. +Because the man was my friend I have wished to give some glimpse of the +manner of man he was; because the artist was the greatest our country +has produced I am to try to give some idea of his art, of the elements +of its strength, and of the limitations which are as necessary as its +qualities. + +The time of Saint-Gaudens's study in Paris was a time of great +importance in the development of modern sculpture, and, although +Jouffroy was not himself a sculptor of the highest rank, his studio was +a centre for what was then the new movement in the sculpture of France. +The essential thing in this movement was the abandoning of the formal +imitation of second-rate antiques and the substitution of the sculpture +of the Italian Renaissance as a source of inspiration and of the direct +study of nature as a means of self-expression. There had always been +individual sculptors of power and originality in France, but the +movement of the French school of sculpture, as a whole, away from the +pseudo classicism which had long dominated it was really inaugurated by +Paul Dubois only a few years before Saint-Gaudens's arrival in Paris. +Many of the men destined to a brilliant part in the history of modern +sculpture were trained in the _atelier_ of Jouffroy. Falguiere and +Saint-Marceau had but just left that studio when the young American +entered it, and Mercie was his fellow student there. Dalou and Rodin +have since made these men seem old-fashioned and academic, but they +were then, and for many years afterward, the heads of the new school; +and of this new school, so different from anything he had known in +America, Saint-Gaudens inevitably became a part. His own pronounced +individuality, and perhaps his comparative isolation during the years of +his greatest productivity, gave his art a character of its own, unlike +any other, but to the French school of sculpture of the third quarter of +the nineteenth century he essentially belonged. + +Of course, his style was not formed in a moment. His "Hiawatha" seems, +to-day, much such a piece of neo-classicism as was being produced by +other men in the Rome of that time, and the "Silence," though somewhat +more modern in accent, is an academic work such as might have been +expected from a docile pupil of his master. The relief of angels for the +reredos of Saint Thomas's Church is the earliest important work which +shows his personal manner. It was undertaken in collaboration with John +La Farge, and perhaps the influence of La Farge, and of that eminently +picturesque genius Stanford White, mingled with that of the younger +French school in forming its decorative and almost pictorial character. +It was a kind of improvisation, done at prodigious speed and without +study from nature--a sketch rather than a completed work of art, but a +sketch to be slowly developed into the reliefs of the Farragut pedestal, +the angels of the Morgan tomb, the caryatids of the Vanderbilt +mantelpiece, and, at length, into such a masterpiece as the +"Amor-Caritas." In each of these developments the work becomes less +picturesque and more formal, the taste is purified, the exuberance of +decorative feeling is more restrained. The final term is reached in the +caryatids for the Albright Gallery at Buffalo--works of his last days, +when his hands were no longer able to shape the clay, yet essentially +his though he never touched them; works of an almost austere nobility of +style, the most grandly monumental figures he ever produced. + +The commonest criticism on Saint-Gaudens's art has been that it is not, +primarily, sculptural in its inspiration; and, in a sense, the criticism +is justified. One need not, perhaps, greatly care whether it is true or +not. It is, after all, only a matter of definition, and if we were +forbidden to call his work sculpture at all and required to find another +name for it, the important fact that it is art--art of the finest, the +most exquisite, at times the most powerful--would in no wise be altered. +Ghiberti went beyond the traditions of sculpture in relief, introduced +perspective into his compositions, modelled trees and rocks and clouds +and cast them in bronze, made pictures, if you like, instead of reliefs. +Does any one care? Is it not enough that they are beautiful pictures? +The gates of the Baptistry of Florence are still worthy, as the greatest +sculptor since the Greeks thought them, to be the gates of paradise. A +work of art remains a work of art, call it what you please, and a thing +of beauty will be a joy forever, whether or not you can pigeonhole it in +some ready-made category. After all, the critical pigeonholes are made +for the things, not the things for the pigeonholes. The work is there, +and if it does not fit your preconceived definition the fault is as +likely to be in the definition as in the work itself. + +And the first and most essential thing to note about the art of Augustus +Saint-Gaudens is that it is always art of the purest--free in an +extraordinary degree from the besetting sins of naturalism and the +scientific temper on the one hand and of the display of cleverness and +technical brilliancy on the other. Never more than in our own day have +these been the great temptations of an able artist: that he should in +the absorption of study forget the end in the means and produce +demonstrations of anatomy or of the laws of light rather than statues or +pictures; or that he should, in the joy of exercising great talents, +seem to say, "See how well I can do it!" and invent difficulties for the +sake of triumphantly resolving them, becoming a virtuoso rather than a +creator. Of the meaner temptation of mere sensationalism--the desire to +attract attention by ugliness and eccentricity lest one should be unable +to secure it by truth and beauty--one need not speak. It is the +temptation of vulgar souls. But great and true artists have yielded, +occasionally or habitually, to these other two; Saint-Gaudens never +does. I know no work of his to which raw nature has been admitted, in +which a piece of study has been allowed to remain as such without the +moulding touch of art to subdue it to its place; and I know only one +which has any spice of bravura--the Logan statue--and the bravura is +there because the subject seemed to demand it, not because the artist +wished it. The dash and glitter are those of "Black Jack Logan," not of +Saint-Gaudens. The sculptor strove to render them as he strove to render +higher qualities at other times, but they remain antipathetic to his +nature, and the statue is one of the least satisfactory of his works. He +is essentially the artist--the artificer of beauty--ever bent on the +making of a lovely and significant thing; and the study of nature and +the resources of his craft are but tools and are never allowed to become +anything more. + +If, then, the accusation that Saint-Gaudens's art is not sculptural +means that he was a designer rather than a modeller, that he cared for +composition more than for representation, that the ensemble interested +him more than the details, I would cheerfully admit that the accusation +is well founded. Such marvels of rendering as Rodin could give us, +before he lost himself in the effort to deserve that reputation as a +profound thinker which has been thrust upon him, were not for +Saint-Gaudens. The modelling of the _morceau_ was not particularly his +affair. The discrimination of hard and soft, of bone and muscle and +integument, the expression of tension where a fleshy tissue is tightly +drawn over the framework beneath, or of weight where it falls away from +it--these were not the things that most compelled his interest or in +which he was most successful. For the human figure as a figure, for the +inherent beauty of its marvellous mechanism, he did not greatly care. +The problems of bulk and mass and weight and movement which have +occupied sculptors from the beginning were not especially his problems. +It may have been due to the nature of the commissions he received that, +after the "Hiawatha" of his student days, he modelled no nude except the +"Diana" of the tower--a purely decorative figure, designed for distant +effect, in which structural modelling would have been out of place +because invisible. But it was not accident that in such draped figures +as the "Amor-Caritas" (Pl. 24) or the caryatids of the Vanderbilt +mantelpiece there is little effort to make the figure visible beneath +the draperies. In the hands of a master of the figure--of one of those +artists to whom the expressiveness and the beauty of the human structure +is all in all--drapery is a means of rendering the masses and the +movement of the figure more apparent than they would be in the nude. In +such works as these it is a thing beautiful in itself, for its own +ripple and flow and ordered intricacy. The figure is there beneath +the drapery, but the drapery is expressive of the mood of the artist and +of the sentiment of the work rather than especially explanatory of the +figure. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 24.--Saint-Gaudens. "Amor Caritas."] + +First of all, by nature and by training, Saint-Gaudens was a designer, +and exquisiteness of design was the quality he most consciously strove +for--the quality on which he expended his unresting, unending, +persevering toil. From the start one feels that design is his principal +preoccupation, that he is thinking mainly of the pattern of the whole, +its decorative effect and play of line, its beauty of masses and spaces, +its fitness for its place and its surroundings; in a word, its +composition. In the beginning, as a workman in the shop of the cameo +cutter, he was concerned with a kind of art in which perfection of +composition is almost the sole claim to serious consideration. Then he +produces a multiplicity of small reliefs, dainty, exquisite, infallibly +charming in their arrangement--things which are so dependent on design +for their very existence that they seem scarcely modelled at all. He +goes on to decorative figures in the round, to heroic statues, to +monumental groups, but always it is design that he thinks of first and +last--design, now, in three dimensions rather than in two--design +properly sculptural rather than pictorial, in so much as it deals with +bosses and concaves, with solid matter in space--but still design. This +power of design rises to higher uses as time goes on, is bent to the +interpretation of lofty themes and the expression of deep emotions, but +it is in its nature the same power that produced the delicate, ethereal +beauty of the reliefs. The infinite fastidiousness of a master designer, +constantly reworking and readjusting his design, that every part shall +be perfect and that no fold or spray of leafage shall be out of its +proper place, never satisfied that his composition is beyond improvement +while an experiment remains untried--this is what cost him years of +labor. His first important statue, the "Farragut," is a masterpiece of +restrained and elegant yet original and forceful design--a design, too, +that includes the pedestal and the bench below, and of which the figures +in bas-relief are almost as important a part as the statue itself. In +later and maturer work, with a more clarified taste and a deeper +feeling, he can reach such unsurpassable expressiveness of composition +as is shown in the "Shaw Memorial" or the great equestrian statue of +Sherman. + +Saint-Gaudens's mastery of low relief was primarily a matter of this +power of design, but it was conditioned also upon two other qualities: +knowledge of drawing and extreme sensitiveness to delicate modulation of +surface. And by drawing I mean not merely knowledge of form and +proportion and the exact rendering of these, in which sense a statue may +be said to be well drawn if its measurements are correct--I mean that +much more subtle and difficult art, the rendering in two dimensions only +of the appearance of objects of three dimensions. Sculpture in the round +is the simplest and, in a sense, the easiest of the arts. It deals with +actual form--a piece of sculpture does not merely look like the form of +an object, it _is_ the form of an object. Leaving out of the count, for +the moment, the refinements and the illusions which may be added to +it--which must be added to it to make it art--it is the reproduction in +another material of the actual forms of things. Something which shall +answer for it, to the uninitiate, may be produced by merely casting +natural objects; and there is a great deal that is called sculpture +which scarcely aims at anything more than the production, by a more +difficult method, of something like a plaster cast from nature. It is +the very simplicity of the art that makes its difficulty, for to avoid +the look of casting and achieve the feeling of art requires the most +delicate handling and the most powerful inspiration, and there is need +in the art of sculpture for the rarest qualities of the greatest minds. +The art of drawing is entirely different. It is all illusion, it deals +only in appearances. Its aim is to depict on a flat surface the aspect +of objects supposed to stand behind it and to be seen through it, and +its means are two branches of the science of optics. It is based on the +study of perspective and on the study of the way light falls upon +objects and reveals their shapes and the direction of their surfaces by +the varying degrees of their illumination. Of this art a sculptor in the +round need not necessarily know anything, and, in fact, many of them, +unfortunately, know altogether too little of it. The maker of a statue +need not think about foreshortenings: if he gives the correct form the +foreshortening will take care of itself. Sometimes it does so in a +disastrous manner! Theoretically he need not worry over light and shade, +although of course he does, in practice, think about it and rely upon +it, more or less. If he gives the true forms they will necessarily have +the true light and shade. But low relief, standing between sculpture and +drawing, is really more closely related to drawing than to sculpture--is +really a kind of drawing--and this is why so few sculptors succeed in +it. + +It is a kind of drawing but an exceedingly difficult kind--the most +delicate and difficult of any of the arts that deal with form alone. As +to the contour, it stands on the same ground with drawing in any other +material. The linear part of it requires exactly the same degree and +the same kind of talent as linear design with a pen or with a burin. But +for all that stands within the contour, for the suggestion of interior +forms and the illusion of solidity, it depends on means of the utmost +subtlety. It exists, as all drawing does, by light and shade, but the +shadows are not produced by the mere darkening of the surface--they are +produced by projections and recessions, by the inclination of the planes +away from or toward the light. The lower the relief the more subtle and +tender must be the variation of the surface which produces them, and +therefore success in relief is one of the best attainable measures of a +sculptor's fineness of touch and perfection of craftsmanship. But as the +light and shade is produced by actual forms which are yet quite unlike +the true forms of nature, it follows that the artist in relief can never +imitate either the shape or the depth of the shadow he sees in nature. +His art becomes one of suggestions and equivalents--an art which can +give neither the literal truth of form nor the literal truth of +aspect--an art at the farthest remove from direct representation. And +success in it becomes, therefore, one of the best tests of a sculptor's +artistry--of his ability to produce essential beauty by the treatment of +his material, rather than to imitate successfully external fact. + +As the degree of relief varies, also, from the lowest possible to that +highest relief which, nearly approaches sculpture in the round, the +problems involved constantly vary. At each stage there is a new +compromise to be made, a new adjustment to find, between fact and +illusion, between the real form and the desired appearance. And there +may be a number of different degrees of relief in the same work, even in +different parts of the same figure, so that the art of relief becomes +one of the most complicated and difficult of arts. It has not, indeed, +the added complication of color, but neither has it the resources of +color, success in which will more or less compensate for failure +elsewhere. There is no permissible failure in bas-relief, any more than +in sculpture in the round, and its difficulties are far greater. Nothing +but truest feeling, completest knowledge, consummate skill will serve. + +This explanation may give some measure of what I mean when I say that I +believe Augustus Saint-Gaudens the most complete master of relief since +the fifteenth century. + +He has produced a series of works which run through the whole range of +the art, from lowest relief to highest; from things of which the relief +is so infinitesimal that they seem as if dreamed into existence rather +than wrought in bronze or marble to things which are virtually engaged +statues; from things which you fear a chance touch might brush away, +like a pastel of Whistler's, to things as solid and enduring in +appearance as in actual material. And in all these things there is the +same inevitable mastery of design and of drawing, the same infinite +resource and the same technical perfection. The "Butler Children" (Pl. +25), the "Schiff Children," the "Sarah Redwood Lee" (Pl. 26), to name +but a few of his masterpieces of this kind, are in their perfection of +spacing, their grace of line, their exquisite and ethereal illusiveness +of surface, comparable only to the loveliest works of the Florentine +Renaissance; while the assured mastery of the most complicated problems +of relief evinced in the "Shaw Memorial"--a mastery which shows, in the +result, no trace of the strenuous and long-continued effort that it +cost--is unsurpassed--I had almost said unequalled--in any work of any +epoch. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 25.--Saint-Gaudens. "The Butler Children."] + +Illustration can give but a faint idea of the special beauties of this +or that particular work in this long series. It can show no more than +the composition and the draughtsmanship. The refinement of workmanship, +the sensitiveness and subtlety of modelling, can be appreciated only +before the works themselves. And this sensitiveness and delicacy of +workmanship, this mastery of the problems of relief, with its reliance +on illusion and its necessary abstention from realization, is applied to +sculpture in the round, and becomes with Saint-Gaudens, as it did with +the sculptors of the Florentine Renaissance, the means of escape from +the matter of fact. The concrete art of sculpture becomes an art of +mystery and of suggestion--an art having affinities with that of +painting. Hollows are filled up, shadows are obliterated, lines are +softened or accentuated, as the effect may require, details are +eliminated or made prominent as they are less or more essential and +significant, as they hinder or aid the expressiveness of the whole. It +is by such methods that beauty is achieved, that the most unpromising +material is subdued to the purposes of art, that even our hideous modern +costume may be made to yield a decorative effect. Pure sculpture, as the +ancients understood it, the art of form _per se_, demands the nude +figure, or a costume which reveals it rather than hides it. The costume +of to-day reveals as little of the figure as possible, and, unlike +mediaeval armor, it has no beauty of its own. A painter may make it +interesting by dwelling on color or tone or texture, or may so lose it +in shadow that it ceases to count at all except as a space of darkness. +A sculptor can do none of these things, and if he is to make it serve +the ends of beauty he has need of all the resourcefulness and all the +skill of the master of low relief. It was fortunate that the artist +whose greatest task was to commemorate the heroes of the Civil War +should have had the temperament and the training of such a master, and I +know of no other sculptor than Saint-Gaudens who has so magnificently +succeeded in the rendering of modern clothing--no other who could have +made the uniform of Farragut or the frock coat of Lincoln as interesting +as the armor of Colleone or the toga of Augustus. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 26.--Saint-Gaudens. "Sarah Redwood Lee."] + +But if the genius of Saint-Gaudens was primarily a decorative genius--if +it was, even, in his earlier work, a trifle picturesque, so that, as he +said himself, he had "to fight against picturesqueness," his work was +never pictorial. He never indulged in perspective or composed his +reliefs on more than one plane; never took such liberties with the +traditions of sculpture as did Ghiberti, or painted pictures in bronze +or marble as more than one modern has done. His very feeling for +decoration kept him from pictorial realism, and his fight against +picturesqueness was nobly won. His design becomes ever cleaner and more +classic; by years of work and of experience he becomes stronger and +stronger in the more purely sculptural qualities--attains a grasp of +form and structure only second to his mastery of composition. He is +always a consummate artist--in his finest works he is a great sculptor +in the strictest sense of the word. + +I have dwelt somewhat at length upon technical matters because technical +power is the first necessity for an artist; because technical mastery is +that for which he consciously endeavors; because the technical language +of his art is the necessary vehicle of expression for his thoughts and +emotions, and determines, even, the nature of the thoughts and emotions +he shall express. But while the technical accomplishment of an artist +is the most necessary part of his art, without which his imagination +would be mute, it is not the highest or the most significant part of it. +I have tried to show that Saint-Gaudens was a highly accomplished +artist, the equal of any of his contemporaries, the superior of most. +What made him something much more than this--something infinitely more +important for us--was the vigor and loftiness of his imagination. +Without his imaginative power he would have been an artist of great +distinction, of whom any country might be proud; with it he became a +great creator, able to embody in enduring bronze the highest ideals and +the deepest feelings of a nation and of a time. + +It is a penetrating and sympathetic imagination that gave him his +unerring grasp of character, that enabled him to seize upon the +significant elements of a personality, to divine the attitude and the +gesture that should reveal it, to eliminate the unessential, to present +to us the man. This is the imagination of the portrait-painter, and +Saint-Gaudens has shown it again and again, in many of his reliefs and +memorial tablets, above all in his portrait statues. He showed it +conclusively in so early a work as the "Farragut" (Pl. 27), a work that +remains one of the modern masterpieces of portrait statuary. The man +stands there forever, feet apart, upon his swaying deck, his glass in +one strong hand, cool, courageous, ready, full of determination but +absolutely without bluster or braggadocio, a sailor, a gentleman, and a +hero. He showed it again, and with ampler maturity, in that august +figure of "Lincoln" (Pl. 28), grandly dignified, austerely simple, +sorrowfully human, risen from the chair of state that marks his office, +but about to speak as a man to men, his bent head and worn face +filled with a sense of power, but even more with the sadness of +responsibility--filled, above all, with a yearning, tender passion of +sympathy and love. In imaginative presentation of character, in nobility +of feeling and breadth of treatment, no less than in perfection of +workmanship, these are among the world's few worthy monuments to its +great men. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 27.--Saint-Gaudens. "Farragut."] + +And they are monuments to Americans by an American. Saint-Gaudens had +lived through the time of the Civil War, had felt, as a boy, the stir of +its great happenings in his blood, and its epic emotions had become a +part of his consciousness, deep-seated at the roots of his nature. The +feelings of the American people were his feelings, and his +representations of these and of other heroes of that great struggle are +among the most national as they are among the most vital things that our +country has produced in art. + +But if Saint-Gaudens's imagination was thus capable of raising the +portrait to the dignity of the type, it was no less capable of endowing +the imagined type with all the individuality of the portrait. In the +"Deacon Chapin" (Pl. 29), of Springfield, we have a purely ideal +production, the finest embodiment of New England Puritanism in our art, +for no portrait of the real Chapin existed. This swift-striding, +stern-looking old man, who clasps his Bible as Moses clasped the tables +of the law and grips his peaceful walking-stick as though it were a +sword, is a Puritan of the Puritans; but he is an individual also--a +rough-hewn piece of humanity with plenty of the old Adam about him--an +individual so clearly seen and so vigorously characterized that one can +hardly believe the statue an invention or realize that no such old +Puritan deacon ever existed in the flesh. Something of this imaginative +quality there is in almost everything Saint-Gaudens touched, even in +his purely decorative figures. His angels and caryatides are not +classical goddesses but modern women, lovely, but with a personal and +particular loveliness, not insisted upon but delicately suggested. And +it is not the personality of the model who chanced to pose for them but +an invented personality, the expression of the nobility, the sweetness, +and the pure-mindedness of their creator. And in such a figure as that +of the "Adams Memorial" (Pl. 30), in Rock Creek Cemetery in Washington, +his imaginative power reaches to a degree of impressiveness almost +unequalled in modern art. One knows of nothing since the tombs of the +Medici that fills one with the same hushed awe as this shrouded, hooded, +deeply brooding figure, rigid with contemplation, still with an eternal +stillness, her soul rapt from her body on some distant quest. Is she +Nirvana? Is she The Peace of God? She has been given many names--her +maker would give her none. Her meaning is mystery; she is the +everlasting enigma. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 28.--Saint-Gaudens. "Lincoln."] + +Not the greatest artist could twice sound so deep a note as this. The +figure remains unique in the work of the sculptor as it is unique in the +art of the century. Yet, perhaps, Saint-Gaudens's greatest works are two +in which all the varied elements of his genius find simultaneous +expression; into which his mastery of composition, his breadth and +solidity of structure, his technical skill, his insight into character, +and his power of imagination enter in nearly equal measure: the "Shaw +Memorial" and the great equestrian group of the "Sherman Monument." + +The "Shaw Memorial" (Pl. 31) is a relief, but a relief of many planes. +The marching troops are in three files, one behind the other, the +varying distances from the spectator marked by differences of the degree +of projection. Nearer than all of them is the equestrian figure of Shaw +himself, the horse and rider modelled nearly but not quite in the round. +The whole scale of relief was altered in the course of the work, after +it had once been nearly completed, and the mastery of the infinitely +complicated problem of relief in many degrees is supreme. But all the +more because the scheme was so full and so varied, the artist has +carefully avoided the pictorial in his treatment. There is no +perspective, the figures being all on the same scale, and there is no +background, no setting of houses or landscape. Everywhere, between and +above the figures, is the flat surface which is the immemorial tradition +of sculpture in relief; and the fact that it _is_ a surface, +representing nothing, is made more clear by the inscription written upon +it--an inscription placed there, consciously or unconsciously, that it +might have that very effect. The composition is magnificent, whether for +its intrinsic beauty of arrangement--its balancing of lines and +spaces--or for its perfect expressiveness. The rhythmic step of marching +men is perfectly rendered, and the guns fill the middle of the panel in +an admirable pattern, without confusion or monotony. The heads are +superb in characterization, strikingly varied and individual, yet each a +strongly marked racial type, unmistakably African in all its forms. + +[Illustration: Plate 29.--Saint-Gaudens. "Deacon Chapin."] + +These are merits, and merits of a very high order, enough of themselves +to place the work in the front rank of modern sculpture, but they are, +after all, its minor merits. What makes it the great thing it is is the +imaginative power displayed in it--the depth of emotion expressed, and +expressed with perfect simplicity and directness and an entire +absence of parade. The negro troops are marching steadily, soberly, +with high seriousness of purpose, and their white leader rides beside +them, drawn sword in hand, but with no military swagger, courageous, yet +with a hint of melancholy, ready not only to lay down his life but to +face, if need be, an ignominious death for the cause he believes to be +just. And above them, laden with poppy and with laurels, floats the +Death Angel pointing out the way. + +[Illustration: Copyright, Curtis & Cameron. +Plate 30.--Saint-Gaudens. "Adams Memorial."] + +It is a work which artists may study again and again with growing +admiration and increasing profit, yet it is one that has found its way +straight to the popular heart. It is not always--it is not often--that +the artists and the public are thus at one. When they are it is safe to +assume that the work they equally admire is truly great--that it belongs +to the highest order of noble works of art. + +The Sherman group (Pl. 32), though it has been more criticised than the +"Shaw Memorial," seems to me, if possible, an even finer work. The main +objection to it has been that it is not sufficiently "monumental," and, +indeed, it has not the massiveness nor the repose of such a work as +Donatello's "Gattamelata," the greatest of all equestrian statues. It +could not well have these qualities in the same degree, its motive being +what it is, but they are, perhaps, not ill exchanged for the character +and the nationalism so marked in horse and rider and for the +irresistible onward rush of movement never more adequately expressed. In +all other respects the group seems to me almost beyond criticism. The +composition--composition, now, in the round and to be considered from +many points of view--builds up superbly; the flow of line in wing and +limb and drapery is perfect; the purely sculptural problems of +anatomical rendering, equine and human, are thoroughly resolved; the +modelling, as such, is almost as fine as the design. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De. W.C. Ward. +Plate 31.--Saint-Gaudens. "Shaw Memorial."] + +To the boyish Saint-Gaudens Sherman had seemed the typical American +hero. To the matured artist he had sat for an admirable bust. The +sculptor had thus an unusual knowledge of his subject, a perfect +sympathy with his theme; and he has produced a work of epic sweep and +significance. Tall and erect, the general sits his horse, his military +cloak bellying out behind him, his trousers strapped down over his +shoes, his hat in his right hand, dropping at arm's length behind his +knee, his bare head like that of an old eagle, looking straight forward. +The horse is as long and thin as his rider, with a tremendous stride; +and his big head, closely reined in, twitches viciously at the bridle. +Before the horse and rider, upon the ground, yet as if new-lighted there +from an aerial existence, half walks, half flies, a splendid winged +figure, one arm outstretched, the other brandishing the palm--Victory +leading them on. She has a certain fierce wildness of aspect, but her +rapt gaze and half-open mouth indicate the seer of visions--peace is +ahead, and an end of war. On the bosom of her gown is broidered the +eagle of the United States, for she is an American Victory, as this is +an American man on an American horse; and the broken pine bough beneath +the horse's feet localizes the victorious march--it is the march through +Georgia to the sea. + +Long ago I expressed my conviction that the "Sherman Monument" is third +in rank of the great equestrian statues of the world. To-day I am not +sure that that conviction remains unaltered. Donatello's "Gattamelata" +is unapproached and unapproachable in its quiet dignity; Verrocchio's +"Colleone" is unsurpassed in picturesque attractiveness. Both are +consecrated by the admiration of centuries. To-day I am not sure that +this work of an American sculptor is not, in its own way, equal to +either of them. + +There are those who are troubled by the introduction of the symbolical +figures in such works as the "Shaw Memorial" and the Sherman statue; +and, indeed, it was a bold enterprise to place them where they are, +mingling thus in the same work the real and the ideal, the actual and +the allegorical. But the boldness seems to me abundantly justified by +success. In either case the entire work is pitched to the key of these +figures; the treatment of the whole is so elevated by style and so +infused with imagination that there is no shock of unlikeness or +difficulty of transition. And these figures are not merely necessary to +the composition, an essential part of its beauty--they are even more +essential to the expression of the artist's thought. Without that +hovering Angel of Death, the negro troops upon the "Shaw Memorial" might +be going anywhere, to battle or to review. We should have a passing +regiment, nothing more. Without the striding Victory before him, the +impetuous movement of Sherman's horse would have no especial +significance. And these figures are no mere conventional allegories; +they are true creations. To their creator the unseen was as real as the +seen--nay, it was more so. That Shaw was riding to his death at the +command of duty was, the only thing that made Shaw memorable. That +Sherman was marching to a victory the fruits of which should be peace +was the essential thing about Sherman. Death and Duty--Victory and +Peace--in each case the compound ideal found its expression in a figure +entirely original and astonishingly living: a _person_ as truly as Shaw +or Sherman themselves. He could not have left them out. It were +better to give up the work entirely than to do it otherwise than as he +saw it. + +[Illustration: Copyright, De W.C. Ward. +Plate 32.--Saint-Gaudens. "Sherman."] + +I have described and discussed but a few of the many works of this great +artist, choosing those which seem to me the most significant and the +most important, and in doing so I have keenly felt the inadequacy of +words to express the qualities of an art which exists by forms. +Fortunately, the works themselves are, for the most part, readily +accessible. In the originals, in casts, or in photographs, they may be +studied by every one. Nothing is more difficult than to estimate justly +the greatness of an object that is too near to us--it is only as it +recedes into the distance that the mountain visibly overtops its +neighboring hills. It is difficult to understand that this man so lately +familiar to us, moving among us as one of ourselves, is of the company +of the immortals. Yet I believe, as we make this study of his works, as +we yield ourselves to the graciousness of his charm or are exalted by +the sweep of his imagination, we shall come to feel an assured +conviction that Augustus Saint-Gaudens was not merely the most +accomplished artist of America, not merely one of the foremost sculptors +of his time--we shall feel that he is one of those great, creative +minds, transcending time and place, not of America or of to-day, but of +the world and forever. + +Where, among such minds, he will take his rank we need not ask. It is +enough that he is among them. Such an artist is assuredly a benefactor +of his country, and it is eminently fitting that his gift to us should +be acknowledged by such tribute as we can pay him. By his works in other +lands and by his world-wide fame he sheds a glory upon the name of +America, helping to convince the world that here also are those who +occupy themselves with the things of the spirit, that here also are +other capabilities than those of industrial energy and material success. +In his many minor works he has endowed us with an inexhaustible heritage +of beauty--beauty which is "about the best thing God invents." He is the +educator of our taste and of more than our taste--of our sentiment and +our emotions. In his great monuments he has not only given us fitting +presentments of our national heroes; he has expressed, and in expressing +elevated, our loftiest ideals; he has expressed, and in expressing +deepened, our profoundest feelings. He has become the voice of all that +is best in the American people, and his works are incentives to +patriotism and lessons in devotion to duty. + +But the great and true artist is more than a benefactor of his country, +he is a benefactor of the human race. The body of Saint-Gaudens is +ashes, but his mind, his spirit, his character have taken on enduring +forms and are become a part of the inheritance of mankind. And if, in +the lapse of ages, his very name should be forgotten--as are the names +of many great artists who have gone before him--yet his work will +remain; and while any fragment of it is decipherable the world will be +the richer in that he lived. + + + + +[Transcriber's Note: In the Table of Illustrations and in the caption for +plate 17, Bolensa was corrected to Bolsena.] + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Artist and Public, by Kenyon Cox + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTIST AND PUBLIC *** + +***** This file should be named 16655.txt or 16655.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/6/6/5/16655/ + +Produced by Ted Garvin, Melissa Er-Raqabi and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/16655.zip b/16655.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f5c623b --- /dev/null +++ b/16655.zip diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7e18508 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #16655 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/16655) |
